Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Banks - Regional / Alerus Financial Corporation

Alerus Financial Corporation

alrs · NASDAQ Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker alrs
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Financial Services
Industry Banks - Regional
Employees 846
← All annual reports
FY2017 Annual Report · Alerus Financial Corporation
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2 0 1 7   A N N U A L   R E P O R T

N E W   H E I G H T S . 

N E W   A M B I T I O N S .

1

T H E   P O T E N T I A L   F O R   G R E A T N E S S   E X I S T S   I N 

E V E R Y   B U S I N E S S   A N D   I N   E V E R Y   P E R S O N . 

A L E R U S   S E R V E S   A S   A   C ATA LY S T   F O R   O U R   C L I E N T S   T O 

T U R N   T H AT   P O T E N T I A L   I N T O   A C H I E V E M E N T ,   T O   M A K E   T H E 

A S P I R AT I O N A L   R E A L ,   A N D   T O   C H A R T   A   C O U R S E   T O W A R D 

F I N A N C I A L   H E A LT H .   I N V E S T I N G   I N   T H E I R   J O U R N E Y S   A L L O W S 

U S   T O   C R E AT E   VA L U E   F O R   Y O U ,   O U R   S T O C K H O L D E R S .

Our story is a collection of client stories, spanning across more than a century. Yet for all of that history, our 
greatest honor lies ahead: the opportunity to accompany still more clients as they navigate their fi  nancial 
lives to achieve their dreams.

Company Portfolio

Stockholder Return

Diversifi ed fi  nancial services company

Earnings per common share: $1.10

$2.1 billion banking assets 

Dividends per share: $0.48

$3.8 billion assets under management 

Stock price range 2017: $16.67 - $20.75

$28.2 billion assets under administration 

$867.3 million mortgage loans originated

Last Trade 2017: $20.45

Last Trade 2016: $17.00 

Total stockholder return: 23.1%*

* Calculated as Last Trade 2017 minus Last Trade 2016 
plus dividends per share divided by Last Trade 2016.

Diversified Revenue Stream 

NET REVENUE

$17 1 .1 million
$67.7 MILLION  NET INTEREST INCOME

$103.5 MILLION NON-INTEREST INCOME

Net interest 
income: 39.5%

Retirement and 
benefi ts revenue: 
36.5%

Mortgage banking 
revenue: 12.5%

Wealth 
management 
revenue: 8.6%

Banking 
fees: 2.9%

Core Strengths

CORE BUSINESS LINES

Alerus Team

Strong balance sheet

Diversifi ed earnings

Relationship-oriented business 
model focused on advice

Highly skilled professional 
service employee base

Commitment to business 
expansion opportunities

Commitment to leadership 
development

Commitment to technology 
and innovation

Loyal client base 

Client Base

45,800 consumers 

11,425 businesses 

6,500 employer-sponsored 
retirement plans

354,000 employer-sponsored 
retirement plan participants

40,000 health savings account 
participants

14,000 fl exible spending 
account/health reimbursement 
arrangement participants

Business Banking
• Commercial and commercial 

real estate lending

• Agriculture lending

• Treasury management

• Deposit services

Consumer Banking
• Deposit products and services

• Consumer lending

• Private banking

Mortgage
• Residential mortgage lending

• Purchasing or refi  nancing

• Residential construction lending

• Home equity/second mortgages

Retirement and Benef its
• Retirement plan 
administration

• Retirement plan 

investment advisory

• ESOP fi duciary services

• Payroll administration services

• HSA/FSA/HRA administration

• COBRA

Wealth Management
• Advisory services

• Trust and fi duciary services

• Investment management

• Insurance and health planning

• Financial planning

• Education planning

789 employees 

Market Presence

Grand Forks, ND
•  Five full-service banking and 
wealth management offi ces

Fargo, ND
•  Three full-service banking and 
wealth management offi ces

Twin Cities, MN
•  Six full-service banking and 
wealth management offi ces 

•  Two residential mortgage offi ces

Duluth, MN
•  Two full-service banking and 
wealth management offi ces

Scottsdale, AZ
•  One full-service banking and 
wealth management offi ce

National Presence

•  Three retirement and benefi ts 

offi ces in Minnesota

•  Two retirement and benefi ts 

offi ces in Michigan

•  One retirement and benefi ts 

offi ce in New Hampshire

•  Serve clients in all 50 

states through retirement 
and benefi t services

Nationally recognized for our Performance

Earned BauerFinancial’s highest 5-star rating, a distinction for banks 
excelling in areas of capital adequacy, profi tability, and asset quality. 
(Jan. 2018)

Ranked 56th on the 2017 Bank Performance Scorecard within the 
$1-5 billion category by Bank Director magazine, a rating recognizing 
performance based on profi tability, capitalization, and asset quality. 
(July 2017)

Ranked 21st for number of sponsors, 27th for number of participants, and 
26th for size of plan assets under management by Pension & Investments, 
who ranks the top recordkeepers nationally by size. (Sep. 2016)

3

D E A R   S T O C K H O L D E R S , 

C U S T O M E R S ,   A N D   F R I E N D S ,

I   B E G I N   T H I S   L E T T E R   W I T H   A   S E N S E   O F   G R A T I T U D E   A N D 

P R I D E   A B O U T   A L E R U S   A N D   W H A T   W E   A C C O M P L I S H E D 

T O G E T H E R   I N   2 0 1 7.   O U R S   I S   A   V I B R A N T   C O M P A N Y   W I T H 

A N   E X T R A O R D I N A R Y   H E R I T A G E ,   A N   E X C I T I N G   P R E S E N T , 

A N D   A   P R O M I S I N G   F U T U R E .

2017 was a transformative year for Alerus in many ways. Not only did we perform very well, but we did so while 
taking steps to reshape our company from the inside out, putting ourselves in position to strengthen relationships 
with clients, work even better together, and continue to create value for our stockholders.

Our industry is rapidly evolving, driven largely by technological advancements and a corresponding shift in the ways 
clients interact with their chosen fi nancial institutions. This presents an opportunity for our company, which has been 
built thoughtfully, strategically, and always with a focus on what is best for clients, to meet their needs in unique, 
innovative ways. This shift also creates opportunities to expand our reach, make an impact on more clients, and grow 
our franchise. That is what our transformation is all about. 

Becoming One Alerus

We began the year by committing to an initiative called One Alerus. This is not so much a new business model as it 
is an expression of who we are and where we want to go. Underpinning One Alerus is a passion for serving clients 
through a combination of powerful technology and skilled advisors — a “high-tech, high-touch” approach that we 
believe clients of today, and certainly those of tomorrow, both demand and deserve. 

To help make One Alerus successful, we redesigned the structure of our company, adding new leaders, reorganizing 
teams, and ensuring that our employees are in position to maximize their talents. This will help us deliver on the high-
touch aspect of our approach as we move forward. The high-tech portion is also underway, as we engaged with a leading 
fi nancial technology company to create an easy-to-use account platform for our clients and began a relationship with a 
world-class provider of client relationship management tools to manage interactions with clients.  

We view One Alerus as the engine 
that will power our future growth, 
heighten our ability to help clients 
achieve fi  nancial security, and 
ultimately, solidify our standing 
as the most trusted choice for all 
our stakeholders. Rooted in ethics 
and integrity, One Alerus brings 
together the diverse areas of 
our company in powerful ways, 
allowing us to impact clients 
more meaningfully and generate 
long-term value for stockholders. 

Our Performance and 
the Impact of Tax Reform 

Turning to our fi  nancial performance, I am happy to 
report that 2017 was a strong year, though our results 
were affected by signifi cant legislative changes. 
Specifi cally, at the end of 2017, the United States 
Congress passed the nation’s fi  rst major tax reform 
bill since the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Signed into law 
by President Donald Trump on December 22, 2017, 
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is expected to positively 
impact earnings for all companies, including fi nancial 
institutions, in the future. 

However, the new law, which reduced the corporate 
tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, required many 
companies to remeasure their deferred tax assets in 
the fourth quarter of 2017. Absent this requirement, 
Alerus would have reported net income of $20.0 
million for the year on pretax earnings of $32.9 
million — record pretax earnings for our company. 

But the effect of remeasurement was the recognition 
of a one-time charge of $4.6 million, bringing our 
reported net income to $15.4 million for 2017. 

Despite the tax impact, our performance improved 
compared to the previous year. Our $15.4 million in 
net income was an increase of 10.1 percent from 2016 
when we earned $14.0 million. 2017 earnings per 
common share were $1.10 compared to $1.00 in 2016, 
an increase of 10 percent. Total revenue increased 
from $167.1 million in 2016 to $171.1 million in 2017 
as we benefited from both our expanded product 
set (HSA, FSA, COBRA, and payroll services gained 
through our acquisition of Alliance Benefit Group 
North Central States, Inc.) and our strategies to drive 
organic growth across business lines. Additionally, 
we returned to stockholders a cash dividend of $0.48 
per share in 2017, an increase of 9.1 percent from 
2016’s $0.44 per share. We are proud to say our cash 
dividends have increased approximately 9 percent 
per year for 37 years. Finally, we delivered a strong 
total stockholder return of 23.1 percent for the year.

While tax reform reduced this year’s reported net income, 
many of the new provisions, such as a lower corporate 
tax rate, should provide increased fl exibility to invest, 
grow, and deliver even more value to stockholders in 
future years. This, along with our enduring commitment 
to responsible management and our aspirations for 
measured, steady growth, has Alerus well-positioned to 
continue delivering value to stockholders. I encourage 
you to read the accompanying Management’s Discussion 
and Analysis for a full discussion of all the factors 
underlying this year’s performance, including more 
on the impact of tax reform. 

Focusing on Client Experience 

Today’s fi nancial institutions need to be where clients 
are, by making services available where, when, and 
how they choose — whether face to face; through 
mobile devices, personal computers, or ATMs; or over 
the phone. Being there for clients requires investing in 
the people and technology that keep us ahead of the 
curve in digital experience, information accessibility, 
and the delivery of fi  nancial advice. 

Through proactive, strategic planning, we have 
become a valuable resource for clients throughout 
their fi  nancial lifetimes; from fi  rst job to fi  rst house, 
from starting a business to succession planning, 
we are there to help them reach the personal and 
business milestones that matter most. To ensure 
that we remain this kind of resource, we are focusing 
ever more sharply on client experience. 

We laid the groundwork this year for a number of 
improvements designed to make it even easier for 
clients to interact with us. Geared toward helping 
people improve their fi nancial fi tness, these resources, 
often based on technology, will provide clients with a 
better understanding of their current fi nancial picture 
and guidance on how to achieve their goals, whatever 
they may be. We are excited to introduce these tools 
throughout 2018.

A Brief Recognition

I must take a moment to acknowledge the 
contributions of James J. Karley who, after two 
decades of service as a member of our board of 
directors, will retire in May 2018. Jim built his 
businesses — Johnstown Bean, North Central 
Commodities, and Cavalier Bean — on the same 
North Dakota ground that gave Alerus its start. 
It is safe to say we would not be where we are 
today as a company without his steady guidance 
and strong, informed voice in the boardroom. On 
behalf of everyone at Alerus, I thank you, Jim, for 
20 years of stewardship and insight.

Leadership Planning 
and Development 

Recognizing that our current and future prosperity 
hinges in large part on the strength and vision of 
leaders, we continue to build talent internally and 
fi  nd it externally. We are fortunate to have a deep 
pool of talented leaders within our company, and we 
are equally fortunate that we are able to attract great 
people from outside our walls. 2017 was an excellent 
illustration of this, as we were pleased to welcome two 
new leaders to our executive team, one from within 
and another new to Alerus. 

Ann McConn, a longtime Alerus employee, became our 
chief business offi cer after many years serving in other 
leadership roles, including market president, director of 
wealth management, and vice president of retirement 
and benefi ts. Ann is an ideal fi t on our executive team 
thanks to her proven strategic approach, client 
focus, and industry and institutional knowledge. Katie 
Lorenson, our new chief fi  nancial offi cer, joined us in 
December after a successful tenure at a publicly traded 
fi  nancial institution where she also held the CFO role. 
Katie’s experience in fi nance, capital planning, market 
analysis, and mergers and acquisitions makes her a 
valuable addition to our company.

Leadership development is a crucial part of remaining 
an employer of choice and a place where talented 
people can realize their full potential. We made exciting 
progress in this regard with the formation of the Alerus 
Leadership Council, which brings together current and 
future leaders as a dynamic body that helps move us 
in the right direction. Through the Council and other 
methods, we are maintaining a continual focus on 
developing the next generation of company leadership. 

5

T H A N K   Y O U . 

I   A M   E N E R G I Z E D   A B O U T   T H E   F U T U R E 

O F   A L E R U S   A N D   W H A T   W E   C A N   A C H I E V E . 

I T   I S   I M P O R T A N T   T O   R E C O G N I Z E   A N D 

E X P R E S S   M Y   G R A T I T U D E   T O   T H E   P E O P L E 

W H O   M A K E   U S   W H A T   W E   A R E . 

To our stockholders, thank you for placing your confi dence 

in Alerus; we will continue to do all we can to reward it. 

To our clients, thank you for trusting us as your fi  nancial 

services provider; we will keep working diligently to 

help you achieve your goals. To our board of directors 

and our management team, thank you for your support, 

guidance, energy, and enthusiasm; we all benefi t from your 

perspectives. And fi  nally, to every employee, thank you for 

your commitment to excellence; you are the faces of this 

company and I couldn’t ask for better representatives.

Randy L. Newman

Chairman, President, and CEO

7

A L E R U S   C O N T I N U O U S L Y   B A L A N C E S   G R O W T H , 

R I S K ,   A N D   P E R F O R M A N C E   T O   D E L I V E R   V A L U E 

T O   S T O C K H O L D E R S . 

T H I S   B A L A N C E D   A P P R O A C H ,   A L O N G   W I T H   P R U D E N T 

M A N A G E M E N T ,   H A S   A L L O W E D   U S   T O   R E W A R D   S H A R E H O L D E R S 

W I T H   4 7   S T R A I G H T   Y E A R S *   O F   C A S H   D I V I D E N D S . 

2017 was a strong year for Alerus, with pretax 
earnings reaching a record high of $32.9 million. 
However, the tax reform package enacted at the 
end of 2017 required the remeasurement of tax 
deferred assets, which led to a reduction in net 
income. Without the remeasurement, our net 
income would have been $20.0 million for the year, 
or $1.43 per share. After the required adjustments, 
Alerus recognized a one-time charge of $4.6 million, 
reducing net income to $15.4 million, or $1.10 per 
share. Though tax reform negatively impacted 
earnings in 2017, we believe, as do many industry 
watchers, that the new, lower corporate tax rate and 
other features of the new tax law will strengthen 
future earnings.

In summary, 2017 was a year of 
real prog ress for Ale rus and 
for our stockholde rs . 

We continue to engage with the institutional 
investor community, tell the story of our 
company, and generate interest in the stock. 
As a company we make calculated choices 
about how best to conduct business, and 
stockholder value will always be a pivotal 
factor in those calculations.

2017 marked 20 years since the city of Grand 
Forks, North Dakota — including our company 
headquarters — was ravaged by fl ood and fi re. The 
events of April 1997 are forever etched into the 
memory of the community and the history of Alerus. 
The fl ood and fi re, which destroyed our facility and 
nearly all of our records, could have been the end of 
our company. Instead it became an infl ection point, 
a springboard into a period of reinvention, expansion, 
and growth that is still in motion today. Since 1997, 
company revenue has increased from $31.2 million 
to $171.1 million, and our market capitalization has 
increased to more than $280 million. During that 
time, our common equity has increased from $45.7 
million to $180.6 million, our average return on 
assets (ROA) is 1.16 percent, and our average return 
on equity (ROE) is 10.79 percent. Our stock price was 
$3.67 on April 17, 1997, the day the river crested in 
Grand Forks. At the end of 2017, our stock traded at 
over $20 a share. We are proud of our performance 
and the value we have delivered to stockholders 
since that pivotal point in our history.

As our company’s profi  le increases and as we 
contemplate future growth, we continue pursuing 
ways for stockholders to realize the full value 
of their investment in Alerus. To further increase 
our visibility with current and future investors, 
we launched a new investor relations website 
in April 2017, designed to provide easier access 
to information about our company. The site, 
available at investors.alerus.com, provides a 
host of information including detailed financial 
data, stock price data, investment calculators, 
and more. The site serves as a useful tool for 
anyone interested in learning more about Alerus 
and what we have to offer investors.

*Data only available since 19 69.

Asset Growth (IN BILLIONS)

Dividends and Earnings per Share   

Retirement Assets

Dividends Per Share (DPS)

$12.9

$15.5

2013

2014

$17.5

2015

$25.0

2016

$28.2

2017

$0.50

$0.45

$0.40

$0.35

$0.30

Wealth Management Assets

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Earnings Per Common Share (EPS)

$2.4

2013

$2.6

2014

$2.7

2015

$3.4

2016

$3.8

2017

Banking Assets

$1.4

2013

$1.5

2014

$1.7

2015

$2.1

2016

$2.1

2017

$1.50

$1.25

$1.00

$0.75

$0.50

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Stockholder Total Return 
(% CUMULATIVE)

ALRS + 122.25%

SNL U.S. Financial Services + 109.29% 

S&P 500 + 102.95%

200

150

100

50

0

Stockholder Value   

Year-End Stock Price

$25.00

$20.00

$15.00

$10.00

$5.00

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Book Value Per Share

$25.00

$20.00

$15.00

$10.00

$5.00

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

9

Financial Performance

Strong Client Growth

Reported net income of $15.4 million,  
up 10.1% from 2016.

