American
Woodmark
2013
A n n u a l R e p o r t
tm
table ofcontents
1 Mission Statement
2 Company Profile
3 Financial Highlights
3 Market Information
4 Letter from the Chief Executive Officer
11 Five-Year Selected Financial Information
12 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
23 Consolidated Financial Statements
27 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
45 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
46 Management’s Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting
47 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm —
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
48 Stock Performance Graph
49 Directors and Executive Officers
49 Corporate Information
mission statement
creating value
through people
WHO WE ARE
American Woodmark is an organization of employees and shareholders who have
combined their resources to pursue a common goal.
WHAT WE DO
Our common goal is to create value by providing kitchens and baths “of pride” for
the American family.
WHY WE DO IT
We pursue this goal to earn a profit, which allows us to reward our shareholders and
employees and to make a contribution to our society.
HOW WE DO IT
Four principles guide our actions:
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION Providing the best possible quality, service and value
to the greatest number of people. Doing whatever is reasonable, and sometimes unrea-
sonable, to make certain that each customer’s needs are met each and every day.
INTEGRITY Doing what is right. Caring about the dignity and rights of each
individual. Acting fairly and responsibly with all parties. Being a good citizen
in the communities in which we operate.
TEAMWORK Understanding that we must all work together if we are to be success-
ful. Realizing that each individual must contribute to the team to remain a member
of the team.
EXCELLENCE Striving to perform every job or action in a superior way. Being
innovative, seeking new and better ways to get things done. Helping all individuals to
become the best that they can be in their jobs and careers.
ONCE WE’VE DONE IT
When we achieve our goal good things happen: sales increase, profits are made,
shareholders and employees are rewarded, jobs are created, our communities
benefit, we have fun and our customers are happy and proud—with a new kitchen
or bath from American Woodmark.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 1
companyprofile
American Woodmark Corporation manufactures and distributes
kitchen cabinets and vanities for the remodeling and new home con-
struction markets. The Company operates 9 manufacturing facilities
located in Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Tennessee,
Virginia and West Virginia and 9 service centers across the country.
American Woodmark Corporation was incorporated in 1980 and
became a public company through a common stock offering in 1986.
The Company offers approximately 550 cabinet lines in a wide variety
of designs, materials and finishes. Products are sold across the
United States through a network of independent dealers and distrib-
utors and directly to home centers and major builders. The Com-
pany’s remodeling sales comprised 63% of sales during fiscal 2013,
with the remaining 37% sold to the new home market. References
in this annual report to fiscal years mean the Company’s fiscal year,
which ends on April 30.
The Company believes it is one of the three largest manufacturers
of kitchen cabinets in the United States.
2
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
market
information
American Woodmark Corporation common
stock is quoted on The NASDAQ Global Select
Market under the “AMWD” symbol. Common
stock per share market prices and cash divi-
dends declared during the last two fiscal years
were as follows:
MARKET PRICE DIVIDENDS
DECLARED
High
Low
(in dollars)
FISCAL 2013
First quarter
$18.95
$15.46
$0.00
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter
23.30
29.28
36.68
16.45
21.66
27.63
0.00
0.00
0.00
FISCAL 2012
First quarter
$22.51
$15.73
$0.09
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter
19.87
17.99
19.52
11.53
10.88
13.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
As of May 16, 2013, there were approximately
6,500 shareholders of record of the Company’s
common stock. Included are approximately
52% of the Company’s employees, who are
shareholders through the American Woodmark
Stock Ownership Plan. The Company paid
dividends on its common stock during the first
quarter of 2012 and then its quarterly dividend
was suspended. The determination as to the
payment and the amount of any future dividends
will be made by the Board of Directors from time
to time and will depend on the Company’s then-
current financial condition, capital requirements,
results of operations and any other factors then
deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 3
financial
highlights
(in thousands, except per share data)
20131
20121,2
20112
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
OPERATIONS
Net sales
Operating income (loss)
Net income (loss)
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic
Diluted
Average shares outstanding
Basic
Diluted
FINANCIAL POSITION
Working capital
Total assets
Long-term debt, less current maturities
Shareholders’ equity
Long-term debt to capital ratio3
$ 630,437
17,221
9,758
$
0.67
0.66
14,563
14,833
$ 108,810
293,993
23,594
146,195
13.9%
$ 515,814
(33,446)
(20,786)
$452,589
(31,054)
(20,018)
$
(1.45)
(1.45)
$
(1.40)
(1.40)
14,344
14,344
14,252
14,252
$ 71,881
265,121
23,790
130,020
15.5%
$ 69,572
268,370
24,655
153,965
13.8%
1 The Company announced plans to realign its manufacturing network during fiscal 2012.
The Company recorded restructuring charges related to these initiatives in fiscal 2012 that
increased operating loss, net loss and loss per share by $15,917,000, $9,710,000 and $0.68,
respectively. During fiscal 2013, the charges related to these initiatives decreased operating
income, net income and earnings per share by $1,433,000, $874,000 and $0.06, respectively.
2 The Company performed a reduction-in-force of salaried personnel and announced plans
to realign its manufacturing network during fiscal 2009. The impact of these initiatives in
fiscal 2011 increased operating loss, net loss and loss per share by $62,000, $39,000 and
$0.00, respectively. During fiscal 2012, these initiatives increased operating loss, net loss
and loss per share by $404,000, $246,000 and $0.01, respectively.
3 Defined as long-term debt, less current maturities, divided by the sum of long-term
debt and shareholders’ equity.
to our
shareholders
KENT B. GUICHARD
Chairman and CEO
Our goal as we began fiscal 2013 was to return the Company to profitability while con-
tinuing our commitment to build the strength of the organization, protect our market
position, and invest in delivering a superior customer experience. The year was not
without challenges, some of our own making. But as we look back over the last twelve
months, I am pleased to report that we were ultimately successful on all fronts.
We entered our fiscal year last spring trying to make some sense of a complicated
and often contradictory mix of market indicators. Supporting an optimistic outlook
was an improvement in builder sentiment based on increased traffic through model
homes and improved sales contract activity. Permits, construction starts, and home
completions were trending upward. Foreclosures and mortgage delinquencies were
at multiple year lows. Sales of existing homes were showing signs of life and prices
were slowly rising. On the side of pessimism, consumers were showing signs of
additional stress. Savings rates were dropping. Debt was increasing. Gas prices rising.
And consumer confidence wavering.
As I shared in this letter last year, most worrisome was the employment outlook. The
generally cited government unemployment rate was declining, but real unemployment
4
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
remained painfully high. Adding discouraged workers no longer
actively seeking a job, part-time workers that would rather have
a full-time position, and underemployed full-time workers to the
official unemployment number painted a less than encouraging
picture. Our ultimate view was that the financial pressure on both
unemployed and underemployed families, combined with gen-
eral nervousness about the future, would continue to suppress
demand for big ticket, discretionary spending. This would be
particularly true for projects related to the battered and bruised
housing sector. As a result, we began our fiscal 2013 anticipat-
ing a modest increase in revenue based on flat unit demand
and some improvement in product mix driven by new products.
As we entered the summer, it became clear that the upward trend
in new construction activity was not only continuing, but strength-
ening. By the time calendar 2012 ended, total housing starts had
increased 30%. Single family starts, more relevant to our business,
increased 25%. In this environment our new construction related
revenue increased more than 40%, significantly outpacing the
industry. Our performance was the result of gaining share with
builders who were in turn gaining share. Aligning with select
national, regional and local builders intent on offering upgraded
features also allowed us to increase our average revenue per job.
increase. As we began the year, our manufacturing organization
Unlike the new construction market, remodel demand
remained tepid throughout the year. Private Residential Invest-
ment at 2.7% of Gross Domestic Product was slightly improved
from the 2.5% in the prior year, but still well below the histori-
cal average. The lack of homeowner enthusiasm in making
significant capital investments in their property was clearly
the dominant factor in our category. Despite this headwind,
our remodel business grew at a high single digit rate during
the year based on our long standing partnerships with the
big box home centers and our developing dealer business.
Our Waypoint brand, launched three years ago and designed
to meet the unique needs of the dealer channel, accounted
for almost half of our overall growth rate in remodel.
Combined net sales for the fiscal year increased over 20%,
our third consecutive year of double digit growth. Gross margin
rose by over 50%. The leverage on incremental volume, however,
was below our expectations given the magnitude of the revenue
had just completed two plant closures announced in the fall
of 2011 and was in the midst of refining new material flows and
absorbing the production volume into our remaining facilities.
At the same time, we were presented with the unanticipated
ramp up in demand from our new construction customers. We
did not handle the combination with the efficiency or effective-
ness that we expect of ourselves. We responded by absorbing
significant excess costs to protect our customers. As a result,
our incremental margins suffered during the first half of the year.
We completed our corrective actions during the third fiscal
quarter and returned to our standard of operating performance
during the fourth fiscal quarter. Leverage on incremental volume
during the last quarter was more acceptable with gross margin
as a percent of sales reaching almost 19%.
The combination of additional volume, leverage in cost of goods
sold, and continued cost management in our sales, general
and administrative accounts resulted in net income of $10 million
excluding restructuring charges and net insurance proceeds.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 5
Our employees did an outstanding job during the entire year,
delivering a remarkable turnaround in a difficult on-going
environment. Operating income before charges and proceeds
improved by almost $35 million from the prior year and the
Company posted a net profit for the first time since the depths
of the housing cycle began in 2009.
While our focus during the year was the return to profitability,
we remained cognizant of the importance of maintaining finan-
cial strength. Cash, including restricted cash, increased by
almost $23 million to a record $97 million at year end. For the
foreseeable future, we will continue to be cautious in the man-
agement of the balance sheet. While fiscal 2013 was encour-
aging, we are by no means out of the woods with regard to the
economic environment. Many risks remain. We will make sure
that we retain our financial strength. As we gain more comfort
with the path ahead, we will first and foremost look to reinvest
in the business as the industry rebuilds to historically normal
levels of activity. To the extent that we determine excess cash
exists above and beyond prudent reserves and capital require-
may not satisfy all in the short term, we believe it is in the best
interests of the long term Shareholder.
In 2007, we launched the 2013 Vision with a goal to provide
a superior customer experience. Over the last six years, we
have changed the conversation from simply price and product
to the total experience. Service and support have become
the third leg of the stool, in many cases even surpassing the
importance of product and price to our customers. Our ability
to not only weather the economic storm, but to consistently
generate revenue growth in excess of the market, is a direct
result of pursuing our Vision. Customers ultimately vote with
their wallets and our ability to gain share is a direct reflection
of providing a total experience and value that others are not.
ments, we will look to return this amount to shareholders
As we look forward to our next six year vision, we will challenge
under our stock repurchase authorization when the opportu-
ourselves to think on a much bigger stage. The goal is no longer
nity arises to enhance Shareholder value. While this approach
to be a great cabinet company. Or even a great building materials
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 7
company. But a great company on par with other great companies.
A world class company regardless of industry. By 2019 we will:
dCreate long term competitive advantage through a self-
sustaining culture based on individual accountability for
making choices consistent with our Mission Statement
and core values and shared responsibility to insist on similar
dExhibit outstanding citizenship through deep involvement
in the overall betterment of the communities in which we live
behavior from each other;
and work.
dDemonstrate constant innovation through which we challenge
our views of the world, seeking out and adopting new ideas,
new concepts, and new tools to keep pace with the ever
changing reality of our world;
As we look to the year ahead, many obstacles remain in our path.
In the larger context, worldwide growth continues to slow with
particularly troublesome on-going social, economic, and political
issues in the extended Eurozone. Domestic uncertainty also
dEstablish exceptional customer care in which we make a
remains a concern. Government budget battles are left largely
promise and keep that promise…every day, every customer,
unresolved with the potential for negative impacts across a
every time;
dBuild an overall operating system based on integrated
value streams that deliver quality products and services
quickly, reliably, and at a cost that offers compelling value
in the market place;
wide variety of services and programs including Medicare and
Social Security. Credit availability on Main Street is still restricted.
Most of all, the overriding challenge of both unemployment
and underemployment hangs around the neck of a recovery like
an albatross. Consumer confidence remains largely stuck.
dOffer solutions when and where required through the practi-
Despite these macro concerns, we enter fiscal 2014 cautiously
cal application of technology; and
optimistic about our industry and prospects for continued
8
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
movement upwards, back towards normal levels of activity.
recession, we must recapture returns on capital that justify
We anticipate another double digit increase in revenue driven
continued reinvestment in the business and that support the
primarily by new construction demand. While remodeling is
creation of value for you, our Shareholders.
likely to remain relatively weak, we expect to generate growth
in the channel as our dealer business adds incremental busi-
ness on top of stable big box demand.
None of what we have accomplished, or will accomplish, would
be possible without the men and women of our Company.
Their attitude and commitment, even in the most trying of
Cost control will undoubtedly be a challenge all year. While easing,
circumstances, is a reflection of their outstanding character.
promotional activity is likely to remain elevated by historical stan-
They have earned my ultimate respect for their achievements.
dards in a highly competitive remodel market. Raw material infla-
There are things from time to time that keep me awake at
tion has begun to impact critical inputs and we will need to find
night. The organization is not one of them. I know that these
both internal offsets and, ultimately, to secure price increases from
fine individuals will always answer the call. I offer them my
the consumer as this trend continues. The rate of new construc-
sincerest appreciation.
tion growth will continue to put pressure on operations as we add
resources in an environment constrained by an absence of skilled
labor. Despite these and other cost pressures, we expect to gener-
ate leverage on incremental volume and improve profitability.
