Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Agricultural Inputs / American Vanguard Corporation / FY2022 Annual Report

American Vanguard Corporation
Annual Report 2022

AVD · NYSE Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker AVD
Exchange NYSE
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Agricultural Inputs
Employees 845
← All annual reports
FY2022 Annual Report · American Vanguard Corporation
Loading PDF…
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For The Year Ended December 31, 2022
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For The Transition Period From                      To                      
Commission file number 001-13795
AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION
 
Delaware
95-2588080
(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
4695 MacArthur Court, Newport Beach, California
92660
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(949) 260-1200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of each class
Trading
Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.10 par value
AVD
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during 
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 
90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of 
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☒    
No  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging 
growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of 
the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
☐
 
Accelerated filer
☒
Non-accelerated filer
☐
 
Smaller reporting company
☐
Emerging growth company
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or 
revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over 
financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit 
report.  ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing 
reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by 
any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). 
☐Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates is $662.2 million. This figure is estimated as of June 30, 2022 at which 
date the closing price of the registrant’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $22.35 per share. For purposes of this calculation, shares owned by 
executive officers, directors, and 5% stockholders known to the registrant have been deemed to be owned by affiliates. The number of shares of $0.10 par value 
Common Stock outstanding as of June 30, 2022, was 30,749,184. The number of shares of $.10 par value Common Stock outstanding as of March 6, 2023 was 
29,476,112.

1
AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
December 31, 2022
Page 
No.
PART I
Item 1. 
Business .........................................................................................................................................
2
Item 1A. Risk Factors ....................................................................................................................................
10
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments ..........................................................................................................
17
Item 2. 
Properties .......................................................................................................................................
17
Item 3. 
Legal Proceedings ..........................................................................................................................
18
Item 4. 
Mine Safety Disclosures ................................................................................................................
18
 
PART II
Item 5. 
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of 
Equity Securities ............................................................................................................................
19
Item 6. 
Reserved .........................................................................................................................................
20
Item 7. 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ........
21
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk .......................................................
30
Item 8. 
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ..............................................................................
31
Item 9. 
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ........
31
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures ................................................................................................................
31
Item 9B. Other Information ..........................................................................................................................
33
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections .........................................
33
 
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance .............................................................
34
Item 11. Executive Compensation ................................................................................................................
34
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder 
Matters ...........................................................................................................................................
34
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence ..............................
34
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services ........................................................................................
34
 
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule ...................................................................................
40
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary .....................................................................................................................
38
SIGNATURES AND CERTIFICATIONS .....................................................................................................
39

2
AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
PART I
Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” 
refer to American Vanguard Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries (“AVD”).
Forward-looking statements in this report, including without limitation, statements relating to the Company’s 
plans, strategies, objectives, expectations, intentions, and adequacy of resources, are made pursuant to the safe 
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned that such forward-
looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. (Refer to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors and Part II, Item 7, 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, included in this Annual 
Report.)
All dollar amounts reflected in the consolidated financial statements are expressed in thousands, except per 
share data. 
ITEM 1 BUSINESS
American Vanguard Corporation (“AVD”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 
January 1969 and operates as a holding company. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to the 
“Company” or the “Registrant,” in this Annual Report refer to AVD. The Company conducts its business through its 
principle operating subsidiaries, including AMVAC Chemical Corporation (“AMVAC”) for its domestic business 
and AMVAC Netherlands BV (“AMVAC BV”) for its international business.
The operating subsidiaries in the U.S. include: AMVAC, GemChem, Inc. (“GemChem”), Envance 
Technologies, LLC (“Envance”), TyraTech Inc. (“TyraTech”) and OHP Inc. (“OHP”). 
Internationally, the Company operates its business through the following subsidiaries: AMVAC BV, AMVAC 
Hong Kong Limited (“AMVAC Hong Kong”), AMVAC Mexico Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada (“AMVAC 
M”), AMVAC de Costa Rica Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada (“AMVAC CR Srl”), AMVAC Singapore Pte, 
Ltd (“AMVAC Sgpr”), Grupo AgriCenter (including the parent AgriCenter S.A. and its subsidiaries) 
(“AgriCenter”), AMVAC do Brasil Representácoes Ltda (“AMVAC do Brasil”), AMVAC do Brazil 3p LTDA 
(“AMVAC 3p”), American Vanguard Australia PTY Ltd (“AVD Australia”), AgNova Technologies PTY Ltd 
(“AgNova”), and the Agrinos group (“Agrinos”).
Based on similar economic and operational characteristics, the Company’s business is aggregated into one 
reportable segment. Refer to Part II, Item 7 for selective enterprise information.
AMVAC is a California corporation that traces its history from 1945 and is a manufacturer of chemical, 
biological and biorational products that develops and markets solutions for agricultural, commercial and consumer 
uses. It synthesizes and formulates chemicals and ferments and extracts microbial products for crops, turf and 
ornamental plants, and human and animal health protection. These products, which include insecticides, fungicides, 
herbicides, soil health, plant nutrition, molluscicides, growth regulators, and soil fumigants, are marketed in liquid, 
powder, and granular forms. AMVAC primarily synthesizes, formulates, and distributes its own proprietary products 
or custom manufactures, formulates or distributes for others. In addition, the Company has carved out a leadership 
position in closed delivery systems, currently offers certain of its products in SmartBox, Lock ‘n Load and EZ Load 
systems, and its most recent commercial high technology packaging system known as SIMPAS (see “Intellectual 
Property” below) which permits the delivery of multiple products (from AMVAC and/or other companies) at 
variable rates in a single pass. AMVAC has historically expanded its business through both the acquisition of 
established chemistries, the development and commercialization of new formulations or compounds through 
licensing arrangements, the expansion of its global distribution network to gain broader market access, and self-
funded research and development of precision application technology. Beginning in 2021, we have commenced 
basic molecular research and development of intellectual property related to our green solutions portfolio.    

3
AMVAC BV is a Netherlands Corporation that was established in 2012 and is based in the Netherlands. 
AMVAC BV sells product both directly and through its network of subsidiaries in various international territories. 
Below is a description of the Company’s acquisition/licensing activity over the past three years. 
On July 1, 2021, the Company completed the purchase of certain assets from Syngenta Crop Protection related 
to the herbicide trifloxysulfuron ("Envoke"), including end-use registrations, data compensation claims, trademarks, 
formulation know-how, and books and records.
On October 8, 2020, the Company’s Australian subsidiary, AVD Australia, completed the purchase of all the 
outstanding shares of AgNova, an Australian company that sources, develops, and distributes specialty crop 
protection and production solutions for agricultural and horticultural producers and for selected non-crop users. 
AgNova has an established reputation for cost-effective product development from original concept through 
evaluation, registration, marketing, and sales, with new technologies flowing from its development pipeline. 
AgNova is committed to the provision of innovative, value-adding solutions for agriculture and related industries. 
The acquired assets included product registration, trade names and trademarks, customer lists, workforce, fixed 
assets, and existing working capital.
On October 2, 2020, the Company’s principal operating subsidiary, AMVAC, completed the purchase of all 
the outstanding shares of Agrinos from Agrinos AS, a Norwegian holding company, from a liquidation proceeding 
of that entity before a Norwegian bankruptcy court in Oslo, Norway. In addition to the shares of Agrinos, AMVAC 
acquired a bank of microbial and micronutrients, as well as about 150 pending or issued patents. Agrinos is a fully 
integrated biological input supplier with proprietary technology, manufacturing facilities, and global distribution 
capabilities. Its High Yield Technology® product platform works in conjunction with other nutritional crop inputs to 
increase crop yield, improve soil health and reduce the environmental footprint of traditional agricultural practices. 
The acquired assets included product registration, trade names and trademarks, customer lists, workforce, fixed 
assets, two factories and existing working capital.
On April 1, 2020, the Company’s principal operating subsidiary, AMVAC, acquired 6,250,000 common 
shares of Clean Seed Capital Group Ltd. (Clean Seed), representing an ownership of approximately 8%. In addition, 
AMVAC licensed from Clean Seed certain intellectual property rights related to Clean Seed’s SMART planting 
technologies. 
Seasonality
The agricultural chemical industry, in general, is cyclical in nature. The demand for AVD’s products tends to 
be seasonal. Seasonal usage, however, does not necessarily follow calendar dates, but more closely follows growing 
patterns, weather conditions, geography, weather related pressure from pests and customer marketing programs. 
Further, growing seasons vary by geographical region; thus, there is no single seasonal cycle affecting our sales. 
Rather, multiple seasons transpire over the course of the calendar year.
Backlog
AVD primarily sells its products based on purchase orders. The purchase orders are typically fulfilled within a 
short time frame. As a result, backlog is not considered a significant factor of, or a valid metric for, AVD’s business. 
The 2022 year, however, did end with a significantly larger than normal backlog of orders, primarily resulting from 
supply chain challenges on one specific product line in the last three months of 2022. 
Customers
The Company’s largest three customers accounted for 18%, 13% and 8% of the Company’s sales in 2022; 
17%, 14% and 8% in 2021; and 17%, 12% and 10% in 2020.
Distribution
In the U.S. AMVAC predominantly distributes its products through national distribution companies and 
buying groups or co-operatives, which purchase AMVAC’s goods on a purchase order basis and, in turn, sell them 
to retailers/growers/end-users. 

4
Internationally, AMVAC BV has sales offices or wholly owned distributors in Central America, Mexico, 
Brazil, Australia, and India, and sales force executives or sales agents in several other territories. The Company’s 
domestic and international distributors, agents and customers typically have long-established relationships with 
retailers/end-users, far-reaching logistics and transportation capabilities, and/or customer service expertise. The 
markets for AVD’s products vary by region, target crop, use and type of distribution channel. AVD’s customers are 
experts at addressing these various markets. 
Competition
In its many marketplaces, AVD faces competition from both domestic and foreign manufacturers. Many of 
our competitors are larger and have substantially greater financial and technical resources than AVD. AVD’s 
capacity to compete depends on its ability to develop additional applications (including delivery systems and 
precision application technologies) for its current products and/or expand its product lines and customer base. AVD 
competes principally based on quality, product efficacy, price, technical service and customer support. In some 
cases, AVD has positioned itself in smaller niche markets, which are no longer addressed by larger companies. In 
other cases, for example in the Midwest corn and soybean markets, the Company competes directly against larger 
competitors.
Manufacturing
Through its six manufacturing facilities (see Item 2, Properties), AVD synthesizes many of the technical grade 
active ingredients that are in its end-use products. Further, the Company formulates and packages its end-use 
products at four of its own facilities or at the facilities of third-party formulators in the U.S. and at various 
international locations. Two of the Company’s manufacturing facilities are biological fermentation sites, one site in 
the U.S., and one in Mexico, and, in addition, has a product manufacturing arrangement at a third-party facility in 
India.
Raw Materials
AVD utilizes numerous companies to supply the various raw materials and components used in manufacturing 
its products. Many of these materials are readily available from domestic sources. In instances where there is a 
single source of supply, AVD seeks to secure its supply by either long-term (multi-year) arrangements or purchasing 
on long lead times from its suppliers. Further, where the availability or cost of certain raw materials may be subject 
to the effect of tariffs and/or supply chain disruption, the Company may order goods at times or in volumes out of 
the ordinary course to optimize pricing and to ensure supply.
Intellectual Property
AVD’s proprietary product formulations are protected, to the extent possible, as trade secrets and, to a lesser 
extent, by patents. Certain of the Company’s closed delivery systems are patented, and the Company has both 
pending and issued patents relating to its equipment portfolio, particularly with respect to its SIMPAS and 
ULTIMUS technology. In addition, the Company owns multiple issued patents relating to both its low-impact 
Envance solutions as well as its Agrinos biological and microbial solutions. Further, AVD’s trademarks bring value 
to its products in both domestic and foreign markets. AVD considers that, in the aggregate, its product registrations, 
trademarks, licenses, customer lists and patents constitute valuable assets. While it does not regard its current 
business as being materially dependent upon any single product registration, trademark, license, or patent, it believes 
that patents will play an increasingly important role in its precision application technologies and green solutions 
portfolio.

5
EPA Registrations
In the U.S., AVD’s products also receive protection afforded by the terms of the Federal Insecticide, 
Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”), pursuant to which it is unlawful to sell any pesticide in the U.S., unless 
such pesticide has first been registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“USEPA”). Most of the 
Company’s products that are sold in the U.S. are subject to USEPA registration and periodic re-registration 
requirements and are registered in accordance with FIFRA. This registration by USEPA is based, among other 
things, on data demonstrating that the product will not cause unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the 
environment, when used according to approved label directions. In addition, each state requires a specific 
registration before any of AVD’s products can be marketed or used in that state. State registrations are 
predominantly renewed annually with a smaller number of registrations that are renewed on a multiple year basis. 
Foreign jurisdictions typically have similar registration requirements by statute. 
In addition, certain of the Company’s biological products are labeled organic under the Organic Materials 
Review Institute (“OMRI”), Washington State Department of Agriculture (“WSDA”) and/or California Department 
of Food and Agriculture (“CDFA”) and, as such, are subject to the requirements of those certification standards, 
including with respect to raw materials and processes. As is the case with synthetic products, these biological 
products are also subject to specific labeling requirements that may vary from state to state.
The USEPA, state, and foreign agencies have required, and may require in the future, that certain scientific 
data requirements be performed on registered products sold by AVD. AVD, on its own behalf and in joint efforts 
with other registrants, has furnished, and is currently furnishing, required data relative to specific products. Under 
FIFRA, the federal government requires registrants to submit a wide range of scientific data to support U.S. 
registrations, including in the case of adding labeled uses. This requirement results in operating expenses in such 
areas as regulatory compliance, with USEPA and other such bodies in the markets in which the Company sells its 
products. In addition, at times, the Company is required to generate new formulations of existing products and/or to 
produce new products in order to remain compliant. The Company expensed $18,168, $16,568 and $15,613, during 
2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, on these activities.
 
2022
2021
2020
Registration
$
12,118 $
10,612 $
10,914
Product development
6,050
5,956
4,699
Total
$
18,168 $
16,568 $
15,613
Environmental
During 2022, AMVAC continued activities to address environmental issues associated with its facility in 
Commerce, CA. (the “Facility”). An outline of the history of those activities follows.
In 1995, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (“DTSC”) conducted a Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) Facility Assessment (“RFA”) of those facilities having hazardous waste 
storage permits. In March 1997, the RFA culminated in DTSC accepting the Facility into its Expedited Remedial 
Action Program. Under this program, the Facility was required to conduct an environmental investigation and health 
risk assessment. This activity then took two paths: first, the RCRA permit closure and second, the larger site 
characterization.
With respect to the RCRA permit closure, in 1998, AMVAC began the formal process to close its hazardous 
waste permit at the Facility (which had allowed AMVAC to store hazardous waste longer than 90 days) as required 
by federal regulations. Formal regulatory closure actions began in 2005 and were completed in 2008, as evidenced 
by DTSC’s October 1, 2008, acknowledgement of AMVAC’s Closure Certification Report.

6
With respect to the larger site characterization, soil and groundwater characterization activities began in 
December 2002 in accordance with the Site Investigation Plan that was approved by DTSC. Additional activities 
were conducted from 2003 to 2014, with oversight provided by DTSC. In 2014, the Company submitted a remedial 
action plan (“RAP”) to DTSC, under the provisions of which, the Company proposed not to disturb sub-surface 
contaminants, but to continue monitoring, maintain the cover above affected soil, enter into restrictive covenants 
regarding the potential use of the property in the future, and provide financial assurances relating to the requirements 
of the RAP. In January 2017, the RAP was circulated for public comment. DTSC responded to those comments and, 
on September 29, 2017, approved the RAP as submitted by the Company. The Company continues to conduct 
groundwater monitoring and maintain the cover above affected soil. In 2022, the Company recorded land use 
covenants on certain affected parcels and continues to work with DTSC to prepare a Remedial Action Completion 
Report and to obtain further clarification on financial assurance obligations relating to the RAP. At this stage, the 
Company does not believe that costs to be incurred in connection with the RAP will be material and has not 
recorded a loss contingency for these activities.
AMVAC is subject to numerous federal and state laws and governmental regulations concerning 
environmental matters and employee health and safety at its six manufacturing facilities. The Company continually 
adapts its manufacturing process to the latest environmental control standards of the various regulatory agencies. 
The USEPA and other federal and state agencies have the authority to promulgate regulations that could have an 
impact on the Company’s operations.
AMVAC expends substantial effort to minimize the risk of discharge of materials in the environment and to 
comply with the governmental regulations relating to protection of the environment. Wherever feasible, AMVAC 
recovers and recycles raw materials and increases product yield in order to partially offset increasing pollution 
abatement costs.
The Company is committed to a long-term environmental protection program that reduces emissions of 
hazardous materials into the environment, as well as to the remediation of identified existing environmental 
concerns.
Human Capital Resources
We believe that, beyond being essential to our operations, our people have inestimable worth independent of 
our business. As outlined in our Human Rights Policy (see, www.american-vanguard.com under ESG tab), we 
believe that it is fundamental to our corporate responsibility and, indeed, to our humanity, that we recognize, respect 
and nurture the freedom and dignity of all persons. Accordingly, we have insinuated that belief throughout the fabric 
of our operations in our approach toward our employees. Indeed, the first two core values underlying our 
commitment to sustainability (see, Update to Corporate Sustainability Report, www.american-vanguard.com under 
ESG tab) are “Safety First” – which is a culture that begins with highly-regulated manufacturing plants, continues 
into the design of science-backed products and extends into market-leading delivery systems – and “Making a 
Difference” – under which, by rewarding achievement and giving our employees a voice, we attract diverse 
employees who want to make a difference in their careers, in the company and in the communities that we serve. 
Our Human Capital program consists of the following elements:
•
Board Oversight – through our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (“N&CG”), our board of 
directors oversees human capital-related risks and opportunities. At least annually, the N&CG Committee 
requires that management update succession planning for key executives, including with respect to planning 
for the future with a commitment toward diversity, equity and inclusion. 
•
Strategy and Development – the Company’s human capital strategy has two primary elements: giving our 
employees a voice and providing them with competitive benefits (including an outstanding health benefits 
plan and awards of common stock to the entire workforce). As we have covered in our Update to Corporate 
Sustainability Report, our Company is a destination for highly qualified employees who are drawn to a 
workplace where they can make a difference. Our managerial approach is that our functions work in a 
collaborative manner – cutting across departmental lines to arrive at better solutions with a high level of 
efficiency. This strategy has enabled the Company to maximize retention, even in an increasingly competitive 
employment market. 

7
•
Compensation – as mentioned in our Strategy above, compensation is an essential element of our human 
capital approach. During the pandemic in the midst of the so-called “Great Resignation” that affected many 
industries, we took measures to incentivize our workforce to remain with us, including across-the-board wage 
increases in certain of our manufacturing facilities. To the extent that our highly skilled personnel are being 
recruited by other companies, we endeavor to keep an open conversation on their needs and, where 
appropriate, have increased their total compensation (through a combination of wage, stock and/or vacation) 
to retain them.
•
Voice – our management style is to solicit good ideas from employees, involve them in implementation and 
give them recognition for ideas that succeed. For example, personnel from virtually any department (be it 
sales, technology, product development or otherwise) can submit ideas to our Innovation Review Committee 
(“IRC”) for consideration and potential funding. The IRC continues to be a source of new product ideas that 
has enabled us to launch several new formulations and other solutions on an annual basis. Similarly, our 
Beekeeper platform is a company-only social media channel on which employees anywhere in the world can 
report on their accomplishments, commendations of others and local developments. 
•
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (“DEI”) – the Company continues to expand its DEI program. And we believe 
that this commitment starts at the top. Three of nine members (33%) of our board of directors are female and 
two of nine (22%) are from underrepresented groups (LGBTQ and Latinx). Based upon the Company’s most 
current EEO-1 (“Equal Employment Opportunity”) Report, representation of African Americans in our 
domestic workforce exceeds the prevalence of that group in the national population, while representation of 
Hispanic personnel is slightly below the national average. 
•
ESG at American Vanguard - at the center of our Environmental, Social Responsibility and Governance 
commitment is the principle of Sustainable Agriculture, which, we believe, is broad enough to encompass a 
comprehensive ESG program, but clear enough to give us direction in our outlook and purpose in our 
activities. 
Sustainable Agriculture: We are committed to doing our best toward building a stable, affordable food supply 
both now and into the future. That commitment rests upon a foundation of social responsibility and equity. In that 
vein, we believe that sustainable agriculture must include these three principles:
Climate Equity – as outlined in our Climate Change Commitment, we are committed to making enterprise-
wide, progressive and measurable efforts toward helping to arrest the trend of climate change. In making 
decisions, taking actions and conducting our operations we are mindful of climate equity, which holds that 
climate change has three primary effects – generational, regional and individual. To that end, we believe that 
reducing our carbon impact and, through our products and services, enabling others to do so will advance 
climate equity consistent with the 2-degree warmer world as per the Paris Agreement. We advance this 
commitment on multiple fronts. We offer over 100 eco-friendly products – such as natural oils from Envance 
(used in Proctor & Gamble’s Zevo product line), microbial High Yield solutions from Agrinos (that enhance 
soil health and promote carbon sequestration) and tailored bionutritional products from Greenplants. In 
addition, our patented SIMPAS® precision application system, which enables a grower to dispense multiple 
crop inputs at variable rates as per an agronomist’s prescription (“only what is needed, precisely where it is 
needed”) serves to maximize yield while minimizing the environmental footprint. Further, our Ultimus® 
technology enables us to measure, record and verify (“MRV”) crop input activity anywhere on the field. When 
linked to a permanent ledger, such as Blockchain, Ultimus can generate an immutable record of a grower’s 
activity and, particularly when used with our green solution products and SIMPAS, provides the ideal solution 
for the fast-growing carbon credit market. Through these means we are endeavoring to make the planet a 
better place than we found it. 

8
Environmental Equity – we recognize that our planet has limited resources and that what we do with them has 
an effect on the habitat for both humans and other species, both for today and tomorrow. We also recognize 
that our activities can affect the environment generationally, regionally and individually. We are, therefore, 
committed to environmental equity in our operations. Specifically, and as more fully outlined in our 
sustainability reports (click on “ESG” on American-vanguard.com), we seek to conserve finite resources such 
as water, land and energy while protecting the environment and enhancing biodiversity, so that these resources 
are available in amounts and quality to support our neighbors and future generations. In addition, we have 
committed significant resources toward supporting growers with precision application technology – like 
SIMPAS and Ultimus – that enable growers to manage, optimize and trace the use of crop and soil inputs, and 
to use only what is needed, precisely where it is needed. And we are mindful of those who might be 
disproportionately affected by what we do, such as loaders and applicators of our products. To that end, we 
have been at the forefront of user-friendly, returnable, reusable closed delivery systems (from Lock ‘n Load to 
SMARTBox to SIMPAS/SmartCartridges) to minimize exposure and maximize safety for those on-the-
ground. 
Food Equity – Implicit in our commitment to sustainable agriculture is the principle of food equity, which has 
three aspects, once again, generational, regional and individual. First, food security – we believe it is essential 
to ensure the long-term sustainability and competitiveness of the Ag industry. We contribute toward food 
security by investing in both eco-friendly solutions that promote long-term soil and precision application and 
MRV technology, like SIMPAS and Ultimus, that give growers the best tools possible to ensure that their 
operations are viable, both today and tomorrow. Second, food availability – ensuring that food gets from field-
to-table. As we saw in the pandemic, the supply chain for food can be broken, and those who suffer most are 
often those farthest from the fields. To that end, we support field-to-table efforts and programs to reduce food 
waste. Third, food affordability – ensuring that food prices can be maintained for all, including the 
impoverished. We do this by giving farmers effective tools, including precision application equipment, that 
optimize their costs, boost their yield, and enable them to produce and market food at reasonable costs.  
Social Responsibility – our discussion of Sustainable Agriculture would not be complete without specific 
mention of our commitment to social responsibility. This concept is inherent in all forms of equity, be they 
climate, environmental or food related. However, social responsibility gives us pause to consider factors of a 
more fundamental nature, such as human rights. Our Human Rights Policy details our essential belief that we 
respect and support human rights, both within and article of our operations. We believe that it is fundamental 
to our corporate responsibility and, indeed, to our humanity, that we recognize, respect and nurture the 
freedom and dignity of all persons. 
Under the umbrella of Sustainable Agriculture, we are committed to operating our business with a sense of 
mindfulness – toward the climate, toward the environment and toward the good of humans and other species. 
We consider ourselves to be part of a broader mission – one of ensuring that people can rely upon a stable, 
affordable food supply both now and in the future. It is a privilege to be part of that mission. With that 
privilege comes responsibility, and we take that responsibility seriously.
The Company employed 822 employees as of December 31, 2022, and 804 employees as of December 31, 
2021. From time to time, due to the seasonality of its business, AVD uses temporary contract personnel to perform 
certain duties primarily related to packaging of its products. None of the Company’s employees are subject to a 
collective bargaining agreement. The Company believes it maintains positive relations with its employees.
Domestic operations
AMVAC is a California corporation that was incorporated under the name of Durham Chemical in August 
1945. The name of the corporation was subsequently changed to AMVAC in January 1971. As the Company’s main 
operating subsidiary, AMVAC owns and/or operates the Company’s domestic manufacturing facilities. AMVAC 
manufactures, formulates, packages and sells its products in the U.S. and is a wholly owned subsidiary of AVD.
GemChem is a California corporation that was incorporated in 1991 and was subsequently purchased by the 
Company in 1994. GemChem sells into the pharmaceutical, cosmetic and nutritional markets and, in addition, 
purchases key raw materials for the Company. GemChem is a wholly owned subsidiary of AVD.

