Quarterlytics / Utilities / Regulated Electric / Alabama Power Company

Alabama Power Company

alp-pq · NYSE Utilities
Claim this profile
Ticker alp-pq
Exchange NYSE
Sector Utilities
Industry Regulated Electric
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2017 Annual Report · Alabama Power Company
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

2017 ANNUAL REPORT

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The management of Alabama Power Company (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate 
system of internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and as defined in Exchange 
Act Rule 13a-15(f). A control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control 
system are met.

Under management's supervision, an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial 
reporting was conducted based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee 
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the 
Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

Mark A. Crosswhite
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

Philip C. Raymond
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer

February 20, 2018

1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Alabama Power Company

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets and statements of capitalization of Alabama Power Company (the Company) 
(a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Southern Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related statements of income, 
comprehensive income, common stockholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 
December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial 
statements (pages 31 to 76) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 
2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 
2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on 
the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company 
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in 
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange 
Commission and the PCAOB. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the 
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to 
error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over 
financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting 
but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. 
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due 
to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, 
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting 
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial 
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Birmingham, Alabama
February 20, 2018

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.

2

DEFINITIONS

Term
Meaning
AFUDC ....................................... Allowance for funds used during construction
ARO ............................................ Asset retirement obligation
ASC ............................................. Accounting Standards Codification
ASU............................................. Accounting Standards Update
CCR............................................. Coal combustion residuals
Clean Air Act............................... Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
CO2.............................................. Carbon dioxide
DOE ............................................ U.S. Department of Energy
EPA.............................................. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FASB........................................... Financial Accounting Standards Board
FERC........................................... Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
GAAP.......................................... U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
Georgia Power............................. Georgia Power Company
Gulf Power .................................. Gulf Power Company
IRS .............................................. Internal Revenue Service
ITC .............................................. Investment tax credit
KWH ........................................... Kilowatt-hour
LIBOR......................................... London Interbank Offered Rate
Mississippi Power ....................... Mississippi Power Company
mmBtu......................................... Million British thermal units
Moody's....................................... Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
MW ............................................. Megawatt
NDR ............................................ Natural Disaster Reserve
NOX ............................................. Nitrogen oxide
NRC ............................................ U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OCI.............................................. Other comprehensive income
power pool................................... The operating arrangement whereby the integrated generating resources of the traditional
electric operating companies and Southern Power (excluding subsidiaries) are subject to
joint commitment and dispatch in order to serve their combined load obligations

PPA.............................................. Power purchase agreement
PSC.............................................. Public Service Commission
Rate CNP..................................... Rate Certificated New Plant
Rate CNP Compliance ................ Rate Certificated New Plant Compliance
Rate CNP PPA............................. Rate Certificated New Plant Power Purchase Agreement
Rate ECR..................................... Rate Energy Cost Recovery
Rate NDR .................................... Rate Natural Disaster Reserve
Rate RSE ..................................... Rate Stabilization and Equalization plan
ROE............................................. Return on equity
S&P ............................................. S&P Global Ratings, a division of S&P Global Inc.
SCS.............................................. Southern Company Services, Inc. (the Southern Company system service company)
SEC ............................................. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SEGCO........................................ Southern Electric Generating Company
SO2 .............................................. Sulfur dioxide
Southern Company...................... The Southern Company
Southern Company Gas .............. Southern Company Gas and its subsidiaries

3

DEFINITIONS
(continued)

Term
Southern Company system ......... Southern Company, the traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern

Meaning

Company Gas (as of July 1, 2016), SEGCO, Southern Nuclear, SCS, Southern Linc,
PowerSecure, Inc. (as of May 9, 2016), and other subsidiaries

Southern Linc.............................. Southern Communications Services, Inc.
Southern Nuclear ........................ Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Southern Power........................... Southern Power Company and its subsidiaries
Tax Reform Legislation .............. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017 and became

effective on January 1, 2018

traditional electric operating
companies ................................... Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power

4

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

OVERVIEW

Business Activities

Alabama Power Company (the Company) operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail and 
wholesale customers within its traditional service territory located in the State of Alabama in addition to wholesale customers in 
the Southeast.

Many factors affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company's business of providing electric service. These factors 
include the ability to maintain a constructive regulatory environment, to maintain and grow energy sales and customers, and to 
effectively manage and secure timely recovery of costs. These costs include those related to projected long-term demand growth, 
stringent environmental standards, reliability, fuel, capital expenditures, and restoration following major storms. The Company 
has various regulatory mechanisms that operate to address cost recovery. Effectively operating pursuant to these regulatory 
mechanisms and appropriately balancing required costs and capital expenditures with customer prices will continue to challenge 
the Company for the foreseeable future.

The Company continues to focus on several key performance indicators including, but not limited to, customer satisfaction, plant 
availability, system reliability, and net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock. The Company's financial success 
is directly tied to customer satisfaction. Key elements of ensuring customer satisfaction include outstanding service, high 
reliability, and competitive prices. Management uses customer satisfaction surveys to evaluate the Company's results and 
generally targets the top quartile of these surveys in measuring performance.

See RESULTS OF OPERATIONS herein for information on the Company's financial performance.

Earnings

The Company's 2017 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $848 million, representing a $26 million, 
or 3.2%, increase over the previous year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in rates under Rate RSE effective in 
January 2017 and the impact of a Rate RSE refund recorded in 2016. These increases to income were partially offset by a 
decrease in retail revenues associated with milder weather, lower customer usage, and an increase in non-fuel operations and 
maintenance expenses in 2017 as compared to 2016. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory Matters – 
Rate RSE" herein for additional information.

The Company's 2016 net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was $822 million, representing a $37 million, 
or 4.7%, increase over the previous year. The increase was due primarily to an increase in retail revenues under Rate CNP 
Compliance, an increase in weather-related revenues, and a decrease in operations and maintenance expenses not related to fuel or 
Rate CNP Compliance. These increases to income were partially offset by an accrual for a Rate RSE refund, a decrease in 
AFUDC equity, and an increase in depreciation.

5

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

A condensed income statement for the Company follows:

$

Operating revenues

Fuel

Purchased power

Other operations and maintenance

Depreciation and amortization

Taxes other than income taxes

Total operating expenses
Operating income
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
Other income (expense), net

Income taxes

Net income

Dividends on preferred and preference stock

Net income after dividends on preferred and preference stock

$

Operating Revenues

Amount

2017

Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year

2017
(in millions)

2016

6,039

1,225

328

1,652

736

384

4,325
1,714
39
305
(14)
568

866

18

848

$

$

150
(72)
(6)
142

33

4

101
49
11
3

7

37

27

1

26

$

$

121
(45)
(17)
9

60

12

19
102
(32)
28
11

25

28
(9)
37

Operating revenues for 2017 were $6.0 billion, reflecting a $150 million increase from 2016. Details of operating revenues 
were as follows:

Retail — prior year

Estimated change resulting from —

Rates and pricing
Sales decline

Weather

Fuel and other cost recovery

Retail — current year

Wholesale revenues —

Non-affiliates

Affiliates

Total wholesale revenues

Other operating revenues
Total operating revenues

Percent change

Amount

2017

2016

(in millions)

$

5,322

$

5,234

362
(44)

(89)

(93)

5,458

276

97

373

208

$

6,039

$

147
(20)
31
(70)
5,322

283

69

352

215
5,889

2.6%

2.1%

Retail revenues in 2017 were $5.5 billion. These revenues increased $136 million, or 2.6%, in 2017 and $88 million, or 1.7%, 
in 2016, each as compared to the prior year. The increase in 2017 was primarily due to an increase in rates under Rate RSE 
effective in January 2017, partially offset by a decrease in fuel revenues and milder weather in the first and third quarters 2017 

6

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016. The increase in 2016 was due to an increase in revenues under Rate CNP 
Compliance as a result of increased net investments, partially offset by a decrease in fuel revenues and an accrual for a Rate 
RSE refund. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" for additional information. 
See "Energy Sales" herein for a discussion of changes in the volume of energy sold, including changes related to sales decline 
and weather. 

Fuel rates billed to customers are designed to fully recover fluctuating fuel and purchased power costs over a period of time. 
Fuel revenues generally have no effect on net income because they represent the recording of revenues to offset fuel and 
purchased power expenses. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate ECR" for additional 
information.

Wholesale revenues from power sales to non-affiliated utilities were as follows:

Capacity and other
Energy
Total non-affiliated

2017

$

$

154
122
276

2016
(in millions)
154
$
129
283

$

2015

$

$

140
101
241

Wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates will vary depending on fuel prices, the market prices of wholesale energy 
compared to the cost of the Company's and the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern 
Company system's electric service territory, and availability of the Southern Company system's generation. Increases and 
decreases in energy revenues that are driven by fuel prices are accompanied by an increase or decrease in fuel costs and do not 
affect net income. Short-term opportunity energy sales are also included in wholesale energy sales to non-affiliates. These 
opportunity sales are made at market-based rates that generally provide a margin above the Company's variable cost to produce 
the energy.

In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates decreased $7 million, or 2.5%, as compared to the prior year. In 2016, 
wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates increased $42 million, or 17.4%, as compared to the prior year primarily due to 
a $28 million increase in revenues from energy sales and a $14 million increase in capacity revenues. In 2016, KWH sales 
increased 33.3% primarily due to a new contract that became effective in the first quarter 2016 partially offset by a 12.1% 
decrease in the price of energy due to lower natural gas prices.

Wholesale revenues from sales to affiliated companies will vary depending on demand and the availability and cost of 
generating resources at each company. These affiliate sales and purchases are made in accordance with the Intercompany 
Interchange Contract (IIC), as approved by the FERC. These transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings since this 
energy is generally sold at marginal cost and energy purchases are generally offset by energy revenues through the Company's 
energy cost recovery clause.

In 2017, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates increased $28 million, or 40.6%, as compared to the prior year. In 2017, 
KWH sales increased 31.1% as a result of supporting Southern Company system transmission reliability and a 6.9% increase in 
the price of energy primarily due to higher natural gas prices. In 2016, wholesale revenues from sales to affiliates decreased $15 
million, or 17.9%, as compared to the prior year. In 2016, KWH sales decreased 15.7% as a result of lower-cost generation 
available in the Southern Company system and a 2.6% decrease in the price of energy primarily due to lower natural gas prices.

7

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Energy Sales

Changes in revenues are influenced heavily by the change in the volume of energy sold from year to year. KWH sales for 2017 
and the percent change from the prior year were as follows:

Residential

Commercial

Industrial

Other

Total retail

Wholesale

Non-affiliates
Affiliates

Total wholesale

Total energy sales

Total
KWHs

2017
(in billions)

17.2

13.6

22.7

0.2

53.7

5.5
4.2

9.7

63.4

Total KWH
Percent Change

2017

2016

Weather-Adjusted
Percent Change

2017

2016

(1.2)%
(1.3)
1.7
(5.0)
(0.1)%

(0.5)%

(0.5)

(4.6)

3.8

(2.2)%

(6.1)%
(3.4)
1.7
(5.0)
(2.3)

(6.5)
31.1

6.6
(1.0)%

1.4%
(0.1)
(4.6)
3.8
(1.5)

37.1
(15.7)
12.5

0.3%

Changes in retail energy sales are generally the result of changes in electricity usage by customers, changes in weather, and 
changes in the number of customers. Retail energy sales in 2017 were 2.3% lower than in 2016. Residential sales and 
commercial sales decreased 6.1% and 3.4% in 2017, respectively, primarily due to milder weather in the first and third quarters 
2017 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016. Weather-adjusted residential sales were 1.2% lower in 2017 primarily 
due to lower customer usage resulting from an increase in penetration of energy-efficient residential appliances, partially offset 
by customer growth. Weather-adjusted commercial sales were 1.3% lower in 2017 primarily due to lower customer usage 
resulting from customer initiatives in energy savings and an ongoing migration to the electronic commerce business model, 
partially offset by customer growth. Industrial sales increased 1.7% in 2017 as compared to 2016 as a result of an increase in 
demand resulting from changes in production levels primarily in the primary metals, chemicals, and mining sectors offset by 
the pipelines and paper sectors.

Retail energy sales in 2016 were 1.5% lower than in 2015. Residential sales increased 1.4% primarily due to warmer weather in 
the third quarter 2016 as compared to the corresponding period in 2015. Commercial sales remained flat in 2016. Weather-
adjusted residential sales were flat in 2016 due to lower customer usage primarily resulting from an increase in efficiency 
improvements in residential appliances and lighting, partially offset by customer growth. Industrial sales decreased 4.6% in 
2016 compared to 2015 as a result of a decrease in demand resulting from changes in production levels primarily in the primary 
metals, chemical, pipelines, paper, and stone, clay, and glass sectors. A strong dollar, low oil prices, and weak global growth 
conditions constrained growth in the industrial sector in 2016.

See "Operating Revenues" above for a discussion of significant changes in wholesale revenues from sales to non-affiliates and 
wholesale revenues from sales to affiliated companies as related to changes in price and KWH sales.

Fuel and Purchased Power Expenses

Fuel costs constitute one of the largest expenses for the Company. The mix of fuel sources for generation of electricity is 
determined primarily by the unit cost of fuel consumed, demand, and the availability of generating units. Additionally, the 
Company purchases a portion of its electricity needs from the wholesale market.

8

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Details of the Company's generation and purchased power were as follows:

Total generation (in billions of KWHs)

Total purchased power (in billions of KWHs)
Sources of generation (percent) —

Coal

Nuclear

Gas

Hydro

Cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH) —

Coal

Nuclear

Gas

Average cost of fuel, generated (in cents per net KWH)(a)
Average cost of purchased power (in cents per net KWH)(b)

2017

2016

2015

60.3

6.4

50

24

20

6

2.60

0.75

2.72

2.14
5.29

60.2

7.1

53

23

19

5

2.75

0.78

2.67

2.26
4.80

60.9

6.3

54

24

16

6

2.83

0.81

2.94

2.34
5.66

(a) KWHs generated by hydro are excluded from the average cost of fuel, generated.

(b) Average cost of purchased power includes fuel, energy, and transmission purchased by the Company for tolling agreements where power is generated by

the provider.

Fuel and purchased power expenses were $1.55 billion in 2017, a decrease of $78 million, or 4.8%, compared to 2016. The 
decrease was primarily due to a $67 million net decrease related to the volume of KWHs generated and purchased and a $42 
million decrease in the average cost of fuel, partially offset by a $31 million increase in the average cost of purchased power. 

Fuel and purchased power expenses were $1.63 billion in 2016, a decrease of $62 million, or 3.7%, compared to 2015. The 
decrease was primarily due to a $61 million decrease in the average cost of purchased power, and a $59 million decrease in the 
average cost of fuel, partially offset by a $49 million increase related to the volume of KWHs purchased.

Fuel and purchased power energy transactions do not have a significant impact on earnings, since energy expenses are generally 
offset by energy revenues through the Company's energy cost recovery clause. The Company, along with the Alabama PSC, 
continuously monitors the under/over recovered balance to determine whether adjustments to billing rates are required. See 
Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate ECR" for additional information.

Energy purchases from non-affiliates will vary depending on the market prices of wholesale energy as compared to the cost of 
the Southern Company system's generation, demand for energy within the Southern Company system's electric service territory, 
and the availability of the Southern Company system's generation.

Fuel

Fuel expenses were $1.2 billion in 2017, a decrease of $72 million, or 5.6%, compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily due 
to a 12.2% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by hydro, a 5.8% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated by coal, 
and a 5.5% and 3.9% decrease in the average cost of KWHs generated by coal and nuclear fuel, respectively. These decreases 
were partially offset by an 8.1% increase in the volume of KWHs generated by nuclear fuel and a 4.0% increase in the volume 
of KWHs generated by natural gas. Fuel expenses were $1.3 billion in 2016, a decrease of $45 million, or 3.4%, compared to 
2015. The decrease was primarily due to a 9.2% decrease in the average cost of KWHs generated by natural gas, which 
excludes tolling agreements, a 4.2% and 3.9% decrease in the volume of KWHs generated by nuclear fuel and coal, 
respectively, and a 3.7% decrease in the average cost of KWHs generated by nuclear fuel, partially offset by a 17.4% increase 
in the volume of KWHs generated by natural gas.

Purchased Power – Affiliates

Purchased power expense from affiliates was $158 million in 2017, a decrease of $10 million, or 6.0%, compared to 2016. This 
decrease was primarily due to a 17.2% decrease in the amount of energy purchased due to milder weather partially offset by a 
13.9% increase in the average cost per KWH purchased due to higher natural gas prices. Purchased power expense from 
affiliates was $168 million in 2016, a decrease of $12 million, or 6.7%, compared to 2015. This decrease was primarily due to a 

9

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

20.7% decrease in the average cost per KWH purchased due to lower natural gas prices, partially offset by a 17.5% increase in 
the amount of energy purchased due to the availability of lower-cost generation compared to the Company's owned generation.

Energy purchases from affiliates will vary depending on demand for energy and the availability and cost of generating 
resources at each company within the Southern Company system. These purchases are made in accordance with the IIC or other 
contractual agreements, as approved by the FERC.

Other Operations and Maintenance Expenses

In 2017, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $142 million, or 9.4%, as compared to the prior year. 
Distribution and transmission expenses increased $58 million primarily due to vegetation management expenses. Generation 
costs increased $38 million primarily due to outage costs. Employee benefit costs, including pension costs, increased $22 
million. 

In 2016, other operations and maintenance expenses increased $9 million, or 0.6%, as compared to the prior year. Steam 
production costs increased $28 million primarily due to the timing of generation operating expenses. Transmission and 
distribution expenses increased $10 million and $7 million, respectively, primarily due to additional vegetation management 
and other maintenance expenses. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $32 million in employee benefit costs, 
including pension costs. The increases in operations and maintenance expenses were primarily Rate CNP compliance-related 
costs and therefore had no significant impact to net income. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Retail Regulatory 
Matters – Rate CNP Compliance" herein for additional information.

See Note 2 to the financial statements under "Pension Plans" for additional information.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization increased $33 million, or 4.7%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to additional 
plant in service and an increase in generation-related depreciation rates, effective January 1, 2017, associated with compliance-
related steam projects and ARO recovery, partially offset by a decrease in distribution-related depreciation rates. See Note 1 to 
the financial statements under "Depreciation and Amortization" for additional information. Depreciation and amortization 
increased $60 million, or 9.3%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year primarily due to compliance-related steam projects placed 
in service.

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes

Taxes other than income taxes increased $4 million, or 1.1%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. In 2016, taxes other than 
income taxes increased $12 million, or 3.3% in 2016 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to increases 
in state and municipal utility license tax bases primarily due to an increase in retail revenues. In addition, ad valorem taxes 
increased primarily due to an increase in assessed value of property.

Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction

AFUDC equity increased $11 million, or 39.3%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily associated 
with steam, transmission, and nuclear construction projects. AFUDC equity decreased $32 million, or 53.3%, in 2016 as 
compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily associated with steam generation capital projects being placed in 
service. See Note 1 to financial statements under "Allowance for Funds Used During Construction" for additional information.

Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $3 million, or 1.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. Interest 
expense, net of amounts capitalized increased $28 million, or 10.2%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year primarily due to an 
increase in debt outstanding and a reduction in the amounts capitalized. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Financing 
Activities" herein for additional information.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Other income (expense), net increased $7 million, or 33.3%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to increases in 
unregulated lighting services. Other income (expense), net increased $11 million, or 34.4%, in 2016 as compared to the prior 
year primarily due to a decrease in donations, partially offset by a decrease in sales of non-utility property.

10

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Income Taxes 

Income taxes increased $37 million, or 7.0%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings, an 
increase in prior year tax return actualization, and an increase in income tax reserves, partially offset by an increase in state 
income tax credits. The impact to income taxes as a result of Tax Reform Legislation was not material due to the application of 
regulatory accounting. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" 
herein and Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information. Income taxes increased $25 million, or 4.9%, in 2016 
as compared to the prior year primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings.

Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock

Dividends on preferred and preference stock increased $1 million, or 5.9%, in 2017 as compared to the prior year. Dividends on 
preferred and preference stock decreased $9 million, or 34.6%, in 2016 as compared to the prior year. The decrease was 
primarily due to the redemption in May 2015 of certain series of preferred and preference stock. See Note 6 to the financial 
statements under "Redeemable Preferred and Preference Stock" for additional information.

Effects of Inflation

The Company is subject to rate regulation that is generally based on the recovery of historical and projected costs. The effects 
of inflation can create an economic loss since the recovery of costs could be in dollars that have less purchasing power. Any 
adverse effect of inflation on the Company's results of operations has not been substantial in recent years. See Note 3 to the 
financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" for additional information.

FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL

General

The Company operates as a vertically integrated utility providing electric service to retail and wholesale customers within its 
traditional service territory located in the State of Alabama and to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Prices for electric service 
provided by the Company to retail customers are set by the Alabama PSC under cost-based regulatory principles. Prices for 
wholesale electric service, interconnecting transmission lines, and the exchange of electric power are regulated by the FERC. 
Retail rates and earnings are reviewed and may be adjusted periodically within certain limitations. See ACCOUNTING 
POLICIES – "Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Utility Regulation" herein and Note 3 to the financial 
statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information about regulatory matters.

The results of operations for the past three years are not necessarily indicative of future earnings potential. The level of the 
Company's future earnings depends on numerous factors that affect the opportunities, challenges, and risks of the Company's 
primary business of providing electric service. These factors include the Company's ability to maintain a constructive regulatory 
environment that continues to allow for the timely recovery of prudently-incurred costs during a time of increasing costs and 
limited projected demand growth over the next several years. Future earnings will be impacted by customer growth. Earnings will 
also depend upon maintaining and growing sales, considering, among other things, the adoption and/or penetration rates of 
increasingly energy-efficient technologies and increasing volumes of electronic commerce transactions, both of which could 
contribute to a net reduction in customer usage. Earnings are subject to a variety of other factors. These factors include weather, 
competition, new energy contracts with other utilities, energy conservation practiced by customers, the use of alternative energy 
sources by customers, the price of electricity, the price elasticity of demand, and the rate of economic growth or decline in the 
Company's service territory. Demand for electricity is primarily driven by the pace of economic growth that may be affected by 
changes in regional and global economic conditions, which may impact future earnings.

On December 22, 2017, Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018, which, among 
other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% and changes rates of depreciation and the business interest 
deduction. See "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax Reform Legislation" and FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – 
"Credit Rating Risk" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" and 
"Current and Deferred Income Taxes," respectively, for additional information.

Environmental Matters

The Company's operations are regulated by state and federal environmental agencies through a variety of laws and regulations 
governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources. The Company maintains a comprehensive environmental 
compliance strategy to assess upcoming requirements and compliance costs associated with these environmental laws and 
regulations. The costs, including capital expenditures and operations and maintenance costs, required to comply with 
environmental laws and regulations may impact future unit retirement and replacement decisions, results of operations, cash 

11

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

flows, and financial condition. Compliance costs may result from the installation of additional environmental controls, closure 
and monitoring of CCR facilities, unit retirements, and adding or changing fuel sources for certain existing units, as well as 
related upgrades to the transmission system. A major portion of these compliance costs are expected to be recovered through 
existing ratemaking provisions. The ultimate impact of the environmental laws and regulations discussed below will depend on 
various factors, such as state adoption and implementation of requirements, the availability and cost of any deployed control 
technology, and the outcome of pending and/or future legal challenges.

New or revised environmental laws and regulations could affect many areas of the Company's operations. The impact of any such 
changes cannot be determined at this time. Environmental compliance costs could affect earnings if such costs cannot continue to 
be fully recovered in rates on a timely basis. Environmental compliance costs are recovered through Rate CNP Compliance. See 
Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate CNP Compliance" for additional information. Further, 
increased costs that are recovered through regulated rates could contribute to reduced demand for electricity, which could 
negatively affect results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Additionally, many commercial and industrial 
customers may also be affected by existing and future environmental requirements, which for some may have the potential to 
ultimately affect their demand for electricity.

