Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Aurelia Metals Limited

Aurelia Metals Limited

ami · ASX Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker ami
Exchange ASX
Sector Basic Materials
Industry
Employees 501-1000
← All annual reports
FY2023 Annual Report · Aurelia Metals Limited
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
ANNUAL 
REPORT 
2023 
—

FY23 HIGHLIGHTS  
—

A 41% decrease in Total Recordable Injury Frequency 
Rate (TRIFR) to 5.13 (FY22: 8.7) that continues 
year-on-year improvements. 

Improvement in Recordable Environmental Incident 
Frequency Rate (REIFR) to 2.91 (FY22: 3.8) highlights 
Group environmental excellence.

Record volumes mined and milled at Dargues.

Development Consent received for the 
Federation Project.  

Debt free at 30 June 2023 with term loan repaid 
from operating cash flow.

Balance sheet transformed with a new  
~A$100 million financing facility to fund development 
of the Federation Project – one of the highest grade 
base metal development projects in Australia. 

ABOUT THIS REPORT 

This Annual Report is a summary of Aurelia and our subsidiaries’ operations, 
activities, and financial position as at 30 June 2023 – financial year 2023 (FY23).

We are committed to reducing the environmental impact associated with the 
production of this Annual Report. Annual Reports are only printed and posted 
to shareholders who have elected to receive a printed copy.

This and previous Annual Reports are available on the Company’s website,  
https://aureliametals.com/investors/company-reporting/ 

The Peak Mine processing plant at dusk

2 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023CONTENTS 
—

FY23 Highlights

Chair's Letter

Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer’s Report

We are Aurelia

Our Profile

Our Portfolio

Our Vision, Values and Strategy

Our Financial and Operating Performance

Our Production Performance 

Our Mines 

Our Projects

Sustainability Report

Financial Report

Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Statement

Unaudited Periodic Report Verification 
Procedure

Shareholder Information

Schedule of Tenement Interests

Company Information

2

4

8

10

10

11

12

14

14

15

18

22

73

64

191

192

194

199

3 
—

AURELIA METALSCHAIR’S LETTER  
—

Dear Shareholders

The last twelve months have been keenly challenging 
for all at Aurelia Metals. For our Board, our employees 
and our shareholders. Following a year of unacceptable 
and deteriorating performance, the Company embarked 
on a series of changes that I believe has provided a 
strong platform to deliver future enhanced value to our 
shareholders, while providing a safe, supportive and 
rewarding environment for our employees and contractors. 

There is still an enormous amount of work to do to restore 
our true value and deliver future growth but I believe the 
ship has turned with refreshed leadership. We now have 
a foundation to deliver on our commitments of improving 
operational performance, develop our premier Federation 
Project, optimise the value of our infrastructure and mining 
assets in the Cobar Basin, and leverage our talented and 
dedicated people for years to come.

At last year’s Annual General Meeting, I announced three 
priorities for the Company that would be our focus for the 
year ahead:

1)  Recover strong and consistent operational performance 
to ensure high margin, low-cost production and deliver 
predictable cash flows to fund future growth.

2)  Ensure highly experienced and skilled executives are in 

place to drive our performance and deliver superior value.

3)  Secure a competitive funding solution to underwrite 
the development of our quality Federation and 
Great Cobar Projects.

These priorities were translated into a comprehensive and 
far-reaching Organisational Renewal Program comprising 
five strategic themes. I’m pleased to report we have seen 
significant progress against each of these strategies through 
the year. 

Safety

Given the size and scope of the Organisational Renewal 
Program, maintaining safety performance through a sustained 
period of change was front and centre for Aurelia in FY23. 
We challenged our leaders to ensure the health, safety and 
wellbeing of our people were not compromised during this 
dynamic period of change and they certainly delivered. 

On 30 June 2023, Aurelia was pleased to report strong safety 
performance with a Group Total Recordable Injury Frequency 
Rate (TRIFR) of 5.13 (FY22: 8.7). This included operating 
during the entire second half of the year with no recordable 
incidents across the Aurelia portfolio. 

Safety performance at Dargues hit a particular high note with 
the mine recording 12 months injury free on 30 June 2023 
bringing their FY23 TRIFR to zero.

4 
—

Operational performance and cash management

Despite a difficult first half, site-by-site improvement 
initiatives drove achievement of FY23 Guidance including 
outperformance of gold production at 86,000 ounces at an 
All-In-Sustaining-Cost of A$2,315 per ounce.

At Hera, a change in the mine plan in December returned the 
asset to positive cash generation, marked by a very strong 
finish to operations in late March 2023. The mine was closed 
and the surface facilities were successfully transitioned 
to care and maintenance in April, with much of the asset’s 
significant infrastructure earmarked for use at the Federation 
Mine as it comes online.

At the Peak Mine, Aurelia’s cornerstone asset, our focus was 
managing costs. The transition to owner-mining concluded at 
the end of April 2023, resulting in a sharp reduction in mining 
costs that improved cash flows. Work has also commenced 
to improve development and further drive down costs, as we 
pursue better production outcomes.

The Dargues Mine continued to be a reliable, stable operation 
throughout the year, with efforts targeted towards increasing 
cash flows. In December, the New South Wales (NSW) 
Department of Planning and Environment approved our 
application to lift processing rates 15% from 355 thousand 
tonnes per annum (ktpa) to 415ktpa. This allowed increased 
throughput rates and improved cash flows in the second half 
of the year.

Perhaps the most inspiring effort to improve organisational 
efficiency came with the introduction of the Working 
Smarter Program. More than 220 ideas flowed across the 
organisation, resulting in A$25.6 million in cost savings 
and efficiency equivalent value, A$15.8 million of which is 
ongoing savings due to sustainable changes in operating 
methods, processes or equipment. This beat the A$24 million 
target, demonstrating our employees are some of the most 
passionate in the industry when it comes to rebuilding 
organisational success.

At year end, together these initiatives resulted in:

 Š significant cash generation with earnings before interest, 
taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of A$55.8 
million (FY22: A$166.51 million), up from A$12 million in the 
first half of the year

 Š ~A$40 million directed towards repayment of the  
pre-existing term loan, and a full cash-backed 
performance bond facility for rehabilitation

 Š cash at 30 June 2023 of A$38.9 million 

(FY22: A$76.7 million) excluding the performance bond 
cash backing.

ANNUAL REPORT 2023Optimisation of the high grade Federation Project

A Federation-led future is well on its way, as the Company 
made important steps towards bringing one of the highest 
grade base metal development projects in Australia 
into production.

On 10 October 2022, the Federation Mine (Federation) 
Feasibility Study was released, confirming a capital efficient 
project that will benefit strongly from our established mine 
and milling infrastructure and generate impressive rates of 
return for our shareholders. 

The Project received development consent from the NSW 
government in March 2023 and is currently finalising 
secondary approvals to start mining development of ore by 
the first half of FY25. With the timeframe from discovery to 
first production of just six years, Federation will be one of the 
fastest development projects in recent NSW history, backed 
by the strong belief the Board has in the potential of the 
Project to materially grow Aurelia’s shareholder value.

In April, the Company provided an update, which further 
refined the Feasibility Study and delivered an improved 
path to production, lower capital expenditure, along with 
an updated mine design to increase operational efficiency. 
It also confirmed a mine production target of 4.0 million 
tonnes (Mt) for an initial 8-year life with an expected average 
annual steady state recovered metal production of 45kt zinc, 
46kt lead, 1kt copper, 15 thousand ounces (koz) gold and 
39koz silver.

Federation funding

A key activity through the year was delivery of a flexible and 
competitive funding package to transform the Company’s 
balance sheet. The effort to secure the best solution for our 
business and to protect shareholder value was significant 
and far-reaching. A range of options were reviewed through 
a comprehensive analysis. Despite the tough economic 
environment, characterised by climbing interest rates, 
the Aurelia team was successful in delivering a cost effective 
and comprehensive solution while managing the repayment 
of our existing debt facility.

On 31 May 2023, we were pleased to announce the execution 
of a new ~A$100 million financing facility with Trafigura 
Pte Ltd (Trafigura) comprising a US$24 million Loan Note 
Advance and up to a A$65 million Performance Bond Facility. 

To accompany the Trafigura facilities, Aurelia completed a 
A$40 million equity raising with receipt of proceeds from 
the institutional placement and entitlement offer received in 
June 2023. Proceeds from the retail entitlement offer were 
received in July 2023.

Subsequent to the announcement of the Trafigura financing 
facility, the Company remobilised its mining contractor to the 

Peter Botten, AC, CBE  
Non-Executive Chair

Federation site, and development recommenced on  
1 August 2023. 

Leadership renewal

While initiatives to lead the business turnaround were 
designed and implemented, it was critical the Board’s focus 
turned to securing highly capable executives to ensure the 
change could be sustained.

These efforts began with the appointment of Martin 
Cummings as the Company’s new Chief Financial Officer. 
Martin is a highly-experienced mining executive with over 
25 years’ financial, commercial, treasury and investor 
relations experience. This experience served us well 
in the pursuit of the Trafigura financing facility, which 
Martin secured to fully fund the business and protect the 
outstanding rates of return on offer from the Company’s 
growth projects.

Following the departure of our Managing Director and 
Chief Executive Officer, Dan Clifford in November 2022, 
Andrew Graham was appointed Interim Chief Executive and 
effectively led the turn round in Company performance in a 
highly skilled and committed way. Andrew did an outstanding 
job in this position and the Board extends its thanks for his 
dedication and professionalism during his time in this role

In June 2023, the Board was pleased to announce the 
appointment of a new Managing Director and Chief Executive 
Officer, Bryan Quinn. Bryan’s extensive experience at BHP 
and OZ Minerals in business improvement, operational 
excellence and project delivery, comprised the ideal 
background to help Aurelia deliver its exciting development 
projects, while optimising value and performance of its 
existing assets. Bryan has already had a significant impact 
in defining our ongoing strategy and further addressing 
improvement in our operational performance. With Bryan’s 
appointment, Andrew has taken up an expanded role in 
driving growth for the organisation as our Chief Development 
and Technical Officer. 

Health and safety

Underpinning the significant efforts to transform business 
performance in FY23 was a series of initiatives directed 
towards looking after our workforce and endeavouring to 
make Aurelia an employer of choice to address industry wide 
high levels of employee turnover. At Aurelia, we recognise 
we’re only as strong as our people who call our workplace 
their own. To support a holistic approach to our people’s 
safety and provide a safe and supportive workplace for all 
employees and contractors, during FY23 we focused on 
mental health and wellbeing with a series of workshops 
across all our sites. 

5 
—

AURELIA METALSAs part of our ongoing optimisation of governance at Aurelia, 
we will be reducing the size of the Board, while ensuring 
that the Board has relevant skills and experience to further 
drive the turnaround of business performance and build 
shareholder confidence in our delivery of value creation.

Finally, I would like to convey my sincere appreciation to you, 
Aurelia shareholders, for your support. I believe, like me, 
you recognise the significant value of the Aurelia portfolio. 
Following our efforts over the past year, I am convinced we 
have the right leaders, capability and strategies in place to 
achieve shareholder prosperity. 

Your Board looks forward to continuing to do what we say 
in FY24.

Peter Botten, AC, CBE 
Non-Executive Chair  

The four-staged program included three workshops covering 
mental health awareness (including a mental health 
workplace audit), education on mental health resilience 
and training on mental health responses for leaders and 
workplace champions. The program is supported by 
wellness resources.

Our efforts to ensure the health and safety of our workforce 
have been equally matched with our drive to ensure the same 
outcome in our environmental performance. In recognition 
of this effort, we were pleased to receive the Environmental 
Excellence Award at the NSW Minerals Council’s Health, 
Safety, Environment and Community Awards in August. 
The Award recognises the Recordable Environmental 
Incidents Frequency Rate (REIFR) reporting framework 
that has been implemented across the Company. 

Exploration

A key challenge this year has been keeping up work to realise 
the value of our extensive exploration tenement package in 
an environment of careful cost control. I’m pleased to report 
drilling in the Peak Mine province – with a view to growing the 
already substantial Mineral Resource tonnage that exists – 
yielded positive results. 

In October 2022, Aurelia announced a material increase 
to the Mineral Resource reported during the half year. 
Tonnage increased 37% to 8Mt containing more than 178kt 
of copper and 179koz of gold. 

Further geophysical surveys conducted during the year also 
returned interesting results, with targets further progressing 
up Aurelia’s exploration pipeline to be the focus of additional 
exploration work. 

Looking ahead 

Great teams are made during tough times, and all that was 
achieved in FY23 could not have been done without the 
dedication of the Aurelia workforce. I’m very proud to say 
employee commitment was the hallmark of a significant 
business turnaround and a sign of great things to come.

As I close, I would like to thank my fellow Board Directors and 
Company executives for leading the change that was required 
in FY23 to set Aurelia up for a strong future. In particular, 
I would like to recognise our new Non-Executive Director, 
Lyn Brazil, who recently joined the Board to help us chart the 
course towards restoring shareholder value. Lyn is already 
providing a valuable perspective on how we run the business 
and grow the Company. 

6 
6 
—
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023

AURELIA METALS

7 

—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
 
The shaft headframe at the Peak Mine

6 

—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023

AURELIA METALS

7 
—

MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE 
OFFICER’S REPORT  
—

Dear Shareholders

New Vision and Strategy to grow value for the future 

When I joined Aurelia in early June 2023, I approached the 
role with the intention to listen with a view to understanding 
the history of the business, its growth potential, and most 
importantly the Company’s capability and culture. 

FY23 was a year that impacted the Company greatly. 
After emerging from a period of underperformance, there 
was a clear business case for transformational change. In 
response to the challenge, the effort evoked from Aurelia 
people under a set of extremely tough circumstances 
was very inspiring. The multi-faceted Organisational 
Renewal Program requested by the Aurelia Board, 
outlined the change required and demanded the focus 
of every employee. The team worked together to return 
operational stability, maximise cashflows, optimise and 
fund the premier Federation Project, as well as recruit and 
onboard new leaders with the requisite experience to take 
the business forward. At the end of the financial year, Aurelia 
emerged as both a stronger team, delivering a record safety 
performance, and a more resilient business. We now look 
at the foundation built together as the starting point for 
a resources success story based on a new Vision, Values 
and Strategy.

And it’s not too hard to see how that could quickly become 
our reality. We have some of the largest base metal resources 
in the Cobar Basin, as well as two established mills with a 
throughput capacity of between 1.25 – 1.4Mt. We are also 
extremely fortunate with strong infrastructure and supply 
services within the town of Cobar. But perhaps our greatest 
competitive advantage is a workforce who through their own 
sweat has set the Company up for success, is dedicated to 
deliver results, and looks forward to a strong future in the 
region of NSW.

How we combine these ingredients for success into a clear, 
pragmatic plan owned by every Aurelia employee has been 
my focus during my early days as the MD and CEO.

On my first day, I joined fellow executives and senior leaders 
in a strategy planning workshop. Our goal: to determine 
our Vision for the future and establish how the Aurelia team 
would work together to deliver a Strategy to help us emerge 
from FY23 and achieve value in our portfolio, as well as 
returns for our shareholders. I am now excited to lead and 
share this new strategic direction for Aurelia.

Developing and operating a critical base  
metals company

It’s a great time to be in base metals, which will dominate 
approximately three quarters of the Aurelia portfolio by 
2026. The transition to base metals is occurring at the 
perfect time for our Company, as society ramps up efforts to 
decarbonise, rising living standards, and countries continue 
to emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic fuelling increased 
global construction activity. 

At a time when the world needs more copper and zinc to 
reach net zero, we are poised to bring on two new critical 
metals mines in the Cobar Basin, in addition to running our 
cornerstone operations at Peak. 

The Federation Project, rich in zinc, is the first project in our 
development pipeline, and the first new critical minerals mine 
in NSW in seven years. Zinc is the fourth most consumed 
metal in the world and its outlook is exciting, with demand 
set to increase given its use in the manufacturing of 
green technologies. 

Our Great Cobar Project (at Peak North) will follow, bringing 
a significant copper endowment to the portfolio. Copper 
– the metal of electrification – is essential in the adoption 
of renewable technologies. 

These projects, together with future prospects in our 
exploration pipeline, will pivot our Company to a base metals 
producer in the near term and fill our mill capacity.  

Becoming a developer and operator of choice

During my first visits to our mine sites and surrounding 
exploration assets, one thing became abundantly clear to me: 
our significant infrastructure in the Cobar Basin can unlock 
value across the region. 

Moving forward, we will leverage this infrastructure to deliver 
our Vision to ‘become a developer and operator of choice for 
critical base metals to power a low carbon society and deliver 
superior shareholder value’. To do this, we are embarking on a 
new business model – the ‘Cobar Province Model’.

This ‘hub and spoke’ approach will enable us to use our 
infrastructure to provide low-cost, capital efficient growth. 
Using our 1.25 – 1.4Mtpa processing capacity, we will ramp up 
our operations, increase cash flow and reduce costs by filling 
our mills with economic ore as quickly as possible. 

8 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
 
Bryan Quinn  
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer 

While ore is currently sourced from our existing sites, looking 
to the future, we will also explore options to work as a catalyst 
in the region to accelerate organic and inorganic growth. 
We will do this by pursuing strategic partnerships with those 
looking to break into the critical minerals space at a minority 
level interest. We will also use our assets and Resources 
where it makes commercial sense to attract investment 
and growth in the region. In this way, we can maximise 
shareholder value sooner than on our own.

A roadmap to success 

My focus has now turned to the roadmap for delivering our 
new Strategy. Developed in conjunction with our Executive 
Team and Board, the first phase of the roadmap was called 
the CEO’s 100-day plan. It builds on the momentum achieved 
by stabilising the business in FY23 through the following 
priorities:

 Š Continue to safely deliver our operational targets to 

enrich our balance sheet, including maximising cash from 
Dargues over its remaining life.

 Š Setting up the Federation Project for success will be 

immensely important. Safely delivering early works on 
time and on budget will help ensure we can maximise the 
value of this incredible resource. 

 Š Commence improvement programs at our Peak Mine to 
right size our cost base and allow us to be competitive in 
all price cycles, in addition to identifying opportunities to 
fill the Peak mill as soon as possible.

 Š Identify organic and inorganic commercial opportunities 

to maximise our value in the Cobar Basin using the ‘Cobar 
Province Model’ to grow and fill our mill capacities as 
a start.

Successful achievement of these priorities relies on ensuring 
we have a robust operating model, excellent leadership 
and a positive culture in place to attract and retain a 
high-performing workforce. Creating this environment is my 
focus and my expectation of all leaders in our business.

Finally, our commitment to sustainability will remain paramount. 
The continual improvement in safety, the wellbeing of 
our people, community engagement, and the responsible 

stewardship of the environment in which we operate, will be 
essential ingredients to our success, and to maintaining our 
social licence to operate. We have and will continue to place 
sustainability at the core of everything we do. Its importance 
is exemplified in this, our fourth Annual Report which includes 
our sustainability performance outcomes. 

Thank you

In closing I want to thank you, our valued shareholders – 
existing and new – for your continued faith in our Company. 
I also greatly appreciate your support during my transition 
into Aurelia. 

I recognise that to grow Aurelia and unlock its potential, we 
first need to regain your trust and confidence. Together with 
the Aurelia team, this is a challenge I will tackle with the same 
energy demonstrated in the second half of FY23. 

With your support, and the support from our Board, 
I’m confident we have a clear path forward that will return 
value to you and all Aurelia stakeholders.  

I want to acknowledge the significant efforts of the whole 
workforce, under the leadership of Interim Chief Executive 
Officer, Andrew Graham and the newly-appointed Chief 
Financial Officer, Martin Cummings, to deliver the priorities 
set forth by our Chair at the 2022 Annual General Meeting.

Lastly, I would like to thank the entire Aurelia team for their 
dedication to remaining safe and focused on turning our 
business around in the last half of FY23. I am honoured to 
lead you into this new chapter in Aurelia’s history.

Bryan Quinn 
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer 

9 
—

AURELIA METALS 
 
WE ARE  
AURELIA  
—

The conveyor and coarse ore stockpile 
at the Peak Mine

OUR PROFILE 
— 

Aurelia Metals (‘Aurelia’, ‘the Company’) is an Australian 
mining and exploration company with a highly strategic 
landholding, two operating mines, and two development 
projects in NSW. 

We own and operate two underground mines and processing 
facilities in NSW and have an enviable portfolio of organic 
growth prospects in the region. 

Our Peak Mine comprises two separate underground 
polymetallic mines and an 800ktpa base metals and gold 
processing plant. Peak is in the northern Cobar Basin, 
south of Cobar, a town in central-west NSW.

Our Dargues Mine is a gold-mining and milling operation 
located in the Southern Tablelands region in NSW, 
approximately 60 kilometres (km) southeast of Canberra. 
The facility includes an underground mine, processing plant 
and associated surface facilities.

The Hera mining operation, also located in the Cobar Basin, 
has ceased and the surface facilities have been placed into 
care and maintenance. Hera’s 455ktpa processing plant is 
equipped with a three-stage crushing, gravity gold and base 
metals flotation and concentrate leach circuit. 

10 
—

In the Cobar Basin, we hold one of the most geologically 
prospective ground positions in Australia and have the 
expertise and capability to discover and convert this 
endowment to unlock exceptional value for our shareholders. 

Our premier Federation Project is one of the highest-grade 
base metal development projects in Australia. Receiving 
Development Consent from the NSW Department of Planning 
and Environment in March 2023, the Federation deposit 
hosts high-grade zinc, lead, and gold mineralisation and 
remains open at depth. 

Our Great Cobar Project involves the development of satellite 
base metals and a gold deposit, north of, and accessible from, 
the New Cobar mining complex at the Peak Mine. 

From exploration through to operations and into closure, we 
are committed to minimising the environmental impacts of 
our operations.

Aurelia Metals is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange 
(ASX) (ASX code: AMI) and is headquartered in Brisbane 
(Queensland, Australia).

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OUR PORTFOLIO  
—

Cobar

Great Cobar

BARRIER HIGHWAY

Peak
Mine

Canbelego

C
A
N
B
E
L
E
G
O

R
O
A
D

Y
A
W
N
A
M
D
K

I

LEGEND

Processing Facility
Operating Mine
Development Project
Tenement Holding
Road
Locality

PRIORY TANK ROAD

Nymagee

D
A
O
D R
O
O
W

GLEN

B

Hera

A

L

O

W

R

A

R

O

A

D

Federation

Peak Mine

NSW

Cobar

Nymagee

Hera 
and 
Federation

Sydney

Canberra

Dargues Mine

D

A ROA
RIG
NER

E   R I V E R   R O A D
Braidwood

L I T

T

L

A

R

A

L

U

E

N

R

O

A

D

KINGS HIGHWAY

LEGEND

Processing Facility
Operating Mine
Tenement Holding
Road
Locality

K

I

N

G

S

H

I

G

H

W

A

Y

BOMBAY ROAD

D

A

O

A   R

M

O

O

C

D
A
O
R
K
E
E
R
C
S
R
O
J
A
M

Dargues Mine

Majors Creek

Araluen

11 
—

AURELIA METALS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OUR 
VISION

Developer and operator of choice for critical 
base metals to power a low carbon future 
and deliver superior shareholder value

OUR VALUES 

CARE

CURIOSITY

NIMBLE

ONE TEAM

 Š We respect our people, 

 Š We are interested in 

communities and 
the environment.

the ideas of others and 
value diverse opinions.

 Š We act with integrity 
and want to make 
a difference.

 Š We do what’s right 

and own the outcome 
of our efforts.

 Š We are committed 

to safety first.

 Š We ask questions, 
seek information 
and challenge the 
status quo.

 Š We make informed 
decisions and learn 
from success as well 
as failures.

 Š We actively participate 
and work together 
towards shared goals.

 Š We acknowledge 
and celebrate the 
achievements of teams 
and individuals.

 Š We trust each other 

– we are open, 
supportive and strive 
for collective success.

 Š We are proactive 
in identifying 
and addressing 
emerging challenges 
and opportunities.

 Š We are open and 

receptive to change, 
quickly responding 
to evolving 
circumstances.

 Š We make timely 
decisions based 
on available 
information to avoid 
unnecessary delays.

12 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023

AURELIA METALS

13 

—

METALS THAT MATTER

OUR STRATEGY 

DELIVER WITH 
CONFIDENCE

IMPROVE  
OUR OPERATING 
MARGIN

RIGHT PEOPLE, 
RIGHT MINDSET

FOCUSED 
GROWTH

 Š Develop integrated 
and robust plans 
with contingency.

 Š Clear accountability 
of targets across the 
organisation for all 
leaders and teams.

 Š Implement our 
management 
operating system 
and embed 
consistent processes.

 Š Make decisions based 
on data, then learn 
from the outcomes.

 Š Deploy plans that 

deliver our operational 
targets in a safe and 
sustainable manner.

 Š Drive investor 
engagement.

 Š Drive down costs and 
improve margins at 
all operations.

 Š Maximise utilisation 

of established 
infrastructure.

 Š Scale our organisation 
to endure through 
the cycle.

 Š Optimise metal 

recovery and extract 
full value from our 
products.

 Š Establish strategic 
partnerships and 
deliver value from 
our contract spend.

 Š Maximise 

shareholder value.

 Š Attract talent by 
demonstrating 
a superior value 
proposition for 
our people.

 Š Cultivate leadership 
excellence through 
development, support 
and feedback.

 Š Anticipate workforce 
needs and grow 
a pipeline of 
talent through the 
development of 
our people.

 Š Create a one team 

culture by engaging 
people in the way 
we work.

 Š Increase mineral 
endowment by 
expanding near 
mine and historic 
mineral resources 
in combination with 
regional discoveries.

 Š Optimise the Cobar 
Basin, including 
the effective use 
of assets and 
mineral inventories.

 Š Assess and act on third 
party opportunities.

 Š Accelerate growth 
through strategic 
partnerships.

12 

—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023

AURELIA METALS

13 
—

OUR FY23 FINANCIAL AND OPERATING  
PERFORMANCE  
—

GROUP FINANCIAL MEASURE

Revenue

EBITDA – statutory 

EBITDA – underlying 

EBITDA margin

Net profit/(loss) after tax – statutory 

Net profit/(loss) after tax – underlying 

Basic earnings per share

Cash flows from operating activities 

Cash flows from investing activities

Cash flows from financial activities and foreign exchange (FX)

Group cash flow

UNIT

A$M

A$M

A$M

A$M

A$M

A$M

A$M

A$M

A$M

A$M

A$M

FY23

369.2

55.8

55.7

15

(52.2)

(37.7)

(4.16)

45.9

(77.4)

(6.8)

(38.3)

FY22

% CHANGE

438.8

166.5

142.9

38

(81.7)

(1.4)

(6.61)

154.1

(131.5)

(20.2)

(16)

(66)

(61)

(60)

36

2,659

37

(70)

41

66

2.5

(1,654)

OUR FY23 PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE  
—

KEY METRIC

Production Volume

Gold

Silver 

Copper 

Lead 

Zinc 

Average Prices Achieved

Gold

Silver

Copper

Lead

Zinc

UNIT

FY23

FY22

% CHANGE

oz

oz

t

t

t

A$/oz

A$/oz

A$/t

A$/t

A$/t

86,254

98,461

352,343

788,840

2,188

18,998

20,548

2,697

34

12,092

3,351

4,493

2,315

3,726

24,266

30,067

2,500

32

13,124

3,032

4,692

1,707

(12)

(55)

(41)

(22)

(32)

8

6

(8)

11

(4)

36

All in Sustaining Cost (AISC) 

A$/oz

Excerpt from pages 5 and 6 of the 'FY23 Financial Results' presentation (30 August 2023) available on the ASX.

14 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OUR MINES: 
PEAK MINE   
—

The New Cobar open-pit, part of the 
Peak Mine complex

METAL

Gold

Silver

Copper 

Lead

Zinc

UNIT

FY23 PRODUCTION

oz

oz

t

t

t

36,279

203,981

2,188

14,416

13,302

Peak Mine is located in the northern Cobar Basin, 
south of Cobar in central-west NSW. The current 
operation started production in 1992.

Aurelia completed the purchase of Peak from New Gold 
in April 2018. Through accelerated mining of the  
high-grade Chronos gold deposit, investment payback  
on the A$59 million purchase price was achieved  
within four months.

The operation comprises two separate polymetallic 
underground mines and an 800ktpa base metals and gold-
processing plant. The plant is supplied with lead-zinc-gold 
and copper-gold ores from several active underground 
mining areas that use open stope mining with backfill. 
Thickened tailings are pumped for deposition to an 
engineered tailings storage facility.

The processing facility enables the treatment of different 
polymetallic ore types to produce separate copper, lead and 
zinc concentrates. Ore is processed in campaigns based on 
the nature of the polymetallic mineralisation mined from the 
different orebodies.

Drilling at Peak Mine and its deposits is currently focused on 
further extensions of the existing orebodies across the north 
and south mines, including Kairos, Peak North, Perseverance 
and Chesney. Additional near-mine drilling is focused on 
evaluating the potential of high-value line-of-lode targets 
between the main deposits.

For further information about the Peak Mine and its FY23 
performance, see pages 88 to 89 and visit our website:  
https://aureliametals.com/peak-mine/

15 
—

AURELIA METALSOUR MINES: 
DARGUES MINE  
—

An aerial view of the Dargues Mine 
process plant

METAL

Gold

UNIT

oz

FY23 PRODUCTION

36,358

Dargues Mine is a gold-mining and milling operation 
in the Southern Tablelands region of NSW, 
approximately 60km southeast of Canberra, which 
Aurelia purchased in late 2020 and successfully 
integrated into our production portfolio during 2021.

Ore is mined using conventional bottom-up longhole 
stoping and trucked from the underground mine to a 
surface stockpile adjacent to the process plant. Stope voids 
are backfilled with cemented hydraulic fill or waste rock. 
Mine access is via a boxcut and decline from the surface.

Ore is treated through three-stage crushing, ball milling, 
flotation and dewatering circuits to produce a gold-rich pyrite 
concentrate that is exported for smelting.

Dargues life-of-mine planning in FY23 indicates the 
completion of onsite mining and processing in 2024. 
Dargues Management has taken steps to ensure the 
strong planned cash contribution from the asset until 
the end of its mine life is realised. 

For further information about the Dargues Mine and its FY23 
performance, see page 90 and visit our website:  
https://aureliametals.com/dargues-mine/ 

16 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OUR MINES: 
HERA SITE   
—

An aerial view of the Hera site process 
plant at night

METAL

Gold

Silver

Lead

Zinc

UNIT

FY23 PRODUCTION

oz

oz

t

t

13,616

148,362

4,582

7,247

Hera site is located approximately 100km southeast 
of Cobar in central-west NSW. In March 2023, the 
last ore from the underground mine was hauled to 
the surface and processed through the plant, and 
Hera’s surface facilities were transitioned to care and 
maintenance in April 2023.

The 455ktpa process plant is equipped with a three-stage 
crushing, gravity gold, base metal flotation and concentrate 
leach circuits. We intend to leverage the established 

infrastructure at our Hera site to process ore from our nearby 
Federation Project. 

Since commissioning in 2014, Hera has produced 3.2 million 
tonnes of ore, supported 180 full time jobs, and contributed 
A$216 million to the local economy.

For further information about Hera and its FY23 
performance, see page 91 and visit our website: 
https://aureliametals.com/hera-mine/

17 
—

AURELIA METALSOUR PROJECTS: 
FEDERATION 
PROJECT  
—

An aerial view of the decline  
at the Federation Project site 

The Federation Project deposit hosts high-grade 
zinc, lead, and gold mineralisation and is located 
approximately 10km south of our Hera site. 

Project development will involve the underground mining 
of the deposit for treatment through established processing 
circuits at our Peak and Hera sites.

The Federation deposit was discovered in April 2019. 
We moved swiftly to progress exploration and infill drilling, 
in conjunction with project evaluation and permitting 
applications, to enable production from this exceptional 
mineral deposit.

In October 2022, we completed the Federation Feasibility 
Study (FS). In conjunction with the FS we announced a 
maiden Ore Reserve of 2.2Mt at 8.9% zinc (Zn), 5.3% lead 
(Pb), 1.4g/t gold (Au), 6g/t silver (Ag), and 0.3% copper (Cu).

On 2 March 2023, Aurelia received Development Consent 
from the NSW Department of Planning and Environment for 
the Federation Project. 

On 13 April 2023, we released an update to the market on the 
Federation Project scope, timeline and capital cost estimate 
to capture opportunities associated with mining operations 
at the nearby Hera site closing and surface facilities 
transitioning to care and maintenance. Compared to the 
October 2022 release of the Federation FS, several valuable 
project enhancements were identified, including:

Improved path to first production

 Š Updated mine design delivers earlier stope ore production.

 Š Initial ore trucked to the Company’s Peak processing plant 
which improves concentrate payabilities by producing 
separate zinc and lead concentrate products.

 Š Restart of the Hera process plant able to be delayed until 

capacity at Peak is fully utilised. 

Lower capital expenditure compared to the FS

 Š Capital expenditure to first production stope ore lower at 
A$76 million (FS: A$88 million) and total growth capital 
lower at A$143 million (FS: A$145 million).

 Š Leveraging existing Hera mining assets and camp 

infrastructure lowers capital spend and de-risks execution.

 Š Improvements have more than offset the impact of 
industry-wide capital cost inflation since the FS.

 Š Deferral of project spend associated with tailings filtration 

and waste backfill plant.

Updated mine design improves efficiency and 
operability

 Š Optimised mine design reduces total development metres.

 Š Shallower decline gradient improves trucking efficiency.

 Š Figure-8 decline design provides better orebody strike 

coverage and improved infill drilling platforms.

A compelling base metals development project and 
significant Aurelia value

 Š Net Present Value (NPV) of A$354 million at spot prices 

(as at 14 March 2023).

 Š Total mill feed of 4.0Mt for 8-year initial production life; 
expected average annual steady state-recovered metal 
production of 45kt zinc, 46kt lead, 1kt copper, 15koz gold 
and 39koz silver.

 Š Long-term fundamentals for zinc remain strong.

 Š The Federation Deposit remains open along strike and at 

depth with substantial potential for resource extension and 
conversion from planned underground and surface drilling.

In May 2023, we secured a funding solution for the Federation 
Project comprising new senior secured financing facilities 
and a A$40 million fully underwritten equity raise.

For further information about our Federation Project, visit our 
website: https://aureliametals.com/federation/

18 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OUR PROJECTS: 
GREAT COBAR  
—

Exploration Geologist, Karl de Groot using a 
handheld X-ray fluorescence analytical tool 
at one of our exploration prospects  

The Great Cobar Project involves the development 
of a satellite base metals and gold deposit, north 
of, and accessible from, the New Cobar mining 
complex at our Peak Mine’s processing facility and is 
approximately 1.5km north of the New Cobar Mine. 

Copper mineralisation was discovered at the Great Cobar 
deposit in 1870 and mined from then until 1919. Modern 
exploration drilling intercepted significant copper-gold and 
zinc-lead-silver mineralisation outside the historic mine 
workings with copper mineralisation identified at depths 
of 1,000 metres (m) below surface.

The Great Cobar deposit remains open both up-plunge 
and down-plunge. Further testing of the extent of 
its mineralisation will be facilitated by underground 
drill platforms that will be accessed from the planned 
mine workings.

A Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) and maiden Ore Reserve was 
released in January 2022. The mine development uses 
a layout that incorporates responses from community 
consultation and information from assessments prepared 
for the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) for the New Cobar 
Complex. Further study works are planned to be completed 
during FY24.

Aurelia has prioritised development of the Federation Project 
and intends to commence mining activities at Great Cobar 
after Federation starts production.

For further information about our Great Cobar Project, visit 
our website: https://aureliametals.com/great-cobar/

19 
—

AURELIA METALSOUR EXPLORATION  
PROSPECTS  
—

Exploration activities at the historic 
Queen Bee mine 

We hold one of the most geologically prospective 
ground positions in Australia and have the expertise 
and capability to discover and convert this 
endowment to unlock exceptional value.

We have a strong record of discovery and are engaged 
in exploration activities that span the breadth of the 
exploration pipeline from early stage reconnaissance to 
advanced targeting. The Exploration Team is well established 
and uses leading edge technology through established 
pathways to research ore bodies and provide the latest advice 
on exploration methodologies and advanced targeting in the 
mineral exploration industry.

Our exploration pipeline in the Cobar Basin encompasses 
the Cobar and Nymagee Districts. Together these include 
in excess of 125 exploration prospects, 21 of which are at 
the advanced drilling stage. In our Braidwood District in the 
Southern Tablelands region of NSW, the exploration pipeline 
consists of more than 20 exploration prospects and six 
prospects at the advanced drilling stage. 

Cobar District drilling 

In March 2023, we confirmed the outcomes of an exploration 
drilling program at the Chesney East, Burrabungie and Queen 
Bee prospects that returned high-grade copper and gold 
results with the potential to extend Peak’s life of mine. 

The prospects evaluated are all located close to Peak 
infrastructure, with the Chesney East Gold Lens just 10m 
and the Burrabungie Lens within 100m of the existing 
underground development. Queen Bee – a historic mine 
which has now been successfully assessed and drilled as a 
maiden drill program – is within 10km of Peak’s infrastructure. 

Induced Polarisation (IP) surveys – Nymagee District

In January 2023, we were pleased to share promising results 
from four recent IP surveys conducted at four prospects in 
the Nymagee District.

All four prospects evaluated – Lancelot, Vaucluse, Piney and 
Lyell-Burge Trig – contain high chargeability levels, including 
90 millivolts per volt (mV/V) at Lancelot, where levels of 
10–15 mV/V typically warrant drill testing.

The results at Lancelot were especially intriguing and have 
significantly upgraded its mineral prospectivity, advancing 
the prospect through our exploration pipeline. Significantly, 
surveys fast-tracked the target definition process, and 
fine-spaced soil sampling will be conducted over the 
prospects in the June FY24 quarter, followed by drill testing 
if results are favourable.

20 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023THE COBAR DISTRICT 
— 

THE NYMAGEE DISTRICT 
— 

THE BRAIDWOOD DISTRICT 
— 

Resource Legend

 Gold

 Copper

 Silver

 Zinc

 Lead

21 
—

AURELIA METALSSUSTAINABILITY  
REPORT  
—

Environmental and Social Responsibility Advisor, 
Abigail Saunders performing environmental 
monitoring activities near the Dargues Mine

22 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 202323 
—

AURELIA METALSOUR APPROACH TO SUSTAINABILITY  
—

Building and maintaining a trusted, sustainable, and beneficial 
presence in the areas where we operate is essential 
to Aurelia’s success.

Our approach to sustainability is aligned with our Vision and 
Values and aims to deliver business and stakeholder value 
across all aspects of our operations and functions from 
exploration to closure. 

Sustainability is embedded within our business through our 
commitment to:

 Š protecting the health and safety of our employees, 

contractors, and host communities

 Š minimising our environmental impact, conserving and 

enhancing biodiversity, using resources such as water and 
energy efficiently, and progressively rehabilitating land in 
preparation for eventual closure

 Š building resilience to climate change risks and minimising 

and managing greenhouse gas emissions and other 
climate change impacts

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 
were endorsed in 2015 and are aimed at eliminating poverty, 
protecting the environment, and providing a shared blueprint 
for peace and prosperity for people and the planet by 2030. 

We have mapped our sustainability programs and 
performance to the SDGs within the GRI Content Index.

The Financial Stability Board created the Taskforce on 
Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) in 2015. 
The TCFD includes recommendations on voluntary climate-
related financial risk disclosures that provide investors, 
lenders, insurers, regulators, policy makers and other 
stakeholders in the financial markets climate-related 
information useful to decision-making.

We have begun the process of aligning our climate strategy 
and disclosures to International Sustainability Standards 
Board's (ISSB) disclosure standards, which are aligned to the 
recommendations of the TCFD.

 Š recognising and respecting the deep connection First 

Nations Peoples have with the land and operating in a way 
that protects their cultural heritage

MATERIAL TOPICS 
—

 Š building trusting, transparent and long-term relationships 

with our communities

 Š contributing positively to our communities through 

programs that respect their aspirations

 Š respecting and promoting human rights and actively 

managing modern slavery risks

 Š applying ethical and transparent business practices

We regularly engage with our key internal and external 
stakeholders to identify the issues most important to them. 
An overview of our approach to stakeholder engagement can 
be found on page 32.

In developing this Sustainability section of our 2023 Annual 
Report, we focused our disclosures on the potential risks 
and opportunities that could most impact the business and 
influence the assessments and decisions of our stakeholders.

 Š complying with applicable laws, regulations, licences 

We did this by:

and commitments.

To achieve our sustainability objectives, we recognise the 
need to continually improve, understand, benchmark, 
and address emerging issues that are important for ourselves 
and our stakeholders.

Our approach to managing performance in these areas 
includes risk assessment, development and implementation 
of plans, objectives, targets, policies, standards and 
procedures that are supported by management systems, 
leadership development, training and guidance.

 Š undertaking a materiality survey which was sent to 

our employees, Community Consultative Committees, 
key suppliers and Board of Directors

 Š reviewing our material company risks

 Š reviewing stakeholder expectations and emerging risks

 Š engaging with industry bodies and other experts

 Š benchmarking peer reports

 Š reviewing internationally recognised reporting frameworks.

This Sustainability section of our 2023 Annual Report has 
been prepared with reference to internationally recognised 
reporting frameworks.

This Sustainability section of our 2023 Annual Report 
describes our management approach, programs and 
performance for our material topics.

GRI is an independent international organisation that has 
established the leading global framework and standards for 
sustainability reporting.

A GRI Content Index begins on page 59 of this Annual Report.

The Aurelia Board, via our Sustainability and Risk Committee, 
has reviewed the outcomes of our materiality assessment 
and approved the sustainability content of this 2023 
Annual Report.

24 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023FY23 MATERIAL ISSUES  
—

E
C
N
A
M
R
O
F
R
E
P
Y
T
N
U
M
M
O
C

I

N

E

M

N

O

V I R

N

E

E 

C

N

A

M

R

O

F

R

E

L  P

A

T

  Climate Change
  Land and Biodiversity
  Water
  Tailings and Waste Rock
  Rehabilitation 
and Closure

G

O

VERN

A

N

CE

  Governance
Structure

  Operating with Integrity
  Risk Management
  Management Systems
  Stakeholder Engagement
  Planning and
Strategy

  Community 
Investment 
and Development

  First Nations Engagement
  Project Approval Engagement
  Grievance 

Management

MATERIAL
ISSUES

Economic value generated
Economic value distributed

  Safety Culture
  Fatal Hazard and 
Critical Controls
  Contractor Management
  Health and Wellbeing

  Retaining talent   
  Diversity, equity 
and Inclusion

  Training and Development
  Remuneration linked 

to performance

HEALTH A

N

D SAFETY PERFOR

M

A

N

CE

E 

C

N

A

M

R

O

F

R

E

E  P

L

P

O

E

P

I

I

N
O
T
U
B
R
T
N
O
C
C
M
O
N
O
C
E

I

The Peak Mine processing plant at dusk

25 
—

AURELIA METALS 
 
GOVERNANCE   
—

(left to right) Emergency Services Officer, Russell 
Wawatai and General Counsel and Company 
Secretary, Rochelle Carey walking towards the coarse 
ore stockpile at the Peak Mine

We remain committed to achieving our environmental, 
social and governance (ESG) objectives and targets in 
a progressive, sustainable, and respectful manner.

Our strong focus on governance and commitment to our 
stakeholders comes from a clear appreciation that our 
actions are on behalf of our shareholders.

Our aim is to instil an ‘act as an owner’ mindset, where 
everyone is working towards a common goal in the best 
interest of the business, shareholders and stakeholders.

GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE 
— 

The Board of Directors (the ‘Board’) is the highest 
governance body within Aurelia’s governance structure. 
Our Board operates under the roles and responsibilities 
outlined in the Board Charter, which is regularly reviewed and 
available on our website.

The role of the Board is to represent and serve the interests 
of shareholders, with a commitment to delivering strong 
value to all stakeholders, including the communities 
where we operate. Fundamental to these activities is 
our contribution as a trusted, valued and sustainable 
mine operator.

The following committees support the Board:

 Š Audit

 Š Sustainability and Risk

 Š Remuneration and Nomination.

The responsibility and authority of each committee is 
outlined in the Committee Charters which are available on 
our website: https://aureliametals.com/about/corporate-
governance/

The functions of the Board Committees do not relieve the 
Board from any of its responsibilities.

The Board has delegated certain defined authorities to the 
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer to provide for 
the efficient operation of the business within an appropriate 
framework of control and risk management.

The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer has the 
authority to delegate certain authorities, as set out in the 
Delegated Authorities Manual which has been approved by 
the Board.

The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer prepares 
and recommends the Company strategy to be approved 
by the Board, and is then responsible for execution of the 
strategy within agreed risk tolerances, Company policies 
and the governance framework.

26 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023SUSTAINABILITY AND RISK COMMITTEE 

The Sustainability and Risk Committee assists the Board in 
matters pertaining to sustainability in the Company including 
safety, health, climate and environment, community relations, 
and enterprise risk management.

In particular, the Committee is responsible for satisfying itself 
that measures, systems and controls are in place to manage 
sustainability issues and incidents that may have material 
strategic, business and reputational implications for Aurelia 
and our stakeholders.

Relevant General Managers and Executives are invited to 
attend meetings of the Committee and risk owners are 
required to present their sustainability risk matters and 
mitigation plans.

As part of its work program, the Sustainability and 
Risk Committee invites representatives from external 
stakeholder groups to present to them in relation to 
current environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues 
and/or trends.

In FY23, the Board and Committee arranged for EY to deliver 
presentations on the changing ESG landscape and the new 
ISSB requirements, and Deloitte on its Tracking the Trends 
2023 Report.

THE AURELIA WAY

The Aurelia Way is our Code of Conduct, which encompasses 
our vision and values and guides all aspects of the business, 
from the policies and standards we apply to how we conduct 
ourselves and approach day-to-day decisions. 

It sets boundaries to help guide employees and contractors 
to exercise good judgment and describes how we should 
interact internally with our colleagues, as well as externally 
with our stakeholders and is structured around the 
following themes: 

 Š The purpose of The Aurelia Way and how it applies to 

employees and contractors and how Aurelia will respond 
to breaches.

 Š Workplace behaviours articulating expectations which 
include health and safety, respect for people, employee 
performance and unacceptable behaviour.

 Š Sustainability covering environment, community and 

human rights matters.

 Š Operating with integrity addressing conflicts of interest, 
bribery and corruption and working in accordance with 
the law.

 Š Communicating externally encompassing disclosures to 
the market (ASX), shareholders, media and working with 
government agencies.

The Aurelia Way is incorporated into inductions for all new 
employees and contractors and within the terms for any new 
and existing suppliers.

We expect employees to carry out due diligence on potential 
and existing business partners and suppliers to confirm they 
conduct their business lawfully, that they are aware of their 
obligations under The Aurelia Way and that they operate in a 
consistent manner.

We encourage employees, contractors, and stakeholders to 
feel safe to come forward without fear of retaliation to report 
conduct they reasonably believe may be illegal, unethical 
or inconsistent with our values and standards. There are 
a number of options for reporting unacceptable conduct, 
including:

 Š raising it with a direct manager or supervisor

 Š elevating it to the next level of management

 Š contacting the Human Resources Team, Legal Team or 

Whistleblower Protection Officers

 Š reporting it through our confidential independent external 

Whistleblower service, Stopline.

The Board approved The Aurelia Way in September 2021, and 
it is available on our website.

WHISTLEBLOWERS

Stopline, our appointed external confidential Whistleblower 
service provider can be contacted 24/7 as well as trained 
Whistleblower contact officers within our business.

We encourage employees and stakeholders to speak up 
at the earliest opportunity where a person has reasonable 
grounds to suspect misconduct. Our Whistleblowers Standard 
outlines the protections available to whistleblowers and 
the process that will be followed when a disclosure is made, 
to encourage people to come forward with their concerns. 
All disclosures made under this Standard are treated 
seriously and are carefully considered.

The underground conveyor  
at the Peak Mine

27 
—

 ŠwAURELIA METALSOPERATING WITH INTEGRITY 
— 

We work with business partners and suppliers who share our 
commitment to safety, human rights, working ethically and 
lawfully and who behave in accordance with The Aurelia Way.

We also prioritise responsible local procurement of goods 
and services that contribute to the economic and social 
development of communities where we operate.

Our business partners and suppliers play an important 
role in our success. We therefore choose whom we work 
with carefully.