Cash dividends per share increased 9.1%  
from $0.44 per share to $0.48 per share.

Diluted earnings per share of $1.10,  
up 10.0% from 2016.

Total loans grew $207.5 million  
to $1.57 billion from 2016.

Total deposits grew $49.8 million  
to $1.83 billion from 2016.

Total assets under administration grew  
$3.2 billion to $28.2 billion from 2016.

Return on average (ROA) assets of 0.77%,  
up 4 basis points from 2016.

Total assets under management grew  
$468 million to $3.8 billion from 2016.

Return on equity (ROE) of 8.74%,  
up 45 basis points from 2016.

Return on tangible common equity (ROTCE)  
of 14.30%, down from 14.88% in 2016.

Company revenue of $171.1 million,  
up 2.4% from 2016.

Business line revenue of $176.8 million,  
up 3.0% from 2016.

•  Banking division revenue of $77.6 million,  

up 7.9% from 2016.

•  Mortgage division revenue of $22.1 million, 

down 21.6% from 2016.

•  Retirement and benefits division revenue  

of $62.4 million, up 7.9% from 2016.

•  Wealth management division revenue  

of $14.7 million, up 7.6% from 2016.

Continued Strong Credit Quality

Total nonperforming assets decreased $3.2 
million or 33.7% from the fourth quarter of 2016; 
nonperforming assets to total loans plus other 
nonperforming assets equaled 0.4% at year-end 
2017 compared to 0.7% at year-end 2016.

Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming  
loans was 282% at year-end 2017, compared  
to 204% at year-end 2016.

Company Developments 

Reorganized executive management as part  
of an organizational recommitment to our  
client-centric strategies.

Executed the transfer to Alerus of $92 million in 
health savings account deposits previously held by 
an outside custodian following 2016’s acquisition 
of Alliance Benefit Group North Central States, Inc. 

Consolidated and remodeled multiple office 
locations to better utilize space and support 
additional staff expansion.

Launched a new investor relations website to 
provide increased access to company information 
for current and prospective stockholders. 

Maintained Strong Capital   
Ratios, Year-End 2017

Common equity tier 1 ratio of 7.83%.

Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.29%.

Total risk-based capital ratio of 12.17%.

Tier 1 leverage ratio of 7.07%.

Client Enhancements 

Launched mobile wallet capability making  
Alerus debit and credit cards usable with Apple 
Pay® and Samsung Pay®.

Introduced CardValet® fraud mitigation and 
management tool to enhance debit card security.

Introduced simplified online account access for 
retirement and health and welfare account holders.

Added online loan statement capability for 
business banking clients. 

Introduced same-day ACH capability within 
business online banking.

11

A C C O M PA N Y I N G   C L I E N T S   O N   T H E I R 

F I N A N C I A L   J O U R N E Y S   I S   A   P R I V I L E G E 

T H AT   W E   N E V E R   TA K E   L I G H T LY.

T H E   D E F I N I N G   A S P E C T   O F   T H E   A L E R U S 

C U L T U R E   I S   T H E   C L I E N T - F O C U S E D   A P P R O A C H 

W E   T A K E   T O   A L L   A S P E C T S   O F   O U R   B U S I N E S S .

Evolving With Clients

One important feature of One Alerus is an even 
sharper focus on client-centricity, particularly 
in light of today’s fast-moving technology and 
the attendant need to deliver products, services, 
and information on clients’ terms. Personal 
relationships defi  ne our service approach. We 
work with clients when, where, and how they 
want to be served. For many, it’s face to face, but 
today’s clients increasingly seek to engage through 
websites and mobile apps. Across the industry 
and among our own client base, we’re seeing 
meaningful growth in the demand for digitally 
enabled engagement supported by a personal 
relationship, and we expect this trend to continue.

In 2017 we took a number of steps to position Alerus 
as a valuable resource for clients, both through 
technological enhancements and through the 
alignment and development of employees. We 
partnered with a leading financial technology 
company to begin work on a powerful new online 
account portal that we will introduce over the 
coming year. Further, we began working with 
perhaps the world’s premier client relationship 
management software provider to create a platform 
that will allow our interactions with clients to be 
more effective, meaningful, and timely. 

We were pleased to launch a number of new and 
upgraded services to help clients manage their 
day-to-day fi  nancial needs. We added our debit 
and credit cards to Apple Pay® and Samsung 
Pay™, empowering cardholders to pay quickly and 
easily with their phones. We introduced CardValet®, 
a mobile app that adds another layer of security for 
personal and business debit card users. Business 
banking clients can now take advantage of same-
day ACH service, making their transactions quicker 
and more effi cient. And we simplifi ed the login 
experience for hundreds of thousands of retirement 
plan and health savings plan participants. These 
enhancements are both practical and quietly 
transformative, because they allow clients to 
accomplish their tasks more effi ciently and safely. 

Our organizational model — Alerus as a 
high-value professional services company 
delivering solutions in the context of a 
real relationship — is about continually 
fi  nding ways to do things more effectively.

Redefining Client Experience

Alerus is a diverse fi  nancial services company, able 
to offer a range of solutions and advice that few 
institutions our size can match. The challenge is to 
deliver our services cohesively, in ways clients prefer. 
Our One Alerus strategy seeks to meet this test not 
only through technology, but through positioning 
employees to deliver advice and guidance that 
improves our clients’ financial well-being. 

This year we focused on defi ning a service paradigm, 
centered on advice, designed to provide more than 
the checking accounts, cash management tools, 
or retirement services that may have fi  rst spurred 
someone to become a client. We are positioned to 
add value by providing access to a skilled advisor, 
someone who can provide guidance on growing a 
business, securing a comfortable retirement, or any 
number of other fi nancial goals a client may wish to 
reach. We are excited to provide more details about 
this direction in the future.

For Company Success, 
Focus on the Client

A business can focus on a host of different things, 
and to varying degrees at different times. Some 
focus on competitors, some on technology, some 
on business models — the list goes on. But at 
Alerus, we believe the key to success is a clear, 
unwavering focus on clients. Our advisors are 
the personification of this belief.

Trusted financial advisors deeply understand 
their clients, build relationships, and help them 
identify their goals — both business and personal. 
Alerus is driven to create remarkable experiences 
that add value to client relationships. Ultimately, 
those relationships drive company growth and 
stockholder value.

13

OU R   E M P L OY E E S   A N D   T H E I R 

COM M I TM EN T TO EXCEL L ENCE A R E T H E 

R EA L DR I V I NG FORCE OF OU R SUCCESS.

T E C H N O L O G Y   A L O N E   C A N N O T   D E L I V E R   A 

S T E L L A R   C L I E N T   E X P E R I E N C E ;   I T   I S   W H AT   W E 

D O ,   H O W   W E   D O   I T ,   A N D   W H O   D O E S   I T   T H AT 

H E L P S   U S   S TA N D   O U T   F R O M   T H E   C R O W D .

Reshaping Ourselves

Impacting Our Communities

Working effectively as One Alerus means bringing 
together a powerful combination of technology and 
people to better serve clients. On the people side of 
the equation, 2017 was a year of organizing ourselves 
in a way that maximizes employees’ ability to 
focus on clients. We began by realigning executive 
management and making sure the right leaders were 
put in the right places. As a result, we have seen an 
even sharper focus on our mission and values, and 
we are pursuing our goals with renewed vigor.

Organizational changes took place throughout the 
company as the year progressed. For example, we 
began working to combine our two customer service 
call centers into a single unit that will be capable 
of handling a wider variety of client inquiries and 
requests. We also combined our information 
technology and project management areas in order 
to boost effi ciency and streamline processes. Similar 
actions took place across Alerus and will continue 
as we seek to empower our employees with the 
resources they need to perform at their best.

Developing Leaders

Discovering and nurturing talent is and will 
remain a priority for our company. We believe 
well defi  ned paths to leadership roles for highly 
skilled employees help us remain an employer of 
choice in a competitive marketplace. The Alerus 
Leadership Council, a cross-functional collection 
of new and established leaders, is one example of 
such a path. Formed in 2017, this highly collaborative 
group meets regularly to bring forth fresh ideas 
and recommendations as to how we can improve 
the overall client experience, help employees 
accomplish their work, and ultimately deliver 
more stockholder value. 

We have built our company on the basis of strategic 
planning for many decades. We believe a similar 
approach will continue to apply to the evolution 
of company leadership. Careful evaluation and 
planning is continually undertaken to ensure that 
the next generation of board members, executives, 
and other leaders fi ts in with the culture we have 
created, while at the same time allowing these new 
additions to apply their own experiences, skills, 
and voices to make Alerus an even better fi nancial 
services company.

Alerus is powerful not only because of the 
fi  nancial tools and guidance we provide, but also 
because of the collective contributions we make 
to the communities in which we live and work. 
In 2017, Alerus donated approximately $1.4 million 
to a wide range of difference-making organizations 
in the communities we serve, including local 
chambers of commerce, numerous high schools, 
many arts and cultural programs, and a variety 
of food shelves. It is a privilege to contribute to 
many types of organizations that do so much to 
improve the quality of life of so many people and 
strengthen the foundation of our communities.

In addition to fi nancial contributions, Alerus donates 
thousands of hours each year through our employee 
volunteerism program. Each employee receives paid 
time off to volunteer in support of the causes and 
organizations that they hold dear. The impact our 
employees make in their own communities is as 
admirable as it is tangible. Moreover, we believe that 
offering this type of opportunity helps make Alerus 
a great place to work, helping us attract and retain 
talent and making us an employer of choice.

Welcoming 
Our New CFO

Please welcome our 
new chief fi  nancial 
offi  cer, Katie Lorenson, 
who joined Alerus 
in December. 

Ms. Lorenson has held leadership roles at 
several fi  nancial institutions during her 
career, playing a key role in driving growth 
and progress. With a deep background in 
fi  nance, investor relations, capital planning, 
and market analysis, Ms. Lorenson is an ideal 
fi t for our company as we move forward.

15

O P E R A T I N G   A S   O N E   A L E R U S 

M E A N S   R E F I N I N G   O U R   T E A M S 

A N D   P R O C E S S E S ,   A N D   B U I L D I N G 

A N D   R E I N F O R C I N G   O U R 

I N F R A S T R U C T U R E .

I T   A L S O   M E A N S   E N H A N C I N G   O U R 

E M P L O Y E E S ’   A B I L I T Y   T O   W O R K   E F F E C T I V E LY , 

A L L   F O R   T H E   B E N E F I T   O F   C L I E N T S . 

Cybersecurity Remains 
a Major Focus

Continuing a years-long trend, 2017 saw a series 
of large data breaches at major entities, public and 
private, reinforcing the need for vigilance when 
it comes to security in today’s tech-driven world. 
Cybercriminals successfully obtained data ranging 
from Social Security numbers to purchase histories, 
shining a light on the vulnerable nature of much 
sensitive information. 

Information security is an operational risk for 
all fi  nancial institutions, which continue to be 
targets of various evolving and adaptive cyber 
attacks, including malware and denial of service, 
as part of elaborate efforts to disrupt operations, 
test a company’s cybersecurity capabilities, or 
obtain sensitive information about clients 
and companies. 

Addressing cybersecurity risks is a priority for 
Alerus, and we continue to develop and enhance 
our controls, processes, and systems in order to 
protect our networks, computers, software, and data 
from attack, damage, or unauthorized access. We 
are also proactively involved in working with others, 
such as our third-party service providers, to continue 
to heighten defenses and improve resiliency to 
cybersecurity threats. 

Efficiency and Effectiveness

Working together as One Alerus requires effective 
communication with each other and with clients. 
To improve our day-to-day interactions internally, 
we moved to the Microsoft Outlook email platform, 
upgraded to Cisco’s WebEx collaboration and 
conferencing tools, and continued to expand our 
corporate intranet. To improve interactions with 
clients, we invested in a new, world-class customer 
relationship management tool, or CRM, that we 
will implement in 2018. This powerful platform 
will facilitate better relationships by tracking 
touchpoints and helping us deliver the right 
solution at the right time. 

Process improvements also play a role in making 
us more efficient and effective. One example 
was our engagement with a leading fi  nance and 
technology consulting fi  rm to improve processes 
in our retirement division. Our retirement area 
grew rapidly through many acquisitions over 
the previous decade, which led to a number of 
challenging and complex processes. Over the 
course of 18 months, we streamlined operations 
within the retirement area and positioned ourselves 
to work better today and to grow in the future.  

Positioned to Deliver

From security to communication, from reporting to technology, the investments we make in operational 
enhancements enable our entire company to focus on the right things: growing client relationships the 
right way; further differentiating Alerus in a competitive marketplace; putting our employees in positions 
to meet client needs; and, finally, enhancing our ability to deliver through high-touch, personal service 
backed by strong technology.

As we plan for the future, our focus is on optimizing our operations to achieve more 
effi ciencies and improve delivery to clients. Everything from hardware and servers to 
project management systems to teams of employees will be fi  ne-tuned. This is an open-
ended process that demands continued attention and revision in response to competitive 
pressures, rising client expectations, and rapid industry change.

17

L O O K I N G   T O   T H E   F U T U R E .

The need for thoughtful fi  nancial advice is growing. The 
ways in which that advice is consumed will continue to 
evolve, and not necessarily in a single direction. Today’s 
financial clients, whether they are business owners or 
everyday consumers, are expressing a desire for more 
digital and technological interaction, but at the same time 
they are voicing their need for fi  nancial advice provided 
by professionals, in person. 

Creating business models and solutions that meet these 
seemingly disparate preferences is not easy, but it is very 
much worth doing. The entire fi  nancial industry continues 
to remake itself by becoming more strategic about all 
aspects of their services and how they are provided. Across 
the country, 2,122 physical bank branches were closed in 
2017, largely a product of clients’ digital preferences along 
with a long-term trend toward industry consolidation. 

For Alerus, the drive toward a combined personal and digital 
client experience is both welcomed and expected. Thanks 
to careful, forward-thinking strategic planning, we have in 
place a business model designed to meet client needs and to 
adapt to changing preferences. Clients are at the core of what 
we do, and the investments we make are designed to make 
us more effective at meeting them on their terms, and with 
as little friction as possible. We look forward to many years 
of building relationships, delivering stockholder value, and 
making a difference in our clients’ lives.

W E   R E M A I N   C O M M I T T E D   T O 

S E N S I B L E   F R A N C H I S E   G R O W T H , 

S T R A T E G I C A L L Y   I N V E S T I N G   F O R 

T H E   F U T U R E ,   A N D   D E L I V E R I N G 

S T O C K H O L D E R   V A L U E . 

2 0 1 7   W A S   A   Y E A R   T H A T   R E S H A P E D   O U R 

C O M P A N Y   I N   M A N Y   W A Y S .   O U R   S T R O N G 

P E R F O R M A N C E   A N D   T H O U G H T F U L   P L A N N I N G 

A L L O W E D   U S   T O   C O M E   T O G E T H E R   A S   O N E 

A L E R U S   A N D   U N I T E   B E H I N D   T H E   C O N C E P T 

O F   C L I E N T   E X P E R I E N C E .   W E   A R E   W E L L 

P O S I T I O N E D   T O   M E E T   T H E   G R O W I N G   T R E N D 

T O W A R D   C O M P R E H E N S I V E   F I N A N C I A L   A D V I C E 

A N D   T O   T A K E   A D V A N T A G E   O F   O P P O R T U N I T I E S 

T H A T   P R E S E N T   T H E M S E LV E S   I N   A N   E V E R -

E V O LV I N G   I N D U S T R Y   E N V I R O N M E N T . 

19

A L ERUS L E A DERSH I P.

Senior Executive Team

Randy L . Newman
Chairman, President, and 
Chief Executive Offi cer

Kris Compton
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Strategy Offi cer

Dan J. Cheever
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Development Offi cer

37 years with Alerus

43 years with Alerus

3 years with Alerus

Ann McConn
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Business Offi cer

Katie Lorenson
Executive Vice President and 
Chief Financial Offi cer

16 years with Alerus

Joined Alerus in 2017

Karl Bollingberg
Director of Lending
31 years with Alerus

Lori Day
Director of Mortgage
Joined Alerus in 2018

Scott Fenske
Ex Offi cio
General Counsel and 
Corporate Secretary
2 years with Alerus

Jon Hendry
Chief Information Offi cer
34 years with Alerus

ALERUS LEADERSHIP COUNCIL

Travis Ingebrigtson
Manager of Financial 
Planning and Analysis
3 years with Alerus

Chad Johnson, CPA
Ex Offi cio
Director of Internal Audit
15 years with Alerus

Missy Keney
Director of Marketing and 
Customer Experience
13 years with Alerus

Karna Loyland 
Director of Deposits
19 years with Alerus

Chip Norris
Group President, Director 
of Sales and Service
11 years with Alerus

Brian Overby 
President of Retirement 
and Benefi ts
23 years with Alerus

Brian Schumacher
Director of Wealth 
Management
7 years with Alerus

Teresa Wasvick 
Director of Human Resources
27 years with Alerus

Daniel E. Coughlin 
Chicago, IL 

Kevin D. Lemke  
Grand Forks, ND 

Board of Directors

Randy L. Newman
Grand Forks, ND 

Chairman, President, and 
Chief Executive Officer, 
Alerus Financial, N.A., Alerus 
Financial Corporation

Karen M. Bohn 
Edina, MN 

President, Galeo Group, LLC

Former Chief Administrative 
Officer, Piper Jaffray Companies

Former Managing Director and 
Co-Head of Financial Services, 
Raymond James & Associates

Former Chairman and CEO, 
Howe Barnes Hoefer & Arnett

Harold A. Gershman  
Grand Forks, ND 

President, Gershman 
Enterprises, LLC 

Former Chief Executive Officer, 
Piper Trust Company

President, Happy Harry’s  
Bottle Shops

Lloyd G. Case  
Fargo, ND 

James J. Karley 
Gilby, ND 

Past President and CEO of Forum 
Communications Company 

Board of Directors,  
Forum Communications

President, Johnstown Bean, 
Cavalier Bean Companies,  
and North Central Commodities

President, Virtual Systems, Inc. 

