Quarterlytics / Industrials / Residential Construction / Bellway

Bellway

bwy · LSE Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker bwy
Exchange LSE
Sector Industrials
Industry Residential Construction
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2015 Annual Report · Bellway
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Bellway p.l.c.
Seaton Burn House,  
Dudley Lane,  
Seaton Burn,  
Newcastle upon Tyne  
NE13 6BE

Tel: (0191) 217 0717 
Fax: (0191) 236 6230 
DX: 711760 Seaton Burn

www.bellway.co.uk

l
l

B
e
w
a
y
p

.
l
.
c
. 
A
n
n
u
a

l

R
e
p
o
r
t

a
n
d
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
2
0
1
1

aNNuaL rEporT 
aND accouNTS 2011

 
 
 
 
 
Welcome to this year’s report

Since its formation more than 50 years ago, 
Bellway has built over 100,000 homes. 
It is recognised throughout the industry 
for building quality homes.

accounts
45  Group Income Statement
45  Statements of Comprehensive 

Income

46 Statement of Changes in Equity
48 Balance Sheets
49 Cash Flow Statements
50 Accounting Policies
55 Notes to the Accounts

other information
77  Five Year Record
78  Shareholder Information
82  Notice of Annual General 

Meeting
85  Glossary
IBC Principal Offices

Business review
  1 Financial Highlights
  2 Chairman’s Statement
  6 Chief Executive’s Operating 

Review

13 Corporate Responsibility  

Policy

14 2011 Corporate Social 

Responsibility Statement
16 Key Performance Indicators 

(Non-Financial)
19 Environmental Policy
20 Group Finance Director’s Review
24 Operating Risk Statement

Governance 
26 Board of Directors
27 Advisers
28 Report of the Directors
35 Report of the Board on 
Directors’ Remuneration
43  Statement of Directors’ 

Responsibilities in respect of the 
Annual Report and Accounts
44 Independent Auditors’ Report to 
the Members of Bellway p.l.c.

Front cover: Carillons, Wokingham, Berkshire.

Back cover: Church Meadow, East Huntspill, Somerset.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

Find your dream home on the move 
with our new app for iPhone and iPad 

Search through hundreds of properties 
nationwide by price, number of bedrooms, 
house type and more. Get direct access to a 
member of our sales team to request further 
information or answer any of your queries.

Bellway p.l.c.
Seaton Burn House, Dudley Lane, Seaton Burn, Newcastle upon Tyne NE13 6BE

Tel: (0191) 217 0717; Fax: (0191) 236 6230; DX 711760 Seaton Burn; Website: www.bellway.co.uk

Bellway Homes Limited

East Midlands
No. 3 Romulus Court
Meridian East
Meridian Business Park
Braunstone Town
Leicester LE19 1YG
Tel: (0116) 282 0400
Fax: (0116) 282 0401

Essex
Bellway House
1 Rainsford Road
Chelmsford
Essex CM1 2PZ
Tel: (01245) 259 989
Fax: (01245) 259 996
DX: 121935 Chelmsford 6

North East
Peel House
Main Street, Ponteland
Newcastle upon Tyne 
NE20 9NN
Tel: (01661) 820 200
Fax: (01661) 821 010
DX: 68924 Ponteland 2

North London
Bellway House
Bury Street, Ruislip
Middlesex HA4 7SD
Tel: (01895) 671 100
Fax: (01895) 671 111

North West
Bellway House
2 Alderman Road
Liverpool L24 9LR
Tel: (0151) 486 2900
Fax: (0151) 336 9393

Northern Home counties
Oak House
Woodlands Business Park
Breckland, Linford Wood
Milton Keynes MK14 6EY
Tel: (01908) 328 800
Fax: (01908) 328 801
DX: 729383 Milton Keynes 16

Scotland
Bothwell House
Hamilton Business Park
Caird Street
Hamilton ML3 0QA
Tel: (01698) 477 440
Fax: (01698) 477 441
DX: HA13 Hamilton

South East
Bellway House
London Road North
Merstham
Surrey RH1 3YU
Tel: (01737) 644 911
Fax: (01737) 646 319

Thames Gateway
Osprey House
Crayfields Business Park
New Mill Road
Orpington
Kent BR5 3QJ
Tel: (01689) 886 400
Fax: (01689) 886 410

Wales
Alexander House
Excelsior Road
Western Avenue
Cardiff CF14 3AT
Tel: (029) 2054 4700
Fax: (029) 2054 4701

Wessex
Bellway House
Embankment Way
Castleman Business Centre
Ringwood
Hampshire BH24 1EU
Tel: (01425) 477 666
Fax: (01425) 474 382
DX: 45710 Ringwood

West Midlands
Bellway House
Relay Point
Relay Drive, Tamworth
Staffordshire B77 5PA
Tel: (01827) 255 755
Fax: (01827) 255 766
DX: 717023 Tamworth

Yorkshire
2 Deighton Close
Wetherby
West Yorkshire LS22 7GZ
Tel: (01937) 583 533
Fax: (01937) 586 147
DX: 16815 Wetherby

Other Subsidiary

Bellway Housing Trust Limited
Seaton Burn House
Dudley Lane
Seaton Burn
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE13 6BE
Tel: (0191) 217 0717
Fax: (0191) 236 6230
DX: 711760 Seaton Burn

Designed and produced by radley Yeldar www.ry.com
Printed on paper sourced from sustainable sources, using vegetable-based inks.

1

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Business Review
Financial Highlights

Completed sales (homes)

Average selling price (£)

4,380

4,595

4,922

154,005

163,175

175,613

2009

2010

2011

7.1%

2009

2010

2011

7.6%

Total Group revenue (£m)

Profit before taxation (£m)

886.1

768.3

683.8

2009

2010

2011

67.2

44.4

29.8(1)

2009

2010

2011

15.3%

51.2%

Earnings per ordinary share (p)

Final dividend for the year (p)

41.5

29.7

17.7(1)

2009

2010

2011

8.8

6.7

6.0

39.7%

2009

2010

2011

31.3%

Forward order book at 30 September (£m)

Operating margin (%)

396.7

418.8

349.4

8.5

6.7

6.7

2009

2010

2011

(1) Before exceptional items.

4.8%

2009

2010

2011

26.9%

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

2

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Business Review
Chairman’s Statement

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

“against a backdrop of ongoing 
economic uncertainty” ... the  
Group ... “has performed very well 
in the year ended 31 July 2011.”

“Bellway aims to continue to increase both volumes 
and average selling prices, the latter by way of 
ongoing changes in the product mix. This, combined 
with the improvement in the operating margin, 
should ensure that shareholder value continues to 
be enhanced.”

3

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Introduction

Board Changes

Peter Stoker retired as Commercial Director on 31 July 
and was replaced by Ted Ayres in the new role of 
Operations Director. Ted joined the Group in 2002, 
firstly as Managing Director of our Thames Gateway 
division and since 2006 has held the position of 
Southern Regional Chairman. 

Alistair Leitch, our Finance Director since 2002, has 
decided to retire on 31 January 2012 and he will be 
replaced by Keith Adey, the Group Chief Accountant. 

On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank Peter and 
Alistair for their significant contributions to the Group 
over many years and welcome Ted and Keith to the 
Board, and wish them every success in their new roles.

Outlook

Whilst developments in and around London, where we 
presently operate from about 35 sites, have been the 
most resilient, there are many areas throughout the rest 
of the country where activity has also been encouraging. 
Reservations in the first nine weeks of the new financial 
year are almost 11% ahead of the same period last year, 
and at 30 September the Group had an order book of 
£418.8 million (2010 – £396.7 million). We continue to 
focus on rebuilding the Group’s operating margin and 
anticipate it rising further, primarily from an increased 
contribution from recently acquired land.

Bellway aims to continue to increase both volumes and 
average selling prices, the latter by way of ongoing 
changes in the product mix. This, combined with the 
improvement in the operating margin, should ensure 
that shareholder value continues to be enhanced. The 
Board is confident of delivering these improvements 
over the next 12 months but, as ever, remains mindful 
of current economic uncertainties. 

Howard C Dawe

Chairman 
17 October 2011

In my statement last year I referred to the lessons learnt 
by the Board during previous downturns, and these 
lessons continue to be applied in what remain testing 
times for the UK housebuilding industry. Against a 
backdrop of ongoing economic uncertainty, the housing 
market has stabilised and the Group, in general, has 
performed very well in the year ended 31 July 2011. 
With profit before tax rising by just over 50%, the 
Board has decided to increase the final dividend by just 
over 30%. Bellway has an uninterrupted record of 
paying dividends since 1979, which is unique in the UK 
housebuilding industry.

Trading and Results

After a relatively slow start to the financial year and 
poor weather conditions prior to Christmas, the 
Group’s average weekly reservation rate rose during 
the early part of 2011 and did not fall until the summer 
months, thereby returning to a typical pattern for a 
normal housing market. During the year, the Group 
legally completed the sale of 4,922 homes, an increase 
of just over 7% compared to the previous year, at an 
average selling price of £175,613, an increase of almost 
8%. These two factors, combined with other revenue 
of £21.7 million, mean that turnover for the Group has 
grown in the year from £768.3 million to £886.1 million, 
an increase of just over 15%. The operating margin has 
risen from 6.7% to 8.5% for the full year and, in the 
second half rose to 9.8%, thereby increasing operating 
profit to £75.2 million from £51.3 million in the previous 
year. Net finance charges total £8.0 million compared to 
£6.8 million last year. As a consequence, profit before 
tax has increased by 51.2% to £67.2 million from £44.4 
million in 2010. Basic earnings per share have increased 
to 41.5p from 29.7p and the net asset value per ordinary 
share grew by almost 4% from 856p to 888p at 31 July. 
At the end of the financial year the Group had 
£3.4 million of net cash and £290 million of facilities 
with its banking partners. 

Dividend

The Board is proposing to increase the final dividend 
from 6.7p to 8.8p, a rise of 31.3%, producing a total 
dividend for the year of 12.5p, up 25% from 10p in 
2010. This dividend, which is covered over 3.3 times, 
will be paid on Wednesday 18 January 2012 to all 
ordinary shareholders on the Register of Members 
on Friday 16 December 2011. The ex-dividend date 
is Wednesday 14 December 2011. 

Employees, Sub-contractors and Suppliers

I would like to express the Board’s gratitude to all 
its employees, sub-contractors, suppliers and other 
partners for their efforts in what has been another 
encouraging but challenging year for the Group. 

Customers Raphael and Georgia viewing the showhouse at 
Williamson Place, Liverpool, Merseyside.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

4

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

THE COPPICE,
TAKELEY, ESSEX.

The Coppice offers a selection of 3, 4 and 5 
bedroomed houses. 

Number of homes on this development

98

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

completed sales in the year

5

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

4,9226

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Business Review
Chief Executive’s Operating Review

“the Group continues to focus on  
the delivery of the same three-
pronged strategy of increasing 
volume, average selling price 
and operating margin.”

“The Group ended the year operating from 
205 outlets, having started with 185 and, 
with the benefit of a strong balance sheet, 
we are in a good position to increase our 
land bank and sales outlets in the future.”

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

Background

At the beginning of the financial year the marketplace 
had stabilised, but a degree of uncertainty had been 
created by the looming austerity measures to be 
proposed in the Government’s Comprehensive 
Spending Review. The number of “down-valuations” 
received from mortgage providers was reducing and 
cancellations from customers who had reserved a new 
home remained at around 13%, with no change to the 
level of incentives being offered on new homes. Despite 
the uncertainty, the challenge faced by the Group was 
simply to improve profitability and shareholder returns. 
To do this a three-pronged strategy was implemented 
aimed at increasing volumes, raising average selling 
prices and lifting operating margins. 

Sales Volumes and Pricing

The first six months of the financial year saw an average 
sales rate of 80 homes per week, a slight reduction 
compared to the previous year, but severe weather 
conditions before Christmas slowed visitor and sales 
rates further. First-time buyers, in particular, continued 
to face major obstacles in gaining access to mortgage 
products. The strong brought forward sales position on 
1 August 2010, however, enabled the Group to 
complete the sale of 2,332 homes in the first six months 
of the financial year, compared to 2,247 in the previous 
year. Furthermore, our order book by 31 January 
remained healthy at £402.3 million. 

With the onset of the new calendar year and improved 
weather conditions, sales reservation rates began to 
rise, culminating in an average sales rate in the second 
half of the year of 106 homes per week. This increased 
rate was supported by the opening of more selling 
outlets and, consequently, the number of legal 
completions in the second half of the year increased by 
10%, to 2,590, compared to the previous year. The 
turnover from 4,922 homes sold in the full year was 
£864.4 million, producing an average selling price of 
£175,613, up 7.6% from £163,175 in the previous year. 
The increase in the average selling price was achieved by 
a combination of factors, including the completion of 
several high value developments in and around London 
where the average selling price was in excess of 
£250,000, and by a change in the product mix outside 
London where apartments have been replaced by 
higher value family homes. 

In achieving this increase in volume and pricing, 
customers were regularly incentivised, which ranged 
from simple discounting to the use of our part-exchange 
arrangements. The latter was employed in 13%, or 630, 
of our legal completions, which is 137 more transactions 
than the previous year. The Group’s part-exchange 
stock, however, increased from 115 homes to 175 
homes by 31 July with a value of around £23.3 million.

Due largely to the ongoing lack of accessible mortgages 
for first-time buyers, shared equity schemes have 
become popular in recent years and these 
arrangements were employed in 10% of legal 

completions during the year. The use of this selling aid, 
however, has fallen from 18% in the previous year, as the 
Government’s original HomeBuy Direct initiative came 
to an end in September 2010. At 31 July, Bellway held 
£33.5 million of this type of asset on its balance sheet, 
which represents just under 50% of the original 
deferred sums due from home purchasers. 

Operating Margins and the Cost Base

The operating margin also continued to improve and 
moved up to 8.5%, an increase from 6.7% in the prior 
year. This improvement is the consequence of several 
different elements but is being achieved primarily 
through a combination of a growing output from newly 
acquired land where gross margins are in excess of 20%, 
and also efficient management of the Group’s cost base. 
In addition, we are gradually trading out of the older 
sites with lower margins. The new sites contributed 
some 27% of our legal completions during the course 
of the financial year and as this percentage increases 
there should be a continuing improvement in the 
operating margin. 

With regard to the cost base, as the production 
of new homes, nationally, remains low, competition 
for work remains high amongst our sub-contractors 
and suppliers. Whilst there are many inflationary and 
regulatory pressures at all levels in the housebuilding 
process, our costs overall have not seen any substantial 
increases during the course of the year and this has 
helped to support the increase in the operating margin. 
The majority of materials used in building a new home 
are negotiated with national suppliers on a fixed price 
basis, typically for 12 months or more, and this helps 
to smooth out short-term fluctuations in material prices. 
Whilst labour rates vary from region to region, our 
strong order book provides visibility of workload for 
sub-contractors, providing the Group with a strong 
negotiating platform. As a result, the cost of labour-
intensive activities such as road, sewer and foundation 
works have remained relatively stable throughout 
the year. 

Looking back over the last two to three years we 
estimate the cost of building an average sized home has 
fallen by around 8%. Challenges in future to the cost 
base will come in the shape of higher planning fees and 
the costs involved in reducing CO2 emissions. During 
the course of the year, approximately 1,000 homes had 
either solar or photovoltaic panels installed, and three 
blocks of apartments were built with a heating plant 
installed in the basement, fuelled by wood chip as its 

Completed sales (homes)

4,380

4,595

4,922

2009

2010

2011

7.1%

7

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

8

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

TEMPUS, 
HaRRow, MiddlESEx.

a development of 1, 2 and 3 bed 
apartments.

Number of homes on this development

158

9

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

10

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Business Review
Chief Executive’s Operating Review (continued)

main heating source. Such new technology does 
put pressure on costs and one of our main challenges 
is to manage this process whilst maintaining product 
efficiency and without negatively affecting operating 
margins.

Divisional Performance

Many commentators talk about a current north/south 
divide in the housing market but our six northern 
divisions legally completed 2,345 homes, an increase of 
18% compared to the previous year. Almost half of this 
volume increase was delivered by the West Midlands 
division which achieved 500 legal completions in the 
year, a similar volume to the North East division which 
consistently achieves this level of output. 

The average selling price of the homes legally completed 
in the north remained broadly static compared to 2010, 
with the North East division having the highest average 
selling price of £167,592. Conversely, the southern 
divisions’ average selling price increased by 13.1% to 
£203,973 but sales volumes remained broadly static 
at 2,577. The Thames Gateway division, following the 
completion of some high rise apartment blocks in the 
east end of London and Greenwich Peninsula, has seen 
average selling prices increase since last year by almost 
40% to £212,694. Developments such as these benefit 
from a more diverse marketing strategy with buyers 
from the Far East, in particular, being prepared to buy 
off-plan at an early stage in the construction process. 

Out of the total number of new homes legally 
completed, only 339 were acquired by housing 
associations in the north, compared with 740 in the 
south. Housing associations are prepared to acquire 
homes in London and its suburbs over and above the 
normal planning obligations, creating a more diverse 
marketplace, which does influence our thinking when 
it comes to land buying. 

Buying off-plan is unusual in these current market 
conditions and the Group has not only increased its 
work in progress levels on a number of sites to create 
“street scenes”, it has also increased the number of 
show homes by 13% to enable potential customers to 
view our finished product. 

Targeting Land Buying

Bellway ended the financial year in a net cash position 
of £3.4 million having expended £250 million on land 
and land creditors during the year. The majority of this 
expenditure was in the south, most notably sites at 
Stepney in east London for 350 homes and a redundant 
hospital in Carshalton, Surrey for 180 homes. Further 
investment in the north has also taken place, for 
example, a site only five miles north of Newcastle city 
centre gained planning permission, on appeal, for 330 
homes. A Premier League football club’s former training 
ground was acquired in the North West and planning 
permission has been granted for 80 detached homes. 
The average selling price of £400,000 will bring a 

welcome boost to that division’s current average selling 
price of £133,863. Land previously held under option 
near Leicester was eventually granted planning approval 
for 200 homes. All the aforementioned sites will 
contribute towards the 2011/12 financial year output. 
Land acquisitions during the year continue to be subject 
to approval by our Head Office team, in conjunction 
with the Regional Chairmen, and this process ensures 
that our margin disciplines are not compromised. 

At 31 July 2011, as a result of adding 5,406 plots, the 
land owned with planning permission has increased 
to 18,086 plots. In addition, land owned or controlled 
pending a planning permission represents a further 
13,000 plots. Long-term land, typically held under 
option, amounts to over 3,000 acres, where we now 
have some 1,600 plots with planning applications 
submitted, awaiting the outcome of the planning process.

This land bank provides the Group with new sales 
outlets but it is unrealistic, given current market 
conditions, to assume that the sales rate per outlet will 
increase. To fulfil our growth aspirations, therefore, the 
focus has been, and will continue to be, whilst current 
market conditions persist, the opening of more selling 
outlets. The Group ended the year operating from 205 
outlets, having started with 185 and, with the benefit 
of a strong balance sheet, we are in a good position to 
increase our land bank and sales outlets in the future. 

The Environment and Health and Safety

Increasing site activity needs to be combined with 
minimising the environmental effects, with waste 
management continuing to be one of our priorities. 
Divisions work in conjunction with their sub-contractors 
to minimise waste and maximise recycling, and this year 
we used 16,936 waste skips compared to 17,375 last 
year, which represents a reduction in skips per home 
sold of 9%. Wherever possible we attempt to reuse 
demolition waste on our sites, typically under hard 
standing or landscaping areas. All timber products 
such as roof trusses and floor beams are procured 
from sustainable sources, and underground drainage 
systems are now being procured where the pipe work 
is manufactured using 50% recycled UPVC materials, 
thereby reducing the use of crude oil in the 
manufacturing process. The introduction of new building 
regulations has resulted in more homes being tested for 
air retention which, in turn, helps reduce CO2 emissions 
by 25%, compared to homes constructed under 
previous regulations.

Whilst the grant of planning permission can be 
controversial within a local community, there are often 
significant benefits which follow as a result of signing 
planning agreements. This year we estimate more than 
£30 million will be spent on local improvements in 
terms of transport, education and health care facilities 
in relevant local authority areas. For example, at Barking 
Riverside in east London, in conjunction with our 
partner, the Homes and Communities Agency, a 

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

11

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

multi-million pound contribution was made to facilitate 
the construction of a new primary school and 
community facilities, which opened in September 2011. 

A safe working environment for our employees, 
sub-contractors and suppliers is of prime concern. 
In this financial year I am pleased to report a 19% 
reduction in the over three-day absence accident ratio 
on Bellway’s building sites.

Putting the Customer First

Revised customer care procedures were implemented 
at the start of the financial year to improve practice, 
process and work methods and increase the level of 
supervision in relation to quality control. As a result of 
these changes, greater communication now takes place 
with customers after they have moved into their new 
home. A new benchmark has been introduced whereby 
we are striving to resolve customer complaints within 
seven days of notification. Furthermore, in an effort 
to improve our out of hours, seven days a week 
emergency service, a new national helpline for our 
customers has been introduced. 

We continue to employ an independent consultant 
to survey our client base and in our latest survey 
to the end of June 2011, reported that 91% of clients 
“Would Recommend a Friend” to buy a Bellway home 
compared with 86% the previous year. Hopefully, the 
new measures introduced at the start of the financial 
year will prove beneficial, resulting in a higher 
percentage of satisfied customers in years to come. 

Outlook

At the beginning of the new financial year the Group 
held 2,497 reservations. In the first nine weeks of the 
new financial year, which includes a typically quiet 
August period, reservations are almost 11% ahead 
of the same period last year. Whilst global economic 
conditions remain uncertain the Group continues 
to focus on the delivery of the same three-pronged 
strategy of increasing volume, average selling price and 
operating margin. Bellway has started the year with 
205 sales outlets and, subject to necessary planning 
consents, we are targeting to increase this, and 
consequently volumes, by up to 5% during the course 
of the current financial year. The combination of 
product mix between houses and apartments is unlikely 
to change drastically, but as new outlets come on to the 
market we anticipate that average selling prices and 
operating margins will improve further. Delivery of these 
improvements, combined with a strong balance sheet 
and healthy forward order book, will place Bellway 
in a position to further enhance shareholder return 
in the future. 

John K Watson

Chief Executive 
17 October 2011

SpacE1, whitechapel, london Borough of Tower Hamlets.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

12

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

EvERGREEN EaST, 
lEEdS, wEST YoRkSHiRE.

an exclusive development of contemporary 2, 
3, 4 and 5 bedroom homes situated at the 
heart of the leeds New Forest village.

Number of homes on this development

69

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

13

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Business Review
Corporate Responsibility Policy

Through sustainable construction we aim to create new 
communities and lasting environments for people now 
and in the future.

Bellway believes that its reputation is critical to the 
creation of long-term value for its shareholders. We 
recognise that financial success is reinforced by our 
behaviour beyond the balance sheet. Protecting and 
enhancing our reputation and social licence to operate 
are significant elements of sustained financial success.

At Bellway, the term Corporate Responsibility describes 
how we manage the environmental, social and 
economic effects of our business and how these affect 
our employees, customers, shareholders, suppliers, the 
communities where we work and the environment that 
we operate in, and goes beyond our legal or regulatory 
obligations. This policy sets out how we will operate and 
drives the Group’s corporate responsibility activity.

Through Bellway’s commitment to corporate 
responsibility we will: 

	engage and respond to stakeholders, including 

shareholders, employees, customers, government 
and communities that we affect.

	comply with all relevant legislation as a minimum 

standard.

	work towards recognised good practice in 
sustainability and corporate responsibility.

	treat all employees fairly and invest in training for 
the long-term to bring out the best in our people.

	provide a healthy and safe environment in which 
to work through an effective health and safety 
management system. 

	demonstrate continual improvement in our approach 

to sustainable developments (in both design and 
practice).

	recognise and respond to the challenges and 

opportunities that are presented by climate change.

	invest in the communities we develop in a way that 

contributes to local community needs.

	manage our environmental footprint and aim to 

enhance our performance in areas where we operate, 
particularly in relation to energy and waste.

	consider and respond to the social and environmental 
effects of the homes we develop and communities 
that we create.

	improve internal and external awareness of our 

corporate responsibility programmes and initiatives.

	report regularly to the Board and external 

stakeholders on performance using sustainability 
indicators.

The following structure has been put in place to achieve 
these commitments:

	the Chief Executive is responsible for this policy and 
advises the Board on all corporate responsibility 
matters.

	the Chief Executive is supported by the CSR Group 
which includes senior employees from within the 
Group who are responsible for the development and 
review of this policy.

	the finance directors or managers of each regional 
division are responsible for implementation and 
reporting on performance. 

Bellway is committed to reporting annually on its 
approach to corporate responsibility and has established 
key performance indicators to enable others to judge 
our performance. This policy does not replace existing 
policies on environment, health and safety and wood 
procurement, but has been developed to work in 
conjunction with them. All policies are available on the 
Bellway website www.bellway.co.uk and are reviewed 
annually. 

Heritage Park, duston, Northamptonshire.

wendover Rise, wendover, Buckinghamshire.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

14

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Business Review
2011 Corporate Social Responsibility Statement

The business environment is constantly evolving and recent years have 
seen an increasing emphasis on corporate social responsibility (“CSR”). 
This evolution has been reflected in mounting pressure on business for 
greater transparency and accountability in environmental and social 
performance alongside economic performance. 
We have been reporting openly on the CSR aspects 
of our business since 2003. During that time we have 
worked with our stakeholders and established 
mechanisms through which they can be involved in 
our environmental and social strategy. The following 
paragraphs exhibit some of the work that has been 
undertaken this year and provides a glimpse of our 
approach towards developing sustainable communities.

Our development in Chrisp Street, Poplar, east London, 
will utilise a CHP system to heat 117 homes. CHP 
provides similar reductions in CO2 emissions to biomass 
due to the co-generation of heat and electricity, thus 
displacing and reducing the need for electricity from the 
National Grid.

Selecting Responsible Supply Chain Partners

Saving Energy 

On the edge of Castle Bromwich in the West Midlands, 
our Oaklands development features a range of homes 
where we have installed solar panels and rainwater 
harvesting systems. Rainwater harvesting can reduce 
water consumption by up to 50%. The rainwater which 
is collected from roofs is stored in underground tanks 
and is used in toilets and for garden irrigation. Systems 
such as these can achieve and maintain excellent water 
quality with a minimum of maintenance as well as 
reducing utility bills.

At Alston Grange in Chelmsford, Essex, we are creating 
a new residential quarter comprising 22 new homes 
incorporating photovoltaic panels on the roofs. These 
panels generate electricity for the homes during daylight 
hours and have the capacity of returning unused 
electricity to the National Grid. We estimate that 
residents at Alston Grange will save around £350 per 
year on their fuel bill. In addition, the renewable 
technology achieves a 10% reduction in carbon 
emissions. 

