More annual reports from Xenia Hotels & Resorts:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of Xenia Hotels & Resorts:
Condor Hospitality Trust, Inc.2 0 1 6 A N N U A L R E P O R T PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW LIFESTYLE PREMIUM FULL SERVICE URBAN UPSCALE Andaz Napa Andaz San Diego Andaz Savannah Fairmont Dallas Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel Hyatt Regency Santa Clara Courtyard Birmingham Downtown at UAB Loews New Orleans Hotel Courtyard Fort Worth Downtown/Blackstone Bohemian Hotel Celebration Marriott Charleston Town Center Courtyard Kansas City Country Club Plaza Bohemian Hotel Savannah Riverfront Marriott Chicago at Medical District/UIC Courtyard Pittsburgh Downtown Canary Santa Barbara Marriott Dallas City Center Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston (cid:16)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:148)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:150)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:10)(cid:148)(cid:139)(cid:136)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:10)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:428)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:146)(cid:131) Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook Marriott Napa Valley Hotel & Spa Grand Bohemian Hotel Orlando Marriott San Francisco Airport Waterfront Hotel Commonwealth Hotel Monaco Chicago Hotel Monaco Denver Hotel Monaco Salt Lake City Hotel Palomar Philadelphia Hyatt Centric Key West Resort & Spa Lorien Hotel & Spa RiverPlace Hotel Marriott West Des Moines Marriott Woodlands Waterway Hotel & Convention Center Renaissance Atlanta Waverly Hotel & Convention Center Renaissance Austin Hotel Westin Galleria Houston Westin Oaks Houston at the Galleria Hampton Inn & Suites Baltimore Inner Harbor Hilton Garden Inn Washington DC Downtown Residence Inn Baltimore Downtown/Inner Harbor Residence Inn Boston Cambridge Residence Inn Denver City Center 4 2 H OT E L S , CO M P R I S I N G 1 0 , 9 1 1 R O O M S ACROSS 20 STATES AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (as of 2/28/2017) Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2016 Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS To Our Shareholders, 2016 was an exciting and productive year for Xenia! While various headwinds across the lodging industry presented challenges from an operating perspective, we are very pleased with the continued execution of our strategy during the year. Despite slowing industry growth (cid:148)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:151)(cid:144)(cid:139)(cid:147)(cid:151)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:134)(cid:139)(cid:136)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:151)(cid:142)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:136)(cid:131)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:149)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:141)(cid:135)(cid:150)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:146)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:155)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:133)(cid:151)(cid:149)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:146)(cid:135)(cid:133)(cid:150)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:151)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:133)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:3) manage and are excited about the results of these efforts. We remained diligently committed to the four pillars that form our strategy – a broad portfolio mix, a focus on quality through transactions (cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:138)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:143)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:134)(cid:139)(cid:136)(cid:136)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:131)(cid:137)(cid:135)(cid:143)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:150)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:137)(cid:3)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:139)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:484)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:3)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:151)(cid:142)(cid:150)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:884)(cid:882)(cid:883)(cid:888)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:3)(cid:138)(cid:139)(cid:137)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:3) quality portfolio and stronger balance sheet than when we started the year. This was a year of continued portfolio upgrades, effectuated through capital investment in our hotels, strategic dispositions, and the acquisition of the outstanding Hotel Commonwealth. Additionally, we have placed a consistent emphasis on delivering shareholder value through the execution of a disciplined capital allocation strategy and (cid:146)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:137)(cid:138)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:151)(cid:144)(cid:139)(cid:147)(cid:151)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:149)(cid:135)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:131)(cid:137)(cid:135)(cid:143)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:142)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:143)(cid:484)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:135)(cid:142)(cid:145)(cid:153)(cid:3)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:138)(cid:139)(cid:137)(cid:138)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:137)(cid:138)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:145)(cid:143)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:143)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:137)(cid:144)(cid:139)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:133)(cid:138)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:143)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:149)(cid:3) in 2016 and the impact of these on the strength and growth prospects of our company. (cid:11)(cid:139)(cid:137)(cid:138)(cid:486)(cid:20)(cid:151)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:7)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:151)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:8)(cid:154)(cid:146)(cid:145)(cid:149)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:139)(cid:149)(cid:141)(cid:484)(cid:3) Transaction activity further improved our portfolio throughout the year. In January, we acquired the Hotel Commonwealth in Boston, Massachusetts for $136 million. This 245-room luxury independent, boutique (cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:136)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:138)(cid:145)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:142)(cid:145)(cid:133)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:14)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:143)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:147)(cid:151)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:144)(cid:135)(cid:139)(cid:137)(cid:138)(cid:132)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:138)(cid:145)(cid:145)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:145)(cid:149)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:148)(cid:139)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:3)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:137)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:151)(cid:133)(cid:138)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:153)(cid:131)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:141)(cid:3) and Boston University. Additionally, we sold nine hotels, comprising 1,887 rooms, for a total sales price of $290 million. These dispositions enabled us to reduce our exposure in several challenging markets, exit a number of non-core, low-growth markets, and remove from (cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:135)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:142)(cid:145)(cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:486)(cid:147)(cid:151)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:138)(cid:145)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:142)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:142)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:138)(cid:131)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:147)(cid:151)(cid:139)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:137)(cid:144)(cid:139)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:144)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:486)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:143)(cid:3)(cid:133)(cid:131)(cid:146)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:135)(cid:154)(cid:146)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:484)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:26)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:133)(cid:138)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3) the transactions, as well as the pricing we were able to achieve. As we look ahead to 2017 we intend to continue to evaluate potential acquisition and disposition opportunities with an eye toward further improving the portfolio’s growth prospects in both the short and the long term. Our year-end portfolio, comprising 42 hotels or 10,911 rooms, boasted a 2016 RevPAR of $152.46, which was 7% higher than our portfolio RevPAR in 2015, an indication of the high quality level of the hotels we own. (cid:5)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:150)(cid:486)(cid:12)(cid:144)(cid:486)(cid:6)(cid:142)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:135)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:152)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:154)(cid:139)(cid:132)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:484)(cid:3)(cid:3)Proceeds from our 2016 dispositions allowed us to further strengthen our balance (cid:149)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:135)(cid:150)(cid:3) (cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3) (cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:131)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:3) (cid:131)(cid:3) (cid:976)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:154)(cid:139)(cid:132)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:3) (cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:131)(cid:137)(cid:135)(cid:3) (cid:146)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:484)(cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:7)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:137)(cid:3) (cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3) (cid:155)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:3) (cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3) (cid:146)(cid:131)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:3) (cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:136)(cid:3) (cid:145)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:3) (cid:836)(cid:884)(cid:889)(cid:887)(cid:3) (cid:143)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3) (cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:3) (cid:143)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:137)(cid:131)(cid:137)(cid:135)(cid:3) (cid:142)(cid:145)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:149)(cid:481)(cid:3) (cid:131)(cid:134)(cid:134)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:137)(cid:3) (cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:142)(cid:3) (cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:132)(cid:150)(cid:3) maturities through April 2018, and lowered our weighted average interest rate to 3.24% as of December 31. As a result, we increased our unencumbered asset pool to 24 hotels, now representing over 55% of rooms and Hotel EBITDA. Our $125 million term loan that was entered into in late 2015 was funded and we obtained a new $60 million mortgage loan collateralized by the Hotel Palomar Philadelphia. (cid:12)(cid:144)(cid:3) (cid:131)(cid:134)(cid:134)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:481)(cid:3) (cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3) (cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3) (cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:3) (cid:143)(cid:145)(cid:134)(cid:139)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3) (cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:135)(cid:3) (cid:142)(cid:145)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:149)(cid:3) (cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:151)(cid:142)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:137)(cid:3) (cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:3) (cid:145)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:3) (cid:836)(cid:887)(cid:882)(cid:3) (cid:143)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3) (cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3) (cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:143)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3) (cid:146)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:149)(cid:481)(cid:3) (cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3) (cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:154)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3) (cid:15)(cid:12)(cid:5)(cid:18)(cid:21)(cid:3) (cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3) (cid:144)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:142)(cid:155)(cid:3) (cid:836)(cid:883)(cid:886)(cid:882)(cid:3)(cid:143)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:152)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:139)(cid:131)(cid:132)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:148)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:132)(cid:150)(cid:484)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:132)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:133)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:151)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:150)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:137)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:135)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:138)(cid:131)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:143)(cid:146)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:147)(cid:151)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:976)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:154)(cid:139)(cid:132)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:135)(cid:3) opportunistic as we evaluate internal and external growth possibilities moving forward. (cid:7)(cid:139)(cid:136)(cid:136)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:149)(cid:149)(cid:135)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:16)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:131)(cid:137)(cid:135)(cid:143)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:7)(cid:148)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:484)(cid:3) Expense control continues to be a primary area of focus and we were pleased (cid:153)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:132)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:131)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:137)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:884)(cid:882)(cid:883)(cid:888)(cid:484)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:23)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:151)(cid:133)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:149)(cid:136)(cid:151)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:143)(cid:146)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:143)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:146)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:146)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:143)(cid:139)(cid:156)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:133)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:149)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:137)(cid:144)(cid:139)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3) portion of our portfolio, coupled with our experienced and dedicated asset management team, led to margin growth despite a slight revenue decline. Houston fundamentals continued to be a drag on our portfolio results, both as it relates to RevPAR and margins. However, (cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:143)(cid:3)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:133)(cid:145)(cid:137)(cid:144)(cid:139)(cid:156)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:141)(cid:135)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:134)(cid:145)(cid:153)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:149)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:142)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:3)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:151)(cid:142)(cid:150)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:145)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:133)(cid:145)(cid:149)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:134)(cid:151)(cid:133)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:131)(cid:152)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:137)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:3) (cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:131)(cid:132)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:151)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:8)(cid:5)(cid:12)(cid:23)(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:976)(cid:142)(cid:145)(cid:153)(cid:486)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:137)(cid:138)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:135)(cid:150)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:139)(cid:146)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:484)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:132)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:131)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:137)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:137)(cid:138)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:149)(cid:3) an example of our ability to leverage relationships with brands and managers during any type of operating environment. In discussing our brands and managers, it is important to acknowledge and recognize the dedicated teams at each of our hotels who continue to strive for excellence and success in improving operating performance while providing outstanding guest service. (cid:7)(cid:139)(cid:149)(cid:133)(cid:139)(cid:146)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:131)(cid:146)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:142)(cid:142)(cid:145)(cid:133)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:16)(cid:131)(cid:154)(cid:139)(cid:143)(cid:139)(cid:156)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:23)(cid:145)(cid:150)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:138)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:138)(cid:145)(cid:142)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:135)(cid:150)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:144)(cid:484) We are focused on maximizing returns to our shareholders. In addition to property transactions, strategic balance sheet management, and property optimization, we utilize prudent dividend payments (cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:138)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:146)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:133)(cid:138)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:134)(cid:148)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:138)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:138)(cid:145)(cid:142)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:152)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:151)(cid:135)(cid:484)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:12)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:13)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:151)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:884)(cid:882)(cid:883)(cid:888)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:134)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:146)(cid:146)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:154)(cid:139)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:142)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:884)(cid:882)(cid:936)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:136)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:148)(cid:149)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:155)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:3) as a publicly-traded company. We also repurchased approximately $75 million of our common shares in 2016. During 2016, our stock price increased approximately 26%, which together with our strong dividend yield, resulted in total shareholder return of over 35%. By this measure, we outperformed our lodging REIT peers by nearly 20% and the MSCI REIT Index by over 25%. (cid:23)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:144)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:137)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:884)(cid:882)(cid:883)(cid:889)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:139)(cid:146)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:145)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:151)(cid:149)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:155)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:133)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:151)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:142)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:137)(cid:486)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:143)(cid:484)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:26)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:133)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:131)(cid:132)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:3) (cid:146)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:137)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:884)(cid:882)(cid:883)(cid:888)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:145)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:145)(cid:143)(cid:146)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:131)(cid:141)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:134)(cid:152)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:131)(cid:137)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:146)(cid:146)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:151)(cid:144)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:148)(cid:139)(cid:149)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:135)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:145)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:143)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:139)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3) strength will enable us to grow the portfolio to create shareholder value. We expect to further upgrade our portfolio and believe that our broad market mix will allow us to evaluate a variety of opportunities in order to achieve compelling risk-adjusted returns. We also expect (cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:132)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:146)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:135)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:136)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:143)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:135)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:133)(cid:131)(cid:146)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:135)(cid:154)(cid:146)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:884)(cid:882)(cid:883)(cid:889)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:153)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:134)(cid:148)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:144)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:137)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:153)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:148)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:137)(cid:138)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:137)(cid:144)(cid:139)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:145)(cid:152)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:149)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3) guestrooms at several hotels that we believe are located in some of the strongest lodging markets in the U.S. (cid:10)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:150)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:137)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:137)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:139)(cid:156)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:147)(cid:151)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:976)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:154)(cid:139)(cid:132)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:132)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:149)(cid:138)(cid:135)(cid:135)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:132)(cid:139)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:155)(cid:3)(cid:150)(cid:145)(cid:3)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:154)(cid:139)(cid:143)(cid:139)(cid:156)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:150)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:142)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:3) performance, we are excited about the future of Xenia and look forward to another year of success with you as our shareholders. On behalf of Xenia and our Board of Directors, I thank you for your support of our company. Sincerely, Marcel Verbaas (cid:19)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:138)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:8)(cid:154)(cid:135)(cid:133)(cid:151)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:136)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:148) Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2016 Annual Report Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2016 Annual Report UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) Í ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 OR ‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period ended to Commission file number 001-36594 Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Maryland (State of Incorporation) 200 S. Orange Avenue Suite 2700, Orlando, Florida (Address of Principal Executive Offices) 20-0141677 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 32801 (Zip Code) (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code): (407) 246-8100 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class: Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share Name of Exchange on Which Registered: New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Í Yes ‘ No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ‘ Yes Í No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. Í Yes ‘ No Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Í Yes ‘ No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Í Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. (See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Large accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ‘ Yes Í No Í Accelerated filer ‘ Smaller reporting company ‘ ‘ The aggregate market value of the 107,473,203 shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1.8 billion based on the closing price of the New York Stock Exchange for such common stock as of June 30, 2016. As of February 24, 2017, there were 106,868,459 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 per value per share, outstanding. The registrant incorporates by reference portions of its Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be held on May 23, 2017, into Part III of this Form 10-K to the extent stated herein. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. 2016 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT Item No. Part I Page Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements Market and Industry Data Trademarks, Service Marks, and Tradenames Disclaimer Certain Defined Terms Business Risk Factors Unresolved Staff Comments Properties Legal Proceedings Mine Safety Disclosures Part II Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Selected Financial Data Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Controls and Procedures Other Information Part III Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Executive Compensation Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Principal Accounting Fees and Services Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules Summary of Form 10-K Disclosures Signatures Part IV Item 1. Item 1A. Item 1B. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Item 7A. Item 8. Item 9. Item 9A. Item 9B. Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. Item 15. Item 16. ii iii iv iv iv 1 8 33 33 41 41 42 46 48 79 80 80 80 80 81 81 81 81 81 82 85 86 - i - SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), other than purely historical information, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“the Exchange Act”). These statements include statements about Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s (“Xenia”) plans, objectives, strategies, financial performance and outlook, trends, the amount and timing of future cash distributions, prospects or future events and involve known and unknown risks that are difficult to predict. As a result, our actual financial results, performance, achievements or prospects may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “guidance,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “likely,” “will,” “would,” “illustrative” and variations of these terms and similar expressions, or the negative of these terms or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by Xenia and its management based on their knowledge and understanding of the business and industry, are inherently uncertain. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and stockholders should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. There are a number of risks, uncertainties and other important factors, many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report. Such risks, uncertainties and other important factors, include, among others, the risks, uncertainties and factors set forth under “Part I-Item IA. Risk Factors” and “Part II-Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the risks and uncertainties related to the following: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • business, financial and operating risks inherent to real estate investments and the lodging industry; seasonal and cyclical volatility in the lodging industry; adverse changes in the energy industry that result in a sustained downturn of related businesses and corporate spending that may negatively impact our revenues and results of operations; macroeconomic and other factors beyond our control that can adversely affect and reduce demand for hotel rooms; contraction in the U.S. or global economy or low levels of economic growth; levels of spending in business and leisure segments as well as consumer confidence; declines in occupancy (“OCC”) and average daily rate (“ADR”); fluctuations in the supply and demand for hotel rooms; changes in the competitive environment in lodging industry, including due to consolidation of management companies and/or franchisors, and changes in the markets where we own hotels; events beyond our control, such as war, terrorist attacks, travel-related health concerns and natural disasters; our reliance on third-party hotel management companies to operate and manage our hotels; our ability to maintain good relationships with our third-party hotel management companies and franchisors; our failure to maintain brand operating standards; our ability to maintain our brand licenses at our hotels; relationships with labor unions and changes in labor laws; loss of our senior management team or key personnel; our ability to identify and consummate additional acquisitions and dispositions of hotels; our ability to integrate and successfully operate hotel properties that we acquire and the risks associated with these hotel properties; the impact of hotel renovations, repositionings, redevelopments and re-branding activities; our ability to access capital for renovations and acquisitions on terms and at times that are acceptable to us; - ii - • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • the fixed cost nature of hotel ownership; our ability to service, restructure or refinance our debt; changes in interest rates and operating costs; compliance with regulatory regimes and local laws; uninsured or underinsured losses, including those relating to natural disasters, terrorism or cyber-attacks; changes in distribution channels, such as through internet travel intermediaries or websites that facilitate the short-term rental of homes and apartments from owners; the amount of debt that we currently have or may incur in the future; provisions in our debt agreements that may restrict the operation of our business; our organizational and governance structure; our status as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”); our taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) lessee structure; the cost of compliance with and liabilities under environmental, health and safety laws; adverse litigation judgments or settlements; changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax valuations or rates; changes in federal, state or local tax law, including legislative, administrative, regulatory or other actions affecting REITs; changes in governmental regulations or interpretations thereof; and estimates relating to our ability to make distributions to our stockholders in the future. These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause our actual financial results, performance, achievements or prospects to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could harm our results. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth above. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake or assume any obligation to update publicly any of these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, new information or future events, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking statements, except to the extent required by applicable laws. If we update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements. The “Company”, “Xenia”, “we”, “our” or “us” means Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and one or more of its subsidiaries (including XHR LP (the “Operating Partnership”) and XHR Holding, Inc. (together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, “XHR Holding”)), or, as the context may require, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. only, the Operating Partnership only or XHR Holding only. MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA The market data and certain other statistical information used throughout this Annual Report are based on independent industry publications, government publications or other published independent sources. These sources generally state that the information they provide has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but that the accuracy and completeness of the information are not guaranteed. The forecasts and projections are based on industry surveys and the preparers’ experience in the industry, and there is no assurance that any of the projected amounts will be achieved. We believe that the surveys and market research others have performed are reliable, but we have not independently verified this information. STR Inc. (“STR”) and CBRE Hotels (“CBRE”) are the primary sources for third-party market data and industry statistics and forecasts. STR does not guarantee the performance of any company about which it collects and provides data. The reproduction of STR’s data without their written permission is strictly prohibited. Nothing in the STR or CBRE data should be construed as advice. Some data is also based on our good faith estimates. - iii - TRADEMARKS, SERVICE MARKS AND TRADENAMES Xenia Hotels & Resorts® and related trademarks, trade names and service marks of Xenia appearing in this Annual Report are the property of Xenia. Unless otherwise noted, all other trademarks, trade names or service marks appearing in this Annual Report are the property of their respective owners, including Marriott International, Inc., Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group LLC, Hyatt Corporation, Aston Hotels & Resorts LLC, Fairmont Hotels & Resorts, Hilton Worldwide Inc., and Loews Hotels, Inc. or their respective parents, subsidiaries or affiliates (“Brand Companies”). In the event that any of our management agreements or franchise agreements with the Brand Companies are terminated for any reason, the use of all applicable trademarks and service marks owned by the Brand Companies will cease at the hotel where the management agreement or franchise agreement was terminated; all signs and materials bearing the marks and other indicia connecting the hotel to the Brand Companies will be removed (at our expense). DISCLAIMER None of the Brand Companies or their respective directors, officers, agents or employees are issuers of the shares described herein or had responsibility for the creation or contents of this Annual Report. None of the Brand Companies or their respective directors, officers, agents or employees make any representation or warranty as to the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any of the following information, including any financial information and any projections of future performance. The Brand Companies do not have an exclusive relationship with us and will continue to be engaged in other business ventures, including the acquisition, development, construction, ownership or operation of lodging, residential and vacation ownership properties, which are or may become competitive with the properties held by us. Except where the context suggests otherwise, we define certain terms in this Annual Report as follows: CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS • • • • • • • • • • • • • “ADR” or “average daily rate” means hotel room revenue divided by total number of rooms sold in a given period; “occupancy” means the total number of rooms sold in a given period divided by the total number of rooms available at a hotel or group of hotels; “RevPAR” or “revenue per available room” means hotel room revenue divided by room nights available to guests for a given period, and does not include non-room revenues such as food and beverage revenue or other operating revenues; “Top 25 Markets” refers to the top 25 U.S. lodging markets as defined by STR; an “upper midscale” hotel refers to an upper midscale hotel as defined by STR; an “upscale” hotel refers to an upscale hotel as defined by STR; an “urban upscale” hotel refers to a hotel located in an urban or similar high-density commercial area, such as a central business district, and defined as “upscale” or “upper midscale” by STR; an “upper upscale” hotel refers to an upper upscale hotel as defined by STR; a “luxury” hotel refers to a luxury hotel as defined by STR; an “independent” hotel refers to an independent hotel as defined by STR; a “lifestyle” hotel refers to an innovative hotel with a focus on providing a unique and individualized guest experience in a smaller footprint by combining traditional hotel services with modern technologies and placing an emphasis on local influence; a “premium full service hotel” refers to a hotel defined as “upper upscale” or “luxury” by STR, but excluding hotels referred to as “lifestyle” hotels, as defined above; and “Aston,” “Fairmont,” “Hilton,” “Hyatt,” “Kimpton,” “Loews,” and “Marriott,” mean Aston Hotels & Resorts LLC, Fairmont Hotels & Resorts, Hilton Worldwide Inc., Hyatt Corporation, Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, LLC, Loews Hotels, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc., respectively, as well as their respective parents, subsidiaries or affiliates. - iv - Item 1. Business General PART I Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the “Company” or “Xenia”) is a Maryland corporation that invests primarily in premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotels in Top 25 Markets and key leisure destinations. Prior to February 3, 2015, Xenia was a wholly owned subsidiary of InvenTrust Properties Corp. (formerly known as Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. or “InvenTrust”), its former parent. On February 3, 2015, Xenia was spun off from InvenTrust through a taxable pro rata distribution by InvenTrust of 95% of the outstanding common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), of Xenia to holders of record of InvenTrust’s common stock as of the close of business on January 20, 2015 (the “Record Date”). Each holder of record of InvenTrust’s common stock received one share of Common Stock for every eight shares of InvenTrust’s common stock held at the close of business on the Record Date (the “Distribution”). In lieu of fractional shares, stockholders of InvenTrust received cash. On February 4, 2015, Xenia’s Common Stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “XHR.” As a result of the Distribution, the Company became a stand-alone, publicly-traded company. Xenia operates and intends to continue to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See additional detail below in “Part I-Item 1. Our Structure and Reorganization Transactions.” Substantially all of the Company’s assets are held by, and all the operations are conducted through XHR LP. XHR GP, Inc. is the sole general partner of XHR LP. XHR GP, Inc. is wholly owned by the Company. On December 31, 2016, the Company owned 98.7% of the common limited partnership units issued by the Operating Partnership (“Operating Partnership Units”). The remaining 1.3% of the common limited partnership units are owned by the other limited partners comprised of certain of our current and former executive officers and members of our Board of Directors and includes unvested long term incentive plan (“LTIP”) partnership units, which may or may not vest based on the passage of time and meeting certain market-based performance objectives. To qualify as a REIT, the Company cannot operate or manage its hotels. Therefore, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries lease the hotel properties to XHR Holding, the Company’s TRS, which engages third-party eligible independent operators to manage the hotels. The third-party non-affiliated hotel operators manage each hotel pursuant to a hotel management agreement, the terms of which are discussed in more detail under “Part I-Item 2. Our Principal Agreements.” The Company’s combined consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, XHR Holding, as well as all wholly owned subsidiaries and consolidated investments in real estate entities. The Company’s subsidiaries and consolidated investments in real estate entities generally consist of limited liability companies (“LLCs”), limited partnerships (“LPs”) and our TRS. The effects of all inter-company transactions are eliminated. As of December 31, 2016, the Company owned 42 lodging properties, 40 of which were wholly owned, with a total of 10,911 rooms, including a 75% ownership interest in two hotels owned through two consolidated investments in real estate entities. The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 200 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 2700, Orlando, Florida, 32801, and our telephone number is (407) 246-8100. The Company’s website is www.xeniareit.com. The information contained on our website or that can be accessed through our website neither constitutes part of this information statement nor is incorporated by reference herein. Our Structure and Reorganization Transactions Our History We were formed as a Delaware corporation in 2007 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of InvenTrust. Subsequently, we changed our name from Inland American Lodging Group, Inc. to IA Lodging Group, Inc. and converted to a Maryland corporation in 2014. On August 5, 2014, we changed our name to Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Our Operating Partnership was formed as a North Carolina limited partnership in 1994. On September 17, 2014, our Operating Partnership was converted to a Delaware limited partnership and changed its name to XHR LP. Our wholly-owned subsidiary is the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership, and we conduct substantially all of our business through our Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2016, we own 98.7% of the Operating Partnership Units in our Operating Partnership, with the remaining 1.3% being owned by certain of our current and former executive officers and members of the Board of Directors. 1 Our Corporate Reorganization Prior to our separation from InvenTrust, we effectuated certain reorganization transactions (collectively, the “Reorganization Transactions”) which were designed to: consolidate the ownership of our hotels into our Operating Partnership; consolidate our TRS lessees into our TRS; facilitate our separation from InvenTrust and the Distribution; and enable us to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with our short taxable year that commenced on January 5, 2015 and ended on February 3, 2015. The significant elements of our Reorganization Transactions included: • • • • The Company was renamed and converted to a Maryland corporation; Our Operating Partnership was renamed and converted to a Delaware limited partnership; Certain of our TRS lessees were transferred from a subsidiary of InvenTrust to our TRS; Certain subsidiaries owning our hotels were transferred to our Operating Partnership from other subsidiaries of ours, which subsidiaries were transferred to subsidiaries of InvenTrust other than us; • We classified and designated 125 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and issued 125 shares to 125 individual investors; • We issued 113,396,997 shares of our common stock to InvenTrust pursuant to a stock dividend effectuated prior to the Distribution; and • Certain subsidiaries that previously owned or leased the Suburban Select Service Portfolio (as defined below) or other hotels previously owned by us were transferred out of our Operating Partnership and our TRS and into subsidiaries of InvenTrust. Prior to the Reorganization Transactions, we owned all of our hotels and certain of our TRS lessees, and our remaining TRS lessees were owned by subsidiaries of InvenTrust other than us. In addition, prior to the sale of 52 suburban select service hotels (the “Suburban Select Service Portfolio”), we also owned all of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio and subsidiaries leasing certain hotels in the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, and the remaining subsidiaries leasing the Suburban Select Service Portfolio were owned by subsidiaries of InvenTrust other than us. The Suburban Select Service Portfolio was sold on November 17, 2014 to unaffiliated third party purchasers for approximately $1.1 billion, resulting in net proceeds to InvenTrust of approximately $480 million after prepayment of certain indebtedness and related costs. None of the proceeds from the sale of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio were retained by Xenia. Pursuant to the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement we entered into with InvenTrust in connection with the Distribution (the “Separation and Distribution Agreement”), we agreed to assume the first $8 million of liabilities (including any related fees and expenses) incurred following the Distribution relating to, arising out of or resulting from the ownership, operation or sale of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio and that relate to, arise out of or result from a claim or demand that is made against Xenia or InvenTrust by any person who is not a party or an affiliate of a party to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, other than liabilities arising from the breach or alleged breach by InvenTrust of certain fundamental representations made by InvenTrust to the third party purchasers of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. We have also agreed to assume and indemnify InvenTrust for certain tax liabilities attributable to the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. As part of our working capital at the time of the Distribution, InvenTrust left us with cash estimated to be sufficient to satisfy such tax obligations. The hotels included in the Suburban Select Service Portfolio were not retained by Xenia because such hotels did not generally fit within our investment criteria of investing in premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotels, with a focus on the Top 25 Markets as well as key leisure destinations in the United States. In selecting the hotels to retain in our portfolio, we also took into consideration factors such as supply growth dynamics in various markets, RevPAR and risk-adjusted return potential. In addition to the sale of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, we also sold one hotel on May 30, 2014, one hotel on August 28, 2014 and one hotel on December 31, 2014. 2 The following chart shows our structure as of December 31, 2016: Current and former executive members and members of our board of directors(1) Public Stockholders Common stock Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 100% XHR GP, Inc. 1% General partner 1.3% Limited partners 97.7% Limited partner XHR LP (our operating partnership) 100% Subsidiaries owning the Xenia portfolio Leases 100% XHR Holding, Inc. (our TRS) 100% Subsidiaries leasing the Xenia portfolio (our TRS lessees) Hotel management agreements Third party hotel managers (1) Ownership includes unvested LTIP partnership units, which may or may not vest based on the passage of time and meeting certain market-based performance objectives. Business Objectives and Growth Strategies Our objective is to allocate capital in order to invest primarily in a high-quality diversified portfolio of premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotels in Top 25 markets and key leisure destinations. We invest at valuation levels which we believe will generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. We pursue this objective through the following investment and growth strategies: • Pursue Differentiated Investment Strategy Across Targeted Markets. We use our management team’s network of relationships in the lodging industry, real estate brokers and our relationships with multiple hotel brands and management companies, among others, to source acquisition opportunities. When evaluating opportunities, we use a multi-pronged approach to investing that we believe provides us the flexibility to pursue attractive opportunities in a variety of markets across any point in the cycle. We consider the following characteristics when making investment decisions: - Market Characteristics. We seek opportunities across a range of urban and dense suburban areas, primarily in the Top 25 Markets and key leisure destinations, in the United States. We believe that this strategy provides us with a broader range of opportunities and allows us to target markets and sub-markets with particular positive characteristics, such as multiple demand generators, favorable supply and demand dynamics and attractive long- term projected RevPAR growth. We believe assets in the Top 25 Markets and key leisure destinations present attractive investment opportunities considering the favorable supply and demand dynamics, RevPAR growth trends and attractive valuations. - Asset Characteristics. We generally pursue hotels in the upper upscale and luxury segments that are affiliated with leading premium brands, as we believe these segments yield attractive risk-adjusted returns. Within these segments, we seek hotels that will provide guests with a distinctive lodging experience, tailored to reflect local market environments rather than investing in properties that are heavily dependent on conventions and group business. We seek properties with desirable locations within their markets, exceptional facilities, and other competitive advantages that are hard to replicate. We also favor properties that can be purchased below estimated replacement cost. We believe our focus on premium full service, lifestyle, and urban upscale assets, allows us to seek appropriate investments that are well suited for specific markets. - Operational and Structural Characteristics. We pursue both newly constructed assets that require limited capital investment, as well as more mature and complex properties with opportunities for our dedicated asset and project management teams to create value through more active operational oversight and targeted capital expenditures. Additionally, we generally seek properties that are unencumbered by debt and that will not require partnerships with third party investors, allowing us maximum operational flexibility. 3 • Drive Growth Through Aggressive Asset Management, In-House Project Management and Strategic Capital Investment. We believe that investing in our properties and employing a proactive asset management approach designed to identify investment strategies will optimize internal growth opportunities. Our management team’s extensive industry experience across multiple brands and management companies coupled with our integrated asset management and project management teams, enable us to identify and implement value-add strategies, prudently invest capital in our assets to optimize operating results and leverage best practices across our portfolio. - Aggressive Asset Management. Our experienced asset management team focuses on driving property performance through revenue enhancement and cost containment efforts. Our ability to work with a wide variety of management and franchise companies provides us with the opportunity to benchmark performance across our portfolio in order to share best practices. While we do not operate our hotel properties directly, and under the terms of our hotel management agreements our ability to participate in operating decisions regarding our hotels is limited, we conduct regular revenue, sales, and financial performance reviews and also perform in-depth on-site reviews focused on ongoing operating margin improvement initiatives. We interact frequently with our management companies and on-site management personnel, including conducting regular meetings with key executives of our management companies and brands. We work to maximize the value of our assets through all aspects of the hotel operation and ancillary real estate opportunities. - - In-House Project Management. By maintaining a dedicated in-house capital planning and project management team, we believe we are able to develop our capital plans and execute each renovation project at a lower cost and in a timelier manner than if we outsourced these services. In addition, our project management team has extensive experience in the ground-up development of hotel properties, providing both in-depth knowledge of building construction, as well as the opportunity for us to evaluate potential development opportunities. We view this as a significant competitive strength relative to many of our peers. Strategic Capital Investment to Enhance Portfolio Performance. As part of our ongoing asset management activities, we continuously review opportunities to reinvest in our hotels to maintain quality, increase long-term value and generate attractive returns on invested capital. We also may opportunistically dispose of hotels to take advantage of market conditions or in situations where the hotels no longer fit within our strategic objectives. We believe our breadth of experience and integrated in-house asset management and project management teams are instrumental in our ability to acquire and operate assets and to capitalize on redevelopment opportunities. Our Financing and Capital Strategy Over time, we intend to finance our long-term growth with issuances of common and preferred equity securities, as well as with debt financings having staggered maturities. Our debt includes a senior unsecured revolving credit facility, unsecured term loans, mortgage debt collateralized by our hotel properties or leasehold interests under the ground leases on our hotel properties, and may include other types of private and public debt in the future. We strive to maintain a flexible capital structure that puts us in a position to be nimble in allocating capital for investment. As of December 31, 2016, we had a total of $287.0 million of cash on hand, including $71.0 million of restricted cash primarily set aide to maintain our hotels. We have and seek to maintain a modest amount of leverage and closely monitor our near-term debt maturities. Our net debt to adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ratio as of December 31, 2016 was 3.1x. Our weighted average debt maturity was 4.7 years, including available extension options, and our debt had a weighted average interest rate of 3.24% as of December 31, 2016 (See “Part II-Item 7. Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for definition of net debt and reconciliation to net income). From time to time, we will also seek to create value for our stockholders by opportunistically repurchasing shares of our common stock at valuations we believe are attractive. We may also issue new equity or debt if we feel that we can accretively use proceeds to acquire assets or make capital improvements that yield attractive risk-adjusted returns on investment. We anticipate using a portion of cash flows generated from operations to fund future acquisitions as well as for property redevelopments, return on investment initiatives, working capital requirements, and share repurchase programs. Subject to market conditions, we intend to repay amounts outstanding under our senior unsecured revolving credit facility from time to time with proceeds from periodic common and preferred equity issuances, long-term debt financings, sale of assets, and cash flows from operations. 4 Competition The U.S. lodging industry is highly competitive. Our hotels compete with other hotels and alternative accommodation options for guests (e.g. those that are found on websites that facilitate short-term rentals of homes and apartments from owners) in each of their markets on the basis of several factors, including, among others, room rates, quality of accommodations, service levels and amenities, location, brand affiliation, reputation and reservation systems. Competition is often specific to the individual markets in which our hotels are located and includes competition from existing and new hotels and alternative accommodation options. We believe that hotels, such as our portfolio of hotels, that are affiliated with leading national brands, will enjoy the competitive advantages associated with operating under such brands. Increased competition could harm our occupancy and revenues and may require us to provide additional amenities, or make capital improvements that we otherwise would not have to make, and may materially and adversely affect our operating results and liquidity. We face competition for the acquisition of hotels from other REITs, private equity firms, institutional investors, hedge funds, specialty finance companies, insurance companies, governmental bodies, foreign investors and other entities. Some of these competitors have substantially greater financial and operational resources and access to capital than we have and may have greater knowledge of the markets in which we seek to invest. This competition may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us and decrease the attractiveness of the terms on which we may acquire our targeted hotel investments, including the cost thereof. In addition, these competitors seek financing through the same channels that we do. Therefore, we compete for funding in a market where funds for real estate investment may decrease, or grow at a rate that is less than the underlying demand. Seasonality The lodging industry is seasonal in nature which can be expected to cause fluctuations in our hotel room revenues, occupancy levels, room rates, operating expenses and cash flows. The periods during which our hotels experience higher or lower levels of demand vary from property to property and depend upon location, type of property, and competitive mix within the specific location. Generally, our revenues and operating income have been the lowest during the first and fourth quarter of each year, which we expect to be consistent from year to year for our current portfolio. Cyclicality The hospitality industry is cyclical and generally its growth or contraction follows the overall economy. There is a history of increases and decreases in demand for and supply of hotel rooms, in occupancy levels and in rates realized by owners of hotels through economic cycles. Variability of results through some of the cycles in the past has been more severe due to changes in the supply of hotel rooms in given markets or in given segments of hotels. The combination of changes in economic conditions and in the supply of hotel rooms can result in significant volatility in results for owners of hotel properties. The costs of running a hotel tend to be more fixed than variable. Because of this, in an environment of declining revenues the rate of decline in earnings will be higher than the rate of decline in revenues. Conversely, in an environment of increasing demand and room rates, the rate of increase in earnings is typically higher than the rate of increase in revenues. Regulations General Our hotels are subject to various U.S. federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to common areas and fire and safety requirements. We believe that each of our hotels has the necessary permits and approvals to operate its business. Americans with Disabilities Act Our hotels must comply with applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), to the extent that such hotels are “public accommodations” as defined by the ADA. The ADA may require removal of structural barriers to access by persons with disabilities in certain public areas of our hotels where such removal is readily achievable. We believe that our hotels are in substantial compliance with the ADA and that we will not be required to make substantial capital expenditures to address the requirements of the ADA. However, non-compliance with the ADA could result in imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. The obligation to make readily achievable accommodations is an ongoing one, and we will continue to assess our hotels and to make alterations as appropriate in this respect. 5 Environmental Matters Under various laws relating to the protection of the environment, a current or previous owner or operator (including tenants) of real estate may be liable for contamination resulting from the presence or discharge of hazardous or toxic substances at that property and may be required to investigate and clean up such contamination at that property or emanating from that property. These costs could be substantial and liability under these laws may attach without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the contaminants, and the liability may be joint and several. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination at our hotels may expose us to third-party liability or materially and adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or develop the real estate or to incur debt using the real estate as collateral. Our hotels are subject to various federal, state, and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that address a wide variety of issues, including, but not limited to, storage tanks, air emissions from emergency generators, storm water and wastewater discharges, lead-based paint, mold and mildew and waste management. Our hotels incur costs to comply with these laws and regulations and could be subject to fines and penalties for noncompliance. Some of our hotels contain asbestos-containing building materials. We believe that the asbestos is appropriately contained in accordance with current environmental regulations and that we have no need for any immediate remediation or current plans to remove the asbestos. Environmental laws require that owners or operators of buildings with asbestos-containing building materials properly manage and maintain these materials, adequately inform or train those who may come into contact with asbestos and undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, in the event that asbestos is disturbed during building renovation or demolition. These laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators for failure to comply with these requirements. In addition, third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos-containing building materials. Some of our hotels may contain or develop harmful mold or suffer from other adverse conditions, which could lead to liability for adverse health effects and costs of remediation. The presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants at any of our hotels could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold or other airborne contaminants from the affected hotel or increase indoor ventilation. In addition, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants could expose us to liability from guests or employees at our hotels and others if property damage or health concerns arise. Our Tax Status We elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“the Code”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, beginning with our short taxable year that commenced on January 5, 2015 and ended on February 3, 2015. We believe that we have been organized and have operated and will continue to operate in a manner that will allow us to maintain our REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with such short taxable year, and we intend to continue operating in such a manner. To qualify for REIT status, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we annually distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains. We conduct our business through a traditional umbrella partnership real estate investment trust, or UPREIT, in which our hotels are indirectly owned by our Operating Partnership, through subsidiary limited partnerships, limited liability companies or other legal entities. We own and control 100% of the sole general partner of our Operating Partnership and own, directly or indirectly, 98.7% of the Operating Partnership Units in our Operating Partnership, with the remaining 1.3% owned by our current and former executive officers and members of our Board of Directors. In the future, we may issue additional common or preferred units in our Operating Partnership from time to time in connection with acquisitions of hotels or for financing, compensation or other reasons. In order for the income from our hotel operations to constitute “rents from real property” for purposes of the gross income tests required for REIT qualification, we cannot directly or indirectly operate any of our hotels. Accordingly, we lease each of our hotels, and intend to lease any hotels we acquire in the future, to our TRS lessees. As required for our qualification as a REIT, our TRS lessees have engaged third-party hotel management companies to manage our hotels on market terms. Our TRS lessees pay rent to us that we intend to treat as “rents from real property”. Our TRS, which owns our TRS lessees, is subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes applicable to corporations. We have made a joint election with InvenTrust under section 336(e) of the Code with respect to our spin-off from InvenTrust on February 3, 2015. As a result of that election, our tax basis in our assets was stepped up to the fair market value of each respective asset as of the date of the spin-off. The increased tax basis in our assets will increase the depreciation deductions we are allowed to claim over the useful life of our assets. 