REFLECTION
Connection
Our mIssION
Our ExpERIENCE ExpECTaTIONs
Our puRpOsE
Our VIsION
Our VaLuEs
THE amERIs
appROaCH
AnnuAl RepoRt 2014
HIgH pERFORmaNCE
Community Banking
aTTENTION
Respect TEamWORK
INTEgRITY
Honesty
High standards
understanding
pERsONaL
CORpORaTE CuLTuRE
Dear Shareholders:
With total assets reaching $4.0 billion, 2014 was another record year for our
Company. net earnings, exclusive of merger-related charges, totaled $41.0 million,
or $1.56 per share. profitability ratios improved as our operating return on assets
improved to 1.10% thanks to solid growth in loans and low cost deposits, stable net
interest margins and profitable sources of non-interest income, including results
from our mortgage operation. We closed, converted and integrated the Coastal
Bank acquisition during the second half of the year. lastly, the market value of our Company
reflected all of these successes and grew 29.6% during 2014 to $686.5 million at year end.
During the year, we launched The Ameris Approach, an internal branding effort to provide our
current and future employees with pinpoint clarity on our vision for Ameris Bank. We are not
casual about our culture or about the kind of Company we are building, and this effort will allow
us to quickly immerse newly hired employees and acquired institutions into our sales, customer
service and risk management culture.
Recent announcements include two pending acquisitions, expected to close in the summer of
2015: 18 branches in our existing Georgia and Florida footprint with approximately $800 million
in deposits, and a whole bank acquisition in Gainesville, Florida, involving a total of 13 branches.
A private placement of $120 million of Ameris Bancorp common stock was issued to support
these acquisitions. these announcements build on a great 2014 and bode well for our
expectations for 2015.
We are very grateful for the contribution of our outstanding employees and board members, and
for continued support and enthusiasm from all of our shareholders.
Respectfully,
edwin W. Hortman, Jr.
president and Chief executive officer
AnnuAl RepoR t 2014 | 3
DEFININg OuR CuLTuRE
Culture defines the nature of any organization, and it is built upon shared values,
attitudes, goals and practices. Culture also provides direction in an organization’s
approach to its customers, employees and shareholders and must be nurtured by
strategy and objectives.
the Ameris Bank culture is defined by The Ameris Approach, which clearly expresses
who we are as a company and encompasses all of the elements that make our
Company’s culture unique. The Ameris Approach provides guidance for the delivery
of high-performance banking services and one-of-a-kind, exceptional experiences to
the communities we serve.
the foundation of The Ameris Approach is comprised of four building blocks: our
Vision, our purpose, our experience expectations and our Values. these ideals
build on each other, providing guidance to Ameris Bank employees, and move us
closer to making our Mission a reality.
4 | AMeRiS BAnCoRp
THE amERIs appROaCH
The Ameris ApproAch is unique To Ameris BAnk. iT defines who we Are, inside And ouT.
OuR VIsION
Ameris Bank’s Vision moves us to achieving the best of both worlds: being both high-
performing and a community bank.
High performance is the foundation on which our one-of-a-kind exceptional
experience must rest. it is essential to maintaining our customers’ and shareholders’
trust and is crucial in instilling confidence in our employees. With a revenue increase
of 24%, growth of 10% in assets and a record 26% in noninterest bearing total
deposits, 2014 was a year of high performance. Ameris Bank witnessed outstanding
profitability across the mortgage, municipal and government guaranteed lending
divisions, and began the strategic expansion of wealth management and a new
construction and builder finance lending division, all while successfully completing
the 30th acquisition in our history.
Ameris Bank is a community bank, meaning our business is conducted on a personal
level. We are focused on building relationships with both families and businesses,
being active participants in our communities to provide solutions that address
individual needs, and searching for opportunities to improve the wellbeing of every
community we serve.
local businesses like Savannah Coffee Roasters help our communities thrive. Ameris
Bank Vp and Government Guaranteed lending Business Development officer
patton Dugas (left) provided owners lori and John Collins with the financing needed
for expansion, development of multi-lingual packaging and branding, and exporting
into international markets. this type of lending is available through Ameris Bank’s
preferred lender status with the Small Business Administration (SBA).
6 | AMeRiS BAnCoRp
OuR VIsION
Ameris BAnk will Be A high-performing communiTy BAnk
providing An excepTionAl cusTomer experience
wiTh well TrAined, empowered employees.
OuR puRpOsE
Ameris Bank’s purpose is found in the combination of high-performance and
community banking. By being a high-performing bank and treating our customers
like the neighbors they truly are, our employees help reduce customers’ concerns
and worry about banking, while providing financial peace of mind. offering financial
solutions with a focus on the customer experience, alongside our Company’s sound
business practices, disciplined leadership and financial stability, creates a positive
impact on the communities we serve.
SVp and Agriculture Banking Group Manager Frank Cox recognizes the importance
of speaking a common language to understand his customers’ goals, needs and
limitations. it is then that Frank can uniquely structure a loan or establish a checking
account, all according to individual resources and goals, or leverage our Farm
Services Agency (FSA) preferred lender status, the top status in the FSA guaranteed
loan program.
8 | AMeRiS BAnCoRp
OuR puRpOsE
The purpose of Ameris BAnk is To Bring finAnciAl peAce of mind
To our communiTies, one person AT A Time.
OuR ExpERIENCE ExpECTaTIONs
our experience expectations provide guidance on how our employees will interact
with each other and with our customers. By focusing on the same elements of
exceptional experiences, we are able to create consistent, exceptional service
across our entire organization. Ameris Bank delivers a one-of-a-kind exceptional
experience to each customer by offering our full attention, which allows us to
accurately understand our customers’ objectives and provide appropriate solutions
in a personal manner to accommodate their individual needs.
the Ameris Bank Mortgage Division is comprised of numerous positions and job
functions, strategically organized for the delivery of home financing. the home loan
process starts with relationship building and effective marketing; moving to pre-
qualification; then application, underwriting, booking and funding. ensuring each
phase is exceptionally executed is critical to success, and it is the responsibility of
each team member to authentically deliver an exceptional experience.
in 2014, the South Carolina Mortgage team, led by SVp and SC Mortgage
production Manager Steve Ray and supported by Mortgage Marketing
Representative Marlene Sheard, provided over $325 million in home loan financing
in the state of South Carolina. Additionally, the Columbia, South Carolina team was
ranked the number one provider of Residential Mortgage loans in the Columbia
MSA for 2014. this success is made possible by the team’s devotion to providing
exceptional experiences, and in large part anchored by the relationships formed with
leaders of the two largest home builders in the Columbia MSA, Ceo Steven Mungo
with Mungo Homes and Ceo Karl Haslinger with essex Homes.
10 | AMeRiS BAnCoRp
OuR ExpERIENCE
ExpECTaTIONs
Attention • UnderstAnding • PersonAl
OuR VaLuEs
our Values underscore how Ameris Bank performs as a bank every day. Regardless
of an employee’s role or location, these are the watchwords that streamline decisions
and dictate overall behavior.
each employee is encouraged to accomplish goals and make decisions while
consistently allowing integrity, respect, teamwork, honesty and high standards
be their guide. integrity is having strong moral principles and is vital in building
relationships. Respect is essential in our interactions in the relationships we build.
teamwork allows us to work together and collaborate, enabling us to quickly achieve
much more. Honesty is being fair, truthful and sincere, and is simply not negotiable.
High standards ensure the highest quality of actions in everything we do, helping
accomplish our goal of high performance.
the Ameris Bank Retail Administration Sales and Service System was introduced in
2014 to provide frontline retail employees with job–specific guidance for the delivery
of The Ameris Approach. this system promotes the development and execution
of all the key drivers for successful retail banking. our Values are foundational in
the development and advancement of our high–performing, exceptional sales and
service delivery.
12 | AMeRiS BAnCoRp
OuR VaLuEs
integrity • resPect • teAmwork • Honesty • HigH stAndArds
OuR mIssION
our Mission is a daily challenge and a statement which empowers our employees
to move together toward the same goals. Without Vision and Values, we are lost.
Without a purpose and a Mission, we are aimless. The Ameris Approach is the
uniting force in our direction as a company, and we strive to set out each day with
the same Vision, the same purpose, the same expectations for service and the same
Values to accomplish our Mission as a bank.
The Ameris Approach is the core of our culture and focuses on who we are, where
we are going and why. everything that is done, each decision that is made, each
action that is taken by our employees, Company leadership and Boards of Directors,
contributes to making Ameris Bank what it is today and how we will be tomorrow.
14 | AMeRiS BAnCoRp
OuR mIssION
The mission of Ameris BAnk is To Be A mAjor finAnciAl service provider
Through empowered employees creATing A posiTive communiTy impAcT
And delivering A compeTiTive shAreholder reTurn.
RECORD EaRNINgs IN 2014
REVENuE
our growth rates have attracted an audience, from interested investors to prospective employees
and potential acquisition targets. Growth rates in total assets, the market value of ABCB stock,
and even the pace at which we are building our customer base have been noteworthy. the growth
rate in our total revenue is the clearest sign that our Company’s growth strategies are successful
and on point. in 2014, total recurring revenue (excluding acquisition gains) increased to a record
$212.7 million, an increase of 30.7% from 2013. our bankers are competitive, with high energy
levels and an amazing entrepreneurial spirit. these qualities are resonating with customers and
position us to build even further on the record levels we saw in 2014.
LOaNs
in 2014, we grew non-covered loans to approximately $2.55 billion, an increase of 23.2%
compared to 2013. the growth was the result of several strategies, the most significant being
the successful acquisition of the Coastal Bank in June 2014. this acquisition provided $279.4
million in loans and added the critical mass we needed in Savannah, Georgia. in addition
to the growth we enjoyed from merger activity, we experienced robust growth in non-covered
loans in virtually all of our markets and in several lines of business, including mortgage wholesale
and municipal.
TaNgIBLE COmmON EquITY
Ameris Bancorp finished 2014 with approximately $294.2 million of tangible common equity and
$10.99 in tangible book value per common share. Growth rates relative to tangible equity have
benefitted from much higher profitability ratios and better utilization of capital achieved through
our recent merger activity. our recent acquisition announcements, coupled with the private
placement completed in January 2015, are expected to be accretive to tangible book value,
while providing a pathway to higher earnings and profitability in the coming years. Regardless
of economic conditions, capital strength is paramount to remaining offensive, and we believe in
differentiating ourselves through our manner of building and deploying capital.
16 | AMeRiS BAnCoRp
2010
$109,874
2011
2012
2013
2014
$139,464
$152,242
$162,734
$212,722
Net INterest INcome
Plus NoN-INterest INcome
(excludINg gaINs oN acquIsItIoNs)
(In thousands of dollars)
$1,929,748
2010
2011
$1,915,138
2012
2013
2014
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
$2,007,133
$2,524,722
$2,930,158
total loaNs
(In thousands of dollars)
$218,069
$238,837
$247,359
$247,641
$294,260
taNgIBle commoN equItY
(In thousands of dollars)
AnnuAl RepoR t 2014 | 17
amERIs BaNCORp
LEaDERsHIp
BOaRD OF DIRECTORs
Chairman
Daniel B. Jeter
Standard Discount Corporation
(Consumer Finance)
Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Ameris Bancorp
William I. Bowen, Jr.
Bowen-Donaldson Home for Funerals
(Funeral Services)
R. Dale Ezzell
Wisecards Printing
(Print Services)
J. Raymond Fulp
Harvey’s Pharmacy
(Pharmacy)
Leo J. Hill
Transamerica IDEX Mutual Funds
(Independent Director)
Robert P. Lynch
Lynch Management Company
(Automobile Sales)
Brooks Sheldon
Retired Banker
William H. Stern
Stern and Stern & Associates
(Real Estate)
Jimmy D. Veal
Beachview Event Rentals & Design
(Event Services)
18 | AMeRiS BAnCoRp
ExECuTIVE OFFICERs
Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Andrew B. Cheney
Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
Jon S. Edwards
Executive Vice President and
Chief Credit Officer
James A. LaHaise
Executive Vice President and
Commercial Banking Executive
Cindi H. Lewis
Executive Vice President,
Chief Administrative Officer
and Corporate Secretary
Stephen A. Melton
Executive Vice President and
Chief Risk Officer
Dennis J. Zember, Jr. CPA
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
AnnuAl RepoR t 2014 | 19
COmmuNITY BOaRDs OF DIRECTORs
Ameris Bank believes in the power of our communities. Volunteering our time and leadership
abilities in local civic and charitable organizations is important to the success of our markets and
positions us to benefit from business opportunities as they arise. this is a fundamental principle
woven within The Ameris Approach.
albany & Cordele, ga
Market president:
Calvin l. McMillan
Regional president:
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Directors:
Reid e. Mills, Chairman
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Bonny B. Dorough
Gregory R. Garland
Calvin l. McMillan
Y. Duncan Moore, Jr.
J. Austin turner
Cairo, ga
Market president:
Ronnie F. Marchant
Regional president:
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Directors:
Jeffrey F. Cox, Chairman
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Kevin S. Cauley
Cuy Harrell, iii
Ronnie F. Marchant
G. Ashley Register, M.D.
Donalsonville &
Colquitt, ga
Market president:
nancy S. Jernigan
Regional president:
James e. Creamer, Jr.
Directors:
n. ed King, Jr., Chairman
James e. Creamer, Jr.
D. Glenn Heard
nancy S. Jernigan
Kenneth R. Massey
Dan e. ponder, Jr.
Danny S. Shepard
Directors Emeritus:
H. Wayne Carr
John B. Clarke, Sr.
Joseph S. Hall
Jerry G. Mitchell
Dothan, aL
Market president:
Harris o. pittman, iii
Regional president:
James e. Creamer, Jr.
Directors:
R. Dale ezzell, Chairman
James e. Creamer, Jr.
Robert e. Crowder
Ronald e. Dean
John D. Deloach
Jerry l. Gulledge, Market
president (eufaula)
C. phillip Hayes
Harris o. pittman, iii
Alan Wells
Douglas, ga
Market president:
David B. Batchelor
Regional president:
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Directors:
Donnie H. Smith, Chairman
lawton e. Bassett, iii
David B. Batchelor
Kevin l. Gilliard
Faye H. Hennesy
Alfred lott, Jr.
Jacksonville, FL
Market president:
Cecil Gibson
Regional president:
James e. Creamer, Jr.
Directors:
Joseph p. Helow, Chairman
Robert M. Bradley, Jr.
James e. Creamer, Jr.
phillip H. Cury
Cecil Gibson
Major B. Harding, Jr.
Robert l. Jones, iii
Robert p. lynch
J. Charles Wilson, C.p.A.
south Carolina
Regional president:
H. Richard Sturm
Directors:
William H. Stern, Chairman
Kirkman Finlay, iii
edward G. McDonnell
William Weston J. newton
A. Rae phillips
H. Richard Sturm
southeast georgia Coast
Market president:
Michael D. Hodges
Regional president:
James e. Creamer, Jr.
Directors:
Jimmy D. Veal, Chairman
James e. Creamer, Jr.
Michael l. Davis
Michael D. Hodges
Stephen V. Kinney
John W. McDill
G. tony Sammons
Directors Emeritus:
C. Ray Acosta
thomas i. Stafford, Jr.
J. thomas Whelchel
st. augustine, FL
Market president:
Christopher J. Kamienski
Regional president:
James e. Creamer, Jr.
Directors:
Mark F. Bailey, Sr.,
Chairman
Matthew e. Baker
James e. Creamer, Jr.
Christopher J. Kamienski
David e. lee
tracy W. upchurch
Director Emeritus:
Melvin A. McQuaig
moultrie, ga
Market president:
Ronnie F. Marchant
Regional president:
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Directors:
Brooks Sheldon, Chairman
lawton e. Bassett, iii
thomas l. estes, M.D.
Robert A. Faircloth
R. plenn Hunnicutt
Daniel B. Jeter
lynn l. Jones, Jr.
Ronnie F. Marchant
J. Mark Mobley, Jr.
thomas W. Rowell
Ocilla, ga
Market president:
Michael A. Johnson
Regional president:
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Directors:
Gary H. paulk, Chairman
lawton e. Bassett, iii
David B. Batchelor, Market
president (Douglas)
Michael A. Johnson
Howard C. McMahan, M.D.
Wesley t. paulk
Directors Emeritus:
Wycliffe Griffin
loran A. pate
Daniel M. paulk
savannah, ga
Market president:
Austen D. Carroll
Regional president:
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Directors:
Matthew A. West,
Chairman
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Austen D. Carroll
nina t. Gompels
J. Mason Heidt, CltC
thomas lawhorne, iii, ph.D.
Christopher J. peters
20 | AMeRiS BAnCoRp
COmmuNITY BOaRDs OF DIRECTORs
Tifton, ga
Market president:
Charles t. Bargeron, iii
Regional president:
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Directors:
J. Raymond Fulp,
Chairman
Charles t. Bargeron, iii
lawton e. Bassett, iii
William i. Bowen, Jr.
Austin l. Coarsey
John Alan lindsey
Fortson B. turner
Clifford A. Walker, Sr.,
D.M.D.
Tallahassee, FL
Market president:
Robert D. Vice
Regional president:
James e. Creamer, Jr.
Directors:
Halsey Beshears
James e. Creamer, Jr.
Hector Mejia, M.D.
Ruben R. Rowe, iii
Robert D. Vice
Thomasville, ga
Market president:
Ronnie F. Marchant
Regional president:
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Directors:
l. Maurice Chastain,
Chairman
Dale e. Aldridge
lawton e. Bassett, iii
S. Mark Brewer, M.D.
Kenneth e. Hickey
Ronnie F. Marchant
terrel M. Solana, ph.D.
Trenton, FL
Market president:
Michael e. Mcelroy
Vidalia, ga
Market president:
John A. tyson
Regional president:
James e. Creamer, Jr.
Regional president:
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Directors:
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Stewart A. Hamilton,
D.M.D.
Christopher A. Hopkins
pollyann F. Martin
Jeffery S. Mclain
John A. tyson
Directors:
Doug Crawford, Chairman
James e. Creamer, Jr.
Adra B. Kennard
Michael e. Mcelroy
Kelly J. philman
Valdosta, ga
Market president:
Michael t. lee
Regional president:
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Directors:
Charles e. Smith,
Chairman
lawton e. Bassett, iii
Michael t. lee
Bart t. Mizell
M. Alan Wheeler
t. eddie York
Directors Emeritus:
Doyle Weltzbarker
Henry C. Wortman
FRoM leFt to RiGHt: MoRtGAGe unDeRWRiteR StACie RiDDle AnD MoRtGAGe BRAnCH MAnAGeR Joe HunteR, AlonG WitH otHeR
MeMBeRS oF tHe MARiettA, GeoRGiA, MoRtGAGe teAM VolunteeReD on A BuilDinG Site FoR HABitAt FoR HuMAnitY. pRouDlY
RepReSentinG AMeRiS BAnK in tHe BeAuFoRt, SoutH CARolinA, WAteR FeStiVAl pARADe ARe HeAD telleR KiRK DeHAAn, BRAnCH MAnAGeR
liz BRoWn, telleRS JAnet HARteR AnD eRin GolDen, AnD peRSonAl BAnKeR KiMBeRlY SiMS AlonG WitH FAMilY AnD FRienDS. oRMonD
BeACH, FloRiDA, BRAnCH MAnAGeR CARlene DeSpARD VolunteeRS tiMe DuRinG tHe VoluSiA CountY CHilDHooD CAnCeR FounDAtion
“BACK to SCHool” CooKout in DelAnD, FloRiDA. oCtoBeR MARKeD tHe 5tH AnnuAl HelpinG FiGHt HunGeR BAnK-WiDe FooD DRiVe. A
$100,000 BAnCoRp DonAtion AlonG WitH oVeR 768,400 iteMS ColleCteD WeRe DonAteD to loCAl FooD BAnKS ACRoSS ouR CoMpAnY’S
FootpRint. DotHAn, AlABAMA, telleR AMAnDA CRuM AnD BRAnCH MAnAGeR linDA WARD ARe AMonG tHe MoRe tHAn 1,000 ColleAGueS
WHo MAKe tHiS AnnuAl initiAtiVe SuCCeSSFul.
AnnuAl RepoR t 2014 | 21
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking StatementsThis Annual Report contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “anticipate” and similar expressions and variations thereof identify certain of such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates which they were made. Ameris Bancorp undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. FORm 10-K
AnnuAl RepoRt 2014
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-K
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
FORM 10-K
ACT OF 1934
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, or
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, or
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number
001-13901
Commission File Number
001-13901
AMERIS BANCORP
AMERIS BANCORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
58-1456434
(IRS Employer ID No.)
GEORGIA
(State of incorporation)
GEORGIA
(State of incorporation)
310 FIRST ST., SE, MOULTRIE, GA 31768
(Address of principal executive offices)
58-1456434
(IRS Employer ID No.)
(229) 890-1111
310 FIRST ST., SE, MOULTRIE, GA 31768
(Registrant’s telephone number)
(Address of principal executive offices)
(229) 890-1111
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, Par Value $1 Per Share
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, Par Value $1 Per Share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act. Yes No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
Act. Yes No
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No
amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
Large accelerated filer
company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Non-accelerated filer
Large accelerated filer
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act). Yes No
Non-accelerated filer
As of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting
common equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was approximately $387.4 million.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act). Yes No
As of February 28, 2015, the registrant had outstanding 32,205,776 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share.
As of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting
common equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was approximately $387.4 million.
Smaller reporting company
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Accelerated filer
As of February 28, 2015, the registrant had outstanding 32,205,776 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share.
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated into Part III hereof by reference.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated into Part III hereof by reference.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
AMERIS BANCORP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. Business
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Page
1
17
24
24
24
24
25
27
29
55
55
55
55
55
56
56
56
56
56
57
CAUTIONARY NOTICE
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”) under the caption “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and elsewhere, including information incorporated herein by reference
to other documents, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of, and subject to the protections of, Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”).
Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations,
assumptions, estimates, intentions and future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many
of which may be beyond our control and which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Ameris Bancorp to be
materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be forward-looking statements. You can identify these
forward-looking statements through our use of words such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “should,” “indicate,” “would,”
“believe,” “contemplate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “plan,” “point to,” “project,” “predict,” “could,” “intend,” “target,”
“potential” and other similar words and expressions of the future. These forward-looking statements may not be realized due to a variety
of factors, including, without limitation, those described in Part I, Item 1A., “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this report and those
described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Exchange
Act.
All written or oral forward-looking statements that are made by or are attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this
cautionary notice. Our forward-looking statements apply only as of the date of this Annual Report or the respective date of the document
from which they are incorporated herein by reference. We have no obligation and do not undertake to update, revise or correct any of
the forward-looking statements after the date of this Annual Report, or after the respective dates on which such statements otherwise
are made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
PART I
As used in this Annual Report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “Ameris” and the “Company” refer to Ameris Bancorp and its subsidiaries
(unless the context indicates another meaning).
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
We are a financial holding company whose business is conducted primarily through our wholly owned banking subsidiary, Ameris Bank
(the “Bank”), which provides a full range of banking services to its retail and commercial customers who are primarily concentrated in
select markets in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina. Ameris was incorporated on December 18, 1980 as a Georgia
corporation. The Company’s executive office is located at 310 First St., S.E., Moultrie, Georgia 31768, our telephone number is
(229) 890-1111 and our internet address is www.amerisbank.com. We operate 73 domestic banking offices with no foreign activities. At
December 31, 2014, we had approximately $4.04 billion in total assets, $2.93 billion in total loans, $3.43 billion in total deposits and
stockholders’ equity of $366.0 million. Our deposits are insured, up to applicable limits, by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(the “FDIC”).
We make our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those
reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act available free of charge on our website at
www.amerisbank.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the SEC. These reports are also
available without charge on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
The Parent Company
Our primary business as a bank holding company is to manage the business and affairs of the Bank. As a bank holding company, we
perform certain shareholder and investor relations functions and seek to provide financial support, if necessary, to the Bank.
1
Ameris Bank
Our principal subsidiary is the Bank, which is headquartered in Moultrie, Georgia and operates branches primarily concentrated in select
markets in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina. These branches serve distinct communities in our business areas with
autonomy but do so as one bank, leveraging our favorable geographic footprint in an effort to acquire more customers.
Capital Trust Securities
On September 20, 2006, the Company completed a private placement of an aggregate of $36 million of trust preferred securities. The
placement occurred through a statutory trust subsidiary of Ameris, Ameris Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”). The trust preferred securities
carry a quarterly adjustable interest rate of 1.63% over the 3-Month LIBOR. The trust preferred securities mature on December 15,
2036, and became redeemable at the Company’s option on September 15, 2011.
On December 16, 2005, Ameris acquired First National Banc, Inc. (“FNB”) by merger. In connection with this transaction, Ameris
assumed the obligations of FNB related to its prior issuance of trust preferred securities. In 2004, FNB’s statutory trust subsidiary, First
National Banc Statutory Trust I, issued $5,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-
Month LIBOR plus 2.80% through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. These trust preferred securities have a maturity of 30
years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date.
On December 23, 2013, Ameris acquired The Prosperity Banking Company (“Prosperity”) by merger. In connection with this
transaction, Ameris assumed the obligations of Prosperity related to the following issuances of trust preferred securities: (i) in 2003,
Prosperity’s statutory trust subsidiary, Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust II, issued $4,500,000 in principal amount of trust preferred
securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 3.15%; (ii) in 2004, Prosperity’s statutory trust subsidiary, Prosperity
Banking Capital Trust 1, issued $5,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 90-Day
LIBOR plus 2.57%; (iii) in 2006, Prosperity’s statutory trust subsidiary, Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust III, issued $10,000,000 in
principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 90-Day LIBOR plus 1.60%; and (iv) in 2007, Prosperity’s
statutory trust subsidiary, Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust IV, issued $10,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a
rate per annum equal to the 90-Day LIBOR plus 1.54%. Each of the foregoing issuances was consummated through a pool sponsored
by a national brokerage firm. These trust preferred securities have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option
on any quarterly interest payment date.
On June 30, 2014, Ameris acquired Coastal Bankshares, Inc. (“Coastal”) by merger. In connection with such transaction, Ameris
assumed the obligations of Coastal related to the following issuances of trust preferred securities: (i) in 2003, Coastal’s statutory trust
subsidiary, Coastal Bankshares Statutory Trust I, issued $5,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum
equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 3.15%; and (ii) in 2005, Coastal’s statutory trust subsidiary, Coastal Bankshares Statutory Trust II,
issued $10,000,000 in principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus 1.60%. Each
of the foregoing issuances was consummated through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. These trust preferred securities
have a maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date.
See the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report for a further discussion of these trust preferred
securities.
Strategy
We seek to increase our presence and grow the “Ameris” brand in the markets that we currently serve in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and
South Carolina and in neighboring communities that present attractive opportunities for expansion. Management has pursued this
objective through an acquisition-oriented growth strategy and a prudent operating strategy. Our community banking philosophy
emphasizes personalized service and building broad and deep customer relationships, which has provided us with a substantial base of
low cost core deposits. Our markets are managed by senior level, experienced decision makers in a decentralized structure that
differentiates us from our larger competitors. Management believes that this structure, along with involvement in and knowledge of our
local markets, will continue to provide growth and assist in managing risk throughout our Company.
We have maintained our focus on a long-term strategy of expanding and diversifying our franchise in terms of revenues, profitability
and asset size. Our growth over the past several years has been enhanced significantly by bank acquisitions, including the acquisitions
of Coastal in 2014, Prosperity in 2013 and ten failed institutions in FDIC-assisted transactions between 2009 and 2012. We expect to
continue to take advantage of the consolidation in the financial services industry and enhance our franchise through future
acquisitions. We intend to grow within our existing markets, to branch into or acquire financial institutions in existing markets as well
as financial institutions in other markets consistent with our capital availability and management abilities.
2
BANKING SERVICES
Lending Activities
General. The Company maintains a diversified loan portfolio by providing a broad range of commercial and retail lending services to
business entities and individuals. We provide agricultural loans, commercial business loans, commercial and residential real estate
construction and mortgage loans, consumer loans, revolving lines of credit and letters of credit. The Company also originates first
mortgage residential mortgage loans and generally enters into a commitment to sell these loans in the secondary market. We have not
made or participated in foreign, energy-related or subprime type loans. In addition, the Company does not buy loan participations or
portions of national credits but from time to time, may acquire balances subject to participation agreements through acquisition.
Excluding covered loans, less than 1% of the Company’s loan portfolio was a loan participation purchased at December 31, 2014 and
2013.
At December 31, 2014, our loan portfolio totaled approximately $2.93 billion, representing approximately 72.6% of our total assets. For
additional discussion of our loan portfolio, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations – Loans.”
Commercial Real Estate Loans. This portion of our loan portfolio has grown significantly over the past few years and represents the
largest segment of our loan portfolio. These loans are generally extended for acquisition, development or construction of commercial
properties. The loans are underwritten with an emphasis on the viability of the project, the borrower’s ability to meet certain minimum
debt service requirements and an analysis and review of the collateral and guarantors, if any.
Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans. Ameris originates adjustable and fixed-rate residential mortgage loans. These mortgage loans
are generally originated under terms and conditions consistent with secondary market guidelines. Some of these loans will be placed in
the Company’s loan portfolio; however, a majority are sold in the secondary market. The residential real estate mortgage loans that are
included in the Company’s loan portfolio are usually owner-occupied and generally amortized over a 10- to 20-year period with three-
to five-year maturity or repricing.
Agricultural Loans. Our agricultural loans are extended to finance crop production, the purchase of farm-related equipment or farmland
and the operations of dairies, poultry producers, livestock producers and timber growers. Agricultural loans typically involve seasonal
balance fluctuations. Although we typically look to an agricultural borrower’s cash flow as the principal source of repayment,
agricultural loans are also generally secured by a security interest in the crops or the farm-related equipment and, in some cases, an
assignment of crop insurance and mortgage on real estate. The lending officer visits the borrower regularly during the growing season
and re-evaluates the loan in light of the borrower’s updated cash flow projections. A portion of our agricultural loans is guaranteed by
the Farm Service Agency Guaranteed Loan Program.
Commercial and Industrial Loans. Generally, commercial and industrial loans consist of loans made primarily to manufacturers,
wholesalers and retailers of goods, service companies, municipalities and other industries. These loans are made for acquisition,
expansion and working capital purposes and may be secured by real estate, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, personal
guarantees or other assets. The Company monitors these loans by requesting submission of corporate and personal financial statements
and income tax returns. The Company has also generated loans which are guaranteed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (the
“SBA”). SBA loans are generally underwritten in the same manner as conventional loans generated for the Bank’s portfolio. Periodically,
a portion of the loans that are secured by the guaranty of the SBA will be sold in the secondary market. Management believes that
making such loans helps the local community and also provides Ameris with a source of income and solid future lending relationships
as such businesses grow and prosper. The primary repayment risk for commercial loans is the failure of the business due to economic
or financial factors.
Consumer Loans. Our consumer loans include motor vehicle, home improvement, home equity, student and signature loans and small
personal credit lines. The terms of these loans typically range from 12 to 60 months and vary based upon the nature of collateral and
size of the loan. These loans are generally secured by various assets owned by the consumer.
Credit Administration
We have sought to maintain a comprehensive lending policy that meets the credit needs of each of the communities served by the Bank,
including low and moderate-income customers, and to employ lending procedures and policies consistent with this approach. All loans
are subject to our corporate loan policy, which is reviewed annually and updated as needed. The loan policy provides that lending
officers have sole authority to approve loans of various amounts commensurate with their seniority, experience and needs within the
market. Our local market Presidents have discretion to approve loans in varying principal amounts up to established limits, and our
regional credit officers review and approve loans that exceed such limits.
3
Individual lending authority is assigned by the Company’s Chief Credit Officer, as is the maximum limit of new extensions of credit
that may be approved in each market. These approval limits are reviewed annually by the Company and adjusted as needed. All requests
for extensions of credit in excess of any of these limits are reviewed by one of five regional credit officers. When the request for approval
exceeds the authority level of the regional credit officer, the approval of the Company’s Chief Credit Officer and/or the Company’s loan
committee are required. All new loans or modifications to existing loans in excess of $250,000 are reviewed monthly by the Company’s
credit administration department with the lender responsible for the credit. In addition, our ongoing loan review program subjects the
portfolio to sampling and objective review by our monthly internal loan review process which is independent of the originating loan
officer, or by our independent external loan review firm.
Each lending officer has authority to make loans only in the market area in which his or her Bank office is located and its contiguous
counties. Occasionally, our loan committee will approve making a loan outside of the market areas of the Bank, provided the Bank has
a prior relationship with the borrower. Our lending policy requires analysis of the borrower’s projected cash flow and ability to service
the debt.
We actively market our services to qualified lending customers in both the commercial and consumer sectors. Our commercial lending
officers actively solicit the business of new companies entering the market as well as longstanding members of that market’s business
community. Through personalized professional service and competitive pricing, we have been successful in attracting new commercial
lending customers. At the same time, we actively advertise our consumer loan products and continually seek to make our lending officers
more accessible.
The Bank continually monitors its loan portfolio to identify areas of concern and to enable management to take corrective action when
necessary. Local market Presidents and lending officers meet periodically to review all past due loans, the status of large loans and
certain other credit or economic related matters. Individual lending officers are responsible for collection of past due amounts and
monitoring any changes in the financial status of the borrowers.
Investment Activities
Our investment policy is designed to maximize income from funds not needed to meet loan demand in a manner consistent with
appropriate liquidity and risk management objectives. Under this policy, our Company may invest in federal, state and municipal
obligations, corporate obligations, public housing authority bonds, industrial development revenue bonds, securities issued by
Government-Sponsored Enterprises (“GSEs”) and satisfactorily-rated trust preferred obligations. Investments in our portfolio must
satisfy certain quality criteria. Our Company’s investments must be “investment-grade” as determined by either Moody’s or Standard
and Poor’s. Investment securities where the Company has determined a certain level of credit risk are periodically reviewed to determine
the financial condition of the issuer and to support the Company’s decision to continue holding the security. Our Company may purchase
non-rated municipal bonds only if the issuer of such bonds is located in the Company’s general market area and such bonds are
determined by the Company to have a credit risk no greater than the minimum ratings referred to above. Industrial development authority
bonds, which normally are not rated, are purchased only if the issuer is located in the Company’s market area and if the bonds are
considered to possess a high degree of credit soundness. Traditionally, the Company has purchased and held investment securities with
very high levels of credit quality, favoring investments backed by direct or indirect guarantees of the U.S. Government.
While our investment policy permits our Company to trade securities to improve the quality of yields or marketability or to realign the
composition of the portfolio, the Bank historically has not done so to any significant extent.
Our investment committee implements the investment policy and portfolio strategies and monitors the portfolio. Reports on all
purchases, sales, net profits or losses and market appreciation or depreciation of the bond portfolio are reviewed by our Board of
Directors each month. The written investment policy is reviewed annually by the Company’s Board of Directors and updated as needed.
The Company’s securities are held in safekeeping accounts at approved correspondent banks.
Deposits
The Company provides a full range of deposit accounts and services to both retail and commercial customers. These deposit accounts
have a variety of interest rates and terms and consist of interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing accounts, including commercial and
retail checking accounts, regular interest-bearing savings accounts, money market accounts, individual retirement accounts and
certificates of deposit. Our Bank obtains most of its deposits from individuals and businesses in its market areas.
Brokered time deposits are deposits obtained by utilizing an outside broker that is paid a fee. The Bank utilizes brokered deposits to
accomplish several purposes, such as (i) acquiring a certain maturity and dollar amount without repricing the Bank’s current customers
which could increase or decrease the overall cost of deposits and (ii) acquiring certain maturities and dollar amounts to help manage
interest rate risk.
4
Other Funding Sources
The Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) allows the Company to obtain advances through its credit program. These advances are secured
by securities owned by the Company and held in safekeeping by the FHLB, FHLB stock owned by the Company and certain qualifying
residential mortgages.
The Company also enters into repurchase agreements. These repurchase agreements are treated as short-term borrowings and are
reflected on the Company’s balance sheet as such.
Use of Derivatives
The Company seeks to provide a stable net interest income despite changes in interest rates. In its review of interest rate risk, the
Company considers the use of derivatives to protect interest income on loans or to create a structure in institutional borrowings that
limits the Company’s cost. During 2013 and 2014, the Company had an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $37.1 million for
the purpose of converting from a variable to a fixed interest rate on the junior subordinated debentures on the Company’s balance sheet.
The interest rate swap, which is classified as a cash flow hedge, is indexed to LIBOR.
Additionally, the Company maintains a risk management program to manage interest rate risk and pricing risk associated with its
mortgage lending activities. This program includes the use of forward contracts and other derivatives that are used to offset changes in
the value of the mortgage inventory due to changes in market interest rates. As a normal part of its operations, the Company enters into
derivative contracts such as forward sale commitments and interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”) to economically hedge risks
associated with overall price risk related to IRLCs and mortgage loans held for sale carried at fair value. The fair value of these
instruments amounted to an asset of approximately $1,180,000 and $1,757,000 at December 31, 2013 and 2014, respectively.
CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING AND BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Merchants & Southern Banks of Florida, Inc.
On January 28, 2015, Ameris entered into an agreement to purchase Merchants & Southern Banks of Florida, Inc. (“Merchants”), the
holding company of Merchants & Southern Bank. Merchants is headquartered in Gainesville, Florida and it operates thirteen banking
locations in Alachua, Marion and Clay Counties in Florida. The consideration for the acquisition and aggregate purchase price is $50.0
million. As of December 31, 2014, Merchants reported assets of $473 million, gross loans of $214 million and deposits of $336 million.
The transaction is expected to close during the second quarter of 2015 and is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory
approvals.
Acquisition of 18 Branches in North Florida and South Georgia
On January 28, 2015, Ameris entered into an agreement to purchase certain fixed assets and assume the deposits of eighteen branches
from Bank of America Corporation. Ten of the branches are located in South Georgia and will add an estimated $424 million of deposits,
while eight of the branches are located in North Florida and will contribute an estimated $388 million of deposits. The transaction is
expected to close during the second quarter of 2015 and is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals.
Coastal Bankshares, Inc.
On June 30, 2014, Ameris acquired Coastal by merger, at which time Coastal’s wholly owned banking subsidiary, The Coastal Bank
(“Coastal Bank”), also was merged with and into the Bank. Coastal was headquartered in Savannah, Georgia and it operated six banking
locations in Chatham, Liberty and Effingham Counties in Georgia. The acquisition of Coastal grew the Company’s existing market
presence in the Savannah, Georgia market. The consideration for the acquisition was our common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the
“Common Stock”), with an aggregate purchase price of approximately $37.3 million. The total consideration consisted of approximately
1,599,000 shares of Common Stock with a value of approximately $34.5 million and $2.8 million cash in exchange for outstanding
warrants.
The Prosperity Banking Company
On December 23, 2013, Ameris acquired Prosperity by merger, at which time Prosperity’s wholly owned banking subsidiary, Prosperity
Bank (“Prosperity Bank”), also was merged with and into the Bank. Prosperity was headquartered in Saint Augustine, Florida and it
operated 12 banking locations in St. Johns, Duval, Flagler, Bay, Putnam and Volusia Counties in northeast Florida and the Florida
panhandle. The acquisition of Prosperity was significant to the Company, as it expanded our existing Southeastern footprint in several
attractive Florida markets. The consideration for the acquisition was a combination of cash and our Common Stock, with an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $24.6 million. The total consideration consisted of $162,000 in cash and approximately 1,169,000
shares of Common Stock with a value of approximately $24.5 million.
5
Montgomery Bank & Trust
On July 6, 2012, the Bank purchased certain assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of Montgomery Bank & Trust (“MBT”)
from the FDIC, as Receiver of MBT. MBT operated two branches in Ailey and Vidalia, Georgia. The Bank assumed approximately
$156.7 million in customer deposits and acquired approximately $18.1 million in assets, including approximately $16.7 million in cash
and cash equivalents and approximately $1.2 million in deposit-secured loans. The assets were acquired without a discount and the
deposits were assumed with no premium. To settle the transaction, the FDIC made a cash payment to the Bank totaling approximately
$138.7 million, based on the differential between liabilities assumed and assets acquired.
Central Bank of Georgia
On February 24, 2012, the Bank purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of Central Bank
of Georgia (“CBG”) from the FDIC, as Receiver of CBG. CBG operated five branches in Ellaville, Buena Vista, Butler, Cusseta and
Macon, Georgia, with approximately $182.6 million in loans and approximately $261.0 million in deposits. The Company’s agreements
with the FDIC included a loss-sharing agreement which affords the Bank significant protection from losses associated with loans and
other real estate owned (“OREO”). Under the terms of the loss-sharing agreement, the FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and share 80%
of loss recoveries during the term of the agreement. The term for loss sharing on residential real estate loans is ten years, while the term
for loss sharing on all other loans is five years.
The Company’s bid to acquire CBG included a discount on the book value of the assets totaling $33.9 million. The bid resulted in a
cash payment from the FDIC totaling $31.9 million.
High Trust Bank
On July 15, 2011, the Bank purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of High Trust Bank
(“HTB”) from the FDIC, as Receiver of HTB. HTB operated two branches in Stockbridge and Leary, Georgia, with approximately
$133.5 million in loans and approximately $175.9 million in deposits. The Company’s agreements with the FDIC included a loss-sharing
agreement which affords the Bank significant protection from losses associated with loans and OREO. Under the terms of the loss-
sharing agreement, the FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and share 80% of loss recoveries during the term of the agreement. The term for
loss sharing on residential real estate loans is ten years, while the term for loss sharing on all other loans is five years.
The Company’s bid to acquire HTB included a discount on the book value of the assets totaling $33.5 million. The bid resulted in a cash
payment from the FDIC totaling $30.2 million.
One Georgia Bank
On July 15, 2011, the Bank purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of One Georgia Bank
(“OGB”) from the FDIC, as Receiver of OGB. OGB operated one branch in Midtown Atlanta, Georgia, with approximately $120.8
million in loans and approximately $136.1 million in deposits. The Company’s agreements with the FDIC included a loss-sharing
agreement which affords the Bank significant protection from losses associated with loans and OREO. Under the terms of the loss-
sharing agreement, the FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and share 80% of loss recoveries during the term of the agreement. The term for
loss sharing on residential real estate loans is ten years, while the term for loss sharing on all other loans is five years.
The Company’s bid to acquire OGB included a discount on the book value of the assets totaling $22.5 million. The bid resulted in a
cash payment to the FDIC totaling $5.7 million.
Tifton Banking Company
On November 12, 2010, the Bank purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of Tifton
Banking Company (“TBC”) from the FDIC, as Receiver of TBC. TBC operated one branch in Tifton, Georgia, with approximately
$118.4 million in loans and approximately $132.9 million in deposits. The Company’s agreements with the FDIC included a loss-sharing
agreement which affords the Bank significant protection from losses associated with loans and OREO. Under the terms of the loss-
sharing agreement, the FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and share 80% of loss recoveries during the term of the agreement. The term for
loss sharing on residential real estate loans is ten years, while the term for loss sharing on all other loans is five years.