9
2110 Davie Corporation ("DAVIE") owns real estate for corporate use only. The site is the home to the 
Company’s research center and provides accommodation for the Company’s production control team. DAVIE is a 
wholly owned subsidiary of AVD.
On October 2, 2017, AMVAC purchased substantially all the assets of OHP, a domestic distribution company 
specializing in products for the turf and ornamental market. OHP markets and sells end use products for third 
parties, either under third-party brands or else as its own label products. 
Envance is a Delaware Limited Liability Company that was formed in 2012 by AMVAC and joint venture 
partner TyraTech. Envance and TyraTech became wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company on November 9, 
2018. Envance has the rights to develop and commercialize pesticide products and technologies based on 
TyraTech’s intellectual property. Products are made from natural oils in global consumer, commercial, professional, 
crop protection and seed treatment markets. Envance is taking products to market primarily by licensing its 
intellectual property to third parties. 
International operations
AMVAC BV is a registered Dutch private limited liability company that was formed in July 2012 to manage 
foreign sales on behalf of the Company. AMVAC BV is located in the Netherlands and is a wholly owned 
subsidiary of AMVAC Hong Kong. AMVAC Hong Kong is a wholly owned subsidiary of AMVAC. During 2022, 
the international business sold the Company’s products in 45 countries, as compared to 54 countries in 2021.
AMVAC M is a wholly owned subsidiary of AMVAC BV and was originally formed in 1998 (as Quimica 
Amvac de Mexico S.A. de C.V and subsequently changed to AMVAC Mexico Sociedad de Responsabilidad 
Limitada “AMVAC M”) to conduct the Company’s business in Mexico.  
AMVAC Sgpr is a wholly owned subsidiary of AMVAC BV and was formed on April 12, 2016. This new 
entity was formed to conduct the Company’s business in the Asia Pacific and China region. 
On October 27, 2017, AMVAC BV purchased 100% of the stock of AgriCenter, which owned shares in 
subsidiaries located in Costa Rica, Panama, Nicaragua, Honduras, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Guatemala, and 
El Salvador. These affiliated entities, collectively known as AgriCenter, market, sell and distribute end-use 
chemicals, including the Company’s own products, and biological products throughout Central America primarily 
for crop applications. 
On January 10, 2019, AMVAC BV acquired 100% of the stock of Agrovant and Defensive, two distribution 
companies based in Brazil. Agrovant and Defensive marketed and distributed crop protection products and 
micronutrients with focus on the fruit and vegetable market segments throughout Brazil. On December 31, 2020, 
Agrovant and Defensive merged and the Company renamed the resulting entity AMVAC 3p.
On October 8, 2020, American Vanguard Australia Pty Ltd acquired 100% of the stock of AgNova, an 
Australian company that sources, develops, and distributes specialty crop protection and production solutions for 
agricultural and horticultural producers, and for selected non-crop users. 
On October 2, 2020, the Company’s principal operating subsidiary, AMVAC, completed the purchase of all 
outstanding shares of Agrinos and certain intellectual property rights. Agrinos is a fully integrated biological input 
supplier with proprietary technology, manufacturing, and global distribution capabilities and has operating entities in 
the U.S., Mexico, India, Brazil, China, Ukraine, and Spain.
The Company classifies as international sales all products bearing foreign labeling shipped to a foreign 
destination.
 
2022
2021
2020
International sales
$ 244,282
$ 215,439
$ 186,980
Percentage of net sales
40.1%
38.6%
40.8%
 

10
Risk Management
The Company’s Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (“ESG”) strategy is fully described on our 
website (www.american-vanguard.com); just click on the “ESG” tab. The reader will also find the Company’s 
updated Corporate Sustainability Report under the same tab. 
Available Information
The Company makes available free of charge (through its website, www.american-vanguard.com), its Annual 
Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those 
reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (“SEC”). All reports filed with the SEC are available free of charge on the SEC website, www.sec.gov. 
Also available free of charge on the Company’s website are the Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation 
Committee, Finance Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charters, the Company’s 
Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Company’s Code of Conduct and Ethics, and the Company’s Employee 
Complaint Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters. Beneath the ESG tab at that site, you will also find 
links to the Company’s Corporate Sustainability Reports, Climate Change Commitment and Human Rights Policy. 
The Company’s Internet website and the information contained therein or incorporated therein are not intended to be 
incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Supply Chain/Regulatory/Geopolitical/Tax Risks
Disruption in the global supply chain is creating delays, unavailability and adverse conditions for our 
industry, including significant price increases especially with regard to ocean bound shipments. Since the 
inception of the coronavirus pandemic, the global supply chain has been under increased stress stemming from 
container shortages, a lack of domestic truck drivers and a shift in consumer buying habits. While shipping channels 
normalized in 2022, freight costs rose to peak levels. Further, the lockdown practices arising from China’s zero-
COVID policy, followed by a lifting of those practices and widespread infection have resulted in factory capacity 
constraints and temporary closures in that country. This disruption interrupted the supply of a certain key 
intermediate ingredient for the Company’s leading corn soil insecticide during the fourth quarter of 2022, which 
contributed to lower-than-expected net sales and profit margin of the Company on a consolidated basis during that 
reporting period. While that supplier has resumed full operations, there is no guarantee that continued supply of raw 
materials and intermediates will not be impacted by further developments relating to the pandemic in that region. 
Such disruption could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations, financial condition or cash 
flows. 
The regulatory climate remains challenging to the Company’s interests both domestically and 
internationally. Various agencies within the U.S. (both federal and state) and foreign governments continue to 
exercise increased scrutiny in permitting continued uses (or the expansion of such uses) of many chemistries, 
including several of the Company’s products and, in some cases, have initiated or entertained challenges to these 
uses. The challenge of the regulatory climate is more pronounced in certain geographical regions (outside the U.S.) 
where the Company faces resistance to the continued use of certain of its products. For example, the European 
Union (“EU”) employs a hazard-based analysis when considering whether product registrations can be maintained; 
under this approach, EU regulatory authorities typically do not weigh benefit against risk in their assessments and 
routinely cancel products for which a safer alternative is available, notwithstanding the benefit of the cancelled 
product. There is no guarantee that this regulatory climate will change in the near term or that the Company will be 
able to maintain or expand the uses of many of its products in the face of such regulatory challenges.

11
Several of the Company’s organophosphates are subject to a petition to revoke tolerances under the 
FFDCA which, if granted, could result in the limitation and/or cancellation of one or more registrations for such 
products. Presently, several of the Company’s organophosphate products are under registration review before the 
USEPA and, at the same time, subject to a petition to revoke tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act ("FFDCA"). The Company continues to provide data and other analysis to USEPA in support of its registrations 
and in response to that agency’s requests for clarification. However, in the recent past, USEPA revoked tolerances 
for chlorpyrifos (an OP not sold by the Company) finding that food residues from that product could not be deemed 
with reasonable certainty to cause no harm Consequently, the agency cancelled the registrations for chlorpyrifos. 
There is no guarantee that USEPA will not make a similar finding with respect to one or more of the Company’s 
OPs, and that some or all uses of the Company’s OP products could be limited or cancelled. Accordingly, the 
Company intends to take all action necessary to defend its registrations. Such limitations and/or cancellations could 
have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s financial performance in future reporting periods.
USEPA has issued a proposed final decision ("PFD") to cancel PCNB. In mid-2022, the USEPA issued a 
“proposed final decision” (a variety of agency action heretofore unknown to registrants) to cancel the fungicide 
PCNB, which is registered by the company for use on golf courses and potatoes, among other things. The basis for 
its PFD was the agency’s initial contention that the product is persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (“PBT”). The 
Company disagrees with the agency’s contention and believes that its scientific support for those findings is flawed. 
In reaching a conclusion that a registered product is a PBT, the agency tends to focus far less on product benefit and 
far more on product risk. Further, by issuing a PFD, USEPA is, in effect, skipping two steps in the registration 
review process (namely, the preliminary interim decision and interim decision) during which the Company would 
otherwise have more time to answer the agency’s concerns and otherwise provide data necessary to support 
continued registration. In effect, then, the Company must meet a truncated schedule for defending this product, all of 
which is posted on a public docket, and is doing so under a more stringent standard of review (namely, that of a 
deemed PBT). Since making its initial determination, the agency has suggested that PCNB may merely have some 
characteristics of a PBT. There is no guarantee that the Company will succeed in persuading USEPA not to cancel 
the PCNB registration. AMVAC is the sole registrant of PCNB which it manufactures at its own facility. Loss of 
this product could have a material adverse negative effect on our operating results. 
USEPA has issued a notice of intention to suspend DCPA, the technical ingredient of an important 
herbicide registered by the company for use on high-value vegetable crops. In April 2022, USEPA issued a notice 
of intention to suspend ("NOITS") the registration for DCPA based upon the company’s alleged failure to take 
appropriate steps in responding to an extensive data call in for nearly 90 data studies. The NOITS came as a surprise 
to AMVAC, as it had been working in good faith to provide dozens of studies over several years, some of which 
were so complex that it required a review process extending to five years just to define the study protocols. The 
NOITS is currently pending before an administrative law judge ("ALJ"), who conducted a hearing on the matter in 
January 2023 and is likely to issue an order within 90-120 days. There is no guarantee that the ALJ will rule in 
AMVAC’s favor and deny the requested suspension. If AMVAC does not succeed at the NOITS hearing, there is no 
guarantee that USEPA will not seek to suspend the registration of most any product for which a data call-in is 
pending, including one or more of AMVAC’s other products. Further, a suspension of DCPA and/or other products 
could have a material, adverse effect upon the Company’s business operations and financial performance.    
Product liability judgments on glyphosate and cases involving other pesticides by domestic courts present a 
litigation risk to companies in this industry. Multiple judgments have been rendered by domestic courts in product 
liability cases against Bayer/Monsanto in connection with injuries allegedly arising from exposure to the herbicide 
product, glyphosate. The basis was purported carcinogenicity based largely upon the findings of a certain 
international organization, despite significant scientific evidence to the contrary. While the Company does not sell 
glyphosate, the theory of these results could put one or more of the Company’s products at risk. There is no 
guarantee that one or more product liability actions would not be brought against the Company on a similar basis, 
and it is possible that adverse rulings in any such actions could have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s 
financial performance in future reporting periods.
The trend of passing pesticide “ban-bills” in various states could put one or more of the Company’s 
products at risk—In certain states, including Maryland and New York, state and/or local legislatures have passed 
legislation banning the use of specific pesticides, such as chlorpyrifos, or pesticide in general, in spite of valid 
registrations at USEPA and/or the equivalent state agency. While the Company does not sell chlorpyrifos products, 
there is no guarantee that one or more of its registered products would not be targeted in state or local legislation of 
this nature. Further, such legislation could have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s financial performance 
in future reporting periods.

12
Use of the Company’s products is subject to continuing challenges from activist groups. Use of 
agrochemical products, including the Company’s products, is regularly challenged by activist groups in many 
jurisdictions under a multitude of federal, state and foreign statutes, including FIFRA, the Food Quality Protection 
Act, Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) and the Clean Water Act, to name a few. These challenges typically take the 
form of lawsuits or administrative proceedings against the USEPA and/or other federal, state or foreign agencies, the 
filing of amicus briefs in pending actions, the introduction of legislation that is inimical to the Company’s interests, 
and/or adverse comments made in response to public comment invited by regulatory agencies in the course of 
registration, re-registration or label expansion. The most prominent of these actions include a line of cases under 
which environmental groups have sought to suspend, cancel or otherwise restrict the use of pesticides that have been 
approved by USEPA on the ground that that agency failed to confer with the National Marine Fishery Service and/or 
the Fish and Wildlife Service under the ESA with respect to biological opinions relating to the use of such products. 
While industry has been active in defending registrations and proposing administrative and legislative approaches to 
address serious resource issues at the affected agencies, these cases continue to be brought. It is possible that one or 
more of these challenges could succeed, resulting in a material adverse effect upon one or more of the Company’s 
products and consolidated financial statements.
The distribution and sale of the Company’s products are subject to governmental approvals and thereafter 
ongoing governmental regulation. The Company’s products are subject to laws administered by federal, state and 
foreign governments, including regulations requiring registration, approval and labeling of its products. The labeling 
requirements restrict the use of, and type of, application for our products. More stringent restrictions could make our 
products less available, which would adversely affect our revenues and profitability and cash flows. Substantially all 
the Company’s products are subject to the USEPA (and/or similar agencies in the various territories or jurisdictions 
in which we do business) registration and re-registration requirements and are registered in accordance with FIFRA 
or similar laws. Such registration requirements are based, among other things, on data demonstrating that the 
product will not cause unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment when used according to 
approved label directions. All states, where any of the Company’s products are used, also require registration before 
products, such as the Company sells, can be marketed or used in that state. Governmental regulatory authorities have 
required, and may require in the future, that certain scientific data requirements be fulfilled on the Company’s 
products. The Company, on its behalf and also in joint efforts with other registrants, has furnished, and is currently 
furnishing certain required data relative to its products. There can be no assurance, however, that the USEPA or 
similar agencies will not request that certain tests or studies be repeated, or that more stringent legislation or 
requirements will not be imposed in the future. The Company can provide no assurance that any testing approvals or 
registrations will be granted on a timely basis, if at all, or that its resources will be adequate to meet the costs of 
regulatory compliance.
The manufacturing of the Company’s products is subject to governmental regulations. The Company 
currently owns and operates six manufacturing facilities which are located in Los Angeles, California; Axis, 
Alabama; Hannibal, Missouri; Marsing, Idaho; Clackamas, Oregon; and Etchojoa, Mexico (the “Facilities”). The 
Facilities operate under the laws and regulations imposed by relevant country, state and local authorities. The 
manufacturing of key ingredients for certain of the Company’s products occurs at the Facilities. An inability to 
renew or maintain a license or permit, or a significant increase in the fees for such licenses or permits, could impede 
the Company’s manufacture of one or more of its products and/or increase the cost of production; this, in turn, 
would materially and adversely affect the Company’s ability to provide customers with its products in a timely and 
affordable manner.
A change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their interpretation or application, could have a negative 
impact on our business and results of operations. We operate in many different countries and in many states within 
the United States, and we are subject to changes in applicable tax laws, treaties or regulations in the jurisdictions in 
which we operate. A material change in these tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their interpretation or application, 
could have a negative impact on our business and results of operations. On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction 
Act of 2022 (the "IRA") was signed into law. The IRA contains several revisions to the Internal Revenue Code, 
including a 15% corporate minimum income tax for corporations with average annual adjusted financial statement 
income over a three-tax-year period in excess of $1 billion and is effective for the tax years beginning after 
December 31, 2022, a 1% excise tax on stock repurchases made by publicly traded U.S. corporations after 
December 31, 2022, and business tax credits and incentives for the development of clean energy projects and the 
production of clean energy. At this time, we do not expect the IRA will have a material impact on our consolidated 
financial statements. However, any future stock repurchase of our common stock will be subject to the new excise 
tax law.

13
Pandemic/Climate/Geopolitical Risks
The COVID-19 pandemic is creating risk, uncertainties and adverse conditions in many industries both 
here and abroad. The Company is closely monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on all aspects of its 
business, including how the pandemic is impacting its customers, business partners, and employees. While the 
Company did not incur significant disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic during the years ended December 31, 
2022, 2021, and 2020 the Company is unable to predict the impact that the pandemic will have on its future financial 
condition, results of operations and cash flows due to numerous uncertainties. The extent to which the COVID-19 
pandemic impacts the Company’s operations and those of its customers will depend on future developments, which 
are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the scope, severity and duration of the 
pandemic, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, and the direct and indirect economic 
effects of the pandemic and containment measures, among others. There is no guarantee that the Company will be 
able to operate without material disruption for the duration of the pandemic or that its financial conditions and 
results of operations and cash flows will not be materially adversely affected by the pandemic in future periods.
Climate Change may adversely affect the Company’s business. Over the course of the past several years, 
global climate conditions have become increasingly inconsistent, volatile and unpredictable. Many of the regions in 
which the Company does business have experienced excessive moisture, cold, drought and/or heat of an 
unprecedented nature at various times of the year. In some cases, these conditions have either reduced or obviated 
the need for the Company’s products, whether pre-plant, at-plant, post-emergent or at harvest. Further, the random 
nature of climactic change has made it increasingly difficult to forecast market demand and, consequently, financial 
performance, from year-to-year. There is no guarantee that climate change will abate in the near future, and it is 
possible that such change will continue to hinder the Company’s ability to forecast its sales performance with 
accuracy and otherwise adversely affect the Company’s financial performance. 
The Company’s business may be adversely affected by weather effects and commodity prices. Demand for 
many of the Company’s products tends to vary with weather conditions and weather-related pressure from pests. 
Adverse weather conditions, then, may reduce the Company’s revenues and profitability. In light of the possibility 
of adverse seasonal effects, there can be no assurance that the Company will maintain sales performance at historical 
levels in any particular region. Similarly, demand for the Company’s products used in row crops tends to vary with 
the commodity prices of those crops, for instance, corn, soybeans and cotton. These prices may be driven in part by 
weather, pest pressure, the domestic farm economy and international markets (e.g., yield and pricing from similar 
crops grown in Brazil). There is no guarantee that the farm economy and row crop commodity prices will maintain 
sufficient strength and stability to support the Company’s products at or above historical levels.  
The Russian invasion of Ukraine may expand into a broader international conflict that could adversely 
affect multiple channels of commerce and markets. While business operations relating to Ukraine constitute an 
immaterial part of the Company’s overall business, there is no guarantee that the current conflict will not draw 
military intervention from other countries or retaliation from Russia, which, in turn, could lead to a much larger 
conflict. If such escalation should occur, supply chain, trade routes and markets currently served by the Company 
could be adversely affected, which, in turn, could materially, adversely affect the Company’s business operations 
and financial performance. 
The Company may be subject to environmental liabilities. The Company is fully committed toward 
minimizing the risk of discharge of materials into the environment and to complying with governmental regulations 
relating to protection of the environment, its neighbors and its workforce. Nevertheless, federal and state authorities 
may seek fines and penalties for any violation of the various laws and governmental regulations. In addition, while 
the Company continually adapts its manufacturing processes to the latest environmental control standards of 
regulatory authorities, it cannot entirely eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or injury from hazardous or 
regulated materials. In short, the Company may be held liable for significant damages or fines relating to any 
environmental contamination, injury, or compliance violation which could have a material adverse effect on the 
Company’s consolidated financial condition, statements of operations and cash flows.

14
Acquisition/Investment Risks
Newly acquired businesses or product lines may not generate forecasted results. While the Company 
conducts due diligence using a combination of internal and third-party resources and applies what it believes to be 
appropriate criteria for each transaction before making acquisitions, there is no guarantee that a business or product 
line acquired by the Company will generate results that meet or exceed results that were forecasted by the Company 
when evaluating the acquisition. There are many factors that could affect the performance of a newly acquired 
business or product line. While the Company uses assumptions that are based upon due diligence and other market 
information in valuing a business or product line prior to concluding an acquisition, actual results generated post-
closing could vary widely from the Company’s forecast and, as such, could have a material effect upon the 
Company’s overall financial performance.
The Company’s investment in foreign businesses may pose additional risks. With the expansion of its 
footprint internationally, the Company now carries on business at a material level in some jurisdictions that have a 
history of political, economic or currency-related instability and customers with a potentially higher risk profile 
regarding accounts receivable collectability, as compared to the Company’s legacy business. While such instability 
may not be present at the current time, there is no guarantee that conditions will not change in one or more 
jurisdictions quickly and without notice, nor is there any guarantee that the Company would be able to recoup its 
investment in such territories in light of such changes and potential losses due to political factors, economic factors, 
devaluation of local currencies, or the collectability risk from customers. Adverse changes of this nature could have 
a material effect upon the Company’s overall financial performance.
The Company’s investment in technology may not generate forecasted returns. The Company has had a 
history of investing in technological innovation, including with respect to precision application technologies (such as 
SIMPAS and Ultimus), natural oil technology and biologicals, as one of its core strategies. These investments are 
based upon the premise that new technology will allow for safer handling or lower overall toxicity profile of the 
Company’s product portfolio, appeal to regulatory agencies and the market we serve, gain commercial acceptance, 
and command a return that is sufficiently in excess of the investment. However, there is no guarantee that a new 
technology will be successfully commercialized, generate a material return or maintain market appeal. Further, 
many types of development costs must be expensed in the period in which they are incurred. This, in turn, tends to 
put downward pressure on period profitability. There can be no assurance that these expenses will be recovered 
through successful long-term commercialization of a new technology.
The Company’s growth has been fueled in part by acquisitions. Over the past few decades, the Company’s 
growth has been driven by acquisitions and licensing of both established and developmental products from third 
parties. There is no guarantee that acquisition targets or licensing opportunities meeting the Company’s investment 
criteria will remain available or will be affordable. If such opportunities do not present themselves, then the 
Company may be unable to duplicate historical growth rates in future years.
The Company is dependent upon sole source suppliers for certain of its raw materials and active 
ingredients. There are a limited number of suppliers of certain important raw materials used by the Company in a 
number of its products. Certain of these raw materials are available solely from single sources either domestically or 
overseas. In connection with supply chain disruptions in 2021, phosphorus and related compounds were increasingly 
difficult to source for our entire industry; ensuring a continuous supply required extraordinary efforts both with 
respect to sourcing and production planning. In the last quarter of 2022, there was a temporary supply chain shortage 
of one key raw material of the Company’s largest corn soil insecticide, Aztec. That said, there is no guarantee that 
any of our suppliers will be willing or able to supply these products to the Company reliably, continuously and at the 
levels anticipated by the Company or required by the market. If these sources prove to be unreliable and the 
Company is not able to supplant or otherwise second source these products, it is possible that the Company will not 
achieve its projected sales which, in turn, could adversely affect the Company's consolidated financial statements. 
The Company faces competition from generic competitors that source product from countries having lower 
cost structures. The Company continues to face competition from competitors around the globe that may enter the 
market through either offers to pay data compensation, or similar means in foreign jurisdictions, and then 
subsequently source material from countries having lower cost structures (typically India and China). These 
competitors typically tend to operate at thinner gross margins and, with low costs of goods, tend to drive pricing and 
profitability of subject product lines downward. There is no guarantee that the Company will maintain market share 
and pricing when facing such generic competitors, or that such competitors will not offer generic versions of the 
Company’s products in the future.