6 Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer of Our Stock Our charter authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary or appropriate to enable us to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Furthermore, our charter prohibits any one person from actually or constructively owning more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock. Our Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt (prospectively or retroactively) a person from the ownership limits if certain conditions are satisfied. However, our Board of Directors may not grant an exemption from the ownership limits to any proposed transferee whose ownership, direct or indirect, in excess of 9.8% of the value or number of outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock, could jeopardize our status as a REIT. These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if our Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance with such restrictions is no longer required for us to qualify as a REIT. The ownership limits may delay or impede a transaction or a change of control that might be in our stockholders’ best interest. Insurance We or our management companies carry commercial general liability, commercial property including extended coverage and business interruption, cyber liability and umbrella liability coverage on all of our hotels and earthquake, wind, flood, hurricane and environmental coverage on hotels in areas where we believe such coverage is warranted, in each case with limits of liability that we deem adequate. Similarly, we are insured against the risk of direct physical damage in amounts we believe to be adequate to reimburse us, on a replacement basis, for costs incurred to repair or rebuild each hotel, including loss of income during the reconstruction period. We have selected policy specifications and insured limits which we believe to be appropriate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of coverage and industry practice. We do not carry insurance for generally uninsured losses, including, but not limited to, losses caused by riots, war or acts of God. We believe our hotels are adequately insured. Employees As of December 31, 2016, we had 49 employees. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Our third-party managers are responsible for hiring and maintaining the labor force at each of our hotels. Although we do not manage employees at our hotels, we are still subject to the many costs and risks generally associated with the labor at our hotels. Employees at certain of our third-party managed hotels are covered by collective bargaining agreements that are subject to review and renewal on a regular basis. For a discussion of these relationships, see “Part I-Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Business and Industry – We are subject to risks associated with the employment of hotel personnel, particularly with hotels that employ or may employ unionized labor, which could increase our operating costs, reduce the flexibility of our hotel managers to adjust the size of the workforce at our hotels and could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.” Where You Can Find More Information Our internet website is located at www.xeniareit.com. We make available free of charge through our website our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, all amendments to those reports and other filings as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC, and also make available on our website the charters for the audit, executive, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees of our Board of Directors and our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Copies in print of these documents are available upon request to our secretary at the address indicated on the cover of this Annual Report. We may also use our website as a distribution channel of material company information. Financial and other important information regarding the Company is routinely accessible through and posted on the “Investor Relations” page of our website. In addition, you may automatically receive email alerts and other information about the Company when you enroll your email address by visiting the “Investor Relations” page of our website. The information on our website is not a part of, nor is it incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report. Copies of any materials that we have filed with the SEC can be viewed at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information regarding the operations of the Public Reference Room can be obtained from the SEC by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Additionally, the SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and other information that we have filed with the SEC. The SEC website can be found at http://www.sec.gov. 7 Item 1A. Risk Factors In addition to the other information set forth in this Annual Report, you should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. Risks Related to Our Business and Industry Our ability to make distributions to our stockholders may be adversely affected by various operating risks common to the lodging industry, including competition, over building and dependence on business travel and tourism. We own hotels which have different economic characteristics than many other real estate assets. A typical office property, for example, has long-term leases with third-party tenants, which provides a relatively stable long-term stream of revenue. Hotels, on the other hand, generate revenue from guests that typically stay at the hotel for only a few nights, which causes the room rate and occupancy levels at each of our hotels to change every day, and results in earnings that can be highly volatile. In addition, our hotels will be subject to various operating risks common to the lodging industry, many of which are beyond our control, including, among others, the following: • changes in general economic conditions, including the severity and duration of any downturn in the U.S. or global economy and financial markets; • war, political conditions or civil unrest, terrorist activities or threats and heightened travel security measures instituted in response to these events; • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • outbreaks of pandemic or contagious diseases, such as norovirus, avian flu, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), H1N1 (swine flu), Ebola, and Zika virus; natural or man-made disasters, such as earthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes, hurricanes, typhoons, floods, oil spills, and nuclear incidents; delayed delivery or any material reduction or prolonged interruption of public utilities and services, including water and electric power; decreased corporate or government travel-related budgets and spending and cancellations, deferrals or renegotiations of group business due to adverse changes in general economic conditions and/or changes in laws and regulations; decreased need for business-related travel due to innovations in business-related technology; low consumer confidence, high levels of unemployment or depressed real estate prices; competition from other hotels and alternative accommodations in the markets in which we operate; over-building of hotels in the markets in which we operate, which results in increased supply and will adversely affect occupancy and revenues at our hotels; requirements for periodic capital reinvestment to repair and upgrade hotels; increases in operating costs due to inflation and other factors that may not be offset by increased room rates; change in interest rates and the availability, cost and terms of financing; the financial condition and general business condition of the airline, automotive and other transportation-related industries and its impact on travel; decreased airline capacities and routes; oil prices and travel costs; statements, actions or interventions by governmental officials related to travel and corporate travel-related activities and the resulting negative public perception of such travel and activities; and risks generally associated with the ownership of hotels and real estate, as we discuss in detail below. 8 These factors, and the reputational repercussions of these factors, can adversely affect, and from time to time have adversely affected, individual hotels, particular regions and our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. The lodging industry is highly cyclical in nature, and we cannot assure you how long the current lodging cycle will last. Due to its close link with the performance of the general economy, and, specifically, growth in U.S. GDP, the lodging industry is highly cyclical in nature. Demand for products and services provided by the lodging industry generally trails improvement in economic conditions, but since 2010 the lodging industry has recovered faster and stronger than the U.S. economy generally. There can be no assurance of either any further increase in demand for hotel rooms from past levels or of the timing or extent of any such demand growth in the future. If demand weakens, our operating results and profitability would likely be adversely affected. Worsening of the U.S. or global economy, if experienced, would likely have an adverse impact on the occupancy, ADR and RevPAR of our hotels, and would therefore adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, in an economic downturn, luxury, upper upscale and upscale hotels may be more susceptible to a decrease in revenue, as compared to hotels in other categories that have lower room rates. In addition to general economic conditions, new hotel room supply is an important factor that can affect the lodging industry’s performance and overbuilding has the potential to further exacerbate the negative impact of an economic downturn. Room rates and occupancy, and thus RevPAR, tend to increase when demand growth exceeds supply growth. A reduction or slowdown in growth of lodging demand or increased growth in lodging supply could result in returns that are substantially below expectations or result in losses, which could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth. The seasonality of the lodging industry is expected to cause quarterly fluctuations in our revenues. The lodging industry is seasonal in nature, which can be expected to cause quarterly fluctuations in our revenues, occupancy levels, room rates, operating expenses and cash flows. Our quarterly earnings may be adversely affected by factors outside our control, including timing of holidays, weather conditions and poor economic factors in certain markets in which we operate. The periods during which our hotels experience higher or lower levels of demand vary from property to property and depend upon location, type of property and competitive mix within the specific location. Based on historical results, we generally expect our revenue to be lower in the first and fourth quarter. We can provide no assurances that our cash flows will be sufficient to offset any shortfalls that occur as a result of these fluctuations. As a result, we may have to enter into short-term borrowings in certain quarters in order to make distributions to our stockholders, and we can provide no assurances that such borrowings will be available on favorable terms, if at all. Consequently, volatility in our financial performance resulting from the seasonality of the lodging industry could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We operate in a highly competitive industry. The lodging industry is highly competitive. Our hotels compete with other hotels and alternative accommodations (e.g. websites that facilitate the short-term rentals of homes and apartments from owners) based on a number of factors, including room rates, quality of accommodations, service levels and amenities, location, brand affiliation, reputation and reservation systems. New hotels may be constructed and these additions to supply create new competitors, in some cases without corresponding increases in demand for hotel rooms. Some of our competitors also have greater financial and marketing resources than we do, which could allow them to reduce their rates, offer greater convenience, services or amenities, build new hotels in direct competition with our existing hotels, improve their properties, expand and improve their marketing efforts, all of which could adversely affect the ability of our hotels to attract prospective guests and materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth. In addition, travelers can book stays on websites that facilitate the short-term rental of homes and apartments from owners, thereby providing an alternative to hotel rooms. We also compete for hotel acquisitions with entities that have similar investment objectives as we do. This competition could limit the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us. It may also increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell to us, making it more difficult for us to acquire new properties on attractive terms or on the terms contemplated in our business plan. There are inherent risks with investments in real estate, including the relative liquidity of such investments. Investments in real estate are subject to varying degrees of risk. For example, an investment in real estate cannot generally be quickly sold, and we cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any hotel we desire to for the price or on the terms set by us or acceptable to us, or the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of the hotel. Moreover, the Code 9 imposes restrictions on a REIT’s ability to dispose of properties that are not applicable to other types of real estate companies. In particular, the tax laws applicable to REITs require that we hold our hotels for investment, rather than primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forego or defer sales of hotels that otherwise would be in our best interests. Therefore, we may not be able to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions and dispose of assets at opportune times or on favorable terms, which may adversely affect our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to stockholders. In addition, our ability to dispose of some of our hotels could be constrained by their tax attributes. Hotels that we own for a significant period of time or that we acquire through tax-deferred contribution transactions in exchange for Operating Partnership Units in our Operating Partnership may have low tax bases. If we dispose of these hotels outright in taxable transactions, we may be required to distribute the taxable gain to our stockholders under the requirements of the Code applicable to REITs or to pay tax on that gain, either of which, in turn, would impact our cash flow and increase our leverage. In some cases, we may be restricted from disposing of properties contributed to us in the future in exchange for our Operating Partnership Units under tax protection agreements with contributors unless we incur additional costs related to indemnifying those contributors. To dispose of low basis or tax-protected hotels efficiently, we may from time to time use like-kind exchanges, which qualify for non-recognition of taxable gain, but can be difficult to consummate and result in the hotel for which the disposed assets are exchanged inheriting their low tax bases and other tax attributes. Investments in real estate also are subject to adverse changes in general economic conditions. Among the factors that could impact our hotels and the value of an investment in us are: • • • • • • • • risks associated with the possibility that cost increases will outpace revenue increases and that in the event of an economic slowdown, the high proportion of fixed costs will make it difficult to reduce costs to the extent required to offset declining revenues; changes in tax laws and property taxes, or an increase in the assessed valuation of a property for real estate tax purposes; adverse changes in the federal, state or local laws and regulations applicable to us, including those affecting zoning, fuel and energy consumption, water and environmental restrictions, and the related costs of compliance; changing market demographics; an inability to acquire and finance real estate assets on favorable terms, if at all; the ongoing need for owner funded capital improvements and expenditures to maintain or upgrade hotels; fluctuations in real estate values or potential impairments in the value of our assets; acts of God, such as earthquakes, floods or other uninsured losses; • war, political conditions or civil unrest, terrorist activities or threats and heightened travel security measures instituted in response to these events; and • changes in interest rates and availability, cost and terms of financing. Difficult economic conditions may continue to adversely affect the hotel industry. The performance of the hotel industry has historically been linked to key macroeconomic indicators, such as GDP growth, employment, corporate earnings and investment, and travel demand. If the U.S. economy should falter for any reason, including but not limited to the volatility in the energy industry, and there is an extended period of economic weakness, a recession or depression, our results of operations and profitability would likely be adversely affected. We are dependent on the performance of the third-party hotel management companies that manage the operations of each of our hotels and could be materially and adversely affected if such third-party managers do not properly manage our hotels or otherwise act in our best interests. In order for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT, third parties must operate our hotels. We lease each of our hotels to our TRS lessees. Our TRS lessees, in turn, have entered into management agreements with third party management companies to operate our hotels. We could be materially and adversely affected if any of our third-party managers fail to provide quality services and amenities, fail to maintain a quality brand name or otherwise fail to manage our hotels in our best interest, and we 10 can be financially responsible for the actions and inactions of our third-party managers pursuant to our management agreements. In addition, our hotel managers or their affiliates may manage, and in some cases may own, may have invested in or may have provided credit support or operating guarantees to hotels that compete with our hotels, any of which could result in conflicts of interest. As a result, our hotel managers may make decisions regarding competing lodging facilities that are not in our best interests. From time to time, disputes may arise between us and our third-party managers regarding their performance or compliance with the terms of the hotel management agreements, which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations. If we are unable to reach satisfactory results through discussions and negotiations, we may choose to terminate our management agreement, litigate the dispute, or submit the matter to third-party dispute resolution, the outcome of which may be unfavorable to us. Under the terms of the hotel management agreements, our ability to participate in operating decisions regarding our hotels is limited to certain matters, including approval of the annual operating budget, and we do not have the specific authority to require any hotel to be operated in a particular manner. While our TRS lessees closely monitor the performance of our third-party managers, our general recourse under most of the hotel management agreements is limited to termination if our third-party managers are not performing adequately. For example, in many of our hotel management agreements, we have a right to terminate a management agreement if the third-party manager fails to achieve certain hotel performance criteria measured over any two consecutive fiscal years, as outlined in the applicable management agreement. However, even if a third-party manager fails to perform under the terms of its respective management agreement, it generally has the option to avoid a performance termination by paying a performance deficit fee as specified in the applicable management agreement. In the event that we terminate any of our management agreements, we can provide no assurances that we could find a replacement manager or that any replacement manager will be successful in operating our hotels. In addition, many of our existing franchise agreements provide the franchisor with a right of first offer in the event of certain sales or transfers of a hotel and provide that the franchisor has the right to approve any change in the hotel management company engaged to manage the hotel. If any of the foregoing were to occur, it could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition. Restrictive covenants in certain of our hotel management and franchise agreements contain provisions limiting or restricting the sale of our hotels, which could materially and adversely affect our profitability. Hotel management and franchise agreements typically contain restrictive covenants that limit or restrict our ability to sell a hotel without the consent of the hotel management company or franchisor. Many of our franchise agreements provide the franchisor with a right of first offer in the event of certain sales or transfers of a hotel and provide that the franchisor has the right to approve any change in the hotel management company engaged to manage the hotel. Generally, we may not agree to sell, lease or otherwise transfer particular hotels unless the transferee executes a new agreement or assumes the related hotel management and franchise agreements. If the hotel management company or franchisor does not consent to the sale of our hotels, we may be prohibited from taking actions that would otherwise be in our and our stockholders’ best interests. Contractual and other disagreements with or involving third-party hotel management companies and franchisors could make us liable to them or result in litigation costs or other expenses. Our management and franchise agreements require us and third-party hotel managers and franchisors to comply with operational and performance conditions that are subject to interpretation and could result in disagreements. At any given time, we may be in dispute with one or more hotel management companies or franchisors regarding various terms of our agreements. Any such dispute could be very expensive for us, even if the outcome is ultimately in our favor. We cannot predict the outcome of any arbitration or litigation, the effect of any negative judgment against us or the amount of any settlement that we may enter into with any third-party. In the event we terminate a management or franchise agreement early and the manager or franchisor considers such termination to have been wrongful, they may seek damages. Additionally, we may be required to indemnify our third-party hotel managers and franchisors against disputes with third parties, pursuant to our management and franchise agreements. An adverse result in any of these proceedings could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability. If we are unable to maintain good relationships with third-party hotel managers and franchisors, profitability could decrease and our growth potential may be adversely affected. The success of our respective hotel investments and the value of our franchised properties largely depend on our ability to establish and maintain good relationships with the third-party hotel managers and franchisors of our respective hotel management and franchise agreements. If we are unable to maintain good relationships with third-party hotel managers and franchisors, we may be unable to renew existing management or franchise agreements or expand relationships with them. Additionally, opportunities for developing new relationships with additional third-party managers or franchisors may be adversely affected. This, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and our ability to execute our growth strategy. 11 If third-party hotel managers and/or franchisors consolidate through merger and acquisition transactions, we may experience undefined and unknown costs related to the integration of processes and systems, which may adversely affect our hotels. The result of third-party hotel managers and franchisors consolidating could adversely affect our hotels due to the undefined and unknown costs associated with the integration of property-level point of sale and back-of-house computer systems and other technology related processes, the training and other labor costs associated with the merging of labor forces, and the impact of reward point program consolidation. Additionally, the potential consolidation of third-party hotel managers and franchisors could impact our leveraging power in future management and franchise agreement negotiations. Costs associated with, or failure to maintain, brand operating standards may materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability. Under the terms of our franchise agreements, and certain of our management agreements, we are required to meet specified operating standards and other terms and conditions and compliance with such standards may be costly. We expect that our franchisors will periodically inspect our hotels to ensure that we and the hotel management companies follow brand standards. Failure by us, or any hotel management company that we engage, to maintain these standards or other terms and conditions could result in a franchise license being canceled or the franchisor requiring us to undertake a costly property improvement program. If a franchise license is terminated due to our failure to make required improvements or to otherwise comply with its terms, we also may be liable to the franchisor for a termination payment, which will vary by franchisor and by hotel. If the funds required to maintain brand operating standards are significant, or if a franchise license is terminated, it could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability. If we were to lose a brand license at one or more of our hotels, the value of the affected hotels could decline significantly and we could incur significant costs to obtain new franchise licenses, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth. If we were to lose a brand license, the underlying value of a particular hotel could decline significantly from the loss of associated name recognition, marketing support, participation in guest loyalty programs and the centralized reservation system provided by the franchisor or brand manager, which could require us to recognize an impairment on the hotel. Furthermore, the loss of a franchise license at a particular hotel could harm our relationship with the franchisor or brand manager, which could impede our ability to operate other hotels under the same brand, limit our ability to obtain new franchise licenses or brand management agreements from the franchisor or brand in the future on favorable terms, or at all, and cause us to incur significant costs to obtain a new franchise license or brand management agreement for the particular hotel. Accordingly, if we lose one or more franchise licenses or brand management agreements, it could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth. A substantial number of our hotels operate under the Marriott, Kimpton and Hyatt brand families; therefore, we are subject to risks associated with concentrating our portfolio in three brand families. In our portfolio, 36 of the 42 hotels that we own as of December 31, 2016 operate under brands owned by Marriott, Kimpton and Hyatt. As a result, our success is dependent in part on the continued success of Marriott, Kimpton and Hyatt and their respective brands. We believe that building brand value is critical to increase demand and build customer loyalty. Consequently, if market recognition or the positive perception of Marriott, Kimpton and/or Hyatt brands is reduced or compromised, the goodwill associated with the Marriott-, Kimpton- and/or Hyatt-branded hotels in our portfolio may be adversely affected. Furthermore, if our relationship with Marriott, Kimpton and/or Hyatt were to deteriorate or terminate as a result of disputes regarding the management of our hotels or for other reasons, Marriott, Kimpton and/or Hyatt could, under certain circumstances, terminate our current franchise licenses with them or decline to provide franchise licenses for hotels that we may acquire in the future. If any of the foregoing were to occur, it could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth and impair our ability to compete effectively. We have a concentration of hotels in Texas and California, which exposes our business to the effects of regional events and occurrences. We have a concentration of hotels in Texas and California. Specifically, as of December 31, 2016, approximately 44% of rooms in our portfolio were located in Texas and California. The concentration of hotels in a region may expose us to risks of adverse economic developments, such as negative trends in the industry sectors that are concentrated in these markets, that are greater than if our portfolio were more geographically diverse. These economic developments include regional economic downturns, significant increases in the number of competitive hotels in these markets and potentially higher local property, sales and income taxes in the geographic markets in which we are concentrated. The continued volatility in the energy industry and new supply has 12 significantly affected demand and RevPAR in certain markets in Texas, including Houston where three of our hotels are located, and has adversely affected our business in those markets. A further decline could further adversely affect our business and operating results in those markets. In addition, our hotels are subject to the effects of adverse acts of nature, such as winter storms, hail storms, strong winds, tropical storms, hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, and tsunamis which have in the past caused damage such as flooding and other damage to our hotels in specific geographic locations, including in the Texas and California markets. Depending on the severity of these acts of nature, the damage to our hotels could require closure of all or substantially all of our hotels in one or more markets for a period of time while the necessary repairs and renovations, as applicable, are undertaken. Additionally, we cannot assure you that the amount of hurricane, windstorm, earthquake, flood or other casualty insurance maintained for these hotels from time to time would entirely cover damages caused by any such event. As a result of this geographic concentration of hotels, we will face a greater risk of a negative impact on our revenues in the event these areas are more severely impacted by adverse economic and competitive conditions and extreme weather than other areas in the United States. The departure of any of our key personnel who have significant experience and relationships in the lodging industry could materially and adversely impede or impair our ability to compete effectively and limit future growth prospects. We depend on the experience and relationships of our senior management team to manage our day-to-day operations and strategic business direction. Our senior management team has an extensive network of lodging industry contacts and relationships, including relationships with global and national hotel brands, hotel owners, financiers, operators, commercial real estate brokers, developers and management companies. We can provide no assurances that any of our key personnel will continue their employment with us. The loss of services of our senior management team, or any difficulty attracting and retaining other talented and experienced personnel, could adversely affect our ability to source potential investment opportunities, our relationship with global and national hotel brands and other industry participants and the execution of our business strategy. Further, such a loss could be negatively perceived by financial analysts and the investment community, which could reduce the market value of our common stock. Our long-term growth depends in part on successfully identifying and consummating acquisitions of additional hotels and the failure to make such acquisitions could materially impede our growth. A key element of our business strategy is to invest in premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotels, with a focus on the Top 25 Markets and key leisure destinations in the U.S. We can provide no assurances that we will be successful in identifying attractive hotels or that, once identified, we will be successful in consummating an acquisition. We face significant competition for attractive investment opportunities from other well-capitalized investors, some of which have greater financial resources and a greater access to debt and equity capital to acquire hotels than we do. This competition increases as investments in real estate become increasingly attractive relative to other forms of investment. As a result of such competition, we may be unable to acquire certain hotels that we deem attractive or the purchase price may be significantly elevated or other terms may be substantially more onerous. In addition, we expect to finance future acquisitions through a combination of borrowings under our senior unsecured revolving credit facility and unsecured term loans, mortgage loans, the use of retained cash flows, and offerings of equity and debt securities, which may not be available on advantageous terms, or at all. Any delay or failure on our part to identify, negotiate, finance on favorable terms, consummate and integrate such acquisitions could materially impede our growth. Our acquisition, redevelopment, repositioning, renovation and re-branding activities are subject to various risks, any of which could, among other things, result in disruptions to our hotel operations, strain management resources and materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth. We intend to acquire, redevelop, reposition, renovate and re-brand hotels, subject to the availability of attractive hotels or projects and our ability to undertake such activities on satisfactory terms. In deciding whether to undertake such activities, we will make certain assumptions regarding the expected future performance of the hotel or project. However, newly acquired, redeveloped, renovated, repositioned or re-branded hotels may fail to perform as expected and the costs necessary to bring such hotels up to brand standards may exceed our expectations, which may result in the hotels’ failure to achieve projected returns. In particular, to the extent that we engage in the activities described above, they could pose the following risks to our ongoing operations: • we may abandon such activities and may be unable to recover expenses already incurred in connection with exploring such opportunities; • acquired, redeveloped, renovated or re-branded hotels may not initially be accretive to our results, and we and the hotel management companies may not successfully manage newly acquired, renovated, redeveloped, repositioned or re-branded hotels to meet our expectations; 13 • we may be unable to quickly, effectively and efficiently integrate new acquisitions, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of hotels, into our existing operations; • our redevelopment, repositioning, renovation or re-branding activities may not be completed on schedule, which could result in increased debt service and other costs and lower revenues; and • management attention may be diverted by our acquisition, redevelopment, repositioning or re-branding activities, which in some cases may turn out to be less compatible with our growth strategy than originally anticipated. The occurrence of any of the foregoing events, among others, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth. Any difficulties in obtaining capital necessary to make required periodic capital expenditures and renovation of our hotels could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Ownership of hotels is a capital intensive business that requires significant capital expenditures to operate, maintain and renovate properties. Access to the capital that we need to maintain and renovate existing properties and to acquire new properties is critical to the continued growth of our business and revenues and to remain competitive. We may not be able to fund capital improvements for our existing hotels or acquisitions of new hotels solely from cash provided from our operating activities because we must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to maintain our qualification as a REIT and we are subject to tax on any retained income and gains. As a result, our ability to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions or hotel redevelopment through retained earnings may be restricted. Consequently, we may have to draw down on our senior unsecured revolving credit facility, enter into new unsecured loans or rely upon the availability of debt or equity capital to fund capital improvements and acquisitions. Our ability to access additional capital could also be limited by the terms of our senior unsecured revolving credit facility, which restricts our ability to incur debt under certain circumstances. If we are forced to spend larger amounts of cash from operating activities than anticipated to operate, maintain or renovate existing properties, then our ability to use cash for other purposes, including acquisitions of new properties, could be limited and our profits could be reduced. Similarly, if we cannot access the capital we need to fund our operations or implement our growth strategy, we may need to postpone or cancel planned renovations or acquisitions, which could impair our ability to compete effectively and harm our business and relationship with certain operators and/or brands. Many real estate costs and certain hotel operating costs are fixed, even if revenue from our hotels decreases. Many costs, such as real estate taxes, insurance premiums, maintenance costs and certain hotel operating costs generally are more fixed than variable and as a result, are not reduced even when a hotel is not fully occupied, room rates decrease or other circumstances cause a reduction in revenues. Thus, our profits are generally more significantly affected by economic downturns and declines in revenues. If we are unable to offset these costs with sufficient revenues across our portfolio, it could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability. Operating expenses may increase in the future, which may cause our cash flow and our operating results to decrease. Operating expenses, such as expenses for fuel, utilities, labor, employee benefits, building materials and insurance are not fixed and may increase in the future. Any increases would cause our cash flow and our operating results to decrease. If we are unable to offset these decreases with sufficient revenues across our portfolio, it could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability and our ability to pay distributions could be materially and adversely affected. The land underlying five of our hotels and/or meeting facilities is subject to a ground lease; if we are found to be in breach of a ground lease or are unable to renew a ground lease, we could be materially and adversely affected. We lease the land underlying five of our hotels and/or meeting facilities from third parties. Four of these hotels are subject to ground leases that cover all of the land underlying the respective hotel, and the fifth is subject to a ground lease that covers a portion of the land. Accordingly, we only own a long-term leasehold or similar interest in all or a portion of these five hotels. The average remaining term of the ground leases, assuming no renewal options are exercised, is approximately 46 years. Assuming all renewal options are exercised, the average remaining term is 64 years. If we are found to be in breach of a ground lease, we could lose the right to use the hotel. In addition, unless we can purchase a fee interest in the underlying land and improvements or extend the terms of these leases before their expiration, as to which no assurance can be given, we will lose our right to operate these properties and our interest in the improvements upon expiration of the leases. Our ability to exercise any extension options relating to our ground leases is subject to the condition that we are not in default under the terms of the ground lease at the time that we exercise such options, and we can provide no assurances that we will be able to exercise any available options at such 14 time. Furthermore, we can provide no assurances that we will be able to renew any ground lease upon its expiration. If we were to lose the right to use a hotel due to a breach or non-renewal of the ground lease, we would be unable to derive income from such hotel, which may materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We will not recognize any increase in the value of the land or improvements subject to our ground leases and may only receive a portion of compensation paid in any eminent domain proceeding with respect to the hotel. Unless we purchase a fee interest in the land and improvements subject to our ground leases, we will not have any economic interest in the land or improvements at the expiration of our ground leases and therefore we will not share in any increase in value of the land or improvements beyond the term of a ground lease, notwithstanding our capital outlay to purchase our interest in the hotel or fund improvements thereon, and will lose our right to use the hotel. Furthermore, if the state or federal government seizes a hotel subject to a ground lease under its eminent domain power, we may only be entitled to a portion of any compensation awarded for the seizure. We are subject to risks associated with the employment of hotel personnel, particularly with hotels that employ or may employ unionized labor, which could increase our operating costs, reduce the flexibility of our hotel managers to adjust the size of the workforce at our hotels and could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability. We have entered into management agreements with third-party hotel managers to operate our hotels. Our hotel managers are responsible for hiring and maintaining the labor force at each of our hotels. Although we do not employ or manage employees at our hotels, we are subject to many of the costs and risks generally associated with the hotel labor force. Increased labor costs due to factors like minimum wage initiatives and additional taxes or requirements to incur additional employee benefits costs, including the requirements of the Affordable Care Act, may adversely impact our operating costs. Labor costs can be particularly challenging at those of our hotels with unionized labor. From time to time, strikes, lockouts, boycotts, public demonstrations or other negative actions and publicity may disrupt hotel operations at any of our hotels, negatively impact our reputation or the reputation of our brands, cause us to lose guests, or harm relationships with the labor forces at our hotels. We also may incur increased legal costs and indirect labor costs as a result of contract disputes or other events. Additionally, hotels where our managers have collective bargaining agreements with employees could be affected more significantly by labor force activities than others. The resolution of labor disputes or new or re-negotiated labor contracts could lead to increased labor costs, either by increases in wages or benefits or by changes in work rules that raise hotel operating costs. Furthermore, labor agreements may limit the ability of our hotel managers to reduce the size of hotel workforces during an economic downturn because collective bargaining agreements are negotiated between the hotel managers and labor unions. We do not have the ability to control the outcome of these negotiations. Additional hotels or additional departments within our hotels or groups of employees may become subject to additional collective bargaining agreements in the future. Additionally, hotels we currently own or may own in the future could be subject to collective bargaining agreements due to various factors including, but not limited to, consolidation of third party hotel managers. Potential changes in the federal regulatory scheme could make it easier for unions to organize groups of our third-party hotel managers’ employees. If such changes take effect, more hotel personnel could be subject to increased organizational efforts, which could potentially lead to disruptions or require more of our management’s time to address unionization issues. Negotiations of collective bargaining agreements, attempts by labor organizations to organize additional hotels, departments within our hotels or groups of employees or changes in labor laws could disrupt our operations, increase our labor costs or interfere with the ability of our management to focus on executing our business strategies. Uninsured and underinsured losses at our hotels could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability. We intend to maintain comprehensive insurance on each of our current hotels and any hotels that we acquire, including liability, fire and extended coverage, of the type and amount we believe are customarily obtained for or by hotel owners. There are no assurances that coverage will be available at reasonable rates. Various types of catastrophic losses, like windstorms, earthquakes and floods, and losses from foreign terrorist activities may not be insurable or may not be economically insurable. Even when insurable, these policies may have high deductibles and/or high premiums. Lenders may require such insurance at our sole cost. Our failure to obtain such insurance could constitute a default under loan agreements, and/or our lenders may force us to obtain such insurance at unfavorable rates, which could materially and adversely affect our profitability and revenues. In the event of a substantial loss, our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover the full current market value or replacement cost of our lost investment. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a hotel, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the hotel. In that event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the hotel. Inflation, changes in 15 building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors might also keep us from using insurance proceeds to replace or renovate a hotel after it has been damaged or destroyed. Under those circumstances, the insurance proceeds we receive might be inadequate to restore our economic position on the damaged or destroyed hotel, which could materially and adversely affect our profitability. In addition, insurance risks associated with potential terrorism acts could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. With the enactment of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007, United States insurers cannot exclude conventional, chemical, biological, nuclear and radiation terrorism losses. These insurers must make terrorism insurance available under their property and casualty insurance policies; however, this legislation does not regulate the pricing of such insurance. In many cases, mortgage lenders have begun to insist that commercial property owners purchase coverage against terrorism as a condition of providing mortgage loans. Such insurance policies may not be available at a reasonable cost, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our hotels. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We may not have adequate coverage for such losses, which could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth. We could incur significant, material costs related to government regulation and litigation with respect to environmental matters, which could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth. Our hotels are subject to various U.S. federal, state and local environmental laws that impose liability for contamination. Under these laws, governmental entities have the authority to require us, as the current owner of a hotel, to perform or pay for the clean-up of contamination (including hazardous substances, asbestos and asbestos-containing materials, waste or petroleum products) at, on, under or emanating from the hotel and to pay for natural resource damages arising from such contamination. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator or other responsible party knew of, or caused such contamination, and the liability may be joint and several. Because these laws also impose liability on persons who owned a property at the time it became contaminated, it is possible we could incur cleanup costs or other environmental liabilities even after we sell hotels. Contamination at, on, under or emanating from our hotels also may expose us to liability to private parties for costs of remediation and/or personal injury or property damage. In addition, environmental laws may create liens on contaminated sites in favor of the government for damages and costs it incurs to address such contamination. If contamination is discovered on our properties, environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which the properties may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. Moreover, environmental contamination can affect the value of a property and, therefore, an owner’s ability to borrow funds using the property as collateral or to sell the property on favorable terms or at all. Furthermore, persons who sent waste to a waste disposal facility, such as a landfill or an incinerator, may be liable for costs associated with cleanup of that facility. In addition, our hotels are subject to various federal, state, and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that address a wide variety of issues, including, but not limited to, storage tanks, air emissions from emergency generators, storm water and wastewater discharges, lead-based paint, mold and mildew, and waste management. Some of our hotels routinely handle and use hazardous or regulated substances and wastes as part of their operations, which substances and wastes are subject to regulation (e.g., swimming pool chemicals). Our hotels incur costs to comply with these environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and could be subject to fines and penalties for non-compliance with applicable requirements. Certain of our hotels contain, and those that we acquire in the future may contain, or may have contained, asbestos-containing material, or “ACM.” Federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws require that ACM be properly managed and maintained, and include requirements to undertake special precautions, such as removal or abatement, if ACM would be disturbed during maintenance, renovation or demolition of a building. Such laws regarding ACM may impose fines and penalties on building owners, employers and operators for failure to comply with these requirements. In addition, third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos-containing building materials. When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Indoor air quality issues can also stem from inadequate ventilation, chemical contamination from indoor or outdoor sources, and other biological contaminants such as pollen, viruses and bacteria. Indoor exposure to airborne toxins or irritants above certain levels can be alleged to cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants at any of our hotels could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold or other airborne contaminants from the affected property or increase indoor ventilation. In addition, the presence of significant mold or other airborne contaminants could expose us to liability to third parties if property damage or personal injury occurs. 16 Liabilities and costs associated with environmental contamination at, on, under or emanating from our properties, defending against claims related to alleged or actual environmental issues, or complying with environmental, health and safety laws could be material and could materially and adversely affect us. We can make no assurances that changes in current laws or regulations or future laws or regulations will not impose additional or new material environmental liabilities or that the current environmental condition of our hotels will not be affected by our operations, the condition of the properties in the vicinity of our hotels, or by third parties unrelated to us. The discovery of material environmental liabilities at our properties could subject us to unanticipated significant costs, which could significantly reduce or eliminate our profitability and the cash available for distribution to our stockholders. Compliance or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other safety regulations and requirements could result in substantial costs. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Accessibility Guidelines promulgated thereunder, which we refer to collectively as the ADA, all public accommodations must meet various federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Compliance with the ADA’s requirements could require removal of access barriers, and non-compliance could result in the U.S. government imposing fines or in private litigants winning damages. Our hotels also are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could incur fines or private damage awards. We do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether compliance with future requirements would require significant unanticipated expenditures that would affect our cash flow and results of operations. If we incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA or other safety regulations and requirements, it could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability. We may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities related to recently acquired hotels and the hotels that we may acquire in the future or hotels recently divested or that we may divest in the future, which could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability growth. Our recently acquired or divested hotels, and the hotels that we may acquire or divest in the future, may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities for which we may have no recourse, or only limited recourse, against the sellers. In general, the representations and warranties provided under the transaction agreements related to the sale or purchase of the hotels we acquire may survive for a defined period of time after the completion of the transactions. Furthermore, indemnification under such agreements may be limited and subject to various materiality thresholds, a significant deductible or an aggregate cap on losses. As a result, there is no guarantee that we will recover any amounts with respect to losses due to breaches by the sellers of their representations and warranties. In addition, the total amount of costs and expenses that may be incurred with respect to liabilities associated with these hotels to buyers may exceed our expectations, and we may experience other unanticipated adverse effects, all of which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and profitability. The acquisition and/or sale of a hotel or a portfolio of hotels is typically subject to contingencies, risks and uncertainties, any of which may cause us to be unsuccessful in completing the acquisition and/or disposition. We may not be successful in completing the acquisitions and/or disposition of a hotel or a portfolio of hotels, which may negatively impact our business strategy. Hotel acquisitions and sales are typically subject to customary risks and uncertainties. In addition, there may be contingencies related to, among other items, financing, franchise agreements, ground leases and other agreements. As such, we can offer no assurances as to whether any closing conditions will be satisfied on a timely basis or at all, or whether the closing of an acquisition and/or a sale will occur for these or any other reasons. Adverse judgments or settlements resulting from legal proceedings in which we may be involved in the normal course of our business could reduce our profits or limit our ability to operate our business. In the normal course of our business, we are involved in various legal proceedings. Our third-party managers, whom we indemnify for certain legal costs resulting from management of our hotels, may also be involved in various legal proceedings relating to the management of our hotels. The outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted. If any of these proceedings were to be determined adversely to us or our third-party managers or a settlement involving a payment of a material sum of money were to occur, it could materially and adversely affect our profits or ability to operate our business. Additionally, we could become the subject of future claims by third parties, including current or former third-party property owners, guests who use our properties, our employees, our investors or regulators. Any significant adverse judgments or settlements would reduce our profits and could limit our ability to operate our business. Further, we may incur costs related to claims for which we have appropriate third party indemnity, but such third parties fail to fulfill their contractual obligations. 17 Market disruptions may adversely impact many aspects of our operating results and operating condition. During the global economic downturn that began in 2008, the domestic financial markets experienced unusual volatility, uncertainty and a tightening of liquidity in both the debt and equity capital markets. Credit spreads for major sources of capital widened significantly during the U.S. credit crisis as investors demanded a higher risk premium. If there is volatility and weakness in the capital and credit markets, the availability of debt financing could decline. Our business may be affected by market and economic challenges experienced by the U.S. or global economy or real estate industry as a whole or by the local economic conditions in the markets in which our hotels are located, including the dislocations in the credit markets and general global economic recession. For the following and other reasons, we cannot assure you that we will be profitable or that we will realize growth in the value of our investments. Specifically, these conditions may have the following consequences: • • • • • • credit spreads for major sources of capital may widen if stockholders demand higher risk premiums or interest rates could increase, due to inflationary expectations, resulting in an increased cost for debt financing; our ability to borrow on terms and conditions that we find acceptable may be limited, which could result in our hotels generating lower overall economic returns and a reduced level of cash flow from what was anticipated at the time we acquired the asset, which could potentially impact our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, or pursue acquisition opportunities, among other things; the amount of capital that is available to finance hotels could diminish, which, in turn, could lead to a decline in hotel values generally, slow hotel transaction activity, and reduce the loan to value ratio upon which lenders are willing to lend; the value of certain of our hotels may decrease below the amounts we paid for them, which would limit our ability to dispose of hotels at attractive prices or to obtain debt financing secured by these hotels and could reduce our ability to finance our business; the value and liquidity of short-term investments, if any, could be reduced as a result of the dislocation of the markets for our short-term investments and increased volatility in market rates for these investments or other factors; and one or more counterparties to derivative financial instruments that we may enter into could default on their obligations to us, or could fail, increasing the risk that we may not realize the benefits of these instruments. We are increasingly dependent on information technology, and potential cyber-attacks, security problems, or other disruptions present risks. The third-party hotel management companies that operate our hotels rely on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes, including financial transactions and records, personal identifying information, reservations, billing and operating data. They may purchase some of their information technology from vendors, on whom our systems will depend, and the third-party hotel managers will rely on commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide security for processing, transmission and storage of confidential operator and other customer information, including personally identifiable information. We will depend upon the secure transmission of this information over public networks. Our third-party hotel management companies’ networks and storage applications have already been, according to publicly released statements, and in the future may be subject to unauthorized access by hackers or others through cyber-attacks, which are rapidly evolving and becoming increasingly sophisticated, or by other means, or may be breached due to operator error, malfeasance or other system disruptions. In some cases, it will be difficult to anticipate or immediately detect such incidents and the damage caused thereby. Any significant breakdown, invasion, destruction, interruption or leakage of our third-party hotel managers’ systems could harm us, and we may be financially responsible for certain damages arising out of the harm such events cause to third parties pursuant to our management agreements. As a result, such incidents could have a material impact on our business and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Certain of our third-party hotel management companies have publicly released statements disclosing cyber-attacks on their systems, some of which have impacted our hotels, but these known cyber-attacks did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations. Changes in distribution channels, including the increasing use of intermediaries by consumers and companies may adversely affect our profitability. Our rooms are booked through a variety of distribution channels, including hotel websites, travel agents, internet travel intermediaries and meeting procurement firms. If bookings shift to higher cost distribution channels, including internet travel intermediaries and meeting procurement firms, it could materially impact our profits. Additionally, as intermediary bookings 18 increase, these intermediaries may be able to obtain higher commissions, reduced room rates or other significant contract concessions from our brands and management companies. Many of these internet travel intermediaries are viewed as offering hotel rooms in a commodity-like manner, by increasing the importance of price and general indicators of quality (such as “three- star downtown hotel”) at the expense of brand identification. It is possible that consumers and companies will develop brand loyalties to their reservations systems and multi-brand representation rather than to the brands under which our properties are operated. Although most of the business for our hotels is expected to be derived from traditional channels, if the amount of sales made through the intermediaries increases significantly, room revenues may be lower than expected, and/or expenses may be higher which would adversely affect our profitability. Risks Related to Our Relationship with InvenTrust and the Separation Our historical financial results as a subsidiary of InvenTrust may not be representative of our results as a separate, stand- alone company. The historical financial information prior to our spin-off that we have included in this Annual Report has been derived from InvenTrust’s consolidated financial statements and does not necessarily reflect what our financial position, results of operations or cash flows would have been had we been a separate, stand-alone company during the periods presented. Although InvenTrust did account for our company as a subsidiary, InvenTrust did not account for us, and we were not operated, as a separate, stand- alone company for the historical periods presented. The historical costs and expenses reflected in our combined consolidated financial statements include an allocation for certain corporate functions historically provided by InvenTrust including general corporate expenses, employee benefits and incentives, and interest expense. These allocations were based on what we and InvenTrust considered to be reasonable reflections of the historical utilization levels of these services required in support of our business. The historical information does not necessarily indicate what our results of operations, financial position, cash flows or costs and expenses will be in the future. We may have potential business conflicts of interest with InvenTrust with respect to our past and ongoing relationships. Conflicts of interest may arise between InvenTrust and us in a number of areas relating to our past and ongoing relationships, including: • • • • • • labor, tax, employee benefit, indemnification and other matters arising from our separation from InvenTrust; intellectual property matters; employee recruiting and retention; sales or distributions by InvenTrust of all or any portion of its ownership interest in us, which could be to one of our competitors; business combinations involving our company; and business opportunities that may be attractive to both InvenTrust and us. We may not be able to resolve any potential conflicts, and, even if we do so, the resolution may be less favorable to us than if we were dealing with a party that was not historically our parent company. Potential indemnification liabilities to InvenTrust pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement could materially adversely affect our operations. The Separation and Distribution Agreement with InvenTrust provides for, among other things, the allocation between us and InvenTrust of InvenTrust’s assets, liabilities and obligations attributable to periods prior to, at and after the separation, and provisions governing our relationships with InvenTrust following the separation and distribution. Among other things, the Separation and Distribution Agreement provides indemnification obligations designed to make us financially responsible for all liabilities that may exist relating to the “Xenia Business”, which consists of the business, operations and activities relating primarily to our portfolio and any other hotels previously owned by Xenia or InvenTrust prior to the separation, other than the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, whether incurred prior to, at or after the separation and distribution. With respect to the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, notwithstanding the foregoing, we have agreed to assume the first $8 million of liabilities (including any related fees and expenses) incurred following the distribution relating to, arising out of or resulting from the ownership, operation or sale of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio and that relate to, arise out of or result from a claim or demand that is made against Xenia or InvenTrust by any person who is not a party or an affiliate of a party to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, other than liabilities arising from the breach or alleged breach by InvenTrust of certain fundamental 19 representations made by InvenTrust to the third party purchasers of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. We have also agreed to assume and indemnify InvenTrust for certain tax liabilities attributable to the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. As part of our working capital at the time of distribution, InvenTrust left us with cash estimated to be sufficient to satisfy such tax obligations. As a result, we may be responsible for substantial liabilities under the Separation and Distribution Agreement. In connection with our separation from InvenTrust, InvenTrust has agreed to indemnify us for certain pre-distribution liabilities and liabilities related to InvenTrust assets. However, there can be no assurance that these indemnities will be sufficient to insure us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that InvenTrust’s ability to satisfy its indemnification obligation will not be impaired in the future. Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement, InvenTrust has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities related to InvenTrust assets. However, third parties could seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that InvenTrust agrees to retain, and there can be no assurance that InvenTrust will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Moreover, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from InvenTrust any amounts for which we are held liable, such indemnification may be insufficient to fully offset the financial impact of such liabilities and/or we may be temporarily required to bear these losses while seeking recovery from InvenTrust. Our agreements with InvenTrust may not reflect terms that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations among unaffiliated third parties. The agreements related to our separation from InvenTrust, including the Separation and Distribution Agreement, Transition Services Agreement and Employee Matters Agreement, were negotiated in the context of our separation from InvenTrust while we were still part of and a wholly-owned subsidiary of InvenTrust and, accordingly, may not reflect terms that would have resulted from arm’s-length negotiations among unaffiliated third parties. The terms of the agreements we negotiated in the context of our separation related to, among other things, allocations of assets, liabilities, rights, indemnifications and other obligations among InvenTrust and us. For example, when the terms of these agreements were negotiated, we did not have a board of directors that was independent from InvenTrust. See “Part III-Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” Risks Related to Debt Financing Volatility in the financial markets and challenging economic conditions could adversely affect our ability to secure debt financing on attractive terms and our ability to service any future indebtedness that we may incur. The domestic and international commercial real estate debt markets could become very volatile as a result of, among other things, the tightening of underwriting standards by lenders and credit rating agencies. This could result in less availability of credit and increasing costs for what is available. If the overall cost of borrowing increases, either by increases in the index rates or by increases in lender spreads, the increased costs may result in existing assets or future acquisitions generating lower overall economic returns and potentially reducing future cash flow available for distribution. If these disruptions in the debt markets were to persist, our ability to borrow monies to finance the purchase of, or other activities related to, real estate assets could be negatively impacted. If we are unable to borrow monies on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, we likely will have to reduce the number of properties we can purchase, and the return on the properties we do purchase may be lower. In addition, we may find it difficult, costly or impossible to refinance indebtedness which is maturing. Further, economic conditions could negatively impact commercial real estate fundamentals and result in declining values in our real estate portfolio and in the collateral securing any loan investments we may make, which could have various negative impacts. Specifically, the value of collateral securing any loan investment we may make could decrease below the outstanding principal amounts of such loans, requiring us to pledge more collateral. Our organizational documents have no limitation on the amount of indebtedness we may incur. As a result, we may become highly leveraged in the future, which could materially and adversely affect us. Our business strategy contemplates the use of both non-recourse secured and unsecured debt to finance long-term growth. In addition, our organizational documents contain no limitations on the amount of debt that we may incur, and our Board of Directors may change our financing policy at any time without stockholder notice or approval. As a result, we may be able to incur substantial additional debt, including secured debt, in the future. Incurring debt could subject us to many risks, including the risks that: • • our cash flows from operations may be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest; our debt and resulting maturities may increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions; 20 • we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, thereby reducing cash available for distribution to our stockholders, funds available for operations and capital expenditures, future business opportunities or other purposes; • the terms of any refinancing may not be in the same amount or on terms as favorable as the terms of the existing debt being refinanced; • we may be obligated to repay the debt pursuant to guarantee obligations; and • the use of leverage could adversely affect our ability to raise capital from other sources or to make distributions to our stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. If we violate covenants in future agreements relating to indebtedness that we may incur, we could be required to repay all or a portion of our indebtedness before maturity at a time when we might be unable to arrange financing for such repayment on attractive terms, if at all. In addition, indebtedness agreements may require that we meet certain covenant tests in order to make distributions to our stockholders. If we are unable to repay or refinance our existing debt, we may be unable to sustain or increase distributions to our stockholders and our share price may be adversely affected. Our existing and future debt may subject us to many risks, including the risks that: • • our cash flow from operations will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest; our debt may increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions; • we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, thereby reducing cash available for distribution to our stockholders, funds available for operations and capital expenditures, future business opportunities or other purposes; • • the terms of any refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of the debt being refinanced; and the terms of our debt may limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and therefore adversely affect the market price of our shares. If we do not have sufficient funds to repay our debt at maturity, it may be necessary to refinance this debt through additional debt financing, or private or public offerings of debt or equity securities. Alternatively, we may need to sell the underlying hotel or, in certain instances, the lender may foreclose. Adverse economic conditions could cause the terms on which we borrow or refinance to be unfavorable. If we are unable to refinance our debt on acceptable terms, we may be forced to dispose of hotels on disadvantageous terms or at times which may not permit us to receive an attractive return on our investments, potentially resulting in losses adversely affecting cash flow from operating activities. Borrowings may reduce the funds available for distribution and increase the risk of loss since defaults may cause us to lose the properties securing the loans. We have acquired properties by borrowing monies and we may, in some instances, acquire properties by assuming existing financing. We may borrow money to finance a portion of the purchase price of assets we acquire. We may also borrow money for other purposes to, among other things, satisfy the requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, subject to certain adjustments, or as is otherwise necessary or advisable to assure that we continue to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Over the long term, however, payments required on any amounts we borrow reduce the funds available for, among other things, acquisitions, capital expenditures for existing properties or distributions to our stockholders because cash otherwise available for these purposes is used to pay principal and interest on this debt. If there is a shortfall between the cash flow from a property and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt on a property, then the amount of cash flow from operations available for distributions to stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In such a case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of our investment. For tax purposes, a foreclosure is treated as a sale of the property or properties for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the property or properties. If the outstanding balance of the debt exceeds our tax basis in the property or properties, we would recognize taxable gain on the foreclosure action even though we would not receive any cash proceeds. We also may fully or partially guarantee any monies that subsidiaries borrow to purchase or operate properties. In 21 these cases, we will likely be responsible to the lender for repaying the loans if the subsidiary is unable to do so. If any mortgage contains cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions, more than one property may be affected by a default. If we are unable to borrow at favorable rates, we may not be able to acquire new properties. If we are unable to borrow money at favorable rates, we may be unable to acquire additional real estate assets or refinance existing loans at maturity. Further, we may enter into loan agreements or other credit arrangements that require us to pay interest on amounts we borrow at variable or “adjustable” rates. Increases in interest rates will increase our interest costs. If interest rates are higher when we refinance our loans, our expenses will increase, thereby reducing our cash flow and the amount available for distribution to you. Further, during periods of rising interest rates, we may be forced to sell one or more of our properties in order to repay existing loans, which may not permit us to maximize the return on the particular properties being sold. Interest-only indebtedness may increase our risk of default and ultimately may reduce our funds available for distribution to our stockholders. We have obtained, and may continue to enter into, mortgage indebtedness that does not require us to pay principal for all or a portion of the life of the debt instrument. During the period when no principal payments are required, the amount of each scheduled payment is less than that of a traditional amortizing mortgage loan. The principal balance of the mortgage loan is not reduced (except in the case of prepayments) because there are no scheduled monthly payments of principal required during this period. After the interest-only period, we may be required either to make scheduled payments of principal and interest or to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at or prior to maturity. These required principal or balloon payments will increase the amount of our scheduled payments and may increase our risk of default under the related mortgage loan if we do not have funds available or are unable to refinance the obligation. Existing and future debt agreements contain or may contain restrictions that limit our flexibility in operating our business. The mortgages on our existing hotels, and hotels that we may acquire in the future, likely will contain customary covenants such as those that limit our ability, without the prior consent of the lender, to further mortgage the applicable hotel or to discontinue insurance coverage. In addition, such loans contain negative covenants that, among other things, preclude certain changes of control, and/or changes in the hotel brand or manager of a collateralized property without lender consent, inhibit our ability to incur additional indebtedness or, under certain circumstances, restrict cash flow necessary to make distributions to our stockholders. These loans also often have debt service coverage ratio requirements that could limit our ability to borrow additional funds. In addition, in connection with our mortgage agreements we may enter into lockbox and cash management agreements pursuant to which under certain situations substantially all of the income generated by our hotel properties will be deposited directly into lockbox accounts and then swept into cash management accounts for the benefit of our lenders and from which cash will be distributed to us only after funding of certain items, which may include payment of principal and interest on our debt, insurance and tax reserves or escrows and other expenses. As a result, we may be forced to borrow additional funds in order to make distributions to our stockholders (including, potentially, to make distributions necessary to allow us to maintain our qualification as a REIT). The credit agreements governing our senior unsecured revolving credit facility and our unsecured term loans contain customary covenants with which we must comply, which limit the discretion of management with respect to certain business matters. These covenants place restrictions on, among other things, our ability to incur additional indebtedness, incur liens on assets, enter into new types of businesses, engage in mergers, liquidations or consolidations, sell assets, make restricted payments (including the payment of dividends and other distributions) after the occurrence and during the continuance of a default or event of default, enter into negative pledges or limitations on the ability of subsidiaries to make certain distributions or to guarantee the indebtedness under the credit agreement, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, enter into speculative hedging transactions, change our fiscal year and make certain payments and prepayments with respect to subordinated debt. The credit agreements also contain financial covenants relating to our maximum total leverage ratio, maximum secured leverage ratio, maximum secured recourse leverage ratio, minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, minimum consolidated tangible net worth, minimum unsecured interest coverage ratio and setting a minimum number of unencumbered properties we must own and a minimum value for such unencumbered properties. Any other credit facility or secured loans that we enter into may place additional restrictions on us and may require us to meet certain financial ratios and tests. Our continued ability to borrow under the revolving credit facility and any other credit facility that we may obtain will be subject to compliance with these covenants and our ability to meet these covenants will be adversely affected if U.S. lodging fundamentals do not continue to improve when and to the extent that we expect. In addition, our failure to comply with these covenants, as well as our inability to make required payments under the credit agreement or any future debt agreement, could cause an event of default 22 under the credit agreement, which, if not waived, could result in the termination of the financing commitments under the credit agreement and the acceleration of the maturity of the outstanding indebtedness thereunder, or could cause an event of default under such future debt agreement, which could result in the acceleration of the debt and require us to repay such debt with capital obtained from other sources, which may not be available to us or may be available only on unattractive terms. Furthermore, if we default on secured debt, lenders can take possession of the hotel or hotels securing such debt. In addition, the credit agreements contain, and any future debt agreements may contain, cross-default provisions with respect to certain other recourse and non-recourse indebtedness and contain certain other events of default which would similarly, in each case, give the lenders under the credit agreements the right to terminate such financing commitments and accelerate the maturity of such indebtedness under the credit agreements or give the lenders under such other agreement the right to declare a default on its debt and to enforce remedies, including acceleration of the maturity of such debt upon the occurrence of a default under such other indebtedness. If we default on our credit agreements or any other debt agreements, it could materially and adversely affect us. We may be unable to satisfy our debt obligations upon a change of control. Under the documents that govern our indebtedness, if we experience a change of control, we could be required to incur certain penalties, fees and other expenses, which may include repayment of the entire principal balance of some of our outstanding indebtedness plus additional fees and interest. We might not have sufficient funds to repay such amounts. Any of these events could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, business, results of operations and financial condition. Covenants applicable to current or future debt could restrict our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and, as a result, we may be unable to make distributions necessary to qualify as a REIT, which could materially and adversely affect us and the market price of our common stock. We intend to continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify as a REIT, we generally are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding net capital gain, each year to our stockholders. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we distribute to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under the Code. If, as a result of covenants applicable to our current or future debt, we are restricted from making distributions to our stockholders, we may be unable to make distributions necessary for us to avoid U.S. federal corporate income and excise taxes and maintain our qualification as a REIT, which could materially and adversely affect us. Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. We have borrowed money, which bears interest at variable rates, and therefore are exposed to increases in costs in a rising interest rate environment. Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense on any variable rate debt, as well as any debt that must be refinanced at higher interest rates at the time of maturity. Our future earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected due to the increased requirement to service our debt and could reduce the amount we are able to distribute to our stockholders. As of December 31, 2016, approximately $505.4 million, or 46.6% of the total debt outstanding bore interest at variable rates which was not hedged by interest rate protection agreements. We may be contractually obligated to purchase property even if we are unable to secure financing for the acquisition. We may finance all or a portion of the purchase price for properties that we acquire. However, to ensure that our offers are as competitive as possible, we do not expect to enter into contracts to purchase property that include financing contingencies. Thus, we may be contractually obligated to purchase a property even if we are unable to secure financing for the acquisition. In this event, we may choose to close on the property by using cash on hand, which would result in less cash available for our operations and distributions to stockholders. Alternatively, we may choose not to close on the acquisition of the property and default on the purchase contract. If we default on any purchase contract, we could lose our earnest money and become subject to liquidated or other contractual damages and remedies. To hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we may use derivative financial instruments that may be costly and ineffective. To the extent consistent with maintaining our qualification as a REIT, from time to time, we may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our assets. Derivative instruments may include interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, options or repurchase agreements. Our actual hedging decisions will be determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the hedge and 23 may differ from our currently anticipated hedging strategy. There is no assurance that our hedging strategy will achieve our objectives. We may be subject to costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs, if we terminate these arrangements. To the extent that we use derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate fluctuations, we will be exposed to credit risk, basis risk and legal enforceability risks. In this context, credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. If the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. If the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, we owe the counterparty, which creates a risk that we may not be able to pay such amounts. Basis risk occurs when the index upon which the contract is based is more or less variable than the index upon which the hedged asset or liability is based, thereby making the hedge less effective. Finally, legal enforceability risks encompass general contractual risks including the risk that the counterparty will breach the terms of, or fail to perform its obligations under, the derivative contract, increasing the risk that we may not realize the benefits of these instruments. There is a risk that counterparties could fail, shut down, file for bankruptcy or be unable to pay out contracts. The failure of a counterparty that holds collateral that we post in connection with an interest rate swap agreement could result in the loss of that collateral. There can be no assurance that the direct or indirect effects of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act will not have an adverse effect on our interest rate hedging activities. Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act contains a sweeping overhaul of the regulation of privately negotiated derivatives. The provisions of Title VII became effective on July 16, 2011 or, with respect to particular provisions, on such other date specified in the Dodd-Frank Act or by subsequent rulemaking. Pursuant to the regulatory framework established by Title VII of the Dodd- Frank Act, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or the CFTC, has been granted broad regulatory authority over “swaps,” which term has been defined in the Dodd-Frank Act and related CFTC rules to include interest rate derivatives such as the ones we may use in our interest rate hedging activities. While the full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our interest rate hedging activities cannot be fully assessed until all final implementing rules and regulations are promulgated, the requirements of Title VII may affect our ability to enter into hedging or other risk management transactions, may increase our costs in entering into such transactions, and/or may result in us entering into such transactions on less favorable terms than prior to effectiveness of the Dodd-Frank Act. For example, subject to an exception for end-users of swaps upon which we may seek to rely, we may be required to clear certain interest rate hedging transactions by submitting them to a derivatives clearing organization. In addition, to the extent we are required to clear any such transactions, we will be required to, among other things, post margin in connection with such transactions. The occurrence of any of the foregoing events may have an adverse effect on our business and our stockholders’ return. Risks Related to Our Status as REIT Failure to qualify as a REIT, or failure to remain qualified as a REIT, would cause us to be taxed as a regular corporation, which would substantially reduce funds available for distributions to our stockholders. We elected to be taxed as a REIT beginning with our short taxable year that commenced on January 5, 2015 and ended on February 3, 2015. We believe that we have been organized and we have operated in a manner that allowed us to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with such short taxable year, and we intend to continue operating in such a manner. However, we cannot assure you that we will remain qualified as a REIT or that we will not be required to rely on a REIT “savings” clause. If we were to rely on a REIT “savings” clause, we would have to pay a penalty tax, which could be material. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available for distributions to our stockholders because: • we would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to stockholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates; • we could be subject to the U.S. federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes; and • unless we are entitled to relief under certain U.S. federal income tax laws, we could not re-elect REIT status for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify as a REIT. In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will no longer be required to make distributions. As a result of all these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital, and it would adversely affect the value of our common stock. 24 If InvenTrust failed to qualify as a REIT in its 2011 through 2015 taxable years, we would be prevented from electing to qualify as a REIT. We believe that from the time of our formation until January 5, 2015, we were treated as a “qualified REIT subsidiary” of InvenTrust. Under applicable Treasury regulations, if InvenTrust failed to qualify as a REIT in any of its 2011 through 2015 taxable years, unless InvenTrust’s failure was subject to relief under U.S. federal income tax laws, we would be prevented from electing to qualify as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which InvenTrust failed to qualify. We have made a joint election with InvenTrust that, among other things, caused us to have a short taxable year that ended on February 3, 2015 and if we failed to qualify as a REIT for that short taxable year, we would be liable for a material corporate income tax and would be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the following four taxable years. We have made a joint election with InvenTrust under section 336(e) of the Code with respect to our spin-off from InvenTrust on February 3, 2015, which allowed us to significantly increase our tax basis in our assets. As a result of that election, among other things, we were deemed to sell all of our assets to a third party and liquidate on February 3, 2015, the date of the spin-off. The gain we recognized in that deemed sale that was attributable to the personal property at our hotels was not qualifying income for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests applicable to REITs. Based on our valuation of our personal property, we believe that we satisfied the 75% and 95% gross income tests for our short taxable year that ended on February 3, 2015. No complete assurance can be provided that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) would not disagree with our valuation of our personal property and our determination of the gain from the deemed sale of that property. If the IRS successfully asserted that we failed to satisfy one or more of the requirements for REIT qualification for our short taxable year ended on February 3, 2015, we would be able to maintain our REIT status only if we were able to qualify for a REIT “savings clause.” We have been advised by counsel that, even if we failed the gross income tests as a result of the IRS successfully disagreeing with the valuation of our personal property, we will be able to qualify for a REIT “savings clause.” To qualify for the REIT “savings clause,” we would have to pay a penalty tax, which could be material. Moreover, an opinion of legal counsel reflects only the counsel’s best judgment on a legal issue and is not binding on a court. Accordingly, no assurance can be provided that we would qualify for the REIT “savings clause” to maintain our qualification. If the IRS successfully disagreed with our valuation of our personal property and we did not qualify for the REIT “savings clause,” we would be subject to corporate income tax on the deemed sale of our assets pursuant to the section 336(e) election, and that corporate income tax would be material. In addition, we would be precluded from electing REIT status for the four taxable years following that failure. Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flows. Even if we continue to qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, franchise, property and transfer taxes. In addition, our TRS, and any other TRS we form, will be subject to regular corporate U.S federal, state and local taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distributions to stockholders. Failure to make required distributions would subject us to U.S. federal corporate income tax. We intend to continue to operate in a manner so as to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In order to continue to qualify as a REIT, we generally are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gain, each year to our stockholders. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we pay out to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under the Code. REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our liquidity and may force us to borrow funds or sell assets during unfavorable market conditions. To satisfy the REIT distribution requirements, we may need to borrow funds on a short-term basis or sell assets, even if the then- prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings or sales. Our cash flows from operations may be insufficient to fund required distributions as a result of differences in timing between the actual receipt of income and the recognition of income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or the effect of non-deductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt service or amortization payments. The insufficiency of our cash flows to cover our distribution requirements could have an adverse impact on our ability to raise short- and long-term debt or sell equity securities in order to fund distributions required to maintain our qualification as a REIT. 25 The ownership of our TRS and our TRS lessees increases our overall tax liability. Our TRS, and any other domestic TRS we form, will be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax on their taxable income, which will consist of the revenues from the hotels leased by our TRS lessees, net of the operating expenses for such hotels and rent payments to us. Accordingly, although our ownership of our TRS lessees will allow us to participate in the operating income from our hotels in addition to receiving rent, that operating income will be fully subject to income tax. The after-tax net income of our TRS lessees is available for distribution to us. Our TRS lessee structure subjects us to the risk of increased hotel operating expenses that could adversely affect our operating results and our ability to make distributions to stockholders. Our leases with our TRS lessees require our TRS lessees to pay us rent based in part on revenues from our hotels. Our operating risks include decreases in hotel revenues and increases in hotel operating expenses, including but not limited to the increases in wage and benefit costs, repair and maintenance expenses, energy costs, property taxes, insurance costs and other operating expenses, which would adversely affect our TRS lessees’ ability to pay us rent due under the leases. Increases in these operating expenses can have a significant adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, the market price of our common shares and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. Our ownership of our TRS, and any other TRSs we form, will be subject to limitations and our transactions with our TRS, and any other TRSs we form, will cause us to be subject to a 100% penalty tax on certain income or deductions if those transactions are not conducted on arm’s-length terms. Overall, no more than 25% (or 20% for the taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017) of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. In addition, the Code limits the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. The Code also imposes a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis. The 100% tax would apply, for example, to the extent that we were found to have charged our TRS lessees rent in excess of an arm’s-length rent. We will monitor the value of our investment in our TRS for the purpose of ensuring compliance with TRS ownership limitations and will structure our transactions with our TRS on terms that we believe are arm’s length to avoid incurring the 100% excise tax described above. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to comply with the 25% (or 20%) TRS limitation or to avoid application of the 100% excise tax. If the leases of our hotels to our TRS lessees are not respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will fail to qualify as a REIT. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must annually satisfy two gross income tests, under which specified percentages of our gross income must be derived from certain sources, such as “rents from real property.” Rents paid to our Operating Partnership by our TRS lessees pursuant to the leases of our hotels will constitute substantially all of our gross income. In order for such rent to qualify as “rents from real property” for purposes of the gross income tests, the leases must be respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes and not be treated as service contracts, financing arrangements, joint ventures or some other type of arrangement. If our leases are not respected as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will fail to qualify as a REIT. If any of our current and future hotel management companies do not qualify as “eligible independent contractors,” or if our hotels are not “qualified lodging facilities,” we will fail to qualify as a REIT. Rent paid by a lessee that is a “related party tenant” of ours will not be qualifying income for purposes of the two gross income tests applicable to REITs. An exception is provided, however, for leases of “qualified lodging facilities” (as defined below) to a TRS so long as the hotels are managed by an “eligible independent contractor” and certain other requirements are satisfied. We expect to lease all or substantially all of our hotels to our TRS lessees and to engage hotel management companies that qualify as “eligible independent contractors.” Among other requirements, in order to qualify as an eligible independent contractor, the hotel manager must not own, directly or through its stockholders, more than 35% of our outstanding shares, and no person or group of persons can own more than 35% of our outstanding shares and the shares (or ownership interest) of the hotel manager, taking into account certain ownership attribution rules. The ownership attribution rules that apply for purposes of these 35% thresholds are complex, and monitoring actual and constructive ownership of our shares by our hotel managers and their owners may not be practical. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that these ownership levels will not be exceeded. In addition, for a hotel management company to qualify as an eligible independent contractor, such company or a related person must be actively engaged in the trade or business of operating “qualified lodging facilities” (as defined below) for one or more 26 persons not related to the REIT or its TRSs at each time that such company enters into a hotel management contract with a TRS or its TRS lessee. We believe our current hotel managers operate qualified lodging facilities for certain persons who are not related to us or our TRS. However, no assurance can be provided that any of our current and future hotel managers will in fact comply with this requirement. Failure to comply with this requirement would require us to find other managers for future contracts, and, if we hired a management company without knowledge of the failure, it could jeopardize our status as a REIT. Finally, each property with respect to which our TRS lessees pay rent must be a “qualified lodging facility.” A “qualified lodging facility” is a hotel, motel or other establishment more than one-half of the dwelling units in which are used on a transient basis, including customary amenities and facilities, provided that no wagering activities are conducted at or in connection with such facility by any person who is engaged in the business of accepting wagers and who is legally authorized to engage in such business at or in connection with such facility. We believe that the hotels that are leased to our TRS lessees are qualified lodging facilities. Although we intend to monitor future acquisitions and improvements of properties, REIT provisions of the Code provide only limited guidance for making determinations under the requirements for qualified lodging facilities, and there can be no assurance that these requirements will be satisfied. Complying with REIT requirements may force us to forgo and/or liquidate otherwise attractive investment opportunities. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must ensure that we meet the REIT gross income tests annually and that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real estate assets. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, no more than 25% of the value of our assets can consist of debt of publicly offered REITs (i.e., REITs that are required to file annual and period reports with the SEC under the Exchange Act) that is not secured by real property, and no more than 25% (or 20% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017) of the value of our total assets can be represented by securities of one or more TRSs. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate from our portfolio, or contribute to a TRS, otherwise attractive investments in order to maintain our qualification as a REIT. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders. In addition, we may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution, and may be unable to pursue investments that would otherwise be advantageous to us in order to satisfy the source of income or asset diversification requirements for qualifying as a REIT. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to make, and, in certain cases, maintain ownership of, certain attractive investments. You may be restricted from acquiring or transferring certain amounts of our common stock. The stock ownership restrictions of the Code for REITs and the 9.8% stock ownership limit in our charter may inhibit market activity in our capital stock and restrict our business combination opportunities. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT for each taxable year after our first taxable year as a REIT, five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code, may not own, beneficially or constructively, more than 50% in value of our issued and outstanding capital stock at any time during the last half of a taxable year. Attribution rules in the Code determine if any individual or entity beneficially or constructively owns our capital stock under this requirement. Additionally, at least 100 persons must beneficially own our capital stock during at least 335 days of a taxable year for each taxable year after our first taxable year as a REIT. To help insure that we meet these tests, our charter restricts the acquisition and ownership of shares of our capital stock. Our charter authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted by our Board of Directors (prospectively or retroactively), our charter prohibits any person from beneficially or constructively owning more than 9.8% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock. Our Board of Directors may not grant an exemption from these restrictions to any proposed transferee whose ownership in excess of 9.8% of the value of our outstanding shares would result in our failing to qualify as a REIT. These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply, however, if our Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance is no longer required in order for us to qualify as a REIT. 27 We may pay taxable dividends in cash and our common stock, in which case stockholders may sell shares of our common stock to pay tax on such dividends, placing downward pressure on the market price of our common stock. We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in cash and common stock at the election of each stockholder. If we made a taxable dividend payable in cash and common stock, taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend as ordinary income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, stockholders may be required to pay income tax with respect to such dividends in excess of the cash dividends received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the common stock that it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our common stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to certain non-U.S. stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. federal income tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in common stock. If we made a taxable dividend payable in cash and our common stock and a significant number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our common stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock. We do not currently intend to pay a taxable dividend in our common stock and cash. Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for the reduced tax rates available for some dividends. The maximum tax rate applicable to “qualified dividend income” payable to U.S. stockholders that are taxed at individual rates is 20%. Dividends payable by REITs, however, are generally not eligible for the reduced rates on qualified dividend income. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are taxed at individual rates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stock of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends treated as qualified dividend income, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our common stock. Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively. The REIT provisions of the Code may limit our ability to hedge the risks inherent to our operations. Under current law, any income that we generate from derivatives or other transactions intended to hedge our interest rate risk with respect to borrowings made, or to be made, to acquire or carry real estate assets generally will not constitute gross income for purposes of the 75% and 95% income tests applicable to REITs. In addition, any income from certain other qualified hedging transactions would generally not constitute gross income for purposes of both the 75% and 95% income tests. However, we may be required to limit the use of hedging techniques that might otherwise be advantageous, which could result in greater risks associated with interest rate or other changes than we would otherwise incur. The ability of our Board of Directors to revoke our REIT qualification without stockholder approval may cause adverse consequences to our stockholders. Our charter provides that our Board of Directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT. If we cease to be a REIT, we would become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income and would no longer be required to distribute most of our taxable income to our stockholders, which may have adverse consequences on our total return to our stockholders. We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could reduce the market price of our common stock. At any time, the U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended. We cannot predict when or if any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation, or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or become effective and any such law, regulation, or interpretation may take effect retroactively. In addition, according to publicly released statements, a top legislative priority of the current administration and Congress may be significant reform of the Code, including significant changes to taxation of business entities. There is substantial lack of clarity around both the timing and the details of any such tax reform and the impact of any potential tax reform on an investment in us. We and our stockholders could be adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation. 28 Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock and our Corporate Structure The market price of our shares may fluctuate widely and there can be no assurance that the market for our stock will provide you with adequate liquidity. Prior to our separation from InvenTrust there was no public market for our common stock, and we cannot predict the prices at which our common stock may trade in the future. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate widely, depending on many factors, some of which may be beyond our control, including: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • actual or anticipated differences in our operating results, liquidity, or financial condition; changes in our revenues, Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”), Adjusted EBITDA (“Adjusted EBITDA”), Funds From Operations (“FFO”), Adjusted FFO (“Adjusted FFO”), or earnings estimates; publication of research reports about us, our hotels or the lodging or overall real estate industry; failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates; the extent of institutional investor interest in us; the reputation of REITs and real estate investments generally and the attractiveness of REIT equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate companies, and fixed income securities; additions and departures of key personnel; the performance and market valuations of other similar companies; strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings; fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors; the passage of legislation or other regulatory developments that adversely affect us or our industry; the realization of any of the other risk factors presented in this Annual Report; speculation in the press or investment community; changes in accounting principles; events beyond our control, such as terrorist acts, wars, travel-related health concerns and natural disasters; and general market and economic conditions, including factors unrelated to our operating performance. Stock markets in general have experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of a particular company. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. Significant sales of our common stock, or the perception that significant sales of such shares could occur, may cause the price of our common stock to decline significantly. A large volume of sales of shares of our common stock could decrease the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities in the future. Even if a substantial number of sales of our shares are not affected, the mere perception of the possibility of these sales could depress the market price of our common stock and have a negative effect on our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, anticipated downward pressure on our common stock price due to actual or anticipated sales of common stock from this market overhang could cause some institutions or individuals to engage in short sales of our common stock, which may itself cause the price of our common stock to decline. Future sales or distributions of our common stock may negatively affect the market price of our common stock. It is possible that some of our large stockholders will sell our common stock. Any disposition by significant stockholders of our common stock in the public market or the perception that such dispositions could occur could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock. 29 Our cash available for distribution to stockholders may not be sufficient to pay distributions at expected or required levels, and we may need external sources in order to make such distributions, or we may not be able to make such distributions at all, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline significantly. We intend to pay regular quarterly distributions to holders of our common stock. We have established our distribution rate based upon our estimate of our annualized cash flow that will be available for distributions. All distributions will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our historical and projected results of operations, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO, Adjusted FFO, liquidity and financial condition, REIT qualification, debt service requirements, capital expenditures and operating expenses, prohibitions and other restrictions under financing arrangements and applicable law and other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time. No assurance can be given that our projections will prove accurate or that any level of distributions will be made or sustained or achieve a market yield. We may not be able to make distributions in the future or may need to consider various funding sources to cover any shortfall, including borrowing under our $400 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility, selling certain of our assets or using a portion of the net proceeds we receive from future offerings of equity, equity-related or debt securities or declaring taxable share dividends. Any of the foregoing could cause the market price of our common stock to decline significantly. Future issuances of debt securities, which would rank senior to our common stock upon our liquidation, and future issuances of equity securities (including Operating Partnership Units), which would dilute the holdings of our existing common stockholders and may be senior to our common stock for the purposes of making distributions, periodically or upon liquidation, may negatively affect the market price of our common stock. In the future, we may issue debt or equity securities or incur other borrowings. Upon our liquidation, holders of our debt securities and other loans and preferred shares will receive a distribution of our available assets before common stockholders. If we incur debt in the future, our future interest costs could increase, and adversely affect our liquidity, FFO, Adjusted FFO and results of operations. We are not required to offer any additional equity securities to existing common stockholders on a preemptive basis. Therefore, additional common stock issuances, directly or through convertible or exchangeable securities (including Operating Partnership Units), warrants or options, will dilute the holdings of our existing common stockholders and such issuances or the perception of such issuances may reduce the market price of our common stock. Because our decision to issue debt or equity securities or incur other borrowings in the future will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, nature or success of our future capital raising efforts. Thus, common stockholders bear the risk that our future issuances of debt or equity securities or our incurrence of other borrowings will negatively affect the market price of our common stock. Your percentage ownership in us may be diluted in the future. As with any publicly traded company, your percentage ownership in us may be diluted in the future because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market transactions or otherwise, including, without limitation, equity awards that may be granted to our directors, officers, employees and consultants. Our Board of Directors has approved an Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”), which provides for the grant of cash and equity-based awards to our directors, officers, employees, and consultants. We reserved 7,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance or transfer pursuant to awards under the Plan. For a more detailed description of the Plan, see “Part III-Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.” If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they downgrade our stock or our sector, our stock price and trading volume could decline. The trading market for our common stock will rely in part on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. We do not control these analysts. Furthermore, if one or more of the analysts who do cover us downgrade our stock or our industry, or the stock of any of our competitors, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price of our common stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose viability in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline. Increases in market interest rates may reduce demand for our common stock and result in a decline in the market price of our common stock. The market price of our common stock may be influenced by the dividend yield on our common stock (i.e., the amount of our annual distributions as a percentage of the market price of our common stock) relative to market interest rates. An increase in market interest rates, which are currently low compared to historical levels, may lead prospective purchasers of our common 30 stock to expect a higher distribution yield, which we may not be able, or may choose not, to provide. Higher interest rates would also likely increase our borrowing costs and decrease our operating results and cash available for distribution. Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited, which could limit our stockholders’ recourse in the event of actions not in our stockholders’ best interests. Under Maryland law generally, a director is required to perform his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. Under Maryland law, directors are presumed to have acted in accordance with this standard of conduct. In addition, our charter eliminates the liability of our directors and officers to us and our stockholders for monetary damages, except for liability resulting from: • • actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or services; or active and deliberate dishonesty by the director or officer that was established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action adjudicated. Our charter authorizes us to obligate ourselves and our bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law in effect from time to time, to indemnify and to pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding to any present or former director or officer who is made or threatened to be made a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service to us in that capacity. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist absent the current provisions in our charter and bylaws. Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes in control. Certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, or “MGCL”, may have the effect of deterring a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change in our control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our common stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of our common stock, including: • • “business combination” provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested stockholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate or associate of ours who was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding voting stock at any time within the two-year period immediately prior to the date in question) for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, and thereafter impose fair price and/or super majority stockholder voting requirements on these combinations; and “control share” provisions that provide that “control shares” of our company (defined as voting shares that, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the stockholder, entitle the stockholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of issued and outstanding control shares) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by our stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares. As permitted by Maryland law, we have elected, by resolution of our Board of Directors, to opt out of the business combination provisions of the MGCL, provided that such business combination has been approved by our Board of Directors (including a majority of directors who are not affiliated with the interested stockholder), and, pursuant to a provision in our bylaws, to exempt any acquisition of our stock from the control share provisions of the MGCL. However, our Board of Directors may by resolution elect to repeal the exemption from the business combination provisions of the MGCL and may by amendment to our bylaws opt into the control share provisions of the MGCL at any time in the future. Certain provisions of the MGCL permit our Board of Directors, without stockholder approval and regardless of what is currently provided in our charter or bylaws, to adopt certain mechanisms, some of which (for example, a classified board) we do not currently have. These provisions may have the effect of limiting or precluding a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in our control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our common stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then current market price. Our charter contains a provision whereby we elect to be subject to the provisions of Title 3, Subtitle 8 of the MGCL relating to the filling of vacancies on our Board of Directors. 31 As a holding company with no direct operations, we rely on funds received from our Operating Partnership to pay liabilities. As a holding company that conducts substantially all of our operations through our Operating Partnership, we rely on distributions from our Operating Partnership to pay any dividends we might declare on shares of our common stock. We also rely on distributions from our Operating Partnership to meet any of our obligations, including any tax liability on taxable income allocated to us from our Operating Partnership. In addition, because we are a holding company, your claims as stockholders will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities and obligations (whether or not for borrowed money) of our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, our assets and those of our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries will be able to satisfy the claims of our stockholders only after all of our and our Operating Partnership’s and its subsidiaries’ liabilities and obligations have been paid in full. We own 98.7% of the Operating Partnership Units and the remaining 1.3% of the Operating Partnership Units are owned by the other limited partners comprised of our current and former executive officers and members of our Board of Directors. However, in connection with our future acquisition of properties or otherwise, we may issue Operating Partnership Units to third parties. Such issuances would reduce our ownership in our operating partnership. Because you will not directly own units of our Operating Partnership, you will not have any voting rights with respect to any such issuances or other partnership level activities of our Operating Partnership. Our charter places limits on the amount of common stock that any person may own. No more than 50% of the outstanding shares of our common stock may be beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of each taxable year (other than our first taxable year for which an election to be a REIT was made). Unless exempted by our Board of Directors, prospectively or retroactively, our charter prohibits any person or group from owning more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock. These provisions may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock. If anyone transfers shares in a way that would violate the ownership limit, or prevent us from maintaining our qualification as a REIT under the U.S. federal income tax laws, those shares instead will be transferred to a trust for the benefit of a charitable beneficiary and will be either redeemed by us or sold to a person whose ownership of the shares will not violate the ownership limit. If this transfer to a trust fails to prevent such a violation or our continued qualification as a REIT, then the initial intended transfer shall be null and void from the outset. The intended transferee of those shares will be deemed never to have owned the shares. Anyone who acquires shares in violation of the ownership limit or the other restrictions on transfer in our charter bears the risk of suffering a financial loss when the shares are redeemed or sold if the market price of our shares falls between the date of purchase and the date of redemption or sale. Our charter permits our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock on terms that may subordinate the rights of the holders of our current common stock or discourage a third party from acquiring us. Our Board of Directors is permitted, subject to certain restrictions set forth in our charter, to authorize the issuance of up to 500,000,000 shares of common stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval. Further, our board may classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common or preferred stock into other classes or series of stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications, and terms or conditions of redemption of the stock and may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares or the number of shares of any class or series that we have authority to issue without stockholder approval. Thus, our Board of Directors could authorize us to issue shares of preferred stock with terms and conditions that could subordinate the rights of the holders of our common stock or shares of preferred stock or common stock that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock. Our conflict of interest policy may not be successful in eliminating the influence of future conflicts of interest that may arise between us and our directors, officers and employees. Our conflict of interest policy provides that any transaction, agreement or relationship in which any of our directors, officers or employees has a material direct or indirect pecuniary interest must be approved by a majority of our disinterested directors. Other than this, however, we may not adopt additional formal procedures for the review and approval of conflict of interest transactions generally. As such, our policies and procedures may not be successful in eliminating the influence of conflicts of interest. 32 Conflicts of interest could arise in the future between the interests of our stockholders and the interests of any holders of Operating Partnership Units in our Operating Partnership, which may impede business decisions that could benefit our stockholders. Conflicts of interest could arise as a result of the relationships between us and our affiliates, on the one hand, and our Operating Partnership or any partner thereof, on the other. Our directors and officers who own interest in our Operating Partnership have duties to us under applicable Maryland law in connection with their management of our company. At the same time, XHR GP, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary, as general partner of our Operating Partnership, has fiduciary duties and obligations to our Operating Partnership and its limited partners under Delaware law and the partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership in connection with the management of our Operating Partnership. Our duties as general partner to our Operating Partnership and its partners may come into conflict with the duties of our directors and officers to our company. These conflicts may be resolved in a manner that is not in the best interests of our stockholders. Certain provisions in the partnership agreement for our Operating Partnership may delay or prevent unsolicited acquisitions of us. Provisions in the partnership agreement for our Operating Partnership may delay or make more difficult unsolicited acquisitions of us or changes in our control. These provisions could discourage third parties from making proposals involving an unsolicited acquisition of us or a change in our control, although some stockholders might consider such proposals, if made, desirable. Our Board of Directors may change our investment policies without stockholder approval, which could alter the nature of your investment. Our investment policies may change over time. The methods of implementing our investment policies may also vary, as new investment techniques are developed. Our investment policies, the methods for implementing them, and our other objectives, policies and procedures may be altered by a majority of the directors without the approval of our stockholders. As a result, the nature of your investment could change without your consent. A change in our investment strategy may, among other things, increase our exposure to interest rate risk, default risk and commercial real property market fluctuations, all of which could materially and adversely affect our ability to achieve our investment objectives. Our Board of Directors may approve very broad investment guidelines and has approved financing guidelines for us and may not always review or approve each investment or financing decision made by our senior management team. Our Board of Directors may authorize our senior management team to follow broad investment guidelines and has approved financing guidelines, in which case, we expect that our senior management team will have latitude in determining the assets that are proper investments for us, as well as the individual investment decisions, and how we finance such investments. Our senior management team may make investments with lower rates of return than those anticipated under current market conditions and/or may make investments with greater risks to achieve those anticipated returns. We expect that our Board of Directors may not always approve each proposed investment or financing strategy by our senior management team. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 2. Properties We lease our headquarters located at 200 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 2700, Orlando, Florida 32801. Hotel Properties As of December 31, 2016, we owned a portfolio of 42 operating hotels, 40 of which are wholly owned, comprising 10,911 rooms, including a 75% ownership interest in two hotels owned through two consolidated real estate entities across 20 states and the District of Columbia. We believe our portfolio of hotels is geographically diverse as our management team has implemented and executed a strategy of acquiring hotels primarily in the Top 25 Markets and key leisure destinations in the U.S. 33 Our Brand Affiliations Our portfolio of hotels primarily operates under premium brands, with approximately 84% of our rooms operating under Marriott, Kimpton, Hyatt or Hilton brands. The following table sets forth our brand affiliations as of December 31, 2016: Number of Hotels Number of Rooms Percentage of Total Rooms Marriott Autograph Collection Courtyard by Marriott Marriott Renaissance Residence Inn Westin Subtotal Kimpton Hyatt Andaz Hyatt Centric Hyatt Regency Subtotal Aston Fairmont Hilton Hampton Inn Hilton Garden Inn Subtotal Loews Total branded Independent Total portfolio 5 4 8 2 3 2 24 7 3 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 2 1 41 1 42 587 630 2,815 1,014 637 893 6,576 5.4% 5.8% 25.8% 9.3% 5.8% 8.2% 60.3% 1,123 10.3% 451 120 505 1,076 645 545 116 300 416 285 10,666 4.1% 1.1% 4.7% 9.9% 5.9% 5.0% 1.1% 2.7% 3.8% 2.6% 97.8% 245 2.2% 10,911 100.0% 34 Our Hotels The following table provides a list of our portfolio as of December 31, 2016(1): Hotel Andaz Napa(4) Andaz San Diego Andaz Savannah(4) Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel(5) Bohemian Hotel Celebration, an Autograph Collection Hotel Bohemian Hotel Savannah Riverfront, an Autograph Collection Hotel(4) Canary Santa Barbara Courtyard Birmingham Downtown at UAB Courtyard Fort Worth Downtown / Blackstone Courtyard Kansas City Country Club Plaza Courtyard Pittsburgh Downtown Fairmont Dallas(4) Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston, an Autograph Collection Hotel(4)(6) Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, an Autograph Collection Hotel(4)(6) Grand Bohemian Hotel Orlando, an Autograph Collection Hotel(4) Hampton Inn & Suites Baltimore Inner Harbor Hilton Garden Inn Washington DC Downtown Hotel Commonwealth(5) Hotel Monaco Chicago(4) Hotel Monaco Denver(4) Hotel Monaco Salt Lake City Hotel Palomar Philadelphia(4) Hyatt Centric Key West Resort & Spa(7) Hyatt Regency Santa Clara(4)(5) Loews New Orleans Hotel(4) Lorien Hotel & Spa Marriott Charleston Town Center(4)(5) Marriott Chicago at Medical District / UIC Marriott Dallas City Center(4) Marriott Griffin Gate Resort & Spa Marriott Napa Valley Hotel & Spa Marriott San Francisco Airport Waterfront Marriott West Des Moines Marriott Woodlands Waterway Hotel & Convention Center(5) Renaissance Atlanta Waverly Hotel & Convention Center Renaissance Austin Hotel Residence Inn Baltimore Inner Harbor Residence Inn Boston Cambridge(4) Residence Inn Denver City Center(4) RiverPlace Hotel Westin Galleria Houston(4) Westin Oaks Houston at the Galleria(4) Year Rooms Acquired State Brand Parent Company Hotel Management Company(2) Chain Scale Segment(3) 141 159 151 645 115 75 97 122 203 123 182 545 50 100 247 116 300 245 191 189 225 230 120 505 285 107 352 113 416 409 275 688 219 343 522 492 188 221 228 84 487 406 2013 2013 2013 2014 2013 2012 2015 2008 2008 2007 2010 2011 N/A N/A 2012 2007 2008 2016 2013 2013 2013 2015 2013 2013 2013 2013 2011 2008 2010 2012 2011 2012 2010 2007 2012 2012 2008 2008 2013 2015 2013 2013 CA CA GA HI FL GA CA AL TX MO PA TX SC AL FL MD DC MA IL CO UT PA FL CA LA VA WV IL TX KY CA CA IA TX GA TX MD MA CO OR TX TX Hyatt Hyatt Hyatt Aston Marriott Marriott Kimpton Marriott Marriott Marriott Marriott Fairmont Marriott Marriott Marriott Hilton Hilton Independent Kimpton Kimpton Kimpton Kimpton Hyatt Hyatt Loews Kimpton Marriott Marriott Marriott Marriott Marriott Marriott Marriott Marriott Marriott Marriott Marriott Marriott Marriott Kimpton Marriott Marriott Hyatt Hyatt Hyatt Aston Kessler Kessler Kimpton Courtyard Courtyard Sage Sage Fairmont Kessler Kessler Kessler Urgo Urgo Sage Kimpton Kimpton Kimpton Kimpton Hyatt Hyatt Loews Kimpton Marriott Davidson Marriott Marriott Sage Marriott Concord Marriott Renaissance Renaissance Urgo Residence Inn Sage Kimpton Westin Westin L L L U UU UU UU U U U U L UU UU UU UM U I UU UU UU UU UU UU L UU UU UU UU UU UU UU UU UU UU UU U U U UU UU UU (1) (2) Includes only the hotels in our portfolio as of December 31, 2016. See “Basis of Presentation.” “Aston” refers to an affiliate of Aqua-Aston Hospitality; “Courtyard” refers to Courtyard Management Corporation; “Concord” refers to Concord Hospitality Enterprises Company; “Davidson” refers to Davidson Hotel Company LLC; “Fairmont” refers to Fairmont Hotels & Resorts (U.S.) Inc.; “Hyatt” refers to Hyatt Corporation; “Kessler” refers to Kessler Collection Management, LLC; “Kimpton” refers to Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, LLC; “Loews” refers 35 to Loews New Orleans Hotel Corp.; “Marriott” refers to Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.; “Renaissance” refers to Renaissance Hotel Operating Company; “Residence Inn” refers to Residence Inn by Marriott, Inc.; “Sage” refers to affiliates of Sage Hospitality Resources, LLC, “Urgo” refers to Urgo Hotels LP; and “Westin” refers to Westin Operator, LLC. (3) “L” refers to Luxury; “UU” refers to Upper Upscale; “U” refers to Upscale; “UM” refers to Upper Midscale; “I” refers to Independent. (4) This property is subject to mortgage debt at December 31, 2016. (5) This hotel is subject to a ground lease that covers all or part of the land underlying the hotel. See “Part I-Item 2. Properties - Our Principal Agreements- Ground Leases” for more information. (6) The Company owns a 75% interest in the hotel, which is consolidated as a variable interest entity in our financial statements. (7) Previously known as the Hyatt Key West Resort and Spa. In November 2016, the hotel was rebranded the Hyatt Centric Key West Resort & Spa. Our Principal Agreements Hotel Management and Franchise Agreements In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we cannot directly or indirectly operate any of our hotels. We lease each of our 42 hotels to TRS lessees, which in turn engage property managers to manage our hotels. Each of our hotels is operated pursuant to a hotel management agreement with an independent hotel management company. Approximately 33% of our hotels (based on the number owned as of December 31, 2016), which we refer to as “franchised hotels” are also operated under distinct franchise agreements, a few of which are with an affiliate of the hotel’s management company. Approximately 65% of our hotels (based on the number owned as of December 31, 2016) receive the benefit pursuant to the hotel’s management agreement, which we refer to as “brand-managed hotels.” Below is a general overview of the management and franchise agreements for our hotels, summarizing the principal terms found in each type of agreement. Management Agreements for Brand-Managed Hotels Pursuant to our management agreements for brand-managed hotels, the management company controls the day-to-day operations of each hotel, and we are granted limited approval rights with respect to certain of the management company’s actions, including entering into long-term or high value contracts, engaging in certain actions relating to legal proceedings, approving the operating budget, making certain capital expenditures and approving the hiring of certain management personnel. We are provided with a variety of services and benefits, including the right to use the name, marks and system of operation of a brand affiliated with the management company, as well as centralized reservation systems, national advertising, marketing programs and publicity designed to increase brand awareness, training of personnel and payroll and accounting services. Of our brand-managed hotels, approximately 53% of our hotels by room count are managed by Marriott, approximately 13% are managed by Kimpton, approximately 13% are managed by Hyatt, and the rest are managed by management companies affiliated with a variety of other brands. Term The majority of our management agreements for brand-managed hotels contain an initial term of between 20 to 30 years, and have an average remaining initial term of approximately 12 years, assuming no renewal options are exercised by the management company. These agreements generally allow for one or more renewal periods at the option of the management company. Including the exercise of all renewal options the average remaining term of our management agreements is approximately 26 years. Fees Our management agreements for brand-managed hotels typically contain a two-tiered fee structure, wherein the management company receives a base management fee and, if certain financial thresholds are met or exceeded, an incentive management fee. The base management fee is typically 3.0% of gross hotel revenues or receipts, but ranges from 2.0% to 7.0%, the highest of which also include fees for additional non-management services. The incentive management fees range from 10% to 30% of net operating income (or other similar metric, as defined in the management agreement) remaining after deducting a priority return typically equal to 10% to 11% of our total capital investment in the hotel. We also pay certain accounting services fees to the management companies in a majority of the agreements. Many management agreements also require the maintenance of a capital reserve fund ranging between 4% and 5% of hotel revenues to be used for capital expenditures to maintain the quality of the hotels. 36 Termination Events Performance Termination Most of our management agreements for our brand-managed hotels align our interests with those of the management company by providing us with a right to terminate the agreement if the management company fails to achieve certain criteria relating to the performance of the hotel. We generally may initiate a performance termination if, during any two consecutive year period, (i) the hotel fails to achieve a specified amount of operating profit, and (ii) certain operating metrics of the hotel, as compared to a competitive set of hotels in the relevant local market as agreed between the parties, fail to exceed a specified threshold as set forth in the applicable management agreement. In substantially all of the management agreements for brand-managed hotels, the management company has a right to avoid a performance termination by paying an amount equal to the amount by which the operating profit for the two-year period was less than the performance termination threshold, as set forth in the applicable management agreement. Early Termination and Liquidated Damages Subject to certain qualifications, notice requirements and applicable cure periods, the management agreements for our brand- managed hotels are generally terminable by either party upon a material casualty or condemnation of the hotel or the occurrence of certain customary events of default, including, among others: the bankruptcy or insolvency of either party; the failure of either party to make a payment when due, and failure to cure such non-payment after due notice; or breach by either party of covenants or obligations under the management agreement. Additionally, the management company typically has the right to terminate the management agreement in certain situations, including the occurrence of certain actions with respect to the mortgage or our interference with the management company’s ability to operate the hotel by failing to approve required capital improvements or expenditures or by failing to complete or commence required repairs after damage or destruction to the hotel. Most of our agreements do not require payment of liquidated damages in the event of an early termination; however, our Marriott brand-managed hotels require us to establish a reserve fund out of gross revenues to be used in the event of a termination. The fund is to be used to reimburse the management company for all costs and expenses incurred by the management company that relate to (i) the operation of the hotel prior to termination but that accrue after termination, (ii) the management company terminating its employees and/or (iii) the payment of any pending or contingent claims, depending on the agreement. Sale of a Hotel Our management agreements for our brand-managed hotels generally provide that we cannot sell a hotel to a person who: (i) does not have sufficient financial resources, (ii) is of bad moral character, (iii) is a competitor, or (iv) is a specially designated national or blocked person, as set forth in the applicable management agreement. Under most agreements, we will default if we proceed with a sale without the management company’s consent and the assignment of the hotel’s management agreement. Some of the agreements provide that our sale or transfer of the hotel to an affiliate does not require us to obtain the consent of the management company. Management Agreements for Franchised Hotels Our franchised hotels are managed by various third party management companies, which are either independent or are affiliated with a hotel’s brand. As in our management agreements for brand-managed hotels, the management company controls the day-to-day operations of each hotel, and we are granted limited approval rights with respect to certain of the management company’s actions, including entering into long-term or high value contracts, engaging in certain actions relating to legal proceedings, approving the operating budget, making certain capital expenditures and the hiring of certain management personnel. Term Our management agreements for franchised hotels generally contain initial terms between seven and 15 years with an average remaining initial term of approximately five years. Almost all of these agreements either do not contemplate a renewal or extension of the initial term or cannot be extended without our consent, and the rest may be extended at the option of the management company if certain conditions are met. Assuming all renewal or extension options are exercised, the average remaining term is approximately eight years. Fees Generally, the management agreements for franchised hotels contain a two-tiered fee structure in which the management company receives a base management fee and, if certain financial thresholds are met or exceeded, an incentive management fee, 37 each calculated on a per hotel basis. The base management fees range from 1.5% to 4.0% of gross hotel revenue, with some base fees increasing over time. Almost all of the incentive management fees range from 15% to 30% of net operating income (or other similar metric, as defined in the management agreement) remaining after deducting a priority return typically equal to 9% to 11% of our total capital investment in the hotel. We also pay certain accounting services fees to the management companies under a majority of the agreements. Termination Events Performance Termination As with our management agreements for brand-managed hotels, most of the management agreements for franchised hotels provide us with a right to terminate the agreement if the management company fails to achieve certain criteria relating to the performance of the hotel. Generally, we may initiate a performance termination if, during any two consecutive year period, (i) the hotel fails to achieve a specified amount of operating profit, and (ii) certain operating metrics of the hotel, as compared to a competitive set of hotels in the relevant local market as agreed between the parties, fail to exceed a specified threshold as set forth in the applicable management agreement. In some of the management agreements for franchised hotels, the management company has a right, which can usually be exercised no more than once per hotel, to avoid a performance termination by paying an amount specified in the applicable management agreement. Early Termination and Liquidated Damages Subject to certain qualifications, notice requirements and applicable cure periods, the management agreements for franchised hotels are generally terminable by either party upon a material casualty or condemnation of the hotel or the occurrence of certain customary events of default, including, among others: the bankruptcy or insolvency of either party; a breach by either party of covenants or obligations under the management agreement, including a failure by us to provide required operating funds or our failure to make a payment when due and failure to cure such non-payment after due notice; a default by either party under the corresponding franchise agreement; a failure of either party to maintain a license for the sale of alcoholic beverages; and a failure by either party to maintain insurance policies required under the management agreement. In the event that a management company elects to terminate a management agreement due to certain events of default by us, the management company generally may recover a termination fee, as liquidated damages, as set forth in the applicable management agreement. Several of the management agreements for franchised hotels grant us a right to terminate without cause upon notice to the management company. In some instances, such termination requires the payment of a termination fee. Sale of a Hotel Under a majority of the management agreements for franchised hotels, in order to sell a hotel, we must terminate the management agreement and pay a fee to the management company. However, in some cases, we may avoid such fees if the new owner is either assigned the agreement or enters into a new agreement with the management company. Franchise Agreements Our franchised hotels operate under franchise agreements with Hilton and Marriott. Pursuant to our franchise agreements, we are granted rights to use the franchisor’s name, marks and system in the operation of our hotels. Franchisors also provide us with a variety of services and benefits, including centralized reservation systems, national advertising, marketing programs and publicity designed to increase brand awareness, training of personnel and maintenance of operational quality at hotels across the brand system. In return, our TRS lessees, as the franchisees, are required to operate franchised hotels consistent with the applicable brand standards. The franchise agreements generally specify management, operational, record-keeping, accounting, reporting and marketing standards and procedures with which our TRS lessees must comply, and ensure consistency across the brand by outlining standards for guest services, products, signage and furniture, fixtures and equipment, among other things. To ensure our compliance, most of the franchise agreements specify that we must make the hotel available for quality inspections by the franchisor. We are also required to participate in the applicable loyalty rewards program for each brand. Term A majority of our franchise agreements contain an initial term of 15 to 20 years, with an average remaining initial term of approximately 11 years. Almost all of our franchise agreements do not contemplate any renewals or extensions of the initial term. 38 Fees Substantially all of our franchise agreements require that we pay a royalty fee ranging between 2% and 6% of the gross room revenue of the applicable hotel and, for certain full service hotels, an additional fee ranging between 1% and 2.5% on gross food and beverage revenue. We must also pay marketing, reservation or other program fees ranging between 1% and 2.5% of the gross room revenue. In addition, under substantially all of our franchise agreements, the franchisor has the right to require that we renovate guest rooms and public facilities from time to time to comply with then-current brand standards. Under certain agreements, such expenditures are mandated at set periods, with at least some level of expenditure required every five to six years. Many franchise agreements also require the maintenance of a capital reserve fund ranging between 3% and 6% of hotel revenues to be used for capital expenditures to maintain the quality of the hotels. Termination Events Our franchise agreements provide for termination at the applicable franchisor’s option upon the occurrence of certain events, including, among others: the failure to maintain brand standards, the failure to pay royalties and fees or to perform other obligations under the franchise license; bankruptcy; and abandonment of the franchise or a change of control, and in the event of such termination, we are required to pay liquidated damages. Guarantee and Franchisor Rights The TRS lessee that is the franchisee is responsible for making all payments to the franchisor under the applicable franchise agreement; however, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., XHR LP and/or the corresponding property-owning subsidiary generally guarantee the TRS lessee’s obligations under the franchise agreements. In addition, some of the franchise agreements require that we provide the franchisor with a right of first offer or right of first refusal in the event of certain sales or transfers of a hotel, and almost all of our agreements provide the franchisor the right to approve any change in the hotel’s management company. TRS Leases In order for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT, neither our company nor any of our subsidiaries, including the Operating Partnership, may directly or indirectly operate our hotels. Subsidiaries of our Operating Partnership, as lessors, lease our hotels to our TRS lessees, which, in turn, are parties to the existing hotel management agreements with third-party hotel management companies for each of our hotels. 39 Ground Leases The following table summarizes the remaining primary term, renewal rights, purchase rights and monthly base rent as of December 31, 2016 associated with land underlying our hotels and meeting facilities that we lease from third parties: Property Ground lease: Entire Property Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel Hyatt Regency Santa Clara Current Lease Term Expiration Renewal Rights / Purchase Rights Current Monthly Minimum or Base Rent (1) Base Rent Increases at Renewal Lease Type December 31, 2057 No renewal rights (2) $192,297(3) Not applicable Triple Net April 30, 2035 4 x 10 years, 1 x 9 years (4) $60,119 Triple Net Triple Net No increase unless lessee exercises its option to expand at which time base rent will be increased by $800 for each additional hotel room in excess of 500 No increase unless hotel is expanded beyond 356 guest rooms, at which time rent shall increase on a pro rata basis (5) Marriott Charleston Town Center December 11, 2032 4 x 10 years $4,167 Hotel Commonwealth December 19, 2087 None $0.83 Not applicable Triple Net Ground lease: Partial Property Convention Center at Marriott Woodlands Waterway Hotel & Convention Center June 30, 2100 No renewal $10,290(7) Not applicable Triple Net rights (6) (1) In addition to minimum rent, the Company may owe variable incentive rent. In particular, Hyatt Regency Santa Clara incurs variable incentive rent based on a percentage of rooms revenue and ballroom receipts, which has exceeded the minimum base rent for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. (2) The Company has a right of first refusal to purchase the property, which must be exercised within 30 days of receiving the third party’s terms from Landlord. (3) For and during the period from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2029, the Minimum Rent for each year is adjusted based on a calculation tied to the Consumer Price Index. From January 1, 2030 through the remainder of the lease terminating on December 31, 2057, the minimum rent will be redetermined each ten-year period. The monthly minimum or base rent in this chart is for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. (4) The Company has a right of first refusal to purchase all or a portion of certain areas covered by the two separate leases. (5) If the hotel is increased from 356 to 500 rooms, the new annual base rent will increase to $72 thousand. (6) The Company has a right of first refusal to purchase the property, which must be exercised within 60 days of receiving the third party’s terms from the landlord. (7) The base rent for each year is adjusted based on a calculation tied to the Consumer Price Index. The monthly minimum or base rent in this chart is for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. 40 Item 3. Legal Proceedings We are involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business, including proceedings involving tort and other general liability claims, workers’ compensation and other employee claims and claims related to our ownership of certain hotel properties. Most occurrences involving liability, claims of negligence and employees are covered by insurance with solvent insurance carriers. We recognize a liability when we believe the loss is probable and reasonably estimable. We currently believe that the ultimate outcome of such lawsuits and proceedings will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material effect on our combined consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. 41 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Market Information Our common stock began trading on the NYSE under the symbol “XHR” on February 4, 2015. The following tables sets forth, for the period indicated, the high and low closing prices per share and the cash dividends declared: First Quarter (1) Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter 2016 2015 High Low Dividend High Low Dividend $16.19 $16.81 $17.96 $19.62 $12.73 $14.60 $15.01 $14.98 $0.275 $24.24 $0.275 $24.39 $0.275 $22.71 $0.275 $19.09 $20.12 $21.29 $17.11 $15.15 $0.148 $0.230 $0.230 $0.230 (1) For 2015, the first quarter only includes the period from February 4, 2015, the date of our listing on the NYSE, to March 31, 2015. The closing price per share of our common stock on December 30, 2016, as reported by the NYSE, was $19.42. On February 24, 2017, the closing stock price of our common stock was $18.30. Shareholder Information As of February 24, 2017, there were 16,563 holders of record of our outstanding common stock. This stockholder figure does not include a substantially greater number of “street name” holders, or beneficial holders, of our common stock whose shares are held by bank, brokers and other financial institutions. Also at February 24, 2017 there were thirteen holders (other than our company) of our Operating Partnership Units comprising certain of our current and former executive officers and members of our Board of Directors. A majority of the Operating Partnership Units are currently unvested. Subject to certain restrictions, our Operating Partnership Units are redeemable for cash or, at our election, for our common shares. In order to comply with certain requirements related to our qualification as a REIT, our charter, subject to certain exceptions, contains restrictions on the number of shares of our stock that a person may own. Our charter provides that no person may beneficially or constructively own more than 9.8% in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our capital stock. Dividends We anticipate making regular quarterly distributions to stockholders. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must distribute to our stockholders an amount at least equal to: i. 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined before the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain (which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”)); plus ii. 90% of the excess of our net income from foreclosure property over the tax imposed on such income by the Code; less iii. any excess non-cash income (as determined under the Code). Distributions made by us will be authorized and determined by our Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, out of legally available funds, and will be dependent upon a number of factors, including our actual and projected results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and liquidity, our qualification as a REIT and other tax considerations, capital expenditures, and other obligations, debt covenants, contractual prohibitions or other limitations under applicable law and other such matters our Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time. We cannot assure you that our distribution policy will remain the same in the future, or that any estimated distributions will be made or sustained. Our ability to make distributions to our stockholders will depend upon the performance of our asset portfolio. Distributions will be made in cash to the extent cash is available for distribution. We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to pay distributions to our stockholders. To the extent that our cash available for distribution is less than the amount required to be distributed under the REIT provisions of the Code, we may consider various funding sources to cover any shortfall, including borrowing under our $400 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility, selling certain of our assets or using a portion of the net proceeds we receive from future offerings of equity, equity-related or debt securities or declaring taxable common stock dividends. 42 The method used by common stockholders to receive distributions may affect the timing of the distributions. The Company treats all shareholders as constructively receiving distributions on the distribution date, regardless of the distribution method chosen by the stockholder. To change the method used to receive distributions the stockholder will fill out the Xenia Change of Distribution Election form found on the “Investor Relations” page of our website. In addition, our charter allows us to issue preferred stock that could have a preference over our common stock as to distributions. In addition, our Board of Directors could change our distribution policy in the future. The following tables set forth information regarding the declaration, payment and income tax characterization of distributions paid per share for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016. Common Stock The Company paid the following dividends on common stock during the year ended December 31, 2016 (1): Dividend per Share/Unit For the Quarter Ended $0.275 $0.275 $0.275 $0.275 March 31, 2016 June 30, 2016 September 30, 2016 December 31, 2016 Record Date March 31, 2016 June 30, 2016 September 30, 2016 December 31, 2016 Payable Date April 15, 2016 July 15, 2016 October 14, 2016 January 13, 2017 (1) For income tax purposes, dividends paid per share on our common stock in 2016 were 100% taxable as ordinary income. The Company paid the following dividends on common stock during the year ended December 31, 2015 (1): Dividend per Share/Unit For the Quarter Ended $0.148(2) $0.23 $0.23 $0.23 March 31, 2015 June 30, 2015 September 30, 2015 December 31, 2015 Record Date March 31, 2015 June 30, 2015 September 30, 2015 December 31, 2015 Payable Date April 15, 2015 July 15, 2015 October 15, 2015 January 15, 2016 (1) For income tax purposes, dividends paid per share on our common stock in 2015 were 100% taxable as ordinary income. (2) Represents the Company’s anticipated regular quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share, prorated for the period from February 3, 2015 through March 31, 2015 rounded to the nearest tenth of a penny. Preferred Stock The Company paid the following dividends on its 12.5% Series A preferred stock during the year ended December 31, 2015 (1): Dividend per Share For the Period Ended June 30, 2015 Record Date June 15, 2015 Payable Date June 30, 2015 September 30, 2015 September 30, 2015 September 30, 2015 $61.11(2) $31.25(3) (1) For income tax purposes, dividends paid per share on our preferred stock were 100% taxable as ordinary income. (2) Represents the Company’s anticipated regular semi-annual dividend of $62.50 per share, prorated for the period from January 5, 2015 through June 30, 2015. (3) Represents the Company’s anticipated regular semi-annual dividend of $62.50 per share prorated for the period from July 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015. This dividend was paid in connection with the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock on September 30, 2015, and constitutes accrued but unpaid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock as of the redemption date. 43 Share Performance Graph The following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, except that which we specifically incorporate by reference into such filing. The following graph provides a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common shares from February 4, 2015, to the NYSE closing price per share on December 30, 2016, with the cumulative total return on the Dow Jones U.S. Hotel and Lodging REIT Index (“DJUSHL REIT Index”), the Russell 2000 Index (the “Russell 2000 Index”) and the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity REITs Index (the “FTSE NAREIT Equity Index”) for the same period. Total return values were calculated assuming a $100 investment on February 4, 2015 with reinvestment of all dividends in (i) our common shares, (ii) the DJUSHL REIT Index, (iii) the Russell 2000 Index and (iv) the FTSE NAREIT Equity Index. The total return values do not include any dividends declared, but not paid, during the period. Total Return Performance e u l a V x e d n I 125 100 75 50 02/05/15 12/31/15 Period Ending 12/31/16 Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. DJUSHL REIT Index Russell 2000 Index FTSE NAREIT All Equity Index The actual returns shown on the graph above are as follows: Name Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. DJUSHL REIT Index Russell 2000 Index FTSE NAREIT Equity Index Sale of Unregistered Securities Value of Investment at February 4, 2015 Value of Investment at December 31, 2015 Value of Investment at December 31, 2016 $ $ $ $ 100 100 100 100 $ $ $ $ 77.55 72.24 95.34 96.85 $ $ $ $ 105.36 85.80 113.91 105.21 On January 5, 2015, Xenia issued 125 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock in a private placement to approximately 125 investors who qualified as “accredited investors” (as that term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act) for an aggregate purchase price of $125,000 in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D, relative to transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering, to the extent an exemption from such registration was required. On September 30, 2015, the Company redeemed all 125 outstanding shares of its Series A Preferred Stock for $1,000 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $31.25 per share, and a $100.00 per share redemption premium, for an aggregate per share redemption price of $1,131.25. Following the redemption, in accordance with the Company’s charter, the Board of Directors of the Company reclassified the redeemed shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock as authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock without designation as to series. In connection therewith, on November 10, 2015, the Company filed Articles Supplementary and Articles of Restatement (the “Revised Articles”) to the Company’s charter with the State Department of Assessments & Taxation of Maryland. The only change made to the existing charter of the Company in the Revised Articles was to reflect the reclassification of the Series A Preferred Stock as Preferred Stock without designation as described above. 44 Also on September 30, 2015, and in connection with the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock described above, the Operating Partnership redeemed all 125 of its Series A Preferred Units that were held by the Company for $1,000 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $31.25 per share, and a $100.00 per share redemption premium, for an aggregate per unit redemption price of $1,131.25. In connection therewith, on November 10, 2015, the Company entered into the Fourth Amended & Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of XHR LP (the “Fourth LP Agreement”). The Fourth LP Agreement amended the previous agreement to reflect the redemption of the Series A Preferred Units and restate the Agreement to include the terms of a prior amendment within the Fourth LP Agreement. Information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under “Part III-Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,” of this Annual Report and such information is incorporated by reference herein. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities In December 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program (the “Repurchase Program”) pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to $100 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock, par value $0.01, per share, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans. The Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date. The Company is not obligated to repurchase any dollar amount or any number of shares of common stock, and repurchases may be suspended or discontinued at any time. In November 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $75 million of the Company’s outstanding common shares. During the year ended December 31, 2015, no shares were repurchased under the Repurchase Program. From January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, the Company repurchased 4,966,763 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $14.89 per share for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $74 million. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $101 million remaining under its share repurchase authorization. The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s purchase of shares of its common stock pursuant to its Repurchase Program during the quarter ended December 31, 2016: Period October 1 to October 31, 2016 November 1 to November 30, 2016 December 1 to December 31, 2016 Total Total Number of Shares Purchased Weighted Average Price Paid Per Share 335,715 165,000 — 500,715 $ $ $ 15.35 15.52 — 15.41 Total Numbers of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program (in thousands) 335,715 165,000 — 500,715 $ $ $ 28,584 101,024 101,024 45 Item 6. Selected Financial Data You should read the following summary historical consolidated financial and operating data together with “Part II-Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Part I-Item 1. Business,” “Part I-Item 2. Properties,” and the combined consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following table shows our combined consolidated selected financial data relating to our combined consolidated historical financial condition and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012 (in thousands, except per share amounts): Revenues: Room revenues Food and beverage revenues Other revenues Total revenues Expenses: Room expenses Food and beverage expenses Other direct expenses Other indirect expenses Management fees Total hotel operating expenses Depreciation and amortization 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 653,944 $ 663,224 $ 631,901 $ 443,267 $ 246,479 49,737 259,036 53,884 235,066 59,699 168,368 40,236 2012 323,959 116,260 26,661 950,160 $ 976,144 $ 926,666 $ 651,871 $ 466,880 $ $ 146,050 161,699 12,848 224,135 47,605 148,492 167,840 17,984 226,108 49,818 140,128 158,243 28,556 214,272 52,104 96,444 114,011 21,110 157,385 37,683 70,165 78,080 17,401 115,229 26,827 $ 592,337 $ 610,242 $ 593,303 $ 426,633 $ 307,702 152,418 148,009 141,807 104,229 Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance Ground lease expense General and administrative expenses Business management fees Acquisition transaction costs Pre-opening expenses Provision for asset impairments Separation and other start-up related expenses Total expenses Operating income Gain (loss) on sale of investment properties Other income (loss) Interest expense Loss on extinguishment of debt Equity in losses and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net Income (loss) before income taxes Income tax expense Net income (loss) from continuing operations Net income (loss) from discontinued operations Net income (loss) Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities (Note 5) Non-controlling interests of common units in Operating Partnership (Note 1) Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests Net income (loss) attributable to Company Distributions to preferred stockholders Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders 49,717 5,204 25,556 — 5,046 1,411 — 26,887 872,072 104,072 43,015 4,916 (50,816) (5,761) — 95,426 (6,295) 89,131 (489) 88,642 567 (451) 116 88,758 (12) 88,746 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 46,248 5,447 32,018 — 154 — 10,035 — 838,657 111,503 $ $ 30,195 3,377 (48,113) (5,155) — 91,807 (5,077) 86,730 — 86,730 268 $ $ $ (1,143) (875) $ 85,855 — 85,855 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 46 44,625 5,541 38,895 1,474 1,192 — 5,378 — 29,763 1,923 13,445 12,743 2,275 — 49,145 — 832,215 94,451 $ $ 640,156 11,715 $ $ — (1,113) (52,792) — (33) 89,629 22,382 2,126 9,008 10,812 751 — — — 442,410 24,470 (589) 798 (45,061) — (3,719) $ $ $ (42,223) $ (24,101) (3,619) (45,842) $ (5,626) (3,695) (27,796) (12,661) (51,468) $ (40,457) — — (5,689) — — $ — $ (5,689) 109,799 — 109,799 $ $ (51,468) $ (46,146) — — (51,468) $ (46,146) 693 324 (57,427) (1,713) 4,216 40,544 (5,865) 34,679 75,120 109,799 — — 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2015 2012 Basic and diluted earnings per share: Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders Income from discontinued operations available to common stockholders Net income per share available to common stockholders Weighted average number of common shares (basic) Weighted average number of common shares (diluted) Selected Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, Net investment properties, excluding assets held for sale(1)(2) Cash and cash equivalents Dividends declared on common stock Total assets(1)(2) Total debt, excluding held for sale(1)(2) Total equity Other Financial Data: Adjusted EBITDA(3) Adjusted FFO(3) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 0.79 — 0.79 $ $ 0.79 — 0.79 $ $ 0.31 0.66 0.97 $ $ (0.40) $ (0.05) (0.45) $ (0.30) (0.11) (0.41) 108,012,708 111,989,686 113,397,997 113,397,997 113,397,997 108,142,998 112,138,223 113,397,997 113,397,997 113,397,997 2,443,589 216,054 118,898 2,860,345 1,077,132 1,651,567 287,328 238,252 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,414,799 122,154 93,576 3,005,944 1,094,536 1,743,358 293,010 241,632 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,449,260 163,053 — 2,949,076 1,197,563 1,520,921 241,348 182,732 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,511,646 89,169 — 3,756,658 1,280,220 1,818,255 165,476 111,663 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,646,392 65,004 — 2,878,708 1,011,421 1,217,977 201,589 116,171 (1) As of December 31, 2015, excludes the assets held for sale and the liabilities associated with assets held for sale for the nine hotels sold during the year ended December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, these assets were included in net investment properties, total assets, and total debt. (2) As of December 31, 2014, excludes the assets held for sale and the liabilities associated with assets held for sale for the Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville and the Hyatt Regency Orange County. As December 31, 2013 and 2012, these assets were included in net investment properties, total assets, and total debt. (3) See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a detailed description and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted FFO attributable to common stock and unit holders and a description of how these performance measures are useful to investors as key supplemental measures of our operating performance. 47 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the combined consolidated financial statements and related notes included herein this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements about our business. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially because of factors discussed in “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Part I-Item 1A. Risk Factors” contained in this Annual Report and in our other reports that we file from time to time with the SEC. Overview Xenia is a self-advised and self-administered REIT that invests primarily in premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotels, with a focus on the Top 25 Markets as well as key leisure destinations in the U.S. As of December 31, 2016, we owned 42 hotels, 40 of which are wholly owned, comprising 10,911 rooms, across 20 states and the District of Columbia, including a majority interest in two hotels owned through two investments in real estate entities. Our hotels are primarily operated and/or licensed by industry leaders such as Marriott ®, Kimpton ®, Hyatt ®, Aston ®, Fairmont ®, Hilton ®, and Loews ®, as well as leading independent management companies. We plan to grow our business through a differentiated acquisition strategy, aggressive asset management and capital investment in our properties. We primarily target markets and sub-markets with particular positive characteristics, such as multiple demand generators, favorable supply and demand dynamics and attractive projected room revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) growth with a focus on the Top 25 Markets as well as key leisure destinations. We believe our focus on a broader range of markets allows us to evaluate a greater number of acquisition opportunities and thereby be highly selective in our pursuit of only those opportunities which best fit our investment criteria. We primarily own and pursue hotels in the premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotel segments that are affiliated with premium leading brands, as we believe that these segments yield attractive risk-adjusted returns. Within these segments, we focus on hotels that will provide guests with a distinctive lodging experience, tailored to reflect local market environments rather than hotels that are heavily dependent on conventions and group business. We also seek properties that exhibit an opportunity for us to enhance operating performance through aggressive asset management and targeted capital investment. While we do not operate our hotel properties, our asset management team and our executive management team monitor and work cooperatively with our hotel managers by conducting regular revenue, sales, and financial performance reviews and also perform in-depth on-site reviews focused on ongoing operating margin improvement initiatives. We interact frequently with our management companies and on-site management personnel, including conducting regular meetings with key executives of our management companies and brands. Through these efforts, we seek to improve property efficiencies, lower costs, maximize revenues, and enhance property operating margins which we expect will enhance returns to our stockholders. Basis of Presentation On February 3, 2015, Xenia was spun off from InvenTrust. Prior to the separation, we effectuated certain Reorganization Transactions which were designed to consolidate the ownership of our hotels into our Operating Partnership; consolidate our TRS lessees in our TRS; facilitate our separation from InvenTrust; and enable us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. The accompanying combined consolidated financial statements prior to the spin-off have been “carved out” of InvenTrust’s consolidated financial statements and reflect significant assumptions and allocations. The combined consolidated financial statements reflect our operations after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions, the disposition of other hotels previously owned by us, and the spin-off, and include allocations of costs from certain corporate and shared functions provided to us by InvenTrust, as well as costs associated with participation by certain of our executives in InvenTrust’s benefit plans. Corporate costs directly associated with our principal executive offices, personnel and other administrative costs are reflected as general and administrative expenses on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Additionally, prior to the spin-off, InvenTrust allocated to us a portion of its corporate overhead costs based upon our percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust, which is reflected in general and administrative expenses. Based on these presentation matters, these financials may not be comparable to prior periods. In addition, certain reclassifications were made for presentation of lodging related activities on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2015. We have made a joint election with InvenTrust under section 336(e) of the Code with respect to our spin-off from InvenTrust. As a result of that election, our tax basis in our assets has been stepped up to their fair market value as of the date of the spin-off. The increased tax basis in our assets will increase the depreciation deductions we are allowed to claim over the useful life of these assets. 48 Self-Management of InvenTrust From our formation in 2007 until March 2014, our management team, which had continuously been dedicated to InvenTrust’s entire hotel portfolio, including our portfolio and the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, was employed by InvenTrust’s external manager, Inland American Business Manager and Advisor, Inc. (the “Business Manager”), or one of its affiliates. On March 12, 2014, InvenTrust entered into a series of agreements and amendments to existing agreements with affiliates of The Inland Group, Inc. pursuant to which InvenTrust began the process of becoming entirely self-managed (collectively, the “Self-Management Transactions”). After the Self-Management Transactions, our management team and our other employees ceased to be employed by the Business Manager or one of its affiliates and became our employees. In connection with the Self-Management Transactions, InvenTrust agreed with the Business Manager to terminate the management agreement with the Business Manager, hire all of the Business Manager’s employees, and acquire the assets or rights necessary to conduct the functions previously performed for InvenTrust by the Business Manager. Prior to the Self-Management Transactions, we were allocated a portion of the business management fee based upon our percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust. The Self- Management Transactions resulted in a final business management fee incurred in January 2014. As a result, the Company has not been allocated a business management fee after January 2014. Separation from InvenTrust As a result of the separation, we and InvenTrust operate separately, each as an independent company. In connection with and in order to effectuate the separation and distribution, we and InvenTrust entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement. In addition, we entered into various other agreements with InvenTrust to effect the separation and provide a framework for our relationship with InvenTrust post-separation, such as a Transition Services Agreement and an Employee Matters Agreement. These agreements provided for the allocation between us and InvenTrust of InvenTrust’s assets, liabilities and obligations (including its properties, employees and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to, at and after our separation from InvenTrust and governs certain relationships between us and InvenTrust after the separation. For more information regarding these agreements, see “Part III-Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” Market Outlook The U.S. lodging industry exhibited modest growth fundamentals throughout 2016, indicating softening in the market. Lodging demand has historically exhibited a strong correlation to U.S. GDP growth, which continued to grow at a modest 1.6% during 2016 driven by business investment growth and a stronger labor force leading to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar. Overall the U.S. economy has been negatively impacted by the global economy and other factors, such as continued turbulence in the energy markets, political changes in the U.S. and abroad, as well as potential health concerns impacting travel. For the full year 2016, industry RevPAR increased by a moderate 3.2%, which was primarily driven by ADR growth of 3.1% and a relatively flat occupancy increase of 0.1%. Increases in industry RevPAR are expected to continue at modest levels in 2017, as overall fundamentals between supply and demand are not as favorable compared to other periods during the current cycle. Supply growth is expected to outpace demand growth compared to historical levels, which could lead to the industry’s first occupancy decline since the start of the current cycle and ADR growth is expected to slow compared to 2016. Our strategy of targeting primarily the Top 25 Markets and key leisure destinations has proved to be beneficial as the majority of our markets do not see the same impact of the strengthening dollar, new supply and alternative rental accommodations as seen in other gateway markets. However, the Houston-area, where 11% of our rooms are concentrated, continues to be challenged due to weakness in corporate demand and new supply additions in the market. While these unfavorable trends in the Houston-area are expected to continue in 2017, we expect the negative impact on operations will be at a slower rate than in 2016. In December 2016, we reduced our exposure in the Houston-area by completing the sale of the 162-room Homewood Suites by Hilton Houston near the Galleria. In 2017, we expect a decrease in earnings from the sale of nine hotels completed during 2016, however, we anticipate these sales to have an overall positive impact on key performance measures as these dispositions had average RevPAR significantly below the average for the remainder of our portfolio. We also expect some disruption in 2017 from renovations at existing properties as we have accelerated capital projects to enhance the quality of our portfolio while taking advantage of the current cycle. We will benefit from a full year of operating results from the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth in January 2016, the continued ramp up in operating income of the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook hotel developments that opened in the second half of 2015, and we expect favorable results driven by our specific property-level initiatives. As noted above, the current outlook for the lodging industry is uncertain; therefore, there can be no assurances that any increases in hotel revenues or earnings at our properties will occur for any number of reasons, including, but not limited to, slower than 49 anticipated growth in the U.S. or global economy, changes in travel patterns for business and leisure, and continued volatility in the energy markets. See “Part I-Item 1A. Risk Factors.” Significant Events The following events were significant highlights during the year ended December 31, 2016: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • In January 2016, the Company acquired the 245-room Hotel Commonwealth in Boston, Massachusetts for $136 million. The purchase was partially funded with a $125 million, seven-year term loan, at closing. In January 2016, the Company obtained a $60 million, seven-year mortgage on the Hotel Palomar Philadelphia. In February 2016 the Company sold the 248-room Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville in Gainesville, Florida for $36 million. Upon sale, the Company paid off the $27.8 million mortgage loan collateralized by the hotel. In February 2016, the Company refinanced the $49 million mortgage on the Grand Bohemian Hotel Orlando with a new loan and obtained an additional $11 million in proceeds. In April 2016, the Company sold the 220-room DoubleTree by Hilton in Washington DC for $65 million. In May, the Company sold the 223-room Embassy Suites Baltimore North / Hunt Valley in Maryland for $20 million. In June 2016, the Company sold the 287-room Marriott Atlanta Century Center / Emory Area in Atlanta, Georgia and the 226-room Hilton Phoenix Suites in Phoenix, Arizona for a combined price of $50.8 million. In June, the Company elected its prepayment option on the Courtyard Pittsburgh Downtown mortgage loan and repaid the outstanding balance of $22.3 million. In September 2016, the Company paid off the $97 million mortgage loan collateralized by the Renaissance Atlanta Waverly Hotel & Convention Center. In October 2016, the Company paid off three mortgage loans, collateralized by Renaissance Austin Hotel, Courtyard Birmingham Downtown at UAB, and Marriott Griffin Gate Resort and Spa, which totaled $130 million. In October 2016, the Company modified the loans collateralized by the Marriott Dallas City Center and the Hyatt Regency Santa Clara. The amendments resulted in $11 million and $30 million of additional proceeds, respectively, and extended the loan maturity dates to January 2022. In 2016, the Company completed upgrades on the former Hyatt Key West Resort & Spa, which included the renovations of the Blue Mojito Bar, Jala Spa and the addition of two guest rooms. Following the expansive renovation, in November, the hotel was rebranded as a Hyatt Centric, part of Hyatt’s new lifestyle hotel concept. In December 2016, the Company sold four hotels for an aggregate price of $118.5 million. This included the 195-room Hilton St. Louis Downtown at the Arch, the 148-room Hampton Inn & Suites Denver Downtown, the 178-room Hilton Garden Inn Chicago North Shore/Evanston, and 162-room Homewood Suites by Hilton Houston Near the Galleria. For the year ended December 31, 2016, 4,966,763 shares had been repurchased under the Repurchase Program, at a weighted average price $14.89 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $74 million. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $101 million remaining under its share repurchase authorization. Our Customers We generate a significant portion of our revenue from the following broad customer groups: transient business, group business and contract business. Transient business broadly represents individual business or leisure travelers. Business travelers make up the majority of transient demand at our hotels. Therefore, we will be more affected by trends in business travel than trends in leisure demand. Group business represents clusters of guestrooms booked together, usually with a minimum of 10 rooms. Contract business refers to blocks of rooms sold to a specific company for an extended period of time at significantly discounted rates. Airline crews are typical generators of contract demand at some of our hotels. Additionally, contract rates may be utilized by hotels that are located in markets that are experiencing consistently lower levels of demand. 50 Our Revenues and Expenses Revenues Our revenues are derived from hotel operations and are composed of the following sources: • Room revenues - Represents the sale of room rentals at our hotel properties and accounts for a substantial majority of our total revenue. Occupancy and ADR are the major drivers of room revenue. The business mix and distribution channel mix of the hotels are significant determinants of ADR. • Food and beverage revenues - Occupancy and the type of customer staying at the hotel are the major drivers of food and beverage revenue (i.e., group business typically generates more food and beverage business through catering functions when compared to transient business, which may or may not utilize the hotel’s food and beverage outlets). • Other revenues - Represents ancillary revenue such as parking, telephone and other guest services, and tenant leases. Our transition to the Eleventh Revised Edition of USALI during the year ended December 31, 2015, resulted in resort fees being recorded in other revenues rather than room revenues. Occupancy and the nature of the property are the main drivers of other revenue. Expenses Our operating expenses consist of costs to provide hotel services and corporate-level expenses. The following are components of our expenses: • Room expenses - These costs include housekeeping wages and payroll taxes, room supplies, laundry services and front desk costs. Similar to room revenue, occupancy is the major driver of room expense and as a result, room expense has a significant correlation to room revenue. These costs as a percentage of revenue can increase based on increases in salaries and wages, as well as on the level of service and amenities that are provided. • Food and beverage expenses - These expenses primarily include food, beverage and associated labor costs. Occupancy and the type of customer staying at the hotel are major drivers of food and beverage expense (i.e., catered functions generally are more profitable than on-property food and beverage outlet sales), which correlates closely with food and beverage revenue. • Other direct expenses - These expenses primarily include labor and other costs associated with other revenues, such as parking and other guest services. • Other indirect expenses - These expenses primarily include hotel costs associated with general and administrative, sales and marketing, information technology and telecommunications, repairs and maintenance and utility costs. • Management fees - Base management fees are computed as a percentage of gross revenue. The management fees also include incentive management fees, which are typically a percentage of net operating income (or similar measurement of hotel profitability) above an annual threshold based on our total capital investment in the hotel. Franchise fees are computed as a percentage of rooms revenue. See “Part I-Item 2. Our Principal Agreements.” • Depreciation and amortization expense - These are non-cash expenses that primarily consist of depreciation of fixed assets such as buildings, furniture, fixtures and equipment at our hotels, as well as certain corporate assets. Amortization expense primarily consists of amortization of acquired advance bookings, which are amortized over the life of the related lease or term. • Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance - Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance includes the payments due in the respective jurisdictions where our hotels are located, partially offset by refunds from prior year real estate tax appeals, and payments due under insurance policies for our hotel portfolio. • Ground lease expense - The ground lease expense represents the monthly base rent associated with land underlying our hotels and/or meeting facilities that we lease from third parties. It also includes the above and below market lease amortization for lease intangibles determined as part of the initial purchase price allocation at acquisition. • General and administrative expenses - General and administrative expenses primarily consists of compensation expense for our corporate staff and personnel supporting our business, office administrative and related expenses, 51 state sales and franchise taxes, legal and professional fees, and other corporate costs. Corporate costs directly associated with Xenia’s principal executive offices, personnel and other administrative costs are reflected as general and administrative expense on the combined consolidated financial statements. Additionally, prior to our spin-off in February 2015, InvenTrust allocated to Xenia a portion of corporate overhead costs incurred by InvenTrust which was based upon Xenia’s percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust and was reflected in general and administrative expense. Upon our separation from InvenTrust, we were no longer allocated a portion of InvenTrust’s corporate overhead. We were a party to a Transition Services Agreement with InvenTrust, pursuant to which we were to be charged agreed-upon amounts for the corporate services we received. We discontinued the use of these services in the second quarter of 2015 and as a result we were no longer charged any amounts under such agreement. • Business management fee - During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, InvenTrust paid an annual business management fee to the Business Manager based on the average invested assets. We were allocated a portion of the business management fee based upon our percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust. On March 12, 2014, InvenTrust entered into the Self-Management Transactions. After the Self- Management Transactions, our management team and our other employees ceased to be employed by the Business Manager or one of its affiliates and became our employees. In connection with the Self-Management Transactions, InvenTrust agreed with the Business Manager to terminate the management agreement with the Business Manager, hire all of the Business Manager’s employees and acquire the assets or rights necessary to conduct the functions previously performed for InvenTrust by the Business Manager. The Self-Management Transactions resulted in a final business management fee incurred in January 2014. As a result, we were not allocated a business management fee after January 2014. • Pre-opening expenses - Pre-opening expenses are related to grand opening costs for ground-up development projects and are costs that are not capitalized. The Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook were completed and opened to the public in 2015. • Acquisition transaction costs - Acquisition transaction costs typically consist of legal fees, other professional fees, transfer taxes and other direct costs associated with our pursuit of hotel investments. As a result, these costs will vary depending on our level of ongoing acquisition activity. • • Provision for asset impairment - Our real estate, intangible assets and other long-lived assets are generally held for the long-term. We assess the carrying values of our long-lived assets and evaluate these assets for impairment as discussed in “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.” These evaluations have, in the past, resulted in impairment losses for certain of these assets based on the specific facts and circumstances surrounding those assets and our estimates of the fair value of those assets. Based on economic conditions or other factors applicable to a specific property, we may be required to take additional impairment losses to reflect further declines in our asset and/or investment values. Separation and other startup related expenses - We incurred expenses related to our spin-off from InvenTrust in 2015. This included fees paid to unrelated third parties, the listing of our common stock on the NYSE, costs related to the tender offer and other startup costs incurred while transitioning to a stand-alone, publicly traded company. Most categories of variable operating expenses, including labor costs such as housekeeping, fluctuate with changes in occupancy. Increases in occupancy are accompanied by increases in most categories of variable operating expenses, while increases in ADR typically only result in increases in limited categories of operating costs and expenses, such as management fees and franchise fees, which are based on hotel revenues. Thus, changes in ADR have a more significant impact on operating margins than changes in occupancy. Factors that May Affect Results of Operations The principal factors affecting our operating results include overall demand for hotel rooms compared to the supply of available hotel rooms, economic conditions, and the ability of our third-party management companies to increase or maintain revenues while controlling expenses. • Demand and economic conditions - Consumer demand for lodging, especially business travel, is closely linked to the performance of the overall economy and is sensitive to business and personal discretionary spending levels. Declines in consumer demand due to adverse general economic conditions, risks affecting or reducing travel 52 patterns, lower consumer confidence and adverse political conditions can lower the revenues and profitability of our hotel operations. As a result, changes in consumer demand and general business cycles can subject and have subjected our revenues to significant volatility. See “Part I-Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry.” • Supply - New hotel room supply is an important factor that can affect the lodging industry’s performance. Room rates and occupancy, and thus RevPAR, tend to increase when demand growth exceeds supply growth. The addition of new competitive hotels affects the ability of existing hotels to drive growth in RevPAR, and thus profits. New development is driven largely by construction costs, the availability of financing and expected performance of existing hotels. • Third-party hotel managers - We depend on the performance of third-party hotel management companies that manage the operations of each of our hotels under long-term agreements. Our operating results could be materially and adversely affected if any of our third-party managers fail to provide quality services and amenities, or otherwise fail to manage our hotels in our best interest. We believe we have good relationships with our third-party managers and are committed to the continued growth and development of these relationships. • • Fixed nature of expenses - Many of the expenses associated with operating our hotels are relatively fixed. These expenses include certain personnel costs, rent, property taxes, insurance and utilities, as well as sales and marketing expenses. If we are unable to decrease these costs significantly or rapidly when demand for our hotels decreases, the resulting decline in our revenues can have an adverse effect on our net cash flow, margins and profits. This effect can be especially pronounced during periods of economic contraction or slow economic growth. Seasonality - The lodging industry is seasonal in nature, which can be expected to cause fluctuations in our hotel room revenues, occupancy levels, room rates, operating expenses and cash flows. The periods during which our hotels experience higher or lower levels of demand vary from property to property and depend upon location, type of property and competitive mix within the specific location. Based on historical results for our portfolio, our revenues and operating income are lowest during the first quarter of each year, which we expect to be consistent from year to year for our current portfolio. • Competition - The lodging industry is highly competitive. Our hotels compete with other hotels and alternative accommodations for guests in each of their markets based on a number of factors, including, among others, room rates, quality of accommodations, service levels and amenities, location, brand affiliation, reputation, and reservation systems. Competition is often specific to the individual markets in which our hotels are located and includes competition from existing and new hotels. We believe that hotels, such as those in our portfolio, will enjoy the competitive advantages associated with operating under nationally recognized brands. Key Indicators of Operating Performance We measure hotel results of operations and the operating performance of our business by evaluating financial and non-financial metrics such as RevPAR; ADR; OCC; EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA; FFO and Adjusted FFO. We evaluate individual hotel and company-wide performance with comparisons to budgets, prior periods and competing properties. ADR, occupancy and RevPAR may be impacted by macroeconomic factors as well as regional and local economies and events. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for further discussion of the Company’s use, definitions and limitations of EBITDA, FFO, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted FFO. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates General The preparation of combined consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We consider the following policies critical because they require the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments and include estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain, involve various assumptions, require management judgment, and because they are important for understanding and evaluating our reported financial results. As a result, these accounting policies could materially affect our financial position, results of operations and related disclosures. We evaluate our estimates, assumptions and judgments on an ongoing basis, based on information that is then available to us, our historical experiences and various matters that we believe are reasonable and appropriate for 53 consideration under the circumstances. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates due to changes in judgments, assumptions and conditions as a result of unforeseen events or otherwise, which could have a material impact on financial position or results of operations. All of our significant accounting policies are disclosed in the notes to our combined consolidated financial statements in “Part IV. Exhibits and Financial Statements.” The following represent certain critical accounting policies that require us to exercise our business judgment or make significant estimates: Investment in Hotel Properties Upon acquisition, we allocate the purchase price of our hotel properties based on the fair value of the acquired land, land improvements, building, furniture, fixtures and equipment and identifiable intangible assets or liabilities. Identifiable intangible assets or liabilities typically arise from contractual arrangements assumed in connection with the transaction, including terms that are above or below market compared to an estimated market agreement at the acquisition date. Any additional amounts are allocated to goodwill as required, based on the remaining purchase price in excess of the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We expense acquisition costs as incurred. All costs related to finding, analyzing and negotiating a transaction are expensed as incurred, whether or not the acquisition is completed. The allocation of the purchase price to elements of our acquired hotel properties is an area that requires judgment and significant estimates. Therefore, the amounts allocated to acquired assets and liabilities could be materially different than if that transaction had occurred on a different date. At times estimates are determined based on limited data for comparable market transactions, such as discount rates used in the market or income valuation approach or the purchase involves land or a ground lease in a niche market. This could materially impact the allocation to identifiable assets and the related amortization over future periods if the value was assigned to another identifiable asset acquired. Direct and indirect costs that are clearly related to the construction and improvements of investment properties are capitalized. Costs incurred for property taxes and insurance and interest costs are capitalized during periods in which activities necessary to get the property ready for its intended use are in progress. The Company also capitalizes project management salaries and benefits and travel expenses as these are costs directly related to the renovations and capital improvements of our hotel portfolio. Our investments in hotel properties are carried at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 30 years for buildings and improvements, and 5 to 15 years for site improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment. Intangible assets arising from contractual arrangements are typically amortized over the remaining life of the contract. Renovations, improvements and/or replacements at the hotel properties that improve or extend the life of the assets are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives, while repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Furniture, fixtures and equipment under capital leases are carried at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Cost capitalization and the estimate of useful lives requires us to make subjective assessments of our properties for the purposes of determining the amount of depreciation expense to reflect each year with respect to the assets. These assessments may impact our results of operations. Assets Held for Sale and Dispositions We will classify a hotel as held for sale when a binding agreement to purchase the property has been signed under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of nonrefundable cash, no significant financing or other contingencies exist, and the sale is expected to close within one year. If these criteria are met, we will suspend depreciation and amortization of the hotel property and an impairment loss (if any), will be recognized if the fair value less costs to sell is lower than the carrying amount of the hotel. We will classify the loss, together with the related operating results, in continuing operations on the statements of operations and comprehensive income unless the sale represents a strategic shift and has, or will have, a major effect on the entity’s results and operations, in which case it will be presented as discontinued operations, and we will classify the assets and related liabilities as held for sale on the balance sheet. The fair value of the assets and liabilities held for sale could change if the sales agreement is amended prior to completing the closing conditions, and at times may lead to impairment or additional impairment that could be material to the financial statements. The Company recognizes gain in full when real estate is sold, provided (a) the profit is determinable, that is, the collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured or the amount that will not be collectible can be estimated, and (b) the earnings process is virtually complete, that is, the seller is not obliged to perform significant activities after the sale to earn the profit. 54 Impairment We review our investments in hotel properties including the related intangible assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the hotel properties may not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that may cause a review include, but are not limited to, when a hotel property experiences a current or projected loss from operations, when it becomes more likely than not that a hotel property will be sold before the end of its useful life, adverse changes in the demand for lodging at the properties due to declining national or local economic conditions and/or new hotel construction in markets where the hotels are located. When such conditions exist, we perform an analysis to determine if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows from operations and the proceeds from the ultimate disposition of a hotel exceed its carrying value. If it is determined that the estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an adjustment to reduce the carrying amount to the related hotel’s estimated fair market value is recorded and an impairment loss recognized. In the evaluation of impairment of our hotel properties, we make many assumptions and estimates including projected cash flows both from operations and eventual disposition, expected useful life and holding period, future required capital expenditures, and fair values, including consideration of capitalization rates, discount rates, and comparable selling prices. The valuation and possible subsequent impairment of investment properties is a significant estimate that can and does change based on our continuous process of analyzing each property and reviewing assumptions about uncertain inherent factors, as well as the economic condition of the property at a particular point in time. The Company tests goodwill for impairment by making a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the specific property’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before application of the two-step goodwill impairment test. The two-step goodwill test is not performed for those assets where it is concluded that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a specific property is greater than its carrying amount. For those specific properties where this is not the case, the two step procedure detailed below is followed in order to determine the amount of goodwill impairment. In the first step, the Company compares the estimated fair value of each property with goodwill to the carrying value of the property’s assets, including goodwill. The fair value is based on estimated future cash flow projections that utilize discount and capitalization rates, which are generally unobservable in the market place (Level 3 inputs), but approximate the inputs the Company believes would be utilized by market participants in assessing fair value. The estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors, including the historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions. If the carrying amount of the property’s assets, including goodwill, exceeds its estimated fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. In this second step, if the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount of goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded in an amount equal to that excess. If we misjudge or estimate incorrectly or if future operating profitability, market or industry factors differ from our expectations, we may record an impairment charge which is inappropriate, fail to record a charge when we should have done so or the amount of such charges may be inaccurate. Derivatives and Hedging Activities In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effects of interest rate changes. The Company limits the risks associated with interest rate changes by following established risk management policies and procedures which may include the use of derivative instruments. The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Company assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged items. Instruments that meet these hedging criteria are formally designated as hedges at the inception of the derivative contract and are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with offsetting changes recorded to other comprehensive income (loss). The Company nets assets and liabilities when the right of offset exists. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of a cash flow hedge are recognized as interest expense. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. Consolidation We evaluate our investments in limited liability companies and partnerships to determine whether such entities may be a variable interest entity (“VIE”). If the entity is a VIE, the determination of whether we are the primary beneficiary must be made. We will consolidate a VIE if we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary, as defined in FASB ASC 810, Consolidation. The equity method of accounting is applied to entities in which we are not the primary beneficiary as defined FASB ASC 810, or the entity is not a VIE and we do not have effective control, but can exercise influence over the entity with respect to its operations and major decisions. 55 On January 1, 2016, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU 2015-02”), which amended the consolidation guidance for VIE’s and general partner’s investments in limited partnerships and modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnership and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities. Upon adoption of ASU 2015-02, the Company concluded there was no change required in the accounting of its two previously identified VIEs in our two investments in real estate entities and therefore will continue to consolidate these VIEs for reporting purposes, as further described in Note 5. However, the Company concluded that the Operating Partnership now meets the criteria as a VIE under ASU 2015-02. The Company’s significant asset is its investment in the Operating Partnership, as described in Note 1, and consequently, substantially all of the Company’s assets and liabilities represent those assets and liabilities of the Operating Partnership. As such, there is no change in the presentation of the consolidated financial statements of the Company upon adoption of ASU 2015-02. Income Taxes The Company has elected to be taxed as, and has operated in a manner that we believe will allow the Company to continue to qualify as, a REIT for federal income tax purposes. So long as the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that is currently distributed to its stockholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, without the benefit of certain relief provisions, the Company will be subject to federal, state and local income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates and will not be eligible to re-elect REIT status during the four years following the failure. Even if the Company continues to qualify for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income, property or net worth and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, the Company cannot operate or manage its hotels. Accordingly, the Company, through its Operating Partnership, leases all of its hotels to subsidiaries of its TRS. The TRS is subject to federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates. Lease revenues at the Operating Partnership subsidiary landlords and lease expense from the TRS lessees are eliminated in consolidation for financial statement purposes. The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized based on consideration of available evidence, including future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax-planning strategies. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company’s analysis in determining the deferred tax asset valuation allowance involves management judgment and assumptions. Management evaluates the realizability of deferred tax assets quarterly by re-assessing the need for a valuation allowance. Income tax expense in the combined consolidated financial statements for the period from January 1, 2015 through February 3, 2015 and for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was calculated on a “carve-out” basis from InvenTrust. Share-Based Compensation The Company has adopted a share-based incentive plan that provides for the grant of stock options, stock awards, restricted stock units, performance units and other equity-based awards. Share-based compensation is measured at the estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant, adjusted for forfeitures, and recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the longest vesting period for each grant for the entire award. The determination of fair value of these awards is subjective and involves significant estimates and assumptions including expected volatility of the Company’s shares, expected dividend yield, expected term and assumptions of whether certain of these awards will achieve parity with other Operating Partnership units or achieve performance thresholds. Share-based compensation is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and capitalized in building and other improvements in the consolidated balance sheets for certain employees that manage property developments, renovations and capital improvements. 56 Results of Operations Overview Our total portfolio RevPAR, which includes the results of hotels that were sold or acquired during the respective periods presented, increased 4.7% to $149.32 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $142.59, for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in our total portfolio RevPAR during 2016 was partially driven by the moderate pricing increase in the overall US lodging industry but was primarily attributable to changes in our portfolio mix. During the second half of 2015, we acquired three high-quality hotels, opened two hotels that we developed and own through two consolidated real estate entities and sold one hotel property. During 2016, we acquired one hotel and completed the disposition of nine hotels with an average RevPAR significantly below the remainder of our portfolio, which also contributed to increases in the overall portfolio metrics. The total portfolio RevPAR for the year ended December 31, 2016 was negatively impacted by the continued declines in our Houston-area hotels attributable to the volatile energy markets which led to weakness in corporate demand and new supply additions in the market. On average our Houston-area hotels had an average decrease in RevPAR of 17.5% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015, which was driven by a 7.7% decrease in ADR and an 800 basis point decline in occupancy. Net income attributable to common stock and unit holders decreased 3.3% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015, primarily attributable to a larger gain on sale of investment properties offset by one-time separation and other start-up related expenses incurred during 2015 as part of our spin-off to a stand-alone publicly traded company. This was also offset by a $10 million provision for asset impairment incurred during 2016. Adjusted EBITDA attributable to common stock and unit holders for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased 1.9% compared to 2015 and Adjusted FFO attributable to common stock and unit holders decreased 1.4% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to 2015, which was primarily due to changes in our portfolio mix. Refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for the definition of these financial measures, a description of how they are useful to investors as key supplemental measures of our operating performance and the reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to net income attributable to common stock and unit holders. As of December 31, 2016, the Company owned 42 lodging properties, 40 of which were wholly owned, with a total of 10,911 rooms. As of December 31, 2015, the Company owned 50 lodging properties, 48 of which were wholly owned, with a total of 12,548 rooms. As of December 31, 2014, the Company owned 48 lodging properties, 46 of which were wholly owned, with 12,636 rooms. The remaining two hotels, for all periods presented, are owned through individual investments in real estate entities in which the Company has a 75% ownership interest in each investment. These two hotels include the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston, which opened on August 27, 2015, and the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, which opened on October 22, 2015. On November 17, 2014, InvenTrust sold the Suburban Select Service Portfolio for an aggregate gross disposition price of $1.1 billion. Prior to the sale transaction, we oversaw the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. This sale reflected a strategic shift pursuant to ASU No. 2014-08 and had a major impact on our consolidated financial statements; therefore, the operations of these 52 hotels are reflected as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. 57 The following represents the disposition details for the properties sold in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 (in thousands, except rooms): Property Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville(1) DoubleTree by Hilton Washington DC(1)(2) Embassy Suites Baltimore North/Hunt Valley(1)(2) Marriott Atlanta Century Center/Emory Area & Hilton Phoenix Suites(1)(2)(3) Hilton St. Louis Downtown at the Arch(1) Hampton Inn & Suites Denver Downtown, Hilton Garden Inn Chicago North Shore/Evanston, and Homewood Suites by Hilton Houston Near the Galleria(1)(3) Total for the year ended December 31, 2016 Hyatt Regency Orange County(1) Total for the year ended December 31, 2015 Crowne Plaza Charleston Airport - Convention Center(1)(2) DoubleTree Suites Atlanta Galleria(1)(2) Suburban Select Service Portfolio - 52 properties(4) Holiday Inn Secaucus Meadowlands(1) Total for the year ended December 31, 2014 Date 02/2016 04/2016 05/2016 06/2016 12/2016 12/2016 10/2015 05/2014 08/2014 11/2014 12/2014 Rooms (unaudited) Gross Sale Price 248 220 223 513 195 488 1,887 656 656 166 154 6,976 161 7,457 $ $ 36,000 65,000 20,000 50,750 21,500 97,000 290,250 137,000 137,000 13,250 12,600 1,071,000 4,600 $ 1,101,450 (1) Included in net income from continuing operations in the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the periods of ownership. (2) As part of the disposition of the hotel, the Company recognized a provision for asset impairment on the statement of operations and comprehensive income in the consolidated financial statements during the respective years ended December 31, 2016 and 2014. (3) The hotels were sold as part of a portfolio sales agreement. (4) Included in net income (loss) from discontinued operations in the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the periods of ownership. The following represents our acquisitions activity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 (in thousands, except rooms): Property Hotel Commonwealth Total purchased in the year ended December 31, 2016 Canary Santa Barbara(1) Hotel Palomar Philadelphia(1) RiverPlace Hotel(1) Total purchased in the year ended December 31, 2015 Location Date Boston, MA 01/2016 Santa Barbara, CA 07/2015 Philadelphia, PA 07/2015 07/2015 Portland, OR Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel Key West Bottling Court Total purchased in the year ended December 31, 2014 Honolulu, HI Key West, FL 02/2014 11/2014 No. of Rooms Purchase Price 245 245 97 230 84 411 645 —(2) 645 $ $ $ $ $ $ 136,000 136,000 80,000 100,000 65,000 245,000 183,000 7,400 190,400 (1) The hotel was acquired as part of a portfolio acquisition. Therefore, the property level purchase price was an allocation of the total purchase price for the portfolio acquired. (2) This is a retail building adjacent to our Hyatt Centric Key West Resort & Spa hotel, a portion of which is used for office space and a portion of which is leased to third party tenants. 58 Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2016 to the year ended December 31, 2015 Operating Information The following table sets forth certain operating information for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015: Year Ended December 31, Number of properties at January 1 Properties acquired or added to portfolio upon completion of construction(1) Properties disposed Number of properties at December 31 Number of rooms at January 1 Rooms in properties acquired or added to portfolio upon completion of construction(1)(2) Rooms in properties disposed Number of rooms at December 31 Portfolio Statistics: Occupancy(1)(3)(4) ADR(1)(3)(4) RevPAR(1)(3)(4) Hotel operating income (in thousands)(5) 2015 Variance 2016 50 1 (9) 42 46 5 (1) 50 12,548 12,636 250 (1,887) 10,911 568 (656) 12,548 8.7% (80.0)% 800.0% (16.0)% (0.7)% (56.0)% 187.7% (13.0)% 75.6% 76.2% (60) bps $197.44 $149.32 $357,823 $187.04 $142.59 $365,902 5.6% 4.7% (2.2)% (1) The results for the year ended December 31, 2015, include the consolidated operating results of the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston that opened on August 27, 2015 and the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook that opened on October 22, 2015. (2) The rooms additions include total number of rooms acquired and total number of rooms put into operations upon the completion of construction or renovation. (3) For hotels acquired during the applicable period, only includes operating statistics since the date of acquisition. For hotels disposed of during the period, operating results and statistics are only included through the date of the respective disposition. (4) Does not include hotel statistics for hotel dispositions classified as discontinued operations. (5) Hotel operating income represents the difference between total revenues and total hotel operating expenses. Revenues Revenues consists of room, food and beverage, and other revenues from our hotels, as follows (in thousands): Revenues: Room revenues Food and beverage revenues Other revenues Total revenues Room revenues Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 Increase / (Decrease) Variance $ $ 653,944 $ 663,224 $ 246,479 49,737 259,036 53,884 (9,280) (12,557) (4,147) (1.4)% (4.8)% (7.7)% 950,160 $ 976,144 $ (25,984) (2.7)% Our portfolio composition has evolved during 2016 compared to 2015, which was primarily due to the acquisition and disposition transactions that we have executed. The Company disposed of ten hotels from October 2015 to December 2016. The disposed hotels were at the lower end of our portfolio with a substantial discount in RevPAR and lower growth expectations compared to the remainder of our portfolio, and required near-term capital expenditures. We also completed the acquisition of four hotels from July 2015 to January 2016, all of which had an average RevPAR at the higher end of our portfolio during 2016. Additionally, in the second half of 2015, we opened two ground-up hotel developments that were in the process of stabilizing during 2016. 59 Room revenues decreased by $9.3 million, or 1.4%, to $653.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $663.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, of which $56.7 million was attributed to the disposition of ten hotels since October 2015, $11.2 million was attributed to our three Houston-area hotels that have been negatively impacted by the volatility in the energy markets and new supply and $0.2 million was attributed to the remainder of our portfolio. These decreases were offset by increases of $48.5 million contributed by the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth in January 2016, the two hotel developments that began operations in the third and fourth quarter of 2015 and the three hotels acquired in July 2015. An additional net increase of $10.3 million was contributed by several of our California hotels that were positively impacted by increased business levels resulting from their recent renovations, which was partially offset by renovation disruption at the Marriott Napa Valley Hotel & Spa during the first half of this year. Food and beverage revenues Food and beverage revenues decreased by $12.6 million, or 4.8%, to $246.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $259.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, of which $22.1 million was attributed to the disposition of ten hotels since October 2015 and $4.5 million attributed to our three Houston-area hotels. The remainder of the portfolio was down $5.9 million compared to 2015, which was attributed to renovation disruption in the first half of 2016 at Marriott Napa Valley Hotel & Spa, the City of Santa Clara imposed moratorium on selling convention center space during 2015, which led to soft banquet and catering demand, and less citywide compression in certain markets, including New Orleans and Chicago. These decreases were offset by increases of $19.9 million contributed by the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth in January 2016, the two hotel developments that began operations in the third and fourth quarter of 2015 and the three hotels acquired in July 2015. Other revenues Other revenues decreased by $4.1 million, or 7.7%, to $49.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $53.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, of which $3.1 million of the decrease was attributable to the disposition of ten hotels since October 2015, $2.0 million was attributed to our Houston-area hotels and an overall net decrease of $2.0 million attributed to the remainder of our portfolio. These decreases were offset by an increase of $3.0 million contributed by the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth in January 2016, the two hotel developments that began operations in the third and fourth quarter of 2015 and the three hotels acquired in July 2015. Hotel Operating Expenses Hotel operating expenses consist of the following (in thousands): Hotel operating expenses: Room expenses Food and beverage expenses Other direct expenses Other indirect expenses Management and franchise fees Total hotel operating expenses Total hotel operating expenses Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 Increase / (Decrease) Variance $ 146,050 $ 148,492 $ 161,699 12,848 224,135 47,605 167,840 17,984 226,108 49,818 (2,442) (6,141) (5,136) (1,973) (2,213) $ 592,337 $ 610,242 $ (17,905) (1.6)% (3.7)% (28.6)% (0.9)% (4.4)% (2.9)% Total hotel operating expenses decreased $17.9 million, or 2.9%, to $592.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $610.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, of which $8.7 million was attributable to renovation disruption at the Marriott Napa Valley Hotel & Spa in the first half of this year and the Houston-area hotels as well as an overall net decrease of $3.0 million attributable to the remainder of our portfolio. Additional decreases of $55.2 million were attributed to the disposition of ten hotels since October 2015. These decreases were offset by increases of $45.1 million primarily attributable to the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth in January 2016, the two hotel developments that began operations in the third and fourth quarter of 2015 and the three hotels acquired in July 2015. An additional $3.9 million of increases was attributable to several of our California hotels that were positively impacted by increased business levels resulting from their recent renovations, particularly as compared to the first half of 2015 when business was impacted by the disruption created by the renovations. 60 Corporate and Other Expenses Corporate and other expenses consist of the following (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 Increase / (Decrease) Variance Depreciation and amortization $ 152,418 $ 148,009 $ Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance Ground lease expense General and administrative expenses Acquisition transaction costs Pre-opening expenses Provision for asset impairment Separation and other start-up related expenses 46,248 5,447 32,018 154 — 10,035 — 49,717 5,204 25,556 5,046 1,411 — 26,887 4,409 (3,469) 243 6,462 3.0 % (7.0)% 4.7 % 25.3 % (4,892) (96.9)% (1,411) (100.0)% 10,035 100.0% (26,887) (100.0)% Total corporate and other expenses $ 246,320 $ 261,830 $ (15,510) (5.9)% Depreciation and amortization Depreciation and amortization expense increased $4.4 million, or 3.0%, to $152.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $148.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, of which $13.8 million of the increase was attributable to the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth in January 2016, the two hotel developments that began operations in the third and fourth quarter of 2015 and the three hotels acquired in July 2015. The remaining $2.1 million increase is the result of capital expenditures to improve our properties. These increases were offset by decreases of $11.5 million attributed to the sale of ten hotels since October 2015. Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance expense decreased $3.5 million, or 7.0%, to $46.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $49.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, of which $3.9 million was attributable to the sale of ten hotels since October 2015 offset by $3.1 million in increases from the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth in January 2016, the two hotel developments that began operations in the third and fourth quarter of 2015, and the three hotels acquired in July 2015. The remaining decrease of $2.7 million was primarily attributable to a decrease in real estate taxes as a result of tax appeals and refunds and from property and casualty insurance for the remainder of our hotel portfolio. Ground lease expense Ground lease expense increased $0.2 million, or 4.7%, to $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily attributable to the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth, which is subject to a ground lease, in January 2016, offset by the disposition of two hotels with ground leases later in 2016. General and administrative expenses General and administrative expenses increased $6.5 million, or 25.3%, to $32.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $25.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, of which $3.1 million of the increase was primarily attributable to non-recurring management transition and severance costs incurred during the first quarter of 2016. The remaining increase was primarily due to salaries, stock compensation and employment related expenses as well as costs related to the corporate office space leased in 2016. Acquisition transaction costs Acquisition transaction costs were $0.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. Typically, acquisition transaction costs consist of legal fees, other professional fees, transfer taxes and other direct costs associated with our pursuit of hotel investments. As a result, these costs vary with our level of ongoing acquisition activity. The primary decrease during the year ended December 31, 2016 was attributable to the acquisition of three hotels in 2015 compared to one hotel in 2016. Pre-opening expense Pre-opening expenses were $1.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2015, which related to opening costs for our two development projects, the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, which opened to the public in August and October 2015, respectively. 61 Provision for asset impairment During the year ended December 31, 2016, a provision for asset impairment of $10.0 million was recorded on three hotels which were identified to have a reduction in their expected hold period when they met the held for sale criteria, and were written down to their estimated fair value, less costs to sell. The hotels were subsequently sold in April, May and June 2016, respectively. There were no asset impairments recorded for the year ended December 31, 2015. Separation and other start-up related expenses The $26.9 million in separation and other start-up related expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 related to fees paid to unrelated third parties attributable to one-time costs incurred related to our spin-off from InvenTrust, the listing of our Common Stock on the NYSE, costs related to start-up costs incurred while transitioning to a stand-alone, publicly-traded company and costs related to the repurchase of shares of our Common Stock in a modified “Dutch Auction” self-tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) that commenced in conjunction with the listing of the Company’s Common Stock on the NYSE. Results of Non-Operating Income and Expenses Non-operating income and expenses consist of the following (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 Increase / (Decrease) Variance Non-operating income and expenses: Gain on sale of investment properties Other income Interest expense Loss on extinguishment of debt Income tax expense Net income (loss) from discontinued operations Gain on sale of investment properties $ 30,195 $ 43,015 $ (12,820) 3,377 (48,113) (5,155) (5,077) — 4,916 (50,816) (5,761) (6,295) (489) (1,539) 2,703 606 1,218 (29.8)% (31.3)% 5.3 % 10.5 % 19.3 % 489 100.0 % The gain on sale of investment properties for the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily related to the sale of one hotel in February, one hotel sold in June 2016, and four hotels sold in the fourth quarter of 2016. The gain for the year ended December 31, 2015 was from the sale of one hotel in October 2015. Other income Other income decreased $1.5 million, or 31.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2016, which was primarily attributable to the $4.8 million involuntary loss and business interruption insurance recoveries for the August 2014 Napa earthquake that was received in 2015, management termination fees net of guaranty income of $0.2 million and the write-off of intangibles assets of $0.3 million. The 2015 non-recurring recovery income and expenses were offset by $1.9 million received during the year ended December 31, 2016 for settlement of contested hotel expenses and $0.9 million for a favorable settlement of a real estate tax appeal related to a hotel that was sold prior to our spin-off. Interest expense Interest expense decreased $2.7 million, or 5.3%, to $48.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $50.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, which was attributable to repayments of debt during the year resulting in a lower weighted average interest rate of 3.24% at December 31, 2016 compared to 3.51% at December 31, 2015. Loss on extinguishment of debt Loss on extinguishment of debt decreased by $0.6 million, or 10.5%, to $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company elected the early repayment option under the terms of two loans and incurred termination penalties and wrote-off the remaining unamortized loan costs for the repayment of seven loans in 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the loss on extinguishment of debt was primarily the result of the prepayment penalties and other costs associated with the repayment of seven mortgage loans. 62 Income tax expense Income tax expense decreased $1.2 million, or 19.3%, to $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $6.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. This decrease was primarily attributable to the $1.9 million income tax expense associated with transferring a hotel between entities in connection with electing REIT status offset by the utilization of federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carry forwards in 2015. These NOLs were fully utilized during 2015 and were no longer available to offset current taxable income in 2016. Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2015 to the year ended December 31, 2014 Operating information Number of properties at January 1 Properties acquired Properties disposed Number of properties at December 31 Number of rooms at January 1 Rooms in properties acquired Rooms in properties disposed Number of rooms at December 31 Portfolio Statistics: Occupancy (1)(2) Average Daily Rate (ADR) (1)(2) Revenue Per Available Room (RevPAR) (1)(2) Hotel operating income (in thousands) (3) Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 Variance 46 5 (1) 50 12,636 568 (656) 12,548 48 1 (3) 46 12,472 645 (481) 12,636 (4.2)% 400.0% (66.7)% 8.7% 1.3% (11.9)% 36.4% (0.7)% 76.2% 76.2% $187.04 $142.59 $176.80 $134.73 $365,902 $333,363 —% 5.8% 5.8% 9.8% (1) For hotels acquired during the applicable period, only includes operating statistics since the date of acquisition. For hotels disposed of during the period, operating results and statistics are only included through the date of the respective disposition. Reflects a January 1 to December 31 fiscal calendar year for all hotels, including those operated by Marriott. (2) Does not include hotel statistics for hotel dispositions classified as discontinued operations. (3) Hotel operating income represents the difference between total revenues and total hotel operating expenses. Revenues Revenues consists of room, food and beverage, and other departmental revenues from our hotels, as follows (in thousands): Revenues: Room revenues Food and beverage revenues Other revenues Total revenues Room revenues Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 Increase/ (Decrease) Variance $663,224 $631,901 $31,323 259,036 235,066 53,884 59,699 23,970 (5,815) $976,144 $926,666 $49,478 5.0 % 10.2 % (9.7)% 5.3 % Room revenues increased by $31.3 million, or 5.0%, to $663.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $631.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, of which $2.9 million was contributed by Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel acquired in February 2014, $16.3 million was contributed by the three hotels acquired in July 2015, $12.4 million was contributed 63 by five of our hotel properties in California driven by completed renovations and higher revenue in the fourth quarter compared to prior year that was negatively impacted by the August 2014 Napa earthquake and $2.1 million was contributed by the two hotel developments that began operations in the third and fourth quarter of 2015. A net increase of $21.4 million was contributed by our remaining 35 comparable hotels that were owned during the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2014, attributable to a 4.6% improvement in RevPAR driven by a 3.9% increase in ADR. These increases were offset by a reduction in revenue of $15.4 million related to three properties disposed of in 2014 and one property disposed of in October 2015 and $4.3 million attributed to four of our hotel properties in the Houston market that were negatively impacted by the continued volatility of the energy market during the year. Our transition to the Eleventh Revised Edition of USALI in the first quarter of 2015 resulted in $4.1 million of resort fees being recorded in other revenues rather than room revenues during the year ended December 31, 2014, of which $3.3 million was attributable to the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel. Food and beverage revenues Food and beverage revenues increased by $24.0 million, or 10.2%, to $259.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $235.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, of which $8.1 million of the increase was attributable to reclassifications of revenues historically included in other revenues, $7.3 million was attributable to the three hotels acquired in July 2015, $2.5 million was attributed by the two hotel developments that began operations in the third and fourth quarter of 2015, and net increases of $10.9 million were attributable to our remaining hotel portfolio due to higher banquet food and beverage and ancillary revenues, as well as, continued strong performance in other food and beverage outlets. These increases for the year ended December 31, 2015, were offset by decreases of $4.8 million related to three properties disposed of in 2014 and one hotel disposed of in October 2015. Other revenues Other revenues decreased by $5.8 million, or 9.7%, to $53.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $59.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, of which $8.1 million was attributed to the reclassifications of revenues historically included in other revenues to food and beverage revenue, $1.1 million due to a reduction in guarantee income recorded from the manager of one hotel, and a net decrease of $6.6 million related to our remaining portfolio, the three properties disposed of in 2014 and one hotel property disposed of in October 2015. These decreases were offset by increases of $4.1 million of resort fees that were previously included in room revenues for the year ended December 31, 2014 as a result of the transition to the Eleventh Revised Edition of USALI in the first quarter of 2015, which were primarily contributed by the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel acquired in February 2014 and additional increases of $5.9 million contributed by the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel and the three hotels acquired in July 2015. Hotel Operating Expenses Hotel operating expenses consist of the following (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 Increase/ (Decrease) Variance Hotel operating expenses: Room expenses Food and beverage expenses Other direct expenses Other indirect expenses Management fees $ 148,492 $ 140,128 $ 167,840 17,984 226,108 49,818 158,243 28,556 214,272 52,104 Total hotel operating expenses $ 610,242 $ 593,303 $ 8,364 9,597 6.0 % 6.1 % (10,572) (37.0)% 11,836 (2,286) 16,939 5.5 % (4.4)% 2.9 % Hotel operating expenses Total hotel operating expenses increased $16.9 million, or 2.9%, to $610.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $593.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, of which $4.4 million of the increase was contributed by the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel acquired in February 2014, $14.6 million was contributed by the three hotels acquired in July 2015 and a net increase of $14.6 million was contributed by our remaining properties. These increases were offset by a $16.7 million decrease in total hotel operating expenses attributable to the three hotels sold in 2014 and one hotel sold in October 2015. 64 Corporate and Other Expenses Corporate and other expenses consist of the following (in thousands): Depreciation and amortization Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance Ground lease expense General and administrative expenses Business management fees Acquisition transaction costs Pre-opening expenses Provision for asset impairment Separation and other start-up related expenses Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 $ 148,009 $ 141,807 $ 49,717 5,204 25,556 — 5,046 1,411 — 26,887 44,625 5,541 38,895 1,474 1,192 — 5,378 — Total corporate and other expenses $ 261,830 $ 238,912 $ Increase/ (Decrease) Variance 6,202 5,092 (337) 4.4 % 11.4 % (6.1)% (13,339) (34.3)% (1,474) (100.0)% 3,854 1,411 323.3 % 100.0 % (5,378) (100.0)% 26,887 22,918 100.0 % 9.6 % Depreciation and amortization Depreciation and amortization expense increased $6.2 million, or 4.4%, to $148.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $141.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, of which $5.8 million of the increase was contributed by the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel acquired in February 2014 and the three hotels acquired in July 2015. The remaining $3.8 million increase is the result of capital expenditures to improve our properties offset by decreases of $3.4 million for three properties disposed of in 2014 and one hotel disposed of in October 2015. Real estate taxes, personal property taxes, and insurance Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance expense increased $5.1 million, or 11.4%, to $49.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $44.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. Real estate taxes and personal property taxes increased across the portfolio due to increased assessed property values or tax rates at certain properties, partially offset by refunds from prior year real estate tax appeals. Ground lease expense Ground lease expense decreased $0.3 million, or 6.1%, to $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, comprised primarily of an increase of $0.4 million attributable to the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel acquired in February 2014 offset by decreases of $0.9 million for a property sold in 2014. General and administrative expenses General and administrative expenses decreased $13.3 million, or 34.3%, to $25.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $38.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. This was due to InvenTrust allocations for $16.2 million for year ended December 31, 2014, offset by an increase in bonus expense, non-cash stock compensation to our Board of Directors, executive officers and certain members of management, and net increases in other operating costs related to salaries and professional fees during the year ended December 31, 2015. General and administrative for the year ended December 31, 2015, was not fully comparable to the year ended December 31, 2014 for these reasons. Additionally, the year ended December 31, 2014 may have included non-recurring costs and other allocations related to our spin-off from our former parent company. Business management fee Business management fee expense decreased $1.5 million to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. On March 12, 2014, InvenTrust executed the Self-Management Transactions. In connection with the Self-Management Transactions, InvenTrust agreed with the Business Manager to terminate the management agreement with the Business Manager, hire all of the Business Manager’s employees and acquire the assets or rights necessary to conduct the functions previously performed for InvenTrust by the Business Manager. The Self-Management Transactions resulted in a final business management fee incurred in January 2014. 65 Acquisition transaction costs Acquisition transaction costs were $5.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily related to the three hotels acquired in July 2015. Typically, acquisition transaction costs consist of legal fees, other professional fees, transfer taxes and other direct costs associated with our pursuit of hotel investments. As a result, these costs vary with our level of ongoing acquisition activity. Pre-opening expense Pre-opening expenses were $1.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2015, which related to opening costs for our two development projects, the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, which opened to the public in August and October 2015, respectively. Provision for asset impairment During the year ended December 31, 2014, a provision for asset impairment of $5.4 million was recorded on two hotels which were identified to have a reduction in their expected holding period and were written down to their estimated fair market values. These hotels were subsequently sold in August and December 2014. There were no asset impairments recorded for the year ended December 31, 2015. Separation and other start-up related expenses The $26.9 million in separation and other start-up related expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015, relates to fees paid to unrelated third parties attributable to one-time costs incurred related to our spin-off from InvenTrust, the listing of our common stock on the NYSE, costs related to the Tender Offer and other start-up costs incurred while transitioning to a stand-alone, publicly-traded company. Results of Non-Operating Income and Expenses Hotel non-operating income and expenses consist of the following (in thousands): Gain on sale of investment properties $ 43,015 $ Other income Interest expense Loss on extinguishment of debt Equity in losses and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net Income tax expense Net income (loss) from discontinued operations Gain on sale of investment properties 4,916 (50,816) (5,761) — (6,295) (489) Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 Increase/ (Decrease) Variance $ 42,322 6,107.1% 4,592 6,611 1,417.3% 11.5% 693 324 (57,427) (1,713) (4,048) (236.3)% 4,216 (5,865) (4,216) (100.0)% 430 (7.3)% 75,120 (75,609) (100.7)% Gain on sale of investment properties for the year ended December 31, 2014 was related to the sale of three hotels in 2014 that were included in continuing operations. The gain on sale for the year ended December 31, 2015 related to the sale of the Hyatt Regency Orange County in October 2015. Other income Other income increased $4.6 million, or 1,417.3%, to $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, which was primarily attributable to the involuntary loss and business interruption insurance recovery income of $3.9 million, which is net of hotel related expenses. Interest expense Interest expense decreased $6.6 million, or 11.5%, to $50.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $57.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. This was primarily the result of lower average debt balances in 2015 due to repayments during the year ended December 31, 2015, and the Company was no longer allocated the $96.0 million unsecured credit facility from InvenTrust. 66 Loss on extinguishment of debt Loss on extinguishment of debt increased by $4.0 million, or 236.3%, to $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. This was primarily the result of the prepayment penalties and other costs associated with the repayment of seven mortgage loans during the year ended December 31, 2015. Equity in losses and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net Equity in losses and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net decreased $4.2 million to $0, for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company bought out its partner’s interest in an unconsolidated entity that owned one hotel property, and began consolidating the operating results of the hotel resulting in a gain of $4.5 million upon consolidation of the related assets and liabilities, which was offset by $0.3 million representing the Company’s share of equity in losses prior to the buyout of the remaining partner’s interest. The respective hotel property was later sold as part of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. We had no investments in unconsolidated entities as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. Income tax expense Income tax expense increased $0.4 million, or 7.3%, to $6.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $5.9 million allocated from InvenTrust for the year ended December 31, 2014, which includes taxes on a taxable gain of $1.9 million on the transfer of a hotel to a more optimal ownership structure in connection with the Company’s intention to elect to be taxed as a REIT. Net income (loss) from discontinued operations Net income (loss) from discontinued operations decreased $75.6 million, or 100.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2014, there were 52 properties reflected in discontinued operations. Effective January 1, 2014, we elected to early adopt ASU 2014-08. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift that had (or will have) a major effect on the entity’s results and operations would qualify as discontinued operations. On September 17, 2014, InvenTrust entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement to sell the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, which was sold on November 17, 2014. Prior to the sale transaction, we oversaw the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. We believe this sale represented a strategic shift away from suburban select service hotels that had a major effect on our results and operations, and qualified as discontinued operations under ASU No. 2014-08. The operations of these hotels are reflected as discontinued operations on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. Non-GAAP Financial Measures We consider the following non-GAAP financial measures useful to investors as key supplemental measures of our operating performance: EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO and Adjusted FFO. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered along with, but not as alternatives to, net income or loss, operating profit, cash from operations, or any other operating performance measure as prescribed per GAAP. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA EBITDA is a commonly used measure of performance in many industries and is defined as net income or loss (calculated in accordance with GAAP) excluding interest expense, provision for income taxes (including income taxes applicable to sale of assets) and depreciation and amortization. We consider EBITDA useful to an investor regarding our results of operations, in evaluating and facilitating comparisons of our operating performance between periods and between REITs by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense) and asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) from our operating results, even though EBITDA does not represent an amount that accrues directly to common stockholders. In addition, EBITDA is used as one measure in determining the value of hotel acquisitions and dispositions and along with FFO and Adjusted FFO, it is used by management in the annual budget process for compensation programs. We present EBITDA attributable to common stock and unit holders, which includes our Operating Partnership units because our Operating Partnership units may be redeemed for common stock. We believe it is meaningful for the investor to understand EBITDA attributable to all common stock and Operating Partnership units. 67 We further adjust EBITDA for certain additional items such as hotel property acquisitions and pursuit costs, amortization of share-based compensation, equity investment adjustments, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, impairment of real estate assets, operating results from properties sold and other items we believe do not represent recurring operations and are not indicative of the performance of our underlying hotel property entities. We believe Adjusted EBITDA provides investors with another performance measure in evaluating and facilitating comparison of operating performance between periods and between REITs that report similar measures. FFO and Adjusted FFO We calculate FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), which defines FFO as net income or loss (calculated in accordance with GAAP), excluding real estate-related depreciation, amortization and impairments, gains (losses) from sales of real estate, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, similar adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and consolidated variable interest entities, and items classified by GAAP as extraordinary. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, most industry investors consider presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. We believe that the presentation of FFO provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our operating performance by excluding the effect of real estate depreciation and amortization, gains (losses) from sales for real estate, impairments of real estate assets, extraordinary items and the portion of these items related to unconsolidated entities, all of which are based on historical cost accounting and which may be of lesser significance in evaluating current performance. We believe that the presentation of FFO can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between REITs, even though FFO does not represent an amount that accrues directly to common stockholders. Our calculation of FFO may not be comparable to measures calculated by other companies who do not use the NAREIT definition of FFO or do not calculate FFO per diluted share in accordance with NAREIT guidance. Additionally, FFO may not be helpful when comparing us to non-REITs. We present FFO attributable to common stock and unit holders, which includes our Operating Partnership units because our Operating Partnership units may be redeemed for common stock. We believe it is meaningful for the investor to understand FFO attributable to all common stock and Operating Partnership units. We further adjust FFO for certain additional items that are not in NAREIT’s definition of FFO such as hotel property acquisition and pursuit costs, amortization of debt origination costs and share-based compensation, operating results from properties that are sold and other items we believe do not represent recurring operations. We believe that Adjusted FFO provides investors with useful supplemental information that may facilitate comparisons of ongoing operating performance between periods and between REITs that make similar adjustments to FFO and is beneficial to investors’ complete understanding of our operating performance. 68 The following is a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA attributable to common stock and unit holders for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 2016 Net income Adjustments: $ 86,730 $ 88,642 $ 109,799 Interest expense Interest expense from unconsolidated entity Interest expense from discontinued operations(1) Income tax expense Income tax expense related to discontinued operations(1) Depreciation and amortization related to investment properties Depreciation and amortization related to investment in unconsolidated entity Depreciation and amortization of discontinued operations(1) Non-controlling interests in consolidated real estate entities Adjustments related to non-controlling interests in consolidated real estate entities EBITDA attributable to common stock and unit holders Reconciliation to Adjusted EBITDA Impairment of investment properties Gain on sale of investment property Gain on sale of investment property related to discontinued operations(1) Loss on extinguishment of debt Loss on extinguishment of debt related to discontinued operations(1) Gain on consolidation of investment in unconsolidated entity Acquisition transaction costs Amortization of share-based compensation expense Amortization of above and below market ground leases and straight-line rent expense Pre-opening expenses(2) Adjustments related to non-controlling interests pre-opening expense(2) Management termination fees net of guaranty income(3) Business interruption insurance recoveries, net(4) EBITDA adjustment for hotels sold prior to spin-off(5) Management transition and severance expenses Other non-recurring expenses(6) Adjusted EBITDA attributable to common stock and unit holders(7) 48,113 — — 5,077 — 152,274 — — 268 50,816 — — 6,295 — 148,009 — — 567 (1,259) 291,203 $ (270) 294,059 $ $ 10,035 (30,195) — 5,155 — — 154 8,968 955 — — — — (938) 1,991 — 287,328 $ — (43,015) — 5,761 — — 5,046 6,102 380 1,411 (353) 212 (3,884) 404 — 26,887 293,010 $ $ 57,427 31 28,299 5,865 4,566 141,807 100 35,864 — — 383,758 5,378 (693) (135,692) 1,713 65,391 (4,509) 1,192 — 265 — — — — (75,455) — — 241,348 (1) On November 17, 2014, InvenTrust sold the Suburban Select Service Portfolio for an aggregate gross disposition price of $1.1 billion. Prior to the sale transaction, the Company oversaw the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. This sale reflected a strategic shift and had a major impact on our combined consolidated financial statements; therefore, the operations of these 52 hotels are reflected as discontinued operations on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. (2) For the year ended December 31, 2015, the pre-opening expenses related to the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, which opened in August and October 2015, respectively. (3) For the year ended December 31, 2015, we terminated management agreements for four properties and entered into new management contracts with a new third-party hotel operator. In connection with the terminations, we paid termination fees of $0.7 million, which was offset by $0.5 million in income from the write off of deferred guaranty payments that were previously received from certain of the managers and were being recognized over the term of the old management contracts. (4) The business interruption insurance recovery for 2014 received during the year ended December 31, 2015 was $3.9 million, which is net of $1.8 million of hotel related expenses attributable to those hotels impacted by the August 2014 Napa Earthquake. (5) The adjustment excludes the results of hotels disposed of in 2014 prior to the Company’s separation from its former parent, which includes the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, the Crowne Plaza Charleston Airport - Convention Center, the DoubleTree Suites Atlanta Galleria, and the Holiday Inn Secaucus 69 Meadowlands. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company received property tax refunds for the Holiday Inn Secaucus Meadowlands that resulted from appeals that had been in process at the time of our spin-off. (6) For the year ended December 31, 2015, other non-recurring expenses include one-time costs related to the listing of our common stock on the NYSE, such as legal and other professional fees, costs related to the Tender Offer described in Note 12 in the combined consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and other start-up costs incurred while transitioning to a stand-alone, publicly-traded company. The year ended December 31, 2014 included costs related to our separation from InvenTrust and costs related to the preparation of the listing of our common stock on the NYSE. (7) Net debt to Adjusted EBITDA is defined as (i) the total principal balance of debt as of December 31, 2016, which is $1.1 billion per Note 8 of the combined consolidated financial statements included in “Part IV - Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statements,” (ii) less, cash and cash equivalents of $216.1 million as of December 31, 2016, (iii) divided by Adjusted EBITDA attributable to common stock and unit holders of $287.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, which equals 3.1x. The following is a reconciliation of our GAAP net income to FFO and Adjusted FFO for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 2016 Net income Adjustments: Depreciation and amortization related to investment properties Depreciation and amortization related to investment in unconsolidated entity Depreciation and amortization of discontinued operations(1) Impairment of investment property Gain on sale of investment property Gain on sale of investment property related to discontinued operations(1) Gain on consolidation of investment in unconsolidated entity Non-controlling interests in consolidated real estate entities Adjustments related to non-controlling interests in consolidated real estate entities FFO attributable to the Company Distribution to preferred shareholders FFO attributable to common stock and unit holders Reconciliation to Adjusted FFO Loss on extinguishment of debt Loss on extinguishment of debt related to discontinued operations(1) Acquisition transaction costs Loan related costs(2) Adjustment related to non-controlling interests loan related costs Amortization of share-based compensation expense Amortization of above and below market ground leases and straight-line rent expense Pre-opening expenses Adjustments related to non-controlling interests pre-opening expense(3) Management termination fees net of guaranty income(4) Income tax related to restructuring(5) Business interruption proceeds net of hotel related expenses(6) FFO adjustment for hotels sold prior to spin-off(7) Management transition and severance expenses Other non-recurring expenses(8) $ 86,730 $ 88,642 $ 109,799 152,274 — — 10,035 (30,195) — — 268 148,009 — — — (43,015) — — 567 141,807 100 35,864 5,378 (693) (135,692) (4,509) — (897) 218,215 $ — (197) 194,006 $ (12) — 152,054 — 218,215 $ 193,994 $ 152,054 $ $ 5,155 — 154 3,767 (15) 8,968 955 — — — — — (938) 1,991 — 5,761 — 5,046 3,775 (3) 6,102 380 1,411 (353) 212 1,900 (3,884) 404 — 26,887 1,713 65,391 1,192 4,462 — — 265 — — — — — (42,345) — — Adjusted FFO attributable to common stock and unit holders $ 238,252 $ 241,632 $ 182,732 (1) On November 17, 2014, InvenTrust sold the Suburban Select Service Portfolio for an aggregate gross disposition price of $1.1 billion. Prior to the sale transaction, the Company oversaw the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. This sale reflected a strategic shift and had a major impact on our combined consolidated financial statements; therefore, the operations of these 52 hotels are reflected as discontinued operations on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. 70 (2) Loan related costs included amortization of debt discounts, premiums and deferred loan origination costs. (3) For the year ended December 31, 2015, the pre-opening expenses related to the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, which opened in August and October 2015, respectively. (4) For the year ended December 31, 2015, we terminated management agreements for four properties and entered into new management contracts with a new third-party hotel operator. In connection with the terminations, we paid termination fees of $0.7 million, which was offset by $0.5 million in income from the write off of deferred guaranty payments that were previously received from certain of the managers and were being recognized over the term of the old management contracts. (5) For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recognized income tax expense of $6.3 million, of which $1.9 million related to a gain on the transfer of a hotel between legal entities resulting in a more optimal structure in connection with the Company’s intention to elect to be taxed as a REIT. (6) The business interruption insurance recovery for 2014 received during the year ended December 31, 2015 was $3.9 million, which is net of $1.8 million of hotel related expenses attributable to those hotels impacted by the August 2014 Napa Earthquake. (7) The adjustment excludes the results of hotels disposed of in 2014 prior to the Company’s separation from its former parent, which includes the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, the Crowne Plaza Charleston Airport - Convention Center, the DoubleTree Suites Atlanta Galleria, and the Holiday Inn Secaucus Meadowlands. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company received property tax refunds for the Holiday Inn Secaucus Meadowlands that resulted from appeals that had been in process at the time of our spin-off. (8) For the year ended December 31, 2015, other non-recurring expenses include one-time costs related to the listing of our common stock on the NYSE, such as legal and other professional fees, costs related to the Tender Offer described in Note 12 in the combined consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and other start-up costs incurred while transitioning to a stand-alone, publicly-traded company. The year ended December 31, 2014 included costs related to our separation from InvenTrust and costs related to the preparation of the listing of our common stock on the NYSE. Use and Limitations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO, and Adjusted FFO do not represent cash generated from operating activities under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or loss, operating profit, cash flows from operations or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP. Although we present and use EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO and Adjusted FFO because we believe they are useful to investors in evaluating and facilitating comparisons of our operating performance between periods and between REITs that report similar measures, the use of these non-GAAP measures has certain limitations as analytical tools. These non-GAAP financial measures are not measures of our liquidity, nor are they indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to fund capital expenditures, contractual commitments, working capital, service debt or make cash distributions. These measurements do not reflect cash expenditures for long-term assets and other items that we have incurred and will incur. These non-GAAP financial measures may include funds that may not be available for management’s discretionary use due to functional requirements to conserve funds for capital expenditures, property acquisitions, and other commitments and uncertainties. These non-GAAP financial measures as presented may not be comparable to non-GAAP financial measures as calculated by other real estate companies. We compensate for these limitations by separately considering the impact of these excluded items to the extent they are material to operating decisions or assessments of our operating performance. Our reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP financial measures, and our combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, include interest expense, and other excluded items, all of which should be considered when evaluating our performance, as well as the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect additional ways of viewing our operations that we believe, when viewed with our GAAP results and the reconciliations to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business than could be obtained absent this disclosure. We strongly encourage investors to review our financial information in its entirety and not to rely on a single financial measure. Liquidity and Capital Resources We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements from cash on hand, cash flows from operations, borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility and the ability to refinance or extend our maturing debt as or before it comes due. The objectives of our cash management policy are to maintain the availability of liquidity and minimize operational costs. Further, we have an investment policy that is focused on the preservation of capital and maximizing the return on new and existing investments. On a long term basis, our objectives are to maximize revenue and profits generated by our existing properties and acquired hotels, to further enhance the value of our portfolio and produce an attractive current yield, as well as, to generate sustainable and predictable cash flow from our operations to distribute to our stockholders. To the extent we are able to successfully improve the performance of our portfolio, we believe this will result in increased operating cash flows. Additionally, we may meet our long- term liquidity requirements through additional borrowings, the issuance of equity and debt securities, and/or proceeds from the sales of hotels. 71 We may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase additional amounts of our outstanding equity through cash purchases and/or exchanges for other securities in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material. In December 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program pursuant to which the Board authorized us to purchase up to $100 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock, par value $0.01, per share, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans (the “Repurchase Program”). The Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date. The Company is not obligated to repurchase any dollar amount or any number of shares of common stock, and repurchases may be suspended or discontinued at any time. In November 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $75 million of the Company’s outstanding common shares. This repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time, and does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of shares. For the fourth quarter and the year ended December 31, 2016, 500,715 and 4,966,763 shares had been repurchased under the Repurchase Program, at a weighted average price of $15.41 and $14.89, respectively, per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $74.0 million. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $101.0 million remaining under its share repurchase authorization. As of December 31, 2016, we had $216.1 million of consolidated cash and cash equivalents and $71.0 million of restricted cash and escrows. The restricted cash as of December 31, 2016 primarily consists of $58.6 million related to lodging furniture, fixtures and equipment reserves as required per the terms of our management and franchise agreements, cash held in restricted escrows of $3.6 million for real estate taxes and insurance escrows, $5.5 million in disposition related escrows, and $3.3 million capital spending reserves. Credit facility Effective February 3, 2015, we entered into a $400 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks. The revolving credit facility includes an uncommitted accordion feature which, subject to certain conditions, allows us to increase the aggregate availability by up to an additional $350 million. The initial maturity of the revolving credit facility is February 2019, with a one-year extension option. As of December 31, 2016, we did not have any outstanding balance under the revolving credit facility. Interest is paid on the periodic advances under the unsecured revolving credit facility at varying rates, based upon either LIBOR or the alternate base rate, plus an additional margin amount. The interest rate depends upon our leverage ratio pursuant to the provisions of the credit facility agreement. Our credit facility requires an unused commitment fee of 0.30% on the unused portion of the available borrowing amount, which totaled approximately $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The facility also contains customary covenants and restrictions for similar type facilities and, as of December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with these requirements. Unsecured Term Loans and Hotel Mortgages In October 2015, the Company executed a $175 million unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable rate, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in February 2021. Simultaneously with the closing of the $175 million unsecured term loan, the Company entered into swap agreements to fix LIBOR at 1.29% for the entire term of the loan. A portion of the proceeds from the $175 million unsecured term loan was used to pay off the outstanding balance on the unsecured revolving credit facility and the remaining proceeds were used to pay off one property level mortgage with a principal balance of $53 million. Additionally, in October 2015, the Company executed a $125 million unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable rate, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in October 2022. In December 2015, the Company entered into swap agreements to fix LIBOR at 1.83% for the entire term of the loan. The $125 million unsecured term loan was funded in January 2016 in connection with the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth. Additionally, in January 2016, the Company obtained a $60 million mortgage loan for the Hotel Palomar Philadelphia with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 260 basis points and maturing in January 2023. Simultaneously with the closing of the mortgage, the Company entered into an interest rate swap to fix the interest rate at 4.14% for the remaining term of the loan. In February 2016, we refinanced the Grand Bohemian Hotel Orlando mortgage loan with a new loan with a fixed interest rate of 4.53% and a March 2026 maturity. Additional proceeds of approximately $11 million were received under the refinanced terms of the mortgage, which increased the principal of the loan from approximately $49 million to $60 million. 72 In June 2016, the Company exercised its prepayment option on the Courtyard Pittsburgh Downtown mortgage loan and repaid the outstanding balance of $22.3 million. In August 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for the entire $41.0 million mortgage loan for Hotel Monaco Denver to fix the interest rate at 2.98% for the entire term of the loan. Also in August 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for the entire $38.0 million mortgage loan for Andaz Napa to fix the interest rate at 2.99% for the remaining term of the loan. In September 2016, the Company paid off the $97 million mortgage loan collateralized by the Renaissance Atlanta Waverly Hotel & Convention Center. In October 2016, the Company elected its prepayment option under the terms of three hotel mortgage loans, including the Renaissance Austin Hotel, the Courtyard Birmingham Downtown at UAB and the Marriott Griffin Gate Resort & Spa, each of which had maturities in either 2016 or 2017, and repaid the outstanding balances and accrued interest totaling $130.7 million. Also in October, the Company modified two mortgage loans, which resulted in $41 million of additional proceeds, and extended the maturity dates of the loan through January 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid off hotel mortgage debt totaling $276.9 million with proceeds from asset sales and cash on hand. As of December 31, 2016, the remaining hotel level mortgage debt was $783.8 million, and had a weighted average interest rate of 3.31% and a weighted average debt maturity of 4.7 years, including available extension options. Approximately, 53.4% of our outstanding debt is at a fixed rate and we continue to evaluate further reducing our variable rate interest expense using interest rate hedges. See “Part II Item. 7 Derivative Instruments” for more information related to our hedging policy and transaction activity. 73 Borrowings Debt as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 consisted of the following (dollars in thousands): Rate Type(1) Rate(2) Maturity Date(3) December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Balance Outstanding as of Mortgage Loans Renaissance Atlanta Waverly Hotel & Convention Center(4) Renaissance Austin Hotel(5) Courtyard Pittsburgh Downtown(6) Marriott Griffin Gate Resort & Spa(7) Courtyard Birmingham Downtown at UAB(5) Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville(8) Fairmont Dallas Residence Inn Denver City Center Bohemian Hotel Savannah Riverfront Andaz Savannah Hotel Monaco Denver Hotel Monaco Chicago Loews New Orleans Hotel Andaz Napa Fixed Fixed Fixed Variable Fixed Fixed Variable Variable Variable Variable 5.50% 5.51% 4.00% 3.02% 5.25% 6.46% 2.66% 3.00% 3.10% 2.62% Fixed(9) 2.98% Variable Variable 2.95% 2.98% Fixed(10) 2.99% 12/6/2016 12/8/2016 3/1/2017 3/23/2017 4/1/2017 2/1/2018 4/10/2018 4/17/2018 12/17/2018 1/14/2019 1/17/2019 1/17/2019 2/22/2019 3/21/2019 $ — $ — — — — — 55,498 45,210 27,480 21,500 41,000 21,644 37,500 38,000 97,000 83,000 22,607 34,374 13,353 27,775 56,217 45,210 27,480 21,500 41,000 26,000 37,500 38,000 Westin Galleria Houston & Westin Oaks Houston at The Galleria Variable 3.12%(11) 5/1/2019 110,000 110,000 Marriott Charleston Town Center Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston (VIE) Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook (VIE) Marriott Dallas City Center(12) Hyatt Regency Santa Clara(12) Hotel Palomar Philadelphia(13) Residence Inn Boston Cambridge Grand Bohemian Hotel Orlando(14) Total Mortgage Loans Mortgage Loan Premium / Discounts, net(15) Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs, net Senior Unsecured Credit Facility Unsecured Term Loan $175M Unsecured Term Loan $125M(17) Debt, net of loan discounts, premiums and unamortized deferred financing costs(18) (1) Variable index is one month LIBOR. Fixed Variable Variable Variable Variable 3.85% 3.16% 3.26% 3.01% 2.76% Fixed(13) 4.14% Fixed Fixed — — 4.48% 4.53% 3.31%(2) — — 7/1/2020 11/10/2020 12/27/2020 1/3/2022 1/3/2022 1/13/2023 11/1/2025 3/1/2026 — — Variable 2.31% 2/3/2019 Fixed(16) 2.74% 2/15/2021 Fixed(16) 3.53% 10/22/2022 16,403 19,628 25,899 51,000 90,000 60,000 63,000 60,000 16,877 19,950 25,784 40,090 60,200 — 63,000 49,360 $ 783,762 $ 956,277 (319) (6,311) — 175,000 125,000 (661) (8,305) — 175,000 — 3.24%(2) $ 1,077,132 $ 1,122,311 (2) Represents the weighted average interest rate as of December 31, 2016. (3) Initial maturity date does not include extension options, if available under the terms of the related loan agreement. (4) In September 2016, the Company elected its prepayment option and repaid the outstanding balance of the mortgage loan of $97.0 million. 74 (5) In October 2016, the Company elected its prepayment option and repaid the outstanding balance of the mortgage loans of $96.4 million. (6) In June 2016, the Company elected its prepayment option and repaid the outstanding balance of the mortgage loan of $22.3 million. (7) In March 2016, the Company elected to exercise its rights under the terms of the mortgage loan to extend the maturity date to March 23, 2017. In October 2016, the Company elected its prepayment option and repaid the outstanding balance of the mortgage loan of $33.8 million. (8) The hotel was sold in February 2016, and the related debt was paid off with proceeds from the sale. The $27.8 million balance of the mortgage was included in liabilities associated with assets held for sale as of December 31, 2015. (9) In August 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for the entire $41.0 million mortgage loan to fix the interest rate at 2.98% for the remaining term of the loan. (10) In August 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for the entire $38.0 million mortgage loan to fix the interest rate at 2.99% for the remaining term of the loan. (11) The Company modified the terms of the loan in December 2015 to lower the interest rate spread over LIBOR from 3.15% to 2.50% and to extend the prepayment provision. (12) In October 2016, the Company modified the mortgage loans collateralized by the Marriott Dallas City Center and Hyatt Regency Santa Clara. The amendments resulted in approximately $11 million and $30 million of additional proceeds, respectively, and extended the maturity dates to January 2022. (13) In January 2016, the Company entered into a $60 million mortgage loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 260 basis points, maturing in January 2023. Simultaneously with the closing of the mortgage loan, the Company entered into an interest rate swap to fix the interest rate at 4.14% for the entire term of the loan. (14) In February 2016, the Company refinanced the mortgage with a new loan bearing a 4.53% fixed interest rate and March 2026 maturity. Additional proceeds of approximately $11 million were received under the refinanced terms of the mortgage, which increased the principal of the loan from approximately $49 million to $60 million. (15) Loan premium/(discounts) on assumed mortgages recorded in purchase accounting and/or upon modification, net of accumulated amortization. (16) LIBOR has been fixed for the entire term of the loan. The spread may vary, as it is determined by the Company’s leverage ratio. (17) Funded in January 2016 in connection with the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth. (18) Includes the Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville mortgage of $27.8 million that is included in liabilities associated with assets held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. Capital Expenditures and Reserve Funds We maintain each of our properties in good repair and condition and in conformity with applicable laws and regulations, franchise agreements and management agreements. Routine capital expenditures are administered by the property management companies. However, we have approval rights over the capital expenditures as part of the annual budget process for each of our properties. From time to time, certain of our hotels may be undergoing renovations as a result of our decision to upgrade portions of the hotels, such as guest rooms, public space, meeting space and/or restaurants, in order to better compete with other hotels in our markets. In addition, upon the acquisition of a hotel we often are required to complete a property improvement plan in order to bring the hotel up to the respective brand standards. If permitted by the terms of the management agreement, funding for a renovation will first come from the furniture, fixtures and equipment reserves. We are obligated to maintain reserve funds with respect to certain agreements with our hotel management companies, franchisors and lenders to provide funds, generally 3% to 6% of hotel revenues, sufficient to cover the cost of certain capital improvements to the hotels and to periodically replace and update furniture, fixtures and equipment. Certain of the agreements require that we reserve this cash in separate accounts. To the extent that the furniture, fixtures and equipment reserves are not available or adequate to cover the cost of the renovation, we may fund a portion of the renovation with cash on hand, borrowings from our unsecured revolving credit facility and/or other sources of available liquidity. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we held a total of $58.6 million and $65.7 million, respectively, of furniture, fixtures and equipment reserves. We have been and will continue to be prudent with respect to our capital spending, taking into account our cash flows from operations. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we made cash payments totaling $58.8 million for capital expenditures. Our total capital expenditures in 2015 were $53.8 million, including $3.0 million for Napa earthquake repairs. Sources and Uses of Cash Our principal sources of cash are cash flows from operations and borrowings under debt financings including draws on our revolving credit facility. We may also obtain cash in the future from various types of equity offerings or the sale of our hotels. Our principal uses of cash are asset acquisitions, capital investments, routine debt service and debt repayments, operating costs, corporate expenses and dividends. We may also elect to use cash to buy back our common stock in the future under the Repurchase Program. 75 Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2016 to the Year Ended December 31, 2015 The table below presents summary cash flow information for the combined consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands): Net cash provided by operating activities Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities Net cash flows used in financing activities Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period Operating Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 225,643 $ 193,152 105,827 (237,570) 93,900 $ 122,154 216,054 $ (216,671) (17,380) (40,899) 163,053 122,154 $ $ $ • Cash provided by operating activities was $225.6 million and $193.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased due to (i) not incurring separation and other start-up related expenses in 2016 compared to $26.9 million that were incurred in 2015 related to our separation from InvenTrust and (ii) an increase in cash flows generated from our hotel portfolio including cash flows generated by the three hotels acquired in July 2015, the two hotel developments that began operations in the third and fourth quarter of 2015, and the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth in January 2016. These increases were offset by lost operating cash flow attributable to the sale of one hotel in October 2015 and nine hotels during the year ended December 31, 2016. Investing • Cash provided by investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2016 was $105.8 million compared to cash used in investing activities of $216.7 million during 2015. Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to proceeds of $273.2 million from the sale of nine hotels in the year ended December 31, 2016, which was offset by cash used in investing activities for (i) $58.8 million in capital improvements at our hotel properties and (ii) the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth for net cash at closing of $116 million. Cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2015 was primarily due to (i) the acquisition of three hotels in July 2015 for $245.3 million, (ii) $53.8 million in capital improvements at our hotels, (iii) $36.1 million for the two development properties and (iv) the initial deposit of $20.0 million on the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth. These expenditures were offset with $133.4 million in proceeds received from the sale of one hotel in October 2015. Financing • Cash used in financing activities was $237.6 million and $17.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily comprised of (i) cash used for mortgage principal payments of $7.6 million, (ii) the payoff of $276.9 million in mortgage loans, (iii) $74.0 million used to repurchase common shares under the Repurchase Program and (iv) the payment of $115.1 million in dividends to common stockholders and Operating Partnership unit holders, which was partially offset (v) by proceeds from mortgage debt of $112.0 million and the $125 million funding of the term loan in January 2016. Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was primarily attributed to (i) cash used for mortgage principal payments of $8.2 million, (ii) the payoff of $300.9 million in mortgage loans, (iii) $36.9 million related to the repurchase of common shares in the Tender Offer and (iv) $67.7 million dividends to common stockholders, which was offset by (i) a net contribution of $153.3 million from InvenTrust, (ii) proceeds from the unsecured term loan of $175.0 million and (iii) and proceeds from mortgage debt of $64.7 million. 76 Contractual Obligations The table below presents, on a combined consolidated basis, obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations (including interest) and lease agreements as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands): Debt maturities(1) Ground leases Corporate office lease Total Payments due by period Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than 5 years $ $ $ $ 1,263,969 120,206 5,229 1,389,404 $ $ 41,310 3,232 327 44,869 $ $ 472,575 $ 282,319 $ 6,464 815 6,464 860 467,765 104,046 3,227 479,854 $ 289,643 $ 575,038 (1) Includes principal and interest payments, for both variable and fixed rate loans. The variable rate interest payments were calculated based upon the variable rate spread plus 1 month LIBOR as of December 31, 2016. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements As of December 31, 2016, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements. Derivative Instruments In the normal course of business, we are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes. We may enter into derivative instruments including interest rate swaps, caps and collars to manage or hedge interest rate risk in accordance with the criteria of the hedging policy approved by our Board of Directors. Derivative instruments are subject to fair value reporting at each reporting date and the increase or decrease in fair value is recorded in net income (loss) or accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), based on the applicable hedge accounting guidance. We anticipate that our interest rate hedges will be highly effective because the terms of the derivative instruments exactly match the terms of the related hedged debt agreements. As such, the pending changes in the fair value of these derivatives are expected to be reflected in other comprehensive income (loss) in our combined consolidated financial statements. Derivatives expose the Company to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparties under the terms of the interest rate hedge agreements. The Company believes it minimizes the credit risk by transacting with major creditworthy financial institutions. In October 2015, the Company executed a $175 million unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable rate, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in February 2021. Simultaneously with the closing of the $175 million unsecured term loan, the Company entered into swap agreements to fix LIBOR at 1.29% for the entire term of the loan. Additionally, in October 2015, the Company executed a $125 million unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable rate, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in October 2022. In December 2015, the Company entered into various forward starting swap agreements to fix LIBOR at 1.83% for the entire term of the loan. The $125 million unsecured term loan was funded in January 2016 in connection with the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth. In January 2016, the Company entered into a $60 million mortgage loan for Hotel Palomar with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 260 basis points, maturing in January 2023. Simultaneously with the closing of the mortgage loan, the Company entered into an interest rate swap to fix the interest rate at 4.14% for the remaining term of the loan. In August 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for the entire $41.0 million mortgage loan for Hotel Monaco Denver to fix the interest rate at 2.98% for the remaining term of the loan. Also in August 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for the entire $38.0 million mortgage loan for Andaz Napa to fix the interest rate at 2.99% for the remaining term of the loan. We have designated these pay-fixed, receive-floating interest rate swap derivatives as cash flow hedges. For the year ended December 31, 2016, there was $5.0 million in unrealized gain recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. For the year ended December 31, 2015, there was $1.5 million in unrealized gain recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. In February 2017, the Company executed swaps to fix the interest rates on the loans collateralized by the Marriott Dallas City Center and the Hyatt Regency Santa Clara at 4.05% and 3.81%, respectively, which become effective March 1, 2017 through the maturity of the mortgage loans in January 2022. 77 Inflation We rely on the performance of the hotels to increase revenues to keep pace with inflation. Generally, our hotel operators possess the ability to adjust room rates daily, except for group or corporate rates contractually committed to in advance, although competitive pressures may limit the ability of our operators to raise rates faster than inflation or even at the same rate. Seasonality Demand in the lodging industry is affected by recurring seasonal patterns which are greatly influenced by overall economic cycles, the geographic locations of the hotels and the customer mix at the hotels. Generally, our hotels will have lower revenue, operating income and cash flow in the first quarter and higher revenue, operating income and cash flow in the second quarter. New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented See Note 2 to the accompanying combined consolidated financial statements included herein this Annual Report for additional information related to recently issued accounting pronouncements. 78 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Interest Rate Sensitivity We are subject to market risk associated with changes in interest rates both in terms of variable-rate debt and the price of new fixed-rate debt upon maturity of existing debt and for acquisitions. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. If market rates of interest on all of the variable rate debt as of December 31, 2016 permanently increased or decreased by 1%, the increase or decrease in interest expense on the variable rate debt would decrease or increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $5.1 million per annum. If market rates of interest on all of the variable rate debt as of December 31, 2015 permanently increased or decreased by 1%, the increase or decrease in interest expense on the variable rate debt would decrease or increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $5.8 million per annum. The decrease from prior period was driven by the management’s efforts to repay or refinance floating rate debt with fixed rate debt and the entering into interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates for the term of new loans to hedge against future increases in interest rates. With regard to our variable rate financing, we assess interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. We maintain risk management control systems to monitor interest rate cash flow risk attributable to both of our outstanding or forecasted debt obligations as well as our potential offsetting hedge positions. The risk management control systems involve the use of analytical techniques, including cash flow sensitivity analysis, to estimate the expected impact of changes in interest rates on our future cash flows. We monitor interest rate risk using a variety of techniques, including periodically evaluating fixed interest rate quotes on variable rate debt and the costs associated with converting the debt to fixed rate debt. Also, existing fixed and variable rate loans that are scheduled to mature in the near term are evaluated for possible early refinancing or extension due to consideration given to current interest rates. We have taken significant steps in reducing our variable rate debt exposure by paying off property-level mortgage debt subject to floating rates and entering into various interest rate swap agreements to hedge the interest rate exposure risk. Refer to Note 8 in the combined consolidated financial statements included herein this Annual Report, for our mortgage debt principal amounts and weighted average interest rates by year and expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes. Refer to Note 9 in the combined consolidated financial statements included herein this Annual Report for more information on our interest rate swap derivatives. We may continue to use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our properties. To the extent we do, we are exposed to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. We maintain credit policies with regard to our counterparties that we believe reduce overall credit risk. These policies include evaluating and monitoring our counterparties’ financial condition, including their credit ratings, and entering into agreements with counterparties based on established credit limit policies. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. The market risk associated with interest-rate contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. The following table provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2016, the following table presents principal repayments and related weighted-average interest rates by contractual maturity dates (in thousands): 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Total Fair Value Maturing debt (1): Fixed rate debt (mortgages and term loans)(2) $ 662 $ 2,342 $ 81,610 $17,026 $177,269 $299,493 $ 578,402 $ 583,848 Variable rate debt (mortgage loans) Total Weighted average interest rate on debt: Fixed rate debt (mortgages and $1,950 $128,558 $191,767 $42,085 — $141,000 $ 505,360 $ 490,972 $2,612 $130,900 $273,377 $59,111 $177,269 $440,493 $1,083,762 $1,074,820 term loans) 4.01% 4.36% 3.03% 3.93% 2.76% 4.07% 3.50% 3.63% Variable rate debt (mortgage loans) 3.00% 2.88% 3.02% 3.22% — 2.85% 2.95% 4.73% (1) The debt maturity excludes net mortgage discounts of $0.3 million and unamortized deferred financing costs of $6.3 million as of December 31, 2016. (2) Includes all fixed rate debt, and all variable rate debt that was swapped to fixed rates as of December 31, 2016. 79 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data See Index to Financial Statements on page F-1. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Evaluation of Disclosure on Controls and Procedures As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer has evaluated, as of December 31, 2016, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31, 2016, were effective for the purpose of ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in this Annual Report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Exchange Act and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and our principal financial officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended). The Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the fair representation of published financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Based on management’s assessment, the Company maintained, in all material respect, effective internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013). Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company’s combined consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and, as part of its audit, has issued its report, included herein on page F-3, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of ended December 31, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Item 9B. Other Information. None. 80 Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance PART III The information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 11. Executive Compensation The information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. Except as set forth below, the information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference. Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan The following table sets forth information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plan, which includes the 2014 Share Unit Plan and 2015 Incentive Award Plan as of December 31, 2016: Plan Category Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2014 Share Unit Plan(3) Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., XHR Holding, Inc. and XHR LP 2015 Incentive Award Plan Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (a) Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1) (c) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))(2) 243,769 1,497,765 — — 5,435,521 — (1) Represents (i) 243,769 shares underlying awards of “annual share units” and “contingency share units” outstanding under the Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2014 Share Unit Plan (the “Share Unit Plan”), and (ii) 238,152 shares underlying awards of restricted stock units and 1,259,613 LTIP Units (as defined in the Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., XHR Holding, Inc. and XHR LP 2015 Incentive Award Plan (the “2015 Incentive Award Plan”)) outstanding under the 2015 Incentive Award Plan, in each case, as of December 31, 2016. (2) Includes shares of common stock available for future grants under the 2015 Incentive Award Plan as of December 31, 2016. (3) On January 9, 2015, in connection with our separation from InvenTrust, the Share Unit Plan was terminated. No new share unit awards will be made under the Share Unit Plan, and the Share Unit Plan will continue to be maintained only with respect to awards outstanding as of the termination of the Share Unit Plan. See Note 14 to the accompanying combined consolidated financial statements included herein this Annual Report for additional information regarding these compensation plans. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions The information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services. The information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference. 81 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules (a) List of documents filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: 1) Financial Statements. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The combined consolidated financial statements of the Company are set forth under “Part II - Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 2) Financial Statement Schedules. The following financial statement schedule is filed herein on pages F-42 through F-45: Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the combined consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. 3) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed (or incorporated by reference herein) as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 82 Exhibit Number Exhibit Description 2.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9+ 10.10+ 10.11+ 10.12+ Separation and Distribution Agreement by and between Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. (n/k/a InvenTrust Properties Corp.) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., dated as of January 20, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on January 23, 2015) Articles of Restatement of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., as filed on November 10, 2015 with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 12, 2015) Articles Supplementary of Xenia Hotels and Resorts, Inc., as filed on November 10, 2015 with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation ((incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 12, 2015) Amended and Restated Bylaws of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015) Fourth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of XHR LP, dated as of November 10, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 12, 2015) Revolving Credit Agreement by and among XHR LP, a syndicate of bank lenders, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, dated as of February 3, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015) Parent Guaranty by Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. for the benefit of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, dated as of February 3, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015) Subsidiary Guaranty by certain subsidiaries of XHR LP for the benefit of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and a syndicate of bank lenders, dated as of February 3, 2015 Employee Matters Agreement by and between Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., dated as of February 3, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015) Transition Services Agreement by and between Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., dated as of February 3, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015) Indemnity Agreement, dated August 8, 2014, between Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on October 9, 2014) First Amendment to Indemnity Agreement by and between Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., dated as of February 3, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015) The Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2014 Share Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 25, 2014) Form of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Share Unit Award Agreement (Annual Award) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 25, 2014) Form of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Share Unit Award Agreement (Contingency) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 25, 2014) Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., XHR Holding, Inc. and XHR LP 2015 Incentive Award Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on January 9, 2015) 83 10.13+* First Amendment to Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc., XHR Holding, Inc. and XHR LP 2015 Incentive Award Plan 10.14+ 10.15+ 10.16+ Form of Stock Payment Award Grant Notice and Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on February 9, 2015) Form of Class A Performance LTIP Unit Agreement (2015) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on May 7, 2015) Form of Class A Performance LTIP Unit Agreement (2016) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-36594) filed on May 11, 2016) 10.17+* Form of Class A Performance LTIP Unit Agreement (2017) 10.18+ 10.19+ 10.20+ Form of Time-Based LTIP Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on May 7, 2015) Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-36594) filed on May 11, 2016) Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Director Compensation Program, as Amended and Restated, dated as of September 17, 2015(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-36594) filed on November 12, 2015) 10.21+* Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Director Compensation Program, as Amended and Restated, dated as of February 24, 2017 10.22+ 10.23+ 10.24+ 10.25+ 21.1* 23.1* 31.1* 31.2* 32.1* Form of LTIP Unit Agreement (Non-Employee Directors) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on March 10, 2016 Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 001-36594) filed on January 9, 2015) Form of Severance Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on May 7, 2015) Separation Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2016, between Andrew J. Welch, Xenia Hotels and Resorts, Inc., XHR Management, LLC and XHR LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Periodic Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36594) filed on March 14, 2016) Subsidiaries of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Consent of KPMG LLP Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 101.INS* XBRL Instance Document 101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document 101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document 101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document 101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document * Filed herewith + Management contract or compensatory plan 84 Item 16. Summary of Form 10-K Disclosures None. 85 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. /s/ MARCEL VERBAAS By: Marcel Verbaas Director, President and Chief Executive Officer Date: February 28, 2017 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title Date By: /s/ MARCEL VERBAAS Name: Marcel Verbaas By: /s/ ATISH SHAH Name: Atish Shah By: /s/ JOSEPH T. JOHNSON Name: Joseph T. Johnson Director, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) February 28, 2017 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer) February 28, 2017 Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer) February 28, 2017 By: /s/ JEFFREY H. DONAHUE Chairman of the Board of Directors February 28, 2017 Name: Jeffrey H. Donahue By: /s/ JOHN H. ALSCHULER, JR. Director February 28, 2017 Name: John H. Alschuler, Jr. By: /s/ KEITH E. BASS Name: Keith E. Bass Director February 28, 2017 By: /s/ THOMAS M. GARTLAND Director February 28, 2017 Name: Thomas M. Gartland By: /s/ BEVERLY K. GOULET Director February 28, 2017 Name: Beverly K. Goulet By: /s/ DENNIS D. OKLAK Director February 28, 2017 Name: Dennis D. Oklak By: /s/ MARY ELIZABETH McCORMICK Director February 28, 2017 Name: Mary Elizabeth McCormick 86 XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Index to Financial Statements Financial Statements Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 Combined Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 Combined Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 Combined Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 Notes to the Combined Consolidated Financial Statements Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2016 Page F-2 F-4 F-5 F-7 F-8 F-10 F-42 F-1 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016. In connection with our audits of the combined consolidated financial statements, we also have audited financial statement schedule III. These combined consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the combined consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic combined consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 28, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/ KPMG LLP Orlando, Florida February 28, 2017 Certified Public Accountants F-2 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.: We have audited Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and our report dated February 28, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those combined consolidated financial statements. /s/ KPMG LLP Orlando, Florida February 28, 2017 Certified Public Accountants F-3 XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Consolidated Balance Sheets As of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) Assets Investment properties: Land Building and other improvements Construction in progress Total Less: accumulated depreciation Net investment properties Cash and cash equivalents Restricted cash and escrows Accounts and rents receivable, net of allowance Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization Deferred tax assets Other assets Assets held for sale Total assets (including $74,440 and $77,140, respectively, related to consolidated variable interest entities - Note 5) Liabilities Debt, net of loan discounts, premiums and unamortized deferred financing costs Accounts payable and accrued expenses Distributions payable Other liabilities Liabilities associated with assets held for sale December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 $ $ $ $ $ 331,502 2,732,062 — 3,063,564 (619,975) 2,443,589 216,054 70,973 22,998 76,912 1,562 28,257 — 2,860,345 1,077,132 71,955 29,881 29,810 — $ $ $ $ $ 331,502 2,559,892 169 2,891,563 (476,764) 2,414,799 122,154 72,771 22,978 58,059 2,304 40,094 272,785 3,005,944 1,094,536 78,440 25,684 27,250 36,676 Total liabilities (including $47,828 and $48,582, respectively, related to consolidated variable interest entities - Note 5) $ 1,208,778 $ 1,262,586 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders’ equity Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 106,794,788 and 111,671,372 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively Additional paid in capital Accumulated other comprehensive income Accumulated distributions in excess of net earnings Total Company stockholders’ equity Non-controlling interests Total equity Total liabilities and equity 1,068 1,925,554 5,009 (302,034) 1,629,597 21,970 1,651,567 2,860,345 $ $ $ 1,117 1,993,760 1,543 (268,991) 1,727,429 15,929 1,743,358 3,005,944 $ $ $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined consolidated financial statements. F-4 XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Combined Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income For the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) Revenues: Rooms revenues Food and beverage revenues Other revenues Total revenues Expenses: Rooms expenses Food and beverage expenses Other direct expenses Other indirect expenses Management and franchise fees Total hotel operating expenses Depreciation and amortization Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and insurance Ground lease expense General and administrative expenses Business management fees Acquisition transaction costs Pre-opening expenses Provision for asset impairment Separation and other start-up related expenses Total expenses Operating income Gain on sale of investment properties Other income Interest expense Loss on extinguishment of debt Equity in losses and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net Net income before income taxes Income tax expense Net income from continuing operations Net income (loss) from discontinued operations Net income Non-controlling interests in consolidated real estate entities (Note 5) Non-controlling interests of common units in Operating Partnership (Note 1) Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests Net income attributable to the Company Distributions to preferred stockholders Net income attributable to common stockholders F-5 Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 2016 $ 653,944 $ 663,224 $ 246,479 49,737 259,036 53,884 631,901 235,066 59,699 $ 950,160 $ 976,144 $ 926,666 146,050 161,699 12,848 224,135 47,605 148,492 167,840 17,984 226,108 49,818 140,128 158,243 28,556 214,272 52,104 $ 592,337 $ 610,242 $ 593,303 152,418 148,009 141,807 46,248 5,447 32,018 — 154 — 10,035 — $ $ 838,657 111,503 $ $ 30,195 3,377 (48,113) (5,155) — 49,717 5,204 25,556 — 5,046 1,411 — 26,887 872,072 104,072 43,015 4,916 (50,816) (5,761) — 44,625 5,541 38,895 1,474 1,192 — 5,378 — $ $ 832,215 94,451 693 324 (57,427) (1,713) 4,216 40,544 (5,865) 34,679 75,120 $ $ $ $ $ $ 91,807 $ 95,426 $ (5,077) (6,295) 86,730 $ 89,131 $ — (489) 86,730 $ 88,642 $ 109,799 268 (1,143) (875) $ 567 (451) 116 85,855 $ 88,758 — (12) $ $ — — — 109,799 — 85,855 $ 88,746 $ 109,799 XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Combined Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income - Continued For the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) Basic and diluted earnings per share Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders Income from discontinued operations available to common stockholders Net income per share available to common stockholders Weighted average number of common shares (basic) Weighted average number of common shares (diluted) Comprehensive Income: Net income Other comprehensive income: Year Ended December 31, 2015 2016 2014 $ $ $ 0.79 $ — $ 0.79 $ 0.79 $ — $ 0.79 $ 0.31 0.66 0.97 108,012,708 111,989,686 113,397,997 108,142,998 112,138,223 113,397,997 $ 86,730 $ 88,642 $ 109,799 Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate derivative instruments (322) 1,543 Reclassification adjustment for amounts recognized in net income (interest expense) 3,833 — — — Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests: Non-controlling interests in consolidated real estate entities (Note 5) Non-controlling interests of common units in Operating Partnership (Note 1) Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests Comprehensive income attributable to the Company $ $ $ 90,241 $ 90,185 $ 109,799 268 (1,188) (920) $ 567 (451) 116 89,321 $ 90,301 $ $ — — — 109,799 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined consolidated financial statements. F-6 9 9 7 , 9 0 1 ) 0 8 3 , 1 8 1 , 4 ( 3 0 2 , 2 7 7 , 3 — — — — — — 5 5 2 , 8 1 8 , 1 $ 1 1 6 , 1 $ 1 1 6 , 1 $ 4 4 0 , 2 4 4 0 , 2 4 4 0 , 2 1 2 9 , 0 2 5 , 1 $ 5 5 6 , 3 $ 5 5 6 , 3 $ 2 0 1 2 4 6 , 8 8 7 6 7 , 9 4 2 — ) 6 4 9 , 6 3 ( ) 8 7 6 , 3 9 ( ) 2 1 ( ) 7 3 1 ( 8 0 9 , 2 3 4 5 , 1 8 4 2 , 0 1 ) 6 1 1 ( — — — — ) 2 0 1 ( — 4 4 2 , 2 — — ) 7 6 5 ( — — — — — — — — 8 4 2 , 0 1 8 4 2 , 0 1 — — — — — — 1 5 4 — — — ) 2 0 1 ( — 4 4 2 , 2 — — — $ ) 0 6 9 , 3 7 3 ( $ 9 9 7 , 9 0 1 — — — $ ) 1 6 1 , 4 6 2 ( $ 8 5 7 , 8 8 — — — — — — — — ) 2 1 ( ) 6 7 5 , 3 9 ( — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 4 5 , 1 $ $ l a t o T - n o N l a t o T g n i l l o r t n o c s t s e r e t n I d e t a d i l o s n o C e t a t s E l a e R s e i t i t n E g n i t a r e p O p i h s r e n t r a P d e t a l u m u c c A s n o i t u b i r t s i D f o s s e c x E n i s g n i n r a E t e N d e t a l u m u c c A r e h t O e v i s n e h e r p m o C e m o c n I l a n o i t i d d A n i d i a p l a t i p a c 4 0 6 , 0 9 1 , 2 $ — — ) 0 8 3 , 1 8 1 , 4 ( 3 0 2 , 2 7 7 , 3 7 2 4 , 1 8 7 , 1 $ — 2 0 1 7 6 7 , 9 4 2 — — — — — — — — — — $ 0 0 0 , 1 — $ — — — — — — — — $ 0 0 0 , 1 — $ — — 4 6 6 ) 7 3 1 ( — — — — — — — — — — — — — 9 1 7 , 2 3 ) 4 3 1 , 1 ( ) 9 2 9 , 6 3 ( ) 7 1 ( ) 4 4 3 , 9 5 7 , 1 ( 4 3 1 , 1 7 9 9 , 6 9 3 , 3 1 1 — — — — — — — — — — 0 3 7 , 6 8 ) 6 7 9 , 3 7 ( ) 0 7 2 , 9 1 1 ( 9 8 1 , 1 1 1 4 3 ) 6 1 3 ( ) 2 2 3 ( 3 3 8 , 3 5 7 8 — ) 2 7 3 ( 8 6 4 , 5 1 4 3 ) 6 1 3 ( ) 5 ( 0 5 ) 8 6 2 ( — — 1 4 3 ) 6 1 3 ( — — — 3 4 1 , 1 ) 2 7 3 ( 8 6 4 , 5 — — ) 5 ( 0 5 — — — — — — 5 5 8 , 5 8 ) 8 9 8 , 8 1 1 ( — — — — — — ) 7 1 3 ( 3 8 7 , 3 — ) 6 2 9 , 3 7 ( — 0 2 7 , 5 — — — — — 1 — — — — — — — — — 9 7 1 , 0 9 — ) 0 5 ( — ) 3 6 7 , 6 6 9 , 4 ( — — — — — — — — 8 5 3 , 3 4 7 , 1 $ 9 2 9 , 5 1 $ 6 3 3 , 3 1 $ 3 9 5 , 2 $ ) 1 9 9 , 8 6 2 ( $ 3 4 5 , 1 $ 0 6 7 , 3 9 9 , 1 $ 7 1 1 , 1 $ 2 7 3 , 1 7 6 , 1 1 1 — $ 7 6 5 , 1 5 6 , 1 $ 0 7 9 , 1 2 $ 3 9 0 , 3 1 $ 7 7 8 , 8 $ ) 4 3 0 , 2 0 3 ( $ 9 0 0 , 5 $ 4 5 5 , 5 2 9 , 1 $ 8 6 0 , 1 $ 8 8 7 , 4 9 7 , 6 0 1 — $ s t s e r e t n I g n i l l o r t n o c - n o N k c o t S n o m m o C k c o t S d e r r e f e r P . C N I , S T R O S E R & S L E T O H A I N E X y t i u q E n i s e g n a h C f o s t n e m e t a t S d e t a d i l o s n o C d e n i b m o C 4 1 0 2 d n a 5 1 0 2 , 6 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D d e d n E s r a e Y e h t r o F ) a t a d e r a h s r e p t p e c x e , s d n a s u o h t n i s t n u o m a r a l l o D ( t n u o m A s e r a h S t n u o m A s e r a h S — — — — — — — 5 2 1 — — — — — ) 5 2 1 ( — — — — — — — — — — — — m o r f n o i t a r a p e s h t i w n o i t c e n n o c n i s e r a h s n o m m o c f o e c n a u s s I t e n , . p r o C s e i t r e p o r P t s u r T n e v n I m o r f s n o i t u b i r t n o C s t s o c e c n a u s s i f o t e n , s e r a h s d e r r e f e r p f o e c n a u s s I . p r o C s e i t r e p o r P t s u r T n e v n I m o r f n o i t u b i r t n o C . p r o C s e i t r e p o r P t s u r T n e v n I o t s n o i t u b i r t s i D t e n , s t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c - n o n m o r f s n o i t u b i r t n o C 4 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D t a e c n a l a B ) s s o l ( e m o c n i t e N 4 1 0 2 , 1 y r a u n a J t a e c n a l a B e m o c n i t e N ) 4 8 . 0 $ ( s t i n u / s e r a h s n o m m o c , s d n e d i v i D ) 6 3 . 2 9 $ ( s e r a h s d e r r e f e r p , s d n e d i v i D t e n , s e r a h s n o m m o c f o e s a h c r u p e R . p r o C s e i t r e p o r P t s u r T n e v n I k c o t s d e r r e f e r p f o n o i t p m e d e R e m o c n i e v i s n e h e r p m o c r e h t O n o i t a s n e p m o c d e s a b - e r a h S s t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c - n o n m o r f s n o i t u b i r t n o C ) 0 1 . 1 $ ( s t i n u / s e r a h s n o m m o c , s d n e d i v i D t e n , s e r a h s n o m m o c f o e s a h c r u p e R n o i t a s n e p m o c d e s a b - e r a h S s t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c - n o n m o r f s n o i t u b i r t n o C s t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c - n o n o t s n o i t u b i r t s i D e m o c n i e v i s n e h e r p m o c r e h t O 5 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D t a e c n a l a B ) s s o l ( e m o c n i t e N t e n n i d e z i n g o c e r s t n u o m a r o f t n e m t s u j d a n o i t a c i f i s s a l c e R s t n e m u r t s n i e v i t a v i r e d e t a r t s e r e t n i n o s s o l d e z i l a e r n U 6 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D t a e c n a l a B e m o c n i . s t n e m e t a t s l a i c n a n i f d e t a d i l o s n o c d e n i b m o c e s e h t f o t r a p l a r g e t n i n a e r a s e t o n g n i y n a p m o c c a e h T 7 - F XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Combined Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (Dollar amounts in thousands) Cash flows from operating activities: Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation Amortization of above and below market leases and other lease tangibles Amortization of debt premiums, discounts, and financing costs Loss on extinguishment of debt Gain on sale of investment property, net Provision for asset impairment Equity in losses and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net Share-based compensation expense Other non-cash adjustments Prepayment penalties and defeasance Changes in assets and liabilities: Restricted cash Accounts and rents receivable Deferred costs and other assets Accounts payable and accrued expenses Other liabilities Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of investment properties Acquired goodwill, intangible assets, and intangible liabilities Capital expenditures and tenant improvements Investment in development projects Proceeds from sale of investment properties Consolidation of real estate entity Contributions to unconsolidated entities Restricted cash and escrows Deposits for acquisition of hotel properties Other assets Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities Cash flows from financing activities: Distribution to InvenTrust Properties Corp. Contribution from InvenTrust Properties Corp. Proceeds from mortgage debt and notes payable Payoffs of mortgage debt Principal payments of mortgage debt Payment of loan fees and deposits Proceeds from revolving line of credit draws Payments on revolving line of credit Proceeds from unsecured term loan Contributions from non-controlling interests Proceeds from issuance of preferred shares, net of offering costs Redemption of preferred shares Repurchase of common shares Dividends, common shares/units Dividends, preferred shares Distributions paid to non-controlling interests Payments for contingent consideration Net cash used in financing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, at end of year F-8 Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 $ 86,730 $ 88,642 $ 109,799 149,962 2,950 3,755 5,155 (30,195) 10,035 — 8,968 — (4,813) 1,574 1,470 3,244 (8,753) (4,439) 225,643 (116,000) — (58,823) — 273,161 — — 7,489 — — 105,827 $ $ — — 111,968 (276,903) (7,580) (974) 10,000 (10,000) 125,000 341 — — (73,976) (115,130) — (316) — (237,570) $ 93,900 122,154 216,054 $ $ $ $ $ 144,424 3,709 3,756 5,761 (43,015) — — 6,102 111 (5,267) 5,521 (338) 4,203 (6,425) (14,032) 193,152 (245,260) — (53,782) (36,063) 133,412 — — 3,954 (20,000) 1,068 (216,671) $ $ (23,505) 176,805 64,723 (300,894) (8,239) (6,819) 127,000 (127,000) 175,000 10,248 102 (137) (36,946) (67,706) (12) — — (17,380) $ (40,899) 163,053 122,154 $ 172,964 4,707 4,461 67,105 (136,385) 5,378 (4,216) — — (65,415) — 1,005 11,209 6,095 4,898 181,605 (178,776) (12,410) (47,267) (27,031) 1,085,451 (2,944) (30) (3,015) — 13,535 827,513 (4,168,694) 3,779,389 122,940 (648,872) (12,067) (2,083) — — — 2,044 — — — — — — (7,891) (935,234) 73,884 89,169 163,053 XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Combined Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued For the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (Dollar amounts in thousands) Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest Cash paid for income taxes Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 $ 44,567 $ 47,054 $ 7,863 4,459 79,094 1,525 Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: Consolidation of assets of joint venture Liabilities assumed at consolidation of joint venture Assumption of mortgage debt of joint venture Accrued capital expenditures Assumption of unsecured line of credit facility by InvenTrust Properties Corp. Allocation of unsecured line of credit facility by InvenTrust Properties Non-cash net distributions to InvenTrust Properties Corp. Change in fair market value of designated interest rate swaps $ — $ — $ 21,833 — — 4,838 — — — (322) — — 2,568 (96,020) — (413) 1,543 446 11,967 6,138 — 7,377 — — The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined consolidated financial statements. F-9 XENIA HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2016 1. Organization Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the “Company” or “Xenia”) is a Maryland corporation that invests primarily in premium full service, lifestyle and urban upscale hotels in Top 25 markets and key leisure destinations. Prior to February 3, 2015, Xenia was a wholly owned subsidiary of InvenTrust Properties Corp. (“InvenTrust” formerly known as Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc.), its former parent. On February 3, 2015, Xenia was spun off from InvenTrust through a taxable pro rata distribution by InvenTrust of 95% of the outstanding common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), of Xenia to holders of record of InvenTrust’s common stock as of the close of business on January 20, 2015 (the “Record Date”). Each holder of record of InvenTrust’s common stock received one share of Common Stock for every eight shares of InvenTrust’s common stock held at the close of business on the Record Date (the “Distribution”). In lieu of fractional shares, stockholders of InvenTrust received cash. On February 4, 2015, Xenia’s Common Stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “XHR.” As a result of the Distribution, the Company became a stand-alone, publicly-traded company. Xenia operates as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Substantially all of the Company’s assets are held by, and all the operations are conducted through XHR LP (the “Operating Partnership”). XHR GP, Inc. is the sole general partner of XHR LP. XHR GP, Inc. is wholly owned by the Company. As of December 31, 2016, the Company owned 98.7% of the common limited partnership units issued by the Operating Partnership (“common units”). The remaining 1.3% of the common units are owned by the other limited partners comprised of certain of our current and former executive officers and members of our Board of Directors and includes unvested long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) partnership units, which may or may not vest based on the passage of time and meeting certain market-based performance objectives. To qualify as a REIT, the Company cannot operate or manage its hotels. Therefore, the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries lease the hotel properties to XHR Holding Inc. (collectively with its subsidiaries, “XHR Holding”), the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”), which engages third-party eligible independent operators to manage the hotels. The accompanying combined consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, XHR Holding, as well as all wholly owned subsidiaries and consolidated real estate investments. The Company’s subsidiaries and real estate investments generally consist of limited liability companies (“LLCs”), limited partnerships (“LPs”) and the TRS. The effects of all inter-company transactions have been eliminated. As of December 31, 2016, the Company owned 42 lodging properties, 40 of which were wholly owned, with a total of 10,911 rooms (unaudited). As of December 31, 2015, the Company owned 50 lodging properties, 48 of which were wholly owned, with a total of 12,548 rooms (unaudited). As of December 31, 2014, the Company owned 48 lodging properties, 46 of which were wholly owned, with 12,636 rooms (unaudited). The remaining two hotels for all periods are owned through individual investments in real estate entities in which the Company has a 75% ownership interest in each investment. 