More annual reports from Burlington Stores:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of Burlington Stores:
Big LotsA N N U A L R E P O R T201901919199911919191919A N N U A L R E P O R T Burlington Stores, Inc., headquartered in New Jersey, is a nationally recognized off-price retailer with Fiscal 2019 revenues of $7.3 billion. The Company is a Fortune 500 company and its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “BURL.” The Company operated 727 stores as of the end of the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019 in 45 states and Puerto Rico, principally under the name Burlington Stores. The Company’s stores offer an extensive selection of in-season, fashion-focused merchandise at up to 60% off other retailers’ prices every day, including women’s ready-to-wear apparel, menswear, youth apparel, baby, beauty, footwear, accessories, home, toys and coats. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended February 1, 2020 OR ‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 001-36107 BURLINGTON STORES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 2006 Route 130 North Burlington, New Jersey (Address of Principal Executive Offices) 80-0895227 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 08016 (Zip Code) Title of each class (609) 387-7800 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share BURL Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None New York Stock Exchange Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ‘ No È Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes È No ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer È Non-Accelerated filer ‘ ‘ Accelerated filer Smaller reporting company ‘ Emerging growth company ‘ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ‘ No È The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on August 2, 2019, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $11,637,817,686. The aggregate market value was computed by reference to the closing price of the common stock on such date. As of February 28, 2020, there were 65,892,508 shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding. Documents Incorporated By Reference: Certain provisions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed within 120 days of the close of the registrant’s 2019 fiscal year, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K to the extent described herein. [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] BURLINGTON STORES, INC. INDEX TO REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 2020 PART I. Item 1. Item 1A. Item 1B. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. PART II. Business Risk Factors Unresolved Staff Comments Properties Legal Proceedings Mine Safety Disclosures Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Selected Financial Data Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 6. Item 7. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Item 9. Controls and Procedures Item 9A. Other Information Item 9B. PART III. Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Executive Compensation Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Item 13. Item 14. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Principal Accountant Fees and Services PART IV. Item 15. Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules Form 10-K Summary SIGNATURES PAGE 1 6 22 23 23 23 24 27 28 47 49 96 96 99 99 99 99 99 99 100 111 112 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about us, the industry in which we operate and other matters, as well as management’s beliefs and assumptions. For example, when we use words such as “projects,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “will,” “opportunity,” “potential” or “may,” variations of such words or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes, we are making “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. These forward- looking statements may relate to such matters as our future actions, including expected store openings, ongoing strategic initiatives and the intended results of those initiatives, future performance or results of current and anticipated sales, expenses, interest rates, foreign exchange rates and results and the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings. Our forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results may differ materially from the events or results anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including each of the factors discussed in Item 1A, Risk Factors as well as risks and uncertainties discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual future events or results. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this Annual Report might not occur. In addition, as a result of these and other factors, our past financial performance should not be relied on as an indication of future performance. The cautionary statements referred to in this section also should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that may be issued by us or persons acting on our behalf. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. PART I Item 1. Business Overview We are a nationally recognized retailer of high-quality, branded merchandise at everyday low prices. We opened our first store in Burlington, New Jersey in 1972, selling primarily coats and outerwear. Since then, we have expanded our store base to 727 stores as of February 1, 2020, inclusive of an internet store, in 45 states and Puerto Rico. We have diversified our product categories by offering an extensive selection of in-season, fashion- focused merchandise at up to 60% off other retailers’ prices, including: women’s ready-to-wear apparel, menswear, youth apparel, baby, beauty, footwear, accessories, home, toys, gifts and coats. We sell a broad selection of merchandise acquired directly from nationally recognized manufacturers and other suppliers. As used in this Annual Report, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Burlington Stores, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries. We were organized in 2013 under the name Burlington Holdings, Inc. and currently exist as a Delaware corporation. Our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (BCFWC), was initially organized in 1972 as a New Jersey corporation, was reincorporated in 1983 in Delaware, and currently exists as a Florida corporation. We completed an initial public offering of our common stock in October 2013. Fiscal Year End We define our fiscal year as the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31. This is an annual report for the 52-week fiscal year ended February 1, 2020 (Fiscal 2019). The fiscal years ended February 2, 2019 (Fiscal 2018) and February 3, 2018 (Fiscal 2017) consisted of 52 weeks and 53 weeks, respectively. 1 Our Stores Over 99% of our net sales are derived from stores we operate as Burlington Stores. We believe that our customers are attracted to our stores principally by the availability of a large assortment of first-quality, current, brand-name merchandise at everyday low prices. Burlington Stores offer customers a complete line of merchandise, including: women’s ready-to-wear apparel, accessories, footwear, menswear, youth apparel, baby, home, coats, beauty, toys and gifts. Our broad selection provides a wide range of apparel, accessories and furnishings for all ages. We purchase both pre-season and in-season merchandise, allowing us to respond timely to changing market conditions and consumer fashion preferences. Furthermore, we believe Burlington Stores’ substantial selection of staple, destination products attracts customers from beyond our local trade areas. We believe these products drive incremental store traffic and differentiate us from our competitors. We believe the breadth of our selection and our ability to successfully operate in stores of varying square footage represents a competitive advantage. We believe that, as we continue to reduce our comparable store inventory, we will be able to reduce the square footage of our stores while continuing to maintain our broad assortment. As a result, we believe major landlords seek us as a tenant because the appeal of our merchandise profile attracts a desired customer base. Our store base is geographically diversified with stores located in 45 states and Puerto Rico as set forth below: State Number of Stores State Number of Stores State Number of Stores AK AL AR AZ CA CO CT DE FL GA IA ID IL IN KS KY 2 6 6 13 82 10 12 3 56 23 3 2 37 14 5 6 LA MA MD ME MI MN MO MS NC ND NE NH NJ NM NV 7 17 18 2 18 9 9 3 17 1 4 4 37 3 9 NY OH OK OR PA PR RI SC SD TN TX UT VA WA WI 47 28 7 4 34 12 5 10 1 9 81 8 20 12 10 Our internet store is excluded from the above table. Store Expansion and Real Estate Strategy We continue to explore expansion opportunities both within our current market areas and in other regions. We believe that our ability to find satisfactory locations for our stores is essential for the continued growth of our business. The opening of stores generally is contingent upon a number of factors, including the availability of desirable locations with suitable structures and the negotiation of acceptable lease terms. We have a proven track record of new store expansion. Our store base has grown from 13 stores in 1980 to 727 stores, inclusive of an internet store, as of February 1, 2020. If we identify appropriate locations, we believe 2 that we will be able to execute our growth strategy without significantly impacting our current stores. We have identified numerous market opportunities that we believe will allow us to operate at least 1,000 stores over the long-term. The table below shows our store openings and closings each of the last three fiscal years. Stores (beginning of period) Stores opened(a)(b) Stores closed(a) Stores (end of period) Fiscal 2019 Fiscal 2018 Fiscal 2017 675 60 (8) 727 629 56 (10) 675 592 43 (6) 629 (a) Exclusive of relocations. (b) Stores opened during Fiscal 2019 had an average size of 42,000 square feet. Distribution and Warehousing We have four distribution centers that shipped approximately 98% of merchandise units to our stores in Fiscal 2019. The remaining 2% of merchandise units are drop shipped by our vendors directly to our stores. Our two east coast distribution centers are located in Edgewater Park, New Jersey and Burlington, New Jersey. Our two west coast distribution centers are located in San Bernardino, California and Redlands, California. These four distribution centers occupy an aggregate of 2,884,000 square feet, and each includes processing, shipping and storage capabilities. In addition, we entered into a lease for an additional distribution center in Riverside, California occupying approximately 900,000 square feet, which is expected to become operational during Fiscal 2020. In addition to the distribution centers that we operate, we have arrangements with third parties for the use of pool point facilities, which we believe streamline and optimize our distribution network We also operate three warehousing facilities to support our distribution centers. The east coast has two supporting warehouses in Burlington, New Jersey. The west coast has one supporting warehouse in Redlands, California. These three warehousing facilities occupy an aggregate of 1,456,000 square feet and primarily serve as storage facilities. In addition, as of February 1, 2020, we occupied approximately 180,000 square feet of space at a third-party logistics center in Plainfield, Indiana to support our e-commerce business. Customer Service We are committed to providing our customers with an enjoyable shopping experience in stores that are clean, neat and easy to shop. In training our employees, our goal is to emphasize knowledgeable, friendly customer service and a sense of professional pride. We offer our customers special services in most of our stores, such as layaway, to enhance the convenience of their shopping experience. We have empowered our store teams to provide an outstanding customer experience for every customer in every store, every day. We have streamlined processes and will continue to strive to create opportunities for fast and friendly customer interactions. Our goal for our stores is to reflect clean, organized merchandise presentations that highlight the brands, value and diversity of selection within our assortments. Our Off-Price Sourcing and Merchandising Model Our “open to buy” off-price model enables us to provide our customers with products that are nationally branded, fashionable, high quality and priced right. We have an experienced team of General Merchandise Managers, Divisional Merchandise Managers and buyers focused on improving comparable store inventory turnover, inventory age and freshness of merchandise. 3 We continue to improve the quality of our brand portfolio, driven by the growth of our merchandising team, excellent product availability, and a vendor community increasingly committed to grow with Burlington. We carry many different brands, none of which accounted for more than 2% of our net purchases during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 or Fiscal 2017. We have no long-term purchase commitments or arrangements with any of our suppliers, and believe that we are not dependent on any one supplier. We continue to have good working relationships with our suppliers. We have designed our merchant organization so that buyers focus primarily on buying, planners focus primarily on planning, and information systems help inform data-driven decisions for both groups. Buyers are in the market each week and focus on purchasing great products for great value. We seek to purchase a majority of our merchandise in-season. Buyers spend time interacting face-to-face with new and existing vendors and on continuously evaluating trends in the market to which we believe our customers would respond positively. Our buyers use a merchant scorecard that rates products across four key attributes—fashion, quality, brand and price—to help formalize a framework for buying decisions. Our merchandising model allows us to provide our customers with a wide breadth of product categories. Sales percentage by major product category is as follows: Category Fiscal 2019(a) Fiscal 2018(a) Fiscal 2017(a) Women’s ready-to-wear apparel Accessories and footwear Menswear Youth apparel/baby Home Coats (a) Percentages may not foot due to rounding. E-Commerce 22% 22% 20% 16% 15% 5% 23% 22% 20% 16% 15% 5% 23% 22% 20% 16% 14% 5% We employ an online strategy focused on increasing awareness of the breadth of our merchandise selection, great brands and values, as well as driving traffic to our stores. We execute our strategy through our website and through social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter. We are in the process of winding down the sales of merchandise (other than gift cards) from our website. The website will transition from an e-commerce platform to an engaging online site filled with inspirational content, showcasing the great finds found in our stores at a great value. Merchandise sold directly from our website represented approximately 0.5% of our total sales in Fiscal 2019. Customer Demographic Our core customer is the 25-49 year old woman, with an average annual household income of $25,000-$100,000. The core customer is educated, resides in mid- to large-sized metropolitan areas and is a brand conscious fashion enthusiast. This customer shops for herself, her family, and her home. We appeal to value seeking and fashion conscious customers who are price-driven but enjoy the style and fit of high-quality, branded merchandise. Marketing and Advertising We use a variety of broad-based and targeted marketing strategies to efficiently deliver the right message to the targeted audience at the right time. These strategies include national television, direct mail, email, digital and social marketing, local radio and out-of-home communications. Our broad television broadcast communication and reach is balanced with relevant customer contacts to increase frequency of store visits. 4 Private Label Credit Card During Fiscal 2019, we launched a private label credit card program. The program has been rolled out to all of our stores. We believe this program has the potential to deepen customer loyalty, inform customer contact strategies, and drive increases in trip frequency and transaction size. Management Information Systems and Processes We utilize a combination of industry-standard third party and internally developed information technology and system solutions to support our business functions. We continually evaluate and implement business system technologies and solutions that enhance the consistency of our execution and improve the scalability of business system functions. We utilize standard methodologies to evaluate new initiatives across our entire organization and make data-driven decisions that support our growth and cost management initiatives. Competition The U.S. retail apparel and home furnishings markets are highly fragmented and competitive. We compete on the basis of a combination of factors, including, among others, price, breadth, quality and style of merchandise offered, in-store experience, level of customer service, ability to identify and respond to new and emerging fashion trends, brand image and scalability. We compete for business with department stores, off-price retailers, specialty stores, online retailers, discount stores, wholesale clubs, and outlet stores, as well as with certain traditional, full-price retail chains that have developed off-price concepts. At various times throughout the year, traditional full-price department store chains and specialty shops offer brand-name merchandise at substantial markdowns, which can result in prices approximating those offered by us at our stores. Seasonality Our business, like that of most retailers, is subject to seasonal influences. In the second half of the year, which includes the back-to-school and holiday seasons, we generally realize a higher level of sales and net income. Weather is also a contributing factor to the sale of our clothing. Generally, our sales are higher if the weather is cold during the Fall and warm during the early Spring. Sales of cold weather clothing are increased by early cold weather during the Fall, while sales of warm weather clothing are improved by early warm weather conditions in the Spring. Although we have diversified our product offerings, we believe traffic to our stores is still driven, in part, by weather patterns. Trademarks We are the owner of certain registered and common law trademarks, service marks and tradenames (collectively referred to as the Marks) that we use in connection with our business. Our Marks include, but are not limited to, “Burlington Stores,” “BCF,” “Burlington,” “Burlington Coat Factory,” “Cohoes,” “Luxury Linens,” “MJM Designer Shoes,” “B” and “Baby Depot.” We consider these Marks and the accompanying name recognition to be valuable to our business. We believe that our rights to these properties are adequately protected. Our rights in these trademarks endure for as long as they are used. Employees As of February 1, 2020, we employed approximately 47,000 people, including part-time and seasonal employees. Our staffing requirements fluctuate during the year as a result of the seasonality of our business. We hire additional employees and increase the hours of part-time employees during seasonal peak selling periods. As of February 1, 2020, employees at one of our stores were subject to a collective bargaining agreement. Available Information We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. Therefore, we file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC maintains a 5 website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including us. You can access financial and other information about us in the Investor Relations page of our website at www.burlingtoninvestors.com. We make available through our website, free of charge, copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed with or furnished to the SEC under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing or furnishing such material to the SEC. Investors and others should note that we currently announce material information using SEC filings, press releases, public conference calls and webcasts. In the future, we will continue to use these channels to distribute material information about the Company, and may also utilize our website and/or various social media sites to communicate important information about the Company, key personnel, new brands and services, trends, new marketing campaigns, corporate initiatives and other matters. Information that we post on our website or on social media channels could be deemed material; therefore, we encourage investors, the media, our customers, business partners and others interested in the Company to review the information posted on our website, as well as the following social media channels: Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/BurlingtonStores) and Twitter (https://twitter.com/burlington). Any updates to the list of social media channels we may use to communicate material information will be posted on the Investor Relations page of our website at www.burlingtoninvestors.com. The information contained on, or accessible through, our website and these social media channels is not part of this Annual Report and is therefore not incorporated by reference. The references to our website and these social media channels are intended to be inactive textual references only. Item 1A. Risk Factors Set forth below are certain important risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows and cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements made by us. Although we believe that we have identified and discussed below the key risk factors affecting our business, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be significant that may adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report. If we are not successful in managing these risks and uncertainties, they could have a negative impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Risks Related to Our Business and Our Substantial Indebtedness A downturn in general economic conditions or consumer spending could adversely affect our business. Consumer spending habits, including spending for the merchandise that we sell, are affected by, among other things, prevailing global economic conditions, inflation, levels of employment, salaries and wage rates, prevailing interest rates, housing costs, energy costs, commodities pricing, income tax rates and policies, consumer confidence and consumer perception of economic conditions. In addition, consumer purchasing patterns may be influenced by consumers’ disposable income, credit availability and debt levels. Slowdown in the U.S. economy, an uncertain global economic outlook or a credit crisis could adversely affect consumer spending habits, resulting in lower net sales and profits than expected on a quarterly or annual basis. Consumer confidence is also affected by the domestic and international political situation. Our financial condition and operations could be impacted by changes in government regulations in areas, including taxes and healthcare. The outbreak or escalation of war, or the occurrence of terrorist acts or other hostilities in or affecting the U.S. could lead to a decrease in spending by consumers. In addition, natural disasters, industrial accidents, acts of war, and 6 public health issues such as pandemics or epidemics could have the effect of disrupting supplies and raising prices globally which, in turn, may have adverse effects on the world and U.S. economies and lead to a downturn in consumer confidence and spending. Concerns are rapidly growing about the outbreak of a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) that was first reported in China in December 2019. Since then, the virus has spread to over 100 countries, including the U.S. The number of people ill with or dying of a viral pneumonia caused by the virus is rising rapidly, despite quarantines of millions of people and other measures to try to stop it or slow its spread. As the pandemic continues to grow, consumer fear about becoming ill with the virus and recommendations and/or mandates from federal, state and local authorities to avoid large gatherings of people or self-quarantine may continue to increase, which may adversely affect traffic to our stores. Any significant reduction in customer visits to, and spending at, our stores caused by COVID-19 would result in a loss of sales and profits and other material adverse effects. The extent of the impact of COVID-19 on our business and financial results will depend largely on future developments, including the duration and spread of the outbreak within the U.S. and the related impact on consumer confidence and spending, all of which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. We face increased competition from other retailers that could adversely affect our business. The retail sector is highly competitive, and retailers are constantly adjusting their business models, promotional activities and pricing strategies in response to changing conditions. We compete on the basis of a combination of factors, including among others, price, breadth, quality and style of merchandise offered, in-store experience, level of customer service, ability to identify and respond to new and emerging fashion trends, brand image and scalability. We compete with a wide variety of retailers for customers, vendors, suitable store locations and personnel. In order to increase traffic and drive consumer spending, competitors, including department stores, mass merchants and specialty apparel stores, have been offering brand-name merchandise at substantial markdowns. Continuation of this trend, or the possible effect on consumer buying patterns that improving economic conditions could have, may cause consumer demand to shift from off-price retailers to other retail categories, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Certain traditional, full-price retail chains have developed off-price concepts, which may directly compete with our business. Our competitors, including such retail chains, may seek to emulate facets of our business strategy, which could result in a reduction of any competitive advantage or special appeal that we might possess. In addition, most of our products are sold to us on a non-exclusive basis. As a result, our current and future competitors may be able to duplicate or improve on some or all of our product offerings that we believe are important in differentiating our stores. If our competitors were to duplicate or improve on some or all of our in-store experience or product offerings, obtaining the products we sell may become increasingly difficult, competition for customers may increase, and our competitive position and our business could suffer. We may not be able to sustain our growth plans or successfully implement our long-range strategic goals. Our growth largely depends on our ability to successfully open and operate new stores, as well as to expand our distribution capabilities in order to support that growth. We intend to open 54 net new stores in 2020, while refreshing, remodeling or relocating a portion of our existing store base annually. The success of these strategies is dependent upon, among other things, the current retail environment, the identification of suitable markets and the availability of real estate that meets our criteria for traffic, square footage, co-tenancies, lease economics, demographics, and other factors, the negotiation of acceptable lease terms, construction costs, the availability of financing, the hiring, training and retention of competent sales personnel, and the effective management of inventory to meet the needs of new and existing stores on a timely basis. Notably, as we continue to evolve our off-price model, we plan on more effectively chasing the sales trend, making greater investments in our merchandising capabilities, operating with leaner inventories, improving 7 operational flexibility, and challenging expenses, among other things. Executing these initiatives while also maintaining the current pace of our expansion may place increased demands on our operational, managerial and administrative resources. These initiatives may require us to increase the number of merchants and other associates we employ, modify how we manage our liquidity and inventory, as well as to monitor and upgrade our management information and other systems and our distribution infrastructure. We may not be able to successfully execute our growth and other strategies on a timely basis or at all. If we fail to implement these strategies successfully, if we cannot keep up with the pace required for execution, or if these strategies do not yield the desired outcomes, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected. Our net sales, operating income and inventory levels fluctuate on a seasonal basis, and decreases in sales or margins during our peak seasons could have a disproportionate effect on our overall financial condition and results of operations. Our net sales and operating income fluctuate seasonally, with a higher level of our operating income typically realized during the second half of the year. Any decrease in sales or margins during this period could have a disproportionate effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Seasonal fluctuations also affect our inventory levels. We must carry a significant amount of inventory, especially before the holiday season selling period. If we are not successful in selling our inventory, we may have to write down our inventory or sell it at significantly reduced prices or we may not be able to sell such inventory at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. A reduction in traffic to, or the closing of, the other destination retailers in the shopping areas where our stores are located could significantly reduce our sales and leave us with excess inventory, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, profitability and cash flows. Many of our stores are strategically located in off-mall shopping areas known as “power centers.” Power centers typically contain three to five big-box anchor stores along with a variety of smaller specialty tenants. Due to many of our stores being located in such shopping areas, our sales are derived, in part, from the volume of traffic generated by the other destination retailers and the anchor stores in power centers where our stores are located. Customer traffic to these shopping areas may be adversely affected by the closing of such destination retailers or anchor stores, or by a reduction in traffic to such stores resulting from a regional or global economic downturn, a general downturn in the local area where our store is located, or a decline in the desirability of the shopping environment of a particular power center. Such a reduction in customer traffic would reduce our sales and leave us with excess inventory, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, profitability and cash flows. We may respond by increasing markdowns or transferring product to other stores to reduce excess inventory, which would further decrease our gross profits and net income. Failure to execute our opportunistic buying and inventory management process could adversely affect our business. We purchase the majority of our inventory opportunistically, with our buyers purchasing close to need. Establishing the “treasure hunt” nature of the off-price buying experience to drive traffic to our stores requires us to offer changing assortments of merchandise in our stores. While opportunistic purchasing provides our buyers the ability to buy at desirable times and prices, in the quantities we need and into market trends, it places considerable discretion with our buyers, which subjects us to risks related to the pricing, quantity, nature and timing of inventory flowing to our stores. If we are unable to provide frequent replenishment of fresh, high quality, attractively priced merchandise in our stores, it could adversely affect traffic to our stores as well as our sales and margins. We base our purchases of inventory, in part, on our sales forecasts. If our sales forecasts do not match customer demand, we may experience higher inventory levels and need to markdown excess or slow- moving inventory, leading to decreased profit margins, or we may have insufficient inventory to meet customer 8 demand, leading to lost sales, either of which could adversely affect our financial performance. We need to purchase inventory sufficiently below conventional retail to maintain our pricing differential to regular department and specialty store prices, and to attract customers and sustain our margins, which we may not achieve at various times and which could adversely affect our results. In order to better serve our customers and maximize sales, we must properly execute our inventory management strategies by appropriately allocating merchandise among our stores, timely and efficiently distributing inventory to such locations, maintaining an appropriate mix and level of inventory in such locations, appropriately changing the allocation of floor space of stores among product categories to respond to customer demand, and effectively managing pricing and markdowns, and there is no assurance we will be able to do so. In addition, as we execute inventory localization initiatives, there could be disruptions in inventory flow and placement. Failure to effectively execute our opportunistic inventory buying and inventory management strategies could adversely affect our performance and our reputation. In addition to our own execution, we may need to react to factors affecting inventory flow that are outside our control, such as adverse weather, natural disasters, epidemics or pandemics (including COVID-19) or other changes in conditions affecting our vendors and others in our supply chain, such as political instability, labor issues (including strikes or threats of strikes and scarcity of labor) or increasing cost of regulations. If we are not able to adjust appropriately to such factors, our inventory management may be affected, which could impact our performance and our reputation. Failure to identify customer trends and preferences to meet customer demand could negatively impact our performance and reputation. Because our success depends on our ability to meet customer demand, we work to follow customer trends and preferences on an ongoing basis and to buy inventory in response to those trends and preferences. However, identifying consumer trends and preferences in the diverse product lines and many markets in which we do business and successfully meeting customer demand across those lines and for those markets on a timely basis is challenging. Although our flexible business model allows us to buy close to need and in response to consumer preferences and trends, and to expand and contract merchandise categories in response to consumers’ changing tastes, we may not do so successfully, which could adversely affect our sales and the markdowns required to move the resulting excess inventory will adversely affect our operating margins. Customers may also have expectations about how they shop in stores, or more generally engage with businesses across different channels or media (through internet-based and other digital or mobile channels or particular forms of social media), which may vary across demographics and may evolve rapidly. Customers are increasingly using technology and mobile devices to rapidly compare products and prices and to purchase products. Failure to effectively meet these changing expectations and demands, including any failure of the planned transformation of our e-commerce platform, may adversely impact our reputation and our financial results. Many stakeholders, including investors, customers, consumers and others, have increasingly focused on sustainability matters. If we do not (or are perceived not to) act responsibly with respect to any sustainability matters, our reputation could be harmed, which could negatively impact our business and results of operations. If we are unable to renew or replace our store leases or enter into leases for new stores on favorable terms, if our current leases are terminated prior to the expiration of their stated term and we cannot find suitable alternate locations, or if we cannot optimize our existing stores, our growth strategy and profitability could be negatively impacted. We lease substantially all of our store locations. Most of our current leases expire at various dates after ten-year terms, the majority of which are subject to our option to renew such leases for several additional five-year periods. While we have the right to terminate some of our leases under specified conditions, including by making 9 specified payments, we may not be able to terminate a particular lease if or when we would like to close a particular store. If we decide to close stores, we are generally required to continue to perform obligations under the applicable leases, which generally include, among other things, paying rent and operating expenses for the balance of the lease term, or paying to exercise rights to terminate, and performing any of these obligations may be expensive. When we assign leases or sublease space to third parties, we may remain liable on the lease obligations, which could lead to significant expense if the assignee or sublessee does not perform. In addition, when the lease terms for the stores in our ongoing operations expire, our ability to renew such expiring leases on commercially acceptable terms or, if such leases cannot be renewed, our ability to lease a suitable alternative location, and our ability to enter into leases for new stores on favorable terms will each depend on many factors, some of which may not be within our control, such as conditions in the local real estate market, competition for desirable properties and our relationships with current and prospective lessors. As we renew and replace our store leases, we also strive to optimize the size of our existing stores to ensure maximum space utilization, which frequently means adjusting operations to accommodate smaller space through alternative floor plans and inventory turn optimization. In addition, to the extent that our new store openings are in existing markets, we may experience reduced net sales volumes in existing stores in those markets. We expect to fund some of our expansion through cash flow from operations, lease incentives from our lessors, and, if necessary, by borrowings under our line of credit. If we experience a decline in performance or lease payment allowances from our lessors become unavailable, we may slow or discontinue store openings, relocations, refreshes and/or remodels. If we are unable to effectively manage our existing portfolio of real estate leases, renew existing leases or lease suitable alternative locations, enter into leases for new stores on favorable terms, or optimize our existing stores, our growth and profitability may be negatively impacted. Extreme and/or unseasonable weather conditions, or catastrophic events could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Extreme weather conditions in the areas in which our stores or distribution centers are located – especially in areas with a high concentration of our stores – could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, heavy snowfall or other extreme weather conditions over a prolonged period might make it difficult for our customers or employees to travel to our stores. In addition, natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornados, floods, earthquakes, and other extreme weather or climate conditions, or a combination of these or other factors, could severely damage or destroy one or more of our stores or distribution facilities located in the affected areas, or disrupt our computer systems, thereby disrupting our business operations. Any of these events or circumstances also could disrupt the operations of one or more of our vendors. Day-to-day operations, particularly our ability to receive products from our vendors or transport products to our stores, could be adversely affected, or we could be required to close stores. Finally, if the COVID-19 pandemic continues to grow within the U.S., we may decide or be required to temporarily close a significant number of our stores in various affected areas, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Our business is also susceptible to unseasonable weather conditions. For example, extended periods of unseasonably warm temperatures during the Fall or Winter seasons or cool weather during the Spring or Summer seasons could render a portion of our inventory incompatible with those unseasonable conditions, particularly in light of our historical product mix. These prolonged unseasonable weather conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, because higher net sales historically have occurred during the second half of the year, unseasonably warm weather during these months could have a disproportionately large effect on our business and materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. 