Table of Contents
Message from the Chairman
Message from the President and CEO
Report on Operations - Systems Engineering
Report on Operations - Business and
Technology Services
Business of the Company
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management’s Statement of Responsibility
Auditors’ Report
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
Consolidated Statements of Net Earnings
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
1
3
4
5
6
8
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Message from the Chairman
Fiscal 2012 was yet another successful year for Calian as the management team was able to navigate the unset-
tled business environment and post excellent results compared to the prior year. At the same time, they were
able to assess the ever-changing dynamics of the marketplace and make the required organizational changes
to adapt. With the acquisition of Primacy Management we were faced with the inevitable cultural and inte-
gration issues, not experienced for some time. We are pleased with the progress to date and we as a board
have every confidence in management’s ability to take full advantage of the new resources and markets asso-
ciated with this acquisition.
This year also marked the 30th anniversary of the Company. Throughout the years, Calian’s key strength has
been its ability to adapt to an ever-changing business environment. Larry O’Brien, who founded the
Company in 1982, was instrumental in developing this corporate trait and in the process created an entity
that was built to last. With Larry’s decision to leave the board and take a well-deserved retirement after 30
years of contribution, we are confident that we have the necessary talent to be successful well into the
future. Also, during the year, we received the resignation of Paul Cellucci due to health reasons. We will miss
his insight, particularly as it pertains to US matters. The Board of Directors was pleased to appoint
George Weber as a replacement director and fully expect that he will contribute to the collective knowledge
and background of the Board.
The board is cognizant of its duties to ensure the timely and orderly succession of management and during
the past two years, we have witnessed the replacement of both of our divisional general managers due to
retirements. We are very pleased with the seamless transition in both instances and firmly believe that we
have a strong and motivated senior management team that will continue to generate superior results for
our shareholders.
Kenneth Loeb
Chairman
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
1
(millions of dollars, except per share data)
Revenues
Net Earnings
Earnings Per Share
Backlog
236
227
216
227
193
16.5
2.12
14.1
13.6
13.2
1.84
1.75
1.71
940
924
873
10.5
1.27
702
533
08
09
10
11
12
08
09
10
11
12
08
09
10
11
12
08
09
10
11
12
Comparison of Cumulative Total Return
CTY
$200
$150
$100
$50
S&P/TSX Composite Index
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2
2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Message from the President and CEO
Fiscal 2012 culminates thirty years of business for Calian. From its modest beginnings to the
present day, the business tenets of controlled profitable growth and positive cash flows have
remained strong. This approach has put us in a position to seize opportunities as they arise
while at the same time weather the economic uncertainty that has persisted for the last few
years. I am pleased that our enterprise has withstood the competitive, political and econom-
ic pressures that have touched virtually every entity in today’s marketplace. The diversity of
our two divisions has once again provided stability, not only in their varied service offerings,
but also in the markets that they serve and the geographies in which they operate.
During the past year we continued to experience pressure in all of our markets as existing competitors became more
aggressive and others moved up and down the value chain in an attempt to maximize their share of markets that in some
instances were shrinking. Our continued emphasis on quality and customer satisfaction together with creative solutions
and astute pricing has allowed us to grow and prosper within this environment. As an Ottawa headquartered company, I
was particularly pleased to be honored with the Ottawa Chamber of Commerce’s Company of the Year award which
recognized the same positive business attributes that form the foundation of our long-term success.
Our BTS division had a very eventful year. A fundamental reorganization was implemented which allowed us to take out
non-value added costs while at the same time accurately define our service lines and fortify our sales and business
development resources. The result is a leaner team with a clearer assessment of our target markets and a readiness to
develop and address prospective business. The acquisition of Primacy Management allowed us to round out our health-
care service offerings while at the same time expanding our customer base and enhancing our bottom line. Similarly, the
disposition of our US subsidiary late in the year was driven by the recognition that a Canadian-owned entity in a foreign
military sales environment was not the most productive or profitable use of our valuable resources.
Armed with a healthy backlog of profitable work, our BTS division will continue to provide a stable base of revenues with
excellent long term growth potential and with the organizational realignment behind us, we are fully prepared to address
the divisional challenges that lie ahead.
Our SED division also had a year of unsettled business. Our manufacturing group was plagued with unpredictable require-
ments from our military customers as they addressed their own budget uncertainties. This was evident in an early surge
in requirements only to be met with a reduced level of activity later in the year. Likewise, demand from our commercial
contract manufacturing customers was irregular as they too dealt with intense competition for market share. Our engi-
neering group was well utilized throughout the year as we contended with a high level of project activity for
communication systems as well as ongoing enhancements to our portfolio of ancillary communications products.
While our large contract for the European Space Agency’s 3rd deep space antenna is nearing completion, we are fortu-
nate to have signed a number of contracts with key customers to help fill the gap. Despite our anticipation of continued
tempered markets, our existing base of business along with internal product developments promise a firm level of activ-
ity for the new year.
Overall, we achieved consolidated revenues of $236 million representing an increase of 4% over the prior year. Despite
intense competition and a relatively strong Canadian dollar, we were able to achieve excellent contract execution which
resulted in realized margins that were slightly better than the prior year. This, coupled with close control of operating
costs resulted in earnings of $1.84 per share. This represents an increase of 7% over the prior year, a remarkable feat con-
sidering today’s volatile business environment. Despite the cash used for the Primacy acquisition, we still maintain a
healthy cash balance and we have maintained an excellent rate of return on invested capital.
During the year we once again increased our quarterly dividend which now stands at an annual rate of $1.12 per share.
Cash dividends paid during the year represented a yield in excess of 5% and we plan to continue our policy of paying
dividends at levels commensurate with after tax earnings. Including the reinvestment of dividends, our shareholders have
once again realized an excellent return of 16% for the year, compared to only 6% for the TSX composite index.
During the year, we repurchased 98,000 shares under the
Normal Course Issuer Bid at an average price of $18.52 per
share. We continue to believe that the repurchase of shares at
reasonable prices is an excellent use of cash resources to
enhance shareholder value.
In summary, I am very pleased with the results for 2012 and I
would like to thank our customers, suppliers and employees
who have collectively contributed to this success. Our strong
backlog and solid balance sheet provide our management team
with the basic building blocks to continue generating excep-
tional returns, ultimately translating into a healthy and growing
dividend stream for our shareholders.
Ray Basler
President and CEO
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
3
Report on Operations - Systems Engineering (SED)
The SED division achieved relative success despite the many challenges in 2012. The work
levels in contract manufacturing oscillated during the year due to uncertainties in both the
government and commercial sector. The revenue gap created by the large ESA antenna
contract moving towards completion, was filled by a larger number of smaller antenna
projects. A larger number of active projects presented both management and execution
challenges, particularly with the allocation of resources where multiple international installa-
tions are involved. With extra effort and judiciously adding resources, we were able to execute
our projects without any major technical or schedule implications. Overall, for the fiscal year we recorded revenues of
$67.5 million and a divisional contribution of $10.9 million, or 16.1%.
Manufacturing revenues were slightly improved compared to last year. A brief surge of manufacturing related work in the
first quarter was managed through utilization of a temporary work force. Other manufacturing work continued, albeit at
slightly reduced levels, as customers like Research In Motion slowed orders while they reassessed their market position. By
the end of the fiscal year, work levels rebounded as some of our projects moved to the production phase. Profitability of
the manufacturing business was excellent due to careful management of staff utilization levels, optimization of processes
and favourable vendor pricing.
Satellite service providers expanded into Ku and Ka frequency bands in order to roll out their wide-band satellite commu-
nications networks. The technical challenges associated with designing networks in these frequency bands played to the
strengths of our system engineering capabilities. As a result, Inmarsat’s requirements for their GlobalXpress and Alphasat ini-
tiatives led to several new projects for SED including In-Orbit Test Systems, Diversity RF Systems and Capacity Planning
Software. In addition, customers such as Skywave and Sirius/XM sought to upgrade their existing infrastructure. The sig-
nificant non-labour components of all these programs provided considerable contribution to SED revenues. Staff utilization
was very high within our engineering group as parallel engineering and installation teams were required for concurrent
projects. We continued to see considerable margin pressure, especially on new pursuits as competition intensified.
Fortunately, our history of excellent project performance along with our keen focus on customer satisfaction has allowed
us to partially counteract the competitive pressures. Overall, our engineering projects provided revenues similar to last fiscal
year along with a solid contribution to margin.
In our communications products group, the introduction of a new version of our Decimator Spectrum Analyser product
resulted in increased unit sales. Our Cable Load Generator product established us as a credible supplier to a large test equip-
ment manufacturer with a global reach. In addition, we developed our next generation of satellite modulator under contract
to Echostar, a major satellite service provider. As a result, revenues from our ancillary products continue to grow and there
is a good potential for enhanced margins.
Satellite operations continues to generate a steady stream of profitable business. However, budget constraints within the
Canadian Space Agency resulted in work scope reductions in our satellite operations contract for the Radarsat 1 and Scisat
missions. Maintaining support for Radarsat 1 is critical as it forms the basis for our incremental support to MDA and Telesat
for Radarsat 2 satellite operations. Our business with CEIL and LightSquared continued at similar levels compared to last
fiscal year.
Overall, the resulting revenues for this fiscal year were slightly better than the prior year. With increased labour utilization
and our close attention to operating and administrative costs we achieved a meaningful improvement in divisional contri-
bution for the year.
I am very proud of the performance of the Systems Engineering Division in my inaugural year as General Manager. Our
management team looks forward to the challenges and opportunities of the next fiscal year and we remain fully commit-
ted to customer satisfaction and the profitable execution of all of our projects.
Patrick Thera
VP and General Manager, Systems Engineering
4
2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Report on Operations - Business and Technology Services (BTS)
The Business and Technology Services Division faced numerous challenges in 2012 but I am
happy to report growth in both top and bottom line results. These results were achieved
despite our main customer, the Federal government, going through significant budget reduc-
tions and staff adjustments that resulted in procurement slowdowns primarily in the last half
of the fiscal year.
From a financial perspective, the division’s revenues grew in each quarter compared to the
prior year culminating in record annual revenues of $168 million. Our growth was achieved
by a combination of organic growth and the mid-year acquisition of Primacy. Year over year, we increased divisional con-
tribution by 11% to $10.8 million.
This year included a very significant reorganization of the division. We moved away from our staffing and outsourcing
structure, to a format that encompasses operations, sales and divisional services. Within operations, we established our
selected service lines, being Health, Operations and Maintenance, Information Technology Professional Services and
Training along with respective service line leaders. These operational leaders manage the delivery of contracts in their
respective area and evolve and expand the capabilities of their service lines in support of our growth objectives. We also
consolidated and strengthened our sales team adding additional sales capacity and hiring senior sales executives to lead
the division into new sectors. With the new organization firmly entrenched, we are poised to take advantage of future
opportunities as they arise.
The acquisition of Primacy Management Inc. not only provided a new customer with Loblaw, but it also expanded the
capabilities of our health service line adding expertise in the management of civilian health clinics. We are excited about
ongoing work with Loblaw to deliver health and wellness programs and also leveraging this expertise to enhance the
growth of Calian's presence in the healthcare market. Combined with our Defence military health contract, Calian now
has one of the largest Canadian based medical practitioner networks.
I am also proud of the positive contributions we are making to our customers and of the very high customer satisfaction
ratings that our organization has earned. Whether it is our Operations and Maintenance team repairing military vehicles
to be ready for missions, our Health teams providing healthcare to the men and women of the military, our Primacy team
managing over 100 medical clinics that facilitate over 3 million patient visits a year, our Training team preparing soldiers
for missions or helping them advance their career goals, or finally our IT professional services team working on numer-
ous initiatives to improve or modernize our customers IT infrastructure– we are making a difference!
We have also continued to invest in our back office by implementing numerous process and information system
improvements in support of our growth objectives. Areas such as sales mobility are key enablers to increasing time
with our customers.
Considering the challenging economic environment and a very competitive marketplace, I am pleased with the results
achieved by the BTS division over the past year. Looking forward, we will stay the course on our growth strategy by
expanding our customer base and rounding out our service offerings. We will continue to focus on organic growth oppor-
tunities but will consider potential acquisitions or partnering arrangements that strategically support our long-term
growth objectives. Of course, complete satisfaction of our existing customers will always be paramount. Our strong and
seasoned management team remains committed to the execution of our strategy and to delivering another successful year
for our shareholders.
Kevin Ford
VP and General Manager,
Business & Technology Services
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
5
Business of the Company
We operate through two divisions that complement each other and that share the vision
and key tenet upon which Calian has emerged as a technology services leader — effective
and prudent management with a focus on sustainable growth in carefully selected markets.
The diversity of our service offerings is at the heart of our success. By serving a number of
customers in several different and geographically varied markets, we benefit from a diver-
sity that helps us weather the downturns experienced in any one market and that allows us
to take advantage of unique opportunities as they arise. This diversity is most evident when comparing the business of
our two divisions.
Systems Engineering designs and manufactures complex systems. Our focus is on two distinct markets. Our
primary market is satellite communications sector where we serve satellite manufacturers, operators and service
providers around the world. We also provide satellite operations services to government and commercial clients in the
same market sector. Our other market is in the defence/security and high-end telecommunications industry where we
provide small to medium volume manufacturing services to major players. In both markets, we are a small niche player
serving a handful of multi-national organizations working on large worldwide projects. More than 75% of our annual
revenues are derived from exports.
Our customers require sophisticated, custom-built infrastructure to meet their unique requirements. Our straightfor-
ward approach is to fulfill these requirements by integrating advanced commercial equipment provided from reliable
suppliers and where necessary, custom-built components. Our customers rely on our technical and management skills
to deliver what we promised, on schedule and at the agreed price. We have a full-service approach helping our cus-
tomers from design through to long-term operations and support. Our customers reward our success in meeting their
expectations with repeat business. Our core competencies make us stand out from our competitors — strong project
management, systems engineering know-how, and software development capabilities. We maintain a set of reusable hard-
ware and software components to increase our competitive edge. These strengths have allowed us to establish long-term
relationships with many of the industry’s leaders.
We apply these same core competencies to the manufacturing services we provide to military prime contractors and
equipment suppliers. The value added by our technical expertise and our focus on high-reliability, low-volume produc-
tion of complex systems differentiate our services from those of our competitors.
Business and Technology Services assists clients by providing strategic long-term outsourcing services,
recruiting and placement services, and per-diem staffing services. The division provides ready access to an exception-
al team of professionals in IT Professional Services, Healthcare, Operations and Maintenance and Training domains. The
division currently caters mainly to the Canadian federal government, with a large presence in the Department of
National Defence, and also has a well-established private sector customer base that is expanding across targeted sectors.
The services we offer allow our customers to focus their vital internal resources on key priorities. The value we add lies
in the breadth of services we offer and our ability to source sufficient and appropriate resources on a timely basis to
meet our customers’ requirements. This is due to our exceptional program delivery capability, recruiting capabilities,
effective management of our employees in the field, and competitive rates.
A comparison of the business models and operating approaches of the two divisions further illustrates the diversity
between them.
Contracts in Systems Engineering are technically complex and are typically on a fixed-price basis with demanding
requirements to meet delivery schedules. The division operates essentially under a fixed-cost structure, requiring the
careful management of labour utilization. The majority of revenues are derived from international sources and contracts
are often denominated in foreign currencies. While the risks are high, the margins are commensurate.
Contracts in Business and Technology Services are typically on a per-diem basis and can range from short-term assign-
ments to multi-year operations and maintenance contracts. The cost structure of the division is variable as direct labour
costs are scalable to match contract requirements. The majority of revenues are derived from Canadian sources. With a
reduced risk profile, margins are correspondingly lower.
6
2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Systems Engineering’s billings are based on achieving well defined project milestones. These can be in advance of, or sub-
sequent to the recognition of revenues. Milestone profiles vary depending on factors such as the customer, competition
and pricing. Accordingly, cash flows and working capital requirements can vary significantly from project to project and
over the life of any one project. In Business and Technology Services, cash flows are very predictable as most contracts
call for monthly billings of work performed.
