Quarterlytics / Utilities / Regulated Gas / Chesapeake Utilities

Chesapeake Utilities

cpk · NYSE Utilities
Claim this profile
Ticker cpk
Exchange NYSE
Sector Utilities
Industry Regulated Gas
Employees 501-1000
← All annual reports
FY2018 Annual Report · Chesapeake Utilities
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2 0 1 8   A N N U A L   R E P O R T

A STRONG 

foundation 

FOR GROWTH

foundation noun

foun•da•tion

Chesapeake Utilities’ solid track record, driven by our strong 

aspiration for growth and commitment to care for our 

employees, customers, investors and the communities we serve.

5,359 MILES

of gas pipeline and distribution mains 

2

Chesapeake Utilities Corporatation | 2018 Annual Report

Natural gas is an abundant, reliable and clean energy 
source made possible by energy infrastructure. Natural 
gas pipelines enable homes and businesses to access 
natural gas for heating, cooking and lighting as well as 
fueling vehicles. Pictured at our Chesapeake Utilities’ 
operation in Dover, DE, is Glenn Wilson, Distribution 
System Technician.

contents

04

06

08

Our Company

Business Operations

A Letter From Our President

1 2 2018 Financial Highlights

14

1 6

24

26

30

33

34

Corporate Governance

Employee-Centric Company

Response, Relief & Restoration:  
Hurricane Michael

Connecting With Our Customers & 
Communities

Our Commitment To Sustainability

Marlin Gas Services

Leadership and Board of Directors

our company

of our Company. Our people 
drive our strategic plan, building 
upon the strong foundation 
that positions us for growth 
opportunities year after year. 

We are a responsible Company 
that fosters a workplace where 
employees feel empowered to 
achieve their goals, know that 
they are cared for and take pride 
in what they do. Our employees 
work together across our 
businesses to identify innovative 
ways to serve our customers, 
grow our businesses and support 
our communities.

As we continue to expand our 
geographic footprint and enter 
into new markets, we remain 
grounded and steadfastly 
focused on long-term value for 
our stakeholders and generating 
results that lead the industry.

Chesapeake Utilities 

Corporation (Chesapeake 

Utilities) is a NYSE-traded 

company (CPK) focused 

on delivering outstanding 

service and attaining 

sustainable growth that 

generates long-term 

value for our employees, 

customers, investors and 

communities. 

Headquartered in Dover, DE, 
our Company has been serving 
customers since 1859. Through 
our operating divisions and 
subsidiaries, Chesapeake Utilities 
provides natural gas distribution 
and transmission; electricity 
generation and distribution; 
propane gas distribution; and 
other energy related activities.

Chesapeake Utilities’ past 
performance and positive results 
for 2018 reflect upon the hard 
work and dedication of our 
employees who are the heart 

4

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

John Keen, Railcar Unloader, unloads 
propane gas from a rail car delivery at 
Sharp Energy’s North Dover Rail Plant. 
Sharp Energy owns four rail facilities with 
propane storage capacity.

O U R   C O M P A N Y

We have proven ourselves to be a truly caring and 

always aspiring Company. The key to our success is our 

employees’ creative talent, relentless pursuit of better 

solutions and unwavering commitment to serving our 

customers. From the personal connections that we make 

with our customers, communities and each other, to the 

safe and reliable service provided to our customers, our 

employees are our strong foundation for growth.

Jeff Householder, President and  
Chief Executive Officer 

12

years of superior 
earnings growth

980+

employees

$1.7B

total assets  
at 12/31/18

246,000+

distribution 
customers

$283M

2018 capital 
investments

5

‘‘”Chesapeake Utilities

Serves approximately 68,000 customers. Owns 
and operates approximately 1,400 miles of gas 
distribution mains. Chesapeake Utilities distributes 
natural gas through its Delaware and Maryland 
divisions to residential, commercial and industrial 
customers.

68,000 1,400

customers

miles of gas 
distribution mains

Aspire Energy, Inc.

Owns and operates natural gas 
infrastructure including over 
2,700 miles of pipeline systems 
in 40 counties throughout Ohio. 
Aspire Energy provides natural gas 
supplies to several local distribution 
companies and cooperatives. Aspire 
Energy primarily sources gas from 
approximately 300 conventional 
producers and provides additional 
services to maintain quality and 
reliability to wholesale markets.

2,700

miles of pipeline

40

counties served 
throughout 
Ohio

300

sourced 
conventional 
producers

6

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

486

miles of pipeline

50

BCF of natural 
gas transported  
a year

Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (ESNG)

Owns and operates a  
486-mile interstate pipeline that 
transports natural gas from four 
pipeline interconnection points 
in Pennsylvania to customers 
in Delaware, Maryland and 
Pennsylvania. ESNG transports 
over 50 billion cubic feet (BCF) 
of natural gas annually to local 
distribution companies, electric 
power generators and industrial 
customers throughout the region.

business operations

B U S I N E S S   O P E R A T I O N S

Eight Flags Energy, LLC

Provides electricity and steam generation services through a 
combined heat and power (CHP) plant on Amelia Island, FL, 
serving approximately 50% of Amelia Island’s demand for 
electricity.

7

states within its 
market area

16

local 
distribution 
companies 
served

Peninsula Energy Services 
Company, Inc. (PESCO)

Provides natural gas supply, asset 
management and risk management 
services to retail and wholesale 
customers in the Mid-Atlantic, 
Southeast and Appalachian Basin 
regions. PESCO transacts on more 
than 10 transmission pipelines and 
over 16 local distribution companies 
in seven states.

21

megawatts of 
baseload power

78%

efficiency

129,000

customers

21

counties served 
throughout 
Florida

2,900

miles of  
gas distribution 
mains

Florida Public Utilities 

Company (FPU)

Owns and operates 
approximately 2,900 
miles of natural gas 
distribution mains across 
21 counties in Florida and 
distributes natural gas to 
approximately 80,000 
customers; electricity to 
32,000 customers; and 
propane to 17,000 customers 
throughout Florida (includes 
the Company’s Florida 
natural gas division).

Marlin Gas Services, LLC (Marlin)

Maintains one of the largest fleets of tube trailers 
dedicated to transporting compressed natural gas 
(CNG). Marlin provides CNG services nationwide and 
offers interim solutions where pipeline supplies are not 
available or cannot meet customer requirements. With 
its primary focus on the Gulf Coast region from Texas 
to Florida, Marlin has transported more than 7 billion 
cubic feet of natural gas.

7

BCF of natural gas transported

Peninsula Pipeline Company, Inc. (PPC)

Owns and operates several intrastate natural gas pipelines 
in Florida providing transportation service that links 
interstate pipelines to local distribution systems, industrial 
customers and power generation facilities.

106

7

miles of pipeline

counties served throughout Florida

Sandpiper Energy, Inc.

Serves approximately  
11,000 residential, 
commercial and industrial 
customers in Worcester 
County, MD.

Originally comprised 
of propane distribution 
systems, Sandpiper Energy 
is actively converting its 
customers to natural gas. 
Sandpiper currently owns 
and operates over 300 miles 
of natural gas distribution 
mains.

11,000

300

customers

miles of gas  
distribution 
mains

Sharp Energy, Inc.

Distributes propane to 
42,000 customers in 
Delaware, Maryland, 
Virginia and southeastern 
Pennsylvania. Sharp 
AutoGas fuels over 1,200 
vehicles and is available 
at 48 propane fueling 
stations in Delaware, 
Maryland, Virginia, 
Pennsylvania and Florida.

10

retail 
locations

42,000

customers

1,200 vehicles fueled 

via AutoGas

7

A LETTER FROM OUR

president

We continued to execute our long-term, disciplined growth strategy. Our annual capital 

investment of approximately $283 million and annual gross margin growth of $36.6 

million were both record results. We had solid year-over-year growth in our natural 

gas and propane gas distribution operations. Our gas transmission businesses on the 

Delmarva Peninsula and in Florida completed two of the largest pipeline expansion 

projects in the Company’s history. Chesapeake Utilities’ 2018 adjusted earnings per share 

(EPS) increased 14.5%. We have consistently delivered long-term annual shareholder 

returns of 15%, and more recently as high as 25%, while at the same time being true to our 

unwavering commitment to the safe operation of our systems. 

This is my first letter to you as President and CEO 
of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation. I am pleased 
to report that 2018 was another record-setting year. 
Over the past decade, Chesapeake Utilities’ growth 
and financial results have made us a top quartile 
performer among comparable energy companies 
in the U.S. One of the principal reasons for that 
success is our employees. We remain focused on 
attracting, developing and retaining the talent and 
experience required to maintain our culture and 
manage an ever-expanding and geographically 
diverse portfolio of assets. 

LEADERSHIP TRANSITION

Our Board of Directors has long held the view that 
succession planning is a critical component to 
sustaining and increasing shareholder value. One of 
the basic tenets of our strategy is to ensure we have 
the bench strength to promote internal candidates 
to fill key positions.

Last year, Mike McMasters, our CEO for the past 
eight years, retired. As many of you know, Mike was 
a 38-year Chesapeake Utilities employee. We are 
fortunate to have a number of employees whose 
careers, like Mike’s, span the time when Chesapeake 
Utilities transformed itself from a small Delmarva 

distribution and interstate transmission pipeline to a 
multistate energy delivery company. Mike took over 
from John Schimkaitis not long after the acquisition 
of Florida Public Utilities Company. He led the 
Company over an unprecedented period of growth, 
where we added over $1 billion in gross plant. I was 
fortunate to work with Mike and the Chesapeake 
Utilities’ team to drive that growth as President of 
the Company’s Florida operations since 2010. 

When Mike announced his retirement, our Board, 
with the assistance of a leading search firm, 
implemented the next steps of its executive 
succession plan. It’s a testament to the strength 
and capabilities of our team that there were several 
well-qualified internal candidates to consider. I’m 
honored and humbled to have been chosen to 
lead this dynamic organization through our next 
period of growth. The Board’s decision to appoint 
an internal successor is a strong endorsement of 
our successful strategic growth plan, which has 
consistently produced superior shareholder returns. 
I certainly appreciate the opportunity of assuming 
the leadership of a company in such great financial 
shape. All of us at Chesapeake Utilities look forward 
to writing the next chapter in our Company’s 
growth story.

8

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

A CULTURE OF SAFETY AND COMPLIANCE

Over the past several years, we have received many 
accolades for our financial performance. However, 
the awards I am most proud of recognize our efforts 
to improve service reliability and sustain employee, 
customer and community safety. Chesapeake Utilities’ 
operating units frequently receive national safety 
commendations. Most recently, in 2018, our Eastern 
Shore Natural Gas and Aspire Energy units were 
recognized for safety achievements by the American 
Gas Association. 

Fostering a culture of operational safety and 
reliability requires a commitment from the top and 
throughout the organization of both intent and 
resources. Our intentions are clear. Safety is the 
most important facet of our business. Over the past 
five years, we have invested almost $250 million in 
pipeline integrity projects and improving our gas 
and electric transmission and distribution systems. 
As part of these upgrades, we have replaced almost 
300 miles of natural gas pipeline, thousands of gas 
service lines and installed over 2,000 storm hardened 
electric poles. We’ve added personnel in key safety 
and compliance positions across the Company. New 
technologies have been deployed to better monitor 
our facilities and track maintenance requirements. This 
year, we will break ground on a new state-of-the-art 
safety training facility in Dover, DE. 

ENGAGED WORKFORCE

Someone recently said to me that Chesapeake 
Utilities’ combination of strategic focus, engaged 
employees and innovative approach to the market 
was the “secret sauce” responsible for our success. I 
think that’s a good way to describe our Company. It 
is rare in my experience to find a group of employees 
as committed to customer and community service as 
those I work alongside at Chesapeake Utilities. Time 
after time, I have watched our people work to put 
customer interests first. Our employees actively look 
for creative solutions. They are not hesitant to try an 
innovative approach. Whether it’s providing propane 
AutoGas to customer fleets, building a combined heat 
and power plant that delivers low cost steam to a 
paper mill or a new tariff service to a power generator, 
our employees consistently find a way to deliver for 
our customers. Our employees’ concern for customers 
translates into a broader interest in the communities 
we serve. Later in this report you will see only a 
sampling of our extensive engagement in charitable 
and community service activities.

A   L E T T E R   F R O M   O U R   P R E S I D E N T

‘‘

Someone recently said to me that 
Chesapeake Utilities’ combination 
of strategic focus, engaged 
employees and innovative approach 
to the market was the ‘secret sauce’ 
responsible for our success. I think 
that’s a good way to describe our 
Company.

”

Jeff Householder,  
President and Chief Executive Officer

9

 
 
PRIORITIES FOR 2019 

Our business strategy for 2019 is consistent with 
the successful strategy we have executed for the 
past several years. There are many opportunities 
to expand and grow within our existing, core 
distribution and transmission businesses. Our 
regulated units will continue to develop and pursue 
innovative regulatory solutions for investment cost 
recovery. We will selectively, and with our customary 
discipline, seek to develop projects and acquire 
businesses that complement our existing portfolio, 
provide rapid earnings accretion and generate 
target returns. As always, we will continue to invest 
in safe, reliable and efficient operations. Several of 
our operational objectives for 2019 are listed below:

•  Complete the Hurricane Michael cost recovery filing 

with the Florida Public Service Commission.

•  Complete the final phase of the ESNG 2017 System 

Expansion Project and work to secure Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (FERC) approval for the  
Del-Mar Energy Pathway Project.

•  Fully integrate the Marlin Gas Services acquisition; 

expand marketing efforts across the South and Mid-
Atlantic.

•  Deploy state infrastructure grants awarded to 
Chesapeake Utilities to expand our natural gas 
distribution systems further into Cecil and Somerset 
Counties in Maryland and Sussex County in Delaware.

•  Continue to grow Peninsula Pipeline Company’s 

intrastate transmission pipeline business in Florida; 
complete three expansion projects in western Palm 
Beach County. 

•  Expand our propane AutoGas business with particular 

focus on Maryland, Virginia and Florida.

• 

Invest $15 million in gas pipeline replacement and 
system modernization.

•  Continue developing and investing in our high-

performing team to support our culture and ongoing 
succession planning throughout the Company.

In addition to the above operational objectives, 
we have established several financial objectives in 
support of increasing shareholder value:

• 

In 2018, for the first time, provided guidance on our 
five-year capital spending plan with a total investment 
range of $600 million to $1 billion through 2022; then, 
based in part on our strong investment performance 
in 2018, updated the range to $750 million to $1 
billion. 

•  Deploy $168 million capital budget.

•  Generate an EPS compound growth rate in the range 

of 7.75% - 9.5% through 2022.

•  Target an 11.0% consolidated Return on Equity or 

higher.

•  Sustain dividend growth supported by earnings 

growth while generating a Dividend Payout Ratio of 
approximately 45%.

•  Migrate our capital structure back in line with our 

target equity to total capitalization ratio of 50% to 
60%.

We had a great year in 2018. Over the past several years, we have established a strong foundation that will 
support future growth. Chesapeake Utilities is well positioned to continue to build on that foundation and 
deliver exceptional service to our customers and industry leading results for our shareholders. 

Sincerely,

Jeffry M. Householder 
President and Chief Executive Officer

10

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

A   L E T T E R   F R O M   O U R   P R E S I D E N T

ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2018 

We executed on several strategic initiatives in 2018.

Eastern Shore Natural Gas (ESNG) 2017 Expansion 
The largest single construction project in Chesapeake Utilities’ history was substantially completed and placed in-service 
in 2018. The $117 million transmission system expansion increased Delmarva delivery capacity by 26% and will help meet 
the growing energy requirements of southern Delaware and the Eastern Shore of Maryland. 

ESNG Reliability Projects 
In response to the winter peak days experienced in 2014 and 2015, ESNG initiated several projects to improve overall 
system operational reliability. During the 2018/2019 winter, ESNG set a new daily delivery record in excess of 250,000 
dekatherms. Our record deliveries validate both our continued growth in system demand as well as the enhanced 
operational reliability. 

ESNG Rate Proceeding 
To recover the cost of the system expansion and reliability projects, we completed a FERC rate proceeding that 
contributed $9.5 million in margin in 2018.

Peninsula Pipeline Company (PPC) Expansion 
PPC, our intrastate transmission business in Florida, constructed a $36 million pipeline to serve industrial customers and 
two gas utilities in Escambia County, FL. PPC also completed a $9 million project to replace an aging, undersized lateral 
serving the FPU New Smyrna Beach distribution system. 

Sharp Energy Acquisition 
Our propane business continued to grow. We completed the acquisition of the R.F. Ohl Company, a retail propane 
business in the Pocono Mountain region in Pennsylvania. Along with the Chipola Gas acquisition in Florida, completed at 
the end of 2017, we added 4,500 propane customers. 

Sharp Energy AutoGas 
The AutoGas business keeps growing. In 2018, we delivered more than 2 million gallons of propane for vehicle fuel. 

Marlin Gas Services Acquisition 
Late in 2018, we acquired Marlin Gas Services, an unregulated compressed natural gas (CNG) transport and delivery 
company. Marlin provides temporary CNG fuel service to support emergency and planned maintenance pipeline outages 
and hold gas distribution systems until permanent pipeline service can be established while also offering a variety of 
specialty services such as transporting renewable landfill gas for pipeline injection. Marlin is a business we know well; we 
have been a customer for years. With the addition of Chesapeake Utilities’ capital and administrative support, we expect 
significant growth from Marlin in 2019.

Delmarva Natural Gas (DNG) Expansion 
Our Delmarva distribution utilities continue to grow, adding over 3,000 customers in 2018. The conversion of the 
underground propane system in and around Ocean City, MD, that Chesapeake Utilities acquired in 2013, is progressing 
on schedule. We have converted over 7,600 accounts to date. Two state grants awarded to DNG will enable us to install 
over 10 miles of new mains to serve new customers in Kent and Sussex Counties, DE. 

Hurricane Michael 
One of our greatest, and at the same time most heartbreaking, accomplishments in 2018 was the response and 
restoration of electric service after Hurricane Michael. We describe in greater detail later in this report the tremendous 
work under very difficult conditions performed by our employees in partnership with local and state officials and many 
third-party electric workers, tree crews and others. They often say the most rewarding experiences come out of periods 
of great difficulty. The unwavering commitment and care of everyone involved in our restoration effort underscores that 
principle.

11

2018 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

2018’s results were a culmination of the tireless efforts of 
almost 1,000 employees to deliver energy and solutions 
to just under 250,000 customers. 

We reported 2018 net income of $56.6 million, or $3.45 
per diluted share, compared to $58.1 million, or $3.55 per 
diluted share for 2017. The 2017 results include a one-time 
tax benefit from the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (TCJA), which 
added $0.87 per diluted share, or $14.3 million in 2017. If 
you compare our adjusted results for 2018 versus 2017, 
2018 registers as another year of record performance, 
with an approximate 15% increase over 2017 adjusted 
earnings per share.

Our operating income was $94.6 million compared 
with $87.4 million in 2017, representing growth of 

approximately 8%. Excluding the pass-through of lower 
taxes to customers (which has a corresponding offset 
in income taxes), operating income actually grew $16.8 
million, or 19% annually. This operating income growth 
was driven by a record gross margin increase of $36.6 
million generated from continued growth across the 
Company’s businesses, key regulatory initiatives and 
colder weather (although still warmer than normal). 

In keeping with our strong performance in 2017, the 
Chesapeake Utilities’ Board of Directors approved in May 
2018, our 15th consecutive annual dividend increase. Our 
$1.48 per share dividend represents an approximate 14% 
annual dividend increase. Chesapeake has paid a dividend 
to its shareholders without interruption for 58 years.

Financial  
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Gross Margin (Before TCJA Impact)1

Gross Margin

Operating Income

Net Income

Adjusted (Non-GAAP) Earnings

Earnings Per Share 
  Basic 

Diluted

Adjusted (Non-GAAP) Earnings Per Share - Diluted1

Annualized Dividends Per Share

Total Assets

Stockholders’ Equity

2018

2017

2018/2017 
% Change

2016

2017/2016 
% Change

$316,310

$279,669

$306,748

$279,669

$94,620

$87,420

$56,580

$58,124

$54,295

$47,324

$3.46 

$3.45

$3.31

$1.48

$3.56 

$3.55

$2.89

$1.30

13%

10%

8%

-3%

15%

-3% 

-3%

15%

14%

$260,817

$260,817

$85,983

7%

7%

2%

$44,675

30%

$44,675

6%

$2.87 

$2.86

$2.86

$1.22

24% 

24%

1%

7%

15%

9%

12%

Return On Average Equity

11.2%

12.6%

$1,693,671

$1,414,934

20%

$1,229,219

$518,439

$486,294

7%

-11%

$446,086

11.3%

Other

Employees

983

945

4%

903

5%

Shares Outstanding at Year End

16,378,545

16,344,442

N/M

16,303,499

N/M

Average Distribution Customers

247,487

240,323

3%

235,821

2%

1 Please see the enclosed Annual Report on Form 10-K for specific definitions of these items.

12

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

 
 
 
 
 
Capital Expenditures 
(in millions)

$938M

$
1
9
5
3

.

$
1
6
9
4

.

$
1
9
1
.
1

$
7
5
0
M

-
$
1
B
*

$
2
8
3
0

.

35%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

$–

$
9
8
.
1

Diluted Earnings Per Share

  8 . 8 %

-

  E P S   C A G R  

.

$
2
8
6

.

$
2
8
9
*

$
2
7
2

.

.

$
3
4
5

.

$
3
3
1
*

r

5 - Y e a

.

$
2
4
7

.

$
2
2
6

$3.50

$3.00

$2.50

$2.00

$1.50

$1.00

$0.50

$0.00

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2018-2022

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018*

2018

Capital Expenditures Excluding Acquisitions

Capital Expenditures/Total Capitalization

Acquisitions

*Looking forward, we expect to make capital investments 
totaling $750M to $1B from 2018 to 2022.

*Adjusted Non-GAAP EPS. 
Growth in 2018 and over the past five years reflects 
successful execution of our disciplined growth strategy.

Average Return on Equity (ROE)

Annualized Dividends Per Share

.

1
2
2
%

1
2
.
1

%

.

1
2
6
%

1
1
.
3
%

1
1
.
2
%

13%

12%

11%

10%

9%

8%

7%

6%

5%

4%

$1.48

$1.30

$1.22

$1.15

$1.08

$2.00

$1.50

$1.40

$1.30

$1.20

$1.10

$1.00

$0.90

$0.80

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

We generated a ROE above 11% in each of 
the past five years.

Chesapeake has paid dividends without interruption for 58 
years. We have increased dividends for the last 15 consecutive 
years. In 2018, we increased the dividend by 13.8%.

