2024 Annual Report
Delivering Turnkey Production Test and Burn-in
Solutions for Semiconductors Where Quality,
Reliability, Safety or Security are
Absolutely Critical.
Aehr Test Systems
(in thousands, except per share data)
For the years ended May 31,
2024
2023
2022
Net sales
$66,218
$64,961
$50,829
Income from operations
10,078
13,375
7,800
Net income
33,156
14,557
9,450
Earnings per share - diluted
1.12
0.50
0.34
Cash and cash equivalents
49,159
30,054
31,484
Working capital
87,340
72,722
48,993
Shareholders’ equity
111,593
75,600
50,989
Aehr Test Systems provides turnkey solutions used in a wide range of test and reliability screening (burn-in)
applications for high reliability semiconductors used in many applications including electric vehicles and
electric vehicle charging infrastructure, automotive applications, mobile devices, computing, solid state
memory storage, networking and data storage, and telecommunications including 5G infrastructure. The
turnkey solutions include test and burn in systems, consumable contactors between the test systems and the
devices under test in wafer, singulated die, package and module form, and devices handlers and aligners that
manually or automatically move the devices under test into position to make contact with the consumable
contactors. Test systems include both wafer and singulated die and module systems within the FOX-P Family
of test and burn-in systems, and the Automated Burn-in and Test System (ABTS) family of packaged part test
and burn-in systems.
PRODUCTS
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The FOXTM-XP Test and Burn-in System is designed for
single-touchdown testing of up to 18 wafers at a time and for
testing singulated die or small modules. The FOX-NP is a
low-cost entry-level system to provide a configuration and
price point for companies to do initial production
qualification and new product introduction, enabling an easier
transition to the FOX-XP system for high volume production
test. The FOX-XP and FOX-NP systems are optimized for
test and burn-in where the test time is measured in hours or
days and the full wafer can be tested in a single touchdown.
Both systems are capable of testing wafers with thousands of
devices in a single touchdown using Aehr Test’s proprietary
WaferPak full wafer contactors.
FOX-NP and FOX-XP Wafer
Level Test & Burn-in Systems
PRODUCTS
This Annual Report contains certain “forward-looking” statements based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions that involve risks and
uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include statements relating to future market opportunities and conditions, industry growth and customer
demand for Aehr Test's products. Actual results may differ materially from those stated or implied due to risks and uncertainties. See Aehr Test's recent
10-K report that is part of this Annual Report for a more detailed description of the risks facing our business. Aehr Test disclaims any obligation to
update information contained in any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Annual Report.
The FOX-CP is a low-cost single-wafer compact test burn-in
solution that is integrated with an automated single wafer
prober for applications where test times range from only a few
minutes to a few hours or where multiple touchdowns are
required to test the entire wafer.
The FOX-1P Full Wafer Parallel Test System is designed for
massively parallel testing in wafer sort. By utilizing Design for
Testability (DFT) or Built-In Self-Test (BIST), test costs can be
decreased significantly due to the extremely high parallelism of
the system. It can be configured to dock to a single wafer
prober or dual wafer probers such as shown in the photo to the
right.
ABTS Test & Burn-in System
FOX Automated WaferPak Aligner
Integrated with an 18 Wafer FOX-XP
FOX-CP and FOX-1P Wafer
Level Test & Burn-in Systems
Aehr Test’s patented WaferPak Contactor and DiePak®
Carriers connect electrical and optical test resources from
Aehr’s FOX systems to the customer’s wafer or singulated
die/modules to be tested or burned-in. Both products contain
micro-miniature probes to contact all the die/modules in a
single insertion.
Full wafer contact of all the devices on a wafer is made feasible
using Aehr’s proprietary WaferPaks and WaferPak Aligners.
Aehr provides fully Automated Aligners for hands free
operation while docked to multi-wafer FOX-XP ’s or can be
used “offline” to allow WaferPak Alignment to serve multiple
FOX-XPs in production. Aehr also provides a low-cost
Aligner for use in engineering and low volume production
applications.
Automated Burn-in and Test System (ABTS) family of packaged part test
and burn-in systems are used for traditional package part reliability
qualification and also for production burn-in of devices where their
extrinsic or early failure rate is not acceptable to the end application. The
ABTS system uses device package burn-in boards test devise in packaged
form whereas the FOX systems used Aehr proprietary WaferPak full
wafer contactors or DiePak singulated die or module carriers to test and
burn-in devices in wafer or singulated die / module form to remove early
failures and to lower the failure rate to address applications where quality,
reliability, safety or security are absolutely critical.
Dear Shareholders, Customers, Partners, and Employees,
In fiscal 2024 we made significant strides in advancing our wafer level test and burn-in business while
broadening the markets we serve to diversify our customer base. We added several new silicon carbide
customers this past year and achieved another year of record annual revenue. During the year, we also gained
traction penetrating new market opportunities that we believe hold strong potential to become key growth
areas for our differentiated and proprietary reliability test and burn-in products.
These new target markets include: quality reliability and production test and burn-in of artificial intelligence
processors; wafer level burn-in of flash memory devices used in solid-state disk drives; burn-in of
semiconductors used in hard disk drive magnetic read/write heads; wafer level burn-in of gallium nitride power
semiconductors used in data centers and solar power conversion; and stabilization and burn-in of silicon
photonics integrated circuits used for optical I/O communication between chipsets and processors.
This past year, we expanded our customer base with the addition of three new major silicon carbide
customers. These new customers selected our systems primarily for applications other than electric vehicles,
including industrial, solar, and commuter electric trains. This further extended our application space beyond the
opportunity we see in silicon carbide for traction inverters and onboard and offboard chargers for electric
vehicles.
Over the past year we engaged with a number of potential new silicon carbide device and module suppliers
related to their anticipated capacity needs, and we remain engaged with these and many of the major players in
the market including many in China. We continue to make meaningful progress with our previously announced
benchmarks and engagements with these potential customers.
Although there have been delays in silicon carbide orders due to slower demand in the electric vehicle market
during the second half of our fiscal year, we see this as part of the typical technology adoption cycle. This cycle
often starts with heightened enthusiasm and rapid growth projections from early adopters, followed by a period
of adjustment and slower growth, and eventually leads to a renewed acceleration as broader adoption takes
hold. The silicon carbide market remains a sizeable opportunity for Aehr. While the adoption of battery electric
vehicles has been slower than many anticipated a year ago, we ended the fiscal year with optimism, as forecasts
still predict that battery electric vehicle sales will more than triple to 30 million or 30% of total vehicle
production worldwide by 2030.
Wafer level test and burn-in of silicon carbide power semiconductors for electric vehicles was a key driver of
our business last year. We expect silicon carbide to remain a key contributor to revenue in the current fiscal
year and beyond, especially as it is increasingly evident that silicon carbide is the plan of record for electric
vehicles. As more manufacturers adopt silicon carbide, we are well positioned to continue to capture market
share. We anticipate continuing to grow our silicon carbide customer base this fiscal year and next, as the
adoption of silicon carbide accelerates.
One of the key emerging market opportunities we are targeting is the increasing demand for Artificial
Intelligence (AI) processor test and burn-in, both at wafer level and for packaged part components.
We are currently collaborating with an AI accelerator company, which has committed to evaluating our FOX
solution for production wafer level burn-in of their high-power processors. Following a successful
demonstration of wafer level test results and throughput, we anticipate that they will adopt our new high-power
FOX-XP systems for the production of their next-generation AI processors, starting this fiscal year.
This AI accelerator company recognizes the substantial benefits of performing production test and burn-in of
their accelerators while still in wafer form, before integration into the final application. This approach is not
only more cost effective but also significantly more scalable compared to screening later in the manufacturing
process. We see this as a major opportunity to displace the current package and system-level tests for AI
L
E
T
T
E
R
T
O
O
U
R
S
H
A
R
E
H
O
L
D
E
R
S
processes used in large language model development. With the current capabilities of our new high-power
FOX-XP system, which supports up to 3,500 watts per wafer test, we are well equipped to meet this challenge.
AI semiconductors are among the highest power-consuming devices in the semiconductor industry, with recent
devices operating at power levels exceeding 1,000 watts, far beyond typical processors. These power demands
create a new market that necessitates innovative test solutions.
On August 1, we were excited to announce the completion of our acquisition of Incal Technology, a well-
known manufacturer of reliability test and burn-in solutions for a wide range of semiconductor devices and
markets. Incal brings a new product family of ultra-high-power test solutions for AI accelerators, graphics and
network processors, and high-performance computing processors. The integration of Incal’s Sonoma ultra-
high-power package capabilities with Aehr's lineup of wafer level test and reliability solutions positions us to
capitalize on the rapidly expanding AI semiconductor market as a turnkey provider, offering reliability and
testing services that span from engineering to high-volume production.
The AI market is rapidly growing but still in its early stages, presenting a market opportunity for our FOX
wafer level production systems, as well as our new lineup of package part burn-in systems through our
acquisition of Incal. The unique challenges associated with testing very high-power devices related to AI
processors underscore the need for extensive engineering qualification, process development, and new
production reliability screening at the package part level. We estimate that the combined reliability test and
burn-in market for AI processors at both the wafer and package part levels exceeds $100 million annually. With
our expanded product portfolio, we believe we are poised to capture a substantial share of this market within
this fiscal year.
We are actively engaged with multiple NAND memory suppliers and have secured a commitment
from one of the major flash memory manufacturers to evaluate the potential of our FOX-XP solution
this fiscal year for wafer level test and burn-in of their flash memory devices. This evaluation focuses on
providing 100% test and burn-in for devices destined for high-reliability applications, such as enterprise
storage.
This benchmarking process will extend throughout the fiscal year, involving the development of a new high-
density WaferPak Contactor designed for the production wafer level burn-in of 300-millimeter NAND wafers.
We view this as a multi-year opportunity and expect to obtain preliminary results and feedback within this fiscal
year. Our objective is to reach an agreement on a customer-specific development of a test cell, with potential
revenue contribution starting in fiscal 2026, which begins next June. Achieving this milestone last year was a
significant accomplishment, and we believe it represents the beginning of a promising opportunity for our
solutions.
According to the average of multiple market forecasts, memory semiconductors are projected to account for
over 50% of all semiconductor wafers shipped globally in 2024, with approximately half being NAND flash
memory and the other half DRAM. We see the memory market as an opportunity to provide wafer level burn-
in solutions, helping memory suppliers meet their reliability and quality demands, particularly in stack die
applications. In the longer term, we believe DRAM will become a crucial target market for our systems,
especially as the proportion of DRAM used in multi-chip modules such as GPUs, CPUs, and AI processors
continues to increase.
We identified new market opportunities for wafer level burn-in of semiconductors used in hard disk
drives, including a lead customer who is forecasting a production ramp beginning this fiscal year for a
new high-volume data storage device application. We believe this will drive orders for our FOX
production systems and WaferPak Contactors. This major customer, who we first announced back in 2019
before COVID-19, initially purchased our FOX-CP, our single wafer testing reliability solution for logic
memory and photonics devices, to support wafer level test and burn-in for a high-volume application in the
enterprise and data center market. Although they had anticipated ramping into production over several years,
the pandemic disrupted their plans.
Following a multi-year product development and qualification process, along with delays caused by COVID-19,
this customer in the hard disk drive industry has now introduced their product and is forecasting the
production ramp to begin in our current fiscal year. We anticipate this ramp will generate orders for multiple
FOX-CP production systems and WaferPak Contactors, potentially making this customer one of our top
revenue contributors this fiscal year. We view the data storage market, along with various devices related to the
global 5G build-out, as new opportunities for our systems given that these end markets demand devices with
exceptionally high levels of quality and long-term reliability.
We successfully shipped the first order from a major silicon photonics customer for our new high-
power configuration of the FOX-XP system designed for volume production wafer level burn-in and
stabilization of next-generation silicon photonics integrated circuits (ICs). This advanced configuration
significantly broadens our market opportunity by enabling cost-effective, high-volume production testing of
next-generation photonic ICs, which are intended for use in the emerging optical I/O and co-packaged optics
markets.
These next-generation silicon photonics-based ICs can require two to four times more power for full wafer test
burn-in and stabilization. Aehr's new high-power system configuration can test and burn-in up to nine of these
new optical I/O device wafers at a time, with each wafer consuming up to 3,500 watts of power. This capability
is unmatched in the market, as no other solution can test even a single one of these wafers in a single
touchdown, let alone nine at a time as we can.
Companies like Nvidia, AMD, and Intel have all discussed the possibility of incorporating optical chip-to-chip
communication in AI processors and high-performance computing chips to enhance performance and achieve
power savings. Optical I/O has the potential to revolutionize the semiconductor industry by overcoming the
data transmission bandwidth limitations inherent in electrical I/O. Currently, Aehr has six customers utilizing
our systems for production testing of their silicon photonics devices. While the precise timing of these devices
and their volume ramps remains uncertain, we are closely monitoring this market to ensure that our products
and solutions are ready to meet the demands of this potentially transformative market application.
We announced our first order for our FOX wafer level test and burn-in system to be used for gallium
nitride (GaN) devices, and we are actively collaborating with several of the leading companies in the
GaN market. Throughout the past year, we received a substantial number of WaferPak Contactor orders for
GaN reliability testing and qualification of our systems, positioning us prominently in this market, which we
believe holds potential as a growth driver for our wafer level solutions. We have now received initial forecasts
for wafer level production burn-in systems to be delivered during this fiscal year.
While silicon carbide will be the semiconductor material of choice for electric vehicle traction inverters, GaN is
expected to make substantial inroads in the onboard charging market, as well as in other automotive, solar, and
data center power conversion applications. GaN offers faster performance, greater efficiency, and lower power
losses compared to traditional silicon-based power semiconductors. We are highly encouraged by the
momentum in this market and believe it represents a significant and promising opportunity for Aehr’s
solutions.
As we look ahead, we anticipate an exciting fiscal 2025 for Aehr. Silicon carbide is expected to remain a key
contributor to revenue again this year, but we also expect increased bookings and revenue from a much
broader spectrum of customers and markets. Market forecasts, including those from the Semiconductor
Industry Association, project that the semiconductor industry will grow from $600 billion in 2022 to over $1
trillion by around 2030. The rising reliability concerns surrounding semiconductors in an expanding range of
mission-critical applications, coupled with the growing trend towards multi-chip modules or heterogeneous
integration, where multiple devices are assembled into a single package, are fueling the demand for wafer level
burn-in. With our industry-leading product portfolio, we believe Aehr is well-positioned for growth this fiscal
year and beyond.
I remain deeply grateful to our employees, customers, partners, and shareholders for their continued support.
Gayn Erickson, President and CEO
1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024
or
☐
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ________________ to ________________
Commission file number: 000-22893
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California
94-2424084
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
400 KATO TERRACE, FREMONT, CA
94539
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (510) 623-9400
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading
Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange
on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
AEHR
The NASDAQ Capital Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an
emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer
☐
Accelerated filer
☐
Non-accelerated filer
☒
Smaller reporting company
☒
Emerging growth company
☐
2
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its
internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that
prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant
included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based
compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the
closing price of $22.96 on November 30, 2023, as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market, was $630,123,470. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of
common stock held by persons who hold more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock (other than such persons of whom the Registrant
became aware only through the filing of a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission) and shares held by officers and directors of
the Registrant have been excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily conclusive
for other purposes.
The number of shares of registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding at July 15, 2024 was 29,007,409.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated. Such Definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within
120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended May 31, 2024.
3
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS
FORM 10-K
FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1.
Business
4
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
12
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
19
Item 1C.
19
Item 2.
20
Item 3.
21
Item 4.
Cybersecurity
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
21
PART II
Item 5.
22
Item 6.
22
Item 7.
23
Item 7A.
28
Item 8.
29
Item 9.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
[Reserved]
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
54
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
54
Item 9B.
Other Information
54
Item 9C.
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdiction that Prevent Inspections
54
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
55
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
55
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
55
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
55
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
55
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
56
Item 16.
58
Form 10-K Summary
Signatures
59
4
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act). All statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K other than statements of historical fact,
including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, our business strategy and plans, and our
objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,”
“anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “expect,” “could,” “target,” “project,” “should,” “predict,” “potential,” “would,” “seek” and
similar expressions and the negative of those expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-
looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual
results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. These risks include but are
not limited to those factors identified in “Risk Factors” beginning on page [11] of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, those
factors that we may from time to time identify in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as
other factors beyond our control. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for
any reason. Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Form 10-K to “Aehr Test,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and
“our” refer to Aehr Test Systems.
Investors and others should note that we announce material financial information to our investors using our investor
relations website (https://www.aehr.com/investor-relations/), SEC filings, press releases, public conference calls and webcasts.
We use these channels to communicate with our investors and the public about our company, our products and services and
other issues. It is possible that the information we post on our investor relations website could be deemed to be material
information. Therefore, we encourage investors, the media, and others interested in our company to review the information we
post on our investor relations website.
PART I
Item 1. Business
OVERVIEW
Aehr Test Systems, Inc. (“Aehr Test,” “Aehr,” or “we”) was incorporated in the state of California on May 25, 1977 and is
headquartered in Fremont, California. We are a leading provider of test solutions for testing, burning-in, and stabilizing
semiconductor devices in wafer level, singulated die, and package part form, and have installed thousands of systems
worldwide. Mission critical applications are driving increased quality, reliability, safety, and security needs of semiconductors.
The applications include electric vehicles, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, solar and wind power, computing, data and
telecommunications infrastructure, and solid-state memory storage. The trend is driving additional test requirements,
incremental capacity needs, and new opportunities for Aehr Test products and solutions. We have developed and introduced
several innovative products including the FOX-PTM family of test and burn-in systems and FOX WaferPakTM Aligner, FOX
WaferPak Contactor, FOX DiePak® Carrier and FOX DiePak Loader. The FOX-XP and FOX-NP systems are full wafer
contact and singulated die/module test and burn-in systems that can test, burn-in, and stabilize a wide range of devices such as
leading-edge silicon carbide-based and gallium nitride power semiconductors, 2D and 3D sensors used in mobile phones,
tablets, and other computing devices, memory semiconductors, processors, microcontrollers, systems-on-a-chip, and photonics
and integrated optical devices used in artificial intelligence. The FOX-CP system is a low-cost single-wafer compact test
solution for logic, memory and photonic devices and the newest addition to the FOX-P product family. The FOX WaferPak
Contactor contains a unique full wafer contactor capable of testing wafers up to 300mm that enables IC manufacturers to
perform test, burn-in, and stabilization of full wafers on the FOX-P systems. The FOX DiePak Carrier allows testing, burn-in,
and stabilization of singulated bare die and modules up to 1,024 devices in parallel per DiePak on the FOX-NP and FOX-XP
systems up to nine DiePaks at a time.
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
Semiconductor manufacturing is a complex, multi-step process, and defects or weaknesses that may result in the failure of a
semiconductor device may be introduced at any process step. Failures may occur immediately or at any time during the
operating life of the device, sometimes after several months of normal use. Semiconductor manufacturers rely on testing and
reliability screening to identify and eliminate defects that occur during the manufacturing process.