As gratifying as fiscal 2013 was in terms of improving perform-
On behalf of the Board of Directors, the Leadership Team, and
the entire Company, we thank you for your continuing support.
ance, our work is not done. Simply returning to profitability is
not enough. As the market recovers from the long housing
Kent B. Guichard
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
10
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
FIVE-YEAR SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(in millions, except per share data)
FINANCIAL STATEMENT DATA
Net sales
Operating income (loss)
Net income (loss)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic
Diluted
Depreciation and amortization expense
Total assets
Long-term debt, less current maturities
Total shareholders’ equity
Cash dividends declared per share
Average shares outstanding
Basic
Diluted
PERCENT OF SALES
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Income (loss) before income taxes
Net income (loss)
RATIO ANALYSIS
Current ratio
Inventory turnover3
Collection period—days4
Percentage of capital (long-term debt plus equity):
Long-term debt, less current maturities
Equity
Return on equity (average %)
20131
$630.4
17.2
9.8
0.67
0.66
14.4
294.0
23.6
146.2
0.00
14.6
14.8
16.3%
13.5
2.7
1.5
2.6
20.4
31.4
13.9%
86.1
7.1
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
20112
20121,2
20102
$515.8
(33.4)
(20.8)
(1.45)
(1.45)
23.4
265.1
23.8
130.0
0.09
14.3
14.3
12.9%
16.2
(6.4)
(4.0)
2.2
19.2
30.0
15.5%
84.5
(14.6)
$452.6
(31.1)
(20.0)
(1.40)
(1.40)
26.7
268.4
24.7
154.0
0.36
14.3
14.3
11.7%
18.5
(6.6)
(4.4)
2.4
16.1
30.1
13.8%
86.2
(12.2)
$ 406.5
(37.3)
(22.3)
(1.58)
(1.58)
30.9
282.4
25.6
175.3
0.36
14.1
14.1
12.0%
20.5
(9.1)
(5.5)
2.5
12.3
32.9
12.7%
87.3
(11.8)
20092
$545.9
(7.2)
(3.2)
(0.23)
(0.23)
35.1
303.7
26.5
203.7
0.36
14.1
14.1
16.4%
15.9
(1.1)
(0.6)
2.6
11.5
33.5
11.5%
88.5
(1.5)
1 The Company announced plans to realign its manufacturing network during fiscal 2012. The impact of these initiatives in fiscal 2012 increased operat-
ing loss, net loss and loss per share by $15,917,000, $9,710,000 and $0.68, respectively. During fiscal 2013, the charges related to these initiatives
decreased operating income, net income and earnings per share by $1,433,000, $874,000 and $0.06, respectively.
2 The Company performed a reduction-in-force of salaried personnel and announced plans to realign its manufacturing network during fiscal 2009.
The impact of these initiatives in fiscal 2009 reduced operating income (loss), net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share by $9,743,000, $6,050,000
and $0.43, respectively. During fiscal 2010, these initiatives increased operating loss, net loss and loss per share by $2,808,000, $1,722,000 and $0.12,
respectively. During fiscal 2011, these initiatives increased operating loss, net loss and loss per share by $62,000, $39,000 and $0.00, respectively. During
fiscal 2012, these initiatives increased operating loss, net loss and loss per share by $404,000, $246,000 and $0.01, respectively.
3 Based on the average of beginning and ending inventory.
4 Based on the ratio of average monthly customer receivables to average sales per day.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 11
financial review 2013
management’s
discussion and analysis
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth certain income and expense items as a percentage of net sales:
Net sales
Cost of sales and distribution
Gross profit
Selling and marketing expenses
General and administrative expenses
Restructuring charges
Insurance recovery
Operating income (loss)
Interest expense/other (income) expense
Income (loss) before income taxes
Income tax expense (benefit)
Net income (loss)
2013
100.0%
83.7
16.3
9.1
4.4
0.2
(0.1)
2.7
0.1
2.7
1.1
1.5
PERCENTAGE OF NET SALES
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
2012
100.0%
87.1
12.9
11.3
4.9
3.2
0.0
(6.5)
(0.1)
(6.4)
(2.4)
(4.0)
2011
100.0%
88.3
11.7
13.5
5.0
0.0
0.0
(6.8)
(0.2)
(6.6)
(2.2)
(4.4)
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Five-Year Selected Financial Information and the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes contained elsewhere herein.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report contains statements concerning the Com-
pany’s expectations, plans, objectives, future financial perform-
ance and other statements that are not historical facts. These
statements are “forward-looking statements” within the mean-
ing of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
In most cases, the reader can identify these forward-looking
statements by words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,”
“expect,” “believe,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “may,” or
other similar words. Forward-looking statements contained in
this annual report, including in Management’s Discussion and
Analysis, are based on current expectations and our actual
results may differ materially from those projected in any forward-
looking statements. In addition, the Company participates in an
industry that is subject to rapidly changing conditions and there
are numerous factors that could cause the Company to experience
a decline in sales and/or earnings or deterioration in financial
condition. These include but are not limited to: (1) general
economic or business conditions and instability in the financial
and credit markets, including their potential impact on our
(i) sales and operating costs and access to financing, and
(ii) customers and suppliers and their ability to obtain financing
or generate the cash necessary to conduct their respective busi-
nesses; (2) the cyclical nature of the Company’s industry, which
is particularly sensitive to changes in consumer confidence,
the amount of consumers’ income available for discretionary
purchases, and the availability and terms of consumer credit;
(3) economic weakness in a specific channel of distribution;
12
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
(4) the loss of sales from specific customers due to their loss
During the Company’s fiscal year that ended on April 30, 2013
of market share, bankruptcy or switching to a competitor;
(fiscal 2013), the Company experienced improving housing
(5) risks associated with domestic manufacturing operations,
market conditions for the first time since the housing market
including fluctuations in capacity utilization and the prices
downturn that began in 2007.
and availability of key raw materials as well as fuel, transpor -
tation, warehousing and labor costs and environmental compli-
ance and remediation costs; (6) the need to respond to price
A number of positive factors evidenced the improving housing
market, including:
or product initiatives launched by a competitor; (7) the Com-
dCreation of approximately 2 million private sector jobs
pany’s ability to successfully implement initiatives related
in the U.S. during the Company’s fiscal years 2012 and 2013
to increasing market share, new products, main taining and
(according to the U.S. Department of Labor);
increasing its sales force and new product displays; and
(8) sales growth at a rate that outpaces the Company’s ability
to install new capacity or a sales decline that requires reduc -
tion or realignment of the Company’s manufacturing capacity.
Additional information concerning the factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking
statements is contained in this annual report, including elsewhere
in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” and also in the
Company’s most recent annual report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended April 30, 2013, filed with the U.S. Securities
dA 15% improvement in Gross Private Residential Fixed Invest-
ment reported by the U.S. Department of Commerce during
the most recent four quarters through the first quarter of cal-
endar 2013, as compared with the same period one year ago;
dIncreases in total housing starts and single family housing
starts during the Company’s fiscal 2013 of 32% and 28%,
respectively, as compared to the Company’s fiscal 2012,
according to the U.S. Department of Commerce;
dThe median price of existing homes sold in the U.S. improved
and Exchange Commission (SEC), including under Item 1A, “Risk
for the first time in 7 years, rising by 10% during the Company’s
Factors”, and Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
fiscal 2013, according to data provided by the National Associ-
about Market Risk”. While the Company believes that these
ation of Realtors;
risks are manageable and will not adversely impact the long-
dConsumer confidence, as reported by the University of
term performance of the Company, these risks could, under
certain circumstances, have a material adverse impact on its
operating results and financial condition.
Michigan, averaged 10% higher during the Company’s fis-
cal 2013 than in its prior fiscal year; and
dCabinet sales, as reported by members of the Kitchen Cabinet
Any forward-looking statement that the Company makes speaks
Manufacturers Association (KCMA), increased by 11% during
only as of the date of this annual report. The Company undertakes
fiscal 2013, suggesting an increase in both new construction
no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
and remodeling sales of cabinets.
statements or cautionary factors, as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
OVERVIEW
American Woodmark Corporation manufactures and distributes
kitchen cabinets and vanities for the remodeling and new
home construction markets. Its products are sold on a national
basis directly to home centers, major builders and home manu-
facturers and through a network of independent dealers and
distributors. At April 30, 2013, the Company operated 9 manu-
facturing facilities and 9 service centers across the country.
Faced with an improving but still relatively subdued remodeling
market, the Company’s largest remodeling customers and com-
petitors continued to utilize an elevated level of sales promo-
tions in the Company’s product category during fiscal 2013
to boost sales, although a noticeable easing occurred in the
second half of fiscal 2013. The Company strives to maintain
its promotional levels in line with market activity, with a goal
of remaining competitive. The Company experienced promo-
tional levels during fiscal 2013 that were lower than those
experienced in its prior fiscal year. The Company’s remodeling
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 13
sales increased at a high-single digit pace during fiscal 2013
The Company regularly considers the need for a valuation
in a remodeling market that appears to have improved by a bit
allowance against its deferred tax assets. The Company
less than that level.
The Company increased its net sales by 22% during fiscal 2013. The
Company realized strong sales gains in its new construction channel
during fiscal 2013, where sales increased by more than 40%, signif-
icantly outpacing the improvement in single-family housing starts.
Management believes this result, combined with the Com-
pany’s increased remodeling sales, indicates the Company realized
market share gains in both of its sales channels during fiscal 2013.
had a history of profitable operations for 16 consecutive years,
from 1994 to 2009, followed by losses that coincided with the
industry downturn from 2010 to 2012. As of April 30, 2013,
the Company had total deferred tax assets of $38.7 million,
down from $42.1 million at April 30, 2012. Growth in the Com-
pany’s deferred tax assets in recent fiscal years resulted primarily
from growth in its defined benefit pension liabilities and the
impact of its recent losses prior to fiscal 2013. The Company
earned sufficient net income during fiscal 2013 to fully utilize
During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company announced
its Federal net operating loss carryforward. To fully realize
several initiatives designed to reduce its cost base (the 2012
Restructuring), including the permanent closure of two manu-
facturing plants, the decision to sell a previously closed manu-
these net deferred tax assets, the Company will need to, among
other things, substantially reduce its net unfunded pension
obligation of $53.7 million at April 30, 2013. The Company took
facturing facility, and the realignment of its retirement program,
definitive actions when it froze its pension plans as part
including the freezing of its pension plans. All of these initia-
of the 2012 Restructuring to enhance the probability that this
tives were completed either prior to or just after the beginning
objective is achieved in the future.
of the Company’s fiscal 2013, and restructuring charges related
to these actions have been reflected in the Company’s results
during both years.
Gross margin for fiscal 2013 was 16.3%, significantly improved
from 12.9% in fiscal 2012. The increase in the Company’s gross
margin rate was driven by reductions in the labor and overhead
costs associated with the Company’s restructuring activities,
the beneficial impact of increased sales volume and the
absence of the prior year’s inventory write down, which more
than offset the impact of rising materials costs.
The Company recorded restructuring charges of $15.9 million
(pre-tax) and $10.0 million (after-tax) during fiscal 2012 and
$1.4 million (pre-tax) and $0.9 million (after-tax) during fis-
cal 2013 in connection with these initiatives. Because the bulk
of these restructuring efforts have been completed, the Com-
pany expects that its future out-of-pocket costs will be nominal.
The Company sold a previously closed plant during fiscal 2013
and continues to include in “Other Assets” at an aggregate
$2.7 million book value the other two plants held for sale that
were included in the 2012 Restructuring.
The Company resumed the funding of its pension plans during
fiscal year 2012, and expects to continue funding these plans
for the foreseeable future, which will reduce both its unfunded
pension plan obligation and its deferred tax asset. These
actions, coupled with the recent improvement in the U.S. housing
market and the Company’s continued ability to grow its sales
at a faster rate than its competitors, have enabled the Company
to generate net income and reduce its deferred tax assets and
unfunded pension obligation during fiscal 2013. The Company
believes that the positive evidence of the housing industry
improvement, coupled with the benefits from the Company’s
successful restructuring and continued market share gains have
already driven a return to profitability that is expected to con-
tinue, and that the combined impact of these positive factors
outweighs the negative factor of the Company’s previous
losses. Accordingly, Management has concluded it is more likely
than not that the Company will realize its deferred tax assets.
The Company also regularly assesses its long-lived assets
to determine if any impairment has occurred. The Company
has concluded that none of the long-lived assets pertaining
to its 9 manufacturing plants or any of its other long-lived
assets were impaired as of April 30, 2013.
