ANNUAL REPORT
2020
www.albireopharma.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
☒
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020
or
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 001-33451
Albireo Pharma, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
10 Post Office Square, Suite 1000
Boston, MA
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
90-0136863
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
02109
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
(857) 254-5555
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Trading Symbol(s)
ALBO
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
The Nasdaq Capital Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
☐
☒
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
☐
☒
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under
Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant (without admitting that any person whose shares are not included in such calculation is
an affiliate) was approximately $394.2 million based on the price at which the common stock was last sold on The Nasdaq Capital Market as of the last business day of the registrant’s most
recently completed second fiscal quarter.
The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of February 18, 2021, was 19,113,603.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
The following documents (or parts thereof) are incorporated by reference into the following parts of this Form 10-K: Certain information required in Part III of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K is incorporated from the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART I
Item 1.
Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 2.
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 3.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . .
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . .
Item 9.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and, Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
4
4
40
87
87
87
87
88
88
88
89
100
101
102
102
103
103
103
103
103
103
103
104
104
110
111
i
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to as the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the Exchange Act, that relate to future events or to our future operating or
financial performance. Any forward-looking statement involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from any
future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statement.
Forward-looking statements include statements, other than statements of historical fact, about, among other things:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the progress, number, scope, cost, duration or results of our development activities, nonclinical studies and
clinical trials of elobixibat, A3907, A2342 or any of our other product candidates or programs, such as the
target indication(s) for development or approval, the size, design, population, conduct, cost, objective or
endpoints of any clinical trial, or the timing for initiation or completion of or availability of results from any
clinical trial (including BOLD, our pivotal clinical trial of odevixibat in patients with biliary atresia or
ASSERT, our pivotal trial of odevixibat in Alagille syndrome, or ALGS), for submission, review or
approval of any regulatory filing, access to the Expanded Access Program (EAP) for odevixibat, or for
meeting with regulatory authorities;
the potential benefits that may be derived from any of our product candidates;
the timing of and our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval of our existing product candidates,
any product candidates that we may develop, and any related restrictions, limitations, or warnings in the
label of any approved product candidates;
any payment that EA Pharma Co., Ltd., or EA Pharma, may make to us or any other action or decision that
EA Pharma may make concerning elobixibat or our business relationship;
the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business operations or financial condition;
our future operations, financial position, revenues, costs, expenses, uses of cash, capital requirements, our
need for additional financing or the period for which our existing cash resources will be sufficient to meet
our operating requirements; or
our strategies, prospects, plans, expectations, forecasts or objectives.
Words such as, but not limited to, “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “intend,” “may,”
“plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “targets,” “likely,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “continue,” “scheduled”
and similar expressions or phrases, or the negative of those expressions or phrases, are intended to identify forward-
looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Although we believe
that we have a reasonable basis for each forward-looking statement contained in this report, we caution you that these
statements are based on our estimates or projections of the future that are subject to known and unknown risks and
uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or
achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statement. The description of
our Business set forth in Item 1, the Risk Factors set forth in Item 1A and our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in Item 7, as well as other sections in this report, discuss some of
the factors that could contribute to these differences.
1
Actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or
implied by any forward-looking statement as a result of various important factors, including our critical accounting
policies and risks and uncertainties relating, among other things, to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the design, size, duration and endpoints for, and results from BOLD, our pivotal trial of odevixibat in biliary
atresia, and ASSERT, our pivotal trial of odevixibat in ALGS, or any other trials that will be required to
obtain marketing approval for odevixibat to treat patients with PFIC, biliary atresia, ALGS or any other
pediatric cholestatic liver disease or for A3907 and A2342 as potential treatments for adult liver and viral
diseases;
whether favorable findings from clinical trials of odevixibat to date, including findings in our completed
Phase 3 clinical trial in PFIC and findings in indications other than PFIC, will be predictive of results from
future clinical trials, including our pivotal trial of odevixibat in biliary atresia and our pivotal trial of
odevixibat in ALGS; whether either or both of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and
European Medicines Agency, or EMA, will determine that the primary endpoint and treatment duration of
our completed Phase 3 trial in patients with PFIC are sufficient, even if such primary endpoint is met with
statistical significance, to support approval of odevixibat in the United States or the European Union, to treat
PFIC, a symptom of PFIC, a specific PFIC subtype(s) or otherwise; and whether either agency will complete
their respective reviews within the target timelines, including the FDA’s Prescription Drug User Fee Act
goal date of July 20, 2021, as a potential result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise;
the outcome and interpretation by regulatory authorities of an ongoing third-party study pooling and
analyzing long-term PFIC patient data;
the timing for initiation or completion of, or for availability of data from, our pivotal trial of odevixibat in
biliary atresia and our pivotal trial of odevixibat in ALGS, and the outcomes of such trials;
delays or other challenges in the recruitment of patients for the pivotal trial of odevixibat in biliary atresia
and the pivotal trial of odevixibat in ALGS;
whether odevixibat will meet the criteria to receive a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher from the
FDA when applicable, whether a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher that we may receive in the
future for odevixibat, if any, will be valuable to us, and, if necessary, whether the rare pediatric disease
priority review voucher program will be renewed beyond 2026;
the COVID-19 pandemic, which may negatively impact the conduct of, and the timing of initiation,
enrollment, completion and reporting with respect to, our clinical trials; negatively impact the supply of drug
product for our clinical and preclinical programs; and/or result in other adverse impacts on our business;
the competitive environment and commercial opportunity for a potential treatment for PFIC and other
orphan pediatric cholestatic liver diseases;
the conduct and results of clinical trials and nonclinical studies and assessments of odevixibat, A3907,
A2342 or any of our other product candidates and programs, including the performance of third parties
engaged to execute them and difficulties or delays in patient enrollment and data analysis;
the medical benefit that may be derived from odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or any of our other product
candidates;
the extent to which our agreement with EA Pharma for elobixibat generates nondilutive income for us;
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the timing and success of submission, acceptance and approval of regulatory filings and any related
restrictions, limitations or warnings in the label of any approved product candidates;
the significant control or influence that EA Pharma has over the commercialization of elobixibat in Japan
and the development and commercialization of elobixibat in EA Pharma’s other licensed territories;
whether we elect to seek and, if so, our ability to establish a license or other partnering transaction with a
third party for elobixibat in the United States or Europe;
the accuracy of our estimates regarding expenses, costs, future revenues, uses of cash and capital
requirements;
our ability to obtain additional financing on reasonable terms, or at all;
our ability to establish additional licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements on favorable terms and our
ability to attract collaborators with development, regulatory and commercialization expertise;
the success of competing third-party products or product candidates;
our ability to successfully commercialize any approved product candidates, including their rate and degree of
market acceptance;
whether we are able to maintain compliance with the terms and conditions of our loan and security
agreement with Hercules Capital, Inc.;
our ability to expand and protect our intellectual property estate;
regulatory developments in the United States and other countries;
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting;
the performance of our third-party suppliers, manufacturers and contract research organizations and our
ability to obtain alternative sources of raw materials;
our ability to attract and retain key personnel; and
our ability to comply with regulatory requirements relating to our business, and the costs of compliance with
those requirements, including those on data privacy and security.
These and other risks and uncertainties are described in greater detail under the caption “Risk Factors” in Item 1A
of Part I of this report and in other filings that we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. As a
result of the risks and uncertainties, the results or events indicated by the forward-looking statements may not occur. We
caution you not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement.
In addition, any forward-looking statement in this Annual Report on Form 10-K represents our views only as of
the filing date of this annual report and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date.
We anticipate that subsequent events and developments may cause our views to change. Although we may elect to
update these forward-looking statements publicly at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to
do so, except as required by applicable law. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any
future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments we may make.
3
PART I
All brand names or trademarks appearing in this report are the property of their respective holders. Use or
display by us of other parties’ trademarks, trade dress, or products in this report is not intended to, and does not, imply
a relationship with, or endorsements or sponsorship of, us by the trademark or trade dress owners. Unless the context
requires otherwise, references in this report to “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Albireo Pharma, Inc. and its direct and
indirect subsidiaries.
Item 1.
BUSINESS
Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of novel bile acid
modulators to treat orphan pediatric liver diseases and other liver or gastrointestinal diseases and disorders. We are
pursuing the development of our lead product candidate, odevixibat (formerly known as A4250), for patients with
progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis, or PFIC, a rare, life-threatening genetic disorder affecting young children
for which there is currently no approved drug treatment. In September 2020, we announced topline results from our
Phase 3 trial in PFIC, and in December 2020, we announced that we submitted a new drug application, or NDA, to the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and a marketing authorization application, or MAA, to the European
Medicines Agency, or EMA, seeking approval of odevixibat for the treatment of patients with PFIC, in anticipation of
potential regulatory approval, issuance of a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher and commercial launch in the
second half of 2021. In January 2021 we announced the FDA accepted our NDA for odevixibat for the treatment of
patients with PFIC, which was submitted in November 2020, with priority review and a user fee goal date under the
Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) of July 20, 2021. We are also pursuing the development of odevixibat in
biliary atresia and in Alagille syndrome, or ALGS, each of which is a rare, life threatening disease that affects the liver
and for which there is no approved pharmacologic treatment option. We initiated a pivotal clinical trial of odevixibat in
biliary atresia, the BOLD trial, in the first half of 2020, and continue to enroll patients in the trial. We expect topline
results from the BOLD trial in 2024. We also initiated a pivotal trial of odevixibat in ALGS, the ASSERT trial, in the
fourth quarter of 2020. We expect topline results from the ASSERT trial in 2022. Our most advanced product candidate
in addition to odevixibat is elobixibat, which is approved in Japan for the treatment of chronic constipation. In
August 2020, we announced topline results from our Phase 2 clinical trial as a treatment for nonalcoholic fatty liver
disease, or NAFLD, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, or NASH, and based on the results of the trial, we decided not to
pursue further development of elobixibat in NAFLD or NASH. We also have a preclinical program in adult liver and
viral diseases. Our lead preclinical candidate for adult liver diseases, A3907, is a selective inhibitor of the apical sodium-
dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) that has, based on animal studies, high predicted systemic bioavailability in man.
As a result, A3907 has the potential to not only affect the bile acid pool by increased bile acid excretion in the stools but
also through other pathways, including increased urinary bile acid excretion. This unique approach may yield greater
dosing flexibility, greater efficacy and lower rates of adverse events associated with the category, such as diarrhea. We
have completed IND enabling studies for A3907, plan to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial in adult liver disease in the first
half of 2021 and expect topline results in 2021. Our lead candidate for adult viral and liver diseases is A2342, an oral
systemic sodium-taurocholate co-transporting peptide, or NTCP inhibitor, which is a potent small molecule that blocks
entry of bile acids into the liver. We plan to complete IND enabling studies with A2342 this year. Preclinical efforts with
other bile acid modulator approaches continue.
Odevixibat —our lead product candidate for PFIC.
In September 2020, we announced topline results from PEDFIC 1, our Phase 3 clinical trial for odevixibat, given
once per day as an oral capsule or sprinkled over food, in children ages 6 months to 18 years with PFIC types 1 and 2,
which was conducted at 45 global sites. PEDFIC 1 tested two doses of odevixibat, 40 µg/kg/day and 120 µg/kg/day,
along with placebo, over a treatment period of 24 weeks. PEDFIC 1, met its two primary endpoints, demonstrating that
odevixibat reduced serum bile acid responses, or sBAs, (p=0.003) and improved pruritus assessments (p=0.004) with a
single digit diarrhea rate. In the primary analysis, PEDFIC 1 met the U.S regulatory primary endpoint with the
proportion of positive pruritus assessments being 53.5% in the odevixibat arms compared to 28.7% in the placebo arm
(p=0.004). As a secondary endpoint, 42.9% of patients in the odevixibat arms had a clinically meaningful improvement
4
in the pruritus score, defined as a drop from baseline of 1.0 point or more on the 0-4 point scale, at week 24 compared to
10.5% in the placebo arm (p=0.018). PEDFIC 1 also met the E.U. regulatory primary endpoint with 33.3% of subjects in
the odevixibat arms experiencing either a 70% reduction in sBAs or reaching a level of 70 µmol/L compared to no
patients in the placebo arm (p=0.003). As an E.U. regulatory secondary endpoint, mean reduction of bile acids was
114.3 µmol/L in the odevixibat arms compared to an increase of 13.1 µmol/L in the placebo arm (p=0.002). Both doses
of odevixibat were statistically significant for each of the U.S. and E.U. primary endpoints. Odevixibat was well
tolerated, with an overall adverse event incidence similar to placebo. There were no drug-related serious adverse events,
or SAEs, reported during the study. Diarrhea/frequent bowel movements were the most common treatment-related
gastrointestinal adverse events, which occurred in 9.5% of odevixibat treated patients vs. 5.0% of placebo patients. In
December 2020, we announced that we submitted an NDA to the FDA and an MAA to the EMA seeking approval of
odevixibat for the treatment of PFIC, which affirms our eligibility to apply for a rare pediatric disease priority review
voucher. In January 2021 we announced the FDA accepted our NDA for odevixibat for the treatment of patients with
PFIC, with priority review and a user fee goal date under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) of July 20, 2021.
In June 2018, the FDA granted a rare pediatric disease designation to odevixibat for the treatment of PFIC, and we
applied for a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher in connection with the submission of our NDA in
November 2020. In September 2018, the FDA granted fast track designation to odevixibat for the treatment of pruritus
associated with PFIC. In July 2020, we initiated an Expanded Access Program (EAP) for odevixibat in the United States,
Canada, Australia and Europe.
PEDFIC 2, our long term, open label extension study, includes a cohort of patients who completed 24 weeks in
PEDFIC 1 or moved into PEDFIC 2 after 12 weeks in PEDFIC 1, as well as an additional cohort of PFIC patients who
were not eligible for PEDFIC 1. Patients in PEDFIC 2 receive odevixibat 120 µg/kg once per day over 72 weeks.
Primary outcome measures in PEDFIC 2 are change in pruritus as indexed by caregiver reported observed scratching
using our proprietary PRUCISION instrument, and change in sBAs, in each case from baseline over 72 weeks. In
November 2020, we announced interim results from 69 patients through 24 weeks of treatment in PEDFIC 2 that show
that the reductions in sBAs and/or pruritus observed in patients receiving odevixibat in PEDFIC 1 was maintained or
increased during continued odevixibat treatment in PEDFIC 2. For patients who were treatment naïve to odevixibat
(patients who received placebo in PEDFIC 1 or patients who enrolled directly into PEDFIC 2), reductions in sBAs and
pruritus were similar to those observed during odevixibat treatment in PEDFIC 1. Continued treatment with odevixibat
in PEDFIC 2 resulted in increased growth rates and catch-up growth in children with PFIC. Four patients with PFIC
type 3 enrolled into PEDFIC 2 and had 12 weeks of data available at the time of the interim data cut; reductions in both
sBAs and pruritus were also observed in these patients. No deaths or treatment related serious adverse events had been
reported in PEDFIC 2 at the time of the interim data cut as of July 15, 2020. Odevixibat was generally well tolerated;
diarrhea was reported in 10.1% of patients, all mild or moderate in severity.
The precise prevalence of PFIC is unknown, and we are not aware of any patient registries or other method of
establishing with precision the actual number of patients with PFIC in any geography. PFIC has been estimated to affect
between one in every 75,000 children born worldwide. Based on the published incidence, published regional
populations, and estimated median life expectancies, we estimate the prevalence of PFIC across the spectrum of the
disease to be approximately 15,000 patients worldwide, not including China and India, but we are not able to estimate
the prevalence of PFIC with precision. We hold global rights to odevixibat unencumbered. Our current plan is to
commercialize odevixibat ourselves in the United States and Europe, we have entered into license agreements with a
partner in Israel and we are identifying potential partners for other regions. There are currently no drugs approved for the
treatment of PFIC. First-line treatment for PFIC is typically off-label ursodeoxycholic acid, or UDCA, which is
approved in France only for PFIC type 3, and in the United States and elsewhere for the treatment of primary biliary
cholangitis, or PBC. However, many PFIC patients do not respond well to UDCA, undergo partial external bile
diversion, or PEBD, surgery and often require liver transplantation. PEBD surgery is a life-altering and undesirable
procedure in which bile is drained outside the body to a stoma bag that must be worn by the patient 24 hours a day.
Other indications under development for odevixibat.
We are also pursuing the development of odevixibat in patients with biliary atresia, another rare, life-threatening
disease that affects the liver and for which there is no approved pharmacologic treatment option. In December 2018, the
European Commission granted orphan designation to odevixibat for the treatment of biliary atresia, and in January 2019,
5
the FDA granted orphan drug designation to odevixibat for the treatment of biliary atresia. We initiated the BOLD
clinical trial, a global pivotal trial and the largest prospective intervention trial ever conducted in biliary atresia, in the
first half of 2020. The first patients have been enrolled in the trial, and we plan for full site activation in the first half of
2021, subject to any potential impacts of COVID-19 on the ability of sites to complete required activities. We expect
topline results from the BOLD trial in 2024. We believe biliary atresia is one of the most common rare pediatric liver
diseases, and is the leading cause of liver transplants in children. Our double-blind, placebo controlled pivotal trial in
biliary atresia is designed to enroll approximately 200 patients at 70 sites globally. Patients will receive either placebo or
high-dose (120µg/kg) odevixibat once daily. The primary endpoint is survival with native liver after two years of
treatment.
Biliary atresia is a partial or total blocking or absence of large bile ducts that causes cholestasis and resulting
accumulation of bile that damages the liver. The estimated worldwide incidence of biliary atresia is between 6 and 10 for
every 100,000 live births. We estimate the prevalence of biliary atresia to be approximately 18,100 patients across the
U.S. and Europe, and approximately 27,000 combined in other jurisdictions worldwide, but we are not able to estimate
the prevalence of biliary atresia with precision. There are currently no drugs approved for the treatment of biliary atresia.
The current standard of care is a surgery known as the Kasai procedure, or hepatoportoenterostomy, in which the
obstructed bile ducts are removed and a section of the small intestine is connected to the liver directly. However, only an
estimated 25% of those initially undergoing the Kasai procedure will survive to their twenties without need for liver
transplantation.
In addition, we initiated a pivotal trial of odevixibat in ALGS, the ASSERT trial, in the fourth quarter of 2020. The
trial is expected to enroll approximately 45 patients aged 0 to 17 years of age with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of
ALGS across 35 sites in North America, Europe, Middle East and Asia Pacific. We plan for full site activation in the
first half of 2021, subject to any potential impacts of COVID-19 on the ability of sites to complete required activities.
We expect topline data to be available in 2022, before the announcement of the topline results from the BOLD trial.
ALGS is a genetic condition associated with liver, heart, eye, kidney and skeletal abnormalities. In particular, ALGS
patients have fewer than normal bile ducts inside the liver, which leads to cholestasis and the accumulation of bile and
causes scarring in the liver. ALGS is estimated to affect between one in every 50,000 children born worldwide. We
estimate the prevalence of ALGS to be approximately 11,700 patients across the U.S. and Europe, and approximately
13,000 combined in other jurisdictions worldwide, but we are not able to estimate the prevalence of ALGS with
precision. There are currently no drugs approved for the treatment of ALGS. Current treatment for ALGS is generally in
line with current treatments for PFIC as described above. In August 2012, the European Commission granted orphan
designation to odevixibat for the treatment of ALGS. In October 2018, the FDA granted orphan drug designation to
odevixibat for the treatment of ALGS.
We continue to evaluate potential clinical development in other indications, including primary sclerosing
cholangitis, which refers to swelling (inflammation), scarring, and destruction of bile ducts inside and outside of the
liver. The first symptoms are typically fatigue, itching and jaundice, and many patients with sclerosing cholangitis also
suffer from inflammatory bowel disease. The estimated incidence of primary sclerosing cholangitis is 9 cases per
100,000 people. There are currently no drugs approved for the treatment of sclerosing cholangitis. First-line treatment is
typically off-label UDCA, although UDCA has not been established to be safe and effective in patients with sclerosing
cholangitis in well controlled clinical trials.
Our Corporate History
Prior to November 3, 2016, we were a specialty biopharmaceutical company known as Biodel Inc. that historically
had been focused on the development and commercialization of innovative treatments for diabetes. Biodel was originally
incorporated in the State of Delaware in December 2003 under the name “Global Positioning Group, Ltd.” and
subsequently changed its name to “Biodel Inc.” Albireo Limited was formed in connection with a spinout transaction
from AstraZeneca AB in 2008 in which AstraZeneca assigned to Albireo AB all of its rights in and to its portfolio of
IBAT inhibitors, including elobixibat and odevixibat, as well as other programs that are currently at a preclinical stage.
6
On November 3, 2016, we completed a share exchange transaction with Biodel Inc, pursuant to an Amended and
Restated Share Exchange Agreement dated July 13, 2016 that we entered into with Albireo Limited and the shareholders
and noteholders of Albireo Limited. As a result, Albireo Limited became a wholly owned subsidiary of Biodel, Biodel’s
corporate name was changed to Albireo Pharma, Inc. and the business of Albireo Limited became our business.
The Role of Bile Acids and IBAT
The liver is responsible for many vital body functions, including the regulation of bile acid synthesis and
metabolism. The liver uses cholesterol to produce bile acids, which are then transported to, and stored in, the gall
bladder. In response to food ingestion, the gall bladder contracts and releases bile acids into the small intestine where
they promote digestion and absorption of dietary fats and fat soluble vitamins A, D, E and K.
After completing digestion, bile acids bind to IBAT, which is sometimes referred to as the apical sodium bile acid
transporter, or ASBT, at a location at the end of the small intestine known as the terminal ileum. As depicted below,
IBAT then initiates the transport of bile acids across the intestinal wall through the portal vein back to the liver in the
enterohepatic circulation process.
In healthy persons, approximately 95% of bile acids recirculate back to the liver, with the remainder being
excreted to the colon. The liver produces a small amount of new bile acids every day to make up for this loss.
In addition to their role in digestion, bile acids are important signaling molecules that help regulate a network of
metabolic pathways throughout the GI system. Bile acids bind to receptors in the colon that promote the release of
intestinal hormones, such as glucagon-like peptide-1, or GLP-1, that can stimulate insulin release from the pancreas and,
over time, decrease levels of plasma hemoglobin A1c, or HbA1c, a measure of glucose. In the liver, bile acids bind to
other receptors that regulate bile acid production from cholesterol. Under normal conditions, bile acids bind to these
receptors and inhibit the synthesis of new bile acids. As bile acid levels are lowered, the liver produces needed bile acids
from cholesterol, which requires increased uptake of cholesterol and results in the decrease of cholesterol levels in the
liver and otherwise in circulation in the body.
Cholestatic liver disease results in the accumulation of elevated bile acids in the liver and in the serum. Elevated
bile acid levels are linked with progressive liver disease. In addition, although a direct causative correlation has not been
definitely established, there is substantial clinical support linking elevated serum bile acids to pruritus, a challenging
symptom impacting patients with cholestatic liver disease.
7
Interruption of enterohepatic circulation in patients with PFIC or ALGS surgically via the partial external biliary
diversion, or PEBD, procedure has been shown to lower serum bile acid levels, relieve pruritus, improve clinical
outcomes and delay the progression of serious liver disease. Odevixibat is designed to treat PFIC and other cholestatic
liver diseases pharmacologically by inhibiting IBAT to reduce bile acids in the liver and serum, while at the same time
reducing pruritus. In addition to the beneficial effects that may be achievable through IBAT inhibition, odevixibat is
minimally absorbed into the bloodstream, resulting in minimal systemic exposure of the drug to the body.
Our Strategy
Our goal is to be a leader in the development and commercialization of novel therapeutics for orphan pediatric
cholestatic liver diseases and disorders where there is high unmet medical need, while also leveraging our expertise in
bile acid modulation to treat other liver and GI diseases and disorders. To achieve our goal, we intend to pursue the
following strategies.
•
Rapidly develop odevixibat to regulatory approval to treat patients with PFIC. We have announced results
from our Phase 3 clinical trial in patients with PFIC, which we refer to as PEDFIC 1. It is our objective that
PEDFIC 1, together with available data from PEDFIC 2, our long-term, open label extension study, forms
the primary support for applications for marketing approval of odevixibat in both the United States and
Europe, which were submitted in November 2020, as well as other key markets outside those jurisdictions.
The EMA granted accelerated assessment to our MAA, and the FDA accepted our NDA with priority review
and a user fee goal date under PDUFA of July 20, 2021.
• Maximize the benefit and commercial potential of odevixibat by expanding development to additional
orphan pediatric cholestatic indications. Although we have chosen PFIC as our lead indication for
odevixibat, we also believe odevixibat can benefit children suffering from other cholestatic diseases and
disorders. We initiated a pivotal clinical trial with odevixibat for the treatment of biliary atresia, the BOLD
trial, in the first half of 2020 and continue to enroll patients in the trial. We estimate that biliary atresia
impacts an aggregate of 18,100 patients in the United States and Europe, with another 27,000 patients in
other jurisdictions worldwide, and is the cause of over 50% of liver transplants in children. We also initiated
a pivotal trial for odevixibat as a treatment for ALGS, the ASSERT trial, in the fourth quarter of 2020.
•
•
Develop the capability to commercialize odevixibat to treat orphan pediatric liver diseases, if approved,
through a targeted sales force in the United States and Europe and collaborate selectively to
commercialize odevixibat outside of these regions. If we receive marketing approval in the United States or
Europe for odevixibat to treat patients with PFIC or any other pediatric cholestatic liver disease or disorder,
we plan to build the capabilities to effectively commercialize odevixibat in the approved indication(s) in the
applicable region. We believe that the required commercial organization would be modest in size and
targeted to the relatively small number of specialists in the United States and Europe who treat children with
cholestatic liver disease. If we receive marketing approval outside of the United States and Europe for
odevixibat to treat patients with PFIC or any other pediatric cholestatic liver disease or disorder, we plan to
selectively utilize collaboration, distribution and other marketing arrangements with third parties to
commercialize odevixibat in the approved indication(s) in the regions or markets where we receive approval.
We have entered into a Co-Promotion Agreement with Travere Therapeutics, Inc. for the co-promotion of
odevixibat in the United States. The initial term of the arrangement is two years from launch of odevixibat,
terminable at will by either party after one year following launch.
Collaborate selectively to develop and commercialize product candidates targeting nonorphan indications,
potentially including any future product candidate to treat adult liver diseases. We intend to selectively
seek alliances and collaborations to assist us in furthering the development or commercialization of product
candidates targeting large primary care markets that must be served by large sales and marketing
organizations. These product candidates may include A3907, A2342 and any potential future product
candidate that arises from our preclinical program in adult liver diseases.
8
Our Pipeline
Odevixibat
In September 2020, we announced topline results from our Phase 3 trial in PFIC, and in November 2020, we
announced that we submitted an NDA to the FDA and an MAA to the EMA, seeking approval of odevixibat for the
treatment of patients with PFIC, in anticipation of potential regulatory approval, issuance of a rare pediatric disease
priority review voucher and commercial launch in the second half of 2021. In January 2021, we announced the FDA
accepted our NDA, which was submitted in November 2020, and granted priority review with a user fee goal date under
PDUFA of July 20, 2021. PEDFIC 2, our ongoing long term, open label extension study to evaluate long-term outcomes,
includes a cohort of patients who completed 24 weeks in PEDFIC 1 or moved into PEDFIC 2 after 12 weeks in PEDFIC
1, as well as an additional cohort of PFIC patients who were not eligible for PEDFIC 1.In addition to PFIC, we initiated
a pivotal clinical trial in biliary atresia in the first half of 2020 and a pivotal trial for odevixibat as a treatment for ALGS
in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Odevixibat is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of IBAT that is designed to reduce bile acid reabsorption from
the small intestine to the liver, and therefore reduce levels of bile acids in the serum and liver and increase excretion of
bile acids via the colon. We believe that reducing liver and serum bile acid levels may reduce bile acid-related liver
damage to improve liver function and alleviate symptoms of PFIC and other cholestatic liver diseases, including
pruritus. Moreover, at therapeutic doses, odevixibat has minimal systemic exposure, acts locally in the gut and, based on
preclinical testing, appears to be excreted substantially intact in the feces, which may reduce the risk of systemic side
effects and undesirable drug-drug interactions compared with drugs that have broad distribution in the body. Odevixibat
has been granted orphan drug designation for PFIC, PBC, biliary atresia and ALGS in the United States and the
European Union.
Lead Indication for Odevixibat
PFIC. PFIC is our lead indication for odevixibat. PFIC is a rare genetic disorder that causes progressive, life-
threatening liver disease, which may start early after birth or at a young age and rapidly progress to end-stage liver
disease. PFIC is commonly associated with elevated serum bile acids. Prominent symptoms of PFIC include pruritus,
which is associated with severe sleep disturbance and diminished overall quality of life, and poor growth. First-line
treatment in PFIC is typically off-label UDCA, which is approved in France only for PFIC type 3. UDCA is itself a type
of bile acid that is thought to act by diluting the toxic effects in the liver and bile ducts of a different type of bile acids,
known as hydrophobic bile acids, which are often elevated in cholestatic liver disease. Third-party retrospective analyses
published in 2009 and 2010 indicate that, following treatment with UDCA, many PFIC patients require PEBD surgery
and PFIC patients will often ultimately require liver transplantation. Although success rates vary, published third-party
9
studies have shown that PEBD surgery can slow and, in some cases, stop the progression of liver disease and lead to
reduced pruritus and improved sleep. We believe these outcomes validate our approach of reducing liver and serum bile
acids with an IBAT inhibitor such as odevixibat to treat PFIC.
The precise prevalence of PFIC is unknown, and we are not aware of any patient registries or other method of
establishing with precision the actual number of patients with PFIC in any geography. PFIC has been estimated to affect
between one in every 75,000 children born worldwide. Based on the published incidence, published regional
populations, and estimated median life expectancies, we estimate the prevalence of PFIC across the spectrum of the
disease to be approximately 15,000 patients worldwide, not including China and India, but we are not able to estimate
the prevalence of PFIC with precision. We hold global rights to odevixibat unencumbered. Our current plan is to
commercialize odevixibat ourselves in the United States and Europe, we have entered into license agreements with a
partner in Israel and are identifying potential partners for other regions. There are currently no drugs approved for the
treatment of PFIC. First-line treatment for PFIC is typically off-label ursodeoxycholic acid, or UDCA, which is
approved in France only for PFIC type 3, and in the United States and elsewhere for the treatment of primary biliary
cholangitis, or PBC. However, many PFIC patients do not respond well to UDCA, undergo partial external bile
diversion, or PEBD, surgery and often require liver transplantation. PEBD surgery is a life-altering and undesirable
procedure in which bile is drained outside the body to a stoma bag that must be worn by the patient 24 hours a day.
Three alternative gene defects have been identified that correlate to three separate PFIC subtypes, known as types 1, 2
and 3.
PFIC, type 1, which is sometimes referred to as “Byler disease” or “FIC1 deficiency,” is caused by impaired bile
secretion due to mutations in the ATP8B1 gene that result in an imbalance of molecules known as phospholipids that is
associated with cholestasis and elevated bile acids in the liver. Children affected by PFIC, type 1 usually develop
cholestasis in the first months of life and, in the absence of surgical treatment, progress to cirrhosis and end-stage liver
disease before the end of the first decade of life. PFIC, type 1 is especially common in the Old Order Amish population
in the United States, as well as the Inuit population of Greenland.
•
•
PFIC, type 2, which is sometimes referred to as “Byler syndrome” or “BSEP deficiency,” is caused by
impaired bile salt secretion due to mutations in the ABCB11 gene that result in the buildup of bile salts in
liver cells. Children with PFIC, type 2 often develop liver failure within the first few years of life and are at
increased risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma, the most common form of liver cancer.
PFIC, type 3, which typically presents in the first years of childhood with progressive cholestasis, is caused
by mutations in the ABCB4 gene. Mutations in the ABCB4 gene lead to a lack of phospholipids available to
bind to bile acids, resulting in a buildup of bile acids that damages liver cells.
The TJP2 gene, NR1H4 gene or Myo5b gene mutations have also been proposed to be causes of PFIC. In addition,
some patients with PFIC do not have a mutation in any of the ATP8B1, ABCB11, ABCB4, TJP2, NR1H4 or Myo5b
genes. In these cases, the cause of the condition is unknown.
Biliary Atresia Indication for Odevixibat
Biliary atresia. Biliary atresia is a partial or total blocking or absence of large bile ducts that irreversibly prevents
bile flow from the liver to the small intestine, causing cholestasis and resulting accumulation of bile that damages the
liver. The damage leads to scarring, loss of liver tissue and cirrhosis, which makes it difficult for the liver to remove
toxins from the blood and deteriorates the liver. Biliary atresia is life threatening.
There are currently no drugs approved for the treatment of biliary atresia. The current standard of care is the Kasai
procedure. The chance of a successful Kasai procedure is highest if performed before a patient is two months of age.
However, even with early intervention, scarring of the liver can continue, resulting in cirrhosis and eventually the need
for transplantation. Only an estimated 25% of those initially undergoing the Kasai procedure will survive to their
twenties without need for liver transplantation.
10
The estimated worldwide incidence of biliary atresia is between 6 and 10 for every 100,000 live births. Of all
biliary atresia patients, we believe odevixibat will primarily benefit those who have undergone a Kasai procedure that
has been sufficiently successful to obviate the need for liver transplant within the first year of life. We estimate the
prevalence of biliary atresia to be approximately 18,100 patients across the U.S. and Europe, and 27,000 combined in
other jurisdictions worldwide, but we are not able to estimate the prevalence of biliary atresia with precision.
The exact cause of biliary atresia is unknown, but it is thought to result from an event in the womb around the time
of birth. Possible triggers may include viral or bacterial infection, an immune system malfunction, a genetic mutation, a
problem during liver or bile duct development or exposure to toxic substances. In January 2019, the FDA granted orphan
designation to odevixibat for the treatment of biliary atresia. The European Commission granted orphan drug designation
to odevixibat for the treatment of biliary atresia in December of 2018. We initiated the BOLD clinical trial, a global
pivotal trial in biliary atresia, in the first half of 2020. Our double-blind, placebo controlled pivotal trial is designed to
enroll approximately 200 patients at 70 sites globally. Patients will receive either placebo or 120µg/kg odevixibat once
daily. The primary endpoint is survival with native liver after two years of treatment. The first patients have been
enrolled in the trial, and we plan for full site activation in the first half of 2021, subject to any potential impacts of
COVID-19 on the ability of sites to complete required activities. We anticipate having topline results available from this
trial in 2024.
ALGS. ALGS is a genetic condition associated with liver, heart, eye, kidney and skeletal abnormalities. In
particular, ALGS patients have fewer than normal bile ducts inside the liver, which leads to cholestasis and the
accumulation of bile and causes scarring in the liver. Symptoms include jaundice, pruritus, poor growth and specific
facial features and typically develop in the first two years of life.
We estimate the prevalence of ALGS to be approximately 11,700 patients across the U.S. and Europe, and
approximately 13,000 combined in other jurisdictions worldwide, but we are not able to estimate the prevalence of
ALGS with precision. There are currently no drugs approved for the treatment of ALGS. Current treatments for ALGS
are generally in line with current treatments for PFIC as described above, including off-label UDCA, PEBD surgery and,
where liver disease is advanced, liver transplantation.
The estimated worldwide incidence of ALGS is one in every 50,000 newborns born worldwide. ALGS is
predominately caused by mutations in a gene called Jagged1. In a small number of cases, ALGS results from mutations
in a gene called Notch2. In October 2018, the FDA granted orphan drug designation to odevixibat for the treatment of
ALGS. In the fourth quarter of 2020, we initiated the ASSERT global pivotal trial for odevixibat as a treatment for
ALGS. We plan for full site activation in the first half of 2021, subject to any potential impacts of COVID-19 on the
ability of sites to complete required activities. We expect topline data to be available in 2022, before the announcement
of the topline results from the BOLD clinical trial.
Potential Additional Target Indications for Odevixibat
Primary Sclerosing cholangitis. Primary sclerosing cholangitis refers to swelling (inflammation), scarring, and
destruction of bile ducts inside and outside of the liver. The first symptoms are typically fatigue, itching and jaundice,
and many patients with sclerosing cholangitis also suffer from inflammatory bowel disease. The estimated incidence of
primary sclerosing cholangitis is 9 cases per 100,000 people. There are currently no drugs approved for the treatment of
sclerosing cholangitis. First-line treatment is typically off-label UDCA, although UDCA has not been established to be
safe and effective in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis in well controlled clinical trials.
Development of Odevixibat
Phase 3 Clinical Program in Patients with PFIC
In September 2020, we announced topline results from PEDFIC 1, our Phase 3 clinical trial for odevixibat, given
once per day as an oral capsule or sprinkled over food, in patients ages 6 months to 18 years with PFIC types 1 and 2,
which was conducted at 33 global sites. PEDFIC 1 tested two doses of odevixibat, 40 µg/kg/day and 120 µg/kg/day,
11
along with placebo, over a treatment period of 24 weeks. PEDFIC 1, met its two primary endpoints, demonstrating that
odevixibat reduced serum bile acid responses, or sBAs, (p=0.003) and improved pruritus assessments (p=0.004) with a
single digit diarrhea rate. In the primary analysis, PEDFIC 1 met the U.S. regulatory primary endpoint with the
proportion of positive pruritus assessments being 53.5% in the odevixibat arms compared to 28.7% in the placebo arm
(p=0.004). As a secondary endpoint, 42.9% of patients in the odevixibat arms had a clinically meaningful improvement
in the pruritus score, defined as a drop from baseline of 1.0 point or more on the 0-4 point scale, at week 24 compared to
10.5% in the placebo arm (p=0.018). PEDFIC 1 also met the E.U. regulatory primary endpoint with 33.3% of subjects in
the odevixibat arms experiencing either a 70% reduction in sBAs or reaching a level of 70 µmol/L compared to no
patients in the placebo arm (p=0.003). As an E.U. regulatory secondary endpoint, mean reduction of bile acids was 114.3
µmol/L in the odevixibat arms compared to an increase of 13.1 µmol/L in the placebo arm (p=0.002). Both doses of
odevixibat were statistically significant for each of the U.S. and E.U. primary endpoints. Odevixibat was well tolerated,
with an overall adverse event incidence similar to placebo. There were no drug-related serious adverse events, or SAEs,
reported during the study. Diarrhea/frequent bowel movements were the most common treatment-related gastrointestinal
adverse events, which occurred in 9.5% of odevixibat treated patients vs. 5.0% of placebo patients. In November 2020,
we submitted an NDA to the FDA and an MAA to the EMA seeking approval of odevixibat for the treatment of PFIC,
which affirms our eligibility to apply for a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher. In June 2018, the FDA granted
a rare pediatric disease designation to odevixibat for the treatment of PFIC, and in September 2018, the FDA granted fast
track designation to odevixibat for the treatment of pruritus associated with PFIC. In July 2020, we initiated an
Expanded Access Program (EAP) for odevixibat in the United States, Canada, Australia and Europe. In addition, we
applied for a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher in connection with the submission of our NDA for odevixibat
in November of 2020.
PEDFIC 2, our long term, open label extension study, includes a cohort of patients who completed 24 weeks in
PEDFIC 1 or moved into PEDFIC 2 after 12 weeks in PEDFIC 1, as well as an additional cohort of PFIC patients who
were not eligible for PEDFIC 1. Patients in PEDFIC 2 receive odevixibat 120 µg/kg once per day over 72 weeks.
Primary outcome measures in PEDFIC 2 are change in pruritus as indexed by caregiver reported observed scratching
using our proprietary PRUCISION instrument, and change in sBAs, in each case from baseline over 72 weeks. Interim
data from 69 patients through 24 weeks of treatment in PEDFIC 2 was presented at the November 2020 AASLD. The
interim results show that the reductions in sBAs and/or pruritus observed in patients receiving odevixibat in PEDFIC 1
was maintained or increased during continued odevixibat treatment in PEDFIC 2. For patients who were treatment naïve
to odevixibat (patients who received placebo in PEDFIC 1 or patients who enrolled directly into PEDFIC 2), reductions
in sBAs and pruritus were similar to those observed during odevixibat treatment in PEDFIC 1. Continued treatment with
odevixibat in PEDFIC 2 resulted in increased growth rates and catch-up growth in children with PFIC. Four patients
with PFIC type 3 enrolled into PEDFIC 2 and had 12 weeks of data available at the time of the interim data cut;
reductions in both sBAs and pruritus were also observed in these patients. No deaths or treatment related serious adverse
events had been reported in PEDFIC 2 at the time of the interim data cut as of July 15, 2020. Odevixibat was generally
well tolerated; diarrhea was reported in 10.1% of patients, all mild or moderate in severity.
Elobixibat
Our product candidate elobixibat is licensed for the treatment of chronic constipation and other functional diseases
in Japan and other select markets in Asia to EA Pharma. In January 2018, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and
Welfare, or MHLW, approved a new drug application filed by EA Pharma for elobixibat for the treatment of chronic
constipation in Japan. EA Pharma co-markets elobixibat in Japan with another company, Mochida, and co-promotes
elobixibat with Eisai in Japan under the trade name GOOFICE®.
We have commercial rights to elobixibat in the United States, Europe and all other territories not licensed to EA
Pharma. We do not have any current plan to seek a license or other partnering transaction with a third party for
elobixibat for chronic constipation in the United States and Europe. Whether or not we elect to seek such a transaction,
we do not anticipate that we will conduct future clinical trials of elobixibat as a treatment for chronic constipation
independently.
12
Elobixibat is, like odevixibat, an IBAT inhibitor. In August 2020, we announced topline results from our Phase 2
clinical trial as a treatment for NAFLD and NASH and based on the results of the trial, we decided not to pursue further
development of elobixibat in NAFLD or NASH.