HUMAN RIGHTS AND MODERN SLAVERY 

Aurelia supports and respects human rights and works to 
ensure we operate honestly and ethically to identify, assess 
and reduce the risk of modern slavery in our operations and 
supply chains, as outlined in The Aurelia Way.

In doing this, we recognise that human rights apply to every 
person across the globe regardless of their background. 
We see this as a fundamental element to our social 
responsibility and the sustainability of our operations.

We have identified the following aspects of our supply chain 
may expose us to higher modern slavery risks. These include:

 Š overseas manufacturing and fabrication (uniforms and 

personal protective equipment)

ANTI-BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION

 Š electronics (computers and mobile phones)

Aurelia is committed to conducting its business ethically and 
in accordance with our vision and values and The Aurelia Way.

 Š facilities management (cleaning, accommodation camp 

management and food services)

We take a zero-tolerance approach to bribery and corruption, 
as set out in the Anti-Bribery and Corruption Standard, 
which was reviewed and updated in FY23 and is available on 
our website. The Standard is communicated to all employees 
and contractors as part of The Aurelia Way training.

Information on limits for gifts, hospitality and entertainment, 
and detailed guidance on deciding if and when this may 
be appropriate, are outlined in the Standard and within 
The Aurelia Way.

In FY23, there were:

 Š no confirmed incidents of corruption

 Š no employees dismissed for corruption

 Š transport and logistics (including shipping)

 Š construction.

Some of the key actions Aurelia has taken to assess and 
address modern slavery risks in our operations and supply 
chains include:

 Š Developing and rolling out The Aurelia Way and specific 
modern slavery training, which includes expectations 
to uphold human rights and identify and report modern 
slavery exposure.

 Š Encouraging employees, contractors, suppliers and 
stakeholders to report any human rights or modern 
slavery incidents pursuant to our Whistleblower Standard.

 Š no incidents where contracts were terminated or not 

 Š Undertaking a Group-level modern slavery 

renewed due to corruption

risk assessment.

 Š no cases regarding corruption being brought against the 

 Š Establishing a Modern Slavery Working Group, which 

Company or its employees.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 

Aurelia requires that all actual, perceived or potential 
conflicts of interest be disclosed in writing. Other expected 
actions include withdrawing from decision-making that 
creates, or could be perceived to create, a conflict of interest.

ANTI-COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOUR

No matter which country we operate in, or the customers and 
suppliers we transact with, we will support competition and 
not engage in anti-competitive behaviour.

In FY23, there were no legal actions pending or completed 
against Aurelia in relation to anti-competitive behaviour, 
or violations of anti-trust or monopoly legislation.

meets quarterly to identify, monitor and address modern 
slavery risks in our business. The Working Group includes 
representatives from head office and site, Legal, Finance, 
Procurement, Sustainability and Human Resources Teams.

 Š Undertaking supply chain due diligence based on 

expenditure, product/service type, sector/industry and 
geographical location.

 Š Strengthening modern slavery compliance and reporting 
obligations in all tenders, contracts and new supplier 
onboarding processes.

We aim for continual improvement in our actions to assess 
and address modern slavery risks in our operations and 
supply chains.

Aurelia’s published Modern Slavery Statements are available 
on our website: https://aureliametals.com/investors/
company-reporting/

28 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023SECURITY MANAGEMENT

TAX GOVERNANCE AND COMPLIANCE 

Aurelia operates within Australian jurisdictions and engages 
with the relevant state and federal tax authorities for all tax 
compliance matters.

We maintain thorough and transparent engagement with 
tax authorities.

Aurelia’s Board Tax Policy ensures our approach to taxation is 
principled, transparent and sustainable in the long term.

The Board endorses the following principles governing 
its approach:

 Š Commitment to ensure full compliance with all statutory 
obligations, and full disclosure to revenue authorities.

 Š Management of tax affairs in a proactive manner that 

seeks to maximise shareholder value, while operating in 
accordance with the law.

 Š Maintenance of documented policies and procedures in 

relation to tax risk management.

 Š Sustaining engagement with revenue authorities and 

actively considering the implications of tax planning for 
Aurelia’s wider reputation.

 Š Aurelia tolerates a low level of tax risk (which is inherent in 
taxation matters). Tax will be managed with the objective 
that all tax liabilities properly due under the law are 
correctly recorded, accounted for and paid.

TRADING IN AURELIA’S SHARES

Aurelia has a Securities Trading Policy which applies to all 
our employees, contractors and consultants and is available 
on our website. The Policy exists to minimise the risk of 
actual insider trading and avoid the risk of perception of 
insider trading.

Anyone with knowledge of price sensitive information 
that is not generally available is prohibited from dealing in 
Aurelia shares.

Directors, senior executives and certain employees who 
are in a position that provides them with ready access to 
confidential and price sensitive information about Aurelia 
are termed ‘designated employees’. These employees have 
additional protocols governing their dealing in Aurelia shares, 
including needing prior approval to trade and only being able 
to trade during designated trading windows as defined in 
Aurelia’s Securities Trading Policy.

Aurelia requires contractors engaged to provide security 
services to appropriately address the human rights aspects of 
security services. Our contracted secure transport provider is 
a founding member of the UN Global Compact in support of 
the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

PROCESS TO REMEDIATE  
NEGATIVE IMPACTS

Any reported breaches of The Aurelia Way are taken 
seriously and dealt with on a case-by-case basis and in a 
timely manner.

The course of action will depend on the nature and severity 
of the breach and may include disciplinary action, including 
dismissal in some cases and for matters of a breach of law 
(criminal or civil), referral to relevant authorities.

COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS 
AND REGULATIONS

Aurelia’s Directors, employees and business partners are 
required to comply with the laws in the state and country 
in which they are working and acknowledge that a breach 
can result in serious consequences for the Company 
and our employees. This could include fines, criminal 
and civil penalties, sanctions, imprisonment and/or 
reputational damage.

Aurelia experienced no material environmental, community 
or heritage incidents and received no fines or penalty 
infringement notices in FY23. However, an environmental 
incident occurred at the Dargues Mine in July 2023 regarding 
a mine water tank overflowing into a nearby creek. A Clean 
Up Notice was issued to Big Island Mining Pty Ltd in July 
2023 with respect to the incident. 

There were several minor non-compliances to development 
consent conditions during the year, all of which were reported 
to the relevant authorities as required. 

WORKING WITH GOVERNMENT AGENCIES 

Aurelia works closely with government officials in the 
jurisdictions where we operate, and regularly engages with 
them on matters that affect our business. We maintain sound 
professional relationships with governments, their agencies 
and employees, and always act in a respectful, honest, 
transparent and ethical manner. We always cooperate with 
government enquiries and investigations.

In accordance with Company guidelines, under our 
Delegation of Authority Manual and Anti Bribery and 
Corruption Standard, no political donations in cash or in-kind 
are to be made. Employees may participate as individuals in 
political processes provided it is made clear that in doing so, 
they are not representing the Company.

No financial assistance has been received or requested from 
federal or state governments.

29 
—

AURELIA METALSThe following factors are taken into consideration when 
identifying material risks:

 Š Has the risk been evaluated with a risk rating of ‘extreme’ 

in the Aurelia Risk Management Framework?

 Š Would the risk require public disclosure?

 Š Could the risk substantially influence the assessment and 

decisions of stakeholders?

 Š Could the risk materially change the underlying value 

of the business?

 Š Would the risk impact the Company meeting its business 

strategy and objectives?

Material risks in the Group Risk Register are also 
allocated to the Board or one of the Board Committees 
for annual oversight. This includes the review of the risk 
management framework and monitoring of Group material 
risks to confirm appropriate processes have been applied 
to identify, evaluate and control risks as far as reasonably 
practical, and consideration is given for further mitigation 
from the Board’s experience.

Material business risks are further discussed in the 
‘Operations and Financial Review’ section of this Annual 
Report on page 99.

In FY23, we updated our Enterprise Risk Management 
Framework, which is aligned to ISO 31000 and includes 
our Risk Management Policy, Standard and Procedure. 
The Risk Management Standard outlines Aurelia’s minimum 
requirements for the systematic identification, assessment 
and management of risks and opportunities.

RISK MANAGEMENT 
—

Risk Management at Aurelia refers to the management 
of potentially adverse effects, as well as the realisation 
of potential opportunities.

Risk management is embedded throughout the business 
from assessing growth opportunities through exploration, 
mergers and acquisitions, to development, operation, and 
mine closure.

Our approach to hazard identification, risk assessment and 
incident investigation is governed by our Board and the 
Sustainability and Risk, and Audit Committees. This high 
level of monitoring provides confidence to our internal and 
external stakeholders that Aurelia’s material and significant 
risks are identified and effectively managed.

Aurelia’s Group Risk Register categorises risks and 
opportunities in the following four broad topics:

 Š Operational, including Compliance and Approvals, Health 

and Safety, Environment, Projects, and Community.

 Š Strategic, including Capital Allocation, Industry, and 

Strategy and Delivery.

 Š Financial, including Commodity Prices, Credit Risks, 

Financial Operations and Liquidity.

 Š Corporate, including Supply Chain, Fraud and Corruption, 
Information Technology, Human Resources and Legal.

For each risk, control strategies and improvement 
opportunities are identified and accountability for their 
management is assigned to a risk owner.

Recent improvements to our risk management framework 
include formalising monthly risk and improvement action 
reviews with risk owners and the Senior Leadership Team.

Material risks are those that threaten the success of Aurelia’s 
business and/or could substantially impact the Company’s 
ability to create or preserve value over the short, medium 
or long term. 

30 
—

An aerial view of the Peak 
Mine tailings storage facility 
during the construction of 
the stage 5 lift

ANNUAL REPORT 2023The Risk Management Standard is supplemented by Aurelia’s 
Risk Management Procedure which provides guidance on the 
four levels of risk assessments undertaken at Aurelia:

Level 1: Take 5s

A pre-task assessment to be undertaken by individuals 
in the field to consider hazards associated with the task 
at hand. A Take 5 is required at shift commencement, 
before each task, and when the work environment or other 
conditions change.

Level 2: Job Hazard Analysis

A pre-task assessment identifying job steps, relevant hazards, 
and controls. A Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) is undertaken 
when a Take 5 cannot address the risk adequately, for team 
activities, and/or where a standard operating procedure 
is not available. A JHA is reviewed by everyone involved, 
or likely to be involved, in a task.

Level 3: Formal risk assessments

Formal, team-based, qualitative risk assessments are completed 
for: the Aurelia Group, operations, departments, major projects, 
life-of-mine planning and budgeting, major modifications of 
plant and equipment (including capital projects), mine closure, 
entry into new materials and/or different jurisdictions and 
mergers and acquisitions. Level 3 moves beyond the task in 
relation to health, safety, environmental and community risk, 
to consider financial, human resources, business continuity 
and other strategic business risks.

Level 4: Quantitative and other detailed 
Risk Assessments

Quantitative risk assessments may be required for scenarios 
that have significant consequences where a more detailed 
understanding of the controls and effectiveness are required.

MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 
— 

Our Health, Safety and Environment Management Systems 
are informed by our Risk Management Framework. They build 
upon our Vision, Values, Strategy and policies and are 
supported by The Aurelia Way, our Rules to Live By, and 
Green Rules which set clear and unambiguous minimum 
expectations around high potential risk incidents and guide 
individual behaviours. See our website for a list of our Rules 
to Live By: https://aureliametals.com/sustainability/safety. 
The Green Rules are also available on our website:  
https://aureliametals.com/sustainability/environment/

We have established standards, management plans 
and procedures – supported by work instructions and 
task-specific risk assessments – to guide how work 
should be undertaken in a safe and environmentally 
responsible manner. 

Prior to visiting or beginning work at one of our sites, 
employees and contractors undergo an induction program 
targeted to the level of risk associated with their activities. 
General site inductions inform the workforce about the 
risks and controls associated with activities on site, and the 
behaviours we expect of them. Additional inductions and 
training are provided to those who access higher risk areas, 
including our processing mills and underground environment, 
or who will be undertaking higher risk work.

We continued to improve our Health, Safety and Environment 
Management Systems this year, with the further development 
and enhancement of Fatal and Catastrophic Hazard 
Standards and Critical Control Verification programs.

INCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS 
—

Incidents are fully investigated in line with our Incident and 
Hazard Management Procedure. Under this Procedure, 
incidents are broadly classified into the following categories:

 Š safety (eg. injuries, occupational illness, near misses, 

policy/procedure breaches)

 Š equipment/damage

 Š environmental

 Š non-compliance

 Š production loss

 Š community/reputation

 Š inappropriate workplace behaviour (eg. sexual harassment 

and assault)

 Š security.

The depth of incident investigation is dependent on the 
severity of the incident, with increasing depth correlating to 
increased actual or potential consequence.

Incidents or near misses with an actual consequence of 
level 3 (moderate) and above, or a potential consequence of 
level 4 (major) and above – also known as ‘High Potential Risk 
Incidents’ (HPRIs) – are investigated using the Incident Cause 
Analysis Method (ICAM).

Employees trained in the ICAM methodology are called on to 
lead or assist in incident investigations as required. 

For highly sensitive and/or serious investigations the 
Company has used external (independent) investigators.

Outcomes of HPRI investigations are overseen by Aurelia’s 
Senior Management Taskforce for Significant Incidents, 
including verification that HPRI actions have been 
appropriately closed out. Events that go to the Taskforce are 
also presented to the Sustainability and Risk Committee, with 
some more severe or complex incidents also being presented 
to the Board.

In FY23, six HPRIs required investigation (FY22: 11).

31 
—

AURELIA METALS 
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 
—

Fundamental to our Vision and Values is being accepted 
as a transparent and trusted partner, and successfully 
establishing long-term relationships with all our stakeholders. 
We do this by respectfully and openly engaging with our 
stakeholders through various forums and the media.

We actively attempt to understand the needs and concerns 
of our stakeholders to better inform our decision-making. 
We share information about our operations and performance 
to ensure our stakeholders are kept up to date.

STAKEHOLDER GROUPS

HOW WE ENGAGE 

KEY TOPICS OF ENGAGEMENT

Employees and contractors

Emails, site and Group-wide newsletters, 
noticeboards, meetings, General Manager 
State of the Nation meetings, Managing 
Director and Chief Executive Officer 
communications, social media

 Š Business performance

 Š Development of Business Plans and performance 

against the plan

 Š Sustainability management and performance

 Š Employee recognition and reward

 Š Key operational and project milestones

 Š Inductions, Vision and Values, expectations, 

The Aurelia Way, Rules to Live By, Green Rules, 
core Company policies and standards

 Š Community engagement and sponsorships

Government

Meetings, site visits, emails, briefings, 
industry associations (NSW Minerals Council)

 Š Regulatory and legal compliance

 Š Project approvals and modifications

Communities

Community Consultation Committees, 
complaints and grievance mechanisms, 
website, employee visits, community 
noticeboards, social media

Shareholders and investors

Annual Reports, quarterly reports, website, 
investor briefings, conference calls, ASX 
announcements, Annual General Meetings, 
social media

 Š Sustainability management and performance

 Š Voluntary Planning Agreements

 Š Community investment

 Š Operational and project milestones

 Š New projects 

 Š Sustainability management and performance

 Š Investment in communities

 Š Cultural heritage consultation and surveys

 Š Direct engagement through Town Hall meetings 

on new projects

 Š Life-of-mine planning 

 Š Mine and project milestones 

 Š Operating performance

 Š Financial performance and balance sheet

 Š Updates to the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve

 Š Sustainability management and performance

 Š Corporate governance

 Š Community sponsorships and donations

 Š Life-of-mine planning 

 Š Mine and project milestones 

Suppliers 

Meetings, contractual agreements

 Š Sustainability requirements

Customers

Meetings, engagement, site visits, 
market tenders

 Š Modern Slavery requirements

 Š Contract conditions

 Š Updates to the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve 

 Š Regulatory compliance

 Š Sustainability management and performance

32 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023With FY23 being a year of transition for the Group, the 
strategic plan developed for the year was deprioritised in 
favour of improved cost control through the Working Smarter 
Program and organisational transformation. 

For FY24, our approach to strategic planning has changed, 
with internal facilitation of business planning sessions 
commencing with the creation of the revised Strategy on a 
Page by the Executive and Senior Leadership. This strategy 
in turn provided guidance to the creation of FY24 business 
plans for our operations which detail the critical tasks and 
tactical projects to be completed to ensure delivery against 
the FY24 budget.

ANNUAL BUSINESS 
PLANNING CYCLE 
—

Aurelia has a defined annual business planning cycle that 
culminates in the development of objectives and targets at 
the beginning of each financial year. These are aligned to the 
Company’s annual plan and long-term strategy.

The annual business planning cycle includes:

 Š Material Risk and Opportunity Review

 Š Strategy (developed by executive management 

and approved by the Board)

 Š Life-of-mine planning

 Š Budget, review of performance, and annual Business 

Plan development.

The annual planning cycle ensures the Group strategy and 
critical tasks for the annual plan and budget are cascaded 
down throughout the business. In this way everyone, from the 
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer down to each 
employee in the organisation, knows what is expected and 
how they contribute to the plan.

Sunrise at the Peak process plant

33 
—

AURELIA METALSCASE STUDY:  
WORKING SMARTER  
PROGRAM 
— 

(left to right) Underground Truck 
Operator, Peter Summerfield, Loadscan 
Consultant, Brandon Moynihan and 
Bogger Operator, Steven Blom following 
calibration of the Loadscan scanner at 
New Cobar: a Working Smarter Program 
initiative that increases productivity and 
supports safe production

In FY23, a key focus for Aurelia was returning 
our business to operational certainty following 
underwhelming performance at the onset of the year. 
Recognising our employees know the business the 
best, we called on them to help identify cost reduction 
opportunities as well as process and business 
efficiency improvements that would help us find value 
in the margin through the Working Smarter Program. 

Launched in November 2022, the Program empowered 
and incentivised employees to log initiatives via QR codes, 
suggestions boxes and/or paper forms at our worksites. 
Once submitted, initiatives were moved along a five-stage 
evaluation process, with stage one being the ‘pipeline’ or 
identification stage. All initiatives were then moved to stage 
two, or ‘investigating’ and were reviewed using a value versus 
ease of implementation assessment. 

From there, the ‘prioritisation’ process identified highest 
value initiatives, noting value wasn’t solely determined by 
cost savings, and those which increased efficiency and/or 
maximised returns were also given priority. 

Finally, actions were planned for initiatives that were 
approved to move to the ‘executing’ phase and were then 
‘banked’ when completed. Sitting across the process was 
‘stage zero’, or initiatives the Working Smarter Committee 
identified as needing no further analysis and were moved 
immediately to execution. 

When the Program wrapped in July 2023, more than  
$A25.6 million in cost savings and efficiency equivalent 
value had been banked. This included approximately $15.8 
million in ongoing savings due to sustainable changes in 
operating methods, processes, or equipment. The outcome 
far and above exceeded our Executive Leadership Team’s 
(ELT) expectations, having set what was thought to be a very 
optimistic initial target of A$24 million.

Principal – Production Systems, Simon Young – who also 
doubled as the Working Smarter Committee Lead – spoke 
about the response to the Program. 

“In the eight months Working Smarter ran across our 
business, 601 initiatives were logged, 220 of which were 
completed and banked. The Working Smarter Committee and 
the ELT were overjoyed at this response,” Simon said. 

“One of the keys to the success of the Program was its 
overarching ethos: ‘that’s how it’s always been done’ doesn’t 
necessarily mean it’s the best way to do things anymore. 
It encouraged all ideas, some simple and small, others large 
and complex, from employees across the Group. 

“The Working Smarter Program is testament to what Aurelia 
can achieve when we invest in the knowledge of our people 
and empower them to ‘own’ their processes and shape the 
future of our Company. If the Working Smarter Program is a 
snapshot of what we can achieve when they come together, 
I am confident the future remains bright for Aurelia,” 
Simon concluded. 

34 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023SUSTAINABILITY PLAN 
—

Aurelia has developed a rolling three-year plan to guide our efforts to improve our approach and performance across three 
pillars of Sustainability. The plan has been approved by our Board and informs annual business planning, particularly for Health 
Safety Environment and Community (HSEC) and People and Organisation projects that require a coordinated effort across 
the business.

1. SUSTAINABILITY 
GOVERNANCE

2. ENVIRONMENTAL 
PERFORMANCE

3. SOCIAL  
PERFORMANCE

Incorporating Board oversight via the 
Sustainability and Risk Committee, 
establishment of Aurelia’s risk 
management framework, development 
and implementation of standards and 
systems to ensure we have a culture 
that recognises the importance of 
sustainability to business success.

Addressing key environmental risks, 
including legal compliance, climate 
change, land and biodiversity, 
water, tailings and waste rock, and 
rehabilitation and closure.

Managing key social risks across 
the people (diversity and inclusion, 
training and development), health and 
safety (fatal hazards, legal compliance, 
and health and wellbeing) and 
community (stakeholder engagement, 
social investment and cultural 
heritage) disciplines.

A Peron's Tree frog, photo taken at the Peak Mine site

35 
—

AURELIA METALSFY23 OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND PERFORMANCE 
—

At the Annual General Meeting in November 2022, our 
Board set an agenda which included targets to turn around 
operational performance and cash management. 

As a result, a number of the FY23 targets were deprioritised 
and not completed. Performance against our FY23 
sustainability targets is summarised in the table below.

Our key focus to return to operational certainty meant that 
FY23 was a year of rebalance to restore shareholder value. 

FY23 OBJECTIVES, TARGETS AND PERFORMANCE

  Not achieved    

  In progress     

  Complete

OBJECTIVES

RISK

TARGETS

PERFORMANCE / ACHIEVEMENTS

Maintaining an effective risk management 
framework is essential for the protection 
and creation of business value. 

 Š Three Fatal or Catastrophic 
Hazard Standards audited

 Š External audits conducted against 3 (three) 
Fatal Hazard Standards at operating sites in 
FY23 (1 at Hera, 2 at Dargues, 3 at Peak)

SAFETY

Safety underpins everything we do. We are 
committed to the health and wellbeing of 
our workforce.

 Š Zero fatalities

 Š ≤ 6.6 TRIFR 

 Š Zero fatalities

 Š 5.13 TRIFR*

 Š >90% of actions to address 

 Š 100% of actions from identified serious 

serious weaknesses identified 
during Critical Control 
Verifications completed by 
due date 

weaknesses were completed by the due date

PEOPLE

We value our people. A diverse, 
high-performing, engaged and empowered 
workforce is key to our success.

COMMUNITY

As a part of our local communities, 
we actively engage to foster trusted, 
transparent and respectful long-term 
relationships to create enduring value and 
protect cultural heritage. 

CLIMATE CHANGE

We are committed to a future where 
average temperatures do not rise by 
more than two degrees through building 
resilience to climate change and 
minimising greenhouse gas emissions. 

ENVIRONMENT

Our commitment to environmental 
stewardship focuses on biodiversity 
conservation, efficient use of water and 
resources, and minimising unintended 
pollution to land, water and air. 

 Š 7% improvement in the 

 Š No engagement survey completed in FY23; full 

Sustainable Engagement Score

survey planned for FY24

 Š ≤20% voluntary turnover

 Š Due to the closure of Hera mine and company 

 Š 20% improvement in female 

uncertainty turnover rose to 35.9%

representation in the workforce

 Š 5.6% year-on-year improvement to 22.7% 

female participation

 Š 70% of approved social 

investment actions completed

 Š Finalise Climate Change Position 
including science-based targets

 Š Social investment program not developed due 
to focus on operational performance; however, 
we have an active community grants program, 
which contributed A$0.2M to our local 
communities in FY23

 Š Climate Change Position not finalised. Aurelia 
recognises climate change is an issue and 
we are committed to reducing emissions 
through projects such as the solar farm at the 
Federation Project.

 Š ≤3 Recordable Environmental 

 Š 2.91 REIFR

Incident Frequency Rate (REIFR) 

 Š Progressive rehabilitation projects are ongoing

 Š 100% of available land 

rehabilitated in accordance with 
site rehabilitation plans

* Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) measured by per million hours worked.

36 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023FY24 OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS

OBJECTIVES

RISK

TARGETS

Maintaining an effective risk management 
framework is essential for the protection 
and creation of business value. 

SAFETY

Safety underpins everything we do. We are 
committed to the health and wellbeing of 
our workforce.

PEOPLE

We value our people. A diverse, 
high- performing, engaged and 
empowered workforce is key to 
our success.

COMMUNITY

As a part of our local communities, 
we actively engage to foster trusted, 
transparent and respectful long-term 
relationships to create enduring value and 
protect cultural heritage. 

CLIMATE CHANGE

We are committed to a future where 
average temperatures do not rise by 
more than two degrees through building 
resilience to climate change and 
minimising greenhouse gas emissions. 

ENVIRONMENT

Our commitment to environmental 
stewardship focuses on biodiversity 
conservation, efficient use of water and 
resources, and minimising unintended 
pollution to land, water and air. 

 Š Active risk management and review embedded across sites, with monthly risk reviews

 Š Zero fatalities

 Š ≤ 4.6 TRIFR

 Š All Fatal Hazard Standards and their CCVs reviewed and simplified

 Š Employee engagement survey completed by end FY24

 Š 10% improvement in the Training and Development category under the Employee 

Engagement Survey

 Š Close out 80% of priority actions under the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Strategy

 Š 25% female participation across the workforce

 Š Develop priority People Standards for the Group

 Š Develop and implement Community and Engagement Standards for the Group

 Š Continue to actively participate in our communities through donations and community 

support, targeting A$0.15M in FY24

 Š Development of a Reflect Reconciliation Action Plan 

 Š Complete a gap analysis of Aurelia’s climate change commitments and reporting capability 
against International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) which fully incorporate the 
recommendations of the Taskforce on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)

 Š Roll out Environment Performance Standards across the Group

 Š Verify performance against four Environmental Performance Standards 

37 
—

AURELIA METALSECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION   
—

Aurelia acknowledges how important it is to share the value 
of the resources we extract with our stakeholders. We’re open 
and transparent about our economic contribution and, 
despite cost pressures throughout FY23, have continued to 
give back to the local, state and national economies in which 
we operate.

Tender and vendor selection processes for material supply 
and service contracts include consideration of ESG exposures 
and mitigation measures implemented by the supplier.

Direct economic value generated ................... A$369.2M

 Š Economic value retained  ............................................ (A$26.6M)

Economic value distributed  ............................  A$395.8M

 Š Operational costs and other  ....................................... A$297.3M

 Š Community investments and expenditure  ............... A$0.2M

 Š Employee benefits  ..........................................................  A$62.4M

 Š Payments to governments (net)  ................................  A$30.2M

 Š Payments to providers of capital  ................................... A$5.7M

An aerial view of the Peak Mine process plant

In FY23, there were no instances of negative ESG impacts 
being identified in the supply chain which resulted in the 
termination of business relationships.

In FY23, we generated more than A$369 million in royalties, 
taxes, employee wages and dividends.

($26.6M)

$395.8M

$297.3M

$62.4M
$30.2M

$5.7M

$0.2M

38 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023PEOPLE PERFORMANCE  
—

Aurelia recognises superior organisational performance 
can only be achieved through the people who call our 
workplace theirs.

including career breaks, compact work weeks, and hybrid 
rosters that enabled employees to work remotely. 

 Š We introduced a tailored Retention Scheme for employees 

In a tight labour market, the challenge to attract, recruit 
and retain high-calibre employees to meet our current and 
future business needs is significant. This means our efforts to 
engage, energise and include our people at every stage of the 
employment lifecycle have never been more important.

Our materiality process identified the following people 
and performance focus areas for FY23:

 Š Retaining talent.

 Š Diversity, equity and inclusion.

 Š Training and development. 

 Š Remuneration linked to performance.

RETAINING TALENT 
—

Our workforce rose to the challenge of the substantial 
operational change agenda set out by the Board at the  
2022 Annual General Meeting which included targets to turn 
around operational performance and cash management. 
Our aim to return to operational certainty and restore 
shareholder value meant that FY23 was a year of rebalancing. 

We focused on guiding our workforce through substantial 
changes within our Executive Leadership Team (ELT), 
while continuing to prioritise the safety of our people and 
remaining conscious of cash flow and cost management. 
We set in motion a range of programs designed to support 
and retain our people at a time when uncertainty and fatigue 
were prevalent. 

There were a number of Group-wide initiatives introduced 
with the aim of recognising and rewarding our existing 
employees for remaining with the Company during these 
uncertain times:

 Š We invited Senior Professionals and Superintendents to 
participate in the Long-Term Incentive (LTI) Scheme for 
the first time. The LTI Scheme encourages ownership of 
the Company’s performance. Employees at Manager level 
and above continue to be eligible to participate in the 
LTI Scheme. 

 Š We promoted and embedded our Flexible Working 

Arrangements Standard including broadening Drive-In-
Drive Out (DIDO) and Fly-In Fly-Out (FIFO) roles to enable 
our employees to live where they want and continue to 
work for Aurelia. We added alternatives for accommodation 
including share-housing and camp options at our Peak 
Mine. We also promoted other options under the Flexible 
Working Standard that were embraced by our employees 

working at our Hera Mine which incentivised our 
employees’ commitment to remain with the Company 
until their roles were not required (redundancy) or remain 
with the Company and be transferred to another Aurelia 
worksite. The Scheme was designed to reduce employee 
resignations arising from concerns over job security and 
future employment and was successful with over 92% 
of employees participating in the Scheme remaining 
with the Company. A Retention Scheme at our Dargues 
Mine – which also incentivises employees to remain with 
the Company until their roles are no longer required was 
introduced at the beginning of FY24. 

 Š An Employee Share Scheme, whereby eligible permanent 
full-time and part-time employees can receive A$1,000 
in Aurelia shares, was issued again in FY23. For further 
information, see the Remuneration Report which begins 
on page 107.

DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND 
INCLUSION 
—

Aurelia recognises that a diverse and inclusive workforce 
brings a wide range of perspectives and experiences and 
enables employees to fully contribute their talent to business 
improvements and success. 

In FY23, we are proud to report an increased female 
representation across the workforce to 22.65% (FY22: 
21.5%). This represents the fourth year running that female 
representation has increased. 

Our Board remains committed to ensuring a minimum of 
25% of its members are women. As at 30 June 2023 female 
representation on the Board was 29%. 

We continue to take a proactive, ‘ground-up’ approach to 
understanding employee experiences across our business. 
This has included a psychosocial risk survey in FY23. 

Our Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DE&I) Working Group 
continued to meet throughout FY23, and progress was 
made against our measurable objectives and actions. 
These included:

 Š The development of a Parental Leave Standard and 
continuing to embed and promote our Workplace 
Flexibility Standard. These standards emphasise flexibility 
and are aimed at supporting parents to return to our 
workforce while balancing additional responsibilities 
at home. 

39 
—

AURELIA METALS Š Delivering an extensive face-to-face Workplace 

Behaviour Training package that educates employees 
on the Company’s expected behaviours when it comes 
to bullying, harassment (including sexual harassment), 
discrimination and victimisation. This training emphasised 
our robust support mechanisms available for employees 
to raise a concern, lodge a complaint or request a review 
of their grievance on a case-by-case basis. Within Aurelia, 
incidents of sexual harassment and inappropriate 
workplace behaviour are referred to the Senior Taskforce 
for Significant Incidents as High Potential Risk Incidents 
and require full investigation. The ELT is also fully 
briefed on any incidents of this nature, including actions 
management takes to prevent such incidents.

 Š The development of a Professional Development 

Procedure. This procedure was prioritised after a review 
of voluntary turnover data indicated that the key reason 
for leaving provided in exit interviews by our professional 
females was ‘pursuing career opportunities’. 

 Š Conducting an extensive gender pay gap analysis, before 
and after any award of salary increases. This was provided 
to both the Remuneration and Nomination Committee and 
the Board. 

 Š Continuing to collect information from our workforce 
relating to gender equity through targeted questions 
in exit interviews, a psychological risks survey and a 
sustainability survey to ascertain our employees’ beliefs 
regarding material topics for this Sustainability Report. 

LISTENING TO OUR EMPLOYEES

At Aurelia it is important our employees feel they are safe 
to speak up about issues in the workplace. In FY23, we 
continued to promote platforms and mechanisms whereby 
employees could voice concerns, seek help or raise 
a complaint. These methods include through: 

 Š our 24/7 confidential Whistleblower service provider, 

Stopline

 Š our external Employee Assistance Provider, 

Drake Wellbeing 

 Š their line management or human resources 

representative/s.

Our Fair Treatment Standard provides another avenue for our 
employees to raise and resolve disputes. 

We place great importance on our employees’ right to 
exercise freedom of association and work closely with 
relevant union representatives. In FY23, we had no strikes or 
lockouts at any of our sites. 

TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 
—

Aurelia is committed to fostering an environment wherein 
our people can reach their full potential. By investing in 
their capability and skills, we are investing in Aurelia’s 
future growth. 

We are committed to providing access to adequate support 
and resources for our employees to support our people to 
continue to feel confident in managing their mental health. 
As part of this support, members of our Human Resources 
and Health, Safety and Environment Teams completed Mental 
Health First Aid Training in FY23 through the Cobar TAFE.

This training provides the skills required to offer initial 
support to adults who are developing a mental health 
concern, are experiencing a worsening of an existing 
mental health concern or are in a mental health crisis, until 
appropriate professional help is received, or the crisis is 
resolved. The course is informed by the Mental Health First 
Aid (MHFA) Guidelines. Our aim is to ensure our key HR and 
HSE personnel have improved knowledge of mental illnesses 
and their treatments, knowledge of appropriate first aid 
strategies, and confidence in providing first aid to individuals 
with mental illness.

In FY23, we implemented Pegasus, a Learning and Contractor 
Management System to deliver a comprehensive solution 
to streamline our processes in contractor onboarding, 
contractor management, online learning, data integrity for 
training records and individual training needs analysis. This 
system replaced three Learning Management Systems across 
our sites. We are excited to be able to utilise this system to 
continue to build a capable and competent workforce. 

An aerial view of the Peak Mine process plant

40 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023CASE STUDY:  
MENTAL HEALTH  
TRAINING 
— 

(left to right) Electrical Planner, 
Stephen Mann and General 
Counsel and Company Secretary, 
Rochelle Carey at the Peak Mine

Keeping our people safe is – and will remain – 
a top priority for us. 

The period of sustained transition endured throughout FY23 
meant our workforce was challenged to ensure the health, 
safety and wellbeing of our people were not compromised. 
In recognition of this, we continued to partner with Mental 
Health Movement to provide mental health training for 
the Group. 

Beginning in FY22 with a trial at our Dargues Mine, the 
Mental Health Movement’s Mental Health Workplace 
Blueprint is a four-stage program which includes awareness, 
education, training and resources. Stage one and two 
were rolled out to the Peak, Hera and corporate-based 
employees in FY23, with a select number of representatives 
from all sites participating in training offered in stage 
three. Additionally, we invited our people to participate 
in a psychosocial hazards survey and risk assessment 
(see page 45). 

Mental Health Movement Founder, Dan Hunt spoke about the 
Mental Health Workplace Blueprint and how its methodology 
has helped the Company and our people. 

“At Mental Health Movement, we believe organisations 
need to be supported to help understand the importance 
of providing a mentally healthy and supportive workplace 
and effectively implement the right mental health supports. 
The Blueprint allows for this, aiming to improve literacy and 
resilience and reduce stigma surrounding reporting and 
managing mental health issues.

“In stage one, through the power of story, participants 
unpack six keys to improved mental health to begin to 

understand the supports available to them and how they can 
be activated. Workshops that dive deeper into mental health 
literacy, management, and personal reliance are offered in 
stage two, followed by accredited Mental Health First Aid 
and Mental Health Response training in stage three. These 
stages are supported by resources – stage four – which 
provide support and can facilitate conversations without the 
presence of Mental Health Movement. 

“By engaging us to roll out our Mental Health Workplace 
Blueprint, Aurelia Metals is helping provide a mentally healthy 
and supportive environment for its people,” Dan said. 

Our Group Manager – People, Susan Scheepers said the 
program has been well received, with positive results from 
a survey following stage one driving its continued roll out in 
FY24 and beyond. 

“The survey indicated 89% of respondents changed their 
perception of mental health, with a further 96% saying their 
knowledge of mental health had increased. 

“Importantly, the survey also indicated our employees would 
be more likely to seek support if they were struggling with 
mental health after the workshop, with 96% saying they 
felt more confident in managing their own mental health 
and 89% noted they felt they would be able to support a 
co-worker with a mental health struggle. 

“This program exemplifies how we are continuing to prioritise 
the health and safety of our workforce. We look forward to 
continuing to work with Mental Health Movement as we 
progress our workforce through the stages of their Workplace 
Blueprint,” Susan concluded. 

41 
—

AURELIA METALSREMUNERATION LINKED 
TO PERFORMANCE 
—

Fairness and equity are our key drivers to remunerate 
talent, as well as a focus on rewarding and recognising 
high performance. We recognise that fairness and equality 
in remuneration is necessary to attract, develop and retain 
high-calibre employees.

REMUNERATION FRAMEWORK 

Our remuneration framework promotes a performance-
based culture whereby competitive remuneration and 
rewards are aligned to Company business plans and 
shareholder objectives.

All employees’ employment conditions are underpinned 
by common law contracts. We don’t have any enterprise 
agreements at our sites. As a result, Aurelia undertakes 
annual market remuneration benchmarking (against similar 
industries and market capitalisation) for all levels within the 
business to maintain market competitiveness for attraction 
and retention.

Our gender pay gap analysis forms part of Aurelia’s Diversity 
and Inclusion Policy. This Policy is overseen by our Board and 
forms part of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee 
Charter and annual work plans to review and address any 
gaps. Performance and salary reviews are moderated by the 
Senior Leadership Team to ensure both internal consistency 
and that there are no gender or other attribute biases prior to 
the Board’s review.

In FY23, we undertook a gender pay gap analysis of 
like-for-like roles. No gaps were identified.

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CYCLE 

In FY23, our Short-Term Incentive (STI) Plan was simplified, 
moving to Company and site performance measured 
against three pillars: safety, production, and cost outcomes. 
We believe realigning employee individual performance 
goals under these pillars will help the Company unlock future 
business success. It also allows employees to make a clear 
link between individual and Company performance and the 
payment of their variable remuneration. 

Every employee continues to have an individual Achievement 
Development Plan (ADPs) (including Trades and Operators-
level employees). ADPs outline individual performance 
targets, identify development needs and opportunities, and 
assess an employee’s alignment to key behavioural indicators 
outlined in The Aurelia Way. 

In FY23, we introduced Personal Key Performance Indicator 
(KPI) Plans for Supervisor-level and above employees. 
The KPI Plans outline two to three individual performance 
targets that extend beyond normal position description 
duties. These targets align with our Group-wide strategy and 
plans and are designed to reward employees who outperform 
in their role and contribute to the success of the Company. 

ADPs and KPI Plans are developed and agreed at the 
beginning of the financial year and every employee 
participates in an informal mid-year and a formal year-end 
review to discuss progress against targets. Outcomes from 
these reviews against ADPs determine remuneration 
increases in an objective, consistent way for all employees. 
For roles below supervisory level, performance against 
ADPs also determines the outcome of the individual 
component of an employee’s STI. For Supervisor levels and 
above, performance against the KPI Plans determines the 
outcome of the individual component of their employee’s STI. 
All full-time, part-time and eligible fixed-term employees 
participate in this process.

In FY24, there will be a targeted focus on informal and formal 
training and professional development opportunities that 
are tailored and planned for all employees as outlined in 
their ADPs.

42 
—

(left to right) Chief Financial Officer, Martin 
Cummings, Managing Director and Chief 
Executive Officer, Bryan Quinn with Hera Care 
and Maintenance Supervisor, Luke O’Reilly tour 
the plant facilities at the Hera site

ANNUAL REPORT 2023Workforce Size

Corporate/ 
Exploration

Peak Mine 

Hera Mine 

Dargues Mine 

Total 

FY21
EMPLOYEES CONTRACTORS

FY22
EMPLOYEES CONTRACTORS

FY23
EMPLOYEES CONTRACTORS

25

133

63

37

258

1

279

109

83

472

49

153

54

51

307

6

315

120

81

522

45

199

6

48

298

8

75

3

74

160

Employee Gender Diversity (%)

Male 

Female 

FY21

FY22

FY23

81

19

78

22

77

23

Employee-Initiated Turnover (%)

FY21

FY22

FY23

-*

28

34

31

32

22

19

28

44

26

40

27

47

41

36

Corporate

Peak Mine 

Hera Mine 

Dargues Mine 

Total 

*Data not available prior to FY22

Local Employment (%)

FY22

FY23

RESIDENTIAL

OTHER

RESIDENTIAL

OTHER

Peak Mine 

Hera Mine 

Dargues Mine 

81

39

86

19

61

14

66

0

61

34

100

39

Employee Gender Diversity by Employment Level (%)

EMPLOYMENT 
LEVEL

Board

Executive/General 
Manager

Principal/Manager

Senior Professional/ 
Superintendent

Professional/ 
Supervisor

Paraprofessionals/ 
Operators 

FY21

FY22

FY23

MALE

FEMALE

MALE

FEMALE

MALE

FEMALE

67

100

81

79

82

80

33

0

19

21

18

20

71

100

78

76

85

75

29

0

22

24

15

25

71

87.5

80

72

91

75

29

12.5

20

28

9

25

43 
—

AURELIA METALSHEALTH AND SAFETY 
PERFORMANCE 
—

Aurelia is committed to the health and safety of our 
employees, contractors and communities. We achieve 
this through our Safe Metals program and zero harm 
philosophy whereby all workplace incidents and 
injuries are considered preventable. 

We strive to continually improve our health and safety 
performance through our annual planning cycle process.

Our materiality process identified the following health and 
safety performance focus areas for FY23:

 Š  Safety culture.

 Š  Fatal hazards and critical controls.

 Š  Contractor management.

 Š  Health and wellbeing.

SAFETY CULTURE 
— 

Aurelia’s safety culture is incorporated within The Aurelia Way 
and supports our Rules to Live By. 

The Rules to Live By were developed in response to High 
Potential Risk Incidents (HPRI) which have previously caused 
harm and/or fatalities in the mining industry. The Rules set 
expectations and guide individual behaviours.

Our safety culture is supported by requiring people in 
supervisor and above roles to participate in our Safety 
Leadership Program.

Under the Safety Leadership Program, leaders demonstrate 
visible safety leadership by engaging in proactive 
conversations, observations and inspections (including Safe 
Act Observations, Planned Task Observations, Workplace 
Inspections, Critical Control and HPRI Verifications), in line 
with a lead indicator matrix and schedule. This helps us to 
determine the effectiveness of our safety understanding and 
controls throughout the business.

In FY23, we achieved >85% compliance with our Safety 
Leadership Program targets.

TOTAL RECORDABLE INJURY 
FREQUENCY RATE 

Aurelia’s safety performance continued to improve this year 
with a significant reduction in the Total Recordable Injury 
Frequency Rate (TRIFR) from 8.7 to 5.1 per million hours 
worked – this was enabled by the Group experiencing no 
recordable injuries during the second half of the reporting 
year, and our Dargues site remaining recordable injury-free 
for the entire 12-month period. No work-related illnesses 
were reported in FY23. We are targeting to further reduce 
TRIFR in FY24 to ≤ 4.6.

e
t
a
r
y
c
n
e
u
q
e
r
F
y
r
u
n
I
e
b
a
d
r
o
c
e
R

l

j

12

10

8

6

)
d
e
k
r
o
w
s
r
u
o
h
n
o

i
l
l
i

m

r
e
p
(

l

a
t
o
T

4
2021

44 
—

2022

2023

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recordable Injuries – FY23

EMPLOYEES

CONTRACTORS

MEDICAL 
TREATMENT

RESTRICTED 
WORK

LOST TIME

MEDICAL 
TREATMENT

RESTRICTED 
WORK

LOST TIME

Peak Mine 

Hera Mine 

Dargues Mine 

Exploration 

Total 

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

2

1

-

-

3

3

-

-

-

3

-

1

-

-

1

We have also developed CCVs, based on a bowtie risk 
analysis, for the following Fatal or Catastrophic Hazards:

 Š Airborne Contaminants

 Š Explosives and Blasting

 Š Ground Failure

 Š Emergency Response

 Š Inundation and Inrush

 Š Open Holes and Voids

 Š Working at Heights

 Š Tailings Storage Facilities

 Š Cranes and Lifting

 Š Confined Space

 Š Fire/Explosion

CCVs are used to verify that the critical controls identified for 
our Fatal Hazards are in place and effective. Progress against 
the CCV program is tracked at a site level and reported 
monthly to senior management.

In FY23, we engaged an external auditor to undertake deep 
dive audits of compliance with the following Fatal Hazard 
Standards at all three operating sites:

 Š Hera – Hazardous Materials

 Š Dargues – Hazardous Energy, and Mobile Plant and Traffic

 Š Peak – Hazardous Materials, Hazardous Energy, and Mobile 

Plant and Traffic.

The audits provided valuable insights into each site’s systems 
and processes for ensuring compliance with the Standards, 
along with feedback on the effectiveness of the Fatal Hazard 
Standards themselves. The results from the audits were 
generally positive, with each site implementing corrective 
actions throughout the year to close out identified gaps.

PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION 

In line with our focus on the safety of our people in FY23, 
we conducted a psychosocial hazards survey. Conducted with 
employees, this was part of our overall program of work 
identifying and assessing psychosocial risks in the workplace, 
and was preceded by a training package made available to 
all employees. We received responses from 110 employees, 
allowing us to identify the most prevalent psychosocial 
hazards and prioritise these in our risk assessment process. 

A risk assessment followed the survey and was undertaken 
as a workshop over two days in Cobar, with employee 
representatives from across the business. The assessment 
uncovered valuable insights into the assessment of 
psychosocial risks in the workplace and the identification 
of control strategies.

FATAL HAZARDS AND 
CRITICAL CONTROLS 
— 

In FY23, we continued to focus on preventing fatalities and 
serious incidents by continuing to develop Fatal Hazard 
Standards and Critical Control Verifications (CCVs) which 
set the minimum requirements for our most significant 
safety risks.

To date, we have implemented Fatal and Catastrophic Hazard 
Standards and CCVs for: 

 Š Mobile Plant and Traffic

 Š Tyres and Rims

 Š Hazardous Energy Isolation

 Š Hazardous Materials

 Š Open Holes and Voids

 Š Airborne Contaminants

 Š Ground Failure

 Š Explosives and Blasting

 Š Emergency Response

 Š Cranes and Lifting

 Š Tailings Storage Facilities

45 
—

AURELIA METALSCASE STUDY:  
ROLL OUT OF THE  
CONTRACTOR HSE 
MANAGEMENT  
PROCEDURE  
— 

Electrical 
Contractor for 
JTMEC at the 630L 
safety sign at the 
Peak Mine

In response to identifying all recordable injuries 
experienced at Aurelia sites in recent years sustained 
by contractor workers, in FY23 we identified 
contractor management as a material issue for 
the business and rolled out a Contractor HSE 
Management Procedure. 

The Procedure defines the process to award work, assign 
a contract owner, contract coordinator and contractor’s 
representative, and manage the HSE risks posed by 
contractors performing work for Aurelia. 

Under the Procedure, Aurelia personnel designated as the 
‘Contract Owner’ or ‘Contract Coordinator’ are required 
to complete specific monitoring and compliance work 
throughout the procurement, engagement, onboarding, 
execution and demobilisation phases of their contracts. 
This work ensures contractors have in place appropriate 
safety management systems and their workers are trained 
and competent to carry out their duties on site.

Contractors are assigned a risk rating dependent on 
the type and complexity of their work, and this rating 
dictates the frequency and type of supervision that each 
contractor requires.

 Š Level 1 contractors perform short duration, low-risk work 
and are required to receive day-to-day supervision or 
escort from an Aurelia employee.

 Š Level 2 contractors undertake work in which Aurelia has 

greater experience or Aurelia performs a greater directive 
role, and Aurelia has management systems specific to the 
task(s). These contractors are supervised on a day-to-
day basis, and subject to more stringent monitoring and 
management than Level 1.

 Š Level 3 contractors are the highest risk contractors, and 
are managed much more closely under the Procedure. 
This category includes contractors undertaking work 
that requires specialist expertise, and where Aurelia may 
not have management systems specific to the task(s) 
to be undertaken.

Speaking about the Procedure, Heath Carney, Principal – Risk 
and Sustainability, spoke about the success of the standard in 
bringing down contractor-related safety incidents. 

“The implementation of the Contractor HSE Management 
Procedure has been an integral part of Aurelia’s safety 
improvement program in 2023. It contributed to the 
reduction in recordable injuries sustained by contractors from 
15 in FY22 to 7 in FY23,” Heath explained. 