The Company’s acquisition of TBC resulted in the Bank recording $956,000 of goodwill related to the purchase. The bid resulted in a
cash payment to the FDIC totaling $10.3 million to settle the transaction.
6
Darby Bank & Trust Co.
On November 12, 2010, the Bank purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of Darby
Bank & Trust Co. (“DBT”) from the FDIC, as Receiver of DBT. DBT operated seven branches in Vidalia, Lyons, Savannah and Pooler,
Georgia, with approximately $393.3 million in loans and approximately $387.0 million in deposits. The Company’s agreements with
the FDIC included a loss-sharing agreement which affords the Bank significant protection from losses associated with loans and
OREO. The loss sharing agreements for residential real estate loans and for all other loans are separately structured with reimbursement
percentages dependent on the losses incurred under the specific agreement. Under the residential real estate agreement, losses up to $8.4
million are reimbursed at 80%, losses between $8.4 million and $11.8 million are reimbursed at 30%, and losses in excess of $11.8
million are reimbursed at 80%. Under the all other agreement, losses up to $123.4 million are reimbursed at 80%, losses between $123.4
million and $181.3 million are reimbursed at 30%, and losses in excess of $181.3 million are reimbursed at 80%. The term for loss
sharing on residential real estate loans is ten years, while the term for loss sharing on all other loans is five years.
The Company’s bid to acquire DBT included a discount on the book value of the assets totaling $45.0 million. The bid resulted in a cash
payment to the FDIC totaling $149.9 million.
First Bank of Jacksonville
On October 22, 2010, the Bank purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of First Bank of
Jacksonville (“FBJ”) from the FDIC, as Receiver of FBJ. FBJ operated two branches in Jacksonville, Florida, with approximately $51.1
million in loans and approximately $71.9 million in deposits. The Company’s agreements with the FDIC included a loss-sharing
agreement which affords the Bank significant protection from losses associated with loans and OREO. Under the terms of the loss-
sharing agreement, the FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and share 80% of loss recoveries during the term of the agreement. The term for
loss sharing on residential real estate loans is ten years, while the term for loss sharing on all other loans is five years.
The Company’s bid to acquire FBJ included a discount on the book value of the assets totaling $4.8 million. The bid resulted in a cash
payment from the FDIC totaling $8.1 million.
Satilla Community Bank
On May 14, 2010, the Bank purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of Satilla Community
Bank (“SCB”) from the FDIC, as Receiver of SCB. SCB operated one branch in St. Marys, Georgia, the southernmost city on the
Georgia coast and a northern suburb of Jacksonville, Florida, with approximately $68.8 million in loans and approximately $75.5 million
in deposits. The Company’s agreements with the FDIC included a loss-sharing agreement which affords the Bank significant protection
from losses associated with loans and OREO. Under the terms of the loss-sharing agreement, the FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and
share 80% of loss recoveries during the term of the agreement. The term for loss sharing on residential real estate loans is ten years,
while the term for loss sharing on all other loans is five years.
The Company’s bid to acquire SCB included a discount on the book value of the assets totaling $14.4 million. Also included in the bid
was a premium of approximately $92,000 on SCB’s deposits. Because SCB’s brokered deposits did not pass to the Bank, the acquisition
resulted in significantly more assets being purchased than liabilities assumed. As a result, the Bank made a cash payment to the FDIC
totaling $35.7 million to settle the transaction.
United Security Bank
On November 6, 2009, the Bank purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of United Security
Bank (“USB”) from the FDIC, as Receiver of USB. USB operated one branch in Woodstock, Georgia and one branch in Sparta, Georgia,
with total loans of approximately $108.4 million and approximately $141.1 million of total deposits. The Company’s agreements with
the FDIC included a loss-sharing agreement which affords the Bank significant protection from losses associated with loans and OREO.
Under the terms of the loss-sharing agreement the FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and share 80% of loss recoveries on the first $46
million of losses and absorb 95% of losses and share in 95% of loss recoveries on losses exceeding $46 million. The term for loss sharing
on residential real estate loans is ten years, while the term for loss sharing on all other loans is five years.
The Company’s bid to acquire USB included a discount on the book value of the assets totaling $32.6 million. Also included in the bid
was a premium of approximately $228,000 on USB’s deposits. The bid resulted in a cash payment from the FDIC totaling $24.2 million.
7
American United Bank
On October 23, 2009, the Bank purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of American
United Bank (“AUB”) from the FDIC, as Receiver of AUB. AUB operated only one branch in Lawrenceville, Georgia, a northeast
suburb of Atlanta, Georgia, with approximately $85.7 million in loans and approximately $100.5 million in deposits. The Company’s
agreements with the FDIC included a loss-sharing agreement which affords the Bank significant protection from losses associated with
loans and OREO. Under the terms of the loss-sharing agreement, the FDIC will absorb 80% of losses and share 80% of loss recoveries
on the first $38 million of losses and absorb 95% of losses and share in 95% of loss recoveries on losses exceeding $38 million. The
loss sharing agreement for residential real estate loans was terminated in 2012 with two remaining loans. The loss sharing agreement on
all other loans remains in place and is for five years.
The Company’s bid to acquire AUB included a discount on the book value of the assets totaling $19.6 million. Also included in the bid
was a premium of approximately $262,000 on AUB’s deposits. The bid resulted in a cash payment from the FDIC totaling $17.1 million.
Capital Purchase Program
On November 21, 2008, the Company, pursuant to the Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”) established under the Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”), in connection with the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”), issued and sold to the United
States Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”), for an aggregate cash purchase price of $52 million, (i) 52,000 shares (the “Preferred
Shares”) of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per
share, and (ii) a ten-year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 679,443 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price of $11.48 per
share. Proceeds from the issuance of the Preferred Shares and the Warrant were allocated based on the relative market values of each.
As a result of the Company’s participation in the CPP, the Company was subject to the rules and regulations promulgated under the
EESA. These rules and regulations included certain limitations on compensation for senior executives, dividend payments and payments
to senior executives upon termination of employment, as well as certain obligations of the Company to increase its efforts to reduce the
number of foreclosures of primary residences.
On June 14, 2012, the Preferred Shares were sold by the Treasury through a registered public offering as part of the Treasury’s efforts
to wind down its remaining TARP bank investments. While the sale of the Preferred Shares to new investors did not result in any
accounting entries and does not change the Company’s capital position, it eliminated the executive compensation and corporate
governance restrictions that were applicable to the Company during the period in which the Treasury held its investment in the Preferred
Shares. Subsequently, on August 22, 2012, the Company repurchased the Warrant from the Treasury for $2.67 million and in December
2012, the Company repurchased 24,000 of the outstanding Preferred Shares. The Company redeemed the remaining 28,000 outstanding
Preferred Shares on March 24, 2014.
MARKET AREAS AND COMPETITION
The banking industry in general, and in the southeastern United States specifically, is highly competitive and dramatic changes continue
to occur throughout the industry. Our select market areas in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina have experienced strong
population growth over the past 20 to 30 years, but have endured significant economic challenges in recent years. Intense market
demands, national and local economic pressures, fluctuating interest rates and increased customer awareness of product and service
differences among financial institutions have forced banks to diversify their services and become much more cost effective. Over the
past few years, our Bank has faced strong competition in attracting deposits at profitable levels. Competition for deposits comes from
other commercial banks, thrift institutions, mortgage bankers, finance companies, credit unions and issuers of securities such as
brokerage firms. Interest rates, convenience of office locations and marketing are all significant factors in our Bank’s competition for
deposits.
Competition for loans comes from other commercial banks, thrift institutions, savings banks, insurance companies, consumer finance
companies, credit unions and other institutional lenders. In order to remain competitive, our Bank has varied interest rates and loan fees
to some degree as well as increased the number and complexity of services provided. We have not varied or altered our underwriting
standards in any material respect in response to competitor willingness to do so and in some markets have not been able to experience
the growth in loans that we would have preferred. Competition is affected by the general availability of lendable funds, general and local
economic conditions, current interest rate levels and other factors that are not readily predictable.
Competition among providers of financial products and services continues to increase with consumers having the opportunity to select
from a growing variety of traditional and nontraditional alternatives. The industry continues to consolidate, which affects competition
by eliminating some regional and local institutions, while strengthening the franchise of acquirers. Management expects that competition
will become more intense in the future due to changes in state and federal laws and regulations and the entry of additional bank and
nonbank competitors. See “Supervision and Regulation” under this Item.
8
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 2014, the Company employed approximately 1,027 full-time-equivalent employees. We consider our relationship with
our employees to be good.
We have adopted the Ameris Bancorp 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, as a retirement plan for our employees. This plan provides deferral of
compensation by our employees and contributions by Ameris. We also maintain a comprehensive employee benefits program providing,
among other benefits, hospitalization and major medical insurance and life insurance. Management considers these benefits to be
competitive with those offered by other financial institutions in our market areas. Our employees are not represented by any collective
bargaining group.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company makes loans to our directors and their affiliates and to banking officers. These loans are made on substantially the same
terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions and do not involve more than normal credit risk. At December 31,
2014, we had approximately $2.93 billion in total loans outstanding, of which approximately $4.4 million were outstanding to certain
directors and their affiliates. Company policy prohibits loans to executive officers.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
General
We are extensively regulated under federal and state law. Generally, these laws and regulations are intended to protect depositors and
not shareholders. The following is a summary of certain provisions of certain laws that affect the regulation of bank holding companies
and banks. The discussion is qualified in its entirety by reference to applicable laws and regulations. Changes in such laws and
regulations may have a material effect on our business and prospects.
Federal Bank Holding Company Regulation and Structure
As a bank holding company, we are subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act and to the supervision, examination
and reporting requirements of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). Our Bank has a Georgia
state charter and is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the FDIC and the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance
(the “GDBF”).
The Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before:
•
•
•
it may acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if, after the acquisition, the bank
holding company will directly or indirectly own or control more than 5% of the voting shares of the bank;
it or any of its subsidiaries, other than a bank, may acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any bank; or
it may merge or consolidate with any other bank holding company.
The Bank Holding Company Act further provides that the Federal Reserve may not approve any transaction that would result in a
monopoly or that would substantially lessen competition in the banking business, unless the public interest in meeting the needs of the
communities to be served outweighs the anti-competitive effects. The Federal Reserve is also required to consider the financial and
managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding companies and banks involved and the convenience and needs of the
communities to be served. Consideration of financial resources generally focuses on capital adequacy, and consideration of convenience
and needs issues focuses, in part, on the performance under the Community Reinvestment Act, both of which are discussed elsewhere
in more detail.
Subject to various exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with related regulations,
require Federal Reserve approval prior to any person or company acquiring “control” of a bank holding company. Control is conclusively
presumed to exist if an individual or company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities of a bank holding company. Control
is also presumed to exist, although rebuttable, if a person or company acquires 10% or more, but less than 25%, of any class of voting
securities and either:
•
•
the bank holding company has registered securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act; or
no other person owns a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction.
Our Common Stock is registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. The regulations provide a procedure for challenging rebuttable
presumptions of control.
9
The Bank Holding Company Act generally prohibits a bank holding company from engaging in activities other than banking; managing
or controlling banks or other permissible subsidiaries and acquiring or retaining direct or indirect control of any company engaged in
any activities other than activities closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks. In determining whether a particular
activity is permissible, the Federal Reserve considers whether performing the activity can be expected to produce benefits to the public
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest
or unsound banking practices. The Federal Reserve has the power to order a bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any
activity or control of any subsidiary when the continuation of the activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety,
soundness or stability of any bank subsidiary of that bank holding company.
Under the Bank Holding Company Act, a bank holding company may file an election with the Federal Reserve to be treated as a financial
holding company and engage in an expanded list of financial activities. The election must be accompanied by a certification that all of
the company’s insured depository institution subsidiaries are “well capitalized” and “well managed.” Additionally, the Community
Reinvestment Act rating of each subsidiary bank must be satisfactory or better. Effective August 24, 2000, pursuant to a previously-
filed election with the Federal Reserve, Ameris became a financial holding company. As such, we may engage in activities that are
financial in nature or incidental or complementary to financial activities, including insurance underwriting, securities underwriting and
dealing, and making merchant banking investments in commercial and financial companies. If the Bank ceases to be “well capitalized”
or “well managed” under applicable regulatory standards, the Federal Reserve may, among other things, place limitations on our ability
to conduct these broader financial activities. In addition, if the Bank receives a rating of less than satisfactory under the Community
Reinvestment Act, we would be prohibited from engaging in any additional activities other than those permissible for bank holding
companies that are not financial holding companies. If, after becoming a financial holding company and undertaking activities not
permissible for a bank holding company, the company fails to continue to meet any of the prerequisites for financial holding company
status, including those described above, the company must enter into an agreement with the Federal Reserve to comply with all
applicable capital and management requirements. If the company does not return to compliance within 180 days, the Federal Reserve
may order the company to divest its subsidiary banks or the company may discontinue or divest investments in companies engaged in
activities permissible only for a bank holding company that has elected to be treated as a financial holding company.
Under Federal Reserve policy, we are expected to act as a source of financial strength for the Bank and to commit resources to support
the Bank. This support may be required at times when, without this Federal Reserve policy, we might not be inclined to provide it. In
addition, any capital loans made by us to the Bank will be repaid only after its deposits and various other obligations are repaid in full.
Our Bank is also subject to numerous state and federal statutes and regulations that affect its business, activities and operations and is
supervised and examined by state and federal bank regulatory agencies. The FDIC and the GDBF regularly examine the operations of
our Bank and are given the authority to approve or disapprove mergers, consolidations, the establishment of branches and similar
corporate actions. These agencies also have the power to prevent the continuance or development of unsafe or unsound banking practices
or other violations of law.
Payment of Dividends and Other Restrictions
Ameris is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries. While there are various legal and regulatory limitations under federal
and state law on the extent to which our Bank can pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to Ameris, the principal source of our cash
revenues is dividends from our Bank. The prior approval of applicable regulatory authorities is required if the total amount of all
dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year exceeds 50% of the Bank’s net profits for the previous year. The relevant federal
and state regulatory agencies also have authority to prohibit a state member bank or bank holding company, which would include Ameris
and the Bank, from engaging in what, in the opinion of such regulatory body, constitutes an unsafe or unsound practice in conducting
its business. The payment of dividends could, depending upon the financial condition of the subsidiary, be deemed to constitute an
unsafe or unsound practice in conducting its business.
Under Georgia law, the prior approval of the GDBF is required before any cash dividends may be paid by a state bank if: (i) total
classified assets at the most recent examination of such bank exceed 80% of the equity capital (as defined, which includes the reserve
for loan losses) of such bank; (ii) the aggregate amount of dividends declared or anticipated to be declared in the calendar year exceeds
50% of the net profits (as defined) for the previous calendar year; or (iii) the ratio of equity capital to adjusted total assets is less than
6%. As of December 31, 2014, there was approximately $21.4 million of retained earnings of our Bank available for payment of cash
dividends under applicable regulations without obtaining regulatory approval.
In addition, our Bank is subject to limitations under Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act with respect to extensions of credit to,
investments in and certain other transactions with Ameris. Furthermore, loans and extensions of credit are also subject to various
collateral requirements.
10
The Federal Reserve has issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, which expresses the
Federal Reserve’s view that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the holding company’s net income
for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earning retention that is consistent with the holding company’s
capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Federal Reserve also indicated that it would be inappropriate for a
holding company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. Furthermore, under the prompt corrective
action regulations adopted by the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve may prohibit a bank holding company from paying any dividends
if one or more of the holding company’s bank subsidiaries are classified as undercapitalized.
A bank holding company is required to give the Federal Reserve prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its outstanding
equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such
purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of its consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve
may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or
would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve order or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve.
Capital Adequacy
We must comply with the Federal Reserve’s established capital adequacy standards, and our Bank is required to comply with the capital
adequacy standards established by the FDIC. The Federal Reserve has promulgated two basic measures of capital adequacy for bank
holding companies: a risk-based measure and a leverage measure. A bank holding company must satisfy all applicable capital standards
to be considered in compliance.
The risk-based capital standards are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profile among
banks and bank holding companies, account for off-balance-sheet exposure and minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets.
Assets and off-balance-sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate weights. The resulting capital ratios
represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance-sheet items.
The minimum guideline for the ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets is 8%. At least one-half of total capital must be comprised
of Tier 1 Capital, which is common stock, undivided profits, minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries and
noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets. The remainder may consist of Tier 2 Capital,
which is subordinated debt, other preferred stock and a limited amount of loan loss reserves. Since 2001, our consolidated capital ratios
have increased due to the issuance of trust preferred securities. At December 31, 2014, all of our trust preferred securities were included
in Tier 1 Capital. At December 31, 2014, our total risk-based capital ratio and our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio were 13.42% and
12.66%, respectively. Neither Ameris nor the Bank has been advised by any federal banking agency of any additional specific minimum
capital ratio requirement applicable to it. On January 29, 2015, we completed a private placement of 5,320,000 share of the Company’s
common stock at a price of $22.50 per share. We received net proceeds from the issuance of approximately $114.5 million (after
deducting placement agent commissions and expenses).
In addition, the Federal Reserve has established minimum leverage ratio guidelines for bank holding companies. These guidelines
provide for a minimum ratio of Tier 1 Capital to average assets, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets, of 3% for bank holding
companies that meet specified criteria. All other bank holding companies generally are required to maintain a minimum leverage ratio
of 4%. At December 31, 2014, our ratio was 8.94%, compared to 11.33% at December 31, 2013. The guidelines also provide that bank
holding companies experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions
substantially above the minimum supervisory levels without significant reliance on intangible assets. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve
has indicated that it will consider a “tangible Tier 1 Capital leverage ratio” and other indications of capital strength in evaluating
proposals for expansion or new activities. The Federal Reserve has not advised Ameris of any additional specific minimum leverage
ratio or tangible Tier 1 Capital leverage ratio applicable to it.
Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject a bank to a variety of enforcement remedies, including issuance of a capital directive,
the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, a prohibition on taking brokered deposits and certain other restrictions on its
business. As described below, the FDIC can impose substantial additional restrictions upon FDIC-insured depository institutions that
fail to meet applicable capital requirements.
11
The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (or “FDI Act”) requires the federal regulatory agencies to take “prompt corrective action” if a
depository institution does not meet minimum capital requirements. The FDI Act establishes five capital tiers: “well capitalized,”
“adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” A depository
institution’s capital tier will depend upon how its capital levels compare to various relevant capital measures and certain other factors,
as established by regulation.
The federal bank regulatory agencies have adopted regulations establishing relevant capital measurers and relevant capital levels
applicable to FDIC-insured banks. The relevant capital measures are the Total Capital ratio, Tier 1 Capital ratio and the leverage
ratio. Under the regulations, a FDIC-insured bank will be:
•
•
•
•
•
“well capitalized” if it has a Total Capital ratio of 10% or greater, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 6% or greater and a leverage ratio
of 5% or greater and is not subject to any order or written directive by the appropriate regulatory authority to meet and
maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure;
“adequately capitalized” if it has a Total Capital ratio of 8% or greater, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 4% or greater and a leverage
ratio of 4% or greater (3% in certain circumstances) and is not “well capitalized;”
“undercapitalized” if it has a Total Capital ratio of less than 8%, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of less than 4% or a leverage ratio of
less than 4% (3% in certain circumstances);
“significantly undercapitalized” if it has a Total Capital ratio of less than 6%, a Tier 1 Capital ratio of less than 3% or a
leverage ratio of less than 3%; and
“critically undercapitalized” if its tangible equity is equal to or less than 2% of average quarterly tangible assets.
An institution may be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than is indicated by its capital ratios if it is
determined to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with respect to certain
matters. As of December 31, 2014, our Bank had capital levels that qualify as “well capitalized” under such regulations.
The FDI Act generally prohibits an FDIC-insured bank from making a capital distribution (including payment of a dividend) or paying
any management fee to its holding company if the bank would thereafter be “undercapitalized.” “Undercapitalized” banks are subject
to growth limitations and are required to submit a capital restoration plan. The federal regulators may not accept a capital plan without
determining, among other things, that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to succeed in restoring the bank’s capital. In
addition, for a capital restoration plan to be acceptable, the bank’s parent holding company must guarantee that the institution will
comply with such capital restoration plan. The aggregate liability of the parent holding company is limited to the lesser of: (i) an amount
equal to 5% of the bank’s total assets at the time it became “undercapitalized”; and (ii) the amount which is necessary (or would have
been necessary) to bring the institution into compliance with all capital standards applicable with respect to such institution as of the
time it fails to comply with the plan. If a bank fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is “significantly undercapitalized.”
“Significantly undercapitalized” insured banks may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions, including orders to sell
sufficient voting stock to become “adequately capitalized,” requirements to reduce total assets and the cessation of receipt of deposits
from correspondent banks. “Critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to the appointment of a receiver or conservator. A bank
that is not “well capitalized” is also subject to certain limitations relating to brokered deposits.
The regulatory capital framework under which we operate has changed, and is expected to continue to change, in significant respects as
a result of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which was enacted in July 2010
and includes certain provisions concerning the capital regulations of U.S. banking regulators. These provisions are intended to subject
bank holding companies to the same capital requirements as their bank subsidiaries and to eliminate or significantly reduce the use of
hybrid capital instruments, especially trust preferred securities, as regulatory capital. Although a significant number of the rules and
regulations mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act have been finalized, many of the new requirements called for have yet to be implemented
and will likely be subject to implementing regulations over the course of several years. Given the uncertainty associated with the manner
in which the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented by the various regulatory agencies, the full extent of the impact
such requirements will have on financial institutions’ operations is unclear. The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may impact
the profitability of our business activities, require changes to certain of our business practices, impose upon us more stringent capital,
liquidity and leverage ratio requirements or otherwise adversely affect our business. These changes may also require us to invest
significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make necessary changes in order to comply with new statutory and
regulatory requirements.
12
In July 2013, the federal banking agencies approved an interim final rule that adopts a series of previously proposed rules to conform
U.S. regulatory capital rules with the international regulatory standards agreed to by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in
the accord referred to as “Basel III” and to implement requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. The adopted regulations establish new
higher capital ratio requirements, narrow the definitions of capital, impose new operating restrictions on banking organizations with
insufficient capital buffers and increase the risk weighting of certain assets. The Company and the Bank were required to comply with
the new capital requirements beginning January 1, 2015.
The regulatory changes found in the new final rule include the following:
The final rule establishes a new capital measure called “Common Equity Tier I Capital” consisting of common stock and
related surplus, retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income and, subject to certain adjustments, minority
common equity interests in subsidiaries. Unlike prior rules which excluded unrealized gains and losses on available for sale
debt securities from regulatory capital, the final rule generally requires accumulated other comprehensive income to flow
through to regulatory capital. Depository institutions and their holding companies are now required to maintain Common
Equity Tier I Capital equal to 4.5% of risk-weighted assets. Additionally, the regulations increased the required ratio of Tier
I Capital to risk-weighted assets from 4% to 6%. Tier I Capital consists of Common Equity Tier I Capital plus Additional Tier
I Capital which includes non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock. Neither cumulative preferred stock (other than certain
preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury) nor trust preferred securities qualify as Additional Tier I Capital, but they may be
included in Tier II Capital along with qualifying subordinated debt. The new regulations also require a minimum Tier I
leverage ratio of 4% for all institutions, while the minimum required ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets remains at
8%.
In addition to increased capital requirements, depository institutions and their holding companies will be required to maintain
a capital buffer of at least 2.5% of risk-weighted assets over and above the minimum risk-based capital requirements in order
to avoid limitations on the payment of dividends, the repurchase of shares or the payment of discretionary bonuses. The capital
conservation buffer requirement will be phased in, beginning January 1, 2016, requiring during 2016 a buffer amount greater
than 0.625% in order to avoid these limitations, and increasing the amount each year until beginning January 1, 2019, the
buffer amount must be greater than 2.5% in order to avoid the limitations.
The prompt corrective action regulations, under the final rule, incorporate a Common Equity Tier I Capital requirement and
raise the capital requirements for certain capital categories. In order to be adequately capitalized for purposes of the prompt
corrective action regulations, a banking organization is required to have at least an 8% Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio, a 6%
Tier I Risk-Based Capital Ratio, a 4.5% Common Equity Tier I Risk Based Capital Ratio and a 4% Tier I Leverage Ratio. To
be well capitalized, a banking organization is required to have at least a 10% Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio, an 8% Tier I
Risk-Based Capital Ratio, a 6.5% Common Equity Tier I Risk-Based Capital Ratio and a 5% Tier I Leverage Ratio.
We have conducted a pro forma analysis of these new requirements as of December 31, 2014 and have determined that if these
requirements were in effect on that date, the Company and the Bank would be considered well-capitalized and each would have a capital
conservation buffer greater than 2.5%.
Acquisitions
As an active acquirer, we must comply with numerous laws related to our acquisition activity. Under the Bank Holding Company Act,
a bank holding company may not directly or indirectly acquire ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares or substantially
all of the assets of any bank or merge or consolidate with another bank holding company without the prior approval of the Federal
Reserve. Current federal law authorizes interstate acquisitions of banks and bank holding companies without geographic
limitation. Furthermore, a bank headquartered in one state is authorized to merge with a bank headquartered in another state, as long as
neither of the states has opted out of such interstate merger authority prior to such date, and subject to any state requirement that the
target bank shall have been in existence and operating for a minimum period of time, not to exceed five years, and to certain deposit
market-share limitations. After a bank has established branches in a state through an interstate merger transaction, the bank may establish
and acquire additional branches at any location in the state where a bank headquartered in that state could have established or acquired
branches under applicable federal or state law.
13
FDIC Insurance Assessments
The FDIC insures the deposit accounts of the Bank up to the maximum amount provided by law. The general insurance limit is $250,000.
Effective November 21, 2008 and until December 31, 2010, the FDIC expanded deposit insurance limits for certain accounts under the
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”). Provided an institution did not opt out of the TLGP, the FDIC would fully guarantee
funds deposited in noninterest bearing transaction accounts, including interest on lawyer trust accounts (or “IOLTA” accounts) and
negotiable order of withdrawal accounts (or “NOW” accounts), with rates no higher than 0.50% through June 30, 2010, and no higher
than 0.25% after June 30, 2010, if the institution committed to maintain the interest rate at or below that rate. In conjunction with the
increased deposit insurance coverage, the amount of FDIC assessments paid by each Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) member institution
also increased. This increase to coverage was originally in effect through December 31, 2009, but was extended several times until it
expired on December 31, 2012.
The FDIC assesses deposit insurance premiums on each insured institution quarterly based on annualized rates for one of four risk
categories. Under the rules in effect through March 31, 2011, these rates are applied to the institution’s deposits. Each institution is
assigned to one of four risk categories based on its capital, supervisory ratings and other factors. Well capitalized institutions that are
financially sound with only a few minor weaknesses are assigned to Risk Category I. Risk Categories II, III and IV present progressively
greater risks to the DIF. A range of initial base assessment rates applies to each risk category, subject to adjustments based on an
institution’s unsecured debt, secured liabilities and brokered deposits, such that the total base assessment rates after adjustments range
from 7 to 24 basis points for Risk Category I, 17 to 43 basis points for Risk Category II, 27 to 58 basis points for Risk Category III, and
40 to 77.5 basis points for Risk Category IV.
As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC adopted rules effective April 1, 2011 under which insurance premium assessments are
based on an institution’s total assets minus its tangible equity (defined as Tier 1 capital) instead of its deposits. Under these rules, an
institution with total assets of less than $10 billion will be assigned to a risk category as described above, and a range of initial base
assessment rates will apply to each category, subject to adjustment downward based on unsecured debt issued by the institution and,
except for an institution in Risk Category I, adjustment upward if the institution’s brokered deposits exceed 10% of its domestic deposits,
to produce total base assessment rates. Total base assessment rates range from 2.5 to 9 basis points for Risk Category I, 9 to 24 basis
points for Risk Category II, 18 to 33 basis points for Risk Category III, and 30 to 45 basis points for Risk Category IV, all subject to
further adjustment upward if the institution holds more than a de minimis amount of unsecured debt issued by another FDIC-insured
institution. The FDIC may increase or decrease its rates by 2.0 basis points without further rulemaking. In an emergency, the FDIC
may also impose a special assessment.
The Company’s insurance assessments during 2014, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $3.0 million, $2.3 million and $1.5 million,
respectively. Because of the growing number of bank failures and costs to the DIF, the FDIC required that we prepay the assessments
that would normally have been paid during 2010 to 2012. This prepaid assessment amounted to approximately $12.3 million during
2009. During 2013, the FDIC refunded the remaining portion of the assessment to the Company; therefore, there was no remaining
prepaid balance on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014.
Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC has established 2.0% as the designated reserve ratio (“DRR”), which is the ratio of the DIF
to insured deposits. The FDIC has adopted a plan under which it will meet the statutory minimum DRR of 1.35% by September 30,
2020, the deadline imposed by the Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the FDIC to offset the effect of the increase in the
statutory minimum DRR to 1.35% on institutions with assets of less than $10 billion from the former statutory minimum of 1.15%. The
FDIC has not yet announced how it will implement this offset or how larger institutions will be affected by it.
The FDIC also collects a deposit-based assessment from insured financial institutions on behalf of the Financing Corporation (the
“FICO”). The funds from these assessments are used to service debt issued by FICO in its capacity as a financial vehicle for the Federal
Savings & Loan Insurance Corporation. The FICO assessment rate is set quarterly and in 2014 was $0.60 - $0.62 per $100 of assessable
deposits. These assessments will continue until the debt matures in 2017 through 2019.
Community Reinvestment Act
The Community Reinvestment Act requires federal bank regulatory agencies to encourage financial institutions to meet the credit needs
of low and moderate-income borrowers in their local communities. An institution’s size and business strategy determines the type of
examination that it will receive. Large, retail-oriented institutions are examined using a performance-based lending, investment and
service test. Small institutions are examined using a streamlined approach. All institutions may opt to be evaluated under a strategic plan
formulated with community input and pre-approved by the bank regulatory agency.
14
The Community Reinvestment Act regulations provide for certain disclosure obligations. Each institution must post a notice advising
the public of its right to comment to the institution and its regulator on the institution’s Community Reinvestment Act performance and
to review the institution’s Community Reinvestment Act public file. Each lending institution must maintain for public inspection a file
that includes a listing of branch locations and services, a summary of lending activity, a map of its communities and any written
comments from the public on its performance in meeting community credit needs. The Community Reinvestment Act requires public
disclosure of a financial institution’s written Community Reinvestment Act evaluations. This promotes enforcement of Community
Reinvestment Act requirements by providing the public with the status of a particular institution’s community reinvestment record.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act made various changes to the Community Reinvestment Act. Among other changes, Community
Reinvestment Act agreements with private parties must be disclosed and annual Community Reinvestment Act reports must be made
available to a bank’s primary federal regulator. A bank holding company will not be permitted to become a financial holding company
and no new activities authorized under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act may be commenced by a holding company or by a bank financial
subsidiary if any of its bank subsidiaries received less than a satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act rating in its latest Community
Reinvestment Act examination.
Consumer Protection Laws
The Bank is subject to a number of federal and state laws designed to protect borrowers and promote lending to various sectors of the
economy and population. These laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending
Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and state
law counterparts.
Federal law currently contains extensive customer privacy protection provisions. Under these provisions, a financial institution must
provide to its customers, at the inception of the customer relationship and annually thereafter, the institution’s policies and procedures
regarding the handling of customers’ nonpublic personal financial information. These provisions also provide that, except for certain
limited exceptions, an institution may not provide such personal information to unaffiliated third parties unless the institution discloses
to the customer that such information may be so provided and the customer is given the opportunity to opt out of such disclosure. Federal
law makes it a criminal offense, except in limited circumstances, to obtain or attempt to obtain customer information of a financial
nature by fraudulent or deceptive means.
Fiscal and Monetary Policy
Banking is a business which depends on interest rate differentials for success. In general, the difference between the interest paid by a
bank on its deposits and its other borrowings, and the interest received by a bank on its loans and securities holdings, constitutes the
major portion of a bank’s earnings. Thus, our earnings and growth will be subject to the influence of economic conditions generally,
both domestic and foreign, and also to the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States and its agencies, particularly the Federal
Reserve. The Federal Reserve regulates the supply of money through various means, including open market dealings in United States
government securities, the discount rate at which banks may borrow from the Federal Reserve and the reserve requirements on
deposits. The nature and timing of any changes in such policies and their effect on Ameris cannot be known at this time.
Current and future legislation and the policies established by federal and state regulatory authorities will affect our future
operations. Banking legislation and regulations may limit our growth and the return to our investors by restricting certain of our activities.
In addition, capital requirements could be changed and have the effect of restricting our activities or requiring additional capital to be
maintained. We cannot predict with certainty what changes, if any, will be made to existing federal and state legislation and regulations
or the effect that such changes may have on our business.
Federal Home Loan Bank System
Our Company has a correspondent relationship with the FHLB of Atlanta, which is one of 12 regional FHLBs that administer the home
financing credit function of savings companies. Each FHLB serves as a reserve or central bank for its members within its assigned
region. FHLBs are funded primarily from proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB system and make
loans to members (i.e., advances) in accordance with policies and procedures, established by the Board of Directors of the FHLB which
are subject to the oversight of the Federal Housing Finance Board. All advances from the FHLB are required to be fully secured by
sufficient collateral as determined by the FHLB. In addition, all long-term advances are required to provide funds for residential home
financing.
The FHLB provides certain services to our Company such as processing checks and other items, buying and selling federal funds,
handling money transfers and exchanges, shipping coin and currency, providing security and safekeeping of funds or other valuable
items and furnishing limited management information and advice. As compensation for these services, our Company maintains certain
balances with FHLB in interest-bearing accounts.
15
Under federal law, the FHLBs are required to provide funds for the resolution of troubled savings companies and to contribute to low
and moderately-priced housing programs through direct loans or interest subsidies on advances targeted for community investment and
low and moderate-income housing projects.
Real Estate Lending Evaluations
The federal regulators have adopted uniform standards for evaluations of loans secured by real estate or made to finance improvements
to real estate. Banks are required to establish and maintain written internal real estate lending policies consistent with safe and sound
banking practices and appropriate to the size of the institution and the nature and scope of its operations. The regulations establish loan
to value ratio limitations on real estate loans. Our Company’s loan policies establish limits on loan to value ratios that are equal to or
less than those established in such regulations.
Commercial Real Estate Concentrations
Our lending operations may be subject to enhanced scrutiny by federal banking regulators based on our concentration of commercial
real estate loans. The federal banking regulators previously issued guidance reminding financial institutions of the risk posed by
commercial real estate (“CRE”) lending concentrations. CRE loans generally include land development, construction loans, and loans
secured by multifamily property, and nonfarm, nonresidential real property where the primary source of repayment is derived from
rental income associated with the property. The guidance prescribes the following guidelines for its examiners to help identify
institutions that are potentially exposed to significant CRE risk and may warrant greater supervisory scrutiny:
•
•
total reported loans for construction, land development and other land (“C&D”) represent 100% or more of the institution’s
total capital; or
total CRE loans represent 300% or more of the institution’s total capital, and the outstanding balance of the institution’s
CRE loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more.
As of December 31, 2014, excluding purchased non-covered and covered assets, our C&D concentration as a percentage of capital
totaled 44.1% and our CRE concentration, net of owner-occupied loans, as a percentage of capital totaled 165.9%. Including purchased
non-covered and covered loans subject to loss-share agreements with the FDIC, the Company’s C&D concentration as a percentage of
capital totaled 66.5% and our CRE concentration, net of owner-occupied loans, as a percentage of capital totaled 232.3%.
Limitations on Incentive Compensation
The Dodd-Frank Act requires the federal banking regulators and other agencies, including the SEC, to issue regulations or guidelines
requiring disclosure to the regulators of incentive-based compensation arrangements and to prohibit incentive-based compensation
arrangements for directors, officers or employees that encourage inappropriate risks by providing excessive compensation, fees or
benefits or that could lead to material financial loss to a financial institution. Proposed regulations for this purpose have been published,
which are based upon the key principles that incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage
risk-taking beyond the organization’s ability to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls
and risk management, and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the
organization’s board of directors and appropriate policies, procedures and monitoring. The proposed regulations are consistent with the
Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies issued by the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and other regulators in June 2010.
As part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of banking organizations will be
reviewed, and the regulator’s findings will be incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the
organization’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a banking organization if
its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the organization’s
safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct any deficiencies.
Economic Environment
The policies of regulatory authorities, including the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve, have a significant effect on the operating
results of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. Among the means available to the Federal Reserve to affect the money supply
are open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings and changes in
reserve requirements against member bank deposits. These means are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth and
distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits, and their use may affect interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits.
The Federal Reserve’s monetary policies have materially affected the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected
to continue to do so in the future. The nature of future monetary policies and the effect of these policies on the business and earnings of
our Company cannot be known at this time.
16
Evolving Legislation and Regulatory Action
The Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law in 2010 and implements many new changes in the way financial and banking operations are
regulated in the United States, including through the creation of a new resolution authority, mandating higher capital and liquidity
requirements, requiring banks to pay increased fees to regulatory agencies and numerous other provisions intended to strengthen the
financial services sector. The Dodd-Frank Act provides for the creation of the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), which
is charged with overseeing and coordinating the efforts of the primary U.S. financial regulatory agencies (including the Federal Reserve,
the FDIC and the SEC) in establishing regulations to address systemic financial stability concerns. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides
for the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), a consumer financial services regulator. The CFPB is
authorized to prevent unfair, deceptive and abusive practices and ensure that consumers have access to markets for consumer financial
products and services and that such markets are fair, transparent and competitive. Many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to
further rulemaking and will take effect over several years, with the result that the overall financial impact on the Company and the Bank
cannot be anticipated at this time.
In addition, from time to time, various other legislative and regulatory initiatives are introduced in Congress and state legislatures, as
well as by regulatory agencies, that may impact the Company or the Bank. Such initiatives may include proposals to expand or contract
the powers of bank holding companies and depository institutions or proposals to substantially change the financial institution regulatory
system. Such legislation could change banking statutes and the operating environment of Ameris in substantial and unpredictable ways.
If enacted, such legislation could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the
competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions and other financial institutions. The Company cannot predict
whether any such legislation will be enacted, and, if enacted, the effect that it, or any implementing regulations, would have on the
financial condition or results of operations of the Company. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to the
Company or the Bank could have a material effect on the business of the Company.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in our Common Stock is subject to risks inherent in our business. The material risks and uncertainties that management
believes affect Ameris are described below. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and
uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report. The
risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties that management
is not aware of or focused on or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair the Company’s business operations. This
Annual Report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.
If any of the following risks or uncertainties actually occurs, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of the Common Stock could decline significantly, and you could lose
all or part of your investment.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMPANY AND INDUSTRY
Difficult market conditions have adversely affected the industry in which we operate.
The capital and credit markets have been experiencing volatility and disruption for over six years. Declines in the housing market over
this period, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment, have negatively impacted the
credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including
government-sponsored entities, as well as major commercial and investment banks. As a result of the broad based economic decline and
the troubled economic conditions, financial institutions have pursued defensive strategies, including seeking additional capital. In some
cases, financial institutions that did not pursue defensive strategies or did not succeed in those strategies, have failed. Reflecting concern
about the stability of the financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have
reduced or ceased providing funding to borrowers, including to other financial institutions. Additionally, the market disruptions have
increased the level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread
reduction of business activity generally. Although the difficult conditions in the financial markets may ease in the future, we are
managing the Company with numerous defensive strategies. A worsening of the current conditions would exacerbate the adverse effects
of these difficult market conditions on us and others in the financial institutions industry. In particular, we may face the following risks
in connection with these events:
• Unreliable market conditions with significantly reduced real estate activity may adversely affect our ability to determine the
fair value of the assets we hold. If we determine that a significant portion of our assets have values that are significantly
below their recorded carrying value, we could recognize a material charge to earnings in the quarter during which such
determination was made, our capital ratios would be affected and this may result in increased regulatory scrutiny.
• We may expect to face increased regulation of our industry. Compliance with such regulations may increase our costs and
limit our ability to pursue business opportunities.
17
• Market developments and the resulting economic pressure on consumers may affect consumer confidence levels and may
cause increases in delinquencies and default rates, which, among other effects, could affect our charge-offs and provision
for loan losses.
• Competition in the industry could intensify as a result of the increasing consolidation of financial services companies in
connection with current market conditions.
Legislation and regulatory proposals enacted in response to market and economic conditions may materially adversely affect our
business and results of operations.
The banking industry is heavily regulated. We are subject to examinations, supervision and comprehensive regulation by various federal
and state agencies. Our compliance with these regulations is costly and restricts certain of our activities. Banking regulations are
primarily intended to protect the federal deposit insurance fund and depositors, not shareholders. The burden imposed by federal and
state regulations puts banks at a competitive disadvantage compared to less regulated competitors such as finance companies, mortgage
banking companies and leasing companies. Changes in the laws, regulations and regulatory practices affecting the banking industry may
increase our costs of doing business or otherwise adversely affect us and create competitive advantages for others. Federal economic
and monetary policies may also affect our ability to attract deposits and other funding sources, make loans and investments and achieve
satisfactory interest spreads.
The Dodd-Frank Act represents a significant overhaul of many aspects of the regulation of the financial-services industry, including
new or revised regulation of such things as systemic risk, capital adequacy, deposit insurance assessments and consumer financial
protection. In addition, the federal banking regulators have issued joint guidance on incentive compensation and the Treasury and the
federal banking regulators have issued statements calling for higher capital and liquidity requirements for banking organizations.
Complying with these and other new legislative or regulatory requirements, and any programs established thereunder, could have a
material adverse impact on our results of operations, our financial condition and our ability to fill positions with the most qualified
candidates available.
Our revenues are highly correlated to market interest rates.
Our assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature, and as a result, we are subject to significant risks tied to changes in interest
rates. Our ability to operate profitably is largely dependent upon net interest income. In 2014, net interest income made up 70.5% of our
recurring revenue. Unexpected movement in interest rates, that may or may not change the slope of the current yield curve, could cause
our net interest margins to decrease, subsequently decreasing net interest income. In addition, such changes could materially adversely
affect the valuation of our assets and liabilities.
At present our one-year interest rate sensitivity position is mildly liability sensitive, such that a gradual increase in interest rates during
the next twelve months should have a slightly negative impact on net interest income during that period. However, as with most financial
institutions, our results of operations are affected by changes in interest rates and our ability to manage this risk. The difference between
interest rates charged on interest-earning assets and interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities may be affected by changes in market
interest rates, changes in relationships between interest rate indices, and changes in the relationships between long-term and short-term
market interest rates. In addition, the mix of assets and liabilities could change as varying levels of market interest rates might present
our customer base with more attractive options.
Certain changes in interest rates, inflation, deflation or the financial markets could affect demand for our products and our ability
to deliver products efficiently.