Compound Annual Shareholder Return 
(Period Ended 1/31/19)

Market Capitalization 
(In millions)

2
5
%

30%

25%

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%

2
1
%

2
0
%

1
5
%

1
5
%

$
1
,
2
8
3
9

.

$
1
,
3
3
1
.
6

$
1
,
0
9
1
.
5

$
8
6
6
6

.

$
7
2
4
5

.

$
5
7
8
2

.

1 Yr

3 Yr

5 Yr

10 Yr

20 Yr

Our investors have earned 15% annually or greater on their Chesapeake 
Utilities’ investment (based upon periods ended January 31, 2019).

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Our market capitalization has more than doubled 
over the past five years.

13

 
 
corporate 
governance

At Chesapeake Utilities, corporate governance 

is the foundation of our processes and our 

decision-making throughout the Company, 

beginning with our Board of Directors and 

extending to every employee. It reflects who 

we are, what we stand for and what we do.  

Our core values and strong culture unite us 

and stand as part of our foundation upon 

which we operate. 

Our corporate governance framework is a continuation 
of the strong foundation that has been cultivated here 
at Chesapeake Utilities for more than 150 years. 

At our core, it is our culture that promotes integrity, 
accountability and reliability - with the safety of those 
we serve as our highest priority. It is the possibilities 
afforded to us from the commitment and engagement 
of our employees who dedicate many hours to develop 
initiatives, enhance the customer experience, assist 
each other and make a difference in our communities. 
With oversight and accountability from our Board 
of Directors, along with the collective efforts of our 
employees and the support of our investors, we are 
able to make investments in projects that provide safe, 
reliable, plentiful and environmentally friendly energy 
options to existing and new customers. We are proud 
to stand together, united with our stakeholders, and to 
be an essential part of delivering energy solutions. 

2018 was a celebratory year for Chesapeake Utilities. 
We were honored to receive the award for Best 
Corporate Governance Among North American Utilities 
by Ethical Boardroom Magazine. This prestigious 
award recognizes outstanding leadership worldwide 
for companies that have raised the bar to ensure 
that strong corporate governance contributes daily 
to enhancing long-term value for all stakeholders. 
We were also honored to be placed in the top three 
companies for Corporate Governance Team of the 
Year (small to mid-cap sized companies) by Corporate 
Secretary Magazine, an award we received in 2017. This 
award recognizes the best in corporate governance for 
their commitment to a culture that promotes integrity 
and accountability.

Today is a time when many of our employees, 
communities and investors contribute to the evolving 
corporate governance landscape. It is a time where 
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) oversight 
initiatives of many energy industry investors and 
other stakeholders are helping to inform operational 
decision-making and investment strategies. We 
embrace these initiatives, our long-standing culture 
and practices that align with these initiatives and the 
opportunity to communicate to all of our stakeholders 
the positive impact the energy industry has on the 
country’s economy, as well as on the security of 
investors, customers, regulators and the communities 
we serve.

Our commitment to a culture that promotes integrity and 

accountability, along with the hard work and dedication 

of our team, is the foundation for our continued success.

Jim Moriarty, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate 
Secretary and Chief Policy and Risk Officer 

‘‘

14

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

”

C O R P O R A T E   G O V E R N A N C E

Pictured, left to right, are Shane Breakie, Assistant Vice President, Chesapeake Utilities; Jim Moriarty, Executive Vice President, 
General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Policy and Risk Officer; Stacie Roberts, Director of Corporate Governance; Jeff 
Householder, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Lou Anatrella, Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, at the 
Corporate Secretary Magazine Corporate Governance Awards ceremony in New York City. Photo Courtesy of Corporate Secretary 
Magazine.

2018 Best North 
American Utility  
for Corporate 
Governance 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation was the recipient of Ethical 
Boardroom Magazine’s 2018 award for Best Corporate 
Governance in the Utilities Sector in North America. The 
prestigious award recognizes outstanding leadership 
worldwide for companies that have raised the bar to ensure 
that strong corporate governance contributes daily to 
enhancing long-term value for all stakeholders.

What We Do At Chesapeake Utilities

•  We are committed to a culture that promotes integrity, 

accountability and reliability - with the safety of those we 
serve as our highest priority 

•  We invest in our infrastructure to provide clean natural gas to 
customers and are an integral part of the energy solution

•  We invest in diverse value-added projects, including 

•  Diversity, inclusion and equality are embedded in our culture 
and employees are empowered and encouraged to be 
authentic leaders and contribute in meaningful ways

converting customers to natural gas, opening a CNG fueling 
station, promoting the use of combined heat and power and 
participating in electric vehicle charging programs

• 

Each employee has a duty to maintain a work environment 
that is free from all discrimination and harassment and 
provides a positive experience that respects human rights

•  As an energy company, we report on environmental, safety 
and emissions standards set by our federal and state 
regulators 

•  Chesapeake Utilities was recognized as a Top Workplace for 

the seventh consecutive year based on feedback from our 
employees

•  We sponsor health and wellness programs for our employees 
and their families and encourage employees to be well, in 
every sense

•  We have a nationally recognized facility that received an 

independent certification for the use of sustainable materials 
and leading edge environmental elements, resulting in reduced 
energy consumption 

•  We are members of organizations that promote energy 

efficiency, such as the Energy Efficiency Advisory Council and 
the Clean Cities Coalition

•  We make available to our stakeholders energy efficiency 
information through our websites and customer mailings

•  We have a facility that is one of the most energy-efficient 

cogeneration power plants in the U.S.

•  We conserve approximately 2 million gallons of water annually 
from a rainwater reclamation method at one of our facilities

•  We are proud to offer customers an energy conservation 

rebate program, and to provide conservation education to the 
community

•  We have a SHARING program that provides energy-related 

funds to qualified families with financial needs

15

EMPLOYEE-CENTRIC

company

Chesapeake Utilities is focused on sustaining our aspiring and 

caring culture that nurtures our shared values and encapsulates 

the essence of our Company.

Our talented workforce comprised of experienced professionals with diverse 
backgrounds working collaboratively across the Company is a pillar of our 
foundation for growth. Our employees are committed to meeting the highest 
standards for our colleagues, customers and communities. By building 
meaningful connections, gaining new perspectives and identifying opportunities 
beyond our existing offerings and service areas, our employees drive progress 
and innovation.

At Chesapeake Utilities, we cultivate a high-performance workforce, promoting 
integrity and accountability. Our continued growth depends upon investing in 
our employees, empowering them to leverage their expertise and celebrating 
Company successes and employees’ achievements. 

7 YEARS

in a row being 
recognized as a Top 
Workplace Company

At Chesapeake Utilities, our people are the very heart of our culture. From 

their relentless determination and drive to find innovative solutions, to the 

personal connections they make every day, they continually go above and 

beyond to turn our aspirations into reality.

Lou Anatrella, Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer

‘‘

”

The FPU team in 
Fernandina Beach, FL, 
is committed to caring 
for our customers, 
communities and 
colleagues.

16

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

COMPANY ACCOLADES

E M P L O Y E E - C E N T R I C   C O M P A N Y
E M P L O Y E E - C E N T R I C   C O M P A N Y

‘‘

As Chief Financial Officer, one measure of the Company’s success has 

certainly been its financial performance as measured by any number of 

metrics. What has been equally exciting as the financial performance, 

though, are the many accolades we have received across the Company. 

Whether it is answering a customer’s question, working with our external 

partners or engaging in community service, our employees take pride in 

everything they do. There is an underlying drive to demonstrate excellence 

in everything that is undertaken. This comes through loud and clear. It is 

very rewarding to see the Company and its many ambassadors recognized 

for the positive impact being made each and every day.

Beth Cooper, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 

”

PR News Award — PR Rising Star Under 30

The PR News “PR Rising Star Under 30” is bestowed upon the industry’s best and brightest. In 2018, 

Crystal Campbell, Supervisor, Integrated Communications, was named a “PR Rising Star Under 30” 

at the annual awards luncheon in Washington, D.C. Ms. Campbell was recognized for her leadership, 

growth, campaign innovation, relationship building and mentorship qualities, as well as her ability to 

grow audiences and increase awareness and engagement.

2018 Best Practices Awards in Outage Communications

FPU was honored with the Bronze Award for mid-sized utilities by Chartwell at the “2018 Best 

Practices Awards in Outage Communications.” FPU’s Hurricane Irma Community Engagement 

Campaign was recognized for tackling the communications challenges of this event, which included 

handling an unusually large volume of operations inquiries and customer interactions. The Company’s 

dedicated customer care, operations and communications team members successfully managed and 

executed a social media strategy that helped to keep FPU customers safe, informed and in contact 

with FPU representatives, providing reassurance and relief during times of uncertainty.

2018 Social Media Awards

PR News presented FPU with two honorable mentions at the 2018 PR News’ Social Media Awards 

Luncheon. FPU was a finalist in the categories, “Facebook-Best PR Campaign” and “Facebook-

Community/Engagement” for its Hurricane Irma Restoration Communications.

International ARC Awards

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation was recognized with three International ARC Awards for its 

2017 Annual Report at the 32nd International ARC Awards in Hamburg, Germany. The Mercomm 

Annual Report Competition — the ARC Awards — honors standards of excellence in annual reports 

from around the world and encourages vital corporate communications and creative design. The 

publication was recognized with two Gold Awards for traditional Annual Report/Form 10-K and 

Chairman’s/President’s Letter, and a Bronze Award for Written Text. All awards were within the 

Electric and Gas Services category.

Marketing Person of the Year

The Fred Pryor Marketing Person of the Year award was presented to Danielle Mulligan, Director of 

Growth and Retention, Conservation Sales, at the Florida Natural Gas Association’s annual operating 

and marketing conference. Ms. Mulligan received the award for demonstrating outstanding performance 

and marketing efforts in the natural gas industry. Ms. Mulligan developed the strategy for the first 

hurricane storm season response including the development of practices and procedures that will serve 

as the model by which the Company will conduct itself in a storm crisis going forward.

17

Chesapeake Utilities cares about creating a healthy and safe 
environment for our employees, customers and communities, 
just as we do for our families and ourselves. We encourage 
a culture dedicated to promoting safe and reliable energy 
options; a continuously safer workplace for employees; 
and safe service offerings for customers and within our 
communities. The efforts of our employees, who proactively 
pursue a positive safety culture for our stakeholders, have led 
to industry recognition and a strong reputation for being a safe 
and reliable Company.

Throughout our business areas, our safety and compliance 
departments are very involved with our strategic planning. A 
main focus of our safety and compliance teams is supporting 
the business units to ensure safe operations for, and adherence 
to, personal, public and pipeline safety. These teams work 
closely with public officials, emergency responders, customers 
and safety advocates to promote awareness of best practices 
for safety and reliability. 

SAFETY 
CULTURE

Our commitment to safety is 

embedded in our culture and is a 

key component of our operations 

and everyday processes. 

We all are safety leaders at Chesapeake Utilities. Our 

safety culture engages and empowers employees to 

take actions that have a positive impact on safety at 

work, in the home and in our communities.

Hyun Ju Lee, Safety Data Analyst & Audit Coordinator

‘‘

”

27

American Gas Association (AGA) 
Safety Achievement Awards 
earned over the past 16 years

Safety Achievement Awards

Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company and Aspire 
Energy, earned Safety Achievement Awards from 
the AGA in 2018.

Hyun Ju Lee, Safety Data 
Analyst & Audit Coordinator

18

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

             
E M P L O Y E E - C E N T R I C   C O M P A N Y

EMPLOYEE 
INVESTMENT

At Chesapeake Utilities, we 

inspire our employees to 

perform at their best. We 

continue to invest in our people 

through programs that support 

our employees’ ambitions, 

creating value and reinforcing 

our culture. 

Kim Smith, Manager, 
Financial Planning and 
Analytics, one of our 
Aspiring Leaders Academy 
graduates.

New Heights University — Aspiring Leaders Academy

New Heights University, an educational and professional 
development program, assists our employees by enhancing 
their leadership qualities to reach their fullest potential.

In 2018, the first class of the Aspiring Leaders Academy, 
a branch of the New Heights University, completed the 
18-month leadership program. This initiative combined 
classroom sessions and independent assignments into an 
interactive learning experience for the development of 
current and future leaders throughout the Company. 

The Aspiring Leaders Academy (ALA) was a 

great experience. Not only did the courses 

help me to develop my career, but they 

helped me develop personally as well. I was 

given time for reflection, gained a better 

understanding of others and most importantly 

formed friendships with my coworkers. I 

believe that being a part of the ALA class 

has helped me become the employee and 

manager I am today.

Kim Smith, Manager, Financial 
Planning and Analytics

19

‘‘”Chesapeake Aspiring Scholars

Our employees make up the Chesapeake 
family, and by extension, their families are 
important to us. Chesapeake supports the 
aspirations of our employees and through 
the Chesapeake Aspiring Scholars 
program, the Company annually awards 
scholarship grants to students of our 
employees to assist with their educational 
pursuits at colleges, universities and 
technical schools. The program is open to 
high school seniors of employees across 
the Company. 

Centered, are 2018 Aspiring 
Scholars Alexa Curto and 
Kayla Curto, daughters of Lisa 
Pearson and Eric Pearson, 
Senior Manager, Operations and 
Compliance Engineering.

Through our Chesapeake Utilities Wellness 
program, we encourage a healthy lifestyle 
and community outreach via participation 
in our companywide Passport to Wellness 
competitions and Company-sponsored 5K 
runs/walks. 

Our Passport to Wellness initiative enables 
employees to continuously track their 
cardio health progress through Walker 
Tracker, which integrates with all major 
wearable and mobile apps. This promotes 
goal attainment, social interaction, team 
building and friendly competition.

Left to right, Stefanie Tanner, 
Dispatcher; Nicole Pratt, Dispatcher; 
and Cheryl Lemon, GIS Specialist, 
joined employee participants in 
the Company-sponsored walk 
supporting the American Cancer 
Society’s Making Strides Against 
Breast Cancer.

167M+

steps taken by 
employees via 
Passport to Wellness 

106+

sponsored runs/walks with 
employee participation

256

employee participants 
in Passport to Wellness

4,770+

miles 
employees 
walked/ran

20

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

Left to right, are Dean Holden, Manager, 
Business Development and Sales, and 
his son, Miles, who participated in the 
“Pajama Rama” 5K run/walk benefiting 
The Shepherd Place, a community 
shelter, in Dover, DE.

E M P L O Y E E - C E N T R I C   C O M P A N Y

Jamie Goodman-DeFazio, 
Inspector, knows how 
rewarding it is to do your 
best for customers and our 
Company.

EMPOWERED 
EMPLOYEES

Everyone matters at 

Chesapeake Utilities. We

continue to enhance the

work experience by building

a more inclusive culture that

provides the resources for

our employees to achieve

their goals and make

meaningful connections with

fellow employees, customers

and within our communities.

‘‘

I chose this line of work to apply my 

critical thinking and creativity to offer 

fresh perspectives and innovative 

approaches. At Chesapeake Utilities,  

I am empowered to do so and my 

colleagues welcome it.

Jamie Goodman-DeFazio, Inspector

”

Cares With A Cause

Through our Cares With a Cause program, Chesapeake 
Utilities provides employees with opportunities to serve our 
communities. Each quarter, we select a different charitable 
cause for our employees to support by volunteering time, 
donating funds or contributing items that may be needed. 

In 2018, our employees collectively partnered with local charities 
to donate supplies at the start of the school year, promote 
breast cancer awareness, collect winter coats and support 
children’s health. In honor of our veterans, we partnered with 
local food banks and collected nonperishable food and other 
items leading up to Veteran’s Day. Additionally, for the last two 
years, the Cares With a Cause program united employees to 
assist with hurricane relief efforts.

21

World Gas Conference 2018

In June 2018, the 27th World Gas Conference 
was hosted by the American Gas Association in 
Washington, D.C. This triennial conference is the 
leading global natural gas industry forum that aims 
to raise the voice of the industry while offering timely 
updates on strategic, commercial and technical issues 
facing the entire gas value chain. More than 600 
of the industry’s most senior leaders from around 
the world were featured, including Aleida Socarras, 
Vice President of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation. 
Ms. Socarras presented as a panelist in the Industry 
Insights session “Collaboration Between Natural Gas 
and LPG in Market Development.”

“Chesapeake Utilities’ Women In Energy program provides 
an outlet to share diversity of thought which strengthens an 
organization and provides a tool to encourage and support 
women in their careers with our Company.”  

Cheryl Martin, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs   

Our Women In Energy program is a forum where women at 
Chesapeake Utilities are able to connect, network and share 
their unique experiences and perspectives as professionals in 
the energy industry. Our Company includes women in careers 
at various levels ranging from accounting, communications 
and engineering to meter technicians, gas control managers, 
pipeline locators and executive leaders. The Women In 
Energy program empowers women to explore alternative 
career paths that support the changing needs of the 
Company. 

In recognition of International Women’s Day and Women’s 
History Month, female employees were honored for their 
expertise and dedication with a companywide celebration.

Visit our website, chpk.com, to learn more about our Women 
In Energy program and the highlighted stories of our female 

employees who strengthen our foundation for growth.

22

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

‘‘

The World Gas Conference provided us with an opportunity 

to showcase Chesapeake Utilities’ successful strategy 

of serving residential markets ahead of natural gas 

infrastructure with the use of propane Community Gas 

Systems (CGS). CGS customers enjoy all the benefits of gas 

while under-served areas build out to sufficient density to 

warrant expansion of natural gas service.

Aleida Socarras, Vice President, 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 

”

On March 8, we celebrated International Women’s Day and Women’s History 
Month companywide. This was one of the gatherings, held at our Energy 
Lane campus in Dover, DE. 

‘‘

I have been a Brand Champion for almost four 

years. I think the Chesapeake Cares program is an 

awesome perk of this Company. I truly enjoy being 

a Brand Champion. It is actually really fun! It can be 

challenging to keep employees engaged but I feel 

like the Cares events help to promote everyone to 

stay connected. The program is based upon positive 

reassurance and the Cares recognition adds value 

and recognizes employees for all that they do.

Stefanie Tanner, Dispatcher

”

E M P L O Y E E - C E N T R I C   C O M P A N Y

EMPLOYEE 
RECOGNITION

Employees feel valued when they 

are able to connect positive meaning 

to their work and are recognized for 

their accomplishments. Chesapeake 

Utilities cares about our employees 

and each and every one of them 

contribute to the success of our 

organization. 

One way the Company expresses 
gratitude for employees is through 
the Chesapeake Cares program. 
A team of more than 40 Brand 
Champions organizes these events 
for their colleagues. During Cares 
events, we welcome new employees, 
celebrate employee milestones 
and highlight colleagues’ efforts 
and achievements through our 
recognition program. 

Our peer-to-peer recognition 
program offers employees a way to 
acknowledge and show appreciation 
for coworkers who make a difference. 
Individuals are recognized for their 
contributions and promoting our 
shared values.

Chesapeake Utilities hosted a Family 
Fun Day Event for employees and their 
families to enjoy a day of fun activities 
with coworkers in appreciation of all 
that our employees do.

23

response, relief  
& restoration:

HURRICANE MICHAEL

‘‘

I extend my sincere thanks and appreciation to our 
employees and volunteers for their dedication to our 
customers and colleagues during the most expansive 
restoration effort in our history. Being without power for 
any period of time is challenging. We thank our customers 
for their continued patience and support while our crews 
worked to safely repair our system as a result of the 
unprecedented storm.

Kevin Webber, Senior Vice President 
and President, Florida Business Unit

”

Donnie Maxwell, 
Senior Lineman

1,200+

employees, contractors 
and volunteers helped 
with the relief efforts

a great job. You had over 12,000 

Public Utilities Company. You did 

possible to help these families and 

to get the power back on as soon as 

businesses and homes without power 

and I know that you worked really hard 

‘‘I want to thank everyone at Florida 
”

Former Florida Governor 
Rick Scott

you do to help people fully recover. 

businesses. Job well done for all that 

21

days to restore 
service

$60M+

cost of 
system 
restoration

Employees from across the Company came together to keep our workforce going throughout the 
restoration period by preparing food, doing laundry and helping with travel logistics for our employees, 
contractors and many volunteers. Pictured, left to right, are Devon Rudloff, Assistant Vice President, 
Human Resources; Morgann Firestone, Customer Service Representative; Dominica DeBrauw, (Employee 
Assistance Provider) Counselor; and Todd Kelley, Assistant Manager, Customer Care – Operations.

24

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

On October 10, 2018 Hurricane 
Michael was the first Category 
4 hurricane on record to make 
landfall in the Florida Panhandle. 
Michael’s 155 miles-per-hour 
sustained wind speed inflicted 
widespread and severe damage 
to Northwest Florida. 

The FPU Northwest Division 
electric distribution system was 
squarely in the storm’s path as it 
came onshore and moved north 
into Georgia. The eye of the 
hurricane passed over virtually 
our entire system. All of our 
13,000 customers were without 
power, with significant portions 
of our system heavily damaged.

We have a well-developed 
storm response plan. Our 
employees are highly trained 
to assess damage and quickly 
began the process of service 
restoration. Our teams have 
significant experience with 
storm restoration, including 
recent efforts after Hurricanes 
Matthew and Irma. The damage 

from Hurricane Michael’s 
unprecedented force was unlike 
anything any of our crews had 
experienced. 

Large sections of our system: 
miles of wire, thousands of poles 
and hundreds of transformers 
were on the ground. Thousands 
of trees were down in 
neighborhoods and along 
roadways across the impacted 
area. We had to cut our way 
down streets, often following 
a bulldozer, to even access our 
facilities. 

Within the first week following 
the storm, we had restored 
critical medical facilities, several 
schools, wastewater treatment 
facilities and other critical service 
and commercial facilities. In less 
than a month, all customers 
who could receive service 
were restored. FPU committed 
over $60 million to the service 
restoration, rebuilding the 
system with upgraded storm 
hardened poles and equipment. 

Rhondon Gray, 
Safety Coordinator

R E S P O N S E ,   R E L I E F   &   R E S T O R A T I O N
O U R   C O M P A N Y

Michael, I experienced firsthand 

the Company’s culture of caring for 

‘‘In Marianna, Florida after Hurricane 

the communities we serve. The first 

our employees, our customers and 

response that was heard from every 

employee was concern for the welfare 

of those affected by the storm and what 

they could do to help.  

I had employees who worked several 

hours clearing trees and streets just 

so they could get to work. Each and 

every employee who assisted during 

our electric service restoration effort 

worked extremely long hours for 

several weeks to bring hope and 

a sense of normalcy back to the 

devastated communities.

Buddy Shelley, Assistant Vice 
President of Electric Operations

”

‘‘

It’s been a humbling experience. This is 

the first time that I ever went through 

anything like this. The good part of this 

for me, from the inside looking out, is 

that you can see a lot of people come 

together, trying to help each other. 