15
The Company’s key customers typically carry competing product lines and may be influenced by the 
Company’s larger competitors. A significant portion of the Company’s products are sold to national distributors in 
the U.S., which also carry product lines of competitors that are much larger than the Company. Typically, revenues 
from the sales of these competitor product lines and related program incentives constitute a greater part of our 
distributors’ income than do revenues from sales and program incentives arising from the Company’s product lines. 
With the recent consolidation among domestic distribution companies, these considerations have become more 
pronounced. In light of these facts, there is no assurance that such customers will continue to market our products 
aggressively or successfully, or that the Company will be able to influence such customers to continue to purchase 
our products instead of those of our competitors.
Industry consolidation may threaten the Company’s position in various markets. The global agricultural 
chemical industry continues to undergo significant consolidation. Many of the Company’s competitors have grown 
or are expected to grow through mergers and acquisitions. As a result, these competitors will tend to be in position 
to realize greater economies of scale, offer more diverse portfolios and thereby exert greater influence throughout 
the distribution channels. Consequently, the Company may find it more difficult to compete in various markets. 
While such merger activity may generate acquisition opportunities for the Company, there is no guarantee that the 
Company will benefit from such opportunities. Further, there is a risk that the Company’s future performance may 
be hindered by the growth of its competitors through consolidation.
The Company is dependent on a limited number of customers, which makes it vulnerable to the continued 
relationship with and financial health of those customers. Our top three customers accounted for 39% of the 
Company’s sales in 2022, 2021 and 2020. The Company’s future prospects may depend on the continued business 
of such customers and on our continued status as a qualified supplier to such customers. The Company cannot 
guarantee that these key customers will continue to buy products from us at current levels. The loss of a key 
customer could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
General Risks
The carrying value of certain assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets may be subject to 
impairment depending upon market trends and other factors—The Company regularly reviews the carrying value 
of certain assets, including long-lived assets, inventory, fixed assets and intangibles. Depending upon the class of 
assets in question, the Company takes into account various factors including, among others, sales, trends, market 
conditions, cash flows, profit margins and the like. Based upon this analysis, where circumstances warrant, the 
Company may leave such carrying values unchanged or adjust them as appropriate. There is no guarantee that these 
carrying values can be maintained indefinitely, and it is possible that one or more such assets could be subject to 
impairment which, in turn, could have an adverse impact upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s computing systems are subject to cyber security risks. In the course of its operations the 
Company relies on its computing systems, including access to the internet, the use of third-party applications and the 
storage and transmission of data through such systems. While the Company has implemented security measures to 
protect these systems, there is no guarantee that a third-party will not penetrate these defenses through hacking, 
phishing or otherwise and either compromise, corrupt or shut down these systems. Further, in the event of such 
incursion it is possible that confidential business information and private personal data could be taken. Such an 
event could adversely affect both the Company’s ability to operate, its reputation with key stakeholders and its 
overall financial performance.

16
Reduced financial performance may limit the Company’s ability to borrow under its credit facility. The 
Company has historically grown net sales and net income through the expansion of current product lines, the 
acquisition of product lines from third parties and the acquisition of both domestic and international distributors with 
strong niche market positions. In order to finance such acquisitions, the Company has drawn upon its senior credit 
facility. However, the Company’s borrowing capacity under the senior credit facility depends, in part, upon its 
satisfaction of a negative covenant that sets a maximum ratio of borrowed debt to earnings (as measured over the 
trailing 12-month period). There is no guarantee that the Company will continue to generate earnings necessary to 
ensure that it has sufficient borrowing capacity to support future acquisitions or that, when necessary, the lender 
group will amend the senior credit facility to provide for such borrowing capacity. Further, despite the Company’s 
long-standing relationship with its lenders, in light of the uncertainties in global financial markets, there is no 
guarantee that the Company’s lenders will be either willing or able to continue lending to the Company at such rates 
and in such amounts as may be necessary to meet the Company’s working capital needs.
The Company is subject to taxation related risks in multiple jurisdiction. The Company is a U.S. based 
multinational company subject to tax in multiple U.S. and foreign tax jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required 
in determining our global provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets or liabilities and in evaluating our tax 
positions on a worldwide basis. While we believe our tax positions are consistent with the tax laws in the 
jurisdictions in which we conduct our business, it is possible that these positions may be contested or overturned by 
jurisdictional tax authorities, which may have a significant impact on our global provision for income taxes. Tax 
laws are dynamic and subject to change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or 
applied. In 2017, the U.S. enacted significant tax reform, and in the long-term certain provisions of the new law may 
adversely affect us. In addition, governmental tax authorities are increasingly scrutinizing the tax positions of 
companies. Many countries in the EU, as well as a number of other countries and organizations such as the 
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, are actively considering changes to existing tax laws 
that, if enacted, could increase our tax obligations in countries where we do business. If U.S. or other foreign tax 
authorities change applicable tax laws, our overall taxes could increase, and our business, financial condition, results 
of operations, or cash flows may be adversely impacted. 
To the extent that capacity utilization is not fully realized at its manufacturing facilities, the Company may 
experience lower profitability. While the Company endeavors continuously to maximize utilization of its 
manufacturing facilities, our success in these endeavors is dependent upon many factors, including fluctuating 
market conditions, product life cycles, weather conditions in our key markets, availability of raw materials, 
manufacturing equipment performance, retention of the workforce and regulatory constraints, among other things. 
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to maximize the utilization of its manufacturing facilities. 
Underutilization of such manufacturing resources could have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s 
financial performance.  
The Company’s continued success depends, in part, upon a limited number of key employees. Within 
certain functions, the Company relies heavily on a small number of key employees to manage ongoing operations 
and to perform strategic planning. In some cases, there are no internal candidates who are qualified to succeed these 
key personnel in the short term. In the event that the Company were to lose one or more key employees, there is no 
guarantee that Company could replace them with people having comparable skills. Further, the loss of key personnel 
could adversely affect the operation of our business.
Domestic and regional inflation trends, increased interest rates and other factors could lead to the erosion 
of economies and adversely impact the Company. Both the US and many other countries are experiencing inflation, 
which, in turn, is leading to increased costs in multiple industry segments, including agriculture and related 
industries. The persistence of inflation has led central bankers to increase interest rates within their regions. There is 
no guarantee that these measures will arrest the inflationary trend. Further, these factors, taken together with reduced 
productivity and constraints on the labor supply could lead to recessionary periods in the regions in which the 
Company does business. While the Company takes measures within its control to manage the effects of inflation, 
higher interest rates and other factors, ultimately, they are outside of the Company’s control. Further, the persistence 
and/or severity of one or more of them could adversely affect the financial performance and/or operations of the 
Company.

17
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None
ITEM  2 PROPERTIES
AMVAC owns in fee the Facility constituting approximately 152,000 square feet of improved land in 
Commerce, California (“Commerce”) on which its West Coast manufacturing, some of its warehouse facilities and 
some of its manufacturing administrative offices are located.
DAVIE owns in fee approximately 72,000 square feet of warehouse, office and laboratory space on 
approximately 118,000 square feet of land in Commerce, California, which is leased to AMVAC. In 2013, the 
Company made a significant investment in the Glenn A. Wintemute Research Center, which houses the Company’s 
primary research laboratory supporting synthesis, formulation and other new product endeavors.
In 2001, AMVAC completed the acquisition of a manufacturing facility (the “Axis Facility”) from E.I. 
DuPont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”). The Axis Facility was one of three such units located on DuPont’s 
510-acre complex in Axis, Alabama. The acquisition consisted of a long-term ground lease of 25 acres and the 
purchase of all improvements thereon. The facility is a multi-purpose plant designed for synthesis of active 
ingredients and formulation and packaging of finished products. In 2018, FMC Corporation acquired from DuPont a 
business unit, which held, among other things, the Axis Facility. Prior to expiration of the lease, AMVAC and FMC 
negotiated the terms of a new lease, which has a term of 15 years and the option to renew for two, 5-year periods. 
On December 28, 2007, AMVAC purchased certain manufacturing assets relating to the production of Thimet 
and Counter and located at BASF’s multi-plant facility situated in Hannibal, Missouri (the “Hannibal Site”). Subject 
to the terms and conditions of the Agreement, AMVAC purchased certain buildings, manufacturing equipment, 
office equipment, fixtures, supplies, records, raw materials, intermediates and packaging constituting the “T/C Unit” 
of the Hannibal Site. The parties entered into a ground lease and a manufacturing and shared services agreement, 
under which BASF continues to supply various shared services to AMVAC for the Hannibal Site.
On March 7, 2008, AMVAC acquired from Bayer CropScience Limited Partnership, (“BCS LP”), a U.S. 
business of Bayer CropScience GmbH, a facility (the “Marsing Facility”) located in Marsing, Idaho, which consists 
of approximately 17 acres of improved real property. The Marsing Facility is engaged in the blending of liquid and 
powder raw materials and the packaging of some of the Company’s finished goods inventory in liquid, powder and 
pelletized formulations which are sold both in the U.S. and internationally. In addition, during 2019, the Company 
purchased approximately three acres of unimproved real estate immediately adjacent to the Marsing Facility for 
potential storage and operational use in the future.   
On October 2, 2020, AMVAC completed the purchase of all outstanding shares of Agrinos which is a fully 
integrated biological input supplier with proprietary technology, internal manufacturing, and global distribution 
capabilities. Its High Yield Technology® product platform works in conjunction with other nutritional crop inputs to 
increase crop yield, improve soil health and reduce the environmental footprint of traditional agricultural practices. 
Agrinos has two primary biological production facilities, a state-of-the-art microbial fermentation facility based in 
Clackamas, Oregon, and a facility in Sonora, Mexico. The Clackamas and Sonora facilities are used as both 
manufacturing sites, and operational centers for global supply chain and logistics.  

18
AVD regularly adds chemical processing equipment to enhance or expand its production capabilities. The 
Company believes its facilities are in good operating condition, are suitable and adequate for current needs and have 
flexibility to change products. Facilities and equipment are insured against losses from fire as well as other usual 
business risks. The Company knows of no material defects in title to, or encumbrances on, any of its properties 
except that substantially all of the Company’s assets are pledged as collateral under the Company’s credit facility 
agreements with its primary lender group. For further information, refer to Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated 
Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
AVD owns approximately 42 acres of unimproved land in Texas for possible future expansion.
The Company leases approximately 19,953 square feet of office space located at 4695 MacArthur Court in 
Newport Beach, California. In 2020, the lease was amended and was extended to expire on June 30, 2026. The 
premises have served as the Company’s corporate headquarters since 1995.
The facilities occupied by GemChem, OHP, Envance and TyraTech (Envance and TyraTech are co-located), 
AMVAC BV, AMVAC M, AMVAC CR Srl, AMVAC Sgpr, AgNova, Agrinos, AMVAC 3p and AgriCenter, 
consist of administration, development centers (in the case of Envance and TyraTech) and/or sales offices which are 
leased. In addition, AMVAC 3p leases warehouse space in Jaboticabal, Brazil.
ITEM  3 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Please refer to Note 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, item 8 of this Annual 
Report on Form 10-K.  
ITEM 4 MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable.

19
PART II
ITEM  5 MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Effective March 7, 2006, the Company listed its $0.10 par value common stock (“Common Stock”) on the 
New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol AVD. From January 1998 through March 6, 2006, the Common 
Stock was listed on the American Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol AVD. The Company’s Common Stock 
traded on The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol AMGD from March 1987 through January 1998. 
Holders
As of March 6, 2023, the number of stockholders of the Company’s Common Stock was approximately 
12,533, which includes beneficial owners with shares held in brokerage accounts under street name and nominees.
Dividends
The Company has issued a cash dividend in each of the last twenty-four years dating back to 1996. Cash 
dividends declared during the past three years are summarized in the table below.
 
Declaration Date
Record Date
Distribution Date
Dividend
Per Share
Total
Paid
December 12, 2022
December 28, 2022
January 11, 2023
$
0.030
$
851
September 12, 2022
September 23, 2022
October 7, 2022
0.025
715
June 6, 2022
June 24, 2022
July 8, 2022
0.025
742
March 14, 2022
March 25, 2022
April 15, 2022
0.025
736
Total 2022
$
0.105
$
3,044
December 13, 2021
December 27, 2021
January 10, 2022
$
0.020
$
594
September 13, 2021
October 1, 2021
October 15, 2021
0.020
594
June 8, 2021
June 24, 2021
July 8, 2021
0.020
600
March 10, 2021
March 15, 2021
April 15, 2021
0.020
596
Total 2021
$
0.080
$
2,384
December 7, 2020
December 23, 2020
January 6, 2021
$
0.020
$
592
March 9, 2020
March 26, 2020
April 16, 2020
0.020
586
Total 2020
$
0.040
$
1,178
Share Repurchase Programs
The Company periodically repurchases shares of its common stock under board-authorized repurchase 
programs through a combination of open market transactions and accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) 
arrangements.
On August 22, 2022, pursuant to a Board of Directors resolution, the Company entered into an ASR to 
repurchase $20,000 of its common stock. Under the ASR agreement, the Company paid $20,000 and immediately 
received an initial delivery of 802,810 shares in the amount of $16,000, based on a price of $19.93 per share, which 
represented 80% of the notional amount of the ASR based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on 
the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") on August 22, 2022. On December 14, 2022, the ASR was completed, and 
pursuant to the settlement terms of the ASR, the Company received an additional 131,892 shares of its common 
stock. The average price paid for all of the shares delivered under the ASR was $21.40 per share.
On March 8, 2022, pursuant to a Board of Directors resolution, the Company announced its intention to 
repurchase an aggregate number of up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock under a 10b5-1 plan, par value $0.10 
per share, in the open market over the succeeding one year, subject to limitations and restrictions under applicable 
securities laws. During 2022, the Company purchased 734,150 shares of its common stock for a total of $14,002 at 
an average price of $19.07 per share.

20
On August 30, 2021, pursuant to a Board of Directors resolution, the Company announced its intention to 
repurchase an aggregate number of 300,000 shares of its common stock under a 10b5-1 plan, par value $0.10 per 
share, in the open market over the succeeding six months. During 2021, the Company purchased 300,000 shares of 
its common stock for a total of $4,579 at an average price of $15.26 per share.  
The table below summarized the number of shares of our common stock that were repurchased during the 
years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. The Company did not repurchase any of its common stock in 2020. 
Year ended
Total number of
shares purchased
Average price paid
per share
Total amount paid
December 31, 2022
1,668,852
$
20.37
$
34,002
December 31, 2021
300,000
$
15.26
$
4,579
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
Plan Category
Number of securities 
to
be issued upon 
exercise
of outstanding 
options,
warrants, and rights
Weighted average 
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants, rights
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans 
approved by security holders
150,704 $
11.49
1,524,567
Total
150,704 $
11.49
1,524,567
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph presents a comparison of the cumulative, five-year total return for the Company, the 
Russell 2000 Stock Index, and a peer group (S&P 400 Specialty Chemical Industry). The graph assumes that the 
beginning values of the investments in the Company, the Russell 2000 Stock Index, and the S&P 400 Specialty 
Chemical Index (a peer group of companies) each was $100 on December 31, 2017. All calculations assume 
reinvestment of dividends. Returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future returns.
ITEM 6 RESERVED
Not applicable

21
ITEM  7 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS/RISK FACTORS:
The Company, from time-to-time, may discuss forward-looking statements including assumptions concerning 
the Company’s operations, future results and prospects. Generally, “may,” “could,” “will,” “would,” “expect,” 
“believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “continue” and similar words identify forward-looking statements. 
Forward-looking statements appearing in this Report are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private 
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and are 
subject to risks and uncertainties that can cause actual results and events to differ materially from those set forth in 
or implied by the forward-looking statements and related assumptions contained in the entire Report. Such factors 
include, but are not limited to: product demand and market acceptance risks; the effect of economic conditions; 
weather conditions; changes in regulatory policy; the impact of competitive products and pricing; changes in foreign 
exchange rates; product development and commercialization difficulties; capacity and supply constraints or 
difficulties; availability of capital resources; general business regulations, including taxes and other risks as detailed 
from time-to-time in the Company’s reports and filings filed with the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission 
(“SEC”). It is not possible to foresee or identify all such factors. We urge you to consider these factors carefully in 
evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this Report.
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for 2022, as compared to 2021 
appears below. As permitted by SEC rules, we have omitted the discussion and analysis of our financial condition 
and results of operations for 2021 compared to 2020. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussions and Analysis of 
Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 
31, 2021, for this discussion.  
MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW
The Company’s performance in 2022 was stronger in most all respects as compared to the prior year. The 
domestic agricultural economy continued its second upcycle year following a multi-year downcycle that concluded 
at the end of 2020. With that trend, commodity prices for many crops, including corn, soybeans and cotton, rose and 
remained strong. Further, with greater confidence in the post-pandemic agricultural and chemical market and 
improved availability within the shipping industry, growers and distribution relaxed their procurement patterns from 
a mode of ordering months in advance of the planting season (in 2021) to more of a just-in-time approach (in 2022). 
While the Company had enjoyed a strong growth trajectory for the first three quarters of 2022, that curve flattened 
during the fourth quarter, as temporary supply chain disruptions (described below) prevented the production and sale 
of the Company’s leading corn soil insecticide during that period. It is also worth noting that, while shipping 
services had become more readily available during 2022, the cost of freight rose to its highest point since the start of 
the pandemic. We expect that those costs will recede to more normalized levels in 2023.
In summary, net sales for 2022 rose 9%, as compared to 2021 (to $609,615 from $557,676), and net income 
was up about 43% (to $26,618 from $18,587). Operating income rose 31% (to $40,651 in 2022 from $30,946 in 
2021). With respect to our businesses, net sales of our U.S. Crop rose by 9%, while gross profit rose 22%. In the 
U.S., non-Crop net sales declined by 2%, while gross profit dropped by 6%. Our international business increased net 
sales by 13% and gross profit by 9%.   
As a result of the sales dynamics just described, gross profit during 2022 was approximately 13% above that 
of 2021 ($241,352 vs. $214,047). Further, gross profit when expressed as a percentage of sales was 40%, as 
compared to 38% in the prior year. Operating expenses increased by 10% ending at $200,701 as compared to 
$183,272 in 2021. Further, operating expenses (which include outbound freight) as a percent of net sales remained 
flat at 33%, as compared to 2021. 
Despite numerous increases in the interest rate by the Federal Open Market Committee over the course of the 
year, our interest expense remained approximately even with that of the prior year ($3,954 in 2022 vs. $3,687 in 
2021). This performance was due to timing of our borrowings, continued strong cash generated from increased sales, 
continued focus on working capital management and a high level of participation by customers in our prepayment 
programs. For 2022, our effective tax rate decreased (at 23.8% in 2022 vs. 30.1% in 2021). Our net income was 
$27,404 in 2022, as compared to $18,587 in 2021, which represents an increase of about 47%.

22
When considering the consolidated balance sheets, long-term debt decreased to $51,477 as of December 31, 
2022, from $52,240 as of December 31, 2021. The decreased level of debt was driven by the Company’s strong cash 
management during 2022, including a continued strong response from the Company’s largest customers to our 
early-pay programs, offset by the decision to repurchase $34,002 of the Company's stock. The Company’s liquidity 
position improved to $200,372 as of December 31, 2022, as compared to $178,705 as of December 31, 2021. 
Results of Operations
2022 Compared with 2021:
2022
2021
$ Change
% Change
Net sales:
U.S. crop
$ 288,624
$ 263,632
$
24,992
9%
U.S. non-crop
76,709
78,605
(1,896)
-2%
Total U.S.
365,333
342,237
23,096
7%
International
244,282
215,439
28,843
13%
Total net sales
$ 609,615
$ 557,676
$
51,939
9%
Cost of sales:
U.S. crop
$ 156,115
$ 154,064
$
2,051
1%
U.S. non-crop
41,452
41,162
290
1%
Total U.S.
197,567
195,226
2,341
1%
International
170,696
148,403
22,293
15%
Total cost of sales
$ 368,263
$ 343,629
$
24,634
7%
Gross profit:
U.S. crop
$ 132,509
$ 109,568
$
22,941
21%
U.S. non-crop
35,257
37,443
(2,186)
-6%
Total U.S.
167,766
147,011
20,755
14%
International
73,586
67,036
6,550
10%
Total gross profit
$ 241,352
$ 214,047
$
27,305
13%
Gross margin:
U.S. crop
46%
42%
U.S. non-crop
46%
48%
Total U.S.
46%
43%
International
30%
31%
Total gross margin
40%
38%
Net sales of our U.S. crop business were about 9% higher than those of the prior year ($288,624 vs. 
$263,632). With the second full year of high commodity prices and a strong farm economy, the Company 
experienced strong demand for its crop protection products. The pacing of procurement practices in the distribution 
channel, however, relaxed from advance purchasing in 2021 (for the 2021-2022 season) to more of a just-in-time 
approach in 2022 (for the 2022-2023 season). The Company experienced strong sales of its corn products, 
particularly soil insecticides and post-emergent herbicides (Impact, Impact Core, Sinate, and Impact Z) 
notwithstanding a 20% drop in sales of our leading corn soil insecticide, Aztec, which we were unable to make and 
sell in the fourth quarter of 2022, due to unavailability of a key intermediate from both a domestic supplier (which 
experienced capacity constraints) and a China-based supplier (which experienced widespread COVID infection 
followed by a temporary shutdown). With respect to our cotton products, strong commodity prices stimulated 
demand for our Bidrin foliar insecticides and Folex harvest defoliant, which together generated sales that were up 
33%, as compared to those of 2021. We also recorded stronger sales of our soil fumigants (for use on a wide range 
of fruit and vegetables), Thimet (for use of peanuts and sugar beets), our herbicide, Dacthal (for use on high-value 
crops, including onions) and our soybean herbicide products.
Cost of sales within the domestic crop business was flat compared to 2021, on sales that increased 9%, gross 
profit improved by 21% ($132,509 in 2022 vs. $109,568 in 2021), and gross margin was 46% of sales as compared 
to 42% last year. 

