Ørsted Annual report 2020 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Contents Our vision Let’s create a world that runs entirely on green energy In 2021, we were ranked the most sustainable energy company in the world in the Corporate Knights Global 100 Index Ørsted Annual report 2020 Contents Contents Ørsted Remuneration report 2020 Ørsted ESG performance report 2020 A sustainable build-out of green energy Sustainability report 2020 Other reports 2020 Remuneration ESG performance Sustainability Management’s review Financial statements Consolidated financial statements Income statement Statement of comprehensive income Balance sheet Statement of changes in equity Statement of cash flows Notes Consolidated ESG statements (additional information) Basis of reporting Environment Social and governance Parent company financial statements Income statement Balance sheet Statement of changes in equity Notes Management’s statement, auditor’s reports, and glossary Statement by the Executive Board and the Board of Directors Independent auditor’s reports Limited assurance report on the consolidated ESG statements Glossary Overview Chairman’s statement CEO’s review Performance highlights Financial outlook Financial outlook 2021 Financial estimates and policies Our business A catalyst for change Our strategic aspiration and growth platform Our markets and strategy Our capital allocation and funding Our strategic enablers Our business model Our strategic targets Our global footprint Results Results Five-year summary Fourth quarter Quarterly summary, 2019-2020 Business units Our business units Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Governance Message from the Chairman Corporate governance Board of Directors The Executive Committee Risk and risk management Shareholder information 4 5 7 12 14 15 17 18 19 22 23 29 30 32 33 35 38 39 43 44 46 47 48 49 54 57 61 62 63 65 69 70 74 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 168 169 170 172 175 176 176 177 178 185 186 187 191 192 3 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Contents Overview 5 Chairman’s statement 7 CEO’s review 12 Performance highlights Our newly-built operations hub in Vlissingen in the Dutch province of Zeeland is the base for our first offshore wind farm in the Netherlands, Borssele 1 & 2. As well as hiring staff locally where possible, we work closely with nearby schools, libraries, and museums to inspire the next generation of wind turbine technicians. Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Overview Contents Chairman’s statement Enabling the world’s green transformation The decisions our global society takes today, and in the next few years, determine whether we pass a habitable planet on to future gen- erations. Science recommends that we halve global carbon emissions by 2030 to have a chance of limiting the temperature rise to 1.5˚ C and mitigating the risk of irreversible tipping points in our global ecosystems. In 2020, we saw progress. Many governments raised their carbon emission reduction targets and further reinforced their build-out plans for renewable energy production capacity. Several large companies also set targets for their decarbonisation and acted firmly to make their business models more sustainable. Targets and actions by both governments and corporations bode well for our planet, but to limit the increase in temperature to 1.5 ˚ C, even more decisive action is needed. Our target is to become a fully carbon-neutral company by 2025. In 2020, we continued the build-out of our green power generation capacity both onshore and offshore. We also initiated a range of renewable hydrogen projects. Renewable hydrogen will enable sectors like cement, ammonia, heavy road transport, aviation, and shipping to transition to fossil-free energy. Like it was for offshore wind, innovation and industrialisation in renewable hydrogen are required to bring down costs, making the new green fuels competitive. This year, we divested our downstream retail customer and power distribution businesses, which marks another big step in the renew- able energy transformation. Our vision is a world that runs entirely on green energy. Ørsted wants to partner with countries and companies, helping them to leave fossil fuels behind, and in 2020, we saw a breakthrough for comprehensive long-term green power purchase agreements. The COVID-19 pandemic affected everybody in 2020. We are a safety-first company, and during the pandemic, our priority has been the health and well-being of our employees, their families, and the communities which we are a part of. Thanks to our careful and talented staff, Ørsted’s operations have remained stable, and our development and construction projects have moved forward according to plan during the pandemic. All employees have adapted impressively to new routines and pushed through with projects, despite sudden and unforeseen obstacles. We will continue to closely follow the situation in the markets where we operate and will continue adhering to national guidelines and regulations to help minimise the spread of the pandemic and keep our employees and partners safe. Our company is stronger than ever and – even more important – has developed a promising platform for continued growth. Even in this time of significantly increased global uncertainty, Ørsted’s business model has demonstrated its resilience. We were able to raise our financial guidance in March and maintained it throughout the year. EBITDA for the year amounted to DKK 18.1 billion, thereby exceeding our expectations and resulting in a ROCE of 10 %. Profit for the year amounted to DKK 16.7 billion, significantly impacted by the gain from divestment of our power distribution activities. The Board of Directors recommends paying a dividend of DKK 11.5 per share, corresponding to DKK 4.8 billion. On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to thank the employees and management of Ørsted for an outstanding effort during a period of global uncertainty and for keeping us on track towards creating a world that runs entirely on green energy. I would also like to express special thanks to former CEO Henrik Poulsen for his exemplary leadership in the past eight years during which Ørsted was transformed completely from a financially challenged, regional, fossil-based energy company to a highly profitable global leader in renewable energy. With Mads Nipper on board as our new CEO from this January, we remain as committed as ever to staying at the forefront of the global energy transformation and to offering cost- effective green energy solutions and enabling governments and companies to power the world with green energy. Thomas Thune Andersen Chairman 5 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Contents “ We are very satisfied with our strategic progress and results in 2020, and I am grateful for the support and professionalism of our customers and partners. I am keenly aware that only together, we can do great things and live up to our high ambitions. We maintain a leading position in a global high-growth market and have built a strong and financially sustainable pipeline, laying the path for future growth. Mads Nipper CEO Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Overview Contents CEO’s review 2020 showed very strong results, both operationally and financially. Although the world is in the midst of a global pandemic crisis, our business model has proved resilient. 2020 also showed great strategic progress. Highlights 2020 Financials Operating profit (EBITDA) increased by 4 % to DKK 18.1 billion. EBITDA from offshore and onshore wind farms in operation increased by 14 % to DKK 16.9 billion. Financial results In 2020, our operating profit (EBITDA) amounted to DKK 18.1 billion, a 4 % increase compared to last year. Earnings from our offshore and onshore wind farms in operation increased by 14 %. This was driven by ramp-up of green power generation from Hornsea 1, Borssele 1 & 2, Lockett, Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek and receipt of CfDs of another 400 MW of Hornsea 1 from April. Futhermore, we had higher wind speeds in 2020. These positive effects were partly offset by lower earnings from trading related to hedging of our power exposures, which gener- ated very high earnings in 2019, and adverse COVID-19 related impacts. The latter mainly manifested itself in the UK power prices due to a lower demand for electricity. This led to higher balancing tariffs (BSUoS) from National Grid and lower ROC recycle prices. Further- more, we saw hours with negative prices in the UK from April to July. We are on track to meet our target of an average yearly increase in EBITDA from offshore and onshore wind farms and solar farms in operation of 20 % from 2017 to 2023. ROCE was 10 %. Operations Stable operations throughout the year despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Green share of heat and power genera- tion increased from 86 % to 90 %. Borssele 1 & 2, our first Dutch offshore wind farm, was commissioned. The onshore wind farms Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek were successfully commissioned. Our Renescience plant in the UK was commissioned. Business development Signed agreements to farm-down 50 % of the offshore wind farms Greater Changhua 1 and 25 % of Ocean Wind 1. The divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses resulted in proceeds of DKK 20.5 billion with a gain of DKK 10.9 billion which will be deployed into our global renewable energy build-out plan. Our green share of heat and power generation continued to increase and reached a new high of 90 %. Return on capital employed (ROCE) was 10 % for 2020, in line with our target. COVID-19 Since the outbreak of COVID-19, our Corporate Crisis Management Organisation (CCMO) has met regularly, focusing on the health and safety of our employees and on ensuring business continuity. During 2020, we had 146 confirmed infected colleagues and fortunately no casualties from COVID-19. We continue to do our utmost to keep our colleagues safe across our locations. Our asset base has been fully operational, and we maintained normal availability rates at our offshore and onshore Signed corporate power purchase agreements (CPPAs) with TSMC for our offshore wind project Greater Changhua 2b & 4 in Taiwan and with Amazon for Borkum Riffgrund 3 in Germany. The first being the largest- ever renewable energy CPPA. We took FID on the onshore wind farm Western Trail and the Old 300 Solar Center in Texas. We acquired and took FID on the solar project Muscle Shoals in Alabama and the onshore wind project Haystack in Nebraska. We secured funding for three renewable hydrogen projects, one in the UK, one in Germany, and a joint project consortium in the EU. We also entered into three additional renewable hydrogen partner- ships in the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany, respectively. We divested the Danish power distribu- tion, residential customer, and city light businesses which resulted in a gain of DKK 10.9 billion. The divestment of our LNG business was completed, and an agreement to divest our B2B business in the UK was signed. 7 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Overview Contents wind farms and CHP plants throughout 2020. Construction of our projects largely pro- gressed according to plan, both in Europe, Asia Pacific, and the US. The construction project most affected by COVID-19 was the offshore wind farm Hornsea 2, due to delays in the offshore topside construction at a shipyard in Singapore which was temporarily closed. However, we do not expect the delay to affect the commissioning date. Offshore 2020 was a good year for our offshore business with many significant milestones and achievements, although with some headwind in the US. In December, we commissioned the 752 MW Dutch wind farm Borssele 1 & 2 on schedule and within budget. The wind farm deploys 94 Siemens Gamesa 8 MW wind turbines, making it the largest-ever built in the Netherlands, and will supply renewable energy to 1 million house- holds. During the construction of Borssele 1 & 2, we passed a significant milestone by installing Ørsted’s offshore wind turbine number 1,500. We are installing foundations at our 1,386 MW offshore wind project Hornsea 2 in the UK. At our 900 MW offshore wind project Greater Changhua 1 & 2a in Taiwan, we are preparing for installation of foundations which will commence in the first quarter of 2021. Both wind farms are expected to be commissioned in 2022 and will become the largest offshore wind farms in their respective regions. In North America, the 12 MW Coastal Virginia demonstration project, which we have constructed for Dominion Energy as an EPC contractor, was commissioned. The offshore wind farm is the first-ever to receive federal permits and be installed in US federal waters. In December, we signed an agreement to farm down 50 % of the 605 MW offshore wind farm Greater Changhua 1 to CDPQ, a Canadian pension fund, and Cathay PE, a Taiwanese private equity fund. The farm-down is the largest-ever renewable energy M&A transaction in Taiwan and underpins the attractiveness of our offshore wind assets in Asia Pacific. We selected Siemens Gamesa as preferred wind turbine supplier for our 900 MW Borkum Riffgrund 3 and 242 MW Gode Wind 3 projects. Subject to final investment decision, both projects will deploy 11 MW wind turbines with 200-metre rotors. In addition, we signed a 10-year corporate power purchase agreement (CPPA) with Amazon to buy 250 MW of the output from Borkum Riffgrund 3. This is our first offshore wind PPA with a global tech company and the largest offshore wind CPPA in Europe. Events in 2020 April – June July August September October November December Onshore Sage Draw, Texas, commissioned (338 MW) Onshore Plum Creek, Nebraska, commissioned (230 MW) Onshore Muscle Shoals, Alabama, acquired and FID’ed (227 MWac), expected COD in 2021 Offshore CPPA with Taiwan- based TSMC to offtake full generation from Greater Changhua 2b & 4 (920 MW) Markets & Bioenergy Divestment of Danish power distri- bution, residential customer, and city light businesses to SEAS-NVE completed Renewable hydrogen Funding secured together with part- ners for renewable hydrogen project Westküste 100 in Germany Onshore Willow Creek, South Dakota, commissioned (103 MW) Onshore Western Trail, Texas, FID’ed (367 MW), expected COD in 2021 Onshore Haystack, Nebraska, acquired and FID’ed (298 MW), expected COD in 2021 Markets & Bioenergy Renescience plant, the UK, commissioned Renewable hydrogen Collaboration with Yara on developing project to replace fossil hydrogen with renewable hydrogen in ammonia production Onshore Old 300, Texas, FiD’ed (430 MWac), expected COD in 2022 Renewable hydrogen Agreement with bp to develop a potential large- scale renewable hydrogen project in Germany Markets & Bioenergy Agreement to balance 40 % of the power generated from Dogger Bank Offshore Borssele 1 & 2, the Netherlands, commissioned (752 MW) Offshore Farm-down of 50 % of Greater Changhua 1 to CDPQ and Cathay PE signed Offshore Agreement with PSEG signed to sell 25 % of the offshore wind development project Ocean Wind 1 Offshore CPPA with Amazon to buy the output from Borkum Riffgrund 3 (250 MW) signed Markets & Bioenergy Divestment of our LNG business to Glencore Ørsted Appeal against decision from the Danish Tax Agency on Danish taxation of two offshore wind farms in the UK 8 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Overview Contents “In December, we were granted consent to move into the final development phase of the offshore wind farm Hornsea 3. In July, we signed a CPPA with Taiwan-based TSMC, the world’s largest semiconductor foundry. TSMC will offtake the full generation from our 920 MW offshore wind farm Greater Changhua 2b & 4, making it the largest-ever renewable energy CPPA. The 20-year fixed- price contract period will start once the wind farm reaches commercial operation, expect- edly in 2025 or 2026, subject to grid availabili- ty and Ørsted’s final investment decision. the offshore wind farm Hornsea 3 by the UK Secretary of State for the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. The offshore wind farm has a potential capacity of more than 2.4 GW and is adjacent to our offshore wind farms Hornsea 1 and Hornsea 2, off the East Coast of the UK. With the consent granted, the wind farm will be able to enter the next UK auction round for a contract for difference (CfD), expectedly in 2021. In December, we entered into an agreement with New Jersey’s Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) to sell a 25 % ownership interest in our 1.1 GW offshore wind development project Ocean Wind 1. The project is the first large-scale offshore wind farm in New Jersey. In March, we entered into an agreement with TEPCO to establish a joint venture company for offshore wind in Japan, with the intention of working towards a joint bid in the first Japanese auction, now expectedly this year. In December, we were granted consent to move into the final development phase of Our pipeline of US offshore development projects is moving forward, but we are still waiting for the US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) to decide on the preferred wind farm layout for the build- out of offshore wind for our north-eastern projects in our New England lease areas. Furthermore, while we are still waiting for clarity concerning the federal permitting process for our projects, there are positive signs that the bottleneck will be resolved imminently. We had expected to receive the ‘notices of intent’ (NOIs) from BOEM for our advanced-stage development projects following the release and public comment process regarding the Vineyard Wind Supple- mental Environmental Impact Study in 2020. While that did not happen, we are starting to see some promising signs of movement. The timely issuance of the draft ‘environmental impact statement’ (EIS) on 4 January 2021 for our South Fork project bodes well. So does the announcement of the ‘initiation of action notice’ (IAN) (a prelude to NOIs issuance) for the Ocean Wind 1 project. All signs from the incoming Joe Biden Administration indicate they will support a timely, predictable permit- ting regime. Revolution Wind, Ocean Wind 1, Skipjack Wind, and Sunrise Wind will likely be delayed beyond the previously expected 2023 and 2024 construction years. We have flexibility in the timeline for all four projects, and we have been able to make good progress on other project milestones in the meantime. However, until there is a clear timeline from BOEM, we cannot solidify our construction schedules. With regards to South Fork Wind, we remain comfortable with our previously communicated timeline with COD in late 2023. Despite the permitting delays, we remain confident that we can deliver our US project portfolio with satisfactory value creation, which is supported by the commitment to rapid clean energy deployment from the Joe Biden Administration, the US Treasury’s recent announcement of a 10-year continuity safe harbour for offshore wind in addition to a new 30 % ITC level for projects starting construc- tion in 2017-2025, which will help expand tax credit eligibility. We continue to see solid long- term growth and value creation potential in US offshore wind. In 2020, we made progress towards a greener future based on renewable hydrogen. We continuously pursue opportunities within industrial-scale production of renewable hydrogen, and during 2020 and early 2021, we have secured funding for three projects, one in the UK, one in Germany, and a joint consortium in the EU. We also entered into an additional three partnerships, one in Germany, one in the Netherlands, and one in Denmark. Our most recent hydrogen partnership was agreed with British energy company bp in November and will comprise a 50 MW electrolyser plant at bp’s Lingen Refinery in Germany. The plant is expected to be opera- tional in 2024 and will replace approx. 20 % of the fuel-based hydrogen from the refinery. The project is the first stage towards a long-term ambition to build a capacity of more than 500 MW of renewable hydrogen at Lingen. This would replace the entire production of fuel-based hydrogen at the refinery. Furthermore, we joined forces with Yara, the world’s leading fertiliser company, to develop a pioneering project aiming at replacing fossil hydrogen with renewable hydrogen in the production of ammonia with the potential to abate more than 100,000 tonnes of CO2 per year. Onshore In 2020, we saw strong traction in our Onshore business, underpinned by the commissioning of three new wind farms, the acquisitions of two late-stage projects, and the decision to 9 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Overview Contents construct another onshore wind farm and a solar farm. During the year, we successfully commissioned the three US onshore wind farms Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek, located in Texas, Nebraska, and South Dakota, respectively. In July, we acquired the 227 MWac solar project Muscle Shoals in Alabama, US. The project is expected to be commissioned in Q3 this year and will become the largest solar energy asset in the south-eastern US. The project is eligible for 30 % ITC and has a fully contracted 20-year utility PPA. The project further diver- sifies the geographic footprint of our asset base by establishing a foothold in the rapidly growing south-eastern solar market. In September, we took final investment deci- sion on constructing the onshore wind farm Western Trail in Texas. This greenfield project has a capacity of 367 MW and is eligible for 100 % PTC when commissioned, expectedly during Q3 this year. In October, we acquired the late-stage 298 MW onshore development project Haystack. The wind project is located very close to our onshore wind farm Plum Creek in Nebraska, also residing in the South-West Power Pool (SPP) area. With the acquisition, we further expanded our footprint into this market which will play an important part in our growth in North America and diversify our portfolio. In November, we also took final investment decision on constructing the Old 300 Solar Center which is a 430 MWac solar project also located in Texas with 30 % ITC eligibility. We expect Old 300 to be commissioned during Q2 2022. some of our strategic long-term partners and customers to whom we deliver risk manage- ment products. We expect the transaction to close in Q1 2021. In addition, we are currently constructing the combined solar (420 MWac) and storage (40 MWac) project Permian Energy Center in Texas, US. The project is progressing according to plan, and we expect Permian to be commis- sioned by mid-2021 with 30 % ITC eligibility. With the completion of Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek and the addition of Muscle Shoals, Western Trail, Haystack, and Old 300 Solar Center, we now have 3.4 GW of combined onshore wind and solar PV in operation or under construction, and we remain very satisfied with the expansion of our onshore business. Markets & Bioenergy During 2020, we continued streamlining our Markets & Bioenergy business. In August, we completed the divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses to SEAS- NVE (now Andel). The divestment marks an important strategic milestone for Ørsted, and the proceeds will be deployed into our global renewable energy build-out plan. In December, we completed the divestment of our LNG activities to Glencore, and in September, we signed an agreement to divest the vast majority of our UK B2B customer portfolio to Total Gas & Power. We will keep In November, we signed a 15-year route-to- market agreement with SSE Renewables and Equinor to balance power generation from their offshore wind farm Dogger Bank in the UK. The contract is the largest balancing agreement won in a competitive tender process in the UK market. Under the agreement, Ørsted will be responsible for trading and balancing 40 % of the 960 MW generated from the first two phases of the wind farm, when completed in 2026. The agreement will add further scale to our portfolio and underlines our position as a leading green energy trading company in the UK. In mid-October, the Renescience waste- recycling plant in Northwich, the UK, was successfully commissioned after passing the final performance test. With the commis- sioning of Renescience Northwich, we reached another important milestone. We will continue to monitor the plant’s performance, while exploring the broader commercial potential of this recycling technology. In March, the Copenhagen Maritime & Com- mercial Court decided to close the action for damages, ruling in Ørsted’s favour. The action related to a claimed abuse of a dominant po- sition on the market for wholesale of physical electricity in western Denmark from 2003 to 2006. However, the action will continue in 2021 as the claimants have decided to appeal the case to the Danish Western High Court. Borssele 1 & 2, near Vlissingen, the Netherlands. 10 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Overview Contents Other significant events In 2018, seven bearers of the Ørsted name filed a subpoena to prevent our use of the name. In May 2019, the Copenhagen Maritime & Commercial Court ruled in favour of Ørsted. Following the ruling, the plaintiffs decided to appeal the case. In November 2020, the Danish Supreme Court also ruled in favour of Ørsted, and the case is now closed. We are very pleased that the ruling of the Supreme Court upholds our right to use the Ørsted name. It was chosen as a tribute to Hans Christian Ørsted, one of the greatest Danish scientists of all time. He discovered electromagnetism 200 years ago and thus laid the foundation for how we produce electricity. In December, we received an administrative decision from the Danish Tax Agency requiring Danish taxation of our British offshore wind farms Walney Extension and Hornsea 1. The claim amounted to DKK 5.1 billion, plus inter- est, in addition to the taxes we have already paid in Denmark. According to the decision, Ørsted is to be taxed in Denmark on the full future value of the two offshore wind farms, despite the fact that they are developed, owned, and operated by British subsidiaries of the Ørsted group and are taxed in the UK. We disagree with the decision which in our view is based on a misconception of the risks and value creation in our business model for developing, constructing, and operating offshore wind farms and have appealed it to the Danish Tax Appeals Agency. Furthermore, we have taken steps to ensure that the Danish and UK tax authorities initiate negotiations to avoid Ørsted being subjected to double taxation, if necessary, by referring the case to an independent arbitration panel. under the leadership of Martin Neubert who will become CCO, Deputy CEO, and member of the Executive Board. Employees Our talented people remain the most impor- tant assets in Ørsted, and on behalf of the Executive Committee, I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge and thank all our employees for the great job they have been doing throughout the year, including how they have all adapted to the new challenges in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is very important for us to attract, develop, and retain the best talent, and we strongly believe in the value of a diverse workforce. We aspire to create an environment where everyone, whatever their personal back- ground, can thrive, perform, and grow. Therefore, we were also pleased to see that the 2020 employee satisfaction survey, People Matter, showed a record-high satis- faction and motivation score of 78 out of 100, placing Ørsted in the top 10 % of our external benchmark. New corporate structure On 28 January, we announced a change to our organisational structure which will take effect from 4 February. The change entails moving from a business unit structure to a more functional structure where the commercially focused functions from the current business units Offshore and Markets & Bioenergy will be brought together The operationally focused functions will be brought together under a new COO as Anders Lindberg has decided to take on a new position outside Ørsted. The COO will report to Mads Nipper. As a consequence of the new corporate struc- ture, Morten H. Buchgreitz has decided to leave the company. Both Anders and Morten have done a tremendous job during their tenure in Ørsted, and we owe them great gratitude. Onshore will remain a separate business unit. The Onshore business differs from the rest of Ørsted when it comes to technological maturity and business model, and we believe that Onshore will be best positioned to realise its full potential as a separate business unit. We are making these changes in our organisation to establish an even stronger customer and market focus, to further strengthen the focus on EPC and operations, and to support the scaling of our organisation as we continue our strong growth trajectory in the years to come. Externally, we will continue to report Offshore and Onshore financials as we do today. This means that Offshore will continue to include our hydrogen activities. Bioenergy, our legacy gas activities, and Renescience will be reported in a separate segment called Bioenergy & Other. Concluding remarks from the new CEO We are very satisfied with our strategic pro- gress and results in 2020, and I am grateful for the support and professionalism of our custom- ers and partners. I am keenly aware that only together, we can do great things and live up to our high ambitions. We maintain a leading position in a global high-growth market and have built a strong and financially sustainable pipeline, laying the path for future growth. I am proud of and humbled by the Board of Directors’ trust in me to succeed Henrik Poulsen as CEO of Ørsted. Creating a world that runs entirely on green energy is a vision close to my heart. I also want to thank the Executive Committee and all Ørsted employees for a warm welcome. I am deeply impressed and inspired by the passion and motivation I have encountered throughout the entire company, and it makes me excited for what we can achieve. I am con- fident that Ørsted can stay a globally leading renewable energy producer, both offshore and onshore. I am convinced that Ørsted, as the world’s most sustainable energy company, has the potential to be a global catalyst for sys- temic change, accelerating the green energy transition and how companies operate. Mads Nipper Group President and CEO 11 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Overview Contents Performance highlights Profits and returns Operating profit (EBITDA) DKKbn New partnerships 30.0 Follow-up on outlook announced for 2020 Return on capital employed (ROCE) % 32 EBITDA, excl. new partnerships, realised versus guidance, DKKbn 16.7 New partnerships 30 January Profit for the year (continuing operations) DKKbn New partnerships RBC divestment 19.5 18.1 17.5 18.1 2018 2019 2020 16.7 6.1 2018 2019 2020 10 11 10 4 March 2018 2019 2020 Realised In 2020, we maintained stable operations despite the pandemic and achieved an underlying EBITDA exceeding our expectations at the beginning of the year. This was mainly driven by an increase in generation from our offshore and onshore wind farms. Profit for the year was DKK 16.7 billion. The significant increase compared to 2019 was due to the divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses (RBC), resulting in a gain of DKK 10.9 billion. ROCE was 10 % for the year, which was in line with our target of an average ROCE of approx. 10 % for the Group in the period 2019-2025. In 2018, ROCE was significantly impacted by the 50 % farm-down of Hornsea 1. Cash flow and balance sheet Gross investments DKKbn 27.0 24.5 23.3 Interest-bearing net debt DKKbn 17.2 Credit metric (FFO/adjusted net debt1) % 69 12.3 48 31 27.0 2018 2019 2020 12.3 -2.2 2018 2019 2020 48 2018 2019 2020 The gross investments reached DKK 27.0 billion, a record-high level, driven by an increase in our construction activity, both offshore and onshore. Gross investments are slightly below our guidance, mainly due to timing across years. Our net debt decreased to DKK 12.3 billion, mainly due to the divestment of our Danish power distribu- tion, residential customer, and city light businesses, resulting in proceeds of DKK 20.5 billion. The credit metric ‘funds from operations’ (FFO) relative to adjusted net debt amounted to 48 % in 2020, well above our target of around 30 %. Investments, realised versus guidance DKKbn 30 January 28 August Realised 30-32 28-30 27.0 In the outlook announced in our annual report for 2019, we expected EBITDA excluding new partnerships of DKK 15-16 billion and gross investments of DKK 30-32 billion for 2020. With EBITDA excluding new partnerships of DKK 18.1 billion, we exeeded our expectations. Gross investments amounted to DKK 27.0 billion. 1 Interest-bearing net debt, including 50 % of hybrid capital and securities not available for use (with the exception of repo transactions), present value of lease obligations (up until 2018), and decommissioning obligations less deferred tax. 12 / 193 15-16 16-17 18.1 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Overview Contents Performance highlights Environment Green share of generation % Installed renewable capacity GW Avoided emissions from green capacity Million tonnes, CO2e Greenhouse gas emissions, scopes 1 and 2 Million tonnes, CO2e 86 90 75 90 2018 2019 2020 The green share of our heat and power generation continued to increase to a new high of 90 %, following continued ramp-up of our offshore and onshore wind capacity and lower heat and power generation based on fossil fuels. 11.3 11.3 9.9 8.3 2018 2019 2020 13.1 13.1 11.3 8.1 2018 2019 2020 Installed green capacity increased by 14 % to 11.3 GW in 2020 due to the commissioning of the offshore wind farm Borssele 1 & 2 and the three onshore wind farms Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek. Avoided emissions from our green heat and power generation relative to fossil-fuelled generation increased by 16 %, mainly due to increased wind- based power generation. Greenhouse gas emissions, scope 3 Million tonnes, CO2e Safety Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Employee satisfaction Index 1-100 Social 36.2 34.6 25.3 1.9 3.5 1.9 1.9 2018 2019 2020 The scopes 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions were at the same level as in 2019 despite lower fossil- fuelled heat and power generation. This was due to an increase from ancillary services from our coal- fuelled units as we are legally obliged to deliver these services with the lowest marginal costs. Governance Board of Directors and the Executive Committee Nationality and gender diversity 25.3 2018 2019 2020 3.6 4.7 4.9 3.6 2018 2019 2020 78 76 77 78 9 6 6 7 11 4 6 7 9 4 9 4 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 Our scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions were reduced by 27 %, mainly due to reduced sales of natural gas. We continue to have a strong focus on the safety and well-being of our employees. We are progress- ing satisfactorily towards our target of 2.9 by 2025. The 2020 employee satisfaction survey, People Matter, showed a record-high satisfaction and motivation score of 78. We continue to have strong focus on increasing diversity at all management levels. Danish Non-Danish Male Female 13 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Contents Contents Financial outlook 15 Financial outlook 2021 17 Financial estimates and policies We made history in North America in 2020 when we built the first-ever offshore wind farm in US federal waters as EPC contractor. The two wind turbines form the offshore wind farm Coastal Virginia Wind, a pilot project located 43 miles off the coast of Virginia Beach. The experience gained here paves the way for an expansion in the offshore wind industry in the US. Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Financial outlook Contents Financial outlook 2021 Group EBITDA guidance As in previous years, our EBITDA guidance does not include earnings from new partner- ship agreements as it is difficult to predict the exact timing of potential farm-downs as well as the distribution of income between years if the partnership includes a construction agreement. In terms of new partnerships in 2021, we expect to close the 50 % farm-down of Greater Changhua 1 following the agreement announced in December 2020. Furthermore, we plan to farm-down a 50 % share of Borssele 1 & 2 around summer. Finally, we will explore the possibility of a farm-down of our solar PV portfolio following the commissioning of Muscle Shoals in Q3. While we have not included any gains from these farm-downs in our guidance, we have assumed a derived reduction in site earnings. We had no earnings from new partner- ship agreements in 2020, while EBITDA from existing partnerships amounted to DKK 1.6 billion. In 2021, EBITDA from existing partnerships is expected to be close to zero. In 2020, we divested our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses. These contributed with DKK 0.9 billion to our EBITDA in 2020. Operating profit (EBITDA), excluding new partnership agreements, is expected to be DKK 15-16 billion in 2021. The outlook is based on the expected development in the business units compared to 2020, as described below. Offshore (excluding new partnership agreements) – lower Earnings in Offshore (excluding new partner- ship agreements) are expected to be lower EBITDA development 2020-2021 DKKbn 18.1 -0.9 -1.6 15.6 1.1 15-16 2020 realised (business performance) Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses Existing Offshore partnerships 2020 comparable (business performance) Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy IFRS 9 one-off effects 2021 guidance (IFRS) Excl. IFRS 9 one-off effects Outlook 2021, DKKbn EBITDA Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Gross investments 2020 realised1 2020 realised excl. RBC1 2 2021 guidance3 18.1 14.8 1.1 2.1 27.0 17.2 14.8 1.1 1.2 15-16 Lower Higher Lower 32-34 Our EBITDA guidance for the Group is the prevailing guidance, whereas the directional earnings development per business unit serve as a means to support this. Higher and lower indicates the direction of the business unit’s earnings relative to the results for 2020. 1 Business performance principle. 2 Excluding the Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses (RBC). 3 Excluding new partnerships, relative to 2020, excluding RBC. than in 2020. Earnings are also expected to be lower than in 2020 adjusted for the net effect of the non-repetition of earnings from existing partnerships in 2020 (DKK 1.6 billion) and the positive effect (DKK 1.1 billion) of ceasing to report according to the business performance principle in 2021 (see page 16). We do not expect any further adverse COVID-19-related impacts on earnings relative to 2020. The positive impact on operational earnings in 2021 driven by the last 400 MW of Hornsea 1 receiving CfDs from April and full-year effects from Borssele 1 & 2 net of the reduction in site earnings from the assumed farm-down will be more than offset by a number of adverse effects: – In 2020, earnings from sites were positively affected by high winds speeds where the year ended at 9.7 m/s, above a normal level of 9.3 m/s and above our expectations for 2021 of 9.3 m/s. – TNUoS tariffs are expected to increase following the divestment of the offshore transmission assets at Walney Extension in mid-2020 and Hornsea 1, expectedly in H1 2021. – Earnings from Horns Rev 2 will de- crease as the subsidy period ended in October 2020. – We are in the construction phase of the two large offshore wind farms Hornsea 2 and Greater Changhua 1 & 2a, both of which are expected to be commissioned in 2022. In 2021, we will incur OPEX on these sites as they are preparing for operations, but we do not expect any ramp-up generation. 15 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Financial outlook Contents Expensed project development costs amount- ed to DKK 1.7 billion in 2020. For 2021, we expect expensed project development costs to be approx. DKK 2.0 billion as a natural consequence of our continued expansion of our footprint. Onshore – higher Earnings from onshore wind and solar farms in operation are expected to increase from ramp-up of generation at Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek (commissioned during 2020) and due to expected commis- sioning of the new wind farms Western Trail and Haystack, and the solar farms Permian Energy Center and Muscle Shoals during 2021. The latter being net of the assumed reduction in site earnings from the possible farm-down of our solar PV portfolio. The increased operational earnings will be partly offset by higher costs related to the strategic expansion of the business and an adverse year-on-year impact from recognition of derivatives. Markets & Bioenergy – lower Our directional guidance for Markets & Bioenergy for 2021 is based on earnings in 2020, excluding the divested Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses. These contributed with DKK 0.9 billion to our EBITDA in 2020. Earnings in ‘Gas Markets & Infrastructure’ are expected to be lower than 2020, mainly because the positive effects from revaluation of gas at storage caused by the increasing gas prices, especially during Q4 2020, is expected to partly reverse in 2021. Earnings from our CHP plants (including ancillary services) are expected to be in line with 2020. Gross investments Gross investments for 2021 are expected to amount to DKK 32-34 billion. The outlook reflects a high level of activity in Offshore (Hornsea 2, Greater Changhua 1 & 2a, and our US activities), and Onshore (Western Trail, Haystack, Permian Energy Center, and Old 300 Solar Center). At the end of 2020, the value of our business performance hedges deferred to a future period amounted to DKK -2.7 billion. This net loss has already been recognised in the income statement under IFRS, as we have not previously applied hedge accounting for these. Consequently, for the period 2021-2025, EBITDA (according to IFRS) will be higher with a similar amount compared to what the busi- ness performance EBITDA would have been in the same period if we had continued to report based on this principle. In addition to gross investments, significant funds are temporarily tied up in the construction of transmission assets for offshore wind farms in the UK and offshore wind farms for our partners. These funds are a part of our operating cash flow. At the end of 2020, funds tied up in work in progress totalled DKK 9.8 billion. During H1 2021, we expect to divest the Hornsea 1 offshore transmission asset, but we still expect to see a high level of funds tied up in work in progress in 2021 as a result of the continued construction of the transmission assets at Hornsea 2. We expect to divest the Hornsea 2 offshore transmission assets in 2023. For 2021, EBITDA according to IFRS is expected to be DKK 1.1 billion higher than what we would have expected if we had kept reporting according to the business performance princi- ple. The main part of the amount is related to site EBITDA in Offshore. This effect is included in our directional guidance described above. In the management’s review, part of our interim and annual reports in 2021, we will use business performance as comparable numbers for 2020 for a better like-for-like comparison, while our consolidated financial statements will be reported after IFRS only. Ceasing the use of business performance in 2021 With the implementation of IFRS 9 in 2018, it has become significantly easier to apply IFRS hedge accounting to our commodity hedges. We have concluded that IFRS 9 can replace our business performance principle, and therefore, we will be reporting based on IFRS only from 1 January 2021. This will simplify our reporting and avoid potential conflicts with future reporting requirements for alternative performance measures. Read more in notes 1.4 and 1.6 on pages 88 and 90, respectively. Uncertainties, prices, and hedges Our offshore wind farms are largely subject to regulated prices, implying a high degree of revenue certainty. This means that we know the price per generated MWh for most wind farms in Denmark and Germany, our first Dutch wind farm as well as the CfD wind farms in the UK. For our British ROC wind farms, we also know the subsidy per generated MWh which we will receive in addition to the market price. The part of our generation from offshore and onshore farms and power plants which is exposed to market prices has to a large extent been hedged for 2021. The same ap- plies to our currency risks. The market value of financial hedging instruments relating to our operations and divestments of assets deferred for recognition in EBITDA amounted to DKK 0.1 billion at the end of 2020. This effect is included in the outlook for 2021 (see note 1.6). The most significant uncertainty about the operating profit from existing activities in 2021 relates to the size of our power gen- eration which depends on wind conditions, ramp-up of new wind farms, and asset availability. Forward-looking statements The annual report contains forward-looking state- ments which include projections of our short- and long-term financial performance and targets as well as our financial policies. These statements are by nature uncertain and associated with risk. Many factors may cause the actual development to differ materially from our expectations. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in temperature, wind conditions, wake and blockage effects, precipitation levels, the development in power, coal, carbon, gas, oil, currency, and interest rate markets, changes in legislation, regulations, or standards, the renegotiation of contracts, changes in the competitive environment in our markets, and reliability of supply. Read more about the risks in the chapter ‘Risk and risk management’ and in note 7. 16 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Financial outlook Contents Financial estimates and policies Financial estimates We remain well on track to deliver on our long-term financial targets. For the period 2019-2025, we expect total gross investments of approx. DKK 200 billion, of which DKK 50 billion was spent in 2019 and 2020. From 2017 to 2023, we expect an average increase in operating profit (EBITDA) from offshore and onshore wind and solar farms in operation (including O&M agreements and power purchase agreements) of 20 % annually, reaching a level of DKK 25-26 billion in 2023. The largest share of Ørsted’s operating profit (EBITDA) will be generated by long-term contract-based or regulated activities. We expect an average of around 90 % of EBITDA in the period 2019-2025 to stem from long- term contract-based or regulated activities. Our target is an average return on capital employed (ROCE) of approx. 10 % for the Group in the 2019-2025 period. Financial policies The Board of Directors recommends to the annual general meeting that a dividend of DKK 11.5 per share be paid for 2020, equating an increase of 9.5 % and a total of DKK 4.8 billion. Supported by the expected increase in cash flows from future offshore and onshore wind farms, we still intend to increase annual dividends by a high single-digit percentage compared to the previous years’ dividends, covering the period up until 2025. Our dividend policy and other expected capital allocations are subject to our commitment to our BBB+/Baa1 rating profile. Capital Markets Day 2021 On 2 June 2021, we will host a Capital Markets Day. Together with the Executive Committee, CEO Mads Nipper will present an update to our long-term strategy and financial targets. Financial estimates Total CAPEX spend Target Year DKK 200 bn 2019-2025 Average return on capital employed (ROCE) ~10 % 2019-2025 Average share of EBITDA from long-term regulated and contracted activities Average yearly increase in EBITDA from offshore and onshore wind farms and solar farms in operation ~90 % 2019-2025 ~20 % 2017-2023 Read more about our key metrics, financial targets, and policies in the presentation from our Capital Markets Day in November 2018 at orsted.com/en/ capital- markets-day and in our update in October 2019 on our long-term targets here. Financial policies Rating Capital structure Dividend policy Min. Baa1/BBB+/BBB+ (Moody’s/S&P/Fitch) ~30 % (FFO/adjusted net debt) Our current rating is in accordance with the policy. Ambition to increase the dividend paid by a high single-digit rate compared to the dividends for the previous year up until 2025 Coastal Virginia Wind, off the coast of Virginia Beach, the US. 17 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Contents Our business 19 22 23 29 30 32 33 35 A catalyst for change Our strategic aspiration and growth platform Our markets and strategy Our capital allocation and funding Our strategic enablers Our business model Our strategic targets Our global footprint Our East Coast Hub in Grimsby, the UK, is the world’s largest offshore operations and maintenance centre. It serves our four operational wind farms in the area, along with the construction of a fifth. Aarron is based there as a wind turbine technician on Hornsea 1 Offshore Wind Farm. He is one of hundreds working in a job generated by Ørsted, whose investment here has reinvigorated the former fishing town’s economy. Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents A catalyst for change 2020 demonstrated the vulnerability of global society. In the past year, the world was shaken by a global pandemic with more than 80 million cases of COVID-19 and more than 1.8 million lives lost, disrupting all parts of the global economy. In parallel with the unprecedented pandemic, 2020 ended as another record-breaking year for climate change as it became the joint hottest year on record and by far the warmest year ever recorded in Europe, while the frequency and severity of extreme weather events continued to increase. In February, the Antarctic hit 20 °C for the first time ever, and its ice cap shrank to the second-smallest ever. Record-breaking wildfires raged through Australia and the US West Coast, fuelled by longer dry seasons and extreme events like heatwaves. We saw the most active Atlantic hurricane season on record, and an unusually heavy monsoon flooding in India and in South and East Asia ruined millions of homes. The unprecedented events of 2020 have clearly reinforced the urgency to change the way humanity treats our planet and accounts for environmental and social risks. Climate change threatens to fundamentally change the conditions for life on our planet. The impor- tance of collective action, decision-making based on facts and guided by science, and decisive reactions are more evident than ever. And while it is of essence that the transition to a global green economy happens in balance with our natural environment and societies, it is critical that we keep momentum. This is a moment for the world to take bold and necessary action. The need to build a more sustainable world has never been stronger. How to stay below 1.5 °C The science is clear: We are heading towards an increasingly vulnerable world with com- plex environmental, health, and economic crises if we do not act now. To meet the 1.5 °C Paris Agreement goals, humanity must at least halve global carbon emissions during the next ten years. The first important stones have been laid to ensure the right conditions for this to happen. Wind and solar PV are today the cheapest sources of new-built generation in at least two-thirds of the world. Since 2012, the cost of electricity from offshore wind has decreased by 66 % and is now lower than electricity generated by nuclear power, coal, or natural gas. So far, 121 countries have com- mitted to net zero emissions by 2050, along with 454 cities and almost 1,400 businesses. Through the Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance, 33 of the world’s largest investors with USD 5.1 trillion of assets under management have agreed on portfolio decarbonisation targets to align portfolios with a 1.5 °C scenario. With the Green Deal, the EU has increased its green ambitions towards 2030, which can help drive further deployment of renewable technologies in the EU. Still, progress is not happening remotely fast enough to reduce emissions at the necessary pace. Although we saw global carbon emis- sions fall temporarily in 2020 due to COVID-19 lockdowns and the resulting slowdown of the global economy, these reductions were neither systemic nor sustainable. In fact, supply chain disruptions from COVID-19 temporarily delayed the build-out of renew- able energy in the EU energy sector. The EU is defining ‘green’ Sustainable finance is a critical enabler of the green transformation of industries across the EU and globally. For the energy industry alone, the IPCC estimates a USD 2.4 trillion annual shortfall in clean energy investment through 2035 to meet the 1.5 °C Paris Agreement goal. Mobilisation and reallocation of institutional and private capital will be necessary to meet this challenge. The global economy remains far from operating at a net-zero level, and emissions are not being reduced by the required volume and pace. At the same time, countries and businesses need to prepare better for a changing climate. environmental objectives. Upcoming taxonomy regulation will determine when an economic activity can be considered sustainable. In 2018, The European Commission established a technical expert group on sustainable finance which was assigned with developing recommendations on the taxonomy’s technical screening criteria for the objectives of climate change mitigation and adaptation. The group’s recommendations were presented to the European Commission in March 2020 and gener- ally formed the basis for draft legislation put forward by the Commission in November 2020. The EU is preparing a taxonomy to be used as a tool to help plan and report on the transition to an economy that is consistent with the EU’s At Ørsted, we plan to align with the taxonomy after the final version is launched by the EU, expectedly in 2021. 19 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Limiting global warming to 1.5 °C will require a structural change of the global energy system as 73 % of global greenhouse gas emissions come from the use of energy, mainly due to the burning of fossil fuels. The 1.5 °C pathway requires a significant increase in electrification, acceleration of green energy build-out, phasing out of fossil fuels, and increased energy efficiency. The share of electricity in overall energy consumption must increase from about 20 % today to at least 50 % by 2050. The projected rate of the green energy build-out must be more than doubled towards 2030, and coal-fired power generation needs to be phased-out at least three times faster than the projected rate of retirement. By a wide margin, climate change is humani- ty’s greatest challenge. Although renewable energy build-out has the risk of impacting land-use and biodiversity, it is critical we keep momentum. The global energy industry has the technologies and capabilities need- ed to undertake the transformation. Now, it is time to act. It is time to deliver on commit- ments, to deploy and scale technologies at hand, and to accelerate the transformation to a sustainable society. Ørsted wants to be a catalyst for change Our vision is a world that runs entirely on green energy. Every day, we act as a catalyst for the change needed to build a sustainable energy supply. Over the past decade, we have transformed our business fundamentally, from being one of the most carbon-intensive utilities in Europe to becoming a renewable energy major and one of the most sustainable companies in the world. We are committed to taking a leading role in the global green ener- gy transformation, and we have set ambitious targets for reducing our carbon footprint. By 2025, we aim to be a carbon-neutral company (emission scopes 1 - 2), which we plan to achieve by at least a 98 % reduction in carbon emissions from our energy genera- tion and operations compared to 2006. The remaining less than 2 % will be either elimi- nated or covered by certified carbon offsets. By 2040, we aim to reach net-zero emissions across our entire value chain (scopes 1 - 3), having a midway target to reduce our scope 3 emissions by 50 % by 2032. Our carbon reduc- tion targets are confirmed by the Science Based Targets initiative to be consistent with the reductions required by energy companies to keep global warming below 1.5 °C and are the most ambitious science-based targets in our sector. In 2020, we made significant progress to- wards these targets with green energy build-out and scaling-up of new technolo- gies, including renewable hydrogen. During the year, we added 1.4 GW of installed renewable energy capacity in onshore and offshore wind, adding up to our total of 11.3 GW. Our carbon emissions intensity We are on track to becoming carbon-neutral already in 2025 Carbon intensity of energy generation and operations (scopes 1 and 2) g CO2e/kWh 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Science Based Targets initiative’s 1.5 °C path- way for greenhouse gas reductions in the energy sector Ørsted’s carbon intensity of energy generation 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Climate-related financial disclosures At Ørsted, we are aware of the transitional and physical impacts of climate change on the resilience of our business as recommend- ed by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). By endorsing and aligning our practices and reporting with the TCFD recommendations over the past three years, we have crystallised our understanding and disclosure of climate-related risks and opportunities. Our TCFD disclosure is integrated throughout the strategy, risk, and governance sections of this annual report. This year, we expanded our ESG performance report to include a one- page overview with references to our TCFD alignment: orsted.com/ESGperformance2020 20 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Our contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals The year 2020 reinforced the global realisation of people, businesses, and nature being interconnected and interdependent. Experiences of the past year clarified the need to deliver on the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which address the key economic, social, and environmental challenges the world faces and acts as a global framework for achieving a more sustainable future. We acknowledge that the resilience and long-term success of Ørsted’s business directly depend on us supporting a global society that is in balance with the resources of our planet, protecting natural habitats and local communities as much as economic growth. To sustain our long-term value creation, we ensure that our green energy build-out is executed sustainably through a systematic and programmatic approach to sustainability. We seek to strengthen the positive impacts and to mitigate and avoid potential negative impacts derived from our core business activities and a global green transition. With our core business, we aspire to have a transformative impact on SDG 7 on afforda- ble and clean energy and SDG 13 on climate action. Moreover, we indirectly impact several other SDGs, especially those listed to the right. Catalysing the green energy transformation Addressing the sustainability impacts of the green energy transformation We report on our SDG contributions and impacts and all our 20 sustainability programmes in our sustainability report, orsted.com/sustainability2020. A full ESG data overview and our accounting policies are available in our annual ESG performance report, orsted.com/ESGperformance2020. Together, the two reports constitute our annual Communication on Progress to the UN Global Compact and comply with the re- quirements for corporate social responsibility reporting set out in section 99 a of the Danish Financial Statements Act as well as section 99 b on gender distribution and section 107 d on diversity at management levels. (scopes 1 and 2) decreased in 2020 by 11 %. However, 2020 showed an increase in Ørsted’s absolute carbon emissions due to a temporary increase in our use of coal of 13 % at our Danish power plants. Our service obligations in Denmark require us to provide ancillary services that help grid operators maintain a reliable electricity system. This sometimes requires the use of coal to ensure a stable supply of energy. Our commitment to end our use of coal by 2023 remains unchanged, and we are on track towards this goal. Until then, however, we may see fluctuations in coal consumption, driven by market and weather conditions. The next frontier in our journey towards net-zero emissions in our total carbon footprint by 2040 is to gradually phase out our supply of gas from long-term gas contracts and to decarbonise our supply chain. Therefore, we allow existing long-term gas contracts to expire gradually and do not enter into new contracts. Across our supply chain, we are committed to reaching beyond our own emissions and to working with our suppliers to gradually remove carbon emissions. Thus, we encourage our strategic suppliers to: 1) disclose their emissions and set science-based targets aligned with a 1.5 °C scenario, 2) use 100 % green electricity in the manufacturing of wind turbines, foun- dations, cables, and substations by 2025, 3) optimise their vessel fleets and develop a roadmap towards powering vessels with renewable energy. We launched our supply chain decarbonisa- tion programme a year ago. During this first year, we have focused on building the foun- dation and management structure to drive our programme and have begun to engage with our strategic offshore wind suppliers on the decarbonisation journey ahead. The offshore wind supply chain today includes carbon intensive activities, particularly the use of energy-intensive construction materi- als, such as steel, aluminium, and copper, as well as fuel for offshore construction vessels. As part of our dialogue with our top strategic suppliers, including wind turbine, foundation, and cable manufacturers, we support them in building solid and uniform carbon account- ing policies and data capture by utilising the CDP reporting framework. Based on this solid foundation, we will work with our suppliers over the coming years to establish emission reduction roadmaps and targets supporting our overall strategic targets. 21 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Our strategic aspiration and growth platform Our global leadership position in offshore wind and strong North American position in onshore wind and solar photovoltaics (PV) provide a solid foundation for tapping into the significant growth opportunities in renew- able energy and for realising our aspiration of becoming a global green energy major. Ørsted develops, constructs, owns, and operates wind farms, solar farms, and energy storage facilities, and we own and operate bioenergy plants. In addition to our generation activities, Ørsted engages in partnerships and develops projects related to the production of renewable hydrogen. Finally, we bring our power and heat to market and engage in trading activities to secure offtake and provide energy solutions to our customers. We are the largest offshore wind constructor in the world, and we are market leader in each of the four regions where we operate: the UK, Continental Europe, North America, and Asia Pacific, excluding mainland China. Our strate- gic ambition is to maintain a market-leading position in all regions where we operate. Our onshore wind and solar PV business is expanding rapidly, and we are now among Our growth platform Offshore wind Europe North America Asia Pacific Maintain leadership Onshore wind and solar PV Explore growth opportunities Build strong position Explore growth opportunities Renewable hydrogen Execute projects and pursue scale-up opportunities the five largest US constructors in terms of new capacity additions in 2020. Our strategic ambition is to further strengthen our position in North America by building a diverse onshore wind and solar PV portfolio. In addition, we continue to monitor onshore growth opportu- nities in Europe and Asia Pacific. heavy transport where direct electrification is difficult or impossible. However, renewable hydrogen is currently not cost-competitive with fossil-based alternatives. Significant challenges must be overcome to create and scale a hydrogen market, requiring action from both policymakers and companies. We see increasing political support in Europe for the development of renewable hydrogen. When produced with renewable power, hydrogen offers a solution for decarbonising industries such as ammonia, steel, refining, and Ørsted has established a pipeline of eight renewable hydrogen projects in Denmark, Germany, the UK, and the Netherlands. In January 2021, we took FID on our first renew- able hydrogen project, marking the beginning of a new phase in Ørsted’s green transfor- mation journey. We see growth potential in renewable hydrogen and are pursuing scale-up opportunities as we execute on our pipeline. Our growth platform in offshore wind, onshore wind, and solar PV, and our growth potential in renewable hydrogen provide a solid foundation for realising our aspiration of becoming a global green energy major. 22 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Our markets and strategy Global demand for renewable energy is increasing. We are well- positioned to tap into this growth and are on track to maintain our undisputed leadership position in offshore wind as we continue to strengthen our position in onshore wind and solar PV. Global installed renewable capacity is expected to exceed 4 TW in 2030, more than double today’s capacity. Offshore wind, onshore wind, and large-scale solar PV are expected to grow towards 2030 by 19 %, 11 %, and 9 % per year, respectively. This reflects increasing demand for electricity worldwide, ambitious govern- ment decarbonisation programmes, and the cost-competitiveness of renewable technologies – many of which still have not fully matured. So far, renewables have proved resilient to the impacts of COVID-19 compared to other sectors, and long-term capacity forecasts have remained stable. Bloomberg New Energy Finance’s (BNEF) post-COVID-19 2030 forecast for renewable capacity fell by just 1 % relative to last year’s forecast. In the short term, some delays to renewable energy projects are antici- pated; however, growth is expected to resume in 2021 as delayed projects come online. We also see COVID-19 recovery packages adding new impetus to green transitions in some markets. Most notable is the European Commission’s EUR 750 billion package which focuses on decarbonising buildings, supporting growth in renewable power, and accelerating investment into renewable hydrogen and clean transport. However, it is currently not possible to know the long-term impact of COVID-19. Across our markets, we are experiencing growing demand from companies for corporate power purchase agreements (CPPAs). CPPAs Global renewable energy capacity by technology1 GW installed CAGR 19 % offshore wind 9 % onshore wind 11 % large-scale PV 13 % small-scale PV 2 % biomass +10 % / year 4,392 -1 % 160 922 4,342 183 823 1,518 1,559 have long been an important part of doing business in onshore wind and solar PV, and in 2020, we signed over 700 MW of CPPAs with five different customers across four US projects. Ørsted is also playing a key role in developing the global CPPA market for offshore wind, with several landmark agreements in 2020. In July, Ørsted and Taiwan-based TSMC signed a 20-year contract, under which TSMC will offtake the full production of Ørsted’s 920 MW offshore wind farm Greater Changhua 2b & 4, making it the world’s largest renewables CPPA. In December, we signed a 10-year CPPA with Amazon who will offtake 250 MW of Borkum Riffgrund 3 Offshore Wind Farm’s total capacity of 900 MW. This is Europe’s largest CPPA to date. 1,630 143 236 536 679 36 1,604 1,571 188 206 2020 2030 (Pre- COVID-19) 2030 (Post- COVID-19) 1 Excludes solar thermal, geothermal, marine, tidal, and others which combined account for less than 1 % of capacity. Source: BNEF New Energy Outlook 2019 for pre-COVID-19 2030 forecast and BNEF New Energy Outlook 2020 for 2020 capacity and post-COVID-19 2030 forecast for all technologies except offshore wind. Offshore wind figures from BNEF Offshore Wind Market Outlook H2 2019 for pre-COVID-19 2030 forecast and BNEF Offshore Wind Market Outlook H2 2020 for 2020 capacity and post-COVID-19 2030 forecast. Competition within the renewables industry is intensifying due to the significant growth oppor- tunities ahead. New competitors have entered the market, oil majors have announced signifi- cant renewable energy ambitions, and leading utilities are reshaping and expanding their re- newable portfolios. We welcome the increasing involvement of new and existing players as the build-out of renewable energy must accelerate if we are to halve global emissions by 2030 in line with the Paris Agreement. We continue to see many profitable growth opportunities and remain confident that we will meet the strategic ambition set in November 2018 of installing more than 30 GW of renewable capacity by 2030. Ørsted is organised into three business units. Offshore includes our offshore wind portfolio and our emerging renewable hydrogen business, and Onshore is responsible for our onshore wind and solar PV portfolio. Markets & Bioenergy plays an important role in supporting our generation portfolio by providing services that help offtake Ørsted’s energy production and manage our risk exposure. It is also responsible for our portfolio of combined heat and power (CHP) plants which provide green heat and power as well as ancillary services to Denmark’s energy system, making a significant contribution to the Danish decarbonisation efforts. 23 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Offshore The global offshore wind market In 2020, global installed offshore wind capacity reached 24 GW, excluding mainland China. Significant market growth is expected towards 2030, driven by offshore wind’s large technical potential (i.e. the achievable energy production given environmental, land-use, and system constraints) and rapidly declining LCoE, combined with supportive policy targets and regulatory frameworks. BNEF estimates that approx. 7 GW of offshore wind will be built annually from 2020 to 2025, and that annual installations will almost triple to an average of 20 GW per year from 2025 to 2030 as growth in North America and Asia Pacific accelerates. farms worldwide than any other company. By the end of 2020, Ørsted had 7.6 GW of capacity installed, 2.3 GW of capacity under construction, and a further 5.0 GW of capacity awarded. Our ambition and strategic focus in offshore wind Ørsted is the world leader in offshore wind, with a market share of approx. 30 % of global capacity installed, excluding mainland China. We have played a key role in maturing the industry, and we have built more offshore wind Competition is intensifying as growth oppor- tunities in offshore wind increase. This means that Ørsted cannot and should not win all the auctions and tenders in which we participate. We remain financially disciplined in our bidding and final investment decisions to make sure we build a healthy, sustainable business and, over time, secure enough wins to fulfil the strategic ambition set in November 2018 of maintaining our market leadership position in offshore wind and of reaching 15 GW of installed off- shore wind capacity by 2025. With our current portfolio of projects under construction and awarded, we have nearly reached this target. Global offshore wind capacity, excl. mainland China GW installed Offshore capacity build-out towards 2025, MW North America Asia Pacific Europe Capacity awarded Capacity under construction Capacity installed +20 GW/year +7 GW/year 161 23 36 102 +3 GW/year 61 11 24 0 0 24 7 10 44 2015 2020 2025 2030 7,572 1,386 900 9,858 1,220 1,142 1,714 920 14,854 ~15,000 2020 capacity installed Hornsea 2 Greater Changhua 1 & 2a Capacity installed and under construction US North-East cluster1 US Mid-Atlantic cluster2 German portfolio3 Greater Changhua 2b & 4 Capacity installed, under construction, and awarded 2025 ambition Source: BNEF Offshore Wind Market Outlook H2 2020. 1 US North-East cluster: South Fork (130 MW), Revolution Wind (704 MW), and Sunrise Wind (880 MW). 2 US Mid-Atlantic cluster: Skipjack Wind (120 MW) and Ocean Wind 1 (1,100 MW). 3 German portfolio: Gode Wind 3 (242 MW) and Borkum Riffgrund 3 (900 MW). 