14
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands)
Net sales
Gross profit
Selling and marketing expenses
General and administrative expenses
Interest expense
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
2013 VS. 2012
2012 VS. 2011
2013
2012
2011
PERCENT CHANGE PERCENT CHANGE
$ 630,437
102,656
57,402
27,575
643
$515,814
66,475
58,271
25,329
527
$ 452,589
52,751
61,034
22,709
572
22%
54
(1)
9
22
14%
26
(5)
12
(8)
NET SALES
Net sales were $630.4 million in fiscal 2013, an increase of
$114.6 million, or 22%, compared with fiscal 2012. Overall unit vol-
ume for fiscal 2013 was 17% higher than in fiscal 2012, which man-
driven primarily by inflationary pressures in finishing materials,
lumber, cartons, plywood, particleboard and paint, as well as
from increased levels of outsourcing following the recent plant
closures; and
agement believes was driven primarily by the Company’s increased
d Sales promotion costs improved by 1.4% of net sales during
market share. Average revenue per unit increased 4% in fis-
fiscal 2013 compared with the prior year, as a result of both
cal 2013, driven by improvements in the Company’s product mix.
an increased proportion of new construction sales to the
Net sales for fiscal 2012 increased 14% to $515.8 million from
$452.6 million in fiscal 2011. Overall unit volume for fiscal 2012
was 9% higher than in fiscal 2011, which management believes
was driven primarily by the Company’s increased market share.
Average revenue per unit increased 5% during fiscal 2012,
driven primarily by improvements in product mix.
GROSS PROFIT
Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased to 16.3% in fis-
Company’s total sales and reduced promotional activity.
Sales promotions that involved the use of free products or
cash reimbursements back to the Company’s large remodeling
customers were deducted from gross margin as opposed
to being classified as operating expenses.
During fiscal 2012, the Company’s gross profit increased as
a percentage of net sales to 12.9% from 11.7% in fiscal 2011.
Increased sales volume in fiscal 2012 created improved labor
efficiencies and more favorable absorption of manufacturing
cal 2013 as compared with 12.9% in fiscal 2012. The improvement
overhead costs, which were partially offset by increased
in gross profit margin was due primarily to the beneficial impact of
sales promotion costs, material costs and diesel fuel. Specific
higher sales volume and labor and overhead cost savings asso-
changes and additional information included:
ciated with the Company’s two plant closures in April and May of
2012. This favorability was partially offset by an increase in mate-
rial costs. Specific changes and additional information included:
dLabor and overhead costs improved by 3.6% as a percentage
of net sales compared with the prior fiscal year, as the combi-
nation of the increased sales volume and the plant closures
caused both a decrease in overhead costs and improved
absorption of fixed overhead costs, while labor costs became
increasingly more efficient throughout fiscal 2013 as
d Labor and overhead costs improved by 3.7% as a percentage
of net sales during fiscal 2012 compared with the prior fiscal
year, as increased sales volume caused increased productiv-
ity of direct labor and absorption of fixed overhead costs;
d Materials and freight costs increased as a percentage of net
sales by 1.8% during fiscal 2012 as compared with fiscal 2011,
driven primarily by inflationary pressures in finishing materials,
lumber, cartons, imported components, and diesel fuel; and
productivity gains were realized following the plant closures;
d Sales promotion costs increased by 0.7% of net sales during
d Materials and freight costs increased as a percentage of net
sales by 1.6% during fiscal 2013 as compared with fiscal 2012,
fiscal 2012, as the Company chose to remain competitive with
competitors’ promotional offerings to drive sales growth in a
challenging market.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 15
SELLING AND MARKETING EXPENSES
Selling and marketing expenses in fiscal 2013 were 9.1% of net
OUTLOOK FOR FISCAL 2014
The Company tracks several metrics, including but not limited
sales, compared with 11.3% of net sales in fiscal 2012. Selling and
to housing starts, existing home sales, mortgage interest
marketing costs decreased by 1% despite a 22% increase in net
rates, new jobs growth, GDP growth and consumer confidence,
sales. The improvement in sales and marketing costs in relation
which it believes are leading indicators of overall demand
to net sales was due to reduced spending on product launch costs
for kitchen and bath cabinetry. The Company believes that
and cost reductions related to the Company’s retirement plan
housing prices finally bottomed during its fiscal 2012 and
changes, which were offset in part by increased sales compensation
have begun what it expects will be a multi-year improvement,
and staffing costs related to the Company’s increased sales levels.
driven by employment growth and a resumption of growth
Selling and marketing expenses were 11.3% of net sales
in fiscal 2012 compared with 13.5% in fiscal 2011. Cost savings
from lower marketing collateral and branding costs, as well
as reductions in product display costs more than offset the
increases in employee compensation and travel costs incurred
by the Company in fiscal 2012.
GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES
General and administrative expenses increased by $2.2 million
or 9% during fiscal 2013. The increase in cost was entirely
related to increased pay-for-performance compensation. How-
ever, G&A costs declined to 4.4% of net sales in fiscal 2013
compared with 4.9% of net sales in fiscal 2012.
General and administrative expenses in fiscal 2012 increased
by $2.6 million, or 12%, compared with fiscal 2011 and repre-
sented 4.9% of net sales, compared with 5.0% of net sales
for fiscal 2011. The majority of the cost increase was related
to increased pay-for-performance compensation.
EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATES
The Company generated pre-tax income of $16.7 million
during fiscal 2013, including $1.4 million of restructuring
charges. The Company’s effective tax rate increased from
37.6% in fiscal 2012 to 41.7% in fiscal 2013. The higher
effective tax rate was the result of relatively consistent
amounts of permanent tax differences in relation to the
net income generated in fiscal 2013 compared with the
net loss generated in the prior year.
in new household formation. However, because the number
of homeowners still owing more than what their homes are
worth remains at historically high levels, the Company expects
that while the cabinet remodeling market will show modest
improvement it will continue to be well below the historic
highs reached in the previous decade.
Driven by an improving housing market, the Company expects
that industry-wide cabinet remodeling sales will continue
a trend that began during fiscal 2013 and improve at roughly
a mid-single digit rate during its fiscal 2014. The Company
expects that its home center market share will be relatively
stable in fiscal 2014 and it will continue to gain market share
in its growing dealer business. This combination is expected
to result in remodeling sales growth that outpaces the market
by several percentage points.
The Company agrees with the consensus estimate that new
construction starts will continue to grow at a mid-20% rate
during its fiscal 2014. The Company’s new construction sales
growth outperformed the new construction market by approxi-
mately 20 points during fiscal 2013, and expects that it will
again outperform the new construction market during fiscal
2014 but by a significantly lesser rate, as its comparable prior
year sales levels become more challenging.
Inclusive of the potential for modest sales mix and pricing
improvements, the Company expects that it will grow its total
sales at a mid-teen rate in fiscal 2014. The Company experi-
enced production inefficiencies during the first half of its fiscal
2013 driven by the combination of work transition issues from
its closed plants, coupled with production volume increases that
were driven by unexpectedly high sales levels. These issues were
resolved during the third quarter of the Company’s fiscal 2013,
16
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
enabling the Company’s gross margin rate to improve in the
impairments related to the 2012 Restructuring. This improvement
fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. The Company expects that its gross
was offset in part by a $13.6 million net working capital invest-
margin rate and net income for fiscal 2014 will improve com-
ment in its operating assets and liabilities to fund growth and
pared with its fiscal 2013 performance.
increased contributions to its pension plans of $2.0 million.
The Company had gross outlays for capital expenditures and
Cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2012 was
customer display units of $13.5 million during fiscal 2013, and
$16.1 million, compared with $13.2 million in fiscal 2011.
plans to increase this spending level modestly during fiscal 2014.
The $2.9 million improvement was primarily attributable
However, the Company is undertaking a multi-year review of
to the reduction in the Company’s operating loss exclusive
its manufacturing capacity and capital expenditure plans which
of restructuring charges of $13.9 million. This improvement
could cause its capital expenditures to exceed this level.
was offset in part by reductions in proceeds from income tax
Additional risks and uncertainties that could affect the
Company’s results of operations and financial condition are
discussed elsewhere in this annual report, including under
“Forward-Looking Statements,” and elsewhere in “Manage-
ment’s Discussion and Analysis,” as well as in the Company’s
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30,
2013 filed with the SEC, including under Item 1A, “Risk Factors”
and Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk.”
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company’s cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash totaled
$97.0 million at April 30, 2013, which represented an increase
of $23.3 million from April 30, 2012. Total debt was $24.7 million
at April 30, 2013, virtually unchanged from the prior fiscal year
refunds of $7.1 million, from increasing funding to its pension
plans of $2.9 million, and from funding restructuring costs
of $1.2 million.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
The Company’s investing activities primarily consist of capital
expenditures and investments in promotional displays. Net
cash used by investing activities in fiscal 2013 was $6.1 million,
compared with $9.9 million in fiscal 2012 and $5.5 million
in fiscal 2011. Investments in property, plant and equipment
for fiscal 2013 were $8.9 million, compared with $6.7 million
in fiscal 2012 and $5.0 million in fiscal 2011. Investments
in promotional displays were $4.8 million in fiscal 2013, com-
pared with $3.3 million in fiscal 2012 and $3.5 million in fis-
cal 2011. The increased level of investment during fiscal 2013
primarily represents machinery and equipment enhancements
and long-term debt, excluding current maturities, to capital was
to enable production volume to increase and an increase in the
13.9% at April 30, 2013, down from 15.5% at April 30, 2012.
number of display units deployed with customers.
The Company’s main source of liquidity is its cash and cash
equivalents on hand and cash generated from its operating
activities. During fiscal 2013 the Company renegotiated its
revolving credit agreement with its primary lender and is no
longer required to hold restricted cash to secure borrowings
under that agreement.
During fiscal 2013, the Company’s reduced net cash used for
investing activities was driven by the receipt of $6.4 million
in proceeds from the sales of assets from closed plants and
insurance proceeds of $1.0 million, which more than offset the
aggregate $3.6 million increase in outflows for capital expendi-
tures and promotional displays.
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2013 was $24.5 mil-
lion, compared with $16.1 million in fiscal 2012. The $8.4 million
improvement was primarily attributable to the Company’s
$22.9 million improvement in net income and reduction in asset
The Company generated positive free cash flow (defined as
cash provided by operating activities less cash used for invest-
ing activities) of $18.4 million during fiscal 2013, compared
with $6.1 million in fiscal 2012 and $7.7 million in fiscal 2011.
The increase in fiscal 2013 was driven by the net improve-
ments in both cash provided by operating activities and
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 17
decreased net outflows used for investing activities. The reduc-
outstanding indebtedness and other obligations to Wells Fargo
tion in fiscal 2012 was driven by increased net outflows used
be secured by cash and securities held in certain of the Com-
for investing activities that more than offset net improvements
pany’s accounts with Wells Fargo. The Company’s outstanding
in cash provided by operating activities.
indebtedness and other obligations to Wells Fargo are secured
by substantially all of the Company’s assets. The Company can
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
The Company realized a net inflow of $11.9 million from financ-
borrow under the revolving credit facility up to the lesser of
$35 million or the maximum borrowing base (which equals
ing activities in fiscal 2013, compared with a $5.1 million inflow
75% of eligible accounts receivable, 50% of eligible pre bill
in fiscal 2012, and a net outflow of $5.5 million in fiscal 2011.
reserves and up to $20 million for equipment value, each as
Reductions in the amount of restricted cash drove inflows
defined in the agreement) less any outstanding loan balance.
of approximately $7 million in both fiscal 2013 and 2012.
Any outstanding loan balance bears interest at the London
Additional proceeds of $5.9 million were generated during
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) (0.25% at April 30, 2013) plus
fiscal 2013 from the exercise of stock options. Approximately
2.625%. Under the terms of the revolving credit facility, the
$1 million was used to repay long-term debt in each of the
Company must: (1) maintain at the end of each fiscal quarter
years in the three-year period ended in fiscal 2013, while fis-
a ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth of not greater
cal 2012 and 2011 was further impacted by dividend payments
than 1.4 to 1.0; (2) maintain at the end of each fiscal quarter
to shareholders of $1.3 million and $5.1 million, respectively.
a ratio of cash flow to fixed charges of not less than 1.25 to 1.0
The Company elected to suspend its quarterly dividend during
fiscal 2012. The Company ended fiscal 2013 with a record level
of nearly $97 million in cash and cash equivalents. The Company
is authorized to repurchase up to $93.3 million of its stock under
an authorization approved by its Board of Directors in 2007.
measured on a rolling four-quarter basis; (3) maintain at least
$1.00 in net income for the fiscal quarter ending April 30, 2013
and at least $1.00 in net income on a rolling four-quarter basis
for the fiscal quarter ending July 31, 2013; and comply with other
customary affirmative and negative covenants.
The Company continues to evaluate its cash on hand and
The Company was in compliance with all covenants specified
prospects for future cash generation, and compare these against
in the amended credit facility as of April 30, 2013, as follows:
its go-forward reinvestment plans for future capital expenditures.
(1) the Company’s ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth at
Although the evaluation of its future capital expenditures is
April 30, 2013 was 1.0 to 1.0; (2) cash flow to fixed charges for its
ongoing, the Company expects that it will make repurchases
most recent four quarters was 2.72 to 1.0; and (3) its net income
of its common stock from time to time during fiscal 2014.
for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2013 was $5.2 million.
The Company can borrow up to $35 million under the Wells Fargo
The revolving credit facility does not limit the Company’s ability
credit facility, subject to a maximum borrowing base equal to
to pay dividends or repurchase its common stock as long as
75% of eligible accounts receivable, 50% of eligible pre bill reserves
the Company is in compliance with these covenants.
and up to $20 million for equipment value (each as defined in the
agreement). At April 30, 2013, $10 million of loans and $3.7 million
of letters of credit were outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility.
Cash flow from operations combined with accumulated cash
and cash equivalents on hand are expected to be more than
sufficient to support forecasted working capital requirements,
An amendment to the revolving credit facility and modifica-
service existing debt obligations and fund capital expenditures
tions to related security arrangements completed on March 18,
for fiscal 2014.