23
Net sales of our U.S. non-crop business were down about 2% ($76,709 in 2022 vs. $78,605 in 2021).  This 
decline was driven primarily by the nationwide consumer pest-control market, which dropped by 30% year-over-
year, due to US workers returning to the workplace post-COVID. Net sales from our OHP nursery and ornamental 
business were about even with those of 2021, as US consumer demand for plant materials remained level. During 
2022, we posted relatively flat Dibrom® mosquito adulticide sales. By contrast, sales of insecticides for commercial 
applications rose during the year, as the professional pest-control market began to regain its footing. Finally, 
TyraTech/Envance extended the scope of a license agreement in 2021 and benefited from a one-time non-refundable 
up-front fee.
Cost of sales in our U.S. non-crop business remained flat with the prior year and gross profit decreased by 6% 
(to $35,257 in 2022 from $37,443 in 2021), and gross margin percentage decreased to 46% in 2022, as compared to 
48% in 2021. 
Net sales of our international businesses increased by 13% in 2022 ($244,282 vs. $215,439 in 2021). During 
2022, our international group continued to successfully integrate two important new businesses, AgNova in 
Australia, and Agrinos biological products in more than a half dozen countries worldwide. We enjoyed strong 
demand for our soil fumigants, particularly in Mexico and Australia, and experienced increased sales of our Counter 
nematicide in Brazil. Further, we experienced higher sales in our AgriCenter Central American distribution business 
and achieved a record $100 million in net sales from our LATAM region. Expansion of our Green Solutions product 
portfolio has significantly enhanced our penetration of international markets and drawn us much closer to many key 
customers.
Cost of sales in our international business increased by 15% (to $170,696 in 2022 from $148,403 in 2021) on 
sales that increased 13%, gross profit rose 10% from the prior year (to $73,586 in 2022 from $67,036 in 2021), and 
gross margin percentage ended at 30% in 2022, as compared to 31% in 2021.      
Operating expenses (which include outbound freight costs) increased by $17,429 in 2022, to $200,701 or 33% 
of net sales, as compared to $183,272 or 33% in 2021. The differences in operating expenses by department are as 
follows:
 
2022
2021
Change
% Change
Selling
$ 52,512 $ 49,409 $
3,103
6%
General and administrative:
Other
51,671
47,971
3,700
8%
Proxy contest activities
1,785
—
1,785
100%
Amortization
13,953
13,713
240
2%
Research, product development and regulatory
31,816
28,855
2,961
10%
Freight, delivery and warehousing
48,964
43,324
5,640
13%
Total Operating Expenses
$200,701 $183,272 $ 17,429
10%
•
Selling expenses increased by 6% to $52,512 for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $49,409 
in 2021. This included increased costs associated with travel expenses (as the in-person business interactions 
with customers continue to increase), inflation related increased wages, increased spending on advertising and 
promoting the Company’s products, and the cost of commissions associated with sales growth in Brazil. These 
increased costs were somewhat offset by beneficial exchange rate movement in key currencies. 
•
General and administrative expenses increased by 8% to $51,671 for the year ended December 31, 2022, as 
compared to $47,971 in 2021. The main drivers were the net increase in short-term and long-term incentive 
compensation, as a result of improved financial performance and increased bad debt expenses related to our 
businesses in Central America. In addition, wages, travel expense and other administrative costs increased in 
support of our growing business.
•
The Company spent $1,785 in fees associated with our Proxy defense activities; there were no such fees in the 
comparative period of the prior year.
•
Research, product development and regulatory expenses increased by 10% to $31,816 in 2022, as compared to 
$28,855 in 2021. The main drivers were increases in our product development costs, primarily resulting from 
increased international regulatory activities and work in support of our SIMPAS/ULTIMUS technology 
platform. In addition, wages and travel expenses increased in support of our growing business. 

24
•
Freight, delivery and warehousing costs for the year ended December 31, 2022, increased by 13% (on sales up 
9%) to $48,964, as compared to $43,324 in 2021. This is mainly due to increases in freight rates, and changes 
in volume, product mix and customer destinations. When expressed as a percentage of sales, freight costs 
remained essentially flat at 8% of net sales.
In July 2020, the Company made a strategic investment in Clean Seed Inc. (Clean Seed) in the amount of 
$1,190. The investment is carried at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company 
recorded losses to Clean Seed’s fair value in the amount of $732 and $391 in 2022 and 2021, respectively.  
In February 2016, AMVAC BV made an equity investment of $3,283 in Biological Products for Agriculture 
(“Bi-PA”). The Company has elected to measure the investment at cost less impairment, if any, and to record an 
increase or decrease for changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a 
similar investment of Bi-PA. The Company recorded an impairment in the amount of $399 during the year ended 
December 31, 2021. No impairment was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Net interest expense was $3,954 in 2022, as compared to $3,687 in 2021. Interest costs are summarized in the 
following table:
 
2022
2021
Average Indebtedness and Interest expense
Average 
Debt
Interest
Expense
Interest 
Rate
Average 
Debt
Interest
Expense
Interest 
Rate
Working capital revolver
$134,158 $ 3,921
2.9% $142,238 $ 3,414
2.4%
Interest income
—
(167)
—
—
(65)
—
Amortization of deferred loan fees
—
261
—
—
367
—
Amortization of other deferred 
liabilities
—
28
—
—
(4)
—
Other interest expense
—
228
—
—
218
—
Subtotal
134,158
4,271
3.2% 142,238
3,930
2.8%
Capitalized interest
—
(317)
—
—
(243)
—
Total
$134,158 $ 3,954
2.9% $142,238 $ 3,687
2.6%
The Company’s average debt for the year ended December 31, 2022, was $134,158, as compared to $142,238 
for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease in average debt can be attributed to improved cash 
management, partially offset by the Company repurchasing $34,002 of its common stock. On a gross basis, after 
adjustments related to capitalized interest and expenses related to the amortization of deferred liabilities, our 
effective interest rate on our working capital revolver increased to 2.9%, as compared to 2.4% in 2021 due to 
increases in the LIBOR rate driven by U.S. fiscal policy.
Our provision for income taxes for 2022 was $8,561, as compared to $8,166 for 2021. The effective tax rate 
for 2022 was 23.8%, as compared to 30.1% in 2021. The decrease of the effective tax rate in 2022, as compared to 
2021, was primarily due to a non-cash charge related to a valuation allowance associated with a deferred tax asset in 
Brazil established in 2021.
The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as to income tax in multiple state jurisdictions. 
Federal income tax returns of the Company are subject to Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examination for the 
2019 through 2021 tax years. State income tax returns are subject to examination for the 2018 through 2021 tax 
years. The Company has other foreign income tax returns subject to examination.
Net income was $27,404 or $0.94 per basic share and $0.92 per diluted share in 2022, as compared to $18,587 
or $0.62 per basic share and $0.61 per diluted share in 2021.

25
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company generated $57,105 of cash from operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2022, 
as compared to $86,361 in the prior year. Included in the $57,105 are net income of $27,404, plus non-cash 
depreciation, amortization of intangibles and other long-term assets in the amount of $25,711, loss on disposal of 
property, plant and equipment of $268, amortization of deferred loan fees and discounted liabilities of $289, 
provision for bad debts in the amount of $1,171, provision for inventory obsolescence in the amount of $340, and 
revisions of contingent consideration of $610. In addition, stock-based compensation of $5,684, change in fair value 
of investments of $732, change in value of deferred income taxes of $5,278, change in liabilities for certain tax 
positions or unrecognized tax benefits of $1,441, non-cash lease expense of $68 and net foreign currency adjustment 
of $29, resulted in net cash provided by operating activities (prior to changes in assets and liabilities associated with 
operations, net of business combinations) of $55,529 as compared to $50,989 for the same period of 2021.
The Company’s working capital increased by $3,027 at December 31, 2022, as comparted to the prior year 
($121,966 compared to $118,939). Accounts receivables increased by $6,447, inventories increased by $29,560, tax 
receivable, net increased by $4,910, and prepaid expenses increased by $3,082. Deferred revenue increased by 
$47,551, driven by customer decisions to make early payments in return for early cash incentive programs. Our 
accounts payable balances increased by $1,704, program accruals decreased by $2,449 and other payables and 
accrued expenses increased by $90. The Company also paid $1,321 in contingent consideration (in addition to $68 
included in cash used in financing activities).
With regard to our program accrual, the year-over-year change is primarily driven by the mix of product line 
sales and customers in 2022, as compared to the prior year. The Company accrues programs in line with the growing 
season upon which specific products are targeted. Most of our programs relate to domestic sales. Typically, 
domestic crops have a growing season that ends on August 31st of each year. During 2022, the Company made 
accruals in the amount of $111,649 and made payments in the amount of $114,151. During 2021, the Company 
made accruals in the amount of $99,482 and made payments in the amount of $81,678.
Because the estimate for the program accrual is a material component of the Company’s overall financial 
performance, the Company believes that the process it uses is critical in setting the accrual at the appropriate level. 
The Company’s process for developing the estimate involves a detailed review of each related transaction and 
includes the input of a significant number of senior employees to enable the Company to set the accrual using 
consistently applied judgements, subject to the particular circumstances of any individual transaction.  
Cash used for investing activities amounted to $14,470 for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to 
$20,042 in 2021. In 2022, the Company spent $13,261 on capital expenditures primarily focused on continuing to 
invest in manufacturing infrastructure to expand production efficiency and capabilities. In addition, the Company 
made a payment of $1,000 to Clean Seed to amend a license agreement under which royalty-bearing license rights 
were converted to fully paid-up, royalty-free, perpetual license rights, and spent $293 on registrations and patents. In 
2021, the Company spent $10,524 in business and product acquisitions including intangible assets, goodwill, 
working capital and fixed assets as well as patent application costs, and $9,518 on capital expenditures primarily 
focused on our manufacturing facilities. 
During the year ended December 31, 2022, financing activities used $38,260, as compared to $65,871 during 
the prior year. This included making repayments of $254,000 and borrowings of $253,000 on the Company’s senior 
credit facility during the year ended December 31, 2022. During 2021, the Company made repayments in the 
amount of $186,569 and borrowings of $131,000.  During 2022, the Company paid dividends to stockholders 
amounting to $2,787, as compared to $2,382 in 2021. Furthermore, the Company paid contingent consideration in 
the amount of $68 (in addition to the $1,321 included in cash provided by operating activities) and $1,301 for the 
years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Finally, the Company used $34,002 to repurchase common 
stock in 2022, as compared to $4,579 in 2021. 
The Company has long-term debt as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 relating to a revolving line of credit as 
summarized in the following table:
 
Indebtedness
2022
2021
Revolving line of credit
$
52,300
$
53,300
Debt issuance costs
(823)
(1,060)
Total indebtedness
$
51,477
$
52,240

26
The Company’s main bank is Bank of the West, a wholly owned subsidiary of BMO Financial Group. Bank of 
the West has been the Company’s bank for more than 30 years and is the syndication manager for the Company’s 
loans. 
The Company and certain of its affiliates are parties to a revolving line of credit agreement entitled the “Third 
Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement” dated as of August 5, 2021 (the “Credit Agreement”), which 
is a senior secured lending facility among AMVAC, the Company’s principal operating subsidiary, as Borrower 
Agent (including the Company and AMVAC BV), as  Borrowers, on the one hand, and a group of commercial 
lenders led by Bank of the West as administrative agent, documentation agent, syndication agent, collateral agent 
and sole lead arranger, on the other hand. The Credit Agreement consists of a line of credit of up to $275,000, an 
accordion feature of up to $150,000, a letter of credit and swingline sub-facility (each having limits of $25,000) and 
has a maturity date of August 5, 2026. The Credit Agreement amends and restates the previous credit facility, which 
had a maturity date of June 30, 2022. With respect to key financial covenants, the Credit Agreement contains two: 
namely, borrowers are required to maintain a Total Leverage (“TL”) Ratio of no more than 3.5-to-1, during the first 
three years, stepping down to 3.25-to-1 as of September 30, 2024, and a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of at least 
1.25-to-1. In addition, to the extent that it completes acquisitions totaling $15 million or more in any 90-day period, 
AMVAC may step-up the TL Ratio by 0.5-to-1, not to exceed 4.00-to-1, for the next three full consecutive quarters. 
Acquisitions below $50 million do not require Agent consent. 
The Company’s borrowing capacity varies with its financial performance, measured in terms of Consolidated 
EBITDA as defined in the Credit Agreement, for the trailing twelve-month period. Under the Credit Agreement, 
revolving loans bear interest at a variable rate based, at borrower’s election with proper notice, on either (i) LIBOR 
plus the “Applicable Margin” which is based upon the Total Leverage (“TL”) Ratio (“LIBOR Revolver Loan”) or 
(ii) the greater of (x) the Prime Rate, (y) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, and (z) the Daily One-Month LIBOR 
Rate plus 1.00%, plus, in the case of (x), (y) or (z) the Applicable Margin (“Adjusted Base Rate Revolver Loan”). 
Interest payments for LIBOR Revolver Loans are payable on the last day of each interest period (either one-, three- 
or six- months, as selected by the borrower) and the maturity date, while interest payments for Adjusted Base Rate 
Revolver Loans are payable on the last business day of each month and the maturity date. The interest rate on 
December 31, 2022, was 5.67%.  
At December 31, 2022, according to the terms of the Credit Agreement, as amended, and based on our 
performance against the most restrictive covenant listed above, the Company had the capacity to increase its 
borrowings by up to $200,372. This compares to an available borrowing capacity of $178,705 as of December 31, 
2021. The level of borrowing capacity is driven by three factors: (1) our financial performance, as measured in 
EBITDA for trailing twelve-month period, (2) the inclusion of proforma EBITDA related to acquisitions completed 
during the preceding twelve months and (3) the leverage covenant (being the number of times EBITDA the 
Company may borrow under its credit facility agreement). 
The Company and the Lenders entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreement (“Amendment”), effective 
March 9, 2023, whereby LIBOR was replaced by SOFR with a credit spread adjustment of 10.0 bps for all SOFR 
periods. The revolving loans now bear interest at a variable rate based at borrower’s election with proper notice, on 
either (i) SOFR plus 0.1% per annum and the “Applicable Margin” or (ii) the greater of (x) the Prime Rate, (y) the 
Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, and (z) the Daily One-Month SOFR Rate plus 1.10%, plus, in the case of (x), (y) or 
(z) the Applicable Margin (“Adjusted Base Rate Revolver Loan”).  In addition, the Amendment waived the 
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (“FCCR”) requirement for the year ended December 31, 2022, and adjusted 
the terms of the FCCR for the periods ending March 31, 2023 and June 30, 2023. The Company was in compliance 
with all other debt covenants as of December 31, 2022. 
We believe that the combination of our cash flows from future operations, current cash on hand and the 
availability under the Company’s credit facility will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital 
expenditure requirements and will provide us with adequate liquidity to meet our anticipated operating needs for at 
least the next 12 months from the issuance of the Annual Report. Although operating activities are expected to 
provide cash, to the extent of growth in the future, our operating and investing activities will use cash and, 
consequently, this growth may require us to access some or all of the availability under the credit facility. It is also 
possible that additional sources of finance may be necessary to support additional growth.
Substantially all the Company’s assets are pledged as collateral under the Credit Agreement, as amended.  

27
Recently Issued Accounting Guidance
Please refer to Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual 
Report for recently issued and adopted accounting standards.  
Foreign Exchange
The Company faces market risk to the extent that changes in foreign currency exchange rates affect our non-
U.S. dollar functional currency for some of our foreign subsidiaries’ revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. We 
currently do not engage in hedging activities with respect to such exchange rate risks. 
Assets and liabilities outside the U.S. are located in regions where we have subsidiaries or joint ventures: 
Central America, South America, North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Our investments in foreign 
subsidiaries and joint ventures with a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar are generally considered long-
term. Accordingly, we do not hedge these net investments. 
Inflation
Management believes inflation has had minimal impact on the Company's operations during the past two 
years. The Company is working diligently with its critical raw material suppliers to control inflationary pressures, 
conducting contract negotiations with focus on the following: reducing or delaying price increases due to higher 
environmental costs from suppliers mainly in China and India, managing the tariff impacts by sourcing and 
leveraging alternate geographies where possible, and lastly, monitoring strengths of the U.S. dollar vs other 
currencies in order to secure benefits and balance tariff effects. The Company recognizes there is long-term pressure 
on demand for raw materials in the developing world and is utilizing its expertise to minimize inflationary pressure. 
The Company has been able to push back on many of the proposed price increases for actives and intermediates that 
are shipped to our U.S. factories, to either avoid, minimize or forestall them. In response to inflation and other 
factors that have increased the cost of goods and services, the Company has successfully implemented price 
increases on its products. 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Certain of the Company’s policies require the application of judgment by management in selecting the 
appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. These judgments are based on historical experience, 
terms of existing contracts, commonly accepted industry practices and other assumptions that the Company believes 
are reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects 
of revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period that revisions are determined to be 
necessary. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different outcomes or conditions.
The Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates include:
Revenue Recognition — Revenues from sales are recognized at the time control is transferred to the 
customer. This is typically the case when the customer has made the fixed commitment to purchase the goods, the 
products are shipped per the customer’s instructions, the sales price can be identified, and collection is probable. The 
Company has adopted procedures to ensure that revenues are recognized when earned. The procedures are subject to 
management’s review and from time-to-time certain revenues are excluded until it is clear that the title has passed 
and there is no further recourse to the Company. We also have some arrangements whereby revenues are recognized 
over time for certain products that are deemed to have no alternative use accompanied by an enforceable right to 
payment for performance completed to date. From time-to-time, the Company may offer a program to eligible 
customers, in good standing, that provides extended payment terms on a portion of the sales on selected products. 
The Company analyzes these extended payment programs in connection with its revenue recognition policy to 
ensure all revenue recognition criteria are satisfied at the time of sale. The Company also earns royalty income from 
its licensing arrangements which qualify as functional licenses rather than symbolic licenses. Upon signing a new 
licensing agreement, we typically receive up-front fees, which are generally characterized as non-refundable 
royalties. These fees are recognized as revenue upon the execution of the license agreements. Minimum royalty fees 
are recognized once the Company has an enforceable right for payment. Sales-based royalty fees are typically 

28
recognized when the sales occur. We calculate and accrue estimated royalties based on the agreement terms and 
correspondence with the licensees regarding actual sales. 
Accrued Program Costs— The Company offers various discounts to customers based on the volume 
purchased within a defined period, other pricing adjustments, some grower volume incentives or other key 
performance indicator driven payments made to distributors, retailers or growers, usually at the end of a growing 
season. The Company describes these payments as “Programs.” Programs are a critical part of doing business in 
both the U.S. crop and non-crop chemicals marketplaces. These discount Programs represent variable consideration. 
Revenues from sales are recorded at the net sales price, which is the transaction price, less an estimate of variable 
consideration. Variable consideration includes amounts expected to be paid to its customers using the expected 
value method. Each quarter management compares individual sale transactions with Programs to determine what, if 
any, estimated Program liabilities have been incurred. Once this initial calculation is made for the specific quarter, 
sales and marketing management, along with executive and financial management, review the accumulated Program 
balance and, for volume driven payments, make assessments of whether or not customers are tracking in a manner 
that indicates that they will meet the requirements set out in agreed upon terms and conditions attached to each 
Program. Following this assessment, management will adjust to the accumulated accrual to properly reflect the 
Company’s best estimate of the liability at the balance sheet date. Programs are paid out predominantly on an annual 
basis, usually in the final quarter of the financial year or the first quarter of the following year. 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts or Current Expected Credit Losses —The Company maintains an 
allowance to cover its Current Expected Credit Losses ("CECL") on its trade receivables, other receivables and 
contract assets arising from the failure of customers to make contractual payments. The Company estimates credit 
losses expected over the life of its trade receivables, other receivables and contract assets based on historical 
information combined with current conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay and reasonable and 
supportable forecasts. In most instances, the Company’s policy is to write-off trade receivables when they are 
deemed uncollectible. The vast majority of the Company's trade receivables, other receivables and contract assets 
are less than 365 days. Under the CECL impairment model, the Company develops and documents its allowance for 
credit losses on its trade receivables based on multiple portfolios. The determination of portfolios is based primarily 
on geographical location, type of customer and aging.
Inventories — The Company values its inventories at lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined 
by the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or average cost method, including, as appropriate, raw materials, labor, factory 
overhead and subcontracting services. The Company writes down its inventory to the net realizable value following 
assessments of slow moving and obsolete inventory and other annual adjustments to ensure that our standard costs 
continue to closely reflect actual manufacturing cost. 
Leases —The Company has operating leases for warehouses, manufacturing facilities, offices, cars, railcars 
and certain equipment. The Company recognizes operating lease right-of-use (ROU) assets and lease liabilities for 
all leases. The Company measures ROU assets throughout the lease term at the carrying amount of the lease 
liability, plus initial direct costs, plus (minus) any prepaid (accrued) lease payments, less the unamortized balance of 
lease incentives received. The lease liabilities are measured at the present value of the unpaid lease payments at the 
lease commencement date. Leases that include both lease and non-lease components are accounted for as a single 
lease component for each asset class, except for warehouses. The minimum payments under operating leases are 
recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term in the consolidated statements of operations. Operating lease 
expenses related to variable lease payments are recognized in cost of sales or as operating expenses in a manner 
consistent with the nature of the underlying lease and as the events, activities, or circumstances in the lease 
agreement occur. Leases with a term of less than 12 months are not recognized on the consolidated balance sheets, 
and the related lease expenses are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis 
over the lease term. The accounting for leases requires management to exercise judgment and make estimates in 
determining the applicable discount rate, effective lease term and payments due under a lease. Most of our leases do 
not provide an implicit interest rate, nor is it available to us from our lessors. As an alternative, we use our estimated 
incremental borrowing rate, which is derived from information available at the lease commencement date, including 
publicly available data, in determining the present value of lease payments. We also estimated the fair value of the 
lease and non-lease components for some of our warehouse leases based on market data and cost data. The lease 
term includes the non-cancellable period of the lease plus any additional periods covered by either an option to 
extend (or not terminate) that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise. The Company has leases with a lease 
term ranging from 1 year to 20 years. The operating leases of the Company do not contain major restrictions or 
covenants such as those relating to dividends or additional financial obligations. Finance leases are immaterial to the 
consolidated financial statements.

29
Intangible Assets—The primary identifiable intangible assets of the Company relate to assets associated with 
its product and business acquisitions. All of the Company’s intangible assets have finite lives and are amortized. The 
estimated useful life of an identifiable intangible asset is based upon a number of factors including the effects of 
demand, competition, and expected changes in the marketability of the Company’s products. 
Business Combinations—The Company uses its best estimates and assumptions to assign fair value to the 
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The Company’s estimates are 
inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. During the measurement period, which may be up to one year from 
the acquisition date, the Company may record adjustments to the fair value of these tangible and intangible assets 
acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill or an adjustment to the gain from a 
bargain purchase. In addition, uncertain tax positions and tax-related valuation allowances are initially recorded in 
connection with a business combination as of the acquisition date. The Company continues to collect information 
and reevaluates these estimates and assumptions quarterly and records any adjustments to the Company’s 
preliminary estimates to goodwill provided that the Company is within the measurement period. Upon the 
conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the fair value of assets acquired or liabilities 
assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to the Company’s consolidated statement 
of operations.
From time to time, certain of our acquisition agreements include contingent earn-out arrangements, which are 
generally based on the achievement of future income thresholds. The fair values of these earn-out arrangements are 
included as part of the purchase price of the acquired companies on their respective acquisition dates. For each 
transaction, we estimate the fair value of contingent earn-out payments as part of the initial purchase price and 
record the estimated fair value of contingent consideration as a liability on the consolidated balance sheets. 
We review and re-assess the estimated fair value of contingent consideration on a quarterly basis until the 
contingent period ends, and the updated fair value could be materially different from the initial estimates or prior 
quarterly amounts. Changes in the estimated fair value of our contingent earn-out liabilities are reported in operating 
results. 
Asset Acquisitions—If an acquisition of an asset or group of assets does not meet the definition of a business, 
the transaction is accounted for as an asset acquisition rather than a business combination. An asset acquisition does 
not result in the recognition of goodwill and transaction costs are capitalized as part of the cost of the asset or group 
of assets acquired. The Company uses its best estimates and assumptions to assign fair value to the tangible and 
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The acquisitions costs are allocated to the 
assets acquired on a relative fair value basis. From time to time, certain of our acquisition agreements include 
contingent earn-out arrangements, which are recognized only when the contingency is resolved, and the 
consideration is paid or becomes payable.
Impairment—The carrying values of long-lived assets other than goodwill are reviewed for impairment 
annually and/or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not 
be recoverable. In such circumstances, the Company evaluates recoverability of an asset group by comparing the 
carrying value to the future undiscounted cash flows that it expects to generate from the asset group. If the 
comparison indicates that the carrying value of an asset group is not recoverable, measurement of the impairment 
loss is based on the fair value of the asset. 
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment utilizing either a qualitative or quantitative assessment. If the 
Company decides that it is appropriate to perform a qualitative assessment and concludes that the fair value of a 
reporting unit more likely than not exceeds its carrying value, no further evaluation is necessary. If the Company 
performs a quantitative assessment, the Company compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying values 
and recognizes an impairment charge for the amount that the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. 
The Company annually tests goodwill for impairment at the beginning of the fourth quarter, or earlier if triggering 
events occur. 