24 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Selected government offshore wind and renewable energy targets Region Europe UK Germany Netherlands Poland France Denmark Belgium Ireland Total capacity GW† Target 19.7 40 GW by 2030 10.8 20 GW by 2030, 40 GW by 2040 5.3 11.5 GW by 2030 Region North America New York New Jersey Virginia n.a. 10.9 GW awarded by 2027 Massachusetts 3.5 2.7 2.3 0.0 8.75 GW tendered by 2028 7 GW tendered by 2030 4 GW by 2030 3.5 GW by 2030 Baltic States n.a. 1.7 GW tendered by 20301 Italy Sweden 0.0 0.2 0.9 GW by 2030 100 % renewable energy by 2040* Connecticut Maryland Rhode Island California Asia Pacific Japan Taiwan South Korea Total capacity GW† Target 4.4 1.1 0.0 1.6 1.1 0.1 0.4 9 GW by 2035 7.5 GW by 2035 2.5 GW by 2026, 5.2 GW by 2034 3.2 GW by 2030 2 GW by 2030 1.6 GW by 2030 100 % renewable energy by 2030* n.a. 100 % clean power by 2045*2 0.2 5.7 0.1 10 GW by 2030, 30-45 GW by 2040 15.5 GW by 20353 12 GW by 2040 Our offshore regions and renewable hydrogen The UK The UK is an attractive, advanced market with sophisticated regulatory schemes supporting an efficient and competitive deployment of offshore wind. With over 10 GW in operation today, the UK is the largest offshore wind market in the world. It also has one of the most ambitious national build-out programmes and is targeting 40 GW by 2030. With a visible pipeline of over 50 GW, the region is well- positioned to achieve this target. Ørsted is market leader in the UK with a market share of 42 % of installed capacity. Our portfolio includes 5.8 GW of capacity installed and under construction and up to 5 GW of capacity under development in the Hornsea zone, more specifically our Hornsea 3 and 4 projects. The UK is our largest market, and we currently operate 15 offshore wind farms in British waters. At the country level, ambitions are also growing. Denmark, Germany, and Poland raised their renewable and offshore wind targets in 2020. BNEF estimates that Euro- pean offshore wind capacity will grow from 14 GW today to 64 GW by 2030, exeeding the EU’s goal. Continental Europe Offshore wind build-out is expected to ac- celerate in Continental Europe, driven by the European Commission’s European Green Deal and offshore renewable energy strategy. In the latter, the commission has set an objective of installing 60 GW of offshore wind by 2030 and 300 GW by 2050 within the EU 27 to meet the climate goals of the Paris Agreement. Ørsted has a strong position in Continental Europe. We are the largest offshore wind player with a market share of 23 % of installed capacity. Our operating portfolio totals 3.1 GW, and we have been awarded 1.1 GW in Germany. We have a strong market position in all major offshore wind markets in addition to significant partnership experience and an extensive indus- try network across Continental Europe. Targets are subject to change and indicate installed capacity, unless otherwise noted. ¹ ² ³ Lithuania has drafted a law to tender 700 MW of offshore wind by 2023. Latvia and Estonia have signed a memorandum of understanding for a joint offshore wind tender of 1 GW to be commissioned by 2030. State modelling shows approx. 10 GW of offshore wind is needed to meet clean power target. Taiwan has met its target of 5.5 GW commissioned by 2025. It has set a goal of adding an additional 10 GW of offshore wind capacity between 2026 and 2035. * Clean energy target, technology not specified. † Total capacity includes capacity in operation, under construction, and awarded capacity. North America US states are driving demand for offshore wind in North America, as state policymakers expand renewable energy programmes to meet decarbonisation goals. The US has less than 0.1 GW of offshore wind installed today, but is forecast to reach 7 GW by 2025 and 23 GW by 2030. Ørsted operates Block Island, the US’s first offshore wind farm, and we were the engi- neering, procurement, and construction lead for the pilot project Coastal Virginia Wind, the first offshore wind project in US federal waters, commissioned in October 2020. We have gained strong market traction as well as built partnerships in the emerging US market 25 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents with approx. 2.9 GW of capacity awarded and 4.5 GW of capacity under development along the East Coast. Asia Pacific Robust and favourable regulatory regimes position Asia Pacific as an important region for offshore wind. Asia Pacific has 0.4 GW of installed capacity today, but is expected to reach 36 GW by 2030, mostly driven by build-out in Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea. Taiwan has met its target of awarding 5.5 GW to be commissioned by 2025 and has released a draft auction guideline for the next 10 GW planned for construction between 2026 and 2035. Japan set new offshore wind targets in December 2020 and is now aiming for 10 GW by 2030 and 30 to 45 GW by 2040. Achieving these goals would make Japan one of the largest offshore wind markets in the world. South Korea has announced it plans to build 12 GW of offshore wind to reach its aim of 20 % renewables in its energy mix by 2030 and up to 35 % by 2040. Ørsted is well-positioned to expand in Asia Pacific. We are the number one offshore wind player, excluding mainland China, with 0.1 GW of capacity in operation, 0.9 GW of capacity under construction, and 0.9 GW of capacity awarded. We have a strong pipeline of project opportunities in Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea, supported locally through offices in Taipei, Tokyo, and Seoul. Renewable hydrogen In addition to offshore wind, we are pursuing opportunities in renewable hydrogen in Europe. In July, the European Commission launched the European Clean Hydrogen Alliance with the target of building 6 GW of electrolyser capacity by 2024 and up to 40 GW by 2030. The commission has an ambition of making Europe a global front- runner within renewable hydrogen, and we expect this ambition to create additional growth opportunities for Ørsted, if policies and regulatory incentives make projects economically viable. Our pipeline focuses on the application of renewable hydrogen in refinery processes, ammonia production, and fuel production for trucks, buses, vessels, and planes. With the FID on the H2RES project in January, Ørsted has 2 MW of electrolyser capacity under construction. The facility will produce renewable hydrogen to be used as fuel in road transport and will provide important learnings to help turn Europe’s ambitious targets into reality. Expected offshore wind auctions and tenders in 20211 Award in 2021 H1 2021 H2 2021 Timing not yet announced 2021 / 2022 Award in H2 2021 Maryland 2 ~400 MW Award in Q2 2021 New Jersey 2 up to 2,400 MW Japanese round 1 ~1,500 MW UK round 4 up to 12,000 MW Massachusetts 3 1,600 MW German tender 900 MW Polish award 5,900 MW Rhode Island up to 600 MW Maryland 3 ~ 400 MW Connecticut 4 ~ 1,000 MW French tender 4 1,000 MW Danish tender 800-1,000 MW 1 All auction and tender timelines and capacities are based on current expectations and are subject to change. Q4 2021 / Q1 2022 Holland Coast West 1,520 MW H2 2021 / H1 2022 Taiwan auction TBA 26 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Onshore The North American onshore wind and solar PV markets Onshore renewable energy is the largest non-fossil energy source in the world. Onshore wind and large-scale solar PV accounted for 75 % of installed renewable capacity and 77 % of new capacity additions worldwide in 2020. In North America, onshore wind is the leading renewable technology. It reached 134 GW of installed capacity by the end of 2020 and is expected to continue growing by 5 % per year towards 2030. Large-scale solar PV comes in second at 57 GW and is expected to accelerate towards 2030 at an annual rate of 10 %. The strong growth in solar PV is fuelled by its ability to cost-effectively replace retiring fossil-fuelled power stations across much of the western, central, and south-eastern US. In addition, companies are signing more solar CPPAs as they look to procure energy from different technologies in order to supply their operations 24/7 with clean energy. Our ambition and strategic focus in onshore wind and solar PV Our Onshore business gained strong traction in 2020. Ørsted is now among the five largest constructors in the US when measured by new capacity additions. Last year, we commis- sioned the onshore wind farms Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek and took final investment decisions on the onshore wind farms Western Trail and Haystack. This makes our onshore wind portfolio one of the fastest growing in the US, and we rank fourth in annual MW installed last year. Furthermore, the acquisition of Muscle Shoals and the final investment decision on Old 300 Solar Center strengthened our North American solar PV platform. Ørsted is currently ranked second in the US in terms of large-scale solar PV under construction. Our Onshore portfolio of assets installed and under construction now totals 3.4 GW, of which 2.3 GW is onshore wind and 1.1 GW is solar PV. We also have 40 MWac of battery storage under construction in connection with the Permian Energy Center. We view energy storage as a complement to our renewables portfolio, and we continue to pursue storage projects that allow us to optimise our generation assets. We are well on track to meet our target of 5 GW of installed capacity by 2025. When the Permian Energy Center comes online this year, we will have established a full-spectrum renewable portfolio in the US, spanning solar PV, onshore wind, offshore wind, and battery storage. Our strategic ambition is to build a strong North American position in onshore wind and solar PV. Onshore expansion is also part of our strategy, and we are actively seeking growth opportunities outside North America. Our initial focus is on Europe, but we continue to monitor opportunities in Asia Pacific. Going forward, we aim to further diversify our onshore investments across markets and across our portfolio of technologies. This will allow us to offer new, global solutions to customers by taking advantage of complementary generation profiles, while reducing our risk exposure. In addition, we continue driving operational excellence, Onshore capacity build-out towards 2025, MW Capacity under construction Capacity installed ~5,000 1,658 420 227 367 298 400 3,370 2020 capacity installed Permian Energy Center1 Muscle Shoals Western Trail Haystack Old 300 Solar Center Capacity installed and under construction 2025 ambition 1 Permian Energy Center consists of 420 MWac solar PV capacity and 40 MWac of battery storage. reducing LCoE, and working to secure tax equity financing for our projects in the medium term. Long-term, we are focused on securing power purchase agreements to ensure solid economics after the phase out of the production tax credit and the investment tax credit for wind and solar PV projects, respectively. We will also continue developing the capabilities of our US-based trading unit which manages risk and protects the value of our US generation portfolio. 1 North America includes the US and Canada. Excludes solar thermal, geothermal, marine, and tidal which combined account for less than 1 % of capacity. Source: BNEF New Energy Outlook 2020 for all tech- nologies except offshore wind. Offshore wind figures from BNEF H2 2020 Offshore Wind Market Outlook. North American renewable capacity by technology1 GW installed Offshore wind Onshore wind Large-scale PV Small-scale PV Biomass +8 % / year 512 16 94 152 227 408 16 66 120 199 7 23 240 16 33 57 134 132 17 12 17 86 2015 2020 2025 2030 27 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Asnæs Power Station, Kalundborg, Denmark. Markets & Bioenergy Markets & Bioenergy contributes to Ørsted´s business in five ways. It provides an efficient route-to-market for commodities, including power and green certificates, for Ørsted and for third parties. Furthermore, it manages market risks for Ørsted’s generation portfolio. The business unit is also responsible for operating, optimising, and decarbonising our portfolio of CHP plants and for optimising our gas portfolio. Finally, Markets & Bioenergy is responsible for the operation of our waste-recycling plant, Renescience Northwich, which was commis- sioned in October 2020. Our portfolio of CHP plants continues to play a critical role in Denmark’s heat and power systems and supports the green transforma- tion by providing dispatchable power with a low carbon footprint. We have completed the planned conversions of our coal-fired units to renewable biomass and continue to source third-party certified sustainable biomass in line with Denmark’s newly announced regulations. We are targeting full carbon neutrality in our CHP operations by 2025. This includes the planned closure of our last coal-fired power station in Esbjerg, Denmark, in 2023 and the implementation of offset projects for our CHP portfolio’s remaining carbon footprint. The variable generation profiles of renewable assets do not always match short-term fore- casts, and the difference needs to be balanced as power enters the market. Markets & Bioen- ergy supports Ørsted’s generation activities by providing an efficient route-to-market, including balancing services, and seeks out opportunities to offer these services to third parties. Natural gas is a fossil fuel and should be gradually phased out of the energy mix. Consequently, we neither enter into new long- term gas sourcing contracts nor prolong expiring contracts. Our focus is on maximising the value of our legacy natural gas portfolio through trading, contract negotiations, and portfolio optimisation. Constantly fluctuating commodity prices and changing market conditions require strong risk management capabilities to protect the value of Ørsted’s generation portfolio. Markets & Bioenergy meets this challenge through the development and deployment of state-of- the-art risk monitoring and management tools for an expanding set of market risks. 28 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Our capital allocation and funding Our strategy is backed by a DKK 200 billion investment programme for the period 2019 to 2025 and is entirely funded by green capital. the crisis, and we completed our scheduled funding activities as planned. In November, we issued 15 billion in NTD-denominated bonds. Furthermore, we completed the divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses in August 2020, freeing up DKK 20.5 billion for investment in our growth platform. Since 2017, all new capital has been issued in a green format in accordance with our Green Finance Framework. With this year’s debt issu- ances, our total outstanding debt, excluding hybrids, amounted to DKK 37.1 billion, of which more than 51 % was issued in a green format. In November 2018, we announced our strate- gic plan to invest DKK 200 billion from 2019 to 2025, with more than 95 % earmarked for our growth platform in offshore wind, onshore wind, and solar PV, the balance being dedicat- ed to our Markets & Bioenergy activities. We have invested DKK 50 billion over the course of 2019 and 2020, primarily in Offshore and Onshore construction activities which total DKK 35 billion and DKK 13 billion, respectively. We allocate capital according to the following principles in order of priority. First, we adhere to our strong commitment to our credit ratings (BBB+/Baa1). Second, we intend to increase our dividend by a high single-digit rate annually until 2025. Third, we invest in value-creating growth opportunities. Finally, potential excess capital will be returned to our shareholders in the form of additional dividends and/or share buy-backs. The uncertainty concerning the economic impact of COVID-19 caused turbulence in financial markets in the spring of 2020. However, Ørsted’s conservative approach to liquidity management allowed us to weather Burbo Bank Extension, Liverpool Bay, the UK. 29 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Our strategic enablers Achieving our aspiration of becoming a global green energy major requires continuously strengthening our organisation in three key areas: talent, digitalisation, and innovation. Talent Talent has been the cornerstone of Ørsted’s transformation, and we will continue needing exceptional people with the right values as we grow our business and expand our geograph- ical footprint. We want to be a global green energy major – powered by talent. Thus, we have a strong focus on employer branding, talent acquisition, inclusion, and well-being as well as the identification, development, and deployment of diverse talent around the world. In 2020, we made significant progress on our talent ambition. We improved our positioning in the Universum employer branding rankings for Denmark. For example, Ørsted moved from 25th place in 2018 to seventh place in 2020 for experienced business professionals, with com- parable changes in other candidate segments. We were also listed in FastCompany’s Best Workplaces for Innovators for the first time – the only company with a European HQ in the top 20. As a result of such branding, and with increased focus on recruiting best-in-class, diverse talent, we hired and onboarded over 1,300 new employees around the world. In addition, we launched our first Global Learning Week which was accessed by thousands of employees. Usage of digital learning content in our learning management system has increased more than tenfold since 2018. We also delivered virtual learning programmes for all managers to enable them to support career development in their teams. Finally, to ensure our culture is inclusive of diversity and supports our global growth, we surveyed all employees to understand their sense of opportunities and challenges in this area. The data gathered informs our focus on ensuring equal opportunities, cultivating psy- chological safety, and building inclusive virtual workplaces. Ørsted’s Executive Committee has set targets for gender balance in all levels of the organisation and for the multicultural mix in our leadership team. Digitalisation Digitalisation is a key enabler of value creation at Ørsted. We systematically deploy a variety of digital technologies to streamline business processes to develop data-driven business cases, to drive state-of-the-art energy market and risk management, and to improve the design, construction, operations, and maintenance of our assets. For example, Ørsted is using advanced data analytics and machine learning to achieve operations and maintenance cost reductions as well as annual energy production uplift. Calendar-based maintenance schedules are being substituted for a data-driven approach. This way, if an asset does not require physical maintenance at the scheduled time and can be inspected remotely, we avoid unnecessary costs. We also utilise wind turbine data to contin- uously correct wind turbine yaw and pitch alignment. When aligned correctly into the wind, a wind turbine produces more electricity and is subject to less wear and tear over time. This increases the lifetime of the asset and reduces the lifetime maintenance cost. Finally, we utilise algorithm-assisted power market trading in Continental Europe and the UK. Recent years have seen a significant increase in the frequency of trades and a decrease in the average tick size, leading to power trading at super-human speed. Digital capabilities enable us to create value in fast-moving commodity markets by securing good prices for the inherently long position Ørsted has within power generation. East Coast Hub at the Port of Grimsby, Lincolnshire, the UK. 30 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Humberside Airport, near Grimsby, Lincolnshire, the UK. Innovation Innovation is part of our DNA. The willingness to challenge the notion of what is possible and the ability to identify opportunities and to innovate our way around challenges were instrumental in our strategic transformation. These competences are also what allow us to maintain our leadership position in the rapidly growing renewables market. For example, we spearheaded the first commercial deployment of 66 kV array cables for an offshore asset project in 2020 at our Borssele 1 & 2 Offshore Wind Farm. Previously, 33 kV array cables were considered state-of- the-art. Ørsted challenged this idea, and we succeeded in marshalling support from our peers and supply chain for the development and implementation of the new cables, reduc- ing losses and ensuring optimal substation design. The next step is the development of 132 kV array cables which will be needed to maximise the potential of the next generation of wind turbines with ratings of 15 MW or more. In addition to pushing the boundaries of what is technically feasible, we are rethinking the deployment of renewable generation and transmission assets to support the green transition of Europe’s energy system. The Danish parliament has decided to develop an offshore wind hub of 2 GW by 2030 off the coast of Bornholm, a Danish island in the Baltic Sea, with the potential of connecting Denmark, Poland, Sweden, and Germany and of supporting the large-scale production of renewable hydrogen. We are engaged in ongoing dialogues with all stakeholders on how to expand the hub’s potential and how to ensure timely progress. This new energy hub represents the next step in technological scale and innovation and is key to unlocking the enormous potential of offshore wind. Finally, we continue to explore new products and technologies, focusing on the develop- ment and launch of combined technologies for Power-to-X. In 2020, we joined forces with a group of leading Danish companies, represent- ing both suppliers and buyers of sustainable fuels, in the Green Fuels for Denmark partner- ship which aims to develop a ground-breaking hydrogen and e-fuels production facility with the first phase in operation as soon as 2023. When fully scaled up by 2030, the project will deliver more than 250,000 tonnes of sustainable fuel every year for buses, trucks, vessels, and planes. Production will be based on a total electrolyser capacity of 1.3 GW, which will likely make it one of the largest facilities in the world of its kind. 31 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Our business model Key resources Business units Core activities Partly outsourced activities Value created Financial capital We finance our investments through cash flow from op- erations, debt, farm-downs, and divestments. Natural resources We depend on the availabil- ity of natural resources such as wind, solar irradiation, sustainable biomass, and seabed and land suitable for construction. Human resources We rely on a highly skilled workforce to operate our business. Innovative culture We innovate to continuously improve the competitive- ness of our energy solutions. Relational capital We depend on strong relations with key stake- holders to ensure supportive framework conditions for our business. Develop Construct Operate Own Offshore Capital employed 83 % Develop offshore wind farms. Construct offshore wind farms. Operate and maintain offshore wind farms. 2 offshore wind farms under construction. 27 offshore wind farms in operation. Projects under develop- ment in the UK, US, Germany, Poland, South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Pursue opportunities in renewable hydrogen. Raise capital through partnerships and farm-downs. 27 offshore wind farms under full or partial ownership. Onshore Capital employed 12 % Develop onshore wind and solar PV projects and secure tax equity financing. Projects under development primarily in ERCOT, SPP, and the South-East. Select best-in-class contractors to construct our onshore wind and solar farms. 2 onshore wind farms and 3 solar farms under construction. Select top-tier OEMs to operate and maintain our onshore wind and solar farms, with asset management performed in house. 7 onshore wind farms in operation. Raise capital through tax equity partnerships. 7 onshore wind farms under ownership. Markets & Bioenergy Capital employed 5 % 6 biomass CHP plants, 3 heat and ancillary service plants, and 1 coal- fired CHP plant under ownership. Operate and maintain CHP plants. Provide a route-to-market for Ørsted’s and third parties’ electricity, power certificates, and gas. Manage Ørsted’s energy portfolio risks. Optimise our legacy gas portfolio. Society We address profound soci- etal challenges by devel- oping green, independent, and economically viable energy systems that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and stimulate local growth and job creation. Customers We fulfil our customers’ energy needs through green, innovative, and efficient energy solutions. Employees We are committed to creating a safe working environment where all our employees can thrive, perform, and grow. Shareholders We create value for our shareholders in the form of competitive total returns. 32 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Our strategic targets Contents Target 1. EBITDA from operating offshore and onshore sites, % 3. Installed green capacity, GW Our target is to increase EBITDA from our wind and solar farms in operation by an average of 20 % per year from 2017 to 2023. From 2017 to 2020, we averaged an annual growth rate of 26 % in line with our objective. In 2018, we set an ambition to install more than 30 GW of green capacity by 2030. Of this, we aim to install 15 GW of offshore wind and 5 GW of onshore wind and solar PV by 2025. We are making good progress on our ambitions with 11.3 GW installed, 4.0 GW under construction, and 5.0 GW awarded at the end of 2020. CAGR +20 % CAGR +26 % ~25-26 bn 14.8 bn 16.9 bn 11.4 bn 8.5 bn Offshore wind Onshore wind and solar PV Biomass Total installed green capacity 8.3 9.9 11.3 +30 +20 5 15 2017 2018 2019 2020 2023 2018 2019 2020 2025 2030 2. ROCE, % 4. Green share of generation, % We target an average return on capital employed (ROCE) of approx. 10 % from 2019 to 2025. In 2018, ROCE was positively impacted by substantial profits from new partnership agreements, particularly divestment gains. In 2020, we increased the green share of generation to 90 %, up four percentage points compared to last year. We are on track to meet our objective of exceeding 95 % by 2023 and reaching 99 % by 2025. Approximate ROCE excl. gains from new partnership agreements 32.1 % 86 90 75 95 99 10.6 % 9.7 % Target ROCE ~10 % 17 2018 2019 2020 2006 2018 2019 2020 2023 2025 33 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business 5. Greenhouse gas emission intensity (scopes 1 and 2), g CO2e/kWh 7. Employee satisfaction, index 1-100 Contents Target We are well on track to meet our scopes 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity target of less than 10 g CO2e/kWh in 2025. In addition, we aim to be carbon-neutral in 2025 and will neutralise the remaining 10 g CO2e/kWh or less with carbon offsets. We reduced our GHG intensity to 58 g CO2e/kWh in 2020. We believe that employee satisfaction and strong results go hand in hand. Therefore, we are continuously working to improve the well-being of our employees. In 2020, we reached a record-high score of 78, placing Ørsted in the top 10 % of our external benchmark group, just as in 2018 and 2019. In 2019, we set a target to stay in the top 10 % from 2020 to 2025 and are proud to have met our goal this year. 462 -87 % -98 % 131 65 58 20 10 Ørsted Ennova benchmark top 10 % Ennova benchmark 76 76 70 77 76 72 78 78 73 Target employee satisfaction in top 10 % 2006 2018 2019 2020 2023 2025 2018 2019 2020 1 Scope 1 refers to the direct GHG emissions from our energy generation and operations, and scope 2 refers to the indirect GHG emissions from the energy we source for our operations. 6. Greenhouse gas emissions (scope 3), million tonnes CO2e 8. Safety, TRIR We aim to reduce our scope 3 emissions by 50 % between 2018 and 2032. This year, our historical figures for scope 3 emissions have been rebased due to the divestment of our LNG business. The primary source of our scope 3 emissions is indirect emissions related to wholesale buying and selling of natural gas and fossil-based power in our Markets & Bioenergy business and to the goods and services we source for the construction of our wind and solar farms. Safety is high on our agenda, and we do our utmost to prevent accidents and injuries. Our target is to reduce the total recordable injury rate (TRIR) to 2.9 by 2025. 36.2 -50 % 34.6 29.2 25.3 14.6 4.7 4.9 3.6 2.9 2018 2019 2020 2032 2018 2019 2020 2025 Adjusted base year 2018 34 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Our global footprint United Kingdom In operation: 4,939 MW Under construction: 1,386 MW Under development: 4,000-5,000 MW In operation: Renescience Northwich In operation: 20 MW Sales of energy United States of America In operation: 30 MW Awarded: 2,934 MW Under development: up to 4,500 MW In operation: 1,658 MW Under construction: 665 MW Under construction: 1,077 MW Under construction: 40 MW Activities Status Offshore wind Onshore wind Solar In operation Under construction (FID) Awarded Biomass-fired power plant Under development Fossil-fuelled power plant Waste-recycling plant Storage Sales of energy MW: Total gross capacity (even if Ørsted’s share is < 100 %). The MW for the wind farms in operation illustrates the operational capacity. The map shows selected Ørsted assets. South Korea Under development: up to 1,600 MW Sweden Sales of energy Denmark In operation: 945 MW In operation: our CHP plants, 2,850 MW power and 3,487 MW heat Sales of energy Germany In operation: 1,384 MW Awarded: 1,142 MW Sales of energy The Netherlands In operation: 752 MW Taiwan In operation: (Formosa 1) 128 MW Under construction: (Greater Changhua 1 & 2a) 900 MW Awarded: (Greater Changhua 2b &4) 920 MW 35 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Our footprint in Northern Europe Contents Sweden Sales of energy Denmark Sales of energy Anholt (400 MW) Herning Studstrup Skærbæk Esbjerg Kyndby Asnæs Svanemøllen H.C. Ørsted Avedøre 1 & 2 Horns Rev 1 (158 MW) Horns Rev 2 (209 MW) Walney Extension (659 MW) Walney 1 & 2 (367 MW) West of Duddon Sands (389 MW) Westermost Rough (210 MW) Barrow (90 MW) Burbo Bank Extension (259 MW) Burbo Bank (90 MW) Renescience Northwich Carnegie Road (20 MW) Hornsea 1 (1,218 MW) Hornsea 2 (1,386 MW) Hornsea 3 Hornsea 4 Combined (4,000- 5,000 MW) Lincs (270 MW) Race Bank (573 MW) Nysted (166 MW) Gode Wind 1 (345 MW) Gode Wind 2 (263 MW) Gode Wind 3 (242 MW) Borkum Riffgrund 3 (900 MW) Borkum Riffgrund 1 (312 MW) Borkum Riffgrund 2 (465 MW) The Netherlands Borssele 1 & 2 (752 MW) Germany Sales of energy Gunfleet Sands 1 & 2 (173 MW) London Array 1 (630 MW) United Kingdom Sales of energy Activities Status Offshore wind Onshore wind Solar In operation Under construction (FID) Awarded Biomass-fired power plant Under development Fossil-fuelled power plant Waste-recycling plant Storage Sales of energy MW: Total gross capacity (even if Ørsted’s share is < 100 %). The MW for the wind farms in operation illustrates the operational capacity. The map shows selected Ørsted assets. 36 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Our business Contents Our footprint in North America Willow Creek (103 MW) South Dakota Nebraska Haystack (298 MW) Plum Creek (230 MW) United States of America Sage Draw (338 MW) Tahoka (300 MW) Permian Energy Center (420/40 MW) Texas Lockett (184 MW) Western Trail (367 MW) Willow Springs (250 MW) Muscle Shoals (227 MW) Amazon (253 MW) Alabama Old 300 Solar Center (430 MW) Massachusetts Connecticut Rhode Island New Jersey New York Bay State Wind (~2,000 MW) Revolution Wind (704 MW) Block Island Wind Farm (30 MW) South Fork (130 MW) Sunrise Wind (880 MW) Virginia Maryland Delaware Ocean Wind 2 Ocean Wind 1 (1,100 MW) Garden State Wind Skipjack Wind (120 MW) Coastal Virginia Wind (12 MW) (EPC contract) Mid-Atlantic cluster development capacity in total (~2,500 MW) Activities Status Offshore wind In operation Onshore wind Under construction (FID) Solar Storage Awarded Under development MW: Total gross capacity (even if Ørsted’s share is < 100 %). The MW for the wind farms in operation illustrates the operational capacity. The map shows selected Ørsted assets. 37 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Contents Results 39 Results 43 Five-year summary 44 Fourth quarter 46 Quarterly summary, 2019-2020 Plum Creek, one of our new onshore wind farms, has brought more than just clean, reliable, low-cost energy to Nebraska’s Wayne County. Since June, the project has been helping fund the Norfolk and Winside school districts, local emergency services, a hospital, and the community college. It will continue to do so for the lifetime of the project. Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Results Contents Results Financial results Revenue Power generation from offshore and onshore wind increased by 35 % and totalled 20.9 TWh in 2020, mainly due to ramp-up of generation from Hornsea 1, Borssele 1 & 2, Lockett, Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek as well as higher wind speeds, mainly in Q1 2020. This was partly offset by periods with negative prices due to a lower demand for electricity driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, which led us to temporarily shut down generation. Thermal power generation amounted to 4.4 TWh, a 4 % decrease compared to last year due to slightly warmer weather and less favour- able market conditions for power generation, partly offset by a higher volume from ancillary services. Heat generation amounted to 6.7 TWh, down 20 % compared to last year, mainly due to a warm first quarter in 2020. Offshore and onshore wind accounted for 83 % of our total power generation, up 6 percentage points from last year. Revenue amounted to DKK 52.6 billion. The decrease of 22 % relative to 2019 was primarily due to limited construction works on wind farms for partners, significantly lower gas and power prices relative to last year, lower sales of gas, and lower thermal heat and power generation, partly offset by the increase in wind-based power generation. EBITDA Operating profit (EBITDA) totalled DKK 18.1 billion compared to DKK 17.5 billion in 2019. Earnings from offshore and onshore wind farms in operation amounted to DKK 16.9 billion. The 14 % increase relative to 2019 was due to the above-mentioned ramp-up of new wind farms in operation, receipt of CfDs of another 400 MW of Hornsea 1 from April, and higher wind speeds. This was partly offset by adverse COVID-19 impacts of approx. DKK 400 million on especially the UK power market due to a lower demand for electricity, which led to hours with negative prices from April to July, lower ROC recycle prices, and higher balanc- ing tariffs (BSUoS) from National Grid in 2020, and by lower earnings from trading related to hedging of our power exposures which achieved very high results in 2019. Earnings from construction agreements for partners totalled DKK 1.6 billion compared to DKK 3.8 billion in 2019. In 2020, our earnings from construction agreements mainly related to the lowered assumptions regarding the preferred bidder’s expected return requirement on the Hornsea 1 transmission asset, the construction of Coastal Virginia Wind, and minor updates regarding finalised construction projects. In 2019, earnings from construction agreements primarily concerned Hornsea 1. EBITDA from CHP plants amounted to DKK 1.1 billion, slightly below last year. The decrease was mainly due to lower thermal heat and power generation and lower power spreads as well as the reversal of a provision in 2019 of DKK 0.3 billion following the acquittal in the Elsam case. This was partly offset by higher earnings from sale of ancillary services in 2020. EBITDA from our gas activities were in line with last year. Higher earnings from revaluation of our gas at storage and a positive impact from storage hedges were offset by lower trans- ported and sold volumes due to the shutdown of the Tyra gas field from late 2019 until 2022 as well as a provision for bad debt in our B2B business to cover the extraordinary COVID-19- related default risks among our customers. Business performance versus IFRS, DKKm EBITDA – business performance Adjustments EBITDA – IFRS 2020 18,124 (1,526) 16,598 2019 17,484 1,536 19,020 Business performance versus IFRS We use business performance as an alternative to the results prepared in accordance with IFRS. Business performance represents the underlying financial performance of the Group in the reporting period as results are adjusted for temporary fluctuations in the market value of contracts (including hedging transactions) relating to other periods. The difference between the two principles will be eliminated as the contracts expire. Apart from this, there is no difference between business performance and the IFRS results. EBITDA in accordance with IFRS amounted to DKK 16.6 billion in 2020 against DKK 19.0 billion in 2019. In accordance with the business performance principle, EBITDA was DKK 18.1 billion and DKK 17.5 billion, respectively. The difference between the two principles was thus DKK -1.5 billion in 2020 against DKK 1.5 billion in 2019. In the presentation of the results according to IFRS, we have elected not to apply the provisions on hedge accounting of commodities and related currency exposures. The market value adjustments of these are continuously recognised in the income statement, which means that the IFRS results for the individual years are not comparable. IFRS results do not reflect the commercial risk hedging, according to which the business units and the Group are managed and evaluated. In the management’s review, com- ments are made on business performance only. Read more in note 1.6 and in note 7. 39 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Results Contents EBIT EBIT increased by 5 % to DKK 10.5 billion, primarily as a result of the higher EBITDA and no impairment losses in 2020. Depreciation increased due to more wind farms in opera- tion. Impairment losses in 2019 were related to a write-down of our Renescience plant and our 20 MW battery storage project Carnegie Road, both in the UK. Gain (loss) on divestment of enterprises Gain on divestment of enterprises primarily concerned the divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses to SEAS-NVE (now Andel). The trans- action resulted in a gain of DKK 10.9 billion. Financial income and expenses Net financial income and expenses amounted to DKK 2.5 billion compared to DKK 1.1 billion in 2019. The increase was mainly due to a loss on interest rate swaps in June in connection with early termination of local project financing in the US, negative effects from exchange rate adjustments due to a weakening of GBP, and capital losses on the bond portfolio due to the increasing interest rates. Tax and tax rate Tax on profit for the year amounted to DKK 2.1 billion, which was DKK 0.6 billion lower than in 2019. The decrease was mainly due to higher net financial expenses, partly offset by initial recognition of deferred taxes of DKK 1.1 billion related to tax equity at Sage Draw in April, Plum Creek in June, and Willow Creek in September. The effective tax rate was 11 %, and it was significantly impacted by the non-taxable gain on the divestment of our Danish power Financial results, DKKm Revenue EBITDA Depreciation Impairment reversals (losses) Operating profit (loss) (EBIT) Gain (loss) on divestment of enterprises Profit (loss) from associates and joint ventures Net financial income and expenses Tax Tax rate Profit for the year from continuing operations Profit for the year from discontinued operations Profit (loss) for the year 2020 52,601 18,124 (7,588) - 10,536 10,831 7 (2,524) (2,123) 11 % 16,727 (11) 16,716 2019 67,842 17,484 (6,864) (568) 10,052 (63) 2 (1,135) (2,756) 31 % 6,100 (56) 6,044 % (22 %) 4 % 11 % n.a. 5 % n.a. 250 % 122 % (23 %) (20 %p) 174 % (80 %) 177 % distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses mentioned above. Profit for the year from continuing operations Profit for the year from continuing operations totalled DKK 16.7 billion, DKK 10.6 billion higher than in 2019. The increase was primarily due to the divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses. EBITDA, % Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy 12 % 6 % DKK 18.1 bn 82 % EBITDA, DKKbn 17.5 18.1 In 2020, regulated and quasi-regulated activities and contracted activities accounted for 71 % and 19 % of our EBITDA, respectively, whereas market- exposed activities accounted for 10 %. Read more about profit for the year from discontinued operations in note 3.7. 2019 2020 EBITDA increased by 4 %. No new partnerships in 2019 and 2020. 40 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Results Contents Cash flows and net debt Cash flows from operating activities Cash flows from operating activities totalled DKK 16.5 billion in 2020 compared to DKK 13.1 billion in 2019. The increase of DKK 3.4 billion was mainly due to lower paid taxes in Denmark, tax equity contributions from our partners in the onshore wind farms Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek, lower trade receivables due to lower revenue, and the divestment of the offshore transmis- sion assets at Walney Extension. This was part- ly offset by 2019 being positively affected by received milestone payments related to the construction of Hornsea 1 and the divestment of the Race Bank transmission assets. In 2020, we had a net cash outflow from work in progress of DKK 1.6 billion. This was mainly due to supplier payments related to the construction of Hornsea 1 for partners and construction of the offshore transmission asset at Hornsea 2, partly offset by the divest- ment of the offshore transmission assets at Walney Extension. Investments and divestments Gross investments amounted to DKK 27.0 billion against DKK 23.3 billion in 2019. The main investments in 2020 were: – offshore wind farms (DKK 19.5 billion), including Borssele 1 & 2 in the Netherlands, Greater Changhua 1 & 2a in Taiwan, Hornsea 2 in the UK, and Ocean Wind 1 in the US – onshore wind and solar farms (DKK 6.6 billion), including Permian Energy Center, Muscle Shoals, Western Trail, Sage Draw, Plum Creek, Willow Creek, and Haystack in the US – Markets & Bioenergy (DKK 0.7 billion), mainly related to maintenance of the power distribution grid. Cash flow from divestments in 2020 related mainly to the divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses. The transaction resulted in proceeds of DKK 20.5 billion. Furthermore, we received minor proceeds regarding the divestment of our 10 MW Oak Solar Farm in New Jersey and our Inbicon production facili- ties. This was partly offset by a cash outflow in connection with the divestment of the LNG activities of DKK 1.5 billion and compensations paid under our partnership agreements. Cash flow from divestments in 2019 related to the receipt of deferred proceeds from the farm-down of 50 % of Hornsea 1 in 2018 (DKK 1.7 billion) and to the strengthening of our strategic partnership with Eversource, as they became a 50 % partner in our activities in the New England area in February 2019 (DKK 1.4 billion). Interest-bearing net debt Interest-bearing net debt totalled DKK 12.3 billion at the end of 2020 against DKK 17.2 billion at the end of 2019. The DKK 4.9 billion decrease was mainly due to a positive free cash flow of DKK 8.5 billion from continuing operations and a positive cash flow from discontinued operations where we have received deferred proceeds of USD 150 million from INEOS regarding the Oil & Gas divestment in 2017. These positive cash flow effects were only partly offset by dividends and hybrid coupon payments of DKK 5.2 billion. Cash flows and net debt, DKKm Cash flows from operating activities EBITDA Change in derivatives Change in provisions Reversal of gain (loss) on divestment of assets Other items Interest paid and similar items, net Paid tax Change in work in progress Change in tax equity liabilities Change in other working capital Gross investments Divestments Free cash flow Net debt at 1 January Free cash flow from continuing operations Free cash flow from discontinued operations Interest-bearing receivables re Oil & Gas divestment Dividends and hybrid coupons paid Addition of leasing obligations Exchange rate adjustments, etc. Net debt at 31 December Key ratios, DKKm, % ROCE Adjusted net debt FFO/adjusted net debt Gain (loss) on sale of assets is part of EBITDA, but is presented as part of the ‘divestment’ cash flow. The EBITDA effect is thus reversed in the specification of cash flows from operating activities. 2020 16,466 18,124 411 (772) (805) (42) (1,830) (1,118) (1,613) 2,958 1,153 2019 13,079 17,484 (1,040) 727 101 86 (1,049) (4,800) 1,417 630 (477) (26,967) (23,305) 19,039 8,538 17,230 3,329 (6,897) (2,219) (8,538) 6,897 % 26 % 4 % n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 74 % (77 %) n.a. 370 % n.a. 16 % 472 % n.a. n.a. n.a. (966) (174) 455 % 342 5,239 934 (1,898) 12,343 2020 9.7 % 26,308 48.3 % 340 5,016 5,873 1,497 1 % 4 % (84 %) n.a. 17,230 (28 %) 2019 10.6 % 30,575 31.0 % % (1 %p) (14 %) 17 %p ROCE and FFO/adjusted net debt is specified in notes 2.1 and 6.1. 41 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Results Contents Equity and capital employed ESG results Equity Equity was DKK 97.3 billion at the end of the year against DKK 89.6 billion at the end of 2019. Capital employed Capital employed was DKK 109.7 billion at 31 December 2020 against DKK 106.8 billion at the end of 2019. The increase was mainly due to investments, partly offset by the divested capital employed regarding the Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses. Financial ratios Return on capital employed (ROCE) Return on capital employed was 9.7 % in 2020 against 10.6 % in 2019. The slight decrease was mainly attributable to the higher average capital employed, only partly offset by higher EBIT. Credit metric (FFO/adjusted net debt) The funds from operations (FFO)/adjusted net debt credit metric was 48 % at the end of 2020 against 31 % in 2019. Green share of heat and power generation The green share of heat and power generation amounted to 90 % in 2020, up 4 percentage points compared to last year. The increase mainly came from higher generation from offshore and onshore wind farms due to additional capacity and higher wind speeds. This was partly offset by an increase from ancillary services from our coal-fuelled units as we are legally obliged to deliver these services with the lowest marginal costs. Greenhouse gas emissions The greenhouse gas intensity from our heat and power generation and other operating activities (scopes 1 and 2) decreased to 58 g CO2e/kWh in 2020 against 65 g CO2e/kWh in 2019. The emissions per kWh decreased for the same reasons as mentioned above. Greenhouse gas emissions from our supply chain and sales activities (scope 3) decreased by 27 % to 25.3 million tonnes in 2020, driven by a 28 % decrease in gas sales. Safety In 2020, we have had 77 total recordable injuries (TRIs), of which 58 injuries were related to our contractors’ employees. This was a decrease of 29 injuries compared to 2019, equalling a 27 % reduction. The number of hours worked was 21.5 million hours, 1 % more than in 2019. Consequently, the total recordable injury rate (TRIR) over the last year decreased from 4.9 in 2019 to 3.6 in 2020. Capital employed, % Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy 5 % 12 % DKK 109.7 bn 83 % Amazon Wind Farm, Scurry County, Texas, the US. 42 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Results Contents Five-year summary Income statement (business performance), DKKm Revenue EBITDA Offshore Sites, O&M, and PPAs Construction agreements and divestment gains Other, incl. project development Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Other activities Depreciation and amortisation Impairment losses Operating profit (loss) (EBIT) Gain (loss) on divestment of enterprises Net financial income and expenses Profit (loss) before tax Tax Profit (loss) for the year from continuing operations Profit (loss) for the year Balance sheet Assets Total equity Shareholders in Ørsted A/S Non-controlling interests Hybrid capital Interest-bearing net debt Capital employed Additions to property, plant, and equipment Cash flows Cash flows from operating activities Gross investments Divestments Free cash flow Financial ratios Return on capital employed (ROCE)1, % FFO/adjusted net debt2, % Number of outstanding shares, 31 December, '000 Share price, 31 December, DKK Market capitalisation, 31 December, DKKbn Earnings per share (EPS) (BP), DKK Dividend yield, % Income statement (IFRS) Revenue EBITDA Profit (loss) for the year from continuing operations 2020 52,601 18,124 14,750 15,476 1,593 (2,319) 1,131 2,136 107 (7,588) - 10,536 10,831 (2,524) 18,850 (2,123) 16,727 16,716 196,719 97,329 81,376 2,721 13,232 12,343 109,672 28,442 16,466 (26,967) 19,039 8,538 9.7 48.3 420,068 1,244 522 38.8 0.9 2019 67,842 17,484 15,161 13,750 3,765 (2,354) 786 1,495 42 (6,864) (568) 10,052 (63) (1,135) 8,856 (2,756) 6,100 6,044 192,860 89,562 73,082 3,248 13,232 17,230 106,792 22,440 13,079 (23,305) 3,329 (6,897) 10.6 31.0 419,985 689 290 12.7 1.5 2018 76,946 30,029 28,046 11,279 18,765 (1,998) 44 2,100 (161) (5,978) 603 24,654 127 (1,278) 23,504 (4,018) 19,486 19,496 174,575 85,115 68,488 3,388 13,239 (2,219) 82,896 14,436 10,343 (24,481) 19,950 5,812 32.1 69.0 420,045 436 183 45.3 2.2 2017 59,504 22,519 20,595 8,529 13,667 (1,601) - 2,234 (310) (5,739) (545) 16,235 (139) (1,042) 15,044 (1,765) 13,279 20,199 146,521 71,837 54,791 3,807 13,239 (1,517) 70,320 20,022 1,023 (17,744) 16,982 261 25.2 50.3 420,155 339 142 46.4 2.7 2016 61,201 19,109 11,867 5,869 7,012 (1,014) - 7,208 34 (5,232) - 13,877 1,250 (767) 14,352 (2,191) 12,161 13,213 136,489 57,500 39,106 5,146 13,248 3,461 60,961 17,750 11,272 (14,960) 9,055 5,367 24.4 64.2 420,155 268 113 30.6 2.2 50,151 16,598 15,548 70,398 19,020 7,291 75,520 28,491 18,266 59,709 22,574 13,321 57,393 16,939 10,467 Business drivers 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Offshore Decided (FID) and installed capacity3, offshore wind, GW Installed capacity, offshore wind3, GW Generation capacity, offshore wind3, GW Wind speed3, m/s Load factor3, % Availability3, % Power generation, TWh Power sales, TWh Onshore Decided (FID) and installed capacity3, onshore, GW Installed capacity, GW Wind speed, m/s Load factor, % Availability3, % Power generation, TWh Markets & Bioenergy Degree days3, number Heat generation, TWh Power generation, TWh Power sales, TWh Gas sales, TWh People and environment Employees (FTE), end of year, number Total recordable injury rate (TRIR) Fatalities, number Green share of heat and power generation, % Carbon emissions, g CO2e/kWh (scopes 1 & 2) Carbon emissions, Mtonnes (scope 3) Business performance versus IFRS Business performance represents the underlying financial performance of the Group in the reporting period, as results are adjusted for temporary fluctuations in the market value of contracts (including hedging transactions) relating to other periods. Apart from this, there is no difference between business performance and IFRS results. Read more in note 1.6. The EBITDA split between business units in the comparative years 2016-2017 has not been updated to reflect that earnings from trading related to hedging of our power exposures and power portfolio optimisation activities in relation to Offshore are presented in this business unit from 2018 (previously Markets & Bioenergy). 9.9 7.6 4.4 9.7 45 94 15.2 29.2 3.4 1.7 7.6 45 96 5.7 2,432 6.7 4.4 11.6 90.3 6,179 3.6 0 90 58 25.3 9.9 6.8 3.6 9.2 42 93 12.0 27.6 2.1 1.0 7.3 45 98 3.5 2,399 8.3 4.6 14.7 125.0 6,526 4.9 1 86 65 34.6 9.0 5.6 3.0 9.1 42 93 10.0 27.4 1.0 0.8 7.3 41 98 0.6 2,526 8.8 6.7 15.3 131.1 6,080 4.7 0 75 131 36.2 8.9 3.9 2.5 9.3 44 93 8.5 - - - - - - - 2,705 9.0 8.2 31.7 129.0 5,638 6.4 0 64 151 n.a. 7.4 3.6 2.0 8.9 41 92 6.0 - - - - - - - 2,715 9.2 8.4 32.9 143.4 5,775 6.8 0 50 224 n.a. 1 EBIT/average capital employed. 2 Net debt, including 50 % of hybrid capital, cash and securities not available for use (with the exception of repo transactions), present value of lease obligations (2016-2018), and decommissioning obligations less deferred tax. See definition on page 192 and in the ESG statements. The figures indicate values from the latest regulatory financial statements (updated in June). 3 4 43 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Results Contents Fourth quarter Financial performance – Group from the divested Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses. Revenue Revenue in Q4 2020 decreased by 17 % relative to Q4 2019 and amounted to DKK 15.6 billion. The lower revenue was mainly driven by significantly lower gas volumes sold and by construction agreements due to divestment of the transmission assets at Race Bank in Q4 2019, partly offset by increase in our wind- based power generation. EBITDA Operating profit (EBITDA) totalled DKK 5.0 billion compared to DKK 4.6 billion in Q4 2019. The increase was mainly driven by ramp-up from new offshore and onshore wind farms in oper- ation, which increased by 9 %, and higher wind speeds. In addition, the divested LNG activities contributed positively year on year as the provision in Q4 2019 was not repeated. This was partly offset by lower earnings from trading related to hedging of our power exposure and power portfolio optimisation activities, which had high earnings in Q4 2019, and from our gas portfolio where the net positive effect from revaluation of our gas at storage and storage hedges was higher in Q4 2019 than Q4 2020. Furthermore, EBITDA from partnerships contributed negatively, due to minor updates regarding finalised construction projects. In addition, we had lower earnings We also saw adverse COVID-19 impacts on especially the UK power market due to a lower demand for electricity, which led to lower ROC recycle prices and higher balancing tariffs (BSUoS) from National Grid. Profit from continuing operations Profit from continuing operations increased by DKK 1.2 billion to DKK 2.2 billion. The increase was mainly due to the higher EBITDA and impairment losses in Q4 2019. Cash flows from operating activities Cash flows from operating activities totalled DKK 6.8 billion in Q4 2020 compared to DKK 4.8 billion in Q4 2019. The increase of DKK 1.9 billion was mainly due to lower receivables at the end of 2020 compared to 2019 and an early repayment related to our oil pipe facilities in Q4 2020. Investments and divestments Gross investments amounted to DKK 8.6 billion in Q4 2020. The main investments related to Hornsea 2, Greater Changhua 1 & 2a, Permian Energy Center, Muscle Shoals, Western Trail, and Haystack. Cash flow from divestments was a cash outflow of DKK 1.5 billion and mainly related to the divestment of the LNG activities. Financial performance, DKKm Revenue EBITDA Operating profit (loss) (EBIT) Profit (loss) before tax Tax Profit (loss) for the period from continuing operations Profit (loss) for the period from discontinued operations Profit (loss) for the period Cash flows and net debt, DKKm Cash flows from operating activites EBITDA Change in derivatives Change in provisions Reversal of gain (loss) on divestment of assets Other items Interest expenses, net Paid tax Change in work in progress Change in tax equity liabilities Change in other working capital Gross investments Divestments Free cash flow Net debt, beginning of period Free cash flow from continuing operations Free cash flow from discontinued operations Interest-bearing receivables re Oil & Gas divestment Dividends and hybrid coupon paid Addition to lease obligations Exchange rate adjustments, etc. Net debt, end of period Q4 2020 Q4 2019 % 15,559 18,679 (17 %) 5,003 3,091 2,343 (169) 2,174 15 2,189 4,613 2,169 1,515 (590) 925 (29) 896 Q4 2020 Q4 2019 6,756 5,003 703 (288) 451 (31) (237) 239 486 (310) 740 (8,639) (1,519) (3,402) 8,216 3,402 (40) - 208 695 (138) 12,343 4,816 4,613 (352) 934 416 (10) (262) 57 236 (197) (619) (8,816) 402 (3,598) 12,082 3,598 28 13 283 145 1,081 17,230 8 % 43 % 55 % (71 %) 135 % n.a. 144 % % 40 % 8 % n.a. n.a. 8 % 210 % (10 %) 319 % 106 % 57 % n.a. (2 %) n.a. (5 %) (32 %) (5 %) n.a. n.a. (27 %) 379 % n.a. (28 %) 44 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Results Contents For more details on quarterly figures for our business units, please go to orsted.com/ financial-reports Financial performance – business units to minor updates regarding finalised construction projects. Offshore Power generation increased by 23 % relative to Q4 2019. The increase was primarily due to ramp-up of generation from Hornsea 1 and Borssele 1 & 2. Wind speeds amounted to a portfolio average of 10.4 m/s which was higher than in Q4 2019, but slightly lower than nor- mal wind speeds (10.5 m/s). Availability ended at 94 %, which was 1 percentage point higher than in Q4 2019. Revenue from offshore wind farms in operation increased by 8 % due to the above- mentioned ramp-up from new wind farms. Revenue from power sales increased by DKK 1.2 billion due to higher power prices and higher volumes sold during the quarter. Revenue from construction agreements was limited in Q4 2020 and mainly related to the construction of Coastal Virginia Wind. In Q4 2019, it primarily related to the divestment of the transmission assets at Race Bank. EBITDA increased by DKK 0.1 billion relative to Q4 2019 and amounted to DKK 4.1 billion. EBITDA from sites, O&M, and PPAs amounted to DKK 5.0 billion, up 7 % compared to Q4 2019, driven by higher generation. The increase was partly offset by adverse COVID-19 impacts and lower earnings from trading related to hedging of our UK energy exposure, which had very high earnings in Q4 2019. EBITDA from partnerships amounted to DKK -0.1 billion in Q4 2020, mainly due Onshore Power generation increased by 84 % relative to Q4 2019. The increase was primarily due to new onshore wind farms in operation (Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek). Wind speeds across the portfolio amounted to 8.0 m/s, which was higher than in the same period last year and a normal fourth quarter (7.7 m/s). Revenue from wind farms in operation in- creased by 41 % due to the above-mentioned factors, partly offset by lower prices for the part of the portfolio not covered by PPAs and a lower positive effect from derivate run-offs related to the acquisition of LCE back in 2018. EBITDA almost doubled to DKK 0.3 billion, primarily due to more wind farms in operation. Markets & Bioenergy Revenue decreased by 40 % and amounted to DKK 5.8 billion compared to Q4 2019. The decrease was mainly due to significantly lower gas and power volumes sold. EBITDA totalled DKK 0.6 billion in Q4 2020, which was DKK 0.2 billion higher than in Q4 2019. EBITDA from CHP plants was in line with last year and amounted to DKK 0.3 billion. EBITDA from Gas Markets & Infrastructure decreased by DKK 0.2 billion and amounted to DKK 0.4 billion. The lower earnings were related to our gas portfolio where the net positive effect from revaluation of our gas at storage and stor- age hedges was higher in Q4 2019 than Q4 2020. Offshore’s results, DKKm Q4 2020 Q4 2019 Revenue 10,799 10,913 Sites, O&M, and PPAs Power sales Construction agreements Other EBITDA Sites, O&M, and PPAs Construction agreements and divestment gains Other, incl. project development Cash flows from operating activities Free cash flow 5,891 4,603 122 183 4,128 4,950 (149) (673) 7,111 1,329 5,437 3,397 2,012 67 4,048 4,626 51 (629) Onshore’s results, DKKm Q4 2020 Q4 2019 Revenue EBITDA Sites Production tax credits and tax attributes Other, incl. project development Cash flows from operating activities 173 324 99 314 (89) 134 123 165 73 201 (109) (160) Free cash flow (2,556) (2,822) % (1 %) 8 % 36 % (94 %) 173 % 2 % 7 % n.a. 7 % n.a. % 41 % 96 % 36 % 56 % (18 %) n.a. (9 %) 3,545 101 % (1,697) Markets & Bioenergy’s results DKKm Revenue EBITDA CHP plants Gas Markets & Infrastructure LNG Distribution, B2C, and city light Other, incl. project development Cash flows from operating activities Free cash flow Q4 2020 Q4 2019 % 5,755 9,569 (40 %) 643 346 389 - - (92) (401) (2,090) 490 354 620 (691) 257 (50) (280) (739) 31 % (2 %) (37 %) n.a. n.a. 84 % 43 % 183 % 45 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Results Contents Quarterly summary, 2019-2020 Income statement (business performance), DKKm Revenue EBITDA Offshore Sites, O&M, and PPAs Construction agreements and divestment gains Other, incl. project development Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Other activities Depreciation and amortisation Impairment losses Operating profit (loss) (EBIT) Gain (loss) on divestment of enterprises Net financial income and expenses Profit (loss) before tax Tax Profit (loss) for the period from continuing operations Profit (loss) for the period Balance sheet Assets Total equity Shareholders in Ørsted A/S Non-controlling interests Hybrid capital Interest-bearing net debt Capital employed Additions to property, plant, and equipment Cash flows Cash flows from operating activities Gross investments Divestments Free cash flow Financial ratios Return on capital employed (ROCE)1,5, % FFO/Adjusted net debt2,5, % Number of outstanding shares, end of period, ’000 Share price, end of period, DKK Market capitalisation, end of period, DKKbn Earnings per share (EPS) (BP), DKK Income statement (IFRS) Revenue EBITDA Profit (loss) for the period from continuing operations Q4 2020 Q3 2020 Q2 2020 Q1 2020 Q4 2019 Q3 2019 Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Business drivers Q4 2020 Q3 2020 Q2 2020 Q1 2020 Q4 2019 Q3 2019 Q2 2019 Q1 2019 15,559 5,003 4,128 4,950 (149) (673) 324 643 (92) (1,912) - 3,091 (291) (456) 2,343 (169) 10,041 3,360 2,629 3,012 247 (630) 308 375 48 (2,095) - 1,265 11,139 (282) 12,124 (108) 11,625 2,956 2,361 2,578 396 (613) 312 185 98 (1,827) - 1,129 (3) (1,010) 119 (928) 15,376 6,805 5,632 4,936 1099 (403) 187 933 53 (1,754) - 5,051 (14) (776) 4,264 (918) 18,679 4,613 4,048 4,626 51 (629) 165 490 (90) (1,876) (568) 2,169 (13) (644) 1,515 (590) 15,481 4,116 3,223 2,612 1188 (577) 308 436 149 (1,681) - 2,435 (15) (47) 2,368 (925) 16,443 3,625 3,572 2,552 1638 (618) 162 (115) 6 (1,689) - 1,936 (18) (545) 1,376 (283) 17,239 5,130 4,318 3,960 888 (530) 151 684 (23) (1,618) - 3,512 (17) 101 3,597 (958) 2,174 2,189 12,016 12,034 (809) (825) 3,346 3,318 925 896 1,443 1,477 1,093 1,075 2,639 2,596 196,719 194,567 193,124 193,636 192,860 194,521 185,949 182,783 85,843 69,193 3,411 13,239 9,111 94,954 89,562 85,930 73,082 69,789 3,248 2,909 13,232 13,232 17,230 22,272 109,672 104,688 108,203 116,098 106,792 86,446 69,960 3,247 13,239 4,980 91,426 87,369 70,977 3,153 13,239 12,082 99,451 96,472 80,450 2,790 13,232 8,216 97,329 81,376 2,721 13,232 12,343 89,015 72,728 3,055 13,232 27,084 8,121 5,477 10,011 4,833 6,560 8,449 3,755 3,676 6,756 (8,639) (1,519) (3,402) 1,941 (9,263) 20,506 13,184 8,197 (3,757) 45 4,485 (428) (5,308) 7 (5,729) 4,816 (8,816) 402 (3,598) 871 (7,222) 260 (6,091) 7,510 (3,368) (11) 4,131 (118) (3,899) 2,678 (1,339) 9.7 48.3 9.4 35.6 10.8 23.1 11.0 21.3 10.6 31.0 29.3 47.4 29.3 57.5 28.2 46.2 420,068 420,066 420,066 419,985 419,985 419,985 419,985 420,045 504 1,244 875 765 666 689 637 533 522 4.9 368 28.6 321 (2.7) 280 8.0 290 1.1 267 3.5 224 1.9 212 6.2 Offshore Decided (FID) and installed capacity3, GW Installed capacity3, GW Generation capacity3, GW Wind speed3, m/s Load factor3, % Availability3, % Power generation, TWh Power sales, TWh Onshore Decided (FID) and installed capacity3, GW Installed capacity, onshore wind, GW Wind speed3, m/s Load factor3, % Availability3, % Power generation, TWh Markets & Bioenergy Degree days3, number Heat generation, TWh Power generation, TWh Power sales, TWh Gas sales, TWh People and environment Employees, end of period, number Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)5 Fatalities, number Green share of heat and power generation, % Carbon emissions, g CO2e/kWh (scopes 1 & 2) Carbon emissions, Mtonnes (scope 3) 9.9 7.6 4.4 10.4 53 94 4.8 8.6 3.4 1.7 8.0 50 95 1.8 825 2.3 1.3 2.6 20.3 9.9 6.8 4.1 8.2 35 94 3.2 6.3 2.7 1.7 6.7 36 97 1.2 106 0.3 0.6 2.4 23.2 9.9 6.8 3.8 8.0 32 95 2.6 5.5 2.1 1.6 8.0 49 96 1.6 436 1.0 0.9 3.0 20.1 6,179 3.6 0 6,120 3.8 0 6,731 3.7 0 93 34 5.9 90 83 6.3 86 84 5.5 9.9 6.8 3.6 12.1 60 93 4.6 8.8 2.1 1.3 7.5 44 95 1.1 1,065 3.1 1.6 3.6 26.7 6,608 3.6 0 90 53 7.6 9.9 6.8 3.6 10.0 50 93 3.9 7.7 2.1 1.0 7.3 46 98 1.0 882 3.0 1.6 4.1 36.7 6,526 4.9 0 90 44 10.7 9.9 5.6 3.6 8.5 37 93 2.8 7.0 1.7 1.0 6.6 39 98 0.9 108 0.5 0.4 3.3 30.8 9.9 5.6 3.3 8.0 31 87 2.2 5.7 1.4 0.8 7.7 47 97 0.8 269 1.1 0.7 3.3 31.7 6,454 4.7 0 6,312 4.0 1 87 62 8.2 85 71 8.4 9.0 5.6 3.0 10.4 51 96 3.1 7.2 1.0 0.8 7.8 47 97 0.8 1,140 3.7 1.9 4.0 25.8 6,176 4.4 0 80 85 7.3 Business performance versus IFRS Business performance represents the underlying financial performance of the Group in the reporting period, as results are adjusted for temporary fluctuations in the market value of contracts (including hedging trans- actions) relating to other periods. Apart from this, there is no difference between business performance and IFRS results. Read more in note 1.6. 1 2 3 4 5 EBIT/average capital employed. Net debt, including 50 % of hybrid capital, cash and securities not available for use (with the exception of repo transactions), and decommissioning obliga- tions less deferred tax. See definition on page 192 and in the ESG statements. The figures indicate values from the latest regulatory financial statements (updated in June). Year to date. 13,195 3,102 8,762 2,455 9,962 1,592 18,232 9,449 19,815 5,260 14,543 3,328 17,277 4,425 18,763 6,007 ROCE is calculated for continuing operations. 700 11,311 (1,870) 5,407 1,429 822 1,718 3,322 46 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Contents Business units 48 Our business units 49 Offshore 54 Onshore 57 Markets & Bioenergy Trading power and commodities means we can actively manage market risk for our generating assets and for contracts. For instance, our energy traders like Tom, who works in Gentofte, buy and sell energy at just the right moment to manage price fluctuations caused by, among other things, wind, snow, rain, and sun. Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents Our business units Ørsted EBITDA1 2019 2020 Offshore EBITDA1 2019 Onshore EBITDA1 2019 DKK 17.5 bn DKK 15.2 bn DKK 0.8 bn 2020 2020 DKK 18.1 bn DKK 14.8 bn DKK 1.1 bn Markets & Bioenergy EBITDA1 2019 DKK 1.5 bn 2020 DKK 2.1 bn From operating wind farms Key figures 2020 Revenue Gross investments Capital employed TRIR Number of employees ROCE DKK 52.6 bn DKK 27.0 bn DKK 109.7 bn 3.6 6,179 9.7 % Financial target ROCE 10 % (avg. 2019-2025) Key figures 2020 Revenue Gross investments Capital employed TRIR Number of employees DKK 34.5 bn DKK 19.5 bn DKK 90.6 bn 3.5 3,078 Key figures 2020 Revenue Gross investments Capital employed TRIR Number of employees DKK 0.7 bn DKK 6.6 bn DKK 12.9 bn 2.2 140 Key figures 2020 Revenue Gross investments Capital employed TRIR Number of employees DKK 21.4 bn DKK 0.7 bn DKK 5.2 bn 7.5 1,009 1 The sum of the business units’ key figures for 2020 does not equal the consolidated key figures due to other activities and eliminations. Read more in note 2.1. 48 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents Offshore Highlights 2020 Introduction to Offshore Operations We commissioned Borssele 1 & 2 and com- pleted the construction of the demonstration project Coastal Virginia Wind. We have kept availability high across our operating portfolio during the COVID-19 pandemic. Business development We installed our offshore wind turbine number 1,500. We selected Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE) as the preferred wind turbine supplier for our offshore wind farms Borkum Riffgrund 3 and Gode Wind 3. We entered into the world’s largest renewables CPPA with Taiwan-based TSMC who will buy electricity from our offshore wind farm Greater Changhua 2b & 4. We signed CPPAs with Nestlé UK and Amazon who will buy electricity from our offshore wind farms Race Bank and Borkum Riffgrund 3, respectively. Walney Extension, off the coast of Cumbria, the UK. Ørsted develops, constructs, owns, and operates offshore wind farms in the UK, Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands, the US, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea. Since we built the world’s first off- shore wind farm in 1991, we have been pioneers of offshore wind, and with almost 30 years of experience, we have constructed more offshore wind farms than any other company. We are market leader in all regions where we operate, with a total installed capacity of 7.6 GW. Ørsted has 28 offshore wind farms in operation that supply carbon-free power to more than 18 million people worldwide. Our integrated EPC organisation has a strong track record of delivering projects on time and within budget and manages multiple large-scale offshore construction projects in parallel across the globe. We are pursuing growth opportunities in renewable hydrogen in the UK and Continental Europe. 49 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents We entered into agreements to divest 25 % of Ocean Wind 1 to Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) and 50 % of the project Greater Changhua 1 to CDPQ and Cathay PE. winds in Q1 2020. Availability was 94 %, which was 1 percentage point higher than in 2019. EBITDA from ‘Sites, O&M, and PPAs’ increased by 13 %. We divested the transmission assets of our offshore wind farm Walney Extension. We established a joint venture with TEPCO to develop projects on the eastern coast of Japan. We have started developing a project in South Korea with a capacity of up to 1.6 GW. In renewable hydrogen, we took FID on the H2RES project and secured funding for the OYSTER, Gigastack, and Westküste 100 projects. We launched three new renewable hydrogen projects: Green Fuels for Denmark and our partnerships with Yara and bp. Financial performance 2020 Power generation increased by 27 % relative to 2019, primarily due to ramp-up of gen- eration from Hornsea 1 and Borssele 1 & 2 (in total 1.6 TWh) and higher wind speeds, mainly in Q1 2020. This was partly offset by hours with negative prices from April to July due to a lower demand for electricity driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, which led us to temporarily shut down generation. Wind speeds were above last year and amounted to a portfolio average of 9.7 m/s, up from 9.2 m/s in 2019 and above a normal wind year (9.3 m/s), mainly due to very strong Revenue decreased by 14 % to DKK 34.5 billion. The decrease compared to 2019 was driven by revenue from construction agreements decreasing by DKK 9.0 billion, primarily due to high activity in 2019 related to the con- struction of the offshore wind farm Hornsea 1 for partners and the divestment of the offshore transmission assets at Race Bank. In 2020, revenue from construction agree- ments primarily related to the divestment of the offshore transmission assets at Walney Extension, construction of Coastal Virginia Wind, and the finalisation of Hornsea 1. This was partly offset by revenue from off- shore wind farms in operation increasing by 17 % to DKK 19.4 billion, mainly due to higher generation. EBITDA decreased by 3 % relative to 2019 and amounted to DKK 14.8 billion. EBITDA from Sites, O&M, and PPAs amounted to DKK 15.5 billion in 2020. The 13 % increase was primarily due to the above-mentioned ramp-up of Hornsea 1 and Borssele 1 & 2, receipt of CfDs of another 400 MW of Hornsea 1 from April, and higher wind speeds. The increase was partly offset by adverse COVID-19 impacts on especially the UK power market due to a lower demand for electricity, which led to hours with negative prices from April to July, lower ROC recycle prices, and higher balancing tariffs (BSUoS) from National Grid in 2020. Furthermore, we saw lower earnings from trading related to hedging of our UK energy exposure, which Performance highlights 2020 2019 % Business drivers Decided (FID) and installed capacity Installed capacity Generation capacity Wind speed Load factor Availability GW GW GW m/s % % 9.9 7.6 4.4 9.7 45 94 9.9 6.8 3.6 9.2 42 93 Power generation TWh 15.2 12.0 0 % 11 % 21 % 5 % 3 %p 1 %p 27 % 0 % 27 % 5 % n.a. (50 %) 6 % (16 %) (1 %) (14 %) 17 % 2 % (73 %) 151 % (3 %) 13 % 2.2 9.4 2.3 1.2 0.1 29.2 36.8 8.4 34,533 19,427 11,255 3,371 480 14,750 15,476 2.2 7.4 2.2 - 0.2 27.6 43.6 8.5 40,216 16,602 11,037 12,386 191 15,161 13,750 1,593 3,765 (58 %) (2,319) (6,106) 8,644 (2,354) (5,494) 9,667 9,985 9,283 (19,525) (15,121) (149) (9,689) 90,613 3,052 (2,786) 79,447 (1 %) 11 % (11 %) 8 % 29 % n.a. 248 % 14 % 50 / 193 Denmark United Kingdom Germany The Netherlands Other Power sales Power price, LEBA UK British pounds Financial performance TWh GBP/MWh DKK/GBP Revenue DKKm Sites, O&M, and PPAs Power sales Construction agreements Other EBITDA Sites, O&M, and PPA Construction agreements and divestment gains Other, incl. project development Depreciation EBIT Cash flows from operating activities Gross investments Divestments Free cash flow Capital employed DKKm DKKm DKKm DKKm DKKm DKKm DKKm DKKm Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents the construction of Hornsea 1 for partners and construction of the offshore transmis- sion assets at Hornsea 2, partly offset by the divestment of the offshore transmission assets at Walney Extension. Gross investments amounted to DKK 19.5 billion and mainly related to the construction of Borssele 1 & 2, Greater Changhua 1 & 2a, Hornsea 2, and Ocean Wind 1. Cash flow from divestments in 2020 related to compensations paid under partnership agreements. In 2019, cash flow from divest- ments related to the receipt of deferred proceeds from the 50 % farm-down of Hornsea 1 in 2018 (DKK 1.7 billion) and to the strengthening of our strategic partnership with Eversource, as they became a 50 % partner in our activities in the New England area in the US in 2019 (DKK 1.4 billion). Strategic and operational performance 2020 Our Offshore business delivered a strong performance in 2020, despite the challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. We commissioned our construction projects on schedule and within budget and achieved a park availability of 93.7 % across the portfolio, with Borssele 1 & 2 delivering a park availabili- ty of 97.4 % since May 2020. had very high earnings in 2019. Excluding earnings previously reported as part of Markets & Bioenergy, EBITDA from Sites, O&M, and PPAs increased by 17 %. EBITDA from partnerships decreased by DKK 2.2 billion and amounted to DKK 1.6 billion. In 2020, our earnings from construction agreements mainly related to the lowered assumptions regarding the preferred bidder’s expected return requirement on the Hornsea 1 transmission asset, the construction of Coastal Virginia Wind, and minor updates regarding finalised construction projects. In 2019, earnings from construction agree- ments primarily concerned Hornsea 1. EBITDA from other activities, including project development, amounted to DKK -2.3 billion, in line with last year, and mainly related to our project development activities in the US. Total expensed project development costs amounted to DKK 1.7 billion. Depreciation increased 11 % and amounted to DKK 6.1 billion. The increase was mainly due to completion of Hornsea 1 and Borssele 1 & 2. Cash flow from operating activities amounted to DKK 10.0 billion, which was DKK 0.7 billion higher than in 2019. The increase was primari- ly due to less paid tax in 2020 relative to 2019. This was partly offset by funds tied up in work in progress in 2020 versus a release in 2019. In 2020, we had a net cash outflow from work in progress of DKK 1.6 billion. This was mainly due to supplier payments related to Quarterly and annual wind speeds for our offshore wind farms, m/s 2017 Normal wind year 2018 2019 2020 12.1 10.4 8.0 8.0 8.5 8.2 10.0 10.4 9.3 9.1 9.2 9.7 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY The wind speeds indicate how many metres per second the wind has blown in the areas where we have offshore wind farms. The weighting is based on our generation capacity. our strategic ambition of 15 GW of installed off- shore wind capacity by 2025. With our current portfolio of projects under construction and awarded, we have nearly reached this target. The UK In the UK, we are building the offshore wind farm Hornsea 2, which is our construction project most affected by COVID-19. However, we do not expect this to delay commission- ing, and we anticipate the project to stay within the budget set at FID. Currently, we are installing foundations and array cables, and we expect the project to be completed in the first half of 2022. In December, we were granted consent to move into the final development phase of the offshore wind farm Hornsea 3 by the UK Secre- tary of State for the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. The offshore wind farm has a potential capacity of more than 2.4 GW and is adjacent to our offshore wind farms Hornsea 1 and Hornsea 2, off the east coast of the UK. With the consent granted, the offshore wind farm Hornsea 3 will be able to enter the next UK auction round for a contract for difference (CfD). Finally, we divested the offshore transmission assets of Walney Extension to Diamond Transmission Partners. The transmission assets were sold for GBP 447 million 100 % basis and included the onshore substation, the export cables, and the offshore substations. In the first half of 2021, we expect to divest the transmission assets of Hornsea 1. 