Chronic (Idiopathic) Constipation
Though occasional constipation is very common, some people experience chronic constipation that can interfere
with their ability to go about their daily tasks. Pursuant to applicable Rome III diagnostic criteria, two or more of the
following symptoms must be present: straining during at least 25% of defecations, lumpy or hard stools in at least 25%
of defecations, sensation of incomplete evacuation for at least 25% of defecations, sensation of rectal obstruction or
blockage for at least 25% of defecations, use of fingers or other manual maneuvers to facilitate at least 25% of
defecations, and passing fewer than three stools per week. In order to support a diagnosis of constipation, the patient
must rarely have loose stools without the use of laxatives. Further, in order for constipation to be considered chronic,
these criteria must be present for at least three months, with symptom onset at least six months prior to diagnosis. The
Rome III diagnostic criteria are established diagnostic measures for various GI disorders set forth by the Rome
Foundation, a not-for-profit organization based in the United States. The term “idiopathic” indicates that the cause of the
chronic constipation is unknown and not due to any underlying illness or medication.
The current standard of care for constipation is over-the-counter, or OTC, laxatives, which may improve
symptoms of constipation but often exacerbate pain and bloating. Marketed products in Japan that may be prescribed for
chronic constipation include Amitiza (lubiprostone) and Linzess (linaclotide), although linaclotide is approved in Japan
for the treatment of IBS-C.
Preclinical and Early Clinical Development of Elobixibat
Prior to Albireo Limited’s inception in 2008, elobixibat was evaluated by its predecessor owner, AstraZeneca, in
various preclinical studies and Phase 1 single ascending dose and multiple ascending dose clinical trials. In Phase 1
clinical development, elobixibat was generally well tolerated in healthy volunteers and showed minimal systemic
exposure. Subsequently, we conducted a two-year nonclinical carcinogenicity toxicology study that did not result in any
findings of concern and we or our former licensee conducted various additional Phase 1 and early Phase 2 clinical trials
to assess the pharmacokinetics and various effects of elobixibat. Findings from these studies indicated, among other
things, favorable effects of elobixibat on colonic transit and on low-density lipoprotein, or LDL or “bad” cholesterol.
Completed Phase 2b Clinical Trial in the United States
We completed a multicenter, double blind, placebo controlled Phase 2b clinical trial of elobixibat as a treatment
for chronic idiopathic constipation, or CIC, in 2010. We conducted the trial at 45 sites in the United States. Enrollment
criteria included a diagnosis of CIC and meeting specified thresholds for numbers of complete spontaneous bowel
movements, or CSBMs, per week during the two weeks prior to randomization. A spontaneous bowel movement, or
SBM, was defined in the trial as a bowel movement occurring without a laxative, enema or suppository usage in the past
24 hours. A CSBM was defined in the trial as an SBM accompanied by a self-report of complete evacuation.
After a screening period during which patients were taken off laxatives and other excluded medications, patients in
the trial entered a two-week baseline period. Following the baseline period, 190 patients were randomized to receive a
once daily oral tablet dose of one of three doses of elobixibat (5, 10 or 15 mg), or placebo, for eight weeks. Of the
randomized patients, 161 patients completed the trial.
The primary endpoint of the trial was change in number of weekly SBMs from baseline to the first treatment week
for patients who received elobixibat compared with patients who received a placebo. The results demonstrated a dose
response in favor of elobixibat among all three dose groups and were statistically significant in the 10 mg (p < 0.002)
and 15 mg (p < 0.001) dose groups. A clinical trial result is statistically significant if it is unlikely to have occurred by
chance. The statistical significance of a clinical trial result, such as an observed difference between two treatment groups
or cohorts, is determined by a widely used statistical method that establishes the “p”-value of the result. A p-value of
13
0.05 (or less) indicates that there is a 1-in-20 (or less) statistical probability that the clinical trial result occurred by
chance and typically represents statistical significance. If a p-value is above 0.05, the result is generally not considered
statistically significant. The p-value of < 0.002 for the 10 mg elobixibat dose group indicates that there is a less
than 1-in-500 statistical probability that the difference compared with placebo occurred by chance, and the p-value of
< 0.001 for the 15 mg elobixibat dose group indicates that there is a less than 1-in-1,000 statistical probability that the
difference compared with placebo occurred by chance.
Secondary efficacy endpoints of the trial included evaluations of changes in mean weekly number of SBMs and
CSBMs, time to first SBM or CSBM, overall constipation response and reduction in C4 and LDL cholesterol levels. The
10 mg and 15 mg elobixibat doses met all of these secondary endpoints with statistical significance.
All doses of elobixibat were generally well tolerated in the clinical trial. The most frequently reported adverse
events in the trial were abdominal pain and diarrhea, which occurred most often in the highest elobixibat dose group
(abdominal pain: 10.4%, 5 mg elobixibat; 10.6%, 10 mg elobixibat; and 27.1%, 15 mg elobixibat; versus 0% placebo;
and diarrhea: 8.3%, 5 mg elobixibat; 6.4%, 10 mg elobixibat; and 12.5%, 15 mg elobixibat; versus 2.2% placebo). None
of the three SAEs reported in the trial (bleeding colonic diverticulum two weeks after the end of treatment in the 5 mg
elobixibat dose group, breast carcinoma in the 10 mg elobixibat dose group, and shoulder pain in the placebo group) was
considered by the applicable investigator to be related to study drug.
Completed Phase 2b Clinical Trial Conducted by EA Pharma in Japan
Our licensee, EA Pharma, completed a multicenter, double blind, placebo controlled Phase 2b clinical trial of
elobixibat as a treatment for chronic constipation in 2015. Patients in the trial entered the two-week baseline period
during which they were taken off excluded medications. Following the baseline period, patients were randomized to
receive a once daily oral dose of either a low, mid or high dose of elobixibat for two weeks. During the baseline period
and the treatment period, patients reported daily bowel and abdominal symptoms. Of the randomized patients, 154
patients completed the trial.
The primary endpoint of the trial was change in number of weekly SBMs from baseline to the first treatment week
for patients who received elobixibat compared with patients who received a placebo. In the trial, both the mid and high
dose groups of elobixibat showed a highly statistically significant advantage on change from baseline in weekly SBM
frequency compared with placebo (p < 0.001). The findings in favor of elobixibat were substantially the same on a
secondary endpoint of the trial assessing change from baseline in weekly CSBM frequency.
All doses of elobixibat were generally well tolerated in the trial, and no SAEs were reported. As in our completed
Phase 2b clinical trial, the most frequently reported adverse events in the trial were abdominal pain and diarrhea, which
were both assessed by EA Pharma to be typically mild.
Completed Phase 3 Clinical Trial and Long-Term Safety Trial Conducted by EA Pharma in Japan
In October 2016, we announced positive results from a Phase 3 clinical trial of elobixibat as a treatment for
chronic constipation conducted by EA Pharma in Japan. The trial was a multicenter, double blind, placebo controlled
trial in which patients with chronic constipation received a fixed dose of elobixibat or placebo once daily for two weeks.
In the trial, elobixibat met the primary endpoint, which was change in the number of weekly SBMs from baseline to the
first treatment week compared with placebo, with high statistical significance. Elobixibat also met all secondary efficacy
endpoints in the trial assessed statistically, including assessments of change in frequency of CSBMs, time to first SBM,
severity of constipation and stool consistency, with high statistical significance.
There were no SAEs reported in the trial. Consistent with prior clinical trials of elobixibat, the most common
adverse events were abdominal pain (18.8%) and diarrhea (13.0%), all of which were characterized as mild or, in one
case, moderate in severity.
14
EA Pharma also completed a clinical trial designed to evaluate the long-term safety of elobixibat in Japanese
patients with chronic constipation over 52 weeks. The long-term safety trial was a multicenter, open label trial in which
patients with chronic constipation received once daily dosing of elobixibat. In the trial, elobixibat showed a safety and
tolerability profile consistent overall with prior clinical trials of elobixibat in Japan.
Phase 3 Clinical Trials Conducted by a Former Licensee
Two Phase 3 clinical trials conducted by a former licensee of ours to evaluate the efficacy and safety of elobixibat
as a treatment for CIC, known as Echo 1 and Echo 2, ended in 2014. Our former licensee stopped Echo 1 and Echo 2
early citing an issue related to the distribution of study drug to study sites that was unrelated to the performance of
elobixibat. Subsequent analysis by our former licensee determined the issue to have affected only Echo 2 and a small
number of patients. As a result of the early termination of the trials, each of Echo 1 and Echo 2 enrolled substantially
fewer than the number of patients contemplated by the trial’s statistical plan. A third Phase 3 clinical trial conducted by
our former licensee to evaluate the long-term safety of elobixibat, known as Echo 3, ended in 2015.
Echo 1. Echo 1 was a multicenter, double blind, placebo controlled Phase 3 clinical trial of elobixibat as a
treatment for CIC conducted at 71 sites in the United States, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Israel, the
United Kingdom, Poland and South Africa. SBM and CSBM were defined in the trial in the same manner as our
completed Phase 2b trial of elobixibat in CIC discussed above. The statistical plan for the trial contemplated that
840 patients would be enrolled.
After a screening period, patients in the trial entered a two-week baseline period. Following the baseline period,
patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a once daily oral dose of 5 mg of elobixibat, 10 mg of elobixibat or
placebo, in tablet form, for 26 weeks. During the baseline period and the treatment period, patients reported daily bowel
and abdominal symptoms. At the time the trial was stopped, 376 patients had been randomized into the trial, of which
312 patients had completed 12 weeks of treatment and 146 patients had completed 26 weeks of treatment.
The primary endpoint of the trial was the overall CSBM response. CSBM response refers to a patient having at
least three CSBMs per week and an increase of at least one CSBM per week from baseline, in each case for at least nine
of the first 12 weeks of the treatment period and at least three of the weeks from week 9 to week 12. The 5 mg elobixibat
dose met the primary endpoint, and the result was statistically significant based on the study’s predefined statistical
methodology (p = 0.029). There was a trend in favor of the 10 mg elobixibat dose on the primary endpoint, but the result
did not achieve statistical significance using the same methodology. Subsequently, at a meeting with the FDA held in
2014, the FDA advised us that, based on the unplanned stopping of the study, the FDA would apply a different statistical
methodology than had been predefined and utilized for the study. Using the FDA’s chosen statistical methodology,
neither the 5 mg nor the 10 mg dose of elobixibat achieved statistical significance on the primary endpoint in Echo 1.
All doses of elobixibat were generally well tolerated in the trial. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events
was dose related (7%, 5 mg elobixibat and 9%, 10 mg elobixibat, versus 2% placebo). There were dose-related
incidences of treatment-emergent abdominal pain and diarrhea considered a reasonable possibility to be treatment related
(abdominal pain: 4%, 5 mg elobixibat and 12%, 10 mg elobixibat, versus 2% placebo; diarrhea: 6%, 5 mg elobixibat and
6%, 10 mg elobixibat, versus 2% placebo). None of the three SAEs reported in the 5 mg elobixibat dose group, two
SAEs reported in the 10 mg elobixibat dose group and one SAE reported in the placebo group were considered by the
applicable investigator to be related to study drug. The reported SAEs were: in the 5 mg elobixibat dose group,
inflammation of the gallbladder, developmental bone growth disease and carpal tunnel syndrome; in the 10 mg
elobixibat dose group, glaucoma and back pain worsening; and in the placebo group, hemorrhoids.
Echo 2. Echo 2 was a multicenter, double blind, placebo controlled Phase 3 clinical trial of elobixibat as a
treatment for CIC. The trial was conducted at 79 sites in the United States, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary,
Poland, Slovakia, Sweden, South Africa and the United Kingdom. Enrollment criteria, primary and key secondary
endpoints and trial design were substantially the same as for Echo 1, except that Echo 2 from the outset provided for a
12-week treatment period and included a four-week post-treatment withdrawal period. The statistical plan for the trial
contemplated that 840 patients would be enrolled.
15
Following the screening and baseline periods, patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a once daily oral
dose of 5 mg of elobixibat, 10 mg of elobixibat or placebo, in tablet form. During the baseline period and the treatment
period, patients reported daily bowel and abdominal symptoms. At the time the trial was stopped, 314 patients had been
randomized into the trial, of which 219 patients completed the trial including the withdrawal period.
In the trial, there were trends in favor of both the 5 mg and 10 mg elobixibat doses compared with placebo on the
primary endpoint, but the result did not reach statistical significance. There were no signs of rebound during the four-
week withdrawal period after the treatment period.
All doses of elobixibat were generally well tolerated in the trial. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events
was the same in the 5 mg elobixibat and placebo dose groups (2%) and greater in the 10 mg elobixibat dose group (6%).
There were dose-related incidences of abdominal pain and diarrhea considered a reasonable possibility to be treatment
related (abdominal pain: 2%, 5 mg elobixibat and 8%, 10 mg elobixibat, versus 2% placebo; diarrhea (7%, 5 mg
elobixibat and 9%, 10 mg elobixibat, versus <1% placebo). There was one SAE reported in the 5 mg elobixibat dose
group compared with five SAEs in the placebo group. The reported SAE in the 5 mg elobixibat dose group (basal cell
carcinoma on the lip) occurred during the withdrawal period and was not considered by the applicable investigator to be
related to study drug. The SAEs reported in the placebo group were tonsillitis, abnormal uterine bleeding, noncancerous
uterine tumor, hysterectomy and exacerbation of hypertension.
Long-Term Safety. The long-term safety trial was a multicenter, open label, Phase 3 extension clinical trial of
elobixibat as a treatment for CIC. The trial was conducted at 62 sites in the United States, Belgium, Canada, Czech
Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, South Africa, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Enrollment criteria included
completion of at least 12 weeks of double blind treatment in either Echo 1 or Echo 2. The trial enrolled 411 patients.
Patients received a 10 mg dose of elobixibat in tablet form once daily, subject to reduction to 5 mg in the discretion of
the applicable investigator, for up to 52 weeks. Of these patients, 282 patients completed 52 weeks of treatment with
elobixibat and 316 patients completed at least 24 weeks of treatment with elobixibat.
There were several co-primary endpoints in the trial, all related to safety. In the trial, elobixibat was generally well
tolerated, with a safety profile similar to Echo 1 and Echo 2. In particular, there was only one treatment-emergent SAE
reported (constipation) that was considered by the applicable investigator to be related to study drug. Treatment-
emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 6.1% of patients, and the majority of treatment-emergent
adverse events overall were classified as mild or moderate. Most adverse events were classified as GI.
U.S. Phase 2 Trial in NAFLD/NASH
We initiated a double-blind, placebo controlled Phase 2 trial which enrolled 47 patients across 15 U.S. sites, and
was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of elobixibat 5 mg in NASH/NAFLD patients over 16 weeks, as measured
by liver steatosis and various biomarkers. The primary endpoint of the trial was an assessment of the change in LDL-
cholesterol, and the secondary endpoints were an assessment in the change in liver fat by imaging, AST and ALT.
Exploratory endpoints included measures of glucose and insulin homeostasis, which are biomarkers for inflammation
and fibrosis. In August 2020, we announced that the trial achieved the primary endpoint of reduction of low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) but did not achieve proof-of- concept for other key NASH measures. Elobixibat
achieved the primary endpoint of a reduction in LDL-C with a clinically meaningful effect of -20.5 mg/dL in serum
LDL-C compared to -11.1 mg/dL, elobixibat vs. placebo (p<0.022). These reductions were in addition to lipid lowering
treatment where 56.5% of the elobixibat and 45.8% of the placebo patients were on stable lipid lowering therapy at
baseline. Liver fat reduction in the elobixibat group was -2.6% as measured by MRI PDFF. The baseline alanine
aminotransferase (ALT) levels were within the normal range and there was no meaningful change observed in the study.
Overall elobixibat was well tolerated, with adverse event incidence similar to placebo and with no serious adverse events
or discontinuations due to treatment. The study showed an acceptable gastrointestinal tolerability with 3 of 23 elobixibat
patients reporting mild to moderate transient diarrhea attributable to drug treatment. Based on the results of the trial, we
decided not to pursue further development of elobixibat in NAFLD or NASH.
16
Preclinical Program
A3907
We also have a preclinical program in adult liver and viral diseases. Our lead preclinical candidate for adult liver
diseases, A3907, is a selective inhibitor of the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) that has, based on
animal studies, high predicted systemic bioavailability in man. As a result, A3907 has the potential to not only affect
the bile acid pool by increased bile acid excretion in the stools but also through other pathways, including increased
urinary bile acid excretion. This unique approach may yield greater dosing flexibility, greater efficacy and lower rates of
adverse events associated with the category, such as diarrhea. We have completed IND enabling studies for A3907, plan
to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial in adult liver disease in the first half of 2021 and expect topline results in 2021.
A2342
Our lead preclinical candidate for adult viral and liver diseases, A2342, is an oral systemic sodium-taurocholate
co-transporting peptide, or NTCP inhibitor, which is a potent small molecule that blocks entry of bile acids into the liver.
We plan to complete IND enabling studies with A2342 this year. Preclinical efforts with other bile acid modulator
approaches continue.
License and Royalty Monetization Agreements
Agreement with EA Pharma
We entered into a license agreement with EA Pharma (formerly known as Ajinomoto Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.)
for the development and commercialization of elobixibat in specified countries in Asia in April 2012.
Pursuant to the agreement, we granted EA Pharma an exclusive license under patents and other technology owned
or licensed by us to develop and commercialize elobixibat in Japan and certain Asian Pacific markets for all prophylactic
or therapeutic uses of a pharmaceutical product for specified GI diseases and disorders, symptoms of constipation of all
causes, or postoperative ileus or for use in colonoscopy cleansing procedures. The agreement also provides that the
scope of the license may be expanded to include specified liver diseases, if we or an affiliate or licensee takes specified
development actions outside of EA Pharma’s licensed territory with elobixibat in that specified liver disease, or files an
application for regulatory approval of elobixibat outside of EA Pharma’s licensed territory for that specified liver
disease, or otherwise approves that EA Pharma conduct a clinical trial in that specified liver disease.
Payment Terms. As of February 15, 2021, we have received $49.9 million in upfront and milestone payments from
EA Pharma under the agreement. We are eligible to receive additional amounts of up to $5.3 million if a specified
regulatory event is achieved for elobixibat. In addition, subject to the terms of the royalty interest acquisition agreement,
or RIAA, with HealthCare Royalty Partners III, L.P., or HCR, described below, we may become eligible under the
license agreement to receive up to $29.1 million if specified sales milestones are achieved for elobixibat and we also
receive stepped royalties beginning in the high single digits on all future net sales of elobixibat.
EA Pharma’s obligation under the license agreement to pay royalties for elobixibat expires on a country-by-
country basis on the later of expiration of the patent rights in a country that have a specified scope and that we either
licensed to EA Pharma or, subject to a specified term limit, are developed by EA Pharma, alone or together with us, in
the course of its activities under the agreement or expiration of regulatory exclusivity for elobixibat in that country. The
Japanese patent rights with respect to elobixibat that we licensed to EA Pharma expire between 2026 and 2029. In
addition, we have two pending patent applications on specific crystal polymorphs of elobixibat that, if issued in Japan,
will expire in 2034 and 2035, respectively. Royalty rates are subject to reduction under the agreement in specified
circumstances, including in any country if elobixibat is subject to generic competition that exceeds a specified level, if
the bulk price for unformulated elobixibat purchased from us for use in Japan exceeds a specified threshold or if EA
Pharma licenses patent rights from any third party under circumstances where it is legally required to do so to
commercialize elobixibat in its licensed field in a particular country in its licensed territory.
17
Development and Commercialization. EA Pharma is responsible for funding and using commercially reasonable
efforts to execute the development and commercialization of elobixibat in its licensed field and licensed territory
pursuant to agreed territory development and commercialization plans that are updated from time to time. In Japan, EA
Pharma co-markets elobixibat with Mochida pursuant to a sublicense agreement and co-promotes elobixibat with Eisai.
A joint development committee and a joint commercialization committee, each comprising representatives of each
company, oversees activities under the agreement.
EA Pharma is responsible for commercial manufacture and supply of elobixibat in its licensed territory.
Restrictions. EA Pharma is not permitted to conduct clinical development or commercialize elobixibat outside of
its licensed field of use or licensed territory. We are not permitted to commercialize elobixibat for any field of use in EA
Pharma’s licensed territory. In addition, if we determine to develop elobixibat in a liver disease outside of EA Pharma’s
licensed territory, our development is subject to specified restrictions on clinical trial design. After the first commercial
sale of elobixibat in any country in EA Pharma’s licensed field, neither we nor EA Pharma may commercialize a
different product for the treatment of chronic constipation or IBS-C in that country, subject to specified exceptions.
Term and Termination. Either we or EA Pharma can terminate the agreement in its entirety or on a country-by-
country basis if the other party materially breaches the agreement and the breach is not cured within a specified period.
Also, either we or EA Pharma can terminate the agreement in its entirety if a specified bankruptcy-related event with
regard to the other party occurs. EA Pharma also has the right to terminate the agreement in its entirety or on a country-
by-country basis (except for Japan) for any reason upon 180 days’ notice. The rights and obligations of the parties that
survive termination of the agreement vary depending on the basis for the termination.
Royalty Monetization Agreement with HCR
In December 2017, the Company entered into a royalty interest acquisition agreement (RIAA) with HealthCare
Royalty Partners III, L.P. (HCR) pursuant to which it sold to HCR the right to receive all royalties from sales in Japan
and sales milestones achieved from any covered territory potentially payable to the Company under the Agreement, up
to a specified maximum “cap” amount of $78.8 million, based on the funds the Company received from HCR. In
January 2018, the Company received $44.5 million from HCR, net of certain transaction expenses, under the RIAA. On
June 8, 2020, the parties entered into an amendment to the RIAA pursuant to which HCR agreed to pay the Company an
additional $14.8 million, net of certain transactions expenses, in exchange for the elimination of the (i) $78.8 million cap
amount on HCR’s rights to receive royalties on sales in Japan and sales milestones for elobixibat in certain other
territories that may become payable by EA Pharma and (ii) the $15.0 million payable to the Company if a specified sales
milestone is achieved for elobixibat in Japan. The Company is obligated to make royalty interest payments to HCR
under the RIAA only to the extent it receives future Japanese royalties, sales milestones or other specified payments
from EA Pharma. Although the Company sold its rights to receive royalties from the sales of elobixibat in Japan, as a
result of its ongoing involvement in the cash flows related to these royalties, the Company will continue to account for
these royalties as revenue. Upon receipt of the payments from HCR the Company recorded net cash totaling
$59.3 million as a liability related to sale of future royalties (royalty obligation). The royalty obligation will be amortized
using the effective interest rate method.
The RIAA requires us to take certain actions with respect to the elobixibat royalties and sales milestones and with
respect to our license agreement with EA Pharma and contains certain representations and warranties, covenants,
indemnification obligations and other provisions that are customary for a royalty monetization transaction. In addition,
for protective purposes only, we (specifically, Albireo Pharma, Inc., Albireo AB and Elobix AB) have agreed to grant
HCR a precautionary security interest in specified assets related to elobixibat, but only in the event that, notwithstanding
the parties’ intentions, the transfer contemplated by the RIAA is held by a court of competent jurisdiction not to be a true
sale.
We record estimated royalties due for the current period in accrued other expenses until the payment is received
from EA Pharma at which time we then remit payment to HCR. In order to determine the accretion of the royalty
obligation, we are required to estimate the total amount of future royalty payments to be received and submitted to HCR.
18
The sum of these amounts less the $59.3 million proceeds we received will be recorded as interest expense over the life
of the royalty obligation. At December 31, 2020, our estimate of our total interest expense resulted in an annual effective
interest rate of approximately 19.0%.
Terminated License Agreement with Ferring International Center S.A.
We entered into a license agreement with Ferring International Center S.A., or Ferring, for the development and
commercialization of elobixibat outside of the territories licensed to EA Pharma in July 2012, following completion of
our Phase 2b clinical trial of elobixibat to treat CIC. In March 2015, Ferring terminated the agreement, effective in
September 2015. As a result of the termination of the agreement, all licenses that we granted to Ferring under the license
agreement terminated and commercial rights to elobixibat in Ferring’s licensed territory reverted to us. In addition,
Ferring was required, among other things, to assign to us all rights to all regulatory submissions and approvals controlled
by Ferring pertaining to elobixibat in the licensed territory and to grant to us an exclusive right of reference to data, and
specified licenses to data and technology, related to elobixibat for the development and commercialization of elobixibat
in its licensed field. Notwithstanding the termination of the license agreement, Ferring may be entitled to low single-digit
royalty payments on net sales of elobixibat on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis in specified
circumstances.
Patents and Proprietary Rights
We actively seek to protect the proprietary technology that we consider important to our business, including
compositions and forms and their methods of use in the United States, Europe and other jurisdictions internationally that
we consider key pharmaceutical markets. We also rely upon trade secrets and contracts to protect our proprietary
information.
As of December 31, 2020, our patent estate included 28 issued patents, 3 allowed applications and 19 pending
patent applications in the United States and approximately 50 counterpart patents and patent applications in other
jurisdictions, including 8European regional issued patents and Patent Cooperation Treaty, or PCT, applications which
allow us to seek corresponding patent protection worldwide. The actual protection afforded by a patent varies from
country to country and depends upon many factors, including the type of patent, the scope of its coverage and the
availability of legal remedies in a particular jurisdiction.
19
We consider the following United States, European (EP) and, in the case of elobixibat, Japanese (JP) patents to be
particularly important to the protection of our clinical-stage product candidates.
Product Candidate
Summary Description
Expiration Date
Odevixibat . . .
Composition of matter of odevixibat
September 2022
Method of using certain IBAT inhibitor(s) to treat certain
liver diseases
November 2031
Method of using certain IBAT inhibitor(s) in combination
with
a bile acid binder to treat certain liver diseases
November 2031
(EP
pending in US)
Crystal modifications of odevixibat
Formulations of odevixibat
Elobixibat . . . .
Composition of matter of elobixibat
June 2039
(allowed in US
and pending in
EP)
June 2039
(pending in US
and EP)
December 2021
(EP, JP);
August 2022
(US)
Method of using an IBAT inhibitor to treat Chronic
Idiopathic Constipation or
Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation
April 2024
Crystal modifications of elobixibat
April 2034
Crystal modifications of elobixibat
Formulations of elobixibat
Process for manufacturing
October 2035
(US and JP,
pending in EP)
2035 (issued and
pending in US)
2039 (US,
pending in EP
and JP)
Method of using certain IBAT inhibitor(s) to treat NASH November 2031
A3907 . . . . . . . .
Composition of matter of A3907
February 2040
(allowed in US,
pending PCT)
We also have issued patents and pending patent applications with equivalent or substantially comparable
protection for our product candidates in jurisdictions internationally that we consider key pharmaceutical markets.
The patent expiration dates referenced above do not reflect any potential patent term extension that we may
receive for the United States under The United States Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984,
known as the Hatch-Waxman Act, or similar patent term extension legislation in Europe and Japan. The Hatch-Waxman
20
Act generally permits a patent extension term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during the FDA
regulatory review process. Patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years
from the date of FDA approval. The patent term restoration period is generally one-half of the time between the effective
date of an investigational new drug application, or IND, and the submission date of a new drug application, or NDA,
plus the time between the submission date and approval date of an NDA. Typically, only one patent applicable to an
approved drug is eligible for an extension, and, with limited exceptions, the extension must be applied for prior to
expiration of the patent. The United States Patent and Trademark Office, in consultation with the FDA, reviews and
approves applications for patent term extension.
In the European Economic Area (EEA; the European Union member countries plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and
Norway), Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 generally permits an extension of the patent term for a drug as compensation for
the patent term lost during the regulatory review process by the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, or the national
drug agencies. The term of a supplementary protection certificate, or SPC, corresponds to the period between the filing
date of the patent and the date of the first Marketing Authorization in the EEA, reduced by a period of 5 years. An SPC
may extend the patent term for an approved drug up to five years, but the remaining patent term may not exceed 15 years
from the date of the first Marketing Authorization. Only one patent that covers the approved drug is eligible for an SPC.
Applications for an SPC are reviewed and approved by the national patent offices of the EEA countries, and must be
lodged within six months of the authorization date for the drug in each EEA country (or within six months of the grant of
the patent, in case the Marketing Authorization is granted first).
In Japan, the Japanese Pharmaceutical Affairs Law generally permits the extension of the patent term for a drug as
compensation for patent term lost during the regulatory review process by the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical
Devices Agency (PMDA). The patent term extension corresponds to the period from the date of the start of clinical trials
or the date of patent registration, whichever is later, until one day prior to the date of approval for the drug. The term of a
patent can be extended for up to five years, irrespective of the remaining natural term of the patent as of the date of
approval. Each patent that covers the active ingredient in the approved drug, or a method of using the approved drug in
the approved indication, is eligible for the extension, which means that, for any particular drug, multiple patents may be
extended. The extension must be applied for prior to expiration of the patent and within three months from the date of
approval. The Japanese Patent Office reviews and approves applications for patent term extension.
Sales and Marketing
We currently are building the commercial leadership infrastructure, and expanding the sales and distribution
organization that we believe will be necessary to effectively support the commercialization of odevixibat in the United
States and Europe, if odevixibat is approved for PFIC or any other pediatric cholestatic liver disease or disorder. In
addition to our Chief Commercial Officer, we have hired a President of Americas and a President of International, and
continue to build sales and account teams in both jurisdictions. We have entered into a Co-Promotion Agreement with
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. for the co-promotion of odevixibat in the United States. The initial term of the arrangement is
two years from launch of odevixibat, terminable at will by either party after one year following launch. We believe that
our commercial organization can be modest in size and targeted to the relatively small number of specialists in the
United States and Europe who treat children with orphan cholestatic liver disease.
The commercial infrastructure for orphan products typically consists of a targeted, specialty sales force that calls
on a limited and focused group of physicians supported by sales management, internal sales support, an internal
marketing group and distribution support. Additional capabilities important to the marketplace include the management
of key accounts such as managed care organizations, group purchasing organizations, specialty pharmacies, government
accounts and reimbursement support. Based on the number of physicians that treat orphan pediatric cholestatic liver
diseases and disorders, we believe that we can effectively target the physician audience for odevixibat in the United
States and Europe by establishing a sales force either internally or by contract. To develop the appropriate commercial
infrastructure, we will have to invest significant amounts of financial and management resources, some of which may be
committed prior to any confirmation that odevixibat will be approved.
21
Outside of the United States and Europe, we plan to selectively utilize collaborations, distribution or other
marketing arrangements with third parties to commercialize odevixibat in any approved indication(s). Likewise, we
intend to selectively seek alliances and collaborations to assist us in furthering the development or commercialization of
product candidates, such as potentially, elobixibat, targeting large primary care markets that must be served by large
sales and marketing organizations.
Manufacturing
We do not own or operate, and currently have no plans to establish, manufacturing facilities for the production of
clinical or commercial quantities of odevixibat, elobixibat, A3907 or any of our other product candidates. We currently
rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates and any products that
we may develop.
We currently engage a single third-party manufacturer to provide the active pharmaceutical ingredient, or API, for
odevixibat and elobixibat. We also currently engage single third-party manufacturers to provide fill and finish services
for the final drug product formulation of each of odevixibat, elobixibat and A3907 for use in our clinical trials.
We obtain the supplies of our API and drug products from these manufacturers pursuant to agreements that include
specific supply timelines, quality and volume expectations. We obtain the supplies of our product candidates from these
manufacturers under master services contracts and specific work orders. However, we do not have long-term supply
arrangements in place. We do not currently have arrangements in place for redundant supply or a second source for API
for any of odevixibat, elobixibat or A3907. If any of our current manufacturers becomes unavailable to us for any
reason, we believe that there are a number of potential replacements, although we would likely incur significant delay in
identifying and qualifying such replacements.
Odevixibat, elobixibat and A3907 are organic compounds of low molecular weight, and are referred to as “small
molecules.” We have selected these compounds based on their potential efficacy and safety, although they are also
associated with reasonable cost of goods. We expect to continue to develop product candidates that can be produced
cost-effectively at contract manufacturing facilities.
Competition
The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense
competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary products. We face potential competition from many different sources,
including major pharmaceutical, specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions,
government agencies and private and public research institutions. Any product candidates that we successfully develop
and commercialize will compete with existing therapies and new therapies that may become available in the future.
Many of our competitors may have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and
development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing
approved products than we do. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific
and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and patient enrollment for clinical trials, as well as in
acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. Smaller or early stage companies may also
prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with larger or more established
companies.
Our commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize
products that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient or are less expensive
than any products that we may develop. Our competitors also may obtain marketing approvals for their products more
rapidly than we obtain approval for our products. In addition, our ability to compete may be affected because in some
cases insurers or other third-party payors seek to encourage the use of generic products. This may have the effect of
making branded products less attractive, from a cost perspective, to buyers.
22
The key competitive factors affecting the success of our product candidates are likely to be their efficacy, safety,
tolerability, convenience, price and the availability of coverage and reimbursement from government and other third-
party payors.
We are aware of other companies that are developing product candidates that, like odevixibat and elobixibat, act
via IBAT inhibition. Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is conducting a Phase 3 clinical trial of maralixibat in PFIC, for which
it has reported that it expects to complete enrollment in the second quarter of 2021 and announce topline data by year-
end 2021. As of February 2021, Mirum announced the completion of a rolling NDA submission for maralixibat in
ALGS, and is planning for a potential launch in ALGS in the second half of 2021. The FDA granted breakthrough
therapy designation to maralixibat for the treatment of pruritus associated with ALGS in October 2019. We understand
that Mirum’s MAA for maralixibat for the treatment of patients with PFIC type 2 has been accepted for review by the
EMA. GlaxoSmithKline’s linerixibat has completed Phase 2 clinical development as a treatment for pruritus in patients
with PBC, with plans underway to progress linerixibat to Phase 3 in 2021. The FDA granted orphan drug designation to
linerixibat for the treatment of PBC in September 2019.
The competition in our target indications includes the following.
PFIC and other pediatric cholestatic liver diseases and disorders. For many cholestatic liver diseases and
disorders, including in particular PFIC, there are no approved therapies. With regard to the pruritus that is characteristic
of these diseases, symptomatic off-label treatment with bile acid sequestrants, such as cholestyramine (marketed as
Colestyr, Efensol, Ipocol, Kolestran, Lipocol, Olestyr, Prevalite or Quantalan in various countries), typically provides
only modest relief. Bristol Myers Squibb has discontinued manufacture of Questran, but generic versions of the drug are
marketed by Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. and Sandoz, the generic
pharmaceuticals division of Novartis AG.
A number of other drugs, including UDCA, a bile acid which is approved in France only for PFIC type 3,
rifampin, an antibiotic derivative, and naltrexone, an opioid antagonist, are used off-label for patients suffering from
cholestatic liver disease. Additionally, surgical interventions, such as PEBD surgery, and external liver filtering
procedures are also employed in an attempt to lower bile acid levels, manage pruritus and improve measures of liver
function.
As noted above, Mirum is conducting a Phase 3 clinical trial of maralixibat in PFIC, for which it has reported that
it expects to complete enrollment in the second quarter of 2021 and announce topline data by year-end 2021. Mirum has
also announced that it initiated a rolling submission of an NDA for maralixibat for the treatment of cholestatic pruritus
associated with ALGS in the third quarter of 2020, expects to complete the rolling submission of the NDA in the first
quarter of 2021, and is planning for a potential launch in ALGS in the second half of 2021. We understand that Mirum’s
MAA for maralixibat for the treatment of patients with PFIC type 2 has been accepted for review by the EMA. In
addition, Intercept Pharmaceuticals’ obeticholic acid, or OCA, is approved in the U.S. in combination with UDCA, or as
a monotherapy for patients unable to tolerate UDCA, to treat PBC. OCA is also in Phase 2 development at Intercept as a
treatment for biliary atresia. In July 2019, Genfit SA received orphan designations from the FDA and EMA for its PPAR
alpha/delta agonist, (elafibranor), for the treatment of PBC. Genfit has announced plans to advance elafibranor into a
Phase 3 program for PBC in 2020. Gilead Sciences, Inc.’s FXR agonist, cilofexor, is in Phase 2 development for PBC,
and Phase 3 development for PSC.
Chronic Constipation. Linaclotide, marketed by Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Allergan as Linzess in the
United States and as Constella in Europe, is approved in the United States for the treatment of CIC and IBS-C and in
Europe for the treatment of IBS-C. Linaclotide is also approved for the treatment of IBS-C in Japan, where it is marketed
by Astellas. It is also marketed by AstraZeneca’s partner Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in China, where it was
approved for use in 2019. Linaclotide targets guanylate cyclase C in the intestines and, by doing so, induces intestinal
chloride secretion, which results in the outpouring of water into the intestine. The primary side effect of linaclotide is
diarrhea. In addition, lubiprostone, which is marketed in the United States as Amitiza by Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA,
Inc., is approved in the United States for the treatment of CIC, IBS-C and opioid-induced constipation. Amitiza is also
approved for the treatment of CIC in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, and for the treatment of chronic constipation
23
in Japan, where it is marketed by Mylan, N.V. Amitiza binds selectively to and activates the type-2 chloride channel in
the intestine releasing chloride and water into the intestine. The primary side effect of Amitiza is nausea. Prucalopride,
marketed by Shire in the United States as Motegrity, in the European Union as Resolor, is a motility agent approved for
the treatment of CIC. Motegrity and Resolor are associated with a high rate of headaches, and belong to a class of drugs
known as 5-HT receptor drugs that has been linked to cardiovascular safety issues.
Numerous OTC products are available for constipation. These include psyllium husk (such as Metamucil),
methylcellulose (such as Citrucel), calcium polycarbophil (such as FiberCon), lactulose (such as Cephulac),
polyethylene glycol (such as MiraLax), sennosides (such as Exlax), bisacodyl (such as Ducolax), docusate sodium (such
as Colace), magnesium hydroxide (such as Milk of Magnesia), saline enemas (such as Fleet) and sorbitol. Given the low
barriers to access, many CIC sufferers first try OTC fiber and laxatives, but these options are not sufficiently effective
for many people.
Plecanatide, marketed as Trulance by Bausch Health Companies, Inc., is approved in the United States to treat CIC
and IBS-C and is, like linaclotide, a guanylate cyclase-C agonist. On September 12, 2019, the FDA approved
Ardelyx, Inc.’s product, IBSRELA (tenapanor), for the treatment of IBS-C. IBSRELA inhibits the sodium transporter
NHE3 and reduces sodium uptake from the gut to increase the secretion of water in the intestines.
Government Regulation
Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local level, and in other countries and
jurisdictions, including the European Union, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development,
testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, labeling, advertising, promotion,
distribution, marketing, post-approval monitoring and reporting, and import and export of pharmaceutical products. The
processes for obtaining regulatory approvals in the United States and in foreign countries and jurisdictions, along with
subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and regulations and other regulatory requirements, require the
expenditure of substantial time and financial resources.
Review and Approval of Drugs in the United States
In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and its
implementing regulations. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product
development process, the approval process or after approval may subject an applicant or sponsor to a variety of
administrative or judicial sanctions, including refusal by the FDA to approve pending applications, withdrawal of an
approval, imposition of a clinical hold, issuance of warning letters and other types of letters, product recalls, product
seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts,
restitution, disgorgement of profits, or civil or criminal investigations and penalties brought by the FDA and the
Department of Justice, or DOJ, or other governmental entities.
An applicant seeking approval to market and distribute a new drug product in the United States must typically
undertake the following:
•
•
•
•
completion of preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies in compliance with the
FDA’s good laboratory practice, or GLP, regulations;
submission to the FDA of an IND, which must take effect before human clinical trials may begin;
approval by an independent institutional review board, or IRB, representing each clinical site before each
clinical trial may be initiated;
performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with good clinical
practices, or GCP, to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed drug product for each proposed
indication;
24
•
•
•
•
•
•
satisfactory completion of FDA audits of clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GCPs and the integrity
of the clinical data;
preparation and submission to the FDA of an NDA;
review of the product by an FDA advisory committee, where appropriate or if applicable;
satisfactory completion of one or more FDA inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which
the product, or components thereof, are produced to assess compliance with current Good Manufacturing
Practices, or cGMP, requirements and to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to
preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality and purity;
payment of user fees and securing FDA approval of the NDA; and
compliance with any post-approval requirements, including Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies, or
REMS, and post-approval studies required by the FDA, if applicable.
Preclinical Studies
Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluation of the purity and stability of the manufactured drug substance or
API and the formulated drug or drug product, as well as in vitro and animal studies to assess the safety and activity of
the drug for initial testing in humans and to establish a rationale for therapeutic use. The conduct of preclinical studies is
subject to federal regulations and requirements, including GLP regulations. The results of the preclinical tests, together
with manufacturing information, analytical data, any available clinical data or literature and plans for clinical trials,
among other things, are submitted to the FDA as part of an IND. Some long-term preclinical testing, such as animal tests
of reproductive adverse events and carcinogenicity, may continue after the IND is submitted.
Human Clinical Trials in Support of an NDA
Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational product to human subjects under the supervision of
qualified investigators in accordance with GCP requirements, which include, among other things, the requirement that
all research subjects provide their informed consent in writing before their participation in any clinical trial. Clinical
trials are conducted under written protocols detailing, among other things, the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the
objectives of the trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety, and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. A
protocol for each clinical trial and any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the
IND. An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA raises concerns or
questions related to a proposed clinical trial and places the trial on clinical hold. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the
FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can be initiated or restarted (in cases when the trial
is placed on clinical hold after it has already begun).
In addition, an IRB representing each institution that is participating in the clinical trial must review and approve
the plan for any clinical trial before it commences at that institution, and the IRB must conduct a continuing review and
reapprove the trial at least annually. The IRB must review and approve, among other things, the trial protocol and
informed consent information to be provided to clinical trial subjects. An IRB must operate in compliance with FDA
regulations. Information about certain clinical trials, including details of the protocol and eventually study results, also
must be submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health for public dissemination on the
ClinicalTrials.gov data registry.
Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases, which may overlap or be combined:
•
Phase 1. The drug is initially introduced into healthy human subjects or, in certain indications such as
cancer, patients with the target disease or condition, in order to be tested for safety, dosage tolerance,
25
absorption, metabolism, distribution, excretion and, if possible, to gain an early indication of its
effectiveness and to determine optimal dosage.