Rhondon Gray,  

Safety Coordinator

”

”

8,400+

electric emergency 
and outage calls 
received

16,639

views to the Hurricane 
Michael Storm Safety 
landing page

25

 
connecting with our 
customers & communities

We care about our customers and the betterment of our communities.

Beyond delivering safe, efficient and reliable service, Chesapeake Utilities appreciates 
that today’s customer expectations are evolving. Customers require personalized, 
seamless and digitized interactions. As we continue to serve our customers in a safe and 
environmentally responsible manner, we are committed to providing them with enhanced 
options, more convenience and modern solutions. 

Technology and innovation have 

forever transformed the customer 

and utility interactions. Customers 

expect knowledgeable employees, 

convenience and ease when 

interacting with Chesapeake 

Utilities. We strive to understand 

customers’ needs and design 

services and interactions that value 

our customers.

Nicole Carter, Assistant Vice 
President of Customer Care

The Customer Journey

Our customers asked for more convenient ways to do business with 
us. We listened. As a result, Chesapeake Utilities, FPU and Sandpiper 
Energy embarked on an initiative to enhance the customer journey. 
Through the new service, EZ-Pay, customers are able to quickly and 
easily view and manage real-time account balances online and by 
phone, and have more flexibility in payment options. Customers may 
make payments by phone, online or using any mobile device at a 
reduced fee, or at any of our expanded network of authorized retailers.

This is the first step in our journey of bill and payment transformation. 
In the near future, customers can expect benefits such as electronic 
and paperless billing, a customer portal that will allow for the selection 
of preferences and notifications, pay by text, self-service options 
and the ability to view data such as usage history which will allow 
our customers to make actionable decisions based on real-time 
information.

26

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

‘‘”C O N N E C T I N G   W I T H   O U R   C U S T O M E R S   &   C O M M U N I T I E S

Wanda Edwards, Customer 
Service Representative

Best Gas Company 
Award

For the third consecutive year, 
Sharp Energy received awards 
for “The Best of Eastern Shore 
Gas Company” and “The Best 
of the Eastern Shore Southern 
Gas Company” as chosen by 
the readers of The Metropolitan 
Magazine. 

Sharp Energy Customer 
Experience

Sharp Energy is committed to providing 
propane customers an optimal experience 
by offering an enhanced customer portal 
that enables customers to manage their 
accounts with ease and convenience. 
Customers may view and pay their bills, 
order propane, submit service call requests 
and view past transactions online or through 
their mobile devices.

Left to right, are Andy Hesson, Vice President, Sharp Energy; Rodney 
Baylous, Manager, Customer Experience; Marybeth Bowden, Manager, 
Customer Experience; Jeff Householder, President and Chief Executive 
Officer; Suzy Hutchison, Manager, Marketing and Communications; Lynn 
Muir, Manager, Customer Experience; Eric Mays, Director, Marketing; Jim 
Moriarty; Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary 
and Chief Policy and Risk Officer; and Andrea Gaston, Customer Service 
Representative. 

15,000+

customers enrolled 
via the Sharp Energy 
customer portal

I just signed up and cannot say enough good 

things about it. I found my delivery info, at 

what price I was charged and my transactions. 

I feel up with the times now.

Customer Testimonial

27

‘‘”CARING IS ALWAYS  
IN SEASON

Year-round, we aspire to be a good neighbor by 

helping our customers and the communities in which 

we live, work and serve.

640+

$347K

3,900+

employees 
volunteered in 2018

donated  
in 2018

hours volunteered by 
Chesapeake Utilities’ 
employees in 2018

Chesapeake Utilities’ corporate citizenship is 
an integral part of our culture. Left to right, 
are Debbie Smith, Community Engagement 
Manager, with the News Hound from the 
Delaware State News.

35

years of providing 
financial assistance 

$20K

donated by 
Chesapeake 
Utilities in 2018

Employee representatives of the CHEERP join community partners who 
assist Chesapeake Utilities in support of the SHARING program.

$600K+

in grant money 
distributed over 
the last 15 years

The Chesapeake Emergency Energy Recipient 
Program (CHEERP) 
Chesapeake Utilities created the SHARING fund, an approved 

501(c) organization, with donations provided by customers, 

employees and communities. Chesapeake Utilities partners with 

Catholic Charities in Delaware and Shore UP! in Maryland to assist 

the Company’s natural gas and propane gas customers living on 

the Delmarva Peninsula who need financial assistance to pay their 

gas bills or to repair their gas appliances. Annual grants for as 

much as $1,000 are available to customers who meet the specific 

requirements including a new grant for individuals who were 

impacted by the federal government shutdown.

At Chesapeake Utilities, we care about the 

communities we serve and the SHARING program 

helps to support the elderly, ill and those facing 

financial hardships during the challenging winter 

months. We are grateful for the generosity of 

our partnering organizations, customers and 

employees who have helped us to keep families in 

need warm for the past 35 years.

Shane Breakie, Assistant Vice President, 
Chesapeake Utilities and President of CHEERP

28

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

‘‘”C O N N E C T I N G   W I T H   O U R   C U S T O M E R S   &   C O M M U N I T I E S

Energy Experts

We strive to educate our customers about efficient energy 

use and how to manage their bills and reduce their carbon 

footprint while maintaining or increasing the comfort of 

their businesses or homes. Through its Energy Expert 

program, FPU provides resources such as energy-related 

tips and advice, articles, videos, blog content and other 

downloadable materials. This energy conservation resource 

features an “Ask the Energy Expert” tool which allows 

customers to submit energy-related questions and receive a 

response from FPU energy experts. 

Left to right, are Wade Hughes, Commercial Sales Account Manager; 
Michelle McMurtry, Builder/Developer Account Manager; and “Energy 
Expert” Scott Ranck, Manager, Conservation.

As our Company thrives, we aim to make a difference in people’s lives and 
inspire others to give back, making a positive impact. FPU sponsored and 
participated in the Chipola Area Habitat for Humanity Women Build event 
in Marianna, FL. Left to right, are Janine Roye, Administrative Assistant; 
Kate Jones, Senior Meter Reader; Sally Jones, Quality and Customer 
Experience Analysis Supervisor; Virginia Nail, Senior Meter Reader; Donna 
Fowler, Stores Manager; and Janet Register, Meter Reader.

Partnerships with local and national organizations that encourage the 
betterment of our communities continue to be a major part of our legacy 
of giving. Sharp Energy was a sponsor of the “Help Our Kids” radiothon, 
held at Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children in Wilmington, DE. 
Left, is Krystal McGill, Financial Administration Manager.

Pay It Forward Campaign

In appreciation of our Top Workplace recognition for the seventh 

consecutive year, we thanked our customers and communities 

for their ongoing support through our “Pay It Forward” 

Campaign. For a week in November, participating coffee shops 

in our service areas offered free coffee courtesy of Chesapeake 

Utilities. It was our way of giving back and showing our 

appreciation of our customers and communities.

297%

increase in new visitors to the corporate 
website during the campaign

29

our commitment 
to sustainability

As a leading energy provider for more than 150 years, we 
uphold our aspiring and caring culture.

We are a responsible Company that continues to honor our 
obligation to operate in a safe and environmentally friendly manner. 
As part of our commitment, our employees identify better and 
innovative ways to serve our customers, grow our businesses and 
support our communities to facilitate sustainable practices. 

For the fourth consecutive year, Chesapeake Utilities 
partnered with the Delaware Chapter of The Nature 
Conservancy in support of the conservation and protection 
of natural resources in Delaware. In March 2018, more than 40 
employee volunteers and family members spent a day at the 
conservancy’s Ponders Tract Preserve in Milton, DE, planting 
more than 60 native trees and shrubs, fixing deer fencing, 
restoring the main trails and trimming pine trees along the 
trails. In September 2018, our employees participated in the 
Dogfish Dash in Milton, DE. As a longtime Company sponsor, 
employee runners/walkers and event volunteers supported 
the Dogfish Head Brewery’s annual event which benefited the 
Delaware Chapter of The Nature Conservancy.

30

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

Amanda Chi, Director  
of Business Planning

ENVIRONMENTAL 
SOLUTIONS

Chesapeake Utilities is a 

diversified energy provider that 

draws upon its legacy of expertise 

to conduct business with 

environmental responsibility.

We are strongly committed to 
operating in a green manner and 
increasing environmental benefits 
in our communities. As part of 
our strategic approach, our teams 
strive to identify solutions for more 
efficient energy use, generate 
savings for our customers and 
reduce the carbon emissions within 
our business operations.

40+

employees 
volunteered to 
support The Nature 
Conservancy

280+

hours volunteered 
by employees at The 
Nature Conservancy

Our employees are the foundation of our growth. 
Our aspiring and caring nature are at the heart of 
everything that we do. For several years we have 
participated in an annual volunteer event with The 
Nature Conservancy. Our team eagerly looks forward 
to enhancing the appearance and well-being of the 
conservancy’s preserves, leaving them for visitors to 
explore and enjoy their natural beauty. 

Steve Thompson, Senior Vice President 
and a board member of the Delaware 
Chapter of The Nature Conservancy 

‘‘”ENVIRONMENTAL 

SOLUTIONS

O U R   C O M M I T M E N T   T O   S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y

2018 Air Quality Awareness Champion 

The Clean Cities Coalition - U.S. Department of Energy helps residents, businesses and fleet 

operators to work together to reduce the use of petroleum, develop regional economic 

opportunities and improve air quality. Chesapeake Utilities partners with the Delaware Clean Cities 

Coalition to improve air quality and increase the use of cleaner fuels in transportation. Chesapeake 

Utilities is also a member of the Maryland Clean Cities Coalition. FPU is an active member of the 

Florida Clean Cities Coalition, participating in three Florida chapters. We were sponsors of the 2018 

National Clean Cities Annual Meeting.

Green Globes Certificate

The Energy Lane campus earned Green Globes Certification by the Green Building Initiative. 

The office building and warehouse are nationally recognized for maintaining a higher 

standard of environmental integrity.

CNG

Chesapeake Utilities provides environmentally 

friendly alternative fuels for vehicles including 

compressed natural gas (CNG) to reduce 

emissions in transportation applications. 

Our new Energy Lane campus in Dover, DE, 
features Chesapeake Utilities’ new CNG fueling 
station for public use on the Delmarva Peninsula. 
This station provides CNG for fleets and personal 
Natural Gas Vehicles. We have worked with the 
state of Delaware and the Clean Cities Coalition 
to create grants for alternative fuel vehicles 
and to develop a clean fuel corridor along the 
Delmarva Peninsula. 

Why CNG-Powered Vehicles vs. 
Vehicles Using Gasoline or Diesel?

85%

30%

lower NOx emissions

reduced Greenhouse 
Gas Emissions

30%–40%

lower CO2 emissions

Our businesses are active members of the Clean Cities Coalition - U.S. Department of Energy and 
participate in events and conferences that promote environmental responsibility and the use of 
cleaner fuels in transportation. Pictured is Ben Semchuck, Manager, Growth & Retention Sales, at 
a Florida National Gas Association event.

Chesapeake Utilities' compressed natural gas (CNG) fueling station is the only public CNG 
fueling station on the Delmarva Peninsula. Pictured is a representative from the Kent County 
Tourism Office using the CNG fueling station for The Villager, the Tourism Office’s mobile 
visitor center fueled by natural gas.

31

O U R   C O M M I T M E N T   T O   S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y

CHP

Chesapeake Utilities uses combined heat and 

power (CHP) to provide significant efficiency 

improvements and cost savings while reducing the 

overall environmental impact.

Our natural gas-fired Eight Flags Energy CHP Plant 
on Amelia Island, FL, generates approximately 21 
megawatts of baseload power producing enough 
electricity to meet on average 50 percent of Amelia 
Island’s demand. The CHP plant was designed to 
produce electricity, steam and water with less air 
pollutants and water usage, meeting a 78 percent 
efficiency target. 

The CHP plant is modeled to enhance the overall 
electric grid resiliency, since on-site power units 
do not rely on power transmission lines — keeping 

power on for customers in times of need. During 
major hurricanes, the CHP Plant had critical facilities, 
such as hospitals and larger commercial and 
industrial customers in operation soon after the 
storms had ended. 

Chesapeake Utilities has assisted customers with 
the implementation of three CHP projects on the 
Delmarva Peninsula as a result of its commitment 
to providing valuable energy options to customers. 
The Company provides natural gas service to the 
CHP plants at Peninsula Regional Medical Center in 
Salisbury, MD; the Dogfish Head Brewery in Milton, 
DE; and the Seaford School District in Seaford, DE.

78%

efficiency target achieved 
at Eight Flags CHP Plant

AUTOGAS

Propane AutoGas is a viable alternative fuel for automobiles that reduces emissions 
and lowers costs. As a member of Alliance AutoGas, Sharp Energy installs and supports 
propane vehicle conversion systems for vehicle fleets and provides on-site fueling 
infrastructure. With 48 AutoGas stations in operation in Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, 
Pennsylvania and Florida, Sharp Energy has deployed 87 propane-powered vehicles 
within our own fleet displacing approximately 155,000 gallons of gasoline annually.

O
T
P

25%U

reduced Greenhouse 
Gas Emissions

20%
60%

reduced NOx

reduced CO2

3M+

gallons of gasoline 
and diesel 
displaced in 2018

Eric Mays, Director, Marketing, explains 
the benefits of AutoGas and a propane 
vehicle conversion system at our 
Investor Days event. 

32

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

 
marlin gas services

A STORY OF GROWTH AND INNOVATION

M A R L I N   G A S   S E R V I C E S

In December 2018, Chesapeake Utilities acquired the assets of Marlin Gas Transport, Inc. and established a new 
subsidiary, Marlin Gas Services, LLC (Marlin). Marlin operates a fleet of compressed natural gas (CNG) tube trailers that 
provide mobile gas transport services to transmission and distribution pipelines and end-use customers. The company’s 
primary terminal location is in Spring Hill, FL. Over the past 15 years, Marlin has focused its business on the Southeast 
and Mid-Atlantic, but delivery capabilities extend nationwide. Marlin has transported over 7 billion cubic feet of gas. 

Chesapeake Utilities’ Florida business unit has been a major Marlin customer. Over the past several years, FPU has relied 
on Marlin to provide temporary service to numerous expansion areas prior to installation of permanent pipeline facilities. 
We believe that our experience as a Marlin customer gives us the unique insight into the operational, regulatory and 
financial implications of deploying CNG tankers. We will leverage those insights to market Marlin’s services to similarly 
situated pipeline and distribution customers. The increased capital availability and support offered by Chesapeake 
Utilities will enable us to significantly expand Marlin’s targeted service area.  

Marlin is a premier provider of virtual pipeline solutions. 

We are able to provide uninterrupted access to gas 

during planned and unplanned pipeline outages, as well 

as providing supply to customers not directly connected 

to pipeline supply. As demand for natural gas continues 

to increase, Marlin offers a great opportunity to expand 

Chesapeake Utilities’ gas service options and reach new 

customers in new markets.

Kevin McCrackin, Director, CNG/LNG Services

Marlin’s capabilities 
are a perfect solution 
for transporting clean, 
renewable natural gas 
from landfills and other 
renewable sources to 
pipeline systems for 
distribution. 

33

‘‘”L E A D E R S H I P

leadership

Jeffry M. 
Householder
President & Chief 
Executive Officer

Stephen C. 
Thompson
Senior Vice President; 
President and Chief 
Operating Officer, 
Eastern Shore Natural 
Gas Company; Aspire 
Energy; Sandpiper 
Energy; and Sharp 
Energy, Inc.

Beth W. Cooper
Executive Vice 
President, Chief 
Financial Officer & 
Assistant Corporate 
Secretary

James F. Moriarty
Executive Vice 
President, General 
Counsel, Corporate 
Secretary and Chief 
Policy & Risk Officer

Kevin J. Webber
Senior Vice President 
and President, Florida 
Business Unit

Louis J. Anatrella
Vice President 
and Chief Human 
Resources Officer

Vikrant A. Gadgil
Vice President and Chief 
Information Officer

Mark L. Eisenhower
Vice President, 
Strategic Planning & 
Development

34

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

Andrew R. Hesson
Vice President, Sharp 
Energy, Inc.

John J. Lewnard
Vice President of Business 
Development

Tom E. Mahn
Vice President and 
Treasurer

Cheryl M. Martin
Vice President, Regulatory 
Affairs

Aleida F. Socarras
Vice President, 
Chesapeake Utilities 
Corporation

Joseph D. Steinmetz
Vice President and 
Controller

Jeffrey R. Tietbohl
Vice President, 
Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company

Douglas M. Ward
Vice President,  
Aspire Energy

Shane E. Breakie
Assistant Vice President, 
Chesapeake Utilities

Nicole T. Carter
Assistant Vice President 
of Customer Care

Michael D. Cassel
Assistant Vice President, 
Florida Public Utilities 
Company

Alfred V. Gallo, III
Assistant Vice President, 
Peninsula Energy Services 
Company

William D. Hancock
Assistant Vice President, 
Peninsula Energy Services 
Company

Barry D. Kennedy
Assistant Vice President 
of Natural Gas Operations, 
Florida Public Utilities 
Company

Devon S. Rudloff
Assistant Vice President, 
Human Resources

Drane A. Shelley
Assistant Vice President 
of Electric Operations, 
Florida Public Utilities 
Company

35

L E A D E R S H I P

36

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

36

board of directors

BACK ROW (LEFT TO RIGHT)

FRONT ROW (LEFT TO RIGHT)

Ronald G. Forsythe, Jr., Ph.D. 
Director Since 2014

Chief Executive Officer,  
Qlarant Corporation, 
Easton, Maryland

Dianna F. Morgan 
Director Since 2008

Former Senior Vice President, 
Walt Disney World Co., Orlando, 
Florida; Past Chair of the 
Board of Trustees, University of 
Florida,  
Gainesville, Florida

Calvert A. Morgan, Jr. 
Director Since 2000

Director and Former Special 
Advisor,  
WSFS Financial Corporation, 
Wilmington, Delaware; Director 
and Vice Chair, 
Wilmington Savings Fund 
Society (WSFS Bank), 
Wilmington, Delaware; Retired 
Chair, President & Chief Executive 
Officer, PNC Bank, Delaware, 
Wilmington, Delaware

Audit Committee

Thomas J. Bresnan — CHAIR
Ronald G. Forsythe, Jr., Ph.D.
Thomas P. Hill, Jr.
Dennis S. Hudson, III

Compensation Committee

Dianna F. Morgan — CHAIR
Dennis S. Hudson, III
Calvert A. Morgan, Jr. 

Corporate Governance Committee

Calvert A. Morgan, Jr. — CHAIR
Eugene H. Bayard
Paul L. Maddock, Jr.

Investment Committee

Jeffry M. Householder - CHAIR 
Thomas J. Bresnan
Thomas P. Hill, Jr.
Calvert A. Morgan, Jr.
John R. Schimkaitis

Jeffry M. Householder 
Director Since 2019

President & Chief Executive 
Officer,  
Chesapeake Utilities 
Corporation

John R. Schimkaitis 
Director Since 1996

Chair of the Board, Retired 
President & Chief Executive 
Officer,  
Chesapeake Utilities 
Corporation

Michael P. McMasters 
Director Since 2010

Retired President & Chief 
Executive Officer, 
Chesapeake Utilities 
Corporation

Eugene H. Bayard 
Director Since 2006

Of Counsel,  
Morris James LLP,  
Georgetown, Delaware

Paul L. Maddock, Jr. 
Director Since 2009

Chief Executive Officer  
and Manager, Palamad, LLC, 
Palm Beach, Florida

Dennis S. Hudson, III 
Director Since 2009

Chair & Chief Executive Officer, 
Seacoast National Bank & 
Seacoast Banking Corporation 
of Florida,  
Stuart, Florida

Thomas J. Bresnan 
Director Since 2001

President, Global LT, Troy, 
Michigan; Owner & President, 
Accounting & Business 
School of the Rockies and 
Denver Accounting Services, 
Greenwood Village, Colorado

Thomas P. Hill, Jr. 
Director Since 2006

Retired Vice President of 
Finance & Chief Financial 
Officer,  
Exelon Energy Delivery 
Company,  
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

36

37

 
 
 
 
 
 
A STRONG 

foundation 

FOR GROWTH

Thank you to our employees!