The Contractor HSE Management Procedure is another way 
we are ensuring everyone who undertakes work at any of our 
sites goes home safe, every day. 

46 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023HEALTH AND WELLBEING 
— 

suitably rested prior to commencing their shift. We undertake 
routine drug and alcohol testing at our sites and have 
implemented a fatigue management program.

Ongoing health and hygiene monitoring is undertaken at our 
sites, dependent on the level of risk exposure, and includes:

 Š surveillance for noise and airborne contaminant exposure 

including silica, dust, and diesel particulates

 Š testing of blood lead levels

 Š periodic medicals for operational personnel.

With FY23 being a year of disruption and transformation at 
Aurelia, our promotion of employee health was focused on 
psychosocial safety and the mental health of our workforce.

Along with this initiative, we also implemented a program 
of Mental Health Awareness and Mental Health Resilience 
training, facilitated across our sites, including the 
corporate office. Further detail on these initiatives is provided 
in the Mental Health Training case study in the People 
Performance section on page 41.

All employees and contractors undertaking work at our 
sites are required to complete a pre-employment medical, 
including assessment of medical and functional fitness 
for work, and are required to present to work fit for duty. 
This includes being free of alcohol and other drugs and being 

Underground Truck Operator, Pamela Lowe at 
the 630L of the Peak Mine 

47 
—

AURELIA METALSCOMMUNITY 
PERFORMANCE 
— 

'Little Miners' – 
children of our Peak 
Mine employees enjoy 
the festivities at the 
2022 Cobar Christmas 
Parade which was 
sponsored by the Peak 
Donations Committee

Aurelia is committed to ensuring our presence has a 
positive impact in the communities where we operate, 
and our long-term relationships create shared 
enduring value.

COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 
AND DEVELOPMENT 
— 

Through understanding and a collaborative approach, 
we ensure mutually beneficial opportunities and outcomes 
to improve the overall quality of life within our communities. 
By taking community members’ views into account, informed 
decisions are made for support programs and prioritising 
local employment and procurement of goods and services 
through local businesses. 

Our materiality process identified the following community 
performance focus areas for FY23:

 Š  Community investment and development

 Š  First Nations engagement

 Š  Project approval engagement

 Š  Grievance management.

Our focus is to support local community groups and 
businesses wherever possible with our main priority being 
projects supporting health, education and cultural initiatives. 
We also have ongoing relationships with local sporting groups 
and community events, which we believe are the beating 
heart of local communities in regional and remote NSW.

Over the last three years, approximately 51% of our 
procurement has been sourced from local communities, 
which has injected approximately A$449M into regional NSW.

In addition to the approximately A$1.3M we paid in Voluntary 
Planning Agreement (VPA) contributions (which includes 
maintenance of local roads, community programs and 
administration), we have also made discretionary donations of 
approximately A$0.4M to local community groups and events 
over the last three years. These programs are supported by 
the Dargues and Peak Community Grants Programs which 
are typically held on a quarterly basis. 

48 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023These VPA contributions and donations have supported 
projects such as:

 Š Improved access to medical services in rural NSW 

through subsidised housing for health professionals 
visiting Braidwood.

 Š Donations of valuable medical supplies to the Cobar 

Athletics Club so they can continue to deliver inclusive 
and community-based activities to the people of 
Cobar and encourage them to lead an active and 
healthy lifestyle.

 Š Supply communications equipment to the Rural Fire 

Service in Cobar. The equipment will increase network 
coverage and ensure the fire service can continue to 
respond to people in need.

 Š Aurelia was proud to sponsor the world premiere of 
‘Cancel Culture’ in Cobar. The opera showcase was 
written and performed by students from the Cobar High 
School. The experimental education program is the first 
of its kind and aims to empower, inspire and encourage 
young people to engage in the arts.

 Š Supply of solar panels to the Cobar Amateur Pistol Club 
who are set to reduce their overhead costs (after being 
severely impacted by COVID–19) and their greenhouse 
gas emissions.

 Š We were delighted to donate an awning to the St John’s 
Parents & Friends Association in Cobar for the schools 
pickup zone. The awning will help to protect kids from 
the elements while waiting for the school bus.

 Š We were honoured to contribute to the Braidwood 
& District Education Foundation who gave us the 
opportunity to provide financial support to a young 
person from the Braidwood High School who is 
heading to University of Wollongong to further their 
tertiary education.

 Š Earth Sciences Rock and Aurelia was excited to speak 
at the Cobar High School as part of the ‘Teacher Earth 
Science Education Programme’. 

Community Investments (A$)

FY21

FY22

FY23

Local procurement

184M

174M

127M

Voluntary Planning Agreement 
contributions

0.8M

0.3M

0.2M

Discretionary donations 

0.1M

0.1M

0.2M

In FY23, work continued on the development of a 
Community Strategy that includes a social investment 
framework. The Strategy aims to redefine our approach 
to social investment in a way that increases the positive 
impact we can have on our local communities.

Music students at Cobar High School during a 
taiko drumming workshop made possible through 
support from the Peak Donations Committee 

49 
—

AURELIA METALS50 
—

General Manager – Dargues, Angus Wyllie (right) 
with representatives from the Majors Creek 
Bushfire Brigade (left and centre) - a recipient of 
the Dargues Community Grants Program

ANNUAL REPORT 2023FIRST NATIONS ENGAGEMENT 
— 

Significant stakeholder consultation was undertaken 
throughout the exploration and approvals processes for 
this Project.

We value the relationship we have with First Nations Peoples 
on whose land we operate, and we acknowledge their rights 
and interests to protect and manage their cultural heritage. 
Their engagement through exploration and discovery, to mine 
development, operations and into closure is invaluable, and 
we respect the responsibilities and obligations First Nations 
Peoples have for Country.

We strive to meet our legal and statutory obligations and 
undertake fair and respectful consultation with our host 
First Nations Peoples. Across our exploration and mining 
tenure, we operate on the traditional lands of the Wongaibon, 
Ngiyampaa, Wiradjuri and Ngarigo.

For projects being developed, there has been extensive 
consultation with Registered Aboriginal Parties (RAPs) 
involving all aspects of the project, cultural heritage, heritage 
surveys and clearances. Through this consultation, it was 
identified the RAPs felt the name of the Federation Project 
was inappropriate. Aurelia is currently engaging with RAPs 
to determine a more culturally appropriate name. This may 
take some time to complete as there is an active Native Title 
Claim over the land encompassing Federation that is yet to 
be determined. 

In FY23, Aurelia had no incidents involving First Nations 
Peoples. We do not operate in any areas with Native Title 
Agreements in place, however we acknowledge there 
is an active Native Title claimant over areas containing 
our Peak and Hera Mines which is yet to be determined. 
This relates to an application made by the Ngemba, 
Ngiyampaa, Wangaaypuwan and Wayilan People. While the 
application is determined by the NSW government, we will 
continue to foster fair and respectful relationships with First 
Nations Peoples.

PROJECT APPROVAL 
ENGAGEMENT 
— 

In FY23, we received development consent approval for the 
Federation Project from the NSW government. Development 
of the Project has commenced, with works associated with 
surface facilities and the underground decline ongoing. 

The consultation included numerous site visits, heritage 
clearance surveys, community information sessions and 
ongoing consultation with the project-specific Community 
Consultative Committees (CCC). RAPs also participated in 
Cultural Heritage and First Nations training for our employees 
and contractors.

Aurelia has established CCCs across the Group. The CCCs 
are independently chaired and include a number of key 
representatives from the local community. They provide 
the community with an opportunity to engage directly with 
the Company, ask questions, flag issues or air grievances. 
Aurelia values the input of our CCCs which provide a direct 
link between the Company, the management team and 
the community. 

GRIEVANCE MANAGEMENT 
— 

Aurelia investigates all complaints and grievances and 
responds fairly and promptly. We take an active approach to 
understanding our stakeholder issues and their concerns 
through face-to-face forums.

The success of our approach to proactively engaging with 
the community has been demonstrated since our acquisition 
of the Dargues Mine with community complaints decreasing 
from 115 in FY22 to 43 complaints in FY23 (most relating 
to noise).

This has been achieved through genuine, respectful 
engagement with the local community. In response to 
community feedback, we have implemented a number of 
initiatives including on-site inspections with members of 
nearby communities to determine the cause of the issue 
and exploring and implementing a number of suggested 
abatement opportunities.

In FY23, Aurelia did not displace or resettle any 
community members or First Nations Peoples as a result 
of our operations. Artisanal and small-scale mining does 
not take place on or adjacent to our operations.

Complaints

The proposed development demonstrated significant benefit 
to the local community and State of NSW through providing:

Peak Mine 

 Š critical minerals (copper and zinc) which will be required to 

Hera Mine 

decarbonise the economy

 Š employment opportunities

 Š taxes and royalties

 Š certainty that mining will continue within the region to 

ensure the Cobar township continues to thrive.

Dargues Mine 

Corporate 

Total 

FY21

FY22

FY23

18

1

397

-

416

17

2

115

-

134

2

3

43

-

48

51 
—

AURELIA METALSCASE STUDY:  
INSTALLATION OF  
THE NOISE ATTENUATOR  
AT THE DARGUES MINE 
— 

In December 2022, Aurelia installed a noise 
attenuator on the mine ventilation fan at our 
Dargues Mine to address noise concerns from the 
neighbouring Majors Creek community. 

Following an increase in noise complaints (which coincided 
with an increase in the depth of mine activity and speed of 
the ventilation circuit), we engaged a third-party consultant 
to conduct a noise audit across site. 

While the audit confirmed the ventilation fan was the source 
of the intrusive night-time noise, it also concluded Dargues 
was operating within noise limits. Despite this, we pursued a 
custom-built silencer for the ventilation fan. 

General Manager – Dargues, Angus Wyllie spoke about 
the project and how it demonstrates our commitment to 
going above and beyond to address the concerns of the 
communities in which we operate. 

“Following several months of consultation, a noise audit, and 
confirmation from its CCC and community members, the 
mine ventilation fan was unequivocally determined as the 
source of noise concerns from the residents of Majors Creek. 

“The fan speed had increased from 70 to 82% to maintain 
the required airflow within the underground operating areas. 
Further increases in the fan speed are planned as the mine 
progresses deeper and the resistance of the ventilation 
circuit increases. 

“Utilising this data, we engaged Quality Acoustics to design 
an attenuation measure. The unique specification of the 
silencer and reduced consumable availability (associated with 
COVID–19) pushed production time, with the fan arriving on 
site on 30 November. Installation was completed on  
1 December. 

The Dargues Mine ventilation fan attenuator 
being brought to site, November 2022

“Three months after the installation, an additional external 
audit of the attenuator was conducted. It concluded the 
noise from the mine ventilation fan while operating at 80% 
fan speed measured 15–25 decibels (dBZ). This was down 
from the 2022 reading of 20–30dBZ (at the same speed and 
measured from the same position). Furthermore, at maximum 
speed (100%), noise from the fan measured 15–25dBZ, down 
from the 2022 reading of 25–35dBZ.

“Mining companies have a duty of care to their communities, 
no matter which state and/or country they are operating in. 
It’s incumbent upon them to operate within the constraints 
of their Mining Lease and development consent conditions 
as well as other contractual, policy and legal obligations. 
It’s not necessary to go above and beyond these contractual 
commitments. In this situation, we did.

"The decision to act strengthened our social licence to 
operate and demonstrates our commitment to being a 
good corporate citizen, and our willingness to go above and 
beyond to address concerns raised by its communities,” 
Angus concluded. 

52 
—

Final installation of the attenuator on the Dargues Mine ventilation fan

ANNUAL REPORT 2023ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE 
— 

Our unwavering commitment to environmental stewardship 
includes the preservation of biodiversity, the judicious 
utilisation of resources (including water), the management of 
tailings and waste rock, and rehabilitation and closure.

Our materiality process identified the following 
environmental performance focus areas for FY23:

 Š  Climate change

 Š  Land and biodiversity

 Š  Water management

 Š  Tailings and waste rock

 Š  Rehabilitation and closure.

Aurelia acknowledges the risks to the environment inherent 
in our operations. From exploration and development, through 
to operations and into closure, Aurelia steadfastly endeavours 
to mitigate its ecological footprint and preserve the natural 
world we share.

As at 30 June 2023, we achieved a Recordable 
Environmental Incident Frequency Rate (REIFR) per million 
hours worked of 2.91 (target of ≤ 3). In recognition of our 
REIFR reporting framework and the positive impact it has 
on our environmental performance, we were honoured to 
receive the ‘Environmental Excellence’ Award at the 2023 
NSW Mining HSEC Awards dinner on 7 August 2023. 

Recognising the magnitude of the challenge climate change 
poses to our natural world, we are resolute in our dedication 
to enhancing our resilience to climate-related risks. 
This encompasses the reduction, management and 
meticulous oversight of greenhouse gas emissions and other 
far-reaching consequences of climate change.

Environment and Community Advisor, 
Laura Newton conducting water monitoring 
activities at the Peak Mine

53 
—

AURELIA METALSCASE STUDY:  
INDUSTRY  
RECOGNITION  
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL  
EXCELLENCE  
— 

(left to right) Aurelia Group Manager – Environment 
and Community, Jonathon Thompson with Evolution 
Group Manager Environment, Alisa Wilkinson 
following the announcement Aurelia won the Award 
for Environmental Excellence at the 2023 NSW 
Minerals Council's HSEC Awards

On 7 August 2023, we were honoured to receive the 
‘Environmental Excellence’ Award at the 2023 NSW 
Minerals Council’s HSEC Awards dinner. The Award 
recognises our Recordable Environmental Incident 
Frequency Rate (REIFR) reporting framework. 

As entrusted custodians of the local environments where 
we operate, we take the protection and management of the 
environment very seriously. Group Manager – Environment 
and Community, Jonathon Thompson spoke about our REIFR 
framework and how it addresses a lack of standardisation in 
NSW regarding environmental reporting. 

 "Given we view safety and environmental performance 
as intrinsically linked, it comes as no surprise we’ve 
seen year-on-year improvements in our environmental 
and safety performance. 

“Our REIFR reporting framework is a unique solution to an 
absence in standardisation for mining companies to report 
their environmental performance. In our Award submission, 
we highlighted the advantages of the framework for other 
mining companies. These advantages transcend transparency 
obligations and point to improved safety and environmental 
performance and strengthening employee accountability. 

“Our REIFR is calculated by tracking environmental incidents 
that could cause material harm to the environment per 
million hours worked. This mirrors our TRIFR reporting. 

“REIFR reporting has and will continue to strengthen our 
social licence to operate through improved relationships 
with our shareholders and stakeholders,” Jonathon said. 

“Incorporating REIFR into our reporting framework 
coincided with the overarching cultural shift that came 
with the inception and roll out of our Aurelia Metals – 
Safe Metals Strategy.

For more on our Aurelia Metals – Safe Metals Strategy, see 
page 22 of our 2020 Annual Report, available on our website 
at: https://aureliametals.com/investors/company-reporting/ 

54 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023CLIMATE CHANGE  
— 

LAND AND BIODIVERSITY 
— 

Climate change remains a dynamic subject, presenting both 
formidable challenges and promising prospects for Aurelia. 

In FY23, our approximate Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions 
totalled 104,596t CO2-e. This was a reduction on previous 
years, driven by the Hera site entering care and maintenance. 
We expect carbon emissions to increase in FY24 with the 
ramp up of the Federation Project. Federation includes a solar 
farm which will offset some of the carbon emissions. 

Scope 1 and Scope 2 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions are 
calculated based on the Australian Government methodology 
required by the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting 
(NGER) scheme.

Our Scope 1 emissions are predominantly associated with 
gas-fired electricity generation at the Hera Mine with a 
smaller proportion from our operational vehicle fleet. Scope 2 
emissions relate to purchased electricity at the Peak and 
Dargues Mines. 

Scope 3 emissions are those associated with activities that 
are not under our operational control, such as emissions 
resulting from product transportation, and we have not yet 
calculated these emissions. 

Greenhouse gas emissions (kt CO2-e)

FY21

FY22

FY23

Scope 1 emissions 

34.5

32.9

Scope 2 emissions 

76.1

81.0

24.2

80.4

Greenhouse gas intensity (t CO2-e per oz Au eq)

Scope 1 and 2 emissions 
intensity 

FY21

FY22

FY23

0.54

0.58

0.72

Energy use and production (GJ per oz Au eq)

Energy produced 

Energy consumed 

FY21

FY22

FY23

0.47

4.47

0.44

0.42

4.68

5.94

This is preliminary data and is subject to change pending external review 
and verification.

Aurelia values the diverse environments in which it operates 
and is committed to managing its impacts on these important 
ecosystems. For Aurelia, biodiversity includes the responsible 
consumption of water sources, resource management, and 
protecting the natural environment. 

Environmental compliance is consistently front of mind, as is 
improving systems and processes. Our Environment Team is 
streamlining our Environmental Management System (EMS) 
to support our growing business profile. 

In FY23, we advanced the environmental approvals 
for the Federation Project. Federation will increase our 
environmental footprint and resources use, such as water and 
energy. We have ensured our EMS, policies and procedures, 
consider the impacts of this increase are mitigated to 
minimise impacts on the environment.

Aurelia is committed to protecting or offsetting our impacts 
to biodiversity through the implementation of our Group-
wide Green Rules. The Green Rules are similar to our safety, 
Rules to Live By and guide individual behaviours. The four 
rules manage disturbance, hazardous material, water 
management and wildlife. The Green Rules are included in all 
employee inductions with clear signage at our mine sites and 
exploration areas.

Offsetting – in accordance with the Biodiversity 
Assessment Methodology (BAM) – is another way we work 
to protect biodiversity. Our impacts to biodiversity at the 
Federation Project are offset through the retirement of 
biodiversity credits at our offset property, Chelsea. If Aurelia 
does not have the required biodiversity credits, they are 
sourced from a third party or the NSW government. 

The Chelsea offset property has an established Biodiversity 
Stewardship Agreement (BSA) with the NSW government. 
The property is approximately 2,500 hectares and we have 
committed to protecting its biodiversity values and improving 
them over time. 

At Dargues, we are working with relevant stakeholders to 
establish an offsite and onsite biodiversity offset property. 
In FY23, we progressed negotiations with a third-party 
landholder to establish a biodiversity offset area on 
their property. It is proposed that the area – an established 
Tablelands basalt forest community – will be secured and 
protected for biodiversity value in perpetuity by establishing 
conditions on the Land Title. 

55 
—

AURELIA METALSWATER  
—

Aurelia understands that mining operations have the 
potential to impact water supply and quality and that these 
impacts need to be managed appropriately, especially in the 
dry, water-stressed environment of western NSW.

Fish biologist from the 
University of Canberra during 
an aquatic monitoring survey of 
the Spring and Majors Creeks 
near the Dargues Mine

Water is a resource we share with the environment and 
our communities, and we recognise we need to use water 
efficiently and protect the surrounding environment. 
Aurelia does not discharge to the surrounding environment. 
All water is reused on our operating sites and excess water 
is evaporated or irrigated to mine-owned pasture.

In FY23, our sites continued to manage excess water 
from heavy rainfall in the region. At the Peak Mine, we 
continue to evaporate excess water within purpose-built 
evaporation dams. 

With the Group processing fewer tonnes and the Hera 
Mine entering care and maintenance, water use efficiency 
decreased in FY23.

Water use and efficiency

TAILINGS MANAGEMENT  
—

The responsible management of tailings facilities is a high 
priority for Aurelia. 

Mining and processing metalliferous ore extracts a 
small portion of the volume of material introduced to 
the processing plant. The remaining depleted ore is 
transferred as a slurry to dedicated tailings storage 
facilities (TSFs). The facilities are engineered, designed 
and constructed to provide secure storage of fine tailings 
as a permanent landform. 

The operations and management of our TSFs occur within 
the guidelines and boundaries of regulations and codes 
of practice, such as NSW Dam Safety Guidelines, and the 
Australian National Committee on Large Dams Guidelines on 
Tailings Dams (2012) (ANCOLD).

Aurelia operates central-thickened TSFs at our Peak Mine 
and Hera sites and a perimeter discharge TSF at the 
Dargues Mine.

TSFs are designed by industry experts and risk-assessed 
to determine appropriate designs while considering local 
meteorological (low rainfall and high evaporation rates), 
topographical (utilising local topography to reduce site 
footprints) and other site-specific conditions. 

Our TSFs are operated in accordance with site-specific operation 
and maintenance manuals. This includes regular inspections 
and an annual inspection by an independent TSF Engineer. 
Each of our sites have completed a dam break analysis, and have 
Pollution Incident Response Management Plans in place.

WSP Golder and BK Civil were engaged in 2021 to complete 
the Stage 5 embankment raise of the TSF at our Peak Mine. 
The work increased capacity within the existing TSF and was 
completed in early 2023. Aurelia was nominated as a finalist 
in the 2022 Prospect Awards in the ‘Mine Project Success of 
the Year Award’ category for the project which showcased the 
exemplary work by the Peak Mine operational team and our 
supporting civil contractors and design engineers. 

FY21

FY22

FY23

Tailings production (kt)

Water withdrawal (ML) 

581

709

614

Water consumption (ML)

1,266

1,170

1,103

Water use efficiency 
(KL/oz Au eq)

6.79

5.94

7.61

Tailings production 

1,119

1,165

1,033

FY21

FY22

FY23

56 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
WASTE ROCK MANAGEMENT  
—

REHABILITATION AND CLOSURE  
—

Waste rock is stored in purpose-built waste rock 
emplacements. Where waste rock is non-acid forming, it is 
stored for use in future rehabilitation projects or used in civil 
construction activities including TSF embankment raises 
and road bases.

An aerial photo of construction activities 
during the stage 5 lift of the Peak Mine TSF

Waste rock brought to the surface (kt)

Waste rock production 

153

204

156

FY21

FY22

FY23

Planning for closure commences at the feasibility stage and 
continues throughout the mine’s operational life to identify 
and reduce risks and unknowns over time. Aurelia recognises 
that strong engagement and ongoing consideration of closure 
from the development phase will help mitigate risks and 
identify opportunities to leave a positive legacy. We recognise 
that we have a responsibility to close mines in a way that 
leaves a safe, stable and self-supporting environment.

Our mines and projects are governed by Rehabilitation 
Management Plans which are overseen by the NSW 
Resources Regulator. In FY23, we lodged our Rehabilitation 
Management Plans and Form and Way documents with the 
regulator for all sites. This was in response to a change in the 
Mining Act which standardised rehabilitation requirements 
across NSW. The management plans included identification 
of the mine activities, associated risks, costs, and local 
community engagement.

Our closure plans are supported by a Rehabilitation Cost 
Estimate (RCE), which informs our closure provision 
which is backed by Aurelia and secured via a government 
guarantee. To ensure our closure provisions remain current, 
we engage independent third-party consultants to undertake 
annual reviews. This is also reviewed by the Audit Committee 
to ensure its veracity.

In FY23, Hera's mining operations ceased and its surface 
facilities transitioned into care and maintenance. 
Aurelia continues to manage and mitigate risks on 
site. The surface facilities are planned to recommence 
operations as the Federation Project ramps up. 

Following life-of-mine planning in FY23, we anticipate 
our Dargues Mine will progress to mine closure in FY25. 
Therefore, we are in the process of determining the final 
details of closure which will be captured in a detailed Mine 
Closure Plan. This plan will be informed by the Rehabilitation 
Management Plan and Form and Way documents. 

We are actively refining and investigating ways to better 
close our mines through various studies, consultation and 
progressive rehabilitation of areas no longer required 
for operations.

57 
—

AURELIA METALSCASE STUDY:  
FEDERATION PROJECT  
ENVIRONMENTAL  
APPROVALS  
— 

At Aurelia, we’re committed to rapidly developing 
our Federation Project, one of the highest grade 
base metal development projects in Australia. Our 
timely completion of the Project permitting process 
– including obtaining all required environmental 
approvals – exemplifies this commitment. 

Following the discovery drill hole at the Federation 
Project in 2019, we moved quickly to prepare the 
permitting documentation required to obtain development 
consent. The first step was to apply for the Secretary’s 
Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) from 
the NSW government. 

Received in August 2021, the SEARs were addressed 
in Federation’s Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 
and supporting documentation which we completed and 
submitted in March 2022. The EIS was then placed on public 
exhibition for community and government consultation. 

Between April and October 2022, we received several 
comments and submissions from government agencies 
regarding the EIS, all of which were addressed in our 
‘Response to Submissions’. We were also pleased to 
receive no objections to the Project and one Letter of 
Support from a Project landholder during this time, 
confirming that Federation has significant support from 
our local communities. 

58 
—

An aerial view of the Federation Project site

The Federation Project permitting was completed on 2 March 
2023 when we were pleased to receive full development 
consent from the NSW government, three months earlier 
than anticipated. Federation is now one of the fastest moving 
mining projects in recent NSW history, and the first greenfield 
critical metals project to be approved in the last seven years. 

Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Bryan 
Quinn thanked the NSW government for working with 
us to complete permitting for the Federation Project. 

“On behalf of everyone at Aurelia, I want to thank the NSW 
government for working with us to approve Federation in 
such a short timeframe. The Project will contribute to the 
regional economy, and supply the metals essential for the 
manufacture of renewable technologies. 

“We look forward to continuing to work with the government 
and regulatory agencies in NSW on the development of the 
Federation Project which will be an important source of 
value to our shareholders and the community where we are 
privileged to operate,” Bryan said. 

ANNUAL REPORT 2023GRI CONTENT INDEX  
— 

Aurelia Metals has reported the information cited in this GRI content index for the period 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023 with reference to the GRI Standards 
as listed in the table below, the 2010 G4 Sector Disclosures for Mining and Metals and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. 

GRI DISCLOSURE

GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021

2-1 Organizational details

WHERE TO FIND 
RELATED INFORMATION

SUSTAINABLE 
DEVELOPMENT GOAL

2-2 Entities included in the organization’s sustainability reporting

Our Profile/Our Portfolio

2-3 Reporting period, frequency and contact point

2-4 Restatements of information

2-5 External assurance

2-6 Activities, value chain and other business relationships

2-7 Employees

2-8 Workers who are not employees

2-9 Governance structure and composition

2-10 Nomination and selection of the highest governance body

2-11 Chair of the highest governance body

2-12 Role of the highest governance body in overseeing the management 
of impacts

2-13 Delegation of responsibility for managing impacts

About This Report

Audit Report

Our Portfolio

People Performance

Governance Structure / 
Directors Report 

2-14 Role of the highest governance body in sustainability reporting

Material Topics

2-15 Conflicts of interest

Operating with Integrity

2-16 Communication of critical concerns

2-17 Collective knowledge of the highest governance body

Governance Structure / 
Stakeholder Engagement

Governance Structure / 
Directors Report

2-18 Evaluation of the performance of the highest governance body

Governance Structure

2-19 Remuneration policies

2-20 Process to determine remuneration

2-22 Statement on sustainable development strategy

2-23 Policy commitments

2-24 Embedding policy commitments

2-25 Processes to remediate negative impacts

2-26 Mechanisms for seeking advice and raising concerns

2-27 Compliance with laws and regulations

Remuneration Report

Our Approach to 
Sustainability

Governance Structure

Operating with Integrity / 
Grievance Management

Governance Structure / 
Stakeholder Engagement

Operating with Integrity

59 
—

AURELIA METALS   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
GRI DISCLOSURE

2-28 Membership associations

2-29 Approach to stakeholder engagement

WHERE TO FIND 
RELATED INFORMATION

SUSTAINABLE 
DEVELOPMENT GOAL

Stakeholder Engagement

2-30 Collective bargaining agreements

Remuneration Framework

GRI 3: Material Topics 2021  

3-1 Process to determine material topics

3-2 List of material topics

Material Topics

3-3 Management of material topics

GRI 201: Economic Performance 2016

201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed

Economic Contribution

201-2 Financial implications and other risks and opportunities due to 
climate change

Climate Change 

201-4 Financial assistance received from government

Operating with Integrity

GRI 203: Indirect Economic Impacts 2016

203-1 Infrastructure investments and services supported

GRI 204: Procurement Practices 2016

204-1 Proportion of spending on local suppliers

GRI 205: Anti-corruption 2016

205-2 Communication and training about anti-corruption policies 
and procedures

205-3 Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken

GRI 206: Anti-competitive Behaviour 2016

Community Investment 
and Development

Community Investment 
and Development

Operating with Integrity

206-1 Legal actions for anti-competitive behaviour, anti-trust, 
and monopoly practices

Operating with Integrity

GRI 207: Tax 2019

207-1 Approach to tax

207-2 Tax governance, control, and risk management

207-3 Stakeholder engagement and management of concerns related to tax

Operating with Integrity

207-4 Country-by-country reporting

60 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
GRI DISCLOSURE

GRI 302: Energy 2016

302-1 Energy consumption within the organization

302-3 Energy intensity

GRI 303: Water and Effluents 2018

303-1 Interactions with water as a shared resource

303-2 Management of water discharge-related impacts

303-3 Water withdrawal

303-4 Water discharge

303-5 Water consumption

GRI 304: Biodiversity 2016

304-1 Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected 
areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas

304-2 Significant impacts of activities, products and services on biodiversity

304-3 Habitats protected or restored

304-4 IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with 
habitats in areas affected by operations

MM2 Number and percentage of total sites identified as requiring biodiversity 
management plans according to stated criteria, and the number (percentage) 
of those sites with plans in place

GRI 305: Emissions 2016

305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions

305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions

305-4 GHG emissions intensity

305-5 Reduction of GHG emissions

GRI 306: Waste 2020

306-1 Waste generation and significant waste-related impacts

306-2 Management of significant waste-related impacts

306-3 Waste generated

306-4 Waste diverted from disposal

306-5 Waste directed to disposal

MM3 Total amounts of overburden, rock, tailings and sludges and their 
associated risks

WHERE TO FIND 
RELATED INFORMATION

SUSTAINABLE 
DEVELOPMENT GOAL

Climate Change

Water

Land and Biodiversity

Climate Change

Tailings Management / 
Waste Rock Management

61 
—

AURELIA METALS   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
GRI DISCLOSURE

GRI 308: Supplier Environmental Assessment 2016

WHERE TO FIND 
RELATED INFORMATION

SUSTAINABLE 
DEVELOPMENT GOAL

308-1 New suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria

308-2 Negative environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken

Economic Contribution

GRI 401: Employment 2016

401-1 New employee hires and employee turnover

People Performance

GRI 402: Labour/Management Relations 2016

MM4 Number of strikes and lock-outs exceeding one week’s duration, 
by country

Listening to our employees

GRI 403: Occupational Health and Safety 2018

403-1 Occupational health and safety management system

Management Systems

403-2 Hazard identification, risk assessment, and incident investigation

Risk Management / 
Management Systems

403-4 Worker participation, consultation, and communication on occupational 
health and safety

Safety Culture 

403-5 Worker training on occupational health and safety

403-6 Promotion of worker health

Growing our People 
to Grow with Us

Health and Wellbeing

403-7 Prevention and mitigation of occupational health and safety impacts 
directly linked by business relationships

Contractor Management

403-8 Workers covered by an occupational health and safety management 
system

Management Systems

403-9 Work-related injuries

403-10 Work-related ill health

GRI 404: Training and Education 2016

Safety Culture

404-2 Programs for upgrading employee skills and transition 
assistance programs

Training and development

404-3 Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career 
development reviews

Remuneration linked to 
performance

GRI 405: Diversity and Equal Opportunity 2016

405-1 Diversity of governance bodies and employees

People Performance

405-2 Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men

Remuneration linked to 
performance

GRI 406: Non-Discrimination 2016

406-1 Incidents of discrimination and corrective actions taken

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

GRI 407: Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining 

407-1 Operations and suppliers in which the right to freedom of association 
and collective bargaining may be at risk

Listening to our employees

GRI 408: Child Labour 2016

408-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of child labour

Operating with Integrity

62 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
GRI DISCLOSURE

GRI 409: Forced or Compulsory Labour 2016

WHERE TO FIND 
RELATED INFORMATION

SUSTAINABLE 
DEVELOPMENT GOAL

409-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or 
compulsory labour

Operating with Integrity

GRI 410: Security Practices 2016

410-1 Security personnel trained in human rights policies or procedures

Operating with Integrity

GRI 411: Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2016

411-1 Incidents of violations involving rights of indigenous peoples

MM5 Total number of operations taking place in or adjacent to Indigenous 
peoples’ territories, and number and percentage of operations or sites where 
there are formal agreements with Indigenous peoples’ communities

First Nations Engagement

GRI 413: Local Communities 2016

413-1 Operations with local community engagement, impact assessments, 
and development programs

MM6 Number and description of significant disputes relating to land use, 
customary rights of local communities and Indigenous peoples

MM7 The extent to which grievance mechanisms were used to resolve disputes 
relating to land use, customary rights of local communities and Indigenous 
peoples’, and the outcomes

MM8 Number (and percentage) of company operating sites where artisanal 
and small-scale mining takes place on, or adjacent to, the site; the associated 
risks and the actions taken to manage and mitigate these risks

MM9 Sites where resettlements took place, the number of households 
resettled in each, and how their livelihoods were affected in the process

GRI 414: Supplier Social Assessment 2016

414-1 New suppliers that were screened using social criteria

414-2 Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken

GRI 415: Public Policy 2016

Stakeholder Engagement / 
Community Investment and 
Development

First Nations Engagement / 
Grievance Management

Grievance Management

Economic Contribution

415-1 Political contributions

Operating with Integrity

Closure Planning

MM10 Number and percentage of operations with closure plans

Rehabilitation and Closure

63 
—

AURELIA METALS   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
MINERAL RESOURCE 
AND ORE RESERVE 
—

64 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023An aerial view of the environment 
surrounding the Peak Mine

65 
—

AURELIA METALSCOMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENTS 
— 

PEAK MINERAL 
RESOURCE ESTIMATE 
—

Compilation of the drilling database, assay validation and 
geological interpretations for the Peak Mineral Resource 
Estimate were completed by Chris Powell, BSc, MAusIMM, 
who is a full-time employee of Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd. 
The Mineral Resource Estimate has been prepared by 
Mr Powell who has sufficient experience which is relevant 
to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under 
consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to 
qualify as Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of 
the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, 
Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Powell consents 
to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on their 
information in the form and context in which it appears. 

DARGUES MINERAL 
RESOURCE ESTIMATE 
—

Compilation of the drilling database, assay validation and 
geological interpretations for the Dargues Mineral Resource 
Estimate was completed under the supervision of Timothy 
O’Sullivan, BSc (Hons), MAusIMM CP (Geo), who was a 
full-time employee of Aurelia Metals Limited during the 
relevant period. The Mineral Resource Estimate for Dargues 
was prepared by Mr O’Sullivan. Mr O’Sullivan has sufficient 
experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and 
type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which 
he is undertaking to qualify as Competent Persons as defined 
in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting 
of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. 
Mr O’Sullivan consents to the inclusion in this report of the 
matters based on their information in the form and context 
in which it appears.

FEDERATION MINERAL 
RESOURCE ESTIMATES 
—

Compilation of the drilling database, assay validation 
and geological interpretations for the Federation 
Mineral Resource Estimates as well as the Federation 
Mineral Resource Estimates were prepared by Timothy 
O’Sullivan, BSc (Hons), MAusIMM CP (Geo), who was a 
full-time employee of Aurelia Metals Limited during the 

relevant period. Mr O’Sullivan has sufficient experience 
which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of 
deposit under consideration and to the activity which they 
are undertaking to qualify as Competent Persons as defined 
in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting 
of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. 
Mr O’Sullivan consent to the inclusion in this report of the 
matters based on their information in the form and context 
in which it appears.

NYMAGEE MINERAL 
RESOURCE ESTIMATE 
—

Compilation of the drilling database, assay validation and 
geological interpretations for the Nymagee Mineral Resource 
Estimate was completed under the supervision of Timothy 
O’Sullivan, BSc (Hons), MAusIMM CP (Geo), who was a 
full-time employee of Aurelia Metals Limited during the 
relevant period. The Mineral Resource Estimate for Nymagee 
was prepared by Mr O’Sullivan. Mr O’Sullivan has sufficient 
experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and 
type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which 
he is undertaking to qualify as Competent Persons as defined 
in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting 
of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. 
Mr O’Sullivan consents to the inclusion in this report of the 
matters based on their information in the form and context 
in which it appears.

ORE RESERVE ESTIMATE – 
PEAK, DARGUES, FEDERATION 
—

The Ore Reserve Estimate was compiled by Justin Woodward, 
BEng (Mining), MAusIMM, who is a full-time employee 
of Aurelia Metals Limited. Mr Woodward has sufficient 
experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation 
and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity 
for which he is undertaking to qualify as Competent Person 
as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for 
Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and 
Ore Reserves’. Mr Woodward consents to the inclusion in this 
report of the matters based on their information in the form 
and context in which it appears.

66 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023MINERAL RESOURCE AND ORE RESERVE 
— 

The following is an excerpt from the Group's annual Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Statement (ASX Announcement: 
Group Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Statement) released to the market on 30 August 2023. All supporting information 
for the tables included in this Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve section of the 2023 Annual Report is included in that  
ASX Announcement. 

The Statement includes the 100%-owned Peak, Federation and Dargues Mines, along with Mineral Resource Estimates (MREs) 
for its 95%-owned Nymagee Project in New South Wales (NSW). 

The MREs and Ore Reserve estimates are reported in accordance with the guidelines of the 2012 Edition of the Australasian 
Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code 2012). Estimates are reported 
as at 30 June 2023.

Group MREs and Ore Reserve estimates are presented in Table 1 and Table 2. Estimates for each mine and deposit 
are summarised in Table 3 to Table 11.

Table 1. Group Mineral Resource Estimate as at 30 June 2023.

CLASS

Measured

Indicated

Inferred

Total

Tonnes 
(kt)

3,000

15,000

8,200

27,000

Cu 
(%)

0.9

1.4

1.7

1.4

Au 
(g/t)

2.6

1.1

0.5

1.0

Zn 
(%)

1.1

2.8

1.8

2.2

Pb 
(%)

0.9

1.8

1.0

1.4

Ag 
(g/t)

12

8

8

8

Note: The MRE is reported inclusive of Ore Reserves. There is no certainty that Mineral Resources not included in Ore Reserves will be converted to Ore 
Reserves. The Group MRE utilises A$120/t net smelter return (NSR) cut-off for mineable shapes that include internal dilution for Nymagee, Dargues, 
Federation and the majority of the Peak deposits with A$135/t NSR for Perseverance, Peak and Kairos. NSR is an estimate of the net recoverable value 
per tonne including offsite costs, payables, royalties and metal recoveries. Values are reported to two significant figures which may result in rounding 
discrepancies in the totals.

Table 2. Group Ore Reserve Estimate as at 30 June 2023.

CLASS

Proved

Probable

Total

Tonnes 
(kt)

NSR 
(A$/t)

940

4,500

5,500

270

290

290

Cu 
(%)

0.6

0.9

0.9

Au 
(g/t)

3.5

1.5

1.8

Zn 
(%)

1.6

5.4

4.7

Pb 
(%)

1.4

3.3

3.0

Ag 
(g/t)

9

7

7

Note: Values are reported to two significant figures which may result in rounding discrepancies in the totals.

67 
—

AURELIA METALSMINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES 
— 

Table 3. Peak Mine copper MRE as at 30 June 2023.

CLASS

Measured

Indicated

Inferred

Total

Tonnes 
(kt)

1,600

8,300

6,100

16,000

Cu 
(%)

1.3

1.8

2.1

1.8

Au 
(g/t)

2.0

1.0

0.5

0.9

Zn 
(%)

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.0

Pb 
(%)

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

Ag 
(g/t)

7

5

7

6

Note: The Peak Mine MRE is reported inclusive of Ore Reserves. The MRE utilises A$135/t NSR cut-off for Perseverance, Peak & Kairos and A$120/t NSR 
cut-off for all other deposits within mineable shapes that include internal dilution. Values are reported to two significant figures which may result in rounding 
discrepancies in the totals. 

Table 4. Peak Mine zinc-lead MRE as at 30 June 2023.

CLASS

Measured

Indicated

Inferred

Total

Tonnes 
(kt)

1,000

1,200

840

3,000

Zn 
(%)

3.3

5.3

5.0

4.6

Pb 
(%)

2.6

4.4

2.5

3.3

Cu 
(%)

0.7

0.5

1.0

0.7

Au 
(g/t)

2.8

1.7

0.5

1.8

Ag 
(g/t)

24

22

23

23

Note: The Peak Mine MRE is reported inclusive of Ore Reserves. The MRE utilises A$135/t NSR cut-off for Perseverance, Peak & Kairos and A$120/t NSR 
cut-off for all other deposits within mineable shapes that include internal dilution. Values are reported to two significant figures which may result in rounding 
discrepancies in the totals. 

Table 5. Dargues Mine MRE as at 30 June 2023.

CLASS

Measured

Indicated

Inferred

Total

Tonnes 
(kt)

350

360

140

850

Au 
(g/t)

5.0

3.0

3.4

3.9

Note: The MRE is reported inclusive of Ore Reserves. The MRE utilises A$120/t  
NSR cut-off mineable shapes that include internal dilution. Values are reported  
to two significant figures which may result in rounding discrepancies in the totals. 

Table 6. Federation Mine MRE as at 30 June 2023.

CLASS

Indicated

Inferred

Total

Tonnes 
(kt)

3,700

1,100

4,800

Zn 
(%)

9.0

8.9

9.0

Pb 
(%)

5.4

5.3

5.4

Cu 
(%)

0.3

0.2

0.3

Au 
(g/t)

1.1

0.2

0.9

Ag 
(g/t)

6

6

6

Note: The Federation MRE utilises A$120/t NSR cut-off mineable shapes that include internal dilution. Values are reported to two significant figures which 
may result in rounding discrepancies in the totals. 

68 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023Table 7. Nymagee Project MRE as at 30 June 2023.

CLASS

Indicated

Inferred

Total

Tonnes 
(kt)

1,900

50

1,900

Cu 
(%)

2.2

2.2

2.2

Au 
(g/t)

0.1

0.1

0.1

Zn 
(%)

1.1

0.5

1.1

Pb 
(%)

0.6

0.2

0.6

Ag 
(g/t)

16

11

16

Note: The Nymagee Project MRE utilises A$120/t NSR cut-off mineable shapes that include internal dilution. Values are reported to two significant figures 
which may result in rounding discrepancies in the totals.  

Figure 1. Change in Group Mineral Resource tonnage relative to 30 June 2022.

30,000

25,000

20,000

)
t
k
(

s
e
n
n
o
T

15,000

29,000

10,000

5,000

0

2  -

2

0

2

e

u r c

o

s

e

R

-1,700

-860

-1,400

1,900

60

27,000

e r a

H

e

D

s

n

p l e ti o

g   &   M

rilli n

D

e l  U

d

o

s

n

a t e

d

p

o

c

E

m i c   P

o

a r a m e t e r s

n t

s t m e

d j u

A

e

u r c

o

s

e

R

3  -

2

0

2

69 
—

AURELIA METALS 
ORE RESERVE ESTIMATES 
— 

Table 8. Peak Mine copper Ore Reserve Estimate as at 30 June 2023.

CLASS

Proved

Probable

Total

Tonnes 
(kt)

NSR 
(A$/t)

350

1,600

2,000

270

230

230

Cu 
(%)

1.3

1.9

1.8

Au 
(g/t)

3.0

1.5

1.7

Zn 
(%)

0.1

0.0

0.0

Pb 
(%)

0.1

0.0

0.0

Ag 
(g/t)

6

5

5

Note: The Peak copper Ore Reserve Estimate utilises A$80/t NSR cut-off for development and A$175-220/t NSR for stoping depending on mine area. 
Values are reported to two significant figures which may result in rounding discrepancies in the totals.  

Table 9. Peak Mine zinc-lead Ore Reserve Estimate as at 30 June 2023.

CLASS

Proved

Probable

Total

Tonnes 
(kt)

NSR 
(A$/t)

290

420

710

340

280

300

Zn 
(%)

5.1

6.8

6.1

Pb 
(%)

4.3

5.7

5.1

Cu 
(%)

0.5

0.4

0.4

Au 
(g/t)

3.6

1.8

2.6

Ag 
(g/t)

21

23

22

Note: The Peak zinc-lead Ore Reserve Estimate utilises A$80/t NSR cut-off for development and A$185-190/t NSR for stoping depending on mine area. 
Values are reported to two significant figures which may result in rounding discrepancies in the totals. 

Table 10. Dargues Mine Ore Reserve Estimate as at 30 June 2023.

CLASS

Measured

Inferred

Total

Tonnes 
(kt)

NSR 
(A$/t)

290

66

360

210

130

190

Au 
(g/t)

3.8

2.3

3.5

Note: The Dargues Ore Reserve Estimate utilises A$80/t NSR cut-off for development and A$120/t NSR cut-off for stoping. Values are reported to two 
significant figures which may result in rounding discrepancies in the totals. 

Table 11. Federation Mine Ore Reserve Estimate as at 30 June 2023.

CLASS

Proved

Probable

Total

Tonnes 
(kt)

NSR 
(A$/t)

0

2,400

2,400

0

350

350

Zn 
(%)

0

9.0

9.0

Pb 
(%)

0

5.3

5.3

Cu 
(%)

0

0.3

0.3

Au 
(g/t)

0

1.4

1.4

Ag 
(g/t)

0

6

6

Note: The Federation Ore Reserve Estimate utilises A$80/t NSR cut-off for development and A$175/t NSR cut-off for stoping. Values are reported to two 
significant figures which may result in rounding discrepancies in the totals. 

70 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023The change in the Group’s Ore Reserve Estimate relative to the prior (30 June 2022) published statement is presented in 
Figure 2. Positive drilling results at Chesney supported Mineral Resource conversion to Ore Reserve which, along with updated 
economic parameters, have mostly offset mining depletion at a Group level.

Figure 2. Change in Group Ore Reserve tonnage relative to 30 June 2022.

6,000

5,000

4,000

)
t
k
(

s
e
n
n
o
T

3,000

5,700

2,000

1,000

0

2  -

2

0

2

e

e r v

s

e

R

550

50

-590

650

-860

5,500

e r a

H

e

D

s

n

p l e ti o

rilli n

D

g   &   M

e l …

d

o

o

n

o

c

E

a r a m e t e r s

m i c   P

n t

s t m e

d j u

A

e

e r v

s

e

R

3  -

2

0

2

71 
—

AURELIA METALS 
72 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023FINANCIAL REPORT 
CONTENTS 
—

Company Information

Directors’ Report

Operations and Financial Review

Letter from the Chair of the Remuneration 
and Nomination Committee

Remuneration Report (Audited)

Auditor's Independence Declaration

Consolidated Financial Statements

Statement of Profit or Loss and 
Other Comprehensive Income

Consolidated Statement of  
Financial Position

Consolidated Statement of  
Changes in Equity

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

Notes to Financial Statements

Directors' Declaration

Independent Auditor’s Report to the 
Members of Aurelia Metals Limited

74

75

83

104

107

131

132

132

133

135

136

137

184

185

73 
—

AURELIA METALSCOMPANY 
INFORMATION 
—

AURELIA METALS LIMITED ABN 37 108 476 384

DIRECTORS 
—

The Company’s Directors in office during the year ended and until the date of this report are set out below. 

The Directors were in office for the entire period unless otherwise stated and other than the Managing Director & Chief Executive 
Officer (CEO) and Mr Franklyn (“Lyn”) Brazil (nominee Director), all Directors are deemed to be independent.

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS 

POSITION

TERM

Peter Botten

Susie Corlett 

Independent Non-Executive Chair 

Full Year 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Full Year 

Lawrence Conway

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Resigned 31 August 2022 

Bruce Cox 

Paul Harris 

Helen Gillies 

Bob Vassie 

Lyn Brazil

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Appointed 1 September 2022 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Full Year 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Full Year 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Full Year 

Non-Executive Director 

Appointed 17 July 2023

Bradley Newcombe

Alternate Director for Lyn Brazil

From 17 July 2023

Managing Director and CEO 

Resigned 18 November 2022 

Managing Director and CEO 

Appointed 6 June 2023 

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS 

Daniel Clifford 

Bryan Quinn 

COMPANY SECRETARY 

Rochelle Carey

Ian Poole

Appointed 28 December 2022

Retired 31 December 2022

The following report is submitted in 
respect of the results of Aurelia Metals 
Limited (‘Aurelia’ or ‘the Company’) 
and its subsidiaries, together the 
consolidated group (‘Group’), for the 
financial year ended 30 June 2023, 
together with the state of affairs of the 
Group as at that date.