In higher density developments, particularly in our 
Thames Gateway division, we have adopted an energy 
strategy that relies upon generating energy using 
biomass boilers and combined heat and power (“CHP”) 
technology. In Whitechapel, east London, we are using 
a biomass boiler in our SpacE1 development to heat 
214 homes. This will reduce CO2 emissions by 23% 
and save around 93,000 kilograms of CO2 per year. 

Housing currently produces around one-third of the 
UK’s CO2 emissions. In working towards reducing our 
carbon footprint we work closely with our supply chain 
partners to maximise energy savings. One of our 
principal suppliers of kitchen furniture is in the process 
of commissioning a two megawatt wind turbine at their 
production facility in Yorkshire, which will make the 
facility energy neutral. The same supplier employs 
delivery vehicles that have been engineered to convert 
nitrogen oxides into harmless nitrogen and water. 
Their kitchen carcasses are made from 100% recycled 
materials and all timber based materials are sourced 
from guaranteed Forest Stewardship Council (“FSC”) 
sustainable forests.

Our supplier of underground drainage systems has 
recently introduced a new and innovative technology 
called Recycore. This results in the manufacture of a 
multilayered pipe that reduces the use of virgin materials 
in its products so that they can be manufactured with 
50% recycled material that is sourced from old UPVC 
window frames, pipes and fascia boards. Recycore offers 
a 50% reduction of virgin UPVC usage in favour of 
recycled material and we estimate, based upon 2011 
building levels, that the amount of virgin UPVC used will 
fall by 144.5 tonnes in 2012.

Supporting Training 

In addition to our own training programmes, periodically 
we are asked by schools and colleges to host visits. 
Earlier this year students from Harrogate College visited 
our Edison Fields development in Guiseley, Yorkshire. 

Charity bike ride organised by staff from our wales division.

Public consultation.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

15

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

The students who are studying for a diploma in joinery 
and carpentry were able to view the construction 
process at close quarters which assisted their classroom 
work. 

Berkshire areas. The new centre will be able to offer MS 
sufferers treatments including oxygen therapy, massage, 
counselling, acupuncture, reflexology, speech therapy 
and physiotherapy.

Supporting the Community 

Bioremediation

The Government’s Localism Bill is designed to boost 
development and provide local communities with 
added benefits. We welcome the Government’s 
intention to reform the planning system, ensuring that 
planning decisions involve local people. In response to 
this we are developing initiatives to support a 
community focused approach to formulating 
development plans. 

Arising from the granting of planning permissions, this 
year Bellway has contributed a total £30.9 million to 
local communities through Section 106 planning 
agreements. By way of an example, our Poppyfields 
development at Newton in Nottingham involves the 
construction of a new community comprising 83 homes. 
Arising from the development, £750,000 has been used 
to deliver new affordable housing, educational 
improvements and improve traffic management in the 
wider community as well as providing a greater variety 
of housing stock for the region. 

In the face of a challenging market, and in conjunction 
with Thurrock Thames Gateway Development 
Corporation, we have pioneered an agreement to 
develop both affordable and private housing whereby 
the landowner is paid on the sale of the homes, thus 
mitigating the initial costs of the development and 
enabling the building work to be brought forward.

“By adopting a new and more flexible approach as 
to how the land transaction is structured in the 
development process we have been able to enter 
into an agreement and bring forward the 
development to create much needed housing in 
a continually improving residential location.” 
Niall Lindsay – Thurrock Thames Gateway 
Development Corporation’s Chief Executive.

In Bedford we have commenced work on the former 
RAF Cardington site. In the future, this old airbase will 
be transformed into a new 970 home community. This 
year, as part of the regeneration of the site, we have 
opened a new Cadet Centre for the Air Cadets and 
begun the regeneration of the old Shorts Building that 
will provide community facilities, including a Sure Start 
Nursery, community training centre and IT suite as well 
as residential accommodation on the upper floors.

In Wendover, Buckinghamshire, we are developing a 
new community comprising 400 new homes. As part 
of the development process we are also contributing 
£750,000 towards the cost of building a new Multiple 
Sclerosis (“MS”) Centre to replace an existing building. 

The new 14,000 square feet centre is significantly larger 
and will provide much enhanced services to MS 
sufferers in the Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and 

At Barking Riverside in east London, we have been 
working with our partners, The London Wildlife Trust 
and the architectural practice Make:Good, along with 
local volunteers, to create the largest bee house in the 
world. Solitary bees that make up 90% of our bee 
population are in decline as a result of the increased use 
of pesticides. At Barking Riverside, using wood and 
bamboo to mimic a natural habitat, we have created a 
178 square feet bee house. We have also created a new 
habitat for a colony of water voles that were living on 
the site. The water voles were successfully relocated 
following an agreed strategy with the Environment 
Agency, and specialist ecologists were brought in to 
manage the relocation process.

Charitable Giving Examples

Our employees are involved in a diverse range of social 
and charitable initiatives, which see them supporting 
schools and charities alike. In our Yorkshire division, as 
a result of dress down days, £505 was raised for the 
Make-A-Wish Foundation, and in the West Midlands 
division our employees came together to raise £1,400 
for the Cancer Ward at Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth 
Hospital. In Wales a team from Bellway cycled the 
entire length of Wales to raise £8,000 to support a 
school that takes care of children suffering from autism. 
This year, as a Group, Bellway has made charitable 
donations of £20,716.

Summary

To be successful, any environmental policy and social 
programme must link aspirations with practical 
objectives. In Bellway’s case this means understanding 
the environmental and social issues which affect our 
business and working with the local community to build 
vibrant and sustainable places to live and work. The 
aforementioned case studies provide some examples 
of our approach to meeting our corporate responsibility 
objectives; further information is available on our CSR 
website www.bellway.co.uk/corporate-responsibility. 

Bee house, Barking Riverside, london Borough of Barking  
and dagenham.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

16

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Business Review
Key Performance Indicators (Non-Financial)

We use these non-financial KPIs to help us measure our performance against our CSR objectives. Financial KPIs are set out at page 1 of this Report.

Key Performance Indicators

Commercial

Total number of homes sold
Number of homes sold to Registered Social Landlords
Number of plots with planning permission
Number of sites registered with the Considerate Constructors Scheme(2)
Number of homes built to Lifetime Home Standards(3)

Environmental

Percentage of homes developed on brownfield sites
Number of homes per hectare
Number of EcoHomes with at least “Very Good” rating
Number of homes built to Code Level 3(1)
Number of homes built to Code Level 4(4)
Number of homes built with renewable energy technology
Percentage of homes built using timber frame
Number of homes built using thin joint technology(4)
Number of homes with energy efficient lighting(4)
Number of homes with rainwater harvesting(4)
Measure of waste (number of 7m3 skips per home sold)
Number of current sites with Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (“SUDS”) 
designed into the scheme(2)
Number of trees planted(3)
Number of current sites with car clubs(2)
Number of homes with access to a cycle store(4)
Number of compliance breaches

Employees

Employee turnover(5) 
Number of site workers (including sub-contractors) accredited with 
Construction Skills Certification Scheme (“CSCS”) cards
Number of apprentices employed
Number of NHBC Pride in the Job Awards received

Health and Safety

Financial year ended 31 July

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

7,638
900
23,500
–
–

6,556
1,337
22,500
–
–

4,380
980
19,260
56
–

81%
66
326
–
–
17
34%
–
–
–
5.70

–
–
–
–
9

79%
63
1,194
48
–
307
30%
–
–
–
4.30

–
–
–
–
6

84%
67
786
428
–
636
23%
–
–
–
3.60

77
–
5
–
0

4,595
943
17,602
89
690

80%
63
480
1,186
–
1,653
15%
–
–
–
3.78

86
8,484
7
–
1

4,922
1,079
18,086
108
1,119

77%
59
693
1,371
36
2,092
13%
126
3,973
224
3.44

89
8,843
6
2,278
1

25.6%

33.7%

65.2%

21.0%

13.8%

783
203
19

1,042
149
20

1,793
30
15

3,489
33
18

4,037
43
22

Rate of over three-day lost time accidents per 100,000 employees
Number of health and safety prosecutions

957.78
0

980.18
0

973.24
1

945.18
0

767.90
0

Creating community value

Financial contributions under Section 106 agreements(1) 

Stakeholder

Percentage of customers who would recommend Bellway to a friend (annualised)(1)
Number of suppliers/contractors who have worked for 
Bellway for at least three years(3)

–

–

–

£17.0m

£2.0m

£13.0m

£30.9m

80%

89%

86%

91%

–

–

2,777

2,916

(1)  2008 was the first year of reporting.

(2)  2009 was the first year of reporting.

(3)  2010 was the first year of reporting.

(4)  2011 is the first year of reporting.

(5)  Includes redundancies.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
 
 
17

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

homes built to Level 3 of the 
Code for Sustainable Homes

1,37118

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Solar panels at our development at 
Meadway Court, Forest Hall, Tyne 
and Wear. This year 2,092 of our new 
homes have had renewable energy 
technology installed.

19

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Business Review
Environmental Policy

Bellway is one of the largest housebuilding groups in the 
UK. The housebuilding process affects the environment 
by the use of land and consumption of resources 
throughout the development process. It is our objective 
to ensure that at the conclusion of a development an 
attractive and desirable new environment has been 
created that will be sustainable over time.

Recognising that we have responsibilities to both limit 
any negative effect on, and enhance, the environment, 
this statement sets out our policies for managing the 
environmental aspects across our business.

Key objectives are to:

	minimise any deleterious effects on the environment 

and where possible to seek environmental 
enhancements, concentrating on areas where there 
is most room for improvement.

	aim to meet and, where practicable, exceed all 

relevant environmental legislation and regulations.

	improve our environmental performance. 

In addition to our key objectives, the Group has 
identified a number of specific priority areas upon 
which we will be particularly focusing:

	consideration of environmental aspects in the 

selection and procurement of land for development, 
including implications for biodiversity and sustainable 
development.

	meeting and, where possible, exceeding government 
targets for the redevelopment of brownfield land.

	influencing the design of sites, housing, and fittings to 
minimise the effects on both the natural and built 
environment.

	providing environmental benefits and minimising 
nuisance arising from construction activities, and 
preventing pollution on development sites and 
surrounding areas.

	consideration of environmental issues within our 

corporate functions and everyday business decision-
making processes.

	set specific environmental objectives and periodically 

review progress against these.

The above statement will be balanced against economic 
considerations.

	ensure that Bellway’s environmental aims and their 
importance are communicated throughout the 
Group, including to appropriate sub-contractors and 
suppliers, and that a copy of this policy statement is 
displayed in each Bellway site and office.

	consider the role that Bellway can play in helping to 

contribute to the principles of sustainable 
development within the UK.

	recognise and respond to the challenges and 

opportunities that are presented by climate change. 

Solar panel installation, Cleadon Vale, Tyne and Wear.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

20

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Business Review
Group Finance Director’s Review

“the Group is able to report a 
7.1% increase in legal completions 
to 4,922 units for the year to  
31 July 2011.” 

Group Summary

Reservations in the early part of the financial year did 
not benefit from the usual degree of uplift normally 
associated with the housing market in autumn as 
uncertainties surrounding the Government’s 
Comprehensive Spending Review appeared to affect 
consumer confidence. In the period following the 
Comprehensive Spending Review, the decline in 
consumer confidence levelled out, albeit the particularly 
cold and inclement winter weather continued to affect 
site visitor rates and hence reservation rates.

Reservation rates from the beginning of January 
returned to a more normal pattern with a healthy 
spring selling season followed by a traditionally slower 
selling period throughout the summer months.

Cancellation rates have remained stable, at or around 
13% (2010 – 13%), against a backdrop of continuing 
constraints in relation to mortgage supply, particularly in 
relation to first-time buyers, where the ability to raise at 
least a 10% deposit, but more often a 20% deposit, 
continues to pose a challenge.

Despite these difficulties, the Group is able to report a 
7.1% increase in legal completions to 4,922 units for the 
year to 31 July 2011. Average selling prices have 
increased by 7.6% from £163,175 to £175,613 largely as 
a result of continuing changes in product mix towards 
more traditional two storey family housing. Revenue 

growth, combined with a greater contribution of 
completions from more recently acquired higher margin 
land, has contributed to an increase in profit before tax 
of 51.4%, from £44.4 million to £67.2 million.

Bellway continues to benefit from a strong balance 
sheet with net cash at the bank (excluding preference 
shares) of £3.4 million (2010 – £65.7 million), having 
expended £250 million on land and land creditors 
during the year. In December 2010 Bellway successfully 
renewed a bilateral borrowing facility with one of its 
major banking partners, which combined with existing 
facilities, gives the Group total facilities of £290 million 
at 31 July 2011, these being due to expire in a variety 
of tranches through to December 2015. The Group 
continues to be well placed to pursue future land 
opportunities, whilst retaining the ability to respond 
to any future changes in market conditions.

Group Results

Revenue from home sales increased by 15.3% from 
£749.8 million to £864.4 million, reflecting an increase in 
unit completions from 4,595 to 4,922 and the increase 
in the average selling price. 

Other revenue of £21.7 million (2010 – £18.5 million) 
has slightly increased by £3.2 million, and principally 
includes one-off land sales totalling £14.8 million. 

Total Group revenue increased by 15.3% from 
£768.3 million to £886.1 million. 

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

The Group constructs an extensive range of homes within its one UK operating segment. The following table 
provides additional information on the composition of homes sold, split between north, south, private and social.

Homes sold (number)

Private

Social

Total

North

South

Group total

2011

2,006

1,837

3,843

2010

1,650

2,002

3,652

2011

339

740

1,079

2010

335

608

943

2011

2,345

2,577

4,922

Average selling price (£000)

Private

Social

Total

North

South

Group average

2011

153.1

233.5

191.5

2010

148.1

194.1

173.3

2011

93.5

130.8

119.1

2010

104.4

134.9

124.1

2011

144.4

204.0

175.6

2010

1,985

2,610

4,595

2010

140.7

180.3

163.2

The higher average selling price is principally driven by 
continued changes in product mix, with a greater focus 
towards higher value more traditional two storey family 
housing. 

This trend is reflected in the average home size, having 
increased by over 2% from 912 square feet to 931 
square feet, with a corresponding reduction in the 
proportion of apartments sold, from 39% to 34% of 
output.

Incentives continue to be applied to the majority of sales 
with part-exchange used as a selling tool in 13% of 
completions (2010 – 11%), again reflecting the move 
towards higher value homes. 

The use of shared equity arrangements continues to be 
a useful incentive, either through the Government’s 
HomeBuy Direct initiative or Bellway’s own Sharp Start 
scheme, but its use is carefully controlled having fallen 
from 18% to 10% of completions in the year.

Gross margin has increased from 11.7% to 13.5% as the 
contribution of completions from higher margin land 
acquired since the downturn continues to increase and 
the Group trades out of lower margin land which has 
been written down.

Administrative expenses, whilst remaining static at 5% 
of revenue, have increased in absolute terms by over 
14% from £38.5 million to £44.2 million. The increase is 
a result of the Group’s additional investment in our land 
and sales teams to enable future volume and profit 
growth, whilst also facilitating larger staff bonus 
payments commensurate with enhanced divisional 
performance.

Overall the Group has delivered an operating profit 
of £75.2 million (2010 – £51.3 million) representing 
a margin of 8.5% (2010 – 6.7%).

Net asset value per ordinary share (p)

Dividend per ordinary share (p)

Earnings per ordinary share* (p) 

903

871

839

856

888

43.1

146.1

104.2

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2007

2008

24.1

9.0

10.0

12.5

41.5

29.7

2010

2011

17.7
2009

Operating margin* (%)

Profit before taxation* (£m)

Revenue (£m)

18.7

16.1

234.8

165.7

6.7

6.7

8.5

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2007

2008

* Pre-exceptional items.

29.8
2009

44.4

2010

67.2

2011

1,354.0

1,149.5

768.3

683.8

886.1

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

21

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

22

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Business Review
Group Finance Director’s Review (continued)

Finance Costs

Balance Sheet

Net finance costs have increased by 18% from 
£6.8 million to £8.0 million. The fees associated with 
the new £150 million bilateral facility have been fully 
expensed during the period. 

The Group has benefited from a very modest net debt 
position for the majority of the year. Net interest 
payable on bank loans and overdrafts of £2.8 million 
(2010 – £0.8 million) largely represents commitment 
fees payable on undrawn facilities and the costs 
associated with the refinancing of the bank facilities.

Notional interest on land acquired on deferred payment 
terms has fallen slightly by £1.4 million from £4.5 million 
to £3.1 million, whilst the interest payable on the 
Group’s £20 million preference shares, repayable in 
April 2014, remains at £1.9 million.

Taxation

The effective income tax rate is 25.3% of profit before 
tax (2010 – 19.4%) and compares favourably to the 
Group’s standard tax rate for the year of 27.3% (2010 
– 28.0%). In the prior year ended 31 July 2010 the 
Group benefited from enhanced claims for qualifying 
expenditure on remediated land, relating to current and 
prior periods. The legacy of these outstanding claims 
was fully agreed with HMRC in the year ended 31 July 
2011, and this has resulted in a further reduction in the 
overall tax charge by £1.1 million in the year.

The Group has fully utilised all historic losses.

Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per ordinary share amount to 41.5p 
compared to 29.7p in 2010, an increase of almost 40%.

The balance sheet remains strong with net cash 
(excluding preference shares) of £3.4 million at 31 July 
2011 (2010 – net cash of £65.7 million excluding 
preference shares). Inventories have shown a measured 
increase, up from £1,148.7 million to £1,270.3 million as 
a result of a disciplined approach to land buying and an 
increase in finished goods stock as the Group finds that 
finished product is easier to sell. In addition, new site 
openings have contributed to the increase in work in 
progress. Following a full review of inventories at 31 July 
2011 the Board can report that there are no further 
exceptional write downs or write backs.

The Group has continued to use shared equity 
incentives, however, the use of this type of incentive has 
been tightly controlled during the year. The Board have 
reassessed the carrying value of the resultant debt, 
shown as other financial assets on the balance sheet, 
which, at £33.5 million (2010 – £32.7 million), represents 
a significant discount to vacant possession value 
(note 14).

Land payables have increased slightly from £61.9 million 
to £83.2 million reflecting the increased land buying 
activity in the period.

The valuation of the Bellway p.l.c. 1972 Pension Scheme 
(the “Scheme”) at 31 July 2011 shows a slight reduction 
in the deficit, calculated in accordance with IAS 19, 
of £0.3 million from £8.7 million to £8.4 million.

The increase in Group net assets of £38.5 million from 
£1,034.8 million to £1,073.3 million comprises profit 
after tax for the year of £50.1 million, a net reduction 
in pension liabilities of £0.2 million after tax, ordinary 
dividends paid of £12.5 million, and other share issues 
and share option movements through reserves 
of £0.7 million.

Birchwood, Cowdenbeath, Fife.

Park Mews, Mapperley, Northamptonshire.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

23

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Treasury

Interest Rate Risk

Other than the proceeds obtained from the issue of 
ordinary shares and reinvestment of retained profits, 
the Group’s activities are financed principally through 
a combination of its £20.0 million preference shares, 
redeemable in April 2014, bank borrowings and cash 
in hand.

The Group’s attitude to interest rate risk is influenced 
by the existing and forecast conditions prevailing at the 
time that each new interest-bearing instrument is 
entered into. This will determine, amongst other things, 
the term and whether a fixed or floating interest rate is 
obtained. 

Share Price and Net Asset Value

The share price at 31 July 2011 was 660.00p (2010 – 
579.50p). This compares with a book net asset value per 
ordinary share at 31 July 2011 of 888p (2010 – 856p).

Dividend

The Board is proposing an increase in the final dividend 
of 31.3% to 8.8p per ordinary share (2010 – 6.7p) giving 
a total dividend for the year of 12.5p compared to 10.0p 
for 2010. The total dividend is covered over 3.3 times 
(2010 – 3.0 times).

Alistair M Leitch

Finance Director 
17 October 2011

The Group’s bank borrowing facilities comprise 
medium-term loans, short-term floating rate loans and 
overdrafts. In addition, the Group often obtains 
deferred payment terms in its contracts for land 
purchases. 

Bank facilities expire during the course of the following 
financial years:

By 31 July 2012
By 31 July 2013
By 31 July 2014
By 31 July 2015
By 31 July 2016
TOTAL

£35 million
£85 million
£45 million
£95 million
£30 million
£290 million

The Board remains satisfied with the level of its 
borrowing facilities.

Treasury Policy and Liquidity Risk

The Group’s treasury policy has, as its principal 
objective, the maintenance of flexible bank facilities in 
order to meet anticipated borrowing requirements. 
An internal cash forecasting system enables the Group 
to plan and assess its future treasury needs.

Short-term cash surpluses are placed on deposit. Other 
than disclosed above, there are no financial instruments, 
derivatives or commodity contracts used.

Woodlands, Bushey, Hertfordshire.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

24

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Business Review
Operating Risk Statement

Risk is a natural part of any business. The management of risk is a key operating component of the Group. 
The manner in which this is carried out is highly important to the long-term success of the business. The Group 
has identified, evaluated and put in place strategies to mitigate the principal risks faced by the business, shown in the 
table below:

Area of Risk

Description of Risk

Mitigation of Risk 

Land

Planning

Sales

The inability to source suitable land at 
satisfactory margins would have a 
detrimental effect on the Group’s land 
bank and consequently, its future 
success. 

  Endeavour to ensure that a land bank with planning 
permission for at least three years’ construction 
programme is in place on a rolling basis. 

  Thorough pre-purchase due diligence and viability 

assessments. 

  Authorisation of land purchases in line with robust 

Group procedures.

Delays and the increased complexity 
of the planning process hampers and 
slows the Group’s growth prospects.

  Centralised and Regional Planning Directors provide 

advice and support to divisions to assist with 
progressing the planning permission process.

Ensuring that the effects of any 
diminution in the size of the 
marketplace, the ability of prospective 
customers to access credit facilities or 
the sales prices achieved are managed 
in such a way as to limit any adverse 
financial or operational effects on the 
Group’s performance.

Construction Ensuring that appropriately skilled 

personnel are available and that 
suitable materials are also available  
at the right price.

  In consultation with Head Office, local divisional 

management determines product range and pricing 
strategy commensurate with regional market 
conditions. 

  Use of sales incentives where appropriate to 

encourage the selling process, such as part-exchange 
and Express Mover. 

  Use of government-backed schemes to encourage 

home ownership where appropriate. 

   Ensuring that construction rates are managed to 

ensure stock availability matches sales rates.

  Identifying training needs and allocating appropriate 

resources to training. 

  Ensuring systems are in place for engaging, monitoring 
and controlling work carried out by sub-contractors. 

  Ensuring competitive reward systems are in place. 
  Ensuring Group purchasing arrangements are in place 

to secure materials at competitive prices.

Environment Housebuilding has a significant effect 
on the environment. It is important 
that the effects of the Group’s 
developments are, as far as possible, 
positive rather than negative.

  It is our objective to ensure that at the conclusion of a 

development an attractive and sustainable new 
environment has been created that will continue over 
time. See our Environmental Policy on page 19, or our 
website at www.bellway.co.uk, for further information.

Health and 
Safety

It is important to ensure that the 
Group has adequate systems in place 
to mitigate, as far as possible, the 
dangers to people inherent in the 
construction process.

  The Board considers health and safety issues at each 

Board meeting. 

  Regular visits to sites by senior management 
(independent of our divisions) and external 
consultants to monitor health and safety standards 
and performance against the Group’s health and 
safety policies and procedures.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

Area of Risk

Description of Risk

Mitigation of Risk 

Personnel

Information 
Technology

Attracting and retaining the correct 
personnel is key to the Group’s 
long-term success. Failure to do so will 
severely affect the Group’s ability to 
perform in a highly competitive market.

It is vital that the Group has suitable 
systems in place to ensure that, as far 
as possible, a smooth flow of 
information is transmitted throughout 
the Group and that the risk of system 
loss is mitigated and supported by 
appropriate contingency plans.

Asset 
Protection 

The way in which the Group carries 
out its operations can have a material 
effect on the value of its assets.

Treasury 
Management

Ensuring suitable financial resources, at 
appropriate costs, are in place to meet 
Group requirements.

Legal and 
Regulatory 
Compliance

Disadvantageous contractual 
obligations, regulatory fines or adverse 
publicity by failing to comply with 
current laws and regulations or failing 
to have appropriately worded 
contracts in place.

  The Group offers competitive salary and benefits 

packages. 

  Divisional training plans are in place. 
  Succession planning for key posts. 
  98% of site workers (including sub-contractors) are 

fully accredited under CSCS. 

  Group-wide systems are in place which are centrally 
controlled with an outsourced support function  
in place.

  The Group prepares viability assessments on all of its 
land purchases and construction projects, and keeps 
these under regular review to protect, wherever 
possible, the value of its assets.

  Central negotiation and control of banking facilities 
to ensure liquidity and debt levels are appropriate. 

  Facilities distributed across various sources. 
  Careful management and monitoring of cash forecasts.

  Central secretariat, human resources and legal 

functions advise divisions on compliance and ensure 
policies and procedures are kept up to date to 
minimise risk of non-compliance.

In addition, the Board ensures that adequate insurance cover is maintained to underpin and support the many areas 
in which the Group is exposed to risk of loss. 

25

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

26

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Governance
Board of Directors
As at 17 October 2011

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

Howard C Dawe
Date of Birth: 7 April 1944

Mr Dawe joined Bellway in 1961, was appointed a director in 1977 and was 
appointed Chief Executive in 1985. In May 1997 he was appointed Acting 
Chairman and Chairman on 1 November 1999 when he relinquished the 
role of Chief Executive. On 1 November 2004, Mr Dawe became 
non-executive Chairman. He is Chairman of the Nomination Committee.

John K Watson 
Date of Birth: 21 March 1954

Mr Watson, a Chartered Surveyor, joined Bellway in 1978. He was later 
appointed Managing Director of the North East division, a position which 
he held for 12 years. He joined the Board as Technical Director in 1995 
and became Chief Executive on 1 November 1999. He is Chairman of the 
Board Committee on Non-Executive Directors’ Remuneration.

Alistair M Leitch 
Date of Birth: 14 February 1954

Mr Leitch qualified as a Chartered Accountant in 1977 and joined Bellway in 
1981. He has held a number of senior positions in the Company including, 
from 1996, the post of Group Chief Accountant. He was appointed Finance 
Director on 1 August 2002. He is a member of the Board Committee on 
Non-Executive Directors’ Remuneration.

Edward (Ted) F Ayres 
Date of Birth: 10 October 1962

Mr Ayres joined Bellway in January 2002 as a divisional Managing Director, 
becoming Southern Regional Chairman in 2006, and was appointed to the 
Board as Group Operations Director on 1 August 2011. He is a member 
of the Board Committee on Non-Executive Directors’ Remuneration. 