Testing and reliability screening involve multiple steps. The first set of tests is typically performed by semiconductor device
manufacturers before the processed semiconductor wafer is cut into individual die, in order to avoid the cost of packaging
defective die. This “wafer probe” testing can be performed on one or many die at a time, including testing the entire wafer at
once. Most leading-edge microprocessors, microcontrollers, digital signal processors, memory ICs, sensors, power and optical
5
devices (such as vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers, or VCSELs) then undergo an extensive reliability screening and stress
testing procedure known as burn-in or cycling, depending on the application. This can either be done at the wafer level, before
the die are packaged, or at the package level, after the die are packaged. The burn-in process screens for early failures by
operating the device at elevated voltages and temperatures, at up to 150 degrees Celsius (302 degrees Fahrenheit) or higher.
Depending upon the application, the burn-in times can range anywhere from minutes to hours or even days. A typical burn-in
system can process thousands of devices simultaneously. After burn-in, the devices undergo a final test process using automatic
test equipment, or testers. For example, this cycling process screens silicon carbide semiconductor devices used in electric
vehicle engine controller inverters and their corresponding on-board battery chargers for failure to meet current power loss and
leakage specifications, as well as endurance requirements.
MARKETS
The Company’s semiconductor test and reliability qualification solutions address multiple test and burn-in markets including
Silicon Carbide (SiC) and Gallium Nitride (GaN) devices for power semiconductors, electric vehicles, electric vehicle charging
infrastructure, solar and wind power, silicon photonics for data center infrastructure and worldwide 5G infrastructure, 2D/3D
sensors for consumer electronics and automotive applications, the data storage and memory and artificial intelligence markets.
Power Semiconductors (Silicon Carbide and Gallium Nitride)
Silicon carbide power semiconductors have emerged as the preferred technology for battery electric vehicle power conversion
in on-board and off-board electric vehicle battery chargers, and the electric power conversion and control of the electric
engines. These devices reduce power loss by as much as greater than 75% over power silicon alternatives like IGBT (Insulated-
Gate Bipolar Transistor) devices, which has essentially changed the entire market dynamic. With the power efficiency
advantages of SiC, the Company sees most, if not every electric vehicle automotive company moving to silicon carbide-based
powertrain and charging systems in the near future.
The gallium nitride market appears to be a potentially significant growth driver for our systems and WaferPak full wafer
contactors, particularly for automotive, photovoltaic and other industrial applications where burn-in appears to be critical for
meeting the initial quality and reliability needs of those markets.
The Company’s FOX-P family of products are cost-effective solutions to help ensure the critical quality and reliability of
devices in this market, where quality and reliability can provide assurance against failure of a vehicle whose power
semiconductor fails in the power drive train.
Silicon Photonics
The silicon photonics market is seeing increasing deployment of devices used in the expansion of bandwidth and infrastructure
to meet the explosive growth of data center and 5G infrastructure.
The rapid growth of integrated optical devices in data centers and data center interconnect infrastructure, mobile devices,
automotive applications, and wearable biosensor markets is driving substantially higher requirements for initial quality and
long-term reliability, and they are increasing with every new product generation. The application of silicon photonics integrated
circuits for use in optical chip-to-chip communication in addition to the current photonics as multiple companies have made
announcements regarding their product roadmaps for co-packaged photonics integrated circuits with microprocessors, graphics
processors, chip sets for computing as well as artificial intelligence applications.
Silicon photonics devices are highly integrated silicon-based semiconductors that have embedded or integrated the non-silicon-
based laser transmitters and receivers to enable a smaller, lower cost, higher reliable alternative to traditional fiber optic
transceivers currently used in data center and telecommunication infrastructure. These require a process step in manufacturing
called stabilization where the devices are subjected to high temperatures and power to stabilize their output power. The
Company’s solution makes it feasible to burn-in integrated silicon photonics devices while still in wafer form without adding
the cost to the transceiver printed circuit board and other mechanical infrastructure of the final transceiver module, and that has
both yield and significant cost savings. In the case of silicon photonics, the laser devices are bonded directly to a silicon-based
device that has all the logic multiplexing and de-multiplexing, and other high-speed communication subsystems, all integrated
into a silicon-based integrated circuit.
Data Storage and Memory
The Company also sees new developments in the data storage and memory markets as new opportunities for its systems where
these end markets and customers require devices to have extremely high levels of quality and long-term reliability. One of the
6
market opportunities for wafer level burn-in is semiconductors used in Hard Disk drives for data storage. The NAND Flash
market implements 100% test and burn-in of devices to be used in mission critical applications such as enterprise storage. The
Company sees NAND Flash market as an opportunity for our fully automated systems and WaferPaks with long term potential
to also move into DRAM wafer level test and burn-in.
Artificial intelligence
The artificial intelligence (AI) processor market is experiencing a significant surge, driven by the increasing demand for
machine learning and AI applications. Semiconductor companies are continuously innovating and releasing new AI chips to
meet this demand. The production of AI processor wafers has seen substantial growth, with companies shipping millions of
devices.
As the AI processor market grows, the Company sees the need for burn-in becoming increasingly important. AI Processors
distinct architecture of die-to-die interdependency and increased memory size and use create a unique opportunity for the
Company to apply enabling wafer level test and burn-in technology for its customers and potential future customers. Subjecting
the AI processors under stress to eliminate potential failures before they are deployed is crucial as they are often used in critical
applications where failure can have significant consequences. Therefore, as the AI chip market continues to expand, the
importance of robust and efficient burn-in processes cannot be overstated. These processes work to ensure the reliability and
longevity of AI chips, thereby helping to contribute to the overall growth and success of the AI industry.
Mobile 2D and 3D Sensors
Sensors used in mobile devices such as smartphones, tablets, wearables such as watches and fitness bands, and audio devices
have become pervasive. Initially, sensors on smartphones allowed basic functions we have all come to expect such as
touchscreens, rotational sensors, and fingerprint sensors, but have gotten more complex with added capabilities such as 3D
facial recognition and time of flight distance measurements. We will see the addition of health monitoring sensors, 3D
measurement capability, and other advanced sensors in the future. As sensors become more pervasive and add critical new
functionality to devices, it becomes increasingly important that the data collected be accurate and reliable, which we believe
will drive requirements for our solutions for production test and burn-in of these sensors.
Automotive Semiconductors
In addition, the rapid growth and increasing demand for reliability in automotive sensor technologies is a key market driver for
the Company. These technologies include ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems) capabilities such as collision
avoidance systems using laser, LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), and RADAR (Radio Detection and Ranging) or other
sensing technologies. More and more new vehicles now include as standard capabilities collision avoidance systems that detect
obstacles and monitor the vehicle’s surroundings to notify the driver of dangerous conditions and take evasive action. In
addition to autonomous vehicles that require extremely high reliability of the devices in these systems, more and more vehicles
around the world are embedding these systems and sensors into their everyday driving features. The Company sees the rising
tide of the increasing number of embedded sensors and electrical and optical systems in vehicles as a key driver of the
increasing market need for reliable semiconductors. This, in turn, is increasing the need for 100% production test and burn-in of
devices to lower the infant mortality rate of devices and ensure that these devices and systems operate over the life of the
vehicles.
PRODUCTS
The Company manufactures and markets full wafer contact test systems, test during burn-in systems, test fixtures and related
accessories.
All of the Company’s systems are platform-based systems with a portfolio of current, voltage, digital and thermal capabilities,
allowing them to be configured with optional features to meet customer requirements. Systems can be configured for use in
production applications, where capacity, throughput and price are most important, or for reliability engineering and quality
assurance applications, where performance and flexibility, such as extended temperature ranges, are essential.
The Company’s product portfolio is platform-based systems with a modular configurable approach to enable a broad market
approach while leveraging refined high-quality modules as building blocks. The platform-based system enables the optimized
configuration for the market, application or specific customer requirement. Modules and configurability provide a range of
current and voltage selections over a range of power and thermal capacities while enabling digital control for each unique
device requirement. Implementing this approach along with our proprietary full wafer contactors and device interface carriers
7
provides our customers with the ability to configure a system for engineering characterization and reliability qualification and
high-volume production applications.
Full Wafer Contact Systems
Aehr’s FOX-XP test and burn-in platform allows for reliability screening tests to be completed on an entire wafer full of
devices, testing all of them at once or multiple touchdowns, while also testing and monitoring every device for failures during
the burn-in process to provide critical information on those devices. This is an enormously valuable capability, as it screens out
devices that would otherwise fail after they are packaged into multi-die modules where the yield impact could be 10 times or
even 100 times as costly.
The FOX-XP test and burn-in system, introduced in July 2016, is designed for devices in wafer, singulated die, and module
form that require test and burn-in times typically measured in hours to days. The FOX-XP system can test and burn-in up to 18
wafers at a time. For high reliability applications, such as automotive, mobile devices, networking, telecommunications,
sensors, power and solid-state devices, the FOX-XP system is a cost-effective solution for producing tested and burned-in die
for use in multi-chip packages. Using Known-Good Die, or KGD, which are fully burned-in and tested die, in multi-
chip/heterogeneous packages assures the reliability of the final product and lowers costs by increasing the yield of high-cost
multi-chip packages. Wafer-level burn-in and test enables lower cost production of KGD for multi-chip modules, 3-D stacked
packages and systems-in-a-package. The FOX-XP platform has been extended for burn-in and test of small multi-die modules
by using DiePak Carriers. The DiePak Carrier with its multi-module sockets and high wattage dissipation capabilities has a
capacity of hundreds of die or modules, much higher than the capacity of a traditional burn-in system with traditional single-
device sockets and heat sinks.
The FOX-NP is a low-cost entry-level system to provide a configuration and price point for companies to initiate a new product
introduction and production qualification, enabling an easier transition to the FOX-XP system for high volume production test.
The FOX-NP system is 100% compatible with the FOX-XP system and is configurable with up to two slot assemblies per
system compared to up to 18 slot assemblies in the FOX-XP system.
The FOX-CP is a low-cost single-wafer compact test and reliability verification solution for logic, memory, power and photonic
devices. The FOX-CP reduces test cost by functionally testing wafers during reliability screening to identify failing logic,
memory, power or photonic die before the die are integrated into their final package, and is optimal for test times ranging from
minutes to a few hours or where multiple touchdowns are required to test the entire wafer. The FOX-CP includes an integrated
prober which is equipped with optics for automatic pattern recognition so that the wafer is aligned properly for the testing
process. It complements the capabilities of the FOX-XP and FOX-NP systems, which are optimal when the test time is
measured in hours or days and the full wafer can be tested in a single touchdown.
One of the key components of the FOX systems is the patented WaferPak Contactor. The WaferPak Contactor contains a full-
wafer single-touchdown probe card which is easily removable from the system. Traditional probe cards often are only able to
contact a portion of the wafer, requiring multiple touchdowns to test the entire wafer. Traditional probe cards also require the
use of a dedicated wafer prober handler for each wafer in order to press the wafer up to make contact with the probe card. The
need for a wafer prober per wafer is a significant cost adder to the cost of testing a wafer, and also creates the need for
significant clean room space to facilitate the footprint of a wafer prober per wafer. The unique design of the WaferPak as well
as the FOX-XP and FOX-NP systems remove the need for a dedicated wafer prober per wafer, allowing for better utilization of
clean room space. A single FOX-XP system with a set of WaferPak Contactors can test up to 18 wafers at a time in the same
footprint as a single-wafer wafer prober and test system offered by Aehr’s competitors. The WaferPak Contactor is intended to
accommodate a wide range of contactor technologies so that the contactor technology can evolve along with the changing
requirements of the customer’s wafers. The WaferPak Contactors are custom designed for each device type, each of which has
a typical lifetime of two to seven years, depending on the device life cycle. Therefore, multiple sets of WaferPak Contactors
could be purchased over the life of a FOX system.
Another key component of the FOX-XP and FOX-NP systems is the patented DiePak Carrier. The DiePak Carrier, which is
easily removable from the system, contains many multi-module or die sockets with very fine-pitch probes. Traditional sockets
contact only a single device, requiring multiple large numbers of sockets and burn-in boards to test a production lot of devices.
The unique design accommodates a wide range of socket sizes and densities so that the DiePak Carrier technology can evolve
along with the changing requirements of the customer’s devices. The DiePak Carriers are custom designed for each device type,
each of which has a typical lifetime of two to seven years, depending on the device life cycle. Therefore, multiple sets of
DiePak Carriers could be purchased over the life of a FOX-XP or FOX-NP system.
Another key component of our FOX-XP and FOX-NP and test solution is the WaferPak Aligner. The WaferPak Aligner
performs alignment of the customer’s wafer to the WaferPak Contactor so that the wafer can be tested and burned-in by the
8
FOX-XP and FOX-NP systems. The Company offers an automated aligner for high volume production applications, which can
support several FOX-XP or FOX-NP systems or can be connected to a FOX-XP resulting in a fully integrated automated test
cell, and a manual aligner for low volume production or engineering applications. The latest generation Automated WaferPak
Aligner supports industry standard Automated Material Handling System (AMHS), Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV),
Overhead Hoist Transfer (OHT) and SEMI Equipment Communication Standard (SECS) and Generic Equipment Mode (GEM)
Semi E84 factory integration enabling “Lights-out” fully automated wafer handling. Supporting a wide range of wafer sizes
(e.g. 100/200/300mm) allows a broad range of customers to implement fully automated wafer level test and burn-in factories.
Similar to the WaferPak Aligner for WaferPak Contactors, the Company offers the DiePak Loader for DiePak Carriers. The
DiePak Loader performs automatic loading of the customer’s modules to the DiePak Carrier so that the modules can be tested
and burned-in by the FOX-XP and FOX-NP system. Typically, one DiePak Loader can support several FOX-XP or FOX-NP
systems.
Net revenues of full wafer contact product lines, systems, WaferPak Contactors, DiePak Carriers and services for fiscal 2024,
2023, and 2022 were $64.6 million, $63.5 million, and $48.9 million, respectively, and accounted for approximately 98%, 98%,
and 96% of the Company’s net revenues in fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
Systems For Packaged Parts
Test during burn-in, or TDBI, systems consist of several subsystems: pattern generation and test electronics, control software,
network interface and environmental chamber. The test pattern generator allows duplication of most of the functional tests
performed by a traditional tester. Pin electronics at each burn-in board (BIB), position are designed to provide accurate signals
to the ICs being tested and detect whether a device is failing the test.
Devices being tested are placed on BIBs and loaded into environmental chambers which typically operate at temperatures from
25 degrees Celsius (77 degrees Fahrenheit) up to 150 degrees Celsius (302 degrees Fahrenheit). Using our optional chambers,
our systems can produce temperatures as low as -55 degrees Celsius (-67 degrees Fahrenheit). A single BIB can hold up to
several hundred integrated circuits (“ICs”), and a production chamber holds up to 72 BIBs, resulting in thousands of memory or
logic devices being tested in a single system.
The Advanced Burn-in and Test System, or ABTS, was introduced in fiscal 2008. Several updates to the ABTS system have
been made since its introduction, including the ABTS-P system released in 2012. The ABTS family of products is based on a
hardware and software architecture that is intended to address not only today’s devices, but also future devices for many years
to come. The ABTS system can test and burn-in both high-power logic and low-power ICs. It can be configured to provide
individual device temperature control for devices up to 70W or more and with up to 320 I/O channels. The ABTS system is
nearing the end of its lifecycle and limited shipments are expected in the future.
Net revenues of packaged part product lines, systems and services for fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022 were $1.6 million, $1.4
million, and $1.9 million, respectively, and accounted for approximately 2%, 2%, and 4% of the Company’s net revenues in
fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
CUSTOMERS
The Company markets and sells its products throughout the world to semiconductor manufacturers, semiconductor contract
assemblers, electronics manufacturers and burn-in and test service companies.
Revenues from the Company’s five largest customers accounted for approximately 93%, 97%, and 98% of its net revenues in
fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively. During fiscal 2024, two customers accounted for approximately 67% and 17% of the
Company’s net revenues. During fiscal 2023, two customers accounted for approximately 79% and 10% of the Company’s net
revenues. During fiscal 2022, one customer accounted for approximately 82% of the Company’s net revenues. No other
customers accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s net revenues for any of these periods. The Company expects that
sales of its products to a limited number of customers will continue to account for a high percentage of net revenues for the
foreseeable future. In addition, revenues from significant customers may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. Such
fluctuations may result in changes in the utilization of the Company’s facilities and resources. The loss of or reduction or delay
in orders from a significant customer or a delay in collecting or failure to collect accounts receivable from a significant
customer could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and operating results.
9
MARKETING, SALES AND CUSTOMER SUPPORT
The Company has sales and service operations in the United States, Germany, the Philippines and Taiwan, dedicated sales and
service resources in China and South Korea, and has established a network of distributors and sales representatives in certain
key parts of the world. See “Revenue Recognition” in Item 7 under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” for a further discussion of the Company’s relationship with distributors, and its effects on
revenue recognition.
The Company’s customer service and support program includes system installation, system repair, applications engineering
support, spare parts inventories, customer training and documentation. The Company has applications engineering and field
service personnel located near and sometimes co-located at our customers and includes resources at the corporate headquarters
in Fremont, California, at customer locations in Texas, at the Company’s subsidiaries in Germany and the Philippines, at its
branch office in Taiwan, and also through third-party agreements in China. The Company’s distributors provide applications
and field service support in other parts of the world. The Company customarily provides a warranty on its products. The
Company offers service contracts on its systems directly and through its subsidiaries, distributors and representatives. The
Company believes that maintaining a close relationship with customers and providing them with ongoing engineering support
improves customer satisfaction and will provide the Company with a competitive advantage in selling its products to the
Company’s customers.
BACKLOG
At May 31, 2024, the Company’s backlog was $7.3 million compared with $24.5 million at May 31, 2023. The Company’s
backlog consists of product orders for which confirmed purchase orders have been received and which are scheduled for
shipment within 12 months. Due to the possibility of customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellations and potential
delays in product shipments or development projects, the Company’s backlog as of a particular date may not be indicative of
net revenues for any succeeding period.
RESEARCH AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
The Company historically has devoted a significant portion of its financial resources to research and development programs
and expects to continue to allocate significant resources to these efforts. The Company’s research and development expenses
were $8.7 million, $7.1 million, $5.8 million during fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
The Company conducts ongoing research and development to design new products and to support and enhance existing product
lines. Building upon the expertise gained in the development of its existing products, the Company has developed the FOX
family of systems for performing test and burn-in of entire processed wafers, and burn-in of devices in singulated die and
module form, including the FOX-NP and FOX-CP systems released during fiscal 2019, and the Automated WaferPak Aligner
released during fiscal 2023. The Company is developing enhancements to wafer level burn-in products and our packaged parts,
intended to improve the capability and performance for testing and burn-in of future generation devices and provide the
flexibility in a wide variety of applications.