The Board of Directors 
submit their report for the 
year ended 30 June 2023.

Registered office and principal 
place of business

Aurelia Metals Limited 
Level 17, 144 Edward Street,  
Brisbane QLD 4000 
GPO Box 7, Brisbane QLD 4001 
Telephone: (07) 3180 5000 
Email: office@aureliametals.com.au 
www.aureliametals.com

Share register

Automic Group 
Level 5, 126 Phillip Street,  
Sydney NSW 2000 
Investor services: 1300 288 664 
General enquiries: (02) 8072 1400 
Email: hello@automic.com.au 
www.automicgroup.com.au

Stock exchange listing

Aurelia Metals Limited shares are listed 
on the Australian Securities Exchange 
(ASX Code: AMI)

Auditors

Ernst & Young 
111 Eagle Street 
Brisbane QLD 4000

74 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023DIRECTORS  
REPORT 
—

1. DIRECTORS  
AND OFFICERS 
—

The names and details of the Company's Directors in office 
during the financial year and until the date of this report are 
set out below. Directors were in office for this entire period 
unless otherwise stated.

PETER BOTTEN  AC CBE

Independent Non-Executive Chair 

Appointed as a Director of the Company 
on 13 September 2021 and as Independent 
Non-Executive Chair on 4 November 2021

Mr Botten is a geologist by training, having over 45 years 
experience working in the resources sector. He was the 
Managing Director of Oil Search Limited from 28 October 
1994 until 25 February 2020, overseeing its development 
into a major Australian Securities Exchange-listed company. 
Peter has extensive worldwide experience in the oil and 
gas industry, holding various senior technical, managerial 
and board positions in a number of listed and government-
owned bodies. He has extensive experience in developing 
and financing major resource projects. He has a Bachelor 
of Science in Geology from the Royal School of Mines at 
Imperial College London.

During the past three years, Mr Botten has served 
as a Director of:

 Š AGL Energy Limited (ASX: AGL), appointed October 2016, 

resigned September 2022

 Š Karoon Energy Limited (ASX: KAR), appointed October 

2020, and

 Š Conrad Asia Energy Ltd (ASX: CRD), appointed 

1 November 2021.

SUSIE CORLETT

Independent Non-Executive Director

Appointed as a Director of the Company 
on 3 October 2018

Ms Corlett is a geologist with over 25 years’ experience 
in exploration, mining operations, mining finance and 
investment. Ms Corlett serves as a non-executive director 
of ASX listed Mineral Resources Ltd (ASX: MRL) and Iluka 
Resources Ltd (ASX: ILU) and also is a Trustee of the AusIMM 
Education Endowment Fund. 

During her executive career, Ms Corlett was an Investment 
Director for global mining private equity fund, Pacific Road 
Capital Ltd and worked in mining credit risk management and 
project finance for Standard Bank Limited, Deutsche Bank 
and Macquarie Bank. 

Ms Corlett has a Bachelor of Science (Hons. Geology) from 
the University of Melbourne, is a graduate of the Australian 
Institute of Company Directors, a Fellow of the AusIMM and 
a member of Chief Executive Women. 

During the past three years, Ms Corlett has served 
as a Director of: 

 Š Iluka Resources (ASX: ILU), appointed June 2020, and

 Š Mineral Resources (ASX: MRL), appointed January 2021.  

HELEN GILLIES

Independent Non-Executive Director

Appointed as a Director of the Company 
on 21 January 2021

Ms. Gillies is a corporate lawyer with over 30 years of 
experience in external and in-house legal counsel roles. 
This includes almost 20 years in various senior legal and risk 
management roles at major engineering company, Sinclair 
Knight Merz, including the role of General Counsel and 
General Manager Risk. 

Ms. Gillies is currently a non-executive director of 
Monadelphous Group Limited (ASX: MND), BAC HoldCo 
Pty Ltd (the holding company for Bankstown and Camden 
Airports), Lexon Insurance Pty Ltd and Yancoal Australia 
Limited (ASX: YAL). Ms. Gillies has undergraduate degrees 
in Commerce and Law, and Masters degrees in Business 
Administration and Law, and is a Fellow of the Australian 
Institute of Company Directors. 

During the past three years, Ms Gillies has served 
as a Director of:

 Š Monadelphous Group Limited (ASX: MND), appointed 

September 2016, and

 Š Yancoal Australia Limited (ASX: YAL), appointed 

January 2018. 

75 
—

AURELIA METALSDIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)

1. DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS (CONTINUED) 
—

PAUL HARRIS

BRUCE COX

Independent Non-Executive Director

Independent Non-Executive Director

Appointed as a Director of the Company 
on 17 December 2018

Appointed as a Director of the Company 
on 1 September 2022

Mr Harris has more than 27 years’ experience in financial 
markets and investment banking, including advising mining 
corporates on strategy, mergers and acquisitions, and capital 
markets, including as Managing Director - Head of Metals and 
Mining at Citi. 

Mr Harris has a Masters of Engineering (Mining) and a 
Bachelor of Commerce (Finance) and is a graduate of the 
Australian Institute of Company Directors.

During the past three years, Mr Harris has served 
as a Director of:

 Š Aeon Metals Limited (ASX: AML), appointed 

December 2014,

 Š Highfield Resources Limited (ASX: HFR), appointed 

March 2022, and

 Š Koonenberry Gold Limited (ASX: KNB), appointed 

August 2022. 

BOB VASSIE

Mr Cox has more than 40 years of global experience in 
the resources industry across the commodities of steel, 
platinum, iron ore, copper, aluminium and diamonds. He has 
held senior financial and executive leadership position, 
including Managing Director of Rio Tinto Diamonds where 
he had operational responsibility for the Argyle, Diavik, and 
Murowa mines, as well as the Bunder Development project 
in India. As CEO of Pacific Aluminium and later Managing 
Director, Rio Tinto Aluminium Pacific Operations, Mr Cox was 
responsible for various smelter, alumina refinery and bauxite 
operations across Australia and New Zealand, He also worked 
for BHP in both the Minerals and Iron Ore divisions, including 
as Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Escondida in Chile and CFO 
Hartley Platinum based out of Zimbabwe. Mr Cox is currently 
a director of Aluminium Bahrain (listed on the London and 
Bahrain stock exchanges) and on the Mining Advisory Board 
of Ajlan & Bros Holding group Abilitii.

Mr Cox is a Graduate of the Australian Institute of Company 
Directors and also holds a Bachelor of Commerce and Master 
of Business Administration from the University of Wollongong.

Independent Non-Executive Director

Appointed as a Director of the Company 
on 21 January 2021

Mr Vassie is a mining engineer with over 35 years’ experience 
in management and operational roles within the global 
resources industry. Most recently, he was Managing Director 
and CEO of St Barbara Limited (ASX: SBM) from 2014 to 
2020. Prior to that, Mr Vassie was Managing Director and 
CEO of Inova Resources Limited (ASX: IVA). He has also held 
various senior management and operational roles, with 
almost 20 years at Rio Tinto Limited (ASX: RIO). Mr Vassie 
is currently the non-executive chair of Ramelius Resources 
Limited (ASX: RMS) and a non-executive director of 
Federation Mining Pty Ltd.

During the past three years, Mr Vassie has served 
as a Director of:

 Š Ramelius Resources Limited (ASX: RMS), appointed 

January 2021.

LYN BRAZIL AM

Non-Executive Director

Appointed as a Director of the Company 
on 17 July 2023

Mr Brazil is a southern Queensland mixed farmer, investor 
and philanthropist, who was awarded a Member of the Order 
of Australia (AM) in the Queen’s Birthday 2022 Honours list. 
Mr Brazil received the title for his service to medical research 
and agriculture. 

Mr Brazil progressed from a small poultry farm on the 
Queensland – New South Wales border to owning four 
cropping properties at Brookstead and two cattle operations 
at Goondiwindi. Mr Brazil also boasts multiple successful 
investments in listed companies and created the Brazil Family 
Foundation which contributes to many medical and scientific 
research organisations.

Mr Brazil is a nominee Director of Brazil Farming Pty Ltd. 

76 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023DIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)

1. DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS (CONTINUED) 
—

BRADLEY NEWCOMBE 

ROCHELLE CAREY 

Alternate Director for Mr Brazil

Company Secretary

Appointed as Alternate Director of the Company 
on 17 July 2023

Appointed as Company Secretary 
on 28 December 2022

Ms Carey is a corporate lawyer with over 20 years’ experience 
in the legal sector, with a focus on energy and resources. 
Prior to joining Aurelia, Ms Carey was in-house counsel at 
Stanmore Resources Limited, Energex Limited and Glencore. 
Prior to moving in-house, she was a Senior Associate at 
Allens Linklaters (formerly Allens Arthur Robinson).

Ms Carey holds a Bachelor of Business (International 
Business) / Bachelor of Laws (QUT) and a Master 
of Laws (LSE).

Mr Newcombe is a key investment advisor for Mr Brazil. 
Mr Newcombe has over 25 years’ experience as an 
accounting and financial markets professional across 
treasury, fixed income and equities. Mr Newcombe has 
acted as an advisor to Brazil Farming since 2015.

BRYAN QUINN 

Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer

Appointed as a Director of the Company 
on 6 June 2023

Mr Quinn joined Aurelia as Managing Director and Chief 
Executive Officer in June 2023.

In the 12 months prior to his appointment at Aurelia, Mr Quinn 
led the Growth, Strategy, Exploration, Sales and Marketing 
businesses at Oz Minerals.

Prior to this, Mr Quinn spent more than 27 years with BHP, 
where he held a series of senior executive, operational 
and business improvement roles. This included President 
Joint Ventures Americas and Africa, Global Chief Technical 
Functions, and various Asset President and general 
management roles, across a range of commodities 
and businesses.

Mr Quinn has a Bachelor of Engineering (Mining Hons) and 
a Masters in Applied Finance and Investment with more than 
30 years’ experience across a broad range of commodities, 
geographies and operations, both mining and downstream.

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS WHO NO LONGER HOLD OFFICE  
AT THE DATE OF THIS REPORT ARE AS FOLLOWS:

DANIEL CLIFFORD

IAN POOLE

Managing Director and CEO resigned 
18 November 2022.

Chief Financial Officer & Company Secretary retired 
31 December 2022.

LAWRENCE CONWAY

Non-Executive Director resigned 31 August 2022.

77 
—

AURELIA METALS 
DIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)

2. DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS 
—

The interests of the Directors in the shares and other equity securities of the Company as at 30 June 2023 and as at 30 August 
2023 were:

DIRECTOR

Peter Botten 

Susie Corlett 

Paul Harris 

Bob Vassie 

Helen Gillies 

Bruce Cox 

Bryan Quinn 

Lyn Brazil

Bradley Newcombe

Total

ORDINARY SHARES AS AT  
30 JUNE 2023

ORDINARY SHARES AS AT  
30 AUGUST 2023

 -

 33,731

 -

 250,000

 250,000

 -

 50,000

290,104,300

8,025,000

298,713,031

-

33,731

-

317,205

317,205

-

513,441

319,357,179

8,035,000

328,573,761

On 5 July 2023, after the reporting period, the shares under the Retail Entitlement Offer were issued. As relevant interest 
holders, Mr Vassie, Ms Gillies, Mr Quinn, Mr Brazil and Mr Newcombe participated in the Retail Entitlement Offer. In addition, 
Mr Quinn acquired further shares on market during the period.

78 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023DIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)

3. MEETINGS OF DIRECTORS 
—

The number of Board of Director meetings and Board Committee meetings held during the year and each Director’s attendance 
at those meetings is set out below:

DIRECTORS’ 
MEETINGS

COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF THE BOARD:

Audit

Remuneration & Nomination

Sustainability & Risk

DIRECTOR

Peter Botten

Susie Corlett

Paul Harris

Bob Vassie

Helen Gillies

Bruce Cox

Bryan Quinn

FORMER DIRECTOR

Daniel Clifford

Lawrence Conway

(i)

18

18

18

18

18

15

1

7

3

(ii)

(i)

(ii)

(i)

(ii)

(i)

(ii)

18

18

18

18

18

14

1

7

3

-

4

4

-

-

3

-

-

1

-

4

4

-

-

3

-

-

1

-

-

6

6

6

-

-

-

-

-

-

6

6

6

-

-

-

-

-

5

-

5

5

-

-

-

-

-

5

-

5

5

-

-

-

-

(i)  Held – Indicates the number of Board meetings held during the period of a Director’s tenure or the in the case of Committee meetings, whilst 
the Director was a member of Committee. 

(ii)  Attended – Indicates the number of meetings attended by a Director. While non-member Directors are entitled to attend Committee meetings 
(subject to any conflicts), these attendances are not reflected in the above table. 

The members of the Board’s Committees at 30 June 2023 are:

Audit Committee: Bruce Cox (Chair), Susie Corlett and Paul Harris 

Remuneration and Nomination Committee: Paul Harris (Chair), Helen Gillies and Bob Vassie

Sustainability and Risk Committee: Susie Corlett (Chair), Helen Gillies and Bob Vassie

79 
—

AURELIA METALSDIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)

4. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 
—

During the financial year, the Company paid a premium in respect to a contract insuring the Directors of the Company, 
the Company Secretary(s), all executive officers of the Company, and of any related body corporate against a liability incurred 
to the extent permitted by the Corporations Act 2001. The contract of insurance prohibits disclosure of the nature of the liability 
and the amount of the premium.

The Company provides a Deed of Indemnity, Insurance and Access with Directors and Officers. In summary, the Deed provides 
for access to corporate records for each Director for a period after ceasing to hold office in the Company; the provision of 
Directors and Officers Liability Insurance; and an indemnity for legal costs incurred by Directors in carrying out the business 
affairs of the Company.

Except for the above the Company has not otherwise, except to the amount permitted by law, indemnified or agreed to 
indemnify an officer or auditor of the Company or of any related body corporate against a liability incurred, during or since 
the financial year.

5. INDEMNIFICATION OF AUDITORS 
—

To the extent permitted by law, the Company has agreed to indemnify its auditor as part of the terms of its audit engagement 
agreement against claims by third parties arising from the audit (for an unspecified amount). No payment has been made 
to indemnify the auditor during or since the financial year.

6. DIVIDENDS 
—

The Board of Directors did not declare a dividend for the year ended 30 June 2023 (30 June 2022: Nil).

7. CORPORATE STRUCTURE 
—

Aurelia Metals Limited is a company limited by shares that is incorporated and domiciled in Australia. The Aurelia Group 
(the ‘Group’) comprises of the following wholly owned subsidiaries:

ENTITY NAME

INCORPORATION DATE

Defiance Resources Pty Ltd

15 May 2006

Hera Resources Pty Ltd

20 August 2009

Nymagee Resources Pty Ltd

7 November 2011

Peak Gold Asia Pacific Ltd

26 February 2003

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

31 October 1977

Dargues Gold Mines Pty Ltd

12 January 2006

Big Island Mining Pty Ltd

3 February 2005

80 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023DIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)

8. PERFORMANCE RIGHTS 
—

As at 30 August 2023, there are 11,657,080 Performance Rights on issue. The Performance Rights are unlisted and have terms 
as set out below:

GRANT

GRANT 
DATE

EXPIRY OR 
TEST DATE

EXERCISE  
PRICE

BALANCE 
AT START 
OF YEAR

GRANTED 
DURING 
THE YEAR

VESTED 
DURING 
THE YEAR

EXPIRED 
DURING  
THE YEAR

BALANCE 
AT 30 
AUGUST

Class 19A

29-11-19

30-06-22

Class FY21 

19-11-20 

30-06-23 

Class FY21 

26-12-20 

30-06-23 

Class FY22 

04-11-21 

30-06-24 

Class FY22 

09-11-21 

30-06-24 

Class FY23 

08-12-22 

30-06-25 

Nil

Nil 

Nil 

Nil 

Nil 

Nil 

2,284,641 

1,696,714 

3,755,760 

1,866,231 

- 

- 

- 

- 

6,401,029 

31,198 

- 

11,544,184 

(380,759)

(1,903,882)

(197,045)

(1,499,669)

(260,830)

(3,494,930)

-

- 

- 

-

-

- 

(1,004,632)

861,599 

(3,905,046)

2,527,181 

(3,275,884) 

8,268,300 

Total

16,004,375 

11,575,382

(952,027)

(15,084,043) 

11,657,080 

The performance rights have various share price and operational performance measures. Refer to the Remuneration Report for 
further details. No performance right holder has any right under the performance right to participate in any other share issue of 
the Company or any other entity.

9. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS 
—

Refer to the Operations and Financial Review for information on future prospects of the Company. 

10. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND PERFORMANCE 
—

An environmental incident occurred at the Dargues Mine in July 2023 regarding a mine water tank overflowing into a nearby 
creek. A Clean Up Notice was issued to Big Island Mining Pty Ltd in July 2023 with respect to the incident. At the time of this 
report, the Environmental Protection Agency is still investigating the incident, which has the potential for further regulatory 
action or fines. 

The Directors are otherwise not aware of any environmental incidents during the year that would have a materially adverse 
impact on the Company. There were several minor non-compliances to development consent conditions during the year, all of 
which were reported to the relevant authorities as required. Immediate actions were taken to return the operation to compliance. 

No regulatory action or fines have been received by the Company in response to these minor incidents and due to the minor 
nature of the incidents, no such action is anticipated.

81 
—

AURELIA METALSDIRECTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUED)

11. CURRENCY AND ROUNDING OF AMOUNTS 
—

All references to dollars are a reference to Australian dollars ($A) unless otherwise stated. ($A) may be used for clarity.

Aurelia Metals Limited is a company of the kind referred to in ASIC Corporations (Rounding in Financial/Directors’ Reports) 
Instrument 2016/191 and in accordance with that instrument, amounts in the Financial/Directors’ Reports are rounded to the 
nearest thousand dollars, except when indicated otherwise. Due to rounding, numbers presented throughout this document may 
not add up precisely to the totals provided.

12. AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES 
—

During the year the Company’s auditor, Ernst & Young Australia provided non-audit services. The directors are satisfied that 
the provision of non-audit services is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the 
Corporations Act 2001. The nature and scope of each type of non-audit service provided means that auditor independence was 
not compromised.

The amounts received by Ernst & Young Australia for non-audit services are contained in Note 24 of the financial statements.

 Š The Company has obtained an independence declaration from its auditor, Ernst & Young, which forms part of this report. 

A copy of that declaration is included on page 131.

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.

Peter Botten AC CBE 
Non-Executive Chairman 

Bryan Quinn 
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer

Brisbane 
30 August 2023 

82 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW 
—

1. ABOUT AURELIA METALS LIMITED 
—

Aurelia Metals Limited (Aurelia) is an Australian mining and exploration company with a highly strategic 
landholding, two operating mines, and two development projects in New South Wales (NSW). 

The Peak Mine is in the northern Cobar Basin in central-west NSW, and the Dargues Mine is in the Southern Tablelands region. 
During the year the Company operated the Hera site, also located in the northern Cobar Basin. The mine closed in March 2023 
and the processing facility transitioned to care and maintenance in April 2023. 

Our growth ambition is to generate value and long-term returns for our stakeholders and shareholders. We hold one of the 
most geologically prospective ground positions in Australia and have the expertise and capability to discover and convert this 
endowment to unlock exceptional value.

Our exciting near term growth opportunities are the Federation zinc, lead, copper, gold and silver development project located 
near the Hera site, one of Australia’s highest grade base metal developments, and the Great Cobar copper-gold deposit located 
near the Peak Mine. 

2. GROUP STRATEGY 
—

Our vision is to be a developer and operator of choice for critical base metals to power a low carbon future and deliver superior 
shareholder value. 

DELIVER WITH 
CONFIDENCE

IMPROVE  
OUR OPERATING 
MARGIN

RIGHT PEOPLE, 
RIGHT MINDSET

FOCUSED 
GROWTH

 Š Develop integrated 
and robust plans 
with contingency.

 Š Clear accountability 
of targets across the 
organisation for all leaders 
and teams.

 Š Implement our 

management operating 
system and embed 
consistent processes.

 Š Make decisions based 
on data, then learn 
from the outcomes.

 Š Deploy plans that 

deliver our operational 
targets in a safe and 
sustainable manner.

 Š Drive investor 
engagement.

 Š Drive down costs and 
improve margins at 
all operations.

 Š Maximise utilisation of 

established infrastructure.

 Š Scale our organisation to 
endure through the cycle.

 Š Optimise metal recovery 

and extract full value from 
our products.

 Š Establish strategic 
partnerships and 
deliver value from 
our contract spend.

 Š Maximise 

shareholder value.

 Š Attract talent by 

 Š Increase mineral 

demonstrating a superior 
value proposition for 
our people.

 Š Cultivate leadership 
excellence through 
development, support 
and feedback.

 Š Anticipate workforce 
needs and grow a 
pipeline of talent through 
the development of 
our people.

 Š Create a one team culture 
by engaging people in the 
way we work.

endowment by expanding 
near mine and historic 
mineral resources 
in combination with 
regional discoveries.

 Š Optimise the Cobar 
Basin, including the 
effective use of assets 
and mineral inventories.

 Š Assess and act on third 
party opportunities.

 Š Accelerate growth through 
strategic partnerships.

83 
—

AURELIA METALSOPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

3. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 
—

FY23 represented a year of significant change for Aurelia. 
The Company acknowledged during the year that operational 
performance was unsatisfactory and took steps to address it. 
This included renewal of the Leadership team, closing the 
Hera Mine and placing the processing facility on care and 
maintenance, transitioning the Peak mine to owner mining, 
and implementing a Working Smarter program. 

All of these initiatives have contributed to an improved 
operating performance in the second half of FY23, and along 
with the appointment of a new CEO and Managing Director 
and a new financing facility, enables the Company to pursue 
its growth ambitions in the Cobar Basin.

Health, Safety and Sustainability

 Š Continued drive for improved safety culture. Group Total 
Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) of 5.13 at 
30 June 2023 (30 June 2022: 8.75), with 12 months’ 
recordable injury free at the Dargues Mine resulting in a 
site TRIFR of zero

 Š The 12 month moving average Reportable Environmental 
Incidents Frequency Rate (REIFR) reduced by 24% to 
30 June 2023 of 2.91 (30 June 2022: 3.81)

 Š In August 2023, the Company was awarded the 

Environmental Excellence award at NSW Minerals Council 
HSEC Awards. The award relates to the standardised 
reporting metric, Reportable Environmental Incidents 
Frequency Rate (REIFR) implemented across the Company

Production and Cost Performance

Growth

Federation

 Š The Federation Mine Feasibility Study was released on 

10 October 2022 and refined further in a project update 
on 13 April 2023, and confirms Federation as a high grade, 
capital efficient investment project that leverages existing 
infrastructure in the Cobar basin to generate significant 
shareholder value

 Š The project received State Significant Development 
consent from the NSW government in March 2023, 
with the remaining approvals now being finalised

 Š Subsequent to the announcement of the new Trafigura 

financing facility and accompanying equity raise on 31 May 
2023, the Company remobilised the mining contractor 
to the Federation site and development advance which 
recommenced on 1 August 2023

Dargues Mine

 Š Regulatory approval of a modification to the development 

consent was received on 20 December 2022 which 
increases the processing throughput limit from 355kt to 
415kt per calendar year

Great Cobar

 Š A material increase to the Great Cobar Mineral Resource 
was reported during H1 FY23. Tonnage increased 45% 
to 7.7Mt

 Š Group gold equivalent production of 145koz (FY22: 198koz)

Financial outcomes

 Š Group gold production of 86.3koz at an AISC of $2,315/oz 

 Š Cash at 30 June 2023 of $38.9 million 

(FY22: 98.5koz at $1,707/oz)

(FY22: $76.7 million)

 – Peak gold production of 36.3koz of gold at an AISC 
of $1,789/oz (FY22: 40.3koz at AISC of $1,520/oz)

 – Dargues gold production of 36.4koz of gold at an AISC 
of $2,280/oz (FY22: 41.7koz at ASIC of $2,039/oz)

 – Final ore from Hera was mined and processed in 

late March 2023, with the site transitioned to care 
and maintenance

 Š Group base metals production comprised Lead 19kt, 

Zinc 21kt, and Copper 2kt (FY22: Lead 24kt, Zinc 30kt 
and Copper 4kt)

 – By-product revenue decreased 31% to $145.4 million 
mainly driven by the completion of mining at Hera in 
March 2023, and lower base metals revenue generated 
by the Peak mine

 Š Balance sheet transformed with the execution of a new 
~$100 million financing facility with Trafigura Pte Ltd 
(“Trafigura”),

 – US$24 million Loan Note Advance (undrawn as at 

30 June 2023)

 – $65 million Environmental Performance Bond Facility

 Š $40 million equity raise competed with receipt of proceeds 
from the Institutional placement and entitlement offer in 
June 2023. Proceeds from the Retail entitlement offer 
received in July 2023

 Š Existing term loan fully repaid and performance bond 

facility fully cash backed. New performance bonds under 
the Trafigura facilities have now been issued and the cash 
backing of $56.8 million is in the process of being returned

 Š EBITDA* of $55.8 million (FY22: $166.47 million) 

* EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure and is unaudited. 

84 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

3. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (CONTINUED) 
—

3.1 PROFIT AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

The Group reports a statutory net loss after tax of $52.2 million for the year ended 30 June 2023. Included in the statutory 
net loss are some significant transactions which are not in the ordinary course of ongoing business activities. Such items are 
separately disclosed in the reconciliation between statutory profit and underlying profit. The underlying net profit or loss is 
presented to improve the comparability of the financial results between periods.

The result for the year ended 30 June 2023 in comparison to the prior year is summarised below: 

 NET PROFIT/(LOSS)

Sales revenue

Cost of sales

Gross profit

Impairment Expense 

Other income and expenses, net (i)

Net (loss)/profit before income tax and net finance expenses

Net finance expenses

Net (loss)/profit before income tax expense (ii)

Income tax expense/(benefit)

Net (loss)/profit after income tax (ii)

UNDERLYING NET PROFIT:

Net profit/(loss) before income tax expense

Add back:

Impairment Expense

Rehabilitation expense – (reversal)

Remeasurement of financial liabilities 

Underlying net (loss) / profit before income tax expense (ii)

Tax effect on underlying (loss)/profits for the year

Underlying net profit after tax expense (ii)

(i)   Other income and expenses, net, include admin and other expenses.

2023 
$’000

369,202

(403,000)

 (33,798)

(20,846)

(14,529)

(69,173)

(4,700)

(73,873)

21,652

(52,221)

2023 
$’000

(73,873)

20,846

(3,274)

3,195

(53,106)

15,422

(37,684)

2022 
$’000

438,815 

(416,366)

22,449

(135,687)

6,207

(107,031)

(7,007)

(114,038)

32,350 

(81,688)

2022 
$’000

(114,038)

135,687

3,531

        (27,131)

(1,951)

585

(1,366)

CHANGE 
%

(16)%

3%

(251)%

85%

(334)%

35%

33%

35%

(33)%

36%

CHANGE 
%

35%

 85%

(193)%

112%

(2,622)%

2,536%

(2,659)%

(ii)   Underlying net (loss)/profit reflects the statutory net (loss)/profit adjusted to present the Directors’ assessment of the result for the ongoing business 
activities of the Consolidated Entity. The presentation of non-IFRS financial information provides stakeholders with the ability to compare against prior 
periods in a consistent manner.

These measures have been presented to assist in the assessment of the relative performance of the Group from period to period. The calculations are based 
on non-IFRS information and are unaudited.

85 
—

AURELIA METALS 
OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

3. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (CONTINUED) 
—

3.1 PROFIT AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (CONTINUED)

Total sales revenue for the year was $69.6 million lower than the prior year. Lower gold sales revenue was driven by the closure 
of the Hera Mine in March 2023, lower gold grade at Dargues and lower processing throughput at Peak. The average realised 
gold price of A$2,697/oz (FY22: A$2,500/oz) was achieved. By-product revenue decreased by 31% to $145.4 million, driven 
mainly by the completion of mining at Hera in March 2023 and lower base metals revenue generated by the Peak Mine.

Total costs of sales were $13.4 million lower at $403.0 million (FY22: $416.4 million). This is a result of:

 Š Total ore mined decreased by 12% to 1.14 million tonnes (FY22 1.29MT) however there was a $26.8 million increase in cost 
of sales, largely attributed to the utilisation of opening ROM and concentrate stockpiles. General inflation costs have also 
impacted the business resulting in higher unit mining costs.

 Š The mining operations at the Hera Mine ceased and the process plant and surface infrastructure transitioned into care and 

maintenance during the period resulting in a reduction of cost of sales at Hera of $14.5 million compared to the previous year.

 Š Depreciation and amortisation expense (excluding Corporate) decreased by $33.8 million to $103.4 million 
(FY22: $137.2 million), the majority of the reduction was due to higher depreciation for Dargues in FY22. 

The tax benefit of $21.7 million equates to an effective tax rate of 29%.

3.2 GROUP EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST, TAX, DEPRECIATION AND AMORTISATION (EBITDA) 

The Group’s earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA), in comparison to the prior year, 
is summarised below: 

UNDERLYING GROUP EBITDA

Net (loss) /profit before income tax 
and net finance expenses 

Depreciation and amortisation 

Impairment expense 

EBITDA (i) 

Remeasurement of financial liabilities

Rehabilitation expense / (reversal)

Underlying EBITDA (ii)

2023 
$’000

(69,173)

104,130

20,846

55,803

3,195

(3,274)

55,724

2022 
$’000

(107,031)

137,816

135,687

166,472

(27,131)

3,531

142,872

CHANGE 
%

35%

(24)%

85%

(66)%

112%

(193)%

(61)%

(i) 

EBITDA (Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation) is a non-IFRS measure and not audited.

(ii)  Underlying EBITDA (non-IFRS measure) reflects statutory EBITDA as adjusted to present the Directors’ assessment of the result for the ongoing 

business activities of the Consolidated Entity. The presentation of non-IFRS financial information provides stakeholders the ability to compare against 
prior periods in a consistent manner. 

These measures have been presented to assist in the assessment of the relative performance of the Group from period to period. The calculations are 
based on non-IFRS information and are unaudited.

86 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

3. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (CONTINUED) 
—

3.3 CASH FLOW PERFORMANCE 

A summary of the Company’s cash flow for the year ended 30 June 2023, in comparison to the prior year, is summarised below:

GROUP CASH FLOWS

Cash flows from operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Net movement in cash

Net foreign exchange difference

Cash at the beginning of the year

Cash at the end of the year

2023 
$’000

45,864

(77,373)

(6,766)

(38,275)

527

76,694

38,946

2022 
$’000

154,093

(131,463)

(20,167)

2,463

(301)

74,532

76,694

CHANGE 
%

(70)%

41%

66%

(1,654)%

275%

3%

(49)%

The net cash inflows from operating activities for FY23 amounted to $45.9 million (FY22: $154.1 million), which represented 
a 70% decrease in comparison to the prior year.

The net cash outflow from investing activities for the year ended was $77.4 million (FY22: $131.5 million). The key investing 
activities include:

 Š Sustaining property, plant and equipment and mine capital expenditure, excluding lease payments, of $11 million 

(FY22: $56.5 million)

 Š Growth capital of $28.3 million (FY22: $19.1 million)

 Š Exploration and evaluation of $11 million (FY22: $32.5 million), and

 Š Guarantee Facility cash cover deposits paid of $26.0 million (FY22: $22.1 million), with the total balance of $56.8 million in the 

process of being returned.

The net cash outflow from financing activities for the year ended of $6.8 million (FY22: outflows of $20.2 million) includes the 
following key activities: 

 Š Inflow of $22.3 million net of share issue costs relating to the Institutional placement and entitlement offer component of the 
$40 million equity raise announced on 31 May 2023 (the balance from the Retail entitlement offer was received in July 2023)

 Š Term loan repayments totaling $20.7 million (FY22: $16.2 million) which resulted in the facility being totally repaid 

on 30 June 2023 

 Š Financing arrangements for new mobile plant and equipment of $3.0 million, (FY22: $7.3 million), and early repayment 

of $3.0 million, and 

 Š Lease principal repayments of $9.4 million (FY22: $ 10.7 million).

87 
—

AURELIA METALSOPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

3. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (CONTINUED) 
—

3.4 GROUP OPERATIONAL SUMMARY 

The key operating results for the Group are summarised below: 

Production volume 

Gold 

Silver

Copper - contained metal

Lead - contained metal

Zinc - contained metal

Sales volume 

Gold doré and gold in concentrate

Silver doré and silver in concentrate

Payable copper in concentrate

Payable lead in concentrate

Payable zinc in concentrate

Average prices achieved (i)

Gold

Silver

Copper

Lead

Zinc

All in sustaining cost (ii)

(i)  After realised hedge gains/losses

oz

oz

t

t

t

oz

oz

t

t

t

A$/oz

A$/oz

A$/t

A$/t

A$/t

A$/oz

2023 
$’000

86,254

352,343

2,188

18,998

20,548

84,240

271,479

2,898

17,100

15,753

2,697

34

12,092

3,351

4,493

2,315

2022 
$’000

CHANGE 
%

98,461

788,840

3,726

24,266

30,067

92,448

593,271

2,632

23,549

25,305

2,500

32

13,124

3,032

4,692

1,707

(12)%

(55)%

(41)%

(22)%

(32)%

(9)%

(54)%

10%

(27)%

(38)%

8%

6%

(8)%

11%

(4)%

(36)%

(ii)  All-in Sustaining Costs (AISC) is a non-IFRS measure and is not audited. Group AISC includes Site Costs (mining processing, administration, changes in 
inventory), royalty, transport and smelter expenses, by-product credits (silver, copper, lead & zinc sales), sustaining capital, corporate costs, divided by 
gold sold during the year.

3.5 PEAK MINE OPERATIONAL SUMMARY

Our Peak Mine is located in the northern Cobar Basin, south of Cobar in central-west NSW. The current operation commenced 
production in 1992.

Mining performance at Peak was below expectation during FY23 and was the result of a year of significant change. A transition 
to majority owner-mining commenced in the September 2022 quarter and was completed in the March 2023 quarter following 
full demobilisation of the mining contractor. Cost performance at Peak improved in the March and June quarters and with the 
addition of a second jumbo which was transferred from Dargues, and the purchase of a new underground haul truck in June 
2023 quarter, which sets up the operation to increase mining rates and drive down mining unit costs in FY24. 

Milling operations at Peak were also scaled back to approximately 550kpta in the September quarter by moving to a weekday 
roster to match mining rates and reduce plant operating costs. The plant also received upgrades to the lead/zinc circuit to 
increase base metal recoveries.

88 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

3. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (CONTINUED) 
—

3.5 PEAK MINE OPERATIONAL SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Drilling at Peak Mine is currently focused on further extensions of the existing orebodies, including the Kairos and Peak North 
deposits, and testing the potential high-value line-of-lode targets.

Construction of the Stage 5 Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) embankment raise was completed in February 2023 and provided 
capacity for approximately five years of ore processing.

The key performance metrics for the Peak Mine are tabulated below.  

PEAK MINE

Ore processed

Gold grade 

Silver grade

Copper grade

Lead grade 

Zinc grade 

Gold recovery 

Production Volume

Gold production 

Silver production

Copper production 

Lead production 

Zinc production 

t

g/t

g/t

%

%

%

%

oz

oz

t

t

t

AISC (All in sustaining cost) * 

A$/oz

*AISC is a non-IFRS measure and is unaudited.

2023

494,125

2.46

15.0

0.74

3.48

4.02

92.8

36,279

203,981

2,188

14,416

13,302

1,789

2022

608,647

2.27

16.9

0.88

2.86

3.18

90.6

40,322

263,546

3,726

13,441

12,273

1,520

CHANGE 
%

(19)%

8%

(11)%

(16)%

22%

26%

3%

(10)%

(23)%

(41)%

7%

8%

(18)%

The Peak Mine’s total gold sold during the year was 34,137 oz at an AISC of $1,789/oz (FY22: 39,201 oz at an AISC of $1,520/oz). 
The reduction in the quantity of gold sold during the year is reflective of the lower mined tonnes and grade. Lower sales of 
copper, lead and zinc were also driven by lower tonnes mined, offset somewhat by higher lead and zinc grades. 

Sustaining capital for the year was $7.5 million (FY22: $42.6 million) which includes the purchase of a jumbo and haul truck. 
Total Growth capital expenditure for the year ended was $10.6 million (FY22: $11.5 million) which included construction work 
to raise the Stage 5 TSF embankment. 

89 
—

AURELIA METALS 
OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

3. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (CONTINUED) 
—

3.6 DARGUES MINE OPERATIONAL SUMMARY 

Our Dargues Mine is a gold mining and milling operation located in the Southern Tablelands region of NSW, approximately 60km 
south-east of Canberra and a short drive from the town of Braidwood.

Total gold produced during the year was 36,358 ounces. Ore processed was higher than the prior year at 370kt (FY22: 365kt) 
as a result of receiving approval in December 2022 to increase the annual processing cap on the mill from 355kt to 415kt. 
More than offsetting that benefit was a 14% reduction in gold grade to 3.21g/t. A total of 36,616 oz of gold sold, with an AISC 
of $2,280/oz (FY22: 37,098 oz of gold sold, with an AISC of $2,039/oz). 

Construction of the Stage 3 TSF embankment lift was completed in August 2022, providing an immediate increase in tailings 
and water storage capacity. Additionally, the NSW regulator approved a modified water management plan which allowed for the 
use of TSF supernatant water for pasture irrigation and dust suppression until October 2023.

The Dargues Life of Mine planning which began in the December quarter was completed by the end of the financial year and 
it is now anticipated that mining will be completed at Dargues in H1 FY25. Dargues management has taken steps to ensure the 
strong planned cash contribution from the asset until the end of its mine life is realised. A retention program for both employees 
and contractors is now in place to provide the workforce with greater incentive to remain at Dargues through to the end of 
mine operations.

Sustaining capital invested during the year was $9.4 million (FY22: $18.9 million) excluding sustaining leases, which was largely 
related to mine development.

DARGUES MINE

Ore processed

Gold grade 

Gold recovery 

Production Volume

Gold production

t

g/t

%

oz

AISC (All in sustaining cost) * 

A$/oz

* AISC is a non-IFRS measure and is unaudited.

12 MONTHS TO 
30 JUNE 2023

PERIOD FROM 17 
DECEMBER 2022 TO 
30 JUNE 2022

CHANGE 
%

370,324

365,243

3.21

95.1

36,358

2,280

3.72

95.4

41,661

2,039

1%

(14)%

(1)%

(13)%

(12)%

90 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

3. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (CONTINUED) 
—

3.7 HERA MINE OPERATIONAL SUMMARY 

Our Hera site is located approximately 100km south-east of Cobar in central-west New South Wales. Due to several quarters of 
negative cash flow, a new life of mine plan was finalised in the December quarter, focusing on cash generation. This plan resulted 
in mining operations ceasing in March 2023, with the mine shut and the process plant and surface infrastructure transitioned 
into care and maintenance in April 2023. 

Hera delivered exceptional performance in its final quarter of operation with higher ore processed, gold grade and gold recovery 
resulting in a particularly strong 43% increase in gold production, exceeding expectations from the revised Life of Mine plan.

Since its commissioning in 2014, Hera produced 3.2 million tonnes of ore, supported 180 full time jobs, and contributed 
A$216 million to the local economy.

The key performance metrics for the Hera Mine are tabulated below: 

HERA MINE

 Ore processed 

 Gold grade 

 Silver grade 

 Lead grade 

 Zinc grade 

 Gold recovery 

Production Volume

 Gold production 

 Silver production 

 Lead production 

 Zinc production 

t

g/t

g/t

%

%

%

oz

oz

t

t

AISC (All in sustaining cost) *

A$/oz

* AISC is a non-IFRS measure and is unaudited.

3.8 FEDERATION PROJECT 

2023

282,014

1.63

17.51

1.79

2.80

91.98

13,616

148,362

4,582

7,247

2,923

2022

335,102

1.79

54.7

3.45

5.59

85.5

16,478

525,294

10,824

17,794

625

CHANGE

(16)%

(9)%

(68)%

(48)%

(50)%

8%

(17)%

(72)%

(58)%

(59)%

(368)%

The Federation deposit hosts high-grade zinc, lead, and gold mineralisation and is located approximately 10km south of our 
Hera site. Project development will involve the underground mining of the Federation deposit for treatment through established 
processing circuits at our Peak and Hera sites.

During the year, Aurelia completed the Federation Feasibility Study (FS) and announced the outcomes of the FS in October. 
In conjunction with the FS, Aurelia declared a maiden Ore Reserve of 2.2Mt at 8.9% Zn, 5.3% Pb, 1.4g/t Au, 6g/t Ag, and 0.3% Cu.

The FS demonstrated a strong technical and economic case for development based on a low risk milling strategy that utilises 
existing processing asset, which substantially reduces capital and execution risk and accelerates production ramp-up. The 
project had a robust economic case with a projected NPV of A$415M and IRR of 71% at the prevailing spot metal prices utilised 
in the FS (as at 5 August 2022, being US$1,800/oz gold, US$20/oz silver, US$1,984/t lead, US$3,527/t zinc, US$7,716/t copper 
and 0.70 A$/US$).

91 
—

AURELIA METALSOPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

3. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (CONTINUED) 
—

3.8 FEDERATION PROJECT (CONTINUED)

On 13 April 2023, the Company released an update to the Federation Project scope, timeline and capital cost estimate to capture 
opportunities associated with the transition of the nearby Hera surface facilities to care and maintenance. Compared to the 
October 2022 release of the Federation FS, several valuable project enhancements were identified, including:

Improved path to first production

 Š Updated mine design delivers earlier stope ore production.

 Š Initial ore trucked to the Company’s Peak processing plant which improves concentrate payabilities by producing separate 

zinc and lead concentrate products.

 Š Restart of the Hera process plant able to be delayed until capacity at Peak is fully utilised.

Lower capital expenditure compared to the FS

 Š Capital expenditure to first production stope ore lower at A$76 million (FS: A$88 million) and total growth capital lower 

at A$143 million (FS: A$145 million).

 Š Leveraging existing Hera mining assets and camp infrastructure lowers capital spend and de-risks execution.

 Š Improvements have more than offset the impact of industry capital cost inflation since the FS.

 Š Deferral of project spend associated with tailings filtration and waste backfill plant.

Updated mine design improves efficiency and operability

 Š Optimised mine design reduces total development metres.

 Š Shallower decline gradient improves trucking efficiency.

 Š Figure-8 decline design provides better orebody strike coverage and improved infill drilling platforms.

A compelling base metals development project and significant Aurelia value

 Š Net Present Value (using a 7% discount rate) of A$354 million at spot prices.

 Š Total mill feed of 4.0Mt for 8-year initial production life; expected average annual steady state recovered metal production 

of 45kt zinc, 46kt lead, 1kt copper, 15koz gold and 39koz silver.

 Š Long-term fundamentals for zinc remaining strong.

 Š Deposit remains open in multiple directions with substantial potential for Resource extension and conversion from planned 

underground and surface drilling.

On 3 March 2023, Aurelia received Development Consent from the New South Wales Department of Planning and Environment 
for the Federation Project. 

Project Development

The first exploration decline development blast occurred on 12 September 2022 after finalisation of the boxcut excavation and 
wall support. Approximately 90m of exploration decline development was achieved prior to activities pausing in October to allow 
for an appropriate financing structure to be put in place. 

Preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Amendment, along with the Company’s formal Response to 
Submissions, was completed in September 2022 with a draft submitted to the NSW Department of Planning and Environment 
(DPE) for adequacy review. Lodgement of the EIS Amendment occurred in October 2022. 

92 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

3. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (CONTINUED) 
—

3.8 FEDERATION PROJECT (CONTINUED)

On 31 May 2023, Aurelia announced it had secured a funding solution to enable the restart of development at Federation, 
with preparations to resume site activities initiated in early June. This work included: 

 Š the preparation of the Safety Management System and Remobilisation Plan, 

 Š mobilisation of Redpath’s workforce and equipment (from mid-July) which enabled decline development mining to resume on 

1 August 2023,

 Š preparing tenders for several critical path work packages including surface shaft raiseboring and public road upgrade construction,

 Š optimising the flotation and tailings filtration testwork to inform detailed engineering and design work. 

Submissions for secondary approvals required under the project’s Development Consent were well advanced by the end 
of the financial year.

Exploration and Mineral Resource

Following on from the infill drill program that was completed in late FY22, a substantial program of core processing, assaying 
and interpretation was conducted during early FY23, which included some exceptional drilling results that were reported 
after the cut-off date for the resource model used for the FS (see ASX release titled: Spectacular intercepts at Federation dated 
15 August 2022). The updated Mineral Resource Estimate at 30 June 2023 incorporates these results with conversion of Inferred 
to Indicated Mineral Resource due to improved estimation confidence.

The Company will conduct further infill drilling and extensional drilling from underground platforms targeting depth extensions 
of known mineralisation once the Federation exploration decline is sufficiently advanced in FY24. Surface exploration is planned 
for reinstatement in FY24 targeting along strike positions to known mineralisation. The Federation deposit remains open and/or 
very sparsely drilled along strike and at depth, which will be the focus of future exploration drilling. 

3.9 GREAT COBAR

The Great Cobar copper deposit is located in close proximity to the Peak Mine complex, approximately seven kilometres north 
of the Peak Mine’s processing facility and is approximately one and a half kilometres north of the New Cobar Mine.  

The Great Cobar Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) and maiden Ore Reserve was released in January 2022. The mine development 
uses a layout that incorporates responses from community consultation and information from assessments prepared for the 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the New Cobar Complex. A Feasibility Study is planned to be completed during FY24.

The Great Cobar Project comprises:

 Š Establishment of a new satellite underground mine which would deliver ore to the Peak Mine process plant

 Š Excavation of twin underground access declines and a return air raise to access the deposit from the existing New Cobar 

Mine workings

 Š Longhole stoping mining methods with waste rock backfill in the copper dominant portion of the deposit

 Š Initial mining and processing expected to take place over an approximate six-year life (400-500ktpa) to deliver a total of 

66kt copper and 92koz gold

 Š A Mineral Resource of 8,400kt of Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource at average grades of 2.1% copper and 0.6g/t gold 

for the copper dominant portion of the deposit, and

 Š A Probable Ore Reserve estimate of 1,100kt at 2.1% copper, 1.2g/t gold and 4g/t silver as part of the Peak Mine Ore Reserve.

The Great Cobar deposit remains open both up-plunge and down-plunge. Further testing of the mineralised extents of the 
deposit will be facilitated by underground drill platforms that will be accessed from the planned mine workings.

The Company has prioritised development of the Federation Project and intends to commence mining activities at Great Cobar 
after Federation commences production. 

93 
—

AURELIA METALSOPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

4. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION 
—

Aurelia’s exploration and evaluation activities continue to unlock exceptional value. Targeted exploration and resource definition 
drilling has delivered strong results within Aurelia’s highly prospective tenement holding. While the Company is committed to 
investing in future growth, exploration activities were minimised in FY23 whilst the refinance process was completed. Now that 
financing is in place, exploration will ramp up with a focus on near-mine and regional exploration targets in the Cobar Basin.

4.1 COBAR DISTRICT (PEAK MINE)

Kairos

The high grade gold Kairos discovery was announced in early 2019 and was brought into production in June 2021. The Kairos 
deposit is situated below the Peak Mine workings, around 700 metres to the north and slightly deeper than the Chronos lode, 
with a similar steeply plunging geometry.

At Kairos further drilling was completed in FY23 to test the northern strike extent of the deposit. The drilling took place in a 
new area in upper north Kairos where an overlap occurs between the Kairos lens and the Peak North orebody. Whilst minor 
extensions to known mineralisation were identified, drilling has now discontinued in this area. 

In FY24 drilling is now planned along the southern strike extent and down dip at Kairos where strong mineralisation 
has been encountered at depth ~200m down-dip of current mine workings. Exploration drilling will aim to extend this 
mineralisation further.

Perseverance

Three exploration drill programs were undertaken at the Perseverance orebody to test extensions of Upper Chronos, Zone A 
(North Perseverance), and Perseverance Deeps. Each drill program was undertaken or initiated during late FY23 and assay 
results are expected in the 1st quarter of FY24. 

Burrabungie

The Burrabungie area is located 100m south of the Chesney orebody within the Proteus complex of the Cobar District. Historic 
drilling indicated a high potential for extension of known copper mineralisation in the area within close proximity to mine 
workings at the Chesney Mine.