Keon Aarons 
Joseph Abba 
Jon Abrams 
Joseph Adams 
William Adams 
Nehal Ahmed 
Ronald Alfaro 
Crystal Allegretti 
Christopher Allen 
Catherine Alt 
Clara Altvater 
David Amos 
Stephen Amos 
Louis Anatrella 
Zachary Anderson 
Charles Andrews 
Joshua Annand 
Korri Antoine 
Harold Arnold 
Steven Ashcraft 
Mary Atkins 
Ashley Atkins-
Dellafield 
Martha Audet 
Joanne Auguste 
Yvette Avila 
Nnajiaye Awomokorie 
Bradford Bacci 
Kahli Baker 
Keith Baker 
Brittnee Baker 
Kenneth Baker 
David Baldinger
Gregory Ballheim 
Danielle Ballinger 
Bernita Banks 
Michael Banks 
Maureen Barr 
Tina Barrington 
Francis Barton 
Maxine Bashford 
Jeffrey Bates 
Michael Bates 
William Bather 
Thomas Bather 
Martin Batze 
Jill Bauersmith 
Joanah Baugh 
Eric Baurys 
Rodney Baylous 
Andrew Bayne 
Deanna Beadle 
Timothy Beidler 
Matthew Bell 
Dina Bellechases 
Lynn Bellinger 
Bryan Benini 
Rachel Beringer 
Christopher Beun 
Justin Beverly 
Andrew Bevis 
John Biddle 
Charles Biddle 
Erik Billy 
Nicholas Bishop
Blake Bjorklund 

Roger Blades 
Katie Blades 
Fred Bland 
Joshua Bland 
Michael Blankenship 
Greg Blazina 
Larry Bledsoe 
Bryan Bloch 
Curtis Boatright 
Crystal Bohlman 
John Bolling 
Eric Bollinger 
Renee Bolyard 
Debra Bonner 
Christopher Bonney 
Peter Bono 
Alfred Boone 
Marybeth Bowden 
Hunter Bowles 
Richard Brabson 
David Bradford 
James Bradshaw 
Victoria Brand 
Shane Breakie 
Steven Brennan 
Sherrii Brentari 
Richard Brewer 
Nathan Brisker 
Mason Brock 
Natasha Brooks 
Terrance Brown 
Todd Brown 
Nikisha Brown 
Michael Brown 
Charles Brown 
Timothy Brown 
Jevon Brown
Clinton Brown 
Wayne Bryan 
Gary Bryant 
Charles Buckalew 
Tyler Budd 
Purogami Buddha 
Edward Burgess 
John Burke 
Danial Burkhart 
Aubrey Burris 
Shelly Burrowes 
Dale Butcher 
Linda Cacella
Christopher Cafarella 
Rodney Calhoun 
Marielle Cameron 
Terry Campbell 
Jason Campbell 
Crystal Campbell 
Robert Candelario 
Thomas Canfield 
Christopher Canino 
Michael Cantwell 
Patricia Caouette
Belinda Caplinger 
Nemesio Caraballo 
Jacob Carlson 
Ronald Carlton 
Richard Carrick 

Sergio Carrillo
Jonathan Carrington 
Danita Carroll 
Crosby Carswell 
Nicole Carter 
Michael Carter 
Bruce Carver
Jacob Case 
Sean Case 
Michael Cassel 
Eileen Cassidy 
Richard Castellanos 
Pablo Castro 
Virginia Cespedes 
Autumn Chalabala 
Justin Chambers 
James Champion 
Cody Chance 
Luice Chang
Christopher Chapman 
Nixon Charles 
Foster Chatham 
Howard Chelton 
Amanda Chi 
Shailin Chokshi
Steven Christine 
Jon Chullin 
Virginia Cichowski 
William Clardy 
Jennifer Clausius 
Richard Cleveland
Michael Clevens 
Rita Clifford 
Laura Clinton 
Michael Cluley 
Howard Cohee III 
Roger Cohey
Anthony Coker 
Marianne Coker 
Denise Collins 
Cody Collins 
Ryan Collins 
Brad Collins
Darren Coney 
J. Patrick Conlon 
Patricia Connors 
Robert Constantine 
Mateo Constantino
Beth Cooper 
Susan Cooper 
Shirley Cope 
Deanna Cordova 
Zachary Cordrey 
Janet Coughlin
Clarence Council 
Doreen Cox 
Jessica Coxe 
George Craig 
Katelyn Craig 
John Cramer 
John Crawford
Larry Creswell 
Sabrina Cribbs 
Kelly Cristiano 
Nicholas Cronell 
Michael Cross 

Eugene Crowe 
Cindy Cruz 
Amber Cumbie 
Matthew Currie 
P. Cutshaw 
David Dagg 
Colleen Dalious 
Ellen Davies 
Carl Davis
Sydney Davis 
Sarah Davis 
Sherrie Davis 
Ashley Dawson 
Gary Dean 
Susan Dean 
Matthew Dean
David DeCaro 
Dawn DeCosta 
Zuleika DeJesus 
Daniel Delaney 
George Delano 
Scott DeLong 
Joshua Denham 
Gregory Denston 
David Detrick 
Matthew Dewey 
Joseph DeYounks 
Cecile DiFrancesco 
Larry Dixon 
Matthew Dolin 
Kristin Dondarski 
Marvin Dorsey 
Randall Drake 
Jeffrey DuBose 
Danielle Duerr
George Dulin 
Denise Dunham 
Jacob Durbin 
Nicole Durham 
Wanda Edwards 
Jonathan Eisenhauer
Mark Eisenhower 
Robert Elgesem 
James Elliott 
Sherry Ennis 
Bonnie Erdek 
Raymond Esparza 
Roger Estrada 
Virginia Evans 
Matthew Everngam 
Steven Farkas 
Calvin Favors 
Gregory Fentress 
James Ferguson 
Laura Fevrin 
Jose Figueroa 
Garry Finch 
Christina Finigan 
Vincent Fiorelli 
Morgann Firestone 
Champe Fisher 
Connie Fisher 
Emma Fisher 
Jason Fitchett 
Clara Flanigan 
Jose Flores

David Flowers 
James Flowers 
Bradley Flowers 
Alvin Foran 
Karl Forde 
Sherry Foster 
Donna Fowler
George Freeman 
Roger Freeze 
Raul Frenes 
Debra Frye 
Aaron Fullenkamp 
Charles Gabbard 
Vikrant Gadgil 
Farisha Gajadhar 
Alfred Gallo 
Linda Gamble 
Michael Gandee 
Kimberley Gantz 
Jason Garfola
Sheila Garris 
Alex Garver 
Andrea Gaston 
Bryan Gaugler 
Corey Gebhardt 
Ivan Gibbs 
Samuel Gilchriest
Marjorie Gill 
Elizabeth Gilligan 
Quade Gilmore 
Tiffany Giroux 
Anthony Glenn 
Jennifer Gnann 
Brian Goff 
Mia Goins 
Jesus Gonzalez 
Alan Good 
Jamie Goodman-
DeFazio 
Deltric Gordon 
William Gradie
Charlotte Grady 
Miranda Granger 
Rhondon Gray 
Teresa Gretencord 
Rebecca Grier 
John Griffin 
Donna Grimm 
Darryl Grooms 
Chad Grosch 
Charles Gsvind 
Vicky Guessford 
David Guimont 
Joseph Guyette 
Vivian Gyening 
Bruce Haase 
Randall Hagan 
Eric Hagans 
George Hall 
Howard Hall 
Cole Hall
Keith Hall 
Sherri Haller 
Alexander Halterman 
William Hancock 
Scott Handges 

Larry Handy 
Ali Hanif
Carol Hardin 
Sarah Hardy 
Gary Hardy 
Brian Harner 
Duane Harrell 
Cathy Harrington 
Lynette Harris
Caleb Harris 
Alfonzo Harris 
Kevin Harris 
Joseph Harrison 
Janet Hart 
David Hart 
Gabriel Hart 
Gregory Hartney 
Eric Haskins 
Adam Hastie 
Debra Hayden 
Evan Hayes 
Jim Hayhurst 
Ramon Hearn 
Chris Hebert 
David Henault 
Matthew Henderson 
Roger Hendricks 
James Henshaw 
Connie Hensley 
John Herko 
Joel Hermogenes 
William Hermstedt 
Constantino 
Hernandez 
Jose Hernandez 
Andrew Hesson
Steve Hetland 
Michael Hickey 
Jason Hickman 
Kortney Hill 
John Hill 
Fred Hill 
Christopher Hines
Chad Hipsher 
Maldon Hoffman 
Sand Hoffman 
Dean Holden 
Clarence Holland 
Nathaniel Holley
Beth Hoppes 
Richard Hoppes 
Jeffry Householder 
Charles Howell 
Larry Howton 
Edward Hudson
Lee Anne Huffman 
Laura Hufschmidt 
Allison Hughart 
Alton Hughes 
Stephanie Hughley-
Grant
Chucky Hull 
Andre Hunter 
Jarvis Hunter 
Jessica Husted 
Catherine Hutchison 

38

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation | 2018 Annual Report

Gerald Hynson
Michael Ilnisky 
James Ingalls 
Michael Ingley 
Daniel Isner 
Tevin Jackson 
David Jackson
Sean Jackson 
Jean Jaentschke 
William Jarrett 
Tanya Jensen 
James Jestice 
Todd Jezewski
Yugita John 
David Johnson 
Marvin Johnson 
Randy Johnson 
Anthony Johnson 
Kevin Johnson
Jennifer Johnson 
Kevin Jones 
Jeffrey Jones 
Garth Jones 
Aaron Jones 
Ray Jones 
Sarah Jones 
Jeremiah Jones 
DeShaundra Jones 
Teja Jones 
Anna Jones 
Katherine Jones 
Charles Jordan 
Cody Justice 
Mohamed Kamagate 
John Kara 
John Keen 
Rosa Keip 
Stephanie Keithley 
Robert Kelley 
Brendan Kelly
John Kelly 
Barry Kennedy 
David Kerns 
Jason Ketner 
Steven Keyser 
Jeremi Kidwell 
Garry Killmon
James Kimmel 
Ronald King 
Jonathan Kliewer 
Lisa Klotz 
David Knight 
Jerry Knox 
Andrew Kochman
Melissa Koenig 
George Kohan 
Thomas Kosikowski 
Amy Kouse 
Barbara Kowal 
Marie Kozel 
Robert Krebs 
William Kriss 
Nikki Krumm 
Kerry Kulha 
Daryl Kunkel 
Evan Kuzmenski 
Gwen Kyle-Jackson 
Roger LaCharite 
Michael Lackey 
Kira Lake 
Paul Lalancette 
Edward Lalo 
Lisa Lambert 
Johnny Lance 
Conner Landon 
Frank Lane 
Lisa Lannon 
Claude Larmonie 
Stacey Laster 
James Laub 
Daniel Laughman 
Jeffrey Leach 
Joshua Leager 
Leanna LeBron 
Hyun Ju Lee 
Richard Legar 
Robert Legar 
Cheryl Lemon 
Jerry Lewis 
John Lewis 
John Lewnard 
Patricia Limoli 
Martin Linton 
James Liott 
Dale Littleton 
Lynn Lloyd

Ana Londono 
Brian Loucks 
Theresa Ludlow 
Douglas Luff 
Anthony Lugo 
Christopher Lunsford 
Amber Lyburn 
Lorraine Lynch 
Lula Lynn-Aladuge 
Emily Mabrey 
Richard Maccari 
Trever Mackey 
Shane Magnus 
Thomas Mahn 
Lauri Major 
Thomas Malice 
Christopher Malkar 
James Malloy 
Nicole Manno
Danielle Manuel 
Robert Marsh 
David Marshall 
John Martin 
Colette Martin 
Cheryl Martin 
Daniel Massengill 
Edward Matthews 
Christopher Matthews 
Joanie Maxwell 
Donald Maxwell 
Jacqueline Mayan 
Eric Mays 
Aaron Mazur 
Patricia McBride 
Janet McCabe 
Kimberly McCarty 
Michael McCarty
Jesse McCleary 
Stacey McClements 
James McCloskey 
John McComb 
Laura McCoy 
Kevin McCoy
Kevin McCrackin 
William McDaniel 
John McDonnell 
Steven McDougall 
Krystal McGill 
Joseph McGinley 
Tyler McGuyrt 
Alyssa McIntosh 
Thomas McKnight 
Brennan McKone 
Candace McMurtry
Joshua McNeil 
Lynn McNeill 
Tracy McVay 
Michele Medina 
Andrew Menzies 
Vincent Messina
Thomas Metts 
Christopher Metzger 
Jennifer Meyer 
Shaun Middleton 
Jacqueline Mildren
Elizabeth Miller 
Kirk Miller 
Michael Miller 
John Miller 
Jeremy Miller 
Timothy Miller 
Micky Miller
Lisa Minnich 
Jaclyn Minor 
Christine Minton 
Michael Mitchell 
Marjorie Mitchell 
Steven Mitchell
Cedric Mitchell 
Jamie Monaco 
Kelly Monaco 
Ronald Monce, Jr. 
Lila Monds 
Audra Mongo 
David Montgomery 
Jody Montgomery 
Joseph Moody 
Phil Mooney 
Kyle Moore 
Gregory Moore 
Phillip Moore 
Don Moore 
James Moore 
Douglas Moreland 
Garfield Morgan 
Sherri Morgan 

James Moriarty
Leo Moron 
Laura Morris 
Florence Muir 
Justin Mulcahy 
Danielle Mulligan 
Arleen Murchison 
Shawn Murphy 
Daniel Murphy 
Geraldine Murray 
Randall Musselman 
Virginia Nail 
Michelle Napier
Ryan Nellans 
Jason Nester 
Brian Nethers 
Jason Newcomb 
Joshua Ney 
Jonathon Nichols 
Lucas Nievas Machado 
Eric Norris 
Christopher Nuebling 
Ana Nunez 
William O’Brien 
Mario O’Campo 
Joseph O’Donnell 
Lashonda Oliver 
Philip Onsomu 
John Outten 
Omar Owens 
Cynthia Pagan 
Eli Page 
Branden Palmer 
Tiffany Palmer 
Adam Panichella 
Connie Papafio Osei 
Mark Parker 
Robin Parker 
Richard Parks
Kelley Parmer 
Marilyn Parrish 
Brian Parsons 
Jeremy Parsons 
James Parsons 
Lee Patrick 
Ronald Patrick 
Sharran Patterson 
Lewis Peacock 
Eric Pearson 
Ricky Peek 
Michael Pendexter 
Glenn Pendleton 
Kimberly Perdue 
Nicholas Pereira 
Daniel Perry 
Matthew Perry 
Robert Petenbrink 
Andrew Peters 
Michael Petito 
Matthew Petito 
John Petro 
Kaitlyn Pezoldt 
Jacque Phillips 
Michelle Phillips
Kayla Phillips 
Gary Pierce 
Julie Pietraszko 
Jacqueline Pilecki 
Tina Pileggi 
Michele Piper-Afriyie 
Michael Plante 
David Pluta 
Gregg Poggi 
Keith Pomeroy 
Michael Ponder 
John Poole 
Brad Poole 
Michael Popovich 
Adiel Portales 
Brent Porter 
Matthew Portilla 
Manickam Prasad 
Nicole Pratt 
Lacey Priestley
Craig Provenzano 
Jorge Puentes 
Keven Purnell 
Adam Quann 
Darrel Ragoonath 
Stephanie Rahn 
Sean Ramey 
Glen Ranck 
Barry Rankin 
John Rantz 
Tina Rawls 
Christopher Redd 

Edward Rees 
Michael Reffue 
Janet Register 
Dwayne Reinert 
Dawn Reiss 
Jeffrey Reitz 
Jonathan Remy 
Michael Reno 
William Rice 
Rhonda Richardson 
David Richardson 
Yvonne Richmond 
Samuel Richter 
Marianne Riding 
Robin Rigby 
Robert Riley 
Jessica Rivera 
Eliazer Rivera Vargas 
Heather Rizo-Patron 
Danielle Roach 
Marcy Robbins 
Stephanie Roberts 
Gregory Robinson 
William Rodriguez 
Rita Rogers 
Perry Rogers 
Adam Rogers 
Percy Roland 
James Rolle 
Jose Rosales 
Richard Ross 
Cora Ross 
Walter Rossetto
Paige Rossillo 
Lynn Roth 
Susan Roulston 
Janine Roye 
Mayer Rubin 
Joel Ruderman 
Devon Rudloff
Mauro Ruini 
David Russell 
Winston Russell 
Matthew Ryan 
Melanie Ryder 
Phillip Sabol 
Taina Sailor
Donnell Sample 
Mary Santaella 
Jacqueline Santana 
Zurehida Santiago 
Jesse Sapp 
Kelsey Sapp 
Dawn Sard 
Stuart Sauk 
Herman Savage 
Michael Scher 
David Schieferstein 
Paul Schmidlin 
Joshua Schneider
Jeremy Schneider 
Penny Schoolfield 
Daniel Schrey 
Timothy Schroff 
Frederick Schur 
Walter Schwaninger 
Francene Scott-Diehl 
Meredith Sebastian 
Ryan Sebastian 
Robert See, Jr. 
Lisa Sell
Ben Semchuck 
Steven Senft 
Andrew Sergovic 
James Shadd 
Robert Shatzer 
Drane Shelley 
Jared Shelton 
Richard Shertzer 
Kevin Shockley 
Karen Shockley 
David Shreckengost 
Ramiro Sicre 
Richard Simmons 
Christopher Simmons 
Earl Simpson 
Thomas Simpson 
Allyson Singletary 
Francis Sluka 
Margaret Sluka 
Aaron Sluss 
Stephen Smith 
James Smith 
Kimberly Smith 
Kristopher Smith 
Harry Smith 

Debbie Smith 
Kevin Smith 
Trisha Smith 
Jarrett Smith 
James Snell 
Thomas Snellgrove 
Dwayne Snyder 
Brian Snyder 
Amy Lynn Snyder 
Aleida Socarras 
Leona Solomon 
Chad Souder 
Summer Soukup
George Speerin 
Kenneth Spencer 
Steven Spigelmire 
Henry Spikes 
Warren Springer 
Julie St. Clair 
Ronald Stafford 
Melissa Stamper 
Thomas Stanley 
Kevin Staudt 
Marcus Stebelton 
Joseph Steinmetz 
Llewellyn Stepherson 
Christopher Stevenson 
Vince Stewart 
James Stewart 
Joseph Stimpfling 
Marissa Stipa 
Michael Stock 
Theresa Streadwick 
Christopher Stryker 
Jenna Stuart 
Ronald Stubbs 
Jeffrey Sturgill 
Marc Sturtevant 
Jonathan Swan 
Steve Sword 
Daniela Sylvester 
Debra Szymanski 
Rocco Tamayo 
Stefanie Tanner 
Randy Taylor 
Olimbi Telford 
David Tennant 
Brian Terraciano 
Donnie Tew
Gregory Tharp 
John Thielemann 
Sheila Thomas 
Veronica Thomas 
Stephen Thompson 
Joann Thompson 
Janice Thompson 
Mark Thompson 
Patricia Thornton 
John Thyng 
Jeffrey Tietbohl
Christopher Tietjen 
Dana Tindall 
Lynann Titler 
Michael Torres 
Stephen Tracey 
Dale Treuber 
James Trott 
Lauren Truitt 
Michael Tucker 
Nicholas Tucker 
Stephen Tull 
Jeffrey Turner 
David Tuttle
Kendall Tyus 
Preston Uhl 
Janine Urbanski 
James Ussery, Jr. 
Rafael Valentin 
Cory Vance 
Jennifer Vandervort 
Fernando Vanleeuwen 
Nicole Vanmaaren 
Fred Vaughn 
Barbara Velasquez 
Alayda Velasquez 
Joselyn Velez 
Kevin Vickers 
Erika Vogel 
Travis Vogl 
Joey Voyard 
Frankie Voyles 
Donald Vrsan 
Heidi Wagner 
Darrell Wagner 
Julia Waldrop 
Dana Walker 

Markea Walker-Brown 
Robert Wallace 
Shaun Waller 
Rachel Walls 
Hunter Walsh 
Crystal Waples 
Brittany Ward 
Douglas Ward
Brent Warfield 
Ruth Warner 
Ernest Washington 
Heidi Watkins 
Victoria Weaver-Martin 
John Webb
David Webb 
Kevin Webber 
Steve Webster 
Daniel Webster 
Daniel Wehr 
Christopher Weidman 
Jeffrey Weiss 
Andrew Weitz 
Teresa Welch 
Kevin Wells 
Melissa Wells 
Richard Welsh 
Vanora Werner 
Robert West 
Tammy Wheatley 
Theodore Wheaton 
Carla Wheeler 
James Whitaker 
Michael White 
Rena White 
Darcy White 
Ward Whiteside 
Danny Whitley 
Tony Whitlock 
David Wicks 
Neal Widdowson
Jason Widgeon 
Geoffrey Wight 
Marquis Wilborn 
Frank Wildermuth 
Yvonne Williams 
Donald Williams 
Teirra Williams 
Horace Williams 
Janie Williams 
Malcolm Williams 
Andre Williams 
Jeffrey Willinghan 
Arnell Willis 
Sophia Willoughby 
Travis Wilson 
Glen Wilson 
Samuel Wilson 
Mark Wilson
Tamara Wimberly 
Linda Winston 
Chaneta Wise 
Harry Wise 
Charles Wisniewski 
Matthew Witt 
Max Wood 
Jason Woody 
April Wothers 
Geoffrey Wright 
Richard Wunsch 
Brian Yost 
Kyle Young 
Keith Young 
Curtis Young 
Novem Yu 
Magbis Zaldivar 
Leslie Zambrano 
Ramiro Zambrano 
Heidi Zanecosky
Jason Zelinski 
Auberjenois Zerrad 
Duane Ziller 
Philip Zimmer 
Amy Zook

Note: Chesapeake 
Utilities Corporation 
employees as of 
3/13/19.

39

 UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

      For the Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 2018 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 001-11590 

CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

State of Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

51-0064146

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

909 Silver Lake Boulevard, Dover, Delaware 19904
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

302-734-6799
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Common Stock—par value per share $0.4867

Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes 

    No 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes 

     No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during 
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for 
the past 90 days.    Yes 

    No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of 
Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such 
files).    Yes 

    No 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will 
not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or 
any amendment to this Form 10-K.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an 
emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" 
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or 
revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. 

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes 

    No 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
The aggregate market value of the common shares held by non-affiliates of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation as of June 30, 2018, the last business day of its 
most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the last sale price on that date, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, was approximately $1.3 
billion. 

The number of shares of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation's common stock outstanding as of February 15, 2019 was 16,378,821.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part II and Part III, which Proxy Statement shall 
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of registrant's fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION

FORM 10-K

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I

Item 1. Business
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Part II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer 
Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers of the Registrant and Corporate Governance
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related 
Stockholder Matters

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

Signatures

Page

1
2
11
17
17
18
18
18

18
21
23
45
47
97
97
98
98
98
98

98
98
98
98
99
103
103

 
 
GLOSSARY OF DEFINITIONS

ASC: Accounting Standards Codification

ASU: Accounting Standards Update

CDD: Cooling Degree-Day

Chesapeake  or  Chesapeake  Utilities:  Chesapeake  Utilities  Corporation,  its  divisions  and  subsidiaries,  as  appropriate  in  the 
context of the disclosure

CHP: Combined Heat and Power Plant 

Company: Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, its divisions and subsidiaries, as appropriate in the context of the disclosure 

Degree-day: A degree-day is the measure of the variation in the weather based on the extent to which the average daily temperature 
(from 10:00 am to 10:00 am) falls above or below 65 degrees Fahrenheit

Delmarva Peninsula: A peninsula on the east coast of the U. S. occupied by Delaware and portions of Maryland and Virginia

Dt(s): Dekatherm(s), which is a natural gas unit of measurement that includes a standard measure for heating value

Dts/d: Dekatherms per day

Eastern Shore: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Utilities

Eight Flags: Eight Flags Energy, LLC, a subsidiary of Chesapeake's OnSight Services, LLC

FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board 

FERC: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

FGT: Florida Gas Transmission Company 

Flo-gas: Flo-gas Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Utilities

FPL: Florida Power & Light Company, an unaffiliated electric company that supplies electricity to FPU

FPU: Florida Public Utilities Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Utilities 

GAAP: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles 

GRIP: Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program

Gross Margin: a non-GAAP measure defined as operating revenues less the cost of sales. The Company's cost of sales includes 
purchased fuel cost for natural gas, electricity and propane and the cost of labor spent on direct revenue-producing activities and 
excludes depreciation, amortization and accretion

Gulfstream: Gulfstream Natural Gas System, LLC, an unaffiliated pipeline network that supplies natural gas to FPU

HDD: Heating Degree Day

MetLife: MetLife Investment Advisors, an institutional debt investment management firm, with which Chesapeake Utilities has 
entered into a Shelf Agreement 

MGP:  Manufactured  gas  plant,  which  is  a  site  where  coal  was  previously  used  to  manufacture  gaseous  fuel  for  industrial, 
commercial and residential use

MTM:  Mark-to-Market (fair value accounting)

MW: Megawatt, which is a unit of measurement for electric base load power or capacity

NYL: New York Life Investors LLC, an institutional debt investment management firm, with which Chesapeake Utilities has 
entered into a Shelf Agreement and issued Shelf Notes

Peninsula Pipeline: Peninsula Pipeline Company, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Utilities 

PESCO: Peninsula Energy Services Company, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Utilities

Prudential:  Prudential  Investment  Management  Inc.,  an  institutional  investment  management  firm,  with  which  Chesapeake 
Utilities has entered into a Shelf Agreement and issued Shelf Notes

PSC: Public Service Commission, which is the state agency that regulates utility rates and/or services in certain of our jurisdictions

Rayonier: Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC, the company that owns the property on which Eight Flags' CHP plant is located 
and a customer of the steam generated by the CHP plant

Revolver: Our unsecured revolving credit facility with certain lenders

Sandpiper: Sandpiper Energy, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Utilities

SEC: Securities and Exchange Commission 

Senior Notes: Our unsecured long-term debt issued primarily to insurance companies on various dates

Sharp: Sharp Energy, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Utilities

Shelf Agreement:  An agreement entered into by Chesapeake Utilities and a counterparty pursuant to which Chesapeake Utilities 
may request that the counterparty purchase our unsecured senior debt with a fixed interest rate and a maturity date not to exceed 
20 years from the date of issuance

Shelf Notes:  Unsecured senior promissory notes issuable under the Shelf Agreement executed with various counterparties  

SICP: 2013 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan

TCJA: Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017

TETLP: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP

U.S.: The United States of America

Xeron: Xeron, Inc., an inactive subsidiary of Chesapeake Utilities

PART I

References in this document to “Chesapeake,” “Chesapeake Utilities,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” mean Chesapeake 
Utilities Corporation, its divisions and/or its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as appropriate in the context of the disclosure.

Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements
We make statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that do not directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. Such statements 
are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. One can typically 
identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words, such as “project,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” 
“intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “continue,” “potential,” “forecast” or other similar words, or future or conditional verbs such as 
“may,” “will,” “should,” “would” or “could.” These statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and 
beliefs about future financial performance, business strategy, projected plans and objectives of the Company. Forward-looking 
statements speak only as of the date they are made or as of the date indicated and we do not undertake any obligation to update 
forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.  These statements are subject to many risks 
and uncertainties. In addition to the risk factors described under Item 1A, Risk Factors, the following important factors, among 
others, could cause actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements: 

• 

• 

• 
• 

• 

• 
• 

• 

• 

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• 
• 
• 

• 

• 

• 
• 

state and federal legislative and regulatory initiatives that affect cost and investment recovery, have an impact on rate 
structures, and affect the speed and the degree to which competition enters the electric and natural gas industries;
the outcomes of regulatory, environmental and legal matters, including whether pending matters are resolved within current 
estimates and whether the related costs are adequately covered by insurance or recoverable in rates; 
the impact of significant changes to current tax regulations and rates;
the timing of certification authorizations associated with new capital projects and the ability to construct facilities at or 
below estimated costs; 
changes in environmental and other laws and regulations to which we are subject and environmental conditions of property 
that we now, or may in the future, own or operate;
possible increased federal, state and local regulation of the safety of our operations;
the economy in our service territories or markets, the nation, and worldwide, including the impact of economic conditions  
(which we do not control ) on demand for electricity, natural gas, propane or other fuels;
risks related to cyber-attacks or cyber-terrorism that could disrupt our business operations or result in failure of information 
technology systems;
the weather and other natural phenomena, including the economic, operational and other effects of hurricanes, ice storms 
and other damaging weather events;
customers' preferred energy sources;
industrial, commercial and residential growth or contraction in our markets or service territories;
the effect of competition on our businesses;
the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices and interest rates;
the effect of spot, forward and future market prices on our various energy businesses;
the extent of our success in connecting natural gas and electric supplies to transmission systems, establishing and maintaining 
key supply sources; and expanding natural gas and electric markets;
the creditworthiness of counterparties with which we are engaged in transactions;
the capital-intensive nature of our regulated energy businesses;
the results of financing efforts, including our ability to obtain financing on favorable terms, which can be affected by 
various factors, including credit ratings and general economic conditions;
the ability to successfully execute, manage and integrate a merger, acquisition or divestiture of assets or businesses and 
the related regulatory or other conditions associated with the merger, acquisition or divestiture;
the impact on our costs and funding obligations, under our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, of potential 
downturns in the financial markets, lower discount rates, and costs associated with health care legislation and regulation;
the ability to continue to hire, train and retain appropriately qualified personnel; and
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by accounting standard-setting bodies.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 1

ITEM 1. Business.

Corporate Overview and Strategy

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation is a Delaware corporation formed in 1947 with operations primarily in the Mid-Atlantic region 
and in Florida, Pennsylvania and Ohio. We are an energy delivery company engaged in the distribution of natural gas, propane 
and electricity; the transmission of natural gas; the generation of electricity and steam, and in providing related services to our 
customers.  

Our strategy is to consistently produce industry leading total shareholder return by profitably investing capital into opportunities 
that leverage our skills and expertise in energy distribution and transmission to achieve high levels of service and growth.  The 
key elements of our strategy include:

• 
• 

• 
• 
• 
• 

capital investment in growth opportunities that generate our target returns;
expanding our energy distribution and transmission operations within our existing service areas as well as into 
new geographic areas; 
providing new services in our current service areas;
expanding our footprint in potential growth markets through strategic acquisitions;
entering new energy markets and businesses that complement our existing operations and growth strategy; and
operating as a customer-centric full-service energy supplier/partner/provider, while providing safe and reliable 
service.

Our employees strive to build meaningful connections that generate opportunities to grow our businesses, develop new markets, 
and enrich the communities in which we live, work and serve. 

Operating Segments

We operate within two reportable segments: Regulated Energy and Unregulated Energy. The remainder of our operations is 
presented as “Other businesses and eliminations." These segments are described below in detail. 

Regulated Energy

Our regulated energy businesses are comprised of natural gas and electric distribution as well as natural gas transmission services. 
The following table presents net income for the year ended December 31, 2018 and total assets as of December 31, 2018, for 
the Regulated Energy segment by operation and area served:

Operations
(in thousands)

Natural Gas Distribution

Areas Served

Net Income

Total Assets

Delmarva Natural Gas (Delaware division, Maryland
division and Sandpiper Energy)
Central Florida Gas and FPU

Delaware/Maryland
Florida

$

$

11,390

11,754

Natural Gas Transmission

Eastern Shore

  Peninsula Pipeline
Electric Distribution

FPU

Total Regulated Energy

Delaware/Maryland/
Pennsylvania

Florida

Florida

17,460

4,303

2,249

$

47,156

$

211,458

312,769

262,918

20,493

123,863

931,501

Revenues in this operating segment are based on rates regulated by the PSC in the states in which we operate or, in the case of 
Eastern Shore, which is an interstate business, by the FERC. The rates are designed to generate revenues to recover all prudent 
operating and financing costs and provide a reasonable return for our stockholders. Each of our distribution and transmission 
operations has a rate base, which generally consists of the original cost of the operation's plant, less accumulated depreciation, 
working capital and other assets. For Delmarva Natural Gas and Eastern Shore, rate base also includes deferred income tax 
liabilities and other additions or deductions. Our Regulated Energy operations in Florida do not include deferred income tax 
liabilities in their rate base.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 2

Our natural gas and electric distribution operations bill customers at standard rates approved by their respective state PSC.  Each 
state PSC allows us to negotiate rates, based on approved methodologies, for large customers that can switch to other fuels. 
Some of our customers in Maryland receive propane through our underground distribution system in Worcester County, which 
we are in the process of converting to natural gas.  We bill these customers under PSC-approved rates and include them in the 
natural gas distribution results and customer statistics.

Our natural gas and electric distribution operations earn profits on the delivery of natural gas or electricity to customers.  The 
cost  of  natural  gas  or  electricity  that  we  deliver  is  passed  through  to  customers  under  PSC-approved  fuel  cost  recovery 
mechanisms.  The mechanisms allow us to adjust our rates on an ongoing basis without filing a rate case to recover changes in 
the cost of the natural gas and electricity that we purchase for customers.  Therefore, while our distribution operating revenues 
fluctuate with the cost of natural gas or electricity we purchase, our distribution margin (which we define as operating revenues 
less purchased gas or electric cost) is generally not impacted by fluctuations in the cost of natural gas or electricity.  

Our natural gas transmission operations bill customers under rate schedules approved by the FERC or at rates negotiated with 
customers. 

Operational Highlights 

The following table presents operating revenues, volumes and the average number of customers by customer class for our natural 
gas and electric distribution operations for the year ended December 31, 2018:

Operating Revenues (in thousands)

  Residential
  Commercial
  Industrial
  Other (1)

Total Operating Revenues

Volumes (in Dts for natural gas/KW Hours for electric)
  Residential
  Commercial
  Industrial
  Other
Total Volumes

Average Number of Customers (3)
  Residential
  Commercial
  Industrial
  Other
Total Average Number of Customers

Delmarva 
Natural Gas 
Distribution

Florida
Natural Gas 
Distribution (2)

FPU
Electric
Distribution

$

70,466
36,916
8,289
928

60% $
32%
7%
1%

35,420
33,229
33,207
4,602

34% $
31%
31%
4%

44,788
39,442
1,543
(5,970)

56 %
49 %
2 %
(7)%

$

116,599

100% $

106,458

100% $

79,803

100 %

4,142,567
3,792,220
5,549,387
80,254
13,564,428

71,322
6,979
157
5
78,463

31%
28%
40%
1%
100%

91%
9%
<1%
<1%
100%

1,762,852
6,441,806
24,759,334
2,338,815
35,302,807

72,151
5,434
2,328
11
79,924

5%
18%
70%
7%
100%

90%
7%
3%
<1%
100%

307,269
302,687
15,160
7,402
632,518

24,686
7,497
2
—
32,185

49 %
48 %
2 %
1 %
100 %

77 %
23 %
<1%
— %
100 %

(1) Operating Revenues from "Other" sources include revenue, unbilled revenue, under (over) recoveries of fuel cost, conservation revenue, other miscellaneous charges, fees for 

billing services provided to third parties, and adjustments for pass-through taxes.

(2) Florida natural gas distribution includes Chesapeake Utilities' Central Florida Gas division, FPU and FPU's Indiantown and Fort Meade divisions.
(3) Average number of customers is based on the twelve-month average for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 3

The following table presents operating revenues, by customer type, for Eastern Shore and Peninsula Pipeline for the year ended 
December 31, 2018, and contracted firm transportation capacity, by customer type, as well as design day capacity at December 31, 
2018:

Operating Revenues (in thousands)
Local distribution companies - affiliated (1)
Local distribution companies - non-affiliated
Commercial and industrial - affiliated
Commercial and industrial - non-affiliated
Other (2)
Total Operating Revenues

Contracted firm transportation capacity (in Dts/d)
Local distribution companies - affiliated
Local distribution companies - non-affiliated
Commercial and industrial - affiliated
Commercial and industrial - non-affiliated
Total Contracted firm transportation capacity

Eastern Shore

Peninsula Pipeline

$

$

19,725
23,975
—
21,748
(1,200)
64,248

31 % $
37 %
— %
34 %
(2)%
100 % $

9,478
840
1,120
490
—
11,928

122,652
76,619
—
95,648
294,919

42 %
26 %
— %
32 %
100 %

143,500
4,825
1,500
5,100
154,925

80%
7%
9%
4%
—%
100%

93%
3%
1%
3%
100%

Design day capacity (in Dts/d)
(1) Eastern Shore's and Peninsula Pipeline's service to our local distribution affiliates is based on the respective regulator's approved rates and is an integral component of the cost 

294,919

154,925

100 %

100%

associated with providing natural gas supplies for those affiliates. We eliminate operating revenues of these entities against the cost of sales of those affiliates in our 
consolidated financial information; however, our local distribution affiliates include this amount in their purchased fuel cost and recover it through fuel cost recovery 
mechanisms.

(2) Operating revenues from "Other" sources are from the rental of gas properties and reserve for rate case refund.

Regulatory Overview

The following table highlights key regulatory information for each of our principal Regulated Energy operations.  The table 
reflects rate increases and rates of return approved prior to the enactment of the TCJA on December 22, 2017.  See Item 8, 
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (Note 19, Rates and Other Regulatory Activities and Note 12, Income Taxes in 
the  consolidated  financial  statements)  for  further  discussion  on  the  impact  of  this  legislation  on  our  regulated  businesses.  
Peninsula Pipeline is not regulated with regard to cost of service by either the Florida PSC or FERC and is therefore excluded 
from the table.

Natural Gas Distribution

Delmarva

Florida

Electric
Distribution

Natural Gas
Transmission

Electric
Distribution

Natural Gas
Transmission

Operation/Division

Delaware

Maryland

Sandpiper

Chesapeake's
Florida
natural gas
division

FPU

FPU

Eastern
Shore

Regulatory Agency

Effective date - Last
Rate Order

Rate Base (in Rates)
Annual Rate Increase
Approved

Capital Structure (in 
rates)(3)*
Allowed Return on
Equity

Delaware 
PSC

Maryland PSC

Maryland 
PSC

Florida PSC

Florida PSC

Florida PSC

FERC

01/01/2017

Not stated

5/1/2018(7)
Not stated

12/01/2018

01/14/2010

Not stated

$46,680,000

01/14/2010(1)
$68,940,000

01/03/2018

08/01/2017

$11,850,000

Not stated

$2,250,000

N/A(7)

N/A(2)

$2,540,000

$7,970,000

$1,560,000

$9,800,000

Not stated

LTD: 42.00% 
STD:   5.00%    
Equity: 53.00%

Not stated

LTD: 30.63%
STD:   6.26%
Equity: 43.49%
Other:  19.62%

LTD: 30.75%
Equity: 46.67%
Other:  22.58%

LTD: 21.91%
STD:   23.50%
Equity: 54.59%

Not stated

9.75% (4)

10.75%(4)

Not Stated (5)

10.80%(4)

10.85%(4)

10.25%(4), (6)

Not Stated

TJCA Refund Status
associated with
customer rates
(1)  The effective date of the order approving the settlement agreement, which adjusted the rates originally approved on June 4, 2009. 

Refunded

Refunded

Reserved

Reserved

Reserved

Reserved

Refunded

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 4

(2)The Maryland PSC approved a declining return on equity that will result in a decline in our rates.
(3)Other components of capital structure include customer deposits, deferred income taxes and tax credits.
(4)  Allowed after-tax return on equity.
(5) The terms of the agreement include revenue neutral rates for the first year (December 1, 2016 through November 30, 2017), followed by a schedule of rate 
reductions in subsequent years based upon the projected rate of propane to natural gas conversions.
(6) The terms of the settlement agreement for the FPU electric division limited proceeding with the Florida PSC prescribed an authorized return on equity 
range of 9.25 to 11.25 percent, with a mid-point of 10.25 percent. The FPU electric division cannot file for a base rate increase prior to December 2019, 
unless its allowed return on equity is below the authorized range and it experiences an unanticipated and unforeseen event that impacts the annual revenue 
requirement in excess of $800,000 within any contiguous four-month period.
(7) The Maryland PSC approved a rate reduction for Maryland division effective May 1, 2018, related to the enactment of the TJCA.
* LTD-Long-term debt; STD-Short-term debt

The following table presents surcharge and other mechanisms that have been approved by the respective PSC for our regulated 
energy distribution businesses. These include Delaware’s surcharge to expand natural gas service in eastern Sussex County; 
Maryland's surcharge to fund natural gas conversions and system improvement in Worcester County; Florida’s GRIP surcharge 
which provides accelerated recovery of the costs of replacing older portions of the natural gas distribution system to improve 
safety and reliability and Florida electric distribution operation's limited proceeding. 

Operation(s)/Division(s)

Delaware division

Maryland division

Sandpiper Energy

FPU and Central Florida Gas natural gas divisions

FPU electric division

Weather

Jurisdiction

Infrastructure
mechanism

Revenue
normalization

Delaware

Maryland

Maryland

Florida

Florida

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

Weather variations directly influence the volume of natural gas and electricity sold and delivered to residential and commercial 
customers for heating and cooling and changes in volumes delivered impact the revenue generated from these customers.  Natural 
gas volumes are highest during the winter months, when residential and commercial customers use more natural gas for heating. 
Demand for electricity is highest during the summer months, when more electricity is used for cooling. We measure the relative 
impact of weather using degree-days.  A degree-day is the measure of the variation in the weather based on the extent to which 
the  average  daily  temperature  falls  above  or  below  65  degrees  Fahrenheit.  Each  degree  of  temperature  below  65  degrees 
Fahrenheit is counted as one heating degree-day, and each degree of temperature above 65 degrees Fahrenheit is counted as one 
cooling degree-day.  Normal heating and cooling degree-days are based on the most recent 10-year average.

Competition

Natural Gas Distribution

While our natural gas distribution operations do not compete directly with other distributors of natural gas for residential and 
commercial customers in our service areas, we do compete with other natural gas suppliers and alternative fuel providers for 
sales to industrial customers.  Large customers could bypass our natural gas distribution systems and connect directly to interstate 
transmission pipelines, and we compete in all aspects of our natural gas business with alternative energy sources, including 
electricity, oil, propane and renewables. The most effective means to compete against alternative fuels are lower prices, superior 
reliability and flexibility of service.  Natural gas historically has maintained a price advantage in the residential, commercial 
and industrial markets, and reliability of natural gas supply and service has been excellent.  In addition, we provide flexible 
pricing to our large customers to minimize fuel switching and protect these volumes and their contributions to the profitability 
of our natural gas distribution operations.   

Natural Gas Transmission

Our natural gas transmission business competes with other pipeline companies to provide service to large industrial, generating 
and distribution customers, primarily in the northern portion of Delmarva and in Florida.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 5

Electric Distribution

While  our  electric  distribution  operations  do  not  compete  directly  with  other  distributors  of  electricity  for  residential  and 
commercial customers in our service areas, we do compete with other electricity suppliers and alternative fuel providers for 
sales to industrial customers.  Some of our large industrial customers may be capable of generating their own electricity, and 
we structure rates, flexibility and service offerings to retain these customers in order to retain their business and contributions 
to the profitability of our electric distribution operations.  

Supplies, Transmission and Storage

Natural Gas Distribution

Our  natural  gas  distribution  operations  purchase  natural  gas  from  marketers  and  producers  and  maintain  contracts  for 
transportation and storage with several interstate pipeline companies to meet projected customer demand requirements.  We 
believe that our supply and capacity strategy will adequately meet our customers’ needs over the next several years.  

The Delmarva natural gas distribution systems are directly connected to Eastern Shore’s pipeline, which has connections to the 
other pipelines that provide us with transportation and storage.  These operations can also use propane-air and liquefied natural 
gas peak-shaving equipment to serve customers. Our Delmarva operations receive a fee, which we share with our customers, 
from our natural gas marketing subsidiary, PESCO, who optimizes the transportation, storage and natural gas supply for these 
operations under a three-year contract.    

We have a contract with an unaffiliated party to supply propane for customers of our Sandpiper system in Maryland who have 
not yet converted to natural gas.   Under the contract, we are committed to purchase approximately 932,000 gallons of propane 
annually at either a fixed per-gallon or a local indexed-index-based price.  The contract expires in May 2019, at which time, we 
can purchase the propane from our propane subsidiary or the external markets directly.

Our Florida natural gas distribution operation uses Peninsula Pipeline and the Peoples Gas System division of Tampa Electric 
Company ("Peoples Gas") to transport natural gas where there is no direct connection with FGT.  

A summary of our pipeline capacity contracts follows:

Division

Delmarva Natural Gas Distribution

Florida Natural Gas Distribution

Pipeline

Eastern Shore
Columbia Gas(1)
Transco(1)
TETLP(1)

Gulfstream(2)
FGT
Peninsula Pipeline

Peoples Gas

Maximum Daily Firm 
Transportation Capacity 
(Dts)

Contract 
Expiration Date

122,652

15,160

27,551

50,000

10,000

41,909 - 73,317
137,500

2,660

2019-2028

2020-2024

2019-2028

2027

2022

2020-2041
2033-2048

2024-2035

(1) Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC ("Transco"), Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC ("Columbia Gas") and Texas Eastern Transmission, LP 
("TETLP") are interstate pipelines interconnected with Eastern Shore's pipeline
(2)  Pursuant to a capacity release program approved by the Florida PSC, all of the capacity under this agreement has been released to various third parties, 
including PESCO. Under the terms of these capacity release agreements, Chesapeake Utilities is contingently liable to Gulfstream should any party, that 
acquired the capacity through release, fail to pay the capacity charge.  

Eastern  Shore  has  three agreements  with Transco  for  a  total  of  7,292  Dts/d  of  firm  daily  storage  injection and  withdrawal 
entitlements and total storage capacity of 288,003 Dts. These agreements expire on various dates between 2019 and 2023. Eastern 
Shore retains these firm storage services in order to provide swing transportation service and firm storage service to customers 
requesting such services. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 6

Electric Distribution

Our Florida electric distribution operation purchases wholesale electricity under the power supply contracts summarized below: 

Counterparty

Area Served by Contract Contracted Amount (MW) Contract Expiration Date

Gulf Power Company

FPL

Eight Flags

Rayonier

WestRock Company

Northwest Florida

Northeast Florida

Northeast Florida

Northeast Florida

Northwest Florida

Full Requirement*

Full Requirement*

21.0

1.7 to 3.0

As-available

*The counter party is obligated to provide us with the electricity to meet our customers’ demand, which may vary.

2019

2024

2036

2036

N/A

Unregulated Energy

The following table presents net income for the year ended December 31, 2018 and total assets as of December 31, 2018, for 
our Unregulated Energy segment by operation and area served:

Operations

Area Served

Net Income

Total Assets

(in thousands)

Propane Operations (Sharp, FPU and Flo-
gas)

Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, 
Pennsylvania, Florida

$

6,443

$

Energy Transmission (Aspire Energy)

Energy Generation (Eight Flags)

Ohio

Florida

Energy Services (PESCO)
Marlin Gas Services (1)
Other

Appalachian Basin, Mid-Atlantic, 
Southeast, Western Pennsylvania

Southeast and Midwest

Other

3,620

1,657

(1,288)
(186)
393

86,989

85,733

10,895

55,021

14,046

2,884

255,568
Total
(1)  In December 2018, Marlin Gas Services, LLC (“Marlin Gas Services”), our newly created subsidiary, acquired the assets of Marlin Gas Transport, Inc. 
("Marlin Gas Transport").  The net loss reported is a result of the costs of consummating the acquisition exceeding the margin generated for approximately 
half of December 2018.