MANUFACTURING
The Company assembles its products from components and parts manufactured by others, including environmental chambers,
power supplies, metal fabrications, printed circuit assemblies, ICs, burn-in sockets, high-density interconnects, wafer contactors
and interconnect substrates. The Company’s strategy is to use in-house manufacturing only when necessary to protect a
proprietary process or when a significant improvement in quality, cost or lead time can be achieved and relies on subcontractors
to manufacture many of the components and subassemblies used in its products. Final assembly and testing are performed at the
Company’s principal manufacturing facility located in Fremont, California.
COMPETITION
The semiconductor equipment industry is intensely competitive. Significant competitive factors in the semiconductor
equipment market include price, technical capabilities, quality, flexibility, automation, cost of ownership, reliability,
throughput, product availability and customer service. In each of the markets it serves, the Company faces competition from
established competitors and potential new entrants, many of which have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and
marketing resources than the Company.
10
The Company expects its competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and to introduce new
products with improved price and performance characteristics. New product introductions by the Company’s competitors or by
new market entrants could cause a decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of the Company’s products. The Company has
observed price competition in the systems market, particularly with respect to its less advanced products. Increased competitive
pressure could also lead to intensified price-based competition, resulting in lower prices which could adversely affect the
Company’s operating margins and results. The Company believes that to remain competitive it must invest significant financial
resources in new product development and expand its customer service and support worldwide. There can be no assurance that
the Company will be able to compete successfully in the future.
PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
The Company relies primarily on the technical and creative ability of its personnel, its proprietary software, and trade secrets
and copyright protection, rather than on patents, to maintain its competitive position. The Company’s proprietary software is
copyrighted and licensed to the Company’s customers. As of May 31, 2024, the Company held more than 110 active patents in
the United States, Singapore, China, Japan, Korea, and other countries, with expiration date ranges from 2024 to 2041, and had
several additional United States patent applications and foreign patent applications pending.
The Company’s ability to compete successfully is dependent in part upon its ability to protect its proprietary technology and
information. Although the Company attempts to protect its proprietary technology through patents, copyrights, trade secrets and
other measures, there can be no assurance that these measures will be adequate or that competitors will not be able to develop
similar technology independently. Further, there can be no assurance that claims allowed on any patent issued to the Company
will be sufficiently broad to protect the Company’s technology, that any patent will be issued to the Company from any pending
application or that foreign intellectual property laws will protect the Company’s intellectual property. Litigation may be
necessary to enforce or determine the validity and scope of the Company’s proprietary rights, and there can be no assurance that
the Company’s intellectual property rights, if challenged, will be upheld as valid. Any such litigation could result in substantial
costs and diversion of resources and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and
operating results, regardless of the outcome of the litigation. In addition, there can be no assurance that any of the patents issued
to the Company will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted thereunder will provide
competitive advantages to the Company. Also, there can be no assurance that the Company will have the financial resources to
defend its patents from infringement or claims of invalidity.
As of May 31, 2024, there were no pending claims against the Company regarding infringement of any patents or other
intellectual property rights of others. However, the Company may, from time to time, receive communications from third
parties asserting intellectual property claims against the Company. Such claims could include assertions that the Company’s
products infringe, or may infringe, the proprietary rights of third parties, requests for indemnification against such infringement
or suggest the Company may be interested in acquiring a license from such third parties. There can be no assurance that any
such claim made in the future will not result in litigation, which could involve significant expense to the Company, and, if the
Company is required or deems it appropriate to obtain a license relating to one or more products or technologies, there can be
no assurance that the Company would be able to do so on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG)
Environmental
The Company focuses on clean technology such as the electrical vehicle (“EV”) and power semiconductors market. EV and
power semiconductor revenues accounted for 92%, 85%, and 82% of total revenues in fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022,
respectively. We engineer our products to be more energy efficient by using more efficient electrical designs and thermally
efficient cooling architectures using conductive heat transfer versus convection air cooled methods. Our technology and
architectural design allow our products to take up only 5% of the test floor space compared to competitor’s products.
The Company improved its facilities by replacing existing air conditioners and heat exchanger with higher efficiency units that
draw less power and produce less wasted energy. Our headquarters facility upgrades include moving to high efficiency lighting,
modernizing our electrical power and cooling infrastructure, and adding Electric Vehicle charging stations for employees,
vendors, and customers.
Social
The Company reviews hiring and turnover quarterly and performs annual salary reviews, using independent third-party data, to
ensure competitive compensation practices. The Company conducts annual employee surveys to evaluate employee
satisfaction. Glassdoor shows the Company at a 4.2 out of 5 rating as a great place to work.
11
The Company provides variable compensation on top of base salary for all employees including an employee profit sharing
plan. The Company also provides equity awards including stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and participation in an
employee stock purchase plan for regular full-time (“RFT”) employees, located in the U.S. The Company is restricted from
issuing stock options or RSUs to non-U.S. employees in certain countries due to local regulations. For those employees who are
unable to participate in the Company’s equity incentive plan, the Company maintains a stock appreciation bonus program to
provide compensation linked to the Company’s stock price during a predetermined period. The Company also provides a
401(k) plan, and a non-contributory Employee Stock Ownership plan, for U.S. employees.
The Company provides recurring training in compliance with State of California regulations including sexual harassment,
prevention of violence in the workplace, and Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion (“DEI”) training. The Company promotes
employee engagement through corporate events or activities on a regular basis.
The Company provides health care coverage for all RFT employees, life insurance, continuing education assistance, and
reimbursement of U.S. employee health club membership. The Company ensures compliance with International Organization
for Standardization (“ISO”) certification and maintains safety training.
Governance
The Company’s Board satisfies the diversity objectives of Nasdaq Rule 5605(1)(2) for Smaller Reporting Companies with two
directors who identify as female, representing 33% of the total six Board members. The Board members also include
individuals with Native American origin and multi-ethnicity. As the Company pursues future Board recruitment efforts, the
Nominating Committee will continue to seek candidates who can contribute to the diversity of views and perspectives of the
Board. This includes seeking out individuals of diverse ethnicities, a balance in terms of gender, and individuals with diverse
perspectives informed by other personal and professional experiences.
All employees and Board members sign a Code of Conduct and Ethics Policy, and Insider Trading Policy upon hire. All
employees are provided with the employee handbook which addresses Sexual Harassment, Confidentiality, and Electronic Use
Policy among others. Each of the Company’s directors and officers completes a Director and Officer Questionnaire to identify
conflicts of interest or areas of concern. The Company also maintains Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance
Committees to provide corporate oversight.
HUMAN CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of May 31, 2024, the Company, including its foreign subsidiaries and one branch office, employed 115 persons collectively,
on a regular full-time basis, of whom 28 were engaged in research, development and related engineering, 39 were engaged in
manufacturing, 33 were engaged in marketing, sales and customer support and 15 were engaged in general administration,
finance and IT functions. In addition, the Company from time to time employs a few contractors, temporary, and part-time
employees, particularly to perform customer support and manufacturing.
The Company’s employees are dispersed across principal offices in the United States, Germany, Taiwan, and the Philippines. In
addition, our service and support organization has employees located worldwide, at or near customer facilities, to provide
timely customer response. As of May 31, 2024 regular full-time employees were located in the following geographic areas: 83
in United States, 25 in the Philippines, five in Taiwan and two in Germany.
The Company’s success is in part dependent on its ability to attract and retain highly skilled workers, who are in high demand.
None of the Company’s employees are represented by a union and the Company has never experienced a work stoppage due to
strike. The Company’s management considers its relations with its employees to be good. The Company regularly evaluates its
ability to attract and retain its employees. The Company has had relatively low turnover rates within its workforce, with 51% of
its regular full-time workforce being with the Company for 5 years or more.
The Company believes that the investments we make in driving a strong, values-based culture and supporting its employees
through programs, development, and competitive pay enhances its organizational capability. The Company’s management
reviews retention and turnover data, employee communications, performance review status, and compensation and benefits to
identify potential issues or opportunities for improvement on a quarterly basis. The Company periodically performs employee
surveys to monitor employee satisfaction and the Company follows up with an action planning process to actively respond to
employee feedback.
BUSINESS SEGMENT DATA AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
12
The Company operates in one business segment, the designing, manufacturing, marketing and selling of advanced test and
burn-in products to the semiconductor manufacturing industry in several geographic areas. Selected financial information,
including net revenues and property and equipment, net for each of the last three fiscal years, by geographic area is included in
Part II, Item 8, Note 12, “Revenue” and Note 15, “Segment Information” and certain risks related to such operations are
discussed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, under the heading “We sell our products and services worldwide, and our business is
subject to risks inherent in conducting business activities in geographic regions outside of the United States.”
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Company’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “AEHR.” The Company’s annual
report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports that are
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act, are available free of charge through the Company’s website at www.aehr.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file them with, or furnish them to the SEC.
The SEC maintains an Internet site, www.sec.gov, that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other
information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
In addition, information regarding the Company’s code of conduct and ethics and the charters of its Audit, Compensation and
Nominating and Governance Committees, are available free of charge on the Company’s website listed above.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks described below. These risks are not the only risks that we may face. Additional risks
and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently deem immaterial, also may become important factors that affect
us. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and
adversely affected which could cause our actual operating results to differ materially from those indicated or suggested by
forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or presented elsewhere by management from time to
time.
Risks Related to our Business and Industry
We generate a large portion of our sales from a small number of customers. If we were to lose one or more of our large
customers, operating results could suffer dramatically.
The semiconductor manufacturing industry is highly concentrated, with a relatively small number of large semiconductor
manufacturers and contract test and assembly companies accounting for a substantial portion of the purchases of semiconductor
equipment. Sales to our five largest customers accounted for approximately 93%, 97%, and 98%, of our net sales in fiscal 2024,
2023, and 2022, respectively. During fiscal 2024, two customers accounted for approximately 67% and 17% of the Company’s
net sales. During fiscal 2023, two customers accounted for approximately 79% and 10% of our net sales. During fiscal 2022,
one customer accounted for approximately 82% of our net sales. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of our net
sales for any of these periods.
We expect that sales of our products to a limited number of customers will continue to account for a high percentage of our net
sales for the foreseeable future. In addition, sales to particular customers may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter.
The concentration of our customer base increases risks related to the financial condition of our customers, and the deterioration
in financial condition of a single customer or the failure of a single customer to perform its obligations could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flow. If any such customers change their business requirements or focus,
vendor selection, project prioritization, or purchasing behavior, or are parties to consolidation transactions, they may delay,
suspend, reduce or cancel their purchases of our products or services and our business, financial condition, and results of
operations may be adversely affected.
A substantial portion of our net sales is generated by relatively small volume, high value transactions.
We derive a substantial portion of our net sales from the sale of a relatively small number of systems with high dollar value. As
a result, the loss or deferral of a limited number of system sales could have a material adverse effect on our net sales and
operating results in a particular period. Most customer purchase orders are subject to cancellation or rescheduling by the
customer with limited penalties, and, therefore, backlog at any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for
any succeeding period. From time to time, cancellations and rescheduling of customer orders have occurred, and delays by our
suppliers in providing components or subassemblies to us have caused delays in our shipments of our own products. For
13
example, in the second and third quarters of 2024, we experienced significant delays in expected customer orders and an
increased frequency of customers rescheduling. There can be no assurance that we will not be materially adversely affected by
future cancellations or rescheduling by our customers or other delays in our shipments. For non-standard products where we
have not effectively demonstrated the ability to meet specifications in the customer environment, we defer revenue until we
have met such customer specifications. Any delay in meeting customer specifications could have a material adverse effect on
our operating results. A substantial portion of net sales typically are realized near the end of each quarter. A delay or reduction
in shipments near the end of a particular quarter, due, for example, to unanticipated shipment rescheduling, cancellations or
deferrals by customers, customer credit issues, unexpected manufacturing difficulties experienced by us or delays in deliveries
by suppliers, could cause net sales in a particular quarter to fall significantly.
The semiconductor equipment industry is intensely competitive. In each of the markets we serve, we face competition
from established competitors and potential new entrants, many of which have greater financial, engineering,
manufacturing and marketing resources than us.
Our FOX wafer-level and singulated die/module test and burn in systems face competition from larger systems manufacturers
that have significant technological know-how and manufacturing capability. Some users of our systems, such as independent
test labs, build their own burn-in systems, while others, particularly large IC manufacturers in Asia, acquire burn-in systems
from captive or affiliated suppliers. Our WaferPak products are facing and are expected to face increasing competition. Several
companies have developed or are developing full-wafer and single-touchdown probe cards. The Company expects that its
DiePak products for burning-in and testing multiple singulated die and small modules face significant competition. The
Company believes that several companies have developed or are developing products which are intended to enable test and
burn-in of multiple bare die, and small modules.
We expect our competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and to introduce new products with
improved price and performance characteristics. New product introductions by our competitors or by new market entrants could
cause a decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of our products. We have observed price competition in the systems
market, particularly with respect to its less advanced products. Increased competitive pressure could also lead to intensified
price-based competition, resulting in lower prices which could adversely affect our operating margins and results. We believe
that to remain competitive we must invest significant financial resources in new product development and expand our customer
service and support worldwide. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in the future.
We rely on increasing market acceptance for our FOX system, and we may not be successful in attracting new
customers or maintaining our existing customers.
A principal element of our business strategy is to increase our presence in the test equipment market through system sales in our
FOX wafer-level and singulated die/module test and burn-in product family. Market acceptance of the FOX system is subject to
a number of risks. Before a customer incorporates the FOX system into a production line, lengthy qualification and correlation
tests must be performed. We anticipate that potential customers may be reluctant to change their procedures in order to transfer
burn-in and test functions to the FOX system. Initial purchases are expected to be limited to systems used for these
qualifications and for engineering studies. Market acceptance of the FOX system also may be affected by a reluctance of IC
manufacturers to rely on relatively small suppliers such as us. As is common with new complex products incorporating leading-
edge technologies, we may encounter reliability, design and manufacturing issues as we begin volume production and initial
installations of FOX systems at customer sites. The failure of the FOX system to achieve increased market acceptance would
have a material adverse effect on our future operating results, long-term prospects and our stock price.
We may experience increased costs associated with new product introductions.
As is common with new complex products incorporating leading-edge technologies, we have encountered reliability, design
and manufacturing issues as we begin volume production and initial installations of certain products at customer sites. Some of
these issues in the past have been related to components and subsystems supplied to us by third parties who have in some cases
limited the ability of us to address such issues promptly. This process in the past required and in the future is likely to require us
to incur un-reimbursed engineering expenses and to experience larger than anticipated warranty claims which could result in
product returns. In the early stages of product development there can be no assurance that we will discover any reliability,
design and manufacturing issues or, that if such issues arise, that they can be resolved to the customers’ satisfaction or that the
resolution of such problems will not cause us to incur significant development costs or warranty expenses or to lose significant
sales opportunities.
Our industry is subject to rapid technological change and our ability to remain competitive depends on our ability to
introduce new products in a timely manner.
14
The semiconductor equipment industry is subject to rapid technological change and new product introductions and
enhancements. Our ability to remain competitive depends in part upon our ability to develop new products and to introduce
them at competitive prices and on a timely and cost-effective basis. Our success in developing new and enhanced products
depends upon a variety of factors, including product selection, timely and efficient completion of product design, timely and
efficient implementation of manufacturing and assembly processes, product performance in the field and effective sales and
marketing. Because new product development commitments must be made well in advance of sales, new product decisions
must anticipate both future demand and the technology that will be available to satisfy that demand. Furthermore, introductions
of new and complex products typically involve a period in which design, engineering and reliability issues are identified and
addressed by our suppliers and by us. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in selecting, developing,
manufacturing and marketing new products that satisfy market demand. Any such failure would materially and adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because of the complexity of our products, significant delays can occur between a product’s introduction and the
commencement of the volume production of such product. We have experienced, from time to time, significant delays in the
introduction of, and technical and manufacturing difficulties with, certain of our products and may experience delays and
technical and manufacturing difficulties in future introductions or volume production of our new products. Our inability to
complete new product development, or to manufacture and ship products in time to meet customer requirements would
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed to cybersecurity threats or incidents.
We collect, maintain, and transmit data on information systems. These systems include those owned and maintained by the
Company or by third parties. In addition, we use cloud-based enterprise resource planning, ERP, software to manage the
business integrating all facets of operations, including manufacturing, finance, and sales and marketing. The data maintained on
these systems includes confidential and proprietary information belonging to us, our customers, suppliers, and others. While the
Company devotes significant resources to protect its systems and data from unauthorized access or misuse, we are exposed to
cybersecurity risks. Our systems are subject to computer viruses, data breach, phishing schemes, and other malicious software
programs or attacks. We have experienced cyber threats and incidents in the past. Although past threats and incidents have not
resulted in a material adverse effect, cybersecurity incidents may result in business disruption, loss of data, or unauthorized
access to intellectual property which could adversely affect our business.
A decrease in customer device failure rates and future changes in semiconductor technologies may result in a decrease
in demand for our products.
Customer tool utilization is driven by many factors including failure rates of customer devices. Improvements in yield may
result in customers decreasing test and burn-in times, or electing to perform sampling rather than 100% burn-in of their devices.
Based upon data obtained from our systems customers may revise internal manufacturing processes to decrease failure rates. A
decrease in customer quality targets or tool utilization may result in a decrease in demand for our products impacting our
business and results of operations.
Future improvements in semiconductor design and manufacturing technology may also reduce or eliminate the need for our
products. For example, improvements in semiconductor process technology and improvements in conventional test systems,
such as reduced cost or increased throughput, may significantly reduce or eliminate the market for one or more of our products.
If we are not able to improve our products or develop new products or technologies quickly enough to maintain a competitive
position in our markets, it could cause us to lose customers, substantially decrease or delay market acceptance and sales of our
products and services, and significantly harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
If we fail to operate our business in accordance with our business plan, our operating results, business and stock price
may be significantly and adversely impacted.
We attempt to operate our business in accordance with a business plan that is established annually, revised as appropriate, and
reviewed by management even more frequently. Our business plan is developed based on a number of factors, many of which
require estimates and assumptions, such as our expectations of the economic environment, future business levels, our
customers’ willingness and ability to place orders, lead-times, and future revenue and cash flow. Our budgeted operating
expenses, for example, are based in part on our future revenue expectations. However, our ability to achieve our anticipated
revenue levels is a function of numerous factors, including the volatile and historically cyclical nature of our primary industry,
customer order cancellations, macroeconomic changes, operational matters regarding particular agreements, our ability to
manage customer deliveries, the availability of resources for the installation of our products, delays or accelerations by
customers in taking deliveries and the acceptance of our products (for products where customer acceptance is required before
15
we can recognize revenue from such sales), our ability to operate our business and sales processes effectively, and a number of
the other risk factors as described in this Item 1A.