From the perspective of renewing business, Systems Engineering is awarded one project contract at a time, usually as a
result of winning an open international competition. Constant marketing efforts are directed towards identifying and
securing bid opportunities and a significant overhead effort is required to develop detailed proposals for new projects.
The situation is similar for the short-term staffing component of the Business and Technology Services division, which
requires ongoing marketing and sales efforts to maintain the backlog. However, the longer-term outsourcing component
of this division enjoys the benefit of multi-year contracts that often contain provisions for extensions, offering long-term
visibility of future revenues.
Overall, the diversity in markets, customers and business models provides Calian with an enviable balance in its consoli-
dated business.
Management Team
Ray Basler
President and CEO
Jacqueline Gauthier
VP, CFO and Corporate Secretary
Kevin Ford
Patrick Thera
VP and General Manager,
Business & Technology Services
VP and General Manager,
Systems Engineering
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
7
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management Discussion and Analysis is dated December 6, 2012 and should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in this annual report. The Company’s accounting policies are
in accordance with IFRS. As in the consolidated financial statements, all dollar amounts in this Management Discussion and
Analysis are expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.
Forward Looking Statements
The Company cautions that the forward-looking statements in the following Management Discussion and Analysis are based
on certain assumptions made by the Company that may prove to be inaccurate. Forward-looking statements include those
identified by the expressions “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend” and similar expressions to the extent that
they relate to the Company or its management. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but reflect the
Company’s current expectations and assumptions regarding future results or events. Assumptions made include customer
demand for the Company’s services, the Company’s ability to maintain and enhance customer relationships, as well as the
Company’s ability to bring to market it services. Furthermore, the Company cautions that the forward-looking statements in
the following Management Discussion and Analysis are based on current expectations as at December 6, 2012 that are subject
to change and to risks and uncertainties including those set out under the heading “Risk Factors” below. Actual results may
differ due to facts such as customer demand, customer relationships, new service offerings, delivery schedules, revenue mix,
competition, pricing pressure, foreign currency fluctuations and uncertainty in the markets in which the Company conducts
business. Additional information identifying risks and uncertainties is contained in the Company’s filings with the various
provincial securities regulators. Readers should not place undue reliance in the Company’s forward-looking statements.
Business Overview and Strategic Direction
Calian sells technology services to industry and government. For many years, industry and government have searched for and
adopted new operating models and new technologies in an effort to improve the efficiency of their operations. Management
expects that they will continue to do so, and in recognizing this trend, the Company has built a unique combination of spe-
cialized skills and available capable resources in order to address the resulting market opportunities.
With these capable resources at the ready, Calian can quickly assemble and deploy teams of professionals with the requisite
skills to promptly assist customers to implement their diverse operating and technology needs, whether it is the design and
integration of a complex satellite ground system, low-volume high-quality contract manufacturing or the provision of spe-
cialized personnel in the areas of IT, training, health care and operations and maintenance services.
Calian’s larger mainstream competitors often cannot duplicate the timeliness and reliability of Calian’s services. Furthermore,
efficient and flexible operating processes, combined with a strong financial condition allow Calian to profitably address
lower margin business without compromising quality or performance, and this further distinguishes the Company from its
competitors. Due to the Company’s successful delivery and execution of projects, Calian experiences repeat business and a
high percentage of contract renewals.
Calian’s long-term direction is to expand its current service offerings with industry and government in specialized niche
areas outside the mainstream market, avoiding competition with larger competitors. Calian will concentrate on those oppor-
tunities that entail agility and flexibility in both resources and capabilities to address customer requirements, be it in our
traditional markets or new ones with similar needs.
Calian’s growth plans include building upon and expanding its current capabilities and addressing a wider range of cus-
tomers with a broader range of services without compromising its commitment to quality and delivery. Calian plans to
continue augmenting its service offerings and capitalizing on its reputation for delivery, building on its satisfied base of blue-
chip customers. In addition, the Company plans to seek partnership opportunities or acquire specialized companies that
have also had success in profitably addressing niche markets and whose operating philosophies align with those of Calian.
With growing revenues, an efficient back office, and the realization of economies of scale, the Company’s objective is to
enhance the returns to its shareholders and build an enterprise that excels in its selected markets.
For existing operations, the key is controlled profitable growth. Management expects that growth will not only extract
economies of scale and provide additional returns, but will also provide an environment for its people to grow and advance
8
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
within the Company. Calian’s strengths in delivering specialized services in niche markets have so far permitted the Company
to excel in a difficult business environment where many mainstream competitors have faltered. With this backdrop of con-
tinuing to play to our strengths, there are no plans to materially alter the business of the Company.
Calian currently operates in two reportable segments, defined by their primary type of service offerings:
Systems Engineering involves planning, designing and implementing solutions that meet a customer’s specific business and
technical needs, primarily in the satellite communications sector. The Systems Engineering Division, also known as SED, has
its principal office in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
Business and Technology Services is a leading program delivery partner for public and private sector customers in a variety
of industries, whereby we provide workforce augmentation as well as the long-term management of projects, facilities and
customer business processes in the areas of IT professional services, training, health care and operations and maintenance
services. The Business and Technology Services division (BTS) has its principal office in Ottawa, Ontario.
As both of our divisions operate in very specific niche areas within large markets, there exists very little third party data to
compare to the Company’s performance. Although referring to the general market trends provides insight into the health of
those markets and some clarity on the opportunities within those markets, it is not indicative of the health, demand, funding
of the individual customers of the Company. In order to compensate for this limited insight and to provide an indication of
revenue potential, this annual report provides a detailed rollout of the Company’s backlog by division showing both con-
tracted backlog and option renewals by fiscal year.
In addition, since referencing pricing or volumes of production are not applicable to our business to allow a proper under-
standing of the level of revenue generated during the year or expected in the future, the following discussions that refer to
the types of contracts performed by each of the two divisions will provide some insight into the level of customer specific
demand for our services.
Systems Engineering Division
For over 47 years, SED’s core strength has been communications systems engineering. SED builds equipment, systems, and
networks to maximize utilization, efficiency and throughput. Its primary market is the satellite industry, but it also applies
its capabilities and expertise to broader adjacent markets with needs for similar systems and services.
SED is a systems integrator and works with its customers on a project basis to develop custom systems tailored to their spe-
cific operational requirements. From one project to the next, SED attempts to reuse system architecture, core software
modules, and custom hardware designs to reduce development time, cost and technical risks. SED’s manufacturing capabili-
ty, initially created to support its communication systems engineering group, now accounts for a substantial portion of the
revenue base and provides an on-going base of business that helps offset the ebb and flow of core project work.
SED’s strengths are renowned around the world with exports typically accounting for more than 75% of annual sales. This
compares to a Canadian space industry average of 50%. Customers often request deployment of our systems to other loca-
tions. We now have systems operating on six continents and we are well versed in the logistics associated with international
installations.
SED designs and manufactures equipment for the satellite ground-based infrastructure market and systems must be upgrad-
ed or replaced on a regular basis. The introduction of HDTV, the wide acceptance of Digital Audio Radio and the move to
higher frequency bands are also presenting opportunities for additional capacity and enhancements. With recent world
events, demand for reliable mobile communications for disaster relief and satellite news gathering has now become center
stage. Additional demands are being driven by mobile broadcast, military use of commercial satellites and the ongoing need
to replace the existing capacity of satellites approaching end-of-life. Data intensive applications are also driving the need for
high throughput satellite constellations.
Overall, the business environment for the SED division is stable and sustainable. Inmarsat and some other operators are
deploying next generation satellite constellations. This should bode well for integrators such as SED. Reduced credit avail-
ability continues to hamper the ability of start-ups and certain existing players to get the funding or refinancing needed to
drive their initiatives forward. Competition remains fierce as competing companies look to fill their available capacity.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
9
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
While the satellite communications sector has been the core of SED’s business, the contract manufacturing group continues
to provide a solid base of revenues and the ongoing level of work SED receives from several key customers continues to
provide the manufacturing group with respectable levels of utilization. We focus on opportunities requiring low volume and
high reliability manufacturing; qualities that are well suited to defence applications. These attributes also provide effective
immunization from offshore competitors.
In 2012 the SED division performed well signing $70 million in new contracts and ending the year with a backlog of $73
million of which $45 million is expected to be earned during 2013.
Fiscal 2012 had its share of challenges and accomplishments for SED. Manufacturing orders dropped substantially as orders
from customers such as KDS, General Dynamics and RIM were lumpy. Our flexible manufacturing workforce allowed us to
adress the uneven flow and still yield solid margins.
SED's satellite earth station business was also a significant contributor to revenue. The largest project in this area is the third
deep space antenna for the European Space Agency. All design and in-plant integration activities were completed and the con-
struction of the 35m antenna and site integration in Malargue, Argentina is nearing completion. The Inmarsat I5 RF systems
are a three year program and include six 13m antenna systems installed at diverse locations around the globe. We complet-
ed the initial system design and are proceeding with factory acceptance tests and site installation on the first two systems.
Further RF system work signed this year included a new contract for an RF system in Prince Albert for the Canadian Centre
for Remote Sensing, a set of three beacon transmission stations for Yahsat and an Inmarsat BGAN RF System in China.
Work continued on the Mexsat RF Systems for Boeing and we are now proceeding with site installation. In total, this is the
largest number of RF Earth Station programs ever undertaken by SED in a single year. The fact that we can accommodate
this amount of work is a reflection of the depth of our capabilities.
Several satellite gateway system initiatives began this year including the development of a Sirius replacement system, a Safety
Services Gateway for Inmarsat Aeronautical services, additional Inmarsat Aero Gateways and upgrades to the Skywave Low
Data Rate gateway systems. The signing of the Inmarsat GX Capacity Planning project late in the fiscal year will help to ensure
high utilization in our systems and software groups.
Satellite Operations continues to provide a steady revenue stream. We continue to operate the Radarsat I and SciSat Satellites
under contract to CSA and the Radarsat II satellite for MDA. We are the primary operations centre for the Ciel II satellite and
are hosting the LightSquared communications gateway equipment. Reductions in the CSA’s operations budget and the bank-
ruptcy protection filing of LightSquared may result in reduced revenue from this part of the business in the coming years.
We continue to look for opportunities to replenish and expand our operations business.
The markets in which SED operates are currently stable and we expect new opportunities to surface during the years ahead.
In addition our manufacturing base is expected to remain steady but we do expect some volatility over the short term as cus-
tomers assess their upcoming budgets and market conditions. In the Communication business sector, SED expects to work
closely with Inmarsat as they continue to evolve and expand their service offerings, particularly as it relates to their new Ka
Band Global Express Service. In the Digital Audio Broadcast market, we anticipate additional business with Sirius/XM Radio
as they seek to gain commonality in their systems post-merger and also strive to bolster their product offerings. In the test
systems area, we will continue to pursue opportunities with our traditional test systems market for Communications
Monitoring Systems and In-Orbit Test Systems. In addition, we will continue to exploit our Resource Management software
as well as pursue further sales of our ancillary satellite products.
As worldwide competitors continue to vie for market share, margins are expected to remain under pressure. Continued
volatility of the Canadian dollar relative to other major currencies will also weaken our export position.
Business and Technology Services Division
BTS is a leading program delivery partner for public and private sector customers. We meet and anticipate our customers’
unique needs in the areas of IT professional services, training, health care and operations and maintenance services.
10
2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
We have a workforce in excess of 2,100 individuals across Canada, in both full and part-time capacities. Currently our primary
market is the Canadian federal government with an emphasis on the Department of National Defence (DND), but we also
provide services to large multi-national companies as well as to other departments within the federal government.
With 30 years of experience, BTS provides custom solutions that help organizations manage complex workforce challenges
by assuming responsibility for functional tasks, executing sophisticated engineering programs, or by providing workforce
augmentation with flexible and skilled teams. The division’s success comes from its focus on delivering a quality service
through careful attention to both customer and contractor needs. The end result is customers having access to Calian’s exten-
sive expertise and pool of specialized talent so they are free to focus on their core business. BTS is a continuous improvement
organization and is accredited to Level 4 under the Progressive Excellence Program of Excellence Canada.
Over the past several years, we have continued to build and enhance our reputation as a very competent, high quality, but
reasonably priced, supplier. We have consciously focused on niche markets that do not attract significant attention or large
numbers of competitors. This strategy has allowed us to maintain our prices and effectively develop a capability that few of
our competitors can match.
The major market for our BTS division continues to be DND. DND continues to be an area of focus for the federal govern-
ment and its training and health requirements should remain stable. Both of these priorities target areas of expertise within
the division. The BTS division is well positioned to continue to service the government in these areas.
The overriding trends affecting our business are expected to be influenced by four factors: the rate of economic recovery in
our markets; the transition from public sector stimulus spending to one of public sector deficit reduction and expenditure control;
the continuing competitive landscape; and finally the pace of technology evolution and potential impact to our business.
Demographics continue to work in our favour. Due to retirements, large corporations along with various federal government
departments and the military continue to lose large numbers of employees with in-depth knowledge of their internal work-
ings. In many cases the remaining employees are not yet able to assume additional responsibilities. This has created a
necessity for these entities to re-acquire this lost knowledge. The BTS division has placed a special emphasis on attracting
retirees who possess extensive corporate knowledge and expertise, and accordingly has been successful in assisting cus-
tomers in bridging the knowledge gap while they train and mentor replacement staff. At the present time, we continue to
see steady demand for this solution and will continue to take advantage of this trend to provide “ready-made” support
services to our customers.
In order to cope with the backlog of procurement, federal government departments are implementing new processes and
tools. In the Information Technology and Management (IT/IM) arena, the trend to larger, more complex ERP systems
continues. New installations continue to provide opportunities; however system upgrades, enhancements and migrations are
assuming an ever increasing share of the IT/IM budgets and hence our business opportunities. This is particularly the case in
many larger organizations where legacy system databases are being mandated to interface with these ERP systems.
Government wide, there is a greater focus on developing and supporting wider web access coupled with the associated secu-
rity concerns of protecting the users and their data. Accordingly, we continue to focus on related business development
activities and the investment of internal resources to accommodate these new approaches.
While government spending is under tight controls and is slightly unpredictable due to recently announced budget reduc-
tions, profitable business does exist for companies who have the financial strength to weather these down periods and the
discipline to adjust costs to declines in revenue. BTS’s strong back office capabilities, centred on an SAP based management
information system along with its emphasis on continuous improvement and business development ensures that it is able to
identify and win new business opportunities and accommodate that new business in a scalable fashion.
All in all, despite the current competitive landscape, we continue to believe that the long-term business environment for the
services of the BTS division remains favorable.
BTS results for 2012 were solid despite a very difficult business environment. Growth was achieved within a very tough Federal
Government environment and defence customer base. Service offerings have evolved with growing capabilities in many areas.
The division was very successful in terms of managing existing contracts and maintaining high client satisfaction.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report 11
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Federal Government budget reductions had some impact on the Division; however our simulation based training experi-
ence with DND was leveraged to secure our first non-DND contract with a private company in the nuclear field. We are
hopeful that our expansion in this area will provide an opportunity to further broaden these capabilities to attract
additional customers.
The Health Service Support Contract with DND remains stable after securing additional option years through to March 2014.
The acquisition of Primacy during 2012 was a key step in expanding our health service offerings allowing us to acquire not
only a national civilian clinic presence but also a world-class customer with Loblaw. Since Calian acquired Primacy seven
months ago, Primacy opened 9 new clinics and currently operates 110 clinics across Canada. Through Primacy, Calian opened
its first managed clinic in Halifax on October 1, 2012. These activities are key elements in Calian's health strategy which
encompasses a civilian healthcare footprint to augment our military offerings, thereby strengthening our National medical
practitioner network and expanding our health service offerings to our clients.
The IT Professional Services Line (ITPS) had another strong year with better than average growth within all three ITPS geog-
raphies (Toronto, Ottawa and Montreal). However, ongoing market pressures that continue to commoditize and depress
on-demand consulting rates have resulted in a reduction in realized margins.
Our training contracts continued to run strong. The DLSE (Directorate of Synthetic Land Environments) contract continued
to generate organic growth as DND showed increased demand for classroom and simulation-based training. However, the
federal government’s deficit reduction program did dampen realized growth within this service line as other contracts were
moderately affected by these government directives.