10,639

$

$

Propane Operations 

Our propane operations sell propane to residential, commercial/industrial, wholesale and AutoGas customers, in the Mid-Atlantic 
region, through Sharp Energy, Inc. and Sharpgas, Inc., and in Florida through FPU and Flo-gas. We deliver to and bill our 
propane  customers  based  on  two  primary  customer  types:  bulk  delivery  customers  and  metered  customers.    Bulk  delivery 
customers receive deliveries into tanks at their location.  We invoice and record revenues for these customers at the time of 
delivery. Metered customers are either part of an underground propane distribution system or have a meter installed on the tank 
at their location.  We invoice and recognize revenue for these customers based on their consumption as dictated by scheduled 
meter reads.  As a member of AutoGas Alliance, we install and support propane vehicle conversion systems for vehicle fleets 
and provide onsite fueling infrastructure. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 7

Propane Operations - Operational Highlights

For the year ended December 31, 2018, operating revenues, volumes sold and average number of customers by customer class 
for our Mid-Atlantic and Florida propane operations were as follows:

Operating Revenues (in thousands)

Volumes (in thousands of gallons)

Average Number of Customers (2)

Mid-Atlantic

Florida

Mid-Atlantic

Florida

Mid-Atlantic

Florida

  Residential bulk

$ 27,090

26% $ 6,799

  Residential metered

  Commercial bulk

  Commercial metered

  Wholesale

  AutoGas
  Other (1)
Total

9,933

23,431

—

31,469

4,238

6,160

10%

23%

—%

31%

4%

6%

5,037

5,393

2,127

1,165

—

761

32%

24%

25%

10%

5%

—%

4%

10,483

4,157

14,360

—

28,680

3,104

—

17%

7%

24%

—%

47%

5%

—%

1,547

905

2,550

820

944

—

—

23% 25,870

66% 10,312

13%

38%

12%

14%

—%

—%

9,123

4,201

—

31

85

—

23%

11%

—%

<1%

<1%

—%

6,034

971

280

8

—

—

59%

34%

6%

1%

<1%

—%

—%

$102,321

100% $ 21,282

100%

60,784

100%

6,766

100% 39,310

100% 17,605

100%

(1) Operating revenues from "Other" sources include revenues from customer loyalty programs; delivery, service and appliance fees; and unbilled revenues.
(2) Average number of customers is based on a twelve-month average for the year ended December 31, 2018.    

Competition

Our propane operations compete with national and local independent companies primarily on the basis of price and service.  
Propane is generally a cheaper fuel for home heating than oil and electricity but more expensive than natural gas.  Our propane 
operations are largely concentrated in areas that are not currently served by natural gas distribution systems.

Supplies, Transportation and Storage

We purchase propane from major oil companies and independent natural gas liquids producers.  Propane is transported by truck 
and rail to our bulk storage facilities in Delaware, Maryland, Florida, Pennsylvania and Virginia, which have a total storage 
capacity of 7.1 million gallons. Deliveries are made from these facilities by truck to tanks located on customers’ premises or to 
central  storage  tanks  that  feed  our  underground  propane  distribution  systems. While  propane  supply  has  traditionally  been 
adequate,  significant  fluctuations  in  weather,  closing  of  refineries  and  disruption  in  supply  chains,  could  cause  temporary 
reductions in available supplies.

Weather

Propane revenues are affected by seasonal variations in temperature and weather conditions, which directly influence the volume 
of propane used by our customers.  Our propane revenues are typically highest during the winter months when propane is used 
for heating. Sustained warmer-than-normal temperatures will tend to reduce propane use, while sustained colder-than-normal 
temperatures will tend to increase consumption.

Unregulated Energy Transmission (Aspire Energy)

Aspire Energy owns approximately 2,700 miles of natural gas pipeline systems in 40 counties in Ohio. The majority of Aspire 
Energy’s revenues are derived from long-term supply agreements with Columbia Gas of Ohio and Consumers Gas Cooperative 
("CGC"), which together serve more than 21,000 end-use customers. Aspire Energy purchases natural gas to serve these customers 
from conventional producers in the Marcellus and Utica natural gas production areas.  In addition, Aspire Energy earns revenue 
by gathering and processing natural gas for customers.  

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 8

For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2018, Aspire Energy's operating revenues and deliveries by customer type 
were as follows:

Supply to Columbia Gas of Ohio

Supply to CGC

Supply to Marketers - affiliated

Supply to Marketers - unaffiliated

Other (including natural gas gathering and processing)

Operating revenues
(in thousands) % of Total
$

13,429

38%

12,530

2,654

3,918

2,876

35%

8%

11%

8%

Total

$

35,407

100%

Energy Generation (Eight Flags) 

Deliveries

(in thousands Dts)

 % of Total

2,538

1,611

1,013

1,328

141

6,631

38%

25%

15%

20%

2%

100%

Eight Flags generates electricity and steam at its CHP plant located on Amelia Island, Florida. The plant is powered by natural 
gas transported by Peninsula Pipeline and our Florida natural gas distribution operation and produces approximately 21 MW of 
electricity and 75,000 pounds per hour of steam.  Eight Flags sells the electricity generated from the plant to our Florida electric 
distribution operation and sells the steam to the customer who owns the site on which the plant is located both under separate 
20-year contracts.  

Energy Services (PESCO)

PESCO competes with utilities and third-party marketers to sell natural gas and related services directly to commercial and 
industrial  customers.  PESCO  delivers  the  natural  gas  it  sells  to  customers  through  affiliated  and  non-affiliated  natural  gas 
distribution systems and pipelines and bills customers directly or through the billing services of the natural gas distribution 
utility that delivers the gas to PESCO’s customer. PESCO manages a portion of the natural gas transportation and storage capacity 
for our Delmarva natural gas distribution operations under three-year asset management agreements that expire on March 31, 
2020.  

The following table summarizes PESCO's operating revenues by region in 2018:

Appalachian Basin

Mid-Atlantic

Southeast 
Western Pennsylvania

Total

Marlin Gas Services

Operating Revenues

(in thousands)

% of Total

$

$

34,713

127,148

59,077
37,775

258,713

13%

49%

23%
15%

100%

In December 2018, Marlin Gas Services, our newly created subsidiary, acquired certain operating assets of Marlin Gas Transport, 
a supplier of mobile compressed natural gas utility and pipeline solutions.  Marlin Gas Services provides a temporary solution 
for gas pipeline and gas distribution systems while safety and integrity work is being performed.  The assets purchased have 
the capacity to transport more than 7 billion cubic feet of natural gas annually using one of the largest fleets of tube trailers 
dedicated to the transportation of compressed natural gas (“CNG”).  The acquisition will allow us to offer solutions to address 
supply interruption scenarios and provide other unique applications where pipeline supplies are not available or cannot meet 
customer  requirements.  Operating  revenues  and  net  income  generated  from  the  date  of  acquisition  through  the  year  ended 
December 31, 2018 were immaterial.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 9

 
Other Businesses and Eliminations

Other businesses and eliminations consists primarily of subsidiaries that own real estate leased to affiliates, eliminations of inter-
segment  revenue  and  corporate  costs  which  are  not  directly  attributable  to  a  specific  business  unit.  See  Item  8,  Financial 
Statements  and  Supplementary  Data  (Note  6,  Segment  Information,  in  the  consolidated  financial  statements)  for  more 
information.

Environmental Matters

See Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (see Note 20, Environmental Commitments and Contingencies, in 
the consolidated financial statements).

Employees

As of December 31, 2018, we had a total of 983 employees, 119 of whom are union employees represented by two labor unions: 
the  International  Brotherhood  of  Electrical Workers  and  the  United  Food  and  Commercial Workers  Union. The  collective 
bargaining agreements with these labor unions expire in 2019.

Executive Officers 

Set forth below are the names, ages, and positions of our executive officers with their recent business experience. The age of 
each officer is as of the filing date of this report.

Name
Jeffry M. Householder

Age
61

Officer
Since
2010

Beth W. Cooper

52

2005

James F. Moriarty

61

2015

Stephen C. Thompson

58

1997

Offices Held During the Past Five Years
President (January 1, 2019 - present)
Chief Executive Officer (January 1, 2019 - present)
Director (January 1, 2019 - present)
President of FPU (June 2010 - February 26, 2019)

Executive Vice President (Beginning February 26, 2019)
Chief Financial Officer (September 2008 - present) 
Senior Vice President (September 2008 - February 26, 2019)
Assistant Corporate Secretary (March 2015 - present)                                                             
Corporate Secretary (June 2005 - March 2015)

Executive Vice President (Beginning February 26, 2019)                         
General Counsel & Corporate Secretary (March 2015 - present)                                  
Chief Policy and Risk Officer (Beginning February 26, 2019) 
Senior Vice President (February 2017 - February 26, 2019)                          
Vice President (March 2015 - February 2017) 

Senior Vice President (September 2004 - present)
President, Eastern Shore (January 1997 - present)                                                  
President and Chief Operating Officer, Sandpiper (May 2014 - 
present)
Vice President (May 1997 - September 2004)

Available Information on Corporate Governance Documents

Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other reports and 
amendments to these reports that we file with or furnish to the SEC are available free of charge at our website, www.chpk.com, 
as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these reports with, or furnish these reports to the SEC. The content 
of this website is not part of this report. 

In addition, the following documents are available free of charge on our website, www.chpk.com: 

•  Business Code of Ethics and Conduct applicable to all employees, officers and directors; 
•  Code of Ethics for Financial Officers;
•  Corporate Governance Guidelines;
•  Charters  for  the Audit  Committee,  Compensation  Committee,  Investment  Committee,  and  Corporate  Governance 

Committee of the Board of Directors; and

•  Corporate Governance Guidelines on Director Independence.

Any of these reports or documents may also be obtained by writing to: Corporate Secretary; c/o Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, 
909 Silver Lake Boulevard, Dover, DE 19904.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 10

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

The following is a discussion of the primary factors that may affect the operations and/or financial performance of our regulated 
and unregulated energy businesses. Refer to the section entitled Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial 
Condition and Results of Operations of this report for an additional discussion of these and other related factors that affect our 
operations and/or financial performance.

FINANCIAL RISKS

Instability and volatility in the financial markets could negatively impact access to capital at competitive rates, which could 
affect our ability to implement our strategic plan, undertake improvements and make other investments required for our future 
growth.

Our  business  strategy  includes  the  continued  pursuit  of  growth  and  requires  capital  investment  in  excess  of  cash  flow  from 
operations.   As a result, the successful execution of our strategy is dependent upon access to equity and debt at reasonable costs.  
Our ability to issue new debt and equity capital and the cost of equity and debt are greatly affected by our financial performance 
and the conditions of the financial markets.  In addition, our ability to obtain adequate and cost-effective debt depends on our 
credit ratings.   A downgrade in our current credit ratings could negatively impact our access to and cost of debt.   If we are not 
able to access capital at competitive rates, our ability to implement our strategic plan, undertake improvements and make other 
investments required for our future growth may be limited.

PESCO  is  exposed  to  market  risks  beyond  our  control,  which  could  adversely  affect  our  financial  results  and  capital 
requirements.

PESCO is subject to market risks beyond our control, including market liquidity and commodity price volatility. Although we 
maintain a risk management policy, we may not be able to offset completely the price risk associated with volatile commodity 
prices, which could lead to volatility in earnings. Physical trading also has price risk on any net open positions at the end of each 
trading day, as well as volatility resulting from (i) intra-day fluctuations of natural gas prices, and (ii) daily price movements 
between the time natural gas is purchased or sold for future delivery and the time the related purchase or sale is economically 
hedged. The determination of our net open position at the end of any trading day requires us to make assumptions as to future 
circumstances, including the use of natural gas by our customers in relation to anticipated market positions. Because the price risk 
associated with any net open position at the end of such day may increase if the assumptions are not realized, we review these 
assumptions daily. Net open positions may increase volatility in our financial condition or results of operations if market prices 
move in a significantly favorable or unfavorable manner, because the changes in fair value of trading contracts are immediately 
recognized as profits or losses for financial accounting purposes. This volatility may occur, with a resulting increase or decrease 
in  earnings  or  losses,  even  though  the  expected  profit  margin  is  essentially  unchanged  from  the  date  the  transactions  were 
consummated.

PESCO is exposed to the credit risk of its counterparties.

PESCO extends credit to counterparties and continually monitors and manages collections aggressively. There is risk that PESCO 
may not be able to collect amounts owed to it. If the counterparty to such a transaction fails to perform, and any underlying 
collateral is inadequate, we could experience financial losses, which would negatively impact our results of operations.

PESCO is dependent upon the availability of credit to successfully operate its business.

PESCO depends upon credit to buy natural gas for resale or to trade. If financial market conditions or the financial condition of 
our Company declines, then the cost of credit could increase or become unavailable, which might adversely affect our results of 
operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Fluctuations in propane gas prices could negatively affect results of operations.

We adjust the price of the propane we sell based on changes in our cost of purchasing propane. However, if the market does not 
allow us to increase propane sales prices to compensate fully for fluctuations in purchased gas costs, our results of operations 
and earnings could be negatively affected.

If we fail to comply with our debt covenant obligations, we could experience adverse financial consequences that could affect 
our liquidity and ability to borrow funds.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 11

Our long-term debt obligations, term loans, the Revolver and our committed short-term lines of credit contain financial covenants 
related to debt-to-capital ratios and interest-coverage ratios. Failure to comply with any of these covenants could result in an 
event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of outstanding debt obligations or the inability to 
borrow under certain credit agreements. Any such acceleration could cause a material adverse change in our financial condition.

Increases in interest rates may adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.

Increases in interest rates could increase the cost of future debt issuances. Absent recovery of the higher debt cost in the rates we 
charge our utility customers, our earnings could be adversely affected. Increases in short-term interest rates could negatively affect 
our results of operations, which depend on short-term lines of credit to finance accounts receivable and storage gas inventories 
and to temporarily finance capital expenditures. Reference should be made to Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures 
about Market Risk for additional information.

Current market conditions could adversely impact the return on plan assets for our pension plans, which may require significant 
additional funding.

Our pension plans are closed to new employees, and the future benefits are frozen. The costs of providing benefits and related 
funding requirements of these plans are subject to changes in the market value of the assets that fund the plans and the discount 
rates used to estimate the pension benefit obligations. The funded status of the plans and the related costs reflected in our financial 
statements are affected by various factors that are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty, particularly in the current economic 
environment. Future losses of asset values and further declines in discount rates may necessitate accelerated funding of the plans 
to meet minimum federal government requirements and may result in higher pension expense in future years. Adverse changes 
in the benefit obligations of our pension plans may require us to record higher pension expense and fund obligations earlier than 
originally planned, which would have an adverse impact on our cash flows from operations, decrease borrowing capacity and 
increase interest expense.

OPERATIONAL RISKS

We are dependent upon construction of new facilities to support future growth in earnings in our natural gas and electric 
distribution and natural gas transmission operations.

Construction of new facilities required to support future growth is subject to various regulatory and developmental risks, including 
but  not  limited  to:  (i) our  ability  to  obtain  timely  certificate  authorizations,  necessary  approvals  and  permits  from  regulatory 
agencies and on terms that are acceptable to us; (ii) potential changes in federal, state and local statutes and regulations, including 
environmental requirements, that prevent a project from proceeding or increase the anticipated cost of the project; (iii) our inability 
to acquire rights-of-way or land rights on a timely basis on terms that are acceptable to us; (iv) lack of anticipated future growth 
in available natural gas and electricity supply; (v) insufficient customer throughput commitments; and (vi) lack of available and 
qualified third-party contractors which could impact the timely construction of new facilities.

We operate in a competitive environment, and we may lose customers to competitors.

Natural Gas. Our natural gas transmission and distribution operations compete with interstate pipelines when our customers are 
located  close  enough  to  a  competing  pipeline  to  make  direct  connections  economically  feasible.  Our  natural  gas  marketing 
operations compete with third-party suppliers to sell natural gas to commercial and industrial customers.  Customers also have 
the option to switch to alternative fuels, including renewable energy sources.  Failure to retain and grow our natural gas customer 
base would have an adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

Electric. Our Florida electric distribution business has remained substantially free from direct competition from other electric 
service  providers  but  does  face  competition  from  other  energy  sources.  Changes  in  the  competitive  environment  caused  by 
legislation, regulation, market conditions, or initiatives of other electric power providers, particularly with respect to retail electric 
competition, could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Propane. Our propane operations compete with other propane distributors, primarily on the basis of service and price. Some of 
our  competitors  have  significantly  greater  resources.  Our  ability  to  grow  the  propane  operations  business  is  contingent  upon 
capturing additional market share, expanding into new markets, and successfully utilizing pricing programs that retain and grow 
our customer base. Failure to retain and grow our customer base in our propane operations would have an adverse effect on our 
results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 12

Fluctuations in weather may cause a significant variance in our earnings.

Our natural gas distribution, propane operations and natural gas transmission operations, are sensitive to fluctuations in weather 
conditions, which directly influence the volume of natural gas and propane we transport, sell and deliver to our customers. A 
significant portion of our natural gas distribution, propane operations and natural gas transmission revenue is derived from the 
sales  and  deliveries  to  residential,  commercial  and  industrial  heating  customers  during  the  five-month  peak  heating  season 
(November  through  March).  Other  than  our  Maryland  division  and  Sandpiper  Energy  which  have  revenue  normalization 
mechanisms, if the weather is warmer than normal, we sell and deliver less natural gas and propane to customers, and earn less 
revenue, which could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Likewise, if the weather is 
colder than normal, we sell and deliver more natural gas and propane to customers, and earn more revenue, which could positively 
affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.  Variations in weather from year to year can cause our results 
of operations, cash flows and financial condition to vary accordingly.  

Our electric distribution operation is also affected by variations in weather conditions generally and unusually severe weather 
conditions. However, electricity consumption is generally less seasonal than natural gas and propane because it is used for both 
heating and cooling in our service areas.

Natural disasters, severe weather (such as a major hurricane) and acts of terrorism could adversely impact earnings.

Inherent in energy transmission and distribution activities are a variety of hazards and operational risks, such as leaks, ruptures, 
fires, explosions, sabotage and mechanical problems. Natural disasters and severe weather may damage our assets, cause operational 
interruptions and result in the loss of human life, all of which could negatively affect our earnings, financial condition and results 
of operations. Acts of terrorism and the impact of retaliatory military and other action by the United States and its allies may lead 
to increased political, economic and financial market instability and volatility in the price of natural gas, electricity and propane 
that could negatively affect our operations. Companies in the energy industry may face a heightened risk of exposure to acts of 
terrorism, which could affect our earnings, financial condition and results of operations. The insurance industry may also be 
affected by natural disasters, severe weather and acts of terrorism; as a result, the availability of insurance covering risks against 
which we and our competitors typically insure may be limited. In addition, the insurance we are able to obtain may have higher 
deductibles, higher premiums and more restrictive policy terms, which could adversely affect our results of operations, financial 
condition and cash flows.

Operating events affecting public safety and the reliability of our natural gas and electric distribution and transmission systems 
could adversely affect our operations and increase our costs.

Our natural gas and electric operations are exposed to operational events and risks, such as major leaks, outages, mechanical 
failures and breakdown, operations below the expected level of performance or efficiency, and accidents that could affect public 
safety and the reliability of our distribution and transmission systems, significantly increase costs and cause loss of customer 
confidence. If we are unable to recover all or some of these costs from insurance and/or customers through the regulatory process, 
our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.

A security breach disrupting our operating systems and facilities or exposing confidential information may adversely affect 
our reputation, disrupt our operations and increase our costs.

Security breaches of our information technology infrastructure, including cyber-attacks and cyber-terrorism, could lead to system 
disruptions or cause facility shutdowns. If such an attack or security breach were to occur, our business, our earnings, results of 
operation and financial condition could be adversely affected. In addition, the protection of customer, employee and Company 
data  is  crucial  to  our  operational  security. A  breach  or  breakdown  of  our  systems  that  results  in  the  unauthorized  release  of 
individually identifiable customer or other sensitive data could have an adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations and 
financial  condition  and  could  also  materially  increase  our  costs  of  maintaining  our  system  and  protecting  it  against  future 
breakdowns or breaches. We take reasonable precautions to safeguard our information systems from cyber-attacks and security 
breaches; however, there is no guarantee that the procedures implemented to protect against unauthorized access to our information 
systems are adequate to safeguard against all attacks and breaches.

Failure to attract and retain an appropriately qualified employee workforce could adversely affect operations.

Our ability to implement our business strategy and serve our customers depends upon our continuing ability to attract, develop 
and retain talented professionals and a technically skilled workforce, and transfer the knowledge and expertise of our workforce 
to new employees as our existing employees retire. Failure to hire and adequately train replacement employees, including the 
transfer of significant internal historical knowledge and expertise to new employees, or the future availability and cost of contract 
labor could adversely affect our ability to manage and operate our business. If we were unable to hire, train and retain appropriately 
qualified personnel, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 13

A strike, work stoppage or a labor dispute could adversely affect our operations.

We are party to collective bargaining agreements with labor unions at some of our Florida operations. A strike, work stoppage or 
a labor dispute with a union or employees represented by a union could cause interruption to our operations and our results could 
be adversely affected.

Our businesses are capital-intensive, and the increased costs and/or delays of capital projects may adversely affect our future 
earnings.

Our businesses are capital-intensive and require significant investments in ongoing infrastructure projects. Our ability to complete 
our infrastructure projects on a timely basis and manage the overall cost of those projects may be affected by the availability of 
the necessary materials and qualified vendors. Our future earnings could be adversely affected if we are unable to manage such 
capital projects effectively, or if full recovery of such capital costs is not permitted in future regulatory proceedings.

Our regulated energy business may be at risk if franchise agreements are not renewed, or new franchise agreements are not 
obtained, which could adversely affect our future results or operating cash flows and financial condition.

Our regulated natural gas and electric distribution operations hold franchises in each of the incorporated municipalities that require 
franchise agreements in order to provide natural gas and electricity.  Ongoing financial results would be adversely impacted in 
the event that franchise agreements were not renewed. If we are unable to obtain franchise agreements for new service areas, 
growth in our future earnings could be negatively impacted.

Slowdowns in customer growth may adversely affect earnings and cash flows.

Our ability to increase gross margins in our natural gas, propane and electric distribution businesses is dependent upon growth in 
the residential construction market, adding new commercial and industrial customers and conversion of customers to natural gas, 
electricity or propane from other energy sources. Slowdowns in growth may adversely affect our gross margin, earnings and cash 
flows.

Energy conservation could lower energy consumption, which would adversely affect our earnings.