Two drill programs were undertaken during FY23 with a surface program at Burrabungie (see ASX announcement titled: 
“Exploration Update – Cobar District” released 20 March 2023) and the Chesney South underground drill program.

The Burrabungie program intersected significant intervals of copper mineralisation and has been included as a maiden Resource 
Estimate in the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve report at 30 June 2023.

The Chesney South program was completed during the last quarter of FY23 which was designed to drill an untested corridor 
between the Chesney orebody and the Burrabungie orebody. Assay results for this program are pending.

Queen Bee

The Queen Bee area is located 10km south of the Peak Mine Complex and is a historic deposit composed of a copper lens and a 
lead-zinc lens which discontinued operations in 1910.

The Company gained land access to this area in FY23 and initiated a first pass maiden exploration drilling campaign in the March 
quarter. The drill program was designed to test the location of historic workings, support existing drilling intervals conducted 
in 1966, and assess for extensions to existing mineralisation in the upper area of the copper lens (see ASX announcement titled 
“Exploration Update – Cobar District 20 March 2023” released on 20 March 2023). Further exploration drilling is planned for 
FY24 that will test deeper positions in the deposit and target extensions of the copper and lead-zinc lenses.

94 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

4. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION (CONTINUED) 
—

4.2 NYMAGEE DISTRICT (HERA – FEDERATION)

The region encompassing the Hera-Federation Complex is the vicinity of the historic mining town of Nymagee.

The Federation deposit was discovered in this area and its prospectivity is described in Section 3.1. During FY24, Aurelia plans to 
deploy a surface drill rig to test step-out targets along the Federation line of lode to the east and west to test repeat positions of 
the North North-East plunging lenses at Federation.

As part of the Company’s FY23 regional exploration program, Aurelia conducted induced polarisation (IP) surveys at the Piney, 
Vaucluse, Lyell and Ironbark prospects in the Nymagee district (see ASX announcement titled “Survey Results” released on 
18 January 2023). Encouraging chargeability anomalies were defined at each project area. In addition to these prospects, which 
will be considered for further testing with drilling, the Sir Lancelot prospect was identified as a priority for drilling due to the 
magnitude of the chargeability response. High density soil sampling will be undertaken over the prospects in preparation for 
further drill testing in the future.

The historic Nymagee Mine will be reviewed and drill tested in the future as part of the reinstatement to exploration activities 
and review of the historic deposit. Nymagee Mine is located within 5km north of the Hera Deposit and represents an opportunity 
for additional mine feed in the Cobar Basin. The Nymagee Mine area is highly prospective and has the potential for resource 
extension and discovery of new lenses.

4.3 BRAIDWOOD DISTRICT (DARGUES)

The Dargues region and Braidwood District remains highly prospective. Further extensional drilling and infill drilling has been 
completed on the Dargues ore body along strike to the east and west of the main Bonanza lode, and Ruby Lode, along with down 
dip extensional drilling under Zone 15, Zone 8b and Plums Lode. Results have provided some upside to the existing resource 
however have been insufficient to establish further resources in near-mine positions. Drilling conducted on targeted gold in 
soil geochemical anomalies coincident with chargeability anomalies at Copper Ridge and Thompsons Lode areas were positive, 
however, failed to return economically mineable significant intersections and the areas have been downgraded in prospectivity 
(located to the northwest and south of Dargues respectively). 

Future exploration work will be focused on near mine regional drilling to contribute to mine life but will also incorporate 
geological system analysis to understand the deposit in greater detail and improve the prospectivity in a regional geological 
setting. Regional exploration activities will be initiated to assess satellite mineralisation, including Snobs Mine and Doubloon 
(all located within 1km of the Dargues Mine).

4.4 OTHER NEAR-MINE AND REGIONAL EXPLORATION

The Company’s exploration tenements remain highly prospective and are held over multiple jurisdictions. 

Aurelia has conducted a comprehensive campaign of geophysical, geochemical and geological data compilation, review 
and target generation activities to position the department for a sustained greenfield campaign to be conducted in FY24. 
A significant increase in the implementation of land access agreements in FY23 has resulted in large tracts of highly prospective 
ground becoming accessible for FY24 in support of target generation activities.

For further detail, including drill results, refer to the Aurelia website (www.aureliametals.com.au). 

95 
—

AURELIA METALSOPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

5. CORPORATE 
—

5.1 BALANCE SHEET

Total assets for the Group at 30 June 2023 have decreased by $117.9 million to $444.4 million (30 June 2022: $562.3 million), 
driven by depreciation and amortisation charges that were in excess of capital expenditure. In FY23 the Company also 
recognised impairment of exploration assets and the carrying value of Hera. The Group net assets decreased by $27.1 million to 

$309.8 million at 30 June 2023 (30 June 2022: $336.9 million). 

THE MAIN EVENTS AND MOVEMENTS DURING THE YEAR INCLUDE:

Assets

 Š Closing cash of $38.9 million reflected part of the refinance announced on 31 May 2023. 

The remainder of proceeds relating to the refinance were received in early FY24.

 Š The restricted cash balance increased to $56.8 million at 30 June 2023 (FY22: $30.7 million) and 
represents full cash backing of the issued performance bonds under the existing debt facility. 
In August 2023 the performance bonds were replaced with new bonds under the Trafigura facility 
and the cash backing is in the process of being returned.

 Š Investment in Exploration and Evaluation continued in FY23 but at a lower rate with $11.0 million 

invested for the year (FY22: $32.6 million), comprising spend at Federation, Great Cobar, Dargues 
and other regional targets (refer to note 11 of the Financial Statements).

 Š Mine properties assets totalling $143.1 million (FY22: $123.5 million) 

 Š Investment in Property, plant and equipment of $10.9 million (FY22: $31.1 million) (refer to note 9 

of the Financial Statements).

Liabilities

 Š During FY23 the interest bearing term loan under the existing secured Syndicated Facilities 
Agreement (as detailed in Section 5.2) was repaid in full (FY22: $19.3 million outstanding), 
as well as $3.1 million relating to chattel mortgages initiated during the year for new mobile plant 
(FY22: $6.7 million).

 Š Other financial liabilities totalling $7.5 million pertains to future third party royalties payable 

(FY22: $11.1 million) (refer to note 16 of the Financial Statements). 

 Š Decrease in total rehabilitation provisions of $10.7 million is mostly attributable to a decrease in the 

associated fair value calculation at 30 June 2023.

Equity

 Š No dividends were paid or declared.

 Š An equity raise of $40 million was announced on 31 May 2023 as part of the Company’s refinance.  

At 30 June 2023 $22.3 million (net of fees) had been received relating to the institutional placement 
and entitlement offer, with the remaining proceeds of $15.6 million (net of fees) from the retail 
entitlement offer received in early July 2023.

5.2 FINANCING

On 31 May 2023 a new financing facility was announced with Trafigura Pte Ltd along with a $40 million equity raise. The new 
Trafigura facilities (the “Facilities”) comprise:

 Š US$24 million Loan Note Advance (“Loan Note”) facility to contribute funding to construction of Federation, and 

 Š A$65 million Environmental Bond Facility (“Bond Facility”) to provide rehabilitation bonding.

The Facilities have a term of 4 years from the date of financial close. The Loan Note has an interest rate of SOFR (Secured 
Overnight Financing Rate) + 6.0% and the Bond Facility has an interest rate of 6.0%. The Facilities have no financial covenants, 
no hedging requirements and have early repayment flexibility. Trafigura has been granted 120 million warrants over Aurelia 
shares with an exercise price of A$0.25/share and a four year term.

96 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

5. CORPORATE (CONTINUED) 
—

5.2 FINANCING (CONTINUED)

Accompanying the Facilities is a concentrate offtake agreement with Trafigura that commences 1 January 2024 for a total of 
700,000 dry metric tonnes of any combination of zinc, lead and copper concentrate produced from the Peak Processing Plant. 
As part of the Facilities there is an undertaking to maintain a ratio of future concentrate deliveries under the offtake agreement 
to the balance of amounts outstanding on the Facilities.

The Facilities were supported by a fully underwritten A$40 million equity raising via an institutional placement and 1 for 
3.72 pro rata accelerated non-renounceable entitlement offer (“Entitlement Offer”). The proceeds from the institutional 
placement and entitlement offer were received in June 2023. The balance of the raising relating to the retail entitlement offer 
was received in early July 2023.

In June 2023 the existing secured Syndicated Facilities Agreement was repaid in full, and the existing performance bond 
facility was fully cash backed. Total cash backing at 30 June 2023 was $56.8 million, with the full amount in the process of 
being returned.

5.3 HEDGING

The Company acknowledges that a prudent hedging strategy is an important element of financial risk management and 
overarching enterprise risk management. Whilst at 30 June 2023, the Company had no existing commodity price hedge 
contracts on foot, the Company actively managed commodity price risk throughout FY23 through forward contracts and 
quotation period hedging. It is intended that hedging will continue to be used to manage price risk in future.

On 1 June 2023, a 2-month foreign currency option was purchased relating to the foreign exchange exposure from the 
US$24 million Loan Note. Upon expiry in July 2023 a further option was purchased to hedge the facility amount past financial 
close of the Trafigura facilities. 

5.4 CORPORATE COSTS

The corporate costs for the year were $14.8 million (FY22: $14.6 million). Corporate costs include head office employee related 
costs, Group professional services costs and other operating costs. 

5.5 DIVIDENDS

The Board of Directors did not declare a final dividend for the year ended 30 June 2023 (30 June 2022: Nil). 

97 
—

AURELIA METALSOPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

6. SAFETY, RISK AND SUSTAINABILITY 
—

Building and maintaining a trusted, sustainable, and beneficial presence in the areas in which we operate is essential. 
Our approach to sustainability is aligned with our vision and our values of care, curiosity, nimble and one team. 

We are embedding sustainability within our business and building resilience founded upon ethical and transparent business 
and governance practices. We recognise the need to continuously improve, understand, benchmark and address emerging 
issues which are of importance to ourselves and our stakeholders.

Our core activities continue to be directed towards providing certainty of no fatalities and no major environmental or community 
incidents (incidents having a detrimental impact on the environment that would impact Aurelia’s reputation and license 
to operate). 

The foundational governance structures and programs which support Aurelia’s safety, risk and sustainability approach and 
strategy include:

Rules to Live By – A defined set of rules by which all people working at Aurelia sites are required to comply. The rules are 
based on industry research where breaches of such rules may result in fatalities. Mandatory training on the Rules to Live By 
is completed for all personnel.

Green Rules – A defined set of rules that apply to work and activities that have a greater risk of causing environmental 
harm or impacting Aurelia’s reputation.

Fatal and Catastrophic Hazard Standards – A set of Group standards that have been developed which define 
the requirements for appropriately engineered work environments, fit for purpose equipment, and a trained workforce. 
These standards also address catastrophic environmental hazards.

Critical Control Verification – A periodic and planned program of critical control verifications including improvement 
action identification, tracking and closeout.

Group Risk Register – A register of group risks which are assessed for likelihood and consequence in line with Aurelia’s 
Enterprise Risk Management Framework which is aligned with the International Standard for managing risk ISO31000:2018.

High Potential Risk Incidents (HPRI’s) – A Senior Management Taskforce for Significant Incidents assesses HPRI 
investigations and verifies action close-out to prevent recurrence.

Safety Leadership Programs – A multifaceted preemptive program focusing on visible leadership and the proactive 
verification of safety and environmental compliance to defined standards. The program includes a defined activity matrix 
which includes Safe Act Observations (SAO), Workplace Inspections, and Planned Task Observations (PTO).

Competency Framework – A competency matrix developed to map employee training and development plans and 
to identify and address any gaps in expected competencies.

Close out of Actions – A groupwide approach for the tracking and reporting of actions, and the close out of actions 
to an appropriate standard.

The above control frameworks are also supported by external audits and verification processes to ensure that Aurelia are attuned 
to evolving risks and opportunities. 

98 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

6. SAFETY, RISK AND SUSTAINABILITY (CONTINUED) 
—

Our safety and environmental incident reduction journey over the last two years is evidence that good governance, systems 
and a sustained focus on safety and environment outcomes combine to support reduced incident frequency rates. 

Group 12-month average Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) per million hours worked:

e
t
a
R
y
c
n
e
u
q
e
r
F
y
r
u

j

n
I

e

l

b
a
d
r
o
c
e
R

l

a
t
o
T

)
d
e
k
r
o
w
s
r
u
o
h
n
o

i
l
l
i

m

r
e
p
(

12

10

8

6

4
Jul-22 Aug-22 Sep-22 Oct-22 Nov-22 Dec-22 Jan-23 Feb-23 Mar-23 Apr-23 May-23 Jun-23

Since the implementation of the Green Rules, the frequency of reportable environmental incidents has improved. Aurelia’s 
environmental compliance performance is measured by the Recordable Environmental Incident Frequency Rate (REIFR) per 
million hours worked. For the first half of the financial year the Company experienced reportable injuries, however, the frequency 
rate has progressively improved through the second half of the financial year through reinforced governance.

In August 2023 the Company was recognised for its REIFR reporting by being awarded the Environmental Excellence award 
at the NSW Minerals Council HSEC Awards.

7. MATERIAL BUSINESS RISKS 
—

Aurelia prepares its business plan using estimates of production and financial performance based on a range of assumptions 
and forecasts. There is uncertainty in these assumptions and forecasts, and risk that variation from them could result in actual 
performance being different to expected outcomes. The uncertainties arise from a range of factors, including the nature of the 
mining industry, and general economic factors. The material business risks faced by the Group that may have an impact on the 
operating and financial prospects of the Group at the period end are outlined below.

7.1 FLUCTUATIONS IN THE COMMODITY PRICE AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES

The Group’s revenues are exposed to fluctuations in the US$ price of gold, silver, lead, zinc and copper. Volatility in metal prices 
creates revenue uncertainty and requires careful management of business performance to ensure that operating cash margins 
are maintained despite metal price volatility. Gold doré sales are denominated in Australian dollars, whilst concentrate sales are 
denominated in US dollars. The Company has a foreign exchange price risk when the US dollar price of a commodity is translated 
back to Australian dollars. 

During the financial year, gold and gold in concentrate unhedged sales were 29,812 ounces (FY22: 9,249 ounces). The effect 
on the income statement with an A$50/oz increase/decrease in gold price would have resulted in an increase/decrease in 
profit/loss and equity of $2.2 million (FY22: $0.5 million).

During the financial year the Company made unhedged sales of concentrate containing payable lead of 6,276 tonnes 
(FY22: 4,831 tonnes), payable zinc 3,618 tonnes (FY22: 12,394 tonnes) and payable copper of 285 tonnes (FY22: 1,176 tonnes). 
An increase/decrease of US$50/t in the price of lead, zinc and copper would have resulted in an increase/decrease profit/loss 
and equity by $0.8 million (FY22: $1.3 million). 

A movement in the US/AUD foreign exchange rate by 1% would result in an increase/decrease in revenue of $0.5 million.

99 
—

AURELIA METALS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

7. MATERIAL BUSINESS RISKS (CONTINUED) 
—

7.1 FLUCTUATIONS IN THE COMMODITY PRICE AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES (CONTINUED)

Declining metal prices can also impact operations by requiring a reassessment of the feasibility of an exploration target and/or 
evaluation project. Even if a project is ultimately determined to be economically viable, the need to conduct such a reassessment 
could cause substantial delays and/or may interrupt operations, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of 
operations and financial position.

7.2 MINERAL RESOURCES AND ORE RESERVES

Group Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves are estimates, and no assurance can be given that the estimated reserves and 
resources are accurate or that the indicated level of metal or other mineral will be produced. Such estimates are based on 
interpretations of geological data obtained from drill holes and other sampling techniques. Actual mineralisation or geological 
conditions may be different from those predicted. No assurance can be given that any part of the Company’s mineral resources 
constitutes or will be converted into reserves.

Market price fluctuations, as well as increased production and capital costs, may render some of the Company’s ore reserves 
unprofitable to develop for periods of time or may render some low margin ore reserves uneconomic. Mineral Resources and Ore 
Reserves may have to be re-estimated based on new data, production performance, cost experience and metal price outlook. 
Any of these factors may require the Company to modify its ore reserves, which could have either a positive or negative impact 
on the Company’s financial results.

7.3 REPLACEMENT OF DEPLETED RESERVES

The Company must continually replace reserves depleted by production to maintain production levels over the long-term. 
Reserves can be replaced by expanding known ore bodies, locating new deposits, acquiring new assets or achieving higher 
levels of conversion from resource to reserve with improvements in production costs and/or operational performance and metal 
price outlook. 

Exploration is highly speculative in nature and as such, the Company’s exploration projects involve many risks and can often be 
unsuccessful. Once a prospect with mineralisation is discovered, it may take several years from the initial discovery phase until 
production is possible.

As a result, there is no assurance that current or future exploration programs will be successful. There is a risk that depletion 
of reserves will not be offset by discoveries or acquisitions, or that divestment of assets will lead to a lower reserve base. 
The Company’s mineral base may decline if reserves are mined without adequate replacement and the Company may not be 
able to sustain production beyond the current mine life, based on current production rates.

7.4 PRODUCTION AND COST ESTIMATES

The Company routinely prepares internal estimates of future production, operating costs and capital costs for its operating 
assets and development projects. The Company has developed business plans which forecast metal recoveries, ore volumes 
and operating costs for each business unit. While these assumptions are considered reasonable, there can be no guarantee that 
forecast rates will be achieved. Failure to achieve production or cost estimates could have an adverse impact on the Company’s 
operating margins, future cash flow, profitability and financial solvency.

100 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

7. MATERIAL BUSINESS RISKS (CONTINUED) 
—

7.4 PRODUCTION AND COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)

The Company’s actual production and costs may vary from estimates for a variety of reasons, including:

 Š actual ore mined varying from estimates of grade, tonnage, dilution and metallurgical and other characteristics

 Š short-term operating factors relating to the ore reserves, such as the need for sequential development of ore bodies and the 

processing of new or different ore grades

 Š revisions to mine plans

 Š risks and hazards associated with mining

 Š natural phenomena, such as inclement weather conditions, water availability, floods, and

 Š unexpected labour shortages or strikes.

Costs of production may also be affected by a variety of factors, including ore grade, geotechnical conditions, metallurgical 
performance, labour costs, consumable costs, energy costs, commodity costs, general inflationary pressures and currency 
exchange rates. 

7.5 MINING RISKS AND INSURANCE RISKS

The mining industry is subject to significant risks and hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual 
or unexpected geological conditions, unavailability of materials and equipment, rock failures, cave-ins, and weather conditions 
(including flooding and bushfires) – most of which are beyond the Company’s control.

These risks and hazards could result in significant costs or delays that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s 
financial performance, liquidity and operations results.

The Company maintains insurance to cover some of these risks and hazards. Insurance is maintained in amounts that are 
believed to be reasonable depending on the circumstances surrounding each identified insurable risk and are benchmarked 
against peer insurance programs. However, property, liability and other insurance may not provide sufficient coverage for losses 
related to these or other risks or hazards. 

7.6 ATTRACTION AND RETENTION OF SKILLED AND EXPERIENCED PERSONNEL

The mining industry in general may be subject to a shortage of suitably experienced and qualified personnel in key 
technical roles. Attracting and retaining key persons with specific knowledge and skills are critical to the viability and growth of 
the Company. 

The Company maintains a suitably structured remuneration strategy to assist with the attraction and retention of key employees. 
However, the risk of loss of key employees is always present. This risk is managed through having active and broad recruitment 
channels and the ability to rely upon other suitable personnel and qualified external contractors and consultants when required.

7.7 ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY

Environmental, health and safety regulations, permits

The Company’s mining and processing operations and exploration activities are subject to extensive laws and regulations 
governing the protection of the environment. This includes the regulation and management of water, waste disposal, worker 
health and safety, mine development, mine rehabilitation and closure, air quality and biodiversity.

Real or perceived events associated with the Company’s activities (or those of other mining companies) that detrimentally 
impact the environment, human health and safety, or the surrounding communities may result in penalties, including delays in 
obtaining or failure to obtain government permits and approvals. This may adversely affect the Company’s operations, including 
its ability to continue operations.

101 
—

AURELIA METALSOPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

7. MATERIAL BUSINESS RISKS (CONTINUED) 
—

7.7 ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY (CONTINUED)

The Company has implemented a range of health, safety, environment and community related initiatives at its operations 
to manage and support the health and safety of its employees, contractors and members of the community affected by 
its operations. Despite this, there is no guarantee that such measures will eliminate the occurrence of accidents or other 
incidents which may result in personal injuries, damage to property, and in certain instances such occurrences could give 
rise to regulatory fines and/or civil liability.

Water

Water can be a scarce commodity in regional NSW, Australia. Water is a significant input into processing activities and access to 
sufficient water to support current and future activities is critical. The impact of drought conditions serves to increase this risk. 
The Company has established reliable sources of water which are an alternative to high security water sources. In addition, 
in some other parts of NSW high rainfall related risks (including flooding), could lead to water storages on site overflowing 
and discharging into the environment. High rainfall events may also disrupt access to site and operations on site.

Each of Aurelia’s mining operations prioritise the use of recycled water for its processing activities to preserve water reserves 
and to limit the use of external water sources.

The Peak Mine obtains high security water from the Burrendong Dam to supplement other water sources, including water from 
the historic Great Cobar underground workings.

The Dargues Mine has experienced significant rainfall over the last few years. As a result, water is stored within the tailings 
storage facility which is utilised for activities onsite. If supplementary water is required, Dargues has regulatory approval to truck 
water to site. 

Community relations

The Company has operations near established communities. Active community engagement and a proactive outlook and 
approach to local community stakeholder concerns and expectations is a key priority. 

The mining industry in general is subject to potential community relations related risks which may result in a disruption to 
production and exploration activities and delay the approval timelines for key development activities. The Company recognises 
that by building respectful relationships with the communities in where it operates, it creates a shared value that is mutually 
beneficial. Community relations initiatives such as community forums, community development programs, donations, and 
sponsorships are coordinated to ensure active community engagement.

The Company’s operating philosophy is to ensure that the Company’s activities are carried out legally, ethically, and with 
integrity and respect. Being a significant employer and consumer within the communities in which we operate, the Company 
acknowledges the immeasurable responsibility bestowed on it. The Company’s active community engagement program provides 
a platform for the Company to understand stakeholder needs and to work towards proactively addressing concerns and 
mitigating any risk.

102 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONTINUED)

7. MATERIAL BUSINESS RISKS (CONTINUED) 
—

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS 

Apart from the items as noted elsewhere in this report, there were no significant changes in the state of affairs of the Company 
during the financial year.

SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE DATE 

The matters or events that have occurred after 30 June 2023 that have significantly affected or may significantly either the 
Group’s operations or results of those operations of the Group’s state of affairs are listed below:

 Š A new Director appointed – Mr Lyn Brazil (and his alternate, Mr Bradley Newcombe) was appointed on 17 July 2023.

 Š The retail entitlement offer component of the equity raise completed in July 2023 with ~168 million new shares issued.

 Š The Trafigura debt facilities financial close occurred in August 2023 and the 120 million warrants were issued to Trafigura 

(with an exercise price of A$0.25/share and a four year term).

103 
—

AURELIA METALSLETTER FROM THE CHAIR 
OF THE REMUNERATION 
AND NOMINATION COMMITTEE  
—

Dear Shareholder,

On behalf of the Board of Directors of Aurelia Metals Limited, 
I am pleased to present our FY23 Remuneration Report.

The size and scope of the organisational change agenda set 
out by the Board at the Annual General Meeting could have 
intimidated the most well-seasoned leaders and employees 
alike, but I look back with pride at all that has been achieved. 

The turnaround in operational performance and cash 
management has involved every Aurelia employee who 
embraced the challenge to return operational certainty 
and begin the journey to restore shareholder value. 
Organisation-wide initiatives, such as Working Smarter 
captured $25 million in savings across the business, while 
teams on site adjusted to new mine plans and operational 
targets to increase cash flows. 

FY23 was a year of rebalance. Despite strong commodity 
prices, a combination of complex external factors provided a 
challenging landscape for companies like ours. Against this 
backdrop, we adapted our plans through a significant 
Company refinancing whilst attracting a new Executive team 
being the Managing Director, CFO and recently a Federation 
Project Director. These changes aim to ensure operational 
excellence whilst accelerating towards our premiere 
Federation Project – which we see as a significant value 
catalyst for our Company. 

Along the way, we have been cognisant of the impacts of 
fatigue, uncertainty and distraction that a sustained period 
of transition can have on employees. For this reason, in FY23 
we set in motion a range of programs to ensure positive 
workforce outcomes designed to support and care for 
our people. At the heart of this effort, was our remuneration 
framework – a critical tool required to attract, retain and 
reward employees who go above and beyond. 

Remuneration governance 

At Aurelia, we have developed a robust remuneration 
framework that links outcomes with business performance. 
It is built on strong governance and transparent reporting. 
To ensure our approach is in line with current trends, market 
expectations and peer insights, each year we engage with our 
stakeholders (including proxy advisors) to hear their views 
on our strategic approach to sustainability and employee-
related matters, including our remuneration framework. 

The low vesting outcomes for the Company’s FY21 long-term 
incentives reflected the Company’s poor shareholder return 
over the three year period (to 30 June 2023). The absolute 
and relative total shareholder return measures, and growth 
measures all vested at 0%, reflecting the alignment 
of ‘at risk’ remuneration for relevant employees with 
shareholder expectations. 

As Aurelia continues to grow, the Board recognises 
that the overarching remuneration framework and 
related governance controls need to be reviewed on an 
ongoing basis. This includes the Company’s incentive plans 
for ‘at-risk’ remuneration, which are reviewed to ensure the 
plans remain relevant and meet the underlying objective 
of creating alignment with Aurelia’s short- and long-term 
business objectives. 

Remuneration changes in FY23 

Aurelia takes a whole of business approach to developing 
strategy and plans, reviewing performance and linking 
outcomes to variable remuneration. 

In FY23, our Short-Term Incentive (STI) Plan was 
simplified, moving to three pillars: safety, production, and 
cost outcomes. These three measures were chosen as we 
believe that by achieving our goals under these pillars, 
it unlocks the key to our business success. Simplifying the 
measures allows the Company to clearly align executive 
and employee variable remuneration (short-term 
and long-term incentives) to Company performance 
and key stakeholder expectations. The simplification 
allowed employees and stakeholders to make a clear 
link between Company performance and the payment of 
variable remuneration.

As shareholders would be aware, substantial pressure 
on wages is being experienced across all sectors of the 
economy, flowing from high levels of inflations and record 
low unemployment. The Board is acutely aware of the need to 
balance cost control against the disruption to operations that 
are caused by a reduction in the workforce. The Remuneration 
and Nomination Committee are aware that the Company is 
experiencing high turnover due to competitive salaries within 
the industry. The Committee recognises the needs to remain 
competitive to continue to attract high calibre talent. 

The Company’s remuneration framework is founded 
on governance aligned with stakeholder expectations. 
While there have been no material changes to remuneration 

104 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF THE REMUNERATION AND NOMINATION COMMITTEE (CONTINUED)

in FY23, the Company has continued to refine and embed 
governance processes and strategies which support its 
remuneration objectives. Some of the activities completed 
to this end in FY23 include:

 Š Increases to the KMP’s Total Fixed Remuneration (TFR) is 
equal to the average increases awarded across the entire 
Aurelia workforce.

 Š Commitment to meeting the 0.5% increase in legislated 

Superannuation Guarantee (SG) effective from 1 July 2023 
on top of the annual salary review increases which will also 
be effective from 1 July 2023.

 Š No change to the Non-Executive Director fee structure was 

implemented during FY23.

 Š Changes to the Short-Term Incentive Plan to simplify the 
Company KPIs and provide a clear link between business 
performance and payment of variable remuneration. 

 Š Invitation to Senior Professionals and Superintendents 
to participate in the FY23 LTI Scheme for the first time. 
This encourages ownership of the long-term Company 
performance at all leadership levels of the Company. 
Employees at the Manager level and above continue to be 
eligible to participate in the LTI Scheme. 

Diversity and Inclusion 

With mining operations at the Hera Mine ceasing and the 
surface facilities transitioned into care and maintenance, 
and recruitment ramping up for Federation development in 
June, ensuring our approach to remuneration safeguards our 
commitment to diversity and inclusion has been a keen focus. 
In FY23, this included:

 Š Conducting and extensive gender pay gap analysis, before 
and after any award of salary increases. This is provided 
to the Remuneration and Nomination Committee and the 
Board for review and approval. 

 Š Continuing well established remuneration bands 

and position grading to ensure there is no room for 
unconscious bias when appointing candidates, that is, 
the remuneration for candidates is not dependent 
on their individual powers of negotiation.

 Š Increasing female representation across the workforce 
for the fourth year in a row, female participation in the 
workforce at 30 June 2023 is 22.65% (FY22: 21.5%).

 Š Board commitment to ensuring 25% of its members 
are women (as a minimum). At 30 June 2023, female 
representation of the Board sat at 29% and currently 
female representation is at 25% (given the appointment 
of an additional Non-Executive Director). 

 Š Implementing a detailed three-year Diversity & Inclusion 
Strategy (FY22-FY25) and a dedicated Diversity Working 
Group in charge of actioning key targets against this 
strategy and promoting D&I throughout the Company. 
Such as:

 – Delivering an extensive face-to-face Workplace 

Behaviour Training that educated employees on the 
Company’s expected behaviours when it comes to 
Bullying, Harassment (including Sexual Harassment), 
Discrimination and Victimisation. 

 – Introduced a Flexible Working Standard and the Group 
Parental Leave Standard. These standards provide 
greater clarity around the support mechanisms for 
carers. These standards emphasise flexibility and are 
aimed at supporting parents to return to our workforce 
whilst balancing additional responsibilities at home. 

 – Continuing to collect information from our workforce 

relating to gender equality through targeted questions 
in Exit Interviews, surveys on psychological hazards and 
sustainability surveys.

Looking ahead 

The next two years will be transformational for Aurelia. 
Funding for Federation, new leadership and a re-energised 
focus on our mines have set the foundation for our 
future success. 

Given the KMP have been newly appointed in FY23, we do 
not anticipate there to be any substantial changes to the 
Total Fixed Remuneration (TFR) or changes to variable 
remuneration such as short-term and/or long-term 
incentive opportunities. 

The Remuneration and Nomination Committee will continue 
to monitor and review remuneration for the executive team 
and all employees consistent with the annual review cycle. 

We are confident our remuneration strategy will enable us 
to attract and retain the high calibre team we need to take 
us forward while strongly aligning employee interest with 
shareholder value. 

Thank you for your continued interest and support of 
our Company. 

Paul Harris 
Chair – Remuneration and Nomination Committee 

105 
—

AURELIA METALS 
This Remuneration Report forms part of the Directors’ Report for the year ended 30 June 2023. This report outlines the 
details of the remuneration arrangements for the Directors and Key Management Personnel (KMP). It also outlines the 
overall remuneration strategy, framework and practices adopted by the Company in accordance with the requirements of the 
Corporations Act 2001 and its Regulations. 

For the purposes of this report, KMP are defined as those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and 
controlling the activities of the Company and the Group, directly or indirectly, including any Director of the Company (whether 
executive or otherwise). 

106 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023REMUNERATION 
REPORT 
CONTENTS 
—

Key Management Personnel (KMP)

Remuneration Governance

Remuneration Overview

Managing Director and CEO 
and other KMP Remuneration

Service Agreement Key Terms

How Performance is linked to the  
Variable 'At-Risk' Remuneration for  
the Managing Director and CEO and  
other Executive KMP

Malus Policy

Non-Executive Director remuneration

Remuneration of Directors and other KMP

Shareholdings of Directors and other KMP

Company Performance 
and Remuneration Outcomes

Other Matters

108

109

110

111

113

114

125

125

126

128

130

130

107 
—

AURELIA METALSREMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) 
—

1. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL (KMP) 
—

The KMP of the Company, and the positions held are summarised below:

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

POSITION

TERM

Peter Botten 

Susie Corlett 

Independent Non-Executive Chair 

Full Year 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Full Year 

Lawrence Conway 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Resigned 31 August 2022 

Bruce Cox 

Paul Harris 

Helen Gillies 

Bob Vassie 

Lyn Brazil (i)

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Appointed 1 September 2022 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Full Year 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Full Year 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Full Year 

Non-Executive Director 

Appointed 17 July 2023

Bradley Newcombe (ii)

Alternate Director for Lyn Brazil

From 17 July 2023

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

Daniel Clifford 

Bryan Quinn 

OTHER KMP 

Peter Trout (iii) 

Managing Director and CEO 

Resigned 18 November 2022 

Managing Director and CEO 

Appointed 6 June 2023 

Chief Operating Officer 

Full Year

Martin Cummings

Chief Financial Officer

Appointed 1 December 2022

Ian Poole 

INTERIM CEO 

Andrew Graham

Chief Financial Officer and Company 
Secretary

Retired 31 December 2022

Interim CEO

Interim appointment 19 November 2022 - 
5 June 2023

(i)  Mr Franklyn Brazil was appointed as a Non-Executive Director on 17 July 2023. Mr Brazil is appointed as a nominee of Brazil Farming Pty Ltd.

(ii)  Mr Bradley Newcombe is Mr Brazil’s alternate director on the Board. 

(iii)  Peter Trout ceased employment with the Company on 7 August 2023. 

108 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

2. REMUNERATION GOVERNANCE  
—

BOARD

 Š As part of its Corporate Governance framework, the Board of Directors (the Board) has an established Remuneration and 
Nomination Committee (referred to hereafter as the ‘Remuneration Committee’ for the purposes of this Remuneration 
Report)

 Š The Board delegates responsibilities in relation to remuneration to the Remuneration Committee which functions in 
accordance with the Committee Charter and the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and its regulations

 Š A copy of the Charter is published on Aurelia's website (https://aureliametals.com/about/corporate-governance/)

REMUNERATION COMMITTEE

 Š The Remuneration Committee consists solely of independent Non-Executive Directors to assist the Board in discharging 

its responsibilities in relation to the Company's remuneration policies and practices

 Š The Remuneration Committee is chaired by an independent Non-Executive Director who is not the Chair of the Board

 Š Membership is detailed on page 79, under Section 3 of the Director’s Report

 Š The Remuneration Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board in relation to 

remuneration matters, including the:

 – remuneration arrangements and contract terms for the Managing Director and CEO and other KMP

 – terms and conditions of short-term and long-term incentives for all employees, particularly the Managing Director and 

CEO and other KMP, including the targets, performance measures and vesting conditions

 – remuneration paid to Non-Executive Directors, and 

 – the budget for any annual salary increases for the Group.

REMUNERATION CONSULTANTS

 Š The Remuneration Committee considers whether to appoint a remuneration consultant and, if so, their scope of work. Such 

engagements are completed in accordance with:

 – the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 for remuneration consultants and related recommendations, and

 – established governance procedures including direct reporting to the Board to ensure that any remuneration 

recommendation is free from undue influence.

 Š During FY23, the Remuneration Committee engaged independent consulting firm Juno Partners for the purpose of 

providing advice and analysis with respect to remuneration (FY22: Juno Partners)

 Š No remuneration recommendations, as defined in section 9B of the Corporations Act 2001, were made by the remuneration 

consultants during FY23 (FY22: Nil)

109 
—

AURELIA METALSREMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

3. REMUNERATION OVERVIEW  
—

AURELIA’S REMUNERATION PHILOSOPHY 

 Š Aurelia’s remuneration philosophy is supported by a framework for organisational structure and remuneration, to enable 

Aurelia to:

 – attract, engage and retain high-calibre employees to achieve the Company’s current and future business needs, and 

 – encourage a performance-based culture whereby competitive remuneration and rewards are aligned to business and 

shareholder objectives

AURELIA’S APPROACH TO REMUNERATION

 Š The Company’s approach to remuneration considers: 

 – detailed remuneration benchmarking, with reference to the Company’s peers (industry and market capitalisation)

 – the Company’s performance over the relevant performance period

 – internal relativity and differentiation of remuneration based on performance

 – pay equity at each level to ensure no gender or diversity bias within the organisation, and any differences are 

determined based on performance and skills

 – market developments affecting remuneration practices

 – the remuneration and expectations of a high performing executive the Company wants to employ

 – addressing emerging needs or concerns with tailored remuneration solutions (eg. retention schemes) 

 – the link between remuneration and the successful implementation of the Company’s strategy, and achievements 

of objectives and targets, and

 – future outlook.

THE LINK TO STRATEGIC BUSINESS OUTCOMES

 Š The Company's remuneration framework is founded upon aligning each individual’s remuneration outcomes with the 

Company's strategic business objectives. This alignment is created through linking 'at-risk' remuneration with Aurelia’s 
strategic business objectives:

 – 'at-risk' STIs are linked to individual and Company annual objectives and individual performance outcomes

 – 'at-risk' LTIs are linked to the achievement of long-term strategic objectives in Section 6.2, and

 – the typical key performance measures applied have been detailed in Sections 6.1 and 6.2.

 Š Aurelia’s objective is to build a performance-based culture whereby competitive remuneration and rewards are aligned 
with the Company’s objectives and shareholders' expectations. A significant proportion of total remuneration is ‘at-risk' 

 Š Through this framework, Aurelia seeks to attract, engage and retain high-calibre employees to meet the Company’s 

current and future business needs

110 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

4. MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CEO AND OTHER KMP REMUNERATION  
—

Total Remuneration (TR) for all executive KMP consists of the following key elements:

TOTAL FIXED 
REMUNERATION 
(TFR)

Remuneration objective is to attract, engage and retain 
high-calibre personnel. 

Considerations include benchmarking data, internal 
relativities and executive performance.

The purpose of TFR is to provide 
a base level of remuneration 
which is market competitive 
and appropriate.

SHORT-TERM 
INCENTIVE (STI)

The STI is an ‘at-risk’ component of TR with a 
one-year horizon. 

The performance measures consider the individual’s 
performance based on the individual performance KPI’s 
as well as Group performance under the pillars of Safety, 
Production and Financial Outcomes. 

The key focus of the performance measures is to build and 
deliver superior shareholder returns.

LONG-TERM 
INCENTIVE (LTI)

The LTI is an ‘at-risk’ component of TR with a 
three-year horizon. 

The performance measures are designed to support 
superior shareholder return. 

The objective of the LTI is to:

1. 

provide an incentive to the executive KMP which 
focuses on the long-term performance and growth 
of the Company

2. 

align the reward of the executive KMP with returns 
to shareholders; and

3.  promote the retention of the Company's executive 

KMP and eligible employees.

The key performance measures 
are set at the beginning of 
each year with a one-year 
performance period.

A number of critical tasks and 
measures linked to each of 
the Company's key pillars are 
identified (refer to section 6.1 
of this report).

The relative weighting is 
determined based on the role 
being performed and level 
within the Company and is 
applied as a percentage of the 
employee’s TFR.

The performance measures 
are set at the beginning of 
each year, with a three-year 
performance period as is 
applied as a percentage of the 
employee’s TFR.

The key focus of the performance 
measures is to build and deliver 
superior shareholder return 
through total shareholder return 
(TSR) measures and targeted 
long-term growth criteria (refer 
to section 6.2 of this report).

In addition to the above, eligible employees of the Company (including certain executive KMP) are entitled to participate in the  
Company’s Employee Share Plan. This plan was implemented in April 2021. Eligible employees are invited to participate in the 
plan to receive fully paid ordinary shares in the Company (subject to a 36-month holding lock) with a nominal value of $1,000 
which, depending on the individual’s taxable income in the relevant year, may be tax exempt. The Managing Director and CEO 
did not participate in this plan in FY23 due to commencing employment after the grant date. 

111 
—

AURELIA METALS 
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

4. MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CEO AND OTHER KMP REMUNERATION 
(CONTINUED) 
—

The amount and relative proportion of TFR, STI and LTI is established for each executive following consideration by the 
Remuneration Committee. This includes consideration of external market references, including benchmarking of remuneration 
for comparable roles and the internal relativities between executive roles. The Company also regularly participates in and 
subscribes to the AON Hewitt Gold & General Mining Industry Remuneration Survey. 

The principles underlying the Company's executive remuneration strategy are below: 

a) Total Remuneration (TR) is to be appropriate, market competitive and structured to attract and retain talented and 

experienced employees. 

b) TR is to comprise an appropriate mix of fixed and performance-based at-risk variable remuneration. 

c) TFR (base salary + superannuation) is targeted at the median (P50) range compared to the industry benchmark and 

internal relativities. Exceptions may exist depending on the supply and demand of particular roles or skills or for individuals 
who are recognised as high performers within the Company and thereby will be highly sought after by competitor companies. 

d) variable remuneration is to consist of STIs and LTIs to align executive performance with the interests of shareholders. 
Performance targets under the variable incentive plans reflect the Company’s short-term and long-term strategy 
and objectives. 

e) in keeping with the Company policy of paying for performance, target TR (TFR + target STI + target LTI) is targeted at up 

to the 75th percentile of the relevant peer group (exceptions may exist depending on the supply and demand of particular 
roles or skills or for individuals who are recognised as high performers within the Company). As variable remuneration is 
performance based it is not guaranteed, with any award dependent on the business and individual meeting pre-determined 
performance targets. 

f)  performance-based ‘at-risk’ remuneration is to encourage, and reward high performance aligned with business objectives that 

create strategic, economic and sustainable shareholder value. 

g) an annual review of remuneration is conducted for all supervisory roles and above (including the KMP) based on an appraisal 

against their individual achievement and development plan and is designed is to deliver fair and equitable results. 

Total Remuneration at maximum (Total Fixed Remuneration, Short-Term incentives at maximum and LTI opportunity) would see 
the mix of remuneration for KMP as detailed below: 

FY23

Bryan Quinn, Managing Director and CEO

Peter Trout, Chief Operating Officer

TFR 

$827,500

$532,911

Martin Cummings, Chief Financial Officer

$442,000

Andrew Graham, Interim CEO*

$585,000

% OF TOTAL REMUNERATION AT MAXIMUM

TFR - 31%

TFR - 39%

TFR - 39%

TFR - 36%

STI - 38%

LTI - 31%

STI - 31%

LTI - 29%

STI - 31%

LTI - 29%

STI - 36%

LTI - 27%

Daniel Clifford, Previous Managing Director 
and CEO

$756,428

TFR - 36%

STI - 27%

LTI - 36%

Ian Poole, Previous Chief Financial Officer

$442,000

TFR - 44%

STI - 27%

LTI - 29%

FY22

TFR 

% OF TOTAL REMUNERATION AT MAXIMUM

Daniel Clifford, Managing Director and CEO

$753,005

TFR - 38%

STI - 24%

LTI - 38%

Peter Trout, Chief Operating Officer

Ian Poole, Chief Financial Officer

$530,500

$440,000

TFR - 49%

TFR - 49%

STI - 19% LTI - 32%

STI - 19% LTI - 32%

*Total Remuneration for Andrew Graham is for the period between 19 November 2022 and 5 June 2023 as Interim CEO. Mr. Graham was also entitled to a 
completion bonus of $125,000 paid on completion of his tenure as Interim CEO as reflected in Section 9 Remuneration of Directors and other KMP.

112 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

5. SERVICE AGREEMENT KEY TERMS 
—

Executives are employed under executive employment agreements with the Company

NAME AND 
POSITION

DATE OF 
SERVICE 
AGREEMENT

TERM OF 
SERVICE 
AGREEMENT

Current Executive Directors and KMP

NOTICE PERIOD 
BY EXECUTIVE

NOTICE PERIOD 
BY AURELIA

TERMINATION 
PAYMENTS

Bryan Quinn 
Managing Director & CEO

31 May 23

Open

6 months*

6 months

Martin Cummings 
Chief Financial Officer

02 Nov 22

Open

3 months

On or before 
30 June 2024: 
7 months

After 30 June 
2024: 3 months + 
1 month per year 
of service up to 
a maximum of 6 
months

Previous Executive Directors and KMP

Peter Trout 
Chief Operating Officer

25 Nov 19

Open

6 months

6 months

Andrew Graham 
Interim Chief Executive 
Officer***

18 Nov 22

Until the 
appointment of a 
permanent CEO, 
or as otherwise 
terminated by the 
Board

6 months

6 months

Daniel Clifford 
Managing Director & CEO

25 Nov 19

Open

6 months

6 months

Ian Poole 
Chief Financial Officer

12 May 20

Open

3 months

3 months + 1 month 
per year of service 
up to a maximum 
of an additional 
3 months 

Up to a max of 
6 months fixed 
remuneration (TFR)

Up to a max of 
7 months TFR

Up to a max of 
12 months base 
salary**

Up to a max of 
6 months fixed 
remuneration (TFR)

Up to a max of 
6 months fixed 
remuneration (TFR)

Up to a max of 
3 months fixed 
remuneration (TFR)

*If there is a Fundamental Change, the Managing Director & CEO may terminate the employment by giving one months’ notice 
in which case Aurelia shall pay twelve months of total fixed remuneration. A ‘Fundamental Change’ includes ceasing to hold the 
position of Managing Director and CEO or report to the Board or where the scope of the responsibilities or authority is materially 
diminished (other than on a temporary basis). 

**The Service Agreement related to the Chief Operating Officer was negotiated to secure his services and is limited to those 
that can be lawfully paid under the Corporations Act 2001. The Company has subsequently limited termination payments for 
future executive KMP service agreements to a maximum of six months.

*** Mr Graham’s appointment as Interim CEO was under the terms of his existing employment agreement (as amended).

113 
—

AURELIA METALSREMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

6. HOW PERFORMANCE IS LINKED TO THE VARIABLE 
‘AT-RISK’ REMUNERATION FOR THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 
AND CEO AND OTHER KMP 
—

The objective of variable remuneration is to align KMP remuneration outcomes to the short-term and long-term incentives 
strategy and objectives of the Company. This alignment is achieved through the Company’s variable ‘at-risk’ incentives, which 
comprise the Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) and the Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP).

The Board measures and considers the achievement of targets together with overall business performance and individual 
performance (as relevant) when deciding on the actual payment or allocation of variable remuneration. The Board retains 
absolute discretion in relation to participation and award under the STIP and LTIP.

6.1 SHORT TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (STIP) 

The award of an STI payment is assessed at the end of the financial year and, if applicable, is paid only after the Remuneration 
Committee has reviewed and made recommendations to the Board for approval. This includes the assessment of achievement 
against applicable businesses performance and individual performance targets. Key elements of the Company’s FY23 z 
Incentive Plan are:

Purpose

Focus participants on delivery of business objectives over a 12-month period .

Participation

All employees including executive KMP.

STI opportunity

The STI opportunity for the Interim CEO was targeted at 50% of TFR for the period of appointment with 
an award for outperformance against a “stretch target” of 200% of this amount, i.e., a potential maximum 
award of 100% of TFR.

The STI opportunity for the other KMP is at 40% of the TFR at target with an award for outperformance 
against “stretch target” of 200% of this amount, i.e. a potential maximum award of 80% of TFR. 

Period

Performance 
criteria

The Managing Director and CEO does not have an STI opportunity for FY23 as he commenced 
in June 2023. His STI opportunity for FY24 will be 100% of the TFR at target with an award for 
outperformance against “stretch target” of 125% of this amount.

The previous Managing Director and CEO is entitled to a pro rata STI award for FY23 (up to his 
resignation date), to be assessed against the FY23 performance criteria.

Performance is measured per financial year (1 July to 30 June).

The performance criteria and weighting of individual components are reviewed and determined annually 
at the discretion of the Board. 

The weighting given to each metric may differ by role. For FY23, the weighting for KMP was 
80% Company Performance/20% Individual Performance, with each metric then evenly weighted within 
these categories with the exception of the Interim CEO and the CFO who were weighted 50% Company 
Performance/50% Individual Performance in recognition of the role each played in refinancing and 
resetting the Group’s operations.

114 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

6. HOW PERFORMANCE IS LINKED TO THE VARIABLE 
‘AT-RISK’ REMUNERATION FOR THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 
AND CEO AND OTHER KMP (CONTINUED) 
—

6.1 SHORT TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (STIP) (CONTINUED)

Performance 
gates

There were two performance gates for the FY23 STIP. A performance gate is an indicator of 
unsatisfactory business, work or personal performance that voids the STIP award for a specific KPI and/
or Participant. 

Performance Gate

Impact

Safety: Zero fatalities within the Group

Forfeit of the Safety KPI

Individual Behaviour: any formal disciplinary 
action or material breach of the Company Values. 

Forfeit any STI award against Individual KPIs

Exercise of 
discretion

Payment

Rights on 
termination

Malus Policy

The Board has discretion, considering recommendations from the Remuneration Committee, to adjust 
overall STI payments or an individual’s final STI payment. 

STI payments are paid in cash and are subject to a service condition. 