30
Fair Value of Financial Instruments—The accounting standard for fair value measurements provides a 
framework for measuring fair value and requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Fair 
value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a 
liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the 
measurement date. This accounting standard established a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize 
the use of observable inputs, where available. The following summarizes the three levels of inputs required:
•
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. 
•
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, 
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are 
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets 
or liabilities. 
•
Level 3 – Inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimate of 
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The carrying amount of the Company’s financial instruments, which principally include cash and cash 
equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, long-term investments, accounts payable and accrued 
expenses approximate fair value because of the relatively short maturity of such instruments. The carrying amount 
of the Company’s short-term and long-term borrowings, which are considered Level 2 liabilities, approximates fair 
value based upon current rates and terms available to the Company for similar debt.
We measure our contingent earn-out liabilities in connection with acquisitions at fair value on a recurring 
basis using significant unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. We may use various 
valuation techniques depending on the terms and conditions of the contingent consideration including a Monte-Carlo 
simulation. This simulation uses probability distribution for each significant input to produce hundreds or thousands 
of possible outcomes and the results are analyzed to determine probabilities of different outcomes occurring. 
Income taxes—Income tax expense, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and liabilities for unrecognized tax 
benefits reflect management’s best estimate of current and future taxes to be paid. The Company is subject to 
income taxes in the U.S. and several foreign jurisdictions. The Company assessed the ability to realize deferred tax 
assets and determined that based on the available evidence, including a history of taxable income and estimates of 
future taxable income, it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets relating to the Company’s operations 
in Brazil, Spain, and Ukraine will not be realized and a full valuation allowance was recorded in those jurisdictions. 
Significant management judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes and deferred tax assets 
and liabilities. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates, we will adjust these estimates in future 
periods, which may result in a change in the effective tax rate in a future period. Accounting for income taxes 
involves uncertainty and judgment on how to interpret and apply tax laws and regulations within the Company’s 
annual tax filings. Such uncertainties from time to time may result in a tax position that may be challenged and 
overturned by a tax authority in the future, which could result in additional tax liability, interest charges and possibly 
penalties. The Company classifies interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense. 
ITEM 7A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates, primarily from its borrowing 
activities. The Company’s indebtedness to its primary group of lenders is evidenced by a line of credit with a 
variable rate of interest, which fluctuates with changes in the lender’s reference rate (SOFR). An increase or 
decrease in interest rates by 25 bps would impact the Company’s net income by approximately $350 based on the 
Company’s historical average borrowing in 2022 and 2021. The Company may use derivative financial instruments 
for trading purposes to protect trading performance from exchange rate fluctuations on material contracts, though 
there are no such instruments in place during any periods presented in this Annual Report. 
The Company conducts business in various foreign currencies, primarily when doing business in Europe, 
Mexico, Central and South America. Therefore, changes in the value of the currencies of such countries or regions 
affect the Company’s financial position and cash flows when translated into U.S. Dollars. The Company has 
mitigated, and will continue to mitigate, a portion of its currency exchange exposure through natural hedges based 
on the operation of decentralized foreign operating companies in which the majority of all costs are local-currency-
based. A 10% change in the value of all foreign currencies would have an immaterial effect on the Company’s 
financial position and cash flows. 

31
As part of an on-going process of assessing business risk, management has identified risk factors which are 
disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Financial Statements and Supplementary Data required by this item are listed at Part IV, Item 15, 
Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedule.
ITEM 9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND 
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management, under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, 
periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and 
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon this evaluation, as of 
December 31, 2022, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these 
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in reports 
filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely 
basis, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive 
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over 
financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the 
Company. The Company’s internal control system over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable 
assurance to management and the Board of Directors as to the fair, reliable and timely preparation and presentation 
of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United 
States of America filed with the SEC.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect 
misstatements. Therefore, even processes determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with 
respect to the financial statement preparation and presentation.
Management conducted an evaluation of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting based on a 
framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal 
Control—Integrated Framework (2013). This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, 
evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on the 
evaluation. Based on this evaluation, management believes that as of December 31, 2022, the Company’s internal 
control over financial reporting is effective.
BDO USA, LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial 
statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, was engaged to attest to and report on the effectiveness of 
AVD’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. Their report is included herein.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of the year ended 
December 31, 2022, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s 
internal control over financial reporting.

32
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
Stockholders and Board of Directors 
American Vanguard Corporation
Newport Beach, California
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited American Vanguard Corporation’s (the “Company’s”) internal control over financial reporting as 
of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the 
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). In our opinion, the 
Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, 
based on the COSO criteria. 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 
(United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the 
related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of 
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the 
accompanying index and our report dated March 16, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and 
for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, 
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the 
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with 
the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities 
laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. 
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal 
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of 
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the 
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such 
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis 
for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance 
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in 
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes 
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly 
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions 
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting 
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of 
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection 
of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial 
statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. 
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become 
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may 
deteriorate. 
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Costa Mesa, California
March 16, 2023

 
33
AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION
ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9C DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
34
PART III
ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information set forth under the captions “Executive Officers of the Company,” “Election of Directors,” 
“Information about the Board of Directors and Committees of the Board” and “Transactions with Management and 
Others—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our definitive proxy statement (the “Proxy 
Statement”) for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 7, 2023, which will be filed with the SEC 
within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Except as specifically provided, the information set forth under the captions “Compensation of Executive 
Officers” and “Information about the Board of Directors and Committees of the Board—Compensation of 
Directors” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND 
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The disclosure contained in Part II, Item 5 under “Equity Compensation Plan Information” is incorporated 
herein by reference. Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is 
incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial 
Owners and Management” in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR 
INDEPENDENCE
The information set forth under the captions “Transactions with Management and Others” and “Information 
about the Board of Directors and Committees of the Board” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by 
reference.
ITEM 14 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information regarding principal accountant fees and services is incorporated herein by reference to the 
information set forth under the caption “Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting 
Firm—Relationship of the Company with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement.

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
35
EXHIBIT INDEX
ITEM 15
Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibit
 3.1
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of American Vanguard Corporation (filed as Exhibit 
3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, which was filed on March 30, 
2004, with the Securities Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).
 3.2
Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of American Vanguard 
Corporation (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2004, 
which was filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on February 23, 2005, and incorporated 
herein by reference).
 3.3
Amended and Restated Bylaws of American Vanguard Corporation dated as of June 5, 2014 (filed as 
Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, which was filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on 
June 7, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference.)
 4
Form of Indenture (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 
333-122981) and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1
American Vanguard Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (filed as Appendix A to the Company’s 
Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2018, and 
incorporated herein by reference).
10.2
American Vanguard Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan as of June 8, 2016 (filed 
as Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
on April 25, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the American Vanguard Corporation Fourth Amended 
and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, (filed as Exhibit 10.3 with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission on March 16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the American Vanguard Corporation Fourth 
Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, (filed as Exhibit 10.4 with the Company’s Annual Report 
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, which was filed with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission on March 16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5
Employment Agreement between American Vanguard Corporation and Eric G. Wintemute dated 
January 15, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 
ended December 31, 2007, which was filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on March 17, 
2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8
Form of Change of Control Severance Agreement, dated effective as of January 1, 2004, between 
American Vanguard Corporation and its executive and senior officers (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the 
Company’s Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, which was filed with the Securities 
Exchange Commission on May 17, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference.)
10.9
Form of Amendment of Change of Control Severance Agreement, dated effective as of July 11, 2008, 
between American Vanguard Corporation and named executive officers and senior officers (filed as 
Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, which was filed on July 11, 2008, with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).
10.10
Form of Indemnification Agreement between American Vanguard Corporation and its Directors (as filed 
as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 
2004, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2005, and 
incorporated herein by reference).

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
36
Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibit
10.11
Description of Compensatory Arrangements Applicable to Non-Employee Directors (as set forth on page 
34 of the Company’s Proxy Statement which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on 
April 22, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between American Vanguard Corporation and named executive 
officers dated as of November 13, 2020. Filed as exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the 
period ended December 31, 2020.
10.14
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement between American Vanguard 
Corporation and named executive officer dated as of November 13, 2020. Filed as exhibit 10.14 to the 
Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2020.
10.15
Form of American Vanguard Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan TSR-Based 
Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement dated June 6, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s 
10-K, which was filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on February 28, 2014, and 
incorporated herein by reference).
10.16
Form of American Vanguard Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan Performance-
Based Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement dated June 6, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the 
Company’s 10-K, which was filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on February 28, 2014, and 
incorporated herein by reference).
10.17
Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 30, 2017 among 
AMVAC and certain affiliates on the other hand, and a group of commercial lenders led by Bank of the 
West as agent, swing line lender, and letter of credit issuer, on the other hand (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the 
Company’s Form 8-K, which was filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on July 6, 2017 and is 
incorporated herein by reference).
10.18
Fourth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 27, 2019, 
among AMVAC and certain affiliates, on the one hand, and a group of commercial lenders led by Bank 
of the West as agent, swing line lender, and letter of credit issuer, on the other hand (filed with the 
Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2019). Third Amended and Restated Loan 
and Security Agreement dated August 5, 2021 by and among American Vanguard Corporation et al. and 
Bank of the West et al. a form of which was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-
K on or about August 10, 2021.
21
List of Subsidiaries of the Company.*
23
Consent of BDO USA, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.*
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.1
Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.*
101
The following materials from American Vanguard Corp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 
ended December 31, 2022, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) 
Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statements 
of Stockholders’ Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (v) Consolidated 
Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of 
text.*
101.INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File 
because XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
37
Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibit
101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)
 
* Filed herewith.
(c)
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts:

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
38
Schedule II-A—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable (in thousands)
 
Balance at
Additions
Charged to
Foreign
Balance at
Fiscal Year Ended
Beginning of
Period
Costs and
Expenses
exchange
impact
End of
Period
December 31, 2022
$
3,938
1,171
27
$
5,136
December 31, 2021
$
3,297
649
(8) $
3,938
December 31, 2020
$
2,300
1,002
(5) $
3,297
 
Inventory Reserve (in thousands)
Balance at
Balance at
Fiscal Year Ended
Beginning of
Period
Additions
Deductions
End of
Period
December 31, 2022
$
2,675
1,230
(890) $
3,015
December 31, 2021
$
2,868
948
(1,141) $
2,675
December 31, 2020
$
2,130
1,120
(382) $
2,868
Deferred Tax Assets Valuation Allowance (in thousands)
Balance at
Additions
Charged to
Balance at
Fiscal Year Ended
Beginning 
of
Period
Costs and
Expenses
Other 
Comprehensive 
(Gain) Loss
Deductions
End of
Period
December 31, 2022
$
4,262 $
628 $
(788) $
(249) $
3,853
December 31, 2021
$
— $
3,304 $
958 $
— $
4,262
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm on page 42 of this annual report. 
ITEM 16 FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, American 
Vanguard Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly 
authorized.
AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION
(Registrant)
 
By:
/s/ ERIC G. WINTEMUTE
 
By:
/s/ DAVID T. JOHNSON
 
Eric G. Wintemute
Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board
 
 
David T. Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer
 March 16, 2023
 
 March 16, 2023
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the 
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.
 
By:
/s/ ERIC G. WINTEMUTE
By:
/s/ DAVID T. JOHNSON
Eric G. Wintemute
Principal Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board
David T. Johnson
Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer
March 16, 2023
March 16, 2023
By:
/s/ DEBRA EDWARDS
By:
/s/ MORTON D. ERLICH
Debra Edwards
Director
Morton D. Erlich
Director
March 16, 2023
March 16, 2023
By:
/s/ MARISOL ANGELINI
By:
/s/ SCOTT D. BASKIN
Marisol Angelini
Director
Scott D. Baskin
Director
March 16, 2023
March 16, 2023
By:
/s/ ÉMER GUNTER
By:
/s/ PATRICK E. GOTTSCHALK
Émer Gunter 
Director
Patrick E. Gottschalk
Director
March 16, 2023
March 16, 2023
By:
/s/ MARK R. BASSETT
By:
/s/ KEITH M. ROSENBLOOM
Mark R. Bassett
Director
Keith M. Rosenbloom
Director
March 16, 2023
March 16, 2023

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
40
PART IV
ITEM 15 EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
(a)
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data:
Description
Page 
No
Financial Statement Schedule:
Schedule II—A Valuation and Qualifying Accounts ..............................................................................
38
Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm BDO USA, LLP; Costa Mesa, California, 
PCAOB ID#243.......................................................................................................................................
41
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 .........................................................
43
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 .......
44
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 
and 2020 ..................................................................................................................................................
45
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 
2020 .........................................................................................................................................................
46
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 .....
47
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ...........................................................................................
48
(b)
Exhibits Index

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
41
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Stockholders and Board of Directors
American Vanguard Corporation
Newport Beach, California
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Vanguard Corporation (the 
“Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive 
income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and 
the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index (collectively referred to as the 
“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all 
material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its 
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with 
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 
(United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based 
on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring 
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and our report dated March 16, 2023 expressed an 
unqualified opinion thereon.
 
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our 
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We 
are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the 
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the 
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we 
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are 
free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated 
financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such 
procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated 
financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates 
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We 
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the 
consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee 
and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) 
involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit 
matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are 
not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on 
the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
 
Accrued Program Costs
As discussed in note 1 to the 2022 consolidated financial statements, the Company offers discounts to its 
customers based on various programs. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had accrued program costs of $60.7 

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
42
million and program costs recorded as a reduction of gross sales totaled $111.6 million in 2022. These discounts 
represent variable consideration. Revenues from sales are recorded at the net sales price, which is the transaction 
price, and includes estimates of variable consideration. Variable consideration includes amounts expected to be paid 
to customers using the expected value method. Each quarter management compares individual sale transactions with 
programs to determine what, if any, estimated program liabilities have been incurred.
We identified variable consideration related to program costs as a critical audit matter. The principal 
considerations were the recording of accrued program costs at the individual sale transaction level and the assessment 
that customers will meet the requirements set out in agreed upon terms and conditions attached to each program. 
Auditing these elements involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit effort 
required to address this matter.
 
The primary procedures we performed to address the critical audit matter included:
 
•
Testing the design and operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to management’s 
accounting for accrued program costs, specifically including controls over: (i) the calculation of 
significant components of the accrued program costs, and (ii) the completeness and accuracy of accrued 
program costs.
 
•
Assessing the completeness and reasonableness of the recorded accrued program costs at the individual 
sale transaction level through (i) comparing current year accrued program costs for certain product lines 
against historical program cost payments, and (ii) evaluating management’s ability to accurately accrue 
program costs by comparing the accruals made in prior periods to actual payment activity.
 
•
Testing the computation of the accrued program costs by (i) independently calculating portions of the 
accrued program costs at the individual sale transaction level, and (ii) validating management’s 
assessment that customers will meet the program requirements by comparing a sample of accrued program 
costs payments made to customers to the approved program rates and relevant source documents. 
 
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
 
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1991.
 
Costa Mesa, California
March 16, 2023

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
43
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2022 and 2021
(In thousands, except share data)
 
2022
2021
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
20,328
$
16,285
Receivables:
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,136 and $3,938,
   respectively
156,492
149,326
Other
9,816
9,595
Total receivables, net
166,308
158,921
Inventories, net
184,190
154,306
Prepaid expenses
15,850
12,488
Income taxes receivable
1,891
—
Total current assets
388,567
342,000
Property, plant and equipment, net
70,912
66,111
Operating lease right-of-use assets
24,250
25,386
Intangible assets, net of amortization
184,664
197,841
Goodwill
47,010
46,260
Other assets
10,769
16,292
Deferred income tax assets, net
141
270
Total assets
$
726,313
$
694,160
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Current installments of other liabilities
$
—
$
802
Accounts payable
69,000
67,140
Customer prepayments
110,597
63,064
Accrued program costs
60,743
63,245
Accrued expenses and other payables
20,982
20,745
Income taxes payable
—
3,006
Operating lease liabilities, current
5,279
5,059
Total current liabilities
266,601
223,061
Long-term debt, net of deferred loan fees
51,477
52,240
Other liabilities, excluding current installments
4,167
5,335
Operating lease liabilities, long-term
19,492
20,780
Deferred income tax liabilities, net
14,597
20,006
Total liabilities
356,334
321,422
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Notes 5 and 11)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.10 par value per share; authorized 400,000 shares; 
none issued
—
—
Common stock, $0.10 par value per share; authorized 40,000,000 shares; 
issued 34,446,194 shares in 2022 and 34,248,218 shares in 2021
3,444
3,426
Additional paid-in capital
105,634
101,450
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(12,182)
(13,784)
Retained earnings
328,745
304,385
425,641
395,477
Less treasury stock at cost, 5,029,892 shares in 2022 and 3,361,040 in 
2021
(55,662)
(22,739)
Total stockholders’ equity
369,979
372,738
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
726,313
$
694,160
 
See summary of significant accounting policies and notes to consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
44
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
(In thousands, except per share data)
2022
2021
2020
Net sales
$
609,615
$
557,676
$
458,704
Cost of sales
(368,263)
(343,629)
(286,114)
Gross profit
241,352
214,047
172,590
Operating expenses
(200,701)
(183,272)
(154,339)
Bargain purchase gain on business acquisition
—
171
4,657
Operating income
40,651
30,946
22,908
Change in fair value of equity investments, net
(732)
(790)
717
Other income
—
672
—
Interest expense, net
(3,954)
(3,687)
(5,178)
Income before provision for income taxes and loss on equity 
method investment
35,965
27,141
18,447
Provision for income taxes
(8,561)
(8,166)
(3,080)
Income before loss on equity method investment
27,404
18,975
15,367
Loss from equity method investment
—
(388)
(125)
Net income
$
27,404
$
18,587
$
15,242
Earnings per common share—basic
$
0.94
$
0.62
$
0.52
Earnings per common share—assuming dilution
$
0.92
$
0.61
$
0.51
Weighted average shares outstanding—basic
29,234
29,811
29,450
Weighted average shares outstanding—assuming dilution
29,872
30,410
29,993
See summary of significant accounting policies and notes to consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
45
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
(In thousands)
2022
2021
2020
Net income
$
27,404
$
18,587
$
15,242
Other comprehensive gain (loss)
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax effects
1,602
(4,462)
(3,624)
Comprehensive income
$
29,006
$
14,125
$
11,618
See summary of significant accounting policies and notes to consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
46
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
(In thousands, except share data)
Accumulated
Additional
Other
Common Stock
Paid-in
Comprehensive
Retained
Treasury Stock
AVD
Shares
Amount
Capital
loss
Earnings
Shares
Amount
Total
Balance, December 31, 
2019
33,233,614
$
3,324
$
90,572
$
(5,698)
$ 274,118
3,061,040
$
(18,160)
$
344,156
Stocks issued under ESPP
49,668
5
716
—
—
—
—
721
Cash dividends on 
common stock ($0.04
   per share)
—
—
—
—
(1,178)
—
—
(1,178)
Foreign currency 
translation adjustment, 
net
—
—
(3,624)
(3,624)
Stock based 
compensation
—
—
6,561
—
—
—
—
6,561
Stock options exercised, 
grants, termination, 
   and vesting of restricted 
stock units (net of
   shares in lieu of taxes)
639,151
65
(1,207)
—
—
—
—
(1,142)
Net income
—
—
—
—
15,242
—
—
15,242
Balance, December 31, 
2020
33,922,433
3,394
96,642
(9,322)
288,182
3,061,040
(18,160)
360,736
Stocks issued under ESPP
50,782
4
739
—
—
—
—
743
Cash dividends on 
common stock ($0.08
   per share)
—
—
—
—
(2,384)
—
—
(2,384)
Foreign currency 
translation adjustment, 
net
—
—
—
(4,462)
(4,462)
Stock based 
compensation
—
—
6,880
—
—
—
—
6,880
Stock options exercised, 
grants, termination, 
   and vesting of restricted 
stock units (net of
   shares in lieu of taxes)
275,003
28
(2,811)
—
—
—
—
(2,783)
Shares repurchased
—
—
—
—
—
300,000
(4,579)
(4,579)
Net income
—
—
—
—
18,587
—
—
18,587
Balance, December 31, 
2021
34,248,218
3,426
101,450
(13,784)
304,385
3,361,040
(22,739)
372,738
Stocks issued under ESPP
51,240
4
833
—
—
—
—
837
Cash dividends on 
common stock ($0.10
   per share)
—
—
—
—
(3,044)
—
—
(3,044)
Foreign currency 
translation adjustment, 
net
—
—
—
1,602
—
—
—
1,602
Stock based 
compensation
—
—
5,684
—
—
—
—
5,684
Stock options exercised, 
grants, termination, 
   and vesting of restricted 
stock units (net of
   shares in lieu of taxes)
146,736
14
(1,254)
—
—
—
—
(1,240)
Shares repurchased
—
—
(1,079)
—
—
1,668,852
(32,923)
(34,002)
Net income
—
—
—
—
27,404
—
—
27,404
Balance, December 31, 
2022
34,446,194
$
3,444
$
105,634
$
(12,182)
$ 328,745
5,029,892
$
(55,662)
$
369,979
See summary of significant accounting policies and notes to consolidated financial statements.

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
 
47
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
(In thousands) 
2022
2021
2020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
$
27,404
$
18,587
$
15,242
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating 
activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment and intangible 
assets
22,138
22,229
19,902
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
268
194
119
Amortization of other long-term assets
3,573
3,943
3,947
Amortization and accretion of deferred loan fees and discounted liabilities
289
359
309
Provision for bad debts
1,171
649
1,002
Provision for inventory obsolescence
340
1,034
738
Loan principal and interest forgiveness
—
(672)
—
Fair value adjustment of contingent consideration
610
758
250
Decrease in environmental liability
—
(167)
(1,155)
Stock-based compensation
5,684
6,880
6,561
Deferred income taxes
(5,278)
(2,090)
969
Changes in liabilities for uncertain tax positions or unrecognized tax benefits
(1,441)
(1,783)
(2,092)
Change in equity investment fair value
732
790
(717)
Loss from equity method investment
—
388
125
Bargain purchase gain
—
(171)
(4,657)
Non-cash lease expense
68
286
18
Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses
(29)
(225)
126
Changes in assets and liabilities associated with operations, net of business 
combinations:
(Increase) decrease in net receivables
(6,447)
(24,347)
15,407
(Increase) decrease in inventories
(29,560)
8,323
6,683
(Increase) decrease in income tax receivable, net
(4,910)
6,051
(287)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets
(3,082)
(4,581)
140
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
1,704
8,783
(8,199)
Increase in deferred revenue
47,551
19,280
36,803
(Decrease) increase in accrued program costs
(2,449)
17,877
(2,517)
Increase in other payables and accrued expenses
90
3,986
1,607
Payment of contingent consideration
(1,321)
—
—
Net cash provided by operating activities
57,105
86,361
90,324
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures
(13,261)
(9,518)
(11,249)
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment
84
—
—
Acquisitions of businesses and product lines
—
(10,000)
(19,342)
Intangible assets
(1,293)
(524)
(4,014)
Investment
—
—
(1,190)
Net cash used in investing activities
(14,470)
(20,042)
(35,795)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments under line of credit agreement
(254,000)
(186,569)
(168,400)
Borrowings under line of credit agreement
253,000
131,000
126,776
Payment of contingent consideration
(68)
(1,301)
(1,227)
Net receipt from the issuance of common stock under ESPP
837
743
721
Net receipt from the exercise of stock options
827
172
1,603
Net payment from common stock purchased for tax withholding
(2,067)
(2,955)
(2,745)
Repurchase of common stock
(34,002)
(4,579)
—
Payment of cash dividends
(2,787)
(2,382)
(1,168)
Net cash used in financing activities
(38,260)
(65,871)
(44,440)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
4,375
448
10,089
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(332)
(86)
(747)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
16,285
15,923
6,581
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
20,328
$
16,285
$
15,923
See summary of significant accounting policies and notes to the consolidated financial statements.