The operations and maintenance contracts yielded very positive results this year. The quality of service delivered on the
National Maintenance Contract resulted in our customer increasing its requirement for our services. In addition, performance
evaluations conducted twice a year by our customer resulted in excellent scores yielding improved incentive fees.
During the year, we sold our U.S. based subsidiary. This decision to sell our U.S. business was made due to the arduous Foreign
Ownership, Control and Influence (FOCI) requirements and the inordinate effort and overhead required to manage a
business of this size and scope.
Significant investments were made to increase our sales resources with additional leadership focused on the Health,
Telecommunications and Aerospace & Defence sectors. The goal of these investments is to expand our knowledge of, and
presence within, these sectors as part of the Division's overall diversification strategy.
During 2012, Calian was awarded the "2012 Company of the Year" by the Ottawa Chamber of Commerce directly support-
ing our goal to raise company visibility in the Ottawa region.
In summary, fiscal year 2012 was a respectable year from a results perspective. Although the division faced a difficult envi-
ronment, growth was still achieved in top and bottom line. With the Primacy acquisition and sale of the U.S. based business,
considerable effort and resources were expended in M&A activity and the related integration. Going forward, we expect that
the current Federal Government and defence budget constraints will continue, and therefore, we must focus on new cus-
tomers and service offerings to meet our growth objectives.
BTS enters the new year with a strong backlog of work and a reasonable expectation of good future prospects. In the coming
year, we are expecting organic growth on our existing contracts; however revenue growth from new opportunities will be
largely dependent on the issuance of the initial request and the ultimate timing of the related contract award. A significant
portion of BTS's contracts are not subject to renewal during the upcoming year. This provides for a stable and secure base of
business for fiscal 2013 and allows delivery personnel to focus on increased contract performance, organic contract growth
and support of new business development initiatives.
In the long-term, BTS will continue to focus in areas where it has been successful in the past and will build on newly acquired
expertise to branch out into additional adjacent markets.
12 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Backlog
The Company’s backlog at September 30, 2012 was $553 million with terms extending to fiscal 2018. This compares to $702
million reported at September 30, 2011. Contracted Backlog represents maximum potential revenues remaining to be earned
on signed contracts, whereas Option Renewals represent customers’ options to further extend existing contracts under
similar terms and conditions.
During 2012 the following contracts were the major contributors to the Company’s backlog. These contracts are further
described in the business overview section of this Management Discussion and Analysis.
• $14 million contract with VT iDirect Inc. for backup ground stations for Inmarsat’s new Global Express Ka band system
extending to August 2014;
• $5 million contract with Canada Center for Remote Sensing for the provision of a ground station extending to
June 2013;
• $5 million contract with Inmarsat for the provision of AERO ground earth stations extending to May 2013;
• $5 million contract with General Dynamics Land Systems for the design and provision of power control modules
extending to December 2014;
There were no contracts which were cancelled unexpectedly which resulted in a decrease in our backlog; however the
Company did remove $14,000 in backlog related to the sale of its US subsidiary.
Most fee for service contracts provide the customer with the ability to adjust the timing and level of effort throughout the
contract life and as such the amount actually realized could be materially different from the original contract value. The fol-
lowing table represents management’s best estimate of the backlog realization for 2013, 2014 and beyond based on
management’s current visibility into customers’ existing requirements.
Management’s estimate of the realizable portion (current utilization rates and known customer requirements) is less than the
total value of signed contracts and related options by approximately $116 million. This amount relates to certain government
contracts, such as the health services support contract, where the contract maximums exceed expected utilization rates.
While the excess funding is still available to DND, this was considered an indication that this portion of the contracted
backlog would not materialize. The Company’s policy is to reduce the reported contractual backlog once it receives confir-
mation from the customer that indicates the utilization of the full contract value may not materialize.
Backlog
(dollars in millions)
Contracted Backlog
Option Renewals
TOTAL
Fiscal
2013
$ 168
$
10
Fiscal
2014
69
51
$ 178
$ 120
Business and Technology Services
$ 133
$ 103
Systems Engineering
45
17
Estimated
realizable
portion of
Backlog
Excess over
estimated
realizable
portion
$ 254
183
$ 437
$ 364
73
$
$
$
50
66
116
116
-
Beyond
2014
$
$
$
17
122
139
128
11
TOTAL
$ 304
249
$ 553
$ 480
73
TOTAL
$ 178
$ 120
$
139
$ 437
$
116
$ 553
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
13
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Selected Annual Information
(dollars in millions, except per share data)
Revenues
Net earnings
Net earnings per share, basic
Net earnings per share, diluted
Total assets
Dividends per share
2012 Results of Operations
2012
$ 235.9
$
$
$
14.1
1.84
1.84
$ 103.7
$
1.06
2011
226.7
13.2
1.71
1.71
90.6
0.97
$
$
$
$
$
$
2010
215.7
13.6
1.75
1.75
91.9
1.79
$
$
$
$
$
$
Earnings before interest and income taxes were $18,733 in 2012 compared with $17,446 in 2011 and net earnings were
$14,108 for the year compared with $13,181 in the previous year. The Company completed the year with $31,998 of cash
compared to $30,742 at the end of 2011.
Revenues
SED revenues
BTS revenues
Consolidated revenues
2012
$ 67,515
$ 168,413
$ 235,928
2011
% change
$ 65,716
$ 160,935
$ 226,651
3%
5%
4%
The general business environment in 2012 continued to be very competitive. The Company began the year with $183 million
of its backlog to be earned in 2012. This base of work combined with the win of several larger contracts during 2012
resulted in a solid revenue stream for the year.
SED saw continued stability in the satellite industry and although the project mix has changed, the overall level of activity is
consistent with the previous year. It should be noted that due to the project nature of its business, the SED division is sus-
ceptible to significant variation in volumes of activity from period to period. BTS realized gains in most of its market
segments due to steady activity on contracts and the inclusion of Primacy Management revenues.
The Company derives a significant portion of its revenues from the Government of Canada. During 2012 (2011), 62% (61%)
of revenues were related to contracts with various departments and agencies of the Government of Canada with approxi-
mately 52% (53%) directly with DND. Both of the Company’s divisions conduct business with the Government of Canada.
Management expects that the marketplace over the next year will continue to be very competitive. The market conditions
for SED are expected to be temperate and while new opportunities are expected, the related timing of project awards is
always subject to change. Current BTS backlog will provide a solid level of activity on existing contracts and new opportu-
nities are expected to arise. Cuts in federal government spending will have an impact on future revenues in certain segments,
however, the nature and extent of the spending constraints remain uncertain at this time. The timing of future contract
awards and customer demand will ultimately determine revenues for the next year.
14 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cost of revenues and Gross profit
SED gross profit
As a percentage of SED revenues
BTS gross profit
As a percentage of BTS revenues
Consolidated gross profit
As a percentage of consolidated revenues
2012
$ 16,422
24.3%
$ 28,005
16.6%
$ 44,427
18.8%
2011
% change
$ 15,867
24.1%
$ 26,428
16.4%
$ 42,295
18.7%
4%
6%
4%
The Company’s cost of revenues includes all direct costs incurred in the provision of its products and services. These costs
include all expenses associated with direct full-time staff, contract staff and subcontractors. They also include other direct
costs including the landed cost of hardware and software sold as components of a solution, travel and living expenses
necessary in the delivery of the services, and warranty costs where applicable.
The consolidated gross margin for 2012 was in line with expectations. Higher margins from the Primacy acquisition offset
the negative impact of competitive pressures and the smaller proportion of SED revenues.
Despite the differing margins on various projects, the overall margin percentage for the SED division remained relatively
stable compared to the prior year. Higher staff utilization served to offset some of the competitive market pressures.
The BTS increase in gross margin is primarily related to the addition of Primacy Management which commands higher gross
margins. The traditional BTS business continued to experience pressure on margins when bidding for new work as compe-
tition remains strong.
Because of the significant difference in gross margin between each of the two divisions, the overall gross margin of the
Company is dependent on the relative level of revenue generated from each division. Management will continue to focus on
execution and aggressive negotiation of input costs in order to maximize margins. However, stiff competition is expected to
keep the pressure on margins in both divisions. The volatility of the Canadian dollar is always an influencing factor for
margins on new work in the SED division when denominated in foreign currencies.
Selling and marketing
Selling and marketing
As a percentage of consolidated revenues
2012
$ 4,762
2.0%
2011
$
4,524
2.0%
% change
5%
Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of sales remain stable. Costs for 2013 are expected to remain stable over
the 2012 level.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
15
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General and administration
General and administration
As a percentage of consolidated revenues
2012
$ 17,725
7.5%
2011
$ 16,980
7.5%
% change
4%
General and administration costs in absolute dollars increased slightly in line with cost escalation and increases in revenue.
Looking ahead, management believes that general and administration costs will remain mostly in line with activity levels.
Facilities
Facilities
2012
$ 3,344
2011
$
3,345
% change
0%
Facility expenses, which include costs associated with office space, have been relatively stable over the past several years.
Overall facility costs are not expected to increase significantly in 2013.
Sale of US subsidiary:
On August 31, 2012, the Company sold its US division. The restrictive nature of foreign ownership of US based entities that
perform services for the US and foreign militaries, impacted management’s pursuit of growth for this division and it became
clear that this was not the most productive or profitable use of our valuable resources. Revenues from this division for the last
nine months were $2,841 and the sale of the division is not expected to have any material impact on the results of the Company.
Interest income
Interest income for 2012 is comprised mainly of interest earned on the Company’s cash balances. Interest income decreased
compared to 2011 when the company was accruing interest related to the investment in AIM Health Group Inc. Interest
income earned on cash balances was consistent with the prior year.
Income tax expense
The Company reports its results on a fully taxed basis. The provision for income taxes for 2012 was $4,953 or 26.0% of earn-
ings before income taxes compared to $5,082 or 27.8% of earnings before income taxes in 2011. The decrease in the effective
tax rate for 2012 is mainly the result of a decrease in federal and provincial prescribed income tax rates. The effective tax
rate for 2013, prior to considering the impact of non-taxable transactions, is expected to be approximately 26.5%.
Net earnings
The Company reported net earnings of $14,108 or $1.84 per share basic and diluted for 2012 compared to $13,181 or $1.71
per share basic and diluted in 2011.
16 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Selected Quarterly Financial Data
(dollars in millions, except per share data)
Revenues
Net earnings
Net earnings per share
Basic
Diluted
Q4/12 Q3/12 Q2/12 Q1/12 Q4/11 Q3/11 Q2/11
Q1/11
$ 58.1
$ 59.3
$ 61.6
$ 56.8
$ 55.4
$ 58.5
$ 59.4
$ 53.3
$ 3.4
$ 3.5
$ 3.7
$ 3.6
$ 3.3
$ 3.5
$ 3.3
$ 3.1
$ 0.44
$ 0.44
$ 0.45
$ 0.45
$ 0.48
$ 0.48
$ 0.47
$ 0.47
$ 0.43
$ 0.43
$ 0.45
$ 0.45
$ 0.42
$ 0.42
$ 0.41
$ 0.41
The Company’s operations are subject to some quarterly seasonality due to the timing of vacation periods and statutory
holidays. Typically the Company’s first and last quarter will be negatively impacted as a result of the Christmas season and
summer vacation period. During these periods, the Company can only invoice for work performed and is also required to
pay for statutory holidays. This results in reduced levels of revenues and a drop in gross margins. This seasonality may not be
apparent in the overall results of the Company depending on the impact of the realized sales mix of its various projects.
The full text of the Company’s fourth quarter management discussion and analysis can be found on SEDAR at
www.SEDAR.com.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Calian’s net cash position was $31,998 at September 30, 2012, compared to $30,742 at September 30, 2011.
Cash flows from operating activities before changes in working capital
Changes in working capital
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash flows used for financing activities
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities
Currency translation
Increase in cash
Operating activities
2012
20,172
(4,945)
15,227
(8,899)
(5,018)
(54)
1,256
$
$
2011
18,711
(12,020)
6,691
(8,440)
3,414
22
1,687
$
$
Cash inflows from operating activities for the year ending September 30, 2012 were $15,227 compared to $6,691 in 2011.
This year’s increase is mainly as the result of working capital fluctuations in line with the ebbs and flows of the business and
an increase of $5,366 compared to a decrease of $7,976 in 2011 in unearned revenues. The market for the Systems
Engineering Division is characterized by contracts with billings tied to milestones achieved, which often results in significant
working capital requirements. Conversely, given the nature of this business, it is sometimes possible to negotiate advance pay-
ments on contracts. Such advance payments give rise to unearned revenue that will be realized as revenue over the course
of the contract. As at September 30, 2012, the Company’s total unearned revenue amounted to $13,392. This compares to
$8,026 at September 30, 2011, with the increase primarily attributable to advance milestones on certain contracts.
Financing activities
Dividend
As a result of continuing earnings and a strong cash position, the Company once again increased its dividend in 2012. The
Company paid quarterly dividends totaling $8,137 or $1.06 cents per share compared to 2011 when the Company paid
$7,472 in dividends or $0.97 cents per share. The Company intends to continue with its quarterly dividend policy for the
foreseeable future.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
17
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Shares
During 2012 the Company repurchased 98,000 common shares through its normal course issuer bid at an average price of
$18.52 and during 2011 the Company repurchased 81,600 common shares at an average price of $18.23 through its normal
course issuer bids.
At September 30, 2012 there were 245,000 options outstanding at an average price of $19.85 expiring at various dates
between February 13, 2016 and August 12, 2017.
At September 30, 2012 there were 7,650,657 common shares outstanding and as of the date of this Management Discussion
and Analysis, there were 7,625,587 common shares outstanding.
Investing activities
Equipment expenditures
Calian acquired $1,054 in equipment, furniture and fixtures during 2012, compared to $483 during 2011. For 2013, expen-
ditures are expected to be in line with normal levels which approximate $1,000 per year. At September 30, 2012 there were
no significant commitments to expend capital assets.
Capital resources
At September 30, 2012 the Company had a short-term credit facility of $25,000 with a Canadian chartered bank that bears
interest at prime and is secured by assets of the Company. An amount of $612 was drawn to issue a letter of credit to meet
customer contractual requirements.
Management believes that the company has sufficient cash resources to continue to finance its working capital requirements
and pay a quarterly dividend.
Contractual obligations
Payments due:
Operating leases
Purchase obligations
Total contractual obligations
Total
$ 15,196
17,557
$ 32,753
<1 year
$ 2,263
15,956
$ 18,219
1-3 years
$ 4,223
1,601
$ 5,824
4-5 years
$ 4,012
-
$ 4,012
>5 years
$ 4,698
-
$ 4,698
Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods and services that are enforceable and legally binding. They do
not include agreements that are cancellable without penalty.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There were no off-balance sheet arrangements at September 30, 2012.
Operating leases
The Company leases various premises and office equipment through operating leases.
Related party transactions
There were no transactions with related parties during 2012 and 2011.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. On an on-going basis, management reviews its esti-
mates and assumptions, including those related to revenue recognition on fixed-price projects, provisions and contingencies,
estimated timing of reversals of income tax temporary differences, allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of investment
and impairment of goodwill. Management bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other
factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances; actual results could differ from those estimates.
18
2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Revenue recognition
The Business and Technology Services Division’s revenue is derived primarily from per-diem contracts where revenue is
recognized when the services are provided. However, a significant portion of the Systems Engineering Division’s revenue is
derived from fixed-price contracts. Revenue from these fixed-price projects is recognized using the percentage of completion
method using management’s best estimate of the costs and related risks associated with completing the projects. The greatest
risk on fixed-price contracts is the possibility of cost overruns. Management’s approach to revenue recognition is tightly linked
to detailed project management processes and controls. The information provided by the project management system com-
bined with a knowledgeable assessment of technical complexities and risks are used in estimating the percentage completion.