This condition is met if the KMP’s employment is continuous during performance period and was 
employed at the STI payment date. 

The KMP’s entitlement will be calculated on a pro-rata basis if they joined during the performance 
period, with a minimum tenure of four months prior to the end of the performance period (otherwise 
there will be no entitlement).

KMP whose employment is terminated before the date of payment (for whatever reason) are not eligible 
for any STI payment but may be entitled to a pro-rata award as a good leaver.

At its discretion, the Board may cancel or withhold payment of any award made under the STIP for 
the period if it determines that had the STI payment been made the KMP would have received an 
‘inappropriate benefit.’ 

6.1.1 FY23 STIP outcomes for eligible KMP

The Board determined that the following measures would be applicable to participants in the FY23 STIP with variations for the 
individual KPIs as these are dependent on the individual’s role. The same Business Performance categories were applied to all 
STI participants, with metrics differing between Corporate and Site employees, to ensure that all employees were aligned to the 
Company’s strategy, objectives and performance targets whilst being assessed against metrics that were within their control 
and influence.

The STI performance measurements include (where appropriate) the application of threshold, target and stretch elements. 
This complements the Company’s philosophy of performance-based remuneration, where a sliding scale for achievement may be 
awarded based on the actual outcome.

115 
—

AURELIA METALSREMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

6. HOW PERFORMANCE IS LINKED TO THE VARIABLE 
‘AT-RISK’ REMUNERATION FOR THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 
AND CEO AND OTHER KMP (CONTINUED) 
—

6.1 SHORT TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (STIP) (CONTINUED)

6.1.1 FY23 STIP outcomes for eligible KMP (Continued)

These elements are defined below:

THRESHOLD 

TARGET

STRETCH 

Nil award for outcome below 30% of Target

100%

Award for outperformance against Target

Pro-rata between Target and Threshold

Pro-rata up to maximum of 200%

'Target’ is based on challenging but achievable targets for both the Company and the individual components. The stretch target 
reflects outstanding individual and business performance. The threshold target represents the minimal level of acceptable 
performance, recognising that target is set at a challenging level. At threshold, a partial award is made if the Company and/or 
the individual has still performed well, and the Company has successfully progressed.

The Board considered the Individual Performance for each eligible KMP based on the below KPIs. 

 INTERIM CEO – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE KPIs 

KPI 1 

KPI 2 

KPI 3 

Development of Federation

Develop and Deliver Funding

Revise Business Strategy & Develop Growth Options

CFO – INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE KPIs 

KPI 1 

KPI 2 

KPI 3 

Refinance the Business

Develop a Capital Management Plan

Drive Business Improvement

 The Board Considered the Business Performance for employees based on the below KPIs: 

KPI 1 – SAFETY (GROUP 
TRIFR 12MMA) 

KPI 2 – PRODUCTION 
(GOLD EQUIVALENT 
OUNCES) 

KPI 3 – AISC (A$/OUNCE) 

Threshold (0.3) 

Target (1.0) 

Stretch (2.0) 

≤ 8.75 

≤ 6.60 

≤ 4.50 

146,000 

175,200 

192,720 

2,300 

1,748 

1,573 

The FY23 STIP outcomes as applicable eligible KMP is detailed below. 

116 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

6. HOW PERFORMANCE IS LINKED TO THE VARIABLE 
‘AT-RISK’ REMUNERATION FOR THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 
AND CEO AND OTHER KMP (CONTINUED) 
—

6.1 SHORT TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (STIP) (CONTINUED)

6.1.1 FY23 STIP outcomes for eligible KMP(Continued)

KPI 1 

KPI 2 

KPI 3 

KPI 4 – 
SAFETY 

KPI 5 –  
PRODUCTION 

KPI 6 – 
FINANCIAL 

WEIGHTED 
SCORE 

Description 

Individual 
KPI 1 

Individual 
KPI 2 

Individual 
KPI 3 

Group 
TRIFR 
12MMA 

Gold Equivalent 
Ounces 

AISC 
(A$/ounce) 

Not disclosed due to commercial in-confidence

≤ 6.60 

175,200 

≤ 8.75 

146,000 

Threshold 

Target 

Stretch 

Outcomes 

2,300 

1,748 

1,573 

Below 
Threshold 

Below 
Threshold 

129% 

129% 

Below 
Threshold 

62% 

≤ 4.50 

192,720 

Between 
Target & 
Stretch 

Between 
Target & 
Stretch 

Between 
Target & 
Stretch 

Between 
Threshold & 
Target 

Between 
Threshold & 
Target 

Between 
Threshold & 
Target 

Interim CEO 

Between Target & Stretch 

CFO 

Between Target & Stretch 

Previous MD 
& CEO 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

Upon the completion of the assessment related to the above quantitative and qualitative hurdles, the Board has determined and 
approved the award of a FY23 STI for the Company’s KMP, as outlined below:

FY23 

Interim CEO

Andrew Graham (i)

Other KMP

Martin Cummings (ii)

Daniel Clifford (iii)

TOTAL STIP AWARDED  
$

% OF MAXIMUM 
(STRETCH) STIP AWARDED

% OF MAXIMUM STIP 
FORFEITED

205,720

132,469

91,169

64.5%

64.5%

41.6%

35.5%

35.5%

58.4%

The above FY23 STIP awards are payable in FY24. Mr Bryan Quinn joined the Company on 6 June 2023 and did not qualify for 
a FY23 STI.

(i)  Mr Andrew Graham was appointed as the Interim CEO from 19 November 2022 – 5 June 2023. The table above outlines the STI received related to the 

period he was the Interim CEO. 

(ii)  Mr Martin Cummings commenced 1 December 2022, STI prorated from 1 December 2022 – 30 June 2023.

(iii)  Mr Daniel Clifford resigned 19 November 2022, prorated from 1 July 2022 – 19 November 2022.

117 
—

AURELIA METALS 
 
 
 
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

6. HOW PERFORMANCE IS LINKED TO THE VARIABLE 
‘AT-RISK’ REMUNERATION FOR THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 
AND CEO AND OTHER KMP (CONTINUED) 
—

6.1 SHORT TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (STIP) (CONTINUED)

6.1.2 FY22 STIP outcomes

FY22

Executive Director

Daniel Clifford

Other KMP

Peter Trout

Ian Poole

TOTAL STIP AWARDED  
$

% OF MAXIMUM 
(STRETCH) STIP AWARDED

% OF MAXIMUM STIP 
FORFEITED

171,596

96,173

80,214

36%

36%

36%

64%

64%

64%

The FY22 STIP performance measures and the award outcomes are detailed in the FY22 Annual Report. 

The FY22 STIP awards were paid in FY23. 

6.2 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (LTIP)

An outline of the key elements of the Company’s LTIP as it relates to executive KMP is provided below:

Format of LTIP 

Performance Rights are granted to the relevant individual, which, upon satisfaction and testing of the 
vesting criteria (over a 3-year period), will allow one ordinary share in the Company to be issued for each 
Performance Right vested. 

The LTIP opportunity is determined by the individual’s role and level within the business. 

The LTIP for the Interim CEO was 75% of TFR for the period of the Interim CEO’s appointment. For other 
KMP LTIP is 75% of TFR. 

LTIP opportunity 

The actual number of performance rights issued to KMP was determined by dividing their respective LTIP 
opportunity by the 30-day VWAP of the Company’s share price as at 30 June 2022, being a VWAP of an 
Aurelia ordinary share of $0.30451 per share. 

The Managing Director and CEO does not have an LTI opportunity for FY23 as he commenced in 
June 2023. His LTI opportunity for FY24 is a maximum of 100% of TFR. 

Performance Period 

The performance period is three years from 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2025. 

Service condition 

Performance Measures 
and Weighting 

Vesting of Performance Rights is subject to a service condition. This condition is met if the KMP’s 
employment is continuous during the Performance Period. If a KMP ceases employment during the 
Performance Period, then the treatment of Performance Rights will depend on the circumstances of the 
employment ending, as outlined below under “Rights on Termination”. 

The performance measures and their respective weighting in the LTIP are established at the beginning of 
the financial year and are determined at the discretion of the Board. 

The LTIP performance measures are detailed below: 

Criteria

Relative TSR Rank

Growth (Ore Reserves per Share)

Weighting

60%

40%

118 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

6. HOW PERFORMANCE IS LINKED TO THE VARIABLE 
‘AT-RISK’ REMUNERATION FOR THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 
AND CEO AND OTHER KMP (CONTINUED) 
—

6.2 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (LTIP) (CONTINUED)

Targets and Vesting Schedule

Further detail on the LTIP targets and vesting at various levels of performance is included in Section 6.2.

Exercise of Discretion 

The Board has discretion, considering recommendations from the Remuneration Committee, to adjust the 
LTI vesting awards or an individual’s final LTI vesting. 

Entitlement on Vesting 

To the extent the performance criteria is satisfied (subject to the Service Condition and discretion of the 
Board), the Performance Rights will vest and be exercised at nil exercise price and the number of ordinary 
shares equal to the number of vested Performance Rights will be issued. 

Disposal Restrictions 

Shares granted to participants under the LTIP as a result of the vesting of Performance Rights are not 
subject to disposal restrictions outside of the Company’s Securities Trading Policy. 

Dividends 

No dividends are paid on unvested Performance Rights. 

Subject to the discretion of the Board, if a participant: 

Rights on Termination 

 Š ceases employment for any other reason, any unvested Performance Rights will lapse on cessation 

 Š is determined by the Board to be a Good Leaver, a pro-rata number of unvested Performance Rights 
will remain on foot and vest subject to the satisfaction of the applicable performance conditions. 

of employment. 

A Good Leaver is defined as termination in the event of death, permanent disability, redundancy, 
retirement or as the Board otherwise determines. 

Change of Control 

If the Board considers that the transaction has occurred or is likely to occur which involves a change in 
control (or other circumstances such as they recommend acceptance of a takeover bid), the Board may in 
its absolute discretion determine that any or all unvested Performance Rights vest. 

Participation in New Issues 

Any Performance Rights issued under the Company’s LTIP are not entitled to participate in any new 
equity raising activity. 

Malus Policy 

At its discretion, the Board may cancel or require KMP to forfeit any unvested LTI award made under 
the LTIP if it determines that, had the LTI vesting been made, the KMP would have received an 
‘inappropriate benefit’.  

6.2.1 LTIP performance rights issued FY23

Performance Rights issued to KMP 

The table below sets out the Performance Rights (Class FY23) that were granted to the Interim CEO and other KMP under the 
Company’s LTIP during FY23. The performance rights will be tested at the end of the three-year performance period, which ends 
on 30 June 2025. 

FY23 PERFORMANCE 
RIGHTS GRANTED 

FY23 PERFORMANCE 
RIGHTS LAPSED

FY23 PERFORMANCE 
RIGHTS ON FOOT

3,834,212

1,769,204

2,065,008

119 
—

AURELIA METALSREMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

6. HOW PERFORMANCE IS LINKED TO THE VARIABLE 
‘AT-RISK’ REMUNERATION FOR THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 
AND CEO AND OTHER KMP (CONTINUED) 
—

6.2 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (LTIP) (CONTINUED)

6.2.1 LTIP performance rights issued FY23 (Continued)

Performance hurdles for Class FY23 

The performance hurdles related to Class FY23, including relevant threshold and target measures, are detailed below.

LTIP SCORECARD

THRESHOLD

PRO-RATA

TARGET

Vesting % guide

Nil

50% to 100%

100%

Relative TSR* 

<50th percentile 

50th - 75th 
percentile 

75th percentile 
and above 

PERFORMANCE HURDLES 
ALIGNMENT TO LTIP 
OBJECTIVES 

Relative TSR measures the change in the share price and dividends 
paid over the performance period in comparison to a comparator 
group of companies. The comparator group of companies is comprised 
of ASX listed organisations which the Board considers by the nature of 
their business are influenced by commodity prices and other external 
factors similar to those that impact the Company, as disclosed under 
section 6.2.2. 

The Relative TSR measure aligns 
the reward of the executive KMP 
with returns to shareholders. If total 
shareholder return for the Company 
over the measurement period exceeds 
its comparator peer group, then 
shareholders will benefit and the LTIP 
measure allows executive KMP to be 
rewarded. 

Growth – 
Ore Reserve per share 

<100% of Baseline 

≥ 100% to 115% of 
Baseline

≥ 115% of Baseline

Measurement will be against the Company’s growth in Ore Reserves 
per share over the performance period. This will be done by comparing 
the baseline measure of the Ore Reserves (kilograms of ore as 
specified in the Group Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Statement) 
as at 1 July 2022 on a per share basis to the Ore Reserves (kilograms 
of ore as specified in the Group Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve 
Statement) as at 30 June 2025 on a per share basis, based on the 
number of shares on issue at each respective date. 

The Growth measure aligns the reward 
of the executive KMP with targeted 
long-term growth for the Company. 
It rewards executive KMP to replace and 
grow reserves over time to ensure the 
Company’s long-term success, taking 
into consideration the impact of any 
issue of additional equities. 

The baseline Ore Reserves per share as at 1 July 2022 was 4.61kg/
share. An outcome less than the baseline provides an outcome of nil 
vesting at the end of the performance period

* The measurement of the performance will be 30-day VWAP of shares up to and including 30 June 2025.

6.2.2  Relative FY23 TSR comparator group 

The comparator group at the start of the performance period includes: 29Metals (ASX: 29M), Aeris Resources (ASX: AIS); Alkane 
Resources Limited (ASX: ALK), Genesis Minerals Limited (ASX: GMD), Gold Road Resources Limited (ASX: GOR), Pantoro Limited 
(ASX: PNR), Ramelius Resources Limited (ASX: RMS), Red 5 Limited (ASX: RED), Regis Resources (ASX: RRL), Sandfire Resources 
Limited (ASX: SFR), Silver Lake Resources Limited (ASX: SLR), St Barbara Limited (ASX: SBM) and Westgold Resources Limited 
(ASX: WGX).

120 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

6. HOW PERFORMANCE IS LINKED TO THE VARIABLE 
‘AT-RISK’ REMUNERATION FOR THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 
AND CEO AND OTHER KMP (CONTINUED) 
—

6.2 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (LTIP) (CONTINUED)

6.2.3 LTIP Performance Rights Issued FY22 

The performance measures related to the FY22 performance rights (Class FY22) are detailed below.  

LTIP SCORECARD

THRESHOLD

Vesting % guide

Nil

PRO-RATA

50% to 100%

TARGET

100%

Relative TSR*

<50 percentile

50th – 75th percentile 

75th percentile and above

Relative TSR measures the change in the share price and dividends paid over the performance 
period in comparison to a comparator group of companies. The comparator group of companies is 
comprised of ASX listed organisations which the Board considers by the nature of their business 
are influenced by commodity prices and other external factors similar to those that impact 
the Company.

Growth –

<100% of Baseline

≥ 100% to 115% of Baseline

≥ 115% of Baseline

Ore Reserve per share

Measurement will be against the Company’s growth in Ore Reserves per share over the 
Performance Period. This will be done by comparing the baseline measure of the Ore Reserves 
as at 1 July 2021 (kilograms of ore as specified in the Group Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve 
Statement) on a per share basis to the Ore Reserves (kilograms of ore as specified in the Group 
Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Statement) as at 30 June 2024 on a per share basis, based on 
the number of shares on issue at each respective date. 

The baseline Ore Reserves per share as at 1 July 2021 was 3.56kg/share. An outcome less than the 
baseline provides an outcome of nil vesting at the end of the Performance Period.

* The measurement of the performance will be 30-day VWAP of shares up to and including 30 June 2024. 

121 
—

AURELIA METALSREMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

6. HOW PERFORMANCE IS LINKED TO THE VARIABLE 
‘AT-RISK’ REMUNERATION FOR THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 
AND CEO AND OTHER KMP (CONTINUED) 
—

6.2 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (LTIP) (CONTINUED)

6.2.4 Performance Rights - Vested during FY23 

The performance period for the Class FY21 Performance Rights ended on 30 June 2023. A total of 457,875 Performance Rights 
were able to vest, and of these a total of 274,460 Performance Rights were granted to former KMP. 

2020 (FY21) PERFORMANCE RIGHTS

NUMBER

% GRANTED 

% AVAILABLE 
TO VEST

Granted

Lapsed 

Unvested performance rights on hand 

Forfeited

Total Vested

Number Vested for KMP

6,318,537

(3,182,409)

3,136,128

2,678,253

457,875

274,460

100%

50%

50%

42%

7%

4%

100.0%

85.4%

14.6%

8.8%

The Performance Rights were tested against the four measurement criteria (each of equal weighting):

a) Absolute TSR hurdle – 25% weighting 

b) Relative TSR hurdle – 25% weighting 

c) Production Target hurdle – 25% weighting

d) Growth hurdle – 25% weighting

The outcome of the testing was that 0% vested against each of the Absolute TSR, Relative TSR and Growth hurdles. The 
Production Target hurdle achieved between 4 and 5 years and vested pro rata at 58.5%. The overall outcome was that 14.6% of 
the FY21 Performance Rights on foot vested. 

6.2.5 LTIP Performance Rights which remain untested 

The total number of performance rights granted to the Interim CEO and other KMP (including former KMP) that are yet to vest 
are detailed below: 

PERFORMANCE RIGHTS TRANCHES

TOTAL NUMBER ON ISSUE

RELEVANT DATE OR TESTING DATE

Class FY22

Class FY23

Total KMP Performance Rights

1,216,654

2,065,008

3,281,662

30-Jun-24

30-Jun-25

122 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

6. HOW PERFORMANCE IS LINKED TO THE VARIABLE 
‘AT-RISK’ REMUNERATION FOR THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 
AND CEO AND OTHER KMP (CONTINUED) 
—

6.2 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (LTIP) (CONTINUED)

6.2.6 Summary of movements in Performance Rights during the year 

A summary of movements of Performance Rights within the various plans are tabulated below: 

GRANT

GRANT 
DATE

EXPIRY 
OR TEST 
DATE

EXERCISE 
PRICE

BALANCE 
AT START 
OF YEAR

GRANTED 
DURING 
THE YEAR

VESTED 
DURING 
THE YEAR

EXPIRED 
DURING 
THE YEAR

BALANCE 
AS AT 30 
AUGUST 

Class 19A

29-11-19

30-06-22

Class FY21

19-11-20

30-06-23

Class FY21

26-12-20

30-06-23

Class FY22

04-11-21

30-06-24

Class FY22

09-11-21

30-06-24

Class FY23

08-12-22

30-06-25

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

2,284,641

1,696,714

3,755,760

1,866,231

-

-

-

-

6,401,029

31,198

-

11,544,184

(380,759)

(1,903,882)

(197,045)

(1,499,669)

(260,830)

(3,494,930)

-

-

-

-

-

-

(1,004,632)

861,599

(3,905,046)

2,527,181

(3,275,884)

8,268,300

Total

16,004,375

11,575,382

(838,634)

(15,084,043)

11,657,080

Total KMP Performance Rights

8,508,951

3,384,212

(602,893)

(8,458,608)

3,281,662

Total Non-KMP Performance Rights

7,495,424

7,741,170

(235,741)

(6,625,435)

8,375,418

Total

16,004,375

11,575,382

(838,634)

(15,084,043)

11,657,080

123 
—

AURELIA METALSREMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

6. HOW PERFORMANCE IS LINKED TO THE VARIABLE 
‘AT-RISK’ REMUNERATION FOR THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 
AND CEO AND OTHER KMP (CONTINUED) 
—

6.3 DETAILS OF SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION TO THE MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CEO 
AND OTHER KMP

Details on rights over ordinary shares in the Company that were granted as compensation KMP and details of rights that vested 
during the reporting period are as follows:

TEST 
DATE

NUMBER 
OF RIGHTS 
GRANTED

GRANT 
DATE

FAIR 
VALUE AT 
GRANT $/
RIGHT

FAIR 
VALUE AT 
VESTING 
$/RIGHT

NUMBER 
OF RIGHTS 
VESTED

NUMBER 
OF RIGHTS 
LAPSED

BALANCE 
AS AT 30 
AUGUST

CLASS*

Other KMP

Peter Trout

Class 19A

30-06-22

 618,812

29-11-19

 0.290

Class FY21

30-06-23

776,665

26-12-20

Class FY22

30-06-24

854,606

09-11-21

Class FY23

30-06-25

1,312,546

08-12-22

0.285

0.300

0.081

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

(103,131)

(515,681)

-

-

-

(776,665)

(854,606)

(1,312,546)

3,562,629

(103,131)

(3,459,498)

-

-

-

-

-

Martin Cummings

Class FY23

30-06-25

1,088,634

8-12-22

0.081

n/a

1,088,634

Interim CEO

Andrew Graham**

Class FY23

30-06-25

884,241

08-12-22

0.081

n/a

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1,088,634

1,088,634

884,241

884,241

884,241

Former Director and KMP ***

Daniel Clifford

Class 19A

30-06-22

1,351,866

29-11-19

Class FY21

30-06-23

1,696,714

19-12-20

Class FY22

30-06-24

1,866,231

04-11-21

4,914,811

Ian Poole

Class FY21

30-06-23

635,241

26-12-20

Class FY22

30-06-24

708,816

09-11-21

Class FY23

30-06-25

548,791

08-12-22

0.310

0.303

0.286

0.285

0.300

0.081

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

(225,302)

(1,126,564)

(197,045)

(1,499,669)

-

-

-

(1,004,632)

861,599

(422,347)

(3,630,865)

861,599

(77,415)

(557,826)

-

-

-

(353,761)

355,055

(456,658)

92,133

1,892,848

(77,415)

(1,368,245)

447,188

* All classes of Performance Rights that vest into fully paid ordinary shares, vest at a nil exercise price. 
** The number of rights granted to Mr Graham in the table relate to the period he was the Interim CEO. 
*** Mr Clifford and Mr Poole were deemed “good leavers” and therefore, on a pro-rata basis, retained some of their unvested performance rights.

124 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
 
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

7. MALUS POLICY 
—

The underlying principle of the policy is that an Executive of the Company should not receive performance-based ‘at-risk’ 
remuneration (including any STI reward prior to payment, unvested LTI award and any other performance-based component of 
remuneration prior to payment or vesting) if the Board determines that such remuneration would be an “inappropriate benefit”.

The Board may, in its absolute discretion, exercised in good faith, elect to apply the policy so that an Executive does not receive 
an “inappropriate benefit” where: 

a) the Executive has been terminated for cause (including for fraud, dishonesty or gross misconduct);

b) the Executive intentionally or recklessly caused or contributed to a material misstatement or omission in any release made by 

the Company to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX); or

c) the Executive is engaging in, or has engaged in, behaviour or conduct that may negatively impact on the Group’s standing, 
long-term financial strength, reputation, or relationship with its key regulators, or otherwise brings the Company or any 
member of the Group into disrepute.

d) In such instances, the Board reserves the right to adjust or cancel some or all the Executive’s performance-based 

‘at-risk’ remuneration.

8. NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REMUNERATION 
—

The Company’s remuneration strategy and objective for Non-Executive Directors is to remunerate at a level which attracts and 
retains Non-Executive Directors of the requisite expertise and experience at a market rate which is comparable to other similar 
size companies and considers the time, commitment and responsibilities involved in being a Non-Executive Director of Aurelia. 

The Remuneration Committee is responsible for reviewing and advising the Board on Non-Executive Director remuneration. 
Guidance is obtained as required from independent industry surveys and other sources to ensure that the Director’s fees are 
appropriate and in line with the market. 

Following shareholder approval on 19 November 2020, the aggregate fee pool available for Non-Executive Director remuneration 
was increased from $750,000 to $1,000,000 per annum. Non-Executive Director fees have remained unchanged since 2021.

The fee structure also provides for fees relating to Board committee responsibilities. 

Structure

The aggregate fee pool available for Non-Executive Director remuneration is $1,000,000 per annum. The Board fees and the fees 
related to Board committee responsibilities, are summarised below: 

ROLE

Chair of the Board of Directors

Non-Executive Director

Chair of a Board Committee

Member of a Board Committee

*Inclusive of superannuation

EFFECTIVE 1 APRIL 2021 
FEE PER ANNUM $*

200,000

100,000

15,000

10,000

125 
—

AURELIA METALSREMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

9. REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER KMP  
—

The following table details the remuneration received and entitlements by Directors and KMP of the Company during FY23.

/
Y
R
A
L
A
S
E
S
A
B

S
E
E
F
S
R
O
T
C
E
R
D

I

$

FY23

Non-Executive Directors

Peter Botten

180,995

Susie Corlett

113,122

Bruce Cox (i)

86,727

Paul Harris

125,000

Bob Vassie

114,299

Helen Gillies

120,000

Former Non-Executive Director

Lawrence  
Conway (ii)

19,167

Sub-total

759,310

Managing Director & CEO

SHORT TERM

C
O
H
-
D
A
/
S
E
C
N
A
W
O
L
L
A

S
U
N
O
B

$

Y
R
A
T
E
N
O
M
-
N
O
N

S
T

I
F
E
N
E
B

$

I

D
N
A
N
O
T
A
N
M
R
E
T

I

E
V
A
E
L
L
A
U
N
N
A

POST-
EMPLOYMENT

SHARE-
BASED 
PAYMENT

D
E
U
R
C
C
A

$

*
T
N
E
M
Y
A
P
P
T
S

I

$

I

N
O
T
A
U
N
N
A
R
E
P
U
S

$

E
U
L
A
V
D
E
S
T
R
O
M
A

I

$

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

19,005

11,878

8,314

-

5,701

-

-

44,898

2,292

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

TOTAL 
$

‘AT- 
RISK’ 
% 

200,000

125,000

95,041

125,000

120,000

120,000

19,167

804,208

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

69,664

0%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Bryan Quinn 
(iii)

Other KMP

57,574

3,754

732

5,312

Peter Trout

505,411

Martin 
Cummings (vi)

223,091

-

-

8,781

19,467

27,500

190,494

751,653

25%

4,000

22,055

132,469

13,750

19,813

415,178

37%

Interim CEO

Andrew 
Graham (iv)

298,991

125,000

4,391

12,846

205,720

15,748

16,093

678,789

33%

Former Director & KMP

Daniel Clifford 
(v)

280,798

10,417

3,659

364,387

91,169

11,572

(11,035)

750,967

11%

Ian Poole (vii)

207,250

-

4,391

(230)

-

16,042

16,818

244,271

7%

Sub-total

1,573,115

139,171

25,954

423,837

429,358

Total

2,332,425

139,171

25,954

423,837

429,358

86,904

131,802

232,183

2,910,522

232,183

3,714,730

11% 

8% 

(i)  Mr Bruce Cox was appointed as an Independent Non-Executive Director on 1 September 2022.

(ii)  Mr Lawrence Conway resigned as an Independent Non-Executive Director on 31 August 2022. 

126 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

9. REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER KMP (CONTINUED) 

(iii)  Mr Bryan Quinn was appointed as the Managing Director and CEO on 6 June 2023, as part of Mr Bryan Quinn’s package he is entitled to sign on 
shares which will be put to shareholders for approval at the AGM in November 2023. The value of the shares for his employment during FY23 is 
$8,545. As part of Mr Bryan Quinn’s package, he is entitled to a travel allowance, relocation assistance, a motor vehicle, and an allowance for Executive 
Coaching. The allowance listed in the table represents the travel allowance received by Mr Quinn in FY23. No other costs were incurred in FY23.

(iv)  Mr Andrew Graham was appointed as the Interim Managing Director and CEO from 19 November 2022 – 5 June 2023. The table above outlines the 

remuneration received for the period he was the Interim CEO. 

(v)  Mr Daniel Clifford resigned as Managing Director and CEO on 18 November 2022. 

(vi)  Mr Martin Cummings was appointed as the Chief Financial Officer on 1 December 2022.

(vii)  Mr Ian Poole retired as the Chief Financial Officer on 31 December 2022 and was paid his accrued annual leave balance.

*Payments related to the 2023 STI Plan will be paid in FY24. Payments related to the 2022 STI Plan were paid in FY23. 

** The leave entitlements movement includes long service leave and annual leave movements during FY23.

The following table details the remuneration received by Directors and KMP of the Company during FY22 ($).

SHORT TERM

Y
R
A
T
E
N
O
M
-
N
O
N

S
T

I
F
E
N
E
B

T
N
E
M
E
L
T

I

T
N
E
E
V
A
E
L

*
*
S
T
N
E
M
E
V
O
M

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

*
T
N
E
M
Y
A
P
P
T
S

I

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

/
Y
R
A
L
A
S
E
S
A
B

S
E
E
F
S
R
O
T
C
E
R
D

I

FY22

Non-Executive Directors

Peter  
Botten (i)

Lawrence 
Conway

Susie 
Corlett (ii)

132,230

115,000

145,317

Paul Harris

125,000

Bob Vassie

109,091

Helen Gillies

111,818

Sub-total

738,456

Managing Director & CEO

S
E
C
N
A
W
O
L
L
A

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

POST-
EMPLOYMENT

SHARE-
BASED 
PAYMENT

I

N
O
T
A
U
N
N
A
R
E
P
U
S

13,223

-

14,713

-

10,909

8,182

47,027

E
U
L
A
V
D
E
S
T
R
O
M
A

I

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

TOTAL

‘AT- 
RISK’ 

145,453

0%

115,000

0%

160,030

0%

125,000

120,000

120,000

785,483

0%

0%

0%

0%

Daniel 
Clifford

Other KMP

725,505

25,000

7,200

37,944

171,596

27,500

423,598

1,418,343

42%

Peter Trout

503,000

Ian Poole

412.500

-

-

7,200

11,852

96,713

27,500

135,747

782,012

30%

7,200

8,011

80,214

27,500

123,181

658,606

31%

Sub-total

1,641,005

25,000

21,600

57,807

348,523

82,500

682,526

2,858,961

38%

Total

2,379,461

25,000

21,600

57,807

348,523

129,527

682,526

3,644,444

30%

(i)  Mr Peter Botten was appointed as Independent Non-Executive Director on 13 September 2021 and was appointed as Chair on 4 November 2021. 
(ii)  Ms Susie Corlett served as the Interim Chair during the period 2 March 2021 to 4 November 2021.

* Payments related to the 2022 STI Plan were paid in FY23. Payments related to the 2021 STI Plan were paid in FY22.

** The leave entitlements movement includes long service leave and annual leave movements during FY22. 

127 
—

AURELIA METALS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

10. SHAREHOLDINGS OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER KMP  
—

All equity transactions with KMP, other than those arising from the exercise of remuneration related to Performance Rights, 
or the Employee Share Scheme have been entered into under terms and agreements no more favourable than those 
the Company would have adopted if dealing at arm’s length. 

The Company does not have a policy or a requirement for Non-Executive Directors to hold shares in the Company. 

The shareholdings of Directors and other KMP for FY23 is presented below and includes shares held directly, indirectly, 
and beneficially by the Directors and other KMP.

FY23

Directors

Peter Botten 

Susie Corlett 

Paul Harris 

Bob Vassie 

Helen Gillies 

Bruce Cox (i)

Bryan Quinn (ii)

Other KMP

Peter Trout * 

Martin Cummings (iii)*

Former Directors 

Daniel Clifford**

Lawrence Conway** 

Former KMP

Ian Poole** 

Total

BALANCE START 
OF YEAR

PERFORMANCE 
RIGHTS VESTED

OTHER CHANGES 
DURING YEAR

BALANCE END 
OF YEAR

- 

33,731 

- 

250,000 

250,000 

-

-

4,936 

- 

3,130,402 

225,850 

4,936

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

-

-

103,131 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

-

50,000

9,331 

409,331 

225,302 

(3,355,704) 

- 

-

(225,850) 

(4,936)

- 

33,731 

- 

250,000 

250,000 

-

50,000

117,398 

409,331

- 

- 

-

3,899,855 

328,433 

(3,117,828) 

1,110,460

(i)  Mr Bruce Cox was appointed as an Independent Non-Executive Director on 1 September 2022.

(ii)  Mr Bryan Quinn was appointed as Managing Director and CEO on 6 June 2023. Mr Bryan Quinn held shares in the Company prior to his 

commencement. as part of Mr Bryan Quinn’s package he is entitled to sign on shares which will be put to shareholders for approval at the AGM in 
November 2023.

(iii)  Mr Martin Cummings was appointed as CFO on 1 December 2022. Mr Cummings held shares in the Company prior to his commencement. 

Further shares were acquired by Mr Cummings on market during the period. 

*Mr Trout and Mr Cummings participated in the FY23 Employee Share Plan. Mr Trout ceased to be a KMP subsequent to the end of the reporting period.

** Mr Clifford, Mr Conway and Mr Poole ceased office with the Company prior to the end of the reporting period. 

128 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

10. SHAREHOLDINGS OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER KMP (CONTINUED) 
—

Note: On 5 July 2023, the shares under the Company’s Retail Entitlement Offer were issued. As existing shareholders, Mr Vassie, 
Ms Gillies, Mr Quinn, Mr Trout and Mr Cummings participated in the Retail Entitlement Offer.  

Refer to Section 2 of Director’s Report for current shareholdings of directors at the date of this report. 

The shareholdings of Directors and other KMP for FY22 are presented below and includes shares held directly, indirectly, and 
beneficially by the Directors and other KMP. 

FY22

Directors

Peter Botten (i)

Daniel Clifford

Lawrence Conway

Susie Corlett

Paul Harris

Bob Vassie (i)

Helen Gillies (ii)

Other KMP

Peter Trout 

Ian Poole

Total

(i) appointed 13 September 2021

BALANCE START 
OF YEAR

PERFORMANCE 
RIGHTS VESTED

OTHER CHANGES 
DURING YEAR

BALANCE END 
OF YEAR

-

1,565,201

225,850

33,731

-

250,000

250,000

2,362

2,362

-

1,565,201

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2,329,506

1,565,201

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2,574

2,574

5,148

-

3,130,402

225,850

33,731

-

250,000

250,000

4,936

4,936

3,899,855

10.1 MANAGING DIRECTOR & CEO SIGN ON SHARES

The new Managing Director and CEO was appointed on 6 June 2023. As part of the employment arrangements for the new 
Managing Director and CEO, he is to be issued 4,524,197 ordinary shares in the Company (equivalent to $500,000 divided by 
the VWAP during the 5 Business Days prior to 31 May 2023), with the issue of the shares being subject to shareholder approval. 
If shareholder approval is obtained, these shares will be subject to a holding lock, with a third of the shares released on each 
of the first, second and third anniversary of approval. Any shares still the subject of a holding lock will also be released upon 
the event of a change in control of the Company or if there is a Fundamental Change in the Managing Director and CEO’s 
employment (as described in Section 5 Service agreement key terms).

129 
—

AURELIA METALSREMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)

11. COMPANY PERFORMANCE AND REMUNERATION OUTCOMES  
—

Aurelia remuneration framework aims to create aims to create a link between Company performance and executive reward. 
The following table and graph represent a summary of business performance. 

YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE

Sales Revenue

EBITDA

Profit/(loss) after income tax

Cash from operating activities

Closing Share Price (cents)

2023 
$’000

369,202

55,803

(52,221)

45,864

9

2022 
$’000

438,815

166,472

(81,688)

154,093

26

2021 
$’000

416,477

154,069

42,917

136,643

41

2020 
$’000

331,819

103,447

29,442

110,531

50

2019 
$’000

295,002

103,063

36,017

106,783

49

Monthly Average Share Price and Trading Volumes

350,000

300,000

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0

0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00

1
2
-
l

u
J

1
2
-
g
u
A

1
2
-
p
e
S

1
2
-
t
c
O

1
2
-
v
o
N

1
2
-
c
e
D

2
2
-
n
a
J

2
2
-
b
e
F

2
2
-
r
a
M

2
2
-
r
p
A

2
2
-
y
a
M

2
2
-
n
u
J

2
2
-
l

u
J

2
2
-
g
u
A

2
2
-
p
e
S

2
2
-
t
c
O

2
2
-
v
o
N

2
2
-
c
e
D

3
2
-
n
a
J

3
2
-
b
e
F

3
2
-
r
a
M

3
2
-
r
p
A

3
2
-
y
a
M

3
2
-
n
u
J

Monthly Trading Volume '000

Average Price

12. OTHER MATTERS  
—

12.1 LOANS GIVEN TO KMP

No loans have been provided by the Company to KMP. 

12.2 OTHER TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND KMP OR THEIR 
RELATED PARTIES

No other transactions have been entered into between the Company and KMP and/or their related parties. 

130 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 
—

Ernst & Young 
111 Eagle Street 
Brisbane  QLD  4000 Australia 
GPO Box 7878 Brisbane  QLD  4001 

  Tel: +61 7 3011 3333 
Fax: +61 7 3011 3100 
ey.com/au 

Auditor’s Independence Declaration to the Directors of  
Aurelia Metals Limited 

As lead auditor for the audit of the financial report of Aurelia Metals Limited for the financial year 
ended 30 June 2023, I declare to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been: 

a)  no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in 

relation to the audit;  

b)  no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit; and 

c)  no non-audit services provided that contravene any applicable code of professional conduct in 

relation to the audit. 

This declaration is in respect of Aurelia Metals Limited and the entities it controlled during the financial 
year. 

Ernst & Young 

Kellie McKenzie 
Partner 
30 August 2023   

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited 
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

131 
—

AURELIA METALS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS 
AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
—

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2023

NOTE

Sales Revenue

Cost of sales

Gross (Loss)/Profit

Corporate administration expenses

Rehabilitation (expense)/reversal of expense

Share based payment expense

Impairment loss

Other expenses

Other income

(Loss) before income tax and net finance costs

Finance income

Finance costs

(Loss) before income tax expense

Income tax benefit

(Loss) after income tax expense

Other Comprehensive Income 
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:

Cash flow hedges, net of tax 

Total comprehensive income for the year

Earnings per share for Profit attributable to the ordinary equity holders 
of the parent 

Basic earnings per share (cents per share)

Diluted earnings per share (cents per share)

The above Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

3

4

4

13

21

4

4

3

3

4

5

20

20

2023 
$’000

369,202

(403,000)

(33,798)

(14,848)

3,274

(797)

(20,846)

(2,369)

211

(69,173)

2,161

(6,861)

2022 
$’000

438,815

(416,366)

22,449

(14,561)

(3,531)

(1,780)

(135,687)

(1,286)

27,365

(107,031)

227

(7,234)

(73,873)

(114,038)

21,652

(52,221)

32,350

(81,688)

1,964

(50,257)

(4,456)

(86,144)

(4.16)

(4.16)

(6.61)

(6.61)

132 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT 
OF FINANCIAL POSITION 
—

NOTE

2023 
$’000

2022 
$’000

Assets

Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Trade and other receivables

Inventories

Prepayments

Derivative financial instruments

Income tax receivable 

Total current assets

Non-current assets

Property, plant and equipment

Mine properties

Exploration and evaluation assets

Right of use assets

Restricted cash

Financial assets

Deferred tax assets

Total non-current assets

Total assets

Liabilities

Current Liabilities

Trade and other payables

Interest bearing loans and borrowings

Provisions

Lease liabilities

Other financial liabilities

Derivative financial instruments

Total current liabilities

6

7

8

22

9

10

11

14

6

5

12

15

13

14

16

22

38,946

7,677

29,230

5,221

69

21,177

102,320

118,287

143,074

9,667

4,943

56,833

718

8,558

342,080

444,400

28,479

3,635

7,724

3,041

6,803

-

76,694

18,100

43,908

3,103

-

9,648

151,453

 156,027 

 123,533 

71,728

19,414

30,746

1,105

8,244

410,797

562,250

65,770

17,410

11,930

11,065

6,947

3,103

49,682

116,225

133 
—

AURELIA METALSSTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION (CONTINUED) 
—

Non-current liabilities

Provisions

Interest bearing loans and borrowings

Lease liabilities

Other financial liabilities

Total non-current liabilities

Total liabilities

Net assets

Equity

Contributed equity

Share based payments reserve

Hedge reserve

Retained earnings

Total equity

The above Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

NOTE

13

15

14

16

17

18

18

19

2023 
$’000

78,164

4,047

1,969

713

84,893

134,575

309,825

357,018

13,919

-

(61,112)

309,825

2022 
$’000

87,956 

8,591

8,424

4,128

109,099

225,324

336,926

334,659

13,122

(1,964)

(8,891)

336,926

134 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT  
OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 
—

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2023

NOTE

Balance at 1 July 2021

Total (Loss) for the period

Other comprehensive income

18

Total Comprehensive Income 

Transactions with owners in their capacity 
as owners

Shares issued, net of costs

Share-based payments

Dividend payments

21

17

ISSUED 
SHARE 
CAPITAL 
$’000

SHARE 
BASED 
PAYMENTS 
RESERVE  
$’000

RETAINED 
EARNINGS/ 
ACCUMULATED 
LOSSES 
$’000

HEDGE 
RESERVE 
$’000

TOTAL 
$’000

334,659

11,342

2,492

72,797

421,290

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1,780

-

-

(81,688)

(81,688)

(4,456)

(4,456)

-

(4,456)

(81,688)

(86,144)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1,780

-

Balance at 30 June 2022

334,659

13,122

(1,964)

(8,891)

336,926

334,659

13,122

(1,964)

(8,891)

336,926

Balance at 1 July 2022

Total (Loss) for the period

Other comprehensive income

18

Total Comprehensive Income 

-

-

-

Transactions with owners in their capacity 
as owners

Shares issued, net of costs

Share-based payments

Dividend payments

22,359

-

-

21

17

-

-

-

-

797

-

Balance at 30 June 2023

357,018

13,919

The above Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes

-

1,964

1,964

(52,221)

(52,221)

-

1,964

(52,221)

(50,257)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

22,359

797

-

(61,112)

309,825

135 
—

AURELIA METALSCONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 
—

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2023

NOTE

2023 
$’000

2022 
$’000

Cash flows from operating activities 

Receipts from customers

Payments to suppliers and employees

Receipts/(payments) for hedge settlements and foreign exchange

Interest received

Interest and finance charges paid

Income tax refund

Net cash flows from operating activities

23

Cash flows from investing activities 

Payments for the purchase of property, plant and equipment

Payments for mine capital expenditure

Payments for exploration and evaluation

Payments for facility cash cover and security deposits

Payments for deferred consideration and royalty costs

Net cash flows used in investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Principal element of lease payments

Repayment of loan and borrowings 

Proceeds from the issue of shares

Payments for transaction costs related to issuance of securities

Repayments of equipment loans

Proceeds from borrowings

Dividend payment to shareholders

Net cash flows (used in) /from financing activities

Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

Net foreign exchange difference

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year

The above Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

17

6

362,461

(325,502)

2,023

2,161

(5,711)

10,432

45,864

(7,123)

(28,359)

(10,972)

(26,087)

(4,832)

(77,373)

(9,376)

(20,700)

23,564

(1,205)

(3,105)

4,056

-

(6,766)

(38,275)

527

76,694

38,946

453,469

(300,379)

(7,423)

226

(4,480)

12,680

154,093

(17,359)

(57,786)

(30,107)

(22,142)

(4,069)

(131,463)

(10,732)

(16,762)

-

-

-

7,327

    -

(20,167)

2,463

(301)

74,532

76,694

136 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
—

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION 
—

Aurelia Metals Limited is a company limited by shares, incorporated, and domiciled in Australia, whose shares are publicly traded 
on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX).

Aurelia has the following wholly owned subsidiaries incorporated in Australia:

ENTITY NAME

INCORPORATION DATE

Big Island Mining Pty Ltd

Dargues Gold Mines Pty Ltd

Defiance Resources Pty Ltd

Hera Resources Pty Ltd

Nymagee Resources Pty Ltd

Peak Gold Asia Pacific Ltd

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

3 February 2005

12 January 2006

15 May 2006

20 August 2009

7 November 2011

26 February 2003

31 October 1977

The nature of the operations and principal activities of the consolidated group are gold, copper, lead, zinc and silver production 
and mineral exploration.

The financial report of Aurelia Limited and its subsidiaries for the year ended 30 June 2023 was authorised for issue in 
accordance with a resolution of the Directors on 29 August 2023.

1.1 Basis of preparation

The financial report is a general-purpose financial report, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the 
Corporations Act 2001, Australian Accounting Standards, and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting 
Standards Board.

The financial report also complies with the International Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting 
Standards Board.

The financial report has been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for investments, derivative instruments, contingent 
consideration, and deferred consideration costs which are measured at fair value. The financial report has been presented in 
Australian dollars, which is the functional currency of the Company. All values are rounded to the nearest thousand ($’000), 
except when otherwise indicated under the option available to the Company under ASIC Corporations (Rounding in Financial/
Directors’ Reports) Instrument 2016/191. The Company is an entity to which this legislative instrument applies.

1.2 Going concern

The financial report has been prepared on a going concern basis which contemplates the continuity of normal business activities 
and the realisation of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. To ensure the Group can meet its 
working capital and sustaining and expansionary capital expenditure requirements in the ordinary course of business, the Group 
routinely monitors its available cash and liquidity. During FY23 the Company announced it had refinanced the existing debt 
facilities through a new ~A$100 million financing package from Trafigura Pte Ltd. Accompanying this was a A$40 million equity 
raise which was completed in early July 2023. Financial close on the Trafigura facilities was achieved in August 2023. To the 
extent necessary, the Group considers financing and other capital management strategies, to ensure appropriate funding for its 
current operations and future growth ambitions. 

137 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION (CONTINUED) 
—

1.3 Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Aurelia and its subsidiaries.

The financial statements of subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the Company, using consistent 
accounting policies. Adjustments are made to bring into line any dissimilar accounting policies that may exist. In preparing the 
consolidated financial statements, all intercompany balances and transactions, income and expenses and profit and losses 
resulting from intra-group transactions, have been eliminated in full.

1.4 Foreign currency and translation

1.4.1 Functional and Presentation Currency

Both the functional and presentation currency of Aurelia and its controlled entities is Australian Dollars ($ or A$). The Group does 
not have any foreign operations.

1.4.2 Transactions and Balances

Transactions in foreign currency are initially recorded in the foreign currency at the exchange rates ruling at the date of 
transaction. The subsequent payment or receipt of funds related to a transaction is translated at the rate applicable on the date 
of payment or receipt. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are re-translated at the rate of exchange 
ruling at the reporting date. All exchange differences in the consolidated financial statements are taken to the Statement of 
profit or loss as gain or loss on exchange.

1.5 Other accounting policies

Significant and other accounting policies that summarise the measurement basis used and are relevant to an understanding of 
the financial statements are provided throughout the notes to the financial statements.

138 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

2. OPERATING SEGMENTS AND PERFORMANCE 
—

2.1 IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SEGMENTS

The consolidated entity applies AASB 8 Operating Segments which requires a management approach under which segment 
information is presented on the same basis as that used for internal reporting purposes.

An operating segment is a component of an entity that engages in business activities from which it may earn income and incur 
expenses (including income and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same entity), whose operating 
results are regularly reviewed by the entity's Chief Operating Decision Makers (CODM), to determine how resources are to be 
allocated to the segment and assess its performance. Management will also consider other factors in determining operating 
segments such as the existence of a line manager and the level of segment information presented to the Board of Directors.

The Consolidated Entity has identified its operating segments based on the internal reports that are reviewed and used by the 
Managing Director & CEO and the Board of Directors (the Chief Operating Decision Makers) in assessing performance and in 
determining the allocation of resources.

The Consolidated Entity operates entirely in the industry of exploration, development, and mining of minerals in Australia. 
The reportable segments are split between the operating mine sites (Hera, Peak and Dargues mines), and corporate and 
administrative activities. Financial information about each of these segments is reported to the Managing Director and Board 
of Directors monthly.

Corporate and administrative activities are not allocated to operating segments and form part of the reconciliation to net profit 
after tax and includes share-based expenses and other administrative expenditures incurred to support the business during 
the period.

Segment performance is evaluated based on earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA).

2.2 ACCOUNTING POLICIES ADOPTED

Unless otherwise stated, all amounts reported to the CODM with respect to operating segments are determined in accordance 
with accounting policies that are consistent with those adopted in the annual financial statements of the consolidated entity.

2.3 SEGMENT REVENUE

The revenue from external parties reported to the CODM is measured in a manner consistent with that of the statement of profit 
and loss and other comprehensive income.

Revenues from external customers are derived from the sale of metal in concentrate and gold and silver doré. The revenue from 
gold and silver doré sales is attributable to various counterparties with the largest customer accounting for 10% of the total sales 
revenue (FY22: 37%). The concentrate revenue arises from sales to various customers with the largest customer accounting for 
40% of total sales revenue (FY22: 52%).