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation As described in Note 1, on February 3, 2015, Xenia was spun off from InvenTrust. Prior to the separation, the Company effectuated certain reorganization transactions which were designed to consolidate the ownership of its hotels into its Operating Partnership, consolidate its TRS lessees in its TRS, facilitate its separation from InvenTrust, and enable the Company to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. The accompanying combined consolidated financial statements prior to the spin-off have been “carved out” of InvenTrust’s consolidated financial statements and reflect significant assumptions and allocations. The combined consolidated financial statements reflect the operations of the Company after giving effect to the reorganization transactions, the disposition of other hotels previously owned by the Company, and the spin-off, and include allocations of costs from certain corporate and shared functions provided to the Company by InvenTrust, as well as costs associated with participation by certain of the Company’s executives and employees in InvenTrust’s benefit plans. Corporate costs directly associated with the Company’s principal executive offices, personnel and other administrative costs are reflected as general and administrative expenses on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Additionally, prior to the spin-off, InvenTrust allocated to the Company a portion of its corporate overhead costs based upon the Company’s percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust, which is reflected in general and administrative expenses. The general and administrative expenses for the period from January 1, 2015 to February 3, 2015 and for the year ended December 31, 2014 F-10 include costs related to the reorganization transactions and spin off that are non-recurring in nature. Based on these presentation matters, the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 may not be comparable to prior periods. As InvenTrust was managing various asset portfolios, the extent of services and benefits a portfolio received was based on the size of its assets. Therefore, using average invested assets to allocate costs was a reasonable reflection of the services and other benefits received by the Company and complied with applicable accounting guidance. However, actual costs may have differed from allocated costs if the Company had operated as a stand-alone entity during such period and those differences may have been material. Each property maintains its own books and financial records and each entity’s assets are not available to satisfy the liabilities of other affiliated entities, except as otherwise disclosed in Note 8. Use of Estimates The preparation of the combined consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and revenues and expenses. These estimates are prepared using management’s best judgment, after considering past, current and expected economic conditions. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Risks and Uncertainties The Company has a geographical concentration risk related to revenues that are generated from three hotels located in the Houston-area market. For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, total revenues from our three Houston-area hotels accounted for approximately 10% and 12%, respectively, of total revenues. To the extent that there are adverse changes in this market, or the industry sectors that operate in this market, our business and operating results could be negatively impacted. The state of the overall economy can significantly impact hotel operational performance and thus, impact the Company’s financial position. Should any of our hotels experience a significant decline in operational performance, it may affect the Company’s ability to make distributions to our stockholders and service debt or meet other financial obligations. Reclassifications and Revisions Certain reclassifications were made on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 to present the hotel assets sold in 2016 as assets held for sale and liabilities associated with assets held for sale. See Note 4 for further information. Certain prior year amounts in these financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation for the year ended December 31, 2016. Consolidation The Company evaluates its investments in limited liability companies and partnerships to determine whether such entities may be a variable interest entity (“VIE”). If the entity is a VIE, the determination of whether the Company is the primary beneficiary must be made. The primary beneficiary determination is based on a qualitative assessment as to whether the entity has (i) power to direct significant activities of the VIE and (ii) an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE. The Company will consolidate a VIE if it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, Consolidation. The equity method of accounting is applied to entities in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary as defined in FASB ASC 810, or the entity is not a VIE and the Company does not have effective control, but can exercise influence over the entity with respect to its operations and major decisions. On January 1, 2016, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU 2015-02”), which amended the consolidation guidance for VIE’s and general partner’s investments in limited partnerships and modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnership and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities. Upon adoption of ASU 2015-02, the Company concluded there was no change required in the accounting of its two previously identified VIEs in our two investments in real estate entities and therefore will continue to consolidate these VIEs for reporting purposes, as further described in Note 5. However, the Company concluded that the Operating Partnership now meets the criteria as a VIE under ASU 2015-02. The Company’s significant asset is its investment in the Operating Partnership, F-11 as described in Note 1, and consequently, substantially all of the Company’s assets and liabilities represent those assets and liabilities of the Operating Partnership. As such, there is no change in the presentation of the consolidated financial statements of the Company upon adoption of ASU 2015-02. Non-controlling Interests The Company’s combined consolidated financial statements include entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Non-controlling interest is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a consolidating parent. Such non-controlling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from less-than-wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries are reported at the consolidated amounts, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and non-controlling interests. Income or loss is allocated to non-controlling interests based on their weighted average ownership percentage for the applicable period. The combined consolidated statement of equity includes beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for stockholders’ equity, non-controlling interests and total equity. However, if the Company’s non-controlling interests are redeemable for cash or other assets at the option of the holder, not solely within the control of the issuer, they must be classified outside of permanent equity. The Company makes this determination based on terms in applicable agreements, specifically in relation to redemption provisions. Additionally, with respect to non-controlling interests for which the Company has a choice to settle the contract by delivery of its own shares, the Company evaluates whether the Company controls the actions or events necessary to issue the maximum number of shares that could be required to be delivered under share settlement of the contract. As of December 31, 2016, all share-based payments awards are included in permanent equity. As of December 31, 2016, the consolidated results of the Company include the following ownership interests held by owners other than the Company: (i) the common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership held by certain current and former members of the Company’s executive officers and Board of Directors, and (ii) the outside ownership interest in our two investments in real estate entities. Revenue Recognition Revenue consists of amounts derived from hotel operations, including the sales of rooms, food and beverage and other ancillary amenities. Revenue is recognized when rooms are occupied and services have been rendered. Cash received prior to guest arrival is recorded as an advance from the guest and recognized as revenue at the time of occupancy. Sales, use, occupancy, and similar taxes are collected and presented on a net basis (excluded from revenues) in the accompanying combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. For retail operations, rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the retail leases. These revenue sources are affected by conditions impacting the travel and hospitality industry as well as competition from other hotels and businesses in similar markets. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all demand deposits, money market accounts and investments in certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements purchased with a maturity of three months or less, at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions. The combined account balances at one or more institutions periodically exceed the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. The Company believes that the risk is not significant as the Company does not anticipate the financial institutions’ non-performance. Restricted Cash and Escrows The restricted cash as of December 31, 2016 primarily consists of $58.6 million related to lodging furniture, fixtures and equipment reserves as required per the terms of our management and franchise agreements, cash held in restricted escrows of $3.6 million for real estate taxes and insurance escrows, $5.5 million in disposition related escrows, and $3.3 million capital spending reserves. The restricted cash as of December 31, 2015, primarily consists of cash held in restricted escrows of $65.7 million related to lodging furniture, fixtures and equipment reserves as required per the terms of our management and franchise agreements, $4.0 million for real estate taxes and insurance escrows, and $3.1 million in disposition related escrow and capital spending reserves. F-12 Capitalization and Depreciation Real estate is reflected at cost less accumulated depreciation. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Direct and indirect costs that are clearly related to the construction and improvements of investment properties are capitalized. Costs incurred for property taxes and insurance are capitalized during periods in which activities necessary to get the property ready for its intended use are in progress. Interest costs are also capitalized during such periods, which included $0 and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company capitalizes project management salaries and benefits and travel expenses as these are costs directly related to the renovations and capital improvements of our hotel portfolio, which included $2.1 million and $1.6 million for years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight line method. Investment properties are depreciated based upon estimated useful lives of 30 years for building and improvements and 5 to 15 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment and site improvements. Acquisition of Real Estate The Company allocates the purchase price of each acquired business (as defined in the accounting guidance related to business combinations, FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations) between tangible and intangible assets at full fair value on the acquisition date. Such tangible and intangible assets include land, building and improvements, furniture and fixtures, inventory, acquired above market and below market leases, in-place lease value (if applicable), advanced bookings, customer relationships, and any assumed financing that is determined to be above or below market terms. Any additional amounts are allocated to goodwill as required, based on the remaining purchase price in excess of the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The allocation of the purchase price is an area that requires judgment and significant estimates. The Company determines whether any financing assumed is above or below market based upon comparison to similar financing terms for similar investment properties. The Company allocates a portion of the purchase price to the estimated acquired in-place lease costs, based on estimated lease execution costs for similar leases as well as lost rent payments during assumed lease up period when calculating as if vacant fair values for properties acquired with space leases to third party tenants, which is typically retail or restaurant space. The Company also evaluates each acquired lease, including ground leases, based upon current market rates at the acquisition date and considers various factors including geographical location, size and location of leased land or retail space in determining whether the acquired lease is above or below market. After an acquired lease is determined to be above or below market, the Company allocates a portion of the purchase price to such above or below market lease intangible based upon the present value of the difference between the contractual lease rate and the estimated market rate. For leases with fixed rate renewals, renewal periods are included in the calculation of above or below market in-place lease values. The determination of the discount rate used in the present value calculation is based upon the “risk free rate” and current interest rates. This discount rate is a significant factor in determining the market valuation which requires judgment of subjective factors such as market knowledge, economics, demographics, location, visibility, age and physical condition of the property. The Company expenses acquisition costs of all acquired businesses as incurred. This includes all costs related to finding, analyzing and negotiating a transaction, whether or not the acquisition is completed. Goodwill The excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the fair values assigned to assets acquired (including identified intangible assets) and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is recognized and allocated to specific properties. The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate impairment. In accordance with FASB ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, the Company tests goodwill for impairment by making a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the specific property’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before application of the two-step goodwill impairment test. The two-step goodwill test is not performed for those assets where it is concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a specific property is greater than its carrying amount. For those specific properties where this is not the case, the two step procedure detailed below is followed in order to determine the amount of goodwill impairment. F-13 In the first step, the estimated fair value of each property with goodwill is compared to the carrying value of the property’s assets, including goodwill. The fair value is based on estimated future cash flow projections that utilize discount and capitalization rates, which are generally unobservable in the market place (Level 3 inputs), but approximate the inputs the Company believes would be utilized by market participants in assessing fair value. The estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors, including the historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions. If the carrying amount of the property’s assets, including goodwill, exceeds its estimated fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. In this second step, if the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount of goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded in an amount equal to that excess. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had goodwill of $42.1 million, which is included in intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company tested goodwill for impairment as of December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 and recorded no impairment to goodwill for each of the years then ended. Impairment The Company assesses the carrying values of the respective long-lived assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable, such as a reduction in the expected holding period of the asset or a change in demand for lodging at the Company’s hotels. If it is determined that the carrying value is not recoverable because the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed carrying value, the Company records an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds fair value. The valuation and possible subsequent impairment of investment properties is a significant estimate that can and does change based on the Company’s continuous process of analyzing each property and reviewing assumptions about uncertain inherent factors, as well as the economic condition of the property at a particular point in time. The use of projected future cash flows and related holding period is based on assumptions that are consistent with the estimates of future expectations and the strategic plan the Company uses to manage its underlying business. However, assumptions and estimates about future cash flows and capitalization rates are complex and subjective. Changes in economic and operating conditions and the Company’s ultimate investment intent that occur subsequent to the impairment analyses could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment charges of the real estate properties. Investment Properties Held for Sale In determining whether to classify an investment property as held for sale, the Company considers whether: (i) management has committed to a plan to sell the investment property; (ii) the investment property is available for immediate sale, in its present condition; (iii) the Company is actively marketing the investment property for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its fair value; (iv) the Company has initiated a program to locate a buyer; (v) the Company believes that the sale of the investment property is probable; (vi) the Company has received a significant non-refundable deposit for the purchase of the property; and (vii) actions required for the Company to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that any significant changes will be made to the plan. If all of the above criteria are met, the Company classifies the investment property as held for sale. On the day that these criteria are met, the Company suspends depreciation on the investment properties held for sale, including depreciation for additions, as well as on the amortization of acquired in-place leases. The investment properties and liabilities associated with those investment properties that are held for sale are classified separately on the consolidated balance sheets for the most recent reporting period and recorded at the lesser of the carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. All historical periods presented for investment properties and liabilities associated with those investment properties that are held for sale are reclassified for comparative purposes. Additionally, if the sale constitutes a strategic shift with a major effect on operations, the operations are classified on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Disposition of Real Estate The Company accounts for dispositions in accordance with FASB ASC 360-20, Real Estate Sales. The Company recognizes gain in full when real estate is sold, provided (a) the profit is determinable, that is, the collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured or the amount that will not be collectible can be estimated, and (b) the earnings process is virtually complete, that is, the seller is not obliged to perform significant activities after the sale to earn the profit and the buyer has paid a significant non-refundable deposit. Prior to 2014, the Company recorded all dispositions as discontinued operations for the applicable periods presented. Upon the adoption of ASU 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, the Company records a disposition as discontinued operations only if it represents a strategic shift and has (or will have) a major effect on the Company’s results and operations. F-14 Discontinued Operations In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity (“ASU 2014-08”), which included amendments that changed the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and required additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity’s results and operations would qualify as discontinued operations. In addition, ASU 2014-08 expanded the disclosure requirements for disposals that meet the definition of a discontinued operation and requires entities to disclose information about disposals of individually significant components that do not meet the definition of discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 was effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that began after December 15, 2014. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2014-08. Effective January 1, 2014 asset disposals were included as a component of income from continuing operations unless the disposal represented a strategic shift and has (or will have) a major effect on the entity’s results and operations. Deferred Financing Costs Financing costs related to senior unsecured credit facility and long-term debt are recorded at cost and are amortized as interest expense on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the life of the related debt instrument, unless there is a significant modification to the debt instrument. The balance of unamortized deferred financing costs related to the line of credit is included in other assets and costs related to long-term debt are presented in debt on the consolidated balance sheet. Deferred financing costs related to the line of credit were $3.1 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, which was offset by accumulated amortization of $1.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Deferred financing costs related to long-term debt were $12.5 million and $18.5 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which was offset by accumulated amortization of $6.2 million and $10.2 million, respectively. Derivatives and Hedging Activities In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effects of interest rate changes. The Company limits the risks associated with interest rate changes by following established risk management policies and procedures which may include the use of derivative instruments. The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Company assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged items. Instruments that meet these hedging criteria are formally designated as hedges at the inception of the derivative contract and are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with offsetting changes recorded to other comprehensive income (loss). The Company nets assets and liabilities when the right of offset exists. Ineffective portions of changes in the fair value of a cash flow hedge are recognized as interest expense. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. Comprehensive Income The purpose of reporting comprehensive income is to report a measure of all changes in equity of an entity that result from recognized transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with owners in their capacity as owners. Comprehensive income consists of all components of income, including other comprehensive income, which is excluded from net income. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, comprehensive income was $89.3 million, $90.3 million and $109.8 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income was $5.0 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Income Taxes The Company has elected to be taxed as, and has operated in a manner that management believes will allow it to continue to qualify as, a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”) for federal income tax purposes. As long as the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that is currently distributed to its stockholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, without the benefit of certain relief provisions, the Company will be subject to federal, state and local income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates and will not be eligible to re-elect REIT status for the four years following the failure. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company also may be subject to certain federal, state, and local taxes on its income and assets, including (1) alternative minimum F-15 taxes, (2) taxes on any undistributed income, (3) taxes related to its TRS, (4) certain state or local income taxes, (5) franchise taxes, (6) property taxes, and (7) transfer taxes. It is the Company’s current intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Company’s qualification for taxation as a REIT. To continue to qualify as a REIT, the Company cannot operate or manage its hotels. Accordingly, the Company, through its Operating Partnership, leases all of its hotels to subsidiaries of its TRS. The TRS is subject to federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates. The Company has elected to treat certain of its consolidated subsidiaries, and may in the future elect to treat newly formed subsidiaries, as TRSs pursuant to the Code. TRSs may participate in non-real estate related activities and/or perform non-customary services for tenants and are subject to federal and state income tax at regular corporate tax rates. Lease revenue at the Operating Partnership and lease expense from the TRS subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation for financial statement purposes. The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized based on consideration of available evidence, including future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income and tax-planning strategies. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company’s analysis in determining the deferred tax asset valuation allowance involves management judgment and assumptions. Income tax expense in the combined consolidated financial statements for the period from January 1, 2015 through February 3, 2015 and for year ended December 31, 2014 was calculated on a “carve-out” basis from InvenTrust. Share-Based Compensation The Company has adopted a share-based incentive plan that provides for the grant of stock options, stock awards, restricted stock units, performance units and other equity-based awards. Share-based compensation is measured at the estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant, adjusted for forfeitures, and recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the longest vesting period for each grant for the entire award. The determination of fair value of these awards is subjective and involves significant estimates and assumptions including expected volatility of the Company’s shares, expected dividend yield, expected term and assumptions of whether certain of these awards will achieve parity with other Operating Partnership units or achieve performance thresholds. Share-based compensation is included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and capitalized in building and other improvements in the consolidated balance sheets for certain employees that manage property developments, renovations and capital improvements. During 2014, the Company maintained the Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2014 Share Unit Plan. The 2014 Share Unit Plan provided for the grant of “share unit” awards to eligible participants. The value of a “share unit” was determined based on a phantom capitalization of the Company’s lodging business and does not necessarily correspond to the value of a share of common stock of Xenia. Vesting of the share units granted in 2014 was conditioned upon the occurrence of a triggering event, such as a listing, which occurred on February 4, 2015. The Company did not recognize share based compensation expense until the triggering event occurred. Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing the net income available to common stockholders by the weighted- average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding the weighted average number of unvested shared-based compensation awards outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the effect of any dilutive securities. Any anti-dilutive securities are excluded from the diluted earnings per-share calculation. F-16 Segment Information We allocate resources and assess operating performance based on individual hotels and consider each one of our hotels to be an operating segment. All of our individual operating segments meet the aggregation criteria. All of our other real estate investment activities are immaterial and meet the aggregation criteria, and thus, we report one segment: investment in hotel properties. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective, although it will not affect the accounting for rental related revenues. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, pursuant to ASU No. 2015-09 which deferred the adoption date by one year. Early adoption is permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2014-09 and related updates will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. Although the Company is still evaluating the revenue streams and the timing of recognition under the new model, a significant change to our current revenue recognition policies is not expected. Additionally, the Company has begun evaluating the sale of non-financial assets to entities that are not customers, such as the disposition of real estate assets. Historically, hotel dispositions have been cash sales that required no contingencies for future involvement in the hotel’s operations and, therefore, the Company does not expect ASU No. 2014-09 to have a material impact on its recognition of hotel sales. The Company has not yet selected a transition method. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which replaces ASC Topic 840, Leases, and requires most lessee leases to be recorded on the Company’s balance sheet as either operating or financing leases with a right of use asset with a corresponding lease liability measured at present value. Operating leases will be recognized on the income statement on a straight-line basis as lease expense and financing leases will be accounted for similar to the accounting for amortizing debt. Leases with terms of less than 12 months will continue to be accounted for as they are under the current standard. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is still evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on its combined consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, but expects potentially significant lease-related right of use assets and liabilities to be recorded on the balance sheet for both equipment and ground leases. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which changes the way certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified on the statement of cash flows in order to reduce diversity in practice across all industries. The standard clarifies classification for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, and contingent consideration payments made after business combination among other things. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, however, early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect ASU No. 2016-15 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, which enhances the presentation requirements of restricted cash. The standard aims to unify presentation and minimize the diversity in practice. These presentation changes include increased disclosures surrounding the restrictions on cash and the inclusion of the restricted cash balance in the reconciliation completed at the end of the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, however, early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect ASU No. 2016-18 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The guidance is intended to assist entities with evaluating whether a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. Under the new guidance, an entity first determines whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If this threshold is met, the set is not a business. If the threshold is not met, the entity then evaluates whether the set meets the requirement that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, however, early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2017-01 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. F-17 Also in January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment. The guidance is intended to simplify the accounting for goodwill impairment and removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test under the current guidance, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment under ASU 2017-04 will be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. All other goodwill impairment guidance will remain largely unchanged. Entities will continue to have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. The same one-step impairment test will be applied to goodwill at all reporting units, even those with zero or negative carrying amounts. Entities will be required to disclose the amount of goodwill at reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. The new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2020, however, early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2017-04 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. 3. Investment Properties In January 2016, the Company acquired the Hotel Commonwealth located in Boston, Massachusetts for a purchase price of $136 million, excluding closing costs, which were expensed and included in acquisition costs on the combined consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. The source of funding was proceeds from the $125 million term loan entered into by the Company, as further described in Note 8, and a $20 million escrow deposit applied to the purchase price at closing. The hotel has a total of 245-rooms (unaudited), which includes a 96-room (unaudited) hotel expansion that was completed in December 2015. The Hotel Commonwealth is subject to a long-term ground lease, which expires in 2087, and was assumed by the Company as part of the hotel’s acquisition. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company acquired three hotels for a total purchase price of $245 million, excluding closing costs of $4.5 million, which were expensed and included in acquisitions costs on the combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. The sources of funding for the acquisition were cash on hand and borrowings under the Company’s senior unsecured credit facility. The following is a summary of the hotel acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands): Property Canary Santa Barbara Hotel Palomar Philadelphia RiverPlace Hotel Total Location Acquisition Date (Unaudited) Purchase Price(1) Rooms Santa Barbara, CA Philadelphia, PA Portland, OR July 2015 July 2015 July 2015 97 230 84 411 $ $ 80,000 100,000 65,000 245,000 (1) All hotels are managed by Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, LLC and were acquired as part of a portfolio acquisition. The following reflects the purchase price allocation for the hotel acquired during the year ended December 31, 2016 and the three hotels acquired during the year ended December 31, 2015 (in thousands): Land Building and improvements Furniture, fixtures, and equipment Intangibles and other assets(1) Total purchase price December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 $ — $ 103,847 10,238 21,915 49,743 172,928 21,907 422 $ 136,000 $ 245,000 (1) As part of the purchase price allocation for the Hotel Commonwealth, the Company allocated $21.7 million to a below market lease intangible that will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the underlying ground lease, which expires in 2087. The revenues and net income attributable to the hotel acquired in 2016 were approximately $25.7 million and $4.2 million, respectively, for the year December 31, 2016 and are included in the Company’s combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The revenues and net income attributable to the three hotels acquired in 2015 were approximately $24.4 million and $5.0 million, respectively, for the year December 31, 2015 and are included in the Company’s combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. F-18 The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the results of operations as if the 2016 and 2015 acquisitions had taken place on January 1, 2015. The unaudited pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of what actual results of operations of the Company would have been, nor does it purport to represent the results of operations for future periods. The unaudited proforma financial information is as follows (in thousands, except per share and per share data): Revenue Net income attributable to common stockholders (1) Net income per share attributable to common stockholders - basic and diluted Weighted average number of common shares - basic Weighted average number of common shares - diluted Year Ended December 31, 2016 $ $ $ 950,454 86,571 0.80 $ $ $ 2015 1,018,916 85,348 0.76 108,012,708 111,989,686 108,142,998 112,138,223 (1) The pro forma results above exclude acquisition costs of $0.1 million and $4.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Involuntary Conversion of Assets On August 24, 2014, Napa, California experienced a 6.0 magnitude earthquake that impacted two of the Company’s lodging properties. The Company recorded involuntary losses of $9.0 million, which represents the book value of the properties and equipment written off for the property damage. As it was probable that the Company would receive insurance proceeds to compensate for the property damages, the Company also recorded an offsetting insurance recovery receivable of $9.0 million. As of December 31, 2016 or 2015, there was no remaining receivable related to property damage insurance recoveries. The Company will not record an insurance recovery receivable for business interruption losses until the amount for such recoveries is known and the amount is realizable. The business interruption insurance recovery for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $6.2 million, and is included in other income on the combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2016, there was no remaining receivable related to business interruption insurance recoveries. F-19 4. Disposed Properties The following represents the disposition details for the properties sold during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 (in thousands, except rooms): Property Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville(1) DoubleTree by Hilton Washington DC(1) Embassy Suites Baltimore North/Hunt Valley(1) Marriott Atlanta Century Center/Emory Area & Hilton Phoenix Suites(1)(2) Hilton St. Louis Downtown at the Arch(1) Hampton Inn & Suites Denver Downtown, Hilton Garden Inn Chicago North Shore/Evanston, and Homewood Suites by Hilton Houston Near the Galleria(1)(2) Total for the year ended December 31, 2016 Hyatt Regency Orange County(1) Total for the year ended December 31, 2015 Crowne Plaza Charleston Airport - Convention Center(1) DoubleTree Suites Atlanta Galleria(1) Suburban Select Service Portfolio - 52 properties(3) Holiday Inn Secaucus Meadowlands(1) Total for the year ended December 31, 2014 Date 02/2016 04/2016 05/2016 06/2016 12/2016 12/2016 10/2015 05/2014 08/2014 11/2014 12/2014 Rooms (unaudited) Gross Sale Price Net Proceeds Gain on sale / (Impairment) 248 220 223 513 195 488 1,887 656 656 166 154 6,976 161 7,457 $ 36,000 $ 32,055 (4) $ 65,000 (5) 20,000 63,550 19,459 50,750 21,500 (5) 50,048 20,896 649 (96) (8,036) (1,903) 252 97,000 (5) 92,653 29,152 $ 290,250 $ 278,661 $ 20,018 137,000 132,995 (6) 43,178 $ 137,000 $ 132,995 $ 43,178 13,250 12,600 2,027 11,907 960 (96) 1,071,000 533,399 135,670 4,600 3,927 (171) $ 1,101,450 $ 551,260 $ 136,363 (1) Included in net income from continuing operations in the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the periods of ownership in accordance with ASU No. 2014-08 through the date of their disposition, as they did not represent a strategic shift or have a major effect on the Company’s results of operations. (2) The hotels were sold as part of a portfolio sales agreement. (3) In November 2014, the Company sold 52 select-service hotels (the “Suburban Select Service Portfolio”) consisting of 6,976 rooms (unaudited). The sale of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio represented a strategic shift and had a major impact on the financial statements. The operations of these 52 select service hotels are reflected as discontinued operations pursuant to ASU 2014-08 on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. (4) The Company was entitled to net proceeds at closing of $32.1 million, and in conjunction with the sale repaid the $27.8 million outstanding property level mortgage. (5) As of December 31, 2016, $5.5 million of the sales proceeds related to escrows held back at closing were outstanding. The Company expects to collect these amounts in 2017. (6) The Company received net proceeds of $70.6 million, after paying off the $61.9 million outstanding property level mortgage at the time of the sale, and retained the $5.9 million balance in the hotel’s capital expenditure reserve account. F-20 The major classes of assets and liabilities for the nine properties disposed of during the year ended December 31, 2016 were reclassified as held for sale at December 31, 2015 as follows (in thousands): Land (1) Building and other improvements Total Less accumulated depreciation Net investment properties Restricted cash and escrows Accounts and rents receivable, net Intangible assets, net Deferred costs and other assets Total assets held for sale Debt Accounts payable and accrued expenses Other liabilities Total liabilities of assets held for sale December 31, 2015 $ $ $ $ $ $ 43,196 344,091 387,287 (125,875) 261,412 4,826 1,727 2,456 2,364 272,785 27,775 8,211 690 36,676 (1) The Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville and the Marriott Atlanta Century Center/Emory Area were subject to ground leases. The Company has no future obligations under the terms of these ground leases as part of the disposition of these hotels. In January 2015, one land parcel, valued at $1.2 million, was transferred to InvenTrust and was included in the net contributions from InvenTrust in the accompanying combined consolidated statement of changes in equity. In November 2014, InvenTrust sold the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, which were properties overseen by the Company. During early 2015, the Company incurred carryover costs related to the Suburban Select Service Portfolio. The following table presents the results of operations for the respective periods that the Company owned such assets or was involved with the operations of such ventures during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands): Revenues Depreciation and amortization expense Other expenses Operating (loss) income from discontinued operations Interest and other expense Income tax expense Gain on sale of properties Loss on extinguishment of debt Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 $ — $ 224,490 — 511 $ (511) $ — — 22 — 35,864 146,229 42,397 (33,012) (4,566) 135,692 (65,391) Net (loss) income from discontinued operations $ (489) $ 75,120 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from the properties classified as discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $(0.5) million and $(18.2) million, respectively. Net cash provided by (used in) for investing activities by the properties classified as discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $0 and $1,043.3 million, respectively, consisting primarily of proceeds from the dispositions, net of capital expenditures. 5. Investment in Real Estate Entities Consolidated Entities During 2013, the Company entered into two investments in real estate entities in order to develop the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook. The Company has ownership interests of 75% in each entity. F-21 These entities are considered VIE’s as defined in FASB ASC 810, Consolidation, because the entities do not have enough equity to finance their activities without additional subordinated financial support. The Company determined that it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE’s that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, as well as the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE’s that could potentially be significant to the VIE, or the right to receive benefits from the VIE’s that could potentially be significant to the VIE. As such, the Company has a controlling financial interest and is considered the primary beneficiary of each of these entities. Therefore, these entities are consolidated by the Company. The following are the liabilities of the consolidated VIE’s, which are non-recourse to the Company, and the assets that can be used to settle those obligations (in thousands): Net investment properties Other assets Total assets Mortgages payable Other liabilities Total liabilities Net assets December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 $ 71,157 3,283 $ 74,440 (45,287) (2,541) $(47,828) $ 26,612 $ 74,592 2,548 $ 77,140 (45,734) (2,848) $(48,582) $ 28,558 In August 2015, the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston began operations as a lifestyle hotel. The total development cost of the property was $32 million. In October 2015, the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook began operations as a lifestyle hotel. The total development cost of the property was $45 million. Under the terms of the two investment agreements, the Company’s total capital investment in these two development properties was limited to $7.2 million and $9.6 million for the Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston and the Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook, respectively. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015 there were no amounts remaining to be invested by the Company. All operations of the two hotels from the date of their respective opening were consolidated in the accompanying combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income, with a corresponding allocation for non-controlling interests. Unconsolidated Entities Prior to February 21, 2014, the Company owned an interest in one unconsolidated partnership entity. On February 21, 2014, the Company bought out its partner’s interest in this entity and began consolidating this investment in its financial statements. In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded the assets and liabilities of the entity at fair value resulting in a gain of $4.5 million. Prior to the entity being wholly owned, the equity method of accounting was used to account for this investment and the Company’s share of net income or loss was reflected in the combined consolidated financial statements as equity in earnings in losses and gain on consolidation of unconsolidated entity, net. In November 2014, this property was sold as part of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, and as of December 31, 2016, the Company does not have any remaining investments in unconsolidated entities. F-22 The summarized results of operations of the Company’s investment prior to the purchase of the remaining interest in the joint venture for the year ended December 31, 2014 are presented below (in thousands): Revenues Expenses: Interest expense and loan cost amortization Depreciation and amortization Operating expenses, ground rent and general and administrative expenses Termination fee Total expenses Net loss Company’s share of net loss 6. Transactions with Related Parties The following table summarizes the Company’s related party transactions (in thousands): January 1 - February 20, 2014 $ 932 43 129 802 325 1,299 (367) (293) $ $ Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 General and administrative allocation (a) $ 1,135 $ Business management fee (b) Loan placement fees (c) Transition services fees (d) — — 514 20,747 1,474 68 — (a) General and administrative allocations include costs from certain corporate and shared functions provided to the Company by InvenTrust, as well as costs associated with participation by certain of the Company’s executives in InvenTrust’s benefit plans. InvenTrust allocated to the Company a portion of its corporate overhead costs which was based upon the Company’s percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust. As InvenTrust was managing various asset portfolios, the extent of services and benefits a portfolio received was based on the size of its assets. Therefore, using average invested assets to allocate costs was a reasonable reflection of the services and other benefits received by the Company and complied with applicable accounting guidance. However, actual costs may have differed from allocated costs if the Company had operated as a stand-alone entity during such period and those differences may have been material. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the general and administrative allocation related to the Suburban Select Service Portfolio was $0 and $4.8 million and was included in discontinued operations on the combined consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. Following the time of the spin-off, the Company was not allocated any further general and administrative expenses. (b) During the first quarter of 2014, InvenTrust paid a business management fee to its external manager, Inland American Business Manager and Advisor, Inc. (the “Business Manager”) based on the average invested assets. The Company was allocated a portion of the business management fee based upon its percentage share of the average invested assets of InvenTrust. On March 12, 2014, InvenTrust entered into a series of agreements and amendments to existing agreements with affiliates of The Inland Group, Inc. pursuant to which InvenTrust began the process of becoming entirely self- managed (collectively, the “Self-Management Transactions”). In connection with the Self-Management Transactions, InvenTrust agreed with the Business Manager to terminate its management agreement with the Business Manager. The Self-Management Transactions resulted in a final business management fee incurred in January 2014. As a result, the Company was not allocated a business management fee after January 2014. (c) The Company paid a related party of InvenTrust 0.2% of the principal amount of each loan placed for the Company. Such costs were capitalized as loan fees and amortized over the respective loan term. As a result of the spin-off, the Company will no longer be allocated any loan placement fees. F-23 (d) In connection with the Company’s separation from InvenTrust, the Company entered into a transition services agreement with InvenTrust under which InvenTrust agreed to provide certain transition services to the Company, including services related to information technology systems, financial reporting and accounting and legal services. The expiration date varied by service provided and the agreement terminated on the earlier of March 31, 2016 or the termination of the last service provided under it. In June 2015, the Company terminated all fee-based services provided under the transition services agreement effective July 31, 2015, and thereafter, no additional fees were incurred for services provided by InvenTrust. As of December 31, 2015, the Company owed $2.6 million to InvenTrust, which is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet, for purchases of furniture, fixtures and equipment funded by InvenTrust and for other taxes paid by InvenTrust on behalf of the Company. 7. Intangible Assets and Goodwill The following table summarizes the Company’s identified intangible assets, intangible liabilities and goodwill as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands): Intangible assets: Acquired in-place lease intangibles Acquired above market lease costs Acquired below market ground lease Advance bookings Accumulated amortization Net intangible assets Goodwill Total intangible assets, net Intangible liabilities: Acquired below market lease costs Acquired above market ground lease Accumulated amortization Intangible liabilities, net December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 $ $ $ $ $ 2,247 405 36,208 263 (4,324) 34,799 42,113 76,912 (4,477) — 791 (3,686) $ $ $ $ $ 2,942 482 17,091 12,092 (16,661) 15,946 42,113 58,059 (4,631) — 691 (3,940) The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired above market lease costs and acquired below market lease costs are amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the related lease, including the respective renewal period for below market lease costs with fixed rate renewals, as an adjustment to other revenues. Amortization pertaining to the above market lease is applied as a reduction to other revenues. Amortization pertaining to the below market lease costs is applied as an increase to other revenues. The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired in-place lease intangibles is amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the related lease and is recorded as amortization expense. The portion of the purchase price allocated to acquired below market ground lease is amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the related lease and is recorded as ground lease expense. The portion of the purchase price allocated to advance bookings is amortized on a straight line basis over the estimated life and is recorded as depreciation and amortization. F-24 The following table summarizes the amortization related to intangibles for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands): Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles: Acquired above market lease costs Acquired below market lease costs Net other revenues increase attributable to amortization Acquired in-place lease intangibles Acquired below market ground lease Advance bookings Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 $ $ $ $ $ (102) 254 152 608 647 1,699 $ $ $ $ $ (124) 272 148 964 380 2,485 The following table presents the amortization during the next five years and thereafter related to intangible assets and liabilities at December 31, 2016 (in thousands): 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Total Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles: Acquired above market lease costs $ (38) $ (20) $ (19) $ — $ — $ — $ (77) Acquired below market lease costs 249 194 194 194 194 2,661 3,686 Net other revenues increase attributable to amortization $ 211 $ 174 $ 175 $ 194 $ 194 $ 2,661 $ 3,609 Acquired in-place lease intangibles Acquired below market ground lease Advance bookings $ 471 669 31 $ 157 669 12 $ 100 669 — $ — $ — $ — $ 728 669 — 669 — 30,606 33,951 — 43 F-25 8. Debt Debt as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands): Mortgage Loans Renaissance Atlanta Waverly Hotel & Convention Center(3) Renaissance Austin Hotel(4) Courtyard Pittsburgh Downtown(5) Marriott Griffin Gate Resort & Spa(6) Courtyard Birmingham Downtown at UAB(4) Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville(7) Fairmont Dallas Residence Inn Denver City Center Bohemian Hotel Savannah Riverfront Andaz Savannah Hotel Monaco Denver Hotel Monaco Chicago(9) Loews New Orleans Hotel Andaz Napa Rate Type(1) Rate(2) Maturity Date December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Balance Outstanding as of Fixed Fixed Fixed 5.50% 12/6/2016 $ 5.51% 12/8/2016 4.00% 3/1/2017 Variable 3.02% 3/23/2017 Fixed Fixed Variable Variable Variable Variable 5.25% 6.46% 4/1/2017 2/1/2018 2.66% 4/10/2018 3.00% 4/17/2018 3.10% 12/17/2018 2.62% 1/14/2019 Fixed(8) 2.98% 1/17/2019 Variable Variable 2.95% 1/17/2019 2.98% 2/22/2019 Fixed(10) 2.99% 3/21/2019 — — — — — — 55,498 45,210 27,480 21,500 41,000 21,644 37,500 38,000 $ 97,000 83,000 22,607 34,374 13,353 27,775 56,217 45,210 27,480 21,500 41,000 26,000 37,500 38,000 Westin Galleria Houston & Westin Oaks Houston at The Galleria Variable 3.12% (11) 5/1/2019 110,000 110,000 Marriott Charleston Town Center Grand Bohemian Hotel Charleston (VIE) Grand Bohemian Hotel Mountain Brook (VIE) Marriott Dallas City Center(12) Hyatt Regency Santa Clara(12) Hotel Palomar Philadelphia(13) Residence Inn Boston Cambridge(14) Grand Bohemian Hotel Orlando(15) Total Mortgage Loans Mortgage Loan Premium / Discounts, net(16) Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs, net Senior Unsecured Credit Facility Unsecured Term Loan $175M Unsecured Term Loan $125M(18) Debt, net of loan discounts, premiums and unamortized deferred financing costs(19) (1) Variable index is one month LIBOR. (2) Represents the weighted average interest rate as of December 31, 2016. Fixed 3.85% 7/1/2020 Variable Variable Variable Variable 3.16% 11/10/2020 3.26% 12/27/2020 3.01% 2.76% 1/3/2022 1/3/2022 Fixed(13) 4.14% 1/13/2023 Fixed Fixed 4.48% 11/1/2025 4.53% 3/1/2026 16,403 19,628 25,899 51,000 90,000 60,000 63,000 60,000 16,877 19,950 25,784 40,090 60,200 — 63,000 49,360 3.31% (2) $ 783,762 $ 956,277 — — — — — — Variable 2.31% 2/3/2019 Fixed(17) 2.74% 2/15/2021 Fixed(17) 3.53% 10/22/2022 (319) (6,311) — 175,000 125,000 (661) (8,305) — 175,000 — 3.24% (2) $1,077,132 $1,122,311 (3) In September 2016, the Company elected its prepayment option and repaid the outstanding balance of the mortgage loan of $97 million. (4) In October 2016, the Company elected its prepayment option for the Renaissance Austin Hotel and the Courtyard Birmingham Downtown at UAB and repaid the outstanding balances of the mortgage loans of $83 million and $13 million, respectively. (5) In June 2016, the Company elected its prepayment option and repaid the outstanding balance of the mortgage loan of $22.3 million. (6) In March 2016, the Company elected to exercise its rights under the terms of the mortgage loan to extend the maturity date to March 23, 2017. In October 2016, the Company elected its prepayment option and repaid the outstanding balance of the mortgage loan of $33.8 million. F-26 (7) The hotel was sold in February 2016, and the related debt was paid off with proceeds from the sale. The $27.8 million balance of the mortgage was included in liabilities associated with assets held for sale as of December 31, 2015. (8) In August 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for the entire $41.0 million mortgage loan to fix the interest rate at 2.98% for the remaining term of the loan. (9) During 2016, the Company made additional principal payments of $4.4 million to comply with covenant requirements under the terms of the mortgage loan. (10) Obtained incremental proceeds under terms of the mortgage of $7.5 million in November 2015. Then, in August 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for the entire $38.0 million mortgage loan to fix the interest rate at 2.99% for the remaining term of the loan. (11) The Company modified the terms of the loan in December 2015 to lower the interest rate spread over LIBOR from 3.15% to 2.50% and to extend the prepayment provision. (12) In October 2016, the Company modified the loans collateralized by the Marriott Dallas City Center and the Hyatt Regency Santa Clara. The amendments resulted in $11 million and $30 million of additional proceeds, respectively, and extended the maturity dates to January 2022. (13) In January 2016, the Company entered into a $60 million mortgage loan maturing in January 2023. Simultaneously with the closing of the mortgage loan, the Company entered into an interest rate swap to fix the interest rate at 4.14% for the remaining term of the loan. (14) In October 2015, Company refinanced the mortgage with a new loan bearing a 4.48% fixed interest rate and November 2025 maturity. Additional proceeds of $33 million were received under the refinanced terms of the mortgage. (15) In February 2016, the Company refinanced the mortgage with a new loan bearing a 4.53% fixed interest rate and March 2026 maturity. Additional proceeds of approximately $11 million were received under the refinanced terms of the mortgage, which increased the principal of the loan from approximately $49 million to $60 million. (16) Loan premium/(discounts) on assumed mortgages recorded in purchase accounting and/or upon modification, net of the accumulated amortization. (17) LIBOR has been fixed for the entire term of the loan. The spread may vary, as it is determined by the Company’s leverage ratio. (18) Funded in January 2016 in connection with the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth. (19) Includes the Hilton University of Florida Conference Center Gainesville mortgage of $27.8 million that is included in liabilities associates with assets held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. In connection with repaying mortgage loans during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred prepayment and extinguishment fees of approximately $4.8 million and $5.3 million, respectively, which is included in the loss on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the period then ended. The loss from extinguishment of debt also represents the write-off of any unamortized deferred financing costs incurred when the original agreements were executed and termination penalty payments. Debt outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $1,084 million and $1,131 million and had a weighted average interest rate of 3.24% and 3.51% per annum, respectively. Mortgage premiums and discounts was a net $0.3 million and $0.7 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The following table shows scheduled debt maturities for the next five years and thereafter (in thousands): 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Total Debt Total Mortgage Discounts, net Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs, net Debt, net of loan discounts and unamortized deferred financing costs As of December 31, 2016 Weighted average interest rate $ $ $ 2,612 130,900 273,377 59,111 177,269 440,493 1,083,762 (319) (6,311) 3.26% 2.91% 3.02% 3.42% 2.81% 3.68% 3.24% — — 1,077,132 3.24% Of the total outstanding debt at December 31, 2016, approximately $13.9 million is recourse to the Company. Certain loans have options to extend the maturity dates if exercised by the Company, subject to being compliant with certain covenants and the prepayment of an extension fee. We expect to repay, refinance, or extend our maturing debt as they become due. F-27 Term Loan Facilities In October 2015, the Company executed a $175 million unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable rate, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in February 2021. Simultaneously with the closing of the $175 million unsecured term loan, the Company entered into swap agreements to fix LIBOR at 1.29% for the entire term of the loan, for a combined rate of 2.74% as of December 31, 2016. A portion of the proceeds from the $175 million unsecured term loan was used to pay off the outstanding balance on the unsecured revolving credit facility and the remaining proceeds were used to pay off one property level mortgage with a principal balance of $53 million. Additionally, in October 2015, the Company executed a $125 million unsecured term loan with an interest rate of LIBOR plus the applicable rate, as defined per the respective agreement, maturing in October 2022. In December 2015, the Company entered into swap agreements to fix LIBOR at 1.83% for the entire term of the loan, for a combined rate of 3.53% as of December 31, 2016. The $125 million unsecured term loan was funded in January 2016 in connection with the acquisition of the Hotel Commonwealth. Senior Unsecured Credit Facility Prior to the consummation of the spin-off, the Company was allocated $96.0 million of InvenTrust’s revolving credit facility. Effective February 3, 2015, this allocation was terminated and the Company entered into a new $400 million senior unsecured credit facility with a syndicate of banks. The new revolving credit facility includes an uncommitted accordion feature which, subject to certain conditions, allows the Company to increase the aggregate availability by up to an additional $350 million. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest based on LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.45% (or, at the Company’s election upon achievement of an investment grade rating from Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. or Standard & Poor’s Rating Services, interest based on LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.875% to 1.50%). In addition, until such election, the Company is required to pay an unused commitment fee of up to 0.30% of the unused portion of the credit facility based on the average daily unused portion of the credit facility; thereafter, the Company is required to pay a facility fee ranging between 0.125% and 0.35% based on the Company’s debt rating. As of December 31, 2016, there was no outstanding balance on the senior unsecured facility. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 the Company incurred unused fees of approximately $1.