Badger Meter
Annual Report 2012

Plain-text annual report

2012 ANNUAL REPORT As the world’s populAtion grows, so does the demAnd for fresh, cleAn wAter A nd other precious nAturAl resources. Badger Meter products help water and gas utilities, Municipalities and industrial custoMers around the world not only count every drop, But use that inforMation to efficiently generate revenues, Manage their systeMs and control processes. froM Metering a hoMe for the first tiMe, to developing advanced Meter reading technologies and enaBling Businesses to Measure and control a variety of liquids, Badger Meter is helping the world conserve. BAdger meter is A leAding innovAtor in flow meA surement And control products, serving wAter And gA s utilities, municipAlities, And commerciAl And industriAl customers worldwide. Me asUr e our products measure a variety of liquids, from water to oil and chemicals, and are known for their high degree of accuracy and long-lasting durability. MON It Or advanced metering solutions from Badger Meter provide valuable and timely measurement data that help customers monitor their systems and improve operations. CONtrOl Badger Meter low-flow precision valves provide precise, accurate control of liquids and gases in production processes and in research and development applications. B a d g e r M e t e r s a l e s M I X 2 0 1 2 Municipal Water Industrial Flow Products Specialty Products 66.7% 29.0% 4.3% M U N I C I P A L W AT E R MARKETS SERVED: Water utilities I N D U S T R I A L F L O W P R O D U C T S MARKETS SERVED: Industrial process Building automation / HVAC Chemical and petrochemical Oil and gas Water and wastewater Test and measurement Aerospace Research and development Pharmaceutical Food and beverage Power generation Mining Semiconductor S P E C I A LT Y P R O D U C T S MARKETS SERVED: Gas utilities Construction deAr s hAr e h o l d e r s , whenever i see a popular television commercial related to a certain brand of beer, i am constantly amazed at the oxymoronic advice of the most interesting man in the world trying to sell the product by advising his friends to “stay thirsty.” he might have more success by using the phrase: “stay fluid, my friends.” that’s exactly what we try to do at Badger Meter. like most companies, we operate in a challenging business environment. every day, we deal with the paradox of maintaining a solid foundation, while staying sufficiently fluid to address the ever-changing currents of our marketplaces. we need to continually develop new products, aggressively pursue new market opportunities, integrate new acquisitions, and carefully manage our financial resources. this annual report highlights a strong financial year for earnings rebounded from the unusually weak year we had in our company. it also demonstrates our importance to the 2011, increasing 46% in 2012 to $28.0 million. we generated markets we serve as we continue to help the world conserve $34.8 million in cash from operations. even after acquiring its precious resources—one drop at a time. today, more racine federated, executing a $30 million stock repurchase than ever, our flow meters are an essential part of many program and increasing our dividend for the twentieth sustainable resource control processes. and our meters consecutive year, we still ended 2012 with a debt-to- continue to provide our customers with the key information capitalization ratio of 28%. the net result is that we have they need to optimize those resources and to stay fluid— significantly grown the business, while maintaining a strong just as Badger Meter works hard to stay fluid. balance sheet. we are well positioned for future growth. We stay fluid for our shareholders. i should also point out that our 2012 stock repurchase in 2012, we saw significant increases in our sales, earnings and cash flow. while the acquisition of racine federated, inc. in January of 2012 contributed much of the increase, it also was a good year for our legacy program allowed us to retire 888,000 shares of our stock at an average price of $34 per share. this created significant value for our shareholders, as the current stock price has risen well beyond that level. products. total 2012 sales of $319.7 million increased We stay fluid for our customers. 21.6% over 2011, primarily due to the addition of the racine federated products. however, even excluding racine federated, our municipal water meter products were up 12% and our industrial flow products increased 6.4%, driving a strong year for our company. in 2012, we greatly expanded our product offerings through new product development and the addition of the racine federated product lines. our long-term focus has enabled us to continue to invest in research 2 and development projects, even in weaker years, which We stay fluid for the future. enables us to offer our customers leading-edge flow management products year after year. our strong 2012 performance positions us well for the future. we have completed the integration of racine federated and racine federated brought us new flow technologies, with are looking aggressively at new acquisition opportunities. product lines such as vortex, ultrasonic and differential we continue to invest in research and development projects pressure meters. as discussed further in this annual report, to bring the latest flow technologies to our customers. we continue to offer a wide variety of meters and valves with applications in hvac, agriculture, food and beverage, petroleum and many other industries. in 2012, we also developed and introduced a full line of oval gear meters for industrial applications. these non-utility product lines have grown to almost one-third of our sales and we expect to see sustained growth as the united states and global economies continue their long recovery. in the water utility market, we developed and introduced the e-series® ultrasonic water meters and a new lcd we expect to benefit from increased demand for water meters as the housing market continues to recover. we are also aggressively pursuing new opportunities created by the recent decision of one of our major competitors to exit the mechanical water meter business in the u.s. later this year. we believe these events, along with our new product offerings, will drive future growth for our company. we also believe that increased industrial spending and the opportunity to cross-sell the new racine federated product we hAve significAntly grown the Business, while mAint Aining A strong BAlAnce sheet. we Are well positioned for future growth. y r O g e t a C y B s e l a s 2 1 0 2 66.7% 11.3% 17.7% 4.3% Municipal Water Non-Municipal Water Industrial Flow Products Specialty Products register for use with our water meter products. we also continue to improve our market-leading orion® automatic meter reading product family, with a new two-way system and strong analytics software that enable our customers to better manage their water systems. our two-way system allows customers to upgrade their radio transmitters remotely, without gaining access to the consumers’ properties. our fixed network radios offer a drive-by back-up option that enables utilities to continue to obtain meter readings even if the network system is interrupted, lines with our existing products will drive growth in our industrial flow business. the fundamental drivers of our business remain the same. increased scarcity has driven people, businesses and governments to look for new ways to conserve their water, chemicals, oil, and other resources. and as they do, we will be there with precision products that measure liquids and monitor systems. that includes providing meters to beer producers who advise you to “stay thirsty.” thus providing our customers with a highly reliable meter it is our mission to help our customers conserve the reading system. features such as these have made orion world’s precious resources and to “stay fluid, my friends.” one of the leading water metering systems in the market. new federal regulations go into effect in 2014 that will limit the amount of lead in products used in the delivery of drinking water. for many years, we have offered lead-free thank you for your continued confidence and support. versions of our water meters, including lead-free brass, richard a. Meeusen stainless steel and polymer products. we are proud to state Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer that we have a full line of water meters that meet the new lead standards that will go into effect in 2014. 3 4 water is an essential resource that sustains life. however, our municipal water business includes products such as one in three people around the globe are affected by water the M-series® electromagnetic and dynasonics® ultrasonic scarcity. in the united states, the population has shifted to meters that measure inflows and outflows in water and areas with less water, and in recent years, frequent drought wastewater treatment plants. conditions have created water supply shortages in many regions of the country. new products introduced in 2012 further expand our water measuring and monitoring capabilities. the extended size the case for water conservation is clear, and metering is one range of our e-series® ultrasonic meters meets a broader way to help achieve it. Badger Meter is a leading provider of range of customer requirements. the newest meter reading meters, meter-reading technology and software that enable product is an electronic lcd encoder, with features including municipalities to proactively manage their systems—and improved leak detection, field programming capabilities and conserve water. Water MeterINg status indicators. MeasUre, MONItOr, CONserVe it starts with the water meter providing the information the u.s. environmental protection agency estimates that utilities need to generate revenues by billing customers metering alone can reduce water consumption by 20% - for their water use. combined with today’s technological 40%. By monitoring water utility systems and measuring advancements, the water meter is also an accurate source water and wastewater flow, Badger Meter products play a of a vast array of data that utility managers can use to critical role in helping to conserve the earth’s most precious monitor operations, analyze and track consumption, natural resource—water. the c Ase for wAter conservAtion is cleAr, And metering is one wAy to help A chieve it. detect leaks, and monitor water conservation programs. this critical information can help to reduce water usage and waste. orion® smart endpoint (se), part of our advanced Metering analytics (aMa) Mobile/Backup ORION SE - Network Gateway Transceiver RF Utility RF system, is gaining traction in the market by combining two-way communication and meter reading capabilities with sophisticated analytics-based software. with our broad meter, meter reading and software product portfolio, utilities can select either the orion or galaXy® system to suit their goals and budget. our meter reading systems can also obtain information from natural gas meters. in fact, the city of garretson, south dakota, will be the first in the country to deploy a combined water and natural gas aMa system from Badger Meter in 2013. ORION SE - Smart Endpoint Transceiver for Fixed Network or Mobile Gas Applications ORION® SE - Network Gateway Receiver Public or Private Backhaul Network ReadCenter ORION SE - Smart Endpoint Transceiver for Fixed Network or Mobile Water Applications Mobile/Backup RF The Badger Meter ORION® family of automatic meter reading systems enables utility personnel to obtain meter readings by walking or driving down the street or remotely through fixed network technology. Our Advanced Metering Analytics (AMA) system combines two-way mobile and fixed network meter reading capabilities with sophisticated analytics-based software. 5 6 the united states uses nearly a million dollars’ worth of provide precision fluid and pressure control in reserves energy every minute of every day—every day of the year. where higher temperatures, pressures and concentrations when we save energy, we not only save money, we also of corrosive gases are required to produce oil and gas. reduce demand for fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural Badger Meter preso® differential pressure meters measure gas. and less burning of fossil fuels means lower emissions the thick, slow-moving raw product produced in the tar of carbon dioxide and other pollutants. sands in canada, while our hedland® variable area meters help to ensure proper lubrication and drill-bit temperatures on hydraulic-powered drilling rigs. MeasUre, MONItOr, CONserVe from heating college dorms to drilling for oil, Badger Meter products enable our industrial customers to save energy— and produce it as well. By measuring and monitoring our energy resources, Badger Meter is contributing to global conservation efforts and a healthier environment. 1 2 3 4 Energy Metering and Submetering Irrigation Management Water and Wastewater Management Data Acquisition and Analysis 1 when customers have accurate information about their processes and systems, they can work to improve efficiency, save energy and reduce costs. through acquisitions including data industrial corporation, cox flow Measurement, inc., remag ag and most recently, racine federated, inc., Badger Meter has built an industrial product portfolio that enables customers to both measure and monitor valuable natural resources. HVaC aPPlICatIONs the heating, ventilating and air conditioning (hvac) market provides growth opportunities for several of our industrial products. for example, Badger Meter products measure the energy and water heated or consumed in apartment buildings and buildings on college campuses. they also monitor hydronic energy usage in large industrial facilities and buildings, and in cooling-loop applications such as sensitive computer installations. our data industrial® and dynasonics® Btu meters integrate flow and temperature sensors to provide effective metering solutions used as stand-alone diagnostic equipment or as part of large building automation systems. when customers know precisely what their energy usage is today, they can plan for improvements that save energy and lower costs tomorrow. when customers hAve A ccurAte informAtion ABout their processes And systems, they cAn work to improve efficiency, sAve energy And reduce costs. 2 OIl aNd gas INdUstry the world’s growing energy demands are also driving the need for measuring and monitoring applications in the oil 3 and gas industry. 4 3 1 3 1 in oil and gas drilling projects, our Blancett® turbine meters measure chemicals and water injected into the well head and the resulting wastewater. our research control® valves Badger Meter industrial flow products perform a variety of heating, ventilating and cooling functions in facilities ranging from apartment buildings and college dorms to industrial facilities and commercial buildings. 7 SALES EARNINGS . 7 9 1 3 $ . 0 8 2 $ 5 3 0 3 5 2 0 2 5 1 0 1 5 0 ) s n o i l l i m n i ( s g n i n r a e t e n 08 09 10 11 12 08 09 10 11 12 EPS DIvIDENDS . 5 9 1 $ 6 6 0 $ . 0 8 . 0 6 . 0 4 . 0 2 . 0 e r a h s r e P s d n e d i v i d 08 09 10 11 12 08 09 10 11 12 0 5 3 0 0 3 0 5 2 0 0 2 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 5 0 ) s n o i l l i m n i ( s e l a s t e n s n o i t a r e P o g n i u n i t n o c m o r F s P e d e t u l i d 0 2 . . 5 1 0 1 . . 5 0 0 DECEMBER 31 2012 2011 % ChangE Y e a r - e n d F i n a n c i a l P o s i t i o n ( d o l l a r s i n t h o u s a n d s ) total assets total debt $290,453 $218,910 32.7 $ 66,730 $  1,790 3,627.9 shareholders’ equity $171,247 $179,281 (4.5) debt as a percent of total debt and equity net earnings as a percent of ending equity ot h e r 28.0% 1.0% 2,700.0 16.4% 10.7% 53.3 number of employees 1,366 1,220 12.0 number of shareholders:  in employee plans  of record shares outstanding at december 31 563 981 490 952 14.9 3.0 14,314,029 15,122,701 (5.3) 8 DECEMBER 31 2012 2011 % ChangE OperatiOns (dollars in thousands)Net sales $319,660 $262,915 21.6Net earnings $ 28,032 $ 19,161 46.3DiluteD per COmmOn share amOuntsDiluted earnings $   1.95 $   1.27 53.5Cash dividends $   0.66 $   0.60 10.0Net book value $  11.96 $  11.85 0.9MEASURINGPERFORMANCE         UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 BADGER METER, INC. 4545 W. Brown Deer Road Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53223 (414) 355-0400 A Wisconsin Corporation IRS Employer Identification No. 39-0143280 Commission File No. 001-06706 The Company has the following classes of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of class: Common Stock Common Share Purchase Rights Name of each exchange on which registered: New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange The Company does not have any securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. Indicate by check mark if the Company is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the Company is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act: (Check one). Large accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Accelerated filer Smaller reporting company Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Company as of June 29, 2012 was $510,127,001. For purposes of this calculation only, (i) shares of Common Stock are deemed to have a market value of $37.55 per share, the closing price of the Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on June 29, 2012, and (ii) each of the Company's executive officers and directors is deemed to be an affiliate of the Company. As of February 6, 2013, there were 14,309,738 shares of Common Stock outstanding with a par value of $1 per share. Portions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the registrant's fiscal year, are incorporated by reference from the definitive Proxy Statement into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as other information provided from time to time by Badger Meter, Inc. (the “Company”) or its employees, may contain forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “think,” “should,” “could” and “objective” or similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking statements. All such forward looking statements are based on the Company's then current views and assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties. Some risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward looking statements include those described in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 that include, among other things: • • • • • • • • • • • • • the continued shift in the Company's business from lower cost, manually read meters toward more expensive, value- added automatic meter reading (AMR) systems, advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) systems and advanced metering analytics (AMA) systems that offer more comprehensive solutions to customers' metering needs; the success or failure of newer Company products; changes in competitive pricing and bids in both the domestic and foreign marketplaces, and particularly in continued intense price competition on government bid contracts for lower cost, manually read meters; the actions (or lack thereof) of the Company's competitors; changes in the Company's relationships with its alliance partners, primarily its alliance partners that provide radio solutions, and particularly those that sell products that do or may compete with the Company's products; changes in the general health of the United States and foreign economies, including to some extent such things as the length and severity of global economic downturns, the ability of municipal water utility customers to authorize and finance purchases of the Company's products, the Company's ability to obtain financing, housing starts in the United States, and overall industrial activity; the timing and impact of government programs to stimulate national and global economies; changes in the cost and/or availability of needed raw materials and parts, such as volatility in the cost of brass castings as a result of fluctuations in commodity prices, particularly for copper and scrap metal at the supplier level, foreign- sourced electronic components as a result of currency exchange fluctuations and/or lead times, and plastic resin as a result of changes in petroleum and natural gas prices; the Company's expanded role as a prime contractor for providing complete connectivity systems to governmental entities, which brings with it added risks, including but not limited to, the Company's responsibility for subcontractor performance, additional costs and expenses if the Company and its subcontractors fail to meet the timetable agreed to with the governmental entity, and the Company's expanded warranty and performance obligations; the Company's ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses or products; changes in foreign economic conditions, particularly currency fluctuations in the United States dollar, the Euro and the Mexican peso; the loss of certain single-source suppliers; and changes in laws and regulations, particularly laws dealing with the use of lead (which can be used in the manufacture of certain meters incorporating brass housings) and the United States Federal Communications Commission rules affecting the use and/or licensing of radio frequencies necessary for radio products. All of these factors are beyond the Company's control to varying degrees. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the forward looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward looking statements. The forward looking statements made in this document are made only as of the date of this document and the Company assumes no obligation, and disclaims any obligation, to update any such forward looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. 1 ITEM 1. BUSINESS K. together. beverage; and pharmaceutical production. concrete vibrators. PART I PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS ITEM 1. BUSINESS Badger Meter, Inc. (the “Company”) is a leading innovator, manufacturer and marketer of products incorporating flow Badger Meter, Inc. (the “Company”) is a leading innovator, manufacturer and marketer of products incorporating flow measurement and control technologies serving markets worldwide. The Company was incorporated in 1905. measurement and control technologies serving markets worldwide. The Company was incorporated in 1905. Throughout this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the words “we”, “us” and “our” refer to the Company. Throughout this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the words “we”, “us” and “our” refer to the Company. PART I Available Information Available Information Badger Meter, Inc. (the “Company”) is a leading innovator, manufacturer and marketer of products incorporating flow measurement and control technologies serving markets worldwide. The Company was incorporated in 1905. The Company's Internet address is http://www.badgermeter.com. The Company makes available free of charge (other The Company's Internet address is http://www.badgermeter.com. The Company makes available free of charge (other than an investor's own Internet access charges) through its Internet website its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports than an investor's own Internet access charges) through its Internet website its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, on the same day they are electronically filed on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, on the same day they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company is not including the information contained on or with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company is not including the information contained on or available through its website as a part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10- available through its website as a part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10- K. K. Throughout this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the words “we”, “us” and “our” refer to the Company. Available Information Market Overview, Products, Systems and Solutions Market Overview, Products, Systems and Solutions The Company's Internet address is http://www.badgermeter.com. The Company makes available free of charge (other than an investor's own Internet access charges) through its Internet website its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, on the same day they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company is not including the information contained on or available through its website as a part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10- The core competency of the Company is flow measurement solutions. The Company is a leading innovator, The core competency of the Company is flow measurement solutions. The Company is a leading innovator, manufacturer and marketer of flow measurement and control products, serving water and gas utilities, municipalities and manufacturer and marketer of flow measurement and control products, serving water and gas utilities, municipalities and industrial customers worldwide. Measuring a wide variety of liquids ranging from water and oil to lubricants in industrial industrial customers worldwide. Measuring a wide variety of liquids ranging from water and oil to lubricants in industrial processes, the Company's products are known for their high degree of accuracy, long-lasting durability and ability to provide processes, the Company's products are known for their high degree of accuracy, long-lasting durability and ability to provide valuable and timely measurement information to customers. The Company's product lines fall into three categories: sales of valuable and timely measurement information to customers. The Company's product lines fall into three categories: sales of water meters and related technologies to municipal water utilities (municipal water), sales of meters to various industries for water meters and related technologies to municipal water utilities (municipal water), sales of meters to various industries for water and other fluids (industrial flow) and sales of concrete vibrators and gas meter radios to unique markets (specialty water and other fluids (industrial flow) and sales