Contingencies
From time to time the Company is involved in claims in the normal course of business. Management assesses such claims
and where considered likely to result in a material exposure and, where the amount of the claim is quantifiable, provisions
for loss are made based on management’s assessment of the likely outcome. The Company does not provide for claims that
are considered unlikely to result in a significant loss, claims for which the outcome is not determinable or claims where the
amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated. Any settlements or awards under such claims are provided for when rea-
sonably determinable.
Income taxes
The Company records future income tax assets and liabilities related to deductible temporary differences. The Company
assesses the value of these assets and liabilities based on their probability of being realized given management assessments of
future taxable income.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
The Company has extensive commercial history upon which to base its provision for doubtful accounts. Due to the nature
of the industry in which the Company operates, the Company does not create a general provision for bad debts but rather
determines bad debts on a specific account basis. Due to the blue-chip list of customers, the Company’s allowance for doubt-
ful accounts at September 30, 2012 and 2011 was minimal.
Goodwill
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually or more frequently when events occur or circumstances arise that could indicate
a reduction in its fair value. Testing for impairment is accomplished by determining whether the fair value of the cash gen-
erating unit exceeds the net carrying value as of the assessment date. If the fair value is greater than the carrying amount, no
impairment is necessary. The determination of fair value is based on management’s estimate of future results of operations of
the reporting unit using reasonable assumptions relating to growth levels when considering the current and forecasted busi-
ness environment and each cash-generating unit’s discount rate. For purpose of determining fair value, management
considered a growth level range of 0% to 3% and a discount rate range of 13% to 16% for its BTS division excluding Primacy
and a growth level range of 0% to 15% and a discount rate range of 25% to 30% for its Primacy division.
Adoption of New Accounting Rules and Impact on Financial Results
The Company did not adopt any new accounting policies this year.
International Financial reporting Standards
The consolidated financial statements included herein reflect the adoption of IFRS, with effect from October 1, 2010. Periods
prior to October 1, 2010 have not been restated and were in accordance with Canadian GAAP which, as discussed in the con-
solidated financial statements, was applied during the periods prior to the effective date of the Company’s adoption of IFRS.
Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements contains a detailed description of the Company's conversion to IFRS, includ-
ing a reconciliation of key components of its financial statements previously prepared under Canadian GAAP to those under
IFRS as at and for the year ending September 30, 2011. Although the adoption of IFRS resulted in adjustments to the
Company's financial statements, it did not materially impact the underlying cash flows or profitability.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report 19
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Impact of Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented
There were no new accounting pronouncements issued in 2012 other than the adoption of IFRS which would affect the
Company's results of operations or financial conditions.
Management’s Conclusion on the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls
The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, after evaluating the effectiveness of the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2012, have concluded that the Company's disclosure con-
trols and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its
consolidated subsidiaries would have been known to them and that information required to be disclosed by the Company
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the securities legislation.
Management’s Conclusion on the Effectiveness of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, after evaluating the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012, have concluded that the Company’s internal
controls over financial reporting provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external pur-
poses in accordance with Canadian GAAP.
During the most recent interim quarter ending September 30, 2012, there have been no changes in the design of the
Company's internal controls over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.
Risk Factors
The Company is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect the Company’s financial con-
dition and future results of operations. Risk management is an integral part of how the Company plans and monitors the
business strategies and results and we have embedded risk management activities in the operational responsibilities of man-
agement and made them an integral part of our overall governance, organizational and accountability structure. The Systems
Engineering and Business and Technology Services divisions face some or all of the following risks and uncertainties:
Competition for contracts within key markets
The markets for the Company’s services are intensely competitive, rapidly evolving and subject to technological changes. The
principal competitive factors in the Company’s markets are quality, performance, price, timeliness, customer support and
reputation. The Company has a disciplined approach to management of all aspects of its business. The Company is a propo-
nent of quality management; SED is registered under ISO 9001-2008 standards and BTS is accredited at Level 4 of the
Progressive Excellence Program by the National Quality Institute (now known as Excellence Canada). This approach to man-
agement was developed to help the Company ensure that its employees deliver services consistently according to the
Company’s high standards and based on strong values underlying its client-focused culture.
The availability of qualified professionals
Competition from other firms has a two-fold impact on the Company. The Company must not only vie for qualified employ-
ees for its own operations but must have ready access to a large pool of qualified professionals to satisfy contractual
arrangements with customers. The Company mitigates these factors through a number of means. The Company’s perform-
ance driven remuneration policies and its favorable working environment are conducive to attracting ambitious, qualified
professionals. As a supplier of professional employees through outsourcing contracts, the Company regularly establishes rela-
tionships with a significant number of professionals in key markets. While SED revenues are predominately export, its labour
costs are largely influenced by domestic and regional economic factors. Accordingly, labour costs could become significant-
ly higher than those of foreign competitors, thereby eroding our competitive position.
20
2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Performance on fixed-price contracts
A large percentage of SED’s contracts are based on a fixed price for the provision of a specified service or system against an
agreed delivery schedule. These fixed-price contracts at times involve the completion of large-scale system engineering
projects. There is a risk in all fixed-price contracts that the Company will be unable to deliver the system within the time
specified and at the expected cost. The Company employs sophisticated design and testing processes and practices, which
include a wide range of stringent factory and on-site acceptance tests with criteria and requirements jointly developed with
the customer. However, non-performance could result in a customer being in a position to terminate the contract for default,
or to demand repayments or penalties. Program management methodologies have been implemented to adequately manage
each project and any customer change, and to identify and mitigate potential technical risks and related cost overruns. In
addition, the Company employs procedures to ensure accurate estimating of costs and performs regular detailed reviews of
progress on each project.
Non-performance of a key supplier or contractor
The Company’s business is often dependent on performance by third parties and subcontractors for completion of contracts
for which the Company is the prime contractor. Subcontractors for large systems are selected in concurrence with the cus-
tomer’s requirements, and if not directed by the customer, are selected through a competitive bid or negotiated process. Most
major development subcontracts are established as fixed-price contracts. The Company believes that these subcontractors
have an economic incentive to perform such subcontracts for the Company. However, no company can protect itself against
all material breaches, particularly those related to financial insolvency of the subcontractors or to cost overruns by subcon-
tractors. Risks include a significant price increase in those few subcontracts that are not fixed-price, delay in performance,
failure of any major subcontractor to perform or the inability of the Company to obtain replacement subcontractors at a rea-
sonable price. The performance of key subcontracts is closely monitored as part of the Company’s project management
process to promptly identify potential issues and develop remedial actions.
Rapidly changing technologies and customer demands
The markets in which the Company operates are characterized by changing technology and evolving industry standards. The
Company keeps pace with developments in the industries it serves and actively monitors the evolution of these markets, thus
ensuring that it can meet the evolving needs of its clients. The Company achieves this by continually recruiting profession-
als in high demand positions and providing regular training to ensure employee skills remain current. The Company’s ability
to anticipate changes in technology, technical standards and service offerings will be a significant factor in the Company’s
ability to compete or expand into new markets.
Customer’s ability to retain their market share
The Company performs manufacturing services for a number of customers, whereby we build their products to meet their
market demands. While these relationships are long-standing, the Company is susceptible to overall shifts in market demand
for such products as well as our customers’ share of such markets. While the Company has regular discussions with cus-
tomers regarding upcoming requirements, an erosion of a customer’s market share for a particular product could have a
direct impact on the Company’s revenues and profitability.
Government contracts
During 2012, approximately 62% of the Company’s total revenues were derived from contracts with the Canadian govern-
ment and its agencies. The government may change its policies, priorities or funding levels through agency or program budget
reductions or impose budgetary constraints. Furthermore, contracts with governments, including the Canadian government,
may be terminated or suspended by the government at any time, with or without cause. Although in the past the Company
has not experienced any significant cancellations of previously awarded contracts by the Canadian government, there can be
no assurance that any contract with the government will not be terminated or suspended in the future.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report 21
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Backlog
Most fee for service contracts provide the customer with the ability to adjust the timing and level of effort throughout the
contract life and as such the amount actually realized could be materially different from the original contract value. At
September 30, 2012 the Company’s backlog included $116 million of contract value in excess of the current estimated uti-
lization levels. Should additional customer requirements for the Company’s services under these contracts not materialize,
this excess will not be realized.
Credit risk concentration with respect to accounts receivable
As the Company grows, it monitors the concentration of its business in its various segments and with particular customers.
In management’s opinion, the fact that the Company operates in two segments that provide some diversification of its cus-
tomer base mitigates the potential impact on earnings and cash flow of problems related to an individual sector or customer.
Insufficient or inappropriate mix of work for fixed labour resources
Virtually all employees of SED are full time staff and represent a broad spectrum of unique skill sets. Accordingly, SED strives
to secure sufficient labour sales that adequately match the skill sets. SED’s business development practices are designed to
dynamically adjust pursuits of contracts to address the sufficiency and mix of available resources.
Operational risk
Operational risk is managed through the establishment of effective infrastructure and controls. Key elements of the infra-
structure are qualified, well-trained personnel, clear authorization levels and reliable technology. Controls established by
documented policies and procedures include the regular examination of internal controls by internal employees as well as
our auditors, segregation of duties, and financial management and reporting. In addition, the Company maintains insurance
coverage and contingency plans for systems failures or catastrophic events.
Foreign currency risk
The Company operates internationally with approximately 22% of its business derived from non-Canadian sources. A sub-
stantial portion of this international business is denominated in major foreign currencies and therefore the Company’s results
from operations are affected by exchange rate fluctuations of these currencies relative to the Canadian dollar. The Company
uses financial instruments, principally in the form of forward exchange contracts, in its management of foreign currency
exposures. At September 30, 2012 the Company had various forward exchange contracts, which are explained in Note 20 to
the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2012. The strengthening of the Canadian
dollar relative to other foreign currencies may negatively impact the Company’s competitiveness and increase pressure on
margins for new work.
Sufficiency of insurance
The Company carries various forms of insurance to protect itself from a variety of insurable risks. However, such coverage
may not be sufficient in extreme circumstances and accordingly there exists a risk to the Company. While the Company
cannot reasonably insure itself for all events, it regularly reviews the availability, scope and amounts of coverage with its pro-
fessional advisors and implements an approach balancing both cost and risk.
Medical malpractice
As a result of the Company executing the health services support contract for the Department of National Defence, the
Company is subject to risks associated with the medical profession. In order to mitigate such risks to the degree possible, the
Company has obtained medical malpractice and professional liability insurance in accordance with the terms of this contract.
In addition, it is a condition of employment for doctors, dentists and other medical professionals to maintain appropriate cre-
dentials, be in good standing with their medical associations and obtain medical malpractice insurance from their respective
association.
22
2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Political and trade barriers
Revenues on certain projects are derived from customers in foreign jurisdictions and are subject to trade and political bar-
riers relating to the protection of national interests. These barriers could have an adverse effect on our ability to win repeat
business and attract new customers.
Consolidation of customer base
The satellite industry has experienced both restructuring and consolidation. As the newly formed entities focus on optimiz-
ing cash flows and gaining economies of scale, opportunities for systems integrators may be diminished thereby creating a
very competitive environment with commensurate pressure on margins.
Long-term Outlook
Management believes the Company is well positioned for sustained growth. The Company operates in markets that will con-
tinue to require the services that the Company offers. To further assure itself of a stable source of revenues, the Company
will continue to focus on increasing the percentage of its revenues derived from recurring business while pursuing new
business in adjacent markets.
The Systems Engineering Division has been working within a stable satellite sector and the division is expecting new oppor-
tunities to arise as systems adopting the latest technologies will be required by customers to maintain and improve their
service offerings. Custom manufacturing activity levels will continue to be directly dependent upon SED’s customers’ require-
ments. The continued volatility of the Canadian dollar could impact the Systems Engineering Division’s competitiveness
when bidding against foreign competition on projects denominated in foreign currencies.
The Business and Technology Services Division’s services are adaptable to many different markets. Currently, its strength lies
in providing program management and delivery services to the Department of National Defence. Management believes that
this department and many others within the federal government will continue to require support services from private enter-
prises to supplement their current workforce, however the federal government’s current cost cutting initiatives could have
a negative impact on demand, at least in the short-term. Management believes that the types of service the division offers will
continue to be attractive to government agencies in the long term and the division continues to assess how it can adress new
markets and increase the availability of new opportunities. The acquisition of Primacy Management has bolstered the divi-
sion’s performance and it is expected that Primacy will continue to meet the financial targets established as part of
the acquisition.
Additional Information
Additional information about the Company such as the Company’s 2012 Annual Information Form and Management Circular
can be found on SEDAR at www.SEDAR.com
Dated: December 6, 2012
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report 23
Management’s Statement of Responsibility
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Calian Technologies Ltd. and its subsidiaries and all information in
the annual report are the responsibility of management and have been approved by the Board of Directors.
The financial statements include some amounts that are based on management’s best estimates that have been made using
careful judgment.
The financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in Canada. Financial and operating data elsewhere in the annual report are consistent with the information contained in the
financial statements.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, management of Calian and its subsidiaries has developed and continues to maintain systems
of internal accounting controls including written policies and procedures and segregation of duties and responsibilities.
Although no cost-effective system of internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and irregularities, these systems are
designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded from loss or unauthorized use, transactions are
properly recorded and the financial records are reliable for preparing the financial statements.
The Board of Directors carries out its responsibility for the financial statements in this report through its Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee meets periodically with management to discuss the results of audit examinations with respect to the
adequacy of internal controls and to review and discuss the financial statements and financial reporting matters. The Audit
Committee also meets periodically with the external auditors to review and discuss the financial statements and financial
reporting matters.
The financial statements have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, Chartered Accountants, who have full access to the
Audit Committee with and without the presence of management.
Ray Basler
President and CEO
Ottawa, Ontario
November 14, 2012
Jacqueline Gauthier
Chief Financial Officer
24
2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Shareholders of Calian Technologies Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Calian Technologies Ltd., which comprise the con-
solidated statements of financial position as at September 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and October 1, 2010, and the
consolidated statements of net earnings, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of
changes in equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2012 and September 30,
2011, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accor-
dance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and for such internal control as management determines is
necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted
our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated finan-
cial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of
material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assess-
ments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated
financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose
of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appro-
priateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Calian
Technologies Ltd. as at September 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and October 1, 2010, and its financial performance and its
cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards.