51 / 193 In June, we reached a significant milestone with the installation of Ørsted’s offshore wind turbine number 1,500. We are set to more than double our offshore wind capacity in the com- ing five years, and we are well on track to meet In April, we signed a 15-year CPPA with Nestlé UK who will buy 31 MW of the output of our offshore wind farm Race Bank which has a to- tal capacity of 573 MW. This is Ørsted’s largest, long-term, fixed-price CPPA in the UK. Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents Continental Europe In Continental Europe, we commissioned the offshore wind farm Borssele 1 & 2 on time and on budget. Borssele 1 & 2 is currently the largest offshore wind farm in the Netherlands and added 752 MW to our installed capacity. In addition, we signed a 10-year CPPA with Amazon who will offtake 250 MW of Borkum Riffgrund 3 Offshore Wind Farm’s total capacity of 900 MW. This was our first offshore wind CPPA with a global tech company and the larg- est offshore wind CPPA in Europe. Furthermore, we selected SGRE as the preferred wind turbine supplier for our projects Borkum Riffgrund 3 and Gode Wind 3. Subject to final investment decisions, which we expect by the end of 2021, assuming the necessary consents are received, the projects will deploy SGRE’s 11 MW wind turbine with a 200-metre rotor. North America In the US, we completed construction of the 12 MW demonstration project Coastal Virginia Wind where we were contracted for EPC by Dominion Energy. The two-wind turbine off- shore wind farm was the first to be federally permitted for installation in US waters. In the north-eastern US, Ørsted and our part- ners Eversource and the State of Connecticut reached a final agreement on a harbour de- velopment plan for State Pier in New London that will transform the pier into a world-class offshore wind centre. In December, we signed an agreement with PSEG which acquired 25 % of the offshore wind farm Ocean Wind 1. Our offshore wind development pipeline in the US is progressing, but we are still waiting for the US Bureau of Ocean Energy Man- agement (BOEM) to decide on key aspects related to the permitting process. As a result, the construction start dates for Revolution Wind, Ocean Wind 1, Skipjack Wind, and Sunrise Wind will likely be delayed beyond the expected 2023 or 2024. We have sched- ule flexibility in all four projects and have been able to make good progress on other project milestones in the meantime. However, until there is a clear timeline from BOEM, we cannot modify the projects’ construction schedules. For our project South Fork Wind, we do not expect changes to the timeline or COD, currently scheduled for late 2023. Despite these permitting delays, we remain confident that we can deliver our US project portfolio with satisfactory returns. This is reinforced by the commitment of the incoming Joe Biden Administration to rapid clean energy deployment as well as the US Treasury’s recent announcement of a ten-year continuity safe harbour for offshore wind in addition to a new five-year, 30 % investment tax credit. Asia Pacific Our construction activities at the offshore wind farm Greater Changhua 1 & 2a are moving forward as planned. Currently, we are preparing for the installation of foundations which will commence in the first quarter of 2021, and we expect commissioning in 2022. In December 2020, we entered into an agree- ment to divest 50 % of Greater Changhua 1 to Canadian pension fund Caisse de Dépôt et Placement du Québec (CDPQ) and Taiwanese private equity fund Cathay PE. The agreement marks a milestone in successfully applying our partnership farm-down model in Asia Pacific. In July, we signed a CPPA with Taiwan-based TSMC, the world’s largest semiconductor foundry. TSMC will offtake the full production of our 920 MW offshore wind farm Greater Changhua 2b & 4, making it the largest-ever renewable energy CPPA. The 20-year fixed- price contract period will go into effect once Greater Changhua 2b & 4 reaches commercial operation, expected in 2025 or 2026, subject to grid availability and FID by Ørsted. Furthermore, we signed a 20-year lease with the Port of Taichung and a long-term vessel contract with Ta San Shang Marine Co. Ltd for our offshore wind farms off the coast of Changhua County, enabling construction of the first Taiwan-flagged service operation vessel (SOV). The SOV will use the Port of Taichung as its base where Ørsted’s O&M facilities will also be located. We also achieved significant progress in Japan in 2020. We entered into an agreement with TEPCO to establish a joint venture company for offshore wind in Japan, with the intention of working towards a joint bid in the first Japanese auction, expectedly in the first half of 2021. In 2020, we achieved an important milestone by deploying four floating LiDARs and secur- ing site exclusivity off the coast of Incheon in South Korea. We have begun to collect data for the site, an area with a potential capacity of 1.6 GW of offshore wind. Renewable hydrogen We have made significant progress on our renewable hydrogen pipeline over the past 18 months. In 2020 alone, we secured funding for two of the projects and launched three new projects together with different consortia. Ørsted’s renewable hydrogen pipeline now includes eight projects in Denmark, Germany, the UK, and the Netherlands, of which half have received funding. In January 2021, Ørsted took FID on the demonstration project H2RES which will produce renewable hydrogen for road transport from power generated by Ørsted’s two 3.6 MW offshore wind turbines at Avedøre Holme, Denmark. H2RES will have an electrolyser capacity of 2 MW and is expected to begin pro- duction in late 2021, which will make it our first renewable hydrogen project to reach operation. Also in January, the OYSTER project consortium, of which Ørsted is a member, was awarded five million euros from the European Commission’s private-public partnership Fuel Cells and Hydro- gen 2 Joint Undertaking (FCH2-JU) to develop a combined wind turbine and electrolyser system to produce renewable hydrogen offshore. The project is planned to run from 2021 to 2024, and we will lead the offshore deployment analysis and feasibility study and contribute to the design of the electrolyser system. In August 2020, we secured funding for another two projects. Phase two of the Gigastack project received funds from the UK govern- ment, enabling Ørsted and our partners to conduct a front-end engineering design (FEED) study for a 100 MW electrolysis plant which will use electricity from the Hornsea 2 Offshore Wind Farm. The Westküste 100 project was 52 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents “We have made significant progress on our renewable hydrogen pipeline over the past 18 months. also granted funding by the German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy as the first large-scale renewable hydrogen project within the Reallabor (real-world laboratory) framework. Westküste 100 is being developed by a cross-industry consortium of ten compa- nies, including Ørsted, and seeks to decarbonise industrial processes, aviation, construction, and heating through renewable hydrogen. The first phase includes the construction of a 30 MW electrolysis plant and the development of a plan to scale the facility to 700 MW. Last year also saw the launch of three new renewable hydrogen projects. In May, Ørsted and a group of leading Danish companies partnered up to develop an industrial-scale facility in the Greater Copenhagen area to produce e-fuels for road, maritime, and air transport. The partnership, Green Fuels for Denmark, brings together the demand and supply side of sustainable fuels under a vision of building one of the world’s largest electrolyser and e-fuels production facilities. Ørsted is part of the Europa Seaways consortium led by DFDS, one of our partners in Green Fuels for Denmark, which aims to develop the world’s first 100 % hydrogen- powered ferry for DFDS’ Oslo-Copenhagen route. In November, we applied for support from the EU Innovation Fund to further progress this project. Lingen Refinery in Emsland, Germany. The project includes a 50 MW electrolysis system with the aim of replacing fossil-based hydrogen at the Lingen Refinery. This is the first step towards the project’s long-term ambition of building more than 500 MW of electrolyser capacity which could meet the refinery’s entire hydrogen demand and provide feedstock for future e-fuel production. In October, we launched a renewable hydro- gen project in the Netherlands together with Yara, the world’s leading fertilizer company. The project will include a 100 MW electrolysis plant, producing renewable hydrogen from electricity from Ørsted’s offshore wind farms. The renewable hydrogen will replace fossil- based hydrogen in the production of ammonia at Yara’s facility in Sluiskil, with the potential of displacing more than 100,000 tonnes of carbon emissions per year. Finally, Ørsted and bp agreed in November to develop a renewable hydrogen project at bp’s 53 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents Onshore Highlights 2020 Operations We commissioned the 338 MW onshore wind farm Sage Draw in Texas and expanded our operational footprint in the SPP with the onshore wind farms Plum Creek (230 MW) and Willow Creek (103 MW), with all three projects completed on time and within budget. Business development We received tax equity financing for our onshore wind farms Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek. We signed 745 MW of long-term CPPAs with five different customers across four projects in both wind and solar. We took FID on the 367 MW onshore wind project Western Trail and on the 430 MWac Old 300 Solar Center. We acquired and took FID on the 227 MWac solar farm Muscle Shoals and on the 298 MW onshore wind farm Haystack. Willow Creek, Butte County, South Dakota, the US. Introduction to Onshore We develop, operate, and own onshore wind, solar PV, and storage projects across the southern and midwestern US, primarily in ERCOT, SPP, and the South-East. We own and operate seven onshore wind farms with a capacity of 1.7 GW. Furthermore, we have 0.7 GW of onshore wind, 1.1 GWac of solar PV, and 40 MWac of storage under construction. Our established execution model allows us to manage key interfaces together with top-tier suppliers and contractors to deliver flexible energy solutions in response to the dynamic needs of the diverse North American customer base. 54 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents Financial performance 2020 Power generation amounted to 5.7 TWh in 2020, which was a 64 % increase relative to 2019. The increase was due to new wind farms in operation (Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek) and a full year of generation from Lockett. Wind speeds amounted to a portfolio average of 7.6 m/s, up from 7.3 m/s in 2019 and slightly above a normal wind year (7.5 m/s). Revenue amounted to DKK 0.7 billion, up 9 % from 2019 due to higher generation, partly offset by lower prices for the part of the port- folio not covered by PPAs and a lower positive effect from derivate run-offs related to the acquisition of LCE back in 2018. EBITDA increased by 44 % and amounted to DKK 1.1 billion, driven by higher generation and related PTCs. Cash flows from operating activities amounted to DKK 3.9 billion, which primarily comprised tax equity contributions from our partners at Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek. In 2019, it primarily comprised a tax equity contribution related to the onshore wind farm Lockett. Gross investments amounted to DKK 6.6 billion in 2020 and was related to the construction of Permian Energy Center, Muscle Shoals, Western Trail, Sage Draw, Plum Creek, Willow Creek, and Haystack. Divestments comprised the sale of Oak Solar Farm in June 2020. In 2019, it primarily com- prised a sale and lease-back arrangement for land related to Permian Energy Center. Strategic and operational performance 2020 Our Onshore business made significant progress in 2020, taking FID on four projects and commissioning three projects on schedule and within budget, despite adverse COVID-19 impacts across the industry. Operations remained stable throughout the year with high asset availability across our portfolio. A strong pipeline of onshore wind and solar PV projects is being developed and will be matured further in 2021, putting us well on track to achieve our strategic ambition of 5 GW of installed onshore wind and solar PV capacity by 2025. Onshore wind In April, we commissioned the 338 MW onshore wind farm Sage Draw, our fifth in Texas. With the completion of the 230 MW Plum Creek in Nebraska in June and the 103 MW Willow Creek in South Dakota in September, we expanded our footprint in the Southwest Power Pool (SPP), a market which plays an important part of our growth in North America. The commissioning of these wind farms brought our operating portfolio to a total of 1.7 GW. We have received tax equity financing for all three projects which are eligible for the full value of the Renewable Electricity Production Tax Credit (PTC). In addition, we supplemented our development activities with the acquisition of Haystack, a 298 MW onshore wind project in Nebraska. The project is adjacent to Plum Creek and will use the same interconnection infrastructure. Haystack is expected to be commissioned in 2021 and is thus expected to be eligible for the full value of the PTC. EBITDA increased by 44 %. Performance highlights Business drivers Decided (FID) and installed capacity, onshore wind and solar Installed capacity, onshore wind and solar Wind speed Load factor, onshore wind Availability, onshore wind Power generation US dollars Financial performance Revenue EBITDA Sites Production tax credits and tax attributes Other, including project development Depreciation Impairment losses EBIT Cash flows from operating activities Gross investments Divestments Free cash flow Capital employed GW GW m/s % % TWh DKK/USD DKKm DKKm DKKm DKKm DKKm DKKm DKKm DKKm DKKm DKKm 2020 2019 % 3.4 1.7 7.6 45 96 5.7 6.5 733 1,131 451 2.1 63 % 1.0 7.3 45 98 3.5 6.7 670 786 466 67 % 4 % 0 %p (2 %p) 64 % (2 %) 9 % 44 % (3 %) 1,004 628 60 % (324) (482) - 649 (308) (351) (68) 367 5 % 37 % n.a. 77 % 3,921 1,007 289 % (6,633) (6,158) 114 255 (2,598) (4,896) 12,921 11,734 8 % (55 %) (47 %) 10 % Quarterly and annual wind speeds for our onshore wind farms m/s 2018 Normal wind year 2019 2020 7.8 7.5 7.7 8.0 6.6 6.7 8.0 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.6 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY 55 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents “Our Onshore business made significant progress in 2020. Non-RTO West California ISO Willow Creek Midcontinent ISO (MISO) Haystack Plum Creek Southern Power Pool (SPP) ISO New England New York ISO PJM Interconnection We also strengthened our asset base in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) by taking FID on Western Trail, our largest onshore wind project to date. Located near our onshore wind farm Lockett, the 367 MW project is expected to reach commercial operation in 2021. In line with our strategy, we have transferred the asset management of Willow Springs, Amazon, and Tahoka to Ørsted’s asset man- agement team. Since Lockett was completed, asset management has been performed inhouse for all new onshore wind projects and will be going forward. This improves our ability to optimise operational performance across the portfolio. our 227 MWac solar PV project in Alabama. Muscle Shoals is fully contracted under a long- term power purchase agreement with the Tennessee Value Authority (TVA), and we have secured tax equity financing for the project. The solar farm is expected to be operational in 2021 and will thus be eligible for the full value of the Business Energy Investment Tax Credit (ITC). Muscle Shoals is our first project in the South East where we have a strong pipeline of projects under development. In November, we took FID on the Old 300 Solar Center located near Houston, Texas. The 430 MWac project is expected to be commissioned in 2022 and will thus be eligible for the full value of the ITC. Solar PV 2020 also saw the continued expansion of our solar PV portfolio with the acquisition of and final investment decision on Muscle Shoals, As our strategic focus being large-scale solar farms, we divested the 10 MWac solar farm Oak Solar in June. Sage Draw Lockett Tahoka Permian Energy Center Western Trail Willow Springs Amazon Muscle Shoals Non-RTO South-East Old 300 Solar Center Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) US competitive wholesale electricity markets Power sector governance in the US is complex and fragmented. Approximately two thirds of the nation’s electricity load are served by seven competitive wholesale markets managed by regional transmission organisations (RTOs). ERCOT and SPP are two of these seven markets. The remaining load is served by traditional wholesale electricity markets where vertically integrated utilities act as regulated monopolies and are responsible for all activities related to the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity. The South-East is a region with this market structure. 56 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents Markets & Bioenergy Highlights 2020 Introduction to Markets & Bioenergy Operations Our US trading office began commercial opera- tions, supporting our US renewables portfolio. We achieved our target of sourcing 100 % third-party certified sustainable biomass for our biomass-fuelled CHP plants. We increased our provision of ancillary servic- es vital to the stable operation of the Danish grid and, in a first for Denmark, began offering some of these services as green products. We inaugurated the sustainable biomass-fired unit 6 of our Asnæs Power Station in August. We began commercial operations at our Renescience plant in Northwich, UK, marking a major milestone for our development of this technology. We contributed to Denmark’s public health response to the COVID-19 outbreak by helping restart and operate our former bioethanol plant in Kalundborg for the emergency production of ethanol for disinfectants. Asnæs Power Station, Kalundborg, Denmark. We serve as an efficient route-to- market for both Ørsted and third parties, by providing balancing services for renewable generation portfolios and by selling green certificates to the market. In doing so, we manage large volumes of power contracts that we optimise by leveraging the size of our combined portfolio and our origination and trading capabilities. We spearhead market risk manage- ment for our generation assets and contracts by trading power, green certificates, and other commodities. We provide around one quarter of Denmark’s district heating and around one third of Denmark’s thermal power through our CHP plants, making our CHP business a leading provider of heat, power, and ancillary services in Denmark. We ensure efficient operations and maximise the commercial value of our legacy gas portfolio. We manage Renescience, our patented waste-to-energy technology. 57 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents Business development We won significant new third-party power balancing contracts with renewable assets in the UK and the Netherlands. We entered into an agreement to resell some of the natural gas Ørsted receives under our legacy gas purchasing contracts to PGNiG Supply and Trading (PST). We completed the divestment of our power distribution, residential, and city light businesses, our LNG activities, and our Danish energy efficiency consulting business. We entered into an agreement to divest our UK B2B gas and power portfolios to Total Gas & Power. Financial performance 2020 Revenue decreased by 35 % compared to 2019 and amounted to DKK 21.4 billion. The decrease was mainly driven by a significant drop in average gas and power prices relative to last year as well as lower gas and power volumes sold. Thermal power generation amounted to 4.4 TWh, a 4 % decrease compared to last year due to slightly warmer weather and less favour- able market conditions for power generation, partly offset by a higher volume from ancillary services. Heat generation amounted to 6.7 TWh, down 20 % compared to last year, mainly due to a warm first quarter in 2020. EBITDA amounted to DKK 2.1 billion compared to DKK 1.5 billion in 2019. EBITDA from CHP plants totalled DKK 1.1 billion in 2020, a slight decrease compared to last year. The decrease was mainly due to lower thermal heat and power generation and lower power spreads as well as the reversal of a pro- vision in 2019 of DKK 0.3 billion following the acquittal in the Elsam case. This was partly offset by higher earnings from sale of ancillary services in 2020. EBITDA from Gas Markets & Infrastructure amounted to DKK 0.4 billion, in line with last year. Higher earnings from revaluation of our gas at storage and a positive impact from stor- age hedges was offset by lower transported and sold volumes due to the shutdown of the Tyra gas field from late 2019 until 2023 as well as a provision for bad debt in our B2B business to cover the extraordinary COVID-19-related default risks among our customers. EBITDA from LNG amounted to DKK 0 billion compared to a loss of DKK 1.0 billion in 2019. Due to the agreement to divest our LNG activ- ities in 2019, we made provisions to offset the negative earnings until the divestment in 2020. EBITDA from our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses amounted to DKK 0.9 billion in 2020 versus DKK 1.3 billion in 2019. As a result of the divest- ment in August, earnings in 2020 only included eight months of operations. We had no impairment losses in 2020, whereas impairment losses amounted to DKK 0.5 billion in 2019 and were related to a write-down of our Renescience plant in the UK, mainly due to delayed commissioning, increased CAPEX, and changed cost and price estimates. Performance highlights 2020 2019 % EBITDA increased by 43 %. Business drivers Degree days Heat generation Power generation Gas sales Power sales Gas price, TTF Power price, DK Power price, LEBA UK number 2,432 2,399 1 % TWh TWh TWh TWh EUR/MWh EUR/MWh GBP/MWh 6.7 4.4 90.3 11.6 9.3 26.7 36.8 8.3 4.6 (20 %) (4 %) 125.0 (28 %) 14.7 13.5 39.2 43.6 (2.6) 2.0 (21 %) (31 %) (32 %) (16 %) 341 % n.a. Green dark spread, DK EUR/MWh (11.2) Green spark spread, DK EUR/MWh (1.4) Financial results Revenue EBITDA CHP plants Gas Markets & Infrastructure LNG DKKm 21,420 32,816 (35 %) DKKm 2,136 1,495 1,111 1,152 411 - 390 (957) 43 % (4 %) 5 % n.a. Distribution, B2C, and city light 926 1,280 (28 %) Other, incl. project development Depreciation Impairment losses EBIT Cash flows from operating activities DKKm DKKm (312) (796) - (370) (798) (500) (16 %) 0 % n.a. DKKm 1,340 197 580 % DKKm 2,855 1,218 134 % Gross investments DKKm (715) (1,898) (62 %) Divestments Free cash flow DKKm 19,060 25 DKKm 21,200 (655) n.a. n.a. Capital employed DKKm 5,229 15,789 (67 %) 58 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents Cash flow from operating activities amounted to DKK 2.9 billion in 2020. The increase of DKK 1.6 billion was mainly due to lower paid taxes (receipt of on account taxes in 2020 versus payment of taxes on account in 2019), lower trade receivables due to lower revenue, an early repayment related to our oil pipe facilities, and changes in the value of deriva- tives. This was partly offset by a change in the value of gas at storage. Gross investments amounted to DKK 0.7 billion in 2020 and were mainly related to main- tenance of the power distribution grid and concluding works related to the bioconversion of Asnæs Power Station up until inauguration in August. Cash flow from divestments amounted to DKK 19.1 billion in 2020, of which the above-mentioned divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses contributed with We run our business on an end-to-end val- ue chain thinking. All activities and earn- ings that relate to Offshore and Onshore are reported in these segments, even if the daily activities are performed on be- half of the group in Markets & Bioenergy. Therefore, earnings from trading related to hedging of our power exposures and power portfolio optimisation activities in relation to Offshore and Onshore are presented in these business units. In 2020, EBITDA of DKK 236 million and DKK 48 million were transferred to Offshore and Onshore, respectively (DKK 725 million and DKK -18 million, respectively, in 2019). proceeds of DKK 20.5 billion. This was partly offset by a cash outflow in connection with the divestment of the LNG activities of DKK 1.5 billion. Strategic and operational performance 2020 In 2020, we made great strides in the devel- opment of our core activities, while continuing to streamline Markets & Bioenergy through divestments. Provide and develop a competitive route-to-market Having consistently reduced balancing costs over the last few years, we provide an increasingly efficient route-to-market for Ørsted’s generation portfolio. In 2020, with the addition of our asset Borssele 1, we grew the portfolio of Ørsted projects under our management to 5.6 GW. Our balancing services are also an increasingly competitive option for third-party renewable operators. We currently provide balancing services for nearly 600 MW of third-party ca- pacity, and in 2020, we won a major contract with the Dogger Bank Wind Farm, which is currently under construction. We will provide balancing for 40 % of the volume from phases A and B of this project, amounting to 960 MW when fully completed. We also made successful balancing-service bids for onshore third-party renewable projects in the Netherlands and Denmark. Spearhead market risk management Our market trading activities had another strong year in 2020, stemming from the successful hedging and trading of our energy exposures. We have especially benefitted from the flexibility embedded in the contract structures of our north-western European energy portfolio which we leverage to protect and extract value for Ørsted. As part of our digital strategy for short-term trading, we rolled out a smart bidding tool which uses a parametric algorithm to auto- matically trade volumes in small increments and improve the speed of our trade execution. The tool enhances our ability to capture stronger market prices in the UK, Germany, and the Netherlands. Our Chicago-based US trading organisation began commercial operations in early 2020, managing market risk for our US portfolio. The organisation contributes to our ongoing capacity build-out in the US by providing the same risk management and route-to-market services as for our European portfolio. Optimise and decarbonise our CHP plants 2020 was a milestone year for our biomass conversion programme. The Crown Prince of Denmark inaugurated the sustainable bio- mass-fired unit 6 of our Asnæs Power Station in August, marking the completion of our con- version programme and another step towards the full decarbonisation of our CHP operations in Denmark. Furthermore, we reached our target of sourcing 100 % of our biomass from third-party certified sustainable suppliers. In 2020, Denmark passed new biomass sustain- ability legislation that is in line with the strict standards we already require from our biomass suppliers on replanting of trees, protection of forest biodiversity, and supply chain emissions. In addition, we are exploring the potential of carbon capture technology at our bio- mass-fired CHP plants. Carbon captured from biomass combustion is biogenic and can contribute to negative emissions when stored permanently, or it can be used as a feedstock to produce carbon-neutral products. This year saw a temporary increase in our use of coal as a proportion of our overall fuel inputs, stemming from statutory requirements as part of our provision of ancillary services to the Danish power system. Our commitment to phase out coal by 2023 remains unchanged. By combining our dispatchable CHP capacity with our offshore wind portfolio in Denmark, we were for the first time able to offer some of our ancillary services as green products. Our offshore wind farm Horns Rev 2 was the first intermittent renewable source to qualify for providing automatic frequency restoration reserve (aFRR) services in Denmark. Optimise our gas portfolio With the Danish Undergrund Consortium- owned Tyra gas field in the North Sea shut down for redevelopment until June 2023, we have ensured continuous supply for our Danish and Swedish gas customers by importing piped volumes from Germany. When Tyra reopens, and as domestic biogas production increases, the dependence on imported gas to Denmark will decrease. 59 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Business units Contents In October 2020, we entered into a contract with the Polish natural gas company PST to sell approx. 70 TWh of natural gas over the period from 2023 to 2028. Under the agree- ment, Ørsted will resell some of the natural gas received from the Danish North Sea as part of our legacy gas purchasing contracts. The agreement reduces our exposure to long-term financial risk in our gas portfolio and supports Poland’s decarbonisation agenda. Poland aims to reduce the share of coal in its energy mix from 75 % today to 11-28 % by 2040 by substituting it with renewables and natural gas. Deliver on divestments In 2020, we continued streamlining Markets & Bioenergy to focus on our growth platform. At the end of July, we divested our energy efficiency consulting business to EBAS. In August, we completed the divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential custom- er, and city light businesses to SEAS-NVE (now Andel), and in December, we completed the divestment of our LNG business to Glencore. Finally, we signed an agreement with Total Gas & Power in September to divest our UK B2B gas and power portfolios. This transaction is expected to close in Q1 2021. We developed and launched a first-of-its-kind trading contract for renewable hydrogen certificates in the UK. Specifically targeting the decarbonisation of the transport sector, this contract builds on our other partnerships on renewable hydrogen technology. Commercialise Renescience In October, we successfully completed the final performance tests and began commercial op- erations at our Renescience plant in Northwich, the UK. The technology has the potential to significantly increase recycling rates of unsort- ed household waste and reduce the volumes of waste sent to landfills or incineration. The commissioning of our Northwich plant marks a major milestone, and we continue to explore the broader commercial potential of this technology. Asnæs Power Station, unit 6, Kalundborg, Denmark. 60 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Contents Governance 62 Message from the Chairman 63 Corporate governance 65 Board of Directors 69 The Executive Committee 70 Risk and risk management 74 Shareholder information Taiwan has set ambitious targets for renewable energy. It is an important market for Ørsted. We reached a significant milestone in the country in 2020 when we signed the world’s largest-ever renewable energy corporate power purchase agreement. The agreement, which will provide TSMC, a Taiwanese semiconductor manufacturing company, with green power for 20 years, underlines our pioneering role in the development of renewable energy in the Asia- Pacific region. Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents Message from the Chairman In the Board of Directors, we firmly believe that good corporate governance and high standards of integrity are fundamental as we continue to develop Ørsted as one of the global leaders in renewable energy. We have designed our corporate governance model to support transparency and com- pliance with regulation and best practice and to support business conduct and decision-making that is agile, efficient, and of high quality. Our corporate governance is supported by a company culture based on high ethical standards and clear values throughout the organisation. It is built on three pillars that are embedded throughout the organisation, from the Board to the individual employee. First, we have designed our management structure to enable the right decision-making power in the right places throughout the organisation. Therefore, we have defined clear roles, responsibilities, and key perfor- mance indicators at all levels of the organi- sation. In the Board, we oversee the overall strategic decision-making in Ørsted, while the Executive Board undertakes the day-to- day management of the company through the Executive Committee. Our Management Team of approx. 20 senior executives drives the strategic execution of our business plans and promotes a common culture across the company, supported by our wider manage- ment system of more than 1,000 managers across the company. Each employee across the company has clear targets for how to contribute, including personal development targets and success criteria that link back to our business strategy. Second, we want to ensure the right com- petences to successfully drive our business forward. We spend considerable amounts of time assessing and ensuring that we have the right competences at executive and board levels and attach importance to the members having extensive knowledge and experience covering a wide range of geographies and fields of expertise. Climate action is particu- larly fundamental to our business strategy of deploying renewable energy, so climate- related issues are an integral part of board and executive agendas. Therefore, a key set of competences for the Board includes envi- ronment, social, and governance (ESG) as this is fundamental for Ørsted’s business. For the Executive Board, we have also integrated ESG into their individual incentive schemes. To reinforce diversity, we have equal gender representation in the Board as defined by Danish law, and throughout the organisation, we continuously work to promote diversity through the representation of different nation- alities, genders, age distribution, and mindsets. Individual development is a key driver in helping to ensure that we have the right competences in place. That is why we have built a systematic approach to and culture of continuous development. Our approach warrants personal development, enables nu- anced, constructive feedback, and enhances growth opportunities for individuals at all levels of the organisation. We keep our governance principles under regular review, and we promote compliance internally and with our business partners through our code of conduct and due diligence, training, and reporting of miscon- duct to support the highest levels of good governance and integrity. On the following pages, you can read more about our corporate governance, and how we work with it. I look forward to continuing serving the Board in the coming year. Third, we want to maintain and further cul- tivate a company culture based on integrity. Integrity is our root and is the first of our five guiding principles. Our culture and focus on integrity are also supported by our policy on good business conduct and a set of internal controls aimed at protecting Ørsted’s integrity. We have clear policies, procedures, and guide- lines in place to prevent and address potential violations of our policy on good business con- duct. We have an Internal Audit function and a whistle-blower scheme where internal and external stakeholders can easily and anony- mously report concerns about inappropriate and illegal conduct in the company through an independent third party. Thomas Thune Andersen Chairman 62 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents Corporate governance Our overall and strategic management of the company is anchored in a board of independent non- executive directors appointed by the shareholders. The Board of Directors appoints the Executive Board, consisting of the CEO and CFO who undertake the day-to-day management of Ørsted through the Executive Committee. None of our executives are members of the Board of Directors. A Management Team con- sisting of the Executive Committee and senior vice presidents drives strategic development and cultural alignment across the company. Our governance model Shareholders and general meeting Board of Directors Nomination & Remuneration Committee Audit & Risk Committee Executive Committee Shareholders and general meeting Ørsted is a publicly listed company with the Danish State as majority shareholder with 50.1 % ownership. The Danish State exercises its ownership interest in Ørsted in accordance with the ordinary governance set-up in Danish companies where the Board of Directors and the Executive Board are responsible for the management of the company. The Danish State exercises its interest at the general meeting, including through the appointment of professional board members. The Danish State’s ownership policy is available here (only in Danish): fm.dk/udgivelser/2015/april/ statens-ejerskabspolitik/. All our shareholders may exercise their rights and vote at the general meeting through a one-share-one-vote principle. The general meeting adopts decisions, such as the election of the Board of Directors and the auditor, in accordance with the standard Danish rules. Due to our majority ownership by the Danish State, we have a bespoke quorum require- ment, as proposals to amend the Articles of Association or dissolve the company require that the Danish State participates in the general meeting and supports the proposals. Board of Directors Each year at the annual general meeting, the shareholders elect six to eight board members. In addition, our employees may elect members corresponding to half of the board members elected by the general meeting pursuant to Danish mandatory rules. Employee elections are held every four years. For the time being, our Board of Directors comprises nine members, six members elected by the general meeting and three members elected by the employees. The Board of Directors is responsible for the overall management of the company. The Board of Directors lays down the company’s strategy and makes decisions concerning ma- jor investments and divestments, the capital base, key policies, control and audit matters, risk management, and significant operational issues. You can see the most important tasks in 2020 on the next page. The Board monitors and oversees progress related to Ørsted’s climate change strategy, including our ambitious net-zero carbon reduc- tion targets for scope 1-3 emissions. We rou- tinely integrate climate change considerations when setting our strategic direction, reviewing sustainability risks, setting performance objectives, deciding on our capital allocation, and when approving and overseeing major investments, acquisitions, and divestments. The Board of Directors conducted its annual board evaluation in November 2020. The basis for the evaluation was a questionnaire that the individual members of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee had been asked to complete, and individual interviews conducted by an external advisor. At the evaluation, all members of the Board of Directors and the Executive Board expressed that the board is strong, aligned, well-functioning, and possesses the right competencies to govern the company. Moreover, all members found board discussions inclusive and open to the viewpoints of all members. As the company expands to new markets and technologies, there are some devel- opment areas that need to be further explored and evaluated, e.g. ensuring that the Board of Directors has the right competency coverage in the long-term and prioritizing succession as a more important part of the board agenda. The Board of Directors has prepared an overview of the competences required on the board. The list of required competences can be found at orsted.com/competences-overview. 63 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents Important tasks managed by the Board of Directors in 2020 Other tasks Appoint Mads Nipper as our new CEO following Henrik Poulsen’s resignation. Assess the claim made by the Danish Tax Agency, requiring Danish taxation of our British offshore wind farms Walney Extension and Hornsea 1 in the years 2015 and 2016. Issue green senior bonds in Taiwan to finance our green growth ambition towards 2025. Enter into multi-year agreement to resell some of the natural gas received from the Danish part of the North Sea to PGNiG Supply & Trading. Oversee the court case concerning the Ørsted name. Oversee the impacts of COVID-19. Oversee the results from the 2020 employee satisfaction survey, with a strong focus on the well-being of the employees, including discussions regarding inclusion, diversity, bullying, stress, and harassment. Oversee and discuss the development of our consolidated environmental, social, and governance (ESG) statements. Investments, acquisitions, and divestments Build out our offshore wind project portfolio after 2021, including bids into auctions and tenders in the Netherlands and US and entry into a corporate power purchase agreement with TSMC related to the Greater Changhua 2b & 4 offshore wind project in Taiwan and a virtual corporate power purchase agreement with Amazon related to the Borkum Riffground 3 offshore wind project in Germany. Enter into agreement to divest 50 % of the Changhua 1 project in Taiwan to a consor- tium of Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec and Cathay Private Equity. Enter into agreement to divest 25 % of the US offshore wind project Ocean Wind 1 to PSEG. Build out our onshore portfolio in the US, including final investment decisions on the onshore wind farm Western Trail and the solar farm Old 300 Solar Center and the acquisition of and final investment decisions on the onshore wind farm Haystack and the Muscle Shoals solar farm. Enter into agreement to divest the majority of our B2B portfolio of natural gas and power customers in the UK. Complete the agreements to divest our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses and our LNG business. Meeting attendance Member of the board Board of Directors Ordinary Extraordinary Thomas Thune Andersen Lene Skole Lynda Armstrong Jørgen Kildahl Peter Korsholm Dieter Wemmer Hanne Sten Andersen1 Poul Dreyer1 Benny Gøbel1 Ole Henriksen1 Daniel Tas Sandermann1 7/0 7/0 7/0 7/0 7/0 7/0 5/0 5/0 7/0 2/0 2/0 10/0 9/1 10/0 10/0 10/0 10/0 7/0 7/0 10/0 3/0 3/0 Audit & Risk Committee Nomination & Remuneration Committee 5/0 5/0 5/0 8/0 8/0 8/0 A description of the individual board mem- bers, including their other executive positions, independence, and how the individual board members contribute to the required compe- tences can be found on pages 65-67. Their meeting attendance during 2020 can be found in the table above. Each year, the general meeting approves the remuneration for the members of the Board of Directors for the coming year. In the separate remuneration report, you can read more about the remuneration of the Board of Directors. Furthermore, we have incorporated and follow all the recommendations prepared by the Danish Committee on Corporate Governance. See links to both reports to the right. The numbers indicate how many meetings in 2020 the members have attended or not attended, respectively, during the year. 1 Employee representative. During 2020, there have been changes in the employee representatives. As a result of this, meeting attendance varies. Ørsted Remuneration report 2020 Download Statutory corporate governance report Remuneration report 64 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents Board of Directors Thomas Thune Andersen * 1955, Denmark Chairman since 2014 Independent Joined in 2014 Re-elected in 2020 Term of office expires in 2021 Lene Skole * 1959, Denmark Deputy Chairman since 2015 Independent Joined in 2015 Re-elected in 2020 Term of office expires in 2021 Experience Positions Extensive international leadership experience from leading positions in A.P. Møller-Mærsk and non-executive directorships in listed and privately held companies within the energy, critical infrastructure, and other sectors. Chairman: VKR Holding A/S, Lloyds Register Group Limited, and Lloyds Register Foundation Member: BW Group ltd, IMI plc., Green Hydrogen Systems A/S, and the Danish Committee on Corporate Governance1 Highly experienced in managing listed companies from her previous position as CFO of Coloplast and current position as CEO of Lundbeckfonden where she serves as a non-executive director of the portfolio companies of Lundbeckfonden. CEO: Lundbeckfonden and Lundbeckfond Invest A/S Chairman: LFI Equity A/S Deputy Chairman: ALK-Abelló A/S, H. Lundbeck A/S and Falck A/S. Member: Tryg A/S, Tryg Forsikring A/S2 Competences Management √ General √ Safety Financial √ Risk √ Project √ Stakeholder Human resources Other √ Energy sector It, technology, and digitalisation Investor and capital market relationships √ ESG Management √ General Safety √ Financial √ Risk Project √ Stakeholder √ Human resources Other Energy sector It, technology, and digitalisation Investor and capital market relationships √ √ ESG Lynda Armstrong * 1950, Great Britain Independent Joined in 2015 Re-elected in 2020 Term of office expires in 2021 Strong global managerial experience from more than 30 years in leading positions in Shell, including as Vice President in Shell International, and from non-executive directorships in international companies and large organisations. Chairman: The Engineering Construction Industry Training Board (ECITB) Non-Executive Director: KAZ Minerals plc. 3 Management √ General √ Safety Financial √ Risk √ Project √ Stakeholder √ Human resources Other √ Energy sector It, technology, and digitalisation Investor and capital market relationships √ ESG 1 2 3 Board committees: Remuneration Committee of Lloyds Register Group Limited, Nomination Committee of Lloyds Register Foundation, Nomination Committee and Remuneration Committee of IMI plc, and Nomination Committee of VKR Holding A/S. Board committees: Audit & Risk Committee of Tryg A/S and Tryg Forsikring A/S, chairman of the Audit Committee and member of the Remuneration Committee of Falck A/S, Nomination & Remuneration Committee, Audit Committee and Scientific Committee of ALK-Abelló A/S, and Nomination & Remuneration Committee and Scientific Committee of H. Lundbeck A/S. Chairman of the Remuneration Committee, member of the HSE Committee, and member of the Project Assurance Committee of KAZ Minerals plc. 65 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents Experience Positions Jørgen Kildahl * 1963, Norway Independent Joined in 2018 Re-elected in 2020 Term of office expires in 2021 Strong international background in renewable energy and a profound knowledge of how the energy ecosystems work from positions as Executive Vice President of Statkraft and member of the board of management of E.ON. Deputy Chairman: Telenor ASA. Member: Höegh LNG Holding Ltd and Alpiq AG. Other: Senior Advisor for Energy Infrastructure Partners1 Competences Management √ General √ Safety Financial √ Risk √ Project √ Stakeholder Human resources Other √ Energy sector √ It, technology, and digitalisation Investor and capital market relationships √ √ ESG Peter Korsholm * 1971, Denmark Independent Joined in 2017 Re-elected in 2020 Term of office expires in 2021 Extensive M&A experience from his time as Partner and Head of EQT Partners Denmark and from private investments. Also experience with financial reporting, risk management, and capital markets from CFO position at AAK AB. CEO: DSVM Invest A/S, DSV Miljø Group A/S, Togu ApS, and Totalleveranser Sverige AB. Chairman: Nymølle Stenindustrier A/S, GDL Transport Holding AB, Lion Danmark I ApS, and Totalleveranser Sverige AB. Member: DSVM Invest A/S, A/S United Shipping and Trading Company, and DANX Holding I ApS2 Management √ General Safety √ Financial √ Risk Project √ Stakeholder Human resources Other Energy sector It, technology, and digitalisation Investor and capital market relationships √ √ ESG Dieter Wemmer * 1957, Switzerland Independent Joined in 2018 Re-elected in 2020 Term of office expires in 2021 Highly experienced in capital markets, invest- ments, and risk management from leading positions within the finance sector. Before focusing solely on non-executive director- ships, he was the CFO of Allianz. Chairman: Marco Holding, Plc. Member: UBS Group AG and UBS AG3 Management √ General Safety √ Financial √ Risk Project √ Stakeholder Human resources Other √ √ Energy sector It, technology, and digitalisation Investor and capital market relationships √ ESG 1 2 3 Member of the Audit & Risk Committee and the Sustainability & Compliance Committee of Telenor ASA, member of the Audit Committee of Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd, member of the Governance Committee and the Strategy Committee of Alpiq AG. Chairman of the Investment Committee of Zoscales Partners and Chairman of the Board of Directors of four wholly-owned subsidiaries of Lion Danmark I ApS (Lomax Group). He is also a member of the Board of Directors of three wholly-owned subsidiaries of A/S United Shipping and Trading Company, three wholly-owned subsidiaries of DANX Holding I ApS, and four wholly-owned subsidiaries of DSVM Invest A/S. Chairman of the Board of Directors of one wholly-owned subsidiary of Marco Holding Plc. Member of the Audit Committee, Governance and Nomina- tion Committee, and Compensation Committee of UBS Group AG and UBS AG. 66 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents Experience Positions Benny Gøbel * 1967, Denmark Benny Gøbel has worked in Ørsted since 2005. Engineer, Markets & Bioenergy. Employee representative Not independent Joined in 2011 Re-elected in 2018 Term of office expires in 2022 Ole Henriksen * 1972, Denmark Ole Henriksen has worked in Ørsted since 2007. Operations Engineer, Markets & Bioenergy. Employee representative. Not independent Joined in 2020 Term of office expires in 2022 Daniel Tas Sandermann * 1984, Denmark Daniel Tas Sandermann has worked in Ørsted since 2015. Head of Commercial & Strategy Execution, Markets & Bioenergy Employee representative Not independent Joined in 2020 Term of office expires in 2022 Competences Management General Safety Financial Risk Project Stakeholder Human resources Other √ Energy sector It, technology, and digitalisation Investor and capital market relationships ESG Management General Safety Financial Risk Project Stakeholder Human resources Other √ Energy sector It, technology, and digitalisation Investor and capital market relationships ESG Management √ General Safety Financial Risk √ Project √ Stakeholder Human resources Other √ Energy sector √ It, technology, and digitalisation Investor and capital market relationships √ ESG 67 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents Committees of the Board of Directors The Board of Directors has appointed two committees from among its members: an Audit & Risk Committee and a Nomination & Remuneration Committee which assist the Board of Directors within selected areas. Audit & Risk Committee Dieter Wemmer (Chairman), Jørgen Kildahl, and Peter Korsholm are the members of the Audit & Risk Committee. The committee assists the Board of Directors in overseeing the financial and ESG reporting process (including key accounting estimates and judgements), the liquidity and capital structure development, financial and business-related risks, compliance with statutory and other requirements from public authorities, internal controls as well as IT security in operational and administrative areas as well as cybersecurity. Moreover, the committee approves the frame- work governing the work of the company’s external and internal auditors (including limits for non-audit services), evaluates the external auditors’ independence and qualifications, and monitors the company’s whistle-blower scheme. In 2020, the committee approved an update of the internal control and WACC frameworks. The committee also reviewed the financial impact of COVID-19 and the divestments of our Danish power distribution, residential cus- tomer, and city light businesses, and our LNG activities. Furthermore, it assessed the claim made by the Danish Tax Agency requiring Danish taxation of our British offshore wind farms Walney Extension and Hornsea 1, and it reviewed the progress in IT security. Our Internal Audit function reports to the Audit & Risk Committee and is independent of our administrative management structures. Internal Audit enhances and protects the organisational value by providing risk-based and objective assurance, advice, and insight. The focus for Internal Audit is auditing and advising on our core processes, governance, risk management, control processes, and IT security. The Chairman of the Audit & Risk Committee is responsible for managing our whistle-blower scheme. Internal Audit receives and handles any reports submitted. Our employees and other associates may report serious offences, such as cases of bribery, fraud, and other inappropriate or illegal conduct, to our whistle- blower scheme or through our management system. In 2020, four substantiated cases of inappropriate or unlawful behaviour were reported through our whistle-blower scheme. Three cases concerned violation of good business conduct policies and one case concerned violation of administrative procedures. The four cases had consequences for the individuals involved. None of the reported cases were critical to our business and caused no adjustments to our financial results. Whistle-blower cases are taken very seriously, and we continuously enhance the awareness of good business conduct, e.g. through education as well as awareness campaigns, to minimise future similar cases. You can read more about the Audit & Risk Committee and the terms of refer- ence for the committee at orsted.com/ audit-risk-committee. Nomination & Remuneration Committee Thomas Thune Andersen (Chairman), Lene Skole, and Lynda Armstrong are the members of the Nomination & Remuneration Committee. Finally, the committee has been engaged in the recruitment of Mads Nipper as new CEO as of 1 January 2021, following Henrik Poulsen’s resignation in June 2020. The committee assists the Board of Directors in matters regarding the composition, remunera- tion, and performance of the Board of Directors and the Executive Committee. You can read more about the Nomination & Remuneration Committee and the terms of reference for the committee at orsted.com/ nomination-remuneration-committee. In 2020, the committee discussed, among other matters, our increasing global footprint and the impact on our pay mix. It was decided to introduce a higher level of variance within pay- mix on different markets to be more in line with local market terms. Following the implementation of the EU Shareholder Rights Directive II in Danish leg- islation, the committee reviewed the remu- neration policy for the Board of Directors and the Executive Board, and an updated version of the remuneration policy was subsequently approved by the annual general meeting in March 2020. The committee also spent time on the separate 2019 remuneration report covering the Board of Directors and the Executive Board as the company decided to reflect the new regulatory requirements, which apply from 2020, already in the 2019 reporting. Additionally, the committee has reviewed changes in the peer group used for benchmark- ing Ørsted’s relative TSR in the share-based long-term incentive programme. The changes were made to better match Ørsted’s current global footprint and business mix and to ad- dress the changes in the peer group’s business mix and footprint. 68 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents Executive Committee Mads Nipper CEO, Executive Board Marianne Wiinholt CFO, Executive Board Martin Neubert Offshore Declan Flanagan Onshore Morten Hultberg Buchgreitz Markets & Bioenergy Henriette Fenger Ellekrog CHRO Anders Lindberg Offshore EPC and QHSE The seven members of the Executive Committee undertake the day-to-day management. Mads Nipper (CEO) and Marianne Wiinholt (CFO) are members of the Executive Board of Ørsted A/S. The Board of Directors regularly discusses the CEO’s performance, for example by following up on developments seen in relation to our strategy and objectives. In addition to Mads Nipper and Marianne Wiinholt, the Executive Committee comprises the executive vice presidents (EVP) of our three business units: Martin Neubert (Off- shore), Declan Flanagan (Onshore), Morten H. Buchgreitz (Markets & Bioenergy) together with the EVPs Henriette Fenger Ellekrog (Chief Human Resources Officer - CHRO) and Anders Lindberg (Offshore EPC and QHSE). The Board of Directors has laid down guide- lines for the work of the Executive Board, including the division of work between the Board of Directors and the Executive Board and the Executive Board’s powers to enter into agreements on behalf of the company. The Chairman of the Board of Directors and the CEO also regularly discuss the coopera- tion between the Board of Directors and the Executive Board. We describe the remuneration of the Executive Board in the separate remuneration report, see link on page 64. You can also find information about the members of the Executive Board to the right. Mads Nipper *1966, Denmark Marianne Wiinholt *1965, Norway Registered as CEO. Group President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) since January 2021. Registered as CFO. Chief Financial Officer (CFO) since October 2013. Education & Career MSc in International Business, University of Aarhus 1991 2021 – Ørsted A/S, President and Chief Executive Officer 2014 – 20’ Grundfos A/S, Group President and Chief Executive Officer 1991 – 14’ Lego A/S, EVP, Chief Marketing Officer (2011-2014). EVP, Markets & Products (2006-2011), SVP, Global Innovation & Marketing (2004-2006), Managing Director and SVP, Lego Central Europe (2001-2004), SVP, Global Segment 8+ (1999-2001), and various manager positions (1992-1999). Other positions Axcel: Advisory board member. DI Dansk Industri: Board member. Danish Crown A/S: Deputy Chairman. Education & Career MSc in Business Administration & Auditing, Copenhagen Business School 1990, State- Authorised Public Accountant 1992. 2004 – Ørsted A/S, EVP, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) (2013-), SVP, CFO Customers & Markets (2013), SVP, Group Finance (2005-2013), and VP, Group Finance and Accounting & Tax (2004-2005). 1997 – 03’ Borealis A/S, Head of Group Finance & Auditing (2001-2003), Head of Group Accounting & Tax (1997-2001). 1987 – 97’ Arthur Andersen, Auditor. Other positions Coloplast AS: Member of the Board of Directors and Chairman of the Audit Com- mittee. Hempel A/S: Member of the Board of Directors and Chairman of the Audit Com- mittee (stepping down in 2021). Norsk Hydro ASA: Member of the Board of Directors and Chairman of the Audit Committee. 69 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents Risk and risk management Risks are a natural and integral part of our business activities, and risk diversification is an important part of Ørsted’s strategy. Our risk profile changes continuously. Our aim is to mitigate our risks and reduce them to an acceptable level through risk management. We are exposed to several risks in connection with our business activities. In addition to operational, business, and environmental risks, we are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates, inflation, exchange rates, and commodity prices as well as credit and insurance risks. The purpose of our risk management is to identify and quantify our risks and decide how best to manage and mitigate them. We assess the extent to which individual risks are acceptable or perhaps even desirable as well as the extent to which these risks can be reduced to ensure an optimum balance between risk and return. A large part of our earnings is generated from offshore wind, with Continental Europe and the UK being the key contributors. However, with our expansions into the US and Asia Pacific, our future earnings will be spread across more geographical regions and technologies. Therefore, political and other macroeconomic factors play an important role in our risk management. When we invest in new assets and activities or divest assets, the consolidat- ed risks associated with our portfolio changes. Therefore, we assess the impact of a given decision on the portfolio upfront. We work systematically with risks. All business units and selected staff functions identify and prioritise business risks. An assessment is made of the potential financial impact of individual risks, and whether they are of a short-term (0-2 years), medium-term (2-5 years), long-term (5+ years), or of recurring nature. All our risks are then consolidated and evaluated at Group level. The ultimate responsibility for all the individual risks rests with a member of the Executive Committee. As for business risks, similar processes are in place for identifying and prioritising risks related to sustainability and legal compliance. The top five business risks identified during 2020 are shown to the right where they are illustrated based on their potential impact (post-risk mitigation) on our value and credit metrics over the next years. You can read more about these risks on the following pages. Brexit is not in itself part of our top five busi- ness risks as we do not believe the UK leaving the EU will result in fundamental changes to the UK’s energy policy. Announcements by the UK government show that the UK is commit- ted to a clean, renewable energy future, and offshore wind is the backbone of this green vision. As we have entered 2021 with a signed Brexit agreement, the immediate short-term risk of a sharp GBP depreciation has vanished. However, given the uncertainty surrounding the remaining negotiations, GBP weakness cannot be ruled out over the coming years. Such a scenario could result in lower UK power prices than currently observed, but the government-introduced carbon price floor (CPF) will prevent a dramatic decline. These effects are embedded in our second-largest risk in our top five business risks, namely currencies and commodity prices. Top 5 business risks Effect on our value and credit metric High Quantification of risks is based on a scenario where the risk occurs with 10 % probability (P90). Our Internal Audit function has examined the process for identifying and measuring the accom- panying portfolio risks. e u l a v n o t c a p m I (#1 2019) Inflation and interest rates (part of #1 and #2 in 2019) Currencies and commodity prices (#5 in 2019) Increased competition leading to price pressure (#3 in 2019) US offshore development and construction Low High Impact on FFO/adjusted net debt (New in top 5) Cybersecurity 70 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents The risks related to sustainability and legal compliance are assessed using different pa- rameters. Hence, we do not show a consolidat- ed picture of our combined risks. both our transitional and physical climate- related risks in the short, medium, and long term. We do that by, among other things: We are also exposed to risks which have a very small probability of occurring, but which could potentially impact our finances and/or reputation substantially. These risks include, but are not limited to: – fatal injuries – 1,000-year storms, hurricanes, typhoons, or earthquakes, especially in Taiwan, which may lead to the loss of offshore and onshore wind farms – broken pipes at the Nybro Gas Treatment Plant in Denmark which may lead to per- sonal injury and damage to the environment – breakdowns at power plants that may lead to personal injury and loss of assets. After risk-reducing measures are implemented, the Executive Committee assess whether the level of each risk is appropriate, or if it is slightly or significantly higher than the desired level. If the risk level is still too high, further risk-reducing measures are initiated to the extent possible. Climate-related risks We address climate-related risks and opportu- nities as an integral part of our daily business, and we report as recommended by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). These risks and opportunities are directly linked to our green vision and strategy. We seek to exploit climate-related opportunities through our development and construction of renewable generation capacity and adjacent sustainable activities. At the same time, we seek to reduce – encouraging regulators and other public authorities to set ambitious targets for the build-out of renewable capacity and regula- tory frameworks which support this – continuously working to improve the future competitiveness of green technologies, i.e. lowering the levelised cost of electricity (LCoE) – assessing acute and chronic weather development; especially wind speeds and patterns, but also the temperature and precipitation levels in general – taking extreme weather conditions and other relevant factors into account when we design and construct our assets. In that way, we seek to avoid ending up with stranded assets or assets and activities with a significantly lower value than originally expected. When we prepare business cases for invest- ment in new assets or activities, we take climate-related risks and opportunities into account by assessing the expected changes in the green technology mix. On this basis, we as- sess the expected derived impact on input and output prices of energy, including the price development of components and services to be used for the construction of these assets as part of our LCoE analysis. A description of the most significant sustain- ability risks can be found in our sustainability report. In 2019, we concluded a climate scenario analysis, assessing the resilience of our offshore business in two potential scenarios of climate change: a 1.5-2 °C and 3-4 °C temperature rise by 2100, respectively. The study was conducted through research, interviews, and workshops and concluded that our offshore business is well positioned to manage climate-related risks of both transi- tional and physical nature. Please refer to our CDP climate change disclosure for detailed descriptions here. Development in risks in 2020 This year, cybersecurity risks have been ele- vated into our top five business risks, which means that construction risks have been excluded as a top risk for Ørsted. Additionally, we have seen relative changes between the risks compared to last year’s annual report. Inflation and interest rates are considered our number one risk. We have carved out currencies from inflation and interest rates and incorporated it into our second-largest risk alongside commodity prices. The change is motivated by the overlapping mitigation efforts in hedging currency and commodity price risks. As the offshore market continues to grow and mature, an increasing number of players have entered the market of renewable ener- gy generation. This has put pressure on prices in auctions and tenders in excess of what can be explained by the LCoE development. Therefore, the risk has been elevated to our third-largest risk. We continue to see increased development and construction risks in our US offshore projects compared to projects in more ma- ture markets. In 2020, the continued delays in the permitting process from the Bureau of Energy Management (BOEM), the US federal regulator, had an adverse impact on our portfolio. The risk is our fourth-largest. In this year’s annual report, cybersecurity risks have entered our top five business risks. Major cyberattacks are becoming more frequent, and we see an increasing number of cybercriminals looking to financially harm companies. As we grow into an ever-larger global renewable energy player, the threat of cyberattacks has increased. COVID-19 The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has affected lives, livelihoods, and economies around the world. At Ørsted, we activated our Corporate Crisis Management Organisation (CCMO) on 12 March 2020 to closely monitor develop- ments in the pandemic, enabling us to respond in a timely manner, thereby mini- mising health and safety risks and ensuring business continuity. Despite an agile pandemic response system, we have seen adverse impacts of the pan- demic, mainly related to our supply chain and the power prices in the markets where we operate. COVID-19-related lockdowns during spring and summer led to risks of delays at some of our offshore construction sites. Due to our experience and the flexibility in our time- lines, we have been able to progress on some other project milestones. Therefore, we assess the probability of COVID-19-related risks materialising and causing significant negative impact on Ørsted to be low. 71 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents 1 Inflation and interest rates 2 Currencies and commodity prices Description Our main currency exposure relates to GBP due to our substantial investments in offshore wind farms in the UK. However, our recent interna- tional expansion has increased our USD and NTD exposure. We are primarily exposed to power price risks from the sale of our wind-based power genera- tion in the US, the UK, and Denmark. In addition, we are exposed to risks caused by differences in local node prices and market hub prices in our Onshore business, which impact the realised revenue generation. To a lesser extent, we are exposed to oil and gas price risks related to sourcing contracts for gas to oil-indexed prices as well as the sale of gas at fixed prices. Finally, power generation from our CHP plants entails an exposure to power prices and fuel prices. As the green transformation in Ørsted advances, the main fuel at our CHP plants is biomass. The market for biomass has less liquidity than e.g. gas and coal, adding a risk to which we are exposed. Potential impact Fluctuations in exchange rates and commodity prices may adversely impact our earnings. Mitigating actions We hedge currencies and commodity prices for up to five years, and in some cases longer, to reduce cash flow fluctuations. We hedge more of the risk in the first years and less in the later years. This is due to decreasing market liquidity and increasing uncertainty about generated volumes. On the medium- to long-term horizon, the currency risk is managed by matching income and liabilities in the same currencies. For our USD and NTD exposures from new markets, we do not have an existing portfolio against which we can net construction payments. Therefore, we seek to hedge the price risk in the near term, while simultaneously hedging a similar, but opposite, exposure in the longer term. As an alternative to hedging power, we seek to enter into long-term corporate power purchase agreements (CPPAs), under which we sell power from our renewable assets. CPPAs or hedges with a duration of 10-15 years are often a pre- requisite for obtaining tax equity partnerships in the US. In addition, CPPAs will be a means to mitigate merchant risk for offshore wind farms to be built without subsidies. Our awarded off- shore wind farms situated off the US East Coast are guaranteed a fixed price for a period of approximately 20 years and thus, no additional merchant risk has been introduced. Description To a large extent, our medium- to long-term earnings can be expected to follow the development in consumer and market prices, thereby protecting the real value of our assets and equity. However, fixed nominal subsidies from wind assets in Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands and fixed-price power pur- chase agreements (PPAs) from assets in the US and Taiwan are exceptions to this, as are fixed nominal cash flows related to debt. We are ex- posed to inflation risks in these markets where an increase in inflation will adversely impact the expected real value of the revenue. Our farm-down model of funding future wind farms through divestments is exposed to interest rate risks as wind assets are more attractive to buyers when interest rates are low compared to other financial assets with similar risk profiles. Potential impact Fluctuations in interest rates and inflation may adversely impact our earnings and farm-down model, thereby affecting the value of our assets. Mitigating actions Our inflation and interest rate exposures are managed by matching assets and liabilities in the same currency and with similar payment structures. Hence, our European fixed nominal subsidies are offset by EUR-denominated fixed-rate debt. The risks that arise from Taiwan and US onshore and offshore projects can be reduced by obtaining matching-duration fixed- rate debt denominated in the same currency as the revenue. 