Because our expenses are in most cases relatively fixed in the short term, any revenue shortfall below expectations could have
an immediate and material adverse effect on our operating results. Similarly, if we fail to manage our expenses effectively or
otherwise fail to maintain rigorous cost controls, we could experience greater than anticipated expenses during an operating
period, which would also negatively affect our results of operations. If we fail to operate our business consistent with our
business plan, our operating results in any period may be materially and adversely impacted. Such an outcome could cause
customers, suppliers or investors to view us as less stable, or could cause us to fail to meet financial analysts’ revenue or
earnings estimates, any of which could have an adverse impact on our stock price.
In addition, our management is constantly striving to balance the requirements and demands of our customers with the
availability of resources, the need to manage our operating model and other factors. In furtherance of those efforts, we often
must exercise discretion and judgment as to the timing and prioritization of manufacturing, deliveries, installations and payment
scheduling. Any such decisions may impact our ability to recognize revenue, including the fiscal period during which such
revenue may be recognized, with respect to such products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations or stock price. Over the past year, the Company has increased inventory levels significantly. This decision was
driven by previously experienced long lead time in obtaining critical parts and in producing the systems and by higher projected
revenues. As a result, if actual revenues do not meet these projections, the Company may face challenges related to excess
inventory, including potential write-downs or obsolescence, which could adversely affect our financial results.
We are exposed to risks related to our commercial terms and conditions, including our indemnification of third parties,
as well as the performance of our products.
Although our standard commercial documentation sets forth the terms and conditions that we intend to apply to commercial
transactions with our business partners, counterparties to such transactions may not explicitly agree to our terms and conditions.
In situations where we engage in business with a third party without an explicit master agreement regarding the applicable
terms and conditions, or where the commercial documentation applicable to the transaction is subject to varying interpretations,
we may have disputes with those third parties regarding the applicable terms and conditions of our business relationship with
them. Such disputes could lead to a deterioration of our commercial relationship with those parties, costly and time-consuming
litigation, or additional concessions or obligations being offered by us to resolve such disputes, or could impact our revenue or
cost recognition. Any of these outcomes could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In addition, in our commercial agreements, from time to time in the normal course of business, we indemnify third parties with
whom we enter into contractual relationships, including customers, suppliers and lessors, with respect to certain matters.
We have agreed, under certain conditions, to hold these third parties harmless against specified losses, such as those arising
from a breach of representations or covenants, third party claims that our products, when used for their intended purposes,
infringe the IP rights of such third parties, or other claims made against certain parties. We may be compelled to enter into or
accrue for probable settlements of alleged indemnification obligations, or we may be subject to potential liability arising from
our customers’ involvements in legal disputes. In addition, notwithstanding the provisions related to limitations on our liability
that we seek to include in our business agreements, the counterparties to such agreements may dispute our interpretation or
application of such provisions, and a court of law may not interpret or apply such provisions in our favor, any of which could
result in an obligation for us to pay material damages to third parties and engage in costly legal proceedings. It is difficult to
determine the maximum potential amount of liability under any indemnification obligations, whether or not asserted, due to our
limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances that are likely to be involved in any
particular claim. Our business, financial condition and results of operations in a reported fiscal period could be materially and
adversely affected if we expend significant amounts in defending or settling any purported claims, regardless of their merit or
outcomes.
We are also exposed to potential costs associated with unexpected product performance issues. Our products and production
processes are extremely complex and, thus, could contain unexpected product defects, especially when products are first
introduced. Unexpected product performance issues could result in significant costs being incurred by us, including increased
service or warranty costs, providing product replacements for (or modifications to) defective products, litigation related to
defective products, reimbursement for damages caused by our products, product recalls, or product write-offs or disposal costs.
These costs could be substantial and could have an adverse impact upon our business, financial condition and operating results.
In addition, our reputation with our customers could be damaged as a result of such product defects, which could reduce
demand for our products and negatively impact our business.
16
We may not be able to successfully integrate and manage the acquired business.
Our success depends on our ability to continually enhance and broaden our product offerings in response to customer-
anticipated process changes, strategic opportunities for growth, and industry technology trends. We may choose to acquire new
and complementary businesses, products, technologies and/or services instead of developing them ourselves. If we are unable to
successfully integrate and manage acquired businesses, if the costs associated with integrating the acquired business exceeds
our expectations, or if acquired businesses perform poorly, then our business and financial results may suffer. It is possible that
the businesses we have acquired may perform worse than expected or prove to be more difficult to integrate and manage than
anticipated.
Operational and Other Risks
Supply chain issues, including a shortage of critical components or contract manufacturing capacity, could result in a
delay in fulfillment of customer orders, or an increase in costs, resulting in an adverse impact on our business and
operating results.
Our sales growth depends on our ability to obtain timely deliveries of parts from our suppliers and contract manufacturers. A
market shortage of semiconductor and other component supply could affect lead times, the cost of supply, and our ability to
meet customer demand for our products. While we have taken steps to obtain an assurance of supply from our key suppliers, the
market shortage of semiconductor supply may impact our ability to meet customer order fulfillments, or result in a significant
increase in costs of our inventories. Manufacturing issues or capacity problems experienced by our suppliers or contract
manufacturers could impact our ability to secure sufficient supply of critical components. If there is a market shortage of
semiconductor supply, suppliers and contract manufacturers may commit their capacity to others, limiting our supplies or
increasing costs. The failure to obtain timely delivery of supplies, or a significant increase in costs, could result in a material
impact in our business and results from operations.
We purchase materials from suppliers worldwide, which subjects the Company to increased risk.
We purchase components, sub-assemblies, and chambers from suppliers outside the United States. Increases in tariffs,
additional taxes, or trade barriers may result in an increase in our manufacturing costs. A decrease in the value of the U.S.
Dollar relative to foreign currencies would increase the cost of our materials. Should the Company increase its sales prices to
recover the increase in costs, this could result in a decrease in the competitiveness of our products. In addition, we are subject to
other risks associated with purchasing materials from suppliers worldwide. Government authorities may also implement
protectionist policies or impose limitations on the transfer of intellectual property. This may limit our ability to obtain products
from certain geographic regions and require us to identify and qualify new suppliers. The process of qualifying suppliers could
be lengthy, and no assurance can be given that any additional sources would be available to us on a timely basis. Changes in
trade relations, currency fluctuations, or protectionist policies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
We sell our products and services worldwide, and our business is subject to risks inherent in conducting business
activities in geographic regions outside of the United States.
Approximately 95%, 86%, and 90% of our net sales in fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively, were attributable to sales to
customers for delivery outside of the United States. We provide sales and service globally with resources in North America,
Taiwan, Germany, South Korea, and a service organization in the Philippines, as well as direct support through third party
agreements in China. We expect that sales of products for delivery outside of the United States will continue to represent a
substantial portion of our future sales. Our future performance will depend, in significant part, upon our ability to continue to
compete in foreign markets which in turn will depend, in part, upon a continuation of current trade relations between the United
States and foreign countries in which semiconductor manufacturers or assemblers have operations. A change toward more
protectionist trade legislation in either the United States or such foreign countries, such as a change in the current tariff
structures, export compliance or other trade policies, could adversely affect our ability to sell our products in foreign markets.
In addition, we are subject to other risks associated with doing business internationally, including longer receivable collection
periods and greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection, the burden of complying with a variety of foreign laws,
difficulty in staffing and managing global operations, risks of civil disturbance or other events which may limit or disrupt
markets, international exchange restrictions, changing political conditions and monetary policies of foreign governments.
Our net sales for fiscal 2024 were primarily denominated in U.S. Dollars. However, because a substantial portion of our net
sales is from sales of products for delivery outside the United States, an increase in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to
foreign currencies would increase the cost of our products compared to products sold by local companies in such markets. In
17
addition, since the price is determined at the time a purchase order is accepted, we are exposed to the risks of fluctuations in the
U.S. Dollar exchange rate during the lengthy period from the date a purchase order is received until payment is made. This
exchange rate risk is partially offset to the extent our foreign operations incur expenses in the local currency. To date, we have
not invested in any instruments designed to hedge currency risks. Our operating results could be adversely affected by
fluctuations in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to other currencies.
Global unrest may impact our ability to sell our products or obtain critical materials.
Global economic uncertainty and financial market volatility caused by political instability, changes in international trade
relationships and conflicts, such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the political climate in China and Taiwan, the
Israel-Hamas war, and escalating tensions in the Red Sea in connection with the attacks to disrupt shipments may result in
limited access to these markets for sales and material purchases. Periods of macroeconomic weakness or recession and
heightened market volatility caused by adverse geopolitical developments could increase these risks, potentially resulting in
adverse impacts on our business operations. Increased energy costs in Europe, resulting from Russia’s limiting energy supplies
in the region, may result in an economic downturn or an increase in the cost of materials. The on-going decline in relations
between the United States and China, and relations between China and Taiwan, may result in the imposition of trade restrictions
with China or Taiwan. While we have limited sales in Europe and Taiwan, and procurement from these regions, unrest in these
areas may result in a decrease in sales of our products, or an increase in costs of materials and services.
Our dependence on subcontractors and sole source suppliers may prevent us from delivering our products on a timely
basis and expose us to intellectual property infringement.
We rely on subcontractors to manufacture many of the components or subassemblies used in our products. Our FOX systems,
WaferPak Contactors, DiePak Carriers, WaferPak Aligners, and DiePak Loaders contain several components, including
environmental chambers, power supplies, high-density interconnects, wafer contactors, module contactors, signal distribution
substrates, and certain ICs that are currently supplied by only one or a limited number of suppliers. Our reliance on
subcontractors and single source suppliers involves a number of significant risks, including the loss of control over the
manufacturing process, the potential absence of adequate capacity and reduced control over delivery schedules, manufacturing
yields, quality and costs. In the event that any significant subcontractor or single source supplier is unable or unwilling to
continue to manufacture subassemblies, components or parts in required volumes, we would have to identify and qualify
acceptable replacements. The process of qualifying subcontractors and suppliers could be lengthy, and no assurance can be
given that any additional sources would be available to us on a timely basis. Any delay, interruption or termination of a supplier
relationship could adversely affect our ability to deliver products, which would harm our operating results.
Our suppliers manufacture components, tooling, and provide engineering services. During this process, our suppliers are
allowed access to our intellectual property. While we maintain patents to protect from intellectual property infringement, there
can be no assurance that technological information gained in the manufacture of our products will not be used to develop a new
product, improve processes or techniques which compete against our products. Litigation may be necessary to enforce or
determine the validity and scope of our proprietary rights, and there can be no assurance that our intellectual property rights, if
challenged, will be upheld as valid.
Tightening of fiscal monetary policy, and periodic economic and semiconductor industry downturns could negatively
affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The current economic conditions and uncertainty about future economic conditions, including volatility in the financial
markets, national debt, fiscal or monetary concerns, inflation and interest rates, bank failures, and economic recession, make it
challenging for us to forecast our operating results, make business decisions, and identify the risks that may affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations. The market for semiconductors and semiconductor capital equipment has
historically been cyclical, and we expect this trend to continue in the future. If we do not appropriately manage our business
operations in response to changing economic and industry conditions, it could have a material and adverse impact on our
business performance and financial condition.
Our net sales are affected by the cyclicality of the semiconductor market, which may have a material adverse impact on
our business performance and financial condition.
A significant portion of our business depends upon the capital expenditures of semiconductor manufacturers. Capital
expenditures by these companies depend upon, among other things, the current and anticipated market demand for
semiconductors and the products that utilize them. Typically, semiconductor manufacturers curtail capital expenditures during
periods of economic downturn. Conversely, semiconductor manufacturers increase capital expenditures when market demand
18
requires the addition of new or expanded production capabilities. This cyclicality may have a material adverse impact on our
business performance and financial condition.
We may be subject to litigation relating to intellectual property infringement which would be time-consuming,
expensive and a distraction from our business.
If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property, competitors may be able to use our proprietary information to erode
our competitive advantage, which could harm our business and operating results. Litigation may be necessary to enforce or
determine the validity and scope of our proprietary rights, and there can be no assurance that our intellectual property rights, if
challenged, will be upheld as valid. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could have a
material adverse effect on our operating results, regardless of the outcome of the litigation. In addition, there can be no
assurance that any of the patents issued to us will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted
thereunder will provide competitive advantages to us.
There are no pending claims against us regarding infringement of any patents or other intellectual property rights of others.
However, in the future we may receive communications from third parties asserting intellectual property claims against us.
Such claims could include assertions that our products infringe, or may infringe, the proprietary rights of third parties, requests
for indemnification against such infringement or suggestions that we may be interested in acquiring a license from such third
parties. There can be no assurance that any such claim will not result in litigation, which could involve significant expense to
us, and, if we are required or deem it appropriate to obtain a license relating to one or more products or technologies, there can
be no assurance that we would be able to do so on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
While we believe we have complied with all applicable environmental laws, our failure to do so could adversely affect
our business as a result of having to pay substantial amounts in damages or fees.
Federal, state and local regulations impose various controls on the use, storage, discharge, handling, emission, generation,
manufacture and disposal of toxic and other hazardous substances used in our operations. We believe that our activities
conform in all material respects to current environmental and land use regulations applicable to our operations and our current
facilities, and that we have obtained environmental permits necessary to conduct our business. Nevertheless, failure to comply
with current or future regulations could result in substantial fines, suspension of production, alteration of our manufacturing
processes or cessation of operations. Such regulations could require us to acquire expensive remediation equipment or to incur
substantial expenses to comply with environmental regulations. Any failure to control the use, disposal or storage of or
adequately restrict the discharge of, hazardous or toxic substances could subject us to significant liabilities.
The failure to successfully implement enterprise resource planning and other information systems changes could
adversely impact our business and operating results.
We periodically implement new or enhanced enterprise resource planning and related information systems in order to better
manage our business operations, align our global organizations and enable future growth. Implementation of new business
processes and information systems requires the commitment of significant personnel, training and financial resources, and
entails risks to our business operations. If we do not successfully implement enterprise resource planning and related
information systems improvements, or if there are delays or difficulties in implementing these systems, we may not realize
anticipated productivity improvements or cost efficiencies, and may experience interruptions in service and operational
difficulties, which could result in quality issues, reputational harm, lost market and revenue opportunities, and otherwise
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Ownership of our Common Stock
Our stock price is volatile.
Historically, our common stock has experienced substantial price volatility. For example, during the two-year period ended
May 31, 2024, the price of our common stock has ranged from $6.71 to $54.10. If our future operating results or margins are
below the expectations of stock market analysts or our investors, our stock price will likely decline. Factors such as
announcements of developments related to our business, fluctuations in our operating results, general conditions in the
semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industries as well as the worldwide economy, announcement of technological
innovations, new systems or product enhancements by us or our competitors, fluctuations in the level of cooperative
development funding, acquisitions, changes in governmental regulations, developments in patents or other intellectual property
rights and changes in our relationships with customers and suppliers could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate
substantially. In addition, in recent years the stock market in general, and the market for small capitalization and high
19
technology stocks in particular, have experienced extreme price fluctuations which have often been unrelated to the operating
performance of the affected companies. Such fluctuations could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Increased scrutiny and changing expectations from stakeholders with respect to the Company’s ESG practices may
result in additional costs or risks.
Companies across many industries are facing increasing scrutiny related to their ESG practices. Investor advocacy groups,
certain institutional investors, investment funds and other influential investors are also increasingly focused on ESG practices
and in recent years have placed increasing importance on the non-financial impacts of their investments. If our ESG practices
do not meet investor or other industry stakeholder expectations, which continue to evolve, we may incur additional costs and
our brand, ability to attract and retain qualified employees and business may be harmed.
Risks Related to our Financial/Legal/Organizational Structure
We depend on our key personnel and our success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented
employees.
Our success depends to a significant extent upon the continued service of Gayn Erickson, our President and Chief Executive
Officer, as well as other executive officers and key employees. We do not maintain key person life insurance for our benefit on
any of our personnel, and none of our employees are subject to a non-competition agreement with us. The loss of the services of
any of our executive officers or a group of key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and operating results. Our future success will depend in significant part upon our ability to attract, retain and
motivating highly skilled technical, management, sales and marketing personnel. There are a limited number of personnel with
the requisite skills to serve in these positions, and it has become increasingly difficult for us to hire such personnel. Competition
for such personnel in the semiconductor equipment industry is intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful
in attracting, retaining or motivating such personnel. Changes in management could disrupt our operations and adversely affect
our operating results.
If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, the accuracy and timing of our
financial reporting may be adversely affected.
We are required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The provisions of the act require, among other
things, that we maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. Preparing our
financial statements involves a number of complex processes, many of which are done manually and are dependent upon
individual data input or review. These processes include, but are not limited to, calculating revenue, deferred revenue and
inventory costs. While we continue to automate our processes and enhance our review and put in place controls to reduce the
likelihood for errors, we expect that for the foreseeable future, many of our processes will remain manually intensive and thus
subject to human error.
A change in accounting standards or practices or a change in existing taxation rules or practices (or changes in
interpretations of such standards, practices or rules) could have a significant effect on our reported results and may
affect reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective.
New accounting standards and taxation rules and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements and taxation rules have
occurred and will continue to occur in the future. Changes to (or revised interpretations or applications of) existing accounting
standards or tax rules or the questioning of current or past practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the
way we conduct our business. Adoption of new standards may require changes to our processes, accounting systems, and
internal controls. Difficulties encountered during adoption could result in internal control deficiencies or delay the reporting of
our financial results.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
ITEM 1C. Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy
We have established processes for assessing, identifying, and managing material risk from cybersecurity threats, and have
integrated these processes into our overall risk management systems and processes. To prevent, detect and respond to
20
information security threats, we maintain a cyber risk management program that employs Cyber Security Framework (“CSF”)
in accordance with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) security framework. CSF is a set of voluntary
guidelines that help organizations assess and improve their cybersecurity posture by implementing processes for identifying and
mitigating risk, and detecting, responding to and recovering from cyberattacks.
We conduct periodic risk assessments to identify cybersecurity threats, as well as assessments in the event of a material change
in our business practices that may affect information systems that are vulnerable to such cybersecurity threats. These risk
assessments include identification of reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks, the likelihood and potential damage that
could result from such risks, and the sufficiency of existing policies, procedures, systems, and safeguards in place to manage
such risks. Following these risk assessments, we re-design, implement, and maintain reasonable safeguards to minimize
identified risks; reasonably address any identified gaps in existing safeguards; and regularly monitor the effectiveness of our
safeguards.
Our Security Awareness Program includes training that reinforces our information technology risk and security management
policies, standards and practices, as well as the expectation that employees comply with these policies. The Security Awareness
Program engages personnel through training on how to identify potential cybersecurity risks and protect the Company’s
resources and information. This training is mandatory for all employees on a periodic basis, and it is supplemented by
Company-wide testing initiatives.
Our processes also address cybersecurity threat risks associated with our use of third-party service providers, including our
suppliers or who have access to our systems. In addition, cybersecurity considerations affect the selection and oversight of our
third-party service providers. We perform diligence on third parties that have access to our systems, data or facilities that house
such systems or data, and continually monitor cybersecurity threat risks identified through such diligence.