10 Since we do not have long-term contracts with our vendors, if we are unable to purchase attractive brand name merchandise in sufficient quantities at competitive prices, we may be unable to offer an appealing merchandise mix and our sales may be harmed. Our ability to purchase merchandise opportunistically from third party vendors depends upon the continuous, sufficient availability of high quality merchandise that we can acquire at prices sufficiently below those paid by conventional retailers in order to achieve the value proposition we strive to provide to our customers. Some of our key vendors may limit the number of retail channels they use to sell their merchandise, which may result in intense competition among retailers to obtain and sell these goods. In addition, most of the brands of our top vendors are sold by competing retailers and some of our top vendors also have their own dedicated retail stores. Moreover, we typically buy products from our vendors on a purchase order basis. We have no long-term purchase contracts with any of our vendors and, therefore, have no contractual assurances of continued supply, pricing or access to products, and any vendor could change the terms upon which they sell to us or discontinue selling to us at any time. Finally, if our vendors are better able to manage their inventory levels and reduce the amount of their excess inventory, the amount of high quality merchandise available to us could be materially reduced. If our relationships with our vendors are disrupted, we may not be able to acquire the merchandise we require in sufficient quantities or on terms acceptable to us. Any inability to acquire high quality merchandise would have a negative effect on our business and operating results because we would be missing products from our merchandise mix unless and until alternative supply arrangements were made, resulting in deferred or lost sales. In addition, events that adversely affect our vendors could impair our ability to obtain desired merchandise in sufficient quantities. Such events include difficulties or problems associated with our vendors’ businesses, finances, labor, importation of products, costs, production, insurance and reputation. The loss of executives or other key personnel or our failure to facilitate senior management smooth transitions may disrupt our business and adversely affect our financial results. We depend on the contributions of key personnel in various functions for our continued success. These executives and other key personnel may be hired by our competitors, some of which have considerably more financial resources than we do. The loss of key personnel, or the inability to hire, train, motivate and retain qualified employees, or changes to our organizational structure, operating results, or business model that adversely affect morale or retention, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Effective succession planning is also a key factor for our success. In Fiscal 2019, we experienced significant transitions among the Company’s senior management with the appointment of a new Chief Executive Officer and a new Chief Financial Officer. Our failure to enable the effective transfer of knowledge and facilitate smooth transitions with regard to these key personnel and others could adversely affect our strategic planning and execution and negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we fail to enable the effective transfer of knowledge and facilitate smooth transitions for key personnel, the operating results and future growth for our business could be adversely affected, and the morale and productivity of the workforce could be disrupted. Our failure to attract, train and retain quality employees and temporary personnel in appropriate numbers could adversely affect our business. Our performance depends on recruiting, developing, training and retaining quality sales, systems, distribution center and other employees in large numbers as well as experienced buying and management personnel, and we invest significant resources in training and motivating them to maintain a high level of job satisfaction. Many of our store employees are in entry level or part-time positions with historically high rates of turnover, which can lead to increased training and retention costs, particularly if employment opportunities increase. Availability and skill of employees may differ across markets in which we do business and in new markets we enter, and we need to manage our labor needs effectively. 11 In addition, because of the distinctive nature of our off-price model, we must provide significant internal training and development for key employees across the company, including within our buying organization. Similar to other retailers, we face challenges in securing and retaining sufficient talent in management and other key areas for many reasons, including competition in the retail industry generally and for talent in various geographic markets. If we do not continue to attract qualified individuals, train them in our business model, support their development and retain them, our performance could be adversely affected or our growth could be limited. We are also dependent upon temporary personnel to adequately staff our stores and distribution facilities, with heightened dependence during busy periods such as the holiday season and when multiple new stores are opening. Although we strive to secure long-term contracts on favorable terms with our service providers and other vendors, we may not be able to avoid unexpected operating cost increases in the future, such as those associated with minimum wage increases or enhanced health care requirements. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will receive adequate assistance from our temporary personnel, or that there will be sufficient sources of suitable temporary personnel to meet our demand. Any such failure to meet our staffing needs or any material increases in associate turnover rates could have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations. Further, any negative publicity regarding the agencies from which we source temporary personnel, such as in connection with immigration issues or employment practices, could damage our reputation, disrupt our ability to obtain needed labor or result in financial harm to our business. Labor costs, including healthcare costs, and other challenges from our large workforce may adversely affect our results and profitability. We have a large workforce, and our ability to meet our labor needs while controlling costs, including costs of providing health, retirement and other associate benefits, is subject to various factors such as unemployment levels; prevailing wage rates and minimum wage requirements; participant benefit levels; economic conditions; interest rate changes; health and other insurance costs; and the regulatory environment, including health care legislation, and with respect to governmental labor and employment and associate benefits programs and requirements. When wage rates or benefit levels increase in the market or the unemployment rate is otherwise low, increasing our wages or benefits to compete for employees may cause our earnings to decrease, while failing to increase our wages or benefits competitively or reducing our wages or benefits could result in a decline in our ability to attract or retain employees or in the quality of our workforce, causing our customer service or performance to suffer, which could negatively impact our results. Parties with whom we do business may be subject to insolvency risks or may otherwise become unable or unwilling to perform their obligations to us. We are party to contracts, transactions and business relationships with various third parties, including vendors, suppliers, service providers and lenders, pursuant to which such third parties have performance, payment and other obligations to us. In some cases, we depend upon such third parties to provide essential leaseholds, products, services or other benefits, including with respect to store and distribution center locations, merchandise, advertising, software development and support, logistics, other agreements for goods and services in order to operate our business in the ordinary course, extensions of credit, hedging instruments and other vital matters. Economic, industry and market conditions could result in increased risks to us associated with the potential financial distress of such third parties. If any of the third parties with which we do business become subject to bankruptcy, receivership or similar insolvency proceedings, our rights and benefits in relation to our contracts, transactions and business relationships with such third parties could be terminated, modified in a manner adverse to us, or otherwise impaired. We cannot make any assurances that we would be able to arrange for alternate or replacement contracts, transactions or business relationships on terms as favorable as our existing contracts, transactions or business relationships, if at all. Any inability on our part to do so could negatively affect our cash flows, financial condition and results of operations. 12 Many of our vendors produce merchandise overseas, and our business is exposed to the risk of foreign and domestic operations and international tax policies and trade relations. We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. As a result, we are dependent upon the timely receipt of quality merchandise from vendors, many of which produce merchandise overseas. Factors which affect overseas production could affect our vendors and, in turn, our ability to obtain inventory and the price levels at which they may be obtained. Factors that cause an increase in merchandise costs or a decrease in supply could lead to generally lower sales and gross margins in the retail industry. Such factors include: • • • • • • • • • • political or labor instability in countries where vendors are located or at foreign ports which could result in lengthy shipment delays, which, if timed ahead of the Fall and Winter peak selling periods, could materially and adversely affect our ability to stock inventory on a timely basis; disruptions in the operations of domestic ports through which we import our merchandise, including labor disputes involving work slowdowns, lockouts or strikes, which could require us and/or our vendors to ship merchandise to alternative ports in the United States or through the use of more expensive means, and shipping to alternative ports in the United States could result in increased lead times and transportation costs; disruptions at ports through which we import our goods could also result in unanticipated inventory shortages; political or military conflict, which could cause a delay in the transportation of our products to us and an increase in transportation costs; heightened terrorism security concerns, which could subject imported goods to additional, more frequent or more thorough inspections, leading to delays in deliveries or impoundment of goods for extended periods; disease epidemics, pandemics (including COVID-19), outbreaks and other health-related concerns, which could result in closed factories, reduced workforces, scarcity of raw materials and scrutiny or embargoing of goods produced in infected areas; natural disasters and industrial accidents, which could have the effect of curtailing production and disrupting supplies; increases in labor and production costs in goods-producing countries, which would result in an increase in our inventory costs; the migration and development of manufacturers, which can affect where our products are or will be produced; fluctuation in our vendors’ local currency against the dollar, which may increase our cost of goods sold; and changes in import duties, taxes, charges, quotas, loss of “most favored nation” trading status with the United States for a particular foreign country and trade restrictions (including the United States imposing antidumping or countervailing duty orders, safeguards, remedies or compensation and retaliation due to illegal foreign trade practices). Any of the foregoing factors, or a combination thereof, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Over the past couple years, uncertainty has increased with respect to tax and trade policies, tariffs and government regulations affecting trade between the U.S. and other countries. Although we source the majority of our merchandise from third party vendors located in the U.S., the production of that merchandise occurs primarily overseas. As a result, we continue to evaluate the impact of the effective and any additional proposed tariffs on our supply chain, costs, sales and profitability. Given the uncertainty regarding the scope and duration of the tariffs on Chinese goods, as well as the potential for additional trade actions by the U.S. or other countries, the impact on our operations and results is uncertain, and we can provide no assurance that any strategies we implement to mitigate the impact of such tariffs or other trade actions will be successful. 13 In addition, other major developments in tax policy or trade relations, such as the disallowance of tax deductions for imported merchandise or the imposition of additional unilateral tariffs on imported products could increase the cost of products purchased from suppliers in such countries or restrict the importation of products from such countries, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and liquidity. Any disruption to our distribution network, including the shutdown of one of our primary distribution centers or complications with any third-party vendors that support our network, or increases in the cost of their services, could cause disruptions in our business, a loss of sales and profits, increases in our expenses, and other material adverse effects. Most of the merchandise we purchase is shipped directly to our distribution centers, where it is prepared for shipment to the appropriate stores. The success of our stores depends on their timely receipt of merchandise, and a strong, efficient and flexible distribution network is critical to our ability to grow and to maintain a low-cost operating structure. A disruption within our distribution network, including the shutdown of or loss of significant capacity by one of our current primary distribution centers, could adversely affect our ability to deliver inventory in a timely manner and significantly disrupt our business. In addition, any failure to continue to add capacity to our existing distribution centers and build out planned additional distribution centers timely and cost effectively could adversely affect our business. In addition to the distribution centers that we operate, we have arrangements with third parties for the use of pool point facilities, which we believe streamline and optimize our distribution network. If complications arise with a pool point facility or its operator, or if any such facility is severely damaged or destroyed, it may cause delays in the delivery of our merchandise to our stores. We also may be affected by disruptions in the global transportation network such as port strikes, weather conditions, work stoppages or other labor unrest, which may also adversely affect our ability to deliver inventory on a timely basis. We also depend upon third-party carriers for shipment of merchandise; any interruption in service by these carriers for any reason could cause disruptions in our business, a loss of sales and profits, and other material adverse effects. Finally, if the COVID-19 pandemic continues to grow, our import supply chain could experience severe delays due to closed factories and/or reduction in processing capacity as a result of workers not being able to return back to work or other labor shortages, which could cause disruptions in our business, a loss of sales and profits, and other adverse effects. If we are unable to protect our information systems against service interruption, misappropriation of data, breaches of security, or other cyber-related attacks, our operations could be disrupted, we may suffer financial losses and our reputation may be damaged. We rely extensively on various information systems, including data centers, hardware, software and applications to manage many aspects of our business, including to process and record transactions in our stores, to enable effective communication systems, to plan and track inventory flow, to manage logistics and to generate performance and financial reports. In addition, some aspects of our business, like that of most retailers, involve the receipt, storage and transmission of customers’ personal information and consumer preferences, as well as confidential information about our employees, our vendors and our Company, some of which is entrusted to third-party service providers and vendors. We are dependent on the integrity, security and consistent operations of these systems and related back-up systems, software, tools (including encryption technology) and monitoring to provide security and oversight for processing, transmission, storage and the protection of such confidential information. Like most major corporations, however, we, our customers and our third-party services providers face an evolving, increasing threat landscape in which cybercriminals, among others, employ a complex array of techniques designed to access personal and other information, including, for example, the use of fraudulent or 14 stolen access credentials, malware, ransomware, phishing, denial of service and other types of attacks. Hardware, software or applications we develop or obtain from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that are not presently known and could unexpectedly compromise information security. In addition, our employees, contractors or third parties with which we do business or to which we outsource business operations may attempt to circumvent our security measures in order to misappropriate such information, and may purposefully or inadvertently cause a breach involving such information or become subject to various other cyber-crimes. Further, our computer systems and the third-party systems of our vendors are also subject to damage or interruption from a number of non-criminal causes, including power outages; computer and telecommunications failures; computer viruses; and design or usage errors by our employees or contractors. If we or third parties with which we do business were to fall victim to successful cyber-attacks or experience other cybersecurity incidents, including the loss of individually identifiable customer or other sensitive data, we may incur substantial costs and suffer other negative consequences, which may include: • • • • • • • remediation costs, such as liability for stolen assets or information, repairs of system damage or replacement of systems, and incentives to customers or business partners in an effort to maintain relationships after an attack; increased cybersecurity protection costs, which may include the costs to continuing to make organizational changes, deploy additional personnel and protection technologies, train employees, and engage third party consultants; lost revenues resulting from the unauthorized use of proprietary information or the failure to retain or attract customers following an attack; litigation and legal risks, including regulatory actions by state and federal governmental authorities; increased cybersecurity and other insurance premiums; reputational damage that adversely affects customer or investor confidence; and damage to our competitiveness, stock price, and long-term stockholder value. Despite advances in security hardware, software, and encryption technologies, the methods and tools used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems are constantly changing and evolving, and may be difficult to anticipate or detect for long periods of time, and there is no guarantee that the proactive measures we put in place will be adequate to safeguard against all data security breaches or misuses of data. Although we endeavor to protect consumer identity and payment information through the implementation and modification of security technologies, processes and procedures, including training programs for employees to raise awareness about phishing, malware and other cyber risks and certification of our major technology suppliers and any outsourced services through accepted security certification measures, we could experience increased costs associated with maintaining these protections as threats of cyber-attacks increase in sophistication and complexity. In addition, there are additional inherent risks associated with modifying or replacing systems, and with new or changed relationships, including accurately capturing and maintaining data, realizing the expected benefit of the change and managing the potential disruption of the operation of the systems as the changes are implemented. Potential issues associated with implementing technology initiatives and the time and resources required to optimize the benefits of new elements of our systems and infrastructure could reduce the efficiency of our operations in the short term. Compliance with increasingly rigorous privacy and data security regulations could be costly, affect or limit our business opportunities and how we collect and/or use data, and potentially subject us to fines and lawsuits. As described above, the protection of customer, employee, vendor and Company data is critical to our business. As the regulatory environment relating to retailers’ and other companies’ obligation to protect such 15 sensitive data becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and evolving requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could result in additional costs; could have a significant impact on our current and planned privacy, data protection and information security-related practices, our collection, use, sharing, retention and safeguarding of customer and/or employee information, and some of our current or future business plans; and a material failure on our part to comply could subject us to fines or other regulatory sanctions and potentially to lawsuits. In recent years, there has been increasing regulatory enforcement and litigation activity in the area of privacy, data protection and information security in various states in which we operate. Notably, on January 1, 2020, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (the “CCPA”) became effective. The CCPA requires certain companies to satisfy new requirements regarding the handling of personal and sensitive data, including its use, protection and the ability of California residents whose data is stored to know specifically what data types each company has collected on them and, if they so choose, the right to demand that such companies delete their data. While we believe we have sufficient measures in place to comply with our obligations under the CCPA, failure to comply with its requirements could result in civil penalties, and it additionally provides a private right of action that allows consumers to seek, either individually or as a class, statutory or actual damages and injunctive and other relief, if their sensitive personal information is subject to unauthorized access and exfiltration, theft or disclosure as a result of a business’s failure to implement and maintain required reasonable security procedures. Compliance with the CCPA and other similar laws will likely increase the costs of doing business, especially if we face differing regulatory requirements across multiple jurisdictions and/or a lack of adequate regulatory guidance. New legislation or regulations such as the CCPA, including any potential comprehensive federal privacy legislation, as well as any associated inquiries or investigations or any other government actions, could also result in negative publicity, require significant management time and attention, and subject us to remedies that may harm our business, including fines or demands or orders that we modify or cease existing business practices. We are subject to payment-related risks that could increase our operating costs, expose us to fraud or theft, subject us to potential liability and potentially disrupt our business. We accept payments using a variety of methods, including cash, checks, credit and debit cards, and gift cards, and we may offer new payment options over time. Acceptance of these payment methods subjects us to rules, regulations, contractual obligations and compliance requirements, including payment network rules and operating guidelines, data security standards and certification requirements, and rules governing electronic funds transfers. These requirements may change over time or be reinterpreted, making compliance more difficult or costly. For certain payment methods, including credit and debit cards, we pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time and raise our operating costs. We rely on third parties to provide payment processing services, including the processing of credit cards, debit cards, and other forms of electronic payment. If these companies become unable to provide these services to us, or if their systems are compromised, it could potentially disrupt our business. The payment methods that we offer also subject us to potential fraud and theft by criminals, who are becoming increasingly more sophisticated, seeking to obtain unauthorized access to or exploit weaknesses that may exist in the payment systems. If we fail to comply with applicable rules or requirements for the payment methods we accept, or if payment-related data is compromised due to a breach or misuse of data, we may be liable for costs incurred by payment card issuing banks and other third parties or subject to fines and higher transaction fees, or our ability to accept or facilitate certain types of payments may be impaired. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in certain payment types, which may result in a shift to other payment types or potential changes to our payment systems that may result in higher costs. As a result, our business and operating results could be adversely affected. 16 Issues with merchandise safety could damage our reputation, sales and financial results. Various governmental authorities in the jurisdictions where we do business regulate the safety of the merchandise we sell to consumers. Regulations and standards in this area, including those related to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, state regulations like California’s Proposition 65, and similar legislation, impose restrictions and requirements on the merchandise we sell in our stores. These regulations change from time to time as new federal, state or local regulations are enacted. If we or our merchandise vendors are unable to comply with regulatory requirements on a timely basis or at all, or to adequately monitor new regulations that may apply to existing or new merchandise categories, significant fines or penalties could be incurred or we could have to curtail some aspects of our sales or operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. We rely on our vendors to provide quality merchandise that complies with applicable product safety laws and other applicable laws, but they may not comply with their obligations to do so. Although our arrangements with our vendors frequently provide for indemnification for product liabilities, the vendors may fail to honor those obligations to an extent we consider sufficient or at all. Issues with the safety of merchandise, and issues with the authenticity of merchandise, or customer concerns about such issues, regardless of our fault, could cause damage to our reputation and could result in lost sales, uninsured product liability claims or losses, merchandise recalls and increased costs, and regulatory, civil or criminal fines or penalties, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. Difficulty complying with existing laws, rules, regulations and local codes, or changes in existing laws, rules, regulations and local codes, could negatively affect our business operations and financial performance. We are subject to federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations in the operation of our business. In addition to complying with current laws, rules and regulations, we must also comply with new and changing laws and regulations, new regulatory initiatives, evolving interpretation of existing laws by judicial and regulatory authorities, and reforms in jurisdictions where we do business. Complying with local zoning codes, real estate land use restrictions, employment-related laws, and other local laws across numerous jurisdictions is particularly challenging as we grow the number of our stores in new municipalities and need to stay abreast of changes in such local laws. The increasing proliferation of local laws, some of which may be conflicting, further complicates our efforts to comply with all of the various laws, rules and regulations that apply to our business. All of the above legal, regulatory and administrative requirements collectively affect multiple aspects of our business, including those involving labor and employment benefits; health, welfare and finance; real estate management; consumer protection and product safety; climate change, supply chain, energy and waste; electronic communications, data protection and privacy; and protection of third party intellectual property rights. Changes to these laws and regulations could increase our costs of compliance or of doing business, and could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, if we fail to comply with these laws, rules and regulations, we may be subject to judgments, fines or other costs or penalties, which could materially adversely affect our business operations and financial performance. Changes in accounting standards and subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by management related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results or financial condition. Generally accepted accounting principles and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business, such as inventories, leases, and self-insurance reserves, are highly complex and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments. Changes in these rules or their interpretation, or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments, could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance or financial condition. 17 Our future growth and profitability could be adversely affected if our advertising and marketing programs are not effective in generating sufficient levels of customer awareness and traffic. We rely on advertising to increase consumer awareness of our product offerings and pricing to drive traffic to our stores. In addition, we rely and will increasingly rely on other forms of media advertising, including digital, social media and e-marketing. Our future growth and profitability will depend in part upon the effectiveness and efficiency of our advertising and marketing programs. Our advertising and marketing programs may not be successful if we do not: • manage advertising and marketing costs effectively in order to maintain acceptable operating margins and return on our marketing investment; and • convert customer awareness into actual store visits and product purchases. Our planned advertising and marketing expenditures may not result in increased total or comparable store sales or generate sufficient levels of product awareness. Further, we may not be able to manage our advertising and marketing expenditures on a cost-effective basis. Additionally, some of our competitors may have substantially larger marketing budgets, which may provide them with a competitive advantage over us. Damage to our corporate reputation or brand could adversely affect our sales and operating results. Building brand reputation is important to our continuing success. Our reputation is partially based on perceptions of various subjective qualities and overall integrity. Any incident that erodes the trust or confidence of our customers or the general public could adversely affect our reputation and business, particularly if the incident results in significant adverse publicity or governmental inquiry. In addition, information concerning us, whether or not true, may be instantly and easily posted on social media platforms and similar devices at any time, which information may be adverse to our reputation or business. The harm may be immediate without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction. Damage to our reputation in any form could result in declines in customer loyalty and sales, affect our vendor relationships, development opportunities and associate retention, and otherwise adversely affect our business. Use of social media by the Company or third parties at our direction may adversely impact our reputation or subject us to fines or other penalties. There has been a substantial increase in the use of social media platforms, including blogs, social media websites, and other forms of internet-based communications, which allow individuals access to a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. We have increasingly utilized social media in our marketing and employment recruiting efforts in order to reach as many current and potential new customers and potential employment candidates as efficiently and cost effectively as possible, and have also retained third parties with expertise and distinction in the social media realm to bolster our social media efforts. As laws and regulations rapidly evolve to govern the use of these platforms, the failure by us, our employees or third parties acting at our direction to abide by applicable laws and regulations in the use of these platforms could adversely impact our reputation or subject us to fines or other penalties. Legal and regulatory proceedings could have an adverse impact on our results of operations. We are subject to various legal and regulatory proceedings relating to our business, certain of which may involve jurisdictions with reputations for aggressive application of laws and procedures against corporate defendants. We are impacted by trends in litigation, such as representative claims under the California Private Attorneys’ General Act and class action litigation brought under various consumer protection, employment, and privacy and information security laws, including wage and hour lawsuits alleging employee misclassification as discussed in Note 17 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Commitments and Contingencies.” Accruals are established based on our best estimates of our potential liability. However, we cannot accurately predict the 18 ultimate outcome of any such proceedings due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation. Regardless of the outcome or whether the claims are meritorious, legal and regulatory proceedings may require that we devote substantial time and expense to defend our Company. Unfavorable rulings could result in a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our business could be impacted as a result of actions by activist stockholders or others. From time to time, we may be subject to legal and business challenges in the operation of our Company due to stockholder proposals, media campaigns, proxy contests, and other such actions instituted by activist stockholders or others. Responding to such actions could be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our operations, may not align with our business strategies and could divert the attention of our Board of Directors and senior management from the pursuit of current business strategies. Perceived uncertainties as to our future direction as a result of stockholder activism or potential changes to the composition of the Board of Directors may lead to the perception of a change in the direction of the business or other instability, and may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners. Circumstances limiting our ability, or the ability of our vendors, to access capital markets could adversely affect our business or financial condition. Changes in the credit and capital markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity and interest rate fluctuations, may increase the cost of financing or restrict our access to this potential source of future liquidity. A decrease in the ratings that rating agencies assign to our short- and long-term debt may also negatively impact our access to the debt financing markets and increase our cost of borrowing. These circumstances may negatively impact our access to capital markets, which could have a materially adverse impact on our business or financial condition. In many cases, our vendors depend upon commercial credit to finance their operations. If they are unable to secure commercial financing, our vendors could seek to change the terms on which they sell to us, which could negatively affect our liquidity. In addition, the inability of vendors to access liquidity, or the insolvency of vendors, could lead to their failure to deliver merchandise to us. Our substantial indebtedness requires a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate sufficient cash depends on numerous factors beyond our control, and we may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt obligations. As of February 1, 2020, our obligations include $957.5 million, inclusive of original issue discount, under our $1,200.0 million senior secured term loan facility (Term Loan Facility). We had no outstanding balance on our $600.0 million asset-based lending facility (ABL Line of Credit) as of February 1, 2020. Our debt obligations also include $50.1 million of finance lease obligations as of February 1, 2020. Estimated cash required to make interest payments for these debt obligations amounts to approximately $44.7 million for the fiscal year ending January 30, 2021. Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our debt, and to fund planned capital expenditures, will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future, which is to some extent subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt and meet our other commitments, we will be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as refinancing all or a portion of our debt, selling material assets or operations or raising additional debt or equity capital. We may not be able to successfully carry out any of these actions on a timely basis, on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or be assured that these actions would be sufficient to meet our capital requirements. In addition, the terms of our existing or future debt agreements, including the Term Loan Facility and the ABL Line of Credit, may restrict us from affecting any of these alternatives. 19 Our failure to comply with the agreements relating to our outstanding indebtedness, including as a result of events beyond our control, could result in an event of default that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and our financial condition. If an event of default under any of the agreements relating to our outstanding indebtedness occurred, the holders of the defaulted debt could cause all amounts outstanding with respect to that debt to be due and payable immediately. Our assets or cash flow may not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under our outstanding debt instruments if accelerated upon an event of default. Further, if we are unable to repay, refinance or restructure our secured indebtedness, the holders of such debt could proceed against the collateral securing that indebtedness through foreclosure proceedings and/or by forcing us into bankruptcy or liquidation. In addition, any event of default or declaration of acceleration under one debt instrument could also result in an event of default under one or more of our other debt instruments. It is unclear how increased regulatory oversight and changes in the method for determining LIBOR may affect the financial obligations owed by us that are linked to LIBOR, or how such changes could affect our results of operations or financial condition. In the recent past, concerns have been publicized that some of the member banks surveyed by British Bankers’ Association, or (the BBA), in connection with the calculation of LIBOR across a range of maturities and currencies may have been under-reporting, over-reporting or otherwise manipulating the inter-bank lending rate applicable to them in order to profit on their derivative positions or to avoid an appearance of capital insufficiency or adverse reputational or other consequences that may have resulted from reporting inter-bank lending rates higher than those they actually submitted. A number of BBA member banks entered into settlements with their regulators and law enforcement agencies with respect to alleged manipulation of LIBOR, and investigations by regulators and governmental authorities in various jurisdictions are ongoing. Other member banks may also enter into such settlements with, or have proceedings brought by, their regulators or law enforcement agencies in the future. If manipulation of LIBOR occurred, it may have resulted in LIBOR having been artificially lower (or higher) than it would otherwise have been. Any such manipulation could have occurred over a substantial period of time. On July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021. It is unclear whether LIBOR will cease to exist or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of large U.S. financial institutions, announced an alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR with a new index calculated by short term repurchase agreements, backed by Treasury securities, called the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR). Whether or not SOFR attains market traction as a LIBOR alternative or replacement for U.S. dollar- denominated instruments remains in question and future of LIBOR at this time is uncertain. To address a potential transition away from LIBOR, the Term Loan Facility and ABL Line of Credit agreements each provide for an agreed upon methodology to amend such agreements to substitute LIBOR with an agreed replacement rate, subject to our consent and the applicable administrative agent, and in each case subject to a short lender negative consent period. However, there is no guarantee that any such replacement rate would be agreed by the applicable agents and lenders or that such consents would be obtained, and in such event we would be required to pay a rate of interest higher than expected on the amount owed under such agreements where the interest rate is subject to LIBOR. We have also entered into LIBOR-based interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to interest rate movements resulting from changes in the benchmark interest rate of LIBOR. Any replacement of LIBOR as the basis on which interest on our floating-rate debt and/or under our interest rate swaps is calculated may result in interest rates and/or payments that do not correlate over time with the interest rates and/or payments that would have been made on our obligations if LIBOR was available in its current form. In addition, any further changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. 20 We are a holding company and rely on dividends, distributions and other payments, advances and transfers of funds from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations. We are a holding company that does not conduct any business operations of our own. As a result, we are largely dependent upon cash dividends and distributions and other transfers from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations. The deterioration of income from, or other available assets of, our subsidiaries for any reason could limit or impair their ability to pay dividends or other distributions to us. Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile. The market price of our common stock has fluctuated substantially in the past and may continue to fluctuate significantly. For example, in Fiscal 2019, our stock price fluctuated from a high of $236.02 to a low of $136.30. Future announcements or disclosures concerning us or any of our competitors, our strategic initiatives, our sales and profitability, our financial condition, any quarterly variations in actual or anticipated operating results or comparable sales, any failure to meet analysts’ expectations and sales of large blocks of our common stock, among other factors, could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. In addition, the stock market has experienced price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many retail and other stocks that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law might discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that stockholders might consider favorable. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of the Company more difficult without the approval of our Board of Directors. These provisions: • • • • • • • • authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common stock; prohibit stockholder action by written consent, requiring all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings; establish a classified Board of Directors, as a result of which our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with each class serving for staggered three-year terms, which prevents stockholders from electing an entirely new Board of Directors at an annual meeting; limit the ability of stockholders to remove directors only for cause and only upon the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the outstanding shares of our common stock; prohibit stockholders from calling special meetings of stockholders; provide that the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to alter or repeal our amended and restated bylaws; and require the approval of holders of at least 75% of the outstanding shares of our voting common stock to amend the amended and restated bylaws and certain provisions of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation. These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of the Company, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders. 21 These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors of their choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions they desire. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, subject to limited exceptions, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or (iv) any other action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation described above. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition. Because we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the near term, stockholders may not receive any return on investment unless they are able to sell their common stock for a price greater than their purchase price. The continued operation and expansion of our business will require substantial funding. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends on shares of our common stock in the near term. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, including those under our ABL Line of Credit and Term Loan Facility, any potential future indebtedness we may incur, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant. Accordingly, if stockholders purchase shares of our common stock, realization of a gain on investment will depend on the appreciation of the price of our common stock, which may never occur. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Not Applicable. 22 Item 2. Properties We own the land and/or buildings for 36 of our stores and have leases for 690 of our stores. Our new stores are generally leased for an initial term of ten to fifteen years, the majority of which are subject to our option to renew such leases for several additional five-year periods. Store leases generally provide for fixed monthly rental payments, plus the payment, in most cases, of real estate taxes and other charges with escalation clauses. In many locations, our store leases contain formulas providing for the payment of additional rent based on sales. Most of our stores are freestanding or located in regional power centers, strip shopping centers or in malls. Primary Distribution Centers: Edgewater Park, New Jersey(a) Burlington, New Jersey (Daniels Way) San Bernardino, California Redlands, California (Pioneer Ave) Riverside, California (Cactus Ave)(b) Warehousing Facilities: Burlington, New Jersey (Route 130 North)(a) Burlington, New Jersey (Richards Run) Redlands, California (River Bluff Ave) Calendar Year Operational Size (sq. feet) Leased or Owned 2004 2014 2006 2014 2020 1987 2017 2017 648,000 678,000 758,000 800,000 900,000 402,000 511,000 543,000 Owned Leased Leased Leased Leased Owned Leased Leased Inclusive of corporate offices. (a) (b) The lease for this distribution center was signed during Fiscal 2018. We own approximately 235 acres of land in Burlington and Florence, New Jersey on which we have constructed our corporate campus, which includes our corporate headquarters and a warehouse facility. We own approximately 43 acres of land in Edgewater Park, New Jersey on which we have constructed our Edgewater Park, New Jersey distribution center and an office facility. We lease approximately 35,000 square feet of office space in New York City (east coast buying office), and we are relocating our 10,000 square feet of office space in Los Angeles, California (west coast buying office) to a larger space consisting of approximately 25,000 square feet. Item 3. Legal Proceedings Like many retailers, the Company has been named in potential class or collective actions on behalf of groups alleging violations of federal and state wage and hour and other labor statutes, and alleged violation of state consumer and/or privacy protection and other statutes. In the normal course of business, we are also party to representative claims under the California Private Attorneys’ General Act and various other lawsuits and regulatory proceedings including, among others, commercial, product, product safety, employee, customer, intellectual property and other claims. Actions against us are in various procedural stages. Many of these proceedings raise factual and legal issues and are subject to uncertainties. Refer to Note 17 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Commitments and Contingencies,” for further detail. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. 23 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Market Information Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BURL.” Holders As of February 28, 2020, we had 277 holders of record of our common stock. This figure does not include the significantly greater number of beneficial holders of our common stock. Dividends During the past two fiscal years, we have not declared, and do not anticipate declaring in the near term, dividends on shares of our common stock. We currently do, and intend to continue to, retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund all of the Company’s capital expenditures, business initiatives, and to support any potential opportunistic capital structure initiatives. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, including those under our ABL Line of Credit and Term Loan Facility, any potential future indebtedness we may incur, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant. In addition, since we are a holding company, substantially all of the assets shown on our consolidated balance sheets are held by our subsidiaries. Accordingly, our earnings, cash flow and ability to pay dividends are largely dependent upon the earnings and cash flows of our subsidiaries and the distribution or other payment of such earnings to us in the form of dividends. 24 Stock Performance Graph The performance graph below and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing. The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from the closing prices as of the end of each fiscal year from January 31, 2015 through February 1, 2020, with the return on the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index and the S&P Retailing Index over the same period. This graph assumes an initial investment of $100 and assumes the reinvestment of dividends, if any. Such returns are based on historical results and are not intended to suggest future performance. Cumulative Stockholder Return Performance Assumes Initial Investment of $100 $500.00 $400.00 $300.00 $200.00 $100.00 1/31/2015 1/30/2016 1/28/2017 2/3/2018 2/2/2019 2/1/2020 Burlington Stores Inc. S&P 500 S&P 500 Retailing Index Company / Index Burlington Stores, Inc. S&P 500 Index S&P Retailing Index Base Period January 31, 2015 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 Indexed Returns for Fiscal Years Ended January 30, 2016 January 28, 2017 February 3, 2018 February 2, 2019 February 1, 2020 $107.70 $ 97.26 $115.56 $162.18 $115.02 $135.54 $232.01 $138.45 $189.60 $344.50 $135.67 $203.54 $435.90 $161.68 $243.26 25 Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers The following table provides information regarding our purchases of common stock during the three fiscal months ended February 1, 2020: Month November 3, 2019 through November 30, 2019 December 1, 2019 through January 4, 2020 January 5, 2020 through February 1, 2020 Total Total Number of Shares Purchased(1) Average Price Paid Per Share 80,462 236,574 77,133 394,169 $202.70 $224.90 $227.43 Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (in thousands) $466,615 $413,505 $398,546 Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(2) 73,731 236,145 65,653 375,529 (1) The number of shares purchased between November 3, 2019 and November 30, 2019, between December 1, 2019 and January 4, 2020 and between January 5, 2020 and February 1, 2020 include 6,731 shares, 429 shares and 11,480 shares, respectively, which were withheld for tax payments due upon the vesting of employee restricted stock awards, and do not reduce the dollar value that may yet be purchased under our publicly announced share repurchase program. (2) On August 15, 2018, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300 million of common stock, which was completed during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019. On August 14, 2019, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $400 million of common stock, which is authorized to be executed through August 2021. For a further discussion of our share repurchase programs, see Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Share Repurchase Program. 26 Item 6. Selected Financial Data The following table presents selected historical consolidated financial data. The historical consolidated balance sheet data and consolidated statement of operations data for Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017 and for the fiscal years ended January 28, 2017 (Fiscal 2016) and January 30, 2016 (Fiscal 2015) have been derived from our historical audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The historical consolidated financial data presented below should only be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements (and the related notes thereto) and Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, each of which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Our historical consolidated financial data may not be indicative of our future performance. Fiscal Year Ended(1) February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 February 3, 2018 January 28, 2017 January 30, 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: Net sales $7,261,243 $6,643,051 $6,084,766 $5,566,038 $5,098,932 Net income $ 465,116 $ 414,745 $ 384,852 $ 215,873 $ 150,482 Net income per common share—basic: Net income per common share—diluted: $ $ 7.05 $ 6.91 $ 6.21 $ 6.04 $ 5.64 $ 5.48 $ 3.06 $ 3.01 $ 2.03 1.99 Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (end of the period): Inventory Total assets Long term debt Stockholders’ equity (deficit) Other Financial Data: Adjusted Net Income(2) Adjusted EBITDA(3) Comparable store sales growth(4) Gross margin rate Store payroll as a percentage of net sales Cash flow increase (decrease) Working capital (deficit)(5) Number of stores Gross square footage (in thousands) Selling square footage (in thousands) $ 777,248 $ 954,183 $ 752,562 $ 701,891 $ 783,528 $5,593,859 $3,079,172 $2,812,829 $2,574,483 $2,571,813 $1,001,723 $ 983,643 $1,113,808 $1,128,843 $1,295,163 86,774 $ (49,812)$ (99,022) $ 528,149 $ 322,710 $ $ 498,784 $ 442,540 $ 405,753 $ 232,268 $ 174,555 $ 883,905 $ 792,215 $ 696,066 $ 584,562 $ 484,029 2.7% 41.8% 8.6% 3.2% 41.8% 8.5% $ 275,500 $ (26,930)$ $ (51,112)$ 4.5% 3.4% 40.8% 41.5% 8.5% 8.5% 60,682 $ 51,689 $ 2,276 $ (46,998)$ (96,310)$ 629 45,693 33,305 592 44,736 34,234 675 46,773 32,898 727 47,449 31,997 2.1% 40.0% 8.6% (4,434) 18,594 567 43,468 33,230 (1) Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 consisted of 52 weeks. Fiscal 2017 consisted of 53 weeks. (2) We define Adjusted Net Income as net income, exclusive of the following items: (i) net favorable lease costs, (ii) costs related to debt amendments and secondary offerings, (iii) stock option modification expense, (iv) loss on extinguishment of debt, (v) impairment charges, (vi) advisory fees, (vii) amounts related to certain litigation and (viii) other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains, all of which are tax effected to arrive at Adjusted Net Income. For further discussion of Adjusted Net Income, including a reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income to net income, see Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Performance Measures. (3) We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income, exclusive of the following items: (i) interest expense, (ii) interest income, (iii) loss on extinguishment of debt, (iv) income tax expense (benefit), (v) depreciation and amortization, (vi) impairment charges, (vii) advisory fees, (viii) stock option modification expense, 27 (ix) costs related to debt amendments and secondary offerings, (x) amounts related to certain litigation and (xi) other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains. For further discussion of Adjusted EBITDA, including a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, see Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Performance Measures. (4) We define comparable store sales as sales of those stores, including online sales, commencing on the first day of the fiscal month one year after the end of their grand opening activities, which normally conclude within the first two months of operations. Our comparable store sales are based on a 52-week basis. (5) We define working capital as current assets (excluding restricted cash) minus current liabilities. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations For purposes of the following “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” unless the context requires otherwise, references to “the Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” refer to Burlington Stores, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The following discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting our consolidated operating results, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows as of and for the periods presented below. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with “Item 6, Selected Financial Data” and our Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions set forth under the caption above entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results and the timing of events may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth in Item 1A, Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report. General We are a nationally recognized retailer of high-quality, branded apparel at everyday low prices. We opened our first store in Burlington, New Jersey in 1972, selling primarily coats and outerwear. Since then, we have expanded our store base to 727 stores as of February 1, 2020, inclusive of an internet store, in 45 states and Puerto Rico. We have diversified our product categories by offering an extensive selection of in-season, fashion- focused merchandise at up to 60% off other retailers’ prices, including: women’s ready-to-wear apparel, menswear, youth apparel, baby, beauty, footwear, accessories, home, toys, gifts and coats. We sell a broad selection of desirable, first-quality, current-brand, labeled merchandise acquired directly from nationally- recognized manufacturers and other suppliers. Executive Summary Overview of Fiscal 2019 Operating Results Highlights from Fiscal 2019 compared with Fiscal 2018 include the following: • We generated total revenues of $7,286.4 million compared with $6,668.5 million. • Net sales improved $618.2 million to $7,261.2 million. Comparable store sales increased 2.7%. • Gross margin as a percentage of net sales remained consistent at 41.8%. Product sourcing costs, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses, remained flat as a percentage of net sales. Product sourcing costs include the costs of processing goods through our supply chain and buying costs. 28 • Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to 30.7% compared with 30.4%. • We earned net income of $465.1 million compared with $414.7 million, an increase of $50.4 million. • Adjusted Net Income (as defined in the section below entitled “Key Performance Measures”), exclusive of management transition costs, improved $56.2 million to $498.8 million. • Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the section below entitled “Key Performance Measures”), exclusive of management transition costs, improved $91.7 million to $883.9 million. • Adjusted EBIT (as defined in the section below entitled “Key Performance Measures”), exclusive of management transition costs, improved $73.1 million to $673.6 million. Store Openings, Closings and Relocations During Fiscal 2019, we opened 76 new stores, inclusive of 16 relocations, and closed eight stores, exclusive of the aforementioned relocations, bringing our store count as of February 1, 2020 to 727 stores, inclusive of an internet store. We will wind down operations of the internet store during Fiscal 2020. We continue to pursue our growth plans and invest in capital projects that meet our financial requirements. During the fiscal year ending January 30, 2021 (Fiscal 2020), we plan to open approximately 54 net new stores, which includes approximately 80 gross new stores, along with approximately 26 store relocations and closings. Ongoing Initiatives for Fiscal 2020 We continue to focus on a number of ongoing initiatives aimed at driving merchandise value and increasing our overall profitability by improving our comparable store sales trends, increasing total sales growth and reducing expenses. These initiatives include: • Driving Comparable Store Sales Growth. We intend to continue to increase comparable store sales through the following initiatives: • More Effectively Chasing the Sales Trend. We are planning a more conservative comparable stores sales growth, holding and controlling liquidity, closely analyzing the sales trend by business, and being ready to chase that trend. We believe that these actions should not only enable us to more effectively chase the trend, but they will also allow us to take more advantage of great opportunistic buys. • Making a Greater Investment in Merchandising Capabilities. We intend to invest in incremental headcount, especially in growing or under-developed businesses, training and coaching, improved tools and reporting, and other forms of merchant support. We believe that these investments should improve our ability to develop vendor relationships, source great merchandise buys, more accurately assess value, and better forecast and chase the sales trend. • Operating with Leaner Inventories. We are planning to carry less inventory going forward, which we believe should result in the customer finding a higher mix of fresh receipts and great merchandise values within the racks. We believe that this should drive faster turns and lower markdowns, while simultaneously improving our customers’ shopping experience. • Enhancing Existing Categories and Introducing New Categories. We have opportunities to expand the depth and breadth of certain existing categories, such as ladies’ apparel, children’s products, bath and cosmetic merchandise, housewares, décor for the home and beauty as we continue to de-weather our business, and maintain the flexibility to introduce new categories as we expand our merchandising capabilities. 29 • Expanding and Enhancing Our Retail Store Base. We intend to expand and enhance our retail store base through the following initiatives: • Adhering to a Market Focused and Financially Disciplined Real Estate Strategy. We have grown our store base consistently since our founding in 1972, developing more than 99% of our stores organically. We believe there is significant opportunity to expand our retail store base in the United States. We have identified numerous market opportunities that we believe will allow us to operate at least 1,000 stores over the long term. • Maintaining Focus on Unit Economics and Returns. We have adopted a market focused approach to new store openings with a specific focus on maximizing sales while achieving attractive unit economics and returns. This focus is demonstrated by the fact that more than 98% of our existing stores had positive Adjusted EBIT for Fiscal 2019. By focusing on opening stores with attractive unit economics, we believe that we are able to achieve attractive returns on capital and continue to grow our margins. We believe that as we continue to reduce our comparable store inventory, we will be able to reduce the square footage of our stores while continuing to maintain our broad assortment. • Enhancing the Store Experience Through Store Remodels and Relocations. We continue to invest in store remodels on a store-by-store basis where appropriate, taking into consideration the age, sales and profitability of a store, as well as the potential impact to the customer shopping experience. During Fiscal 2019, we remodeled 28 of our stores and relocated 16 stores. In our remodeled stores, we have typically incorporated new flooring, painting, lighting and graphics, relocated our fitting rooms to maximize productive selling space, enhanced certain departments such as home and accessories and made various other improvements as appropriate by location. • Enhancing Operating Margins. We intend to increase our operating margins through the following initiatives: • Improving Operational Flexibility. Our store and supply chain teams must continue to respond to the challenge of becoming more responsive to the sales chase, enhancing their ability at flexing up and down based on trends. Their ability to appropriately flex based on the ongoing trends allows us to maximize leverage on sales, regardless of the trend. • Optimizing Markdowns. We believe that our markdown system allows us to maximize sales and gross margin dollars based on forward-looking sales forecasts, sell-through targets and exit dates. Additionally, as we plan to carry less inventory in our stores, we expect to drive faster turns, which in turn will reduce the amount of markdowns taken. • Enhancing Purchasing Power. We believe that increasing our store footprint and expanding our west coast buying office provides us with the opportunity to capture incremental buying opportunities and realize economies of scale in our merchandising and non-merchandising purchasing activities. • Challenging Expenses to Drive Operating Leverage. We believe that we will be able to leverage our growing sales over the fixed costs of our business. In addition, by more conservatively planning our comparable store sales growth, we are forcing even tighter expense control. We believe that this should put us in a strong position to drive operating leverage on any sales ahead of the plan. Additionally, we plan to continue challenging the processes and operating norms throughout the organization with the belief that this will lead to incremental efficiency improvements and savings. Uncertainties and Challenges As we strive to increase profitability through achieving positive comparable store sales and leveraging productivity initiatives focused on improving the in-store experience, more efficient movement of products from 30 the vendors to the selling floors, and modifying our marketing plans to increase our core customer base and increase our share of our current customers’ spending, there are uncertainties and challenges that we face as an off-price retailer of apparel and accessories for men, women and children and home furnishings that could have a material impact on our revenues or income. Seasonality of Sales and Weather Conditions. Our business, like that of most retailers, is subject to seasonal influences. In the second half of the year, which includes the back-to-school and holiday seasons, we generally realize a higher level of sales and net income. Weather continues to be a contributing factor to the sale of our clothing. Generally, our sales are higher if the weather is cold during the Fall and warm during the early Spring. Sales of cold weather clothing are increased by early cold weather during the Fall, while sales of warm weather clothing are improved by early warm weather conditions in the Spring. Although we have diversified our product offerings, we believe traffic to our stores is still driven, in part, by weather patterns. General Economic Conditions. Consumer spending habits, including spending for the merchandise that we sell, are affected by, among other things, prevailing global economic conditions, inflation, levels of employment, salaries and wage rates, prevailing interest rates, housing costs, energy costs, commodities pricing, income tax rates and policies, consumer confidence and consumer perception of economic conditions. In addition, consumer purchasing patterns may be influenced by consumers’ disposable income, credit availability and debt levels. A slowdown in the U.S. economy, an uncertain global economic outlook or a credit crisis could adversely affect consumer spending habits resulting in lower net sales and profits than expected on a quarterly or annual basis. Consumer confidence is also affected by the domestic and international political situation. Our financial condition and operations could be impacted by changes in government regulations in areas including taxes and healthcare. The outbreak or escalation of war, the occurrence of terrorist acts or other hostilities in or affecting the U.S., or public health issues such as pandemics or epidemics, including the recent outbreak of a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19), could lead to a decrease in spending by consumers. We are continuing to monitor and assess the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak on our operations. In addition, natural disasters, industrial accidents, acts of war in various parts of the world and public health issues could have the effect of disrupting supplies and raising prices globally which, in turn, may have adverse effects on the world and U.S. economies and lead to a downturn in consumer confidence and spending. We closely monitor our net sales, gross margin and expenses. We have performed scenario planning such that, if our net sales decline, we have identified variable costs that could be reduced to partially mitigate the impact of these declines. If we were to experience adverse economic trends and our efforts to counteract the impacts of these trends are not sufficiently effective, there could be a negative impact on our financial performance and position in future fiscal periods. Competition and Margin Pressure. We believe that in order to remain competitive with retailers, including off-price retailers and discount stores, we must continue to offer brand-name merchandise at a discount to prices offered by other retailers as well as an assortment of merchandise that is appealing to our customers. The U.S. retail apparel and home furnishings markets are highly fragmented and competitive. We compete for business with department stores, off-price retailers, specialty stores, discount stores, wholesale clubs, and outlet stores as well as with certain traditional, full-price retail chains that have developed off-price concepts. At various times throughout the year, traditional full-price department store chains and specialty shops offer brand- name merchandise at substantial markdowns, which can result in prices approximating those offered by us at our Burlington Stores. We anticipate that competition will increase in the future. Therefore, we will continue to look for ways to differentiate our stores from those of our competitors. The U.S. retail industry continues to face increased pressure on margins as overall challenging retail conditions have led consumers to be more value conscious. Our “open to buy” paradigm, in which we purchase 31 both pre-season and in-season merchandise, allows us the flexibility to purchase less pre-season with the balance purchased in-season and opportunistically. It also provides us with the flexibility to shift purchases between suppliers and categories. This enables us to obtain better terms with our suppliers, which we expect to help offset any rising costs of goods. Ongoing international trade and tariff negotiations could have a direct impact on our income and an indirect impact on consumer prices. Key Performance Measures We consider numerous factors in assessing our performance. Key performance measures used by management include net income, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBIT, comparable store sales, gross margin, inventory, store payroll as a percentage of net sales and liquidity. Net income. We earned net income of $465.1 million during Fiscal 2019 compared with net income of $414.7 million during Fiscal 2018. This improvement was primarily driven by our improved gross margin dollars, partially offset by an increase in our selling, general and administrative expenses. Refer to the section below entitled “Results of Operations” for further explanation. Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT: Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT are non-GAAP financial measures of our performance. We define Adjusted Net Income as net income, exclusive of the following items, if applicable: (i) net favorable lease costs; (ii) costs related to debt amendments; (iii) stock option modification expense; (iv) loss on extinguishment of debt; (v) impairment charges; and (vi) other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains, all of which are tax effected to arrive at Adjusted Net Income. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income, exclusive of the following items, if applicable: (i) interest expense; (ii) interest income; (iii) loss on extinguishment of debt; (iv) income tax expense; (v) depreciation and amortization; (vi) impairment charges; (vii) stock option modification expense; (viii) costs related to debt amendments; and (ix) other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains. We define Adjusted EBIT as net income, exclusive of the following items, if applicable: (i) interest expense; (ii) interest income (iii) loss on extinguishment of debt; (iv) income tax expense; (v) impairment charges; (vi) stock option modification expense; (vii) net favorable lease costs; (viii) costs related to debt amendments; and (ix) other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains. We present Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT because we believe they are useful supplemental measures in evaluating the performance of our business and provide greater transparency into our results of operations. In particular, we believe that excluding certain items that may vary substantially in frequency and magnitude from operating income are useful supplemental measures that assist investors and management in evaluating our ability to generate earnings and leverage sales, and to more readily compare these metrics between past and future periods. Additionally, Adjusted Net Income per share (subject to further adjustment by the Compensation Committee of the board of directors) is used for purposes of determining 50% of the awards made under our corporate annual incentive plan. Adjusted Net Income has limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered either in isolation or as a substitute for net income or other data prepared in accordance with GAAP. Among other limitations, Adjusted Net Income does not reflect the following items, net of their tax effect: • • favorable lease costs; costs related to debt amendments; 32 • • • • expenses related to our May 2013 stock option modification; losses on extinguishment of debt; impairment charges on long-lived assets; and other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains. During Fiscal 2019, Adjusted Net Income, exclusive of management transition costs, improved $56.2 million to $498.8 million. This improvement was primarily driven by our improved gross margin dollars, partially offset by an increase in our selling, general and administrative expenses. Refer to the section below entitled “Results of Operations” for further explanation. The following table shows our reconciliation of net income to Adjusted Net Income for Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017: Reconciliation of net income to Adjusted Net Income: Net income Net favorable lease costs(a) Costs related to debt amendments(b) Stock option modification expense(c) Loss on extinguishment of debt(d) Impairment charges(e) Tax effect(f) Adjusted Net Income Management transition costs, net of tax effect(g) Adjusted Net Income, exclusive of management transition costs (unaudited) (in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $465,116 35,761 (375) — — 4,315 (10,083) $414,745 26,081 2,496 — 1,823 6,844 (9,449) $384,852 23,325 2,262 142 2,881 2,127 (9,836) 494,734 442,540 405,753 4,050 — — $498,784 $442,540 $405,753 (a) Net favorable lease costs represents the non-cash expense associated with favorable and unfavorable leases that were recorded as a result of purchase accounting related to the April 13, 2006 Bain Capital acquisition of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (the Merger Transaction). As a result of adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, “Leases” (ASU 2016-02), these expenses are recorded in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statement of Income for Fiscal 2019. These expenses are recorded in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in our Consolidated Statements of Income for Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017. (b) Represents costs incurred in connection with review and execution of refinancing opportunities and the reversal of previously estimated costs related to the repricing of our senior secured term loan facility (the Term Loan Facility) in Fiscal 2018. (c) Represents expenses incurred as a result of our May 2013 stock option modification. Refer to Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Stock-Based Compensation,” for further detail. (d) For Fiscal 2018, amounts relate to the refinancing of our Term Loan Facility, the $150.0 million prepayment on the Term Loan Facility and an amendment to our Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 2, 2011 governing our ABL Line of Credit (the ABL Credit Agreement). For Fiscal 2017, amounts relate to the repricing and extension of our Term Loan Facility. 33 (e) Represents impairment charges on long-lived assets. (f) Tax effect is calculated based on the effective tax rates (before discrete items) for the respective periods, for the tax impact of items (a) through (e). (g) Represents costs incurred as a result of hiring a new Chief Executive Officer, primarily related to sign-on and duplicative compensation costs. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered either in isolation or as a substitute for net income or other data prepared in accordance with GAAP. Among other limitations, Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect: • • • • • • • • interest expense on our debt; losses on the extinguishment of debt; costs related to debt amendments; expenses related to our May 2013 stock option modification; cash requirements for replacement of assets. Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will likely have to be replaced in the future; impairment charges on long-lived assets; income tax expense; and other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains. During Fiscal 2019, Adjusted EBITDA, exclusive of management transition costs, improved $91.7 million to $883.9 million. This improvement was primarily driven by our improved gross margin dollars, partially offset by an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses. Refer to the section below entitled “Results of Operations” for further explanation. The following table shows our reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA for Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017: (unaudited) (in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $465,116 50,826 (1,720) — (375) — 246,109 4,315 115,409 879,680 4,225 $414,745 55,990 (406) 1,823 2,496 — 217,884 6,844 92,839 792,215 — $384,852 58,777 (206) 2,881 2,262 142 201,103 2,127 44,128 696,066 — $883,905 $792,215 $696,066 Reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA: Net income Interest expense Interest income Loss on extinguishment of debt(a) Costs related to debt amendments(b) Stock option modification expense(c) Depreciation and amortization(d) Impairment charges(e) Income tax expense Adjusted EBITDA Management transition costs(f) Adjusted EBITDA, exclusive of management transition costs 34 (a) For Fiscal 2018, amounts relate to the refinancing of our Term Loan Facility, the $150.0 million prepayment on the Term Loan Facility and the amendment of the ABL Credit Agreement. For Fiscal 2017, amounts relate to the repricing and extension of our Term Loan Facility. (b) Represents costs incurred in connection with review and execution of refinancing opportunities and the reversal of previously estimated costs related to the repricing of our Term Loan Facility in Fiscal 2018. (c) Represents expenses incurred as a result of our May 2013 stock option modification. Refer to Note 12 to our (d) Consolidated Financial Statements, “Stock-Based Compensation,” for further detail. Includes $35.4 million of favorable lease cost included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statement of Income for Fiscal 2019. Net favorable lease cost represents the non-cash expense associated with favorable and unfavorable leases that were recorded as a result of the Merger Transaction. As a result of adoption of ASU 2016-02, these expenses are recorded in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statement of Income for Fiscal 2019. These expenses are recorded in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in our Consolidated Statements of Income for Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017. (e) Represents impairment charges on long-lived assets. (f) Represents costs incurred as a result of hiring a new Chief Executive Officer, primarily related to sign-on and duplicative compensation costs. Adjusted EBIT has limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered either in isolation or as a substitute for net income or other data prepared in accordance with GAAP. Among other limitations, Adjusted EBIT does not reflect: • • • • • • • • interest expense on our debt; losses on the extinguishment of debt; costs related to debt amendments; expenses related to our May 2013 stock option modification; favorable lease cost; impairment charges on long-lived assets; income tax expense; and other unusual, non-recurring or extraordinary expenses, losses, charges or gains. During Fiscal 2019, Adjusted EBIT, exclusive of management transition costs, improved $73.1 million to $673.6 million. This improvement was primarily driven by our improved gross margin dollars, partially offset by an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses. Refer to the section below entitled “Results of Operations” for further explanation. 35 The following table shows our reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBIT for Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017: Reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBIT: Net income Interest expense Interest income Loss on extinguishment of debt(a) Costs related to debt amendments(b) Stock option modification expense(c) Net favorable lease costs(d) Impairment charges(e) Income tax expense Adjusted EBIT Management transition costs(f) (unaudited) (in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 $465,116 50,826 (1,720) — (375) — 35,761 4,315 115,409 669,332 4,225 $414,745 55,990 (406) 1,823 2,496 — 26,081 6,844 92,839 600,412 — February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $384,852 58,777 (206) 2,881 2,262 142 23,325 2,127 44,128 518,288 — Adjusted EBIT, exclusive of management transition costs $673,557 $600,412 $518,288 (a) For Fiscal 2018, amounts relate to the refinancing of our Term Loan Facility, the $150.0 million prepayment on the Term Loan Facility and the amendment of the ABL Credit Agreement. For Fiscal 2017, amounts relate to the repricing and extension of our Term Loan Facility. (b) Represents costs incurred in connection with review and execution of refinancing opportunities and the reversal of previously estimated costs related to the repricing of our Term Loan Facility in Fiscal 2018. (c) Represents expenses incurred as a result of our May 2013 stock option modification. Refer to Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Stock-Based Compensation,” for further detail. (d) Net favorable lease cost represents the non-cash expense associated with favorable and unfavorable leases that were recorded as a result of purchase accounting related to the Merger Transaction. As a result of adoption of ASU 2016-02, these expenses are recorded in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statement of Income for Fiscal 2019. These expenses are recorded in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in our Consolidated Statements of Income for Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017. (e) Represents impairment charges on long-lived assets. (f) Represents costs incurred as a result of hiring a new Chief Executive Officer, primarily related to sign-on and duplicative compensation costs. Comparable Store Sales. Comparable store sales measure performance of a store during the current reporting period against the performance of the same store in the corresponding period of the previous year. The method of calculating comparable store sales varies across the retail industry. As a result, our definition of comparable store sales may differ from other retailers. This metric is also used for purposes of determining 50% of the awards made under our corporate annual incentive plan. We define comparable store sales as sales of those stores, including our online store, commencing on the first day of the fiscal month one year after the end of their grand opening activities, which normally conclude within the first two months of operations. If a store is closed for seven or more days during a month, our policy is to remove that store from our calculation of comparable stores sales for any such month, as well as during the 36 month(s) of their grand re-opening activities. The table below depicts our comparable store sales during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, all of which are calculated on a 52-week basis. Fiscal 2019 Fiscal 2018 Fiscal 2017 Comparable Store Sales 2.7% 3.2% 3.4% Various factors affect comparable store sales, including weather conditions, current economic conditions, the timing of our releases of new merchandise and promotional events, the general retail sales environment, consumer preferences and buying trends, changes in sales mix among distribution channels, competition and the success of marketing programs. Gross Margin. Gross margin is the difference between net sales and the cost of sales. Our cost of sales and gross margin may not be comparable to those of other entities, since some entities include all of the costs related to their buying and distribution functions, and other costs, in cost of sales. We include certain of these costs in the line items “Selling, general and administrative expenses” and “Depreciation and amortization” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We include in our “Cost of sales” line item all costs of merchandise (net of purchase discounts and certain vendor allowances), inbound freight, distribution center outbound freight and certain merchandise acquisition costs, primarily commissions and import fees. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales remained consistent at 41.8% during Fiscal 2019. Increased merchandise margin was offset by higher freight costs. Inventory. Inventory at February 1, 2020 decreased to $777.2 million from $954.2 million at February 2, 2019. This decrease was primarily related to our pack-and hold inventory levels, which were 26% of total inventory at the end of Fiscal 2019 compared to 30% at the end of Fiscal 2018, as well as a 15% decrease in comparable store inventory and a decrease in short stay inventory. These decreases were partially offset by our 52 net new stores opened since February 2, 2019. In order to better serve our customers and maximize sales, we continue to refine our merchandising mix and inventory levels within our stores. By appropriately managing our inventories, we believe we will be better able to deliver a continual flow of fresh merchandise to our customers. We continue to move toward more productive inventories by increasing the amount of current inventory as a percent of total inventory. Inventory turnover and comparable store inventory turnover are performance metrics that indicate how efficiently inventory is bought and sold. They each measure the length of time that we own our inventory. Inventory turnover is calculated by dividing cost of goods sold by the 13-month average cost value of our inventory for the period being measured. Our inventory turnover rate improved approximately 6% during Fiscal 2019, compared with Fiscal 2018. Comparable store inventory turnover is calculated by dividing comparable store sales by the average comparable store retail value of inventory for the period being measured. The comparable store retail value of inventories is estimated based on the original sales price of items on hand reduced by retail reductions, which include sales, markdowns taken, an estimated shortage adjustment and employee discounts, for our comparable stores. The calculation is based on a rolling 13-month average of inventory (at estimated retail value) and the last 12 months’ comparable store sales. Our comparable store inventory turnover rate improved approximately 13% during Fiscal 2019 compared with Fiscal 2018. The difference between inventory turnover and comparable store inventory turnover is primarily the result of the latter not including distribution center and warehouse inventory or inventory at new and non-comparable 37 stores. Inventory held at our warehouses and distribution centers includes merchandise being readied for shipment to our stores and pack-and-hold inventory acquired opportunistically for future store release. The magnitude of pack-and-hold inventory, at any one point in time, is dependent on the buying opportunities identified in the marketplace. We present inventory turnover because it demonstrates how effective we are at managing our inventory. We present comparable store inventory turnover as we believe this is a useful supplemental metric in evaluating the effectiveness of our merchandising efforts, as a faster comparable store inventory turnover generally leads to reduced markdowns and more fresh merchandise in our stores. Store Payroll as a Percentage of Net Sales. Store payroll as a percentage of net sales measures our ability to manage our payroll in accordance with increases or decreases in net sales. The method of calculating store payroll varies across the retail industry. As a result, our store payroll as a percentage of net sales may differ from other retailers. We define store payroll as regular and overtime payroll for all store personnel as well as regional and territory personnel, exclusive of payroll charges related to corporate and warehouse employees. Store payroll as a percentage of net sales was 8.6% during Fiscal 2019, compared with 8.5% during Fiscal 2018. Liquidity. Liquidity measures our ability to generate cash. Management measures liquidity through cash flow, which is the measure of cash generated from or used in operating, financing, and investing activities. Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash and cash equivalents, increased $275.5 million during Fiscal 2019, compared with a decrease of $26.9 million during Fiscal 2018. Refer to the section below entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further explanation. Results of Operations The following table sets forth certain items in the Consolidated Statements of Income as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated. Percentage of Net Sales Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 100.0% 0.4 100.0% 0.4 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) 100.0% 0.4 100.4 58.2 30.7 (0.0) — 2.9 0.1 (0.2) — 0.7 92.4 8.0 1.6 100.4 58.2 30.4 0.0 — 3.3 0.1 (0.2) 0.0 0.8 92.6 7.8 1.4 100.4 58.5 30.6 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 (0.1) 0.0 1.0 93.3 7.1 0.7 6.4% 6.4% 6.4% Net sales Other revenue Total revenue Cost of sales Selling, general and administrative expenses Costs related to debt amendments Stock option modification expense Depreciation and amortization Impairment charges—long-lived assets Other income—net Loss on extinguishment of debt Interest expense Total costs and expenses Income before income tax expense Income tax expense Net income 38 Performance for Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 (Fiscal 2019) Compared with Fiscal Year Ended February 2, 2019 (Fiscal 2018) Net sales Net sales improved $618.2 million, or 9.3%, to $7,261.2 million, driven by the following: • • • an increase of $503.3 million from our new and non-comparable stores; and an increase in comparable store sales of $172.8 million, to $6,537.9 million; partially offset by a $57.9 million decrease related to the net impact of permanently closed stores and other sales adjustments. Cost of sales Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales remained consistent at 58.2% during Fiscal 2019. Increased merchandise margins were offset by higher freight costs. Product sourcing costs, which are included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Income, remained flat as a percentage of net sales. On a dollar basis, cost of sales increased $360.6 million, or 9.3%, primarily driven by our overall increase in sales. Selling, general and administrative expenses Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales increased 30 basis points during Fiscal 2019. The following table details selling, general and administrative expenses for Fiscal 2019 compared with Fiscal 2018: (in millions) Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 Percentage of Net Sales February 2, 2019 Percentage of Net Sales $ Variance % Change $1,462.5 339.1 214.4 86.1 35.4 20.1% $1,336.3 313.3 4.7 200.9 3.0 89.5 1.2 — 0.5 20.1% 4.7 3.0 1.4 — $126.2 25.8 13.5 (3.4) 35.4 9.4% 8.2 6.7 (3.8) N/A 90.7 1.2 78.7 1.2 12.0 15.2 Store related costs Product sourcing costs Corporate costs Marketing and strategy costs Favorable lease cost Other selling, general and administrative expenses Selling, general and administrative expenses $2,228.2 30.7% $2,018.7 30.4% $209.5 10.4% The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales was primarily driven by the reclassification of favorable lease cost from depreciation and amortization expense to selling, general and administrative expense as a result of adopting ASU 2016-02, which resulted in a 50 basis point increase. This increase was partially offset by a 20 basis point improvement in our national television advertising and direct marketing efforts. Store related costs remained consistent, due to a 10 basis point improvement in store occupancy costs, offset by a 10 basis point increase in store payroll. Costs related to debt amendments During Fiscal 2018, we recorded total estimated costs related to debt amendments of $2.5 million, primarily as a result of the repricing of our Term Loan Facility. During Fiscal 2019, we reversed $0.4 million of this estimated expense based on actual expenses incurred. 39 Depreciation and amortization Depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $210.7 million during Fiscal 2019, primarily related to the depreciation of fixed assets, compared with $217.9 million during Fiscal 2018, primarily related to the depreciation of fixed assets and the amortization of favorable leases. The decrease was primarily driven by the reclassification of favorable lease cost from depreciation and amortization expense to selling, general and administrative expense as a result of adopting ASU 2016-02, partially offset by our capital expenditures related to new and non-comparable stores. Impairment charges—long-lived assets Impairment charges related to long-lived assets were $4.3 million and $6.8 million during Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively. We recorded impairment charges related to store-level assets for two stores as well as the online store during Fiscal 2019, and eight stores during Fiscal 2018. Refer to Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Impairment Charges,” for further discussion. The recoverability assessment related to these store-level assets requires various judgments and estimates, including estimates related to future revenues, gross margin rates, store expenses and other assumptions. We base these estimates upon our past and expected future performance. We believe our estimates are appropriate in light of current market conditions. However, future impairment charges could be required if we do not achieve our current revenue or cash flow projections for each store. Other income, net Other income, net (consisting of stored value card breakage income, gains and losses on disposition of assets, gains and losses on insurance proceeds and other miscellaneous items) improved $5.5 million to $16.5 million during Fiscal 2019. The improvement in other income was primarily driven by gains on insurance recoveries. Loss on extinguishment of debt During Fiscal 2018, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1.8 million related to transactions associated with our Term Loan Facility and ABL Credit Agreement. Refer to Note 7, “Long Term Debt,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding our debt transactions. There were no debt extinguishments during Fiscal 2019. Interest expense Interest expense improved $5.2 million to $50.8 million. The improvement was primarily driven by the $150 million paydown and repricing of our Term Loan Facility during Fiscal 2018. Refer to Note 7, “Long Term Debt,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further details on our debt transactions. Our average interest rates and average balances related to our ABL Line of Credit and our Term Loan Facility for Fiscal 2019 compared with Fiscal 2018 are summarized in the table below: Average interest rate—ABL Line of Credit Average interest rate—Term Loan Facility Average balance—ABL Line of Credit (in millions) Average balance—Term Loan Facility (in millions)(a) (a) Excludes original issue discount 40 Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 3.7% 4.2% 3.4% 4.4% $ 81.5 $961.4 $ 83.9 $1,015.8 Income tax expense Income tax expense was $115.4 million for Fiscal 2019 compared with $92.8 million for Fiscal 2018. The effective tax rate was 19.9% related to pretax income of $580.5 million for Fiscal 2019, and 18.3% related to pretax income of $507.6 million for Fiscal 2018. The lower tax rate in the prior year was primarily related to the impact of the changes to New Jersey tax law enacted during the second quarter of Fiscal 2018. Net income We earned net income of $465.1 million during Fiscal 2019 compared with net income of $414.7 million for Fiscal 2018. This improvement was primarily driven by our improved gross margin dollars, partially offset by an increase in our selling, general and administrative expenses. Performance for Fiscal Year Ended February 2, 2019 (Fiscal 2018) Compared with Fiscal Year Ended February 3, 2018 (Fiscal 2017) For a discussion related to Fiscal 2018 performance compared to Fiscal 2017 performance, refer to Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019 (Fiscal 2018 10-K). Liquidity and Capital Resources Our ability to satisfy interest payment obligations on our outstanding debt will depend largely on our future performance which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors beyond our control. If we do not have sufficient cash flow to service interest payment obligations on our outstanding indebtedness, and if we cannot borrow or obtain equity financing to satisfy those obligations, our business and results of operations will be materially adversely affected. We cannot be assured that any replacement borrowing or equity financing could be successfully completed on terms similar to our current financing agreements, or at all. We believe that cash generated from operations, along with our existing cash and our ABL Line of Credit, will be sufficient to fund our expected cash flow requirements and planned capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months as well as the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurance that we would be able to offset declines in our comparable store sales with savings initiatives in the event that the economy declines. Cash Flows Cash Flows for Fiscal 2019 Compared with Fiscal 2018 We generated $275.5 million of cash flows during Fiscal 2019 compared with a use of $26.9 million during Fiscal 2018. Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $891.7 million and $639.7 million during Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively. The increase in our operating cash flows was primarily driven by our improved operating results and changes in working capital. Net cash used in investing activities was $324.6 million and $298.5 million during Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively. This change was primarily the result of an increase in capital expenditures related to a new distribution center and our store expenditures (new stores, remodels and other store expenditures). Net cash used in financing activities was $291.6 million during Fiscal 2019 compared to $368.1 million during Fiscal 2018. This change was primarily driven by an increase in the value of share repurchases, partially offset by a decrease in net payments on our debt and increased proceeds from stock option exercises. 41 Changes in working capital also impact our cash flows. Working capital equals current assets (exclusive of restricted cash) minus current liabilities. We had a working capital deficit at February 1, 2020 of $51.1 million compared with working capital of $2.3 million at February 2, 2019. The decrease in working capital was primarily related to our adoption of ASU 2016-02, which resulted in adding a portion of the new lease liability to current liabilities, as well as a decrease in merchandise inventories. This was partially offset by an increase in cash and a decrease in accounts payable. For a discussion of our cash flows for Fiscal 2018 compared to Fiscal 2017, refer to Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included in our Fiscal 2018 10-K. Capital Expenditures For Fiscal 2019, cash spend for capital expenditures, net of $56.3 million of landlord allowances and $5.1 million of insurance recoveries related to property and equipment, amounted to $268.9 million. These capital expenditures include approximately $140 million, net of the previously mentioned landlord allowances and insurance recoveries, for store expenditures (new stores, remodels and other store expenditures). In addition, we made capital expenditures of approximately $56 million to support our supply chain initiatives including a new distribution center, with the remaining capital to support information technology and other business initiatives. We incurred cash spend on capital expenditures of $253.7 million, net of approximately $50.8 million of landlord allowances and $2.8 million of insurance recoveries related to property and equipment, during Fiscal 2018. We estimate that we will spend approximately $400 million, net of approximately $30 million of landlord allowances, in capital expenditures during Fiscal 2020, including approximately $175 million, net of the previously mentioned landlord allowances, for store expenditures (new stores, remodels and other store expenditures). In addition, we estimate that we will spend approximately $80 million to support our supply chain initiatives, with the remaining capital used to support our information technology and other business initiatives. Share Repurchase Programs On August 15, 2018, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300 million of common stock, which was completed during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019. On August 14, 2019, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $400 million of common stock, which is authorized to be executed through August 2021.These repurchase programs are funded using our available cash and borrowings on our ABL Line of Credit. During Fiscal 2019, we repurchased 1,740,740 shares of common stock for $299.9 million, inclusive of commissions, under our share repurchase programs. As of February 1, 2020, we had $398.5 million remaining under our share repurchase authorizations. We are authorized to repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions under our repurchase programs. The timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on a variety of factors, including the market conditions as well as corporate and regulatory considerations. Our share repurchase program may be suspended, modified or discontinued at any time, and we have no obligation to repurchase any amount of our common stock under the programs. Dividends During the past two fiscal years, we have not declared, and do not anticipate declaring in the near term, dividends on shares of our common stock. We currently do, and intend to continue to, retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund all of the Company’s capital expenditures, business initiatives, and to support any 42 potential opportunistic capital structure initiatives. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon results of operations, financial condition, contractual restrictions, including those under our ABL Line of Credit and Term Loan Facility, any potential future indebtedness we may incur, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant. In addition, since we are a holding company, substantially all of the assets shown on our consolidated balance sheets are held by our subsidiaries. Accordingly, our earnings, cash flow and ability to pay dividends are largely dependent upon the earnings and cash flows of our subsidiaries and the distribution or other payment of such earnings to us in the form of dividends. Debt and Hedging As of February 1, 2020, our obligations include $957.5 million, inclusive of original issue discount, under our Term Loan Facility. We had no outstanding balance on our ABL Line of Credit as of February 1, 2020. Our debt obligations also include $50.1 million of finance lease obligations as of February 1, 2020. Refer to Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Long Term Debt,” for an overview of the terms and conditions of these instruments. Term Loan Facility At February 1, 2020, our borrowing rate related to the Term Loan Facility was 3.7%. On February 26, 2020, we completed a repricing of our Term Loan Facility, which among other things, reduced the interest rate margins applicable to our Term Loan Facility from 1.00% to 0.75%, in the case of prime rate loans, and from 2.00% to 1.75%, in the case of LIBOR loans, with the LIBOR floor continuing to be 0.00%. ABL Line of Credit At February 1, 2020, we had $501.8 million available under the ABL Line of Credit. The maximum borrowings under the ABL Line of Credit during Fiscal 2019 amounted to $255.0 million. Average borrowings during Fiscal 2019 amounted to $81.5 million at an average interest rate of 3.7%. Hedging We were hedged on $800 million of our Term Loan Facility through May 2019. On December 17, 2018, the Company entered into an interest rate swap contract, which was designated as a cash flow hedge. This interest rate swap, which hedges $450 million of our Term Loan Facility, became effective May 31, 2019 and matures December 29, 2023. 43 Certain Information Concerning Contractual Obligations The following table sets forth certain information regarding our obligations to make future payments under current contracts as of February 1, 2020: Payments Due By Period Total Less Than 1 Year 2-3 Years 4-5 Years Thereafter (in thousands) Debt obligations(1) Interest on debt obligations(2) Finance lease obligations(3) Operating lease obligations(4) Purchase obligations(5) Other(6) $ $ 961,415 210,944 74,068 3,308,058 921,242 848 44,728 6,057 435,535 921,242 848 — $ — $ 961,415 76,761 15,006 725,890 89,455 14,354 821,900 — — — — $ — — 38,651 1,324,733 — — Total $5,476,575 $1,408,410 $925,709 $1,779,072 $1,363,384 (1) Represents future principal payments on outstanding borrowings as of February 1, 2020. (2) Represents interest payments on (i) the outstanding balance of the Term Loan Facility, with an average interest rate of 4.2% during Fiscal 2019 and (ii) the average borrowings outstanding on our ABL Line of Credit during Fiscal 2019, with an average interest rate of 3.7% during Fiscal 2019. (3) Finance lease obligations include future interest payments. (4) Represents minimum rent payments for operating leases under the current terms. (5) Represents commitments to purchase goods that have not been received as of February 1, 2020. The table above excludes estimated commitments for services used in our business of up to $105 million over the next five years. (6) Represents severance payments in the normal course of business that are included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Our agreements with three former employees (including our former President and Chief Executive Officer) to pay their respective beneficiaries $1.0 million upon their deaths for a total of $3.0 million is not reflected in the table above because the timing of the payments is unpredictable. The table above excludes ASC Topic No. 740 “Income Taxes” (Topic No. 740) liabilities which represent uncertain tax positions related to temporary differences. The total Topic No. 740 liability was $20.1 million, inclusive of $12.0 million of interest and penalties included in our total Topic No. 740 liability neither of which is presented in the table above as we are not certain if and when these payments would be required. The table above excludes our irrevocable letters of credit guaranteeing payment and performance under certain leases, insurance contracts, debt agreements, merchandising agreements and utility agreements in the amount of $53.1 million as of February 1, 2020. As of February 1, 2020, insurance reserves amounted to $79.0 million. These amounts are excluded from the table above as we are not certain if and when these payments would be required. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. We believe there are several accounting policies that are critical to understanding our historical and future performance as these policies affect the reported amounts of revenues and other significant areas that involve management’s judgments and estimates. The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities; (ii) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements; and (iii) the reported amounts of 44 revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, inventories and insurance reserves. Historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances form the basis for making estimates and judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A critical accounting estimate meets two criteria: (1) it requires assumptions about highly uncertain matters and (2) there would be a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements from either using a different, although reasonable, amount within the range of the estimate in the current period or from reasonably likely period-to-period changes in the estimate. While there are a number of accounting policies, methods and estimates affecting our Consolidated Financial Statements as addressed in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” areas that are particularly critical and significant include: Revenue Recognition. While revenue recognition for the Company does not involve significant judgment, it represents an important accounting policy. We record revenue at the time control of goods are transferred to the customer, which we determine to be at point of sale and delivery of merchandise, net of allowances for estimated future returns, which is estimated based on historical return rates. We present sales, net of sales taxes, in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We account for layaway sales and leased department revenue in compliance with ASC Topic No. 606 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” Layaway sales are recognized upon delivery of merchandise to the customer. The amount of cash received upon initiation of the layaway is recorded as a deposit liability within the line item “Other current liabilities” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Stored value cards (gift cards and store credits issued for merchandise returns) are recorded as a liability at the time of issuance, and the related sale is recorded upon redemption. We estimate and recognize stored value card breakage income in proportion to actual stored value card redemptions and record such income in the line item “Other income, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Income. We determine an estimated stored value card breakage rate by continuously evaluating historical redemption data. Breakage income is recognized on a monthly basis in proportion to the historical redemption patterns for those stored value cards for which the likelihood of redemption is remote. Inventory. Our inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market using the retail inventory method. Under the retail inventory method, the valuation of inventory and the resulting gross margin are determined by applying a calculated cost to retail ratio to the retail value of inventory. The retail inventory method is an averaging method that results in valuing inventory at the lower of cost or market provided markdowns are taken timely to reduce the retail value of inventory. Inherent in the retail inventory method calculation are certain significant management judgments and estimates including merchandise markon, markups, markdowns and shortage, which significantly impact the ending inventory valuation as well as the resulting gross margin. Management believes that our retail inventory method provides an inventory valuation which approximates cost using a first-in, first-out assumption and results in carrying value at the lower of cost or market. We reserve for aged inventory based on historical trends and specific identification. Our aged inventory reserve contains uncertainties as the calculations require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment regarding a number of factors, including market conditions, the selling environment, historical results and current inventory trends. A 1% change in the dollar amount of retail markdowns would have resulted in an increase in markdown dollars, at cost, of approximately $3.0 million for Fiscal 2019. Typically, estimates are used to record inventory shortage at retail stores for the first three quarters of a fiscal year. Actual physical inventories are typically conducted annually during the second or fourth quarters to calculate actual shortage. While we make estimates on the basis of the best information available to us at the time the estimates are made, over accruals or under accruals of shortage may be identified as a result of the physical inventory counts, requiring adjustments. During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, we recorded shortage adjustments of $1.9 million, $1.9 million and $1.8 million, respectively, as a result of actual shortage being less than what we had estimated throughout the year. 45 Insurance Reserves. We have risk participation agreements with insurance carriers with respect to workers’ compensation, general liability insurance and health insurance. Pursuant to these arrangements, we are responsible for paying individual claims up to designated dollar limits. The amounts included in our costs related to these claims are estimated and can vary based on changes in assumptions or claims experience included in the associated insurance programs. For example, changes in legal trends and interpretations, as well as changes in the nature and method of how claims are settled, can impact ultimate costs. An increase in workers’ compensation claims by employees, health insurance claims by employees or general liability claims may result in a corresponding increase in our costs related to these claims. Insurance reserves amounted to $79.0 million and $70.9 million at February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Refer to Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and their impact in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Fluctuations in Operating Results We expect that our revenues and operating results may fluctuate from fiscal quarter to fiscal quarter or over the longer term. Certain of the general factors that may cause such fluctuations are discussed in Item 1A, Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report. Seasonality Our business, like that of most retailers, is subject to seasonal influences. In the second half of the year, which includes the back-to-school and holiday seasons, we generally realize a higher level of sales and net income. Weather is also a contributing factor to the sale of our clothing. Generally, our sales are higher if the weather is cold during the Fall and warm during the early Spring. Sales of cold weather clothing are increased by early cold weather during the Fall, while sales of warm weather clothing are improved by early warm weather conditions in the Spring. Although we have diversified our product offerings, we believe traffic to our stores is still driven, in part, by weather patterns. Inflation We do not believe that our operating results have been materially affected by inflation during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 or Fiscal 2017. Historically, as the costs of merchandising and related operating expenses have increased, we have been able to mitigate the effect of such impact on our operations. The U.S. retail industry continues to face increased pressure on margins as commodity prices increase and the overall challenging retail conditions have led consumers to be more value conscious. Our “open to buy” paradigm, in which we purchase both pre-season and in-season merchandise, allows us the flexibility to purchase less pre-season with the balance purchased in-season and opportunistically. It also provides us the flexibility to shift purchases between suppliers and categories. This enables us to obtain better terms with our suppliers, which we expect to help offset the expected rising costs of goods. Market Risk We are exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in interest rates. Our borrowings contain floating rate obligations and are subject to interest rate fluctuations. The objective of our financial risk management is to minimize the negative impact of interest rate fluctuations on our earnings and cash flows. We manage interest rate risk through the use of our interest rate cap contracts. As more fully described in Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” we enter into interest rate derivative contracts to manage interest rate risks associated with 46 our long term debt obligations. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in the line item “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. We continue to have exposure to interest rate risks to the extent they are not hedged. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Other than operating leases consummated in the normal course of business (prior to our adoption of ASU 2016-02) and letters of credit, as more fully described above under the caption “Certain Information Concerning Contractual Obligations,” we are not involved in any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future impact on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. As a result of adopting ASU 2016-02, our operating leases are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheet for Fiscal 2019. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing business operations. Primary exposures include changes in interest rates, as borrowings under our ABL Line of Credit and Term Loan Facility bear interest at floating rates based on LIBOR or the base rate, in each case plus an applicable borrowing margin. The interest rate of our Term Loan Facility is also dependent on the prime rate, and the federal funds rate as further discussed in Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, “Long Term Debt.” We manage our interest rate risk through the use of interest rate derivative contracts. For our floating-rate debt, interest rate changes generally impact our earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. On April 24, 2015, we entered into two interest rate cap contracts which were designated as cash flow hedges. These interest rate cap contracts had an aggregate notional principal amount of $800.0 million, cap rates of 1.0%, and matured on May 31, 2019. On December 17, 2018, we entered into an interest rate swap contract, which was designated as a cash flow hedge. This interest rate swap became effective on May 31, 2019. It has a notional principal amount of $450.0 million, a swap rate of 2.72%, and matures on December 29, 2023. On November 2, 2018, we completed a repricing of our Term Loan Facility, which among other things, reduced the interest rate margins applicable to our Term Loan Facility from 1.50% to 1.00%, in the case of prime rate loans, and from 2.50% to 2.00%, in the case of LIBOR loans, with the LIBOR floor being reduced from 0.75% to 0.00%. On February 26, 2020, we completed a repricing of our Term Loan Facility, which among other things, reduced the interest rate margins applicable to our Term Loan Facility from 1.00% to 0.75%, in the case of prime rate loans, and from 2.00% to 1.75%, in the case of LIBOR loans, with the LIBOR floor continuing to be 0.00%. We have unlimited interest rate risk related to borrowings on our variable rate debt in excess of the notional principal amount of our interest rate swap contract. At February 1, 2020, we had $961.4 million of floating-rate debt, exclusive of original issue discount. Based on $961.4 million outstanding as floating-rate debt, a one percentage point increase as of February 1, 2020 (after considering our interest rate swap contract), would cause an increase to cash interest expense of $5.2 million per year, resulting in $5.2 million less in our pre-tax earnings. This sensitivity analysis assumes our mix of financial instruments and all other variables will remain constant in future periods. These assumptions are made in order to facilitate the analysis and are not necessarily indicative of our future intentions. 47 If a one percentage point increase in interest rates were to occur as of February 1, 2020, such an increase would result in the following additional interest expenses (assuming current borrowing level remains constant): Floating Rate Debt Term Loan Facility(a) ABL Line of Credit (in millions) Principal Outstanding at February 1, 2020 Additional Interest Expense Q1 2020 Additional Interest Expense Q2 2020 Additional Interest Expense Q3 2020 Additional Interest Expense Q4 2020 $961.4 — $961.4 $ 1.3 — $ 1.3 $ 1.3 — $ 1.3 $ 1.3 — $ 1.3 $ 1.3 — $ 1.3 (a) Principal balance represents carrying value of our Term Loan Facility exclusive of original issue discount. Our ability to satisfy our interest payment obligations on our outstanding debt will depend largely on our future performance, which, in turn, is in part subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors beyond our control. If we do not have sufficient cash flow to service our interest payment obligations on our outstanding indebtedness and if we cannot borrow or obtain equity financing to satisfy those obligations, our business and results of operations will be materially adversely affected. We cannot be assured that any replacement borrowing or equity financing could be successfully completed. 48 Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Consolidated Financial Statements Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2020, February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2020, February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2020, February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2020, February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal years ended February 1, 2020, February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018 Page 50 53 54 55 56 57 58 49 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Burlington Stores, Inc. Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Burlington Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of February 1, 2020, and February 2, 2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 1, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of February 1, 2020, and February 2, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended February 1, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 13, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Change in Accounting Principle As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, effective February 3, 2019, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Update (ASU) 2016-12, Leases (Topic 842), using the alternative transition method, which does not require prior periods to be recast. See below for a critical audit matter related to the change in accounting principle. Basis for Opinion These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the US federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Critical Audit Matters The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our 50 opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate. Incremental Borrowing Rate Used in Adoption of Topic No. 842—Refer to Notes 1 and 2 to the financial statements (also see Change in Accounting Principle explanatory paragraph above) Critical Audit Matter Description The Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASU 2016-12 as of February 3, 2019. Accordingly, the Company recognized an operating lease liability of $2.1 billion based on the present value of its lease payments on the adoption date. The discount rates used in valuing the Company’s leases are not readily determinable and are based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate (IBR) on a fully collateralized basis. The determination of the IBRs required management to make significant estimates and assumptions as to its use of the retail industry yield curve, credit profile adjustment, and estimate of the impact of collateral. Given the determination of the IBRs required management to make significant estimates and assumptions relating to its use of the retail industry yield curve, credit profile adjustment, and estimate for the impact of collateral, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of such estimates and assumptions required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our valuation specialists. How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit Our audit procedures related to the IBRs that were used in the adoption of Topic 842 included the following: • We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s review of methodology, inputs, and assumptions used in the determination of the IBRs. • With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we evaluated the methods and assumptions used by management to determine the IBRs, tested the reasonableness of the inputs used, and tested the mathematical accuracy of the IBR model. Retail Inventory Method—Impact of Markdowns—Refer to Note 1 to the financial statements Critical Audit Matter Description The Company values merchandise inventories at the lower of cost or market using the retail inventory method. Under this method, the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins are determined by applying a calculated cost-to-retail ratio to the retail value of inventories. The retail inventory method is an averaging method that results in valuing inventory at the lower of cost or market provided markdowns are taken timely to reduce the retail value of inventory. Merchandise inventories as of February 1, 2020, were $777.2 million. The judgments involved in determining when to record markdowns can significantly impact the ending inventory valuation and the resulting gross profit. Given the significant judgments necessary to identify and record markdowns timely, performing audit procedures to evaluate the timeliness of markdowns involved a high degree of auditor judgment. How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit Our audit procedures related to the timing of markdowns taken included the following, among others: • We tested the effectiveness of controls over inventory valuation, specifically those over the determination and execution of markdowns. 51 • We made selections of markdowns recorded after year-end to determine if the selected markdowns should have been taken as of the year-end balance sheet date. • We made selections of markdowns recorded throughout the year to test the accuracy and timeliness of markdowns taken. • We developed an expectation for markdowns based on historical amounts recorded as a percentage of sales and compared our estimate to management’s recorded markdowns. Parsippany, New Jersey March 13, 2020 We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1983. 52 BURLINGTON STORES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (All amounts in thousands, except per share data) REVENUES: Net sales Other revenue Total revenue COSTS AND EXPENSES: Cost of sales Selling, general and administrative expenses Costs related to debt amendments Stock option modification expense Depreciation and amortization Impairment charges—long-lived assets Other income—net Loss on extinguishment of debt Interest expense Total costs and expenses Income before income tax expense Income tax expense Net income Net income per common share: Common stock—basic Common stock—diluted Weighted average number of common shares: Common stock—basic Common stock—diluted Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $7,261,243 25,155 $6,643,051 25,428 $6,084,766 25,277 7,286,398 6,668,479 6,110,043 4,228,740 2,228,178 (375) — 210,720 4,315 (16,531) — 50,826 3,868,119 2,018,737 2,496 — 217,884 6,844 (10,998) 1,823 55,990 3,559,158 1,863,501 2,262 142 201,103 2,127 (8,888) 2,881 58,777 6,705,873 6,160,895 5,681,063 580,525 115,409 507,584 92,839 428,980 44,128 $ 465,116 $ 414,745 $ 384,852 $ $ 7.05 6.91 $ $ 6.21 6.04 $ $ 5.64 5.48 65,943 67,293 66,812 68,679 68,286 70,288 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 53 BURLINGTON STORES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (All amounts in thousands) Net income Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: Interest rate derivative contracts: Net unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period Reclassification into earnings during the period Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax Total comprehensive income Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $465,116 $414,745 $384,852 (16,606) 1,259 (15,347) (3,080) 1,354 (1,726) 1,742 3,562 5,304 $449,769 $413,019 $390,156 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 54 BURLINGTON STORES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (All amounts in thousands, except share and per share data) ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Restricted cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable—net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $795 and $78, respectively Merchandise inventories Assets held for disposal Prepaid and other current assets Total current assets Property and equipment—net Operating lease assets Tradenames Favorable leases—net Goodwill Deferred tax assets Other assets Total assets LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable Current operating lease liabilities Other current liabilities Current maturities of long term debt Total current liabilities Long term debt Long term operating lease liabilities Other liabilities Deferred tax liabilities Commitments and contingencies (Note 17) Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: authorized: 50,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding Common stock, $0.0001 par value: Authorized: 500,000,000 shares; Issued: 79,882,506 shares and 79,224,669 shares, respectively; Outstanding: 65,929,972 shares and 67,145,097 shares, respectively Additional paid-in-capital Accumulated earnings (deficit) Accumulated other comprehensive loss Treasury stock, at cost Total stockholders’ equity Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 55 February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 $ 403,074 6,582 $ 112,274 21,882 91,508 777,248 2,261 136,698 1,417,371 1,403,173 2,397,111 238,000 731 47,064 4,678 85,731 58,752 954,183 — 124,809 1,271,900 1,253,705 — 238,000 164,324 47,064 4,361 99,818 $ 5,593,859 $3,079,172 $ 759,107 302,185 397,032 3,577 1,461,901 1,001,723 2,322,000 97,798 182,288 $ 848,561 — 396,257 2,924 1,247,742 983,643 — 346,298 178,779 — — 7 1,587,146 204,797 (18,960) (1,244,841) 7 1,508,996 (260,919) (3,613) (921,761) 528,149 322,710 $ 5,593,859 $3,079,172 BURLINGTON STORES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (All amounts in thousands) OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation and amortization Impairment charges—long-lived assets Amortization of deferred financing costs Accretion of long term debt instruments Deferred income taxes Non-cash loss on extinguishment of debt Non-cash stock compensation expense Non-cash lease expense Non-cash rent Cash received from landlord allowances Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable Merchandise inventories Prepaid and other current assets Accounts payable Other current liabilities Other long term assets and long term liabilities Other operating activities Net cash provided by operating activities INVESTING ACTIVITIES Cash paid for property and equipment Lease acquisition costs Proceeds from insurance recoveries related to property and equipment Proceeds from sale of property and equipment and assets held for sale Other investing activities Net cash (used in) investing activities FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from long term debt—ABL Line of Credit Principal payments on long term debt—ABL Line of Credit Proceeds from long term debt—Term B-5 Loans Principal payments on long term debt—Term B-5 Loans Principal payments on long term debt—Term B-4 Loans Purchase of treasury shares Proceeds from stock option exercises Deferred financing costs Other financing activities Net cash (used in) financing activities Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of period Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at end of period Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Interest paid Income tax payments—net Non-cash investing activities: Accrued purchases of property and equipment Acquisition of finance leases Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $ 465,116 $ 414,745 $ 384,852 210,720 4,315 1,247 813 9,070 — 43,928 12,599 — 56,280 (8,816) 176,430 (13,598) (90,899) 25,202 3,176 (3,858) 891,725 (328,357) (1,983) 5,131 — 611 (324,598) 1,294,400 (1,294,400) — — — (323,080) 34,222 — (2,769) (291,627) 275,500 134,156 409,656 47,071 110,588 62,814 19,875 $ $ $ $ $ 217,884 6,844 1,596 754 2,519 1,823 35,485 — (25,568) 50,843 3,482 (201,621) (7,461) 111,023 13,700 8,780 4,825 639,653 (295,772) (8,543) 2,787 6,020 (3,000) (298,508) 1,220,200 (1,220,200) — (152,793) — (228,874) 16,306 (2,439) (275) (368,075) (26,930) 161,086 134,156 52,173 75,650 47,258 13,538 $ $ $ $ $ 201,103 2,127 2,463 1,048 (30,727) 2,881 27,034 — (24,689) 48,834 (19,983) (50,671) (42,855) 97,003 2,509 (2,109) 8,430 607,250 (268,194) — 5,980 (3) 9 (262,208) 1,215,500 (1,215,500) 1,114,207 (2,793) (1,117,000) (289,777) 9,173 (1,188) (5,975) (293,353) 51,689 109,397 161,086 49,092 109,581 31,279 — $ $ $ $ See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 56 BURLINGTON STORES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) (All dollar amounts in thousands) Common Stock Paid-in Accumulated Additional Accumulated Other Comprehensive Treasury Stock Shares Amount Capital Deficit Loss Shares Amount Total $1,420,581 $(1,060,099) 384,852 Balance at January 28, 2017 Net income Stock options exercised Shares used for tax withholding Shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs Issuance of restricted shares, net of forfeitures of 33,263 restricted shares Stock based compensation Unrealized gains on interest rate cap contracts, net of related taxes of $1.7 million Amount reclassified into earnings, net of related taxes of $2.4 million Cumulative-effect adjustment Balance at February 3, 2018 Net income Stock options exercised Shares used for tax withholding Shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs Issuance of restricted shares, net of forfeitures of 25,504 restricted shares Stock based compensation Unrealized gains on interest rate cap contracts, net of related taxes of $1.2 million Amount reclassified into earnings, net of related taxes of $0.5 million Balance at February 2, 2019 Net income Stock options exercised Shares used for tax withholding Shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs Forfeiture of restricted shares, net of issuances of 1,759 restricted shares Stock based compensation Unrealized losses on interest rate 77,653,924 — 568,675 — — 199,348 — — — — 78,421,947 — 684,011 — — 118,711 — — — 79,224,669 — 710,964 — — $ 7 — — — — — — — — — 7 — — — — — — — — 7 — — — — — 9,173 — — — 27,034 — — 417 1,457,205 — 16,306 — — — 35,485 — — 1,508,996 — 34,222 — — (53,127) — — — — 43,928 — — — — — — — (417) (675,664) 414,745 — — — — — — — (260,919) 465,116 — — — — — — $ (7,191) — — — — — — 1,742 3,562 — (1,887) — — — — — — (3,080) 1,354 (3,613) — — — — — — (16,606) (7,473,211) $ (403,110) $ (49,812) — 384,852 9,173 — (7,307) (7,307) — — (70,291) (3,006,720) (282,470) (282,470) — — — — — — — — — — — 27,034 1,742 3,562 — (10,550,222) — — (69,489) (692,887) 86,774 — 414,745 16,306 — (10,127) (10,127) (1,459,861) (218,747) (218,747) — — — — — — — — — 35,485 (3,080) 1,354 (12,079,572) — — (132,222) (921,761) 322,710 — 465,116 34,222 — (23,200) (23,200) (1,740,740) (299,880) (299,880) — — — — — — — — 43,928 — (16,606) — — 1,259 600 derivative contracts, net of related taxes of $6.4 million Amount reclassified into earnings, net of related taxes of $0.5 million Cumulative-effect adjustment — — — — — — — — — — 600 1,259 — Balance at February 1, 2020 79,882,506 $ 7 $1,587,146 $ 204,797 $(18,960) (13,952,534) $(1,244,841) $ 528,149 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 57 BURLINGTON STORES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Business As of February 1, 2020, Burlington Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation (collectively with its subsidiaries, the Company), has expanded its store base to 727 retail stores, inclusive of an internet store, in 45 states and Puerto Rico. The Company sells in-season, fashion-focused merchandise at up to 60% off other retailers’ prices, including: women’s ready-to-wear apparel, menswear, youth apparel, baby, beauty, footwear, accessories, home, toys, gifts and coats. As of February 1, 2020, the Company operated stores under the names “Burlington Stores” (714 stores), “Cohoes Fashions” (2 stores), “Super Baby Depot” (2 stores), “MJM Designer Shoes” (8 stores) and 1 online store. Cohoes Fashions offers products similar to those offered by Burlington Stores. MJM Designer Shoes offers moderately priced designer and fashion shoes. The Super Baby Depot stores offer baby clothing, accessories, furniture and other merchandise in the middle to higher price range. Basis of Consolidation and Presentation The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Burlington Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Fiscal Years The Company defines its fiscal year as the 52 or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31. The fiscal years ended February 1, 2020 (Fiscal 2019) and February 2, 2019 (Fiscal 2018) each consisted of 52 weeks. The fiscal year ended February 3, 2018 (Fiscal 2017) consisted of 53 weeks. Use of Estimates Certain amounts included in the Consolidated Financial Statements are estimated based on historical experience, currently available information and management’s judgment as to the expected outcome of future conditions and circumstances. While every effort is made to ensure the integrity of such estimates, actual results could differ from these estimates, and such differences could have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Casualty Losses and Insurance Proceeds As a result of the effects of certain weather-related incidents, 82 of the Company’s stores were closed for at least one day during Fiscal 2017. The Company incurred losses during Fiscal 2017 of (i) $5.4 million related to the net book values of merchandise inventories and (ii) $17.7 million related to the net book values of property and equipment and other long-lived assets, as well as repair and maintenance costs related to the clean-up of its stores. These costs were recorded in the line items “Cost of sales” and “Selling general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended February 3, 2018. The Company was insured at the selling price of the inventory and at replacement costs for the property and equipment and other long-lived assets, less a deductible. During Fiscal 2017, the Company received approximately $11.7 million of insurance proceeds to offset some of the losses. The Company allocated $6.0 million of these proceeds to property and equipment, which is included in the line item “Proceeds from insurance recoveries related to property and equipment,” a component of cash flows from investing activities, on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows during the year ended February 3, 2018. 58 During Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, the Company received $12.5 million and $9.3 million, respectively, of insurance proceeds related to these incidents. These proceeds resulted in a gain on insurance recovery of $8.1 million and $3.3 million, which is included in “Other income – net” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively. The Company allocated $5.1 million and $2.8 million of these proceeds to property and equipment, which is included in the line item “Proceeds from insurance recoveries related to property and equipment,” a component of cash flows from investing activities, on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively. The Company also incurred losses during Fiscal 2019 of $3.1 million related to several stores that sustained damages and were temporarily closed during the year. These losses primarily relate to merchandise held at these stores, and the losses are included in the line item “Cost of sales” in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for Fiscal 2019. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents represent cash and short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase. Book cash overdrafts are included in the line item “Accounts payable” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable consist of credit card receivables, lease incentive receivables, insurance receivables and other receivables. Accounts receivable are recorded at net realizable value, which approximates fair value. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts for amounts deemed uncollectible. Inventories Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, as determined by the retail inventory method. Under the retail inventory method, the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins are calculated by applying a calculated cost to retail ratio to the retail value of inventories. The Company regularly records a provision for estimated shortage, thereby reducing the carrying value of merchandise inventory. Complete physical inventories of all of the Company’s stores and warehouses are performed no less frequently than annually, with the recorded amount of merchandise inventory being adjusted to coincide with these physical counts. The Company records its cost of merchandise (net of purchase discounts and certain vendor allowances), certain merchandise acquisition costs (primarily commissions and import fees), inbound freight, outbound freight from distribution centers, and freight on internally transferred merchandise in the line item “Cost of sales” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Costs associated with the Company’s distribution, buying, and store receiving functions (product sourcing costs) are included in the line items “Selling, general and administrative expenses” and “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Product sourcing costs included within the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” amounted to $339.1 million, $313.3 million and $283.6 million during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, respectively. Depreciation and amortization related to the distribution and purchasing functions for the same periods amounted to $31.9 million, $30.5 million and $26.6 million, respectively. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 20 to 40 years for buildings, depending upon the 59 expected useful life of the facility, and 3 to 15 years for store fixtures and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lease term, including any reasonably assured renewal options or the expected economic life of the improvement, whichever is less. Repairs and maintenance expenditures are expensed as incurred. Renewals and betterments, which significantly extend the useful lives of existing property and equipment, are capitalized. Assets recorded under capital leases are recorded at the present value of minimum lease payments and are amortized over the lease term. Amortization of assets recorded as capital leases is included in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The carrying value of all long-lived assets is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, in accordance with ASC Topic No. 360 “Property, Plant, and Equipment” (Topic No. 360). The Company recorded impairment charges related to property and equipment of $3.4 million, $3.9 million and $1.1 million during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, respectively. These charges are recorded in the line item “Impairment charges—long-lived assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Refer to Note 6, “Impairment Charges,” for further discussion of the Company’s measurement of impairment of long-lived assets. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted pre-tax future net cash flows expected to be generated by that asset. If the undiscounted future cash flows are not adequate to recover the carrying value of the asset, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of such assets. Refer to Note 6, “Impairment Charges,” for further discussion of the Company’s measurement of impairment of long-lived assets. Capitalized Computer Software Costs The Company accounts for capitalized software in accordance with ASC Topic No. 350 “Intangibles— Goodwill and Other” (Topic No. 350) which requires the capitalization of certain costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining software for internal use. The Company capitalized $18.0 million and $15.7 million relating to these costs during Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively. Intangible Assets The Company accounts for intangible assets in accordance with Topic No. 350. The Company’s intangible assets primarily represent tradenames and favorable lease positions. The tradename asset “Burlington” is expected to generate cash flows indefinitely and, therefore, is accounted for as an indefinite-lived asset not subject to amortization. The values of favorable and unfavorable lease positions are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease terms. Amortization of net favorable lease positions is included in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company evaluates its intangible assets for possible impairment as follows: Indefinite-lived intangible assets: The Company tests identifiable intangible assets with an indefinite life for impairment on an annual basis, or when a triggering event occurs, relying on a number of factors that include operating results, business plans and projected future cash flows. The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset with its carrying amount. The Company determines fair value through the relief of royalty method which is a widely accepted valuation technique. On the first business day of the second quarter, the Company’s annual assessment date, the Company performed a quantitative analysis and determined that the fair values of each of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets are greater than their respective carrying values. There were no impairment charges recorded during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 or Fiscal 2017 related to indefinite-lived intangible assets. 60 Finite-lived intangible assets: Identifiable intangible assets that are subject to amortization are evaluated for impairment in accordance with Topic No. 360 using a process similar to that used to evaluate other long-lived assets as described in Note 6, “Impairment Charges.” An impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. The Company recorded impairment charges of $2.9 million and $0.8 million related to finite-lived intangible assets during Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, respectively. There were no impairment charges related to finite-lived intangible assets during Fiscal 2019. These charges are recorded in the line item “Impairment charges–long-lived assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Refer to Note 6, “Impairment Charges,” for further discussion of the Company’s measurement of impairment of long-lived assets. Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition cost over the estimated fair value of tangible assets and other identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed. Topic No. 350 requires a comparison, at least annually, of the carrying value of the assets and liabilities associated with a reporting unit, including goodwill, with the fair value of the reporting unit. The Company determines fair value through multiple widely accepted valuation techniques. These techniques use a variety of assumptions including projected market conditions, discount rates and future cash flows. If the carrying value of the assets and liabilities exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, the Company would calculate the implied fair value of its reporting unit goodwill as compared with the carrying value of its reporting unit goodwill to determine the appropriate impairment charge. On the first business day of the second fiscal quarter, the Company’s annual assessment date, the Company performed a quantitative analysis and determined that the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit was greater than its carrying value. There were no impairment charges related to goodwill during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 or Fiscal 2017. Other Assets Other assets consist primarily of landlord-owned store assets that the Company has paid for as part of its lease and deferred financing costs associated with the Company’s senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the ABL Line of Credit). Landlord-owned assets represent leasehold improvements at certain stores for which the Company has paid and derives a benefit, but the landlord has retained title. These assets are amortized over the lease term inclusive of reasonably assured renewal options. Amortization of landlord-owned assets was $14.6 million, $16.0 million and $14.5 million, during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, respectively, and was included in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Deferred financing costs are amortized over the life of the ABL Line of Credit using the interest method of amortization. Amortization of deferred financing costs is recorded in the line item “Interest expense” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Other assets also included purchased lease rights as of February 2, 2019. As a result of adopting Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, “Leases” (ASU 2016-02), purchased lease rights are now included in the line item “Operating lease assets” as of February 1, 2020. Other Current Liabilities Other current liabilities primarily consist of sales tax payable, customer liabilities, accrued payroll costs, self-insurance reserves, accrued operating expenses, payroll taxes payable and other miscellaneous items. Additionally, the current portion of straight line rent liability was included in other current liabilities as of February 2, 2019. As a result of adopting ASU 2016-02, the current portion of straight line rent liability is included in the line item “Current operating lease liabilities” as of February 1, 2020. Customer liabilities totaled $32.1 million and $33.7 million as of February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively. The Company has risk participation agreements with insurance carriers with respect to workers’ compensation, general liability insurance and health insurance. Pursuant to these arrangements, the Company is 61 responsible for paying individual claims up to designated dollar limits. The amounts related to these claims are estimated and can vary based on changes in assumptions or claims experience included in the associated insurance programs. An increase in workers’ compensation claims, health insurance claims or general liability claims may result in a corresponding increase in costs related to these claims. Self-insurance reserves as of February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019 were: Short-term self-insurance reserve(a) Long-term self-insurance reserve(b) Total (in thousands) Fiscal Years Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 $34,817 44,137 $78,954 $29,918 40,975 $70,893 (a) Represents the portions of the self-insurance reserve expected to be paid in the next twelve months, which were recorded in the line item “Other current liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. (b) Represents the portions of the self-insurance reserve expected to be paid in excess of twelve months, which was recorded in the line item “Other liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Other Liabilities As of February 1, 2020, other liabilities primarily consist of the long term portion of self-insurance reserves and tax liabilities associated with the uncertain tax positions recognized by the Company in accordance with ASC Topic No. 740 “Income Taxes” (Topic No. 740). As of February 2, 2019, other liabilities primarily consist of deferred lease incentives, the long term portion of straight line rent liability, the long term portion of self- insurance reserves and tax liabilities associated with the uncertain tax positions recognized by the Company in accordance with Topic No. 740. Deferred lease incentives are funds received or receivable from landlords used primarily to offset the costs incurred for leasehold improvements and for new and remodeled stores. These deferred lease incentives are amortized over the expected lease term, including rent holiday periods and option periods where the exercise of the option can be reasonably assured. Amortization of deferred lease incentives is included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. As of February 2, 2019, deferred lease incentives included in the line item “Other liabilities” were $216.2 million. As a result of adoption of ASU 2016-02, deferred lease incentives are included in the line item “Operating lease assets” as of February 1, 2020. Revenue Recognition The Company records revenue at the time control of the goods are transferred to the customer, which the Company determines to be at point of sale and delivery of merchandise, net of allowances for estimated future returns, which is estimated based on historical return rates. The Company presents sales, net of sales taxes, in its Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company accounts for layaway sales and leased department revenue in compliance with ASC Topic No. 606 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic No. 606). Layaway sales are recognized upon delivery of merchandise to the customer. The amount of cash received upon initiation of the layaway is recorded as a deposit liability in the line item “Other current liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Stored value cards (gift cards and store credits issued for merchandise returns) are recorded as a liability at the time of issuance, and the related sale is recorded upon redemption. The Company determines an estimated stored value card breakage rate by continuously evaluating historical redemption data. Breakage income is recognized monthly in proportion to the historical redemption patterns for those stored value cards for which the likelihood of redemption is remote. 62 Other Revenue Other revenue consists of service fees (layaway, shipping and handling, alteration, dormancy and other service charges), subleased rental income and rental income from leased departments as shown in the table below: Service fees Subleased rental income and other Rental income from leased departments Total (in thousands) Fiscal Years Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 $16,051 9,104 — $25,155 $15,836 9,319 273 $25,428 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $16,207 8,846 224 $25,277 Rental income from leased departments resulted from arrangements at some of the Company’s stores where the Company granted unaffiliated third parties the right to use designated store space solely for the purpose of selling such third parties’ goods, including such items as fragrances and designer handbags. Rental income was based on an agreed upon percentage of the lease departments’ total revenues. The Company did not own or have any rights to any tradenames, licenses or other intellectual property in connection with the brands sold by such unaffiliated third parties. The Company no longer has any such arrangements as of the end of Fiscal 2019. Private Label Credit Card The Company has a private label credit card program, in which customers earn reward points for purchases made using the card. The Company reduces net sales for the dollar value of any points earned at the time of the initial transaction, and subsequently recognizes net sales at the time the points are redeemed or expired. The Company receives royalty revenue based on a percentage of all purchases made on the card, which is recognized at the time of the initial transaction. The Company also receives a fee for each card activated. Revenue from activation fees are deferred and amortized over the period the Company performs its obligations under the card to the customer. Advertising Costs The Company’s advertising costs consist primarily of national television, direct mail and digital costs. Advertising costs are expensed the first time the advertising takes place, and are included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. During Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, advertising costs were $74.6 million, $77.1 million and $82.3 million, respectively. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Topic No. 740. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and such amounts as measured by tax laws. A valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, management is required to make assumptions and to apply judgment, including forecasting future earnings, taxable income, and the mix of earnings in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Management periodically assesses the need for a valuation allowance based on the Company’s current and anticipated results of operations. The need for and the amount of a valuation allowance can change in the near term if operating results and projections change significantly. 63 Topic No. 740 requires the recognition in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements of the impact of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, if that position is “more likely than not” to be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. The Company records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of income taxes. Other Income, Net Other income, net, consists of breakage income, gains and losses on insurance proceeds, interest income, net gains and losses on disposition of assets, and other miscellaneous items. During Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, the Company recognized $3.6 million, $4.2 million and $3.3 million, respectively, of breakage income. The Company recognized an $8.1 million and $3.3 million gain on insurance recoveries during Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively. There was no gain on insurance recovery during Fiscal 2017. The Company also recognized $2.1 million and $2.5 million during Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, respectively, related to the sale of certain state tax credits. There were no sales of tax credits during Fiscal 2019. Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and the effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges, less amounts reclassified into earnings. Lease Accounting The Company leases store locations, distribution centers and office space used in its operations. Beginning in Fiscal 2019, as a result of adopting ASU 2016-02, the Company accounts for these types of leases in accordance with ASC Topic No. 842, “Leases” (Topic No. 842), which requires that leases be evaluated and classified as operating or finance leases for financial reporting purposes. The lease liability is calculated as the present value of the remaining future lease payments over the lease term, including reasonably assured renewal options. The discount rates used in valuing the Company’s leases are not readily determinable, and are based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate on a fully collateralized basis. In calculating its incremental borrowing rate, the Company uses a retail industry yield curve, adjusted for the Company’s credit profile. The right-of-use asset for operating leases is based on the lease liability adjusted for the reclassification of certain balance sheet amounts, such as favorable leases, the long term portion of straight line rent liability, purchased lease rights, unamortized initial direct costs, impairment of the right-of-use asset and unamortized landlord allowances. The Company’s operating lease cost, included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on its Consolidated Statement of Income, includes amortization of right-of-use assets, interest on lease liabilities, as well as any variable and short-term lease cost. The Company commences recording operating lease cost when the underlying asset is made available for use. Assets held under finance leases are included in the line item “Property and equipment—net of accumulated depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Stock-Based Compensation The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic No. 718, “Stock Compensation” (Topic No. 718), which requires companies to record stock compensation expense for all non-vested and new awards beginning as of the grant date. Refer to Note 12, “Stock-Based Compensation,” for further details. 64 Net Income Per Share Net income per share is calculated using the treasury stock method. Refer to Note 11, “Net Income Per Share,” for further details. Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents and investments. The Company manages the credit risk associated with cash equivalents and investments by investing with high-quality institutions and, by policy, limiting investments only to those which meet prescribed investment guidelines. The Company maintains cash accounts that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses from maintaining cash accounts in excess of such limits. Management believes that it is not exposed to any significant risks on its cash and cash equivalent accounts. Segment Information The Company reports segment information in accordance with ASC Topic No. 280 “Segment Reporting.” The Company has one reportable segment. The Company is an off-price retailer that offers customers a complete line of value-priced apparel, including: women’s ready-to-wear apparel, accessories, footwear, menswear, youth apparel, baby, home, coats, beauty, toys and gifts. Sales percentage by major product category is as follows: Category Fiscal 2019(a) Fiscal 2018(a) Fiscal 2017(a) 22% 22% 20% 16% 15% 5% 23% 22% 20% 16% 15% 5% 23% 22% 20% 16% 14% 5% Women’s ready-to-wear apparel Accessories and footwear Menswear Youth apparel/baby Home Coats (a) Percentages may not foot due to rounding. 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted Accounting Standards Leases In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2016-02. The standard’s core principle is to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The Company adopted this ASU as of the beginning of Fiscal 2019. The Company applied the changes from the new guidance at the adoption date and recognized a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings in the period of adoption, as allowed under ASU 2018-11, “Leases: Targeted Improvements.” The Company did not adjust prior periods. The Company made an accounting policy election not to capitalize leases with an initial term of twelve months or less. The Company elected the transition package of practical expedients, which allows the Company to carry forward for its existing leases: (i) the historical lease classification as either operating or capital; (ii) assessment of whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases; and (iii) capitalization of initial direct costs. Additionally, the Company elected the practical expedients to not separate lease and non-lease components for both its real estate and non-real estate leases, to not assess whether existing or expired land easements contain a lease, and to employ hindsight when determining lease terms for existing leases on the date of adoption. 65 At adoption of this standard, the Company recognized approximately $2.1 billion of additional right-of-use assets and approximately $2.2 billion of additional lease liabilities (current and long-term combined) on its Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 3, 2019. The lease liability for operating leases is based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for operating leases is based on the lease liability adjusted for the reclassification of certain balance sheet amounts such as favorable leases, the long term portion of straight line rent liability, purchased lease rights, unamortized initial direct costs, impairment of the right-of-use asset and unamortized landlord allowances. In addition, the Company also recorded an approximate $0.6 million cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings, related to a deferred gain on a previous sale- leaseback transaction that was being recognized into the line item “Other income” over a 13 year period. Adoption of this standard also resulted in a change in the timing of certain expense recognition, primarily related to net favorable lease cost, as well as a reclassification of favorable lease cost from “Depreciation and amortization” to “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended February 1, 2020. This guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s liquidity. Refer to Note 3, “Lease Commitments,” for further detail of the Company’s future minimum lease payments. Pending Accounting Standards Intangible Assets On January 26, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which aims to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, goodwill impairment will be measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The new guidance will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of the fiscal year ending January 30, 2021 (Fiscal 2020). Early adoption is permitted for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software: Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract.” This ASU requires that implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract be assessed in accordance with the existing guidance in Subtopic 350-40, “Internal-Use Software.” Accordingly, costs incurred during the preliminary project stage must be expensed as incurred, while costs incurred during the application development stage must be capitalized. Capitalized implementation costs associated with a hosting arrangement that is a service contract must be expensed over the term of the hosting arrangement. Additionally, the new guidance requires that the expense of these capitalized costs be presented in the same line item in the statement of income as the fees associated with the hosting element of the arrangement. The new guidance will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods. This ASU will be effective for the Company as of the beginning of Fiscal 2020. Early adoption is permitted for annual or interim periods. The Company does not anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements. There were no other new accounting standards that had a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements during the year ended February 1, 2020, and there were no other new accounting standards or pronouncements that were issued but not yet effective as of February 1, 2020 that the Company expects to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations upon becoming effective. 66 3. Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents At February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, restricted cash and cash equivalents consisted of $6.6 million and $21.9 million, respectively, related to collateral for certain insurance contracts. The Company has the ability to convert the restricted cash to a letter of credit at any time, which would reduce available borrowings on the ABL Line of Credit by a like amount. 4. Property and Equipment Property and equipment consist of: Land Buildings Store fixtures and equipment Software Leasehold improvements Construction in progress Total property and equipment at cost Less: accumulated depreciation Total property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization Useful Lives N/A 20 to 40 Years 3 to 15 Years 3 to 10 Years Shorter of lease term or useful life N/A (in thousands) February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 $ 149,426 491,389 1,030,646 273,674 $ 156,040 485,265 927,081 256,610 761,561 58,759 694,145 24,767 2,765,455 (1,362,282) 2,543,908 (1,290,203) $ 1,403,173 $ 1,253,705 As of February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, assets, net of accumulated amortization of $4.4 million and $23.2 million, respectively, held under finance leases amounted to approximately $44.8 million and $30.3 million, respectively, and are included in the line item “Buildings” in the foregoing table. Amortization expense related to finance leases is included in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The total amount of depreciation expense during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017 was $195.8 million, $175.8 million and $163.3 million, respectively. During Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, the Company recorded impairment charges related to property and equipment of $3.4 million, $3.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively. Refer to Note 6, “Impairment Charges,” for further discussion. Internally developed software is amortized on a straight line basis over three to ten years and is recorded in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Depreciation and amortization of internally developed software amounted to $17.9 million, $19.4 million and $18.2 million during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, respectively. 67 5. Intangible Assets Intangible assets at February 1, 2020 consist primarily of tradenames. Intangible assets at February 2, 2019 consisted primarily of tradenames and favorable lease positions. As a result of adopting ASU 2016-02, most of the Company’s favorable lease positions are included in “Operating lease assets” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 1, 2020. (in thousands) February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Amount Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Amount $238,000 $ — $238,000 $238,000 $ — $238,000 $ 3,506 $(2,775) $ 731 $420,537 $(256,213) $164,324 Tradenames Favorable leases Favorable Leases The total amount of net favorable lease amortization during Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017 was $26.1 million and $23.3 million, respectively, and was included in “Depreciation and amortization” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. As a result of adopting ASU 2016-02, amortization of favorable leases is part of operating lease cost, included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for Fiscal 2019. The Company recorded impairment charges of $2.9 million and $0.8 million related to its favorable leases during Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, respectively. 6. Impairment Charges Impairment charges recorded during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017 amounted to $4.3 million, $6.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and are primarily related to declines in revenues and operating results of the respective stores. Additionally, during Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, a portion of the impairment related to a decline in the appraised fair value of one of the Company’s owned stores. Impairment charges during these periods related to the following: Asset Categories Land Operating lease assets Buildings Store fixtures and equipment Leasehold improvements Favorable leases Other assets Total (in thousands) Fiscal Years Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $1,604 921 921 809 52 — 8 $4,315 $1,551 — 1,262 878 195 2,894 64 $6,844 $ 247 — 227 308 306 836 203 $2,127 The Company recorded impairment charges related to store-level assets for two stores, as well as the online store, during Fiscal 2019, eight stores during Fiscal 2018 and four stores during Fiscal 2017. Long-lived assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for purposes of calculating impairment using the fair value hierarchy of ASC Topic No. 820 “Fair Value Measurements” (Topic No. 820). Refer to Note 16, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” for further discussion of the Company’s fair value hierarchy. The 68 fair value of the Company’s long-lived assets is calculated using a discounted cash-flow model that used level 3 inputs. In calculating future cash flows, the Company makes estimates regarding future operating results based on its experience and knowledge of market factors in which the retail location is located. The table below sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the remaining fair value of the two impaired stores as of February 1, 2020: (in thousands) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Un- Observable Inputs (Level 3) Land Operating lease assets Operating lease liabilities Buildings Store fixtures and equipment Leasehold improvements Other assets Total 7. Long Term Debt Long term debt consists of: $— — — — — — — $— $— — — — — — — $— $1,200,000 senior secured term loan facility (Term B-5 Loans), LIBOR (with a floor of 0.00%) plus 2.00%, matures on November 17, 2024 $600,000 ABL senior secured revolving facility, LIBOR plus spread based on average outstanding balance, matures on June 29, 2023 Finance lease obligations Unamortized deferred financing costs Total debt Less: current maturities Long term debt, net of current maturities Term Loan Facility Total $1,450 132 (125) 833 148 4 7 $1,450 132 (125) 833 148 4 7 $2,449 $2,449 (in thousands) February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 $ 957,505 $956,693 — 50,130 (2,335) — 32,706 (2,832) 1,005,300 (3,577) 986,567 (2,924) $1,001,723 $983,643 On February 24, 2011, the Company entered into a $1.0 billion senior secured term loan facility (the Term Loan Facility). The Term Loan Facility was issued pursuant to a credit agreement (Term Loan Credit Agreement), dated February 24, 2011, among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, an indirect subsidiary of the Company (BCFWC), the guarantors signatory thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent, the lenders party thereto, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, as joint bookrunners, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint arrangers, governing the terms of the Term Loan Facility. On November 17, 2017, BCFWC entered into Amendment No. 6 (the Sixth Amendment) to the Term Loan Credit Agreement governing its Term Loan Facility. The Sixth Amendment, among other things, reduced the interest rate margins applicable to the Term Loan Facility from 1.75% to 1.50% in the case of prime rate loans, 69 and from 2.75% to 2.50% in the case of LIBOR loans, with the LIBOR floor continuing to be 0.75%. The Sixth Amendment also extended the maturity date from August 13, 2021 to November 17, 2024. The Sixth Amendment was accomplished by replacing the outstanding $1,117.0 million principal amount of Term B-4 Loans with a like aggregate principal amount of Term B-5 Loans. In accordance with ASC Topic No. 470-50, “Debt Modifications and extinguishments” (Topic No. 470), the Company recognized a non-cash loss on the extinguishment of debt of $2.9 million, representing the write-off of $1.5 million and $1.4 million in deferred financing costs and unamortized original issue discount, respectively, which was recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Also in connection with the Sixth Amendment, the Company incurred fees of $2.3 million, primarily related to legal and placement fees, which were recorded in the line item “Costs related to debt amendments” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. In June 2018, the Company prepaid $150.0 million on the Term Loan Facility, which offset the mandatory quarterly payments through November 17, 2024. In accordance with Topic No. 470, the Company recognized a non-cash loss on the extinguishment of debt of $1.2 million, representing the write-off of unamortized original issue discount and deferred financing costs, which was recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. On November 2, 2018, BCFWC entered into Amendment No. 7 (the Seventh Amendment) to the Term Loan Credit Agreement governing its Term Loan Facility. The Seventh Amendment, among other things, reduced the interest rate margins applicable to the Company’s term loan facility from 1.50% to 1.00%, in the case of prime rate loans, and from 2.50% to 2.00%, in the case of LIBOR loans, with the LIBOR floor being reduced from 0.75% to 0.00%. In connection with the execution of the Seventh Amendment, the Company paid fees and expenses, including a fee to each consenting lender equal to 0.125% of the aggregate principal amount of such lender’s loans under the Term Loan Credit Agreement. In accordance with Topic No. 470, the Company recognized a non-cash loss on the extinguishment of debt of $0.5 million, representing the write-off of deferred financing costs and unamortized original issue discount, which was recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. Also in connection with the Seventh Amendment, the Company incurred fees of $2.4 million, primarily related to legal and placement fees, which were recorded in the line item “Costs related to debt amendments” in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. The Term Loan Facility is collateralized by a first lien on our favorable leases, real estate and property & equipment and a second lien on our inventory and receivables. Interest rates for the Term Loan Facility are based on: (i) for LIBOR rate loans for any interest period, at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (x) the LIBOR rate, as determined by the Term Loan Facility Administrative Agent, for such interest period multiplied by the Statutory Reserve Rate (as defined in the Term Loan Credit Agreement), and (y) 0.00% (the Term Loan Adjusted LIBOR Rate), plus an applicable margin; and (ii) for prime rate loans, a rate per annum equal to the highest of (a) the variable annual rate of interest then announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. at its head office as its “prime rate,” (b) the federal reserve bank of New York rate in effect on such date plus 0.50% per annum, and (c) the Term Loan Adjusted LIBOR Rate for the applicable class of term loans for one-month plus 1.00%, plus, in each case, an applicable margin. As of February 1, 2020, the Company’s borrowing rate related to the Term Loan Facility was 3.7%. Subsequent Event On February 26, 2020, the Company entered into Amendment No. 8 (the Eighth Amendment) to the Term Loan Credit Agreement governing its Term Loan Facility. The Eighth Amendment, among other things, reduced the interest rate margins applicable to the Term Loan Facility from 1.00% to 0.75%, in the case of prime rate loans, and from 2.00% to 1.75%, in the case of LIBOR loans, with the LIBOR floor remaining at 0.00%. In connection with the execution of the Eighth Amendment, the Company incurred fees of $1.1 million, primarily related to legal and placement fees. 70 ABL Line of Credit On June 29, 2018, BCFWC entered into Amendment No. 2 (the Second Amendment) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 2, 2011 (the ABL Credit Agreement), governing BCFWC’s existing senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the ABL Line of Credit). The Second Amendment, among other things, extended the maturity date from August 13, 2019 to June 29, 2023 and adjusted the pricing grid such that the lower interest rate of 1.25% in the case of LIBOR loans and 0.25% in the case of prime rate loans is applicable so long as the Company maintains at least 40% average daily availability (as opposed to 50%). In connection with its entry into the Second Amendment, and in accordance with Topic No. 470, the Company recognized a non-cash loss on the extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million, representing the write-off of deferred financing costs, which was recorded in the line item “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended February 2, 2019. The aggregate amount of commitments under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, supplemented and otherwise modified, the Amended ABL Credit Agreement) is $600.0 million (subject to a borrowing base limitation) and, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, the Company can increase the aggregate amount of commitments up to $900.0 million. The interest rate margin applicable under the Amended ABL Credit Agreement in the case of loans drawn at LIBOR is 1.25% - 1.50% (based on total commitments or borrowing base availability), and the fee on the average daily balance of unused loan commitments is 0.20%. Prior to the Second Amendment, the ABL Line of Credit was collateralized by a first lien on the Company’s inventory and receivables and a second lien on the Company’s real estate and property and equipment. In connection with the Second Amendment, the agent and lenders under the ABL Line of Credit agreed to release their second liens on the Company’s real estate, but retained their liens on the Company’s inventory, receivables, and equipment. The Company believes that the Amended ABL Credit Agreement provides the liquidity and flexibility to meet its operating and capital requirements over the remaining term of the ABL Line of Credit. Further, the calculation of the borrowing base under the Amended ABL Credit Agreement has been amended to allow for increased availability, particularly during the September 1st through December 15th period of each year. At February 1, 2020, the Company had $501.8 million available under the ABL Line of Credit. The maximum borrowings under the facility during Fiscal 2019 amounted to $255.0 million. Average borrowings during Fiscal 2019 amounted to $81.5 million at an average interest rate of 3.7%. At February 2, 2019, the Company had $543.3 million available under the ABL Line of Credit. The maximum borrowings under the facility during Fiscal 2018 amounted to $265.0 million. Average borrowings during Fiscal 2018 amounted to $83.9 million at an average interest rate of 3.4%. Deferred Financing Costs The Company had $2.5 million and $3.4 million in deferred financing costs associated with its ABL Line of Credit, which are recorded in the line item “Other assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively. In addition, The Company had $2.3 million and $2.8 million of deferred financing costs associated with its Term Loan Facility recorded in the line item “Long term debt” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively. Amortization of deferred financing costs amounted to $1.2 million, $1.6 million and $2.5 million during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, respectively, which was included in the line item “Interest expense” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. 71 Amortization expense related to the deferred financing costs as of February 1, 2020 for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter is estimated to be as follows: Fiscal Years 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter Total (in thousands) $1,216 1,216 1,216 807 384 — $4,839 Deferred financing costs have a weighted average amortization period of approximately 4.1 years. Scheduled Maturities Scheduled maturities of the Company’s long term debt obligations, as they exist as of February 1, 2020, in each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows: Fiscal Years: 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter Total Less: unamortized discount Less: unamortized deferred financing costs Long term finance lease liabilities Long term debt (in thousands) Long- Term Debt $ — — — — 961,415 — 961,415 (3,910) (2,335) 46,553 $1,001,723 8. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities The Company accounts for derivatives and hedging activities in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (Topic No. 815). Topic No. 815 provides the disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedging activities with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how the entity accounts for derivative instruments and related hedged items, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Further, qualitative disclosures are required that explain the Company’s objectives and strategies for using derivatives, as well as quantitative disclosures about the fair value of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative instruments. As required by Topic No. 815, the Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value and adjusts them to market on a quarterly basis. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging 72 relationship and apply hedge accounting, and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risk, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting. The Company uses interest rate cap contracts and interest rate swap contracts to manage interest rate risk. The fair value of these contracts are determined using the market standard methodology of discounted future variable cash flows. The variable cash flows of the interest rate cap contracts are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates rise above the strike rate of the caps in conjunction with the cash payments related to financing the premium of the interest rate caps. The variable cash flows of the interest rate swap contract are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates rise or fall compared to current levels in conjunction with the fixed cash payments. The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the cap and swap contracts are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities. In addition, to comply with the provisions of Topic No. 820, credit valuation adjustments, which consider the impact of any credit enhancements to the contracts, are incorporated in the fair values to account for potential nonperformance risk. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered any applicable credit enhancements such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees. In accordance with Topic No. 820, the Company made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio. There is no impact of netting because the Company’s only derivatives are interest rate cap contracts and interest rate swap contracts that are with separate counterparties and are under separate master netting agreements. Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. However, as of February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall valuation of its derivative portfolios. As a result, the Company classifies its derivative valuations in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company’s known or expected cash payments principally related to the Company’s borrowings. Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk The Company uses interest rate derivatives to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate caps and interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges 73 involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty if interest rates rise above the strike rate on the contract. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. On April 24, 2015, the Company entered into two interest rate cap contracts, which were designated as cash flow hedges, and expired in May of 2019. On December 17, 2018, the Company entered into an interest rate swap contract, which was designated as a cash flow hedge, and became effective May 31, 2019. During Fiscal 2019, the Company’s derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing (or anticipated) variable-rate debt. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges are recorded in the line item “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the Company’s derivative contracts will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. As of February 1, 2020, the Company estimates that $5.9 million will be reclassified into interest expense during the next twelve months. As of February 1, 2020, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk: Interest Rate Derivative Interest rate swap contract Tabular Disclosure Number of Instruments Notional Aggregate Principal Amount Interest Cap/Swap Rate Maturity Date One $ 450.0 million 2.72% December 29, 2023 The tables below present the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on a gross basis, as well as their classification on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets: Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments Interest rate cap contracts (in thousands) Fair Values of Derivative Instruments February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 Balance Sheet Location Fair Value N/A N/A Balance Sheet Location Prepaid and other current assets Fair Value $2,213 Interest rate swap contract Other liabilities $26,220 Other liabilities $5,239 The following table presents the unrealized (losses) gains deferred to accumulated other comprehensive loss resulting from the Company’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments for each of the reporting periods. Interest Rate Derivatives: Unrealized (losses) gains, before taxes Income tax benefit (expense) (in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 $(22,959) 6,353 $(4,232) 1,152 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $ 3,460 (1,718) Unrealized (losses) gains, net of taxes $(16,606) $(3,080) $ 1,742 74 The following table presents information about the reclassification of losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings related to the Company’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments for each of the reporting periods. Component of Earnings: Interest expense Income tax expense Net reclassification into earnings (in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 $1,733 (474) $1,259 $1,872 (518) $1,354 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $ 5,931 (2,369) $ 3,562 9. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss are recorded net of the related income tax effects. The table below details the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss for Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018. Balance at February 3, 2018 Unrealized losses, net of related tax benefit of $1.2 million Amount reclassified into earnings, net of related taxes of $0.5 million Balance at February 2, 2019 Unrealized losses, net of related tax benefit of $6.4 million Amount reclassified into earnings, net of related taxes of $0.5 million Balance at February 1, 2020 (in thousands) Derivative Instruments $ (1,887) (3,080) 1,354 $ (3,613) (16,606) 1,259 $(18,960) 10. Capital Stock Common Stock As of February 1, 2020, the total amount of the Company’s authorized capital stock consisted of 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 50,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, par value of $0.0001 per share. The Company’s common stock is not entitled to preemptive or other similar subscription rights to purchase any of the Company’s securities. The Company’s common stock is neither convertible nor redeemable. Unless the Company’s Board of Directors determines otherwise, the Company will issue all of the Company’s capital stock in uncertificated form. Preferred Stock The Company does not have any shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding. The Company’s Board of Directors has the authority to issue shares of preferred stock from time to time on terms it may determine, to 75 divide shares of preferred stock into one or more series and to fix the designations, preferences, privileges, and restrictions of preferred stock, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preference, sinking fund terms, and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of any series to the fullest extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. The issuance of the Company’s preferred stock could have the effect of decreasing the trading price of the Company’s common stock, restricting dividends on the Company’s capital stock, diluting the voting power of the Company’s common stock, impairing the liquidation rights of the Company’s capital stock, or delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company. Dividend Rights Each holder of shares of the Company’s capital stock will be entitled to receive such dividends and other distributions in cash, stock or property as may be declared by the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time out of the Company’s assets or funds legally available for dividends or other distributions. These rights are subject to the preferential rights of any other class or series of the Company’s preferred stock. Treasury Stock The Company accounts for treasury stock under the cost method. During Fiscal 2019, the Company acquired 132,222 shares of common stock from employees for approximately $23.2 million to satisfy their minimum statutory tax withholdings related to the vesting of restricted stock awards. Share Repurchase Programs On August 15, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $300 million of common stock, which was completed during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019. On August 14, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $400 million of common stock, which is authorized to be executed through August 2021. These repurchase programs are funded using the Company’s available cash and borrowings under the ABL Line of Credit. During Fiscal 2019, the Company repurchased 1,740,740 shares of common stock for $299.9 million under its share repurchase programs, which was recorded in the line item, “Treasury stock” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the line item “Purchase of treasury shares” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As of February 1, 2020, the Company had $398.5 million remaining under its share repurchase authorization. 76 11. Net Income Per Share Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Dilutive net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted- average number of common shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Basic net income per share Net income (in thousands, except per share data) Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $465,116 $414,745 $384,852 Weighted average number of common shares—basic 65,943 66,812 68,286 Net income per common share—basic $ 7.05 $ 6.21 $ 5.64 Diluted net income per share Net income Shares for basic and diluted net income per share: Weighted average number of common $465,116 $414,745 $384,852 shares—basic 65,943 66,812 68,286 Assumed exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock 1,350 1,867 2,002 Weighted average number of common shares—diluted 67,293 68,679 70,288 Net income per common share—diluted $ 6.91 $ 6.04 $ 5.48 Approximately 405,000 shares, 425,000 shares and less than 150,000 shares were excluded from diluted net income per share for Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, respectively, since their effect was anti-dilutive. 12. Stock-Based Compensation On May 1, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Company’s assumption and adoption of the 2006 Management Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan) that was previously sponsored by Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, LLC. The 2006 Plan terminated on April 12, 2016. The Company’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2013 Plan and, together with the 2006 Plan, the Plans), originally adopted effective prior to and in connection with the Company’s initial public offering, was amended and restated effective May 17, 2017. The 2006 Plan, prior to its termination, and the 2013 Plan provide for the granting of stock options, restricted stock and other forms of awards to key employees and directors of the Company or its affiliates. The Company accounts for awards issued under the Plans in accordance with Topic No. 718. As of February 1, 2020, there were 3,280,488 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2013 Plan. CEO Awards A portion of the awards granted during Fiscal 2019 were granted to Michael O’Sullivan, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (the CEO), upon commencement of his employment in September 2019. To compensate the CEO for a portion of the equity awards forfeited at his prior employer, he received a make-whole long-term incentive grant with a target grant date fair value of $25.0 million, comprised of 50% time-based restricted stock 77 units and 50% stock options, vesting in one-third annual increments (subject to the CEO’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date). The CEO also received a prorated portion of his Fiscal 2019 long-term incentive award (such award having a target grant date fair value equal to $8.5 million), delivered as 50% performance-based restricted stock units, 25% stock options and 25% time-based restricted stock units, on the same terms as the Company’s Fiscal 2019 annual equity grants. Stock Options Options granted during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, were all service-based awards granted under the Plans at the following exercise prices: Fiscal 2019 Fiscal 2018 Fiscal 2017 Exercise Price Ranges From To $145.08 $113.80 $ 80.91 $231.86 $172.40 $110.50 All awards granted during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, other than certain awards granted to the CEO as noted above, vest 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. The final exercise date for any option granted is the tenth anniversary of the grant date. Options granted during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017 become exercisable if the grantee’s employment is terminated without cause or, in some instances, the recipient resigns with good reason, within a certain period of time following a change in control. Unless determined otherwise by the plan administrator, upon cessation of employment other than for cause, the majority of options that have not vested will terminate immediately, and unexercised vested options will be exercisable for a period of 60 to 180 days. In May 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a modification to all then outstanding options. The modification, through a combination of either reduced exercise prices or cash payments, did not affect the existing vesting schedules. The modification resulted in a total of $0.1 million of incremental compensation expense during Fiscal 2017, of which less than $0.1 million was payable in cash. These costs were recorded in the line item “Stock option modification expense” in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. There was no incremental compensation expense as a result of the modification during Fiscal 2019 or Fiscal 2018. As of February 1, 2020, the Company does not expect to recognize any additional compensation expense related to the modification. Non-cash stock compensation expense is as follows: Type of Non-Cash Stock Compensation Restricted stock grants(a) Stock option grants(a) Stock option modification(b) Performance stock grants(a) Total(c) (in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 $20,454 19,222 — 4,252 $43,928 $18,967 16,518 — — $35,485 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $15,864 11,039 131 — $27,034 (a) Included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. (b) Represents non-cash compensation related to the May 2013 stock option modification as discussed above. Amounts are included in the line item “Stock option modification expense” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. 78 (c) The amounts presented in the table above exclude the effect of income taxes. The tax benefit related to the Company’s non-cash stock compensation was $9.0 million, $9.7 million and $2.8 million during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, respectively. As of February 1, 2020, the Company had 1,890,955 options outstanding to purchase shares of common stock, and there was $40.8 million of unearned non-cash stock-based option compensation that the Company expects to recognize as expense over a weighted average period of 2.5 years. The awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Stock option transactions during Fiscal 2019 are summarized as follows: Options outstanding, February 2, 2019 Options granted Options exercised(a) Options forfeited Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share $ 64.48 180.22 48.14 89.20 Number of Shares 2,337,316 417,286 (710,964) (152,683) Options outstanding, February 1, 2020 1,890,955 $ 94.17 (a) Options exercised during Fiscal 2019 had a total intrinsic value of $94.1 million. The following table summarizes information about the options outstanding and exercisable as of February 1, 2020: Exercise Prices $0.79 - $4.55 $26.96+ Options Outstanding Options Exercisable Number Outstanding at February 1, 2020 399,129 1,491,826 1,890,955 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) 3.4 7.7 Number Exercisable at February 1, 2020 247,329 424,077 671,406 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) 3.4 6.3 The following table summarizes information about the stock options vested and expected to vest during the contractual term: Vested and expected to vest 1,890,955 6.8 $94.17 $233.2 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) Weighted Average Exercise Price Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions) Options 79 The fair value of each stock option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Monte Carlo Simulation option pricing model prior to the date of the Company’s initial public offering and the Black Scholes option pricing model subsequent to the date of the initial public offering. The fair value of each stock option granted during Fiscal 2019 was estimated using the following assumptions: Risk-free interest rate Expected volatility Expected life (years) Contractual life (years) Expected dividend yield Weighted average grant date fair value of options issued Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 1.47%—3.00% 32%—36% 5.69—6.25 10.0 0.0% $67.41 The expected dividend yield was based on the Company’s expectation of not paying dividends in the foreseeable future. Since the Company completed its initial public offering in October 2013, it does not have sufficient history as a publicly traded company to evaluate its volatility factor. As such, the expected stock price volatility is based upon the historical volatility of the stock price over the expected life of the options of peer companies that are publicly traded. The risk free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury rates for U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with maturities similar to those of the expected term of the awards being valued. For grants issued during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, the expected life of the options was calculated using the simplified method, which defines the life as the average of the contractual term of the options and the weighted average vesting period for all option tranches. This methodology was utilized due to the short length of time our common stock has been publicly traded. Restricted Stock Awards Restricted stock awards granted during Fiscal 2019 were all service-based awards. The fair value of each unit of restricted stock granted during Fiscal 2019 was based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. As of February 1, 2020, the Company had 40,000 awards outstanding that cliff vest at the end of the service periods ranging from three years to five years from the grant date. Awards granted to non-employee members of the Company’s Board of Directors before Fiscal 2018 have graded vesting provisions that generally vest in thirds over a three-year period. Awards granted to non-employee members of the Company’s Board of Directors during Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2019 vest 100% on the first anniversary of the grant date. The remaining awards outstanding as of February 1, 2020, other than certain awards granted to the CEO as noted above, have graded vesting provisions that generally vest in quarters over a four-year-period. Following a change of control, all unvested restricted stock awards shall remain unvested, provided, however, that 100% of such shares shall vest if, following such change of control, the employment of the recipient is terminated without cause or, in some instances, the recipient resigns with good reason, within a certain period of time following a change in control. As of February 1, 2020, there was approximately $43.0 million of unearned non-cash stock-based compensation related to restricted stock awards that the Company expects to recognize as an expense over the next 2.5 years. The awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods. 80 Prior to May 1, 2019, the Company granted shares of restricted stock. Grants made on and after May 1, 2019 are in the form of restricted stock units. Award grant, vesting and forfeiture transactions during Fiscal 2019 are summarized as follows: Non-vested awards outstanding, February 2, 2019 Awards granted Awards vested(a) Awards forfeited Non-vested awards outstanding, February 1, 2020 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Award $ 81.93 177.72 67.48 101.32 131.03 Number of Shares 666,842 192,278 (344,800) (62,546) 451,774 (a) Restricted stock awards vested during Fiscal 2019 had a total intrinsic value of $60.1 million. Performance Share Units Beginning in Fiscal 2019, the Company granted performance share units to its senior executives. Vesting of these performance share units is based on pre-established EBIT margin expansion and sales compound annual growth rate (CAGR) goals (each weighted equally) over a three-year performance period. Based on the Company’s achievement of these goals, each award may range from 50% (at threshold performance) to no more than 200% of the target award. In the event that actual performance is below threshold, no award will be made. In addition to the performance conditions, each performance share unit cliff vests at the end of a three-year service period. Following a change of control, all unvested performance share units shall remain unvested, provided, however, that 100% of such shares shall vest if, following such change of control, the employment of the recipient is terminated without cause or, in some instances, the recipient resigns with good reason, within a certain period of time following a change in control. As of February 1, 2020, there was approximately $12.6 million of unearned non-cash stock-based compensation related to performance share units that the Company expects to recognize as an expense over the next 2.3 years. The awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods. Performance share unit transactions during Fiscal 2019 are summarized as follows: Non-vested units outstanding, February 2, 2019 Units granted Awards forfeited Non-vested units outstanding, February 1, 2020 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Award $ — 173.51 170.08 173.87 Number of Shares — 89,448 (8,497) 80,951 13. Lease Commitments The Company’s leases primarily consist of stores, distribution facilities and office space under operating and finance leases that will expire principally during the next 30 years. The leases typically include renewal options at five year intervals and escalation clauses. Lease renewals are only included in the lease liability to the extent that they are reasonably assured of being exercised. The Company’s leases typically provide for contingent rentals based on a percentage of gross sales. Contingent rentals are not included in the lease liability, and they are recognized as variable lease cost when incurred. 81 The following is a schedule of the Company’s future lease payments: Fiscal Year 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter Total future minimum lease payments Amount representing interest Total lease liabilities Less: current portion of lease liabilities (in thousands) Operating Leases 435,535 419,251 402,649 381,618 344,272 1,324,733 3,308,058 (683,873) 2,624,185 (302,185) Finance Leases 6,057 6,841 7,513 7,589 7,417 38,651 74,068 (23,938) 50,130 (3,577) Total long term lease liabilities $2,322,000 $ 46,553 Weighted average discount rate Weighted average remaining lease term (years) 5.4% 8.6 7.0% 12.1 The above schedule excludes approximately $373.2 million for 51 stores that the Company has committed to open or relocate but has not yet taken possession of the space. The following is a schedule of net lease costs for Fiscal 2019: Finance lease cost: Amortization of finance lease asset(a) Interest on lease liabilities(b) Operating lease cost(c) Variable lease cost(c) Total lease cost Less all rental income(d) Total net rent expense(e) (in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 $ 4,027 2,770 414,174 155,210 576,181 (5,029) $571,152 (a) (b) (c) Included in the line item “Depreciation and amortization” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Included in the line item “Interest expense” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Includes real estate taxes, common area maintenance, insurance and percentage rent. Included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Included in the line item “Other revenue” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. (d) (e) Excludes an immaterial amount of short-term lease cost. 82 Supplemental cash flow disclosures related to leases are as follows: Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: Cash payments arising from operating lease liabilities(a) Cash payments for the principal portion of finance lease liabilities(b) Cash payments for the interest portion of finance lease liabilities(a) Supplemental non-cash information: Operating lease liabilities arising from obtaining right-of-use assets (in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 $401,575 $ $ 2,932 2,770 $690,827 (a) (b) Included within operating activities in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Included within financing activities in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The following is a schedule of net rent expense for the periods indicated under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 840, “Leases.” Prior periods have not been adjusted for adoption of ASU 2016-02: Rent expense: Minimum rental payments Contingent rental payments Straight-line rent expense Lease incentives amortization Amortization of purchased lease rights Total rent expense(a) Less all rental income(b) Total net rent expense (in thousands) Year Ended February 2, 2019 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $364,637 6,047 8,469 (34,827) 844 345,170 (6,164) $340,979 4,734 7,543 (32,618) 499 321,137 (6,846) $339,006 $314,291 (a) (b) Included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Included in the line item “Other revenue” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. 83 As previously disclosed in the Company’s Fiscal 2018 Form 10-K and under the previous lease accounting standard, future minimum lease payments due under non-cancelable operating leases as of February 2, 2019 would have been as follows: Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Thereafter Total minimum lease payments Amount representing interest (in thousands) Operating Leases $ 383,877 405,370 387,140 369,068 346,175 1,475,301 3,366,931 — Capital Leases $ 5,414 5,120 5,597 5,725 6,291 15,849 43,996 (11,290) Total future minimum lease payments $3,366,931 $ 32,706 The above schedule included $278.9 million related to options to extend lease terms that were reasonably assured of being exercised and $622.4 million of minimum lease payments for 76 stores that the Company had committed to open or relocate. 14. Employee Retirement Plans The Company maintains separate defined contribution 401(k) retirement savings and profit-sharing plans covering employees in the United States and Puerto Rico who meet specified age and service requirements. The discretionary profit sharing component (which the Company has not utilized since 2005 and has no current plans to utilize) is entirely funded by the Company, and the Company also makes additional matching contributions to the 401(k) component of the plans. Participating employees can voluntarily elect to contribute a percentage of their earnings to the 401(k) component of the plans (up to certain prescribed limits) through a cash or deferred (salary deferral) feature qualifying under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (401(k) Plan). The Company recorded $10.0 million, $9.3 million and $8.4 million of 401(k) Plan match expense during Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017 respectively, which is included in the line item “Selling, general and administrative expenses” on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. 15. Income Taxes Income before income taxes was as follows for Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017: Domestic Foreign (in thousands) Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 $573,399 7,126 $503,290 4,294 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $429,939 (959) Total income before income taxes $580,525 $507,584 $428,980 84 Income tax expense was as follows for Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017: Current: Federal State Foreign Subtotal Deferred: Federal State Foreign Subtotal (in thousands) Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 $ 83,521 20,778 2,040 106,339 $69,007 19,642 1,671 90,320 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $ 65,824 8,824 207 74,855 8,375 1,012 (317) 9,070 8,337 (8,409) 2,591 2,519 (40,839) 9,091 1,021 (30,727) Total Income Tax Expense $115,409 $92,839 $ 44,128 The tax rate reconciliations were as follows for Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017: Tax at statutory rate State income taxes, net of federal Excess tax benefit from stock compensation Tax credits Impact of federal tax reform Other Effective tax rate Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) 21.0% 4.0 (5.3) (1.0) — 1.2 19.9% 21.0% 4.2 (5.2) (1.2) — (0.5) 18.3% 33.7% 3.0 (4.4) (1.4) (21.1) 0.5 10.3% The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily related to the one-time tax benefit in the prior year from the deferred tax revaluation due to changes in New Jersey tax law, enacted during the second quarter of Fiscal 2018. 85 The tax effects of temporary differences are included in deferred tax accounts as follows: (in thousands) February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 Tax Assets Tax Liabilities Tax Assets Tax Liabilities Non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities: Property and equipment basis adjustments Operating lease liability Operating lease asset Deferred rent Intangibles—long-lived Intangibles—indefinite-lived Employee benefit compensation State net operating losses (net of federal benefit) Landlord allowances Tax credits Other Valuation allowance $ — $171,949 682,104 — 645,240 — — — — 14,933 9,346 — 8,154 — (9,842) — — 64,842 — — — — 274 — $ — $149,705 — — 19,496 — — 15,186 12,290 35,907 6,140 2,651 (10,268) — — — 40,918 65,197 — — — — — — Total non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities $704,695 $882,305 $ 81,402 $255,820 Net deferred tax liability $177,610 $174,418 As of February 1, 2020, the Company has a deferred tax asset related to net operating losses of $9.3 million, inclusive of $9.0 million of state net operating losses which will expire at various dates between 2020 and 2039 and $0.3 million of deferred tax assets recorded for Puerto Rico net operating loss carry-forwards that will expire in 2025. As of February 1, 2020, the Company had tax credit carry-forwards of $8.2 million, inclusive of state tax credit carry-forwards of $6.8 million that will begin to expire in 2020 and $1.4 million of Puerto Rico alternative minimum tax (AMT) credits that have an indefinite life. As of February 2, 2019, the Company had a deferred tax asset related to net operating losses of $12.3 million, inclusive of $10.4 million of state net operating losses, and $1.9 million of deferred tax assets recorded for Puerto Rico net operating loss carry-forwards. As of February 2, 2019, the Company had tax credit carry-forwards of $6.1 million, inclusive of state tax credit carry-forwards of $4.5 million, and $1.6 million of Puerto Rico AMT credits. We believe that it is more likely than not that the benefit from certain state net operating loss carry forwards and credits will not be realized. In recognition of this risk, we have provided a valuation allowance of $5.6 million on state net operating losses and $3.9 million on state tax credit carry forwards. In addition, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the benefit from Puerto Rico net operating loss carry- forwards will not be realized. As a result, we have provided for a full valuation allowance of $0.3 million. If our assumptions change and we determine we will be able to realize these net operating losses or credits, the tax benefits relating to any reversal of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets as of February 1, 2020 will be recorded to the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. As of February 2, 2019, we provided a total valuation allowance of $10.3 million, inclusive of $5.9 of valuation allowance related to state net operating losses, $2.5 million related to tax credit carry-forwards and $1.9 million related to Puerto Rico. 86 A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits (exclusive of interest and penalties) is as follows: Balance at January 28, 2017 Additions for tax positions of the current year Additions for tax positions of prior years Reduction for tax positions of prior years Settlements Lapse of statute of limitations Balance at February 3, 2018 Additions for tax positions of the current year Additions for tax positions of prior years Reduction for tax positions of prior years Settlements Lapse of statute of limitations Balance at February 2, 2019 Additions for tax positions of the current year Additions for tax positions of prior years Reduction for tax positions of prior years Settlements Lapse of statute of limitations Balance at February 1, 2020 (in thousands) Gross Unrecognized Tax Benefits, Exclusive of Interest and Penalties $9,193 72 882 (973) — (101) $9,073 18 698 (782) — (80) $8,927 — — (783) — (67) $8,077 As of February 1, 2020, the Company reported total unrecognized benefits of $8.1 million, of which $6.4 million would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. As a result of previous positions taken and current period activity, the Company recorded a net benefit of $0.2 million of interest and penalties during Fiscal 2019 in the line item “Income tax expense” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Cumulative interest and penalties of $12.0 million are recorded in the line item “Other liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 1, 2020. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of income taxes. Within the next twelve months, the Company does not expect any significant changes in its unrecognized tax benefits. As of February 2, 2019, the Company reported total unrecognized benefits of $8.9 million, of which $7.1 million would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. As a result of previous positions taken, the Company recorded an increase of $0.2 million of interest and penalties during Fiscal 2018 in the line item “Income tax expense” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Cumulative interest and penalties of $12.3 million are recorded in the line item “Other liabilities” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 2, 2019. The Company files tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Puerto Rico, and various state jurisdictions. The Company is open to examination by the IRS under the applicable statutes of limitations for Fiscal Years 2016 through 2019. The Company or its subsidiaries’ state and Puerto Rico income tax returns are open to audit for Fiscal Years 2014 through 2019, with a few exceptions, under the applicable statutes of limitations. There are ongoing state audits in several jurisdictions, and the Company has accrued for possible exposures as required under Topic No. 740. The Company does not expect the settlement of these audits to have a material impact to its financial results. 87 16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company accounts for fair value measurements in accordance with Topic No. 820 which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measurement and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Topic No. 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price), and classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy: Level 1: Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2: Quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. Level 3: Pricing inputs that are unobservable for the assets and liabilities, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the assets and liabilities. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. Refer to Note 8, “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” for further discussion regarding the fair value of the Company’s interest rate cap contracts. Financial Assets The fair values of the Company’s financial assets and the hierarchy of the level of inputs as of February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019 are summarized below: (in thousands) Fair Value Measurements at February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 Level 1 Cash equivalents (including restricted cash) $369,733 $22,416 Financial Liabilities The fair values of the Company’s financial liabilities are summarized below: Term B-5 Loans ABL Line of Credit Total debt(a) (in thousands) February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value $957,505 — $959,899 — $956,693 — $947,126 — $957,505 $959,899 $956,693 $947,126 (a) Finance lease obligations are excluded from the table above. The fair values presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the respective year end dates. The estimated fair values of the Company’s debt are classified as Level 2 in the fair 88 value hierarchy. Although management is not aware of any factors that could significantly affect the estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since that date, and current estimates of fair value may differ from amounts presented herein. 17. Commitments and Contingencies Legal Like many retailers, the Company has been named in potential class or collective actions on behalf of groups alleging violations of federal and state wage and hour and other labor statutes, and alleged violation of state consumer and/or privacy protection and other statutes. The Company is involved in a federal wage and hour lawsuit alleging that certain exempt employees were misclassified under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In late November 2019, the Court overseeing this lawsuit granted final certification allowing the matter to proceed as a collective action under the FLSA. In addition, the Company is involved in a putative class action matter raising similar allegations of misclassification under the wage and hour laws of three states. This matter was stayed by the Court shortly after it was filed and has remained stayed to date. At this time, the Company is not able to predict the outcome of these two lawsuits and cannot reasonably estimate any reasonably possible loss therefrom. The Company is also party to representative claims under the California Private Attorneys’ General Act and various other lawsuits and regulatory proceedings including, among others, commercial, product, product safety, employee, customer, intellectual property and other claims. Actions against us are in various procedural stages. Many of these proceedings raise factual and legal issues and are subject to uncertainties. While no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of these matters, the Company believes that the final resolution of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, liquidity or capital resources. Letters of Credit The Company had irrevocable letters of credit in the amounts of $53.1 million and $56.7 million as of February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively. Letters of credit outstanding as of February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019 amounted to $46.6 million and $48.9 million, respectively, guaranteeing performance under various lease agreements, insurance contracts, and utility agreements. The Company also had outstanding letters of credit arrangements in the aggregate amount of $6.5 million and $7.8 million at February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively, related to certain merchandising agreements. Based on the terms of the Amended ABL Credit Agreement relating to the ABL Line of Credit, the Company had available letters of credit of $501.8 million and $543.3 million as of February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, respectively. Inventory Purchase Commitments The Company had $921.2 million of purchase commitments related to goods that were not received as of February 1, 2020. Death Benefits In November 2005, the Company entered into agreements with three of the Company’s former executives whereby, upon each of their deaths, the Company will pay $1.0 million to each respective designated beneficiary. 