3 Increased competition leading to price pressure Description As the offshore industry has become more mature and established, competition has increased with new market players entering. The industry is becoming more global, and diversification of developers is increasing. We expect a diversified competitive landscape going forward, including oil majors, utilities, institutional investors, and regional developers. In offshore wind, the competitive auction and tender mechanics being implemented across the various regions and markets are also becoming more diversified. While the mature European markets increasingly look to include innovation and system integration (e.g. storage and renewable hydrogen) to play an increas- ingly important role in auctions and tenders, developing markets in both Europe, the US, and Asia Pacific often emphasise costs and job creation as determination criteria. For offshore wind, this necessitates a flexible approach to remain competitive across the different markets and implies the need to retain strong supplier engagement and cost standardisation. Potential impact There is a risk that we will not win the targeted capacity in the auctions and tenders in which we participate, or that our value creation from the projects we win ends up being lower than targeted. Mitigating actions We will continue to utilise portfolio-scale ad- vantages and knowhow gained from previously executed projects to develop supply chain solutions and reduce costs and risks in order to maximise our ability to win future projects. Furthermore, early commitments and both global and regional framework agreements are being made to secure capacity. 72 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents 4 US offshore development and construction Description Our expanding pipeline of US offshore projects entails risks in the development and construction phases caused by the relatively immature US offshore wind market, including the federal permitting process, for which we are still awaiting clarification from BOEM. Contrary to the EU markets, it is possible in the US to participate in auctions and be awarded pro- jects where consent and/or grid connections are not yet secured. Thus, following an award, project development entails regulatory risks in obtaining key consents as well as securing grid connection(s). Furthermore, local content requirements and the immature US offshore wind market also lead to increased construction risks in the US, such as the availability of locally manufactured components and harbour facilities. Potential impact To maintain project schedules, permits, con- sents, and approvals from federal, state-level, and local authorities must be obtained in due time. Securing sufficient grid connection capacity on time is also key. Delays within these areas can lead to project delays and/or cost overruns which may reduce the value of the projects. Mitigating actions We mitigate the risks by having sufficient float in our project timelines and by proactively engaging with all stakeholders. Furthermore, we secure grid connection capacity through an approach of having multiple points of interconnections available to us in due time relative to wind turbine commissioning. We fulfil part of the local content obligations by investing in harbour infrastructure, thereby also securing critical harbour capacity for staging and load-out of wind turbines. 5 Cybersecurity Legal compliance Description In recent years, several major cyberattacks have been launched against companies around the world, and we see growth in serious cyber operations in closer proximity to our business presence. We assess cybersecurity risks by identifying: 1) protection level and possible residual exploitation scenarios for our systems and processes, 2) threat intelligence on main types of actors and characteristics for intention and capabilities, and 3) financial impact. Correspondingly, we have a strong focus on IT security. As we possess critical energy generation capacity and own various types of intellectual property rights, we are a potential target for cyberattacks or industrial espionage. Potential impact Minor digital risk events, such as viruses and attempted break-ins, are everyday risks without significant impact. However, major cyberattacks or events may impact all or part of our shared infrastructure for administrative systems or industrial control systems. For the latter, the impact could range from a single as- set to potentially all assets and activities in the company. Cyberattacks of a certain size can be costly if it forces us to shut down operations for a period of time. Mitigating initiatives Our mitigation effort towards cyberattacks is twofold. First, we continually improve our resil- ience against cyberattacks and other threats across Ørsted through our security programme. This is carried out through workshops across business units to assess the cyber risks. This is combined with an advanced security architec- ture, spanning the entire company. Second, we are participating in relevant forums across the energy sector to harvest ideas and contribute with information and experience. Description Risks associated with legal compliance are assessed based on financial and reputational significance and probability. Our most signif- icant risks are tax law, financial regulations, and tender law. We operate in tax regimes with different tax rules and rates, and our tax affairs span over corporate tax compliance, transfer pricing, and indirect taxes. We are subject to several financial regulations, such as REMIT, MAR, EMIR, Dodd Frank, MiFID, SFTR, and AML1. The financial regulations are relevant for a large part of our activities. Lastly, many of our purchases of goods, services, and work in the EU are subject to EU and local tender rules. Potential impact Failure to comply with the above-mentioned rules and regulations may result in severe legal sanctions, such as imprisonment, fines, and damage claims, but also in delays in sourcing processes and subsequent risk of delay of projects. Mitigating initiatives We are well under way with the implementa- tion of a comprehensive tax control framework and mandatory compliance, including transfer pricing documentation, in line with OECD recommendations and local requirements. This is being prepared on a contemporaneous basis to mitigate our tax risks. We have implemented comprehensive policies, procedures, training, and controls for relevant parts of our business to ensure compliance with financial regula- tions. To ensure compliance with tender laws, our legal team carries out training courses for procurement teams in basic tender law and practical courses on how to apply the standard tender documents and works closely together with Procurement on major tenders. 73 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents Shareholder information The Ørsted share yielded a total return of 82 % in 2020, an increase in the share price of 80 % and dividends of DKK 10.5 per share. Price development for the Ørsted share The Ørsted share closed 2019 at a price of DKK 689 and closed 2020 at DKK 1,244. Prices of comparable European utility companies de- creased by 5 %, and the OMX C25 cap increased by 34 % in 2020. The market value of Ørsted was DKK 523 billion at the end of the year. Since the IPO in June 2016, the Ørsted share has generated an aggregate return from share price appreciation and dividends of 444 %. The year’s highest traded price of DKK 1,273 was on 29 December. The year’s lowest traded price of DKK 574 was on 19 March. The average daily turnover on Nasdaq Copen- hagen was 516,919 shares. The trading volume increased by 16 % compared to 2019. In connection with SEAS-NVE’s (now Andel) acquisition of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses, Andel sold shares equivalent to 2.27 % of the shares in Ørsted in January 2020, bringing their shareholding to 5.01 %. Share price development in 2020 Ørsted share price compared to peers DKK 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Ørsted OMX C25 MSCI Europe Utilities Share capital Ørsted’s share capital is divided into 420 million shares, enjoying the same voting and dividend rights. The company’s share capital remained unchanged in 2020. At the end of 2020, the company held a total of 313 thousand treasury shares which will be used to cover incentive schemes. Selected company announcements in 2020 4 Mar. Ørsted increases its full-year EBITDA guidance 25 Mar. Ørsted provides COVID-19 update 3 Apr. Ørsted postpones Capital Markets Day 15 June Henrik Poulsen has resigned and steps down as CEO of Ørsted no later than 31 January 2021. The Board of Directors has initiated a process to identify Ørsted’s next CEO Composition of shareholders At the end of the year, the number of share- holders had increased by 67 % to 71,807, and the majority (63 %) lies with Danish owners. The figure on the next page shows the compo- sition of our shareholders by country, specify- ing the three shareholders each holding more than 5 % of the share capital. Approximately 2 % of the share capital is owned by retail investors. Annual general meeting and dividends The annual general meeting will be held on 1 March 2021. Dividends for the year are expected to amount to DKK 11.5 per share, corresponding to DKK 4.8 billion and a yield of 0.9 % compared to the share price of DKK 1,244 at the end of 2020. 8 July Ørsted and TSMC sign the world’s largest renewables corporate power purchase agreement 31 Aug. Ørsted completes the divestment of its Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses 9 Sep. Ørsted appoints Mads Nipper the next CEO of Ørsted 4 Nov. Ørsted successfully issues green bonds in Taiwan 1 Dec. Ørsted appeals against decision from the Danish Tax Agency on Danish taxation of two offshore wind farms in the UK 4 Dec. Ørsted divests 25 % of Ocean Wind 1 to PSEG 10 Dec. Ørsted and Amazon sign Europe’s largest offshore wind corporate power purchase agreement 28 Dec. Ørsted brings in CDPQ and Cathay PE as investors in the Greater Changhua 1 Offshore Wind Farm In 2020, dividends of DKK 10.5 per share were paid for the 2019 financial year, corresponding to a dividend yield of 1.5 %. Financial calendar 2021 3 Feb. Annual report 2020 1 Mar. Annual general meeting 29 Apr. Interim report for the first quarter of 2021 12 Aug. Interim report for the first half-year of 2021 3 Nov. Interim report for the first nine months of 2021 74 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Management’s review Governance Contents conference calls, roadshows, conferences, capital markets days, and regular meetings with individual or groups of investors and analysts. The dialogues are subject to certain restrictions prior to the publication of our financial reporting. The Group is covered by 30 equity analysts and 11 bond analysts. Their recommendations and consensus estimates for Ørsted’s future financial performance are available at orsted.com/en/investors. On this site, you can also download our financial reports, our remuneration report, our ESG performance report, and our sustainability report as well as investor presentations and a wide range of other data. Investor relations In order to achieve a fair pricing of our shares and corporate bonds, we seek to ensure a high level of openness and stability in our financial communication. In addition, our management and our Investor Relations function engage in regular dialogues with investors and analysts. The dialogues take the form of quarterly Shareholders at 31 December 2020, share capital and/or voting share %* Danish State (majority shareholder) Andel A.M.B.A, Denmark The Capital Group, United States Retail investors, Denmark North America United Kingdom Danish institutional investors Others 8-13 % 6 % 8 % 11 % 2 % 5-10 % 5 % * See note 16 in the parent company financial statements. Share information ISIN DK 0060094928220 Share classes 1 50.1 % Nominal value DKK 10 per share Average daily volume 516,919 Exchange Ticker Year high Year low Nasdaq OMX Copenhagen ORSTED DKK 1,273 (29 Dec.) DKK 574 (19 Mar.) Registered share 99.6 % Number of shares 420,381,080 shares Number of treasury shares 312,844 shares Formosa 1, off the coast of Miaoli County, Taiwan. 75 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Notes Contents Consolidated financial statements 2020 1 January – 31 December Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements Notes Contents Income statement 1 January - 31 December Note DKKm 2.2, 2.4 Revenue 2.3 Cost of sales Other external expenses 2.7, 2.8 Employee costs 2.6 2.6 3.1 Share of profit (loss) in associates and joint ventures Other operating income Other operating expenses Operating profit (loss) before depreciation, amortisation, and impairment losses (EBITDA) Amortisation, depreciation, impairment losses on intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment Operating profit (loss) (EBIT) 3.4 Gain (loss) on divestment of enterprises Share of profit (loss) in associates and joint ventures 6.5 6.5 Financial income Financial expenses Profit (loss) before tax 5.2 Tax on profit (loss) for the year Profit (loss) for the year from continuing operations 3.7 Profit (loss) for the year from discontinued operations Profit (loss) for the year Profit (loss) for the year is attributable to: 2020 2019 Business performance Adjustments 52,601 (26,708) (5,774) (4,283) 71 2,620 (403) (2,450) 924 - - - - - IFRS 50,151 (25,784) (5,774) (4,283) 71 2,620 (403) Business performance Adjustments 67,842 (41,816) (6,091) (3,952) (20) 1,781 (260) 2,556 (1,020) - - - - - IFRS 70,398 (42,836) (6,091) (3,952) (20) 1,781 (260) 18,124 (1,526) 16,598 17,484 1,536 19,020 (7,588) 10,536 10,831 7 5,779 (8,303) 18,850 (2,123) 16,727 (11) 16,716 - (1,526) - - - - (1,526) 347 (1,179) - (1,179) (7,588) 9,010 10,831 7 5,779 (8,303) 17,324 (1,776) 15,548 (11) 15,537 (7,432) 10,052 (63) 2 7,718 (8,853) 8,856 (2,756) 6,100 (56) 6,044 - 1,536 - - - - 1,536 (345) 1,191 - 1,191 (7,432) 11,588 (63) 2 7,718 (8,853) 10,392 (3,101) 7,291 (56) 7,235 Shareholders in Ørsted A/S 16,289 (1,179) 15,110 5,315 1,191 6,506 Interests and costs, hybrid capital owners of Ørsted A/S Non-controlling interests 6.2 Profit (loss) per share, DKK: From continuing operations From discontinued operations Total profit (loss) per share 488 (61) 38.8 0.0 38.8 488 (61) 36.0 0.0 36.0 675 54 12.8 (0.1) 12.7 675 54 15.6 (0.1) 15.5 Profit (loss) per share Diluted profit (loss) per share corresponds to profit (loss) per share, as the dilutive effect of the share incentive programme is less than 0.1 % of the share capital. Accounting policies Business performance The business performance principle is our alternative performance measure. Under business performance, the market value adjustment of our energy hedges where we do not apply IFRS hedge accounting are deferred and recognised in the profit (loss) in the year in which the hedged exposure materialises. Energy hedges comprise hedging of energy and associated currency risks as well as fixed-price physical gas and power contracts. According to IFRS, the market value of energy hedges where we do not apply IFRS hedge accounting are recognised on an ongoing basis in the profit (loss) for the year. The difference between IFRS and business performance is specified in the ‘Adjust- ments’ column. Read more about the business per- formance principle in note 1.6 ‘Business performance’. 77 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements Notes Contents Statement of comprehensive income 1 January - 31 December 2020 2019 Business performance Adjustments 16,716 (1,179) (1,249) (246) (5,104) 2,163 - 257 520 3 (3,656) 13,060 979 547 - - - (347) - - 1,179 - Note DKKm Profit (loss) for the year Other comprehensive income: Cash flow hedging: 1.6, 7.2 Value adjustments for the year 6.2 Value adjustments transferred to income statement Exchange rate adjustments: Exchange rate adjustments relating to net investment in foreign enterprises Value adjustment of net investment hedges Value adjustments and hedges transferred to income statement 7.2 6.2 Tax: Tax on hedging instruments Tax on exchange rate adjustments Other: Share of other comprehensive income from associated companies, after tax Other comprehensive income Total comprehensive income Comprehensive income for the year is attributable to: Shareholders in Ørsted A/S Interest payments and costs, hybrid capital owners of Ørsted A/S Non-controlling interests Total comprehensive income Business performance Adjustments 6,044 1,191 1,598 1,751 (141) (1,395) 2,722 (1,907) - (504) (35) (17) 3,608 9,652 - - - 345 - - (1,191) - IFRS 15,537 (270) 301 (5,104) 2,163 - (90) 520 3 (2,477) 13,060 12,744 488 (172) 13,060 Statement of comprehensive income All items in ‘Other comprehensive income’ may be recycled to the income statement. Cash flow hedging: Value adjustments for the year for cash flow hedging according to IFRS amounting to DKK -270 million mainly consist of losses related to hedging of power partly countered by gains related to hedging of UK inflation. The loss of DKK 301 million transferred to the income statement mainly consist of early termination of interests rate swaps related to the termination of the project financing of Block Island. Value adjustments transferred to the income statement according to the adjustment column amounting to DKK 547 million mainly consist of losses on gas hedges that are recognised in the income statement under business performance, but where the losses under IFRS were recognised in previous periods, as the gains and losses under business performance are deferred to the period to which the hedged exposure relates. Exchange rate adjustments: Foreign exchange losses relating to net investments in foreign enterprises amounting to DKK -5,104 million were in 2020 primarily attributable to an decrease of 6 % in the GBP exchange rate and a decrease of 9 % in the USD exchange rate. A large part of the net investments were hedged. IFRS 7,235 1,457 356 2,722 (1,907) - (159) (35) (17) 2,417 9,652 8,729 675 248 9,652 78 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements Notes Contents Balance sheet 31 December Note Assets, DKKm 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 5.3 4.4 4.1 7 4.2 4.3 4.4 6.4 6.4 3.6 Intangible assets Land and buildings Production assets Fixtures and fittings, tools, and equipment Property, plant, and equipment under construction Property, plant, and equipment Investments in associates and joint ventures Other securities and equity investments Deferred tax Other receivables Other non-current assets Non-current assets Inventories Derivatives Contract assets Trade receivables Other receivables Income tax Securities Cash Current assets Assets classified as held for sale Assets 196,719 192,860 Assets and related liabilities held for sale In August, we completed the divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses to SEAS-NVE (now Andel). In December, we completed the divestment of our LNG business to Glencore. At 31 December 2020, assets and related liabilities held for sale comprised our oil pipe system in Denmark. 2020 639 5,574 86,184 507 29,345 121,610 555 209 6,784 1,925 9,473 131,722 14,739 6,109 30 6,732 3,720 852 25,173 6,178 63,533 1,464 2019 Note Equity and liabilities, DKKm 672 5,177 76,682 652 23,502 106,013 497 217 6,847 1,713 9,274 115,959 14,031 7,740 739 8,140 5,253 346 16,552 7,148 59,949 16,952 6.2 6.2 6.3 3.8 5.3 3.2 8.2 6.1 4.2 4.5 4.6 3.2 8.2 6.1 7 4.2 4.5 4.6 Share capital Reserves Retained earnings Proposed dividends Equity attributable to shareholders in Ørsted A/S Hybrid capital Non-controlling interests Equity Deferred tax Provisions Lease liabilities Bond and bank debt Contract liabilities Tax equity liabilities Other payables Non-current liabilities Provisions Lease liabilities Bond and bank debt Derivatives Contract liabilities Trade payables Tax equity liabilities Other payables Income tax Current liabilities Liabilities 3.6 Liabilities relating to assets classified as held for sale 2020 4,204 (1,956) 74,294 4,834 81,376 13,232 2,721 97,329 2,187 12,475 4,455 34,374 3,650 6,780 374 2019 4,204 413 64,051 4,414 73,082 13,232 3,248 89,562 3,371 12,063 4,728 36,039 3,762 4,563 469 64,295 64,995 1,388 599 2,392 6,318 480 9,742 1,187 6,082 6,220 34,408 98,703 687 538 604 801 6,958 784 10,832 632 4,247 4,075 29,471 94,466 8,832 Equity and liabilities 196,719 192,860 79 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements Notes Contents Statement of changes in equity 1 January - 31 December DKKm Share capital Reserves* Retained earnings Proposed dividends Share- holders in Ørsted A/S Hybrid capital Non-con- trolling interests Total Group Share capital Reserves* Retained earnings Proposed dividends Share- holders in Ørsted A/S Hybrid capital Non-con- trolling interests Total Group Equity at 1 January 4,204 413 64,051 4,414 73,082 13,232 3,248 89,562 4,204 (1,827) 62,012 4,099 68,488 13,239 3,388 85,115 2020 2019 Comprehensive income for the year: Profit (loss) for the year Other comprehensive income: Cash flow hedging Exchange rate adjustments Tax on other comprehensive income Share of other comprehensive income of associated companies, after tax Total comprehensive income Coupon payments, hybrid capital Tax, hybrid capital Additions, hybrid capital Disposals, hybrid capital Proposed dividends Dividends paid Purchase of treasury shares Other changes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15,110 31 (2,830) 430 - - - - 3 (2,369) 15,113 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15,110 488 (61) 15,537 6,506 675 54 7,235 - - - - - - - - - - 31 (2,830) 430 3 12,744 - - - - - - - - - 488 (488) - - - - - - - - 31 (111) (2,941) - - 430 3 (172) 13,060 - - - - - (488) - - - - (361) (4,771) - 6 (58) 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6,506 1,813 621 (194) - - - - (17) 2,240 6,489 - - - - - - - - - - - - (4,414) 4,414 3 (4,099) (4,096) (99) 60 - - (99) 60 1,813 621 (194) (17) 8,729 - - - - - - - - - 675 (556) 34 4,416 (4,576) - - - - - 1,813 194 - - 815 (194) (17) 248 9,652 - - - - - (556) 34 4,416 (4,576) - (388) (4,484) - - (99) 60 (4,834) 4,834 4 (4,414) (4,410) (58) 18 - - (58) 18 Equity at 31 December 4,204 (1,956) 74,294 4,834 81,376 13,232 2,721 97,329 4,204 413 64,051 4,414 73,082 13,232 3,248 89,562 * See note 6.2 ‘Equity’ for more information about reserves. 80 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements Notes Contents Statement of cash flows 1 January - 31 December Note DKKm 2020 2019 Note DKKm Operating profit (loss) before depreciation, amortisation, and impairment losses (EBITDA), IFRS 1.6 Change in derivatives, business performance adjustments Change in derivatives, other adjustments Change in provisions Reversal of gain (loss) on divestment of assets 4.7 4.7 4.7 Other items Change in work in progress Change in tax equity partner liabilities Change in other working capital Interest received and similar items Interest paid and similar items 5.4 Income tax paid Cash flows from operating activities Purchase of intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment Sale of intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment 3.3 3.4 Acquisition of enterprises Divestment of enterprises Purchase of other equity investments Purchase of securities Sale/maturation of securities Change in other non-current assets Transactions with associates and joint ventures Dividends received and capital reductions Cash flows from investing activities Supplementary statements Our supplementary statements of gross and net investments appear from note 3.5 ‘Gross and net investments’ and free cash flows (FCF) from note 2.1 ‘Segment information’. 16,598 1,526 411 (772) (805) (42) (1,613) 2,958 1,153 3,032 (4,862) (1,118) 16,466 19,020 (1,536) (1,040) 727 101 86 1,417 630 (477) 4,094 (5,143) (4,800) 13,079 (26,957) (22,445) 123 - 18,914 (6) (19,862) 11,212 15 (19) 18 3,424 (764) (89) (5) (20,503) 29,452 - (88) 21 (16,562) (10,997) Proceeds from raising of loans Instalments on loans Instalments on leases Coupon payments on hybrid capital Repurchase of hybrid capital Proceeds from issuance of hybrid capital Dividends paid to shareholders in Ørsted A/S Purchase of own shares 3.8 Transactions with non-controlling interests Net proceeds from tax equity partners Change in collateral related to derivatives Cash flows from financing activities Cash flows from continuing operations Cash flows from discontinued operations Total net change in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January Total net change in cash and cash equivalents 3.7 6.4 Exchange rate adjustments of cash and cash equivalents 6.4 Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December 2020 3,406 (2,398) (541) (488) - - (4,410) (58) (428) 101 2,691 (2,125) (2,221) 966 (1,255) 6,459 (1,255) 6 5,210 2019 10,174 (2,043) (664) (556) (4,005) 4,416 (4,096) (99) (462) 1 (1,332) 1,334 3,416 174 3,590 2,663 3,590 206 6,459 Accounting policies ‘Cash flows from operating activities’ are determined using the indirect method as operating profit (loss) before depreciation, amortisation, and impairment losses adjusted for changes in operating items without cash flow effect. Trade payables relating to purchases of intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment are not recognised in change in net working capital. ‘Change in work in progress’ consists of elements in contract assets, contract liabilities, construction management agreements related to construction of offshore wind farms, construction of offshore trans- mission assets (inventory), and related trade payables. ‘Change in tax equity partner liabilities’ relates to cash contributions from tax equity partners and repayment hereof through production tax credits (PTCs) and other tax attributes to tax equity partners. See also note 4.5 ‘Tax equity liabilities’. ‘Cash flows from investing activities’ comprise payments in connection with the purchase and sale of non-current assets and enterprises as well as the purchase and sale of securities that are not recognised as cash and cash equivalents. ‘Cash flows from financing activities’ comprise changes in the size or composition of equity and loans, including instalments on leases and net proceeds related to interest-bearing tax equity liabilities. Proceeds from raising of short-term repo loans are presented net. Cash flows in currencies other than the functional currency are translated at the average exchange rates for the month in question, unless these differ significantly from the rates at the transaction date. 81 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements Notes Contents Notes Consolidated financial statements 1. Basis of reporting 83 5. Tax 1.1 Significant changes in the current reporting period 84 85 1.2 Basis of preparation 1.3 Key accounting estimates and judgements 87 1.4 Implementation of new or changed accounting 5.1 Approach to taxes 5.2 Tax on profit (loss) for the year 5.3 Deferred tax 5.4 Our tax footprint 6. Capital structure 6.1 Interest-bearing debt and FFO 6.2 Equity 6.3 Hybrid capital 6.4 Financial resources 6.5 Financial income and expenses 7. Risk management 7.1 Market risks 7.2 Hedge accounting and economic hedging 7.3 Energy trading portfolio 7.4 Sensitivity analysis of financial instruments 7.5 Credit risks 7.6 Categories of financial instruments 7.7 Fair value measurement 8. Other notes 8.1 Related-party transactions 8.2 Leases 8.3 Auditor’s fees 8.4 Contractual obligations 8.5 Company overview standards and interpretations 1.5 Alternative performance measures 1.6 Business performance 2. Return on capital employed 2.1 Segment information 2.2 Revenue 2.3 Cost of sales 2.4 Government grants 2.5 Research and develop ment expenditures 2.6 Other operating income and expenses 2.7 Employee costs 2.8 Share-based payment 3. Capital employed 3.1 Intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment 3.2 Provisions and contingent assets and liabilities 3.3 Acquisition of enterprises 3.4 Divestment of enterprises 3.5 Gross and net investments 3.6 Assets classified as held for sale 3.7 Discontinued operations 3.8 Non-controlling interests 4. Working capital 4.1 Inventories 4.2 Contract assets and liabilities 4.3 Trade receivables 4.4 Other receivables 4.5 Tax equity liabilities 4.6 Other payables 4.7 Changes in net working capital 88 89 90 93 95 98 101 102 102 103 104 105 107 109 112 114 115 115 116 116 117 118 120 120 121 121 122 123 123 124 126 128 130 132 135 137 139 141 142 144 145 147 149 152 153 154 155 156 158 159 160 161 161 162 82 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Notes Contents 1. Basis of reporting 84 Significant changes in the current reporting period 85 Basis of preparation 87 Key accounting estimates and judgements 88 Implementation of new or changed accounting standards and interpretations 89 Alternative performance measures 90 Business performance Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 1. Basis of reporting Notes Contents 1.1 Significant changes in the current reporting period The financial position and performance of the Ørsted Group was particularly affected by the following events and transactions during 2020. For a detailed discussion about the Ørsted Group’s performance and financial position, please refer to our management’s review on pages 4 to 60. IFRS 2020 COVID-19 Divestments/discontinued operations Accounting policy COVID-19 We have analysed the impacts that COVID-19 had on our financial reporting. Our operations and financial performance remains very solid despite the COVID-19 pandemic, and we identified no significant impact on our financial reporting in 2020. We did not receive any governmental support in relation to COVID-19. Danish power distribution, residential customers, and city light businesses In August, we completed the divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses to SEAS-NVE (now Andel). The divestment marks an important strategic milestone for Ørsted and completes our portfolio transformation into a global renewable energy company. The transaction resulted in proceeds of DKK 20.5 billion and a gain of DKK 10.9 billion. See note 3.4 ‘Divestment of enterprises’. LNG In December, we completed the divestment of our LNG business to Glencore, resulting in a cash outflow of DKK 1.5 billion. See note 3.4 ‘Divestment of enterprises’. UK B2B gas and power portfolio In September, we signed an agreement to divest the vast majority of our UK B2B customer portfolio to Total Gas & Power. We will keep some of our strategic long-term partners and customers to whom we deliver risk management products. We expect the transaction to close in Q1 2021. Discontinued operations As the remaining selling price regarding the divestment of our Oil & Gas business back in 2017 was received in 2020 from INEOS, we decided to end the reporting on discontinued operations as per 31 December 2020. Remaining provisions regarding tax indemnifications and payments related to the Fredericia stabilisation plant has been transferred to continuing operations at 31 December 2020. See note 3.7 ‘Discontinued operations’. Cease the use of business performance as of 1 January 2021 With the implementation of IFRS 9 in 2018, it has become significantly easier to apply IFRS hedge accounting to our commodity hedges. We have concluded that IFRS 9 can replace our business performance principle, and therefore, we will only be reporting based on IFRS from 1 January 2021. Thus, the business performance and adjustment columns will not be included in our financial reporting any more. This will simplify our reporting and avoid potential confilicts with future reporting requirements for alternative performance measures. See notes 1.4 ‘ Implementation of new standards or changed accounting standards and interpretations’ and 1.6 ‘Business performance’ for more information. 84 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 1. Basis of reporting Notes Contents 1.2 Basis of preparation This section provides an overall description of the accounting policies applied in our consoli- dated financial statements as well as the Euro- pean Single Electronic Format (ESEF) reporting requirements. We provide a more detailed description of the accounting policies applied in the specific notes. Key accounting estimates and judgements and new and amended IFRS standards and interpretations are discussed in detail in notes 1.3 ‘Key accounting estimates and judgements’ and 1.4 ‘Implementation of new or changed accounting standards and interpretations’, respectively. Basis of preparation The financial statements for the period 1 January - 31 December 2020 comprise the consolidated financial statements of Ørsted A/S and its subsidiaries (the Group) as well as separate financial statements for the parent company, Ørsted A/S. See page 178 for the parent company’s accounting policies. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Inter- national Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU and further require- ments in the Danish Financial Statements Act (Årsregnskabsloven). The financial statements are presented in million Danish kroner (DKK), unless otherwise stated. Measurement basis The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on historical cost basis, except for derivatives, gas in non-Danish storage facilities, financial instruments in the trading portfolio, and carbon emission allowances in the trading portfolio which are measured at market value. The accounting policies have been applied consistently in the financial year and for the comparative figures. Principles for consolidation The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Ørsted A/S (the parent company) and subsidiaries controlled by Ørsted A/S. See more in note 8.5 ‘Company overview’. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared as a consolidation of the parent company’s and the individual subsidiaries’ financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with the Group’s accounting policies. Intra- group income, expenses, shareholdings, balances, and dividends as well as realised and unrealised gains and losses arising from intra-group transactions are eliminated on consolidation. Unrealised gains resulting from transactions with associates and joint ventures are elimi- nated to the extent of our ownership interest. Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealised gains to the extent that there has been no impairment. Enterprises are accounted for as associates if we hold or have the ability to exercise, directly or indirectly, 20-50 % of the voting rights and do not exercise control. However, we carry out a specific assessment of our ability to exercise influence, including our ability to influence financial and operational decisions and thus our return. Enterprises that satisfy the criteria for joint control are accounted for as invest- ments in joint ventures, unless the nature of the joint arrangement is considered a joint operation, see our key accounting judgement for ‘Consolidation method for partnerships’ in the next column. Our shares in joint operations are recognised in the consolidated balance sheet through recognition of the Group’s own assets, liabili- ties, income, and expenses. The proportionate share of realised and unrealised gains and losses arising from intra-group transactions between fully consolidated enterprises and joint operations is eliminated. Key accounting judgement Consolidation method for partnerships On establishment of partnerships and in connection with any restructuring of existing partnerships, we assess whether the structure is a joint arrangement under shared control. For joint arrangements, we subsequently assess whether they are joint ventures or joint operations. In assessing joint operations, we look at: – the corporate form of the operation – whether we are only entitled to the net profit (loss) or to income and expenses resulting from the operation. In addition, the fact that the parties buy or are assigned all output, for example the power generated, will lead to the structure being considered a joint operation if we have joint control. 85 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 1. Basis of reporting Notes Contents Foreign currency translation For each reporting enterprise in the Group, items are determined in the currency of the primary economic environment in which the individual reporting enterprise operates (functional currency). Transactions in curren- cies other than the functional currency of each enterprise are accounted for as trans- actions in foreign currencies and translated on initial recognition at the exchange rate on the transaction date. Exchange differences arising between the exchange rate on the transaction date and on the date of payment are recog- nised in profit (loss) for the year as financial income or expenses. Receivables, payables, and other monetary items in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rates on the balance sheet date. The difference between the exchange rate on the balance sheet date and on the date at which the receivable or payable arose is recognised in profit (loss) for the year as financial income or expenses. For foreign subsidiaries, joint operations, associates, and joint ventures, the statements of comprehensive income are translated at monthly average exchange rates insofar as these do not deviate materially from the actual exchange rates at the transaction dates. Balance sheet items are translated at the exchange rates on the balance sheet date. All exchange differences are recognised in profit (loss) for the year, except for exchange differences arising on: – translation of the opening equity of these entities at the exchange rates on the balance sheet date – translation of the statements of compre- hensive income of these enterprises from ‘the average-for-the-month exchange rates’ to ‘the exchange rates on the balance sheet date’ – translation of balances accounted for as part of the total net investment – translation of the portion of loans and derivatives that has been entered into to hedge the net investment in these enter- prises, and that provides an effective hedge against corresponding foreign exchange gains (losses) on the net investment in the enterprise. The above types of exchange differences are recognised in other comprehensive income. Such exchange rate adjustments are divided between the equity of the parent company and the equity of the non-controlling interests. On full or partial divestment of the net investment, the accumulated exchange rate adjustments are recognised as follows: – Disposal resulting in loss of control: The accumulated exchange rate adjust- ments, including any associated hedges, are recognised in the profit (loss) for the year if a foreign exchange gain (loss) is realised by the selling enterprise. Any foreign exchange gain (loss) is transferred to the item in which the gain (loss) from the disposal is recognised. The part of the foreign currency translation reserve that relates to non- controlling interests is not transferred to profit (loss) for the year. – Disposal not resulting in loss of control: A proportionate share of the foreign currency translation reserve is transferred from the parent company shareholders’ share of equity to the minority shareholders’ share of equity. Repayment of balances that are considered part of the net investment does not constitute a partial disposal of the subsidiary. European Single Electronic Format (ESEF) As we are a Group with securities listed on a regulated market within the EU, we are from 2021 required to prepare our annual report using the XHTML format and to tag the primary consolidated financial statements using Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language (iXBRL). This iXBRL format makes the annual report readable for both human and machines. The annual report we submitted to the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority consists of the XHTML document together with some technical files, all included in a ZIP file named ORST-2020-12-31.zip. For convenience, a PDF version of the annual report is published in line with previous years. Key definitions: – XHTML (eXtensible HyperText Markup Language) is a text-based markup language used to structure and mark up content such as text, images, and hyperlinks in documents that are displayed as Web pages. – iXBRL tags (or Inline XBRL tags) are hidden meta-information embedded in the source code of an XHTML document in accordance with the Inline XBRL 1.1 specification, which enables the conversion of XHTML-formatted information into a machine-readable XBRL data record by appropriate software. iXBRL tags shall comply with the ESEF taxonomy, which is included in the ESEF Regulation and developed based on the IFRS taxonomy published by the IFRS Foundation. – The tagging process is a process where iXBRL tags are applied to financial state- ment line items, etc. If a financial statement line item is not defined in the ESEF taxono- my, an extension to the taxonomy is created. Extensions have to be anchored to elements in the ESEF taxonomy, except for extensions which are subtotals. – Taxonomy is an electronic dictionary of business reporting elements used to report business data. A taxonomy element is an element defined in a taxonomy that is used for the machine-readable labeling of information in an XBRL data record. 86 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 1. Basis of reporting Notes Contents 1.3 Key accounting estimates and judgements Hornsea 1, off the Yorkshire coast, the UK. The use of resonable estimates and judge- ments is an essential part of the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. Given the uncertainties inherent in our business activities, we make a number of estimates and judgements. The estimates and judgements are based on assumptions concerning future developments which affect our application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, sales, costs, cash flows, and related disclosures. Actual amounts may differ from the amounts estimated and judgements made, as more detailed information becomes available. We regularly reassess these estimates and judgements, based among other things on historical experience, the current situation in the financial markets, and a number of other relevant factors, ie. the update in the annual estimated production. Accounting estimates, judgements and assump tions which may entail a risk of material adjustments in subsequent years are listed in the table below. In addition, we make judgements when we apply the accounting policies. Reference is made to the specific notes for further information on the key accounting estimates and judgements as well as the assumptions applied. Note 1.2 2.2 2.6 3.1 3.2 5.2 Basis of preparation Consolidation method for partnerships Key accounting estimates and judgements Revenue Assessment of assumptions for recognition of revenue from the construction of offshore wind farms over time1 Assumptions for the determination of the expected selling pice and costs1 Other operating income and expenses Estimates for variable selling price related to divestments of offshore wind farms and offshore transmission assets Estimate/ judgement Judgement Judgement Estimate Estimate Intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment Assumptions used in value-in-use calculations for impairment testing Estimate Provisions Assumptions for provisions Tax on profit (loss) for the year Estimates regarding recognition of income taxes Estimate Estimate 1 Only relevant for comparatives. Impact of accounting estimates and judgements Impact of accounting estimates and judgements relates to objectivity and business practice. Very objective/market-conforming Objective/partially conforming Partially subjective/partially distinctive Subjective/distinctive for Ørsted 87 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 1. Basis of reporting Notes Contents 1.4 Implementation of new or changed accounting standards and interpretations We regularly assess the impact of new IFRS standards and interpretations. We implement new IFRS standards and interpretations from their mandatory effective dates at the latest. Effective from 1 January 2020, we have implemented the following amendments to standards (IAS and IFRS) and interpretations: – Amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8: Definition of Material. – Amendments to IFRS 3: Definition of a Business. – Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7: Interest Rate Benchmark Reform. The adoption of the new and amended standards has not impacted our consolidated financial statements for 2020. Cease the use of business performance as of 1 January 2021 With the implementation of IFRS 9 in 2018, it has become significantly easier to apply IFRS hedge accounting to our commodity hedges. We have concluded that IFRS 9 can replace our business performance principle, for which reason we only will be reporting based on IFRS from 1 January 2021. Thus, the business performance and adjust- ment columns will no longer be included. This will simplify our reporting and avoid potential conflicts with future reporting requirements for alternative performance measures. Among other things, IFRS 9 has made it easier to apply hedge accounting by the removal of the 80-125 % effectiveness requirement which can be difficult to comply with at all times when we engage in proxy hedging. An example of proxy hedging is when we hedge our power exposure 4-5 years into the future with gas hedges due to illiquidity in the market for power hedges with this time horison. At the end of 2020, the value of our business performance hedges deferred to a future period amounted to a loss of DKK 2,685 million. This loss has already been recognised in the income statement under IFRS, as we have not previously applied hedge accounting for these. Consequently, for the period 2021-2025, EBITDA (according to IFRS) will be higher with a similar amount compared to what the business performance EBITDA would have been in the same period, if we had continued to report based on this principle. See also note 1.6. New standards and interpretations IASB has issued amended standards which have not yet entered into force, and which have consequently not been incorporated into the consolidated financial statements for 2020. None of these amended standards and interpretations are expected to have any significant impact on our financial statements. Installation of the two wind turbines that form Coastal Virginia Wind, off the coast of Virginia Beach, the US. 88 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 1. Basis of reporting Notes Contents 1.5 Alternative performance measures Performance measures are calculated in accordance with the business performance principle. Business performance Business performance is a supplement to our financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. Under the business performance principle, the value of the hedging transaction is deferred and recognised for the period in which the hedged risk materialises. Reference is made to note 1.6 ‘Business performance’. Gross investments Gross investments reflect our total investments in assets and enterprises. It comprises cash flows from investing activities, excluding dividends received from associates, joint ventures and equity investments, purchase and sale of securities, loans to joint ventures and joint operations, and divestments of assets and enterprises. To this is added acquired debt and restricted cash in connection with acquisitions. Net investments Net investments are gross investments less divestments of assets and enterprises, the selling price for non-controlling interests, and subsequent capital injections from non-controlling interests. Furthermore, interest-bearing debt transferred in connection with a divestment is deducted. Funds from operations (FFO) Funds from operations are a supplementary statement for cash flows from operating activities determined as business performance EBITDA less the effect of gains on the divestments of assets, interest expenses (net) on interest-bearing net debt and hybrid capital (50 %) as well as interest elements of decommissioning obligations and current tax. Adjusted interest- bearing net debt Adjusted interest-bearing net debt is interest-bearing net debt plus 50 % of the hybrid capital, cash and securities not available for use (except for repo transactions), and the present value of decommissioning obligations less deferred tax. FFO to adjusted interest- bearing net debt FFO Adjusted interest-bearing net debt Average capital employed Return on capital employed (ROCE) Proposed dividend per share (DPS) Dividend yield Average number of shares Capital employed beginning of year + capital employed at year-end 2 EBIT Average capital employed Total proposed dividend Number of shares at year-end Dividend per share (proposed) Share price on the last trading day of the year 1 × Number of days Number of days ∑ i=1 = X1 Net working capital Net working capital is inventories, contract assets (net), trade receivables, and other current operating assets less trade payables, other current operating liabilities, and working capital elements of tax equity balances. Net working capital, excluding trade payables relating to purchases of intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment. Net working capital, excluding trade payables relating to capital expenditure Other definitions Free cash flow (FCF) Free cash flows are cash flows from operating activities less gross investments and plus divestments. Profit (loss) per share Shareholders’ share of the profit (loss) for the period Average number of shares Capital employed Capital employed are all assets and liabilities, except for equity and interest- bearing net debt. Diluted profit (loss) per share Shareholders’ share of the profit (loss) for the period Average number of shares, including dilutive effect of free shares 89 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 1. Basis of reporting Notes Contents 1.6 Business performance Cease the use of business performance as of 1 January 2021 The reason for abolishing business performance is described in note 1.4 section ‘Cease the use of business performance as of 1 January 2021’. Consequently as of 1 January 2021, we will ap- ply hedge accounting to all commodity hedges and related currency hedges except for hedges related to our gas portfolio which account for approx. 14 % of our total commodity hedges. Until we are ready to apply hedge accounting to these hedges, the change in fair value will be recognised through profit or loss. We expect to implement hedge accounting to hedges in our gas portfolio during the first half of 2021. Description of business performance In 2011, we introduced an alternative performance measure, business performance, as a supplement to the financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. The business performance results reflect our internal risk management and show the results for the period under review. Under the business performance principle, the value of the hedging transaction is deferred and recognised for the period in which the hedged risk materialises. This is illustrated in the example overleaf. Our reason for introducing the business per formance principle was that: – we could not achieve the same timing of recognition of our commercial exposure and hedging contracts in accordance with the IFRS rules, for example with respect to option premiums and certain commercial fixed-price contracts – there was a high risk that the hedging contracts were not consistent with the IFRS hedge accounting rules, requiring us to recognise the hedging contracts at market value with value adjustments via the income statement, whereas our commercial exposure is accrued. Type of hedging IFRS Business performance Hedging of energy and associated currency risks as well as fixed-price physical gas and power contracts Market value adjustments of power hedges related to Onshore are recognised in other comprehensive income. Other market value adjustment are recognised in the income statement Market value adjustments are deferred and recognised in the period in which the exposure materialises Hedging of: – proceeds from the divestment of newly constructed offshore wind farms Market value adjustments are deferred and recognised in the period in which the exposure materialises – interest and inflation risks Recognition is the same as under IFRS Hedging of currency risks associated with investments in foreign entities Market value adjustments are recognised in other comprehensive income Recognition is the same as under IFRS Trading portfolio Market value adjustments are recognised in the income statement Recognition is the same as under IFRS Only the recognition of the hedging of energy and associated currency risks as well as fixed- price physical gas and power contracts differs under IFRS and the business performance principle. Recognition In the income statement, the business performance results are shown alongside the IFRS results. The difference between the two performance measures is shown in a separate column, ‘Adjustments’. Two types of contracts are included in the business performance principle: – Hedging contracts concerning energy and related currencies. – Commercial contracts concerning energy recognised at market value (typically fixed- price physical gas and power contracts). When we use hedging instruments which do not fully correspond to the underlying risk, any difference between the hedging instruments and the underlying risk is recognised imme- diately in the income statement. See note 7.3 ‘ Energy trading portfolio’. The accounting treat- ment under business performance is other wise identical to the accounting treatment under IFRS. Our assets, liabilities, cash flows, and equity are consequently not affected. The accounting treatment of our hedging contracts according to IFRS and business performance is summarised in the table below. 90 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 1. Basis of reporting Notes Contents Expected impact on business performance EBITDA from energy and currency hedging At 31 December 2020, a loss of DKK 671 mil- lion would have been deferred (2019: gain of DKK 1,434 million) and affected business performance EBITDA in subsequent years if we had continued with the business performance principle. Of this, a gain of DKK 68 million is expected in EBITDA in 2021. Power prices increased in 2020, which means that the market value of the hedges has de- creased as we are selling power. The decrease in the deferred loss on currency hedging is primarily attributable to a decrease in the GBP/ DKK rate causing a gain as we are selling GBP. Power Gas Oil Coal Currency Expected impact on EBITDA from energy and currency hedging, DKKm Deferred for subsequent recognition at 31 December 2020 Deferred for subsequent recognition at 31 December 2019 2021 2022 After 2022 Total 2020 2021 After 2021 (1,052) (790) (320) (2,162) 13 20 (8) (85) 65 (205) 64 23 (5) 1 (166) (937) 121 - - 21 (31) - (306) (636) 24 57 (16) (7) (557) (2,685) 210 1,209 1,004 - 64 (30) 702 48 (33) (188) 499 46 - (45) (382) 53 9 (3) (374) (697) 46 - - (50) 15 (1) - (886) (922) 929 585 - Total (462) 770 56 (36) (1,448) (1,120) 1,021 585 (45) 144 100 492 736 187 157 649 993 68 221 1,725 2,014 188 203 2,163 2,554 (1,044) (716) 1,089 (671) 687 (494) 1,241 1,434 Total business performance hedges (1,112) IFRS power hedges IFRS inflation and interest hedges IFRS currency hedges Deferred gain/losses from US power purchase agreements Total IFRS hedges and US PPAs impacting EBITDA Total hedges, etc., impacting business performance The table shows when the deferred value ad- justments are expected to be recognised in the EBITDA. The business performance hedges does not impact the IFRS numbers as they have already been recognised under IFRS as they occurred. The IFRS EBITDA for 2021 will therefore be DKK 1,112 million higher than what the business perfor- mance EBITDA would have been. In total, business performance hedges of DKK -2,685 million will not be recog- nised in 2021 and after. Explanation of the business performance principle In year 1, we enter into a contract hedging the price risk associated with Offshore’s generation of 1,000GWh in year 5 at GBP 52,000 per GWh. This ensures a total revenue of GBP 52 million. In year 5, the cost of power has decreased to GBP 45,000 per GWh, which means that the hedging contract has a positive market value of GBP 7 million (a hedged price of GBP 52,000 per GWh minus the spot price of GBP 45,000 per GWh). This means that we ensure that the total income, including the hedging transaction, is still GBP 52 million. The income of GBP 52 million con- sists of a gain from the hedging contract of GBP 7 million and GBP 45 million from the sale of 1,000 GWh at a spot price of GBP 45,000 per GWh. The financial impact of the hedging transaction in years 1-5 is shown in the table. Under the business performance principle, the hedging trans- action is recognised in the income state- ment in year 5, i.e. at the same time as the hedged contract with a positive market value of GBP 7 million. The value develop- ment is, however, recognised continuously in the income statement according to IFRS. Upon the expiry of the contract in year 5, the total effect on results over the period is the same under the IFRS and the business performance principle. Only the timing differs. Power price and sale of power, GBP million Recognised in the income statement as follows Total financial impact Power price (GBP ’000 per GWh) Sale of power, GBP million Market value Business performance Business performance IFRS Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total 52 50 55 46 45 - - - - 45 45 - 2 (3) 6 7 - - - - 7 7 - 2 (5) 9 1 7 - - - - 52 52 IFRS - 2 (5) 9 46 52 Example of recognition of the market value of a hedging contract according to the business performance and IFRS principles in the income statement. 91 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 1. Basis of reporting Notes Contents Difference between IFRS and business performance for the year The value adjustment in respect of future periods totalled a loss of DKK 979 million (2019: DKK +141 million), and reversal of deferred gains (losses) recognised according to business performance in 2020 totalled DKK -547 million (2019: DKK 1,395 million). Market value adjustments for the year related to hedging contracts 2020 was mainly affected by losses on the hedging of power as a result of an increase in power prices combined with a selling position. This was partly countered by gains on curren- cy hedges, mainly related to a decrease in the GBP/DKK rate as a result of a selling position. Deferred gains (losses) from previous periods In 2020, a gain of DKK 547 million was recognised in business performance EBITDA, but as the gain was recognised in IFRS EBITDA in a previous period, the gain was reversed in the ‘Adjustments’ column in the income statement. The gain was primarily attributable to the hedging of gas. Specification of the difference between EBITDA according to business performance and according to IFRS, DKKm EBITDA – business performance Business performance adjustments in respect of revenue for the year Business performance adjustments in respect of cost of sales for the year EBITDA – IFRS Total business performance adjustments for the year comprise: 2020 18,124 (2,450) 924 16,598 2019 17,484 2,556 (1,020) 19,020 Market value adjustments for the year of financial and physical hedging contracts relating to a future period (979) 141 Reversal of deferred gains (losses) relating to hedging contracts from previous periods where the hedged production or trade is recognised in business performance EBITDA in this period Total adjustments (547) (1,526) 1,395 1,536 Tugboat Rovan McAllister working on the construction of Coastal Virginia Wind, off the coast of Virginia Beach, the US. The table shows value adjustments by product. The value adjustments are recognised in IFRS EBITDA, but not in business performance EBITDA, as the value relates to future periods. The table shows reversal of value adjustments by product. These gains (losses) are recognised in business performance EBITDA. The reversal of value adjustment was recognised in IFRS EBITDA in a previous period. Market value adjustments for the year of financial and physical hedging contracts relating to a future period, DKKm Currency Power (commercial and hedge) Gas (commercial and hedge) Oil Coal Total value adjustments Reversal of deferred gains (losses) relating to hedging contracts from previous periods where the hedged production or trade is recognised in business performance EBITDA in this period, DKKm Currency Power (commercial and hedge) Gas (commercial and hedge) Oil Coal Total deferred gains (losses) from previous periods 2020 702 (1,669) (13) 5 (4) (979) 2020 188 10 (701) (77) 33 (547) 2019 (1,916) 1,144 857 94 (38) 141 2019 (320) 1,249 327 144 (5) 1,395 92 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Notes Contents 2. Return on capital employed 94 Return on capital employed 95 Segment information 98 Revenue 101 Cost of sales 102 Government grants 102 Research and development expenditures 103 Other operating income and expenses 104 Employee costs 105 Share-based payment Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents 2. Return on capital employed Return on capital employed (ROCE) is a key ratio showing how profitable our business activities are. Our target is an average ROCE of approx. 10 % for the Group for the 2019-2025 period. Return on capital employed Return on capital employed was 9.7 % in 2020 compared to 10.6 % in 2019, which was in line with our target of an average ROCE of approx. 10 % for the Group in the period 2019-2025. Reference is made to note 2.1 ‘Segment information’. Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy 6 % 13 % 0 EBIT by segment percentage of DKK 10,633 million in 2020 EBIT, business performance DKKbn 24.7 16.2 13.9 81 % 10.1 10.5 18.1 bn EBITDA totalled DKK 18,124 million in 2020 against DKK 17,484 million in 2019. 10.5 bn EBIT is stated according to the business performance principle. EBIT of DKK 10,633 million is calculated as EBIT for reportable segments. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Operating profit (EBIT) totalled DKK 10,536 million in 2020 against DKK 10,052 million in 2019. Return on capital employed (ROCE) % 32.1 24.4 25.2 9.7 % Return on capital employed totalled 9.7 % in 2020 against 10.6 % in 2019. 10.6 9.7 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 94 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents 2.1 Segment information Offshore, DKKm Revenue EBITDA Gross investments Number of employees 34,533 14,750 19,525 3,078 Primary activities Development, construction, ownership, and operation of offshore wind farms in the UK, Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands, the US, and Taiwan. Onshore, DKKm Revenue EBITDA Gross investments Number of employees 733 1,131 6,633 140 Primary activities Development, construction, ownership, and operation of onshore wind and solar farms in the US. Segment structure We run our business on an end-to-end value chain thinking. All activities and earnings that relate to Offshore and Onshore are reported in these segments, even if the daily activities are performed on behalf of the Group in Markets & Bioenergy. Therefore, revenue and earnings from trading related to hedging of our power exposures and power portfolio optimisation activities in relation to Offshore and Onshore are presented in these business units. In 2020, EBITDA of DKK 236 million (2019: DKK 725 million) and DKK 48 million (2019: DKK -18 million) were transferred to Offshore and Onshore, respectively. Geographical distribution of revenue as well as intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment Geographical revenue is broken down, as far as possible, by the customer’s geographical location based on supply point. A significant part of our sales takes place via power exchanges and gas hubs in Europe whose physical locations do not reflect the geo graphical locations of our customers. When breaking down these sales by geographi cal location, we use the physical locations of the exchange or hub since we do not know the physical location of our customers in all cases. No single customer accounted for more than 10 % of our consolidated revenue in 2020. In 2019, one customer in Offshore had a revenue of DKK 10,339 million, accounting for more than 10 % of our consolidated revenue. Non-current assets are broken down geo- graphically, based on the physical locations of the assets. Accounting policies Our operating segments are consistent with our internal reporting to our chief operating decision maker, the Executive Committee. We apply the business performance principle, as described in note 1.6 ‘Business performance’, in connection with our internal management. Revenue DKKm 2020 1 (2019) Denmark (DK) The UK The US Germany (DE) Intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment, DKKm 2020 (2019) The Netherlands (NL) Other Denmark (DK) The UK The US Germany (DE) The Netherlands (NL) Taiwan (TW) Other The operating segments are managed primarily on the basis of EBITDA and investments. Financial income, financial expenses, depreciation, and amortisations as well as tax are allocated to the operating segments, while we manage them at Group level. NL 3,871 (5,081) OTHER 302 (935) TW 8,190 (53) OTHER 87 (2,576) DK 11,360 (13,610) Segment income and segment expenses are those items that, in our internal management reporting, are directly attributable to individual segments or can be indirectly allocated to individual segments on a reliable basis. Markets & Bioenergy, DKKm Revenue EBITDA Gross investments Number of employees 21,420 2,136 715 1,009 DE 4,376 (7,060) US 2,535 (1,317) Primary activities (excluding divested activities) Generation of heat and power at CHP plants in Denmark, route-to-market activities for the Group and external partners, such as balancing power in the market, selling power and green certificates in the market, selling power and gas in wholesale and B2B markets, as well as optimisating and hedging of Ørsted’s entire energy portfolio. DKK 52,601 million DK 13,153 (16,607) NL 10,860 (4,685) DE 11,444 (12,809) US 31,757 (24,068) UK 28,364 (36,842) DKK 122,249 million Revenue, intangible assets as well as property, plant, and equipment are presented based on the locations of our customers and assets. UK 48,551 (48,884) 1 Revenue determined according to the business performance principle. 95 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents 2020 Income statement, DKKm External revenue Intra-group revenue Revenue Cost of sales Employee costs and other external expenses Gain (loss) on disposal of non-current assets Additional other operating income and expenses Share of profit (loss) in associates and joint ventures EBITDA Depreciation and amortisation Impairment losses Impairment losses, reversed Operating profit (loss) (EBIT) Key ratios Intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment Equity investments and non-current receivables Net working capital, work in progress Net working capital, tax equity Net working capital, capital expenditures Net working capital, other items Derivatives, net Assets classified as held for sale, net Decommissioning obligations Other provisions Tax, net Other receivables and other payables, net Capital employed at 31 December Return on capital employed (ROCE), % Cash flows from operating activities Gross investments Divestments Free cash flow (FCF) Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Reportable segments 29,903 4,630 34,533 (14,377) (6,624) 735 412 71 14,750 (6,106) - - 743 (10) 733 - (640) 34 1,004 - 1,131 (482) - - 21,733 (313) 21,420 (16,495) (2,831) 36 6 - 2,136 (796) - - 52,379 4,307 56,686 (30,872) (10,095) 805 1,422 71 18,017 (7,384) - - Other activities/ eliminations Business performance Adjustments 222 52,601 (2,450) (4,307)1 (4,085) 4,164 38 - (10) - 107 (204) - - - 52,601 (26,708) (10,057) 805 1,412 71 18,124 (7,588) - - - (2,450) 924 - - - - (1,526) - - - IFRS 50,151 - 50,151 (25,784) (10,057) 805 1,412 71 16,598 (7,588) - - 8,644 649 1,340 10,633 (97) 10,536 (1,526) 9,010 Profit (loss) and cash flows are shown only for continuing operations. The column ‘Other activities/eliminations’ primarily covers the elimination of inter- segment transactions. It also includes income and costs, assets and liabilities, investment activity, taxes, etc., handled at Group level. 89,257 452 9,775 23,325 - - - (7,246) (3,516) 3,251 (941) - (5,069) (3,826) 485 745 (499) (160) 156 - (659) (102) (1,894) - 8,234 181 - - (25) (895) (274) 793 (1,275) (1,990) 456 24 120,816 633 9,775 (7,246) (4,040) 2,196 (1,059) 793 (7,003) (5,918) (953) 769 90,613 12,921 5,229 108,763 9,985 (19,525) (149) (9,689) 3,921 (6,633) 114 (2,598) 2,855 (715) 19,060 21,200 16,761 (26,873) 19,025 8,913 1,433 144 - - - 32 850 - - (942) 182 (790) 909 (295) (94) 14 (375) 122,249 777 9,775 (7,246) (4,040) 2,228 (209) 793 (7,003) (6,860) (771) (21) 109,672 9.7 16,466 (26,967) 19,039 8,538 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 122,249 777 9,775 (7,246) (4,040) 2,228 (209) 793 (7,003) (6,860) (771) (21) 109,672 16,466 (26,967) 19,039 8,538 1 Including the elimin ation of other activities, the total elimination of intra-group revenue amounts to DKK -6,849 million which primarily relates to our Shared Functions services and B2B business as well as our B2C and power distribution businesses up until divestment. 96 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Reportable segments Other activities/ eliminations Business performance Adjustments 67,828 5,874 73,702 (47,480) (10,294) (96) 1,630 (20) 17,442 (6,643) (568) - 14 67,842 (5,874)1 (5,860) 5,664 251 (5) (8) - 42 (221) - - - 67,842 (41,816) (10,043) (101) 1,622 (20) 17,484 (6,864) (568) - 2,556 - 2,556 (1,020) - - - - 1,536 - - - IFRS 70,398 - 70,398 (42,836) (10,043) (101) 1,622 (20) 19,020 (6,864) (568) - Profit (loss) and cash flows are shown only for continuing operations. The column ‘Other activities/eliminations’ primarily covers the elimination of inter- segment transactions. It also includes income and costs, assets and liabilities, investment activity, taxes, etc., handled at Group level. 10,231 (179) 10,052 1,536 11,588 2019 Income statement, DKKm External revenue Intra-group revenue Revenue Cost of sales Employee costs and other external expenses Gain (loss) on disposal of non-current assets Additional other operating income and expenses Share of profit (loss) in associates and joint ventures EBITDA Depreciation and amortisation Impairment losses Impairment losses, reversed Operating profit (loss) (EBIT) Key ratios Intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment Equity investments and non-current receivables Net working capital, work in progress Net working capital, tax equity Net working capital, capital expenditures Net working capital, other items Derivatives, net Assets classified as held for sale, net Decommissioning obligations Other provisions Tax, net Other receivables and other payables, net Capital employed at 31 December Of which, capital employed from discontinued operations Of which, capital employed from continuing operations Return on capital employed (ROCE), % Cash flows from operating activities Gross investments Divestments Free cash flow (FCF) 33,801 6,415 40,216 (18,981) (6,440) (106) 490 (18) 15,161 (5,494) - - 9,667 78,483 650 8,756 670 - 670 (6) (528) 21 629 - 786 (351) (68) - 367 17,616 - - - (4,587) (3,123) 3,441 (961) - (4,562) (3,878) 1,065 (424) 79,447 9,283 (15,121) 3,052 (2,786) (67) 9 545 - (306) - (1,409) (67) 11,734 1,007 (6,158) 255 (4,896) 33,357 (541) 32,816 (28,493) (3,326) (11) 511 (2) 1,495 (798) (500) - 197 8,743 263 - - (114) (1,277) 2,058 8,211 (1,290) (1,836) 951 80 104,842 913 8,756 (4,587) (3,304) 2,173 1,642 8,211 (6,158) (5,714) 607 (411) 15,789 106,970 1,218 (1,898) 25 (655) 11,508 (23,177) 3,332 (8,337) 1,843 131 - - - 367 (860) - - (729) (860) (70) (178) 1,571 (128) (3) 1,440 106,685 1,044 8,756 (4,587) (3,304) 2,540 782 8,211 (6,158) (6,443) (253) (481) 106,792 (41) 106,833 10.6 13,079 (23,305) 3,329 (6,897) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 106,685 1,044 8,756 (4,587) (3,304) 2,540 782 8,211 (6,158) (6,443) (253) (481) 106,792 (41) 106,833 13,079 (23,305) 3,329 (6,897) 1 Including the elimination of other activities, the total elimination of intra-group revenue amounts to DKK -8,425 million which primarily relates to our Shared Functions services as well as our B2B, B2C, and power distribution businesses. 