2.4 SEGMENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Where an asset is used across multiple segments the asset is allocated to the segment that receives most of the economic value 
from the asset. In most instances, segment assets are clearly identifiable based on their nature and physical location.

Liabilities are allocated to segments where there is a direct nexus between the liability and the operations of the segment. 
Borrowings and tax liabilities are generally considered to relate to the whole consolidated entity and are not allocated. Segment 
liabilities include trade and other payables and other certain direct borrowings. 

139 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

2. OPERATING SEGMENTS AND PERFORMANCE (CONTINUED) 
—

2.5 SEGMENT INFORMATION

Unallocated items

The following items are not allocated to operating segments, as they are not considered part of the core operations 
of any segment:

 Š interest and other income; 

 Š share based payment expense; 

 Š acquisition and integration costs and stamp duty expense;

 Š fair value adjustments/remeasurements at balance date related to financial assets and liabilities; and 

 Š foreign exchange, commodity derivative transactions, investment revaluations, fair value adjustments, debt restructuring 

and gain/loss on the sale of financial assets.

The segment information for the reportable segments is as follows:

YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2023

NOTE

PEAK 
MINE 
$’000

HERA 
MINE  
$’000

DARGUES 
MINE  
$’000

CORPORATE & 
ELIMINATION 
$’000

TOTAL 
$’000

Sales revenue

Site EBITDA

3

200,801

69,086

99,315

37,996

(4,029)

35,633

-

-

369,202

69,600

Reconciliation of profit before tax expense:

Impairment loss 

Depreciation and amortisation expense

Corporate costs

Interest income and expense, net

Rehabilitation expenses

Share based payment expenses

Other operating income

Other expenses

Income tax expense

Profit after income tax

4

21

5

(20,846)

(103,398)

(14,848)

(4,700)

3,274

(797)

211

(2,369)

 21,652

(52,221)

Segment assets and liabilities

Total assets

Total liabilities

PEAK 
MINE 
$’000

HERA 
MINE  
$’000

DARGUES 
MINE  
$’000

CORPORATE & 
ELIMINATION 
$’000

TOTAL 
$’000

 188,307 

 80,617 

 46,334

129,142

444,400

 (77,208)

 (19,533)

 (28,690)

 (9,144)

(134,575)

(i)  Hera Mine was transitioned into care and maintenance in April 2023, the segment reporting for Hera mine also includes any costs that have been 

incurred for the Federation project. The total assets and total liabilities balances also includes Federation balances.

140 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

2. OPERATING SEGMENTS AND PERFORMANCE (CONTINUED) 
—

2.5 SEGMENT INFORMATION (CONTINUED)

YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2022

NOTE

PEAK 
MINE 
$’000

HERA 
MINE  
$’000

DARGUES 
MINE  
$’000

CORPORATE & 
ELIMINATION 
$’000

Sales revenue

Site EBITDA

3

219,908

126,658

92,249

 74,683 

 40,772 

 44,215 

-

-

Reconciliation of profit before tax expense:

Impairment loss 

Depreciation and amortisation expense

Corporate costs

Interest income and expense, net

Rehabilitation expenses

Share based payment expenses

Other operating income

Other expenses

Income tax expense

Profit after income tax

4

21

5

TOTAL 
$’000

438,815

159,670

(135,687)

(137,221)

(14,561)

(7,007)

(3,531)

(1,780)

27,365

(1,286)

 32,350

(81,688)

Segment assets and liabilities

Total assets

Total liabilities

PEAK 
MINE 
$’000

HERA 
MINE  
$’000

DARGUES 
MINE  
$’000

CORPORATE & 
ELIMINATION 
$’000

TOTAL 
$’000

 232,039 

 115,900 

 88,417

125,894

562,250

 (97,063)

 (54,192)

 (40,470)

 (33,599)

(225,324)

141 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

3. SALES REVENUE AND OTHER INCOME 
—

Profit before income tax includes the following revenues and other income whose disclosure is relevant in explaining the 
performance of the Group.

Sales revenue

Gold

Copper

Lead

Zinc

Silver

NOTE

2023 
$’000

223,721

30,505

55,841

50,160

8,975

2022 
$’000

228,378

32,547

63,140

97,308

17,442

Total sales revenue from contracts with customers

369,202

438,815

Other income

Sundry income

Fair value adjustments/remeasurement of financial assets and liabilities 

Fair value adjustment of financial assets 

Remeasurement of financial liabilities 

16

Total other income

Total finance income

Recognition and measurement

Sales revenue

Gold and silver doré sales

211

-

-

-

234

-

-

27,131

211

27,365

2,161

227

Revenue from gold and silver doré sales is recognised when control has been transferred to the counterparty (which is at the 
point where the doré leaves the gold room at the mine site, or when the gold metal credits are transferred to the customer’s 
account) and once the quantity of the gold and silver and the selling prices are known or have been reasonably determined.

Gold, lead, zinc, copper and silver in concentrate sales

Recognition of revenue from metal in concentrate sales contracts with customers is dependent upon the individual contract with 
each customer, for each mine site. Depending on the contract, the Incoterms may be Cost, Insurance and Freight (CIF), Carriage 
and Insurance Paid (CIP), or Free On Board (FOB).

The Group generates concentrate sales revenue primarily from the obligation to transfer concentrate to the customer. As the 
Group sells some of the concentrate on CIF and CIP Incoterms, the freight/shipping services provided (as principal) under these 
contracts with customers to facilitate the sale of concentrate represent a secondary performance obligation.

Revenue is allocated between the performance obligations and is recognised as each performance obligation is met, which for the 
primary obligation occurs when the concentrate is delivered to a vessel or location, and for the secondary obligation, if applicable, 
is when the concentrate is delivered to the location specified by the customer. Revenue arising from the secondary obligation, if 
assessed as immaterial to the Group, is aggregated with the primary performance obligation for disclosure purposes.

142 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

3. SALES REVENUE AND OTHER INCOME (CONTINUED) 
—

Quotation period

As is industry practice, the terms of metal in concentrate sales contracts with third parties contain provisional pricing 
arrangements whereby the selling price for metal in concentrate is determined based on the market price prevailing at a future 
date (quotation period). Revenue for the primary performance obligation is measured based on the fair value of the consideration 
specified in a contract with the customer at the time of settling the performance obligation and is determined by reference to 
forward market prices. Provisional pricing adjustments, which occur between the fair value at the time of settling the primary 
performance obligation and the final price, have been assessed and are recorded within revenue from concentrate sales.

Freight services performance obligation

The freight service on export concentrate shipments represents a separate performance obligation as defined under AASB 15 
Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This means a portion of the revenue earned under these contracts proportionate 
to the cost of freight services has been deferred and will be recognised at the time the obligation is fulfilled, that is, when the 
concentrate reaches its final destination. For the year ended 30 June 2023, the amount of deferred revenue is $0.1 million 
(FY22: $3.6 million).

Other income

Fair value adjustment/remeasurement of financial assets and liabilities 

The financial assets and liabilities comprise:

 Š a financial asset measured at fair value through profit and loss related to an investment in the ordinary capital of Sky Metals 
Limited, an entity listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). The fair value adjustment was determined based on the 
quoted market price of Sky Metals Limited as at 30 June 2023; and

 Š a financial liability measured at amortised cost related to a third-party royalty payable on the gross revenue from the sale 

of gold concentrate from the Dargues Gold Mine. The remeasurement of the liability is based on changes to the applied gold 
price and foreign exchange rate, estimated future sales volumes and the discount rate. 

143 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

4. COST OF SALES AND OTHER EXPENSES 
—

NOTE

2023 
$’000

2022 
$’000

Cost of sales

Site production costs

Transport and refining

Royalty

Inventory movement

Depreciation and amortisation

Total cost of sales

Corporate administration expenses

Corporate administration expenses

Corporate depreciation

Total corporate administration expenses

Other expenses

(Gain)/Loss on disposal of fixed assets 

Unrealised foreign exchange loss/(gain)

Realised foreign exchange (gain)/loss

Project development costs

Exploration and evaluation expenditure written off

Fair value adjustment of financial assets 

Remeasurement of financial liabilities 

Total other expenses

Finance costs

Interest expense 

Interest on lease liabilities

Unwinding of discount on rehabilitation liabilities

Total finance costs

Impairment loss

Impairment loss recognised in property, plant & equipment 

Impairment loss recognised in mine properties

Impairment loss recognised in exploration

Total impairment loss

144 
—

248,514

26,987

9,377

14,724

299,602

103,398

403,000

14,116

732

14,848

31

(637)

600

717

-

387

1,271

2,369

3,489

556

2,816

6,861

1,637

3,796

15,413

251,961

27,207

12,056

(12,079)

279,145

137,221

416,366

13,966

595

14,561

(43)

915

(723)

-

33

-

1,104

1,286

 3,803 

 677 

2,754 

 7,234 

10,104

125,583

-

20,846

135,687

11

14

13

9

10

11

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

5. INCOME TAX 
—

The Group is a tax consolidated group at balance date. The major components of income tax expense for the years ended 30 
June 2023 and 2022 are:

5.1 INCOME TAX EXPENSE

Current income tax

Current tax on profits/(losses) for the year

Adjustments in respect of current income tax of previous year

Deferred tax:

Deferred tax movements for the year

Income tax expense / (benefit) reported in the statement of profit or loss 
and other comprehensive income

2023 
$’000

(20,822)

333

2022 
$’000

(8,960)

1,305

(1,163)

(24,695)

(21,652)

(32,350)

5.2 NUMERICAL RECONCILIATION OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE TO PRIMA FACIE TAX PAYABLE

Accounting (loss)/profit before income tax

Prima facie income tax expense/(benefit) @ 30% 

Tax effect of amounts which are not deductible/(taxable) in calculating 
taxable income

Non-assessable items

Prior year under provisions

Previously unrecognised temporary differences

Income tax expense / (benefit)

2023 
$’000

(73,873)

(22,162)

177

(118)

451

2022 
$’000

(114,038)

(34,211)

556

1,305

-

(21,652)

(32,350)

145 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

5. INCOME TAX (CONTINUED) 
—

5.3 DEFERRED TAX BALANCES

The net deferred tax asset of $8.5 million (FY22: liability $8.2 million), relates to the following:

Recognised deferred tax balances

Provisions

Mine properties

Inventories

2023 
$’000

19,323

6,687

(2,231)

2022 
$’000

 20,244

 1,437 

(1,852)

Exploration and evaluation expenditure

(15,092)

(20,478)

Other

Property, plant and equipment

Net deferred tax asset / (liability)

Opening deferred tax asset/ (liability)

Recognised in profit or loss

Recognised in equity

Prior year under provisions

Other

Closing deferred tax asset/ (liability)

3,922

(4,051)

8,558

8,244

1,163

(480)

(305)

(63)

8,558

 8,142 

 751 

8,244

(13,129)

24,695

1,666

(4,262)

(726)

8,244

5.4.  RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

Current income tax

Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be paid to or recovered 
from the taxation authorities based on the current period’s taxable income. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are 
those that are enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. Under the current tax laws, in particular the loss carry back 
provisions, we can claim the current tax in full from the ATO. The loss carry back rules provide that entities can choose to carry back 
tax losses incurred in the FY20 to FY23 years to offset taxable income in FY19 to FY22 income years, resulting in cash refund of taxes 
paid in those earlier years upon filing the income tax return, provided certain eligibility criteria are met. We consider Aurelia meets the 
eligibility criteria and is entitled to loss carry back offset of the entire income tax receivable of $21.2m.

Deferred tax

Deferred tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, the carry forward of unused tax credits and any unused 
tax losses. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the 
deductible temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilised, except:

 Š when the deferred tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or an asset or liability

 Š in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor 

taxable profit or loss, and

 Š in respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint 
arrangements, when the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the 
temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

146 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

5. INCOME TAX (CONTINUED) 
—

5.4.  RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT (CONTINUED)

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable 
that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be utilised. Unrecognised deferred tax assets 
are reassessed at each reporting date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profits will allow 
the deferred tax asset to be recovered. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in 
the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively 
enacted at the reporting date.

Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in the income statement. Deferred tax 
assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax 
liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

6. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 
—

Cash at banks

Short term deposits 

Cash and cash equivalents 

Recognition and measurement

2023 
$’000

38,575

371

38,946

2022 
$’000

76,323

371

76,694

Cash and short-term deposits in the balance sheet comprise cash at bank and on hand and short-term deposits classified as 
financial assets held at amortised cost.

Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates. Short-term deposits are made for varying periods 
of generally between one day and three months depending on the immediate cash requirements of the Group and earn interest 
at the respective short-term deposit rates.

Restricted cash

Restricted cash is shown as a non-current asset as it is not available for day-to-day operations and is therefore excluded from 
cash and cash equivalents. The Group has $56.8 million (FY22: $30.7 million) held as restricted cash by the existing banking 
syndicate providing the Guarantee Facility as part of the secured Syndicated Facilities Agreement (refer to Note 15 for further 
information). This cash is in the process of being returned.

147 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

7. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES 
—

Trade receivables*

GST receivable

Other receivables

2023 
$’000

5,446

1,948

283

7,677

2022 
$’000

10,220

3,143

4,737

18,100

Recognition and measurement

All of the above are non-interest bearing and generally receivable on 30-to-90-day terms. At balance date, no material amount 
of trade receivables was past due or impaired.

Trade receivables

Trade receivables (subject to provisional pricing), comprising base metal and gold concentrates, are initially recorded at the 
fair value of contracted sale proceeds expected to be received only when there has been a passing of control to the customer. 
Approximately 90-95% of the provisional invoice for concentrate sales (based on the provisional price) is received in cash when 
the goods are loaded onto the ship. 

The collectability of debtors is reviewed in line with a forward-looking expected credit loss (ECL) approach. The Group has 
adopted AASB 9’s simplified approach and calculates ECL’s based on lifetime expected credit losses, and takes into consideration 
any historical credit loss experience, adjusted for forward-looking factors specific to the debtors and the economic environment. 

Financial assets at amortised cost are subsequently measured using the effective interest rate (EIR) method and are subject 
to impairment. The Group’s financial assets at amortised cost include trade receivables (not subject to provisional pricing) and 
other receivables. 

Trade receivables (subject to provisional pricing) are exposed to future commodity price movements over the quotational period 
(QP) and are measured at fair value up until the date of settlement. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an 
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. These trade 
receivables are initially measured at the amount which the Group expects to be entitled, being the estimate of the price expected 
to be received at the end of the QP. The QP is typically for between one- and four-months post-shipment, and final payment is 
due within 90 days from the end of the QP.

* The Group has $3.3m (FY22: $6.3m) in receivables in the Statement of Financial Position that are valued at fair value and 
represent provisional and advance sales invoices. These are disclosed in note 22.5.6 under the Fair value hierarchy. 

Other receivables 

Other receivables have arisen due to security deposits and employee receivables, and interest accrued on term deposits. 

148 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

8. INVENTORIES 
—

Finished concentrate

Finished gold doré

Metal in circuit

Ore stockpiles 

Materials and supplies

Total current inventory

Recognition and measurement

2023 
$’000

14,476

-

2,201

1,950

10,603

29,230

2022 
$’000

26,266

658

1,741

4,686

10,557

43,908

Materials and supplies are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Net realisable value is the estimate selling price in 
the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of completion and selling expenses. An allowance for obsolescence is 
determined with reference to the stores inventory items identified. A regular review is undertaken to determine the extent of any 
provision for obsolescence.

Ore stockpiles, gold in circuit, doré and concentrate are physically measured (or estimated) and valued at the lower of cost and 
net realisable value. Cost represents the weighted average cost and includes direct costs and an appropriate portion of fixed 
and variable production overhead expenditure, including depreciation and amortisation, incurred in converting materials into 
finished goods. 

Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and 
estimated costs necessary to make the sale.

As at 30 June 2023, of the total current inventory value $29.2m this includes stock valued at NRV of $10.6m (FY22 $18.7m).

Key judgements - net realisable value

The computation of net realisable value for ore stockpiles, gold in circuit, doré and concentrate involves significant 
judgements and estimates in relation to timing and cost of processing, commodity prices, foreign exchange rates, 
recoveries and the timing of sale of the doré and concentrate produced. A change in any of these assumptions will alter the 
estimated net realisable value and may therefore impact the carrying value of ore stockpiles. Separately identifiable costs 
of conversion of each metal are specifically allocated.

Stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of tonnes added and removed from the stockpile, the number 
of contained gold ounces is based on assay data, and the estimated recovery percentage is based on the expected 
processing method. 

149 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

9. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 
—

Plant and equipment at cost

Property and Land at cost

Accumulated depreciation

Impairment provision

Movement in property, plant and equipment

Carrying value at the beginning of the year

Acquisition of Dargues Gold Mine

Additions/expenditure during the year

Depreciation for the year

Impairment loss recognised during the year

Transfer to mine properties

Assets written off

Assets disposed or derecognised

Closing balance

Recognition and measurement

NOTE

4

10

2023 
$’000

278,735

7,224

2022 
$’000

281,681

5,417

(155,931)

(120,967)

(11,741)

118,287

156,027

-

10,958

(35,190)

(1,637)

(11,150)

(46)

(675)

(10,104)

 156,027

170,458

(4,593)

31,149

(30,564)

(10,104)

(262)

(55)

(2)

118,287

156,027

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation, amortisation and accumulated 
impairment losses. The initial cost of an asset comprises its purchase price or construction cost, any costs directly attributable 
to bringing the asset into operation, and, for qualifying assets (where relevant), borrowing costs. The purchase price or 
construction cost is the aggregate amount paid and the fair value of any other consideration given to acquire the asset.

Derecognition

Items of property, plant and equipment are derecognised upon disposal or when no further future economic benefits are 
expected from their use or disposal. Any gain or loss from derecognising the asset is included in the statement of profit or loss 
in the period the item is derecognised.

When an asset is surplus to requirements the carrying amount of the asset is reviewed and is written down to its recoverable 
amount or derecognised. 

Depreciation and amortisation

Items of plant and equipment and mine development are depreciated over their estimated useful lives.

The Group uses the units of production basis when depreciating mine specific assets which results in a depreciation charge 
proportional to the depletion of the anticipated remaining life of mine production. Each item’s economic life has due regard to 
both its physical life limitations and to present assessments of economically recoverable reserves of the mine property at which 
it is located.

For the remainder of assets, the straight-line method is used. The rates for the straight-line method vary between 10% 
and 33% per annum.

Property, plant and equipment are also subject to impairment indicators. Refer to note 10 for further information.

150 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

9. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT(CONTINUED) 
—

Key judgements - useful lives, residual values and depreciation methods

The process of estimating the remaining useful lives, residual values and depreciation methods involve significant judgement. 
These estimates are reviewed annually for all major items of plant and equipment. Any changes are accounted for prospectively 
from the date of reassessment to the end of the revised useful life. The Company uses the unit-of-production basis where 
depreciating/amortising specific assets which results in a depreciation/amortisation charge proportional to the depletion of the 
anticipated remaining life of mine production.

Each item’s economic life has due regard to both its physical life limitations and to present assessments of economically 
recoverable reserves of the mine property at which it is located. These calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions.

10. MINE PROPERTIES 
—

Mine properties at cost

Accumulated depreciation and impairment

Movement in mine properties 

Carrying value at the beginning of the year

Acquisition of Dargues Gold Mine

Impairment loss recognised during the year

Development expenditure during the year

Transfer from exploration and evaluation 

Depreciation for the year

Transfer from property, plant and equipment

Closing balance

Recognition and measurement

NOTE

4

11

9

2023 
$’000

694,532

(551,458)

143,074

123,533

-

(3,796)

15,122

57,620

2022 
$’000

610,640

(487,107)

123,533

287,035

4,680

(125,583)

53,752

139

(60,555)

(96,752)

11,150

143,074

262

123,533

The initial cost of an asset comprises its purchase price or construction cost, any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset 
into operation, the initial estimate of the rehabilitation obligation, and, for qualifying assets (where relevant), borrowing costs. 
The purchase price or construction cost is the aggregate amount paid and the fair value of any other consideration given 
to acquire the asset.

Mine properties also consist of the fair value attributable to mineral reserves and the portion of mineral resources considered 
to be probable of economic extraction at the time of an acquisition. 

When a mine construction project moves into the production phase, the capitalisation of certain mine construction costs ceases, 
and costs are either regarded as part of the cost of inventory or expensed, except for costs which qualify for capitalisation 
relating to mining asset additions, improvements or new developments, underground mine development or mineable 
reserve development.

151 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

10. MINE PROPERTIES (CONTINUED) 
—

Depreciation and amortisation

Accumulated mine development costs are depreciated/amortised on a unit-of-production basis over the economically 
recoverable reserves and the portion of mineral resources considered to be probable of economic extraction, except in the case 
of assets whose useful life is shorter than the life of the mine, in which case the straight-line method is applied.

The unit of account for run of mine (ROM) costs is Gold Metal Equivalent units mined (measured in ounces), whereas the unit of 
account for post-ROM costs is Gold Metal Equivalent units processed (measured in ounces).

Rights are depleted on the unit-of-production (UOP) basis over the economically recoverable reserves of the relevant area. 
The unit-of-production rate calculation for the depreciation/amortisation of mine development costs considers expenditures 
incurred to date, together with planned future mine development expenditure.

The estimated fair value attributable to the mineral reserves and the portion of mineral resources considered to be probable 
of economic extraction at the time of the acquisition is amortised on a UOP basis whereby the denominator is the proven 
and probable reserves and the portion of resources expected to be extracted economically. The estimated fair value of the 
mineral resources that are not considered to be probable of economic extraction at the time of the acquisition is not subject 
to amortisation, until the resource becomes probable of economic extraction in the future and is recognised in exploration and 
evaluation assets.

Assessment of impairment

At each balance date, the Group conducts an assessment for any indicators of impairment on each asset or 
Cash Generating Unit (CGU). The Group considers each of its mines to be a separate CGU. 

Assuming indicators of impairment are identified, the carrying value of the asset or CGU is compared with its recoverable 
amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of the CGU’s Fair Value Less Cost of Disposal (FVLCD) and Value In Use (VIU). 
The FVLCD for each CGU was determined based on the net present value of the future estimated cash flows (expressed in real 
terms) expected to be generated from the continued use of the CGUs (based on the most recent life of mine plans), including any 
expansion projects, and its eventual disposal, using assumptions a market participant may take into account. These cash flows 
are discounted using a real post-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the 
risks specific to the CGU.

If the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its receivable amounts, the carrying amount is reduced to the recoverable 
amount and an impairment loss is recognised in the Statement of Profit or Loss. 

The determination of FVLCD for each CGU are fair value measurements, as they are derived from valuation techniques that 
include inputs that are not based on observable market data. The Group considers the inputs and the valuation approach to be 
consistent with the approach taken by market participants.

At 30 June 2023, an impairment assessment was conducted, and it was noted that no indicators of impairment existed for 
any of the mine CGUs (30 June 22: impairment loss on Dargues CGU of $135.7 million). An Impairment expense of $5.4M was 
recognised at 31 December 2022 relating to the Hera mine as a result of the optimization of the life of mine with $3.8M allocated 
to mine properties and the remaining balance to property, plant and equipment. As impairment tests were performed for all mine 
CGUs at 30 June 2022 and 31 December 2022, although the carrying amount of the Group’s net assets was greater than the 
market capitalization at 30 June 2023, sufficient headroom was observed in these previous impairment calculations that would 
not have been eroded by any subsequent changes in commodity prices, interest rates or life of mine changes. 

152 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

10. MINE PROPERTIES (CONTINUED) 
—

Key judgements - depreciation and impairment assessment of mine properties

Units of production method of depreciation and amortisation

The Company uses the unit-of-production basis where depreciating/amortising specific assets which results in a depreciation/
amortisation charge proportional to the depletion of the anticipated remaining life of mine production.

Each item’s economic life, which is assessed annually, has due regard to both its physical life limitations and to present 
assessments of economically recoverable reserves of the mine property at which it is located. These calculations require the use 
of estimates and assumptions.

Impairment

The Company assesses each CGU, at each reporting period to determine whether there is any indication of impairment 
or reversal. Where an indicator of impairment or reversal exists, a formal estimate of the recoverable amount is made, 
which is deemed as being the higher of the fair value costs of disposal and VIU.

These assessments require the use of estimates and assumptions which could change over time and are impacted by various 
economic factors such as discount rates, exchange rates, commodity prices, gold multiple values, future operating development 
and sustaining capital requirements and operating performance. A change in one or more of these assumptions used to 
determine the value in use or fair value less costs of disposal could result in a material adjustment in a CGU's recoverable amount. 

153 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

11. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS 
—

NOTE

Exploration and evaluation assets

Movement in exploration and evaluation assets 

Balance at the beginning of the year

Expenditure during the year

Transfer to mine properties 

Impairment / Expenditure written off during the year

10

Closing balance

Recognition and measurement

2023 
$’000

9,667

71,728

10,972

(57,620)

(15,413)

9,667

2022 
$’000

71,728

39,318

32,582

(139)

(33)

71,728

Expenditure on acquisition, exploration and evaluation relating to an area of interest is carried forward where rights to tenure of 
the area of interest are current and:

 Š it is expected that expenditure will be recouped through successful development and exploitation of the area of interest or 

alternatively by its sale; and/or

 Š exploration and evaluation activities are continuing in an area of interest but at balance date have not yet reached a stage 

which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves.

Such expenditure consists of an accumulation of acquisition costs, direct exploration and evaluation costs incurred, together with 
an appropriate portion of directly related overhead expenditure. 

In the current year $5.3 million of the total expenditure related to the Federation project (FY22: $23.8 million}.

Impairment

A regular review is undertaken on each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs in 
relation to an area of interest. The carrying value of capitalised exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment 
when facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying value may exceed its recoverable amount. 

During the year, $15.4 million of impairment expense was recognised relating primarily to Dargues both near mine and surface 
drilling exploration ($13.5m) and Hera’s Athena tenement ($1m) for which there is not further prospects of an economically 
recoverable resource (FY22: $0 million).

Key judgements - impairment

The consolidated entity performs impairment testing on specific exploration assets when required in AASB 6 para 20. 
Significant judgement is applied during the review and assessment of the carried forward costs and the extent to which the 
costs are expected to the recouped through the successful future development of the area of interest.

154 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

12. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES  
—

Trade payables and accruals

Other payables

Recognition and measurement

2023 
$’000

21,516

6,963

28,479

2022 
$’000

59,423

6,347

65,770

Trade and other payables represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of the financial year 
that are unpaid.

Trade payables are unsecured, non-interest bearing and generally payable on 7 to 30-day terms. The carrying amounts of trade 
and other payables are considered to be the same as their fair values, due to their short-term nature. 

At 30 June 2023 the asset relating to mark to market adjustments for concentrate sales invoices not yet finalised is $nil. 
At 30 June 2022 the liability outstanding was $12 million.

No assets of the Group have been pledged as security for the trade and other payables.

155 
—

AURELIA METALS 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

13. PROVISIONS 
—

Current

Employee 

Mine rehabilitation

Deferred consideration

Other

Total current provisions

Non-Current

Employee

Mine rehabilitation

Deferred consideration

Total non-current provisions

2023 
$’000

2022 
$’000

6,486

501

-

737

7,566

1,813

1,532

1,019

7,724

11,930

423

77,741

-

78,164

407

87,163

386

87,956

Total provisions

85,888

99,886

EMPLOYEE 
$’000

MINE 
REHABILITATION  
$’000

DEFERRED 
CONSIDERATION 
$’000

7,973

4,167

-

-

(5,231)

6,909

 88,976 

(9,148)

(3,274)

2,106

(418)

78,242

OTHER 
$’000

TOTAL 
$’000

1,019 

 99,886 

2,242

(3,298)

-

-

(3,274)

2,139

 1,918 

(559)

-

33

(1,392)

(2,524)

(9,565)

-

737

85,888

EMPLOYEE 
$’000

MINE 
REHABILITATION  
$’000

DEFERRED 
CONSIDERATION 
$’000

OTHER 
$’000

TOTAL 
$’000

7,315

3,620

-

-

(2,962)

7,973

 74,412 

 2,018 

 121 

 83,866 

8,452

3,531

2,731

(150)

88,976

715

-

23

(838)

1,918

2,536

15,323

-

-

3,531

2,754

(1,638)

(5,588)

1,019

99,886

AT 30 JUNE 2023

Opening balance

Re-measurement of provision

Rehabilitation expense/(reversal)

Unwinding of discount 

Amounts paid/utilised during the year

Closing balance

AT 30 JUNE 2022

Opening balance

Re-measurement of provision

Rehabilitation expense/(reversal)

Unwinding of discount

Amounts paid/utilised during the year

Closing balance

156 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

13. PROVISIONS (CONTINUED) 
—

Employee benefits

The provision for employee benefits represents annual leave and long service leave entitlements for current employees. 

Mine rehabilitation

The nature of mine rehabilitation and site restoration costs includes the dismantling and removal of mining plant, equipment and 
building structures, waste removal and restoration, reclamation, and re-vegetation of affected areas of the site in accordance 
with the requirements of the mining permits.

At 30 June 2023, Letters of Credit totaling $56.8 million have been lodged (30 June 2022: $56.8 million).

The Company periodically engages environmental consultants to benchmark the rates used in estimating the mine rehabilitation 
provision. The change in the mine rehabilitation provision is due to the application of updated estimates, amounts recognised for 
future rehabilitation to our operating mine sites and land holdings, as well as amounts paid or utilised for rehabilitation activities 
undertaken during the reporting period.

Deferred consideration

This relates to deferred consideration on the purchase of Hera Mine. The Group records deferred consideration at fair value using 
the discounted cash flow methodology based on the two-year Australian government bond rate of 3.4% (FY22: 2.4%). This is 
now fully settled as of the date of this report.

Recognition and measurement

General

Provisions are recognised when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is 
probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable 
estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.

Where the Company expects some or all of a provision to be reimbursed, the reimbursement is recognised as a separate asset 
but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The expense relating to any provision is presented in the statement of 
profit or loss net of any reimbursement.

Employee benefits

Annual leave liabilities are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. Long service leave 
liabilities are measured at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows, discounted using a current pre-tax rate that 
reflects, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the 
passage of time is recognised as part of finance costs in the statement of profit or loss.

157 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

13. PROVISIONS (CONTINUED) 
—

Mine rehabilitation

The rehabilitation provision represents the present value of the estimated future rehabilitation costs relating to mine sites. 
The discount rate used to determine the present value is a pre-tax rate reflecting the current market assessment. The unwinding 
of the discounting of the provision is included in finance costs in the statement of profit or loss.

When the liability is initially recorded, the present value of the estimated cost is capitalised as part of the carrying value of mine 
properties, which is amortised on a units of production basis. Additional disturbances or changes in rehabilitation costs will be 
recognised as additions or changes to the corresponding asset and rehabilitation liability when incurred. In instances where 
there is no asset the changes are expensed in the profit or loss.

Deferred acquisition costs in relation to Hera

The Company measures the deferred consideration by reference to the fair value of net present value of future cash outflows. 
The following assumptions have been taken into account: risk free bond rate, gold price, timing and possibility of payment.

Key judgements – mine rehabilitation 

Mine rehabilitation

Significant estimates and assumptions are required in determining the provision for mine rehabilitation as there are many 
transactions and other factors that will affect the ultimate liability payable to rehabilitate the mine sites. Changes in 
technology, regulations, price increases, changes in timing of cash flows which are based on life of mine plan and changes 
in discount rates affect recognised value of the liability. These factors will impact the mine rehabilitation provision in the 
period in which they change or become known. 

158 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

14. LEASES 
—

The Company has lease contracts for mining, property, plant, machinery, and other equipment used in its operations. The leases 
generally have lease terms between 2 and 5 years. 

Set out below are the carrying amounts of right-of-use assets recognised and the movements during the period:

2023 
$’000

2022 
$’000

Right of use assets

Carrying value at the beginning of the year

Additions

Re-measurement / Modifications

Terminations

Depreciation expense

Carrying value at the end of the year

Set out below are the carrying amounts of lease liabilities and the movements during the period:

Lease liabilities

Current

Non-current

Closing balance 

Movement in lease liabilities

Carrying value at the beginning of the year

Additions

Re-measurement

Terminations

Interest expense

Payments

Carrying value at the end of the year

19,414

3,695

(5,762)

(4,528)

(7,876)

4,943

2023 
$’000

3,041

1,969

5,010

19,489

3,695

(5,762)

(3,037)

557

(9,932)

5,010

12,674

17,244

-

-

(10,504)

19,414

2022 
$’000

11,065

8,424

19,489

12,967

17,248

-

-

677

(11,403)

19,489

The additions for the year include lease renewals amounting to $3.7 million made in June 2023 (FY22: $7.2million).

159 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

14. LEASES (CONTINUED) 
—

The following are the amounts recognised in profit or loss

Depreciation expense for right-of-use assets

Interest expense on lease liabilities

Expense relating to short term leases and low value assets (included in cost 
of sales) 

Recognition and measurement 

Right of use assets 

2023 
$’000

7,876

557

-

2022 
$’000

 10,504 

 677 

-

8,433

11,181

The Group recognises right-of-use assets at the commencement date of the lease (i.e., the date the underlying asset is available 
for use). Right-of-use assets are measured at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, and adjusted 
for any remeasurement of lease liabilities. The cost of right-of-use assets includes the amount of lease liabilities recognised, 
initial direct costs incurred, and lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any lease incentives received. 
Right-of-use assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of its estimated useful life and the lease term. 
The depreciation for the mine site is disclosed under cost of sales whereas depreciation for the Corporate site is included in 
corporate administration expenses. Right-of-use assets are subject to impairment.

Lease Liabilities

At the commencement date of the lease, the Group recognises lease liabilities measured at the present value of lease payments 
to be made over the lease term. The lease payments include fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments) less any 
lease incentives receivable, variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, and amounts expected to be paid under 
residual value guarantees. 

The variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or a rate are recognised as expense in the period on which the event 
or condition that triggers the payment occurs. The lease interest expense is disclosed as finance costs in the statement of profit 
or loss and is included as part of interest paid under cash flows from operating activities in the Cash Flow Statement.

In calculating the present value of lease payments, the Group uses the incremental borrowing rate at the lease commencement 
date if the interest rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable. After the commencement date, the amount of lease 
liabilities is increased to reflect the accretion of interest and reduced for the lease payments made.

In addition, the carrying amount of lease liabilities is remeasured if there is a modification, a change in the lease term, a change 
in the in-substance fixed lease payments or a change in the assessment to purchase the underlying asset.

160 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

14. LEASES (CONTINUED) 
—

Short-term leases and leases of low-value assets

The Group applies the short-term lease recognition exemption to its short-term leases of machinery and equipment (i.e., those 
leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less from the commencement date and do not contain a purchase option). It also 
applies the lease of low-value assets recognition exemption to leases of office equipment that are considered of low value 
(i.e., below $5,000). 

Lease payments on short-term leases and leases of low-value assets are recognised as expense on a straight- line basis over the 
lease term.

Key judgements – Estimating incremental borrowing rate, identification of non-lease components and in 
substance fixed rates 

The Group cannot readily determine the interest rate implicit in its leases. Therefore, it uses the relevant incremental 
borrowing rate (IBR) to measure lease liabilities. The IBR is the rate of interest that the Group would have to pay to borrow 
over a similar term, and with a similar security, the funds necessary to obtain an asset of a similar value to the right-of-use 
asset in a similar economic environment. The Group estimates the IBR using observable inputs (such as market interest 
rates) when available and entity-specific judgements estimates (such as the lease term and certain contract provisions).

In addition to containing a lease, some of the Group’s arrangement involves the provision of additional services. These are 
non-lease components, and the Group has elected to separate these from the lease components. Judgement is required 
to identify each of the lease and non-lease components. The consideration in the contract is then allocated between the 
lease and non-lease components on a relative stand-alone price basis. The Group also applies judgement to determine 
in-substance fixed payments included in the lease payments such as unavoidable fixed minimum amounts.

15. INTEREST BEARING LOANS AND BORROWINGS 
—

EFFECTIVE 
INTEREST RATE %

MATURITY

2023 
$’000

2022 
$’000

Current

Term loan facility

Less: Borrowing costs paid

BBSY +4

30-Sept-2023

Other loans

3-7%

31-May-2026

Total current loans and borrowings 

Non-current

Term loan facility

Less: Borrowing costs paid

BBSY +4

30-Sept-2023

Other loans

3-7%

31-May-2026

Total non-current loans and borrowings

Total interest-bearing liabilities

-

-

-

3,635

3,635

-

-

-

4,047

4,047

7,682

16,200

(1,142)

15,058

2,352

17,410

4,500

(288)

4,212

4,379

8,591

26,001

161 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

15. INTEREST BEARING LOANS AND BORROWINGS (CONTINUED) 
—

Syndicated Facilities

At 30 June 2023 the Group had a secured Syndicated Facilities Agreement with a syndicate of banks comprising ANZ, NAB and 
BNP Paribas. During the Financial Year the term loan was fully repaid and security held over the Groups assets was released. 
A Guarantee Facility remains in place with $56.8 million drawn for environmental rehabilitation bonds, which is fully backed by 
$56.8 million in cash held by the banks (FY22: $30.7 million). Restricted cash is shown as a non-current asset as it is not available 
for day-to-day operations.

Trafigura Pte Ltd

On 31 May 2023 a new financing facility was announced with Trafigura Pte Ltd. The new Trafigura facilities (the “Facilities”) 
comprise:

 Š US$24 million (A$36.4 million) Loan Note Advance (“Loan Note”) facility to contribute funding to construction of Federation, 

and 

 Š A$65 million Environmental Bond Facility (“Bond Facility”) to provide rehabilitation bonding.

The Facilities have a term of 4 years from the date of financial close. No debt has been recognised at 30 June. The Loan Note 
has an interest rate of SOFR (Secured Overnight Financing Rate) + 6.0% and the Bond Facility has an interest rate of 6.0%. 
The Facilities have no financial covenants, no hedging requirements and have early repayment flexibility.

In June 2023 the existing secured Syndicated Facilities Agreement was repaid in full and the existing performance bond 
facility was fully cash backed. Total cash backing at 30 June 2023 was $56.8 million, with the full amount in the process of 
being returned. 

Other loans

The Group has entered into loan agreements to fund the acquisition of mobile plant and equipment. The loans are repayable by 
May 2026 with applicable interest rates ranging from 3% to 7%. The financed equipment is security for the loans. 

Recognition and measurement 

At initial recognition, interest bearing loans and borrowings are classified as financial liabilities measured at fair value net of 
directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent measurement is at amortised cost. Any difference between the proceeds 
(net of transaction costs) and the redemption amount is recognised in profit or loss over the period of the borrowings using 
the effective interest method.

Establishment fees related to the facilities are capitalised as a prepayment and amortised over the term of the facility to which 
it relates.

162 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

16. OTHER FINANCIAL LIABILITIES  
—

Current

Third party royalty liability 

Non-Current

Third party royalty liability 

NOTE

2023 
$’000

2022 
$’000

6,803

6,803

713

713

6,947

6,947

4,128

4,128

 Total other financial liability

7,516

11,075

Movement in carrying value of other financial liabilities

Third Party Royalty Liability 

Carrying value at the beginning of the year

Payments during the year 

Remeasurement 

Closing balance 

Contingent consideration liability

Carrying value at the beginning of the year

FV adjustment through profit & loss

Closing balance

NOTE

3, 4

3

2023 
$’000

11,075

(4,830)

1,271

7,516

-

-

-

2022 
$’000

39,165

(5,209)

(22,881)

11,075

4,250

(4,250)

-

16.1 THIRD PARTY ROYALTY LIABILITY

On 21 December 2018, a funding agreement with Triple Flag (TFM) was executed, where TFM agreed to fund the Dargues Gold 
Project in consideration for the grant of a royalty. Following the acquisition of Dargues Gold Mine on 17th December 2020, as a 
going concern, Aurelia assumed the obligations related to the royalty due to the continuing obligation provisions of the royalty 
deed. The royalty is calculated on the gross revenue generated from the sale of gold concentrate from the Dargues Gold Mine 
and is payable in United States Dollars (USD).

The liability is measured at amortised cost. The value is determined by discounting the future royalty payments using a discount 
rate of 3.33% and the impact of the periodic remeasurement of the following assumptions:

 Š gold price;

 Š life of mine extension and related change in sales volumes; and

 Š foreign exchange rate.

The estimated sales volume for the remaining life of the mine has reduced due to the reassessed shorter mine life of the mine 
site during the current financial year which has resulted in a lower royalty liability as at 30 June 2023.

163 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

16. OTHER FINANCIAL LIABILITIES (CONTINUED) 
—

16.1 THIRD PARTY ROYALTY LIABILITY (CONTINUED)

Recognition and measurement

At initial recognition the third-party royalty liabilities are classified as financial liabilities measured at fair value net of directly 
attributable transaction costs. Subsequent measurement is at amortised cost. Any difference between the proceeds (net of 
transaction costs) and the redemption amount is recognised in profit or loss over the period of the liability using the effective 
interest method.

17. CONTRIBUTED EQUITY  
—

17.1 MOVEMENTS IN ORDINARY SHARES ON ISSUE 

30 JUNE 2023

Opening balance

Shares issued on vesting of performance rights

Institutional Component of Equity Raising

Share Issue Costs

Employee Share Scheme

Closing balance

30 JUNE 2022

Opening balance

Shares issued on vesting of performance rights

Employee Share Scheme

Shares issued on vesting of performance rights

Closing balance

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

NOTES

DATE

NUMBER

$’000

(iv)

(v)

(v)

(vi)

1,237,056,457

334,659

31-Aug-22

380,759

-

9-June-23

261,818,451

23,564

9-June-23

-

(1,205)

13-June-23

2,687,328

-

1,501,942,995

357,018

NOTES

DATE

NUMBER

$’000

1,234,739,875

334,659

7-Sept-21

4-Nov-21

76,993

674,388

30-Nov-21

1,565,201

-

-

-

1,237,056,457

334,659

(i)  On 7 September 2021, the Company issued 76,993 shares on the vesting of Performance Rights.

(ii)  On 4 November 2021, a total of 674,388 shares were issued under the Employee Share Scheme for no consideration, (refer to note 21.2 

for further detail). 

(iii)  Shares issued upon the vesting of 1,565,201 Performance Rights for no consideration. 

(iv)  On 31 August 2022, the Company issued 380,759 shares on the vesting of Performance Rights.

(v)  On 9 June 2023, the Company completed the institutional placement and entitlement offer component of the A$40 million equity raising announced 

on 31 May 2023. The shares were issued at $0.09 per share.

(vi)  On 13 June 2023, a total of 2,687,328 shares were issued under the Employee Share Scheme for no consideration, (refer to note 21.2 for further detail). 

164 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

17. CONTRIBUTED EQUITY (CONTINUED) 
—

17.1 MOVEMENTS IN ORDINARY SHARES ON ISSUE (CONTINUED)

Recognition and measurement

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown 
directly in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from proceeds.

Ordinary shares which have no par value have the right to receive dividends as declared and, in the event of a winding up of 
the Parent, to participate in the proceeds from sale of all surplus assets in proportion to the number of and amounts paid up on 
shares held. Ordinary shares entitle their holder to one vote, either in person or proxy, at a meeting of the Company.

17.2 DIVIDENDS MADE AND PROPOSED

Dividend paid

Total

2023 
$’000

-

-

2022 
$’000

-

-

The Directors did not recommend the payment of a dividend for the financial year ended 30 June 2022 and 30 June 2023.

The franking account balance at the end of the financial year is $32.2 million (FY22: $41.9 million). 

The Company currently does not have a share buy-back plan or a dividend reinvestment plan. 

18. RESERVES 
—

Share based payment reserve

Movements in reserves

Movement in share base payments reserve

Opening balance

Share based payment expense

Closing balance

2023 
$’000

13,919

13,919

2023 
$’000

13,122

797

13,919

2022 
$’000

13,122

13,122

2022 
$’000

11,342

1,780

13,122

165 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

18. RESERVES (CONTINUED) 
—

OCI items net of tax: 
Cash flow hedge reserve

Opening balance

Commodity forwards closed through P&L 

Closing balance

Recognition and measurement

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments 

2023 
$’000

(1,964)

1,964  

-

2022 
$’000

2,492

 (4,456)

(1,964)

Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered, and they are subsequently 
remeasured to their fair value at the end of each reporting period. 

The group designates derivatives as either:

 Š hedges of the fair value of recognised assets or liabilities or a firm commitment (fair value hedges); or

 Š hedges of a particular risk associated with the cash flows of recognised assets and liabilities and highly probable forecast 

transactions (cash flow hedges).

Hedge accounting

At inception of the hedge relationship, the group documents the economic relationship between hedging instruments and 
hedged items including whether changes in the cash flows of the hedging instruments are expected to offset changes in the cash 
flows of hedged items. The group documents its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking its hedge transactions 
(refer to note 22.1 and 22.5.2 for further detail). 

Hedge effectiveness

The effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognised in OCI in the cash flow hedge reserve, whilst 
any ineffective portion is recognised immediately in profit and loss. The cash flow hedge reserve is adjusted to the lower of the 
cumulative gain or loss on the hedging instrument and the cumulative change in fair value of the hedged item. The accumulated 
gains and losses recorded in the hedge reserve are reclassified to the profit and loss in the same period during which the hedged 
expected future cash flows from the underlying revenue transaction are recognized in the profit and loss. Amounts included in 
the hedge reserve are released to profit and loss when the hedge contracts are closed, and revenue has been recognised in the 
profit and loss. 

Movement in reserves

The Company provides benefits to employees in the form of share-based payment transactions, whereby employees render 
services in exchange for shares or rights over shares (“equity-settled transactions”), as issued under the Company’s employee 
Performance Rights Plan. The plan forms part of the Company’s remuneration framework, as detailed and explained in the 
Remuneration Report to these Financial Statements. 

The Company also has an Employee Share Scheme, where eligible employees are invited to participate in the plan to receive 
fully paid ordinary shares in the Company (subject to dealing restrictions ending on the earlier of 3 years after grant or when the 
employee ceases employment) with a nominal value of $1,000.

166 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

19. RETAINED EARNINGS  
—

Movements in retained earnings were as follows:

Opening balance

Profit/(loss) after tax for the year

Dividend paid

Closing balance

20. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS) 
—

(Loss)/Profit attributable to owners of Aurelia Limited used to calculate 
basic and diluted earnings

Weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the denominator in 
calculating basic earnings per share

Weighted average number of ordinary shares and potential ordinary shares 
used as the denominator in calculating diluted earnings per share

Basic earnings per share (cents per share)

Diluted earnings per share (cents per share)

Basic earnings per share 

2023 
$’000

2022 
$’000

(8,891)

(52,221)

-

72,797

(81,688)

-

(61,112)

(8,891)

2023 
$’000

2022 
$’000

(52,221)

(81,688)

1,254,006

1,236,163

1,270,513

1,250,600

(4.16)

(4.16)

(6.61)

(6.61)

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net profit for the year attributable to equity holders of the Parent Company, 
by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year.

Diluted earnings per share 

Earnings used to calculate diluted earnings per share are calculated by adjusting the amount used in determining basic earnings 
per share by the after-tax effect of dividends and interest associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares. The weighted 
average number of shares used is adjusted for the weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no 
consideration in relation to dilutive potential ordinary shares.

The effect of dilution has not been incorporated in calculating the diluted earnings per share as the effect is non anti-dilutive.

167 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

21. SHARE BASED PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS 
—

Share based payments expense

Expense from employee performance rights plan

Expense from employee share plan

Total

2023 
$’000

2022 
$’000

509

288

797

1,518

262

1,780

21.1 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE RIGHTS PLAN

The Company has an employee Performance Rights Plan. The objective of the plan is to assist in the recruitment, reward, 
retention, and motivation of employees of Aurelia. The plan is open to eligible executives and employees.

The plan is provided by way of allocation of Performance Rights which carry an entitlement to a share subject to satisfaction 
of performance criteria and/or vesting conditions (as applicable). To the extent performance criteria and/or vesting conditions 
are satisfied, the Performance Rights are taken to have vested and been exercised for no consideration. The number of ordinary 
shares issued is equal to the number of vested Performance Rights issued. 

Performance Rights are generally granted each year. The performance hurdles are agreed prior to the commencement of a new 
financial year. The hurdles are determined at the discretion of the Board. The test date for each issue of Performance Rights is 
typically three years from the Grant Date.   

21.2 EMPLOYEE SHARE PLAN

The Company has an Employee Share Plan, which provides eligible employees with an opportunity to acquire ordinary shares 
in the Company, with a grant value of $1,000. In FY23, the plan provided each eligible employee with 9,331 fully paid ordinary 
shares. (FY22: 2,574 shares).