Through 2017, the Company has invested approximately $4.7 billion in environmental capital retrofit projects to comply with 
environmental requirements, with annual totals of approximately $491 million, $260 million, and $349 million for 2017, 2016, 
and 2015, respectively. Although the timing, requirements, and estimated costs could change as environmental laws and 
regulations are adopted or modified, as compliance plans are revised or updated, and as legal challenges to rules are initiated or 
completed, the Company's current compliance strategy estimates capital expenditures of $1.4 billion from 2018 through 2022, 
with annual totals of approximately $581 million in 2018, $110 million in 2019, $163 million in 2020, $258 million in 2021, and 
$268 million in 2022. These estimates do not include any potential compliance costs associated with the regulation of CO2 
emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. See "Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information. The 
Company also anticipates expenditures associated with ash pond closure and ground water monitoring under the Disposal of Coal 
Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities rule (CCR Rule), which are reflected in the Company's ARO liabilities. See 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 1 to the 
financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

Air Quality

The EPA has set National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen 
dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and SO2), which it reviews and revises periodically. Revisions to these standards can require 
additional emission controls, improvements in control efficiency, or fuel changes which can result in increased compliance and 
operational costs. NAAQS requirements can also adversely affect the siting of new facilities. In 2015, the EPA published a more 
stringent eight-hour ozone NAAQS. The EPA plans to complete designations for this rule by no later than April 30, 2018. No 
areas within the Company's service territory have been or are anticipated to be designated nonattainment under the 2015 ozone 
NAAQS. In 2010, the EPA revised the NAAQS for SO2, establishing a new one-hour standard, and is completing designations in 
multiple phases. The EPA has issued several rounds of area designations and no areas in the vicinity of Company-owned SO2 
sources have been designated nonattainment under the 2010 one-hour SO2 NAAQS. However, final eight-hour ozone and SO2 
one-hour designations for certain areas are still pending and, if other areas are designated as nonattainment in the future, increased 
compliance costs could result.

In 2011, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and its NOX annual, NOX seasonal, and SO2 annual 
programs. CSAPR is an emissions trading program that addresses the impacts of the interstate transport of SO2 and NOX 
emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants located in upwind states in the eastern half of the U.S. on air quality in downwind 
states. The Company has fossil fuel-fired generation subject to these requirements. In October 2016, the EPA published a final 
rule that revised the CSAPR seasonal NOX program, establishing more stringent NOX emissions budgets in Alabama. Increases in 
either future fossil fuel-fired generation or the cost of CSAPR allowances could have a negative financial impact on results of 
operations for the Company.

The EPA finalized regional haze regulations in 2005 and 2017. These regulations require states, tribal governments, and various 
federal agencies to develop and implement plans to reduce pollutants that impair visibility and demonstrate reasonable progress 
toward the goal of restoring natural visibility conditions in certain areas, including national parks and wilderness areas. States 
must submit a revised state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA by July 31, 2021, demonstrating reasonable progress towards 
achieving visibility improvement goals. State implementation of reasonable progress could require further reductions in SO2 or 
NOX emissions, which could result in increased compliance costs.

12

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

In 2015, the EPA published a final rule requiring certain states (including Alabama) to revise or remove the provisions of their 
SIPs regulating excess emissions at industrial facilities, including electric generating facilities, during periods of startup, shut-
down, or malfunction (SSM). The state excess emission rules provide necessary operational flexibility to affected units during 
periods of SSM and, if removed, could affect unit availability and result in increased operations and maintenance costs for the 
Company.

Water Quality

In 2014, the EPA finalized requirements under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate cooling water intake 
structures at existing power plants and manufacturing facilities in order to minimize their effects on fish and other aquatic life. 
The regulation requires plant-specific studies to determine applicable measures to protect organisms that either get caught on the 
intake screens (impingement) or are drawn into the cooling system (entrainment). The ultimate impact of this rule will depend on 
the outcome of these plant-specific studies and any additional protective measures required to be incorporated into each plant's 
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit based on site-specific factors.

In 2015, the EPA finalized the steam electric effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) rule that set national standards for wastewater 
discharges from steam electric generating units. The rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain wastestreams and imposes 
stringent arsenic, mercury, selenium, and nitrate/nitrite limits on scrubber wastewater discharges. The revised technology-based 
limits and compliance dates may require extensive modifications to existing ash and wastewater management systems or the 
installation and operation of new ash and wastewater management systems. Compliance with the ELG rule is expected to require 
capital expenditures and increased operational costs primarily affecting the Company's coal-fired electric generation. Compliance 
applicability dates range from November 1, 2018 to December 31, 2023 with state environmental agencies incorporating specific 
applicability dates in the NPDES permitting process based on information provided for each waste stream. The EPA has 
committed to a new rulemaking that could potentially revise the limitations and applicability dates of the ELG rule. The EPA 
expects to finalize this rulemaking in 2020. The Company continues to monitor the ELG rule and anticipates that approximately 
1,000 MWs of the Company's generation will not be available after the compliance date. The ultimate impact of this rule will 
depend on any new rule-making that revises the limitation and applicable dates. The Company does not anticipate that the 
unavailability of any units as a result of the ELG rule will have a material impact on the Company's operations or financial 
condition.

In 2015, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jointly published a final rule that revised the regulatory 
definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) for all CWA programs. The rule significantly expanded the scope of federal 
jurisdiction over waterbodies (such as rivers, streams, and canals), which could impact new generation projects and permitting 
and reporting requirements associated with the installation, expansion, and maintenance of transmission and distribution projects. 
On July 27, 2017, the EPA and the Corps proposed to rescind the 2015 WOTUS rule. The WOTUS rule has been stayed by the 
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit since late 2015, but on January 22, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that 
federal district courts have jurisdiction over the pending challenges to the rule. On February 6, 2018, the EPA and the Corps 
published a final rule delaying implementation of the 2015 WOTUS rule to 2020.

Coal Combustion Residuals

In 2015, the EPA finalized non-hazardous solid waste regulations for the disposal of CCR, including coal ash and gypsum, in 
landfills and surface impoundments (CCR units) at active generating power plants. The CCR Rule requires CCR units to be 
evaluated against a set of performance criteria and potentially closed if minimum criteria are not met. Closure of existing CCR 
units could require installation of equipment and infrastructure to manage CCR in accordance with the rule. The EPA has 
announced plans to reconsider certain portions of the CCR Rule by no later than December 2019, which could result in changes to 
deadlines and corrective action requirements.

The EPA's reconsideration of the CCR Rule is due in part to a legislative development that impacts the potential oversight role of 
state agencies. Under the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, which became law in 2016, states are allowed to 
establish permit programs for implementing the CCR Rule.

Based on cost estimates for closure in place and monitoring of ash ponds pursuant to the CCR Rule, the Company recorded AROs 
for each CCR unit in 2015. As further analysis is performed and closure details are developed, the Company will continue to 
periodically update these cost estimates as necessary. See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Capital Requirements 
and Contractual Obligations" herein and Note 1 to the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs 
of Removal" for additional information regarding the Company's AROs as of December 31, 2017.

13

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Global Climate Issues

In 2015, the EPA published final rules limiting CO2 emissions from new, modified, and reconstructed fossil fuel-fired electric 
generating units and guidelines for states to develop plans to meet EPA-mandated CO2 emission performance standards for 
existing units (known as the Clean Power Plan or CPP). In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay of the CPP, 
which will remain in effect through the resolution of litigation in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia 
challenging the legality of the CPP and any review by the U.S. Supreme Court. On March 28, 2017, the U.S. President signed an 
executive order directing agencies to review actions that potentially burden the development or use of domestically produced 
energy resources, including review of the CPP and other CO2 emissions rules. On October 10, 2017, the EPA published a 
proposed rule to repeal the CPP and, on December 28, 2017, published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking regarding a 
CPP replacement rule.

In 2015, parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, including the United States, adopted the Paris 
Agreement, which established a non-binding universal framework for addressing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions based on 
nationally determined contributions. On June 1, 2017, the U.S. President announced that the United States would withdraw from 
the Paris Agreement and begin renegotiating its terms. The ultimate impact of this agreement or any renegotiated agreement 
depends on its implementation by participating countries.

The EPA's GHG reporting rule requires annual reporting of GHG emissions expressed in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent 
emissions for a company's operational control of facilities. Based on ownership or financial control of facilities, the Company's 
2016 GHG emissions were approximately 38 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. The preliminary estimate of the Company's 
2017 GHG emissions on the same basis is approximately 37 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.

FERC Matters

The Company has authority from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain 
balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC 
found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing 
such authority, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a triennial market 
power analysis in 2014, which included continued reliance on the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued 
an order finding that the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's existing 
tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional 
electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies 
(including the Company) and Southern Power to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to 
provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies (including the 
Company) and Southern Power filed a request for rehearing and filed their response with the FERC in 2015.

In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed an amendment 
to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff changes. On 
February 2, 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to an additional condition of cost-based price caps 
for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate alternative mitigation for 
the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's potential to exert market power in 
certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and in some adjacent areas. On May 
17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's 
compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order references the market power 
proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.

On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' (including the 
Company's) and Southern Power's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional 
electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate 
authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 
2017 order or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional 
electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve 
matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of 
the October 25, 2017 order.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

14

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Retail Regulatory Matters

The Company's revenues from regulated retail operations are collected through various rate mechanisms subject to the oversight 
of the Alabama PSC. The Company currently recovers its costs from the regulated retail business primarily through Rate RSE, 
Rate CNP, Rate ECR, and Rate NDR. In addition, the Alabama PSC issues accounting orders to address current events impacting 
the Company. See Note 1 to the financial statements and Note 3 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for 
additional information regarding the Company's rate mechanisms and accounting orders.

Rate RSE

The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon the Company's projected 
weighted cost of equity (WCE) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information 
for the applicable upcoming calendar year. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged together, cannot exceed 
4.0% and any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. If the Company's actual retail return is above the allowed WCE range, the 
excess will be refunded to customers unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is no provision for additional 
customer billings should the actual retail return fall below the WCE range.

At December 31, 2016, the Company's retail return exceeded the allowed WCE range which resulted in the Company establishing 
a $73 million Rate RSE refund liability. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 14, 2017, the Company 
applied the full amount of the refund to reduce the under recovered balance of Rate CNP PPA as discussed further below.

Effective in January 2017, Rate RSE increased 4.48%, or $245 million annually. At December 31, 2017, the Company's actual 
retail return was within the allowed WCE range. On December 1, 2017, the Company made its required annual Rate RSE 
submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar year 2018. Projected earnings were within the specified range; 
therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remained unchanged for 2018.

In conjunction with Rate RSE, the Company has an established retail tariff that provides for an adjustment to customer billings to 
recognize the impact of a change in the statutory income tax rate. As a result of Tax Reform Legislation, the application of this 
tariff would reduce annual retail revenue by approximately $250 million over the remainder of 2018. The ultimate outcome of this 
matter cannot be determined at this time.

Rate CNP PPA

The Company's retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of 
new generating facilities into retail service. The Company may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under 
Rate CNP PPA. On March 7, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that the Company leave in effect the current Rate 
CNP PPA factor for billings for the period April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. No adjustment to Rate CNP PPA is expected in 
2018.

In accordance with an accounting order issued on February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, the Company eliminated the under 
recovered balance in Rate CNP PPA at December 31, 2016, which totaled approximately $142 million. As discussed herein under 
"Rate RSE," the Company utilized the full amount of its $73 million Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the amount of the Rate 
CNP PPA under recovery and reclassified the remaining $69 million to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new 
regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of the Company's next depreciation study, 
which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. The Company's current depreciation study became effective January 
1, 2017.

Rate CNP Compliance

Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of the Company's retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such 
mandates directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar 
considerations impacting the Company's facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information 
and provides for the recovery of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered 
include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP 
Compliance, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in 
current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will have no significant effect on the Company's revenues or net 
income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and 
depreciation generally will have no effect on net income.

In accordance with an accounting order issued on February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, the Company reclassified $36 million 
of its under recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory 

15

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of the Company's next depreciation study, which is 
expected to occur within the next two to four years. The Company's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.

On December 5, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that the Company leave in effect for 2018 the factors associated 
with the Company's compliance costs for the year 2017, with any under-collected amount for prior years deemed recovered before 
any current year amounts. Any under recovered amounts associated with 2018 will be reflected in the 2019 filing.

Rate ECR

The Company has established energy cost recovery rates under the Company's Rate ECR as approved by the Alabama PSC. Rates 
are based on an estimate of future energy costs and the current over or under recovered balance. Revenues recognized under Rate 
ECR and recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for the difference in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in 
current regulated rates. The difference in the recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed give rise to the over or under recovered 
amounts recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities. The Company, along with the Alabama PSC, continually monitors the over or 
under recovered cost balance to determine whether an adjustment to billing rates is required. Changes in the Rate ECR factor have 
no significant effect on the Company's net income, but will impact operating cash flows. Currently, the Alabama PSC may 
approve billing rates under Rate ECR of up to 5.910 cents per KWH.

In accordance with an accounting order issued on February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, the Company reclassified $36 million 
of its under recovered balance in Rate ECR to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through 
Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of the Company's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur 
within the next two to four years. The Company's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.

On December 5, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that the Company leave in effect for 2018 the energy cost 
recovery rates which began in 2017. Therefore, the Rate ECR factor as of January 1, 2018 remained at 2.015 cents per KWH. The 
rate will return to 5.910 cents per KWH in 2019, absent a further order from the Alabama PSC.

Rate NDR

Based on an order from the Alabama PSC, the Company maintains a reserve for operations and maintenance expenses to cover 
the cost of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. The order approves a separate monthly Rate 
NDR charge to customers consisting of two components. The first component is intended to establish and maintain a reserve 
balance for future storms and is an on-going part of customer billing. When the reserve balance falls below $50 million, a reserve 
establishment charge will be activated (and the on-going reserve maintenance charge concurrently suspended) until the reserve 
balance reaches $75 million. The second component of the Rate NDR charge is intended to allow recovery of any existing 
deferred storm-related operations and maintenance costs and any future reserve deficits over a 24-month period.

In December 2017, the reserve maintenance charge was suspended and the reserve establishment charge was activated as a result 
of the NDR balance falling below $50 million. The Company expects to collect approximately $16 million annually until the 
reserve balance is restored to $75 million. The NDR balance at December 31, 2017 was $38 million.

As revenue from the Rate NDR charge is recognized, an equal amount of operations and maintenance expenses related to the 
NDR will also be recognized. As a result, the Rate NDR charge will not have an effect on net income but will impact operating 
cash flows.

Environmental Accounting Order

Based on an order from the Alabama PSC, the Company is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered 
investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and 
closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset will be amortized and 
recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through 
Rate CNP Compliance. See "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information 
regarding environmental regulations.

Income Tax Matters

Federal Tax Reform Legislation

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Legislation was signed into law and became effective on January 1, 2018. The Tax 
Reform Legislation, among other things, reduces the federal corporate income tax rate to 21%, retains normalization provisions 
for public utility property and existing renewable energy incentives, and repeals the corporate alternative minimum tax.

16

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Regulated utility businesses can continue deducting all business interest expense and are not eligible for bonus depreciation on 
capital assets acquired and placed in service after September 27, 2017. Projects with binding contracts before September 28, 2017 
and placed in service after September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the Protecting Americans from Tax 
Hikes (PATH) Act.

In addition, under the Tax Reform Legislation, net operating losses (NOL) generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be 
carried back to previous tax years but can be carried forward indefinitely, with utilization limited to 80% of taxable income in the 
subsequent tax year. The projected reduction of Southern Company's consolidated income tax liability resulting from the tax rate 
reduction also delays the expected utilization of existing tax credit carryforwards.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, implementation of the Tax Reform Legislation resulted in an estimated net tax expense of 
$3 million, a $271 million decrease in regulatory assets, and a $2.0 billion increase in regulatory liabilities, primarily due to the 
impact of the reduction of the corporate income tax rate on deferred tax assets and liabilities.

The Tax Reform Legislation is subject to further interpretation and guidance from the IRS, as well as each respective state's 
adoption. In addition, the regulatory treatment of certain impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation is subject to the discretion of the 
FERC and the Alabama PSC. On January 31, 2018, SCS, on behalf of the traditional electric operating companies (including the 
Company), filed with the FERC a reduction to the Company's open access transmission tariff charge for 2018 to reflect the 
revised federal corporate tax rate. See Note 3 to the financial statements under "Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" for additional 
information.

See FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY – "Credit Rating Risk" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements under 
"Federal Tax Reform Legislation" for additional information.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

Bonus Depreciation

Under the Tax Reform Legislation, projects with binding contracts prior to September 28, 2017 and placed in service after 
September 27, 2017 remain eligible for bonus depreciation under the PATH Act. The PATH Act allowed for 50% bonus 
depreciation for 2015 through 2017, 40% bonus depreciation for 2018, and 30% bonus depreciation for 2019 and certain long-
lived assets placed in service in 2020. Based on provisional estimates, approximately $200 million of positive cash flows is 
expected to result from bonus depreciation for the 2017 tax year and approximately $90 million for the 2018 tax year. Should 
Southern Company have a NOL in 2018, all of these cash flows may not be fully realized in 2018. See Note 5 to the financial 
statements under "Current and Deferred Income Taxes" for additional information.

Other Matters

The Company is involved in various other matters being litigated and regulatory matters that could affect future earnings. In 
addition, the Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company's 
business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as 
regulation of air emissions and water discharges. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including 
property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements such as 
standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has 
included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous 
materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters.

The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation or regulatory matters cannot be predicted at this time; however, for 
current proceedings not specifically reported herein or in Note 3 to the financial statements, management does not anticipate that 
the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on the Company's financial 
statements. See Note 3 to the financial statements for a discussion of various other contingencies, regulatory matters, and other 
matters being litigated which may affect future earnings potential.

ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 
to the financial statements. In the application of these policies, certain estimates are made that may have a material impact on the 
Company's results of operations and related disclosures. Different assumptions and measurements could produce estimates that 

17

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

are significantly different from those recorded in the financial statements. Senior management has reviewed and discussed the 
following critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of Southern Company's Board of Directors.

Utility Regulation

The Company is subject to retail regulation by the Alabama PSC and wholesale regulation by the FERC. As a result, the Company 
applies accounting standards which require the financial statements to reflect the effects of rate regulation. Through the 
ratemaking process, the regulators may require the inclusion of costs or revenues in periods different than when they would be 
recognized by a non-regulated company. This treatment may result in the deferral of expenses and the recording of related 
regulatory assets based on anticipated future recovery through rates or the deferral of gains or creation of liabilities and the 
recording of related regulatory liabilities. The application of the accounting standards has a further effect on the Company's 
financial statements as a result of the estimates of allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. These estimates may differ 
from those actually incurred by the Company; therefore, the accounting estimates inherent in specific costs such as depreciation, 
AROs, and pension and other postretirement benefits have less of a direct impact on the Company's results of operations and 
financial condition than they would on a non-regulated company.

As reflected in Note 1 to the financial statements, significant regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded. Management 
reviews the ultimate recoverability of these regulatory assets and any requirement to refund these regulatory liabilities based on 
applicable regulatory guidelines and GAAP. However, adverse legislative, judicial, or regulatory actions could materially impact 
the amounts of such regulatory assets and liabilities and could adversely impact the Company's financial statements.

Federal Tax Reform Legislation

Following the enactment of Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax 
Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides for a measurement period of up to one year 
from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and 
comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, the Company considers all amounts 
recorded in the financial statements as a result of Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject 
to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its 
accounting. The ultimate impact of Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related regulatory 
assets and liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal 
Tax Reform Legislation" herein and Notes 3 and 5 to the financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" and 
"Current and Deferred Income Taxes," respectively, for additional information.

Asset Retirement Obligations

AROs are computed as the fair value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the period 
in which the liability is incurred. The costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset's 
useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates of 
future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the 
timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of 
future removal activities.

The liability for AROs primarily relates to the decommissioning of the Company's nuclear facility, Plant Farley, and facilities that 
are subject to the CCR Rule, principally ash ponds. In addition, the Company has retirement obligations related to various landfill 
sites, underground storage tanks, asbestos removal related to ongoing repair and maintenance, disposal of polychlorinated 
biphenyls in certain transformers, and disposal of sulfur hexafluoride gas in certain substation breakers. The Company also has 
identified retirement obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities, asbestos containing material within 
long-term assets not subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, and certain wireless communication towers. However, 
liabilities for the removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations 
related to these assets is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. 
A liability for these AROs will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of 
the ARO.

The cost estimates for AROs related to the disposal of CCR are based on information using various assumptions related to closure 
and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential methods for complying with 
the CCR Rule requirements for closure in place. As further analysis is performed and closure details are developed, the Company 
will continue to periodically update these cost estimates as necessary. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental 
Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations – Coal Combustion Residuals" herein and Note 1 to the financial statements 
under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" and "Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.

18

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Given the significant judgment involved in estimating AROs, the Company considers the liabilities for AROs to be critical 
accounting estimates.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

The Company's calculation of pension and other postretirement benefits expense is dependent on a number of assumptions. These 
assumptions include discount rates, healthcare cost trend rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, mortality rates, expected 
salary and wage increases, and other factors. Components of pension and other postretirement benefits expense include interest 
and service cost on the pension and other postretirement benefit plans, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of certain 
unrecognized costs and obligations. Actual results that differ from the assumptions utilized are accumulated and amortized over 
future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation in future periods. While the 
Company believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or significant changes in 
assumptions would affect its pension and other postretirement benefits costs and obligations.

Key elements in determining the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit expense are the expected long-term return 
on plan assets and the discount rate used to measure the benefit plan obligations and the periodic benefit plan expense for future 
periods. The expected long-term return on pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets is based on the Company's 
investment strategy, historical experience, and expectations for long-term rates of return that consider external actuarial advice. 
The Company determines the long-term return on plan assets by applying the long-term rate of expected returns on various asset 
classes to the Company's target asset allocation. For purposes of determining its liability related to the pension and other 
postretirement benefit plans, the Company discounts the future related cash flows using a single-point discount rate developed 
from the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to 
expected benefit payments. For 2015 and prior years, the Company computed the interest cost component of its net periodic 
pension and other postretirement benefit plan expense using the same single-point discount rate. Beginning in 2016, the Company 
adopted a full yield curve approach for calculating the interest cost component whereby the discount rate for each year is applied 
to the liability for that specific year. As a result, the interest cost component of net periodic pension and other postretirement 
benefit plan expense decreased by approximately $24 million in 2016.

A 25 basis point change in any significant assumption (discount rate, salaries, or long-term return on plan assets) would result in 
an $9 million or less change in total annual benefit expense and a $128 million or less change in projected obligations.

The Company recorded pension costs of $9 million, $11 million, and $48 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. 
Postretirement benefit costs for the Company were $3 million, $4 million, and $5 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. 
Such amounts are dependent on several factors including trust earnings and changes to the plans. A portion of pension and other 
postretirement benefit costs is capitalized based on construction-related labor charges. Pension and other postretirement benefit 
costs are a component of the regulated rates and generally do not have a long-term effect on net income.

See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information regarding pension and other postretirement benefits.

Contingent Obligations

The Company is subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, as well as other factors and conditions that subject 
it to environmental, litigation, and other risks. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL herein and Note 3 to the financial 
statements for more information regarding certain of these contingencies. The Company periodically evaluates its exposure to 
such risks and records reserves for those matters where a non-tax-related loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable. 
The adequacy of reserves can be significantly affected by external events or conditions that can be unpredictable; thus, the 
ultimate outcome of such matters could materially affect the Company's results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Revenue

In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting 
standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue 
from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of 
goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures 
regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.

Most of the Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide electricity without a 
defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual commitments, including PPAs.

19

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change 
the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as energy-related derivatives, 
are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed separately from revenues under ASC 
606. The Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be 
accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.