Loan originations, and potentially loan revenues, could be materially adversely impacted by sharply rising interest rates. Conversely,
sharply falling rates could increase prepayments within our securities portfolio lowering interest earnings from those investments. An
unanticipated increase in inflation could cause our operating costs related to salaries and benefits, technology and supplies to increase
at a faster pace than revenues.
The fair market value of our securities portfolio and the investment income from these securities also fluctuate depending on general
economic and market conditions. In addition, actual net investment income and/or cash flows from investments that carry prepayment
risk, such as mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities, may differ from those anticipated at the time of investment as a result
of interest rate fluctuations.
18
The downgrade of the U.S. credit rating could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and liquidity.
Standard & Poor’s lowered its long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America from AAA to AA+ in 2011 and affirmed
that rating again in 2014. A further downgrade by Standard & Poor’s or one or more other rating agencies could have a material adverse
impact on financial markets and economic conditions in the United States and worldwide. Any such adverse impact could have a
material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.
Our concentration of real estate loans subjects the Company to risks that could materially adversely affect our results of operations
and financial condition.
The majority of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate. As the economy has deteriorated and depressed real estate values, the
collateral value of the portfolio and the revenue stream from those loans has come under stress and has required additional provision to
the allowance for loan losses. Our ability to dispose of foreclosed real estate and resolve credit quality issues is dependent on real estate
activity and real estate prices, both of which have been unpredictable for more than five years.
Greater loan losses than expected may materially adversely affect our earnings.
We, as lenders, are exposed to the risk that our customers will be unable to repay their loans in accordance with their terms and that any
collateral securing the payment of their loans may not be sufficient to assure repayment. Credit losses are inherent in the business of
making loans and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Our credit risk with respect to our real estate and
construction loan portfolio will relate principally to the creditworthiness of business entities and the value of the real estate serving as
security for the repayment of loans. Our credit risk with respect to our commercial and consumer loan portfolio will relate principally
to the general creditworthiness of businesses and individuals within our local markets.
We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio and provide an allowance for estimated loan
losses based on a number of factors. We believe that our current allowance for loan losses is adequate. However, if our assumptions or
judgments prove to be incorrect, the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover actual loan losses. We may have to increase
our allowance in the future in response to the request of one of our primary banking regulators, to adjust for changing conditions and
assumptions, or as a result of any deterioration in the quality of our loan portfolio. The actual amount of future provisions for loan losses
cannot be determined at this time and may vary from the amounts of past provisions.
Our business is highly correlated to local economic conditions in a geographically concentrated part of the United States.
Unlike larger organizations that are more geographically diversified, our banking offices are primarily concentrated in select markets in
Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina. As a result of this geographic concentration, our financial results depend largely upon
economic conditions in these market areas. Deterioration in economic conditions in the markets we serve could result in one or more of
the following:
•
an increase in loan delinquencies;
an increase in problem assets and foreclosures;
a decrease in the demand for our products and services; and
a decrease in the value of collateral for loans, especially real estate, in turn reducing customers’ borrowing power, the value
of assets associated with problem loans and collateral coverage.
•
•
•
We face additional risks due to our increased mortgage banking activities that could negatively impact net income and profitability.
We sell substantially all of the mortgage loans that we originate. The sale of these loans generates noninterest income and can be a
source of liquidity for the Bank. Disruption in the secondary market for residential mortgage loans as well as continued declines in real
estate values could result in one or more of the following:
•
•
•
•
•
our inability to sell mortgage loans on the secondary market, which could negatively impact our liquidity position;
declines in real estate values could decrease the potential of mortgage originations, which could negatively impact our
earnings;
if it is determined that loans were made in breach of our representations and warranties to the secondary market, we could
incur losses associated with the loans;
increased compliance requirements could result in higher compliance costs, higher foreclosure proceedings or lower loan
origination volume, all which could negatively impact future earnings; and
a rise in interest rates could cause a decline in mortgage originations, which could negatively impact our earnings.
19
Our growth and financial performance may be negatively impacted if we are unable to successfully execute our growth plans.
Economic conditions and other factors, such as our ability to identify appropriate markets for expansion, our ability to recruit and retain
qualified personnel, our ability to fund earning asset growth at a reasonable and profitable level, sufficient capital to support our growth
initiatives, competitive factors and banking laws, will impact our success.
We may seek to supplement our internal growth through acquisitions. We cannot predict with certainty the number, size or timing of
acquisitions, or whether any such acquisitions will occur at all. Our acquisition efforts have traditionally focused on targeted banking
entities in markets in which we currently operate and markets in which we believe we can compete effectively. However, as
consolidation of the financial services industry continues, the competition for suitable acquisition candidates may increase. We may
compete with other financial services companies for acquisition opportunities, and many of these competitors have greater financial
resources than we do and may be able to pay more for an acquisition than we are able or willing to pay. We also may need additional
debt or equity financing in the future to fund acquisitions. We may not be able to obtain additional financing or, if available, it may not
be in amounts and on terms acceptable to us. If we are unable to locate suitable acquisition candidates willing to sell on terms acceptable
to us, or we are otherwise unable to obtain additional debt or equity financing necessary for us to continue making acquisitions, we
would be required to find other methods to grow our business and we may not grow at the same rate we have in the past, or at all.
Generally, we must receive federal regulatory approval before we can acquire a bank or bank holding company. In determining whether
to approve a proposed bank acquisition, federal bank regulators will consider, among other factors, the effect of the acquisition on the
competition, financial condition and future prospects. The regulators also review current and projected capital ratios and levels, the
competence, experience and integrity of management and its record of compliance with laws and regulations, the convenience and needs
of the communities to be served (including the acquiring institution’s record of compliance under the Community Reinvestment Act)
and the effectiveness of the acquiring institution in combating money laundering activities. We cannot be certain when or if, or on what
terms and conditions, any required regulatory approvals will be granted. We may also be required to sell banks or branches as a condition
to receiving regulatory approval, which condition may not be acceptable to us or, if acceptable to us, may reduce the benefit of any
acquisition.
•
•
•
In the past, we have utilized de novo branching in new and existing markets as a way to supplement our growth. De novo branching and
any acquisition carry with it numerous risks, including the following:
the inability to obtain all required regulatory approvals;
significant costs and anticipated operating losses associated with establishing a de novo branch or a new bank;
the inability to secure the services of qualified senior management;
the local market may not accept the services of a new bank owned and managed by a bank holding company headquartered
outside of the market area of the new bank;
economic downturns in the new market;
the inability to obtain attractive locations within a new market at a reasonable cost; and
the additional strain on management resources and internal systems and controls.
•
•
•
•
We have experienced to some extent many of these risks with our de novo branching to date.
We rely on dividends from the Bank for most of our revenue.
Ameris is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries. It receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends from the
Bank. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on the Common Stock and interest and principal on the
Company’s debt. Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that the Bank may pay to the Company.
Also, the Company’s right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization is subject to the
prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors. In the event the Bank is unable to pay dividends to the Company, the Company may not be
able to service debt, pay obligations or pay dividends on the Common Stock and its business, financial condition and results of operations
may be materially adversely affected. Consequently, cash-based activities, including further investments in or support of, the Bank
could require borrowings or additional issuances of common or preferred stock.
We are subject to regulation by various federal and state entities.
We are subject to the regulations of the SEC, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the GDBF. New regulations issued by these agencies
may adversely affect our ability to carry on our business activities. We are subject to various federal and state laws and certain changes
in these laws and regulations may adversely affect our operations. Noncompliance with certain of these regulations may impact our
business plans, including our ability to branch, offer certain products or execute existing or planned business strategies.
20
We are also subject to the accounting rules and regulations of the SEC and the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Changes in
accounting rules could materially adversely affect the reported financial statements or our results of operations and may also require
extraordinary efforts or additional costs to implement. Any of these laws or regulations may be modified or changed from time to time,
and we cannot be assured that such modifications or changes will not adversely affect us.
We are subject to industry competition which may have an impact upon our success.
Our profitability depends on our ability to compete successfully. We operate in a highly competitive financial services environment.
Certain competitors are larger and may have more resources than we do. We face competition in our regional market areas from other
commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, internet banks, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies,
brokerage and investment banking firms, and other financial intermediaries that offer similar services. Some of our nonbank competitors
are not subject to the same extensive regulations that govern us or our bank subsidiary and may have greater flexibility in competing for
business.
Another competitive factor is that the financial services market, including banking services, is undergoing rapid changes with frequent
introductions of new technology-driven products and services. Our future success may depend, in part, on our ability to use technology
competitively to provide products and services that provide convenience to customers and create additional efficiencies in our operations.
Changes in the policies of monetary authorities and other government action could materially adversely affect our profitability.
The results of our operations are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Federal Reserve. The instruments
of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve include open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in the
discount rate or the federal funds rate on bank borrowings and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. In view of
uncertain conditions in the national economy and in the money markets, we cannot predict with certainty possible future changes in
interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand or our business and earnings.
We may need to rely on the financial markets to provide needed capital.
Our Common Stock is listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”). Although we anticipate that our capital
resources will be adequate for the foreseeable future to meet our capital requirements, at times we may depend on the liquidity of the
NASDAQ market to raise equity capital. If the market should fail to operate, or if conditions in the capital markets are adverse, we may
be constrained in raising capital. Downgrades in the opinions of the analysts that follow our Company may cause our stock price to fall
and significantly limit our ability to access the markets for additional capital. Should these risks materialize, our ability to further expand
our operations through internal growth or acquisition may be limited.
We may invest or spend the proceeds in stock offerings in ways with which you may not agree and in ways that may not earn a profit.
We may choose to use the proceeds of future stock offerings for general corporate purposes, including for possible acquisition
opportunities that may become available. It is not known whether suitable acquisition opportunities may become available or whether
we will be able to successfully complete any such acquisitions. We may use the proceeds of an offering only to focus on sustaining our
organic, or internal, growth or for other purposes. In addition, we may use all or a portion of the proceeds of an offering to support our
capital. You may not agree with the ways we decide to use the proceeds of any stock offerings, and our use of the proceeds may not
yield any profits.
We face risks related to our operational, technological and organizational infrastructure.
Our ability to grow and compete is dependent on our ability to build or acquire the necessary operational and technological infrastructure
and to manage the cost of that infrastructure while we expand. Similar to other large corporations, in our case, operational risk can
manifest itself in many ways, such as errors related to failed or inadequate processes, faulty or disabled computer systems, fraud by
employees or persons outside of our Company and exposure to external events. We are dependent on our operational infrastructure to
help manage these risks. In addition, we are heavily dependent on the strength and capability of our technology systems which we use
both to interface with our customers and to manage our internal financial and other systems. Our ability to develop and deliver new
products that meet the needs of our existing customers and attract new customers depends in part on the functionality of our technology
systems. Additionally, our ability to run our business in compliance with applicable laws and regulations is dependent on these
infrastructures.
21
We continuously monitor our operational and technological capabilities and make modifications and improvements when we believe it
will be cost effective to do so. In some instances, we may build and maintain these capabilities ourselves. We also outsource some of
these functions to third parties. These third parties may experience errors or disruptions that could adversely impact us and over which
we may have limited control. We also face risk from the integration of new infrastructure platforms and/or new third party providers of
such platforms into our existing businesses.
A security breach, cyber-attack or interruption of our technology systems may impact our financial results and customer retention.
We rely on data processing systems on a variety of computing platforms and networks. While we believe we have implemented
appropriate measures to mitigate potential risks to our operations and technology functions, we cannot be certain that a security breach,
cyber-attack or interruption will not occur. Such an interruption or security breach could disrupt our operations or result in the disclosure
of sensitive, personal customer information. This could have a negative impact on our financial results through damage to our reputation,
costs to remediate the situation, potential civil litigation, additional regulatory scrutiny, loss of customers and potential financial liability.
Financial services companies depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties.
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions, the Company may rely on information furnished by or on behalf of
customers and counterparties, including financial statements, credit reports and other financial information. The Company may also rely
on representations of those customers, counterparties or other third parties, such as independent auditors, as to the accuracy and
completeness of that information. Reliance on inaccurate or misleading financial statements, credit reports or other financial information
could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business and, in turn, the Company’s financial condition and results of
operations.
Reputational risk and social factors may impact our results.
Our ability to originate and maintain accounts is highly dependent upon customer and other external perceptions of our business practices
and our financial health. Adverse perceptions regarding our business practices or our financial health could damage our reputation in
both the customer and funding markets, leading to difficulties in generating and maintaining accounts as well as in financing them.
Adverse developments with respect to the consumer or other external perceptions regarding the practices of our competitors, or our
industry as a whole, may also adversely impact our reputation. In addition, adverse reputational impacts on third parties with whom we
have important relationships may also adversely impact our reputation. Adverse impacts on our reputation, or the reputation of our
industry, may also result in greater regulatory or legislative scrutiny, which may lead to laws, regulations or regulatory actions that may
change or constrain the manner in which we engage with our customers and the products we offer. Adverse reputational impacts or
events may also increase our litigation risk. We carefully monitor internal and external developments for areas of potential reputational
risk and have established governance structures to assist in evaluating such risks in our business practices and decisions.
We may not be able to attract and retain skilled people.
The Company’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people in most
activities engaged in by the Company can be intense and the Company may not be able to hire people or to retain them. The unexpected
loss of services of one or more of the Company’s key personnel could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business
because of their skills, knowledge of the Company’s market, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified
replacement personnel.
We engage in acquisitions of other businesses from time to time. These acquisitions may not produce revenue or earnings
enhancements or cost savings at levels or within timeframes originally anticipated and may result in unforeseen integration
difficulties.
When appropriate opportunities arise, we will engage in acquisitions of other businesses. Difficulty in integrating an acquired business
or company may cause us not to realize expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence or other
anticipated benefits from any acquisition. The integration could result in higher than expected deposit attrition (run-off), loss of key
employees, disruption of our business or the business of the acquired company, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to maintain
relationships with customers and employees or achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. We will likely need to make additional
investments in equipment and personnel to manage higher asset levels and loan balances as a result of any significant acquisition, which
may materially adversely impact our earnings. Also, the negative effect of any divestitures required by regulatory authorities in
acquisitions or business combinations may be greater than expected.
In evaluating potential acquisition opportunities, we may seek to acquire failed banks through FDIC-assisted transactions. While the
FDIC may, in such transactions, provide assistance to mitigate certain risks, such as sharing in exposure to loan losses, and providing
indemnification against certain liabilities, of the failed institution, we may not be able to accurately estimate our potential exposure to
loan losses and other potential liabilities, or the difficulty of integration, in acquiring such institution.
22
Depending on the condition of any institution that we may acquire, any acquisition may, at least in the near term, materially adversely
affect our capital and earnings and, if not successfully integrated following the acquisition, may continue to have such effects.
FDIC-assisted acquisition opportunities may not become available and increased competition may make it more difficult for us to
bid on failed bank transactions on terms we consider to be acceptable.
Our recent business strategy has included the acquisition of failing banks that the FDIC determined to place in receivership. If we choose
to continue pursuing these types of transactions in the future, we may find that the FDIC is not placing banks that meet our strategic
objectives into receivership. The bidding process for failing banks may also become very competitive, and the increased competition
may make it more difficult for us to bid on terms we consider to be acceptable.
Changes in national and local economic conditions could lead to higher loan charge-offs in connection with past FDIC-assisted
transactions, all of which may not be supported by loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC.
Although loan portfolios acquired in past FDIC-assisted transactions have initially been accounted for at fair value, we do not yet know
whether many of the loans we acquired will become impaired, and impairment may result in additional charge-offs to the portfolio. The
fluctuations in national, regional and local economic conditions, including those related to local residential, commercial real estate and
construction markets, may increase the level of charge-offs that we make to our loan portfolio, and, consequently, reduce our net income,
and may also increase the level of charge-offs on the loan portfolios that we have acquired such acquisitions and correspondingly reduce
our net income. These fluctuations are not predictable, cannot be controlled and may have a material adverse impact on our operations
and financial condition even if other favorable events occur.
Although we have entered into loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC which provide that a significant portion of losses related to
specified loan portfolios that we have acquired in connection with the FDIC-assisted transactions will be borne by the FDIC, we are not
protected for all losses resulting from charge-offs with respect to those specified loan portfolios. Additionally, the loss-sharing
agreements have limited terms; therefore, any charge-off of related losses that we experience after the term of the loss-sharing
agreements will not be reimbursable by the FDIC and will negatively impact our net income. The loss-sharing agreements also impose
standard requirements on us which must be satisfied in order to retain loss share protections.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK
The price of our Common Stock is volatile and may decline.
The trading price of our Common Stock may fluctuate widely as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control.
In addition, the stock market is subject to fluctuations in the share prices and trading volumes that affect the market prices of the shares
of many companies. These broad market fluctuations have adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect the market price of
our Common Stock. Among the factors that could affect our stock price are:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
actual or anticipated quarterly fluctuations in our operating results and financial condition;
changes in revenue or earnings estimates or publication of research reports and recommendations by financial analysts or
actions taken by rating agencies with respect to our securities or those of other financial institutions;
failure to meet analysts’ revenue or earnings estimates;
speculation in the press or investment community;
strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;
actions by institutional shareholders;
fluctuations in the stock price and operating results of our competitors;
general market conditions and, in particular, developments related to market conditions for the financial services industry;
proposed or adopted regulatory changes or developments, including changes in accounting policies;
anticipated or pending investigations, proceedings or litigation that involve or affect us; or
domestic and international economic factors unrelated to our performance.
A significant decline in our stock price could result in substantial losses for individual shareholders and could lead to costly and
disruptive securities litigation.
Securities issued by us, including our Common Stock, are not FDIC insured.
Securities issued by us, including our Common Stock, are not savings or deposit accounts or other obligations of any bank and are not
insured by the FDIC, the Deposit Insurance Fund or any other governmental agency or instrumentality, or any private insurer, and are
subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.
23
We may issue debt and equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, any of which may be senior to our Common
Stock as to distributions and in liquidation, which could negatively affect the value of our Common Stock.
In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by entering into debt or debt-like financing that is unsecured or secured
by up to all of our assets, or by issuing additional debt or equity securities, which could include issuances of secured or unsecured
commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior notes, subordinated notes, preferred stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable
for equity securities. In the event of our liquidation, our lenders and holders of our debt and preferred securities would receive a
distribution of our available assets before distributions to the holders of our Common Stock. Because our decision to incur debt and
issue securities in our future offerings will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or
estimate with certainty the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings and debt financings. Further, market conditions could require
us to accept less favorable terms for the issuance of our securities in the future.
You may not receive dividends on the Common Stock.
Holders of our Common Stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our Board of Directors may declare out of funds legally
available for such payments. In 2010, in response to anticipated increases in corporate risks, our Board suspended the payment of
dividends on our Common Stock. In 2014, our Board reinstated the payment of dividends on our Common Stock.
Sales of a significant number of shares of our Common Stock in the public markets, or the perception of such sales, could depress
the market price of our Common Stock.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock in the public markets and the availability of those shares for sale could
adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. In addition, future issuances of equity securities, including pursuant to
outstanding options, could dilute the interests of our existing shareholders and could cause the market price of our Common Stock to
decline. We may issue such additional equity or convertible securities to raise additional capital. Depending on the amount offered and
the levels at which we offer the stock, issuances of common or preferred stock could be substantially dilutive to shareholders of our
Common Stock. Moreover, to the extent that we issue restricted stock, phantom shares, stock appreciation rights, options or warrants to
purchase our Common Stock in the future and those stock appreciation rights, options or warrants are exercised or as shares of the
restricted stock vest, our shareholders may experience further dilution. Holders of our shares of Common Stock have no preemptive
rights that entitle holders to purchase their pro rata share of any offering of shares of any class or series and, therefore, such sales or
offerings could result in increased dilution to our shareholders. We cannot predict with certainty the effect that future sales of our
Common Stock would have on the market price of our Common Stock.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company’s corporate headquarters is located at 310 First St. SE, Moultrie, Georgia 31768. The Company occupies approximately
6,300 square feet at this location plus an additional 37,248 square feet used for support services for banking operations, including credit,
sales and operational support, as well as audit and loan review services. In addition to its corporate headquarters, Ameris operates 73
office or branch locations, of which 60 are owned and 13 are subject to either building or ground leases, and nine mortgage production
offices, all of which are subject to building leases. At December 31, 2014, there were no significant encumbrances on the offices,
equipment or other operational facilities owned by Ameris and the Bank.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, the Company and the Bank are parties to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business operations.
Management, after consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that current litigation will have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s financial position or results of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
24
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Price of Common Stock
The Common Stock is listed on NASDAQ under the symbol “ABCB”. The following table sets forth: (i) the high and low sales prices
for the Common Stock as quoted on NASDAQ during 2014 and 2013, as adjusted for stock dividends; and (ii) the amount of quarterly
dividends declared on the Common Stock during the periods indicated. The high and low sales prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without
retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
Quarter Ended 2014
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31
Quarter Ended 2013
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31
High
Low
Dividend
$ 24.00
23.90
24.04
26.48
$19.86
19.73
21.00
21.95
-
0.05
0.05
0.05
High
Low
Dividend
$ 14.51
16.94
19.79
21.42
$12.79
13.16
17.35
17.69
-
-
-
-
Dividends
The amount of and nature of any dividends declared on our Common Stock in the future will be determined by our Board of Directors
in its sole discretion. The Board reinstated a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share per quarter in June 2014. The Company is
required to comply with the restrictions on the payment of dividends in respect of the Common Stock discussed in the section of Part I,
Item 1 of this Annual Report captioned “Payment of Dividends and Other Restrictions.”
Holders of Common Stock
As of February 28, 2015, there were approximately 2,197 holders of record of the Common Stock. The Company believes a portion of
Common Stock outstanding is held either in nominee name or street name brokerage accounts; therefore, the Company is unable to
determine the number of beneficial owners of the Common Stock.
25
Performance Graph
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the change in the cumulative total shareholder return on the Common Stock against the
cumulative return of the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S. Companies) index and the index of NASDAQ Bank Stocks for the five-year
period commencing December 31, 2009, and ending December 31, 2014. This line graph assumes an investment of $100 on
December 31, 2009, and reinvestment of dividends and other distributions to shareholders.
Pursuant to the regulations of the SEC, this performance graph is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not
to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
26
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents selected consolidated financial information for Ameris. The data set forth below is derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements of Ameris. Acquisitions, including the FDIC-assisted transactions completed between 2009 and 2012,
the acquisition of Prosperity in 2013 and the acquisition of Coastal in 2014, significantly affected the comparability of selected financial
data. Specifically, since the acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method, the assets of the acquired institutions were
recorded at their fair values, the excess purchase price over the net fair value of the assets was recorded as goodwill and the results of
operations for the business have been included in the Company’s results since the respective dates these acquisitions were
completed. Accordingly, the level of our assets and liabilities and our results of operations for these acquisitions have significantly
affected the Company’s financial position and results of operations. Discussion of these acquisitions can be found in the “Corporate
Restructuring and Business Combinations” section of Part I, Item 1. of this Annual Report and in Note 2, “Business Combinations,” and
Note 3, “Assets Acquired in FDIC-Assisted Acquisitions,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The selected financial
data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto
and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere herein.
2014
Year Ended December 31,
2011
2012
2013
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
2010
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets
Total non-covered loans
Covered assets (loans and OREO)
Investment securities available for sale
FDIC loss-share receivable, net of clawback
Total deposits
Stockholders’ equity
$ 4,037,077
2,564,120
291,186
541,805
31,351
3,431,149
366,028
$ 3,667,649
2,067,207
436,130
486,235
65,441
2,999,231
316,699
$ 3,019,052
1,450,635
595,985
346,909
159,724
2,624,663
279,017
$ 2,994,307
1,332,086
650,106
339,967
242,394
2,591,566
293,770
$ 2,972,168
1,374,757
609,922
322,581
177,187
2,535,426
273,407
Selected Average Balances:
Total assets
Total non-covered loans
Investment securities available for sale
Total deposits
Stockholders’ equity
$ 3,731,281
2,310,721
508,383
2,448,748
316,400
$ 2,848,529
1,478,816
332,413
1,998,288
277,173
$ 2,971,960
1,393,012
369,734
2,150,729
293,400
$ 2,965,799
1,348,557
338,736
2,247,163
282,523
$ 2,492,296
1,448,662
259,652
1,910,658
242,849
Selected Income Statement Data:
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
$ 164,566
14,680
149,886
$ 126,322
10,137
116,185
$ 129,479
15,074
114,405
$ 141,071
27,547
113,524
$ 119,071
29,794
89,277
Provision for loan losses
Other income
Other expenses
Income/(loss) before income taxes
Income tax expense/(benefit)
Net income/(loss)
5,648
62,836
150,869
56,205
17,482
38,723
$
11,486
46,549
121,945
29,303
9,285
20,018
31,089
57,874
119,470
21,720
7,285
14,435
32,729
52,807
101,953
31,649
10,556
21,093
$
$
$
50,521
35,248
81,188
(7,184 )
(3,195 )
(3,989 )
$
Preferred stock dividends
286
1,738
3,577
3,241
3,213
Net income/(loss) available to common
shareholders
$
38,437
$
18,280
$
10,858
$
17,852
$
(7,202 )
Per Share Data:
Net income/(loss) – basic
Net income/(loss) – diluted
Common book value
Common dividends – cash
Common dividends – stock
$
$
1.48
1.46
13.67
0.15
-
$
$
0.76
0.75
11.50
-
-
0.46
0.46
10.56
-
-
0.76
0.76
10.23
-
-
$
(0.35 )
(0.35 )
9.44
-
3 for 157
27
2014
Year Ended December 31,
2011
2012
2013
2010
Profitability Ratios:
Net income (loss) to average total assets
Net income (loss) to average common stockholders’ equity
Net interest margin
Efficiency ratio
1.08%
12.40
4.59
70.92
0.70%
8.06
4.74
74.94
0.49%
5.99
4.60
69.35
0.60%
7.21
4.57
61.30
(0.37)%
(4.44)
4.11
65.20
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Loan Quality Ratios:
Net charge-offs to average loans*
Allowance for loan losses to total loans *
Nonperforming assets to total loans and OREO**
Liquidity Ratios:
Loans to total deposits
Average loans to average earnings assets
Noninterest-bearing deposits to total deposits
Capital Adequacy Ratios:
Stockholders’ equity to total assets
Common stock dividend payout ratio
* Excludes purchased non-covered and covered assets.
** Excludes covered assets.
0.34%
1.12
3.35
0.75%
1.38
3.49
2.87%
1.63
5.28
2.21%
2.64
8.76
3.45%
2.52
8.38
82.64%
80.22
24.46
81.94%
78.08
22.29
74.61%
77.83
19.46
73.45%
76.72
15.26
76.11%
76.50
11.91
9.07%
10.37
8.63%
9.24%
9.81%
9.20%
-
-
-
-
28
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
During 2014, the Company reported net income available to common shareholders of approximately $38.4 million, or $1.48 per share,
compared to $18.3 million, or $0.76 per share, in 2013. The Company’s net income as a percentage of average assets for 2014 and 2013
was 1.08% and 0.70%, respectively, while the Company’s net income as a percentage of average shareholders’ equity was 12.40% and
8.06%, respectively.
Highlights of the Company’s performance in 2014 include the following:
•
The Company completed the acquisition of Coastal, increasing total assets by approximately $449.0 million, total loans by
approximately $279.4 million and total deposits by approximately $369.0 million. The acquisition added six retail offices
and increased the Company’s presence in the Savannah, Georgia market. The Company recorded $27.4 million in additional
goodwill and $4.6 million in core deposit intangibles associated with the merger. A total of 1,598,998 shares of Common
Stock were issued to the former shareholders of Coastal.
• Non-accrual loans, excluding purchased loans, decreased approximately $7.5 million, or 25.6%, to $21.7 million during
2014. Legacy OREO (excluding purchased OREO and OREO sourced from purchased loans) decreased slightly from $33.4
million at December 31, 2013 to $33.2 million at December 31, 2014. Net charge-offs for 2014 declined to 0.31% of total
legacy loans, compared to 0.69% for 2013.
Total credit costs for the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased approximately $7.8 million, or 29.0%, compared to
2013. Credit costs include the loan loss provision, losses on the sale of problem loans or OREO and carrying costs associated
with problem loans or OREO, such as property taxes, legal expenses and maintenance. Provision for loan loss expense for
2014 amounted to approximately $5.6 million, compared to $11.5 million for 2013.
•
• Tangible common equity to tangible assets increased from 6.83% at December 31, 2013 to 7.42% at December 31, 2014.
Tangible common book value per share increased 11.3% from $9.87 at December 31, 2013 to $10.99 at December 31, 2014.
•
Total assets increased $369.4 million during 2014, ending the year at $4.0 billion. During 2014, the Company continued to
use the cash flows from covered assets (including loans, OREO and the indemnification asset from FDIC-assisted
acquisitions) to grow traditional earning assets. As such, the Company reduced covered assets by approximately $143.7
million and grew legacy loans by $271.4 million during 2014.
• Net income from the Company’s mortgage division increased 94.4% during 2014 to $6.2 million. Net income in the division
grew significantly faster than their rate of revenue growth, resulting from operating efficiencies in the division.
•
The Company’s net interest margin decreased slightly to 4.59% in 2014, from 4.74% in 2013. Lower yields on most earning
asset classes were offset by lower funding costs. Deposit costs, the Company’s largest funding expense, continued to decline
from 0.34% in 2013 to 0.30% in 2014, due to shifts in the deposit mix.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Ameris has established certain accounting and financial reporting policies to govern the application of accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies
are described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and
assumptions by management which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities; management considers
these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions used by management are based on historical
experience and other factors which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and
assumptions made by management, actual results could differ from the judgments and estimates adopted by management which could
have a material impact on the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the results of our operations. We believe the following
accounting policies applied by Ameris represent critical accounting policies.
Allowance for Loan Losses
We believe the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy that requires the most significant judgments and estimates used
in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable
incurred losses in the Company’s loan portfolio. Calculation of the allowance for loan losses represents a critical accounting estimate
due to the significant judgment, assumptions and estimates related to the amount and timing of estimated losses, consideration of
subjective environmental factors and the amount and timing of cash flows related to impaired loans.
29
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. While management uses available information to recognize losses
on loans, future additions to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition,
various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination processes, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan
losses. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance for loan losses based on their judgments about
information available to them at the time of their examination.
Considering current information and events regarding a borrower’s ability to repay its obligations, management considers a loan to be
impaired when the ultimate collectability of all amounts due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, is in doubt. When
a loan is considered to be impaired, the amount of impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or if the loan is collateral-dependent, the fair value of the collateral is used to determine
the amount of impairment. Impairment losses are included in the allowance for loan losses through a charge to the provision for losses
on loans.
Subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses. Cash receipts for accruing loans are applied to principal and interest
under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Cash receipts on impaired loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued
are applied first to principal and then to interest income.
Certain economic and interest rate factors could have a material impact on the determination of the allowance for loan losses. An
improving economy could result in the expansion of businesses and creation of jobs which would positively affect our loan growth and
improve our gross revenue stream. Conversely, certain factors could result from an expanding economy which could increase our credit
costs and adversely impact our net earnings. A significant rapid rise in interest rates could create higher borrowing costs and shrinking
corporate profits which could have a material impact on a borrower’s ability to pay. We will continue to concentrate on maintaining a
high quality loan portfolio through strict administration of our loan policy.
Another factor that we have considered in the determination of the allowance for loan losses is loan concentrations to individual
borrowers or industries. At December 31, 2014, we had one non-covered loan with an outstanding balance of $15.1 million, which
exceeded our in-house credit limit of $15.0 million. We also had four relationships consisting of 18 different non-covered loans that
exceeded our $15.0 million in-house credit limit. Total exposure resulting from these four relationships was $88.9 million. Additional
disclosure concerning the Company’s largest loan relationships is provided below.
A substantial portion of our loan portfolio is in the commercial real estate and residential real estate sectors. Those loans are secured by
real estate in our primary market areas. A substantial portion of OREO is located in those same markets. Therefore, the ultimate
collectability of a substantial portion of our loan portfolio and the recoverability of a substantial portion of the carrying amount of OREO
are susceptible to changes to market conditions in our primary market area.
Fair Value Accounting Estimates
GAAP requires the use of fair values in determining the carrying values of certain assets and liabilities, as well as for specific disclosures.
The most significant include impaired loans, OREO, and the net assets acquired in business combinations. Certain of these assets do not
have a readily available market to determine fair value and require an estimate based on specific parameters. When market prices are
unavailable, we determine fair values utilizing estimates, which are constantly changing, including interest rates, duration, prepayment
speeds and other specific conditions. In most cases, these specific parameters require a significant amount of judgment by management.
At December 31, 2014, the percentage of the Company’s assets measured at fair value was 18%. See Note 22, “Fair Value of Financial
Instruments,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements herein for additional disclosures regarding the fair value of our assets
and liabilities.
When a loan is considered impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at the
present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely
from the collateral. In addition, foreclosed assets are carried at the net realizable value, following foreclosure. The Company’s impaired
loans and foreclosed property are concentrated in markets and areas where the determination of fair value through market research
(recent sales and/or qualified appraisals) is difficult. Accordingly, the determination of fair value in the current environment is difficult
and more subjective than it would be in traditionally stable real estate environments. Although management believes its processes for
determining the value of these assets are appropriate and allow Ameris to arrive at a fair value, the processes require management
judgment and assumptions and the value of such assets at the time they are revalued or divested may be different from management’s
determination of fair value.
30
Business Combinations
Assets purchased and liabilities assumed in a business combination are recorded at their fair value. The fair value of a loan portfolio
acquired in a business combination requires greater levels of management estimates and judgment than the remainder of purchased
assets or assumed liabilities. On the date of acquisition, when the loans have evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is
probable at the date of acquisition that the Company will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments, the
difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred
to as the non-accretable difference. The Company must estimate expected cash flows at each reporting date. Subsequent decreases to
the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses. Subsequent increases in cash flows result in a reversal of the
provision for loan losses to the extent of prior charges and adjusted accretable yield which will have a positive impact on interest income.
In addition, purchased loans without evidence of credit deterioration are also handled under this method.
Income Taxes
GAAP requires the asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for deferred income taxes. We use the asset and
liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provide deferred income taxes for all significant income tax temporary
differences. See Note 16, “Income Taxes,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the
jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary
differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as gains on FDIC-assisted transactions and the provision for loan losses,
for tax and financial reporting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are included in our consolidated
balance sheet.
We must also assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the extent we believe
that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Significant management judgment is required in determining our
provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax
assets. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or adjust this allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax
provisions in the statement of income.
We have recorded on our consolidated balance sheet net deferred tax assets of $17.8 million as of December 31, 2014, compared to
$16.5 million at December 31, 2013. Purchase accounting adjustments related to the Coastal and Prosperity acquisitions, totaling $12.4
million, net operating loss carryforwards, totaling $12.1 million, and allowances for loan losses associated with loans where no loss has
yet been recorded for tax purposes, totaling $7.4 million, represent the Company’s largest deferred tax assets. Deferred gains on FDIC-
assisted transactions, totaling $8.8 million, and purchase accounting adjustments related to the Coastal and Prosperity acquisitions,
totaling $7.2 million, represent the Company’s largest deferred tax liabilities.
Long-Lived Assets, Including Intangibles
During 2014, the Bank recorded new goodwill totaling $27.4 million related to the acquisition of Coastal. During 2013, the Bank
recorded new goodwill totaling $34.1 million related to the acquisition of Prosperity. The Company recorded an additional $1.1 million
of goodwill during 2014 related to Prosperity, for total goodwill recorded of $35.2 million in the Prosperity acquisition. At December
31, 2014, the Company’s balance of intangible assets totaled $8.2 million and is being amortized over its previously determined useful
life. During 2014, the Bank recorded new core deposit intangibles totaling $4.6 million in the acquisition of Coastal, and during 2013,
the Bank recorded new core deposit intangibles totaling $4.4 million in the acquisition of Prosperity.
NET INCOME/(LOSS) AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company’s net income available to common shareholders during 2014 was approximately $38.4 million, or $1.46 per diluted share,
compared to $18.3 million, or $0.75 per diluted share, in 2013, and $10.9 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, in 2012.
For the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company recorded net income available to common shareholders of approximately $10.6 million, or
$0.39 per diluted share, compared to $966,000, or $0.04 per diluted share, for the quarter ended December 31, 2013, and $3.6 million,
or $0.15 per diluted share, for the quarter ended December 31, 2012.
31
EARNING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Average earning assets were approximately $3.30 billion in 2014, compared to approximately $2.47 billion in 2013. The earning asset
and interest-bearing liability mix is regularly monitored to maximize the net interest margin and, therefore, increase return on assets and
shareholders’ equity.
The following statistical information should be read in conjunction with the remainder of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operation” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
Annual Report and in the documents incorporated herein by reference.
The following tables set forth the amount of our interest income or interest expense for each category of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities and the average interest rate for total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net interest
spread and net interest margin on average interest-earning assets. Federally tax-exempt income is presented on a taxable-equivalent
basis assuming a 35% federal tax rate.
2014
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Yield/
Rate Paid
Average
Balance
Year Ended December 31,
2013
Interest
Income/
Expense
(Dollars in Thousands)
Average
Yield/
Rate Paid
Average
Balance
2012
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Yield/
Rate Paid
Average
Balance
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Mortgage loans held for sale $
Loans
Purchased non-covered loans
Covered loans
Investment securities
Short-term assets
71,231 $ 2,593
1,753,013 87,727
557,708 40,020
339,417 21,355
508,383 14,281
244
73,715
3.64% $ 110,542 $ 3,883
1,478,816 80,005
5.00
11,065
7.18
570
440,923 33,587
6.29
9,041
332,413
2.81
278
98,945
0.33
3.51% $
5.41
5.15
7.62
2.72
0.28
29,194 $ 1,058
1,393,012 77,772
-
-
553,657 40,590
369,734 10,241
444
155,501
3.62%
5.58
-
7.33
2.77
0.29
Total interest-
earning assets
3,303,467 166,220
5.03
2,472,704 127,364
5.15
2,501,098 130,105
5.20
Noninterest-earning
assets
427,814
Total assets
$ 3,731,281
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
375,825
$ 2,848,529
470,862
$ 2,971,960
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings and interest-
bearing demand deposits
Time deposits
Other borrowings
FHLB advances
Subordinated deferrable interest
$ 1,680,328 $ 4,435
5,054
1,924
140
768,420
86,986
46,986
0.26% $ 1,327,205 $ 3,521
4,878
671,083
0.66
307
28,935
2.21
63
2,400
0.30
0.27% $ 1,320,188 $ 4,556
8,771
830,541
0.73
155
26,563
1.06
110
3,635
2.63
0.35%
1.06
0.58
3.03
debentures
60,298
3,127
5.19
43,276
1,368
3.16
42,269
1,482
3.51
Total interest-bearing
liabilities
2,643,018 14,680
0.56
2,072,899 10,137
0.49
2,223,196 15,074
0.68
Demand deposits
Other liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
751,874
19,989
316,400
489,613
8,844
277,173
447,111
8,253
293,400
Total liabilities and
stockholders’
equity
Interest rate spread
Net interest income
Net interest margin
$ 3,731,281
$ 2,848,529
$ 2,971,960
$ 151,540
4.47%
4.59%
32
$ 117,227
4.66%
4.74%
$ 115,031
4.52%
4.60%
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Net interest income represents the amount by which interest income on interest-earning assets exceeds interest expense incurred on
interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is the largest component of our income and is affected by the interest rate environment
and the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Our interest-earning assets include loans,
investment securities, interest-bearing deposits in banks and federal funds sold. Our interest-bearing liabilities include deposits, other
short-term borrowings, FHLB advances and subordinated debentures.
2014 compared to 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2014, interest income was $164.6 million, an increase of $38.2 million, or
30.3%, compared to the same period in 2013. Average earning assets increased $830.8 million, or 33.6%, to $3.30 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2014, compared to $2.47 billion as of December 31, 2013. Yield on average earning assets on a taxable equivalent
basis decreased during 2014 to 5.03%, compared to 5.15% for the year ended December 31, 2013. However, lower yields on most
earning assets have been offset by lower funding costs.
Interest expense on deposits and other borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $14.7 million, compared to $10.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company’s funding mix continued to improve during 2014, leading to savings in cost of
funds. During 2014, average noninterest-bearing accounts amounted to $751.9 million and comprised 23.5% of average total deposits,
compared to $489.6 million, or 19.7% of average total deposits, during 2013. Average balances of time deposits amounted to $768.4
million and comprised 24.0% of average total deposits during 2014, compared to $671.1 million, or 27.0% of average total deposits,
during 2013.
On a taxable-equivalent basis, net interest income for 2014 was $151.5 million compared to $117.2 million in 2013, an increase of $34.3
million, or 29.3%. The Company’s net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, decreased to 4.59% for the year ended December 31,
2014, compared to 4.74% for the year ended December 31, 2013.
2013 compared to 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2013, interest income was $126.3 million, a decrease of $3.2 million, or
2.4%, compared to the same period in 2012. Average earning assets decreased $28.4 million, or 1.14%, to $2.47 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2013, compared to $2.50 billion as of December 31, 2012. Yield on average earning assets on a taxable equivalent
basis decreased during 2013 to 5.15%, compared to 5.20% for the year ended December 31, 2012. However, lower yields on most
earning assets have been offset by lower funding costs.
Interest expense on deposits and other borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $10.1 million, compared to $15.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2012. The Company’s funding mix continued to improve during 2013, leading to significant savings
in cost of funds. During 2013, average noninterest-bearing accounts amounted to $489.6 million and comprised 19.7% of average total
deposits, compared to $447.1 million, or 17.2% of average total deposits, during 2012. Average balances of time deposits amounted to
$671.1 million and comprised 27.0% of average total deposits during 2013, compared to $830.5 million, or 32.0% of average total
deposits, during 2012. This shift of balances from higher cost time deposits into noninterest-bearing accounts helped reduce the cost of
average interest-bearing liabilities from 0.68% in 2012 to 0.49% in 2013.
On a taxable-equivalent basis, net interest income for 2013 was $117.2 million compared to $115.0 million in 2012, an increase of $2.2
million, or 1.91%. The Company’s net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, increased to 4.74% for the year ended December 31,
2013, compared to 4.60% for the year ended December 31, 2012.