Sally Smith 
Minneapolis, MN 

Retired President and Chief 
Executive Officer, Buffalo  
Wild Wings, Inc. 

Galen G. Vetter  
Minneapolis, MN 

Former Global Chief Financial 
Officer, Franklin Templeton 
Investments 

Former Partner-in-Charge, Upper 
Midwest Region, McGladrey 

MARKET PRESIDENTS

Twin Cities Advisory Board

Chris Wolf, CPA, Grand Forks
8 years with Alerus

Hillary Feder
Hillary’s

Dan Doeden, Fargo
14 years with Alerus

Larry Gamst  
Franklin Partners, Inc.

Sara Ausman, Twin Cities
6 years with Alerus 

Julie Gilbert  
PreciouStatus

Deb Otto, Duluth
2 years with Alerus

Rob Schwister, Phoenix
8 years with Alerus

Larry Lautt
Great West Ventures, LLC

Lisa Meyer  
Marketing and  
Management Executive

Dennis Monroe  
Monroe Moxness Berg PA

James Nichols  
James L. Nichols CPA, LLC

Julie Tanaka
Compendium Capital Group
Compendium Business 
Strategies, LLC

21

A   H I S T O R Y   O F   G R O W T H .

1879 

1933 

1985 

1986 

1987 

1989 

1991 

Founded as the Bank of Grand Forks, one of the fi  rst chartered in the Dakota Territory.

First National Bank in Grand Forks opened its doors in Grand Forks, North Dakota.

Acquired Northwood State Bank in Northwood, North Dakota.

Created Employee Stock Ownership Plan for our employees.  

Entered the Fargo market by purchasing West Fargo State Bank 
in West Fargo, North Dakota.

Purchased Dakota Bank in Grand Forks, North Dakota.

First National Bank in Grand Forks purchased the North Dakota branches 
of First Federal Savings & Loan in Fargo, North Dakota, and changed its name 
to First National Bank North Dakota.

1997 

Historic fl ood and fi  re devastated Grand Forks and First National Bank 
North Dakota’s buildings. 

2000 

First National Bank North Dakota changed its name to Alerus Financial to refl ect 
the evolution from a traditional bank to a diversifi ed fi  nancial services company.

2002 

2003 

2006 

2007 

2009 

2011 

2012 

2013 

2014 

2015 

2016 

Acquired a branch of BNC National Bank in Fargo, North Dakota.

Purchased Pension Solutions, Inc., a retirement plan services company 
located in St. Paul, Minnesota.

Opened a trust and investment offi ce in the Twin Cities; purchased 
Stanton Trust Company in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Opened a business banking offi ce in Minnetonka, Minnesota; purchased the 
retirement recordkeeping services unit of Acclaim Benefi ts, Inc. in Minneapolis, 
Minnesota; acquired Stanton Investment Advisors, Inc., a Minneapolis-based 
investment advisory fi  rm.

Expanded into Phoenix, Arizona; purchased the retirement plan practice of 
Eide Bailly, LLP in Minneapolis, Minnesota; acquired deposits from BankFirst in 
Minneapolis, Minnesota; acquired Prosperan Bank in Oakdale, Maplewood, and 
Minnetonka, Minnesota; acquired Residential Mortgage Group in Minnetonka 
and Arden Hills, Minnesota.

Acquired a branch in Arizona and selected loans and deposits in Minnesota 
and Arizona from BNC National Bank in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Purchased PensionTrend Inc., and PensionTrend Investment Advisers, LLC, 
in Okemos, Michigan.

Purchased Tegrit Administrators, LLC.

Purchased Private Bank Minnesota in Minneapolis, Minnesota; purchased 
Retirement Alliance, Inc., in Manchester, New Hampshire.

Purchased Interactive Retirement Systems, LTD, in Bloomington, Minnesota.

Purchased Beacon Bank in Shorewood, Excelsior, Eden Prairie, and Duluth, 
Minnesota; purchased Alliance Benefi t Group North Central States, Inc., in 
Albert Lea and Eden Prairie, Minnesota. 

BANKING :: MORTGAGE :: RETIREMENT :: WEALTH MANAGEMENT

MEMBER FDIC  :: ©2018 ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPOR ATION :: 800. 279.3200 :: ALERUS .COM

2 0 1 7   A N N U A L   F I N A N C I A L   R E P O R T

F I N A N C I A L   R E P O R T

TABLE 1 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Year ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Income Statement Data
Interest income
Interest expense

Net interest income
Provision for loan losses

Net interest income, after provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense

Income before income taxes
Income tax expense

Net income

Diluted earnings per common share

Performance Ratios
Net interest margin
Return on average total assets
Return on average common equity
Return on average tangible common equity
Efficiency ratio

Balance Sheet Data
Cash and due from banks
Investment securities
Loans held for sale
Loans
Allowance for loan losses
Goodwill
Other intangible assets
Total assets
Deposits
Long-term debt
Total liabilities
Common stockholders’ equity
Total stockholders’ equity

Capital
Common equity tier 1
Tier 1 capital
Total capital
Tier 1 leverage
Tangible common equity / tangible assets

Asset Quality
Nonperforming assets
OREO
Nonperforming assets / loans and other real estate
Net (charge-offs) recoveries / average total loans
Allowance for loan losses / total loans
Allowance for loan losses / nonperforming loans

Other
Assets under management
Assets under administration
Mortgage originations

2017
______________________

2016
______________________

2015
______________________

2014
_____________________

2013
______________________

$

75,637
7,967
______________________
67,670
3,280
______________________
64,390
103,459
134,920
______________________
32,929
17,485
______________________
$
15,444
______________________
______________________
1.10
$

$

69,942
7,002
______________________
62,940
3,060
______________________
59,880
105,081
143,792
______________________
21,169
7,138
______________________
$
14,031
______________________
______________________
1.00
$

$

56,328
3,458
______________________
52,870
4,200
______________________
48,670
93,255
118,134
______________________
23,791
6,683
______________________
$
17,108
______________________
______________________
1.21
$

$

54,394
3,316
_______________________
51,078
(400)
_______________________
51,478
78,406
100,115
_______________________
29,769
8,999
_______________________
$
20,770
_______________________
_______________________
1.48
$

$

50,510
3,712
______________________
46,798
1,200
______________________
45,598
79,269
92,913
______________________
31,954
11,417
______________________
$
20,537
______________________
______________________
1.48
$

3.76%
0.77%
8.74%
14.30%
78.84%

3.63%
0.73%
8.29%
14.88%
85.50%

3.81%
1.12%
10.51%
13.41%
80.84%

3.97%
1.45%
14.26%
17.11%
77.32%

3.94%
1.57%
15.60%
18.23%
73.70%

121,998
274,411
17,938
1,574,474
(16,564)
27,329
31,797
2,137,058
1,834,962
58,819
1,956,487
180,571
180,571

$

207,367
278,911
35,063
1,366,952
(15,615)
27,329
37,506
2,050,579
1,785,209
58,813
1,881,794
168,785
168,785

$

266,159
192,343
48,642
1,126,921
(14,688)
3,683
21,751
1,744,863
1,458,021
70,744
1,562,042
162,821
182,821

$

45,526
206,101
35,042
1,095,458
(17,063)
3,264
22,442
1,487,732
1,262,168
21,494
1,316,646
151,086
171,086

$

72,544
279,672
30,254
914,564
(16,838)
664
15,014
1,381,727
1,182,603
21,630
1,228,416
133,311
153,311

7.8%
8.3%
12.2%
7.1%
6.1%

7.7%
8.2%
12.3%
6.9%
5.5%

10.9%
12.3%
17.0%
10.9%
8.2%

N/A
11.8%
13.0%
10.1%
8.8%

N/A
12.8%
14.1%
10.6%
8.8%

$

6,356
446
0.40%
0.16%
1.05%
282.04%

9,581
1,721
0.70%
0.16%
1.14%
203.74%

$

$

12,028
842
1.07%
0.58%
1.30%
131.72%

$

6,484
2,478

0.59%
-0.06%
1.56%
427.11%

10,265
4,877

1.12%
-0.06%
1.84%
313.15%

$

$

$ 3,848,085
28,220,246
867,253

$ 3,379,787
25,028,090
1,065,132

$ 2,734,850
17,459,308
986,979

$ 2,583,808
15,518,303
729,913

$ 2,424,642
12,860,780
1,028,208

2

ABOUT ALERUS FI NANCIAL CORPORATION

Alerus Financial Corporation (the “Company”) is a
diversified financial services company with $2.1 billion
in banking assets, $3.8 billion of assets under management
and $28.2 billion of assets under administration. The
Company, through its subsidiaries Alerus Financial, N.A.
(the “Bank”) and Alerus Securities Corporation, offers
business and consumer banking products and services,
residential mortgage financing, wealth management
services including trust, brokerage, executive insurance,
and asset management, and employer-sponsored
retirement plan administration and employer sponsored
services including payroll, health savings accounts, flexible
spending accounts, health reimbursement arrangements,
and COBRA administration. The Company’s banking and
wealth management offices are located in Grand Forks and
Fargo, North Dakota, the Minneapolis-St. Paul and Duluth,
Minnesota metropolitan areas, and Scottsdale, Arizona.
Alerus Retirement and Benefits administers plans in all 50
states through offices located in St. Paul and Albert Lea,
Minnesota, East Lansing and Troy, Michigan, and Bedford,
New Hampshire. The common stock of the Company trades
on the OTCQX market under the symbol ALRS.

RECENT EVENTS

ACQUISITIONS

During the two years ended December 31, 2017, the
Company completed the following acquisitions:

Beacon Bank

On January 15, 2016, the Company acquired Beacon Bank
and its five branches, three located in the southwestern
suburbs of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and two in Duluth,
Minnesota. The Company assumed $327.4 million of
deposits and other liabilities, including $10.0 million of
trust preferred securities, and purchased $350.6 million
in cash, securities, loans, and other assets. As part of the
transaction, the Company allocated $18.8 million to
goodwill and $3.8 million to a core deposit intangible.
The core deposit intangible is being amortized over the
estimated life of five years, resulting in an annualized
intangible amortization expense of $759 thousand, while
the goodwill is not subject to amortization.

Alliance Benefit Group North Central States, Inc.
(ABGNCS)

On January 1, 2016, the Company acquired Alliance Benefit
Group North Central States, Inc. (ABGNCS), with locations
in Albert Lea and Eden Prairie, Minnesota. The purchase,
consisting of approximately 900 retirement plans with
more than 75,000 retirement participants, grew the
Company’s retirement division by $6.0 billion in retirement

and individual asset managed accounts. As part of the
transaction, $4.8 million was allocated to goodwill and
$17.9 million to an identified customer intangible, based
on the estimated value as of the acquisition date. The
identified customer intangible is being amortized over the
estimated life of ten years, resulting in an annualized
intangible amortization expense of $1.8 million, while the
goodwill is not subject to amortization.

SMALL BUSINESS LENDING FUND
PREFERRED STOCK

On February 16, 2016, Alerus redeemed $20.0 million of
Small Business Lending Fund (SBLF) preferred stock, which
had been outstanding since August 8, 2011. The SBLF had a
dividend rate of 1.0 percent that was scheduled to reset to
9.0 percent on February 18, 2016. The SBLF qualified as Tier 1
capital for regulatory purposes.

OFFICE CONSOLIDATIONS

In August 2016, the Company announced the closure and
consolidation of three branch offices, two in Fargo, North
Dakota, and one in Maplewood, Minnesota, effective
November 23, 2016. The loans and deposits of the offices
were consolidated into other Bank offices within close
proximity in those markets. The cost of closing these
facilities was $1.5 million and was recorded in 2016, with
an additional $0.5 million of expenses relating to the sale
of one of the offices recorded in 2017. The Company has
continued to consolidate other facilities, either acquired
through acquisitions or leased by the Company, to reduce
operating expenses and improve efficiencies. During 2016,
the Company vacated three leased facilities, consolidating
operations units into other locations. In the first quarter
of 2017, two additional locations were also vacated as
leases expired.

INCOME TAXES

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. Government enacted the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) which reduced the corporate
income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The Company was
required to adjust the carrying value of deferred tax assets
and liabilities using the new tax rate, which will be effective
in 2018. This resulted in a charge to earnings in the fourth
quarter of 2017 of $4.6 million which is included in income
tax expense on the consolidated statements of income. The
lower income tax rate is expected to benefit the Company
in future periods. In June 2017, the Company recorded
additional income tax expense of $1.4 million related to the
impairment of a deferred tax asset recorded as part of the
Private Bank Minnesota acquisition in 2014. The recording
of these deferred tax charges increased the Company’s
effective tax rate to 53.1% in 2017 from 33.7% in 2016.

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 3

FI NANCIAL PERFORMANCE
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the significant changes
in the results of operations, capital resources, and liquidity presented in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company’s consolidated
balance sheet and income statement are comprised primarily of the financial
condition and results of operations of the Bank. Current performance does not
guarantee, and may not be indicative of, similar performance in the future. For
more information on the factors that could affect performance, see “Forward
Looking Statements.”

EARNINGS SUMMARY

Net income was $15.4 million or $1.10 diluted earnings per common share
in 2017, compared to $14.0 million or $1.00 diluted per share for 2016, and
$17.1 million or $1.21 diluted per share for 2015. The Company’s financial
performance in 2017 includes the recording of $6.0 million additional income tax
expense related to deferred tax assets, $4.6 million related to the re-measurement
of the deferred tax assets as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and
$1.4 million related to the Private Bank Minnesota acquisition in 2014. Also in
2017, the Company incurred $1.6 million of nonrecurring professional fees related
to litigation and $0.5 million of additional expense related to branch closures. In
2016, the Company incurred $6.7 million of nonrecurring expenses as follows:
$4.0 million incurred in the acquisitions of ABGNCS and Beacon Bank, $1.5 million
related to the closure of three branch offices, $0.4 million for prepayment fees on
FHLB advances and $0.8 million of other expenses. The Company’s 2017 earnings
also reflect $5.6 million of amortization of identified intangibles from acquisitions,
which lower earnings per share, net of taxes, by $0.24, compared to $7.0 million or
$0.30 per share in 2016. The net income and earnings per share over the last five
years are illustrated in Charts A and B, respectively.

The Company reported record pretax earnings of $32.9 million in 2017, an
increase of $11.8 million, or 53.5% from the $21.2 million reported in 2016 and
the $23.8 million in 2015. The impact of the deferred tax charges set forth above,
and higher pretax earnings, increased the Company’s income tax expense from
$7.1 million in 2016 to $17.5 million in 2017, reducing reported net income to
$15.4 million.

Revenue, the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, was
$171.1 million in 2017, compared with $168.0 million in 2016, and $146.1 million
in 2015. The Company’s diversified revenue model continues to generate strong
core earnings, reflecting revenue growth in the banking, retirement and benefit,
and wealth management business lines, while mortgage revenues declined due to
lower volumes of originations and sales. The increase in revenue for 2017 was
primarily as a result of an increasing loan portfolio and increasing assets under
administration and assets under management. The increase in revenue for 2016
compared to 2015 was predominantly due to the acquisitions of Beacon Bank and
ABGNCS, and higher mortgage originations.

Net interest income was $67.7 million in 2017, representing 39.5% of revenue,
compared to $62.9 million, or 37.5% of revenue, in 2016, and $52.9 million, or 36.2%
of revenue, in 2015. The net interest income increase in 2017 was primarily due to
an increasing loan portfolio, while the increase in 2016 was the result of the
acquisition of Beacon Bank in January 2016.

Noninterest income was $103.5 million in 2017, representing 60.5% of revenue,
compared to $105.1 million or 62.5% of revenue in 2016, and $93.3 million, or
63.8% of revenue, in 2015. The decrease in noninterest income in 2017 was the
result of lower mortgage banking revenue, which decreased 26.8%, as a result of
lower origination production, lower sales, and retention of mortgage loans for
portfolio. Retirement and benefits and wealth management noninterest income
increased 7.7% and 11.8% respectively, as assets under administration and
management increased during the year.

Noninterest expense was $134.9 million in 2017, compared with $143.8 million in
2016, and $118.1 million in 2015. The decrease in noninterest expense in 2017,
compared to 2016, reflected lower personnel, occupancy, intangible amortization,
and other operating expenses, which were all higher in 2016 as a result of the
acquisitions of ABGNCS and Beacon Bank.

4

Chart A
Net Income

$20,537

$20,770

$17,108

$15,444

$14,031

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Chart B
Earnings Per Share

$1.48

$1.48

$1.21

$1.10

$1.00

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

$22,500

$20,000

$17,500

$15,000

$12,500

$10,000

$7,500

$5,000

$1.60

$1.40

$1.20

$1.00

$0.80

$0.60

Cash dividends per common share were $0.48 in 2017, compared to $0.44 in 2016,
and $0.42 in 2015. The growth in cash dividends per share over the last five years is
illustrated in Chart C.

Return on Average Common Equity (ROE) is net income stated as a percentage of
average common stockholders’ equity. ROE was 8.74% in 2017, compared to 8.29%
in 2016, and 10.51% in 2015, as further illustrated in Chart D. The average ROE over
the past five years is 11.48%.