48
AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION 
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(1) Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
American Vanguard Corporation (the “Company” or “AVD”) is primarily a specialty chemical manufacturer 
that develops and markets safe and effective products for agricultural, commercial and consumer uses. The 
Company manufactures and formulates chemicals for crops, human and animal protection. The consolidated 
financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts 
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company operates within a single operating segment. 
All U.S. Dollar amounts reflected in the notes to the consolidated financial statements are presented in 
thousands, except per share data.
The Company believes that the combination of its cash flows from future operations, current cash on hand and 
the availability under the Company’s credit facility will be sufficient to meet its working capital and capital 
expenditure requirements and will provide the Company with adequate liquidity to meet its anticipated operating 
needs for at least the next 12 months from the issuance of these consolidated financial statements. Although 
operating activities are expected to provide cash, to the extent of growth in the future, its operating and investing 
activities will use cash and, consequently, this growth may require the Company to access some or all of the 
availability under the credit facility. It is also possible that additional sources of finance may be necessary to support 
additional growth.
Based on similar economic and operational characteristics, the Company’s business is aggregated into one 
reportable category. Selective enterprise information is as follows:
 
2022
2021
2020
Net sales:
U.S. crop
$ 288,624
$ 263,632
$ 211,357
U.S. non-crop
76,709
78,605
60,367
Total U.S.
365,333
342,237
271,724
International
244,282
215,439
186,980
Total net sales
$ 609,615
$ 557,676
$ 458,704
Gross profit:
U.S. crop
$ 132,509
$ 109,568
$
92,723
U.S. non-crop
35,257
37,443
27,842
Total U.S.
167,766
147,011
120,565
International
73,586
67,036
52,025
Total gross profit
$ 241,352
$ 214,047
$ 172,590
Due to elements inherent to the Company’s business, such as differing and unpredictable weather patterns, 
crop growing cycles, changes in product mix of sales and ordering patterns that may vary in timing, measuring the 
Company’s performance on a quarterly basis (for example, gross profit margins on a quarterly basis may vary 
significantly) even when such comparisons are favorable, is not as good an indicator as full-year comparisons.
Out-of-period adjustment to 2021 consolidated statements of operations—In Australia, the Company sells its 
products to distribution companies as well as directly to growers via third-party agents. The Company identified 
errors related to the classification of third-party agent’s commission amounts. The Company evaluated these errors 
and the impact to previously issued financial statements and concluded that the adjustments and impact of this 
classification error is not material to any previously issued quarterly or annual financial statements. However, to improve 
the consistency and comparability of the financial statements, management has recorded an out-of-period adjustment to 
previously reported financial statement line items and related disclosures in this report. The third-party agents’ 
commission in the amount of $804 was reclassified from net sales to operating expenses. The impact was an 
increase in net sales and gross profit in the amount of $804 and an offsetting increase in operating expenses in the 
same amount. This adjustment to the 2021 consolidated statements of operations did not have any impact on 
operating income, net income, and earnings per common share.

49
Reclassifications—Certain prior years’ amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s 
presentation.    
Cost of Sales— Cost of sales is the Company’s capitalized cost of inventory procurement and production that 
is sold in the respective periods. These costs include direct labor, materials, and manufacturing overhead, 
Additionally the Company also includes such cost centers as Health and Safety, Environmental, Maintenance and 
Quality Control in cost of sales.
Operating Expenses—Operating expenses include cost centers for Selling, General and Administrative, 
Research, Product Development, and Regulatory, and outbound Freight, Delivery and Warehousing.
 
2022
2021
2020
Selling
$
52,512
$
49,409
$
42,389
General and administrative:
Other
51,671
47,971
36,084
Proxy contest activities
1,785
—
—
Amortization
13,953
13,713
12,744
Research, product development and regulatory
31,816
28,855
26,310
Freight, delivery and warehousing
48,964
43,324
36,812
Total operating expenses
$ 200,701
$ 183,272
$ 154,339
Advertising Expense—The Company expenses advertising costs in the period incurred. Advertising expenses, 
which include promotional costs, are recognized as selling expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and 
were $5,836, $5,201 and $4,833 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents include short-term investments, which are highly 
liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased. The Company maintains cash and cash 
equivalent balances that exceed federally insured limits with a number of financial institutions. When evaluating 
cash and cash equivalents for current expected credit losses, the Company reviews factors such as historical 
experience with defaults, losses, credit ratings, term and macroeconomic trends, including current conditions and 
forecasts to the extent they are reasonable and supportable.
Inventories—The Company values its inventories at lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined 
by the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or average cost method, including material, labor, factory overhead and 
subcontracting services. The Company writes down its inventory carrying values as a result of net realizable value 
assessments of slow moving and obsolete inventory and other annual adjustments to ensure that its standard costs 
continue to closely reflect actual cost. The Company recorded an inventory reserve allowance of $3,015 and $2,675 
at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.   
The components of inventories, net of reserve allowance, consist of the following:
 
2022
2021
Finished products
$
155,128 $
138,159
Raw materials
29,062
16,147
Total inventories, net
$
184,190 $
154,306
Leases— The Company has operating leases for warehouses, manufacturing facilities, offices, cars, railcars 
and certain equipment for which operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and corresponding lease liabilities are 
recorded. The Company measures ROU assets throughout the lease term at the carrying amount of the lease liability, 
plus initial direct costs, plus (minus) any prepaid (accrued) lease payments, less the unamortized balance of lease 
incentives received. The lease liabilities are measured at the present value of the unpaid lease payments at the lease 
commencement date. Leases that include both lease and non-lease components are accounted for as a single lease 
component for each asset class, except for warehouse leases.

50
The minimum payments under operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term in 
the consolidated statements of operations. Operating lease expenses related to variable lease payments are 
recognized in cost of sales or as operating expenses in a manner consistent with the nature of the underlying lease 
and as the events, activities, or circumstances in the lease agreement occur. Leases with a term of less than 12 
months are not recognized on the consolidated balance sheets, and the related lease expenses are recognized in the 
consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The accounting for leases requires management to exercise judgment and make estimates in determining the 
applicable discount rate, lease term and payments due under a lease. Most of our leases do not provide an implicit 
interest rate, nor is it available to us from our lessors. As an alternative, the Company uses our estimated incremental 
borrowing rate, which is derived from information available at the lease commencement date, including publicly 
available data, in determining the present value of lease payments. The Company also estimated the fair value of the 
lease and non-lease components for some of our warehouse leases based on market data and cost data.
The lease term includes the non-cancellable period of the lease plus any additional periods covered by either 
an option to extend (or not terminate) that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise. The Company has leases 
with a lease term ranging from 1 year to 20 years. 
The operating leases of the Company do not contain major restrictions or covenants such as those relating to 
dividends or additional financial obligations. Finance leases are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements. 
There were no lease transactions with related parties during 2022, 2021 and 2020.
The operating lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was $6,531, $6,053 and 
$5,662, respectively. Lease expenses related to variable lease payments and short-term leases were immaterial. 
Additional information related to operating leases are as follows:
Year Ended
December 31, 
2022
Year Ended
December 31, 
2021
Year Ended
December 31, 
2020
Cash paid for amounts included in the 
measurement of lease liabilities
$
6,450 $
5,750 $
5,657
ROU assets obtained in exchange for new 
liabilities
$
4,468 $
18,521 $
6,309
The weighted-average remaining lease term and discount rate related to the operating leases as of December 
31, 2022 and 2021 were as follows:
December 31, 
2022
December 31, 
2021
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in 
years)
5.93
6.72
Weighted-average discount rate
4.00%
4.02%
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases as of December 31, 2022 were as 
follows:
2023
$
6,073
2024
5,204
2025
4,688
2026
3,464
2027
2,387
Thereafter
6,194
Total lease payments
$
28,010
Less: imputed interest
(3,239)
Total
$
24,771
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets:
Operating lease liabilities, current
$
5,279
Operating lease liabilities, long term
$
19,492

51
Revenue Recognition— The Company recognizes revenue when control of the ordered goods or services are 
transferred to its customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in 
exchange for those goods or services. The Company sells its products mainly to distributors and retailers. The 
products include insecticides, herbicides, soil fumigants, fungicides and biologicals. In addition, the Company 
recognizes royalty income related to licensing arrangements which qualify as functional licenses rather than 
symbolic licenses. Upon signing a new licensing agreement, the Company typically receives up-front fees, which 
are generally characterized as non-refundable royalties. These fees are recognized as revenue upon the execution of 
the license agreements. Minimum royalty fees are recognized once the Company has an enforceable right for 
payment. Sales-based royalty fees are typically recognized when the sales occur. The Company calculates and 
accrues estimated royalties based on the contractual terms and correspondence with the licensees regarding actual 
sales. Based on similar economic and operational characteristics, the Company’s business is aggregated into one 
reportable segment. Selective enterprise information of sales disaggregated by category and geographic region is as 
follows:
2022
2021
2020
Net sales:
U.S. crop
$288,624 $263,632 $211,357
U.S. non-crop
76,709
78,605
60,367
Total U.S.
365,333
342,237
271,724
International
244,282
215,439
186,980
Total net sales
$609,615 $557,676 $458,704
Timing of revenue recognition:
Goods and services transferred at a point in 
time
$609,409 $557,176 $455,726
Goods and services transferred over time
206
500
2,978
Total net sales
$609,615 $557,676 $458,704
Contract Assets— Contract assets relate to royalties earned on certain functional licenses granted for the use 
of the Company’s intellectual property and amounted to $3,100 and $3,900 at December 31, 2022 and 2021, 
respectively. The short-term and long-term contract assets of $2,098 and $1,002 are included in other receivables 
and other assets, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 
2021, the short-term and long-term assets amounted to $1,825 and $2,075, respectively.  
Accrued Program Costs— The Company offers various discounts to customers based on the volume 
purchased within a defined period, other pricing adjustments, some grower volume incentives or other key 
performance indicator driven payments, which are usually made at the end of a growing season, to distributors, 
retailers or growers. The Company describes these payments as “Programs.” Programs are a critical part of doing 
business in both the U.S. crop and non-crop chemicals marketplaces. These discount Programs represent variable 
consideration. Revenues from sales are recorded at the net sales price, which is the transaction price net of the 
impact of Programs and includes estimates of variable consideration. Variable consideration includes amounts 
expected to be paid to its customers, estimated using the expected value method. Each quarter management 
compares individual sale transactions with Programs to determine what, if any, estimated program liabilities have 
been incurred. Once this initial calculation is made for the specific quarter, sales and marketing management, along 
with executive and financial management, review the accumulated Program balance and, for volume driven 
payments, make assessments of whether or not customers are tracking in a manner that indicates that they will meet 
the requirements set out in agreed upon terms and conditions attached to each Program. Following this assessment, 
management will make adjustments to the accumulated accrual to properly reflect the Company’s best estimate of 
the liability at the balance sheet date. Programs are paid out predominantly on an annual basis, usually in the final 
quarter of the financial year or the first quarter of the following year.   
Customer Prepayments— From time to time, the Company receives prepayments from customers which are 
recorded as customer prepayments on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company does not recognize 
revenue on any such payments unless and until the customer places binding purchase orders, the goods are shipped, 
and control is transferred to the customer. Revenue recognized for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 
2020 that were included in the customer prepayments balance at the beginning of 2022, 2021, and 2020 was 
$63,064, $37,779, and $5,652, respectively.

52
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts or Current Expected Credit Losses— The Company maintains an 
allowance to cover its Current Expected Credit Losses ("CECL") on its trade receivables, other receivables and 
contract assets arising from the possible failure of customers to make contractual payments. The Company estimates 
credit losses expected over the life of its trade receivables, other receivables and contract assets based on historical 
information combined with current conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay and reasonable and 
supportable forecasts. In most instances, the Company’s policy is to write-off trade receivables when they are 
deemed uncollectible. The vast majority of the Company's trade receivables, other receivables and contract assets 
are less than 365 days. Under the CECL impairment model, the Company develops and documents its allowance for 
credit losses on its trade receivables based on multiple portfolios. The determination of portfolios is based primarily 
on geographical location, type of customer and aging.
Debt Issuance Costs— The Company capitalizes costs incurred with borrowing and records debt issuance 
costs as a reduction to the debt amount. These costs in connection with the Company’s revolving line of credit are 
amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the borrowing and included in interest expense.
Property, Plant and Equipment and Depreciation— Property, plant and equipment includes the cost of land, 
buildings, machinery and equipment, office furniture and fixtures, automobiles, construction projects and significant 
improvements to existing plant and equipment. Interest costs related to significant construction projects are 
capitalized at the Company’s current weighted average effective interest rate. Expenditures for minor repairs and 
maintenance are expensed as incurred. When property or equipment is sold or otherwise disposed of, the related cost 
and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and the gain or loss realized on disposition 
is reflected in operations. All plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method, utilizing the 
estimated useful property lives. 
Intangible Assets— The primary identifiable intangible assets of the Company relate to assets associated with 
its product and business acquisitions. All the Company’s intangible assets are amortizing assets with finite lives. The 
estimated useful life of an identifiable intangible asset is based upon several factors including the effects of demand, 
competition, and expected changes in the marketability of the Company’s products. 
Business Combinations— The Company uses its best estimates and assumptions to assign fair value to the 
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The Company’s estimates are 
inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. During the measurement period, which may be up to one year from 
the acquisition date, the Company may record adjustments to the fair value of these tangible and intangible assets 
acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill or an adjustment to the gain from a 
bargain purchase. In addition, when appropriate uncertain tax positions and tax-related valuation allowances are 
initially recorded in connection with a business combination as of the acquisition date. The Company continues to 
collect information and reevaluates these estimates and assumptions quarterly and records any adjustments to the 
Company’s preliminary estimates to goodwill or an adjustment to the gain from a bargain purchase, provided that 
the Company is within the measurement period. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final 
determination of the fair value of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent 
adjustments are recorded to the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.
From time to time, certain of our acquisition agreements include contingent earn-out arrangements, which are 
generally based on the achievement of future income thresholds. The fair values of these earn-out arrangements are 
included as part of the purchase price of the acquired companies on their respective acquisition dates. For each 
transaction, the Company engages third-party valuation specialists to assist it in making estimates of the fair value of 
contingent earn-out payments, both as part of the initial purchase price and at each subsequent financial statement 
date until the end of the related performance period. The Company records the estimated fair value of contingent 
consideration as a liability on the consolidated balance sheets. 
We review and re-assess the estimated fair value of contingent consideration on a quarterly basis, and the 
updated fair value could be materially different from the initial estimates or prior quarterly amounts. Changes in the 
estimated fair value of our contingent earn-out liabilities are reported in operating results. 
Asset Acquisitions— If an acquisition of an asset or group of assets does not meet the definition of a business, 
the transaction is accounted for as an asset acquisition rather than a business combination. An asset acquisition does 
not result in the recognition of goodwill and transaction costs are capitalized as part of the cost of the asset or group 
of assets acquired. The Company uses its best estimates and assumptions to assign fair value to the tangible and 
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The acquisitions costs are allocated to the 
assets acquired on a relative fair value basis. 

53
Impairment— The carrying values of long-lived assets other than goodwill are reviewed for impairment 
annually and/or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not 
be recoverable. The Company evaluates recoverability of an asset group by comparing the carrying value to the 
future undiscounted cash flows that it expects to generate from the asset group. If the comparison indicates that the 
carrying value of an asset group is not recoverable, measurement of the impairment loss is based on the fair value of 
the asset. There were no circumstances that would indicate any impairment of the carrying value of these long-lived 
assets and no material impairment losses were recorded in 2022, 2021, or 2020.
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment utilizing either a qualitative or quantitative assessment. If the 
Company decides that it is appropriate to perform a qualitative assessment and concludes that the fair value of a 
reporting unit more likely than not exceeds its carrying value, no further evaluation is necessary. If the Company 
performs a quantitative assessment, the Company compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying 
amounts and recognizes an impairment charge for the amount that the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s 
fair value. The Company annually tests goodwill for impairment in the beginning of the fourth quarter, or earlier if 
triggering events occur. The Company did not record any impairment losses in 2022, 2021, or 2020. 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments— The accounting standard for fair value measurements provides a 
framework for measuring fair value and requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Fair 
value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a 
liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the 
measurement date. This accounting standard established a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize 
the use of observable inputs, where available. The following summarizes the three levels of inputs required:
•
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. 
•
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted 
prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can 
be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. 
•
Level 3 – Inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimate of assumptions 
that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
The Company did not have any significant Level 1 investments as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, except for 
its equity investment in Clean Seed Capital Group Ltd. (see Note 16 – Equity Investments).
The carrying amount of receivables, payables and other amounts arising out of the normal course of business 
approximates fair value because of the relatively short maturity of such instruments. The carrying amount of the 
Company’s short-term and long-term borrowings, which are considered Level 2 liabilities, approximates fair value 
based on current rates and terms available to the Company for similar debt.
The Company's contingent earn-out liabilities in connection with its acquisitions are measured at fair value on 
a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs classified within Level 3. The Company may use various 
valuation techniques depending on the terms and conditions of the contingent consideration including a Monte-Carlo 
simulation. This simulation uses probability distribution for each significant input to produce hundreds or thousands 
of possible outcomes and the results are analyzed to determine probabilities of different outcomes occurring. Refer 
to Note 10 for a reconciliation of the Company’s contingent consideration.
Foreign Currency Translation— Certain international operations use the respective local currencies as their 
functional currency, while other international operations use the U.S. Dollar as their functional currency. The 
Company considers the U.S. Dollar as its reporting currency. Translation adjustments for subsidiaries where the 
functional currency is its local currency are included in other comprehensive gain (loss). Foreign currency 
transaction gains (losses) resulting from exchange rate fluctuation on transactions denominated in a currency other 
than the functional currency are reported in earnings. Assets and liabilities of the foreign operations denominated in 
local currencies are translated at the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated 
at the weighted average rate of exchange during the period. Translations of intercompany loans of a long-term 
investment nature are included as a component of translation adjustment in other comprehensive gain (loss).

54
Income Taxes—The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in ASC 
740. Under the liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on the temporary differences between the 
financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using tax rates expected to be in effect during the years in 
which the basis differences reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of 
the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the need for valuation allowances, the Company considers 
projected future taxable income and the availability of tax planning strategies. If in the future the Company 
determines that it would not be able to realize its recorded deferred tax assets, an increase in the valuation allowance 
would be recorded, decreasing earnings in the period in which such determination is made. 
The Company assesses its income tax positions and records tax benefits for all years subject to examination 
based upon the Company’s evaluation of the facts, circumstances, and information available at the reporting date. 
For those tax positions where there is greater than 50% likelihood that a tax benefit will be sustained, the Company 
has recorded the largest amount of tax benefit that may potentially be realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing 
authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. For those income tax positions where there is less than 
50% likelihood that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit has been recognized in the consolidated financial 
statements.
Per Share Information—Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed as net income divided by the 
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects potential 
dilution to EPS that could occur if securities or other contracts, which, for the Company, consists of restricted stock 
grants and options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, are exercised as calculated using the 
treasury stock method.
The components of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:
 
2022
2021
2020
Numerator:
Net income
$
27,404
$
18,587
$
15,242
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding—basic
29,234
29,811
29,450
Dilutive effect of stock options and grants
638
599
543
Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted
29,872
30,410
29,993
For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, no options or grants were excluded from the 
computation.
Use of Estimates—The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting 
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make 
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities (including those related to litigation), 
and revenues, at the date that the consolidated financial statements are prepared. Significant estimates relate to the 
allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, impairment of long-lived assets, investments and goodwill, 
assets acquired, and liabilities assumed in connections with business combinations and asset acquisitions, accrued 
program costs, stock-based compensation and income taxes. Actual results could materially differ from those 
estimates.
Total comprehensive income—In addition to net income, total comprehensive income includes changes in 
equity that are excluded from the consolidated statements of operations and are recorded directly into a separate 
section of stockholders’ equity on the consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, 
and 2020, total comprehensive income consisted of net income and foreign currency translation adjustments.
Stock-Based Compensation—The Company estimates the fair value of share-based payment awards on the 
date of grant. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over 
the requisite service periods in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

55
Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the fair value of the portion of 
share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period. Stock-based compensation 
expense recognized is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Estimated forfeitures recognized in the Company’s 
consolidated statements of operations reduced compensation expense by $370, $320, and $222 for the years ended 
December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. The Company estimates that 18% of both restricted stock grants 
and performance-based restricted shares that are currently subject to vesting will be forfeited. These estimates are 
reviewed quarterly and revised as necessary.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model (“Black-Scholes model”) to value option grants 
using the following weighted average assumptions (i.e. risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, volatility and average 
lives). There were no stock options granted during 2022, 2021 or 2020. 
The expected volatility and expected life assumptions are complex and use subjective variables. The variables 
take into consideration, among other things, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behavior. The 
Company estimates the expected term or vesting period using the “safe harbor” provisions of Staff Accounting 
Bulletin (“SAB”) 107 and SAB 110. The Company used historical volatility as a proxy for estimating expected 
volatility.
The Company values restricted stock grants using the Company’s traded stock price at closing on the date of 
grant. The weighted average grant-date fair values of restricted stock grants during 2022, 2021, and 2020 were 
$23.53, $20.00, and $14.39, respectively.
Recently Issued Accounting Guidance:
Accounting Standards Adopted
In November 2021, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU No. 2021-10, 
“Disclosures by Business Entities about Government Assistance.” This ASU codifies new requirements to disclose 
information about the nature of certain government assistance received, the accounting policy used to account for 
the transactions, the location in the financial statements where such transactions were recorded, and significant terms 
and conditions associated with such transactions. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after 
December 15, 2021. Effective January 1, 2022, the Company adopted ASU No. 2021-10 on a prospective basis. The 
adoption of this standard was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04 Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the 
Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, as amended and supplemented by subsequent ASUs 
(collectively, “ASU 2020-04” and “ASU 2022-06”), which provides practical expedients for contract modifications 
and certain hedging relationships associated with the transition from reference rates that are expected to be 
discontinued. This guidance is applicable for borrowing instruments, which use LIBOR as a reference rate, and is 
available through December 31, 2024. The Company has evaluated this ASU and does not expect its adoption to 
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

56
(2) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment at December 31, 2022 and 2021 consist of the following:
 
2022
2021
Estimated
useful lives
Land
$
2,757 $
2,756
Buildings and improvements
20,794
19,844 10 to 30 years
Machinery and equipment
142,980
132,159
3 to 15 years
Office furniture, fixtures and equipment
13,231
10,094
3 to 10 years
Automotive equipment
1,584
1,832
3 to 6 years
Construction in progress
5,897
8,199
Total gross value
187,243
174,884
Less accumulated depreciation
(116,331)
(108,773)
Total net value
$
70,912 $
66,111
Domestic
66,268
61,533
International
4,644
4,578
Total net value
$
70,912 $
66,111
 
For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, the Company’s aggregate depreciation expense 
related to property, plant and equipment was $7,974, $8,530, and $7,466, respectively. For the years ended 
December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, the Company eliminated from assets and accumulated depreciation $416, $658 
and $1,400 of fully depreciated assets, respectively. 
(3) Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt of the Company at December 31, 2022 and 2021 is summarized as follows:
 
2022
2021
Revolving line of credit
$
52,300 $
53,300
Less debt issuance costs
(823)
(1,060)
$
51,477 $
52,240
 
Principal payments on long-term debt at December 31, 2022 of $52,300 are due in August 2026.
The Company’s main bank is Bank of the West, a wholly owned subsidiary of BMO Financial Group. Bank of 
the West has been the Company’s bank for more than 30 years and is the syndication manager for the Company’s 
loans.
The Company and certain of its affiliates are parties to a revolving line of credit agreement entitled the “Third 
Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement” dated as of August 5, 2021 (the “Credit Agreement”), which 
is a senior secured lending facility among AMVAC, the Company’s principal operating subsidiary, as Borrower 
Agent (including the Company and AMVAC BV), as  Borrowers, on the one hand, and a group of commercial 
lenders led by Bank of the West as administrative agent, documentation agent, syndication agent, collateral agent, 
sole lead arranger and book runner, on the other hand. The Credit Agreement consists of a line of credit of up to 
$275,000, an accordion feature of up to $150,000, a letter of credit and swingline sub-facility (each having limits of 
$25,000) and has a maturity date of August 5, 2026. The Credit Agreement amends and restates the previous credit 
facility, which had a maturity date of June 30, 2022. With respect to key financial covenants, the Credit Agreement 
contains two: namely, borrowers are required to maintain a Total Leverage (“TL”) Ratio of no more than 3.5-to-1, 
during the first three years, stepping down to 3.25-to-1 as of September 30, 2024, and a Fixed Charge Coverage 
Ratio of at least 1.25-to-1. In addition, to the extent that it completes acquisitions totaling $15 million or more in any 
90-day period, AMVAC may step-up the TL Ratio by 0.5-to-1, not to exceed 4.00-to-1, for the next three full 
consecutive quarters. Acquisitions below $50 million no longer require Agent consent. Distributions to the 
Company’s stockholders are limited to net income for the four fiscal quarter period ending on the fiscal quarter 
immediately prior to the fiscal quarter in which the current distribution was declared.