•
•
Phase 2. The drug is administered to a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and
safety risks, in order to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases and to
determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage.
Phase 3. The drug is administered to an expanded patient population, generally at geographically dispersed
clinical trial sites, in one or more well-controlled clinical trials in order to generate enough data to
statistically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the product for approval, to establish the overall risk-benefit
profile of the drug, and to provide adequate information for the labeling of the drug.
Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted at least annually to the FDA and more
frequently if SAEs occur. In addition, IND safety reports must be submitted to the FDA for any of the following: serious
and unexpected suspected adverse reactions; findings from other clinical trials or animal or in vitro testing that suggest a
significant risk in humans exposed to the drug; and any clinically important increase in the case of a serious suspected
adverse reaction over that listed in the protocol or investigator brochure. Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials may
not be completed successfully within any specified period, or at all. Furthermore, the FDA or the sponsor may suspend
or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research subjects are being
exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its
institution, = if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the clinical protocol or GCP or if the drug has
been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients. The FDA will typically inspect one or more clinical sites to
assure compliance with GCP and the integrity of the clinical data submitted.
Submission of an NDA to the FDA
Assuming successful completion of required clinical testing and other requirements, the results of the preclinical
studies and clinical trials, together with detailed information relating to the product’s chemistry, manufacture, controls
and proposed labeling, among other things, are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA, which requests approval to
market the drug product for one or more indications. Under federal law, the fee for the submission of an NDA for which
clinical data is required exceeds $2.8 million for FY2021, and the sponsor of an approved NDA is also subject to an
annual program fee, currently exceeding $330,000 per program. These fees are typically increased annually, but
exemptions and waivers may be available under certain circumstances (such as a waiver for the first human drug
application submitted by a qualifying small business and exemptions for orphan products).
The FDA conducts a preliminary review of an NDA within 60 days of its receipt and informs the sponsor by the
74th day after the FDA’s receipt of the submission whether the application is sufficiently complete to permit substantive
review. The FDA may request additional information rather than accept an NDA for filing. In this event, the application
must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application is also subject to review before the
FDA accepts it for filing. After the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review.
The FDA has agreed to specified performance goals in the review process of NDAs. Most such applications are meant to
be reviewed within ten months from the date the NDA is accepted for filing, and most applications for “priority review”
products are meant to be reviewed within six months from the date the NDA is accepted for filing. The review process
may be extended by the FDA for three additional months to consider new information or in the case of a clarification
provided by the applicant to address an outstanding deficiency identified by the FDA following the original submission.
Before approving an NDA, the FDA typically will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is or will be
manufactured. These pre-approval inspections cover all facilities associated with an NDA submission, including drug
component manufacturing (such as active pharmaceutical ingredients), finished drug product manufacturing, and control
testing laboratories. The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and
facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and are adequate to assure consistent production of the drug
product within required specifications. Additionally, before approving an NDA, the FDA will typically inspect one or
more clinical sites to assure compliance with GCP.
26
In addition, as a condition of approval, the FDA may require an applicant to develop a REMS. REMS use risk
minimization strategies beyond the professional labeling to ensure that the benefits of the product outweigh the potential
risks. To determine whether a REMS is needed, the FDA will consider the size of the population likely to use the
product, seriousness of the disease, expected benefit of the product, expected duration of treatment, seriousness of
known or potential adverse events, and whether the product is a new molecular entity. REMS are tailored to the specific
risk/benefit profile of a drug and can include requirements such as medication guides for patients, detailed
communication plans for healthcare professionals, and elements to assure safe use, or ETASU. ETASU may include, but
are not limited to, special training or certification for prescribing or dispensing, dispensing only under certain
circumstances, special monitoring, restricted distribution, and the use of patient registries. The FDA may require a
REMS as a condition of approval or post-approval if it becomes aware of a serious risk associated with use of the
product. The requirement for a REMS and the specific components that are involved can materially affect the potential
market and profitability of a product.
The FDA often refers an application for a new drug to an advisory committee. Typically, an advisory committee is
a panel of independent experts, including clinicians and other scientific experts, that reviews, evaluates and provides a
recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by
the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making final
approval decisions about a particular NDA.
Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy and Priority Review Designations
The FDA is authorized to designate certain products for expedited development or review if they are intended to
address an unmet medical need in the treatment of a serious or life-threatening disease or condition. These programs
include fast track designation, breakthrough therapy designation and priority review designation.
Specifically, the FDA may grant a product the fast track designation if it is intended, whether alone or in
combination with one or more other drugs, for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and it
demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for such a disease or condition. For fast track products,
sponsors may have greater interactions with the FDA and the FDA may initiate review of sections of a fast track
product’s NDA before the application is complete. This rolling review may be available if the FDA determines, after
preliminary evaluation of clinical data submitted by the sponsor, that a fast track product may be effective. The sponsor
must also provide, and the FDA must approve, a schedule for the submission of the remaining information and the
sponsor must pay applicable user fees. However, the FDA’s time period goal for reviewing a fast track product
application does not begin until the last section of the NDA is submitted. In addition, the fast track designation may be
withdrawn by the sponsor or rescinded by the FDA if the designation is no longer supported by data emerging in the
clinical trial process. In September of 2018, the FDA granted fast track designation to odevixibat for the treatment of
pruritus associated with PFIC.
In 2012, Congress enacted the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, or FDASIA. This law
established a new regulatory program for products designated as “breakthrough therapies.” A product may be designated
as a breakthrough therapy if it is intended, either alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious
or life-threatening disease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product may demonstrate
substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial
treatment effects observed early in clinical development. The FDA may take certain actions with respect to designated
breakthrough therapies, including: holding meetings with the sponsor throughout the development process; providing
timely advice to the product sponsor regarding development and approval; involving more senior staff in the review
process; assigning a cross-disciplinary project lead for the review team; and taking other steps to design the clinical trials
in an efficient manner.
Finally, the FDA may designate a product for priority review if it is a drug that treats a serious condition and, if
approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness. The FDA determines at the time that the
marketing application is submitted, on a case- by-case basis, whether the proposed drug represents a significant
improvement when compared with other available therapies. Significant improvement may be illustrated by evidence of
27
increased effectiveness in the treatment of a condition, elimination or substantial reduction of a treatment-limiting drug
reaction, documented enhancement of patient compliance that may lead to improvement in serious outcomes, or
evidence of safety and effectiveness in a new subpopulation. A priority review designation is intended to direct overall
attention and resources to the evaluation of such applications, and to shorten the FDA’s goal for taking action on a
marketing application from ten months to six months.
Accelerated Approval Pathway
The FDA may grant accelerated approval to a drug for a serious or life-threatening condition that generally
provides a meaningful therapeutic advantage to patients over existing treatments and based upon a demonstration that
the drug has an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. The FDA may also
grant accelerated approval for such a drug when the product has an effect on an intermediate clinical endpoint that can
be measured earlier than an effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality, or IMM, and that is reasonably likely to predict
an effect on IMM or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity, rarity, or prevalence of the condition and the
availability or lack of alternative treatments. Drugs granted accelerated approval must meet the same statutory standards
for safety and effectiveness as those granted traditional approval.
For the purposes of accelerated approval, a surrogate endpoint is a marker, such as a laboratory measurement,
radiographic image, physical sign, or other measure that is thought to predict clinical benefit, but is not itself a measure
of clinical benefit. Surrogate endpoints can often be measured more easily or more rapidly than clinical endpoints. An
intermediate clinical endpoint is a measurement of a therapeutic effect that is considered reasonably likely to predict the
clinical benefit of a drug, such as an effect on IMM. The FDA has limited experience with accelerated approvals based
on intermediate clinical endpoints, but has indicated that such endpoints generally may support accelerated approval
when the therapeutic effect measured by the endpoint is not itself a clinical benefit and basis for traditional approval, if
there is a basis for concluding that the therapeutic effect is reasonably likely to predict the ultimate long-term clinical
benefit of a drug.
The accelerated approval pathway is most often used in settings in which the course of a disease is long and an
extended period of time is required to measure the intended clinical benefit of a drug, even if the effect on the surrogate
or intermediate clinical endpoint occurs rapidly. For example, accelerated approval has been used extensively in the
development and approval of drugs for treatment of a variety of cancers in which the goal of therapy is generally to
improve survival or decrease morbidity and the duration of the typical disease course requires lengthy and sometimes
large clinical trials to demonstrate a clinical or survival benefit.
The accelerated approval pathway is usually contingent on a sponsor’s agreement to conduct, in a diligent manner,
additional post-approval confirmatory studies to verify and describe the drug’s clinical benefit. As a result, a product
candidate approved on this basis is subject to rigorous post-marketing compliance requirements, including the
completion of Phase 4 or post-approval clinical trials to confirm the effect on the clinical endpoint. Failure to conduct
required post-approval studies, or to confirm the predicted clinical benefit of the product during post-marketing studies,
would allow the FDA to withdraw approval of the drug. All promotional materials for product candidates being
considered and approved under the accelerated approval program are subject to prior review by the FDA.
Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher
The FDA may grant rare pediatric disease designation for indications in the treatment or prevention of a rare
disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States and that is a serious or life-
threatening disease that primarily affects individuals aged from birth to 18 years, including age groups often called
neonates, infants, children and adolescents. In June 2018, the FDA granted a rare pediatric disease designation to
odevixibat for the treatment of PFIC. Under the FDCA, a sponsor who receives approval of an NDA for a product that is
for the prevention or treatment of a rare pediatric disease and meets certain additional criteria, may qualify for a rare
pediatric disease priority review voucher, or PRV. A PRV can be redeemed to receive priority review under an expedited
timeframe for a subsequent marketing application for a different product. A PRV may also be sold or transferred from
the initial sponsor to another sponsor and may be further transferred any number of times before it is used. The United
28
States Congress recently extended the FDA’s authority to award rare pediatric disease PRVs until 2024 and until 2026
for products that receive rare pediatric disease designation by 2024.
The FDA’s Decision on an NDA
On the basis of the FDA’s evaluation of the NDA and accompanying information, including the results of the
inspection of the manufacturing facilities, the FDA may issue either an approval letter or a complete response letter
(CRL). An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the product with specific prescribing information and for
specific indications. A CRL generally outlines the deficiencies in the submission and may require substantial additional
testing or information in order for the FDA to reconsider the application. If and when those deficiencies have been
addressed to the FDA’s satisfaction in a resubmission of the NDA, the FDA will issue an approval letter. The FDA has
committed to reviewing such resubmissions in response to the CRL in either two or six months depending on the type of
information included. Even with the submission of this additional information, however, the FDA ultimately may decide
that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval.
If the FDA approves a product, it may limit the approved indications for use for the product; require that
contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling; require that post-approval studies,
including Phase 4 clinical trials, be conducted to further assess the drug’s safety after approval; require testing and
surveillance programs to monitor the product after commercialization; or impose other conditions, including distribution
restrictions or other risk management mechanisms, including REMS, which can materially affect the potential market
and profitability of the product. The FDA may prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the results of
post-market studies or surveillance programs. After approval, many types of changes to the approved product, such as
adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional labeling claims, are subject to further testing
requirements and FDA review and approval.
Post-Approval Requirements
Drugs manufactured, marketed or distributed pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing
regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, requirements relating to recordkeeping, periodic reporting,
product sampling and distribution, advertising and promotion and reporting of adverse experiences with the product.
After approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling claims, are
subject to prior FDA review and approval. There also are continuing, annual user fee requirements for any marketed
products and related establishments, as well as new application fees for supplemental applications.
In addition, drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs
are required to register their establishments with the FDA and state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced
inspections by the FDA for compliance with cGMP requirements. Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly
regulated and often require prior FDA approval before being implemented. FDA regulations also require investigation
and correction of any deviations from cGMP and impose reporting and documentation requirements upon the sponsor
and others involved in the manufacturing process. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and
effort in the area of production and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance.
Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and
standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously
unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with
manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in revisions to the approved
labeling to add new safety information; imposition of post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks; or
imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS program. Other potential consequences include, among
other things:
•
restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, complete withdrawal of the product from the
market or product recalls;
29
•
•
•
•
fines, warning letters or holds on post-approval clinical trials;
refusal of the FDA to approve pending NDAs or supplements to approved NDAs, or suspension or
revocation of product license approvals;
product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of products; or
injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
The FDA strictly regulates marketing, labeling, advertising and promotion of products that are placed on the
market. Drugs may be promoted only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved
label. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses,
and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant penalties.
In addition, the distribution of prescription pharmaceutical products is subject to the Prescription Drug Marketing
Act, or PDMA, which regulates the distribution of drugs and drug samples at the federal level, and sets minimum
standards for the registration and regulation of drug distributors by the states. Both the PDMA and state laws limit the
distribution of prescription pharmaceutical product samples and impose requirements to ensure accountability in
distribution. Most recently, the Drug Supply Chain Security Act, or DSCSA, was enacted with the aim of building an
electronic system to identify and trace certain prescription drugs distributed in the United States. The DSCSA mandates
phased-in and resource-intensive obligations for pharmaceutical manufacturers, wholesale distributors, and dispensers
over a 10-year period that is expected to culminate in November 2023.
Abbreviated New Drug Applications for Generic Drugs
In 1984, with passage of the Hatch-Waxman Amendments to the FDCA, Congress authorized the FDA to approve
generic drugs that are the same as drugs previously approved by the FDA under the NDA provisions of the statute. To
obtain approval of a generic drug, an applicant must submit an abbreviated new drug application, or ANDA, to the
agency. In support of such applications, a generic manufacturer may rely on the preclinical and clinical testing conducted
for a drug product previously approved under an NDA, known as the reference listed drug, or RLD. Specifically, in
order for an ANDA to be approved, the FDA must find that the generic version is identical to the RLD with respect to
the active ingredients, the route of administration, the dosage form, and the strength of the drug. At the same time, the
FDA must also determine that the generic drug is “bioequivalent” to the innovator drug. Under the statute, a generic drug
is bioequivalent to a RLD if “the rate and extent of absorption of the drug do not show a significant difference from the
rate and extent of absorption of the listed drug . . .”
Upon approval of an ANDA, the FDA indicates whether the generic product is “therapeutically equivalent” to the
RLD in its publication “Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations,” also referred to as the
“Orange Book.” In addition, by operation of certain state laws and numerous health insurance programs, the FDA’s
designation of therapeutic equivalence often results in substitution of the generic drug without the knowledge or consent
of either the prescribing physician or patient.
Under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments, the FDA may not approve an ANDA until any applicable period of
nonpatent exclusivity for the RLD has expired. The FDCA provides a period of five years of nonpatent data exclusivity
for a new drug containing a new chemical entity. In cases where such exclusivity has been granted, an ANDA may not
be submitted to the FDA until the expiration of five years unless the submission is accompanied by a Paragraph IV
certification, in which case the applicant may submit its application four years after the original product approval. The
FDCA also provides for a period of three years of exclusivity if the NDA includes reports of one or more new clinical
investigations, other than bioavailability or bioequivalence studies, that were conducted by or for the applicant and are
essential to the approval of the application. This three-year exclusivity period often protects changes to a previously
approved drug product, such as a new dosage form, route of administration, combination or indication.
30
Hatch-Waxman Patent Certification and the 30-Month Stay
Upon approval of an NDA or a supplement thereto, NDA sponsors are required to list with the FDA each patent
with claims that cover the applicant’s product or an approved method of using the product. Each of the patents listed by
the NDA sponsor is published in the Orange Book. When an ANDA applicant submits its application to the FDA, the
applicant is required to certify to the FDA concerning any patents listed for the RLD in the Orange Book, except for
patents covering methods of use for which the ANDA applicant is not seeking approval. To the extent that the
Section 505(b)(2) NDA applicant is relying on studies conducted for an already approved product, the applicant also is
required to certify to the FDA concerning any patents listed for the approved product in the Orange Book to the same
extent that an ANDA applicant would. Specifically, the applicant for a follow-on drug product must certify with respect
to each patent that:
•
•
•
•
the required patent information has not been filed;
the listed patent has expired;
the listed patent has not expired, but will expire on a particular date and approval is sought after patent
expiration; or
the listed patent is invalid, unenforceable or will not be infringed by the new product.
A certification that the new product will not infringe the already approved product’s listed patents or that such
patents are invalid or unenforceable is called a Paragraph IV certification. If the applicant does not challenge the listed
patents or indicates that it is not seeking approval of a patented method of use, the ANDA application will not be
approved until all the listed patents claiming the referenced product have expired (other than method of use patents
involving indications for which the ANDA applicant is not seeking approval).
If the ANDA applicant has provided a Paragraph IV certification to the FDA, the applicant must also send notice
of the Paragraph IV certification to the NDA owner and patent holders once the ANDA in question has been accepted
for filing by the FDA. The NDA owner and patent holders may then initiate a patent infringement lawsuit in response to
the notice of the Paragraph IV certification. The filing of a patent infringement lawsuit within 45 days after the receipt of
a Paragraph IV certification automatically prevents the FDA from approving the ANDA until the earlier of 30 months
after the receipt of the Paragraph IV notice, expiration of the patent or a decision in the infringement case that is
favorable to the ANDA applicant.
Pediatric Clinical Trials and Exclusivity
Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003 an NDA or supplement thereto must contain data that are
adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the drug product for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric
subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe
and effective. With enactment of the FDASIA in 2012, sponsors must also submit pediatric trial plans prior to the
assessment data. Those plans must contain an outline of the proposed pediatric trial or trials the applicant plans to
conduct, including trial objectives and design, any deferral or waiver requests and other information required by
regulation. The applicant, the FDA, and the FDA’s internal review committee must then review the information
submitted, consult with each other, and agree upon a final plan. The FDA or the applicant may request an amendment to
the plan at any time.
The FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant, grant deferrals for submission of some or all
pediatric data until after approval of the product for use in adults, or full or partial waivers from the pediatric data
requirements. Additional requirements and procedures relating to deferral requests and requests for extension of
deferrals are contained in FDASIA. Unless otherwise required by regulation, the pediatric data requirements do not
apply to products with orphan designation.
31
Pediatric exclusivity is another type of nonpatent marketing exclusivity in the United States and, if granted,
provides for the attachment of an additional six months of marketing protection to the term of any existing regulatory
exclusivity, including the nonpatent and orphan exclusivity. This six-month exclusivity may be granted if an NDA
sponsor submits pediatric data that fairly respond to a written request from the FDA for such data. The data do not need
to show the product to be effective in the pediatric population studied; rather, if the clinical trial is deemed to fairly
respond to the FDA’s request, the additional protection is granted. If reports of requested pediatric studies are submitted
to and accepted by the FDA within the statutory time limits, whatever statutory or regulatory periods of exclusivity or
patent protection cover the product are extended by six months. This is not a patent term extension, but it effectively
extends the regulatory period during which the FDA cannot approve another application.
Orphan Drug Designation and Exclusivity
The FDA has granted orphan drug designation to odevixibat for the treatment of PFIC, ALGS, biliary atresia and
PBC. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a drug product as an “orphan drug” if it is intended to treat a
rare disease or condition (generally meaning that it affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or more
in cases in which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making a drug product available in
the United States for treatment of the disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product). A company must
request orphan product designation before submitting an NDA. If the designation request is granted, the FDA will
disclose the identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential use. Orphan product designation does not convey any
advantage in or shorten the duration of the regulatory review and approval process.
If a product with orphan status receives the first FDA approval for the disease or condition for which it has such
designation, the product generally will receive orphan product exclusivity. Orphan product exclusivity means that the
FDA may not approve any other applications for the same product for the same indication for seven years, except in
certain limited circumstances. Competitors may receive approval of different products for the indication for which the
orphan product has exclusivity and may obtain approval for the same product but for a different indication. If a drug or
drug product designated as an orphan product ultimately receives marketing approval for an indication broader than what
was designated in its orphan product application, it may not be entitled to exclusivity.
Patent Term Restoration and Extension
The term of a U.S. patent that covers a drug, biological product or approved medical device may also be eligible
for patent term extension when FDA approval is granted, provided that certain statutory and regulatory requirements are
met. The length of the patent term extension is related to the length of time the drug is under regulatory review while the
patent is in force. For drugs, the Hatch-Waxman Act permits a patent term extension of up to five years beyond the
expiration date set for the patent. Patent extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of
14 years from the date of product approval, only one patent applicable to each regulatory review period may be granted
an extension, and only those claims reading on the approved drug may be extended. Similar provisions are available in
Europe and certain other foreign jurisdictions to extend the term of a patent that covers an approved drug, provided that
statutory and regulatory requirements are met. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reviews and approves the
application for any patent term extension or restoration in consultation with the FDA.
Regulation Outside the United States
In order to market any product candidate outside of the United States, a company must also comply with numerous
and varying regulatory requirements of other countries and jurisdictions regarding quality, safety and efficacy and
governing, among other things, clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales and distribution of drug
products. Whether or not it obtains FDA approval for a product candidate, the company would need to obtain the
necessary approvals by the comparable foreign regulatory authorities before it can commence clinical trials or marketing
of a product in those countries or jurisdictions. The approval process ultimately varies between countries and
jurisdictions and can involve additional testing and additional administrative review periods. The time required to obtain
approval in other countries and jurisdictions might differ from and be longer than that required to obtain FDA approval.
32
Regulatory approval in one country or jurisdiction does not ensure regulatory approval in another, but a failure or delay
in obtaining regulatory approval in one country or jurisdiction may negatively impact the regulatory process in others.
Regulation and Marketing Authorization in the European Union
Clinical Trial Approval
Requirements for the conduct of clinical trials in the European Union including Good Clinical Practice, or GCP,
are implemented in the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC and the GCP Directive 2005/28/EC. Pursuant to Directive
2001/20/EC and Directive 2005/28/EC, as amended, a system for the approval of clinical trials in the European Union
has been implemented through national legislation of the member states. Under this system, approval must be obtained
from the competent national authority of an E.U. member state in which a trial is planned to be conducted, or in multiple
member states if the clinical trial is to be conducted in a number of member states. To this end, a CTA is submitted,
which must be supported by an investigational medicinal product dossier, or IMPD, and further supporting information
prescribed by Directive 2001/20/EC and Directive 2005/28/EC and other applicable guidance documents. Furthermore, a
clinical trial may only be started after a competent ethics committee has issued a favorable opinion on the clinical trial
application in that country.
In April 2014, the European Commission passed the new Clinical Trials Regulation, (EU) No 536/2014, which
will replace the current Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC. To ensure that the rules for clinical trials are identical
throughout the European Union, the new E.U. clinical trials legislation was enacted as a regulation that is directly
applicable in all E.U. member states. All clinical trials performed in the European Union are required to be conducted in
accordance with the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC until the new Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No 536/2014
becomes applicable.
The new Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 aims to simplify and streamline the approval of clinical trial in the
European Union. The main characteristics of the regulation include:
•
•
•
•
•
a streamlined application procedure via a single entry point, the E.U. portal;
a single set of documents to be prepared and submitted for the application as well as simplified reporting
procedures that will spare sponsors from submitting broadly identical information separately to various
bodies and different member states;
a harmonized procedure for the assessment of applications for clinical trials, which is divided in two parts
(Part I is assessed jointly by all member states concerned and Part II is assessed separately by each member
state concerned);
strictly defined deadlines for the assessment of clinical trial application; and
the involvement of the ethics committees in the assessment procedure in accordance with the national law of
the member state concerned but within the overall timelines defined by the Regulation (EU) No 536/2014.
PRIME Designation
The European Medicines Agency, or EMA, grants access to the Priority Medicines, or PRIME, program to
investigational medicines for which it determines there to be preliminary data available showing the potential to address
an unmet medical need and bring a major therapeutic advantage to patients. As part of the program, EMA provides early
and enhanced dialogue and support to optimize the development of eligible medicines and speed up their evaluation,
aiming to bring promising treatments to patients sooner. The EMA has granted access to the PRIME program at the
“proof of concept” stage for odevixibat to treat PFIC.
33
Marketing Authorization
Authorization to market a product in the member states of the European Union proceeds under one of four
procedures: a centralized authorization procedure, a mutual recognition procedure, a decentralized procedure or a
national procedure.
Centralized Authorization Procedure
The centralized procedure enables applicants to obtain a marketing authorization that is valid in all E.U. member
states based on a single application. Certain medicinal products, including products developed by means of
biotechnological processes, must undergo the centralized authorization procedure for marketing authorization, which, if
granted by the European Commission, is automatically valid in all 28 E.U. member states. The EMA and the European
Commission administer this centralized authorization procedure pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 726/2004.
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, this procedure is mandatory for various types of products, including,
among others, products that are designated as orphan medicinal products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 141/2000.
The centralized authorization procedure is optional for other medicinal products if they contain a new active
substance or if the applicant shows that the medicinal product concerned constitutes a significant therapeutic, scientific
or technical innovation or that the granting of authorization is in the interest of patients in the European Union.
Administrative Procedure
Under the centralized authorization procedure, the EMA’s Committee for Human Medicinal Products, or CHMP,
serves as the scientific committee that renders opinions about the safety, efficacy and quality of medicinal products for
human use on behalf of the EMA. The CHMP is composed of experts nominated by each member state’s national
authority for medicinal products, with an expert appointed to act as Rapporteur for the co-ordination of the evaluation
with the possible assistance of a further member of the CHMP acting as a Co-Rapporteur. After approval, the
Rapporteur(s) continue to monitor the product throughout its life cycle. The CHMP has 210 days to adopt an opinion as
to whether a marketing authorization should be granted. The process usually takes longer in case additional information
is requested, which triggers clock-stops in the procedural timelines. The process is complex and involves extensive
consultation with the regulatory authorities of member states and a number of experts. When an application is submitted
for a marketing authorization in respect of a drug that is of major interest from the point of view of public health and in
particular from the viewpoint of therapeutic innovation, the applicant may pursuant to Article 14(9) Regulation
(EC) No 726/2004 request an accelerated assessment procedure. If the CHMP accepts such request, the time-limit of
210 days will be reduced to 150 days but it is possible that the CHMP can revert to the standard time-limit for the
centralized procedure if it considers that it is no longer appropriate to conduct an accelerated assessment. Once the
procedure is completed, a European Public Assessment Report, or EPAR, is produced. If the opinion is negative,
information is given as to the grounds on which this conclusion was reached. After the adoption of the CHMP opinion, a
decision on the MAA must be adopted by the European Commission, after consulting the E.U. member states, which in
total can take more than 60 days.
Conditional Approval
In specific circumstances, E.U. legislation (Article 14(7) Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 and Regulation (EC) No
507/2006 on Conditional Marketing Authorizations for Medicinal Products for Human Use) enables applicants to obtain
a conditional marketing authorization prior to obtaining the comprehensive clinical data required for an application for a
full marketing authorization. Such conditional approvals may be granted for product candidates (including medicines
designated as orphan medicinal products) if (1) the risk-benefit balance of the product candidate is positive, (2) it is
likely that the applicant will be in a position to provide the required comprehensive clinical trial data, (3) the product
fulfills unmet medical needs and (4) the benefit to public health of the immediate availability on the market of the
medicinal product concerned outweighs the risk inherent in the fact that additional data are still required. A conditional
marketing authorization may contain specific obligations to be fulfilled by the marketing authorization holder, including
34
obligations with respect to the completion of ongoing or new studies, and with respect to the collection of
pharmacovigilance data. Conditional marketing authorizations are valid for one year, and may be renewed annually, if
the risk-benefit balance remains positive, and after an assessment of the need for additional or modified conditions or
specific obligations. The timelines for the centralized procedure described above also apply with respect to the review by
the CHMP of applications for a conditional marketing authorization.
Marketing Authorization under Exceptional Circumstances
Under Article 14(8) Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, products for which the applicant can demonstrate that
comprehensive data (in line with the requirements laid down in Annex I of Directive 2001/83/EC, as amended) cannot
be provided (due to specific reasons foreseen in the legislation) might be eligible for marketing authorization under
exceptional circumstances. This type of authorization is reviewed annually to reassess the risk-benefit balance. The
fulfillment of any specific procedures/obligations imposed as part of the marketing authorization under exceptional
circumstances is aimed at the provision of information on the safe and effective use of the product and will normally not
lead to the completion of a full dossier/approval.
Market Authorizations Granted by Authorities of E.U. Member States
In general, if the centralized procedure is not followed, there are three alternative procedures as prescribed in
Directive 2001/83/EC:
•
•
•
The decentralized procedure allows applicants to file identical applications to several E.U. member states
and receive simultaneous national approvals based on the recognition by E.U. member states of an
assessment by a reference member state.
The national procedure is only available for products intended to be authorized in a single E.U. member
state.
A mutual recognition procedure similar to the decentralized procedure is available when a marketing
authorization has already been obtained in at least one E.U. member state.
A marketing authorization may be granted only to an applicant established in the European Union.
Pediatric Studies
Prior to obtaining a marketing authorization in the European Union, applicants have to demonstrate compliance
with all measures included in an EMA-approved Pediatric Investigation Plan, or PIP, covering all subsets of the pediatric
population, unless the EMA has granted a product-specific waiver, a class waiver, or a deferral for one or more of the
measures included in the PIP. The respective requirements for all marketing authorization procedures are set forth in
Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006, which is referred to as the Pediatric Regulation. This requirement also applies when a
company wants to add a new indication, pharmaceutical form or route of administration for a medicine that is already
authorized. The Pediatric Committee of the EMA, or PDCO, may grant deferrals for some medicines, allowing a
company to delay development of the medicine in children until there is enough information to demonstrate its
effectiveness and safety in adults. The PDCO may also grant waivers when development of a medicine in children is not
needed or is not appropriate, such as for diseases that only affect the elderly population.
Before a marketing authorization application can be filed, or an existing marketing authorization can be amended,
the EMA determines that companies actually comply with the agreed studies and measures listed in each relevant PIP.
In 2017, the PDCO agreed to our PIP for odevixibat as a treatment for PFIC.
35
Periods of Authorization and Renewals
A marketing authorization is valid for five years in principle and the marketing authorization may be renewed after
five years on the basis of a re-evaluation of the risk-benefit balance by the EMA or by the competent authority of the
authorizing member state. To this end, the marketing authorization holder must provide the EMA or the competent
authority with a consolidated version of the file in respect of quality, safety and efficacy, including all variations
introduced since the marketing authorization was granted, at least six months before the marketing authorization ceases
to be valid. Once renewed, the marketing authorization is valid for an unlimited period, unless the European
Commission or the competent authority decides, on justified grounds relating to pharmacovigilance, to proceed with one
additional five-year renewal. Any authorization which is not followed by the actual placing of the drug on the E.U.
market (in case of centralized procedure) or on the market of the authorizing member state within three years after
authorization ceases to be valid (the so-called sunset clause).
Orphan Drug Designation and Exclusivity
The European Commission, following an evaluation by the EMA’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products,
has designated odevixibat as an orphan medicinal product for the treatment of PFIC, as well as for the treatment of PBC
and ALGS. Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 and Regulation (EC) No. 847/2000, the European Commission
can grant such orphan medicinal product designation to products for which the sponsor can establish that it is intended
for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition affecting not more
than five in 10,000 people in the European Union, or a life threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic
condition in the European Union and that without incentives it is unlikely that sales of the drug in the European Union
would generate a sufficient return to justify the necessary investment. In addition, the sponsor must establish that there is
no other satisfactory method approved in the European Union of diagnosing, preventing or treating the condition, or if
such a method exists, the proposed orphan drug will be of significant benefit to patients.
Orphan drug designation is not a marketing authorization. It is a designation that provides a number of benefits,
including fee reductions, regulatory assistance, and the possibility to apply for a centralized E.U. marketing
authorization, as well as ten years of market exclusivity following marketing authorization of the designated orphan
drug. During this market exclusivity period, neither the EMA, the European Commission nor the member states can
accept an application or grant a marketing authorization for a similar medicinal product. A “similar medicinal product”
is defined as a medicinal product containing a similar active substance or substances as those contained in an authorized
orphan medicinal product and that is intended for the same therapeutic indication. A “similar active substance” is
defined as an active substance that is identical or has the same principal molecular structural features (but not necessarily
all of the same molecular features) and acts via the same mechanism as the authorized orphan medicinal product. The
market exclusivity period for the authorized therapeutic indication may be reduced to six years if, at the end of the
fifth year, it is established that the orphan designation criteria are no longer met, including where it is shown that the
product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of market exclusivity. In addition, a competing similar
medicinal product may in limited circumstances be authorized prior to the expiration of the market exclusivity period,
including if it is shown to be safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior to the already approved orphan drug.
Furthermore, a product can lose orphan designation and the related benefits, prior to us having obtained a marketing
authorization, if it is demonstrated that the orphan designation criteria are no longer met.
Regulatory Data Protection
E.U. legislation also provides for a system of regulatory data and market exclusivity. According to Article 14(11)
of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, as amended, and Article 10(1) of Directive 2001/83/EC, as amended, upon receiving
marketing authorization, new chemical entities approved on the basis of complete independent data package benefit from
eight years of data exclusivity and an additional two years of market exclusivity. Data exclusivity prevents regulatory
authorities in the European Union from referencing the innovator’s data to assess a generic (abbreviated) application.
During the additional two-year period of market exclusivity, a generic marketing authorization can be submitted, and the
innovator’s data may be referenced, but no generic medicinal product can be marketed until the expiration of the market
exclusivity. The overall ten-year period will be extended to a maximum of 11 years if, during the first eight years of
36
those ten years, the marketing authorization holder, or MAH, obtains an authorization for one or more new therapeutic
indications which, during the scientific evaluation prior to their authorization, are held to bring a significant clinical
benefit in comparison with existing therapies. Even if a compound is considered to be a new chemical entity and the
innovator is able to gain the period of data exclusivity, another company nevertheless could also market another version
of the drug if such company obtained marketing authorization based on an MAA with a complete independent data
package of pharmaceutical test, preclinical tests and clinical trials. However, products designated as orphan medicinal
products enjoy, upon receiving marketing authorization, a period of ten years of orphan market exclusivity—see also
“Orphan Drug Designation and Exclusivity.” Depending upon the timing and duration of the E.U. marketing
authorization process, products may be eligible for up to five years’ supplementary protection certificates, or SPCs,
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 469/2009. Such SPCs extend the rights under the basic patent for the drug.
Regulatory Requirements After a Marketing Authorization has been Obtained
If we obtain authorization for a medicinal product in the European Union, we will be required to comply with a
range of requirements applicable to the manufacturing, marketing, promotion and sale of medicinal products:
Pharmacovigilance and Other Requirements
We will, for example, have to comply with the E.U.’s stringent pharmacovigilance or safety reporting rules,
pursuant to which post-authorization studies and additional monitoring obligations can be imposed. Other requirements
relate, for example, to the manufacturing of products and APIs in accordance with good manufacturing practice
standards. E.U. regulators may conduct inspections to verify our compliance with applicable requirements, and we will
have to continue to expend time, money and effort to remain compliant. Noncompliance with E.U. requirements
regarding safety monitoring or pharmacovigilance, or requirements related to the development of products for the
pediatric population, can also result in significant financial penalties in the European Union. Similarly, failure to comply
with the E.U.’s requirements regarding the protection of individual personal data can also lead to significant penalties
and sanctions. Individual E.U. member states may also impose various sanctions and penalties in case we do not comply
with locally applicable requirements.
Manufacturing
The manufacturing of authorized drugs, for which a separate manufacturer’s license is mandatory, must be
conducted in strict compliance with the EMA’s cGMP requirements and comparable requirements of other regulatory
bodies in the European Union, which mandate the methods, facilities and controls used in manufacturing, processing and
packing of drugs to assure their safety and identity. The EMA enforces its cGMP requirements through mandatory
registration of facilities and inspections of those facilities. The EMA may have a coordinating role for these inspections
although the responsibility for carrying them out rests with the member states’ competent authority under whose
responsibility the manufacturer falls. Failure to comply with these requirements could interrupt supply and result in
delays, unanticipated costs and lost revenues, and could subject the applicant to potential legal or regulatory action,
including but not limited to warning letters, suspension of manufacturing, seizure of product, injunctive action or
possible civil and criminal penalties.
Marketing and Promotion
The marketing and promotion of authorized drugs, including industry-sponsored continuing medical education and
advertising directed toward the prescribers of drugs or the general public, are strictly regulated in the European Union
under Directive 2001/83/EC. The applicable regulations aim to ensure that information provided by holders of marketing
authorizations regarding their products is truthful, balanced and accurately reflects the safety and efficacy claims
authorized by the EMA or by the competent authority of the authorizing member state. Failure to comply with these
requirements can result in adverse publicity, warning letters, corrective advertising and potential civil and criminal
penalties.
37
Patent Term Extension
In order to compensate the patentee for delays in obtaining a marketing authorization for a patented product, an
SPC may be granted extending the exclusivity period for that specific product by up to five years. Applications for SPCs
must be made to the relevant patent office in each E.U. member state and the granted certificates are valid only in the
member state of grant. An application has to be made by the patent owner within six months of the first marketing
authorization being granted in the European Union (assuming the patent in question has not expired, lapsed or been
revoked) or within six months of the grant of the patent (if the marketing authorization is granted first). In the context of
SPCs, the term “product” means the active ingredient or combination of active ingredients for a medicinal product and
the term “patent” means a patent protecting such a product or a new manufacturing process or application for it. The
duration of an SPC is calculated as the difference between the patent’s filing date and the date of the first marketing
authorization, minus five years, subject to a maximum term of five years.
A six month pediatric extension of an SPC may be obtained where the patentee has carried out an agreed pediatric
investigation plan, the authorized product information includes information on the results of the studies and the product
is authorized in all member states of the European Union.
Brexit and the Regulatory Framework in the United Kingdom
In June 2016, the electorate in the United Kingdom voted in favor of leaving the European Union (commonly
referred to as “Brexit”). Following the formation of a majority Conservative government in December 2019, the United
Kingdom approved the withdrawal agreement and left the European Union on January 31, 2020, with a transitional
period that expired on December 31, 2020. In connection with Brexit, the United Kingdom and the European Union
entered into a trade agreement known as the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, which is provisionally applicable as of
January 1, 2021 but has not yet been ratified by the European Parliament. This agreement is intended to govern the legal
relationship between the European Union and the United Kingdom post-Brexit. We are currently evaluating the potential
impacts of the new Trade and Cooperation Agreement on our business.
Since the regulatory framework for pharmaceutical products in the United Kingdom covering quality, safety and
efficacy of pharmaceutical products, clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales and distribution of
pharmaceutical products was, prior to Brexit, derived from European Union directives and regulations, and the
implementation of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement could materially impact the future regulatory regime which
applies to products and the approval of product candidates in the United Kingdom. It remains to be seen how, if at all,
Brexit and the implementation of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement will impact regulatory requirements for product
candidates and products in the United Kingdom.
Pharmaceutical Coverage, Pricing and Reimbursement
Sales of products approved by the FDA will depend, in part, on the extent to which the costs of the products will
be covered by third-party payors, including government health programs in the United States such as Medicare and
Medicaid, commercial health insurers and managed care organizations. The process for determining whether a payor will
provide coverage for a product may be separate from the process for setting the price or reimbursement rate that the
payor will pay for the product once coverage is approved. Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific products on
an approved list, or formulary, which might not include all of the approved products for a particular indication.
In order to secure coverage and reimbursement for any product that might be approved for sale, a company may
need to conduct expensive pharmacoeconomic studies in order to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost-
effectiveness of the product, in addition to the costs required to obtain FDA or other comparable regulatory approvals. A
payor’s decision to provide coverage for a drug product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be
approved. Third-party reimbursement may not be sufficient to maintain price levels high enough to realize an
appropriate return on investment in product development.
38
In the European Union, pricing and reimbursement schemes vary widely from country to country. Some countries
provide that drug products may be marketed only after a reimbursement price has been agreed. Some countries may
require the completion of additional studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of our product candidate to currently
available therapies (so called health technology assessment, or HTA) in order to obtain reimbursement or pricing
approval. For example, the European Union provides options for its member states to restrict the range of drug products
for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to control the prices of medicinal products
for human use. E.U. member states may approve a specific price for a drug product or it may instead adopt a system of
direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the drug product on the market. Other member
states allow companies to fix their own prices for drug products but monitor and control prescription volumes and issue
guidance to physicians to limit prescriptions. The downward pressure on health care costs in general, particularly
prescription drugs, has become intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of new
products. In addition, there can be considerable pressure by governments and other stakeholders on prices and
reimbursement levels, including as part of cost containment measures. Political, economic and regulatory developments
may further complicate pricing negotiations, and pricing negotiations may continue after reimbursement has been
obtained. Reference pricing used by various E.U. member states, and parallel distribution (arbitrage between low-priced
and high-priced member states), can further reduce prices. Any country that has price controls or reimbursement
limitations for drug products may not allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements.
Healthcare Law and Regulation
If our product candidates are approved in the United States, we will have to comply with various U.S. federal and
state laws, rules and regulations pertaining to healthcare fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback laws and physician
self-referral laws, rules and regulations. Violations of the fraud and abuse laws are punishable by criminal and civil
sanctions, including, in some instances, exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, including
Medicare and Medicaid. These laws include:
•
•
•
•
•
the federal anti-kickback statute prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully
soliciting, offering, receiving or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or
reward either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or
service, for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program such as
Medicare and Medicaid;
the federal False Claims Act imposes civil penalties, and provides for civil whistleblower or qui tam actions,
against individuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal
government, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or
conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government;
the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, imposes criminal and
civil liability for executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements
relating to healthcare matters;
HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or
HITECH Act, and its implementing regulations, also imposes obligations, including mandatory contractual
terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health
information;
the federal transparency requirements under the Physician Payments Sunshine Act require manufacturers of
FDA-approved drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies covered by Medicare or Medicaid to report,
on an annual basis, to the Department of Health and Human Services information related to payments and
other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals and physician ownership and investment
interests; and
39
•
analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, may
apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by
nongovernmental third-party payors, including private insurers.
Some state laws require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary
compliance guidelines, or the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government, in addition to
requiring drug manufacturers to report information related to payments to physicians and other health care providers or
marketing expenditures to the extent that those laws impose requirements that are more stringent than the Physician
Payments Sunshine Act. State and foreign laws also govern the privacy and security of health information in some
circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus
complicating compliance efforts.