Chartered Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
November 14, 2012
Ottawa, Ontario
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report 25
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
As at September 30, 2012 and 2011 and October 1, 2010
(Canadian dollars in thousands)
NOTES
September 30,
2012
September 30,
2011
(Note 25)
October 1,
2010
(Note 25)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash
Accounts receivable
Work in process
Prepaid expenses
Derivative assets
Investment
Total current assets
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Deferred tax assets
Investment
Equipment
Application software
Acquired intangibles
Goodwill
Total non-current assets
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Unearned contract revenue
Share repurchase obligation
Derivative liabilities
Total current liabilities
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Deferred tax liabilities
Total non-current liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Issued capital
Contributed surplus
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
11
11
Total shareholder’s equity
5
20
6
15
6
7
8
9
10
16
11
20
15
$
31,998
40,928
9,446
1,480
234
-
84,086
-
-
3,854
615
4,352
10,781
19,602
$
30,742
35,181
6,960
2,751
451
-
76,085
480
-
4,069
440
-
9,518
14,507
$
103,688
$
90,592
$
19,853
13,392
1,209
26
34,480
1,212
1,212
35,692
19,949
164
47,186
697
67,996
$
18,594
8,026
562
1,054
28,236
-
-
28,236
19,018
219
43,345
(226)
62,356
$
$
$
29,055
33,954
3,576
6,329
158
953
74,025
696
2,464
4,611
543
-
9,518
17,832
91,857
17,024
16,002
1,315
48
34,389
-
-
34,389
18,511
171
38,275
511
57,468
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
$
103,688
$
90,592
$
91,857
Approved by the Board
on November 14, 2012:
26
2012 Annual Report
Kenneth Loeb
Chairman
Richard Vickers
Director
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Net Earnings
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Revenues
Cost of revenues
Gross profit
Selling and marketing
General and administration
Facilities
Gain on sale of US subsidiary
Earnings before interest income and income tax expense
Interest income
Earnings before income tax expense
Income tax expense – current
Income tax expense – deferred
Total income tax expense
NET EARNINGS
Net earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
NOTES
$
2012
235,928
191,501
$
2011
226,651
184,356
44,427
4,762
17,725
3,344
(137)
18,733
328
19,061
4,810
143
4,953
42,295
4,524
16,980
3,345
-
17,446
817
18,263
4,557
525
5,082
22
14
15
15
$
14,108
$
13,181
13
13
$
$
1.84
1.84
$
$
1.71
1.71
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report 27
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands)
NET EARNINGS
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Unrealized (loss) gain on translating financial statements of an
investment in a foreign operations, net of tax of nil (2011 – nil)
Change in deferred gain (loss) on derivatives designated as cash
flow hedges, net of tax of $349 (2011 - $312)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
NOTES
2012
2011
$
14,108
$ 13,181
(54)
945
891
22
(759)
(737)
$
14,999
$ 12,444
28
2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Notes
Issued Contributed Retained
earnings
surplus
capital
Foreign
currency
translation
reserve
Cash flow
hedging
reserve
Total
Balance October 1, 2011
(Note 25) $ 19,018
$
219
$ 43,345
$
Comprehensive income
Sale of US subsidiary
Dividend paid ($1.06 per share)
Issue of shares under employee
share purchase plan
Issue of shares under stock
option plan
Share-based compensation
expense
Share repurchase
Share purchase agreement -
reclassification
11
11,12
12
11
11
-
-
418
844
-
(249)
(82)
-
-
-
(142)
87
-
-
14,108
(8,137)
-
-
-
(1,565)
(565)
Balance September 30, 2012
$ 19,949
$
164
$ 47,186
$
22
(54)
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
(248)
$ 62,356
945
14,999
32
(8,137)
418
702
87
(1,814)
(647)
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
697
$ 67,996
Notes
Issued Contributed Retained
earnings
surplus
capital
Foreign
currency
translation
reserve
Cash flow
hedging
reserve
Total
Balance October 1, 2010
(Note 25) $ 18,511
$
171
$ 38,275
$
Comprehensive income
Dividend paid ($0.97 per share)
Issue of shares under employee
share purchase plan
Issue of shares under stock
option plan
Share-based compensation
expense
Share repurchase
Share purchase agreement -
reclassification
11
11,12
11,12
11
11
-
-
384
218
-
(200)
105
-
-
-
(21)
69
-
-
13,181
(7,472)
-
-
-
(1,287)
648
-
22
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
511
$ 57,468
(759)
-
-
-
-
-
-
12,444
(7,472)
384
197
69
(1,487)
753
Balance September 30, 2011
$ 19,018
$
219
$ 43,345
$
22
$
(248)
$ 62,356
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
29
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands)
NOTES
2012
2011
$
14,108
$ 13,181
14
15
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net earnings
Items not affecting cash:
Interest income
Income tax expense
Employee stock purchase plan and share-based compensation expense
Amortization
Gain on sale of US subsidiary
Change in non-cash working capital
Accounts receivable
Work in process
Prepaid expenses
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Unearned contract revenue
Interest received
Income tax paid
CASH FLOWS USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of common shares
Dividends
Repurchase of shares
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Equipment and application software expenditures
Acquisition of Primacy Management Inc.
Sale of US subsidiary
Proceeds from repayment of debenture
11,12
11
7,8
21
22
6
FOREIGN CURRENCY ADJUSTMENT
NET CASH INFLOW
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
CASH, END OF PERIOD
(328)
4,953
158
1,418
(137)
20,172
(6,162)
(2,612)
2,035
899
5,367
19,699
310
(4,782)
15,227
1,052
(8,137)
(1,814)
(8,899)
(1,054)
(4,112)
148
-
(5,018)
(54)
1,256
30,742
(817)
5,082
137
1,128
-
18,711
(1,294)
(3,384)
3,578
1,403
(7,976)
11,038
338
(4,685)
6,691
519
(7,472)
(1,487)
(8,440)
(483)
-
-
3,897
3,414
22
1,687
29,055
$
31,998
$ 30,742
30 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. Basis of preparation
Calian Technologies Ltd. (“the Company”), incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act, and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries provide technology services to industry and government. The address of its registered office and principal place
of business is 340 Legget Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2K 1Y6. The Company's capabilities include the provision of business and
technology services to industry and government in the health, operations and maintenance, IT services and training domains
as well as the design, manufacturing and maintenance of complex systems to the communications and defence sectors.
Statement of compliance
These consolidated financial statements are expressed in Canadian dollars and have been prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting Standard Board (“IASB”).
These consolidated financial statements are the first annual financial statements prepared under IFRS and were prepared
using the accounting policies as described in Note 2 – Summary of significant accounting policies. These accounting poli-
cies were retrospectively applied unless otherwise noted below.
Note 25 – Transition to IFRS explains how the transition from previous Canadian generally accepted accounting principles
(“GAAP”) to IFRS affected the Company's reported financial position as at October 1, 2010 and September 30, 2011, as well
as the financial performance and cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2011.
These consolidated financial statements for year ended September 30, 2012 were authorized for issuance by the Board of
Directors on November 14, 2012.
2. Summary of significant accounting policies
The accounting policies below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated financial state-
ments unless otherwise stated.
Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Calian Ltd.
located in Ottawa, Ontario and Primacy Management Inc. (“Primacy”) located in Burlington, Ontario as well as Calian
Technology (US) Ltd. until the date of sale (Note 22). All transactions and balances between these companies have been elim-
inated on consolidation.
Basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements are presented at historical cost unless otherwise noted. Historical cost is generally
based on the fair value of the consideration given in exchange for the asset.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Revenue from a contract to provide
services is recognized by reference to the stage of completion of the contract. The stage of completion of the contract is
determined as follows:
Fixed price contracts
Where the outcome of fixed-price construction contracts can be estimated reliably, revenue is recognized by reference
to the completed activity of the contract as at each reporting period, measured based on the proportion of the costs
incurred for work performed to date relative to the estimated total contract costs including warranty costs where appli-
cable, except where this would not be representative of the stage of completion. As some contracts extend over more
than one year, any revision in cost and profit estimates made during the course of the work is reflected in the account-
ing period in which the facts indicating a need for the revision become known. Variations in contract work, claims and
incentive payments if any, are included to the extent that the amount can be measured reliably and its receipt is con-
sidered probable.
Where the outcome of fixed-price construction contracts cannot be estimated reliably, contract revenue is recognized
to the extent of contract costs incurred that it is probable will be recoverable. Contract costs are recognized as
expenses in the period they are incurred.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
31
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
When it is probable that total contract costs will exceed total contract revenue, the expected loss is recognized as an
expense immediately.
Where contract costs incurred to date plus recognized profits less recognized losses exceed progress billings, the surplus
is shown as work in process. For contracts where progress billings exceed contract costs incurred to date plus recognized
profits less recognized losses, the surplus is shown as unearned contract revenue. Amounts received before the related
work is performed are included in the consolidated statement of financial position, as a liability, as unearned contract
revenue. Amounts billed for work performed but not yet paid by the customer are included in the consolidated statement
of financial position under accounts receivable.
Time and material contracts
Revenue derived from time and material contracts is recognized at the contractual rates as labour hours are delivered and
direct expenses are incurred. Variations in revenue incentive payments if any are included to the extent that the amount can
be measured reliably and its receipt is considered probable.
Share-based compensation
The Company has a stock option plan for executives and other key employees. The Company measures and recognizes com-
pensation expense based on the grant date fair-value of the stock options issued using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The
offsetting credit is recorded in contributed surplus. Compensation expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period, based on the Company’s estimate of stock options that will ultimately vest. At each reporting period, the Company
revises its estimate of the stock options expected to vest. The impact on the change in estimate, if any, is recognized over the
remaining vesting period. Consideration paid by employees on the exercise of options and related amounts of contributed
surplus is recorded as issued capital when the shares are issued.
The Company has an employee stock purchase plan available to all employees of the Company. The plan provides for a dis-
count to the fair market value at the date the shares are issued. Compensation expense representing the discount is recorded
as general and administration costs with an offsetting amount to issued capital.
Operating leases
Leases entered into are classified as either finance or operating leases. Leases that transfer substantially all of the risks and
rewards of ownership of property to the Company are accounted for as finance leases. For leases which are classified as
operating leases, lease payments are recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. In the event that lease
incentives are received to enter into operating leases, such incentives are recognized as a liability. The aggregate benefit of incen-
tives is recognized as a reduction of rental expense on a straight-line basis. The Company does not have any finance leases.
Current monetary assets and liabilities
Cash is measured at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in net earnings. Accounts receivable and accounts payable
and accrued liabilities are measured at amortized costs with interest accretion recorded in net earnings. Due to the short-term
nature of these assets and liabilities, the carrying amounts approximate fair value.
Income taxes
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is recognized in net earnings, except when it
relates to items that are recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, in which case, the current and
deferred tax are also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity respectively. Where current tax or
deferred tax arises from the initial accounting for a business combination, the tax effect is included in the accounting for the
business combination.
Current tax
The tax currently payable is based on taxable income for the period using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted as at
each reporting period and any adjustments to tax payable related to previous years. Taxable profit differs from profit as
reported in the consolidated statement of net earnings because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable
or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible.
32 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Deferred tax
Deferred tax is recognized using the balance sheet method, providing for differences between the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the corresponding tax bases used for taxation purposes.
Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognized for all taxable temporary differences, and deferred tax assets are gener-
ally recognized for all deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be
available against which those deductible temporary differences can be utilized. Such assets and liabilities are not recog-
nized if the temporary difference arises from goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business
combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries,
except where the Company is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the tem-
porary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary
differences associated with such investments are only recognized to the extent that it is probable that there will be suf-
ficient taxable profits against which to utilize the benefits of the temporary differences and they are expected to reverse
in the foreseeable future.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting period and reduced to the extent that it is no
longer probable that sufficient taxable income will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period in which the liability is
settled or the asset realized, based on tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted at each reporting period.
The measurement of deferred tax liabilities and assets reflects the tax consequences that would follow from the manner
in which the Company expects, at the reporting date, to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities.
Equipment
Equipment, comprising leasehold improvements, furniture and computer equipment is stated at cost less accumulated amor-
tization and impairment losses, if any. The carrying value is net of related government assistance and investment tax credits.
The cost of equipment at October 1, 2010, the date of transition to IFRS, was determined by reference to its amortized cost
at that date.
Amortization is recognized in net earnings on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold
improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases. The estimated useful lives for the current and
comparative period are as follows:
•Leasehold improvements:
•Furniture:
•Computer equipment:
over the term of each lease
10 years
5 years
The estimated useful lives, residual values and depreciation methods are reviewed annually, with the effect of any changes
in estimate accounted for on a prospective basis.
Application software
Application software is measured at cost less accumulated amortization and is amortized on a straight-line basis over its esti-
mated useful life not exceeding five years. The amortization method and estimate of useful life is reviewed annually.
Acquired intangibles
Acquired intangibles are measured at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is recognized in net earnings on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis
over the term of the leases. The estimated useful lives for the current and comparative period are as follows:
•Customer relationship:
•Contract with customer:
•Non-competition agreements:
indefinite
5 years
7 years
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
33
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
The customer relationship, representing expected renewals of the acquired contract, is considered to have an indefinite life
based on the fact that the contract is renewable on an annual basis indefinitely. The amortization method and estimate of
useful life is reviewed annually.
Impairment of equipment and application software
At each reporting period, management reviews the carrying amounts of its equipment and application software to determine
whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recov-
erable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss, if any. Where it is not possible
to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, management estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-gener-
ating unit to which the asset belongs. Where a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified, corporate
assets are also allocated to individual cash-generating units.
Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future
cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the
time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.
If the recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying
amount of the asset or cash-generating unit is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognized immedi-
ately in profit or loss.
Impairment of goodwill
Goodwill arising on the acquisition of a business represents the excess of the purchase price over the net fair value of iden-
tifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquired businesses recognized at the date of the acquisition.
Goodwill is initially recognized as an asset at cost and is subsequently measured at cost less any accumulated impairment
losses. For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to the cash-generating units expected to benefit from the
synergies of the combination. Cash-generating units to which goodwill has been allocated are tested for impairment
annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the unit might be impaired.
When the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit, the
impairment loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the unit and then to the other
assets of the cash-generating unit on pro-rata basis. An impairment loss recognized for goodwill is not reversed in a subse-
quent period. The Company performs its annual review of goodwill on September 30th each year.
Business acquisition
Acquisitions of businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method. The consideration transferred in a business com-
bination is measured at fair value, which is calculated as the sum of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets transferred
by the Company, liabilities incurred by the Company to the former owners of the acquiree in exchange for control of the
acquiree. Acquisition-related costs are generally recognised in profit or loss as incurred.
At the acquisition date, the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed are recognised at their fair value, except
that deferred tax assets or liabilities are recognised and measured in accordance with IAS 12 Income Taxes.
Goodwill is measured as the excess of the sum of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interests
in the acquiree, and the fair value of the acquirer's previously held equity interest in the acquiree (if any) over the net of the
acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. If, after reassessment, the net of the
acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed exceeds the sum of the consideration
transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree and the fair value of the acquirer's previously held
interest in the acquiree (if any), the excess is recognised immediately in profit or loss as a bargain purchase gain.
When the consideration transferred by the Company in a business combination includes assets or liabilities resulting from a
contingent consideration arrangement, the contingent consideration is measured at its acquisition-date fair value and
included as part of the consideration transferred in a business combination. Changes in the fair value of the contingent
consideration that qualify as measurement period adjustments are adjusted retrospectively, with corresponding adjustments
34 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
against goodwill. Measurement period adjustments are adjustments that arise from additional information obtained during
the ‘measurement period’ (which cannot exceed one year from the acquisition date) about facts and circumstances that
existed at the acquisition date.
Foreign currency translation
Transactions in currencies other than the Company’s functional currency (foreign currencies) are recorded at the rates of
exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates
for the period, unless exchange rates fluctuated significantly during that period, in which case the exchange rates at the dates
of the transactions are used. At each reporting period, monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at
the rates prevailing at each reporting period. Non-monetary items which are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign
currency are not retranslated. Exchange differences are recognized in net earnings in the period in which they arise except
for exchange differences on transactions entered into in order to hedge certain foreign currencies (see note below for
hedging policy).
The functional currency of the parent company, Calian Ltd. and Primacy Management Inc., its subsidiaries, is the Canadian
dollar. The functional currency of Calian Technology (US) Ltd., is the US dollar. For the purpose of presenting consolidated
financial statements, the assets and liabilities of the Company’s wholly-owned foreign operation until its sale (see Note 22)
are expressed in Canadian dollars using US dollar exchange rates prevailing at each reporting period. Income and expense
items are translated at the average exchange rates for the period, unless exchange rates fluctuated significantly during that
period, in which case the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions are used. Exchange differences arising are classified
in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity in the Company’s foreign currency translation adjustment
reserve. Such exchange differences are recognized in net earnings in the period in which the foreign operation is disposed.
Financial instruments
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognized when the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of
the instrument.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are initially measured at fair value. Transaction costs that are directly attributable to
the acquisition or issue of financial assets and financial liabilities (other than financial assets and financial liabilities at fair
value through profit or loss) are added to or deducted from the fair value of the financial assets or financial liabilities, as
appropriate, on initial recognition. Transaction costs directly attributable to the acquisition of financial assets or financial lia-
bilities at fair value through profit or loss are recognized immediately in profit or loss.
Financial assets
The classification of financial assets depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined at the time
of initial recognition. The Company’s financial assets are classified as follows:
Cash
Accounts receivable
Derivative assets
Fair value through profit or loss
Loans and receivables
Fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL)
Financial assets are classified as at FVTPL if they are held for trading or are designated as such upon initial recognition.
Financial assets at FVTPL are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net earnings.