2013 eliminated the requirement that 50% of the Company’s
18
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
The timing of the Company’s contractual obligations as of April 30, 2013 is summarized in the table below:
(in thousands)
Revolving credit facility
Economic development loans
Term loans
Capital lease obligations
Interest on long-term debt1
Operating lease obligations
Pension contributions2
Total
TOTAL
AMOUNTS
$ 10,000
3,480
3,530
7,739
2,622
10,926
33,208
$ 71,505
2014
$ —
—
349
806
659
3,411
2,258
$ 7,483
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
2015–2016
2017–2018
2019 AND
THEREAFTER
$10,000
—
763
1,689
1,113
5,870
10,020
$ 29,455
$
—
—
2,418
1,356
488
1,553
15,700
$
—
3,480
—
3,888
362
92
5,230
$ 21,515
$ 13,052
1 Interest commitments under interest bearing debt consist of interest under the Company’s primary loan agreement, term loans and capitalized lease
agreements. Amounts outstanding under the Company’s revolving credit facility, $10 million at April 30, 2013, bear a variable interest rate determined
by the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.625%. Interest under the Company’s term loans and capitalized lease agreements is fixed
at rates between 2% and 6.5%. Interest commitments under interest bearing debt for the Company’s revolving credit facility are at LIBOR plus
the spread as of April 30, 2013, throughout the remaining term of the facility.
2 The estimated cost of the Company’s two defined benefit pension plans is determined annually based upon the discount rate and other assumptions
at fiscal year end. Future pension funding contributions beyond fiscal 2019 have not been determined at this time.
MARKET RISKS
The Company’s business has historically been subjected
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management has chosen accounting policies that are necessary
to seasonal influences, with higher sales typically realized
to give reasonable assurance that the Company’s operational
in the second and fourth fiscal quarters.
results and financial position are accurately and fairly reported.
The costs of the Company’s products are subject to inflationary
pressures and commodity price fluctuations. The Company has
generally been able, over time, to recover the effects of inflation
and commodity price fluctuations through sales price increases.
On April 30, 2013, the Company had no material exposure
to changes in interest rates for its debt agreements.
The significant accounting policies of the Company are disclosed
in Note A to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
in this annual report. The following discussion addresses the
accounting policies that management believes have the greatest
potential impact on the presentation of the financial condition
and operating results of the Company for the periods being
reported and that require the most judgment.
The Company does not currently use commodity or interest
rate derivatives or similar financial instruments to manage
Management regularly reviews these critical accounting policies
and estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
its commodity price or interest rate risks.
For additional discussion of risks that could affect the Com-
pany and its business, see “Forward-Looking Statements”
LONG-LIVED ASSET IMPAIRMENT. The Company reviews its
long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may
above and “Risk Factors” in the Company’s most recent annual
not be recoverable. For purposes of assessing if impairment
report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As of April 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had no off-balance
sheet arrangements.
exists, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are
identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash
flows of other groups of assets. To determine whether an impair-
ment has occurred, the Company compares estimates of the
future undiscounted net cash flows of groups of assets to their
carrying values. The Company has not recognized impairments
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 19
of long-lived assets in the last three years other than the impair-
The estimated expense, benefits and pension obligations of
ments related to restructuring activities.
these plans are determined using various assumptions. The most
REVENUE RECOGNITION. The Company utilizes signed sales
agreements that provide for transfer of title to the customer upon
delivery. The Company must estimate the amount of sales that
have been transferred to third-party carriers but not delivered
to customers. The estimate is calculated using a lag factor deter-
mined by analyzing the actual difference between shipment date
and delivery date of orders over the past 12 months. Revenue is
only recognized on those shipments which the Company believes
have been delivered to the customer.
The Company recognizes revenue based on the invoice price less
allowances for sales returns, cash discounts and other deductions
as required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
significant assumptions are the long-term expected rate of return
on plan assets and the discount rate used to determine the pres-
ent value of the pension obligations. In fiscal 2013 and 2012, the
Company determined the discount rate by referencing the Aon
Hewitt AA Bond Universe Yield Curve. In fiscal 2011, the Company
referred to the Hewitt Above Median Yield Curve in establishing
the discount rate. This change was caused by the merger of
Aon and Hewitt and the corresponding elimination of the Hewitt
Above Median Yield Curve. The Company believes that using
a yield curve approach accurately reflects changes in the present
value of liabilities over time since each cash flow is discounted
at the rate at which it could effectively be settled. The long-term
expected rate of return on plan assets reflects the current mix
(GAAP). Collection is reasonably assured as determined through
of the plan assets invested in equities and bonds.
an analysis of accounts receivable data, including historical prod-
uct returns and the evaluation of each customer’s ability to pay.
Allowances for sales returns are based on the historical relation-
ship between shipments and returns. The Company believes that
its historical experience is an accurate reflection of future returns.
SELF INSURANCE. The Company is self-insured for certain
costs related to employee medical coverage and workers’ com-
pensation liability. The Company maintains stop-loss coverage
with third-party insurers to limit total exposure. The Company
The following is a summary of the potential impact of a hypo-
thetical 1% change in actuarial assumptions for the discount
rate, expected return on plan assets and consumer price index:
(in millions)
(decrease) increase
IMPACT OF 1% IMPACT OF 1%
INCREASE
DECREASE
Effect on annual pension expense
$ (1.1)
Effect on projected pension
benefit obligation
$ (21.1)
$ 1.1
$26.9
establishes a liability at each balance sheet date based on esti-
Pension expense for fiscal 2013 and the assumptions used in that
mates for a variety of factors that influence the Company’s ulti-
calculation are presented in Note H of the Consolidated Financial
mate cost. In the event that actual experience is substantially
Statements. At April 30, 2013, the discount rate was 4.21% com-
different from the estimates, the financial results for the period
pared with 4.66% at April 30, 2012. The expected return on plan
could be adversely affected. The Company believes that the
assets was 7.5% at both April 30, 2013 and April 30, 2012. The
methodologies used to estimate all factors related to employee
assumed rate of increase in compensation levels was 4.0% for
medical coverage and workers’ compensation are an accurate
the fiscal years ended April 30, 2012 and 2011. The rate of compen-
reflection of the liability as of the date of the balance sheet.
sation increase is not applicable for periods beyond April 30, 2012
PENSIONS. The Company has two non-contributory defined
benefit pension plans covering many of the Company’s employ-
ees hired prior to April 30, 2012.
Effective April 30, 2012, the Company froze all future benefit
accruals under the Company’s hourly and salary defined
benefit pension plans.
because the Company froze its pension plans as of that date.
The projected performance of the Company’s pension plans is
largely dependent on the assumptions used to measure the obli-
gations of the plans and to estimate future performance of the
plans’ invested assets. Over the past two measurement periods,
the most material deviations between results based on assump-
tions and the actual plan performance have resulted from
changes to the discount rate used to measure the plans’ benefit
20
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
obligations and the actual return on plan assets. Accounting
guidelines require the discount rate to be set to market at each
PRODUCT WARRANTY. The Company estimates outstanding
warranty costs based on the historical relationship between
annual measurement date. From the fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012
warranty claims and revenues. The warranty accrual is reviewed
measurement dates, the discount rate decreased from 5.66%
monthly to verify that it properly reflects the Company’s remaining
at April 30, 2011 to 4.66% at April 30, 2012, which caused an
obligation based on anticipated expenditures over the balance
actuarial loss of $26.3 million. From the fiscal 2012 to fiscal 2013
of the obligation period. Adjustments are made when actual war-
measurement dates, the discount rate decreased from 4.66%
ranty claim experience differs from estimates. Warranty claims are
to 4.21% which caused an actuarial loss of $10.8 million.
generally made within two months of the original shipment date.
The Company strives to balance expected long-term returns and
short-term volatility of pension plan assets. Favorable and unfa-
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE. The calculation
of stock-based compensation expense involves estimates that
vorable differences between the assumed and actual returns on
require management’s judgment. These estimates include the
plan assets are generally amortized over a period no longer than
fair value of each stock option and restricted stock unit award
the average life expectancy of the plans’ active participants. The
granted. Stock option awards are estimated on the date of grant
actual rates of return on plan assets realized, net of investment
using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. There are two signifi-
manager fees, were 10.2%, 3.1% and 11.9% for fiscal 2013, 2012
cant inputs into the Black-Scholes option pricing model: expected
and 2011, respectively.
The fair value of plan assets at April 30, 2013 was $95.7 million
compared with $85.7 million at April 30, 2012. The Company’s
projected benefit obligation exceeded plan assets by $53.7 mil-
lion in fiscal 2013 and by $50.5 million in fiscal 2012. The $3.2 mil-
lion increase in the Company’s net under-funded position during
fiscal 2013 was primarily driven by the Company’s $10.8 million
volatility and expected term. The Company estimates expected
volatility based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock
over a term equal to the expected term of the option granted.
The expected term of stock option awards granted is derived from
historical exercise experience under the Company’s stock option
plans and represents the period of time that stock option awards
granted are expected to be outstanding.
actuarial losses, offset in part by a higher return on plan assets
For performance-based restricted stock units, the Company
and Company contributions. The Company expects its pension
estimates the number of shares that will be granted upon
expense to decrease from $0.6 million in fiscal 2013 to $0.2 mil-
satisfaction of the performance conditions, based upon actual
lion in fiscal 2014, due primarily to a higher expected return on
and expected future operating results. The assumptions used
plan assets. The Company expects to contribute $2.3 million to
in calculating the fair value of stock-based payment awards repre-
its pension plans in fiscal 2014, which represents required fund-
sent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve
ing. The Company made contributions of $4.9 million to its pen-
inherent uncertainties and the application of significant manage-
sion plans in fiscal 2013.
PROMOTIONAL DISPLAYS. The Company invests in promotional
displays in retail stores to demonstrate product features, product
and quality specifications and serve as a training tool for design-
ers. The investment is carried at cost less applicable amortization.
Amortization is provided by the straight-line method on an indi-
vidual display basis over the estimated period of economic bene-
fit, approximately 30 to 36 months. The Company believes that
the estimated period of economic benefit provides an accurate
reflection of the value of displays as of the date of the balance
sheet based on historical experience.
ment judgment. As a result, if factors change or the Company
uses different assumptions, stock-based compensation expense
could be materially different in the future. In addition, the
Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and
only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. If the
Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from
its estimate, the stock-based compensation expense could be
significantly different from what the Company has recorded
in the current period. See Note G to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for further discussion on stock-based compensation.
VALUATION OF DEFERRED TAX ASSETS. The Company regularly
considers the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 21
tax assets. Based upon the Company’s analysis at April 30, 2013
statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but
and 2012, the Company determined in each case that a valuation
consecutive statements. Additionally, ASU 2011-05 eliminates
allowance was not required. The Company considered all available
the option to present comprehensive income and its compo-
evidence, both positive and negative, in determining the need
nents as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity. The
for a valuation allowance. Based upon this analysis, management
ASU does not change the items that must be reported in other
determined that it is more likely than not that the Company’s
comprehensive income. The Company adopted this guidance
deferred tax assets will be realized through expected future income
effective May 1, 2012 and now includes Statements of Compre-
and the reversal of taxable temporary differences. The Company
hensive Income (Loss) in its financial statements.
will continue to update this analysis on a periodic basis and
changes in expectations about future income or the timing
of the reversal of taxable temporary differences could cause
the Company to record a valuation allowance in a future period.
RECENT ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02,
“Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting Amounts
Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,”
which requires an entity to provide information about the
amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive
income by component. In addition, an entity is required to pres-
ent, either on the face of the statement where net income is
presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out
of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective
line items of net income if the amount reclassified is required
under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety
in the same reporting period. The ASU does not change the
current requirements for reporting net income or other compre-
hensive income in financial statements. The ASU is effective
prospectively for fiscal years and interim periods within those
years beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of
ASU 2013-02 is not expected to have a significant impact
on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, “Compre -
hensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date
of Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications
of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
in ASU No. 2011-05.” The amendments were made to allow
FASB time to redeliberate whether to present on the face
of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications
out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the
components of net income and other comprehensive income.
LEGAL MATTERS
The Company is involved in suits and claims in the normal course
of business, including without limitation product liability and gen-
eral liability claims and claims pending before the Equal Employ-
ment Opportunity Commission. On at least a quarterly basis, the
Company consults with its legal counsel to ascertain the reason-
able likelihood that such claims may result in a loss. As required
by ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies” (ASC 450), the Company cat-
egorizes the various suits and claims into three categories accord-
ing to their likelihood for resulting in potential loss: those that are
probable, those that are reasonably possible and those that
are deemed to be remote. Where losses are deemed to be prob-
able and estimable, accruals are made. Where losses are deemed
to be reasonably possible or remote, a range of loss estimates is
determined and considered for disclosure. Where no loss estimate
range can be made, the Company and its counsel perform a worst-
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive
case estimate. In determining these loss range estimates, the
Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income,”
Company considers known values of similar claims and consul-
which requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive
tation with independent counsel.
income, the components of net income, and the components
of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous
The Company believes that the aggregate range of estimated loss
stemming from the various suits and asserted and unasserted
claims which were deemed to be either probable or reasonably
possible was not material as of April 30, 2013.