Employees
As of January 15, 2021, we employed 90 full-time employees, of whom 23 hold Ph.D. or M.D. degrees, or the
foreign equivalent. Of these employees, 51 were engaged in research and development and 39 were engaged in general
and administrative functions. Our headquarters are in Boston, MA and we have a research site in Gothenburg Sweden.
Our employees in Sweden are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relationship with our
employees to be good.
The Company recognizes that our industry is specialized and dynamic, and a significant aspect of our success is
our continued ability to execute our human capital strategy of attracting, engaging, developing and retaining highly
skilled talent. There is fierce competition both within our industry and in the geographic locations in which we have
offices for highly skilled talent, and we offer a robust set of benefits, career-enhancing learning experiences and
initiatives aligned with our mission, vision, and values in order to attract qualified prospective employees and to retain
and motivate our employees. We offer competitive compensation for our employees and strongly embrace a pay for
performance philosophy in setting and adjusting compensation.
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics clearly outlines our unwavering commitment to diversity and inclusion,
where all employees are welcomed in an environment designed to make them feel comfortable, respected, and accepted
regardless of their age, race, national origin, gender, religion, disability or sexual orientation. We have a set of policies
explicitly setting forth our expectations for nondiscrimination and a harassment-free work environment. We are also a
proud equal opportunity employer and cultivate a highly collaborative and entrepreneurial culture.
Corporate Information
Our internet address is http://www.albireopharma.com. The information contained on, or that can be accessed
through, our website is not a part of or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our annual
reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those
reports, are available to you free of charge through the Media & Investors section of our website as soon as reasonably
practicable after such materials have been electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risk Factor Summary
We are providing the following summary of the risk factors contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to
enhance the readability and accessibility of our risk factor disclosures. We encourage you to carefully review the full risk
factors contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in their entirety for additional information regarding the material
40
factors that make an investment in our securities speculative or risky. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not
limited to, the following:
• We have incurred significant losses since our inception. We expect to continue to incur losses and may never
generate profits from operations or maintain profitability.
• We will need substantial additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced
to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.
• We depend heavily on the success of our lead product candidate, odevixibat, which we are developing initially
for the treatment of patients with PFIC and potentially also for other pediatric cholestatic liver diseases and
disorders. If we are unable to commercialize odevixibat or experience significant delays in doing so, our
business will be materially harmed.
•
If clinical trials of odevixibat or any of our other product candidates fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy to
the satisfaction of the FDA or the EMA, or do not otherwise produce favorable results satisfactory to the FDA
or EMA, we may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to
complete, the development and commercialization of the applicable product candidate.
• Favorable results seen to date in clinical trials of odevixibat, including our Phase 3 trial of odevixibat in
patients with PFIC, may not be predictive of favorable results in our ongoing BOLD pivotal trial of odevixibat
in biliary atresia or our ongoing ASSERT pivotal trial of odevixibat in ALGS.
• The clinical trial designs, durations, endpoints and outcomes that will be required to obtain marketing
approval of odevixibat to treat PFIC patients are uncertain and, in any case, may vary among the FDA, EMA
and other regulatory authorities outside of the United States and Europe. Based on feedback that we have
received from the FDA and the EMA, we expect both regulatory authorities to place a greater emphasis on the
totality of the data from our Phase 3 clinical trial, including secondary endpoints, than may generally be
expected. As a result, there is risk that, even though the primary endpoint of our Phase 3 clinical trial of
odevixibat for FDA evaluation purposes and the primary endpoint for EMA evaluation purposes were both
met with statistical significance, the applicable regulatory authority may not find the overall results of our
Phase 3 trial to be sufficient to support marketing approval of odevixibat to treat PFIC, a symptom of PFIC
such as pruritus or any other indication, and we may never receive marketing approval.
• We cannot be assured that either the FDA or EMA will complete their respective reviews of our submissions
for approval of odevixibat within the target timelines, including the FDA’s Prescription Drug User Fee Act
goal date of July 20, 2021, as a potential result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise.
• The design of our Phase 3 clinical trial of odevixibat in patients with PFIC does not conform precisely in all
respects to the recommendations or preferences expressed by either the FDA or EMA.
•
•
•
If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrollment of patients in our pivotal clinical trials of odevixibat
in patients with biliary atresia and ALGS, our receipt of marketing approval for odevixibat in those
indications could be delayed or prevented.
If the commercial opportunity in PFIC is smaller than we anticipate, or if odevixibat receives approval to treat
only a specific subpopulation of patients with PFIC or only a specific symptom of PFIC such as pruritus, our
future revenue from odevixibat may be adversely affected and our business may suffer.
If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to
market and sell odevixibat or any of our other current or potential future product candidates, we may not be
successful in commercializing the applicable product candidate if it receives marketing approval.
• We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing
products to treat our target indications or markets before or more successfully than we do.
41
• Use of third parties to manufacture our product candidates may increase the risk that we will not have
sufficient quantities of our product candidates or products or such quantities at an acceptable cost, which
could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts.
•
If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for our technology and products, or if the scope of
the patent protection is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize technology
and products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our technology and
products may be adversely affected.
• Even if we complete the necessary clinical trials, the marketing approval process is expensive, time
consuming and uncertain and may prevent us from obtaining approvals for the commercialization of some or
all of our product candidates. If we are not able to obtain, or if there are delays in obtaining, required
marketing approvals, we will not be able to commercialize our product candidates, and our ability to generate
revenue will be materially impaired.
• The outbreak of the novel strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, could adversely
impact our business, including our preclinical studies and clinical trials and the commercialization of any
approved product.
The terms of our loan and security agreement with Hercules Capital, Inc. require us to meet certain operating
covenants and place restrictions on our operating and financial flexibility. If we raise additional capital through debt
financing, the terms of any new debt could further restrict our ability to operate our business.
Risk Factors
An investment in shares of our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the
following information about these risks, together with the other information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto, before deciding to invest in
our common stock. The occurrence of any of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects. In these circumstances, the market price of our
common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital
We have incurred significant losses since our inception. We expect to continue to incur losses and may never
generate profits from operations or maintain profitability.
Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net loss was approximately $107.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2020 and approximately $62.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. We had an
accumulated deficit of $266.8 million as of December 31, 2020. To date, we have financed our operations primarily
through issuances of shares of common stock, preference shares or convertible loan notes, upfront fees paid upon
entering into or amending license agreements, payments received upon the achievement of specified milestone events
under the license agreements, grants, venture debt borrowings, and the HCR royalty monetization transactions.. We have
devoted substantially all of our efforts to research and development, including clinical trials. We have not completed the
development of any drugs, although our licensee, EA Pharma has received approval in Japan of our product candidate
elobixibat to treat chronic constipation. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating
losses for at least the next few years as we continue our development of, and seek marketing approvals for, our product
candidates, prepare for and begin the commercialization of any approved products, and add infrastructure and personnel
to support our product development efforts and operations as a public company in the United States. The net losses we
incur may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year.
42
Our ability to generate profits from operations and thereafter to remain profitable depends heavily on:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
any unfavorable development or delay in our odevixibat program in PFIC, including the review or approval
of our odevixibat marketing applications we submitted in the fourth quarter of 2020 in the United States and
Europe for PFIC and the costs and timing of our pre-commercialization preparations;
the costs, design, duration and any potential delays of the pivotal clinical trial of odevixibat in biliary atresia
and pivotal trial of odevixibat in ALGS;
the scope, number, progress, initiation, duration, cost, results and timing of clinical trials and nonclinical
studies of our current or future product candidates;
whether and to what extent milestone events are achieved under our license agreement with EA Pharma or
any potential future licensee or collaborator;
the outcomes and timing of regulatory reviews, approvals or other actions;
our ability to obtain marketing approval for our product candidates;
our ability to establish and maintain additional licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements on favorable
terms and whether and to what extent we retain development or commercialization responsibilities under any
new licensing, collaboration or similar arrangement;
the success of any other business, product or technology that we acquire or in which we invest;
our ability to maintain, expand and defend the scope of our intellectual property portfolio;
our ability to manufacture any approved products on commercially reasonable terms;
our ability to establish a sales and marketing organization or suitable third-party alternatives for any
approved product;
the number and characteristics of product candidates and programs that we pursue.
the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business;
the costs of acquiring, licensing or investing in businesses, product candidates and technologies;
our need and ability to hire additional management and scientific and medical personnel;
the costs to operate as a public company in the United States, including the need to implement additional
financial and reporting systems and other internal systems and infrastructure for our business;
market acceptance of our product candidates, to the extent any are approved for commercial sale; and
the effect of competing technological and market developments.
Based on our current plans, we do not expect to generate significant revenue from product sales unless and until
we or a potential future licensee or collaborator obtains marketing approval for, and commercializes, one or more of our
current or potential future product candidates (other than elobixibat as a treatment for chronic constipation in Japan),
which we do not expect to occur until at least the second half of 2021, if at all. Neither we nor a licensee may ever
succeed in obtaining marketing approval for, or commercializing, our product candidates besides elobixibat as a
43
treatment for chronic constipation in Japan and, even if we do, may never generate revenues that are significant enough
to generate profits from operations. Even if we do generate profits from operations, we may not be able to sustain or
increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to generate profits from operations and remain profitable
would decrease our value and could impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, maintain our research and
development efforts, diversify our product offerings or continue our operations. A decline in our value could also cause
you to lose all or part of your investment.
We will need substantial additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced
to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.
We expect our research and development expenses to increase substantially in future periods, particularly as we
advance the development of our lead product candidate odevixibat beyond its development as a treatment for patients
with PFIC into other pediatric cholestatic liver diseases and disorders, such as our development of odevixibat as a
treatment for biliary atresia and as a treatment for ALGS. In addition, we expect that our research and development
expenses would increase if we initiate additional preclinical programs for potential future product candidates. In
addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates that are not then subject to licensing,
collaboration or similar arrangements with third parties, we expect to continue to incur significant commercialization
expenses related to product sales, marketing, distribution and manufacturing. Furthermore, we expect to incur additional
costs associated with operating as a public company in the United States. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial
additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on
attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or any future
commercialization efforts.
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
whether the FDA and the EMA determines that our Phase 3 clinical trial of odevixibat in PFIC is or is not
sufficient for regulatory approval to treat PFIC, a symptom of PFIC, a specific PFIC subtype(s) or otherwise;
our ability to establish a sales and marketing organization for the potential commercialization of odevixibat
in patients with PFIC, or a sales and marketing organization or suitable third-party alternatives for any other
product candidate, if approved;
the costs, design, duration and any potential delays of the pivotal trial of odevixibat in biliary atresia or the
pivotal trial of odevixibat in ALGS;
the same factors that our ability to generate profits from operations and thereafter to remain profitable
depend heavily on, as described above under “— We have incurred significant losses since our inception.
We expect to continue to incur losses and may never generate profits from operations or maintain
profitability.”;
the scope, number, progress, duration, cost, results and timing of clinical trials and nonclinical studies of our
current or future product candidates;
the outcomes and timing of regulatory reviews, approvals or other actions;
our ability to obtain marketing approval for our product candidates;
our ability to establish and maintain additional licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements on favorable
terms and whether and to what extent we retain development or commercialization responsibilities under any
new licensing, collaboration or similar arrangement;
the success of any other business, product or technology that we acquire or in which we invest;
44
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
our ability to maintain, expand and defend the scope of our intellectual property portfolio;
our ability to manufacture any approved products on commercially reasonable terms;
the number and characteristics of product candidates and programs that we pursue;
the costs of acquiring, licensing or investing in businesses, product candidates and technologies;
our need and ability to hire additional management and scientific and medical personnel;
the costs to operate as a public company in the United States, including the need to implement additional
financial and reporting systems and other internal systems and infrastructure for our business;
market acceptance of our product candidates, to the extent any are approved for commercial sale; and
the effect of competing technological and market developments.
Conducting preclinical testing and clinical trials is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that
takes years to complete, and we may never generate the necessary data or results required to obtain marketing approval
and achieve product sales. In addition, our product candidates, if approved, may not achieve commercial success. Our
commercial revenues, if any, will be derived from sales of products that will not be commercially available for sale by us
until at least the second half of 2021, if at all. Accordingly, we will need to continue to rely on additional financing to
achieve our business objectives. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or
strategic considerations, even if we believe that we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans.
Additional financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. The unavailability of additional financing
on acceptable terms, or at all, would have an adverse effect on your investment.
Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our investors, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish
rights to our technologies or product candidates.
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs
through a combination of equity offerings, licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements, grants and debt financings.
We do not have any committed external source of funds. On May 7, 2020, we filed a universal shelf registration on
Form S-3 with the SEC, which was declared effective on May 18, 2020, pursuant to which we registered for sale up to
$200 million of any combination of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, rights and/or units
from time to time and at prices and on terms that we may determine, including up to $50 million of our common stock
available for issuance pursuant to an at-the-market offering program sales agreement that we entered into with Cowen
and Company, LLC, or Cowen, in May 2020. The agreement was terminated on September 9, 2020. As of December 31,
2020, $40.0 million of securities remain available for issuance under the shelf registration statement. We refer to this
registration statement as the 2020 Form S-3. On or about February 25, 2021, we expect to file a new universal shelf
registration on Form S-3 with the SEC, pursuant to which we expect to register for sale up to $400 million of any
combination of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, rights and/or units from time to time and at
prices and on terms that we may determine, which we refer to as the 2021 Form S-3. On or about February 25, 2021, we
intend to enter into a new sales agreement, which we refer to as the 2021 Sales Agreement, with respect to an at-the-
market offering program under which we may offer and sell, from time to time at our sole discretion, shares of our
common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $100 million. Our issuance and sale, if any, of shares under
the 2021 Sales Agreement that we intend to enter into are subject to the effectiveness of the 2021 Form S-3. We make no
assurances as to if or when the 2021 Form S-3 will become effective or, if it does become effective, as to the continued
effectiveness of the 2021 Form S-3. No additional securities registered under the 2020 Form S-3 will be offered or sold
after the date of effectiveness of the 2021 Form S-3. This report shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of
an offer to buy any shares under the 2021 Sales Agreement that we intend to enter into or any securities under the 2021
Form S-3 that we intend to file with the SEC, nor shall there be any sale of such securities in any state in which such
offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such
state.
45
We may seek to raise additional capital at any time. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale
of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may
include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a holder of our common stock. Debt
financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific
actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends or other distributions.
If we raise additional funds through licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements, we may have to relinquish
valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research and development programs or product candidates or
to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or
debt financings or other arrangements when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product
development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would
otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.
Inadequate funding for the FDA, the SEC and other government agencies, or a work slowdown or stoppage at
those agencies as part of a broader federal government shutdown, could hinder their ability to hire and retain key
leadership and other personnel, prevent new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a
timely manner, or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions on which the
operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business.
The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including
government budget and funding levels, ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and
statutory, regulatory and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result.
In addition, funding of government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and
development activities, is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.
Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or
approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last
several years, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the
SEC, have had to furlough critical FDA, SEC and other government employees and stop critical activities. If a prolonged
government shutdown recurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our
regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, future government
shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly
capitalize and continue our operations.
The continuing outbreak of the novel strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, could
adversely impact our business, including our preclinical studies and clinical trials.
Public health crises such as pandemics or similar outbreaks could adversely impact our business. In
December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19),
surfaced in Wuhan, China. Since then, COVID-19 has spread to countries across the world, including the United States.
In response to the spread of COVID-19, we have closed our executive offices with our administrative employees
continuing their work outside of our offices, restricted on-site staff to only those required to execute their job
responsibilities and limited the number of staff in any given research and development laboratory.
As a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, or similar pandemics, we have and may in the future experience
disruptions that could severely impact our business, preclinical studies and clinical trials, including:
•
•
•
delays or difficulties in enrolling patients in our clinical trials;
delays or difficulties in clinical site initiation, including difficulties in recruiting clinical site investigators and
clinical site staff;
delays or disruptions in preclinical studies or clinical trials due to unforeseen circumstances at contract
research organizations and vendors along their supply chain;
46
•
•
•
•
•
•
increased rates of patients withdrawing from our clinical trials following enrollment as a result of contracting
COVID-19, being forced to quarantine, or not being willing to travel to clinical trial sites;
diversion of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials, including the diversion of
hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials;
interruption of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site data monitoring, due to limitations on
travel imposed or recommended by federal or state governments, employers and others or interruption of
clinical trial subject visits and study procedures (particularly any procedures that may be deemed non-
essential), which may impact the integrity of subject data and clinical study endpoints;
interruption or delays in the operations of the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory agencies, which may
impact approval timelines, as described further below under “Risks Related to the Development and
Commercialization of Our Product Candidates - Our pending NDA seeking approval to market
odevixibat for the treatment of patients with PFIC may be delayed as a result of ongoing COVID-19 travel
restrictions and safety protocols that could affect FDA’s ability to conduct a pre-approval inspection of
the drug product’s manufacturing facility, or as a result of operational delays at the FDA or the EMA due
to a redeployment of staff or other resources as part of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic.”
interruption of, or delays in receiving, supplies of our product candidates from our contract manufacturing
organizations due to staffing shortages, production slowdowns or stoppages and disruptions in delivery
systems; and
limitations on employee resources that would otherwise be focused on the conduct of our preclinical studies
and clinical trials, including because of sickness of employees or their families, the desire of employees to
avoid contact with large groups of people, continued reliance on working from home or mass transit
disruptions.
These and other factors arising from the COVID-19 pandemic could worsen in countries that are already afflicted
with COVID-19, could continue to spread to additional countries, or could return to countries where the pandemic has
been partially contained, each of which could further adversely impact our ability to conduct clinical trials and our
business generally, and could have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial condition and results.
In addition, the trading prices for our common stock and the securities of other biopharmaceutical companies have
been highly volatile as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, we may face difficulties raising capital through
sales of our common stock or such sales may be on unfavorable terms. The COVID-19 outbreak continues to rapidly
evolve. The extent to which the outbreak may impact our business, preclinical studies and clinical trials will depend on
future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, such as the ultimate
geographic spread of the disease, the duration of the outbreak, travel restrictions and actions to contain the outbreak or
treat its impact, such as social distancing and quarantines or lock-downs in the United States and other countries,
business closures or business disruptions and the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries
to contain and treat the disease.
The terms of our loan and security agreement with Hercules Capital require us to meet certain operating
covenants and place restrictions on our operating and financial flexibility. If we raise additional capital through debt
financing, the terms of any new debt could further restrict our ability to operate our business.
On June 8, 2020, we entered into a loan and security agreement, or the Loan Agreement, with Hercules Capital,
Inc., in its capacity as administrative and collateral agent for itself and the other Lenders party to the Loan Agreement.
The loan advanced under the Loan Agreement, or the Term Loan, is secured by a security interest covering our assets,
other than our intellectual property and other customary collateral exclusions. The Loan Agreement contains customary
affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. Affirmative covenants include, among others, covenants
requiring us to maintain our legal existence and comply with all applicable laws, deliver certain financial reports,
47
maintain a minimum cash balance, and maintain insurance coverage. Negative covenants include, among others,
covenants restricting us from transferring any part of our business or intellectual property, incurring additional
indebtedness, engaging in mergers or acquisitions, repurchasing shares, paying dividends or making other distributions,
making investments, and creating other liens on our assets, including our intellectual property, in each case subject to
customary exceptions. If we raise any additional debt financing, the terms of such additional debt could further restrict
our operating and financial flexibility. These restrictions may include, among other things, limitations on borrowing and
specific restrictions on the use of our assets, as well as prohibitions on our ability to create liens, pay dividends, redeem
capital stock or make investments. If we default under the terms of the Loan Agreement or any future debt facility, the
Lenders may accelerate all of our repayment obligations and take control of our pledged assets, potentially requiring us
to renegotiate our agreement on terms less favorable to us or to immediately cease operations. Further, if we are
liquidated, the Lenders’ right to repayment would be senior to the rights of the holders of our common stock. The
Lenders could declare a default upon the occurrence of any event that it interprets as a material adverse effect as defined
under the Loan Agreement. Any declaration by the Lenders of an event of default could significantly harm our business
and prospects and could cause the price of our common stock to decline. If we raise any additional debt financing, the
terms of such additional debt could further restrict our operating and financial flexibility.
Repayment of the Term Loan will require a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash
flow from our business to make payments on our indebtedness.
Our ability to pay the principal of and/or interest on the Term Loan depends on our future performance, which is
subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may not generate cash
flow from operations in the future sufficient to service the Term Loan or other future indebtedness and make necessary
capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt and implement one or
more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring indebtedness or obtaining additional debt financing or equity
financing on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. Our ability to refinance the Term Loan or other future
indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. We may not be able to engage
in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt
obligations, including the Term Loan.
Risks Related to the Development and Commercialization of Our Product Candidates
We depend heavily on the success of our lead product candidate, odevixibat, which we are developing initially
for the treatment of patients with PFIC and potentially also for other pediatric cholestatic liver diseases and
disorders. If we are unable to commercialize odevixibat or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will
be materially harmed.
Odevixibat is in Phase 3 clinical development. Elobixibat has been approved in Japan for the treatment of chronic
constipation, but we will not receive additional cash in respect of elobixibat in Japan as a result of our RIAA. Our other
most advanced product candidates are in Phase 2 or earlier-stage development.
Our ability to generate product revenues, which may not occur until at least the end of 2021, if at all, will depend
heavily on the approval of our NDA by the FDA and our MAA by the EMA and the successful commercialization of
odevixibat as a treatment for patients with PFIC. Our ability to generate product revenues also depends on the successful
development and commercialization of odevixibat to treat patients with biliary atresia or ALGS or A3907 or A2342 to
treat adult liver and viral diseases. The success of each of these product candidates will depend on a number of factors,
including the following:
•
•
receipt of marketing approval from the FDA and the EMA for odevixibat for the treatment of patients with
PFIC and marketing approvals for other indications or product candidates from applicable regulatory
authorities;
our ability to obtain additional capital, whether from potential future licensing, collaboration or similar
arrangements or from any future offering of our debt or equity securities;
48
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
our ability to identify and enter into potential future licenses or other collaboration arrangements with third
parties and the terms of the arrangements;
completion of clinical development with successful outcomes;
establishing commercial manufacturing arrangements with third-party manufacturers;
obtaining and maintaining patent and trade secret protection and regulatory exclusivity;
protecting our rights in our intellectual property portfolio;
establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities;
generating commercial sales of odevixibat, A3907 or A2342, as applicable, if and when approved, whether
alone or in collaboration with others;
acceptance of odevixibat, A3907 or A2342, as applicable, if and when approved, by patients, the medical
community and third-party payors;
effectively competing with other therapies; and
maintaining an acceptable safety profile of odevixibat, A3907 or A2342, as applicable, following approval.
If we do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant
delays or an inability to successfully commercialize odevixibat, A3907 or A2342, which would materially harm our
business.
If clinical trials of odevixibat or any of our other product candidates fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy to
the satisfaction of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, or the European Medicines Agency, or the
EMA, or do not otherwise produce favorable results, we may incur additional costs or experience delays in
completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of the applicable product
candidate.
In connection with obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of any product candidate,
we must complete preclinical development and then conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and
efficacy of our product candidates in humans. Clinical trials are expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take
many years to complete and are uncertain as to outcome. A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of
testing. The outcome of preclinical testing and early clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical
trials. In particular, the small number of subjects and patients in our early clinical trials may make the results of these
clinical trials less predictive of the outcome of later clinical trials. The design of a clinical trial can determine whether its
results will support approval of a product candidate, and flaws in the design of a clinical trial may not become apparent
until the clinical trial is well advanced or completed. There is no assurance that we will be able to design and execute a
clinical trial to support marketing approval. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying
interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in
preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their product candidates.
If we are required to conduct additional or longer clinical trials or other testing of odevixibat or any of our other
product candidates beyond those that we currently contemplate, if we are unable to successfully complete our clinical
trials or other testing, or if the results of these clinical trials or tests are not positive or are only modestly positive or if
there are safety concerns, we may:
•
be delayed in obtaining marketing approval for our product candidates;
49
•
•
•
•
•
not obtain marketing approval at all;
obtain approval for indications or patient populations that are not as broad as we intended or desired;
obtain approval with labeling that includes significant use or distribution restrictions or safety warnings,
including boxed warnings;
be subject to additional post-marketing testing requirements or restrictions; or
have the product removed from the market after obtaining marketing approval.
Following consultation with the FDA and EMA, we used change in pruritus as the primary endpoint for
purposes of FDA evaluation and as a key secondary endpoint for EMA evaluation in our recently completed Phase 3
trial in PFIC patients. There was no clinical experience with the two outcome instruments that we used in the trial
and either may not be considered adequately reliable or valid for use in PFIC patients.
In September 2020, we announced topline results from our Phase 3 trial in PFIC, and in December 2020, we
announced that we submitted an NDA to the FDA and an MAA to the EMA, with the EMA granting accelerated
assessment, seeking approval of odevixibat for the treatment of patients with PFIC. The Phase 3 trial in PFIC met its two
primary endpoints. In January 2021 we announced the FDA accepted our NDA, granting priority review and a user fee
goal date under PDUFA of July 20, 2021. The primary endpoint for FDA evaluation, and a key secondary endpoint for
EMA evaluation, was an assessment of change in pruritus. Because the assessment of pruritus relies on subjective
caregiver feedback, it is challenging to evaluate and measure consistently and, for any patient, a caregiver-reported
outcome may vary from the patient’s self-reported outcome. The measure of pruritus can be influenced by factors
outside of our control and can vary widely from measurement point to measurement point for a particular patient, from
patient to patient and from site to site within a clinical trial.
We developed caregiver-reported and patient-reported outcome instruments to assess pruritus in the Phase 3 PFIC
trial. These outcome instruments, and the manner in which they are analyzed, represent novel endpoints and
measurement methodologies with which the FDA, EMA and other regulatory authorities have no experience.
Notwithstanding the positive results in the Phase 3 trial, the FDA or EMA may ultimately determine that either of these
outcome instruments is not adequately reliable or valid for use with PFIC patients, whether because it was not applied by
clinical investigators sufficiently consistently, was not sufficiently sensitive to detect varying degrees of pruritus, or for
any other reason. If this were to occur, our ability to obtain marketing approval for odevixibat would be delayed and we
may never obtain marketing approval for odevixibat.
Our pending NDA seeking approval to market odevixibat for the treatment of patients with PFIC may be
delayed as a result of ongoing COVID-19 travel restrictions and safety protocols that could affect FDA’s ability to
conduct a pre-approval inspection of the drug product’s manufacturing facility, or as a result of operational delays at
the FDA or the EMA due to a redeployment of staff or other resources as part of the global response to the
COVID-19 pandemic.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in March 2020, the FDA announced its intention to temporarily postpone
most inspections of foreign manufacturing facilities and products, as well as routine surveillance inspections of domestic
manufacturing facilities, and it also provided guidance regarding the conduct of clinical trials, which has since been
further updated several times. As of June 23, 2020, the FDA noted it was continuing to ensure timely reviews of
applications for medical products during the COVID-19 pandemic in line with its user fee performance goals and
conducting mission-critical domestic and foreign inspections to ensure compliance of manufacturing facilities with FDA
quality standards. The FDA subsequently publicized its development and use of an internal rating system called the
COVID-19 Advisory Rating system, to assist in determining when and where it is safest to conduct such inspections
based on data about the virus’s trajectory in a given country, state and locality and the rules and guidelines that are put in
place by foreign, state and local governments. As of February 2021, FDA is either continuing to, on a case-by-case basis,
conduct only “mission-critical” inspections, or, where possible to do so safely, resuming prioritized domestic
50
inspections, which generally include pre-approval inspections (PAIs). Foreign PAIs that are not deemed mission-critical
remain postponed, while those deemed mission-critical will be considered for inspection on a case-by-case basis. FDA
will use similar data to inform resumption of other prioritized operations abroad as it becomes feasible and advisable to
do so.
During the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic, moreover, there have been strategic redeployments of
government resources to priority projects, including FDA and EMA resources and staff, which could have an impact on
the timeline for review and approval of new marketing applications. Since the start of the pandemic, the FDA’s new drug
review programs continued to meet key performance goals related to working with applicants and approving NDAs and
NDA supplements, although the agency has also stated that the uncertainty of the COVID-19 situation may make it
difficult to sustain that level of performance indefinitely. The FDA may not be able to maintain its normal pace with
respect to new drug applications and delays or setbacks are possible in the future. The FDA has told industry that it
intends to be as transparent as possible about its workload and performance metrics as the situation evolves, and also that
it intends to communicate proactively with applicants during the review cycle regarding the need for a pre-approval
inspection and whether such PAI is considered “mission-critical.”
Should FDA determine that a PAI is necessary for approval of an NDA or NDA supplement and such an
inspection cannot be completed during the review cycle due to restrictions on travel or other safety protocols, FDA has
stated that it generally intends to issue a complete response letter. Further, if there is inadequate information to make a
determination on the acceptability of a facility, FDA may defer action on the application until an inspection can be
completed. Such decisions will be based on the totality of the information available to the FDA, including considerations
of whether it can obtain existing inspection reports from trusted foreign regulatory partners through mutual recognition
and confidentiality agreements and/or secure additional records from the applicant, the manufacturing facility, or other
inspected entities. Accordingly, FDA has encouraged applicants to effectively communicate with all their facilities and
sites to ensure timely responses to any inquiries from FDA for information needed to support its assessment of pending
drug applications. FDA has also stated that it is using all available tools and sources of information to support regulatory
decisions on NDAs such as the historical compliance status of a manufacturing facility and other risk-benefit
considerations pertaining to the proposed new drug product and its manufacturing process and facilities. In addition,
whether or not FDA considers a facility inspection to be “mission-critical” involves several factors related to the public
health benefits of the proposed new drug product, including but not limited to whether the candidate has been granted
breakthrough therapy designation and whether the candidate is intended to treat or prevent a serious disease or medical
condition for which there is no other appropriate substitute. Regulatory authorities outside the United States, including
but not limited to the EMA, may adopt similar restrictions or other policy measures in response to the COVID-19
pandemic. We cannot guarantee that our NDA for odevixibat will be approved before or on its user fee goal date, or that
a necessary PAI inspection of one or both of our contract manufacturers for odevixibat will not have the potential to
delay FDA approval of our NDA or lead to the issuance of a complete response letter. We are actively monitoring
developments with respect to these matters, particularly because the contract manufacturers for odevixibat are located
outside the U.S., and an inspection of one or both facilities will be required before our NDA for odevixibat can be
approved.
The clinical trial designs, durations, endpoints and outcomes that will be required to obtain marketing approval
of odevixibat to treat PFIC patients are uncertain and, in any case, may vary among the FDA, EMA and other
regulatory authorities outside of the United States and Europe. Based on feedback that we have received from the
FDA and the EMA, we expect both regulatory authorities to place a greater emphasis on the totality of the data from
our Phase 3 clinical trial, including secondary endpoints, than may generally be expected. As a result, there is risk
that, even though the primary endpoints of our Phase 3 clinical trial of odevixibat for FDA evaluation purposes and
for EMA evaluation purposes were met with statistical significance, the applicable regulatory authority may not find
the overall results of our Phase 3 trial to be sufficient to support marketing approval of odevixibat to treat PFIC, a
symptom of PFIC such as pruritus or any other indication, and we may never receive marketing approval.
No product is currently approved for the treatment of PFIC in the United States, the European Union or, to our
knowledge, any other jurisdiction, and there is limited clinical experience in PFIC. Accordingly, there is not a well-
established development path that, with positive outcomes in clinical trials, would be reasonably assured of receiving
marketing approval for these indications.
51
Our Phase 3 PFIC program included a single randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, multicenter clinical
trial and an open label long-term extension study. In September 2020, we announced topline results from PEDFIC 1, our
Phase 3 clinical trial for odevixibat, given once per day as an oral capsule or sprinkled over food, in patients ages
6 months to 18 years with PFIC types 1 and 2, which was conducted at 33 global sites. Both doses of odevixibat tested
were statistically significant for each of the U.S. and E.U. primary endpoints. Odevixibat was well tolerated, with an
overall adverse event incidence similar to placebo. There were no drug-related serious adverse events, or SAEs, reported
during the study. In December 2020, we announced that we submitted an NDA to the FDA and an MAA to the EMA,
seeking approval of odevixibat for the treatment of patients with PFIC. In January 2021 we announced the FDA accepted
our NDA, with priority review and a user fee goal date under PDUFA of July 20, 2021.
Based on feedback that we have received from the FDA and the EMA, we expect both regulatory authorities to
place a greater emphasis on the totality of the data from our Phase 3 clinical trial, including secondary endpoints, than
may generally be expected. As a result, there is risk that, even though the primary endpoint of our Phase 3 clinical trial
of odevixibat for FDA evaluation purposes or for EMA evaluation purposes was met with statistical significance, the
applicable regulatory authority may not find the overall results of our Phase 3 trial to be sufficient to support marketing
approval of odevixibat to treat PFIC, a symptom of PFIC such as pruritus or any other indication, and we may never
receive marketing approval.
Furthermore, the FDA has informed us that showing a clinically meaningful effect only on pruritus could support
approval for the treatment of pruritus associated with PFIC and has indicated to us that meaningful improvements on one
or more additional clinical benefit endpoints and/or corroborative real-world clinical evidence would be required to
support approval for the treatment of PFIC itself. Certain secondary endpoints that we used in our Phase 3 trial may be
considered clinical benefit endpoints, including progression to surgery and change in growth markers.
For PEDFIC 1, serum bile acid responder rate was the primary endpoint for purposes of EMA evaluation and a
key secondary endpoint for FDA evaluation. To support the clinical utility of reduction in serum bile acids in the
treatment of patients with PFIC, we are supporting an independent study pooling and analyzing long-term PFIC patient
data from a number of leading PFIC academic centers, which we refer to as the PFIC Study Group. Should the data that
are being accumulated by the PFIC Study Group come to a different conclusion than we anticipate about the relationship
of serum bile acids to beneficial clinical outcomes, the EMA or the FDA may determine the results of the Phase 3 PFIC
study not to be adequate to support approval.
Also, it is possible that any marketing authorization we may receive from the EMA for odevixibat for the
treatment of PFIC could be conditional on post-authorization studies and not be considered a full authorization. Our
ability to obtain and maintain conditional marketing authorization in the European Union will be limited to specific
circumstances and subject to several conditions and obligations, if obtained at all, including the completion of a clinical
outcomes trial to confirm the clinical benefit of odevixibat in PFIC. Conditional marketing authorizations based on
incomplete clinical data may be granted for a limited number of listed medicinal products for human use, including
products designated as orphan medicinal products under European Union law, if (1) the risk-benefit balance of the
product is positive, (2) it is likely that the applicant will be in a position to provide the required comprehensive clinical
trial data, (3) unmet medical needs will be fulfilled and (4) the benefit to public health of the immediate availability on
the market of the medicinal product outweighs the risk inherent in the fact that additional data are still required. Specific
obligations, including with respect to the completion of ongoing or new studies, and with respect to the collection of
pharmacovigilance data, may be specified in the conditional marketing authorization. Conditional marketing
authorizations are valid for one year, and may be renewed annually, if the risk-benefit balance remains positive, and after
an assessment of the need for additional or modified conditions.
The FDA and EMA generally require two pivotal clinical trials to support marketing approval of a drug. In
December 2020, we announced that we submitted an NDA to the FDA and an MAA to the EMA, seeking approval of
odevixibat for the treatment of patients with PFIC. In January 2021 we announced the FDA accepted our NDA, with
priority review and a user fee goal date under PDUFA of July 20, 2021. Our single Phase 3 clinical trial in patients with
PFIC, together with data from a long-term, open label extension study, forms the primary support for our applications for
marketing approval of odevixibat in both the United States and European Union for treatment of patients with PFIC. If
the FDA or EMA requires us to conduct additional clinical trials beyond the ones that we currently contemplate in order
52
to support marketing approval of odevixibat to treat patients with PFIC in the United States or European Union, it would
result in a more expensive and potentially longer development program for odevixibat than we currently contemplate,
which could delay our ability to generate product revenues with odevixibat, interfere with our ability to enter into any
potential licensing or collaboration arrangements with respect to this program, cause our value to decline, and limit our
ability to obtain additional financing that may be necessary to complete additional trials. Even though a single Phase 3
trial of odevixibat serves as the basis, together with safety data from an extension study to evaluate long-term outcomes,
for an application for marketing approval for odevixibat in PFIC, either the FDA or the EMA may require that we meet
the primary endpoint or endpoints in the trial at a higher level of statistical significance than would otherwise be required
for a trial to be successful, which would reduce the likelihood of a positive trial.
The design of our Phase 3 clinical trial of odevixibat in patients with PFIC did not conform precisely in all
respects to the recommendations or preferences expressed by either the FDA or EMA.
Although the feedback on our Phase 3 clinical trial design in patients with PFIC that we had received from the
FDA and EMA is generally consistent, it was not identical and the design of our Phase 3 clinical trial of odevixibat in
patients with PFIC does not conform precisely in all respects to the recommendations or preferences expressed by either
regulatory authority. As a result, there is increased risk that, even though we view the results of our trial as favorable, the
FDA or EMA may not find the overall results to be sufficient to support marketing approval of odevixibat to treat PFIC,
a symptom of PFIC such as pruritus or any other indication.
Favorable results seen to date in clinical trials of odevixibat, including our Phase 3 trial of odevixibat in
patients with PFIC, may not be predictive of favorable results in our ongoing BOLD clinical trial of odevixibat in
biliary atresia or our ongoing ASSERT clinical trial of odevixibat in ALGS.
A number of companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in
later-stage clinical trials, even after promising results in earlier trials or in preclinical studies. Similarly, companies have
experienced disappointing outcomes in later phases of a multiphase clinical trial, even after promising results in an early
phase of the trial. Odevixibat has been evaluated in our Phase 3 trial in patients with PFIC, an open label Phase 2 trial in
children with chronic cholestasis and pruritus and in an investigator-initiated Phase 2 clinical trial for the treatment of
PBC. Our Phase 3 trial in PFIC met its two primary endpoints, demonstrating that odevixibat reduced serum bile acid
responses (sBAs) (p=0.003) and improved pruritus assessments (p=0.004) with a single digit diarrhea rate. Data from
our Phase 2 trial in children with chronic cholestasis and pruritus showed a reduction in serum bile acids in a substantial
majority of patients and improvement in pruritus that was significantly correlated with the reduction in serum bile acids.
In addition, based on data from the PBC trial that we received from the investigator, nine patients with pruritus received
odevixibat and all of them reported a reduction in pruritus. If the favorable findings on pruritus and serum bile acids seen
in our Phase 3 trial and these two Phase 2 trials are not replicated in any other future trial of odevixibat in patients with
PFIC or other pediatric cholestatic liver disease or disorder, we may not obtain marketing approval for odevixibat to treat
any indication, in which case our business would be materially and adversely affected.
Our Phase 3 trial of odevixibat in patients with PFIC involved a greater number of patients, different outcome
measures, doses and treatment duration and had other differences in trial design, in addition to the difference in patient
population, compared with either the prior pediatric chronic cholestasis trial or PBC trial. For example, our Phase 3 trial
of odevixibat was a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, multicenter, clinical trial designed to enroll
approximately 60 patients with PFIC (type 1 or 2), with a treatment duration of 24 weeks. The primary endpoint for
FDA evaluation, and a key secondary endpoint for EMA evaluation, will be an assessment of change in pruritus. The
primary endpoint for EMA evaluation, and a key secondary endpoint for FDA evaluation, will be serum bile acid
responder rate, where a responder is a patient who achieves either a reduction in serum bile acid levels of 70% or more
from baseline or a reduction of serum bile acid levels at least to an absolute level that is specified in between 50 and
100 µmol/l. Although we have assessed the effects of odevixibat on serum bile acids in prior clinical trials of odevixibat,
we have not previously utilized this serum bile acid responder rate endpoint. Moreover, we did not have any prior data
regarding the effect of a placebo in patients with PFIC on serum bile acid levels, pruritus or any other outcome variable
to guide the planning for our Phase 3 PFIC trial, which increased the risk that the trial would not be powered adequately
to show a statistically significant separation between odevixibat and placebo.
53
If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrollment of patients in our pivotal clinical trials of odevixibat in
patients with biliary atresia and Alagille syndrome, our receipt of marketing approval for odevixibat in those
indications could be delayed or prevented.
Recruiting patients for orphan pediatric liver diseases is challenging. We have previously experienced enrollment
delays in our clinical trials of odevixibat. If we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to
participate in clinical trials of our product candidates, we may not be able to initiate or continue the clinical trials. In
particular, if we experience enrollment delays in our pivotal trials of odevixibat in patients with biliary atresia and
Alagille syndrome, our cash resources may not be sufficient to enable us to fund the trial to completion, which could
cause our value to decline and limit our ability to obtain additional financing.
Potential clinical trial participants may not be adequately diagnosed or identified with the diseases that we are
targeting and may not meet the inclusion criteria for our trials. Biliary atresia, Alagille syndrome and other pediatric
cholestatic liver diseases or disorders for which we may develop odevixibat are rare diseases or disorders with a limited
patient populations, which could result in slow enrollment of clinical trial participants. Further, there are only a limited
number of specialist physicians that treat these diseases and disorders, and major clinical centers that treat these diseases
and disorders are concentrated in a few geographic regions.
Patient enrollment is affected by many factors, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
size of the target patient population;
severity of the disease or disorder under investigation;
eligibility criteria for the clinical trial in question;
other clinical trials being conducted at the same time involving patients who have the disease or disorder
under investigation;
perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under study;
approval and availability of other therapies to treat the disease or disorder that is being investigated in the
clinical trial;
willingness or unwillingness to participate in a placebo controlled clinical trial;
efforts to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;
patient referral practices of physicians;
the ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment; and
proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients.
Our inability to enroll a sufficient number of patients in our planned clinical trials of odevixibat, or any of our
other product candidates, would result in significant delays or may require us to abandon one or more clinical trials
altogether.