Return on Average Assets (ROA) is net income stated as a percentage of average
total assets. As Chart E illustrates, ROA was 0.77% in 2017, compared to 0.73% in
2016, and 1.12% in 2015. The average ROA over the past five years is 1.13%.

NET INTEREST INCOME

Net interest income is the interest earned on investment securities, loans
(including yield-related loan fees) and other interest-earning assets minus the
interest paid for deposits, short-term borrowings, and long-term debt. Net interest
margin is the average yield on earning assets minus the average interest rate paid
for deposits and other sources of funding. Net interest income and net interest
margin are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis in Table 2 to consistently
reflect income from taxable and tax-exempt loans and securities based on a 35.5%
marginal income tax rate.

While the Company believes that it has the ability to increase net interest income
over time, net interest income and net interest margin in any one period can be
significantly affected by a variety of factors, including the mix and overall size of
our earning asset portfolio and the cost of funding those assets.

Interest income was $75.6 million in 2017, an increase of $5.7 million, or 8.1%,
from the $69.9 million reported in 2016 and the $56.3 million reported in 2015.
The increase in interest income for 2017, compared with 2016, was largely driven
by higher average loans outstanding, $1.48 billion versus $1.35 billion at a slightly
lower average yield: 4.62% versus 4.65%. Average earning assets increased to
$1.82 billion from $1.75 billion in 2016 and the average yield increased from
4.03% to 4.19%. The increase in interest income from 2015 to 2016 was due to
the acquisition of Beacon Bank, which increased both the loans outstanding and
average yield on the portfolio. Average earning assets increased by $350.5 million
to $1.75 billion in 2016; however the average yield decreased to 4.03% from 4.06%
in 2015, as a result of a larger investment portfolio at lower yields.

In 2017 the average interest bearing liabilities increased by $13.5 million to
$1.31 billion, with an average rate of 0.61%, as compared to 0.54% in 2016, as a
result of the increase in short-term borrowings utilized to fund growth in the loan
portfolio, prior to the conversion of $92.5 million of Health Savings Account (HSA)
deposits, in the fourth quarter of 2017. In the acquisition of ABGNCS, the Company
acquired an HSA administration business line, which included deposits that were
in the custody of another financial institution. These deposits were transferred to
the Company during the fourth quarter of 2017. Average noninterest bearing
deposits increased to $488.3 million in 2017, from $443.5 million in 2016.

Core deposits are an important low-cost source of funding and affect both net
interest income and net interest margin. Core deposits include noninterest-
bearing deposits, interest-bearing checking, certificates of deposit less than
$250 thousand, and money market savings deposits. Core deposits increased
to $1.81 billion at December 31, 2017, an increase of $57.1 million from the
$1.75 billion in 2016. Net interest margin was 3.76% in 2017, up 13 basis points
from 3.63% in 2016, and comparable to the 3.81% in 2015.

Chart F illustrates net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the past
five years.

Chart G illustrates net interest margin for the past five years.

Chart C
Dividends Per Share

$0.50

$0.45

$0.40

$0.35

$0.34

$0.38

$0.48

$0.44

$0.42

$0.30

$0.25

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Chart D
Return on Equity

16.00%

15.60%

14.26%

14.00%

12.00%

10.00%

8.00%

6.00%

1.70%

1.55%

1.40%

1.25%

1.10%

0.95%

0.80%

0.65%

0.50%

$70,000

$65,000

$60,000

$55,000

$50,000

$45,000

$40,000

$35,000

10.51%

8.30%

8.74%

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Chart E
Return on Assets

1.57%

1.45%

1.12%

0.73%

0.77%

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Chart F
Net Interest Income

$67,670

$62,940

$51,078

$52,870

$46,798

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Chart G
Net Interest Margin

4.20%

4.00%

3.94%

3.97%

3.80%

3.60%

3.40%

3.20%

3.00%

3.81%

3.76%

3.63%

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 5

Assets
Interest-bearing deposits
with banks
Federal funds sold
Investment securities (a)
Loans held for sale
Loans

` Commercial
` Commercial and industrial (a)
Real estate construction
`
Real estate mortgage
`
Farmland and agricultural
`

`

Total commercial(a)

Consumer

Real estate 1-4 family
first mortgage
Real estate 1-4 family
junior mortgage
Automobile
Other revolving and
installment

Total consumer

Total loans (a)

Total earning assets (a)
Cash and due from banks
Allowance for loan losses
Goodwill & other intangibles
Premises and equipment
Other assets

Total assets

TABLE 2 – AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND AVERAGE RATES
Year ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

Average
Balance

2017
Average
Rate

Average
Balance

2016
Average
Rate

Interest
_________________________________________________________________

Interest
_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________
Average
Balance
Interest
_________________________________________________________________

2015
Average
Rate

$

39,045
-
286,313
23,887

0.97% $
0.00%
2.52%
2.55%

379
-
6,459
609

$

84,667
654
279,992
39,583

0.51% $
0.15%
2.31%
2.91%

429
1
5,868
1,152

$

48,273
95
183,103
43,515

0.25% $
0.00%
2.69%
3.24%

123
-
4,474
1,409

449,901
44,492
418,275
46,413
_____________________
959,081

4.76% 21,314
5.04%
2,243
4.68% 19,592
4.47%
2,075
_________
________________
4.72% 45,224

444,637
39,423
364,134
50,375
_____________________
898,569

4.56% 20,268
5.06%
1,996
4.93% 17,958
2,109
4.19%
_________
_______________
4.71% 42,331

383,098
34,772
257,110
55,067
_____________________
730,047

4.58% 17,526
4.15%
1,442
4.65% 11,963
2,300
4.18%
_________
_________________
4.55% 33,231

243,655

4.29% 10,464

182,038

4.34%

7,899

155,137

4.42%

6,862

188,420
57,426

4.79%
3.29%

9,026
1,890

177,431
59,832

5.03%
3.06%

8,922
1,833

159,772
59,982

4.82%
2.92%

7,700
1,753

5.99%
1,586
________________
_________
4.45% 22,966
_________
________________
4.62% 68,190
_________
________________
4.19% 75,637

26,460
_____________________
515,961
_____________________
1,475,042
_____________________
1,824,287
26,190
(15,818)
61,843
22,929
81,611
_____________________
$ 2,001,042
_____________________
_____________________

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Savings, checking, and
money market deposits
Certificates of deposit
Short-term borrowings
Long-term debt

$ 956,563
219,164
72,445
58,803
_____________________

0.21% $ 2,035
1,485
0.68%
943
1.30%
5.96%
3,504
________________
_________

Total interest bearing
liabilities

Noninterest-bearing deposits
Other liabilities
Stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity

Net interest margin/income (a)

Interest rate spread (a)

1,306,975

0.61%
_________

7,967
________________

488,295
28,994
176,778
_____________________

$ 2,001,042
_____________________
_____________________

27,339
_____________________
446,640
_____________________
1,345,209
_____________________
1,750,105
28,186
(15,937)
64,111
25,519
82,211
_____________________
$1,934,195
_____________________
_____________________

$ 971,979
251,359
5,059
65,102
_____________________

1,293,499

443,453
28,501
168,742
_____________________

$1,934,195
_____________________
_____________________

3.95%
776
_________________
_________
4.33% 17,091
_________
_________________
4.48% 50,322
_________
_________________
4.06% 56,328

5.51%
1,507
_______________
_________
4.51% 20,161
_________
_______________
4.65% 62,492
_________
_______________
4.03% 69,942

19,663
_____________________
394,554
_____________________
1,124,601
_____________________
1,399,587
23,676
(17,218)
28,093
21,375
77,884
_____________________
$1,533,397
_____________________
_____________________

0.18% $ 1,767
1,618
0.64%
21
0.42%
3,596
5.52%
_______________
_________

$ 743,237
225,096
12,599
23,480
_____________________

0.15% $ 1,106
1,652
0.73%
32
0.25%
2.84%
668
_________________
_________

0.54%
_________

7,002
_______________

1,004,412

0.34%
_________

3,458
_________________

327,654
20,400
180,931
_____________________

$1,533,397
_____________________
_____________________

3.76% $ 67,670
________________
_________
_________
________________
3.58%

3.62% $ 62,940
_______________
_________
_________
_______________
3.49%

3.81% $52,870
_________________
_________
_________
_________________
3.71%

(a) Taxable equivalent adjustment was calculated utilizing a marginal income tax rate of 35.5 percent

The Company manages the balance sheet to be interest
rate neutral to slightly asset sensitive, defined as allowing
assets on the balance sheet to reprice faster than the
liabilities that fund them. Financial institutions will feel
additional pressure on net interest margin the longer
short-term rates remain at lower levels since there is
limited opportunity to reprice deposits and fixed-rate loans
mature or renew at lower rates. The Company actively
implements risk management strategies as detailed in the
“Interest Rate Risk” discussion to minimize the effects of
interest rate volatility.

6

Table 2 presents detailed information as to average
balances, interest income and expense, and rates earned
and paid by major balance sheet categories for the years
2015 through 2017. Table 3 provides an analysis of the
change in net interest income that is attributable to
changes in volume of interest-earning assets or interest-
bearing liabilities, and to changes in rates earned and paid.

TABLE 3 – VOLUME AND RATE VARIANCE ANALYSIS
Year ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)

Year 2017 to 2016 Change Due to
_________________________________________
Volume
_________________________________________

Total

Rate

Interest income
Interest bearing deposits
with banks
Federal funds sold
Investment securities
Loans held for sale

Loans
Commercial
Commercial and industrial
Real estate construction
Real estate mortgage
Farmland and agricultural

Total commercial

Consumer
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
Real estate 1-4 family junior mortgage
Automobile
Other revolving and installment

Total consumer

Total loans

Total interest income

Interest expense
Savings, checking, and money
market deposits
Certificates of deposit
Short term borrowings
Long term debt

Total interest expense

Increase (decrease) in
net interest income

$

(231)
(1)
146
(457)

240
257
2,670
(166)
_______________
3,001

2,674
553
(74)
(48)
_______________
3,105
_______________
6,106
_______________
5,563
_______________

(28)
(207)
280
(348)
_______________
(303)
_______________

$ 5,866
_______________
_______________

Year 2016 to 2015 Change due to
_______________________________________
Total
Volume
_______________________________________

Rate

$

93
-
2,602
(127)

$

213
1
(1,208)
(130)

$

306
1
1,394
(257)

2,819
193
4,980
(196)
_______________
7,796

1,190
851
(4)
303
_______________
2,340
_______________
10,136
_______________
12,704
_______________

340
193
(19)
1,184
_______________
1,698
_______________

(77)
361
1,015
5
_______________
1,304

(153)
371
84
428
_______________
730
_______________
2,034
_______________
910
_______________

321
(227)
8
1,744
_______________
1,846
_______________

2,742
554
5,995
(191)
_________________
9,100

1,037
1,222
80
731
_________________
3,070
_________________
12,170
_________________
13,614
_________________

661
(34)
(11)
2,928
_________________
3,544
_________________

$

181
-
445
(86)

806
(10)
(1,036)
132
_______________
(108)

(109)
(449)
131
127
_______________
(300)
_______________
(408)
_______________
132
_______________

296
74
642
256
_______________
1,268
_______________

$

(50)
(1)
591
(543)

1,046
247
1,634
(34)
_____________
2,893

2,565
104
57
79
_____________
2,805
_____________
5,698
_____________
5,695
_____________

268
(133)
922
(92)
_____________
965
_____________

$ (1,136)
_______________
_______________

$ 4,730
_____________
_____________

$11,006
_______________
_______________

$ (936)
_______________
_______________

$10,070
_________________
_________________

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES

The allowance for loan losses (allowance) is an estimate
of losses inherent in the Company’s loan portfolios and is
established through a regular provision for loan losses
(provision) based on historical losses incurred on similar
pools of loans and periodic analysis of the portfolios’ credit
quality, as well as economic and business conditions.
Provisions are expected in order to maintain the adequacy
of the total allowance after loan losses and recoveries, loan
growth, and changes in management’s assessment of credit
quality and estimates of probable loan losses. Loan losses
are charged-off against the allowance when the Company
determines the loan balance to be uncollectible. Cash
received on previously charged-off amounts is recorded as
a recovery to the allowance. Annual fluctuations in the
provision result from management’s regular assessment
of the adequacy of the allowance based on the factors
described above.

The provision for 2017 was $3.3 million compared to
$3.1 million during 2016, increasing the allowance from
$15.6 million in 2016 to $16.6 million in 2017, net of

charges to the allowance. Asset quality has continued to
improve, with nonperforming assets decreasing from
$9.6 million at December 31, 2016, to $6.4 million at
December 31, 2017. The ratio of nonperforming assets to
loans and other real estate at year-end 2017 was 0.40%,
compared to 0.70% in 2016. The ratio of the end-of-year
balance of the allowance to end-of-year loans was 1.05%
for 2017, compared to 1.14% for 2016. Average loans were
$1.48 billion in 2017, an increase of $129.8 million, or 9.7%,
from the $1.35 billion reported in 2016. The amount of
provision to be taken in future periods will depend on
management’s assessment of the adequacy of the
allowance in relation to the loss experience of the entire
loan portfolio and periodic analysis of the portfolio’s credit
quality and economic and business conditions.

The Company’s banking assets are distributed across
eastern North Dakota, Minneapolis-St. Paul, and Duluth,
Minnesota, and the Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area,
with minimal exposure, less than 1.5% of loans, to the
western North Dakota oil-related areas.

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 7

NONINTEREST INCOME

The Company continues to expand noninterest income
associated with the Company’s banking, mortgage,
retirement and benefit services, and wealth management
divisions. The Company’s primary sources of noninterest
income consist of retirement plan and recordkeeping
services, trust and investment services, loan fees, and net
gains on mortgage loan origination and sales activities.
Noninterest income of $103.5 million represented 60.5% of
revenue for 2017 compared with $104.2 million, or 62.5% of
revenue, for 2016, and $93.3 million, or 63.8% of revenue, for
2015. The decrease in noninterest income in 2017 was due
to decreased mortgage banking revenue from lower
originations and sales. Table 4 provides a summary of
changes in noninterest income the past three years.

Retirement and benefit services, which includes retirement
plan administration, retirement plan investment advisory,
payroll, HSA, and other benefit services is the Company’s
largest source of noninterest income, reporting noninterest
income of $62.2 million in 2017, a $4.4 million, or 7.7%
increase, from the $57.8 million reported in 2016. A majority
of retirement services fees are transaction or participant
based plan fees, with the remainder based on the market
value of assets under administration. At December 31, 2017,
assets under administration totaled $28.2 billion, up
$3.2 billion, or 12.8%, from $25.0 billion at December 31, 2016.

Wealth management noninterest income, which includes
personal trust services and investment services offered
by the Bank and Alerus Securities was $14.1 million, a
$1.5 million, or 11.6%, increase from the $12.6 million
reported in 2016. The Company earns trust, investment,
and individual retirement account fees from managing
and administering assets, including mutual funds,
corporate trusts, personal trusts, and separately managed
accounts. Trust and investment fees are primarily based
on a tiered scale relative to the market value of the assets
under management. At December 31, 2017, assets under
management totaled $3.8 billion, up $0.5 billion, or 13.8%,
from the $3.4 billion reported in 2016.

Mortgage banking noninterest income, consisting of net
servicing income and net gains on loan origination and
sales activities, totaled $20.7 million in 2017, a $7.6 million,
or 26.8%, decrease from the $28.3 million reported in 2016.
The Company’s mortgage division originated $876.3 million
in loans in 2017, a $197.9 million, or 18.6%, decrease from
the $1.1 billion in loans originated in 2016. The Company
retained on balance sheet $176.5 million of mortgage loans
in 2017 as compared to $48.7 million in 2016, which reduced
the net gains on loan sales. The Company’s mix of refinance
and home purchase mortgage originations increased from
68% home purchase in 2016 to 80% home purchase in 2017.

TABLE 4 – NONINTEREST INCOME
Year ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Retirement services
Wealth management
Mortgage banking
Service charges on deposit accounts
Investment security gains (losses)
Other noninterest income

Total noninterest income

2017
___________________
$ 62,234
14,109
20,700
1,854
(13)
4,575
___________________
$103,459
___________________
___________________

2016
_________________
$ 57,804
12,640
28,296
1,916
(24)
4,449
_________________
$105,081
_________________
_________________

2015
_________________
$51,059
11,418
24,630
1,611
(17)
4,554
_________________
$93,255
_________________
_________________

Noninterest income as a % of revenue

60.46%

62.54%

63.82%

% Increase/
decrease
2017/2016
_______________________
7.66%
11.62%
-26.84%
-3.24%
45.83%
2.83%
__________
-1.54%
__________
__________
-3.33%

% Increase/
decrease
2016/2015
_______________________
13.21%
10.70%
14.88%
18.93%
41.18%
-2.31%
____________
12.68%
____________
____________
-2.00%

8

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

Total noninterest expense was $134.9 million in 2017, an
$8.8 million, or 6.2%, decrease from the $143.8 million
reported in 2016. Operating expenses decreased in 2017 as
the previous year included $6.7 million of nonrecurring
operating expenses related to the acquisitions of ABGNCS
and Beacon Bank. Additionally, intangible amortization
expense decreased from $7.0 million in 2016 to $5.6 million
in 2017.

The Company’s efficiency ratio, defined as the percent of
noninterest expense to total revenue, improved to 78.8% in
2017, from 85.5% in 2016.

Chart H illustrates the trend in the efficiency ratio over the
last five years.