22
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Customer receivables, net
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other
Deferred income taxes
Total Current Assets
Property, plant and equipment, net
Restricted cash
Promotional displays, net
Deferred income taxes
Other assets
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable
Current maturities of long-term debt
Accrued compensation and related expenses
Accrued marketing expenses
Other accrued expenses
Total Current Liabilities
Long-term debt, less current maturities
Defined benefit pension liabilities
Other long-term liabilities
Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
Common stock, no par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized; issued and
outstanding shares: at April 30, 2013: 14,822,580, at April 30, 2012: 14,395,273
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss—
Defined benefit pension plans
Total Shareholders’ Equity
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
APRIL 30
2013
2012
$ 96,971
39,044
29,338
3,084
9,481
177,918
74,064
—
5,811
29,262
6,938
$293,993
$ 23,306
1,155
26,213
10,159
8,275
69,108
23,594
53,696
1,400
—
107,165
71,180
(32,150)
146,195
$293,993
$ 66,620
32,533
22,340
2,523
7,086
131,102
75,375
7,064
5,073
34,969
11,538
$265,121
$ 19,492
875
21,963
8,756
8,135
59,221
23,790
50,547
1,543
—
96,205
61,422
(27,607)
130,020
$265,121
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 23
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
Net sales
Cost of sales and distribution
Gross Profit
Selling and marketing expenses
General and administrative expenses
Restructuring charges
Insurance proceeds
Operating Income (Loss)
Interest expense
Other income
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit)
Net Income (Loss)
SHARE INFORMATION
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic
Diluted
Cash dividends per share
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2013
$ 630,437
527,781
102,656
57,402
27,575
1,433
(975)
17,221
643
(162)
16,740
6,982
$
9,758
$
0.67
0.66
0.00
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
2012
$515,814
449,339
66,475
58,271
25,329
16,321
—
(33,446)
527
(685)
(33,288)
(12,502)
$ (20,786)
$
(1.45)
(1.45)
0.09
2011
$ 452,589
399,838
52,751
61,034
22,709
62
—
(31,054)
572
(1,666)
(29,960)
(9,942)
$ (20,018)
$
(1.40)
(1.40)
0.36
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
Net income (loss)
Other comprehensive loss net of tax:
Change in pension benefits, net of deferred taxes of $2,905, $3,624
and $294, respectively
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2013
$ 9,758
(4,543)
$
5,215
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
2012
2011
$(20,786)
$ (20,018)
(5,669)
$(26,455)
(460)
$ (20,478)
24
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
COMMON STOCK
SHARES
14,205,462
AMOUNT
$ 88,153
(in thousands, except share data)
Balance, May 1, 2010
Net loss
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Stock-based compensation
Adjustments to excess tax benefit
from stock-based compensation
Cash dividends
Exercise of stock-based compensation awards
Employee benefit plan contributions
27,401
62,677
RETAINED
EARNINGS
$108,643
(20,018)
(5,130)
ACCUMULATED
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
$(21,478)
$175,318
(460)
(20,018)
(460)
3,995
(1,347)
(5,130)
394
1,213
3,995
(1,347)
394
1,213
Balance, April 30, 2011
14,295,540
$ 92,408
$ 83,495
$(21,938)
$153,965
Net loss
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Stock-based compensation
Adjustments to excess tax benefit
from stock-based compensation
Cash dividends
Exercise of stock-based compensation awards
Employee benefit plan contributions
19,410
80,323
3,413
(859)
12
1,231
(5,669)
(20,786)
(1,287)
(20,786)
(5,669)
3,413
(859)
(1,287)
12
1,231
Balance, April 30, 2012
14,395,273
$ 96,205
$ 61,422
$(27,607)
$130,020
Net income
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Stock-based compensation
Adjustments to excess tax benefit
from stock-based compensation
Exercise of stock-based compensation awards
Employee benefit plan contributions
328,490
98,817
3,509
(650)
5,768
2,333
9,758
(4,543)
9,758
(4,543)
3,509
(650)
5,768
2,333
Balance, April 30, 2013
14,822,580
$107,165
$ 71,180
$(32,150)
$146,195
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 25
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Net loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Impairment loss related to restructuring activities
(Gain) loss on sales of assets held for sale
Gain on insurance recoveries
Stock-based compensation expense
Deferred income taxes
Pension contributions (in excess of) less than expense
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation
Other non-cash items
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Customer receivables
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Accounts payable
Accrued compensation, marketing and other accrued expenses
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Payments to acquire property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sales of assets held for sale
Proceeds from insurance recoveries
Investment in promotional displays
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Payments of long-term debt
Change in restricted cash
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and other
Payment of dividends
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year
2013
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
2012
2011
$ 9,758
$ (20,786)
$(20,018)
14,431
231
270
(481)
(975)
3,509
5,789
(4,299)
(18)
944
(6,825)
(7,068)
(1,669)
3,814
7,116
24,527
(8,860)
80
6,447
975
(4,759)
(6,117)
(1,019)
7,064
18
5,878
—
11,941
30,351
66,620
23,387
180
7,913
111
—
3,413
(12,290)
4,528
—
867
(1,533)
115
(320)
923
9,545
16,053
(6,679)
15
56
—
(3,310)
(9,918)
(1,021)
7,355
—
18
(1,287)
5,065
11,200
55,420
26,703
209
—
(982)
—
3,995
(8,185)
6,907
(80)
(971)
(3,514)
331
5,709
4,534
(1,442)
13,196
(4,952)
3
2,939
—
(3,456)
(5,466)
(892)
—
80
399
(5,130)
(5,543)
2,187
53,233
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year
$ 96,971
$ 66,620
$ 55,420
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
26
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
notes
to consolidated financial statements
NOTE A—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company manufactures and distributes kitchen cabinets
and vanities for the remodeling and new home construction
ADVERTISING COSTS: Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.
Advertising expenses for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 were
markets. The Company's products are sold across the United
$36.5 million, $37.4 million and $30.0 million, respectively.
States through a network of independent dealers and distribu-
tors and directly to home centers and major builders.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: Cash in excess of operating
requirements is invested in money market accounts which are
The following is a description of the Company’s significant
carried at cost (which approximates fair value). The Company
accounting policies:
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF
PRESENTATION: The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiary. Significant inter-company accounts and transac-
tions have been eliminated in consolidation.
REVENUE RECOGNITION: The Company recognizes revenue
when product is delivered to the customer and title has passed.
considers all highly liquid short-term investments with an origi-
nal maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash
equivalents. Cash equivalents were $38.9 million and $31.8 mil-
lion at April 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
INVENTORIES: Inventories are stated at lower of cost
or market. Inventory costs are determined by the last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method.
The LIFO cost reserve is determined in the aggregate for inventory
Revenue is based on invoice price less allowances for sales
and is applied as a reduction to inventories determined on the
returns, cash discounts and other deductions.
first-in, first-out method (FIFO). FIFO inventory cost approximates
COST OF SALES AND DISTRIBUTION: Cost of sales and
distribution includes all costs associated with the manufacture
and distribution of the Company’s products including the costs
of shipping and handling.
replacement cost.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT: Property, plant and
equipment is stated on the basis of cost less accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range
from 15 to 30 years for buildings and improvements and 3 to 10
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 27
years for machinery and equipment. Assets under capital leases
of plan assets and the benefit obligation, in its consolidated bal-
are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives
ance sheets. The Company also recognizes the actuarial gains
or the term of the related lease.
and losses and the prior service costs, credits and transition costs
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS: The Company reviews
its long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION: The Company recognizes
stock-based compensation expense based on the grant date
may not be recoverable. During fiscal years 2013, 2012 and
fair value over the requisite service period.
2011, the Company concluded no impairment existed, except
for impairments related to restructuring activities.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS: In February 2013,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
PROMOTIONAL DISPLAYS: The Company invests in promo-
tional displays in retail stores to demonstrate product features,
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, “Comprehen-
sive Income (Topic 220): Reporting Amounts Reclassified Out
product and quality specifications and serve as a training tool
of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” which requires
for retail kitchen designers. The Company invests in these long-
an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified
lived productive assets to provide the aforementioned benefits.
out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component.
The Company's investment in promotional displays is carried
In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face
at cost less applicable amortization. Amortization is provided
of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes,
by the straight-line method on an individual display basis over
significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other com-
periods of 30 to 36 months (the estimated period of benefit).
prehensive income by the respective line items of net income
Promotional display amortization expense for fiscal years 2013,
if the amount reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be
2012 and 2011 was $4.0 million, $5.6 million and $7.9 million,
reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting
respectively, and is included in selling and marketing expenses.
period. The ASU does not change the current requirements for
INCOME TAXES: The Company accounts for deferred income
taxes utilizing the asset and liability method, whereby deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the tax effects
of temporary differences between the financial statement
amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, using enacted
tax rates in effect for the year in which these items are expected
reporting net income or other comprehensive income in finan-
cial statements. The ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years
and interim periods within those years beginning after Decem-
ber 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2013-02, is not expected to
have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations
or financial position.
to reverse. At each reporting date, the Company evaluates the
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive
need for a valuation allowance to adjust deferred tax assets and
Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income,”
liabilities to an amount that more likely than not will be realized.
which requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive
PENSIONS: The Company has two non-contributory defined
benefit pension plans covering many of the Company’s employ-
ees hired before April 30, 2012. Both defined benefit pension
plans were frozen effective April 30, 2012. The Company recog-
nizes the overfunded or underfunded status of its defined benefit
pension plans, measured as the difference between the fair value
income, the components of net income, and the components
of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous
statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but
consecutive statements. Additionally, ASU 2011-05, eliminates
the option to present comprehensive income and its compo-
nents as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity. The ASU
does not change the items that must be reported in other
comprehensive income. The Company adopted this guidance
effective May 1, 2012 and now includes Statements of Compre-
hensive Income (Loss) in its financial statements.
28
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, “Compre-
hensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date
USE OF ESTIMATES: The preparation of consolidated financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted account-
of Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications
ing principles requires management to make estimates and
of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
in ASU No. 2011-05.” The amendments were made to allow
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
FASB time to redeliberate whether to present on the face
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during each
of accumulated other comprehensive income on the compo-
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
nents of net income and other comprehensive income.
NOTE B—CUSTOMER RECEIVABLES
The components of customer receivables were:
(in thousands)
Gross customer receivables
Less:
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Allowance for returns and discounts
Net customer receivables
NOTE C—INVENTORIES
The components of inventories were:
(in thousands)
Raw materials
Work-in-process
Finished goods
Total FIFO inventories
Reserve to adjust inventories to LIFO value
Total LIFO inventories
APRIL 30
APRIL 30
2013
$ 41,397
(148)
(2,205)
$ 39,044
2013
$ 11,823
17,170
11,318
40,311
(10,973)
$ 29,338
2012
$ 34,572
(93)
(1,946)
$ 32,533
2012
$ 9,412
14,543
8,734
32,689
(10,349)
$ 22,340
There was no liquidation of LIFO based inventories in fiscal 2013 to impact net income. After tax losses were impacted
by $125,000 and $34,000 in fiscal years 2012 and 2011, respectively, as a result of liquidation of LIFO based inventories.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 29
NOTE D—PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The components of property, plant and equipment were:
(in thousands)
Land
Buildings and improvements
Buildings and improvements—capital leases
Machinery and equipment
Machinery and equipment—capital leases
Construction in progress
Less accumulated amortization and depreciation
Total
$
2013
5,929
65,245
11,202
177,393
26,966
1,494
288,229
(214,165)
$ 74,064
APRIL 30
$
2012
5,929
65,750
11,202
169,406
26,685
2,908
281,880
(206,505)
$ 75,375
Amortization and depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment amounted to $9.2 million, $16.8 million and $18.1 million
in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Accumulated amortization on capital leases included in the above table amounted
to $26.6 million as of both April 30, 2013 and 2012.
NOTE E—LOANS PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Maturities of long-term debt are as follows:
FISCAL YEARS ENDING APRIL 30
(in thousands)
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019 AND
TOTAL
THEREAFTER OUTSTANDING
Revolving credit facility
Economic development loans
Term loans
Capital lease obligations
Total
Less current maturities
Total long-term debt
$ —
—
349
806
$1,155
$ —
—
370
835
$1,205
$10,000
—
393
854
$ 11,247
$ —
—
411
763
$ 1,174
$ —
—
2,007
593
$2,600
$ —
3,480
—
3,888
$7,368
$10,000
3,480
3,530
7,739
$ 224,749
$ 1,155
$$ 223,594
The Company’s primary loan agreement is a $35 million secured
An amendment to the revolving credit facility and modifications
revolving credit facility which expires on December 31, 2015
to related security arrangements completed on March 18, 2013
with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo). The Company incurs
eliminated the requirement that 50% of the Company’s out-
a fee for amounts not used under the revolving credit facility.
standing indebtedness and other obligations to Wells Fargo be
Fees paid by the Company related to non-usage of its current
secured by cash and securities held in certain of the Company’s
and former credit facilities have been included in interest
accounts with Wells Fargo. The Company’s outstanding indebt-
expense and were $61,000, $54,158 and $54,002 for fiscal
edness and other obligations to Wells Fargo are secured by
years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
substantially all of the Company’s assets. The Company can
borrow under the revolving credit facility up to the lesser of
$35 million or the maximum borrowing base (which equals
75% of eligible accounts receivable, 50% of eligible pre bill
30
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
reserves and up to $20 million for equipment value, each as
Company’s capital investment and operations at the Allegany
defined in the agreement) less any outstanding loan balance.