54
If the commercial opportunity in PFIC is smaller than we anticipate, or if odevixibat receives approval to treat
only a specific subpopulation of patients with PFIC or only a specific symptom of PFIC such as pruritus, our future
revenue from odevixibat may be adversely affected and our business may suffer.
If the size of the commercial opportunities in any of our target indications is smaller than we anticipate, we may
not be able to achieve profitability and growth. We are developing odevixibat initially as a treatment for patients with
PFIC and potentially also as a treatment for patients with other pediatric cholestatic liver diseases and disorders, such as
biliary atresia and ALGS. PFIC and these other diseases and disorders are each rare, with a limited patient population.
Moreover, we expect that the addressable PFIC patient population for odevixibat is only a subset of the overall patient
population, specifically patients who have not yet received partial external biliary diversion, or PEBD, surgery or liver
transplant surgery or patients who have had PEBD reversal surgery. We are not aware of any available patient registries
for PFIC, and we rely on various estimates and assumptions to estimate the addressable PFIC population. In addition,
there are different subtypes of PFIC and the beneficial effects of odevixibat may vary among patients with different
subtypes or among children of different ages. Our Phase 3 PEDFIC 1 clinical trial enrolled patients with PFIC,
type 1 or 2, but not PFIC, type 3. Based on FDA feedback, odevixibat may ultimately receive regulatory approval, if at
all, as a treatment for only the PFIC subtypes studied. It is also possible that odevixibat may ultimately receive
regulatory approval, if at all, as a treatment for children with PFIC of some ages but not others. Moreover, we are using
change in pruritus as the primary endpoint of our Phase 3 trial for purposes of FDA evaluation. The FDA has informed
us that showing a clinically meaningful effect only on pruritus could support approval for the treatment of pruritus
associated with PFIC and has indicated to us that meaningful improvements on one or more additional clinical benefit
endpoints and/or corroborative real-world clinical evidence would be required to support approval for the treatment of
PFIC itself. If the commercial opportunity in PFIC is smaller than we anticipate, whether because our estimates of the
addressable patient population prove to be incorrect, because odevixibat receives marketing approval, if at all, as a
treatment for some but not all PFIC subtypes, for children of some ages but not others, for pruritus associated with PFIC
but not PFIC itself or for any other reason, our future revenue from odevixibat may be adversely affected and our
business may suffer.
It is critical to our ability to grow and become profitable that we successfully identify patients with PFIC and any
other rare cholestatic liver diseases and disorders that we may target in the future. Our projections of the number of
people who have PFIC or our other potential target cholestatic liver diseases and disorders, as well as the subset who
have the potential to benefit from treatment with odevixibat, are based on a variety of sources, including third-party
estimates and analyses in the scientific literature, and may prove to be incorrect. Further, new information may emerge
that changes our estimate of the prevalence of these diseases or the number of patient candidates for odevixibat. The
effort to identify patients with PFIC or our other potential target indications is ongoing, and we cannot accurately predict
the number of patients for whom treatment might be possible. Additionally, the addressable patient population for
odevixibat may be limited or may not be amenable to treatment with odevixibat, and new patients may become
increasingly difficult to identify or gain access to, which would adversely affect our results of operations and our
business. Further, even if we obtain significant market share for odevixibat, we may never achieve profitability because
the potential target patient population for odevixibat is small.
If we experience any of a number of possible unforeseen events in connection with our clinical trials, potential
marketing approval or commercialization of our product candidates, or entry into licensing, collaboration or similar
arrangements, could be delayed or prevented.
We may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, clinical trials that could delay or prevent
our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize our product candidates, including:
•
•
clinical trials of our product candidates may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may decide, or
regulators may require us, to conduct additional clinical trials or abandon product development programs;
the number of patients required for clinical trials of our product candidates may be larger than we anticipate,
enrollment in these clinical trials may be slower than we anticipate or participants may drop out of these
clinical trials at a higher rate than we anticipate;
55
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
we may be unable to recruit and enroll a sufficient number of patients in our clinical trials to ensure adequate
statistical power to detect any statistically significant treatment effects;
our third-party contractors may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual
obligations to us in a timely manner, or at all;
regulators, institutional review boards or independent ethics committees may not authorize us or our
investigators to commence a clinical trial or conduct a clinical trial at a prospective trial site;
we may experience delays in reaching, or we may fail to reach, agreement on acceptable clinical trial
contracts or clinical trial protocols with prospective trial sites;
we may have to suspend or terminate clinical trials of our product candidates for various reasons, including a
finding that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks or undesirable side effects;
regulators, institutional review boards or independent ethics committees may require that we or our
investigators suspend or terminate clinical research for various reasons, including noncompliance with
regulatory requirements or a finding that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks;
the cost of clinical trials of our product candidates may be greater than we anticipate;
the supply or quality of our product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials of our
product candidates may be insufficient or inadequate; and
our product candidates may have undesirable side effects or other unexpected characteristics, causing us or
our investigators, regulators, institutional review boards or independent ethics committees to suspend or
terminate the clinical trials.
For example, in March 2015, Ferring International Center S.A., or Ferring, stopped early two Phase 3 clinical trials
of elobixibat that Ferring had been conducting pursuant to a now-terminated license agreement with us due to an issue
related to the distribution of study drug to study sites that was unrelated to the performance of elobixibat. We were
unable as a result of the stopping of the trials to obtain data for the total number of patients for which the trials were
designed, and the abbreviated trials are not sufficient to support an application for marketing approval.
Our product development costs will increase if we experience delays in testing or marketing approvals. We do not
know whether any preclinical studies or clinical trials will begin as planned, will need to be restructured or will be
completed on schedule, or at all. Significant preclinical study or clinical trial delays also could shorten any periods
during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to bring
products to market before we do and impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, which may
harm our business and results of operations.
The benefit of IBAT inhibition in the treatment of patients with PFIC or any of our other target indications is
unproven, and we do not know whether we will be able to develop any products of commercial value for these
indications.
Odevixibat is an ileal bile acid transporter, or IBAT, inhibitor. There is no marketed drug in the United States or
Europe that relies on IBAT inhibition for the treatment of PFIC or any other indication for which we plan to develop
odevixibat. Shire plc, or Shire, reported that, SHP625, now known as maralixibat, which it licensed to and is now being
developed by Mirum Pharmaceuticals, and has been reported to be an IBAT inhibitor, failed to meet the respective
primary endpoints of Phase 2 clinical trials in multiple adult and pediatric indications. We cannot assure you that we will
be able to replicate or improve upon our findings from preclinical studies and early clinical trials in later-stage clinical
trials of odevixibat for any of our other target indications or that our focus on IBAT inhibition as a medically useful
56
mechanism of action will result in the development of a commercially viable drug that safely and effectively treats PFIC
or any of our other target indications.
If serious or unacceptable side effects are identified during the development of odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or any
other product candidate, we may need to abandon or limit our development of that product candidate.
All of our product candidates are in clinical or preclinical development (other than elobixibat for chronic
constipation, which has been approved in Japan) and their risk of failure is high. It is impossible to predict when or if
any of our product candidates will prove effective or safe in humans or will receive marketing approval. If our product
candidates are associated with undesirable side effects or have other unexpected, unacceptable characteristics, we may
need to abandon their development or limit development to certain uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side
effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective. Many
investigational products that initially showed promise in clinical or earlier stage testing have later been found to cause
side effects or other safety issues that prevented further development.
For example, the investigator for the investigator-initiated Phase 2 clinical trial of odevixibat in PBC determined to
conclude the trial prior to its intended completion, citing gastrointestinal side effects. If the GI side effects cited by the
investigator in the PBC trial are predictive of an inadequate tolerability profile of odevixibat, the overall commercial
opportunity for odevixibat may be lower than we expect. Even if we receive regulatory approval for odevixibat, if the
approved dose of odevixibat is not well tolerated, odevixibat may not achieve market acceptance by physicians, patients,
third-party payors or others in the medical community, which would materially and adversely affect our business.
Even if odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or any potential future product candidate of ours receives marketing
approval, it may fail to achieve the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others
in the medical community necessary for commercial success.
If odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or any potential future product candidate of ours receives marketing approval, the
approved product may nonetheless fail to gain sufficient market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors
and others in the medical community. If an approved product does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may
not generate significant product revenues or any profits from operations. The degree of market acceptance of our product
candidates, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the efficacy and potential advantages compared to alternative treatments or competitive products;
the prevalence and severity of any side effects;
whether physicians will be willing to prescribe odevixibat to patients with PFIC notwithstanding that the
primary endpoint in our Phase 3 clinical trial of odevixibat in patients with PFIC is change in pruritus (FDA)
or serum bile acid responder rate (EMA), as opposed to a direct measure of reducing or eliminating
progressive liver disease;
the ability to offer our product candidates for sale at competitive prices;
convenience and ease of administration compared to alternative treatments;
the willingness of the target patient population to try and adhere to new therapies and of physicians to
prescribe these therapies;
the strength of marketing and distribution support;
the adequacy of supply of our product candidates;
the availability of third-party coverage and adequate reimbursement;
57
•
•
•
the timing of any such marketing approval in relation to other product approvals;
support from patient advocacy groups; and
any restrictions on concomitant use of other medications.
Our ability to negotiate, secure and maintain third-party coverage and reimbursement for our product candidates
may be affected by political, economic and regulatory developments in the United States, the European Union and other
jurisdictions. Governments continue to impose cost containment measures, and third-party payors are increasingly
challenging prices charged for medicines and examining their cost effectiveness, in addition to their safety and efficacy.
These and other similar developments could significantly limit the degree of market acceptance of odevixibat, A3907,
A2342 or any potential future product candidate of ours that receives marketing approval.
If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to
market and sell odevixibat or any of our other current or potential future product candidates, we may not be
successful in commercializing the applicable product candidate if it receives marketing approval.
We have limited experience as a company in the sale or marketing of pharmaceutical products. To achieve
commercial success for any approved product, we must either develop a sales and marketing organization or outsource
these functions to third parties. We are building the capabilities to commercialize odevixibat in the United States and
Europe in anticipation of marketing approval for odevixibat to treat PFIC in those jurisdictions. Outside of the United
States and Europe, we plan to selectively utilize collaboration, distribution or other marketing arrangements with third
parties to commercialize odevixibat. Also, we intend to selectively seek licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements
to assist us in furthering the development or commercialization of product candidates, such as A3907 or A2342,
targeting large primary care markets that must be served by large sales and marketing organizations. There are risks
involved with establishing our own sales and marketing capabilities and entering into arrangements with third parties to
perform these services. For example, recruiting and training a sales force is expensive and time consuming and could
delay any product launch. If the commercial launch of a PFIC or any other product candidate for which we recruit a sales
force and establish marketing capabilities is delayed or does not occur for any reason, we would have prematurely or
unnecessarily incurred these commercialization expenses. This may be costly, and our investment would be lost if we
cannot retain or reposition our sales and marketing personnel.
Factors that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize our products on our own include:
•
•
•
•
our inability to recruit, train and retain adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel;
the inability of sales personnel to obtain access to or persuade adequate numbers of physicians to prescribe
any future products;
the lack of complementary products to be offered by sales personnel, which may put us at a competitive
disadvantage relative to companies with more extensive product lines; and
unforeseen costs and expenses associated with creating an independent sales and marketing organization.
If we enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales and marketing services, our product revenues or
the profitability of these product revenues are likely to be lower than if we were to market and sell any products that we
develop ourselves. In addition, we may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to sell and
market our product candidates or may be unable to do so on terms that are acceptable to us. We likely will have little
control over such third parties, and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and
market our products effectively. If we do not establish sales and marketing capabilities successfully, either on our own or
in collaboration with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing our product candidates.
58
We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing
products to treat our target indications or markets before or more successfully than we do.
The development and commercialization of new drug products is highly competitive. We face competition with
respect to our current product candidates and any products we may seek to develop or commercialize in the future from
major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide.
Competitors may also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research
organizations that conduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research,
development, manufacturing and commercialization. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial
resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials,
obtaining approvals from regulatory authorities and marketing approved products than we do. Mergers and acquisitions
in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a
smaller number of our competitors. Smaller and other early-stage companies may also prove to be significant
competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties
compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites
and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies that may be complementary to or necessary
for our programs.
Our commercial opportunities could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize
products that are more effective, safer, have fewer or less severe side effects, are approved for broader indications or
patient populations, or are more convenient or less expensive than any products that we develop and commercialize. Our
competitors may also obtain marketing approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for our
products, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the
market.
In particular, we are aware of other companies that are developing product candidates that, like our product
candidates odevixibat and elobixibat, act via IBAT inhibition. As noted above, Mirum is conducting a Phase 3 clinical
trial of maralixibat in PFIC, for which it has reported that it expects to complete enrollment in the second quarter of 2021
and announce topline data by year-end 2021. As of February 2021, Mirum Pharmaceuticals announced the completion of
a rolling NDA submission for maralixibat in ALGS, and is planning for a potential launch in ALGS in the second half of
2021. We understand that Mirum’s MAA for maralixibat for the treatment of patients with PFIC type 2 has been
accepted for review by the EMA. If approved, our product candidates will compete for a share of the existing market
with numerous other products. We believe that the primary competitive products for use in indications that we are
currently targeting with our most advanced product candidates include the following.
•
•
For PFIC and many other cholestatic liver diseases, there are currently no approved drug treatments. First-
line treatment for PFIC is typically off-label ursodeoxycholic acid, or UDCA, which is approved in France
only for PFIC type 3, and in the United States and elsewhere for the treatment of PBC. PFIC patients often
require surgical intervention such as PEBD surgery or liver transplant. As noted above, Mirum has initiated
a Phase 3 clinical trial with maralixibat in PFIC, and plans to seek FDA approval for maralixibat as a
treatment for pruritus associated with ALGS. We understand that Mirum’s MAA for maralixibat for the
treatment of patients with PFIC type 2 has been accepted for review by the EMA. In addition, Intercept
Pharmaceuticals’ obeticholic acid, which is approved in the United States in combination with UDCA, or as
a monotherapy for patients unable to tolerate UDCA, to treat PBC, is in Phase 2 development as a treatment
for biliary atresia. GlaxoSmithKline’s linerixibat is at the Phase 2 development stage as a treatment for
pruritus associated with ALGS. In July 2019, Genfit SA received orphan designations from the FDA and
EMA elafibranor for the treatment of PBC. Genfit has announced plans to advance elafibranor into a Phase 3
program for PBC in 2020. Gilead Sciences, Inc.’s FXR agonist, cilofexor, has completed Phase 2
development for PBC, and is in Phase 3 development for PSC.
For the pruritus that is characteristic of many cholestatic liver diseases, symptomatic off-label treatment
with: UDCA; bile acid sequestrants, such as generic cholestyramine (marketed as, Efensol, Ipocol,
59
Kolestran, Lipocol, Olestyr, Prevalite or Quantalan in various countries), marketed by Upsher-Smith
Laboratories, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. and Sandoz, the generic pharmaceuticals division of
Novartis AG; rifampin, an antibiotic derivative; or naltrexone, an opioid antagonist.
For chronic constipation: linaclotide, a guanylate cyclase-C agonist, is marketed by Ironwood
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Allergan as Linzess in the United States and as Constella (for the treatment of a
related condition, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, or IBS-C) in Europe. Linaclotide is also
marketed by Astellas Pharma Inc. as Linzess in Japan for the treatment of IBS-C; lubiprostone, a type-2
chloride channel marketed as Amitiza by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited in the United States and
select countries in Europe and by Mylan N.V. in Japan; prucalopride, a motility agent marketed by Shire in
the United States as Motegrity and in the European Union as Resolor; and numerous over the counter
products, including psyllium husk (such as Metamucil), methylcellulose (such as Citrucel), calcium
polycarbophil (such as FiberCon), lactulose (such as Cephulac), polyethylene glycol (such as MiraLax),
sennosides (such as Exlax), bisacodyl (such as Ducolax), docusate sodium (such as Colace), magnesium
hydroxide (such as Milk of Magnesia), saline enemas (such as Fleet) and sorbitol.
Plecanatide, marketed as Trulance by Bausch Health Companies, Inc. is approved in the United States to
treat CIC and IBS-C. Ardelyx, Inc.’s product, IBSRELA (tenapanor) was approved by the FDA for the
treatment of IBS-C in September 2019.
•
•
Even if we are able to commercialize odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or any other product candidate that we develop,
the product may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, third-party reimbursement practices or
healthcare reform initiatives, which would harm our business.
The regulations that govern marketing approvals, pricing, coverage and reimbursement for new drug products vary
widely from country to country. Current and future legislation may significantly change the approval requirements in
ways that could involve additional costs and cause delays in obtaining approvals. Some countries require approval of the
sale price of a drug before it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins after marketing or
product licensing approval is granted and, in some markets, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains subject to
continuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. As a result, we might obtain marketing approval
for a product in a particular country, but then be subject to price regulations that delay our commercial launch of the
product, possibly for lengthy time periods, and negatively impact the revenues we are able to generate from the sale of
the product in that country. Adverse pricing limitations may hinder our ability to recoup our investment in one or more
product candidates, even if our product candidates obtain marketing approval.
Our ability to commercialize odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or any other product candidate successfully also will
depend in part on the extent to which coverage and adequate reimbursement for these products and related treatments
will be available from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations.
Government authorities and other third-party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance
organizations, decide which medications they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. A primary trend in the
U.S. and E.U. healthcare industries and elsewhere is cost containment. Government authorities and other third-party
payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications.
Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list
prices and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement
will be available for odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or any other product that we commercialize and, if coverage and
reimbursement is available, the level of reimbursement. Reimbursement may impact the demand for, or the price of, any
product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval. Obtaining and maintaining adequate reimbursement for
odevixibat may be particularly difficult because of the higher prices typically associated with drugs directed at smaller
populations of patients. In addition, third-party payors are likely to impose strict requirements for reimbursement of a
higher priced drug, and any launch of a competitive product is likely to create downward pressure on the price initially
charged. If reimbursement is not available or is available only to a limited degree, we may not be able to successfully
commercialize any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval.
60
There may be significant delays in obtaining coverage and reimbursement for newly approved drugs, and coverage
may be more limited than the purposes for which the drug is approved by the applicable regulatory authority. Moreover,
eligibility for coverage and reimbursement does not imply that any drug will be paid for in all cases or at a rate that
covers our costs, including research, development, intellectual property, manufacturing, sale and distribution expenses.
Interim reimbursement levels for new drugs, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may not be
made permanent. Reimbursement rates may vary according to the use of the drug and the clinical setting in which it is
used, may be based on reimbursement levels already set for lower cost drugs, and may be incorporated into existing
payments for other services. Net prices for drugs may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by
government healthcare programs or private payors and by any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of
drugs from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the United States. In the United States, third-party
payors often rely upon Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement policies. In
the European Union, reference pricing systems and other measures may lead to cost containment and reduced prices. Our
inability to promptly obtain coverage and adequate reimbursement rates from both government-funded and private
payors for any approved products that we develop could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, our
ability to raise capital needed to commercialize products and our overall financial condition.
Governments outside the United States tend to impose strict price controls, which may adversely affect our
revenues, if any.
In some countries, particularly the member states of the European Union, the pricing of prescription
pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental
authorities can take considerable time after the receipt of marketing approval for a product. In addition, there can be
considerable pressure by governments and other stakeholders on prices and reimbursement levels, including as part of
cost containment measures. Political, economic and regulatory developments may further complicate pricing
negotiations, and pricing negotiations may continue after reimbursement has been obtained. Reference pricing used by
various E.U. member states and parallel distribution, or arbitrage between low-priced and high-priced member states,
can further reduce prices. In some countries, we may be required to conduct a clinical trial or other studies that compare
the cost-effectiveness of our product candidate to other available therapies in order to obtain or maintain reimbursement
or pricing approval. Publication of discounts by third-party payors or authorities may lead to further pressure on prices or
reimbursement levels within the country of publication and other countries. If reimbursement of our products is
unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, our business could be adversely
affected.
Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and to limit
commercialization of any products that we may develop.
We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our product candidates in human
clinical trials and will face an even greater risk with respect to commercial sales of any products that we may develop. If
we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that our product candidates or products caused injuries, we will
incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:
•
•
•
•
•
•
reduced resources of our management to pursue our business strategy;
decreased demand for any products that we may develop;
injury to our reputation and significant negative media attention;
withdrawal of clinical trial participants or sites;
significant costs to defend the related litigation;
substantial monetary awards to clinical trial participants or patients;
61
•
•
•
loss of revenue;
increased insurance costs; and
the inability to commercialize any products that we may develop.
We have separate liability insurance policies that cover each of our clinical trials, as well as a global
product/clinical trial policy. These policies provide coverage in varying amounts, with the global policy having a per
occurrence and aggregate limit of $10 million. The amount of insurance that we currently hold may not be adequate to
cover all liabilities that we may incur. We will need to increase our insurance coverage when and if we begin conducting
more expansive clinical development of, or commercializing, odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or any potential future product
candidate of ours. Insurance coverage is increasingly expensive. We may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a
reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise.
We may expend our limited resources to pursue a particular product candidate and fail to capitalize on product
candidates that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.
Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we focus on specific product candidates. Currently,
we are focusing our resources predominantly on odevixibat. As a result, we may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities
with potential future product candidates that later could prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource
allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities.
Our spending on current and future research and development programs and product candidates may not yield any
commercially viable products.
We have historically based our research and development efforts on IBAT inhibitors, including odevixibat and
elobixibat, to treat cholestatic liver diseases and CIC and on our proprietary formulations of, A3907 and A2342, as
potential treatments for adult liver or viral diseases. Notwithstanding our investment to date and anticipated future
investment, we have not yet developed, and may never successfully develop, any marketed drugs using these
approaches. As a result of pursuing the development of product candidates using our proprietary technologies, we may
fail to develop product candidates or address indications based on other scientific approaches that may offer greater
commercial potential or for which there is a greater likelihood of success. Research programs to identify new product
candidates require substantial technical, financial and human resources. These programs may initially show promise in
identifying potential product candidates, yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development.
If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we
may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through licensing, collaboration or other royalty or similar
arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and
commercialization rights to such product candidate.
If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we
may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through licensing, collaboration or other royalty or similar
arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and
commercialization rights to such product candidate.
Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties
We rely on EA Pharma for the successful commercialization of elobixibat to treat chronic constipation in
Japan and for the successful development and commercialization of elobixibat to treat chronic constipation in other
select markets in Asia. If EA Pharma does not successfully commercialize elobixibat in Japan, we may not receive
any future payments under our license agreement with EA Pharma.
We entered into a license agreement with EA Pharma (formerly known as Ajinomoto Pharmaceuticals) for
elobixibat in April 2012. In January 2018, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, or MHLW, approved a
62
new drug application filed by EA Pharma for elobixibat for the treatment of chronic constipation. EA Pharma co-
markets elobixibat in Japan with another company, Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, or Mochida, and co-promotes
elobixibat in Japan with Eisai Co., Ltd.
In December 2017, the Company entered into a royalty interest acquisition agreement (RIAA) with HealthCare
Royalty Partners III, L.P. (HCR) pursuant to which it sold to HCR the right to receive all royalties from sales in Japan
and sales milestones achieved from any covered territory potentially payable to the Company under the Agreement, up
to a specified maximum “cap” amount of $78.8 million, based on the funds the Company received from HCR to date.
The Company received $44.5 million from HCR, net of certain transaction expenses, under the RIAA. On June 8, 2020,
we entered into an amendment to the RIAA with HCR pursuant to which HCR agreed to pay us an additional $14.8
million, net of certain transactions expenses, in exchange for the elimination of the (i) $78.8 million cap amount on
HCR’s rights to receive royalties on sales in Japan and sales milestones for elobixibat in certain other territories that may
become payable by EA Pharma and (ii) $15.0 million payable to us if a specified sales milestone is achieved for
elobixibat in Japan. The Company is obligated to make royalty interest payments to HCR under the RIAA only to the
extent it receives future Japanese royalties, sales milestones or other specified payments from EA Pharma. Although the
Company sold its rights to receive royalties from the sales of elobixibat in Japan, as a result of its ongoing involvement
in the cash flows related to these royalties, the Company will continue to account for these royalties as revenue. Upon
receipt of the payments from HCR the Company recorded the $59.3 million as a liability related to sale of future
royalties (royalty obligation). The royalty obligation will be accreted using the effective interest rate method.
The Company records estimated royalties due for the current period in accrued other expenses until the payment is
received from EA Pharma at which time the Company then remits payment to HCR. In order to determine the accretion
of the royalty obligation, the Company is required to estimate the total amount of future royalty payments to be received
and submitted to HCR. The sum of these amounts less the $59.3 million proceeds the Company received will be
recorded as interest expense over the life of the royalty obligation. At December 31, 2020, the Company’s estimate of its
total interest expense resulted in an annual effective interest rate of approximately 19.0%.
The Company periodically assesses the estimated royalty payments to HCR and to the extent such payments are
greater or less than its initial estimates or the timing of such payments is materially different than its original estimates,
the Company will prospectively adjust the accretion of interest on the royalty obligation. There are a number of factors
that could materially affect the amount and the timing of royalty payments, most of which are not within the Company’s
control. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the rate of elobixibat prescriptions, the number of doses
administered, the introduction of competing products, manufacturing or other delays, patent protection, adverse events
that result in governmental health authority imposed restrictions on the use of the drug products, significant changes in
foreign exchange rates as the royalties remitted to HCR are in U.S. dollars while sales of elobixibat are in Japanese yen,
and sales never achieving forecasted numbers, which would result in reduced royalty payments and reduced non-cash
interest expense over the life of the royalty obligation. To the extent future royalties result in an amount less than the
liability, the Company is not obligated to fund any such shortfall.
EA Pharma is responsible for all commercialization of elobixibat in its licensed field (namely, all prophylactic or
therapeutic uses of a pharmaceutical product for gastrointestinal diseases and disorders, symptoms of constipation of all
causes or postoperative ileus, in colonoscopy cleansing procedures and, in specified circumstances, select liver diseases)
in Japan and for all future development and commercialization of elobixibat in its licensed field, and has substantial
control over the conduct and timing of development efforts with respect to elobixibat in these countries. We have little
control over the amount and timing of resources that EA Pharma devotes, or Mochida devotes, to the commercialization
of elobixibat in Japan or to the development of elobixibat in these other countries. If EA Pharma or, where applicable,
Mochida fails to devote sufficient financial and other resources, the commercialization of elobixibat in Japan and the
development and potential commercialization of elobixibat otherwise in EA Pharma’s licensed territory would be
adversely affected. If this occurs, royalties that we could receive on any future elobixibat product sales could be delayed
or reduced.
EA Pharma has the right to terminate the elobixibat agreement on a country-by-country basis or in its entirety for
an uncured material breach by us or in specified bankruptcy or similar events. EA Pharma also has the right, with
63
180 days’ notice, to terminate the agreement in its entirety or on a country-by-country basis (except for Japan) for any
reason.
If EA Pharma terminates the elobixibat license agreement at any time, for any reason, it would negatively impact
both the likelihood that we would receive any future payments under our license agreement with EA Pharma and the
development of elobixibat in EA Pharma’s licensed territory outside of Japan, would materially harm our business and
could accelerate our need for additional capital. In particular, we would be required to seek a replacement licensee for
Japan under the RIAA.
If we do not pursue the development and potential commercialization of elobixibat for the treatment of CIC in
the United States or Europe, whether through a licensing, collaboration or similar arrangement or otherwise, the
revenue that we will generate based on elobixibat may be lower.
We have commercial rights to elobixibat in the United States, Europe and otherwise outside of the territories
licensed to EA Pharma. We do not have any current plan to seek a license or other partnering transaction with a third
party for elobixibat for CIC in the United States or Europe. The cost and duration of the additional clinical trial or trials
that would be required by the FDA and EMA to support marketing approval of elobixibat to treat CIC is currently
uncertain. Even if we were to seek to establish licensing, collaboration or similar arrangement with a third party for the
United States or Europe, the uncertain regulatory requirements may interfere with our ability to do so on acceptable
terms, or at all. We do not anticipate that we will conduct future clinical trials of elobixibat in CIC for the United States
or Europe independently, whether or not we elect to seek a suitable third-party arrangement. If we do not enter into
suitable third-party arrangements and do not ourselves conduct clinical trials of elobixibat in CIC for the United States or
Europe, the revenue that we will generate based on elobixibat in CIC will be limited to future payments that we receive,
if any, under our agreements with EA Pharma, which will reduce the overall commercial potential of elobixibat and may
harm our business.
We rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily,
including failing to meet deadlines for the completion of such clinical trials.
We do not independently conduct clinical trials for our product candidates. We rely on third parties, such as
contract research organizations, clinical data management organizations, medical institutions, clinical investigators and
government agencies, to perform this function. Any of these third parties may terminate their engagements with us at
any time. If we need to enter into alternative arrangements, it would delay our product development activities.
Our reliance on these third parties for clinical development activities reduces our control over these activities but
does not relieve us of our responsibilities. For example, we remain responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials
is conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the clinical trial. Moreover, the FDA
and foreign regulatory authorities require us to comply with standards, commonly referred to as Good Clinical Practice,
or GCP, for conducting, recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are
credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity of data and confidentiality of clinical trial participants are protected.
We are also required to register clinical trials subject to FDA regulation and, with some exceptions, post the results of
completed clinical trials on a government-sponsored database, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, within certain timeframes.
Failure to do so can result in fines, adverse publicity and civil and criminal sanctions. The National Institutes of Health
also has announced plans to require sponsors to post results of clinical trials for unapproved products, including
unfavorable results in clinical trials for unapproved uses of approved products.
Furthermore, third parties that we rely on for our clinical development activities may also have relationships with
other entities, some of which may be our competitors. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual
duties, meet expected deadlines or conduct our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated
protocols, we will not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, marketing approvals for our product candidates
and will not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize our product candidates. Our
product development costs will increase if we experience delays in testing or obtaining marketing approvals.
64
We also rely on other third parties to store and distribute drug supplies for our clinical trials. Any performance
failure on the part of our distributors could delay clinical development or marketing approval of our product candidates
or commercialization of our products, producing additional losses and depriving us of potential product revenue.
Use of third parties to manufacture our product candidates may increase the risk that we will not have
sufficient quantities of our product candidates or products or such quantities at an acceptable cost, which could
delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts.
We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production of clinical or commercial supplies of our
product candidates. We have limited personnel with experience in drug manufacturing and lack the resources and the
capabilities to manufacture any of our product candidates on a clinical or commercial scale. We currently rely on third
parties for supply of the active pharmaceutical ingredients, or API, in our product candidates. Our strategy is to
outsource all manufacturing of our product candidates and any approved products to third parties.
We do not currently have any agreements with third-party manufacturers for the long-term clinical or commercial
supply of any of our product candidates. We currently engage a single third-party manufacturer to provide API for
odevixibat and elobixibat. We also currently engage single third-party manufacturers to provide fill and finish services
for the final drug product formulation of our product candidate in development. We may in the future be unable to enter
into agreements for commercial supply with third-party manufacturers on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, while
we believe that there are alternative sources available to manufacture our product candidates, in the event that we seek
such alternative sources, we may not be able to enter into replacement arrangements without delays or additional
expenditures. We cannot estimate these delays or costs with certainty but, if they were to occur, they could cause a delay
in our development and commercialization efforts. If our third party manufacturing agreements are terminated or if the
sources of supply from such arrangements are inadequate and we must seek supply agreements from alternative sources,
we may be unable to enter into such agreements or do so on commercially reasonable terms, which could delay a product
launch or subject our commercialization efforts to significant supply risk.
Even if we are able to establish and maintain arrangements with third-party manufacturers, reliance on third-party
manufacturers entails additional risks, including:
•
•
•
•
reliance on the third party for regulatory compliance and quality assurance;
the possible breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party;
the possible misappropriation of our proprietary information, including our trade secrets and know-how; and
the possible termination or nonrenewal of the agreement by the third party at a time that is costly or
inconvenient for us.
Manufacturers of our product candidates are obliged to operate in accordance with FDA-mandated current good
manufacturing practices, or cGMP’s. The manufacture of pharmaceutical products in compliance with cGMPs requires
significant expertise and capital investment, including the development of advanced manufacturing techniques and
process controls. Manufacturers of pharmaceutical products often encounter difficulties in production, including
difficulties with volume production, production costs and yields, laboratory testing, quality control, including stability of
the product or product candidate, or quality assurance testing, or suffer shortages of qualified personnel, as well as
compliance with strictly enforced cGMP requirements, other federal and state regulatory requirements and foreign
regulations, any of which could result in our inability to manufacture sufficient quantities to meet clinical timelines for a
particular product candidate, to obtain marketing approval for the product candidate or to commercialize the product
candidate. If our manufacturers were to encounter any of these difficulties or otherwise fail to comply with their
obligations to us or under applicable regulations, our ability to provide product for commercial sale or product
candidates in our clinical trials would be jeopardized.
In addition, the facilities used by our contract manufacturers or other third party manufacturers to manufacture our
product candidates must be approved by the FDA pursuant to inspections conducted following our request for regulatory
approval for our product candidates from the FDA. These requirements include, among other things, quality control,
quality assurance and the maintenance of records and documentation. Manufacturers of our product candidates may be
unable to comply with these cGMP requirements and with other FDA, state and foreign regulatory requirements. The
65
FDA or similar foreign regulatory agencies may also implement new standards at any time, or change their interpretation
and enforcement of existing standards for manufacture, packaging or testing of products. We have little control over our
manufacturers' compliance with these regulations and standards. A failure of any of our current or future contract
manufacturers to establish and follow cGMPs and to document their adherence to such practices may lead to significant
delays in clinical trials or in obtaining regulatory approval of product candidates or the ultimate launch of products, if
approved, into the market. Failure by our current or future third-party manufacturers or us to comply with applicable
regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, failure of the
government to grant pre-market approval of drugs, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, seizures or recalls of
products, operating restrictions, and criminal prosecutions. If the safety of any product supplied is compromised due to
our manufacturers' failure to adhere to applicable laws or for other reasons, we may not be able to obtain regulatory
approval for or successfully commercialize our products and we may be held liable for any injuries sustained as a result.
Any of these factors could cause a delay of clinical studies, regulatory submissions, approvals or commercialization of
our product candidates or approved products, entail higher costs or impair our reputation.
Our product candidates and any products that we may develop may compete with other product candidates and
products for access to manufacturing facilities. There are a limited number of manufacturers that operate under cGMP
regulations and that might be capable of manufacturing for us.
If the third parties that we engage to manufacture product for our preclinical tests and clinical trials cease to
continue to do so for any reason, we likely would experience delays in advancing these clinical trials while we identify
and qualify replacement suppliers and we may be unable to obtain replacement supplies on terms that are favorable to
us. In addition, if we are not able to obtain adequate supplies of our product candidates or the drug substances used to
manufacture them, it will be more difficult for us to develop our product candidates and compete effectively.
Furthermore, any delay or interruption in the supply of commercial quantities of approved product could have a material
adverse impact on our revenue from product sales and any delay or interruption in the supply of clinical trial materials
could delay the completion of our clinical trials, increase the costs associated with maintaining our clinical development
programs and, depending upon the period of delay, require us to commence new clinical trials or redo work that has
already been done, in either case at significant additional expense to us, or to terminate the clinical trials completely.
Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacture of our product candidates may
adversely affect our future profit margins and our ability to develop product candidates and commercialize any products
that receive marketing approval on a timely and competitive basis.
We may depend on additional collaborations, licenses or similar arrangements with third parties for the
development and commercialization of some of our product candidates. If those collaborations are not successful, we
may not be able to capitalize on the market potential of these product candidates.
We have licensed rights to develop and commercialize elobixibat for CIC and other gastrointestinal diseases and
disorders to EA Pharma in Japan and other select markets in Asia. We may in the future enter into other licensing,
collaboration or similar arrangements for the development and commercialization of odevixibat, elobixibat, A3907,
A2342 or any potential future product candidate of ours for any or all indications and for any or all territories, except for
the rights currently subject to EA Pharma’s license with respect to elobixibat.
Our likely counterparties for any licensing, collaboration or similar arrangement include large and mid-size
pharmaceutical companies, regional and national pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies. Except for
our agreement with EA Pharma, we are not currently party to any such arrangement for odevixibat, elobixibat A3907 or
A2342. However, if we do enter into any such arrangements with any third parties in the future, we will likely have
limited control over the amount and timing of resources that our collaborators dedicate to the development or
commercialization of the applicable product candidate. Our ability to generate revenues from these arrangements will
depend on our collaborators’ abilities and efforts to successfully perform the functions assigned to them in these
arrangements.
66
Any licensing, collaboration or similar arrangement involving our product candidates would pose numerous risks
to us, including the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
collaborators have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these
collaborations and may not perform their obligations as expected;
collaborators may deemphasize or not pursue development and commercialization of our product candidates
or may elect not to continue or renew development or commercialization programs based on clinical trial
results, changes in the collaborators’ strategic focus, including as a result of a sale or disposition of a
business unit or development function, or available funding, or external factors such as an acquisition that
diverts resources or creates competing priorities;
collaborators may delay clinical trials, provide insufficient funding for a clinical trial program, stop a clinical
trial or abandon a product candidate, repeat or conduct new clinical trials or require a new formulation of a
product candidate for clinical testing;
collaborators may independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that compete directly or
indirectly with our products or product candidates if the collaborators believe that competitive products are
more likely to be successfully developed or can be commercialized under terms that are more economically
attractive than ours;
a collaborator with marketing and distribution rights to multiple products may not commit sufficient
resources to the marketing and distribution of our product relative to other products;
collaborators may not properly maintain or defend our intellectual property rights or may use our proprietary
information in such a way as to invite litigation that could jeopardize or invalidate our intellectual property
or proprietary information or expose us to potential litigation;
collaborators may infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties, which may expose us to litigation
and potential liability;
disputes may arise between us and a collaborator as to the ownership of intellectual property arising during
the collaboration;
we may grant exclusive rights to our collaborators, which would prevent us from collaborating with others
or make us a less attractive collaboration partner by narrowing the scope of potential collaborations into
which we may enter;
disputes may arise between us and a collaborator that result in the delay or termination of the research,
development or commercialization of our products or product candidates or that result in costly litigation or
arbitration that diverts management attention and resources; and
collaborations may be terminated and, if terminated, may result in a need to identify and enter into a new
licensing, collaboration or similar arrangement or obtain additional capital to pursue further development or
commercialization of the applicable product candidates.
Collaboration agreements may not lead to development or commercialization of product candidates in the most
efficient manner or at all. If a collaborator of ours were to be involved in a business combination, the continued pursuit
and emphasis on our product development or commercialization program could be delayed, diminished or terminated.
67
If we are not able to establish additional collaborations, we may have to alter our development and
commercialization plans.
Our product development programs and the potential commercialization of our product candidates will require
substantial additional cash to fund expenses. For some of our product candidates, we may decide to collaborate with
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for the development and potential commercialization of those product
candidates.
We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for
a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator’s resources and expertise, the
terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator’s evaluation of a number of factors.
Those factors may include the design or results of clinical trials, the likelihood of approval by regulatory authorities, the
potential market for the subject product candidate, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering such
product candidate to patients, the potential of competing products, the existence of uncertainty with respect to our
ownership of technology, which can exist if there is a challenge to such ownership without regard to the merits of the
challenge, and industry and market conditions generally. The collaborator may also consider alternative product
candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and whether such a
collaboration could be more attractive than the one with us for our product candidate. We may also be restricted under
future license agreements from entering into agreements on certain terms with potential collaborators. Collaborations are
complex and time-consuming to negotiate and document. In addition, there have been a significant number of business
combinations among large pharmaceutical companies that have resulted in a reduced number of potential future
collaborators.
We may not be able to negotiate collaborations on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to
do so, we may have to curtail the development of a product candidate, reduce or delay our development program or one
or more of our other development programs, delay our potential commercialization or reduce the scope of any sales or
marketing activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at our own
expense. If we do not have sufficient funds, we may not be able to further develop our product candidates or bring them
to market and generate product revenue.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for our technology and products, or if the scope of
the patent protection is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize technology and
products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our technology and products may
be adversely affected.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in the United States and
other countries with respect to our proprietary technology and products. We seek to protect our proprietary position by
filing patent applications in the United States, in Europe and in certain additional jurisdictions related to our novel
technologies and product candidates that are important to our business. This process is expensive and time-consuming,
and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a
timely manner. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development output
before it is too late to obtain patent protection. Moreover, if we license technology or product candidates from third
parties in the future, these license agreements may not permit us to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of
patent applications, or to maintain or enforce the patents, covering the licensed technology or product candidates. These
agreements could also give our licensors the right to enforce the licensed patents without our involvement, or to decide
not to enforce the patents at all. Therefore, in these circumstances, these patents and applications may not be prosecuted
or enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business.
The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves
complex legal and factual questions and has in recent years been the subject of much litigation. As a result, the issuance,
scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain. Our pending and future
68
patent applications may not result in patents being issued which protect our technology or products, in whole or in part,
or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products. Changes in either the
patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our
patents, narrow the scope of our patent protection or make enforcement more difficult or uncertain.
The laws of other countries may not protect our patent rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.
Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the
United States, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the United States or other
jurisdictions. Many companies have encountered significant difficulties in protecting and defending intellectual property
rights in such foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, including certain developing countries, do not
favor the enforcement of patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to
biotechnology, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patent rights or the marketing of
competing products in violation of our intellectual property and proprietary rights generally. For example, European
patent law restricts the patentability of methods of treatment of the human body more than U.S. law does. For this or
other reasons, we may not pursue or obtain patent protection in all major markets or may not obtain protection that
enables us to prevent the entry of third parties onto the market.
Additionally, proceedings to enforce our intellectual property and proprietary rights in foreign jurisdictions could
result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at
risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly, could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing and could
provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the damages or
other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our
intellectual property and proprietary rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial
advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.