Peter M Johnson 
Date of Birth: 17 April 1948

Mr Johnson, a Chartered Accountant, was appointed a non-executive 
director on 1 November 2003. He had been, on his retirement in September 
2000, a partner in KPMG for 23 years. He is a non-executive director of 
Sunderland Marine Mutual Insurance Company Limited and Honorary 
Treasurer of the University of Newcastle upon Tyne. He became senior 
independent non-executive director on 16 January 2009 and is Chairman of 
the Audit Committee and is also a member of both the Board Committee 
on Executive Directors’ Remuneration and the Nomination Committee.

27

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Mike R Toms 
Date of Birth: 1 July 1953

Mr Toms was appointed a non-executive director on 1 February 2009. 
He is currently a non-executive director of Birmingham Airport Holdings 
Limited. He was formerly an executive director of BAA plc and was 
non-executive Chairman of Northern Ireland Electricity plc. He was also 
a non-executive director of Viridian Group PLC and UK Coal PLC. He is 
a member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (MRICS) and 
a member of the Royal Town Planning Institute (MRTPI). He is Chairman 
of the Board Committee on Executive Directors’ Remuneration, and 
a member of the Audit and Nomination Committees of the Board.

John A Cuthbert obe
Date of Birth: 9 February 1953

Mr Cuthbert, a Chartered Accountant, was appointed a non-executive 
director on 1 November 2009. Mr Cuthbert worked in the water industry 
from 1991 to 2010, when he retired as Managing Director of Northumbrian 
Water Group plc, having formerly been Managing Director of North East 
Water plc and Managing Director of Essex and Suffolk Water plc. He is 
Chairman of Castle View Enterprise Academy in Sunderland. He is a 
member of the Audit and Nomination Committees and the Board 
Committee on Executive Directors’ Remuneration.

Group Company Secretary

G Kevin Wrightson
Date of Birth: 27 October 1954

Mr Wrightson, a Chartered Secretary, joined Bellway in 1990. He has held 
senior posts within the Group, including that of Deputy Group Secretary, 
before being appointed as Group Company Secretary on 1 August 2002.

Advisers

Group Company Secretary  
and Registered Office
G K Wrightson FCIS  
Bellway p.l.c.  
Seaton Burn House  
Dudley Lane, Seaton Burn  
Newcastle upon Tyne  
NE13 6BE  
Registered number 1372603

Registrars and  
Transfer Office 
Capita Registrars Limited 
The Registry 
34 Beckenham Road 
Beckenham 
Kent  
BR3 4TU

Financial Advisers 
N M Rothschild & Sons Limited

Stockbrokers 
Citigroup Global Markets Limited

Bankers 
Barclays Bank PLC  
Lloyds Banking Group plc

Auditors 
KPMG Audit Plc

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

28

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Governance
Report of the Directors

The directors have pleasure in submitting the Annual Report and Accounts of Bellway p.l.c. to the shareholders for the year ended 31 July 2011.

Principal Activities
The Company is a holding company, owning subsidiary undertakings which continue to be engaged principally in housebuilding in the 
United Kingdom (“UK”).

Performance and Prospects
A review of the Group’s performance and prospects that fulfils the requirements of the business review can be found in the Chairman’s Statement 
on pages 2 and 3, the Chief Executive’s Operating Review on pages 6 to 11, the Corporate Responsibility Policy on page 13, the 2011 Corporate 
Social Responsibility Statement on pages 14 and 15, the Environmental Policy on page 19 and the Group Finance Director’s Review on pages 20 to 
23. In addition, information in respect of the principal operating risks of the business is set out in the Operating Risk Statement on pages 24 and 25.

Results and Dividends
The profit for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent company amounts to £50.1 million (2010 – £35.8 million).

Ordinary Dividends
The directors have proposed a final ordinary dividend for the year ended 31 July 2011 of 8.8p per share. This has not been included within creditors 
as it was not approved before the year end. Dividends paid during the year comprise a final dividend of 6.7p per share in respect of the previous year 
ended 31 July 2010, together with an interim dividend in respect of the year ended 31 July 2011 of 3.7p per share.

The directors recommend payment of the final dividend on Wednesday 18 January 2012 to shareholders on the Register of Members at the close 
of business on Friday 16 December 2011.

Directors
All the directors of the Company, who are shown on pages 26 and 27, served throughout the year, with the exception of Mr Ayres who was 
appointed on 1 August 2011. Mr Stoker was a director at the start of the year and retired on 31 July 2011.

The UK Corporate Governance Code includes a provision that all directors should be subject to annual re-election. As a result, all of the directors, 
with the exception of Mr Leitch, retire from the Board and offer themselves for re-election at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting (“AGM”). 
Mr Leitch retires from the Board on 31 January 2012 and is therefore not retiring and seeking re-election at the AGM. The directors’ biographies are 
shown on pages 26 and 27. None of the executive directors hold external directorships.

Following formal rigorous evaluation, the Chairman, acting on behalf of the Board, is satisfied as to the effectiveness and commitment of all of the 
directors.

Directors’ Contracts
Details of the terms of appointment of all the directors are given in the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration on pages 36 and 37.

Directors’ Interests
The directors’ interests in the share capital of the Company and in share ownership plan arrangements are given in the Report of the Board 
on Directors’ Remuneration on pages 35 to 42.

Takeovers Directive
The information for shareholders required pursuant to the relevant companies’ legislation which implements the Takeovers Directive is disclosed 
in this report and in the Shareholder Information section on page 79.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

29

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Notifiable Shareholders’ Interests
As at 31 July 2011 and at the date of this report the Company had been notified of the following interests amounting to 3% or more of the voting 
rights in the issued ordinary share capital of the Company:

BlackRock Inc

Fidelity International Ltd/FMR Corp

JP Morgan Chase & Co

AXA Framlington Investment Management

Polaris Capital Management LLC

Capital Group International Inc

Legal & General Group plc

HBOS plc

Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited

Third Avenue Management LLC

As at 31 July 2011

As at date of this report

Number of 
shares with 
voting rights

10,000,579

9,300,000

5,712,902

5,603,638

4,897,018

4,831,994

4,545,633

4,261,453

3,890,282

3,668,120

% total voting 
rights

Number of 
shares with 
voting rights

% total voting 
rights

8.28

7.70 

4.73 

4.64 

4.05 

4.00 

3.76 

3.53 

3.22

3.04

13,183,615

9,300,000

5,712,902

5,603,638

4,897,018

10.91

7.70

4.73

4.64

4.05

N/A

Below 3.00

4,545,633

4,261,453

3,890,282

3,668,120

3.76

3.53

3.22

3.04

Corporate Governance
Introduction
The Board acknowledges the importance of, and is committed to, the principle of achieving and maintaining a high standard of corporate governance. 
This report, together with the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration, as detailed on pages 35 to 42, describes how the Principles of Good 
Governance, which are set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code, are applied by the Group.

Statement of Compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code
The Board considers that it has complied with the detailed provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code throughout the year to 31 July 2011 
and up to the date of this report. The UK Corporate Governance Code is publicly available free of charge from FRC publications, tel: 020 8247 1264, 
e-mail: customer.services@cch.co.uk and online at: www.frcpublications.com.

Statement about Applying the Principles of Good Governance
The Group has applied the Principles of Good Governance, including both the Main Principles and the Supporting Principles, by complying with the 
UK Corporate Governance Code as reported above. Further explanations of how the Main Principles and Supporting Principles have been applied 
are set out below and, in connection with the directors’ remuneration, in the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration. 

The Chairman’s Statement, the Chief Executive’s Operating Review and the Group Finance Director’s Review present a balanced and 
comprehensive assessment of the Group’s position and prospects.

The Board
At the date of this report the Board consists of seven directors whose names, responsibilities and other details appear on pages 26 and 27. Three of 
the directors are executive and four of the directors, including the Chairman, are non-executive. The Board discharges its responsibilities by providing 
entrepreneurial leadership of the Company within a framework of prudent and effective controls, which enables risk to be assessed and managed. 
It sets the Company’s strategic aims, ensures that the necessary financial and human resources are in place for the Company to meet its objectives 
and reviews management performance. It also defines the Company’s values and standards and ensures that its obligations to its shareholders are 
understood and met.

The Board has adopted a schedule of matters which are specifically reserved for its decision which includes various matters to do with Companies 
Acts and other legal requirements, listing requirements, Board membership and Board Committees, management, corporate governance, 
employment, financial and other miscellaneous items. In addition, it has a series of matters that are dealt with at regular Board meetings including an 
operational review, a financial review, strategy, land acquired, major projects, personnel, corporate governance, internal control, risk and health and 
safety. It has also adopted a framework of delegated commercial and operational authorities which define the scope of powers delegated to 
management below Board level.

All directors have access to the advice and services of the Group Company Secretary and all the directors may take independent professional advice 
at the Group’s expense where they judge it necessary to discharge their responsibility as directors.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

30

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Governance
Report of the Directors (continued)

Board Effectiveness
The Chairman is responsible for leading the Board and ensuring it operates effectively. The directors possess an appropriate balance of skills and 
experience to meet the requirements of the business.

During the year there were ten Board meetings, three Audit Committee meetings, six meetings of the Board Committee on Executive Directors’ 
Remuneration, one meeting of the Board Committee on Non-Executive Directors’ Remuneration and four Nomination Committee meetings. 
The full Board aims to visit at least two divisions each year, and last year visited the North East, South East and Wessex divisions, as well as receiving 
presentations at Board meetings from divisional senior management.

There were no absences from any Board or Committee meetings by any director.

During the year the non-executive directors met without the executive directors on two occasions, and the Chairman was not present on one 
of these occasions.

The Articles require one-third of the directors to offer themselves for re-election each year at the AGM and all directors to seek re-election at 
least every three years. The Articles also require new directors appointed since the last AGM to offer themselves for re-election at the next AGM. 
In addition, Provision B.7.1 of the UK Corporate Governance Code states that all directors should retire and offer themselves for re-election 
at each AGM.

Training and Development
The Board received appropriate training and updates on various matters relevant to its role, as and when required, during the year. Training needs 
are reviewed as part of the performance evaluation process and on an ongoing basis. Mr Ayres’ induction programme to the Board includes meetings 
with the Company’s various advisers, and he has also attended a formal training course designed specifically for new plc directors. Mr Ayres has held 
senior roles within Bellway since 2002 and is therefore well versed in the operations, practice and procedures of the Group.

Board Balance and Independence
The roles of Chairman and Chief Executive, which are recorded in writing and approved by the Board, are separate, with a clear division 
of responsibilities, ensuring a balance of responsibility and authority at the head of the Group.

The senior independent non-executive director is Mr Johnson. The senior independent non-executive director is available for shareholders 
to contact with any queries or concerns they may have.

Each of the non-executive directors, excluding the Chairman, has at all times acted independently of management and has no relationship which 
would materially affect the exercise of his independent judgement and decision-making. The Company considers all of its non-executive directors, 
excluding the Chairman, to be independent, as defined in the UK Corporate Governance Code.

Whenever any director considers that he is interested in any contract or arrangement to which the Group is or may be a party, due notice is given 
to the Board. No such instances of any significance have arisen during the year.

Board Evaluation
During the year the directors undertook an evaluation of the performance and effectiveness of the Board, its Committees and individual directors. 
The evaluation was performed using a system of self-assessment. This involved the Chairman, acting on behalf of the Board, evaluating the 
performance of the other individual directors, and the non-executive directors, led by the senior independent non-executive director, assessing 
the performance of the Chairman, taking into account the views of the executive directors. The Board, led by the Chairman, evaluated its own 
performance, and the Committees, led by the Chairman of each, evaluated their own performance.

As part of the process of ensuring Board effectiveness, the non-executive directors, led by the senior independent non-executive director, 
met without the Chairman present. Additionally, the Chairman held a meeting with the non-executive directors without the executives present. 
The Chairman also had meetings with each of the executive directors.

The Board and its Committees reviewed the results of these evaluations and are satisfied with the evidence they provided about the balance, 
effectiveness and performance of the Board and its Committees and the effectiveness and commitment of each director.

The Board Committees
The Board has formally constituted Audit, Remuneration and Nomination Committees. The terms of reference for the Audit and Nomination 
Committees and the Board Committee on Executive Directors’ Remuneration are available either on request, at the AGM or on the Company’s 
website: www.bellway.co.uk.

Audit Committee
The Audit Committee comprises three independent non-executive directors, Mr Johnson (Chairman), Mr Toms and Mr Cuthbert, who were 
members of the Committee throughout the year.

The Committee meets at least three times a year and met three times during the year under review. The Committee’s responsibilities include 
the following:

 ƒ to monitor the integrity of the financial statements of the Company and any formal announcements relating to the Company’s financial 

performance.

 ƒ to review and make recommendations in relation to the half year and annual accounts prior to submission to the Board.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

31

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

 ƒ to assess the scope and effectiveness of the systems established by management to identify, assess, manage and monitor financial and  

non-financial risks.

 ƒ to review management’s reports on the effectiveness of systems for internal financial control, financial reporting and risk management.

 ƒ to consider the appointment/re-appointment of the external auditors and assess their independence each year.

 ƒ to recommend the audit fee to the Board and pre-approve any fees in respect of non-audit services provided by the external auditors and 

to develop and monitor the Company’s policy on the provision of non-audit services by the external auditor and to ensure that the provision 
of non-audit services does not restrict the external auditors’ independence or objectivity.

 ƒ to agree the nature and scope of the audit and review the quality control procedures and steps taken by the auditors to respond to changes 

in regulatory and other requirements.

 ƒ to oversee the process for selecting the external auditors and make appropriate recommendations through the Board to the shareholders 

to consider at the AGM.

 ƒ to consider annually whether there is a need for an internal audit function and make a recommendation to the Board.

 ƒ to review the Group’s procedures for handling allegations from “whistleblowers”.

 ƒ to review annually the Group’s compliance with its Anti-Bribery Policy.

The Board believes that Mr Johnson, the Committee Chairman, has recent relevant financial experience as a Chartered Accountant. The Group 
has a written Independent Auditor Policy in place which seeks to preserve the independence of its auditors by defining those non-audit services the 
independent auditors may and may not provide. There are clearly defined levels of approval depending on the value of work to be provided. Where 
fees exceed £100,000, or where total non-audit fees equate to 100% of audit fees, Board approval would be required. In respect of any material 
project with fees in excess of £200,000 where the auditors are considered for the provision of services, this would be the subject of a competitive 
tendering process.

The Committee recommended to the Board that the external auditors should be re-appointed at the forthcoming AGM. It reached this conclusion 
based on the ongoing performance of the incumbent auditors and the competitive fee structure when compared with peer companies.

During the year the Committee met the auditors without management present on two occasions. In addition, the Committee Chairman had regular 
contact with the Finance Director and the external auditors.

Board Committee on Executive Directors’ Remuneration
The Board Committee on Executive Directors’ Remuneration comprises Mr Toms (Chairman), Mr Johnson and Mr Cuthbert, who were members 
of the Committee throughout the year.

The Committee meets at least twice a year and during the year it met on six occasions. Its duties are to review and recommend the basic salary, 
taxable benefits, terms and conditions of employment, including performance-related payments, long-term incentive plans and other benefits of the 
executive directors and the Chairman. The Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration on pages 35 to 42 contains details of directors’ 
remuneration and the Group’s policies in relation to directors’ remuneration. The Committee is also responsible, in consultation with the Chief 
Executive, for monitoring the total remuneration packages of senior executives below Board level.

Board Committee on Non-Executive Directors’ Remuneration
The Board Committee on Non-Executive Directors’ Remuneration comprises the executive directors and is chaired by Mr Watson. It meets at least 
once a year to review and recommend the terms, conditions and remuneration of the non-executive directors. Last year it met on one occasion to 
review the fees and terms of appointment of the non-executive directors.

Nomination Committee
The Nomination Committee comprises Mr Dawe (Chairman), Mr Johnson, Mr Toms and Mr Cuthbert, who were all members of the Committee 
throughout the year. The Committee’s main duties are to formulate plans for succession for both executive and non-executive directors and, 
in particular, for the key roles of Chairman and Chief Executive and to make recommendations regarding appointments to the Board.

The Committee meets at least twice a year and last year met on four occasions.

Appointments to the Board are made on merit through a formal, rigorous and transparent process against objective criteria recommended by 
the Committee, with due regard given to the benefits of diversity on the Board, including gender. The Committee also guides the whole Board in 
arranging orderly succession for appointments to the Board. The appointment of a non-executive director is for a specified term and re-appointment 
is not automatic and is made on the recommendation of the Committee. 

Other committees of the Board are formed to perform certain specific functions as required from time to time.

Directors’ Remuneration
The principles and details of directors’ remuneration are detailed in the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration on pages 35 to 42.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

32

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Governance
Report of the Directors (continued)

Accountability and Audit
The statement on going concern and the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and Accounts are shown on 
pages 33 and 43 respectively.

The Audit Committee, whose role is detailed above, has meetings at least twice a year with the Company’s auditors, KPMG Audit Plc.

Internal Control
The Board is responsible for the Group’s system of internal control and also for reviewing its effectiveness. The Board has reviewed the effectiveness 
of the system of internal control throughout the year and up to the date of approval of the Annual Report and Accounts. The system is regularly 
reviewed by the Board in accordance with the guidance contained in the Turnbull Report “Internal Control Guidance for Directors of Listed 
Companies Incorporated in the United Kingdom”. The Board acknowledges its responsibility to establish, maintain and monitor a system of internal 
control relating to operational, financial and compliance controls and risk management to safeguard the shareholders’ interests in the Company’s 
assets. This system, however, is designed to manage and meet the Group’s particular requirements and reduce the risk to which it is exposed rather 
than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives. It can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance against material 
misstatement or loss.

The Board reviews the effectiveness of the system of internal control and, in particular, it reviews the process for identifying and evaluating the 
significant risks affecting the business and the policies and procedures by which these risks are managed on an ongoing basis.

Management is responsible for the identification and evaluation of significant risks applicable to particular areas of the business together with the 
design and operation of suitable controls. These significant risks, which are described in the Operating Risk Statement on pages 24 and 25, are 
regularly assessed and cover all aspects of the business, but in particular land acquisition, planning, construction, health and safety, information and 
reporting systems, sales, environmental issues, personnel, asset protection, treasury management and legal and regulatory compliance. In addition, 
there is a responsibility to mitigate risk by the provision of adequate insurance cover and by management reporting on material changes in the 
business or external environment affecting the risk profile.

There is a system of regular reporting to the Board which provides for appropriate details and assurances on the assessment and control of risks.

The continuing role of the Board is, on a systematic and ongoing basis, to review the key risks inherent in the business, the operation of the systems 
and controls necessary to manage such risks and their effectiveness and to satisfy itself that all reasonable steps are being taken to mitigate these risks. 
The key areas of control are as follows:

 ƒ the Board has agreed a list of key risks which affect the Group and has considered the extent to which the measures taken by the Group mitigate 

those risks.

 ƒ an established monitoring structure is in place, which provides short lines of communication and easy access to members of the Board.

 ƒ delegation of clearly defined responsibilities to the Regional Chairmen and divisional boards with clear procedures and authority limits in place 

to provide and maintain effective controls across the Group.

 ƒ a comprehensive reporting system entailing annual budgets, regular forecasting and financial reporting.

 ƒ a central treasury function operates at Head Office.

 ƒ regular meetings with management attended by members of the Board to review divisional performance.

 ƒ the acquisition of land and land interests is subject to checking by management and approval by the Board to ensure that purchasing criteria 

are met.

 ƒ regular reviews of site costs and revenues by senior Head Office personnel which are reported to the Board.

 ƒ regular visits to sites by senior management and external consultants to monitor health and safety standards and performance.

 ƒ a number of the Group’s key functions are dealt with centrally. These include finance, banking and treasury, taxation, financial services, pensions, 

insurance, information technology, legal, personnel and company secretarial. 

The Company does not have a separate internal audit function and, as recommended by the UK Corporate Governance Code, the Audit 
Committee considers annually whether there is a need for such an internal audit function and makes a recommendation to the Board. During the 
year, having considered the robust systems and strong controls already present in the Group and as described above, the Audit Committee 
recommended that no separate internal audit function was presently required. The position will continue to be monitored by the Audit Committee 
on behalf of the Board.

Whistleblowing Arrangements
The Group has operated throughout the year a “whistleblowing” arrangement whereby all employees of the Group are able, via an independent 
external third party, to confidentially report any malpractice or matters of concern they have regarding the actions of management and employees. 
This facility is also available for employees to report any breaches of the Company’s Anti-Bribery Policy. The Audit Committee and the Board 
regularly review the effectiveness of this arrangement.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

33

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Relations with Shareholders
The Company encourages active dialogue with its private and institutional shareholders, both current and prospective. Meetings are held with both 
existing and prospective institutional shareholders on a regular basis and as requested. Shareholders are also kept up to date with Company affairs 
through the Annual and Half Year Reports, Trading Updates and Interim Management Statements. The AGM is used to communicate with 
institutional and private investors and their participation is encouraged by the taking of questions by the whole Board, both during, and also informally, 
before and after the meeting. The senior independent non-executive director is always available to discuss issues with current and prospective 
shareholders and institutions, as required. In addition, the whole Board is regularly updated on shareholder and investor views and activities at Board 
meetings by the Chief Executive and the Finance Director. Further information for shareholders is available under Shareholder Information on pages 
78 to 81 and also on the Company’s website at www.bellway.co.uk.

Going Concern
After making due enquiries, the directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operational existence 
for the foreseeable future. For this reason, they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the accounts as discussed further on page 50.

Employees
The Group is an equal opportunities employer. It is the Group’s policy to develop and apply, throughout the Group, procedures and practices which 
are designed to ensure that equal opportunities are provided to employees of the Group, or those who seek employment with the Group, 
irrespective of their age, colour, disability, ethnic origin, gender, marital status, nationality, parental status, race, religion, belief or sexual orientation.

All employees, whether part-time, full-time or temporary, are treated fairly and equally. Selection for employment, promotion, training or other 
matters affecting their employment is on the basis of aptitude and ability. All employees are assisted and encouraged to develop their full potential 
and the talents and resources of the workforce are fully utilised to maximise the efficiency of the organisation.

It is Group policy to give full and fair consideration to the employment needs of disabled persons (and persons who become disabled whilst 
employed by the Group) and to comply with any current legislation with regard to disabled persons. Training at each division is planned and 
monitored through an annual training plan. 

The importance of good communications with employees is recognised by the directors. Each division maintains good employee relations using 
a variety of means appropriate to its own particular needs, with guidance when necessary from Head Office. 

New employees, when eligible, are invited to join the Company’s pension and life assurance arrangements and the savings related share option 
scheme. The Company also offers a private medical scheme, childcare vouchers and personal accident insurance arrangements. In accordance with 
statutory requirements, the Company also has a designated stakeholder pension arrangement.

Environmental Issues
The Board recognises the importance of environmental issues and, when carrying out its business, endeavours to make a positive contribution to the 
quality of life, both for the present and the future. An Environmental Policy, approved by the Board, has been adopted by all trading entities within 
the Group. Environmental issues are addressed in the Corporate Responsibility Policy on page 13, the 2011 Corporate Social Responsibility 
Statement on pages 14 and 15, the Environmental Policy on page 19, and in the Corporate Social Responsibility section of the Company’s website 
www.bellway.co.uk, a copy of which is available from the Group Company Secretary at the Company’s registered office.

Health and Safety at Work
The Group promotes all aspects of health and safety throughout its operations in the interests of employees, sub-contractors and visitors to its sites 
and premises and the general public. Health and safety issues are considered at each Board meeting, and are addressed in the Chief Executive’s 
Operating Review on pages 6 to 11, in the Corporate Responsibility Policy on page 13, in the 2011 Corporate Social Responsibility Statement on 
pages 14 and 15, and in the Corporate Social Responsibility section of the Company’s website www.bellway.co.uk.

Donations
During the year the Group made no political contributions but donated £20,716 (2010 – £17,011) for charitable purposes.

Significant Relationships
The Company is party to a number of banking agreements with major clearing banks. The withdrawal of such facilities could have a material effect on 
the financing of the business. Other than the foregoing the Group has contractual and other arrangements in place with suppliers and other third 
parties which support its business activities. None of these arrangements are considered to be critical to the performance of the business.

Suppliers
The Group agrees terms and conditions under which business transactions with suppliers are conducted. The policy is that payments to suppliers are 
made in accordance with these terms and conditions, provided that the supplier is also complying with the terms and conditions. The Group’s current 
policy concerning the payment of the majority of its materials suppliers and sub-contractors is for payment to be made at the month end following 
the month of the invoice. For other supplies, particularly land, the terms are many and varied. Trade creditors due within one year at 31 July 2011 
of £80.0 million (2010 – £68.0 million) resulted in a creditor payment period of 25 days (2010 – 32 days). Land creditors due within one year were 
£57.5 million (2010 – £45.0 million). Including land creditors, the creditor payment period was 43 days (2010 – 53 days). 

The parent company had no land or trade creditors at 31 July 2011 (2010 – £nil).

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

34

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Governance
Report of the Directors (continued)

Purchase of the Company’s Own Shares
The Company was given authority at the 2011 AGM to purchase its own ordinary and preference shares. As at the date of this report no market 
purchases have been made by the Company and this authority will expire at the end of the 2012 AGM. Shareholders will be asked to renew this 
authority for a further year at the 2012 AGM. Market purchases, for which shareholder authority is not required, have been made by the trustees 
of the employee share schemes (see note 20 for further details).

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance and Indemnification of Directors
The Company carries appropriate insurance cover in respect of possible legal action being taken against its directors and senior employees, and the 
Articles provide the directors with further protection against liability to third parties, subject to the conditions set out in the Companies Act 2006. 
Such qualifying third party indemnity provision remains in force as at the date of this report.

Disclosure of all Relevant Information to Auditors
The directors who held office at the date of this report confirm that, so far as they are each aware, there is no relevant audit information of which 
the Company’s auditors are unaware and each director has taken all the steps that he ought to have taken as a director to make himself aware of any 
relevant audit information and to establish that the Company’s auditors are aware of that information.

Auditors 
In accordance with section 489 of the Companies Act 2006, a resolution for the re-appointment of KPMG Audit Plc as auditors of the Company 
is to be proposed at the forthcoming AGM. 

AGM – Special Business
Four resolutions will be proposed as special business at the AGM to be held on Friday 13 January 2012. Explanatory notes on these resolutions 
are set out in Shareholder Information on page 78.

By order of the Board

G Kevin Wrightson

Group Company Secretary  
17 October 2011

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

Governance
Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration

35

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Introduction
The remuneration of the executive directors is determined by the Board Committee on Executive Directors’ Remuneration (the “Committee”) 
within a framework set by the Board. As at the date of this report, the Committee’s members are three non-executive directors, Mr Toms 
(Chairman), Mr Johnson and Mr Cuthbert. None of the Committee members has a personal financial interest, other than as shareholders, in the 
matters to be decided. There are no conflicts of interest arising from cross-directorships and no day-to-day involvement in running the business. 
The Terms of Reference of the Committee are available on the Company’s website www.bellway.co.uk.