33
The summary of changes in interest income and interest expense on a fully taxable equivalent basis resulting from changes in volume
and changes in rates for each category of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
are shown in the following table:
2014 vs. 2013
Changes Due To
Rate
Volume
Increase
(Decrease)
2013 vs. 2012
Changes Due to
Rate
Volume
Increase (decrease) in:
Increase
(Decrease)
Income from earning assets:
Interest on mortgage loans held for sale $ (1,290) $
Interest and fees on loans
Interest on purchased non-covered loans
Interest on covered loans
Interest on securities
Short-term assets
7,722
39,450
(12,232)
5,240
(34)
38,856
91
(7,112)
11,290
(4,500)
454
37
260
(Dollars in Thousands)
$(1,381)
14,834
28,160
(7,732)
4,786
(71)
38,596
$ 2,825
2,233
570
(7,003)
(1,200)
(166)
(2,741)
$
(123)
(2,557)
-
1,262
(166)
(5)
(1,589)
$ 2,948
4,790
570
(8,265)
(1,034)
(161)
(1,152)
Total interest income
Expense from interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest on savings and interest-bearing demand
deposits
Interest on time deposits
Interest on other borrowings
Interest on FHLB advances
Interest on trust preferred securities
Total interest expense
914
176
1,617
77
1,759
4,543
(23)
(532)
1,001
(1,093)
1,221
574
937
708
616
1,170
538
3,969
(1,035)
(3,893)
152
(47)
(114)
(4,937)
(1,059)
(2,209)
138
(10)
(149)
(3,289)
24
(1,684)
14
(37)
35
(1,648)
Net interest income
$ 34,313
$
(314)
$34,627
$ 2,196
$ 1,700
$
496
Provision for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. The provision
for loan losses is based on management’s evaluation of the size and composition of the loan portfolio, the level of non-performing and
past due loans, historical trends of charged-off loans and recoveries, prevailing economic conditions and other factors management
deems appropriate. As these factors change, the level of loan loss provision may change.
The Company’s provision for loan losses during 2014 amounted to $5.6 million, compared to $11.5 million for 2013 and $31.1 million
in 2012. Net charge-offs in 2014 were 0.31% of average loans, excluding the loans covered in the FDIC-loss sharing agreements,
compared to 0.69% in 2013 and 2.76% in 2012.
At December 31, 2014, non-performing assets, excluding assets covered in the FDIC-loss sharing agreements, amounted to $87.5
million, or 2.17% of total assets, compared to 2.00% at December 31, 2013. Legacy non-performing assets totaled $54.9 million and
acquired, non-covered non-performing assets totaled $32.6 million at December 31, 2014. Legacy other real estate was approximately
$33.2 million as of December 31, 2014, reflecting a slight decrease from the $33.4 million reported at December 31, 2013. Purchased,
non-covered other real estate was $15.6 million at December 31, 2014, compared to $4.3 million at December 31, 2013. The Company’s
allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2014 was $21.2 million, or 1.12% of loans, excluding purchased non-covered and covered
loans, compared to $22.4 million, or 1.38%, and $23.6 million, or 1.63%, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
34
Noninterest Income
Following is a comparison of noninterest income for 2014, 2013 and 2012.
Service charges on deposit accounts
Mortgage banking activities
Other service charges, commissions and fees
Gain on sales of securities
Gain on acquisitions
Gain on sale of SBA loans
Other income
2014
Years Ended December 31,
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 19,545
19,128
2,151
$ 24,614
25,986
2,647
2012
$ 19,576
12,989
1,431
138
-
3,896
5,555
$ 62,836
171
-
1,500
4,054
$ 46,549
322
20,037
264
3,255
$ 57,874
2014 compared to 2013. Total noninterest income in 2014 was $62.8 million, compared to $46.5 million in 2013, an increase of $16.3
million. The majority of this increase relates to a $6.9 million increase in mortgage banking activity, a $5.1 million increase in service
charges on deposit accounts, a $3.9 million increase in other income, and a $496,000 increase in other service charges.
Income from mortgage banking activities increased substantially during 2013, from $19.1 million in 2013 to $26.0 million in 2014, as
the Company’s mortgage division reached a mature stage with a team of long-tenured mortgage bankers producing reliable results.
Other income increased $3.9 million, or 70.2%, from $5.6 million in 2013 to $9.5 million in 2014. The Company’s recent efforts to
build a SBA division resulted in significant gains in revenue and net income. During 2014, the Company recorded $3.9 million of gains
on sales of SBA loans and $1.0 million of SBA servicing fee income, compared to gains on sales of SBA loans of $1.5 million and SBA
servicing fee income of $611,000 in 2013.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased 25.9% in 2014, the result of acquisition activity as well as successful efforts on
commercial deposit accounts. Since 2011, the Company has devoted significant resources to both treasury deposit products and treasury
sales professionals, which contributed significantly to the Company’s growth in non-interest bearing deposits.
2013 compared to 2012. Total noninterest income in 2013 was $46.5 million, compared to $57.9 million in 2012, a decrease of $11.3
million. Excluding the gain on acquisition recorded in 2012, total noninterest income increased $8.7 million. The majority of this
increase relates to a $6.1 million increase in mortgage banking activity, a $2.0 million increase in other income, and a $720,000 increase
in other service charges.
Other income increased 57.8%, from $3.5 million in 2012 to $5.6 million in 2013. This increase is due to increased earnings on bank
owned life insurance and a $1.2 million increase in the gain on the sale of SBA loans in 2013.
Income from mortgage banking activities continued to increase during 2013, from $13.0 million in 2012 to $19.1 million in 2013, as
the Company continued to grow the line of business through the addition of new producers and new services.
Service charges on deposit accounts remained stable during 2013, while other service charges, commissions and fees increased 50.3%
in 2013, from $1.4 million in 2012, to $2.2 million in 2013. Service charges on deposit accounts represent the largest component of
recurring noninterest income. In 2013, excluding gains on securities and on acquisitions, service charges were 42% of total noninterest
income, compared to 52% in 2012.
35
Noninterest Expense
Following is a comparison of noninterest expense for 2014, 2013 and 2012.
2014
Salaries and employee benefits
Equipment and occupancy
Amortization of intangible assets
Data processing and communication costs
Advertising and public relations
Postage & delivery
Printing & supplies
Legal fees
Other professional fees
Directors fees
FDIC assessments
Acquisition expenses
OREO and problem loan expenses
Other expense
Years Ended December 31,
2013
2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 56,670
12,286
1,414
11,539
1,620
1,017
962
615
1,526
722
2,323
4,350
15,486
11,415
$121,945
$ 53,122
13,208
1,360
10,683
1,622
1,061
1,460
721
1,925
475
1,489
2,125
22,416
7,803
$119,470
$ 73,878
17,521
2,330
15,551
2,869
1,392
1,331
743
2,349
810
2,972
3,940
13,506
11,677
$150,869
2014 compared to 2013. Operating expenses increased from $121.9 million in 2013 to $150.9 million in 2014. The primary drivers of
the increase in operating expenses are the increased number of branch locations and continued growth and expansion in the Company’s
mortgage and SBA divisions. Salaries and employee benefits increased 30.4% from $56.7 million in 2013 to $73.9 million in 2014.
Equipment and occupancy expense increased 42.6% from $12.3 million in 2013 to $17.5 million in 2014. Data processing and
telecommunications expense increased during 2014 to $15.6 million, an increase of 34.8% compared to the $11.5 million reported in
2013. Advertising and public relations increased $1.2 million during 2014, as the Company incurred these costs to support various
revenue and growth strategies throughout the year. Postage and delivery, printing and supplies, legal fees and other professional fees
all increased during 2014 to support the increases assets of the Company.
Acquisition expenses of $3.9 million in 2014 relate to the Coastal acquisition, compared to the $4.4 million recorded in 2013 related to
the Prosperity acquisition. Problem loan and OREO expenses decreased $2.0 million in 2014, as the level of OREO and problem loans
declined and general economic conditions improved. Excluding acquisition and credit related expenses, total operating expenses were
$133.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $102.1 million for 2013. Expressed as a percentage of average
assets, total operating expense net of credit related and non-recurring acquisition costs in 2013 was 3.58%, a slight increase from 3.47%
reported in 2013.
2013 compared to 2012. Operating expenses increased from $119.5 million in 2012 to $121.9 million in 2013. Salaries and employee
benefits increased 6.7% from $53.1 million in 2012 to $56.7 million in 2013. Equipment and occupancy expense decreased 7.0% from
$13.2 million in 2012 to $12.3 million in 2013. Data processing and telecommunications expense increased during 2013 to $11.5
million, an increase of 8.0% compared to the $10.7 million reported in 2012. Postage and delivery, printing and supplies, legal fees and
other professional fees all decreased during 2013 due to the efforts to reduce core operating expenses.
Acquisition expenses of $4.4 million in 2013 relate to the Prosperity acquisition. Problem loan and OREO expenses decreased $6.9
million in 2013, as the level of OREO and problem loans declined and general economic conditions improved. Excluding acquisition
and credit related expenses, total operating expenses were $102.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to $97.1
million for 2012. Expressed as a percentage of average assets, total operating expense net of credit related and non-recurring acquisition
costs in 2013 was 3.47%, a slight increase from 3.25% reported in 2012.
36
Income Taxes
Federal income tax expense is influenced by the amount of taxable income, the amount of tax-exempt income and the amount of non-
deductible expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded income tax expense of approximately $17.5 million,
compared to $9.3 million recorded in 2013 and $7.3 million recorded in 2012. The Company’s effective tax rate was 31%, 32% and
34% for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
BALANCE SHEET COMPARISON
LOANS
Management believes that our loan portfolio is adequately diversified. The loan portfolio contains no foreign loans or significant
concentrations in any one industry. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 80.7% of our legacy loan portfolio was secured by real
estate. The amount of loans outstanding, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans, at the indicated dates is shown in the
following table according to type of loans.
2014
2013
December 31,
2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
2011
2010
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Other
Less allowance for loan losses
Loans, net
161,507
907,524
456,106
30,782
14,308
1,889,881
21,157
$ 319,654 $ 244,373 $ 174,217 $ 142,960 $ 142,312
162,594
683,974
344,830
34,293
6,754
1,374,757
34,576
$ 1,868,724 $ 1,596,077 $ 1,427,042 $ 1,296,930 $ 1,340,181
130,270
672,765
330,727
37,296
18,068
1,332,086
35,156
146,371
808,323
351,886
34,249
33,252
1,618,454
22,377
114,199
732,322
346,480
40,178
43,239
1,450,635
23,593
The following table provides additional disclosure on the various loan types comprising the subgroup “Real estate – commercial &
farmland” at December 31, 2014 (in thousands):
Owner-Occupied
Farmland
Apartments
Hotels / Motels
Auto Dealers
Offices / Office Buildings
Strip Centers (Anchored & Non-Anchored)
Convenience Stores
Retail Properties
Warehouse Properties
All Other
Outstanding
Balance
$ 301,314
142,334
60,252
43,512
5,724
95,116
80,760
11,889
99,567
49,868
17,188
$ 907,524
Average
Maturity
(Months)
Average Rate
% non-accrual
44
29
39
54
35
53
41
32
47
46
28
40
5.36%
5.47%
4.96%
5.14%
4.53%
5.23%
4.74%
5.42%
5.28%
5.40%
6.20%
5.39%
1.06%
0.38%
6.32%
-
-
0.05%
0.29%
-
0.15%
-
0.93%
0.90%
37
The amount of purchased, non-covered loans outstanding, at the indicated dates is shown in the following table according to type of
loans.
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Other
Total purchased, non-covered loans
2014
2013
December 31,
2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
2011
2010
$
38,041 $
58,362
306,706
266,342
4,788
-
32,141 $
31,176
179,898
200,851
4,687
-
$ 674,239 $ 448,753 $
- $
-
-
-
-
-
- $
- $
-
-
-
-
-
- $
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Assets Covered by Loss-Sharing Agreements with the FDIC - Loans that were acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions that are covered
by the loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC (“covered loans”) totaling $271.3 million and $390.2 million at December 31, 2014 and
2013, respectively, are not included in the preceding tables. OREO that is covered by the loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC totaled
$19.9 million and $45.9 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The loss-sharing agreements are subject to the servicing
procedures as specified in the agreements with the FDIC. The expected reimbursements under the loss-sharing agreements were recorded
as an indemnification asset at their estimated fair value at the respective acquisition dates. The FDIC loss-share receivable reported at
December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $31.4 million and $65.4 million, respectively.
The Company recorded the loans at their fair values, taking into consideration certain credit quality, risk and liquidity marks. If the
Company determines that a loan or group of loans has deteriorated from its initial assessment of fair value, the identified loss is charged
off and a provision for loan loss is recorded. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded
approximately $843,000, $1.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively, of provision for loan losses to account for decreases in estimated
cash flows on loans acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions. If the Company determines that a loan or group of loans has improved from
its initial assessment of fair value, the increase in cash flows over those expected at the acquisition date are recognized as interest income
prospectively. Covered loans are shown below according to loan type as of the end of the years shown (in thousands):
2014
2013
December 31,
2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
2011
2010
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Other
Total covered loans
$
21,467 $
23,447
147,627
78,520
218
-
47,309
89,781
257,428
149,226
11,247
-
$ 271,279 $ 390,237 $ 507,712 $ 571,489 $ 554,991
32,606 $
70,184
278,506
125,056
1,360
-
41,867 $
77,077
321,257
127,644
3,644
-
26,550 $
43,179
224,451
95,173
884
-
38
The Company seeks to diversify its loan portfolio across its geographic footprint and in various loan types. Also, the Company’s stated
in-house legal lending limit for a single loan is $15.0 million which would normally prevent a concentration with a single loan project.
Certain lending relationships may contain more than one loan and consequently, exceed the in-house lending limit. The Company
regularly monitors its largest loan relationships to avoid a concentration with a single borrower. The largest 25 loan relationships are
summarized below by type and compared to the Bank’s loan portfolio taken as a whole (in thousands):
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Total
Ameris Bank Loan Portfolio
Balance
Average Rate
Average
Maturity
(months)
% unsecured
% in non-
accrual status
$
73,748
14,470
113,226
19,147
$ 220,591
$ 1,889,881
3.20%
4.21%
4.29%
3.81%
4.03%
6.25%
90
35
58
134
65
24
55.7%
-
-
-
18.6%
4.2%
-
-
-
-
-
1.15%
Total legacy loans, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans, as of December 31, 2014 are shown in the following table
according to their contractual maturity:
One Year or
Less
Contractual Maturity in:
Over One Year
through Five
Years
(Dollars in Thousands)
Over Five
Years
Total
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Other
$ 96,032
54,360
151,275
161,633
6,842
14,308
$ 484,450
$
$
118,512
86,280
501,044
183,824
23,026
-
912,686
$ 105,110
20,867
255,205
110,649
914
-
$ 492,745
$ 319,654
161,507
907,524
456,106
30,782
14,308
$ 1,889,881
The following table summarizes loans at December 31, 2014, with maturity dates after one year which (i) have predetermined interest
rates and (ii) have floating or adjustable interest rates.
Predetermined interest rates
Floating or adjustable interest rates
Purchased loans as of December 31, 2014, are shown below according to their contractual maturity:
(Dollars in
Thousands)
$ 1,055,109
350,322
$ 1,405,431
Purchased, non-covered loans
Covered loans
Total Purchased loans
One Year or
Less
Contractual Maturity in:
Over One Year
through Five
Years
(Dollars in Thousands)
Over Five
Years
Total
$ 88,317
143,816
$ 232,133
$ 204,030
99,972
$ 304,002
$381,892
27,491
$409,383
$ 674,239
271,279
$ 945,518
39
ALLOWANCE AND PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
The allowance for loan losses represents a reserve for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for
loan losses is evaluated periodically based on a review of all significant loans, with a particular emphasis on non-accruing, past due and
other loans that management believes might be potentially impaired or warrant additional attention. We segregate our loan portfolio by
type of loan and utilize this segregation in evaluating exposure to risks within the portfolio. In addition, based on internal reviews and
external reviews performed by independent loan reviewers and regulatory authorities, we further segregate our loan portfolio by loan
grades based on an assessment of risk for a particular loan or group of loans. Certain reviewed loans are assigned specific allowances
when a review of relevant data determines that a general allocation is not sufficient or when the review affords management the
opportunity to fine tune the amount of exposure in a given credit. In establishing allowances, management considers historical loan loss
experience but adjusts this data with a significant emphasis on data such as current loan quality trends, current economic conditions and
other factors in the markets where the Bank operates. Factors considered include among others, current valuations of real estate in our
markets, unemployment rates, the effect of weather conditions on agricultural related entities and other significant local economic events,
such as major plant closings.
We have developed a methodology for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses which is monitored by the Company’s
Chief Credit Officer. Procedures provide for the assignment of a risk rating for every loan included in our total loan portfolio, with the
exception of credit card receivables and overdraft protection loans which are treated as pools for risk rating purposes. The risk rating
schedule provides nine ratings of which five ratings are classified as pass ratings and four ratings are classified as criticized ratings.
Each risk rating is assigned a percent factor to be applied to the loan balance to determine the adequate amount of allowance. Many of
the larger loans require an annual review by an independent loan officer and are often reviewed by independent third parties. As a result
of these loan reviews, certain loans may be assigned specific allowance allocations. Other loans that surface as problem loans may also
be assigned specific allowance allocations. Past due loans are assigned risk ratings based on the number of days past due. The calculation
of the allowance for loan losses, including underlying data and assumptions, is reviewed regularly by the Company’s Chief Financial
Officer and the independent internal loan review department.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category for the periods indicated. Management
believes the allowance can be allocated only on an approximate basis. The allocation of the allowance to each category is not necessarily
indicative of future losses and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in any other category.
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural
R/E Commercial &
Farmland
R/E Construction &
Development
Total Commercial
R/E Residential
Consumer Installment
Unallocated
2014
2013
% of
Loans
to
Total
Loans
% of
Loans
to
Total
Loans
Amount
Amount
At December 31,
2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
% of
Loans
to
Total
Loans
Amount
2011
2010
Amount
% of
Loans
to
Total
Loans
11
%
% of
Loans
to
Total
Loans
Amount
$ 2,779
10%
$ 2,004
17% $ 1,823
15% $ 2,439 12% $ 2,918
8,823
48
8,393
50
9,157 50
14,226 50 14,971
50
5,030
15,857
4,129
1,171
-
9
74
24
2
-
5,538
15,754
6,034
589
-
9
74
22
4
-
8
5,343
16,939 70
5,898 24
6
756
-
-
12
9,438 10 7,705
26,582 71 25,455 72
8,128 25 8,664 25
3
4
-
-
446
-
457
-
$ 21,157
100% $ 22,377 100% $ 23,593 100% $ 35,156
100
%
$ 34,576 100%
40
The following table presents an analysis of our loan loss experience, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans, for the periods
indicated:
Average amount of non-purchased
loans outstanding
Balance of allowance for loan losses at
beginning of period
Charge-offs:
Commercial real estate, financial
and agricultural
Residential real estate
Consumer Installment
Recoveries:
Commercial real estate, financial
and agricultural
Residential real estate
Consumer Installment
Net charge-offs
Additions to allowance charged to
operating expenses
Balance of allowance for loan
losses at end of period
Ratio of net loan charge-offs to average
non-purchased loans
2014
2013
December 31,
2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
2011
2010
$ 1,753,013
$ 1,478,816
$ 1,393,012
$ 1,348,557
$ 1,448,662
$
22,377
$
23,593
$
35,156
$
34,576
$
35,762
(5,447)
(1,707)
(471)
944
254
486
(5,941)
(7,350)
(5,215)
(719)
935
888
298
(11,163)
(31,382)
(8,722)
(1,059)
679
225
245
(40,014)
(25,475)
(5,399)
(749)
1,593
146
123
(29,761)
(41,442)
(10,091)
(1,090)
2,097
186
315
(50,025)
4,721
9,947
28,451
30,341
48,839
$
21,157
$
22,377
$
23,593
$
35,156
$
34,576
0.34%
0.75%
2.87%
2.21%
3.45%
NONPERFORMING LOANS
A loan is placed on non-accrual status when, in management’s judgment, the collection of the interest income appears doubtful. Interest
receivable that has been accrued in prior years and is subsequently determined to have doubtful collectability is charged to the allowance
for loan losses. Interest on loans that are classified as non-accrual is recognized when received. Past due loans are placed on non-accrual
status when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more. In some cases, where borrowers are experiencing financial difficulties,
loans may be restructured to provide terms significantly different from the original contractual terms. The following table presents an
analysis of loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans.
2014
2013
December 31,
2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
2011
2010
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Total
$ 1,672 $ 4,103 $ 4,138 $ 3,987 $ 8,648
7,887
55,170
6,376
1,208
$ 21,728 $ 29,203 $ 38,885 $ 70,823 $79,289
3,971
8,566
12,152
411
15,020
35,385
15,498
933
9,281
11,962
12,595
909
3,774
8,141
7,663
478
Loans contractually past due ninety days or more as to interest or
principal payments and still accruing
1
-
-
-
-
41
The following table presents an analysis of purchased, non-covered loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis.
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Total
2014
2013
December 31,
2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
2011
2010
$
175 $
1,119
10,242
6,644
69
11 $
325
1,653
4,658
12
$ 18,249 $ 6,659 $
- $
-
-
-
-
- $
- $
-
-
-
-
- $
-
-
-
-
-
-
The following table presents an analysis of covered loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis.
2014
2013
December 31,
2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
2011
2010
7,601
12,584
6,595
91
$ 8,541 $ 7,257 $ 10,765 $ 11,952 $ 5,756
25,810
20,027
29,519
55,946
25,946
28,672
1,122
302
$ 35,412 $ 69,152 $115,712 $159,999 $88,153
30,977
75,458
41,139
473
14,781
33,495
13,278
341
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Total
42
Troubled Debt Restructurings
The restructuring of a loan is considered a “troubled debt restructuring” if both (i) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and
(ii) the Company has granted a concession.
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had a balance of $15.3 million and $20.9 million, respectively, in troubled debt
restructurings, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans. The following table presents the amount of troubled debt
restructurings by loan class, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at
December 31, 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
As of December 31, 2013
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
#
6
9
19
47
11
92
#
4
8
17
37
6
72
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 290
679
6,477
5,258
55
$ 12,759
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 13
228
724
1,485
73
$ 2,523
#
2
5
3
11
11
32
Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 515
1,896
6,913
7,818
72
$ 17,214
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 525
32
2,273
834
19
$ 3,683
#
3
2
4
8
3
20
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class, excluding purchased non-covered and covered
loans, classified separately as those currently paying under restructured terms and those that have defaulted under restructured terms at
December 31, 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
As of December 31, 2013
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Loans Currently Paying
Under Restructured Terms
Loans that have Defaulted
Under Restructured Terms
#
7
9
19
45
14
94
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 67
679
6,477
5,036
67
$ 12,326
#
1
5
3
13
8
30
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 236
228
724
1,707
61
$ 2,956
Loans Currently Paying
Under Restructured Terms
Loans that have Defaulted
Under Restructured Terms
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 515
1,896
6,396
6,699
90
$ 15,596
#
3
2
5
13
2
25
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 525
32
2,789
1,953
2
$ 5,301
#
4
8
16
32
7
67
43
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans, by types
of concessions made, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans, by
collateral types, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans
Type of Concession:
Forbearance of Interest
Forgiveness of Principal
Forbearance of Principal
Rate Reduction Only
Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Interest
Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Principal
Rate Reduction, Forgiveness of Interest
Rate Reduction, Forgiveness of Principal
Total
As of December 31, 2013
Type of Concession:
Forbearance of Interest
Forgiveness of Principal
Payment Modification Only
Rate Reduction Only
Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Interest
Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Principal
Rate Reduction, Payment Modification
Total
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 1,917
2,394
165
3,677
2,160
1,981
460
5
$ 12,759
Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 2,170
1,467
280
7,069
3,252
2,976
-
$ 17,214
#
10
5
6
16
31
19
4
1
92
#
10
3
1
14
26
18
-
72
As of December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans
Collateral type:
Warehouse
Raw Land
Hotel & Motel
Office
Retail, including Strip Centers
1-4 Family Residential
Church
Automobile/Equipment/CD
Unsecured
Total
As of December 31, 2013
Collateral type:
Warehouse
Raw Land
Hotel & Motel
Office
Retail, including Strip Centers
1-4 Family Residential
Life Insurance Policy
Automobile/Equipment/Inventory
Unsecured
Total
#
6
11
3
4
4
47
1
14
2
92
#
4
11
3
4
4
36
1
8
1
72
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 933
1,046
2,041
1,634
1,203
5,203
361
97
241
$ 12,759
Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 1,346
2,345
2,185
1,909
1,095
7,747
250
92
245
$ 17,214
44
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 270
-
-
477
1,738
13
-
25
$ 2,523
$ 97
145
88
913
2,411
-
29
$ 3,683
$ -
292
-
-
660
1,501
-
70
-
$ 2,523
$ 592
32
-
-
1,680
852
-
479
48
$ 3,683
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
4
-
-
4
21
2
-
1
32
#
2
1
1
3
12
-
1
20
#
-
6
-
-
2
12
-
12
-
32
#
2
2
-
-
2
9
-
4
1
20
As of December 31, 2014, the Company had a balance of $1.2 million in troubled debt restructurings included in purchased non-
covered loans. The Company did not have any troubled debt restructurings included in purchased non-covered loans at December 31,
2013. The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class of purchased non-covered loans, classified
separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2014.
As of December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
#
-
1
1
6
1
9
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
317
346
547
2
$ 1,212
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
-
-
25
-
$ 25
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class of purchased non-covered loans, classified
separately as those currently paying under restructured terms and those that have defaulted under restructured terms at December 31,
2014.
As of December 31, 2014
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Loans Currently Paying
Under Restructured Terms
Loans that have Defaulted
Under Restructured Terms
#
-
-
1
5
6
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
-
346
480
-
$ 826
#
-
1
-
2
1
4
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
317
-
92
2
$ 411
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings included in purchased non-covered loans, by types of concessions
made, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2014.
As of December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans
Type of Concession:
Forbearance of Interest
Payment Modification Only
Rate Reduction Only
Rate Reduction, Forgiveness of Interest
Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Interest
Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Principal
Total
#
2
1
2
2
1
1
9
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 69
346
373
155
231
38
$ 1,212
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
-
25
-
-
-
$ 25
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings included in purchased non-covered loans, by collateral types,
classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2014.
As of December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans
Collateral type:
Warehouse
Raw Land
1-4 Family Residential
Automobile/Equipment/Inventory
Total
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 346
373
491
2
$ 1,212
#
1
2
5
1
9
45
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
-
25
-
$ 25
#
-
-
-
1
-
1
#
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
#
-
-
1
-
1
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had a balance of $24.6 million and $27.3 million, respectively, in troubled debt
restructurings included in covered loans. The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class of
covered loans, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
As of December 31, 2013
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 40
3,037
8,079
11,460
3
$ 22,619
Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 13
3,256
7,255
11,719
-
$ 22,243
#
2
4
14
96
1
117
#
1
3
13
83
-
100
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
29
1,082
831
-
$ 1,942
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 71
52
3,946
942
10
$ 5,021
#
2
2
5
8
-
17
#
5
4
5
8
2
24
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class of covered loans, classified separately as those
currently paying under restructured terms and those that have defaulted under restructured terms at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014
Loans Currently Paying
Under Restructured Terms
Loans that have Defaulted
Under Restructured Terms
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
#
4
4
18
79
1
106
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 40
3,037
9,082
9,897
3
$ 22,059
#
-
2
1
25
-
28
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
29
79
2,394
-
$ 2,502
As of December 31, 2013
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Loans Currently Paying
Under Restructured Terms
Loans that have Defaulted
Under Restructured Terms
#
5
5
15
68
2
95
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 45
3,273
7,543
9,206
10
$ 20,077
#
1
2
3
23
-
29
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 40
34
3,658
3,455
-
$ 7,187
46
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings included in covered loans, by types of concessions made,
classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings included in covered loans, by collateral types, classified
separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans
Type of Concession:
Forbearance of Interest
Forbearance of Principal
Rate Reduction Only
Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Interest
Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Principal
Rate Reduction, Forgiveness of Interest
Total
As of December 31, 2013
Type of Concession:
Forbearance of Interest
Rate Reduction Only
Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Interest
Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Principal
Rate Reduction, Payment Modification
Total
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 1,532
-
17,360
274
3,052
401
$ 22,619
Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
18,687
88
2,613
855
$ 22,243
#
3
1
97
5
8
3
117
#
-
89
3
7
1
100
As of December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans
Collateral type:
Warehouse
Raw Land
Hotel & Motel
Office
Retail, including Strip Centers
1-4 Family Residential
Automobile/Equipment/Inventory
Unsecured
Total
As of December 31, 2013
Collateral type:
Warehouse
Raw Land
Hotel & Motel
Office
Retail, including Strip Centers
1-4 Family Residential
Automobile/Equipment/Inventory
Unsecured
Total
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 1,510
411
4,395
473
4,174
11,616
3
37
$ 22,619
Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
375
5,118
855
3,853
12,029
-
13
$ 22,243
#
2
3
5
1
6
98
1
1
117
#
-
1
6
1
6
85
-
1
100
47
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 88
-
1,626
14
214
-
$ 1,942
$ 98
953
478
3,492
-
$ 5,021
$ 79
14
-
858
145
846
-
-
$ 1,942
$ 377
37
155
78
3,337
966
71
-
$ 5,021
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
#
3
1
7
3
3
-
17
#
3
9
8
4
-
24
#
1
1
-
2
2
9
2
-
17
#
1
3
1
1
2
11
5
-
24
LIQUIDITY AND INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
Liquidity management involves the matching of the cash flow requirements of customers, who may be either depositors desiring to
withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs, and the ability of our
Company to meet those needs. We seek to meet liquidity requirements primarily through management of short-term investments
(principally interest-bearing deposits in banks) and monthly amortizing loans. Another source of liquidity is the repayment of maturing
single payment loans. In addition, our Company maintains relationships with correspondent banks, including the FHLB and the Federal
Reserve Bank of Atlanta, which could provide funds on short notice, if needed.
A principal objective of our asset/liability management strategy is to minimize our exposure to changes in interest rates by matching the
maturity and repricing horizons of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. This strategy is overseen in part through the
direction of our Asset and Liability Committee (the “ALCO Committee”) which establishes policies and monitors results to control
interest rate sensitivity.
As part of our interest rate risk management policy, the ALCO Committee examines the extent to which its assets and liabilities are
“interest rate sensitive” and monitors its interest rate-sensitivity “gap.” An asset or liability is considered to be interest rate sensitive if
it will reprice or mature within the time period analyzed, usually one year or less. The interest rate-sensitivity gap is the difference
between the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities scheduled to mature or reprice within such time period. A gap is
considered positive when the amount of interest rate-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities. A gap is
considered negative when the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds the interest rate-sensitive assets. During a period of
rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an
increase in net interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest
income, while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income. If our assets and liabilities were equally flexible and
moved concurrently, the impact of any increase or decrease in interest rates on net interest income would be minimal.
A simple interest rate “gap” analysis by itself may not be an accurate indicator of how net interest income will be affected by changes
in interest rates. Accordingly, the ALCO Committee also evaluates how the repayment of particular assets and liabilities is impacted by
changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be
affected uniformly by changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant
impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing,
they may not react identically to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in
advance of changes in general market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In
addition, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as “interest rate caps”) which limit
changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and
early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the interest rate gap. The ability of many
borrowers to service their debts also may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase.
We manage the mix of asset and liability maturities in an effort to control the effects of changes in the general level of interest rates on
net interest income. Except for its effect on the general level of interest rates, inflation does not have a material impact on the balance
sheet due to the rate variability and short-term maturities of its earning assets. In particular, approximately 62.7% of earning assets
mature or reprice within one year or less. Mortgage loans, generally our loan with the longest maturity, are usually made with five to
fifteen year maturities, but with either a variable interest rate or a fixed rate with an adjustment between origination date and maturity
date.
48
The following table sets forth the distribution of the repricing of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of
December 31, 2014, the interest rate sensitivity gap (i.e., interest rate sensitive assets minus interest rate sensitive liabilities), the
cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap, the interest rate sensitivity gap ratio (i.e., interest rate sensitive assets divided by interest rate
sensitive liabilities) and the cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio. The table also sets forth the time periods in which earning
assets and liabilities will mature or may reprice in accordance with their contractual terms. However, the table does not necessarily
indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on the net interest margin since the repricing of various categories of assets and
liabilities is subject to competitive pressures and the needs of our customers. In addition, various assets and liabilities indicated as
repricing within the same period may in fact reprice at different times within such period and at different rates.
Zero to
Three
Months
At December 31, 2014
Maturing or Repricing Within
One to
Five
Years
(Dollars in Thousands)
Over
Five
Years
Three
Months to
One Year
Total
Interest-earning assets:
Short-term assets
Investment securities
Mortgage loans held for sale
Loans
Purchased, non-covered loans
Covered loans
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits
Savings
Time deposits
Short-term borrowings
Trust preferred securities
$
92,323
366
94,759
691,861
235,857
107,805
1,222,971
$
-
5,391
-
751,059
152,461
102,179
1,011,090
$
-
46,605
-
136,199
31,946
42,496
257,246
- $
$
489,443
-
310,762
253,975
18,799
1,072,979
92,323
541,805
94,759
1,889,881
674,239
271,279
3,564,286
1,653,437
158,046
217,580
108,310
-
2,137,373
-
-
423,364
-
-
423,364
-
-
138,665
43,881
-
182,546
-
-
680
-
65,325
66,005
1,653,437
158,046
780,289
152,191
65,325
2,809,288
Interest rate sensitivity gap
$ (914,402) $ 587,726
$ 74,700
$1,006,974 $ 754,998
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap
$ (914,402) $
(326,676) $ (251,976)
$ 754,998
Interest rate sensitivity gap ratio
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio
0.57
0.57
2.39
0.87
1.41
0.91
16.26
1.27
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
Following is a summary of the carrying value of investment securities available for sale as of the end of each reported period:
2014
$ 14,678
141,375
11,040
-
374,712
$ 541,805
December 31,
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 13,926
112,754
10,325
1,480
347,750
$ 486,235
2012
$ 6,870
114,390
10,328
-
215,321
$ 346,909
U.S. Government sponsored agencies
State, county and municipal securities
Corporate debt securities
Collateralized debt obligations
Mortgage-backed securities
49
The amounts of securities available for sale in each category as of December 31, 2014 are shown in the following table according to
contractual maturity classifications: (i) one year or less, (ii) after one year through five years, (iii) after five years through ten years and
(iv) after ten years.
One year or less
After one year through five
years
After five years through ten
years
After ten years
U.S. Government
Sponsored Agencies
Amount
Yield(1)
State, County and
Municipal
Corporate debt
Mortgage-backed
Amount
Yield(1)(2)
Amount
(Dollars in Thousands)
2.75%
$ 1,266
Yield(1)
Amount
Yield (1)
4.36%
$
-
-%
$
-
-%
$ 4,491
4,890
1.50
39,275
2.84
2,174
6.52
756
2.44
9,788
-
$ 14,678
2.02
-
1.85%
54,413
43,196
$141,375
2.86
3.11
2.14%
-
7,600
$ 11,040
-
6.48
6.26%
34,613
339,343
$ 374,712
2.52
2.59
2.58%
(1) Yields were computed using coupon interest, adding discount accretion or subtracting premium amortization, as appropriate, on a ratable basis
over the life of each security. The weighted average yield for each maturity range was computed using the acquisition price of each security in
that range.
(2) Yields on securities of state and political subdivisions are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis, using a tax rate of 35%.
The investment portfolio consists of securities which are classified as available for sale and recorded at fair value with unrealized gains
and losses excluded from earnings and reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of the related deferred tax effect.
The amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recognized in interest income using methods approximating the interest
method over the life of the securities. Realized gains and losses, determined on the basis of the cost of specific securities sold, are
included in earnings on the trade date. Declines in the fair value of securities below their cost that are deemed to be other-than-temporary
are reflected in earnings as realized losses.
The Company’s methodology for determining whether other-than-temporary impairment losses exist include management considering
(i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects
of the issuer and (iii) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow
for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic
or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Substantially all of the unrealized losses on debt securities are related to changes in interest
rates and do not affect the expected cash flows of the issuer or underlying collateral. All unrealized losses are considered temporary
because each security carries an acceptable investment grade, the Company has the intent and ability to hold such securities until maturity
and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these securities prior to recovery or maturity. The Company’s
investments in subordinated debt include investments in regional and super-regional banks on which the Company conducts regular
analysis through review of financial information or credit ratings. Investments in preferred securities are also concentrated in the
preferred obligations of regional and super-regional banks through non-pooled investment structures. The Company did not hold any
investments in “pooled” trust preferred securities at December 31, 2014.
DEPOSITS
Average amount of various deposit classes and the average rates paid thereon are presented below:
Year Ended December 31,
2014
Amount
Rate
(Dollars in Thousands)
Amount
2013
Rate
Noninterest-bearing demand
NOW
Money Market
Savings
Time
Total deposits
$ 751,874
724,461
805,601
150,266
768,420
$ 3,200,622
0.00%
0.18
0.37
0.11
0.66
0.30%
$ 489,613
597,490
625,085
104,630
671,083
$ 2,487,901
0.00%
0.18
0.37
0.11
0.73
0.34%
50
We have a large, stable base of time deposits with little or no dependence on what we consider volatile deposits. Volatile deposits, in
management’s opinion, are those deposit accounts that are overly rate sensitive and apt to move if our rate offerings are not at or near
the top of the market. Generally speaking, these are brokered deposits or time deposits in amount greater than $100,000.
The amounts of time certificates of deposit issued in amounts of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2014, are shown below by
category, which is based on time remaining until maturity of (i) three months or less, (ii) over three through twelve months and
(iii) greater than one year.
Three months or less
Three months to one year
One year or greater
Total
(Dollars in
Thousands)
$ 83,774
233,340
81,256
$ 398,370
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
In the ordinary course of business, our Bank has granted commitments to extend credit to approved customers. Generally, these
commitments to extend credit have been granted on a temporary basis for seasonal or inventory requirements and have been approved
within the Bank’s credit guidelines. Our Bank has also granted commitments to approved customers for financial standby letters of
credit. These commitments are recorded in the financial statements when funds are disbursed or the financial instruments become
payable. The Bank uses the same credit policies for these off-balance sheet commitments as it does for financial instruments that are
recorded in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and
may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitment amounts expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts
do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
The following is a summary of the commitments outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Commitments to extend credit
Unused lines of credit
Financial standby letters of credit
Mortgage interest rate lock commitments
The following table summarizes short-term borrowings for the periods indicated:
December 31,
2013
2014
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 293,517
49,567
9,683
1,757
$ 354,524
$ 215,995
41,200
7,665
1,082
$ 265,942
2014
Average
Balance
Average
Rate
Years Ended December 31,
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
Average
Average
Rate
Balance
2012
Average
Balance
Average
Rate
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under
agreement to repurchase
$ 47,136
0.35% $ 26,908
0.54%
$ 26,563
0.58%
Total maximum short-term borrowings outstanding at
any month-end during the year
$ 73,310
$ 83,516
$ 50,120
Total
Balance
Total
Balance
Total
Balance
In addition, the Company had a cash flow hedge that matures September 15, 2020 with a notional amount of $37.1 million at December
31, 2014 and 2013, for the purpose of converting the variable rate on the junior subordinated debentures to a fixed rate of 4.11%. The
interest rate swap, which is classified as a cash flow hedge, is indexed to LIBOR.
51
The following table sets forth certain information about contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2014.
Total
Payments Due After December 31, 2014
1 Year
4-5
Years
Or Less
1-3
Years
(Dollars in Thousands)
5
Years
Time certificates of deposit
Subordinated debentures
Total contractual cash obligations
$ 780,289 $ 641,101 $ 131,569 $ 7,019 $
600
65,325
$ 845,614 $ 641,101 $ 131,569 $ 7,019 $ 65,925
65,325
-
-
-
Our operating leases represent short-term obligations, normally with maturities of less than three years. Many of the operating leases
have thirty-day cancellation provisions. The total contractual obligations for operating leases do not require a material amount of our
cash funds.
At December 31, 2014, we had immaterial amounts of binding commitments for capital expenditures.
CAPITAL ADEQUACY
Capital Purchase Program
On November 21, 2008, the Company elected to participate in the CPP established by the EESA. Accordingly, on such date, the
Company issued and sold to the Treasury, for an aggregate cash purchase price of $52 million, (i) 52,000 Preferred Shares having a
liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and (ii) a ten-year Warrant to purchase up to 679,443 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise
price of $11.48 per share. The issuance and sale of these securities was a private placement exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. On June 14, 2012, the Preferred Shares were sold by the Treasury through a registered public offering.
On August 22, 2012, the Company repurchased the Warrant from the Treasury for $2.67 million, and in December 2012, the Company
repurchased 24,000 of the outstanding Preferred Shares. In March 2014, the Company redeemed the remaining 28,000 outstanding
Preferred Shares.
Capital Regulations
The capital resources of the Company are monitored on a periodic basis by state and federal regulatory authorities. During 2014, the
Company’s capital increased $49.3 million, primarily due to the issuance of Common Stock of $34.5 million related to the Coastal
acquisition, net income available to common shareholders of $38.7 million and other comprehensive income of $6.4 million, partially
offset by the redemption of preferred stock of $28.0 million. Other capital related transactions, such as Common Stock issuances through
the exercise of stock options and restricted stock account for only a small change in the capital of the Company. During 2013, the
Company’s capital increased $37.7 million, primarily due to the issuance of Common Stock of $24.6 million related to the Prosperity
acquisition and net income available to common shareholders of $18.3 million, partially offset by other comprehensive losses of $6.9
million.
In accordance with risk capital guidelines issued by the Federal Reserve, we are required to maintain a minimum standard of total capital
to risk-weighted assets of 8%. Additionally, all member banks must maintain “core” or “Tier 1” capital of at least 4% of total assets
(“leverage ratio”). Member banks operating at or near the 4% capital level are expected to have well-diversified risks, including no
undue interest rate risk exposure, excellent control systems, good earnings, high asset quality and well managed on- and off-balance
sheet activities, and, in general, be considered strong banking organizations with a composite 1 rating under the CAMEL rating system
of banks. For all but the most highly rated banks meeting the above conditions, the minimum leverage ratio is to be 4% plus an additional
1% to 2%.
52
The following table summarizes the regulatory capital levels of Ameris at December 31, 2014:
Leverage capital
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
Risk-based capital:
Core capital
Actual
Amount
Percent
Required
Amount
Percent
(Dollars in Thousands)
Excess
Amount
Percent
$ 352,153
393,199 10.01
8.94% $ 157,574
157,165
4.00%
4.00
$ 194,579
236,034
4.94%
6.01
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
Total capital
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
352,153 12.66
393,199 14.14
111,279
111,264
373,310 13.42
414,356 14.90
222,557
222,528
4.00
4.00
8.00
8.00
240,874
281,935
8.66
10.14
150,753
191,828
5.42
6.90
INFLATION
The consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with
GAAP and practices within the banking industry which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of
historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most
industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates
have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than the effects of general levels of inflation.
53
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following table sets forth certain consolidated quarterly financial information of the Company. This information is derived from
unaudited consolidated financial statements, which include, in the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments which
management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the results for such periods.