Further, many countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant
licenses to third parties. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or
government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially
diminish the value of such patent. If we are forced to grant a license to third parties with respect to any patents relevant
to our business, our competitive position may be impaired, and our business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects may be adversely affected.
Assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, currently, the first to file a patent application is
generally entitled to the patent. However, prior to March 16, 2013, in the United States, the first to invent was entitled to
the patent. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent
applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, or in
some cases not at all. Therefore, we cannot know with certainty whether we were the first to make the inventions
claimed in our U.S. patents or pending U.S. patent applications filed prior to March 16, 2013.
Moreover, we may be subject to a third party preissuance submission of prior art to the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, or the USPTO, or become involved in opposition, derivation, reexamination, reissue, inter partes review, post
grant review, interference proceedings or other patent office proceedings, court litigation or International Trade
Commission proceedings, in the United States or elsewhere, challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others.
An adverse determination in any such submission, proceeding or litigation concerning our patent rights could reduce the
scope of or prevent the enforceability of, or invalidate, our patent rights, allowing third parties to commercialize our
technology or products, or equivalent or similar technology or products, and so to compete directly with us, without
payment to us, or, where such proceedings involve third-party patents, result in our inability to manufacture or
commercialize products without infringing third-party patent rights. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection
provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened or narrowed by operation of any of the foregoing, such an
event could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or potential
future product candidates of ours.
69
Even if our patent applications issue as patents, they may not issue in a form that will provide us with adequate
protection to prevent competitors from competing with us or otherwise to provide us with any competitive advantage.
Our competitors may be able to circumvent our owned or licensed patents by developing similar, improved or alternative
technologies or products in a noninfringing manner. Moreover, method-of-treatment patent claims are more difficult to
enforce than composition-of-matter claims for reasons including off-label sale, potential divided infringement issues and
use of the subject compound in noninfringing manners. Physicians are permitted to prescribe an approved product for
uses that are not described in the product’s labeling. Although off-label prescriptions may infringe our method-of-
treatment patents, the practice is common across medical specialties and such infringement is difficult to prevent or
prosecute. Off-label sales would limit our ability to generate revenue from the sale of our product candidates, if
approved for commercial sale. In addition, if a third party were able to design around our dosage-form and formulation
patents and create a different formulation and dosage form that is not covered by our patents or patent applications, we
would likely be unable to prevent that third party from manufacturing and marketing our product.
In addition, other companies may attempt to circumvent any regulatory data protection or market exclusivity that
we obtain under applicable legislation, such as orphan drug exclusivity in the United States, which may require us to
allocate significant resources to preventing such circumvention. Legal and regulatory developments in the European
Union and elsewhere may also result in clinical trial data submitted as part of a marketing authorization application
becoming publicly available. Such developments could enable other companies to use our clinical trial data to assist in
their own product development and to obtain marketing authorizations in the European Union and in other jurisdictions.
Such developments may also require us to allocate significant resources to prevent other companies from circumventing
or violating our intellectual property rights. Our attempts to prevent third parties from circumventing our intellectual
property and other rights may ultimately be unsuccessful. We may also fail to take the required actions or pay the
necessary fees to maintain our patents.
The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, and our owned
and licensed patents may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the United States, Europe and elsewhere. Such
challenges may result in loss of exclusivity or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable, in
whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical
technology and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products. Future changes in
U.S. statutory or case law beyond our control could affect some or all of the foregoing possibilities. Given the amount of
time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such
candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. This could be the case even after
giving effect to patent term extensions and data exclusivity provisions preventing third parties from relying on clinical
trial data filed by us for marketing approval in support of their own applications for such approval. As a result, our patent
portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical
to ours.
We may become involved in lawsuits or other enforcement proceedings to protect or enforce our patents or
other intellectual property, which could be expensive, time consuming and potentially unsuccessful.
Competitors may infringe our patents, trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual property. To counter
infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file claims, which can be expensive and time consuming. Any
claims we assert against perceived infringers could provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us alleging that
we infringe their intellectual property or that our patent and other intellectual property rights are invalid or
unenforceable, including for antitrust reasons. As a result, in a patent infringement proceeding, a court or administrative
body may decide that a patent of ours is invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, or may construe the patent’s
claims narrowly and so refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents
do not cover the competitor technology in question. Even if we are successful in a patent infringement action, the
unsuccessful party may subsequently raise antitrust issues and bring a follow-on action. Antitrust issues may also
provide a bar to settlement or constrain the permissible settlement terms. Further, settlement agreements in the
pharmaceutical sector are the subject of ongoing review by the antitrust authorities in the European Union.
70
Third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are infringing their intellectual property rights, the
outcome of which would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.
Our commercial success depends upon our ability and the ability of our current or potential future licensees or
collaborators to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates and use our proprietary technologies
without infringing the intellectual property and other proprietary rights of third parties. There is considerable intellectual
property litigation in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, and we may become party to, or threatened with,
future adversarial proceedings or litigation regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our products and
technology, including interference, derivation, inter partes review, reexamination, reissue or post-grant review
proceedings before the USPTO. The risks of being involved in such litigation and office proceedings may also increase
as our product candidates approach commercialization, and as our business gains greater visibility operating as a
publicly traded company in the United States. Third parties may assert infringement claims against us based on existing
or future intellectual property rights and so restrict our freedom to operate. Third parties may also seek injunctive relief
against us, whereby they would attempt to prevent us from practicing our technologies altogether pending the outcome
of any litigation against us. We may not be aware of all such intellectual property rights potentially relating to our
product candidates prior to their assertion against us. For example, we have not conducted an in depth freedom-to-
operate search or analysis for odevixibat. Any freedom-to-operate search or analysis previously conducted may not have
uncovered all relevant patents and pending patent applications, and there may be pending or future patent applications
that, if issued, would block us from commercializing odevixibat or any other product candidate. Thus, we do not know
with certainty whether odevixibat or any other product candidate, or our commercialization of any such product
candidate, does not and will not infringe any third party’s intellectual property.
If we are found to infringe a third party’s intellectual property rights, or in order to avoid or settle litigation, we
could be required to obtain a license to enable us to continue developing and marketing our products and technology.
However, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Even if we
were able to obtain a license, it could be nonexclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies
that we have then licensed, and could require us to make substantial payments. Absent a license, we could be forced,
including by court order, to cease commercializing the infringing technology or product. In addition, we could be found
liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to have willfully infringed a
patent or other intellectual property right. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing our product
candidates or force us to cease some of our business operations, which could materially harm our business. Claims that
we have misappropriated the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties, or claims that we derived
inventions from another, could have a similar negative impact on our business.
We may be subject to claims by third parties asserting that we or our employees have misappropriated their
intellectual property, or claiming ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual property.
Many of our employees were previously employed at universities or other biotechnology or pharmaceutical
companies. Although we try to ensure that our employees do not use the proprietary or otherwise confidential
information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or these employees have
without authorization used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary or confidential
information, of any such employee’s former employer. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims.
In addition, while we typically require our employees and contractors who may be involved in the development of
intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to us and agreeing to cooperate and assist
us with securing and defending our intellectual property, we may be unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with
each party who in fact develops intellectual property that we regard as our own. These assignment agreements may not
be self-executing or may be breached, and we may be forced to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims they
may bring against us, to determine the ownership of what we regard as our intellectual property.
If we fail in prosecuting or defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose
valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. Even if we are successful in prosecuting or defending against such
claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management.
71
Intellectual property litigation could cause us to spend substantial resources and could distract our personnel
from their normal responsibilities.
Even if resolved in our favor, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims may
cause us to incur significant expenses and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal
responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim
proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a
substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase
our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development, sales, marketing or distribution activities. We
may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings. Some of our
competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of
their greater financial resources. Accordingly, costs and lost management time, as well as uncertainties resulting from
the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings, could have a material adverse effect on our
ability to compete in the marketplace.
If we do not obtain protection under the Hatch-Waxman Act and similar legislation outside of the United States
by extending the patent terms and obtaining data exclusivity for our product candidates, our business may be
materially harmed.
Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of FDA marketing approval of odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or
potential future product candidates of ours, if any, one or more of our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent
term restoration under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, referred to as the Hatch-
Waxman Act. The Hatch-Waxman Act permits a patent restoration term of up to five years as compensation for patent
term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process. However, we may not be granted an
extension if, for example, we fail to apply within applicable deadlines, we fail to apply prior to expiration of relevant
patents or if we otherwise fail to satisfy applicable requirements. Moreover, the applicable time period or the scope of
patent protection afforded could be less than we request. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or restoration
or the term of any such extension is less than we request, the period during which we will have the right to exclusively
market our products will be shortened and our competitors may obtain approval of competing products following our
patent expiration, and our revenue could be reduced, possibly materially. In the event that we are unable to obtain any
patent term extension, the issued U.S. composition of matter patent for odevixibat is expected to expire in 2022
assuming it withstands any challenge. In the event that we are unable to obtain any patent term extension, the issued U.S.
composition of matter patent for elobixibat is expected to expire in 2022, assuming it withstands any challenge. We
expect that the other U.S. patents and patent applications for odevixibat and elobixibat, if issued, and if the appropriate
maintenance, renewal, annuity or other governmental fees are paid, would expire from 2031 to 2039.
If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would
be harmed.
In addition to seeking patents for some of our technology and products, we also rely on trade secrets, including
unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary and confidential information, to maintain our competitive
position. We seek to protect these trade secrets, in part, by entering into nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements
with parties who have access to them, such as our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators,
contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors and other third parties. However, we cannot guarantee that we have
executed these agreements with each party that may have or have had access to our trade secrets or that the agreements
we have executed will provide adequate protection. Any party with whom we have executed such an agreement may
breach that agreement and disclose our proprietary or confidential information, including our trade secrets, and we may
not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or
misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition,
some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. If any of our trade
secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent
them, or those to whom they communicate the trade secret, from using that technology or information to compete with
us. If any of our trade secrets, particularly unpatented know-how, were to be obtained or independently developed by a
competitor, our competitive position would be harmed.
72
Risks Related to Regulatory Approval and Marketing of Our Product Candidates
A rare pediatric disease designation may not lead to the receipt of a rare pediatric disease priority review
voucher, even if odevixibat is approved.
The FDA has awarded rare pediatric disease priority review vouchers, or PRVs, to sponsors of drug products
intended to treat rare pediatric disease products if the treatment and product application meet certain criteria. Under this
program, upon the approval of a qualifying NDA or biologics license application, BLA, for the treatment or prevention
of a rare pediatric disease, the sponsor of the application may be eligible for a PRV that can be used to obtain priority
review for a subsequent NDA or BLA. The PRV may be sold or transferred an unlimited number of times. The FDA has
granted rare pediatric disease designation for odevixibat for PFIC. The PRV program is now set to expire at the end of
2024, or 2026 for products that receive rare pediatric disease designation by 2024.Therefore, there is no guarantee that
we will receive a PRV for odevixibat even if it is approved by the FDA to treat a rare pediatric disease.
If prior to any marketing approval in the European Union of odevixibat to treat PFIC, Mirum’s maralixibat is
approved in the European Union to treat PFIC and at the time of approval maintains its designation as an orphan
medicinal product, and if odevixibat is deemed to be a similar medicinal product, within the meaning of E.U. law, to
maralixibat, we may not be able to obtain marketing approval of odevixibat in the European Union for a significant
period of time. In addition, odevixibat may not be entitled to orphan drug exclusivity for odevixibat in the United
States or European Union notwithstanding its current orphan designation.
Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United States and European Union, may designate
drugs for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. The FDA has granted orphan drug designation to
odevixibat, which is an IBAT inhibitor, for the treatment of PFIC, biliary atresia, PBC and ALGS, and the European
Commission has designated odevixibat as an orphan medicinal product for the treatment of PFIC, biliary atresia, PBC
and ALGS. Mirum’s maralixibat, which has also been reported to be an IBAT inhibitor, has also been granted orphan
drug designation by the FDA and as an orphan medicinal product by the European Commission.
Generally, if a designated orphan medicinal product receives the first marketing approval in the European Union
for the orphan indication for which it has been designated and maintains under applicable criteria its designation as an
orphan medicinal product at the time of approval, the product is entitled to a period of market exclusivity in the
European Union. Subject to certain exceptions, this market exclusivity precludes the EMA from accepting another
marketing application for a “similar medicinal product” for the same indication for 10 years, which can be reduced to
six years if a drug no longer meets the criteria for orphan drug designation (including if the drug is sufficiently profitable
so that market exclusivity is no longer justified). Under E.U. law, a “similar medicinal product” is a medicinal product
that contains a similar active substance or substances as contained in the authorized orphan medicinal product and that is
intended for the same therapeutic indication and a “similar active substance” is an active substance that is identical or
has the same principal molecular structural features (but not necessarily all of the same molecular features) and acts via
the same mechanism as the authorized orphan medicinal product.
Maralixibat has been evaluated to date in a greater number of PFIC patients than has odevixibat. If (1) prior to
marketing approval, if any, of odevixibat to treat PFIC in the European Union, maralixibat is approved in the European
Union to treat PFIC and at the time of approval maintains its designation as an orphan medicinal product, (2) odevixibat
is deemed to be a similar medicinal product to maralixibat and (3) we are not able to establish that odevixibat provides a
significant benefit to patients compared with maralixibat, we may not be able to obtain marketing approval of odevixibat
in the European Union for at least several years. We understand that Mirum’s MAA for maralixibat for the treatment of
patients with PFIC type 2 has been accepted for review by the EMA.
Moreover, we may not be able to obtain orphan drug exclusivity in the United States or the European Union for
odevixibat for PFIC or any other indication, notwithstanding the fact that odevixibat has been designated as an orphan
drug in the United States or an orphan medicinal product in the European Union. For example, if a competitive product
that is the same drug as odevixibat is shown to be clinically superior, any orphan drug exclusivity that we have obtained
in the United States will not block the approval of such competitive product. In addition, orphan drug exclusivity will not
73
prevent the approval in the United States of a product that is the same drug as our product candidate if the FDA finds
that we cannot assure the availability of sufficient quantities of the drug to meet the needs of the persons with the disease
or condition for which the drug was designated. Moreover, if prior to marketing approval, if any, of odevixibat to treat
PFIC in the European Union, maralixibat or any other product is approved in the European Union to treat PFIC,
odevixibat may not be entitled to orphan drug exclusivity if we are not able to establish that it provides a significant
benefit to patients compared with maralixibat. Finally, even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a product, that
exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drug products can be approved
for the same condition.
Even if we complete the necessary clinical trials, the marketing approval process is expensive, time consuming
and uncertain and may prevent us from obtaining approvals for the commercialization of some or all of our product
candidates. If we are not able to obtain, or if there are delays in obtaining, required marketing approvals, we will not
be able to commercialize our product candidates, and our ability to generate revenue will be materially impaired.
Our product candidates, including odevixibat, A3907 and A2342, and the activities associated with their
development and commercialization, including their design, testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy, recordkeeping,
labeling, storage, approval, advertising, promotion, sale and distribution, are subject to comprehensive regulation by the
FDA and by comparable authorities in other countries. Failure to obtain marketing approval for a product candidate will
prevent us from commercializing the product candidate. In December 2020, we announced that we submitted an NDA to
the FDA and an MAA to the EMA, seeking approval of odevixibat for the treatment of patients with PFIC. Other than
the approval of elobixibat received by EA Pharma for the treatment of chronic constipation in Japan, we have not
received approval to market odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or any other product candidate from regulatory authorities in any
jurisdiction.
We have only limited experience in filing and supporting the applications necessary to obtain marketing approvals
for product candidates and have relied on third-party contract research organizations to assist us in this process. Securing
marketing approval requires the submission of extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting information to
regulatory authorities for each therapeutic indication to establish the product candidate’s safety and effectiveness.
Securing marketing approval also requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to,
and inspection of manufacturing facilities by, the regulatory authorities. Regulatory authorities may determine that
odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or any potential future product candidate of ours is not effective, is only moderately effective
or has undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicities, safety profiles or other characteristics that preclude us from
obtaining marketing approval or that prevent or limit commercial use.
The process of obtaining marketing approvals is expensive, may take many years, if approval is obtained at all,
and can vary substantially based upon a variety of factors, including the type, complexity and novelty of the product
candidates involved. Changes in marketing approval policies during the development period, changes in or the
enactment of additional statutes or regulations, or changes in regulatory review for each submitted product application,
may cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application. Regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the
approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that our data are insufficient for approval and
require additional preclinical studies, clinical trials or other trials. In addition, varying interpretations of the data obtained
from preclinical and clinical testing could delay, limit or prevent marketing approval of a product candidate. Any
marketing approval we ultimately obtain may be limited or subject to restrictions or post-approval commitments that
render the approved product not commercially viable. If we experience delays in obtaining approval or if we fail to
obtain approval of our product candidates, the commercial prospects for our product candidates may be harmed and our
ability to generate revenues will be materially impaired.
Additionally, on June 23, 2016, the electorate in the United Kingdom voted in favor of leaving the European
Union, commonly referred to as “Brexit.” On March 29, 2017, the country formally notified the European Union of its
intention to withdraw pursuant to Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the
European Union took effect on January 31, 2020, the effective date of the withdrawal agreement, with a transition period
that ended on December 31, 2020. Since a significant proportion of the regulatory framework in the United Kingdom
was, prior to Brexit, derived from European Union directives and regulations, Brexit and the new Trade and Cooperation
Agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom that took provisional effect on January 1, 2021 could
74
materially impact the regulatory regime with respect to the approval of any product candidates in the United Kingdom.
Any delay in obtaining, or an inability to obtain, any marketing approvals, as a result of Brexit or otherwise, would
prevent us from commercializing any product candidates in the United Kingdom and restrict our ability to generate
revenue and achieve and sustain profitability. If any of these outcomes occur, we may be forced to restrict or delay
efforts to seek regulatory approval in the United Kingdom and/or European Union for our product candidates, which
could significantly and materially harm our business.
Our failure to obtain marketing approval in jurisdictions other than the United States and Europe would
prevent our product candidates from being marketed in these other jurisdictions. Any approval that we are granted
for our product candidates in the United States or Europe would not assure approval of product candidates in the
other or in any other jurisdiction.
In order to market and sell odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or any potential future product candidate of ours in
jurisdictions other than the United States or Europe, we or a current or potential future licensee or collaborator must
obtain separate marketing approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The approval
procedure varies among countries and can involve additional testing. The time required to obtain approval may differ
from that required to obtain FDA or EMA approval. The regulatory approval process outside the United States and
Europe generally includes all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA and EMA approval. In addition, some countries
outside the United States and Europe require approval of the sales price of a drug before it can be marketed. In many
countries, separate procedures must be followed to obtain reimbursement. We or a current or potential future licensee or
collaborator may not obtain marketing, pricing or reimbursement approvals outside the United States and Europe on a
timely basis, if at all.
Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by the EMA, approval by the EMA does not assure approval by
the FDA, and approval of either or both of the FDA and EMA does not assure approval by regulatory authorities in other
countries or jurisdictions. Likewise, approval by any regulatory authority in any country or jurisdiction outside the
United States or Europe, such as Japan, does not assure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or
jurisdictions or by the FDA or EMA. We and any current or potential future licensee or collaborator may not be able to
file for marketing approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our product candidates in any
market. Marketing approvals in countries outside the United States and Europe do not ensure pricing approvals in those
countries or in any other countries, and marketing approvals and pricing approvals do not ensure that reimbursement will
be obtained.
Our ability to obtain and maintain conditional marketing authorizations in the European Union is limited to
specific circumstances and subject to several conditions and obligations. A failure to renew any conditional approval
that we obtain prior to full approval for the applicable indication would prevent us from continuing to market our
products.
Conditional marketing authorizations in the European Union based on incomplete clinical data may be granted for
a limited number of listed medicinal products for human use, including products designated as orphan medicinal
products under E.U. law, if (1) the risk-benefit balance of the product is positive, (2) it is likely that the applicant will be
in a position to provide the required comprehensive clinical trial data, (3) unmet medical needs will be fulfilled and
(4) the benefit to public health of the immediate availability on the market of the medicinal product outweighs the risk
inherent in the fact that additional data are still required. Specific obligations, including with respect to the completion of
ongoing or new studies or trials, and with respect to the collection of pharmacovigilance data, may be specified in the
conditional marketing authorization. Conditional marketing authorizations are valid for one year and may be renewed
annually, if the risk-benefit balance remains positive, and after an assessment of the need for additional or modified
conditions. Even if we obtain conditional approval for odevixibat for the treatment of PFIC or any other pediatric
cholestatic liver disease or disorder, we may not be able to renew such conditional approval.
75
Even if we obtain marketing approval for our product candidates, the terms of approvals and ongoing
regulation of our products may limit how we manufacture or market our products and compliance with such
requirements may involve substantial resources, which could materially impair our ability to generate profit.
Even if marketing approval of a product candidate is granted, an approved product and its manufacturer and
marketer are subject to ongoing review and extensive regulation, including the possible requirement to implement a risk
evaluation and mitigation strategy or to conduct costly post-marketing studies or clinical trials and surveillance to
monitor the safety or efficacy of the product. We must also comply with requirements concerning advertising and
promotion for any of our product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Promotional communications with
respect to prescription drugs are subject to a variety of legal and regulatory restrictions and must be consistent with the
information in the product’s approved labeling. Thus, we will not be able to promote any products we develop for
indications or uses for which they are not approved. In addition, manufacturers of approved products and those
manufacturers’ facilities are required to ensure that quality control and manufacturing procedures conform to cGMP,
which include requirements relating to quality control and quality assurance as well as the corresponding maintenance of
records and documentation and reporting requirements. We and our contract manufacturers could be subject to periodic
unannounced inspections by the FDA to monitor and ensure compliance with cGMP.
Accordingly, to the extent we receive marketing approval for one or more of our product candidates, we and our
contract manufacturers will continue to expend time, money and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including
manufacturing, production, product surveillance and quality control. If we are not able to comply with post-approval
regulatory requirements, we could have marketing approval for any of our products withdrawn by regulatory authorities
and our ability to market any future products could be limited, which could adversely affect our ability to achieve or
sustain profitability. Thus, the cost of compliance with post-approval regulations may have a negative effect on our
operating results and financial condition.
Any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval will be subject to strict enforcement of post-
marketing requirements and we could be subject to substantial penalties, including withdrawal of our products from
the market, if we fail to comply with all regulatory requirements or if we experience unanticipated problems with our
products, when and if any of them are approved.
Any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval, along with the manufacturing processes, post-
approval clinical data, labeling, advertising and promotional activities for such product, will be subject to continual
requirements of and review by the FDA and other regulatory authorities. These requirements include, but are not limited
to, restrictions governing promotion of an approved product, submissions of safety and other post-marketing information
and reports, registration and listing requirements, cGMP requirements relating to manufacturing, quality control, quality
assurance and corresponding maintenance of records and documents, and requirements regarding the distribution of
samples to physicians and recordkeeping.
The FDA closely regulates compliance with all requirements governing prescription drug products, including
requirements pertaining to marketing and promotion of drugs in accordance with the provisions of the approved labeling
and manufacturing of products in accordance with cGMP requirements. Violations of such requirements may lead to
investigations alleging violations of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and other statutes, including the False Claims Act
and other federal and state health care fraud and abuse laws as well as state consumer protection laws. Our failure to
comply with all regulatory requirements, and later discovery of previously unknown adverse events or other problems
with our products, manufacturers or manufacturing processes, may yield various results, including:
•
•
•
•
litigation involving patients taking our products;
restrictions on such products, manufacturers or manufacturing processes;
restrictions on the labeling or marketing of a product;
restrictions on product distribution or use;
76
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
requirements to conduct post-marketing studies or clinical trials;
warning or untitled letters;
withdrawal of the products from the market;
refusal to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications that we submit;
recall of products;
fines, restitution or disgorgement of profits or revenues;
suspension or withdrawal of marketing approvals;
damage to relationships with any potential collaborators;
unfavorable press coverage and damage to our reputation;
refusal to permit the import or export of our products;
product seizure; or
injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
Our noncompliance, or noncompliance by any future licensee or collaborator, with regulatory requirements
relating to safety monitoring or pharmacovigilance, to the development of products for the pediatric population or to the
protection of personal information can lead to significant penalties and sanctions.
Fast track designation by the FDA may not actually lead to a faster development or regulatory review or
approval process.
If a drug is intended for the treatment of a serious or life threatening condition and the drug demonstrates the
potential to address unmet medical needs for the condition, the drug sponsor may apply for FDA fast track designation.
The designation offers the sponsor opportunities for interactions with the FDA review team and the possibility of a
rolling review for certain portions of the marketing application. The FDA has granted fast track designation for
odevixibat for pruritus associated with PFIC, but there is no assurance that odevixibat will receive marketing approval
from the FDA or that approval will be granted within any particular timeframe. We may also seek fast track designation
for other current or potential future product candidates of ours. Even if the FDA grants fast track designation to one or
more of these product candidates, we may not experience a faster development process, review or approval compared to
conventional FDA procedures. In addition, the FDA may withdraw fast track designation that may in the future be
granted to any of our product candidates if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from our
clinical development program for that product candidate. Fast track designation alone does not guarantee qualification
for the FDA’s priority review procedures.
Priority review designation by the FDA may not lead to a faster regulatory review or approval process and, in
any event, does not assure FDA approval.
If the FDA determines that a product candidate intended to treat a serious disease, if approved, would provide a
significant improvement in safety or effectiveness of the treatment of the disease, the FDA may designate the drug
application for that product candidate for priority review. A priority review designation means that the goal for the FDA
to review the marketing application is six months from the date of NDA acceptance for filing, rather than the standard
review period of ten months from the date of NDA acceptance for filing. A priority review designation does not
77
necessarily mean a faster regulatory review process or necessarily confer any advantage with respect to approval
compared to conventional FDA procedures. Receiving a priority review designation from the FDA does not guarantee
approval of the drug application within the six-month review cycle or any time thereafter.
Our relationships with customers, healthcare providers and professionals and third-party payors will be subject
to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to
criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future
earnings.
Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors play a primary role in the recommendation and
prescription of any product candidate, including odevixibat, A3907 or A2342, for which we obtain marketing approval.
Our future arrangements with customers, healthcare providers and professionals, and third-party payors may expose us
to broadly applicable federal and state fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the
business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we market, sell or distribute any product candidate
for which we obtain marketing approval.
The federal anti-kickback statute prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting,
offering, receiving or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward either the
referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may
be made, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare and Medicaid. This statute has been
broadly interpreted to apply to manufacturer arrangements with prescribers, purchasers and pharmacy benefit managers,
among others. Several other countries, including the United Kingdom, have enacted similar anti-kickback laws and
regulations.
The federal False Claims Act imposes civil penalties, and provides for civil whistleblower or qui tam actions,
against individuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for
payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money
to the federal government. Both the government and qui tam relators have brought False Claims Act actions against
pharmaceutical companies on the theory that their practices have caused false claims to be submitted to the government.
The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, imposes criminal and civil
liability for executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or for knowingly and willfully falsifying,
concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement in connection with the delivery of or
payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for
Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH Act, and its implementing regulations, also imposes obligations,
including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of
individually identifiable health information.
The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act requirements under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
of 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, referred to together as the
Affordable Care Act, require manufacturers of FDA-approved drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies covered by
Medicare or Medicaid to report to the Department of Health and Human Services information related to payments and
other transfers of value made to or at the request of covered recipients, such as physicians and teaching hospitals, and
physician ownership and investment interests in such manufacturers. Among other payments, the law requires payments
made to physicians and teaching hospitals for clinical trials be disclosed.
Analogous state laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, may apply to sales or
marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by nongovernmental third-party
payors, including private insurers. Some state laws require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical
industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines, or the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal
government, in addition to requiring drug manufacturers to report information related to payments to physicians and
other health care providers or marketing expenditures to the extent that those laws impose requirements that are more
stringent than the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. State and foreign laws also govern the privacy and security of
78
health information in some circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not
preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and
regulations will involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business
practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or
other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other
governmental regulations that may apply, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties,
damages, fines, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and the
curtailment or restructuring of our operations. Violation of certain of these laws could also result in exclusion,
suspension and debarment from government funded healthcare programs. Exclusion, suspension or debarment would
significantly impact our ability to commercialize, sell or distribute any product candidate for which we obtain regulatory
approval. If any of the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we expect to do business are found to be not
in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including
exclusions from government funded healthcare programs.
Legislation may increase the difficulty and cost for us to obtain marketing approval of and commercialize our
product candidates and affect the prices we may obtain for any product that receives marketing approval.
In the United States and in some other jurisdictions, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory
changes and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system that could prevent or delay marketing approval of
odevixibat, A3907, A2342 or any potential future product candidates of ours, restrict or regulate post-approval activities,
or affect our ability to profitably sell any product candidates, including odevixibat A3907, or A2342, for which we
obtain marketing approval. In addition, increased scrutiny by the U.S. Congress of the FDA’s approval process may
significantly delay or prevent marketing approval, as well as subject us to more stringent product labeling and post-
marketing testing and other requirements.
In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, or the
Medicare Modernization Act, changed the way Medicare covers and pays for pharmaceutical products. The legislation
expanded Medicare coverage for drug purchases by the elderly and introduced a new reimbursement methodology based
on average sales prices for physician administered drugs. In addition, this legislation provided authority for limiting the
number of drugs that will be covered in any therapeutic class. Cost reduction initiatives and other provisions of this
legislation could decrease the coverage and price that we receive for any approved products. While the Medicare
Modernization Act applies only to drug benefits for Medicare beneficiaries, private payors often follow Medicare
coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates. Therefore, any reduction in
reimbursement that results from the Medicare Modernization Act may result in a similar reduction in payments from
private payors.
In March 2010, the Affordable Care Act, or ACA, became law in the United States. The ACA is a sweeping law
intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhance remedies
against fraud and abuse, add new transparency requirements for health care and health insurance industries, impose new
taxes and fees on the health industry and impose additional health policy reforms. Congress has expressed an intention to
repeal or repeal and replace the ACA, and as a result certain sections of the ACA have not been fully implemented or
effectively repealed. The uncertainty around the future of the ACA, and in particular the impact to reimbursement levels,
may lead to uncertainty or delay in the purchasing decisions of our customers, which may in turn negatively impact our
product sales. If there are not adequate reimbursement levels, our business and results of operations could be adversely
affected. Similarly, there are a number of state and local legislative and regulatory efforts related to drug pricing,
including a drug price transparency law in Vermont that applies to pharmaceutical manufacturers, that may have an
impact on our business.
In addition, the Drug Supply Chain Security Act imposes new obligations on manufacturers of pharmaceutical
products related to product tracking and tracing. Legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand post-
approval requirements and restrict sales and promotional activities for pharmaceutical products. We are unsure whether
79
additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether the current regulations, guidance or interpretations will be
changed, or whether such changes will have any impact on our business.
In the European Union, similar political, economic and regulatory developments may affect our ability to
profitably commercialize our products. In addition to continuing pressure on prices and cost containment measures,
legislative developments at the European Union or E.U. member state level may result in significant additional
requirements or obstacles that may increase our operating costs.
We expect that the ACA, as well as other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, may result
in more rigorous coverage criteria and lower reimbursement, and additional downward pressure on the price that we
receive for any approved product. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government-funded
programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. The implementation of cost containment
measures or other healthcare reforms could result in reduced demand for our product candidates or additional pricing
pressures, and may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our drugs.
We are subject to anti-corruption laws, as well as export control laws, data protection laws, customs laws,
sanctions laws and other laws governing our operations. If we fail to comply with these laws, we could be subject to
civil or criminal penalties, other remedial measures and legal expenses, which could adversely affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Our operations are subject to anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA,
and other anti-corruption laws that apply in countries where we do business and may do business in the future. The
FCPA and these other laws generally prohibit us, our officers, and our employees and intermediaries from bribing, being
bribed or making other prohibited payments to government officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain
some other business advantage. We may in the future operate in jurisdictions that pose a high risk of potential FCPA
violations and we may participate in collaborations and relationships with third parties whose actions could potentially
subject us to liability under the FCPA or local anti-corruption laws. In addition, we cannot predict the nature, scope or
effect of future regulatory requirements to which our international operations might be subject or the manner in which
existing laws might be administered or interpreted.
We are also subject to other laws and regulations governing our international operations, including regulations
administered by the government of the United States and authorities in the European Union, including applicable export
control regulations, economic sanctions on countries and persons, customs requirements and currency exchange
regulations, collectively referred to as the Trade Control laws. In addition, various statutes and rules in Europe and
elsewhere around the world regulate privacy and data protection, which affect our collection, use, storage, and transfer of
information both abroad and in the United States. New laws and regulations are periodically being enacted in this area,
which remains in a state of flux. Monitoring and complying with these laws requires substantial financial resources. In
particular, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, took effect in May 2018, and will
require us to meet new and more stringent requirements regarding the handling of personal data about European Union
residents. The GDPR is a complex law and the regulatory guidance is still evolving. Furthermore, many of the countries
within the European Union are still in the process of drafting supplementary data protection legislation in key fields
where the GDPR allows for national variation, including the fields of clinical study and other health-related information.
Failure to meet GDPR requirements could result in penalties of up to 4% of our worldwide revenue. While we have
taken steps to comply with the GDPR, including reviewing our security procedures, updating our website, revising our
clinical study informed consent forms, and entering into data processing agreements with relevant contractors, we cannot
assure you that our efforts to remain in compliance will be fully successful.
There is no assurance that we will be completely effective in ensuring our compliance with all applicable anti-
corruption laws, including the FCPA or other legal requirements, including Trade Control laws. If we are not in
compliance with the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws or Trade Control laws, we may be subject to criminal and civil
penalties, disgorgement and other sanctions and remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could have an adverse
impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Likewise, any investigation of any
80
potential violations of the FCPA, other anti-corruption laws or Trade Control laws by U.S. or other authorities could also
have an adverse impact on our reputation, our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We rely significantly on information technology and any failure, inadequacy, interruption or security lapse of
that technology or loss of data, including any cyber security incidents, could compromise sensitive information
related to our business, prevent us from accessing critical information or expose us to liability which could harm our
ability to operate our business effectively and adversely affect our business and reputation.
In the ordinary course of our business, we, our contract research organizations and other third parties on which we
rely collect and store sensitive data, including legally protected patient health information, personally identifiable
information about our employees, intellectual property, and proprietary business information. We manage and maintain
our applications and data utilizing on-site systems. These applications and data encompass a wide variety of business-
critical information including research and development information and business and financial information.
The secure processing, storage, maintenance and transmission of this critical information is vital to our operations
and business strategy. Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and those of third
parties with which we contract are vulnerable to damage from cyber-attacks, computer viruses, breaches unauthorized
access, interruptions due to employee error or malfeasance or other disruptions, or damage from natural disasters,
terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures. Any such event could compromise our networks and the
information stored there could be accessed by unauthorized parties, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. We have measures
in place that are designed to detect and respond to such security incidents and breaches of privacy and security mandates.
Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws
that protect the privacy of personal information, government enforcement actions and regulatory penalties. Unauthorized
access, loss or dissemination could also disrupt our operations, including our ability to conduct research, development
and commercialization activities, process and prepare company financial information, manage various general and
administrative aspects of our business and damage our reputation, in addition to possibly requiring substantial
expenditures of resources to remedy, any of which could adversely affect our business. The loss of clinical trial data
could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the
data. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will promptly detect any such disruption or security breach, if at all.
To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or
inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and our product research,
development and commercialization efforts could be delayed.
81
Risks Related to Our Business Operations, Employee Matters and Managing Growth
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to
accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, stockholders could lose confidence in our
financial and other public reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of our common stock.
Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and,
together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, is designed to prevent fraud. Pursuant to Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404, we are required to furnish a report by our management on the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting. As a non-accelerated filer, we are not required this year to obtain an attestation
report on internal control over financial reporting from our independent registered public accounting firm. Ensuring that
we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate
financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that will need to be evaluated frequently.
Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could
cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing by us conducted in connection with
Section 404 or any future testing by our independent registered public accounting firm may reveal deficiencies in our
internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses or that may require prospective or
retroactive changes to our consolidated financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement.
Inferior internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could
have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock. While our management concluded that our internal
control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2020, there is no assurance that we or our independent
registered public accounting firm will not identify material weaknesses in the future, which could have a material
adverse impact on our business and the trading price of our common stock.
Our future success depends on our ability to retain our chief executive officer and other key executives and to
attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.
We are highly dependent on Ron Cooper, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and other principal members
of our management and scientific teams. Although we have formal employment agreements with each of our executive
officers, these agreements do not prevent our executives from terminating their employment with us at any time. We do
not maintain “key person” insurance on any of our executive officers. The unplanned loss of the services of any of these
persons could materially impact the achievement of our research, development and commercialization objectives.
Recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, clinical, manufacturing and sales and marketing personnel, including
in the United States and Sweden, will also be critical to our success. We may not be able to attract and retain these
personnel on acceptable terms given the competition among numerous biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies for
similar personnel. We also experience competition for the hiring of scientific and clinical personnel from universities
and research institutions. In addition, we rely on consultants and advisors, including scientific and clinical advisors, to
assist us in formulating our research and development and commercialization strategy. Our consultants and advisors may
be employed by employers other than us and may have commitments under consulting or advisory contracts with other
entities that may limit their availability to us.
We expect to expand our capabilities and, as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth,
which could disrupt our operations.
We expect to experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations,
particularly in the areas of drug development, regulatory affairs, finance and administration and sales and marketing. To
manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and
financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our
limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such
anticipated growth, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train
additional qualified personnel. The physical expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our
82
management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our
business plans or disrupt our operations.
We incur significant costs and demands as a result of operating as a public company.
We incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses to meet our obligations as a publicly traded company. In
addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market and other
applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies, including establishment
and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Stockholder activism,
the current political environment and the current high level of government intervention and regulatory reform may lead
to substantial new regulations and disclosure obligations, which may lead to additional compliance costs and impact the
manner in which we operate our business in ways that are not currently anticipated. Our management and other
personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and
regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming
and costly. For example, these rules and regulations may make it difficult and expensive for us to maintain director and
officer liability insurance coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals
to serve on our board of directors or as our executive officers, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and
could cause our business or stock price to suffer.
We are exposed to risks related to currency exchange rates.
We conduct a significant portion of our operations outside of the United States. Because our consolidated financial
statements are presented in U.S. dollars, changes in currency exchange rates have had and could have in the future a
significant effect on our operating results when our operating results are translated into U.S. dollars. Exchange rate
fluctuations between local currencies, the euro and the dollar create risk in several ways, including the following:
weakening of the dollar may increase the cost of overseas research and development expenses and the cost of sourced
product components outside the United States; strengthening of the dollar may decrease the value of our revenues
denominated in other currencies; the exchange rates on-nondollar transactions and cash deposits can distort our financial
results; and commercial pricing and profit margins may be affected.
Our present and potential future international operations may expose us to business, political, operational and
financial risks associated with doing business outside of the United States.
Our business is subject to risks associated with conducting business internationally. Some of our operations are
located outside of the United States. Doing business internationally involves a number of risks, including but not limited
to:
• multiple, conflicting and changing laws and regulations such as privacy regulations, tax laws, export and
import restrictions, employment laws, regulatory requirements, and other governmental approvals, permits
and licenses;
•
•
•
•
•
failure by us to obtain and maintain regulatory approvals for the use of our products in various countries;
rejection or qualification of foreign clinical trial data by the competent authorities of other countries;
additional potentially relevant third-party patent and other intellectual property rights that may be necessary to
develop and commercialize our products and drug candidates;
complexities and difficulties in obtaining, maintaining, enforcing and defending our patent and other
intellectual property rights;
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;
83
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
complexities associated with managing multiple payor reimbursement regimes, government payors or patient
self-pay systems;
limits in our ability to penetrate international markets;
restrictions on traveling outside the United States;
financial risks, such as longer payment cycles, difficulty collecting accounts receivable, the impact of local
and regional financial crises on demand and payment for our products and exposure to foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations;
natural disasters, pandemics, political and economic instability, including wars, terrorism and political unrest,
outbreak of disease, boycotts, curtailment of trade and other business restrictions, implementation of tariffs;
certain expenses including, among others, expenses for travel, translation and insurance; and
regulatory and compliance risks that relate to anti-corruption compliance and record-keeping that may fall
within the purview of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, its accounting provisions or its anti-bribery
provisions or provisions of anti-corruption or anti-bribery laws in other countries.
Any of these factors could harm our ongoing international clinical operations and supply chain, as well as any
future international expansion
The United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union could adversely impact operations, make it more
difficult for us to do business in Europe and impose additional regulatory costs and challenges in securing approval
of our product candidate.
On June 23, 2016, the electorate in the United Kingdom voted in favor of leaving the European Union, commonly
referred to as “Brexit.” Thereafter, on March 29, 2017, the country formally notified the European Union of its intention
to withdraw pursuant to Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European
Union took effect on January 31, 2020, the effective date of the withdrawal agreement, with a transition period that
ended on December 31, 2020. The United Kingdom entered into a trade agreement known as the Trade and Cooperation
Agreement, which is provisionally applicable as of January 1, 2021 but has not yet been ratified by the European
Parliament. The United Kingdom’s withdrawal could lead to a period of considerable uncertainty and volatility,
particularly in relation to United Kingdom financial and banking markets. Weakening of economic conditions or
economic uncertainties tend to harm our business, and if such conditions emerge in the United Kingdom or in the rest of
Europe, it may have a material adverse effect on operations and sales.
Currency exchange rates in the pound sterling and the euro with respect to each other and the U.S. dollar have
already been adversely affected by Brexit and that may continue to be the case. In addition, the United Kingdom and the
European Union have entered into a new Trade and Cooperation Agreement, which is designed to implement a new
structure for trade agreements involving United Kingdom and the European Union, which may result in increased trade
barriers and could make doing business in Europe more difficult.