County, Maryland site. These loan agreements were amended
Any outstanding loan balance bears interest at the London
in 2013 and 2008. The aggregate balance of these loan agree-
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) (0.25% at April 30, 2013) plus
ments was $2,190,000 and $2,234,000 for fiscal years ended
2.625%. Under the terms of the revolving credit facility, the
April 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The loan agreements expire
Company must: (1) maintain at the end of each fiscal quarter
at December 31,2018 and bear interest at a fixed rate of 3% per
a ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth of not greater
annum. These loan agreements are secured by mortgages on the
than 1.4 to 1.0; (2) maintain at the end of each fiscal quarter
manufacturing facility constructed in Allegany County, Maryland.
a ratio of cash flow to fixed charges of not less than 1.25 to 1.0
These loan agreements defer principal and interest during
measured on a rolling four-quarter basis; (3) maintain at least
the term of the obligation and forgive any outstanding balance
$1.00 in net income for the fiscal quarter ending April 30, 2013
at December 31, 2018, if the Company complies with certain
and at least $1.00 in net income on a rolling four-quarter basis
employment levels at the facility.
for the fiscal quarter ending July 31, 2013; and comply with other
customary affirmative and negative covenants.
In 2002, the Company entered into a loan agreement with the
Perry, Harlan, Leslie, Breathitt Regional Industrial Authority
The Company was in compliance with all covenants specified
(a.k.a. Coalfields Regional Industrial Authority, Inc.) as part of
in the amended revolving credit facility as of April 30, 2013,
the Company’s capital investment and operations at the Hazard,
as follows: (1) the Company’s ratio of total liabilities to tangible
Kentucky site. This debt facility is a $6 million term loan, which
net worth at April 30, 2013 was 1.0 to 1.0; (2) cash flow to fixed
expires November 13,2017, bearing interest at a fixed rate of
charges for its most recent four quarters was 2.72 to 1.0; and
2% per annum. It is secured by a mortgage on the manufactur-
(3) its net income for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2013
ing facility constructed in Hazard, Kentucky. The loan requires
was $5.2 million.
The revolving credit facility does not limit the Company’s ability
to pay dividends or repurchase its common stock as long as the
Company is in compliance with these covenants.
In 2009, the Company entered into a loan agreement with
the Board of County Commissioners of Garrett County as
part of the Company’s capital investment in land located
in Garrett County, Maryland. This loan agreement is secured
by a Deed of Trust on the property and bears interest at
a fixed rate of 3%. The agreement defers principal and interest
during the term of the obligation and forgives any outstanding
balance at December 31, 2019, if the Company complies
annual debt service payments consisting of principal and inter-
est with a fixed balloon payment of $1.6 million at loan expira-
tion. The outstanding amounts owed as of April 30, 2013 and
2012 were $3,530,000 and $3,858,000, respectively.
In 2013 and 2012, the Company entered into a total of six
capitalized lease agreements in the aggregate amount of
$639,000 with First American Financial Bancorp related
to financing computer equipment. Each lease has a term
of 48 months and an interest rate of 6.5%. The leases require
quarterly rental payments. The aggregate outstanding amount
under all of these leases as of April 30, 2013 and 2012 was
$545,000 and $95,000, respectively.
with certain employment levels. The outstanding balance
During 2013, the Company entered into five capitalized lease
as of April 30, 2013 and 2012 was $1,290,000.
agreements in the aggregate amount of $568,000 with e-Plus
In 2005, the Company entered into two separate loan agree-
ments with the Maryland Economic Development Corporation
and the County Commissioners of Allegany County as part of the
Group related to financing computer equipment. Each lease
has a term of 51 months and an interest rate of 6.5%. The
leases require monthly rental payments. The aggregate out-
standing amount under all of these leases as of April 30, 2013
was $529,000.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 31
In 2004, the Company entered into a lease agreement with
Certain of the Company’s loan agreements limit the amount and
the West Virginia Economic Development Authority as part
type of indebtedness the Company can incur and require the
of the Company’s capital investment and operations at the
Company to maintain specified financial ratios measured on
South Branch plant located in Hardy County, West Virginia.
a quarterly basis. In addition to the assets previously discussed,
This capital lease agreement is a $10 million term obligation,
certain of the Company’s property, plant and equipment are pledged
which expires June 30, 2024, bearing interest at a fixed rate
as collateral under term loan agreements and capital lease
of 2% per annum. The lease requires monthly rental payments.
arrangements. The Company was in compliance with all covenants
The outstanding amounts owed as of April 30, 2013 and 2012
contained in its loan agreements and capital leases at April30,2013.
were $6,665,000 and $7,188,000, respectively.
Interest paid under the Company’s loan agreements and capital
leases during fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $576,000,
$453,000 and $467,000, respectively.
NOTE F—EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following table summarizes the computations of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator used in basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss)
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per common share—
weighted-average shares
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and restricted stock units
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per common share—
weighted-average shares and assumed conversions
Net earnings (loss) per share
Basic
Diluted
2013
$ 9,758
14,563
270
14,833
$ 0.67
$ 0.66
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
2012
2011
$(20,786)
$(20,018)
14,344
—
14,344
14,252
—
14,252
$
$
(1.45)
(1.45)
$
$
(1.40)
(1.40)
Potentially dilutive shares of 1.0 million, 1.8 million and 1.7 million issuable under the Company’s stock incentive plans have
been excluded from the calculation of net earnings (loss) per share for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011,
respectively, as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
32
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
NOTE G—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has two types of stock-based compensation
stock option awards is expensed on a straight-line basis over
awards in effect for its employees and directors. The Company
the vesting period of the stock options. The expected volatility
has issued stock options since 1986 and restricted stock units
assumption is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s
(RSUs) since fiscal 2010. Total compensation expense related
stock over a term equal to the expected term of the option
to stock-based awards for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2013,
granted. The expected term of stock option awards granted
2012 and 2011 was $3.5 million, $3.4 million and $4.0 million,
is derived from the Company’s historical exercise experience
respectively. The Company recognizes stock-based compensa-
and represents the period of time that stock option awards
tion costs net of an estimated forfeiture rate for those shares
granted are expected to be outstanding for each of the three
expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite
identified groups. The expected term assumption incorporates
service period of the award. The Company estimates the forfei-
the contractual term of an option grant, which is generally ten
ture rates based upon its historical experience.
years for employees and from four to ten years for non-employee
STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
At April 30, 2013, the Company had stock option and RSU awards
directors, as well as the vesting period of an award, which
is typically three years. The risk-free interest rate is based on
the implied yield on a U.S. Treasury constant maturity with a
outstanding under four different plans: (1) 1999 stock option
remaining term equal to the expected term of the option granted.
plan for employees; (2) amended and restated 2004 stock incen-
tive plan for employees; (3) 2006 non-employee directors equity
ownership plan; and (4) 2011 non-employee directors equity
ownership plan. As of April 30, 2013, there were 1,133,999 shares
of common stock available for future stock-based compensation
awards under the Company’s stock incentive plans.
METHODOLOGY ASSUMPTIONS
For purposes of valuing stock option grants, the Company has
identified two employee groups and one non-employee director
group, based upon observed option exercise patterns. The Com-
pany uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value the
Company’s stock options for each of the three groups. Using this
option-pricing model, the fair value of each stock option award
is estimated on the date of grant. The fair value of the Company’s
For purposes of determining the fair value of RSUs, the Company
uses the closing stock price of its common stock as reported
on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of grant,
reduced by the discounted value of future expected dividend
payments during the vesting period, since the recipients are
not entitled to dividends during the vesting period. The fair value
of the Company’s RSU awards is expensed on a straight-line basis
over the vesting period of the RSUs to the extent the Company
believes it is probable the related performance criteria, if any, will
be met. The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield
on a U.S. Treasury constant maturity with a remaining term equal
to the vesting period of the RSU grant.
The weighted-average assumptions and valuation of the Company’s stock options were as follows:
Weighted-average fair value of grants
Expected volatility
Expected term in years
Risk-free interest rate
Expected dividend yield
2013
$ 7.39
42.5%
6.1
1.09%
0.0%
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
2012
$ 5.43
35.1%
6.0
2.24%
2.0%
2011
$ 8.87
49.1%
6.2
2.64%
1.7%
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 33
STOCK OPTION ACTIVITY
Stock options granted and outstanding under each of the Company’s plans vest evenly over a three-year period and have
contractual terms of ten years. The exercise price of all stock options granted is equal to the fair market value of the Company’s
common stock on the option grant date.
The following table presents a summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2013, 2012
and 2011 (remaining contractual term in years and exercise prices are weighted-averages):
Outstanding at April 30, 2010
Granted
Exercised
Cancelled or expired
Outstanding at April 30, 2011
Granted
Exercised
Cancelled or expired
Outstanding at April 30, 2012
Granted
Exercised
Cancelled or expired
Outstanding at April 30, 2013
NUMBER
OF
OPTIONS
2,105,515
115,000
(27,000)
(588,159)
1,605,356
130,000
(1,200)
(109,396)
1,624,760
125,000
(251,799)
(96,148)
1,401,813
Vested and expected to vest in the future at April 30, 2013
Exercisable at April 30, 2013
1,375,039
1,156,809
REMAINING
CONTRACTUAL
TERM
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
EXERCISE
PRICE
AGGREGATE
INTRINSIC
VALUE
(in thousands)
5.6
9.1
—
—
5.7
9.1
—
—
5.1
9.1
—
—
4.8
4.7
4.0
$29.03
20.87
14.80
29.58
$28.48
18.16
14.93
28.82
$27.64
17.62
23.35
31.03
$27.27
$27.43
$29.17
$ 295
—
216
—
$
29
—
6
—
$ —
—
1,868
—
$9,272
$8,871
$5,509
The aggregate intrinsic value in the previous table of the
As of April 30, 2013, there was $0.9 million of total unrecog-
outstanding options on April 30, 2013 represents the total
nized compensation expense related to unvested stock options
pre-tax intrinsic value (the excess, if any, of the Company’s
granted under the Company’s stock-based compensation plans.
closing stock price on the last trading day of fiscal 2013 over
This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-
the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money
average period of 1.8 years.
options) of the shares of the Company’s common stock that
would have been received by the option holders had all option
holders exercised their options on April 30, 2013. This amount
changes based upon the fair market value of the Company’s
common stock. The total fair value of options vested for the
fiscal years ended April 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $1.2 mil-
lion, $2.4 million and $3.3 million, respectively.
Cash received from option exercises for the fiscal years ended
April 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, was an aggregate of $5.9 mil-
lion, $0.0 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The actual
tax benefit realized for the tax deduction from option exercises
of stock option awards totaled $729,000, $3,000 and
$84,000 for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2013, 2012
and 2011, respectively.
34
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at April 30, 2013 (remaining lives in years and exercise
prices are weighted-averages):
OPTION PRICE
PER SHARE
$17.62–$18.16
$20.87–$26.85
$28.97–$34.63
$38.37–$42.17
OPTIONS
223,334
497,467
658,400
22,612
1,401,813
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING
REMAINING LIFE
EXERCISE PRICE
OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
OPTIONS
EXERCISE PRICE
8.7
5.0
3.4
1.5
$17.86
24.05
32.39
41.73
14,998
460,799
658,400
22,612
1,156,809
$ 18.16
24.30
32.39
41.73
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT ACTIVITY:
The Company’s RSUs granted to employees cliff-vest over
and 2011. The PBRSUs granted in fiscal 2013 are earned
based on achievement of a number of goals pertaining to
a three-year period from date of grant, while RSUs granted
the Company’s operational and financial performance during
to non-employee directors vest daily over a two-year period
the performance period of fiscal 2013. Employees who satisfy
from date of grant. Directors were granted service-based RSUs
the vesting criteria will receive a proportional amount of
only, while employees were awarded both service-based and
PBRSUs based upon the Compensation Committee’s assessment
performance-based RSUs (PBRSUs) in fiscal years 2013, 2012
of the Company’s achievement of the performance criteria.
The following table contains a summary of the Company’s RSU activity for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
PERFORMANCE-BASED
RSUs
SERVICE-BASED
RSUs
Issued and outstanding, April 30, 2010
Granted
Cancelled due to non-achievement
of performance goals
Settled in common stock
Forfeited
Issued and outstanding, April 30, 2011
Granted
Cancelled due to non-achievement
of performance goals
Settled in common stock
Forfeited
Issued and outstanding, April 30, 2012
Granted
Cancelled due to non-achievement
of performance goals
Settled in common stock
Forfeited
Issued and outstanding, April 30, 2013
117,900
125,475
(63,145)
(364)
(5,296)
174,570
134,250
(48,870)
(666)
(22,208)
237,076
129,075
(24,311)
(49,546)
(13,189)
279,105
60,500
61,825
—
(260)
(2,965)
119,100
64,750
—
(17,951)
(10,171)
155,728
63,025
—
(58,328)
(5,425)
155,000
TOTAL
RSUs
178,400
187,300
(63,145)
(624)
(8,261)
293,670
199,000
(48,870)
(18,617)
(32,379)
392,804
192,100
(24,311)
(107,874)
(18,614)
434,105
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
GRANT DATE
FAIR VALUE
$ 21.99
$ 19.25
$ 22.10
$ 22.10
$ 21.96
$20.25
$ 17.00
$ 19.81
$ 21.15
$ 19.30
$ 18.75
$ 17.76
$ 17.09
$20.66
$ 17.91
$ 17.96
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 35
As of April 30, 2013, there was $2.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs granted under the
Company’s stock-based compensation plans. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years.