57
The Company’s borrowing capacity varies with its financial performance, measured in terms of Consolidated 
EBITDA as defined in the Credit Agreement, for the trailing twelve-month period. Under the Credit Agreement, 
revolving loans bear interest at a variable rate based, at borrower’s election with proper notice, on either (i) LIBOR 
plus the “Applicable Margin” which is based upon the Total Leverage (“TL”) Ratio (“LIBOR Revolver Loan”) or 
(ii) the greater of (x) the Prime Rate, (y) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, and (z) the Daily One-Month LIBOR 
Rate plus 1.00%, plus, in the case of (x), (y) or (z) the Applicable Margin (“Adjusted Base Rate Revolver Loan”). 
Interest payments for LIBOR Revolver Loans are payable on the last day of each interest period (either one-, three- 
or six- months, as selected by the borrower) and the maturity date, while interest payments for Adjusted Base Rate 
Revolver Loans are payable on the last business day of each month and the maturity date. The interest rate on 
December 31, 2022, was 5.67%.  
At December 31, 2022, according to the terms of the Credit Agreement, as amended, and based on our 
performance against the most restrictive covenant listed above, the Company had the availability to increase its 
borrowings by up to $200,372. This compares to an available borrowing availability of $178,705 as of December 31, 
2021. The level of borrowing capacity is driven by three factors: (1) our financial performance, as measured in 
EBITDA for trailing twelve-month period, (2) the inclusion of proforma EBITDA related to acquisitions completed 
during the preceding twelve months and (3) the leverage covenant (being the number of times EBITDA the 
Company may borrow under its credit facility agreement). 
The Company and the Lenders entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreement (“Amendment”), effective 
March 9, 2023, whereby LIBOR was replaced by SOFR with a credit spread adjustment of 10.0 bps for all SOFR 
periods. The revolving loans now bear interest at a variable rate based at borrower’s election with proper notice, on 
either (i) SOFR plus 0.1% per annum and the “Applicable Margin” or (ii) the greater of (x) the Prime Rate, (y) the 
Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, and (z) the Daily One-Month SOFR Rate plus 1.10%, plus, in the case of (x), (y) or 
(z) the Applicable Margin (“Adjusted Base Rate Revolver Loan”). In addition, the Amendment waived the 
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (“FCCR”) requirement for the year ended December 31, 2022, and adjusted 
the terms of the FCCR for the periods ending March 31, 2023 and June 30, 2023. The Company was in compliance 
with all other debt covenants as of December 31, 2022. 
Substantially all the Company’s assets are pledged as collateral under the Credit Agreement, as amended.  
(4) Income Taxes 
The provisions for income taxes are:
 
2022
2021
2020
Current:
Federal
$
7,439
$
6,684
$
(1,197)
State
2,173
2,149
(3)
Foreign
3,943
1,106
2,831
Deferred:
Federal
(2,763)
(2,369)
2,177
State
(1,243)
(1,039)
403
Foreign
(988)
1,635
(1,131)
Total
$
8,561
$
8,166
$
3,080
 

58
Total income tax expense differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate 
of 21.0% to income before income tax expense, as a result of the following:
 
2022
2021
2020
Computed tax expense at statutory federal rates
$
7,553
$
5,619
$
3,874
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
1,493
1,485
559
Unrecognized tax benefits
(1,441)
(1,783)
(2,092)
Bargain purchase gain on business acquisition
—
(35)
(978)
Income tax credits
(1,342)
(1,206)
(812)
Foreign tax rate differential
785
262
2,145
Stock based compensation
55
208
377
Global intangible low-taxed income
—
162
—
Change in valuation allowance
379
3,304
—
Return to provision
(693)
(651)
71
Nondeductible / (deductible) expenses
989
(103)
(111)
Gross receipts taxes
602
567
—
Other
181
337
48
Total
$
8,561
$
8,166
$
3,080
 
Income before provision for income taxes and losses on equity investments are:
 
2022
2021
2020
Domestic
$
28,739 $
21,212 $
11,858
International
7,226
5,929
6,589
Total
$
35,965 $
27,141 $
18,447
 

59
Temporary differences between the consolidated financial statements’ carrying amounts and tax bases of 
assets and liabilities that give rise to significant portions of the net deferred tax liability at December 31, 2022 and 
2021 relate to the following:
 
2022
2021
Deferred tax assets
Inventories
$
2,401 $
1,777
Program accrual
8,277
9,098
Vacation pay accrual
772
792
Accrued bonuses
1,707
1,250
Bad debt expense
1,450
1,361
Stock compensation
1,414
1,532
Domestic NOL carryforward
609
675
Foreign NOL carryforward
2,554
1,718
Tax credits
842
807
Lease liability
6,209
6,718
Accrued expenses
570
723
Unrealized foreign exchange loss
3,220
3,847
Section 174 capitalized costs
4,600
—
Other
—
744
Deferred tax assets
$
34,625 $
31,042
Less valuation allowance
(3,853)
(4,262)
Deferred tax assets, net
$
30,772 $
26,780
Deferred tax liabilities
Plant and equipment, principally due to 
differences in depreciation and capitalized 
interest
$
36,158 $
37,113
Lease assets
6,079
6,600
Prepaid expenses
1,685
1,666
Deferred revenue
777
1,014
Other
529
123
Deferred tax liabilities
$
45,228 $
46,516
Total net deferred tax liabilities
$
14,456 $
19,736
 
As of December 31, 2022, the Company maintained a full valuation allowance against its net deferred income 
tax assets related to the Company’s operations in Brazil, Spain, and Ukraine totaling $3,853. The valuation 
allowance decreased by $409 for the year ended December 31, 2022, of which $788 relates to unrealized foreign 
exchange losses and foreign currency translation included in other comprehensive income for 2022, partially offset 
by $379 included in the provision for income taxes for 2022. As of December 31, 2021, the Company recorded a full 
valuation allowance against the net deferred income tax assets related to the Company’s operations in Brazil totaling 
$4,262, of which $3,304 is included in the provision for income taxes for 2021 and $958 related to unrealized 
foreign exchange losses included in other comprehensive income for 2021.  
 Gross foreign NOLs related to the Company's foreign operations were $8,342 and $5,491 for the years ended 
December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Substantially all of the Company’s foreign NOLs can be carried forward 
indefinitely.
Gross domestic federal and state NOLs available across all jurisdictions in which we operate were $3,622 and 
$3,733 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company’s federal and state NOLs expire over varying 
intervals in the future and are subject to annual limitation in accordance with IRC Section 382.

60
The following is a roll-forward of the Company’s total gross unrecognized tax benefits, not including interest 
and penalties, for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 included in other liabilities, excluding current 
installments on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets:
 
2022
2021
Balance at beginning of year
$
2,426 $
3,222
Additions for tax positions related to the current year
225
223
Additions for tax positions related to the prior years
5
56
Reduction for tax positions related to the prior years
(745)
(971)
Effect of exchange rate changes
95
(104)
Balance at end of year
$
2,006 $
2,426
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision 
for income taxes in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 the 
Company had $2,161, $2,909, and $4,195, respectively in interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits 
on its consolidated balance sheets.
It is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change and $1,680 of unrecognized tax 
benefits is expected to be released within the next twelve months due to expiration of the statute of limitations.
The Company believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets detailed in the table above, 
exclusive of those in Brazil, Spain and Ukraine with the previously mentioned full valuation allowances, will be 
realized in the normal course of business. It is the intent of the Company that undistributed earnings of foreign 
subsidiaries are permanently reinvested. The amount of undistributed earnings was $17,012 as of December 31, 
2022. Upon distribution of earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company may still be subject to state 
income taxes and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries. Determination of the unrecognized 
deferred tax liability is not practical due to the complexities of a hypothetical calculation.
The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as to income tax in multiple state jurisdictions. 
Federal income tax returns of the Company are subject to Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examination for the 
2019 through 2021 tax years.  State income tax returns are subject to examination for the 2018 through 2021 tax 
years. The Company has foreign income tax returns subject to examination.
Beginning in 2022, The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ("TCJA"), requires taxpayers to capitalize and 
amortize research and development expenditures pursuant to Internal Revenue Code, or IRC, Section 174, which 
resulted in increases in the Company’s deferred tax asset balance and cash tax payments in the amount of $4,600 
and $6,180 for the year ended December 31, 2022, respectively.
(5) Litigation and Environmental
The Company records a liability on its consolidated financial statements for loss contingencies when a loss is 
known or considered probable, and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When determining the estimated loss or 
range of loss, significant judgment is required to estimate the amount and timing of a loss to be recorded. The 
Company recognizes legal expense in connection with loss contingencies as incurred.
DBCP Cases
Over the course of the past 30 years, AMVAC and/or the Company have been named or otherwise implicated 
in a number of lawsuits concerning injuries allegedly arising from either contamination of water supplies or personal 
exposure to 1, 2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (“DBCP”). DBCP was manufactured by several chemical companies, 
including Dow Chemical Company, Shell Oil Company and AMVAC (which ceased manufacture in about 1980) 
and was approved by the USEPA to control nematodes. DBCP was also applied on banana farms in Latin America. 
The USEPA suspended registrations of DBCP in October 1979, except for use on pineapples in Hawaii. That 
suspension was partially based on 1977 studies by other manufacturers that indicated a possible link between male 
fertility and exposure to DBCP among their factory production workers involved with producing the product.

61
Nicaraguan DBCP Matters
According to court filings in Chinandega, Nicaragua, 85 suits alleging personal injury allegedly due to 
exposure to DBCP and involving approximately 3,592 plaintiffs have been filed against AMVAC and other parties. 
Of these cases, only two – Flavio Apolinar Castillo et al. v. AMVAC et al., No. 535/04 and Luis Cristobal Martinez 
Suazo et al. v. AMVAC et al., No. 679/04 (which were filed in 2004 and involve 15 banana workers) – have been 
served on AMVAC. The company objected to personal jurisdiction and due process in those matters and demanded 
that the claims be litigated in the United States. The local court denied these objections in 2007, AMVAC appealed 
the denial, and, to the company’s knowledge, there has been no activity in these matters since that time. To date, 
plaintiffs have not had success in enforcing Nicaraguan judgments against domestic companies before U.S. courts. 
Nevertheless, AMVAC intends to defend these claims vigorously. Furthermore, the Company does not believe that a 
loss is either probable or reasonably estimable and has not recorded a loss contingency for these matters.
Delaware DBCP Cases
Chavez & Marquinez.  Two cases were filed independently in 2012 by the same law firm (HendlerLaw, P.C.) 
in Louisiana and Delaware involving claims on behalf of banana workers for personal injury allegedly arising from 
exposure to DBCP. Through several years of law and motion practice, the number of plaintiffs in the actions has 
been reduced from about 2,750 to 290 banana workers from Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala and Panama, and both 
cases have been consolidated before the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (USDC DE No. 
1:12-CV-00695 & 00697). Discovery commenced in 2018 and has consisted largely of seeking medical 
examinations from the remaining plaintiffs. In December 2022, defendants in this matter filed a motion for summary 
judgment against the Ecuadorian plaintiffs under the theory that the statute of limitations for negligence barred the 
action. Briefing on the motion is set to conclude in March 2023. At this stage in the proceedings, the Company does 
not believe that a loss is probable or reasonably estimable and has not recorded a loss contingency for these matters. 
Hawaiian DBCP Matters
Patrickson, et. al. v. Dole Food Company, et al. In October 1997, AMVAC was served with two complaints in 
which it was named as a defendant, filed in the Circuit Court, First Circuit, State of Hawai’i and in the Circuit Court 
of the Second Circuit, State of Hawai’i (two identical suits) entitled Patrickson, et. al. v. Dole Food Company, et. al 
(“Patrickson Case”) alleging damages sustained from injuries (including sterility) to banana workers caused by 
plaintiffs’ exposure to DBCP while applying the product in their native countries. Other named defendants include: 
Dole Food Company, Shell Oil Company and Dow Chemical Company. After several years of law and motion 
activity the parties stipulated that, because it was not named as a defendant in an earlier class action matter that gave 
rise to the tolling of the statute of limitations, AMVAC should be dismissed from this matter. Thus, we expect that 
the Company will be dismissed with prejudice from this action as soon as the court issues an order. There has been 
no activity in this matter since November 2018. Further, the Company does not believe that a loss is probable or 
reasonably estimable and has not recorded a loss contingency for this matter.
Adams v. Dole Food Company et al. On approximately November 23, 2007, AMVAC was served with a suit 
filed by two former Hawaiian pineapple workers (and their spouses), alleging cancer due to DBCP exposure; the 
action is captioned Adams v. Dole Food Company et al in the First Circuit for the State of Hawaii. Plaintiff alleges 
that they were exposed to DBCP between 1971 and 1975. AMVAC denies that any of its product could have been 
used at the times and locations alleged by these plaintiffs. Following the dismissal of Dole Food Company on the 
basis of the exclusive remedy of worker’s compensation benefits, plaintiffs appealed the dismissal. The court of 
appeals subsequently remanded the matter to the lower court in February 2014, effectively permitting plaintiffs to 
amend their complaint to circumvent the workers’ compensation bar. There has been no activity in the case since 
that time, and there is no estimated date of determination. The Company does not believe that a loss is either 
probable or reasonably estimable and has not recorded a loss contingency for this matter. 

62
Other Matters
Department of Justice ("DOJ") and Environmental Protection Agency Investigation.  On November 10, 2016, 
AMVAC was served with a grand jury subpoena from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District 
of Alabama, seeking documents regarding the importation, transportation, and management of a specific pesticide. 
The Company retained defense counsel to assist in responding to the subpoena and otherwise in defending the 
Company’s interests. AMVAC is cooperating in the investigation. After interviewing multiple witnesses (including 
three employees before a grand jury in February 2022) and making multiple document requests, the DOJ identified 
the Company and a manager-level employee as targets of the government’s investigation. DOJ’s investigation 
focused on potential violations of two environmental statutes, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 
Act (“FIFRA”) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), as well as obstruction of an agency 
proceeding and false statement statutes. In March 2022, the individual target entered into a plea agreement relating 
to provision of false information in a government proceeding. In July 2022, the DOJ sent correspondence to the 
Company’s counsel to the effect that it was focusing on potential RCRA violations relating to the reimportation of 
Australian containers in 2015. Our defense counsel spoke with DOJ on the subject in early October, and the DOJ, 
which expressed an interest in resolving the matter, stated that it would get back to the Company with its position. 
The governmental agencies involved in this investigation have a range of civil and criminal penalties they may 
seek to impose against corporations and individuals for violations of FIFRA, RCRA and other federal statutes 
including, but not limited to, injunctive relief, fines, penalties and modifications to business practices and 
compliance programs, including the appointment of a monitor. If violations are established, the amount of any fines 
or monetary penalties which could be assessed and the scope of possible non-monetary relief would depend on, 
among other factors, findings regarding the amount, timing, nature and scope of the violations, and the level of 
cooperation provided to the governmental authorities during the investigation. As a result, the Company cannot yet 
anticipate the timing or predict the ultimate resolution of this investigation, financial or otherwise or whether it 
could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, operations, financial condition and cash flow; 
accordingly, we have not recorded a loss contingency for this matter.  
Pitre etc. v. Agrocentre Ladauniere et al. On February 11, 2022, a strawberry grower named Les Enterprises 
Pitre, Inc. filed a complaint in the Superior Court, District of Labelle, Province of Quebec, Canada, entitled Pitre, 
etc. v. Agrocentre Ladauniere, Inc. etal, including Amvac Chemical Corporation, seeking damages in the amount of 
approximately $5 million arising from stunted growth of, and reduced yield from, its strawberry crop allegedly from 
the application of Amvac’s soil fumigant, Vapam, in spring of 2021. Examinations of plaintiff were held in mid-
August 2022, during which plaintiff in effect confirmed that he had planted his seedlings before expiration of the 
full time interval following product application (as per the product label), that he had failed to follow the practice of 
planting a few test seedlings before planting an entire farm, and that he had placed his blind trust in his application 
adviser on all manner of timing and rate. The company believes that the claims have no merit and intends to defend 
the matter. At this stage in the proceedings, there is not sufficient information to form a judgment as to either the 
probability or amount of loss; thus, the company has not set aside a reserve in connection with this matter.  
Catalano v. AMVAC Chemical Corp.  On June 6, 2022, AMVAC was served with a summons and complaint 
for a matter entitled Andrew Catalano and Ruth Catalano v. AMVAC in the Superior Court of the State of 
California, County of Orange (30-2022-01263987-CU-PL-CXC) in which plaintiff, who worked as a professional 
applicator of pesticides, including Orthene (for which AMVAC is registrant) seeks damages for an injury 
(specifically, cardiomyopathy) allegedly arising from his exposure to this product. AMVAC is unaware of any link 
between cardiovascular disease and Orthene (which has been commercially available for over 30 years) and believes 
that this case has no merit and intends to defend it vigorously. The Company filed an answer in early July, including 
multiple affirmative defenses. Further, the parties are exchanging document requests, and plaintiffs have been 
unable to supply any data establishing a causal link between use of this product and the heart condition that plaintiff 
alleges. At this stage, there is not sufficient information to form a judgment as to either the probability or amount of 
any loss; thus, the company has not set aside a reserve in connection with this matter.  

63
Notice of Intention to Suspend DCPA.  On April 28, 2022, the USEPA published a notice of intent to suspend 
(“NOITS”) DCPA, the active ingredient of an herbicide marketed by the Company under the name Dacthal. The 
agency cited as the basis for the suspension that the Company did not take appropriate steps to provide data studies 
requested in support of the registration review. In fact, over the course of several years, the Company cooperated in 
performing the vast majority of the nearly 90 studies requested by USEPA and had been working in good faith to 
meet the agency’s schedule. After an appeals court (the Environmental Appeals Board) clarified the proper standard 
for use at the hearing (namely, whether registrant took appropriate steps to respond to the data call-in), a hearing was 
held in January 2023 before the ALJ, by which time USEPA had narrowed the scope of its claim to nine outstanding 
studies, all of which have been started by the Company and none of which are necessary for USEPA to commence 
its risk assessment. The parties are now preparing post-hearing briefs, after the submission of which the ALJ will 
render a decision. During the course of these proceedings, AMVAC has been free to make, sell and distribute both 
the technical grade material and end-use product and may continue to do so unless and until there is an adverse 
ruling at both the trial and appellate level (if any). The Company believes that a loss is neither probable nor 
estimable and, consequently, has not set aside a reserve in connection with this matter. 
(6) Employee Deferred Compensation Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company maintains a deferred compensation plan (“the Plan”) for all eligible employees. The Plan calls 
for each eligible employee, at the employee’s election, to participate in an income deferral arrangement under 
Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k). The plan allows eligible employees to make contributions, which cannot 
exceed 100% of compensation, or the annual dollar limit set by the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matches 
the first 5% of employee contributions. The Company’s contributions to the Plan amounted to $2,409, $2,273 and 
$2,172 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
During 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the AVD Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP 
Plan”). The Plan allows eligible employees to purchase shares of common stock through payroll deductions at a 
discounted price. An original aggregate number of approximately 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common 
Stock, par value $0.10 per share (subject to adjustment for any stock dividend, stock split or other relevant changes 
in the Company’s capitalization) were allowed to be sold pursuant to the Plan, which is intended to qualify under 
Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan allows for purchases in a series of offering periods, each six 
months in duration, with new offering periods (other than the initial offering period) commencing on January 1 and 
July 1 of each year. The initial offering period commenced on July 1, 2001. Pursuant to action taken by the 
Company’s Board of Directors on December 10, 2010, the expiration of the Plan was extended to December 31, 
2013. The Plan was amended and restated on June 30, 2011, following stockholders’ ratification of the extended 
expiration date. The Plan was amended as of June 6, 2018, following stockholders’ ratification of a ten-year 
extension to the expiration date (which now stands at December 31, 2028). Under the Plan, as amended as of June 6, 
2018, 995,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were authorized. As of December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, 
491,940, 543,180, and 593,962 shares, respectively, remained available under the plan. The expense recognized 
under the Plan was immaterial during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Shares of common stock purchased through the Plan in 2022, 2021 and 2020 were 51,240, 50,782 and 49,668, 
respectively.
(7) Major Customers and International Sales
In 2022, there were three domestic customers that accounted for 18%, 13% and 8%, respectively, of the 
Company’s consolidated sales. In 2021, there were three domestic customers that accounted for 17%, 14%, and 8% 
of the Company’s consolidated sales. In 2020, there were three domestic customers that accounted for 17%, 12% 
and 10% of the Company’s consolidated sales.
The Company primarily sells its products to distributors, buying cooperatives, other co-operative groups and, 
in certain territories, end users, and extends credit based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition. The 
Company had three significant domestic customers who each accounted for approximately 15%, 3% and 3% of the 
Company’s receivables as of December 31, 2022. The Company had three significant domestic customers who each 
accounted for approximately 11%, 4% and 4% of the Company’s receivables as of December 31, 2021. The 
Company has long-standing relationships with its customers and the Company considers its overall credit risk for 
accounts receivables to be minimal.

64
The Company’s receivables, excluding allowances for doubtful accounts, by geography as of December 31, 
2022 and 2021 are summarized as follows:
2022
2021
Domestic receivables
$
65,825
$
66,987
International receivables
105,619
95,872
Total receivables
$
171,444
$
162,859
International sales for 2022, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:
2022
2021
2020
South and Central America
$ 124,525 $ 108,975 $
102,281
Mexico
45,995
40,724
33,517
Asia
26,588
26,234
19,290
Australia
19,674
21,061
9,902
Canada
14,860
10,377
10,572
Africa
8,840
3,468
6,072
Middle East
1,836
2,357
3,054
Europe
1,964
2,243
2,292
Total international net sales
$ 244,282 $ 215,439 $
186,980
(8) Product and Business Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company did not complete any acquisitions.
The Company completed one product acquisition during the year ended December 31, 2021. The acquisition 
was completed on July 1, 2021, for $10,000 in cash consideration. The acquisition was accounted for as an asset 
acquisition and the $10,000 in consideration was allocated as follows: product registrations and product rights 
$8,225, trade names and trademarks $1,650, and prepaid assets $125.       
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company completed two acquisitions:
On October 2, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of all outstanding stock of the Agrinos Group 
Companies ("Agrinos"), except for Agrinos AS. Agrinos has operating entities in the U.S., Mexico, India, Brazil, 
China, Ukraine, and Spain. Agrinos is a fully integrated biological input supplier with proprietary technology, 
manufacturing capacity, and global distribution capabilities. At closing, the Company paid cash consideration of 
$3,125, which was net of cash acquired of $1,813. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and 
resulted in a bargain gain.  The purchase consideration was allocated as follows: 
Trade receivables
$
2,277
Inventory and other current assets
5,371
Property, plant, and equipment
5,141
Product registrations and product rights
50
Liabilities assumed
(4,886)
Bargain
(4,828)
Total
$
3,125
Agrinos was acquired out of bankruptcy. This provided the Company with an opportunity to acquire Agrinos 
at an advantageous purchase price which was below the fair value of Agrinos’ net assets acquired, resulting in the 
bargain purchase gain. The liabilities assumed include liabilities of $407 related to income tax matters.