We may also face new and additional regulatory costs and challenges from the new Trade and Cooperation
Agreement that could have a material adverse effect on operations. Since a significant proportion of the regulatory
framework in the United Kingdom was, prior to Brexit, derived from European Union directives and regulations, the
new post-Brexit framework could materially impact the regulatory regime with respect to the approval of our product
candidates in the United Kingdom or the European Union. We are currently evaluating the potential impacts on our
business of the new Trade and Cooperation Agreement, including provisions relating to the manufacturing of medicinal
products. Any delays to manufacturing or delays in obtaining, or an inability to obtain, any marketing approvals, as a
result of Brexit, the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, or otherwise, would prevent us from commercializing product
candidates in the United Kingdom and/or the European Union and restrict our ability to generate revenue and achieve
84
and sustain profitability. If any of these outcomes occur, we may be forced to restrict or delay efforts to seek regulatory
approval in the United Kingdom and/or European Union for our product candidates, which could significantly and
materially harm our business.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our stock price is expected to continue to be volatile, and the market price of our common stock may drop.
The market price of our common stock could continue to be subject to significant fluctuations. Market prices for
securities of clinical-stage pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other life sciences companies have historically been
particularly volatile. Some of the factors that may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the progress, scope, cost, duration or results of our current and any future clinical trials of our product
candidates;
the timing and success of submission, acceptance and approval of regulatory filings;
our ability to obtain regulatory approvals for our product candidates, delays or failures to obtain such
approvals and any restrictions, limitations or warnings in the label of any approved product candidates;
failure of any of our product candidates, if approved, to achieve commercial success;
issues in manufacturing our approved products, if any, or product candidates;
the entry into, or termination of, licensing, collaboration or similar agreements, or other key agreements, and
the agreement terms;
the initiation of, material developments in, or conclusion of litigation to enforce or defend any of our
intellectual property rights or defend against the intellectual property rights of others;
announcements by commercial partners or competitors of new commercial products, clinical progress or the
lack thereof, significant contracts, commercial relationships or capital commitments;
adverse publicity relating to the markets in which we compete, including with respect to other products and
potential products in such markets;
the introduction of technological innovations or new therapies that compete with our product candidates or
products, if any;
the loss of key employees;
changes in estimates or recommendations by securities analysts, if any, who cover our common stock;
low trading volume;
general and industry-specific economic conditions that may affect our research and development
expenditures;
changes in the structure of health care payment systems;
failure to maintain compliance with listing requirements of The Nasdaq Capital Market; and
85
•
period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results.
Moreover, the stock markets in general have experienced substantial volatility that has often been unrelated to the
operating performance of individual companies. These broad market fluctuations may also adversely affect the trading
price of our common stock.
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, stockholders have often
instituted class action securities litigation against those companies. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in
substantial costs and diversion of management attention and resources, which could significantly harm our profitability
and reputation.
We do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We currently expect to retain our future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result,
capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be the sole source of gain, if any, of our stockholders for the
foreseeable future.
Provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us, which
may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or
remove our current management.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or
other change in control of us that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which stockholders
might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be
willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock, thereby depressing the market price of our common stock. In
addition, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current
management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors. Because our
board of directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions could in turn
affect any attempt by our stockholders to replace current members of our management team.
Among others, these provisions:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
establish a classified board of directors such that not all members of the board are elected at one time;
allow the authorized number of our directors to be changed only by resolution of our board of directors;
limit the manner in which stockholders can remove directors from the board of directors;
establish advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals that can be acted on at stockholder meetings
and nominations to our board of directors;
require that stockholder actions must be effected at a duly called stockholder meeting and prohibit actions by
our stockholders by written consent;
limit who may call stockholder meetings;
authorize our board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could be used
to institute a stockholder rights plan or “poison pill” that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a
potential hostile acquirer, effectively preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our board of
directors; and
require the approval of the holders of at least 75% of the votes that all of our stockholders would be entitled
to cast to amend or repeal certain provisions of our charter or bylaws.
86
In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits a person who owns 15% or more of our outstanding
voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the
person acquired 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a
prescribed manner.
Item 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Item 2.
PROPERTIES
Our portfolio of commercial real estate leases consists of office space for our corporate headquarters in Boston,
Massachusetts and for administrative space in Göteborg, Sweden, both of which are accounted for as operating leases.
Item 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.
Item 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
87
Item 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
PART II
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “ALBO”.
Stockholders
As of January 31, 2021, we had 19,113,291 outstanding shares of common stock and no outstanding shares of
preferred stock. As of January 31, 2021, there were approximately 24 holders of record of our common stock.
Unregistered Sales of Securities
Not applicable.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not purchase any of our registered equity securities during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Item 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
88
Item 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together
with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Form 10-K,
including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-
looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should read the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K (see Part I, Item 1A) for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the results described in or implied by any forward-looking statement contained in the following
discussion and analysis.
Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. As of December 31, 2020, we had an accumulated
deficit of $266.8 million. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses as we
continue our development of, and seek marketing approvals for, our product candidates, prepare for and begin the
commercialization of any approved products, and add infrastructure and personnel to support our product development
efforts and operations as a public company in the United States.
As a clinical-stage company, our revenues, expenses and results of operations are likely to fluctuate significantly
from quarter to quarter and year to year. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations
should not be relied upon as indicative of our future performance.
As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $251.3 million in cash and cash equivalents.
Financial Operations Overview
The following discussion sets forth certain components of our consolidated statements of operations as well as
factors that impact those items.
Revenue
We generate revenue from the receipt of royalty revenue, upfront or license fees and milestone payments. License
agreements with commercial partners generally include nonrefundable upfront fees and milestone payments, the receipt
of which is dependent upon the achievement of specified development, regulatory or commercial milestone events, as
well as royalties on product sales of licensed products, if and when such product sales occur, and payments for
pharmaceutical ingredient or related procurement services. For these agreements, management applies judgment in the
allocation of total agreement consideration to the performance obligations on a reliable basis that reasonably reflects the
selling prices that might be expected to be achieved in stand-alone transactions. For additional information about our
revenue recognition, refer to Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we recognized revenue of $8.3 million and $9.6 million,
respectively, related to our agreement with EA Pharma. We expect that any future revenue recognized under our license
agreement with EA Pharma will fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year as a result of royalties for the period
from EA Pharma, as well as the uncertain timing of future milestone payments, if any.
Operating Expenses
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs (including salaries, benefits and stock-
based compensation) for employees in research and development functions, costs associated with nonclinical and clinical
development services, including clinical trials and related manufacturing costs, third-party contract research
89
organizations, or CROs, and related services and other outside costs, including fees for third-party professional services
such as consultants. Our nonclinical studies and clinical studies are performed by CROs. We expect to continue to focus
our research and development efforts on nonclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates. As a result, we
expect our research and development expenses to continue to increase for the foreseeable future.
Our direct research and development expenses are tracked on a program-by-program basis and consist primarily of
external costs such as fees paid to CROs and others in connection with our nonclinical and clinical development
activities and related manufacturing. We do not allocate employee costs or facility expenses, including depreciation or
other indirect costs, to specific product development programs because these costs are deployed across multiple product
development programs and, as such, are not separately classified.
Successful development of our current and potential future product candidates is highly uncertain. Completion
dates and costs for our programs can vary significantly by product candidate and are difficult to predict. As a result, we
cannot estimate with any degree of certainty the costs we will incur in connection with development of any of our
product candidates. We anticipate we will make determinations as to which programs and product candidates to pursue
and how much funding to direct to each program and product candidate on an ongoing basis in response to the results of
ongoing and future clinical trials, our ability to enter into licensing, collaboration and similar arrangements with respect
to current or potential future product candidates, the success of research and development programs and our assessments
of commercial potential.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs (including salaries, benefits and stock-
based compensation) for our executive, finance and other administrative employees. In addition, general and
administrative expenses include fees for third-party professional services, including consulting, information technology,
legal and accounting services and other corporate expenses and allocated overhead.
Other Operating (Income), Expense
Other operating (income), expense consists primarily of foreign currency exchange gains or losses associated with
revaluation of intercompany loans.
Interest Expense, net
Interest expense, net consists primarily of non-cash interest expense recorded in connection with the sale of future
royalties, related to sales of elobixibat in Japan in addition to interest expense associated with our note payable. In
addition, interest expense, net includes interest income associated with our interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base our estimates and assumptions on
historical experience and on various assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, and we
evaluate them on an ongoing basis. These estimates and assumptions form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities and the recording of revenues and expenses that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results and experiences may differ materially from these estimates and judgments. In addition, our
reported financial condition and results of operations could vary if new accounting standards are enacted that are
applicable to our business.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2020 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe that our accounting policies relating
to revenue recognition, research and development expenses and accounting for the liability related to sale of future
90
royalties are the most critical to understanding and evaluating our reported financial results. We have identified these
policies as critical because they both are important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations
and require us to make judgments and estimates on matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in future
periods. For more information regarding these policies, you should refer to Note 1 of our audited consolidated financial
statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Revenue Recognition
We generate revenue primarily from the receipt of upfront or license fees, milestone payments, royalties, and
payments for pharmaceutical ingredient or related procurement services that are made pursuant to license agreements or
related supply agreements. Substantially all of our revenue to date has been derived from our license agreement with EA
Pharma and a now-terminated license agreement with Ferring International Center S.A., or Ferring.
We enter into licensing agreements which are within the scope of ASC 606, under which we may exclusively
license rights to research, develop, manufacture and commercialize our product candidates to third parties. The terms of
these arrangements may include payment to us of one or more of the following: non-refundable, upfront license fees;
reimbursement of certain costs; development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments; and royalties on net sales
of licensed products.
In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as we fulfill our obligations under each of our
agreements, we perform the following steps: (i) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract;
(ii) determination of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations, including whether they are
distinct in the context of the contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable
consideration; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition of revenue
when (or as) we satisfy each performance obligation. As part of the accounting for these arrangements, we must use
significant judgment to determine: (a) the number of performance obligations based on the determination under step
(ii) above and (b) the transaction price under step (iii) above. We use our judgment to determine whether milestones or
other variable consideration, except for royalties, should be included in the transaction price as described further below.
The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative stand-alone selling price basis, for which
we recognize revenue as or when the performance obligations under the contract are satisfied.
Amounts received prior to revenue recognition are recorded as deferred revenue.
Milestone Payments
At the inception of each arrangement that includes development milestone payments, the Company evaluates
whether the milestones are considered probable of being achieved and estimates the amount to be included in the
transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not
occur, the associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the
control of the Company or the licensee, such as regulatory approvals, are not considered probable of being achieved until
those approvals are received. The Company evaluates factors such as the scientific, clinical, regulatory, commercial, and
other risks that must be overcome to achieve the particular milestone in making this assessment. There is considerable
judgment involved in determining whether it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur. At the end
of each subsequent reporting period, the Company reevaluates the probability of achievement of all milestones subject to
constraint and, if necessary, adjusts its estimate of the overall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a
cumulative catch-up basis, which would affect revenues and earnings in the period of adjustment.
Royalties
For arrangements that include sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on a level of sales, and
the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, the Company recognizes revenue at the
later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has
been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).
91
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs (including salaries, benefits and stock-
based compensation) for employees in research and development functions, costs associated with nonclinical and clinical
development services, including clinical trials and related manufacturing costs, third-party contract research
organizations, or CROs, and related services and other outside costs, including fees for third-party professional services
such as consultants. Our nonclinical studies and clinical studies are performed by CROs. We expect to continue to focus
our research and development efforts on nonclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates. As a result, we
expect our research and development expenses to continue to increase for the foreseeable future.
Our direct research and development expenses are tracked on a program-by-program basis and consist primarily of
external costs such as fees paid to CROs and others in connection with our nonclinical and clinical development
activities and related manufacturing. We do not allocate employee costs or facility expenses, including depreciation or
other indirect costs, to specific product development programs because these costs are deployed across multiple product
development programs and, as such, are not separately classified.
Successful development of our current and potential future product candidates is highly uncertain. Completion
dates and costs for our programs can vary significantly by product candidate and are difficult to predict. As a result, we
cannot estimate with any degree of certainty the costs we will incur in connection with development of any of our
product candidates. We anticipate we will make determinations as to which programs and product candidates to pursue
and how much funding to direct to each program and product candidate on an ongoing basis in response to the results of
ongoing and future clinical trials, our ability to enter into licensing, collaboration and similar arrangements with respect
to current or potential future product candidates, the success of research and development programs and our assessments
of commercial potential.
Monetization of Future Royalties
In December 2017, we entered into a royalty interest acquisition agreement (RIAA) with HealthCare Royalty
Partners III, L.P. (HCR) pursuant to which it sold to HCR the right to receive all royalties from sales in Japan and sales
milestones achieved from any covered territory potentially payable to us under the Agreement, up to a specified
maximum “cap” amount of $78.8 million, based on the funds we received from HCR. In January 2018, we received
$44.5 million from HCR, net of certain transaction expenses, under the RIAA. On June 8, 2020, the parties entered into
an amendment to the RIAA pursuant to which HCR agreed to pay us an additional $14.8 million, net of certain
transactions expenses, in exchange for the elimination of the (i) $78.8 million cap amount on HCR’s rights to receive
royalties on sales in Japan and sales milestones for elobixibat in certain other territories that may become payable by EA
Pharma and (ii) the $15.0 million payable to us if a specified sales milestone is achieved for elobixibat in Japan. We are
obligated to make royalty interest payments to HCR under the RIAA only to the extent it receives future Japanese
royalties, sales milestones or other specified payments from EA Pharma. Although we sold our rights to receive royalties
from the sales of elobixibat in Japan, as a result of its ongoing involvement in the cash flows related to these royalties,
we will continue to account for these royalties as revenue. Upon receipt of the payments from HCR we recorded net cash
totaling $59.3 million as a liability related to sale of future royalties (royalty obligation). The royalty obligation will be
amortized using the effective interest rate method.
We record estimated royalties due for the current period in accrued other expenses until the payment is received
from EA Pharma at which time we then remit payment to HCR. In order to determine the accretion of the royalty
obligation, we are required to estimate the total amount of future royalty payments to be received and submitted to HCR.
The sum of these amounts less the $59.3 million proceeds we received will be recorded as interest expense over the life
of the royalty obligation. At December 31, 2020, our estimate of total interest expense resulted in an annual effective
interest rate of approximately 19.0%.
We periodically assess the estimated royalty payments to HCR and to the extent such payments are greater or less
than our initial estimates or the timing of such payments is materially different than its original estimates, we will
prospectively adjust the accretion of interest on the royalty obligation. There are a number of factors that could
materially affect the amount and the timing of royalty payments, most of which are not within our control. Such factors
92
include, but are not limited to, the rate of elobixibat prescriptions, the number of doses administered, the introduction of
competing products, manufacturing or other delays, patent protection, adverse events that result in governmental health
authority imposed restrictions on the use of the drug products, significant changes in foreign exchange rates as the
royalties remitted to HCR are in U.S. dollars while sales of elobixibat are in Japanese yen, and sales never achieving
forecasted numbers, which would result in reduced royalty payments and reduced non-cash interest expense over the life
of the royalty obligation. To the extent future royalties result in an amount less than the liability, we are not obligated to
fund any such shortfall.
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019
Result of Operations
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Operating Expenses
Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other operating (income) expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Revenue
Year Ended
December 31,
2020
2019
(in thousands)
Change
$
8,308 $
9,636 $
(1,328)
76,777
42,448
(14,646)
104,579
(96,271)
(11,362)
-
(107,633) $
45,575
22,963
2,210
70,748
(61,112)
(5,296)
3,691
(62,717) $
31,202
19,485
(16,856)
33,831
(35,159)
(6,066)
(3,691)
(44,916)
Year Ended
December 31,
Change
2020
2019
(in thousands)
$
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
8,308 $
9,636 $
(1,328)
Revenue was $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared with revenue of $9.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $1.3 million. The decrease in revenue primarily relates to a sales-based
milestone achieved in 2019 offset by higher sales-based royalties earned in 2020.
Research and development expenses
Research and development expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
76,777 $
45,575 $
31,202
Research and development expenses were $76.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared with
$45.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $31.2 million. The higher research and development
expenses for the 2020 period were principally due to personnel expenses as we continue to increase our headcount and
program activities. The increase in program activities related primarily to odevixibat for regulatory submissions in PFIC,
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2019
(in thousands)
Change
$
93
the initiation of clinical trials for additional indications for biliary atresia and Alagille syndrome, and preclinical
programs.
The following table summarizes our principal product development programs and the out-of-pocket third-party
expenses incurred with respect to each clinical-stage product candidate and our preclinical programs for the years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2019
Change
$
(in thousands)
Direct third-party project costs:
Odevixibat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Elobixibat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A3384 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preclinical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
42,799 $ 19,605 $ 23,194
(1,827)
4,753
2,926
93
(425)
518
1,286
4,049
5,335
51,153 $ 28,925 $ 22,228
Other project costs(1):
Personnel costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Other costs(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Total research and development costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
22,933 $ 11,484 $ 11,449
(2,475)
5,166
2,691
25,624 $ 16,650 $
8,974
76,777 $ 45,575 $ 31,202
(1) Other project costs are leveraged across multiple programs.
(2) Other costs include facility, supply, consultant and overhead costs that support multiple programs.
General and administrative expenses
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2019
(in thousands)
Change
$
General and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 42,448 $ 22,963 $ 19,485
General and administrative expenses were $42.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared with
$23.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $19.5 million. The increase is attributable to
personnel and related expenses as we continue to increase our headcount, and commercialization readiness activity.
Other operating (income) expense, net
Other operating (income) expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (14,646) $ 2,210 $ (16,856)
Other operating (income) expense, net totaled $14.6 million of income for the year ended December 31, 2020
compared with $2.2 million of expense for the year ended December 31, 2019, a difference of $16.9 million. The
difference primarily relates to changes in foreign currency exchange rates in the two periods.
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2019
(in thousands)
Change
$
94
Interest expense, net
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2019
(in thousands)
Change
$
Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (11,362) $ (5,296) $ (6,066)
Interest expense, net totaled $11.4 million of expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared with $5.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2019, a difference of $6.1 million. The difference was principally attributable
to higher non-cash interest expense recorded in connection with the sale of future royalties, related to sales of elobixibat
in Japan in addition to interest expense associated with our note payable offset by interest income associated with our
interest-bearing cash and cash equivalents.
Other non-operating income
Other non-operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
— $ 3,691 $ (3,691)
Other non-operating income was $0.0 million of income for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared with
$3.7 million of income for the year ended December 31, 2019, a difference of $3.7 million. The difference is primarily
related to the proceeds from a legal settlement in 2019.
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2019
(in thousands)
Change
$
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
We do not expect to generate significant revenue from product sales unless and until we or a potential future
licensee or collaborator obtains marketing approval for, and commercializes, one or more of our current or potential
future product candidates (other than elobixibat as a treatment for chronic constipation in Japan), which we do not expect
to occur until at least the second half of 2021, if at all. We anticipate that we will continue to generate losses for the
foreseeable future, and we expect the losses to increase as we continue the development of and seek regulatory approvals
for our product candidates. We are subject to all of the risks applicable to the development of new pharmaceutical
products and may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may
harm our business. We expect that we will need substantial additional funding to complete development of and
potentially commercialize our product candidates.
Our operations have historically been financed primarily through issuances of equity or convertible debt, upfront
fees paid upon entering into license agreements, payments received upon the achievement of specified milestone events
under license agreements, grants and venture debt borrowings and the HCR royalty monetization transactions. Our
primary uses of capital are, and we expect will continue to be, personnel-related costs, third party expenses associated
with our research and development programs, including the conduct of clinical trials, and manufacturing-related costs for
our product candidates.
As of December 31, 2020, our cash and cash equivalents were approximately $251.3 million.
During the first quarter of 2018, following the Japanese MHLW’s approval of elobixibat for the treatment of
chronic constipation in January 2018, we received a $44.5 million payment, net of certain transaction expenses, from
HCR under our RIAA. Additionally, this approval triggered a milestone payment to us from EA Pharma of $11.2
million. In June 2020, we entered into an amendment to the RIAA with HCR pursuant to which HCR agreed to pay us
an additional $14.8 million, net of certain transaction expenses in exchange for the elimination of the (i) $78.8 million
cap amount on HCR’s rights to receive royalties on sales in Japan and sales milestones for elobixibat in certain other
95
territories that may become payable by EA Pharma and (ii) $15.0 million payable to us if a specified sales milestone is
achieved for elobixibat in Japan. As of December 31, 2020, we have received approximately $49.9 million in upfront
and milestone payments from EA Pharma under a license agreement for the development and commercialization of
elobixibat in specified countries in Asia. We are eligible to receive additional amounts of up to $5.3 million under the
amended agreement, if a specified regulatory event is achieved for elobixibat. Pursuant to the RIAA, any additional
royalties and sales milestone payments that we receive from EA Pharma will be payable by us to HCR under the RIAA.
In March 2019, we entered into a sales agreement with Cowen and Company, LLC, or Cowen, with respect to an
at-the-market offering program for us to offer and sell, from time to time at our sole discretion, shares of our common
stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million. Subsequently, in May 2019, we sold 637,367 shares of
our common stock for net proceeds of approximately $20.8 million pursuant to the sales agreement. This agreement
terminated on May 7, 2020.
In addition, in February 2020, we completed an underwritten public offering of 2,190,750 shares of our common
stock under our universal shelf registration statement for net proceeds of approximately $43.0 million.
On May 7, 2020, we filed a new universal shelf registration on Form S-3, or the 2020 Form S-3, with the SEC,
which was declared effective on May 18, 2020, pursuant to which we registered for sale up to $200.0 million of any
combination of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, rights and/or units from time to time and at
prices and on terms that we may determine. On May 7, 2020, we also entered into a new sales agreement, with respect to
an at-the-market offering program under which we may offer and sell, from time to time at our sole discretion, shares of
our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million. This agreement terminated on September 9,
2020.
On September 14, 2020, we completed an underwritten public offering of 4,000,000 shares of our common stock
under this registration statement. We received net proceeds from this offering of approximately $150.4 million, after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions, but before deducting offering expenses. As of December 31, 2020,
$40.0 million of securities remain available for issuance under the 2020 Form S-3.
On June 8, 2020, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with the several banks and other financial
institutions or entities from time to time parties to the Loan and Security Agreement, as lenders, or collectively referred
to as the Lender, and Hercules Capital, Inc., in its capacity as administrative agent and collateral agent for itself and
Lender (in such capacity, the Agent or Hercules). The Loan and Security Agreement provides for term loans in an
aggregate principal amount of up to $80.0 million to be delivered in multiple tranches, (the Term Loans). The tranches
consist of (i) a term loan advance to Borrower in an aggregate principal amount of up to $15.0 million, of which (A) we
agreed to borrow an aggregate principal amount of $10.0 million on the date on which all conditions to the funding of
the Term Loans by the Lender were met (the Closing Date), but we did not request that the Lender make an additional
term loan advance to us in an aggregate principal amount of $5.0 million prior to December 15, 2020 as permitted under
the agreement, (ii) subject to the achievement of certain initial performance milestones, or Performance Milestone I, we
have the right to request that the Lender make additional term loan advances to us in an aggregate principal amount of up
to $20.0 million from January 1, 2021 through December 15, 2021 in minimum increments of $10.0 million, and
(iii) subject to the Lender’s investment committee’s sole discretion, we have the right to request that the Lender make
additional term loan advances to us in an aggregate principal amount of up to $45.0 million through March 31, 2022 in
minimum increments of $5.0 million. As of December 31, 2020, we borrowed an aggregate principal amount of $10.0
million and an aggregate principal amount of up to $65.0 million remains available for future borrowings.
Under the Loan and Security Agreement, we also agreed to issue to Hercules warrants to purchase a number of
shares of our common stock equal to 1% of the aggregate amount of the Term Loans that are funded, as such amounts
are funded. On the Closing Date, we issued a warrant for 5,311 shares of our common stock. The warrants will be
exercisable for a period of seven years from the date of the issuance of each warrant at a per-share exercise price equal to
$18.83, subject to certain adjustments as specified in the warrants. The shares of common stock underlying the warrants
were subsequently registered on Form S-3 with the SEC, which was declared effective on August 18, 2020.
96
On or about February 25, 2021, we expect to file a new universal shelf registration on Form S-3 with the SEC,
pursuant to which we expect to register for sale up to 400million of any combination of our common stock, preferred
stock, debt securities, warrants, rights and/or units from time to time and at prices and on terms that we may determine,
which we refer to as the 2021 Form S-3. On or about February 25, 2021, we intend to enter into a new sales agreement,
which we refer to as the 2021 Sales Agreement, with respect to an at-the-market offering program under which we may
offer and sell, from time to time at our sole discretion, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of
up to $100 million. Our issuance and sale, if any, of shares under the 2021 Sales Agreement is subject to the
effectiveness of the 2021 Form S-3. We make no assurances as to if or when the 2021 Form S-3 will become effective
or, if it does become effective, as to the continued effectiveness of the 2021 Form S-3. No additional securities registered
under the 2020 Form S-3 will be offered or sold after date of effectiveness of the 2021 Form S-3. This report shall not
constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any shares under the 2021 Sales Agreement that we intend
to enter into or any securities under the 2021 Form S-3 that we intend to file with the SEC, nor shall there be any sale of
such securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or
qualification under the securities laws of any such state.
Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019
December 31,
2020
2019
(in thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by:
Operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (101,029)
Investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(78)
Financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
220,276
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 119,169
260
(52,919)
(540)
23,504
(29,955)
(2,087)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 119,429 $ (32,042)
Operating activities
Cash used in operating activities of $101.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily a result of
our $107.6 million net loss from operations and a net decrease in assets and liabilities of $4.7 million. The net decrease
in operating assets and liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily driven by decreases in prepaid
expenses and other current assets, decreases in accrued expenses, as well as decreases in other current and long-term
liabilities. This decrease was offset by non cash items, including $14.6 million of stock-based compensation expense,
$14.6 million of foreign currency adjustments, and $10.8 million of accretion of liability related to sale of future
royalties. Cash used in operating activities of $52.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily a result
of our $62.7 million net loss from operations and a net decrease in assets and liabilities of $10.3 million. The net
decrease in operating assets and liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily driven by a decrease in
accrued expenses and an increase to prepaid expenses and other current asset, and accounts payable. This decrease was
offset by non cash items, including $8.4 million of accretion of liability related to sale of future royalties, $7.6 million of
stock-based compensation expense, and $4.0 million of foreign currency adjustments.
Investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $0.1 million compared to $0.5
million for 2019. The change was primarily due to higher purchases of property and equipment in 2019.
Financing activities
Cash provided by financing activities of $220.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily
related to proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs of $193.3 million, proceeds from the HCR
97
royalty agreement of $14.8 million, proceeds from the issuance of debt, net of issuance costs of $9.5 million, and
proceeds from exercise of options of $2.8 million. Cash provided by financing activities of $23.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2019 was primarily related to proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs of
$20.8 million and proceeds from exercise of options of $2.7 million.
Funding Requirements
Cash used to fund operating expenses is affected by the timing of when we pay expenses, as reflected in the
change in our outstanding accounts payable and accrued expenses. We believe that our existing cash and cash
equivalents will be sufficient to meet our projected operating requirements into 2023 including for the commercial
launch of odevixibat, if approved, for our open-label trial in PFIC for odevixibat, in addition to Phase 3 clinical
programs for odevixibat in biliary atresia and Alagille syndrome, as well as A3907, A2342 and our preclinical programs.
We anticipate an operating cash burn rate in the range of $120.0 to $130.0 million in 2021. However, our operating plans
may change as a result of many factors, including those described below, and we may need additional funds sooner than
planned to meet operational needs and capital requirements. In addition, if the conditions for raising capital are favorable
we may seek to raise additional funds at any time.
Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
any unfavorable development or delay in our odevixibat program in PFIC, including the review or approval
of our odevixibat marketing applications in the United States and Europe for PFIC and the costs and timing
of our pre-commercialization preparations;
the costs, design, duration and any potential delays of the pivotal clinical trial of odevixibat in biliary atresia
and the pivotal clinical trial of odevixibat in ALGS;
the scope, number, progress, initiation, duration, cost, results and timing of clinical trials and nonclinical
studies of our current or future product candidates;
whether and to what extent milestone events are achieved under our license agreement with EA Pharma or
any potential future licensee or collaborator;
the outcomes and timing of regulatory reviews, approvals or other actions;
our ability to obtain marketing approval for our product candidates;
our ability to establish and maintain additional licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements on favorable
terms and whether and to what extent we retain development or commercialization responsibilities under any
new licensing, collaboration or similar arrangement;
the success of any other business, product or technology that we acquire or in which we invest;
our ability to maintain, expand and defend the scope of our intellectual property portfolio;
our ability to manufacture any approved products on commercially reasonable terms;
our ability to establish a sales and marketing organization or suitable third-party alternatives for any
approved product;
the number and characteristics of product candidates and programs that we pursue;
current and potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business;
98
•
•
•
•
•
the costs of acquiring, licensing or investing in businesses, product candidates and technologies;
our need and ability to hire additional management and scientific and medical personnel;
the costs to operate as a public company in the United States, including the need to implement additional
financial and reporting systems and other internal systems and infrastructure for our business;
market acceptance of our product candidates, to the extent any are approved for commercial sale; and
the effect of competing technological and market developments.
We cannot determine precisely the dates of potential regulatory approval of odevixibat in PFIC or the dates of our
potential commercial launch, or the completion dates and related costs of our development programs due to inherent
uncertainties in outcomes of clinical trials and the regulatory approval process. We cannot be certain that we will be able
to successfully complete our pre-commercialization activities or research and development programs or establish
licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements for our product candidates. Our failure or the failure of any current or
potential future licensee to complete research and development programs for our product candidates could have a
material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
We expect to continue to incur losses. Our ability to achieve and maintain profitability is dependent upon the
successful development, regulatory approval and commercialization of our product candidates and achieving a level of
revenues adequate to support our cost structure. We may never achieve profitability.
If the conditions for raising capital are favorable, we may seek to finance future cash needs through public or
private equity or debt offerings or other financings. Additionally, if we need to raise additional capital to fund our
operations, complete clinical trials, or potentially commercialize our product candidates, we may likewise seek to
finance future cash needs through public or private equity or debt offerings or other financings. The necessary funding
may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.
We have an effective universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC, pursuant to which we
registered for sale up to $200 million of any combination of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities,
warrants, rights and/or units from time to time and at prices and on terms that we may determine. As of December 31,
2020, $40.0 million of securities remain available for issuance under the shelf registration statement, which we refer to
as the 2020 Form S-3. On or about February 25, 2021, we expect to file a new universal shelf registration on Form S-3
with the SEC, pursuant to which we expect to register for sale up to $400million of any combination of our common
stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, rights and/or units from time to time and at prices and on terms that we
may determine, which we refer to as the 2021 Form S-3, including up to $100 million of our common stock pursuant to
the new sales agreement with respect to an at-the-market offering program. We make no assurances as to if or when the
2021 Form S-3 will become effective or, if it does become effective, as to the continued effectiveness of the 2021
Form S-3. No additional securities registered under the 2020 Form S-3 will be offered or sold after the date of
effectiveness of the 2021 Form S-3. This report shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy
any shares under the 2021 Sales Agreement that we intend to enter into or any securities under the 2021 Form S-3 that
we intend to file with the SEC, nor shall there be any sale of such securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation
or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state.
The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities may result in significant dilution to our stockholders,
and the terms may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of our stockholders. In
addition, following the closing of our September 2020 public offering of common stock, we have a limited number of
authorized shares of common stock available for future issuance that are not already issued or reserved for issuance. The
incurrence of additional debt financing would result in debt service obligations and the instruments governing such debt
may provide for operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations. We may also seek to finance
future cash needs through potential future licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements. These arrangements may not
be available on acceptable terms or at all, and we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future
revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us.
99
If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate our development
programs or obtain funds through third-party arrangements that may require us to relinquish rights to certain product
candidates that we might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize independently.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
100
Item 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ALBIREO PHARMA, INC.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 . . .
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 . . .
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number
F-1
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-7
F-8
101
Item 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including
our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based on
that evaluation, our management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of December 31, 2020 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us
in the reports filed or submitted by us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Such disclosure controls and procedures include controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial
reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company’s management and
directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use
or disposition of assets of the Company that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision, and with the participation, of our management, including the CEO and CFO, we conducted
an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment,
management, including our CEO and CFO, has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective
as of December 31, 2020.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation
of such internal control that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2020, that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
102
Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The response to this item is incorporated by reference from the discussion responsive thereto under the captions
“Management and Corporate Governance” and “Corporate Code of Conduct and Ethics” in our proxy statement for the
2021 annual meeting of stockholders.
Item 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The response to this item is incorporated by reference from the discussion responsive thereto under the caption
“Executive Officer and Director Compensation” in our proxy statement for the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.
Item 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The response to this item is incorporated by reference from the discussion responsive thereto under the captions
“Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in
our proxy statement for the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.
Item 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The response to this item is incorporated by reference from the discussion responsive thereto under the captions
“Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” and “Management and Corporate Governance” in our proxy
statement for the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.
Item 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The response to this item is incorporated by reference from the discussion responsive thereto under the caption
“Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our proxy statement for the 2021
annual meeting of stockholders.
103
PART IV
Item 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Item 15(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Item 15(a)(1) and (2) See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules” at Item 8
to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other financial statement schedules have not been
included because they are not applicable or the information is included in the financial
statements or notes thereto.
Item 15(a)(3) Exhibits
The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
2.1
Amended and Restated Share
Exchange Agreement, dated as of
July 13, 2016, by and among the
Registrant (formerly Biodel Inc.),
Albireo Limited and the Sellers
listed on Schedule I thereto.
3.1
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, as amended, of the
Registrant.
3.2
Amended and Restated Bylaws of
the Registrant.
4.1
Form of common stock certificate.
4.2
Description of the Registrant’s
Securities.
4.3
Form of Warrant issued by the
Registrant to Hercules Capital, Inc.
10.1*
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, dated as
of March 6, 2019, by and between
the Registrant and Ronald H.W.
Cooper.
10.2*
Employment Agreement, dated as
of October 4, 2018, by and
between the Registrant and Simon
N. R. Harford.
Incorporated by
Reference
herein from
Form or Schedule
Filed
Herewith
Filing Date
SEC File/
Reg.
Number
8-K
(Exhibit 2.1)
7/13/2016
001-33451
S-3
(Exhibit 4.1.1)
S-8
(Exhibit 4.2)
10-K
(Exhibit 4.1)
10-K
(Exhibit 4.2)
8-K
(Exhibit 10.2)
10-K
(Exhibit 10.1)
10/13/2017
333-220958
7/6/2007
333-144407
12/22/2016
001-33451
3/2/2020
001-33451
6/9/2020
001-33451
3/6/2019
001-33451
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.3)
11/8/2018
001-33451
104
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
10.3*
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, dated as
of March 6, 2019, by and between
Albireo AB and Jan P. Mattsson,
Ph.D.
10.4*
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, dated as
of March 6, 2019, by and between
the Registrant and Martha J.
Carter.
10.5*
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, dated as
of March 6, 2019, by and between
the Registrant and Patrick Horn.
10.6*
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, dated as
of March 6, 2019, by and between
the Registrant and Jason G.
Duncan.
10.7*
Employment Agreement, dated as
of March 25, 2019, by and between
the Registrant and Pamela
Stephenson.
10.8*
Employment Agreement, dated as
of October 31, 2019, by and
between the Registrant and
Michelle Graham.
10.9*
Albireo Pharma, Inc. 2018 Equity
Incentive Plan, as amended.
10.10* Form of Stock Option Agreement
under the Albireo Pharma, Inc.
2018 Equity Incentive Plan.
10.11* Form of Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement under the Albireo
Pharma, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive
Plan.
10.12* Albireo Pharma, Inc. 2018
Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Incorporated by
Reference
herein from
Form or Schedule
Filed
Herewith
Filing Date
SEC File/
Reg.
Number
10-K
(Exhibit 10.3)
10-K
(Exhibit 10.4)
3/6/2019
001-33451
3/6/2019
001-33451
10-K
(Exhibit 10.5)
3/6/2019
001-33451
10-K
(Exhibit 10.6)
3/6/2019
001-33451
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.1)
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.1)
8-K
(Exhibit 10.1)
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.2)
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.5)
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.3)
5/9/2019
001-33451
11/6/2019
001-33451
6/18/2019
001-33451
8/9/2018
001-33451
8/9/2018
001-33451
8/9/2018
001-33451
105
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
10.13* Inducement Stock Option
Agreement, dated as of October 10,
2018, by and between the
Registrant and Simon N.R.
Harford.
10.14* Inducement Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement, dated as of October 10,
2018, by and between the
Registrant and Simon N.R.
Harford.
Incorporated by
Reference
herein from
Form or Schedule
Filed
Herewith
Filing Date
SEC File/
Reg.
Number
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.5)
11/8/2018
001-33451
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.6)
11/8/2018
001-33451
10.15* Albireo Pharma, Inc. 2017
Inducement Equity Incentive Plan.
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.1)
11/14/2017
001-33451
10.16* Form of Stock Option Agreement
under the Albireo Pharma, Inc.
2017 Inducement Equity Incentive
Plan.
10.17* Albireo Pharma, Inc. 2016 Equity
Incentive Plan.
10.18* Form of Stock Option Agreement
under the Albireo Pharma, Inc.
2016 Equity Incentive Plan.
10.19* Replacement Stock Options
granted to Ronald H.W. Cooper in
connection with the closing of the
Biodel Transaction.
10.20* 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended.
10.21* 2010 Incentive Stock Option
Agreement.
10.22* 2010 Non Statutory Stock Option
Agreement.
10.23* 2010 Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement.
10.24* Amended and Restated 2004 Stock
Incentive Plan.
10-K
(Exhibit 10.11)
8-K
(Exhibit 10.9)
10-K
(Exhibit 10.13)
10-K
(Exhibit 10.14)
Schedule 14A
(Exhibit A)
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.2)
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.3)
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.4)
S-1/A
(Exhibit 10.3)
3/27/18
001-33451
11/4/2016
001-33451
12/22/2016
001-33451
12/22/2016
001-33451
1/26/2012
001-33451
5/7/2010
001-33451
5/7/2010
001-33451
5/7/2010
001-33451
3/27/2007
333-140504
106
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
10.25* Form of Incentive Stock Option
Agreement for 2004 Amended and
Restated Stock Incentive Plan.
10.26* 2005 Non-Employee Directors’
Stock Option Plan.
10.27* Form of Option Agreement for
2005 Non-Employee Directors’
Stock Option Plan.
10.28* Form of Indemnification
Agreement, by and between the
Registrant and each of its directors
and executive officers.
10.29* Nonemployee Director
Compensation Policy.
10.30
Asset Purchase and License
Agreement, dated as of
September 2, 2016, by and among
Unilife Corporation, Unilife
Medical Solution, Inc. and
Biodel Inc.
10.30.1** License Agreement, dated as of
April 2, 2012, by and between
Elobix AB, as assignee of Albireo
AB, and EA Pharma Co., Ltd.
(formerly known as Ajinomoto
Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.).
10.30.2** First Amendment to the License
Agreement, dated as of January 30,
2015, by and between Elobix AB,
as assignee of Albireo AB, and EA
Pharma Co., Ltd. (formerly known
as Ajinomoto Pharmaceuticals
Co., Ltd.).
10.30.3** Second Amendment to the License
Agreement, dated as of April 6,
2016, by and between Elobix AB
and EA Pharma Co., Ltd. (formerly
known as Ajinomoto
Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.).
Incorporated by
Reference
herein from
Form or Schedule
Filed
Herewith
Filing Date
SEC File/
Reg.
Number
10-K
(Exhibit 10.19)
S-1/A
(Exhibit 10.5)
10-K
(Exhibit 10.20)
8-K
(Exhibit 10.8)
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.1)
12/21/2007
001-33451
3/27/2007
333-140504
12/21/2007
001-33451
11/4/2016
001-33451
5/7/2020
001-33451
8-K
(Exhibit 10.1)
9/9/2016
001-33451
10-K
(Exhibit 10.28.1)
3/27/2017
001-33451
10-K
(Exhibit 10.28.2)
3/27/2017
001-33451
10-K
(Exhibit 10.28.3)
3/27/2017
001-33451
107
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
10.30.4** Third Amendment to the License
Agreement, dated as of
December 7, 2017, by and between
Elobix AB and EA Pharma
Co., Ltd. (formerly known as
Ajinomoto Pharmaceuticals
Co., Ltd.).
10.31.1** Royalty Interest Acquisition
Agreement, dated as of
December 28, 2017, by and among
Elobix AB, HealthCare Royalty
Partners III, L.P. and, solely for the
purposes specified therein, the
Registrant.
10.31.2** * Amendment to Royalty Interest
Acquisition Agreement, dated as of
June 8, 2020, by and among Elobix
AB, HealthCare Royalty Partners
III, L.P. and, solely for the
purposes specified therein, the
Registrant.
10.32.1 Office Lease Agreement, dated as
of February 7, 2017, by and
between the Registrant and SHIGO
10 PO Owner LLC.
10.32.2 Amendment No. 1 to Office Lease
Agreement, dated as of March 28,
2019, by and between the
Registrant and POSIG Investors,
LLC.
10.32.3 Amendment No. 2 to Office Lease
Agreement, dated as of May 4,
2020, by and between NS Boston
III PO Owner LLC and the
Registrant.
Incorporated by
Reference
herein from
Form or Schedule
Filed
Herewith
Filing Date
SEC File/
Reg.
Number
10-K
(Exhibit 10.27.4)
3/27/2018
001-33451
10-K
(Exhibit 10.28)
3/27/2018
001-33451
8-K
(Exhibit 10.3)
6/9/2020
001-33451
8-K
(Exhibit 10.1)
2/10/2017
001-33451
8-K
(Exhibit 10.1)
4/3/2019
001-33451
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.2)
5/7/2020
001-33451
108
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
10.33
Loan and Security Agreement,
dated as of June 8, 2020, by and
among the Registrant, Albireo AB,
and Hercules Capital, Inc.