For the fiscal years ended April 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011 stock-based compensation expense was allocated as follows:
(in thousands)
Cost of sales and distribution
Selling and marketing expenses
General and administrative expenses
Stock-based compensation expense, before income taxes
2013
$ 606
859
2,044
$ 3,509
2012
$ 531
715
2,167
$ 3,413
2011
$ 735
842
2,418
$ 3,995
NOTE H—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AND RETIREMENT PLANS
EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
In fiscal 1990, the Company instituted the American Woodmark
stock to 100% of an employee’s annual contribution to the plan
up to 4% of base earnings. The expense for 401(k) matching
Investment Savings Stock Ownership Plan. Under this plan,
contributions for this plan was $2,547,000, $1,284,000 and
all employees who are at least 18 years old and have been
$1,272,000, in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
employed by the Company for at least six consecutive months
are eligible to receive Company stock through a discretionary
profit-sharing contribution and a 401(k) matching contribution
based upon the employee's contribution to the plan.
Beginning in fiscal 2013, discretionary profit-sharing contribu-
tions in the form of Company stock may be made annually.
Prior to fiscal 2013, profit-sharing contributions in the form
of Company stock were 3% of after-tax earnings, calculated
on a quarterly basis. The Company recognized expenses
PENSION BENEFITS
The Company has two defined benefit pension plans covering
many of the Company’s employees hired prior to April 30, 2012.
These plans provide defined benefits based on years of service
and final average earnings (for salaried employees) or benefit
rate (for hourly employees).
Effective April 30, 2012, the Company froze all future benefit
accruals under the Company’s hourly and salary defined bene-
for profit-sharing contributions of $293,000 in fiscal 2013.
fit pension plans.
The Company did not make, or recognize any expenses for,
discretionary profit-sharing contributions in fiscal years 2012
and 2011.
Prior to fiscal 2013, the Company matched 401(k) contribu-
tions in the form of Company stock at 50% of an employee’s
annual contribution to the plan up to 4% of base earnings
for an effective maximum Company contribution of 2%
of base earnings. Beginning in fiscal 2013, as part of the
realignment of its retirement plans, the Company increased
the match on 401(k) contributions in the form of Company
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at April 30,
2013 is $52.7 million ($32.1 million net of tax) related to net
unrecognized actuarial losses and unrecognized prior service
costs that have not yet been recognized in net periodic pension
benefit costs. The Company expects to recognize $1.1 million
($0.7 million net of tax) in net actuarial losses in net periodic
pension benefit costs during fiscal 2014. The Company uses
an April 30 measurement date for its benefit plans.
36
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status of the Company’s non-contributory
defined benefit pension plans as of April 30:
(in thousands)
CHANGE IN PROJECTED BENEFIT OBLIGATION
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial losses
Benefits paid
Curtailments
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Company contributions
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Funded status of the plans
Unamortized prior service cost
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
Accrued benefit cost
AMOUNTS RECOGNIZED IN
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Defined benefit pension liabilities
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Net amount recognized
PENSION BENEFITS
2013
2012
$136,264
—
6,261
10,801
(3,897)
—
$149,429
$ 85,717
8,993
4,920
(3,897)
$ 95,733
$ (53,696)
—
52,703
$
(993)
$ (53,696)
52,703
$
(993)
$120,059
5,305
6,533
26,318
(3,293)
(18,658)
$136,264
$ 83,334
2,805
2,871
(3,293)
$ 85,717
$ (50,547)
—
45,255
$ (5,292)
$ (50,547)
45,255
$ (5,292)
The accumulated benefit obligation for both pension plans was $149,429,000 and $136,264,000 at April 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(in thousands)
2013
PENSION BENEFITS
2012
COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC PENSION BENEFIT COST
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of prior service cost
Curtailment loss
Recognized net actuarial loss
Pension benefit cost
$
—
6,261
(6,563)
—
—
923
$
621
$ 5,305
6,533
(6,533)
53
331
1,710
$ 7,399
2011
$ 4,717
6,268
(6,159)
85
—
1,996
$ 6,907
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 37
ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS: The discount rate at April 30 was used to measure the year-end benefit obligations and
the earnings effects for the subsequent year. Actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and earnings
effects for the pension plans follow:
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS
TO DETERMINE BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS
Discount rate
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS
TO DETERMINE NET PERIODIC PENSION BENEFIT COST
Discount rate
Expected return on plan assets
Rate of compensation increase
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
2012
2013
4.21%
2013
4.66%
7.5%
*
4.66%
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
2012
2011
5.66%/4.76%1
8.0%
4.0%
5.91%
8.0%
4.0%
1 The discount rate was 5.66% from May 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and 4.76% from January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2012. The rate changed
during fiscal 2012 as a result of the required re-measurement of the Company’s pension liability upon its decision to freeze its pension plans.
* The rate of compensation increase is not applicable for periods beyond April 30, 2012 because the Company froze its pension plans effective
as of that date.
In fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company determined the discount
rate by referencing the Aon Hewitt AA Bond Universe Yield
CONTRIBUTIONS: The Company funds the pension plans in
amounts sufficient to meet minimum funding requirements set
Curve. In fiscal 2011, the Company referred to the Hewitt
forth in employee benefit and tax laws plus additional amounts
Above Median Yield Curve in establishing the discount rate.
the Company deems appropriate.
This change was caused by the merger of Aon and Hewitt
and the corresponding elimination of the Hewitt Above
Median Yield Curve. The Company believes that using a yield
curve approach accurately reflects changes in the present
value of liabilities over time since each cash flow is discounted
at the rate at which it could effectively be settled.
In developing the expected long-term rate of return assumption
for the assets of the defined benefit pension plans, the Company
evaluated input from its third party pension plan asset managers,
including their review of asset class return expectations and long-
term inflation assumptions. The Company also considered the
related historical ten-year average asset returns at April 30, 2013.
The Company amortizes experience gains and losses, as well as
the effects of changes in actuarial assumptions and plan provisions,
over the average remaining lifetime of the active participants.
The Company expects to contribute $2.3 million to its pension
plans in fiscal 2014. The Company made contributions of
$4.9 million and $2.9 million to its pension plans in fiscal 2013
and 2012, respectively.
ESTIMATED FUTURE BENEFIT PAYMENTS: The following
benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are
expected to be paid:
FISCAL YEAR
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Years 2019–2023
BENEFIT PAYMENTS
(in thousands)
$ 4,247
4,698
5,156
5,511
5,888
35,710
38
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
PLAN ASSETS: Pension assets by major category and the type of fair value measurement as of April 30, 2013 and 2012 are
presented in the following tables:
(in thousands)
Cash Equivalents
Equity Collective Funds:1
Equity Index Value Fund
Equity Index Growth Fund
Small Cap Index Fund
International Equity Fund
Fixed Income Collective Funds:1
Core Fixed Income Fund
Capital Preservation Fund
Total
(in thousands)
Cash Equivalents
Equity Collective Funds:1
Equity Index Value Fund
Equity Index Growth Fund
Small Cap Index Fund
International Equity Fund
Fixed Income Collective Funds:1
Core Fixed Income Fund
Capital Preservation Fund
Total
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AT APRIL 30, 2013
QUOTED
SIGNIFICANT
PRICES IN ACTIVE OBSERVABLE
MARKETS
(LEVEL 1)
$ 315
—
—
—
—
—
—
$315
INPUTS
(LEVEL 2)
$
—
19,202
19,245
5,632
3,932
17,407
30,000
$ 95,418
SIGNIFICANT
UNOBSERVABLE
INPUTS
(LEVEL 3)
$ —
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ —
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AT APRIL 30, 2012
QUOTED
SIGNIFICANT
PRICES IN ACTIVE OBSERVABLE
MARKETS
(LEVEL 1)
$ 273
—
—
—
—
—
—
$273
INPUTS
(LEVEL 2)
$
—
16,850
17,094
5,002
3,315
25,824
17,359
$85,444
SIGNIFICANT
UNOBSERVABLE
INPUTS
(LEVEL 3)
$ —
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ —
TOTAL
$
315
19,202
19,245
5,632
3,932
17,407
30,000
$95,733
TOTAL
$
273
16,850
17,094
5,002
3,315
25,824
17,359
$85,717
1 The Collective Trust Funds are valued by applying each plan’s ownership percentage in the fund to the fund’s net assets at fair value
at the valuation date.
INVESTMENT STRATEGY: The Company has established formal
investment policies for the assets associated with its pension
plans. The objectives of the investment strategies include
preservation of capital and long-term growth of capital while
avoiding excessive risk. Target allocation percentages are estab-
lished at an asset class level by the Company’s Pension Commit-
tee. Target allocation ranges are guidelines, not limitations, and
occasionally the Pension Committee will approve allocations
above or below a target range.
During a period of uncertainty in the equity and fixed income
markets, the Pension Committee may suspend the Target Asset
Allocation and manage the investment mix as it sees reasonable,
prudent and in the best interest of the plans to better protect the
value of the plan assets.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 39
The Company’s pension plans’ weighted-average asset allocations
Within the broad categories outlined in the preceding table,
at April 30, 2013 and 2012, by asset category, were as follows:
the Company has targeted the following specific allocations
APRIL 30
Equity Funds
Fixed Income Funds
Total
PLAN ASSET ALLOCATION
2013
ACTUAL
2013
TARGET
2012
ACTUAL
50.0%
50.0%
50.2%
49.8%
100.0%
100.0%
49.5%
50.5%
100.0%
NOTE I—INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense was comprised of the following:
(in thousands)
CURRENT EXPENSE (BENEFIT)
Federal
State
Total current expense (benefit)
DEFERRED EXPENSE (BENEFIT)
Federal
State
Total deferred expense (benefit)
Total expense (benefit)
Other comprehensive loss
Total comprehensive income tax expense (benefit)
as a percentage of total funds invested: 19% Capital Preserva-
tion, 31% Bond, 20% Large Capital Growth, 20% Large Capital
Value, 6% Small Capital and 4% International.
2013
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
2012
2011
$ 1,031
162
1,193
4,859
930
5,789
6,982
(2,905)
$ 4,077
$
(36)
(176)
(212)
(10,115)
(2,175)
(12,290)
(12,502)
(3,624)
$(16,126)
The Company’s effective income tax rate varied from the federal statutory rate as follows:
Federal statutory rate
Effect of:
Tax basis adjustment
Meals and entertainment
Other
Total
Effective federal income tax rate
State income taxes, net of federal tax effect
Effective income tax rate
2013
35.0%
0.0%
1.5
1.1
2.6%
37.6%
4.1
41.7%
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
2012
35.0%
(1.7)%
(0.8)
0.0
(2.5)%
32.5%
5.1
37.6%
Income taxes paid were $1,219,000, $229,000 and $235,000 for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
40
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
$ (2,368)
611
(1,757)
(6,065)
(2,120)
(8,185)
(9,942)
(294)
$(10,236)
2011
35.0%
(3.3)%
(0.8)
(0.8)
(4.9)%
30.1%
3.1
33.2%
The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
(in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Pension benefits
Accounts receivable
Product liability
Employee benefits
Net operating loss carryforward
Income tax credits
Depreciation
Other
Total
Deferred tax liabilities:
Inventory
Net deferred tax asset
APRIL 30
2013
2012
$20,563
3,983
700
11,243
1,099
1,088
73
496
39,245
502
$38,743
$ 18,238
3,103
735
10,878
6,686
747
896
772
42,055
—
$42,055
The net operating loss carryforward value for April 30, 2013 contained in the above table includes amounts pertaining to various
state net operating loss carryforwards with various expiration dates.
Management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize its gross deferred tax assets due to expected future
taxable income and the reversal of taxable temporary differences.
NOTE J—ACCOUNTING FOR
UNCERTAINTY IN INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for its income tax uncertainties in
accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” The Company
had no liability relating to uncertain tax positions for the years
ended April 30, 2013 and 2012.
result in a loss. As required by ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies”
(ASC 450), the Company categorizes the various suits and
claims into three categories according to their likelihood
for resulting in potential loss: those that are probable, those
that are reasonably possible and those that are deemed
to be remote. Where losses are deemed to be probable and
estimable, accruals are made. Where losses are deemed to
With minor exceptions, the Company is currently open to audit
be reasonably possible or remote, a range of loss estimates
by tax authorities for tax years ending April 30, 2010 through
is determined and considered for disclosure. Where no loss
April 30, 2013. The Company is currently not under federal audit.
estimate range can be made, the Company and its counsel
NOTE K—COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
LEGAL MATTERS
The Company is involved in suits and claims in the normal
perform a worst-case estimate. In determining these loss
range estimates, the Company considers known values
of similar claims and consultation with independent counsel.