97 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents 2.2 Revenue Revenue 2020, DKKm Sale of gas Generation of power Sale of power Revenue from construction of offshore wind farms and transmission assets Generation and sale of heat and steam Distribution and transmission Other revenue Total revenue from customers, IFRS Government grants Economic hedging Miscellaneous revenue Total revenue, IFRS Adjustments, see note 1.6 Total revenue, business performance Timing of revenue recognition from customers, IFRS At a point in time Over time Total revenue from customers, IFRS Revenue from sale of goods and services, IFRS Revenue from sale of goods Revenue from sale of services Total revenue, IFRS The timing of transfer of goods or services to customers is categorised as follows: ‘At a point in time’ mainly comprises: – sale of gas or power in the market, e.g. North Pool, TTF, NBP – transmission assets for offshore wind farms at farm-down. ‘Over time’ mainly comprises: – construction agreements for offshore wind farms and transmission assets – long-term contracts with customers to deliver gas, heat, or power. (4,264) 12,417 Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Other activities/ eliminations - 4,969 10,970 3,371 - - 2,433 21,743 12,122 337 33 34,235 298 34,533 12,775 8,968 21,743 - 465 - - - - 7 472 28 139 75 714 19 733 472 - 472 8,619 1,866 5,711 - 2,761 1,559 198 20,714 401 (617) (1,979) 18,519 2,901 21,420 3,999 16,715 20,714 - - - - (4) 169 (4,099) - 640 142 (3,317) (768) (4,085) (4,099) - (4,099) 34,235 714 18,519 (3,317) 2020 Total 8,619 7,300 3,371 2,761 1,555 2,807 38,830 12,551 499 (1,729) 50,151 2,450 52,601 13,147 25,683 38,830 46,088 4,063 50,151 Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Other activities/ eliminations - 4,870 10,372 12,385 - - 1,868 29,495 9,934 (492) 621 39,558 658 40,216 12,839 16,656 29,495 - 427 - - - - - 427 29 231 (3) 684 (14) 670 427 - 427 15,341 2,377 7,593 - 2,887 2,555 669 31,422 505 1,383 3,189 36,499 (3,683) 32,816 11,099 20,323 31,422 (27) - (5,825) - - (3) (35) (5,890) - (530) 77 (6,343) 483 (5,860) (5,890) - (5,890) 39,558 684 36,499 (6,343) 2019 Total 15,314 7,674 12,140 12,385 2,887 2,552 2,502 55,454 10,468 592 3,884 70,398 (2,556) 67,842 18,475 36,979 55,454 65,914 4,484 70,398 Revenue for the year (business performance) decreased by 22 % to DKK 52,601 million in 2020. The decrease was mainly due to significantly lower gas and power prices relative to last year, lower gas volumes sold, limited construction work on wind farms for partners, and a decrease in thermal heat generation. This was only partly offset by the divestment of the Walney Extension transmission asset and the increase in government grants, mainly due to receipt of CfDs of another 400 MW related to Hornsea 1 from April 2020, ramp-up of generation from Hornsea 1 and Borssele 1 & 2 as well as higher wind speeds across the portfolio. Other revenue in Offshore primarily related to operations and maintenance agreeements, which increased due to ramp-up of generation from Hornsea 1 and Borssele 1 & 2 in 2020. 98 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents Unsatisfied long-term contracts with customers, DKKm 2020 2019 31 December Within one year In more than one year 0 1,345 0 % 100 % 0 % 0 % Expected to be recognised Accounting policies Unsatisfied long-term contracts Our remaining performance obligations expected to be recognised in more than one year relate to the construction of wind farms and offshore transmission assets. The transaction price allocated to the remaining per- formance obligation (unsatisfied or partially satisfied). In accordance with IFRS 15, the overview does not include revenue from contracts with customers to deliver gas, heat, and power, or our operations and maintenance agreements. For these types of goods and services, we recognise the revenue that corresponds directly to the value transferred to the customer. Key accounting estimate Key accounting judgement Assumptions for the determination of the expected selling price and costs We make estimates when determining the expected selling price of individual construction agreements. These estimates are influenced by our assessment of: – the degree of completion of the individual off- shore wind farm and offshore transmission assets – total expected costs for the individual contract – the value of the incentive agreements under which we may be paid a bonus for early delivery or have to pay compensation for late delivery – the guarantee commitments undertaken – the share of total costs associated with transmis- Assumptions for recognition of revenue from the construction of offshore wind farms over time We construct offshore wind farms with partners where we construct our partner’s share of the wind farm. We assess each construction agreements at the time of conclusion of the agreements. In our view, our partner assumes control of the offshore wind farm in step with construction. This is supported by: – the regular approval of part deliveries – the approval or rejection of significant variations to the construction – the partner’s takeover of work from the subcon- sion assets which are expected to be covered upon handover, etc. tractors, both concerning risk and legal title to the wind farm on an on-going basis Revenue is measured based on the consideration specified in a contract with a customer (transaction price) and excludes amounts collected on behalf of third parties, i.e. VAT. We recognise revenue when we transfer control over a product or service to a customer or a partner. If a part of the transaction price is variable, i.e. bonus payments, incentive payments for unmissed dead- lines, etc., the variable consideration is recognised in revenue when it is highly probable that the revenue will not be reversed in subsequent periods. We adjust the transaction price for the time value of money if the payments exceed twelve months. Sales agreements are divided into individually identi- fiable performance obligations. If a sales agreement includes several performance obligations, the sales agreement’s transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation’s stand-alone selling price. Sale of gas Types of goods and services Revenue from the sale of gas includes the sale of gas sourced from other producers. Timing of satisfaction of delivery obligations and significant estimates Revenue is recognised when control of the gas is transferred to the buyer. Transfer of control occurs either when the gas is injected into the distribution system or physically delivered to the customer. Significant terms of payment and associated estimates and judgements Sales contracts for a fixed amount of gas at a variable price, or where we are exclusive suppliers to the customer at a variable price, are considered one performance obligation with multiple deliveries to be satisfied over time. For such contracts, we recognise revenue in the amount up to which we have a right to invoice. renegotiations are not included in revenue before we know the outcome of the individual renegotiations. In most cases, the consideration for the gas is due when the gas is injected into the distribution system or delivered to the customer. The delivery of gas is invoiced on a monthly basis, and the payment is due within 10-30 days. Sale of power Types of goods and services Revenue from the sale of power includes the sale of power sourced from other producers. Timing of satisfaction of delivery obligations and significant estimates Revenue is recognised when control of the goods is transferred to the buyer. Transfer of control occurs when the actual power is delivered to the customer. Significant terms of payment and associated estimates and judgements Sales contracts for a fixed amount of power at a variable price, or where we are exclusive suppliers to the customer at a variable price, are considered one performance obligation with multiple deliveries to be satisfied over time. For such contracts and for long- term agreements on selling power at a fixed price, we recognise revenue in the amount up to which we have a right to invoice. In most cases, the consideration for the power is due when the actual power is delivered to the customer. The delivery of power is invoiced on a monthly basis, and the payment is due within 10-30 days. Generation of power Types of goods and services Revenue from generation of power is our sale of power produced at our own wind farms and power plant and the sale of ancillary services. Timing of satisfaction of delivery obligations, and significant estimates Revenue is recognised when control of the goods is transferred to the buyer. Transfer of control occurs when the actual power is delivered to the customer, which for power generated by us occurs when it is produced. 99 / 193 Therefore, our determination of profit and the recognition of revenue and related contract assets are subject to significant uncertainty. We believe that our estimates are the likely outcome of future events. – the milestone payments from the partner. Therefore, revenue is recognised over time during the construction of the offshore wind farms. Some long-term gas sales contracts include clauses which give the right to renegotiate the fixed sales prices. Expectations for the outcomes of Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents Significant terms of payment and associated estimates and judgements Revenue from ancillary services consists of fees for having power plants on standby and/or immediately ready to increase or decrease the generation of power by an agreed amount to balance the demand and supply in the system. Ancillary services are con- sidered one performance obligation which is fulfilled over time when the power plants are on standby and/or immediately ready to increase or decrease the generation of power. Sales contracts for a fixed amount of power at a variable price, or where we are exclusive suppliers to the customer at a variable price, are considered one performance obligation with multiple deliveries to be satisfied over time. For such contracts and for long- term agreements on selling power at a fixed price, we recognise revenue in the amount up to which we have a right to invoice. In most cases, the consideration for the power is due when the actual power is delivered to the customer. Ancillary services are invoiced on a monthly basis, and consideration is payable when invoiced. Revenue from construction of offshore wind farms Types of goods and services Revenue from construction of offshore wind farms includes development and construction. The construction agreements cover the construction phase from design to delivery of an operational asset. The agreement consists of two performance obligations: – Offshore wind farms. – Offshore transmission assets, if applicable. The construction agreements cover our partners’ shares of the construction of the wind farm and offshore transmission assets, if applicable. If the contracts include multiple performance obliga- tions, the transaction price will be allocated to each performance obligation based on the stand-alone selling prices. Where these are not directly observ- able, they are estimated based on the expected cost-plus margin. Timing of satisfaction of delivery obligations, and significant estimates We recognise revenue from the construction agreements over time, using an input method to measure progress towards complete satisfaction of the performance obligation because the customer gains control of the offshore wind farm during the construction process. The input method reflects our ongoing transfer of control to the customer. When the outcome of the performance obligation in the contract can be measured reasonably, the construc- tion agreement is measured at the transaction price of the work performed less progress billings, based on the percentage of completion of the contract at balance sheet date and the total expected revenues from the individual contracts. We estimate the degree of completion on the basis of an assessment of the work performed, normally calcu- lated as the ratio between the costs incurred and the total costs expected related to the contract in question. The transaction price is based on the total expected income from individual contracts. Estimates of revenues are based on the transaction price and the completion degree of the offshore wind farm or off- shore transmission asset at the balance sheet date. Estimates of revenues, costs, and percentage of completion are revised if circumstances change. Any resulting increases or decreases in estimated revenue or costs are reflected in profit or loss in the period in which the circumstances that give rise to the revision come to our knowledge. An expected loss is recognised when it is deemed probable that the total construction costs will ex- ceed the total revenue from the individual contracts. Significant terms of payment and associated estimates and judgements The consideration for the construction of an offshore wind farm consists of a fixed fee and a relatively minor variable fee, depending on when the wind farm can be put into operation. The consideration for an offshore transmission asset is a fixed fee. After signing the construction agreement, we carry out an assessment determining when the wind farm is expected to be completed, and calculate the size of the variable payment on this basis. We only recognise the variable fee when it is highly probable that a subsequent reversal will not take place. At each balance sheet date, an assessment is made of the size of the variable payment which can be included in the transaction price. Revenue is adjusted accordingly. The customer pays the fixed consideration based on a payment schedule. The payment schedule is de- termined and based on the expected progress of the construction and transfer of control to the customer. Significant terms of payment and associated estimates and judgements Revenue is calculated as the amount to which we are entitled when the service is delivered to the customer and invoiced on a monthly basis, and consideration is payable when invoiced. Other revenue Types of goods and services Other revenue primarily includes operations and maintenance agreements and other services. If the work we have performed exceeds invoicing on account, a contract asset is recognised. If the payments exceed the work we have performed, a contract liability is recognised. Generation and sale of heat Timing of satisfaction of delivery obligations and significant estimates Heat is sold under long-term heat contracts. Revenue is recognised when control is transferred to the customer. Transfer of control occurs when the heat is physically delivered to the customer. In connection with a biomass conversion of a CHP plant, the heat customer makes a prepayment to finance the majority of our CAPEX associated with the conversion. The prepayment is recognised as a contract liability. The contract liability is recognised as revenue in step with the transfer of heat to the customer. Significant terms of payment and associated estimates and judgements Payment for the sale of heat consists of fixed costs associated with operations and maintenance of a CHP plant, fuel costs for the generation of heat, and a financial return. The delivery of heat is invoiced on a monthly basis, and the payment is due within 10-30 days. Distribution and transmission Timing of satisfaction of delivery obligations and significant estimates Revenue from the distribution and transmission of gas and power is recognised when the gas or power is delivered to the buyer, or when the capacity is made available. Timing of satisfaction of delivery obligations and significant estimates Revenue from providing services is recognised in the accounting period in which the services are rendered. For fixed-priced contracts, revenue is recognised based on the actual service rendered at the end of the reporting period as a proportion of the total services to be rendered because the customer receives and uses the benefits simultaneously. This is determined based on the actual labour hours spent relative to the total labour hours expected. Significant terms of payment and associated estimates and judgements The consideration for operations and maintenance agreements consists of a fixed fee and a minor variable fee, e.g. bonuses or compensation for wind farm availability. Availability bonuses will be recognised on an ongoing basis when it is highly probable that a subsequent reversal will not take place. Fixed-price contracts are invoiced on a monthly basis, and consideration is payable when invoiced. Variable fee services are generally due after the services are rendered. Warranty obligations We typically have a five-year responsibility to remedy defects that exist at the relevant takeover date when we construct offshore wind farms. These types of warranties are accounted for under IAS 37 ‘Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets’. Reference is made to the accounting policy on warranty provisions in note 3.2 ‘Provisions and contingent assets and liabilities’. 100 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents 2.3 Cost of sales Cost of sales, DKKm Offshore Onshore Gas Power Biomass Coal Distribution and transmission costs Costs for construction of offshore wind farms and transmission assets Other cost of sales Total, IFRS Adjustments Total, business performance - 10,871 - - 1,163 2,340 3 14,377 - 14,377 - - - - - - - - - - Markets & Bioenergy 6,023 3,358 2,182 559 2,517 - 266 14,905 1,590 16,495 Other activities/ eliminations - 2020 total 6,023 Offshore Onshore - (4,089) 10,140 10,086 - - (28) - 619 (3,498) (666) (4,164) 2,182 559 3,652 2,340 888 25,784 924 26,708 - - 921 7,957 17 18,981 - 18,981 Markets & Bioenergy 15,342 5,760 2,519 520 3,956 - 2,024 30,121 (1,628) 28,493 Other activities/ eliminations - (5,828) - - (24) - (420) (6,272) 608 (5,664) 2019 total 15,342 10,018 2,519 520 4,853 7,957 1,627 42,836 (1,020) 41,816 - - - - - - 6 6 - 6 Cost of sales according to business perfor- mance decreased by 36 % to DKK 26,708 million in 2020. The decrease was mainly due to lower gas prices relative to last year and lower gas volumes sold. Furthermore, we had limited construction work on wind farms for partners. In 2020, ‘Costs from construction of offshore wind farms and transmission assets’ primarily related to Coastal Virginia Wind as well as the the divestment of the Walney Extension transmission asset. Coastal Virginia Wind, off the coast of Virginia Beach, the US. 101 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents 2.4 Government grants 2.5 Research and develop- ment expenditures Energinet, the transmission system operator in Denmark, administers subsidies for environ- mentally sustainable power generation, including biomass and offshore wind farms. We regard the grant for environmentally sustainable power generation as a govern- ment grant, as it is paid by the Danish state. In the UK, we receive subsidies under the following schemes: contracts for difference (CfD) and the Renewable Obligations scheme (ROCs) for renewable energy projects. The Burbo Bank Extension, Walney Extension, and Hornsea 1 offshore wind farms are under the CfD regime, while our other UK offshore wind farms as well as our Renescience plant are under the ROC regime. We treat the payments from the ROC and CfD schemes as government grants. Fixed feed-in tariffs from our Dutch and German wind farms are also recognised as government grants. Accounting policies Government grants comprise grants for environ- mentally sustainable power generation, grants for the funding of development projects as well as investment grants, etc. Government grants are recognised when there is reasonable assurance that the grants will be received. Grants for the purchase of assets which we recognise in the balance sheet are recognised under deferred revenue and are transferred to other operating income in step with the depreciation of the assets to which the grants relate. As grants for power generation are intended as a compensation for the price of power, we system- atically recognise the grants under revenue in step with the power generation and thus the related revenue. Government grants, DKKm Government grants recognised in profit (loss) for the year under revenue Government grants recognised in profit (loss) for the year under other operating income Government grants recognised in the balance sheet 2020 12,551 4 (4) 2019 10,468 4 (4) Government grants recognised for the year 12,551 10,468 Expensed research and development expenditures DKKm Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy 2020 total Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Research 80 Development 1,719 Total 1,799 - 123 123 - 13 13 80 120 1,855 1,935 1,815 1,935 - 117 117 - 8 8 2019 total 120 1,940 2,060 During the year, we expensed research and development costs amounting to DKK 1,935 million (2019: DKK 2,060 million). Accounting policies Research costs are costs incurred to analyse and optimise different aspects of offshore wind farm technology (e.g. improving offshore foundations and optimising blade stability and performance). Research costs are recognised in the income statement as incurred. Development costs primarly comprise salaries as well as internal and external costs which can be directly or indirectly attributed to design and devel- opment of new offshore and onshore wind farms and the Renescience Northwich plant. Development costs are expensed until the capitalisa- tion criteria are met. When the capitalisation criteria are met, devel- opment costs are capitalised as ‘Assets under construction’. 102 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents 2.6 Other operating income and expenses Other operating income, DKKm Gain on divestment of assets Other compensation US tax credits and tax attributes Miscellaneous operating income Total other operating income Other operating expenses, DKKm Loss on divestment of assets Miscellaneous operating expenses Total other operating expenses 2020 1,017 335 1,004 264 2,620 2020 212 191 403 - 478 629 674 1,781 2019 101 159 260 The increase in ‘US tax credits and tax attributes’ income was mainly due to the commissioning of three onshore wind farms in 2020. Other operating expenses ‘Loss on divestment of assets’ was primarily related to M&A transaction costs. Other operating income In 2020, other operating income was DKK 2,620 million, which was 47 % higher than in 2019. In 2020, ‘Gains on divestment of assets’ mainly related to the Hornsea 1 transmission asset where we lowered our assumption regarding the preferred bidder’s expected return requirement. In 2019, we had no gains related to divestment of assets. ‘Other compensation’ is primarily related to compensations regarding outages and curtailments, mainly from TenneT, the German grid operator. 2019 Accounting policies Key accounting estimate In connection with the divestment of ownership in- terests in offshore wind farms, the gain is recognised on the divestment date as other operating income in the income statement. Gains for future construction of the partner’s share of the offshore wind farm are recognised over time in the income statement in step with the construction. See notes 2.2 ‘Revenue’ and 4.2 ‘Contract assets and liabilities’. The accounting policies for ‘US tax credits and tax attributes’ income is described in note 4.5 ‘Tax equity liabilities’. Divestment of ownership interests in our offshore wind farms When we divest an ownership interest in an offshore wind farm to a partner, we typically also enter into agreements on the future construction and operation of the offshore wind farm. Contracts in connection with a divestment are typically agreements on: – The sale of shares (divestment of assets) (SPA). – The future construction of the offshore wind farm (construction agreements). – The future operation of the offshore wind farm (O&M agreements). Estimates for the variable selling price related to divestments of offshore wind farms and offshore transmission assets When we divest an ownership interest in an offshore wind farm and offshore transmission asset to a partner, we consider all terms and activities in the contracts in order to determine the transaction price. If the consideration includes a variable amount, we estimate the consideration to which we are entitled in exchange for transferring the assets, the wind farm, and the transmission assets to our partner. The variable considerations are estimated at contract inception based on future outcome of events, e.g.: – the divestment price of offshore transmission asset through competitive tender process – the impact on production from future wind farms – the winning bid of tender revenue stream through a competitive tender process. We consider ‘the most likely amount’ to provide the most appropriate estimate of the expected variable consideration. 103 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents 2.7 Employee costs Employee costs, DKKm Wages, salaries, and remuneration Share-based payment Pensions Other social security costs Other employee costs Employee costs before transfer to assets Transfer to assets Total employee costs Salaries and remuneration for the Executive Committee, and the Board of Directors, DKK ’000 Fixed salary Short-term cash-based incentive scheme Retention bonus, etc. Share-based payment Pension, incl. social security and benefits Short-term retention-dependent purchase price related to the acquisition of Lincoln Clean Energy Salary in notice period Termination payment Total 2020 4,623 21 364 155 58 5,221 (938) 4,283 2019 4,376 57 362 146 103 5,044 (1,092) 3,952 Employee costs ‘Employee costs before transfer to assets’ were 3.5 % higher in 2020 compared to 2019, mainly reflecting the increase in fixed salary and slightly higher average number of employees. ‘Employee costs transferred to assets’ relate to investment projects which are capitalised in the balance sheet. Pension plans and number of employees Pension plans are defined-contribution plans that do not commit Ørsted beyond the amounts contributed. In 2020, our average number of employees was 6,429 (2019: 6,329). The average number of employees in 2020 is impacted by the divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and the city light busi- nesses at the end of August 2020. Remuneration of the Executive Committee The remuneration of the Executive Committee is based on a fixed salary, including personal benefits, such as a company car, free tele- phone, etc., a variable salary, and share-based payment. The other members of the Executive Committee1 also receive a pension. The members of the Board of Directors are paid fixed remuneration only for their work in Ørsted. In addition, Ørsted reimburses any travel expenses. Other members of the Executive Committee1 Board of Directors Total Executive Board 2020 17,230 2019 16,810 2020 23,057 4,831 4,561 10,328 . - (519)3 4,046 959 3,910 2019 20,933 5,419 180 2,626 469 564 3,876 5,333 - - - - - - 9,810 - - 22,011 25,981 51,940 840 11,5602 4,4892 51,380 2020 4,593 2019 4,779 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4,593 4,779 78,544 2020 44,880 15,159 959 3,391 2019 42,522 9,980 180 6,672 4,345 5,897 1 2 3 Other members of the Executive Committee in 2020 are: Morten Hultberg Buch greitz, Henriette Fenger Ellekrog, Declan Flanagan, Anders Lindberg, and Martin Neubert. Relates to Thomas Dalsgaard and Ole Kjems Sørensen. Henrik Poulsen lost the right to the 2018, 2019, and 2020 grant upon his resignation, causing prior year costs to be reversed. This has reduced the remuneration by DKK 4.6 million. 9,810 - - 840 11,560 4,489 82,140 104 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents 2.8 Share-based payment Required number of locked-up shares relative to fixed salary CEO 75 % of fixed salary CFO and the other members of the Executive Committee 50 % of fixed salary Senior vice presidents Vice presidents and senior directors 25 % of fixed salary 15 % of fixed salary The figure shows the value of Ørsted shares in percent of the partici- pants’ fixed salary which, at the time of granting, must be locked up for the duration of the executive share programme. Market value of PSUs and key assumptions for valuation in executive share programme Market value of 1 PSU Key assumptions: Share price Average volatility, peers Volatility, Ørsted Risk-free interest rate Time of granting 2020 794 666 24.1 % 24.6 % -0.5 % Time of granting 2019 598 504 22.3 % 20.9 % -0.4 % Time of granting 2018 461 392 24.5 % 19.7 % -0.3 % Expected term at time of granting 3 years 3 years 3 years the grant, this would correspond to 0-30 % or 0-40 % (0-80 % in the US) of the fixed salary on the date of grant. The final number of shares for each participant will be determined on the basis of the total shareholder return delivered by Ørsted, benchmarked against ten comparable European energy companies. The highest rate (200 %) will be triggered if Ørsted’s results, measured as the total return to shareholders, outperform those of the com- parable companies. For each lower ranking, the number of shares granted will fall by 20 percentage points. If, for example, Ørsted ranks third, the participants will be entitled to 160 % of the target. If Ørsted ranks 11 in the comparison, no shares will be granted to the participants. The right to shares is conditional upon continued employment. Executive share programme The Executive Committee and a number of other senior executives participate in the share programme (approx. 100). As a condition for the granting of performance share units (PSUs), the participant must own a number of shares in Ørsted corresponding to a portion of the individual participant’s annual fixed salary. The portion depends on the employee category and, for our CEO, makes up 75 % of the fixed salary; see the table above for more informa- tion. The participants in the programme must invest in Ørsted shares prior to the first granting. If the participants fulfil the shareholding requirement at the time of granting, they will be granted a number of PSUs each year, representing a value of 15-20 % (15-40 % in the US) of the annual fixed salary on the date of granting. The granted PSUs have a vesting period of approximately three years, after which each PSU entitles the holder, without payment, to receive a number of shares corresponding to 0-200 % of the number of PSUs granted. Assuming no share price development since Retention share programme The target group for the share-based reten- tion agreements will typically be employees responsible for vital, long-term projects. The use of these share-based retention agreements will be limited to 25 concurrent agreements with an individual time frame of up to five years. Members of the Executive Board (CEO and CFO) cannot be granted such retention agreements. The number of retention share units (RSUs) to be granted will be determined on the basis of the price of Ørsted’s shares at the time of the grant and will be limited to an amount corresponding to a maximum of six months’ base pay for the employee in question. At vesting, each RSU will entitle the employee to one Ørsted share free of charge. However, the total value of the shares to be received at vesting will be capped at a maximum of twelve months’ base pay for the employee in question. Accounting policies The share programme is classified as an equity-based programme as the programme is settled in shares. The market value of the PSUs/RSUs and the estimated number of PSUs granted are measured at the time of granting and recognised: – in the income statement under employee costs over the vesting period – as an offset in the balance sheet under equity over the vesting period. The valuation of the PSUs/RSUs and the estimate of the number of PSUs/RSUs expected to be granted are carried out as a probability simulation based on Ørsted’s expected total shareholder return relative to ten comparable European energy companies. The expect ations are factored into the market value and are not adjusted subsequently. The participants are compensated for any dividend payments by receiving additional PSUs/RSUs. 105 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 2. Return on capital employed Notes Contents Maximum number of outstanding shares at 31 December, ’000 Time of granting 1 April 2017 1 April 2018 1 April 2019 1 April 2020 Share retention programme Maximum number of outstanding shares at 31 December 2020 Development in maximum number of outstanding shares, ’000 Maximum number of outstanding shares at 1 January Compensation for dividends paid (2018 and 2019 programmes) Exercised (2017 programme) Exercised (2016 programme) Granted (2020 programme) Granted (2019 programme) Cancelled (2020 programme) Cancelled (2019 programme) Cancelled (2018 programme) Cancelled (2017 programme) Share retention program Maximum number of outstanding shares at 31 December (DKKm) Market value of share programme at the time of granting Maximum market value of share programme at 31 December Executive Board Other members of the Execu- tive Committee Senior executives Other employees - 7 5 3 - 15 - 19 16 14 - 49 - 81 69 66 - 216 - - - - 20 20 Executive Board Other members of the Execu- tive Committee Senior executives Other employees 57 - (24) - 9 - (6) (9) (12) - - 15 4 19 49 1 (15) - 14 - - - - - - 49 15 61 281 2 (131) - 66 - - (1) (1) - - 216 65 269 21 - - - - - - - - - (1) 20 5 25 2020 - 107 90 83 20 300 2020 408 3 (170) - 89 - (6) (10) (13) - (1) 300 90 374 2019 2020 in % of share capital Market value of shares at granting DKK million Years until expiry as of 2020 - 25 27 33 5 90 - 0.3 1.3 2.3 - The maximum market value of the share programme at 31 December is based on the assumption that the partici- pants receive the maximum number of shares (i.e. 200 % of the granted PSUs/RSUs). This requires that Ørsted delivers the highest share- holder return, benchmarked against the ten comparable companies. - 0.03 % 0.02 % 0.02 % 0.00 % 0.07 % 2020 in % of share capital 0.10 % 0.00 % (0.05) % - 0.02 % - 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % - 0.00 % 0.07 % 169 117 101 - 21 408 2019 466 9 - (152) - 105 - (4) (11) (8) 3 408 89 280 106 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Notes Contents 3. Capital employed 108 Capital employed 109 Intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment 112 Provisions and contingent assets and liabilities 114 Acquisition of enterprises 115 Divestment of enterprises 115 Gross and net investments 116 116 Assets classified as held for sale Discontinued operations 117 Non-controlling interests Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 3. Capital employed Notes Contents 3. Capital employed Our capital employed primarily relates to production assets, including assets under construction. We monitor investment projects closely, as a large part of our value is created in the development and construction phases. Investments and divestments in 2020 Our gross investments amounted to DKK 27.0 billion in 2020, of which Offshore accounted for 73 %. Investments were primarily related to: – offshore wind farms (DKK 19.5 billion), including Borssele 1 & 2 in the Netherlands, Greater Changhua 1 & 2a in Taiwan, Hornsea 2 in the UK, and Ocean Wind in the US. – onshore wind and solar farms (DKK 6.6 billion), including Permian Energy Center, Muscle Shoals, Western Trail, Sage Draw, Plum Creek, Willow Creek, and Haystack in the US. – Markets & Bioenergy (DKK 0.7 billion), mainly relating to the maintenance of the power distribution grid. Divestments amounted to DKK 19.0 billion and were primarily related to the divestment of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses. The trans- action resulted in proceeds of DKK 20.5 billion. Furthermore, we received minor proceeds regarding the divestment of our 10 MW solar farm Oak Solar in New Jersey and our Inbicon production facilities. This was partly offset Capital employed, DKKm Intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment Equity investments and non-current receivables Net working capital, work in progress Net working capital, tax equity Net working capital, capital expenditures Net working capital, other items Derivatives, net Assets classified as held for sale, net Decommissioning obligations Other provisions Tax, net Other receivables and other payables, net Total capital employed 2020 2019 122,249 106,685 777 9,775 (7,246) (4,040) 2,228 (209) 793 (7,003) (6,860) (771) (21) 1,044 8,756 (4,587) (3,304) 2,540 782 8,211 (6,158) (6,443) (253) (481) 109,672 106,792 109.7 bn Capital employed totalled DKK 109,672 million on 31 December 2020 against DKK 106,792 million in 2019. 27.0 bn Gross investments amounted to DKK 26,967 million in 2020 against DKK 23,305 million in 2019. The increase in capital employed was due to investments partly offset by the divested capital employed regarding our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses. Capital employed by segment, % 2020 Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy 5 % 12 % DKK 109,672 million by a cash outflow in connection with the divestment of the LNG activities of DKK 1.5 billion and compensations paid under our partnership agreements. The most significant assets under construction at the end of 2020 were the offshore wind farms Hornsea 2, Greater Changua 1 & 2a, and Ocean Wind and the onshore wind and solar farms Permian Energy Center, Old 300, Muscle Shoals, Western Trail, and Haystack. 19.0 bn Cash flows from divestments totalled DKK 19,039 million in 2020 against DKK 3,329 million in 2019. 83 % Capital employed by segment is based on capital employed for reportable segments of DKK 108,763 million. 108 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 3. Capital employed Notes Contents 3.1 Intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment Intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment DKKm Intangible assets Land and buildings Production assets Fixtures and fittings, tools, and equipment Property, plant, and equipment under construction Property, plant, and equipment Cost at 1 January 2020 Exchange rate adjustments Additions Divestment of enterprises Disposals Adjustment of decommissioning obligations Reclassified assets Reclassified to assets classified as held for sale Cost at 31 December 2020 Depreciation and amortisation at 1 January 2020 Exchange rate adjustments Depreciation and amortisation Divestment of enterprises Disposals Reclassified to assets classified as held for sale Depreciation and amortisation at 31 December 2020 Impairment losses at 1 January 2020 Exchange rate adjustments Disposals Impairment losses at 31 December 2020 Carrying amount at 31 December 2020 3,979 6,628 116,121 1,453 (6) 245 (54) (1,865) - - (75) 2,224 (2,663) - (41) 54 1,665 44 (941) (644) - - (644) 639 (241) 911 (283) (288) - 527 - 7,254 (1,406) 16 (393) 44 59 - (1,680) (45) 45 - (4,910) 601 - (636) 293 19,514 - 130,983 (38,279) 944 (6,850) - 313 - (43,872) (1,160) 5 228 (927) (20) 164 - (42) - 19 - 1,574 (801) 10 (304) - 28 - (1,067) - - - - 5,574 86,184 507 24,174 (1,436) 26,766 - - 551 (20,060) (8) 29,987 - - - - - - - (672) 30 - (642) 29,345 148,376 (6,607) 28,442 (283) (966) 844 - (8) 169,798 (40,486) 970 (7,547) 44 400 - (46,619) (1,877) 35 273 (1,569) 121,610 Production assets by segment, % 2020 Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy 8 % 17 % DKK 86,184 million 75 % Property, plant, and equipment under construction by segment, % 2020 Offshore Onshore 24 % DKK 29,345 million Intangible assets Intangible assets consist of goodwill of DKK 125 million (2019: DKK 125 million), carbon emission allowances of DKK 324 million (2019: DKK 294 million), other rights of DKK 64 million (2019: DKK 65 million), completed development projects of DKK 79 million (2019: DKK 119 million), and development projects in progress of DKK 47 million (2019: DKK 69 million). 76 % 109 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 3. Capital employed Notes Contents Intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment DKKm Intangible assets Land and buildings Production assets Fixtures and fittings, tools, and equipment Property, plant, and equipment under construction Property, plant, and equipment Cost at 1 January 2019 Lease assets at 1 January 2019 Exchange rate adjustments Addition of acquisition of enterprises Additions Disposals Adjustment of decommissioning obligations Reclassified assets Reclassified to assets classified as held for sale Cost at 31 December 2019 Depreciation and amortisation at 1 January 2019 Exchange rate adjustments Depreciation and amortisation Disposals Reclassified to assets classified as held for sale Depreciation and amortisation at 31 December 2019 Impairment losses at 1 January 2019 Exchange rate adjustments Impairment losses and reversals Impairment losses at 31 December 2019 Carrying amount at 31 December 2019 4,164 - (33) 66 354 (312) - - (260) 3,979 (2,745) 37 (73) - 118 (2,663) (642) (2) - (644) 672 2,082 4,165 147 1 426 (80) - 117 (230) 6,628 (1,074) (1) (423) 14 78 (1,406) (39) (6) - (45) 5,177 98,823 440 3,446 - 1,718 (3) 75 11,671 (49) 116,121 (31,421) (765) (6,121) 10 18 (38,279) (1,092) - (68) (1,160) 76,682 1,185 460 (173) - 82 (22) - 45 (124) 1,453 (843) 184 (247) 17 88 (801) - - - - 16,605 118,695 - 903 85 20,214 (2,044) 255 (11,833) (11) 24,174 - - - - - - (171) (1) (500) (672) 5,065 4,323 86 22,440 (2,149) 330 - (414) 148,376 (33,338) (582) (6,791) 41 184 (40,486) (1,302) (7) (568) (1,877) Production assets by segment, % 2019 Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy 8 % 14 % DKK 76,682 million 78 % Property, plant, and equipment under construction by segment, % 2019 Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy 7 % 652 23,502 106,013 27 % DKK 23,502 million 66 % 110 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 3. Capital employed Notes Contents Impairment losses Impairment losses relating to goodwill We have not impaired goodwill or other intangible assets in 2020. Useful lives Buildings Offshore wind farms Onshore wind farms CGUs in Offshore The cash generating units (CGUs) are made up of individual offshore wind farms, each of which generates cash flows for the segment independently of each other. Significant CGUs Anholt, Borkum Riffgrund 1, Borkum Riffgrund 2, Borssele 1 & 2, Burbo Bank Extension, Gode Wind 1, Gode Wind 2, Greater Changhua 1 & 2a, Horns Rev 2, Hornsea 1, Hornsea 2, London Array, Ocean Wind, Race Bank, Revolution Wind, South Fork, Sunrise Wind, Westermost Rough, Walney, Walney Extension, and West of Duddon Sands. CGUs in Onshore The CGUs are made up of individual onshore wind and solar farms, each of which generates cash flows for the segment independently of each other. Significant CGUs Amazon, Haystack, Lockett, Muscle Shoals, Permian Energy Center, Plum Creek, Sage Draw, Tahoka, Western Trail, Willow Creek, and Willow Springs. CGUs in Markets & Bioenergy The Danish power plants constitute a single CGU, as overall production planning is for the entire Danish portfolio of CHP plants. In addition, the Renescience plant in Northwich in the UK is deemed to constitute an independent CGU. The infrastructure assets, each of which generates cash flows for the segment independently of each other, also constitute CGUs. Significant CGUs Central CHP plants (including goodwill), Renescience Northwich, and the offshore gas pipelines. Impairment losses relating to property, plant, and equipment We have not impaired any property, plant, and equipment in 2020. In 2019, property, plant, and equipment under construction related to the Renescience facility which was impaired by DKK 500 million. Renescience is part of our Markets & Bioenergy segment. The impairment losses in 2019 related to Renescience were primarily due to delays in commissioning, increases in CAPEX as we were optimising the waste conversion technology, and changes in cost and price estimates. The recoverable amount of Renescience was measured on the basis of its value in use and was based on internal budgets and forecasts. Significant assumptions in the forecasts included the facility capacity, the waste conversation ratios, and potential revenue streams from increased recycling. The estimated cash flows were discounted with a pre-tax rate of 7.5 %. In 2019, production assets related to the battery storage project Carnegie Road were fully impaired by DKK 68 million. Production assets, power (thermal) and district heating Gas transportation system (marine pipelines) Fixtures and fittings, tools, and equipment 20-50 years 20-30 years 24-30 years 20-25 years 20-40 years 3-10 years Key accounting estimates Key assumptions for value in use CGUs are tested for impairment if there is any indica- tion of impairment. In performing an impairment test, we assess whether the recoverable amount exceeds the net book value of a CGU. When performing value-in-use tests, we see if the CGU will be able to generate positive net cash flows sufficient to support the net book values. Value-in-use calculations are based on expected future cash flows from financial budgets and forecasts and include a number of assumptions and estimates. These assumptions include future market conditions, market prices of power and biofuel, estimated discount rates, estimated useful lives of the projects, etc. The market prices applied are based on available forward prices for a period of up to five years and our best estimate of long-term prices for the remainder of the period. When calculating the recoverable amount of property, plant, and equipment under construction, other material assumptions include the expected completion costs and the commissioning dates. Accounting policies Intangible assets Rights are measured at cost less accumulated amort isation and impairment losses. Rights are amortised on a straight-line basis over their estimated future useful lives, which are 5-20 years. Property, plant, and equipment Property, plant, and equipment which is not a lease is measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Cost of property, plant, and equipment is depreciated by using the straight-line method, the diminishing-balance method, or the reducing -fraction method. The diminishing-balance method and the reducing-fraction method result in decreasing depreci ation over the useful life. These methods are used for some of our offshore wind farms. Cost comprises purchase price and any costs directly attributable to the acquisition until the date the asset is available for use. The cost of self-construct- ed assets comprises direct and indirect costs of materials, components, sub-suppliers, and labour. Borrowing costs relating to both specific and general borrowing directly attributable to assets under construction with a lengthy construction period are recognised in cost during the construction period. Cost is increased by the present value of the estimat- ed obligations for demolition and decommissioning of assets to the extent that the obligations are recognised as a provision. Subsequent costs, for example in connection with replacement of parts of an item of property, plant, and equipment, are recognised in the carrying amount of the asset in question when it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Group from the expenses incurred. Any residual value of the replaced parts is recognised in the income statement as loss on disposal of non-current assets. Other repair and maintenance expenses are recog- nised in profit (loss) for the year as incurred. 111 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 3. Capital employed Notes Contents 3.2 Provisions and contingent assets and liabilities Decommissioning obligations Decommissioning obligations mainly comprise estimated expenses relating to decommissioning and disposal of our offshore wind, onshore wind, and solar farms, restoration of seabeds, and the decommissioning of our CHP plants. As developers of offshore wind, onshore wind, and solar farms, we are obliged to decommission our wind and solar farms and restore the surroundings at our own expense. When we construct offshore wind farms in cooperation with partners, they are liable for their share of the decom- missioning costs. Therefore, we have only included the decommissioning obligations associated with our ownership interest in the offshore wind farms. Decommissioning obligations increased by DKK 845 million from 2019 to 2020, primarily due to the construction of new wind farms. Onerous contracts Onerous contracts comprise primarily: – two contracts for gas storage capacity in Germany amounting to DKK 699 million (2019: DKK 814 million) Provisions, DKKm Provisions at 1 January Change in accounting policy Exchange rate adjustments Used during the year Provisions reversed during the year Provisions made during the year Change in estimates Transferred to assets and liabilities classified as held for sale Interest element of provisions Total provisions Falling due as follows: 0-1 year 1-5 years After 5 years Other provisions Other provisions comprise primarily: – offshore partnership provisions, including warranty obligations, wake-effect obliga- tions and provisions related to offshore transmission assets – obligations in relation to the divestment of our Oil & Gas business in 2017 – a contract for gas storage capacity in – obligations in respect of our own carbon Denmark amounting to DKK 96 million (2019: DKK 164 million) emissions – provisions for revisions of prices related to supply contracts – other contractual obligations. 2020 2019 Decom- missioning obligations Onerous contracts Other provisions Total Decom- missioning obligations Onerous contracts Other provisions Total 6,158 - (216) (6) - 933 (93) (11) 238 7,003 - 546 6,457 978 5,465 12,601 5,472 - 3 (215) - 153 - (69) 100 950 182 486 282 - 83 (640) (213) 1,215 - - - - (130) (861) (213) 2,301 (93) (80) 338 - 160 (3) - 421 (93) (11) 212 5,910 13,863 6,158 1,206 3,052 1,652 1,388 4,084 8,391 - 213 5,945 2,418 (25) - (380) - 1,165 - (2,277) 77 978 184 537 257 Decommissioning obligations by segment, DKKm Offshore Onshore 0-5 years 5-10 years 10-20 years After 20 years 2020 2019 476 821 1,640 2,132 5,069 4,562 - - - 659 659 306 5,564 13,454 - 29 (636) (596) 1,104 - - - (25) 189 (1,019) (596) 2,690 (93) (2,288) 289 5,465 12,601 353 4,279 833 Markets & Bioenergy 70 46 237 922 1,275 1,290 537 5,029 7,035 Total 546 867 1,877 3,713 7,003 6,158 112 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 3. Capital employed Notes Contents Contingent liabilities Liability to pay compensation In case of any environmental accidents or other types of damage caused by our gas and oil transport, the companies Ørsted Salg & Service A/S and Danish Oil Pipe A/S are liable to pay compensation according to legisla- tion. This also applies if there is no proof of negligence (strict liability). We have taken out insurance to cover any such claims. Secondary liability As part of the divestment of our Oil & Gas business in 2017, we assumed a secondary liability regarding the decommissioning of offshore installations. Litigation We are party to a number of court cases and legal disputes. In our assessment, none of these will significantly impact Ørsted’s financial position, neither individually nor collectively. We have been party to actions relating to the Danish competition authorities’ claim that the former Elsam A/S and Elsam Kraft A/S (‘Elsam’), now part of Ørsted, charged excessive prices in the Danish wholesale power market in the period 1 July 2003 to 31 December 2006. There are no longer any outstanding cases with the competition authorities claiming Elsam infringed competition law, but in connection with the former cases, some energy trading companies, some of their customers, and others have filed claims for damages which are still pending. The biggest claim was filed in 2007 before the Copenhagen Maritime & Commercial Court, amounting to approx. DKK 4.4 billion with addition of litigation interest. In a ruling from March 2020, Elsam was acquitted from the claim, but the plaintiffs have appealed the ruling, and it is now pending before the High Court of Western Denmark. Ørsted is involved in ongoing transfer pricing disputes. For further information, we refer to section 5.1 ‘Approach to taxes’. Change of control Some of our activities are subject to con- sents, permits, and licences granted by public authorities. We may be faced with a claim for acceptance of any transfer, possibly with additional terms and conditions, if the Danish State holds less than 50 % of the share capital or voting rights in Ørsted A/S. Read more in note 6.1 ‘Interest-bearing debt’. Monitoring and coordinating all service vessels and helicopters in the North Sea, at the East Coast Hub, at the Port of Grimsby, Lincolnshire, the UK. Key accounting estimates Assumptions for provisions We continually assess our provisions recognised to cover contractual obligations and claims raised against Ørsted. Timing, probabilities, amounts, etc., which have a bearing on our provisions’ estimates are updated quarterly based on our expectations. Estimates of provisions are based on our expectations of, for example: – timing and scope of obligation – future cost level – legal assessment. If deemed material, non-current provisions are discounted using either the structural risk-free interest rate or the incremental borrowing rate. The structural risk-free interest rate is used for decommissioning liabilities and onerous contracts. The outcome of our contractual obligations and claims may depend on future events which are uncertain by nature. Accounting policies Provisions are recognised when the following criteria are fulfilled: – We have a legal or constructive obligation as a result of an earlier event. – The settlement of the obligation is expected to result in an outflow of resources. – The obligation can be measured reliably. Decommissioning obligations are measured at the present value of the future liability in respect of decommissioning as expected at the balance sheet date. The present value of the provision and changes in estimate are recognised as part of the cost of prop erty, plant, and equipment and depreciated together with the associated asset. The addition of interest on provisions is recognised in the income statement under financial expenses. For onerous contracts, a provision is made when the expected income to be derived from a contract is lower than the unavoidable cost of meeting our obligations under the contract. Provisions concerning carbon emissions are recognised when our actual emissions exceed our holding of carbon emission allowances. 113 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 3. Capital employed Notes Contents 3.3 Acquisition of enterprises We have not acquired any enterprises in 2020. In 2019, we have paid contingent consider- ations of DKK 616 million in total related to the acquisition of Deepwater Wind in 2018. We also paid DKK 148 million for the acquis- tion of Coronal Energy’s development business (Onshore) and recognised a contingent payment of DKK 50 million. Cash flows used for acquisitions, DKKm 2020 2019 Fair value at time of acquisition: Property, plant, and equipment Other assets Other liabilities Net assets acquired Goodwill Purchase price Cash, available and acquired Contingent consideration – Coronal Energy Contingent consideration – Deepwater Wind Cash flow used for acquisition of enterprises Purchase price Enterprise value Accounting policies - - - - - - - - - - - - 86 115 (3) 198 - 198 - (50) 616 764 764 764 Acquisition of enterprises are recognised using the acquisition method whereby assets and liabilities as well as contingent liabilities of the acquired enterprise are measured at fair value on the date of acquisition. The fair values of other assets and liabilities are valued using the approach we find most relevant for the individual item, which can be either a market approach, an income approach, or a cost approach. The fair value of production assets and assets under construction are normally determined using an income approach where they are valued at present value based on the expected cash flows they can generate, including any non-separable power purchase agree- ments, and on income, such as production tax credits. The fair value of derivatives is determined using our normal approach for such items which is based on market prices or expectations for prices over the term of the derivatives. An acquired enterprise is included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition, which is the date when we obtain control. When an acquired enterprise has entered into a power purchase agreement classified as a derivative, the fair value of the agreement will be included in the opening balance. Post-acquisition, this fair value is recognised as an adjustment to revenue over the duration of the contract, based on the fair value calculation at the time of the acquisition. Walney Extension, off the coast of Cumbria, the UK. 114 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 3. Capital employed Notes Contents 3.4 Divestment of enterprises 3.5 Gross and net investments Selling price, DKKm Payment Reduction for payable tax and other receivables/payables transferred Working capital adjustment Selling price on divestment of enterprises Transaction costs Of which, selling price payable Cash selling price on divestment of enterprises Payments related to provisions for divestments in previous years Total cash flows from divestment of enterprises 2019 Gross and net investments, DKKm - - - - Cash flows from investing activities Dividends received and capital reductions reversed Purchase and sale of securities, reversed Loans to associates and joint ventures, reversed (63) Sale of non-current assets, reversed Gross investments Transactions with non-controlling interests in connection with divestments Sale of non-current assets Divestments Net investments 2020 2019 (16,562) (10,997) (18) 8,650 - (19,037) (26,967) 2 19,037 19,039 (7,928) (21) (8,949) (3) (3,335) (23,305) (6) 3,335 3,329 (19,976) Gain (loss) on divestment of enterprises, DKKm Selling price on divestment of enterprises Net assets sold Provisions as a result of the transactions Transaction costs Gain (loss) on divestment of enterprises In 2020, we divested our Danish power distribution, residental customer, and city light businesses to SEAS-NVE (now Andel). The gain on the divestment was DKK 10,900 million, and the total cash flows amounted to DKK 20,447 million. Transferred cash and cash equivalents totalled DKK 1,513 million. Further, we divested our loss-making LNG business to Glencore. The loss on the divest- ment was DKK 42 million, and the cash flow was DKK -1,499 million (payment from Ørsted). No cash was transferred. Gross investments totalled DKK 26,967 million in 2020, which was 16 % more than in 2019. Gross investments in Offshore amounted to DKK 19,525 million and were primarily related to the construction of Borssele 1 & 2 in the Netherlands, Greater Changhua 1 & 2a in Taiwan, Hornsea 2 in the UK, and Ocean Wind in the US. Accounting policies We recognise income from divested enterprises in the income statement up until the date of divestment. The date of divestment is the date on which we relinquish control of the divested enterprise. Gains or losses on the divestment or discontinuation of subsidiaries and associates are determined as the difference between the selling price and the carrying amount of the net assets divested. In Onshore, gross investments amounted to DKK 6,633 million and were primarily related to the construction of Permian Energy Center, Muscle Shoals, Western Trail, Sage Draw, Plum Creek, Willow Creek, and Haystack in the US. Moreover, we deduct any provisions made for obli- gations related to sales and purchase agreements and the fees of advisers, etc., in connection with the divestment or discontinuation of the enterprise. In 2019, gross investments of DKK 15,121 million in Offshore related to the construction of Hornsea 1 and 2, Borssele 1 & 2, and Changhua 1 & 2a. Gross investments of DKK 6,158 million in Onshore related to the construction of Sage Draw, Plum Creek, Lockett, Willow Creek, and Permian Energy Center. Divestments totalled DKK 19,039 million in 2020 and related to the divestment of our Danish power distribution, residental customer, and city light businesses as well as our LNG business. In 2019, divestments primarily related to the divestment of 50 % of certain Deepwater Wind assets and the receipt of deferred pro- ceeds from the 50 % farm-down of Hornsea 1 in 2018. 115 / 193 2020 19,692 (535) (307) 18,850 (101) 165 18,914 - 18,914 2020 18,850 (7,569) (349) (101) 10,831 - (63) (26) (89) 2019 - - - (63) (63) Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 3. Capital employed Notes Contents 3.6 Assets classified as held for sale 3.7 Discontinued operations Assets classified as held for sale, DKKm Intangible assets Property, plant, and equipment Deferred tax Inventories Trade receivables Other receivables Income tax Total assets classified as held for sale Deferred tax Provisions Contract liabilities Trade payables Other payables Income tax Total liabilities relating to assets classified as held for sale Net assets classified as held for sale 2020 - 287 - - 43 1,111 23 1,464 178 396 - 49 61 3 687 777 2019 Profit from discontinued operations, DKKm 2020 2019 226 13,243 589 43 736 2,113 2 16,952 1,315 2,662 3,107 333 970 445 8,832 8,120 Operating profit (loss) (EBIT) Gain (loss) on divestment of enterprises Financial income and expenses, net Profit (loss) before tax Tax on profit (loss) for the year Profit from discontinued operations Cash flows, DKKm Cash flows from operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Total cash flows - 45 (72) (27) 16 (11) 2020 (76) 1,042 - 966 (7) (43) (8) (58) 2 (56) 2019 (211) 385 - 174 At 31 December 2020, assets and related liabilities held for sale comprised our oil pipe system in Denmark which is an activity in Markets & Bioenergy. Assets classified as held for sale at 31 December 2019 comprised our Danish power distribution, residental customer, and city light businesses, our oil pipe system in Denmark, and our LNG business. The power distribution, residental customer, and city light businesses as well as the LNG business were all divested in 2020. See note 3.4. Accounting policies Assets classified as held for sale comprise assets and liabilities, the values of which are highly probable to be recovered through a sale within 12 months rather than through continued use. Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale are measured at the carrying amount at the time of classification as ‘held for sale’ or at market value less selling costs, whichever is lower. The carrying amount is measured in accordance with the Group’s accounting policies. No depreciation or amortisation is effected on intangible assets, and prop er ty, plant, and equip- ment from the time of classification as ‘held for sale’. When we divest an offshore wind farm, the retaining interest typically represents a joint operation. Since we retain a direct interest in the underlying assets and liabilities after the disposal, the assets and liabilities disposed off are not classified as held for sale. Discontinued operations related to our Oil & Gas business which was sold to INEOS in 2017. As the remaining selling price was received in 2020, we ended the reporting on discontinued operations per 31 December 2020. Provisions regarding tax indemnifications and payments related to the Fredericia stabilisation plant (DKK 705 million) were transferred to continuing operations at 31 December 2020. Financial results Profit (loss) in 2020 amounted to DKK -11 million (2019: DKK -56 million). Total cash flows in 2020 amounted to DKK 966 million (2019: DKK 174 million), of which DKK -76 million were from operating activities and primarily concerned payments related to the Fredericia stabilisation plant. Cash flows from investing activities amounted to DKK 1,042 million and primarily comprised the receipt of the remaining selling price receivables of DKK 1,001 million in total. DKK 342 million hereof was interest-bearing. 116 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 3. Capital employed Notes Contents 3.8 Non-controlling interests Transactions with non-controlling interests, DKKm 2020 2019 Transactions with non-controlling interests Dividends paid to non-controlling interests Divestment of equity investments to non-controlling interests Other capital transactions with non-controlling interests Total transactions, see statement of cash flows Divestment of equity investments to non-controlling interests Changes in receivables relating to the acquisition and divestment of non-controlling interests Cash selling price, total (361) (73) 6 (428) (73) (73) (388) (74) - (462) (74) (74) Subsidiaries with significant non-controlling interests Gunfleet Sands Holding Ltd. Non-controlling interest Registered office 49.9 % London, UK Walney (UK) Offshore Windfarms Ltd. 49.9 % London, UK DKKm Statement of comprehensive income Revenue EBITDA Profit (loss) for the year Total comprehensive income Profit (loss) for the year attributable to non-controlling interests Balance sheet Non-current assets Current assets Non-current liabilities Current liabilities Carrying amount of non-controlling interests Statement of cash flows Cash flows from operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Cash flows from financing activities – of which, dividends paid to non-controlling interests Gunfleet Sands Holding Ltd. group Walney (UK) Offshore Windfarms Ltd. 2020 2019 2020 2019 Accounting policies In the table, we provide financial information for subsidiaries with signifi- cant non-controlling interests. The amounts stated are the con- solidated accounting figures of the individual enterprises or groups, determined according to our accounting policies. Amounts are stated before intra-group eliminations. Transactions with non-controlling interests are accounted for as transactions with the shareholder base. Gains and losses on the divestment of equity invest- ments to non-controlling interests are recognised in equity when the divestment does not result in a loss of control. Net assets acquired are not revalued on the acquisi- tion of non-controlling interests. Any difference between the carrying amount and the acquisition or selling price is recognised in equity. 444 247 15 (90) 7 448 275 60 168 30 1,151 590 54 (216) 27 1,170 616 104 384 52 1,795 2,121 4,883 5,681 174 406 68 746 241 - (241) (119) 187 423 62 910 293 - (241) (119) 211 920 286 247 982 303 1,960 2,330 553 1 (548) (242) 647 (13) (600) (268) 117 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Notes Contents 4. Working capital 119 Working capital 120 Inventories 120 Contract assets and liabilities 121 Trade receivables 121 Other receivables 122 Tax equity liabilities 123 Other payables 123 Changes in net working capital Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 4. Working capital Notes Contents 4. Working capital Our key working capital items consist of inventories, net contract assets, trade receivables and payables, and tax equity liabilities. Working capital items vary with the seasonal variations in our generation and sales activities during the year. Our net contract assets primarily relate to prepayments from heat customers in connec- tion with bioconversions and construction of offshore wind farms for partners. The net contract assets vary within and across years, depending on the portfolio of offshore construction assets, and when we reach certain milestones and trigger pay- ments from our partners. Working capital, DKKm Inventories Contract assets, net Trade receivables Other receivables Construction of offshore transmission assets in the UK, which are recognised as inventories, will continue to tie up cash until they are divested. Tax equity liabilities also vary within and across years. This is due to the fact that we receive cash contributions from tax equity partners at the point in time when a US wind farm enters into operation. Trade payables relating to capital investments are not included in this section, as they are presented as part of the cash flows from investing activities. Working capital, DKKm 2020 Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Other -7,407 -895 32 0 4.8 bn Our net working capital, excluding trade payables relating to capital expenditure, amounted to DKK 4,757 million in 2020 against DKK 6,709 million in 2019. 13,027 Offshore primarily has funds tied up in inventories, construction agreements, and trade receivables. The most significant working capital item in Onshore consists of liabilities regarding tax equity contributions from our partners. Markets & Bioenergy also has a net negative working capital due to prepayments from heat customers which are only partly countered by inventories and receivables. ‘Work in progress and related trade payables’ consists of inventories related to transmission assets, construction agreements, and construction manage- ment agreements in connection with the construc- tion of transmission assets and offshore wind farms for partners as well as related trade payables. 2020 14,739 (4,100) 6,732 3,298 (5,701) (7,246) (2,965) 4,757 9,775 2019 14,031 (3,807) 8,140 3,253 (7,529) (4,587) (2,793) 6,709 8,756 -2.0 bn We reduced funds tied up in working capital by DKK 1,952 million relative to 2019, of which DKK -1,019 million pertained to work in progress and related trade payables in Offshore. 119 / 193 Trade payables, excluding trade payables relating to capital expenditure Tax equity liabilities Other payables Net working capital, excluding trade payables relating to capital expenditure at 31 December Of which, work in progress and related trade payables Of which, tax equity partner liabilities and other working capital (5,018) (2,047) Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 4. Working capital Notes Contents 4.1 Inventories Inventories, DKKm Offshore transmission assets 2020 2019 10,669 10,114 Biomass Gas Coal Oil Green certificates Carbon emission allowances (purchased) Other inventories Total inventories Inventories recognised as an expense in ‘Cost of sales’ during the year 446 1,287 242 96 1,546 449 4 445 1,057 242 106 1,717 345 5 14,739 14,031 10,616 16,871 4.2 Contract assets and liabilities Inventories measured at fair value are disclosed in note 7.7 ‘Fair value measurement’. Revenue from contracts with customers, DKKm Revenue recognised included in contract liabilities at the beginning of the year Revenue recognised from perfomance obligations satisfied in previous years Contract balances, DKKm Contract assets Current contract assets Total contract assets Contract liabilities Non-current contract liabilities Current contract liabilities Total contract liabilities 2020 654 104 2019 771 128 2020 2019 30 30 3,650 480 4,130 739 739 3,762 784 4,546 We use biomass, coal, gas, and, to a limited extent, oil as fuel at our CHP plants. Green certificates are primarily renewable obligation certificates (ROCs) which are issued to power generators sourcing from renewable energy sources in the UK. Gas at storage primarily relates to our gas trade activities. Accounting policies Offshore transmission assets are measured at cost. The costs comprise costs of materials used in construction, site labour costs, costs of renting equipment as well as indirect production costs, such as employee costs. Gas storage in non-Danish facilities are managed on a fair value basis, and therefore the gas in these storage facilities is recognised at fair value less costs to sell. Changes in the fair value less costs to sell are recognised in cost of sales in the period of the change. Gas in Danish storage facilities are recognised at cost, determined as a weighted average of the previous months purchase price, including transportation costs. Purchased carbon emission allowances are measured at market value. Green certificates, which we earn by generating power using renewable energy sources, are recog- nised in inventories in step with our generation. We measure green certificates (earned and bought) at cost using the first in, first out (FIFO) principle. Other inventories are measured at cost, determined on a first in, first out basis or net realisable value, if net realisable value is lower. Inventories are written down to the lower of net realisable value and cost price. For offshore trans- mission assets, it is the expected final transfer value announced by Ofgem. The net realisable value is the sum (discounted) which the inventories are expected to generate through a normal sale. Contract assets and contract liabilities are primarily related to: – the construction of offshore wind farms with partners, with each party usually owning 50 % of the offshore wind farm – prepayments from heat customers. The table shows the amount of our revenue relating to contract liabilities carried forward (as prepayments and deferred revenue) and the amount relating to performance obligations satisfied in a prior year (e.g. renegotiations or constraints on variable consider- ations that are not recognised until they are highly probable). At the end of 2020, contract assets relates to the Coastal Virginia Wind project in the US. At the end of 2019, contract assets and liabilities regarding construction agreements relates to our partners’ share of the offshore wind farm Hornsea 1 and the Coastal Virginia Wind project in the US. Non-current contract liabilities primarily relate to prepayments from heat customers. Accounting policies We recognise a contract asset when we perform a service or transfer goods in advance of receiving consideration, and the consideration is conditional. When the consideration is unconditional, and the goods or services are delivered, we recognise a receiv- able. A right to consideration is unconditional if only the passage of time is required before the payment is due. Contract assets are measured at the transac- tion price of the good or services which we have performed less invoicing on account. We recognise a contract liability when the invoicing on account and expected losses exceed the transaction price of the goods or services transferred to our customer. 120 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 4. Working capital Notes Contents 4.3 Trade receivables 4.4 Other receivables Trade receivables, DKKm Trade receivables, not due Trade receivables, 1-30 days overdue Trade receivables, more than 30 days overdue Trade receivables, write-down Total trade receivables We continuously perform credit ratings of our customers, as described in note 7.5 ‘Credit risks’. For customers with a general credit risk, a write-down of 0-1 % is carried out on initial recognition. In 2020, write-downs of receivables and losses for the year were DKK 185 million (2019: DKK 33 million). 