We have not identified risks from known cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any prior cybersecurity incidents, that
have materially affected us, including our operations, business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. We face
risks from cybersecurity threats that, if realized, are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our operations, business
strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. See “Risk Factors – We are exposed to cybersecurity threats or incidents.”
Cybersecurity Governance
One of the key functions of our Board of Directors is informed oversight of our risk management processes, including risks from
cybersecurity threats. Our Board of Directors is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure, and our
executive officers are responsible for the day-to-day management of the material risks we face. Our Board of Directors
administers its cybersecurity risk oversight function directly as a whole, as well as through the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors (the “Audit Committee”). The Audit Committee has primary responsibility for oversight of information security risks,
including fraud, vendor, data protection and privacy, business continuity and resilience, and cybersecurity risks, and provides
regular updates to the Board of Directors on such matters. The Audit Committee receives regular reports from our Chief Operating
Officer on, among other things, the Company’s cyber risks and threats, the status of projects to strengthen the Company’s
information security systems, assessments of the Company’s security program and the emerging threat landscape. Information
security risk is a significant oversight focus area for the Audit Committee, as well as the entire Board of Directors. Over the
course of fiscal year 2024, the Audit Committee received four separate cybersecurity briefings from our Chief Operating Officer.
Our Chief Operating Officer is primarily responsible for assessing and managing our material risks from cybersecurity threats.
Our Chief Operating Officer, who leads a team responsible for enterprise-wide cybersecurity strategy, policy, standards,
architecture and processes, has extensive experience and background in information technology, cybersecurity, enterprise
strategy, risk management. Additionally, our Chief Operating Officer chairs our Cybersecurity Incident Response Team, which
is responsible for prevention, identification, containment, eradication and remediation of cybersecurity incidents.
Item 2. Properties
The Company’s principal administrative and production facilities are located in Fremont, California, in a 51,289 square foot
building. The Company’s lease was renewed in December 2022 and expires in September 2030 with an option to extend the
lease for another five years. The Company leases a 492 square foot sales and support office in Utting, Germany. The lease,
which began February 1, 1992 and expires on January 31, 2025, contains an automatic twelve months renewal, at rates to be
determined, if no notice is given prior to six months from expiration. On November 18, 2020, the Company established a
wholly owned subsidiary, Aehr Test Systems Philippines Inc., which has been in full operation since March 2021. The
Company currently leases a facility in Philippines located in a 6,458 square foot building in Clark Freeport Zone, Pampanga.
The lease, amended in 2023, began November 1, 2023 and expires on June 30, 2029 with an option to renew for another three
or five years at the prevailing market rate. The Company periodically evaluates its global operations and facilities to bring its
21
capacity in line with demand and to provide cost-effective services for its customers. In prior years, through this process, the
Company has moved from certain facilities that exceeded the capacity required to satisfy its needs. The Company believes that
its existing facilities in Fremont, California are adequate to meet its current and reasonably foreseeable requirements. The
Company regularly evaluates its expected future facilities requirements and believes that alternate facilities would be available
if needed.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable
22
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
The Company’s common stock is publicly traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “AEHR”. The following
table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices for the common stock on such market. These quotations
represent prices between dealers and do not include retail markups, markdowns or commissions and may not necessarily
represent actual transactions.
High
Low
Fiscal 2024:
First quarter ended August 31, 2023
$
54.10
$
33.72
Second quarter ended November 30, 2023
53.06
21.57
Third quarter ended February 29, 2024
30.50
14.54
Fourth quarter ended May 31, 2024
18.63
10.19
Fiscal 2023:
First quarter ended August 31, 2022
$
19.43
$
6.71
Second quarter ended November 30, 2022
27.00
13.00
Third quarter ended February 28, 2023
37.57
17.05
Fourth quarter ended May 31, 2023
40.69
23.11
At July 16, 2024, the Company had 97 holders of record of its common stock. A substantially greater number of holders of the
Company’s common stock are “street name” or beneficial holders whose shares are held by banks, brokers and other financial
institutions.
The Company has not paid cash dividends on its common stock or other securities. The Company currently anticipates that it
will retain its future earnings, if any, for use in the expansion and operation of its business and does not anticipate paying any
cash dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future.
The Company did not repurchase any of its common stock in the open market during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024
because the Company does not have a stock repurchase plan.
Item 6. [Reserved]
23
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with
our “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Aehr Test Systems (“Aehr Test”, “Aehr”, the “Company” or “We”) is a leading provider of test solutions for testing, burning-
in, and stabilizing semiconductor devices in wafer level, singulated die, and package part form, and has installed thousands of
systems worldwide. Increasing quality, reliability, safety, and security needs of semiconductors used across multiple
applications, including electric vehicles, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, solar and wind power, computing, data and
telecommunications infrastructure, and solid-state memory and storage, are driving additional test requirements, incremental
capacity needs, and new opportunities for Aehr Test products and solutions.
We have developed and introduced several innovative products including the FOX-P family of test and burn-in systems and
FOX WaferPak Aligner, FOX WaferPak Contactor, FOX DiePak Carrier and FOX DiePak Loader. The FOX-XP and FOX-NP
systems are full wafer contact and singulated die/module test and burn-in systems that can test, burn-in, and stabilize a wide
range of devices such as leading-edge silicon carbide-based and other power semiconductors, 2D and 3D sensors used in
mobile phones, tablets, and other computing devices, memory semiconductors, processors, microcontrollers, systems-on-a-chip,
and photonics and integrated optical devices. The FOX-CP system is a low-cost single-wafer compact test solution for logic,
memory and photonic devices and the newest addition to the FOX-P product family. The FOX WaferPak Contactor contains a
unique full wafer contactor capable of testing wafers up to 300mm that enables Integrated Circuit manufacturers to perform
test, burn-in, and stabilization of full wafers on the FOX-P systems. The FOX DiePak Carrier allows testing, burning in, and
stabilization of singulated bare die and modules up to 1,024 devices in parallel per DiePak on the FOX-NP and FOX-XP
systems up to nine DiePaks at a time.
Our revenue consists primarily of sales of FOX-P systems, WaferPak Aligners and DiePak Loaders, WaferPak Contactors,
DiePak Carriers, test fixtures, upgrades and spare parts, service contracts revenues, and non-recurring engineering charges. Our
selling arrangements may include contractual customer acceptance provisions, which are mostly deemed perfunctory or
inconsequential, and installation of the product occurs after shipment, transfer of title and risk of loss.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“US GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenues, inventories,
and income taxes, among others. Our estimates are derived from historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Those results form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services by following a five-step
process: (1) identify the contract with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the
transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price, and (5) recognize revenue when or as the Company satisfies a performance
obligation, as further described below.
Performance obligations include sales of systems, contactors, spare parts, and services, as well as installation and training
services included in customer contracts. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation. In
determining the transaction price, the Company evaluates whether the price is subject to refund or adjustment to determine the
24
net consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled. The Company generally does not grant return privileges, except
for defective products during the warranty period.
For contracts that contain multiple performance obligations, the Company allocates the transaction price to the performance
obligations on a relative standalone selling price basis. Standalone selling prices are based on multiple factors including, but not
limited to, historical discounting trends for products and services and pricing practices in different geographies. Revenue for
systems and spares is recognized at a point in time, which is generally upon shipment or delivery and evidenced by transfer of
title and risk of loss to the customer. Revenue from services is recognized over time as the customer receives the benefit over
the contractual period of generally one year or less.
The Company has elected the practical expedient to not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component as the
Company’s standard payment terms are less than one year.
The Company sells its products primarily through a direct sales force. In certain international markets, the Company sells its
products through independent distributors.
Inventory Valuation
We write down the carrying value of our inventory to net realizable value for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable
inventory in an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and its estimated realizable value based upon
assumptions about future demand and market conditions. We assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials,
work-in-process, finished goods and spare parts on a periodic basis.
Obsolete inventory or inventory in excess of our estimated usage is written down to its estimated market value less costs to sell,
if less than its cost. The inventory write-downs are established on the basis of obsolete inventory or specifically identified
inventory in excess of established usage. Inherent in our estimates of demand and market value in determining inventory
valuation are estimates related to economic trends, market conditions, and future demand for our products. If actual demand and
market conditions are less favorable than our projections, additional inventory write-downs may be required. If the inventory
value is written down to its net realizable value, and subsequently there is an increased demand for the inventory at a higher
value, the increased value of the inventory is not realized until the inventory is sold either as a component of a system or as
separate inventory.
Income Taxes
The determination of our tax provision is highly dependent upon the geographic composition of worldwide earnings and tax
regulations governing each region and is subject to judgments and estimates. Management carefully monitors the changes in
many factors and adjusts the effective tax rate as required.
In the past, we assessed the likelihood that we would be able to recover our deferred tax assets. If recovery was not more likely
than not, we increased our provision for taxes by recording a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the
amount that was more likely than not to be recoverable. In determining whether the realization of these deferred tax assets
would be impaired, we made judgments with respect to whether we were likely to generate sufficient future taxable income to
realize these assets. In order to reverse the valuation allowance, management considered both positive and negative evidence
and determined that there was sufficient positive evidence to conclude that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets
will be realized. As a result, we released the entire valuation allowance in fiscal 2024 which contributed to the tax benefit of
approximately $20.7 million for the year ended May 31, 2024.
Results of Operations
Fiscal Year
Our fiscal year ended on May 31 for each of our fiscal years in 2024, 2023 and 2022. Beginning on June 1, 2024, we have
changed our fiscal year to the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Friday nearest May 31. Our first fiscal quarter in fiscal 2025
will end on August 30 and our fiscal year 2025 will end on May 30, 2025.
Discussion of Results of Operations
Revenues
25
Revenue by Category
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Products
61,729
$
60,717
$
47,871
$
1,012
$
1.7%
12,846
$
26.8%
Services
4,489
4,244
2,958
245
5.8%
1,286
43.5%
Total revenues
66,218
$
64,961
$
50,829
$
1,257
$
1.9%
14,132
$
27.8%
Products as a percentage of total revenues
93.2%
93.5%
94.2%
Services as a percentage of total revenues
6.8%
6.5%
5.8%
Year Ended May 31,
FY 2024 vs FY 2023
FY 2023 vs FY 2022
Revenue increased by $1.3 million in fiscal year 2024 over fiscal year 2023, primarily driven by higher sales in our contactors.
Our contactors revenue increased by $15.7 million, and our services revenue increased by $0.3 million. The increase was
partially offset by a decrease in systems revenue of $14.7 million.
Revenue increased by $14.1 million in fiscal year 2023 over fiscal year 2022, primarily due to the increases in revenue of our
wafer-level test products. Revenue of our wafer-level test products and services for fiscal 2023 were $63.5 million and
increased by $14.6 million from fiscal year 2022 due to strong demand for our FOX-P systems.
Revenue by Geography
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Asia
58,076
$
55,609
$
45,700
$
2,467
$
4.4%
9,909
$
21.7%
United States
3,532
9,289
5,110
(5,757)
(62.0%)
4,179
81.8%
Europe
4,610
63
19
4,547
N.M.
44
231.6%
Total revenues
66,218
$
64,961
$
50,829
$
1,257
$
1.9%
14,132
$
27.8%
Asia as a percentage of total revenues
87.7%
85.6%
89.9%
United States as a percentage of total revenue
5.3%
14.3%
10.1%
Europe as a percentage of total revenues
7.0%
0.1%
0.0%
FY 2024 vs FY 2023
FY 2023 vs FY 2022
Year Ended May 31,
N.M.-Not meaningful
On a geographic basis, revenues represent products that were shipped to or services that were performed at our customer
locations. For fiscal year 2024, total revenues increased compared to the same period in the prior year due to an increase in
international revenues as a result of more shipments to our customers in Asia and Europe, partially offset by the decline in
revenue from a customer in the United states.
For fiscal year 2023, both international revenue and domestic revenue increased, compared to the same period in the prior year.
Gross Margin
Gross Profit by Category
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Products
30,636
$
30,958
$
22,207
$
(322)
$
(1.0%)
8,751
$
39.4%
Services
1,907
1,788
1,458
119
6.7%
330
22.6%
Gross profit
32,543
$
32,746
$
23,665
$
(203)
$
(0.6%)
9,081
$
38.4%
Gross Margin by Category
Product
49.6%
51.0%
46.4%
Services
42.5%
42.1%
49.3%
Gross margin
49.1%
50.4%
46.6%
FY 2023 vs FY 2022
Year Ended May 31,
FY 2024 vs FY 2023
Gross profit decreased slightly for fiscal year 2024, compared to fiscal year 2023. Gross margin decreased to 49.1% in fiscal year
2024 from 50.4% in fiscal year 2023. The decrease in gross margin of 1.3% was primarily due to an increase in inventory reserves,
as well as an increase in costs from design changes.
26
Gross profit increased to $32.7 million for fiscal year 2023 from $23.7 million for fiscal year 2022. Gross margin increased to
50.4% in fiscal year 2023 from 46.6% in fiscal year 2022. The increase in gross margin of 3.8% was primarily the result of a
decrease in inventory reserve provisions, an increase in manufacturing efficiencies as a result of higher sales volume, and a
decrease in direct material costs.
Research and Development
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Research and development
8,719
$
7,134
$
5,818
$
1,585
$
22.2%
1,316
$
22.6%
As a percentage of total revenues
13.2%
11.0%
11.4%
FY 2023 vs FY 2022
Year Ended May 31,
FY 2024 vs FY 2023
Research and development expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits for product development personnel, outside
development service costs, travel expenses, facilities cost allocations, and stock-based compensation charges. Research and
development expenses increased by $1.6 million in fiscal year 2024 over fiscal year 2023 primarily due to higher employment-
related costs of $0.5 million because of an increase in headcount, higher non-recurring engineering services charges of $0.3
million, an increase in allocated facility cost of $0.3 million and an increase in recruiting expenses of $0.2 million.
Research and development expenses increased by $1.3 million in fiscal year 2023 over fiscal year 2022, primarily due to
increases in project expenses of $0.6 million and employment-related costs of $0.5 million related to research and development
initiatives during fiscal 2023.
Selling, General and Administrative
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Selling, general and administrative
13,746
$
12,237
$
10,047
$
1,509
$
12.3%
2,190
$
21.8%
As a percentage of total revenues
20.8%
18.8%
19.8%
FY 2023 vs FY 2022
FY 2024 vs FY 2023
Year Ended May 31,
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits for sales, marketing and general
and administrative personnel, legal and accounting service costs, marketing communications costs, travel expenses, facilities
cost allocations, and stock-based compensation charges. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.5 million
in fiscal year 2024 over fiscal year 2023, primarily due to higher employment-related cost of $1.3 million because of an increase
in headcount, and an increase in audit and legal service fees of $0.3 million.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $2.2 million in fiscal year 2023 over fiscal year 2022, primarily due
to increased shareholder related costs of $0.5 million, recruiting and relocation expenses of $0.3 million, employment-related
costs of $0.6 million because of an increase in headcount to support our growing business, audit and legal service fees of $0.3
million, and travel expenses of $0.2 million.
Interest and Other Income, Net
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Interest income
2,388
$
1,245
$
13
$
1,143
$
91.8%
1,232
$
N.M.
Gain from forgiveness of PPP loan
-
-
1,698
-
-
(1,698)
(100.0%)
Other income (expense), net
(8)
(3)
30
(5)
166.7%
(33)
(110.0%)
Interest and other income, net
2,380
$
1,242
$
1,741
$
1,138
$
91.6%
(499)
$
(28.7%)
Year Ended May 31,
FY 2023 vs FY 2022
FY 2024 vs FY 2023
N.M.-Not meaningful
Interest and other income, net, primarily consists of interest income, foreign currency transaction exchange gains and losses
and other income (expense). Interest and other income, net, increased by $1.1 million in fiscal year 2024 over fiscal year 2023,
primarily driven by higher interest income earned due to higher average cash and investment balances and higher yields from
our investments in money market funds.
27
Interest and other income, net, decreased by $0.5 million in fiscal year 2023 over fiscal year 2022, primarily due to the one-
time gain from forgiveness of Payroll Protection Program loan (“PPP Loan”) of $1.7 million in fiscal 2022. The decrease was
partially offset by higher interest income for the fiscal year 2023, driven by higher cash deposits and higher interest rates.
Provision for Income Taxes
(Dollars in thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Income tax expense (benefit)
(20,698)
$
60
$
91
$
(20,758)
$
N.M
(31)
$
(34.1%)
Year Ended May 31,
FY 2024 vs FY 2023
FY 2023 vs FY 2022
N.M.-Not meaningful
Income tax benefit was $20.7 million in fiscal year 2024, compared to income tax expense of $60 thousand in fiscal year 2023
and $91 thousand in fiscal year 2022. A significant income tax benefit in fiscal year 2024 was recognized primarily due to
release of a valuation allowance of $21.9 million, as management determined that there was sufficient positive evidence to
conclude that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized, which was partially offset by income tax
expense of $1.2 million in fiscal year 2024.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash were $49.3 million as of May 31, 2024, compared to $30.2 million as of May 31,
2023. Short term investments were $0 as of May 31, 2024, compared to $17.9 million as of May 31, 2023. We believe that
our existing cash resources and anticipated funds generated from operations will satisfy our cash requirements to fund our
operating activities, capital expenditures and other obligations for the next twelve months.
(In thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Operating activities
1,756
$
10,011
$
1,508
$
Investing activities
17,251
(18,656)
(416)
Financing activities
139
7,322
25,761
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
(41)
(37)
49
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
19,105
$
(1,360)
$
26,902
$
Year Ended May 31,
Net Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
Cash flow from operating activities during fiscal year 2024 mostly consisted of net income, adjusted for certain non-cash items
which primarily consisted of depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation expense and amortization of operating
lease right-of-use assets. The $8.3 million decrease in cash flows from operating activities for fiscal year 2024, compared to
fiscal year 2023, was driven primarily by an increase in cash used in inventory production and vendor payments due to
anticipated customer demand, lower net income after non-cash adjustments and a decrease in cash provided by deferred revenue
due to timing of customer deposits and revenue recognition, partially offset by an increase in cash provided by collection of
accounts receivable. The $8.5 million increase in cash flows from operating activities for fiscal year 2023, compared to fiscal
year 2022, was driven primarily by higher net income after non-cash adjustments, improved cash flow from collection of
accounts receivable and increase in accounts payable due to higher inventory purchases, partially offset by an increase in cash
used in inventory production and a decrease in cash provided by deferred revenue due to timing of customer deposits and
revenue recognition.
Net Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities was $17.3 million for fiscal year 2024, compared to net cash used in investing activities
of $18.7 million for fiscal year 2023. The increase was primarily due to the maturity of our short-term investments of $18.0
million during fiscal year 2024, while there was a net purchase of short-term investments of $17.3 million during fiscal year
2023, compared to no purchase or sale of short-term investments during fiscal year 2022. Capital expenditure in fiscal 2024,
2023 and 2022 was $0.7 million, $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Capital expenditure was primarily for acquisition
of testing equipment and manufacturing equipment.