Federal  and  state  legislative  and  regulatory  initiatives  to  promote  energy  efficiency  and  conservation  could  lower  energy 
consumption by our customers.  In addition, higher costs of natural gas, propane and electricity may cause customers to conserve 
fuel.  To the extent a PSC or FERC does not allow the recovery through customer rates of the costs or lower consumption from 
energy efficiency or conservation, and our propane margins cannot be increased due to market conditions, our results of operations, 
cash flows and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Commodity price increases may adversely affect the operating costs and competitive positions of our natural gas, electric and 
propane operations, which may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Natural Gas/Electricity. Higher natural gas prices can significantly increase the cost of gas billed to our natural gas customers. 
Increases in the cost of natural gas and other fuels used to generate electricity can significantly increase the cost of electricity 
billed to our electric customers. Damage to the production or transportation facilities of our suppliers, which decreases their supply 
of natural gas and electricity, could result in increased supply costs and higher prices for our customers. Such cost increases 
generally have no immediate effect on our revenues and net income because of our regulated fuel cost recovery mechanisms. 
However, our net income may be reduced by higher expenses that we may incur for uncollectible customer accounts and by lower 
volumes of natural gas and electricity deliveries when customers reduce their consumption. Therefore, increases in the price of 
natural gas and other fuels can adversely affect our operating cash flows, results of operations and financial condition, as well as 
the competitiveness of natural gas and electricity as energy sources.

Propane. Propane costs are subject to changes as a result of product supply or other market conditions, including weather, economic 
and political factors affecting crude oil and natural gas supply or pricing. For example, weather conditions could damage production 
or transportation facilities, which could result in decreased supplies of propane, increased supply costs and higher prices for 
customers. Such increases in costs can occur rapidly and can negatively affect profitability. There is no assurance that we will be 
able to pass on propane cost increases fully or immediately, particularly when propane costs increase rapidly. Therefore, average 
retail sales prices can vary significantly from year-to-year as product costs fluctuate in response to propane, fuel oil, crude oil and 
natural gas commodity market conditions. In addition, in periods of sustained higher commodity prices, declines in retail sales 
volumes due to reduced consumption and increased amounts of uncollectible accounts may adversely affect net income.

Refer to Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for additional information.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 14

A  substantial  disruption  or  lack  of  growth  in  interstate  natural  gas  pipeline  transmission  and  storage  capacity  or  electric 
transmission capacity may impair our ability to meet customers’ existing and future requirements.

In order to meet existing and future customer demands for natural gas and electricity, we must acquire sufficient supplies of natural 
gas  and  electricity,  interstate  pipeline  transmission  and  storage  capacity,  and  electric  transmission  capacity  to  serve  such 
requirements. We  must  contract  for  reliable  and  adequate  upstream  transmission  capacity  for  our  distribution  systems  while 
considering the dynamics of the interstate pipeline and storage and electric transmission markets, our own on-system resources, 
as well as the characteristics of our markets. Our financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely 
affected if the future availability of these capacities were insufficient to meet future customer demands for natural gas and electricity. 
Currently, our Florida natural gas operation relies primarily on one pipeline system, FGT, for most of its natural gas supply and 
transmission. Our Florida electric operation secures electricity from external parties. Any continued interruption of service from 
these suppliers could adversely affect our ability to meet the demands of our customers, which could negatively impact our earnings, 
financial condition and results of operations.

Our use of derivative instruments may adversely affect our results of operations.

Fluctuating  commodity  prices  may  affect  our  earnings  and  financing  costs  because  our  propane  operations  and  PESCO  use 
derivative instruments, including forwards, futures, swaps, puts, and calls, to hedge price risk. While we have risk management 
policies and operating procedures in place to control our exposure to risk, if we purchase derivative instruments that are not 
properly matched to our exposure, our results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition may be adversely affected.

PESCO's earnings and operating cash flows are dependent upon optimization of physical assets.

PESCO’s earnings and cash flows are based, in part, on its ability to optimize its portfolio of contractual rights to utilize natural 
gas storage and pipeline assets.  The optimization strategy involves utilizing its physical assets to take advantage of differences 
in natural gas prices between geographic locations and/or time periods.  Any change among various pricing points could affect 
those differentials.  In addition, significant increases in the supply of natural gas for PESCO's market areas can reduce its ability 
to take advantage of pricing fluctuations in the future.  Changes in pricing dynamics and supply could have an adverse impact on 
its optimization activities, earnings and cash flows.  PESCO incurs fixed demand fees to acquire its contractual rights to storage 
and transportation assets. Should commodity prices at various locations or time periods change in such a way that PESCO is not 
able to recoup these costs from customers, the cash flows and earnings of PESCO and ultimately, the Company, could be adversely 
impacted.

REGULATORY, LEGAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS

Regulation of our businesses, including changes in the regulatory environment, may adversely affect our results of operations, 
cash flows and financial condition.

The Delaware, Maryland and Florida PSCs regulate our utility operations in those states. Eastern Shore is regulated by the FERC. 
The PSCs and the FERC set the rates that we can charge customers for services subject to their regulatory jurisdiction. Our ability 
to obtain timely future rate increases and rate supplements to maintain current rates of return depends on regulatory approvals, 
and there can be no assurance that our regulated operations will be able to obtain such approvals or maintain currently authorized 
rates of return. When earnings from our regulated utilities exceed the authorized rate of return, the respective regulatory authority 
may require us to reduce our rates charged to customers in the future.

We may face certain regulatory and financial risks related to pipeline safety legislation.

We are subject to a number of legislative proposals at the federal and state level to implement increased oversight over natural 
gas pipeline operations and facilities to inspect pipeline facilities, upgrade pipeline facilities, or control the impact of a breach of 
such facilities. Additional operating expenses and capital expenditures may be necessary to remain in compliance. If new legislation 
is adopted and we incur additional expenses and expenditures, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could 
be adversely affected, particularly if we are not authorized through the regulatory process to recover from customers some or all 
of these costs and our authorized rate of return.

We are subject to operating and litigation risks that may not be fully covered by insurance.

Our operations are subject to the operating hazards and risks normally incidental to handling, storing, transporting, transmitting 
and delivering natural gas, electricity and propane to end users. From time to time, we are a defendant in legal proceedings arising 
in the ordinary course of business. We maintain insurance coverage for our general liabilities in the amount of $51 million, which 
we believe is reasonable and prudent. However, there can be no assurance that such insurance will be adequate to protect us from 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 15

all material expenses related to potential future claims for personal injury and property damage or that such levels of insurance 
will be available in the future at economical prices.

Costs of compliance with environmental laws may be significant.

We  are  subject  to  federal,  state  and  local  laws  and  regulations  governing  environmental  quality  and  pollution  control. These 
evolving laws and regulations may require expenditures over a long period of time to control environmental effects at our current 
and former operating sites, especially former MGP sites. To date, we have been able to recover, through regulatory rate mechanisms, 
the costs associated with the remediation of former MGP sites. However, there is no guarantee that we will be able to recover 
future remediation costs in the same manner or at all. A change in our approved rate mechanisms for recovery of environmental 
remediation costs at former MGP sites could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Further, existing environmental laws and regulations may be revised, or new laws and regulations seeking to protect the environment 
may be adopted and be applicable to us. Revised or additional laws and regulations could result in additional operating restrictions 
on our facilities or increased compliance costs, which may not be fully recoverable. Any such increase in compliance costs could 
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Compliance with these legal obligations requires us to commit 
capital. If we fail to comply with environmental laws and regulations, even if such failure is caused by factors beyond our control, 
we may be assessed civil or criminal penalties and fines, which could impact our financial condition and results of operations.  
See Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (see Note 20, Environmental Commitments and Contingencies, in the 
consolidated financial statements).

Unanticipated changes in our tax provisions or exposure to additional tax liabilities could affect our profitability and cash 
flow.

We are subject to income and other taxes in the U.S. Changes in applicable U.S. tax laws and regulations, or their interpretation 
and application, including the possibility of retroactive effect, could affect our tax expense and profitability. In addition, the final 
determination of any tax audits or related litigation could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions and 
accruals. Changes in our tax provision or an increase in our tax liabilities, due to changes in applicable law and regulations, the 
interpretation or application thereof, future changes in the tax rate or a final determination of tax audits or litigation, could have 
a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Our business may be subject in the future to additional regulatory and financial risks associated with global warming and 
climate change.

There have been a number of federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives proposed in recent years in an attempt to control 
or limit the effects of global warming and overall climate change, including greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide.  
The direction of future U.S. climate change regulation is difficult to predict given the potential for policy changes under different 
Presidential administrations and Congressional leadership.  The EPA may or may not continue developing regulations to reduce 
greenhouse gas emissions.  Even if federal efforts in this area slow, states may continue pursuing climate regulations.  Any laws 
or regulations that may be adopted to restrict or reduce emissions of greenhouse gases could require us to incur additional operating 
costs, such as costs to purchase and operate emissions controls, to obtain emission allowances or to pay emission taxes, and reduce 
demand for our products.   Federal or state legislative initiatives to implement renewable portfolio standards or to further subsidize 
the cost of solar, wind and other renewable power sources may change the demand for natural gas.  We cannot predict the potential 
impact that such laws or regulations, if adopted, may have on our future business, financial condition or financial results.

Climate changes may impact the demand for our services in the future and could result in more frequent and more severe 
weather events, which ultimately could adversely affect our financial results.

Significant climatic change creates physical and financial risks for us.  Our customers' energy needs vary with weather conditions, 
primarily temperature and humidity.  For residential customers, heating and cooling represent their largest energy use.  To the 
extent weather conditions may be affected by climate change, customers' energy use could increase or decrease depending on the 
duration and magnitude of any changes.  Changes in energy use due to weather variations may affect our financial condition 
through volatility and/or decreased revenues and cash flows.  Extreme weather conditions require more system backups and can 
increase costs and system stresses, including service interruptions.  Severe weather impacts our operating territories primarily 
through thunderstorms, tornadoes, hurricanes, and snow or ice storms.  Weather conditions outside of our operating territories 
could also have an impact on our revenues and cash flows by affecting natural gas prices.  To the extent the frequency of extreme 
weather events increases, this could increase our costs of providing services.  We may not be able to pass on the higher costs to 
our customers or recover all the costs related to mitigating these physical risks.  To the extent financial markets view climate 
change and emissions of greenhouse gases as a financial risk, this could adversely affect our ability to access capital markets or 
cause us to receive less favorable terms and conditions in future financings.  Our business could be affected by the potential for 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 16

lawsuits related to or against greenhouse gas emitters based on the claimed connection between greenhouse gas emissions and 
climate change, which could impact adversely our business, results of operations and cash flows.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may delay or prevent a transaction that stockholders would view as favorable.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as Delaware law, contain provisions that could delay, defer or prevent an 
unsolicited change in control of Chesapeake Utilities, which may negatively affect the market price of our common stock or the 
ability of stockholders to participate in a transaction in which they might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over the 
then current market price. These provisions may also prevent changes in management. In addition, our Board of Directors is 
authorized to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval on such terms as our Board of Directors may determine. Our 
common stockholders will be subject to, and may be negatively affected by, the rights of any preferred stock that may be issued 
in the future.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2. Properties.

Offices and other operational facilities

We own or lease offices and other operational facilities in the following locations: Anne Arundel, Cecil, Dorchester, Somerset,  
Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester Counties, Maryland; Kent, New Castle and Sussex Counties, Delaware; Accomack County, 
Virginia; Alachua, Brevard, Broward, Hendry, Jackson, Levy, Martin, Nassau, Okeechobee, Palm Beach, Polk and Volusia Counties, 
Florida; Orrville and Athens, Ohio; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Regulated Energy Segment

We own approximately 1,594 miles of natural gas distribution mains (together with related service lines, meters and regulators) 
in Kent, New Castle and Sussex Counties, Delaware; and Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Wicomico and Worcester Counties, Maryland. 
We own approximately 2,862 miles of natural gas distribution mains (and related equipment) in Brevard, Broward, Citrus, Clay, 
DeSoto, Escambia, Gadsden, Gilchrist, Hernando, Hillsborough, Holmes, Indian River, Jackson, Liberty, Marion, Martin, Nassau, 
Okeechobee, Osceola, Palm Beach, Polk, Seminole, Suwannee, Union, Volusia and Washington Counties, Florida. In addition, 
we have adequate gate stations to handle receipt of the gas into each of the distribution systems. We also own approximately 97
miles of underground propane distribution mains in Worcester County, Maryland and facilities in Delaware and Maryland, which 
we use for propane-air injection during periods of peak demand.  

We own and operate approximately 486 miles of natural gas transmission pipeline, extending from interconnects at Daleville, 
Honey  Brook  and  Parkesburg,  Pennsylvania;  and  Hockessin,  Delaware,  to  96  delivery  points  in  southeastern  Pennsylvania, 
Delaware and the eastern shore of Maryland and approximately 86 miles of natural gas transmission pipeline in Escambia, Indian 
River, Palm Beach, Pensacola, Polk, Suwannee and Volusia Counties, Florida. We also own approximately 45 percent of the 16-
mile natural gas pipeline extending from the Duval/Nassau County line to Amelia Island in Nassau County, Florida. The remaining 
55 percent of the natural gas pipeline is owned by Peoples Gas.

We own and operate approximately 16 miles of electric transmission line located in Nassau County, Florida and approximately 
905 miles of electric distribution line in Calhoun, Jackson, Liberty and Nassau Counties, Florida.

Unregulated Energy Segment

We own bulk propane storage facilities, with an aggregate capacity of approximately 7.1 million gallons, in Delaware, Maryland, 
Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Florida.  These facilities are located on real estate that is either owned or leased by us.

We own approximately 204 miles of underground propane distribution mains in Delaware; Dorchester, Princess Anne, Queen 
Anne's,  Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico  and Worcester  Counties,  Maryland;  Chester  and  Delaware  Counties,  Pennsylvania;  and 
Alachua, Brevard, Broward, Citrus, Duval, Hillsborough, Marion, Nassau, Orange, Palm Beach, Polk, Seminole, St. Johns and 
Volusia Counties, Florida.

We own 16 natural gas gathering systems and approximately 2,700 miles of pipeline in central and eastern Ohio. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 17

Florida liens

All of the assets owned by FPU are subject to a lien in favor of the holders of its first mortgage bond securing its indebtedness 
under its Mortgage Indenture and Deed of Trust. These assets are not subject to any other lien as all other debt is unsecured. FPU 
owns offices and facilities in the following locations: Alachua, Brevard, Broward, Citrus, Hendry, Jackson, Nassau, Okeechobee, 
Palm Beach and Volusia Counties, Florida. The FPU assets subject to the lien also include: 1,980 miles of natural gas distribution 
mains (and related equipment) in its service areas; 16 miles of electric transmission line located in Nassau County, Florida; 905
miles of electric distribution line located in Calhoun, Jackson, Liberty and Nassau Counties in Florida; propane storage facilities 
with a total capacity of 1.1 million gallons, located in south, central and north Florida; and 76 miles of underground propane 
distribution mains in  Alachua, Brevard, Broward, Citrus, Duval, Hillsborough, Indian River, Marion, Martin, Nassau, Orange, 
Palm Beach, Polk, Seminole, St. Johns and Volusia Counties, Florida.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings.

See Note 21, Other Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated into Item 
3 by reference.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity 
Securities.

Common Stock Dividends and Stockholder Information:

Chesapeake Utilities common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the ticker symbol CPK.  As of 
February 15, 2019, we had 2,253 holders of record of our common stock. We declared quarterly cash dividends on our common 
stock totaling $1.4350 per share in 2018 and $1.2800 per share in 2017, and have paid a cash dividend to our common stock 
stockholders for 58 consecutive years.  Future dividend payments and amounts are at the discretion of our Board of Directors and 
will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, and other factors. 

Indentures to our long-term debt contain various restrictions which limit our ability to pay dividends.  FPU’s first mortgage bonds, 
which are due in 2022, contain a similar restriction that limits the payment of dividends by FPU.  Refer to Item 8, Financial 
Statements  and  Supplementary  Data  (see  Note  13,  Long-Term  Debt,  in  the  consolidated  financial  statements)  for  additional 
information.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 18

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer

The following table sets forth information on purchases by us or on our behalf of shares of our common stock during the quarter 
ended December 31, 2018.

Period

October 1, 2018 through October 31, 2018 (1)

November 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018

December 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018

Total

Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased

Average
Price Paid
per Share

Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans
or Programs (2)

Maximum Number of
Shares That May Yet Be
Purchased Under the Plans
or Programs (2)

430

$

83.03

—

—

—

—

430

$

83.03

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(1) In October 2018, we purchased shares of common stock on the open market for the purpose of reinvesting the dividend on shares held in the Rabbi Trust 
accounts for certain Directors and Senior Executives under the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. The Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan is 
discussed in detail in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (see Note 17, Employee Benefit Plans, in the consolidated financial statements). 
During the quarter, 430 shares were purchased through the reinvestment of dividends.  
(2) Except for the purpose described in footnote (1), we have no publicly announced plans or programs to repurchase our shares.

Discussion of our compensation plans, for which shares of our common stock are authorized for issuance, is included in the section 
of our Proxy Statement captioned “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 19

 
Common Stock Performance Graph

The stock performance graph and table below compares cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock during the five 
fiscal years ended December 31, 2018, with the cumulative total stockholder return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the 
cumulative total stockholder return of select peers, which include the following companies: Atmos Energy Corporation; Black 
Hills  Corporation;  New  Jersey  Resources  Corporation;  NiSource  Inc.;  Northwest  Natural  Holding  Company;  NorthWestern 
Corporation;  ONE  Gas  Inc.;  RGC  Resources,  Inc.;  South  Jersey  Industries,  Inc.;  Spire  Inc.;  Unitil  Corporation;  and Vectren 
Corporation.

The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2013 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and 
assumes reinvested dividends. The comparisons in the graph below are based on historical data and are not intended to forecast 
the possible future performance of our common stock.

Chesapeake Utilities
Industry Index
S&P 500 Index

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

$
$
$

100
100
100

$
$
$

127
121
114

$
$
$

149
135
115

$
$
$

179
158
129

$
$
$

213
189
157

$
$
$

225
202
150

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 20

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 

Operating
(in thousands)
Revenues

For the Year Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

Regulated Energy
Unregulated Energy
Other businesses and eliminations

Total revenues
Operating income(1)

Regulated Energy
Unregulated Energy
Other businesses and eliminations

Total operating income
Net income from continuing operations

$

$

$

$
$

345,281
420,617
(48,409)
717,489

$ 326,310
324,595
(33,322)
$ 617,583

79,215
16,901
(1,496)
94,620
56,580

$

$
$

74,584
12,631
205
87,420
58,124

$

$

$

$
$

305,689
203,778
(10,607)
498,860

71,515
14,066
402
85,983
44,675

$

$

$

$
$

301,902
162,108
(4,766)
459,244

62,137
16,437
418
78,992
41,140

Assets
(in thousands)

Gross property, plant and equipment
Net property, plant and equipment
Total assets
Capital expenditures

$ 1,569,683
$ 1,383,972
$ 1,693,671

$

282,976

$ 1,312,117
$ 1,126,027
$ 1,414,934
$ 191,103

$ 1,175,595
986,664
$
$ 1,229,219
169,376
$

$ 1,007,489
854,950
$
$ 1,067,421
195,261
$

Capitalization
(in thousands)

Stockholders’ equity
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
Total capitalization
Current portion of long-term debt
Short-term debt
Total capitalization and short-term financing

$

$

518,439
316,020
834,459
11,935
294,458
$ 1,140,852

$ 486,294
197,395
$ 683,689
9,421
250,969
$ 944,079

$

$

$

446,086
136,954
583,040
12,099
209,871
805,010

$

$

$

358,138
149,006
507,144
9,151
173,397
689,692

$

$

$

$
$

$
$
$
$

$

$

$

300,442
184,961
13,431
498,834

51,173
11,686
104
62,963
36,092

870,125
689,762
904,469
98,057

300,322
158,486
458,808
9,109
88,231
556,148

(1) During the first quarter of 2018, we adopted amended FASB guidance on the presentation of net periodic and postretirement benefit cost ("net benefit cost").  
As a result, the components of net benefit cost other than the service component are presented below the subtotal of Operating Income in the consolidated statements 
of income.  All prior periods have been recast to conform to this presentation.  

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 21

Common Stock Data and Ratios

Basic earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share growth - 1 year

Diluted earnings per share growth - 5 year

Diluted earnings per share growth - 10 year

Return on average equity
Common equity / total capitalization
Common equity / total capitalization and short-term
financing
Capital expenditures / average total capitalization
Book value per share (1)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (1)
Shares outstanding at year-end (1)
Cash dividends declared per share (1)
Dividend yield (annualized) (2)
Book yield (3)
Payout ratio (4)

Additional Data

Customers

Natural gas distribution
Electric distribution
Propane operations

Total employees

For the Year Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

$

$

3.46

3.45

$

$

(2.8)%

8.8 %

10.1 %

11.2 %

62.1 %

45.4 %

37.3 %

$

$

3.56

3.55

24.1%

12.3%

10.7%

12.6%

71.1%

51.5%

30.2%

$

$

2.87

2.86

5.1%

8.4%

9.3%

11.3%

76.5%

55.4%

31.1%

$

$

2.73

2.72

10.1%

8.4%

8.4%

12.1%

70.6%

51.9%

29.5%

2.48

2.47

9.3%

11.6%

8.5%

12.2%

65.5%

54.0%

22.9%

$

31.65

$

29.75

$

27.36

$

23.45

$

20.59

16,369,616

16,336,789

15,570,539

15,094,423

14,551,308

16,378,545

16,344,442

16,303,499

15,270,659

14,588,711

$

1.44

$

1.28

$

1.20

$

1.13

$

1.07

1.8 %

4.7 %

41.6 %

1.7%

4.5%

36.0%

1.8%

4.7%

41.8%

2.0%

5.1%

41.5%

2.2%

5.4%

43.0%

158,387

153,537

149,179

144,872

141,227

32,185

56,915

983

32,026

54,760

945

31,695

54,947

903

31,430

53,682

832

31,272

53,272

753

(1) Shares and per share amounts for all periods presented reflect the three-for-two stock split declared on July 2, 2014, effected in the form of a stock dividend, 
and distributed on September 8, 2014.
(2) Dividend yield (annualized) is calculated by multiplying the fourth quarter dividend by four (4), then dividing that amount by the closing common stock price 
at December 31.
(3) The book yield is calculated by dividing cash dividends declared per share (for the year) by average book value per share (for the year). 
(4) The payout ratio is calculated by dividing cash dividends declared per share (for the year) by basic earnings per share.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 22

 
 
ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This section provides management’s discussion of Chesapeake Utilities and its consolidated subsidiaries, with specific information 
on results of operations, liquidity and capital resources, as well as discussion of how certain accounting principles affect our 
financial  statements.  It  includes  management’s  interpretation  of  our  financial  results  and  our  operating  segments,  the  factors 
affecting these results, the major factors expected to affect future operating results as well as investment and financing plans. This 
discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Item 8, Financial Statements 
and Supplementary Data.