During the year, the Group Company Secretary attended a number of Committee meetings at the invitation of the Committee and provided advice 
on issues other than those relating to his own remuneration. The Committee also received independent external advice from Hewitt New Bridge 
Street (“HNBS”). HNBS was appointed by the Committee and does not provide any other services to the Company other than to the Board 
Committee on Non-Executive Directors’ Remuneration.

The remuneration of the non-executive directors (apart from the Chairman) is determined by the Board Committee on Non-Executive Directors’ 
Remuneration, which comprises the executive directors. The Board Committee on Non-Executive Directors’ Remuneration also receives advice 
from the Group Company Secretary and HNBS.

The Chairman’s remuneration is determined by the other non-executive directors.

Context
This year’s remuneration report is made at the end of a year which saw significant progress in the management of the business. Profit before tax 
increased from £44.4 million to £67.2 million while debt levels remained extremely low, the Group ending the year with £3.4 million of net cash, 
excluding preference shares. Customer satisfaction levels improved, as did safety performance. Succession to two key Board positions by internal 
management development was also determined. 

The appointment of two new executive directors in the 2011/12 financial year will provide an opportunity to effect some changes to remuneration 
packages and contracts. Both the new executive directors will start on basic salaries significantly below their predecessors, with a view to upward 
movement as they develop in their roles. Pension contributions will also be significantly lower than the salary supplement in lieu of pension 
contributions which are paid to Mr Watson and Mr Leitch. Both appointments will have new service contract terms reflecting best practice. 

Long-term incentive award levels will remain in line with the previous policy. The Committee, however, has also given further consideration to the 
performance targets and has consulted shareholders on possible changes to these measures. The conclusions are set out in detail in this report.

Objectives
The aim of the Committee is to ensure that the Company has competitive remuneration packages in place in order to recruit, retain and motivate 
executive directors in the overall interests of shareholders, the Company, its employees and its customers.

The Committee has set, as an objective, a policy of paying remuneration around the median of a peer group of similar UK housebuilding businesses, 
subject to experience and performance, and it is satisfied that the structure of the executives’ packages broadly achieves this objective. 
The Committee has used this comparative approach to benchmarking with caution, recognising the risk of upward only reviews of remuneration. 
The structure of the package has been designed to ensure that the performance-related elements of remuneration (annual bonus and long-term 
incentive plans (“LTIPs”)) constitute a significant proportion of an executive’s potential total remuneration package, but are only receivable if 
demanding and stretching performance targets are achieved. The Committee considers that the remuneration level and structure are fully 
competitive with the market, with a significant element of the package payable in the form of share-based incentives, subject to long-term 
performance conditions.

The structure of the performance conditions for annual bonus and long-term incentives has been designed to provide a strong link to the Company’s 
performance, namely a focus on maximising profit in a sustainable fashion and generating superior shareholder returns. This approach generates 
strong alignment of interest between senior executives and shareholders.

To improve the risk profile of the policy and in line with best practice, the Company is introducing a clawback mechanism for bonus and LTIP awards 
in respect of the executive directors and the Group Company Secretary to allow the Company, in exceptional circumstances, to clawback some or 
all of the variable components of that individual’s remuneration.

In framing the Company’s remuneration policy for executive directors, the Committee has given full consideration to the best practice provisions in 
the UK Corporate Governance Code and the Association of British Insurers’ (“ABI”) guidance. When determining the elements of remuneration for 
the executive directors, the Committee takes into consideration the pay and conditions of employees throughout the Group as a whole, paying 
particular attention to the levels of pay increase awarded to the workforce generally. All employees, including the executive directors, can join the 
Bellway p.l.c. (2003) Savings Related Share Option Scheme (“2003 SRSOS”). All employees have access to pension arrangements, most have access 
to life assurance benefits and a significant proportion of employees benefit from health insurance, company car or car allowance. The Committee is 
apprised of any significant policy changes for the workforce generally.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

36

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Governance
Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration (continued)

Summary of Remuneration Policy
The policy in relation to each component of executive remuneration is described below:

Component

Policy

Performance period

How achieved

Salary

To be market competitive. n/a

Benefits

To provide a range and 
value which is market 
competitive.

n/a

Annual Bonus

Long-term incentives 
(performance shares and 
matching shares)

1 year

3 years

To reward achievement of 
a combination of financial 
and non-financial 
operational-based 
performance targets.

To encourage long-term 
value creation, to aid 
retention, to encourage 
shareholding, and to 
promote alignment of 
interest with shareholders.

Salary levels set by reference to the mid market level of a 
peer group of similar UK housebuilding businesses, taking 
account of individual performance and experience. The 
salaries of the two new executive directors will be positioned 
below the median, with a view to progressing these over 
time as experience is gained.

Benefits to be at the mid market level of a peer group of 
similar UK housebuilding businesses, and for existing 
executives include a salary supplement in lieu of pension 
contributions, car or car allowance, life assurance, medical 
cover and permanent health insurance. The policy for new 
executive directors is that their pension contributions will 
be lower than the salary supplement in lieu of pension 
contributions which are paid to Mr Watson and Mr Leitch.

By providing the opportunity to earn a bonus of up to 100% 
of salary (120% for 2011/12) for outstanding operational 
performance, both financial and non-financial. 

By using share-based incentives with performance conditions 
which are aligned with shareholders’ interests, such as Total 
Shareholder Return (“TSR”), which are assessed over a 
three-year period.

Service Contracts and Letters of Appointment
The executive directors have service contracts with a 12-month notice period from the Company and a six-month notice period from the executive. 

For Mr Watson and Mr Leitch, on termination by the Company, an amount equivalent to one year’s salary, benefits and the average amount of the 
last two years’ annual bonus payments, would be payable. Within six months of a change of control, if either Mr Watson or Mr Leitch serves notice 
to terminate the contract, the liquidated damages payment would be triggered. The inclusion of average annual bonus in the calculation of 
compensation payable for early termination has ensured that there was variability in the potential level of compensation. In particular, after a period 
of poor performance, it could be expected that little or no bonus would be payable, reducing potential payout in these circumstances. Mr Watson 
and Mr Leitch have long service with the Company and the Committee has not considered it appropriate to re-negotiate their contracts in relation 
to this provision. 

In accordance with best practice, the service contracts of Mr Ayres, who was appointed to the Board on 1 August 2011, and Mr Adey, who will be 
appointed to the Board on 1 February 2012, will not provide for the inclusion of average bonus as part of the compensation arrangements in the 
event of early termination and will contain no liquidated damages provision.

The details of the executive directors’ service contracts are as follows:

Executive director

First appointed as a director

Current contract commencement date

J K Watson

A M Leitch

E F Ayres

1 August 1995

1 August 2002

1 August 2011

16 March 2001, amended 7 October 2009

1 September 2002, amended 7 October 2009

1 August 2011

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

37

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

All non-executive directors have letters of appointment with the Company of no more than three years with a three-month notice period by 
either side.

Non-executive director

H C Dawe

P M Johnson

M R Toms

J A Cuthbert

First appointed  
as a director

Current letter  
of appointment 
commencement date

Current letter of 
appointment expiry date

9 August 1977

1 November 2010

31 October 2013

1 November 2003

1 November 2009

31 October 2012

 1 February 2009

1 February 2009

31 January 2012

1 November 2009

1 November 2009

31 October 2012

On the expiry of his existing letter of appointment, it is the intention of the Company, following rigorous review, to issue a new letter of appointment 
to Mr Toms for a term of three years from 1 February 2012.

Salaries and Fees
Salaries are reviewed on 1 August each year, taking into account the general settlement across the Company. Any changes are implemented from 
that date.

For the year under review, the executive directors received a 2.5% increase in basic salary which reflected the average percentage increase across 
the workforce generally. For 2011/12, Mr Watson and Mr Leitch have been awarded a 3% increase in basic salary, which will also reflect the average 
percentage increase across the workforce generally.

As previously announced, Mr Stoker retired on 31 July 2011 and Mr Leitch will retire on 31 January 2012. Mr Ayres was promoted to the Board 
on 1 August 2011 and Mr Adey will be promoted to the Board on 1 February 2012. The new executive directors’ commencing salaries will be 
significantly below those of their predecessors, although it is envisaged that these will be progressively adjusted as they develop and adapt into their 
new roles. Mr Ayres’ commencing salary is £250,000.

Fee levels for non-executive directors reflect the time commitment and responsibilities of the role, including membership or chairmanship of Board 
Committees. Fees are reviewed annually, taking into account the level of fees for similar positions in comparable companies. For the year under 
review, fees were increased by around 6% to reflect the increasing responsibilities, complexity and time commitment of their role. With effect 
from 1 August 2011 fees have been increased by 3% which is in line with the average percentage increase across the workforce generally. They are 
not entitled to any benefits (with the exception of the Chairman) or pension. They do not participate in any bonus or long-term incentive plan and 
they are not entitled to compensation on termination of their agreements, other than normal notice provisions of three months’ notice given by 
either party.

Taxable Benefits
Taxable benefits provided relate to the provision of motor vehicles, telephones and private medical insurance.

Annual Bonus Scheme
For the year under review, bonuses were capped at 100% of basic salary. The performance conditions related to a stretching target range of 
operating profit (80%) and personal performance (20%), with personal performance being assessed by reference to board structure and succession 
planning, land bank management, health and safety and customer care. The Committee considers that the focus of the bonus on the Company’s 
primary short-term performance measure of operating profit provides a good link between short-term rewards and its strategy, which is to 
maximise profits sustainably. This also ensures that bonuses are affordable out of profits and there is a consistency with broader employee bonus 
payments. The focus on profitability is balanced by there being a meaningful weighting of the overall bonus on a number of core non-financial 
KPIs (the proportion of which has been increased for 2011/12) which are considered to have a strong link to profitability and long-term shareholder 
returns.

The performance conditions for the annual bonus are balanced by complementary long-term performance conditions under the Bellway p.l.c. (2004) 
Performance Share Plan (the “PSP”), discussed later in this report.

Details of the bonus payments are set out in the notes to the table of directors’ emoluments on page 40. Annual bonuses are not pensionable.

The bonus will be payable in cash, with executives having the opportunity to invest up to 25% of their net cash bonus in Bellway shares held in the 
Bellway Employee Share Trust (1992) (the “Trust”) under the terms of the Bellway p.l.c. (2008) Share Matching Plan (the “SMP”).

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

38

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Governance
Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration (continued)

As explained above, in relation to the two new executive directors joining the Board in the 2011/12 financial year, the Committee is keen to ensure 
that the total earnings opportunity for individuals should remain sufficient to retain high quality executives and to align their performance to the 
interests of shareholders. As part of this, the Committee has looked again at the maximum achievable annual bonus. Up to 2009, this had been set 
at 120% of salary, with 150% achievable in exceptional circumstances (effectively the maximum limit). In 2009, as the housebuilding sector 
encountered extremely difficult trading conditions, the maximum was reduced to 100%. The management have successfully steered the Company 
through this difficult period and trading conditions have become more stable. Since then a number of other peer housebuilders have raised their 
bonus potential to well in excess of the Bellway level. Following consultation with major shareholders, the Committee intends to return the Bellway 
maximum to 120%, but without the previous provision for 150% in exceptional circumstances. The Committee will ensure that performance targets 
to achieve the maximum will be challenging.

The 2011/12 bonus will be based on profit (90%) and personal performance targets (30%) with the latter being assessed by reference to land bank 
management, health and safety and customer care. The Committee considers that outperformance of targets in relation to annual profitability and 
non-financial metrics provide a good link to the long-term performance of the business.

Long-term Incentive Plans
The Company operates two LTIPs which are designed to focus executive directors on longer term value creation, provide a strong retentive element 
and alignment of interest with shareholders.

The PSP was introduced for the Company’s executive directors and the Group Company Secretary. Under the PSP, executives have been granted 
awards over shares worth 100% of basic salary each year, subject to the achievement of TSR-based performance conditions or, in respect of the 
award granted in January 2008, a combination of TSR and Return on Capital Employed (“ROCE”) conditions. Awards will vest to executives after 
three years, subject to the achievement of performance conditions based around TSR. TSR measures the total return (share price growth and 
dividend) on a notional investment in Bellway shares, compared to the return on the same notional investment in shares of the other UK 
housebuilders. Management is rewarded for Bellway’s total return outperforming the other UK housebuilders. 

During 2010/11 the Committee reviewed the performance conditions in respect of the vesting of future long-term incentive awards. For recent 
awards under the PSP, the TSR performance condition has been based on TSR relative to an index of the larger quoted UK housebuilders. 
The rationale has been that this represents the peer group most directly comparable with the Company. However, it presents two issues. 
Firstly, there are now only six large comparator housebuilders, which means that relative TSR can be volatile, driven by erratic performance by other 
companies in the sector. Secondly, in principle, Bellway has to compete for capital with investment opportunities beyond the housebuilding sector. 

The Committee, after consultation with shareholders, has decided that for awards to be made in 2011/12, the TSR performance condition will be 
in two parts. Half will be measured by reference to the housebuilders’ index as before, and the other half will be measured by reference to the 
FTSE 250 Index (excluding investment trusts and financial services). This change should not make the achievement of the vesting conditions easier, 
or indeed harder, over the long term, but it should make it less erratic. As there are a higher number of comparator companies in the FTSE 250 
comparator group, performance of each company in the group will be assessed and ranked. Awards will start to vest at 25% if Bellway’s TSR matches 
the median of the companies in the group, increasing on a straight-line basis so that full vesting would be achieved if Bellway’s TSR reaches the upper 
quartile. Grant levels will remain unchanged at 100% of basic salary.

The Committee has also consulted shareholders on the possibility of incorporating additional performance conditions into the PSP for future years 
and this will be considered further as and when appropriate.

TSR is recognised as enabling alignment with the interests of institutional shareholders by providing a reward mechanism for delivering superior stock 
market performance. TSR calculations are independently calculated for the Committee by the Company’s brokers.

Further, regardless of TSR performance, for the award to be granted in the 2011/12 financial year, no part of the TSR element of an award will vest 
unless the Committee is satisfied that there has been an improvement in underlying financial performance over the performance period, taking into 
account, inter alia, operating profit, operating margin, ROCE and Net Asset Value (“NAV”). The Committee will scale back the level of vesting 
indicated by the TSR performance condition (potentially to zero) in circumstances where there has not been an improvement. 

The SMP operates in conjunction with the annual bonus. Under the SMP senior executives may invest up to 25% of their net cash bonus, on a 
voluntary basis, in Bellway shares, which must be held for a minimum of three years in the Trust. Invested shares will not be subject to a risk of 
forfeiture and executives will enjoy full beneficial ownership (including voting rights and dividends).

In return for investing in shares under the SMP, an award of matching shares is granted. The level of matching is on a gross basis to the net of tax 
bonus invested in shares.

Matching shares will vest subject to the executive remaining employed, retention of the invested shares and also subject to performance conditions.

No awards have been made to date. For any awards which may be made, the performance conditions will be the same as will apply to the award 
under the PSP in the same period. 

In addition to the two executive plans detailed above, the 2003 SRSOS is available to all employees, including the executive directors.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

39

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Shareholding Guidelines
There is a policy for a minimum shareholding requirement for the executive directors, equivalent to 100% of basic salary. As at 31 July 2011, and at 
the date of this report, Mr Watson and Mr Leitch held shares with an equivalent value well in excess of 100% of their basic salary. In response to the 
appointment of Mr Ayres to the Board on 1 August 2011 the Committee has established the following mechanism to ensure that new executive 
directors acquire the requisite shareholding. Within a period of three months of appointment an executive director must acquire a minimum of 
1,000 ordinary shares in the Company and must retain at least 50% of any shares awarded under the PSP or SMP, after allowance for paying tax, 
until the requisite number of shares has been accumulated. If personal circumstances make this difficult, the Committee would exercise discretion. 

Directors’ Interests
The directors’ interests (including family interests and holdings in which the directors are interested only as trustees) in the ordinary share capital  
of the Company are set out below:

Beneficial interests

H C Dawe

J K Watson

P J Stoker (retired 31 July 2011)

A M Leitch

P M Johnson

M R Toms

J A Cuthbert 

Fully paid ordinary 12.5 pence shares

31 July 2011

143,634

400,527

540,000

132,473

4,300

1,500

6,000

1 August 2010 or date 
of appointment if later

143,634

400,527

540,000

132,473

4,300

1,500

6,000

The directors’ interests (including family interests) in the preference share capital of the Company are set out below:

Beneficial interests 

H C Dawe

P J Stoker (retired 31 July 2011)

A M Leitch

Fully paid cumulative redeemable £1 preference shares

31 July 2011

1 August 2010 

709,164

300,000

150,000

679,164

150,000

150,000

There has been no change in any of the above interests between 31 July 2011 and the date of this report, apart from Mr Ayres, who joined the 
Board on 1 August 2011, who holds 3,073 ordinary shares in the Company, and Mr Stoker who retired from the Board on 31 July 2011 and whose 
interests at the date of this report are no longer disclosable.

Pensions
In July 2008 Mr Watson, Mr Stoker and Mr Leitch took enhanced transfer values from the final salary section of the Bellway p.l.c. 1972 Pension 
Scheme, and therefore have no accrued pension entitlements. Since 1 June 2008 they have received a cash payment in lieu of pension contributions 
amounting to 30% of basic salary. Following advice to the Committee, this amount was agreed as being reasonable in the circumstances and was less 
than the annual accrual foregone by the executive directors under the previous final salary arrangements. 

Mr Ayres is a member of the Company’s Group Self Invested Personal Pension Plan (“GSIPP”) and from 1 August 2011 the Company makes a 
contribution of 16% of his basic salary to the GSIPP on his behalf.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

40

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Governance
Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration (continued)

The auditors are required to report on the information contained in the following part of this report.

Non-executive Chairman

H C Dawe

Executive directors

J K Watson

P J Stoker(4)

A M Leitch

Non-executive directors

P M Johnson

M R Toms 

J A Cuthbert 

D G Perry

(5)

Totals

Notes:

Salary  
and fees  

Taxable
benefits(1)

Annual
bonus(2) 

£

£

233,750

3,201

£

–

Payment  
in lieu of
pension(3) 

£

–

Total

2011  
£

2010  
£

236,951

230,633

527,850

343,100

343,100

55,000

50,000

50,000

–

25,477

27,467

25,281

–

–

–

–

527,850

158,355

1,239,532

1,091,148

343,100

102,930

816,597

343,100

102,930

814,411

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

55,000

50,000

50,000

–

717,490

717,397

51,500

47,380

35,535

21,746

1,602,800

81,426

1,214,050

364,215

3,262,491

2,912,829

1.   Taxable benefits relate to the provision of motor vehicles, telephones and private medical insurance.

2.    The annual bonus is payable in November 2011 for performance during the year ended 31 July 2011. The performance conditions for the 2010/11 bonus were operating profit 

(pre-exceptional items) (80%) and non-financial performance (20%), with non-financial performance being assessed by reference to board structure and succession planning, land bank 
management, health and safety and customer care. The actual bonus payments against each of these metrics were determined on the following basis:

 

 

 operating profit was £75.21 million, with no exceptional items, an increase of 46.7% over the previous year. This was substantially above City expectations of underlying profitability and 
at the top end of the target range. The maximum bonus of 80% of salary was therefore achieved.

 in respect of the non-financial elements, the Committee took account of performance against each metric. In 2009/10 the non-financial metrics had not paid out in full, but in 2010/11 
the Company had achieved a significant improvement in its customer care score from 86% to 91%, and reduced its rate of over three-day lost time accidents per 100,000 employees to 
767.90 from 945.18 and had achieved its land bank target for the following financial year. It also completed the successful succession plans for the replacement of Mr Stoker and Mr Leitch. 
This performance triggered a full payout of the non-financial metrics.

3.   Taxable cash payment in lieu of pension contribution amounting to 30% of basic salary.

4.   Mr Stoker did not receive any payment for loss of office on his retirement from the Board.

5.   Retired 15 January 2010.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
 
 
41

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Directors’ Interests in the PSP
The executive directors have a potential future beneficial interest in certain shares held in the Trust pursuant to the allocation of shares under the 
PSP. Further information on the PSP is set out on page 38. The number of shares allocated in the Trust in respect of each director, along with the 
market price of the shares at the date of award, is shown below:

Potential future beneficial interests

Fully paid ordinary 12.5 pence shares

J K Watson

Totals

P J Stoker 

Totals

A M Leitch

Totals

Awards held at 
1 August  
2010

Awarded  
during  
the year 

Awards 
lapsed during 
the year

Awards vested 
during the
year(5)

Awards  
held at  
31 July 2011

Award date

16.01.2008(1)

04.11.2008(2)

29.10.2009(3)

21.10.2010(4)

67,159

89,487

72,028

–

228,674

16.01.2008(1)

43,653

04.11.2008(2)

58,167(9)

29.10.2009(3)

46,818(9)

–

–

–

96,060

96,060

–

–

–

34,721

32,438

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

89,487

72,028

96,060

34,721

32,438

257,575

22,569

21,084

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

58,167

46,818

62,439

21.10.2010(4)

–

62,439(9)

148,638

62,439

22,569

21,084

167,424

16.01.2008(1)

04.11.2008(2)

29.10.2009(3)

21.10.2010(4)

43,653

58,167

46,818

–

148,638

–

–

–

62,439

62,439

22,569

21,084

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

58,167

46,818

62,439

22,569

21,084

164,424

Notes:
1.  Market value on award 744.50p (16.01.2008), performance period 1 August 2007 – 31 July 2010.
2.  Market value on award 575.50p (04.11.2008), performance period 1 August 2008 – 31 July 2011.
3.  Market value on award 715.00p (29.10.2009), performance period 1 August 2009 – 31 July 2012.
4.  Market value on award 549.50p (21.10.2010), performance period 1 August 2010 – 31 July 2013.
5. 

 Market value on 18 January 2011, which was the day the shares in respect of Mr Watson and Mr Stoker vested, was 679.50p. Market value on 30 March 2011, which was the day the shares in 
respect of Mr Leitch vested, was 700.00p. The awards vested at 48.3% of the full entitlement. Aggregate gross gains made by the above directors on vesting of these awards under the PSP 
in the year were £511,267 (2010 – £610,420). 

6.  The performance conditions for each award are summarised below:

(a)  For awards made on 16 January 2008, two performance conditions applied to separate parts of the award:

(i)   50% of the award was based on a TSR condition comparing Bellway’s TSR against an index of the TSR of other housebuilders (“the Housebuilders Index”). Bellway’s TSR was 
compared to that of the Housebuilders Index. If Bellway’s TSR matched that of the Housebuilders Index, 25% of the TSR part of the award vested (reduced from the previous 
vesting profile whereby 33% of the award vested at median). Full vesting would be achieved for 7.5% per annum outperformance of the Housebuilders Index. The companies 
comprising the Housebuilders Index are Barratt Developments PLC, The Berkeley Group plc, Bovis Homes Group PLC, Persimmon plc, Redrow plc and Taylor Wimpey plc. 
This TSR condition was achieved at 96.6% of the maximum.

(ii)   The remaining 50% of the award was based on a range of ROCE based targets requiring average annual ROCE of 15% per annum (at which point, 25% of the ROCE part of the 
award would have vested) to 22% per annum for all of this part of the award to have vested. Awards would have vested on a straight-line basis in between these two points. 
This performance condition was not achieved. 

(b)   For the awards made on 4 November 2008, 29 October 2009 and 21 October 2010 the TSR part of the award applied as the sole performance condition (compared to the same 

companies as for the award made on 16 January 2008).

(c)   For the awards made on 4 November 2008 and 29 October 2009, regardless of TSR performance, no part of the TSR element of an award will vest unless the Committee is satisfied 
that the Company’s TSR over the performance period is reflective of underlying financial performance. For the 21 October 2010 award and for future awards, no part of the TSR 
element of an award will vest unless the Committee is satisfied that there has been an improvement in underlying financial performance, taking into account, inter alia, operating profit, 
operating margin, ROCE and NAV.

7.   The market price of the ordinary shares at 31 July 2011 was 660.00p and the range during the year was 510.50p to 753.00p.
8.  There has been no change in the above potential future beneficial interests between 31 July 2011 and the date of this report.
9.    Following Mr Stoker’s retirement from the Board on 31 July 2011, the full three year holding period of each of these awards is to apply up until the normal vesting dates. In respect of the 
awards granted on 4 November 2008 and 29 October 2009, Mr Stoker may exercise the full allocation of shares awarded subject to, and calculated by reference to, the relevant 
performance conditions and subject to the relevant financial underpin. In respect of the award granted on 21 October 2010, Mr Stoker may exercise up to 50% of the allocation of shares 
awarded subject to, and calculated by reference to, the relevant performance conditions and subject to the relevant financial underpin. 

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
42

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Governance
Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration (continued)

Directors’ Share Options
Details of all directors’ interests under the 2003 SRSOS are shown below:

J K Watson

Totals

P J Stoker

Totals

Notes:

Scheme

1 August 2010

Granted during 
the year

Exercised 
during the year

31 July 2011

Exercise price 
(p)

Exercisable 
from

Expiry date

2003 SRSOS

2003 SRSOS

2,857

2,857

2,857

2,857

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

2,857

2,857

2,857

2,857

336.00 1 Feb 2012 31 July 2012

336.00 1 Feb 2012 31 July 2012

1.  All of the above options were granted for nil consideration.

2  The market price of the ordinary shares at 31 July 2011 was 660.00p and the range during the year was 510.50p to 753.00p.

3.    (i)   Mr Stoker’s options lapsed on 1 August 2011, following his retirement from the Board on 31 July 2011. 

(ii)   Mr Ayres, who was appointed to the Board on 1 August 2011, had the following interests in the Company’s shares on appointment and as at the date of this report: 

(b) option over 10,000 shares granted on 17 November 2004 and an option over 16,500 shares granted on 31 October 2005; 
(c) option over 3,500 shares granted on 31 October 2005; 
(e) an option over 2,350 shares granted on 11 November 2009, exercisable from 1 February 2013. 
References to (b), (c) and (e) correspond with the summary of outstanding share options in note 19 on page 68. 

(iii)  There have been no other changes in the above holdings between 31 July 2011 and the date of this report.

Performance Graph
The graph below shows the TSR performance over the past five years of the Company, the FTSE 250 Index and the bespoke Housebuilders Index 
(as defined in note 6(a)(i) on page 41). The FTSE 250 Index has been selected as the most appropriate “broad equity market index” as the Company 
has been a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index over this period, and the bespoke Housebuilders Index has been selected as this index is used for the 
Company’s long-term incentive plans.

TSR over the last five financial years
Source: Datastream

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Bellway

House Builder Index

FTSE 250 Index

This graph looks at the value at 31 July 2011, of £100 invested in Bellway p.l.c. on 31 July 2006 compared with the value of £100 invested in the FTSE 
250 Index and in the bespoke Housebuilders Index over the same period.

This report will be put to an advisory vote of the Company’s shareholders at the AGM on 13 January 2012.