The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified 
retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to 
apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when 
identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Under the 
modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect adjustment to 
retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative information on 2018 
financial statement line items under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment.

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to 
recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, 
measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain 
components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is 
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 
2019.

The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along with the related changes to internal controls and 
accounting policies that will support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially 
completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant 
leases relate to cellular towers, railcars, and a PPA where the Company is the lessee and outdoor lighting and to land where the 
Company is the lessor. The Company is currently analyzing pole attachment agreements and a lease determination has not been 
made at this time. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a 
significant impact on the Company's balance sheet.

Other

On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the 
Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires 
that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the 
other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement 
outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. 
However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied 
retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and 
postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic pension 
and postretirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods beginning 
after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs will result 
in a decrease in the Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected to result in 
a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 effective January 
1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.

On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to 
Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. 
ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related 
presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective 
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective 
January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements. 

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

Overview

The Company's financial condition remained stable at December 31, 2017. The Company's cash requirements primarily consist of 
funding ongoing operations, common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities. Capital expenditures and other 

20

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

investing activities include investments to meet projected long-term demand requirements, to maintain existing generation 
facilities, to comply with environmental regulations including adding environmental modifications to certain existing generating 
units, to expand and improve transmission and distribution facilities, and for restoration following major storms. Operating cash 
flows provide a substantial portion of the Company's cash needs. For the three-year period from 2018 through 2020, the 
Company's projected common stock dividends, capital expenditures, and debt maturities are expected to exceed operating cash 
flows. The Company plans to finance future cash needs in excess of its operating cash flows primarily through external securities 
issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, or equity contributions from Southern Company. The Company plans to use 
commercial paper to manage seasonal variations in operating cash flows and for other working capital needs. The Company 
intends to continue to monitor its access to short-term and long-term capital markets as well as its bank credit arrangements to 
meet future capital and liquidity needs. See "Sources of Capital," "Financing Activities," and "Capital Requirements and 
Contractual Obligations" herein for additional information.

The Company's investments in the qualified pension plan and the nuclear decommissioning trust funds increased in value as of 
December 31, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016. No contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year 
ended December 31, 2017 and no mandatory contributions to the qualified pension plan are anticipated during 2018. The 
Company's funding obligations for the nuclear decommissioning trust fund are based on the most recent site study, and the next 
study is expected to be conducted in 2018. See Notes 1 and 2 to the financial statements under "Nuclear Decommissioning" and 
"Pension Plans," respectively, for additional information.

Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.8 billion for 2017, a decrease of $112 million as compared to 2016. The 
decrease in cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to the timing of income tax payments in 2017 and the 
receipt of income tax refunds in 2016 as a result of bonus depreciation, partially offset by the voluntary contribution to the 
qualified pension plan in 2016. Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $1.9 billion for 2016, a decrease of $193 
million as compared to 2015. The decrease in cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to the collection of fuel 
cost recovery revenues and the voluntary contribution to the qualified pension plan, partially offset by the timing of income tax 
payments and refunds associated with bonus depreciation. 

Net cash used for investing activities totaled $1.9 billion for 2017, $1.4 billion for 2016, and $1.5 billion for 2015. These 
activities were primarily related to gross property additions for environmental, steam generation, distribution, and transmission 
assets. 

Net cash provided from financing activities totaled $163 million in 2017 primarily due to issuances of long-term debt and 
additional capital contributions from Southern Company, partially offset by the payment of common stock dividends and 
maturities of long-term debt. Net cash used for financing activities totaled $285 million in 2016 primarily due to the payment of 
common stock dividends and a redemption of long-term debt, partially offset by issuances of long-term debt and additional capital 
contributions from Southern Company. Fluctuations in cash flow from financing activities vary from year to year based on capital 
needs and the maturity or redemption of securities.

Significant balance sheet changes for 2017 included increases of $1.3 billion in property, plant, and equipment primarily due to 
additions to distribution and transmission facilities and environmental and steam generation assets and $1.1 billion in long-term 
debt. Other significant changes included an increase of $2.0 billion in deferred credits related to income taxes and decreases of 
$1.9 billion in accumulated deferred income taxes primarily due to the change in tax rate resulting from Tax Reform Legislation 
and $0.6 billion in securities due within one year. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Income Tax Matters – Federal Tax 
Reform Legislation" herein and Note 5 to the financial statements for additional information.

The Company's ratio of common equity to total capitalization plus short-term debt was 46.3% and 46.2% at December 31, 2017 
and 2016, respectively. See Note 6 to the financial statements for additional information.

Sources of Capital

The Company plans to obtain the funds to meet its future capital needs from sources similar to those used in the past, which were 
primarily from operating cash flows, external security issuances, borrowings from financial institutions, and equity contributions 
from Southern Company. However, the amount, type, and timing of any future financings, if needed, will depend upon prevailing 
market conditions, regulatory approval, and other factors.

Security issuances are subject to regulatory approval by the Alabama PSC. Additionally, with respect to the public offering of 
securities, the Company files registration statements with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The amounts of 
securities authorized by the Alabama PSC are continuously monitored and appropriate filings are made to ensure flexibility in the 
capital markets.

21

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The Company obtains financing separately without credit support from any affiliate. See Note 6 to the financial statements under 
"Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information. The Southern Company system does not maintain a centralized cash or 
money pool. Therefore, funds of the Company are not commingled with funds of any other company in the Southern Company 
system.

The Company's current liabilities sometimes exceed current assets because of long-term debt maturities and the periodic use of 
short-term debt as a funding source, as well as significant seasonal fluctuations in cash needs.

At December 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $544 million of cash and cash equivalents. Committed credit 
arrangements with banks at December 31, 2017 were as follows:

2018

Expires
2020
(in millions)

2022

Total

Unused

Term Out

No Term Out

Expires Within One Year

(in millions)

(in millions)
— $

35

$

35

$

500

$

800

$

1,335

$

1,335

$

See Note 6 to the financial statements under "Bank Credit Arrangements" for additional information.

In May 2017 and September 2017, the Company amended its $800 million and $500 million multi-year credit arrangements, 
which, among other things, extended the maturity dates from 2020 to 2022 and 2018 to 2020, respectively, as reflected in the table 
above.

Most of these bank credit arrangements, as well as the Company's term loan arrangements, contain covenants that limit debt levels 
and contain cross-acceleration provisions to other indebtedness (including guarantee obligations) of the Company. Such cross-
acceleration provisions to other indebtedness would trigger an event of default if the Company defaulted on indebtedness, the 
payment of which was then accelerated. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. None 
of the bank credit arrangements contain material adverse change clauses at the time of borrowings.

Subject to applicable market conditions, the Company expects to renew or replace its bank credit arrangements as needed, prior to 
expiration. In connection therewith, the Company may extend the maturity dates and/or increase or decrease the lending 
commitments thereunder.

A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the Company's pollution control revenue 
bonds and commercial paper programs. The amount of variable rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding requiring 
liquidity support was $854 million as of December 31, 2017. In addition, at December 31, 2017, the Company had $120 million 
of fixed rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding that were required to be remarketed within the next 12 months.

The Company also has substantial cash flow from operating activities and access to the capital markets, including a commercial 
paper program, to meet liquidity needs. The Company may meet short-term cash needs through its commercial paper program. 
The Company may also meet short-term cash needs through a Southern Company subsidiary organized to issue and sell 
commercial paper at the request and for the benefit of the Company and the other traditional electric operating companies. 
Proceeds from such issuances for the benefit of the Company are loaned directly to the Company. The obligations of each 
traditional electric operating company under these arrangements are several and there is no cross-affiliate credit support.

Details of short-term borrowings were as follows:

December 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

December 31, 2015

Amount
Outstanding
(in millions)

$

$

$

3

—

—

Short-term Debt at the End
of the Period

Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate

Short-term Debt During the Period (*)
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate

Average
Amount
Outstanding
(in millions)

Maximum
Amount
Outstanding
(in millions)

3.7% $

— %

— %

$

$

25

16

14

1.3% $

0.6 %

0.2 %

$

$

223

200

100

(*)  Average and maximum amounts are based upon daily balances during the 12-month periods ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.

The Company believes that the need for working capital can be adequately met by utilizing commercial paper programs, lines of 
credit, and operating cash flows.

22

 
 
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Financing Activities

In February 2017, the Company repaid at maturity $200 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2007A 5.55% Senior Notes.

In March 2017, the Company issued $550 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 2.45% Senior Notes due March 30, 
2022. The proceeds were used to repay the Company's short-term indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including the 
Company's continuous construction program.

In August 2017, the Company repaid at maturity $36.1 million aggregate principal amount of Series 1993-A, 1993-B, and 1993-C 
Industrial Development Board of the City of Mobile, Alabama Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (Alabama Power 
Company Project).

In September 2017, the Company issued 10 million shares ($250 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.00% Class A Preferred 
Stock, Cumulative, Par Value $1 Per Share (Stated Capital $25 Per Share). The proceeds were used in October 2017 to redeem all 
2 million shares ($50 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.50% Series Preference Stock, 6 million shares ($150 million aggregate 
stated capital) of 6.45% Series Preference Stock, and 1.52 million shares ($38 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.83% Class A 
Preferred Stock and for other general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.

In October 2017, the Company repaid at maturity $325 million aggregate principal amount of Series Q 5.50% Senior Notes.

In November 2017, the Company issued $550 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017B 3.70% Senior Notes due 
December 1, 2047. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction 
program.

In addition to any financings that may be necessary to meet capital requirements and contractual obligations, the Company plans 
to continue, when economically feasible, a program to retire higher-cost securities and replace these obligations with lower-cost 
capital if market conditions permit.

Credit Rating Risk

At December 31, 2017, the Company did not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment 
schedules or terminations as a result of a credit rating downgrade.

There are certain contracts that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in the event of a credit rating change to BBB 
and/or Baa2 or below. These contracts are primarily for physical electricity purchases, fuel purchases, fuel transportation and 
storage, energy price risk management, and transmission.

The maximum potential collateral requirements under these contracts at December 31, 2017 were as follows:

Credit Ratings

At BBB and/or Baa2

At BBB- and/or Baa3

Below BBB- and/or Baa3

Maximum Potential
Collateral
Requirements
(in millions)

$

$

$

1

2

323

Included in these amounts are certain agreements that could require collateral in the event that either the Company or Georgia 
Power has a credit rating change to below investment grade. Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company 
guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. Additionally, a credit rating downgrade could impact the ability of the Company to access 
capital markets and would be likely to impact the cost at which it does so.

On March 24, 2017, S&P revised its consolidated credit rating outlook for Southern Company and its subsidiaries (including the 
Company) from stable to negative.

On January 19, 2018, Moody's revised its rating outlook for the Company from stable to negative.

While it is unclear how the credit rating agencies and regulatory authorities may respond to the Tax Reform Legislation, certain 
financial metrics, such as the funds from operations to debt percentage, used by the credit rating agencies to assess Southern 
Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company, may be negatively impacted. Absent actions by Southern Company and its 
subsidiaries, including the Company, to mitigate the resulting impacts, which, among other alternatives, could include adjusting 
capital structure and/or monetizing regulatory assets, the Company's credit ratings could be negatively affected. See Note 3 to the 
financial statements under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" for additional information.

23

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Market Price Risk

Due to cost-based rate regulation and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the Company continues to have limited exposure 
to market volatility in interest rates, commodity fuel prices, and prices of electricity. To manage the volatility attributable to these 
exposures, the Company nets the exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters into various derivative 
transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company's policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and risk 
management practices. The Company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes and mandates strict 
adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques including, but not 
limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis.

To mitigate future exposure to changes in interest rates, the Company may enter into derivatives designated as hedges. The 
weighted average interest rate on $1.1 billion of long-term variable interest rate exposure at December 31, 2017 was 2.3%. If the 
Company sustained a 100 basis point change in interest rates for all long-term variable interest rate exposure, the change would 
affect annualized interest expense by approximately $11 million at December 31, 2017. See Note 1 to the financial statements 
under "Financial Instruments" and Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information.

To mitigate residual risks relative to movements in electricity prices, the Company enters into physical fixed-price contracts for 
the purchase and sale of electricity through the wholesale electricity market and financial hedge contracts for natural gas 
purchases. The Company continues to manage a retail fuel-hedging program implemented per the guidelines of the Alabama PSC. 
The Company had no material change in market risk exposure for the year ended December 31, 2017 when compared to the year 
ended December 31, 2016.

In addition, Rate ECR allows the recovery of specific costs associated with the sales of natural gas that become necessary due to 
operating considerations at the Company's electric generating facilities. Rate ECR also allows recovery of the cost of financial 
instruments used for hedging market price risk up to 75% of the budgeted annual amount of natural gas purchases. The Company 
may not engage in natural gas hedging activities that extend beyond a rolling 42-month window. Also, the premiums paid for 
natural gas financial options may not exceed 5% of the Company's natural gas budget for that year.

The changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts are substantially attributable to both the volume and the price of 
natural gas. For the years ended December 31, the changes in fair value of energy-related derivative contracts, the majority of 
which are composed of regulatory hedges, were as follows:

Contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period, assets (liabilities), net

Contracts realized or settled
Current period changes(*)
Contracts outstanding at the end of the period, assets (liabilities), net

2017
Changes

2016
Changes

Fair Value
(in millions)

$

$

12
(1)
(17)
(6)

$

$

(54)
39

27

12

(*)  Current period changes also include the changes in fair value of new contracts entered into during the period, if any.

The net hedge volumes of energy-related derivative contracts, for the years ended December 31 were as follows:

Commodity – Natural gas swaps

Commodity – Natural gas options

Total hedge volume

2017

2016

mmBtu Volume
(in millions)

64

5

69

68

6

74

The weighted average swap contract cost above market prices was approximately $0.08 per mmBtu as of December 31, 2017 
and below market prices was approximately $0.14 per mmBtu as of December 31, 2016. The change in option fair value is 
primarily attributable to the volatility of the market and the underlying change in the natural gas price. Substantially all of the 
natural gas hedge gains and losses are recovered through the Company's retail energy cost recovery clause.

24

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, substantially all of the Company's energy-related derivative contracts were designated as 
regulatory hedges and were related to the Company's fuel-hedging program. Therefore, gains and losses are initially recorded as 
regulatory liabilities and assets, respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as they are recovered through the energy cost 
recovery clause. Certain other gains and losses on energy-related derivatives, designated as cash flow hedges, are initially 
deferred in OCI before being recognized in income in the same period as the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on energy-
related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges are recognized in the statements of income as 
incurred and were not material for any year presented.

The Company uses over-the-counter contracts that are not exchange traded but are fair valued using prices which are market 
observable, and thus fall into Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of 
fair value measurements. The maturities of the energy-related derivative contracts, which are primarily Level 2 of the fair value 
hierarchy, at December 31, 2017 were as follows:

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Fair value of contracts outstanding at end of period

Total

Fair Value 

$

$

—

6

—

6

Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2017

Maturity

Year 1 
(in millions)

Years 2&3

$

$

—

4

—

4

$

$

—

2

—

2

The Company is exposed to market price risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to energy-related and interest rate 
derivative contracts. The Company only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment 
grade credit ratings by Moody's and S&P, or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. 
Therefore, the Company does not anticipate market risk exposure from nonperformance by the counterparties. For additional 
information, see Note 1 to the financial statements under "Financial Instruments" and Note 11 to the financial statements.

Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations

The construction program of the Company is currently estimated to total $2.2 billion for 2018, $1.6 billion for 2019, $1.6 billion 
for 2020, $1.7 billion for 2021, and $1.4 billion for 2022. The construction program includes capital expenditures related to 
contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under long-term service agreements. 
Estimated capital expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations included in these amounts are $581 million for 
2018, $110 million for 2019, $163 million for 2020, $258 million for 2021, and $268 million for 2022. These estimated 
expenditures do not include any potential compliance costs associated with the regulation of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired 
electric generating units. See FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and 
Regulations" and "– Global Climate Issues" herein for additional information.

The Company also anticipates costs associated with closure in place and monitoring of ash ponds in accordance with the CCR 
Rule, which are reflected in the Company's ARO liabilities. These costs, which could change as the Company continues to refine 
its assumptions underlying the cost estimates and evaluate the method and timing of compliance activities, are estimated to be 
$0.3 million for 2018, $111 million for 2019, $90 million for 2020, $94 million for 2021, and $96 million for 2022. See Note 1 to 
the financial statements under "Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal" for additional information. Costs 
associated with the CCR Rule are expected to be recovered through Rate CNP Compliance.

The construction program is subject to periodic review and revision, and actual construction costs may vary from these estimates 
because of numerous factors. These factors include: changes in business conditions; changes in load projections; changes in 
environmental laws and regulations; the outcome of any legal challenges to the environmental rules; changes in generating plants, 
including unit retirements and replacements and adding or changing fuel sources at existing generating units, to meet regulatory 
requirements; changes in the expected environmental compliance program; changes in FERC rules and regulations; Alabama PSC 
approvals; changes in legislation; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment, and materials; project scope and design 
changes; storm impacts; and the cost of capital. In addition, there can be no assurance that costs related to capital expenditures 
will be fully recovered.

25

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As a result of NRC requirements, the Company has external trust funds for nuclear decommissioning costs; however, the 
Company currently has no additional funding requirements. For additional information, see Note 1 to the financial statements 
under "Nuclear Decommissioning."

In addition, as discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company provides postretirement benefits to substantially all 
employees and funds trusts to the extent required by the Alabama PSC and the FERC.

Other funding requirements related to obligations associated with scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as the related 
interest, derivative obligations, pension and other postretirement benefit plans, preferred stock dividends, leases, and other 
purchase commitments are detailed in the contractual obligations table that follows. See Notes 1, 2, 6, 7, and 11 to the financial 
statements for additional information.

26

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Contractual Obligations

Contractual obligations at December 31, 2017 were as follows:

Long-term debt(a) —

Principal
Interest

Preferred stock dividends(b)
Financial derivative obligations(c)
Operating leases(d)
Capital Lease
Purchase commitments —

Capital(e)
Fuel(f)
Purchased power(g)
Other(h)

Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(i)
Total

2018

2019-
2020

2021-
2022
(in millions)

After
2022

Total

$

—
304
15
6
21
1

2,053
974
78
47

19

$

450
598
29
4
40
1

2,972
1,197
171
73

36

$

1,060
561
29
—
24
1

2,914
459
186
59

—

$

6,176
4,408
—
—
20
2

—
238
606
313

—

$

7,686
5,871
73
10
105
5

7,939
2,868
1,041
492

55

$

3,518

$

5,571

$

5,293

$ 11,763

$ 26,145

(a)  All amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates. The Company plans to continue, when economically feasible, to retire higher-cost securities and 

replace these obligations with lower-cost capital if market conditions permit. Variable rate interest obligations are estimated based on rates as of December 31, 
2017, as reflected in the statements of capitalization. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest 
rate risk. Long-term debt excludes capital lease amounts (shown separately).

(b)  Preferred stock does not mature; therefore, amounts are provided for the next five years only.

(c)  Includes derivative liabilities related to cash flow hedges of forecasted debt, as well as energy-related derivatives. For additional information, see Notes 1 and 

11 to the financial statements.

(d)  Excludes PPAs that are accounted for as leases and are included in purchased power.

(e)  The Company provides estimated capital expenditures for a five-year period, including capital expenditures associated with environmental regulations. These 
amounts exclude contractual purchase commitments for nuclear fuel and capital expenditures covered under long-term service agreements which are reflected 
in "Fuel" and "Other," respectively. At December 31, 2017, purchase commitments were outstanding in connection with the construction program. See 
FUTURE EARNINGS POTENTIAL – "Environmental Matters – Environmental Laws and Regulations" herein for additional information.

(f)  Includes commitments to purchase coal, nuclear fuel, and natural gas, as well as the related transportation and storage. In most cases, these contracts contain 
provisions for price escalation, minimum purchase levels, and other financial commitments. Natural gas purchase commitments are based on various indices 
at the time of delivery. Amounts reflected for natural gas purchase commitments have been estimated based on the New York Mercantile Exchange future 
prices at December 31, 2017.

(g)  Estimated minimum long-term obligations for various long-term commitments for the purchase of capacity and energy.

(h)  Includes long-term service agreements and contracts for the procurement of limestone. Long-term service agreements include price escalation based on 

inflation indices.

(i)  The Company forecasts contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans over a three-year period. The Company anticipates no mandatory 
contributions to the qualified pension plan during the next three years. Amounts presented represent estimated benefit payments for the nonqualified pension 
plans, estimated non-trust benefit payments for the other postretirement benefit plans, and estimated contributions to the other postretirement benefit plan 
trusts, all of which will be made from the Company's corporate assets. See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional information related to the pension 
and other postretirement benefit plans, including estimated benefit payments. Certain benefit payments will be made through the related benefit plans. Other 
benefit payments will be made from the Company's corporate assets.

27

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The Company's 2017 Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other 
things, statements concerning regulated rates, customer and sales growth, economic conditions, fuel and environmental cost 
recovery and other rate actions, current and proposed environmental regulations and related compliance plans and estimated 
expenditures, pending or potential litigation matters, access to sources of capital, projections for the qualified pension plan, 
postretirement benefit plans, and nuclear decommissioning trust fund contributions, financing activities, filings with state and 
federal regulatory authorities, impacts of the Tax Reform Legislation, federal income tax benefits, estimated sales and purchases 
under power sale and purchase agreements, and estimated construction and other plans and expenditures. In some cases, forward-
looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," 
"believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other similar 
terminology. There are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-
looking statements; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated results will be realized. These factors include:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes, including environmental laws and regulations 
governing air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, and also changes in tax and other laws and 
regulations to which the Company is subject, as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations;

the uncertainty surrounding the recently enacted Tax Reform Legislation, including implementing regulations and IRS 
interpretations, actions that may be taken in response by regulatory authorities, and its impact, if any, on the credit 
ratings of the Company;

current and future litigation or regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries;

the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which the Company operates;

variations in demand for electricity, including those relating to weather, the general economy, population and business 
growth (and declines), the effects of energy conservation and efficiency measures, including from the development and 
deployment of alternative energy sources such as self-generation and distributed generation technologies, and any 
potential economic impacts resulting from federal fiscal decisions;

available sources and costs of fuels;

effects of inflation;

the ability to control costs and avoid cost overruns during the development and construction of facilities, to construct 
facilities in accordance with the requirements of permits and licenses, and to satisfy any environmental performance 
standards;

investment performance of the Company's employee and retiree benefit plans and nuclear decommissioning trust funds;

advances in technology;

state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including rate actions 
relating to fuel and other cost recovery mechanisms;

the inherent risks involved in operating nuclear generating facilities, including environmental, health, regulatory, natural 
disaster, terrorism, and financial risks;
the ability to successfully operate generating, transmission, and distribution facilities and the successful performance of 
necessary corporate functions;

internal restructuring or other restructuring options that may be pursued;

potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, which cannot be assured to be 
completed or beneficial to the Company;

the ability of counterparties of the Company to make payments as and when due and to perform as required;

the ability to obtain new short- and long-term contracts with wholesale customers;

the direct or indirect effect on the Company's business resulting from cyber intrusion or physical attack and the threat of 
physical attacks;

interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts;

changes in the Company's credit ratings, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, and collateral 
requirements;

the impacts of any sovereign financial issues, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, impacts on 
foreign currency exchange rates, counterparty performance, and the economy in general;

28

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

the ability of the Company to obtain additional generating capacity (or sell excess generating capacity) at competitive 
prices;

catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and other storms, droughts, 
pandemic health events such as influenzas, or other similar occurrences;

the direct or indirect effects on the Company's business resulting from incidents affecting the U.S. electric grid or 
operation of generating resources;

the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard-setting bodies; and

other factors discussed elsewhere herein and in other reports (including the Form 10-K) filed by the Company from time 
to time with the SEC.

The Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

29

[This page intentionally left blank]

30

STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Operating Revenues:

Retail revenues

Wholesale revenues, non-affiliates

Wholesale revenues, affiliates

Other revenues

Total operating revenues
Operating Expenses:

Fuel

Purchased power, non-affiliates

Purchased power, affiliates

Other operations and maintenance
Depreciation and amortization

Taxes other than income taxes

Total operating expenses
Operating Income
Other Income and (Expense):

Allowance for equity funds used during construction

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized

Other income (expense), net

Total other income and (expense)
Earnings Before Income Taxes
Income taxes

Net Income

Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock

2017

2016
(in millions)

2015

$

5,458

$

5,322

$

5,234

276

97

208

6,039

1,225

170

158

1,652
736

384

4,325

1,714

39
(305)
(14)
(280)
1,434

568

866

18

283

69

215

5,889

1,297

166

168

1,510
703

380

4,224

1,665

28
(302)
(21)
(295)
1,370

531

839

17

241

84

209

5,768

1,342

171

180

1,501
643

368

4,205

1,563

60
(274)
(32)
(246)
1,317

506

811

26

785

Net Income After Dividends on Preferred and Preference Stock

$

848

$

822

$

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

31

 
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Net Income

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Qualifying hedges:

2017

2016
(in millions)

2015

$

866

$

839

$

811

Changes in fair value, net of tax of $(1), $(1), and $(3), respectively

Reclassification adjustment for amounts included in net income,
   net of tax of $2, $2, and $1, respectively

Total other comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive Income

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

1

3

4

(2)

4

2

$

870

$

841

$

(5)

2
(3)
808

32

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income
   to net cash provided from operating activities —

Depreciation and amortization, total
Deferred income taxes
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
Pension and postretirement funding
Other, net
Changes in certain current assets and liabilities —

-Receivables
-Other current assets
-Accounts payable
-Accrued taxes
-Retail fuel cost over recovery
-Other current liabilities

Net cash provided from operating activities
Investing Activities:
Property additions
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund purchases
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales
Cost of removal net of salvage
Change in construction payables
Other investing activities
Net cash used for investing activities
Financing Activities:
Increase in notes payable, net
Proceeds —

Senior notes
Preferred stock
Pollution control revenue bonds
Other long-term debt
Capital contributions from parent company

Redemptions and repurchases —

Senior notes
Preferred and preference stock
Pollution control revenue bonds
Payment of common stock dividends
Other financing activities
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid (received) during the period for —

Interest (net of $15, $11, and $22 capitalized, respectively)
Income taxes (net of refunds)

Noncash transactions — Accrued property additions at year-end

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

$

$

33

2017

2016
(in millions)

2015

$

866

$

839

$

811

888
409
(39)
(2)
(14)

(168)
(16)
71
(84)
(76)
2
1,837

(1,882)
(237)
237
(112)
161
(43)
(1,876)

3

1,100
250
—
—
361

(525)
(238)
(36)
(714)
(38)
163
124
420
544

285
236
245

$

$

844
407
(28)
(133)
(102)

94
1
73
93
(162)
23
1,949

(1,272)
(352)
351
(94)
(37)
(34)
(1,438)

—

400
—
—
45
260

(200)
—
—
(765)
(25)
(285)
226
194
420

277
(108)
84

$

$

780
388
(60)
—
15

(160)
40
3
138
191
(4)
2,142

(1,367)
(439)
438
(71)
(15)
(34)
(1,488)

—

975
—
80
—
22

(650)
(412)
(134)
(571)
(43)
(733)
(79)
273
194

250
121
121

BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2017 and 2016 
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Assets

Current Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

Receivables —

Customer accounts receivable

Unbilled revenues

Affiliated

Other accounts and notes receivable

Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts

Fossil fuel stock

Materials and supplies

Other regulatory assets, current
Other current assets

Total current assets
Property, Plant, and Equipment:

In service

Less: Accumulated provision for depreciation

Plant in service, net of depreciation

Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost

Construction work in progress

Total property, plant, and equipment
Other Property and Investments:

Equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries

Nuclear decommissioning trusts, at fair value

Miscellaneous property and investments

Total other property and investments
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:

Deferred charges related to income taxes

Deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues

Other regulatory assets, deferred

Other deferred charges and assets

Total deferred charges and other assets
Total Assets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

34

2017

2016

(in millions)

$

544

$

420

355

162

43

55
(9)
184

458

124
90

348

146

40

27
(10)
205

435

149
45

2,006

1,805

27,326

9,563

17,763

339

908

26,031

9,112

16,919

336

491

19,010

17,746

67

903

124

1,094

239

54

1,272

189

1,754

66

792

112

970

525

150

1,157

163

1,995

$

23,864

$

22,516

 
 
2017

2016

(in millions)

$

— $

327

585

92

9

45

77

205
1

59

1,400

7,628

2,760

2,082

112

304

1,702

609

84

63

7,716

16,744

291

—

6,829

$

23,864

$

561

297

433

88

45

42

78

193
85

76

1,898

6,535

4,654

65

110

300

1,503

684

100

63

7,479

15,912

85

196

6,323

22,516

BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31, 2017 and 2016 
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity

Current Liabilities:

Securities due within one year

Accounts payable —

Affiliated

Other

Customer deposits

Accrued taxes —

Accrued income taxes

Other accrued taxes

Accrued interest

Accrued compensation
Other regulatory liabilities, current

Other current liabilities

Total current liabilities
Long-Term Debt (See accompanying statements)
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:

Accumulated deferred income taxes

Deferred credits related to income taxes

Accumulated deferred ITCs

Employee benefit obligations

Asset retirement obligations

Other cost of removal obligations

Other regulatory liabilities, deferred

Other deferred credits and liabilities

Total deferred credits and other liabilities
Total Liabilities
Redeemable Preferred Stock (See accompanying statements)
Preference Stock (See accompanying statements)
Common Stockholder's Equity (See accompanying statements)
Total Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity
Commitments and Contingent Matters (See notes)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

35

 
STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
At December 31, 2017 and 2016 
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Long-Term Debt:
Long-term debt payable to affiliated trusts —

Variable rate (4.44% at 12/31/17) due 2042

Long-term notes payable —

5.50% to 5.55% due 2017
5.125% due 2019
3.375% due 2020
2.38% to 3.95% due 2021
2.45% to 5.875% due 2022
2.80% to 6.125% due 2023-2047
Variable rates (2.55% to 2.786% at 12/31/17) due 2021

Total long-term notes payable
Other long-term debt —

Pollution control revenue bonds —
1.625% to 1.85% due 2034
Variable rates (0.77% to 0.79% at 1/1/17) due 2017
Variable rates (1.86% to 1.87% at 12/31/17) due 2021
Variable rates (1.70% to 1.87% at 12/31/17) due 2024-2038

Total other long-term debt
Capitalized lease obligations
Unamortized debt premium (discount), net
Unamortized debt issuance expense
Total long-term debt (annual interest requirement — $305 million)
Less amount due within one year
Long-term debt excluding amount due within one year
Redeemable Preferred Stock:
Cumulative redeemable preferred stock

$100 par or stated value — 4.20% to 4.92%

Authorized — 3,850,000 shares
Outstanding — 475,115 shares

$1 par value —

Authorized — 27,500,000 shares
Outstanding — 2017: 5.00% — 10,000,000 shares: $25 stated value
  — 2016: 5.83% — 1,520,000 shares: $25 stated value

(annual dividend requirement — $15 million)

Total redeemable preferred stock
Preference Stock:

$1 par value — 6.45% to 6.50%
Authorized — 40,000,000 shares
Outstanding — 2017: no shares

2017

2016

2017

2016

(in millions)

(percent of total)

$

206

$

206

—
200
250
220
750
4,975
25
6,420

207
—
65
788
1,060
4
(11)
(51)
7,628
—
7,628

48

243
291

525
200
250
220
200
4,425
25
5,845

207
36
65
788
1,096
4
(9)
(46)
7,096
561
6,535

48

37
85

51.7%

49.7%

2.0

0.7

 — 2016: 8,000,000 shares (non-cumulative): $25 stated value

—

196

—

1.5

Common Stockholder's Equity:
Common stock, par value $40 per share —
Authorized — 40,000,000 shares
Outstanding — 30,537,500 shares

Paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total common stockholder's equity
Total Capitalization

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

36

1,222
2,986
2,647
(26)
6,829
14,748

$

1,222
2,613
2,518
(30)
6,323
13,139

$

46.3
100.0%

48.1
100.0%

 
 
STATEMENTS OF COMMON STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Number of
Common
Shares
Issued

Common
Stock

Paid-In
Capital

Retained
Earnings

(in millions)

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

Total

Balance at December 31, 2014

31

$

1,222

$

2,304

$

2,255

$

(29) $ 5,752

Net income after dividends on preferred

and preference stock

Capital contributions from parent company

Other comprehensive income (loss)

Cash dividends on common stock
Other

Balance at December 31, 2015

Net income after dividends on preferred
and preference stock

Capital contributions from parent company

Other comprehensive income (loss)

Cash dividends on common stock
Balance at December 31, 2016

Net income after dividends on preferred

and preference stock

Capital contributions from parent company

Other comprehensive income (loss)

Cash dividends on common stock
Other
Balance at December 31, 2017

—

—

—

—

—

31

—

—

—

—
31

—

—

—

—
—
31

—

—

—

—

—

—

37

—

—

—

1,222

2,341

—

—

—

—
1,222

—

—

—

—
—
1,222

$

$

—

272

—

—
2,613

—

373

—

—
—
2,986

$

785

—

—
(571)
(8)
2,461

822

—

—
(765)
2,518

848

—

—
(714)
(5)
2,647

—

—
(3)
—

—
(32)

—

—

2

—
(30)

—

—

4

785

37

(3)

(571)

(8)

5,992

822

272

2

(765)
6,323

848

373

4

(714)
—
(5)
—
(26) $ 6,829

$

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

37

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Index to the Notes to Financial Statements

Note

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Page

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.........................................................................
Retirement Benefits ................................................................................................................
Contingencies and Regulatory Matters...................................................................................
Joint Ownership Agreements..................................................................................................
Income Taxes ..........................................................................................................................
Financing ................................................................................................................................
Commitments..........................................................................................................................
Stock Compensation ...............................................................................................................
Nuclear Insurance ...................................................................................................................
Fair Value Measurements .......................................................................................................
Derivatives..............................................................................................................................
Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited).........................................................................

39

47

58

62

63

65

68

69

71

72

74

77

38

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

General

Alabama Power Company (the Company) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company, which is the parent company of 
the Company and three other traditional electric operating companies, Southern Power, Southern Company Gas (as of July 1, 
2016), SCS, Southern Linc, Southern Company Holdings, Inc. (Southern Holdings), Southern Nuclear, PowerSecure, Inc. 
(PowerSecure) (as of May 9, 2016), and other direct and indirect subsidiaries. The traditional electric operating companies – the 
Company, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, and Mississippi Power – are vertically integrated utilities providing electric service in four 
Southeastern states. The Company provides electric service to retail and wholesale customers within its traditional service 
territory located in the State of Alabama in addition to wholesale customers in the Southeast. Southern Power develops, 
constructs, acquires, owns, and manages power generation assets, including renewable energy projects, and sells electricity at 
market-based rates in the wholesale market. Southern Company Gas distributes natural gas through utilities in seven states and is 
involved in several other complementary businesses including gas marketing services, wholesale gas services, and gas midstream 
operations. SCS, the system service company, provides, at cost, specialized services to Southern Company and its subsidiary 
companies. Southern Linc provides digital wireless communications for use by Southern Company and its subsidiary companies 
and also markets these services to the public and provides fiber optics services within the Southeast. Southern Holdings is an 
intermediate holding company subsidiary, primarily for Southern Company's investments in leveraged leases and for other 
electric services. Southern Nuclear operates and provides services to the Southern Company system's nuclear power plants, 
including the Company's Plant Farley. PowerSecure is a provider of products and services in the areas of distributed generation, 
energy efficiency, and utility infrastructure.

The equity method is used for subsidiaries in which the Company has significant influence but does not control and for variable 
interest entities (VIEs) where the Company has an equity investment, but is not the primary beneficiary.

The Company is subject to regulation by the FERC and the Alabama PSC. As such, the Company's financial statements reflect the 
effects of rate regulation in accordance with GAAP and comply with the accounting policies and practices prescribed by its 
regulatory commissions. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates, and the 
actual results may differ from those estimates. Certain prior years' data presented in the financial statements have been 
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Revenue

In 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), replacing the existing accounting 
standard and industry specific guidance for revenue recognition with a five-step model for recognizing and measuring revenue 
from contracts with customers. The underlying principle of the new standard is to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of 
goods or services to customers at the amount expected to be collected. The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures 
regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows arising from contracts with customers.

Most of the Company's revenue, including energy provided to customers, is from tariff offerings that provide electricity without a 
defined contractual term, as well as longer-term contractual commitments, including PPAs.

The Company has completed the evaluation of all revenue streams and determined that the adoption of ASC 606 will not change 
the current timing of revenue recognition for such transactions. Some revenue arrangements, such as energy-related derivatives, 
are excluded from the scope of ASC 606 and, therefore, will be accounted for and disclosed separately from revenues under ASC 
606. The Company has concluded contributions in aid of construction are not in scope for ASC 606 and will continue to be 
accounted for as an offset to property, plant, and equipment.

The new standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company applied the modified 
retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2018. The Company also utilized practical expedients which allowed it to 
apply the standard to open contracts at the date of adoption and to reflect the aggregate effect of all modifications when 
identifying performance obligations and allocating the transaction price for contracts modified before the effective date. Under 
the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated; however, a cumulative-effect 
adjustment to retained earnings at January 1, 2018 is recorded. In addition, quarterly disclosures will include comparative 
information on 2018 financial statement line items under current guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a 
cumulative-effect adjustment.

39

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to 
recognize on the balance sheet a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. ASU 2016-02 also changes the recognition, 
measurement, and presentation of expense associated with leases and provides clarification regarding the identification of certain 
components of contracts that would represent a lease. The accounting required by lessors is relatively unchanged. ASU 2016-02 is 
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and the Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 
2019.

The Company is currently implementing an information technology system along with the related changes to internal controls and 
accounting policies that will support the accounting for leases under ASU 2016-02. In addition, the Company has substantially 
completed a detailed inventory and analysis of its leases. In terms of rental charges and duration of contracts, the most significant 
leases relate to cellular towers, railcars, and a PPA where the Company is the lessee and outdoor lighting and to land where the 
Company is the lessor. The Company is currently analyzing pole attachment agreements and a lease determination has not been 
made at this time. While the Company has not yet determined the ultimate impact, adoption of ASU 2016-02 is expected to have a 
significant impact on the Company's balance sheet.

Other

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee 
Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2016-09). ASU 2016-09 changes the accounting for income taxes and the cash flow 
presentation for share-based payment award transactions effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The new 
guidance requires all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise or vesting of stock compensation to be recognized 
as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. Previously, the Company recognized any excess tax benefits and 
deficiencies related to the exercise and vesting of stock compensation as additional paid-in capital. In addition, the new guidance 
requires excess tax benefits for share-based payments to be included in net cash provided from operating activities rather than net 
cash provided from financing activities on the statement of cash flows. The Company elected to adopt the guidance in 2016 and 
reflect the related adjustments as of January 1, 2016. Prior year's data presented in the financial statements has not been adjusted. 
The Company also elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the results 
of operations, financial position, or cash flows of the Company. See Notes 5 and 8 for disclosures impacted by ASU 2016-09.

On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the 
Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires 
that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs and requires the 
other components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs to be separately presented in the income statement 
outside of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. 
However, all cost components remain eligible for capitalization under FERC regulations. ASU 2017-07 will be applied 
retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension and 
postretirement benefit costs in the income statement. The capitalization of only the service cost component of net periodic 
pension and postretirement benefit costs in assets will be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-07 is effective for periods 
beginning after December 15, 2017. The presentation changes required for net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs 
will result in a decrease in the Company's operating income and an increase in other income for 2016 and 2017 and are expected 
to result in a decrease in operating income and an increase in other income for 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2017-07 
effective January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements.

On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to 
Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12), amending the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements. 
ASU 2017-12 makes more financial and non-financial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting, amends the related 
presentation and disclosure requirements, and simplifies hedge effectiveness assessment requirements. ASU 2017-12 is effective 
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-12 effective 
January 1, 2018 with no material impact on its financial statements. 

Affiliate Transactions

The Company has an agreement with SCS under which the following services are rendered to the Company at direct or allocated 
cost: general and design engineering, operations, purchasing, accounting, finance and treasury, tax, information technology, 
marketing, auditing, insurance and pension administration, human resources, systems and procedures, digital wireless 
communications, and other services with respect to business and operations, construction management, and power pool 
transactions. Costs for these services amounted to $479 million, $460 million, and $438 million during 2017, 2016, and 2015, 
respectively. Cost allocation methodologies used by SCS prior to the repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 
40

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

as amended, were approved by the SEC. Subsequently, additional cost allocation methodologies have been reported to the FERC 
and management believes they are reasonable. The FERC permits services to be rendered at cost by system service companies. 
See Note 7 under "Operating Leases" for information on leases of cellular tower space for the Company's digital wireless 
communications equipment.

The Company has an agreement with Southern Nuclear under which the following nuclear-related services are rendered to the 
Company at cost: general executive and advisory services, general operations, management and technical services, administrative 
services including procurement, accounting, employee relations, systems and procedures services, strategic planning and 
budgeting services, and other services with respect to business and operations. Costs for these services amounted to $248 million, 
$249 million, and $243 million during 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

The Company jointly owns Plant Greene County with Mississippi Power. The Company has an agreement with Mississippi Power 
under which the Company operates Plant Greene County, and Mississippi Power reimburses the Company for its proportionate 
share of non-fuel expenses, which totaled $9 million in 2017, $13 million in 2016, and $11 million in 2015. Mississippi Power 
also reimbursed the Company for any direct fuel purchases delivered from one of the Company's transfer facilities. There were no 
such fuel purchases in 2017 and 2016 and $8 million in 2015. See Note 4 for additional information.

The Company has an agreement with Gulf Power under which the Company made transmission system upgrades to ensure firm 
delivery of energy under a non-affiliate PPA from a combined cycle plant located in Autauga County, Alabama. Under a related 
tariff, the Company received $11 million in 2017, $12 million in 2016, and $14 million in 2015 and expects to recover a total of 
approximately $61 million from 2018 through 2023 from Gulf Power.

In September 2016, Southern Company Gas acquired a 50% equity interest in Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (SNG). 
Prior to completion of the acquisition, SCS, as agent for the Company, had entered into a long-term interstate natural gas 
transportation agreement with SNG. The interstate transportation service provided to the Company by SNG pursuant to this 
agreement is governed by the terms and conditions of SNG's natural gas tariff and is subject to FERC regulation. Transportation 
costs under this agreement were approximately $9 million in 2017 and $2 million for the period subsequent to Southern Company 
Gas' investment in SNG through December 31, 2016.

The Company has agreements with PowerSecure for services related to utility infrastructure construction, distributed energy, and 
energy efficiency projects. Costs for these services amounted to approximately $11 million for 2017 and were immaterial for 
2016.

The Company provides incidental services to and receives such services from other Southern Company subsidiaries which are 
generally minor in duration and amount. Except as described herein, the Company neither provided nor received any material 
services to or from affiliates in 2017, 2016, or 2015.

Also, see Note 4 for information regarding the Company's ownership in a PPA and a gas pipeline ownership agreement with 
SEGCO.

The traditional electric operating companies, including the Company and Southern Power, may jointly enter into various types of 
wholesale energy, natural gas, and certain other contracts, either directly or through SCS as agent. Each participating company 
may be jointly and severally liable for the obligations incurred under these agreements. See Note 7 under "Fuel and Purchased 
Power Agreements" for additional information.

41

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities

The Company is subject to accounting requirements for the effects of rate regulation. Regulatory assets represent probable future 
revenues associated with certain costs that are expected to be recovered from customers through the ratemaking process. 
Regulatory liabilities represent probable future reductions in revenues associated with amounts that are expected to be credited to 
customers through the ratemaking process.

Regulatory assets and (liabilities) reflected in the balance sheets at December 31 relate to:

2017

2016

Note

Retiree benefit plans

Deferred income tax charges

Regulatory clauses

Vacation pay

Loss on reacquired debt

Nuclear outage
Remaining net book value of retired assets

Under/(over) recovered regulatory clause revenues

Other regulatory assets

Fuel-hedging losses

Deferred income tax credits

Other cost of removal obligations

Natural disaster reserve

Asset retirement obligations

Other regulatory liabilities

Total regulatory assets (liabilities), net

(in millions)

$

946

240

142

70

62

56
54

53

51

7
(2,082)
(609)
(38)
(33)
(7)
(1,088)

$

$

$

947

526

—

69

68

70
69

76

50

1
(65)
(684)
(69)
12
(23)
1,047

(i,j)

(a,k,n)

(m)

(c,j)

(b)

(d)
(l)

(d)

(f)

(e,j)

(a,n)

(a)

(h)

(a)

(e,g)

Note: The recovery and amortization periods for these regulatory assets and (liabilities) are as follows:

(a)  Asset retirement and removal assets and liabilities are recorded, deferred income tax assets are recovered, and deferred income tax credits are amortized over 

the related property lives, which may range up to 50 years. Asset retirement and other cost of removal assets and liabilities will be settled and trued up 
following completion of the related activities.

(b)  Recovered over the remaining life of the original issue, which may range up to 50 years.

(c)  Recorded as earned by employees and recovered as paid, generally within one year. This includes both vacation and banked holiday pay.

(d)  Recorded and recovered or amortized as approved or accepted by the Alabama PSC over periods not exceeding 10 years. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory 

Matters" for additional information.

(e)  Fuel-hedging assets and liabilities are recorded over the life of the underlying hedged purchase contracts, which generally do not exceed three and a half 

years. Upon final settlement, actual costs incurred are recovered through the energy cost recovery clause.

(f)  Comprised of components including generation site selection/evaluation costs, PPA capacity (to be recovered over the next 12 months), and other 
miscellaneous assets. Recorded as accepted by the Alabama PSC. Capitalized upon initialization of related construction projects, if applicable.

(g)  Comprised of components including mine reclamation and remediation liabilities and fuel-hedging gains. Recorded as accepted by the Alabama PSC. Mine 

reclamation and remediation liabilities will be settled following completion of the related activities.

(h)  Utilized as storm restoration and potential reliability-related expenses are incurred, as approved by the Alabama PSC.

(i)  Recovered and amortized over the average remaining service period which may range up to 15 years. See Note 2 for additional information.

(j)  Not earning a return as offset in rate base by a corresponding asset or liability.

(k)  Included in the deferred income tax charges are $13 million for 2017 and $16 million for 2016 for the retiree Medicare drug subsidy, which is recovered and 

amortized, as approved by the Alabama PSC, over the average remaining service period which may range up to 15 years.

(l)  Recorded and amortized as approved by the Alabama PSC for a period up to 11 years.

(m) Established per an order from the Alabama PSC issued on February 17, 2017 and will be amortized concurrently with the effective date of the Company's next 

depreciation study. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" for additional information.

(n)  As a result of the Tax Reform Legislation, these accounts include certain deferred income tax assets and liabilities not subject to normalization. The recovery 

and amortization of these amounts will be established consistent with guidance provided by the Alabama PSC. See Note 5 for additional information.

In the event that a portion of the Company's operations is no longer subject to applicable accounting rules for rate regulation, the 
Company would be required to write off to income or reclassify to accumulated OCI related regulatory assets and liabilities that 

42

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

are not specifically recoverable through regulated rates. In addition, the Company would be required to determine if any 
impairment to other assets, including plant, exists and write down the assets, if impaired, to their fair values. All regulatory assets 
and liabilities are to be reflected in rates. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters" for additional information.