2020 6,548 238 110 (164) 6,732 445 416 (74) 8,140 2019 Other receivables, DKKm 7,353 Receivables from the divestment of assets and enterprises Receivables from the divestment of equity investments to non-controlling interests VAT and other indirect tax receivables Collateral provided Deposits Prepayments Other account receivables Other receivables Of which, working capital Of which, other capital employed Of which, interest-bearing net debt 2020 1,254 742 725 498 312 556 1,558 5,645 3,298 1,593 754 2019 1,456 717 574 1,940 411 556 1,312 6,966 3,253 1,216 2,497 Accounting policies We keep our receivables until maturity, and therefore, they are measured at amortised cost. Write-downs are carried out from initial recognition of our receivables. The write-down is calculated as the difference between the carrying amount of the receivable and the net present value of expected future cash flows from the receivable. The discount rate used is the effective interest rate for the individual receivable or the individual portfolio. We apply the simplified approach to the write-down of trade receivables, which permits calculating the write-down as the full loss during the entire term of the receivable. In 2020, ‘Receivables from divestment of assets and enterprises’ primarily concerned the Hornsea 1 transmission asset. The collateral provided by the Group is receivables from banks in connection with trading of derivatives. In 2019, ‘Receivables from the divestment of assets and enterprises’ primarily related to the divestment of our Oil & Gas business. The short-term portion of other receiv- ables amounted to DKK 3,720 million (2019: DKK 5,253 million). ‘Receivables from the divestment of equity investments to non-controlling interests’ primarily relate to the divestment in 2011 of our ownership interests in Gunfleet Sands. 121 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 4. Working capital Notes Contents 4.5 Tax equity liabilities Tax equity liabilities, DKKm Balance at 1 January Contribution received from tax equity partners Tax attributes and PTCs recognised in other operating income Cash paid to tax equity partners Tax equity partners’ contractual return Exchange rate adjustments Balance at 31 December Of which, working capital Of which, interest-bearing debt 2020 5,195 4,091 (956) (75) 486 (774) 7,967 7,246 721 2019 4,173 1,306 (622) (73) 327 84 5,195 4,587 608 As at 31 December 2020, we have seven onshore wind farms and one offshore wind farm in operation for which we have received tax equity contributions. In the US, we have several wind farms with tax equity partners. During 2020, we commis- sioned the onshore wind farms Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek and received tax equity contributions from our partner. In 2019, we commissioned the onshore wind farm Lockett with a tax equity partner. Description of tax equity partnerships Tax equity partnerships are characterised by a tax equity partner who contributes an upfront payment as part of the initial project investment and does not have an operational role in the project. The partner receives a contractually agreed return on the contribu- tion. In order to ‘repay’ the initial contribution and the return, a disproportionate share of the production tax credits (PTCs) and other tax attributes (accelerated tax depreciation and other taxable results) are allocated to the partner during the first part of the project’s lifetime. The partner also receives some cash payment-based percentages specified in the partnership agreements. Once the partner receives the agreed return, the agreement flips, and the partner is typically entitled to a minor part of the cash distributions from the project, unless we repurchase this right from them, which is highly likely. Accounting policies When a tax equity partnership is formed, we evalu- ate if the company should still be fully consolidated based on our right to variable returns as well as our ability to exercise influence on financial and opera- tional decisions impacting those returns. Due to the operational and financial nature of the projects and the influence normally given to tax equity partners in such agreements, we normally have the influ- ence to fully consolidate companies that have tax equity partners. The terms of the tax equity partner’s contribution are evaluated to determine the accounting treatment. The contribution generally has the characteristics of a liability as the initial contribution is repaid, including an agreed return, and the partner does not share in the risks of the project in the same way as a shareholder. As such, the contribution is accounted for as a liability and measured at amortised cost. The liability is based on the expected method of repayment and is divided into: – a net working-capital element to be repaid through PTCs and other tax attributes – an interest-bearing debt element expected to be repaid through cash distributions. The partner’s agreed return is expensed as a financial expense and is recognised as an increase of the tax equity liability. PTCs and other tax attributes trans- ferred to the tax equity partner are recognised as other operating income. Tax attributes allocated to the tax equity partner are deferred and recognised on a straight-line basis over the estimated contrac- tual length of the partnership structure, while PTCs are recognised in the periods earned, similar to recognition of our own PTCs. In addition to the above, we recognise a liability for the expected purchase price for the partner’s post- flip rights to cash distributions. This liability is recog- nised at fair value, and adjustments are expensed as a financial item. This recognition reflects the intention and high likelihood that we will purchase the partner’s post-flip rights, and they are part of the financial costs of the arrangement. If we choose not to buy the partner’s post-flip rights, the tax equity partner will be entitled to part of the company’s returns in the post-flip period. At that point, the partner will share in the risks and rewards in the company as a shareholder and will be consid- ered a non-controlling interest. 122 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 4. Working capital Notes Contents 4.6 Other payables Other payables, DKKm Carbon rights VAT and other indirect taxes payable Salary-related items payable Accrued interest Collateral received Purchase price, acquisition of enterprises Other Total other payables Of which, working capital Of which, other capital employed Of which, interest-bearing net debt The collateral received by the Group is cash received from banks in connection with trading of derivatives. In 2020, the short-term portion of other payables amounted to DKK 6,082 million (2019: DKK 4,247 million). 4.7 Changes in net working capital 2020 2019 Change in net working capital, DKKm 43 359 867 1,527 1,862 48 1,750 6,456 2,965 1,601 1,890 90 686 793 Change in inventories Change in contract assets and liabilities Change in trade receivables 1,239 Change in other receivables 205 116 Change in trade payables Change in tax equity liabilities 1,587 Change in other payables Total change in net working capital Of which, changes relating to work in progress 4,716 2,793 1,367 556 2020 (1,464) 229 1,265 897 2019 529 612 2,846 (250) (1,795) (2,371) 2,958 408 2,498 (1,613) 630 (427) 1,569 1,416 Work in progress consists of elements in contract assets and liabilities, construc- tion manage ment agreements related to construction of offshore wind farms, construction of offshore transmission assets (inventories), and related trade payables. Of which, changes relating to tax equity liabilities and other working capital 4,111 153 The change in funds tied up in work in pro- gress and related trade payables was a cash outflow of DKK -1,613 million in 2020 due to supplier payments related to the construction of offshore wind farms for partners (Hornsea 1) as well as offshore transmission assets in the UK (Hornsea 2), partly offset by the divestment of the offshore transmission asset at Walney Extension. In 2019, the change in funds tied up in work in progress was DKK 1,416 million due to high activitiy related to the construction of offshore wind farms for partners (Hornsea 1) as well as offshore transmission assets in the UK (mainly Hornsea 2), which was partly offset by the receipt of milestone payments from partners and the divestment of the Race Bank transmission asset. The change in tax equity liabilities in 2020 were due to contributions from our tax equity partners in the onshore wind farms Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek. 123 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Notes Contents 5. Tax 125 Tax 126 Approach to taxes 128 Tax on profit (loss) for the year 130 Deferred tax 132 Our tax footprint Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 5. Tax Notes Contents 5. Tax Tax on profit (loss) for the year The effective tax rate was 11 % for our continuing operations and was primarily affected by the largely tax-exempt divestment of the Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses as well as recognition of tax liabilities in connection with tax equity partnerships related to the onshore wind farms Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek. Corporate income taxes paid We have paid DKK 1,118 million in taxes in 2020, of which DKK 412 million related to residual tax for 2019, as we had a higher portion of income related to financial instruments in 2019 than we expected at the time we paid taxes on account for 2019. We expect to have a residual tax of DKK 109 million regarding 2020, primarily due to movements in financial instruments in the last quarter of 2020. Corporate income tax paid by segment, 2020, DKKm Development in current and deferred tax asset and liabilities (tax, net), 2020, DKKm Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Ørsted A/S and other activities Tax, net liability Tax on profit (loss) for the year Tax on other comprehensive income Corporate taxes paid Other effects 2,123 -777 1,424 -1,118 -782 -1 0 477 253 2019 290 771 2020 Business performance 2020, DKKm Profit (loss) before tax New tax equity, deferred tax liability Gain (loss) on divestment of enterprises ‘Other adjustments’ include changes in tax rates, movements in uncertain tax positions, tax concerning previous years, and other non-taxable income and non-deductible costs. Other adjustments Remaining Ørsted business Effective tax for the year - 10,831 - 8,019 18,850 Tax (1,070) - 694 (1,747) (2,123) Tax in % n.a. 0 % n.a. 22 % 11 % 1.1 bn Corporate income tax paid by the Group in 2020 totalled DKK 1,118 million against DKK 4,800 million in 2019. 2.7 bn Current corporate income tax in 2020 totalled DKK 2,735 million against DKK 5,605 million in 2019. 125 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 5. Tax Notes Contents 5.1 Approach to taxes In Ørsted, we wish to provide user-friendly information about our tax positions. By drawing inspiration from the standard GRI 207: Tax, we have increased the transparency of our reporting in a standardised manner. We believe that taxes are a core part of our corporate social responsibility. At Ørsted, we are committed to conducting our business in a way that contributes to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Taxes are a key contribution to the SDGs, in particular target 16.6 on the development of effective, account- able, and transparent institutions. Taxes are overseen by the Board of Directors who is accountable for the tax policy. The responsibility for tax risk management lies with the CFO and is overseen by the Audit & Risk Committee. The day-to-day tax manage- ment is handled by a centralised global tax team who is involved in all significant business developments. We have a clear responsibility to comply with the laws in the countries where we operate. We choose to do this by aiming to comply not only with the letter of the law, but also with the underlying tax policy intent. Amazon Wind Farm, Scurry County, Texas, the US. In December 2019, the GRI 207: Tax standard was adopted with effect for reports published after 1 January 2021. We have drawn inspira- tion from the standard when presenting our approach to and reporting of tax. in the corporate tax system. As an example, feedback received in the Tax Dialogue project aided our decision to update our 2020 tax reporting by drawing inspiration from the GRI 207: Tax standard. Management has been provided with a state- ment (ISRS 4400 - Agreed Upon Procedures) from our auditors on our application of GRI 207: Tax. Tax stakeholder engagement In line with our tax policy, we engage construc- tively in national and international dialogue with governments, business groups, and civil society to support the development of effec- tive tax systems, legislation, and administration. During 2020, our engagement consisted mainly of the following: Participation in a public hearing in the Danish Parliament on CFC taxation, participation in the Tax Dialogue Project, meetings with NGOs, submission of responses to OECD’s public consultations on CbC Reporting, Pillar I, and Pillar II, participa- tion in the tax panel meetings of the Danish Confederation of Enterprises, and participa- tion in BIAC’s workgroup on OECD’s Pillar II. The purpose of our engagement is to support the development of robust and sustainable tax legislation and practice by contributing to an informed discussion. By engaging with civil society and gathering input on, for example, how we share information, we believe we can contribute to rebuilding the public’s confidence Tax risk management and controls Complying with tax rules can be complex as the interpretation of legislation and case law may not always be clear cut and may change over time, giving rise to tax risks. We manage our tax risks by the prevention of unnecessary disputes, which we strive to achieve through strong technical positions, clear explanations of our positions, thorough documentation, and strong compliance procedures. We define a tax risk as any consequence relat- ing to: the application of our tax policy, day- to-day operations, compliance, or external reporting that impacts the business in form of cash liabilities, financial statement errors or misstatements, or reputational damage. To ensure a coordinated assessment of tax risks, Ørsted’s tax function is involved in the planning and implementation as well as docu- mentation of all significant new processes. Our risk appetite is governed by the ‘more likely than not’ approach. For more details on our approach to taxes, we refer to our tax policy which can be found here: orsted.com/taxpolicy. 126 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 5. Tax Notes Contents Uncertain tax positions Our tax risk management work includes tak- ing into account uncertain tax positions, e.g. when we have taken a position where there is an uncertainty created by a comparison of the wording of the law, the expressed policy intent or lack thereof, or fluctuating or divergent ap- plication by tax authorities or judicial systems in countries where we operate. Tax controversies In an administrative decision, The Danish Tax Agency has concluded that Ørsted Wind Pow- er A/S has not acted at arm’s length terms and conditions when charging fees for technical services provided to two project companies for the Walney Extension and Hornsea 1 offshore wind farms in the UK during the development phase. The decision entails an additional tax payable of DKK 5.1 billion for the income years 2015 and 2016 plus interest. We dispute the deci- sion, and we have lodged an appeal with the Danish National Tax Tribunal and also filed an application for Mutual Agreement Procedure between the Competent Authorities of the Danish Tax Agency and Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs under both the EU Arbitration Convention and the relevant Double Tax Agreement, including the Multilateral Instru- ment. We have further requested a deferral of payment until the case is finally decided. Our application for Mutual Agreement Procedure under both instruments has been confirmed as admissible by the Danish and UK Competent Authorities. Our request for a deferral of pay- ment until the case is finally decided has been accepted by the Danish Tax Agency. We seek to avoid unnecessary disputes, but recognise that in our business, which involves large amounts, cross-border payments, and activities in highly regulated sectors, there will inevitably be a number of claims from the na- tional tax authorities in the markets where we operate that cannot be avoided. In response to these risks, including the current contro- versy involving the development fees for the Walney Extension and Hornsea 1 offshore wind farms, we have made tax-related provisions in accordance with IAS 12, IAS 37, and relevant interpretations, such as IFRIC 23. The provi- sions have been calculated on the basis of differences in tax rates and statistical risks of suffering economic or legal double taxation. Tax controls Within Ørsted, the main control is our four-eye review principle. This means that all our work is reviewed by a colleague. Tax decisions in relation to matters which are subjected to approval by management are approved by the Head of Tax. Tax planning and use of tax incentives We only use business structures that are driven by commercial considerations, aligned with business activity. We do not use so-called secrecy jurisdictions or tax havens to avoid taxes. If we establish an entity in a low or nil- rate jurisdiction, it will be for substantive and commercial reasons. We pay tax on profits ac- cording to where value is created. In order to remain competitive, we make use of incentives and tax relief implemented by governments where we have commercial substance. Danish CFC taxation Denmark has proposed to introduce the CFC rules in the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive. These rules have been proposed several times, most recently in November 2020, but have so far failed to secure a political majority in the Danish Parliament. It was announced in December 2020 that the latest draft bill would not be passed before the end of 2020, and that a public hearing will be conducted on the rules during 2021. We expect the revised CFC rules to enter into force during the course of 2021, but the exact timing is unknown. The overarching purpose of the CFC rules is to prevent companies from undermining the domestic tax base by moving mobile income to low-tax jurisdictions. In such scenarios, the CFC rules will ensure that the income will still be subject to domestic taxation. Pursuant to the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive, a foreign subsidiary shall be considered to be a CFC company if more than one-third of its income consists of CFC income. ‘Other income from intangible property’ is now considered CFC income, but as of yet, there is very little guidance on how to calculate such income. The EU directive exempts subsidiaries from the CFC rules if they have real commercial activity, or if they are not situated in a low-tax jurisdiction. In the latest published draft bill, Denmark has chosen not to include any of these exceptions. Unless such exemptions are included in a revised draft bill, operational for- eign subsidiaries which have been established for commercial purposes can be considered to be CFC companies regardless of whether the corporate residential tax rate is lower, higher, or the same as in Denmark. We see this as a risk and have, in public consultations, proposed that a substance exemption is included in the Danish CFC rules in order to not place Danish companies at a competitive disadvantage. Plum Creek, Wayne County, Texas, the US. 127 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 5. Tax Notes Contents 5.2 Tax on profit (loss) for the year Effective tax rate, DKKm/% DKK million % DKK million % DKK million % DKK million % 2020 2019 Business performance IFRS Business performance IFRS Tax on profit (loss) for the year can be explained as follows: Calculated 22 % tax on profit (loss) before tax (4,147) Adjustments of calculated tax in foreign subsidiaries in relation to 22 % Tax effect of: Non-taxable income and non-deductible costs, etc., net Unrecognised tax assets Tax equity Movement in uncertain tax positions Changes in tax rates Adjustment of tax concerning previous years Effective tax for the year 22 - (3,811) 17 22 - 6 2,814 (15) 2,814 (16) (13) (903) (101) 138 83 (2,123) - 5 1 (1) (1) 11 (13) (903) (101) 138 83 (1,776) - 5 1 (1) (1) 10 (1,948) 22 (2,286) 22 25 (540) (32) (123) 143 (83) (198) (2,756) - 6 - 1 (1) 1 2 31 18 (540) (32) (123) 143 (83) (198) (3,101) - 5 - 1 (1) 1 2 30 Income tax Tax on business performance profit (loss) was DKK 2,123 million in 2020 against DKK 2,756 million in 2019. The effective tax rate was 11 % in 2020 against 31 % in 2019. The effective tax rate for 2020 (11 %) was primar- ily affected by the largely tax-exempt sale of our Danish power distribution business and related activities as well as recognition of a tax liability in connection with tax equity partnerships relat- ed to the onshore wind farms Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek (see more regarding tax equity partnerships in notes 4.5 ‘Tax equity liabilities’ and 5.3 ‘Deferred tax’). Non-taxable income and non-deductible expenses primarily relate to the divestment of the Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses. See more in note 3.4 ‘Divestment of enterprises’. The effective tax rate in 2019 was primarily affected by the sale of assets in certain wind farm projects to a partner in the US as well as the tax equity partnership related to the onshore wind farm Lockett. The movement in uncertain tax positions is a consequence of reassessment of a calculated uncertain tax position. The adjustment of tax concerning previous years primarily relates to a realised discount on payment for utilisation of tax losses in the UK. Accounting policies Tax for the year consists of current tax, changes in deferred tax, and adjustments in respect of previous years. Tax on profit (loss) for the year is recognised in the income statement. Tax relating to other items is recognised in other comprehensive income. Liabilities in respect of uncertain tax positions are measured as follows: – The most-likely-outcome method is applied in cases where there are only two possible outcomes. – The weighted-average method is used in cases where there are more than two possible outcomes. The liability is recognised under ‘Income tax’ or ‘ Deferred tax’, depending on how the realisation of the tax position will affect the financial statement. Key accounting estimate Estimates regarding recognition of income taxes Ørsted is subject to income taxes in all the coun- tries where we operate. Significant judgement and estimates are required in determining the wordwide income taxes and income tax assets and liabilities, including provisions for uncertain tax positions. In the course of conducting business around the world, tax and transfer pricing disputes with tax authorities may occur due to the complex nature of the tax rules related to the business. Judgement is applied to assess the possible outcome of such disputes. We apply the methods prescribed in IFRIC 23 ‘Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments’ when making provisions for uncertain tax positions, and the provisions made are based on different scenarios of possible outcomes. We consider the provisions made to be adequate. However, the actual obligation may deviate and might lead to additional tax in excess of provisions included as uncertain tax provisions depending on the result of litigations and settlements with the relevant tax authorities. Ongoing tax disputes, primarily related to transfer pricing cases, are included as part of ‘Income tax’ and ‘Deferred tax’. Estimates in respect of transfer pricing cases include among others whether corresponding adjustments can be obtained in the relevant juris- dictions, and, in terms of disputes regarding project companies with partners, whether compensation can be obtained from these partners. Any expected compensation from partners are included as part of ‘Other receivables’. 128 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 5. Tax Notes Contents Tax on profit (loss) for the year and other comprehensive income In 2020, tax on IFRS profit (loss) for the year amounted to DKK 1,776 million, consisting of current tax expenses of DKK 2,735 million, changes in deferred tax of DKK 1,635 million, changes in tax rates of DKK 138 million, un- certain tax positions of DKK 101 million, hybrid capital tax of DKK 107 million, tax equity of DKK 903 million, and adjustments of tax concerning previous years of DKK 83 million. Current tax Current tax is the payable tax expense incurred in Ørsted on profit for the year. This differs from taxes paid as a result of payments or refunds regarding prior years and residual payments for the current year. Because of the high level of investments and the subsequent deferrals of payable tax as a consequence of accelerated tax depreciation, our current tax is generally lower than the statutory corporate tax rates during construc- tion and the initial years after first power from a wind farm. The current tax for 2020 has decreased compared to 2019 because there was no tax related to construction agree- ments in 2020. Income tax, DKKm Tax on profit (loss) for the year Tax on other comprehensive income Tax on hybrid capital Total tax for the year Tax on profit (loss) for the year can be broken down as follows: Current tax Deferred tax Changes in tax rates Uncertain tax positions Tax on hybrid capital Tax equity Adjustment of tax concerning previous years 2020 2019 Business performance (2,123) 777 - IFRS (1,776) 430 - (1,346) (1,346) (2,735) 1,288 138 (101) 107 (903) 83 (2,735) 1,635 138 (101) 107 (903) 83 Business performance (2,756) (539) 34 (3,261) (5,605) 3,110 (83) 143 - (123) (198) IFRS (3,101) (194) 34 (3,261) (5,605) 2,765 (83) 143 - (123) (198) Tax on profit (loss) for the year (2,123) (1,776) (2,756) (3,101) Tax on other comprehensive income can be broken down as follows: Current tax Deferred tax Tax on other comprehensive income 430 347 777 430 - 430 (194) (345) (539) (194) - (194) Effective current tax rate (IFRS), 2020, % 74.7 7.9 8.3 0.0 17.3 13.3 Denmark The UK The US Germany The Netherlands Taiwan Income tax for the year is calculated on the basis of the profit (loss) before tax from continuing operations. Tax on hybrid capital was included in current tax in 2019. The figure shows the effective current tax rates based on business perfor- mance in the main coun- tries where we operate. Current tax for the UK is significantly impacted by a prior year adjustment regarding reclassification between deferred tax and current tax. 129 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 5. Tax Notes Contents 5.3 Deferred tax Development in deferred tax In 2020, net deferred tax assets increased. The effect primarily related to the update of the Hornsea 1 transmission asset divestment assumptions, variance on long-term liabil- ities, and financial instruments as well as adjustments to previous years’ deferred tax in the UK. The recognition of the deferred tax liability was increased because of our tax equity partnerships. In 2019, the net deferred tax assets were also impacted by Hornsea 1 since current tax on the deferred gain was triggered when construction was completed. Deferred tax by segment Net deferred tax in our segments primarily concerned the following: – Offshore: a deferred tax asset is recognised related to tax loss carryforwards and internal gains on construction agreements. The deferred tax asset is partially offset by a deferred tax liability as a result of accelerated tax depreciation compared to accounting depreciation regarding property, plant, and equipment. – Onshore: a deferred tax liability is recog- nised related to wind farm assets in tax equity structures. – Markets & Bioenergy: a deferred tax liability related to financial instruments and accel- erated tax depreciation on property, plant, and equipment is recognised. – Other activities/eliminations comprised intra-group eliminations in the joint taxation across segments. Accounting policies Net deferred tax and accumulated investments, 2020, DKKbn US tax equity partnerships We have entered into several tax equity partnership agreements in the US. The expected value of the deferred tax liability related to property, plant, and equipment at the flip date in the tax equity partnership agreement is included in our accounts when the tax equity partner ship is established. The deferred tax liability from existing tax equity partnerships will be gradu- ally reduced based on accounting depreciation after flip-date. See more regarding tax equity partnerships in note 4.5 ‘Tax equity liabilities’. Net deferred tax balance Accumulated net investments 66.7 33.6 32.7 2.9 2.0 -2.1 17.2 11.2 8.2 1.4 0.0 0.4 Denmark The UK The US Germany The Netherlands Taiwan The figure shows the net deferred tax asset (+) or liability (-) on country level as well as total net accumulated investments in each country. The distribution of net investments are affected by the sale of assets constructed by Ørsted in Denmark for operations outside Denmark where Ørsted only has part ownership. Deferred tax 2020, DKKm Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Other activities/ eliminations Deferred tax at 31 December Deferred tax, assets Deferred tax, liabilities Unrecognised tax assets Deferred tax 2019, DKKm Deferred tax, assets Deferred tax, liabilities Unrecognised tax assets 6,250 238 140 6,441 1,611 7 - 1,923 9 - 1,422 - 529 8 31 189 338 25 5 18 20 217 - - 6,784 2,187 200 6,847 3,371 32 The table shows the reconciliation of deferred tax to the balance sheet by segment. The non- recognised deferred tax assets are not expected to give rise to any material income tax consequence in the event of dividends received. 130 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 5. Tax Notes Contents Development in deferred tax assets and liabilities, 2020, DKKm Deferred tax balances at 1 January, net Movements Deferred tax balances at 31 December, net 29 953 (73) 5 (866) (844) (97) 18 757 102 (3) (272) 182 (91) (2,583) (1,814) 47 1,710 29 2 (1,138) (662) (188) (4,397) (3,476) (1,121) (4,597) 36 3,031 405 (25) (757) (1,386) (614) (1,253) (7) (2,078) (478) 30 (109) 542 517 29 953 (73) 5 (866) (844) (97) (1,330) (2,583) (563) (2,913) (3,476) Assets - 5,406 - - 1,138 784 196 4,397 (5,137) 6,784 - 5,254 88 - 866 846 105 2,583 (2,895) 6,847 Intangible assets Property, plant, and equipment Other non-current assets Current assets Decommissioning obligations Other non-current liabilities Current liabilities Tax loss carryforwards Offset Total Development in deferred tax assets and liabilities, 2019, DKKm Intangible assets Property, plant, and equipment Other non-current assets Current assets Decommissioning obligations Other non-current liabilities Current liabilities Tax loss carryforwards Offset Total Significant movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities Movements for the year primarily consist of an increase in tax loss carryforwards as a result of accelerated depreciation for tax purposes, an increase in deferred tax assets regarding the Hornsea 1 transmission asset, and a prior year adjustment regarding the reclassification of losses in the UK in 2019. For tax purposes, depreciation on fixed assets is typically accelerated compared with accounting purposes. As the accelerated depreciation is larger than our taxable profits when we make large invest- ments, our tax loss carryforwards increase when more wind farms enter into operation. The tax loss carryforwards are either offset against deferred tax liabilities on the same wind farm or jurisdiction or offset against expected future profits from the very same wind farm or jurisdiction. Liabilities Accounting policies 47 7,116 29 2 - Deferred tax is recognised in respect of all temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts. However, deferred tax is not recognised in respect of temporary differences relating to: – the acquisition of joint operations, including 122 licence interests 8 - (5,137) 2,187 29 6,207 15 5 - 2 8 - (2,895) 3,371 – other items where differences arise at the time of acquisition, affecting neither the profit (loss) for the year nor the taxable income. However, this does not include differences arising in connection with company acquisitions. Deferred tax is measured depending on how we plan to use the assets and settle the liabilities. We set off tax assets and liabilities when the tax assets can be offset against tax liabilities in the year in which the deferred tax assets are expected to be used. Deferred tax assets are recognised at the value at which they are expected to be used. They may be offset against future earnings. This is done within a joint taxation scheme. Due to timing differences in re- alisation and utilisation of losses, the UK consortium relief rules are not considered to be a joint taxation. This means that tax losses resulting from acceler- ated tax depreciation are accounted for as tax loss carryforwards until they are used, instead of being used to offset taxable income in the same year in affiliated companies. The result is a disproportionate current tax on the overall profits. Intra-group gains and losses are eliminated. Tax losses carried forward in jurisdictions where we have a history of losses are recognised based on other convincing evidence of future profits. Deferred tax is measured based on the tax rules and rates applying when the deferred tax becomes current tax. Changes in deferred tax as a result of changes in tax rates are recognised in profit (loss) for the year. Deferred tax (net liability) related to the tax equity structures is recognised as tax income in the income statement when we take over the agreements. The liability recognised is the amount that we expect to take over once the contribution from the equity partner is repaid, and the tax equity structure flips. 131 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 5. Tax Notes Contents 5.4 Our tax footprint Ørsted’s tax footprint is an effect of how and where we conduct our business. We have paid DKK 1,118 million in corporate in- come taxes in 2020, of which DKK 412 million related to residual tax for 2019. At the end of the year, we expect to have a residual tax of DKK 109 million regarding 2020, primarily due to movement in financial instruments in the last quarter of 2020. Local taxes paid We have made significant investments in offshore wind farms in the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, the US, and Taiwan, resulting in the accumulation of large tax assets in recent years. Accordingly, we have not paid signifi- cant taxes in these countries historically. This is changing as the offshore wind farms are being commissioned and generating positive taxable income, resulting currently in paid taxes in the UK and Taiwan. We expect to start paying corporate tax in the Netherlands in 2021 and in Germany in 2022. We are also continuously investing in the US; however, we do expect to pay tax in the US in 2022-2024, due to the commercial structural set-up in the US. A wind farm life cycle Ørsted operates in several countries (see our global footprint in the management’s review). The design of the individual tax regime in each jurisdiction impacts the tax over the life cycle of our investments and thereby the timing of when we pay tax. Furthermore, in many of the jurisdictions where we operate, there are mandatory or voluntary tax groupings. This means that we will only pay tax on the consolidated result of all of our activities in that country. As a result, continued significant investments in such a country may further defer the time at which we pay taxes in that country. Project phases, wind farm life cycle example A wind farm life cycle begins with the development phase. This includes opportu- nity screening, if applicable, bid preparation, obtaining land rights, grid connection, and permits. The latter activities are further ma- tured if an investment decision is made, and the construction phase commences, which includes construction of the wind farm. During both phases, product, people, and property taxes are borne or collected (see our total tax contribution section). 0 When the wind farm is commissioned and put into operation, income and positive cash flow are generated. In many cases, the effect of tax incentives results in a deferral of taxable income compared to profit before tax for accounting purposes. Conversely, once the deferral ends, the taxable income related to the wind farm will exceed the accounting profit. For this reason, the applicable corporate tax rate and cash tax paid will always differ, but accumulated over the lifetime of the wind farm, they will be identical. Profit (loss) before tax Taxable income Cash flow Development Construction Operation ~2-6 years ~2-4 years ~25-35 years Development activities results in negative cash flow in the beginning of the project life cycle. During construction, the capital employed accelerates materially. Positive income begins when the project enters operation. 132 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 5. Tax Notes Contents Total tax contribution According to the OECD classification, tax is a compulsory unrequited payment to general government. This means a payment paid by Ørsted to the government, including amounts paid through an agent. Tax does not result in a return of value to Ørsted for a right or asset used in the business. Taxes borne by Ørsted are those that rep- resent a direct cost and are reflected in the financial result. Taxes borne are charged to the profit and loss account. Product taxes Total global taxes paid in 2020 Taxes borne – by tax type, 2020, DKKm Taxes borne – by country, 2020, DKKm Profit taxes These include taxes on company profits that are borne (such as corporate income tax) and collected (such as withholding tax on payments to third parties). Profit taxes People taxes Product taxes Property taxes People taxes Taxes on employment, both borne and collected (including income tax and social security tax payments). 185 0 112 DKK 1,415 million Indirect taxes on the production and consumption of goods and services, including net VAT and sales tax, custom duties, and insurance premium tax. Net VAT in countries in a net refund position is excluded in the total tax contribution, as it is considered a repayment of tax already paid within the year. Denmark The UK The US Germany The Netherlands Taiwan Malaysia Poland Sweden 66 2 0 55 4 24 0 245 DKK 1,415 million 1,118 1,019 Taxes collected are those which are generated by Ørsted’s operations, but do not constitute a tax liability for Ørsted. Ørsted generates the commercial activity that gives rise to the taxes and then collects and administers them on behalf of the tax authorities in the countries where we operate. Total tax contribution is highly impacted by collection of VAT, sales taxes, duties as well as profit taxes. 12.0 bn Our total tax contribution in 2020 totalled DKK 12,028 million. Property taxes Taxes on the ownership, sale, transfer, or occupancy of property. Total tax contribution, 2020, DKKm Taxes collected – by tax type, 2020, DKKm Taxes collected – by country, 2020, DKKm Profit taxes People taxes Product taxes Property taxes Profit taxes People taxes Product taxes Property taxes 10,613 12,028 185 8,533 1,631 449 8,533 1,743 1,567 1,415 185 112 1,118 Borne taxes Collected taxes Total Denmark The UK The US Germany The Netherlands Taiwan Malaysia Poland Sweden 162 33 12 13 10 8 106 1,130 0 449 1,631 DKK 10,613 million DKK 10,613 million The chart shows the distribution between borne and collected taxes in 2020. 8,533 9,139 133 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 5. Tax Notes Contents Country-by-country reporting In order to increase transparency, we present key figures on tax jurisdiction levels below. Ørsted’s country-by-country reporting widely follows the GRI 207: Tax standard. Corporate income tax is based on IFRS reporting stan- dards instead of GRI methodology to ensure internal coherence throughout the annual report. The tax incentives provided on green investments defer our tax payments, resulting in a difference between profit (loss) in the accounts and taxable income during the life cycle of a wind farm. This is applicable in most of the countries where we operate. Country-by-country key figures – IFRS, 2020 Number of employees Total employee remuneration2 Revenues from third-party sales DKKm Revenues from intra- group transactions with other tax jurisdictions, DKKm Property, plant, and equipment, and inventory DKKm Balance of intra- company debt DKKm Corporate income tax paid on a cash basis, DKKm Denmark The UK The US Germany The Netherlands Taiwan Malaysia Poland Sweden Other countries1 Total 3,854 1,057 314 219 45 126 274 233 4 53 3,509 811 378 176 35 121 57 80 2 52 31,108 12,962 2,526 2,968 381 7 - - 199 - 10,398 7,960 2 685 348 21 101 122 - 167 14,103 60,144 31,702 11,264 10,860 8,190 3 5 2 76 19,679 65,959 7,540 17,161 8,379 1,732 - - - - The table shows reporting of financial, economic, and tax-related information for each jurisdiction where we operate. This information can be compared with our total tax contribution. Our tax contributions reflect that some of our development and construc- tion activities have been based in Denmark, and that our operations in the coming years are beginning to ramp up in markets that have been developed. Also, our presence and the corresponding tax position is affected by hedging, which is primarily handled centrally in Denmark 976 120 (33) 2 - 50 - 3 - - 6,179 5,221 50,151 19,804 136,349 120,450 1,118 1 Other countries include Isle of Man, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. 2 Including employee costs transferred to assets. Current tax explanation on country level, 2020, DKKm Profit (loss) before tax Calculated local corporate tax on profit (loss) before tax Non-taxable income and non-deductible costs, etc., net Unrecognised tax assets Deferred tax Denmark The UK The US The Netherlands Germany Taiwan Malaysia Poland Sweden Other countries1 Total 15,298 1,850 (1,097) 162 930 196 22 15 14 (66) (3,366) (352) 247 (41) (279) (39) (4) (3) (3) 29 2,862 (112) (25) 25 64 - - - - - 17,324 (3,811) 2,814 1 Other countries include Isle of Man, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. - - - - (7) - - - - (6) (13) (588) (973) (279) (15) 223 (3) - 2 - (2) (1,635) Other adjustments (123) 55 57 3 (78) 16 4 1 3 (28) (90) Current tax (1,215) (1,382) - (28) (77) (26) - - - (7) (2,735) The table shows our profit (loss) before tax in tax jurisdictions and the journey to current tax. Current tax for the UK is significantly impacted by a prior year adjustment regarding reclassification between deferred tax and current tax (see more in accounting policies in note 5.3 ‘Deferred tax’). 134 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Notes Contents 6. Capital structure 136 Capital structure 137 Interest-bearing debt and FFO 139 Equity 141 Hybrid capital 142 Financial resources 144 Financial income and expenses Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 6. Capital structure Notes Contents 6. Capital structure An appropriate capital structure is important to ensure we have the ability to raise new debt at attractive terms. In 2020, we issued new green senior bonds with a total proceed of DKK 3,277 million, consisting of NTD 15 billion. All new bonds were issued in accordance with our Green Finance Framework. Financing policy The aim of our financing policy is to ensure that hedging needs and the best possible financing arrangements are taken into account, while also minimising financing costs, liquidity, and refinancing risks. Cash management One of the most significant cash management objectives is to secure sufficient and flexible financial resources in relation to our day- to-day operations, investment programme, and debt maturity profile. The borrowing activities are diversified among various funding sources and maturities. In addition, we have robust financial resources. Therefore, we define minimum financial resources for the coming calendar year. We maintain robust financial resources to limit the company’s sensitivity to unrest in the financial markets. In the coming years, we expect to raise new debt to partly fund our DKK 200 billion investment programme covering the period 2019-2025. Our borrowing activities are primarily consolidated in the parent company where cash resources are available to the Group companies via an internal bank. Capital structure To ensure the financial strength to operate in the international energy and capital markets and secure financing on attractive terms, we have defined credit rating and capital structure targets. The overarching capital structure targets are a credit rating of Baa1/BBB+ and an FFO/adjusted net debt credit metric of around 30 %. Equity and interest-bearing net debt, DKKbn Interest-bearing assets Interest-bearing debt Hybrid capital Equity attributable to shareholders in Ørsted A/S Non-controlling interests 2020 Assets DKK 32.1 billion 2019 Assets DKK 26.2 billion DKK 109.7 billion Equity and liabilities DKK 141.7 billion DKK 106.8 billion Equity and liabilities DKK 132.6 billion 48.3 % Funds from operations (FFO) relative to adjusted interest-bearing net debt amounted to 48.3 % at 31 December 2020 against 31 % at 31 December 2019. 12.3 bn Our interest-bearing net debt totalled DKK 12,343 million at 31 December 2020 against DKK 17,230 million at 31 December 2019. 45.6 bn Our financial resources totalled DKK 45,642 million at 31 December 2020 against DKK 38,244 million at 31 December 2019. 136 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 6. Capital structure Notes Contents 6.1 Interest-bearing debt and FFO Interest-bearing debt and interest-bearing assets DKKm 2020 2019 Interest-bearing debt: Bank debt Bond debt Total bond and bank debt Tax equity liability (see note 4.5) Lease liability Other interest-bearing debt Total interest-bearing debt Interest-bearing assets: Securities Cash Other receivables Receivables in connection with divestments Total interest-bearing assets Total interest-bearing net debt Changes in interest-bearing debt, DKKm Interest-bearing debt at 1 January Lease debt at 1 January (IFRS 16) Instalments on loans according to the statement of cash flows Proceeds from raising of loans according to the statement of cash flows Instalments on leases Raising of lease debt, etc. Change in other interest-bearing debt and tax equity liability Hybrid bonds reclassified to interest-bearing debt Foreign exchange adjustments and amortisation Interest-bearing debt at 31 December 1,942 34,824 36,766 721 5,054 1,906 3,466 33,373 36,839 608 5,332 649 44,447 43,428 25,173 6,178 11 742 32,104 12,343 16,552 7,148 1,781 717 26,198 17,230 2020 43,428 - 2019 28,320 5,224 (2,398) (2,043) 3,406 (541) 263 1,371 - (1,082) 44,447 10,174 (664) 772 231 570 844 43,428 The market value of our bond and bank debt amounted to DKK 42,485 million and DKK 1,971 million, respectively, at 31 December 2020 (2019: DKK 39,281 million and DKK 3,526 million, respectively). The market value of our bond and bank debt exceeds the carrying amount due to the drop in interest levels since the issuance of the debt. Interest-bearing debt increased by DKK 1,019 million in 2020. Funds from operations (FFO), DKKm EBITDA – business performance Interest expenses, net Interest expenses, leasing Reversal of interest expenses transferred to assets Interest element of decommissioning obligations 50 % of coupon payments on hybrid capital Adjusted interest expenses, net Reversal of gain (loss) on divestment of assets Total current tax Funds from operations (FFO) 2020 18,124 (1,202) (177) (449) (238) (245) (2,311) (805) (2,304) 12,704 2019 17,484 (1,312) (171) (344) (212) (279) (2,318) 101 (5,799) 9,468 FFO is calculated for continuing operations. FFO has increased by DKK 3,236 million in 2020, mainly due to a decrease in current tax level. Adjusted interest-bearing net debt, DKKm Total interest-bearing net debt 50 % of hybrid capital Cash and securities not available for distribution, excluding repo loans Decommissioning obligations Deferred tax on decommissioning obligations Total adjusted interest-bearing net debt Funds from operations (FFO)/ adjusted interest-bearing net debt, % Funds from operations (FFO)/ adjusted interest-bearing net debt 2020 12,343 6,616 1,485 7,002 (1,138) 26,308 2019 17,230 6,616 1,437 6,158 (866) 30,575 2020 2019 48.3 % 31.0 % Total adjusted interest-bearing net debt decreased by DKK 4,267 million in 2020, mainly due to the decrease in interest-bearing net debt. 137 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 6. Capital structure Notes Contents Interest-bearing net debt Interest-bearing net debt totalled DKK 12,343 million at the end of 2020, a decrease of DKK 4,887 million relative to 2019. The de- crease in interest-bearing net debt consists of a increase in interest-bearing debt of DKK 1,020 million and an increase in interest - bearing assets of DKK 5,907 million. In November, we issued a total of NTD 15 billion (DKK 3,277 million) in new green bonds, split on 3 separate issues: – NTD 4 billion (DKK 874 million), 0.6 % interest, maturing in November 2027. – NTD 3 billion (DKK 655 million), 0.70 % interest, maturing in November 2030. – NTD 8 billion (DKK 1,748 million), 0.98 % interest, maturing in November 2040. Rating We have a corporate credit rating of BBB+/ Baa1, stable outlook, from Standard & Poor’s, Senior bonds issued at 31 December 2020 Million Outstanding amount Moody’s, and Fitch, which is in line with our target. FFO/adjusted interest-bearing net debt was 48.3 % in 2020, in line with our target. downgrading our rating to Baa3, BBB- or below, respectively. Loan arrangements At 31 December 2020, we had loan obligations totalling DKK 1,642 million (2019: DKK 1,861 mil- lion) to the European Investment Bank and the Nordic Investment Bank. The loans are recog- nised in the balance sheet under bank debt. The loans offered by these multilateral financial institutions include loans to co-fund infrastruc- ture and energy projects on favourable terms and with maturities exceeding those normally available in the commercial banking market. In connection with these loans, the Group may be met with demands for repayment or collateral in the event of the Danish state holding less than 50 % of the share capital or voting rights in Ørsted A/S (change of control) or for repayment in the event of Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s Credit facilities Furthermore, we had non-cancellable credit facilities of DKK 15,758 million at 31 December 2020 (2019: DKK 15,990 million) with a number of Scandinavian, international, and local Taiwanese banks. In connection with these credit facilities, we may be met with demands for cancellation and repayment of any drawn amount in the event of shareholders other than a group consisting of the Danish state and Danish power distribution companies controlling more than 50 % of the share capital or voting rights in Ørsted A/S or in the event of the Danish state ceasing to hold at least 20 % of the share capital. Our financing agreements are not subject to any other unusual terms or conditions. Accounting policies Bond debt, bank debt, and other payables are recognised at inception at market value (typically proceeds received) net of transaction costs incurred. In subsequent periods, the liabilities are measured at amortised cost, so that the difference between the cost (proceeds) and the nominal value is recognised in profit (loss) for the year as interest expenses over the term of the loan, using the effective interest rate method. Financial liabilities are classified as current, unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settle- ment of the liability to at least one year after the balance sheet date. The market value of issued bonds has been determined as the market value at 31 December (level 1 – quoted prices). The market value of bank loans has been determined as the present value of expected future instalments and interest payments using the Group’s current interest rate on loans as the discount rate (level 2 – observable inputs). Currency Issued DKK Coupon (%) Time of issue Maturing Quoted in EUR EUR EUR GBP GBP GBP GBP GBP NTD NTD NTD NTD NTD 272 517 750 350 750 300 250 500 8,000 4,000 3,000 8,000 4,000 2,025 3,848 5,583 2,911 6,237 2,495 2,079 4,158 1,732 866 650 1,732 866 4.875 2.625 1.500 2.125 4.875 2.500 16 Dec. 2009 16 Dec. 2021 19 Sep. 2012 19 Sep. 2022 24 Nov. 2017 26 Nov. 2029 London London London 16 May 2019 17 May 2027 Luxembourg 12 Jan. 2012 12 Jan. 2032 London 16 May 2019 16 May 2033 Luxembourg CPI+0.375 16 May 2019 16 May 2034 Luxembourg 5.750 1.500 0.600 0.700 0.980 0.920 9 Apr. 2010 9 Apr. 2040 London 19 Nov. 2019 19 Nov 2034 13 Nov. 2020 13 Nov. 2027 13 Nov. 2020 13 Nov. 2030 13 Nov. 2020 13 Nov. 2040 19 Nov. 2019 19 Nov 2026 Taipei Taipei Taipei Taipei Taipei In addition to senior bonds, we have issued a number of hybrid bonds, see note 6.3 ‘Hybrid capital’. Maturity profile of bond and bank debt , DKK billion 19.1 The majority of our debt is to be repaid in 2030 and later. 4.7 2.1 5.6 3.8 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030+ 138 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 6. Capital structure Notes Contents 6.2 Equity Share capital Ørsted’s share capital is DKK 4,203,810,800 (2019: 4,204 million), divided into shares of DKK 10. The share capital is unchanged from last year. No shares are subject to special rights or restrictions on voting rights. All shares are fully paid up. Treasury shares To secure our share programme, we acquired additional treasury shares in May 2020. The total portfolio of treasury shares consists of 312,844 shares at 31 December 2020 (2019: 395,619), corresponding to less than 0.1 % of the share capital. Dividend yield, % 2.2 1.5 0.9 2018 2019 2020 The graph shows the proposed dividends in relation to the closing price for an Ørsted share on the last trading day of the year. Dividends The Board of Directors recommends that dividends of DKK 4,834 million (2019: DKK 4,414 million) be paid for the financial year, corresponding to DKK 11.50 per share (2019: DKK 10.50 per share). The proposed dividends correspond to a dividend yield of 0.9 % (2019: 1.5 %), calculated on the basis of the closing price for an Ørsted share on the last trading day of the year. Owners in Ørsted The Danish state is the principal shareholder with an ownership interest of 50.1 %. In addi- tion, Andel and The Capital Group Companies, Inc. have an ownership interest above 5 %. See note 16 ‘Ownership information’ in the parent company’s financial statements. Earnings per share, DKKm Profit (loss) for the year from continuing operations Interest and costs, hybrid capital owners of Ørsted A/S Non-controlling interests Ørsted’s share of profit (loss) for the year from continuing operations Profit (loss) for the year from discontinued operations Ørsted’s share of profit (loss) for the year from discontinued operations (’000) Average number of outstanding shares 2020 2019 Business performance IFRS Business performance IFRS 16,727 15,548 6,100 7,291 (488) 61 (488) 61 (675) (54) (675) (54) 16,300 15,121 5,371 6,562 (11) (11) (11) (11) (56) (56) (56) (56) 420,056 420,056 420,080 420,080 Dilutive effect of share programme 300 300 408 408 Average number of outstanding shares, diluted 420,356 420,356 420,488 420,488 (DKK) Profit (loss) per share From continuing operations From discontinued operations Total profit (loss) per share 38.8 0.0 38.8 36.0 0.0 36.0 12.8 (0.1) 12.7 15.6 (0.1) 15.5 The table shows earnings per share distributed on continuing and discontinued operations. Diluted profit (loss) per share corresponds to profit (loss) per share, as the only dilutive effect comes from the share programme and equals 0.1 % of the share capital (2019: 0.1 % of the share capital). 139 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 6. Capital structure Notes Contents Hedging reserve1 Hedging of net investments Hedging of revenue Hedging of divestments Hedging of interest Hedging of production assets Reserves 2020, DKKm Reserves at 1 January 2020 Exchange rate adjustments Value adjustments of hedging Value adjustments transferred to: Revenue Other operating income Financial income and expenses Tax: Tax on hedging and currency adjustments Movement in comprehensive income for the year Total reserves at 31 December Foreign currency translation reserve 168 (4,993) - - - - 996 (3,997) (3,829) (976) - 2,163 - - - (476) 1,687 711 1,459 - (246) 69 - - (47) (224) 1,235 (3) - 67 (58) (181) - 42 (130) (133) (235) - (110) - - 471 (81) 280 45 1 Costs of hedging related to basis spread on currency swaps included in hedging reserve amount to DKK 55 million (2019: 94 million). Reserves 2019, DKKm Reserves at 1 January 2019 Exchange rate adjustments Value adjustments of hedging Value adjustments transferred to: Revenue Financial income and expenses Tax: Tax on hedging and currency adjustments Movement in comprehensive income for the year Total reserves at 31 December (1,906) 2,528 - - - (454) 2,074 168 512 - (1,907) - - 419 (1,488) (976) (97) - 1,641 49 - (134) 1,556 1,459 (40) - (172) 219 - (10) 37 (3) (296) - (12) - 88 (15) 61 (235) - - 19 - - - (4) 15 15 - - - - - - - - Total reserves 413 (4,993) 1,893 11 (181) 471 430 (2,369) (1,956) (1,827) 2,528 (450) 268 88 (194) 2,240 413 Foreign currency translation reserve The foreign currency translation reserve comprises: – exchange rate adjustments arising on translation of the financial statements of foreign entities with a currency that is not the Group’s functional currency – exchange rate adjustments relating to loans that form part of our net investment in such entities – exchange rate adjustments relating to hedging transactions on our net investment in such entities. On realisation or partial realisation of the net investment, the exchange rate adjustments are recognised in profit (loss) for the year if a foreign exchange gain (loss) is realised by the divested entity. The foreign exchange gain (loss) is transferred to the item in which the gain (loss) is recognised. Hedging reserve The hedging reserve covers: – hedging of net investments in foreign operations – cash flow hedging of currency risks, inflation risks associated with revenue, and power price risk – cash flow hedging of interest expenses and the currency risk associated with the construction of offshore wind farms. Deferred costs of hedging Changes in the basic spread on currency swaps and time value of options are included in deferred costs of hedging. Share premium reserve Retained earnings include the share premium reserve of DKK 21,279 million (2019: 21,279 million), represent- ing the excess of the amount of subscribed-for share capital over the nominal value of these shares in connection with capital injections. 140 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 6. Capital structure Notes Contents 6.3 Hybrid capital Hybrid bonds Type Carrying amount Financial classification Notional amount Issued Maturing Quoted in First redemption date at par Interest Due in 3013 Due in 3017 Due in 3019 Subordinate to other creditors Subordinate to other creditors Subordinate to other creditors DKK 5,148 million Equity DKK 3,668 million Equity DKK 4,416 million Equity EUR 700 million (DKK 5,210 million) EUR 500 million (DKK 3,722 million) EUR 600 million (DKK 4,466 million) June 2013 June 3013 Luxembourg 26 June 2023 November 2017 November 3017 Luxembourg 24 November 2024 December 2019 December 3019 Luxembourg 9 December 2027 For the first ten years, the coupon is fixed at 6.25 % p.a., after which it is adjusted every five years with the five-year euro swap +4.75 percentage points from 2023-2043 +5.5 percentage points after 2043 Coupon for the first seven years is fixed at 2.25 % p.a., after which it is adjusted every five years with the five-year euro swap +1.899 percentage points from 2024 +2.149 percentage points from 2029 +2.899 percentage points from 2044 Coupon for the first eight years at 1.75 % p.a., after which it is adjusted every five years with the five-year euro swap +1.952 percentage points from 2027 +2.02 percentage points from 2032 +2.952 percentage points from 2047 Deferral of interest payment Optional Optional Optional We have issued hybrid capital which is sub- ordinate to our other creditors. The purpose of issuing hybrid capital is to strengthen our capital base and fund our investments. We have issued EUR hybrid bonds with a total nominal value of EUR 1,800 million, equivalent to DKK 13,398 million (2019: EUR 1,876 million, equivalent to DKK 14,019 million). decide to pay dividends to our shareholders or pay coupon payments on other hybrid bonds. As a consequence of the special terms regarding the hybrid bonds, these are classi- fied as equity, and therefore coupon payments are recognised in equity. In 2020, we have redeemed the remaining outstanding EUR 76 million on our 3015 bond. For hybrid bonds, we may defer coupon pay- ments to bond holders and ultimately decide not to pay them at maturity. Deferred coupon payments become payable, however, if we Accounting policies Hybrid capital comprises issued bonds that qualify for treatment in accordance with the rules on compound financial instruments due to the special characteristics of the bonds. The notional amount, which constitutes a liability, is recognised at present value, and equity has been increased by the difference between the net proceeds received and the present value of the dis- counted liability. Accordingly, any coupon payments are accounted for as dividends, which are recognised directly in equity at the time the payment obligation arises. This is because the coupon is discretionary, and therefore any deferred coupon lapses upon maturity of the hybrid capital. Consequently, coupon payments do not have any effect on profit (loss) for the year. The part of the hybrid capital that is accounted for as a liability is measured at amortised cost. However, as the carrying amount of this component amounted to nil on initial recognition and due to the 1,000-year term of the hybrid capital, amortisation charges will only have an impact on profit (loss) for the year towards the end of the 1,000-year term of the hybrid capital. Coupon payments are recognised in the statement of cash flows in the same way as dividend payments within financing activities. On redemption of hybrid capital, the payment will be distributed between liability and equity, applying the same principles as used when the hybrid capital was issued. This means that the difference between the payment on redemption and the net proceeds re- ceived on issue is recognised directly in equity, as the debt portion of the existing hybrid issues will be nil during the first part of the life of the hybrid capital. On the date when the Board of Directors decides to exercise an option to redeem hybrid capital, the part of the hybrid capital that will be redeemed will be reclassified to loans and borrowings. The reclassification will be made at the market value of the hybrid capital at the date the decision is made. Coupon payments and exchange rate adjust- ments following the reclassification to loans and borrowings will be recognised in profit (loss) for the year as financial income or expenses. 141 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 6. Capital structure Notes Contents 6.4 Financial resources Financial resources at 31 December 2020 amount to DKK 45,624 million (2019: DKK 38,244 million). The change in financial resources is due to an increase of DKK 8,629 million in securities, partially offset by a decrease in cash and undrawn credit facilities of DKK 1,017 million and DKK 232 million, respectively. Cash, cash equivalents, and securities Securities are a key element in our financial resources, and therefore investments are mainly made in liquid AAA-rated Danish mortgage bonds and to a lesser extent in other bonds. Most of the securities qualify for repo transac- tions with the Danish central bank, ‘Danmarks Nationalbank’. Securities not available for use comprise securities pledged as collateral for: – insurance- related provisions: DKK 393 million at 31 December 2020 (2019: DKK 397 million) – trading in financial instruments: DKK 356 million at 31 December 2020 (2019: DKK 360 million). At 31 December 2020, we had received cash collateral in the amount of DKK 12 million (2019: DKK 1,439 million) concerning the positive market value of derivatives. Cash not available for use comprises: – collateral for insurance-related provisions: DKK 263 million (2019: DKK 277 million) – collateral for US power purchase agreements: DKK 426 million (2019: DKK 132 million) – collateral for other transactions: DKK 47 million (2019: DKK 280 million). Cash and cash equivalents, securities, DKKm Cash, available Bank overdrafts that are part of the ongoing cash management Total cash and cash equivalents at 31 December, cf. statement of cash flows Cash can be specified as follows: Cash, available Cash, not available for use Total cash at 31 December, cf. balance sheet Securities can be specified as follows: Securities, available Securities, not available for use Total securities at 31 December The table shows our cash and securities divided into available and not available for use. 2020 5,442 (232) 5,210 5,442 736 6,178 2019 6,459 - 6,459 6,459 689 7,148 24,424 15,795 749 757 25,173 16,552 Financial resources, DKK million Overview of securities, DKKm Cash, available Securities, available Undrawn, non-cancellable credit facilities 2020 DKK 45,624 million Maturities 0-2 years 2-5 years After 5 years Total carrying amount Fixed rate Floating rate 1,304 2,010 5,597 8,911 3,067 9,738 3,457 2020 4,371 11,748 9,054 Fixed rate 929 7,309 3,982 Floating rate 932 2019 1,861 3,400 10,709 - 3,982 16,262 25,173 12,220 4,332 16,552 2019 DKK 38,244 million The table shows our securities split into maturities and fixed or floating interest rates. The overview includes interest rate swaps used to manage the interest rate risk on the securities. 142 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 6. Capital structure Notes Contents Maturity analysis of financial liabilities 2020, DKKm 2021 2022 2023-2024 After 2024 2020 Accounting policies Bank loans and issued bonds: - Notional amount - Interest payments Trade payables Derivatives Tax equity debt Other payables Liabilities relating to assets classified as held for sale 2,133 1,020 9,742 5,786 48 5,386 94 4,700 920 - 1,562 105 59 - 106 1,639 - 997 153 701 - 29,846 8,083 - 825 1,102 307 - 36,785 11,662 9,742 9,170 1,408 6,453 94 Total payment obligations 24,209 7,346 3,596 40,163 75,314 Maturity analysis of financial liabilities 2019, DKKm 2020 2021 2022-2023 After 2023 2019 Bank loans and issued bonds: - Notional amount - Interest payments Trade payables Derivatives Tax equity debt Other payables Liabilities relating to assets classified as held for sale 804 1,076 10,957 5,226 58 4,940 1,287 2,169 1,056 - 1,814 51 - - 4,854 1,819 - 1,663 64 - - 29,349 9,089 - 495 1,133 - - 37,176 13,040 10,957 9,198 1,306 4,940 1,287 Total payment obligations 24,348 5,090 8,400 40,066 77,904 Securities comprise bonds that are monitored, measured, and reported at market value on an on going basis in conformity with the Group’s investment policy. Changes in market value are recognised in profit (loss) for the year as financial income and expenses. Purchase and sale of securities are recognised at the settlement date. For listed securities, market value equals the market price, and for unlisted securities, market value is estimated based on generally accepted valuation methods and market data. Divested securities where repurchase agreements (repo transactions) have been made at the time of sale are recognised in the balance sheet at the settlement date as if the securities were still held. The amount received is recognised as a liability, and the difference between the selling price and the purchase price is recognised in profit (loss) for the year over the term as interest. The return on the securities is recognised in profit (loss) for the year. The Group’s cash needs in respect of its financial loans and borrowings are shown in the table above. The maturity analysis was determined on 31 December. The maturity analysis is based on undiscounted cash flows, including estimated interest payments. Interest payments are based on market conditions and interest -rate hedging entered into on 31 December. The maturity analysis does not include hybrid capital classified as equity. At 31 December 2020, we had issued hybrid capital with a notional amount totalling DKK 13,398 million due in 3013 (DKK 5,210 million), 3017 (DKK 3,722 million), and 3019 (DKK 4,466 million), respectively. The maturity analysis for leasing is part of note 8.2 ‘Leases’. 143 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 6. Capital structure Notes Contents 6.5 Financial income and expenses Net financial income and expenses, DKKm Interest expenses, net Interest expenses, leasing Interest element of provisions, etc. Tax equity partner’s contractual return Value adjustments of derivatives, net Capital losses on early repayment of loans and interest rate swaps Exchange rate adjustments, net Value adjustments of securities, net Other financial income and expenses Net financial income and expenses 2020 (1,202) (177) (452) (486) (112) (373) 188 (12) 102 2019 (1,312) (171) (428) (307) (181) - 1,038 147 79 (2,524) (1,135) The table shows net financial income and expenses, corresponding to our internal reporting. Exchange rate adjustments and hedging contracts entered into to hedge currency risks are presented net under the item ‘Exchange rate adjustments, net’. Accounting policies Market value adjustments of interest rate and currency derivatives that have not been entered into for hedging purposes are presented as financial income or expenses. The accounting policy for the tax equity partner’s contractual return is described in note 4.5 ‘Tax equity liabilities’. Financial income and expenses, DKKm Interest income from cash, etc. Interest income from securities at market value Capital gains on securities at market value Foreign exchange gains Value adjustments of derivatives Other financial income Total financial income Interest expenses relating to loans and borrowings, etc. Interest expenses transferred to assets Interest expenses, leasing Interest element of provisions Tax equity partners´ contractual returns Capital losses on securities at market value Foreign exchange losses Value adjustments of derivatives Other financial expenses Total financial expenses Net financial income and expenses 2020 237 137 - 3,605 1,766 34 5,779 (2,026) 449 (177) (352) (486) (12) (3,623) (2,012) (64) (8,303) (2,524) 2019 65 226 161 3,020 4,185 61 7,718 (1,947) 344 (171) (289) (307) (24) (2,219) (4,069) (171) (8,853) (1,135) Exchange rate adjust ments of currency hedging are recognised in revenue and cost of sales with a gain of DKK 1,059 million (2019: a loss of DKK 1,943 million). Borrowing costs transferred to property, plant, and equipment under construction are calculated at the weighted average effective interest rate for general borrowing. This amounted to 3.3 % in 2020 (2019: 4.0 %). The reduction is due to new bonds being issued at a lower interest rate. 144 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Notes Contents 7. Risk management 146 Risk management 147 Market risks 149 Hedge accounting and economic hedging 152 Energy trading portfolio 153 Sensitivity analysis of financial instruments 154 Credit risks Categories of financial instruments 155 156 Fair value measurement Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 7. Risk management Notes Contents 7. Risk management Market and credit risks are a natural part of our business activities and a precondition for being able to create value. Through risk management, risks are reduced to an acceptable level. Currency and energy exposures Our forward-looking energy and currency exposures from produc tion, sales, investments, and divestments are presented in the figures to the right. Trading portfolio We have a limited trading portfolio, the main purpose of which is to optimise the execution of hedging contracts and gains from short-term energy price fluctuations. The trading activities comply with the man- dates approved by the Board of Directors. Read more in note 7.3 ‘Energy trading portfolio’. Currency exposure, GBP and NTD 2021-2025, USD 2021-2036, DKKbn Energy exposure 2021-2025 DKKbn Before hedging After hedging 60.2 Before hedging After hedging 23.9 19.1 19.5 12.8 5.8 4.8 8.2 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.7 -2.7 bn As of 1 January 2021, we will cease to use the business performance principle and instead begin to apply IFRS hedge accounting on all commodity and related currency hedges. As of 31 December 2020, we had a loss of DKK 2,685 million on our business performance hedges deferred to a later period. This amount will not impact the IFRS number, as we have already recognised the loss under IFRS in the income statement. GBP USD NTD Our currency exposures are significantly reduced due to hedging. For USD, we manage our risk as a natural time spread between front-end capital expenditures and long-end revenue between 2021-2036. We do not deem EUR to constitute a risk, as we expect Denmark to maintain its fixed exchange- rate policy. -2.0 -1.8 Oil Gas Outright power Spread (power) +1.3 bn Our energy exposures are significantly reduced due to hedging. Our main energy exposure is towards UK power as the UK is Offshore’s largest market. The value of hedging instruments (mainly inflation, power, and currency) that will impact the IFRS EBITDA in the future amounts to a gain of DKK 1,278 million at 31 December 2020. +0.7 bn The deferred gains from US power purchase agreements (PPAs) amount to DKK 736 million that will be recognised as revenue over the remaining life of the PPAs. 146 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 7. Risk management Notes Contents 7.1 Market risks Market risks and market risk management Our most significant market risks relate to: – energy prices – foreign exchange rates – interest and inflation. We manage market risks to protect Ørsted against market price volatility and ensure stable and robust financial ratios that support our growth strategy as well as protect the value of our assets. In the short- to medium-term horizon, we primarily hedge future prices using derivatives to reduce cash flow fluctuations after tax. Minimum hedging levels are determined by the Board of Directors. In the first two years, we are almost fully hedged. The degree of hedging declines in subsequent years due to: – reduced certainty about long-term production volumes – increasing hedging costs in the medium to long term, both spread costs and costs of collateral – adverse impacts from collateral, potentially tying up large amounts of capital if hedging contracts become unfavourable. Our long-term market risk picture is deter- mined by our strategic asset portfolio. Our power exposure is partly mitigated through long-term power purchasing agreements (PPAs), and we use debt to manage currency, interest rate, and inflation risks. Energy price risks Our consolidated energy exposure for the years 2021-2025 after hedging can be summa- rised as shown in the table. Risk after hedging DKKbn Effect of price change -10 % +10 % Power: 8.2 sales position Gas: 0.3 sales position Oil: 0.2 sales position Spread: 0.7 sales position +0.8 +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 -0.8 -0.0 -0.0 -0.1 Therefore, a 10 % increase in the power price in 2021-2025 will result in a gain of DKK 0.8 billion in the period, all else remaining unchanged. Currency risks Our consolidated currency exposure after hedging for the years 2021-2025 (USD 2021- 2036) can be summarised as shown in the table. Risk after hedging DKKbn Effect of price change -10 % +10 % GBP: 19.1 sales position NTD: 4.8 sales position USD: 12.8 sales position +1.9 +0.5 +1.3 -1.9 -0.5 -1.3 Our main currency exposure stems from offshore wind farms in the UK, but activities in the US and Taiwan have increased our USD and NTD exposures. In general, highly certain cash flows in a foreign currency are hedged within the first five years. Exchange rates related to energy prices in foreign currencies are not hedged until the energy price is hedged. Hence, the GBP exchange rate associated with power generation in the UK is not hedged until the GBP power price is hedged. Cash flows that relate to fixed tariffs and guaranteed minimum prices from offshore wind farms in the UK deviate from the main principle. Hedging of these, less operating expenses, is based on a declining level of hedging over the five-year risk management horizon. The target is to hedge 100 % of the risk in year 1, declining by 20 percentage points each year, to 20 % in year 5. Our GBP exposure amounted to DKK 19.1 billion after hedging for the years 2021-2025. This unhedged GBP exposure stems from subsidised GBP income less operational expenditures. The GBP exchange rate for hedges impacting EBITDA in 2021 and 2022 is hedged at an average exchange rate of GBP/DKK 8.3 and 8.1, respectively. For our USD and NTD exposures from new markets, we have limited existing portfolio against which we can net construction payments. Therefore, we seek to hedge the price risk in the near term, while simultaneously hedging a similar, but opposite, exposure in the longer term. Our EUR risk is subject to contin- uous assessment, but is generally not hedged, as we believe that Denmark will maintain its fixed exchange-rate policy. GBP exposures, DKKbn Before hedging After hedging 18.5 10.6 9.5 9.5 10.9 6.2 10.7 7.9 -0.2 2021 -4.3 2022 2023 2024 2025 The graph shows our GBP exposure before and after hedges from: – divestments and investments – green certificates – hedged energy. The divestment proceeds from the Hornsea 2 transmis- sion asset were previously expected in 2022, but are now expected in 2023. The related hedges will remain in 2022 until we know the final timing of the divestment. 