The Company believes that the aggregate range of loss stemming
from the various suits and asserted and unasserted claims which
course of business, including without limitation product liability
were deemed to be either probable or reasonably possible was
and general liability claims, and claims pending before
not material as of April 30, 2013.
the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. On at least
a quarterly basis, the Company consults with its legal counsel
to ascertain the reasonable likelihood that such claims may
PRODUCT WARRANTY
The Company estimates outstanding warranty costs based
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 41
on the historical relationship between warranty claims and
is owned by the partnership. The Company has subsequently
revenues. The warranty accrual is reviewed monthly to verify
renewed this lease in accordance with Company policy and
that it properly reflects the remaining obligation based on
procedures which includes approval by the Board of Directors.
the anticipated expenditures over the balance of the obligation
As of April 30, 2013, the Company is in the third year of the
period. Adjustments are made when actual warranty claim
latest five-year renewal period, which expires in 2016. Under
experience differs from estimates. Warranty claims are gener-
this agreement, rental expense was $461,000, $460,000
ally made within two months of the original shipment date.
and $460,000, in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The following is a reconciliation of the Company’s warranty liability:
Rent during the remaining term of approximately $1,397,000
(included in the preceding table) is subject to annual increases
(in thousands)
2013
2012
of 2% through the remaining term of the lease.
PRODUCT WARRANTY RESERVE
Beginning balance
Accrual for warranties
Settlements
Ending balance at fiscal year end
$ 1,885
9,839
(9,929)
$ 1,795
$ 1,738
8,605
(8,458)
$ 1,885
LEASE AGREEMENTS
The Company leases certain office buildings, manufacturing
buildings, service centers and equipment. Total rental
expenses under operating leases amounted to approximately
$7,378,000, $7,206,000 and $7,518,000, in fiscal years 2013,
2012 and 2011, respectively. Minimum rental commitments
as of April 30, 2013, under noncancelable leases with terms
in excess of one year are as follows:
NOTE L—CREDIT CONCENTRATION
Credit is extended to customers based on an evaluation of each
customer’s financial condition and generally collateral is not
required. The Company’s customers operate in the new home
construction and home remodeling markets.
The Company maintains an allowance for bad debt based upon
management’s evaluation and judgment of potential net loss.
The allowance is estimated based upon historical experience,
the effects of current developments and economic conditions
and of each customer’s current and anticipated financial con-
dition. Estimates and assumptions are periodically reviewed
and updated. Any resulting adjustments to the allowance are
FISCAL YEAR
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019 (and thereafter)
Less amounts representing interest (2%)
Total obligations under capital leases
OPERATING
(in thousands)
CAPITAL
(in thousands)
reflected in current operating results.
$ 3,411
3,102
2,768
1,336
217
92
$10,926
$ 997
997
986
866
678
4,140
$ 8,664
(925)
$ 7,739
At April 30, 2013, the Company’s two largest customers,
Customers A and B, represented 21.1% and 21.1% of the
Company’s gross customer receivables, respectively. At April 30,
2012, Customers A and B represented 26.5% and 30.7% of the
Company’s gross customer receivables, respectively.
The following table summarizes the percentage of sales to the
Company’s two largest customers for the last three fiscal years:
PERCENT OF ANNUAL GROSS SALES
2012
2011
2013
Customer A
Customer B
35.7
22.8
41.5
26.0
38.7
34.2
RELATED PARTIES
During fiscal 1985, prior to becoming a publicly held corpora-
tion, the Company entered into an agreement with a partnership
which includes certain former executive officers and current
significant shareholders of the Company, including one current
member of the Board of Directors of the Company, to lease the
Company’s headquarters building which was constructed and
42
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
NOTE M—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company utilizes the hierarchy of fair value measurements
to classify certain of its assets and liabilities based upon the
LEVEL 2—Investments with observable inputs other than Level 1
prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities;
following definitions:
LEVEL 1— Investments with quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities. The Company’s cash equivalents are
invested in money market funds, mutual funds and United States
quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs
that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market
data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
The Company has no Level 2 assets or liabilities.
Treasury instruments. The Company’s mutual fund investment
assets represent contributions made and invested on behalf
LEVEL 3—Investments with unobservable inputs that are
supported by little or no market activity and that are significant
of the Company’s named executive officers in a supplementary
to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The Company has
employee retirement plan.
no Level 3 assets or liabilities.
The following table summarizes the fair value of assets that are recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements
as of April 30, 2013 and 2012 at fair value on a recurring basis:
(in thousands)
ASSETS:
Money market funds
Mutual funds
Total assets at fair value
(in thousands)
ASSETS:
Money market funds
Mutual funds
Total assets at fair value
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AS OF APRIL 30, 2013
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 1
$ 38,875
1,311
$ 40,186
$ —
—
$ —
$ —
—
$ —
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AS OF APRIL 30, 2012
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 1
$ 38,874
1,357
$ 40,231
$ —
—
$ —
$ —
—
$ —
The fair value measurement of assets held by the Company’s defined benefit pension plans is discussed in Note H.
NOTE N—RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the continuing impact of the
housing economy’s lengthy downturn caused the Company to
announce a restructuring initiative (“2012 Restructuring Plan”) that
committed to the closing of two of the Company’s manufacturing
plants located in Hardy County, West Virginia and Hazard, Kentucky,
offering its previously idled plant in Tahlequah, Oklahoma for sale,
and realigning its retirement program, including freezing the
Company’s defined benefit pension plans. Operations ceased
at the Hazard plant in April 2012 and at the Hardy County plant
in May 2012. The 2012 Restructuring Plan was adopted to reduce
costs and increase the Company’s capacity utilization rates.
During fiscal 2012, the Company recognized pre-tax restructuring
charges of $15.9 million related to the 2012 Restructuring Plan.
During fiscal 2013, the Company recognized pre-tax restructuring
charges of $1.4 million related to the 2012 Restructuring Plan,
including severance and separation costs of $0.2 million,
building impairment charges of $0.3 million, facilities-related
expenses of $0.7 million and professional fees of $0.2 million.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 43
A reserve for restructuring charges in the amount of $13 thousand
During fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company
is included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as
recognized total pre-tax restructuring charges for both the
of April 30, 2013 which relates to employee termination costs
2012 Restructuring Plan and the 2009 Restructuring Plan
accrued but not yet paid. Below is the summary of the restruc-
of $1.4 million, $16.3 million and $62,000, respectively. The
turing reserve balance as of April 30, 2013:
Company recognized recurring operating costs for the facilities
(in thousands)
2012 RESTRUCTURING PLAN
Restructuring reserve balance as of April 30, 2012
Additions
Payments
Reserve balance as of April 30, 2013
$ 2,817
196
(3,000)
$
13
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company announced
a restructuring plan (“2009 Restructuring Plan”) to close two
of its manufacturing plants, located in Berryville, Virginia and
Moorefield, West Virginia and suspend operations in a third
manufacturing plant located in Tahlequah, Oklahoma. These
actions were completed during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
These initiatives were intended to increase the Company’s
capacity utilization rates and decrease overhead costs. In
addition to these initiatives, the Company made other staffing
reductions during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
closed as part of the 2012 Restructuring Plan of $0.9 million
in fiscal 2013. The Company will continue to incur costs related
to its closed and unsold plants until they are sold.
The Company has a total of two manufacturing plants
classified as held for sale, which were closed in the 2012
Restructuring Plan. During the second quarter of fiscal 2013,
the Company sold its closed plant located in Tahlequah,
Oklahoma and recognized a gain of $0.3 million on the sale.
The gain was included in restructuring charges on the Company’s
statements of operations. During fiscal 2013, the Company
recorded impairment charges of $0.3 million relating to one
of the plants that is included as held for sale. The Company
believes that the remaining $2.7 million net book value of the
properties classified as held for sale is fully recoverable. These
assets are included in Other Assets on the Company’s balance
sheet at April 30, 2013.
NOTE O—QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
FISCAL 2013
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net sales
Gross profit
Income before income taxes
Net income
Earnings per share
Basic
Diluted
FISCAL 2012
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net sales
Gross profit
Loss before income taxes
Net loss
Loss per share
Basic
Diluted
7/31/12
10/31/12
1/31/13
4/30/13
$148,252
22,043
1,015
561
$
$
0.04
0.04
$159,760
24,794
3,371
1,950
$
$
0.13
0.13
$ 151,346
23,507
3,476
2,057
$
$
0.14
0.14
$171,079
32,312
8,878
5,190
$
$
0.36
0.35
7/31/11
10/31/11
1/31/12
4/30/12
$ 131,199
18,407
(3,908)
(2,716)
$
$
(0.19)
(0.19)
$ 128,418
16,114
(4,523)
(2,976)
$
$
(0.21)
(0.21)
$ 119,976
14,588
(15,653)
(9,114)
$
$
(0.63)
(0.63)
$ 136,221
17,366
(9,204)
(5,980)
$
$
(0.42)
(0.42)
44
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
report of independent registered public
accounting firm
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS OF AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
of American Woodmark Corporation and subsidiary (the Com-
to above present fairly, in all material respects the financial
pany), as of April 30, 2013 and 2012, and the related consoli-
position of American Woodmark Corporation and subsidiary
dated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss),
as of April 30, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations
shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in
and their cash flows for each of the years in the three year
the three year period ended April 30, 2013. These consolidated
period ended April 30, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
accepted accounting principles.
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
April 30, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
report dated June 28, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
financial reporting.
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Richmond, Virginia
June 28, 2013
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 45
management’s
report on internal control over financial reporting
Management has responsibility for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reason-
able assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting
purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control
over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2013.
In making its assessment, Management has utilized the criteria
set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework. Management concluded that based on its assess-
ment, American Woodmark Corporation’s internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of April 30, 2013. The
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of April 30,
2013, has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears
in this Annual Report to Shareholders.
Kent B. Guichard
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Jonathan H. Wolk
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
46
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
report
of independent registered public accounting firm—
internal control over financial reporting
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS OF AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION:
We have audited American Woodmark Corporation’s internal
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2013, based on
of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework,
account ing principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations
Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is
of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over finan-
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
cial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of inter-
of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
nal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Report-
ing. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over finan-
cial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compli-
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
ance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of inter-
nal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a mate-
rial weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures
In our opinion, American Woodmark Corporation maintained,
in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of April 30, 2013, based on criteria established in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accu-
rately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
consolidated balance sheets of American Woodmark Corporation
and subsidiary as of April 30, 2013 and 2012, and the related con-
solidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss),
shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended April 30, 2013 and our report dated
June 28, 2013 expressed an unqalified opinion on those consol-
idated financial statements.
Richmond, Virginia
June 28, 2013
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 47
stock
performance graph
Set forth below is a graph comparing the five-year cumulative
total shareholder return, including reinvestment of dividends,
from investing $100 on May 1, 2008 through April 30, 2013
in American Woodmark Corporation common stock, the
Russell 2000 Index and the S&P Household Durables Index:
COMPARATIVE FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURNS
$200.00
$150.00
$100.00
$50.00
$0.00
American Woodmark Corporation
Russell 2000 Index
S&P Household Durables Index
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30
48
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION ® 2013 ANNUAL REPORT
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
CORPORATE INFORMATION
ANNUAL MEETING
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders
of American Woodmark Corporation will be held
on Thursday, August 22, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. at the
Holiday Inn, 333 Front Royal Pike in Winchester,
Virginia.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2013,
may be obtained free of charge on the Company’s
Web site at www.americanwoodmark.com
or by writing:
Glenn Eanes
Vice President & Treasurer
American Woodmark Corporation
PO Box 1980
Winchester, VA 22604-8090
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
American Woodmark Corporation
3102 Shawnee Drive
Winchester, VA 22601-4208
(540) 665-9100
MAILING ADDRESS
PO Box 1980
Winchester, VA 22604-8090
TRANSFER AGENT
Registrar and Transfer Company
Investor Relations
(800) 368-5948
SHAREHOLDER INQUIRES
Investor Relations
American Woodmark Corporation
3102 Shawnee Drive
Winchester, VA 22601-4208
(540) 665-9100
www.americanwoodmark.com
Bradley S. Boyer
Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing Remodel
William F. Brandt, Jr.
Director;
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Andrew B. Cogan
Director;
Member of the Audit Committee
Chief Executive Officer of Knoll, Inc.
Martha M. Dally
Director;
Chair of the Governance Committee and
Member of the Compensation Committee
Retired Vice President Customer Development of Sara Lee Corporation
James G. Davis, Jr.
Director;
Member of the Audit Committee and
Member of the Governance Committee
President and Chief Executive Officer of James G. Davis Construction Corporation
S. Cary Dunston
Executive Vice President, Operations
Kent B. Guichard
Director;
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Daniel T. Hendrix
Director;
Chair of the Compensation Committee
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Interface, Inc.
Kent J. Hussey
Director;
Member of the Audit Committee and
Member of the Governance Committee
Retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Spectrum Brands, Inc.
Carol B. Moerdyk
Director;
Chair of the Audit Committee and
Member of the Governance Committee
Retired Senior Vice President, International, OfficeMax Incorporated
Vance W. Tang
Director;
Member of the Compensation Committee
Retired President and Chief Executive Officer of KONE Inc.
Jonathan H. Wolk
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
Corporate Secretary
American Woodmark™ is a trademark of American Woodmark Corporation.®
Printed in U.S.A. ©2013 American Woodmark Corporation®
Printed on recycled paper
m
o
c
.
p
u
o
r
g
e
v
i
t
a
e
r
c
x
i
n
e
o
h
p
w
w
w
.
,
p
u
o
r
G
e
v
i
t
a
e
r
C
x
i
n
e
o
h
P
y
b
n
g
i
s
e
D
3102 Shawnee Drive
Winchester, Virginia 22601-4208
(540) 665-9100
(540) 665-9176 Fax
www.americanwoodmark.com