of concrete vibrators and gas meter radios to unique markets (specialty products). The Company estimates that over 75% of its products are used in water applications when all categories are grouped products). The Company estimates that over 75% of its products are used in water applications when all categories are grouped together. together. The core competency of the Company is flow measurement solutions. The Company is a leading innovator, Market Overview, Products, Systems and Solutions manufacturer and marketer of flow measurement and control products, serving water and gas utilities, municipalities and industrial customers worldwide. Measuring a wide variety of liquids ranging from water and oil to lubricants in industrial processes, the Company's products are known for their high degree of accuracy, long-lasting durability and ability to provide valuable and timely measurement information to customers. The Company's product lines fall into three categories: sales of water meters and related technologies to municipal water utilities (municipal water), sales of meters to various industries for water and other fluids (industrial flow) and sales of concrete vibrators and gas meter radios to unique markets (specialty products). The Company estimates that over 75% of its products are used in water applications when all categories are grouped Municipal water, the largest category by sales volume, includes water meters and related technologies and services Municipal water, the largest category by sales volume, includes water meters and related technologies and services used by water utilities as the basis for generating water and wastewater revenues. The key market for the Company's water used by water utilities as the basis for generating water and wastewater revenues. The key market for the Company's water meter products is North America, primarily the United States, because the meters are designed and manufactured to conform to meter products is North America, primarily the United States, because the meters are designed and manufactured to conform to standards promulgated by the American Water Works Association. Sales of water meters and related technologies and services standards promulgated by the American Water Works Association. Sales of water meters and related technologies and services are commonly referred to as residential or commercial water meter sales, the latter referring to larger sizes of meters. are commonly referred to as residential or commercial water meter sales, the latter referring to larger sizes of meters. Industrial flow includes products sold worldwide to measure and control materials flowing through a pipe or pipeline Industrial flow includes products sold worldwide to measure and control materials flowing through a pipe or pipeline including water, air, steam, oil, and other liquids and gases. These meters and valves are used in a variety of applications, such including water, air, steam, oil, and other liquids and gases. These meters and valves are used in a variety of applications, such as water/wastewater; heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC); oil and gas; chemical and petrochemical; food and as water/wastewater; heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC); oil and gas; chemical and petrochemical; food and beverage; and pharmaceutical production. beverage; and pharmaceutical production. Municipal water, the largest category by sales volume, includes water meters and related technologies and services used by water utilities as the basis for generating water and wastewater revenues. The key market for the Company's water meter products is North America, primarily the United States, because the meters are designed and manufactured to conform to standards promulgated by the American Water Works Association. Sales of water meters and related technologies and services are commonly referred to as residential or commercial water meter sales, the latter referring to larger sizes of meters. concrete vibrators. concrete vibrators. Specialty products include sales of radio technology to natural gas utilities for installation on their gas meters, and Specialty products include sales of radio technology to natural gas utilities for installation on their gas meters, and Industrial flow includes products sold worldwide to measure and control materials flowing through a pipe or pipeline including water, air, steam, oil, and other liquids and gases. These meters and valves are used in a variety of applications, such as water/wastewater; heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC); oil and gas; chemical and petrochemical; food and For municipal water, residential and commercial water meters are generally classified as either manually read meters For municipal water, residential and commercial water meters are generally classified as either manually read meters or remotely read meters via radio technology. A manually read meter consists of a water meter and a register that gives a visual or remotely read meters via radio technology. A manually read meter consists of a water meter and a register that gives a visual meter reading display. Meters equipped with radio transmitters (endpoints) use encoder registers to convert the measurement meter reading display. Meters equipped with radio transmitters (endpoints) use encoder registers to convert the measurement data from the meter into an encrypted digital format which is then transmitted via radio frequency to a receiver that collects and data from the meter into an encrypted digital format which is then transmitted via radio frequency to a receiver that collects and formats the data appropriately for water utility billing systems. Mobile systems, referred to as automatic meter reading (AMR) formats the data appropriately for water utility billing systems. Mobile systems, referred to as automatic meter reading (AMR) systems, have been the primary technology deployed by water utilities over the past two decades, providing accurate and cost- systems, have been the primary technology deployed by water utilities over the past two decades, providing accurate and cost- effective billing data. In an AMR system, a vehicle equipped for meter reading purposes, including a radio receiver, computer effective billing data. In an AMR system, a vehicle equipped for meter reading purposes, including a radio receiver, computer and reading software, collects the data from the utility's meters. and reading software, collects the data from the utility's meters. Specialty products include sales of radio technology to natural gas utilities for installation on their gas meters, and For municipal water, residential and commercial water meters are generally classified as either manually read meters or remotely read meters via radio technology. A manually read meter consists of a water meter and a register that gives a visual meter reading display. Meters equipped with radio transmitters (endpoints) use encoder registers to convert the measurement data from the meter into an encrypted digital format which is then transmitted via radio frequency to a receiver that collects and formats the data appropriately for water utility billing systems. Mobile systems, referred to as automatic meter reading (AMR) systems, have been the primary technology deployed by water utilities over the past two decades, providing accurate and cost- effective billing data. In an AMR system, a vehicle equipped for meter reading purposes, including a radio receiver, computer and reading software, collects the data from the utility's meters. 2 2 2 Fixed network advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) systems continue to build interest among water utilities. These systems incorporate a network of permanent data collectors or gateway receivers that are always active or listening for the radio transmission from the utilities' meters. AMI systems eliminate the need for utility personnel to drive through service territories to collect meter reading data. These systems provide the utilities with more frequent and diverse data from the utilities' meters at specified intervals. In 2011, the Company introduced what it believes will be the next generation of metering technology, advanced metering analytics (AMA), along with a host of automated utility management tools to facilitate the ability of water and gas utilities to increase their productivity and revenue, as well as proactively utilize their data. AMA is comprised of ReadCenter® Analytics software coupled with ORION® SE two-way fixed network or GALAXY® one-way fixed network technology, which is complemented by a family of highly accurate and reliable water meters. The ORION SE system can operate as a mobile AMR system, a fixed network AMI system, or both. For example, a water or gas utility can begin deployment in mobile mode and migrate to a fixed network system. Also, if the system is operating in fixed network mode and the collector network goes down, the system will automatically revert to mobile mode, allowing the utility to continue collecting readings. Once the collector network is back up, it will automatically revert back to its fixed network mode. By using AMA, utilities will be able to proactively manage their day-to-day operations through powerful analytics-based software and a fixed network meter reading system. The Company's net sales and corresponding net earnings depend on unit volume and product mix, with the Company generally earning higher margins on meters equipped with radio technology. In addition to selling its proprietary radio products, including the ORION radio technologies and GALAXY AMI/AMA system, the Company also remarkets the Itron® radio products under a license and distribution agreement with Itron. The Company's proprietary radio products generally result in higher margins than the remarketed, non-proprietary technology products. The Company also sells registers and endpoints separately to customers who wish to upgrade their existing meters in the field. The proprietary ORION endpoint technology has been licensed to other technology providers on a non-exclusive basis, including those providing radio products that communicate over power lines, broadband networks, and proprietary radio frequency networks, allowing ORION a distinct advantage in the radio solutions market. In addition, the ORION universal gateway receiver transmits data over a variety of public wireless networks, which allows for strategic deployments, such as monitoring large commercial users. Water meter replacement and the adoption and deployment of new technology comprise the majority of water meter product sales, including radio products. To a much lesser extent, housing starts also contribute to the new product sales base. Over the last decade, there has been a growing trend in the conversion from manually read water meters to radio technology. This conversion rate is accelerating and contributes to an increased water meter and radio solutions base of business. The Company estimates that less than 30 percent of water meters installed in the United States have been converted to a radio solutions technology. The Company's strategy is to fulfill customers' metering expectations and requirements with its proprietary meter reading systems or other systems available through its alliance partners in the marketplace. Industrial flow and specialty products serve niche flow measurement and control applications across a broad industrial spectrum. Specialized communication protocols that control the entire flow measurement process drive these markets. The Company's specific flow measurement and control applications and technologies serve the flow measurement market through both customized and standard precision flow measurement technologies. The Company's products are primarily manufactured and assembled in the Company's Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Racine, Wisconsin; Tulsa, Oklahoma; Scottsdale, Arizona; Nogales, Mexico; Neuffen, Germany; Brno, Czech Republic; and Bern, Switzerland facilities. The Company's products are sold throughout the world through employees, resellers and representatives. Depending on the customer mix, there can be a moderate seasonal impact on sales, primarily relating to higher sales of certain municipal water products during the spring and summer months. No single customer accounts for more than 10 percent of the Company's sales. 3 Competition There are competitors in each category in which the Company sells its products, and the competition varies from moderate to intense. Major competitors for utility water meters include Sensus USA Inc., Neptune Technology Group, Inc., Elster AMCO Metering, LLC and Master Meter, Inc. The Company's primary competitors for water utility radio products are Itron, Inc., Neptune Technology Group, Inc. and Sensus USA Inc. While the Company sells its own proprietary radio systems (ORION and GALAXY), it is also a reseller of the Itron products. A number of the Company's competitors in certain markets have greater financial resources than the Company. However, the Company believes it currently provides the leading technology in water meters and radio water systems. As a result of significant research and development activities, the Company enjoys favorable patent positions and trade secret protections for several of its technologies and products. There are many competitors in the industrial flow and specialty products markets due to the various markets and applications being served. For example, major competitors in the industrial flow markets include Emerson Electric Company, Krohne Messtechnik GmbH, Endress & Hauser Management AG, and Yokogawa Electric Corporation. In the HVAC market, the key competitor is Onicon Inc. In upstream oil and gas, Cameron International Corporation is the primary competitor. The Company competes with AW-Lake Company in the measurement of on-machine hydraulic fluids. With the acquisition of Racine Federated, Inc. in January 2012, the Company has a large portfolio of metering technology to compete in these markets. Backlog The Company's total backlog of unshipped orders at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $34.8 million and $33.4 million, respectively. The backlog is comprised of firm orders and signed contractual commitments, or portions of such commitments, that call for shipment within 12 months. Backlog can be significantly affected by the timing of orders for large projects and the amounts can vary due to the timing of work performed. Raw Materials Raw materials used in the manufacture of the Company's products include purchased castings made of metal or alloys (such as brass, which uses copper as its main component, aluminum, stainless steel and cast iron), plastic resins, glass, microprocessors and other electronic subassemblies and components. There are multiple sources for these raw materials, but the Company relies on single suppliers for certain brass castings and certain electronic subassemblies. The Company believes these items would be available from other sources, but that the loss of certain suppliers would result in a higher cost of materials, delivery delays, short-term increases in inventory and higher quality control costs in the short term. The Company carries business interruption insurance on key suppliers. The Company's purchases of raw materials are based on production schedules, and as a result, inventory on hand is generally not exposed to price fluctuations. World commodity markets and currency exchange rates may also affect the prices of material purchased in the future. The Company does not hold significant amounts of precious metals. Research and Development Expenditures for research and development activities relating to the development of new products, the improvement of existing products and manufacturing process improvements were $9.6 million in 2012 compared to $8.1 million in 2011 and $7.2 million in 2010. Research and development activities are primarily sponsored by the Company. The Company also engages in some joint research and development with other companies. Intangible Assets The Company owns or controls several trade secrets and many patents, trademarks and trade names in the United States and other countries that relate to its products and technologies. No single patent, trademark, trade name or trade secret is material to the Company's business as a whole. 4 Environmental Protection The Company is subject to contingencies related to environmental laws and regulations. The Company is named as one of many potentially responsible parties in two landfill lawsuits. The landfill sites are impacted by the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and other environmental laws and regulations. At this time, the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations, either from a cash flow perspective or on the financial statements as a whole. This belief is based on the Company's assessment of its limited past involvement with these landfill sites as well as the substantial involvement of and government focus on other named third parties with these landfill sites. However, due to the inherent uncertainties of such proceedings, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any of these matters. A future change in circumstances with respect to these specific matters or with respect to sites formerly or currently owned or operated by the Company, off-site disposal locations used by the Company, and property owned by third parties that is near such sites, could result in future costs to the Company and such amounts could be material. Expenditures for compliance with environmental control provisions and regulations during 2012, 2011 and 2010 were not material. Employees The Company and its subsidiaries employed 1,366 persons at December 31, 2012, 133 of whom are covered by a collective bargaining agreement with District 10 of the International Association of Machinists. The Company is currently operating under a five-year contract with the union, which expires on October 31, 2016. The Company believes it has good relations with the union and all of its employees. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Executive Officers of the Registrant. Name Position Richard A. Meeusen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Richard E. Johnson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Senior Vice President — Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Fred J. Begale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice President — Engineering William R. A. Bergum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice President — General Counsel and Secretary Gregory M. Gomez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice President — Business Development Horst E. Gras . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice President — International Operations Raymond G. Serdynski . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice President — Manufacturing Beverly L. P. Smiley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice President — Controller Kimberly K. Stoll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice President — Sales and Marketing Dennis J. Webb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice President — Customer Solutions Age at 2/29/2013 58 58 48 48 48 57 56 63 46 65 There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers. Officers are elected annually at the first meeting of the Board of Directors held after each annual meeting of the shareholders. Each officer holds office until his or her successor has been elected or until his or her death, resignation or removal. There is no arrangement or understanding between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which he or she was elected as an officer. Mr. Meeusen has served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer for more than five years. Mr. Johnson has served as Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for more than five years. Mr. Begale was elected Vice President - Engineering in December 2010. Mr. Begale served as Vice President - Business Development from April 2009 to December 2010, and Director - Business Development from March 2007 to April 2009. Mr. Bergum has served as Vice President - General Counsel and Secretary for more than five years. Mr. Gomez was elected Vice President - Business Development in December 2010. Mr. Gomez served as Vice President - Engineering from February 2008 to December 2010, and Director of Engineering from July 2007 to February 2008. Mr. Gras has served as Vice President - International Operations for more than five years. 5 Mr. Serdynski was elected Vice President - Manufacturing in February 2008. Mr. Serdynski served as Director of Manufacturing Operations prior to that. Ms. Smiley has served as Vice President - Controller for more than five years. Ms. Stoll was elected Vice President - Sales and Marketing in February 2012. Ms. Stoll served as Vice President - Marketing from April 2009 to February 2012, and served as Director - Utility Marketing from August 2008 to April 2009. Prior to August 2008, Ms. Stoll was Marketing Manager at Dorner Manufacturing from April 2007 to June 2008. Mr. Webb was elected Vice President - Customer Solutions in February 2012. Mr. Webb served as Vice President - Sales from April 2009 to February 2012, and Vice President - Sales and Marketing from February 2008 to April 2009. Mr. Webb served as Vice President - Sales, Marketing and Engineering prior to that. Foreign Operations and Export Sales The Company distributes its products through employees, resellers and representatives throughout the world. Additionally, the Company has a sales, distribution and manufacturing facility in Neuffen, Germany; sales and customer service offices in Mexico, Singapore, China and Slovakia; manufacturing facilities in Nogales, Mexico; and manufacturing and sales facilities in Brno, Czech Republic and Bern, Switzerland. The Company exports products from the United States that are manufactured in Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Racine, Wisconsin; Tulsa, Oklahoma and Scottsdale, Arizona. Information about the Company's foreign operations and export sales is included in Note 10 “Industry Segment and Geographic Areas” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Financial Information about Industry Segments The Company operates in one industry segment as an innovator, manufacturer and marketer of products incorporating flow measurement and control technologies as described in Note 10 “Industry Segment and Geographic Areas” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider the significant business risks described below in addition to the other information set forth or incorporated by reference in this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the “Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” at the front of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of the events contemplated by the following risks actually occur, our financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. The following list of risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a continually changing business, economic and geopolitical environment, and new risk factors may emerge from time to time. We can neither predict these new risk factors with certainty nor assess the precise impact, if any, on our business, or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may adversely impact our results of operations. While there is much uncertainty, we do analyze the risks we face, perform a probability assessment of their impacts and attempt to soften their potential impact when and if possible. Competitive pressures in the marketplace could decrease our revenues and profits. Competitive pressures in the marketplace for our products could adversely affect our competitive position, leading to a possible loss of market share or a decrease in prices, either of which could result in decreased revenues and profits. We operate in an environment where competition varies from moderate to intense and a number of our competitors have greater financial resources. Our competitors also include alliance partners that sell products that do or may compete with our products, particularly those that provide radio solutions. The principal elements of competition for our most significant product applications, residential and commercial water meters for the municipal water utility market (with various radio technology systems), are price, product technology, quality and service. The competitive environment is also affected by the movement toward radio technologies and away from manually read meters, the demand for replacement units and, to some extent, such things as global economic conditions, the timing and size of governmental programs such as stimulus fund programs, the ability of municipal water utility customers to authorize and finance purchases of our products, our ability to obtain financing, housing starts in the United States, and overall economic activity. For our industrial flow and specialty products, the competitive environment is affected by the general economic health of various industrial sectors particularly in the United States and Europe. 6 The inability to develop technologically advanced products could harm our future success. We believe that our future success depends, in part, on our ability to develop technologically advanced products that meet or exceed appropriate industry standards. Although we believe that we currently have a competitive advantage in this area, maintaining such advantage will require continued investment in research and development, sales, marketing and manufacturing capabilities. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient resources to make such investments or that we will be able to make the technological advances necessary to maintain such competitive advantage. If we are unable to maintain our competitive advantage, our future financial performance may be adversely affected. We are not currently aware of any emerging standards or new products that could render our existing products obsolete. The inability to obtain adequate supplies of raw materials and component parts at favorable prices could decrease our profit margins and negatively impact timely delivery to customers. We are affected by the availability and prices for raw materials, including purchased castings made of metal or alloys (such as brass, which uses copper as its main component, aluminum, stainless steel and cast iron), plastic resins, glass, microprocessors and other electronic subassemblies, and components that are used in the manufacturing process. The inability to obtain adequate supplies of raw materials and component parts for our products at favorable prices could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations by decreasing profit margins and by negatively impacting timely deliveries to customers. In the past, we have been able to offset increases in raw materials and component parts by increased sales prices, active materials management, product engineering programs and the diversity of materials used in the production processes. However, we cannot be certain that we will be able to accomplish this in the future. Since we do not control the actual production of these raw materials and component parts, there may be delays caused by an interruption in the production of these materials for reasons that are beyond our control. World commodity markets and inflation may also affect raw material and component part prices. New regulations related to conflict minerals may force us to incur additional expenses. The Securities and Exchange Commission recently adopted additional disclosure requirements related to certain minerals sourced from the Democratic Republic of Congo and surrounding countries, or “conflict minerals,” that are necessary to the functionality of a product manufactured, or contracted to be manufactured, by a Securities and Exchange Commission reporting company. The minerals that the final rules cover are commonly referred to as “3TG” and include tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold. Implementation of the new disclosure requirements could affect the sourcing and availability of some of the materials that we use in the manufacture of our products. Our supply chain is complex, and if we are not able to conclusively verify the origins for all conflict minerals used in our products or that our products are “conflict free,” then we may face reputational challenges with customers or investors. We could also incur significant costs related to the compliance process, including potential difficulty or added costs in satisfying the disclosure requirements. Economic conditions could cause a material adverse impact on our sales and operating results. As a supplier of products, the majority of which are to water utilities, we may be adversely affected by global economic conditions and delays in governmental programs created to stimulate the economy that affect our customers, including independent distributors, large city utilities, private water companies and numerous smaller municipal water utilities. These customers may delay capital projects, including non-critical maintenance and upgrades, or may not have the ability to authorize and finance purchases during economic downturns or instability in world markets. We also sell products for other applications to reduce our dependency on the municipal water market. A significant downturn in this market could cause a material adverse impact on sales and operating results. Therefore, a downturn in general economic conditions, as well as in the municipal water market, and delays in the timing or amounts of possible economic stimulus fund programs or the availability of funds to municipalities could result in a reduction in demand for our products and services and could harm the business. Failure to manufacture quality products could have a material adverse effect on our business. If we fail to maintain and enforce quality control and testing procedures, our products will not meet required performance standards. Product quality and performance are a priority for us since our products are used in various applications where precise control of fluids is essential. Although we believe we have a very good reputation for product quality, any future production and/or sale of substandard products would seriously harm our reputation, resulting in both a loss of current customers to competitors and damage to our ability to attract new customers. In addition, if any of our products prove to be defective, we may be required to participate in a recall involving such products. A successful claim brought against us with respect to a defective product in excess of available insurance coverage, if any, or a requirement to participate in a major product recall, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. 7 Litigation against us could be costly, time consuming to defend and could adversely affect our profitability. From time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. For example, we may be subject to workers' compensation claims, employment/labor disputes, customer and supplier disputes, product liability claims, intellectual property disputes and contractual disputes related to warranties arising out of the conduct of our business. Litigation may result in substantial costs and may divert management's attention and resources, which could adversely affect our profitability or financial condition. Changes in environmental or regulatory requirements could entail additional expenses that could decrease our profitability. We cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future environmental or regulatory requirements to which our operations might be subject or the manner in which existing or future laws will be administered or interpreted. Compliance with such laws or regulations may entail additional expenses that could decrease profitability. We are subject to a variety of environmental laws, such as lead content in certain meters incorporating brass housings, and regulatory laws affecting the use and/or licensing of radio frequencies necessary for radio products, as well as regulations related to customs and trade practices. Currently, the cost of complying with existing laws is included as part of our on-going expenses and does not have a material effect on our business or financial position, but a change in the future could adversely affect our profitability. Risks related to foreign markets could decrease our profitability. Since we sell products worldwide as well as manufacture products in several countries, we are subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. These risks include such things as changes in foreign currency exchange rates, changes in a specific country's or region's political or economic conditions, potentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws or regulatory requirements, differing labor regulations, and the difficulty of managing widespread operations. An inability to attract and retain skilled employees could negatively impact our growth and decrease our profitability. Our success depends on our continued ability to identify, attract, develop and retain skilled personnel throughout our organization. Current and future compensation arrangements, including benefits, may not be sufficient to attract new employees or retain existing employees, which may hinder our growth. Rising healthcare and retirement benefit costs could increase cost pressures and decrease our profitability. We estimate liabilities and expenses for retirement plans and other postretirement benefits that require the use of assumptions relating to the rates used to discount the future estimated liability, rate of return on any assets and various assumptions related to the age and cost of the workforce. Actual results may differ from the estimates and have a material adverse effect on future results of operations or on the financial statements as a whole. Rising healthcare and retirement benefit costs in the United States may also add to cost pressures and decrease our profitability. A failure to maintain good corporate governance practices could damage our reputation and adversely affect our future success. We have a history of good corporate governance, including procedures and processes that are required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules and regulations, such as board committee charters, and a code of business conduct that defines how employees interact with our various stakeholders and addresses issues such as confidentiality, conflict of interest and fair dealing. Failure to maintain these corporate governance practices could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Failure to successfully integrate acquired businesses or products could adversely affect our operations. As part of our business strategy, we continue to evaluate and may pursue selected business or product acquisition opportunities that we believe may provide us with certain operating and financial benefits. If we complete any such acquisitions, they may require integration into our existing business with respect to administrative, financial, sales, marketing, manufacturing and other functions to realize these anticipated benefits. If we are unable to successfully integrate a business or product acquisition, we may not realize the benefits identified in our due diligence process, and our financial results may be negatively impacted. Additionally, significant unexpected liabilities may arise during or after completion of an acquisition. 8 ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES The principal facilities utilized by the Company at December 31, 2012 are listed below. The Company owns all such facilities in fee simple except as noted. The Company believes that its facilities are generally well maintained and have sufficient capacity for its current needs. Location Principal use Approximate area (square feet) Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing and offices Racine, Wisconsin, USA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing and offices Scottsdale, Arizona, USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing and offices Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing and offices Brno, Czech Republic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing and offices Neuffen, Germany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing and offices Nogales, Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing and offices Nogales, Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing and offices Bern, Switzerland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing and offices 323,500 134,000 (1) 23,000 (2) 59,500 27,800 21,500 140,000 41,300 1,100 (3) (1) Leased facility. Lease term expires December 31, 2025. (2) Leased facility. Lease term expires June 30, 2014. (3) Building is owned, but land is leased from the government. Lease term expires October 18, 2021. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS In the normal course of business, the Company is named in legal proceedings from time to time. There are currently no material legal proceedings pending with respect to the Company. The more significant legal proceedings are discussed below. Like other companies in recent years, the Company is named as a defendant in numerous pending multi-claimant/ multi-defendant lawsuits alleging personal injury as a result of exposure to asbestos, manufactured by third parties, and integrated into or sold with a very limited number of the Company's products. The Company is vigorously defending itself against these claims. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of these issues will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations, either from a cash flow perspective or on the financial statements as a whole. This belief is based in part on the fact that no claimant has proven or substantially demonstrated asbestos exposure caused by products manufactured or sold by the Company and that a number of cases have been voluntarily dismissed. The Company has been named as a defendant in one pending patent infringement lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges the Company and other parties infringed a patent on a metering data feature. The Company believes this claim is without merit and it is vigorously defending its interests. As part of its contracts, the Company indemnifies certain customers and alliance partners for intellectual property infringement claims on its products. Some of those types of parties are also named defendants in this lawsuit. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of this issue will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations, either from a cash flow perspective or on the financial statements as a whole. The Company is subject to contingencies related to environmental laws and regulations. Information about the Company's compliance with environmental regulations is included in Part I, Item 1 of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Environmental Protection.” ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. 9 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Information required by this Item is set forth in Note 11 “Unaudited: Quarterly Results of Operations, Common Stock Price and Dividends” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following information in Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such a filing. The following graph compares on a cumulative basis the yearly percentage change since January 1, 2007 in (a) the total shareholder return on the Common Stock with (b) the total return on the Russell 2000 Index, and (c) the total return of the peer group made up of 15 companies in similar industries and with similar market capitalization. The graph assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2006. It further assumes the reinvestment of dividends. The returns of each component company in the peer groups have been weighted based on such company's relative market capitalization. Comparison of Cumulative Total Return December 31 Badger Meter, Inc. Return % Cum $ Russell 2000 Index Return % Peer Group Cum $ Return % Cum $ 2007 $ $ $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 2008 (34.78)% 65.22 (33.78)% 66.22 (25.92)% 74.08 $ $ $ 2009 2010 39.11% 90.72 27.17% 84.22 13.47% 84.06 $ $ $ 12.55% 102.11 26.86% 106.84 24.87% 104.96 $ $ $ 2011 (32.27)% 69.15 (4.17)% 102.38 (2.85)% 101.97 $ $ $ 2012 63.98% 113.40 16.35% 119.12 38.16% 140.88 The Peer Group consists of A.O. Smith Corp. (AOS), Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI), CIRCOR International, Inc. (CIR), Colfax Corporation (CFX), ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE), Flow International Corporation (FLOW), Franklin Electric Co, Inc. (FELE), Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc. (FSYS), Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC), Lindsay Corporation (LNN), Measurement Specialties, Inc. (MEAS), MFRI, Inc. (MFRI), Mueller Water Products (MWA), Robbins & Myers, Inc. (RBN), and Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS). 10 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA BADGER METER, INC. BADGER METER, INC. Ten Year Summary of Selected Consolidated Financial Data Ten Year Summary of Selected Consolidated Financial Data (In thousands except per share data) (In thousands except per share data) 2012 2011 2012 2010 2011 2009 2010 2008 2009 2007 2008 2006 2007 2005 2006 2004 2005 2003 2004 2003 Years ended December 31, Years ended December 31, Operating results Operating results Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $319,660 262,915 Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $319,660 276,634 262,915 250,337 276,634 279,552 250,337 234,816 279,552 229,754 234,816 203,637 229,754 188,663 203,637 168,728 188,663 168,728 Research and development . . . . . . . . . . $9,857 Research and development . . . . . . . . . . 8,086 $9,857 7,164 8,086 6,910 7,164 7,136 6,910 5,714 7,136 5,458 5,714 5,343 5,458 4,572 5,343 6,070 4,572 6,070 Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earnings from continuing operations $43,471 before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,349 $43,471 44,438 27,349 42,333 44,438 39,555 42,333 29,325 39,555 27,489 29,325 25,664 27,489 20,325 25,664 15,658 20,325 15,658 Earnings from continuing operations . . $28,032 Earnings from continuing operations . . 19,161 $28,032 28,662 19,161 26,780 28,662 25,084 26,780 18,386 25,084 16,568 18,386 16,164 16,568 12,056 16,164 9,798 12,056 9,798 Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ n/a n/a $ n/a n/a n/a 7,390 n/a n/a 7,390 (1,929) n/a (9,020) (1,929) (2,911) (9,020) (2,423) (2,911) (2,221) (2,423) (2,221) Net earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $28,032 Net earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,161 $28,032 28,662 19,161 34,170 28,662 25,084 34,170 16,457 25,084 7,548 16,457 13,253 7,548 9,633 13,253 7,577 9,633 7,577 Earnings from continuing operations to sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earnings from continuing operations to sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.8% Per Common share Per Common share Basic earnings from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1.96 Basic earnings (loss) from Basic earnings (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . $ n/a Total basic earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total basic earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1.96 Diluted earnings (loss) from Diluted earnings (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1.95 Diluted earnings (loss) from Diluted earnings (loss) from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . $ n/a Total diluted earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total diluted earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1.95 Cash dividends declared: Cash dividends declared: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $0.66 Price range - high . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $48.60 Price range - high . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45.47 $48.60 Price range - low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $29.30 Price range - low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26.86 $29.30 Closing price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $47.41 Closing price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29.43 $47.41 Book value * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11.96 Book value * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.85 $11.96 Shares outstanding at year-end Shares outstanding at year-end 7.3% 8.8% 10.4% 7.3% 10.7% 10.4% 9.0% 10.7% 7.8% 9.0% 7.2% 7.8% 7.4% 7.2% 6.4% 7.4% 5.8% 6.4% 5.8% 1.28 $1.96 1.92 1.28 1.81 1.92 1.72 1.81 1.29 1.72 1.19 1.29 1.20 1.19 0.91 1.20 0.76 0.91 0.76 n/a $ n/a 1.28 $1.96 n/a n/a 1.92 1.28 0.50 n/a 2.31 1.92 n/a 0.50 1.72 2.31 (0.13) n/a 1.16 1.72 (0.65) (0.13) (0.22) (0.65) (0.18) (0.22) (0.17) (0.18) (0.17) 0.54 1.16 0.98 0.54 0.73 0.98 0.59 0.73 0.59 1.27 $1.95 1.91 1.27 1.79 1.91 1.69 1.79 1.26 1.69 1.15 1.26 1.15 1.15 0.89 1.15 0.75 0.89 0.75 n/a $ n/a 1.27 $1.95 0.60 $0.66 n/a n/a 1.91 1.27 0.52 0.60 45.49 45.47 32.58 26.86 44.22 29.43 11.19 11.85 0.49 n/a 2.28 1.91 0.46 0.52 44.90 45.49 22.50 32.58 39.82 44.22 9.65 11.19 n/a 0.49 1.69 2.28 0.40 0.46 62.74 44.90 17.58 22.50 29.02 39.82 7.50 9.65 (0.13) n/a 1.13 1.69 0.34 0.40 46.43 62.74 23.00 17.58 44.95 29.02 6.33 7.50 (0.63) (0.13) (0.20) (0.63) (0.18) (0.20) (0.17) (0.18) (0.17) 0.52 1.13 0.95 0.52 0.71 0.95 0.58 0.71 0.58 0.31 0.34 32.20 46.43 19.51 23.00 27.70 44.95 5.07 6.33 0.29 0.31 25.63 32.20 13.23 19.51 19.62 27.70 5.36 5.07 0.28 0.29 16.00 25.63 8.53 13.23 14.98 19.62 4.77 5.36 0.27 0.28 9.94 16.00 6.13 8.53 9.54 14.98 4.19 4.77 0.27 9.94 6.13 9.54 4.19 Common Stock ..................................... 14,314 Common Stock ..................................... 15,123 14,314 15,048 15,123 14,973 15,048 14,808 14,973 14,519 14,808 14,154 14,519 13,696 14,154 13,444 13,696 13,170 13,444 13,170 Financial position Financial position Working capital * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $27,294 Working capital * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78,782 $27,294 64,658 78,782 60,419 64,658 35,740 60,419 38,725 35,740 33,648 38,725 32,923 33,648 25,461 32,923 25,946 25,461 25,946 Current ratio * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3 to 1 Current ratio * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5 to 1 1.3 to 1 3.0 to 1 4.5 to 1 3.3 to 1 3.0 to 1 1.7 to 1 3.3 to 1 1.9 to 1 1.7 to 1 1.7 to 1 1.9 to 1 1.8 to 1 1.7 to 1 1.6 to 1 1.8 to 1 1.7 to 1 1.6 to 1 1.7 to 1 Net cash provided by operations. . . . . . $34,801 Net cash provided by operations. . . . . . 31,317 $34,801 18,396 31,317 36,588 18,396 26,143 36,588 27,934 26,143 16,750 27,934 18,361 16,750 6,297 18,361 15,221 6,297 15,221 Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $8,202 Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,336 $8,202 9,238 5,336 7,750 9,238 13,237 7,750 15,971 13,237 11,060 15,971 9,088 11,060 5,582 9,088 5,214 5,582 5,214 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $290.453 218,910 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $290.453 215,864 218,910 191,016 215,864 195,358 191,016 150,301 195,358 139,383 150,301 145,867 139,383 142,961 145,867 133,851 142,961 133,851 Short-term and current portion of long- term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term and current portion of long- $66,730 term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ n/a 1,790 $66,730 12,878 1,790 8,003 12,878 19,670 8,003 13,582 19,670 17,037 13,582 13,328 17,037 22,887 13,328 9,188 22,887 9,188 n/a $ n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 5,504 n/a 3,129 5,504 5,928 3,129 15,360 5,928 14,819 15,360 24,450 14,819 24,450 Shareholders' equity (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . $171,247 179,281 Shareholders' equity (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . $171,247 168,383 179,281 144,461 168,383 111,023 144,461 91,969 111,023 71,819 91,969 73,416 71,819 64,066 73,416 55,171 64,066 55,171 Debt as a percent of total debt and equity * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Debt as a percent of total debt and 28.0% equity * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0% 28.0% 7.1% 1.0% 5.2% 7.1% 18.5% 5.2% Return on shareholders' equity *. . . . . . 16.4% Return on shareholders' equity *. . . . . . 10.7% 16.4% 17.0% 10.7% 18.5% 17.0% 22.6% 18.5% Price/earnings ratio * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Price/earnings ratio * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.3 23.2 24.3 23.2 23.2 22.2 23.2 17.2 22.2 15.4% 18.5% 20.0% 22.6% 35.7 17.2 26.8% 15.4% 23.1% 20.0% 24.1 35.7 30.1% 26.8% 22.0% 23.1% 17.1 24.1 37.0% 30.1% 18.8% 22.0% 16.8 17.1 37.9% 37.0% 17.8% 18.8% 12.7 16.8 37.9% 17.8% 12.7 (1) The Company's French operations have been presented as discontinued operations through 2007, the years of ownership. In 2009, discontinued operations represented the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits for certain deductions that were taken on prior tax returns related to the shutdown of the Company's French operations. (1) The Company's French operations have been presented as discontinued operations through 2007, the years of ownership. In 2009, discontinued operations represented the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits for certain deductions that were taken on prior tax returns related to the shutdown of the Company's French operations. (2) The Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Standards Accounting Board Accounting Standards Codification 715, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits” on December 31, 2006, with respect to recognizing the funded status of pension and postretirement benefit plans, and at December 31, 2008, with respect to changing the measurement date. (2) The Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Standards Accounting Board Accounting Standards Codification 715, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits” on December 31, 2006, with respect to recognizing the funded status of pension and postretirement benefit plans, and at December 31, 2008, with respect to changing the measurement date. 11 11 * Description of calculations as of the applicable year end: Book value per share equals total shareholders' equity at year-end divided by the number of common shares outstanding. Working capital equals total current assets less total current liabilities. Current ratio equals total current assets divided by total current liabilities. Debt as a percent of total debt and equity equals total debt (the sum of short-term debt, current portion of long-term debt and long-term debt) divided by the sum of total debt and total shareholders' equity at year-end. The debt of the discontinued French operations is included in this calculation through 2007, the years of ownership, although there was no debt at the end of 2007 related to the French operations. Return on shareholders' equity equals earnings from continuing operations divided by total shareholders' equity at year-end. Price/earnings ratio equals the closing stock price for common stock divided by diluted earnings per share from continuing operations. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BUSINESS DESCRIPTION AND OVERVIEW The core competency of the Company is flow measurement solutions. The Company is a leading innovator, manufacturer and marketer of flow measurement and control products, serving water and gas utilities, municipalities and industrial customers worldwide. Measuring a wide variety of liquids ranging from water and oil to lubricants in industrial processes, the Company's products are known for their high degree of accuracy, long-lasting durability and ability to provide valuable and timely measurement information to customers. The Company's product lines fall into three categories: sales of water meters and related technologies to municipal water utilities (municipal water), sales of meters to various industries for water and other fluids (industrial flow) and sales of concrete vibrators and gas meter radios to unique markets (specialty products). The Company estimates that over 75% of its products are used in water applications when all categories are grouped together. Municipal water, the largest category by sales volume, includes water meters and related technologies and services used by water utilities as the basis for generating water and wastewater revenues. The key market for the Company's water meter products is North America, primarily the United States, because the meters are designed and manufactured to conform to standards promulgated by the American Water Works Association. Sales of water meters and related technologies and services are commonly referred to as residential or commercial water meter sales, the latter referring to larger sizes of meters. Industrial flow includes products sold worldwide to measure and control materials flowing through a pipe or pipeline including water, air, steam, oil, and other liquids and gases. These meters and valves are used in a variety of applications, such as water/wastewater; heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC); oil and gas; chemical and petrochemical; food and beverage; and pharmaceutical production. Specialty products include sales of radio technology to natural gas utilities for installation on their gas meters, and concrete vibrators. Additional information about the Company's business is described in Part 1, Item 1 “Business” under the heading “Market Overview, Products, Systems and Solutions” in this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Business Trends Increasingly, the electric utility industry relies on AMI technology for two-way communication to monitor and control electrical devices at the customer's site. Although the Company does not sell products for electric market applications, the trend toward AMI affects the markets in which the Company does participate, particularly for those customers in the water utility market that are interested in more frequent and diverse data collection. Specifically, AMI and AMA technologies enable water utilities to capture readings from each meter at more frequent and variable intervals. The Company sells its technology solutions to meet customer requirements. Since the technology products have comparable margins, any change in the mix between AMR, AMI or AMA is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's net sales related to meter reading technology. 12 There are approximately 53,000 water utilities in the United States and the Company estimates that less than 30 percent of them have converted to a radio solutions technology. Although there is growing interest in AMI and AMA communication by water utilities, the vast majority of utilities installing such technology continue to select AMR technologies for their applications. The Company's ORION technology has experienced rapid acceptance in the United States as an increasing number of water utilities have selected ORION as their AMR solution. The Company anticipates that even with growing interest in AMI and AMA, AMR will continue to be the primary product of choice for a number of years. For many water utilities, AMR technology is simply the most cost-effective solution available today. However, with the introduction of AMA, the Company believes it is well-positioned to meet customers' future needs. Acquisitions On January 31, 2012, the Company completed its acquisition of 100% of the outstanding common stock of Racine Federated, Inc. (“Racine Federated”) of Racine, Wisconsin and its subsidiary Premier Control Technologies, Ltd. (“PCT”) located in Thetford, England for approximately $57.3 million in cash, plus a working capital adjustment of $0.3 million. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company sold PCT for a nominal amount after the majority of its functions were absorbed by the Company's European subsidiary. The Company also merged Racine Federated into Badger Meter, Inc. on December 31, 2012. Racine Federated manufactures and markets flow meters for the water industry as well as various industrial metering and specialty products. These products complement and expand the Company's existing lines for the global flow measurement business. This acquisition is further described in Note 3 “Acquisitions” in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. On January 26, 2011, the Company purchased Remag, AG (“Remag”) of Bern, Switzerland for $4.9 million. Remag distributes a line of precision flow measurement products, some of which they manufacture, for the global industrial market. Their small turbine meters complement and expand the Company's existing line of industrial flow products. This acquisition is further described in Note 3 “Acquisitions” in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. On April 1, 2010, the Company purchased Cox Instruments, LLC (“Cox”) of Scottsdale, Arizona, and its subsidiary Flow Dynamics, Inc. for $7.8 million. Cox Instruments and Flow Dynamics manufacture and market precision high performance flow meters that are used in demanding applications such as aerospace, custody transfer and flow measurement test stands. The Company merged the two entities into a wholly-owned subsidiary named Cox Flow Measurement, Inc. on April 1, 2010, and merged the subsidiary into Badger Meter, Inc. on December 31, 2010. This acquisition is further described in Note 3 “Acquisitions” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Revenue and Product Mix Prior to the Company's introduction of its own proprietary radio products, for example ORION and GALAXY, Itron water utility-related products were a dominant radio products contributor to the Company's results. Itron products are sold under an agreement between the Company and Itron, Inc. that has been renewed multiple times and is in effect until early 2016. The Company's radio products directly compete with Itron water radio products. In recent years, many of the Company's customers have selected the Company's proprietary products over Itron products. While the Company's proprietary product sales are generally greater than those of the Itron licensed products, the Company expects that Itron products will remain a significant component of sales to water utilities. Continuing substantial sales in both product lines underscores the continued acceptance of radio technology by water utilities and affirms the Company's strategy of selling Itron products in addition to its own proprietary products. As the industry continues to evolve, the Company has been vigilant in anticipating and exceeding customer expectations. In 2011, the Company introduced AMA as a hardware and software solution for water and gas utilities, which it believes will help maintain the Company's position as a market leader. The Company continues to seek opportunities for additional revenue enhancement. For instance, the Company is periodically asked to oversee and perform field installation of its products for certain customers. The Company assumes the role of general contractor, hiring installation subcontractors and supervising their work. The Company also supports its product and technology sales with the sale of extended service programs that provide additional services beyond the standard warranty. In recent years, the Company has sold ORION radio technology to natural gas utilities for installation on their gas meters. With the exception of a large sale of gas radios to one particular customer, the revenues from such products and services are not yet significant and the Company is uncertain of the potential growth achievable for such products and services in future periods. 13 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Net Sales Net sales in 2012 increased $56.8 million, or 21.6%, to $319.7 million from $262.9 million in 2011. The overall increase was due to the inclusion of Racine Federated's net sales for eleven months of the year and higher municipal water sales, offset somewhat by lower sales of radios to natural gas utilities. Racine Federated's sales for the eleven months ended December 31, 2012 were $41.3 million. Municipal water sales increased $22.9 million, or 12.0%, to $213.2 million in 2012 from $190.3 million in 2011. These sales represented 66.7% of total net sales in 2012 compared to 72.4% in 2011. The sales increase was due to higher sales of residential meters sold with technology as well as higher commercial meter sales. Sales of meters with technology increased 11.6% for the year due to higher volumes of product sold. Sales of manually read residential meters were essentially flat between years. Commercial water meter sales increased 19.5% in 2012 compared to 2011 due to higher volumes of product sold. The Company believes the net overall increase for the year was due to normal buying patterns beginning to resume after a period where there were (and still are) negative factors affecting market conditions. These factors include lingering concerns about municipal spending, which have resulted in delayed buying decisions, and slower housing starts. In addition, the Company's introduction in 2011 of the next generation of the ORION product lengthened the sales cycle for water utilities as they evaluate this new technology. Weather may have also played a role as poor weather in the Midwest and Northeast had a negative impact on sales in early 2011 due to its effects on budget demands and installation rates, which did not recur in early 2012. Industrial flow products represented 29.0% of total net sales in 2012 compared to 21.5% in 2011. These sales increased $36.2 million, or 64.0%, to $92.8 million from $56.6 million in 2011. As previously noted, Racine Federated was acquired on January 31, 2012 and Racine Federated's sales were included from that point forward. Within this product grouping, Racine Federated's sales were $32.6 million. The remainder of the increase was due to higher sales in most of the remaining industrial flow product lines. Specialty products represented 4.3% of total net sales in 2012 compared to 6.1% in 2011. These sales decreased $2.3 million in 2012, or 14.4%, to $13.7 million from $16.0 million in 2011. Included in this product grouping was $8.7 million of sales from Racine Federated. Without these sales, specialty products would have shown a larger sales decrease due to lower sales of radios into the natural gas market. The 2011 sales included higher sales of radios to one particular natural gas customer that did not recur in 2012. International sales for municipal water meters and related technologies are generally made to customers in Canada and Mexico, which use similar mechanical technology and standards as customers in the U.S. International sales for industrial flow and specialty products are generally made throughout the world. In Europe, sales are made primarily in Euros. Other international sales are made in U.S. dollars or local currencies. International sales increased 53.8% to $48.6 million in 2012 from $31.6 million in 2011 primarily due to the addition of Racine Federated's product lines. Net sales in 2011 decreased $13.7 million, or 5.0%, to $262.9 million from $276.6 million in 2010. The overall decrease was the net result of lower volumes sold for the Company's municipal water products, offset somewhat by higher sales of industrial flow and specialty products. Higher prices in certain product lines also helped offset the lower municipal water product sales. Municipal water sales represented 72.4% of total net sales in 2011 compared to 79.4% in 2010. These sales decreased in 2011 by $29.2 million, or 13.3%, to $190.3 million from $219.5 million. The decline was due primarily to lower volumes of the Company's residential technology products, as well as lower sales of commercial and manually read residential meters, offset by somewhat higher prices in certain product lines. The Company believes the net decrease in municipal water sales was due to a continuation of certain factors, including concerns over municipal spending that continue to delay order decisions, slower housing starts and the Company's introduction in early 2011 of the next generation of the ORION product that caused water utilities to take time to evaluate this new technology. In addition, poor weather in the Midwest and Northeast had a negative impact on sales in early 2011 due to its effects on budget demands and installation rates. Industrial flow products represented 21.5% of total net sales in 2011 compared to 16.6% in 2010. These sales increased $10.7 million, or 23.3%, to $56.6 million in 2011 compared to $45.9 million in 2010. The increase was due in part to the addition of $3.3 million of sales from the acquisition of Remag, which was not included in the 2010 results. Most of the other industrial flow product line sales increased in 2011 over 2010. 14 Specialty products represented 6.1% of total net sales in 2011 compared to 4.0% in 2010. These sales increased $4.8 million in 2011, or 42.9%, to $16.0 million from $11.2 million in 2011. The increase was primarily due to a larger sale of gas radios to one particular natural gas customer in 2011. International sales increased 2.5% to $31.6 million in 2011 from $30.8 million in 2010 primarily due to higher industrial flow product sales of valves and electromagnetic meters in Europe as the global economy slowly recovers. Gross Margins Gross margins as a percentage of sales were 38.2%, 34.2% and 37.2% for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The percentage increase in 2012 was due in part to the addition of Racine Federated's products, whose margins are generally a higher percentage than the Company's overall weighted margin percentage. Margins also increased due to lower costs for castings which fluctuate with the metals market, and higher sales volumes in general which increase overall factory utilization. Offsetting these factors was the impact of lower sales of radios to natural gas utilities. Gross margins were lower in 2011 compared to 2010 due to significantly higher commodity costs, particularly copper, mitigated somewhat by higher prices charged for the Company's products as well as cost reductions as the Company began to transition additional operations to its Mexican facilities. This transition was completed in the second quarter of 2011. Approximately 70 positions were transferred from the Milwaukee facility to the Mexican facility as part of a plan to move production to lower-cost facilities. Operating Expenses Selling, engineering and administration expenses in 2012 increased $15.5 million, or 24.9%, over 2011's expenses. The increase was primarily attributable to the acquisition of Racine Federated and amortization of intangibles acquired, which were not included in the results for 2011. The remainder of the increase was due to higher employee incentives and normal inflationary increases, offset by continuing cost control measures. In addition, the 2012 amounts include a $1.0 million charge in connection with the write down of the Company's investment in an emerging technology company and a $1.1 million non- cash pension charge as a result of payouts from the pension plan occurring faster than the assumed rate. Selling, engineering and administration costs increased $4.3 million, or 7.4%, in 2011 compared to 2010. The increase was due in part to the inclusion of Remag's expenses which were not included in the 2010 amounts and expenses for the acquisition of Cox, which were included in results for only nine months of 2010. Other reasons for the increase include higher amortization of various intangibles and software as well as higher costs associated with the technical support of the Company's products. In addition, expenses for 2011 include approximately $1.1 million of charges associated with the acquisition of Racine Federated that was acquired on January 31, 2012 as well as a non-cash pension curtailment charge as a result of contract negotiations with the Company's only union in which the union agreed to freeze its defined benefit plan at December 31, 2011 and participate in the Company's defined contribution plan. The 2010 amounts include a one-time credit of $0.7 million for the fair value of land received in settlement of claims against a building contractor. Operating Earnings Operating earnings in 2012 increased $17.0 million, or 61.8%, to $44.5 million compared to $27.5 million in 2011, as a net result of the higher sales of municipal water and industrial flow products, offset somewhat by higher selling, engineering and administration expenses. In addition, lower costs of certain raw materials also contributed to the increased operating earnings. Operating earnings in 2011 decreased $17.3 million, or 38.6%, to $27.5 million compared to $44.8 million in 2010. The decrease was due to lower sales as a result of lower volumes of product sold, as well as increased selling, engineering and administration expenses. Interest Expense, Net Interest expense, net was $1.0 million in 2012 compared to $0.2 million in 2011. The increase was due primarily to higher borrowings in 2012 associated with the acquisition of Racine Federated and the Company's stock repurchase program. Interest expense, net was $0.2 million in 2011 compared to $0.4 million in 2010. The decrease was due primarily to lower borrowings in 2011. 15  Income Taxes Income taxes as a percentage of earnings before income taxes were 35.5%, 29.9%, and 35.5% for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The 2011 results include recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits for certain deductions that were taken on prior tax returns. These benefits total approximately $1.3 million and were recognized in earnings in 2011 due to the realization that such benefits became more likely than not upon the conclusion of an IRS audit of the Company's 2009 Federal income tax return. Without these benefits, the provision for income taxes as a percentage of earnings before income taxes for 2011 would have been 34.8%. The increase in 2012 from 2011 was due to less foreign income, which was taxed at lower rates. The decrease in the effective tax rate between 2011 and 2010 was due to the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits discussed above and higher foreign income taxed at lower rates. Earnings and Diluted Earnings Per Share As a result of the increased operating earnings, offset somewhat by a higher effective tax rate, net earnings were $28.0 million in 2012 compared to $19.2 million in 2011. On a diluted basis, earnings per share were $1.95 in 2012 compared to $1.27 in 2011. As a result of the lower operating earnings, mitigated somewhat by a lower effective tax rate, net earnings were $19.2 million in 2011 compared to $28.7 million in 2010. On a diluted basis, earnings per share were $1.27 in 2011 compared to $1.91 in 2010. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The main sources of liquidity for the Company are cash from operations and borrowing capacity. Cash provided by operations in 2012 was $34.8 million compared to $31.3 million in 2011. The increase in cash provided by operations in 2012 compared to 2011 was due to significantly higher earnings, offset by higher inventory balances and a pension plan contribution made in 2012. Receivables at December 31, 2012 were $45.6 million compared to $41.2 million in 2011. The increase was due in part to the addition of Racine Federated in 2012 and the resulting increase in sales. The Company believes its net receivables balance is fully collectible. Inventories at December 31, 2012 were $61.0 million compared to $49.4 million at December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the addition of Racine Federated in 2012 with the remainder due to the timing of purchases. Property, plant and equipment increased as a net result of capital expenditures and the acquisition of Racine Federated's property, plant and equipment, offset by depreciation expense. Capital expenditures totaled $8.2 million in 2012, $5.3 million in 2011 and $9.2 million in 2010. These amounts vary due to the timing of capital expenditures. The Company believes it has adequate capacity to increase production levels with minimal additional capital expenditures. Intangible assets increased to $58.4 million at December 31, 2012 from $33.7 million at December 31, 2011 primarily due to the acquisition of Racine Federated and the resulting valuation of its intangible assets, partially offset by amortization expense. Also, as a result of that acquisition, goodwill increased to $35.9 million at December 31, 2012 compared to $9.4 million at December 31, 2011. Short-term debt increased from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012 as the Company borrowed funds for its acquisition of Racine Federated and for its stock repurchase program. Cash generated from operations was used to pay down some of this debt in 2012. At the end of 2012, debt represented approximately 28.0% of the Company's total capitalization. The Company is in compliance with the financial covenants associated with the debt. None of the debt is secured by the Company's assets. Payables increased at December 31, 2012 to $15.6 million compared to $11.4 million at December 31, 2011. The 2012 amount includes $4.6 million owed to the sellers of Racine Federated that is to be paid July 31, 2013. The remainder of the increase was due to the timing of purchases. Accrued compensation and employee benefits increased $3.1 million between years primarily due to higher employee incentives. 16 Warranty and other after-sale costs decreased $0.7 million to $0.9 million at December 31, 2012 compared to $1.6 million at December 31, 2011. The 2011 amount included a reserve for a specific known issue that was resolved in 2012. Other accrued employee benefits decreased to $8.9 million at December 31, 2012 from $10.0 million at December 31, 2011 primarily due to payouts of certain deferred compensation amounts. Deferred income taxes (current assets and long-term liabilities) switched from a net asset of $5.7 million to a net liability of $4.8 million primarily due to the purchase of Racine Federated and the inclusion of its resulting temporary differences. The overall reduction in total shareholders' equity from $179.3 million at December 31, 2011 to $171.2 million at December 31, 2012 was the result of net earnings and stock options exercised, offset by dividends paid and $30.0 million of Common Stock repurchased and retired by the Company under a stock repurchase program. The Company's financial condition remains strong. In May 2012, the Company signed a new credit agreement which increased its principal line of credit from $90.0 million to $125.0 million with its primary lender for a three year period. The line will be permanently reduced by $16.7 million annually beginning in 2013. While the facility is unsecured, there are a number of financial covenants with which the Company is in compliance. The Company believes that its operating cash flows, available borrowing capacity, and its ability to raise capital provide adequate resources to fund ongoing operating requirements, future capital expenditures and the development of new products. The Company continues to take advantage of its local commercial paper market and carefully monitors the current borrowing market. The Company had $67.4 million of unused credit lines available at December 31, 2012. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS The Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements at December 31, 2012. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS In 2010, the Company restructured the outstanding debt of its Employee Savings and Stock Option Plan (the “ESSOP”) by loaning the ESSOP $0.5 million to repay a loan to a third party and loaning the ESSOP an additional $1.0 million to purchase additional shares of the Company's Common Stock for future 401(k) savings plan matches under a program that will expire on December 31, 2020. Under this program, the Company agreed to pay the principal and interest on the new loan amount of $1.5 million. The receivable from the ESSOP and the related obligation were therefore netted to zero on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011. The terms of the loan call for equal payments of principal with the final payment due on December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2012, $1.2 million of the loan balance remains. The following table includes the Company's significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012. There are no undisclosed guarantees. Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-6 years Beyond Payments due by period Short-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total contractual obligations . . . . . . . . . . $ 66,730 14,061 80,791 $ $ 66,730 1,788 68,518 (In thousands) $ — $ 3,729 3,729 $ $ — $ 975 975 $ — 7,569 7,569 Other than items included in the preceding table, as of December 31, 2012, the Company had no additional material purchase obligations other than those created in the ordinary course of business related to inventory and property, plant and equipment, which generally have terms of less than 90 days. The Company also has long-term obligations related to its pension and postretirement plans which are discussed in detail in Note 7 “Employee Benefit Plans” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As of the most recent actuarial measurement date, the Company is not required to make a minimum contribution for its pension plan for the 2013 calendar year. Postretirement medical claims are paid by the Company as they are submitted, and they are anticipated to be $0.5 million in 2013 based on actuarial estimates; however, these amounts can vary significantly from year to year because the Company is self-insured. 