18. Related Party Transactions The brother-in-law of one of the Company’s Executive Vice Presidents is an independent sales representative of one of the Company’s suppliers of merchandise inventory. This relationship predated the 89 commencement of the Executive Vice President’s employment with the Company. The Company has determined that the dollar amount of purchases through such supplier represents an insignificant amount of its inventory purchases. 19. Quarterly Results (Unaudited) In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments which are necessary for the fair presentation of the quarters presented. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results of any future quarter. Year ended February 1, 2020: Net sales Gross margin(1)(2) Net income Net income per share—basic(3): Common stockholders Net income per share—diluted(3): Common stockholders Year ended February 2, 2019: Net sales Gross margin (1)(2) Net income Net income per share—basic(3): Common stockholders Net income per share—diluted(3): Common stockholders (in thousands, except share data) Quarter Ended May 4, 2019 August 3, 2019 November 2, 2019 February 1, 2020 $1,628,547 $ 667,229 77,765 $ $1,656,363 $ 685,942 84,567 $ $1,774,949 $ 752,037 96,459 $ $2,201,384 $ 927,295 $ 206,325 $ $ 1.18 1.15 $ $ 1.28 1.26 $ $ 1.46 1.44 $ $ 3.14 3.08 (in thousands, except share data) Quarter Ended May 5, 2018 August 4, 2018 November 3, 2018 February 2, 2019 $1,518,446 $ 625,764 82,588 $ $1,498,633 $ 621,159 70,957 $ $1,634,489 $ 692,480 76,849 $ $1,991,483 $ 835,529 $ 184,351 $ $ 1.23 1.20 $ $ 1.06 1.03 $ $ 1.15 1.12 $ $ 2.77 2.70 (1) Gross margin is equal to net sales less cost of sales. (2) During the quarterly periods ended February 1, 2020 and February 2, 2019, the Company recorded shortage adjustments of $1.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, as a result of actual shortage being less than what the Company had estimated throughout the year. (3) Quarterly net income per share results may not equal full year amounts due to rounding. 20. Subsequent Event Towards the end of December 2019, an outbreak of a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) emerged globally. There have been mandates from federal, state and local authorities requiring forced closures of non-essential retailers, which could negatively impact the Company’s business. Although it is not possible to reliably estimate the length or severity of this outbreak and hence its financial impact, any significant reduction in customer visits to, and spending at, the Company’s stores caused by COVID-19 would result in a loss of sales and profits and other material adverse effects. 90 Schedule I CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT Parent Company Information Burlington Stores, Inc. Balance Sheets ASSETS: Current assets Investment in subsidiaries Total assets LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: Current liabilities Negative investment in subsidiaries Commitments and contingencies Total stockholders’ equity As of February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 (in thousands) $ 51 $ 38 528,098 322,672 $528,149 $322,710 $ — $ — — — 528,149 — — 322,710 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $528,149 $322,710 See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements 91 CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT Parent Company Information Burlington Stores, Inc. Statements of Income REVENUES: Total revenue COSTS AND EXPENSES: Income from equity investment Total costs and expenses Income before provision for income tax Provision for income tax Earnings from equity investment, net of income taxes Net income Total comprehensive income Fiscal Years Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 (in thousands) February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $ — $ — $ — — — — — — — — — — — — — $465,116 $414,745 $384,852 $465,116 $414,745 $384,852 $465,116 $414,745 $384,852 See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements 92 CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT Parent Company Information Burlington Stores, Inc. Statements of Cash Flows OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net cash provided by operations INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Receipt of dividends Net cash used in investing activities FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from initial public offering Offering costs Receipt of dividends Payment of dividends Purchase of treasury shares Intercompany financing transactions Proceeds from stock option exercises Fiscal Years Ended February 1, 2020 February 2, 2019 (in thousands) February 3, 2018 (53 Weeks) $ — $ — $ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (323,080) 288,871 34,222 (228,874) 212,462 16,306 (289,777) 280,701 9,173 Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 13 13 38 51 (106) (106) 144 97 97 47 $ 38 $ 144 See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements 93 CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT Parent Company Information Burlington Stores, Inc. Note 1. Basis of Presentation Burlington Stores, Inc. (the Parent Company) is a holding company that conducts substantially all of its business operations through its subsidiaries. The Parent Company’s ability to pay dividends on Parent Company’s common stock will be limited by restrictions on the ability of Parent Company and its subsidiaries to pay dividends or make distributions under the terms of current and future agreements governing the indebtedness of Parent Company’s subsidiaries. In addition to other baskets under the agreements governing its indebtedness, the Parent Company and its subsidiaries are permitted to make dividends and distributions under the Term Loan Facility so long as there is no event of default and the pro forma consolidated leverage ratio of the Parent Company and its subsidiaries does not exceed 3.50 to 1.00, and under the ABL Line of Credit as long as certain restricted payment conditions are satisfied. The accompanying Condensed Financial Statements include the accounts of the Parent Company and, on an equity basis, its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates. Accordingly, these Condensed Financial Statements have been presented on a “parent-only” basis. Under a parent-only presentation, the Parent Company’s investments in its consolidated subsidiaries are presented under the equity method of accounting. These parent-only financial statements should be read in conjunction with Burlington Stores, Inc.’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein. Note 2. Dividends As discussed above, the terms of current and future agreements governing the indebtedness of the Parent Company and its subsidiaries include, or may include, limitations on the ability of such subsidiaries and the Parent Company to pay dividends, subject to certain exceptions set forth in such agreements. Note 3. Stock-Based Compensation Non-cash stock compensation expense of $43.9 million, $35.5 million and $27.0 million has been pushed down to Parent Company’s subsidiaries for Fiscal 2019, Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, respectively. 94 BURLINGTON STORES, INC. Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves (All amounts in thousands) Description Year ended February 1, 2020 Allowance for doubtful accounts Sales reserves(3) Valuation allowances on deferred tax assets Year ended February 2, 2019 Allowance for doubtful accounts Sales reserves(3) Valuation allowances on deferred tax assets Year ended February 3, 2018 Allowance for doubtful accounts Sales reserves(3) Valuation allowances on deferred tax assets Notes: Balance at Beginning of Period Charged to Costs & Expenses Charged to Other Accounts(1) Accounts Written Off or Deductions(2) Balance at End of Period 78 $ $ 9,451 $10,268 99 $ $ 3,768 $ 8,376 262 $ $ 3,419 $ 7,388 $ 992 $ — $ — $ 122 $ (19) $ — $ 411 $(524) $ — $ — $362,764 (426) $ 275 $ $360,546 $ — $ — $359,711 1,892 $ $ — $335,675 988 $ 143 $ $354,009 $ — 574 $ $334,802 $ — 795 $ $11,669 $ 9,842 78 $ $ 9,451 $10,268 99 $ $ 3,768 $ 8,376 (1) Amounts related to sales reserves are charged to net sales and cost of sales, and amounts related to valuation allowances on deferred taxes are charged to income tax expense. (2) Actual returns and allowances. (3) During Fiscal 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which requires the Company’s sales return reserve to be established at the gross sales value with an asset established for the value of the expected merchandise returned. The liability and asset related to the sales return reserve were $11.7 million and $7.0 million, respectively, as of February 1, 2020, and $9.5 million and $5.7 million, respectively, as of February 2, 2019, and were included in the lines “Other current liabilities” and “Prepaid and other current assets,” respectively, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Prior period amounts have not been adjusted. As of February 3, 2018, the net sales return reserve was $3.8 million and was included in the line “Other current liabilities” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. 95 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Our management team, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as of the last day of the fiscal period covered by this Annual Report, February 1, 2020. The term disclosure controls and procedures means our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of February 1, 2020. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the issuer’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the issuer’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that: • • • pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In accordance with the internal control reporting requirement of the SEC, management completed an assessment of the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment and the criteria in the COSO framework, management has concluded that, as of February 1, 2020, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. 96 Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited and reported on our consolidated financial statements contained herein, has audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2020, and has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting included herein. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 97 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Burlington Stores, Inc. Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Burlington Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of February 1, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 1, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, as of and for the year ended February 1, 2020, of the Company and our report dated March 13, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-12, Leases (Topic 842), using the alternative transition method. Basis for Opinion The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Parsippany, New Jersey March 13, 2020 98 Item 9B. Other Information. None. Part III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance For the information required by this Item 10, see “Election of Directors,” “Information About Our Executive Officers,” “Corporate Governance,” and “Board Committees,” in the Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”), which information is incorporated herein by reference. The Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days of the close of our 2019 fiscal year. Item 11. Executive Compensation For the information required by this Item 11, see “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters For the information required by this Item 12, see “Ownership of Securities” and “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence For the information required by this Item 13, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” and “Corporate Governance” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services For the information required by this Item 14, see “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” and “Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement, which information is incorporated herein by reference. 99 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules (a) Documents Filed as Part of this Report (1) Financial Statements. The Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this Annual Report are listed on the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 42 of this Annual Report. (2) Financial Statement Schedules. Schedule I—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant filed as part of this Annual Report is set forth on pages 78-81. Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts filed as part of this Annual Report is set forth on page 82 of this Annual Report. All other financial statement schedules have been omitted here because they are not applicable, not required, or the information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto. (3) Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K. The following is a list of exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and filed as part of this Annual Report. Exhibits that previously have been filed are incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit Number 3.1 3.2 4.1† 10.1 10.1.1 Exhibit Description Incorporated by Reference Form Filing Date Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Burlington Stores, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1/A September 10, 2013 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Burlington Stores, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K February 27, 2018 Current Report on Form 8-K February 24, 2011 Current Report on Form 8-K May 17, 2012 Description of the Registrant’s Securities. Credit Agreement, dated February 24, 2011, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, as borrower, the facility guarantors signatory thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent, Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, the lenders party thereto, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners. Amendment No. 1, dated May 16, 2012, to the Credit Agreement, dated February 24, 2011, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent, and the other parties thereto. 100 Incorporated by Reference Form Filing Date Current Report on Form 8-K February 21, 2013 Current Report on Form 8-K May 22, 2013 Current Report on Form 8-K August 18, 2014 Current Report on Form 8-K July 29, 2016 Current Report on Form 8-K November 21, 2017 Current Report on Form 8-K November 8, 2018 Current Report on Form 8-K March 3, 2020 Exhibit Number 10.1.2 10.1.3 10.1.4 10.1.5 10.1.6 10.1.7 10.1.8 Exhibit Description Amendment No. 2, dated February 15, 2013, to the Credit Agreement, dated February 24, 2011, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, the lender parties thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent, and the other parties thereto. Amendment No. 3, dated May 17, 2013, to the Credit Agreement, dated February 24, 2011, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent. Amendment No. 4, dated August 13, 2014, to the Credit Agreement, dated February 24, 2011, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent. Amendment No. 5, dated July 29, 2016, to the Credit Agreement, dated February 24, 2011, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent. Amendment No. 6 to the Credit Agreement, dated November 17, 2017, to the Credit Agreement, dated February 24, 2011, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent. Amendment No. 7 to the Credit Agreement, dated November 2, 2018, to the Credit Agreement, dated February 24, 2011, by and among Burlington Coat Factor Warehouse Corporation, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent. Amendment No. 8 to the Credit Agreement, dated February 26, 2020, to the Credit Agreement, dated February 24, 2011, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent. 101 Exhibit Number 10.2 10.2.1 10.2.2 10.2.3 10.3 10.4 Exhibit Description Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated September 2, 2011, among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, as lead borrower, the borrowers named therein and the facility guarantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and as collateral agent, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as co-syndication agents, and Suntrust Bank and U.S. Bank, National Association, as co-documentation agents, the lenders named therein, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as joint lead arrangers, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as joint bookrunners. First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated August 13, 2014, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, as lead borrower, the other borrowers party thereto, the facility guarantors thereto, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent. Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated June 29, 2018, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, as lead borrower, the other borrowers party thereto, the facility guarantors thereto, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent. Consent and Technical Modification Agreement, dated December 3, 2018, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, as lead borrower, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent Revolving Credit Note, dated April 13, 2006, by the borrowers party thereto in favor of PNC Bank, National Association. Revolving Credit Note, dated April 13, 2006, by the borrowers party thereto in favor of Siemens Financial Services, Inc. 102 Incorporated by Reference Form Filing Date Current Report on Form 8-K September 9, 2011 Current Report on Form 8-K August 18, 2014 Current Report on Form 8-K July 2, 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K March 20, 2019 Registration Statement on Form S-4 October 10, 2006 Registration Statement on Form S-4 October 10, 2006 Exhibit Description Form Incorporated by Reference Filing Date April 30, 2010 Transition Report on Form 10-K/T Registration Statement on Form S-4 October 10, 2006 Registration Statement on Form S-4 October 10, 2006 Registration Statement on Form S-4 October 10, 2006 Registration Statement on Form S-4 October 10, 2006 Transition Report on Form 10-K/T April 30, 2010 Registration Statement on Form S-4 Registration Statement on Form S-4 October 10, 2006 October 10, 2006 Registration Statement on Form S-4 October 10, 2006 Registration Statement on Form S-4 October 10, 2006 Exhibit Number 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Note, dated January 15, 2010, by the borrowers party thereto in favor of Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC. Revolving Credit Note, dated April 13, 2006, by the borrowers party thereto in favor of National City Business Credit, Inc. Revolving Credit Note, dated April 13, 2006, by the borrowers party thereto in favor of Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania. Revolving Credit Note, dated April 13, 2006, by the borrowers party thereto in favor of HSBC Business Credit (USA), Inc. Revolving Credit Note, dated April 13, 2006, by the borrowers party thereto in favor of Sovereign Bank. Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Note, dated January 15, 2010, by the borrowers party thereto in favor of Capital One Leverage Finance Corp. 10.11 Form of Swingline Note. 10.12 10.13 10.14 Guaranty, dated April 13, 2006, by the facility guarantors party thereto in favor of Bank of America, N.A., as administrative Agent and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral Agent. Security Agreement, dated April 13, 2006, by and among each of the borrowers party thereto, each of the facility guarantors party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as collateral agent. Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated April 13, 2006, by and among each of the borrowers party thereto, each of the facility guarantors party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as collateral agent. 103 Exhibit Number 10.15 10.16+ 10.16.1+ 10.16.2+ 10.17+ 10.17.1+ 10.17.2+ 10.17.3+ Exhibit Description Pledge Agreement, dated April 13, 2006, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc., Burlington Coat Factory Investments Holdings, Inc., Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Realty Corp., Burlington Coat Factory Purchasing, Inc., K&T Acquisition Corp., Burlington Coat Factory of New York, LLC, Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of Baytown, Inc., Burlington Coat Factory of Texas, Inc., as the pledgors, and Bank of America, N.A., as collateral agent. Employment Agreement, dated October 13, 2009, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Joyce Manning Magrini. Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated February 26, 2010, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Joyce Manning Magrini. Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated October 18, 2012, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Joyce Manning Magrini. Employment Agreement, dated December 2, 2008, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc., and Thomas Kingsbury. Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated October 23, 2012, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc., and Thomas Kingsbury. Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated December 8, 2014, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, LLC, Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas Kingsbury. Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement, dated May 18, 2015, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, LLC, Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas Kingsbury. 104 Incorporated by Reference Form Filing Date Registration Statement on Form S-4 October 10, 2006 Transition Report on Form 10-K/T April 30, 2010 Transition Report on Form 10-K/T April 30, 2010 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q December 11, 2012 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q April 14, 2009 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q December 11, 2012 Current Report on Form 8-K December 9, 2014 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q August 31, 2015 Exhibit Number 10.17.4+ 10.17.5+ 10.17.6+ 10.17.7+ 10.18+ 10.18.1+ 10.19+ 10.19.1+ 10.20+ 10.20.1+ Exhibit Description Amendment No. 4 to Employment Agreement, dated May 29, 2015, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, LLC, Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas Kingsbury. Amendment No. 5 to Employment Agreement, dated July 7, 2015, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, LLC, Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas Kingsbury. Amendment No. 6 to Employment Agreement, dated January 20, 2017, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation, Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, LLC, Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas Kingsbury. Chairman Agreement, dated June 14, 2019, by and between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas A. Kingsbury. Employment Agreement, dated January 28, 2008, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Fred Hand. Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated October 31, 2012, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Fred Hand. Employment Agreement, dated June 26, 2008, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Marc Katz. Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated October 16, 2012, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Marc Katz. Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated July 28, 2015, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Jennifer Vecchio. Amendment, dated May 19, 2017, to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated July 28, 2015, by and among Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and Jennifer Vecchio. 105 Incorporated by Reference Form Filing Date Current Report on Form 8-K June 1, 2015 Current Report on Form 8-K July 7, 2015 Current Report on Form 8-K January 20, 2017 Current Report on Form 8-K/A June 17, 2019 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q April 15, 2008 Registration Statement on Form S-1/A September 6, 2013 Current Report on Form 8-K June 27, 2008 Registration Statement on Form S-1/A September 6, 2013 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q August 31, 2015 Current Report on Form 8-K May 22, 2017 Exhibit Number 10.21+ 10.22+† 10.23+ 10.24+ 10.25+ 10.26+ 10.27+ 10.28+ 10.29+ Exhibit Description Employment Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2019, by and between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Michael O’Sullivan. Employment Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2011, by and between Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and John Crimmins Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc. and Employees with Employment Agreements (for grants made after March 2009 and prior to 2014 (other than 2013 special one-time grants)) pursuant to 2006 Management Incentive Plan. Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc. and Employees without Employment Agreements (for grants made after March 2009 and prior to 2014 (other than 2013 special one-time grants)) pursuant to 2006 Management Incentive Plan. Burlington Coat Factory Holdings, Inc. 2006 Management Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated June 15, 2013). Incorporated by Reference Form Current Report on Form 8-K Filing Date April 23, 2019 Current Report on Form 8-K April 30, 2009 Current Report on Form 8-K April 30, 2009 Registration Statement on Form S-1/A September 6, 2013 Form of Directors and Officers Indemnification Agreement. Registration Statement on Form S-1/A September 10, 2013 Current Report on Form 8-K May 22, 2017 Registration Statement on Form S-1/A September 6, 2013 Registration Statement on Form S-1/A September 6, 2013 Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017. Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, pursuant to Burlington Holdings, Inc. 2006 Management Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated June 15, 2013), between Burlington Holdings, Inc. and Employees with Employment Agreements (for 2013 special one-time grants). Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, pursuant to Burlington Holdings, Inc. 2006 Management Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated June 15, 2013), between Burlington Holdings, Inc. and Employees without Employment Agreements (for 2013 special one-time grants). 106 Incorporated by Reference Form Filing Date Registration Statement on Form S-1/A September 6, 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K March 25, 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K March 15, 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K March 15, 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K March 15, 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K March 15, 2016 Exhibit Number 10.30+ 10.31+ 10.32+ 10.33+ 10.34+ 10.35+ Exhibit Description Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, pursuant to Burlington Holdings, Inc. 2006 Management Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated June 15, 2013), dated June 17, 2013, between Burlington Holdings, Inc. and Thomas A. Kingsbury (for 2013 special one-time grant). Restricted Stock Grant Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas Kingsbury, dated December 15, 2014 (for grants made after 2014 and before May 2019). Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Employees with Employment Agreements pursuant to Burlington Holdings, Inc. 2006 Management Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated June 15, 2013) (for grants made from and after December 2015 and prior to November 2016). Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Employees without Employment Agreements pursuant to Burlington Holdings, Inc. 2006 Management Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated June 15, 2013) (for grants made from and after December 2015 and prior to November 2016). Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Employees with Employment Agreements pursuant to Burlington Holdings, Inc. 2006 Management Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated June 15, 2013) (for grants made from and after December 2015 and prior to November 2016). Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Employees without Employment Agreements pursuant to Burlington Holdings, Inc. 2006 Management Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated June 15, 2013) (for grants made from and after December 2015 and prior to November 2016). 107 Incorporated by Reference Form Filing Date Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q November 23, 2016 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q November 23, 2016 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q November 23, 2016 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q November 23, 2016 Current Report on Form 8-K Current Report on Form 8-K May 22, 2017 May 22, 2017 Exhibit Number 10.36+ 10.37+ 10.38+ 10.39+ 10.40+ 10.41+ Exhibit Description Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Employees with Employment Agreements pursuant to Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after November 2016 and prior to May 2017). Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Employees without Employment Agreements pursuant to Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after November 2016 and prior to May 2017). Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Employees with Employment Agreements pursuant to Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after November 2016 and prior to May 2017). Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Employees without Employment Agreements pursuant to Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after November 2016 and prior to May 2017). Burlington Stores, Inc. Executive Severance Plan Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Employees with Employment Agreements or Subject to the Executive Severance Plan pursuant to Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after May 2017 and prior to May 2019). 108 Incorporated by Reference Form Current Report on Form 8-K Filing Date May 22, 2017 Current Report on Form 8-K May 22, 2017 Current Report on Form 8-K May 22, 2017 Current Report on Form 8-K May 22, 2017 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q June 3, 2019 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q June 3, 2019 Exhibit Number 10.42+ 10.43+ 10.44+ 10.45+ 10.46+ 10.47+ Exhibit Description Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Employees without Employment Agreements pursuant to Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after May 2017 and prior to May 2019). Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Employees with Employment Agreements or Subject to the Executive Severance Plan pursuant to Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after May 2017 and prior to May 2019). Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Employees without Employment Agreements pursuant to Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after May 2017 and prior to May 2019). Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Independent Directors pursuant to Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after May 2017 and prior to March 2018). Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice and Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and award recipients pursuant to the Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after May 1, 2019). Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice and Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and award recipients pursuant to the Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after May 2019). 109 Incorporated by Reference Form Filing Date Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q June 3, 2019 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q June 3, 2019 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q June 3, 2019 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q June 3, 2019 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q August 29, 2019 Exhibit Number 10.48+ 10.49+ 10.50+ 10.51+ 10.52+ 21.1† 23.1† 31.1† 31.2† Exhibit Description Form of Stock Option Award Notice and Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and award recipients pursuant to the Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after May 2019). Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice and Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas A. Kingsbury pursuant to the Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after May 2019). Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice and Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas A. Kingsbury pursuant to the Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after May 2019). Form of Stock Option Award Notice and Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Thomas A. Kingsbury pursuant to the Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after May 2019). Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice and Agreement between Burlington Stores, Inc. and Non-Employee Directors pursuant to the Burlington Stores, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 17, 2017 (for grants made from and after May 2019). List of Subsidiaries of Burlington Stores, Inc. Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 110 Incorporated by Reference Form Filing Date Exhibit Number 32.1† 32.2† 101.INS† 101.SCH† 101.CAL† 101.DEF† 101.LAB† 101.PRE† 104† Exhibit Description Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in Interactive Data File, because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document Inline Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) + † Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. Filed or furnished herewith. Item 16. Form 10-K Summary None. 111 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES BURLINGTON STORES, INC. By: /s/ Michael O’Sullivan Michael O’Sullivan Chief Executive Officer Date: March 13, 2020 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 13th day of March 2020. Signature Title /s/ Michael O’Sullivan Michael O’Sullivan /s/ John Crimmins John Crimmins /s/ Ted English Ted English /s/ Jordan Hitch Jordan Hitch /s/ John Mahoney John Mahoney /s/ William McNamara William McNamara /s/ Jessica Rodriguez Jessica Rodriguez /s/ Laura J. Sen Laura J. Sen /s/ Paul Sullivan Paul Sullivan /s/ Mary Ann Tocio Mary Ann Tocio Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Director Director Director Director Director Director Director Director 112 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MANAGEMENT TEAM JOHN J. MAHONEY Retired Vice Chairman Staples, Inc. Chairman of the Board of Directors TED ENGLISH *1, 3 Executive Chairman Bob’s Discount Furniture MICHAEL O’SULLIVAN Chief Executive Officer JENNIFER VECCHIO President and Chief Merchandising Officer FRED HAND Chief Customer Officer/Principal JORDAN HITCH *1, 2 Former Managing Director Bain Capital Chair of the Compensation Committee GAYLE AERTKER Executive Vice President, Store Development WILLIAM P. MCNAMARA *2 Retired President Macy’s Reinvent Strategies Macy’s, Inc. MICHAEL O’SULLIVAN Chief Executive Officer Burlington Stores, Inc. JESSICA RODRIGUEZ *2 Chief Marketing Officer and President of Entertainment of UCI Networks LAURA J. SEN *3 Former Non-Executive Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. PAUL J. SULLIVAN *3 Retired Partner PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chair of the Audit Committee MARY ANN TOCIO *1,2 Retired President and Chief Operating Officer Bright Horizons Family Solutions, Inc. Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee FORREST DAVID CODER Executive Vice President of Stores JOHN CRIMMINS Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer SIIRI DOUGHERTY Executive Vice President of Merchandising KEVIN GRIFFIN Executive Vice President of Merchandising DENNIS HODGSON Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer JOYCE MANNING MAGRINI Executive Vice President, Human Resources MIKE METHENY Executive Vice President, Supply Chain, Corporate Services and Asset Protection ELIOT M. ROSENFIELD Executive Vice President of Merchandising RICK SEEGER Executive Vice President of Planning & Allocation and MIO CORPORATE AND STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION ANNUAL MEETING The company’s 2020 annual meeting of stockholders will take place at 8:00 AM on May 20, 2020. STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING New York Stock Exchange Trading Symbol — BURL INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Deloitte & Touche LLP Parsippany, New Jersey INVESTOR RELATIONS Investors, analysts and others seeking information about the company are asked to visit our investor relations website at www.BurlingtonInvestors.com g or to contact: David Glick Senior Vice President of Investor Relations and Treasurer (855) 973-8445 Info@BurlingtonInvestors.com g A copy of our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10- Q, and current reports on Form 8-K can be accessed on our investor relations website under the SEC Filings section or can be mailed upon request. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR (for registered stockholders) American Stock Transfer & Trust Company 6201 15th Avenue Brooklyn, New York 11219 (800) 937-5449 BENEFICIAL STOCKHOLDERS (Shares held by your broker in the name of the brokerage house) should direct questions to your broker *Board Committees 1 Compensation 2 Nominating and Corporate Governance 3 Audit
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above