28
Net Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities decreased to $0.1 million for fiscal year 2024, compared to $7.3 million and $25.8
million for fiscal years 2023 and 2022, respectively. For the fiscal years 2023 and 2022, net proceeds from the sale of our
common stock under our “At-the-Market” offering program were $6.8 million and $24.0 million, respectively, compared to no
such sales during fiscal year 2024. The proceeds from the issuance of common stock under employee stock plans in fiscal 2024,
2023 and 2022 were $1.8 million, $2.6 million and $3.6 million, respectively. Cash used in shares repurchased for tax
withholdings on vesting of restricted stock units in fiscal 2024, 2023 and 2022 were $1.6 million, $2.0 million and $0.4 million,
respectively. In fiscal 2022, the Company also repaid the line of credit of $1.4 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Financing
We have not entered into any off-balance sheet financing arrangements and have not established any special purpose or variable
interest entities.
Contractual Obligations
As of May 31, 2024, the Company’s unconditional purchase obligations, which have a remaining term in excess of 12 months,
are not material.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any,
on our consolidated financial statements, see Note 1, “Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
As a Smaller Reporting Company, we are not required to provide information under Item 7A.
29
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Financial Statements of Aehr Test Systems
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Firm ID 207)
30
Consolidated Balance Sheets at May 31, 2024 and 2023
32
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended May 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
33
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended May 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
34
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended May 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
35
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended May 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022
36
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
37
30
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
Aehr Test Systems
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aehr Test Systems and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of
May 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the
“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of the Company as of May 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended May 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to
the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement,
whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements,
whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial
statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or
disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or
complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated
financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate
opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Inventory Valuation – Adjustments for Excess or Obsolete Inventory
As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated inventories balance was $37.5
million as of May 31, 2024. The Company’s inventory is stated at the lower of cost, which is determined on a standard cost
basis on a first-in, first-out method, or net realizable value. The Company evaluates the net realizable value by considering
obsolescence, excessive levels of inventory, deterioration and other factors. Adjustments to reduce the cost of inventory to its
net realizable value, if required, are made for estimated excess, obsolescence or impaired inventory. If actual demand were to
be substantially lower than estimated, there could be a significant adverse impact on the carrying value of the inventory and
results of operations.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to adjustments for excess or obsolete
inventory is a critical audit matter are the significant amount of judgement by management in developing the assumptions of the
forecasted product demand, which in turn led to significant auditor judgement, subjectivity, and effort in performing audit
31
procedures and evaluating audit evidence relating to the forecasted product demand. Additionally, for certain new sales
channels there may be limited historical data with which to evaluate forecasts.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall
opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included, among others, testing management’s process for
developing the estimate of the adjustments for excess or obsolete inventory, testing the completeness and accuracy of the
underlying data used in the estimate, and evaluating management’s assumptions of forecasted product demand. Evaluating
management’s demand forecast for reasonableness involved considering historical sales of its products, comparing prior period
estimates to actual results of the same period, and determining whether the demand forecast used was consistent with evidence
obtained in other areas of the audit.
/s/ BPM LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2005.
San Jose, California
July 30, 2024
32
(In thousands, except par value)
2024
2023
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
49,159
$
30,054
$
Short-term investments
-
17,853
Accounts receivable
9,796
16,594
Inventories
37,470
23,908
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
1,423
621
Total current assets
97,848
89,030
Property and equipment, net
3,253
2,759
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net
5,734
6,123
Deferred tax assets, net
20,773
-
Other non-current assets
304
231
Total assets
127,912
$
98,143
$
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
5,332
$
9,206
$
Accrued expenses
3,366
4,143
Operating lease liabilities, short-term
465
137
Deferred revenue, short-term
1,345
2,822
Total current liabilities
10,508
16,308
Operating lease liabilities, long-term
5,732
6,163
Deferred revenue, long-term
41
31
Other long-term liabilities
38
41
Total liabilities
16,319
22,543
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: Authorized: 10,000 shares;
Issued and outstanding: none
-
-
Common stock, $0.01 par value: Authorized: 75,000 shares;
Issued and outstanding: 28,995 shares and 28,539 shares at May 31, 2024 and 2023, respective
289
285
Additional paid-in-capital
130,612
127,776
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(158)
(155)
Accumulated deficit
(19,150)
(52,306)
Total shareholders' equity
111,593
75,600
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
127,912
$
98,143
$
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
May 31,
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
33
(In thousands, except per share data)
2024
2023
2022
Revenue:
Product
61,729
$
60,717
$
47,871
$
Services
4,489
4,244
2,958
Total revenue
66,218
64,961
50,829
Cost of revenue:
Product
31,093
29,759
25,664
Services
2,582
2,456
1,500
Total cost of revenue
33,675
32,215
27,164
Gross profit
32,543
32,746
23,665
Operating expenses:
Research and development
8,719
7,134
5,818
Selling, general and administrative
13,746
12,237
10,047
Total operating expenses
22,465
19,371
15,865
Income from operations
10,078
13,375
7,800
Interest income, net
2,388
1,245
13
Other income (expense), net
(8)
(3)
30
Gain from forgiveness of PPP loan
-
-
1,698
Income before income tax expense (benefit)
12,458
14,617
9,541
Income tax expense (benefit)
(20,698)
60
91
Net income
33,156
$
14,557
$
9,450
$
Net income per share:
Basic
1.15
$
0.52
$
0.36
$
Diluted
1.12
$
0.50
$
0.34
$
Shares used in per share calculations:
Basic
28,818
27,785
26,014
Diluted
29,617
29,215
27,774
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended May 31
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
34
(In thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Net income
33,156
$
14,557
$
9,450
$
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Net change in cumulative translation adjustment
(20)
(33)
(77)
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investments
17
(17)
-
Comprehensive income
33,153
$
14,507
$
9,373
$
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year Ended May 31
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
35
Accumulated
Additional
Other
Total
Paid-in
Comprehensive
Accumulated
Shareholders'
(In thousands)
Shares
Amount
Capital
Loss
Deficit
Equity
Balances, May 31, 2021
23,725
237
$
87,553
$
(28)
$
(76,313)
$
11,449
$
Issuance of common stock under employee plans
1,760
17
3,543
-
-
3,560
Proceeds from public offerings, net of issuance cost
1,697
17
24,013
-
-
24,030
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of
restricted stock units
(62)
-
(429)
-
-
(429)
Stock-based compensation
-
-
3,006
-
-
3,006
Net income
-
-
-
-
9,450
9,450
Foreign currency translation adjustment
-
-
-
(77)
-
(77)
Balances, May 31, 2022
27,120
271
117,686
(105)
(66,863)
50,989
Issuance of common stock under employee plans
1,388
13
2,549
-
-
2,562
Proceeds from public offerings, net of issuance cost
209
2
6,818
-
-
6,820
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of
restricted stock units
(178)
(1)
(2,059)
-
-
(2,060)
Stock-based compensation
-
-
2,782
-
-
2,782
Net income
-
-
-
-
14,557
14,557
Foreign currency translation adjustment
-
-
-
(33)
-
(33)
Net unrealized loss on investments
-
-
-
(17)
-
(17)
Balances, May 31, 2023
28,539
285
127,776
(155)
(52,306)
75,600
Issuance of common stock under employee plans
501
4
1,803
-
-
1,807
Issuance cost of common stock offering
-
-
(72)
-
-
(72)
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of
ricted stock units
(45)
-
(1,596)
-
-
(1,596)
Stock-based compensation
-
-
2,701
-
-
2,701
Net income
-
-
-
-
33,156
33,156
Net unrealized gain on investments
-
-
-
17
-
17
Foreign currency translation adjustment
-
-
-
(20)
-
(20)
Balances, May 31, 2024
28,995
289
$
130,612
$
(158)
$
(19,150)
$
111,593
$
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
36
(In thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
33,156
$
14,557
$
9,450
$
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Stock-based compensation expense
2,518
2,748
3,006
Depreciation and amortization
657
450
356
Deferred income taxes
(20,773)
-
-
Accretion of investment discount
(130)
(576)
-
Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets
706
649
689
Provision for credit losses
-
24
-
Gain from forgiveness of PPP loan
-
-
(1,698)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
6,790
(3,788)
(7,834)
Inventories
(13,732)
(9,469)
(6,674)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
(875)
28
(71)
Accounts payable
(3,891)
5,044
1,356
Accrued expenses
(792)
528
1,464
Deferred revenue
(1,469)
369
2,196
Operating lease liabilities
(423)
(561)
(738)
Income taxes payable
14
8
6
Net cash provided by operating activities
1,756
10,011
1,508
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturities of investments
18,000
16,000
-
Purchases of investments
-
(33,294)
-
Purchases of property and equipment
(749)
(1,362)
(416)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
17,251
(18,656)
(416)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee plans
1,807
2,562
3,560
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on vesting of restricted stock units
(1,596)
(2,060)
(429)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
(72)
6,820
24,030
Line of credit repayments, net
-
-
(1,400)
Net cash provided by financing activities
139
7,322
25,761
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
(41)
(37)
49
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
19,105
(1,360)
26,902
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year (1)
30,204
31,564
4,662
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year (1)
49,309
$
30,204
$
31,564
$
Supplemental cash flow information:
Income taxes paid
90
$
21
$
4
$
Interest paid
-
$
15
$
12
$
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow information:
Net transfer of equipment between inventory and property and equipment
357
$
646
$
472
$
Year Ended May 31
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(1) Includes restricted cash equivalents in other non-current assets.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
37
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
Aehr Test Systems (the “Company”) was incorporated in California in May 1977 and primarily designs, engineers and
manufactures test and burn-in equipment used in the semiconductor industry. The Company’s principal products are the FOX-
XP, FOX-NP, and FOX-CP wafer contact parallel test and burn-in systems, the WaferPak full wafer contactor, the DiePak
Carrier, the WaferPak Aligner, the DiePak Autoloader, and test fixtures.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries.
Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions
Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. Dollars from their functional currencies
using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. Additionally, revenues and expenses are translated using exchange
rates approximating average rates prevailing during the fiscal year. Translation adjustments that arise from translating their
financial statements from their local currencies to U.S. Dollar are accumulated and reflected as a separate component of
shareholders’ equity.
Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate changes denominated in currencies other than the local currency are
included in the consolidated statements of operations as incurred.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates in the
Company’s consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition, inventory valuation and accounting for income
taxes.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of money market instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less. These
investments are reported at fair value.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses
Accounts receivable are derived from the sale of products throughout the world to semiconductor manufacturers,
semiconductor contract assemblers, electronics manufacturers and burn-in and test service companies. Accounts receivable are
recorded at the invoiced amount and are not interest bearing.
The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses for expected uncollectible accounts receivable and assess collectibility
by reviewing accounts receivable on a collective basis where similar risk characteristics exist and on an individual basis when
specific customers with known disputes or collectibility issues are identified. The estimate of expected credit losses considers
historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Changes in
circumstances, such as an unexpected material adverse change in a major customer’s ability to meet its financial obligation to
the Company, may require the Company to further adjust its estimates of the recoverability of accounts receivable. The credit
losses recognized on accounts receivable during the years ended May 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were not significant and
management has determined that no allowance for credit losses was required as of May 31, 2024 and 2023.
38
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash
equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are generally deposited with major financial
institutions in the United States, Philippines, Germany and Taiwan. The Company invests its excess cash in money market
funds and U.S. Treasury securities. The Company’s cash and investment balances held at banks and brokerage firms may at
time exceed federally insured levels. The Company has not experienced any material losses on its money market funds or short-
term cash deposits.
The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally requires no collateral. The Company
had revenues from individual customers in excess of 10% of total revenues as follows:
2024
2023
2022
Customer A
67.3%
78.8%
81.8%
Customer B
16.7%
*
*
Customer C
*
10.4%
*
Year Ended May 31
* Amount was less than 10% of total revenue
The Company had gross accounts receivable from individual customers in excess of 10% of gross accounts receivable as
follows:
2024
2023
Customer A
49.9%
81.6%
Customer B
16.5%
16.5%
Customer C
12.3%
*
May 31,
* Amount was less than 10% of total gross accounts receivable
Inventories
Inventories include material, labor and overhead, and are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined
on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less
costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Provisions for excess, obsolete and unusable inventories are made after
management’s evaluation of future demand and market conditions. If actual future demand or market conditions become less
favorable than those projected by management, additional adjustment for excess or obsolete inventory may be required, and
would be reflected in cost of sales in the period the revision is made.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Major improvements are capitalized,
while repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of their
estimated useful lives or the term of the related lease. Furniture and fixtures, machinery and equipment, and test equipment are
depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The ranges of estimated useful lives are generally as
follows:
Furniture and fixtures
2 to 5 years
Machinery and equipment
3 to 5 years
Test equipment
4 to 5 years
Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying
value of an asset group may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when estimated future cash flows expected
39
to result from the use of the asset, including disposition, are less than the carrying value of the asset. Such an impairment charge
would be measured as the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value.
Warranty Reserves
The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenues are recognized on the products shipped.
While the Company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively monitoring and evaluating
the quality of its component suppliers, the Company’s warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage and
service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Should actual product failure rates, material usage or service
delivery costs differ from the Company’s estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required. The standard
warranty period is one year for systems and ninety days for parts and service.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services by following a five-step
process: (1) identify the contract with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the
transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price, and (5) recognize revenue when or as the Company satisfies a performance
obligation, as further described below.
Performance obligations include sales of systems, WaferPak contactors, spare parts, and services, as well as installation and
training services included in customer contracts. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance
obligation. In determining the transaction price, the Company evaluates whether the price is subject to refund or adjustment to
determine the net consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled. The Company generally does not grant return
privileges, except for defective products during the warranty period.
For contracts that contain multiple performance obligations, the Company allocates the transaction price to the performance
obligations on a relative standalone selling price basis. Standalone selling prices are based on multiple factors including, but not
limited to, historical discounting trends for products and services and pricing practices in different geographies. Revenue for
systems and spares is recognized at a point in time, which is generally upon shipment or delivery and evidenced by transfer of
title and risk of loss to the customer. Revenue from services is recognized over time as the customer receives the benefit over
the contractual period of generally one year or less.
The Company has elected the practical expedient to not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component as the
Company’s standard payment terms are less than one year.
The Company sells its products primarily through a direct sales force. In certain international markets, the Company sells its
products through independent distributors.
Shipping And Handling Costs
Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling of products are included in revenue. Costs incurred related to shipping
and handling of products are included in cost of revenue.
Stock-based Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation expense consists of expenses for stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance RSUs
(“PRSUs”), and an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”). Stock-based compensation cost for stock options and ESPP
purchase rights is measured at each grant date, based on the fair value of the award using the Black-Scholes option valuation
model, and is recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period. For RSUs, PRSUs, restricted shares and
performance restricted shares, stock-based compensation expense is based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock at
the grant date, and is recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period. All of the Company’s stock-based
compensation is accounted for as an equity instrument.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the authoritative guidance, which requires income tax effects for
changes in tax laws to be recognized in the period in which the law is enacted. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
for the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred
tax assets are also recognized for net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation
40
allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effect of a change in tax rates, laws, or status when
the change is enacted.
During the year ended May 31, 2024, the Company concluded that its deferred tax assets are more likely than not to become
realizable, and as such, the Company reversed all $21.9 million of its existing valuation allowance. The conclusion that a
valuation allowance was no longer needed was based on three years of cumulative pre-tax income, current year utilization of
federal and state net operating losses, combined with estimates of future years' pre-tax income that are sufficient to realize the
remaining deferred tax assets. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable can change if estimates of future
taxable income change or if objective negative and positive evidence change. As of May 31, 2023, the Company maintained a
full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.
The Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not such tax position
will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based solely on the technical merits of the respective tax position.
The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such a tax position should be measured based on the
largest benefit having a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority. Interest
and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recognized in the provision for income taxes.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) generally represents all changes in shareholders’ equity except those resulting from investments
or contributions by shareholders. Unrealized gains and losses from available-for-sale securities and on foreign currency
translation adjustments are included in the Company’s components of comprehensive income (loss), which are excluded from
net income. Comprehensive income (loss) is included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the previous year consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period
presentation. The reclassifications had no impact on net income, total assets, total liabilities, or shareholders’ equity.
Accounting Standards Adopted
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2016-13,
Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), that requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for
financial assets held based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the
collectibility of the reported amount. The Company adopted this update beginning in the first quarter of its fiscal year ended
May 31, 2024 on a modified retrospective basis and the adoption had no material impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures: In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting
(Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (ASU 2023-07), which requires disclosure of incremental
segment information on an annual and interim basis. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 on a retrospective basis. The Company is
currently evaluating the effect of this pronouncement on its disclosures.
Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures: In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740):
Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which expands the disclosures required for income taxes. This ASU is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The amendment should be applied on a
prospective basis while retrospective application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this
pronouncement on its disclosures.
2. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENTS
The following table summarizes the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and investments by security type as of May 31, 2024:
41
Gross
Balances as of May 31, 2024
Unrealized
Estimated
(In thousands)
Cost
Gain (Loss)
Fair Value
Cash
5,029
$
-
$
5,029
$
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds
44,130
$
-
$
44,130
$
Total cash and cash equivalents
49,159
$
-
$
49,159
$
Long-term investments:
Money market funds
150
$
-
$
150
$
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments
49,309
$
-
$
49,309
$
The following table summarizes the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and investments by security type as of May 31, 2023:
Gross
Balances as of May 31, 2023
Unrealized
Estimated
(In thousands)
Cost
Loss
Fair Value
Cash
3,182
$
-
$
3,182
$
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds
26,872
$
-
$
26,872
$
Total cash and cash equivalents
30,054
$
-
$
30,054
$
Short-term investments:
U. S. treasury securities
17,870
$
(17)
$
17,853
$
Long-term investments:
Money market funds
150
$
-
$
150
$
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments
48,074
$
(17)
$
48,057
$
Long-term investments are included in other non-current assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Unrealized gains and losses on investments classified as available-for-sale are included within accumulated other
comprehensive loss, net of any related tax effect. Upon realization, those amounts are reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss to results of operations.
3. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company’s financial instruments are measured at fair value consistent with authoritative guidance. This authoritative
guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, and disclosures
required related to fair value measurements.
The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy based on inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value that
is either observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or
liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing
based upon their own market assumptions. The fair value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:
Level 1 - Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 - Inputs that are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant inputs are
observable in the market or can be derived from observable market data. Where applicable, these models project future cash
flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based observable inputs including interest rate curves,
foreign exchange rates, and credit ratings.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activities.
The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2024:
42
Balance as of
(In thousands)
May 31, 2024
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Money market funds
44,280
$
44,280
$
-
$
-
$
Total
44,280
$
44,280
$
-
$
-
$
The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2023:
Balance as of
(In thousands)
May 31, 2023
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Money market funds
27,022
$
27,022
$
-
$
-
$
U. S. treasury securities
17,853
17,853
-
-
Total
44,875
$
44,875
$
-
$
-
$
Included in money market funds as of May 31, 2024 and 2023 was $0.2 million restricted cash, representing a security deposit
for the Company’s United States manufacturing and office space lease which is included in other non-current assets in the
consolidated balance sheets.