$70.7 million in 2016, a decrease of $3.2 million or 4.5%
over 2016. Employee benefit costs were $16.5 million in
2017, a $0.5 million, or 3.2%, increase from the $16.0 million
reported in 2016. The decrease in salaries and incentives
was a result of lower mortgage incentive payments due to
lower originations, as well as fewer employees following
the integration of the Company’s prior acquisitions.

Occupancy expense was $6.3 million in 2017, a
$0.1 million decrease from the $6.4 million reported in
2016. Furniture and equipment expense was $5.6 million
in 2017, reflecting a 7.5% decrease from the $6.0 million
reported in 2016. The decrease in occupancy and furniture
and equipment expenses is primarily the result of the
closure of three branch offices in 2016 and the consolidation
of office space accumulated in previous acquisitions.

Chart H
Efficiency Ratio

85.5%

80.8%

78.8%

77.3%

73.7%

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

87.5%

85.0%

82.5%

80.0%

77.5%

75.0%

72.5%

70.0%

While control of noninterest expense is a priority for
management, the higher-than-average efficiency ratio is
partially due to the Company generating 60.5% of total
revenue from noninterest income sources. The efficiency
ratio for a business comprised primarily of net interest
margin income is generally lower than a diversified
financial services company, comprised primarily of asset
management and administration income and mortgage
origination income.

Personnel expenses, which include salaries, commissions,
incentive compensation, and employee benefits, are the
largest expense component for the Company, representing
62.3% of noninterest expenses in 2017 and 60.3% in 2016.
Salary expense was $67.6 million in 2017 as compared to

The Company has acquired 18 companies since 2002 for
an aggregate premium of $88.1 million in excess of book
value, creating identified intangible assets of $60.7 million
and $27.3 million in goodwill on the balance sheet. The
identified intangible assets amortize for book purposes and
are reported in other noninterest expense. Goodwill is
evaluated annually for impairment and does not amortize
for book purposes. The amortization schedules vary based
on the type and quality of the acquisition. The aggregate
unamortized intangible balance as of December 31, 2017,
is $27.1 million, which will fully amortize by December 31,
2025. The intangible amortization expense for 2017 was
$5.6 million, compared to $7.0 million in 2016, a 19.7%
decrease, as a result of past acquisitions being fully
amortized during the year.

As the acquisitions were integrated and efficiencies
realized, a number of operating expenses were reduced
from the levels incurred in 2016. Supplies, telephone and
postage expenses were reduced 18.7% to $4.5 million,
correspondent and other outside service fees were reduced
11.2% to $11.4 million and other expenses were reduced
14.9% to $9.5 million. Table 5 provides a summary of
changes in non-interest expenses for the past three years.

TABLE 5 – NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Year ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Salaries and incentives
Employee benefits and taxes
Net occupancy
Furniture and equipment
Intangible amortization
Marketing, business development,
and public relations
Supplies, telephone, and postage
FDIC insurance
Professional fees – legal, audit,
and consulting
Correspondent and other
outside service fees
Other expenses

Total noninterest expense

2017
___________________
$ 67,576
16,490
6,266
5,568
5,623

3,274
4,504
1,311

3,409

2016
_________________
$ 70,739
15,975
6,437
6,018
7,005

3,239
5,538
1,458

3,381

2015
_________________
$ 59,122
12,804
5,203
5,018
4,361

3,907
4,404
1,175

2,552

Change
2017/2016
_______________________
-4.47%
3.22%
-2.66%
-7.48%
-19.73%

1.08%
-18.67%
-10.08%

Change
2016/2015
_______________________
19.65%
24.77%
23.72%
19.93%
60.63%

-17.10%
25.75%
24.09%

0.83%

32.48%

11,422
9,477
___________________
$134,920
___________________
___________________

12,860
11,142
___________________
$143,792
___________________
___________________

9,394
10,194
____________________
$118,134
____________________
____________________

-11.18%
-14.94%
_____________

-6.17%

_____________
_____________

36.90%
9.30%

_____________
21.72%
_____________
_____________

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 9

BALANCE SH EET ANALYSIS
OVERVIEW

At December 31, 2017, total assets were $2.14 billion, up
$86.5 million from December 31, 2016, primarily as a result
of increased loan production. Total average assets of the
Company were $2.00 billion in 2017, a $66.8 million, or
3.5%, increase from the $1.93 billion reported in 2016.
Chart I illustrates average total assets for the past five years.
Average earning assets were $1.82 billion in 2017, an
increase of $74.2 million, or 4.2 %, from the $1.75 billion
reported in 2016. Average earning assets represent 91.2% of
average total assets in 2017, compared to 90.5% in 2016.
Average interest-bearing liabilities represented 71.6% of
average earning assets in 2017, compared to 73.9% in 2016.

Chart I
Average Assets

$2,001

$1,934

$1,533

$1,424

$1,308

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

$2,200

$2,000

$1,800

$1,600

$1,400

$1,200

$1,000

INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The Company uses its investment securities portfolio to
manage enterprise interest rate risk, provide liquidity,
generate interest and dividend income, and as collateral
for public funds. While the Company intends to hold its
investment securities to maturity, it may sell available-
for-sale securities in response to structural changes in
interest rate risks and to meet liquidity requirements,
among other factors.

At December 31, 2017, investment securities totaled
$274.4 million, compared to $278.9 million at December 31,
2016, representing a decrease of $4.5 million. Average
investment securities for 2017 were $286.3 million, with a
weighted average tax equivalent yield of 2.25%, compared
with $280.0 million and a weighted average tax equivalent
yield of 2.31% for 2016. The investment securities portfolio
has been managed to meet the Company’s investment
portfolio guidelines for yield and duration.

The Company’s available-for-sale securities are carried at
fair value with changes in fair value reflected in other
comprehensive income (loss) unless a security is deemed to
be other-than-temporarily impaired. At December 31,
2017, the Company’s gross unrealized gains on the available-

for-sale securities were $1.1 million, compared with
$1.3 million at December 31, 2016. Gross unrealizable
losses on available-for-sale securities totaled $2.6 million
at December 31, 2017, compared with $4.4 million at
December 31, 2016.

The Company conducts a regular assessment of its
investment portfolio to determine whether any securities
are other-than-temporarily impaired. When assessing
unrealized losses for other-than-temporary impairment,
the Company considers the nature of the investment, the
financial condition of the issuer, the extent and duration
of the unrealized loss, and expected cash flows of the
underlying assets and market conditions. On December 31,
2017, the Company held certain investments having
continuous unrealized loss positions for more than 12
months. As of December 31, 2017, the unrealized losses on
these securities totaled $1.54 million. During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the Company evaluated all of its debt
securities for credit impairment and determined there were
no credit losses evident. At December 31, 2017, the Company
had no plans to sell securities with unrealized losses and
believes it is unlikely that it would be required to sell such
securities before a recovery of their amortized cost.

LOANS

Total loans were $1.57 billion at December 31, 2017, a
$207.5 million increase from December 31, 2016. The
increase was primarily the result of growth in the
commercial loan portfolios and the retention of single
family mortgage loans originated through the Company’s
mortgage division. Table 6 sets forth the composition of the
loan portfolio, both in terms of dollars and percentage for
the past five years. Average loans were $1.48 billion in 2017,
a $129.8 million, or 9.7%, increase from the $1.35 billion
reported in 2016. The average loan to deposit ratio increased
to 82.2% for 2017, from 77.4% for 2016.

The Company periodically sells loans to a participation
network to manage concentration risk and reduce credit
exposure. The sold loan portfolio was $591.8 million on
December 31, 2017, a $33.6 million, or 5.4%, decrease from
the $625.4 million reported at December 31, 2016. The
Company also had $17.9 million of mortgages held for sale
at December 31, 2017, a $17.1 million, or 48.9%, decrease
from the $35.1 million reported at December 31, 2016.
Mortgages held for sale are all single-family residential
mortgage loans that will be sold to the secondary market,
usually within 30 days of origination.

10

TABLE 6 – LOANS
As of December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Commercial
Commercial and industrial
Real estate construction
Real estate mortgage
Farmland and agricultural

Total commercial

Consumer
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
Real estate 1-4 family junior mortgage
Automobile
Other revolving and installment
Total consumer

Total loans

Percent Of Loans By Type
Commercial
Commercial and industrial
Real estate construction
Real estate mortgage
Farmland and agricultural

Total commercial

Consumer
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
Real estate 1-4 family junior mortgage
Automobile
Other revolving and installment

Total consumer

Total loans and leases

2017
_____________________

2016
______________________

2015
____________________

2014
_____________________

2013
__________________

$ 436,980
22,348
444,857
43,615
_____________________
947,800

348,964
195,103
56,928
25,679
_____________________
626,674
_____________________
$ 1,574,474
_____________________
_____________________

$ 435,798
34,654
380,045
48,659
______________________
899,156

202,217
178,795
58,332
28,452
______________________
467,796
______________________
$1,366,952
______________________
______________________

$ 379,914
16,780
261,345
53,514
____________________
711,553

170,397
162,295
62,509
20,167
____________________
415,368
____________________
$1,126,921
____________________
____________________

$ 351,460
20,544
256,281
62,340
______________________
690,625

167,177
157,921
57,214
22,521
______________________
404,833
______________________
$ 1,095,458
______________________
______________________

$328,183
8,260
259,681
54,245
__________________
650,369

108,682
95,348
46,150
14,015
__________________
264,195
__________________
$914,564
__________________
__________________

27.8%
1.4%
28.3%
2.8%

_____________________

31.9%
2.5%
27.8%
3.6%

______________________

33.7%
1.5%
23.2%
4.7%

____________________

32.1%
1.9%
23.4%
5.7%

______________________

35.9%
0.9%
28.4%
5.9%

__________________

60.2%

65.8%

63.1%

63.0%

71.1%

22.2%
12.4%
3.6%
1.6%

_____________________

14.8%
13.1%
4.3%
2.1%

______________________

15.1%
14.4%
5.5%
1.8%

____________________

15.3%
14.4%
5.2%
2.1%

______________________

11.9%
10.4%
5.0%
1.5%

__________________

_____________________

39.8%

_____________________
_____________________

100.0%

______________________

34.2%

______________________
______________________

100.0%

____________________

36.9%

______________________

37.0%

____________________
____________________

100.0%

______________________
______________________

100.0%

__________________

28.9%

100.0%

__________________
__________________

DEPOSITS

Deposits totaled $1.83 billion at December 31, 2017,
compared with $1.79 billion at December 31, 2016,
representing an increase of $49.8 million, or 2.8%. Core
deposits provide the Company’s major source of funds
from individuals, businesses, and local government
units Core deposits include noninterest-bearing deposits,
interest-bearing checking, certificates of deposit less
than $250 thousand, and money market saving deposits.
Core deposits funded 84.5% and 85.6% of total assets at
December 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Average deposits
were $1.80 billion in 2017, a $58.3 million, or 3.4%, increase,
compared with the $1.74 billion reported in 2016. During
the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company converted
$92.5 million of Health Savings Account (HSA) deposits,
which were acquired in the ABGNCS acquisition, to the
Bank. The HSA deposits were previously held in a custody
relationship at another bank, as ABGNCS was not a
depository institution.

Noninterest-bearing deposits were $619.3 million at
December 31, 2017, a $64.8 million, or 11.7%, increase from
the $554.5 million reported at December 31, 2016.
Average noninterest-bearing deposits were $488.3 million
in 2017, a $44.8 million, or 10.1%, increase compared with
$443.5 million in 2016.

Interest-bearing non-maturity deposits totaled $1.01 billion
at December 31, 2017, a $21.2 million, or 2.1%, increase from
the $990.2 million reported at December 31, 2016. Average
interest-bearing non-maturity deposits were $956.6 million
in 2017, a $15.4 million, or 1.6%, decrease compared with
$972.0 million in 2016. Interest-bearing time deposits
were $204.3 million at December 31, 2017, a $36.3 million,
or 15.1%, decrease from the $240.5 million reported at
December 31, 2016. Average interest-bearing time
deposits were $219.2 million in 2017, a $32.2 million, or
12.8%, decrease compared with $251.4 million reported
in 2016. Time certificates of deposit are managed to levels
deemed appropriate given alternative funding sources.
Table 7 provides a summary of changes in deposits for the
past five years.

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 11

TABLE 7 – DEPOSITS
As of December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Non-interest-bearing deposits
Interest-bearing deposits
Savings accounts
Interest-bearing checking accounts
Money market savings
Certificates of deposit of $250,000 and less
Certificates of deposit in excess of $250,000

Total interest-bearing deposits

Total deposits

Percent Of Deposits By Type
Non-interest-bearing deposits
Interest-bearing deposits
Savings accounts
Interest-bearing checking accounts
Money market savings
Certificates of deposit of $250,000 and less
Certificates of deposit in excess of $250,000

Total interest-bearing deposits

Total deposits

2016
_____________________
$ 619,333

2015
_____________________
$ 554,490

2014
_____________________
$ 425,608

2013
_____________________
$ 330,218

2012

_______________________
$ 305,042

50,794
416,991
543,583
176,010
28,251
_____________________
1,215,629
_____________________
$1,834,962
_____________________
_____________________

48,371
325,474
616,341
210,312
30,221
_____________________
1,230,719
_____________________
$1,785,209
_____________________
_____________________

37,798
291,979
486,181
191,568
24,887
_____________________
1,032,413
_____________________
$1,458,021
_____________________
_____________________

30,397
243,334
447,346
182,099
28,774
_____________________
931,950
_____________________
$ 1,262,168
_____________________
_____________________

24,750
186,916
439,946
190,767
35,182
_______________________
877,561
_______________________
$1,182,603
_______________________
_______________________

33.8%

31.1%

29.2%

26.2%

25.8%

2.8%
22.7%
29.6%
9.6%
1.5%

_____________________

2.7%
18.2%
34.5%
11.8%
1.7%

_____________________

2.6%
20.0%
33.3%
13.1%
1.7%

_____________________

2.4%
19.3%
35.4%
14.4%
2.3%

_____________________

2.1%
15.8%
37.2%
16.1%
3.0%

_______________________

_____________________

66.2%

_____________________
_____________________

100.0%

_____________________

68.9%

_____________________
_____________________

100.0%

_____________________

70.8%

_____________________

73.8%

_______________________

74.2%

_____________________
_____________________

100.0%

_____________________
_____________________

100.0%

_______________________
_______________________

100.0%

BORROWINGS

The Company utilizes both short-term and long-term
borrowings as part of its asset/liability management
and funding strategies. Short-term borrowings, as of
December 31, 2017, totaled $30.0 million, compared to
$0.7 million reported at December 31, 2016. Short-term
borrowings consists of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
and Federal Funds Purchased.

The Company utilizes long-term debt to fund longer term
assets and as a source of regulatory capital. Long-term
debt was $58.8 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Long-term debt at December 31, 2017 and 2016, included
subordinated notes, trust preferred securities, and a capital
lease obligation on the Corporate Center office located in
Grand Forks, North Dakota.

On December 17, 2015, the Company issued $50 million of
subordinated notes with a maturity date of December 30,
2025. The notes bear a fixed rate of interest at 5.75%,
through December 30, 2020, and then convert to floating-
rate notes that reset quarterly to an interest rate equal
to three month LIBOR plus 412 basis points. Through
December 30, 2020, interest is payable semi-annually on
June 30 and December 30, and thereafter interest is paid
quarterly on March 30, June 30, September 30, and
December 30. The subordinated notes qualify as Tier 2
capital for regulatory purposes. The proceeds were utilized
for the acquisitions of ABGNCS and Beacon Bank in January
2016 and to retire the $20.0 million of SBLF preferred stock
in February 2016.

In January 2016, the Company acquired Beacon Bank
and assumed $10.0 million of trust preferred securities,
junior subordinated debentures, in two trusts. Trust I was
formed in 2003 and issued $4.0 million of floating rate
notes that bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 3.10%,
and reset quarterly. Trust II was formed in 2006 and issued
$6.0 million of floating rate notes that bear interest at three-
month LIBOR plus 1.80%, and reset quarterly. The Trust I

securities mature on June 26, 2033, and Trust II securities
mature on September 15, 2036. Both are redeemable with
the approval of the Federal Reserve Board, in whole or in
part, at the Company’s option at any time upon the
occurrence of certain events affecting their tax or
regulatory capital treatment. The trust preferred securities
were marked to market at the time of the Beacon Bank
acquisition and are reported on the balance sheet at
$8.3 million, as of December 31, 2017, and $8.2 million as
of December 31, 2016.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company is committed to managing capital for
maximum stockholder benefit and maintaining strong
protection for depositors and creditors. The Company
continually assesses its business risk and capital position.
The Company also manages its capital to exceed regulatory
capital requirements for well-capitalized bank holding
companies. Total common stockholders’ equity was
$180.6 million at December 31, 2017, an $11.8 million, or
7.0%, increase from the $168.8 million reported at
December 31, 2016. The increase is the result of current
year’s earnings less dividend payments to common
stockholders, and the market value change, net of the
related tax impact, in the investment portfolio.

In 2012 the Company applied for and received approval for
$20 million in SBLF at an initial interest rate of 1.0%. The
Company viewed the SBLF as an intermediate source of
capital and redeemed the preferred stock in February 2016
utilizing a portion of the proceeds from the subordinated
note issuance. The SBLF preferred stock interest rate was
scheduled to increase to 9% in February 2016.

The Company paid dividends of $0.48 during 2017,
representing a $0.04, or 9.1%, increase over the $0.44
paid during 2016. Dividends per share data was adjusted
for a 3-for-1 stock split completed in the third quarter of
2014. The Company’s dividend policy is influenced by
the belief that most stockholders are interested in

12

long-term appreciation as well as current yield. The current
dividend yield is considered reasonable given the Company’s
present cash flow position, level of earnings, and the
strength of its capital.