Selected Income Statement Data:
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Acquisition related expenses
Income before income taxes
Income tax
Net income
Preferred stock dividends
Net income available to common stockholders
Per Share Data:
Net income – basic
Net income – diluted
Common Dividends (Cash)
Common Dividends (Stock)
Selected Income Statement Data:
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
4
$ 44,900
3,894
41,006
888
40,118
16,362
41,666
67
14,747
4,167
10,580
-
$ 10,580
0.40
0.39
0.05
-
4
Quarters Ended December 31, 2014
3
2
1
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
$ 43,186
4,054
39,132
1,669
37,463
17,901
38,028
551
16,785
5,122
11,663
-
$ 11,663
0.44
0.43
0.05
-
$ 38,607
3,343
35,264
1,365
$ 37,873
3,389
34,484
1,726
33,899
15,819
34,446
2,872
12,400
4,270
8,130
-
8,130
0.32
0.32
0.05
-
$
$
32,758
12,754
32,789
450
12,273
3,923
8,350
286
8,064
0.32
0.32
-
-
1
Quarters Ended December 31, 2013
3
2
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
$ 31,749
2,698
29,051
1,478
$ 31,749
2,429
29,320
2,920
$ 31,951
2,475
29,476
4,165
$ 30,873
2,535
28,338
2,923
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Acquisition related expenses
Income before income taxes
Income tax
Net income
Preferred stock dividends
Net income available to common stockholders
$
Per Share Data:
Net income – basic
Net income – diluted
Common Dividends (Cash)
Common Dividends (Stock)
26,400
12,288
28,237
512
9,939
3,262
6,677
443
6,234
0.26
0.26
-
-
$
25,311
11,384
26,688
-
10,007
3,329
6,678
442
6,236
0.26
0.26
-
-
$
25,415
11,360
28,884
-
7,891
2,606
5,285
441
4,844
0.20
0.20
-
-
$
27,573
11,517
33,274
4,350
1,466
88
1,378
412
966
0.04
0.04
-
-
54
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed only to U.S. Dollar interest rate changes and, accordingly, we manage exposure by considering the possible changes in
the net interest margin. We do not have any trading instruments nor do we classify any portion of the investment portfolio as
trading. Finally, we have no exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk or other market risks.
Interest rates play a major part in the net interest income of a financial institution. The sensitivity to rate changes is known as “interest
rate risk.” The repricing of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities can influence the changes in net interest income. As
part of our asset/liability management program, the timing of repriced assets and liabilities is referred to as gap management. Our policy
is to maintain a gap ratio in the one-year time horizon of .80 to 1.20. As indicated by the gap analysis included in this Annual Report,
we are somewhat liability sensitive in relation to changes in market interest rates. Being liability sensitive would result in net interest
income decreasing in a rising rate environment and increasing in a declining rate environment.
We use simulation analysis to monitor changes in net interest income due to changes in market interest rates. The simulation of rising,
declining and flat interest rate scenarios allow management to monitor and adjust interest rate sensitivity to minimize the impact of
market interest rate swings. The analysis of the impact on net interest income over a twelve-month period is subjected to a gradual 200
basis points increase or 200 basis points decrease in market rates on net interest income and is monitored on a quarterly basis. Our most
recent model projects net interest income would decrease slightly if rates rise 200 basis points gradually over the next year. A scenario
involving a 200 basis points decrease is irrelevant at this time with current market rates being at or near zero since the last reduction of
the federal funds target rate by the Federal Reserve on December 16, 2008.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Income – Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income/(Loss) – Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity – Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
(as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by
this Annual Report, as required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on such evaluation, such officers
have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are
effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is set forth on page F-3 of this Annual Report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified
in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 of the Exchange Act that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
55
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information set forth under the captions “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors,” “Board and Committee Matters,” “Executive Officers”
and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the solicitation
of proxies for the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC, is incorporated herein by reference.
Code of Ethics
Ameris has adopted a code of ethics that is applicable to all employees, including its Chief Executive Officer and all senior financial
officers, including its Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting officer. Ameris shall provide to any person without charge, upon
request, a copy of its code of ethics. Such requests should be directed to the Corporate Secretary of Ameris Bancorp at 310 First St., SE,
Moultrie, Georgia 31768.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information set forth under the caption “Executive Compensation” in the Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the
solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC, is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information set forth under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy Statement
to be used in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the
SEC, is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to securities to be issued under our equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2014.
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders (1)
Number of
securities to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under equity
compensation plans
447,442
$
16.99
1,191,000
(1) Consists of (i) our 2014 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, which provides for the granting to directors, officers and certain
other employees of qualified or nonqualified stock options, stock units, stock awards, stock appreciation rights, dividend
equivalents and other stock-based awards; and (ii) the 2005 Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long-Term Incentive Plan and the
ABC Bancorp Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long-Term incentive Plan that was adopted in 1997, which are now operative only
with respect to the exercise of options that remain outstanding under such plan and under which no further awards may be granted.
All securities remaining for future issuance represent awards that may be granted under the 2014 Omnibus Equity Compensation
Plan.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information set forth under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors”
in the Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
to be filed with the SEC, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information set forth under the caption “Proposal 2 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor” in the Proxy Statement
to be used in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the
SEC, is incorporated herein by reference.
56
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
1.
Financial statements:
(a) Ameris Bancorp and Subsidiaries:
PART IV
(i) Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2014 and 2013;
(ii) Consolidated Statements of Income – Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012;
(iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income/(Loss) – Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012;
(iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity – Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012;
(v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012; and
(vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(b) Ameris Bancorp (parent company only):
Parent company only financial information has been included in Note 26 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
2.
3.
Financial statement schedules:
All schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the financial statements or
related notes.
A list of the Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K to be filed as a part of this Annual Report is shown on the “Exhibit
Index” filed herewith.
57
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Date: March 16, 2015
AMERIS BANCORP
By: /s/ Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.
Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Edwin
W. Hortman, Jr. as his attorney-in-fact, acting with full power of substitution for him in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any amendments to this Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto, and any other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorney-in-fact, or
his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this Form 10-K has been signed by the following persons in the capacities
and on the dates indicated.
Date: March 16, 2015
/s/ Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.
Edwin W. Hortman, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer)
Date: March 16, 2015
/s/ Dennis J. Zember Jr.
Dennis J. Zember Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal accounting and financial officer)
Date: March 16, 2015
/s/ William I. Bowen, Jr.
William I. Bowen, Jr., Director
Date: March 16, 2015
/s/ R. Dale Ezzell
R. Dale Ezzell, Director
Date: March 16, 2015
/s/ J. Raymond Fulp
J. Raymond Fulp, Director
Date: March 16, 2015
/s/ Leo J. Hill
Leo J. Hill, Director
Date: March 16, 2015
/s/ Daniel B. Jeter
Daniel B. Jeter, Director and Chairman of the Board
Date: March 16, 2015
/s/ Robert P. Lynch
Robert P. Lynch, Director
Date: March 16, 2015
/s/ Brooks Sheldon
Brooks Sheldon, Director
Date: March 16, 2015
/s/ William H. Stern
William H. Stern, Director
Date: March 16, 2015
/s/ Jimmy D. Veal
Jimmy D. Veal, Director
58
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
Description
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Regulation A Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed with the SEC on August 14, 1987).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 26, 1999).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2003).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 1, 2005).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 21, 2008).
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 1, 2011).
Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2005).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company dated September 20, 2006 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-138252) filed
with the SEC on October 27, 2006).
Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture dated September 20, 2006 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-138252) filed with the
SEC on October 27, 2006).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and U.S. Bank National
Association dated as of March 26, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity Banking
Company and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2033 (included as Exhibit A to the
Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14,
2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas dated as of June 24, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity Banking
Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Note Due 2034 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.8 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of January 31, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity Banking
Company and Wilmington Trust Company (pertaining to Indenture dated as of January 31, 2006) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.10 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2036 (included as Exhibit A to the
Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.9 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14,
2014).
59
Exhibit No.
4.12
Description
Indenture between Ameris Bank (as successor to Prosperity Bank) and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of May
11, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on March 14, 2014).
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
4.20
4.21
4.22
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
10.1*
10.2*
10.3*
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bank, Prosperity Bank and
Wilmington Trust Company (pertaining to Indenture dated as of May 11, 2006) (pertaining to Indenture dated as of
May 11, 2006) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with
the SEC on March 14, 2014)..
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debenture Due 2016 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as
Exhibit 4.12 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of June 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity Banking
Company and Wilmington Trust Company (pertaining to Indenture dated as of June 30, 2006) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.16 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Form of Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debenture Due 2016 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as
Exhibit 4.15 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to The Prosperity Banking Company) and Wilmington Trust
Company dated as of September 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 23, 2013 by and among Ameris Bancorp, The Prosperity Banking
Company and Wilmington Trust Company (pertaining to Indenture dated as of September 20, 2007) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.19 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2014).
Form of Fixed/Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture Due 2037 (included as Exhibit A to
the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.18 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14,
2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Coastal Bankshares, Inc.) and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association dated as of August 27, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 30, 2014 by and among Ameris Bancorp and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association (pertaining to Indenture dated as of August 27, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
Form of Junior Subordinated Debt Security Due 2033 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
Indenture between Ameris Bancorp (as successor to Coastal Bankshares, Inc.) and U.S. Bank National Association
dated as of December 14, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 30, 2014 by and among Ameris Bancorp, Coastal Bankshares, Inc. and
U.S. Bank National Association (pertaining to Indenture dated as of December 14, 2005) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.5 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
Form of Junior Subordinated Debt Security Due 2035 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.4 to
Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2014).
Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Ameris
Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 25, 1998).
ABC Bancorp 2000 Officer/Director Stock Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 29, 2000).
2005 Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Ameris
Bancorp’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 18, 2005).
60
10.4*
10.5*
10.6*
10.7*
10.8*
10.9*
10.10*
10.11*
10.12*
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16*
10.17
10.18
10.19*
10.20*
10.21*
10.22*
10.23*
10.24*
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on January 24, 2006).
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on January 24, 2006).
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on January 24, 2006).
Executive Employment Agreement with H. Richard Sturm dated as of May 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 6, 2007).
First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement dated December 30, 2008, by and between Ameris Bancorp and
H. Richard Sturm (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on December 30, 2008).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Edwin W. Hortman, Jr., dated as of November 7, 2012
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2012).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Dennis J. Zember Jr., dated as of November 7, 2012 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2012).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Jon S. Edwards, dated as of November 7, 2012 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2012).
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Cindi H. Lewis, dated as of November 7, 2012 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2012).
Loan Agreement dated as of August 28, 2013 by and between Ameris Bancorp and NexBank SSB (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 29, 2013).
Revolving Promissory Note dated as of August 28, 2013 issued by Ameris Bancorp to NexBank SSB (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 29, 2013).
Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of August 28, 2013 by and between Ameris Bancorp and NexBank SSB
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
August 29, 2013).
Executive Employment Agreement by and between Ameris Bancorp and James A. LaHaise dated as of June 30, 2014
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 8, 2014).
First Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of September 26, 2014 by and between Ameris Bancorp and NexBank
SSB (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
September 29, 2014).
Amended and Restated Revolving Promissory Note dated as of September 26, 2014 issued by Ameris Bancorp to
NexBank SSB (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on September 29, 2014).
Ameris Bancorp 2014 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Ameris
Bancorp’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 17, 2014).
Form of Incentive Stock Option Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014).
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014).
Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on November 26, 2014).
Executive Employment Agreement by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and Edwin W. Hortman, Jr. dated as
of December 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on December 18, 2014).
Executive Employment Agreement by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and Dennis J. Zember Jr. dated as of
December 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on December 18, 2014).
61
10.25*
10.26*
10.27*
10.28*
21.1
23.1
23.2
24.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101
Executive Employment Agreement by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and Andrew B. Cheney dated as of
December 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on December 18, 2014).
Executive Employment Agreement by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and Jon S. Edwards dated as of
December 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on December 18, 2014).
Executive Employment Agreement by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and Stephen A. Melton dated as of
December 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on December 18, 2014).
Executive Employment Agreement by and among Ameris Bancorp, Ameris Bank and Cindi H. Lewis dated as of
December 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on December 18, 2014).
Schedule of Subsidiaries of Ameris Bancorp.
Consent of Crowe Horwath LLP.
Consent of Porter Keadle Moore, LLC.
Power of Attorney relating to this Form 10-K is set forth on the signature pages of this Form 10-K.
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Executive Officer.
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by Chief Financial Officer.
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Executive Officer.
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer.
The following financial statements from Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014,
formatted as interactive data files in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language):
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
Consolidated Balance Sheets;
Consolidated Statements of Income;
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income/(Loss);
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity;
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
* Management contract or a compensatory plan or arrangement.
62
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 31, 2014 and 2013
Consolidated Statements of Income – Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income/(Loss) – Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity – Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
F-2
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-7
F-8
F-9
F-11
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ameris Bancorp
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Ameris Bancorp (the “Company) as of December 31, 2014, and the related
statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2014.
We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in
the 2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements and an opinion on the company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit
of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As permitted, the Company has excluded the operations of Coastal Bankshares, Inc. acquired during 2014, which is described in Note
2 of the consolidated financial statements, from the scope of management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. As
such, it has also been excluded from the scope of our audit of internal control over financial reporting.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company
as of December 31, 2014, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2014 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in the 2013
Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).
Atlanta, GA
March 16, 2015
Crowe Horwath LLP
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
FIRM
FIRM
FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ameris Bancorp
Ameris Bancorp
Ameris Bancorp
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ameris Bancorp and subsidiaries, (the “Company”) as of
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ameris Bancorp and subsidiaries, (the “Company”) as of
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ameris Bancorp and subsidiaries, (the “Company”) as of
December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders'
December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders'
December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
statements based on our audits.
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Ameris Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each
Ameris Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each
Ameris Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each
of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
United States of America.
United States of America.
Atlanta, Georgia
Atlanta, Georgia
Atlanta, Georgia
March 14, 2014
March 14, 2014
March 14, 2014
235 Peachtree Street NE | Suite 1800 | Atlanta, Georgia 30303 | Phone 404.588.4200 | Fax 404.588.4222
235 Peachtree Street NE | Suite 1800 | Atlanta, Georgia 30303 | Phone 404.588.4200 | Fax 404.588.4222
235 Peachtree Street NE | Suite 1800 | Atlanta, Georgia 30303 | Phone 404.588.4200 | Fax 404.588.4222
F-3
F-3
F-3
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of Ameris Bancorp (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over
financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As permitted, the Company has excluded the operations of Coastal Bankshares, Inc. acquired during 2014, which is described in Note
2 to the consolidated financial statements. The assets acquired in this acquisition and excluded from management's assessment on
internal control over financial reporting comprised approximately 10.44% of total consolidated assets at December 31, 2014.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In
making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (2013 framework) (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment and those criteria,
management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.
Crowe Horwath LLP, the Company’s independent auditors, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. That report is included in this Annual Report on page F-2.
/s/ Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.
Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.
President and
Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Dennis J. Zember, Jr.
Dennis J. Zember, Jr.
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
F-4
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
Federal funds sold
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value
Other investments
Mortgage loans held for sale, at fair value
Loans, net of unearned income
Purchased loans not covered by FDIC loss share agreements (“purchased non-covered loans”)
Purchased loans covered by FDIC loss share agreements (“covered loans”)
Less: allowance for loan losses
Loans, net
Other real estate owned, net
Purchased, non-covered other real estate owned, net
Covered other real estate owned, net
Total other real estate owned, net
Premises and equipment, net
FDIC loss-share receivable
Other intangible assets, net
Goodwill
Cash value of bank owned life insurance
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing
Interest-bearing
Total deposits
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Other borrowings
Subordinated deferrable interest debentures
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, stated value $1,000; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 0 and 28,000 shares
issued and outstanding
Common stock, par value $1; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 28,159,027 and
26,461,769 shares issued
Capital surplus
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,385,164 and 1,363,342 shares
Total stockholders’ equity
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
$
2014
78,036
86,823
5,500
541,805
10,275
94,759
$
2013
62,955
190,064
14,920
486,235
16,828
67,278
1,889,881
674,239
271,279
(21,157)
2,814,242
1,618,454
448,753
390,237
(22,377)
2,435,067
33,160
15,585
19,907
68,652
33,351
4,276
45,893
83,520
97,251
31,351
8,221
63,547
58,867
77,748
$ 4,037,077
103,188
65,441
6,009
35,049
49,432
51,663
$ 3,667,649
$ 839,377
2,591,772
3,431,149
73,310
78,881
65,325
22,384
3,671,049
$ 668,531
2,330,700
2,999,231
83,516
194,572
55,466
18,165
3,350,950
-
28,000
28,159
225,015
118,412
6,098
(11,656)
366,028
$ 4,037,077
26,462
189,722
83,991
(294)
(11,182)
316,699
$ 3,667,649
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014, 2013 AND 2012
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)
2014
2013
2012
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans
Interest on taxable securities
Interest on nontaxable securities
Interest on deposits in other banks
Interest on federal funds sold
Total interest income
Interest expense
Interest on deposits
Interest on other borrowings
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Other income
Service charges on deposit accounts
Mortgage banking activity
Other service charges, commissions and fees
Net gains on sales of securities
Gain on acquisitions
Gain on sale of SBA loans
Other noninterest income
Total noninterest income
Other expenses
Salaries and employee benefits
Occupancy and equipment
Advertising and marketing
Amortization of intangible assets
Data processing and communications expenses
Credit resolution related expenses
Merger and conversion charges
Other noninterest expenses
Total noninterest expense
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Preferred stock dividends
Net income available to common stockholders
Basic earnings per common share
Diluted earnings per common share
Dividends declared per common share
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic
Diluted
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
$ 150,611
12,086
1,626
236
7
164,566
9,488
5,192
14,680
149,886
5,648
144,238
24,614
25,986
2,647
138
-
3,896
5,555
62,836
73,878
17,521
2,869
2,330
15,551
13,506
3,940
21,274
150,869
56,205
(17,482)
$ 117,497
7,134
1,413
276
2
126,322
8,400
1,737
10,137
116,185
11,486
104,699
19,545
19,128
2,151
171
-
1,500
4,054
46,549
56,670
12,286
1,620
1,414
11,539
15,486
4,350
18,580
121,945
29,303
(9,285)
$ 119,310
8,250
1,475
434
10
129,479
13,327
1,747
15,074
114,405
31,089
83,316
19,576
12,989
1,431
322
20,037
264
3,255
57,874
53,122
13,208
1,622
1,359
10,683
22,416
2,125
14,935
119,470
21,720
(7,285)
38,723
20,018
14,435
286
1,738
3,577
$ 38,437
$ 18,280
$ 10,858
$
$
$
1.48
1.46
0.15
$
$
$
0.76
0.75
-
$
$
$
0.46
0.46
-
25,974
26,259
23,918
24,348
23,802
23,843
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014, 2013 AND 2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
Net income
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Net unrealized holding gain/(loss) arising during period on investment securities
available for sale, net of tax (benefit) of $3,969, ($4,421) and $215
Reclassification adjustment for gains on investment securities included in operations, net
of tax of $48, $60 and $113
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges during the period, net of tax (benefit)
of ($479), $765 and ($474)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income
2013
2013
2012
$38,723 $ 20,018
$ 14,435
7,371
(8,210)
(90)
(111)
(889)
6,392
1,420
(6,901)
399
(209)
(879)
(689)
$45,115 $ 13,117
$ 13,746
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-7
AMERIS BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollars in Thousands, except share data)
PREFERRED STOCK
Balance at beginning of period
Repurchase of preferred stock
Accretion of fair value of warrant
Balance at end of period
COMMON STOCK
Balance at beginning of period
Issuance of common stock in acquisition
Issuance of restricted shares
Cancellation of restricted shares
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Balance at end of period
CAPITAL SURPLUS
Balance at beginning of period
Issuance of common stock in acquisition
Repurchase of warrant
Stock-based compensation
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Issuance of restricted shares
Cancellation of restricted shares
Balance at end of period
RETAINED EARNINGS
Balance at beginning of period
Net income
Dividends on preferred shares
Dividends on common shares
Accretion of fair value warrant
-
-
26,461,769
1,598,998
77,047
(10,571)
31,784
$
$
2014
Year Ended December 31,
2013
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Shares
2012
Amount
28,000
(28,000)
$
28,000
(28,000 )
28,000
-
$
27,662
-
-
338
-
-
28,000
$
28,000
28,000
$
27,662
52,000
(24,000)
-
$
50,727
(24,000 )
935
26,462
1,599
77
(11 )
32
25,154,818
1,168,918
108,400
(4,000)
33,633
$
25,155
1,169
108
(4 )
34
25,087,468
-
67,450
(500)
400
$
25,087
-
67
-
1
28,159,027
$
28,159
26,461,769
$
26,462
25,154,818
$
25,155
$ 189,722
32,875
-
2,057
427
(77 )
11
$ 225,015
$
83,991
38,723
(286 )
(4,016 )
-
$ 164,949
23,460
-
1,041
376
(108 )
4
$ 189,722
$
65,710
20,018
(1,399 )
-
(338 )
$ 166,639
-
(2,670 )
1,044
2
(67 )
1
$ 164,949
$
54,852
14,435
(2,642 )
-
(935 )
Balance at end of period
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(LOSS), NET OF TAX
Unrealized gains on securities:
Balance at beginning of period
Change during period
Balance at end of period
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap:
Balance at beginning of period
Change during period
Balance at end of period
Balance at end of period
TREASURY STOCK
Balance at beginning of period
Purchase of treasury shares
1,363,342
21,822
$ 118,412
$
83,991
$
65,710
$
$
$
$
$
$
(1,691 )
7,281
5,590
1,397
(889 )
508
6,098
(11,182 )
(474)
1,355,050
8,292
$
$
$
$
$
$
6,630
(8,321 )
(1,691 )
(23 )
1,420
1,397
(294 )
(11,066 )
(116)
1,336,174
18,876
$
$
$
$
$
$
6,440
190
6,630
856
(879 )
(23 )
6,607
(10,831 )
(235)
Balance at end of period
1,385,164
$
(11,656 )
1,363,342
$
(11,182 )
1,355,050
$
(11,066 )
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
$ 366,028
$ 316,699
$ 279,017
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-8
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014, 2013 AND 2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
2014
2013
2012
$ 38,723
$ 20,018
$ 14,435
Depreciation
Amortization of intangible assets
Net amortization of investment securities available for sale
Net gains on securities available for sale
Stock based compensation expense
Net (gains) losses on sale or disposal of premises and equipment
Net write-downs and losses on sale of other real estate owned
Gain on acquisitions
Provision for loan losses
Accretion of discount on covered loans
Accretion of discount on purchased non-covered loans
Changes in FDIC loss-share receivable, net of cash payments received
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI
Provision for deferred taxes
(Increase)/decrease in interest receivable
Increase/(decrease) in interest payable
Increase/(decrease) in taxes payable
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale
Originations of SBA loans
Proceeds from sales of SBA loans
Net gains on sale of SBA loans
Decrease in prepaid FDIC assessments
Change attributable to other operating activities
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
INVESTING ACTIVITIES, net of effects of business combinations
Net decrease in federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in banks
Purchases of securities available for sale
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale
(Increase)/decrease in restricted equity securities, net
Net increase in loans, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans
Payments received on purchased non-covered loans
Payments received on covered loans
Purchase of premises and equipment
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned
Payments received from FDIC under loss share agreements
Net cash proceeds received from acquisitions
Net cash provided by investing activities
FINANCING ACTIVITIES, net of effects of business combinations
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Repayment of other borrowings
Proceeds from other borrowings
Repurchase of warrant
Dividends paid - preferred stock
Dividends paid - common stock
Redemption of preferred stock
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Purchase of treasury shares
Net cash used in financing activities
F-9
6,642
2,330
3,666
(138)
2,057
(516)
4,950
-
5,648
(22,188)
(9,745)
11,596
(1,623)
6,516
(1,952)
(49)
(7,221)
(687,090)
666,897
(58,089)
32,782
(3,896)
-
5,104
(5,596)
128,584
(126,909)
51,215
94,051
8,028
(251,955)
74,931
102,996
(5,709)
1,213
-
43,793
22,494
1,099
143,831
62,894
(15,634)
(257,060)
118,963
-
(286)
(4,016)
(28,000)
459
(474)
(123,154)
4,938
1,414
3,191
(171)
1,041
(55)
9,162
-
11,486
(42,208)
-
25,461
(1,223)
3,543
(1,395)
199
(1,420)
(525,376)
506,884
(12,486)
15,754
(1,500)
2,843
1,749
21,849
10,380
(90,033)
50,490
36,669
(1,269)
(183,731)
943
120,155
(5,634)
2,114
(30,000)
68,917
68,822
4,123
51,946
(99,115)
11,866
(177,741)
175,000
-
(1,400)
-
-
410
(116)
(91,096)
5,032
1,359
4,410
(322)
1,044
581
8,951
(20,037)
31,089
(45,752)
-
6,594
(163)
2,525
1,102
(1,708)
(5,941)
(61,120)
23,897
(5,319)
264
(264)
1,314
30,201
(7,828)
35,365
(146,847)
146,789
29,240
4,135
(190,848)
-
194,552
(9,065)
593
(15,506)
56,962
128,730
220,516
454,616
(384,638)
12,456
(30,334)
-
(2,670)
(2,642)
-
(24,000)
3
(235)
(432,060)
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014, 2013 AND 2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period
Cash and due from banks at end of period
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest
Income taxes
2014
2013
2012
15,081
62,955
(17,301)
80,256
14,728
65,528
$ 78,036
$ 62,955
$ 80,256
$ 14,667
$
9,938
$ 16,782
$ 19,281
$ 16,925
$
2,563
Loans (excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans) transferred to
other real estate owned
$ 11,972
$
9,137
$ 19,265
Purchased non-covered loans transferred to other real estate owned
$
4,160
$
-
$
-
Covered loans transferred to other real estate owned
$ 13,650
$ 31,833
$ 43,298
Loans provided for the sales of other real estate owned
$
1,109
$
2,416
$
5,991
Assets acquired in business combinations
$ 448,971
$ 745,027
$ 450,056
Liabilities assumed in business combinations
$ 411,701
$ 720,236
$ 430,019
Issuance of common stock in acquisitions
$ 34,474
$ 24,629
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale
$
7,281
$
(8,321)
Change in unrealized gain on cash flow hedge (interest rate swap)
$
(889)
$
1,420
$
$
$
-
190
(879)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-10
AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Business
Ameris Bancorp (the “Company”) is a financial holding company whose primary business is presently conducted by Ameris Bank, its
wholly owned banking subsidiary (the “Bank”). Through the Bank, the Company operates a full service banking business and offers a
broad range of retail and commercial banking services to its customers concentrated in select markets in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and
South Carolina. The Company also engages in mortgage banking activities and SBA lending, and, as such, acquires, sells and services
one-to-four family residential mortgage loans and SBA loans in the Southeast. The Company and the Bank are subject to the regulations
of certain federal and state agencies and are periodically examined by those regulatory agencies.
Basis of Presentation and Accounting Estimates
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. Significant intercompany transactions
and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the
date of the balance sheet and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Acquisition Accounting
Acquisitions are accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Purchased assets and assumed liabilities are recorded at their
estimated fair values as of the purchase date. Any identifiable intangible assets are also recorded at fair value. When the fair value of
the assets purchased exceeds the fair value of liabilities assumed, it results in a “bargain purchase gain.” If the consideration given
exceeds the fair value of the net assets received, goodwill is recognized. Fair values are subject to refinement for up to one year after
the closing date of an acquisition as information relative to closing date fair values becomes available.
All identifiable intangible assets that are acquired in a business combination are recognized at fair value on the acquisition date.
Identifiable intangible assets are recognized separately if they arise from contractual or other legal rights or if they are separable (i.e.,
capable of being sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged separately from the entity). Because deposit liabilities and the related
customer relationship intangible assets may be exchanged in a sale or exchange transaction, the intangible asset associated with the
depositor relationship is considered identifiable.
Purchased loans acquired in a business combination are recorded at estimated fair value on their purchase date and prohibit the carryover
of the related allowance for loan losses. When the loans have evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the
date of acquisition that the Company will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments, the difference between
contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the non-
accretable discount. The Company must estimate expected cash flows at each reporting date. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash
flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses. Subsequent increases in expected cash flows result in a reversal of the provision
for loan losses to the extent of prior provisions and adjust accretable discount if no prior provisions have been made. This increase in
accretable discount will have a positive impact on interest income.
Cash, Due from Banks and Cash Flows
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and due from banks includes cash on hand, cash items in process of collection and amounts
due from banks. The Bank is required to maintain reserve balances in cash or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank. The total of the
average daily required reserve was approximately $20.1 million and $11.6 million for the years ended 2014 and 2013, respectively. Net
cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions, and federal
funds purchased and repurchase agreements.
F-11
Securities
The Company classifies its securities in one of three categories: (i) held to maturity, (ii) available for sale or (iii) trading. Trading
securities are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. Held to maturity securities are those securities
for which the Company has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. All other securities are classified as available for sale. At
December 31, 2014 and 2013, all securities were classified as available for sale.
Held to maturity securities are recorded at cost, adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts. Trading securities
are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. Available for sale securities are recorded at fair value.
Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, on available for sale securities are excluded from net income and are
reported in other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders’ equity until realized. Transfers of securities between
categories are recorded at fair value at the date of transfer. Unrealized holding gains or losses associated with transfers of securities from
held to maturity to available for sale are recorded as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. These unrealized holding gains or
losses are amortized into income over the remaining life of the security as an adjustment to the yield in a manner consistent with the
amortization or accretion of the original purchase premium or discount on the associated security.
The amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recognized in interest income using methods approximating the interest
method over the life of the securities. Realized gains and losses, determined on the basis of the cost of specific securities sold, are
included in earnings on the trade date. A decline in the market value of any available for sale or held to maturity investment below cost
that is deemed other than temporary is charged to earnings and establishes a new cost basis for the security for the decline in value
deemed to be credit related. The decline in value attributed to non-credit related factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.
In determining whether other-than-temporary impairment losses exist, management considers (i) the length of time and the extent to
which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and (iii) the Company’s
intent to sell the security and whether it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell the security prior to its
anticipated recovery or maturity.
Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale
Mortgage loans held-for-sale are carried at the estimated fair value, as determined by outstanding commitments from third party investors
in the secondary market. Adjustments to reflect unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value of mortgage loans held-
for-sale and realized gains and losses upon ultimate sale of the loans are classified as noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements
of Operation.
Servicing Rights
When mortgage and SBA loans are sold with servicing retained, servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value with the income
statement effect recorded in mortgage banking activity and gains on sales of SBA loans. Fair value is based on market prices for
comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value
of estimated future net servicing income. All classes of servicing assets are subsequently measured using the amortization method which
requires servicing rights to be amortized into non-interest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net
servicing income of the underlying loans.
Servicing rights are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to carrying amount. Impairment is
determined by stratifying rights into groupings based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type and investor
type. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual grouping, to the extent that fair value is less than the
carrying amount. If the Company later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular grouping, a
reduction of the allowance may be recorded as an increase to income. Changes in valuation allowances are reported with “Mortgage
banking activity” on the income statement. The fair values of servicing rights are subject to significant fluctuations as a result of changes
in estimated and actual prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.
Servicing fee income, which is reported on the income statement as “Other noninterest income”, is recorded for fees earned for servicing
loans. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal; or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income
when earned. The amortization of servicing rights is netted against loan servicing fee income. Servicing fees totaled $1,011,000,
$611,000 and $453,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Late fees and ancillary fees related to loan
servicing are not material.
F-12
Loans
Loans, excluding loans covered by FDIC loss-share agreements (“covered loans”) and purchased loans not covered by FDIC loss-share
agreements (“purchased non-covered loans”) are reported at their outstanding principal balances less unearned income, net of deferred
fees and origination costs and the allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the outstanding principal balance.
For all classes of loans, the accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to
make payments as they become due, unless the loan is well-secured and in the process of collection. Interest income on mortgage and
commercial loans is discontinued and placed on non-accrual status at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the loan is well-
secured and in process of collection. Mortgage loans and commercial loans are charged off to the extent principal or interest is deemed
uncollectible. Consumer and credit card loans continue to accrue interest until they are charged off, generally between 90 and 120 days
past due, unless the loan is in the process of collection. Non-accrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller
balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans. All interest
accrued, but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual or charged off, is reversed against interest income. Interest income on
nonaccrual loans is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received until the loans are returned to accrual
status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future
payments are reasonably assured.
Purchased Loans
Purchased loans include loans acquired in FDIC-assisted acquisitions (“covered loans”) and other acquisitions (“purchased non-covered
loans”) and are initially recorded at fair value on the date of the purchase. Purchased loans that contain evidence of credit deterioration
(“purchased credit impaired loans”) on the date of purchase are carried at the net present value of expected future proceeds. All other
purchased loans are recorded at their initial fair value, adjusted for subsequent advances, pay downs, amortization or accretion of any
premium or discount on purchase, charge-offs and any other adjustment to carrying value. There is no carryover of the seller’s allowance
for loan losses. After acquisition, losses are recognized by an increase in the allowance for loan losses.
In determining the initial fair value of purchased loans without evidence of credit deterioration at the date of acquisition, management
includes (i) no carryover of any previously recorded ALLL and (ii) an adjustment of the recorded investment to reflect an appropriate
market rate of interest, given the risk profile and grade assigned to each loan. This adjustment is accreted into earnings as a yield
adjustment, using the effective yield method, over the remaining life of each loan.
Purchased credit impaired loans are accounted for individually. The Company estimates the amount and timing of expected cash flows
for each loan, and the expected cash flows in excess of the amount paid is recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan
(accretable yield). The excess of the loan’s contractual principal and interest over expected cash flows is not recorded (nonaccretable
difference).
Over the life of the loan, expected cash flows continue to be estimated. If the present value of expected cash flows is less than the
carrying amount, a loss is recorded as a provision for loan losses. If the present value of expected cash flows is greater than the carrying
amount, it is recognized as part of future interest income.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loan losses are charged against the
allowance when management believes the collection of a loan’s principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries are credited to the
allowance.
The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb estimated losses relating to specifically identified
loans, as well as probable incurred losses in the balance of the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular
basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of various risks in the loan portfolio highlighted by historical
experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, current economic
conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic
conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information
becomes available.
The allowance for loan losses evaluation does not include the effects of expected losses on specific loans or groups of loans that are
related to future events or expected changes in economic conditions. While management uses the best information available to make its
evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions. In addition,
regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses and may
require the Bank to make additions to the allowance based on their judgment about information available to them at the time of their
examinations.
F-13
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component includes loans management considers impaired
and other loans or groups of loans that management has classified with higher risk characteristics. For such loans that are classified as
impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan
is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience
adjusted for qualitative factors.
The allowance for loan losses represents a reserve for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for
loan losses is evaluated periodically based on a review of all significant loans, with a particular emphasis on non-accruing, past due and
other loans that management believes might be potentially impaired or warrant additional attention. The Company segregates the loan
portfolio by type of loan and utilizes this segregation in evaluating exposure to risks within the portfolio. In addition, based on internal
reviews and external reviews performed by independent loan reviewers and regulatory authorities, the Company further segregates the
loan portfolio by loan grades based on an assessment of risk for a particular loan or group of loans. Certain reviewed loans are assigned
specific allowances when a review of relevant data determines that a general allocation is not sufficient. In establishing allowances,
management considers historical loan loss experience but adjusts this data with a significant emphasis on data such as risk ratings,
current loan quality trends, current economic conditions and other factors in the markets where the Company operates. Factors
considered include, among others, current valuations of real estate in their markets, unemployment rates, the effect of weather conditions
on agricultural related entities and other significant local economic events.
The Company has developed a methodology for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses which is monitored by the
Company’s Chief Credit Officer. Procedures provide for the assignment of a risk rating for every loan included in the total loan portfolio,
with the exception of credit card receivables and overdraft protection loans which are treated as pools for risk rating purposes. The risk
rating schedule provides nine ratings of which five ratings are classified as pass ratings and four ratings are classified as criticized
ratings. Each risk rating is assigned a percentage factor of historical losses, calculated by loan type, to be applied to the balance of loans
by risk rating and type, to determine the adequate amount of reserve. Many of the larger loans require an annual review by an independent
loan officer or an independent third party loan review firm. As a result of these loan reviews, certain loans may be assigned specific
reserve allocations. Other loans that surface as problem loans may also be assigned specific reserves. Past due loans are assigned risk
ratings based on the number of days past due. The calculation of the allowance for loan losses, including underlying data and
assumptions, is reviewed regularly by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and the independent internal loan review department.
Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the collection of a loan’s principal is unlikely. Subsequent
recoveries are credited to the allowance. Consumer loans are charged-off in accordance with the Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council’s (“FFIEC”) Uniform Retail Credit Classification and Account Management Policy. Commercial loans are
charged-off when they are deemed uncollectible, which usually involves a triggering event within the collection effort. If the loan is
collateral dependent, the loss is more easily identified and is charged-off when it is identified, usually based upon receipt of an appraisal.
However, when a loan has guarantor support, and the guarantor demonstrates willingness and capacity to support the debt, the Company
may carry the estimated loss as a reserve against the loan while collection efforts with the guarantor are pursued. If, after collection
efforts with the guarantor are complete, the deficiency is still considered uncollectible, the loss is charged-off and any further collections
are treated as recoveries. In all situations, when a loan is downgraded to an Asset Quality Rating of 60 (Loss per the regulatory guidance),
the uncollectible portion is charged-off.
Premises and Equipment
Land is carried at cost. Other premises and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation computed on the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. In general, estimated lives for buildings are up to 40 years, furniture and equipment
useful lives range from three to 20 years and the lives of software and computer related equipment range from three to five
years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the related lease, or the related assets, whichever is shorter. Expenditures
for major improvements of the Company’s premises and equipment are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful
lives. Minor repairs, maintenance and improvements are charged to operations as incurred. When assets are sold or disposed of, their
cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in earnings.
F-14
FDIC Loss-Share Receivable
In connection with the Company’s FDIC-assisted acquisitions, the Company has recorded an FDIC loss-share receivable to reflect the
indemnification provided by the FDIC. Since the indemnified items are covered loans and covered foreclosed assets, which are initially
measured at fair value, the FDIC loss-share receivable is also initially measured and recorded at fair value, and is calculated by
discounting the cash flows expected to be received from the FDIC. These cash flows are estimated by multiplying estimated losses by
the reimbursement rates as set forth in the loss-share agreements. The balance of the FDIC loss-share receivable and the accretion (or
amortization) thereof is adjusted periodically to reflect changes in expectations of discounted cash flows, expense reimbursements under
the loss-share agreements and other factors. The Company is accreting (or amortizing) its FDIC loss-share receivable over the shorter
of the contractual term of the indemnification agreement (ten years for the single family loss share agreements, and five years for the
non-single family loss share agreements) or the remaining life of the indemnified asset.
Pursuant to the clawback provisions of the loss share agreements for the Company’s FDIC-assisted acquisitions, the Company may be
required to reimburse the FDIC should actual losses be less than certain thresholds established in each loss share agreement. The amount
of the clawback provision for each acquisition is measured and recorded at fair value. It is calculated as the difference between
management’s estimated losses on covered loans and covered foreclosed assets and the loss threshold contained in each loss share
agreement, multiplied by the applicable clawback provisions contained in each loss share agreement. This clawback amount, which is
payable to the FDIC upon termination of the applicable loss share agreement, is then discounted back to net present value, generally
over ten years. To the extent that actual losses on covered loans and covered foreclosed assets are less than estimated losses, the
applicable clawback payable to the FDIC upon termination of the loss share agreements will increase. To the extent that actual losses
on covered loans and covered foreclosed assets are more than estimated losses, the applicable clawback payable to the FDIC upon
termination of the loss share agreements will decrease. The balance of the FDIC clawback payable and the amortization thereof are
adjusted periodically to reflect changes in expected losses on covered assets and the impact of such changes on the clawback payable
and other factors. The FDIC loss-share receivable is reported net of the clawback liability.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets purchased in business combinations. Goodwill is required to
be tested annually for impairment or whenever events occur that may indicate that the recoverability of the carrying amount is not
probable. In the event of an impairment, the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value is charged to earnings. The
Company performs its annual test of impairment in the fourth quarter of each year.
Intangible assets consist of core deposit premiums acquired in connection with business combinations and are based on the established
value of acquired customer deposits. The core deposit premium is initially recognized based on a valuation performed as of the
consummation date and is amortized over an estimated useful life of five to seven years. Amortization periods are reviewed annually in
connection with the annual impairment testing of goodwill.
Cash Value of Bank Owned Life Insurance
The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain officers. The life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized
under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due
that are probable at settlement.
Other Real Estate Owned
Foreclosed assets acquired through or in lieu of loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less estimated
cost to sell. Any write-down to fair value at the time of transfer to foreclosed assets is charged to the allowance for loan
losses. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of
carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Costs of improvements are capitalized up to the fair value of the property, whereas costs
relating to holding foreclosed assets and subsequent adjustments to the value are charged to operations.
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or
liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet
assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.
In the event the future tax consequences of differences between the financial reporting bases and the tax bases of the assets and liabilities
results in deferred tax assets, an evaluation of the probability of being able to realize the future benefits indicated by such assets is
required. A valuation allowance is provided for the portion of the deferred tax asset when it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets, management considers the
scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies.
F-15
The Company currently evaluates income tax positions judged to be uncertain. A loss contingency reserve is accrued if it is probable
that the tax position will be challenged, it is probable that the future resolution of the challenge will confirm that a loss has been incurred,
and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters in other noninterest expenses.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for its stock compensation plans using a fair value based method whereby compensation cost is measured at the
grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. The Company
recorded approximately $2.1 million, $1.0 million and $1.0 million of stock-based compensation cost in 2014, 2013 and 2012,
respectively.
Treasury Stock
The Company’s repurchases of shares of its common stock are recorded at cost as treasury stock and result in a reduction of stockholders’
equity.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per common share are computed using the two-class method. Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net
income allocated to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the
year. Diluted earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income allocated to common shareholders by the effect of the
issuance of potential common shares that are dilutive and by the sum of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock
outstanding. Potential common shares consist of stock options and restricted shares for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013,
and are determined using the treasury stock method. Potential common shares consist of stock options, restricted shares and warrants
for the year ended December 31, 2012, and are determined using the treasury stock method. The Company has determined that its
outstanding non-vested stock awards are participating securities, and all dividends on these awards are paid similar to other dividends.
Presented below is a summary of the components used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share:
Distributed earnings allocated to common stockholders
Undistributed earnings allocated to common stockholders
Net income available to common shareholders
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive restricted grants
Effect of dilutive options
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to
calculate diluted earnings per share
2014
Years Ended December 31,
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
2012
$ 4,016
34,421
$ 38,437
25,974
15
270
-
$
18,280
$ 18,280
23,918
378
169
-
$
10,858
$ 10,858
23,816
-
41
26,259
24,465
23,857
For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company has excluded 6,000, 324,000 and 418,000, respectively, potential
common shares with strike prices that would cause them to be anti-dilutive.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The goal of the Company’s interest rate risk management process is to minimize the volatility in the net interest margin caused by
changes in interest rates. Derivative instruments are used to hedge certain assets or liabilities as a part of this process. The Company is
required to recognize certain contracts and commitments as derivatives when the characteristics of those contracts and commitments
meet the definition of a derivative. All derivative instruments are required to be carried at fair value on the balance sheet.