Revenues

Wholesale capacity revenues from PPAs are recognized either on a levelized basis over the appropriate contract period or the 
amount billable under the contract terms. Energy and other revenues are recognized as services are provided. Unbilled revenues 
related to retail sales are accrued at the end of each fiscal period. Electric rates for the Company include provisions to adjust 
billings for fluctuations in fuel costs, fuel hedging, the energy component of purchased power costs, and certain other costs. 
Revenues are adjusted for differences between these actual costs and amounts billed in current regulated rates. Under or over 
recovered regulatory clause revenues are recorded in the balance sheets and are recovered or returned to customers through 
adjustments to the billing factors. The Company and the Alabama PSC continuously monitor the under/over recovered balances. 
The Company files for revised rates as required or when management deems appropriate, depending on the rate. See Note 3 under 
"Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate ECR" and "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate CNP Compliance" for additional information.

The Company has a diversified base of customers. No single customer or industry comprises 10% or more of revenues. For all 
periods presented, uncollectible accounts averaged less than 1% of revenues.

Fuel Costs

Fuel costs are expensed as the fuel is used. Fuel expense generally includes fuel transportation costs and the cost of purchased 
emissions allowances as they are used. Fuel expense also includes the amortization of the cost of nuclear fuel.

Income and Other Taxes

The Company uses the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provides deferred income taxes for all 
significant income tax temporary differences. Federal ITCs utilized are deferred and amortized to income over the average life of 
the related property. Taxes that are collected from customers on behalf of governmental agencies to be remitted to these agencies 
are presented net on the statements of income.

The Company recognizes tax positions that are "more likely than not" of being sustained upon examination by the appropriate 
taxing authorities. See Note 5 under "Unrecognized Tax Benefits" for additional information.

Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment is stated at original cost less any regulatory disallowances and impairments. Original cost includes: 
materials; labor; minor items of property; appropriate administrative and general costs; payroll-related costs such as taxes, 
pensions, and other benefits; and the interest capitalized and cost of equity funds used during construction.

The Company's property, plant, and equipment in service consisted of the following at December 31:

Generation

Transmission

Distribution

General

Plant acquisition adjustment

Total plant in service

2017

2016

(in millions)

$

14,213

$

13,551

4,119

7,034

1,948

12

3,921

6,707

1,840

12

$

27,326

$

26,031

The cost of replacements of property, exclusive of minor items of property, is capitalized. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and 
replacement of minor items of property is charged to other operations and maintenance expenses as incurred or performed with 
the exception of nuclear refueling costs, which are recorded in accordance with specific Alabama PSC orders.

Nuclear Outage Accounting Order

In accordance with an Alabama PSC order, nuclear outage operations and maintenance expenses for the two units at Plant Farley 
are deferred to a regulatory asset when the charges actually occur and are then amortized over a subsequent 18-month period with 

43

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

the fall outage costs amortization beginning in January of the following year and the spring outage costs amortization beginning 
in July of the same year.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation of the original cost of utility plant in service is provided primarily by using composite straight-line rates, which 
approximated 2.9% in 2017, 3% in 2016, and 2.9% in 2015. Depreciation studies are conducted periodically to update the 
composite rates and the information is provided to the Alabama PSC and approved by the FERC. When property subject to 
composite depreciation is retired or otherwise disposed of in the normal course of business, its original cost, together with the cost 
of removal, less salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation. For other property dispositions, the applicable cost and 
accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet accounts, and a gain or loss is recognized. Minor items of property 
included in the original cost of the plant are retired when the related property unit is retired.

In 2016, the Company submitted an updated depreciation study to the FERC and received authorization to use the recommended 
rates beginning January 2017. The study was also provided to the Alabama PSC.

Asset Retirement Obligations and Other Costs of Removal

AROs are computed as the present value of the estimated ultimate costs for an asset's future retirement and are recorded in the 
period in which the liability is incurred. The costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the 
asset's useful life. In the absence of quoted market prices, AROs are estimated using present value techniques in which estimates 
of future cash outlays associated with the asset retirements are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Estimates of the 
timing and amounts of future cash outlays are based on projections of when and how the assets will be retired and the cost of 
future removal activities. The Company has received accounting guidance from the Alabama PSC allowing the continued accrual 
of other future retirement costs for long-lived assets that the Company does not have a legal obligation to retire. Accordingly, the 
accumulated removal costs for these obligations are reflected in the balance sheets as a regulatory liability.

The liability for AROs primarily relates to the decommissioning of the Company's nuclear facility, Plant Farley, and facilities that 
are subject to the Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities final rule published by the EPA in 2015 (CCR 
Rule), principally ash ponds. In addition, the Company has retirement obligations related to various landfill sites, underground 
storage tanks, asbestos removal related to ongoing repair and maintenance, disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls in certain 
transformers, and disposal of sulfur hexafluoride gas in certain substation breakers. The Company also has identified retirement 
obligations related to certain transmission and distribution facilities, asbestos containing material within long-term assets not 
subject to ongoing repair and maintenance activities, and certain wireless communication towers. However, liabilities for the 
removal of these assets have not been recorded because the settlement timing for the retirement obligations related to these assets 
is indeterminable and, therefore, the fair value of the retirement obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. A liability for these 
AROs will be recognized when sufficient information becomes available to support a reasonable estimation of the ARO. The 
Company will continue to recognize in the statements of income allowed removal costs in accordance with its regulatory 
treatment. Any differences between costs recognized in accordance with accounting standards related to asset retirement and 
environmental obligations and those reflected in rates are recognized as either a regulatory asset or liability, as ordered by the 
Alabama PSC, and are reflected in the balance sheets. See "Nuclear Decommissioning" herein for additional information on 
amounts included in rates.

Details of the AROs included in the balance sheets are as follows:

Balance at beginning of year

Liabilities incurred

Liabilities settled

Accretion
Cash flow revisions

Balance at end of year

2017

2016

(in millions)

$

1,533

$

1,448

—
(26)
77
125

5
(25)
73

32

$

1,709

$

1,533

The increase in liabilities incurred and cash flow revisions in 2017 is primarily due to updated cost estimates related to the closure 
of ash ponds and landfills. The increase in 2016 is primarily related to changes in ash pond closure strategy.

44

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The cost estimates for AROs related to the CCR Rule are based on information as of December 31, 2017 using various 
assumptions related to closure and post-closure costs, timing of future cash outlays, inflation and discount rates, and the potential 
methods for complying with the CCR Rule requirements for closure in place. As further analysis is performed and closure details 
are developed, the Company will continue to periodically update these cost estimates as necessary.

Nuclear Decommissioning

The NRC requires licensees of commercial nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of funds 
for future decommissioning. The Company has external trust funds (Funds) to comply with the NRC's regulations. Use of the 
Funds is restricted to nuclear decommissioning activities. The Funds are managed and invested in accordance with applicable 
requirements of various regulatory bodies, including the NRC, the FERC, and the Alabama PSC, as well as the IRS. While the 
Company is allowed to prescribe an overall investment policy to the Funds' managers, the Company and its affiliates are not 
allowed to engage in the day-to-day management of the Funds or to mandate individual investment decisions. Day-to-day 
management of the investments in the Funds is delegated to unrelated third party managers with oversight by the management of 
the Company. The Funds' managers are authorized, within certain investment guidelines, to actively buy and sell securities at their 
own discretion in order to maximize the return on the Funds' investments. The Funds are invested in a tax-efficient manner in a 
diversified mix of equity and fixed income securities and are reported as trading securities.

The Company records the investment securities held in the Funds at fair value, as disclosed in Note 10, as management believes 
that fair value best represents the nature of the Funds. Gains and losses, whether realized or unrealized, are recorded in the 
regulatory liability for AROs in the balance sheets and are not included in net income or OCI. Fair value adjustments and realized 
gains and losses are determined on a specific identification basis.

At December 31, 2017, investment securities in the Funds totaled $902 million, consisting of equity securities of $644 million, 
debt securities of $223 million, and $35 million of other securities. At December 31, 2016, investment securities in the Funds 
totaled $790 million, consisting of equity securities of $552 million, debt securities of $208 million, and $30 million of other 
securities. These amounts exclude receivables related to investment income and pending investment sales and payables related to 
pending investment purchases.

Sales of the securities held in the Funds resulted in cash proceeds of $237 million, $351 million, and $438 million in 2017, 2016, 
and 2015, respectively, all of which were reinvested. For 2017, fair value increases, including reinvested interest and dividends 
and excluding the Funds' expenses, were $125 million, which included $98 million related to unrealized gains on securities held 
in the Funds at December 31, 2017. For 2016, fair value increases, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the 
Funds' expenses, were $76 million, which included $34 million related to unrealized gains on securities held in the Funds at 
December 31, 2016. For 2015, fair value increases, including reinvested interest and dividends and excluding the Funds' 
expenses, were $8 million, which included $57 million related to unrealized losses on securities held in the Funds at 
December 31, 2015. While the investment securities held in the Funds are reported as trading securities, the Funds continue to be 
managed with a long-term focus. Accordingly, all purchases and sales within the Funds are presented separately in the statements 
of cash flows as investing cash flows, consistent with the nature of the securities and purpose for which the securities were 
acquired.

Amounts previously recorded in internal reserves are being transferred into the Funds through 2040 as approved by the Alabama 
PSC. The NRC's minimum external funding requirements are based on a generic estimate of the cost to decommission only the 
radioactive portions of a nuclear unit based on the size and type of reactor. The Company has filed a plan with the NRC designed 
to ensure that, over time, the deposits and earnings of the Funds will provide the minimum funding amounts prescribed by the 
NRC.

At December 31, the accumulated provisions for decommissioning were as follows:

External trust funds

Internal reserves
Total

2017

2016

(in millions)

$

$

902

18

920

$

$

790

19
809

45

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Site study cost is the estimate to decommission a facility as of the site study year. The estimated costs of decommissioning as of 
December 31, 2017 based on the most current study performed in 2013 for Plant Farley are as follows:

Decommissioning periods:

Beginning year

Completion year

Site study costs:

Radiated structures

Non-radiated structures

Total site study costs

2037

2076

(in millions)

$

$

1,362

80

1,442

The decommissioning cost estimates are based on prompt dismantlement and removal of the plant from service. The actual 
decommissioning costs may vary from the above estimates because of changes in the assumed date of decommissioning, changes 
in NRC requirements, or changes in the assumptions used in making these estimates.

For ratemaking purposes, the Company's decommissioning costs are based on the site study. Significant assumptions used to 
determine these costs for ratemaking were an inflation rate of 4.5% and a trust earnings rate of 7.0%. The next site study is 
expected to be completed in 2018.

Amounts previously contributed to the Funds are currently projected to be adequate to meet the decommissioning obligations. 
The Company will continue to provide site-specific estimates of the decommissioning costs and related projections of funds in the 
external trust to the Alabama PSC and, if necessary, would seek the Alabama PSC's approval to address any changes in a manner 
consistent with NRC and other applicable requirements.

Allowance for Funds Used During Construction

The Company records AFUDC, which represents the estimated debt and equity costs of capital funds that are necessary to finance 
the construction of new regulated facilities. While cash is not realized currently, AFUDC increases the revenue requirement and is 
recovered over the service life of the plant through a higher rate base and higher depreciation. The equity component of AFUDC 
is not included in calculating taxable income. All current construction costs are included in retail rates. The AFUDC composite 
rate as of December 31 was 8.3% in 2017, 8.4% in 2016, and 8.7% in 2015. AFUDC, net of income taxes, as a percentage of net 
income after dividends on preferred and preference stock was 5.7% in 2017, 4.2% in 2016, and 9.3% in 2015.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying 
value of such assets may not be recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based on either a 
specific regulatory disallowance or an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets, as compared with the 
carrying value of the assets. If an impairment has occurred, the amount of the impairment recognized is determined by either the 
amount of regulatory disallowance or by estimating the fair value of the assets and recording a loss if the carrying value is greater 
than the fair value. For assets identified as held for sale, the carrying value is compared to the estimated fair value less the cost to 
sell in order to determine if an impairment loss is required. Until the assets are disposed of, their estimated fair value is re-
evaluated when circumstances or events change.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the financial statements, temporary cash investments are considered cash equivalents. Temporary cash 
investments are securities with original maturities of 90 days or less.

Materials and Supplies

Generally, materials and supplies include the average cost of transmission, distribution, and generating plant materials. Materials 
are charged to inventory when purchased and then expensed or capitalized to plant, as appropriate, at weighted average cost when 
installed.

46

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Fuel Inventory

Fuel inventory includes the average cost of coal, natural gas, oil, transportation, and emissions allowances. Fuel is recorded to 
inventory when purchased and then expensed, at weighted average cost, as used and recovered by the Company through energy 
cost recovery rates approved by the Alabama PSC. Emissions allowances granted by the EPA are included in inventory at zero 
cost.

Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivative financial instruments to limit exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, the prices of certain fuel 
purchases, and electricity purchases and sales. All derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on 
the balance sheets (included in "Other") and are measured at fair value. See Note 10 for additional information regarding fair 
value. Substantially all of the Company's bulk energy purchases and sales contracts that meet the definition of a derivative are 
excluded from fair value accounting requirements because they qualify for the "normal" scope exception, and are accounted for 
under the accrual method. Derivative contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges of anticipated transactions or are recoverable 
through the Alabama PSC-approved fuel-hedging program result in the deferral of related gains and losses in OCI or regulatory 
assets and liabilities, respectively, until the hedged transactions occur. Any ineffectiveness arising from cash flow hedges is 
recognized currently in net income. Other derivative contracts that qualify as fair value hedges are marked to market through 
current period income and are recorded on a net basis in the statements of income. Cash flows from derivatives are classified on 
the statement of cash flows in the same category as the hedged item. See Note 11 for additional information regarding derivatives.

The Company offsets fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty 
under a netting arrangement. Additionally, the Company had no outstanding collateral repayment obligations or rights to reclaim 
collateral arising from derivative instruments recognized at December 31, 2017.

The Company is exposed to potential losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The 
Company has established controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the 
Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk.

Comprehensive Income

The objective of comprehensive income is to report a measure of all changes in common stock equity of an enterprise that result 
from transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with owners. Comprehensive income consists 
of net income, changes in the fair value of qualifying cash flow hedges, and reclassifications for amounts included in net income.

Variable Interest Entities

The primary beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE when it has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE 
that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits 
from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

The Company has established a wholly-owned trust to issue preferred securities. See Note 6 under "Long-Term Debt Payable to 
an Affiliated Trust" for additional information. However, the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary of the trust. 
Therefore, the investment in the trust is reflected as other investments, and the related loan from the trust is reflected as long-term 
debt in the balance sheets.

2. RETIREMENT BENEFITS

The Company has a defined benefit, trusteed, pension plan covering substantially all employees. This qualified pension plan is 
funded in accordance with requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). No 
contributions to the qualified pension plan were made for the year ended December 31, 2017 and no mandatory contributions to 
the qualified pension plan are anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2018. The Company also provides certain defined 
benefit pension plans for a selected group of management and highly compensated employees. Benefits under these non-qualified 
pension plans are funded on a cash basis. In addition, the Company provides certain medical care and life insurance benefits for 
retired employees through other postretirement benefit plans. The Company funds its other postretirement trusts to the extent 
required by the Alabama PSC and the FERC. For the year ending December 31, 2018, no other postretirement trusts contributions 
are expected.

47

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Actuarial Assumptions

The weighted average rates assumed in the actuarial calculations used to determine both the net periodic costs for the pension and 
other postretirement benefit plans for the following year and the benefit obligations as of the measurement date are presented 
below.

Assumptions used to determine net periodic costs:

2017

2016

2015

Pension plans

Discount rate – benefit obligations

Discount rate – interest costs

Discount rate – service costs

Expected long-term return on plan assets

Annual salary increase

Other postretirement benefit plans

Discount rate – benefit obligations

Discount rate – interest costs
Discount rate – service costs

Expected long-term return on plan assets

Annual salary increase

4.44%

3.76

4.85

7.95

4.46

4.27%

3.58
4.70

6.83

4.46

4.67%

3.90

5.07

8.20

4.46

4.51%

3.69
4.96

6.83

4.46

4.18%

4.18

4.49

8.20

3.59

4.04%

4.04
4.40

7.17

3.59

Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:

2017

2016

Pension plans
Discount rate

Annual salary increase

Other postretirement benefit plans

Discount rate

Annual salary increase

3.81%

4.46

3.71%

4.46

4.44%

4.46

4.27%

4.46

The Company estimates the expected rate of return on pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets using a financial 
model to project the expected return on each current investment portfolio. The analysis projects an expected rate of return on each 
of eight different asset classes in order to arrive at the expected return on the entire portfolio relying on each trust's target asset 
allocation and reasonable capital market assumptions. The financial model is based on four key inputs: anticipated returns by 
asset class (based in part on historical returns), each trust's target asset allocation, an anticipated inflation rate, and the projected 
impact of a periodic rebalancing of each trust's portfolio.

An additional assumption used in measuring the accumulated other postretirement benefit obligations (APBO) was a weighted 
average medical care cost trend rate. The weighted average medical care cost trend rates used in measuring the APBO as of 
December 31, 2017 were as follows:

Pre-65

Post-65 medical

Post-65 prescription

Initial Cost
Trend Rate

6.50%

5.00

10.00

Ultimate
Cost Trend
Rate

4.50%

4.50

4.50

Year That
Ultimate
Rate is
Reached
2026

2026

2026

48

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

An annual increase or decrease in the assumed medical care cost trend rate of 1% would affect the APBO and the service and 
interest cost components at December 31, 2017 as follows:

Benefit obligation

Service and interest costs

Pension Plans

1 Percent
Increase

1 Percent
Decrease

$

(in millions)

$

30

1

26

1

The total accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plans was $2.7 billion at December 31, 2017 and $2.4 billion at 
December 31, 2016. Changes in the projected benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended 
December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

Change in benefit obligation

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

Service cost

Interest cost

Benefits paid

Actuarial (gain) loss

Balance at end of year
Change in plan assets

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

Actual return (loss) on plan assets

Employer contributions

Benefits paid

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

Accrued liability

2017

2016

(in millions)

$

2,663

$

2,506

63

98
(120)
294

2,998

2,517

427

12
(120)
2,836
(162)

$

57

95

(109)

114

2,663

2,279

206

141

(109)

2,517

(146)

$

At December 31, 2017, the projected benefit obligations for the qualified and non-qualified pension plans were $2.9 billion and 
$126 million, respectively. All pension plan assets are related to the qualified pension plan.

Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the Company's pension plans consist of the 
following:

Other regulatory assets, deferred

Other current liabilities

Employee benefit obligations

2017

2016

(in millions)

$

$

890
(12)
(150)

870

(12)

(134)

Presented below are the amounts included in regulatory assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the defined benefit 
pension plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost along with the estimated amortization of such amounts 
for 2018.

49

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Prior service cost

Net (gain) loss

Regulatory assets

2017

2016
(in millions)

$

$

8

882

890

$

$

10

860

870

Estimated
Amortization
in 2018

$

1

54

The changes in the balance of regulatory assets related to the defined benefit pension plans for the years ended December 31, 
2017 and 2016 are presented in the following table:

Regulatory assets:

Beginning balance

Net (gain) loss

Change in prior service costs

Reclassification adjustments:

Amortization of prior service costs

Amortization of net gain (loss)

Total reclassification adjustments

Total change

Ending balance

Components of net periodic pension cost were as follows:

Service cost

Interest cost

Expected return on plan assets

Recognized net (gain) loss

Net amortization

Net periodic pension cost

2017

2016

(in millions)

$

$

$

$

870

64

—

(2)
(42)
(44)
20

890

2016
(in millions)

57

95
(184)
40

3

11

$

$

$

$

822

84

7

(3)

(40)

(43)

48

870

59

106

(178)

55

6

48

2015

2017

63

98
(196)
42

2

9

$

$

Net periodic pension cost is the sum of service cost, interest cost, and other costs netted against the expected return on plan assets. 
The expected return on plan assets is determined by multiplying the expected rate of return on plan assets and the market-related 
value of plan assets. In determining the market-related value of plan assets, the Company has elected to amortize changes in the 
market value of all plan assets over five years rather than recognize the changes immediately. As a result, the accounting value of 
plan assets that is used to calculate the expected return on plan assets differs from the current fair value of the plan assets.

50

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Future benefit payments reflect expected future service and are estimated based on assumptions used to measure the projected 
benefit obligation for the pension plans. At December 31, 2017, estimated benefit payments were as follows:

Benefit
Payments
(in millions)

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023 to 2027

$

Other Postretirement Benefits

Changes in the APBO and in the fair value of plan assets during the plan years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as 
follows:

Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Benefits paid
Actuarial (gain) loss
Retiree drug subsidy
Balance at end of year
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Actual return (loss) on plan assets
Employer contributions
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Accrued liability

2017

2016

(in millions)

$

$

501
6
17
(29)
20
2
517

367
60
6
(27)
406
(111)

$

$

129

134

139

143

148

807

505
5
18
(28)
(1)
2
501

363
23
7
(26)
367
(134)

Amounts recognized in the balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the Company's other postretirement benefit 
plans consist of the following:

Other regulatory assets, deferred
Other regulatory liabilities, deferred
Employee benefit obligations

2017

2016

$

(in millions)
$

63
(7)
(111)

86
(10)
(134)

51

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Presented below are the amounts included in net regulatory assets (liabilities) at December 31, 2017 and 2016 related to the other 
postretirement benefit plans that had not yet been recognized in net periodic other postretirement benefit cost along with the 
estimated amortization of such amounts for 2018.

Prior service cost

Net (gain) loss

Net regulatory assets

2017

2016
(in millions)

$

$

11

45

56

$

$

15

61

76

Estimated
Amortization
in 2018

$

4

1

The changes in the balance of net regulatory assets (liabilities) related to the other postretirement benefit plans for the plan years 
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented in the following table:

Net regulatory assets (liabilities):

Beginning balance

Net (gain) loss

Reclassification adjustments:

Amortization of prior service costs

Amortization of net gain (loss)

Total reclassification adjustments

Total change

Ending balance

Components of the other postretirement benefit plans' net periodic cost were as follows:

Service cost

Interest cost

Expected return on plan assets

Net amortization

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost

2017

6

17
(25)
5

3

$

$

2017

2016

(in millions)

$

$

$

$

76
(15)

(4)
(1)
(5)
(20)
56

2016
(in millions)

5

18
(25)
6

4

$

$

$

$

82

—

(4)

(2)

(6)

(6)

76

6

20

(26)

5

5

2015

Future benefit payments, including prescription drug benefits, reflect expected future service and are estimated based on 
assumptions used to measure the APBO for the other postretirement benefit plans. Estimated benefit payments are reduced by 
drug subsidy receipts expected as a result of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 as 
follows:

2018

2019
2020

2021

2022

2023 to 2027

Benefit
Payments

Subsidy
Receipts
(in millions)

$

31

32
33

34

35

173

(2)
(2)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(14)

Total

$

29

30
30

31

32

159

$

52

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Benefit Plan Assets

Pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets are managed and invested in accordance with all applicable 
requirements, including ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company's investment policies for both 
the pension plan and the other postretirement benefit plans cover a diversified mix of assets, including equity and fixed income 
securities, real estate, and private equity. Derivative instruments are used primarily to gain efficient exposure to the various asset 
classes and as hedging tools. The Company minimizes the risk of large losses primarily through diversification but also monitors 
and manages other aspects of risk.