Banking industry regulators define minimum capital
and well capitalized standards for banks and holding
companies (see The Company and Bank Required Capital
Levels section of this report). The Company’s and the Bank’s
regulatory capital ratios, as of December 31, for the past five
years are set forth in Table 8 and exceeded all minimum
capital and well capitalized standards. The acquisitions that
closed in January 2016 utilized a substantial amount of the
Company’s excess capital, and significantly increased the
asset base of the Company, which reduced regulatory
capital ratios.

The Basel III regulatory capital reforms (the “Basel III Rule”),
effective beginning January 1, 2015, contain provisions
which require certain adjustments and deductions from
common equity Tier 1 capital, including goodwill and other
intangible assets (excluding mortgage servicing rights).
The Basel III Rule provided for a phase-in period for certain
deductions from capital that requires deductions of 40% in
2015, 60% in 2016, 80% in 2017, and 100% thereafter of the
deduction. The Company’s deduction for goodwill and
identifiable intangible assets, net of deferred tax liabilities,
represents goodwill of $26.3 million and identifiable
intangible assets of $21.8 million (80% of $27.2 million) as
of December 31, 2017, and goodwill of $27.7 million and
identifiable intangible assets of $19.6 million (60% of
$32.7 million) as of December 31, 2016.

TABLE 8 – REGULATORY CAPITAL
As of December 31,

Alerus Financial Corporation
Common equity tier 1
Tier 1 capital
Total capital
Tier 1 leverage

Alerus Financial, NA
Common equity tier 1
Tier 1 capital
Total capital
Tier 1 leverage

RISK ANALYSIS
ASSET QUALITY RISK

Well
Capitalized
_____________________

N/A
8.0%
10.0%
N/A

6.5%
8.0%
10.0%
5.0%

2017
_____________________

2016
_____________________

2015
_____________________

2014
_______________________

2013
_______________________

7.8%
8.3%
12.2%
7.1%

11.0%
11.0%
12.0%
9.4%

7.7%
8.2%
12.3%
6.9%

11.1%
11.1%
12.1%
9.3%

10.9%
12.3%
17.0%
10.9%

14.4%
14.4%
15.4%
12.6%

N/A
11.8%
13.0%
10.1%

N/A
11.3%
12.5%
9.6%

N/A
12.8%
14.1%
10.6%

N/A
12.3%
13.5%
10.1%

Management believes its ability to identify and assess the
risk and return characteristics of the Company’s loan
portfolio is critical for profitability and growth. It is in the
best interest of stockholders, regional communities, clients,
and the Company to follow a credit policy that carefully
balances risk and return, and ensures that potential credit
problems are closely monitored.

The Company’s strategy for credit risk management
includes well-defined, centralized credit policies; uniform
underwriting criteria; and ongoing risk monitoring and
review processes for all commercial and consumer credit
exposures. The strategy also emphasizes diversification
on a geographic, industry, and client level; regular credit
examinations; and management reviews of loans
experiencing deterioration of credit quality. The Company
strives to identify potential problem loans early, take
necessary charge-offs promptly, and maintain adequate
reserve levels for probable loan losses inherent in the
portfolio. Management performs ongoing, internal
reviews of any problem credits and continually assesses
the adequacy of the allowance. The Company utilizes
an internal lending division, Special Credit Services, to
develop and implement strategies for the management of
individual nonperforming loans.

The allowance provides coverage for probable and
estimable losses inherent in the Company’s loan portfolios.

Management evaluates the allowance each quarter to
determine if it is adequate to cover inherent losses. The
evaluation of each element and the overall allowance is
based on a continuing assessment of problem loans and
related off-balance sheet items, historic loss experience,
and other factors including regulatory guidance and
economic conditions.

At December 31, 2017, nonperforming assets were
$6.4 million, compared to $9.6 million in 2016, and
$12.0 million in 2015. Nonperforming assets represented
0.40% of total loans and other real estate in 2017, compared
to 0.70% in 2016, and 1.07% in 2015. Table 9 provides a
summary of nonperforming assets for the past five years.

At December 31, 2017, the allowance for loan losses was
$16.6 million, or 1.05%, of total loans compared with
$15.6 million, or 1.14%, at December 31, 2016, and
$14.7 million, or 1.30%, at December 31, 2015. The provision
for loan losses was $3.3 million in 2017, as compared to
$3.1 million in 2016 and $4.2 million in 2015. Net charge-
offs in 2017 were $2.3 million, or 0.16%, of average total
loans, compared to $2.1 million, or 0.16%, in 2016, and
$6.6 million, or 0.58%, in 2015. The Company considers
its allowance of $16.6 million adequate to cover losses
inherent in loans, commitments to extend credit, and
standby letters of credit at December 31, 2017. Table 10
provides a summary of the credit loss experience for the
past five years.

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 13

TABLE 9 – NONPERFORMING ASSETS
As of December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Commercial
Commercial and industrial
Real estate construction
Real estate mortgage
Farmland and agricultural

Total commercial

Consumer
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
Real estate 1-4 family junior mortgage
Automobile
Other revolving and installment

Total consumer

Total nonperforming loans
Foreclosed assets
Other real estate owned

Total nonperforming assets

2017
___________________

2016
___________________

2015
___________________

2014
___________________

2013
___________________

$

3,193
61
-
-
___________________
3,254

662
1,873
20
64
___________________
2,619
___________________

5,873
37
446
___________________
$
6,356
___________________
___________________

$

2,418
751
149
448
___________________
3,766

1,135
2,590
64
109
___________________
3,898
___________________

7,664
196
1,721
___________________
$
9,581
___________________
___________________

$

6,011
-
2,634
158
___________________
8,803

1,501
825
-
22
___________________
2,348
___________________

11,151
35
842
___________________
$ 12,028
___________________
___________________

$

572
-
1,844
-
___________________
2,416

144
1,400
35
-
___________________
1,579
___________________

3,995
11
2,478
___________________
$
6,484
___________________
___________________

$ 1,437
-
3,091
108
___________________
4,636

277
455
9
-
___________________
741
___________________

5,377
11
4,877
___________________
$ 10,265
___________________
___________________

Nonperforming assets / loans and other real estate
Allowance for loan losses / nonperforming loans

0.40%
282.04%

0.70%
203.74%

1.07%
131.72%

0.59%
427.11%

1.12%
313.15%

TABLE 10 – SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE
As of December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Average loans

Balance – beginning of period
Provision for loan losses
Commercial loan charge-offs
Commercial and Industrial
Real estate construction
Real estate mortgage
Farmland and Agriculture

Total commercial loan charge-offs

Consumer loan charge-offs
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
Real estate 1-4 family junior mortgage
Automobile
Other revolving and installment
Total consumer loan charge-offs

Total loan charge-offs
Commercial loan recoveries
Commercial and Industrial
Real estate construction
Real estate mortgage
Farmland and Agriculture

Total commercial recoveries

Consumer loan recoveries
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage
Real estate 1-4 family junior mortgage
Automobile
Other revolving and installment

Total consumer loan recoveries

Total loan recoveries

Net loan (charge-offs) recoveries

Balance – end of period

14

2017
___________________
$ 1,475,042
___________________
15,615
$
3,280

2,748
-
-
539
___________________
3,287

-
1,124
313
116
___________________
1,553
___________________
4,840
___________________

736
279
73
194
___________________
1,282

103
872
150
102
___________________
1,227
___________________
2,509
___________________
(2,331)
___________________
$
16,564
___________________
___________________

2016
___________________
$1,345,209
___________________
$ 14,688
3,060

2015
___________________
$1,124,601
___________________
$ 17,063
4,200

2013
___________________
$ 994,047
___________________
$ 16,838
(400)

2013
___________________
$832,445
___________________
$ 15,101
1,200

1,405
1,655
43
224
___________________
3,327

-
829
97
183
___________________
1,109
___________________
4,436
___________________

1,055
587
188
29
___________________
1,859

211
94
54
85
___________________
444
___________________
2,303
___________________
(2,133)
___________________
$ 15,615
___________________
___________________

6,797
-
400
109
___________________
7,306

5
596
155
115
___________________
871
___________________
8,177
___________________

230
697
166
3
___________________
1,096

10
287
93
116
___________________
506
___________________
1,602
___________________
(6,575)
___________________
$ 14,688
___________________
___________________

408
4
79
73
___________________
564

1
267
128
60
___________________
456
___________________
1,020
___________________

968
128
201
20
___________________
1,317

70
113
55
90
___________________
328
___________________
1,645
___________________
625
___________________
$ 17,063
___________________
___________________

538
2
16
-
___________________
556

10
146
148
225
___________________
529
___________________
1,085
___________________

1,187
200
75
19
___________________
1,481

6
36
15
84
___________________
141
___________________
1,622
___________________
537
___________________
$ 16,838
___________________
___________________

LIQUIDITY RISK

The Company’s liquidity risk management process
is designed to identify, measure, and manage the
Company’s funding and liquidity risk to meet its daily
funding needs and to address expected and unexpected
changes in its funding requirements. The Asset/Liability
Committee (“ALCO”) establishes policies, as well as analyzes
and manages the Company’s liquidity to ensure adequate
funds are always available at reasonable rates to meet
normal operating requirements in addition to unexpected
client demands for funds, such as high levels of deposit
withdrawals or loan demand, in a timely and cost effective
manner. Liquidity needs are provided for on both the asset
and liability side of the balance sheet. Asset liquidity is
provided by regular maturities of loans and maintaining
relatively short-term, marketable investments and federal
funds. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had
$75.2 million of un-pledged, available-for-sale securities.
Liability liquidity is provided through short-term federal
fund borrowings and borrowing capacity at the Federal
Home Loan Bank. As of December 31, 2017, the Company
had $87.0 million of unsecured lines of credit for federal
funds that may be drawn as needed and borrowing capacity
at the Federal Home Loan Bank of $367.6 million.

INTEREST RATE RISK

The Company’s major market risk exposure is to changes in
interest rates. To minimize the volatility of net interest
income and exposure to economic loss, the Company
manages its exposure to interest rate risk through
asset/liability management activities within the guidelines
established by ALCO and approved by the Board of Directors.

Interest rate risk can be broken down into the following
four components: 1) repricing risk results from the
difference in the timing of rate changes and the timing of
cash flows that occur in the pricing and maturity of the
bank’s assets and liabilities, 2) basis risk occurs when market
rates for different financial instruments, or the indices used
to price assets and liabilities change at different times or by
different amounts, 3) option risk occurs when clients have
the right to alter the level and/or timing of the cash flows
of an asset or a liability, and 4) term structure risk occurs
from variations in the movement of interest rates across
maturity spectrums. Interest rate risk is managed within
an overall asset/liability framework for the Company. The
Company positions the balance sheet to be interest rate
neutral to slightly asset sensitive, defined as allowing assets
on the balance sheet to reprice faster than the liabilities.
The Company chooses to manage the balance sheet to be
slightly asset sensitive to take advantage of a normally
upward sloping yield curve.

The Company utilizes the services of an external consulting
firm to facilitate the sensitivity analysis in the form of net
interest income simulation to help quantify the existing
interest rate risk embedded in the Company’s balance sheet
and to help identify ways to minimize the risk. The quarterly
analysis incorporates substantially all of the Company’s
assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments,
together with forecasted changes in the balance sheet
and assumptions that reflect the current interest rate
environment. The simulation model is used to measure
the impact on net interest income, relative to a base case
scenario, of interest rates increasing or decreasing 100,
200, and 300 basis points over the next 12 months. The
simulation run at December 31, 2017, illustrates a negative
2.57% change in net interest income for a 100 basis point
decline in interest rates, and a positive 2.03% change in net
interest income for a 200 basis point rise in interest rates.
The Company has established policy limits and was within
the limits as of December 31, 2017. The base case interest
rates for the simulation included the prime rate at 4.50%
and the federal funds rate at 1.50%.

The Company has successfully implemented interest rate
floors in a substantial number of underlying loan contracts
at rates above market indications. These interest rate floors
have preserved net interest rate margin in the current
environment but will cause slight interest rate compression
as interest rates rise since these loans will not reprice until
the floor rate is surpassed.

LINE OF BUSINESS FINANCIAL REVIEW
The Company’s major lines of business are Banking,
Mortgage, Retirement and Benefits, and Wealth
Management. These business lines are components of the
Company for which financial information is prepared and
evaluated regularly by management in deciding how to
allocate resources and assess performance. Business line
reporting was instituted in 2016, and therefore only two
years of historical information is available.

The business line results are derived from the Company’s
business unit profitability reporting systems and are
non-GAAP financial measures. The Selected Financial
Information presented on each business line sets forth
revenue and direct noninterest expense before indirect
overhead allocations. Corporate Administration includes the
indirect overhead and is set forth in the table below along
with income tax expense and the Consolidated Company
net income. The business line net income before taxes
represents direct revenue and expense before indirect
allocations and income taxes. Certain reclassification
adjustments have been made between Corporate
Administration and the various lines of business for
consistency in presentation. Table 11 sets forth the business
line performance for 2017 and 2018.

TABLE 11 – BUSINESS LINE PERFORMANCE
As of December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Banking
Mortgage
Retirement and Benefits
Wealth Management
Corporate Administration
Income before income taxes
Income tax expense
Net income

2017
___________________
38,281
$
3,040
20,413
6,541
(35,346)
___________________
32,929
17,485
___________________
$
15,444
___________________
___________________

2016
___________________
$ 34,511
5,555
13,325
5,102
(37,324)
___________________
21,169
7,138
___________________
$ 14,031
___________________
___________________

Change %
___________________

10.9%
-45.3%
53.2%
28.2%
-5.3%
55.6%
145.0%
10.1%

___________________

___________________
___________________
___________________

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 15

Net income for the Company increased 10.1% in 2017, with
strong growth in net income before taxes in Banking, 10.9%,
Retirement and Benefits, 53.2%, and Wealth Management,
28.2%. Mortgage net income before taxes decreased 45.3%
due to lower origination volumes and retention of more
loans for the Banking portfolio. Pretax income increased
55.6% to $32.9 million from the $21.2 million reported for
2017. Income tax expense increased 145.0% to $17.5 million,
primarily as a result of the deferred tax charges incurred
during 2017, as previously reported.

Assets Under Administration (AUA) & Assets Under
Management (AUM)

Table 12 sets forth the business lines where assets are
administered and assets are managed. AUA include assets
that are administered in both Retirement and Benefits and
Wealth Management. AUM for Retirement and Benefits
includes assets that are also administered and are included
in the AUA number for Retirement and Benefits. Internally
managed assets include the bank’s investment portfolio and
certain funds that are internally managed by the Wealth
Management business line.

TABLE 12 – ASSETS UNDER ADMINISTRATION & ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
As of December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Assets Under Administration (AUA)
Retirement & Benefits
Wealth Management

Total Assets Under Administration

Assets Under Management (AUM)
Retirement & Benefits
Wealth Management
Total Assets Under Management

Internally Managed Assets

2017
_________________________

2016
_________________________

Change %
___________________

$ 28,127,961
92,285
_________________________
$ 28,220,246
_________________________
_________________________

$ 24,950,545
77,545
_________________________
$ 25,028,090
_________________________
_________________________

$

1,238,404
2,609,681
$
3,848,085
_________________________
_________________________
529,778
$

$ 1,158,340
2,221,447
$ 3,379,787
_________________________
_________________________
514,021
$

12.7%
19.0%
________
12.8%
________
________

6.9%
17.5%
13.9%
________
________

3.1%

AUA increased 12.8% during 2017 from $25.0 billion to
$28.2 billion, driven by organic growth and increases in
the market values of AUA. AUM increased 13.9% from
$3.4 billion to $3.8 billion due to solid organic growth and
market value increases.

Banking offers a complete line of loan, deposit, cash
management, and treasury services through seventeen
offices in North Dakota, Minnesota, and Arizona. These
products and services are supported through web and
mobile based applications. The majority of the Company’s
assets and liabilities are on the Banking business line
balance sheet. Table 13 sets forth the banking business line
performance for 2017 and 2016.

TABLE 13 – BANKING BUSINESS LINE PERFORMANCE
As of December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Condensed Income Statement
Net interest income
Noninterest income

Total net revenue
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest expense

Net income before income taxes

Average Balance Sheet
Total loan
Goodwill
Other intangible assets
Total Assets
Deposits

2017
_________________________

2016
_________________________

Change %
___________________

$

70,377
7,180
_________________________
77,557
3,280
35,996
_________________________
$
38,281
_________________________
_________________________

$

1,474,774
20,130
3,200
1,936,945
1,664,022

$

64,990
6,895
_________________________
71,885
3,060
34,314
_________________________
$
34,511
_________________________
_________________________

$ 1,343,208
18,464
3,881
1,845,947
1,666,792

8.3%
4.1%

________

7.9%
7.2%
4.9%

________
10.9%
________
________

9.8%
.0%
-17.5%
4.9%
-0.2%

16

Banking reported net income before income taxes of
$38.3 million on revenue of $77.6 million for 2017,
compared with net income before taxes of $34.5 million on
revenues of $71.9 million for 2016. Net interest income
increased 8.3% as a result of a 9.8% increase in the average
loans outstanding. Noninterest income, provision for loan

losses, and noninterest expense were comparable for the
full years of 2017 and 2016. Average loans increased by
$131.6 million and average deposits were flat for the year.

Mortgage offers first and second mortgage loans through a
centralized mortgage unit in Minneapolis, Minnesota as
well as through the Banking office locations.