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Financial Covenants Our senior unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loan agreements contain a number of covenants that restrict our ability to incur debt in excess of calculated amounts, restrict our ability to make distributions under certain circumstances and generally require us to maintain certain financial ratios. Failure of the Company to comply with the financial covenants contained in its credit facilities, unsecured term loans and non-recourse secured mortgages could result from, among other things, changes in its results of operations, the incurrence of additional debt or changes in general economic conditions. If the Company violates the financial covenants contained in any of its credit facility, unsecured term loans or mortgages described above, the Company may attempt to negotiate waivers of the violations or amend the terms of the applicable credit facilities, unsecured term loans or mortgages with the lenders thereunder; however, the Company can make no assurance that it would be successful in any such negotiations or that, if successful in obtaining waivers or amendments, such amendments or waivers would be on terms attractive to the Company. If a default under the credit facilities or unsecured term loans were to occur, the Company would possibly have to refinance the debt through additional debt financing, private or public offerings of debt securities, or equity financings. If the Company is unable to refinance its debt on acceptable terms, including at maturity of the credit facility, unsecured term loans, or mortgages it may be forced to dispose of hotel properties on disadvantageous terms, potentially resulting in losses that reduce cash flow from operating activities. If, at the time of any refinancing, prevailing interest rates or other factors result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, increases in interest expense would lower the Company’s cash flow, and, consequently, cash available for distribution to its stockholders. A cash trap associated with a mortgage loan may limit the overall liquidity for the Company as cash from the hotel securing such mortgage would not be available for the Company to use. If the Company is unable to meet mortgage payment obligations, including the payment obligation upon maturity of the mortgage borrowing, the mortgage securing the specific property could be foreclosed upon by, or the property could be otherwise transferred to, the mortgagee with a consequent loss of income and asset value to the Company. As of December 31, 2016, the Company is in compliance with all debt covenants, current on all loan payments and not otherwise in default under the credit facility, unsecured term loans or mortgage loans. F-28 9. Derivatives The Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, unrealized gains and losses on the effective portion are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity. Unrealized gains and losses on the ineffective portion of all designated hedges are recognized in earnings in the current period. At December 31, 2016, all derivative instruments were designated as cash flow hedges. At December 31, 2016, the aggregate fair value of interest rate swap assets of $5.1 million was included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had an unrealized loss of $0.3 million that is included in the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. At December 31, 2015, the aggregate fair value of interest rate swap assets of $1.8 million was included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the aggregate fair value of interest rate swap liabilities of $0.3 million was included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company had an unrealized gain of $1.5 million that is included in the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The following table summarizes the terms of the derivative financial instruments held by the Company and the asset (liability) that has been recorded (in thousands): Hedged Debt $175M Term Loan $175M Term Loan $175M Term Loan $125M Term Loan $125M Term Loan $125M Term Loan $125M Term Loan Mortgage Debt Mortgage Debt Mortgage Debt Type Fixed Rate Swap 1.30% Swap 1.29% Swap 1.29% Swap 1.83% Swap 1.83% Swap 1.84% Swap 1.83% Swap 1.54% Swap 0.88% Swap 0.89% Index 1-Month LIBOR + 1.50% 1-Month LIBOR + 1.50% 1-Month LIBOR + 1.50% 1-Month LIBOR + 1.80% 1-Month LIBOR + 1.80% 1-Month LIBOR + 1.80% 1-Month LIBOR + 1.80% 1-Month LIBOR + 2.60% 1-Month LIBOR + 2.50% 1-Month LIBOR + 2.50% Effective Date Maturity December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Notional Amounts Fair Value 10/22/2015 2/15/2021 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 767 $ 604 10/22/2015 2/15/2021 65,000 65,000 1,022 10/22/2015 2/15/2021 60,000 60,000 940 817 754 1/15/2016 10/22/2022 50,000 50,000 193 (229) 1/15/2016 10/22/2022 25,000 25,000 1/15/2016 10/22/2022 25,000 25,000 1/15/2016 10/22/2022 25,000 25,000 88 84 80 1/13/2016 1/13/2023 60,000 9/1/2016 1/17/2019 41,000 — — 1,200 327 (145) (126) (132) — — 9/1/2016 3/21/2019 38,000 $439,000 — $300,000 354 $5,055 — 1,543 There were no amounts recognized in earnings related to hedge ineffectiveness or amounts excluded from hedge ineffectiveness testing during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. F-29 For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company reclassified $3.8 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense. The Company expects approximately $1.6 million will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense in the next 12 months. 10. Fair Value Measurements In accordance with FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures, the Company defines fair value based on the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company uses a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which are described below: • Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access. • Level 2 - Observable inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. • Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs. The Company has estimated the fair value of its financial and non-financial instruments using available market information and valuation methodologies it believes to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, accordingly, they are not necessarily indicative of amounts that would be realized upon disposition. Recurring Measurements For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, quantitative disclosure of their fair value is as follows, which is netted as applicable per the terms of the respective master netting agreements (in thousands): Description Assets Interest rate swaps Liabilities Interest rate swaps Total Fair Value Measurement Date December 31, 2016 Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 2) December 31, 2015 Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 2) $ $ 5,055 — 5,055 $ $ 1,820 (277) 1,543 The fair value of each derivative instrument is based on a discounted cash flow analysis of the expected cash flows under each arrangement. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative instrument, including the period to maturity, and utilizes observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities, which are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company also incorporates credit value adjustments to appropriately reflect each parties’ nonperformance risk in the fair value measurement, which utilizes level 3 inputs such as estimates of current credit spreads. However, the Company has assessed that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of the derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Non-Recurring Measurements Investment Properties During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company identified three hotel properties that had a reduction in their expected holding period and reviewed the probability of the assets’ disposition. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $10.0 F-30 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, based on the estimated fair value using purchase contracts and average selling costs. These properties were subsequently sold in April, May, and June 2016, respectively. No impairments were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2015. Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value The table below represents the fair value of financial instruments presented at carrying values in the combined consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands): Debt Total December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value $ $ 1,083,443 1,083,443 $ $ 1,074,820 1,074,820 $ $ 1,130,616 1,130,616 $ $ 1,137,149 1,137,149 The Company estimates the fair value of its mortgages payable using a weighted average effective interest rate of 4.14% and 3.48% per annum as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The assumptions reflect the terms currently available on similar borrowing terms to borrowers with credit profiles similar to the Company’s. The Company has determined that its debt instrument valuations are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the carrying amounts of certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments and the recent acquisition of these items. 11. Income Taxes The Company elected to be taxed as, and has operated in a manner that management believes will allow the Company to continue to qualify as, a REIT under the Code for federal income tax purposes. So long as the Company qualifies as s a REIT, it generally will not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on the net taxable income that is currently distributed to its stockholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, without the benefit of certain relief provisions, the Company will be subject to federal, state and local income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates and will not be eligible to re-elect REIT status for the four years following the failure. Even if the Company continues to qualify for taxation as a REIT, the Company also may be subject to certain federal, state, and local taxes on its income and assets, including (1) alternative minimum taxes, (2) taxes on any undistributed income, (3) taxes related to its TRS, (4) certain state or local income taxes, (5) franchise taxes, (6) property taxes, and (7) transfer taxes. The Company has elected to treat certain of its consolidated subsidiaries, and may in the future elect to treat newly formed subsidiaries, as TRSs pursuant to the Code. TRSs may participate in non-real estate related activities and/or perform non-customary services for tenants and are subject to federal and state income tax at regular corporate tax rates. The Company’s hotels are leased, through its Operating Partnership, to certain subsidiaries of the Company’s TRS. Lease revenue at the Operating Partnership and lease expense from the TRS subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation for financial statement purposes. For the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company recognized income tax expense of $5.1 million. The Company determined income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 using an estimated federal and state statutory combined rate of 36.26%. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recognized income tax expense of $6.3 million, of which $1.9 million of the expense related to taxes on a gain on the transfer of a hotel resulting in a more optimal structure in connection with the Company’s intention to elect to be taxed as a REIT. The Company’s effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate predominately due to the dividends paid deduction, state income taxes, and changes to valuation allowances. During the year ended 2014, the Company recognized $5.9 million income tax expense which was calculated on a “carve-out” basis from InvenTrust. During the year ended 2014, the Company also recognized income tax expense of $4.6 million related to the operations of the Suburban Select Service Portfolio, which was included in discontinued operations. F-31 For both the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, 100% of the distributions made to stockholders were taxable as ordinary income for federal tax purposes. The provision for income taxes related to continuing operations consisted of the following: Years Ended December 31, 2015 2014 2016 Current: Federal State Total current Deferred: Federal State Total deferred Total tax provision Total tax provision attributable to discontinued operations $ $ $ $ $ $ (3,139) $ (4,028) $ (1,196) (2,178) (4,335) $ (6,206) $ (1,340) (1,102) (2,442) (71) $ (471) $ (3,303) (671) (742) $ 382 (89) $ (5,077) $ (6,295) $ — $ — $ (120) (3,423) (5,865) (4,566) Below is a reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate to the income or loss for continuing operations before income taxes: Years Ended December 31, 2015 2014 2016 Provision for income taxes at statutory rate Tax benefit related to REIT operations Income for which no federal tax benefit was recognized Valuation allowances Impact of rate change on deferred tax balances State tax provision, net of federal Other Total tax provision $ (32,024) $ (33,393) $ (14,199) 28,351 (7) (20) (666) (986) 275 27,783 (1,930) 2,752 — (1,706) 199 8,786 (3,092) 3,496 — (1,015) 159 $ (5,077) $ (6,295) $ (5,865) Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included within deferred costs and other assets and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets, respectively, and are attributed to the activity of the Company’s TRS. The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows: Net operating loss Deferred income Miscellaneous Total deferred tax assets Less: Valuation allowance Net deferred tax assets 2016 2015 4,501 $ 1,414 89 6,004 $ 5,063 1,567 100 6,730 (4,442) (4,426) 1,562 $ 2,304 $ $ $ The Company’s remaining U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards were $11.2 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and are all subject to limitation. As such, the Company has established a valuation allowance against such amounts. The Company had state net operating loss carryfowards of $26.1 million and $11.2 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, certain of which are subject to limitation. As such, the Company established a $23.4 million and $11.2 million valuation allowance as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, against these amounts. F-32 Deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized based on consideration of available evidence, including future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future projected taxable income, and tax-planning strategies. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company has considered various factors, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, and tax-planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon tax-planning strategies and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the existing valuation allowance of $4.4 million, at December 31, 2016. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced. During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company increased $20 thousand and reversed $2.8 million, respectively, of the valuation allowance associated with certain deferred tax assets generated by net operating losses. In connection with the utilization of all non-limited U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards, the Company has determined that such difference will be fully realized. Uncertain Tax Positions The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits as of or during the three-year period ended December 31, 2016. The Company expects no significant increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits due to changes in tax positions within one year of December 31, 2016. The Company has no material interest or penalties relating to income taxes recognized in the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 or in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. As of December 31, 2016, the Company’s 2016, 2015, and 2014 tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. and various state tax jurisdictions. 12. Stockholders’ Equity Preferred Shares The Company is authorized to issue up to 50 million shares of preferred stock, 0.01 par value per share. On January 5, 2015, the Company issued 125 shares of preferred stock of the Company, designated as 12.5% Series A Cumulative Non-Voting Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), in a private placement to approximately 125 investors who qualify as “accredited investors” (as that term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”)) for an aggregate purchase price of $125 thousand. On September 30, 2015, the Company redeemed its 125 outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock and the Operating Partnership redeemed its 125 outstanding units of the Series A Preferred Units, for $1,000 per share/unit plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $31.25 per share/unit, and a $100.00 redemption premium, for an aggregate per share/unit redemption of $1,131.25. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock ceased accruing on September 30, 2015. Following the redemption, in accordance with the Company’s charter, the Board of Directors of the Company reclassified the unissued shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock as authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock without designation as to series. Common Shares The Company is authorized to issue up to 500 million shares of its Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share. On February 3, 2015, the Company spun off from InvenTrust, its former parent, through a taxable pro rata distribution by InvenTrust of 95% of the Common Stock as of the close of business on January 20, 2015. Each holder of record of InvenTrust’s common stock received one share of Common Stock for every eight shares of InvenTrust’s common stock held at the close of business on the Record Date. In lieu of fractional shares, stockholders of InvenTrust received cash. On February 4, 2015, Xenia’s Common Stock began trading on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “XHR.” As a result of the spin-off, the Company became a stand-alone, publicly-traded company. On February 4, 2015, in conjunction with the listing of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE, the Company commenced a modified “Dutch Auction” self-tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) to purchase for cash up to $125 million in value of shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a price not greater than $21.00 nor less than $19.00 per share, net to the seller in cash, less any F-33 applicable withholding of taxes and without interest. The Tender Offer expired on March 5, 2015. As a result of the Tender Offer, the Company accepted for purchase 1,759,344 shares of its Common Stock at a purchase price of $21.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $36.9 million (excluding fees and expenses relating to the Tender Offer), which was funded from cash on hand. The 1,759,344 shares of Common Stock accepted for purchase in the Tender Offer represented approximately 1.6% of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding as of February 3, 2015, the last day prior to the commencement of the Tender Offer. Stockholders who properly tendered and did not properly withdraw shares of Common Stock in the Tender Offer at or below the final purchase price of $21.00 per share had all of their tendered shares of Common Stock purchased by the Company at $21.00 per share. Distributions Common Stock The Company declared dividends of $1.10 per common stock totaling $118.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 and $0.84 per common stock totaling $93.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2015. For income tax purposes, dividends paid per share on our common stock during the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were 100% taxable as ordinary income. Preferred Stock The Company declared and paid dividends of $12 thousand on its 12.5% Series A preferred stock during the year ended December 31, 2015. For income tax purposes, dividends paid per share on our common stock during the year ended December 31, 2015 were 100% taxable as ordinary income. Non-controlling Interest of Common Units in Operating Partnership As of December 31, 2016, the Operating Partnership had 1,378,573 long-term incentive partnership units (“LTIP units”) outstanding, representing a 1.3% partnership interest held by the limited partners. Of the 1,378,573 LTIP units outstanding at December 31, 2016, 118,960 units had vested. Only vested LTIP units may be converted to common units of the Operating Partnership, which in turn can be tendered for redemption as described in the Note 14. As of December 31, 2015, the Operating Partnership had 521,450 long-term incentive partnership units (“LTIP units”) outstanding, representing a 0.5% partnership interest held by the limited partners. The Company declared dividends of $1.10 per LTIP unit totaling $372 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2016 and $0.84 per LTIP unit totaling $102 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company accrued $97 thousand and $34 thousand, respectively, in dividends related to the LTIP units. Stock Repurchase Program In December 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program (the “Repurchase Program”) pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to $100 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock, par value $0.01, per share, in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans. The Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date. The Company is not obligated to repurchase any dollar amount or any number of shares of common stock, and repurchases may be suspended or discontinued at any time. As of December 31, 2015, no shares were repurchased under the Repurchase Program. In November 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $75 million of the Company’s outstanding common shares. Repurchases may be made in open market, in privately-negotiated transactions or by other means, including Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. This repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time, and does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of shares. For the year ended December 31, 2016, 4,966,763 shares, had been repurchased under the Repurchase Program, at a weighted average price of $14.89 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $74 million. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $101 million remaining under its share repurchase authorization. 13. Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus any F-34 shares that could potentially be outstanding during the period. Any anti-dilutive shares have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation. Unvested share-based awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Accordingly, distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to unvested share-based compensation (participating securities) have been excluded, as applicable, from net income or loss available to common stockholders used in the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations. Income allocated to non-controlling interest in the Operating Partnership has been excluded from the numerator and Operating Partnership Units and vested LTIP Units in the Operating Partnership have been omitted from the denominator for the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share since including these amounts in the numerator and denominator would have no impact. For periods prior to the spin-off, basic and diluted earnings per share was calculated by dividing net income attributable to the Company by the 113.4 million shares of Common Stock outstanding upon the completion of the spin-off (based on a distribution ratio of one share of Common Stock for every eight shares of InvenTrust common stock). The following table reconciles net income to basic and diluted EPS (in thousands, except share and per share data): Numerator: Net income from continuing operations Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities (Note 5) Non-controlling interests of common units in Operating Partnership (Note 1) Dividends, preferred shares Dividends, unvested share-based compensation Net income from continuing operations available to common stockholders Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax Net income available to common stockholders Denominator: Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic Effect of dilutive share-based compensation Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted Basic and diluted earnings per share: Net income from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax Net income per share 14. Share Based Compensation 2014 Share Unit Plan Year Ended December 31, 2015 2016 2014 $ $ 86,730 268 (1,143) — (473) 85,382 — $ $ 89,131 567 (451) (12) (132) 89,103 (489) 34,679 — — — — 34,679 75,120 85,382 $ 88,614 $ 109,799 108,012,708 130,290 111,989,686 148,537 113,397,997 — 108,142,998 112,138,223 113,397,997 0.79 — 0.79 $ $ 0.79 — 0.79 $ $ 0.31 0.66 0.97 $ $ $ $ $ On September 17, 2014, the board of directors of InvenTrust and the Company’s Board of Directors adopted and ratified the Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2014 Share Unit Plan (the “2014 Share Unit Plan”). The 2014 Share Unit Plan provided for the grant of notional “share unit” awards to eligible participants. The 2015 Incentive Award Plan, as defined below, replaced the 2014 Share Unit Plan in connection with the Company’s separation from InvenTrust, and the 2014 Share Unit Plan was terminated in connection with the implementation of the 2015 Incentive Award Plan. Awards outstanding under the 2014 Share Unit Plan at the time of its termination will remain outstanding in accordance with their terms, and the terms and conditions of the 2014 Share Unit Plan will continue to govern such awards. F-35 During 2014, InvenTrust and the Company granted share units to certain members of management, the vesting of which was conditioned upon a triggering event, such as a listing or a change in control (the “2014 Share Unit Grants”). A triggering event occurred in February 2015 upon the completion of the spin-off of the Company. As of December 31, 2016, 98,486 of the 2014 Share Unit Grants were outstanding to certain members of management that will pro-rata vest annually over the remaining two years of the original three year vesting period and are based on continued employment. Additionally, as of December 31, 2016, 145,283 of the 2014 Share Unit Grants were outstanding to certain members of management that cliff vest in March 2017 and are based on continued employment. Each 2014 Share Unit Grant is convertible to one unit of Common Stock upon vesting. 2015 Incentive Award Plan On January 9, 2015, the Company adopted, and InvenTrust as its sole common stockholder approved, the Company’s 2015 Incentive Award Plan (the “2015 Incentive Award Plan”) effective as of February 2, 2015 (the date prior to the date of the Company’s separation from InvenTrust), under which the Company may grant cash and equity incentive awards to eligible service providers in order to attract, motivate and retain the talent for which the Company competes. The plan allows for the grant of both share-based awards relating to the Company’s common stock and partnership units (“LTIP units”) in the Operating Partnership. In February 2015, the Board of Directors and certain members of management were granted 25,988 fully vested shares of Common Stock which had a weighted average grant date fair value of $20.55 per share. Restricted Stock Units Grants Between May 5, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the Compensation Committee (“the Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the Company granted share units to certain members of management (the “2015 Restricted Stock Units”). The 2015 Restricted Stock Units include 67,669 share units that are time-based and vest over a three-year period, and 17,032 share units that are performance based. Both the time-based and performance-based units are subject to continued employment and have a weighted average grant date fair value of $20.18 per share. In March 2016, the Compensation Committee (“the Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the Company granted share units to certain Company employees (the “2016 Restricted Stock Units”). The 2016 Restricted Stock Units include 104,079 restricted stock units that are time-based and vest over a three-year period and 51,782 restricted stock units that are performance-based. Both the time-based and performance-based units are subject to continued employment and have a weighted average grant date fair value of $13.09 per share. In April 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company granted an additional 26,738 time-based 2016 Restricted Stock Units to a new executive, with a grant date fair value of $15.34, with 50% of the time-based 2016 Restricted Stock Units vesting on February 4, 2017 and the remaining 50% vesting on February 4, 2018. Other than the new awards granted to a new executive, each time-based 2016 Restricted Stock Unit will vest as follows, subject to the employee’s continued service through each applicable vesting date: 33% on February 4, 2017, which is the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date of the award (February 4, 2016), 33% on the second anniversary of the vesting commencement date, and 34% on the third anniversary of the vesting commencement date. Of the performance-based 2015 and 2016 Restricted Stock Units, twenty-five percent (25%) are designated as absolute total stockholder return (“TSR”) units (the “Absolute TSR Share Units”), and vest based on varying levels of the Company’s TSR over the defined performance period. The other seventy-five percent (75%) of the performance-based 2015 and 2016 Restricted Stock Units are designated as relative TSR share units (the “Relative TSR Share Units”) and vest based on the ranking of the Company’s TSR as compared to its defined peer group over the defined performance period. LTIP Unit Grants LTIP Units are a class of limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership. Initially the LTIP Units do not have full parity with common units of the Operating Partnership with respect to liquidating distributions. However, upon the occurrence of certain events described in the Operating Partnership’s partnership agreement, the LTIP Units can over time achieve full parity with the common units for all purposes. If such parity is reached, vested LTIP Units may be converted into an equal number of common units on a one for one basis at any time at the request of the LTIP Unit holder or the general partner of the Operating Partnership. Common units are redeemable for cash based on the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, or, at the election of the Company, an equal number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, each subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, specified extraordinary distributions or similar events. F-36 In May 2015, the Compensation Committee approved the issuance of 409,874 performance-based LTIP Units (the “2015 Class A LTIP Units”) and 88,175 time-based LTIP Units (the “2015 Time-Based LTIP Units”) of the Operating Partnership under the 2015 Incentive Award Plan that had a weighted average grant date fair value of $14.10 per unit. Each award of 2015 Time-Based LTIP Units will vest as follows, subject to the executive’s continued service through each applicable vesting date: 33% on February 4, 2016, the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date of the award (February 4, 2015), 33% on the second anniversary of the vesting commencement date, and 34% on the third anniversary of the vesting commencement date. In June 2015, pursuant to the Company’s Director Compensation Program, as amended and restated as of May 29, 2015, the Company approved the issuance of an aggregate of 23,401 fully vested LTIP Units of the Operating Partnership under the 2015 Incentive Award Plan to the Company’s seven non-employee directors upon election to our Board of Directors with a weighted average grant date fair value of $22.44 per share In March 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the issuance of 664,515 performance-based LTIP Units (the “2016 Class A LTIP Units”) and 78,076 time-based LTIP Units (the “2016 Time-Based LTIP Units”) of the Operating Partnership under the 2015 Incentive Award Plan that had a weighted average grant date fair value of $7.86 per unit. In April 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the issuance of 110,179 2016 Class A LTIP Units and 12,945 2016 Time- Based LTIP Units to a new executive that had an average grant date fair value of $7.85 per unit. Each award of 2016 Time-Based LTIP Units will vest as follows, subject to the executive’s continued service through each applicable vesting date: 33% on February 4, 2017, which is the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date of the award (February 4, 2016), 33% on the second anniversary of the vesting commencement date, and 34% on the third anniversary of the vesting commencement date. In May 2016, pursuant to the Company’s Director Compensation Program, as amended and restated as of September 17, 2015, the Company approved the issuance of 33,894 fully vested LTIP Units of the Operating Partnership under the 2015 Incentive Award Plan to the Company’s seven non-employee directors with a weighted average grant date fair value of $15.49. A portion of each award of Class A 2015 and 2016 LTIP Units is designated as a number of “base units.” Twenty-five percent (25%) of the base units are designated as absolute TSR base units, and vest based on varying levels of the Company’s TSR over the defined performance period. The other seventy-five percent (75%) of the base units are designated as relative TSR base units and vest based on the ranking of the Company’s TSR as compared to its defined peer group over the defined performance period. LTIP Units (other than Class A LTIP Units that have not vested), whether vested or not, receive the same quarterly per-unit distributions as common units in the Operating Partnership, which equal the per-share distributions on the common stock of the Company. Class A LTIP Units that have not vested receive a quarterly per-unit distribution equal to 10% of the distribution paid on common units in the Operating Partnership. F-37 The following is a summary of the non-vested incentive awards under the 2014 Share Unit Plan and the 2015 Incentive Award Plan as of December 31, 2016 and 2015: 2014 Share Unit Plan Share Units 2015 Incentive Award Plan Restricted Stock Units(1) 2015 Incentive Award Plan LTIP Units(1) Non-vested as of January 1, 2015 Adjustment for final units at spin-off date Granted Vested Expired Forfeited Non-vested as of December 31, 2015 Granted Vested Expired Forfeited Non-vested as of December 31, 2016 Vested as of December 31, 2016 817,640 (462,959) — (8,977) — (3,485) 342,219 — — — 84,701 — — — 84,701 182,599 (98,450) (29,148) — — 243,769 107,427 — — 238,152 29,148 — — 521,450 (23,401) — — 498,049 899,609 (95,559) (42,486) — Total 817,640 (462,959) 606,151 (32,378) — (3,485) 924,969 1,082,208 (223,157) (42,486) — 1,259,613 1,741,534 118,960 255,535 Weighted average fair value of non-vested shares/units $ 20.18 $ 14.92 $ 9.67 $ 11.86 (1) Includes Time-Based LTIP Units and Class A LTIP Units. The fair value of the time-based awards is determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date and compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The grant date fair value of performance awards was determined based on a Monte Carlo simulation method with the following assumptions and compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the performance period: Performance Award Grant Date Percentage of Total Award Grant Date Fair Value by Component Volatility Interest Rate Dividend Yield May 5, 2015 Absolute TSR Restricted Stock Units Relative TSR Restricted Stock Units Absolute TSR Class A LTIPs Relative TSR Class A LTIPs March 17, 2016 and April 25, 2016 Absolute TSR Restricted Stock Units Relative TSR Restricted Stock Units Absolute TSR Class A LTIPs Relative TSR Class A LTIPs 25% 75% 25% 75% 25% 75% 25% 75% $9.51 $16.16 $9.51 $16.16 $6.88 $8.85 $7.06 $8.95 26.85% 0.09% - 1.05% 4.25% 26.85% 0.09% - 1.05% 4.25% 26.85% 0.09% - 1.05% 4.25% 26.85% 0.09% - 1.05% 4.25% 31.42% 0.50% - 1.14% 7.12% 31.42% 0.50% - 1.14% 7.12% 31.42% 0.50% - 1.14% 7.12% 31.42% 0.50% - 1.14% 7.12% The absolute and relative stockholder returns are market conditions as defined by ASC 718, Compensation Stock Compensation. Market conditions include provisions wherein the vesting condition is met through the achievement of a specific value of the Company’s common stock, which is total stockholder return, in this case. Market conditions differ from other performance awards under ASC 718 in that the probability of attaining the condition (and thus vesting in the shares) is reflected in the initial grant date fair value of the award. Accordingly, it is not appropriate to reconsider the probability of vesting in the award subsequent to the initial measurement of the award, nor is it appropriate to reverse any of the expense if the condition is not met. F-38 Therefore, once the expense for these awards is measured, the expense must be recognized over the service period regardless of whether the target is met, or at what level the target is met. Expense may only be reversed if the holder of the instrument forfeits the award by leaving the employment of the Company prior to vesting. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized approximately $9.5 million in compensation expense (net of forfeitures) related to share units, restricted stock units, and LTIP Units provided to certain of its executive officers, other officers and members of management, which included $1.2 million of accelerated share-based compensation expense related to management transition and severance agreement, $0.5 million provided to the Company’s Board of Directors, and capitalized approximately $0.6 million related to restricted stock units provided to certain members of management that oversee development and capital projects on behalf of the Company. As of December 31, 2016, there was $10.5 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested restricted stock units, Class A LTIP Units and Time-Based LTIP Units issued under the 2014 Share Unit Plan and the 2015 Incentive Award Plan, as applicable, which are expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 1.6 additional years. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recognized approximately $1.1 million, of share-based compensation expense related to vested stock and LTIP Unit payments under the 2014 Share Unit Plan and the 2015 Incentive Award Plan, of which approximately $1.1 million for year ended December 31, 2015 was provided to the Board of Directors and approximately $9 thousand was provided to certain of the Company’s officers. In addition, in connection with the 2014 Share Unit Plan and the 2015 Incentive Award Plan, during the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company recognized approximately $5.1 million, in compensation expense (net of forfeitures) related to share units, Class A LTIP Units and Time-Based LTIP Units provided to certain of its executive officers, other officers and members of management and capitalized approximately $0.4 million, related to restricted stock units provided to certain other officers and members of management that oversee development and capital projects on behalf of the Company. Additionally, this includes a cumulative catch up for compensation expenses related to the fourth quarter of 2014 because the effectiveness of the grants was subject to the completion of the spin-off of the Company from InvenTrust, which occurred on February 3, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, there was $10.4 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested restricted share units, Class A LTIP Units and Time Based LTIP Units issued under the 2014 Share Unit Plan and the 2015 Incentive Award Plan, which are expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 2 years. 15. Commitments and Contingencies Certain leases and operating agreements require the Company to reserve funds relating to replacements and renewals of the hotels’ furniture, fixtures and equipment. As of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had a balance of $58.6 million and $65.7 million, respectively, in reserves for such future improvements which is included in restricted cash and escrows on the consolidated balance sheets. In September 2016, the Company commenced on the amended lease for its corporate office headquarters. The lease expires in September 2028, and requires the Company to make annual rental payments of approximately $0.4 million which escalate over the term of lease. The Company is subject, from time to time, to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes, based on currently available information, that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial statements of the Company. In addition, in connection with the Company’s separation from InvenTrust, on August 8, 2014, the Company entered into an Indemnity Agreement, as amended, with InvenTrust pursuant to which InvenTrust has agreed to the fullest extent allowed by law or government regulation, to absolutely, irrevocably and unconditionally indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Company and its subsidiaries, directors, officers, agents, representatives and employees (in each case, in such person’s respective capacity as such) and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assignees from and against all losses, including but not limited to “actions” (as defined in the Indemnity Agreement), arising from: (1) the non-public, formal, fact-finding investigation by the SEC as described in InvenTrust’s public filings with the SEC (the “SEC Investigation”); (2) the three related demands (including the Derivative Lawsuit described below) received by InvenTrust (“Derivative Demands”) from stockholders to conduct investigations regarding claims similar to the matters that are subject to the SEC Investigation and as described in F-39 InvenTrust’ public filings with the SEC; (3) the derivative lawsuit filed on March 21, 2013 on behalf of InvenTrust by counsel for stockholders who made the first Derivative Demand (the “Derivative Lawsuit”); and (4) the investigation by the Special Litigation Committee of the board of directors of InvenTrust. In each case, regardless of when or where the loss took place, or whether any such loss, claim, accident, occurrence, event or happening is known or unknown, and regardless of whether such loss, claim, accident, occurrence, event or happening giving rise to the loss existed prior to, on or after February 3, 2015, the separation date or relates to, arises out of or results from actions, inactions, events, omissions, conditions, facts or circumstances occurring or existing prior to, on or after February 3, 2015, the separation date. On March 25, 2015, InvenTrust announced that the SEC had informed InvenTrust that the SEC had concluded its formal, non-public investigation of matters related to InvenTrust. The SEC informed InvenTrust that, based on the information received to date, it did not intend to recommend any enforcement action against InvenTrust. Ground Leases The Company leases the land from third parties underlying four of its hotels and has a partial ground lease for the meeting facility at one hotel. The average remaining initial lease term at December 31, 2016 was approximately 46 years, and the average remaining lease term including available renewal rights under the terms of the lease agreements was approximately 64 years. All of the Company’s ground leases are accounted for as operating leases. For lease agreements with scheduled rent increases, we recognize the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, we recognized ground lease expense of $5.4 million, $5.2 million, and $5.5 million, respectively, which includes amortization of ground lease intangibles and variable rent payments, and is included in ground lease expense on the combined consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2016, future minimum ground lease payments are as follows (in thousands): 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Total 16. Subsequent Events $ $ 3,232 3,232 3,232 3,232 3,232 104,046 120,206 In February 2017, the Company executed swaps to fix the interest rates on the loans collateralized by the Marriott Dallas City Center and the Hyatt Regency Santa Clara at 4.05% and 3.81%, respectively, which become effective March 1, 2017 through the maturity of the mortgage loans in January 2022. F-40 17. Quarterly Operating Results (unaudited) The following represents the results of operations, for each quarterly period, during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands, except per share data): First Quarter Year Ended December 31, 2016 Fourth Third Second Quarter Quarter Quarter Total Total revenues $ 235,035 $ 261,378 $ 233,946 $ 219,801 $ 950,160 Net income (loss) from continuing operations (9,169) 26,141 20,431 49,327 86,730 Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests Net income (loss) attributable to the Company Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders 254 (8,915) (8,915) (373) (189) (567) (875) 25,768 25,768 20,242 20,242 48,760 48,760 85,855 85,855 Net income (loss) per share available to common stockholders, basic and diluted $ (0.08) $ 0.24 $ 0.19 $ 0.44 $ 0.79 First Quarter Year Ended December 31, 2015 Fourth Third Second Quarter Quarter Quarter Total Total revenues $ 227,874 $ 251,223 $ 248,453 $ 248,594 $ 976,144 Net income (loss) from continuing operations (14,377) 23,750 17,847 61,911 89,131 Net loss from discontinued operations Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests Net income (loss) attributable to the Company Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders Net income (loss) per share available to common stockholders, basic and diluted (489) — (14,866) (14,866) — (3) 23,747 23,739 — 251 18,098 18,094 — (132) 61,779 61,779 (489) 116 88,758 88,746 $ (0.13) $ 0.21 $ 0.16 $ 0.55 $ 0.79 F-41 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 0 2 / 9 9 0 0 2 1 5 3 , 2 1 $ 9 5 9 , 7 6 $ 9 0 8 , 7 5 $ 0 5 1 , 0 1 $ 7 9 7 $ — $ 2 1 0 , 7 5 $ 0 5 1 , 0 1 $ 0 0 0 , 8 3 $ s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 4 / 3 4 1 9 1 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 0 1 / 9 9 0 0 2 8 8 0 , 9 5 7 2 , 5 3 6 0 , 5 5 4 1 1 , 8 4 5 4 4 , 9 3 5 6 7 , 6 3 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 4 1 0 2 / 8 2 / 2 9 6 9 1 2 1 3 , 4 2 5 2 8 , 6 7 1 5 2 8 , 6 7 1 9 4 9 , 6 0 8 6 , 2 — 4 8 6 , 4 3 5 5 6 3 8 , 4 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 6 / 2 9 9 9 1 8 8 8 , 3 2 4 5 , 1 2 0 1 3 , 0 2 2 3 2 , 1 0 1 3 , 1 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 2 1 0 2 / 9 / 8 9 0 0 2 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 5 1 0 2 / 6 1 / 7 5 0 0 2 2 5 6 , 6 2 2 8 , 3 6 1 7 , 7 2 6 1 4 , 5 2 2 7 7 , 0 8 1 1 4 , 8 5 0 0 3 , 2 1 6 3 , 2 2 6 7 1 , 1 9 8 5 — — — — — — 9 8 9 , 1 7 1 — — 0 3 4 , 3 4 2 1 2 , 6 3 9 4 9 , 6 — 0 8 6 , 2 0 0 5 , 1 2 0 0 0 , 9 1 2 3 2 , 1 — 0 4 2 , 4 2 2 2 8 , 7 5 1 6 3 , 2 2 — 0 0 3 , 2 0 8 4 , 7 2 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 8 0 0 2 / 8 / 2 5 0 0 2 0 1 5 , 0 1 3 7 7 , 4 2 1 2 2 , 3 2 2 5 5 , 1 1 1 4 , 2 2 5 5 , 1 0 1 8 , 0 2 — h c i h W n o e f i L n i n o i t a i c e r p e D e m o c n I t s e t a L s i t n e m e t a t S d e t u p m o C f o e t a D f o r a e Y l a n i g i r O d e t a l u m u c c A n o i t a i c e r p e D d n a s g n i d l i u B d n a d n a L n o i t i s i u q c A n o i t c u r t s n o C ) F D , ( ) E D , ( l a t o T ) D ( s t n e m e v o r p m I s t n e m e v o r p m I s t n e m t s u j d A ) C ( s i s a B o t s t n e m t s u j d A d n a L o t ) C ( s i s a B d n a s g n i d l i u B s t n e m e v o r p m I d n a L e c n a r b m u c n E y t r e p o r P d o i r e p f o d n e t a d e i r r a c h c i h w t a t n u o m a s s o r G ) A ( t s o C l a i t i n I . C N I , S T R O S E R & S L E T O H A I N E X I I I e l u d e h c S n o i t a i c e r p e D d e t a l u m u c c A d n a e t a t s E l a e R ) s d n a s u o h t n i s t n u o m a r a l l o D ( 6 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D s r a e y 0 3 - 5 8 0 0 2 / 8 / 2 9 2 9 1 6 8 9 , 1 2 6 3 9 , 2 5 2 6 1 , 2 5 4 7 7 2 4 3 , 6 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 7 0 0 2 / 1 / 7 6 2 9 1 7 1 6 , 9 3 4 6 , 3 2 7 1 2 , 0 2 6 2 4 , 3 8 6 8 , 3 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 0 1 0 2 / 1 1 / 5 2 0 9 1 / 8 9 8 1 1 0 2 , 1 1 7 9 4 , 8 3 7 9 7 , 5 3 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 1 1 0 2 / 1 / 8 8 6 9 1 9 6 5 , 7 2 9 0 5 , 6 8 9 0 8 , 7 7 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 5 1 0 2 / 7 2 / 8 5 1 0 2 6 7 7 , 1 1 5 2 , 1 3 1 0 7 , 6 2 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 5 1 0 2 / 2 2 / 0 1 5 1 0 2 5 2 6 , 2 3 2 5 , 4 4 3 2 5 , 2 4 0 0 7 , 2 0 0 7 , 8 0 5 5 , 4 0 0 0 , 2 1 1 7 , 2 5 7 1 , 7 1 9 1 1 7 7 2 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 2 1 0 2 / 7 2 / 2 1 1 0 0 2 4 4 8 , 5 1 1 8 3 , 6 8 2 4 6 , 8 7 9 3 7 , 7 2 3 1 , 3 — — — — — — — 2 4 - F 0 2 8 , 5 4 4 7 7 9 4 3 , 6 1 6 2 4 , 3 — 6 8 0 , 3 3 4 3 6 , 0 6 0 0 7 , 2 — 0 0 7 , 8 8 9 4 , 5 5 2 8 5 , 6 2 0 5 5 , 4 8 2 6 , 9 1 6 4 2 , 2 4 0 0 0 , 2 9 9 8 , 5 2 — — l e t o H n o i t c e l l o C h p a r g o t u A n a , n o i t a r b e l e C l e t o H n a i m e h o B L F , n o i t a r b e l e C n a , h a n n a v a S l e t o H n a i m e h o B l e t o H n o i t c e l l o C h p a r g o t u A A G , h a n n a v a S l e t o H h c a e B i k i k i a W n o t s A I H , u l u l o n o H o g e i D n a S z a d n A A C , o g e i D n a S h a n n a v a S z a d n A A G , h a n n a v a S a p a N z a d n A A C , a p a N a r a b r a B a t n a S y r a n a C A C , a r a b r a B a t n a S m a h g n i m r i B d r a y t r u o C B A U t a n w o t n w o D L A , m a h g n i m r i B e n o t s k c a l B / n w o t n w o D h t r o W t r o F d r a y t r u o C X T , h t r o W t r o F y t i C s a s n a K d r a y t r u o C a z a l P b u l C y r t n u o C O M , y t i C s a s n a K h g r u b s t t i P d r a y t r u o C A P n w o t n w o D , h g r u b s t t i P s a l l a D t n o m r i a F X T , s a l l a D l e t o H n a i m e h o B d n a r G C S , n o t s e l r a h C n o t s e l r a h C l e t o H n a i m e h o B d n a r G k o o r B n i a t n u o M L A , m a h g n i m r i B l e t o H n a i m e h o B d n a r G h p a r g o t u A n a , o d n a l r O l e t o H n o i t c e l l o C 0 1 5 , 5 7 9 3 7 , 7 0 0 0 , 0 6 L F , o d n a l r O h c i h W n o e f i L n i n o i t a i c e r p e D e m o c n I t s e t a L s i t n e m e t a t S d e t u p m o C f o e t a D f o r a e Y l a n i g i r O d e t a l u m u c c A n o i t a i c e r p e D d n a s g n i d l i u B d n a d n a L n o i t i s i u q c A n o i t c u r t s n o C ) F D , ( ) E D , ( l a t o T ) D ( s t n e m e v o r p m I s t n e m e v o r p m I s t n e m t s u j d A ) C ( s i s a B o t s t n e m t s u j d A d n a L o t ) C ( s i s a B d n a s g n i d l i u B s t n e m e v o r p m I d n a L e c n a r b m u c n E l e t o H d o i r e p f o d n e t a d e i r r a c h c i h w t a t n u o m a s s o r G ) A ( t s o C l a i t i n I . C N I , S T R O S E R & S L E T O H A I N E X I I I e l u d e h c S n o i t a i c e r p e D d e t a l u m u c c A d n a e t a t s E l a e R ) s d n a s u o h t n i s t n u o m a r a l l o D ( 6 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D s r a e y 0 3 - 5 7 0 0 2 / 1 / 7 6 0 9 1 0 6 0 , 9 $ 4 6 9 , 4 2 $ 4 6 2 , 3 2 $ 0 0 7 , 1 $ 7 9 1 , 2 $ — $ 7 6 0 , 1 2 $ 0 0 7 , 1 $ — $ s r a e y 0 3 - 5 6 1 0 2 / 5 1 / 1 3 0 0 2 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 1 / 1 1 2 1 9 1 2 2 2 , 5 7 6 6 , 7 6 9 2 , 4 1 1 6 9 2 , 4 1 1 — 4 2 6 , 7 5 8 6 5 , 2 4 6 5 0 , 5 1 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 8 0 0 2 / 8 / 2 0 0 0 2 5 7 1 , 0 3 6 4 2 , 9 8 6 4 4 , 0 7 0 0 8 , 8 1 7 8 0 , 6 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 1 / 1 1 7 3 9 1 / 7 1 9 1 1 2 4 , 1 1 6 5 5 , 6 7 4 1 8 , 0 7 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 1 / 1 1 4 2 9 1 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 5 1 0 2 / 8 2 / 7 9 2 9 1 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 0 1 2 / 5 1 / 1 1 8 8 9 1 3 3 2 , 9 7 7 2 , 6 7 0 3 , 6 5 3 9 , 0 6 8 5 1 , 9 5 0 4 6 , 0 0 1 0 8 5 , 1 9 2 4 7 , 5 7 7 7 , 1 0 6 0 , 9 8 0 9 , 0 8 2 2 9 , 9 3 6 8 9 , 0 4 3 9 3 , 5 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 0 2 / 9 6 8 9 1 2 8 4 , 9 1 8 8 8 , 1 1 1 8 8 8 , 1 1 1 — 1 6 6 , 1 1 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 4 1 0 2 / 5 2 / 1 1 3 5 9 1 7 8 1 4 4 8 , 6 0 0 7 , 2 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 1 1 / 0 1 2 7 9 1 5 8 2 , 1 1 8 6 5 , 9 7 9 3 0 , 6 7 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 4 2 / 0 1 9 0 0 2 4 6 0 , 8 9 5 2 , 6 4 4 9 8 , 1 4 4 4 1 , 4 9 2 5 , 3 5 6 3 , 4 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 1 1 0 2 / 5 2 / 2 2 8 9 1 4 9 7 , 2 1 4 6 6 , 5 3 4 6 6 , 5 3 — s r a e y 0 3 - 5 8 0 0 2 / 8 / 2 8 8 9 1 3 8 9 , 1 1 8 7 7 , 2 3 7 4 9 , 3 2 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 0 1 0 2 / 0 3 / 9 0 8 9 1 3 9 1 , 7 2 6 5 0 , 2 7 6 5 7 , 5 6 1 3 8 , 8 0 0 3 , 6 8 1 7 8 3 , 5 6 0 0 , 1 7 1 0 , 9 6 3 0 , 6 8 9 5 , 0 2 1 1 2 7 2 7 , 1 6 5 6 , 1 2 0 0 , 3 1 7 6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 9 5 3 , 4 6 0 0 8 , 8 1 — 5 8 0 , 4 1 1 — — 6 5 1 , 6 5 7 7 7 , 1 — 1 4 8 , 0 4 6 5 0 , 5 1 4 4 6 , 1 2 8 5 1 , 9 6 2 4 7 , 5 0 0 0 , 1 4 9 0 9 , 0 9 0 6 0 , 9 0 0 0 , 0 6 9 2 5 , 4 3 6 8 9 , 0 4 — 7 2 2 , 0 0 1 — 0 0 0 , 0 9 8 8 8 , 0 4 5 6 3 , 4 — 2 8 6 , 2 4 4 1 , 4 — 2 5 6 , 0 7 9 2 5 , 3 0 0 5 , 7 3 7 4 6 , 6 2 — 3 0 4 , 6 1 1 1 9 , 7 1 1 3 8 , 8 — 8 5 1 , 5 4 0 0 3 , 6 0 0 0 , 1 5 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 2 1 0 2 / 3 2 / 3 1 8 9 1 6 2 0 , 7 1 8 8 0 , 4 7 2 5 9 , 3 6 6 3 1 , 0 1 2 9 9 , 8 8 9 4 , 1 0 6 9 , 4 5 8 3 6 , 8 — 3 4 - F n o t g n i h s a W n n I n e d r a G n o t l i H r o b r a H r e n n I e r o m i t l a B s e t i u S & n n I n o t p m a H D M , e r o m i t l a B h t l a e w n o m m o C l e t o H A M , n o t s o B o g a c i h C o c a n o M l e t o H L I , o g a c i h C r e v n e D o c a n o M l e t o H O C , r e v n e D C D , n o t g n i h s a W n w o t n w o D C D a p S & t r o s e R t s e W y e K c i r t n e C t t a y H y t i C e k a L t l a S o c a n o M l e t o H T U , y t i C e k a L t l a S a i h p l e d a l i h P r a m o l a P l e t o H A P , a i h p l e d a l i h P a r a l C a t n a S y c n e g e R t t a y H A C , a r a l C a t n a S t r u o C g n i l t t o B t s e W y e K L F , t s e W y e K s n a e l r O w e N s w e o L A L , s n a e l r O w e N a p S & l e t o H n e i r o L A V , a i r d n a x e l A L F , t s e W y e K r e t n e C l i a t e R n w o T n o t s e l r a h C t t o i r r a M V W , n o t s e l r a h C r e t n e C l a c i d e M t a o g a c i h C t t o i r r a M I C U / t c i r t s i D L I , o g a c i h C a p S & t r o s e R e t a G n i f f i r G t t o i r r a M Y K , n o t g n i x e L r e t n e C y t i C s a l l a D t t o i r r a M X T , s a l l a D . C N I , S T R O S E R & S L E T O H A I N E X I I I e l u d e h c S n o i t a i c e r p e D d e t a l u m u c c A d n a e t a t s E l a e R ) s d n a s u o h t n i s t n u o m a r a l l o D ( 6 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D h c i h W n o e f i L n i n o i t a i c e r p e D e m o c n I t s e t a L s i t n e m e t a t S d e t u p m o C n o i t i s i u q c A n o i t c u r t s n o C ) F D , ( ) E D , ( l a t o T ) D ( f o e t a D f o r a e Y l a n i g i r O d e t a l u m u c c A n o i t a i c e r p e D d n a s g n i d l i u B s t n e m e v o r p m I d n a d n a L s t n e m e v o r p m I s t n e m t s u j d A ) C ( s i s a B o t s t n e m t s u j d A d n a L o t ) C ( s i s a B d n a s g n i d l i u B s t n e m e v o r p m I d n a L e c n a r b m u c n E l e t o H d n e t a d e i r r a c h c i h w t a t n u o m a s s o r G d o i r e p f o ) A ( t s o C l a i t i n I s r a e y 0 3 - 5 1 1 0 2 / 6 2 / 8 9 7 9 1 6 6 1 , 6 1 $ 1 6 0 , 8 8 $ 1 6 2 , 3 7 $ 0 0 8 , 4 1 $ 8 3 0 , 6 1 $ — $ 3 2 2 , 7 5 $ 0 0 8 , 4 1 $ — $ s r a e y 0 3 - 5 2 1 0 2 / 3 2 / 3 5 8 9 1 0 7 6 , 3 2 6 0 3 , 2 3 1 6 0 6 , 5 9 0 0 7 , 6 3 6 3 2 , 3 2 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 0 1 0 2 / 1 1 / 5 1 8 9 1 9 8 1 , 8 5 9 4 , 4 2 5 8 0 , 1 2 0 1 4 , 3 9 6 6 , 5 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 7 0 0 2 / 1 2 / 1 1 2 0 0 2 1 5 1 , 2 5 8 5 3 , 4 3 1 8 5 8 , 8 2 1 0 0 5 , 5 2 7 9 , 9 2 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 2 1 0 2 / 3 2 / 3 3 8 9 1 6 5 9 , 4 2 2 3 0 , 0 1 1 8 9 1 , 3 0 1 4 3 8 , 6 6 0 4 , 2 1 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 2 1 0 2 / 3 2 / 3 6 8 9 1 4 3 3 , 7 2 8 7 1 , 1 2 1 2 2 5 , 0 1 1 6 5 6 , 0 1 2 6 5 , 2 1 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 8 0 0 2 / 8 / 2 5 0 0 2 6 2 2 , 5 2 2 2 0 , 0 6 2 2 0 , 0 6 — 2 1 6 , 4 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 8 0 0 2 / 8 / 2 9 9 9 1 4 6 2 , 0 3 2 7 4 , 9 8 6 2 1 , 9 7 6 4 3 , 0 1 1 9 3 , 6 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 7 1 / 4 6 0 0 2 4 7 2 , 2 1 8 0 6 , 0 8 7 1 3 , 5 7 1 9 2 , 5 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 5 1 0 2 / 6 1 / 7 5 8 9 1 5 4 4 , 3 6 7 6 , 5 6 4 5 3 , 7 4 2 2 3 , 8 1 9 7 6 0 9 6 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 2 2 / 8 7 7 9 1 7 8 2 , 9 1 9 1 8 , 2 3 1 7 7 9 , 4 2 1 2 4 8 , 7 7 2 1 , 2 1 s r a e y 0 3 - 5 3 1 0 2 / 2 2 / 8 1 7 9 1 1 2 1 , 7 1 8 8 3 , 2 0 1 6 2 1 , 8 9 2 6 2 , 4 6 3 0 , 2 — — — — — — — — — — — 0 7 3 , 2 7 0 0 7 , 6 3 6 1 4 , 5 1 0 1 4 , 3 6 8 8 , 8 9 0 0 5 , 5 2 9 7 , 0 9 4 3 8 , 6 0 6 9 , 7 9 6 5 6 , 0 1 0 1 4 , 5 5 — — — — — — — 5 3 7 , 2 7 6 4 3 , 0 1 0 0 0 , 3 6 8 3 6 , 4 7 1 9 2 , 5 0 1 2 , 5 4 4 6 6 , 6 4 2 2 3 , 8 1 — 0 5 8 , 2 1 1 2 4 8 , 7 0 0 0 , 0 6 0 9 0 , 6 9 2 6 2 , 4 0 0 0 , 0 5 5 7 9 , 9 1 6 $ 4 6 5 , 3 6 0 , 3 $ 2 6 0 , 2 3 7 , 2 $ 2 0 5 , 1 3 3 $ 7 5 0 , 0 6 2 $ 0 5 0 , 3 $ 5 0 0 , 2 7 4 , 2 $ 2 5 4 , 8 2 3 $ 2 6 7 , 3 8 7 $ a p S & l e t o H y e l l a V a p a N t t o i r r a M A C , y e l l a V a p a N t r o p r i A o c s i c n a r F n a S t t o i r r a M s e n i o M s e D t s e W t t o i r r a M A I , s e n i o M s e D A C , o c s i c n a r F n a S t n o r f r e t a W & l e t o H y a w r e t a W s d n a l d o o W t t o i r r a M r e t n e C n o i t n e v n o C X T , s d n a l d o o W & l e t o H y l r e v a W a t n a l t A e c n a s s i a n e R l e t o H n i t s u A e c n a s s i a n e R X T , n i t s u A r e t n e C n o i t n e v n o C A G , a t n a l t A r o b r a H r e n n I e r o m i t l a B n n I e c n e d i s e R D M , e r o m i t l a B e g d i r b m a C n o t s o B n n I e c n e d i s e R A M , e g d i r b m a C r e t n e C y t i C r e v n e D n n I e c n e d i s e R a i r e l l a G e h t t a n o t s u o H s k a O n i t s e W n o t s u o H a i r e l l a G n i t s e W X T , n o t s u o H l e t o H e c a l P r e v i R R O , d n a l t r o P O C , r e v n e D X T , n o t s u o H s l a t o T : s e t o N t a d e t a l p m e t n o c e r e w h c i h w n o i t i s i u q c a o t t n e u q e s b u s d e r r u c n i s t n u o m a g n i d u l c n i , y t r e p o r p e h t f o e c i r p e s a h c r u p l a n i g i r o e h t s t n e s e r p e r y n a p m o C e h t o t t s o c l a i t i n i e h T ) A ( . d e r i u q c a s a w y t r e p o r p e h t e m i t e h t . ) d e t i d u a n u ( n o i l l i m 7 5 1 , 3 $ y l e t a m i x o r p p a s a w s e s o p r u p x a t e m o c n i l a r e d e f r o f 6 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D t a d e n w o e t a t s e l a e r f o t s o c e t a g e r g g a e h T ) B ( 4 4 - F . C N I , S T R O S E R & S L E T O H A I N E X I I I e l u d e h c S n o i t a i c e r p e D d e t a l u m u c c A d n a e t a t s E l a e R ) s d n a s u o h t n i s t n u o m a r a l l o D ( 6 1 0 2 , 1 3 r e b m e c e D , s e i t r e p o r p t n e m t s e v n i h t i w d e t a i c o s s a s t s o c e l b i g n a t l a n o i t i d d a s a l l e w s a s t n e m e e r g a e s a e l r e t s a m r e d n u s t n e m y a p s e d u l c n i n o i t i s i u q c a o t t n e u q e s b u s d e z i l a t i p a c t s o C ) C ( . s i s a b e h t n i n o i t c u d e r a s a d e d r o c e r e r a s e g r a h c t n e m r i a p m I . e c a p s t n a n e t f o t u o - n r a e y n a g n i d u l c n i — 2 2 0 , 8 7 1 9 8 4 , 8 4 ) 7 1 3 , 3 5 ( — 0 4 6 , 0 5 8 7 3 , 5 7 8 3 1 , 5 4 2 ) 5 6 2 , 1 4 1 ( ) 2 6 8 , 6 5 ( — — 5 8 0 , 4 1 1 9 1 9 , 7 5 ) 9 2 4 , 0 3 3 ( 4 1 0 2 5 1 0 2 6 1 0 2 6 6 7 , 5 7 8 , 2 $ 0 6 9 , 8 4 0 , 3 $ 9 8 9 , 1 2 2 , 3 $ 0 6 9 , 8 4 0 , 3 $ 9 8 9 , 1 2 2 , 3 $ 4 6 5 , 3 6 0 , 3 $ t n e m p o l e v e d r e d n u s e i t r e p o r p f o s e s s a l c e R e l a s r o f d l e h s a d e i f i s s a l c s e i t r e p o r P s f f o - e t i r w d n a s l a s o p s i D 1 3 r e b m e c e D t a e c n a l a B 1 y r a u n a J t a e c n a l a B s n o i t i s i u q c A s t n e m e v o r p m i l a t i p a C : ) e l a s r o f d l e h s a d e i f i s s a l c s t e s s a f o s n o i t a r e p o d n a s n o i t a r e p o g n i u n i t n o c s e d u l c n i ( d e n w o e t a t s e l a e r f o n o i t a i l i c n o c e R ) D ( : ) e l a s r o f d l e h s a d e i f i s s a l c s t e s s a f o s n o i t a r e p o d n a s n o i t a r e p o g n i u n i t n o c s e d u l c n i ( n o i t a i c e r p e d d e t a l u m u c c a f o n o i t a i l i c n o c e R ) E ( e s a e l e h t f o e f i L s r a e y 5 1 - 5 s r a e y 0 3 4 1 0 2 5 1 0 2 6 1 0 2 0 1 5 , 6 7 3 6 7 4 , 7 3 1 — — ) 0 0 0 , 8 ( 3 9 8 , 1 0 3 5 , 2 4 1 ) 3 5 3 , 2 2 ( ) 1 7 7 , 7 4 ( — — 2 1 2 , 3 4 1 ) 2 2 5 , 3 0 1 ( $ 6 8 9 , 5 0 5 $ 5 8 2 , 0 8 5 $ 6 8 9 , 5 0 5 $ 5 8 2 , 0 8 5 $ 5 7 9 , 9 1 6 $ 5 4 - F : s e v i l d e t a m i t s e g n i w o l l o f e h t n o p u d e s a b d e t u p m o c s i n o i t a i c e r p e D ) F ( e l a s r o f d l e h s a d e i f i s s a l c s e i t r e p o r p , n o i t a i c e r p e d d e t a l u m u c c A e l a s r o f d l e h s a d e i f i s s a l c s e i t r e p o r p , e s n e p x e n o i t a i c e r p e D s n o i t a r e p o g n i u n i t n o c , e s n e p x e n o i t a i c e r p e D 1 y r a u n a J t a e c n a l a B s f f o - e t i r w d n a s l a s o p s i D 1 3 r e b m e c e D t a e c n a l a B t n e m p i u q e & s e r u t x i f , e r u t i n r u F s t n e m e v o r p m i d n a s g n i d l i u B s t n e m e v o r p m i t n a n e T [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] CORPORATE ADDRESS Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 200 S. Orange Avenue Suite 2700 Orlando, Florida 32801 Xenia Investor Services: (844) 248-2205 Phone: (407) 246-8100 Fax: (866) 748-7101 (cid:9)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:134)(cid:134)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:136)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:143)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:976)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:139)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:134)(cid:145)(cid:133)(cid:151)(cid:143)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:149)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:146)(cid:142)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:152)(cid:139)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:150)(cid:3) our website at www.xeniareit.com ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING The annual meeting of stockholders is scheduled for Tuesday, May 23rd in Orlando, Florida. STOCK LISTING Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “XHR”. TRANSFER AGENT DST Systems, Inc. 430 West 7th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 Phone: (844) 248-2205 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS KPMG US LLP Orlando, Florida LEGAL COUNSEL Latham & Watkins LLP Chicago, Illinois BOARD OF DIRECTORS Jeffrey H. Donahue Non-Executive Chairman of the Board Xenia Hotels and Resorts, Inc. Chairman Welltower, Inc. John H. Alschuler Chairman HR&A Advisors, Inc. Keith E. Bass (cid:9)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:143)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:138)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:8)(cid:154)(cid:135)(cid:133)(cid:151)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:136)(cid:980)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:148) WCI Communities, Inc. Thomas M. Gartland Former President, North America Avis Budget Group, Inc. Beverly K. Goulet (cid:8)(cid:154)(cid:135)(cid:133)(cid:151)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:25)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:138)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:12)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:135)(cid:137)(cid:148)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:144)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:136)(cid:980)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:148) American Airlines Group, Inc. Mary Beth McCormick Director EastGroup Properties, Inc. Dennis D. Oklak Executive Chairman Duke Realty Corporation Marcel Verbaas (cid:19)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:138)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:8)(cid:154)(cid:135)(cid:133)(cid:151)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:136)(cid:980)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:148) Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Marcel Verbaas (cid:19)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:138)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:8)(cid:154)(cid:135)(cid:133)(cid:151)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:136)(cid:980)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:148) Barry A.N. Bloom (cid:8)(cid:154)(cid:135)(cid:133)(cid:151)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:25)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:138)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:146)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:131)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:137)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:136)(cid:980)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:148) Atish Shah (cid:8)(cid:154)(cid:135)(cid:133)(cid:151)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:25)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:481)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:138)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:133)(cid:139)(cid:131)(cid:142)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:136)(cid:980)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:23)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:131)(cid:149)(cid:151)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:148) Philip A. Wade (cid:22)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:25)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:138)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:12)(cid:144)(cid:152)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:150)(cid:143)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:136)(cid:980)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:148) Joseph T. Johnson (cid:22)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:139)(cid:145)(cid:148)(cid:3)(cid:25)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:148)(cid:135)(cid:149)(cid:139)(cid:134)(cid:135)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:3)(cid:131)(cid:144)(cid:134)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:138)(cid:139)(cid:135)(cid:136)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:133)(cid:133)(cid:145)(cid:151)(cid:144)(cid:150)(cid:139)(cid:144)(cid:137)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:136)(cid:980)(cid:139)(cid:133)(cid:135)(cid:148) Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 2016 Annual Report
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above