On behalf of the Board

Mike R Toms

Chairman of the Board Committee on Executive Directors’ Remuneration 
17 October 2011

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
 
 
43

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Governance
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities in respect of the 
Annual Report and Accounts

The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and Accounts and the Group and parent company financial statements in accordance 
with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the directors to prepare group and parent company financial statements for each financial year. Under that law they are 
required to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU and applicable law and have elected to prepare 
the parent company financial statements on the same basis.

Under company law the directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state  
of affairs of the Group and parent company and of their profit or loss for that period. In preparing each of the Group and parent company financial 
statements, the directors are required to:

  select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

  make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

  state whether they have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU; and

  prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Group and the parent company will 

continue in business.

The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the parent company’s transactions and 
disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the parent company and enable them to ensure that its financial statements 
comply with the Companies Act 2006. They have general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets 
of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.

Under applicable law and regulations, the directors are also responsible for preparing a Directors’ Report, Directors’ Remuneration Report and 
Corporate Governance Statement that complies with that law and those regulations.

The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company’s website. 
Legislation in the UK governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Responsibility statement of the directors in respect of the Annual Report and Accounts
We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:

  the financial statements, prepared in accordance with the applicable set of accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, 

financial position and profit or loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole; and

  the Directors’ Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the issuer and the 

undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face.

Alistair M Leitch

Finance Director 
17 October 2011

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
44

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Governance
Governance
Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members of Bellway p.l.c.

We have audited the financial statements of Bellway p.l.c. for the year ended 31 July 2011 set out on pages 45 to 76.

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards 
(“IFRSs”) as adopted by the EU and, as regards the parent company financial statements, as applied in accordance with the provisions of the 
Companies Act 2006.

This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit 
work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report 
and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and 
the Company’s members, as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors
As explained more fully in the Directors’ Responsibilities Statement set out on page 43, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the 
financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit, and express an opinion on, the financial 
statements in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with 
the Auditing Practices Board’s (“APB’s”) Ethical Standards for Auditors.

Scope of the audit of the financial statements
A description of the scope of an audit of financial statements is provided on the APB’s website at www.frc.org.uk/apb/scope/private.cfm. 

Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion:

 ƒ the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the parent company’s affairs as at 31 July 2011 and of the 

Group’s profit for the year then ended;

 ƒ the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU; 

 ƒ the parent company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU and as applied in 

accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006; and

 ƒ the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Group financial 

statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.

Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion:

 ƒ the part of the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 

2006; and

 ƒ the information given in the Directors’ Report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the 

financial statements.

Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following:

Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

 ƒ adequate accounting records have not been kept by the parent company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches 

not visited by us; or

 ƒ the parent company financial statements and the part of the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration to be audited are not in agreement 

with the accounting records and returns; or

 ƒ certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or

 ƒ we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.

Under the Listing Rules we are required to review:

 ƒ the directors’ statement, set out on page 33, in relation to going concern;

 ƒ the part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Company’s compliance with the nine provisions of the UK Corporate 

Governance Code specified for our review; and

 ƒ certain elements of the report to shareholders by the Board on directors’ remuneration. 

M R Thompson (Senior Statutory Auditor)

for and on behalf of KPMG Audit Plc, Statutory Auditor

Chartered Accountants 
Quayside House, 110 Quayside, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 3DX

17 October 2011 

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

14661_Bellway_AR11_p28-44.indd   44

11/11/2011   18:58

45

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Notes

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

1

5

4

2

2

6

8

8

886,095

768,341

(766,717)

(678,547)

119,378

89,794

(44,168)

(38,539)

75,210

1,774

51,255

2,281

(9,822)

(9,103)

67,162

44,433

(17,018)

50,144

(8,620)

35,813

41.5p

41.4p

29.7p

29.6p

Accounts
Group Income Statement
for the year ended 31 July 2011

Revenue

Cost of sales

Gross profit

Administrative expenses

Operating profit

Finance income

Finance expenses

Profit before taxation 

Income tax expense

Profit for the year *

* All attributable to equity holders of the parent.

There were no exceptional items in the current period (note 5).

Earnings per ordinary share – Basic

Earnings per ordinary share – Diluted

Statements of Comprehensive Income
for the year ended 31 July 2011

Profit/(loss) for the period

Other comprehensive income

Actuarial gains on defined benefit pension plans

Income tax on other comprehensive income

Other comprehensive income for the period,  
net of income tax

Group  
2011 
£000

Group 
2010 
£000

Company  
2011  
£000

Company 
2010  
£000

Notes

50,144

35,813

(1,905)

(1,913)

25

6

761

(587)

1,891

(582)

174

1,309

–

–

–

–

–

–

Total comprehensive income/(expense) for the period *

50,318

37,122

(1,905)

(1,913)

* All attributable to equity holders of the parent.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
46

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Statement of Changes in Equity
at 31 July 2011

Issued  
capital 

Share  
premium 

Other  
reserves 

Retained 
earnings  

Total  

Group

Balance at 1 August 2009

Notes

£000

£000

14,375

117,198

£000

1,492

£000

£000

Non-
controlling 
interest  
£000

Total  
equity  

£000

832,013

965,078

(66)

965,012

Total comprehensive income 
for the period

Profit for the period

Other comprehensive income *

Total comprehensive income for the period

Transactions with shareholders 
recorded directly in equity:

Dividends on equity shares

Shares issued

Credit in relation to share options 
and tax thereon

Purchase of own shares

Total contributions by and distributions 
to shareholders

–

–

–

–

728

–

–

–

–

–

–

43,365

–

–

728

43,365

7

19

25

20

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

35,813

1,309

37,122

35,813

1,309

37,122

(11,221)

(11,221)

–

44,093

1,569

1,569

(1,777)

(1,777)

(11,429)

32,664

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

35,813

1,309

37,122

(11,221)

44,093

1,569

(1,777)

32,664

Balance at 31 July 2010

15,103

160,563

1,492

857,706

1,034,864

(66) 1,034,798

Total comprehensive income 
for the period

Profit for the period

Other comprehensive income *

Total comprehensive income for the period

Transactions with shareholders 
recorded directly in equity:

Dividends on equity shares

Shares issued

Credit in relation to share options 
and tax thereon

Purchase of own shares

Total contributions by and distributions 
to shareholders

–

–

–

–

2

–

–

2

–

–

–

–

79

–

–

79

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

50,144

50,144

174

174

50,318

50,318

(12,543)

(12,543)

–

81

1,213

(559)

1,213

(559)

(11,889)

(11,808)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

50,144

174

50,318

(12,543)

81

1,213

(559)

(11,808)

7

19

25

20

Balance at 31 July 2011

15,105

160,642

1,492

896,135 1,073,374

(66) 1,073,308

* Additional breakdown is provided in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

  
  
  
 
 
 
 
47

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Company

Balance at 1 August 2009

Notes

£000

£000

14,375

117,198

£000

2,145

Issued  
capital  

Share  
premium  

Other  
reserves  

Share-based 
payment 
reserve  
£000

Retained 
earnings  

£000

Total  
equity  

£000

10,585

570,197

714,500

Total comprehensive expense 
for the period

Loss for the period

Other comprehensive income *

Total comprehensive expense for the period

Transactions with shareholders 
recorded directly in equity:

Dividends on equity shares

Shares issued

Credit in relation to share options

Purchase of own shares

Total contributions by and distributions 
to shareholders

–

–

–

–

728

–

–

–

–

–

–

43,365

–

–

728

43,365

7

19

25

20

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

1,372

(1,913)

(1,913)

–

–

(1,913)

(1,913)

(11,221)

(11,221)

–

–

44,093

1,372

–

(7,486)

(7,486)

1,372

(18,707)

26,758

Balance at 31 July 2010

15,103

160,563

2,145

11,957

549,577

739,345

Total comprehensive expense 
for the period

Loss for the period

Other comprehensive income *

Total comprehensive expense for the period

Transactions with shareholders 
recorded directly in equity:

Dividends on equity shares

Shares issued

Credit in relation to share options

Purchase of own shares

Total contributions by and distributions 
to shareholders

–

–

–

–

2

–

–

2

–

–

–

–

79

–

–

79

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

957

–

(1,905)

(1,905)

–

–

(1,905)

(1,905)

(12,543)

(12,543)

–

–

(559)

81

957

(559)

957

(13,102)

(12,064)

7

19

25

20

Balance at 31 July 2011

15,105

160,642

2,145

12,914

534,570

725,376

* Additional breakdown is provided in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
 
 
 
48

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Balance Sheets 
at 31 July 2011

ASSETS

Non-current assets

Property, plant and equipment

Investment property

Investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities

Other financial assets

Deferred tax assets

Current assets

Inventories

Trade and other receivables

Cash and cash equivalents

Total assets

LIABILITIES

Non-current liabilities

Interest bearing loans and borrowings

Retirement benefit obligations

Trade and other payables

Deferred tax liabilities

Current liabilities

Interest bearing loans and borrowings

Corporation tax payable

Trade and other payables

Total liabilities

Net assets

EQUITY

Issued capital

Share premium

Other reserves

Share-based payment reserve

Retained earnings

Total equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

Non-controlling interest

Total equity

Group  
2011 
£000

Group  
2010 
£000

Company  
2011 
£000

Company  
2010 
£000

Notes

9

10

11

14

12

9,023

8,880

–

33,491

3,683

55,077

8,216

7,716

–

–

–

–

 – 

29,117

28,160

32,664

3,694

52,290

–

–

–

–

29,117

28,160

13 1,270,292

1,148,713

–

15

22

62,176

83,412

45,801

668,392

145,689

48,741

1,415,880

1,340,203

717,133

1,470,957

1,392,493

746,250

–

683,173

48,856

732,029

760,189

16

25

17

12

16

85,000

100,000

20,000

20,000

8,401

31,218

66

8,736

20,299

 166 

–

–

–

–

–

–

124,685

129,201

20,000

20,000

15,000

11,836

17

246,128

272,964

397,649

 – 

 2,842 

225,652

228,494

357,695

–

–

874

874

20,874

1,073,308

1,034,798

725,376

 – 

 – 

844

844

20,844

739,345

19

15,105

15,103

15,105

15,103

160,642

160,563

160,642

160,563

1,492

–

1,492

–

2,145

12,914

896,135

857,706

534,570

1,073,374

1,034,864

725,376

(66)

(66)

–

2,145

11,957

549,577

739,345

–

1,073,308

1,034,798

725,376

739,345

Approved by the Board of Directors on 17 October 2011 and signed on its behalf by  

Registered number 1372603

Howard C Dawe   
Director    

Alistair M Leitch
Director

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
Accounts
Cash Flow Statements
for the year ended 31 July 2011

Cash flows from operating activities

Profit/(loss) for the year

Depreciation charge

Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment

Profit on sale of investment properties

Finance income

Finance expenses

Share-based payment charge

Income tax expense

(Increase)/decrease in inventories

(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables

Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables

Cash from operations

Interest paid

Income tax (paid)/received

49

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Notes

9, 10

4

2

2

25

6

Group  
2011 
£000

Group  
2010 
£000

Company  
2011 
£000

Company  
2010 
£000

50,144

1,695

(262)

(27)

35,813

1,659

(184)

(39)

(1,774)

(2,281)

9,822

957

17,018

9,103

1,372

8,620

(121,579)

62,638

(1,905)

(1,913)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

1,900

1,899

–

–

–

–

–

–

(19,175)

(15,869)

14,781

14,740

29,879

(33,602)

30

(14)

(33,302)

67,230

14,806

14,712

(5,553)

(2,534)

(1,903)

(1,895)

(8,444)

7,484

–

–

Net cash (outflow)/inflow from operating activities

(47,299)

72,180

12,903

12,817

Cash flows from investing activities

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment

Acquisition of investment properties

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

Proceeds from sale of investment properties

Interest received

Net cash outflow from investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds from issue of share capital on share placing

Proceeds from the issue of share capital on exercise of share options 

Purchase of own shares by employee share option plans

Dividends paid

Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities

(2,588)

(1,230)

351

185

1,322

(1,960)

(1,763)

(657)

322

262

1,049

(787)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

19

–

81

43,658

435

–

81

43,658

435

(559)

(1,777)

(559)

(1,777)

(12,540)

(11,230)

(12,540)

(11,230)

(13,018)

31,086

(13,018)

31,086

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

(62,277)

102,479

(115)

43,903

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

145,689

43,210

48,856

4,953

22

83,412

145,689

48,741

48,856

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

50

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Accounting Policies

Basis of preparation
Bellway p.l.c. (the “Company”) is a company incorporated in the UK. 

Both the Company financial statements and the Group financial statements have been prepared and approved by the directors in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU (“Adopted IFRSs”) and have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for 
other financial assets, which are stated at their fair value. On publishing the Company financial statements here together with the Group financial 
statements, which were approved for issue on 17 October 2011, the Company is taking advantage of the exemption in section 408 of the Companies 
Act 2006 not to present its individual income statement and related notes that form a part of these financial statements.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Adopted IFRSs requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions 
that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions 
are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form 
the basis of making the judgements about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may 
differ from these estimates.

The Group’s business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position are set out in the Chief 
Executive’s Operating Review on pages 6 to 11. The financial position of the Group, its cash flows, liquidity position and borrowing facilities are 
described in the Group Finance Director’s Review on pages 20 to 23. Note 18 to the financial statements sets out the Group’s policies and processes 
for managing its capital, financial risk, and its exposures to credit risk and liquidity risk.

The Group’s activities are financed principally by a combination of ordinary shares, preference shares, bank borrowings and cash in hand. At 31 July 
2011, cash net of borrowings (excluding preference shares) was £3.4 million having expended £62.3 million during the year. The Group has operated 
within all of its banking covenants throughout the year. In addition, the Group had bank facilities of £290.0 million, expiring in tranches up to 
December 2015, with £210.0 million available for drawdown under such facilities at 31 July 2011.

The directors consider that the Group is well placed to manage business and financial risks in the current economic environment and have a 
reasonable expectation that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. Accordingly they 
continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the Annual Report and Accounts.

Judgements made by the directors, in the application of these accounting policies and Adopted IFRSs, that have a significant effect on the 
financial statements and estimates with a significant risk of material adjustment in the next year, are discussed below.

The accounting policies set out below have, unless otherwise stated, been applied consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated financial 
statements.

Effect of new standards and interpretations effective for the first time
The Group has adopted Annual Improvements 2009 in the Group’s financial statements for the year ended 31 July 2011. The adoption of Annual 
Improvements 2009 has not had a material effect on the Group’s profit for the period or equity.

The other standards and interpretations that are applicable for the first time in the Group’s financial statements for the year ended 31 July 2011 have 
no effect on these financial statements.

Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and entities controlled by the Company (its subsidiaries) 
made up to 31 July. Control exists when the Group has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so 
as to obtain benefits from its activities. In assessing control, potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are taken into account. 
The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date 
that control ceases.

Jointly controlled entities are those entities over whose activities the Group has joint control, established by contractual agreement. The consolidated 
financial statements include the Group’s proportionate share of the significant entities’ assets, liabilities, income and expenses with items of a similar 
nature on a line by line basis, from the date that joint control commences until the date that joint control ceases.

Property, plant and equipment
Items are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Depreciation on property, plant and equipment is charged to the 
income statement on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives over the following number of years:

Plant, fixtures and fittings – 3 to 10 years. 
Freehold buildings – 40 years.

Freehold land is not depreciated.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

51

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Investment property
Investment property is initially recognised at cost. Subsequent to recognition, investment property is measured using the cost model and is carried 
at cost less any accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. 

Depreciation is charged, where material, so as to write off the cost less residual value of the investment properties over their estimated useful lives. 
The residual values and useful lives of investment properties are reviewed at each financial year end. 

The useful life of investment properties has been assessed as: 10 – 100 years (2010 – 100 years).

Land is not depreciated.

Investments in subsidiaries
Interests in subsidiary undertakings are valued at cost less impairment.

Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost, in relation to work in progress and showhomes, comprises direct materials 
and, where applicable, direct labour costs and those overheads, not including any general administrative overheads, that have been incurred in 
bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Net realisable value represents the estimated selling price less all estimated costs 
of completion and overheads.

Land held for development, including land in the course of development until legal completion of the sale of the asset, is initially recorded at cost. 
Regular reviews are carried out to identify any impairment in the value of the land by comparing the total estimated selling prices less estimated 
selling expenses against the book cost of the land plus estimated costs to complete. Provision is made for any irrecoverable amounts. Where, through 
deferred payment terms, the fair value of land purchased differs from the amount that will subsequently be paid in settling the liability, the difference is 
charged as a finance expense in the income statement over the period to settlement.

Options purchased in respect of land are capitalised initially at cost. Regular reviews are carried out for impairment in the value of these options, and 
provisions made accordingly to reflect loss of value. The impairment reviews consider the period elapsed since the date of purchase of the option 
given that the option contract has not been exercised at the review date. Further, the impairment reviews consider the remaining life of the option, 
taking account of any concerns over whether the remaining time available will allow a successful exercise of the option. The carrying cost of the 
option at the date of exercise is included within the cost of land purchased as a result of the option exercise.

Investments in land without the benefit of planning consent, either through the purchase of land or non-refundable deposits paid on land purchase 
contracts subject to planning consent, are included initially at cost. Regular reviews are carried out for impairment in the values of these investments 
and provision made to reflect any irrecoverable element. The impairment reviews consider the existing use value of the land and assess the likelihood 
of achieving planning consent and the value thereof.

Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables are stated at their fair value at the date of initial recognition and subsequently at amortised cost less allowances for impairment.

Other financial assets
Other financial assets are classified as being available-for-sale and are stated at fair value, with any resultant gain or loss being recognised directly 
in equity within retained earnings, except for impairment losses and changes in future cash flows, which are recognised directly in the income 
statement. When these investments are de-recognised, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised directly in equity is recognised in the 
income statement. Where these investments are interest-bearing, interest calculated using the effective interest method is recognised in the 
income statement.

A description of the valuation technique is given in note 14 on page 63.

Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash balances in hand and in the bank (including short-term cash deposits). The Group utilises bank 
overdraft facilities, which are repayable on demand, as part of its cash management policy. As a consequence, bank overdrafts are included as a 
component of net cash and cash equivalents within the cash flow statement. Offset arrangements across Group businesses are applied to arrive 
at the cash and overdraft figures in the balance sheet. 

Interest bearing loans and borrowings
Interest bearing loans and borrowings are stated at their fair value at the date of initial recognition and subsequently at amortised cost.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

52

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Accounting Policies (continued)

Trade and other payables
Trade payables on normal terms are not interest bearing and are stated at their nominal value. Trade payables on deferred terms, most notably 
in relation to land purchases, are recorded initially at their fair value. The discount to nominal value is amortised over the period to settlement 
and charged to finance expenses. 

Share capital 
I. Preference share capital 
Preference share capital is redeemable on 6 April 2014 or at the option of the Company (subject to relevant conditions set out in note 16) and is 
classified as a liability. 

II. Dividends 
Dividends on redeemable preference shares are recognised as a liability and accrued using the effective interest rate method. They are recognised 
in the income statement within finance expenses.

Other dividends are recognised as a liability in the period in which they are approved by the shareholders. Interim dividends are recognised 
when paid. 

Classification of equity instruments and financial liabilities issued by the Group
Equity instruments issued by the Group are treated as equity only to the extent that they meet the following two conditions: 

(a) they include no contractual obligations upon the Company (or Group as the case may be) to deliver cash or other financial assets or to exchange 
financial assets or financial liabilities with another party under conditions that are potentially unfavourable to the Company (or Group); and 

(b) where the instrument will or may be settled in the Company’s own equity instruments, it is either a non-derivative that includes no obligation to 
deliver a variable number of the Company’s own equity instruments or is a derivative that will be settled by the Company’s exchanging a fixed 
amount of cash or other financial assets for a fixed number of its own equity instruments.

To the extent that this definition is not met, the proceeds of issue are classified as a financial liability. Where the instrument so classified takes the 
legal form of the Company’s own shares, the amounts presented in these financial statements for called up share capital and share premium account 
exclude amounts in relation to those shares. 

Grants
Grants are included within work in progress in the balance sheet to the extent that they contribute to construction costs and within deferred 
income to the extent that they contribute to site income. Grants are credited to the income statement over the life of the developments to which 
they relate.

Revenue recognition
Revenue from private housing sales and land is recognised when transactions have legally completed. 

Incentives
Sales incentives are substantially cash in nature but include part-exchange costs which mainly relate to amounts written down, where the part-
exchange allowance given to the purchaser of the new home is greater than the valuation of the part-exchange property. Incentives are accounted 
for by reducing the housebuild revenue by the cost to the Group of providing the incentive. 

Sales incentives also include shared equity schemes which are accounted for as Other Financial Assets. Revenue is recognised at the initial fair value 
of the Other Financial Assets as described above.

Rental income
Rental income is recognised in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

Part-exchange properties
The purchase and subsequent sale of part-exchange properties is an activity undertaken in order to achieve the sale of a new property. As such, the 
activity is regarded as a mechanism for selling. Impairments and gains or losses on the sale of part-exchange properties are classified as a cost of sale.

Contingent liabilities
Where the Company enters into financial guarantee contracts to guarantee the indebtedness of other companies within the Group, the Company 
considers these to be insurance arrangements, and accounts for them as such. In this respect, the Company treats the guarantee contract as a 
contingent liability until such time as it becomes probable that the Company will be required to make a payment under the guarantee.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

53

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Taxation
The charge for taxation is based on the result for the year and takes into account current and deferred taxation. The charge is recognised in the 
income statement except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in equity in which case it is recognised in equity.

Deferred taxation is provided for all temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the 
corresponding tax bases. The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount 
of assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.

A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be 
utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax 
benefit will be realised. 

Employee benefits – retirement benefit costs
For the defined benefit scheme, the liability is calculated as the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date. The fair 
values of scheme assets are then deducted. The calculation is performed by a qualified actuary using the projected unit credit method. All actuarial 
gains and losses are recognised immediately in the Statement of Comprehensive Income (“SOCI”). Further details of the scheme and the valuation 
methods applied may be found in note 25 on pages 70 to 73.

Defined contribution pension costs are charged to the income statement in the period for which contributions are payable.

Employee benefits – share-based payment
In accordance with IFRS 2, the fair value of equity settled share options granted is recognised as an employee expense with a corresponding increase 
in equity. The fair value is measured as at the date the options are granted and the charge is only amended if vesting does not take place due to 
non-market conditions not being met. Various option pricing models are used according to the terms of the option scheme under which the options 
were granted. The fair value is spread over the period during which the employees become unconditionally entitled to the options. The amount 
recognised as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of options that vest. At the balance sheet date, if it is expected that non-market 
conditions will not be satisfied, the cumulative expense recognised in relation to the relevant options is reversed.

IFRS 2 has been applied to options granted after 7 November 2002 which had not vested at 1 January 2005.

With respect to share-based payments, a deferred tax asset is recognised on the relevant tax base. The tax base is then compared to the cumulative 
share-based payment expense recognised in the income statement. Deferred tax arising on the excess of the tax base over the cumulative share-
based payment expense recognised in the income statement has been recognised directly in equity outside the SOCI as share-based payments 
are considered to be transactions with shareholders.

A deferred tax asset relating to awards issued before 7 November 2002, which follow the exemption of IFRS 1 and have not been accounted 
for under IFRS 2, has been recognised on transition. Subsequent reversal of the deferred tax asset and any excess tax benefits are recognised 
directly in equity.

Where the Company grants options over its own shares to the employees of its subsidiaries it recognises, in its individual financial statements, 
an increase in the cost of investment in its subsidiaries equivalent to the equity settled share-based payment charge recognised in its consolidated 
financial statements, with the corresponding credit being recognised in equity. 

Own shares held by ESOP trust
Transactions of the Company-sponsored ESOP trust are included in both the Group financial statements and the Company’s own financial 
statements. The purchase of shares in the Company by the trust are charged directly to equity. 

Operating leases
Operating lease rentals are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.

Finance income and expenses
Finance income includes interest receivable on bank deposits. Other financial assets relate to the deferred element of revenues receivable from the 
sale of homes under shared equity schemes. The discounting of these other financial assets produces a notional interest receivable amount and this 
is credited to cost of sales. 

Finance expenses includes interest on bank borrowings and dividends on redeemable preference shares. The discounting of the deferred payments 
for land purchases produces a notional interest payable amount and this is also charged to finance expenses.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

54

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Accounting Policies (continued)

Exceptional items
Exceptional items are those which, in the opinion of the Board, are material by size or nature, non-recurring, and of such significance that they require 
separate disclosure on the face of the income statement.

Accounting estimates and judgements
Management considers the key estimates and judgements made in the financial statements to be related to: 

Valuation of work in progress and land held for development 
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realisable value, less payments on account. Net realisable value represents the estimated selling 
price (in the ordinary course of business) less all estimated costs of completion and overheads. Valuations of site work in progress are carried out at 
regular intervals and estimates of the cost to complete a site and estimates of anticipated revenues are required to enable a development profit to 
be determined. Management are required to employ considerable judgement in estimating the profitability of a site and in assessing any impairment 
provisions which may be required.

For both the years ended 31 July 2011 and 31 July 2010, a full review of inventories has been performed and write downs have been made where 
cost exceeds net realisable value. Estimated selling prices have been reviewed on a site by site basis and selling prices have been amended based on 
local management and the Board’s assessment of current market conditions. For the years ended 31 July 2011 and 31 July 2010 no exceptional charge 
has resulted from the review.

Whilst management remain cautious, selling prices and volumes have stabilised, however the market remains fragile. Should there be further 
significant movements in selling prices, either further reductions or a stepped recovery, exceptional charges or credits may be necessary.

Pension 
The Group has utilised a rate of return on assets and a discount rate having been advised by its actuary. To the extent that such assumed rates are 
different from what actually transpires, the pension liability of the Group would change.

Income taxes
A certain degree of estimation and judgement is required in establishing the tax figures prior to formal resolution with HMRC. In accordance with 
the contingent asset rules, detailed in IAS 37, the Group’s policy is to be prudent in assessing the level of benefit which may accrue.

Other financial assets
The fair value of future anticipated cash receipts takes into account the directors’ view of future house price movements, the expected timing of 
receipts and the likelihood that a purchaser defaults on a repayment. The directors revisit the future anticipated cash receipts from the assets at the 
end of each reporting period as detailed in note 14 on page 63.

Standards and interpretations in issue but not yet effective
At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, the following relevant amendment, which has not been applied in these financial 
statements, was in issue and endorsed by the EU but not yet effective:

	IFRS 7 “Financial Instruments: Disclosure” (Amendment). The amendment provides clarification of the standard and requires additional disclosures 

in relation to financial instruments. This is effective for the period beginning on 1 August 2011.

The Board anticipates that this amendment will be adopted in the Group’s financial statements in the year it becomes effective and that the adoption 
of this amendment will not have a significant effect on the Group’s financial statements.