Loans and receivables
Accounts receivable are classified as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables are measured at amortized cost using the
effective interest method, less any impairment. Interest income is recognized by applying the effective interest rate, except
for short-term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
35
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Impairment of financial assets
Financial assets, other than those at FVTPL, are assessed for indicators of impairment at each reporting period. Financial assets
are impaired where there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recog-
nition of the financial asset, the estimated future cash flows of the investment have been impacted. Objective evidence of
impairment could include significant financial difficulty of the issuer or counterparty, default or delinquency in interest or
principal payments or it becoming probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or financial re-organization.
Accounts receivable are assessed for impairment individually. Objective evidence of impairment could include the
Company’s past experience of collecting payments and an increase in the number of delayed payments past the average
credit period.
For financial assets carried at amortized cost, the amount of the impairment is the difference between the asset’s carrying
amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate.
Impairment losses, if any, are recognized in net earnings. The carrying amount of the financial asset is reduced by the impair-
ment loss directly for all financial assets with the exception of accounts receivable, where the carrying amount is reduced
through the use of an allowance account. When a trade receivable is considered uncollectible, it is written off against the
allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the allowance account.
Changes in the carrying amount of the allowance account are recognized in net earnings, if any. If in a subsequent period,
the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the
impairment was recognized, the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed through net earnings to the extent that
the carrying amount of the investment at the date the impairment is reversed does not exceed what the amortized cost
would have been had the impairment not been recognized.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are classified as either financial liabilities at FVTPL or other financial liabilities. The Company’s trade
payables and share purchase obligations are classified as other financial liabilities and are initially measured at fair value and
are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, with interest expense recognized on an
effective yield basis. Derivative liabilities are classified as FVTPL.
Effective interest method
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial asset (or financial liability) and of
allocating interest income over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated
future cash receipts (cash disbursements), including all fees on points paid or received that form an integral part of the effec-
tive interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts, through the expected life of the financial asset or
financial liability, or, where appropriate, a shorter period.
Fair value hierarchy
The Company’s fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The three levels
of the fair value hierarchy are:
Level 1 values are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for
identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either
directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant
to the overall fair value measurement.
When the inputs used to measure fair value fall within more than one level of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair
value measurement is categorized is based on the Company’s assessment of the lowest level input that is the most significant
to the fair value measurement.
36 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Derivative financial instruments and risk management
The Company enters into derivative financial instruments, mainly foreign exchange forward contracts to manage its foreign
exchange rate risk. The Company’s policy does not allow management to enter into derivative financial instruments for
trading or speculative purposes. Foreign exchange forward contracts are entered into to manage the foreign exchange rate
risk on foreign denominated financial assets and liabilities and foreign denominated forecasted transactions.
Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value at the date a derivative contract is entered into with transaction costs recog-
nized in profit and loss. Derivatives are subsequently re-measured to their fair value at each reporting period. The resulting
gain or loss is recognized in net earnings immediately unless the derivative is designated and effective as a hedging instru-
ment, in which event the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in other comprehensive
income and is recognized in net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings. The Company expenses transaction
costs related to its foreign exchange contracts. Fair value of the forward exchange contracts reflects the cash flows due to
or from the Company if settlement had taken place at the end of the period. A derivative is presented as a non-current asset
or a non-current liability if the remaining maturity of the instrument is more than 12 months and it is not expected to be
realized or settled within 12 months.
Hedge accounting
Management designates its foreign exchange forward contracts as either hedges of the fair value of recognized assets or lia-
bilities (fair value hedges) or hedges of highly probable forecast transactions and firm commitments (cash flow hedges).
At the inception of the hedge relationship, the Company documents the relationship between the hedging instruments and
the hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions.
Furthermore, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, the Company also assesses whether the derivatives that
are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in net earnings imme-
diately, together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged item that are attributable to the hedged risk. The change in
the fair value of the hedging instrument and the change in the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in
the line of the income statement relating to the hedged item.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are
deferred in other comprehensive income and accumulated under the heading of cash flow hedging reserve. The gain or loss
relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in net earnings, and is included in other gains and losses, if any.
Amounts deferred in other comprehensive income are recycled in net earnings in the periods when the hedged item is
recognized in net earnings, in the same line of the income statement as the recognized hedged item. However, when the fore-
cast transaction that is hedged results in the recognition of a non-financial asset or a non-financial liability, the gains and losses
previously deferred in other comprehensive income are transferred from other comprehensive income and included in the
initial measurement of the cost of the asset or liability.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when management revokes the hedging relationship; the hedging instrument is
terminated or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. For fair value hedges, the adjustment to the carrying amount of the
hedged item arising from the hedged risk is amortized to net earnings from that date. For cash flow hedges, any cumulative gain
or loss deferred in other comprehensive income at that time remains in other comprehensive income and is recognized when
the forecast transaction is ultimately recognized in net earnings. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the
cumulative gain or loss that was deferred in other comprehensive income is recognized immediately in net earnings.
Note 20 sets out details of the fair values of the derivative instruments used for hedging purposes. Movements in the hedging
reserve in equity are also detailed in the statement of changes in equity.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
37
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
3. Future changes in accounting policies
IFRS 9 Financial instruments
IFRS 9 was issued in November 2009 introducing new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial
assets. IFRS 9 was further amended in October 2010 to include the requirements for the classification and measurement of
financial liabilities and derecognition.
IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value, replacing
the multiple rules in IAS 39. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial instruments in the context
of its business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets. The new standard also requires a
single impairment method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. IFRS 9 is effective for annual
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015. The Company as not yet assessed the impact of this standard on its consoli-
dated financial statements.
IFRS 10 Consolidated financial statements
IFRS 10 establishes principles for the presentation of consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more
other entities. IFRS 10 replaces IAS 27 – Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements and is effective for annual periods
beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Earlier application is permitted. The Company as not yet assessed the impact of this
standard on its consolidated financial statements.
IFRS 12 Disclosure of interests in other entities
IFRS 12 is a new and comprehensive standard on disclosure requirements for all forms of interests in other entities, includ-
ing joint arrangements, associates, special purpose vehicles and other off-balance sheet vehicles. The standard requires an
entity to disclose information regarding the nature and risks associated with its interests in other entities and the effects of
those interests on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows. IFRS 12 will be effective for the Company’s
fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with earlier application permitted. The Company has not yet assessed the
impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
IFRS 13 Fair value measurement
IFRS 13 is intended to improve consistency and reduce complexity by providing a precise definition of fair value and a single
source of fair value measurement and disclosure requirements for use across IFRS. The standard will be effective for the
Company’s fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with earlier application permitted. The Company has not yet
assessed the impact of the adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.
IAS 1 Presentation of financial statements
In June 2011, the IASB amended IAS 1 – Presentation of financial statements. The principal change resulting from the amend-
ments to IAS 1 is a requirement to group together items within other comprehensive income that may be reclassified to the
statement of income. The amendments also reaffirm existing requirements that items in other comprehensive income and
net earnings should be presented as either a single statement or two consecutive statements. The amendment to IAS 1 will
be effective for the Company’s fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with earlier application permitted. The
Company does not expect any changes to its consolidated financial statement presentation from this amendment as the items
within other comprehensive income that may be reclassified to the statement of comprehensive income are already grouped
together.
IAS 28 Investments in associates and joint ventures
IAS 28 was re-issued by the IASB in May 2011 in order to conform to changes as a result of the issuance of IFRS 10, IFRS11,
and IFRS 12. IAS 28 continues to prescribe the accounting for investments in associates, but is now the only source of guid-
ance describing the application of the equity method. The amended IAS 28 will be applied by all entities that are investors
with joint control of, or significant influence over, an investee. The amended version of IAS 28 is effective for financial years
beginning on or after January 1, 2013, with earlier application permitted. The Company as not yet assessed the impact of the
amendments to IAS 28 on its consolidated financial statements.
38 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
4. Critical accounting judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty
Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the Company’s management to make judgments,
estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods presented. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Purchase price allocation
As described in Note 21 of these financial statements, the Company acquired Primacy Management Inc. As a result of this
acquisition, management was required to estimate the fair values of each identifiable asset and liability acquired through the
acquisition. Fair value of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and equipment were estimated to approximate their
carrying values in Primacy's records at the date of the transaction. The fair values of the intangibles were valued using the
excess earnings method under the income approach.
Percentage completion on revenue
A significant portion of the Systems Engineering Division’s revenue is derived from fixed-price contracts. Revenue from these
fixed-price projects is recognized using the percentage of completion method using management’s best estimate of the costs
and related risks associated with completing the projects. The greatest risk on fixed-price contracts is the possibility of cost
overruns. Management’s approach to revenue recognition is tightly linked to detailed project management processes and
controls. The information provided by the project management system combined with a knowledgeable assessment of tech-
nical complexities and risks are used in estimating the percentage completion.
Impairment of goodwill
Determining whether goodwill is impaired requires an estimation of the value in use of the cash-generating units to which
goodwill has been allocated. The value in use calculation requires management to estimate the future cash flows expected
to arise from the cash-generating unit and a suitable discount rate in order to calculate present value.
Income taxes
The Company records deferred income tax assets and liabilities related to deductible or taxable temporary differences. The
Company assesses the value of these assets and liabilities based on the likelihood of the realization as well as the timing of
reversal given management assessments of future taxable income.
Contingent liabilities
From time to time the Company is involved in claims in the normal course of business. Management assesses such claims
and where considered probable to result in a material exposure and, where the amount of the claim can be measured reli-
ably, provisions for loss are made based on management’s assessment of the likely outcome.
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable
The Company has extensive commercial history upon which to base its provision for doubtful accounts receivable. Due to
the nature of the industry in which the Company operates, the Company does not create a general provision for bad debts
but rather determines bad debts on a specific account basis.
For the years ended September 30, 2012, September 30, 2011 and October 1, 2010, no material changes in estimates have
been made.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
39
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
4. Critical accounting judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty (continued)
Judgments:
Financial instruments
The Company's accounting policy with regards to financial instruments is described in Note 2. In applying this policy, judg-
ments are made in applying the criteria set out in IAS 39 – Financial instruments: recognition and measurement, to record
financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss, and the assessments of the classification of financial instruments and
effectiveness of hedging relationships.
Accounting policy for equipment
Management makes judgments in determining the most appropriate methodology for amortizing assets over their useful
lives. The method chosen is intended to mirror, to the best extent possible, the consumption of the asset.
Deferred income taxes
The Company's accounting policy with regards to income taxes is described in Note 2. In applying this policy, judgments are
made in determining the probability of whether deductions or tax credits can be utilized and related timing of such items.
Determination of functional currency
To enable translation of foreign currency transactions of foreign operations, IFRS require an assessment of the basis or unit
of measure, or what is termed the “functional currency” under IFRS. IAS 21 – The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange
Rates sets out factors to be considered in determining whether the functional currency of a foreign operation is the same as
that of the reporting entity of which it is a subsidiary, branch, associate or joint venture. The Company determined the func-
tional currency of the parent company, its subsidiaries and divisions thereof, is Canadian dollars, with the exception of Calian
Technology (U.S.) Ltd., whose functional currency is the US dollar.
Percentage complete methodology
The Company uses judgment in determining the most appropriate basis on which to determine percentage of completion.
Options available to the Company include the proportion that contract costs incurred for work performed to date bear to
the estimated total contract costs, surveys of work performed and completion of a physical proportion of the contract work.
While the Company considers the costs to complete, the stage of completion is assessed based upon the assessment of the
proportion of the contract completed. Judgments are also made in determining what costs are project costs for determin-
ing percentage complete.
5. Prepaid expenses
Prepaid operating expenses
Milestone advance to subcontractors
September 30,
2012
September 30,
2011
$
$
1,480
-
1,480
$
$
1,233
1,518
2,751
October 1,
2010
$
705
5,624
$
6,329
6. Investment
In 2006, the Company invested $3,623 in Med-Emerg International Inc. which was subsequently merged with AIM Health
Group Inc. During 2011, the full amount of the debenture was repaid.
40 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
7. Equipment
Leasehold
improvements
Equipment
and furniture
September 30, 2012
September 30, 2011
October 1, 2010
Cost Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Book
Value
Cost Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Book
Value
Cost
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Book
Value
$ 1,501
$
632
$
869
$ 1,462
$
483
$
979
$ 1,478
$
340
$ 1,138
10,318
7,333
2,985
9,856
6,766
3,090
9,546
6,073
3,473
$ 11,819
$ 7,965
$ 3,854
$ 11,318
$ 7,249
$ 4,069
$ 11,024
$ 6,413
$ 4,611
8. Application software
September 30, 2012
September 30, 2011
October 1, 2010
Cost Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Book
Value
Cost Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Book
Value
Cost
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Book
Value
Application
software
$ 2,423
$ 1,808
$
615
$ 2,250
$ 1,810
$
440
$ 2,195
$ 1,652
$
543
9. Acquired intangibles
Acquired intangibles are allocated to the Primacy cash-generating unit.
September 30, 2012
Cost
Accumulated
Net Book
Amortization
Value
Customer relationship
$ 1,909
$
-
$ 1,909
Contract with customer
Non-competition agreements
2,574
187
301
17
2,273
170
Total
$ 4,670
$ 318
$ 4,352
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
41
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
10. Goodwill
Business and
Technology Services
Primacy
Goodwill
September 30, 2012
Cost
Impairment
$ 9,518
1,263
$10,781
$
$
-
-
-
Carrying
amount
$ 9,518
1,263
$ 10,781
September 30, 2011
and October 1, 2010
Cost
Impairment
Carrying
amount
$ 9,518
-
$ 9,518
$
$
-
-
-
$ 9,518
-
$ 9,518
Annual test for impairment
Goodwill recorded is allocated in its entirety to the Business and Technology Services division. At September 30, 2012 and
2011, management assessed the recoverable amount of goodwill and concluded that a goodwill impairment charge was not
required. The recoverable amounts of the relevant cash-generating units were assessed by reference to value in use.
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the following key assumptions were used in arriving at value in use for
each cash-generating unit. Outlooks for the next three years were used as the basis for the future cash flow estimates and
the future estimated growth rates were validated by comparing to average growth levels for the previous 5 years.
Business and Technology Services (excluding Primacy) 13% to 16%
0 to 3%
Primacy
25% to 30%
0 to 15%
Discount
factors
Growth
rates
11. Issued capital and reserves
Issued capital
Authorized: Unlimited number of common shares, no par value
Unlimited number of preferred shares issuable in series, no par value
Issued: Common shares as follows:
Balance, beginning of year
Shares issued under stock option plan
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
Shares repurchased for cash
Balance, end of year
Share purchase obligation
Issued capital
September 30, 2012
September 30, 2011
Shares
Amount
Shares
7,669,983
$ 19,018
7,706,895
55,000
23,674
(98,000)
844
418
(249)
21,800
22,888
(81,600)
7,650,657
20,031
7,669,983
-
(82)
-
Amount
$ 18,511
218
384
(200)
18,913
105
7,650,657
$ 19,949
7 ,669,983
$ 19,018
42 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
11. Issued capital and reserves (continued)
Share repurchase
During 2012 (2011), the Company acquired 98,000 (81,600) of its outstanding common shares at an average price of $18.52
($18.23) per share for a total of $1,814 ($1,487) including related expenses, through normal course issuer bids in place during
the periods. The excess of the purchase price over the stated capital of the shares has been charged to retained earnings.
Subsequent to the date of the statement of financial position, on November 14, 2012, the date of issuance of these consoli-
dated financial statements, the Company declared a dividend of $0.28 per common share payable on December 12, 2012.
Share repurchase obligation
The Company has an agreement with a third party which provides for automatic repurchases of the Company’s shares
without the Company having the ability to influence the purchases. The financial liability is determined as the present value
of the maximum redemption amount at each of the reporting periods. The reclassification adjustment is made by reducing
issued capital and retained earnings with an offsetting adjustment to the share repurchase obligation account. An income
adjustment will result for any shares repurchased below the maximum amount per share. The amount of income recognized
in each reporting period is insignificant.
Contributed surplus
Contributed surplus comprises the value of share-based compensation expense related to options granted that have not been
exercised or have expired unexercised.
Foreign currency translation reserve
The translation reserve comprises all foreign currency differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of
the Company’s US operations prior to its sale (Note 22).