17 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND USE OF ESTIMATES The Company's accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. As discussed in Note 1, the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company's more significant estimates relate primarily to the following judgmental reserves: allowance for doubtful accounts, reserve for obsolete inventories, warranty and after-sale costs reserve, and the healthcare reserve for claims incurred, but not reported. Each of these reserves is evaluated quarterly and is reviewed with the Company's Disclosure Committee and the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors. The basis for the reserve amounts is determined by analyzing the anticipated exposure for each account, and then selecting the most likely amount based upon historical experience and various other considerations that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These methods have been used for all years in the presented financials and have been used consistently throughout each year. Actual results may differ from these estimates if actual experiences vary from the Company's assumptions. The criteria used for calculating each of the reserve amounts vary by type of reserve. For the allowance for doubtful accounts reserve, significant past due balances are individually reviewed for collectibility, while the balance of accounts are reviewed in conjunction with applying historical write-off ratios. The calculation for the obsolete inventories reserve is determined by analyzing the relationship between the age and quantity of items on hand versus estimated usage to determine if excess quantities exist. The calculation for warranty and after-sale costs reserve uses criteria that include known potential problems on past sales as well as historical claim experience and current warranty trends. The healthcare reserve for claims incurred, but not reported is determined by using medical cost trend analyses, reviewing subsequent payments made and estimating unbilled amounts. The changes in the balances of these reserves at December 31, 2012 compared to the prior year were due to normal business conditions and are not deemed to be significant. While the Company continually tries to improve its estimates, no significant changes in the underlying processes are expected in 2013. The Company also uses estimates in four other significant areas: (i) pension and other postretirement obligations and costs, (ii) stock-based compensation, (iii) income taxes, and (iv) evaluating goodwill at least annually for impairment. The actuarial valuations of benefit obligations and net periodic benefit costs rely on key assumptions including discount rates and long-term expected returns on plan assets. The Company's discount rate assumptions for its pension and postretirement plans are based on the average yield of a hypothetical high quality bond portfolio with maturities that approximately match the estimated cash flow needs of the plans. The assumptions for expected long-term rates of return on assets for its pension plan are based on historical experience and estimated future investment returns, taking into consideration anticipated asset allocations, investment strategies and the views of various investment professionals. On December 31, 2010, the Company froze its pension plan for its non-union participants and formed a new defined contribution feature within the ESSOP plan in which each employee received a similar benefit. On December 31, 2011, the Company froze its pension plan for its union participants and included them in the same defined contribution feature within the ESSOP. The total cost of the Company's stock-based awards is equal to the grant date fair value per award multiplied by the number of awards granted, adjusted for forfeitures. Forfeitures are initially estimated based on historical Company information and subsequently updated over the life of the awards to ultimately reflect actual forfeitures, which could have an impact on the amount of stock compensation cost recognized from period to period. In calculating the provision for income taxes on an interim basis, the Company uses an estimate of the annual effective tax rate based upon the facts and circumstances known at each interim period. On a quarterly basis, the actual effective tax rate is adjusted as appropriate based upon the actual results compared to those forecasted at the beginning of the fiscal year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The reserve for uncertainty in income taxes is a matter of judgment based on an evaluation of the individual facts and circumstances of each tax position in light of all available evidence, including historic data and current trends. A tax benefit is recognized when it is “more likely than not” to be sustained based solely on the technical merits of each tax position. The Company evaluates and updates all of these assumptions quarterly. Goodwill impairment, if any, is determined by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value and is reviewed at least annually. Actual results may differ from these estimates. 18 OTHER MATTERS The Company is subject to contingencies related to environmental laws and regulations. The Company is named as one of many potentially responsible parties in two landfill lawsuits. The landfill sites are impacted by the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and other environmental laws and regulations. At this time, the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations, either from a cash flow perspective or on the financial statements as a whole. This belief is based on the Company's assessment of its limited past involvement with these landfill sites as well as the substantial involvement of and government focus on other named third parties with these landfill sites. However, due to the inherent uncertainties of such proceedings, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any of these matters. A future change in circumstances with respect to these specific matters or with respect to sites formerly or currently owned or operated by the Company, off-site disposal locations used by the Company, and property owned by third parties that is near such sites, could result in future costs to the Company and such amounts could be material. Expenditures for compliance with environmental control provisions and regulations during 2012, 2011 and 2010 were not material. Like other companies in recent years, the Company is named as a defendant in numerous pending multi-claimant/ multi-defendant lawsuits alleging personal injury as a result of exposure to asbestos, manufactured by third parties, and integrated into or sold with a very limited number of the Company's products. The Company is vigorously defending itself against these claims. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of these issues will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations, either from a cash flow perspective or on the financial statements as a whole. This belief is based in part on the fact that no claimant has proven or substantially demonstrated asbestos exposure caused by products manufactured or sold by the Company and that a number of cases have been voluntarily dismissed. The Company has been named as a defendant in one pending patent infringement lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges the Company and other parties infringed a patent on a metering data feature. The Company believes this claim is without merit and it is vigorously defending its interests. As part of its contracts, the Company indemnifies certain customers and alliance partners for intellectual property infringement claims on its products. Some of those types of parties are also named defendants in this lawsuit. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of this issue will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations, either from a cash flow perspective or on the financial statements as a whole. See the “Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” at the front of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for a discussion of risks and uncertainties that could impact the Company's financial performance and results of operations. MARKET RISKS In the ordinary course of business, the Company is exposed to various market risks. The Company operates in an environment where competition varies from moderate to intense. The Company believes it currently provides the leading technology in water meters and radio systems for water utilities. A number of the Company's competitors in certain markets have greater financial resources. Competitors also include alliance partners that sell products that do or may compete with our products, particularly those that provide radio solutions. In addition, the market's level of acceptance of the Company's newer products, such as the recently introduced AMA systems, may have a significant effect on the Company's results of operations. As a result of significant research and development activities, the Company enjoys favorable patent positions for several of its products. The Company's ability to generate operating income and to increase profitability depends somewhat on the general health of the United States and foreign economies, including to some extent such things as the length and severity of global economic downturns, the timing and size of governmental programs such as stimulus fund programs, the ability of municipal water utility customers to authorize and finance purchases of the Company's products, the Company's ability to obtain financing, housing starts in the United States, and overall industrial activity. In addition, changes in governmental laws and regulations, particularly laws dealing with the use of lead or rules affecting the use and/or licensing of radio frequencies necessary for radio products may impact the results of operations. These factors are largely beyond the Company's control and depend on the economic condition and regulatory environment of the geographic region of the Company's operations. 19 The Company relies on single suppliers for certain castings and components in several of its product lines. Although alternate sources of supply exist for these items, the loss of certain suppliers could temporarily disrupt operations in the short term. The Company attempts to mitigate these risks by working closely with key suppliers, purchasing minimal amounts from alternative suppliers and by purchasing business interruption insurance where appropriate. Raw materials used in the manufacture of the Company's products include purchased castings made of metal or alloys (such as brass, which uses copper as its main component, aluminum, stainless steel and cast iron), plastic resins, glass, microprocessors and other electronic subassemblies and components. The Company does not hold significant amounts of precious metals. The price and availability of raw materials is influenced by economic and industry conditions, including supply and demand factors that are difficult to anticipate and cannot be controlled by the Company. Commodity risk is managed by keeping abreast of economic conditions and locking in purchase prices for quantities that correspond to the Company's forecasted usage. The Company's foreign currency risk relates to the sales of products to foreign customers and purchases of material from foreign vendors. The Company uses lines of credit with U.S. and European banks to offset currency exposure related to European receivables and other monetary assets. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company's foreign currency net monetary assets were partially offset by comparable debt resulting in no material exposure to the results of operations. The Company believes the effect of a change in foreign currency rates will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations, either from a cash flow perspective or on the financial statements as a whole. The Company typically does not hold or issue derivative instruments and has a policy specifically prohibiting the use of such instruments for trading purposes. The Company's short-term debt on December 31, 2012 was floating rate debt with market values approximating carrying value. Future annual interest costs for short-term debt will fluctuate based upon short-term interest rates. For the short-term debt on hand on December 31, 2012, the effect of a 1% change in interest rates is approximately $0.7 million. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES OF MARKET RISK Information required by this Item is set forth in Part II, Item 7 “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the heading “Market Risks” in this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. 20 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA BADGER METER, INC. Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. The Company's management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 using the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As allowed by the Securities and Exchange Commission guidance, management excluded from its assessment Racine Federated, Inc., which was acquired in 2012 and constituted 24.8% and 33.7% of total and net assets, respectively as of December 31, 2012, and 13.0% and 26.9% of net sales and net income, respectively, for the year then ended. Based on this assessment, the Company's management believes that, as of December 31, 2012, the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria. Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and, as part of its audit, has issued an attestation report, included herein, on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. 21 BADGER METER, INC. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Badger Meter, Inc. We have audited Badger Meter, Inc.'s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Badger Meter, Inc.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. As indicated in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management's assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Racine Federated, Inc. which is included in the 2012 consolidated financial statements of Badger Meter, Inc. and constituted 24.8% and 33.7% of total and net assets, respectively as of December 31, 2012, and 13.0% and 26.9% of net sales and net income, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Badger Meter, Inc. also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Racine Federated, Inc. In our opinion, Badger Meter, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Badger Meter, Inc. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 and our report dated March 5, 2013, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Milwaukee, Wisconsin March 5, 2013 22 BADGER METER, INC. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Badger Meter, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Badger Meter, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Badger Meter, Inc. at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Badger Meter, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 5, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Milwaukee, Wisconsin March 5, 2013 23 BADGER METER, INC. Consolidated Balance Sheets December 31, 2012 2011 (Dollars in thousands) Current assets: Assets Cash. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,554 $ Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,584 Inventories: Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Work in process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,872 13,340 27,785 60,997 4,343 3,896 4,975 41,168 13,476 11,377 24,583 49,436 2,266 3,350 Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121,374 101,195 Property, plant and equipment, at cost: Land and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Machinery and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets, at cost less accumulated amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,919 51,090 92,751 152,760 (82,276) 70,484 58,351 4,314 — 35,930 8,011 49,840 87,077 144,928 (78,826) 66,102 33,680 6,259 2,309 9,365 Total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 290,453 $ 218,910 Current liabilities: Liabilities and shareholders’ equity Short-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 66,730 $ Payables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued compensation and employee benefits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warranty and after-sale costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income and other taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued non-pension postretirement benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued employee benefits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) Shareholders’ equity: Common Stock, $1 par; authorized 40,000,000 shares; issued 20,441,184 shares in 2012 and 21,292,030 shares in 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital in excess of par value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reinvested earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Employee benefit stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock, at cost; 6,127,155 shares in 2012 and 6,169,329 shares in 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total shareholders’ equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,551 9,821 881 1,097 94,080 1,086 8,692 6,489 8,859 20,441 41,755 155,694 (13,948) (1,234) (31,461) 171,247 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 290,453 $ 1,790 11,365 6,734 1,593 931 22,413 1,078 — 6,103 10,035 21,292 39,445 166,271 (14,566) (1,485) (31,676) 179,281 218,910 See accompanying notes. 24 BADGER METER, INC. Consolidated Statements of Operations Years ended December 31, 2012 2011 2010 (In thousands except per share amounts) Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, engineering and administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earnings before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for income taxes (Note 8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 319,660 $ 262,915 $ 197,414 122,246 77,777 44,469 998 43,471 15,439 173,095 89,820 62,286 27,534 185 27,349 8,188 28,032 $ 19,161 $ Earnings per share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Shares used in computation of earnings per share: 1.96 1.95 $ $ 1.28 1.27 $ $ Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impact of dilutive securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,332 67 14,399 14,971 78 15,049 276,634 173,810 102,824 58,001 44,823 385 44,438 15,776 28,662 1.92 1.91 14,906 100 15,006 See accompanying notes. 25 BADGER METER, INC. Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Net earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Other comprehensive income : Years ended December 31, 2012 2011 2010 (Dollars in thousands) 28,032 $ 19,161 $ 28,662 Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employee benefit funded status adjustment, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 393 225 28,650 $ (267) (1,162) 17,732 (282) 1,730 $ 30,110 See accompanying notes. 26 BADGER METER, INC. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Years ended December 31, 2012 2011 2010 (Dollars in thousands) Operating activities: Net earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 28,032 $ 19,161 $ 28,662 Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operations: Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contributions to pension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on legal settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncurrent employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in: Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liabilities other than debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investing activities: Property, plant and equipment additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisitions, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment in emerging technology company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,587 4,467 (551) (1,097) — 122 1,266 812 (4,743) (905) (188) 6,770 34,802 (8,202) (51,518) — — 7,144 2,347 (800) — — 4,704 1,470 (616) 42 (850) (1,285) 12,156 31,317 (5,336) (3,954) — — 6,704 1,755 1,981 (4,700) (740) 2,266 1,365 (3,777) (14,886) 55 (289) (10,266) 18,396 (9,238) (7,280) (1,500) (8,028) Net cash used for investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (59,720) (9,290) (26,046) Financing activities: Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repayments of long-term debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax benefit on stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,136 — (9,513) 382 297 Repurchase of Common Stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (30,000) Employee benefit stock purchase. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) in cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash — beginning of period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 477 26,779 (282) 1,579 4,975 (11,893) — (9,023) 236 190 — — 493 (19,997) (144) 1,886 3,089 Cash — end of period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,554 $ 4,975 $ 10,457 (5,429) (7,784) 362 525 — (1,000) 152 (2,717) 127 (10,240) 13,329 3,089 Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Cash paid during the year for: Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15,247 1,113 $ $ 10,308 324 $ $ 10,884 330 See accompanying notes. 27 BADGER METER, INC. Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity Years ended December 31, Common Stock at $1 par value* Capital in excess of par value Reinvested earnings Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) Employee benefit stock Treasury stock Total (In thousands except per share amounts) Balance, December 31, 2009. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21,210 $ 35,221 $ 135,225 $ (14,585) $ (585) $ (32,025) $ 144,461 — 28,662 — Net earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income: Employee benefit funded status adjustment (net of $(1,426) tax effect). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends of $0.52 per share. . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax benefit on stock options and dividends . . . . . ESSOP transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of treasury stock (27 shares) . . . . . . . . . . — — — — 49 — — — — Balance, December 31, 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,259 Net earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss): Employee benefit funded status adjustment (net of $835 tax effect) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends of $0.60 per share. . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax benefit on stock options and dividends . . . . . ESSOP transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of treasury stock (41 shares) . . . . . . . . . . — — — — 33 — — — — Balance, December 31, 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,292 Net earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income: Employee benefit funded status adjustment (net of $(247) tax effect) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends of $0.66 per share. . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax benefit on stock options and dividends . . . . . ESSOP transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — 37 — — — Shares purchased and retired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of treasury stock (42 shares) . . . . . . . . . . (888) — — — — 313 525 159 967 397 — — (7,786) — — — — — 37,582 — 156,101 19,161 — — — 202 190 53 1,134 284 39,445 — — — — 345 297 141 1,266 — 261 — — (8,991) — — — — — 166,271 28,032 — — (9,497) — — — — (29,112) — — — — — — — (951) — — — — — — — — — — 139 1,730 (282) — — — — — — (13,137) (1,536) (31,886) — (1,162) (267) — — — — — — — — — — — — 51 — — — — — — — — — — 210 (14,566) (1,485) (31,676) — 225 393 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 251 — — — — — — — — — — — — 215 28,662 1,730 (282) (7,786) 362 525 (792) 967 536 168,383 19,161 (1,162) (267) (8,991) 235 190 104 1,134 494 179,281 28,032 225 393 (9,497) 382 297 392 1,266 (30,000) 476 171,247 Balance, December 31, 2012. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 20,441 $ 41,755 $ 155,694 $ (13,948) $ (1,234) $ (31,461) $ * Each common share of stock equals $1 par value; therefore, the number of common shares is the same as the dollar value. See accompanying notes. 28 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Profile The core competency of the Company is flow measurement solutions. The Company is a leading innovator, manufacturer and marketer of flow measurement and control products, serving water and gas utilities, municipalities and industrial customers worldwide. Measuring a wide variety of liquids ranging from water and oil to lubricants in industrial processes, the Company's products are known for their high degree of accuracy, long-lasting durability and ability to provide valuable and timely measurement information to customers. The Company's product lines fall into three categories: sales of water meters and related technologies to municipal water utilities (municipal water), sales of meters to various industries for water and other fluids (industrial flow) and sales of concrete vibrators and gas meter radios to unique markets (specialty products). The Company estimates that over 75% of its products are used in water applications when all categories are grouped together. Municipal water, the largest category by sales volume, includes water meters and related technologies and services used by water utilities as the basis for generating water and wastewater revenues. The key market for the Company's water meter products is North America, primarily the United States, because the meters are designed and manufactured to conform to standards promulgated by the American Water Works Association. Sales of water meters and related technologies and services are commonly referred to as residential or commercial water meter sales, the latter referring to larger sizes of meters. Industrial flow includes products sold worldwide to measure and control materials flowing through a pipe or pipeline including water, air, steam, oil, and other liquids and gases. These meters and valves are used in a variety of applications, such as water/wastewater; heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC); oil and gas; chemical and petrochemical; food and beverage; and pharmaceutical production. Specialty products include sales of radio technology to natural gas utilities for installation on their gas meters, and concrete vibrators. Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Receivables Receivables consist primarily of trade receivables. The Company does not require collateral or other security and evaluates the collectability of its receivables based on a number of factors. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded for significant past due receivable balances based on a review of the past due items and the customer's ability and likelihood to pay, as well as applying a historical write-off ratio to the remaining balances. Changes in the Company's allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows: Balance at beginning of year Provision and reserve adjustments Write-offs less recoveries Reserve acquired Balance at end of year 2012. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 298 441 291 $ $ $ (In thousands) 138 91 227 $ $ $ (30) $ (274) $ (77) $ 82 (a) $ 40 (b) $ $ — 488 298 441 (a) The reserve increased $82,000 in 2012 related to the acquisition of Racine Federated, Inc. (“Racine Federated”). Refer to Note 3 “Acquisitions” for a description of the acquisition. (b) The reserve increased $40,000 in 2011 related to the acquisition of Remag AG. Refer to Note 3 “Acquisitions” for a description of the acquisition. 29 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. The Company estimates and records provisions for obsolete inventories. Changes to the Company's obsolete inventories reserve are as follows: Balance at beginning of year Net additions charged to earnings Disposals Balance at end of year (In thousands) 2012. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,680 2,775 2,042 $ $ $ 1,082 328 1,345 $ $ $ (882) $ (423) $ (612) $ 2,880 2,680 2,775 Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets by the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives of assets are: for land improvements, 15 years; for buildings and improvements, 10 — 39 years; and for machinery and equipment, 3 — 20 years. Long-Lived Assets Property, plant and equipment and identifiable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the related asset or group of assets, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and carrying value of the asset or group of assets. No adjustments were recorded as a result of these reviews during 2012, 2011 and 2010. Intangible Assets Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives ranging from 10 to 20 years. The Company does not have any intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives. Amortization expense recognized for the years ending December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $4.4 million, $2.3 million and $1.8 million, respectively. Amortization expense expected to be recognized is $4.7 million in each of the subsequent five years beginning with 2013. The carrying value and accumulated amortization by major class of intangible assets are as follows: December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 Gross carrying amount Accumulated amortization Gross carrying amount Accumulated amortization Technologies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Non-compete agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Trademarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer lists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Trade names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (In thousands) 43,828 $ 7,609 $ 31,928 $ 5,150 1,932 650 150 3,423 11,500 8,223 862 390 150 483 1,054 807 1,932 650 150 3,423 — 2,523 675 373 145 291 — 292 69,706 $ 11,355 $ 40,606 $ 6,926 Goodwill Goodwill is tested for impairment annually during the fourth fiscal quarter or more frequently if an event indicates that the goodwill might be impaired. Potential impairment is identified by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value. No adjustments were recorded to goodwill as a result of these reviews during 2012, 2011 and 2010. 30 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 Goodwill was $35.9 million, $9.4 million and $9.2 million at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increases were the result of the Racine Federated, Inc. of Racine, Wisconsin acquisition in 2012, the Remag, AG of Bern, Switzerland acquisition in 2011 and the Cox Instruments, LLC of Scottsdale, Arizona acquisition in 2010. These acquisitions are further described in Note 3 “Acquisitions.” Revenue Recognition Revenues are generally recognized upon shipment of product, which corresponds with the transfer of title. The costs of shipping are billed to the customer upon shipment and are included in cost of sales. A small portion of the Company's sales includes shipments of products combined with services, such as meters sold with installation. The product and installation components of these multiple deliverable arrangements are considered separate units of accounting. The value of these separate units of accounting is determined based on their relative fair values determined on a stand-alone basis. Revenue is generally recognized when the last element of the multiple deliverable is delivered, which corresponds with installation and acceptance by the customer. The Company also sells a small number of extended support service agreements on certain products for the period subsequent to the normal support service provided with the original product sale. Revenue is recognized over the service agreement period, which is generally one year. Warranty and After-Sale Costs The Company estimates and records provisions for warranties and other after-sale costs in the period in which the sale is recorded, based on a lag factor and historical warranty claim experience. After-sale costs represent a variety of activities outside of the written warranty policy, such as investigation of unanticipated problems after the customer has installed the product, or analysis of water quality issues. Changes in the Company's warranty and after-sale costs reserve are as follows: Balance at beginning of year Net additions charged to earnings 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,593 889 907 $ $ $ 719 1,592 552 (a) Costs incurred and adjustments (In thousands) $ $ $ (1,431) $ (888) $ (668) $ Reserve acquired Balance at end of year — — 98 $ $ (b) $ 881 1,593 889 (a) Included in the 2011 increase in the reserve was $0.6 million related to a specific product issue. (b) The reserve increased $98,000 in 2010 related to the acquisition of Cox Flow Measurement. Refer to Note 3 “Acquisitions” for a description of the acquisition. Research and Development Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred and amounted to $9.6 million, $8.1 million and $7.2 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Stock-Based Compensation Plans As of December 31, 2012, the Company has an Omnibus Incentive Plan under which 700,000 shares are reserved for restricted stock and stock options grants for employees as well as stock grants for directors as described in Note 5 “Stock Compensation.” The plan was approved in 2011 and replaced all prior stock-based plans except for shares and options previously issued under those plans. The Company recognizes the cost of stock-based awards in net earnings for all of its stock-based compensation plans on a straight-line basis over the service period of the awards. The Company estimates the fair value of its option awards using the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula, and records compensation expense for stock options ratably over the stock option grant's vesting period. The Company values restricted stock and stock grants for directors on the closing price of the Company's stock on the day the grant was awarded. Total stock compensation expense recognized by the Company was $1.3 million for 2012, $1.5 million for 2011 and $1.4 million for 2010. 31 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 Healthcare The Company estimates and records provisions for healthcare claims incurred but not reported, based on medical cost trend analyses, reviews of subsequent payments made and estimates of unbilled amounts. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at December 31 are as follows: Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Unrecognized pension and postretirement benefit plan liabilities, net of tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 1,584 (15,532) (13,948) $ 1,190 (15,756) (14,566) 2012 2011 (In thousands) Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Fair Value Measurements of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of cash, receivables and payables in the financial statements approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. Short-term debt is comprised of notes payable drawn against the Company's lines of credit and commercial paper. Because of its short-term nature, the carrying amount of the short-term debt also approximates fair value. Included in other assets is insurance policies on various individuals who were associated with the Company. The carrying amounts of these insurance policies approximates their fair value. Subsequent Events The Company evaluates subsequent events at the date of the balance sheet as well as conditions that arise after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued. The effects of conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet date are recognized in the financial statements. Events and conditions arising after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued are evaluated to determine if disclosure is required to keep the financial statements from being misleading. To the extent such events and conditions exist, if any, disclosures are made regarding the nature of events and the estimated financial effects for those events and conditions. For purposes of preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes to these financial statements, the Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the accompanying financial statements were issued. Note 2 Common Stock Common Stock and Rights Agreement The Company has Common Stock and also Common Share Purchase Rights that trade with the Common Stock. The Common Share Purchase Rights were issued pursuant to the shareholder rights plan discussed below. On February 15, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a shareholder rights plan and declared a dividend of one Common Share Purchase Right for each outstanding share of Common Stock of the Company payable to the shareholders of record on May 26, 2008. The plan was effective as of May 27, 2008. Each right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one share of Common Stock at a price of $200.00 per share, subject to adjustment. Subject to certain conditions, the rights are redeemable by the Company and are exchangeable for shares of Common Stock at a favorable price. The rights have no voting power and unless the rights are redeemed, exchanged or terminated earlier, they will expire on May 26, 2018. The rights are an embedded feature of the Company’s Common Stock and not a free-standing instrument, and therefore, do not require separate accounting treatment. 32 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 The Company’s Board of Directors has authorized a share repurchase program up to $30.0 million in shares of Common Stock in the open market for a period of 2 years ending February 10, 2014, if not terminated sooner. At December 31, 2012, 888,056 shares were repurchased aggregating $30.0 million, which completed this program. Stock Options Stock options to purchase 60,400, 137,720 and 98,700 shares of the Company’s Stock in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were not included in the computation of dilutive securities because the exercise price was greater than the average stock price for that period, and accordingly their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Note 3 Acquisitions On January 31, 2012, the Company completed its acquisition of 100% of the outstanding common stock of Racine Federated, Inc. of Racine, Wisconsin and its subsidiary Premier Control Technologies, Ltd. located in Thetford, England for approximately $57.3 million in cash, plus a working capital adjustment of $0.3 million. The purchase price included a final $4.6 million payment which is due on July 31, 2013 and is included in payables at December 31, 2012. Racine Federated manufactures and markets flow meters for the water industry as well as various industrial metering and specialty products. These products complement and expand the Company's existing lines for the global flow measurement business. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method, and accordingly, the results of operations are included in the Company's financial statements from the date of acquisition. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company sold PCT for a nominal amount after the majority of its functions were absorbed by the Company's European subsidiary. The Company also merged Racine Federated into Badger Meter, Inc. on December 31, 2012. The Company has finalized the allocation of the purchase price as of December 31, 2012 with the completion of its analysis of the fair value of inventories, property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, income tax liabilities and certain contingent liabilities. The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date: Assets acquired: Cash. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Liabilities assumed: Payables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Accrued compensation and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities assumed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ January 31, 2012 (In thousands) 1,529 5,230 7,603 164 247 3,772 29,100 26,565 74,210 2,920 1,785 11,457 451 16,613 The intangible assets acquired are primarily customer relationships and developed technology with an estimated average useful life of 10 and 15 years, respectively. 33 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 The following unaudited pro forma information combines historical results as if Racine Federated had been owned by the Company for the twelve month periods presented. 2012 2011 (In thousands except per share amounts) Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 323,516 $ 28,177 $ 1.96 $ 305,562 21,261 1.41 The pro forma results include amortization of the intangibles mentioned above, interest expense on debt incurred to finance the acquisition, the elimination of certain acquisition costs and the income tax effect on the pro forma adjustments. The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what would have occurred if the acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of each fiscal period presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results. On January 26, 2011, the Company purchased Remag AG of Bern, Switzerland for $4.9 million. Remag manufactures and markets a small plastic turbine meter used in HVAC and white goods. The Company included these products with its other industrial flow products. The Company’s purchase price allocation included $0.9 million of cash, plus approximately $0.4 million of receivables, $0.4 million of inventory, $0.3 million of other assets, $2.0 million of fixed assets, $1.8 million of intangibles, $0.2 million of goodwill and $1.1 million of liabilities. The Remag acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method, and accordingly, the results of operations were included in the Company's financial statements from the date of acquisition. The acquisition did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto. On April 1, 2010, the Company purchased Cox Instruments, LLC of Scottsdale, Arizona, and its subsidiary Flow Dynamics, Inc. for $7.8 million. Cox Instruments and Flow Dynamics manufacture and market precision high performance flow meters that are used in demanding applications such as aerospace, custody transfer and flow measurement test stands. The Company merged the two entities into a wholly-owned subsidiary named Cox Flow Measurement, Inc. on April 1, 2010, and merged the subsidiary into Badger Meter, Inc. on December 31, 2011. The Company’s purchase price allocation included $0.6 million of cash, plus approximately $0.7 million of receivables, $1.1 million of inventory, $0.3 million of fixed assets, $4.3 million of intangibles, $2.2 million of goodwill and $1.4 million of liabilities. The Cox Instruments acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method, and accordingly, the results of operations were included in the Company's financial statements from the date of acquisition. The acquisition did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto. Note 4 Short-term Debt and Credit Lines Short-term debt at December 31, 2012 and 2011 consisted of: 2012 2011 (In thousands) Notes payable to banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Commercial paper. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total short-term debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,300 63,430 66,730 $ $ 1,790 — 1,790 Included in notes payable to banks was $3.3 million outstanding in 2012 under a 4.0 million Euro-base revolving loan facility (U.S. dollar equivalent of $5.3 million at December 31, 2012) that does not expire, and which bore interest at 1.56%. In 2011, included in notes payable to banks was $1.6 million outstanding under a 4.0 million Euro-based revolving loan facility (U.S. dollar equivalent of $5.2 million at December 31, 2011) which bore interest at 2.52%. 34 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 On May 23, 2012, the Company signed a new credit agreement which increased its principal line of credit (increasing it from $90.0 million to $125.0 million) for a three year period. The line will be permanently reduced by $16.7 million annually beginning in 2013. The line was increased to meet short-term cash needs, if any, that may arise as the result of funding the acquisition of Racine Federated with cash, as well as any cash needs resulting from the $30.0 million stock repurchase program that began in the first quarter of 2012 and ended in the second quarter of 2012. The issuance of commercial paper may comprise a maximum of $70.0 million of the line of credit. Borrowings of commercial paper bore interest at 1.35% in 2012. While the facility is unsecured, there are a number of financial covenants in effect for the period with which the Company is in compliance. Under this agreement at December 31, 2012, the Company has $61.6 million available of the $67.4 million total available short-term credit lines. Note 5 Stock Compensation As of December 31, 2012, the Company has an Omnibus Incentive Plan under which 700,000 shares are reserved for restricted stock and stock options grants for employees as well as stock grants for directors. The plan was approved in 2011 and replaced all prior stock-based plans except for shares and options previously issued under those plans. As of December 31, 2012, there were 552,000 shares and 633,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock available for grant under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Company recognizes the cost of stock-based awards in net earnings for all of its stock-based compensation plans on a straight-line basis over the service period of the awards. The following sections describe the three types of grants in more detail. Stock Options The Company estimates the fair value of its option awards using the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula, and records compensation expense for stock options ratably over the stock option grant’s vesting period. Stock option compensation expense recognized by the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 related to stock options was $0.4 million compared to $0.4 million in 2011 and $0.5 million in 2010. 35 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 The following table summarizes the transactions of the Company’s stock option plans for the three-year period ended December 31, 2012: Options outstanding — Number of shares Weighted- average exercise price December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options exercised. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options outstanding — December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options exercised. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options outstanding — December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options exercised. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options outstanding — 264,010 $ $ 36,000 (48,760) $ 251,250 $ $ 31,500 (33,180) $ (4,480) $ 245,090 $ 45,100 $ (37,450) $ (5,160) $ December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247,580 Price range $7.00 — $31.41 (weighted-average contractual life of 2.7 years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69,920 Price range $31.42 — $38.41 (weighted-average contractual life of 8.4 years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109,960 Price range $38.42 — $52.81 (weighted-average contractual life of 6.0 years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67,700 Exercisable options — December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144,022 152,762 141,740 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 21.44 38.41 7.42 26.59 36.59 7.07 38.20 30.30 36.15 10.25 37.19 34.26 21.39 36.99 43.13 17.92 25.29 31.72 The following assumptions were used for valuing options granted in the years ended December 31: Per share fair value of options granted during the period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Volatility factor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted-average expected life in years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13.17 0.85% 1.77% 49.7% 5.3 $9.80 1.98% 1.48% 48.0% 2.3 2012 2011 36 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 The following table summarizes the aggregate intrinsic value related to options exercised, outstanding and exercisable as of and for the years ended December 31: 2012 2011 (In thousands) Exercised. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Exercisable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 950 3,371 2,316 $ $ $ 560 1,332 1,312 As of December 31, 2012, the unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options is approximately $1.0 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.1 years. Director Stock Grant Non-employee directors receive an annual award of $45,000 worth of shares of the Company’s Common Stock under the shareholder-approved 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Company values stock grants for directors on the closing price of the Company’s stock on the day the grant was awarded. The Company records compensation expense for this plan ratably over the annual service period beginning May 1. Director stock compensation expense recognized by the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $0.3 million in each year. As of December 31, 2012, the unrecognized compensation cost related to the director stock award that is expected to be recognized over the remaining 4 months is estimated to be approximately $0.1 million. Restricted Stock The Company periodically issues nonvested shares of the Company's Common Stock to certain eligible employees, generally with a three-year cliff vesting period contingent on employment. The Company values restricted stock on the closing price of the Company's stock on the day the grant was awarded. The Company records compensation expense for these plans ratably over the vesting periods. Nonvested stock compensation expense recognized by the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $0.9 million compared to $0.7 million in 2011 and $0.6 million in 2010. The fair value of nonvested shares is determined based on the market price of the shares on the grant date. Nonvested at December 31, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonvested at December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonvested at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nonvested at December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares Fair value per share 46,600 18,500 $ $ (15,800) $ (1,400) $ 47,900 28,650 $ $ (10,900) $ (2,350) $ 63,300 30,325 $ $ (17,900) $ (1,900) $ 73,825 $ 37.09 38.41 24.94 39.28 41.52 36.59 51.26 39.30 37.69 36.15 38.69 21.77 37.01 As of December 31, 2012, there was $1.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years. 37 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 Note 6 Commitments and Contingencies Commitments The Company leases equipment and facilities under non-cancelable operating leases, some of which contain renewal options. Total future minimum lease payments consisted of the following at December 31, 2012: 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (In thousands) 1,788 1,479 1,270 979 963 7,582 14,061 Total leases Total rental expense charged to operations under all operating leases was $2.7 million, $1.7 million and $1.5 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company makes commitments in the normal course of business. At December 31, 2012, the Company had various contractual obligations, specifically operating leases that totaled $14.1 million, of which $1.8 million is due in 2013 and the remainder due between 2014 and 2025. Contingencies In the normal course of business, the Company is named in legal proceedings. There are currently no material legal proceedings pending with respect to the Company. The more significant legal proceedings are discussed below. The Company is subject to contingencies related to environmental laws and regulations. The Company is named as one of many potentially responsible parties in two landfill lawsuits. The landfill sites are impacted by the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and other environmental laws and regulations. At this time, the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations, either from a cash flow perspective or on the financial statements as a whole. This belief is based on the Company's assessment of its limited past involvement with these landfill sites as well as the substantial involvement of and government focus on other named third parties with these landfill sites. However, due to the inherent uncertainties of such proceedings, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any of these matters. A future change in circumstances with respect to these specific matters or with respect to sites formerly or currently owned or operated by the Company, off-site disposal locations used by the Company, and property owned by third parties that is near such sites, could result in future costs to the Company and such amounts could be material. Expenditures for compliance with environmental control provisions and regulations during 2012, 2011 and 2010 were not material. Like other companies in recent years, the Company is named as a defendant in numerous pending multi-claimant/ multi-defendant lawsuits alleging personal injury as a result of exposure to asbestos, manufactured by third parties, and integrated into or sold with a very limited number of the Company's products. The Company is vigorously defending itself against these claims. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of these issues will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations, either from a cash flow perspective or on the financial statements as a whole. This belief is based in part on the fact that no claimant has proven or substantially demonstrated asbestos exposure caused by products manufactured or sold by the Company and that a number of cases have been voluntarily dismissed. 38 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 The Company has been named as a defendant in one pending patent infringement lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges the Company and other parties infringed a patent on a metering data feature. The Company believes this claim is without merit and it is vigorously defending its interests. As part of its contracts, the Company indemnifies certain customers and alliance partners for intellectual property infringement claims on its products. Some of those types of parties are also named defendants in this lawsuit. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, the Company does not believe the ultimate resolution of this issue will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations, either from a cash flow perspective or on the financial statements as a whole. The Company relies on single suppliers for most brass castings and certain electronic subassemblies in several of its product lines. The Company believes these items would be available from other sources, but that the loss of certain suppliers would result in a higher cost of materials, delivery delays, short-term increases in inventory and higher quality control costs in the short term. The Company attempts to mitigate these risks by working closely with key suppliers, purchasing minimal amounts from alternative suppliers and by purchasing business interruption insurance where appropriate. The Company reevaluates its exposures on a periodic basis and makes adjustments to reserves as appropriate. Note 7 Employee Benefit Plans The Company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan that covers substantially all U.S. employees who were employed at December 31, 2011. After that date, no further benefits will accrue in this plan. The Company also maintains supplemental non-qualified pension plans for certain officers and other key employees, and an ESSOP. For the frozen pension, benefits are based primarily on years of service and, for certain plans, levels of compensation. The Company also has certain postretirement healthcare benefit plans that provide medical benefits for certain U.S. retirees and eligible dependents. Employees are eligible to receive postretirement healthcare benefits upon meeting certain age and service requirements. These plans require employee contributions to offset benefit costs. Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, at December 31, 2012 that have not yet been recognized in net periodic benefit cost are as follows: Pension plans Other postretirement benefits (In thousands) Prior service cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net actuarial loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ 14,848 $ 193 491 Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, at December 31, 2012 expected to be recognized in net periodic benefit cost during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 are as follows: Prior service credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net actuarial loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Pension plans Other postretirement benefits (In thousands) — $ 530 $ 99 7 39 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 Qualified Pension Plan The Company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan (sometimes referred to as the “qualified pension plan”) for certain employees. On December 31, 2010, the Company froze the qualified pension plan for its non-union participants and formed a new defined contribution feature within the ESSOP plan in which each employee received a similar benefit. On December 31, 2011, the Company froze the qualified pension plan for its union participants and included them in the same defined contribution feature within the ESSOP. After December 31, 2011, employees receive no future benefits under the qualified pension benefit plan as benefits were frozen and the employees now receive a defined contribution in its place. Employees will continue to earn returns on their frozen balances. The following table sets forth the components of net periodic pension cost for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 based on a December 31 measurement date: Service cost — benefits earned during the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Interest cost on projected benefit obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Curtailment expense (income) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Settlement expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net periodic pension cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2012 2011 2010 (In thousands) 6 $ 464 $ 2,205 (3,190) — 645 — 1,075 2,415 (3,767) 196 1,698 984 — 741 $ 1,990 $ 1,857 2,473 (3,689) 66 1,660 (36) — 2,331 Actuarial assumptions used in the determination of the net periodic pension cost are: Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected long-term return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.69% 7.00% n/a 5.05% 7.75% 5.0% 5.55% 8.00% 5.0% 2012 2011 2010 The Company's discount rate assumptions for the qualified pension plan are based on the average yield of a hypothetical high quality bond portfolio with maturities that approximately match the estimated cash flow needs of the plan. The assumptions for expected long-term rates of return on assets are based on historical experience and estimated future investment returns, taking into consideration anticipated asset allocations, investment strategies and the views of various investment professionals. The use of these assumptions can cause volatility if actual results differ from expected results. 40 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 The following table provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status based on a December 31 measurement date: Change in benefit obligation: Benefit obligation at beginning of plan year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Projected benefit obligation at measurement date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets at beginning of plan year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Company contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fair value of plan assets at measurement date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2012 2011 (In thousands) 49,009 6 2,205 3,565 (4,085) 50,700 43,852 5,683 1,097 (4,085) 46,547 $ $ $ $ 50,416 464 2,415 1,021 (5,307) 49,009 49,537 (378) — (5,307) 43,852 Funded status of the plan: Benefit obligation in excess of plan assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued pension liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (4,153) (4,153) $ (5,157) (5,157) Actuarial assumptions used in the determination of the benefit obligation of the above data are: Discount rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.68% n/a 4.69% n/a 2012 2011 The fair value of the qualified pension plan assets was $46.5 million at December 31, 2012 and $43.9 million at December 31, 2011. The variation in the fair value of the assets between years was due to the change in the market value of the underlying investments, Company contributions and benefits paid. Estimated future benefit payments expected to be paid in each of the next five years beginning with 2013 are $5.0 million, $4.4 million, $4.1 million, $3.8 million and $3.9 million with an aggregate of $16.7 million for the five years thereafter. As of the most recent actuarial measurement date, the Company is not required to make a minimum contribution for the 2013 calendar year. The Company employs a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of short- and long-term plan liabilities, plan funded status and corporate financial condition. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed-income investments. Furthermore, equity investments are diversified across various stocks, as well as growth, value, and small and large capitalizations. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements and periodic asset/liability studies. The expected role of plan equity investments is to maximize the long-term real growth of fund assets, while the role of fixed income investments is to generate current income, provide for more stable periodic returns and provide some protection against a prolonged decline in the market value of fund equity investments. The current target allocations for plan assets are 50%-70% for equity securities, 20%-50% for fixed income securities, and 0%-15% for cash and alternative investments. Equity securities include U.S. and international equities, while fixed income securities include long-duration and high-yield bond funds. 41 BADGER METER, INC. BADGER METER, INC. BADGER METER, INC. BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 Accounting Standards Codification 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a fair value Accounting Standards Codification 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a fair value Accounting Standards Codification 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a fair value Accounting Standards Codification 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy consists of three broad hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy consists of three broad hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy consists of three broad hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy consists of three broad levels: Level 1 inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and have the highest priority. levels: Level 1 inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and have the highest priority. levels: Level 1 inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and have the highest priority. levels: Level 1 inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and have the highest priority. Level 2 inputs consist of inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either Level 2 inputs consist of inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either Level 2 inputs consist of inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either Level 2 inputs consist of inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for determining the fair value of assets or liabilities that reflect directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for determining the fair value of assets or liabilities that reflect directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for determining the fair value of assets or liabilities that reflect directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for determining the fair value of assets or liabilities that reflect assumptions that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities. The plan uses appropriate valuation techniques assumptions that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities. The plan uses appropriate valuation techniques assumptions that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities. The plan uses appropriate valuation techniques assumptions that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities. The plan uses appropriate valuation techniques based on the available inputs to measure the fair value of its investments. based on the available inputs to measure the fair value of its investments. based on the available inputs to measure the fair value of its investments. based on the available inputs to measure the fair value of its investments. The fair value of the Company's qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2012 are as follows: The fair value of the Company's qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2012 are as follows: The fair value of the Company's qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2012 are as follows: The fair value of the Company's qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2012 are as follows: Quoted Quoted Quoted Quoted prices in active prices in active prices in active prices in active markets for markets for markets for markets for identical assets identical assets identical assets identical assets (Level 1) (Level 1) (Level 1) (Level 1) Market Market Market Market value value value value Significant Significant Significant Significant observable observable observable observable inputs inputs inputs inputs (Level 2) (Level 2) (Level 2) (Level 2) Significant Significant Significant Significant unobservable unobservable unobservable unobservable inputs inputs inputs inputs (Level 3) (Level 3) (Level 3) (Level 3) Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ BADGER METER, INC. BADGER METER, INC. BADGER METER, INC. (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands) 26,067 26,067 26,067 26,067 $ $ $ $ 26,067 26,067 26,067 26,067 $ $ $ $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 20,022 20,022 20,022 20,022 458 458 458 458 20,022 20,022 20,022 20,022 458 458 458 458 — — — — — — — — 46,547 46,547 46,547 46,547 $ $ $ $ 46,547 46,547 46,547 46,547 $ $ $ $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (a) (a) (a) (a) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 of foreign companies and equity funds, or 53.3%, 11.6%, 12.8%, 17.2% and 5.1% of total equity securities, of foreign companies and equity funds, or 53.3%, 11.6%, 12.8%, 17.2% and 5.1% of total equity securities, of foreign companies and equity funds, or 53.3%, 11.6%, 12.8%, 17.2% and 5.1% of total equity securities, of foreign companies and equity funds, or 53.3%, 11.6%, 12.8%, 17.2% and 5.1% of total equity securities, respectively. Of the total equity amount, 11.6% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 86.5% respectively. Of the total equity amount, 11.6% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 86.5% respectively. Of the total equity amount, 11.6% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 86.5% respectively. Of the total equity amount, 11.6% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 86.5% was invested in mutual funds and 1.9% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing was invested in mutual funds and 1.9% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing was invested in mutual funds and 1.9% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing was invested in mutual funds and 1.9% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2012. market prices at December 31, 2012. market prices at December 31, 2012. market prices at December 31, 2012. Accounting Standards Codification 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a fair value Accounting Standards Codification 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a fair value Accounting Standards Codification 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy consists of three broad hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy consists of three broad hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy consists of three broad levels: Level 1 inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and have the highest priority. levels: Level 1 inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and have the highest priority. levels: Level 1 inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and have the highest priority. Level 2 inputs consist of inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either Level 2 inputs consist of inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either Level 2 inputs consist of inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either (b) This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are (b) This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are (b) This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are (b) directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for determining the fair value of assets or liabilities that reflect directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for determining the fair value of assets or liabilities that reflect directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for determining the fair value of assets or liabilities that reflect valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2012. valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2012. valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2012. valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2012. assumptions that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities. The plan uses appropriate valuation techniques assumptions that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities. The plan uses appropriate valuation techniques assumptions that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities. The plan uses appropriate valuation techniques based on the available inputs to measure the fair value of its investments. based on the available inputs to measure the fair value of its investments. based on the available inputs to measure the fair value of its investments. (c) (c) (c) (c) This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. The fair value of the Company's qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2012 are as follows: The fair value of the Company's qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2012 are as follows: The fair value of the Company's qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2012 are as follows: The fair value of the Company’s qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2011 are as follows: The fair value of the Company’s qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2011 are as follows: The fair value of the Company’s qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2011 are as follows: The fair value of the Company’s qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2011 are as follows: Quoted Quoted Quoted Quoted Quoted Quoted Quoted prices in active prices in active prices in active prices in active prices in active prices in active prices in active markets for markets for markets for markets for markets for markets for markets for identical assets identical assets identical assets identical assets identical assets identical assets identical assets (Level 1) (Level 1) (Level 1) (Level 1) (Level 1) (Level 1) (Level 1) Market Market Market Market Market Market Market value value value value value value value Significant Significant Significant Significant Significant Significant Significant observable observable observable observable observable observable observable inputs inputs inputs inputs inputs inputs inputs (Level 2) (Level 2) (Level 2) (Level 2) (Level 2) (Level 2) (Level 2) Significant Significant Significant Significant Significant Significant Significant unobservable unobservable unobservable unobservable unobservable unobservable unobservable inputs inputs inputs inputs inputs inputs inputs (Level 3) (Level 3) (Level 3) (Level 3) (Level 3) (Level 3) (Level 3) Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 26,067 26,067 26,067 25,844 25,844 25,844 25,844 20,022 20,022 20,022 17,439 17,439 17,439 17,439 458 458 458 569 569 569 569 46,547 46,547 46,547 43,852 43,852 43,852 43,852 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands) 26,067 26,067 26,067 25,844 25,844 25,844 25,844 20,022 20,022 20,022 17,439 17,439 17,439 17,439 458 458 458 569 569 569 569 46,547 46,547 46,547 43,852 43,852 43,852 43,852 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities of foreign companies and equity funds, or 53.3%, 11.6%, 12.8%, 17.2% and 5.1% of total equity securities, of foreign companies and equity funds, or 53.3%, 11.6%, 12.8%, 17.2% and 5.1% of total equity securities, of foreign companies and equity funds, or 53.3%, 11.6%, 12.8%, 17.2% and 5.1% of total equity securities, of foreign companies and other, or 54.5%, 15.4%, 12.0%, 14.4% and 3.7% of total assets, respectively. Of the total of foreign companies and other, or 54.5%, 15.4%, 12.0%, 14.4% and 3.7% of total assets, respectively. Of the total of foreign companies and other, or 54.5%, 15.4%, 12.0%, 14.4% and 3.7% of total assets, respectively. Of the total of foreign companies and other, or 54.5%, 15.4%, 12.0%, 14.4% and 3.7% of total assets, respectively. Of the total respectively. Of the total equity amount, 11.6% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 86.5% respectively. Of the total equity amount, 11.6% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 86.5% respectively. Of the total equity amount, 11.6% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 86.5% equity amount, 15.5% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 82.8% was invested in mutual equity amount, 15.5% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 82.8% was invested in mutual equity amount, 15.5% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 82.8% was invested in mutual equity amount, 15.5% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 82.8% was invested in mutual was invested in mutual funds and 1.9% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing was invested in mutual funds and 1.9% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing was invested in mutual funds and 1.9% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing funds and 1.7% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing market prices at funds and 1.7% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing market prices at funds and 1.7% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing market prices at funds and 1.7% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing market prices at market prices at December 31, 2012. market prices at December 31, 2012. market prices at December 31, 2012. December 31, 2011. December 31, 2011. December 31, 2011. December 31, 2011. (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2012. valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2012. valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2012. valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2011. valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2011. valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2011. valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2011. (c) (c) (c) (c) (c) (c) (c) This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. The fair value of the Company’s qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2011 are as follows: The fair value of the Company’s qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2011 are as follows: The fair value of the Company’s qualified pension plan assets by category at December 31, 2011 are as follows: 42 42 42 42 Market Market Market value value value Quoted Quoted Quoted prices in active prices in active prices in active markets for markets for markets for identical assets identical assets identical assets (Level 1) (Level 1) (Level 1) Significant Significant Significant observable observable observable inputs inputs inputs (Level 2) (Level 2) (Level 2) Significant Significant Significant unobservable unobservable unobservable inputs inputs inputs (Level 3) (Level 3) (Level 3) (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands) Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Equity securities(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25,844 25,844 25,844 $ $ $ 25,844 25,844 25,844 $ $ $ — $ — $ — $ Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income funds(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash/cash equivalents(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,439 17,439 17,439 569 569 569 17,439 17,439 17,439 569 569 569 — — — — — — Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 43,852 43,852 43,852 $ $ $ 43,852 43,852 43,852 $ $ $ — $ — $ — $ — — — — — — — — — — — — (a) (a) (a) This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities This category includes investments in equity securities of large, small and medium sized companies, equity securities of foreign companies and other, or 54.5%, 15.4%, 12.0%, 14.4% and 3.7% of total assets, respectively. Of the total of foreign companies and other, or 54.5%, 15.4%, 12.0%, 14.4% and 3.7% of total assets, respectively. Of the total of foreign companies and other, or 54.5%, 15.4%, 12.0%, 14.4% and 3.7% of total assets, respectively. Of the total equity amount, 15.5% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 82.8% was invested in mutual equity amount, 15.5% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 82.8% was invested in mutual equity amount, 15.5% was invested in common stocks in a wide variety of industries, 82.8% was invested in mutual funds and 1.7% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing market prices at funds and 1.7% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing market prices at funds and 1.7% was invested in exchange traded funds. The funds are valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2011. December 31, 2011. December 31, 2011. (b) (b) (b) This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are This category includes investments in investment-grade fixed-income instruments and corporate bonds. The funds are valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2011. valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2011. valued using the closing market prices at December 31, 2011. (c) (c) (c) This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. This category comprises the cash held to pay beneficiaries. The fair value of cash equals its book value. 