The composition of the Company's pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, 
along with the targeted mix of assets for each plan, is presented below:

Target

2017

2016

Pension plan assets:

Domestic equity

International equity

Fixed income

Special situations
Real estate investments

Private equity

Total
Other postretirement benefit plan assets:

Domestic equity

International equity

Domestic fixed income

Special situations

Real estate investments

Private equity

Total

26%

25

23

3
14

9

100%

42%

22

28

1

4

3

31%

25

24

1
13

6

100%

44%

22

28

—

4

2

29%

22

29

2
13

5

100%

44%

20

29

1

4

2

100%

100%

100%

The investment strategy for plan assets related to the Company's qualified pension plan is to be broadly diversified across major 
asset classes. The asset allocation is established after consideration of various factors that affect the assets and liabilities of the 
pension plan including, but not limited to, historical and expected returns and interest rates, volatility, correlations of asset 
classes, the current level of assets and liabilities, and the assumed growth in assets and liabilities. Because a significant portion of 
the liability of the pension plan is long-term in nature, the assets are invested consistent with long-term investment expectations 
for return and risk. To manage the actual asset class exposures relative to the target asset allocation, the Company employs a 
formal rebalancing program. As additional risk management, external investment managers and service providers are subject to 
written guidelines to ensure appropriate and prudent investment practices. Management believes the portfolio is well-diversified 
with no significant concentrations of risk.

Investment Strategies

Detailed below is a description of the investment strategies for each major asset category for the pension and other postretirement 
benefit plans disclosed above:

•  Domestic equity. A mix of large and small capitalization stocks with generally an equal distribution of value and growth 

• 

attributes, managed both actively and through passive index approaches.
International equity. A mix of growth stocks and value stocks with both developed and emerging market exposure, 
managed both actively and through passive index approaches.

•  Fixed income. A mix of domestic and international bonds.
•  Trust-owned life insurance (TOLI). Investments of the Company's taxable trusts aimed at minimizing the impact of 

• 

taxes on the portfolio.
Special situations. Investments in opportunistic strategies with the objective of diversifying and enhancing returns and 
exploiting short-term inefficiencies as well as investments in promising new strategies of a longer-term nature.

53

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

•  Real estate investments. Investments in traditional private market, equity-oriented investments in real properties 

(indirectly through pooled funds or partnerships) and in publicly traded real estate securities.

•  Private equity. Investments in private partnerships that invest in private or public securities typically through privately-

negotiated and/or structured transactions, including leveraged buyouts, venture capital, and distressed debt.

Benefit Plan Asset Fair Values

Following are the fair value measurements for the pension plan and the other postretirement benefit plan assets as of 
December 31, 2017 and 2016. The fair values presented are prepared in accordance with GAAP. For purposes of determining the 
fair value of the pension plan and other postretirement benefit plan assets and the appropriate level designation, management 
relies on information provided by the plan's trustee. This information is reviewed and evaluated by management with changes 
made to the trustee information as appropriate.

Valuation methods of the primary fair value measurements disclosed in the following tables are as follows:

•  Domestic and international equity. Investments in equity securities such as common stocks, American depositary 

receipts, and real estate investment trusts that trade on a public exchange are classified as Level 1 investments and are 
valued at the closing price in the active market. Equity investments with unpublished prices (i.e. pooled funds) are 
valued as Level 2, when the underlying holdings used to value the investment are comprised of Level 1 or Level 2 equity 
securities. 

•  Fixed income. Investments in fixed income securities are generally classified as Level 2 investments and are valued 

based on prices reported in the market place. Additionally, the value of fixed income securities takes into consideration 
certain items such as broker quotes, spreads, yield curves, interest rates, and discount rates that apply to the term of a 
specific instrument. 

•  TOLI. Investments in TOLI policies are classified as Level 2 investments and are valued based on the underlying 

investments held in the policy's separate account. The underlying assets are equity and fixed income pooled funds that 
are comprised of Level 1 and Level 2 securities.

•  Real estate investments, private equity, and special situations investments. Investments in real estate, private equity, 
and special situations are generally classified as Net Asset Value as a Practical Expedient, since the underlying assets 
typically do not have publicly available observable inputs. The fund manager values the assets using various inputs and 
techniques depending on the nature of the underlying investments. Techniques may include purchase multiples for 
comparable transactions, comparable public company trading multiples, discounted cash flow analysis, prevailing 
market capitalization rates, recent sales of comparable investments, and independent third-party appraisals. The fair 
value of partnerships is determined by aggregating the value of the underlying assets less liabilities.

54

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The fair values of pension plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair value measurements 
exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales, and payables related to pending investment 
purchases.

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices
in Active 
Markets 
for Identical 
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

(in millions)

Net Asset
Value as a
Practical
Expedient
(NAV)

Total

$

$

572

370

$

276

333

— $

—

— $

—

—

—

—

—

51

111

—

—

200

2

286

155

3

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

$

1,104

$

1,255

$

— $

—

—

—

—

—

283

43

159

485

848

703

200

2

286

155

54

394

43

159

$

2,844

As of December 31, 2017:

Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency
bonds

Mortgage- and asset-backed securities

Corporate bonds

Pooled funds

Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments

Special situations

Private equity

Total

(*)  Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

55

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices
in Active 
Markets 
for Identical 
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

(in millions)

Net Asset
Value as a
Practical
Expedient
(NAV)

Total

$

$

477

292

$

220

264

— $

—

— $

—

—

—

—
—

236

74

—

—

140

3

235
124

1

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—

$

1,079

$

987

$

— $

—

—

—
—

—

274

43

130

447

697

556

140

3

235
124

237

348

43

130

$

2,513

As of December 31, 2016:

Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency
bonds

Mortgage- and asset-backed securities

Corporate bonds
Pooled funds

Cash equivalents and other

Real estate investments

Special situations

Private equity

Total

(*)  Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

56

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The fair values of other postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below. These fair 
value measurements exclude cash, receivables related to investment income, pending investments sales, and payables related to 
pending investment purchases.

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

(in millions)

Net Asset
Value as a
Practical
Expedient
(NAV)

Total

$

$

52

16

—

—

—

2

—

5

—

—

75

$

12

14

11

12

7

—

253

—

—

—

$

— $

—

— $

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

12

2

7

64

30

11

12

7

2

253

17

2

7

$

309

$

— $

21

$

405

As of December 31, 2017:

Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency
bonds

Corporate bonds

Pooled funds

Cash equivalents and other

Trust-owned life insurance

Real estate investments

Special situations

Private equity

Total

(*)  Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

57

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

(in millions)

Net Asset
Value as a
Practical
Expedient
(NAV)

Total

$

$

51

13

—

—

—
14

—

4

—

—

82

$

10

12

7

10

5
—

220

—

—

—

$

— $

—

— $

—

—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

—

12

2

6

61

25

7

10

5
14

220

16

2

6

$

264

$

— $

20

$

366

As of December 31, 2016:

Assets:

Domestic equity(*)
International equity(*)
Fixed income:

U.S. Treasury, government, and agency
bonds

Corporate bonds

Pooled funds
Cash equivalents and other

Trust-owned life insurance

Real estate investments

Special situations

Private equity

Total

(*)  Level 1 securities consist of actively traded stocks while Level 2 securities consist of pooled funds.

Employee Savings Plan

The Company also sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering substantially all employees. The Company matches a 
portion of the first 6% of employee base salary contributions. The maximum Company match is 5.1% of an employee's base 
salary. Total matching contributions made to the plan for 2017, 2016, and 2015 were $23 million, $23 million, and $22 million, 
respectively.

3. CONTINGENCIES AND REGULATORY MATTERS

General Litigation Matters

The Company is subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the Company's 
business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment, such as 
regulation of air emissions and water discharges. Litigation over environmental issues and claims of various types, including 
property damage, personal injury, common law nuisance, and citizen enforcement of environmental requirements such as 
standards for air, water, land, and protection of other natural resources, has occurred throughout the U.S. This litigation has 
included claims for damages alleged to have been caused by CO2 and other emissions, CCR, and alleged exposure to hazardous 
materials, and/or requests for injunctive relief in connection with such matters. The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential 
litigation against the Company cannot be predicted at this time; however, for current proceedings not specifically reported herein, 
management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material 
effect on the Company's financial statements.

Environmental Matters

Environmental Remediation

The Company must comply with environmental laws and regulations that cover the handling and disposal of waste and releases 
of hazardous substances. Under these various laws and regulations, the Company could incur substantial costs to clean up 
affected sites. The Company conducts studies to determine the extent of any required cleanup and has recognized in its financial 
statements the estimated costs to clean up known sites. Amounts for cleanup and ongoing monitoring costs were not material for 
any year presented. The Company may be liable for some or all required cleanup costs for additional sites that may require 

58

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

environmental remediation. The Company recognizes a liability for environmental remediation costs only when it determines a 
loss is probable and reasonably estimable.

Nuclear Fuel Disposal Costs

Acting through the DOE and pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the U.S. government entered into a contract with 
the Company that requires the DOE to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high level radioactive waste generated at Plant Farley 
beginning no later than January 31, 1998. The DOE has yet to commence the performance of its contractual and statutory 
obligation to dispose of spent nuclear fuel. Consequently, the Company has pursued and continues to pursue legal remedies 
against the U.S. government for its partial breach of contract.

In 2014, the Court of Federal Claims entered a judgment in favor of the Company in its spent nuclear fuel lawsuit seeking 
damages for the period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2010. In 2015, the Company recovered approximately $26 
million, which was applied to reduce the cost of service for the benefit of customers. 

In 2014, the Company filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government for the costs of continuing to store spent nuclear fuel at Plant 
Farley for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013. The damage period was subsequently extended to 
December 31, 2014. On October 10, 2017, the Company filed an additional lawsuit against the U.S. government in the Court of 
Federal Claims for the costs of continuing to store spent nuclear fuel at Plant Farley for the period from January 1, 2015 through 
December 31, 2017. Damages will continue to accumulate until the issue is resolved or storage is provided. No amounts have 
been recognized in the financial statements as of December 31, 2017 for any potential recoveries from the pending lawsuits. The 
final outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time. However, the Company expects to credit any recovery back for 
the benefit of customers in accordance with direction from the Alabama PSC and, therefore, no material impact on the Company's 
net income is expected.

At Plant Farley, on-site dry spent fuel storage facilities are operational and can be expanded to accommodate spent fuel through 
the expected life of the plant.

FERC Matters

The Company has authority from the FERC to sell electricity at market-based rates. Since 2008, that authority, for certain 
balancing authority areas, has been conditioned on compliance with the requirements of an energy auction, which the FERC 
found to be tailored mitigation that addresses potential market power concerns. In accordance with FERC regulations governing 
such authority, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed a triennial market 
power analysis in 2014, which included continued reliance on the energy auction as tailored mitigation. In 2015, the FERC issued 
an order finding that the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's existing 
tailored mitigation may not effectively mitigate the potential to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional 
electric operating companies and in some adjacent areas. The FERC directed the traditional electric operating companies 
(including the Company) and Southern Power to show why market-based rate authority should not be revoked in these areas or to 
provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. The traditional electric operating companies (including the 
Company) and Southern Power filed a request for rehearing and filed their response with the FERC in 2015.

In December 2016, the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power filed an 
amendment to their market-based rate tariff that proposed certain changes to the energy auction, as well as several non-tariff 
changes. On February 2, 2017, the FERC issued an order accepting all such changes subject to an additional condition of cost-
based price caps for certain sales outside of the energy auction, finding that all of these changes would provide adequate 
alternative mitigation for the traditional electric operating companies' (including the Company's) and Southern Power's potential 
to exert market power in certain areas served by the traditional electric operating companies (including the Company) and in 
some adjacent areas. On May 17, 2017, the FERC accepted the traditional electric operating companies' (including the 
Company's) and Southern Power's compliance filing accepting the terms of the order. While the FERC's February 2, 2017 order 
references the market power proceeding discussed above, it remains a separate, ongoing matter.

59

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

On October 25, 2017, the FERC issued an order in response to the traditional electric operating companies' (including the 
Company's) and Southern Power's June 29, 2017 triennial updated market power analysis. The FERC directed the traditional 
electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power to show cause within 60 days why market-based rate 
authority should not be revoked in certain areas adjacent to the area presently under mitigation in accordance with the February 2, 
2017 order or to provide a mitigation plan to further address market power concerns. On November 10, 2017, the traditional 
electric operating companies (including the Company) and Southern Power responded to the FERC and proposed to resolve 
matters by applying the alternative mitigation authorized by the February 2, 2017 order to the adjacent areas made the subject of 
the October 25, 2017 order.

The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.

Retail Regulatory Matters

Rate RSE

The Alabama PSC has adopted Rate RSE that provides for periodic annual adjustments based upon the Company's projected 
weighted cost of equity (WCE) compared to an allowable range. Rate RSE adjustments are based on forward-looking information 
for the applicable upcoming calendar year. Retail rates remain unchanged when the WCE ranges between 5.75% and 6.21% with 
an adjusting point of 5.98% and eligibility for a performance-based adder of seven basis points, or 0.07%, to the WCE adjusting 
point if the Company (i) has an "A" credit rating equivalent with at least one of the recognized rating agencies or (ii) is in the top 
one-third of a designated customer value benchmark survey. Rate RSE adjustments for any two-year period, when averaged 
together, cannot exceed 4.0% and any annual adjustment is limited to 5.0%. If the Company's actual retail return is above the 
allowed WCE range, the excess will be refunded to customers unless otherwise directed by the Alabama PSC; however, there is 
no provision for additional customer billings should the actual retail return fall below the WCE range.

At December 31, 2016, the Company's retail return exceeded the allowed WCE range which resulted in the Company establishing 
a $73 million Rate RSE refund liability. In accordance with an Alabama PSC order issued on February 14, 2017, the Company 
applied the full amount of the refund to reduce the under recovered balance of Rate CNP PPA as discussed further below.

Effective in January 2017, Rate RSE increased 4.48%, or $245 million annually. At December 31, 2017, the Company's actual 
retail return was within the allowed WCE range. On December 1, 2017, the Company made its required annual Rate RSE 
submission to the Alabama PSC of projected data for calendar year 2018. Projected earnings were within the specified range; 
therefore, retail rates under Rate RSE remained unchanged for 2018. 

In conjunction with Rate RSE, the Company has an established retail tariff that provides for an adjustment to customer billings to 
recognize the impact of a change in the statutory income tax rate. As a result of Tax Reform Legislation, the application of this 
tariff would reduce annual retail revenue by approximately $250 million over the remainder of 2018. The ultimate outcome of 
this matter cannot be determined at this time.

Rate CNP PPA

The Company's retail rates, approved by the Alabama PSC, provide for adjustments under Rate CNP to recognize the placing of 
new generating facilities into retail service. The Company may also recover retail costs associated with certificated PPAs under 
Rate CNP PPA. On March 7, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that the Company leave in effect the current Rate 
CNP PPA factor for billings for the period April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018. No adjustment to Rate CNP PPA is expected in 
2018. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had an under recovered Rate CNP PPA balance of $12 million and $142 
million, respectively, which is included in deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues in the balance sheet. 

In accordance with an accounting order issued on February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, the Company eliminated the under 
recovered balance in Rate CNP PPA at December 31, 2016, which totaled approximately $142 million. As discussed herein under 
"Rate RSE," the Company utilized the full amount of its $73 million Rate RSE refund liability to reduce the amount of the Rate 
CNP PPA under recovery and reclassified the remaining $69 million to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new 
regulatory asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of the Company's next depreciation study, 
which is expected to occur within the next two to four years. The Company's current depreciation study became effective January 
1, 2017.

Rate CNP Compliance

Rate CNP Compliance allows for the recovery of the Company's retail costs associated with laws, regulations, and other such 
mandates directed at the utility industry involving the environment, security, reliability, safety, sustainability, or similar 
considerations impacting the Company's facilities or operations. Rate CNP Compliance is based on forward-looking information 

60

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

and provides for the recovery of these costs pursuant to a factor that is calculated annually. Compliance costs to be recovered 
include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and a return on certain invested capital. Revenues for Rate CNP 
Compliance, as recorded on the financial statements, are adjusted for differences in actual recoverable costs and amounts billed in 
current regulated rates. Accordingly, changes in the billing factor will have no significant effect on the Company's revenues or net 
income, but will affect annual cash flow. Changes in Rate CNP Compliance-related operations and maintenance expenses and 
depreciation generally will have no effect on net income.

In accordance with an accounting order issued on February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, the Company reclassified $36 million 
of its under recovered balance in Rate CNP Compliance to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory 
asset through Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of the Company's next depreciation study, which is 
expected to occur within the next two to four years. The Company's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.

On December 5, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that the Company leave in effect for 2018 the factors associated 
with the Company's compliance costs for the year 2017, with any under-collected amount for prior years deemed recovered 
before any current year amounts. Any under recovered amounts associated with 2018 will be reflected in the 2019 filing. As of 
December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had a deferred under recovered regulatory clause revenues balance of $17 million 
and $9 million, respectively.

Rate ECR

The Company has established energy cost recovery rates under the Company's Rate ECR as approved by the Alabama PSC. Rates 
are based on an estimate of future energy costs and the current over or under recovered balance. Revenues recognized under Rate 
ECR and recorded on the financial statements are adjusted for the difference in actual recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed in 
current regulated rates. The difference in the recoverable fuel costs and amounts billed give rise to the over or under recovered 
amounts recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities. The Company, along with the Alabama PSC, continually monitors the over or 
under recovered cost balance to determine whether an adjustment to billing rates is required. Changes in the Rate ECR factor 
have no significant effect on the Company's net income, but will impact operating cash flows. Currently, the Alabama PSC may 
approve billing rates under Rate ECR of up to 5.910 cents per KWH.

In accordance with an accounting order issued on February 17, 2017 by the Alabama PSC, the Company reclassified $36 million 
of its under recovered balance in Rate ECR to a separate regulatory asset. The amortization of the new regulatory asset through 
Rate RSE will begin concurrently with the effective date of the Company's next depreciation study, which is expected to occur 
within the next two to four years. The Company's current depreciation study became effective January 1, 2017.

On December 5, 2017, the Alabama PSC issued a consent order that the Company leave in effect for 2018 the energy cost 
recovery rates which began in 2017. Therefore, the Rate ECR factor as of January 1, 2018 remained at 2.015 cents per KWH. The 
rate will return to 5.910 cents per KWH in 2019, absent a further order from the Alabama PSC.

At December 31, 2017, the Company's under recovered fuel costs totaled $25 million, which is included in deferred under 
recovered regulatory clause revenues. At December 31, 2016, the Company had an over recovered fuel balance of $76 million, 
which was included in other regulatory liabilities, current. These classifications are based on estimates, which include such 
factors as weather, generation availability, energy demand, and the price of energy. A change in any of these factors could have a 
material impact on the timing of any recovery or return of fuel costs.

Rate NDR

Based on an order from the Alabama PSC, the Company maintains a reserve for operations and maintenance expenses to cover 
the cost of damages from major storms to its transmission and distribution facilities. The order approves a separate monthly Rate 
NDR charge to customers consisting of two components. The first component is intended to establish and maintain a reserve 
balance for future storms and is an on-going part of customer billing. When the reserve balance falls below $50 million, a reserve 
establishment charge will be activated (and the on-going reserve maintenance charge concurrently suspended) until the reserve 
balance reaches $75 million. The second component of the Rate NDR charge is intended to allow recovery of any existing 
deferred storm-related operations and maintenance costs and any future reserve deficits over a 24-month period. The Alabama 
PSC order gives the Company authority to record a deficit balance in the NDR when costs of storm damage exceed any 
established reserve balance. Absent further Alabama PSC approval, the maximum total Rate NDR charge consisting of both 
components is $10 per month per non-residential customer account and $5 per month per residential customer account. The 
Company has the authority, based on an order from the Alabama PSC, to accrue certain additional amounts as circumstances 
warrant. The order allows for reliability-related expenditures to be charged against the additional accruals when the NDR balance 
exceeds $75 million. The Company may designate a portion of the NDR to reliability-related expenditures as a part of an annual 
budget process for the following year or during the current year for identified unbudgeted reliability-related expenditures that are 

61

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

incurred. Accruals that have not been designated can be used to offset storm charges. Additional accruals to the NDR will 
enhance the Company's ability to deal with the financial effects of future natural disasters, promote system reliability, and offset 
costs retail customers would otherwise bear. No such accruals were recorded or designated in any period presented.

In December 2017, the reserve maintenance charge was suspended and the reserve establishment charge was activated as a result 
of the NDR balance falling below $50 million. The Company expects to collect approximately $16 million annually until the 
reserve balance is restored to $75 million. The NDR balance at December 31, 2017 was $38 million. 

As revenue from the Rate NDR charge is recognized, an equal amount of operations and maintenance expenses related to the 
NDR will also be recognized. As a result, the Rate NDR charge will not have an effect on net income but will impact operating 
cash flows.

Environmental Accounting Order

Based on an order from the Alabama PSC, the Company is allowed to establish a regulatory asset to record the unrecovered 
investment costs, including the unrecovered plant asset balance and the unrecovered costs associated with site removal and 
closure associated with future unit retirements caused by environmental regulations. The regulatory asset will be amortized and 
recovered over the affected unit's remaining useful life, as established prior to the decision regarding early retirement through 
Rate CNP Compliance.

The Company retired Plant Gorgas Units 6 and 7 (200 MWs) and Plant Barry Unit 3 (225 MWs) in 2015. Additionally, the 
Company ceased using coal at Plant Barry Units 1 and 2 (250 MWs) in 2015, but such units remain available on a limited basis 
with natural gas as the fuel source. In April 2016, the Company also ceased using coal at Plant Greene County Units 1 and 2 (300 
MWs representing the Company's ownership interest) and began operating Units 1 and 2 solely on natural gas in June 2016 and 
July 2016, respectively.

In accordance with this accounting order from the Alabama PSC, the Company transferred the unrecovered plant asset balances to 
regulatory assets at their respective retirement dates. These regulatory assets are being amortized and recovered through Rate 
CNP Compliance over the units' remaining useful lives, as established prior to the decision for retirement; therefore, these 
decisions associated with coal operations had no significant impact on the Company's financial statements.

4. JOINT OWNERSHIP AGREEMENTS

The Company and Georgia Power own equally all of the outstanding capital stock of SEGCO, which owns electric generating 
units with a total rated capacity of 1,020 MWs, as well as associated transmission facilities. SEGCO uses natural gas as the 
primary fuel source for 1,000 MWs of its generating capacity. The capacity of these units is sold equally to the Company and 
Georgia Power under a power contract. The Company and Georgia Power make payments sufficient to provide for the operating 
expenses, taxes, interest expense, and ROE. The Company's share of purchased power totaled $76 million in 2017, $55 million in 
2016, and $76 million in 2015 and is included in "Purchased power from affiliates" in the statements of income. The Company 
accounts for SEGCO using the equity method.

In addition, the Company has guaranteed unconditionally the obligation of SEGCO under an installment sale agreement for the 
purchase of certain pollution control facilities at SEGCO's generating units, pursuant to which $25 million principal amount of 
pollution control revenue bonds are outstanding. The Company has guaranteed $100 million principal amount of unsecured senior 
notes issued by SEGCO for general corporate purposes. These senior notes mature on December 1, 2018. Georgia Power has 
agreed to reimburse the Company for the pro rata portion of such obligations corresponding to its then proportionate ownership of 
stock of SEGCO if the Company is called upon to make such payment under its guarantee.

At December 31, 2017, the capitalization of SEGCO consisted of $95 million of equity and $125 million of long-term debt on 
which the annual interest requirement is $4 million. In addition, SEGCO had short-term debt outstanding of $14 million. SEGCO 
paid $24 million of dividends in 2017 and 2016 compared to an immaterial amount in 2015, of which one-half of each was paid 
to the Company. In addition, the Company recognizes 50% of SEGCO's net income.

The Company, which owns and operates a generating unit adjacent to the SEGCO generating units, has a joint ownership 
agreement with SEGCO for the ownership of an associated gas pipeline. The Company owns 14% of the pipeline with the 
remaining 86% owned by SEGCO. 

62

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

In addition to the Company's ownership of SEGCO and joint ownership of an associated gas pipeline, the Company's percentage 
ownership and investment in jointly-owned generating plants at December 31, 2017 were as follows:

Facility

Greene County
Plant Miller

Units 1 and 2

Total MW
Capacity

Company
Ownership

Plant in
Service

60.00% (1)

$

172

Accumulated
Depreciation
(in millions)
65

$

91.84% (2)

1,717

619

500

1,320

Construction
Work in
Progress

$

2

54

(1)  Jointly owned with an affiliate, Mississippi Power.