The Company’s current hedging strategies involve utilizing interest rate swaps classified as cash flow hedges. Cash flows related to
floating-rate assets and liabilities will fluctuate with changes in an underlying rate index. When effectively hedged, the increases or
decreases in cash flows related to the floating rate asset or liability will generally be offset by changes in cash flows of the derivative
instrument designated as a hedge. The fair value of derivatives is recognized as assets or liabilities in the financial statements. The
accounting for the changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative instrument at inception. The
change in fair value of the effective portion of cash flow hedges is accounted for in other comprehensive income rather than net income.
F-16
The Company had a cash flow hedge with notional amount of $37.1 million at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 for the purpose of
converting the variable rate on the junior subordinated debentures to a fixed rate. The fair value of these instruments amounted to a
liability of approximately $1.3 million and $370,000 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. No material hedge ineffectiveness
from cash flow hedges was recognized in the statement of income. All components of each derivative’s gain or loss are included in the
assessment of hedge effectiveness.
Mortgage Banking Derivatives
The Company maintains a risk management program to manage interest rate risk and pricing risk associated with its mortgage lending
activities. Commitments to fund mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for
the future delivery of these mortgage loans are accounted for as free standing derivatives. The fair value of the interest rate lock is
recorded at the time the commitment to fund the mortgage loan is executed and is adjusted for the expected exercise of the commitment
before the loan is funded. In order to hedge the change in interest rates resulting from its commitments to fund the loans, the Company
enters into forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans when interest rate locks are entered into. Fair values of these
mortgage derivatives are estimated based on changes in mortgage interest rates from the date the interest on the loan is locked. Changes
in the fair values of these derivatives are included in mortgage banking activity. The fair value of these instruments amounted to an
asset of approximately $1,757,000 and $1,180,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Comprehensive Income
The Company’s comprehensive income consists of net income, changes in the net unrealized holding gains and losses of securities
available for sale, unrealized gain or loss on the effective portion of the cash flow hedge and the realized gain or loss recognized due to
the sale or unwind of cash flow hedge prior to their contractual maturity date. These amounts are carried in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) on the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and are presented net of taxes.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in
a separate note. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk,
prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market
conditions could significantly affect these estimates.
Operating Segments
The Company has three reportable segments, the Banking Division, the Mortgage Division and the SBA Division. The Banking Division
derives its revenues from the delivery of full service financial services to include commercial loans, consumer loans and deposit
accounts. The Mortgage Division derives its revenues from the origination, sales and servicing of one-to-four family residential
mortgage loans. The SBA Division derives its revenues from the origination, sales and servicing of SBA loans. The Banking, Mortgage
and SBA Divisions are managed as separate business units because of the different products and services they provide. The Company
evaluates performance and allocates resources based on profit or loss from operations. There are no material intersegment sales or
transfers.
New Accounting Standards
ASU 2015-01- Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items (“ASU 2015-01”). ASU 2015-01 eliminates the concept of
extraordinary items by no longer allowing companies to segregate an extraordinary item from the results of operations, separately present
an extraordinary item on the income statement, or disclose income taxes or earnings-per-share data applicable to an extraordinary item.
ASU 2015-01 is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and
early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations,
financial position or disclosures.
ASU 2014-17 – Business Combinations: Pushdown Accounting (“ASU 2014-17”). ASU 2014-17 amends existing guidance related to
the accounting by an acquired entity upon a change-in-control event. The standard provides an acquired entity with an option to apply
pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired
entity. An acquired entity may elect the option to apply pushdown accounting in the reporting period in which the change-in-control
event occurs. If pushdown accounting is not applied in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs, an acquired
entity will have the option to elect to apply pushdown accounting in a subsequent reporting period to the acquired entity’s most recent
change-in-control event. ASU 2014-17 was effective on November 18, 2014. The adoption of this standard has not had a material
effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
F-17
ASU 2014-14 – Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors: Classification of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage
Loans Upon Foreclosure (“ASU 2014-14”). ASU 2014-14 amends existing guidance related to the classification of certain government-
guaranteed mortgage loans, including those guaranteed by the FHA and the VA, upon foreclosure. It requires that a mortgage loan be
derecognized and a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if three conditions are met. Upon foreclosure, the separate
other receivable should be measured based on the amount of the loan balance (principal and interest) expected to be recovered from the
guarantor. ASU 2014-14 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15,
2014, and early adoption is permitted. It can be applied using a prospective transition method or a modified retrospective transition
using a cumulative-effect adjustment. The Company is evaluating the impact this standard may have on the Company’s results of
operations, financial position or disclosures.
ASU 2014-12 – Compensation – Stock Compensation – Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide
That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved After the Requisite Service Period (“ASU 2014-12”). ASU 2014-12 amends existing
guidance related to the accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be
achieved after the requisite service period. The standard requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved
after the requisite service period should be treated as a performance condition. ASU 2014-12 is effective for annual periods and interim
periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and early adoption is permitted. It can be applied either
prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are
outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards
thereafter. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial
condition.
ASU 2014-11 – Transfers and Servicing – Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures (“ASU
2014-11”). ASU 2014-11 aligns the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions and repurchase agreements executed as a
repurchase financing with the accounting for other typical repurchase agreements. ASU 2014-11 requires that these transactions all be
accounted for as secured borrowings. The standard requires a new disclosure for transactions economically similar to repurchase
agreements in which the transferor retains substantially all of the exposure to the economic return on the transferred financial assets
throughout the term of the transaction and requires expanded disclosures about the nature of collateral pledged in repurchase
agreements and similar transactions accounted for as secured borrowings. ASU 2014-11 is effective for the first interim or annual
period beginning after December 15, 2014. An entity is required to present changes in accounting for transactions outstanding on the
effective date as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Earlier application
for a public business entity is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on the Company’s
results of operations, financial position or disclosures.
ASU 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 provides guidance that an entity should
recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which
the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 is effective prospectively, for annual and interim
periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on the Company’s
results of operations, financial position or disclosures.
ASU 2014-04 – Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (“ASU 2014-04”). ASU 2014-04 clarifies when a creditor
should reclassify mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate from loans to other real estate owned. It defines when an in-
substance repossession or foreclosure has occurred and when a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential
real estate collateralizing a mortgage loan. ASU 2014-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2014, and early
adoption is permitted. It can be applied either prospectively or using a modified retrospective transition method. The Company is
evaluating the impact this standard may have on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.
ASU 2013-11 - Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax
Credit Carryforward Exists (“ASU 2013-11”). ASU 2013-11 requires that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized
tax benefit, be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar
tax loss or a tax credit carryforward. However, if a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward is not
available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result
from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does
not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as
a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. ASU 2013-11 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within
those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of these revisions did not have a material impact on the Company’s
results of operations, financial position or disclosures.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of prior year amounts have been made to conform with the current year presentations.
F-18
NOTE 2. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Coastal Bankshares, Inc.
On June 30, 2014, the Company completed its acquisition of The Coastal Bankshares, Inc. (“Coastal”), a bank holding company
headquartered in Savannah, Georgia. Upon consummation of the acquisition, Coastal was merged with and into the Company, with
Ameris as the surviving entity in the merger. At that time, Coastal’s wholly owned banking subsidiary, The Coastal Bank (“Coastal
Bank”), was also merged with and into the Bank. The acquisition grew the Company’s existing market presence, as Coastal Bank had
a total of six banking locations in Chatham, Liberty and Effingham Counties, Georgia. Coastal’s common shareholders received 0.4671
of a share of the Company's common stock in exchange for each share of Coastal’s common stock. As a result, the Company issued
1,598,998 common shares at a fair value of $34.5 million and paid $2.8 million cash in exchange for outstanding warrants.
The acquisition of Coastal was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business
Combinations. Assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration exchanged were recorded at their respective acquisition date fair
values. Determining the fair value of assets and liabilities is a complicated process involving significant judgment regarding methods
and assumptions used to calculate estimated fair values. Fair values are preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after
the closing date of the acquisition as additional information regarding the closing date fair values becomes available. During the third
quarter of 2014, management revised its initial estimates regarding the valuation of other real estate owned. In addition, during the third
and fourth quarters of 2014, management continued its assessment and recorded the deferred tax assets resulting from differences in the
carrying values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their basis for income tax purposes. This
estimate also reflects acquired net operating loss carryforwards and other acquired assets with built-in losses that are expected to be
settled or otherwise recovered in future periods where the realization of such benefits would be subject to applicable limitations under
Sections 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Management continues to evaluate fair value adjustments related to
deferred tax assets, pending the filing of the file tax return for Coastal.
F-19
The following table presents the assets acquired and liabilities of Coastal assumed as of June 30, 2014 and their fair value estimates:
(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing balances
Investment securities
Other investments
Mortgage loans held for sale
Loans
Less allowance for loan losses
Loans, net
Other real estate owned
Premises and equipment
Intangible assets
Cash value of bank owned life insurance
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing
Interest-bearing
Total deposits
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase
Other borrowings
Other liabilities
Subordinated deferrable interest debentures
Total liabilities
Net identifiable assets acquired over (under) liabilities
assumed
Goodwill
Net assets acquired over (under) liabilities assumed
Consideration:
As Recorded by
Coastal
Initial Fair
Value
Adjustments
Subsequent
Fair Value
Adjustments
As Recorded
by Ameris
$
$
$
$
3,895 $
15,923
67,266
975
7,288
296,141
(3,218 )
292,923
14,992
11,882
507
7,812
14,898
438,361 $
-
-
(500 )(a)
-
-
(16,700 )(b)
3,218 (c)
(13,482 )
(3,528 )(d)
-
4,266 (e)
-
-
(13,244 )
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(2,600 )(g)
-
(231 )(h)
-
(752 )(i)
$
3,895
15,923
66,766
975
7,288
279,441
-
279,441
8,864
11,882
4,542
7,812
14,146
$ 421,534
$
(3,583 )
80,012 $
289,012
369,024
$
-
-
-
5,428
22,005
6,192
15,465
418,114
-
-
-
(6,413 )(f)
(6,413 )
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
80,012
289,012
369,024
5,428
22,005
6,192
9,052
411,701
20,247
-
20,247 $
(6,831 )
23,854
17,023
(3,583 )
3,583
-
$
9,833
27,437
37,270
$
$
Ameris Bancorp common shares issued
Purchase price per share of the Company's common
stock
Company common stock issued
Cash exchanged for shares
Fair value of total consideration transferred
$
$
1,598,998
21.56
34,474
2,796
37,270
Explanation of fair value adjustments
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments of the available for sale portfolio as of the acquisition date.
Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company’s evaluation of the acquired loan portfolio.
Adjustment reflects the elimination of Coastal’s allowance for loan losses.
Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment based on the Company’s evaluation of the acquired OREO portfolio.
F-20
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
Adjustment reflects the recording of core deposit intangible on the acquired core deposit accounts.
Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment to the subordinated deferrable interest debentures at the acquisition date.
Adjustment reflects the additional fair value adjustment based on the Company’s evaluation of the acquired OREO
portfolio.
Adjustment reflects final recording of core deposit intangible on the acquired core deposit accounts.
Adjustment reflects the deferred taxes on the difference in the carrying values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities
for financial reporting purposes and their basis for federal income tax purposes.
Goodwill of $27.4 million, which is the excess of the merger consideration over the fair value of net assets acquired, was recorded in
the Coastal acquisition and is the result of expected operational synergies and other factors. This goodwill is not expected to be
deductible for tax purposes.
The results of operations of Coastal subsequent to the acquisition date are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of
operations. The following unaudited pro forma information reflects the Company’s estimated consolidated results of operations as if
the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2013, unadjusted for potential cost savings (in thousands).
Net interest income and noninterest income
Net income
Net income available to common stockholders
Income per common share available to common stockholders – basic
Income per common share available to common stockholders – diluted
Average number of shares outstanding, basic
Average number of shares outstanding, diluted
Year Ended December 31,
2013
2014
$ 223,281
$ 36,855
$ 36,569
$
$
1.33
1.31
27,573
27,858
$ 183,459
$ 21,397
$ 19,659
$
$
0.77
0.76
25,517
25,947
In the acquisition, the Company purchased $279.4 million of loans at fair value, net of $16.7 million, or 5.64%, estimated discount to
the outstanding principal balance. Of the total loans acquired, management identified $29.3 million that were considered to be credit
impaired and are accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30. The table below summarizes the total contractually required principal and
interest cash payment, management’s estimate of expected total cash payments and fair value of the loans as of acquisition date for
purchased credit impaired loans. Contractually required principal and interest payment have been adjusted for estimated prepayments.
Contractually required principal and interest
Non-accretable difference
Cash flows expected to be collected
Accretable yield
Total purchased credit-impaired loans acquired
$
$
38,194
(5,632)
32,562
(3,282)
29,280
Prosperity Banking Company
On December 23, 2013, the Company completed its acquisition of The Prosperity Banking Company (“Prosperity”), a bank holding
company headquartered in Saint Augustine, Florida. At that time, Prosperity’s wholly owned banking subsidiary, Prosperity Bank
(“Prosperity Bank”), was merged with and into the Bank. Prosperity Bank had a total of 12 banking locations, with the majority of the
franchise concentrated in northeast Florida. Upon consummation of the acquisition, Prosperity was merged with and into the Company,
with Ameris as the surviving entity in the merger. Prosperity’s common shareholders were entitled to elect to receive either 3.125 shares
of the Company's common stock or $41.50 in cash in exchange for each share of Prosperity’s voting common stock. As a result, the
Company issued 1,168,918 common shares at a fair value of $24.6 million.
F-21
The acquisition of Prosperity was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business
Combinations. Assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration exchanged were recorded at their respective acquisition date fair
values. Determining the fair value of assets and liabilities is a complicated process involving significant judgment regarding methods
and assumptions used to calculate estimated fair values. During the fourth quarter of 2014, management adjusted the deferred tax assets
resulting from differences in the carrying values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their
basis for income tax purposes. This estimate also reflects acquired net operating loss carryforwards and other acquired assets with built-
in losses that are expected to be settled or otherwise recovered in future periods where the realization of such benefits would be subject
to applicable limitations under Sections 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
The following table presents the assets acquired and liabilities of Prosperity assumed as of December 23, 2013 and their fair value
estimates:
(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing balances
Investment securities
Other investments
Loans
Less allowance for loan losses
Loans, net
Other real estate owned
Premises and equipment
Intangible assets
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing
Interest-bearing
Total deposits
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase
Other borrowings
Other liabilities
Subordinated deferrable interest debentures
Total liabilities
Net identifiable assets acquired over (under) liabilities
assumed
Goodwill
Net assets acquired over (under) liabilities assumed
Consideration:
As Recorded by
Prosperity
Initial Fair
Value
Adjustments
Subsequent
Fair Value
Adjustments
As Recorded
by Ameris
$
$
$
4,285 $
21,687
151,863
8,727
487,358
(6,811 )
480,547
6,883
36,293
174
26,600
737,059 $
$
-
-
411 (a)
-
(37,662 )(b)
6,811 (c)
(30,851 )
(1,260 )(d)
-
4,383 (e)
1,192 (f)
(26,125 )
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,060 )(j)
(1,060 )
4,285
21,687
152,274
8,727
449,696
-
449,696
5,623
36,293
4,557
26,732
$ 709,874
149,242 $
324,441
473,683
$
-
-
-
21,530
185,000
14,058
29,500
723,771
-
12,313 (g)
455 (h)
(16,303 )(i)
(3,535 )
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 149,242
324,441
473,683
21,530
197,313
14,513
13,197
720,236
13,288
-
13,288 $
(22,590 )
34,093
11,503
(1,060 )
1,060
-
$
$
(10,362 )
35,153
24,791
$
Ameris Bancorp common shares issued
Purchase price per share of the Company's common
stock
Company common stock issued
Cash exchanged for shares
Fair value of total consideration transferred
$
$
1,168,918
21.07
24,629
162
24,791
F-22
Explanation of fair value adjustments
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments of the available for sale portfolio as of the acquisition date.
Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustments based on the Company’s evaluation of the acquired loan portfolio.
Adjustment reflects the elimination of Prosperity’s allowance for loan losses.
Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment based on the Company’s evaluation of the acquired OREO portfolio.
Adjustment reflects the recording of core deposit intangible on the acquired core deposit accounts.
Adjustment reflects the adjustment to write-off the non-realizable portion of Prosperity’s deferred tax asset of ($6.644
million), to record the deferred tax asset generated by purchase accounting adjustments of $8.435 million and to record
the fair value adjustment of other assets of ($0.599 million) at the acquisition date.
Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment (premium) to the FHLB borrowings of $12.741 million and the fair value
adjustment to the subordinated debt of $0.428 million.
Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment of other liabilities at the acquisition date.
Adjustment reflects the fair value adjustment to the subordinated deferrable interest debentures s at the acquisition date.
Adjustment reflects the deferred taxes on the difference in the carrying values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities
for financial reporting purposes and their basis for federal income tax purposes.
Goodwill of $35.2 million, which is the excess of the merger consideration over the fair value of net assets acquired, was recorded
in the Prosperity acquisition and is the result of expected operational synergies and other factors. This goodwill is not expected to
be deductible for tax purposes.
The results of operations of Prosperity subsequent to the acquisition date are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of
income. The following unaudited pro forma information reflects the Company’s estimated consolidated results of income as if the
acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2012, unadjusted for potential cost savings (in thousands).
Net interest income and noninterest income
Net income
Net income available to common shareholders
Net income common share available to common shareholders – basic
Net income per common share available to common shareholders –
diluted
Average number shares outstanding, basic
Average number shares outstanding, diluted
Year Ended December 31,
Unaudited
2013
$ 187,927
$ 19,927
$ 18,189
.73
$
2012
$ 199,089
$ 15,604
$ 12,027
.48
$
$
.71
$
.48
25,087
25,634
24,985
25,026
In the acquisition, the Company purchased $449.7 million of loans at fair value, net of $37.7 million, or 7.73%, estimated discount to
the outstanding principal balance. Of the total loans acquired, management identified $67.2 million that were considered to be credit
impaired and are accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30. The table below summarizes the total contractually required principal and
interest cash payment, management’s estimate of expected total cash payments and fair value of the loans as of acquisition date for
purchased credit impaired loans. Contractually required principal and interest payment have been adjusted for estimated prepayments.
Contractually required principal and interest
Non-accretable difference
Cash flows expected to be collected
Accretable yield
Total purchased credit-impaired loans acquired
$
$
92,461
(14,311)
78,150
(10,985)
67,165
F-23
On the dates of acquisition, the Company estimated the future cash flows on each individual loan and made the necessary adjustments
to reflect the asset at fair value. At each quarter end subsequent to the acquisition dates, the Company revises the estimates of future
cash flows based on current information and makes the necessary adjustments to carrying value. The adjustments are performed on a
loan-by-loan basis and have resulted in the Company recording an $84,000 provision for loan loss expense during the year ended
December 31, 2014. There were no adjustments needed during the year ended December 31, 2013.
A rollforward of purchased non-covered loans for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 is shown below:
(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance, January 1 ................................................................ $
Charge-offs, net of recoveries ...............................................
Additions due to acquisitions ................................................
Accretion ...............................................................................
Transfers to purchased non-covered other real estate owned
Transfer from covered loans due to loss share expiration .....
Payments received.................................................................
Ending balance ...................................................................... $
2014
448,753
(84)
279,441
9,745
(4,160)
15,475
(74,931)
674,239
2013
-
-
449,696
-
-
-
(943)
448,753
$
$
The following is a summary of changes in the accretable discounts of purchased non-covered loans during years ended December 31,
2014 and 2013:
(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance, January 1 ........................................................................ $
Additions due to acquisitions ........................................................
Accretion ......................................................................................
Transfers between non-accretable and accretable discounts, net ..
Ending balance .............................................................................. $
2014
26,189
7,799
(9,745)
1,473
25,716
2013
-
26,189
-
-
26,189
$
$
F-24
NOTE 3. ASSETS ACQUIRED IN FDIC-ASSISTED ACQUISITIONS
From October 2009 through July 2012, the Company has participated in ten FDIC-assisted acquisitions (the “acquisitions”) whereby
the Company purchased certain failed institutions out of the FDIC’s receivership. These institutions include:
Bank Acquired
American United Bank (“AUB”)
United Security Bank (“USB”)
Satilla Community Bank (“SCB”)
First Bank of Jacksonville (“FBJ”)
Tifton Banking Company (“TBC”)
Darby Bank & Trust (“DBT”)
High Trust Bank (“HTB”)
One Georgia Bank (“OGB”)
Central Bank of Georgia (“CBG”)
Montgomery Bank & Trust (“MBT”)
Location:
Lawrenceville, Ga.
Sparta, Ga.
St. Marys, Ga.
Jacksonville, Fl.
Tifton, Ga.
Vidalia, Ga.
Stockbridge, Ga.
Atlanta, Ga.
Ellaville, Ga.
Ailey, Ga.
Branches:
1
2
1
2
1
7
2
1
5
2
Date Acquired
October 23, 2009
November 6, 2009
May 14, 2010
October 22, 2010
November 12, 2010
November 12, 2010
July 15, 2011
July 15, 2011
February 24, 2012
July 6, 2012
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisitions,
as well as key elements of the purchase and assumption agreements between the FDIC and the Bank (in thousands):
AUB
USB
SCB
FBJ
TBC
DBT
HTB
OGB
CBG
MBT
Assets acquired
Cash ......................................... $
Investment securities ...............
Federal funds sold ....................
Loans .......................................
Foreclosed property .................
FDIC loss share asset ...............
Core deposit intangible ............
Other assets ..............................
26,452 $
10,242
-
56,482
2,165
24,200
187
1,266
41,490 $ (33,093) $ 10,669 $ 4,862 $ (58,158) $ 36,432 $ 1,585 $ 65,050 $ 155,466
-
105,562
8,335
-
2,605
-
1,218
261,340
83,646
-
22,026
8,069
-
112,404
21,640
-
1,180
386
183
3,957
3,001
39,920
-
74,843 124,782
6,177
52,654
1,149
3,457
7,060
-
92,568
3,472
22,807
175
1,092
10,814
12,661
68,751
2,012
22,400
185
612
7,343
5,690
40,454
1,816
11,307
132
298
14,770
-
84,732
10,272
49,485
-
1,772
7,242
45,488
-
2,933
28,891
5,070
Total assets acquired .............
120,994
169,172
84,342
77,709
132,036
448,311
197,463
166,052 293,189 156,867
Liabilities assumed
Deposits ...................................
FHLB advances .......................
Other liabilities ........................
Total liabilities assumed ........
100,470
7,802
277
108,549
141,094
1,504
453
143,051
75,530
-
604
76,134
71,869
2,613
842
132,939
-
53
75,324 132,992
386,958
2,724
54,418
444,100
175,887 136,101
- 21,107
899
178,541 158,107
2,654
261,036 156,699
-
168
273,152 156,867
10,334
1,782
Net assets acquired ................ $
12,445 $
26,121 $ 8,208
$
2,385 $
(956)
$
4,211
$ 18,922 $ 7,945
$ 20,037 $
-
Each acquisition with loss sharing agreements has separate agreements for the single family residential assets (“SFR”) and the non-
single family assets (“NSF”). The SFR agreements cover losses and recoveries for ten years. The NSF agreements are for eight years.
During the first five years, losses and recoveries are covered. During the final three years, only recoveries, net of expenses, are covered.
The AUB SFR agreement was terminated during 2012 and Ameris received a payment of $87,000. The AUB and USB NSF agreements
passed their five year anniversary during the fourth quarter of 2014 and losses will no longer be reimbursed. The remaining NSF assets
for these two agreements have been reclassified to purchased non-covered loans and purchased non-covered other real estate owned.
The failed bank bidding process was a competitive process and the FDIC offered a variety of reimbursement structures. The AUB and
USB agreements were structured to reimburse combined SFR and NSF losses up to a threshold at 80% ($38 million for AUB and $46
million for USB) with losses in excess of the threshold reimbursed at 95%. For SCB, FBJ, TBC, HTB, OGB, and CBG all losses under
the agreements are reimbursed at 80%. For DBT, the losses under the SFR and NSF agreements have separate thresholds and
reimbursement percentages. Under the SFR agreement, losses up to $8.4 million were reimbursed at 80%, losses between $8.4 million
and $11.8 million were reimbursed at 30%, and losses in excess of $11.8 million will be reimbursed at 80%. Under this agreement,
losses of $14.5 million have been incurred and all future losses will be reimbursed at 80%. Under the NSF agreement, losses up to
$123.4 million will be reimbursed at 80%, losses between $123.4 million and $181.3 million will be reimbursed at 30%, and losses in
excess of $181.3 million will be reimbursed at 80%. Under this agreement, losses of $110.2 million have been incurred. MBT did not
have a loss sharing agreement.
The results of operations of CBG and MBT subsequent to the acquisition date are included in the Company’s consolidated statements
of income. The following unaudited pro forma information reflects the Company’s estimated consolidated results of operations as if the
acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2012, unadjusted for potential cost savings (in thousands).
F-25
Net interest income and noninterest income
Net loss
Net loss available to common shareholders
Loss per common share available to common shareholders – basic and
diluted
Average number shares outstanding, basic
Average number shares outstanding, diluted
Year Ended
December 31, 2012
$ 176,262
$ (10,233)
$ (13,810)
$
(0.58)
23,816
23,857
The CBG acquisition resulted in a gain of $20.0 million, before tax, which is included in the Company’s December 31, 2012 consolidated
statement of income. Due to the difference in tax bases of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the Bank recorded a deferred tax
liability of $7.0 million, resulting in an after-tax gain of $13.0 million during 2012. The MBT acquisition did not result in a gain or loss
during 2012.
The following table presents the loans receivable (in thousands) at the 2012 acquisition date for loans with deterioration in credit
quality.
2012 Acquisitions:
Contractually required principal payments receivable
Non-accretable difference
Present value of cash flows expected to be collected
Accretable difference
Fair value of loans acquired with deterioration of credit quality
CBG
MBT
Total
(Dollars in Thousands)
$137,407
53,603
83,804
10,390
$ 73,414
$ - $ 137,407
53,603
-
83,804
-
-
10,390
- $ 73,414
$
F-26
The following table summarizes components of all covered assets at December 31, 2014 and 2013 and their origin. The FDIC loss-
share receivable is shown net of the clawback liability.
As of December 31, 2014:
Covered loans
Less Fair Value
adjustments
Total
covered
loans
OREO
Less Fair
value
adjustments
(Dollars in thousands)
Total
covered
OREO
Total
covered
assets
FDIC loss-
share
receivable
AUB ................................... $
- $
-
$
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
188
USB ....................................
4,350
SCB ....................................
26,686
150
602
4,200
165
-
165
4,365
(1,197)
26,084
2,849
389
2,460
28,544
1,828
FBJ .....................................
21,243
1,825
19,418
632
DBT ....................................
64,338
6,437
57,901
6,655
TBC ....................................
23,487
1,117
22,370
2,388
0
514
367
632
20,050
1,885
6,141
64,042
6,860
2,021
24,391
3,287
HTB ....................................
52,699
5,120
47,579
3,670
1,283
2,387
49,966
6,459
OGB ...................................
42,971
3,785
39,186
2,244
39
2,205
41,391
3,906
CBG....................................
60,950
6,409
54,541
4,805
909
3,896
58,437
8,135
Total............................. $
296,724 $
25,445
$
271,279 $
23,408
$
3,501
$
19,907 $ 291,186
$
31,351
Covered loans
Les s : Credit ris k adjus tments
Les s : Liquidity and rate adjus tments
Total covered loans
OREO
Les s : Fair value adjus tments
Total covered OREO
Total covered as s ets
FDIC indemni fication as s et
As of December 31, 2013:
AUB ................................... $
15,787 $
231
$
15,556 $
4,264 $
- $
4,264 $
19,820 $
1,452
USB ....................................
18,504
1,427
17,077
2,865
SCB ....................................
34,637
1,483
33,154
3,461
FBJ .....................................
25,891
3,730
22,161
1,880
141
303
242
2,724
19,801
889
3,158
36,312
3,175
1,638
23,799
3,689
DBT ....................................
105,157
17,819
87,338
17,023
1,282
15,741
103,079
18,724
TBC ....................................
32,590
2,354
30,236
4,844
745
4,099
34,335
3,721
HTB ....................................
67,126
7,359
59,767
6,374
2,304
4,070
63,837
9,325
OGB ...................................
58,512
5,067
53,445
7,506
2,984
4,522
57,967
9,645
CBG....................................
85,118
13,615
71,503
7,610
1,933
5,677
77,180
14,821
Total............................. $
443,322 $
53,085
$
390,237 $
55,827
$
9,934
$
45,893 $ 436,130
$
65,441
F-27
A rollforward of acquired covered loans for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 is shown below:
(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance, January 1 ................................................................ $
Charge-offs, net of recoveries ...............................................
Accretion ...............................................................................
Transfers to covered other real estate owned ........................
Transfer to purchased, non-covered loans due to loss share
expiration..........................................................................
Payments received.................................................................
Other .....................................................................................
Ending balance ...................................................................... $
2014
390,237
(9,255)
22,188
(13,650)
(15,475)
(102,996)
230
271,279
2013
507,712
(7,695)
42,208
(31,833)
-
(120,155)
-
390,237
$
$
The following is a summary of changes in the accretable discounts of acquired covered loans during the years ended December 31, 2014
and 2013:
Balance, beginning of year
Accretion
Transfers between non-accretable and accretable discounts, net
Balance, end of year
2014
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 25,493
(22,188)
12,273
$ 15,578
$16,698
(42,208)
51,003
$ 25,493
The shared-loss agreements are subject to the servicing procedures as specified in the agreement with the FDIC. The expected
reimbursements under the shared-loss agreements were recorded as an indemnification asset at their estimated fair values on the
acquisition dates. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company has recorded a clawback liability of $6.2 million and $5.0 million,
respectively, which represents the obligation of the Company to reimburse the FDIC should actual losses be less than certain thresholds
established in each loss share agreement. Changes in the FDIC loss-share receivable are as follows:
Beginning balance
Payments received from FDIC
Accretion (amortization)
Change in clawback liability
Increase in receivable due to:
Charge-offs on covered loans
Write downs of covered other real estate owned
Reimbursable expenses on covered assets
Other activity, net
Ending balance
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2013
2014
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 65,441
$ 159,724
(22,494)
(18,449)
(1,222)
(68,822)
(34,533)
(3,398)
3,372
4,771
1,078
(1,146)
$ 31,351
6,156
13,117
5,820
(12,623)
$ 65,441
F-28
NOTE 4. SECURITIES
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available for sale with gross unrealized gains and losses are summarized as
follows:
December 31, 2014:
U.S. Government sponsored agencies
State, county and municipal securities
Corporate debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Total debt securities
December 31, 2013:
U.S. Government sponsored agencies
State, county and municipal securities
Corporate debt securities
Collateralized debt obligations
Mortgage-backed securities
Total debt securities
Amortized
Cost
$ 14,953
137,873
10,812
369,581
$ 533,219
$ 14,947
112,659
10,311
1,480
349,441
$ 488,838
Gross
Gross
Unrealized
Unrealized
Gains
Losses
(Dollars in Thousands)
Estimated
Fair
Value
$
-
3,935
228
6,534
$ 10,697
$
-
2,269
275
-
2,347
$ 4,891
$
(275)
(433)
-
(1,403)
$ (2,111)
$ (1,021)
(2,174)
(261)
-
(4,038)
$ (7,494)
$ 14,678
141,375
11,040
374,712
$ 541,805
$ 13,926
112,754
10,325
1,480
347,750
$ 486,235
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value of securities aggregated by category and length of time
that securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Description of Securities
December 31, 2014:
U. S. Government sponsored agencies
State, county and municipal securities
Corporate debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Total temporarily impaired securities
December 31, 2013:
U. S. Government sponsored agencies
State, county and municipal securities
Corporate debt securities
Collateralized debt obligations
Mortgage-backed securities
Total temporarily impaired securities
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or More
Total
Estimated
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair
Unrealized
Value
Losses
(Dollars in Thousands)
Estimated
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
$
-
$
15,038
-
36,760
(70)
-
(221)
- $ 14,678
19,665
-
46,812
$ 81,155
$
(275)
(363)
-
(1,182)
$ 14,678
34,703
-
83,572
$
(275)
(433)
-
(1,403)
$ 51,798
$
(291)
$ (1,820)
$ 132,953
$ (2,111)
$ 13,926
47,401
-
-
94,989
$ (1,021) $
(1,882)
-
-
(2,493)
-
3,794
4,826
-
23,388
$ 32,008
$
-
(292)
(261)
-
(1,545)
$ 13,926
51,195
4,826
-
118,377
$ (1,021)
(2,174)
(261)
-
(4,038)
$ 156,316
$ (5,396)
$ (2,098)
$ 188,324
$ (7,494)
As of December 31, 2014, the Company’s security portfolio consisted of 340 securities, 66 of which were in an unrealized loss position.
The majority of unrealized losses are related to the Company’s mortgage-backed and state, county and municipal securities, as discussed
below.
At December 31, 2014, the Company held 37 mortgage backed securities that were in an unrealized loss position, all of which were
issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates
and illiquidity, and not credit quality, and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these mortgage-backed securities and it
F-29
is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the Company does not consider these securities
to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2014.
At December 31, 2014, the Company held 26 state, county and municipal securities and 3 U.S. government sponsored agency securities
that were in an unrealized loss position. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates, and not credit quality,
and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities
before their anticipated recovery, the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December
31, 2014.
During 2014 and 2013, the Company received timely and current interest and principal payments on all of the securities classified as
corporate debt securities, except for one security that began deferring interest during the fourth quarter of 2010. The Company’s
investments in subordinated debt include investments in regional and super-regional banks on which the Company prepares regular
analysis through review of financial information or credit ratings. Investments in preferred securities are also concentrated in the
preferred obligations of regional and super-regional banks through non-pooled investment structures. The Company did not have
investments in “pooled” trust preferred securities at December 31, 2014 or 2013.
Management and the Company’s Asset and Liability Committee (the “ALCO Committee”) evaluate securities for other-than-temporary
impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. While the
majority of the unrealized losses on debt securities relate to changes in interest rates, corporate debt securities have also been affected
by reduced levels of liquidity and higher risk premiums. Occasionally, management engages independent third parties to evaluate the
Company’s position in certain corporate debt securities to aid management and the ALCO Committee in its determination regarding the
status of impairment. The Company believes that each investment poses minimal credit risk and further, that the Company does not
intend to sell these investment securities at an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2014, and it is more likely than not that the
Company will not be required to sell these securities prior to recovery or maturity. Therefore, at December 31, 2014, these investments
are not considered impaired on an other-than-temporary basis.
At December 31, 2014 and 2013, all of the Company’s mortgage-backed securities were obligations of government-sponsored agencies.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities available for sale as of December 31, 2014, by contractual maturity are
shown below. Maturities may differ from contractual maturities in mortgage-backed securities because the mortgages underlying the
securities may be called or repaid without penalty. Securities not due at a single maturity date are shown separately. Therefore, these
securities are not included in the maturity categories in the following maturity summary.
Due in one year or less
Due from one year to five years
Due from five to ten years
Due after ten years
Mortgage-backed securities
Estimated
Fair
Amortized
Cost
Value
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 5,693
45,110
63,043
49,792
369,581
$ 533,219
$ 5,757
46,340
64,201
50,795
374,712
$ 541,805
Securities with a carrying value of approximately $286.6 million and $399.0 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, serve
as collateral to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes required or permitted by
law.
F-30
Gains and losses on sales of securities available for sale consist of the following:
Gross gains on sales of securities
Gross losses on sales of securities
Net realized gains on sales of securities available for sale
NOTE 5. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Loans
December 31,
2014
2013
2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 141
(3)
$ 138
$ 353
(182)
$ 171
$ 420
(98)
$ 322
The Bank engages in a full complement of lending activities, including real estate-related loans, agriculture-related loans, commercial
and financial loans and consumer installment loans within select markets in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina. The Bank
concentrates the majority of its lending activities in real estate loans. While risk of loss in the Company’s portfolio is primarily tied to
the credit quality of the various borrowers, risk of loss may increase due to factors beyond the Company’s control, such as local, regional
and/or national economic downturns. General conditions in the real estate market may also impact the relative risk in the real estate
portfolio.
A substantial portion of the Bank’s loans are secured by real estate in the Bank’s primary market area. In addition, a substantial portion
of the OREO is located in those same markets. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of the Bank’s loan
portfolio and the recovery of a substantial portion of the carrying amount of OREO are susceptible to changes in real estate conditions
in the Bank’s primary market area.
Commercial, financial and agricultural loans include both secured and unsecured loans for working capital, expansion, crop production,
and other business purposes. Short-term working capital loans are secured by non-real estate collateral such as accounts receivable,
crops, inventory and equipment. The Company evaluates the financial strength, cash flow, management, credit history of the borrower
and the quality of the collateral securing the loan. The Bank often requires personal guarantees and secondary sources of repayment on
commercial, financial and agricultural loans.
Real estate loans include construction and development loans, commercial and farmland loans and residential loans. Construction and
development loans include loans for the development of residential neighborhoods, construction of one-to-four family residential
construction loans to builders and consumers, and commercial real estate construction loans, primarily for owner-occupied properties.
The Company limits its construction lending risk through adherence to established underwriting procedures. Commercial real estate
loans include loans secured by owner-occupied commercial buildings for office, storage, retail, farmland and warehouse space. They
also include non-owner occupied commercial buildings such as leased retail and office space. Commercial real estate loans may be
larger in size and may involve a greater degree of risk than one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. Payments on such loans are
often dependent on successful operation or management of the properties. The Company's residential loans represent permanent
mortgage financing and are secured by residential properties located within the Bank's market areas.
Consumer installment loans and other loans include automobile loans, boat and recreational vehicle financing, and both secured and
unsecured personal loans. Consumer loans carry greater risks than other loans, as the collateral can consist of rapidly depreciating assets
such as automobiles and equipment that may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the loan in the case of default.
F-31
Loans are stated at unpaid balances, net of unearned income and deferred loan fees. Balances within the major loans receivable categories
are presented in the following table:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Other
Allowance for loan losses
Loans, net
December 31,
2014
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 244,373
$ 319,654
146,371
808,323
351,886
34,249
33,252
161,507
907,524
456,106
30,782
14,308
1,889,881
21,157
$1,868,724
1,618,454
22,377
$1,596,077
Purchased non-covered loans are defined as loans that were acquired in bank acquisitions that are not covered by a loss-sharing
agreement with the FDIC. Loans that were previously classified as covered loans where the loss-sharing agreements have expired are
also included in purchased non-covered loans. Purchased non-covered loans totaling $674.2 million and $448.8 million at December 31,
2014 and 2013, respectively, are not included in the above schedule.
The carrying value of purchased non-covered loans are shown below according to loan type as of the end of the years shown:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
2014
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 38,041
58,362
306,706
266,342
4,788
$674,239
$ 32,141
31,176
179,898
200,851
4,687
$448,753
Covered loans are defined as loans that were acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions that are covered by a loss-sharing agreement with
the FDIC. Covered loans totaling $271.3 million and $390.2 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, are not included in
the above schedule.
The carrying value of covered loans are shown below according to loan type as of the end of the years shown:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
F-32
2013
2014
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 21,467
23,447
147,627
78,520
218
$ 271,279
$ 26,550
43,179
224,451
95,173
884
$ 390,237
Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans
A loan is placed on non-accrual status when, in management’s judgment, the collection of the interest income appears doubtful. Interest
receivable that has been accrued and is subsequently determined to have doubtful collectability is charged to interest income. Interest
on loans that are classified as non-accrual is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received until the loans are
returned to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought
current and future payments are reasonably assured. Past due loans are loans whose principal or interest is past due 90 days or more. In
some cases, where borrowers are experiencing financial difficulties, loans may be restructured to provide terms significantly different
from the original contractual terms. Loans on nonaccrual status, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans, amounted to
approximately $21.7 million, $29.2 million and $38.9 million at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Purchased non-
covered loans on nonaccrual status amounted to approximately $18.2 million and $6.7 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013,
respectively.
The following table presents an analysis of loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis, excluding purchased non-covered and covered
loans:
2014
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
$ 1,672
3,774
8,141
7,663
478
$ 21,728
$ 4,103
3,971
8,566
12,152
411
$ 29,203
The following table presents an analysis of purchased non-covered loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
2013
2014
(Dollars in Thousands)
$
175
1,119
10,242
6,644
69
$ 18,249
$
11
325
1,653
4,658
12
$ 6,659
The following table presents an analysis of covered loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
2013
2014
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 8,541
7,601
12,584
6,595
91
$ 35,412
$ 7,257
14,781
33,495
13,278
341
$ 69,152
F-33
The following table presents an analysis of loans, excluding purchased non-covered and covered past due loans as of December 31,
2014 and 2013.
Loans
30-59
Days Past
Due
Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
Loans 90
or More
Days Past
Due
Total
Loans
Past Due
Current
Loans
Total
Loans
(Dollars in Thousands)
Loans 90
Days or
More Past
Due and
Still
Accruing
As of December 31, 2014:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction &
development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Other
Total
$ 900
$ 233
$ 1,577
$ 2,710
$ 316,944
$ 319,654
$
1,382
2,859
3,953
634
-
$ 9,728
286
635
2,334
158
-
$ 3,646
3,367
7,668
6,755
366
-
$ 19,733
5,035
11,162
13,042
1,158
-
$ 33,107
156,472
896,362
443,064
29,624
14,308
$ 1,856,774
161,507
907,524
456,106
30,782
14,308
$ 1,889,881
$
-
-
-
-
1
-
1
Loans
30-59
Days Past
Due
Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
Loans 90
or More
Days Past
Due
Total
Loans
Past Due
(Dollars in Thousands)
Current
Loans
Total
Loans
Loans 90
Days or
More Past
Due and
Still
Accruing
As of December 31, 2013:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction &
development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Other
Total
$10,893
$ 272
$ 4,081
$ 15,246
$ 229,127
$ 244,373
$
1,026
3,981
5,422
568
-
$21,890
69
1,388
1,735
197
-
$ 3,661
3,935
7,751
11,587
305
-
$ 27,659
5,030
13,120
18,744
1,070
-
$ 53,210
141,341
795,203
333,142
33,179
33,252
$ 1,565,244
146,371
808,323
351,886
34,249
33,252
$ 1,618,454
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
F-34
The following table presents an analysis of purchased non-covered past due loans as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Loans
30-59
Days Past
Due
Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
Loans 90
or More
Days Past
Due
Total
Loans
Past Due
Current
Loans
Total
Loans
(Dollars in Thousands)
Loans 90
Days or
More Past
Due and
Still
Accruing
As of December 30, 2014:
Commercial, financial &
agricultural ..................................... $
Real estate – construction &
development ....................................
461 $
90 $
175 $
726 $
37,315 $
38,041 $
58,362
790
1,735
1,117
3,642
54,720
Real estate – commercial &
2,107
farmland ..........................................