147 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 7. Risk management Notes Contents Interest and inflation risk To a certain extent, our medium- to long- term earnings can be expected to follow the development in consumer and market prices, thereby protecting the real value of our assets and equity. This is the case for earnings related to our UK wind farms. However, we are exposed to inflation risk on projects with fixed nominal cash flows, as an increase in inflation will erode the expected real value of the revenue. This is the case for: – fixed nominal subsidies from offshore wind assets in Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Taiwan, and the US – fixed nominal power purchase agreements related to onshore wind assets in the US and offshore wind assets in Europe and Taiwan. The close relationship between inflation and interest rates protects our equity value against changes in interest rates to some extent. We manage interest rate and inflation risk by matching the sensitivity of our assets with the sensitivity of our debt. The share of our debt which is fixed in nominal terms partially offsets the inflation risk. We have fixed the inflation for part of the future revenue from our UK offshore wind farms at an average retail price index (RPI) rate of 3.6 % for the period 2024-2037 and an average consum- er price index (CPI) rate of 2.7 % for the period 2030-2032. This will create a better match with our fixed-rate UK debt. Offshore Earnings from power generation from offshore wind farms mainly comprise: – fixed tariffs in Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, the UK (CfD wind farms), the US, and Taiwan – guaranteed minimum prices for green certificates in the UK (ROC wind farms) – long-term power purchase agreements – sale of power at market price from our wind farms with market price risk. At the end of 2020, such fixed tariffs and guaranteed minimum prices cover approx. 86 % of the expected income from offshore wind farms for the period 2021-2025. The remaining price exposure concerns sales of power at market price in the UK, Denmark, and the Netherlands. Onshore Earnings from power generation from onshore wind farms in the US comprise tax incentives, such as PTCs or ITCs, and power. The tax incentives have a fixed value. However, there is a price risk associated with the power which is reduced by entering into power purchase agreements (PPAs). The current PPAs cover approx. 65 % of the expected generation, spanning 12-15 years from the commissioning of the wind farm. The PPAs are entered into with large corporates or financial institutions. Markets & Bioenergy Our combined heat and power plants consists of biomass- and fossil-fuelled plants in Denmark. Heat generation accounts for a larger share of the earnings and does not give rise to price risks, as the associated costs are covered by the heat customers. However, heat generation often entails a price risk for power, as heat and power are generated simulta- neously to a large extent. The profitability of power generation is determined by the difference between the selling price of power and the purchase price of fuel and carbon emission allowances. For our biomass-based power generation, we secure profitability by buying biomass at fixed prices and hedging the associated power generation. At the end of 2020, 36 % of the expected power generation from our power plants in 2021 was hedged. The total net risk associated with the power plants’ power generation for the 2021-2025 period is DKK 0.7 billion after hedging. Our price risks in Markets arise from the purchase and sale of power and gas. The price risks associated with the purchase and sale of gas result from differences in the indexing of sales and purchase prices. Our largest gas purchase contracts are mainly indexed to pure gas prices and thus no longer constitute a significant risk. The price risks associated with power purchases and sales are given by the difference between the purchase and sales prices. The price risk relates primarily to timing differences between purchases and sales and the related hedges and is therefore considered to be limited. Principles for estimating exposures Exposure is calculated as the expected production (or net purchase/sale) times the forward price for the respective years. In addition, the exposure is deter- mined on the basis of the expected exposure after renegotiations of oil-indexed gas purchase contracts. Offshore’s power price exposure, DKKbn Before hedging After hedging 4.2 3.0 3.0 3.2 4.7 3.7 1.9 0.1 0.3 0.6 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 The table shows the exposure from Offshore’s generation of power before and after hedges. Expected value for recognition in EBITDA, DKKbn Power Currency Inflation and interest US PPAs 1.7 0.1 0.2 2021 2022 After 2022 The table shows the time of the transfer of the value of hedging contracts in business performance EBITDA for both business performance and IFRS hedges together with deferred gains from US power purchase agreements (PPAs). See note 1.6 ‘Business performance’. 148 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 7. Risk management Notes Contents 7.2 Hedge accounting and economic hedging 2020 2019 2020 2019 Contractual principal amount Market value Economic hedging and commercial contracts, DKKm Note Overview of the Group’s derivative positions, DKKm 1.6, 7.2 Recognised with EBITDA impact Economic hedging, currency 1.6, 7.2 Economic hedging, energy 7.2 7.3 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 Hedging of cash flows, inflation Hedging of cash flows, energy Hedging of cash flows, currency Trading portfolio Total Recognised in financial income and expenses Hedging of fair value, currency Hedging of cash flows, currency, and interest Hedging of fair value, interests Other currency derivatives Other interest derivatives Total Recognised in other line items Hedging of cash flows, energy, and currency (gain/loss on divestment of enterprises) Hedging of fair value, currency (discontinued) Production assets Hedging of net investments (OCI) Total Contractual principal amount 30,403 18,740 19,709 11,857 - 12,995 93,704 Market value (575) (1,641) 1,209 (73) - 79 30,744 19,026 17,373 6,988 243 9,271 (1,001) 83,645 26,095 (1,166) 8,631 10,436 13,089 6,924 65,175 139 (13) 598 (156) (598) 25,825 3,890 - 8,052 4,431 42,198 4,435 (126) 10,487 (1,509) 617 585 545 (108) 1,148 1,278 43 (130) - 504 (85) 332 318 (50) - - 321 47,962 211,597 - 19 1,497 (209) 999 - 46,717 (1,096) 184,046 782 The table shows the Group’s derivatives and commer- cial contracts according to the type of accounting treatment and the items affected: – Economic hedging comprises hedging of energy- related risks and related currency risks. These hedging contracts are treated as hedge accounting in accordance with the business performance principle (see note 1.6 ‘Business performance’ for a detailed description). – Hedging of cash flows includes hedging of interest – Hedging of the market value of securities or currencies comprises hedging of recognised assets or liabilities. – Hedging of net investments comprises hedging of the currency risk associated with investments in assets located in foreign countries. – The trading portfolio and other interest and currency derivatives are recognised at market value in the income statement. rates, inflation, currencies, power prices, and market risks related to the divestment of the LNG business. The contractual principal amount has been deter- mined as the net position per derivative type. Energy Oil swaps Gas swaps Power swaps Power options Coal Total Currency Forward exchange contracts Total Economic hedging is accounted for under the business performance principle, see description above. The market value of DKK -2,216 million (2019: DKK -892 million) will be recognised in business performance profit or loss in a future period. Economic hedging and commercial contracts The purpose of economic hedging is to reduce our risk from generation and sale of energy. Fluctuations in value are expected to be offset by the underlying exposure. Contractual principal amount 604 2,012 9,008 7,111 5 Market value (13) 58 (1,795) 116 (7) 18,740 (1,641) Contractual principal amount Market value 993 3,180 10,523 4,193 137 19,026 56 770 (490) 317 (36) 617 30,403 49,143 (575) (2,216) 30,744 49,770 (1,509) (892) Accounting policies Economic hedging and commercial contracts Market value adjustments of financial contracts offered to customers with a view to price hedging and financial instruments that have been entered into to hedge the Group’s principal operating activities are recognised as revenue or cost of sales. Under the business performance principle, economic hedging is accounted for as effective hedging. The resulting market value adjustment is consequently deferred to the period when the hedged transaction affects results. See note 1.6 ‘Business performance’ for further information. The contractual principal amount has been determined as net position per derivative type. 149 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 7. Risk management Notes Contents Cash flow and fair value hedging Our cash-flow hedges consist of inflation, power, currency, interest rate, and oil hedges. Our fair hedges consist of currency and interest rate hedges. Ineffectiveness Ineffectiveness of cash flow and fair value hedging totalled DKK 0 million (2019: DKK 0 million). We do not experience ineffectiveness on our cashflow or fair value hedges as we are able to hedge the exposure with a hedge that fully match the exposure. However, ineffectiveness arise on our economic and commercial contracts where we are currently not applying IFRS hedge accounting. Cash flow hedge accounting 2020, DKKm Contractual principal amount Revenue (US+DE power) Revenue (UK inflation) Divestments (USD) Divestments (fixed interest) Production assets (oil) Production assets (USD) Interest payments (GBP) Interest payments (fixed) 2019, DKKm Revenue (US power) Revenue (USD) Revenue (UK inflation) Divestments (GBP) Divestments (USD) Divestments (oil) Divestments (gas) Interest payments (GBP) Interest payments (fixed) 11,857 19,709 1,098 3,337 238 83 1,635 6,996 6,988 116 17,373 127 3,518 3,442 3,527 2,310 1,580 Fair value hedge accounting 2020, DKKm Contractual principal amount GBP (sell position) EUR (sell position) NTD (sell position) Interest (fixed) 2019, DKKm GBP (sell position) EUR (sell position) NTD (sell position) USD (buy position) 17,359 4,466 4,270 10,436 18,688 4,483 2,654 999 Maturity analysis Market value 2022 After 2022 Asset Liability 2021 898 - 1,098 - 210 77 626 - 836 - - - 28 6 460 - 10,123 19,7091 - 3,337 - - 549 6,996 2020 2021 After 2021 499 115 - 127 433 556 503 576 25 615 1 - - 830 1,013 936 664 29 5,874 - 17,3731 - 2,255 1,873 2,088 1,070 1,526 583 1,231 98 - 27 23 34 147 824 120 585 96 158 74 534 37 - (656) (22) (19) (205) (2) (29) (42) - (279) (182) - (142) (37) (142) (269) (43) 124 Maturity analysis Market value 2021 (520) - - - 2020 (273) - - 999 2022 After 2022 Asset Liability - 4,466 - - 17,879 - 4,270 10,436 2021 After 2021 - - - - 18,961 4,483 2,654 - 93 - - - 33 17 1 - (1,128) - (131) (13) (8) - - (50) Recognised in comprehen- sive income 210 1,209 29 (205) 25 (6) 24 33 1,021 (41) 585 (4) - - - 43 (331) Expected transfers to income statement 2021 65 - 29 (205) 23 (6) (30) (34) 2020 46 (41) - (4) - - - (42) (59) 2022 After 2022 121 - - - 2 - 23 (25) 24 1,209 - - - - 31 92 2021 After 2021 46 - - - - - - 1 (55) 929 - 585 - - - - 84 (217) 1 The hedge covers inflation risks for the period 2024-2037. As of 1 January 2019, we have started to apply IFRS cash flow hedge accounting on power purchase agreements related to our Onshore business unit. The fair value hedges are related to hedges of loans and receivables in the balance sheet. Accounting policies We primarily use hedge accounting for currency, interest, and inflation where it is possible to use hedging instruments which hedge the desired risk one-to-one. The GBP exposure, for example, is hedged using GBP forward exchange contracts, GBP swaps, or GBP loans. Thus, there are no significant sources of ineffectiveness. For currency swaps, the basic spread is accounted for according to the cost of the hedging model. To the extent that a risk needs to be hedged, and if there is no fully effective instrument available in the market, analyses are performed of the expected effectiveness of the hedging instrument before the hedging transaction is concluded. In this case, the ratio between the hedged risk and the hedging instru- ment may deviate from the one-to-one principle and will be determined as the ratio which most effectively hedges the desired risk. We recognise changes to the market value of hedging instruments that qualify for recognition as a hedge of future cash flows in other comprehensive income in the hedging reserve. On realisation of the hedged cash flow, the resulting gains or losses are transferred from equity and recognised in the same item as the hedged item. However, on hedging of proceeds from future loans, the resulting gain or loss is transferred from equity over the term of the loan. When we conclude a hedging transaction, and each time we present financial statements thereafter, we assess whether the hedged exposure and the hedging instrument are still financially correlated. If the hedged cash flows are no longer expected to be realised, the accumulated value change is transferred to profit (loss) for the year. Changes in the market value of derivatives that are classified as hedges of the fair value of a recognised asset or liability are recognised in profit (loss) for the year together with changes in the value of the hedged asset or liability to the extent of the hedged risk. 150 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 7. Risk management Notes Contents Hedging of net investments in foreign subsidiaries Our foreign activities entail currency risk. We hedge this currency risk by raising loans in for- eign currencies and by entering into forward ex- change contracts, currency swaps and options. On 31 December 2020, the accumulated exchange rate adjustments totalled DKK -3,869 million, divided between the exchange rate adjustment of the net investment of DKK -4,793 million and the hedging thereof of DKK 924 million. Accounting policies Hedging of net investments in foreign subsidiaries Changes in the market value of derivatives and loans that are classified as net investment hedges in for- eign subsidiaries or associates are recognised in the consolidated financial statements directly in equity within a separate foreign currency translation reserve. Hedging of net investments in foreign subsidiaries, DKKm Currency 2020 GBP EUR USD NTD Other Total 2019 GBP EUR USD NTD Other Total Net investment Of which, non- controlling interests Hedged amount in currency Net position Accumulated exchange rate adjustments in equity 56,826 24,550 17,317 11,409 232 110,334 62,600 22,501 15,979 3,061 122 104,263 (2,705) - - - - (2,705) (3,292) - - - - (3,292) (33,949) (4,466) (5,277) (4,270) - (47,962) (35,284) (4,483) (4,296) (2,654) - (46,717) 20,172 20,084 12,040 7,139 232 59,667 24,024 18,018 11,683 407 122 54,254 (3,014) (33) (899) 121 (44) (3,869) (1,165) 38 139 (3) (66) (1,057) The net position expresses the accounting exposure. If, for example, the GBP/ DKK exchange rate increased by 10 % on 31 December 2020, equity would have increased by DKK 2,017 million, corresponding to 10 % of DKK 20,172 million. Net investment hedges 2020, DKKm Contractual principal amount GBP (sell position) EUR (sell position) USD (sell position) NTD (sell position) 2019, DKKm GBP (sell position) EUR (sell position) USD (sell position) NTD (sell position) 33,949 4,466 5,277 4,270 35,284 4,483 4,296 2,654 Maturity analysis Market value 2021 4,998 - (4,122) - 2020 2,950 - (1,548) - 2022 After 2022 Asset Liability 5,830 4,466 4,807 - 23,121 - 4,593 4,270 2021 After 2021 3,104 - 2,429 - 29,230 4,483 3,415 2,654 1,054 - 401 131 (89) - - - 149 4 36 - (1,195) (21) (68) (1) Hornsea 1, off the Yorkshire coast, the UK. 151 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 7. Risk management Notes Contents 7.3 Energy trading portfolio Trading portfolio The purpose of our trading portfolio is to: – optimise hedging contracts – contribute to increased market insight – profit from short-term fluctuations in energy prices. The trading portfolio consists primarily of positions in power and gas. Other Total Power swaps Power options Gas swaps and options Oil swaps and options Overview of the Group’s trading portfolio, DKKm Contractual principal amount Market value Contractual principal amount Market value 2020 2019 3,225 7,208 1,645 548 369 12,995 341 (80) (24) (150) (8) 79 3,174 4,155 1,467 141 334 9,271 725 (339) 720 14 28 1,148 The trading portfolio constitutes a smaller part of our total portfolio of derivatives, and the associated risk is limited. When an economic hedging instrument (business performance hedge) does not fully correspond to the hedged risk, any difference between the hedging contract entered into and the hedged exposure is recognised in the income statement as part of the gain (loss) from the trading portfolio. Market trading mandates VaR limit in 2020: DKK 70 million Stress limit in 2020: DKK 400 million Maximum open positions in trading portfolio VaR indicates the largest loss in one trading day at a probability of 95 %. VaR is based on data for the past 60 trading days, with the heaviest weighting being assigned to the most recent trading days. Stress indicates the largest daily loss we risk sustaining with the given portfolio. Stress is based on data from 1 January 2006 to the present day. – Max. 8 TWh of power – Max. 15 TWh of gas – Max. 4 million boe of oil – Max. 2 million tonnes of coal – Max. 3 million tonnes of carbon emissions Accounting policies Board of Directors mandate Executive Committee mandate VaR (value at risk) Daily position in the trading portfolio, market trading mandates, DKKm The contractual principal amount has been determined as the net position per derivative type. The risk associated with our options is smaller than for our swaps. Trading activities are carried out within mandates approved by the Board of Directors. The mandates comprise a value-at-risk (VaR) mandate and a stress mandate as well as a limit for the maximum positions measured in energy units per product (power, gas, etc.). Market value adjustments of physical and financial contracts relating to energy that are entered into with the purpose of generating gains from short-term price changes are recognised as revenue. 80 60 40 20 0 2019 2020 The graph shows the daily value-at-risk position for the period 2019-2020. VaR reached DKK 56 million on 8 January 2020, causing a passive breach of the Executive Committee mandate of DKK 50 million. This was due to increased volatility as a conse- quence of the Russian/Ukraine conflict and the Iranian attack on US bases on 8 January. The risk was brought back within the limit the next day. 152 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 7. Risk management Notes Contents 7.4 Sensitivity analysis of financial instruments The sensitivity analysis in the table shows the effect of market value changes, assuming a relative price change at 31 December 2020. Sensitivity analysis of financial instruments DKKm 31 December 2020 31 December 2019 Effect on profit (loss) before tax Price change Trading portfolio Other financial instruments1 Effect on equity before tax Effect on profit (loss) before tax Trading portfolio Other financial instruments1 Effect on equity before tax Risk Oil Gas Power USD GBP NTD EUR The effect on profit (loss) before tax com- prises financial instruments that remained open at the balance sheet date, and which have an effect on profit (loss) in the current financial year. The effect is broken down by: – trading portfolio: these contracts will affect profit – other financial instruments, including economic hedging and commercial contracts: the market value changes of contracts allocated as economic hedges will be offset, in full or in part, by a change in the hedged risk. Effect on equity before tax comprises finan- cial instruments that remained open at the balance sheet date, and which are value- adjusted directly in equity. Financial instruments include derivatives as well as receivables and payables in foreign currencies. 10 % -10 % 10 % -10 % 10 % -10 % 10 % -10 % 10 % -10 % 10 % -10 % 1 % -1 % (273) 273 (218) 217 247 (238) (112) 112 118 (118) 74 (74) (31) 31 (276) - 12 (12) (57) 57 (1,403) 1,396 50 (50) (2,948) 2,948 64 (64) (89) 89 - - 26 (26) - - (1,571) 1,114 (281) 281 155 (155) - - (82) 82 1,281 (2,671) (423) 423 (22) 22 540 (556) (126) 126 68 (68) - - (26) 26 (268) - 106 (106) (169) 169 (1,334) 1,350 81 (81) (2,539) 2,539 53 (53) (31) 31 - - 335 (335) (328) 328 (827) 827 135 (135) 119 (119) - - (31) 31 159 (1,937) Interest 100 basis points Inflation 100 basis points The illustrated sensitivities only comprise the impacts from our financial instruments. If the hedged exposure had been included in the sensitivity analysis, the effect of a price change would have been reduced or offset entirely. Net investments and associated hedging of net investments in foreign subsidiaries are not included in the table, as the effect of the sum of the investment and the hedging are considered to be neutral to changes in currencies. A 10 % increase in the currencies hedged in connection with net investments would reduce equity by DKK 4,796 million (2019: DKK 4,672 million). 1 Other financial instruments, including derivatives classified as economic hedging, comprise derivatives entered into to hedge future financial risks. The market value changes of these con- tracts will be offset, in full or in part, by a change in the hedged risk. Also included are commercial contracts recognised at market value. 153 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 7. Risk management Notes Contents 7.5 Credit risks We are exposed to credit risks from our trading partners and customers. A large part of our counterparty risks concerns major international energy companies and banks. Such trading is regulated under standard agreements, such as EFET and ISDA agreements, which feature, for instance, credit rating and netting provisions. Our credit exposure is mainly concentrated on counterparties in Denmark, the UK, Germany, and the US. We limit our credit risks by: – systematically rating significant counterparties – granting credit limits – demanding that collateral be furnished, or credit insurance put in place. The counterparties and credit limits granted are monitored on an ongoing basis. The monitoring is based on the framework established by our Board of Directors and the Executive Committee. For the most significant counterparties, an internal rating is required to determine credit limits. The rating is based on information from external credit rating agencies, publicly available information, and our own analyses. We have not suffered losses from any single major counterparty in 2019 or 2020. The credit risks from our financial assets prima- rily concern derivatives, cash, securities, and receivables. The assessment is based on the individual counterparty’s ratings with Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, and Fitch. The figures do not reflect our actual credit exposure, as the positions are calculated before offsetting our debt to such counterparties. Credit quality of the Group’s counterparties, DKKm AAA/Aaa AA/Aa A/A BBB/Baa Non-rated Accounting policies Total credit exposure We only offset positive and negative values if we are entitled to and intend to settle several financial instruments net. 2020 21,498 1,712 9,149 3,717 9,602 45,678 2019 9,221 4,000 11,593 5,284 12,246 42,344 The AAA/Aaa category covers our position in Danish AAA-rated gov- ernment and mortgage bonds. The non-rated category primarily con- sists of trade receivables from customers, such as end-users. Offsetting of financial assets, DKKm Derivatives Financial assets Financial liabilities, offset Financial assets in the balance sheet Amounts not offset in the balance sheet: Liabilities with offsetting rights Collateral received Net 9,302 (4,467) 4,835 (1,859) (12) 2,964 Offsetting of financial liabilities, DKKm Derivatives Financial liabilities Financial assets, offset Financial liabilities in the balance sheet Amounts not offset in the balance sheet: Assets with offsetting rights Collateral provided Net 8,848 (4,467) 4,381 (1,859) (2,295) 227 Trade receivables 13,655 (11,842) 1,813 - - 1,813 Trade payables 13,898 (11,842) 2,056 - - 2,056 2020 Derivatives 22,957 (16,309) 6,648 (1,859) (12) 4,777 12,174 (6,917) 5,257 (2,044) (1,438) 1,775 2020 Derivatives 22,746 (16,309) 6,437 (1,859) (2,295) 2,283 13,108 (6,917) 6,191 (2,044) (331) 3,816 Trade receivables 17,219 (13,767) 3,452 - - 3,452 Trade payables 16,764 (13,767) 2,997 - - 2,997 2019 29,393 (20,684) 8,709 (2,044) (1,438) 5,227 2019 29,872 (20,684) 9,188 (2,044) (331) 6,813 The table shows our financial assets and liabilities where a share is offset and is therefore presented net. Offset- ting is typically limited to specific products. 154 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 7. Risk management Notes Contents 7.6 Categories of financial instruments Financial instruments are used for various purposes. The purpose determines the category, and whether the value adjustment of the instrument should be recognised in the profit (loss) for the year or as part of the hedging reserve in equity. The fair value of financial instruments measured at amortised cost is identical to the carrying amount with the excep- tion of bank loans and issued bonds where the market value is stated in note 6.1 ‘ Interest-bearing debt’. The table shows our financial instruments divided into categories. The categories indicate how the financial instru- ments are recognised in the financial statement. Categories of financial instruments, DKKm Energy and currency derivatives Securities Financial assets measured at fair value via the income statement Energy derivatives Interest and inflation derivatives Currency derivatives Derivatives (assets) used as hedging instruments Trade receivables Other accounts receivable Financial assets measured at amortised cost Energy and currency derivatives Financial liabilities measured at fair value via the income statement Energy derivatives Interest and inflation derivatives Currency derivatives Derivatives (liabilities) used as hedging instruments Bank loans and issued bonds Trade payables Other accounts payable Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost 2020 2,856 25,173 28,029 610 1,378 1,265 3,253 6,732 8,317 15,049 4,538 4,538 658 240 864 1,762 36,766 9,742 4,282 50,790 Drone delivery of tools at Borssele 1 & 2, Vlissingen, the Netherlands. 2019 5,072 16,552 21,624 1,432 585 651 2,668 8,140 11,941 20,081 4,397 4,397 690 124 1,747 2,561 36,840 10,832 2,595 50,267 155 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 7. Risk management Notes Contents 7.7 Fair value measurement We measure our securities and derivatives at fair value. A number of our derivatives, mainly power purchase agreements, are measured based on non-observable inputs. The most significant non-observable input is the long- term US power price, due to the long duration of the contracts. Valuation principles and key assumptions In order to minimise the use of subjective esti- mates or modifications of parameters and cal- culation models, it is our policy to determine fair values based on the external information that most accurately reflects the market values. We use pricing services and benchmark services to increase the data quality. Market values are determined by the Treasury & Risk Management function which reports to the CFO. The development in market values is monitored on a continuing basis and reported to the Executive Committee. Deferred gain/losses from US power purchase agreements The deferred gains from US PPAs consist of the market value of PPAs recocognised in the opening balance when Lincoln Clean Energy was purchased in 2018. The PPAs lock the power price of the expected power in generation over a period of 13-15 years. These contracts are accounted for at fair value. Due to the long duration of these PPAs, power prices are not observable for the last part of the duration. The deferred revenue is recognised in profit or loss in the future period to which the market value relates. In 2020, we have recognised an income of DKK 184 million (2019: DKK 216 million) related to the deferred fair value of PPAs not recog- nised in profit or loss at initial recognition. The total amount of deferred revenue as of 31 December 2020 amounts to DKK 736 million (2019: DKK 995 million). US power prices (ERCOT) The US power purchase agreements give exposure to the long-term US power prices in the ERCOT region. The price is observable for the first four to six years. For the following four to six years, the power price is estimated based on observable inputs (gas prices and heat rates). For the short subsequent period, the power price is non-observable and estimated by extrapolating the power price towards the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s long-term power price forecast, assuming similar seasonality as in previous periods. As only a minor part of the contract period is within the period where power prices are non- observable, we classify the contracts as based on observable input. Fair value hierarchy, DKKm Inventories Derivatives Other receivables Securities Derivatives Other payables Assets Liabilities 2020 Quoted prices Observable input Non-observable input Total 2020 2019 Quoted prices Observable input Non-observable input Total 2019 1,388 - - 1,388 959 - - 959 2,074 3,627 408 6,109 16 7,467 257 7,740 - - - - - - - - - 25,173 - 25,173 - 16,552 - 16,552 2,294 3,534 490 6,318 21 6,916 21 6,958 - - - - - - - - Significant non-observable inputs Market values based on non-observable input comprise primarily long-term contracts on the purchase or sale of power and gas. Since there are no active markets for the long-term prices of power and gas, the market values have been determined through an estimate of the future prices. Normally, the price can be observed for a maximum of four to six years in the power market, after which an active market no longer exists. Accounting policies Market values based on quoted prices comprise quoted securities and derivatives that are traded in active markets. The market value of derivatives traded in an active market are often settled on a daily basis, thereby minimising the market value presented on the balance sheet. Market values based on observable inputs comprise derivatives where valuation models with observable inputs are used to measure fair value. All assets and liabilities measured at market value are measured on a recurring basis. In business combinations, gain (loss) at initial recognition on derivatives whose values are based on non-observable inputs are deferred and recog- nised in the period to which the value relates. 156 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 7. Risk management Notes Contents Derivatives valued on the basis of non-observable input, DKKm Market value at 1 January Value adjustments through profit or loss Value adjustments through other comprehensive income Sales/redemptions Purchases/issues Transferred from quoted prices and observable input Transferred to quoted prices and observable input Market value at 31 December Non-observable inputs per commodity price input, DKKm German power prices Other power prices Gas prices Total The main non-observable input is German power prices in the period 2025-2034. The average power price for the period is estimated at EUR 54 per MWh, based on an inflation-adjusted extrapolation of the observable price. An increase or decrease in the German power prices of 10 % would impact the fair value by +/- DKK 400 million. 2020 236 (21) (228) (37) 56 15 (103) (82) 2020 (228) (21) 167 (82) 2019 (2,458) 289 955 20 97 - 1,333 236 2019 - 221 15 236 Borssele 1 & 2, Vlissingen, the Netherlands. 157 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Notes Contents 8. Other notes 159 Related-party transactions 160 Leases 161 Auditor’s fees 161 Contractual obligations 162 Company overview Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 8. Other notes Notes Contents 8.1 Related-party transactions Related parties that have control over the Group comprise the Danish state, represented by the Danish Ministry of Finance. Other related parties are the Group’s associ- ates and joint ventures, members of the Board of Directors and the Executive Board as well as other senior executives. See note 8.5 ‘Company overview’ for an over- view of our joint ventures and associates. Related-party transactions are made on arm’s length terms. Intra-group transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. The remuneration and share programmes for the Executive Committee and the Board of Directors are described in notes 2.7 ‘ Employee costs’ and 2.8 ‘Share-based payment’. Through a directly owned company, Peter Korsholm, board member, has had ordin ary transactions with Danish Oil Pipe A/S, a wholly-owned subsidiary in the Ørsted Group. We use the exemption set out in IAS 24.25 concerning entities in which the Danish state is a related party, and therefore transactions with government-related companies are not disclosed. Joint ventures, DKKm Dividends received and capital reductions Capital transactions, net Sale of goods and services Purchase of goods and services Receivables Payables Associates, DKKm Dividends received and capital reductions Capital transactions, net Sale of goods and services Purchase of goods and services There were no other related-party trans- actions during the period. Payables Receivables Board of Directors, DKKm Purchase of goods and services Payables East Coast Hub, at the Port of Grimsby, Lincolnshire, the UK. 2020 6 65 - - - (5) 14 (45) 11 (156) (17) - (21) - 2019 - (118) 3 (6) 1 - - (46) 13 (130) (18) 1 (107) (11) 159 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 8. Other notes Notes Contents Accounting policies Carrying amount at 31 December 2020 8.2 Leases Our lease liabilities decreased by DKK 278 million relative to 31 December 2019. Additions primarily related to commenced leases of plots of land related to development and construction projects in Onshore. We have entered into leases of DKK 368 million which are not commenced and consequently not included in our lease liabilities. Offshore’s leases mainly comprise seabeds related to the offshore wind farms in the UK and US and service vessels. Onshore’s leases comprise plots of land related to onshore wind farms. Markets & Bioenergy mainly lease gas storage facilities in Germany. Leased assets recognised under ‘Other activ i- ties’ mainly comprise our two office premises in Gentofte and London. The premises are used by employees from all of our business units. Seabed leases include variable lease pay- ments which depend on the number of mega- watt hours generated. However, we have typically agreed on minimum lease payments for the seabeds, and these minimum pay- ments are included in the lease liabilities. Expenses for the year relating to variable lease payments not included in lease liabil- ities amounted to DKK 411 million in 2020 (2019: DKK 311 million). Interests on lease debt expensed in profit (loss) were DKK 177 million in 2020 (2019: DKK 171 million). Total cash outflows for leases were DKK 1,129 million in 2020 (2019: DKK 1,147 million). Our lease liabilities are initially measured at the net present value of the in-substance fixed lease payments for the use of a lease asset. If, at inception of the lease, we are reasonably certain about exercising an option to extend a lease, we will include the lease payments in the option period when calculating the lease liability. We measure the lease asset to the value of the lease liability at initial recognition. Our lease assets are classified alongside our owned assets of similar type under property, plant, and equipment. We depreciate our lease assets during the lease term. The depreciation method used is the straight-line method for all our lease assets, except for seabed leases where the depreciation method is aligned with the depreciation method for the related offshore wind farm. Therefore, seabed lease assets are depreciated by using either the straight-line method or the reducing-fraction method. Contracts may contain both lease and non-lease com- ponents. We allocate the consideration in a contract to the lease and non-lease components based on their relative stand-alone prices. We account for non-lease components in accordance with the accounting policy applicable for such items. Non-lease components comprise building services and operating costs of leased vessels, etc. Variable lease expenses are recognised in other external expenses in the period when the condition triggering those payments occurs. Interests of lease liabilities are recognised in financial expenses. Each lease payment is separated into repayment of the lease liability and payment of interests of the lease liability. Debt repayments are classified as cash flows from financing activities, and payment of interests are classified as cash flows from operating activities. Land and buildings Production assets Fixtures and fittings, tools, and equipment Property, plant, and equipment Lease assets, DKKm Carrying amount at 1 January 2020 Exchange rate adjustments Additions Disposals Divestment of enterprises Depreciation Lease assets, DKKm Carrying amount at 1 January 2019 Exchange rate adjustments Additions Disposals Depreciation Carrying amount at 31 December 2019 4,407 (226) 775 (133) (239) (310) 4,274 4,165 131 535 (61) (363) 4,407 476 (7) - (234) - (63) 172 440 1 109 - (74) 476 308 (4) 79 - - (213) 170 460 5 5 - (162) 308 Lease liabilities by segment 2020, DKKm Offshore Onshore Markets & Bioenergy Other activities 0-1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years 5-10 years 10-15 years After 15 years Total (non-discounted) Carrying amount at 31 December 2020 Lease liabilities by segment 2019, DKKm 0-1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years 5-10 years 10-15 years After 15 years Total (non-discounted) Carrying amount at 31 December 2019 299 583 314 602 477 360 2,635 2,160 280 475 348 709 607 525 2,944 2,432 51 245 156 409 463 1,549 2,873 1,386 45 87 93 236 259 1,016 1,736 864 86 113 23 40 28 9 299 270 89 185 41 44 - 66 425 368 163 321 320 581 18 - 1,403 1,238 199 224 287 1,224 26 14 1,974 1,668 5,191 (237) 854 (367) (239) (586) 4,616 5,065 137 649 (61) (599) 5,191 Total 599 1,262 813 1,632 986 1,918 7,210 5,054 613 971 769 2,213 892 1,621 7,079 5,332 160 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 8. Other notes Notes Contents 8.3 Auditor’s fees 8.4 Contractual obligations Tax and VAT advice primarily included advice in connection with tax due diligence and advice in connection with the preparation of tax returns and employee taxation. Other services included other consultancy services from PwC, including advice in connec- tion with accounting, GDPR, and due diligence. Our contractual obligations at 31 December 2020 mainly related to offshore wind tur- bines, foundations, and cables, etc., for the construction of offshore wind farms (primarily Greater Changhua 1 & 2a and Hornsea 2). We have reduced the obligations significantly relative to the last year due to the completion of Borssele 1 & 2 and progress on wind farms under construction. The obligations in Onshore mainly related to purchases of onshore wind turbines and solar PV modules. Lease liabilities are not part of the contractual obligations. See note 8.2 ‘Leases’. PwC is Ørsted’s auditor appointed by the annual general meeting. PwC audits the consolidated financial statements of Ørsted and our subsidiaries’ financial statements in all the countries where we are represented. It is our policy that the annual fee for non- audit services provided by our statutory auditor cannot exceed the annual fee for statutory audit services measured at Group level. The cap may be exceeded subject to approval by the Audit & Risk Committee. Other assurance engagements primarily included reviews of ESG data, assurance services related to the issuance of bonds, and reviews of regulatory financial statements. Fees for services other than statutory audit supplied by PwC Denmark to Ørsted amount- ed to DKK 4 million (2019: DKK 6 million) and consisted of assurance services related to the issuance of bonds, reviews of regulatory finan- cial statements, accounting and tax advice in connection with divestment of assets and enterprises, GDPR, due diligence, review of ESG data, and other general accounting and tax advice. Auditor’s fees, DKKm Audit and audit-related fees Statutory audit Other assurance engagements Non-audit services Tax and VAT advice Other services Total fees to PwC Fee for non-audit services in percent of statutory audit fee PwC Denmark non-audit service ratio 2020 2019 17 2 3 2 24 39 % 56 % 16 2 2 4 24 47 % n.a. Effective from 1 January 2020, the non-audit services provided by the Group auditor in Denmark cannot exceed 70 %. Contractual obligations by segment, DKKm Offshore Onshore 0-1 year 1-5 years 2020 2019 1,761 40,311 42,072 50,815 1,689 - 1,689 1,327 Markets & Bioenergy 29 40 69 209 Total 3,479 40,351 43,830 52,351 Overview of contracts entered into where delivery had not taken place at 31 December 2020. The obligations are measured at nominal value. 161 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 8. Other notes Notes Contents 8.5 Company overview Segment/company/registered office Parent company Ørsted A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Offshore AB Baltic Grid, Malmö, Sweden Acceber B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Anholt Havvindmøllepark I/S2,3, Fredericia, Denmark Barrow Offshore Wind Limited, London, the UK Bay State HoldCo LLC, Delaware, the US Bay State Wind LLC2, Delaware, the US Bearsonville Investments sp. z o.o., soon Orsted Polska OF SPV 1 sp. z o.o., Warzaw, Poland Blue Champion B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Boreas B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Borkum Riffgrund I Holding A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Borkum Riffgrund I Offshore Windpark A/S GmbH & Co. oHG, Norden, Germany Borkum Riffgrund 2 Holding GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Borkum Riffgrund 2 Offshore Wind Farm GmbH & Co. oHG, Norden, Germany Borkum Riffgrund 3 GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Borssele Wind Farm C.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Breesea Limited, London, the UK BSW Holdco LLC2, Delaware, the US BSW Projectco LLC2, Delaware, the US Burbo Extension Holding Ltd, London, the UK Burbo Extension Ltd2, London, the UK Calgary Flames B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Celtic Array Limited2, Berkshire, the UK Cerulea Limited, London, the UK Choshi Orsted HoldCo G.K., Tokyo, Japan Type1 Ownership interest Segment/company/registered office Choshi Offshore Wind Farm K.K., Toyko, Japan - S S JO S JO JO S S S S JO S JO S S S JO JO JO JO S JV S S - CT Offshore A/S under frivillig likvidation, Fredericia, Denmark Cygnus Wind Transmission Limited, London, the UK Deepwater Wind, LLC2, Delaware, the US Deepwater Wind Block Island, LLC, Delaware, the US Deepwater Wind Block Island Holdings, LLC5, Delaware, the US Deepwater Wind Block Island Transmission, LLC, Delaware, the US Deepwater Wind New England2, LLC, Delaware, the US Deepwater Wind New Jersey, LLC, Delaware, the US Deepwater Wind New York2, LLC, Delaware, the US Deepwater Wind Operating2, LLC, Delaware, the US Deepwater Wind Rhode Island, LLC, Delaware, the US DWBI Class B member, LLC, Delaware, the US DWW MARI Holdings, LLC2, Delaware, the US Euros B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Endalan Investments sp. z o.o., soon Orsted Polska OF SPV 2 sp. z o.o., Warzaw, Poland Formosa I International Investment Co., Limited, Taipei City, Taiwan Formosa I Wind Power Co.2, Ltd, Taipei City, Taiwan Garden State Offshore Energy, LLC, Delaware, the US Gavota B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Gode Wind 1 Offshore Wind Farm GmbH & Co. oHG, Norden, Germany Gode Wind 2 Offshore Wind Farm P/S GmbH & Co. oHG, Norden, Germany Gode Wind 3 GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Golden Melody B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Gotland Offshore Windfarm AB, Malmö, Sweden Greater Changhua Offshore Wind Farm NW Ltd., Changhua County, Taiwan Greater Changhua Offshore Wind Farm SE Ltd., Changhua County, Taiwan 100 % 100 % 50 % 100 % 50 % 50 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 50 % 100 % 50 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 50 % 50 % 50 % 50 % 100 % 50 % 100 % 100 % Type1 Ownership interest S S S JO S S S JO S JO JO S S JO S S JV JV JV S JO JO S S S S S 100 % 100 % 100 % 50 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 50 % 100 % 50 % 50 % 100 % 100 % 50 % 100 % 100 % 35 % 35 % 50 % 100 % 50 % 50 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 162 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 8. Other notes Notes Contents Segment/company/registered office Greater Changhua SE Holdings Ltd., Changhua County, Taiwan Greater Changhua Offshore Wind Farm SW Ltd., Changhua County, Taiwan GSOE I, LLC2, Delaware, the US Gunfleet Sands Holding Ltd., London, the UK Gunfleet Sands II Limited2, London, the UK Gunfleet Sands Limited2, London, the UK Hocadio Investments sp. z o.o., soon Orsted Polska OF SPV 3 sp. z o.o., Warzaw, Poland Horns Rev I Offshore Wind Farm6 Hornsea 1 Holdings Limited, London, the UK Hornsea 1 Limited2, London, the UK Lincs Wind Farm (Holding) Limited, London, the UK Lincs Wind Farm Limited2, Aberdeen, the UK London Array Limited, Kent, the UK Merndale Investments sp. z o.o., soon Orsted Polska OF SPV 4 sp. z o.o. Morecambe Wind Limited, London, the UK Njord Limited2, London, the UK North East Offshore, LLC, Delaware, the US Northeast Wind Energy LLC, Delaware , the US Notos B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Nysted I A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Nördlicher Grund GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Ocean Wind LLC, Delaware, the US Ocean Wind II, LLC, Delaware, the US Ocean Wind JV HoldCo, LLC, Delaware, the US OFTRAC Limited, London, the UK Optimus Wind Limited, London, the UK Optimus Wind Transmission Limited, London, the UK Orsted Baltica 2 Holding sp. z o.o., Warzaw, Poland Orsted Baltica 3 Holding sp. z o.o., Warzaw, Poland Orsted Borkum Riffgrund I GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Orsted Borkum Riffgrund I HoldCo GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Type1 Ownership interest Segment/company/registered office Type1 Ownership interest S S JV S S S S JO JO JO JO JO JO S JO S JO JO S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 % Orsted Borssele 1 B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands 100 % Orsted Borssele Holding B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands 50 % 50 % 50 % 50 % Orsted Burbo (UK) Limited, London, the UK Orsted Burbo Extension Holding Ltd, London, the UK Orsted Gode Wind 1 Holding GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Orsted Gode Wind 2 GmbH, Hamburg, Germany 100 % Orsted Greater Changhua SE Holdings Ltd., Changhua County, Taiwan 40 % 50 % 50 % 25 % 25 % 25 % Orsted Gunfleet Sands Demo (UK), Ltd, London, the UK Orsted HKN Holding B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Orsted Hornsea 1 Holdings Limited, London, the UK Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited, London, the UK Orsted Hornsea Project Three (UK) Limited, London, the UK Orsted InvestCo Limited, Taipei City, Taiwan 100 % Orsted Isle of Man (UK) Limited, Isle of Man 50 % 50 % 50 % 50 % Orsted Japan K.K., Tokyo, Japan Orsted Korea Limited, Seoul, South Korea Orsted Lincs (UK) Ltd., London, the UK Orsted London Array II Limited, London, the UK 100 % Orsted London Array Limited, London, the UK 86 % Orsted North America Inc., Delaware, the US 100 % Orsted Ocean Wind HoldCo, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Orsted Pipeline HoldCo G.K., Tokyo, Japan 100 % Orsted Pipeline ProjectCo K.K., Tokyo, Japan 100 % Orsted Polska OF Services sp. z o.o., Warzaw, Poland 100 % Orsted Power (Gunfleet Sands) Ltd, London, the UK 100 % Orsted Power (Participation) Ltd, London, the UK 100 % Orsted Power (UK) Limited, London, the UK 100 % Orsted Race Bank (Holding) Limited, London, the UK 100 % Orsted Shell Flats (UK) Limited, London, the UK 100 % Orsted Singapore Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Republic of Singapore 100 % Orsted Speicher R GmbH, Hamburg, Germany S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 163 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 8. Other notes Notes Contents Segment/company/registered office Orsted Taiwan Ltd., Taipei City, Taiwan Orsted UK III Limited, London, the UK Orsted US East Coast Offshore Wind Holdco, LLC, Delaware, the US Orsted Walney Extension Holdings Limited, London, the UK Orsted West of Duddon Sands (UK) Limited, London, the UK Orsted Westermost Rough Limited, London, the UK Orsted Wind Power Germany GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Orsted Wind Power Netherlands B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Orsted Wind Power Netherlands Holding B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Orsted Wind Power North America LLC, Delaware, the US Preparatory Office of Greater Changhua Offshore Wind Farm NE Ltd., Changhua County, Taiwan Preparatory Office of Wo Neng 1 Offshore Wind Farm Ltd. Preparatory Office of Wo Neng 2 Offshore Wind Farm Ltd. Preparatory Office of Wo Neng 3 Offshore Wind Farm Ltd. Preparatory Office of Wo Neng 4 Offshore Wind Farm Ltd. Preparatory Office of Xu Feng 1 Offshore Wind Farm Ltd. Preparatory Office of Xu Feng 2 Offshore Wind Farm Ltd. Preparatory Office of Xu Feng 3 Offshore Wind Farm Ltd. Preparatory Office of Xu Feng 4 Offshore Wind Farm Ltd. Race Bank Wind Farm (Holding) Limited2, London, the UK Race Bank Wind Farm Limited2, London, the UK Revolution Wind, LLC2, Delaware, the US Rhiannon Wind Farm Limited2, Windsor, the UK Scarweather Sands Limited, Coventry, the UK Scranford Investments sp. z o.o., soon Orsted Polska OF SPV 5 sp. z o.o, Delaware, the US Skipjack Offshore Energy, LLC, Delaware, the US Skåne Offshore Windfarm AB SMart Wind Limited, London, the UK SMRT Line, LLC2, Delaware, the US Sonningmay Wind Limited, London, the UK Type1 Ownership interest Segment/company/registered office Type1 Ownership interest S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S JO JO JO JV JV S S S S JO S 100 % Soundmark Wind Limited, London, the UK 100 % South Fork Wind, LLC2, Delaware, the US 100 % Sunrise Wind, LLC2, Delaware, the US 100 % Tasalot Investments sp. z o.o., soon Orsted Polska OF SPV 6 sp. z o.o., Warzaw, Poland 100 % UMBO GmbH, Hamburg, Germany 100 % Valmarindo Investments sp. z o.o., soon Orsted Polska OF SPV 7 sp. z o.o., Warzaw, Poland 100 % Varinas B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands 100 % VI Aura Transmission Limited, London, the UK 100 % Walney (UK) Offshore Windfarms Limited, London, the UK 100 % Walney Extension Holdings Limited, London, the UK 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 50 % 50 % 50 % 50 % 50 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 50 % 100 % Walney Extension Limited2 , London, the UK West of Duddon Sands6 , London, the UK Westermost Rough (Holding) Limited, London, the UK Westermost Rough Limited2 , London, the UK Zadivo Investments sp. z o.o., soon Orsted Polska OF SPV 8 sp. z o.o., Warzaw, Poland Zephyrus B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Ørsted - Anholt Offshore A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Horns Rev I A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Horns Rev 2 A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Hydrogen Green Fuels DK A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Japan Holding A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Nearshore Wind ApS, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted VE A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Vind A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Wind Power A/S4, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Wind Power Denmark A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Wind Power Holding A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Onshore 2W Permian Solar, LLC, Delaware, the US 2W Permian Class B Member, LLC, Delaware, the US 2W Permian Holdco, LLC, Delaware, the US S JO JO S JV S S S S JO JO JO JO JO S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 % 50 % 50 % 100 % 90 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 50 % 50 % 50 % 50 % 50 % 50 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 164 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 8. Other notes Notes Contents Segment/company/registered office Antelope Flats Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US Armadillo Solar Center, LLC, Delaware, the US Badger Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US Barranca Wind Energy, LLC, Delaware, the US Barranca Wind Energy II, LLC, Delaware, the US Bauer Solar, LLC, Delaware, the US Bedford Solar Center, LLC, Virginia, the US Bowen Solar Center, LLC, Mississippi, the US Cabin Point Solar Center, LLC, Virginia, the US Camino Solar Center, LLC, New Mexico, the US Canutillo Energy Center, LLC, Texas, the US Casper Solar Center, LLC, Virginia, the US Coolidge Solar Center, LLC, Arizona, the US Dermott Wind Class B Holdco, LLC, Delaware, the US Dermott Wind Class B Member, LLC, Delaware, the US Dermott Wind, LLC5, Delaware, the US Dunbar Solar, LLC, Delaware, the US Emerick Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US Eastern Trail Solar Center, LLC, Delaware, the US Firefly Solar Center, LLC, Delaware, the US Frog Solar Center, LLC, Virginia, the US Garland Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US Geranium Solar, LLC, Delaware, the US Goose Solar Center, LLC, Texas, the US Happy Hollow Solar Center, LLC, Georgia, the US Haystack Owner, LLC, Delaware, the US Haystack Wind Project, LLC, Delaware, the US Helena Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US Helena Wind Holdco, LLC, Delaware, the US Holland Solar, LLC, Delaware, the US Holloman Solar Center, LLC, North Carolina, the US Type1 Ownership interest Segment/company/registered office Type1 Ownership interest S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 % Jones Solar Center, LLC, Florida, the US 100 % Live Oak Solar Center, LLC, Florida, the US 100 % Lockett Windfarm Class B Member, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Lockett Windfarm Project Holdings, LLC5, Delaware, the US 100 % Lockett Windfarm LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Lux Solar Center, LLC, Nevada, the US 100 % Madden Solar Center, LLC, Georgia, the US 100 % Mastodon Solar Center, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % McAlpin Solar Center, LLC, Florida, the US 100 % Michaux Solar Center, LLC, Virginia, the US 100 % Mineola Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Mockingbird Solar Center, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Muscle Shoals Land Holdings, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Muscle Shoals Solar Class B Member, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Muscle Shoals Solar Class B Parent, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Muscle Shoals Solar Seller, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Muscle Shoals Solar TE Partners, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Muscle Shoals Solar, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Napoleon Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Newlands Solar, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % NJ Oak Solar Finco, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % NJ Oak Solar Holdco, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Old 300 Solar Center, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % OONA-SP Haystack Holdings, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Orchard Solar Center, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Orsted Energy Storage & Solar N.A. LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Orsted Helena Member, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Orsted Onshore Asset Management Services, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Orsted Onshore Dermott Holdings, Inc., Delaware, the US 100 % Orsted Onshore DevCo, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Orsted Onshore Development North America, LLC, Delaware, the US S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 165 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 8. Other notes Notes Contents Type1 Ownership interest Segment/company/registered office Type1 Ownership interest Segment/company/registered office Orsted Onshore Equipment Company, LLC, Delaware, the US Orsted Onshore Equipment Holdings, Inc., Delaware, the US Orsted Onshore Equity Holdings, Inc., Delaware, the US Orsted Onshore North America, LLC, Delaware, the US Orsted Onshore North America Power, LLC, Delaware, the US Orsted Onshore Real Estate Holdings, LLC, Delaware, the US Orsted Onshore WS Holdings, Inc, Delaware, the US Orsted Onshore Services, LLC, Delaware, the US Orsted Renewables N.A. LLC, Delaware, the US Palacios Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US Piccadilly Solar Energy Center, LLC, Colorado, the US Placid Solar, LLC, Delaware, the US Placid Solar II, LLC, Delaware, the US Plum Creek Wind, LLC5, Delaware, the US Plum Creek and Willow Creek Class B Member, LLC, Delaware, the US Plum Creek and Willow Creek Project Holdings, LLC, Delaware, the US S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 % Tahoka Wind Project Holdings, LLC5, Delaware, the US 100 % Tahoka Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Thalia Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Tovey Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Waukeenah Solar Center, LLC, Florida, the US 100 % Webb East Solar Center, LLC, Virginia, the US 100 % Western Trail Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Westwing Storage Center, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Willow Creek Wind Power, LLC5, Delaware, the US 100 % Willow Springs Class B Holdco, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Willow Springs Class B Member, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Willow Springs Project Holdings, LLC5, Delaware, the US 100 % Willow Springs Windfarm, LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Wilson Battery Storage LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Ørsted Onshore A/S, Fredericia, Denmark 100 % Ørsted Onshore Holding A/S4, Fredericia, Denmark Pyramid Lake Solar Center, LLC, Delaware, the US S 100 % Markets & Bioenergy Sage Draw Wind Class B Member, LLC, Delaware, the US Sage Draw Wind, LLC5, Delaware, the US Sage Draw Wind Project Holdings, LLC, Delaware, the US SP Energy 1, LLC, Delaware, the US SP Energy DM, LLC, Delaware, the US SP Energy ET, LLC, Delaware, the US SP Energy GL, LLC, Delaware, the US SP Energy PV, LLC, Delaware, the US SP Energy TL, LLC, Delaware, the US Sparta Solar, LLC, Delaware, the US Staked Plains Energy, LLC, Delaware, the US Sundown Wind, LLC, Delaware, the US Tahoka Wind Class B Holdco, LLC, Delaware, the US Tahoka Wind Class B Member, LLC, Delaware, the US S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 % Danish Offshore Gas Systems A/S, Fredericia, Denmark 100 % Danish Oil Pipe A/S4, Fredericia, Denmark 100 % DE Thermal Power Nr. 1 A/S in voluntary liquidation, Fredericia, Denmark 100 % Emineral A/S, Fredericia, Denmark 100 % Etzel-Kavernenbetriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany 100 % Etzel-Kavernenbetriebs-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH, Bremen, Germany 100 % Haderslev Kraftvarmeværk A/S in voluntary liquidation, Fredericia, Denmark 100 % Inbicon A/S, Fredericia, Denmark 100 % Maabjerg Energy Concept A/S, Fredericia, Denmark 100 % Orsted AB, Malmö, Sweden 100 % Orsted Customer Solutions Holding LLC, Delaware, the US 100 % Orsted Energy Solutions (UK) Limited, London, the UK 100 % Orsted ESS Mersey Limited, London, the UK 100 % Orsted Holding Ludwigsau I GmbH, Hamburg, Germany S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S JV A A S S S S S S S S 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 50 % 33 % 33 % 100 % 100 % 70 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 166 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated financial statements – 8. Other notes Notes Contents Type1 Ownership interest Segment/company/registered office Type1 Ownership interest Segment/company/registered office Orsted Infrastructure GmbH4, Hamburg, Germany Orsted Kraftwerke Holding GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Orsted Leitung E GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Orsted Markets GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Orsted Netherlands B.V., ’s-Gravenhage, the Netherlands Orsted Power Sales (UK) Limited, London, the UK Orsted Renescience Northwich Limited, London, the UK Orsted Renescience Northwich O&M Limited, London, the UK Orsted S&D (UK) Limited, London, the UK Orsted Sales (UK) Limited, London, the UK Orsted Sales GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Orsted SP (UK) Limited, London, the UK Orsted SP Holding (UK) Limited, London, the UK Orsted Speicher E GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Orsted US Trading LLC, Delaware, the US Pyroneer A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Renescience A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Severn Power Funding Limited, London, the UK Stigsnæs Vandindvinding I/S, Skælskør, Denmark S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100 % Other 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % EM El Holding A/S, Fredericia, Denmark EnergiGruppen Jylland El A/S, Fredericia, Denmark EnergiGruppen Jylland El Holding A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Orsted (UK) Limited, London, the UK Orsted Holdings N.A. Inc, Delaware, the US Orsted Services Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Orsted Venture N.A. LLC, Delaware, the US Orsted Polska Sp. z o. o., Warsaw, Poland Pict Offshore Limited, Inverkeithing, the UK Taiwan Orsted Financial Services Co., Ltd., Taipai City, Taiwan Ørsted EGJ A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted El A/S4, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Insurance A/S4 , Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted North America Holding A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Nr. 1 2014 A/S3,4 , Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Nr. 1 2020 A/S4 , Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Real Estate A/S4, Fredericia, Denmark NC 64 % Ørsted Services A/S4, Fredericia, Denmark Vejen Kraftvarmeværk A/S in voluntary liquidation, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Bioenergy & Thermal Power A/S4 , Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Commercial Commodities A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted New Bio Solutions China A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted New Bio Solutions Holding A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Pipelines A/S, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Salg & Service A/S4, Fredericia, Denmark S S S S S S S 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % Ørsted Ventures Europe A/S4, Fredericia, Denmark Ørsted Wind Power TW Holding A/S, Fredericia, Denmark 1 2 S = subsidiary A = associate JO = joint operation JV = joint venture NC = non-consolidated entity The company is owned through a company which is not owned 100 % by Ørsted. The disclosed ownership interest is Ørsted’s ultimate ownership interest in the company. 3 4 5 6 The company applies the provision in section 5 or section 6 of the Danish Financial Statements Act to omit presenting a separate annual report. Subsidiaries owned directly by Ørsted A/S. One or more tax equity partners own an insignificant share of the company. See note 4.5 ‘Tax equity liabilities’. The company is fully consolidated. Unincorporated activity which is owned jointly with partners. S S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S S S S S 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 22 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 167 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Contents Consolidated ESG statements (additional information) 169 Basis of reporting 170 Environment 172 Social and governance Surrounded by centuries of history, our office in Warsaw is brand new. Ørsted colleagues here play a vital role in business services and in developing and maintaining the digital systems that keep our wind farms, trading activities, construction projects, and financial services up and running around the world. Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated ESG statements (additional information) Contents Basis of reporting Consolidated environmental, social, and governance (ESG) statements In the consolidated ESG statements, we present our results, objectives, and account- ing policies for the ESG data included in the management’s review in this report. Our full ESG data set can be seen in the independent publication ‘ESG performance report 2020’. The ESG performance report also includes additional information, such as selected ESG indicators by country and all ESG accounting policies, including a list of references for conversion factors used in calculations. Scope and consolidation Unless otherwise stated, ESG data is reported on the basis of the same principles as the financial statements. Thus, the consolidated ESG statements include consolidated data from the parent company, Ørsted A/S, and subsidiaries controlled by Ørsted A/S. Data from associates and joint ventures are not included. The consolidation of safety data deviates from the above-described principles. Safety data is collected using an operational scope. This means that irrespective of our ownership share, we include 100 % of injuries and hours worked, etc., arising from all operations where Ørsted is responsible for safety, including safety related to external suppliers. Data from acquisitions and divestments are included or excluded from the date of acquisition or divestment. In December 2020, we closed the divestment of the liquefied natural gas (LNG) business. Danish Financial Statements Act, sections 99 a, 99 b, and 107 d Pursuant to section 99 a of the Danish Financial Statements Act (Årsregnskabsloven), Ørsted is under an obligation to account for the company’s CSR activities and report on business strategies and activities with regard to human rights, labour rights, anti- corruption, the environment, and the climate. By publishing our sustainability report (orsted.com/sustainability2020), Ørsted complies with section 99 a of the Danish Financial Statements Act. Ørsted’s work for increased gender diversity at management level is reported in accordance with section 99 b of the Danish Financial State- ments Act in our ESG performance report 2020 (orsted.com/ESGperformance2020). Discontinued ESG indicators in 2020 – Power distribution. Discontinued ESG indicators in 2020 which can still be found in the full ESG performance report 2020 – LTIF (lost-time injury frequency). – People powered. – Jobs created. – Nationality diversity of the Board of Directors and the Executive Committee. Scope 3 target: update of the 2018 base year emissions We have updated our 2018 base year for scope 3 emissions in accordance with our policy for baseline adjustments for scope 3, due to our divestment of the LNG business in 2020. Reporting of diversity in accordance with sec- tion 107 d of the Danish Financial Statements Act can be seen in our sustainability report (orsted.com/sustainability2020). Ørsted ESG performance report 2020 Business changes in 2020 affecting ESG data In August 2020, we closed the divestment of the Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses. Our full ESG data set can be seen in the ESG performance report 2020 (orsted.com/ESGperformance2020). 11.3 GW Our installed renewable capacity increased by 14 % from 2019 to 2020. We have a target of +30 GW installed renewable capacity in 2030. 90 % The green share of our heat and power generation increased from 86 % in 2019 to 90 % in 2020. We have a target of 99 % in 2025. 58 g CO2e/ kWh Our greenhouse gas intensity was reduced by 11 % to 58 g CO2e/kWh in 2020. Our target is to reach 10 g CO2e/kWh in 2025. 100 % We reached our target for sourced certified sustainable wooden biomass as the share of certified sustainable biomass is now 100 %. 