There were no financial liabilities measured at fair value as of May 31, 2024 and 2023.
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the fiscal years ended May 31, 2024 and
2023.
The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash equivalents, accounts receivables, accounts payable and certain
other accrued liabilities, approximate fair value due to their short maturities.
4. BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
Inventories consisted of the following:
(In thousands)
2024
2023
Raw materials and sub-assemblies
22,410
$
15,953
$
Work in process
13,593
5,764
Finished goods
1,467
2,191
37,470
$
23,908
$
May 31,
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:
(In thousands)
2024
2023
Leasehold improvements
1,588
$
1,310
$
Machinery and equipment
4,528
5,445
Test equipment
1,928
2,998
Furniture and fixtures
175
706
8,219
10,459
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
(4,966)
(7,700)
3,253
$
2,759
$
May 31,
Depreciation expense was $0.7 million, $0.5 million, and $0.4 million for fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
Accrued expenses consisted of the following:
43
(In thousands)
2024
2023
Commissions and bonuses
$
1,290
$
1,728
Payroll related
1,202
1,491
Professional services
503
520
Other
371
404
$
3,366
4,143
$
May 31,
Changes in the Company’s warranty reserve were as follows:
(In thousands)
2024
2023
Balance at the beginning of the period
267
$
410
$
Accruals for warranties issued during the
period
511
420
Adjustments to previously existing warranty accruals
-
61
Consumption of reserves
(544)
(624)
Balance at the end of the period
234
$
267
$
May 31,
The accrued warranty balance is included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.
Deferred revenue, short-term consisted of the following:
(In thousands)
2024
2023
Customer deposits
1,248
$
2,690
$
Deferred revenue
97
132
1,345
$
2,822
$
May 31,
5. INCOME TAXES
Domestic and foreign components of income before income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
2024
2023
2022
$ 12,355
$ 14,541
$ 9,416
103
76
125
$ 12,458
$ 14,617
$ 9,541
Year Ended May 31,
Domestic
Foreign
(In thousands)
The income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:
44
(In thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Federal income taxes:
Current
$ 6
$ 28
$ 59
Deferred
(14,377)
-
-
State income taxes:
Current
14
-
5
Deferred
(6,396)
-
-
Foreign income taxes:
Current
55
32
27
Deferred
-
-
-
$ (20,698)
$ 60
$ 91
Year Ended May 31,
The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate, as follows:
(In thousands)
2024
2023
2022
U.S. federal statutory tax rate
21.0 %
21.0 %
21.0 %
State taxes, net of federal tax effect
(51.1)
-
0.1
Foreign rate differential
0.2
0.7
0.3
Stock-based compensation
(8.4)
(9.1)
(11.0)
Research and development credit
(1.5)
(2.3)
(1.3)
Change in valuation allowance
(126.0)
(9.3)
(4.7)
PPP Loan
-
-
(3.7)
Other
(0.3)
(0.6)
0.4
Effective tax rate
(166.1) %
0.4 %
1.1 %
Year Ended May 31,
The components of the net deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
(In thousands)
2024
2023
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating losses
$ 9,344
$ 11,964
Lease liability
1,310
1,335
Credit carryforwards
6,739
6,235
Inventory reserves
1,070
938
Reserves and accruals
855
1,200
Capitalized research and development
2,645
1,187
Other
23
297
Less: valuation allowance
-
(21,859)
21,986
1,297
Deferred tax liabilities:
Operating lease right-of-use assets
(1,213)
(1,297)
Net deferred tax assets
$ 20,773
$ -
May 31,
The valuation allowance decreased by $21.9 million during fiscal 2024, $1.1 million during fiscal 2023, and $0.3 million during
fiscal 2022. As of May 31, 2023, the Company maintained a valuation allowance on all the U.S. net deferred tax assets as it was
determined that it was more likely than not that the Company would not recognize the benefits of these assets. The Company
continued to record a valuation allowance through the first nine months of fiscal 2024. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024, the
Company concluded that the valuation allowance related to the U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets was no longer required
due to existence of sufficient positive evidence to support that it is more likely than not that its deferred tax assets are realizable.
At May 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company has federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $34.6 million and
$47.0 million respectively, to reduce future taxable income. A portion of the federal net operating losses will begin to expire in
45
2033. Federal net operating losses of $14.4 million will carryforward indefinitely and would be subject to an 80% taxable
income limitation in the year utilized. At May 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company has state net operating loss carryforwards of
$29.8 million and $30.2 million respectively, to reduce future taxable income. The state net operating loss carryforwards will
begin to expire in 2028.
At May 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company has federal research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $3.3
million and $2.9 million, respectively, to offset future tax liability. The federal credit carryforwards began to expire in 2022. At
May 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company has state research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $7.1 million
and $6.6 million respectively, to offset future tax liability. The state credit carryforwards are not subject to expiration. The
Company also has alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $30 thousand for state purposes. The credits may be used to
offset regular tax and do not expire.
Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code limit the annual use of NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards,
respectively, following an ownership change. NOL carryforwards may be subject to annual limitations under Section 382 (or
comparable provisions of state law) if certain changes in ownership of our company were to occur. In general, an ownership
change occurs for the purposes of Section 382 if there is a more than 50% change in ownership of a company by 5%
shareholders over a 3-year testing period. During the year ended May 31, 2024, we completed a Section 382 study and
determined that there is no limitation on the Company’s ability to utilize its NOLs under Section 382.
The Company has made no provision for U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries because it
is the Company’s intention to permanently reinvest such earnings in its foreign subsidiaries. If such earnings were distributed,
the Company would be subject to additional U.S. income tax expense.
The Company maintains liabilities for uncertain tax positions. These liabilities involve considerable judgment and estimation
and are continuously monitored by management based on the best information available.
The aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits are as follows:
(In thousands)
Balance at May 31, 2021
$ 1,928
Increases related to prior year tax positions
12
Increases related to current year tax positions
78
Balance at May 31, 2022
2,018
Increases related to prior year tax positions
90
Increases related to current year tax positions
168
Balance at May 31, 2023
2,276
Increases related to prior year tax positions
35
Decreases related to prior year tax positions
(28)
Increases related to current year tax positions
233
Decreases related to current year tax positions
(32)
Balance at May 31, 2024
$ 2,484
As of May 31, 2024 and 2023, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $2.5 million and $2.3 million,
respectively. The unrecognized tax benefit of $2.5 million would impact the effective tax rate, if recognized. The Company had
zero accrued interest and accrued penalties related to unrecognized tax benefit as of May 31, 2024. The Company does not
expect its unrecognized tax benefits to change materially over the next 12 months. The Company policy is to recognize interest
and penalties in income tax expense.
The Company’s federal and state income tax returns are subject to possible examination by the taxing authorities until the
expiration of the related statutes of limitations on those tax returns. In general, the federal income tax returns have a three-year
statute of limitations, and the state income tax returns have a four-year statute of limitations. The Company’s foreign income
tax returns are also subject to examination by the foreign tax authorities with the longest statute of limitations period of four-
year. The Company is not currently under audit with the Internal Revenue Service, or any foreign, state or local jurisdictions,
nor has it been notified of any other potential future income tax audit.
46
6. LEASES
The Company leases its manufacturing and office space under operating leases. The principal administrative and production
facility is located in Fremont, California, in a 51,289 square foot building. The Company entered into a non-cancelable
operating lease agreement for its United States manufacturing and office facility, which was amended in December 2022 to
extend the lease term to September 2030. The total commitments, net of tenant incentives of up to $0.3 million expected to be
received by December 2024, under the modified lease are $8.6 million. The modified lease contains an option to further extend
the lease for five years. The lease modification resulted in an increase in the Company’s operating lease right-of-use assets and
operating lease liabilities of $5.9 million each in December 2022. The Company leases a 492 square foot sales and support
office in Utting, Germany. The lease, which began on February 1, 1992 and expires on January 31, 2025, contains an automatic
twelve months renewal. The Company leases a facility in the Philippines located in a 6,458 square foot building in Clark
Freeport Zone, Pampanga. The lease, amended in 2023, began on November 1, 2023 and expires on June 30, 2029 with an
option to renew for another three or five years at the prevailing market rate. Under the lease agreements, the Company is
responsible for payments of utilities, taxes and insurance.
The Company has only operating leases for real estate including corporate offices, warehouse space and certain equipment. A
lease with an initial term of 12 months or less is generally not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets, unless the
arrangement includes an option to purchase the underlying asset, or renew the arrangement that the Company is reasonably
certain to exercise. The Company recognizes lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term for short-term leases that
the Company does not record on its consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s operating leases have remaining lease terms
of one year to six years.
The Company determines whether an arrangement is or contains a lease based on the unique facts and circumstances present at
the inception of the arrangement. Operating lease liabilities and their corresponding right-of-use assets are recorded based on
the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not
readily determinable. As such, the Company utilizes the appropriate incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate incurred to
borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term at an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic
environment. Certain adjustments to the right-of-use asset may be required for items such as initial direct costs paid or
incentives received.
As of May 31, 2024, the weighted average remaining lease term for the Company’s operating leases was 6.2 years and the
weighted average discount rate was 7.58%.
The Company’s operating lease cost was $1.2 million, $0.9 million, and $0.8 million for the years ended May 31, 2024, 2023,
and 2022, respectively.
The following table presents supplemental cash flow information related to the Company’s operating leases:
(In thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Operating cash flows paid for operating leases
916
$
$ 835
$ 813
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for
operating leases liabilities
318
$
5,855
$
-
$
Year Ended May 31,
The following table presents the maturities of the Company’s operating lease liabilities as of May 31, 2024:
(In thousands)
Fiscal year
Operating
Leases
2025
921
$
2026
1,244
2027
1,284
2028
1,316
2029
1,361
Thereafter
1,798
Total future minimum operating lease payments
7,924
Less: imputed interest
(1,727)
Present value of operating lease liabilities
6,197
$
47
7. BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS
Payroll Protection Program Loan
On April 23, 2020, the Company obtained a Payroll Protection Program loan (“PPP Loan”) in the aggregate amount of $1.7
million from Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). The PPP Loan was evidenced by a promissory note dated April 23, 2020 (the
“Note”) that matured on April 23, 2022 and bore interest at a rate of 1% per annum, payable monthly commencing on
November 23, 2020. The PPP Loan proceeds were used for payroll, health care benefits, rent and utilities.
Under the terms of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), PPP Loan recipients can apply for
and be granted forgiveness for all or a portion of loans granted under the PPP Loan. On June 12, 2021, the Company received
confirmation from SVB that on June 4, 2021, the Small Business Administration approved the Company’s PPP Loan
forgiveness application for the entire PPP Loan balance of $1.7 million and interest totaling $20 thousand, and the Company
recognized a gain on loan forgiveness of $1.7 million.
SVB Credit Facility
The Company terminated the revolving line as described below on January 4, 2024.
On January 16, 2020, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Silicon Valley
Bank (“SVB”). Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company may borrow up to (a) the lesser of (i) the revolving line of $4.0
million or (ii) the amount available under the borrowing base under a revolving line of credit which is collateralized by all the
Company’s assets except intellectual property. The borrowing base is 80% of eligible accounts, as determined by SVB from the
Company’s most recent borrowing base statement; provided, however, SVB has the right to decrease the foregoing percentage
in its good faith business judgment to mitigate the impact of certain events or conditions, which may adversely affect the
collateral or its value. Subject to an event of default, the principal amount outstanding under the revolving line of credit will
accrue interest at a floating per annum rate equal to the greater of (a) the prime rate plus an additional percentage of up to 1%,
which additional percentage depends on the Company’s adjusted quick ratio, and (b) 4.75%. Interest is payable monthly on the
last calendar day of each month and the outstanding principal amount, the unpaid interest and all other obligations are due on
the maturity date, which is 364 days from the effective date of January 13, 2020.
On January 14, 2021, the Company entered into the First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement (the “Amendment”)
with SVB. The Amendment, among other things, extended the Revolving Line Maturity Date to July 14, 2021; provided,
however, that if the Company achieved specified operating metrics on a consolidated basis on or prior to May 31, 2021 the
Amended Revolving Line Maturity Date would be extended to January 13, 2022.
On January 11, 2022, the Company entered into the Second Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement (the “Second
Amendment”) with SVB. The Second Amendment, among other things, (A) increased the available amount of the line up to the
lesser of (i) $10 million or (ii) the available amount under the borrowing base, under a revolving line of credit, (B) allowed for
borrowing up to $3 million of the available balance based upon eligible customer purchase orders, (C) reduced the interest rate
for account advances under the line to the greater of (a) prime rate plus an additional percentage up to 1.0%, which additional
percentage depends on the Company’s adjusted quick ratio, and (b) 3.25%, reduces the interest rate for purchase order advances
under the line to the greater of (a) prime rate plus an additional percentage up to 1.5%, which additional percentage depends on
the Company’s adjusted quick ratio, and (b) 3.75%, and (D) extended the maturity date to January 13, 2023.
On January 10, 2023, the Company entered into the Third Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement (the “Third
Amendment”) with SVB. The Third Amendment, among other things, extends the Revolving Line Maturity Date to January 13,
2024, provided, however, that (i) if the Company submits a fiscal year 2024 plan of record that is generally acceptable to SVB,
and (ii) the minimum net liquidity at the end of November 30, 2023 is at least $20.0 million, the Amended Revolving Line
Maturity Date would be extended to January 13, 2025.
8. RETIREMENT PLAN
Employee Savings and Retirement Plan
The Company maintains a defined contribution savings plan (the “401(k) Plan”) to provide retirement income to all qualified
employees of the Company. The 401(k) Plan is intended to be qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended. The 401(k) Plan is funded by voluntary pre-tax contributions from employees. Contributions are invested, as
directed by the participant, in investment funds available under the 401(k) Plan. The Company is not required to make, and did
not make, any contributions to the 401(k) Plan during the fiscal years ended May 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
48
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitment
Purchase obligations consist of non-cancelable significant contractual obligations. As of May 31, 2024, the Company’s
unconditional purchase obligations, which have a remaining term in excess of 12 months, are not material.
Contingencies
The Company may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While there
can be no assurances as to the ultimate outcome of any litigation involving the Company, management does not believe any
pending legal proceedings will result in judgment or settlement that will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In the normal course of business to facilitate sales of its products, the Company indemnifies other parties, including customers,
with respect to certain matters, for example, including against losses arising from a breach of representations or covenants, or
from intellectual property infringement or other claims. These agreements may limit the time within which an indemnification
claim can be made and the amount of the claim. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its
officers and directors, and the Company’s bylaws contain similar indemnification obligations to the Company’s agents.
It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history
of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. To date, payments
made by the Company under these agreements have not had a material impact on the Company’s operating results, financial
position or cash flow.
10. EQUITY
On August 25, 2021, the Board of Directors authorized management to take actions necessary for the execution of a $75 million
shelf registration. A Registration Statement on Form S-3 was filed with the SEC on September 3, 2021. A Prospectus
Supplement for sales of $25 million of common stock pursuant to an "At the Market" ("ATM") offering program was
subsequently filed on September 17, 2021. The Company sold 1,696,729 shares of common stock at an average selling price of
$14.73 per share between September and October 2021. The gross proceeds to the Company were $25 million, before
commission fees of $0.7 million and offering expenses of $0.3 million. Another Prospectus Supplement for an ATM sales of
$25 million of common stock was subsequently filed on February 8, 2023. The Company sold 208,917 shares of common stock
at an average selling price of $34.78 per share in February 2023. The gross proceeds to the Company during the quarter ended
February 28, 2023 were $7.3 million, before commissions of $0.2 million and offering expenses of $0.2 million. The Company
did not sell any shares under the ATM during the year ended May 31, 2024. As of May 31, 2024, the remaining amount of the
ATM offering was $17.7 million.
11. EMPLOYEE STOCK PLANS
2023 Equity Incentive Plan
On October 23, 2023, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2023 Plan") to replace
the Company’s 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”) and reserved a total of 1,500,000 shares of common stock under
the 2023 Plan.
The 2023 Plan permits grants to employees of share-based awards, including stock options, RSUs, PRSUs, restricted shares,
performance restricted shares. Full value awards, which are equity awards other than options, stock appreciation rights or other
awards that are based solely on an increase in value of the shares following the grant date, when granted or forfeited will be
counted as the same number of common stock shares added or deducted to the remaining available shares for issuance under
the 2023 Plan.
2016 Equity Incentive Plan
In October 2016, the Company’s 2016 Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders. The 2016 Plan replaced the 2006
Equity Incentive Plan and would continue in effect until 2026. The exercise price of each stock option equals the market value
of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Options typically vest over four years, subject to the grantee’s continued
service with the Company through the scheduled vesting date, and expire in seven years from the grant date. A total of
49
4,848,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the Company’s 2016 Plan. Full value awards, which
are equity awards other than options, stock appreciation rights or other awards that are based solely on an increase in value of
the shares following the grant date, when granted or forfeited will be counted as two times the number of shares added or
deducted to the remaining available shares for issuance under the 2016 Plan.
The following table summarizes the total stock-based compensation expense for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2024, 2023, and
2022:
(In thousands, except per share data)
2024
2023
2022
Cost of sales
330
$
331
$
234
$
Research and development
639
706
968
Selling, general and administrative
1,549
1,711
1,721
Net effect on net income
2,518
$
2,748
$
2,923
$
Effect on earnings per share:
Basic
0.09
$
0.10
$
0.11
$
Diluted
0.09
$
0.09
$
0.11
$
Year Ended May 31,
As of May 31, 2024 and 2023, stock-based compensation totaling $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, was capitalized
as part of inventory.
The following table presents the combined stock activities and the total number of shares available for grant under the
Company’s equity incentive plans:
(in thousands)
Available
Shares for
Grant
Balance, May 31, 2021
573
Additional shares reserved under the 2016 Plan
1,414
Options granted
(303)
RSUs granted
(1,044)
RSUs cancelled
20
Shares withheld for taxes and not issued
(30)
Options terminated
105
Balance, May 31, 2022
735
Options granted
(110)
RSUs granted
(674)
RSUs cancelled
60
Options terminated
16
Balance, May 31, 2023
27
Shares reserved under the 2023 Plan
1,500
Shares retired under the 2016 Plan
(95)
Options granted
(4)
RSUs granted
(221)
RSUs cancelled
144
Options terminated
12
Balance, May 31, 2024
1,363
Restricted Stock Units, Performance Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards
The Company’s nonvested RSU, PRSU and restricted stock awards granted to employees and members of the Company’s
Board of Directors for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2024 were as follows:
50
Number of
Shares
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Per Share
(In Years)
(in thousands)
Unvested, May 31, 2023
345
6.40
$
2.35
11,392
$
Granted (1)
205
31.36
Vested
(170)
9.31
Forfeited
(86)
13.63
Unvested, May 31, 2024
294
20.08
$
2.29
3,381
$
(1)
Includes 88,000 performance-based awards. The number of shares subject to performance-based conditions represents the aggregate
maximum number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the award over its full term.