Real estate – residential .......................
6,907
Consumer installment loans .................
82
Total ..................................................... $ 10,347 $
1,194
1,401
-
12,830
9,529
14,677
6,369
147
65
4,420 $ 17,255 $ 32,022 $
293,876
251,665
4,641
642,217 $
306,706
266,342
4,788
674,239 $
-
-
-
-
-
-
Loans
30-59
Days Past
Due
Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
Loans 90
or More
Days Past
Due
Total
Loans
Past Due
Current
Loans
Total
Loans
(Dollars in Thousands)
Loans 90
Days or
More Past
Due and
Still
Accruing
As of December 30, 2013:
Commercial, financial &
agricultural ..................................... $
Real estate – construction &
development ....................................
370 $
70 $
11 $
451 $
31,690 $
32,141 $
1,008
89
325
1,422
29,754
31,176
Real estate – commercial &
6,851
farmland ..........................................
Real estate – residential .......................
4,667
Consumer installment loans .................
7
Total ..................................................... $ 12,903 $
2,064
1,074
17
3,314 $
1,516
3,428
9
10,431
9,169
33
5,289 $ 21,506 $
169,467
191,682
4,654
427,247 $
179,898
200,851
4,687
448,753 $
-
-
-
-
-
-
F-35
The following table presents an analysis of covered past due loans as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Loans
30-59
Days Past
Due
Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
Loans 90
or More
Days Past
Due
Total
Loans
Past Due
Current
Loans
Total
Loans
(Dollars in Thousands)
Loans 90
Days or
More Past
Due and
Still
Accruing
As of December 30, 2014:
Commercial, financial &
agricultural ..................................... $
Real estate – construction &
development ....................................
Real estate – commercial &
farmland ..........................................
Real estate – residential .......................
Consumer installment loans .................
Total ..................................................... $
451 $
136 $
1,878 $
2,465 $
19,002 $
21,467 $
238
226
6,703
7,167
16,280
23,447
4,371
3,464
10
8,534 $
1,486
962
-
13,568
7,711
10,082
5,656
101
91
2,810 $ 22,039 $ 33,383 $
134,059
68,438
117
237,896 $
147,627
78,520
218
271,279 $
-
-
714
-
-
714
Loans
30-59
Days Past
Due
Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
Loans 90
or More
Days Past
Due
Total
Loans
Past Due
Current
Loans
Total
Loans
(Dollars in Thousands)
Loans 90
Days or
More Past
Due and
Still
Accruing
As of December 31, 2013:
Commercial, financial &
agricultural ...................................... $
Real estate – construction &
development ....................................
3,966 $
12 $
6,165 $ 10,143 $
16,407 $
26,550 $
843
144
14,055
15,042
28,137
43,179
Real estate – commercial &
8,482
farmland ..........................................
Real estate – residential .......................
7,648
Consumer installment loans .................
51
Total ..................................................... $ 20,990 $
4,350
1,914
14
39,260
26,428
19,806
10,244
370
305
6,434 $ 57,197 $ 84,621 $
185,191
75,367
514
305,616 $
224,451
95,173
884
390,237 $
-
-
346
-
-
346
Impaired Loans
Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all
amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreements. Impaired loans include loans on nonaccrual status
and accruing troubled debt restructurings. When determining if the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments
due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement, the Company considers the borrower’s capacity to pay, which
includes such factors as the borrower’s current financial statements, an analysis of global cash flow sufficient to pay all debt obligations
and an evaluation of secondary sources of repayment, such as guarantor support and collateral value. Impaired loans include loans on
nonaccrual status and troubled debt restructurings. The Company individually assesses for impairment all nonaccrual loans greater than
$200,000 and rated substandard or worse and all troubled debt restructurings greater than $100,000. If a loan is deemed impaired, a
specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows
using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Interest payments on
impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured, in which case interest
is recognized on a cash basis.
F-36
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans:
Nonaccrual loans
Troubled debt restructurings not included above
Total impaired loans
Interest income recognized on impaired loans
Foregone interest income on impaired loans
As of and For the Years Ended
December 31,
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 29,203
17,214
$ 46,417
2012
$ 38,885
18,744
$ 57,629
2014
$ 21,728
12,759
$ 34,487
$
$
1,170
155
$
$
522
418
$
$
495
718
The following table presents an analysis of information pertaining to impaired loans, excluding purchased non-covered and covered
loans as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Total
As of December 31, 2013:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Total
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 3,387
8,325
17,514
15,571
618
$ 45,415
$
6
448
4,967
3,514
-
$ 8,935
$ 1,956
4,005
9,651
9,407
533
$ 25,552
$ 1,962
4,453
14,618
12,921
533
$ 34,487
$
395
771
1,859
974
9
$ 4,008
$ 3,021
5,368
15,972
16,317
519
$ 41,197
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 6,240
11,363
18,456
24,342
623
$ 61,024
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 4,618
5,867
15,479
19,970
483
$ 46,417
$ 4,618
5,867
15,479
19,970
483
$ 46,417
$
435
512
1,443
1,472
9
$ 3,871
$ 4,844
8,341
17,559
20,335
642
$ 51,721
F-37
During 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded provision for loan loss expense of $843,000, $1.5 million and $2.6 million,
respectively, to account for losses where there was a decrease in cash flows from the initial estimates on loans acquired in FDIC-assisted
transactions. During 2014, the Company recorded provision for loan loss expense of $84,000 to account for losses where there was a
decrease in cash flows from the initial estimates on purchased, non-covered loans. The Company did not record a provision for loan
loss expense to account for losses where the initial estimate of cash flows was revised downward based on new information on purchased,
non-covered loans during 2013 and 2012. The allowance for loan losses allocated to purchased non-covered loans and covered loans
that is immediately charged off is related to the purchased credit-impaired loans. Charge-offs on purchased loans, both covered and
non-covered, are recorded when impairment is recorded. Provision expense for covered loans is recorded net of the indemnification by
the FDIC loss-share agreements.
The following is a summary of information pertaining to purchased non-covered impaired loans:
Nonaccrual loans
Troubled debt restructurings not included above
Total impaired loans
Interest income recognized on impaired loans
Foregone interest income on impaired loans
As of and For the Years Ended
December 31,
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
2014
$ 18,249
1,212
$ 19,461
$
6,659
5,938
$ 12,597
$
$
109
237
$
$
-
-
2012
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
The following table presents an analysis of information pertaining to purchased non-covered impaired loans as of December 31, 2014
and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Total
As of December 31, 2013:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Total
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
(Dollars in Thousands)
$
499
2,210
13,520
10,487
169
$ 26,885
$
175
1,436
10,588
7,191
71
$ 19,461
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
175
1,436
10,588
7,191
71
$ 19,461
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
165
1,643
7,484
7,084
68
$ 16,444
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
(Dollars in Thousands)
$
19
5,719
4,563
9,612
57
$ 19,970
$
11
3,690
2,881
5,978
37
$ 12,597
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
11
3,690
2,881
5,978
37
$ 12,597
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
-
71
55
115
1
242
F-38
The following is a summary of information pertaining to covered impaired loans:
Nonaccrual loans
Troubled debt restructurings not included above
Total impaired loans
Interest income recognized on impaired loans
Foregone interest income on impaired loans
As of and For the Years Ended
December 31,
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 69,152
22,243
$ 91,395
2012
$ 115,712
17,090
$ 132,802
2014
$ 35,412
22,619
$ 58,031
$
$
1,134
109
$
$
968
330
$
$
849
491
The following table presents an analysis of information pertaining to covered impaired loans as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Total
As of December 31, 2013:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment loans
Total
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 10,845
11,621
23,349
19,629
111
$ 65,555
$ 8,582
10,638
20,663
18,054
94
$ 58,031
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 8,582
10,638
20,663
18,054
94
$ 58,031
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 9,777
14,132
28,594
21,091
163
$ 73,757
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
Total
Recorded
Investment
Related
Allowance
Average
Recorded
Investment
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 9,680
20,915
46,612
29,089
394
$ 106,690
$ 7,270
18,037
40,749
24,998
341
$ 91,395
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 7,270
18,037
40,749
24,998
341
$ 91,395
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 8,696
21,794
51,584
28,452
304
$110,830
F-39
Credit Quality Indicators
The Company uses a nine category risk grading system to assign a risk grade to each loan in the portfolio. Following is a description of
the general characteristics of the grades:
Grade 10 – Prime Credit – This grade represents loans to the Company’s most creditworthy borrowers or loans that are secured by cash
or cash equivalents.
Grade 15 – Good Credit – This grade includes loans that exhibit one or more characteristics better than that of a Satisfactory Credit.
Generally, debt service coverage and borrower’s liquidity is materially better than required by the Company’s loan policy.
Grade 20 – Satisfactory Credit – This grade is assigned to loans to borrowers who exhibit satisfactory credit histories, contain acceptable
loan structures and demonstrate ability to repay.
Grade 23 – Performing, Under-Collateralized Credit – This grade is assigned to loans that are currently performing and supported by
adequate financial information that reflects repayment capacity, but exhibits a loan-to-value ratio greater than 110%, based on a
documented collateral valuation.
Grade 25 – Minimum Acceptable Credit – This grade includes loans which exhibit all the characteristics of a Satisfactory Credit, but
warrant more than normal level of banker supervision due to (i) circumstances which elevate the risks of performance (such as start-up
operations, untested management, heavy leverage, interim losses); (ii)adverse, extraordinary events that have affected, or could affect,
the borrower’s cash flow, financial condition, ability to continue operating profitability or refinancing (such as death of principal, fire,
divorce); (iii) loans that require more than the normal servicing requirements (such as any type of construction financing, acquisition
and development loans, accounts receivable or inventory loans and floor plan loans); (iv) existing technical exceptions which raise some
doubts about the Bank’s perfection in its collateral position or the continued financial capacity of the borrower; or (v) improvements in
formerly criticized borrowers, which may warrant banker supervision.
Grade 30 – Other Asset Especially Mentioned – This grade includes loans that exhibit potential weaknesses that deserve management’s
close attention. If left uncorrected, these weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the
Company’s credit position at some future date.
Grade 40 – Substandard – This grade represents loans which are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity
of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. These assets exhibit a well-defined weakness or are characterized by the distinct
possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. These weaknesses may be characterized by past due
performance, operating losses or questionable collateral values.
Grade 50 – Doubtful – This grade includes loans which exhibit all of the characteristics of a substandard loan with the added provision
that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly
questionable or improbable.
Grade 60 – Loss – This grade is assigned to loans which are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as
active assets of the Bank is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loss has absolutely no recovery or salvage value,
but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing it off.
F-40
The following table presents the loan portfolio, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans, by risk grade as of December 31,
2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014:
Risk Grade
10
15
20
23
25
30
40
50
60
Total
As of December 31, 2013:
Risk Grade
10
15
20
23
25
30
40
50
60
Total
Commercial,
financial &
agricultural
Real estate -
construction &
development
Real estate -
commercial &
farmland
Real estate -
residential
Consumer
installment
loans
Other
Total
$ 6,573
1,005
17,544
37
4,692
257
673
1
-
$ 30,782
$
-
-
14,308
-
-
-
-
-
-
$14,308
$ 128,577
217,804
947,948
29,205
488,187
25,983
52,176
1
-
$ 1,889,881
Consumer
installment
loans
$ 6,714
1,276
18,619
274
6,310
197
859
-
-
$ 34,249
Other
Total
$
-
-
33,252
-
-
-
-
-
-
$33,252
$
74,381
230,212
773,051
31,604
420,491
30,591
57,987
137
-
$ 1,618,454
$ 121,355
25,318
100,599
56
62,519
3,758
6,049
-
-
$ 319,654
$
268
4,010
47,541
8,933
93,514
1,474
5,767
-
-
$ 161,507
Commercial,
financial &
agricultural
Real estate -
construction &
development
$ 66,983
24,789
93,852
127
50,373
2,111
6,011
127
-
$ 244,373
$
-
4,655
45,195
8,343
78,736
2,876
6,566
-
-
$ 146,371
$
$
(Dollars in Thousands)
226
59,301
256,758
9,672
102,998
7,459
19,692
-
-
$ 456,106
155
128,170
511,198
10,507
224,464
13,035
19,995
-
-
$ 907,524
$
Real estate -
commercial &
farmland
Real estate -
residential
(Dollars in Thousands)
419
265
$
52,335
147,157
150,343
431,790
12,641
10,219
103,427
181,645
13,558
11,849
19,153
25,398
10
-
-
-
$ 351,886
$ 808,323
F-41
The following table presents the purchased non-covered loan portfolio by risk grade as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014:
Risk Grade
10
15
20
23
25
30
40
50
60
Total
As of December 31, 2013:
Risk Grade
10
15
20
23
25
30
40
50
60
Total
Commercial,
financial &
agricultural
Real estate -
construction &
development
$
6,624
1,376
13,657
73
13,753
1,618
910
30
-
$ 38,041
$
$
-
522
12,991
-
36,230
4,365
4,254
-
-
58,362
Commercial,
financial &
agricultural
Real estate -
construction &
development
$
1,865
4,606
5,172
-
19,638
576
284
-
-
$ 32,141
$
$
-
7
3,960
-
20,733
1,760
4,716
-
-
31,176
Consumer
installment
loans
$
480
501
1,647
-
1,920
41
199
-
-
$ 4,788
Consumer
installment
loans
$
451
703
1,383
-
1,888
194
68
-
-
$ 4,687
Other
Total
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
7,394
29,727
208,686
6,578
361,155
25,747
34,889
63
-
$ 674,239
Other
Total
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
2,605
34,474
88,893
-
274,442
22,962
25,377
-
-
$ 448,753
$
Real estate -
commercial &
farmland
Real estate -
residential
(Dollars in Thousands)
290
$
14,051
64,083
3,298
164,959
7,444
12,184
33
-
$ 266,342
-
13,277
116,308
3,207
144,293
12,279
17,342
-
-
$ 306,706
$
Real estate -
commercial &
farmland
Real estate -
residential
(Dollars in Thousands)
289
$
16,160
34,576
-
129,923
10,878
9,025
-
-
$ 200,851
-
12,998
43,802
-
102,260
9,554
11,284
-
-
$ 179,898
F-42
The following table presents the covered loan portfolio by risk grade as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014:
Commercial,
financial &
agricultural
Real estate -
construction &
development
$
-
-
917
164
5,181
4,808
10,397
-
-
$ 21,467
$
$
-
1
3,184
537
9,406
2,753
7,566
-
-
23,447
Commercial,
financial &
agricultural
Real estate -
construction &
development
$
-
-
2,184
134
7,508
5,125
11,599
-
-
$ 26,550
$
$
-
16
8,549
1,085
9,611
2,006
21,912
-
-
43,179
Risk Grade
10
15
20
23
25
30
40
50
60
Total
As of December 31, 2013:
Risk Grade
10
15
20
23
25
30
40
50
60
Total
Troubled Debt Restructurings
$
Real estate -
commercial &
farmland
Real estate -
residential
(Dollars in Thousands)
-
$
525
14,089
6,642
33,124
8,050
16,090
-
-
$ 78,520
-
761
23,167
11,404
80,334
5,302
26,659
-
-
$ 147,627
$
Real estate -
commercial &
farmland
Real estate -
residential
(Dollars in Thousands)
-
$
638
21,363
4,748
38,427
6,979
23,018
-
-
$ 95,173
-
1,048
34,674
17,037
101,657
21,297
48,738
-
-
$ 224,451
Consumer
installment
loans
Other
Total
$
$
-
-
77
-
37
-
104
-
-
218
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
1,287
41,434
18,747
128,082
20,913
60,816
-
-
$ 271,279
Consumer
installment
loans
Other
Total
$
$
-
-
193
51
235
17
388
-
-
884
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
-
1,702
66,963
23,055
157,438
35,424
105,655
-
-
$ 390,237
The restructuring of a loan is considered a “troubled debt restructuring” if both (i) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and
(ii) the Company has granted a concession. Concessions may include interest rate reductions to below market interest rates, principal
forgiveness, restructuring amortization schedules and other actions intended to minimize potential losses. The Company has exhibited
the greatest success for rehabilitation of the loan by a reduction in the rate alone (maintaining the amortization of the debt) or a
combination of a rate reduction and the forbearance of previously past due interest or principal. This has most typically been evidenced
in certain commercial real estate loans whereby a disruption in the borrower’s cash flow resulted in an extended past due status, of which
the borrower was unable to catch up completely as the cash flow of the property ultimately stabilized at a level lower than its original
level. A reduction in rate, coupled with a forbearance of unpaid principal and/or interest, allowed the net cash flows to service the debt
under the modified terms.
The Company’s policy requires a restructure request to be supported by a current, well-documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s
financial condition and a collateral evaluation that is no older than six months from the date of the restructure. Key factors of that
evaluation include the documentation of current, recurring cash flows, support provided by the guarantor(s) and the current valuation of
the collateral. If the appraisal in file is older than six months, an evaluation must be made as to the continued reasonableness of the
valuation. For certain income-producing properties, current rent rolls and/or other income information can be utilized to support the
appraisal valuation, when coupled with documented cap rates within our markets and a physical inspection of the collateral to validate
the current condition.
F-43
The Company’s policy states in the event a loan has been identified as a troubled debt restructuring, it should be assigned a grade of
substandard and placed on nonaccrual status until such time that the borrower has demonstrated the ability to service the loan payments
based on the restructured terms – generally defined as six months of satisfactory payment history. Missed payments under the original
loan terms are not considered under the new structure; however, subsequent missed payments are considered non-performance and are
not considered toward the six month required term of satisfactory payment history. The Company’s loan policy states that a nonaccrual
loan may be returned to accrual status when (i) none of its principal and interest is due and unpaid, and the Company expects repayment
of the remaining contractual principal and interest, or (ii) when it otherwise becomes well secured and in the process of collection.
Restoration to accrual status on any given loan must be supported by a well-documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s financial
condition and the prospects for full repayment, approved by the Company’s Chief Credit Officer.
In the normal course of business, the Company renews loans with a modification of the interest rate or terms that are not deemed as
troubled debt restructurings because the borrower is not experiencing financial difficulty. The Company modified loans in 2014 and
2013 totaling $29.1 million and $30.4 million, respectively, under such parameters. In addition, the Company offers consumer loan
customers an annual skip-a-pay program that is based on certain qualifying parameters and not based on financial difficulties. The
Company does not treat these as troubled debt restructurings.
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had a balance of $15.3 million and $20.9 million, respectively, in troubled debt
restructurings, excluding purchased non-covered and covered loans. The Company has recorded $2.2 million and $2.1 million in
previous charge-offs on such loans at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company’s balance in the allowance for loan
losses allocated to such troubled debt restructurings was $231,000 and $432,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. At
December 31, 2014, the Company did not have any commitments to lend additional funds to debtors whose terms have been modified
in troubled restructurings.
During the year ending December 31, 2014, the Company modified loans as troubled debt restructurings with principal balances of $3.1
million. These modifications impacted the Company’s allowance for loan losses by $232,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014.
The following table presents the loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the year ending December
31, 2014 and 2013.
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
December 31, 2014
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 100
264
1,082
1,309
67
$ 2,822
#
6
5
5
20
16
52
December 31, 2013
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 255
270
1,084
1,548
92
$ 3,249
#
2
5
4
18
9
38
Troubled debt restructurings with an outstanding balance of $1.2 million at December 31, 2013 defaulted during the year ended
December 31, 2014 and these defaults did not have a material impact on the Company’s allowance for loan loss. The following table
presents the troubled debt restructurings by class that defaulted during the year ending December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
December 31, 2014
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 236
33
570
314
61
$ 1,214
#
1
1
2
6
4
14
December 31, 2013
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 525
29
2,197
639
-
$ 3,390
#
3
1
3
3
-
10
F-44
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class, excluding purchased non-covered and covered
loans, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
As of December 31, 2013
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
#
6
9
19
47
11
92
#
4
8
17
37
6
72
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 290
679
6,477
5,258
55
$ 12,759
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 13
228
724
1,485
73
$ 2,523
#
2
5
3
11
11
32
Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 515
1,896
6,913
7,818
72
$ 17,214
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 525
32
2,273
834
19
$ 3,683
#
3
2
4
8
3
20
As of December 31, 2014, the Company had a balance of $1.2 million in troubled debt restructurings included in purchased non-
covered loans. The Company did not have any troubled debt restructurings included in purchased non-covered loans at December 31,
2013. The Company has recorded $29,000 in charge-offs on such loans at December 31, 2014. At December 31, 2014, the Company
did not have any commitments to lend additional funds to debtors whose terms have been modified in troubled restructurings.
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class of purchased non-covered loans, classified
separately as accrual and non-accrual at December 31, 2014.
As of December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
#
-
1
1
6
1
9
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
317
346
547
2
$ 1,212
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
-
-
25
-
$ 25
#
-
-
-
1
-
1
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had a balance of $24.6 million and $27.3 million, respectively, in troubled debt
restructurings included in covered loans. The Company has recorded $1.8 million and $1.6 million in previous charge-offs on such
loans at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. At December 31, 2014, the Company did not have any commitments to lend
additional funds to debtors whose terms have been modified in troubled restructurings.
F-45
The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class of covered loans, classified separately as accrual
and non-accrual at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
As of December 31, 2014
Accruing Loans
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
As of December 31, 2013
Loan class:
Commercial, financial & agricultural
Real estate – construction & development
Real estate – commercial & farmland
Real estate – residential
Consumer installment
Total
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 40
3,037
8,079
11,460
3
$ 22,619
Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 13
3,256
7,255
11,719
-
$ 22,243
#
2
4
14
96
1
117
#
1
3
13
83
-
100
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ -
29
1,082
831
-
$ 1,942
Non-Accruing Loans
Balance
(in thousands)
$ 71
52
3,946
942
10
$ 5,021
#
2
2
5
8
-
17
#
5
4
5
8
2
24
Related Party Loans and Deposits
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has granted loans to certain directors and their affiliates. Company policy prohibits
loans to executive officers. Changes in related party loans are summarized as follows:
Balance, beginning of year
Advances
Repayments
Transactions due to changes in related parties
Balance, end of year
December 31,
2014
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 5,565
78
(1,240)
-
$ 4,403
$ 1,392
813
(923)
4,283
$ 5,565
Deposits from principal officers, directors, and their affiliates at December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $6,018,000 and $5,994,000,
respectively.
F-46
Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the periods indicated. Allocation of a portion
of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.
Commercial,
financial &
agricultural
Real estate –
construction &
development
Real estate –
commercial &
farmland
Real estate -
residential
Consumer
installment
loans and
Other
Purchased
non-covered
loans
Covered
loans
Total
Twelve months ended December 31, 2014:
Balance, January 1, 2014 ........... $
Provision for loan losses ..............
Loans charged off.........................
Recoveries of loans previously
1,823 $
1,427
(1,567)
(Dollars in Thousands)
5,538 $
(265 )
(592 )
8,393 $
3,444
(3,288 )
6,034 $
(452)
(1,707 )
589 $
567
(471)
charged off .............................
321
349
274
254
486
- $
84
(84)
-
$
-
843
(1,851)
1,008
22,377
5,648
(9,560)
2,692
Balance, December 31, 2014 ...... $
2,004 $
5,030 $
8,823 $
4,129 $
1,171 $
- $
-
$
21,157
Period-end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for
impairment ............................. $
Loans collectively evaluated for
impairment .............................
375 $
743 $
1,861 $
911 $
- $
1,629
4,287
6,962
3,218
1,171
Ending balance ........................... $
2,004 $
5,030 $
8,823 $
4,129 $
1,171 $
-
-
-
$
$
-
$
3,890
-
-
$
17,267
21,157
Loans:
Individually evaluated for
impairment ............................. $
490 $
3,709 $
14,546 $
8,904 $
- $
-
$
-
$
27,649
Collectively evaluated for
impairment .............................
Acquired with deteriorated credit
quality ....................................
319,164
157,798
892,978
447,202
45,090
579,172
122,248
2,563,652
-
-
-
-
-
95,067
149,031
244,098
Ending balance ........................... $
319,654
$
161,507 $
907,524 $
456,106 $
45,090 $
674,239
$ 271,279
$
2,835,399
Commercial,
financial &
agricultural
Real estate –
construction &
development
Real estate –
commercial &
farmland
Real estate -
residential
Consumer
installment
loans and
Other
Purchased
non-covered
loans
Covered
loans
Total
Twelve months ended December 31, 2013:
Balance, January 1, 2013 ........... $
Provision for loan losses ..............
Loans charged off.........................
Recoveries of loans previously
2,439 $
711
(1,759)
(Dollars in Thousands)
5,343 $
1,742
(2,020 )
9,157 $
2,777
(3,571 )
5,898 $
4,463
(5,215 )
756 $
254
(719)
charged off .............................
432
473
30
888
298
Balance, December 31, 2013 ...... $
1,823 $
5,538 $
8,393 $
6,034 $
589 $
- $
-
-
-
- $
$
-
1,539
(1,539)
23,593
11,486
(14,823)
2,121
-
-
$
22,377
Period-end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for
impairment ............................. $
Loans collectively evaluated for
impairment .............................
356 $
407 $
1,427 $
1,395 $
- $
1,467
5,131
6,966
4,639
589
Ending balance ........................... $
1,823 $
5,538 $
8,393 $
6,034 $
589 $
-
-
-
$
$
-
$
3,585
-
-
$
18,792
22,377
Loans:
Individually evaluated for
impairment ............................. $
3,457 $
3,581 $
15,240 $
16,925 $
- $
-
$
-
$
39,203
Collectively evaluated for
impairment .............................
Acquired with deteriorated credit
quality ....................................
240,916
142,790
793,083
349,957
52,505
381,588
173,190
2,134,029
-
-
-
-
-
67,165
217,047
284,212
Ending balance ........................... $
244,373
$
146,371 $
808,323 $
366,882 $
52,505 $
448,753
$ 390,237
$
2,457,444
F-47
Commercial,
financial &
agricultural
Real estate –
construction &
development
Real estate –
commercial &
farmland
Real estate -
residential
Consumer
installment
loans and
Other
Purchased
non-covered
loans
Covered
loans
Total
$
-
2,638
(2,638)
35,156
31,089
(43,801)
1,149
-
-
$
23,593
$
$
$
-
$
4,554
-
-
$
19,039
23,593
-
$
45,320
224,975
282,737
1,630,290
282,737
$ 507,712
$
1,958,347
Twelve months ended December 31, 2012:
Balance, January 1, 2012 ........... $
Provision for loan losses ..............
Loans charged off.........................
Recoveries of loans previously
2,918 $
815
(1,451)
charged off .............................
157
9,438 $
5,245
(9,380 )
14,226 $
15,000
(20,551 )
8,128 $
6,267
(8,722 )
446 $
1,124
(1,059)
40
482
225
245
Balance, December 31, 2012 ...... $
2,439 $
5,343 $
9,157 $
5,898 $
756 $
(Dollars in Thousands)
Period-end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for
impairment ............................. $
Loans collectively evaluated for
impairment .............................
659 $
611 $
2,228 $
1,056 $
- $
1,780
4,732
6,929
4,842
756
Ending balance ........................... $
2,439 $
5,343 $
9,157 $
5,898 $
756 $
Loans:
Individually evaluated for
impairment ............................. $
3,351 $
7,617 $
21,332 $
13,020 $
- $
Collectively evaluated for
impairment .............................
Acquired with deteriorated credit
quality ....................................
170,866
106,582
710,990
333,460
83,417
-
-
-
-
-
Ending balance ........................... $
174,217
$
114,199 $
732,322 $
346,480 $
83,417 $
- $
-
-
-
- $
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
F-48
NOTE 6. OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED
The following is a summary of the activity in other real estate owned during years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance, January 1 ........................................................................ $
Loans transferred to other real estate owned ................................
Net gains (losses) on sale and write-downs ..................................
Sales proceeds ...............................................................................
Ending balance .............................................................................. $
2014
33,351
11,972
(4,585)
(7,578)
33,160
2013
39,850
9,137
(5,883)
(9,753)
33,351
$
$
The following is a summary of the activity in purchased, non-covered other real estate owned during years ended December 31, 2014
and 2013:
(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance, January 1 ........................................................................ $
Loans transferred to other real estate owned ................................
Acquired in acquisitions ...............................................................
Transfer from covered other real estate owned due to loss share
expiration .................................................................................
Net gains (losses) on sale and write-downs ..................................
Sales proceeds ...............................................................................
Ending balance .............................................................................. $
2014
4,276
4,160
8,864
1,226
828
(3,769)
15,585
2013
-
-
5,623
-
-
(1,347)
4,276
$
$
The following is a summary of the activity in covered other real estate owned during years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance, January 1 ........................................................................ $
Loans transferred to other real estate owned ................................
Transfer to purchased, non-covered other real estate owned due
to loss share expiration .............................................................
Net gains (losses) on sale and write-downs ..................................
Sales proceeds ...............................................................................
Ending balance .............................................................................. $
2014
45,893
13,650
(1,226)
(5,965)
(32,445)
19,907
2013
88,273
31,833
-
(16,395)
(57,818)
45,893
$
$
F-49
NOTE 7. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:
Land
Buildings
Furniture and equipment
Construction in progress
Accumulated depreciation
December 31,
2014
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 31,709
79,692
41,472
971
153,844
(56,593)
$ 97,251
$ 36,481
69,461
32,705
2,415
141,062
(37,874)
$ 103,188
Estimated costs to complete construction projects in progress were less than $1 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013. Depreciation
expense was approximately $6.6 million, $4.8 million and $5.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012,
respectively.
Leases
The Company has various operating leases with unrelated parties on 16 banking offices and seven mortgage offices. Generally, these
leases are on smaller locations with initial lease terms under ten years with up to two renewal options.
Rental expense amounted to approximately $2,189,000, $1,777,000 and $1,708,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and
2012, respectively. Future minimum lease commitments under the Company’s operating leases, excluding any renewal options, are
summarized as follows:
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter
$ 1,629,855
1,464,571
1,211,124
903,479
666,924
485,021
$ 6,360,974
F-50
NOTE 8. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company recorded $27,437,000 of goodwill on the Coastal acquisition during 2014 and the Company recorded $35,153,000 of
goodwill on the Prosperity acquisition in 2013. Impairment exists when a reporting unit’s carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair
value. At December 31, 2014, the Company’s reporting unit had positive equity and the Company elected to perform a qualitative
assessment to determine if it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, including
goodwill. The qualitative assessment indicated that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its
carrying value, resulting in no impairment.
The Company recorded a core deposit intangible asset of $4,542,000 associated with the acquisition of Coastal during 2014, recorded a
core deposit intangible asset of $4,383,000 associated with the acquisition of Prosperity during 2013 and recorded a core deposit
intangible of $1,149,000 associated with the acquisitions of CBG and MBT during 2012. The amortization period used for core deposit
intangibles ranges from three to 10 years. Following is a summary of information related to acquired intangible assets:
As of December 31, 2014
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization
Amount
As of December 31, 2013
Gross
Accumulated
Amortization
Amount
(Dollars in Thousands)
Amortized intangible assets - core deposit premiums
$ 26,749
$ 18,528
$ 22,207
$ 16,198
The aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets was approximately $2,330,000, $1,414,000 and $1,359,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter
$ 2,325
1,333
1,275
1,275
1,275
738
$ 8,221
NOTE 9. LOAN SERVICING RIGHTS
The following is a summary of the activity for loan servicing rights during years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance, January 1 ........................................................................ $
Additions ......................................................................................
Disposals .......................................................................................
Acquired in acquisitions ...............................................................
Amortized to expense ...................................................................
Ending balance .............................................................................. $
2014
378
589
-
-
(115)
852
2013
-
274
-
113
(9)
378
$
$
The fair value of servicing rights was $1,134,000 and $614,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Fair value at December
31, 2014 was determined using discount rates ranging from 9.5% to 12.0%, prepayment speeds ranging from 11.1% to 24.7%,
depending on the stratification of the specific right, and a weighted average default rate of 0.7%. Fair value at December 31, 2013
was determined using discount rates ranging from 10.5% to 13.0%, prepayment speeds ranging from 8.5% to 24.7%, depending on the
stratification of the specific right, and a weighted average default rate of 2.62%.
F-51
NOTE 10. DEPOSITS
The aggregate amount of time deposits in denominations of $250,000 or more at December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $135.1 million and
$121.2 million, respectively. The scheduled maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2014 are as follows:
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
(Dollars in
Thousands)
$ 641,103
83,720
35,239
12,609
7,539
79
$ 780,289
The Company did not have any brokered deposits at December 31, 2014. The Company had brokered deposits of approximately $6.0
million at December 31, 2013.
NOTE 11. SECURITIES SOLD UNDER REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
Securities sold under repurchase agreements, which are secured borrowings, generally mature within one to four days from the
transaction date. Securities sold under repurchase agreements are reflected at the amount of cash received in connection with the
transactions. The Company may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. The
Company monitors the fair value of the underlying securities on a daily basis. Securities sold under repurchase agreements at
December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $73.3 million and $83.5 million, respectively.
The following is a summary of securities sold under repurchase agreements for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
Average daily balance during the year
Average interest rate during the year
Maximum month-end balance during the year
Weighted average interest rate at year-end
As of and For the Years Ended
December 31,
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 26,908
0.54%
$ 83,516
0.57%
2012
$ 26,563
0.58%
$ 50,120
0.44%
2014
$ 47,136
0.35%
$ 73,310
0.31%
NOTE 12. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has established a retirement plan for eligible employees. The Ameris Bancorp 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan allows a
participant to defer a portion of his compensation and provides that the Company will match a portion of the deferred compensation. The
Plan also provides for non-elective and discretionary contributions. All full-time and part-time employees are eligible to participate in
the Plan provided they have met the eligibility requirements. Generally, a participant must have completed 12 months of employment
with a minimum of 1,000 hours and have attained an age of 21.
The aggregate expense under the plan charged to operations during 2014, 2013 and 2012 amounted to $1,160,000, $839,000 and
$571,000, respectively.
NOTE 13. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company and the Bank have entered into separate deferred compensation arrangements and supplemental executive retirement
plans with certain executive officers and directors. The plans call for certain amounts payable at retirement, death or disability. The
estimated present value of the deferred compensation is being accrued over the expected service period. The Company and the Bank
have purchased life insurance policies which they intend to use to fund these liabilities. The cash surrender value of the life insurance
was $58.9 million and $49.4 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Accrued deferred compensation of $655,000 and
$722,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, is included in other liabilities. Accrued supplemental executive retirement plan
liabilities of $1,594,000 and $851,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, is included in other liabilities. Aggregate
compensation expense under the plans was $743,000, $601,000 and $364,000 per year for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which is
included in salaries and employee benefits.
F-52
NOTE 14. OTHER BORROWINGS
Other borrowings consist of the following:
December 31,
2014
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
Daily Rate Credit from Federal Home Loan Bank with a fixed interest rate of 0.36%.
Advance from Federal Home Loan Bank with a fixed interest rate of 0.17%, due
January 24, 2014.
$
35,000
$
-
-
165,000
Advances under revolving credit agreement with a regional bank with interest at 90-
day LIBOR plus 3.50% (3.73% at December 31, 2014) due in August 2016,
secured by subsidiary bank stock.
Advances under revolving credit agreement with a regional bank with interest at 90-
day LIBOR plus 4.00% (4.24% at December 31, 2013) due in August 2016,
secured by subsidiary bank stock.
Advance from correspondent bank with a fixed interest rate of 4.50%, due November
27, 2017, secured by subsidiary bank loan receivable.
Subordinated debt issued by Prosperity Bank due June 2016 with an interest rate of
90-day LIBOR plus 1.60% (1.84% at December 31, 2013).
Subordinated debt issued by The Prosperity Banking Company due September 2016
with an interest rate of 90-day LIBOR plus 1.75% (1.99% at December 31, 2014).
24,000
-
-
10,000
4,881
-
-
5,000
15,000
78,881
$
14,572
$194,572
The contractual balance of the subordinated debt issued by The Prosperity Banking Company is $15.0 million. The debt was recorded
at a discount at acquisition, and that discount has been fully accreted by December 31, 2014.
The advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) are collateralized by a blanket lien on all first mortgage loans and other
specific loans in addition to FHLB stock. At December 31, 2014, $221.5 million was available for borrowing on lines with the FHLB.
At December 31, 2014, $16.0 million was available for borrowing under the revolving credit agreement with a regional bank, secured
by subsidiary bank stock.
As of December 31, 2014, the Company maintained credit arrangements with various financial institutions to purchase federal funds up
to $50 million.
The Company also participates in the Federal Reserve discount window borrowings. At December 31, 2014, the Company had $621.5
million of loans pledged at the Federal Reserve discount window and had $442.8 million available for borrowing.
NOTE 15. PREFERRED STOCK
On November 21, 2008, Ameris sold 52,000 shares of preferred stock with a warrant to purchase 679,443 shares of the Company’s
common stock to the U.S. Treasury under the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program. The proceeds from the sale of $52 million were
allocated between the preferred stock and the warrant based on their relative fair values at the time of the sale. Of the $52 million in
proceeds, $48.98 million was allocated to the preferred stock and $3.02 million was allocated to the warrant. The discount recorded on
the preferred stock that resulted from allocating a portion of the proceeds to the warrant is being accreted as a portion of the preferred
stock dividends in the consolidated statements of income to arrive at net income (loss) available to common shareholders.
The preferred stock qualifies as Tier I capital and will pay cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years and
9% per annum thereafter. The preferred stock is redeemable at any time at $1,000 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends with
the consent of the Company’s primary federal regulator.
On June 14, 2012, the preferred stock was sold by the Treasury through a registered public offering. The sale of the preferred stock to
new investors did not result in any accounting entries and does not change the Company’s capital position. On August 22, 2012, the
Company repurchased the warrant from the Treasury for $2.67 million. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company repurchased
24,000 shares of the outstanding preferred stock at par, leaving 28,000 shares of preferred stock outstanding at December 31, 2013.
During the first quarter of 2014, the Company repurchased the remaining 28,000 shares of the outstanding preferred stock at par.
F-53
NOTE 16. INCOME TAXES
The income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income consists of the following:
2014
For the Years Ended December 31,
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
2012
Current – federal
Current - state
Deferred - federal
$ 10,499
467
6,516
17,482
$
$ 5,237
505
3,543
$ 9,285
$ 4,732
28
2,525
$ 7,285
The Company’s income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the federal income tax statutory rates to income
before income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences is as follows:
Tax at federal income tax rate
Change resulting from:
Tax-exempt interest
Increase in cash value of bank owned life insurance
Other
Provision for income taxes
2014
For the Years Ended December 31,
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 10,256
2012
$ 7,602
$ 19,672
(1,647)
(568)
25
$ 17,482
(841)
(446)
316
$ 9,285
(675)
(34)
392
$ 7,285
Net deferred income tax assets of $17,784,000 and $16,451,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, are included in other
assets. The components of deferred income taxes are as follows:
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses
Deferred compensation
Deferred gain on interest rate swap
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap
Unrealized loss on securities available for sale
Nonaccrual interest
Purchase accounting adjustments
Other real estate owned
Net operating loss tax carryforward
Capitalized costs, accrued expenses and other
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation and amortization
Intangible assets
Purchase accounting adjustments
Deferred gain on FDIC-assisted transactions
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale
Net deferred tax asset
December 31,
2014
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 7,405
787
477
460
-
153
12,380
7,706
12,146
871
42,385
4,821
802
7,159
8,809
3,010
24,601
$ 17,784
$ 7,832
550
573
130
911
323
20,334
1,855
6,074
1,976
40,558
4,355
-
7,534
12,218
-
24,107
$ 16,451
At December 31, 2014, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $34.7 million which expire at
various dates from 2029 to 2033. At December 31, 2013, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$17.4 million which expire at various dates from 2029 to 2032. Deferred tax assets are recognized for net operating losses because the
benefit is more likely than not to be realized.
F-54
The Company did not record any interest and penalties related to income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012,
and the Company did not have any amount accrued for interest and penalties at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of the various states. The Company is no
longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2011.
NOTE 17. SUBORDINATED DEFERRABLE INTEREST DEBENTURES
During 2005, the Company acquired First National Banc Statutory Trust I, a statutory trust subsidiary of First National Banc, Inc., whose
sole purpose was to issue $5,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR
plus 2.80% (3.03% at December 31, 2014) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities have a
maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in April 2009. There
are certain circumstances (as described in the trust agreement) in which the securities may be redeemed within the first five years at the
Company’s option. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2014, was
$5,000,000. The aggregate principal amount of debentures outstanding was $5,155,000. The Company’s investment in the common
stock of the trust was $155,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2006, the Company formed Ameris Statutory Trust I, issuing trust preferred certificates in the aggregate principal amount of
$36,000,000. The related debentures issued by the Company were in the aggregate principal amount of $37,114,000. Both the trust
preferred securities and the related debentures bear interest at 3-Month LIBOR plus 1.63% (1.87% at December 31, 2014). Distributions
on the trust preferred securities are paid quarterly, with interest on the debentures being paid on the corresponding dates. The trust
preferred securities mature on December 15, 2036 and are redeemable at the Company’s option beginning September 15, 2011. The
Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $1,114,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2013, the Company acquired Prosperity Banking Capital Trust I, a statutory trust subsidiary of Prosperity, whose sole purpose
was to issue $5,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus
2.57% (2.80% at December 31, 2014) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities have a
maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in July 2009. The
aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2014, was $5,000,000. The aggregate principal
amount of debentures outstanding was $5,155,000, and is being carried at fair value of $3,158,000 on the Company’s balance sheet.
The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $155,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2013, the Company acquired Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust subsidiary of Prosperity, whose sole purpose
was to issue $4,500,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus
3.15% (3.40% at December 31, 2014) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities have a
maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in March 2008. The
aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2014, was $4,500,000. The aggregate principal
amount of debentures outstanding was $4,640,000, and is being carried at fair value of $3,196,000 on the Company’s balance sheet.
The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $140,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2013, the Company acquired Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust III, a statutory trust subsidiary of Prosperity, whose sole purpose
was to issue $10,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus
1.60% (1.84% at December 31, 2014) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities have a
maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in March 2011. The
aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2014, was $10,000,000. The aggregate principal
amount of debentures outstanding was $10,310,000, and is being carried at fair value of $4,977,000 on the Company’s balance sheet.
The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $310,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2013, the Company acquired Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust IV, a statutory trust subsidiary of Prosperity, whose sole purpose
was to issue $10,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus
1.54% (1.78% at December 31, 2014) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities have a
maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in December
2012. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2014, was $10,000,000. The aggregate
principal amount of debentures outstanding was $10,310,000, and is being carried at fair value of $2,515,000 on the Company’s balance
sheet. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $310,000 and is included in other assets.
During 2014, the Company acquired Coastal Bankshares Statutory Trust I, a statutory trust subsidiary of Coastal, whose sole purpose
was to issue $5,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus
3.15% (3.38% at December 31, 2014) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities have a
maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in October 2008. The
aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2014, was $5,000,000. The aggregate principal
amount of debentures outstanding was $10,310,000, and is being carried at fair value of $3,704,000 on the Company’s balance sheet.