Of the other IFRSs that are available for early adoption, none are expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

Accounts
Notes to the Accounts

55

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

1 Segmental analysis
The Board regularly reviews the Group’s performance and balance sheet position for its entire operations, which are based in the UK, and receives 
financial information for the UK as a whole. As a consequence the Group has one reportable segment which is UK housebuilding.

As there continues to be only one reportable segment whose revenue, profits, expenses, assets, liabilities and cash flows are measured and reported 
on a basis consistent with the Group financial statements, no additional numerical disclosures are necessary.

Additional information on average selling prices and the unit sales split between north, south, private and social has been included in the Group 
Finance Director’s Review on pages 20 to 23. The Board does not, however, consider these categories to be separate reportable segments as they 
review the entire operations as a whole, which are based in the UK, when assessing performance and making decisions about the allocation 
of resources. 

2 Finance income and expenses

Interest receivable on bank deposits

Other interest income

Finance income

Interest payable on bank loans and overdrafts

Interest on deferred term land payables

Interest element of movement in pension scheme deficit

Other interest expense

Preference dividends 

Finance expenses

3 Employee information
Group employment costs, including directors, comprised:

Wages and salaries

Social security

Pension costs (note 25)

Share-based payments (note 25)

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

1,381

393

1,774

4,154

3,062

426

280

1,900

9,822

1,306

975

2,281

2,154

4,456

413

181

1,899

9,103

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

61,906

51,463

6,231

1,919

957

5,240

1,720

1,372

71,013

59,795

The average number of persons employed by the Group during the year was 1,496 (2010 – 1,360) comprising 516 (2010 – 464) administrative and 
980 (2010 – 896) production and others employed in housebuilding and associated trading activities. 

The executive directors and the Group Company Secretary are the only employees of the Company and the emoluments of the executive directors 
are disclosed in the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration on pages 35 to 42.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
56

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Notes to the Accounts (continued)

3 Employee information (continued)
Key management personnel remuneration, including directors, comprised:

Salaries and fees

Taxable benefits

Annual bonus – cash

Pension costs

Share-based payments

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

2,756

171

1,951

77

378

2,533

167

1,318

46

901

5,333

4,965

Key management personnel, as disclosed under IAS 24: “Related party disclosures”, comprises the directors and other senior operational 
management.

4 Operating profit

Operating profit is stated after charging/(crediting):

Staff costs (note 3)

  Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment

  Depreciation of property, plant and equipment

  Depreciation of investment property

  Hire of plant and machinery

  Operating lease charges for land and buildings

Auditors’ remuneration:

  Audit of these financial statements

Amounts receivable by the auditors and their associates in respect of: 

  Audit of financial statements of subsidiaries pursuant to legislation

  Other services relating to taxation

  Pension scheme audits 

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

71,013

59,795

(262)

1,692

3

8,069

1,203

(184)

1,659

–

6,520

1,300

29

29

191

45

4

183

46

5

Amounts paid to the Company’s auditors and their associates in respect of services to the Company, other than the audit of the Company’s financial 
statements, have not been disclosed as the information is required instead to be disclosed on a consolidated basis.

5 Exceptional items 
Exceptional items are those which, in the opinion of the Board, are material by size or nature, non-recurring, and of such significance that they require 
separate disclosure on the face of the income statement.

A full review of inventories was performed at 31 July 2011 and the carrying value of land was compared to the net realisable value. Net realisable 
value represents the estimated selling price (in the ordinary course of business) less all estimated costs of completion and attributable overheads. 
Estimated selling prices were reviewed on a site-by-site basis and selling prices were amended based on local management and the Board’s 
assessment of current market conditions. No exceptional land write downs or land write backs were required as a result of this review.

There were no exceptional items in the year ended 31 July 2010.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
 
57

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

19,164

(1,726)

17,438

6,693

(1,488)

5,205

(285)

(135)

6,768

125

–

(3,478)

(420)

17,018

3,415

8,620

2011 
%

2011 
£000

2010 
%

2010 
£000

67,162

18,335

544

(135)

(1,726)

–

27.3

0.8

(0.2)

(2.6)

–

44,433

12,441

1,020

125

(1,488)

(3,478)

8,620

28.0

2.3

0.3

(3.4)

(7.8)

19.4

6 Income tax expense

Current tax expense:

UK corporation tax

Adjustments in respect of prior years

Deferred tax (credit)/expense:

Origination and reversal of temporary differences

Reduction in tax rate

Adjustments in respect of prior years

Total income tax expense in income statement

Reconciliation of effective tax rate:

Profit before tax

Tax calculated at UK corporation tax rate 

Non-deductible expenses

Reduction in tax rate

Adjustments in respect of prior years – current tax

– deferred tax

Effective tax rate and tax expense for the year 

25.3

17,018

The deferred tax assets and liabilities held by the Group at the start of the year that are expected to be realised after 31 March 2012 have been 
revalued at a tax rate of 25%, being the corporation tax rate that was substantively enacted at the balance sheet date, with effect from 1 April 2012. 
The Chancellor has also proposed changes to further reduce the main rate of corporation tax by one per cent per annum to 23% by 1 April 2014, 
but these changes were not substantively enacted at the balance sheet date and therefore are not included in the figures above.

The effective income tax charge is 25.3% of profit before tax (2010 – 19.4%) and compares favourably to the Group’s standard tax rate for the year 
of 27.3% (2010 – 28.0%). The lower effective tax rate in the current year is principally due to finalisation of prior year land remediation claims. 

Deferred tax recognised directly in equity:

  Credit relating to equity-settled transactions

  Charge relating to actuarial movement on the defined benefit pension scheme

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

256

(587)

197

(582)

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
58

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Notes to the Accounts (continued)

7 Dividends on equity shares

Amounts recognised as distributions to equity holders in the year:

Final dividend for the year ended 31 July 2010 of 6.7p per share (2009 – 6.0p)

Interim dividend for the year ended 31 July 2011 of 3.7p per share (2010 – 3.3p)

Dividends forfeited

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

8,096

4,471

(24)

7,238

3,987

(4)

12,543

11,221

Proposed final dividend for the year ended 31 July 2011 of 8.8p per share (2010 – 6.7p)

10,635

8,096

The 2011 proposed final dividend is subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting on 13 January 2012 and, in accordance with 
IAS 10, has not been included as a liability in these financial statements.

8 Earnings per ordinary share
Basic earnings per ordinary share is calculated by dividing earnings by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year 
(excluding the weighted average number of ordinary shares held by the employee share ownership plans which are treated as cancelled).

Diluted earnings per ordinary share uses the same earnings figure as the basic calculation except that the weighted average number of shares has 
been adjusted to reflect the dilutive effect of outstanding share options allocated under employee share schemes where the market value exceeds 
the option price. It is assumed that all dilutive potential ordinary shares are converted at the beginning of the accounting period. Diluted earnings per 
ordinary share is calculated by dividing earnings by the diluted weighted average number of ordinary shares.

Reconciliations of the earnings and weighted average number of shares used in the calculations are outlined below:

For basic earnings per ordinary share

Dilutive effect of options and awards

Earnings  

2011  
£000

Weighted 
average 
number of 
ordinary 
shares  
2011  
no.

50,144 120,705,397

462,722

For diluted earnings per ordinary share

50,144 121,168,119

Earnings  
per share  

Earnings  

Weighted 
average number 
of ordinary shares  

Earnings  
per share  

2011  
p

 41.5 

 (0.1)

41.4

2010  
£000

2010  
no.

35,813

120,619,800

549,620

35,813

121,169,420

2010  
p

29.7

 (0.1)

29.6

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9 Property, plant and equipment

Group

Cost 

At 1 August 2009

Additions

Disposals

At 1 August 2010

Additions

Disposals

At 31 July 2011

Depreciation

At 1 August 2009

Charge for year

On disposals

At 1 August 2010

Charge for year

On disposals

At 31 July 2011

Net book value

At 31 July 2011

At 31 July 2010

At 31 July 2009

59

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Land and  
property  

£000

Plant,  
fixtures and  
fittings  
£000

Total  

£000

6,152

101

(8)

6,245

–

(1)

15,189

1,662

(2,225)

14,626

2,588

(2,153)

21,341

1,763

(2,233)

20,871

2,588

(2,154)

6,244

15,061

21,305

957

140

–

1,097

140

–

12,134

1,519

(2,095)

11,558

1,552

(2,065)

13,091

1,659

(2,095)

12,655

1,692

(2,065)

1,237

11,045

12,282

5,007

5,148

5,195

4,016

3,068

3,055

9,023

8,216

8,250

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

  
 
 
60

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Notes to the Accounts (continued)

10 Investment property

Group

Cost 

At 1 August 2009

Additions

Disposals

At 1 August 2010

Additions

Disposals

At 31 July 2011

Depreciation

At 1 August 2009

Charge for year

At 1 August 2010

Charge for year

At 31 July 2011

Net book value

At 31 July 2011

At 31 July 2010

At 31 July 2009

Total  
£000

7,377

657

(318)

7,716

1,230

(63)

8,883

–

–

–

3

3

8,880

7,716

7,377

Investment properties, which primarily represent properties where Bellway has retained an interest in a sold property, are valued under the cost 
model and are held at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. A formal internal valuation of investment properties 
was carried out at the end of the financial year. The fair value of the investment properties was assessed at £9.608 million (2010 – £8.238 million).

The investment properties are primarily a proportion of the cost of residential units constructed by the Group, the units being sold under a shared 
ownership scheme. 

11 Investments in subsidiaries and proportionately consolidated jointly controlled entities 
The Group and Company have the following investments in subsidiaries and proportionately consolidated jointly controlled entities: 

Subsidiaries

Company

Cost 

At 1 August 2010

Additions

At 31 July 2011

Principal subsidiary undertakings
A summary of the principal subsidiary undertakings is given in note 27 on page 76.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

Shares in 
subsidiary 
undertakings 
£000

28,160

957

29,117

61

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

11 Investments in subsidiaries and proportionately consolidated jointly controlled entities (continued)
Jointly controlled entities

Name

Barking Riverside Limited

Country of incorporation

England and Wales

Percentage of shares owned  
directly by Bellway p.l.c.

51%

The Group and Company also own 25% – 50% of the ordinary share capital of several smaller proportionately consolidated jointly controlled 
entities. All of these entities are incorporated and registered in England and Wales. 

Aggregated amounts relating to share of proportionately consolidated jointly controlled entities not adjusted for transactions with  
Group companies

Non-current assets

Current assets

Non-current liabilities

Current liabilities

Net liabilities

Income

Expenses

2011  
£000

265

2010  
£000

293

36,123

30,682

(6,283)

(5,644)

(40,170)

(35,297)

(10,065)

(9,966)

5,140

(5,240)

1,090

(7,173)

Guarantees relating to the overdrafts of jointly controlled entities have been given by the Company (note 23).

12 Deferred taxation
The following are the deferred tax assets/(liabilities) recognised by the Group and the movements thereon during the current and prior year:

Group

At 1 August 2009

Income statement charge

Charge to statement of comprehensive income

Credit to equity

At 31 July 2010

Income statement (charge)/credit

Charge to statement of comprehensive income

Credit to equity

At 31 July 2011

Capital 
allowances 

£000

679

(156)

–

–

523

(108)

–

–

Retirement 
benefit 
obligations 
£000

3,339

(399)

(582)

–

2,358

329

(587)

–

Share-based 
payments 

£000

753

(137)

–

197

813

99

–

256

415

2,100

1,168

Losses 

£000

2,104

(2,104)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Other 
temporary 
differences 
£000

453

(619)

–

–

(166)

100

–

–

Total 

£000

7,328

(3,415)

(582)

197

3,528

420

(587)

256

(66)

3,617

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
62

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Notes to the Accounts (continued)

12 Deferred taxation (continued)
The following is an analysis of the deferred tax balances for financial reporting purposes:

Capital allowances

Retirement benefit obligations

Share-based payments

Deferred tax assets

Other temporary differences

Deferred tax liabilities

Net deferred tax asset at 31 July

There are no deferred tax balances in respect of the Company. 

13 Inventories

Group

Land

Work in progress 

Showhomes

Part-exchange properties

2011  
£000

415

2,100

1,168

3,683

(66)

(66)

2010  
£000

523

2,358

813

3,694

(166)

(166)

3,617

3,528

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

761,690

724,991

439,747

370,911

45,601

23,254

37,819

14,992

1,270,292

1,148,713

Inventories of £742.9 million were expensed in the year (2010 – £659.5 million). 

In the ordinary course of business inventories have been written down by a net £5.0 million (2010 – £4.4 million) in the year.

There has been no exceptional write down of inventories in the period (2010 – £nil) as outlined in note 5 on page 56. 

Land with a carrying value of £20.5 million (2010 – £26.6 million) was used as security for land payables (note 17).

The directors consider all inventories to be essentially current in nature although the Group’s operational cycle is such that a proportion of 
inventories will not be realised within 12 months. It is not possible to determine with accuracy when specific inventory will be realised as this is 
subject to a number of issues including consumer demand and planning permission delays.

The Company has no inventory.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
63

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

32,664

6,305

(904)

(4,574)

20,826

10,451

(637)

2,024

 33,491 

 32,664 

14 Other financial assets

Group

At 1 August

Additions

Redemptions

Imputed interest

At 31 July

Other financial assets carried at fair value are categorised as level 3 within the hierarchical classification of IFRS 7 Revised (as defined within 
the standard).

Other financial assets comprise loans, largely with non-fixed repayment dates and variable repayment amounts, provided as part of sales transactions 
that are secured by way of a second legal charge on the related property. The assets are recorded at fair value, being the estimated amount 
receivable by the Group, discounted to present day values.

The fair value of future anticipated cash receipts takes into account the directors’ view of future house price movements, the expected timing of 
receipts and the likelihood that a purchaser defaults on a repayment. The directors revisit the future anticipated cash receipts from the assets at the 
end of each reporting period.

The difference between the anticipated future receipt and the initial fair value is credited/charged over the estimated deferred term to cost of sales, 
with the financial asset increasing to its full expected cash settlement value on the anticipated receipt date. The imputed interest charged to cost of 
sales for the year ended 31 July 2011 was £4.574 million (2010 – £2.024 million credit).

Credit risk, which the directors currently consider to be largely mitigated through holding a second legal charge over the assets, is accounted for in 
determining present values. The directors review the financial assets for impairment at the end of each reporting period. There were no indicators 
of impairment at 31 July 2011 (2010 – nil). None of the other financial assets are past their due dates (2010 – nil).

At initial recognition, the fair value of the assets is calculated using a discount rate, appropriate to the class of assets, which reflects market conditions 
at the date of entering into the transaction. The directors consider at the end of each reporting period whether the initial market discount rate still 
reflects up to date market conditions. If a revision is required, the fair value of the asset is re-measured at the present value of the revised future cash 
flows using this revised discount rate; the difference between this value and the carrying value of the asset is recorded against the carrying value of 
the asset and recognised directly in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

The directors considered that there was no material difference between the initial market discount rate and the market discount rate at 31 July 2011 
or 31 July 2010 and accordingly have not recognised any movements directly within the Statement of Comprehensive Income to date.

The Company has no other financial assets.

15 Trade and other receivables
Current receivables

Trade receivables

Other receivables

Amounts owed by Group undertakings

Prepayments and accrued income

Group 
2011 
£000

26,316

33,596

–

2,264

62,176

Group 
2010 
£000

Company 
2011 
£000

Company 
2010 
£000

13,000

28,838

–

3

–

–

–

668,389

683,173

3,963

 – 

 – 

45,801

668,392

683,173

The Group assesses the ageing of trade receivables in terms of whether amounts are receivable in less than one year or more than one year. 
None of the trade receivables are past their due dates (2010 – nil).

Other receivables due within one year include £8.938 million (2010 – £8.733 million) in relation to VAT recoverable.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

64

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Notes to the Accounts (continued)

16 Interest bearing loans and borrowings
Non-current liabilities

Bank loans

Preference shares (see note below)

Current liabilities

Bank loans

Preference shares

Group 
2011 
£000

65,000

20,000

Group 
2010 
£000

Company 
2011 
£000

Company 
2010 
£000

80,000

20,000

–

20,000

–

20,000

20,000

85,000

100,000

20,000

Group 
2011 
£000

15,000

Group 
2010 
£000

Company 
2011 
£000

Company 
2010 
£000

–

–

–

Group 
2011 
£000

Group 
2010 
£000

Company 
2011 
£000

Company 
2010 
£000

Authorised, allotted, called up and fully paid

20,000,000 preference shares at 1 August 2010 and 31 July 2011

20,000

20,000

20,000

20,000

With regard to the 9.5% cumulative redeemable preference shares 2014 of £1 each the following rights are attached:

(a) The holders are entitled to a preferential fixed cumulative dividend at an annual rate of 9.5% payable half yearly on 6 April and 6 October.

(b)  The shares are redeemable by the Company at any time at a sum calculated by reference to the yield on 12% Exchequer Stock 2013/2017 

provided such sum is neither less than the nominal value nor more than twice the nominal value of the shares. Any shares still in issue shall be 
redeemed at par on 6 April 2014.

(c)  In the event of a winding up of the Company, the preference shareholders are entitled to a preferential payment in addition to any arrears of 

dividend, equivalent to the nominal value of the preference shares, or in the event of a voluntary winding up, an amount per share calculated by 
reference to the yield on 12% Exchequer Stock 2013/2017, provided such sum is neither less than the nominal value nor more than twice the 
nominal value of the shares.

(d)  The preference shareholders have no ordinary voting rights except in circumstances where the fixed dividend on the preference shares is six 
months in arrears or where the business of a General Meeting includes the consideration of certain resolutions as defined in the Articles of 
Association relating to winding up, changes in the rights of preference shareholders or failure by the Company to redeem the preference shares 
by 6 April 2014.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

65

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Group 
2011 
£000

Group 
2010 
£000

Company 
2011 
£000

Company 
2010 
£000

25,746

16,884

4,782

690

2,834

581

31,218

20,299

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

17 Trade and other payables 
Non-current liabilities

Land payables

Other payables

Accrued expenses and deferred income

Land payables of £1.677 million (2010 – £3.972 million) are secured on the land to which they relate. 

The carrying value of the land used for security is £1.453 million (2010 – £3.378 million).

Current liabilities

Trade payables

Land payables

Social security and other taxes

Other payables

Accrued expenses and deferred income

Payments on account

Group 
2011 
£000

79,956

57,461

2,565

27,449

43,695

35,002

Group 
2010 
£000

Company 
2011 
£000

Company 
2010 
£000

67,973

44,969

2,246

18,830

42,901

48,733

–

–

–

273

601

–

874

–

–

–

243

601

–

844

246,128

225,652

Land payables of £19.651 million (2010 – £24.321 million) are secured on the land to which they relate. 

The carrying value of the land used for security is £19.009 million (2010 – £23.257 million).

18 Financial risk management 
The Group’s financial instruments comprise cash, bank loans and overdrafts and various items such as trade receivables, other financial assets and 
trade payables that arise directly from its operations. The main objective of the Group’s policy towards financial instruments is to maximise returns 
on the Group’s cash balances, manage the Group’s working capital requirements and finance the Group’s ongoing operations. 

The Company’s only financial instruments are cash and preference shares.

Capital Management
The Board’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base to underpin the future development of the business in order to deliver value to shareholders. 
The Group finances its operations through retained earnings, bank borrowings and the management of working capital. From time to time, the 
trustees of the Bellway Employee Share Trust (1992) (the “Trust”) also purchase shares for the future satisfaction of employee share options.

Management of financial risk
The main risks associated with the Group’s financial instruments have been identified as credit risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk. The Board is 
responsible for managing these risks and the policies adopted, which have remained largely unchanged during the year, are set out below.

Credit risk
The Group’s exposure to credit risk is limited by the fact that the Group generally receives cash at the point of legal completion of its sales. 

There is no specific concentration of credit risk in respect of home sales as the exposure is spread over a number of customers. In respect of trade 
receivables and other financial assets, the amounts presented in the balance sheet are stated after adjusting for any doubtful receivables, based on the 
judgement of the Group’s management through using both previous experience and knowledge of the current position (see note 15). In managing 
risk the Group assesses the credit risk of its counterparties before entering into a transaction. No credit limits were exceeded during the reporting 
period or subsequently and the Group does not anticipate any losses from non-performance by these counterparties. In relation to land payables, 
certain payables are secured on the respective land asset held (see note 17). No other security is held against any other financial assets of the Group. 

The Board considers the Group’s exposure to credit risk to be acceptable and normal for an entity of its size given the industry in which it operates. 

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

66

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Notes to the Accounts (continued)

18 Financial risk management (continued)
Liquidity risk
The Group finances its operations through a mixture of equity (comprising share capital, reserves and retained earnings) and debt (comprising bank 
overdraft facilities and borrowings). The Group manages its liquidity risk by monitoring existing facilities and cash flows against forecast requirements 
based on a two year rolling cash forecast. 

The Group’s banking arrangements outlined below are considered to be adequate in terms of flexibility and liquidity for its medium-term cash flow 
needs therefore mitigating the Group’s liquidity risk. 

Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk reflects the Group’s exposure to fluctuations to interest rates in the market. The risk arises because the Group’s overdraft and 
floating rate bank loans bear interest based on either LIBOR or the Bank of England base rate. 

For the year ended 31 July 2011 it is estimated that an increase of 1% in interest rates applying for the full year would decrease the Group’s profit 
before tax by £0.057 million (2010 – increase the Group’s profit before tax by £0.4 million). 

Housing market risk
The Group is affected by movements in UK house prices. These in turn are affected by factors such as credit availability, employment levels, interest 
rates, consumer confidence and supply of land with planning. 

Whilst it is not possible for the Group to fully mitigate housing market risk on a national macroeconomic basis the Group does continually monitor 
its geographical spread within the UK, seeking to balance investment in areas offering the best immediate returns with a long-term spread of its 
operations throughout the UK to minimise the effect of local microeconomic fluctuations.

Land purchased on deferred terms
The Group sometimes acquires land on deferred payment terms. In accordance with IAS 39 the deferred creditor is recorded at fair value being the 
price paid for the land discounted to present day. The difference between the nominal value and the initial fair value is amortised over the deferred 
term to finance expenses, increasing the land creditor to its full cash settlement value on the payment date. 

The maturity profile of the total contracted cash payments in respect of amounts due on land creditors at the balance sheet date is as follows: 

At 31 July 2011

At 31 July 2010

83,207

86,547

58,165

21,336

61,853

65,818

45,790

7,874

Balance at  
31 July  

£000

Total 
contracted  
cash payment 
£000

Within one 
year or on 
demand  
£000

£000

1–2 years  

2–5 years  

More than  
5 years  

£000

1,237

5,090

£000

5,809

7,064

The maturity profile of the total contracted payments in respect of financial liabilities (excluding amounts due on land creditors shown separately 
above) is as follows:

Bank loans – floating rates

Preference shares

Trade and other payables

At 31 July 2011

Bank loans – floating rates

Preference shares

Trade and other payables

At 31 July 2010

Balance at  
31 July  

£000

80,000

20,000

Total 
contracted  
cash payment 
£000

Within one 
year or on 
demand  
£000

1–2 years  

2–5 years  

More than  
5 years  

£000

£000

£000

82,441

25,700

15,990

1,900

114,752

114,752

109,970

25,780

1,900

–

40,671

21,900

–

214,752

222,893

127,860

27,680

62,571

80,000

20,000

91,883

83,480

27,600

91,883

191,883

202,963

1,030

1,900

89,049

91,979

15,990

1,900

–

66,460

23,800

–

17,890

90,260

–

–

4,782

4,782

–

–

2,834

2,834

The interest rates on the preference shares apply to the whole term of the relevant instruments.

The imputed interest rate on land payables reflects market interest rates available to the Group on floating rate bank loans at the time of acquiring 
the land.

At the year end, the Group had £210.0 million (2010 – £225.0 million) of undrawn bank facilities available.

The Company’s only financial liabilities are preference shares as disclosed in the maturity profile above.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
67

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

18 Financial risk management (continued)
Cash and cash equivalents
This comprises cash held by the Group and short-term bank deposits with a maturity date of less than one month.

The amounts of cash and cash equivalents for the years ended 31 July 2011 and 31 July 2010 for both the Group and the Company are shown  
in note 22. 

At 31 July 2011 the average interest rate earned on the temporary closing cash balance was 1.08% (2010 – 1.32%).

The carrying amount of these assets approximates their fair value.

Fair values
Financial assets
The carrying values of financial assets is not materially different to their fair values.

Financial liabilities
A comparison of the book values and fair values of the Group’s fixed rate preference shares and floating rate bank loans at 31 July is as follows:

Preference shares – fixed rate

Bank loans – floating rate

Book  
value  
2011  
£000 

Fair  
value
2011  
£000 

Book  
value
2010  
£000 

20,000

21,500

80,000

76,503

20,000

80,000

Fair  
value
2010  
£000 

21,800

75,275

The fair value of the fixed rate preference shares is based on quoted mid-market prices at 31 July.

In aggregate, the fair values of the Group’s other financial assets and liabilities are not materially different from their book value.

Financial assets and liabilities by category

Other financial assets

Loans and receivables

Cash and cash equivalents

Financial liabilities at amortised cost

19 Issued capital
Group and Company

Allotted, called up and fully paid equity

At 1 August 2010

Issued on exercise of options

Issued for cash in respect of share placing

At 31 July 2011

Group  
2011  
£000

33,491

59,912

Group  
2010  
£000

Company  
2011  
£000

Company  
2010  
£000

32,664

41,838

–

3

–

–

83,412

145,689

48,741

48,856

(309,795)

(257,159)

(20,273)

(20,243)

(132,980)

(36,968)

28,471

28,613

2011  
Number  
000

2011  

£000

2010  
Number 
000

2010  

£000

120,832

15,103

115,006

14,375

16

–

2

–

78

5,748

10

718

120,848

15,105

120,832

15,103

On 6 August 2009 the Group announced the successful placing of 5,747,648 new ordinary shares of 12.5p each (the “Placing Shares”) at a price  
of 779p per Placing Share, raising gross proceeds of £44.774 million (£43.658 million net of issue costs). The Placing Shares issued represented 
approximately 5.0% of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital prior to the Placing.