TABLE 14 – MORTGAGE BUSINESS LINE PERFORMANCE
As of December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Condensed Income Statement
Net interest income
Noninterest income
Total net revenue
Noninterest expense

Net income before income taxes

Mortgage originations

2017
___________________

2016
_____________________

Change %
___________________

$

740
21,402
___________________
22,142
19,102
___________________
$
3,040
___________________
___________________
$ 867,253

$

1,302
26,949
____________________
28,251
22,696
____________________
$
5,555
____________________
____________________
$1,065,132

-43.2%
-20.6%
_________
-21.6%
-15.8%
_________
-45.3%
_________
_________
-18.6%

Mortgage reported net income before taxes of
$3.0 million on revenue of $22.1 million for 2017
compared to net income before taxes of $5.6 million on
revenue of $28.3 million for 2016. Mortgage originations
for 2017 were $867.3 million as compared to $1.1 billion
in 2016. Net interest income is generated from the Loans
Held for Sale portfolio, while noninterest income is
primarily from the gain on sale of mortgage loans. During
2017, the Company retained a higher volume of loans on
balance sheet, $176.5 million, compared to the $48.7 million
retained in 2016. This resulted in lower noninterest income
for Mortgage, but higher net interest income for the Banking
business line. Noninterest expense decreased from
$22.7 million to $19.1 million, or 15.8%, during the year

on lower commission expense due to lower volumes,
and the deferral of loan origination expenses associated
with portfolio loans. Mortgage business line performance
for 2017 and 2016 is set forth in Table 14.

Retirement and Benefits offers retirement plan
administration and investment advisory services, ESOP
fiduciary services, payroll, health savings account, and
other benefit services to clients nationwide. The Retirement
and Benefits segment has over $28.1 billion of Assets Under
Administration (AUA) in all 50 states. Table 15 sets forth
the retirement and benefits business line performance for
2017 and 2016.

TABLE 15 - RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS BUSINESS LINE PERFORMANCE
As of December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Condensed Income Statement
Noninterest income

Total net revenue
Noninterest expense

Net income before income taxes

Assets under management
Assets under administration

2017
________________________

2016
________________________

Change %
___________________

$
62,390
_______________________
62,390
41,977
_______________________
$
20,413
_______________________
_______________________

$
57,804
________________________
57,804
44,479
________________________
$
13,325
________________________
________________________

$ 1,238,404
28,127,961

$ 1,158,340
24,950,545

7.9%

_________

7.9%
-5.6%
_________
53.2%
_________
_________

6.9%
12.7%

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 17

Retirement and Benefits reported net income before taxes
of $20.4 million on revenue of $62.4 million for 2017
compared to $13.3 million net income before taxes on
revenue of $57.8 million for 2016. Noninterest expense for
2017 was $42.0 million as compared to $44.5 million for
2016, a decrease of 5.6% as a result of acquisition related
expenses in 2016. AUA increased to $28.1 billion from
$25.0 billion during the year, primarily due to increasing
market values.

Wealth Management offers trust and fiduciary services,
investment management, and financial planning services to
clients, and has $3.1 billion of Assets Under Management

(AUM), $2.6 billion for external clients, and $530 million for
internal clients, including the Banking investment portfolio.
Table 16 sets forth the wealth management business line
performance for 2017 and 2016.

Wealth Management reported net income before taxes
of $6.5 million on revenue of $14.7 million for 2017 as
compared to net income before taxes of $5.1 million on
revenue of $13.7 million for 2016. Total net revenue
increased 7.6%, while noninterest expense decreased 4.7%.
Noninterest expense decreased from $8.6 million to $8.2
million during the year. AUM increased 14.8% from $2.74
billion to $3.14 billion during the year.

TABLE 16 – WEALTH MANAGEMENT BUSINESS LINE PERFORMANCE
As of December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Condensed Income Statement
Net interest income
Noninterest income

Total net revenue
Noninterest expense

Net income before income taxes

Assets under management
Assets under administration
Internally managed assets

2017
________________________

2016
________________________

Change %
___________________

$

57
14,660
_______________________
14,717
8,176
_______________________
$
6,541
_______________________
_______________________

$ 2,609,681
92,285
529,778

$

54
13,629
________________________
13,683
8,581
________________________
$
5,102
________________________
________________________

$ 2,221,447
77,545
514,021

5.6%
7.6%

_________

7.6%
-4.7%

_________
28.2%
_________
_________

17.5%
19.0%
3.1%

REGU LATORY CHANG ES

Financial institutions, their holding companies and their
affiliates, along with securities broker dealers, registered
investment advisors, and insurance agencies, are
extensively regulated under federal and state law. As
a result, the growth and earnings performance of the
Company may be affected not only by management
decisions and general economic conditions, but also by
requirements of federal and state statutes and by the
regulations and policies of various bank regulatory
agencies, including the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (the “OCC”), the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”), the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), and the Bureau of
Consumer Financial Protection (the “CFPB”). Furthermore,
taxation laws administered by the Internal Revenue Service
and state taxing authorities, accounting rules developed by
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”), and
securities laws administered by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”) and state securities authorities have
an impact on the business of the Company. The effect of
these statutes, regulations, regulatory policies, and
accounting rules are significant to the operations and
results of the Company, the Bank, and its indirect subsidiary,
Alerus Securities Corporation.

Federal and state banking laws impose a comprehensive
system of supervision, regulation, and enforcement on the

operations of financial institutions, their holding companies,
and affiliates that is intended primarily for the protection of
the FDIC-insured deposits and depositors of banks, rather
than stockholders. These federal and state laws, and the
regulations of the bank regulatory agencies issued under
them, affect, among other things, the scope of business, the
kinds and amounts of investments banks may make, reserve
requirements, capital levels relative to operations, the
nature and amount of collateral for loans, the establishment
of branches, the ability to merge, consolidate and acquire,
dealings with insiders and affiliates, and the payment of
dividends. Federal and state securities and insurance laws
impose a comprehensive system of supervision, regulation,
and enforcement on the operations of securities broker
dealers, registered investment advisors, and insurance
agencies’ financial institutions, that is intended primarily
for the protection of clients, rather than stockholders.

The following is a summary of the material elements of
the supervisory and regulatory framework applicable
to the Company and the bank. It does not describe all of
the statutes, regulations, and regulatory policies that
apply, nor does it restate all of the requirements of those
that are described. The descriptions are qualified in their
entirety by reference to the particular statutory and
regulatory provision.

18

FINANCIAL REGULATORY REFORM

On July 21, 2010, former President Barack Obama signed the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) into law. The Dodd-Frank Act
represented a sweeping reform of the U.S. supervisory and
regulatory framework applicable to financial institutions
and capital markets in the wake of the global financial crisis.
In particular, and among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act:
(i) created a Financial Stability Oversight Council as part of
a regulatory structure for identifying emerging systemic
risks and improving interagency cooperation; (ii) created
the CFPB, which is authorized to regulate providers of
consumer credit, savings, payment, and other consumer
financial products and services; (iii) narrowed the scope of
federal preemption of state consumer laws enjoyed by
national banks and federal savings associations and
expanded the authority of state attorneys general to bring
actions to enforce federal consumer protection legislation;
(iv) imposed more stringent capital requirements on
bank holding companies and subjected certain activities,
including interstate mergers and acquisitions, to heightened
capital conditions; (v) with respect to mortgage lending,
(a) significantly expanded requirements applicable to loans
secured by 1-4 family residential real property, (b) imposed
strict rules on mortgage servicing, and (c) required the
originator of a securitized loan, or the sponsor of a
securitization, to retain at least 5% of the credit risk of
securitized exposures unless the underlying exposures
are qualified residential mortgages or meet certain
underwriting standards; (vi) repealed the prohibition on
the payment of interest on business checking accounts;
(vii) restricted the interchange fees payable on debit card
transactions for issuers with $10 billion in assets or greater;
(viii) in the so-called “Volcker Rule,” subject to numerous
exceptions, prohibited depository institutions and affiliates
from certain investments in, and sponsorship of, hedge
funds and private equity funds and from engaging in
proprietary trading; (ix) provided for enhanced regulation
of advisers to private funds and of the derivatives markets;
(x) enhanced oversight of credit rating agencies; and
(xi) prohibited banking agency requirements tied to credit
ratings. These statutory changes shifted the regulatory
framework for financial institutions and impacted the way
in which they do business.

THE INCREASING REGULATORY
EMPHASIS ON CAPITAL

Regulatory capital represents the net assets of a financial
institution available to absorb losses. Because of the risks
attendant to their businesses, depository institutions are
generally required to hold more capital than other
businesses, which directly affects returns on equity. Certain
provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and the Basel III Rule
establish strengthened capital standards for banks and bank
holding companies, require more capital to be held in the
form of common stock, and disallow certain funds from
being included in capital determinations. Once fully
implemented, these standards will represent regulatory
capital requirements that are meaningfully more stringent
than those in place historically.

THE COMPANY AND BANK REQUIRED
CAPITAL LEVELS

The Company and the Bank are subject to various
regulatory capital adequacy requirements administered
by the Federal Reserve and the OCC. Bank holding
companies have historically had to comply with less
stringent capital standards than their bank subsidiaries
and were able to raise capital with hybrid instruments such
as trust preferred securities and subordinated debentures.
The Dodd-Frank Act mandated the Federal Reserve to
establish minimum capital levels for bank holding
companies on a consolidated basis that are as stringent
as those required for insured depository institutions.
Additionally, after an extended rulemaking process, the U.S.
federal banking agencies approved the implementation of
the Basel III Rule, and, at the same time, promulgated rules
effecting certain changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act,
effective beginning January 1, 2015.

The Basel III Rule not only increased most of the required
minimum capital ratios, but it also introduced the concept
of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (CET1), which consists
primarily of common stock, related surplus (net of treasury
stock), retained earnings, and CET1 minority interests
subject to certain regulatory adjustments. The Basel III
Rule also expanded the definition of capital by establishing
more stringent criteria that instruments must meet to be
considered Additional Tier 1 Capital (Tier 1 Capital in
addition to Common Equity) and Tier 2 Capital. A number
of instruments that previously qualified as Tier 1 Capital
do not qualify, or their qualifications changed. For example,
cumulative preferred stock and certain hybrid capital
instruments, including trust preferred securities, no longer
qualify as Tier 1 Capital of any kind, with the exception,
subject to certain restrictions, of such instruments issued
before May 10, 2010, by bank holding companies with
total consolidated assets of less than $15 billion as of
December 31, 2009. For those institutions, trust preferred
securities and other non-qualifying capital instruments
previously included in consolidated Tier 1 Capital are
permanently grandfathered under the Basel III Rule, subject
to certain restrictions. Qualifying trust preferred securities
may also be assumed in conjunction with a bank acquisition
without impairing their grandfathered Tier 1 capital status.
Noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, which qualified as
simple Tier 1 Capital, does not qualify as CET1, but does
qualify as Additional Tier 1 Capital. The Basel III Rule also
constrains the inclusion of minority interests, mortgage-
servicing assets, and deferred tax assets in capital and
requires deductions from CET1 in the event such assets
exceed a certain percentage of a bank’s CET1.

The Basel III Rule contains provisions which require certain
adjustments and deductions from common equity Tier 1
capital, including goodwill and other intangible assets
(excluding mortgage servicing rights). The Basel III Rule
provided for a phase-in period for certain deductions from
capital that requires deductions of 40% in 2015, 60% in
2016, 80% in 2017, and 10% thereafter of the deduction.
Identifiable intangible assets that are not deducted during
the transitional period are risk weighted.

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 19

Under current federal regulations, incorporating the
Basel III Rule, the Bank is subject to the following minimum
capital standards:

• 4.5% CET1 to risk-weighted assets;

• 6.0% Tier 1 capital (i.e., CET1 plus Additional Tier 1) to

risk-weighted assets;

• 8.0% Total capital (i.e., Tier 1 plus Tier 2) to risk-weighted

assets; and

• 4.0% Tier 1 capital to average consolidated assets
as reported on consolidated financial statements
(leverage ratio).

In addition, institutions that seek the freedom to make
capital distributions (including for dividends and
repurchases of stock) and pay discretionary bonuses to
executive officers without restriction must also maintain
2.5% of risk-weighted assets in Common Equity Tier 1
attributable to a capital conservation buffer to be phased-in
over three years, beginning in 2016. The purpose of the
conservation buffer is to ensure that banks maintain a
buffer of capital that can be used to absorb losses during
periods of financial and economic stress. Factoring in the
fully phased-in conservation buffer increases the minimum
ratios depicted above to 7.0% for CET1, 8.5% for Tier 1
Capital, and 10.5% for Total Capital. The leverage ratio is not
impacted by the conservation buffer.

The Basel III Rule maintained the general structure of the
current prompt corrective action framework, while
incorporating the increased requirements. The prompt
corrective action guidelines were also revised to add the
CET1 Capital ratio. In order to be a “well-capitalized”
depository institution under the new regime, a bank and
holding company must maintain a CET1 Capital ratio of
6.5% or more, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 8% or more, a Total
Capital ratio of 10% or more, and a leverage ratio of 5% or
more. It is possible under the Basel III Rule to be well-
capitalized while remaining out of compliance with the
capital conservation buffer discussed above.

The Basel III Rule revised a number of the risk weightings
(or their methodologies) for bank assets that are used
to determine the capital ratios. For nearly every class of
assets, the Basel III Rule required a more complex, detailed,
and calibrated assessment of credit risk and calculation
of risk weightings.

Furthermore, there was significant concern noted by
the financial industry in connection with the Basel III
Rule as to the proposed treatment of accumulated other
comprehensive income (“AOCI”). The Basel III Rule requires
unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities
to flow through to regulatory capital as opposed to the
previous treatment, which neutralizes such effects.
Recognizing the problem for community banks, the U.S.

bank regulatory agencies adopted the Basel III Rule with a
one-time election for smaller institutions like the Company
and the Bank to opt out of, including most elements of AOCI
in regulatory capital. This opt-out, which was required to be
made in the first quarter of 2015, excluded from regulatory
capital both unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale
debt securities and accumulated net gains and losses on
cash-flow hedges and amounts attributable to defined
benefit post-retirement plans. The Company elected
to opt-out.

Generally, financial institutions (except for large,
internationally active financial institutions) became subject
to the new rules on January 1, 2015. However, there are
separate phase-in/phase-out periods for: (i) the capital
conservation buffer; (ii) regulatory capital adjustments and
deductions; (iii) non-qualifying capital instruments; and
(iv) changes to the prompt corrective action rules. The
phase-in periods commenced on January 1, 2016, and
extend until 2019.

PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION

A banking organization’s capital plays an important
role in connection with regulatory enforcement as well.
Federal law provides the federal banking regulators with
broad power to take prompt corrective action to resolve
the problems of undercapitalized institutions. The
extent of the regulators’ powers depends on whether
the institution in question is “adequately capitalized,”
“undercapitalized,”“significantly undercapitalized,”
or “critically undercapitalized,” in each case as defined
by regulation. Depending upon the capital category of
an institution that is not adequately capitalized, the
regulators’ corrective powers include: (i) requiring the
institution to submit a capital restoration plan; (ii) limiting
the institution’s asset growth and restricting its activities;
(iii) requiring the institution to issue additional capital
stock (including additional voting stock) or to be acquired;
(iv) restricting transactions between the institution and
its affiliates; (v) restricting the interest rate that the
institution may pay on deposits; (vi) ordering a new election
of directors of the institution; (vii) requiring that senior
executive officers or directors be dismissed; (viii) prohibiting
the institution from accepting deposits from correspondent
banks; (ix) requiring the institution to divest certain
subsidiaries; (x) prohibiting the payment of principal or
interest on subordinated debt; and (xi) ultimately,
appointing a receiver for the institution.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016: (i) the Bank exceeded
its minimum regulatory capital requirements under
OCC capital adequacy guidelines; and (ii) the Bank was
“well- capitalized,” as defined by OCC regulations. As of
December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had regulatory
capital in excess of the Federal Reserve’s requirements and
met the Dodd-Frank Act’s capital requirements.

20

TH E COM PANY

GENERAL

The Company, as the sole stockholder of the Bank, is a
financial holding company. As a financial holding company,
the Company is registered with, and is subject to regulation
by, the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”). In accordance with
Federal Reserve policy, and as now codified by the Dodd-
Frank Act, the Company is legally obligated to act as a source
of financial strength to the Bank and to commit resources
to support the Bank in circumstances where the Company
might not otherwise do so. Under the BHCA, the Company
is subject to periodic examination by the Federal Reserve.
The Company is required to file with the Federal Reserve
periodic reports of the Company’s operations and such
additional information regarding the Company and its
subsidiaries as the Federal Reserve may require.

DIVIDEND PAYMENTS

The Company’s ability to pay dividends to its stockholders
may be affected by both general corporate law
considerations and the policies of the Federal Reserve
applicable to bank holding companies. As a Delaware
corporation, the Company is subject to Delaware general

TH E BAN K

GENERAL

The Bank is a national bank, chartered by the OCC under
the National Bank Act. The deposit accounts of the Bank are
insured by the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”)
to the maximum extent provided under federal law and
FDIC regulations, and the Bank is a member of the Federal
Reserve System. As a national bank, the Bank is subject to
the examination, supervision, reporting, and enforcement
requirements of the OCC. The FDIC, as administrator of the
DIF, also has regulatory authority over the Bank.

DEPOSIT INSURANCE

As an FDIC-insured institution, the Bank is required to
pay deposit insurance premium assessments to the FDIC.
The FDIC has adopted a risk-based assessment system
whereby FDIC-insured depository institutions pay insurance
premiums at rates based on their risk classification. An
institution’s risk classification is assigned based on its
capital levels and the level of supervisory concern the
institution poses to the regulators.