21.3 SUMMARY OF MOVEMENTS OF PERFORMANCE RIGHTS ON ISSUE

The following table illustrates the number of, and movements in Performance Rights during the year. All Performance Rights 
have a zero weighted average exercise price.

Refer to the Remuneration Report (section 7.2) for the vesting conditions of the performance rights issued during the year.

Performance rights on issue

Opening balance issued

Granted during the year

Vested during the year

Lapsed during the year

Closing balance issued

2023 
NUMBER

2023 
WAEP

2022 
NUMBER

2022 
WAEP

16,004,375

11,575,382

(838,634)

(11,311,535)

15,429,588

-

-

-

-

-

10,523,362

8,607,704

(1,642,193)

(1,484,498)

16,004,375

-

-

-

-

-

168 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

21. SHARE BASED PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS (CONTINUED) 
—

21.3 SUMMARY OF MOVEMENTS OF PERFORMANCE RIGHTS ON ISSUE (CONTINUED)

Performance Rights

Class 19A 

Class 19C 

Class FY21

Class FY22

Class FY23

Total

2023 
NUMBER

2022 
NUMBER

-

-

-

2,284,641

-

Vested

Vested

5,452,474

Unvested

4,859,852

8,267,260

Unvested

10,569,736

-

Unvested

15,429,588

16,004,375

Subsequent to the balance sheet date, the LTIP outcomes for Performance Rights under Class FY21 were determined. 
There were also changes to Class FY22 and FY23 Performance Rights following staff movement.

21.4 FAIR VALUE DETERMINATION

During the year, the Company issued a total of 11,575,382 performance rights (FY22: 8,607,704 rights) under its employee 
Performance Rights plan. 

Each grant under the employee Performance Rights plan will have a fair value calculated under the accounting standards, which 
is calculated as at the date of grant. An independent expert provider is engaged to calculate the estimated fair value of each 
grant using the Monte Carlo simulation method, which is applied in conjunction with assumed probabilities for the achievement 
of specific performance hurdles as define for each grant.

21.5 RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT

The Company provides benefits to employees in the form of share-based payment transactions, whereby employees render 
services in exchange for shares or rights over shares (‘equity-settled transactions’).

The cost of these equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which they 
are granted. The fair value is determined by an external independent valuation using the Monte Carlo simulation.

The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in which 
the performance conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award 
(‘vesting date’).

The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until vesting date reflects:

 Š the extent to which the vesting period has expired; and

 Š the number of awards that will ultimately vest.

This opinion is formed based on the best available information at balance date. No expense is recognised for awards that do not 
ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market condition.

In limited circumstances where the terms of an equity-settled award are modified (such as a change of control event, or as part of an 
agreed termination benefit), a minimum expense is recognised as if the terms had not been modified. The expense recognised reflects 
any increase in the value of the transaction as a result of the modification, as measured at the date of modification.

169 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

21. SHARE BASED PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS (CONTINUED) 
—

21.5 RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT (CONTINUED)

Where an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not 
yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award and 
designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new award are treated as if they were a 
modification of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.

The dilutive effect, if any, of the outstanding Performance Rights is reflected as additional share dilution in the computation 
of earnings per share unless when the effect is anti-dilutive.

22. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES  
—

In common with all other businesses, the Company is exposed to risks that arise during the course of business and its use of 
financial instruments. This note describes the consolidated entity’s objectives, policies, and processes for managing those risks 
and the methods used to measure them. Further quantitative information in respect of these risks is presented throughout these 
financial statements.

The Company’s financial instruments consists of: deposits with banks, trade and other receivables, listed equity investments, 
derivatives, loans and borrowings, trade and other payables, royalty liabilities, lease liabilities and the deferred consideration 
related to the acquisition of the Hera Mine and the Dargues Gold Mine. 

The Board has overall responsibility for the determination of the Company’s risk management objectives and policies, and whilst 
retaining ultimate responsibility for them, it has delegated the authority for designing and operating processes that ensure the 
effective implementation of the objectives and policies to the Company’s managerial team. 

The Company’s risk management policies and practices are designed to minimise and reduce risk as far as possible and to 
ensure cash flows are sufficient to:

 Š withstand significant changes in cash flow at risk scenarios and still meet all financial commitments as and when they fall due; and

 Š maintain the capacity to fund project development, exploration, and acquisition strategies. 

170 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

22. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 
(CONTINUED)  
—

The Group holds the following financial instruments:

Financial assets

Cash at bank

Trade and other receivables

Restricted cash

Listed equity investments

Derivative financial instruments

Balance at year end

Financial liabilities

Interest bearing loans and borrowings 

Trade and other payables

Third party royalty liability 

Lease liabilities

Deferred consideration

Derivative financial instruments 

Balance at year end

Financial assets and liabilities

NOTES

6

7

6

22

15

12

16

14

13

22

2023 
$’000

38,946

7,677

56,833

718

69

2022 
$’000

76,694

18,100

30,746

1,105

-

104,243

126,645

7,682

28,479

7,516

5,010

-

-

26,001

65,770

11,075

19,489

1,918

 3,103 

48,687

 127,356 

The Group enters derivative financial instruments (commodity contracts) with financial institutions with investment-grade 
credit ratings. It measures financial instruments, such as derivatives and provisionally priced trade receivables, at fair value at 
each reporting date.

The Group’s principal financial assets, other than derivatives and provisionally priced trade receivables, comprise other 
receivables, cash and short-term deposits that arise directly from its operations, as well as investments. The Group’s principal 
financial liabilities other than derivatives comprise interest bearing loans and borrowings, trade and other payables, lease 
liabilities, third party royalty and deferred consideration royalty.

Accounting policies in respect of these financial assets and liabilities are documented within the relevant notes to the 
consolidated financial statements.

Offsetting of financial instruments

Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset, and the net amount is reported in the consolidated statement of financial 
position if there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net 
basis, to realise the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments 

The Group is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed using derivative 
instruments are foreign currency risk and commodity price risk. 

171 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

22. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES  
(CONTINUED) 
—

22.1 CASH FLOW HEDGES – COMMODITY PRICE RISK

The Group sells gold doré and gold and base metal concentrate to customers. Due to volatility in commodity markets, hedging 
has been used to manage price risks. In addition to this, the existing syndicated loan facility included mandatory gold hedging 
of a minimum of 20% of the Group’s gold production in each 12-month period. At 30 June 2023, the Company had no existing 
hedge commitment (FY22: 21,023 oz of gold). 

There is an economic relationship between the hedged items and the hedging instruments. The Group tests hedge 
effectiveness periodically.

The hedge ineffectiveness can arise from:

 Š differences in the timing of the cash flows of the hedged items and the hedging instrument; and

 Š Changes to the forecasted amount of cash flows of hedged items and hedging instrument.

The Group had no gold forward contract commitments at 30 June 2023:

30 JUNE 2023

Average Contract price (AUD/oz)

Ounces 

TOTAL 

LESS THAN 
1 MONTH

1 TO 3 
MONTHS

3 TO 6 
MONTHS

6 TO 9 
MONTHS 

9 TO 12 
MONTHS 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

30 JUNE 2022

TOTAL 

LESS THAN 
1 MONTH

1 TO 3 
MONTHS

3 TO 6 
MONTHS

6 TO 9 
MONTHS 

9 TO 12 
MONTHS 

Average Contract price (AUD/oz)

 2,371 

 2,359 

 2,435 

 2,596 

 2,685 

Ounces 

21,023

1,600

3,850

6,148

5,366

4,059

22.2  LIQUIDITY RISK

Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that the group might encounter difficulty in settling its debts or otherwise meeting its 
obligations related to financial liabilities.

At 30 June 2023, the Company had fully repaid the term loan under the existing Syndicated Facility (FY22: $20.7 million) and 
holds $38.9 million (FY22: $76.7 million) of available cash.

172 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

22. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES  
(CONTINUED) 
—

22.3  MATURITY OF FINANCIAL LIABILITIES

The tables below analyses the Group’s financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on their contractual maturities.

The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows. Balances which are due within 12 months equal 
their carrying balances as the impact of discounting is not significant.

2023

<1 YR 
$'000

1-2 YRS 
$'000

2-3 YRS 
$'000

3-4 YRS 
$'000

>4 YRS 
$'000

CONTRACTED CASH 
FLOW OF LIABILITY $'000

CARRYING VALUE  
OF LIABILITY $'000

Loans and borrowings 

-

-

Equipment loans

3,635

3,173

Lease liabilities

3,040

1,883

Deferred consideration

-

Trade and other payables 

28,479

-

-

Third party royalty liability

6,803

713

Derivative financial 
instruments

(69)

-

-

874

86

-

-

-

-

Total

41,888

5,769

960

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

8,244

5,539

-

28,479

7,675

(69)

49,868

-

7,682

5,010

-

28,479

7,516

(69)

48,618

There are no contracted cash flow liabilities relating to leases payable in period greater 5 years.

2022

<1 YR 
$'000

1-2 YRS 
$'000

2-3 YRS 
$'000

3-4 YRS 
$'000

>4 YRS 
$'000

CONTRACTED CASH FLOW 
OF LIABILITY $'000

CARRYING VALUE  
OF LIABILITY $'000

Loans and borrowings 

 16,200

 4,500 

 - 

Equipment loans

2,352

2,465

1,951

Lease liabilities

 11,070

 7,995

Deferred consideration

 1,225

 614

 427

 108

Trade and other payables 

 65,770

 -  

 -  

Third party royalty 
liability 

Derivative financial 
instruments

 1,492 

 5,573

 4,307

3,103

-

-

Total

101,212 

21,146

6,793

 -  

-

 4 

 -  

 -  

 - 

-

 4 

 -  

-

 -  

 -  

 -  

 - 

-

 - 

 20,700 

6,768

 19,496

 1,947

 65,770 

 11,372 

 19,270

6,731

 19,489

 1,918

 65,770

 11,075

3,103

3,103

 129,156

 127,356

22.4 Credit risk exposures

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual 
obligations and arises principally from the Group’s receivables from customers and investment securities. Although the Group has a 
concentrated customer base, they have continuously met their contractual obligations. On this basis, at balance date, there were no 
significant concentrations of credit risk. The Group also limits its counterparty credit risk on investments by using banks with investment 
grade credit ratings.

The total trade and other receivables outstanding as at 30 June 2023 was $7.6 million (FY22: $18.1 million). 

No receivables are considered past due or impaired. Cash and cash equivalents at 30 June 2023 was $38.9 million (FY22: $76.7 million). 

173 
—

AURELIA METALS 
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

22. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES  
(CONTINUED) 
—

22.5 MARKET RISK EXPOSURES

22.5.1 Foreign currency risk

Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of an exposure will fluctuate because of changes in foreign 
exchange rates. The Group’s exposure to the risk of changes in foreign exchange rates relates primarily to the Group’s operating 
activities, including revenue and expenses denominated in a foreign currency.

The group considers the effects of foreign currency risk on its financial position and financial performance and assesses its 
option to hedge based on current economic conditions and available market data.

The Group manages its foreign currency risk by converting foreign currency receipts to AUD upon receipt and only maintaining a 
minimal USD balance for foreign currency denominated commitments. 

The table below demonstrates the sensitivity of revenue not converted at the time of sale to a change in the US$ exchange rate 
with all other variables held constant:

EFFECT ON PROFIT BEFORE TAX

Increase/(decrease) in foreign exchange rate

+5%

-5%

2023 
$’000

(2,449)

2,423

2022 
$’000

(3,756)

3,717

The cash balance at year end includes US$1.0 million (FY22: US$3.9 million) held in US$ bank accounts. 

The table below demonstrates the sensitivity of the US$ denominated bank account balances to a change in the US$ exchange 
rate with all other variables held constant:

EFFECT ON THE BANK BALANCES

Increase/(decrease) in AUD: USD foreign exchange rate

+5%

-5%

22.5.2 Commodity price risk

2023 
$’000

(70)

77

2022 
$’000

(269)

297

The Group is affected by the price volatility of certain commodities. Price risk relates to the risk that the fair value of future 
cash flows of commodity sales will fluctuate because of changes in market prices largely due to supply and demand factors 
for commodities. The Group is exposed to commodity price risk related to the sale of gold, lead, zinc, and copper on physical 
prices determined by the market at the time of sale.

Commodity price risk may be managed, from time to time and as required and deemed appropriate by the Board, with the use 
of hedging strategies through the purchase of commodity hedge contracts. These contracts can establish a minimum commodity 
price denominated in either US dollars or Australian dollars over part of the group’s future metal production. With trade 
receivables measured at fair value, the risk is that the final QP price achieved would be lower than the carrying value of the 
receivables which was based at the forward QP price at the reporting date.  

The Group’s management has developed and enacted a hedging policy focused on the management of commodity risk. 
The management of this risk includes an element of mandatory hedging previously required under the secured Syndicated 
Facilities Agreement, as well as Quotation Period hedging for metal in concentrates sold. 

The Group had no commodity price hedging in place at 30 June 2023 (30 June 2022: 21,023 ounces with an average price 
of $2,505/oz).

174 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

22. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES  
(CONTINUED) 
—

22.5 MARKET RISK EXPOSURES (CONTINUED)

22.5.2 Commodity price risk (continued)

The Quotation Period hedging in place for concentrates sold at the end of the reporting period is summarised below:

COMMODITY

UNIT

QUANTITY

CONTRACT PRICE

QUANTITY

CONTRACT PRICE

30 JUNE 2023

30 JUNE 2022

Gold

Copper

Lead

Zinc

oz

t

t

t

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

3,274

570

1,585

400

US$1,841

US$9,860

US$2,225

US$4,018

During the financial year, gold and gold in concentrate unhedged sales were 29,812 ounces (FY22: 9,249 ounces). The effect 
on the income statement with an A$50/oz increase/decrease in gold price would have resulted in an increase/decrease in 
profit/loss and equity of $1.5 million (FY22: $0.5 million).

During the financial year, the Company made unhedged sales of concentrate containing payable lead of 6,276 tonnes (FY22: 
4,831 tonnes), payable zinc 3,618 tonnes (FY22: 12,394 tonnes) and payable copper of 285 tonnes (FY22: 1,176 tonnes). 
An increase/decrease of US$50/t in the price of lead, zinc and copper would have resulted in an increase/decrease profit/loss 
and equity by $0.8 million (FY22: $1.3 million).

22.5.3 Interest rate risk

Exposure to interest rate risk arises on financial assets and liabilities recognised at reporting date where a future change in 
interest rates will affect future cash flows or the fair value of fixed rate financial instruments. The Group’s exposure to the risk of 
changes in market interest rates primarily relates to the Group’s cash and the Term Loan that have floating interest rates.

An increase/(decrease) in interest rates on the average debt borrowing balance by 50 basis points will result in a $0.1 million 
(FY22: $0.1 million) (decrease)/ increase in the profit or loss and equity.

The Group continually analyses its exposure to interest rate risk. Consideration is given to alternative financing options, potential 
renewal of existing positions, alternative investments, and the mix of fixed and variable interest rates.

22.5.4 Equity price risk

The Group’s listed equity investment in Sky Metals Limited is susceptible to market price risk arising from uncertainties 
about future value of the investment security. An increase /(decrease) of 5% in the share price would result in a $0.04 million 
(FY22: $0.1 million) change in the investment. 

22.5.5 Capital risk management

The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, to maintain a strong 
capital base to support the Company’s growth objectives and to maximise shareholder value. The Company aims to ensure that it 
meets financial covenants attached to its interest-bearing loans and borrowings that form part of its capital structure requirements. 
Breaches in the financial covenants would permit the bank to immediately call interest-bearing loans and borrowings. In December 
2022 the Company received a waiver of covenant testing from the Bank Syndicate whilst the debt facility refinance was completed. 
Further waivers were received in March and June 2023. The new Trafigura Facilities do not contain any financial covenants.

The Group monitors capital using a gearing ratio, which is net debt divided by the aggregate of equity and net debt. The Group’s net debt is 
calculated as trade and other payables, interest-bearing loans and borrowings (excluding lease liabilities) less cash and short-term deposits.

The Company continuously monitors the capital risks of the business by assessing the financial risks and adjusting the capital structure 
in response to changes in those risks. The Company is continually evaluating its sources and uses of capital.

175 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

22. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES  
(CONTINUED) 
—

22.5 MARKET RISK EXPOSURES (CONTINUED)

22.5.5 Capital risk management (continued)

Interest bearing loans and borrowings 

Trade and other payables 

Less: cash at bank 

Net debt

Equity

Capital and net debt 

Gearing ratio

NOTE

15

12

6

2023 
$’000

7,682

28,479

(38,946)

(2,785)

309,825

307,040

(1%)

2022 
$’000

26,001

 65,770

(76,694)

15,077

336,926

352,003

4%

Syndicated Facilities Agreement covenants

The existing Syndicated Facility agreement contained financial covenants including a Cash Cover Ratio, a Forward Cover Ratio, 
and a minimum cash balance. In December 2022 the Company received a waiver of covenant testing from the Bank Syndicate 
whilst the debt facility refinance was completed. Further waivers were received in March and June 2023. The new Trafigura 
Facilities do not contain any financial covenants.

The Group continues to monitor capital by assessing the financial risks and adjusting the capital structure in response to 
changes in those risks. The Group is continually evaluating its sources and uses of capital. The Group is not subject to any 
externally imposed capital requirements.

The Directors consider the carrying values of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in the consolidated financial 
statements approximate their fair values.

22.5.6 Fair value hierarchy

The following table provides the fair value measurement hierarchy of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities. The following 
financial instruments are carried at fair value in the statement of financial position and measured at fair value through profit or 
loss or Other Comprehensive Income.

176 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

22. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES  
(CONTINUED) 
—

22.5 MARKET RISK EXPOSURES (CONTINUED)

22.5.6 Fair value hierarchy (continued)

2023

Assets

Trade receivables at fair value

Listed equity investments

Derivative financial instruments

Liabilities 

Derivative financial instruments

Deferred consideration

2022

Assets

Trade receivables at fair value

Listed equity investments

Derivative financial instruments

Liabilities 

Derivative financial instruments

Deferred consideration

QUOTED PRICES IN 
ACTIVE MARKETS 
LEVEL 1 $'000

SIGNIFICANT 
OBSERVABLE INPUTS  
LEVEL 2 $'000

SIGNIFICANT 
UNOBSERVABLE 
INPUTS LEVEL 3 $'000

3,335

718

-

-

-

-

-

69

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

QUOTED PRICES IN 
ACTIVE MARKETS 
LEVEL 1 $'000

SIGNIFICANT 
OBSERVABLE INPUTS  
LEVEL 2 $'000

SIGNIFICANT 
UNOBSERVABLE 
INPUTS LEVEL 3 $'000

6,259

 1,105

-

-

-

-

-

-

3,103

-

-

-

-

-

1,918

The techniques and inputs used to value the financial assets and liabilities are as follows:

 Š Listed equity investments: Fair value based on quoted market price at 30 June 2023.

 Š Derivative financial instruments (gold and base metal forward contracts): are marked-to-market value based on spot prices at 

balance date and future delivery prices and volumes, as provided by trade counterparty.

 Š Trade receivables at fair value: refer to note 7. 

177 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

23. RECONCILIATION OF PROFIT AFTER TAX TO NET CASH FLOWS 
—

Reconciliation of profit after tax to net cash flows used in operating activities:

Net profit after tax

Adjustments for:

Impairment loss on mine properties / exploration

Depreciation and amortisation

Rehabilitation expense/(reversal of expense)

Fair value adjustment/remeasurement of financial assets and liabilities

Income tax expense net of tax payments 

Exploration and evaluation assets written off

Share based payments

(Gain) / Loss on revaluation of commodity derivatives and foreign exchange differences 

(Gain) / Loss on disposal of plant and equipment

Interest expense (unwinding of discount)

Changes in assets and liabilities

Increase / (Decrease) in trade and other payables

Increase / (Decrease) in other liabilities

Increase / (Decrease) in prepaid borrowing costs 

Increase / (Decrease) in provisions

Increase / (Decrease) in trade and other receivables

Increase / (Decrease) in inventories

Increase / (Decrease) in prepayments

Net cash flows from operating activities

2023 
$’000

2022 
$’000

(52,221)

(81,688)

20,846

104,130

(3,274)

1,657

(11,220)

24

797

(113)

(31)

2,816

(37,291)

1,435

(1,053)

(3,620)

10,422

14,678

(2,118)

45,864

135,687

137,816

3,531

(26,028)

(19,670)

33

1,780

178

43

2,754

18,465

(1,182)

1,053

(4,752)

861

(14,476)

(312)

154,093

178 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

24. AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION  
—

The auditor of Aurelia Metals Limited is Ernst & Young.

Fees to Ernst & Young (Australia)

Fees for auditing the statutory financial report of the parent covering the Group

783

681

2023 
$’000

2022 
$’000

Fees for other services

Business combinations tax advisory and other tax advisory services performed for the 
consolidated entity

Business combinations financial advisory services performed for the consolidated entity

Tax compliance services performed for the consolidated entity 

Total fees to Ernst & Young (Australia) 

There were no other services provided by Ernst & Young other than as disclosed above.

-

26

79

888

226

143

79

1,129

25. PARENT COMPANY INFORMATION  
—

The financial information for the parent entity, Aurelia Metals Limited has been prepared on the same basis as the consolidated 
financial statements except for investment in subsidiaries.

Current assets

Non-current assets

Total assets

Current liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Total liabilities

Net assets

Issued capital

Reserves

Accumulated losses

Total shareholders' equity

Profit/(loss) for the year

Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year

2023 
$’000

61,473

302,744

364,217

134,231

478

134,709

229,508

357,017

13,919

(141,428)

229,508

5,177

1,964

2022 
$’000

81,836

 224,717

306,553

169,296

13,992

183,288

123,265

334,659

11,159

(210,355)

135,463

16,465

12,009

179 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

25. PARENT COMPANY INFORMATION (CONTINUED) 
—

25.1 COMMITMENTS

Commitments contracted for at reporting date but not recognised as liabilities are as follows:

Payable not later than 12 months

26. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES  
—

26.1 CAPITAL COMMITMENTS

The commitments to be undertaken are as follows:

Payable not later than 12 months

27.2 EXPLORATION AND MINING

The commitments to be undertaken are as follows:

Payable not later than 12 months

The commitments relate to exploration/mining lease minimum annual expenditures.

26.3 GUARANTEES

2023 
$’000

2,715

2022 
$’000

4,425

2023 
$’000

34,505

2022 
$’000

26,131

2023 
$’000

6,669

2022 
$’000

6,310

The Group has a $56.8 million Guarantee Facility as part of the existing Syndicated Facilities Agreement. Under the facility, 
Letters of Credit with an aggregate value of $56.8 million (30 June 2022: $56.8 million) have been drawn consisting of 
environmental guarantees for the Company’s three operating mine sites and its exploration tenements as well as rental bonds.  
As at 30 June 2023 $56.8 million (2022: $30.7 million) is held by the banking syndicate to cash back these guarantees.

180 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

26. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED) 
—

26.4 CONTINGENT LIABILITIES 

At 30 June 2022, a contingent liability amounting to $4.25 million related to the acquisition of Dargues Gold Mine was released 
because the conditions for settlement were not met. There are no contingent liabilities as at 30 June 2023.  

27. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 
—

Transactions between related parties are on normal commercial terms and conditions no more favorable than those available to 
other parties unless otherwise stated.

27.1 TRANSACTIONS WITH OTHER RELATED PARTIES

During the period, the following transactions with related parties occurred:

Hollach Services Pty Ltd (i)

Total payments to related parties 

(i)  Directors’ fees were paid to Hollach Services Pty Ltd; a company of which Paul Harris is a Director.

27.2 TRANSACTIONS WITH KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Compensation of key management personnel:

Short – term employee benefits

Post – employment benefits 

Share based payments transactions 

Total compensation paid to key management personnel

2023 
$’000

125

125

2023 
$’000

2,591

87

256

2,934

2022 
$’000

125

125

2022 
$’000

2,093

82

788

3,421

The amounts disclosed in the table are the amounts recognised as an expense during the reporting period related to 
key management personnel. Detailed information about the remuneration received by each KMP is disclosed in the 
Remuneration Report. 

181 
—

AURELIA METALSNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

27. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED) 
—

27.2 TRANSACTIONS WITH KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL (CONTINUED)

Key management personnel interests in the Employee Performance Rights Plan

Performance Rights held by Key Management Personnel under the Employee Performance Rights Plan have the following 
expiry dates:

PERFORMANCE RIGHTS TRANCHES

EXPIRY DATE

2023 NUMBER 
OUTSTANDING

2022 NUMBER 
OUTSTANDING

Class 19A

Class 19C

Class FY21

Class FY22

Class FY23

Total KMP Performance Rights

30-Jun-22

30-Nov-21

30-Jun-23

30-Jun-24

30-Jun-25

-

-

-

2,071,260

3,377,554

5,448,814

1,970,678

-

3,108,620

3,429,653

-

8,508,951

27.3 OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

There were no other related party transactions during the year (FY22: nil).

28. NEW ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND INTERPRETATIONS  
—

Accounting standards and interpretations issued but not yet effective

Certain new Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations have been published that are not mandatory for reporting 
periods commencing 1 July 2022 and have not been early adopted by the Company for the reporting period ending 
30 June 2023.

The potential effect of the revised Standards/Interpretations on the Group’s consolidated financial statements has not yet 
been determined.

182 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) 

29. DEED OF CROSS GUARANTEE 
—

Pursuant to ASIC Corporations (Wholly owned Companies) Instrument 2016/785, Aurelia and its wholly owned subsidiaries 
entered into a deed of cross guarantee in 2018 and are relieved from the requirement to prepare and lodge an audited 
financial report. 

The effect of the Guarantee is that Aurelia has guaranteed to pay any deficiency in the event of winding up of any controlled 
entity which is a party to the Guarantee or if they do not meet their obligations under the terms of any debt subject to 
the Guarantee. The controlled entities which are parties to the Guarantee have given a similar guarantee in the event that 
Aurelia is wound up or if it does not meet its obligations under the terms of any debt subject to the Guarantee.

The Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss & Other Comprehensive Income 
for the closed group is not different to the Group’s Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Profit or Loss & Other 
Comprehensive Income.

30. EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD 
—

Since 30 June 2023 and until the date of signing of this report (all mentioned previously in the above report), the following has 
occurred:

 Š A new Director appointed - Mr Lyn Brazil (and his alternate, Mr Bradley Newcombe) was appointed 17 July 2023

 Š The retail equity raise completed in July 2023 with ~168 million new shares issued

 Š The Trafigura debt facilities financial close occurred in August 2023 and the 120 million warrants were issued to Trafigura 

(with an exercise price of A$0.25/share and a four year term). 

183 
—

AURELIA METALSDIRECTORS’ DECLARATION 
—

In accordance with a resolution of the Directors of Aurelia Metals Limited, I state that: 

1.  In the opinion of the Directors:

a)   The financial statements and notes of the consolidated entity are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:

i) 

 giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2023 and of its performance for 
the year ended on that date; and 

ii)   complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the 

Corporations Regulations 2001; and

  b)   the financial statements and notes also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in the notes; 

and

c)   there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as when they become 

due and payable. 

2.   This declaration has been made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the Directors in accordance with 

section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ending 30 June 2023.

On behalf of the Board,

Peter Botten 
Chair

Bryan Quinn 
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer

30 August 2023

184 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ernst & Young 
111 Eagle Street 
Brisbane  QLD  4000 Australia 
GPO Box 7878 Brisbane  QLD  4001 

  Tel: +61 7 3011 3333 
Fax: +61 7 3011 3100 
ey.com/au 

Independent Auditor's Report to the Members of Aurelia Metals Limited

Report on the Audit of the Financial Report 

Opinion 

We have audited the financial report of Aurelia Metals Limited (the Company) and its subsidiaries 
(collectively the Group), which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at  
30 June 2023, the consolidated statement of profit and loss and other comprehensive income, 
consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year 
then ended, notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies, 
and the directors' declaration. 

In our opinion, the accompanying financial report of the Group is in accordance with the Corporations 
Act 2001, including: 

a) 

b) 

giving a true and fair view of the consolidated financial position of the Group as at 30 June 
2023 and of its consolidated financial performance for the year ended on that date; and 

complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001. 

Basis for Opinion 

We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Our responsibilities under 
those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial 
Report section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance with the auditor 
independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and the ethical requirements of the 
Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board’s APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional 
Accountants (including Independence Standards) (the Code) that are relevant to our audit of the 
financial report in Australia. We have also fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with 
the Code.  

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis 
for our opinion. 

Key Audit Matters 

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in 
our audit of the financial report of the current year. These matters were addressed in the context of 
our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, but we do not provide 
a separate opinion on these matters. For each matter below, our description of how our audit 
addressed the matter is provided in that context. 

We have fulfilled the responsibilities described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the 
Financial Report section of our report, including in relation to these matters. Accordingly, our audit 
included the performance of procedures designed to respond to our assessment of the risks of 
material misstatement of the financial report. The results of our audit procedures, including the 
procedures performed to address the matters below, provide the basis for our audit opinion on the 
accompanying financial report. 

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited 
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

185 
—

AURELIA METALS 
 
 
Carrying value of Mine Properties and Property, Plant and Equipment  

Why significant 

How our audit addressed the key audit matter 

At 30 June 2023, the Group’s consolidated 
statement of financial position included 
$261.4m of Mine Properties and Property, Plant 
and Equipment.    

At the end of each reporting period, the Group 
exercises judgement in determining whether 
there is any indication of impairment of its cash-
generating units (CGUs) as disclosed in Note 10 
to the financial statements. If any such 
indicators exist, the Group estimates the 
recoverable amount of the non-current assets in 
the relevant CGU. 

At 31 December 2022, the Group determined its 
decision to optimize the life-of-mine for the Hera 
CGU represented an impairment indicator and 
perform impairment testing of the CGU. This 
resulted in an impairment charge of $5.4m 
being recorded at that time.  

At 30 June 2023, the Group assessed other 
than the Group’s net assets exceeding its market 
capitalisation, there were no indicators of 
impairment for its CGUs. The Group’s market 
capitalisation deficiency existed at 30 June 
2022, being the time of the last detailed 
impairment test for Peak and Dargues CGUs.  

At 30 June 2023, the Group evaluated whether 
there was evidence to suggest a decline in 
recoverable amount of the most recent 
impairment test. This analysis concluded the 
most recent impairment tests provided 
sufficient evidence of no additional impairment 
being required as at 30 June 2023. 

Our audit procedures included the following: 

►  Assessed whether the Group’s determination of 

CGUs was in accordance with Australian 
Accounting Standards. 

►  Assessed the Group’s process for identifying and 
considering external and internal information 
which may be an indicator of impairment and 
evaluated the completeness of the factors 
identified. 

►  Compared the Group’s market capitalisation 

relative to its net assets. 

► 

For the Hera CGU: 

►  Assessed whether the valuation 

methodology applied by the Group to 
measure the recoverable amount of the 
CGU met the requirements of Australian 
Accounting Standards. 

►  Tested the mathematical accuracy of 

managements impairment model.  

► 

Involved our valuation specialists to assess 
the key cashflow forecast assumptions such 
as commodity price, discount rates and 
foreign exchange rates with reference to 
external observable market data. 

►  Compared future production forecasts in 

the impairment model to updated reserves 
and resources estimates, and understood 
the Group’s reserve estimation processes, 
including assessing the qualifications, 
competence and objectivity of the Group’s 
internal experts and the scope and 
appropriateness of their work. 

►  Assessed the operating and capital 

expenditure included in the impairment 
models with reference to updated plans for 
the mine.   

►  Performed sensitivity analysis to evaluate 

the effect on the CGUs recoverable amount 

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited 
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

186 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
 
Why significant 

How our audit addressed the key audit matter 

Key cashflow forecast assumptions used in the 
Group’s measurement of recoverable amount of 
its CGUs, such as forecast commodity prices, 
foreign exchange rates and discount rates 
require significant estimation and judgement.  
Identifying and evaluating changes in these key 
assumptions effects the completeness of the 
Group’s impairment indicator assessment and its 
recoverable amount calculations, should 
impairment testing be required.  

We considered the Group’s impairment indicator 
assessment, impairment testing and the related 
disclosures in the financial report to be a key 
audit matter.  

of reasonably possible changes in key 
forecast assumptions. 

►  Recalculated the carrying amount of the 
Hera CGU and compared the carrying 
amount to the recoverable amount to 
determine the estimated impairment 
charge.  

►  Assessed the adequacy of the disclosures in 
Notes 9 and 10 of the financial report. 

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited 
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

187 
—

AURELIA METALS 
 
 
 
Information Other than the Financial Report and Auditor’s Report Thereon 

The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the 
information included in the Company’s 2023 Annual Report other than the financial report and our 
auditor’s report thereon. We obtained the Directors’ Report that is to be included in the Annual 
Report, prior to the date of this auditor’s report, and we expect to obtain the remaining sections of the 
Annual Report after the date of this auditor’s report.  

Our opinion on the financial report does not cover the other information and we do not and will not 
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon, with the exception of the Remuneration Report 
and our related assurance opinion. 

In connection with our audit of the financial report, our responsibility is to read the other information 
and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial 
report or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.  

If, based on the work we have performed on the other information obtained prior to the date of this 
auditor’s report, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are 
required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard. 

Responsibilities of the Directors for the Financial Report 

The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a 
true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 
and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the 
financial report that gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement, whether due to 
fraud or error. 

In preparing the financial report, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to 
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters relating to going concern and using the 
going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or to cease 
operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so. 

Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Report 

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report as a whole is 
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that 
includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an 
audit conducted in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards will always detect a material 
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material 
if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic 
decisions of users taken on the basis of this financial report. 

As part of an audit in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards, we exercise professional 
judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also: 

► 

Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to 
fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit 
evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not 

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited 
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

188 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
 
detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, 
as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override 
of internal control. 

►  Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit 

procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an 
opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control.  

►  Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting 

estimates and related disclosures made by the directors.  

►  Conclude on the appropriateness of the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting 

and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events 
or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. 
If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s 
report to the related disclosures in the financial report or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to 
modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of 
our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease to 
continue as a going concern.  

►  Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial report, including the 

disclosures, and whether the financial report represents the underlying transactions and events in 
a manner that achieves fair presentation. 

►  Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or 

business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the financial report. We are 
responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the Group audit. We remain solely 
responsible for our audit opinion. 

We communicate with the directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of 
the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we 
identify during our audit. 

We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical 
requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other 
matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, actions 
taken to eliminate threats or safeguards applied. 

From the matters communicated to the directors, we determine those matters that were of most 
significance in the audit of the financial report of the current year and are therefore the key audit 
matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public 
disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter 
should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would 
reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication. 

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited 
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

189 
—

AURELIA METALS 
 
 
 
Report on the Audit of the Remuneration Report 

Opinion on the Remuneration Report 

We have audited the Remuneration Report included in the directors' report for the year ended  
30 June 2023. 

In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of Aurelia Metals Limited for the year ended 30 June 2023, 
complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. 

Responsibilities 

The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the 
Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our 
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in 
accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. 

Ernst & Young 

Kellie McKenzie 
Partner 
Brisbane 
30 August 2023 

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited 
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

190 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNAUDITED PERIODIC CORPORATE REPORT 
VERIFICATION PROCEDURE 
—

1. PURPOSE 
—

We are committed to providing clear, concise, timely and 
effective disclosures in our corporate reports. This Procedure 
sets out the process undertaken by Aurelia Metals Limited 
to verify the integrity of any Periodic Corporate Report we 
release to the market that is not audited or reviewed by an 
external auditor.

2. SCOPE 
—

This Procedure applies to Aurelia Metals Limited and all its 
subsidiaries (Aurelia Metals).

This Procedure applies to any Aurelia Metals periodic 
corporate report, including:

 Š annual directors' report;

 Š annual half yearly financial statements;

 Š quarterly activity report;

 Š quarterly cash flow report;

 Š integrated report;

 Š sustainability report; and

 Š any similar periodic report prepared for the benefit of 

investors, provided that the respective report has not been 
subject to audit or review by an external auditor (each a 
Periodic Corporate Report).

This Procedure should be read in conjunction with Aurelia 
Metals' Continuous Disclosure Policy and Shareholder 
Communication Standard.

3. RESPONSIBILITIES 
—

Aurelia Metals' management has developed practices and 
guidance material so that the Company can satisfy itself 
that our Periodic Corporate Reports are accurate, balanced 
and provide investors with appropriate information to make 
informed investment decisions.

This Procedure is intended to ensure that all applicable laws, 
regulations and company policies have been complied with, 
and that appropriate approvals are obtained before a Periodic 
Corporate Report is released to the market.

4. REQUIREMENTS 
—

Aurelia Metals’ process for verifying unaudited Periodic 
Corporate Reports is as follows:

 Š each Periodic Corporate Report is prepared by, or under 

the supervision of, subject-matter experts;

 Š material statements in each Periodic Corporate Report 
are reviewed by the relevant functional heads so that 
the functional head is satisfied that they are accurate, 
not misleading, and meet regulatory requirements, 
and that the Periodic Corporate Report contains no 
material omissions;

 Š information about Aurelia Metals' mineral resources and 

ore reserves are only included in a report if the information 
complies with the ASX Listing Rules;

 Š information in a Periodic Corporate Report that relates 

to financial projections, statements as to future financial 
performance or changes to the strategy of Aurelia Metals 
(taken as a whole) must be approved by the Board; and

 Š each draft Periodic Corporate Report is reviewed by the 
Corporate Affairs Manager, the Chief Financial Officer, 
the General Counsel and Company Secretary and the 
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer before 
its release.

5. PROCEDURE STATUS 
AND REVIEW 
—

This procedure was approved by the Aurelia Metal's Audit 
Committee on 21 June 2021.

The Audit Committee will review this Procedure as 
required having regard to the changing circumstances 
of the Company.

REVISION

1

DATE

CHANGE DESCRIPTION

21 June 2021

New procedure - endorsed by the Audit Committee

191 
—

AURELIA METALS 
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION 
—

Capital (as at 27 September 2023)

SHARE CAPITAL

ORDINARY SHAREHOLDERS

SHAREHOLDINGS WITH LESS THAN A MARKETABLE PARCEL OF $500 WORTH OF ORDINARY SHARES

MARKET PRICE (CLOSING PRICE ON THE ASX AS AT 27 SEPTEMBER 2023)

Distribution of fully paid shares (as at 27 September 2023)

RANGE

100,001 and over

10,001 to 100,000

5,001 to 10,000

1,001 to 5,000

1 to 1,000

Total

SECURITIES

1,528,438,499

140,606,135

11,010,905

5,033,226

154,442

1,685,243,207

Unmarketable parcels 

6,350,315

Substantial shareholders (as at 27 September 2023)

%

NO. OF HOLDERS

90.70

8.34

0.65

0.30

0.01

100.00

0.38

1,264

3,590

1,331

1,714

488

8,387

2,529

HOLDER NAME

BRAZIL FARMING PTY LTD

RENAISSANCE SMALLER COMPANIES PTY LTD

Total

Unquoted Equity Securities

Fully paid ordinary shares

NUMBER

319,357,179

65,358,189

384,715,368

1,685,243,207

8,387

2,529

$0.087

%

15.07

42.80

15.87

20.44

5.82

100.00

30.15

%

18.96

5.28

24.24

Unquoted equity securities the Company has on issue are Performance Rights and unlisted warrants issued to Trafigura Pte Ltd.

Performance rights

Performance Rights on issue have been issued under the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan. 

NUMBER OF HOLDERS

NUMBER OF 
PERFORMANCE RIGHTS

15

55

70

3,388,780

8,268,300

11,657,080

TESTING DATES

30 JUNE 2024

30 JUNE 2025

CLASS

FY22

FY23

Total

Trafigura warrants

Trafigura Pte Ltd has been issued 120,000,000 warrants as part of the financing facility announced by the Company on  
31 May 2023. 

192 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023Twenty largest shareholders (as at 27 September 2023) 

HOLDER NAME

BRAZIL FARMING PTY LTD

HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED

J P MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED

CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED

NATIONAL NOMINEES LIMITED

BNP PARIBAS NOMS PTY LID 

FIRST SAMUEL LTD ACN 086243567 

HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED

UBS NOMINEES PTY LTD

FEDERATION MINING PTY LTD

BNP PARIBAS NOMINEES PTY LTD

RAC & JD BRICE SUPERANNUATION P/L

MR BRADLEY JOHN NEWCOMBE

MR STILIANOS PANTELIDIS

WARBONT NOMINEES PTY LTD

RYDER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD

BAOHUA PTY LTD

NEWECONOMY COM AU NOMINEES PTY LIMITED<900 ACCOUNT>

Total

Balance of registry

Grand total

Voting rights

Fully paid ordinary shares

CURRENT BALANCE

ISSUED CAPITAL (%)

319,357,179

139,310,113

105,826,972

102,842,292

71,935,734

47,761,375

38,953,954

30,938,184

30,322,855

22,884,599

14,766,625

11,726,038

8,801,281

8,665,107

8,535,000

7,664,777

7,447,575

7,139,479

6,570,000

5,998,216

997,447,355

687,795,852

1,685,243,207

18.96

8.27

6.28

6.10

4.27

2.83

2.31

1.84

1.80

1.36

0.88

0.70

0.52

0.51

0.51

0.45

0.44

0.42

0.39

0.36

59.20

40.80

100.00

Ordinary shares on issue carry voting rights on a one for one basis. Unquoted Equity Securities on issue do not carry  
voting rights.

Share Buy-Backs  
There is no current on-market buy-back scheme.

193 
—

AURELIA METALSSCHEDULE OF TENEMENT INTERESTS 
—

TENEMENT

NAME

LOCATION

HOLDER

EXPIRY 
DATE

SIZE  
(KM2)

EL7447

Box Creek

EL7524

EL7529

Barrow

Lyell

EL4232

Nymagee

Nymagee, 90km south of Cobar,

western NSW

Defiance Resources Pty Ltd

2/02/2026

145.0

25km WNW of Nymagee

Defiance Resources Pty Ltd

3/05/2026

60.9

20km west of Nymagee

Defiance Resources Pty Ltd

3/05/2026

8.7

Nymagee, 90km south of Cobar,

Nymagee Resources Pty

western NSW

(Ausmindex Pty Ltd 5%)

17/03/2025

14.5

EL4458

Nymagee

Nymagee, 90km south of Cobar,

Nymagee Resources Pty Ltd

western NSW

(Ausmindex Pty Limited 5%)

26/11/2028

11.6

ML53

Nymagee Mine

Nymagee, 90km south of Cobar,

Nymagee Resources Pty Ltd

western NSW

(Ausmindex Pty Limited 5%)

31/12/2026

0.1

ML90

Nymagee Mine

Nymagee, 90km south of Cobar,

Nymagee Resources Pty Ltd

western NSW

(Ausmindex Pty Limited 5%)

31/12/2026

0.3

ML5295

Nymagee Mine

Nymagee, 90km south of Cobar,

Nymagee Resources Pty Ltd

western NSW

(Ausmindex Pty Limited 5%)

31/12/2026

3.3

ML5828

Nymagee Mine

Nymagee, 90km south of Cobar,

Nymagee Resources Pty Ltd

western NSW

(Ausmindex Pty Limited 5%)

31/12/2026

0.02

PLL847

Nymagee Mine

Nymagee, 90km south of Cobar,

Nymagee Resources Pty Ltd

western NSW

(Ausmindex Pty Limited 5%)

31/12/2026

0.1

EL6162

Hera

ML1686

Hera Mine

ML1746

Hera Mine

Nymagee, 90km south of Cobar,

western NSW

Nymagee, 90km south of Cobar,

western NSW

Nymagee, 90km south of Cobar,

western NSW

Hera Resources Pty Ltd

26/11/2024

130.0

Hera Resources Pty Ltd

16/05/2034

13.1

Hera Resources Pty Ltd

7/12/2037

0.6

MLA620

Federation

10km south of Nymagee, NSW

Hera Resources Pty Ltd

NA

37.47

EL8060

Nymagee North

15km N of Nymagee, western 
NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

20/02/2024

37.9

EL8523

Margaret Vale

EL8548

Narri

7km NE of Cobar,

western NSW

25km SE of Cobar, western 
NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

1/03/2026

46.9

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

3/04/2026

125.7

EL6401

EL5933

Rookery East

50km SE of Cobar western NSW Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

5/04/2024

17.5

Peak

Cobar, western NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

16/04/2026

277.5

EL8567

Kurrajong

15km N of Nymagee, western 
NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

22/05/2029

61.2

EL7355

Nymagee East

15km E of Nymagee, western 
NSW

Placeholder Peak Gold Mines 
Pty Ltd

24/06/2027

72.8

EL6149

Mafeesh

55km S of Cobar, western NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

17/11/2026

14.6

194 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023TENEMENT

NAME

LOCATION

HOLDER

EXPIRY 
DATE

SIZE  
(KM2)

EL5982

Normavale

35km SW of Nymagee, western 
NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

(75%) and Zintoba Pty Ltd

29/08/2026

26.2

(25%)

EL6127

Rookery South

Cobar-Nymagee, western NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

24/09/2023

Full renewal 
submitted

286.0

CML6

CML7

CML8

CML9

MPL854

ML1483

ML1805

Central Area

Cobar, western NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

27/02/2034

1.3

Coronation-

Beechworth

Cobar, western NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

28/06/2025

11.9

Peak- Occidental

Cobar, western NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

16/09/2033

12.5

Queen Bee

Cobar, western NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

26/09/2027

5.3

The Dam

Cobar, western NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

29/09/2045

0.04

-

Cobar, western NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

27/01/2029

Spains Tank

Cobar, western NSW

Peak Gold Mines Pty Ltd

14/05/2041

EL6012

Booths Reward

20km north of Gundagai, NSW

Big Island Mining Pty Ltd

22/10/2023

Full renewal 
to be 
submitted

0.5

0.9

11.3

EL6548

Eurodux

5km north of Braidwood, NSW

Big Island Mining Pty Ltd

5/04/2026

58.8

EL8373

EL8243

EL8244

EL8372

EL9402

ML1675

Booths Reward

Sth

18km north of Gundagai, NSW

Big Island Mining Pty Ltd

20/05/2028

11.3

Gundagai

7km NNW of Gundagai, NSW

Big Island Mining Pty Ltd

7/03/2025

22.5

Tumut

12km east of Tumut, NSW

Big Island Mining Pty Ltd

7/03/2025

11.2

Majors Creek

5km south of Braidwood, NSW

Big Island Mining Pty Ltd

20/05/2027

227.9

Bombay

Braidwood, NSW

Big Island Mining Pty Ltd

10/05/2028

201.6

Dargues Reef

10km south of Braidwood, NSW

Big Island Mining Pty Ltd

12/04/2045

3.11

EL8999

Kadungle

10km south east of Tullamore, 
NSW

Defiance Resources (10.4%),

Emmerson Resources (89.6%)

30/09/2026

43.34

195 
—

AURELIA METALS196 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023197 
—

AURELIA METALS198 
—

ANNUAL REPORT 2023COMPANY INFORMATION 
—

AURELIA METALS LIMITED

STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING

ABN 37 108 476 384

DIRECTORS

Peter Botten 

Independent Non-Executive Chair 

Bryan Quinn 

 Managing Director and  
Chief Executive Officer 

Lyn Brazil  

Non-Executive Director

Susie Corlett 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Bruce Cox 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Helen Gillies 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Paul Harris 

Independent Non-Executive Director 

Bob Vassie 

Independent Non-Executive Director

COMPANY SECRETARY

Rochelle Carey

REGISTERED OFFICE AND 
PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS

Aurelia Metals Limited 
Level 17, 144 Edward Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 
GPO Box 7, Brisbane QLD 4001 
Telephone: (07) 3180 5000 
Email: office@aureliametals.com.au

Aurelia Metals Limited shares are listed on the Australian 
Securities Exchange (ASX Code: AMI)

SHARE REGISTER

Automic Group 
Level 5, 126 Phillip Street, Sydney NSW 2000

Investor services: 1300 288 664 
General enquiries: (02) 8072 1400

Email: hello@automic.com.au 
www.automicgroup.com.au

AUDITORS

Ernst & Young 
111 Eagle Street 
Brisbane QLD 4000

WEBSITE

www. aureliametals.com

AURELIA METALS

199 
—

Level 17, 144 Edward Street, Brisbane QLD 4000

Telephone: (07) 3180 5000 
Email: office@aureliametals.com.au

aureliametals.com