The Placing Shares are credited as fully paid and rank equally in all respects with the existing ordinary shares, including the right to receive all 
dividends and other distributions declared, made or paid in respect of such shares after the date of the issue of the Placing Shares.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
68

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Notes to the Accounts (continued)

19 Issued capital (continued)
Share options
At 31 July 2011 all outstanding options to purchase ordinary shares in Bellway p.l.c., in accordance with the terms of the applicable schemes, 
were as follows:

Grant date

Number  
of shares

Exercise  
price (p)

Dates from which  
exercisable

Expiry  
date

(a) Bellway p.l.c. (1995) Employee Share Option Scheme

18 April 2002

13 May 2003

10 May 2004

17 November 2004

5,300

18,543

2,500

105,650

131,993

(b) Bellway p.l.c. (1996) Employee Share Option Scheme

18 April 2002

13 May 2003

23 October 2003

10 May 2004

17 November 2004

31 October 2005

16 May 2006

474.00

524.00

712.50

716.00

474.00

524.00

621.50

712.50

716.00

18 April 2005

13 May 2006

10 May 2007

17 November 2007

18 April 2005

13 May 2006

24 October 2006

10 May 2007

17 November 2007

2,000

6,650

6,500

3,500

90,350

249,250

844.00

31 October 2008

750

1122.00

16 May 2009

359,000

(c) Bellway p.l.c. (2005) Employee Share Option Scheme 

31 October 2005

7 February 2007

844.00

1470.00

31 October 2008

7 February 2010

82,750

10,700

93,450

(d) Bellway p.l.c. (2007) Employee Share Option Scheme 

7 February 2007

1470.00

7 February 2010

26,300

26,300

(e) Bellway p.l.c. (2003) Savings Related Share Option Scheme

15 November 2005

14 November 2006

13 November 2007

13 November 2008

13 November 2008

11 November 2009

11 November 2009

12 November 2010

12 November 2010

Total

676.00

1092.00

847.20

336.00

336.00

661.60

661.60

439.60

439.60

2,381

2,932

2,851

564,771

249,243

41,595

14,993

138,709

68,899

1,086,374

1,697,117

1 February 2011

1 February 2012

1 February 2013

1 February 2012

1 February 2014

1 February 2013

1 February 2015

1 February 2014

1 February 2016

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

to

17 April 2012

12 May 2013

9 May 2014

16 November 2014

17 April 2012

12 May 2013

23 October 2013

9 May 2014

16 November 2014

30 October 2015

15 May 2016

30 October 2015

6 February 2017

6 February 2017

31 July 2011

31 July 2012

31 July 2013

31 July 2012

31 July 2014

31 July 2013

31 July 2015

31 July 2014

31 July 2016

Details of directors’ share options are contained within the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration on pages 35 to 42.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

69

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

20 Reserves
Own shares held
The Group and Company hold shares within the Bellway Employee Share Trust (1992) (the “Trust”) for participants of certain share-based payment 
schemes as outlined in note 25. During the period the Trust made a market purchase of 100,000 (2010 – 248,955) shares at an average price of 559p 
(2010 – 714p) and transferred 95,473 (2010 – 148,955) shares to employees. The number of shares held within the Trust, and on which dividends 
have been waived, at 31 July 2011 was 104,527 (2010 – 100,000). These shares are held within the financial statements at a cost of £0.584 million 
(2010 – £0.601 million). The market value of these shares at 31 July 2011 was £0.690 million (2010 – £0.580 million).

Income statement
As permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Company’s income statement has not been included in these financial statements. 
The Company’s loss for the financial year was £1.905 million (2010 – £1.913 million). 

21 Reconciliation of net cash flow to net (debt)/cash
Group

(Decrease)/increase in net cash and cash equivalents

Net cash/(debt) at 1 August

Net (debt)/cash at 31 July

Company

(Decrease)/increase in net cash and cash equivalents

Net cash/(debt) at 1 August

Net cash at 31 July

22 Analysis of net cash/(debt)
Group

Cash and cash equivalents

Bank loans 

Preference shares redeemable after more than one year

Net cash/(debt) 

Company

Cash and cash equivalents

Preference shares redeemable after more than one year

Net cash

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

(62,277)

102,479

45,689

(56,790)

(16,588)

45,689

2011  
£000

(115)

2010  
£000

43,903

28,856

(15,047)

28,741

28,856

At 1 August  
2010  
£000

Cash flows  

£000

At 31 July  
2011  
£000

145,689

(62,277)

83,412

(80,000)

(20,000)

–

–

(80,000)

(20,000)

45,689

(62,277)

(16,588)

At 1 August  
2010  
£000

48,856

(20,000)

28,856

Cash flows  

£000

(115)

At 31 July  
2011  
£000

48,741

–

(20,000)

(115)

28,741

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
70

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Notes to the Accounts (continued)

23 Contingent liabilities
The Company is liable, jointly and severally with other members of the Group, under guarantees given to the Group’s bankers in respect of 
overdrawn balances on certain Group bank accounts and in respect of other overdrafts, loans and guarantees given by the banks to or on behalf 
of other Group undertakings. At 31 July 2011 there were bank overdrafts of £nil (2010 – £nil) and loans of £80.0 million (2010 – £80.0 million). 
The Company has given performance and other trade guarantees on behalf of subsidiary undertakings. The Company has guaranteed the overdrafts 
of jointly controlled entities up to a maximum of £7.5 million (2010 – £7.5 million). 

24 Commitments

Group

Capital commitments

Contracted not provided

Authorised not contracted

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

161

1,450

187

65

Operating leases
At the balance sheet date, the Group had outstanding commitments for future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases, 
which expire as follows:

Expiring within one year

Expiring within the second to fifth years

Expiring in more than five years

2011  
£000

88

3,448

783

4,319

2010  
£000

79

3,157

1,590

4,826

Operating lease payments principally relate to rents payable by the Group for office premises. These leases are subject to periodic rent reviews.

Company
The commitments of the Company were £nil (2010 – £nil)

25 Employee benefits
(a) Retirement benefit obligations
The Group sponsors the Bellway p.l.c. 1972 Pension Scheme (the “Scheme”) which has a funded defined benefit arrangement which is closed 
to new members and to future service accrual. The last full actuarial valuation of the Scheme was carried out by a qualified independent actuary 
as at 1 August 2008 and updated on an approximate basis to 31 July 2011. 

The Group also sponsors the Bellway plc 2008 Group Self Invested Personal Pension Plan (“GSIPP”) which is a defined contribution contract-based 
arrangement.

Contributions to the GSIPP of £1.919 million (2010 – £1.763 million) were charged to the income statement.

With regard to the Scheme, the regular contributions made by the employer over the financial year were £nil (2010 – £nil). The employer also paid 
special contributions amounting to £nil (2010 – £1.668 million). Expenses were paid in addition. 

It is the policy of the Group to recognise all actuarial gains and losses in the year in which they occur outside the income statement and in the 
statement of comprehensive income. 

Insured pensions and defined contributions have been excluded from the assets and liabilities.

Present values of defined benefit obligations, fair value of Scheme assets and deficit:

Present value of defined benefit obligation

Fair value of Scheme assets

Deficit in Scheme

As all actuarial gains and assets are recognised, the deficits shown above are those recognised in the balance sheet.

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

(44,246)

(41,896)

35,845

33,160

(8,401)

(8,736)

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

71

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

41,896

39,870

–

2,200

1,713

(43)

2,277

987

(1,563)

(1,195)

44,246

41,896

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

33,160

27,945

1,774

2,474

–

1,864

2,878

1,668

(1,563)

(1,195)

35,845

33,160

2011  
£000

–

2010  
£000

(43)

2,200

2,277

(1,774)

(1,864)

426

370

25 Employee benefits (continued)
Best estimate of contributions to be paid to the Scheme for the year ended 31 July 2012
This best estimate of contributions to be paid to the Scheme for the year ending 31 July 2012 is £nil (2011 – £nil).

Reconciliation of opening and closing balances of the present value of the defined benefit obligation:

Defined benefit obligation at start of year

Current service cost

Interest cost

Actuarial loss

Benefit paid, death in service insurance premiums and expenses

Defined benefit obligation at end of year

Reconciliation of opening and closing balances of the fair value of Scheme assets:

Fair value of assets at start of year

Expected return on assets

Actuarial gains

Contributions by employer

Benefit paid, death in service insurance premiums and expenses

Fair value of assets at end of year

Total expense recognised in the income statement:

Current service income

Interest on liabilities

Expected return on assets

Total expense

Of the total expense, £nil (2010 – £0.043 million income) is recognised within administrative expenses and an expense of £0.426 million 
(2010 – £0.413 million) is recognised within finance expenses.

Gains/(losses) recognised in the statement of comprehensive income:

Difference between expected and actual return on Scheme assets

Experience gains and losses arising on the Scheme liabilities

Effects of changes in the demographic and financial assumptions 
underlying the present value of the Scheme liabilities

Total gain recognised in statement of 
comprehensive income

2011 
%

2010 
%

2011 
£000

2,474

(72)

2010 
£000

2,878

813

(1,641)

(1,800)

7

0

4

761

1,891

(2)

9 of Scheme assets

(2) of the present value  

of Scheme liabilities

4 of the present value  
of Scheme liabilities

(5) of the present value  

of Scheme liabilities

The cumulative amount of actuarial gains and losses recognised in the statement of comprehensive income since adoption of IAS 19 is a loss 
of £13.320 million.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

72

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Notes to the Accounts (continued)

25 Employee benefits (continued)
Assets
The fair value of Scheme assets is:

Equities

Bonds

Cash

Total 

2011  
£000

2010  
£000

23,686

12,001

158

21,578

11,075

507

35,845

33,160

None of the fair values of the assets shown above include any of the Group’s own financial instruments or any property occupied by, or other assets 
used by, the Group.

Expected long-term rates of return
The expected long-term return on cash is related to bank base rates at the balance sheet date. The expected return on bonds is determined by 
reference to UK long dated gilt and bond yields at the balance sheet date. The expected rate of return on equities has been determined by setting 
an appropriate risk premium above gilt/bond yields having regard to market conditions at the balance sheet date.

The expected long-term rates of return are as follows:

Equities

Bonds

Cash

Overall for Scheme

Actual return on Scheme assets
The actual return on the Scheme assets over the year ended 31 July 2011 was 12.80% (31 July 2010 – 16.97%).

Assumptions

Inflation

Salary increases

Rate of discount

Allowance for pension in payment increases of RPI or 5% p.a. if less

Allowance for revaluation of deferred pensions of RPI or 5% p.a. if less

Allowance for revaluation of deferred pensions of CPI or 5% p.a. if less

Allowance for commutation of pension for cash at retirement

Period 
commencing  
1 August  
2010 
% per annum

Period 
commencing  
1 August  
2009 
% per annum

5.70

5.10

4.20

5.48

7.50

5.65

4.50

6.61

2011 
% per annum

2010 
% per annum

3.75

4.75

5.30

3.75

n/a

3.05

–

3.45

4.45

5.35

3.45

3.45

n/a

–

The mortality assumptions adopted at 31 July 2011 are based on the PA00 tables using the long cohort improvements and allow for future 
improvement in mortality. The tables used imply the following life expectancies at age 65:

Male retiring at age 65 in 2011   
Female retiring at age 65 in 2011 
Male retiring at age 65 in 2031   
Female retiring at age 65 in 2031 

23.2 years 
25.7 years 
25.2 years 
27.6 years

With effect from 1 January 2011 the UK Government changed the basis for both statutory revaluation of pension scheme benefits and increases 
to pensions under defined benefit pension schemes, from RPI to CPI measures. Where this change affects the future obligations under the Scheme, 
the change has been accounted for as a change in the financial assumptions used to measure the defined benefit obligation.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

73

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

25 Employee benefits (continued)
Amounts for the current and previous four years

Fair value of assets

Defined benefit obligation

Deficit in Scheme

Experience adjustment on Scheme liabilities

Experience adjustment on Scheme assets

Effects of changes in the demographic and financial assumptions 
underlying the present value of the plan liabilities

2011 
£000

2010 
£000

2009 
£000

2008 
£000

2007 
£000

35,845

33,160

27,945

34,763

49,545

(44,246)

(41,896)

(39,870)

(47,472)

(51,531)

(8,401)

(8,736)

(11,925)

(12,709)

(1,986)

(72)

2,474

813

2,878

5,351

(3,997)

(1,001)

(6,248)

(967)

1,262

(1,641)

(1,800)

(1,001)

(7,102)

4,973

(b) Share-based payments
The Group operates a long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”), an annual bonus scheme, employee share option schemes (“ESOS”) and Savings Related 
Share Option Schemes (“SRSOS”) all of which are detailed below. IFRS 2 has been applied to options granted after 7 November 2002, which had 
not vested at 1 January 2005. 

Awards under the LTIP have been made to executive directors and the Group Company Secretary, with awards under the annual bonus scheme 
also made to senior employees. The awards take the form of ordinary shares in the Company.

Share options issued under the Bellway p.l.c. (1995) Employee Share Option Scheme (“1995 ESOS”) have been granted to employees at all levels as 
well as to executive directors. The last tranche of shares was awarded to directors in October 2003. No further options may be granted under this 
scheme. Options issued under the Bellway p.l.c. (1996) Employee Share Option Scheme (“1996 ESOS”) have been granted to employees at all levels 
as well as to executive directors. The last tranche of shares was awarded to employees in May 2006. No further options may be granted under this 
scheme. The Bellway p.l.c. (2005) Employee Share Option Scheme (“2005 ESOS”) replaces the 1995 ESOS. Awards may be granted on a 
discretionary basis to employees at all levels as well as to executive directors and are subject to performance conditions. The Bellway p.l.c. (2007) 
Employee Share Option Scheme (“2007 ESOS”) replaces the 1996 ESOS. It is an unapproved discretionary scheme which provides for the grant of 
options over ordinary shares to employees and executive directors. It is, however, the current intention that no executive directors of the Company 
should be granted options under the scheme. Awards will be available to vest after three years, subject to objective performance targets. 

Options issued under the SRSOS are offered to all employees including the executive directors. 

An outline of the performance conditions in relation to the above Schemes is detailed under the long-term incentive scheme section on pages 38 
and 41 within the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration. 

For awards made prior to 16 January 2008, vesting of awards under the LTIP is dependent upon total shareholder return of the Group measured 
against relevant comparator companies as detailed on page 41 within the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration. For awards made 
on 16 January 2008, vesting of awards is dependent upon two conditions, total shareholder return and return on capital employed. For awards 
made on 4 November 2008, 29 October 2009 and 21 October 2010, vesting of awards is dependent only on total shareholder return as detailed 
on page 41 within the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration.

With regard to the annual bonus scheme, for awards up to and including those for the year ended 31 July 2006, one half was payable in November 
each year following the announcement of the Group’s annual results. The other half was used to acquire Bellway shares at the prevailing market 
value. These shares are held in the Bellway Employee Share Trust (1992) for three years. The shares can then be transferred into the employee’s 
name. In addition, various small share awards were made for years 2003 through to 2007 to employees, mainly at divisional management level. 
These awards mainly had three year vesting periods. Awards to executive directors and to the Group Company Secretary in relation to the year 
ended 31 July 2007, and subsequent years, are made in cash with no compulsory deferral element. 

Share-based payments have been valued by an external third party using various models detailed below, based on publicly available market data 
at the time of the grant, which the directors consider to be the most appropriate method of determining their fair value.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

74

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Notes to the Accounts (continued)

25 Employee benefits (continued)
The number and weighted average exercise price of share-based payments is as follows:

LTIP and annual bonus

Outstanding at the beginning of the year

Granted during the year

Exercised during the year

Lapsed during the year

Forfeited during the year

Outstanding at the end of the year

Exercisable at the end of the year

2011  
Number of 
options

2010  
Number of 
options

620,587

255,447

571,747

197,335

(95,473)

(148,495)

(91,490)

(31,220)

–

–

657,851

620,587

8,032

3,000

The options outstanding at 31 July 2011 have a weighted average contractual life of 1.2 years (2010 – 1.3 years). The weighted average share price at 
the date of exercise for share options exercised during the year was 658.7p (2010 – 765.5p).

1995, 1996, 2005 and 2007 ESOS, and SRSOS

Outstanding at the beginning of the year

Granted during the year

Lapsed during the year

Forfeited during the year

Exercised during the year

Outstanding at the end of the year

Exercisable at the end of the year

2011  
Number of 
options

2010  
Number of 
options

1,682,152

1,815,198

227,465

111,531

(150,291)

(83,383)

(46,000)

(83,400)

(16,209)

(77,794)

1,697,117

1,682,152

613,124

676,312

The options outstanding at 31 July 2011 have an exercise price in the range of 336.0p to 1,470.0p (2010 – 336.0p to 1,470.0p) and have a weighted 
average contractual life of 2.7 years (2010 – 3.5 years). The weighted average share price at the date of exercise for share options exercised during 
the year was 675.6p (2010 – 681.3p).

Valuation methodology
For the LTIP, a Monte Carlo simulation method is used which allows the Group’s performance, in terms of total shareholder return, to be measured 
against its comparator companies. Individual share price volatilities are calculated for each of the comparator companies. A correlation assumption, 
appropriate to the building sector, is also used.

In the case of the deferred element of the annual bonus, a simplified Black Scholes method is applied with an exercise price and dividend yield of 
zero. This is because no performance conditions attach to the award and no dividends are credited to the individual. The result is that the fair value 
equates to the face value of the award. 

The Black Scholes method is used for the SRSOS due to the relatively short exercise window of six months.

For the 1995, 1996, 2005 and 2007 ESOSs, a lattice method is used which enables early exercise behaviour to be modelled in a more sophisticated 
manner than under Black Scholes. 

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

75

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

25 Employee benefits (continued)
The fair value of services received in return for share options granted are measured by reference to the fair value of the share options granted. 
The inputs into the models for the various grants in the current and previous year were as follows: 

Scheme description

3 Year SRSOS 5 Year SRSOS

LTIP

3 Year SRSOS

5 Year SRSOS

2011

2010

November 
2010

November 
2010

October 
2010

November  
2009

November 
2009 

October 
2009

LTIP

Grant date 

Risk free interest rate 

Exercise price

Share price at date of grant

Expected dividend yield

Expected life

Vesting date

Expected volatility

Fair value of option

12 Nov 2010

12 Nov 2010

21 Oct 2010

11 Nov 2009

11 Nov 2009

29 Oct 2009

1.4%

439.6p

538.5p

3.00%

2.1%

439.6p

538.5p

3.00%

3 years 
2 months

5 years 
2 months

0%

 – 

549.5p

3.00%

3 years

2.1%

661.6p

750.5p

3.00%

2.9%

661.6p

750.5p

3.00%

3 years  
2 months

5 years  
2 months

0%

 – 

715.0p

3.00%

3 years

1 Feb 2014

1 Feb 2016

21 Oct 2013

1 Feb 2013

1 Feb 2015

29 Oct 2012

55%

212p

45%

205p

55%

213p

55%

284p

45%

279p

55%

360p

The expected volatility for all models was determined by considering the volatility levels historically for the Group. Volatility levels for more recent 
years were considered to have more relevance than earlier years for the period reviewed.

The Group recognised total expenses of £0.957 million (2010 – £1.372 million) in relation to equity-settled share-based payment transactions. 

26 Related party transactions
The Board and certain members of senior management are related parties within the definition of IAS 24 “Related party disclosures”. Summary 
information of the transactions with key management personnel is provided in note 3. Detailed disclosure of individual remuneration of Board 
members is included in the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration on pages 35 to 42. There is no difference between transactions 
with key management personnel of the Company and the Group.

Transactions between fellow subsidiaries, which are related parties, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed.

Group
During the year the Group entered into the following related party transactions with its jointly controlled entities:

Invoiced to jointly controlled entities in respect of accounting, management fees, interest on loans, 
land purchases and infrastructure works

Invoiced from jointly controlled entities in respect of fees, land purchases and infrastructure works

Amounts owed to jointly controlled entities in respect of land purchases and management fees

Amounts owed by jointly controlled entities in respect of accounting, management fees, interest, 
land purchases and infrastructure works

2011  
£000

1,310

(2,988)

(646)

2010  
£000

850

(929)

(440)

36,763

34,703

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

76

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Accounts
Notes to the Accounts (continued)

26 Related party transactions (continued)
Company
During the year the Company entered into the following related party transactions with its subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities:

Amounts received in the year from subsidiaries in respect of dividends and shares issued

2011  
£000

230

2010  
£000

435

Amounts paid in the year by subsidiaries on behalf of the Company in respect of dividends and finance expenses

(15,014)

(13,380)

Amounts owed by subsidiaries in respect of dividends and shares issued net of amounts paid on behalf of the Company

668,389

683,173

27 Principal subsidiary undertakings
The directors set out below information relating to the major subsidiary undertakings (those that principally affect the profits and assets of the 
Group) of Bellway p.l.c. taking advantage of the exemption in section 410 of the Companies Act 2006 not to disclose all subsidiary undertakings. 
All of these companies are registered in England and Wales, are engaged in housebuilding and associated activities, have coterminous year ends 
with the Group, and 100% of their ordinary share capital is held by the Company (unless otherwise stated).

Bellway Homes Limited 
Bellway Properties Limited 
Bellway (Services) Limited 
Litrose Investments Limited 
Bellway Financial Services Limited 
Bellway Housing Trust Limited 
The Victoria Dock Company Limited (60% owned)*

* These shares are held indirectly.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

Other Information
Five Year Record

Income statement

Revenue

Operating profit 

Exceptional items

Net finance expenses

Share of losses of associates

Profit/(loss) before taxation 

Income tax (expense)/credit

Profit/(loss) for the year (all attributable to 
equity holders of the parent)

Balance sheet

ASSETS

Non-current assets

Current assets

LIABILITIES

Non-current liabilities

Current liabilities

EQUITY

Total equity

Statistics

Dividend per ordinary share

Basic earnings/(loss) per ordinary share

Number of homes sold

Average price of new homes

Operating margin

Net assets per ordinary share

Land portfolio – plots with planning permission

77

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

2007 
£m

2008 
£m

2009 
£m

2010 
£m

2011 
£m

1,354.0

253.0

–

(17.9)

(0.3)

234.8

(68.1)

166.7

28.1

1,608.5

(126.9)

(473.9)

1,149.5

185.1*

(130.9)

(19.1)

(0.3)

34.8

(7.8)

27.0

29.3

1,667.7

(359.0)

(336.9)

683.8

45.6*

(66.3)

(15.8)

–

(36.5)

9.1

(27.4)

768.3

51.3

–

(6.9)

–

44.4

(8.6)

35.8

886.1

75.2

–

(8.0)

–

67.2

(17.0)

50.2

43.8

1,306.2

52.3

55.1

1,340.2

1,415.9

(138.8)

(246.2)

(129.2)

(228.5)

(124.7)

(273.0)

1,035.8

1,001.1

965.0

1,034.8

1,073.3

43.125p

146.1p

7,638

24.1p

23.6p*

6,556

£173.3k

£169.9k

18.7%

903p

23,500

16.1%*

871p

9.0p

(23.9)p*

4,380

£154.0k

6.7%*

839p

10.0p

29.7p

4,595

12.5p

41.5p

 4,922 

£163.2k

£175.6k

6.7%

856p

8.5%

888p

22,500

19,260

17,602

 18,086 

Weighted average no. of ordinary shares 

114,108,350

114,615,661

114,949,883

120,619,800 120,705,397

No. of ordinary shares in issue at end of year

114,670,396

114,950,915

115,006,480

120,831,922 120,848,131

* Stated before exceptional items.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

78

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Other Information
Shareholder Information

Annual General Meeting (“AGM”)
This section is important. If you are in any doubt as to what action to take you should consult an appropriate independent financial adviser.

If you have sold or transferred all of your shares in Bellway p.l.c. you should pass this document and all accompanying documents to the person 
through whom the sale or transfer was effected, for transmission to the purchaser or transferee.

Special business
Four resolutions will be proposed as special business at the forthcoming AGM. The effect of these resolutions is as follows:

Resolution 12 – Authority to directors to issue shares
This is an ordinary resolution which authorises the directors to allot ordinary shares up to an aggregate nominal value of £5,035,348, which is 
equivalent to approximately one-third of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital as at 17 October 2011, and also gives the directors authority 
to allot, by way of rights issue only, ordinary shares up to an aggregate nominal value of £10,070,696 which is equivalent to approximately two-thirds 
of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital as at 17 October 2011, such authority, if granted, to expire at the conclusion of the AGM of the 
Company to be held in 2013. As at 17 October 2011 the Company held no shares as treasury shares. At present, the directors only intend to use  
this authority to satisfy the exercise of awards under the Company’s share schemes. The directors wish to obtain the necessary authority from 
shareholders so that allotments can be made (if required and if suitable market conditions arise) at short notice and without the need to convene  
a general meeting of the Company which would be both costly and time consuming.

Resolution 13 – Disapplication of pre-emption rights
This is a special resolution and is the customary annual request, in substitution for the authority granted to the directors by shareholders on 7 January 
2011 which expires at the conclusion of the forthcoming AGM, that shareholders empower the directors to allot ordinary shares for cash without 
first offering them pro rata to existing shareholders as would otherwise be required by section 561 of the Companies Act 2006 (a) in connection 
with a rights issue or other pre-emptive offer and (b) (otherwise than in connection with a rights issue or other pre-emptive offer) up to an aggregate 
nominal value of £755,302, being approximately equal to 5% of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as at 17 October 2011.

Resolution 14 – Company’s purchase of its own shares
The Company’s authority to purchase its own ordinary and preference shares, given at the last AGM, expires at the conclusion of the forthcoming 
AGM. This authority was not used during the year. The directors propose, as a special resolution, that it should be renewed for a further year to 
expire on the date of the 2013 AGM.

The directors will review opportunities to use this authority in light of stock market conditions and trading opportunities during the year.

The directors will only make purchases (which will reduce the number of shares in issue) after paying due attention to the effect on the financing of 
the Group, its assets and earnings per share for the remaining shareholders. Any shares purchased under this authority may be cancelled (in which 
case the number of shares in issue will be reduced accordingly) or may be held in treasury.

Resolution 15 – Length of notice of meeting
Shareholder approval for general meetings of the Company other than AGMs to be held on 14 days’ notice, given at the last AGM, expires at the 
conclusion of the forthcoming AGM. There is no current intention to use this authority and the Company will only consider using this authority 
where it is considered that this would be for the benefit of shareholders as a whole. The directors propose, as a special resolution, that it should  
be renewed for a further year to expire on the date of the 2013 AGM.

Recommendation
Your directors consider each of the resolutions set out in the Notice of AGM to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders as a 
whole. Accordingly, they unanimously recommend that you vote in favour of the resolutions as they intend to do in respect of their own beneficial 
shareholdings.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

79

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Takeovers Directive
Where not provided in the Directors’ Report the following sets out the information required to be provided to shareholders in compliance with  
the Takeovers Directive.

Share capital
The Company’s total issued ordinary and preference share capital as at 31 July 2011 consisted of 120,848,131 ordinary shares of 12.5p each 
(representing 43% of the Company’s total issued share capital) and 20,000,000 9.5% Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares 2014 of £1 each 
(representing 57% of the Company’s total issued share capital). Further details of the issued capital of the Company and brief details of the rights in 
relation to the preference shares can be found in note 16 to the accounts. The rights and obligations attaching to the ordinary and preference shares 
in the Company are set out in the Articles of Association (the “Articles”). Copies of the Articles can be obtained from Companies House or by 
writing to the Group Company Secretary at the Company’s registered office.

Restrictions on the transfer of shares 
The restrictions on the transfer of shares are set out in the Articles. In addition, in compliance with the FSA Listing Rules, Company approval 
is required for directors, certain employees and their connected persons to deal in the Company’s ordinary shares. No person has special rights 
of control over the Company’s share capital.