The Dodd-Frank Act permanently increased the maximum
amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions,
and credit unions to $250,000 per insured depositor,
retroactive to January 1, 2009.

BANK DIVIDEND PAYMENTS

The primary source of funds for the Company is dividends
from the Bank. Under the National Bank Act, a national bank
may pay dividends out of its undivided profits in such
amounts and at such times as the bank’s board of directors
deems prudent. Without prior OCC approval, however, a
national bank may not pay dividends in any calendar year

corporation law (“DGCL”). DGCL allows the Company to pay
dividends only out of its surplus (as defined and computed
in accordance with DGCL) or, if the Company has no such
surplus, out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the
dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year.

As a general matter, the Federal Reserve has indicated
that the board of directors of a financial holding company
should eliminate, defer, or significantly reduce dividends
to stockholders if: (i) the Company’s net income available
to stockholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends
previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully
fund the dividends; (ii) the prospective rate of earnings
retention is inconsistent with the Company’s capital needs
and overall current and prospective financial condition;
or (iii) the Company will not meet, or is in danger of not
meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios.
The Federal Reserve also possesses enforcement powers
over bank holding companies and their nonbank
subsidiaries to prevent or remedy actions that represent
unsafe or unsound practices or violations of applicable
statutes and regulations. Among these powers is the ability
to proscribe the payment of dividends by banks and bank
holding companies.

that, in the aggregate, exceed the bank’s year-to-date net
income plus the bank’s retained net income for the two
preceding years.

The payment of dividends by any financial institution
is affected by the requirement to maintain adequate
capital pursuant to applicable capital adequacy guidelines
and regulations, and a financial institution generally is
prohibited from paying any dividends if, following payment
thereof, the institution would be undercapitalized. As
described above, the Bank exceeded its minimum capital
requirements under applicable guidelines as of December 31,
2017 and 2016. Notwithstanding the availability of funds
for dividends, however, the OCC may prohibit the payment
of dividends by the Bank if it determines such payment
would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.

SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS
STANDARDS/RISK MANAGEMENT

The federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines that
establish operational and managerial standards to promote
the safety and soundness of federally insured depository
institutions. The guidelines set forth standards for internal
controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan
documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure,
asset growth, compensation, fees and benefits, asset quality,
and earnings.

During the past decade, the bank regulatory agencies have
increasingly emphasized the importance of sound risk
management processes and strong internal controls when
evaluating the activities of the institutions they supervise.
Properly managing risks has been identified as critical to
the conduct of safe and sound banking activities and has

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 21

become even more important as new technologies,
product innovation, and the size and speed of financial
transactions have changed the nature of banking markets.
The agencies have identified a spectrum of risks facing a
banking institution including, but not limited to, credit,
market, liquidity, operational, legal, and reputational risk.

Information security risks for financial institutions have
generally increased in recent years in part because of
the proliferation of new technologies, the use of the
Internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct
financial transactions, and the increased sophistication
and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists,
activists, and other external parties. The Company relies
on the secure processing, transmission, and storage of
confidential information in our computer systems and

networks. Cybersecurity and the continued development
and enhancement of the controls, processes, and systems
designed to protect our networks, computers, software,
and data is a priority for the Company.

COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT
REQUIREMENTS

The Community Reinvestment Act requires the Bank to
have a continuing and affirmative obligation in a safe and
sound manner to help meet the credit needs of its entire
community, including low- and moderate- income
neighborhoods. Federal regulators regularly assess the
Bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of its
communities. Applications for additional acquisitions would
be affected by the evaluation of the Bank’s effectiveness in
meeting its Community Reinvestment Act requirements.

CONSUM ER FI NANCIAL SERVICES

There are numerous developments in federal and state laws
regarding consumer financial products and services that
impact the Bank’s business. Importantly, the current
structure of federal consumer protection regulation
applicable to all providers of consumer financial products
and services changed significantly on July 21, 2011, when
the CFPB commenced operations to supervise and enforce
consumer protection laws. The CFPB has broad rulemaking
authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that
apply to all providers of consumer products and services,
including the Bank, as well as the authority to prohibit
“unfair, deceptive, or abusive” acts and practices. The CFPB
has examination and enforcement authority over providers
with more than $10 billion in assets. Banks and savings
institutions with $10 billion or less in assets, like the Bank,
will continue to be examined by their applicable bank
regulators. Below are additional recent regulatory
developments relating to consumer mortgage lending
activities. The Company does not currently expect these
provisions to have a significant impact on Bank operations;
however, additional compliance resources were added to
monitor compliance.

ABILITY-TO-REPAY REQUIREMENT AND
QUALIFIED MORTGAGE RULE

The Dodd-Frank Act contains additional provisions that
affect consumer mortgage lending. First, it significantly
expands underwriting requirements applicable to loans
secured by 1-4 family residential real property and
augments federal law combating predatory lending

practices. In addition to numerous new disclosure
requirements, the Dodd-Frank Act imposes new standards
for mortgage loan originations on all lenders, including
banks and savings associations, in an effort to strongly
encourage lenders to verify a borrower’s ability to repay,
while also establishing a presumption of compliance for
certain “qualified mortgages.”

On January 10, 2013, the CFPB issued a final rule, effective
January 10, 2014, that implements the Dodd-Frank Act’s
ability- to-repay requirements and clarifies the presumption
of compliance for “qualified mortgages.” In assessing a
borrower’s ability to repay a mortgage-related obligation,
lenders generally must consider eight underwriting
factors: (i) current or reasonably expected income or assets;
(ii) current employment status; (iii) monthly payment on
the subject transaction; (iv) monthly payment on any
simultaneous loan; (v) monthly payment for all mortgage-
related obligations; (vi) current debt obligations, alimony,
and child support; (vii) monthly debt-to-income ratio or
residual income; and (viii) credit history. Further, the final
rule also clarifies that qualified mortgages do not include
“no-doc” loans and loans with negative amortization,
interest-only payments, balloon payments, terms in excess
of 30 years, or points and fees paid by the borrower that
exceed 3% of the loan amount, subject to certain exceptions.
In addition, for qualified mortgages, the monthly payment
must be calculated on the highest payment that will occur
in the first five years of the loan, and the borrower’s total
debt-to-income ratio generally may not be more than 43%.

22

FORWARD-LOOKI NG STATEM ENTS

The following information appears in accordance with the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:

This annual report contains forward-looking statements
about Alerus Financial Corporation. Statements that are
not historical or current facts, including statements
about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking
statements and are based on the information available to,
and assumptions and estimates made by, management
as of the date made. These forward-looking statements
cover, among other things, anticipated future revenue and
expenses and the future plans and prospects of Alerus
Financial Corporation. Forward-looking statements involve
inherent risks and uncertainties, and important factors
could cause actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated. Global and domestic economies could fail to
recover from the recent economic downturn or could
experience another severe contraction, which could
adversely affect Alerus Financial Corporation’s revenues
and the values of its assets and liabilities. Global financial
markets could experience a recurrence of significant
turbulence, which could reduce the availability of funding
to certain financial institutions and lead to a tightening
of credit, a reduction of business activity, and increased
market volatility. Alerus Financial Corporation’s results
could also be adversely affected by continued deterioration
in general business and economic conditions; changes in
interest rates; deterioration in the credit quality of its loan

portfolios or in the value of the collateral securing those
loans; deterioration in the value of securities held in its
investment securities portfolio; legal and regulatory
developments; increased competition from both banks and
non-banks; cyber-attacks; changes in client behavior and
preferences; effects of mergers and acquisitions and related
integration; effects of critical accounting policies and
judgments; and management’s ability to effectively manage
credit risk, residual value risk, market risk, operational risk,
interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and cybersecurity.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they
are made, and Alerus Financial Corporation undertakes no
obligation to update them in light of new information or
future events.

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Alerus Financial Corporation
March 2, 2018

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 23

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
At December 31,
(dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

2017
___________

2016
____________

Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Interest-bearing deposits

Cash and due from banks

Investment securities
Securities held for trading
Securities available for sale

Loans held for sale
Loans
Less allowance for loan losses

Net loans

Premises and equipment, net
Accrued interest receivable
Bank-owned life insurance
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
Deferred income taxes
Other assets

Total assets

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing
Interest-bearing

Total deposits

Short-term borrowings
Long-term debt
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

Total liabilities

Stockholders’ equity
Common stock, $1 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized;
13,699,066 and 13,534,375 issued and outstanding
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income

Total stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

40,336
81,662
___________
121,998

1,945
272,466
17,938
1,574,474
(16,564)
___________
1,557,910
21,229
6,817
29,959
27,329
31,797
9,213
38,457
___________
$ 2,137,058
___________
___________

$ 619,333
1,215,629
___________
1,834,962

30,000
58,819
32,706
___________
1,956,487

13,699
26,040
141,963
(1,131)
___________
180,571
___________
$ 2,137,058
___________
___________

$

35,441
171,926
____________
207,367

1,959
276,952
35,063
1,366,952
(15,615)
____________
1,351,337
24,262
5,919
29,139
27,329
37,506
19,521
34,225
____________
$ 2,050,579
____________
____________

$ 554,490
1,230,719
____________
1,785,209

729
58,813
37,043
____________
1,881,794

13,534
23,882
133,307
(1,938)
____________
168,785
____________
$ 2,050,579
____________
____________

24

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31,
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

Interest Income
Loans and leases, including fees
Investment securities
Taxable
Exempt from federal income taxes
Other

Total interest income

Interest Expense
Deposits
Short-term borrowings
Long-term debt

Total interest expense

Net interest income
Provision for loan losses

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

Noninterest Income
Retirement and benefit services
Wealth management
Mortgage banking
Service charges on deposit accounts
Net gain (loss) on investment securities
Other

Total noninterest income

Noninterest Expense
Salaries and incentives
Employee benefits and taxes
Net occupancy
Furniture and equipment
Intangible amortization
Other

Total noninterest expense

Income before income taxes
Income tax expense

Net income

Less preferred stock dividends
Net income applicable to common stock
Earnings per common share
Diluted earnings per common share
Dividends declared per common share
Average common shares outstanding
Diluted average common shares outstanding

2017
______________________

2016
______________________

2015
________________________

$

68,799

$

63,644

$

51,731

4,773
1,356
709
______________________
75,637

3,520
942
3,505
______________________
7,967
______________________
67,670
3,280
______________________
64,390

62,234
14,109
20,700
1,854
(13)
4,575
______________________
103,459

67,576
16,490
6,266
5,568
5,623
33,397
______________________
134,920
______________________
32,929
17,485
______________________
15,444
______________________
______________________
-
15,444
1.13
1.10
0.48
13,653
14,007

$
$
$
$

4,584
1,089
625
______________________
69,942

3,385
11
3,606
______________________
7,002
______________________
62,940
3,060
______________________
59,880

57,804
12,640
28,296
1,916
(24)
4,449
______________________
105,081

70,739
15,975
6,437
6,018
7,005
37,618
______________________
143,792
______________________
21,169
7,138
______________________
14,031
______________________
______________________
25
14,006
1.04
1.00
0.44
13,495
14,000

$
$
$
$

3,496
808
293
________________________
56,328

2,758
18
682
________________________
3,458
________________________
52,870
4,200
________________________
48,670

51,059
11,418
24,630
1,611
(17)
4,554
________________________
93,255

59,122
12,804
5,203
5,018
4,361
31,626
________________________
118,134
________________________
23,791
6,683
________________________
17,108
________________________
________________________
200
16,908
1.26
1.21
0.42
13,413
13,947

$
$
$
$

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 25

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

Balance December 31, 2014
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Common stock repurchased
Common stock issued
Preferred stock dividends
Common stock dividends
Tax benefit equity related items
Stock-based compensation expense
Vesting of restricted stock

Balance December 31, 2015

Net income
Other comprehensive income
Common stock repurchased
Common stock issued
Preferred stock dividends
Common stock dividends
Stock-based compensation expense
Vesting of restricted stock
Preferred stock redeemed

Balance December 31, 2016

Net income
Other comprehensive income
Common stock repurchased
Common stock issued
Common stock dividends
Stock-based compensation expense
Vesting of restricted stock

Balance December 31, 2017

Preferred
Stock
______________________
20
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
______________________
20

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(20)
______________________
-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
______________________
$
-
______________________
______________________

Common
Stock
______________________
$ 13,346
-
-
(1)
16
-
-
-
-
73
______________________
13,434

-
-
(18)
20
-
-
-
98
-
______________________
13,534

-
-
(16)
64
-
17
100
______________________
$ 13,699
______________________
______________________

Additional
Paid-In
Capital
______________________
$ 41,092
-
-
(26)
299
-
-
606
719
(73)
___________________
42,617

-
-
(102)
345
-
-
1,100
(98)
(19,980)
___________________
23,882

-
-
(47)
1,384
-
921
(100)
___________________
$ 26,040
___________________
___________________

Retained
Earnings
___________________
$ 115,258
17,108
-
-
-
(200)
(5,859)
(606)
-
-
___________________
125,701

14,031
-
(237)
-
(25)
(6,163)
-
-
-
___________________
133,307

15,444
172
(231)
-
(6,729)
-
-
___________________
$ 141,963
_____________________
___________________

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
___________________________________________
$ 1,370
-
(321)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
__________________________
1,049

-
(2,987)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
__________________________
(1,938)

-
807
-
-
-
-
-
__________________________
$ (1,131)
___________________________
__________________________

Total
___________________
$171,086
17,108
(321)
(27)
315
(200)
(5,859)
-
719
-
___________________
182,821

14,031
(2,987)
(357)
365
(25)
(6,163)
1,100
-
(20,000)
___________________
168,785

15,444
979
(294)
1,448
(6,729)
938
-
___________________
$180,571
___________________
___________________

26

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in thousands)

Operating Activities
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash

Deferred income taxes
Provision for loan losses
Provision for foreclosed asset losses
Depreciation and amortization
Stock-based compensation
Investment securities premium amortization
Increase in value of bank-owned life insurance
Realized loss (gain) on forward sale derivatives
Realized loss (gain) on rate lock commitments
Realized loss (gain) on sale of premises and equipment
Realized loss (gain) on sale of foreclosed assets
Realized loss (gain) on sale of investment securities
Realized loss (gain) on servicing rights
Net change in
Securities held for trading
Loans held for sale
Accrued interest receivable
Other assets
Accrued expenses and other liabilities

Net cash provided by operating activities

Investing Activities
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale
Purchases of investment securities available for sale
Net increase in loans
Net cash paid for business combinations
Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance
Purchases of premises and equipment
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets
Net cash used by investing activities

Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings
Repayments of long-term debt
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debt
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock
Cash dividends paid on common stock
Redemption of preferred stock
Repurchase of common stock
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
Net change in cash and due from banks
Cash and due from banks at beginning of year
Cash and due from banks

Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures
Loan collateral transferred to foreclosed assets
Unrealized gain/(loss) on securities available for sale
Interest paid for the period
Income tax payments net of refunds received
Noncash assets acquired
Liabilities assumed
Net noncash asset acquired
Cash and due from banks acquired

2017
______________________

2016
______________________

2015
________________________

$ 15,444

$ 14,031

$ 17,108

9,745
3,280
425
9,856
938
2,069
(820)
97
(70)
154
38
-
(743)

14
17,125
(898)
(2,136)
(6,628)
______________________
47,890

325
42,570
(38,551)
(210,286)
-
-
(2,946)
2,390
1,405
______________________
(205,093)

49,754
29,271
(168)
-
-
(6,729)
-
(294)
______________________
71,834
______________________
(85,369)
207,367
______________________
$ 121,998
______________________
______________________

2017
____________________
433
$
807
8,026
13,074
-
-
______________________
-
-

(3,044)
3,060
226
11,385
1,465
2,364
(831)
(81)
135
6
73
17
(1,293)

(12)
13,579
(1,089)
313
(6,315)
______________________
33,989

59,910
42,806
(82,487)
(38,884)
(45,441)
5,331
(1,684)
404
636
______________________
(59,409)

25,020
(6,847)
(25,000)
-
(25)
(6,163)
(20,000)
(357)
______________________
(33,372)
______________________
(58,792)
266,159
______________________
$207,367
______________________
______________________

2016
______________________
1,851
$
(2,987)
7,263
1,612
335,830
(328,748)
______________________
7,082
18,748

581
4,200
53
8,727
1,034
636
(824)
(186)
139
-
540
-
(1,178)

13
(13,600)
(56)
(2,867)
10,039
________________________
24,359

-
40,096
(27,490)
(38,723)
(4,314)
-
(3,906)
-
2,126
________________________
(32,211)

195,853
(10,532)
(125)
49,375
(200)
(5,859)
-
(27)
________________________
228,485
________________________
220,633
45,526
________________________
$ 266,159
________________________
________________________

2016
________________________
684
$
(321)
3,381
10,165
4,572
(258)
________________________
4,314
-

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 27

CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
CLAconnect.com

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT 

Board of Directors and Audit Committee 
Alerus Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries 
Grand Forks, North Dakota 

We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of 
America, the consolidated financial statements of Alerus Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries, which 
comprise  the  consolidated  balance  sheets  as  of  December  31,  2017  and  2016,  and  the  related 
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash 
flows for years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, and the related notes to the consolidated 
financial statements (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 28, 2018, we expressed 
an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. 

Opinion 
In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, statements 
of  income,  changes  in  stockholders’  equity  and  cash  flows  is  fairly  stated,  in  all  material  respects,  in 
relation to the consolidated financial statements from which it was derived. 

CliftonLarsonAllen LLP 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 
February 28, 2018 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 29

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

30

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

ALERUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 31