65
On October 8, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of all outstanding stock of AgNova Technologies 
Pty Ltd (“AgNova”). AgNova is an Australian entity that sources, develops, and distributes specialty crop protection 
and production solutions for agricultural and horticultural producers, and for selected non-crop users. The purchase 
price consideration was as follows:
 
Cash
$
16,997
Less cash acquired
(157)
Contingent consideration
1,052
Total consideration
$
17,892
The fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated using a Monte Carlo Simulation. The acquisition 
was accounted for as a business combination and the purchase consideration was allocated as follows:  
Trade receivables
$
1,508
Inventory and other current assets
5,698
Property, plant, and equipment
73
Product registrations and product rights
8,327
Trade names and trademarks
351
Distribution agreements
3,584
Customer relationships and customer lists
386
Goodwill
4,618
Liabilities assumed
(6,653)
Total consideration
$
17,892
The liabilities assumed include liabilities of $3,857 related to income tax matters.
Cash paid at closing for the asset acquisitions and business combinations was funded through our revolving 
line of credit. Pro-forma financial information is not included herein as the pro-forma impact of the acquisitions is 
not material.

66
(9) Intangible Assets and Goodwill 
The following schedule represents intangible assets recognized in connection with product acquisitions (See 
Note 1 for the Company’s accounting policy regarding intangible assets):
 
 
Amount
Intangible assets at December 31, 2019
$
198,261
Additions during fiscal 2020
12,675
Write offs
(41)
Impact of movement in exchange rates
(637)
Amortization expense
(12,744)
Intangible assets at December 31, 2020
197,514
Additions during fiscal 2021
10,524
Measurement period adjustment
4,226
Impact of movement in exchange rates
(710)
Amortization expense
(13,713)
Intangible assets at December 31, 2021
197,841
Additions during fiscal 2022
1,292
Impact of movement in exchange rates
(516)
Amortization expense
(13,953)
Intangible assets at December 31, 2022
$
184,664
Goodwill at December 31, 2019
$
46,673
Additions during fiscal 2020
8,830
Other
617
Impact of movement in exchange rates
(4,012)
Goodwill at December 31, 2020
52,108
Measurement period adjustment
(4,054)
Impact of movement in exchange rates
(1,794)
Goodwill at December 31, 2021
46,260
Impact of movement in exchange rates
750
Goodwill at December 31, 2022
$
47,010
Intangible assets and goodwill at December 31, 2022
$
231,674
The following schedule represents the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of intangible 
assets and goodwill. Product rights and trademarks are amortized over their expected useful lives of 25 years. 
Customer lists are amortized over their expected useful lives of nine to ten years. The amortization expense is 
included in operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. 
 
2022
2021
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization
Net Book
Value
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization
Net Book
Value
Product Rights
$272,339 $
121,209 $151,130 $271,632 $
110,090 $161,542
Trademarks
40,459
11,615
28,844
40,578
9,870
30,708
Customer Lists
11,204
6,514
4,690
10,966
5,375
5,591
Total intangibles assets
324,002
139,338
184,664
323,176
125,335
197,841
Goodwill
47,010
—
47,010
46,260
—
46,260
Total intangibles and goodwill
$371,012 $
139,338 $231,674 $369,436 $
125,335 $244,101
Domestic
194,395
92,352
102,043
193,091
84,477
108,614
International
176,617
46,986
129,631
176,345
40,858
135,487
Total intangibles and goodwill
$371,012 $
139,338 $231,674 $369,436 $
125,335 $244,101

67
The following schedule represents future amortization charges related to intangible assets:
 
Year ending December 31,
Amount
2023
$
13,299
2024
13,001
2025
12,819
2026
12,713
2027
12,476
Thereafter
120,356
$
184,664
(10) Contingent Consideration
The following schedule represents the Company’s contingent consideration liability under acquisitions 
agreements:
Amount
Obligations under acquisition agreements at December 31, 2019
$
1,244
Additional obligations acquired
2,044
Fair value adjustment
250
Accretion of discounted liabilities
16
Payments on existing obligations
(1,227)
Foreign exchange effect
141
Obligations under acquisition agreements at December 31, 2020
2,468
Purchase price adjustment
(955)
Fair value adjustment
758
Accretion of discounted liabilities
(8)
Payments on existing obligations
(1,301)
Foreign exchange effect
(176)
Obligations under acquisition agreements at December 31, 2021
786
Fair value adjustment
610
Accretion of discounted liabilities
27
Payments on existing obligations
(1,389)
Foreign exchange effect
(34)
Obligations under acquisition agreements at December 31, 2022
$
—
(11) Commitments
We enter into various obligations in the ordinary course of business, generally of a short-term nature. They 
primarily relate to purchase commitments for inventory and orders submitted for equipment for our production 
plants as well as service agreements.
(12) Research and Development
Research and development expenses which are included in operating expenses were $10,829, $10,354 and 
$8,757 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

68
(13) Equity Plan Awards
Under the Company’s Equity Incentive Plan of 1993, as amended (“the Plan”), all employees are eligible to 
receive non-assignable and non-transferable restricted stock, options to purchase common stock, and other forms of 
equity. As of December 31, 2022, the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the Plan is 
1,524,567.
The below tables illustrate the Company’s stock-based compensation, unamortized stock-based compensation, 
and remaining weighted average period for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. This projected 
expense will change if any stock options and restricted stock are granted or cancelled prior to the respective 
reporting periods, or if there are any changes required to be made for estimated forfeitures.
 
Stock-Based
Compensation
Unamortized
Stock-Based
Compensation
Remaining
Weighted
Average
Period 
(years)
December 31, 2022
Restricted Stock
$
4,407 $
6,585
1.8
Unrestricted Stock
499
217
0.4
Performance-Based Restricted Stock
778
2,441
1.8
Total
$
5,684 $
9,243
December 31, 2021
Restricted Stock
$
5,682 $
6,804
1.8
Unrestricted Stock
421
187
0.4
Performance-Based Restricted Stock
777
2,888
1.8
Total
$
6,880 $
9,879
December 31, 2020
Restricted Stock
$
3,166 $
6,954
1.9
Unrestricted Stock
461
183
0.4
Performance-Based Restricted Stock
2,934
3,352
1.9
Total
$
6,561 $
10,489
 
The Company also granted stock options in past periods. All outstanding stock options are fully vested and 
exercisable and no expense was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
Restricted and Unrestricted Stock
A summary of nonvested restricted and unrestricted stock is presented below:
 
December 31, 2022
December 31, 2021
Number
of Shares
Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
Number
of Shares
Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
Nonvested shares at January 1st
817,290
$
17.04
820,624
$
16.64
Granted
256,417
23.53
295,619
20.00
Vested
(262,521)
17.84
(244,651)
19.23
Forfeited
(69,136)
18.58
(54,302)
17.11
Nonvested shares at December 31st
742,050
$
18.86
817,290
$
17.04

69
Performance-Based Restricted Stock
A summary of nonvested performance-based stock is presented below:
December 31, 2022
December 31, 2021
Number
of Shares
Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
Number
of Shares
Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
Nonvested shares at January 1st
379,061
$
16.43
391,771
$
16.26
Granted
83,190
23.63
102,043
20.03
Additional granted based on performance achievement
(68,484)
16.87
71,180
20.53
Vested
(51,308)
17.09
(175,087)
19.78
Forfeited
(23,760)
17.21
(10,846)
16.89
Nonvested shares at December 31st
318,699
$
18.05
379,061
$
16.43
Performance Based Restricted Stock Granted in 2022— During the year ended December 31, 2022, the 
Company issued a total of 83,190 performance-based shares to employees. The shares granted during 2022 have an 
average fair value of $23.63. The fair value was determined by using the publicly traded share price as of the market 
close on the date of grant and Monte Carlo valuation method. The Company will recognize as expense the value of 
the performance-based shares over the required service period from grant date. The shares will cliff vest on April 20, 
2025, with a measurement period commencing January 1, 2022, and ending December 31, 2024. Eighty percent of 
these performance-based shares are based upon the financial performance of the Company, specifically, an earnings 
before interest and tax (“EBIT”) goal weighted at 50% and a net sales goal weighted at 30%. The remaining 20% of 
performance-based shares are based upon AVD stock price appreciation over the same performance measurement 
period. The EBIT and net sales goals measure the relative growth of the Company’s EBIT and net sales for the 
performance measurement period, as compared to the median growth of EBIT and net sales for an identified peer 
group. The stockholder return goal measures the relative growth of the fair market value of the Company’s stock 
price over the performance measurement period, as compared to that of the Russell 2000 Index and the median fair 
market value of the common stock of the comparator companies, identified in the Company’s 2021 Proxy 
Statement. All parts of these awards vest in three years but are subject to reduction to a minimum (or even zero) for 
recording less than the targeted performance and to increase to a maximum of 200% for achieving in excess of the 
targeted performance. 
Performance Based Restricted Stock Granted in 2021— During the year ended December 31, 2021, the 
Company issued a total of 102,043 performance-based shares to employees. The shares granted during 2021 have an 
average fair value of $20.03. The fair value was determined by using the publicly traded share price as of the market 
close on the date of grant and Monte Carlo valuation method. The Company will recognize as expense the value of 
the performance-based shares over the required service period from grant date. The shares will cliff vest on April 16, 
2024, with a measurement period commencing January 1, 2021, and ending December 31, 2023. Eighty percent of 
these performance-based shares are based upon the financial performance of the Company, specifically, an EBIT 
goal weighted at 50% and a net sales goal weighted at 30%. The remaining 20% of performance-based shares are 
based upon AVD stock price appreciation over the same performance measurement period. The EBIT and net sales 
goals measure the relative growth of the Company’s EBIT and net sales for the performance measurement period, as 
compared to the median growth of EBIT and net sales for an identified peer group. The stockholder return goal 
measures the relative growth of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price over the performance 
measurement period, as compared to that of the Russell 2000 Index and the median fair market value of the common 
stock of the comparator companies, identified in the Company’s 2020 Proxy Statement. All parts of these awards 
vest in three years but are subject to reduction to a minimum (or even zero) for recording less than the targeted 
performance and to increase to a maximum of 200% for achieving in excess of the targeted performance. 

70
Performance Based Restricted Stock Granted in 2020— During the year ended December 31, 2020, the 
Company issued a total of 160,706 performance-based shares to employees. The shares granted during 2020 have an 
average fair value of $14.29. The fair value was determined by using the publicly traded share price as of the market 
close on the date of grant and Monte Carlo valuation method. The Company will recognize as expense the value of 
the performance-based shares over the required service period from grant date. The shares will cliff vest on May 13, 
2023, with a measurement period commencing October 1, 2020, and ending March 31, 2023. Eighty percent of these 
performance-based shares are based upon the financial performance of the Company, specifically, an EBIT goal 
weighted at 50% and a net sales goal weighted at 30%. The remaining 20% of performance-based shares are based 
upon AVD stock price appreciation over the same performance measurement period. The EBIT and net sales goals 
measure the relative growth of the Company’s EBIT and net sales for the performance measurement period, as 
compared to the median growth of EBIT and net sales for an identified peer group. The stockholder return goal 
measures the relative growth of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price over the performance 
measurement period, as compared to that of the Russell 2000 Index and the median fair market value of the common 
stock of the comparator companies, identified in the Company’s 2020 Proxy Statement. All parts of these awards 
vest in three years but are subject to reduction to a minimum (or even zero) for recording less than the targeted 
performance and to increase to a maximum of 200% for achieving in excess of the targeted performance. 
In 2022, the Company assessed the likelihood of achieving the performance measures based on peer group 
information currently available for the performance-based shares granted in 2020. Based on the performance thus 
far, the Company has concluded that it is likely that the performance measure based on EBIT will not be met and net 
sales will be met at 150% of targeted performance and have recorded the related additional expense in 2022. The 
performance shares based on market price are expected to be met at 166% of targeted performance. The effect of 
market conditions for performance shares based on market are included in the grant date fair value valuation and no 
additional expenses were recognized in 2022.
During 2022, the Company concluded that the performance measure based on EBIT and net sales for the 
performance-based shares granted in 2019, when compared to the peer group, was met at 0% for EBIT and 123.8% 
for net sales of targeted performance and all related additional expenses were recorded as of December 31, 2022. 
The 2019 performance shares based on market price was met at 28.5%; however, the market condition is reflected in 
the grant date fair value valuation and no additional expenses were recognized. As a result, 68,484 shares were 
forfeited since the Company did not achieve performance targets when compared to the peer group.   
Stock Options
Under the terms of the Company’s ISOP, under which options to purchase common stock can be issued, all 
employees are eligible to receive non-assignable and non-transferable options to purchase shares. The exercise price 
of any option may not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant; provided, however, that 
the exercise price of any option granted to an eligible employee owning more than 10% of the outstanding common 
stock may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the shares underlying such option on the date of grant. 
No options granted may be exercisable more than ten years after the date of grant.
In 2022, 2021 and 2020, no options were granted.
Incentive Stock Option Plans
Activity of the incentive stock option plans:
Number of 
Shares
Weighted
Average
Price Per
Share
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2019
332,823
$
9.14
Options exercised
(196,736)
7.79
Options forfeited
(13,000)
7.50
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2020
123,087
11.48
Options exercised
(15,051)
11.41
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2021
108,036
11.49
Options exercised
(39,140)
11.49
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2022
68,896
$
11.49

71
 
 
Outstanding stock options at December 31, 2022, summarized by exercise price:
 
Outstanding Weighted Average
Exercise Price Per Share
Number of 
Shares
Remaining
Life
(Months)
Exercise
Price
Outstanding stock options, December 31, 2022
68,896
24
$
11.49
Performance Incentive Stock Option Plan 
Activity of the performance incentive stock option plan:
 
Number of 
Shares
Weighted
Average
Price Per
Share
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2019
120,782
$
11.49
Options exercised
(6,124)
11.49
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2021 and 2020
114,658
$
11.49
Options exercised
(32,850)
11.49
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2022
81,808
$
11.49
 
All the performance incentive stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2022, have an exercise price per 
share of $11.49 and a remaining life of 24 months.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2022, 2021, and 2020 was $877, $119, and $1,393, 
respectively. Cash received from stock options exercised during 2022, 2021, and 2020 was $827, $172, and $1,533, 
respectively. All outstanding options are fully vested and the intrinsic value amounted to $1,540 as of December 31, 
2022.
 
(14) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table lists the beginning balance, annual activity and ending balance of foreign currency 
translation adjustment included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss:
 
Balance, December 31, 2019
$
(5,698)
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax effects of $2,521
(3,624)
Balance, December 31, 2020
(9,322)
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax effects of $76
(4,462)
Balance, December 31, 2021
(13,784)
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax effects of ($245)
1,602
Balance, December 31, 2022
$
(12,182)
 
(15) Equity Method Investment
On August 2, 2016, AMVAC BV entered into a joint venture with Huifeng (Hong Kong) Ltd, which is a 
wholly owned subsidiary of the Huifeng Group. The resulting entity, Hong Kong JV, was intended to focus on 
activities such as market access and technology transfer between the two members. AMVAC BV is a 50% owner of 
the entity. 
On June 27, 2017, both AMVAC BV and Huifeng (Hong Kong) Ltd. made individual capital contributions of 
$950 to the Hong Kong JV. As of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company’s ownership position in the 
Hong Kong JV was 50%. The Company utilizes the equity method of accounting with respect to this investment. 

72
On July 7, 2017, the Hong Kong JV purchased the shares of Profeng Australia, Pty Ltd. (“Profeng”), for a 
total consideration of $1,900. The purchase consists of Profeng Australia, Pty Ltd Trustee and Profeng Australia 
Unit Trust. Both Trust and Trustee were previously owned by Huifeng (via its wholly owned subsidiary Huifeng 
(Hong Kong) Ltd). For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, the Company recognized losses of $0, 
$388 (including a full impairment charge of $288 of the Company’s remaining book value of its Hong Kong JV 
investment) and $125, respectively, as a result of the Company’s ownership position in the Hong Kong JV. The 
Hong Kong JV is an inactive entity.  
(16) Equity Investments
In February 2016, AMVAC BV made an equity investment of $3,283 in Biological Products for Agriculture 
(“Bi-PA”). Bi-PA develops biological plant protection products that can be used for the control of pests and disease 
of agricultural crops. As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Company’s ownership position in Bi-PA was 
15%. Since this investment does not have readily determinable fair value, the Company has elected to measure the 
investment at cost less impairment, if any, and to record an increase or decrease for changes resulting from 
observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of Bi-PA. The Company 
periodically reviews the investment for possible impairment. The Company recorded an impairment charge in the 
amount of $399 during the year ended December 31, 2021. There were no impairment or observable price changes 
on the investment during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2020. The investment is recorded within other 
assets on the consolidated balance sheets and amounted to $2,884 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. 
On April 1, 2020, AMVAC purchased 6.25 million shares, an ownership of approximately 8%, of common 
stock of Clean Seed Capital Group Ltd. (TSX Venture Exchange: “CSX”) for $1,190. The shares are publicly 
traded, have a readily determinable fair value, and are considered a Level 1 investment. The fair value of the stock 
amounted to $784 and $1,516 as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and the Company recorded losses of 
$732 and $391 and a gain of $717 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The 
investment is recorded within other assets on the consolidated balance sheets and amounted to $784 and $1,516 as of 
December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. 
(17) Share Repurchase Programs
The Company periodically repurchases shares of its common stock under a board-authorized repurchase 
program through a combination of open market transactions and accelerated share repurchase ("ASR") 
arrangements.
On August 22, 2022, pursuant to a Board of Directors resolution, the Company entered into an ASR to 
repurchase $20,000 of its common stock. Under the ASR agreement, the Company paid $20,000 and immediately 
received an initial delivery of 802,810 shares in the amount of $16,000, based on a price of $19.93 per share, which 
represented 80% of the notional amount of the ASR based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on 
the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") on August 22, 2022. On December 14, 2022, the ASR was completed, and 
pursuant to the settlement terms of the ASR, the Company received an additional 131,892 shares of its common 
stock. The average price paid for all of the shares delivered under the ASR was $21.40 per share.
On March 8, 2022, pursuant to a Board of Directors resolution, the Company announced its intention to 
repurchase an aggregate number of up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock, par value $0.10 per share, in the 
open market over the succeeding one year, subject to limitations and restrictions under applicable securities laws. 
During 2022, the Company purchased 734,150 shares of its common stock for a total of $14,002 at an average price 
of $19.07 per share.
On August 30, 2021, pursuant to a Board of Directors resolution, the Company announced its intention to 
repurchase an aggregate number of 300,000 shares of its common stock, par value $0.10 per share, in the open 
market over the succeeding six months. During 2021, the Company purchased 300,000 shares of its common stock 
for a total of $4,579 at an average price of $15.26 per share.

73
The shares and respective amount are recorded as treasury shares on the Company’s consolidated balance 
sheets.  The table below summarized the number of shares of the Company's common stock that were repurchased 
during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. The Company did not repurchase any of its common stock in 
2020.
Year ended
Total number of
shares purchased
Average price paid
per share
Total amount paid
December 31, 2022
1,668,852
$
20.37
$
34,002
December 31, 2021
300,000
$
15.26
$
4,579
(18) Supplemental Cash Flows Information
2022
2021
2020
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest
$ 3,834
$ 3,520
$ 5,313
Income taxes, net
$ 19,960
$ 5,796
$ 3,881
Non-cash transactions:
ROU assets in exchange for lease liabilities
$ 4,468
$ 18,521
$ 6,309
Deferred consideration in connection with business and 
asset acquisitions
$
610
$
758
$ 2,630
Cash dividends declared and included in accrued 
expenses
$
851
$
594
$
592

Exhibit 21
AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES
Subsidiaries of the Company and the jurisdiction in which each company was incorporated are listed below. Unless otherwise 
indicated parenthetically, 100% of the voting securities of each subsidiary are owned by the Company. All companies indicated with 
an asterisk (*) are subsidiaries of AMVAC. All of the following subsidiaries are included in the Company’s consolidated financial 
statements: 
AMVAC Chemical Corporation
California
GemChem, Inc.
California
2110 Davie Corporation (formerly ABSCO Distributing)
California
AMVAC Chemical UK Ltd*
England
AMVAC do Brasil Representácoes Ltda*
Brazil
Amvac Mexico S. De R.L. De C.V.*
Mexico
AMVAC de Costa Rica Srl
Costa Rica
AVD International LLC*
Delaware
AMVAC Netherlands BV*
Netherlands
Envance Technologies, LLC* 
Delaware
OHP Inc.*
California
Amvac Colombia SAS
Columbia
AgriCenter S.A
Costa Rica
Tyratech, Inc.
Delaware
American Vanguard Australia PTY Ltd
Australia
Amvac Singapore PTE Ltd
Singapore
AMVAC do Brazil 3p LTDA
Brazil
Amvac Canada ULC
Canada
Amvac Hong Kong Limited
Hong Kong
AgNova Technologies Pty Ltd
Australia
Agrinos Biotech (Shanghai) Co., LTD
China
Agrinos do Brazil Fertilizantes Biologicos LTDA
Brasil
Agrinos India Private Limited
India
Agrinos Ukraine LLC
Ukraine
Agrinos Iberia S.L.
Spain
Bioderpac SA de CV
Mexico

Exhibit 23
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
American Vanguard Corporation
Newport Beach, California
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-125813, 333-102381, 333-
76218, and 333-64220) of American Vanguard Corporation of our reports dated March 16, 2023, relating to the consolidated financial 
statements and schedule, and the effectiveness of American Vanguard Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, which 
appear in this Form 10-K.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Costa Mesa, California
March 16, 2023

Exhibit 31.1
AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Eric G. Wintemute, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of American Vanguard Corporation;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact 
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading 
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly 
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the 
periods presented in this report;
4.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and 
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined 
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under 
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is 
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be 
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the 
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report our 
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this 
report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the 
Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has 
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; 
and
5.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over 
financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors:
(a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting 
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial 
information; and
(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the 
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date: March 16, 2023
 
/s/ Eric G. Wintemute
 
 
Eric G. Wintemute
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the 
Board

Exhibit 31.2
AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, David T. Johnson, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of American Vanguard Corporation;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact 
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading 
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all 
material respects the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the 
periods presented in this report;
4.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and 
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined 
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under 
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is 
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be 
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the 
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report our 
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this 
report based on such evaluation; and
(d)
disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the 
Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has 
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; 
and
5.
The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over 
financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors:
(a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting 
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial 
information; and
(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the 
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date: March 16, 2023
 
/s/ David T. Johnson
 
 
David T. Johnson
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting 
Officer

Exhibit 32.1
AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of American Vanguard Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending 
December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief 
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) 
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material 
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.
 
/s/ ERIC G. WINTEMUTE
Eric G. Wintemute,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
/s/ DAVID T. JOHNSON
David T. Johnson
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
March 16, 2023
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or 
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 
906, has been provided to American Vanguard Corporation and will be retained by American Vanguard Corporation and furnished to 
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and 
shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.