The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $155,000 and is included in other assets.
F-55
During 2014, the Company acquired Coastal Bankshares Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust subsidiary of Coastal, whose sole purpose
was to issue $10,000,000 principal amount of trust preferred securities at a rate per annum equal to the 3-Month LIBOR plus
1.60% (1.84% at December 31, 2014) through a pool sponsored by a national brokerage firm. The trust preferred securities have a
maturity of 30 years and are redeemable at the Company’s option on any quarterly interest payment date beginning in December
2010. The aggregate principal amount of trust preferred certificates outstanding at December 31, 2014, was $10,000,000. The aggregate
principal amount of debentures outstanding was $10,310,000, and is being carried at fair value of $5,507,000 on the Company’s balance
sheet. The Company’s investment in the common stock of the trust was $310,000 and is included in other assets.
Under applicable accounting standards, the assets and liabilities of such trusts, as well as the related income and expenses, are excluded
from the Company’s consolidated financial statements. However, the subordinated debentures issued by the Company and purchased
by the trusts remain on the consolidated balance sheets. In addition, the related interest expense continues to be included in the
consolidated statements of income. For regulatory capital purposes, the trust preferred securities qualify as a component of Tier 1 Capital.
NOTE 18. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company awards its employees and directors various forms of stock-based incentives under certain plans approved by its
shareholders. Awards granted under the plans may be in the form of qualified or nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, stock
appreciation rights (“SARs”), long-term incentive compensation units consisting of cash and common stock, or any combination thereof
within the limitations set forth in the plans. The plans provide that the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock
which may be subject to award may not exceed 2,985,000 subject to adjustment in certain circumstances to prevent dilution. At
December 31, 2014, there were 1,191,000 shares available to be issued under the plans.
All stock options have an exercise price that is equal to the closing fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date the options
were granted. Options granted under the plans generally vest over a five-year period and have a 10-year maximum term. Most options
granted since 2005 contain performance-based vesting conditions.
The Company did not grant any options during 2014, 2013 and 2012. As of December 31, 2014, there was no unrecognized compensation
cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted related to performance or non-performance based options.
As of December 31, 2014, the Company has 323,151 outstanding restricted shares granted under the plans as compensation to certain
employees. These shares carry dividend and voting rights. Sales of these shares are restricted prior to the date of vesting, which is three
to five years from the date of the grant. Shares issued under the plans are recorded at their fair market value on the date of their grant. The
compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the related vesting period. In 2014, 2013 and 2012, compensation
expense related to these grants was approximately $2,058,000, $1,041,000 and $947,000, respectively. The total income tax benefit
related to these grants was approximately $861,000, $152,000 and $170,000 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
It is the Company’s policy to issue new shares for stock option exercises and restricted stock rather than issue treasury shares. The
Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the options’ related vesting term. The Company
did not record any stock-based compensation expense related to stock options during 2014 and 2013. Stock-based compensation expense
related to stock options was approximately $97,000 for 2012. The total income tax benefit related to stock options was approximately
$49,000 and $1,000 in 2014 and 2012, respectively. There was no income tax benefit related to stock options in 2013.
The fair value of each stock-based compensation grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
There were no stock-based compensation grants made in 2014, 2013 and 2012.
F-56
A summary of the activity of non-performance based and performance based options as of December 31, 2014 is presented below:
Non-Performance Based
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Term
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Shares
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$ (000)
Shares
Performance Based
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$ (000)
Under option,
beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Under option, end of
year
Exercisable at end of
year
115,459
-
$ 17.24
-
(25,395)
(1,953)
14.81
14.88
88,111
$ 18.00
88,111
$ 18.00
371,000
-
$ 16.76
-
$
148
(6,477)
(5,192)
11.05
25.51
$
72
2.71
2.71
$
$
884
359,331
$ 16.74
2.11
$ 2,955
884
341,030
$ 17.23
2.00
$ 2,629
A summary of the activity of non-performance based and performance based options as of December 31, 2013 is presented below:
Non-Performance Based
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Term
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Shares
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$ (000)
Shares
Performance Based
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$ (000)
Under option,
beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Under option, end of
year
Exercisable at end of
year
148,498
-
$ 16.37
-
(27,657)
(5,382)
13.29
13.43
115,459
$ 17.24
115,459
$ 17.24
391,321
-
$ 16.43
-
$
107
(4,524)
(15,797)
7.47
13.22
$
42
3.04
3.04
$
$
641
371,000
$ 16.76
3.12
$ 1,401
641
351,856
$ 17.27
3.01
$ 1,145
A summary of the activity of non-performance based and performance based options as of December 31, 2012 is presented below:
Non-Performance Based
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Term
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Shares
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$ (000)
Shares
Performance Based
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Term
Under option,
beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Under option, end of
year
Exercisable at end of
year
187,032
-
$ 15.32
-
-
(38,534)
-
11.28
148,498
$ 16.37
148,498
$ 16.37
393,891
-
$ 16.45
-
$
$
$
3.34
3.34
-
-
(2,570)
-
19.67
1
391,321
$ 16.43
1
369,766
$ 17.05
F-57
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$ (000)
$
-
4.16
4.05
$
$
774
435
A summary of the status of the Company’s restricted stock awards as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is
presented below:
2014
2013
2012
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Shares
Nonvested shares at beginning of year
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested shares at end of year
377,725
82,047
(126,050)
(10,571)
323,151
$ 11.78
20.99
13.12
15.61
13.46
295,075
108,400
(21,750)
(4,000)
377,725
$ 10.47
14.77
9.31
9.88
11.78
301,775
62,450
(68,650 )
(500 )
295,075
$ 9.14
13.15
7.06
9.96
10.47
The balance of unearned compensation related to restricted stock grants as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was approximately
$1,568,000, $2,129,000 and $1,608,000, respectively. At December 31, 2014, the cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-
average period of 2.0 years.
F-58
NOTE 19. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
During 2010, the Company entered into an interest rate swap to lock in a fixed rate as opposed to the contractual variable interest rate
on the junior subordinated debentures. The interest rate swap contract has a notional amount of $37.1 million and is hedging the variable
rate on the junior subordinated debentures described in Note 17 of the consolidated financial statements. The Company receives a
variable rate of the 90-day LIBOR rate plus 1.63% and pays a fixed rate of 4.11%. The swap matures in September 2020.
These contracts are classified as cash flow hedges of an exposure to changes in the cash flow of a recognized asset. At December 31,
2014 and 2013, the fair value of the remaining instrument totaled a liability of $1,315,000 and $370,000, respectively. As a cash flow
hedge, the change in fair value of a hedge that is deemed to be highly effective is recognized in other comprehensive income and the
portion deemed to be ineffective is recognized in earnings. As of December 31, 2014, the hedge is deemed to be highly effective.
Mortgage Banking Derivatives
During 2012, the Company began maintaining a risk management program to manage interest rate risk and pricing risk associated with
its mortgage lending activities. This program includes the use of forward contracts and other derivatives that are used to offset changes
in value of the mortgage inventory due to changes in market interest rates. As a normal part of its operations, the Company enters into
derivative contracts such as forward sale commitments and IRLCs to economically hedge risks associated with overall price risk related
to IRLCs and mortgage loans held for sale carried at fair value. These mortgage banking derivatives are not designated in hedge
relationships. At December 31, 2014, the Company had approximately $38.9 million of IRLCs and $46.5 million of forward
commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans. The fair value of these mortgage banking derivatives was reflected
as a derivative asset of $1.8 million and a derivative liability of $249,000. At December 31, 2013, the Company had approximately
$35.0 million of IRLCs and $31.3 million of forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans. The fair value
of these mortgage banking derivatives was reflected as derivative assets of $1.1 million and $98,000, respectively. Fair values were
estimated based on changes in mortgage interest rates from the date of the commitments. Changes in the fair values of these mortgage-
banking derivatives are included in net gains on sales of loans.
The net gains (losses) relating to free-standing derivative instruments used for risk management are summarized below as of December
31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:
Forward contracts related to
mortgage loans held for sale ..........
Interest rate lock commitments ..........
Mortgage banking activity
Mortgage banking activity
$
$
(249 ) $
1,757 $
98 $
1,082 $
(37)
1,162
Location
December 31,
2014
December 31,
2013
December 31,
2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
The following table reflects the amount and market value of mortgage banking derivatives included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Included in other assets:
Forward contracts related to mortgage loans held for
sale .......................................................................
Interest rate lock commitments .................................
Total included in other assets
Included in other liabilities:
Forward contracts related to mortgage loans held for
sale .......................................................................
Interest rate lock commitments .................................
Total included in other liabilities
2014
2013
Notional
Amount
Fair Value
(Dollars in Thousands)
Notional
Amount
Fair Value
-
$
38,868
$ 38,868
$
-
1,757
$ 1,757
$31,250
35,035
$66,285
$
98
1,082
$ 1,180
$ 46,500
-
$ 46,500
$
$
249
-
249
$
$
-
-
-
$
$
-
-
-
F-59
NOTE 20. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Loan Commitments
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs
of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. They involve, to varying
degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same
credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. A summary of the
Company’s commitments is as follows:
Commitments to extend credit
Unused lines of credit
Financial standby letters of credit
Mortgage interest rate lock commitments
December 31,
2013
2014
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 293,517
$ 215,995
49,567
41,200
9,683
7,665
38,868
35,035
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the
contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many
of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future
cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on
management’s credit evaluation of the customer.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third
party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing
letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Collateral is required in instances which the
Company deems necessary. The Company has not been required to perform on any material financial standby letters of credit and the
Company has not incurred any losses on financial standby letters of credit for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Contingencies
Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will
only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company’s management and its legal counsel assess such
contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal
proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company’s legal counsel
evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief
sought or expected to be sought therein.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can
be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a
potentially material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature
of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the nature of the
guarantee would be disclosed.
A former borrower of the Company has filed a claim related to a loan previously made by the Company asserting lender liability. The
case was tried without a jury and an order was issued by the court against the Company awarding the borrower approximately $2.9
million. The order is currently on appeal to the South Carolina Court of Appeals and the Company is asserting it had no fiduciary
responsibility to the borrower. As of December 31, 2014, the Company believes that it has valid bases in law and fact to overturn on
appeal the verdict. As a result, the Company believes that the likelihood that the amount of the judgment will be affirmed is not probable,
and, accordingly, that the amount of any loss cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Because the Company believes that this
potential loss is not probable or estimable, it has not recorded any reserves or contingencies related to this legal matter. In the event that
the Company's assumptions used to evaluate this matter as neither probable nor estimable change in future periods, it may be required
to record a liability for an adverse outcome.
F-60
NOTE 21. REGULATORY MATTERS
The Bank is subject to certain restrictions on the amount of dividends that may be declared without prior regulatory approval. At
December 31, 2014, $21.4 million of retained earnings were available for dividend declaration without regulatory approval.
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure
to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that,
if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines
and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting
practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk
weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum
amounts and ratios of total and Tier I capital, as defined by the regulations, to risk-weighted assets, as defined, and of Tier I capital to
average assets, as defined. Management believes that, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company and the Bank met all capital
adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the most recent notification from the regulatory authorities categorized the Bank as well capitalized
under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum
total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. There are no conditions or events since
that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to
bank holding companies.
The Company’s and Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table.
As of December 31, 2014
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
Tier I Capital to Average Assets:
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
As of December 31, 2013
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
Tier I Capital to Average Assets:
Consolidated
Ameris Bank
Actual
Amount
Ratio
For Capital
Adequacy
Purposes
Amount
(Dollars in Thousands)
Ratio
To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
Amount
Ratio
$ 373,310
$ 414,356
13.42%
14.90%
$ 222,557
$ 222,528
8.00%
8.00%
$ 278,160
$ 352,153
$ 393,199
12.66%
14.14%
$ 111,279
$ 111,264
4.00%
4.00%
$ 166,896
$ 352,153
$ 393,199
8.94%
10.01%
$ 157,574
$ 157,165
4.00%
4.00%
$ 196,456
$ 353,777
$ 369,387
15.32%
16.03%
$ 184,784
$ 184,349
8.00%
8.00%
$ 230,437
$ 331,400
$ 347,010
14.35%
15.06%
$ 92,392
$ 92,175
4.00%
4.00%
$ 138,262
$ 331,400
$ 347,010
11.33%
11.93%
$ 117,025
$ 116,372
4.00%
4.00%
$ 145,465
—N/A—
10.00%
—N/A—
6.00%
—N/A—
5.00%
—N/A—
10.00%
—N/A—
6.00%
—N/A—
5.00%
F-61
NOTE 22. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced
liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market
prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based on
discounted cash flows or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the
discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement
of the instrument. The accounting standard for disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments excludes certain financial
instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented
may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.
The Company has elected to record mortgage loans held-for-sale at fair value in order to eliminate the complexities and inherent
difficulties of achieving hedge accounting and to better align reported results with the underlying economic changes in value of the
loans and related hedge instruments. This election impacts the timing and recognition of origination fees and costs, as well as servicing
value, which are now recognized in earnings at the time of origination. Interest income on mortgage loans held-for-sale is recorded on
an accrual basis in the consolidated statement of earnings and comprehensive income under the heading “Interest income – interest and
fees on loans”. The servicing value is included in the fair value of the IRLCs with borrowers. The mark to market adjustments related
to loans held-for-sale and the associated economic hedges are captured in mortgage banking activities. Net gains of $4.3 million, $1.7
million and $775,000 resulting from fair value changes of these mortgage loans were recorded in income during the years ended
December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The amount does not reflect changes in fair values of related derivative instruments
used to hedge exposure to market-related risks associated with these mortgage loans. The change in fair value of both mortgage loans
held for sale and the related derivative instruments are recorded in “Mortgage banking activity” in the Consolidated Statements of
Earnings and Comprehensive Income. The Company’s valuation of mortgage loans held for sale incorporates an assumption for credit
risk; however, given the short-term period that the Company holds these loans, valuation adjustments attributable to instrument-specific
credit risk is nominal. Interest income on mortgage loans held for sale measured at fair value is accrued as it is earned based on
contractual rates and is reflected in loan interest income on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Income.
The following table summarizes the difference between the fair value and the principal balance for mortgage loans held for sale measured
at fair value as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:
December 31,
Aggregate Fair Value of Mortgage Loans held for sale
Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance
Past due loans of 90 days or more
Nonaccrual loans
2014
2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 94,759
$ 67,278
$ 90,418
$ 65,522
$
$
-
-
$
$
-
-
The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair
value disclosures. Securities available for sale and derivatives are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. From time to time, the
Company may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as impaired loans and OREO. Additionally,
the Company is required to disclose, but not record, the fair value of other financial instruments.
Fair Value Hierarchy
The Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded
and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in active
markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the
full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or
liabilities.
F-62
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments and other
accounts recorded or disclosed based on their fair value:
Cash, Due From Banks, Interest-Bearing Deposits in Banks and Federal Funds Sold: The carrying amount of cash, due from banks
, interest-bearing deposits in banks and federal funds sold approximates fair value.
Securities Available For Sale: The fair value of securities available for sale is determined by various valuation methodologies. Where
quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted
market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar
characteristics, or discounted cash flows. Level 2 securities include certain U.S. agency bonds, collateralized mortgage and debt
obligations and certain municipal securities. The level 2 fair value pricing is provided by an independent third party and is based upon
similar securities in an active market. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within
Level 3 of the hierarchy and include certain residual municipal securities and other less liquid securities.
Other Investments: FHLB stock is included in other investment securities at its original cost basis, as cost approximates fair value and
there is no ready market for such investments. It is not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on
its transferability.
Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale: The Company records mortgage loans held for sale at fair value. The fair value of mortgage loans
held for sale is determined on outstanding commitments from third party investors in the secondary markets and is classified within
Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
Loans: The carrying amount of variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk approximates
fair value. The fair value of fixed-rate loans is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows, using interest rates currently being
offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers with similar credit quality. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated based on
discounted contractual cash flows or underlying collateral values, where applicable. A loan is determined to be impaired if the Company
believes it is probable that all principal and interest amounts due according to the terms of the note will not be collected as scheduled. The
fair value of impaired loans is determined in accordance with ASC 310-10, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, and
generally results in a specific reserve established through a charge to the provision for loan losses. Losses on impaired loans are charged
to the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan is confirmed. Management has determined that the majority
of impaired loans are Level 3 assets due to the extensive use of market appraisals. To the extent that market appraisals or other methods
do not produce reliable determinations of fair value, these assets are deemed to be Level 3.
Other Real Estate Owned: The fair value of OREO is determined using certified appraisals that value the property at its highest and
best uses by applying traditional valuation methods common to the industry. The Company does not hold any OREO for profit purposes
and all other real estate is actively marketed for sale. In most cases, management has determined that additional write-downs are required
beyond what is calculable from the appraisal to carry the property at levels that would attract buyers. Because this additional write-down
is not based on observable inputs, management has determined that other real estate owned should be classified as Level 3.
Covered Assets: Covered assets include loans and other real estate owned on which the majority of losses would be covered by loss-
sharing agreements with the FDIC. Management initially valued these assets at fair value using mostly unobservable inputs and, as such,
has classified these assets as Level 3.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill: Intangible assets consist of core deposit premiums acquired in connection with business combinations
and are based on the established value of acquired customer deposits. The core deposit premium is initially recognized based on a
valuation performed as of the consummation date and is amortized over an estimated useful life of three to ten years. Goodwill represents
the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill and other
intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized but instead are subject to an annual review for impairment.
FDIC Loss-Share Receivable: Because the FDIC will reimburse the Company for certain acquired loans should the Company
experience a loss, an indemnification asset is recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The indemnification asset is recognized at
the same time as the indemnified loans, and measured on the same basis, subject to collectability or contractual limitations. The shared
loss agreements on the acquisition date reflect the reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC, using an appropriate discount
rate, which reflects counterparty credit risk and other uncertainties. The shared loss agreements continue to be measured on the same
basis as the related indemnified loans, and the loss share receivable is impacted by changes in estimated cash flows associated with these
loans.
Accrued Interest Receivable/Payable: The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates
fair value.
F-63
Cash Value of Bank Owned Life Insurance: The carrying value of cash value of bank owned life insurance approximates fair value.
Deposits: The carrying amount of demand deposits, savings deposits and variable-rate certificates of deposits approximates fair
value. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposits is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows using interest rates
currently being offered for certificates of similar maturities.
Repurchase Agreements and/or Other Borrowings: The carrying amount of variable rate borrowings and securities sold under
repurchase agreements approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed rate other borrowings is estimated based on discounted
contractual cash flows using the current incremental borrowing rates for similar type borrowing arrangements.
Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures: The carrying amount of the Company’s variable rate trust preferred securities
approximates fair value.
Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments: Because commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are typically made using variable
rates and have short maturities, the carrying value and fair value are immaterial for disclosure.
Derivatives: The Company has entered into derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk. The valuation of these
instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash
flows of the derivatives. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and uses
observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair value of the derivatives are determined
using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts and the discounted expected variable cash
payments. The variable cash payments are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves derived from observable
market interest rate curves).
The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective
counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect
of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting any applicable credit enhancements such as collateral
postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative fall within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit
spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself or the counterparty. However, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company
has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has
determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has
determined that its derivative valuation in its entirety is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the
level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:
U.S. government sponsored agencies
State, county and municipal securities
Corporate debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Mortgage loans held for sale
Mortgage banking derivative instruments
Total recurring assets at fair value
Derivative financial instruments
Mortgage banking derivative instruments
Total recurring liabilities at fair value
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
As of December 31, 2014
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(Dollars in Thousands)
-
-
-
8,248
-
-
8,248
$ 14,678
141,375
8,540
366,464
94,759
1,757
$ 627,573
-
-
-
$ 1,315
249
$ 1,564
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
2,500
-
-
-
2,500
-
-
-
Fair Value
$ 14,678
141,375
11,040
374,712
94,759
1,757
$ 638,321
$ 1,315
249
$ 1,564
F-64
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
As of December 31, 2013
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
U.S. government sponsored agencies
State, county and municipal securities
Collateralized debt obligations
Corporate debt securities
Mortgage-backed securities
Mortgage loans held for sale
Mortgage banking derivative instruments
Total recurring assets at fair value
Fair Value
$ 13,926
112,754
1,480
10,325
347,750
67,278
1,180
$ 554,693
(Dollars in Thousands)
$
-
-
1,480
-
182,461
-
-
$ 183,941
$ 13,926
112,754
-
8,325
165,289
67,278
1,180
$ 368,752
Derivative financial instruments
Total recurring liabilities at fair value
$
$
370
370
$
$
-
-
$
$
370
370
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
2,000
-
-
-
2,000
-
-
The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, as well as the general
classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Fair Value Measurements on a Nonrecurring Basis
As of December 31, 2014
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
(Dollars in Thousands)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
$
$
30,479
15,585
19,907
65,971
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
$
$
42,546
4,276
45,893
92,715
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
Fair Value Measurements on a Nonrecurring Basis
As of December 31, 2013
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
(Dollars in Thousands)
Impaired loans carried at fair value
Purchased, non-covered other real estate owned
Covered other real estate owned
Total nonrecurring assets at fair value
Fair Value
$ 30,479
15,585
19,907
$ 65,971
Impaired loans carried at fair value
Purchased, non-covered other real estate owned
Covered other real estate owned
Total nonrecurring assets at fair value
Fair Value
$ 42,546
4,276
45,893
$ 92,715
F-65
The inputs used to determine estimated fair value of impaired loans and covered loans include market conditions, loan term, underlying
collateral characteristics and discount rates. The inputs used to determine fair value of other real estate owned and covered other real
estate owned include market conditions, estimated marketing period or holding period, underlying collateral characteristics and discount
rates.
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, there was not a change in the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate
fair value.
The following table shows significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of Level 3 assets and liabilities.
Fair Value
Valuation Technique
Unobservable Inputs
Range of
Discounts
Weighted
Average
Discount
As of December 31, 2014
Nonrecurring:
Impaired loans
Purchased non-covered real estate owned
Covered real estate owned
Recurring:
Investment securities available for sale
As of December 31, 2013
Nonrecurring:
Impaired loans
Purchased non-covered real estate owned
Covered real estate owned
Recurring:
Investment securities available for sale
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30,479
Third party appraisals
and discounted cash flows
15,585
Third party appraisals
19,907
Third party appraisals
Collateral discounts and
discount rates
Collateral discounts and
estimated costs to sell
Collateral discounts and
estimated costs to sell
0% - 50%
10% -96%
10% - 90%
2,500
Discounted par values
Credit quality of
underlying issuer
0%
42,546
Third party appraisals
and discounted cash flows
4,276
Third party appraisals
45,893
Third party appraisals
Collateral discounts and
discount rates
Collateral discounts and
estimated costs to sell
Collateral discounts and
estimated costs to sell
4% - 75%
15% - 63%
10% - 86%
2,000
Discounted par values
Credit quality of
underlying issuer
0%
20%
33%
15%
0%
23%
29%
17%
0%
F-66
The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, not shown elsewhere in these financial statements,
were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 Using:
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks ................... $
Federal funds sold and interest-
bearing accounts ............................
Loans, net ...........................................
FDIC loss-share receivable ................
Accrued interest receivable ................
Financial liabilities:
Deposits .............................................
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase .....................................
Other borrowings ...............................
Accrued interest payable ....................
Subordinated deferrable interest
debentures .....................................
Carrying
Amount
Level 1
Level 2
(Dollars in Thousands)
Level 3
Total
78,026
$
78,026 $
92,323
2,783,763
31,351
17,023
92,323
-
-
17,023
- $
-
-
-
-
- $
78,026
2,785,627
18,764
-
92,323
2,785,627
18,764
17,023
3,431,149
-
3,432,059
-
3,432,059
73,310
78,881
1,382
65,325
73,310
-
1,382
-
78,881
-
-
46,564
-
-
-
-
73,310
78,881
1,382
46,564
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks ................... $
Federal funds sold and interest-
bearing accounts ............................
Loans, net ...........................................
FDIC loss-share receivable ................
Accrued interest receivable ................
Financial liabilities:
Deposits .............................................
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase .....................................
Other borrowings ...............................
Accrued interest payable ....................
Subordinated deferrable interest
debentures .....................................
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 Using:
Level 1
Level 2
(Dollars in Thousands)
Level 3
Total
62,955
$
62,955 $
204,984
2,392,521
65,441
15,071
204,984
-
-
15,071
- $
-
-
-
-
- $
62,995
-
2,404,909
61,317
-
204,984
2,404,909
61,317
15,071
2,999,231
-
3,000,061
-
3,000,061
83,516
194,572
1,431
55,466
83,516
-
1,431
-
194,572
-
-
36,277
-
-
-
-
83,516
194,572
1,431
36,277
F-67
NOTE 23 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accumulated other comprehensive income for the Company consists of changes in net unrealized gains and losses on investment
securities available for sale and interest rate swap derivatives. The reclassification for gains included in net income is recorded in net
gains on sales of securities in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The following tables present a summary of the accumulated other
comprehensive income balances, net of tax, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance, January 1, 2014 ................................................... $
Reclassification for gains included in net income ..............
Current year changes ..........................................................
Balance, December 31, 2014.............................................. $
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
1,397
-
(889)
508
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
on Securities
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
$
$
(1,691)
(90)
7,371
5,590
$
$
(294)
(90)
6,482
6,098
(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance, January 1, 2013 ................................................... $
Reclassification for gains included in net income ..............
Current year changes ..........................................................
Balance, December 31, 2013.............................................. $
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
(23)
-
1,420
1,397
Unrealized Gain (Loss)
on Securities
$
$
6,630
(111)
(8,210)
(1,691)
$
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
6,607
(111)
(6,790)
(294)
$
NOTE 24 – SEGMENT REPORTING
The following table presents selected financial information with respect to the Company’s reportable business segments for the years
ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits
Equipment and occupancy expenses
Data processing and telecommunications expenses
Other expenses
Total noninterest expense
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Less preferred stock dividends
Net income available to common shareholders
Total assets
Stockholders’ equity
Total
$ 149,886
5,648
62,836
73,878
17,521
15,551
43,919
150,869
56,205
17,482
38,723
286
$ 38,437
$ 4,037,077
$ 366,028
Year Ended
December 31, 2014
Retail Banking
Division
Mortgage Banking
Division
SBA
Division
(Dollars in Thousands)
$ 7,360
826
25,614
16,173
1,343
1,097
3,995
22,608
9,540
3,339
6,201
-
$ 6,201
$223,090
$ 8,306
$ 2,066
-
4,885
2,604
81
18
749
3,452
3,499
1,225
2,274
-
$ 2,274
$ 62,484
$ 4,190
$ 140,460
4,822
32,337
55,101
16,097
14,436
39,175
124,809
43,166
12,918
30,248
286
$ 29,962
$3,751,503
$ 353,532
F-68
Year Ended
December 31, 2013
Retail Banking
Division
Mortgage Banking
Division
SBA
Division
(Dollars in Thousands)
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits
Equipment and occupancy expenses
Data processing and telecommunications expenses
Other expenses
Total noninterest expense
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Less preferred stock dividends
Net income available to common shareholders
Total assets
Stockholders’ equity
$ 110,582
11,486
25,282
43,524
11,599
10,957
36,850
102,930
21,448
(6,536)
14,912
1,738
$ 13,174
$3,506,954
$ 312,678
$ 3,883
-
19,130
12,515
631
573
4,386
18,105
4,908
(1,718)
3,190
-
$ 3,190
$122,427
$ 2,105
$ 1,720
-
2,137
631
56
9
214
910
2,947
(1,031)
1,916
-
$ 1,916
$ 38,268
$ 1,916
Year Ended
December 31, 2012
Retail Banking
Division
Mortgage Banking
Division
SBA
Division
(Dollars in Thousands)
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits
Equipment and occupancy expenses
Data processing and telecommunications expenses
Other expenses
Total noninterest expense
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Less preferred stock dividends
Net income available to common shareholders
$ 113,347
31,089
44,885
45,456
12,726
10,341
41,056
109,579
17,564
(5,831)
11,733
3,577
$ 8,156
$ 1,058
-
12,989
7,666
482
342
1,401
9,891
4,156
(1,454)
2,702
-
$ 2,702
Total assets
Stockholders’ equity
$2,938,519
$ 278,901
$ 80,533
$ 116
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total
$ 116,185
11,486
46,549
56,670
12,286
11,539
41,450
121,945
29,303
(9,285)
20,018
1,738
$ 18,280
$ 3,667,649
$ 316,699
Total
114,405
31,089
57,874
53,122
13,208
10,683
42,457
119,470
21,720
(7,285)
14,435
3,577
$ 10,858
$ 3,019,052
$ 279,017
F-69
NOTE 25 - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited)
The following table sets forth certain consolidated quarterly financial information of the Company.
Selected Income Statement Data:
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Acquisition related expenses
Income before income taxes
Income tax
Net income
Preferred stock dividends
Net income available to common stockholders
Per Share Data:
Net income – basic
Net income – diluted
Common Dividends (Cash)
Common Dividends (Stock)
Selected Income Statement Data:
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
4
$ 44,900
3,894
41,006
888
40,118
16,362
41,666
67
14,747
4,167
10,580
-
$ 10,580
0.40
0.39
0.05
-
4
Quarters Ended December 31, 2014
3
2
1
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
$ 43,186
4,054
39,132
1,669
37,463
17,901
38,028
551
16,785
5,122
11,663
-
$ 11,663
0.44
0.43
0.05
-
$ 38,607
3,343
35,264
1,365
$ 37,873
3,389
34,484
1,726
33,899
15,819
34,446
2,872
12,400
4,270
8,130
-
8,130
0.32
0.32
0.05
-
$
$
32,758
12,754
32,789
450
12,273
3,923
8,350
286
8,064
0.32
0.32
-
-
1
Quarters Ended December 31, 2013
3
2
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
$ 31,749
2,698
29,051
1,478
$ 31,749
2,429
29,320
2,920
$ 31,951
2,475
29,476
4,165
$ 30,873
2,535
28,338
2,923
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Acquisition related expenses
Income before income taxes
Income tax
Net income
Preferred stock dividends
Net income available to common stockholders
$
Per Share Data:
Net income – basic
Net income – diluted
Common Dividends (Cash)
Common Dividends (Stock)
27,573
11,517
33,274
4,350
1,466
88
1,378
412
966
0.04
0.04
-
-
26,400
12,288
28,237
512
9,939
3,262
6,677
443
6,234
0.26
0.26
-
-
$
25,311
11,384
26,688
-
10,007
3,329
6,678
442
6,236
0.26
0.26
-
-
$
25,415
11,360
28,884
-
7,891
2,606
5,285
441
4,844
0.20
0.20
-
-
$
F-70
NOTE 26. CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF AMERIS BANCORP (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013
(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
Investment in subsidiaries
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Other liabilities
Other borrowings
Subordinated deferrable interest debentures
Total liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
2014
2013
868
$
470,557
6,552
3,550
$
386,377
6,824
$ 477,977
$ 396,751
$ 7,624
39,000
65,325
14
$
24,572
55,466
111,949
80,052
366,028
316,699
$ 477,977
$ 396,751
F-71
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014, 2013 AND 2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
Income
Dividends from subsidiaries
Gain on sale of securities
Other income
Total income
Expense
Interest
Other expense
Total expense
2014
2013
2012
$29,000
-
235
29,235
$ 2,200
-
26
2,226
$ 29,000
214
106
29,320
4,558
2,253
6,811
1,527
1,133
2,660
1,489
1,545
3,034
Earnings (loss) before income tax benefit and dividends received in excess of
(434
earnings of subsidiaries and equity in undistributed income (loss) of subsidiaries
22,424
)
26,286
Income tax benefit
Earnings (loss) before dividends received in excess of earnings of
subsidiaries and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
Dividends received in excess of earnings of subsidiaries
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
Net income
Preferred stock dividend
Net income available to common shareholders
2,468
921
921
24,892
487
27,207
-
13,831
-
19,531
(12,772)
-
38,723
20,018
14,435
286
1,738
3,577
$38,437
$18,280
$ 10,858
F-72
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014, 2013 AND 2012
(Dollars in Thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
Stock-based compensation expense
Dividends received in excess of earnings of subsidiaries
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
(Increase) decrease in interest payable
Decrease in tax receivable
Provision for deferred taxes
Other operating activities
Total adjustments
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net cash proceeds received from acquisitions
Net cash provided by investing activities
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Repurchase of warrant
Purchase of treasury shares
Dividends paid preferred stock
Dividends paid common stock
Proceeds from other borrowings
Repayment of other borrowings
Repurchase of preferred stock
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net change in cash and due from banks
Cash and due from banks at beginning of year
Cash and due from banks at end of year
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the year for interest
Cash paid during the year for income taxes
2014
2013
2012
$ 38,723
$ 20,018
$ 14,435
2,058
-
(13,831)
(214)
(256)
(426)
(1,558)
(14,227)
1,041
-
(19,531)
(5,300)
(813)
39
(2,686)
(27,250)
1,044
12,772
-
(108)
(786)
14
(388)
12,548
24,496
(7,232)
26,983
144
144
249
249
-
-
-
(474)
(286)
(4,016)
14,000
(9,005)
(28,000)
459
-
(116)
(1,400)
-
10,000
-
-
410
(2,670)
(235)
(2,642)
-
-
-
(24,000)
3
(27,322)
8,894
(29,544)
(2,682)
3,550
1,911
1,639
(2,561)
4,200
$
868
$ 3,550
$ 1,639
$ 4,772
-
$
$ 1,523
-
$
$ 1,597
-
$
F-73
NOTE 27 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On January 28, 2015, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Merchants & Southern
Banks of Florida, Incorporated, a Florida corporation (“Merchants”), and Dennis R. O’Neil, the sole shareholder of Merchants.
Merchants and Southern Bank is a wholly owned banking subsidiary of Merchants that has a total of thirteen banking locations in
Alachua, Marion and Clay Counties, Florida. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company will purchase all of the
issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Merchants for a total purchase price of $50,000,000. As of December 31, 2014,
Merchants reported assets of $473 million, gross loans of $214 million and deposits of $336 million. The purchase price will be allocated
among the assets of Merchants acquired as appropriate, with the remaining balance being reported as goodwill. Consummation of the
acquisition is subject to customary conditions, including the receipt of required regulatory approvals. The transaction is expected to
close during the second quarter of 2015.
On January 28, 2015, the Bank, entered into a Purchase and Assumption Agreement (the “P&A Agreement”) with Bank of America,
National Association pursuant to which the Bank has agreed to purchase, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the P&A
Agreement, eighteen branches of Bank of America, National Association located in Calhoun, Columbia, Dixie, Hamilton, Suwanee and
Walton Counties, Florida and Ben Hill, Colquitt, Dougherty, Laurens, Liberty, Thomas, Tift and Ware Counties, Georgia. The Bank
will assume an estimated $812 million of deposits at a deposit premium of 3.00 percent based on deposit balances near the time the
transaction closes. The Bank will also acquire an immaterial amount of loans as part of the transaction. Consummation of the acquisition
is subject to customary conditions, including the receipt of required regulatory approvals. The transaction is expected to close during
the second quarter of 2015.
On January 29, 2015, the Company completed a private placement of 5,320,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of
$22.50 per share. The Company received net proceeds from the issuance of approximately $114.5 million (after deducting placement
agent commissions and the Company’s estimated expenses). The Company intends to use the net proceeds to fund the acquisitions
discussed above, as well as for general corporate purposes.
F-74
Following is a list of the Registrant’s subsidiaries and the state of incorporation or other jurisdiction.
REGISTRANT’S SUBSIDIARIES
Exhibit 21.1
Name of Subsidiary
Ameris Bank
Ameris Statutory Trust I
Ameris Sub Holding Company, Inc.
Moultrie Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
Quitman Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
Thomas Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
Citizens Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
Cairo Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
Southland Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
Cordele Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
First National Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
M&F Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
Tri-County Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
First National Banc Statutory Trust I
Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust II
Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust III
Prosperity Bank Statutory Trust IV
Prosperity Banking Capital Trust I
Prosperity Land Holdings, LLC
Coastal Bankshares Statutory Trust I
State of Incorporation or
Other Jurisdiction
State of Georgia
State of Delaware
State of Delaware
State of Delaware
State of Delaware
State of Delaware
State of Delaware
State of Delaware
State of Alabama
State of Delaware
State of Delaware
State of Delaware
State of Delaware
State of Delaware
State of Connecticut
State of Delaware
State of Delaware
State of Delaware
State of Florida
State of Delaware
Coastal Bankshares Statutory Trust II
State of Connecticut
Each subsidiary conducts business under the name listed above.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-186546 and 333-202277) on Form S-3 and in
Registration Statement (No. 333-131244, 333-197208 and 333-200597) on Form S-8 of Ameris Bancorp and subsidiaries (the
“Company”) of our report dated March 16, 2015, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control
over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
/s/ CROWE HORWATH LLP
Exhibit 23.1
Atlanta, Georgia
March 16, 2015
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-186546 and 333-202277) on Form S-3 and in
Registration Statement (No. 333-131244, 333-197208 and 333-200597) on Form S-8 of Ameris Bancorp and subsidiaries (the
“Company”) of our report dated March 14, 2014, relating to our audits of the 2013 and 2012 consolidated financial statements and
internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
/s/ PORTER KEADLE MOORE, LLC
Exhibit 23.2
Atlanta, Georgia
March 16, 2015
CERTIFICATION
Exhibit 31.1
I, Edwin W. Hortman, Jr., certify that:
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, of Ameris Bancorp;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: March 16, 2015
/s/ Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.
Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
CERTIFICATION
Exhibit 31.2
I, Dennis J. Zember Jr., certify that:
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, of Ameris Bancorp;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: March 16, 2015
/s/ Dennis J. Zember Jr.
Dennis J. Zember Jr.,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal accounting and financial officer)
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
Exhibit 32.1
I, Edwin W. Hortman, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of Ameris Bancorp (the “Company”), do hereby certify, in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Periodic Report”) fully
1.
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
2.
Dated: March 16, 2015
/s/ Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.
Edwin W. Hortman, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
Exhibit 32.2
I, Dennis J. Zember Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ameris Bancorp (the “Company”), do hereby certify,
in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Periodic Report”) fully
1.
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
2.
Dated: March 16 , 2015
/s/ Dennis J. Zember Jr.
Dennis J. Zember Jr.,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal accounting and financial officer)
Common Stock and Dividend information
Ameris Bancorp Common Stock is listed on the nASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “ABCB”. the following table sets
forth the low and high sales prices for the common stock as quoted on nASDAQ during 2014.
caleNdar PerIod
______________________________________________________________________
2014
First Quarter
Second Quarter
third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
sales PrIce
low
High
$19.86 $24.00
$19.73 $23.90
$21.00 $24.04
$21.95 $26.48
–
$.05
$.05
$.05
dIVIdeNds
the Company did not declare any dividends for the first quarter of 2014.
sHareHolder serVIces
Computershare is Ameris Bancorp’s stock transfer agent and administers all matters related to our stock. You may contact them via:
First class, registered or certified mail:
courier service:
Computershare investor Services
p.o. Box 30170
College Station, tX 77842-3170
Computershare investor Services
211 Quality Circle, Suite 210
College Station, tX 77845
Shareholder Services number(s): (800) 568-3476
investor Centre™ portal: www.computershare.com/investor
if your stock is held by a broker, please contact your broker.
aVaIlaBIlItY oF INFormatIoN
upon written request, Ameris Bancorp will provide, without charge, a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the financial
statements and the financial statement schedules, required to be filed with the Securities and exchange Commission for the fiscal year 2014.
please direct requests to:
Ameris Bancorp
Attention: Cara Monfort, investor Relations
p.o. Box 3668
Moultrie, GA 31776-3668
aNNual meetINg oF sHareHolders
the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Ameris Bancorp will be held at 2:00 pM eDt, thursday, May 28, 2015, at the Company’s
offices located at 24 Second Avenue, Southeast, Moultrie, Georgia.
Mixed Sources: Produced
using sustainable methods with
materials from well-managed
forests, controlled sources or
recycled wood or fi ber.
amERIs BaNK LOCaTIONs
FuLL sERVICE BaNKINg OFFICEs
mORTgagE OFFICEs
aLaBama
Abbeville
Dothan
Dothan Highway 84
eufaula
Headland
FLORIDa
Crawfordville
Fleming island
Jacksonville Julington Creek
Jacksonville lane Avenue
Jacksonville Mandarin
Jacksonville town Center
lynn Haven
orange park Blanding
ormond Beach
palatka
palatka West
palm Coast
panama City
panama City Beach
St. Augustine Beach
St. Augustine north
St. Augustine Shores
St. Augustine Southpark
tallahassee
trenton
gEORgIa
Albany
Atlanta Midtown
Brunswick
Brunswick north Glynn
Buena Vista
Butler
Cairo
Cairo Drive thru
Colquitt
Cordele
Doerun
Donalsonville
Doulgas east
Douglas West
ellaville
Hinesville
Jekyll island
lyons
Moultrie
Alpharetta Mortgage
Duluth Mortgage
Marietta Mortgage
Richmond Hill Mortgage
Statesboro Mortgage
Stockbridge Mortgage
tallahassee Mortgage
tennessee Mortgage
Moultrie Quitman Highway
Moultrie Sunset
ocilla
pooler Godley Station
pooler West Highway
Quitman
Richmond Hill
Rincon
Savannah Drayton Street
Savannah Stephenson Avenue
St. Marys
St. Simons island
thomasville
tifton
tifton ocilla Road
Valdosta
Vidalia Downtown
Vidalia First Street
sOuTH CaROLINa
Beaufort
Charleston West Ashley
Columbia
Greenville Downtown
Greenville Woodruff Road
Hilton Head island
irmo
lexington
Mt. pleasant
Summerville
taylors tigerville Road
Scan the QR code or visit amerisbank.com
for a detailed listing of locations and hours.
170 | AMeRiS BAnCoRp
Nashville
Greenville
Charlotte
Columbia
Atlanta
Augusta
Macon
Beaufort
Charleston
Hilton Head
Tifton
HEADQUARTERS
MOULTRIE, GA
Valdosta
Savannah
Brunswick
Montgomery
Albany
Dothan
Panama City
Mobile
Tallahassee
Jacksonville
St. Augustine
Gainesville
Orlando
Tampa
amERIs BaNK LOCaTIONs
Nashville
Greenville
Charlotte
Columbia
Atlanta
Augusta
Macon
Beaufort
Charleston
Hilton Head
Montgomery
Albany
Mobile
Dothan
Panama City
ameris Bank Locations
moultrie Campus
Tifton
HEADQUARTERS
MOULTRIE, GA
Valdosta
Savannah
Brunswick
Tallahassee
Jacksonville
St. Augustine
Gainesville
Orlando
Tampa
AnnuAl RepoR t 2014 | 171
310 First Street, Se
po Box 3668
Moultrie, GA 31776
(p) 229.890.1111 | (F) 229.890.2235
amerisbank.com
002CSn4A16 Annual Report