Cash flow hedging reserve
The hedging reserve comprises the effective portion of the cumulative net change in the fair value of cash flow hedging
instruments related to forecasted transactions.
12. Share-based compensation
Stock Options
The Company has an established stock option plan, which provides that the Board of Directors may grant stock options to
eligible directors and employees. Under the plan eligible directors and employees are granted the right to purchase shares
of common stock at a price established by the Board of Directors on the date the options are granted but in no circumstances
below the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant. A total of 500,000 common shares have been authorized for
issuance under the plan and 500,000 (345,000) have been issued as of September 30, 2012 (2011). No consideration is
payable on the grant of an option.
The following share-based payment arrangements were in existence during the current and comparative reporting periods:
Option series:
Number
Grant date
Expiry date
price
Exercise Fair value at
grant date
(1) Issued February 5, 2007
(2) Issued August 22, 2007
(3) Issued November 18, 2008
(4) Issued February 14, 2011
80,000
85,000
85,000
95,000
February 5, 2007
February 4, 2012
August 22, 2007
August 21, 2012
November 18, 2008
November 17, 2013
February 14, 2011
February 13, 2016
(5) Issued August 13, 2012
155,000
August 13, 2012
August 12, 2017
$ 13.47
$ 13.00
$ 9.05
$ 18.65
$ 20.54
$ 2.98
$ 2.64
$ 0.96
$ 1.27
$ 0.99
For the option issuance dated February 5, 2007, 43,200 options vested immediately with the remaining vesting through to
February 5, 2009.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
43
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
12. Share-based compensation (continued)
For the option issuance dated August 22, 2007, 48,200 options vested immediately with the remaining vesting through to
August 22, 2009.
For the option issuance dated November 18, 2008, 24,200 options vested immediately with the remaining vesting through
to November 18, 2010.
For the option issuance dated February 14, 2011, 28,000 options vested immediately with the remaining vesting through to
February 14, 2013.
For the option issuance dated August 13, 2012, 49,000 options vested immediately with the remaining vesting through to
August 13, 2014.
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year ended September 30, 2012 (2011) was $0.99 ($1.27) per
option calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Where relevant, the expected life of the options was based on
historical data for similar issuance and adjusted based on management’s best estimate for the effects of non-transferability,
restrictions and behavioural considerations. Expected volatility is based on historical price volatility over the past 5 years. To
allow for the effects of early exercise, it was assumed that options would be exercised on average 2.9 years after vesting.
The following assumptions were used to determine the fair value of each series of options granted during the year:
Grant date share price
Exercise price
Expected price volatility
Expected option life
Expected dividend yield
Risk-free interest rate
Forfeiture rate
$ 20.54
$ 20.54
15.1%
2.9 yrs
5.4%
1.2%
0%
Outstanding, beginning of year
Exercised
Expired
Granted
Outstanding, end of year
September 30, 2012
September 30, 2011
Number of
Options
Weighted Avg.
Exercise Price
Number of
Options
Weighted Avg.
Exercise Price
150,000
(55,000)
(5,000)
155,000
245,000
$ 16.49
$ 12.77
$ 18.65
$ 20.54
$ 19.85
76,800
(21,800)
-
95,000
150,000
$ 11.71
$
$
9.05
-
$ 18.65
$ 16.49
At September 30, 2012 there were 245,000 options outstanding with a weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.4
years of which 118,000 were exercisable at a weighted average price of $19.43.
Employee stock purchase plan
The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") under which most full-time employees may register once a year
to participate in one of two offering periods. Eligible employees may purchase common shares by payroll deduction
throughout the year at a price of 80% of the fair market value at the beginning of the initial offering period or may purchase
common shares at a price of 90% of the fair market value at the beginning of the interim offering period. Such shares are
issued from treasury once a year at the end of the offering periods.
A total of 500,000 common shares have been authorized for issuance under the plan. During 2012 (2011), the Company
issued 23,674 (22,888) shares under the ESPP at an average price of $14.76 ($14.06) and employees subscribed to approxi-
mately 24,600 common shares, which will be issued during fiscal 2013 at an average price of $15.10. Since inception and
including the issuance of shares in 2012, 344,112 shares have been issued under the plan. During 2012 (2011), the Company
recorded compensation expense of $72 ($68) relating to its ESPP.
44 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
13. Earnings per share
The diluted weighted average number of shares has been calculated as follows:
Weighted average number of common shares – basic
Additions to reflect the dilutive effect of employee stock options
Weighted average number of common shares – diluted
2012
7,655,092
7,004
7,662,096
2011
7,697,217
17,948
7,715,165
Options that are anti-dilutive because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares are
not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. For 2012 (2011), 155,000 (95,000) options were excluded from
the above computation of diluted weighted average number of common shares because they were anti-dilutive.
Net earnings is the measure of profit or loss used to calculate earnings per share.
14. Interest income
Interest income is comprised of the following amounts:
Interest earned on cash balances
Interest earned on investment
Accreted interest on contingent consideration
Accreted interest on host contract component of investment
Interest income
2012
310
-
18
-
328
$
$
2011
301
36
-
480
817
$
$
15. Income taxes
The following table reconciles the difference between the income taxes that would result solely by applying statutory tax
rates to pre-tax income and the reported income tax expenses:
Earnings before income taxes
Tax provision at the combined basic Canadian federal
and provincial income tax rate of 27.0% (2011: 28.8%)
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
Effect of expenses that are not deductible in determining taxable profits
Impact of rate reductions on valuation of deferred income tax assets
Other
2012
$19,061
5,146
36
(68)
(161)
2011
$ 18,263
5,260
12
42
(232)
Income tax expense
$ 4,953
$ 5,082
The effective income tax rate in the year was 27.0% compared to 28.8% in the prior year. The decrease is attributable to a
decrease in federal and provincial enacted income tax rates.
The movements of deferred tax assets and liabilities are shown below:
Deferred tax assets (liabilities)
Deferred tax assets at September 30, 2011
Acquisitions / disposal
(Expensed) credited to income statement
(Expensed) credited to equity
Deferred tax liabilities at September 30, 2012
Equipment
and Software
application
$
$
(215)
-
(10)
-
(225)
Tax Reserve
$
$
669
-
(193)
-
476
Acquired
intangibles
$
-
(1,214)
61
-
$ (1,153)
Hedging
Total
$
$
26
-
-
(336)
(310)
$
480
(1,214)
(142)
(336)
$ (1,212)
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
45
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
15. Income taxes (continued)
Deferred tax assets (liabilities)
Equipment
and Software
application
Acquired
intangibles
Tax Reserve
Deferred tax assets at September 30, 2010
(Expensed) credited to income statement
(Expensed) credited to equity
Deferred tax assets at September 30, 2011
$
$
1,168
(499)
-
669
$
$
(182)
(33)
-
(215)
$
$
-
-
-
-
Hedging
$
$
(290)
-
316
26
$
$
Total
696
(532)
316
480
16. Construction contracts
Construction contract revenues recorded during the period ended September 30, 2012 is $67,515 (2011: $65,716) all of
which is from the Systems Engineering division.
Contract in progress at the balance sheet date:
Construction costs incurred plus recognized profits
less recognized losses to date
Less: progress billings
Recognized and included in the financial statements as amounts due:
From customers under construction contracts
To customers under construction contracts
September 30
2012
$
$
103,310
(107,726)
(4,416)
September 30
2012
$
$
8,976
(13,392)
(4,416)
September 30
2011
$
$
71,904
(73,514)
(1,610)
September 30
2011
$
$
6,416
(8,026)
(1,610)
At September 30, 2012 (2011), advances received from customers for contract work amounted to $13,392 ($8,026).
17. Commitments
The Company has non-cancellable lease agreements for office space and equipment with terms extending to the year 2020.
The aggregate minimum rental payments under these arrangements are as follows:
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
thereafter
Total
$
2,263
2,156
2,067
2,031
1,981
4,698
$ 15,196
18. Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company is party to employee related claims. The potential outcomes related to exist-
ing matters faced by the Company are not determinable at this time. The Company intends to defend these actions, and
management believes that the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
financial condition.
46 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
19. Segmented information
Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial informa-
tion is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, regarding how to allocate resources and assess
performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer.
The Company operates in two reportable segments described below, defined by their primary type of service offer-
ing, namely Systems Engineering and Business and Technology Services.
• Systems Engineering involves planning, designing and implementing solutions that meet a customer’s specific
business and technical needs, primarily in the satellite communications sector.
• Business and Technology Services involves short and long-term placements of personnel to augment customers’
workforces as well as the long-term management of projects, facilities and customer business processes. This
segment includes the new acquisition, Primacy Management Inc.
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on earnings before interest and income taxes. The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2. Revenues reported below represents
revenue generated from external customers. There were no significant inter-segment sales in the year.
For the year ended September 30, 2012
Systems
Engineering
Business and
Technology
Services
Corporate
Total
$
67,515
$ 168,413
$
-
$ 235,928
56,635
157,734
2,963
217,332
137
137
$
10,880
$
10,816
$
(2,963)
$
18,733
Revenues
Operating expenses
Gain on sale of US subsidiary
Earnings before interest income and income
tax expense
Interest income (Note 14)
Income tax expense (Note 15)
Net earnings
Total assets other than cash and goodwill
$
23,753
$
36,277
Goodwill
Cash
Total assets
Equipment and application software expenditures
Acquired intangibles (Note 21)
Acquired goodwill (Note 21)
-
-
23,753
529
-
-
$
$
$
$
10,781
-
47,058
525
4,670
1,263
$
$
$
$
328
(4,953)
$
14,108
$
60,909
10,781
31,998
$ 103,688
$
$
$
1,054
4,670
1,263
$
$
$
$
$
879
-
31,998
32,877
-
-
-
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
47
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
19. Segmented information (continued)
For the year ended September 30, 2011
Revenues
Operating Expenses
Earnings before interest income and income
tax expense
Interest income (Note 14)
Income tax expense (Note 15)
Net earnings
Total assets other than cash and goodwill
Goodwill
Cash
Total assets
Equipment and application software expenditures
Systems
Engineering
Business and
Technology
Services
Corporate
Total
$
65,716
$ 160,935
$
-
$ 226,651
55,459
151,181
2,565
209,205
$
10,257
$
9,754
$
(2,565)
$
17,446
$
$
$
16,257
-
-
16,257
352
$
$
$
33,962
9,518
-
43,480
131
$
$
$
113
-
30,742
30,855
-
817
(5,082)
13,181
50,332
9,518
30,742
90,592
483
$
$
$
$
The Company operates in Canada but provides services to customers in various countries. Revenues from external cus-
tomers are attributed as follows:
Canada
United States
Europe
2012
78%
13%
9%
2011
78%
12%
10%
Revenues are attributed to foreign countries based on the location of the customer. No assets are held outside of
Canada. Revenues from various departments and agencies of the Canadian federal government for the year ended
September 30, 2012 and 2011 represented 62% (61%) of the Company’s total revenues. Both operating segments conduct
business with this major customer.
20. Financial instruments and risk management
Capital Risk Management
The Company’s objective is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confi-
dence and to sustain future development of the business and provide the ability to continue as a going concern.
Management defines capital as the Company’s shareholders’ equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income
relating to cash flow hedges. The Company does not have any debt and therefore net earnings generated from operations
are available for reinvestment in the Company or distribution to the Company’s shareholders. The Board of Directors does
not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management; but rather promotes year over year sustainable profitable
growth. The Board of Directors also reviews on a quarterly basis the level of dividends paid to the Company’s shareholders
and monitors the share repurchase program activities. The Company does not have a defined share repurchase plan and buy
and sell decisions are made on a specific transaction basis and depend on market prices and regulatory restrictions.
There were no changes in the Company’s approach to capital management during the period. Neither the Company
nor any of its subsidiaries is subject to externally imposed capital requirements.
48 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
20. Financial instruments and risk management (continued)
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates and interest rates will affect the
Company’s income or the value of its holding of financial instruments.
Foreign currency risk related to contracts
The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations on its cash balance, accounts receivable, accounts payable and
future cash flows related to contracts denominated in a foreign currency. Future cash flows will be realized over the life of
the contracts. The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments, principally in the form of forward exchange contracts,
in the management of its foreign currency exposures. The Company’s objective is to manage and control exposures and
secure the Company’s profitability on existing contracts and therefore, the Company’s policy is to hedge 100% of its foreign
currency exposure excluding its exposure arising from the Company’s US subsidiary. The Company does not utilize deriva-
tive financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company applies hedge accounting when appropriate
documentation and effectiveness criteria are met. The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging
instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transac-
tions. This process includes linking all derivatives to specific firm contractually related commitments on projects. The
Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used
in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. Hedge inef-
fectiveness has historically been insignificant.
The forward foreign exchange contracts primarily require the Company to purchase or sell certain foreign currencies with
or for Canadian dollars at contractual rates. At September 30, 2012, the Company had the following forward foreign exchange
contracts:
Type
Notional
Currency
Equivalent
Maturity
Cdn. Dollars
Fair Value
September 30,
2012
SELL
SELL
SELL
BUY
BUY
BUY
Derivative assets
SELL
SELL
Derivative liabilities
1,000
1,000
1,000
17,565
1,977
38
36,790
5,158
USD
USD
USD
USD
EURO
GPB
USD
EURO
September 2015
$
September 2016
September 2017
October 2012
October 2012
October 2012
1,057
1,057
1,057
17,258
2,497
60
October 2012
$ 36,148
October 2012
6,517
$
$
$
$
74
74
74
12
-
-
234
24
2
26
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
49
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
20. Financial instruments and risk management (continued)
At September 30, 2011, the Company had the following forward foreign exchange contracts:
Type
Notional
Currency
Equivalent
Maturity
Cdn. Dollars
Fair Value
September 30,
2011
SELL
SELL
SELL
BUY
BUY
BUY
Derivative assets
SELL
SELL
Derivative liabilities
1,000
1,000
1,000
14,295
3,829
167
35,703
10,249
USD
USD
USD
USD
EURO
GPB
USD
EURO
September 2015
$
September 2016
September 2017
October 2011
October 2011
October 2011
1,057
1,057
1,057
14,613
5,329
268
October 2011
$ 36,497
October 2011
14,265
At October 1, 2010, the Company had the following forward foreign exchange contracts:
Type
Notional
Currency
SELL
SELL
SELL
SELL
BUY
Derivative assets
BUY
SELL
BUY
Derivative liabilities
1,000
1,000
1,000
19,628
6,563
4,065
12,262
98
USD
USD
USD
USD
EURO
USD
EURO
GPB
Equivalent
Maturity
Cdn. Dollars
September 2015
$
September 2016
September 2017
October 2010
October 2010
1,057
1,057
1,057
20,252
9,189
October 2010
$
4,194
October 2010
October 2010
17,168
160
$
$
$
9
9
9
371
48
5
451
927
127
$ 1,054
Fair Value
September 30,
2010
$
$
$
$
28
28
28
56
18
158
11
35
2
48
A 10% strengthening (weakening) of the Canadian dollar against the following currency at September 30, 2012 would have
decreased (increased) other comprehensive income by the amounts shown below.
September 30, 2012
USD
EURO
GBP
$ 2,185
(401)
6
$ 1,790
50 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
20. Financial instruments and risk management (continued)
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet
its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Company’s accounts receivable and its foreign exchange contracts.
The Company’s exposure to credit risk with its customers is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each cus-
tomer. The Company’s customers are for the most part, federal and provincial government departments and large private
companies. A significant portion of the Company’s accounts receivable is from long-time customers. At September 30, 2012
(2011 and October 1, 2010), 59% (71%, 73%) of its accounts receivable were due from the Government of Canada. Over the
last five years, with the exception of the loss recognized with regards to Nortel, the Company has not suffered any signifi-
cant credit related losses.
The Company limits its exposure to credit risks from counter-parties to derivative financial instruments by dealing only with
major Canadian financial institutions. Management does not expect any counter-parties to fail to meet their obligations.