(2)  Jointly owned with PowerSouth Energy Cooperative, Inc.

The Company has contracted to operate and maintain its jointly-owned facilities as agent for their co-owners. The Company's 
proportionate share of its plant operating expenses is included in operating expenses in the statements of income and the 
Company is responsible for providing its own financing.

5. INCOME TAXES

On behalf of the Company, Southern Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and various combined and separate 
state income tax returns. Under a joint consolidated income tax allocation agreement, each Southern Company subsidiary's 
current and deferred tax expense is computed on a stand-alone basis and no subsidiary is allocated more current expense than 
would be paid if it filed a separate income tax return. In accordance with IRS regulations, each company is jointly and severally 
liable for the federal tax liability.

Federal Tax Reform Legislation

Following the enactment of Tax Reform Legislation, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 – "Income Tax 
Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (SAB 118), which provides for a measurement period of up to one year 
from the enactment date to complete accounting under GAAP for the tax effects of the legislation. Due to the complex and 
comprehensive nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application under GAAP, the Company considers all amounts 
recorded in the financial statements as a result of Tax Reform Legislation to be "provisional" as discussed in SAB 118 and subject 
to revision. The Company is awaiting additional guidance from industry and income tax authorities in order to finalize its 
accounting. The ultimate impact of Tax Reform Legislation on deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related regulatory 
assets and liabilities cannot be determined at this time. See Note 3 under "Retail Regulatory Matters – Rate RSE" for additional 
information.

Current and Deferred Income Taxes

Details of income tax provisions are as follows:

Federal —

Current

Deferred

State —

Current

Deferred

Total

2017

2016
(in millions)

2015

$

$

136

336

472

23

73

96

568

$

$

103

339

442

20

69
89

531

$

$

110

320

430

8

68
76

506

63

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and 
their respective tax bases, which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities, are as follows:

Deferred tax liabilities —

Accelerated depreciation

Property basis differences

Premium on reacquired debt

Employee benefit obligations

Regulatory assets associated with employee benefit obligations

Asset retirement obligations

Regulatory assets associated with asset retirement obligations

Other

Total
Deferred tax assets —

Federal effect of state deferred taxes

Unbilled fuel revenue

Storm reserve

Employee benefit obligations

Other comprehensive losses

Asset retirement obligations

Other

Total
Accumulated deferred income taxes, net

2017

2016

(in millions)

$

2,336

$

4,307

398

16

162

260

220

249

147

456

26

201

393

289

347

179

3,788

6,198

143

22

5

286

10

469

93

266

36

21

427

19

636

139

1,028
2,760

$

1,544
4,654

$

The implementation of Tax Reform Legislation significantly reduced accumulated deferred income taxes, partially offset by 
bonus depreciation provisions in the 2015 Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act. Tax Reform Legislation also significantly 
reduced tax-related regulatory assets and increased tax-related regulatory liabilities.

At December 31, 2017, the tax-related regulatory assets to be recovered from customers were $240 million. These assets are 
primarily attributable to tax benefits flowed through to customers in prior years, deferred taxes previously recognized at rates 
lower than the current enacted tax law, and taxes applicable to capitalized interest.

At December 31, 2017, the tax-related regulatory liabilities to be credited to customers were $2.1 billion. These liabilities are 
primarily attributable to deferred taxes previously recognized at rates higher than the current enacted tax law and to unamortized 
ITCs.

In accordance with regulatory requirements, deferred federal ITCs are amortized over the average life of the related property with 
such amortization normally applied as a credit to reduce depreciation in the statements of income. Credits amortized in this 
manner amounted to $7 million in 2017 and $8 million annually in 2016 and 2015. At December 31, 2017, the Company had 
federal ITC carryforwards which are expected to result in $9 million of federal income tax benefits. The federal ITC 
carryforwards begin expiring in 2038 but are expected to be fully utilized by 2027. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot 
be determined at this time.

Tax Credit Carryforwards

The Company had state credit carryforwards for the state of Alabama of approximately $4 million, which begin expiring in 2023 
but are expected to be fully utilized.

64

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Effective Tax Rate

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:

Federal statutory rate

State income tax, net of federal deduction

Non-deductible book depreciation

AFUDC equity

Tax Reform Legislation

Other

Effective income tax rate

2017

35.0%

4.4

0.9

(1.0)

0.3

—

39.6%

2016

35.0%

4.2

1.0

(0.7)

—

(0.7)

38.8%

2015

35.0%

3.8

1.2

(1.6)

—

—

38.4%

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, which changed the accounting for income taxes for share-based payment award 
transactions. Entities are required to recognize all excess tax benefits and deficiencies related to the exercise or vesting of stock 
compensation as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material 
impact on the Company's overall effective tax rate. See Note 1 under "Recently Issued Accounting Standards" for additional 
information.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The Company has no material unrecognized tax benefits for the periods presented. The Company classifies interest on tax 
uncertainties as interest expense. Accrued interest for unrecognized tax benefits was immaterial and the Company did not accrue 
any penalties on uncertain tax positions.

It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits could change within 12 months. The settlement of 
federal and state audits could impact the balances. At this time, an estimate of the range of reasonably possible outcomes cannot 
be determined.

The IRS has finalized its audits of Southern Company's consolidated federal income tax returns through 2016. Southern Company 
is a participant in the Compliance Assurance Process of the IRS. The audits for the Company's state income tax returns have 
either been concluded, or the statute of limitations has expired, for years prior to 2011.

6. FINANCING

Long-Term Debt Payable to an Affiliated Trust

The Company has formed a wholly-owned trust subsidiary for the purpose of issuing preferred securities. The proceeds of the 
related equity investments and preferred security sales were loaned back to the Company through the issuance of junior 
subordinated notes totaling $206 million outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, which constitute substantially all of the 
assets of this trust and are reflected in the balance sheets as long-term debt payable. The Company considers that the mechanisms 
and obligations relating to the preferred securities issued for its benefit, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional 
guarantee by it of the trust's payment obligations with respect to these securities. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, trust preferred 
securities of $200 million were outstanding. See Note 1 under "Variable Interest Entities" for additional information on the 
accounting treatment for this trust and the related securities.

Securities Due Within One Year

At December 31, 2017, the Company had no securities due within one year. At December 31, 2016, the Company had $561 
million of senior notes and pollution control revenue bonds due within one year.

Maturities through 2022 applicable to total long-term debt are as follows: $200 million in 2019; $250 million in 2020; $310 
million in 2021; and $750 million in 2022. There are no scheduled maturities in 2018.

Bank Term Loans

At both December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $45 million of outstanding bank term loan agreements, which are 
reflected in the statements of capitalization as long-term debt.

65

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

These bank loans have covenants that limit debt levels to 65% of total capitalization, as defined in the agreements. For purposes 
of calculating these covenants, any long-term notes payable to affiliated trusts are excluded from debt but included in 
capitalization. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with its debt limits.

Pollution Control Revenue Bonds

Pollution control revenue bond obligations represent loans to the Company from public authorities of funds or installment 
purchases of pollution control and solid waste disposal facilities financed by funds derived from sales by public authorities of 
revenue bonds. The Company is required to make payments sufficient for the authorities to meet principal and interest 
requirements of such bonds. The Company incurred no obligations related to the issuance of pollution control revenue bonds in 
2017.

In August 2017, the Company repaid at maturity $36.1 million aggregate principal amount of Series 1993-A, 1993-B, and 1993-C 
Industrial Development Board of the City of Mobile, Alabama Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (Alabama Power 
Company Project).

The Company had $1.06 billion and $1.10 billion of tax-exempt pollution control revenue bond obligations outstanding at 
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, including pollution control revenue bonds classified as due within one year.

Senior Notes

In March 2017, the Company issued $550 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017A 2.45% Senior Notes due March 
30, 2022. The proceeds were used to repay the Company's short-term indebtedness and for general corporate purposes, including 
the Company's continuous construction program.

In November 2017, the Company issued $550 million aggregate principal amount of Series 2017B 3.70% Senior Notes due 
December 1, 2047. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction 
program.

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $6.4 billion and $5.8 billion of senior notes outstanding, respectively, 
including senior notes classified as due within one year. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not have any 
outstanding secured debt.

Redeemable Preferred and Preference Stock

The Company currently has preferred stock, Class A preferred stock, and common stock outstanding. The Company also has 
authorized preference stock, none of which is outstanding. The Company's preferred stock and Class A preferred stock, without 
preference between classes, rank senior to the Company's common stock with respect to payment of dividends and voluntary and 
involuntary dissolution. The preferred stock and Class A preferred stock of the Company contain a feature that allows the holders 
to elect a majority of the Company's board of directors if preferred dividends are not paid for four consecutive quarters. Because 
such a potential redemption-triggering event is not solely within the control of the Company, the preferred stock and Class A 
preferred stock is presented as "Redeemable Preferred Stock" in a manner consistent with temporary equity under applicable 
accounting standards. 

66

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The Company's preferred stock is subject to redemption at a price equal to the par value plus a premium. The Company's Class A 
preferred stock is subject to redemption at a price equal to the stated capital. All series of the Company's preferred stock currently 
are subject to redemption at the option of the Company. The Class A preferred stock is subject to redemption on or after October 
1, 2022, or following the occurrence of a rating agency event. Information for each outstanding series is in the table below:

Preferred/Preference Stock

4.92% Preferred Stock

4.72% Preferred Stock

4.64% Preferred Stock

4.60% Preferred Stock

4.52% Preferred Stock

4.20% Preferred Stock

5.00% Class A Preferred Stock

Par Value/
Stated
Capital Per
Share

$100

$100

$100

$100

$100

$100

$25

Shares
Outstanding

Redemption
Price Per Share

80,000

50,000

60,000

100,000

50,000

135,115

10,000,000

$103.23

$102.18

$103.14

$104.20

$102.93

$105.00
Stated Capital(*)

(*)  Prior to October 1, 2022: $25.50; on or after October 1, 2022: Stated Capital

In September 2017, the Company issued 10 million shares ($250 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.00% Class A Preferred 
Stock, Cumulative, Par Value $1 Per Share (Stated Capital 25 Per Share). The proceeds were used in October 2017 to redeem all 
2 million shares ($50 million aggregate stated capital) of 6.50% Series Preference Stock, 6 million shares ($150 million aggregate 
stated capital) of 6.45% Series Preference Stock, and 1.52 million shares ($38 million aggregate stated capital) of 5.83% Class A 
Preferred Stock and for other general corporate purposes, including the Company's continuous construction program.

There were no changes for the year ended December 31, 2016 in redeemable preferred stock or preference stock of the Company.

Dividend Restrictions

The Company can only pay dividends to Southern Company out of retained earnings or paid-in-capital.

Bank Credit Arrangements

At December 31, 2017, committed credit arrangements with banks were as follows:

2018

Expires
2020
(in millions)

2022

Total

Unused

Term Out

No Term Out

Expires Within One Year

$

35

$

500

$

800

$

1,335

$

1,335

$

 (in millions)

(in millions)

— $

35

Most of the bank credit arrangements require payment of a commitment fee based on the unused portion of the commitments or 
the maintenance of compensating balances with the banks. Commitment fees average less than 1/4 of 1% for the Company. 
Compensating balances are not legally restricted from withdrawal.

Subject to applicable market conditions, the Company expects to renew or replace its bank credit agreements as needed, prior to 
expiration. In connection therewith, the Company may extend the maturity date and/or increase or decrease the lending 
commitments thereunder.

Most of the Company's bank credit arrangements contain covenants that limit the Company's debt level to 65% of total 
capitalization, as defined in the arrangements. For purposes of calculating these covenants, any long-term notes payable to 
affiliated trusts are excluded from debt but included in capitalization. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance 
with the debt limit covenants.

A portion of the unused credit with banks is allocated to provide liquidity support to the Company's pollution control revenue 
bonds and commercial paper programs. The amount of variable rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding requiring 
liquidity support was $854 million as of December 31, 2017. In addition, at December 31, 2017, the Company had $120 million 
of fixed rate pollution control revenue bonds outstanding that were required to be remarketed within the next 12 months.

The Company borrows through commercial paper programs that have the liquidity support of the committed bank credit 
arrangements described above. The Company may also make short-term borrowings through various other arrangements with 

67

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

banks. At December 31, 2017, the Company had $3 million in short-term debt outstanding and none at December 31, 2016. At 
December 31, 2017, the Company had regulatory approval to have outstanding up to $2.0 billion of short-term borrowings.

7. COMMITMENTS

Fuel and Purchased Power Agreements

To supply a portion of the fuel requirements of its generating plants, the Company has entered into various long-term 
commitments for the procurement and delivery of fossil and nuclear fuel which are not recognized on the balance sheets. In 2017, 
2016, and 2015, the Company incurred fuel expense of $1.2 billion, $1.3 billion, and $1.3 billion, respectively, the majority of 
which was purchased under long-term commitments. The Company expects that a substantial amount of its future fuel needs will 
continue to be purchased under long-term commitments.

In addition, the Company has entered into various long-term commitments for the purchase of capacity and electricity, some of 
which are accounted for as operating leases. Total capacity expense under PPAs accounted for as operating leases was $41 
million, $42 million, and $38 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Total estimated minimum long-term obligations at 
December 31, 2017 were as follows:

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023 and thereafter
Total commitments

Operating
Lease
PPAs
(in millions)

$

$

41
43
44
46
47
—
221

SCS may enter into various types of wholesale energy and natural gas contracts acting as an agent for the Company and all of the 
other traditional electric operating companies and Southern Power. Under these agreements, each of the traditional electric 
operating companies and Southern Power may be jointly and severally liable. Accordingly, Southern Company has entered into 
keep-well agreements with the Company and each of the other traditional electric operating companies to ensure the Company 
will not subsidize or be responsible for any costs, losses, liabilities, or damages resulting from the inclusion of Southern Power as 
a contracting party under these agreements.

Operating Leases

The Company has entered into operating leases with Southern Linc and third parties for the use of cellular tower space. 
Substantially all of these agreements have initial terms ranging from five to 10 years and renewal options of up to 20 years. The 
Company has entered into rental agreements for towers, coal railcars, vehicles, and other equipment with various terms and 
expiration dates. Total rent expense under these agreements was $25 million in 2017, $18 million in 2016, and $19 million in 
2015. Of these amounts, $11 million, $14 million, and $13 million for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, relate to the railcar 
leases and was recovered through the Company's Rate ECR. The Company includes any step rents, fixed escalations, and lease 
concessions in its computation of minimum lease payments. 

68

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2017, estimated minimum lease payments under operating leases were as follows:

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023 and thereafter

Total

Minimum Lease Payments(a)

Affiliate 
Operating 
Leases(b)

Railcars
(in millions)

Vehicles 
& Other

Total

$

$

8

10

8

7

5

16

54

$

$

7

7

7

6

5

4

$

36

$

6

5

3

1

—

—

15

$

21

22

18

14

10

20

$

105

(a)  Minimum lease payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rentals of $3 million in the future.

(b)  Includes operating leases for cellular tower space.

In addition to the above rental commitments payments, the Company has potential obligations upon expiration of certain railcar 
leases with respect to the residual value of the leased property. These leases have terms expiring through 2023 with maximum 
obligations under these leases of $12 million in 2023. There are no obligations under these leases through 2022. At the 
termination of the leases, the lessee may either exercise its purchase option, or the property can be sold to a third party. The 
Company expects that the fair market value of the leased property would substantially reduce or eliminate the Company's 
payments under the residual value obligations.

Guarantees

The Company has guaranteed the obligation of SEGCO for $25 million of pollution control revenue bonds issued in 2001, which 
mature in June 2019, and also $100 million of senior notes issued in 2013, which mature in December 2018. Georgia Power has 
agreed to reimburse the Company for the pro rata portion of such obligations corresponding to Georgia Power's then 
proportionate ownership of SEGCO's stock if the Company is called upon to make such payment under its guarantee. See Note 4 
for additional information.

8. STOCK COMPENSATION 

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation primarily in the form of Southern Company performance share units and restricted stock units may be 
granted through the Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan to a large segment of the Company's employees ranging from line 
management to executives. In 2015 and 2016, stock-based compensation consisted exclusively of performance share units. 
Beginning in 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees includes restricted stock units in addition to performance 
share units. Prior to 2015, stock-based compensation also included stock options. As of December 31, 2017, there were 793 
current and former employees participating in the stock option, performance share unit, and restricted stock unit programs.

Performance Share Units

Performance share units granted to employees vest at the end of a three-year performance period. All unvested performance share 
units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving corporation. Shares of Southern 
Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the performance period with the number of shares issued 
ranging from 0% to 200% of the target number of performance share units granted, based on achievement of the performance 
goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Southern Company Board of Directors.

Southern Company issues performance share units with performance goals based on three performance goals to employees. These 
include performance share units with performance goals based on the total shareholder return (TSR) for Southern Company 
common stock during the three-year performance period as compared to a group of industry peers, performance share units with 
performance goals based on Southern Company's cumulative earnings per share (EPS) over the performance period, and 
performance share units with performance goals based on Southern Company's equity-weighted ROE over the performance 
period.

69

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

In 2015 and 2016, the EPS-based and ROE-based awards each represented 25% of the total target grant date fair value of the 
performance share unit awards granted. The remaining 50% of the total target grant date fair value consisted of TSR-based 
awards. Beginning in 2017, the total target grant date fair value of the stock compensation awards granted was comprised 20% 
each of EPS-based awards and ROE-based awards and 30% each of TSR-based awards and restricted stock units.

The fair value of TSR-based performance share unit awards is determined as of the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation 
model to estimate the TSR of Southern Company's common stock among the industry peers over the performance period. The 
Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the three-year performance period without 
remeasurement.

The fair values of the EPS-based awards and the ROE-based awards are based on the closing stock price of Southern Company 
common stock on the date of the grant. Compensation expense for the EPS-based and ROE-based awards is generally recognized 
ratably over the three-year performance period initially assuming a 100% payout at the end of the performance period. Employees 
become immediately vested in the TSR-based performance share units, along with the EPS-based and ROE-based awards, upon 
retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized 
immediately while compensation expense for employees that become retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized 
over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility. The expected payout related to the EPS-based and ROE-based 
awards is reevaluated annually with expense recognized to date increased or decreased based on the number of shares currently 
expected to be issued. Unlike the TSR-based awards, the compensation expense ultimately recognized for the EPS-based awards 
and the ROE-based awards will be based on the actual number of shares issued at the end of the performance period.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, employees of the Company were granted performance share units of 
135,502, 249,065, and 214,709, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of TSR-based performance share units 
granted during 2017, 2016, and 2015, determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the TSR of Southern 
Company's stock among the industry peers over the performance period, was $49.07, $45.15, and $46.42, respectively. The 
weighted average grant-date fair value of both EPS-based and ROE-based performance share units granted during 2017, 2016, 
and 2015 was $49.21, $48.86, and $47.78, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, total compensation cost for performance share units recognized in 
income was $9 million, $15 million, and $13 million, respectively, with the related tax benefit also recognized in income of $4 
million, $6 million, and $5 million, respectively. The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company performance 
share units to the Company's employees is recognized in the Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to 
equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern Company. As of December 31, 2017, $2 million of total unrecognized 
compensation cost related to performance share award units will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 
21 months.

Restricted Stock Units

Beginning in 2017, stock-based compensation granted to employees included restricted stock units in addition to performance 
share units. One-third of the restricted stock units granted to employees vest each year throughout a three-year service period. All 
unvested restricted stock units vest immediately upon a change in control where Southern Company is not the surviving 
corporation. Shares of Southern Company common stock are delivered to employees at the end of the vesting period.

The fair value of restricted stock units is based on the closing stock price of Southern Company common stock on the date of the 
grant. Since one-third of the restricted stock units vest each year throughout a three-year service period, compensation expense 
for restricted stock unit awards is generally recognized over the corresponding one-, two-, or three-year period. Employees 
become immediately vested in the restricted stock units upon retirement. As a result, compensation expense for employees that 
are retirement eligible at the grant date is recognized immediately while compensation expense for employees that become 
retirement eligible during the vesting period is recognized over the period from grant date to the date of retirement eligibility.  

For the year ended December 31, 2017, employees of the Company were granted 58,001 restricted stock units. The weighted 
average grant-date fair value of restricted stock units granted during 2017 was $49.21.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, total compensation cost for restricted stock units recognized in income was $3 million 
with the related tax benefit also recognized in income of $1 million. As of December 31, 2017, total unrecognized compensation 
cost related to restricted stock units was immaterial. 

Stock Options

In 2015, Southern Company discontinued the granting of stock options. Stock options expire no later than 10 years after the grant 
date and the latest possible exercise will occur no later than November 2024.

70

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

The compensation cost related to the grant of Southern Company stock options to the Company's employees is recognized in the 
Company's financial statements with a corresponding credit to equity, representing a capital contribution from Southern 
Company. Compensation cost and related tax benefits recognized in the Company's financial statements were not material for any 
year presented. As of December 31, 2017, all compensation cost related to stock option awards has been recognized.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $12 million, $21 
million, and $8 million, respectively. No cash proceeds are received by the Company upon the exercise of stock options. The 
actual tax benefit realized by the Company for the tax deductions from stock option exercises totaled $5 million, $8 million, and 
$3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09 in 2016, 
the excess tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options were recognized in the Company's financial statements with a 
credit to equity. Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-09, beginning in 2016, all tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options are 
recognized in income. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate intrinsic value for the options outstanding and exercisable was 
$17 million.

9. NUCLEAR INSURANCE

Under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act (Act), the Company maintains agreements of indemnity with the NRC that, together 
with private insurance, cover third-party liability arising from any nuclear incident occurring at Plant Farley. The Act provides 
funds up to $13.4 billion for public liability claims that could arise from a single nuclear incident. Plant Farley is insured against 
this liability to a maximum of $450 million by American Nuclear Insurers (ANI), with the remaining coverage provided by a 
mandatory program of deferred premiums that could be assessed, after a nuclear incident, against all owners of commercial 
nuclear reactors. The Company could be assessed up to $127 million per incident for each licensed reactor it operates but not 
more than an aggregate of $19 million per incident to be paid in a calendar year for each reactor. Such maximum assessment, 
excluding any applicable state premium taxes, for the Company is $255 million per incident but not more than an aggregate of 
$38 million to be paid for each incident in any one year. Both the maximum assessment per reactor and the maximum yearly 
assessment are adjusted for inflation at least every five years. The next scheduled adjustment is due no later than September 10, 
2018.

The Company is a member of Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL), a mutual insurer established to provide property 
damage insurance in an amount up to $1.5 billion for members' operating nuclear generating facilities. Additionally, the Company 
has NEIL policies that currently provide decontamination, excess property insurance, and premature decommissioning coverage 
up to $1.25 billion for nuclear losses and policies providing coverage up to $750 million for non-nuclear losses in excess of the 
$1.5 billion primary coverage.

NEIL also covers the additional costs that would be incurred in obtaining replacement power during a prolonged accidental 
outage at a member's nuclear plant. Members can purchase this coverage, subject to a deductible waiting period of up to 26 
weeks, with a maximum per occurrence per unit limit of $490 million. After the deductible period, weekly indemnity payments 
would be received until either the unit is operational or until the limit is exhausted. The Company purchases limits based on the 
projected full cost of replacement power and has elected a 12-week deductible waiting period.

Under each of the NEIL policies, members are subject to assessments each year if losses exceed the accumulated funds available 
to the insurer. The maximum annual assessments for the Company as of December 31, 2017 under the NEIL policies would be 
$55 million.

Claims resulting from terrorist acts are covered under both the ANI and NEIL policies (subject to normal policy limits). The 
aggregate, however, that NEIL will pay for all claims resulting from terrorist acts in any 12-month period is $3.2 billion plus such 
additional amounts NEIL can recover through reinsurance, indemnity, or other sources.