Rights in relation to the shares held in the employee benefit trust
The voting rights on shares held in the Trust in relation to the Company’s employee share schemes are exercisable by the trustees.

Restrictions on voting rights
Details of the deadlines for exercising voting rights are set out in the Company’s Articles. The directors are not aware of any agreements between 
shareholders that may result in restrictions on the transfer of securities or on voting rights.

Appointment and replacement of directors
The Company’s rules about the appointment and replacement of directors are set out in the Articles and are summarised in the Directors’ Report 
on page 30. In accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code all the directors are seeking annual re-election by shareholders with the 
exception, this year, of Mr Leitch who retires from the Board on 31 January 2012 and does not seek re-election.

Amendments to the Company’s Articles of Association
The Company may amend its Articles by passing a special resolution at a general meeting of its shareholders.

Powers of the Board
The business and affairs of the Company are managed by the directors, who may exercise all such powers of the Company as are not by law or by 
the Articles required to be exercised by the Company in general meetings. Subject to the provisions of the Articles, all powers of the directors are 
exercised at meetings of the directors which have been validly convened and at which a quorum is present.

Allotment of shares
During the year 16,209 new ordinary shares were issued to satisfy awards made under the Company’s employee share schemes. The directors have 
authority to allot shares within limits agreed by shareholders. Details of the renewal of this authority are set out on page 78, and Resolutions 12 and 
13 in the Notice of Meeting of the AGM to be held on 13 January 2012 on pages 82 and 83 seek to renew this authority.

Purchase of own shares 
The Company has not purchased any of its own shares during the year. The directors have authority to purchase the Company’s own shares within 
limits agreed by shareholders. Details of the renewal of this authority are set out on page 78, and Resolution 14 in the Notice of Meeting of the AGM 
to be held on 13 January 2012 on page 83 seeks to renew this authority.

Significant agreements – change of control provisions
The Company is party to a number of banking agreements which may be terminable in the event of a change of control of the Company.

Agreements for compensation for loss of office following a change of control
The service agreements between the Company and Mr Watson, Mr Leitch and the Group Company Secretary contain provisions that entitle the 
individual to terminate the agreement following a takeover offer and receive an amount equivalent to one year’s salary, benefits and the average 
amount of the last two years’ annual bonus payment. 

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

80

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Other Information
Shareholder Information (continued)

Financial calendar

Announcement of results and ordinary dividends

  Half year

Full year 

Ordinary share dividend payments

Interim 

Final 

Preference share dividend payments at the rate 
of 9.5% per annum paid half yearly 

Annual report posted to shareholders 

Final ordinary dividend – ex-dividend date 

Final ordinary dividend – record date 

AGM 

Final ordinary dividend – payment date 

Ordinary shareholders by size of holding at 31 July 2011

March

October

July

January

April and October

November

14 December 2011

16 December 2011

13 January 2012

18 January 2012

0 – 2,000 

2,001 – 10,000 

10,001 – 50,000

50,001 and over 

Total 

Holdings

Shares

Number

1,811

396

133

191

%

Holding

71.55

15.65

5.25

7.55

1,156,385

1,685,474

3,345,749

114,660,523

2,531

100.00

120,848,131

%

0.96

1.39

2.77

94.88

100.00

Dividend Re-Investment Plan (“DRIP”)
Shareholders may agree to participate in the Company’s DRIP to receive dividends in the form of shares in Bellway p.l.c. instead of in cash. 
For further information please e-mail Capita Registrars Limited at shares@capitaregistrars.com or telephone 0871 664 0300 – calls cost 10p per 
minute plus network extras. If calling from overseas please call +44 208 639 3399. Lines are open from 8.30 am to 5.30 pm on Monday to Friday 
(excluding Bank Holidays).

Non-sterling bank account
If you reside outside the UK, or have a non-sterling bank account, Capita Registrars can now convert your dividend into your local currency and 
send you the funds by currency draft, or they may be able to pay them straight into your overseas bank account. For further information on Capita’s 
International Payment Service e-mail Capita Registrars Limited at IPS@capitaregistrars.com or telephone +44 208 639 3405. Lines are open from 
9.00 am to 5.30 pm London time on Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays).

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
 
81

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Share dealing service
The Company’s registrars, Capita Registrars Limited, provide a share dealing service to existing shareholders to buy or sell the Company’s shares. 
Online and telephone dealing facilities provide an easy to access and simple to use service.

For further information on this service, or to buy or sell shares, please contact: www.capitadeal.com for online dealing, or telephone 0871 664 0364 
for telephone dealing.

Please note that the directors of the Company are not seeking to encourage shareholders to either buy or sell their shares in the Company. 
Shareholders in any doubt as to what action to take are recommended to seek financial advice from an independent financial adviser, authorised 
under the terms of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

Discount to shareholders
The following discount arrangement is currently available to shareholders.

Should you intend to purchase a new Bellway home, you will be entitled to a discount of £2,000 per £25,000, or pro rata on part thereof, of the 
purchase price provided that:

(a)  you have been the registered holder of at least 2,000 ordinary shares for a minimum period of 12 months prior to the reservation of your new 

home; and

(b) you inform our sales representative on-site when reserving your property that you are claiming shareholder discount.

The above discount arrangement is only available to shareholders on the Company’s Register of Members. Employees of investing companies 
or members of investing institutions would not therefore be eligible. Underlying beneficial shareholders would be entitled to benefit from the 
arrangements.

For further details please contact the Group Company Secretary, Bellway p.l.c., Seaton Burn House, Dudley Lane, Seaton Burn, Newcastle upon 
Tyne NE13 6BE, telephone 0191 217 0717 or e-mail investor.relations@bellway.co.uk.

Beneficial owners of shares with “information rights”
Beneficial owners of shares who have been nominated by the registered holder of those shares to receive information rights under section 146 of the 
Companies Act 2006 are required to direct all communications to the registered holder of their shares rather than to the Company’s registrar, 
Capita Registrars Limited, or to the Company directly.

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Further reporting on the Company’s Corporate Social Responsibility activities is available to view in the Corporate Social Responsibility section of the 
Company’s website www.bellway.co.uk.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

82

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Other Information
Notice of Annual General Meeting

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at The Copthorne Hotel, The Close, Quayside, 
Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3RT on Friday 13 January 2012 at 12.00 noon for the following purposes:

Ordinary business
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolutions which will be proposed as ordinary resolutions:

1.   THAT the Accounts for the financial year ended 31 July 2011 and the Directors’ Report and the Auditors’ Report on those Accounts and the 

auditable part of the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration be received and adopted.

2.  THAT a final dividend for the year ended 31 July 2011 of 8.8p per ordinary 12.5p share, as recommended by the directors, be declared.

3.  THAT Mr H C Dawe be re-elected as a director of the Company.

4.  THAT Mr J K Watson be re-elected as a director of the Company.

5.  THAT Mr E F Ayres be re-elected as a director of the Company.

6.  THAT Mr P M Johnson be re-elected as a director of the Company.

7.  THAT Mr M R Toms be re-elected as a director of the Company.

8.  THAT Mr J A Cuthbert be re-elected as a director of the Company.

9.   THAT KPMG Audit Plc be re-appointed as the auditors of the Company to hold office from the conclusion of this meeting until the conclusion 

of the next general meeting at which Accounts are laid before the Company.

10. THAT the directors are authorised to agree the remuneration of the auditors of the Company.

11.  THAT the Report of the Board on Directors’ Remuneration shown on pages 35 to 42 of the Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 

31 July 2011 be approved.

Special business
To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolution which will be proposed as an ordinary resolution:

12.  THAT the directors be generally and unconditionally authorised pursuant to and in accordance with section 551 of the Companies Act 2006 

(the “Act”) to exercise all the powers of the Company to:

(a)   allot shares in the Company and to grant rights to subscribe for, or to convert any security into, shares in the Company (“Rights”) up to a 

maximum nominal amount of £5,035,348; and

(b)  allot equity securities (within the meaning of section 560 of the Act) up to a maximum nominal amount of £10,070,696 (such amount to be 

reduced by the nominal amount of any shares issued or in respect of which Rights are granted under (a) above) in connection with an offer by 
way of a rights issue to ordinary shareholders in proportion (as nearly as may be practicable) to their existing holdings and so that the directors 
may impose any limits or restrictions and make any arrangements which they consider necessary or appropriate to deal with fractional 
entitlements, record dates, legal, regulatory or practical problems in, or under the laws of, any territory or any other matter, provided that:

(i)   this authority shall expire at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in 2013, but may be previously 

revoked or varied by an ordinary resolution of the Company; and

(ii)  this authority shall permit and enable the Company to make offers or agreements before the expiry of this authority which would or might 
require shares to be allotted or Rights to be granted after such expiry and the directors shall be entitled to allot shares and grant Rights 
pursuant to any such offers or agreements as if this authority had not expired; and

(iii)  all unexercised authorities previously granted to the directors to allot shares and grant Rights be and are hereby revoked.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
83

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

To consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolutions which will be proposed as special resolutions:

13. THAT,

(a)  subject to resolution 12 above being passed as an ordinary resolution, the directors be empowered pursuant to section 570 and section 573 
of the Companies Act 2006 (“the Act”) to allot equity securities (within the meaning of section 560 of the Act) for cash pursuant to the 
authority so conferred or by way of sale of treasury shares in each case as if section 561(1) of the Act did not apply to any such allotment, 
provided that this power shall be limited to:

(i)   the allotment of equity securities in connection with a pre-emptive offer (but in the case of the authority conferred under paragraph (b) 

of resolution 12 in connection with an offer by way of rights issue only); and

(ii)  the allotment to any person or persons (otherwise than pursuant to paragraph (i) above) of equity securities up to an aggregate nominal 

amount of £755,302;

(b)  the power given by this resolution shall expire at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in 2013 except that 
the Company may, before such expiry, make an offer or agreement which would, or might, require equity securities to be allotted after such 
expiry and the directors may allot equity securities pursuant to such an offer or agreement as if the power conferred by this resolution had not 
expired; and

(c)  for the purposes of this resolution, “pre-emptive offer” means a rights issue, open offer or other offer of equity securities open for acceptance 
for a fixed period, by the directors to ordinary shareholders of the Company on the Register on a fixed record date in proportion (as nearly 
as may be) to their then holdings of such equity securities (but subject to such exclusions or other arrangements as the directors may deem 
necessary or expedient to deal with legal or practical problems under the laws of, or the requirements of, any regulatory body or any stock 
exchange in, any overseas territory or fractional entitlements or any other matter whatsoever).

14.  THAT the Company be generally and unconditionally authorised for the purposes of section 701 of the Companies Act 2006 (“the Act”) to 
purchase ordinary shares and preference shares in the capital of the Company by way of one or more market purchases (within the meaning  
of section 693 of the Act) on the London Stock Exchange upon, and subject to the following conditions:

(a)  the maximum number of ordinary shares hereby authorised to be purchased is 12,084,835, being approximately 10 per cent of the ordinary 

shares in issue;

(b)  the maximum number of preference shares hereby authorised to be purchased is 20,000,000 9.5% Cumulative Redeemable Preference 

Shares 2014 of £1 each, being the total amount of preference shares in issue;

(c)  the maximum price at which ordinary shares may be purchased is an amount equal to 105 per cent of the average of the middle market 
quotations derived from the London Stock Exchange Official List for the five business days immediately preceding the date on which the 
ordinary shares are contracted to be purchased and the minimum price is 12.5p per share, in both cases exclusive of expenses;

(d)  the maximum price at which preference shares may be purchased shall be an amount calculated in accordance with the provisions contained 

in the Articles of Association of the Company and the minimum price is £1 per share; and

(e)   unless previously renewed, varied or revoked, the authority to purchase conferred by this resolution shall expire at the conclusion of the 

next Annual General Meeting of the Company or, if earlier, 15 months after the passing of this resolution provided that any contract for the 
purchase of any shares, as aforesaid, which was concluded before the expiry of the said authority may be executed wholly or partly after the 
said authority expires and the relevant shares purchased pursuant thereto.

15.  THAT a general meeting of the Company, other than an annual general meeting of the Company, may be called on not less than 14 clear 

days’ notice.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
84

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Other Information
Notice of Annual General Meeting (continued)

Notes:

(i)   A member entitled to attend and vote at the meeting convened by the above notice may appoint one or more proxies to attend and speak and vote instead of him/her, provided that  

each proxy is appointed to exercise the rights attached to a different share or shares held by that member. A proxy need not be a member of the Company.

(ii)   A form of proxy is enclosed separately. Completion and return of the form of proxy will not preclude shareholders from attending in person and voting at the meeting.

(iii)   CREST members will be able to cast their vote using CREST electronic proxy voting using the procedures described in the CREST Manual (available via www.euroclear.com/CREST).  

In order to be valid, the Company’s registrars must receive CREST Proxy Instructions not less than 48 hours before the time of the meeting or any adjourned meeting.

(iv)   The above statement as to proxy rights contained in note (i) above does not apply to a person who receives this notice of general meeting as a person nominated to enjoy “information 
rights” under section 146 of the Companies Act 2006. If you have been sent this notice of meeting because you are such a nominated person, the following statements apply: (a) you may 
have a right under an agreement between you and the member of the Company by whom you were nominated to be appointed or to have someone else appointed as a proxy for this 
general meeting; and (b) if you have no such right or do not wish to exercise it, you may have a right under such an agreement to give instructions to that member as to the exercise of voting 
rights. Nominated persons should contact the registered member by whom they were nominated in respect of these arrangements.

(v)   To be entitled to attend and vote at the meeting (and for the purposes of determination by the Company of the number of votes cast), shareholders must be entered on the Company’s 

Register of Members at 5.30 pm on Wednesday 11 January 2012 (or, in the event of any adjournment, at 5.30 pm on the date which is two days prior to the adjourned meeting). Changes to 
the Register of Members after the relevant deadline shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to attend and vote at the meeting or adjourned meeting.

(vi)   Pursuant to section 527 of the Companies Act 2006, where requested by either a member or members having a right to vote at the general meeting and holding at least 5% of total voting 
rights of the Company or at least 100 members having a right to vote at the meeting and holding, on average, at least £100 per member of paid up share capital, the Company must publish 
on its website a statement setting out any matter that such members propose to raise at the meeting relating to either the audit of the Company’s accounts that are to be laid before the 
meeting or the circumstances connected with an auditor ceasing to hold office since the last meeting at which accounts were laid. Where the Company is required to publish such a 
statement on its website, it may not require the members making the request to pay any expenses incurred by the Company in complying with the request. It must forward the statement 
to the Company’s auditors and the statement may be dealt with as part of the business of the meeting.

(vii)  Any member attending the meeting has the right to ask questions. The Company must cause to be answered any such questions relating to the business being dealt with at the meeting but 
no such answer need be given if (a) to do so would interfere unduly with the preparation of the meeting or involve the disclosure of confidential information, (b) the answer has already been 
given on a website in the form of an answer to a question, or (c) it is undesirable in the interests of the Company or the good order of the meeting that the question be answered.

(viii)  Members have the right, under section 338 of the Companies Act 2006, to require the Company to give its members notice of a resolution which the shareholders wish to be moved at an 
annual general meeting of the Company. Additionally, members have the right under section 338A of the Companies Act 2006 to require the Company to include a matter (other than a 
proposed resolution) in the business to be dealt with at the annual general meeting. The Company is required to give such notice of a resolution or include such matter once it has received 
requests from members representing at least 5% of the total voting rights of all the members who have a right to vote at the annual general meeting or from at least 100 members with the 
same right to vote who hold shares in the Company on which there has been paid up an average sum per member of at least £100. This request must be received by the Company not later 
than six weeks before the annual general meeting or, if later, the time at which notice is given of the annual general meeting. In the case of a request relating to section 338A of the Companies 
Act 2006, the request must be accompanied by a statement setting out the grounds for the request.

(ix)  Except as provided above, members who wish to communicate with the Company in relation to the AGM should do so in writing either to the Group Company Secretary at the registered 

office address or to the Company’s registrar, Capita Registrars Limited, The Registry, 34 Beckenham Road, Beckenham, Kent BR3 4TU. No other methods of communication will be 
accepted. In particular you may not use any electronic address provided either in this notice of meeting or in any related documents to communicate with the Company for any purposes 
other than those expressly stated.

(x)  There will be available for inspection during the AGM and for at least 15 minutes before it begins, the directors’ appointment letters and service contracts.

(xi) A copy of this notice and the other information required by section 311A of the Companies Act 2006 can be found at www.bellway.co.uk.

(xii) As at the date of this notice there are 120,848,354 ordinary shares in issue and the total voting rights of the Company are therefore 120,848,354.

By order of the Board

G Kevin Wrightson

Group Company Secretary

Registered Office
Bellway p.l.c. 
Seaton Burn House 
Dudley Lane 
Seaton Burn 
Newcastle upon Tyne NE13 6BE

Registered in England and Wales
No. 1372603

17 October 2011

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

Other Information
Glossary

85

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Affordable Housing
Social rented and intermediate housing provided to specified eligible households whose needs are not met by the market, at a cost low enough 
for them to afford, determined with regard to local incomes and local house prices.

Average selling price
Calculated by dividing the total price of homes sold by the number of homes sold.

Brownfield sites
Land which has been previously used for other purposes.

Cancellation rate
The rate at which customers withdraw from a house purchase after paying the reservation fee, but before contracts are exchanged, usually due to 
difficulties in obtaining mortgage finance. Reservation fees are refunded in line with the Consumer Code for Home Builders.

Code for Sustainable Homes
A national standard for sustainable design and construction of new homes. The Code measures the “whole home” as a complete package, assessing 
its sustainability against nine categories: energy/CO2, water, materials, surface water run-off, waste, pollution, health and well-being, management and 
ecology. Level 3 applies to newly-constructed Affordable Housing subject to Homes and Communities Agency (“HCA”) grant policy and all homes 
built on HCA land from 1 April 2008. Level 3 differs from Level 4 primarily in respect of the energy/CO2 levels Level 3 seeks a 25% reduction in CO2 
emissions compared with 2006 Building Regulations requirements whereas Level 4 requires a 44% reduction.

Considerate Constructors Scheme
A national initiative by the construction industry, where companies and sites voluntarily register and agree to be monitored against, a Code 
of Considerate Practice, with a view to promoting best practice beyond statutory requirements.

Consumer Code for Home Builders
A voluntary code governing customer service and satisfaction, created by the NHBC in conjunction with MD Insurance Service Limited.

CSCS cards
The CSCS card denotes achievement of a Construction Skills Certificate, demonstrating occupational competence in the construction industry.

EcoHomes
An environmental rating scheme for UK homes.

HBF
Home Builders Federation.

Home Zones
Residential streets in which the road space is shared between drivers of motor vehicles and other road users, with the wider needs of residents 
(including children) who walk and cycle, in mind. The aim is to change the way that streets are used and to improve the quality of life in residential 
streets by making them for people, not just for traffic. For more information see www.homezones.org.uk.

Land bank
A supply of plots for potential development.

Lifetime Homes
Are ordinary homes incorporating 16 Design Criteria which add to the comfort and convenience of the home and support the changing needs 
of individuals and families at different stages of life.

NHBC
National House-Building Council.

Pipeline
Land bank awaiting planning permission.

Planning consent/permission
Usually granted by the local planning authority, this permission allows a plot of land to be built on, change its use or, for an existing building, 
be redeveloped or altered. Consent is either “outline”, when detailed plans are still to be approved, or “detailed” when detailed plans have 
been approved.

Rainwater harvesting
Rainwater harvesting is a system by which rainwater is collected from roofs, stored in underground tanks and then used in toilets and for garden 
irrigation. Rainwater harvesting can reduce household water consumption by up to 50%.

Registered Social Landlords (“RSLs”)
Government-funded not-for-profit organisations that provide affordable housing, such as housing associations, trusts and cooperatives. Working 
alongside local authorities, they provide homes for people meeting the affordable homes criteria. As well as developing land and building homes, 
RSLs perform a landlord function by maintaining properties and collecting rent.

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

86

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Other Information
Glossary (continued)

Safemark Certificate
NHBC’s Health & Safety Competence Assessment Scheme.

Section 106 planning agreements
These are legally-binding agreements or planning obligations entered into between a landowner and a local planning authority, under section 106 
of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. These agreements are a way of delivering or addressing matters that are necessary to make a 
development acceptable in planning terms. They are increasingly used to support the provision of services and infrastructure, such as highways, 
recreational facilities, education, health and affordable housing.

Secured by Design
Focuses on crime prevention at the design, layout and construction stages of homes and commercial premises and promotes the use of security 
standards for a wide range of applications and products. For more information see www.securedbydesign.com.

Social housing
Housing that is let at low rents and on a secure basis to people in housing need. It is generally provided by councils and not-for-profit organisations 
such as housing associations.

Sustainability
Environmental sustainability has been defined as meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet 
their needs.

Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (“SUDS”)
Designed to reduce the environmental effects of surface water run-off, which has been a problem with conventional drainage systems, particularly 
in new developments. SUDS replicate natural systems with minimal environmental effect, draining away dirty and surface water through collection, 
storage and cleaning.

Transport node
A point at which residents are able to access a public transport facility with ease.

Thin joint technology
Thin joint technology uses autoclaved aerated concrete blocks with 2mm–3mm mortar joints. The blocks are produced to a high degree of accuracy, 
and the thin layer mortar sets more rapidly than normal mortar, reducing the length of time before the wall becomes stable. The advantages of this 
system of construction are high build quality, greater productivity, improved thermal performance, air-tightness and waste reduction.

Waste Management Plan
Plans setting out how all resources, products and by-products will be managed and waste controlled at all stages of a construction project. 
Site Waste Management Plans are a legal requirement for all sites with an estimated construction cost of over £300,000.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

Other Information
Notes

87

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Bellway p.l.c.
Annual Report and Accounts 2011

88

Business Review

Governance

Accounts

Other Information

Other Information
Other Information
Notes (continued)

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

Welcome to this year’s report

Since its formation more than 50 years ago, 
Bellway has built over 100,000 homes. 
It is recognised throughout the industry 
for building quality homes.

accounts
45  Group Income Statement
45  Statements of Comprehensive 

Income

46 Statement of Changes in Equity
48 Balance Sheets
49 Cash Flow Statements
50 Accounting Policies
55 Notes to the Accounts

other information
77  Five Year Record
78  Shareholder Information
82  Notice of Annual General 

Meeting
85  Glossary
IBC Principal Offices

Business review
  1 Financial Highlights
  2 Chairman’s Statement
  6 Chief Executive’s Operating 

Review

13 Corporate Responsibility  

Policy

14 2011 Corporate Social 

Responsibility Statement
16 Key Performance Indicators 

(Non-Financial)
19 Environmental Policy
20 Group Finance Director’s Review
24 Operating Risk Statement

Governance 
26 Board of Directors
27 Advisers
28 Report of the Directors
35 Report of the Board on 
Directors’ Remuneration
43  Statement of Directors’ 

Responsibilities in respect of the 
Annual Report and Accounts
44 Independent Auditors’ Report to 
the Members of Bellway p.l.c.

Front cover: Carillons, Wokingham, Berkshire.

Back cover: Church Meadow, East Huntspill, Somerset.

Bellway p.l.c.

Annual Report and Accounts 2011

Find your dream home on the move 
with our new app for iPhone and iPad 

Search through hundreds of properties 
nationwide by price, number of bedrooms, 
house type and more. Get direct access to a 
member of our sales team to request further 
information or answer any of your queries.

Bellway p.l.c.
Seaton Burn House, Dudley Lane, Seaton Burn, Newcastle upon Tyne NE13 6BE

Tel: (0191) 217 0717; Fax: (0191) 236 6230; DX 711760 Seaton Burn; Website: www.bellway.co.uk

Bellway Homes Limited

East Midlands
No. 3 Romulus Court
Meridian East
Meridian Business Park
Braunstone Town
Leicester LE19 1YG
Tel: (0116) 282 0400
Fax: (0116) 282 0401

Essex
Bellway House
1 Rainsford Road
Chelmsford
Essex CM1 2PZ
Tel: (01245) 259 989
Fax: (01245) 259 996
DX: 121935 Chelmsford 6

North East
Peel House
Main Street, Ponteland
Newcastle upon Tyne 
NE20 9NN
Tel: (01661) 820 200
Fax: (01661) 821 010
DX: 68924 Ponteland 2

North London
Bellway House
Bury Street, Ruislip
Middlesex HA4 7SD
Tel: (01895) 671 100
Fax: (01895) 671 111

North West
Bellway House
2 Alderman Road
Liverpool L24 9LR
Tel: (0151) 486 2900
Fax: (0151) 336 9393

Northern Home counties
Oak House
Woodlands Business Park
Breckland, Linford Wood
Milton Keynes MK14 6EY
Tel: (01908) 328 800
Fax: (01908) 328 801
DX: 729383 Milton Keynes 16

Scotland
Bothwell House
Hamilton Business Park
Caird Street
Hamilton ML3 0QA
Tel: (01698) 477 440
Fax: (01698) 477 441
DX: HA13 Hamilton

South East
Bellway House
London Road North
Merstham
Surrey RH1 3YU
Tel: (01737) 644 911
Fax: (01737) 646 319

Thames Gateway
Osprey House
Crayfields Business Park
New Mill Road
Orpington
Kent BR5 3QJ
Tel: (01689) 886 400
Fax: (01689) 886 410

Wales
Alexander House
Excelsior Road
Western Avenue
Cardiff CF14 3AT
Tel: (029) 2054 4700
Fax: (029) 2054 4701

Wessex
Bellway House
Embankment Way
Castleman Business Centre
Ringwood
Hampshire BH24 1EU
Tel: (01425) 477 666
Fax: (01425) 474 382
DX: 45710 Ringwood

West Midlands
Bellway House
Relay Point
Relay Drive, Tamworth
Staffordshire B77 5PA
Tel: (01827) 255 755
Fax: (01827) 255 766
DX: 717023 Tamworth

Yorkshire
2 Deighton Close
Wetherby
West Yorkshire LS22 7GZ
Tel: (01937) 583 533
Fax: (01937) 586 147
DX: 16815 Wetherby

Other Subsidiary

Bellway Housing Trust Limited
Seaton Burn House
Dudley Lane
Seaton Burn
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE13 6BE
Tel: (0191) 217 0717
Fax: (0191) 236 6230
DX: 711760 Seaton Burn

Designed and produced by radley Yeldar www.ry.com
Printed on paper sourced from sustainable sources, using vegetable-based inks.

Bellway p.l.c.
Seaton Burn House,  
Dudley Lane,  
Seaton Burn,  
Newcastle upon Tyne  
NE13 6BE

Tel: (0191) 217 0717 
Fax: (0191) 236 6230 
DX: 711760 Seaton Burn

www.bellway.co.uk

l
l

B
e
w
a
y
p

.
l
.
c
. 
A
n
n
u
a

l

R
e
p
o
r
t

a
n
d
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
2
0
1
1

aNNuaL rEporT 
aND accouNTS 2011