42 42 42 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 The pension plan has a separately determined accumulated benefit obligation that is the actuarial present value of benefits based on service rendered and current and past compensation levels. Prior to December 31, 2012, this differed from the projected benefit obligation in that it included no assumption about future compensation levels. The accumulated benefit obligation was $50.7 million at December 31, 2012 and $49.0 million at December 31, 2011. Supplemental Non-qualified Unfunded Plans The Company also maintains supplemental non-qualified unfunded plans for certain officers and other key employees. Expense for these plans was $0.3 million for each of the years ended 2012, 2011 and 2010, and the amount accrued was $1.6 million and $1.7 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amounts were determined based on similar assumptions as the qualified pension plan as of the December 31 measurement date for 2012 and 2011. Other Postretirement Benefits The Company has certain postretirement plans that provide medical benefits for certain U.S. retirees and eligible dependents. The following table sets forth the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010: 2012 2011 2010 (In thousands) Service cost, benefits attributed for service of active employees for the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Interest cost on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation . . . . . . . . Amortization of prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net periodic postretirement benefit cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 143 295 161 599 $ $ 148 313 161 622 $ $ 139 337 161 637 The discount rate used to measure the net periodic postretirement benefit cost was 4.79% for 2012, 5.20% for 2011 and 5.65% for 2010. It is the Company's policy to fund healthcare benefits on a cash basis. Because the plans are unfunded, there are no plan assets. The following table provides a reconciliation of the projected benefit obligation at the Company's December 31 measurement date: 2012 2011 Benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Service cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial (gain) loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plan participants contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Benefit obligation and funded status at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ The amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31 are: $ (In thousands) 6,542 143 295 422 673 (1,135) 6,940 $ 6,459 148 313 (1) 718 (1,095) 6,542 2012 2011 (In thousands) Accrued compensation and employee benefits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Accrued non-pension postretirement benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amounts recognized at December 31. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 451 6,489 6,940 $ $ 439 6,103 6,542 The discount rate used to measure the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 3.92% for 2012 and 4.79% for 2011. The Company's discount rate assumptions for its postretirement benefit plan are based on the average yield of a hypothetical high quality bond portfolio with maturities that approximately match the estimated cash flow needs of the plan. Because the plan requires the Company to establish fixed Company contribution amounts for retiree healthcare benefits, future healthcare cost trends do not generally impact the Company's accruals or provisions. 43 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 Estimated future benefit payments of postretirement benefits, assuming increased cost sharing, expected to be paid in each of the next five years beginning with 2012 are $0.5 million in each year with an aggregate of $2.4 million for the five years thereafter. These amounts can vary significantly from year to year because the cost sharing estimates can vary from actual expenses as the Company is self-insured. Badger Meter Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan In 2010, the Company restructured the outstanding debt of its Employee Savings and Stock Option Plan (the “ESSOP”) by loaning the ESSOP $0.5 million to repay a loan to a third party and loaning the ESSOP an additional $1.0 million to purchase additional shares of the Company’s Common Stock for future 401(k) savings plan matches under a program that will expire on December 31, 2020. Under this program, the Company agreed to pay the principal and interest on the new loan amount of $1.5 million. The receivable from the ESSOP and the related obligation were therefore netted to zero on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011. The terms of the loan call for equal payments of principal with the final payment due on December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2012, $1.2 million of the loan balance remained. The Company made principal payments of $256,000, $51,000 and $49,000 in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The associated commitments released shares of Common Stock (16,151 shares in 2012 for the 2011 obligation, 10,735 shares in 2011 for the 2010 obligation, and 12,309 shares in 2010 for the 2009 obligation) for allocation to participants in the ESSOP. The ESSOP held unreleased shares of 93,357, 111,145 and 121,880 as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, with a fair value of $4.4 million, $3.3 million and $5.4 million as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Unreleased shares are not considered outstanding for purposes of computing earnings per share. The ESSOP includes a voluntary 401(k) savings plan that allows certain employees to defer up to 20% of their income on a pretax basis subject to limits on maximum amounts. The Company matches 25% of each employee’s contribution, with the match percentage applying to a maximum of 7% of each employee's salary. The match is paid using the Company's Common Stock released through the ESSOP loan payments. For ESSOP shares purchased prior to 1993, compensation expense is recognized based on the original purchase price of the shares released and dividends on unreleased shares are charged to compensation expense. For shares purchased in or after 1993, expense is based on the market value of the shares on the date released and dividends on unreleased shares are charged to compensation expense. Compensation expense of $0.3 million was recognized for the match for 2012, $0.3 million was recognized for 2011 and $0.2 million for 2010. On December 31, 2010, the Company froze the qualified pension plan for its non-union participants and formed a new defined contribution feature within the ESSOP plan in which each employee received a similar benefit. On December 31, 2011, the Company froze the qualified pension plan for its union participants and included them in the same defined contribution feature within the ESSOP. For 2012, compensation expense under the defined contribution feature totaled $1.8 million. Note 8 Income Taxes The Company is subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes and recording the related deferred tax assets and liabilities. Details of earnings before income taxes are as follows: Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 40,650 2,821 43,471 $ $ 23,750 3,599 27,349 $ $ 42,213 2,225 44,438 2012 2011 2010 (In thousands) 44 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 The provision for income taxes are as follows: 2012 2011 2010 (In thousands) Current: Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred: Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,908 $ 7,111 $ 1,455 507 (663) (165) 397 15,439 $ 1,290 780 (774) (79) (140) 8,188 $ 14,696 2,553 385 (1,485) (324) (49) 15,776 The provision (benefit) for income taxes differs from the amount that would be provided by applying the statutory U.S. corporate income tax rate in each year due to the following items: Provision at statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Domestic production activities deduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax audit settlements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actual provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2012 2011 2010 (In thousands) 15,215 $ 9,572 $ 1,018 (87) (529) (101) (77) 15,439 783 (621) (255) (1,330) 39 $ 8,188 $ 15,553 1,449 (430) (573) — (223) 15,776 The components of deferred income taxes as of December 31 are as follows: Deferred tax assets: Reserve for receivables and inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Accrued compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-pension postretirement benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued pension benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued employee benefits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax liabilities: Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2012 2011 (In thousands) 1,991 $ 876 582 2,652 2,912 1,540 745 1,674 873 717 2,516 3,338 1,266 131 11,298 10,515 4,657 11,437 — 16,094 (4,796) $ 3,529 1,263 64 4,856 5,659 45 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 At December 31, 2012, the Company did not have any net operating loss carryforwards. No provision for federal income taxes was made on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries that are considered permanently invested or that would be offset by foreign tax credits upon distribution. Such undistributed earnings at December 31, 2012 were $16.2 million. Changes in the Company's gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, are as follows: Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Increases (decreases) in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of positions taken during the prior period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of positions taken during the current period Decreases in unrecognized tax benefits relating to settlements with taxing authorities. . . . . . . Reductions to unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at end of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2012 2011 (In thousands) 796 $ 2,125 (18) 162 (70) (172) 698 $ 8 141 (1,368) (110) 796 The Company does not expect a significant increase or decrease to the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013. To the extent these unrecognized tax benefits are ultimately recognized, they will impact the effective tax rate in a future period, possibly as early as the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013. The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2008. The Company's policy is to recognize interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as interest expense and penalties as operating expenses. Accrued interest was approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and there were no penalties accrued in either year. The Company believes that it has appropriate support for the income tax positions taken and to be taken on its tax returns and that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open years based on an assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the facts of each matter. Note 9 Long-Term Debt In 2010, the Company restructured the outstanding debt of its ESSOP by loaning the ESSOP $0.5 million to repay a loan to a third party and loaning the ESSOP an additional $1.0 million to purchase additional shares of the Company’s Common Stock for future 401(k) savings plan matches under a program that will expire on December 31, 2020. Under this program, the Company agreed to pay the principal and interest on the new loan amount of $1.5 million. The receivable from the ESSOP and the related obligation were therefore netted to zero on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011. The terms of the loan call for equal payments of principal with the final payment due on December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2012, $1.2 million of the loan balance remained. 46 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 Note 10 Industry Segment and Geographic Areas The Company is an innovator, manufacturer and a marketer of products incorporating flow measurement and control technologies, which comprise one reportable segment. The Company manages and evaluates its operations as one segment primarily due to similarities in the nature of the products, production processes, customers and methods of distribution. Information regarding revenues by geographic area are as follows: Revenues: United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Foreign: Asia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Europe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Information regarding assets by geographic area are as follows: 2012 2011 2010 (In thousands) 271,045 $ 231,306 $ 245,846 10,075 8,752 16,001 6,636 7,151 2,229 3,362 12,997 8,178 4,843 2,793 4,147 9,368 9,924 4,556 319,660 $ 262,915 $ 276,634 Long-lived assets (all non-current assets except deferred income taxes): United States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Foreign: 2012 2011 (In thousands) 133,628 $ 79,556 Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15,261 20,190 15,286 20,564 169,079 $ 115,406 Total assets: United States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Foreign: 2012 2011 (In thousands) 236,442 $ 166,171 Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 31,461 22,550 28,920 23,819 290,453 $ 218,910 47 BADGER METER, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 Note 11 Unaudited: Quarterly Results of Operations, Common Stock Price and Dividends 2012 Net sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Earnings per share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Diluted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Dividends declared . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Stock price: High. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Quarter-end close . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2011 Net sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Earnings per share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Diluted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Dividends declared . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Stock price: High. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Quarter-end close . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Quarter ended March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 (In thousands except per share data) 76,233 28,864 6,249 0.42 0.42 0.16 35.05 29.30 33.99 57,359 20,437 3,260 0.22 0.22 0.14 45.47 36.44 41.21 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 81,974 30,201 7,442 0.52 0.52 0.16 39.73 32.61 37.55 75,148 27,220 7,834 0.52 0.52 0.14 41.61 33.98 36.99 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 87,130 34,330 8,857 0.63 0.62 0.17 39.85 32.29 36.39 69,698 22,780 6,880 0.46 0.46 0.16 40.83 28.66 28.93 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 74,323 28,851 5,484 0.39 0.39 0.17 48.60 36.25 47.41 60,710 19,383 1,187 0.08 0.08 0.16 35.41 26.86 29.43 The Company's Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BMI. Earnings per share is computed independently for each quarter. As such, the annual per share amount may not equal the sum of the quarterly amounts due to rounding. The Company currently anticipates continuing to pay cash dividends. Shareholders of record as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 totaled 981 and 952, respectively. Voting trusts and street name shareholders are counted as single shareholders for this purpose. 48 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Company's management evaluated, with the participation of the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and the Company's Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the year ended December 31, 2012. Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and the Company's Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer concluded that, as of the date of such evaluation, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting The report of management required under this Item 9A is contained in Item 8 of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10- K under the heading “Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting The attestation report required under this Item 9A is contained in Item 8 of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.” ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. 49 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Information required by this Item with respect to directors is included under the headings "Nomination and Election of Directors" and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 26, 2013, and is incorporated herein by reference. Information concerning the executive officers of the Company is included in Part I, Item 1 of this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Business - Employees.” The Company has adopted the Badger Meter, Inc. Code of Conduct for Financial Executives that applies to the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, the Company's Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and other persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Badger Meter, Inc. Code of Conduct for Financial Executives is posted on the Company's website at www.badgermeter.com. The Badger Meter, Inc. Code of Conduct for Financial Executives is also available in print to any shareholder who requests it in writing from the Secretary of the Company. The Company satisfies the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendments to, or waivers from, the Badger Meter, Inc. Code of Conduct for Financial Executives by posting such information on the Company's website at www.badgermeter.com. The Company is not including the information contained on its website as part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Information required by this Item is included under the headings "Executive Compensation" and “Corporate Governance Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 26, 2013, and is incorporated herein by reference; provided, however, that the information under the subsection "Executive Compensation - Corporate Governance Committee Report" is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or to be the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent it is specifically incorporated by reference into such a filing. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Information required by this Item is included under the headings "Stock Ownership of Beneficial Owners Holding More than Five Percent,” “Stock Ownership of Management" and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 26, 2013, and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE Information required by this Item is included under the headings "Related Person Transactions" and “Nomination and Election of Directors - Independence, Committees, Meetings and Attendance” in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 26, 2013, and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES Information required by this Item is included under the heading "Principal Accounting Firm Fees" in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 26, 2013, and is incorporated herein by reference. 50 PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: 1. 2. 3. Financial Statements. See the financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, under the headings “Consolidated Balance Sheets,” “Consolidated Statements of Operations,” ”Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income,” “Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows” and “Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity.” Financial Statement Schedules. Financial statement schedules are omitted because the information required in these schedules is included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Exhibits. See the Exhibit Index included in this 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K that is incorporated herein by reference. 51 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 5, 2013. BADGER METER, INC. By: /s/ Richard A. Meeusen Richard A. Meeusen Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 5, 2013. Name Title /s/ Richard A. Meeusen Richard A. Meeusen /s/ Richard E. Johnson Richard E. Johnson /s/ Beverly L. P. Smiley Beverly L. P. Smiley /s/ Ronald H. Dix Ronald H. Dix /s/ Gale E. Klappa Gale E. Klappa /s/ Gail A. Lione Gail A. Lione /s/ Thomas J. Fischer Thomas J. Fischer /s/ Andrew J. Policano Andrew J. Policano /s/ Steven J. Smith Steven J. Smith /s/ Todd J. Teske Todd J. Teske Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal executive officer) Senior Vice President — Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal financial officer) Vice President — Controller (Principal accounting officer) Director Director Director Director Director Director Director 52 BOard O f dI reCtOrs eXeCUtIV e OffIC ers richard a. Meeusen chairman, president and chief executive officer, Badger Meter, inc. andrew J. Policano (2, 3) dean, paul Merage school of Business, university of california, irvine ronald H. dix (3) retired senior vice president, Badger Meter, inc. steven J. smith (1, 2) chairman and chief executive officer, Journal communications, inc. thomas J. fischer (1, 3) consultant in corporate financial and accounting Matters; retired partner, arthur andersen llp todd J. teske (1, 2) chairman, president and chief executive officer, Briggs & stratton corporation committees of the Board 1. audit and compliance 2. compensation and corporate governance 3. employee Benefit plans gale e. Klappa (1, 2) chairman, president and chief executive officer, wisconsin energy corporation gail a. lione (3) retired president, the harley-davidson foundation and former executive vice president, general counsel and secretary, harley-davidson corporation COr POr ate I NfOr MatION Badger Meter, Inc. Headquarters 4545 w. Brown deer road p.o. Box 245036 Milwaukee, wisconsin 53224-9536 (414) 355-0400 www.badgermeter.com domestic facilities Milwaukee, wisconsin tulsa, oklahoma scottsdale, arizona racine, wisconsin foreign facilities neuffen, germany nogales, Mexico Brno, czech republic Bern, switzerland Independent registered Public accounting firm ernst & young llp, Milwaukee, wisconsin transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company, llc new york, new york (877) 248-6415 www.amstock.com listing of Common stock new york stock exchange, symbol — BMi annual Meeting shareholders are encouraged to attend the 2013 annual meeting at 8:30 a.m., local time, on friday, april 26, 2013 at the Milwaukee club, 706 n. Jefferson street, Milwaukee, wisconsin 53202. form 10-K report/shareholder Information a copy of the company’s fiscal 2012 form 10-K annual report (without exhibits) as filed with the securities and exchange commission is included in this report. shareholder information, including news releases, form 10-K, and corporate governance information, including the company’s corporate governance guidelines, code of Business conduct and charters for committees of the Board of directors, are available on the company’s web site: www.badgermeter. com. shareholders who hold their stock in nominee or “street” name can receive shareholder information directly from the company by being placed on our mailing list. please direct inquiries to: shareholder relations, Badger Meter, inc., p.o. Box 245036, Milwaukee, wi 53224-9536, or call (414) 371-5702. richard a. Meeusen chairman, president and chief executive officer richard e. Johnson senior vice president – finance, chief financial officer and treasurer fred J. Begale vice president – engineering William r. Bergum vice president – general counsel and secretary gregory M. gomez vice president – Business development Horst e. gras vice president – international operations raymond g. serdynski vice president – Manufacturing Beverly l. smiley vice president – controller Kimberly K. stoll vice president – sales and Marketing dennis J. Webb vice president – customer solutions automatic dividend reinvestment and stock Purchase Plan Badger Meter’s dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan is a convenient way to acquire shares of company stock. to receive a prospectus describing the plan and an enrollment card, please contact our plan administrator, american stock transfer at (877) 248-6415, or visit their web site: www.amstock.com. if your stock certificate is lost, stolen or destroyed, or if you change your address or lose a dividend check, please call american stock transfer at (877) 248-6415. direct registration system shareholders of Badger Meter common stock can hold their shares in uncertificated/book entry form at the transfer agent. current shareholders who wish to transfer their existing shares to direct registration should mail their stock certificates to american stock transfer per the instructions on their web site: www.amstock.com. for more information, please call american stock transfer at (877) 248-6415. forward looking statements certain statements contained in this document, as well as other information provided from time to time by the company or its employees, may contain forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements. please see page one of the enclosed form 10-K for a list of words or expressions that identify such statements and the risks and uncertainties identified in the form 10-K. Certifications the company filed as exhibits to its fiscal 2012 form 10-K the certifications of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer required by section 302 of the sarbanes-oxley act. the company also submitted to the new york stock exchange during 2012 the annual ceo certification required by section 303a.12(a) of the new york stock exchange listed company Manual. trademarks trademarks appearing in this document are the property of their respective entities. ©2013 Badger Meter, inc. all rights reserved. BADGER METER, INC. 4545 W. BROWN DEER ROAD P.0. BOX 245036 MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN 53224-9536 WWW.BADGERMETER.COM 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above