For all on-site property damage insurance policies for commercial nuclear power plants, the NRC requires that the proceeds of 
such policies shall be dedicated first for the sole purpose of placing the reactor in a safe and stable condition after an accident. 
Any remaining proceeds are to be applied next toward the costs of decontamination and debris removal operations ordered by the 
NRC, and any further remaining proceeds are to be paid either to the Company or to its debt trustees as may be appropriate under 
the policies and applicable trust indentures. In the event of a loss, the amount of insurance available might not be adequate to 
cover property damage and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses and other expenses, to the extent not recovered from 
customers, would be borne by the Company and could have a material effect on the Company's financial condition and results of 
operations.

All retrospective assessments, whether generated for liability, property, or replacement power, may be subject to applicable state 
premium taxes.

71

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value measurements are based on inputs of observable and unobservable market data that a market participant would use in 
pricing the asset or liability. The use of observable inputs is maximized where available and the use of unobservable inputs is 
minimized for fair value measurement and reflects a three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques 
used for fair value measurement.

•  Level 1 consists of observable market data in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.

•  Level 2 consists of observable market data, other than that included in Level 1, that is either directly or indirectly observable.

•  Level 3 consists of unobservable market data. The input may reflect the assumptions of the Company of what a market 
participant would use in pricing an asset or liability. If there is little available market data, then the Company's own 
assumptions are the best available information.

In the case of multiple inputs being used in a fair value measurement, the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value 
measurement represents the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement is reported.

As of December 31, 2017, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their 
associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

(in millions)

Net Asset
Value as a
Practical
Expedient
(NAV)

Total

$

— $

4

$

— $

— $

442
62

—
21
—
—
6
349
880

$

— $

81
59

24
160
18
—
—
—
346

10

$

$

$

$

—
—

—
—
—
—
—
—
— $

—
—

—
—
—
29
—
—
29

$

4

523
121

24
181
18
29
6
349
1,255

— $

— $

10

As of December 31, 2017:

Assets:

Energy-related derivatives
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(*)

Domestic equity
Foreign equity
U.S. Treasury and government agency
securities
Corporate bonds
Mortgage and asset backed securities
Private equity
Other

Cash equivalents
Total

Liabilities:

Energy-related derivatives

(*)  Excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases. See Note 1 under 

"Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.

72

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2016, assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period, together with their 
associated level of the fair value hierarchy, were as follows:

Fair Value Measurements Using

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

(in millions)

Net Asset
Value as a
Practical
Expedient
(NAV)

Total

$

— $

20

$

— $

— $

20

385

48

—

22

—

—

—

262

717

72

47

21

146

19

—

10

—

$

335

— $

9

$

$

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

$

$

— $

— $

—

—

—

—

—

20

—

—

20

—

457

95

21

168

19

20

10

262

1,072

$

$

9

As of December 31, 2016:

Assets:

Energy-related derivatives
Nuclear decommissioning trusts:(*)

Domestic equity

Foreign equity

U.S. Treasury and government agency
securities

Corporate bonds

Mortgage and asset backed securities

Private equity

Other

Cash equivalents

Total

Liabilities:

Energy-related derivatives

(*)  Excludes receivables related to investment income, pending investment sales, and payables related to pending investment purchases. See Note 1 under 

"Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information.

Valuation Methodologies

The energy-related derivatives primarily consist of over-the-counter financial products for natural gas and physical power 
products, including, from time to time, basis swaps. These are standard products used within the energy industry and are valued 
using the market approach. The inputs used are mainly from observable market sources, such as forward natural gas prices, power 
prices, implied volatility, and overnight index swap interest rates. Interest rate derivatives are also standard over-the-counter 
products that are valued using observable market data and assumptions commonly used by market participants. The fair value of 
interest rate derivatives reflects the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the swap agreement based on the 
market's expectation of future interest rates. Additional inputs to the net present value calculation may include the contract terms, 
counterparty credit risk, and occasionally, implied volatility of interest rate options. The interest rate derivatives are categorized 
as Level 2 under Fair Value Measurements as these inputs are based on observable data and valuations of similar instruments. See 
Note 11 for additional information on how these derivatives are used.

The NRC requires licensees of commissioned nuclear power reactors to establish a plan for providing reasonable assurance of 
funds for future decommissioning. For fair value measurements of the investments within the nuclear decommissioning trusts, 
external pricing vendors are designated for each asset class with each security specifically assigned a primary pricing source. For 
investments held within commingled funds, fair value is determined at the end of each business day through the net asset value, 
which is established by obtaining the underlying securities' individual prices from the primary pricing source. See Note 1 under 
"Nuclear Decommissioning" for additional information. A market price secured from the primary source vendor is then evaluated 
by management in its valuation of the assets within the trusts. As a general approach, fixed income market pricing vendors gather 
market data (including indices and market research reports) and integrate relative credit information, observed market 
movements, and sector news into proprietary pricing models, pricing systems, and mathematical tools. Dealer quotes and other 
market information, including live trading levels and pricing analysts' judgments, are also obtained when available.

73

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value measurements of private equity investments held in the nuclear 
decommissioning trusts that are calculated at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient, as well as the 
nature and risks of those investments, were as follows:

As of December 31, 2017

As of December 31, 2016

Fair
Value

Unfunded
Commitments

Redemption
Frequency

Redemption
Notice Period

(in millions)

29

20

$

$

$

$

21

25

Not
Applicable
Not 
Applicable

Not
Applicable
Not
Applicable

Private equity funds include a fund-of-funds that invests in high quality private equity funds across several market sectors, funds 
that invest in real estate assets, and a fund that acquires companies to create resale value. Private equity funds do not have 
redemption rights. Distributions from these funds will be received as the underlying investments in the funds are liquidated. 
Liquidations of these investments are expected to occur at various times over the next 10 years.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount did not equal fair value were as 
follows:

Long-term debt, including securities due within one year:
2017

2016

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

(in millions)

$

$

7,625

7,092

$

$

8,305

7,544

The fair values are determined using Level 2 measurements and are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues 
or on the current rates available to the Company.

11. DERIVATIVES

The Company is exposed to market risks, including commodity price risk and interest rate risk. To manage the volatility 
attributable to these exposures, the Company nets its exposures, where possible, to take advantage of natural offsets and enters 
into various derivative transactions for the remaining exposures pursuant to the Company's policies in areas such as counterparty 
exposure and risk management practices. The Company's policy is that derivatives are to be used primarily for hedging purposes 
and mandates strict adherence to all applicable risk management policies. Derivative positions are monitored using techniques 
including, but not limited to, market valuation, value at risk, stress testing, and sensitivity analysis. Derivative instruments are 
recognized at fair value in the balance sheets as either assets or liabilities and are presented on a net basis. See Note 10 for 
additional information. In the statements of cash flows, the cash impacts of settled energy-related and interest rate derivatives are 
recorded as operating activities.

Energy-Related Derivatives

The Company enters into energy-related derivatives to hedge exposures to electricity, gas, and other fuel price changes. However, 
due to cost-based rate regulations and other various cost recovery mechanisms, the Company has limited exposure to market 
volatility in energy-related commodity prices. The Company manages fuel-hedging programs, implemented per the guidelines of 
the Alabama PSC, through the use of financial derivative contracts, which is expected to continue to mitigate price volatility.

Energy-related derivative contracts are accounted for under one of two methods:
•  Regulatory Hedges – Energy-related derivative contracts which are designated as regulatory hedges relate primarily to the 

Company's fuel-hedging programs, where gains and losses are initially recorded as regulatory liabilities and assets, 
respectively, and then are included in fuel expense as the underlying fuel is used in operations and ultimately recovered 
through the energy cost recovery clause.

•  Not Designated – Gains and losses on energy-related derivative contracts that are not designated or fail to qualify as hedges 

are recognized in the statements of income as incurred.

74

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Some energy-related derivative contracts require physical delivery as opposed to financial settlement, and this type of derivative 
is both common and prevalent within the electric industry. When an energy-related derivative contract is settled physically, any 
cumulative unrealized gain or loss is reversed and the contract price is recognized in the respective line item representing the 
actual price of the underlying goods being delivered.

At December 31, 2017, the net volume of energy-related derivative contracts for natural gas positions totaled 69 million mmBtu 
for the Company, with the longest hedge date of 2020 over which it is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows 
for forecasted transactions.

In addition to the volume discussed above, the Company enters into physical natural gas supply contracts that provide the option 
to sell back excess gas due to operational constraints. The expected volume of natural gas subject to such a feature is 5 million 
mmBtu.

Interest Rate Derivatives

The Company may also enter into interest rate derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in interest rates. Derivatives related to 
existing variable rate securities or forecasted transactions are accounted for as cash flow hedges where the effective portion of the 
derivatives' fair value gains or losses is recorded in OCI and is reclassified into earnings at the same time the hedged transactions 
affect earnings. The derivatives employed as hedging instruments are structured to minimize ineffectiveness, which is recorded 
directly to earnings.

At December 31, 2017, there were no interest rate derivatives outstanding.

The estimated pre-tax losses related to interest rate derivatives that will be reclassified from accumulated OCI to interest expense 
for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2018 are $6 million. The Company has deferred gains and losses that are expected 
to be amortized into earnings through 2035.

Derivative Financial Statement Presentation and Amounts

The Company enters into energy-related and interest rate derivative contracts that may contain provisions that permit intra-
contract netting of derivative receivables and payables for routine billing and offsets related to events of default and settlements. 
Fair value amounts of derivative assets and liabilities on the balance sheets are presented net to the extent that there are netting 
arrangements or similar agreements with the counterparties.

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of energy-related derivatives was reflected on the balance sheets as follows:

Derivative Category and Balance Sheet Location

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

2017

2016

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments for regulatory
purposes

Energy-related derivatives:

Other current assets/Other current liabilities

Other deferred charges and assets/Other deferred credits and
liabilities

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments for
regulatory purposes

Gross amounts recognized

Gross amounts offset

Net amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets

$

$

$

$

$

2 $

2

4 $

4 $
(4) $
— $

(in millions)

6 $

4

10 $
10 $
(4) $
6 $

13 $

7

20 $

20 $
(8) $
12 $

5

4

9

9

(8)

1

Energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments were immaterial on the balance sheets for 2017 and 2016.

75

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the pre-tax effect of unrealized derivative gains (losses) arising from energy-related derivatives 
designated as regulatory hedging instruments and deferred were as follows:

Derivative Category

Energy-related derivatives:

Unrealized Losses

Unrealized Gains

Balance Sheet
Location

2017

2016

(in millions)

Balance Sheet
Location

Other regulatory
assets, current

Other regulatory
assets, deferred

$

(4)

$

(1)

(3)

—

Other regulatory
liabilities, current

Other regulatory
liabilities, deferred

2017

2016

(in millions)

$

1

$

—

8

4

Total energy-related derivative
gains (losses)

$

(7)

$

(1)

$

1

$

12

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the pre-tax effect of interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow 
hedging instruments on the statements of income was as follows:

Derivatives in Cash Flow
Hedging Relationships

Gain (Loss) Recognized in
OCI on Derivative
(Effective Portion)

Derivative Category

2017

2016
(in millions)

2015

Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into
Income (Effective Portion)

Statements of Income 
Location

2017

Amount

2016
(in millions)

2015

Interest rate derivatives

$ — $

(3)

$

(7)

Interest expense, net of
amounts capitalized

$

(6)

$

(6)

$

(3)

There was no material ineffectiveness recorded in earnings for any period presented.

The pre-tax effect of energy-related derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the statements of income was not 
material for any year presented.

Contingent Features

The Company does not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as 
a result of a credit rating downgrade. There are certain derivatives that could require collateral, but not accelerated payment, in 
the event of various credit rating changes of certain affiliated companies.

At December 31, 2017, the fair value of derivative liabilities with contingent features was $1 million. However, because of joint 
and several liability features underlying these derivatives, the maximum potential collateral requirements arising from the credit-
risk related contingent features, at a rating below BBB- and/or Baa3, were $12 million, and include certain agreements that could 
require collateral in the event that one or more Southern Company system power pool participants has a credit rating change to 
below investment grade.

Generally, collateral may be provided by a Southern Company guaranty, letter of credit, or cash. If collateral is required, fair 
value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral are not offset against 
fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty.

The Company maintains accounts with certain regional transmission organizations to facilitate financial derivative transactions. 
Based on the value of the positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, the Company may be required to 
post collateral. At December 31, 2017, the Company's collateral posted in these accounts was not material.

The Company is exposed to losses related to financial instruments in the event of counterparties' nonperformance. The Company 
only enters into agreements and material transactions with counterparties that have investment grade credit ratings by Moody's 
and S&P or with counterparties who have posted collateral to cover potential credit exposure. The Company has also established 
risk management policies and controls to determine and monitor the creditworthiness of counterparties in order to mitigate the 
Company's exposure to counterparty credit risk. Therefore, the Company does not anticipate a material adverse effect on the 
financial statements as a result of counterparty nonperformance.

76

NOTES (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

12. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

Summarized quarterly financial information for 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

Quarter Ended

March 2017
June 2017
September 2017
December 2017

March 2016
June 2016
September 2016
December 2016

Operating
Revenues

Operating
Income

Net Income After
Dividends on
Preferred and
Preference Stock

$

$

1,382
1,484
1,740
1,433

1,331
1,444
1,785
1,329

$

$

(in millions)
376
454
616
268

333
430
650
252

$

$

174
230
325
119

156
213
351
102

The Company's business is influenced by seasonal weather conditions.

77

SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017 
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

$

$

$
$

Operating Revenues (in millions)
Net Income After Dividends
on Preferred and Preference Stock (in millions) $
Cash Dividends on Common Stock (in millions)
$
Return on Average Common Equity (percent)
Total Assets (in millions)(a)(b)
Gross Property Additions (in millions)
Capitalization (in millions):
Common stock equity
Preference stock
Redeemable preferred stock
Long-term debt(a)
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)
Capitalization Ratios (percent):
Common stock equity
Preference stock
Redeemable preferred stock
Long-term debt(a)
Total (excluding amounts due within one year)
Customers (year-end):
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other
Total
Employees (year-end)

$

$

$
$

$
$

$

$

2017
6,039

848
714
12.89
23,864
1,949

6,829
—
291
7,628
14,748

46.3
—
2.0
51.7
100.0

$

$
$

$
$

$

$

2016
5,889

822
765
13.34
22,516
1,338

6,323
196
85
6,535
13,139

48.1
1.5
0.7
49.7
100.0

$

$
$

$
$

$

$

2015
5,768

785
571
13.37
21,721
1,492

5,992
196
85
6,654
12,927

46.4
1.5
0.7
51.4
100.0

$

$
$

$
$

$

$

2014
5,942

761
550
13.52
20,493
1,543

5,752
343
342
6,137
12,574

45.8
2.7
2.7
48.8
100.0

2013
5,618

712
644
13.07
19,185
1,204

5,502
343
342
6,195
12,382

44.4
2.8
2.7
50.1
100.0

1,268,271
199,840
6,171
766
1,475,048
6,613

1,262,752
199,146
6,090
762
1,468,750
6,805

1,253,875
197,920
6,056
757
1,458,608
6,986

1,247,061
197,082
6,032
753
1,450,928
6,935

1,241,998
196,209
5,851
751
1,444,809
6,896

(a) A reclassification of debt issuance costs from Total Assets to Long-term debt of $40 million and $38 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013,

respectively, in accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.

(b) A reclassification of deferred tax assets from Total Assets of $20 million and $27 million is reflected for years 2014 and 2013, respectively, in

accordance with new accounting standards adopted in 2015 and applied retrospectively.

78

SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA 2013-2017 (continued)
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report

Operating Revenues (in millions):
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other
Total retail
Wholesale — non-affiliates
Wholesale — affiliates
Total revenues from sales of electricity
Other revenues
Total
Kilowatt-Hour Sales (in millions):
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Other
Total retail
Wholesale — non-affiliates
Wholesale — affiliates
Total
Average Revenue Per Kilowatt-Hour (cents):
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Total retail
Wholesale
Total sales
Residential Average Annual 
Kilowatt-Hour Use Per Customer
Residential Average Annual
Revenue Per Customer
Plant Nameplate Capacity
Ratings (year-end) (megawatts)
Maximum Peak-Hour Demand (megawatts):
Winter
Summer
Annual Load Factor (percent)
Plant Availability (percent):
Fossil-steam
Nuclear
Source of Energy Supply (percent):
Coal
Nuclear
Hydro
Gas
Purchased power —
From non-affiliates
From affiliates

Total

$

$

2017

2,302
1,649
1,477
30
5,458
276
97
5,831
208
6,039

17,219
13,606
22,687
198
53,710
5,415
4,166
63,291

13.37
12.12
6.51
10.16
3.89
9.21

2016

2015

2014

2013

$

$

2,322
1,627
1,416
(43)
5,322
283
69
5,674
215
5,889

$

$

18,343
14,091
22,310
208
54,952
5,744
3,177
63,873

12.66
11.55
6.35
9.68
3.95
8.88

$

$

2,207
1,564
1,436
27
5,234
241
84
5,559
209
5,768

18,082
14,102
23,380
201
55,765
3,567
4,515
63,847

12.21
11.09
6.14
9.39
4.02
8.71

$

$

2,209
1,533
1,480
27
5,249
281
189
5,719
223
5,942

18,726
14,118
23,799
211
56,854
3,588
6,713
67,155

11.80
10.86
6.22
9.23
4.56
8.52

2,079
1,477
1,369
27
4,952
248
212
5,412
206
5,618

17,920
13,892
22,904
211
54,927
3,711
7,672
66,310

11.60
10.63
5.98
9.02
4.04
8.16

13,601

14,568

14,454

15,051

14,451

$

1,819

$

1,844

$

1,764

$

1,775

$

1,676

11,797

11,797

11,797

12,222

12,222

10,282
10,932
63.5

83.0
88.0

47.1
20.3
4.8
17.1

4.8
5.9
100.0

12,162
11,292
58.4

81.5
92.1

49.1
21.3
5.6
14.6

4.4
5.0
100.0

11,761
11,054
61.4

82.5
93.3

49.0
20.7
5.5
15.4

3.6
5.8
100.0

9,347
10,692
64.9

87.3
90.7

50.0
20.3
8.1
15.7

2.9
3.0
100.0

10,513
10,711
63.5

82.8
97.6

44.8
22.2
5.4
18.1

4.6
4.9
100.0

79

DIRECTORS	AND	OFFICERS	
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report 

Directors 
Whit Armstrong 
Managing Member, 
Creeke Capital Investments, LLC 
David J. Cooper, Sr.1 
Vice Chairman, 
Cooper/T. Smith Corporation 

Mark A. Crosswhite 
Chairman, President, and CEO, 
Alabama Power Company  

O.B. Grayson Hall, Jr. 
Chairman and CEO, 
Regions Financial Corporation  

Anthony A. Joseph 
Shareholder, 
Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C. 
Patricia M. King1 
Chairman, 
Sunny King Automotive Group 

James K. Lowder 
Chairman, 
The Colonial Company 

Robert D. Powers 
President, 
The Eufaula Agency, Inc. 

Catherine J. Randall 
Chairman, 
Pettus Randall Holdings, LLC 

C. Dowd Ritter 
Retired Chairman and CEO, 
Regions Financial Corporation 

R. Mitchell Shackleford III 
President, 
Canfor Southern Pine 

Officers 
Mark A. Crosswhite 
Chairman, President, and CEO 

Philip C. Raymond 
Executive Vice President, Chief 
Financial Officer, and Treasurer 

Gregory J. Barker 
Executive Vice President 

Zeke W. Smith 
Executive Vice President 
Alexia B. Borden2 
Senior Vice President 
and General Counsel 
Matthew W. Bowden3 
Senior Vice President and General 
Counsel 

James P. Heilbron 
Senior Vice President and  Senior 
Production Officer 

John O. Hudson III 
Senior Vice President 

Gordon G. Martin 
Senior Vice President 
R. Scott Moore4 
Senior Vice President 

Quentin P. Riggins 
Senior Vice President 

Anita Allcorn-Walker 
Vice President and Comptroller 

Ronald Q. Patterson 
Vice President and Assistant 
Treasurer 

Myla E. Calhoun 
Vice President 

Susan B. Comensky 
Vice President 

Stephanie K. Cooper 
Vice President 

Mark S. Crews 
Vice President 

J. Leigh Davis 
Vice President 
Daniel K. Glover5 
Vice President 
R. Myrk Harkins5 
Vice President 

Richard O. Hutto 
Vice President 

Patrick T. Murphy, Jr. 
Vice President 

80 

Kenneth F. Novak 
Vice President 

J. Jeffrey Peoples 
Vice President 

Jonathan K. Porter 
Vice President 

Ashley N. Robinett 
Vice President 

Leslie L. Sanders 
Vice President 

R. Michael Saxon 
Vice President 

Don A. Scivley 
Vice President 
Julia H. Segars5 
Vice President 
J. Houston Smith, III6 
Vice President 

Anthony A. Smoke 
Vice President 
Robert L. Weaver7 
Vice President 

Ceila H. Shorts 
Corporate Secretary 

Wendy M. Hoomes 
Assistant Comptroller 

Melissa K. Caen 
Assistant Secretary and 
Assistant Treasurer 

Amy E. Blankenship 
Assistant Secretary 

Kimberly L. Jackson 
Assistant Secretary 

Christopher R. Blake 
Assistant Treasurer 

Brian E. George 
Assistant Treasurer 

1 Retiring effective 4/2018 
2 Elected effective 11/2017 

(previously served as Vice 
President) 

3 Deceased 10/2017 
4 Elected effective 5/2017 

(previously served as Vice 
President) 

5 Retired effective 7/2017 
6 Elected effective 11/2017 
7 Resigned effective 4/2017 

 
 
 
 
 
CORPORATE INFORMATION 
Alabama Power Company 2017 Annual Report 

General 
This annual report is submitted for general 
information and is not intended for use in 
connection with any sale or purchase of, or 
any solicitation of offers to buy or sell 
securities. 

Profile 
The Company operates as a vertically 
integrated utility providing electric service to 
retail and wholesale customers within its 
traditional service territory located in the 
State of Alabama in addition to wholesale 
customers in the Southeast. The Company 
provides electric service to more than 1.4 
million customers. In 2017, retail energy 
sales accounted for 85% percent of the 
Company’s total sales of 63 billion kilowatt-
hours. 

The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary 
of  The Southern Company, which is the 
parent  company of four traditional electric 
operating companies, Southern Power 
Company, and Southern Company Gas. There 
is no established public trading market for the 
Company’s common stock. 

Trustee, Registrar, and Paying Agent 
All series of Senior Notes and Trust 
Preferred Securities 
Regions Bank 
Corporate Trust 
1900 5th Avenue North, 25th Floor 
Birmingham, AL 35203 

Registrar, Transfer Agent, and Dividend 
Paying Agent 
All series of Preferred Stock 
EQ Shareowner Services  
P.O. Box 64856 
St. Paul, MN  55154-0856 
(800) 554-7626 

shareowneronline.com 

81 

Number of Preferred Shareholders of record 
as of December 31, 2017 was 1,145. 

Dividends on the Company’s common stock 
are payable at the discretion of the 
Company’s board of directors. The 
dividends declared by the Company to its 
common stockholder for the past two years 
were as follows: 

Quarter 

First 
Second 
Third 
Fourth 

2017 
(in thousands) 

2016 

$178,507 
178,507 
178,507 
178,507 

$191,206 
191,206 
191,206 
191,206 

Form 10-K 
A copy of the Form 10-K as filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission will 
be  provided upon written request to the 
office of the Corporate Secretary.  For 
additional information, contact the office of 
the Corporate Secretary at (205) 257-1000. 

Alabama Power Company  
600 North 18th Street  
Birmingham, AL 35203 
(205) 257-1000 
www.alabamapower.com 

Independent Auditors 
Deloitte & Touche LLP 
420 North 20th Street  
Suite 2400 
Birmingham, AL 35203 

Legal Counsel 
Balch & Bingham LLP 
P.O. Box 306 
Birmingham, AL 35201