Incorporated by
Reference
herein from
Form or Schedule
Filed
Herewith
Filing Date
SEC File/
Reg.
Number
8-K
(Exhibit 10.1)
6/9/2020
001-33451
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.1)
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.2)
10-Q
(Exhibit 10.3)
11/5/2020
001-33451
11/5/2020
001-33451
11/5/2020
001-33451
10.34* Albireo Pharma, Inc. 2020
Inducement Equity Incentive Plan.
10.35* Form of Stock Option Agreement
under the Albireo Pharma, Inc.
2020 Inducement Equity Incentive
Plan.
10.36* Form of Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement under the 2020
Inducement Equity Incentive Plan.
14.1
Albireo Pharma, Inc. Corporate
Code of Conduct and Ethics and
Whistleblower Policy.
21.1
Subsidiaries.
23.1
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
31.1
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer.
31.2
Certification of the Chief Financial
Officer.
32.1
Certification pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
101
Inline XBRL Instance Document
(the instance document does not
appear in the Interactive Data File
because its XBRL tags are
embedded within the Inline XBRL
document).
SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Schema Document.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
109
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Calculation Linkbase Document.
DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Definition.
LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Label Linkbase Document.
104
PRE XBRL Taxonomy
Presentation Linkbase Document.
Cover Page Interactive Date File
(formatted as Inline XBRL and
contained in Exhibit 101).
Incorporated by
Reference
herein from
Form or Schedule
Filed
Herewith
Filing Date
SEC File/
Reg.
Number
X
X
X
X
X
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
** Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain portions of this Exhibit, which portions have been
omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an application for confidential
treatment pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
*** Certain confidential portions of this Exhibit were omitted by means of marking such portions with brackets
(“[***]”) because the identified confidential portions (i) are not material and (ii) would be competitively harmful if
publicly disclosed.
Item 16.
FORM 10-K SUMMARY.
None.
110
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Date: February 25, 2021
ALBIREO PHARMA, INC.
By: /s/ Ronald H.W. Cooper
Ronald H.W. Cooper
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signatures
Title
/s/ Ronald H.W. Cooper
Ronald H.W. Cooper
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer)
Date
February 25, 2021
February 25, 2021
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer)
/s/ Simon N.R. Harford
Simon N.R. Harford
/s/ David Chiswell, Ph.D.
David Chiswell, Ph.D.
/s/ Anne Klibanski, M.D.
Anne Klibanski, M.D.
/s/ Michael Gutch, Ph.D.
Michael Gutch, Ph.D.
/s/ Roger A. Jeffs, Ph.D.
Roger A. Jeffs, Ph.D.
/s/ Stephanie S. Okey, M.S.
Stephanie S. Okey, M.S.
/s/ Davey S. Scoon
Davey S. Scoon
Chairman of the Board
February 25, 2021
February 25, 2021
February 25, 2021
February 25, 2021
February 25, 2021
February 25, 2021
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
111
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Albireo Pharma, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Albireo Pharma, Inc. (the Company) as of
December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity
and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred
to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement,
whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal
control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements
that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or
disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex
judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated
financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a
separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Accounting for Clinical Trial Expense
Description of the
Matter
As of December 31, 2020, the Company’s accrued clinical trial development costs totaled $4.9
million. Additionally, the Company’s prepaid expenses and other current assets totaled $10.6
million, which includes amounts paid in advance of services being provided by contracted third
parties. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the significant factors used
in estimating clinical trial expenses include the number of patients enrolled, the percentage of work
completed to date and contract milestones achieved. The Company’s estimates are highly dependent
F-1
upon the timeliness and accuracy of the data provided by contracted third parties regarding the
status of their contracted activity.
Auditing the Company’s clinical trial expenses is especially challenging due to the application of
significant management judgment over the estimate of services provided. Specifically, the amount
of accrued and prepaid clinical trial development costs recognized is sensitive to the availability of
information to make the estimates, including the estimate of the period over which services will be
performed, the level of effort expended as of the balance sheet date and the associated cost of such
services. Additionally, due to the long duration of clinical trials and contractual terms for invoicing,
the actual amounts incurred are required to be estimated as of the report date.
To test clinical trial expenses, we performed audit procedures that included, among others,
reviewing material contracts and related amendments for key financial and contractual terms. In
addition, for a sample of transactions, we compared the clinical trial expenses incurred against
related year-to-date invoices and contracts to test that the expense was recognized in the appropriate
period and that amounts were properly accrued or capitalized depending upon the timing of
payments. We also evaluated management’s estimates of progress for a sample of clinical trials and
manufacturing efforts by making direct inquiries of the Company’s research and development
personnel who oversee the clinical trials. Further, we confirmed with contracted third parties the
costs incurred to date, the terms and conditions of the related contract, including any executed
amendments. To evaluate the completeness of the accrued clinical trial development costs we also
examined invoices received from contracted third parties as well as tested material cash
disbursements made subsequent to December 31, 2020.
How We
Addressed the
Matter in Our
Audit
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.
Boston, Massachusetts
February 25, 2021
F-2
Albireo Pharma, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
December 31, December 31,
2020
2019
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 251,272 $ 131,843
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,956
141,799
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
597
Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17,260
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5,413
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 285,607 $ 165,069
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
10,593
261,865
478
17,260
6,004
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liability related to sale of future royalties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Note payable, net of discount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share — 50,000,000
authorized at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019; 0
and 0 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020 and
December 31, 2019, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share — 30,000,000
5,283 $
19,051
948
25,282
65,894
9,621
3,579
104,376
4,785
13,486
653
18,924
48,714
—
4,270
71,908
—
—
authorized at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019;
19,107,040 and 12,749,443 issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
127
245,769
6,452
(159,187)
93,161
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 285,607 $ 165,069
191
456,472
(8,612)
(266,820)
181,231
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
Albireo Pharma, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Operating expenses:
Research and development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other operating (income) expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . $
Weighted-average common shares used to compute basic
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2020
8,308 $
9,636
76,777
42,448
(14,646)
104,579
(96,271)
(11,362)
—
(107,633) $
(6.73) $
45,575
22,963
2,210
70,748
(61,112)
(5,296)
3,691
(62,717)
(5.04)
and diluted net loss per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15,983,058
12,437,742
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
Albireo Pharma, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(in thousands)
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (107,633) $ (62,717)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2019
Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,159
2,159
Total comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (122,697) $ (60,558)
(15,064)
(15,064)
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
Albireo Pharma, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(in thousands, except share amounts)
Common Stock
Shares
Additional
Paid-In
Amount Capital
Comprehensive Accumulated Stockholders’
Income (loss) Deficit
Equity
Total
Accumulated
Other
Balance--December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . 11,969,928 $ 120 $ 214,694 $
Share based compensation expense . . . .
Exercise of options and vesting of
7,578
—
—
RSUs and ESPP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock, net of costs .
Other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance--December 31, 2019 . . . . . . . . . 12,749,443 $ 127 $ 245,769 $
Share based compensation expense . . . .
Exercise of options and vesting of
1
2,728
6 20,769
—
—
142,148
637,367
—
—
— 14,615
—
—
—
RSUs and ESPP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock, net of costs .
Other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance--December 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . .
166,847
6,190,750
—
—
2
2,772
113
62 193,203
—
—
—
—
19,107,040 $ 191 $ 456,472 $
4,293 $ (96,470) $ 122,637
7,578
—
—
—
2,159
—
—
—
—
(62,717)
6,452 $ (159,187) $
—
—
2,729
20,775
2,159
(62,717)
93,161
14,615
—
—
2,774
113
193,265
(15,064)
(107,633)
(8,612) $ (266,820) $ 181,231
—
(107,633)
(15,064)
—
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
Albireo Pharma, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (107,633) $ (62,717)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
Accretion of liability related to sale of future royalties . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion of debt discount and amortization of issuance costs . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
10,778
248
192
14,615
(14,573)
8,360
—
127
7,578
4,006
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current and long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(508)
575
275
(4,774)
(224)
(101,029)
(6,331)
(360)
577
(4,095)
(64)
(52,919)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(78)
(78)
(540)
(540)
Cash flows from financing activities:
20,775
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs . . .
Proceeds from royalty agreement, net of issuance costs . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from exercise of options and vesting of RSUs . . . . . . . . . .
2,729
23,504
Net cash provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2,087)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . .
(32,042)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
163,885
Cash and cash equivalents—end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 251,272 $ 131,843
Supplemental disclosures of cash and non-cash activities:
193,265
14,750
9,487
2,774
220,276
260
119,429
131,843
Warrants issued with long-term debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Cash paid for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Right of use assets and lease obligations recorded upon amended
113 $
— $
—
20
lease agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
— $
4,747
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-7
Albireo Pharma, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Summary of significant accounting policies and basis of presentation
Organization
Albireo Pharma, Inc. (the Company), is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development
and commercialization of novel bile acid modulators to treat orphan pediatric liver diseases and other liver and
gastrointestinal diseases and disorders. The Company’s clinical pipeline includes a Phase 3 product candidate, a Phase 2
product candidate, and elobixibat, which is approved in Japan for the treatment of chronic constipation. Odevixibat, the
Company’s Phase 3 lead product candidate, is in development initially for the treatment of patients with progressive
familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC), a rare, life-threatening genetic disorder affecting young children.
Basis of presentation
These Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States (U.S. GAAP). Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to the
authoritative U.S. GAAP as found in the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) and Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB).
Principles of consolidation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company including its direct or
indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Foreign currency translation
Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements of each entity comprising the Company are measured using the currency
of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the functional currency).
Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions in each entity comprising the Company are remeasured into the functional currency
of the entity using the exchange rates prevailing at the respective transaction dates. Foreign exchange gains and losses
resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the remeasurement at year-end exchange rates of monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized within Other operating (income) expense, net
except for changes in the liability related to the sale of future royalties which are recorded in Other non-operating
(income) expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The results and financial position of the Company’s subsidiaries’ that have a functional currency different from the
USD are translated as follows:
a.
b.
assets and liabilities presented are translated at the closing exchange rate as of December 31, 2020 and 2019;
income and expenses for the statements of operations and comprehensive loss are translated at average
exchange rates that are relevant for the respective periods for which the income and expenses occurred; and
c.
significant transactions use the exchange rate on the date of the transaction;
F-8
All resulting exchange differences arising from such translations are recognized directly in other comprehensive
income (loss) and presented as a separate component of equity.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in the financial statements
and accompanying notes. Management must apply significant judgment in this process. On an ongoing basis, the
Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions, including but not limited to accruals, realizability of deferred tax
assets and the accretion of interest on the monetization liability. Actual results could materially differ from these
estimates.
Segment information
The Company’s entire business is managed by a single management team, which reports to the chief executive
officer. The chief executive officer is the chief operating decision maker. The Company has determined it has one
operating segment as its chief operating decision maker allocates resources and assesses the performance of the business
at this level. Accordingly, the Company has one reporting segment, which is the research and development of novel
treatments for liver and gastrointestinal diseases and disorders.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity at the date of purchase
of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Concentration of risk
Credit risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentration of credit risk consist
primarily of cash and cash equivalents. For banks and financial institutions, only independent financial institutions with
a high credit rating are utilized. The Company’s current license agreement is with an established and reputable
pharmaceutical company and, historically, the Company has not had any material collection risk related to its accounts
receivable.
Concentration of revenue
The Company generally does not require collateral or other security in support of accounts receivable. All revenue
and receivables relate to one licensee.
Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment, including leasehold improvements, are recorded at cost and depreciated when placed into
service using the straight-line method, based on their estimated useful lives as follows:
Asset Classification
IT Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leaseholds improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lesser of useful life or lease term
Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5-7
Estimated Useful Life
(in years)
3-5
5
F-9
Property and equipment purchased for less than $10,000 are expensed immediately. Costs for repairs and
maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Gains and losses on disposals of equipment are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount
and are recognized within Other operating (income) expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. In such instances, the recoverability of assets to be held and used
is measured first by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to future undiscounted net cash flows
expected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, an impairment loss would be
recognized if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. There were no impairments recorded
for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Research and development expenses
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and include primarily salaries, benefits and other staff-
related costs; clinical trial and related clinical manufacturing costs; contract services and other outside costs.
The Company’s nonclinical studies and clinical trials are performed by third-party contract research organizations
(CROs). Some of these expenses are billed monthly for services performed, while others are billed based upon
milestones achieved. For nonclinical studies, the significant factors used in estimating accruals include the percentage of
work completed to date and contract milestones achieved. For clinical trial expenses, the significant factors used in
estimating accruals include the number of patients enrolled and percentage of work completed to date and contract
milestones achieved. The Company’s estimates are highly dependent upon the timeliness and accuracy of the data
provided by the respective CROs regarding the status of the contracted activity, with adjustments made when deemed
necessary.
Revenue recognition
Milestone Payments
At the inception of each arrangement that includes development milestone payments, the Company evaluates
whether the milestones are considered probable of being achieved and estimates the amount to be included in the
transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not
occur, the associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the
control of the Company or the licensee, such as regulatory approvals, are not considered probable of being achieved until
those approvals are received. The Company evaluates factors such as the scientific, clinical, regulatory, commercial, and
other risks that must be overcome to achieve the particular milestone in making this assessment. There is considerable
judgment involved in determining whether it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur. At the end
of each subsequent reporting period, the Company reevaluates the probability of achievement of all milestones subject to
constraint and, if necessary, adjusts its estimate of the overall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a
cumulative catch-up basis, which would affect revenues and earnings in the period of adjustment.
Royalties
For arrangements that include sales-based royalties, including milestone payments based on a level of sales, and
the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, the Company recognizes revenue at the
later of (i) when the related sales occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has
been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).
F-10
In 2012, the Company entered into a license agreement (the Agreement) with EA Pharma Co., Ltd. (EA Pharma)
to develop a select product candidate (elobixibat) for registration and subsequent commercialization in select markets. In
conjunction with the Agreement, the Company granted EA Pharma an exclusive license to its intellectual property for
development and commercialization activities in the designated field and territories. The Company has completed all of
its performance obligations.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company is eligible to receive an additional regulatory-based milestone payment
under the Agreement of $5.3 million if a specified regulatory event is achieved for elobixibat. The cash payments and
any other payments for milestones and royalties from EA Pharma are non-refundable, non-creditable and not subject to
set-off.
The Agreement will continue until the last royalty period for any product in the territory, which is defined as the
period when there are no remaining patent rights or regulatory exclusivity in place for any products subject to royalties.
EA Pharma may terminate the Agreement at will upon 180 days’ prior written notice to the Company. Either party may
terminate the Agreement for the other party’s uncured material breach or insolvency and in certain other circumstances
agreed to by the parties.
Monetization of Future Royalties
In December 2017, the Company entered into a royalty interest acquisition agreement (RIAA) with HealthCare
Royalty Partners III, L.P. (HCR) pursuant to which it sold to HCR the right to receive all royalties from sales in Japan
and sales milestones achieved from any covered territory potentially payable to the Company under the Agreement, up
to a specified maximum “cap” amount of $78.8 million, based on the funds the Company received from HCR. In
January 2018, the Company received $44.5 million from HCR, net of certain transaction expenses, under the RIAA. On
June 8, 2020, the parties entered into an amendment to the RIAA pursuant to which HCR agreed to pay the Company an
additional $14.8 million, net of certain transactions expenses, in exchange for the elimination of the (i) $78.8 million cap
amount on HCR’s rights to receive royalties on sales in Japan and sales milestones for elobixibat in certain other
territories that may become payable by EA Pharma and (ii) the $15.0 million payable to the Company if a specified sales
milestone is achieved for elobixibat in Japan. The Company is obligated to make royalty interest payments to HCR
under the RIAA only to the extent it receives future Japanese royalties, sales milestones or other specified payments
from EA Pharma. Although the Company sold its rights to receive royalties from the sales of elobixibat in Japan, as a
result of its ongoing involvement in the cash flows related to these royalties, the Company will continue to account for
these royalties as revenue. Upon receipt of the payments from HCR the Company recorded net cash totaling $59.3
million as a liability related to sale of future royalties (royalty obligation). The royalty obligation will be amortized using
the effective interest rate method.
The following table shows the activity within the liability account for the year ended December 31, 2020:
Liability related to sale of future royalties—beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Accretion of interest expense on liability related to royalty monetization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of future royalties, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment of the liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liability related to sale of future royalties—ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Less current portion classified within accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net ending liability related to sale of future royalties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
December 31, 2020
(in thousands)
55,144
10,778
14,750
(12,078)
68,594
(2,700)
65,894
The Company records estimated royalties due for the current period in accrued other expenses until the payment is
received from EA Pharma at which time the Company then remits payment to HCR. In order to determine the accretion
of the royalty obligation, the Company is required to estimate the total amount of future royalty payments to be received
and submitted to HCR. The sum of these amounts less the $59.3 million proceeds the Company received will be
recorded as interest expense over the life of the royalty obligation. At December 31, 2020, the Company’s estimate of its
total interest expense resulted in an annual effective interest rate of approximately 19.0%.
F-11
The Company periodically assesses the estimated royalty payments to HCR and to the extent such payments are
greater or less than its initial estimates or the timing of such payments is materially different than its original estimates,
the Company will prospectively adjust the accretion of interest on the royalty obligation. There are a number of factors
that could materially affect the amount and the timing of royalty payments, most of which are not within the Company’s
control. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the rate of elobixibat prescriptions, the number of doses
administered, the introduction of competing products, manufacturing or other delays, patent protection, adverse events
that result in governmental health authority imposed restrictions on the use of the drug products, significant changes in
foreign exchange rates as the royalties remitted to HCR are in U.S. dollars while sales of elobixibat are in Japanese yen,
and sales never achieving forecasted numbers, which would result in reduced royalty payments and reduced non-cash
interest expense over the life of the royalty obligation. To the extent future royalties result in an amount less than the
liability, the Company is not obligated to fund any such shortfall.
Stock-based compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation awards in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718,
Compensation—Stock Compensation (ASC 718). ASC 718 requires all stock-based payments, including grants of stock
options, to be recognized in the consolidated statements of operations based on their respective fair values whether
granted to employees or non-employees.
The fair value of the Company’s stock options has been determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model,
which requires the input of subjective assumptions, including (i) the expected stock price volatility, (ii) the expected
term of the award, (iii) the risk-free interest rate and (iv) expected dividends. For the years ended December 31, 2020
and December 31, 2019, due to the lack of historical and implied volatility data of the Company’s common stock and
equivalents, the expected volatility has been estimated based on the historical volatilities of peer companies in the
Company’s industry that are publicly traded. The Company selected companies that it considers to have comparable
characteristics to the Company, including enterprise value, risk profiles and position within the industry and with
historical share price information sufficient to meet the expected term of the stock options. The historical volatility data
has been computed using the daily closing prices for the selected companies.
Due to the lack of sufficient historical data, the Company used the “simplified” method, whereby the expected
term equals the arithmetic average of the vesting term and the original contractual term of the award, to determine the
expected term of stock options.
The Company records compensation expense for service-based awards over the vesting period of the award on a
straight-line basis. For awards with service and performance based conditions, compensation related to the performance-
based vesting conditions is recognized when achievement of the performance condition is considered probable and the
compensation expense related to the service condition is recorded using the accelerated method.
Modifications to stock-based awards are treated as an exchange of the original award for a new award with total
compensation equal to the grant-date fair value of the original award plus any incremental value of the modification. The
incremental value is based on the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award
immediately before the modification.
Employee benefits
Pension obligations
The Company has a defined contribution pension plan for its Sweden-based employees whereby the Company
pays contributions to employee benefit or insurance plans on a mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis.
The Company paid $0.7 million and $0.4 million to the plans for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019,
respectively.
F-12
401(k)
The Company has a 401(k) retirement plan in which all U.S.-based employees are eligible to participate. The
Company contributed $0.5 million and $0.2 million to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019,
respectively. The Company matches employee contributions to the plan, on a per employee basis, up to 4% of each
employee’s wages for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Loss contingencies
Loss contingencies are recorded as liabilities when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of
loss is reasonably estimable. Disclosure is required when there is a reasonable possibility that an ultimate loss will be
material. Contingent liabilities are often resolved over long periods of time. Estimating probable losses requires analysis
that often depends on judgments about potential actions by third parties, such as regulators.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740). Deferred income
taxes are recorded for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and amounts recognized for income tax purposes. The Company records a
valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount of future tax benefit that is more likely than not to be
realized.
Income tax expense consists of taxes currently payable and changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities calculated
according to local tax rules. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on temporary differences that arise between
carrying values used for financial reporting purposes and amounts used for taxation purposes of assets and liabilities and
the future tax benefits of tax loss carry forwards. A deferred tax asset is recognized only to the extent that it is more
likely than not that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be utilized.
Significant judgment is required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. In
assessing the need for a valuation allowance, the Company considers all available evidence for each jurisdiction
including past operating results, estimates of future taxable income and the feasibility of ongoing tax planning strategies.
In the event that the Company changes its determination as to the amount of deferred tax assets that can be realized, the
Company will adjust its valuation allowance with a corresponding impact to income tax expense in the period in which
such determination is made.
The amount of deferred tax provided is calculated using tax rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The impact of
tax law changes is recognized in periods when the change is enacted.
A two-step approach is applied pursuant to ASC 740 in the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The first step is to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates
that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained in an audit, including resolution of any related
appeals or litigation processes. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50%
likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement.
The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalty expenses associated with uncertain tax positions as a
component of income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of the years ended December 31,
2020 and 2019, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions and no amounts have
been recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Net loss per share
Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to holders of common stock by the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted net loss per share is calculated by dividing the
F-13
net loss attributable to holders of common stock by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock
outstanding. If the Company were in a net income position, diluted net income per share would be calculated by dividing
the net income attributable to holders of common stock by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock plus
dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding.
Goodwill
Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price in a business combination over the fair value of identifiable net assets
acquired. Goodwill has an indefinite life and is subject to periodic testing for impairment.
Goodwill is assessed at least annually, but also whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying
value may not be recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment review, include: (a) significant underperformance
relative to historical or projected future operating results; (b) significant changes in the manner of or use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for the Company’s overall business; (c) significant negative industry or economic trends;
(d) significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period; and (e) a decline in the Company’s market
capitalization below net book value.
The Company conducts an impairment assessment on October 1 each year taking a quantitative test which
compares the fair value to the net carrying value, and records an impairment of goodwill to the extent that the net
carrying value exceeds the fair value. During the fourth quarter of 2020 and 2019, we completed our annual impairment
assessment and concluded that goodwill was not impaired in any of those years.
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software
(Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That
Is a Service Contract.” (ASU 2018-15). This standard aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs
incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs
incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software
license). The guidance also requires the entity to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement
that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement, which includes reasonably certain renewals. The
Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2020 on a prospective basis and there was no material impact on
its consolidated financial statements.
2. Fair value of financial instruments
In measuring fair value, the Company evaluates valuation techniques such as the market approach, the income
approach and the cost approach. A three-level valuation hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques
that are used to measure fair value, is based upon whether such inputs are observable or unobservable.
Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect
market assumptions made by the reporting entity. The three-level hierarchy for the inputs to valuation techniques is
briefly summarized as follows:
Level 1—Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical instruments in active markets;
Level 2—Observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, or model-derived valuations whose significant inputs
are observable for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and
Level 3—Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s estimate of assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability.
F-14
3. Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 31,
2020
2019
IT equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total property and equipment, gross . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
318
$
—
58
453
829
(351)
478
$
306
81
58
378
823
(226)
597
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $0.2 million and $0.1 million,
respectively.
4. Accrued expenses
Accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
Accrued payroll and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,492 $ 2,990
Accrued professional fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
359
Accrued development costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,968 2,887
Accrued liability related to monetization of future royalties . . . . . . . . . . . 2,700 6,430
Accrued other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,242
820
Total accrued expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,051 $ 13,486
649
Year Ended
December 31,
2020
2019
5. Commitments and contingencies
Operating lease commitments
The Company’s portfolio of commercial real estate leases consists of office space for its corporate headquarters in
Boston, Massachusetts and for administrative space in Göteborg, Sweden, both of which are accounted for as operating
leases. These leases include renewal rights and, as for the corporate headquarters lease, escalating payments. On
March 28, 2019, the Company entered into an amendment to the Boston, Massachusetts lease to (i) replace the
Company’s prior office space with a new office space that is being leased from the same landlord and (ii) extend the
term of the lease through October 31, 2026. The new leased space contains monthly lease payments subject to annual
escalations of $1.00 per square foot for the remaining term of the lease with the Company obligated to make
approximately $4.2 million of aggregate lease payments over the term of the lease, or approximately $900,000 annually.
The Company’s lease in Göteborg, Sweden includes the rental of office space. This lease includes annual rent
escalations based on the changes in the Swedish Consumer Price Index. This lease renews automatically for consecutive
three year terms unless notice of non-renewal is given by either party at least nine months prior to the end of the current
term of February 2022.
As of December 31, 2020 the net balance of ROU assets totaled $4.1 million and was classified within other non-
current assets. Operating lease expense was $1.2 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and
2019, respectively. There were no short-term lease or variable lease costs incurred for the either of the years ended
F-15
December 31, 2020 and 2019. As of December 31, 2020, the weighted average remaining lease term for the Company’s
operating leases was 5.68 years. As of December 31, 2020, the weighted- average discount rate was 9.95%.
The following table summarizes the Company’s significant contractual obligations under operating leases as of
payment due date by period at December 31, 2020:
Total Minimum Lease Payments
(in thousands)
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2024 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2025 and beyond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Less imputed interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total lease liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Reported as:
Other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total lease liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
1,028
906
921
936
1,756
5,547
(1,344)
4,203
(640)
(3,563)
(4,203)
As of December 31, 2020, future minimum commitments under facility operating leases were $4.2 million. For the
years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company paid $1.0 million and $0.4 million in cash related to operating
leases, respectively.
Agreements with CROs
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had various agreements with CROs for the conduct of specified research
and development activities and, based on the terms of the respective agreements, the Company is contractually obligated
to make future payments of up to $7.2 million upon the completion of contracted work.
Legal Contingency
On November 18, 2019 we entered into a settlement agreement with Ferring resolving to the parties’ mutual
satisfaction a litigation we brought in New York State Supreme Court concerning the License Agreement, dated July 2,
2012, between us and Ferring. The parties have exchanged mutual releases and filed a stipulation voluntarily
discontinuing the case with prejudice. Albireo received net proceeds of $3.7 million included in other non-operating
income in the consolidated statements of operations.
6. Note Payable
2020 Loan and Security Agreement
On June 8, 2020, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the Loan and Security Agreement)
with the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties to the Loan and Security
Agreement, as lenders (collectively, referred to as the “Lender”), and Hercules Capital, Inc., in its capacity as
administrative agent and collateral agent for itself and Lender (in such capacity, the “Agent” or “Hercules”) pursuant to
which term loans of up to an aggregate principal amount of up to $80.0 million (the “Term Loans”) are available to the
Company. The Loan Agreement provides for (i) an initial term loan advance of $10.0 million, which closed on June 8,
2020, (ii) subject to the achievement of certain initial performance milestones (“Performance Milestone I”), a right of the
Company to request that the Lender make additional term loan advances to the Company in an aggregate principal
F-16
amount of up to $20.0 million from January 1, 2021 through December 15, 2021 in minimum increments of $10.0
million, and (iii) subject to the Lender’s investment committee’s sole discretion, a right of the Company to request that
the Lender make additional term loan advances in an aggregate principal amount of up to $45.0 million through
March 31, 2022 in minimum increments of $5.0 million. The Company is required to pay an end of term fee (“End of
Term Charge”) equal to 6.95% of the aggregate principal amount of the Term Loans advances upon repayment.
The Term Loans mature on January 1, 2024, which is extendable to June 1, 2024 upon achievement of
Performance Milestone I (the “Maturity Date”).
The Term Loan bears interest at an annual rate equal to the greater of 9.15% and 9.15% plus the prime rate of
interest minus 3.25%. Borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement are repayable in monthly interest-only
payments through January 1, 2022 and extendable to (i) July 1, 2022 upon achievement of Performance Milestone I and
(ii) July 1, 2023 upon achievement of certain additional performance milestones. After the interest-only payment period,
borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement are repayable in equal monthly payments of principal and accrued
interest until the Maturity Date. At the Company’s option, the Company may elect to prepay all, but not less than all, of
the outstanding term loan by paying the entire principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest thereon plus a
prepayment charge equal to the following percentage of the principal amount being prepaid: 2.0% of the principal
amount outstanding if the prepayment occurs after the first nine months following the Closing Date, but on or prior to
24 months following the Closing Date, and 1.0% of the principal amount outstanding at any time thereafter but prior to
the Maturity Date.
In connection with the Loan Agreement, the Company granted Agent a security interest senior to any current and
future debts and to any security interest, in all of the Company’s right, title, and interest in, to and under all of
Company’s property and other assets, and certain equity interests and accounts of Albireo AB, subject to limited
exceptions including the Borrower’s intellectual property. The Loan Agreement also contains certain events of default,
representations, warranties and non-financial covenants of the Company.
The debt discount and issuance costs are being accreted to the principal amount of debt and being amortized from
the date of issuance through the Maturity Date to interest expense using the effective-interest rate method. The effective
interest rate of the outstanding debt under the Loan Agreement is approximately 15.3%.
As of December 31, 2020 the carrying value of the note payable consists of the following:
December 31, 2020
(in thousands)
Note payable, including End of Term Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt discount, net of accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Note payable net of discount, long-term . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
10,695
(1,074)
9,621
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recognized $0.8 million, of interest expense related to
the Loan Agreement. No interest expense was associated with the Loan Agreement for the year ended December 31,
2019.
Through December 31, 2020, the Company borrowed $10.0 million under the Loan Agreement and incurred $1.3
million of debt discount and issuance costs inclusive of facility fees, legal fees, End of Term Charge and fair value of the
warrant.
F-17
Estimated future principal payments due under the Loan Agreement, including the contractual End of Term
Charge are as follows as of December 31, 2020:
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2024 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
4,553
4,994
1,148
As of December 31, 2020, based on Level 3 inputs and the borrowing rates available to the Company for loans
with similar terms and consideration of the Company’s credit risk, the carrying value of the Company’s variable interest
rate debt, excluding unamortized debt issuance costs, approximates fair value.
Note Principal Payments
(in thousands)
Warrants
Under the Loan and Security Agreement, the Company agreed to issue to Hercules warrants (the “Warrants”) to
purchase a number of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) equal to
1% of the aggregate amount of the Term Loans that are funded, as such amounts are funded. On the Closing Date, the
Company issued a Warrant for 5,311 shares of Common Stock. The Warrants will be exercisable for a period of seven
years from the date of the issuance of each Warrant at a per-share exercise price equal to $18.83, subject to certain
adjustments as specified in the Warrants. In addition, the Company has granted to the holders of the Warrants certain
registration rights. Specifically, the Company has agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to (i) file registration
statements with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 60 days following the date of the issuance of each
Warrant for purposes of registering the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants for resale by
Hercules, and (ii) cause the registration statement to be declared effective as soon as practicable after filing, and in any
event no later than 180 days after the date of the issuance of each Warrant.
The Company accounted for the Warrants as equity instruments since they were indexed to the Company’s
common stock and met the criteria for classification in stockholders’ equity. The relative fair value of the Warrants
related to the first tranche funding was approximately $0.1 million, and was treated as a discount to the Term Loans.
This amount is being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the Term Loans.
The Company estimated the fair value of the Warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
7. Goodwill
There was no change in goodwill during 2020 or 2019.
8. Net loss per share
The following table sets forth the computation of Basic loss per share and Diluted loss per share (in thousands,
except for share and per share data):
Basic and Diluted loss per share:
Numerator
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
(107,633) $
(62,717)
Denominator
Year Ended
2020
2019
Weighted average number of shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . 15,983,058 12,437,742
(5.04)
Basic and Diluted loss per share: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
(6.73) $
F-18
The following outstanding common stock equivalents were excluded from the computation of Diluted loss per
share for the periods presented because including them would have been anti-dilutive:
Options to purchase common stock, RSUs and warrants . . . . . . . . . . . 2,413,037
2020
2019
1,833,920
Year Ended
9. Income taxes
Effects of the Tax Cuts and Job Act
The Company has had an overall net operating loss position since its inception. There was no current or deferred
tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the components of loss before income taxes were as follows (in
thousands):
U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (86,041) $ (29,337)
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (21,592) (33,380)
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (107,633) $ (62,717)
A reconciliation of the U.S. statutory income tax rate to the consolidated effective income tax rate was as follows:
Year Ended
December 31,
2020
2019
Year Ended
December 31,
2020
2019
U.S. statutory income tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State taxes, net of federal tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in deferred tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effective income tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
21 %
—
5
(26)
—
—
0.0 %
21 %
(1)
3
(20)
(2)
(1)
0.0 %
F-19
Deferred taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the bases of assets and liabilities for financial
statement and income tax purposes. The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the
deferred tax assets are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended
December 31,
2020
2019
Deferred tax assets:
Tax loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 59,790 $ 35,120
130
Research and development credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
530
Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,090
Stock compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,910
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,410
Total gross deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72,180 41,190
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (71,040) (39,910)
Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
1,140 $ 1,280
Deferred tax liabilities:
130
1,870
4,750
4,420
1,220
Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Right of use asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
(20) $
(1,120)
(1,140)
— $
(30)
(1,250)
(1,280)
—
A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of the favorable tax attributes
in future returns, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $71.0 million and $39.9 million at December 31,
2020 and 2019, respectively. The change in valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, were
$31.1 million and $12.6 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2020, deferred tax assets related to net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards were $59.8
million, which may be used subject to certain limitations to offset future taxable income, if any. The NOL includes
approximately $1.5 million for U.S. federal tax purposes that are subject to expire in 2036 and approximately $94.2
million of federal net operating losses which have no expiration date and can be carried forward indefinitely. The
Company has state NOLs of approximately $244.4 million which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities
and that expire at various dates through 2039. Additional NOLs of approximately $120.5 million were generated in
various non-U.S. jurisdictions and will not expire. A valuation allowance has been established on the NOL
carryforwards as it is uncertain as to whether future taxable income will be generated to utilize such NOLs.
Utilization of the NOL and credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to ownership
change limitations that have occurred previously or that could occur in the future as provided by Section 382 of the Code
and similar state and foreign provisions. These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOL and credit
carryforwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In general, an
ownership change, as defined by Code Section 382, results from transactions increasing the ownership of certain
shareholders or public groups in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period.
During 2016, the Company completed an analysis to assess and concluded that an ownership change within the meaning
of Code Section 382 occurred. The analysis has not yet been updated beyond 2016.
The Company’s policy is for any earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries to be indefinitely invested outside the United
States on the basis of estimates that future domestic cash generation will be sufficient to meet future domestic cash needs
and the Company’s specific plans for reinvestment of those subsidiary earnings, if any.
F-20
Uncertain tax positions
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions under the recognition and measurement criteria of ASC 740-10.
For those tax positions for which it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will be sustained, the Company records the
largest amount of tax benefit with a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority
that has full knowledge of all relevant information. If the Company does not believe that it is not more likely than not
that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit is recognized. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, no uncertain tax
positions have been recorded. Interest and penalties related to the settlement of uncertain tax positions, if any, will be
reflected in income tax expense. The Company did not recognize any interest or penalties associated with unrecognized
tax benefits in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect any material changes
to the unrecognized benefits within 12 months of the reporting date. Due to existence of the valuation allowance, future
changes in the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits will not impact its effective tax rate.
The Company files U.S. federal and state tax returns and has determined that its major tax jurisdictions are the
United States and Massachusetts, as well as the United Kingdom and Sweden. The Company’s tax returns may be
examined for certain tax jurisdictions back to December 31, 2016.
The Company is subject to a territorial tax system under the Act, in which the Company is required to provide for
tax on Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The Company has
adopted an accounting policy to provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred as a period
expense.
10. Stockholders’ equity
Preferred Stock
As of December 31, 2020, the Company has 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized. There are no shares
of preferred stock issued or outstanding.
Financing
2019 Sales Agreement
In May 2019, we sold 637,367 shares of our common stock for net proceeds of approximately $20.8 million
pursuant to an at the market offering.
In February 2020, we completed an underwritten public offering of 2,190,750 shares of our common stock under a
universal shelf registration statement for net proceeds of approximately $43.0 million.
In May 2020, we filed a new universal shelf registration on Form S-3 with the SEC, pursuant to which we
registered for sale up to $200.0 million of any combination of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities,
warrants, rights and/or units from time to time and at prices and on terms that we may determine. As of December 31,
2020, $40.0 million of securities remain available for issuance under the shelf registration statement.
In September 2020, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 4,000,000 shares of its common
stock. The Company received net proceeds from this offering of approximately $150.4 million, after deducting
underwriting discounts and, commissions but before deducting offering expenses.
F-21
11. Stock-based Compensation
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of
Operations as follows (in thousands):
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,646 $ 4,600
5,969 2,978
Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,615 $ 7,578
A summary of the outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2020 is as follows:
Year Ended
December 31,
2020
2019
Stock Options Outstanding
Weighted-
Number of Price Per
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Average Remaining Aggregate
Intrinsic
Exercise Contractual
Value (in
thousands)
8.06 $ 8,421
Term
(Years)
Share
Outstanding—December 31, 2019 . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expirations/forfeitures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,768,170 $ 22.34
864,725 $ 26.18
(133,992) $ 23.88
(127,080) $ 19.86
Outstanding—December 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . 2,371,823 $ 23.89
Exercisable—December 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . 1,024,923 $ 20.97
Vested or expected to vest at—
7.75 $ 32,764
6.39 $ 17,109
December 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,371,823 $ 23.89
7.75 $ 32,764
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock and the
exercise price of outstanding, in-the-money options.
As of December 31, 2020, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested options was $17.4
million, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted average vesting period of 2.57 years.
In determining the estimated fair value of the stock-based awards, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option
pricing model and assumptions discussed below.
The fair value of share option awards was estimated with the following assumptions:
As of December 31,
2020
Price per share of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15.62 -
-
Expected term (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1
Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-
0.35
Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
79.41 -
0%
Dividend rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31,
2019
$ 16.92 - 37.86
5.6 -
1.37 -
43.65
6.1
6.1
2.6 %
1.7 %
92.9 % 81.04 - 144.9 %
0%
Restricted Stock Units
Each Restricted Stock Units “RSU” award represents one share of common stock and each award vests 25% on
the first anniversary and in equal quarterly installments thereafter. The costs of the awards, determined as the fair market
value of the shares on the grant date, are expensed on a straight line basis over the length of the award.
F-22
A summary of outstanding RSU as of December 31, 2020 is as follows:
Weighted
Average
Non-vested and outstanding RSU balance at December 31, 2019 . . . . .
Changes during the period:
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expirations/forfeitures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-vested and outstanding RSU balance at December 31, 2020 . . . .
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Shares
65,750 $
Grant-Date
Fair Value
24.67
—
(7,188)
(25,497)
$
33,065
—
20.93
25.36
24.95
In June of 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan)
that allows eligible employees to purchase shares of its common stock at a discount through payroll deductions. The
Plan was subsequently approved by shareholders, with 300,000 shares being available to be issued under the Plan.
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan “ESPP” terms state implementation will be by a series of six-month offering
periods, with a new offering period commencing on June 1 and December 1 of each year or the first business day
thereafter. The initial Offering Period under the Plan began on December 1, 2018. During the years ended December 31,
2020 and 2019, 14,270 and 8,354 shares were purchased under the Plan, respectively. As of December 31, 2020,
277,376 shares are available to be issued. The Plan is intended to qualify under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
Section 423. ESPP expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $0.1 million and $0.1 million,
respectively. The expense is disclosed in the stock-based compensation expense table within this footnote.
F-23
Directors
Stockholders and Stock Listing
David Chiswell, Ph.D.
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Albireo Pharma
NonExecutive Director, Avillion LLP
Ronald H.W. Cooper
President and Chief Executive Officer, Albireo Pharma
Michael Gutch, Ph.D.
Chief Business Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Entasis
Therapeutics
Roger A. Jeffs, Ph.D.
Co-Founder and Vice Chairman of Kriya Therapeutics
Anne Klibanski, M.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Partners Healthcare
Stephanie S. Okey, M.S.
Former Senior Vice President, Head of North America,
Rare Diseases, Genzyme, a Sanofi company
Davey S. Scoon
NonExecutive Director of the Board of Trustees,
Allianz Global Investors
Executive Officers
Ronald H.W. Cooper
President and Chief Executive Officer
Jan P. Mattsson, Ph.D.
Chief Scientific Officer
Simon N.R. Harford
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Patrick T. Horn, M.D., Ph.D.
Chief Medical Officer
Martha J. Carter
Chief Regulatory Officer
Pamela Stephenson
Chief Commercial Officer
Jason G. Duncan
Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel and Secretary
Michelle Graham
Chief Human Resources Officer
Our common stock is traded on The Nasdaq Capital
Market under the symbol ALBO. On March 30, 2021, the
closing price of our common stock was $33.82 per share
and our common stock was held by 24 stockholders of
record.
Investor Information
You may obtain a copy of any of the exhibits to our Annual
Report on Form 10K free of charge. These documents are
available on our website at www.albireopharma.com or by
contacting Investor Relations at Albireo Pharma, Inc.
Requests for information about Albireo Pharma, Inc. should
be directed to:
Investor Relations
Albireo Pharma, Inc.
10 Post Office Square, Suite 1000
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: (857) 2545555
Annual Meeting
The annual meeting of stockholders will be held virtually
via live webcast on Thursday,
June 17, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. ET.
You will be able to attend our annual meeting, vote and
submit your questions during the meeting by visiting
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ALBO2021.
Internet Website
www.albireopharma.com
Legal Counsel
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Boston, Massachusetts
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company
1 State Street, 30th Floor
New York, NY 100041561
Albireo Pharma, Inc.
10 Post Office Square, Suite 1000
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
(857) 254-5555
www.albireopharma.com