169 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated ESG statements (additional information) Contents Environment Strategic target Business driver Indicator Green energy share Unit % Greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity (scopes 1 and 2) g CO2e/kWh Direct GHG emissions (scope 1) Thousand tonnes CO2e Indirect GHG emissions (scope 2), location-based Thousand tonnes CO2e Indirect GHG emissions (scope 2), market-based Thousand tonnes CO2e Indirect GHG emissions (scope 3) – Category 2: Capital goods3 – Category 3: Fuel- and energy-related activities4 – Category 11: Use of sold products5 – Other6 Scope 3 GHG reduction from adjusted base year 20187 Installed renewable capacity – Offshore wind power – Onshore wind power – Onshore solar PV power – Biogas, power – Thermal heat, biomass Decided (FID) renewable capacity (not installed yet) – Offshore wind power – Onshore wind power – Onshore solar PV power Awarded and contracted renewable capacity (no FID yet) – Offshore wind power Sum of installed and FID renewable capacity Sum of installed, FID, and awarded/contracted renewable capacity Installed storage capacity Thousand tonnes CO2e Thousand tonnes CO2e Thousand tonnes CO2e Thousand tonnes CO2e Thousand tonnes CO2e % MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MWac Target 2020 2019 99 (2025) 1 10 (2025) 2 50 % (2032) +30 GW (2030) 15 GW (2025) 5 GW (2025)8 90 58 1,851 111 2 25,333 657 2,437 21,980 259 13 11,297 7,572 1,658 10 3 2,054 4,028 2,286 665 1,077 4,996 4,996 15,325 86 65 1,846 123 4 34,604 740 3,217 30,377 270 - 9,870 6,820 987 10 - 2,053 4,129 3,038 671 420 4,996 4,996 13,999 20,321 18,995 21 21 The green (renewable) share of our heat and power generation amounted to 90 % in 2020, up 4 percent- age points relative to 2019. The increase was primarily due to higher generation from wind farms. Our target is 99 % green energy generation in 2025. Our greenhouse gas intensity was reduced by 11 % for the same reasons as for the increase in the renewable energy share. We are well on track to meeting our target of a greenhouse gas emission intensity of no more than 10 g CO2e/kWh in 2025. We will continue to investigate solutions for the remaining emissions, which could include investing in certified carbon- removal projects. We have updated our 2018 base year scope 3 emissions in accordance with our policy for baseline adjustments for scope 3. We divested the LNG busi- ness in 2020. The LNG bussiness accounted for 20 % of the 2018 base year scope 3 emissions. Therefore, we have reduced the scope 3 base year emissions and target emissions in 2032 by 20 %. Our scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions were reduced by 27 % from 2019 to 2020. The main driver for this reduction was the 28 % decrease in gas sales ( category 11). Our second-largest source of scope 3 emissions (category 3) was reduced by 24 % from 2019 to 2020, primarily due to reduced sale of regular power to end-customers. Our third-largest source of scope 3 emissions (category 2) includes greenhouse gas emissions from the supply chain and the instal- lation of new assets, such as the offshore wind farm Borssele 1 & 2 and the three onshore wind farms Sage Draw, Plum Creek, and Willow Creek. 1 Additional target is 95 % (2023). 2 Additional target is 20 (2023). 3 Primary source of emission: wind farm suppliers. 4 Primary source of emission: regular power sales. 5 Primary source of emission: natural gas sales. 6 7 Remaining categories of the 15 defined scope 3 GHG categories according to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. We have adjusted the 2018 base year emissions after the divestement of the LNG business which accounted for 20 % in 2018. 8 The 5 GW target (2025) is for onshore wind and solar PV combined. The installed renewable capacity increased by 14 % in 2020 due to the commisioning of the offshore wind farm Borssele 1 & 2 (752 MW) and the onshore wind farms Sage Draw (338 MW), Plum Creek (230 MW), and Willow Creek (184 MW). 170 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated ESG statements (additional information) Contents Unit GWh GWh GWh GWh GWh GWh GWh MW m/s m/s % % MW m/s m/s % % MW MW Strategic target Business driver Indicator Generation, heat and power total Power generation – Offshore wind – Onshore wind – Solar PV – Thermal Heat generation, thermal Offshore wind Generation capacity Wind speed Wind speed, normal wind year Load factor Availability Onshore wind Generation capacity Wind speed Wind speed, normal wind year Load factor Availability Thermal heat and power generation Power generation capacity Heat generation capacity Degree days, Denmark Coal share of fuels Certified sustainable wooden biomass sourced Green share of generation, Markets & Bioenergy Avoided carbon emissions – From offshore wind generation – From onshore wind generation – From biomass-converted generation Sales Gas sales Power sales 0 (2023) 100 % (2020) Number % % % Million tonnes CO2e Million tonnes CO2e Million tonnes CO2e Million tonnes CO2e TWh TWh Target 2020 32,095 25,424 15,248 5,731 7 4,438 6,671 2019 28,430 20,118 11,965 3,498 15 4,640 8,312 4,379 3,627 9.7 9.3 45 94 1,658 7.6 7.5 45 96 2,847 3,487 2,432 29 100 71 13.1 8.1 3.5 1.5 90.3 29.2 9.2 9.2 42 93 987 7.3 7.5 45 98 2,865 3,560 2,399 24 96 68 11.3 7.6 2.3 1.4 125.0 27.6 The increase in offshore wind capacity contributed to a 27 % increase in offshore wind-based generation in 2020. The increase was primarily due to full-year generation from Hornsea 1 (commissioned in Q4 2019), generation from Borssele 1 & 2 (commisioned in Q4 2020), and higher wind speeds. Onshore wind-based generation increased by 64 % in 2020 relative to 2019. The increase was primarily due to additional generation from Lockett (commissioned in Q3 2019), Sage Draw (commissioned in Q1 2020), Plum Creek (commissioned in Q2 2020), and Willow Creek (commissioned in Q3 2020). Thermal power generation was 4 % lower in 2020 compared with 2019 due to lower combined heat and power generation, partly offset by increased power generation due to ancillary services. Thermal heat generation decreased by 20 %, primarily due to the warm weather in Q1 2020, leading to a lower demand for heat, which was partly offset by colder weather and higher heat generation in H2 2020. The coal share of fuels in our thermal heat and power generation increased by 5 percentage points due to generation at Esbjerg and Studstrup power stations, associated with additional ancillary services. The green share of energy in Markets & Bioenergy increased by 3 percentage points in 2020, primarily due to the bioconversion of Asnæs Power Station in late 2019. We reached our target to source all wooden biomass as certified sustainable biomass in 2020. Due to the increase in renewable energy generation, the amount of avoided carbon emissions increased by 16 % from 2019 to 2020. In 2020, our renewable energy generation avoided the emission of 13.1 million tonnes carbon dioxide. 171 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated ESG statements (additional information) Contents Social and governance Strategic target Business driver Indicator Unit Target 2020 2019 Employees Total number of employees at 31 December Average number of employees for the year Employee satisfaction Safety TRIR (total recordable injury rate) Fatalities Board of Directors, Ørsted A/S Independent board members Gender diversity Members, female Members, male Gender with lowest representation Executive Committee Gender diversity Members, female Members, male Gender with lowest representation Whistle-blower cases Substantiated whistle-blower cases – Cases transferred to the police Number of FTEs Number of FTEs Scale 0-100 Top 10 % (2020)1 Per million working hours 2.9 (2025) Number % Number Number % Number Number % Number Number 1 Our target from 2020 and onward is an employee satisfaction survey result in the top 10 % compared with an external benchmark group. 6,179 6,429 78 3.6 0 100 2 4 33 2 5 29 4 1 6,526 6,329 77 4.9 1 100 2 4 33 2 5 29 3 0 The number of employees decreased by 5 % from 2019 to 2020, primarily due to the divestments of the Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses, partly offset by growth in existing and new markets. Employee satisfaction continued to be high. With a satisfaction and motivation score of 78 in 2020, our target of being in the top 10 % compared to our external benchmark group was met. Our total recordable injury rate (TRIR) decreased from 4.9 in 2019 to 3.6 in 2020. We registered 77 total recordable injuries (TRIs), of which 58 involved employees working for our suppliers. We continue to have a strong focus on safety. Our target is a TRIR of 2.9 or below in 2025. Our employees and other associates may report serious offences, such as cases of bribery, fraud, and other inappropriate or illegal conduct, to our whistle-blower scheme or through our manage- ment system. In 2020, four substantiated cases of inappropriate or unlawful behaviour were reported through our whistle-blower scheme. A total of three cases concerned violation of our good business conduct policy, and one case concerned violation of administrative procedures. The four cases had consequences for the individuals involved. None of the reported cases were critical to our business or impacted our financial results. 172 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated ESG statements (additional information) Contents Accounting policies – environment Green share of heat and power generation The green (renewable energy) share of our heat and power generation and the distribution of the generation from the individual energy sources and fuels are calculated on the basis of the energy sources used and the energy generated at the different energy plants. Wind and solar PV-based generation is computed as the input from the individual plant (wind and solar PV), as there is only one source of power for each plant. For combined heat and power (CHP) plants, the share of the specific fuel (e.g. biomass) is calculated relative to the total fuel consumption for a given plant or unit within a given time period. The specific fuel share is then multiplied with the total heat and power generation for the specific unit in the specific period. The result is the fuel-based generation for the individual unit – for example the biomass-based generation of heat and power from the CHP unit within a given time period. The percentage shares of the individual energy sources are calculated by dividing generation from individual energy source with the total generation. The following energy sources and fuels are con- sidered renewable energy: wind, solar PV, biomass, biogas, and power sourced with green certificates. The following energy sources are considered fossil energy sources: coal, natural gas, and oil. Greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity Greenhouse gas intensity is defined as the scope 1 and 2 (market-based) greenhouse gas emissions divided by the total heat and power generation. Scopes 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions Scope 1 and 2 emissions are calculated based on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Scope 1 covers all direct emissions of greenhouse gases from Ørsted. The direct carbon emissions from the combined heat and power plants are determined on the basis of the fuel quantities used in accordance with the EU ETS scheme. Carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions outside the EU ETS scheme are for the most part calculated as energy consumptions multiplied by emission factors. Scope 2 emissions are primarily calculated as the power volumes purchased multiplied by country-specific emission factors. Location-based emissions are calculated based on average emission factors for each country, whereas market-based emissions take account for green power purchased and assume the regular power is delivered as residu- al power where the green part has been taken out. Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions are reported based on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol which divides the scope 3 inventory into 15 subcategories. GHG emissions from capital goods include upstream GHG emissions from installed wind farms. We calculate the emissions based on GHG life-cycle data from one of our wind turbine suppliers. Carbon emissions are included from cradle to operation and maintenance for single wind turbines. Wind farms are included from the month where the wind farm has achieved commercial operation date (COD). GHG emissions from fuel- and energy-related activi- ties are calculated based on actual fuel consumption and power sales as reported in our ESG consolida- tion system. The fuel consumption is multiplied by emission factors to calculate the upstream GHG emissions from extraction, mining, forestry, transpor- tation, etc., for the fuels. We include all power sales to end-customers and use separate emission factors for green sales (with certificates) and regular sales (without certificates). – business travel, calculated based on mileage allow- ances for employee travel in own car. GHG emissions from plane travel is provided by our travel agent – employee commuting, calculated based on estimates for distance travelled and travel type (e.g. car and train) – downstream transportation and distribution, calcu- lated based on actual volumes of residual products generated from our CHP plants multiplied by relevant GHG emission factors for transportation. Installed, decided (FID), and awarded or contracted renewable energy capacity Installed renewable capacity is calculated as the cumulative renewable gross capacity installed by Ørsted before divestments. For installed renew- able thermal capacity, we use the heat capacity, as heat is the primary outcome of thermal energy generation, and as bioconversions of the combined heat and power plants are driven by heat contracts. Decided (FID) capacity is the renewable capacity for which a final investment decision (FID) has been made. The awarded renewable capacity is based on the capacities which have been awarded to Ørsted in auctions and tenders. The contracted capacity is the capacity for which Ørsted has signed a contract or power purchase agreement (PPA) concerning a new renewable energy plant. Typically, offshore wind farms are awarded, whereas onshore wind farms are contracted. We include the full capacity if more than 50 % of PPAs or offtake are secured. GHG emissions from use of sold products are calcu- lated based on actual sales of gas (to both end-users and wholesale) as reported in our ESG consolidation system. The total gas sale is divided into natural gas, LNG, and biogas which have specific upstream and downstream emission factors. Heat and power generation Power generation from wind is calculated as sold generation. The Gunfleet Sands and Walney 1 and 2 offshore wind farms have been consolidated accord- ing to ownership interest. The other wind farms are financially consolidated. ‘Other’ includes GHG emissions from: – purchased goods and services, calculated based on spend reports from our SAP system. All spends are divided into categories where relevant emission factors are used to calculate the GHG emissions from each spend category – upstream transportation and distribution which are included in the emission factors we use for purchases and sale and are therefore not reported separately – waste generated in operations, calculated based on actual waste volumes multiplied with the relevant emission factors Thermal power generation is determined as net gen- eration sold, based on settlements from the official Danish production database. Data for generation from foreign facilities are provided by the operators. Thermal heat (including steam) generation is measured as net output sold to heat customers. Heat and power generation capacity Power generation capacity from offshore wind farms is included from the time when the individual wind turbine has passed a 240-hour test. For onshore wind and solar PV farms, the whole farm is included after COD. The Gunfleet Sands and Walney 1 and 2 off- shore wind farms have been consolidated according to ownership interest. Other wind farms, solar farms, and CHP plants are financially consolidated. The thermal heat and power generation capacity is a measure of the maximum capability to generate heat and power. The capacity can change over time with plant modifications. For each CHP plant, the capacity is given for generation with the primary fuel mix. Overload is not included. Availability Availability is calculated as the ratio of actual production to the possible production, which is the sum of lost production and actual production in a given period. The production-based availability (PBA) is impacted by grid and wind turbine outages, which are technical production losses. PBA is not impacted by market requested shutdowns and wind farm curtailments, as this is deemed not to be reflective of site performance, but due to external factors. Total availability is determined by weighting the individual wind farm’s availability against the capacity of the wind farm. Load factor The load factor is calculated as the ratio between actual generation over a period relative to potential generation, which is possible by continuously exploit- ing the maximum capacity over the same period. The load factor is commercially adjusted. Commercially adjusted means that, for Danish and German offshore wind farms, the load factor is adjusted if the offshore wind farm has been financially compensated by the transmission system operators in situations where the offshore wind farm is available for generation, but the output cannot be supplied to the grid due to maintenance or grid interruptions. Wind farms in other countries are not compensated for non-access to the grid. New wind turbines are included in the calcula- tion of availability and load factor once they have passed a 240-hour test for offshore wind turbines and commercial operation date (COD) for onshore wind turbines. Wind speed Wind speeds for the areas where Ørsted’s offshore and onshore wind farms are located are provided to Ørsted by an external supplier. Wind speeds are weighted on the basis of the capacity of the individual wind farms and consolidated to an Ørsted total for offshore and onshore, respectively. ‘Normal wind speed’ is a 20-year historical wind speed average. 173 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Consolidated ESG statements (additional information) Contents Only cases which are closed during the financial year, and which have been reported to the Audit & Risk Committee as fully or partially substantiated are reported in the ESG statements. Cases transferred to the police Cases transferred to the police are defined as the number of cases reported in accordance with the above which have been transferred to the police. Degree days Degree days are a measure of how cold it has been and thus indicate the amount of energy needed to heat a building. The number of degree days helps to compare the heat demand for a given year with a normal year. The number of degree days expresses the difference between an average indoor tempera- ture of 17 °C and the outside mean temperature for a given period. The need for heat increases with the number of degree days. Coal share of fuels used for thermal heat and power generation The coal share is calculated as the coal consumption in gigajoule (GJ) relative to the total fuel volume in gigajoule. Certified sustainable wooden biomass sourced Certified biomass is defined as wooden biomass, i.e. wood pellets and wood chips. Biomass is measured as sourced wooden biomass delivered to individual combined heat and power plants within the report- ing period. Certified sustainable wooden biomass sourced must be certified within at least one of the claim catego- ries accepted by the Danish industry agreement on certified biomass. Accepted claim categories are: FSC 100 %, FSC Mix, PEFC 100 %, and SBP compliant. Certified biomass is calculated as the amount of sourced wooden biomass compared to the total amount of sourced wooden biomass delivered to individual CHP plants within the reporting period. Green share of generation, Markets & Bioenergy This is calculated as the green share of heat and power generation, but is only shown for the business unit Markets & Bioenergy. Avoided carbon emissions Avoided carbon emissions due to generation from offshore and onshore wind farms are calculated under the assumption that the generation from wind farms replace an equal quantity of power generated using fossil fuels. The carbon emissions avoided due to conversions of combined heat and power plants and subsequent switch from fossil fuels to biomass is calculated on the basis of the energy content of the fuel used at CHP plants. It is assumed that the use of 1 GJ of biomass fuel avoids the use of 1 GJ of fossil fuels. The upstream emissions (from production, manufacture, and transport of biomass) are included. Sales Sales of power and gas are calculated as physical sales to retail customers, wholesale customers, and exchanges. Sales are based on readings from Ørsted’s trading systems. Internal sales to Bioenergy are not included in the statement. Accounting policies – social Employees Our reporting covers contractually employed employees in all Ørsted companies in which Ørsted holds an ownership interest of more than 50 %. Employees in associates are not included. Employee data are recognised based on records from the Group’s ordinary registration systems. The number of employees is determined as the number of employees at the end of each month converted to full-time equivalents (FTEs). Employees who have been made redundant are recognised until the expiry of their notice period, regardless of whether they have been released from all or some of their duties during their notice period. Employee satisfaction Ørsted conducts a comprehensive employee satis- faction survey once a year. With a few exceptions, all Ørsted employees are invited to participate in the survey. The following employees are not invited to participate: employees who joined the company shortly before the employee satisfaction survey, employees who resigned shortly after the employee satisfaction survey, interns, consultants, advisers, and external temporary workers who do not have an employment contract with Ørsted. Safety Occupational injuries are calculated according to operational scope. Data from companies wholly- or partly-owned by Ørsted, and where Ørsted is responsible for safety, is included. Occupational injuries and lost-time injuries are calculated for both our own employees and suppliers. Data from all Ørsted locations is recognised. The total recordable injury rate (TRIR) is calculated as the number of total recordable injuries per one million hours worked. The number of hours worked is based on 1,667 working hours annually per full-time employee and monthly records of the number of employees converted into full-time employees. For suppliers, the actual number of hours worked is recognised on the basis of data provided by the supplier, access control systems at locations, or estimates. Fatalities are the number of employees who lost their lives as a result of a work-related incident. Accounting policies – governance Board of Directors of Ørsted A/S The employee representatives on the Board of Directors are not included in the data for the Board of Directors. Executive Committee The Executive Committee consists of the Executive Board (our CEO and CFO) and five additional mem- bers who undertake the day-to-day management of Ørsted. Substantiated whistle-blower cases Ørsted’s whistle-blower hotline is available for internal and external reporting of suspected cases of inappropriate or illegal behaviour. Whistle-blower cases are received and handled by the Internal Audit function which also receives similar reports through the management system and from compliance officers. In the survey, a number of questions are asked. The answers are given on a scale from 1 to 10 and are subsequently converted to index figures on a scale from 0 to 100. All reports are managed in accordance with the guidelines for the handling of whistle-blower reports approved by the Audit & Risk Committee, which is ultimately responsible for the whistle-blower scheme. 174 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Contents Parent company financial statements 176 Income statement 176 Balance sheet 177 Statement of changes in equity 178 Notes 1 Basis of reporting 2 Employee costs 3 Financial income and expenses 4 Tax on profit (loss) for the year and deferred tax 5 Distribution of net profit 6 Property, plant and equipment 7 Investments in subsidiaries 8 Receivables from subsidiaries 9 Derivatives 10 Securities 11 Loans and borrowings 12 Other provisions 13 Contingent liabilities 14 Related-party transactions 15 Auditor’s fees 16 Ownership information As we expand our operations in Taiwan’s Changhua County, we have committed to establishing a USD 1.94 million trust fund to provide local suppliers with further training and qualifications. The Changhua offshore wind farms are expected to create over 12,000 direct and indirect jobs. Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Parent company financial statements Contents Income statement Balance sheet 1 January - 31 December 31 December 6 7 8 4 Note Income statement, DKKm Revenue 2 Employee costs External expenses 2020 359 (35) (315) 173 (36) (168) Operating profit (loss) before depreciation, amortisation, and impaiment losses (EBITDA) Amortisation, depreciation, and impairment losses on property, plant, and equipment Operating profit (loss) (EBIT) Gain on divestment of enterprises 3 3 4 5 Financial income Financial expenses Profit (loss) before tax Tax on profit (loss) for the year Profit (loss) for the year 9 (31) (117) (108) 9,110 (146) (177) (94) 21,690 18,743 (12,125) (14,533) 18,567 611 19,178 3,939 (376) 3,563 2019 Note Assets, DKKm 2020 2019 Note Equity and liabilities, DKKm Land and buildings Property, plant, and equipment 894 894 1,352 1,352 Share capital Reserves Investments in subsidiaries 28,778 36,850 Retained earnings 38,152 24,350 Receivables from subsidiaries 80,893 91,839 Proposed dividends 4,834 4,414 Deferred tax Financial assets - 126 109,671 128,815 Equity attributable to shareholders in Ørsted A/S 2020 4,204 43 2019 4,204 (81) 47,233 32,887 13,232 13,232 60,465 46,119 119 729 806 - 601 1,272 Non-current assets 110,565 130,167 Receivables from subsidiaries 29,950 20,771 9 Derivatives Other receivables Income tax Receivables 10 Securities Cash Current assets Assets 4,065 228 254 4,260 2,642 - 34,497 27,673 24,424 15,795 1,219 947 25,643 44,415 170,705 174,582 11 Hybrid capital Equity Deferred tax Other provisions Lease liabilities 4 12 11 11 Bond and bank debt 28,579 31,808 Non-current liabilities 30,233 33,681 12 Other provisions Lease liabilities Bond and bank debt 9 Derivatives Trade payables 133 120 2,956 3,214 55 82 115 1,593 5,119 33 Payables to subsidiaries 70,615 85,695 Other payables Income tax 2,914 - 1,084 1,061 Current liabilities 80,007 94,782 Liabilities 110,240 128,463 Equity and liabilities 170,705 174,582 176 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Parent company financial statements Contents Statement of changes in equity 1 January - 31 December Statement of changes in equity, DKKm Equity at 1 January 2020 Profit (loss) for the year Dividends paid Proposed dividends Purchase of treasury shares Value adjustments of hedging instruments Value adjustments transferred to financial income and expenses Tax on changes in equity Coupon payments, hybrid capital Changes in equity in 2020 Equity at 31 December 2020 Equity at 1 January 2019 Profit (loss) for the year Dividends paid Proposed dividends Purchase of treasury shares Value adjustments of hedging instruments Value adjustments transferred to financial income and expenses Tax on changes in equity Coupon payments, hybrid capital Tax on coupon payments Share-based payment Additions, hybrid capital Disposals, hybrid capital Changes in equity in 2019 Equity at 31 December 2019 Share capital 4,204 Hedging reserve (81) Retained earnings Proposed dividends Shareholders in Ørsted A/S Hybrid capital - - - - - - - - - 4,204 4,204 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4,204 - - - - 72 89 (37) - 124 43 (296) - - - - 185 90 (60) - - - - - 24,350 18,690 4 (4,834) (58) - - - - 13,802 38,152 25,968 2,888 3 (4,414) (99) - - - - - 4 - - 4,414 - (4,414) 4,834 - - - - - 420 4,834 4,099 - (4,099) 4,414 - - - - - - - - - 32,887 18,690 (4,410) - (58) 72 89 (37) - 14,346 47,233 33,975 2,888 (4,096) - (99) 185 90 (60) - - 4 - - 215 (81) (1,618) 24,350 315 4,414 (1,088) 32,887 13,232 488 - - - - - - (488) - 13,232 13,239 675 - - - - - - (556) 34 - 4,416 (4,576) (7) 13,232 Share capital com- position and dividends are disclosed in note 6.2 to the consolidated financial statements. Information on trea sury shares is available in the note. Total 46,119 19,178 (4,410) - (58) 72 89 (37) (488) 14,346 60,465 47,214 3,563 (4,096) - (99) 185 90 (60) (556) 34 4 4,416 (4,576) (1,095) 46,119 177 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Parent company financial statements Contents part of joint taxation with the parent company as the management company. Subsidiaries are included in the joint taxation from the date they are consolidated in the con- solidated financial statements and up to the date on which they are no longer consolidated. Current tax for 2020 is recognised by the individual, jointly taxed companies. Statement of cash flows We do not prepare a separate statement of cash flows for the parent company. Reference is made to the consolidated statement of cash flows on page 81. Key accounting estimates In connection with the preparation of the financial statements, a number of accounting estimates have been made that affect the profit (loss) and balance sheet. Estimates are regularly reassessed by management on the basis of historical experience and other relevant factors. Impairment test If there is any indication that the carrying amount is lower than our future earnings in a company, we test for impairment as described in the consolidated financial statements. The future earnings of the company (recoverable amount) are calculated based on assumptions concerning significant estimates. 1. Basis of reporting Accounting policies The parent company financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Danish Financial Statements Act (‘Årsregnskabsloven’) (reporting class D). Revenue Rental income comprises income from commercial leases and is recognised over the term of the lease. Income from services is recognised when delivery has taken place. The Danish Financial Statements Act allows us to use certain IFRS standards to interpret the act. Previously, we have therefore implemented IFRS 15 ‘Revenue’ and IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. The accounting policies remain unchanged from the previous year. Unless otherwise stated, the financial statements are presented in Danish kroner (DKK) rounded to the nearest million. The parent company accounting policies are consistent with the accounting policies described for the consolidated financial statements, with the following exceptions. Foreign currency translation We recognise exchange rate adjustments of receivables from and payables to sub- sidiaries as financial income and expenses in the income statement when the balances are accounted for as part of the total net investment in foreign enterprises. Likewise, we recognise foreign exchange gains and losses on loans and derivatives in the income statement as financial income and expenses when they have been entered into to hedge the net investment in the foreign enterprises. Dividends from investments Dividends from subsidiaries and associates are recognised in the income statement for the financial year in which the dividends are approved at the annual general meeting. If the dividends exceed the total income after takeover, the dividends are recognised as a reduction of the cost of the investment under assets. Investments We measure our investments in subsidiaries and associates at cost. If there is any indication that the value of a company is lower than our future earnings in the company, impairment testing of the company is carried out as described in the consolidated financial statements. The carrying amount is written down to the recoverable amount whenever the carrying amount exceeds the future earn- ings in the company (recoverable amount). If we have a legal or constructive obligation to cover a deficit in subsidiaries and associates, we recognise a provision for this. Tax Ørsted A/S is taxed jointly with its Danish subsidiaries. The jointly taxed companies are Formosa 1, off the coast of Miaoli County, Taiwan. 178 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Parent company financial statements Contents 2. Employee costs 3. Financial income and expenses Employee costs, DKKm Wages and salaries Share-based payment Pensions and social costs Remuneration Total employee costs Salaries and remuneration of the Executive Board, DKK ’000 Fixed salary Cash-based incentive scheme Share-based payment Pension, incl. social security and benefits Total 2020 29 - 1 5 35 2020 17,230 4,831 (519) 469 2019 Financial income and expenses, DKKm 27 Interest income from cash, etc. 4 - 5 36 Interest income from subsidiaries Interest income from securities at market value Capital gains on securities at market value Foreign exchange gains Value adjustments of derivatives Dividends received 2019 Other financial income 16,810 Total financial income 4,561 4,046 564 Interest expenses relating to loans and borrowings Interest expenses, leases Interest expenses to subsidiaries 22,011 25,981 Impairment of investments in subsidiaries Capital losses on securities at market value Notes 2.7 ‘Employee costs’ and 2.8 ‘Share- based payment’ to the consoli dated financial statements describe the remuneration of the Executive Board and the Board of Directors as well as the share-based payment, termination, and bonus scheme for the Executive Board and details on the remuneration of the Board of Directors. The parent company had an average of six employees in 2020 (2019: six employees). Remuneration of the Board of Directors totals DKK 4 million (2019: DKK 4 million). Foreign exchange losses Value adjustments of derivatives Other financial expenses Total financial expenses Net financial income and expenses 2020 22 2,282 132 - 2,009 5,890 11,332 23 21,690 (1,641) (27) (28) - (11) (5,587) (4,795) (36) 2019 103 2,546 221 166 2,974 8,664 4,068 1 18,743 (1,625) (38) (8) (2,101) (17) (1,060) (9,676) (8) (12,125) (14,533) 9,565 4,210 179 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Parent company financial statements Contents 4. Tax on profit (loss) for the year and deferred tax 5. Distribution of net profit Income tax, DKKm Tax on profit (loss) for the year Tax on changes in equity Total tax for the year Tax on profit (loss) for the year can be broken down as follows: Current tax Adjustments to deferred tax Adjustments to current tax in respect of prior years Adjustments to deferred tax in respect of prior years Tax on profit (loss) for the year Development in deferred tax, DKKm Deferred tax at 1 January Adjustments for the year recognised in profit (loss) for the year Adjustments to deferred tax in respect of prior years Deferred tax at 31 December Specification of deferred tax, DKKm Non-current liabilities Deferred tax, asset Deferred tax, liability 2020 611 (44) 567 747 (239) 109 (6) 611 2020 (126) 239 6 119 2020 119 - 119 2019 (376) Distribution of net profit, DKKm Profit (loss) for the year is attributable to: (30) Shareholders in Ørsted A/S, proposed dividends for the financial year (406) Shareholders in Ørsted A/S, retained earnings Interest payments and costs, hybrid capital owners of Ørsted A/S (704) Profit (loss) for the year 2020 2019 4,834 13,856 488 19,178 4,414 (1,526) 675 3,563 226 105 (3) (376) 2019 97 (226) 3 (126) 2019 126 126 - 180 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Parent company financial statements Contents 6. Property, plant, and equipment 7. Investments in subsidiaries We have entered into leases for office premises, primarily in Gentofte, Denmark (expiring in 2028). We have entered into operating leases with subsidiaries for sublease of office premises. The disposal in 2020 concerns the lease in Virum, Copenhagen. The lease was taken over by SEAS-NVE (now Andel) on 1 September 2020 as part of the sale of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses. In 2020, an amount of DKK 101 million was recognised (2019: DKK 106 million) in profit (loss) for the year in respect of rental income. On 31 August 2020, we divested our Danish power distribution, residential customer and city light businesses to SEAS-NVE (now Andel). The divestment resulted in a gain of DKK 9,065 million in the parent company income statement. income from the individual subsidiaries with their carrying amounts. The impairment test in 2020 did not give rise to any impairment of investments in subsidiaries. We have tested investments in subsidiaries for impairment by comparing the expected future Property. plant, and equipment: Land and buildings, DKKm Cost at 1 January Lease assets at 1 January Disposals Cost at 31 December Depreciation and amortisation at 1 January Depreciation and amortisation Disposals Depreciation and amortisation at 31 December Carrying amount at 31 December Value of leased assets 2020 1,498 - (385) 1,113 (146) (117) 44 (219) 894 894 2019 Investments in subsidiaries, DKKm - Cost at 1 January 1,498 Additions - Disposals 1,498 Cost at 31 December - Value adjustments at 1 January (146) Impairment losses - Value adjustments at 31 December (146) Carrying amount at 31 December 1,352 1,352 Note 8.5 of the consolidated financial statements contains a complete overview of subsidiaries, etc. 2020 40,351 2 (8,074) 32,279 (3,501) - (3,501) 28,778 2019 41,825 27 (1,501) 40,351 (1,400) (2,101) (3,501) 36,850 181 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Parent company financial statements Contents 8. Receivables from 9. Derivatives subsidiaries Non-current receivables from subsidiaries, DKKm Cost at 1 January Additions Disposals Cost at 31 December 2020 91,839 39,518 2019 55,131 50,844 (50,464) (14,136) 80,893 91,839 Ørsted A/S has assumed the subsidiaries’ currency risks via forward exchange contracts which have subsequently been hedged in the market. Furthermore, hedging contracts have been concluded to hedge the currency risk associated with investments in subsidiaries in foreign currencies. We have also entered into a number of interest rate swaps to manage our interest rate risk. The company has fair value hedged loans and receivables in GBP and EUR. The value of the fair value hedge offset in the income statement amounted to DKK -1,098 million (2019: DKK 730 million). Derivatives at the end of December 2020 mature as follows: 2021: DKK -115 million, 2022: DKK 362 million, after 2022: DKK 604 million (2019: 2020: DKK -459 million, 2021: DKK -175 million, after 2021: DKK -225 million). All derivatives are classified as based on observable inputs in the fair value hierarchy. Overview of derivative positions DKKm Interest derivatives Currency derivatives Total Assets Equity and liabilities 2020 2019 Contractual principal amount Market value Contractual principal amount Market value 13,920 35,226 49,146 (10) 861 851 4,065 (3,214) 4,431 26,727 31,158 (85) (774) (859) 4,260 (5,119) 182 / 193 Burbo Bank Extension, Liverpool Bay, the UK. See note 7.1 to the consolidated financial statements and the management’s review on pages 70-73 for more details on risk and risk management. Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Parent company financial statements Contents 10. Securities 12. Other provisions Securities are a key element in our financial resources, and therefore investments are primarily made in liquid AAA-rated Danish mortgage bonds and, to a lesser extent, in other bonds. Most of the securities qualify for repo transactions in the Danish central bank, ’Danmarks Nationalbank’. All securities are classified as based on observable inputs in the fair value hierarchy. We have made provisions for non-current liabil- ities totalling DKK 862 million (2019: DKK 683 million), of which DKK 133 million fall due within 1 year, DKK 577 million fall due in 1-5 years, and DKK 152 million fall due in more than 5 years. The liabilities mainly concern the divestment of our Oil & Gas business in 2017 and the sale of our Danish power distribution, residential customer, and city light businesses to SEAS- NVE (now Andel) in 2020. Securities, DKKm Securities, available for use Total securities 2020 24,424 24,424 2019 15,795 15,795 11. Loans and borrowings On 31 December 2020, we had issued hybrid capital with a total notional amount of DKK 13,398 million (2019: DKK 14,019 million). The hybrid bonds have a 1,000-year term and expire as follows: DKK 5,210 million in 3013, DKK 3,722 million in 3017, and DKK 4,466 million in 3019, respectively. The long-term portion of bank loans and issued bonds amounted to DKK 28,579 million at 31 December 2020 (2019: DKK 31,808 million), of which DKK 24,029 million (2019: DKK 24,938 million) fall due in more than five years. The long-term portion of lease debt amounted to DKK 806 million at 31 December 2020 (2019: DKK 1,272 million) , of which DKK 440 million (2019: DKK 749 million) fall due in more than five years. 13. Contingent liabilities Guarantees Ørsted A/S has provided guarantees in connec- tion with participation by subsidiaries and subsidiaries’ joint operations and joint ventures in the construction and operation of offshore wind farms and natural gas installations as well as guarantees in respect of leases, energy trading activities, purchase, sale and supply agreements, decommissioning obligations, farm-downs and other M&A transactions as wall as secondary liability on decommission- ing of offshore installations related to the divestment of the Oil & Gas business, etc. Ørsted A/S acts as guarantor or surety provider with primary liability for bank liabilities in cer- tain subsidiaries, including guarantees in favour of banks and investors covering credit facilities established and bonds issued in Taiwan. Furthermore, in support of the ratings of Ørsted Salg & Service A/S by Moody’s and Ørsted Wind Power TW Holding A/S by Taiwan Ratings, Ørsted A/S has provided general guarantees covering all obligations and liabilities undertaken in the ordinary course of business by these two entities. Indemnities Ørsted A/S is taxed jointly with the Danish com- panies in the Ørsted Group. As management company, Ørsted A/S has unlimited as well as joint and several liability together with the other jointly taxed companies for Danish income taxes and withholding taxes on dividends, interest, and royalties related to the jointly taxed companies. Litigation Ørsted is involved in ongoing transfer pricing disputes. For further information, we refer to sec- tion 5.1 ‘Approach to taxes’ to the consolidated financial statements. Ørsted A/S is not a party to any litigation proceedings or legal disputes that could have an effect on the company’s financial position, either individually or collectively. 183 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Parent company financial statements Contents 14. Related-party transactions 16. Ownership information Related parties are the Board of Directors, the Executive Board, Ørsted A/S’s subsidiaries, and the Danish state. 2.7 ‘Employee costs’ and 2.8 ‘Share-based payment’ in the consolidated financial statements. Remuneration of the Board of Directors and the Executive Board is disclosed in notes Our related-party transactions are made on arm’s length terms. Ownership information 31 December 2020 Registered office The Danish state represented by the Danish Ministry of Finance Andel A.M.B.A. The Capital Group Companies, Inc. Copenhagen K, Denmark Svinninge, Denmark Los Angeles, the US 1 Interval shown, as precise voting share is not publicly available. Ownership interests 50.12 % 5.01 % - Voting share 50.74 % 5.07 % 5-10 %1 The table shows the shareholders with ownership interests and voting shares of at least 5 %. The differ- ence between ownership interests and voting shares arises when power of attorney is issued. 15. Auditor’s fees Auditor’s fees, DKKm Statutory audit Total fees to PwC 2020 2019 3 3 2 2 184 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Contents Management’s statement, auditor’s reports, and glossary 186 Statement by the Executive Board and the Board of Directors 187 Independent auditor’s reports 190 Limited assurance report on the consolidated ESG statements 191 Glossary Our commitment to sustainability goes beyond renewable energy. In the area close to our offshore wind farms Gode Wind 1 & 2 and Borkum Riffgrund 1 & 2, the local seal rescue centre, Seehundstation Norden, has been looking after orphaned seals since 1971. When deciding on local institutions in Northern Germany to support financially, Seehundstation Norden was a natural choice for us. Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Management’s statement, auditor’s reports and glossary Contents Statement by the Executive Board and the Board of Directors The Board of Directors and the Executive Board have today considered and adopted the annual report of Ørsted A/S for the finan- cial year 1 January - 31 December 2020. facing the Group and the parent company. The management’s review has been prepared in accordance with the Danish Financial Statements Act. Skærbæk, 3 February 2021 Executive Board: The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU and futher requirements in the Danish Financial Statements Act. The financial statements of the parent company, Ørsted A/S, have been prepared in accordance with the Danish Financial Statements Act. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements and the parent company finan- cial statements provide a true and fair view of the Group’s and the parent company’s assets, liabilities, and financial position at 31 December 2020, and of the results of the Group’s and the parent company’s operations and the Group’s cash flows for the financial year 1 January - 31 December 2020. In our opinion, the management’s review pro- vides a true and fair account of the develop- ment in the Group’s and the parent company’s operations and financial circumstances, of the results for the year, and of the overall financial position of the Group and the parent company as well as a description of the most significant risks and elements of uncertainty In our opinion, the annual report for the financial year 1 January - 31 December 2020 with the name ORST-2020-12-31.zip is prepared, in all material respects, in compliance with the ESEF Regulation. In our opinion, the consolidated ESG state- ments (‘Additional information’) represent a reasonable, fair, and balanced representa- tion of the Group’s social responsibility and sustainability performance and are prepared in accordance with the stated accounting policies. We recommend that the annual report be adopted at the annual general meeting. Mads Nipper Group President and CEO Marianne Wiinholt CFO Board of Directors: Thomas Thune Andersen Chairman Lene Skole Deputy Chairman Lynda Armstrong Jørgen Kildahl Peter Korsholm Dieter Wemmer Benny Gøbel* Ole Henriksen* Daniel Tas Sandermann* * Employee representative 186 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Management’s statement, auditor’s reports and glossary Contents Independent auditor’s reports To the shareholders of Ørsted A/S Report on the audit of the Financial Statements Our opinion In our opinion, the Consolidated Financial Statements give a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position at 31 December 2020 and of the results of the Group’s operations and cash flows for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2020 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU (‘IFRS’) and further require- ments in the Danish Financial Statements Act. Moreover, in our opinion, the Parent Company Financial Statements give a true and fair view of the Parent Company’s financial posi- tion at 31 December 2020 and of the results of the Parent Company’s operations for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2020 in accordance with the Danish Financial Statements Act. Our opinion is consistent with our Auditor’s Long-form Report to the Audit & Risk Committee and the Board of Directors. What we have audited The Consolidated Financial Statements of Ørsted A/S for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2020, pp 76-167 and 185-186, comprise the consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of comprehen- sive income, the consolidated balance sheet, the consolidated statement of changes in equity, the consolidated cash flow statement and the notes to the consolidated financial statements, including summary of significant accounting policies. Independence We are independent of the Group in accord- ance with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code) and the additional requirements applicable in Denmark. We have also fulfilled our other ethical respon- sibilities in accordance with the IESBA Code. The Parent Company Financial Statements of Ørsted A/S for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2020, pp 175-186, the income statement, the balance sheet, the state- ment of changes in equity and the notes to the parent financial statements, including summary of significant accounting policies. Collectively referred to as the ‘Financial Statements’. Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and the additional requirements applicable in Denmark. Our responsibilities under those standards and requirements are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. To the best of our knowledge and belief, prohib- ited non-audit services referred to in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 were not provided. Appointment We were first appointed auditors of Ørsted A/S on 19 April 2010 for the financial year 2010 and have been reappointed annually by shareholder resolution for a total period of engagement of 11 years including the financial year 2020. We were reappointed following a tendering procedure at the General Meeting on 2 March 2020. Key audit matters Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most signifi- cance in our audit of the Financial Statements for 2020. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the Financial Statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. 187 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Management’s statement, auditor’s reports and glossary Contents Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter During 2020, Ørsted did not perform any new farm-downs, but completed the construction agreements with partners from previous years’ farm-downs and divested the offshore transmission asset related to the Walney Extension wind farm. As part of our audit we read the sales agreements and the construction agreements and challenged the accounting treatment applied by Manage- ment, including the consolidation method. We furthermore obtained an understanding of the compensation mechanisms and warranties agreed in farm-downs from previous years. We challenged the estimates prepared by Management for recognition and measurement of these compen- sation mechanisms and warranties, hereunder by assessing and testing the data, assumptions and models applied, and by evaluating the outcome of previous estimates prepared by Management. Partnership agreements Divestment of ownership interests in an offshore wind farm (farm-downs) to a partner in a joint operation, including calculating the divestment gains and subsequent recognition of construction agreements and assessment of consolidation method for the retained interests, are considered non-routine transactions. As part of farm-downs, compensation mechanisms are often agreed with the partners, e.g. regarding sales price, cost of subsequent use of the offshore transmission asset constructed for the wind farm, potential wake effect compensations and warranties. We focused on this area because farm-downs and the related matters are considered non-routine transactions and because the recognition and measurement of the divestment gain, assessment of consolidation method, subsequent construction agreements with the partners, compensation mechanisms and warranties are based on signifi- cant judgements and estimates. On this basis, partnership agreements were a matter of most significance in our audit. Refer to notes 1.2, 2.6, and 3.2 in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Income Taxes Ørsted is subject to income taxes in all the coun- tries where they operate. Significant judgements and estimates are required in determining the income taxes, and the measurement of income tax assets and liabilities including uncertain tax positions. Management makes significant judgements and estimates when calculating and assessing the income taxes due to the complex nature of the tax rules related to the business activities conducted in different tax jurisdictions. Furthermore, Manage- ment makes estimates, when measuring the tax assets, including when and to which extent these can be utilised in the future, and when measuring tax liabilities including assessing deferred taxes in tax equity partnerships. Additionally, Ørsted is party in tax and transfer pricing disputes, where Management assesses the possible outcomes and consequently recognise provisions to cover for these uncertain tax positions. In 2020, Ørsted received an administrative decision from the Danish Tax Agency entailing an additional tax payable and related interests, which Manage- ment disputes and has appealed to the relevant authorities. On this basis, income taxes were a matter of most significance in our audit. Refer to notes 1.2, 5.2, and 5.3 in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our procedures in relation to income taxes, income tax assets and liabilities included evaluating the assumptions applied by Management in determin- ing the recognition and measurement of income taxes and deferred taxes, including those related to tax equity partnerships, while taking into account relevant correspondence with tax authorities and external advisors. In our audit of income taxes, we involved our tax specialists. Our procedures covered assessing Management’s judgements and estimates of tax balances and carrying amounts as well as the related applied tax rates when calculating these, including the deferred tax liabilities in tax equity partnerships. Our procedures also covered evaluating and testing Ørsted’s processes for recording, assessing and continually reassessing provisions for uncertain tax positions. In our audit of uncertain tax positions, we obtained and reviewed the correspondence with relevant tax authorities in order to consider the completeness of the tax disputes and the related provisions. When assessing the measurement of the provisions, we challenged the assumptions used, including the possibility of obtaining corresponding tax adjustments, compensations from partners and the likelihood of different outcomes. In addition, we as- sessed relevant opinions obtained by Management from third parties related to the tax disputes, and we evaluated the disclosures provided by Manage- ment in the consolidated financial statements. 188 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Management’s statement, auditor’s reports and glossary Contents Statement on Management’s Review Management is responsible for the Manage- ment’s Review, pp 4-75. Our opinion on the Financial Statements does not cover Management’s Review, and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. In connection with our audit of the Financial Statements, our responsibility is to read Man- agement’s Review and, in doing so, consider whether Management’s Review is materially inconsistent with the Financial Statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or other- wise appears to be materially misstated. Moreover, we considered whether Manage- ment’s Review includes the disclosures required by the Danish Financial Statements Act. Based on the work we have performed, in our view, Management’s Review is in accordance with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Parent Company Financial State- ments and has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Danish Financial Statements Act. We did not identify any mate- rial misstatement in Management’s Review. Management’s responsibilities for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the prepara- tion of consolidated financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU and further require- ments in the Danish Financial Statements Act and for the preparation of parent company financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with the Danish Financial Statements Act, and for such internal control as Management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial state- ments that are free from material misstate- ment, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the Financial Statements, Management is responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of account- ing unless Management either intends to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Financial Statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and the additional requirements applicable in Denmark will always detect a material mis- statement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influ- ence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these Financial Statements. As part of an audit in accordance with ISAs and the additional requirements applicable in Denmark, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism through- out the audit. We also: – Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the Financial Statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. – Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s and the Parent Company’s internal control. – Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by Management. – Conclude on the appropriateness of Management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s and the Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the Financial Statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group or the Parent Company to cease to continue as a going concern. – Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the Financial Statements, including the disclosures, and whether the Financial Statements represent the under- lying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation. – Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the en- tities or business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the group audit. We remain solely respon- sible for our audit opinion. We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit. We also provide those charged with govern- ance with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards. 189 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Management’s statement, auditor’s reports and glossary Contents From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the Financial Statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be com- municated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication. Report on compliance with the ESEF Regulation As part of our audit of the Financial State- ments we performed procedures to express an opinion on whether the annual report of Ørsted A/S for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2020 with the file name ORST-2020-12-31.zip is prepared, in all material respects, in compliance with the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 on the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF Regulation) which includes requirements related to the preparation of the annual report in XHTML format and iXBRL tagging of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Management is responsible for preparing an annual report that complies with the ESEF Regulation. This responsibility includes: – The preparing of the annual report in XHTML format; – The selection and application of appropriate iXBRL tags, including extensions to the ESEF taxonomy and the anchoring thereof to elements in the taxonomy, for all financial information required to be tagged using judgement where necessary; – Ensuring consistency between iXBRL tagged data and the Consolidated Financial State- ments presented in human-readable format; and – For such internal control as Management determines necessary to enable the prepa- ration of an annual report that is compliant with the ESEF Regulation. Our responsibility is to obtain reasonable assur- ance on whether the annual report is prepared, in all material respects, in compliance with the ESEF Regulation based on the evidence we have obtained, and to issue a report that includes our opinion. The nature, timing and extent of procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material departures from the requirements set out in the ESEF Regulation, whether due to fraud or error. The procedures include: – Testing whether the annual report is prepared in XHTML format; – Obtaining an understanding of the company’s iXBRL tagging process and of internal control over the tagging process; – Evaluating the completeness of the iXBRL tagging of the Consolidated Financial Statements; – Evaluating the appropriateness of the com- pany’s use of iXBRL elements selected from the ESEF taxonomy and the creation of exten- sion elements where no suitable element in the ESEF taxonomy has been identified; – Evaluating the use of anchoring of extension elements to elements in the ESEF taxonomy; and – Reconciling the iXBRL tagged data with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements. In our opinion, the annual report of Ørsted A/S for the financial year 1 January to 31 December 2020 with the file name ORST-2020-12-31.zip is prepared, in all material respects, in compli- ance with the ESEF Regulation. Hellerup, 3 February 2021 PricewaterhouseCoopers Statsautoriseret Revisionspartnerselskab CVR No 3377 1231 Lars Baungaard State Authorised Public Accountant mne23331 Rasmus Friis Jørgensen State Authorised Public Accountant mne28705 190 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Management’s statement, auditor’s reports and glossary Contents Limited assurance report on the consolidated ESG statements To the stakeholders of Ørsted A/S Ørsted A/S engaged us to provide limited assurance on the data described below and set out in the consolidated environment, social, and governance statements for the period 1 January - 31 December 2020 (consolidated ESG statements) as included on pages 168-174 in the Annual Report of Ørsted A/S for 2020. Our conclusion Based on the procedures we performed and the evidence we obtained, nothing came to our attention that causes us not to believe that the consolidated ESG statements are free of material misstatements and are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the accounting policies as stated on pages 168-174. This conclusion is to be read in the context of what we say in the remainder of our report. What we are assuring The scope of our work was limited to assurance over data in the consolidated ESG statements for the period 1 January - 31 December 2020 on pages 168-174. Professional standards applied and level of assurance We performed a limited assurance engagement in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (revised) ‘Assurance Engagements other than Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information’, and, in respect of the reported greenhouse gas emissions, in accordance with International Stand- ard on Assurance Engagements 3410 ‘Assurance engagements on greenhouse gas statements’. A limited assurance engagement is substantially less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement in relation to both the risk assess- ment procedures, including an understanding of internal control, and the procedures performed in response to the assessed risks; consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assur- ance that would have been obtained had a rea- sonable assurance engagement been performed. Our independence and quality control We have complied with the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants issued by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants, which includes independence and other ethical requirements founded on funda- mental principles of integrity, objectivity, profes- sional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional behaviour. The firm applies International Standard on Quality Control 1 and accordingly maintains a comprehensive system of quality control, including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards, and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. Our work was carried out by an independent multi -disciplinary team with experience in sustain ability reporting and assurance. Understanding reporting and measurement methodologies Data and information need to be read and understood together with the accounting policies on pages 168-174, which management are solely responsible for selecting and applying. The absence of a significant body of established practice on which to draw to evaluate and measure ESG information allows for different, but acceptable, measurement techniques and can affect comparability between entities and over time. The quantification of greenhouse gas emissions is subject to inherent uncertainty be- cause of incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine the emissions factors and the values needed to combine emissions of different gasses. Work performed We are required to plan and perform our work in order to consider the risk of material misstate- ment of the data. In doing so and based on our professional judgment, we: – conducted interviews with Group functions to assess consolidation processes, use of company -wide systems, and controls performed at Group level; – performed an assessment of materiality and the selection of topics for the consolidated ESG statements for the period 1 January - 31 December 2020; – conducted an analytical review of the data and trend explanations submitted by all business units for consolidation at Group level; and – evaluated the evidence obtained. Management’s responsibilities Management of Ørsted A/S is responsible for: – designing, implementing and maintaining internal control over information relevant to the preparation of data in the consolidated ESG statements on pages 168-174 that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; – establishing objective accounting policies for preparing data; – measuring and reporting data in the con- solidated ESG statements based on the accounting policies; and – the content of the consolidated ESG statements for the period 1 January - 31 December 2020. Our responsibility We are responsible for: – planning and performing the engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the consolidated ESG statements for the period 1 January - 31 December 2020 on pages 168-174 are free from material misstatements and are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the accounting policies; – forming an independent conclusion, based on the procedures performed and the evidence obtained; and – reporting our conclusion to the stakeholders of Ørsted A/S. Hellerup, 3 February 2021 PricewaterhouseCoopers Statsautoriseret Revisionspartnerselskab CVR no. 3377 1231 Lars Baungaard State Authorised Public Accountant mne23331 Rasmus Friis Jørgensen State Authorised Public Accountant mne28705 191 / 193 Ørsted Annual report 2020 Financial statements Management’s statement, auditor’s reports and glossary Contents Glossary Availability: Availability is calculated as the ratio of actual production to the possible production, which is the sum of lost production and actual production in a given period. The production-based availability (PBA) is impacted by grid and wind turbine outages, which are technical production losses. PBA is not impacted by market requested shutdowns and wind farm curtailments, as this is deemed not to be reflective of site performance, but due to external factors. Avoided emissions: The amount other sources of energy would have emitted, if we had not generated energy from renewable sources. Awarded capacity: Offshore capacity that we have been awarded in auctions and tenders, but where we have yet to sign a PPA and take final investment decision. Biomass conversion: When a CHP plant is converted from using fossil fuels to using biomass, such as wood pellets, wood chips, and straw. After the conversion, the CHP plant will typically be able to use biomass along with the original fuel types. Blockage effect: The blockage effect arises from the wind slowing down as it approaches the wind turbines. BSUoS tariffs: Costs related to the day-to-day operation of the transmission system imposed on generators and suppliers. Carbon emission allowances: Carbon emission allowances subject to the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS). CfD: A contract for difference is a subsidy that guar- antees the difference between the market reference price and the exercise price won. CHP plant: A combined heat and power (CHP) plant generates both heat and power in the same process. Contracted capacity: Onshore capacity where we have signed a PPA, but where we have not yet taken final investment decision. Decided (FID) and installed capacity: Installed gener- ation capacity plus capacity for assets where a final investment decision has been made. Degree days: Number of degrees in absolute figures in difference between the average temperature and the official Danish indoor temperature of 17 °C. Direct current (DC): The type of power generated by our solar panels. EPC: Engineering, procurement, and construction. The part of our business which handles the construction and installation of assets. FTE: Employees (full-time equivalent). The number of full-time employees during a fixed time period. Generation capacity: Ørsted’s ownership of the asset. Offshore wind turbines are included when each turbine has passed the 240-hour test. Onshore capacities are included after COD. Green certificates: Certificate awarded to producers of environment-friendly power as a supplement to the market price of power in the given price area. Green dark spread (GDS): Represents the contribution margin per MWh of power generated at a coal-fired CHP plant with a given efficiency. It is determined as the difference between the market price of power and the cost of the coal (including associated freight costs) and carbon emission allowances used to generate the power. Hedging instruments: Financial and physical instru- ments that can be used to guarantee a specific price for the purchase or sale of, for example, commodities and currency. Commissioning/COD: When our assets are in oper- ation, and the legal liability has been transferred from the supplier to us. Installed capacity: Installed capacity where the as- set has been completed and has passed a final test. Investment tax credits (ITCs): Federal tax credit based on qualifying renewable investment costs. Stress: Method of measuring the market trading risk of loss on a portfolio from day to day, calculated on a fair-value basis. Levelised cost of electricity (LCoE): Average cost measured as present value per megawatt hour (MWh) generated power, covering costs for development and construction as well as subsequent operation and maintenance of the asset. Load factor: The ratio between the actual power generation in a given period relative to the potential generation which is possible by continuously exploit- ing the maximum capacity over the same period. Nord Pool: The Norwegian-based Nordic power exchange which facilitates power trading in Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Denmark. Offshore transmission assets: Connect offshore gen- eration to the onshore grid and typically include the offshore power transmission infrastructure, an onshore substation, and the electrical equipment relating to the operation of the substation. O&M: Operations and maintenance. The part of our business that operates and maintains our assets after installation. Partnership income: Income originating from our partners’ purchase of ownership interests in the offshore wind farms. Includes both the gain in connection with the farm-down and the subsequent construction of the wind farm. Power purchase agreement (PPA): An agreement between us and a buyer/seller to purchase/sell the power we generate which includes all commercial terms (price, delivery, volumes, etc). Production tax credit (PTC): Federal tax credit based on eligible power generation in the US. ROCs: Renewable obligation certificates issued by Ofgem in the UK to operators of accredited generating stations for the eligible renewable energy they generate. Operators can trade ROCs with other parties. Tax equity: An arrangement where an investor obtains rights to federal tax credits and other tax attributes in exchange for a cash contribution. TEC: Transmission entry capacity defines a generator’s maximum contractual level of transmission access in MW. Thermal generation: Heat and power generated through the combustion of fossil fuels, biomass, or waste. FID: Final investment decision. TNUoS tariffs: Costs related to the use of the trans- mission networks in the UK based on TEC. TRIR: In addition to lost-time injuries, the total record- able injury rate (TRIR) also includes injuries where the injured person is able to perform restricted work the day after the accident as well as accidents where the injured person has received medical treatment. TTF: Title transfer facility, Dutch gas hub. TWh: Terawatt-hour. The amount of energy generated in one hour with the effect of 1 TW. 1 TWh is equivalent to 1,000 GWh or 1,000,000 MWh. Value at risk (VaR): A financial term used for measur- ing the loss that may occur in connection with a risk position, assuming a certain volatility, and that the position is held for a certain period of time. Wake effect: Wake within wind farms and between neighbouring wind farms. There is a wake after each wind turbine where the wind slows down. As the wind flow continues, the wake spreads, and the wind speed recovers. Wind speed: Shows the wind speed at Ørsted’s wind farms. The wind measurements are weighted on the basis of our generation capacity and can be compared to a normal wind period. 192 / 193 Ørsted A/S Kraftværksvej 53 DK-7000 Fredericia Tel.: +45 99 55 11 11 CVR no. 36213728 orsted.com Group Communication Martin Barlebo Tel.: +45 99 55 95 52 Investor Relations Allan Bødskov Andersen Tel.: +45 99 55 79 96 Design and layout e-Types with Ørsted Global Design Publication 3 February 2021
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above