During fiscal 2024, the Company recorded stock-based compensation related to RSUs, PRSUs, performance restricted shares
and restricted shares of $1.3 million. As of May 31, 2024, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested
RSU, PRSU and restricted shares was $3.9 million. This expense will be amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted
average period of approximately 2.29 years.
Stock Options
The following table summarized the stock option transactions during fiscal 2024:
Number of
Shares
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Aggregated
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Per Share
(In Years)
(in thousands)
Balances, May 31, 2023
961
3.67
$
4.02
28,211
$
Options granted
4
49.21
Options terminated
(12)
3.78
Options exercised
(251)
2.51
Balances, May 31, 2024
702
4.37
$
3.26
5,322
$
Options exercisable, May 31,
536
3.26
$
2.83
4,512
$
Options exercisable and
expected to vest
701
4.37
$
3.26
5,320
$
The fair value of the Company’s stock options granted to employees was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
model and the straight-line attribution approach with the following weighted average assumptions:
2024
2023
2022
Expected term (in years)
5
5-6
5-6
Volatility
93%
86%
88%
Risk-free interest rates
4.34%
3.12%
1.50%
Weighted average grant date fair value
$
36.02
$
6.29
$
4.01
Year Ended May 31,
The total intrinsic values of options exercised were $9.5 million, $17.1 million, and $12.5 million during fiscal 2024, 2023, and
2022, respectively.
51
During fiscal 2024, the Company recorded stock-based compensation related to its stock options of $0.4 million. As of May
31, 2024, the Company had $0.9 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options granted
and outstanding which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of 3.26 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The ESPP permits employees to purchase common stock at a discount through payroll withholdings at certain specified dates
(purchase period) within a defined offering period. The purchase price is 85.0% of the fair market value of the common stock at
the end of the purchase period and is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
For the fiscal years ended May 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, approximately 72,000, 211,000, and 178,000 shares of common
stock, were issued under the ESPP. As of May 31, 2024, 326,000 shares remain available for issuance under the ESPP.
The fair value of each purchase right under the ESPP was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model with
the following weighted average assumptions:
2024
2023
2022
Expected term (in years)
0.5 – 2.0
0.5 – 2.0
0.5 – 2.0
Volatility
70% – 94%
91% – 203%
101% – 272%
Risk-free interest rates
4.72%–5.53%
3.97%–4.94%
0.05%–2.44%
Weighted average grant date fair value
$ 6.30
$ 13.60
$ 9.68
Year Ended May 31,
During fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022, the Company recorded stock-based compensation related to its ESPP of $0.8 million, $0.8
million, and $0.9 million, respectively.
As of May 31, 2024, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to purchase rights under the ESPP was $1.1 million.
This expense will be amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted average period of approximately 1.2 years.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
The Company has a non-contributory, trusteed employee stock ownership plan or Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)
for full-time and part-time employees. The Company can contribute either shares of the Company’s stock or cash to the ESOP.
During the fiscal years ended May 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the Company contributed 9,085, 29,832 and 26,666 shares to the
ESOP. As a result, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense totaling $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.3
million during the fiscal years ended May 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Shares held in the ESOP are included in the
net income per share calculation.
12. REVENUE
Disaggregation of Revenue
The following tables show revenues by major product categories. Within each product category, contract terms, conditions and
economic factors affecting the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty around revenue recognition and cash flow are
substantially similar.
The Company’s revenues by product category are as follows:
(In thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Systems
24,169
$
38,844
$
25,224
$
Contactors
37,560
21,873
22,647
Services
4,489
4,244
2,958
66,218
$
64,961
$
50,829
$
Year Ended May 31
52
The following presents information about the Company’s operations in different geographic areas. Net revenues are based on
ship-to locations:
(In thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Asia
58,076
$
55,609
$
45,700
$
United States
3,532
9,289
5,110
Europe
4,610
63
19
66,218
$
64,961
$
50,829
$
Year Ended May 31
With the exception of the amount of service contracts and extended warranties, the Company’s product category revenues are
recognized at point in time when control transfers to customers. The following presents revenue based on timing of
recognition:
(In thousands)
2024
2023
2022
Timing of revenue recognition:
Products and services transferred at a point in time
64,590
$
63,531
$
49,441
$
Services transferred over time
1,628
1,430
1,388
66,218
$
64,961
$
50,829
$
Year Ended May 31
Contract Balances
Accounts receivable are recognized in the period the Company delivers goods and provides services or when the Company’s
right to consideration is unconditional. Contract assets include unbilled receivables which represent revenues that are earned in
advance of scheduled billings to customers. These amounts are primarily related to product sales where transfer of control has
occurred but the Company has not yet invoiced. As of May 31, 2024, unbilled receivables were $0.2 million and were included
in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Contract assets were not
significant as of May 31, 2023.
Contract liabilities include payments received in advance of performance under a contract and are satisfied as the associated
revenue is recognized. Contract liabilities as of May 31, 2024 and May 31, 2023 were $1.4 million and $2.9 million,
respectively, and were included in deferred revenue, short-term and deferred revenue, long-term on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. During the fiscal years ended May 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recognized $2.8 million and
$2.2 million, respectively, of revenues that were included in contract liabilities as of May 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Remaining Performance Obligations
As of May 31, 2024, the remaining performance obligations, exclusive of customer deposits, which were comprised of deferred
service contracts and extended warranty contracts not yet delivered, are not material. The foregoing excludes the value of the
remaining performance obligations that have original durations of one year or less, and also excludes information about
variable consideration allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied performance obligation.
Costs to Obtain or Fulfill a Contract
The Company generally expenses sales commissions when incurred as a component of selling, general and administrative
expense as the amortization period is typically less than one year. Additionally, the majority of the Company’s cost of
fulfillment as a manufacturer of products is classified as inventory and fixed assets, which are accounted for under the
respective guidance for those asset types. Other costs of contract fulfillment are immaterial due to the nature of the Company’s
products and their respective manufacturing process.
13. NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic net income per share is determined using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted net income per share is determined using the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares
(representing the hypothetical number of incremental shares issuable under the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options,
and vesting of outstanding RSUs and ESPP shares) during the period using the treasury stock method. The calculation of dilutive
shares outstanding excludes securities that would have an antidilutive effect on net income per share.
53
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:
(In thousands, except per share data)
2024
2023
2022
Numerator:
Net income
33,156
$
14,557
$
9,450
$
Denominator:
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
28,818
27,785
26,014
Dilutive effect of common equivalent shares outstanding
799
1,430
1,760
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
29,617
29,215
27,774
Net income per share - Basic
1.15
$
0.52
$
0.36
$
Net income per share - Diluted
1.12
$
0.50
$
0.34
$
Antidilutive employee share-based awards, excluded
351
5
64
Year Ended May 31
14. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, were as follows:
Cumulative
Unrealized loss
(In thousands)
translation adjustment
on investments, net
Total
Balance as of May 31, 2022
(105)
$
-
$
(105)
$
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
(33)
(17)
(50)
Balance as of May 31, 2023
(138)
(17)
(155)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(20)
17
(3)
Balance as of May 31, 2024
(158)
$
-
$
(158)
$
15. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company has only one reportable segment. The information for revenue category by type, geography and timing of
revenue recognition, is summarized in Note 12, “Revenue.”
Property and equipment information is based on the physical location of the assets. The following table presents property and
equipment information for geographic areas:
(In thousands)
2024
2023
United States
3,128
$
2,713
$
International
125
46
Total long-lived assets, net
3,253
$
2,759
$
May 31,
As of May 31, 2024, the operating lease right-of-use assets of $5.4 million and $0.3 million were allocated in the United States
and international locations, respectively. As of May 31, 2023, operating lease right-of-use assets of $6.0 million and $0.2
million were allocated in the United States and international locations, respectively.
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 15, 2024, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement to acquire all the outstanding shares of Incal
Technology, Inc. (“acquiree”), a California corporation based in Fremont, California and specializing in packaged part
54
reliability/burn-in test solutions. The acquisition aligns with the Company’s strategic objective to expand its market presence
and diversify its product offering. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will acquire all of the outstanding capital
stock of the acquiree for a purchase price of $21.0 million, consisting of $14.0 million in cash and issuance of $7.0 million in
shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain post-closing adjustments with respect to working capital. The
acquisition is expected to close within the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, subject to customary closing conditions.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of
the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are
required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
based upon the framework in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” (2013 Framework) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, management has concluded that the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 31, 2024.
(c) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting.
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual
Report on Form 10-K that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over
financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
Change in Fiscal Year
On July 11, 2024, the Board of Directors approved a change in the Company’s fiscal year-end from May 31 to a 4-4-5 fiscal
calendar ending on the Friday closest to May 31. The change is being made to better align financial reporting with operational
cycles.
The change in fiscal year will not impact the Company’s previously issued consolidated financial statements or tax reporting.
The new fiscal year will begin on June 1, 2024, and end on May 30, 2025, following the 4-4-5 calendar format.
Insider Adoption or Termination of Trading Arrangements
During the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2024, none of our directors or officers informed us of the adoption or termination of a
“Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as those terms are defined in Regulation S-K,
Item 408(a).
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdiction that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable.
55
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
56
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report:
1.
Financial Statements
See Index under Item 8.
2.
Financial Statement Schedule
See Index under Item 8.
3.
Exhibits
See Item 15(b) below.
(b) Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of or incorporated by reference into this Report:
Exhibit No.
Description
3.1(1)
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant.
3.2(2)(28)(29)
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant.
4.1(3)
Form of Common Stock certificate.
4.2(4)
Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and the Investors (as defined therein),
dated as of September 22, 2016.
4.3(26)
Description of Securities
10.1(5)
2006 Equity Incentive Plan.*
10.2(6)
Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.*
10.3(7)
2016 Equity Incentive Plan.*
10.4(8)
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Registrant and its directors and executive
officers.*
10.5(9)
Form of Change of Control Agreement.*
10.6(10)
Lease dated August 3, 1999 for facilities located at Building C, 400 Kato Terrace, Fremont,
California.
10.7(11)
First Amendment dated May 06, 2008 for facilities located at 400 Kato Terrace, Fremont,
California.
10.8(12)
Second Amendment dated November 7, 2014 for facilities located at 400 Kato Terrace, Fremont,
California.
10.9(13)
Third Amendment dated February 27, 2018 for facilities located at 400 Kato Terrace, Fremont,
California.
10.10(14)
Offer Letter dated January 3, 2012, between the Company and Gayn Erickson.*
10.11(15)
Offer Letter dated March 5, 2013, between the Company and Rhea Posedel.*
10.12(16)
Change of Control Severance Agreement dated January 3, 2012, between the Company and Gayn
Erickson.*
10.13(17)
Amended and Restated Change of Control Severance Agreement dated March 5, 2013, between the
Company and Rhea J. Posedel.*
10.15(18)
Form of 2006 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement.*
10.16(19)
Form of 2006 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award.*
10.17(20)
Form of 2016 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement.*
10.18(21)
Form of 2016 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award.*
57
10.19(22)
Purchase Agreement by and among the Company and the Investors (as defined therein), dated as of
September 22, 2016.
10.20(23)
Equity Distribution Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2021, by and between Craig-Hallum
Capital Group LLC and Aehr Test Systems
10.21(24)
Equity Distribution Agreement, dated as of February 7, 2023, by and among William Blair &
Company L.L.C., Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC and Aehr Test Systems
10.22 (25)
Fourth Amendment dated December 5, 2022 for facilities located at 400 Kato Terrace, Fremont,
California.
10.23 (30)
2023 Equity Incentive Plan
21.1(27)
Subsidiaries of the Company.
23.1
Consent of BPM LLP - Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith).
24.1
Power of Attorney (incorporated by reference to the signature page of this Annual Report on Form
10-K).
31.1
Certification Statement of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31.2
Certification Statement of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).
97
Aehr Test Systems Policy for Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation, effective
as of August 14, 2023
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
___________________
(1) Incorporated by reference to the same-numbered exhibit previously filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on
Form S-1 filed June 11, 1997 (File No. 333-28987).
(2) Incorporated by reference to the same-numbered exhibit previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed September 11, 2019 (File No. 000-22893).
(3) Incorporated by reference to the same-numbered exhibit previously filed with Amendment No.1 to the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed July 17, 1997 (File No. 333-28987).
(4) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September
28, 2016 (File No. 000-22893).
(5) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 previously filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed
October 27, 2006 (File No. 333-138249).
(6) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 previously filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed
November 14, 2016 (File No. 333-214589).
(7) Incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed September 26, 2019 (File No.
333-214589).
(8) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 previously filed with Amendment No.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form S-1 filed July 17, 1997 (File No. 333-28987).
(9) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 previously filed with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended May 31,
2001 filed August 29, 2001 (File No. 000-22893).
(10) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 exhibit previously filed with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended May
31, 1999 filed August 30, 1999 (File No. 000-22893).
(11) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 9,
2008 (File No. 000-22893).
(12) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
November 12, 2014 (File No. 000-22893).
(13) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 2,
2018 (File No. 000-22893).
58
(14) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 previously filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
January 9, 2012 (File No. 000-22893).
(15) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 previously filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
March 8, 2013 (File No. 000-22893).
(16) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.3 previously filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
January 9, 2012 (File No. 000-22893).
(17) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 previously filed with the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
March 8, 2013 (File No. 000-22893).
(18) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 previously filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed August
29, 2016 (File No. 000-22893).
(19) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 previously filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed August
29, 2016 (File No. 000-22893).
(20) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 previously filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed August
29, 2017 (File No. 000-22893).
(21) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 previously filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed August
29, 2017 (File No. 000-22893).
(22) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
September 28, 2016 (File No. 000-22893).
(23) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September
17, 2021 (File No. 000-22893).
(24) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 previously filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed August
27, 2021 (File No. 000-22893).
(25) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
December 5, 2022 (File No. 000-22893).
(26) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 previously filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed August
27, 2021 (File No. 000-22893).
(27) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 previously filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed August
27, 2021 (File No. 000-22893).
(28) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September
2, 2020 (File No. 000-22893).
(29) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 previously filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October
19, 2021 (File No. 000-22893).
(30) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company’s S-8 filed October 27, 2023 (File No. 333-275202).
* Management contracts or compensation plans or arrangements in which directors or executive officers are eligible to
participate.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
59
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: July 30, 2024
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS
By: /s/ GAYN ERICKSON
Gayn Erickson
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(Principal Executive Officer)
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and
appoints Gayn Erickson and Chris P. Siu, jointly and severally, his attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for
him in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ RHEA J. POSEDEL
Chairman
July 30, 2024
Rhea J. Posedel
/s/ GAYN ERICKSON
President, Chief Executive
Officer, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
July 30, 2024
Gayn Erickson
/s/ CHRIS P. SIU
Executive Vice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
July 30, 2024
Chris P. Siu
/s/ FARIBA DANESH
Director
July 30, 2024
Fariba Danesh
/s/ LAURA OLIPHANT
Director
July 30, 2024
Laura Oliphant
/s/ GEOFFREY G. SCOTT
Director
July 30, 2024
Geoffrey G. Scott
/s/ HOWARD T. SLAYEN
Director
July 30, 2024
Howard T. Slayen
60
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-259317) and the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-275202, 333-268413, 333-261147, 333-250175, 333-235105, 333-228509, 333-
214589, 333-208130, 333-200442, 333-184865, 333-177954, 333-163100, 333-155389 and 333-138249) of Aehr Test Systems
of our report dated July 30, 2024 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.
/s/ BPM LLP
San Jose, California
July 30, 2024
61
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
I, Gayn Erickson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Aehr Test Systems;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
By: /s/ GAYN ERICKSON
Gayn Erickson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: July 30, 2024
62
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
I, Chris P. Siu, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Aehr Test Systems;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
By: /s/ CHRIS P. SIU
Chris P. Siu
Executive Vice President of Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: July 30, 2024
63
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Gayn Erickson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Aehr Test Systems on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2024 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Aehr
Test Systems.
By: /s/ GAYN ERICKSON
Gayn Erickson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: July 30, 2024
64
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Chris P. Siu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Annual Report of Aehr Test Systems on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2024 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Aehr
Test Systems.
By: /s/ CHRIS P. SIU
Chris P. Siu
Executive Vice President of Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: July 30, 2024
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
DIRECTORS
Rhea J. Posedel
Chairman
Gayn Erickson
President
Chief Executive Officer
Fariba Danesh(2) (3)
Chief Operating Officer
PsiQuantum
Laura Oliphant (1) (2) (3)
Independent consultant and investor
Geoffrey G. Scott (1) (3)
Private Investor
Howard T. Slayen (1) (2)
Retired Partner
PricewaterhouseCoopers
(1) Member of the Audit Committee
(2) Member of the Compensation Committee
(3) Member of the Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee
OFFICERS
Gayn Erickson
President
Chief Executive Officer
Chris P. Siu
Executive V.P. of Finance
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Adil Engineer
Chief Operating Officer
Donald P. Richmond II
Chief Technology Officer
Avi Ray-Chaudhuri
Executive V.P. of Research &
Development
Vernon Rogers
Executive V.P. of Sales and Marketing
Alistar N. Sporck
V.P. of Contactor Business Unit
CORPORATE
HEADQUARTERS
400 Kato Terrace
Fremont, CA 94539
Telephone: 510.623.9400
Fax: 510.623.9450
Website: www.aehr.com
SUBSIDIARIES
Aehr Test Systems
Philippines Inc.
Ground Floor Office Center 08A-E
Berthaphil III Clark Center, Jose Abad
Santos Avenue,
Clark Freeport Zone,
Pampanga, 2023
Philippines
Telephone: 63.454994671
Email: atsphsupport@aehr.com
Aehr Test Systems GmbH
Industriestrasse 9
D-86919 Utting
Germany
Telephone: 49.8806.2021
Fax: 49.8806.2024
Email: atsg@aehr.com
SHAREHOLDER
INFORMATION
Legal Counsel
Latham & Watkins, LLP
Costa Mesa, CA
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
BPM LLP
San Jose, CA
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P. O. Box 43006
Providence, RI 02940-3006
Toll free: 800.962.4284
(US, Canada, Puerto Rico)
781.575.3120 (non-US)
Investor Relations
MKR Group, Inc.
Telephone: 323.468.2300
Email: aehr@mkr-group.com
Annual Meeting
The annual meeting of shareholders
will be held at 4:00 p.m. on
October 21, 2024 at the Company’s
Corporate Headquarters.
CORPORATE INFORMATION
Aehr Test Systems’ corporate
headquarters has been certified to the
International Standards Organization
(ISO) 9001 standard since 1997.
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
400 KATO TERRACE
FREMONT, CA 94539
TELEPHONE: 510.623.9400
FAX: 510.623.9450
WEB: WWW.AEHR.COM