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The maximum exposure to credit risk at
the reporting date was:
Cash
Trade receivable
Derivative assets
Investment
September 30, 2012
September 30, 2011
October 1, 2010
$
31,998
40,928
234
-
$
30,742
35,181
451
-
$
29,055
33,954
158
3,417
$
73,160
$
66,374
$ 66,584
The aging of trade receivable at the reporting date was:
Current
Past due (61-120 days)
Past due (> 120 days)
September 30, 2012
September 30, 2011
October 1, 2010
$
39,971
$
34,246
$
33,072
829
128
833
102
701
181
$
40,928
$
35,181
$
33,954
Based on historic default rates, the Company believes that there are minimal requirements for an allowance for doubtful
accounts.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company’s
approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet liabili-
ties when due. At September 30, 2012 the Company has a cash balance of $31,998 and has an unsecured credit facility, subject
to annual renewal. The credit facility permits the Company to borrow funds up to an aggregate of $25,000. As at September
30, 2012 an amount of $612 was drawn to issue a letter of credit to meet customer contractual requirements. All of the
Company’s financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days.
Fair Value
The fair value of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates their carrying values due to their
short-term maturity.
Fair value of the forward exchange contracts reflects the cash flows due to or from the Company if settlement had taken
place on September 30, 2012.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
51
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
20. Financial instruments and risk management (continued)
The following table provides an analysis of financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair
value, grouped into Levels 1 to 3 of the fair value hierarchy based on the degree to which the fair value is observable:
• Level 1 fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities;
• Level 2 fair value measurements are those derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that
are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and
• Level 3 fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or lia-
bility that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
Cash
Derivative financial assets
Derivative financial liabilities
Total
Cash
Derivative financial assets
Derivative financial liabilities
Total
Cash
Derivative financial assets
Derivative financial liabilities
Total
2012
Level 1
$
31,998
$
-
-
2012
Level 2
-
234
(26)
$
31,998
$
(208)
2011
Level 1
$
30,742
$
-
-
2011
Level 2
-
451
(1,054)
$
30,742
$
(603)
October 1, 2010
October 1, 2010
Level 1
$
29,055
-
-
$
29,055
Level 2
-
158
(48)
110
$
$
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and October 1, 2010.
52 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
21. Acquisition
On March 1, 2012, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Primacy Management Inc. (Primacy) for consider-
ation of $5,244 of which $4,000 was paid on the date of closing, $300 was paid in April 2012 and $944 is payable contingently
as described below. Primacy's principal business activity relates to the management of medical clinics. Primacy was acquired
so as to expand the Company's health service offerings. The acquisition is a business combination to which IFRS 3 Business
Combination applies.
Consideration:
Cash
Contingent consideration (i)
Total
$ 4,300
944
$ 5,244
(i) Under the contingent consideration arrangement, the Company is required to pay the former shareholders of Primacy an
additional $400 and $600 if Primacy attains specified levels of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortiza-
tion (EBITDA) for the years ending February 28, 2013 and 2014 respectively. Currently, Primacy is on target for achieving
its first year earn-out target and with the growing number of clinics operated by Primacy, management believes that
Primacy can achieve its earn-out target in the second period. Therefore, the amount of $944 represents the estimated fair
value of the Company's obligation at the acquisition date.
Acquisition-related costs amounting to $120 have been excluded from the consideration and have been recognized as an
expense in the current year, within the general and administration line item in the consolidated statement of net earnings.
The following are the assets acquired and liabilities recognized at the date of the acquisition:
Current assets:
Cash
Accounts receivable
Prepaid expenses
Non-current assets:
Equipment
Intangibles recognized at time of acquisition
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Deferred tax liability recognized at time of acquisition
Net assets acquired
Goodwill arising on acquisition:
Total consideration
Less: fair value of identifiable net assets acquired
Goodwill acquired on acquisition
$
$
$
188
410
7
605
25
4,670
$ 4,695
$
(105)
(1,214)
$ (1,319)
$ 3,981
$ 5,244
(3,981)
$ 1,263
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
53
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
21. Acquisition (continued)
Substantially all of the goodwill that arose on the acquisition of Primacy relates to the value of the taxable temporary differ-
ences attributable to the acquired intangibles. None of the goodwill arising on the acquisition is expected to be deductible
for tax purposes.
Net cash outflow as at September 30, 2012 related to the acquisition of Primacy:
Consideration paid in cash
Less: cash balances acquired
$ 4,300
(188)
$
$ 4,112
Impact of the acquisition on the consolidated results of the Company:
Included in revenues and net earnings for the year ended September 30, 2012 is $2,461 and $379 respectively, attributable
to the additional business generated by Primacy.
Had this business combination been effected at October 1, 2011, the revenue and net earnings of the Company for the year
ended September 30, 2012 would have been higher by $1,367 and $168 respectively. Management considers these 'pro-
forma' numbers to represent an approximate measure of the performance of the combined group for the year ending
September 30, 2012 and provide a reference point for comparison in future periods.
22. Sale of US subsidiary
On August 31, 2012, the Company sold its US division. The restrictive nature of foreign ownership of US entities that perform
services for the US military, impacted management’s pursuit of growth for this division. Revenues from this division from
October 1, 2011 to the date of sale were $2,841. The sale of the division is not expected to have any material impact on the
results of the Company.
23. Pension Plan
The Company sponsors a defined contribution pension plan for certain of its employees. Required contributions have been
fully funded to September 30, 2012. For the year 2012 (2011), an amount of $712 ($687) was expensed related to this
pension plan.
24. Related Party Transactions
Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties of the Company, have been eliminated on
consolidation and are not disclosed in this note. Other than transactions related to the compensation of key management
personnel as described below, there have been no other transactions between the Company and other related parties.
Compensation of key management personnel:
The compensation for directors and other members of key management during the year was as follows. The compensation
of directors and key executives is determined by the compensation committee having regards to the performance of indi-
viduals and market trends. The key executives are the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Vice-President,
Business and Technology Services Division and the Vice-President, Systems Engineering Division.
Short-term benefits
Retirement allowance
Share-based payments
September 30, 2012
September 30, 2011
$ 2,390
388
139
$ 2,917
$ 2,335
-
139
$ 2,474
54 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
25. Transition to IFRS
The Company adopted IFRS on October 1, 2011 effective for its consolidated financial statements beginning October 1, 2010.
For all periods up to and including September 30, 2011, the Company prepared its financial statements in accordance with
Canadian GAAP. This note explains how the transition from Canadian GAAP to IFRS affected the Company's reported finan-
cial position as at October 1, 2010 and September 30, 2011, as well as comprehensive income and cash flows for the year
ended September 30, 2011. References to Canadian GAAP in this note refer to Part V of the Canadian Institute of Chartered
Accountants Handbook applicable to the Company for the reporting periods up to and including the year ended September
30, 2011.
Initial election upon adoption
IFRS 1 requires a first-time adopter to retrospectively apply all IFRS effective as at the end of its first annual reporting period
(September 30, 2012 for the Company) against opening retained earnings as of the date of the first comparative statements
of financial position presented (i.e. October 1, 2010).
IFRS 1 provides entities adopting IFRS for the first time with a number of optional exemptions and mandatory exceptions,
in certain areas, to the general requirement for full retrospective application of IFRS. The IFRS 1 exemptions that the
Company applied upon adoption are summarized below.
IFRS 1 Exemptions:
Business Combinations
The Company elected to apply IFRS prospectively for business combinations from the date of transition to IFRS. Accordingly,
the Company has not restated the accounting for acquisitions that occurred prior to October 1, 2010.
Foreign currency translation adjustment
At the transition date, the Company transferred all cumulative foreign exchange losses amounting to $357, previously accu-
mulated in the cumulative translation adjustment account to retained earnings. There was no impact on net equity as at
October 1, 2010 as a result of this election.
Share-based payments
The Company elected not to apply IFRS 2 – Share-based payments, to equity instruments granted and vested before
October 1, 2010. At the transition date, there was no adjustment related to equity instruments granted, outstanding and
unvested as a result of this election.
Equipment and application software
The Company chose not to apply the elective exemption to report items of equipment and application software in its
opening statement of financial position on the transition date using fair value as the deemed cost instead of actual cost that
would otherwise be determined under IFRS.
IFRS 1 Mandatory exceptions:
IFRS 1 prohibits retrospective application of some aspects of other IFRS. As a result, the following mandatory exceptions from
full retrospective application of IFRS were applied on transition to IFRS.
• The Company's estimates in accordance with IFRS at the date of transition to IFRS are consistent with estimates made
for the same date in accordance with Canadian GAAP except where necessary to reflect any difference in accounting
policies.
• The Company did not reflect in its opening IFRS statement of financial position a hedging relationship of a type that
did not qualify for hedge accounting in accordance with IAS 39 – Hedge Accounting. All derivatives entered into by the
Company prior to the transition date satisfied the hedge accounting criteria and therefore continue to be reflected as
hedges on transition.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
55
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
25. Transition to IFRS (continued)
Reconciliation of Canadian GAAP to IFRS
IFRS 1 requires an entity to reconcile equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for prior periods. The Company's first
time adoption of IFRS did not have an impact on comprehensive income or total operating, investing or financing cash flows
and therefore no reconciliation is presented. The following represents the reconciliations from Canadian GAAP to IFRS for
the respective periods noted for equity:
Reconciliation of Equity
September 30, 2011
October 1, 2010
Shareholders’ Equity as reported under Canadian GAAP
$ 62,918
$ 58,783
Share repurchase agreement transferred to liabilities
(a)
(562)
(1,315)
Shareholders’ Equity as reported under IFRS
$ 62,356
$ 57,468
(a) Reclassification within the Statement of Financial Position:
The Company has an agreement with a third party which provides for automatic repurchases of the Company’s shares
without the Company having the ability to influence the purchases. The financial liability is determined as the present value
of the maximum redemption amount. At October 1, 2010 and September 30, 2011, a reclassification adjustment was made
and issued capital and retained earnings were reduced by $178 ($73) and $1,137 ($489) respectively with an offsetting
adjustment to the share repurchase liability account. The amount of the reclassification for future periods will change based
on the value of the commitment at the measurement date. An income adjustment will result on any share repurchased below
the maximum amount per share.
(b) Reclassification within the Statement of Earnings:
The Company has also made the mandatory reclassification and amortization expense is no longer presented separately but
rather is classified based on the underlying functions between Cost of revenues, Selling and marketing and General and
administration.
For the year ended September 30, 2011, the depreciation amount of $1,128 was reclassified as follows:
Cost of revenues
$
Selling and marketing
General and administration
546
131
451
Total
$
1,128
56 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
25. Transition to IFRS (continued)
Adjustments to Consolidated Statement of Financial Position – as at October 1, 2010
Canadian GAAP Accounts
footnotes
Canadian
GAAP
IFRS
Adjustments
IFRS
reclassifications
IFRS
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash
Accounts receivable
Work in process
Prepaid expenses
Future income taxes
Derivative assets
Investment
Total current assets
Deferred tax assets
Investment
Equipment
Application software
Goodwill
Total non-current assets
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payables and accrued liabilities
Unearned contract revenue
Share repurchase obligation
Derivative liabilities
Total current liabilities
Long-term liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Issued capital
Contributed surplus
Retained earnings
(a)
(a)
(b)
(b)
(b) (c)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
(c)
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
$
29,055
33,954
3,576
6,329
696
158
953
74,721
-
2,464
4,611
543
9,518
17,136
$
91,857
$
17,024
16,002
-
48
33,074
-
33,074
18,689
171
39,769
154
58,783
$
91,857
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,315
-
1,315
-
1,315
(178)
-
(1,494)
357
(1,315)
-
-
-
-
-
(696)
-
-
(696)
696
-
-
-
-
$ 29,055
33,954
3,576
6,329
-
158
953
74,025
696
2,464
4,611
543
9,518
696
17,832
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 91,857
$ 17,024
16,002
1,315
48
34,389
-
34,389
18,511
171
38,275
511
57,468
$ 91,857
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
57
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
25. Transition to IFRS (continued)
Adjustments to Consolidated Statement of Financial Position – as at September 30, 2011
Canadian GAAP Accounts
footnotes
Canadian
GAAP
IFRS
Adjustments
IFRS
reclassifications
IFRS
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash
Accounts receivable
Work in process
Prepaid expenses
Future income taxes
Derivative assets
Total current assets
Deferred tax assets
Equipment
Application software
Goodwill
Total non-current assets
TOTAL ASSETS
(a)
(a)
$
30,742
35,181
6,960
2,751
480
451
76,565
-
4,069
440
9,518
14,027
$
90,592
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payables and accrued liabilities
$
18,594
Unearned contract revenue
Share repurchase obligation
Derivative liabilities
Total current liabilities
Long-term liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Issued capital
Contributed surplus
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(b)
(b)
(b) (c)
(c)
8,026
-
1,054
27,674
-
27,674
19,091
219
44,191
(583)
62,918
$
90,592
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
562
-
562
-
562
(73)
-
(846)
357
(562)
-
-
-
-
-
(480)
-
(480)
480
-
-
-
480
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 30,742
35,181
6,960
2,751
-
451
76,085
480
4,069
440
9,518
14,507
$ 90,592
$ 18,594
8,026
562
1,054
28,236
-
28,236
19,018
219
43,345
(226)
62,356
$ 90,592
58 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Canadian dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
25. Transition to IFRS (continued)
(a) Under Canadian GAAP, deferred taxes are split between current and non-current components on the basis of either the
underlying asset or liability or the expected reversal of items not related to an asset or liability. Under IFRS, all deferred
tax assets and liabilities are classified as non-current.
(b) IFRS stipulates that an obligation is created when an agreement is entered into with a third party which provides for auto-
matic repurchases of the Company’s shares without the Company having the ability to influence the purchases. The
financial liability is determined as the present value of the maximum redemption amount. At October 1, 2010 (September
30, 2011), a reclassification adjustment was made and issued capital and retained earnings were reduced by $178 ($73)
and $1,137 ($489) respectively with an offsetting adjustment to the share repurchase liability account. The amount of the
reclassification for future periods will change based on the value of the commitment at the measurement date. An income
adjustment will result on any share repurchased below the maximum amount per share. Based on historical trends, the
amount of income to recognize is not expected to be significant.
(c) At the transition date, as permitted under IFRS 1, the Company transferred all cumulative foreign exchange losses amount-
ing to $357, previously accumulated in the cumulative translation adjustment account to retained earnings. There was no
impact on net equity as at October 1, 2010 as a result of this election.
Calian Technologies Ltd.
2012 Annual Report
59
Common Share Information
The Company’s common shares are listed for trading
on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol CTY.
Dividend Policy
The Company intends to continue to declare a quar-
terly dividend in line with its overall financial
performance and cash flow generation. Decisions on
dividend payments are made on a quarterly basis by
the Board of Directors. There can be no assurance as
to the amount of such dividends in the future.
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
The Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders of
Calian will be held on February 8, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. at
the Brookstreet Hotel, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. All
shareholders are invited to attend. The telephone
number of the Brookstreet Hotel is 613.271.1800.
Corporate Information
Corporate & Business
and Technology Services
340 Legget Drive, Suite 101,
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K2K 1Y6
Phone: 613.599.8600
Fax: 613.599.8650
Web: www.calian.com
Systems Engineering (SED)
P.O. Box 1464
18 Innovation Blvd.
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7K 3P7
Phone: 306.931.3425
Fax: 306.933.1486
Web: www.sedsystems.ca
Primacy Management Inc.
2321 Fairview Street, Suite 100
Burlington, Ontario
L7R 2E3
Phone: 905.637.2888
Board of Directors
Kenneth J. Loeb
Chief E xecutive Officer, Loeb Packaging Ltd.
Chairman, Calian Technologies Ltd.
Chair of the Nominating Committee
Major General (retired) C. William Hewson
Consultant
Chair of the Governance Committee
David Tkachuk
Senator
Chair of the Compensation Committee
Richard Vickers, FCA
Consultant
Chair of the Audit Committee
Ray Basler
President and CEO, Calian Technologies Ltd.
George Weber
President and CEO,
Royal Ottawa Health Care Group
60 2012 Annual Report
Calian Technologies Ltd.
Notes