Several factors exist that could influence our future financial performance, some of which are described in Item 1A, Risk Factors. 
They should be considered in connection with forward-looking statements contained in this report, or otherwise made by or on 
behalf of us, since these factors could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those set out in such forward-
looking statements.

The following discussions and those later in the document on operating income and segment results include the use of the term 
“gross margin," which is determined by deducting the cost of sales from operating revenue. Cost of sales includes the purchased 
cost  of  natural  gas,  electricity  and  propane  and  the  cost  of  labor  spent  on  direct  revenue-producing  activities,  and  excludes 
depreciation, amortization and accretion. Gross margin should not be considered an alternative to operating income or net income, 
which are determined in accordance with GAAP. We believe that gross margin, although a non-GAAP measure, is useful and 
meaningful to investors as a basis for making investment decisions. It provides investors with information that demonstrates the 
profitability achieved by us under our allowed rates for regulated energy operations and under our competitive pricing structures 
for unregulated energy operations. Our management uses gross margin in measuring our business units’ performance and has 
historically analyzed and reported gross margin information publicly. Other companies may calculate gross margin in a different 
manner.

Earnings per share information is presented on a diluted basis, unless otherwise noted.

OVERVIEW AND HIGHLIGHTS

(in thousands except per share data)

For the Year Ended December 31,
Operating Income:

Regulated Energy
Unregulated Energy
Other businesses and eliminations

Total Operating Income
Other expense
Interest charges
Income Before Income Taxes
Income taxes
Net Income
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock:
Basic
Diluted

2018

2017

(decrease)

2017

2016

(decrease)

Increase

Increase

$

$

$
$

79,215
16,901
(1,496)
94,620
(615)
16,431
77,574
20,994
56,580

3.46
3.45

$

$

$
$

74,584
12,631
205
87,420
(2,342)
12,645
72,433
14,309
58,124

3.56
3.55

$

$

$
$

$

4,631
4,270
(1,701)
7,200
1,727
3,786
5,141
6,685
(1,544) $

74,584
12,631
205
87,420
(2,342)
12,645
72,433
14,309
58,124

(0.10) $
(0.10) $

3.56
3.55

$

$

$
$

71,515
14,066
402
85,983
(2,328)
10,639
73,016
28,341
44,675

2.87
2.86

$

$

$
$

3,069
(1,435)
(197)
1,437
(14)
2,006
(583)
(14,032)
13,449

0.69
0.69

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 23

 
 
 
 
2018 compared to 2017
Our net income decreased by approximately $1.5 million or $0.10 per share in 2018, compared to 2017. Key variances included:

(in thousands, except per share data)

Year ended December 31, 2017 Reported Results

Adjusting for unusual items:

Pre-tax
Income

Net
Income

Earnings
Per Share

$

72,433

$

58,124

$

3.55

Absence of the 2017 deferred tax revaluation benefit associated with the TCJA

—

(14,299)

Net impact of PESCO's MTM activity

One-time separation expenses associated with a former executive

Absence of Xeron expenses, including 2017 wind-down expenses

Increased (Decreased) Gross Margins:

Eastern Shore and Peninsula Pipeline service expansions*
Pass-through of lower taxes to regulated energy customers(1)
Natural gas growth (excluding service expansions)
Implementation of Eastern Shore settled rates*(2)
Impact on PESCO from Bomb Cyclone and pipeline capacity constraints

Colder weather

Unregulated Energy growth, excluding PESCO

Florida electric reliability/modernization program*

Florida GRIP*

Other margin for PESCO operations (net)

Decreased (Increased) Other Operating Expenses(3):
Depreciation, asset removal and property taxes

Payroll expense (increased staffing and annual salary increases)

Facilities maintenance costs

Operating expenses to increase staffing, infrastructure and risk management systems 
necessary to support growth for PESCO(3)
Outside services

Vehicle, other taxes and credit collections

Other employee-related expenses

Incentive compensation costs

Outside regulatory costs

Early termination of facility lease due to consolidation of operations facilities

Interest charges
Income taxes - Regulated Energy (1)
Other income tax effects - primarily the impact of  income  rate tax changes on
Unregulated businesses

Net Other changes

10,423

(1,548)

829

9,704

9,709

(9,562)

5,911

5,803

(5,545)

5,046

3,140

1,516

1,277

(489)

16,806

(4,779)

(4,349)

(2,687)

(2,665)

(2,182)

(1,551)

(1,100)

734

661

(423)

(18,341)

(3,786)

—

—

758

7,602

(1,421)

605

(7,513)

7,082

(6,975)

4,311

4,233

(4,044)

3,680

2,290

1,106

932

(357)

12,258

(3,486)

(3,172)

(1,960)

(1,944)

(1,592)

(1,131)

(802)

535

482

(309)

(13,379)

(2,762)

6,975

2,323

554

Year ended December 31, 2018 Reported Results

$

77,574

$

56,580

$

(0.87)

0.46

(0.09)

0.04

(0.46)

0.43

(0.42)

0.26

0.26

(0.25)

0.22

0.14

0.07

0.06

(0.02)

0.75

(0.21)

(0.19)

(0.12)

(0.12)

(0.10)

(0.07)

(0.05)

0.03

0.03

(0.02)

(0.82)

(0.17)

0.42

0.14

0.04

3.45

(1) "Pass-through of lower taxes to regulated customers" represents the amounts that have already been refunded to customers or reserves 
established for future refunds and/or reduced rates to customers in 2018 as a result of lower taxes due to the TCJA.  Refunds made to 
customers are offset by the corresponding decrease in federal income taxes expense and are expected to have no net impact on net income.

(2) Excluding amounts refunded to customers associated with the TCJA, which are broken out separately and discussed in footnote 1.
(3)As a result of increased staffing, infrastructure and risk management systems to support growth for PESCO, operating expenses for PESCO 

are presented separately.

* See the Major Projects and Initiatives table.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 24

2017 compared to 2016
Our net income increased by approximately $13.4 million or $0.69 per share (diluted) in 2017, compared to 2016. Key variances 
included:

(in thousands, except per share data)
Year ended December 31, 2016 Reported Results

Adjusting for unusual items:

Deferred tax revaluation benefit associated with the TCJA

Net impact of PESCO's MTM activity

        Impact of winding down of Xeron operations and absence of 2016 loss

Increased (Decreased) Gross Margins:

Eight Flags' CHP plant

Implementation of new base rates for Eastern Shore*

PESCO - margin from operations

Natural gas growth (excluding service expansions)

Service expansions*

Florida GRIP*

Aspire Energy rates and management fees

Customer consumption (non-weather)

Implementation of Delaware Division settled rates

Wholesale propane sales and margins

Retail propane margins

     Weather impact

Margin from Sandpiper System Improvement Rate

(Increased) Decreased Other Operating Expenses:

Payroll expense

Depreciation, asset removal and property tax costs due to new capital investments

Eight Flags' operating expenses

Benefit and other employee-related expenses

Regulatory expenses associated with rate filings

Taxes other than property and income

Credit, collections & customer service expenses

Outside services and facilities maintenance costs

Vehicle expenses

Sales and advertising expenses

Increase in outstanding shares from the September 2016 public offering

Interest charges

Change in other expense

Change in effective tax rate prior to tax reform

Net other changes

Year ended December 31, 2017 Reported Results

* See the Major Projects and Initiatives table.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 25

Pre-tax
Income

Net
Income

Earnings
Per Share

$

73,016

$ 44,675

$

2.86

—

(5,783)

745

14,299

(3,499)

451

(5,038)

11,251

4,901

3,693

3,365

2,818

2,062

1,902

1,125

721

831

678

645

578

291

2,965

2,234

2,036

1,705

1,248

1,151

680

436

503

410

390

350

176

23,610

14,284

(6,487)

(5,120)

(2,920)

(1,485)

(1,005)

(739)

515

417

(372)

(259)

(3,925)

(3,098)

(1,767)

(899)

(608)

(447)

311

252

(225)

(157)

(17,455)

(10,563)

—

(2,006)

(191)

—

497

—

(1,214)

(115)

(500)

306

$

72,433

$ 58,124

$

0.87

(0.21)

0.03

0.69

0.19

0.14

0.13

0.11

0.08

0.07

0.04

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.02

0.02

0.01

0.90

(0.25)

(0.20)

(0.11)

(0.06)

(0.04)

(0.03)

0.02

0.02

(0.01)

(0.01)

(0.67)

(0.16)

(0.08)

(0.01)

(0.03)

0.05

3.55

SUMMARY OF KEY FACTORS

Recently Completed and Ongoing Major Projects and Initiatives 

We constantly seek and develop additional projects and initiatives in order to increase shareholder value and serve our customers.  
The following table represents the major projects recently completed and currently underway.  In the future, we will add new 
projects to this table as such projects are initiated:

Project / Initiative

(in thousands)

Florida GRIP
Eastern Shore Rate Case (1)
Florida Electric Reliability/Modernization Pilot Program (1)
New Smyrna Beach, Florida(1)
2017 Eastern Shore System Expansion -  including interim services (1)
Northwest Florida Expansion(1)
Western Palm Beach County, Florida Expansion(1)
Marlin Gas Services

Ohl propane acquisition (rolled into Sharp)

Total

Gross Margin for the Period

Year Ended December 31,

Estimate for
Fiscal

2016

2017

2018

2019

$

11,552

$

13,454

$

14,731

$

16,276

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

3,693

94

235

483

—

—

—

—

9,496

1,610

1,409

8,015

3,485

54

110

—

9,800

1,558

1,409

15,709

6,500

1,250

4,475

1,200

$

11,552

$

17,959

$

38,910

$

58,177

(1) Gross margin amount included in this table has not been adjusted to reflect the impact of the TCJA. The refunds and rate reductions implemented were or 
will be, offset by lower federal income taxes due to the TCJA.

Ongoing Growth Initiatives

Florida GRIP

Florida GRIP is a natural gas pipe replacement program approved by the Florida PSC that allows automatic recovery, through 
rates, of costs associated with the replacement of mains and services. Since the program's inception in August 2012, we have 
invested $127.0 million to replace 268 miles of qualifying distribution mains, including $13.3 million and $10.8 million during 
2018 and 2017, respectively.  GRIP generated additional gross margin of $1.3 million in 2018 compared to 2017. 

Regulatory Proceedings

Eastern Shore Rate Case
Eastern Shore's rate case settlement agreement became final on April 1, 2018, with settlement rates effective August 1, 2017 and 
tax-adjusted rates effective January 1, 2018. The final agreement increases Eastern Shore's operating income by $6.6 million, 
representing an estimated $9.8 million in additional margin from base rates offset by an estimated $3.2 million in lower federal 
income tax expense for Eastern Shore resulting from the TCJA.  In 2018, Eastern Shore recognized incremental gross margin of 
approximately $5.8 million and provided rate reductions to customers totaling approximately $3.3 million as a result of the new 
rates.  Annual margin from the new rates in future years is estimated to be $9.8 million.

Florida Electric Reliability/Modernization Pilot Program
In December 2017, the Florida PSC approved a $1.6 million annualized rate increase, effective January 2018, for the recovery of 
a limited number of investments and costs related to reliability, safety and modernization for our Florida electric distribution 
system. This increase will continue through at least the last billing cycle of December 2019.  For the years ended December 31, 
2018 and 2017, incremental gross margin of $1.5 million and $94,000, respectively, was generated by this program. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 26

Major Projects and Initiatives Currently Underway

New Smyrna Beach, Florida Project
In the fourth quarter of 2017, we commenced construction of a 14-mile natural gas transmission pipeline to serve current customers 
and planned customer growth in the New Smyrna Beach service area. A portion of the project was placed into service at the end 
of 2017, and the remainder was placed into service during the fourth quarter of 2018.  For the year ended December 31, 2018, the 
project generated incremental gross margin of approximately $1.2 million compared to 2017 and is expected to generate $1.4 
million in annual gross margin going forward.

2017 Eastern Shore System Expansion Project
From November 2017 to December 2018, Eastern Shore substantially completed the construction of a system expansion project 
that increased its capacity by 26 percent. The first phase of the project was placed into service in December 2017.  The project 
generated $7.5 million in incremental gross margin, including margin from interim services, for the year ended December 31, 
2018, compared to 2017. It is expected to produce annual gross margin of approximately $15.7 million in 2019, $15.8 million
from 2020 through 2022 and $13.2 million thereafter. 

Northwest Florida Expansion Project
In our first expansion of natural gas service into Northwest Florida, Peninsula Pipeline completed construction of transmission 
lines and the Florida natural gas division completed construction of lateral distribution lines to serve several customers. The project 
was placed into service in May 2018 and generated gross margin of $3.5 million during 2018. The estimated annual gross margin 
going forward is $6.5 million.

Western Palm Beach County Belvedere, Florida Project
Peninsula Pipeline is constructing four transmission lines to bring natural gas to our distribution system in West Palm Beach, 
Florida. The first phase of this project was placed into service in December 2018 and generated gross margin of $54,000 during 
2018.  We expect to complete the remainder of the project in phases through early 2020 and estimate gross margin of $1.3 million 
in 2019 and approximately $5.4 million in future years once fully in service.  

Marlin Gas Services
In December 2018, Marlin Gas Services, our newly created subsidiary, acquired certain operating assets of Marlin Gas Transport, 
a supplier of mobile compressed natural gas utility and pipeline solutions.  The acquisition will allow us to offer solutions to 
address supply interruption scenarios and provide other unique applications where pipeline supplies are not available or cannot 
meet customer requirements. Operating margins generated in 2018 were immaterial, given the date of acquisition.  We estimate 
that this acquisition will generate additional annual gross margin of approximately $4.5 million in 2019, with potential for additional 
growth in future years.  

Ohl Propane Acquisition 
In December 2018, Sharp Energy acquired certain propane customers and operating assets of R.F. Ohl Fuel Oil, Inc ("Ohl").  Ohl 
provided propane distribution service to approximately 2,500 residential and commercial customers in Pennsylvania, located 
between two of Sharp's existing districts. The customers and assets acquired from Ohl have been assimilated into Sharp.  Operating 
margins generated in 2018 were immaterial, given the date of acquisition.  We estimate that this acquisition will generate additional 
gross margin of approximately $1.2 million for Sharp in 2019, with the potential for additional growth in future years.

Future Projects Not Included in the Table Above 

Del-Mar Energy Pathway Project
In September 2018, Eastern Shore filed for FERC authorization to construct the Del-Mar Energy Pathway project to provide an 
additional 14,300 Dts/d of capacity to four customers. The benefits of this project include additional natural gas transmission 
pipeline  infrastructure  in  eastern  Sussex  County,  Delaware,  and  the  initial  extension  of  Eastern  Shore’s  pipeline  system  into 
Somerset County, Maryland. The estimated annual gross margin from this project is $5.1 million. Eastern Shore anticipates that 
this project will be fully in-service by the third quarter of 2020, assuming that the FERC authorizes the project by August 2019.

Other Major Factors Influencing Gross Margin

Weather and Consumption

The impact of colder temperatures on customer consumption during 2018 contributed $5.0 million in incremental gross margin 
compared to 2017.  While 2018 was colder than 2017, it was still 1.1 percent warmer than normal (average across our service 
territories).  Normal weather during 2018 would have generated $4.0 million in additional gross margin.  The following table 
summarizes HDD and CDD variances from the 10-year average HDD/CDD ("Normal") for 2018, 2017 and 2016. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 27

HDD and CDD Information

For the Years Ended December 31,

2018

2017

Variance

2017

2016

Variance

Delmarva

Actual HDD

10-Year Average HDD ("Normal")

Variance from Normal

Florida

Actual HDD

10-Year Average HDD ("Normal")

Variance from Normal

Ohio

Actual HDD

10-Year Average HDD ("Normal")

Variance from Normal

Florida

Actual CDD

10-Year Average CDD ("Normal")

Variance from Normal

4,251

4,379

(128)

3,800

4,374
(574)

780

800

(20)

5,845

5,823

22

3,105

2,889

216

533

818
(285)

5,126

5,914
(788)

3,013

2,865

148

451

5

247
(18)

719
(91)

92

24

3,800

4,374
(574)

3,979

4,453
(474)

533

818
(285)

672

828
(156)

5,126

5,914
(788)

5,529

5,918
(389)

3,013

2,865

148

3,152

2,820

332

(179)
(79)

(139)
(10)

(403)
(4)

(139)
45

Hurricane Michael Update
In October 2018, Hurricane Michael passed through FPU's electric distribution operation's service territory in Northwest Florida. 
The hurricane caused widespread and severe damage to FPU's infrastructure resulting in 100 percent of its customers losing 
electrical service. FPU has restored service to those customers who were able to accept service following Hurricane Michael after 
a significant hurricane restoration effort.   In conjunction with restoring these services, FPU expended over $60 million to restore 
service, which has been recorded as new plant and equipment or charged against FPU’s accumulated depreciation and storm 
reserve.  We have begun preparing the necessary regulatory filings to seek recovery for the costs incurred, including replenishment 
of our storm reserve.  In conjunction with the hurricane-related expenditures, we executed two 13-month unsecured term loans 
as temporary financing, each in the amount of $30 million.  The interest cost associated with these loans is LIBOR plus 75 basis 
points.  One of the term loans was executed in December 2018 and the other was executed in January 2019. The storm did not 
have a material impact on our financial results in 2018 as services were restored to a majority of our customers, and is not expected 
to have a significant impact going forward as we will be seeking recovery of the storm costs through rates.

Natural Gas Distribution Customer and Consumption Growth
Customer growth for our natural gas distribution operations generated $3.9 million in additional gross margin for the year ended 
December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017.  The additional margin was generated from an increase of approximately 
3.3 percent in the average number of residential customers served, growth in volumes delivered to commercial and industrial 
customers on the Delmarva Peninsula and in Florida, and new service initiated to customers in Northwest Florida. Higher residential 
and commercial customers' consumption increased gross margin by $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared 
to the same period in 2017.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 28

(in thousands)

Customer growth:

Residential

Commercial and industrial, excluding new service in Northwest Florida

New service in Northwest Florida

Total customer growth

Volume growth:

Residential

Commercial and industrial

Other  - including unbilled revenue

Total volume growth

Total natural gas distribution growth

Propane Operations

Increase (decrease) in
Margin in 2018

$

$

1,604

1,322

987

3,913

655

1,522
(179)
1,998

5,911

The Company's Florida and Mid-Atlantic propane distribution operations continue to pursue a multi-pronged growth plan, which 
includes: targeting retail and wholesale customer growth in existing markets, both organically as well as through acquisitions; 
incremental growth from recent and planned start-ups in new markets; targeting new community gas systems in high growth areas; 
further build-out of the Company's propane vehicular platform through AutoGas fueling stations; and optimization of its supply 
portfolio to generate incremental margin opportunities. Our propane operations and AutoGas segment install and support propane 
vehicle conversion systems for vehicle fleets, including converting fleets to bi-fuel propane-powered engines and providing on-
site fueling infrastructure.  These operations generated $4.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017. 
Colder temperatures accounted for $2.2 million of the margin increase.  The balance of the gross margin increase for the year 
reflected  the  impact  of  the  growth  strategies  discussed  above,  including  generating  approximately  a  four-percent  increase  in 
customers.  Supply management initiatives have also increased retail propane margins from many customer classes and margin 
from wholesale propane sales.

PESCO

In 2018, PESCO's gross margin increased by $4.4 million compared to 2017. Higher gross margin in 2018 from PESCO resulted 
from the following:

(in thousands)

Net impact of PESCO's MTM activity
Net impact of extraordinary costs associated with the 2018 Bomb Cyclone for the Mid-Atlantic wholesale portfolio (1)
Loss for the Mid-Atlantic retail portfolio caused by pipeline capacity constraints in January and warm weather in February 
2018 (1)
Other margin for PESCO operations (net)

Total Change in Gross Margin for PESCO in 2018

Margin
Impact

$

10,423

(3,284)

(2,261)

(489)

4,389

$

(1) The 2018 Bomb Cyclone refers to the high-intensity winter storms in early January 2018 that impacted the Mid-Atlantic region and which had a residual impact 
on our businesses through the month of February.   The exceedingly high demand and associated impacts on pipeline capacity and gas supply in the Mid-Atlantic 
region created significant, unusual costs for PESCO. While such concerted impacts will recur infrequently, our management revisited and refined its risk management 
strategies and implemented additional controls.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, PESCO reported an operating loss of $1.4 million, compared to an operating loss of $3.1 
million during the prior year period. The year-over-year improvement in operating loss reflects primarily increased gross margin 
of $4.4 million, for the reasons discussed in the table above, which was offset by an increase of $2.7 million in other operating 
expenses as a result of increased staffing, infrastructure and risk management system costs to ensure the appropriate infrastructure 
is in place as PESCO executes its growth strategy.

Xeron

Xeron's operations were wound down during the second quarter of 2017.  Operating income in 2018 improved by $718,000 over 
2017, due to the absence of an operating loss and wind-down expenses incurred in 2017.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 29

REGULATED ENERGY

For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross margin
Operations & maintenance
Gain from a settlement

Depreciation & amortization
Other taxes
Other operating expenses
Operating Income

2018 compared to 2017 

2018

2017

Increase
(decrease)

2017

2016

Increase
(decrease)

$

$

345,281
121,828
223,453
97,741

(130)
31,876
14,751
144,238
79,215

$

$

326,310
118,769
207,541
90,931
(130)
28,554
13,602
132,957
74,584

$

$

18,971
3,059
15,912
6,810
—
3,322
1,149
11,281
4,631

$

$

326,310
118,769
207,541
90,931
(130)
28,554
13,602
132,957
74,584

$

$

305,689
109,609
196,080
86,434
(130)
25,677
12,584
124,565
71,515

$

$

20,621
9,160
11,461
4,497
—
2,877
1,018
8,392
3,069

Operating income for the Regulated Energy segment for 2018 was $79.2 million, an increase of $4.6 million, or 6.2 percent, 
compared to 2017.  Adjusting for the estimated pass-through of lower taxes to customers, operating income increased by $14.2 
million or 19.0 percent, compared to the prior year.  The growth in operating income was due to an increase in gross margin of 
$15.9 million, $25.5 million adjusted for the tax pass-through, partially offset by $11.3 million in higher other operating expenses 
to support the margin growth.  Growth in 2018 was strong across all business units in the regulated energy segment with the most 
significant contributions coming from expansions at Peninsula Pipeline and Eastern Shore, customer and consumption growth in 
the  natural  gas  distribution  operations,  colder  weather,  and  safety  and  reliability  investments  in  the  Florida  electric  and  gas 
distribution operations. 

Gross Margin 

Items contributing to the year-over-year gross margin increase are listed in the following table:

(in thousands)

Eastern Shore and Peninsula Pipeline service expansions
Natural gas growth (excluding service expansions)
Implementation of Eastern Shore settled rates
Colder weather
Florida electric reliability/modernization program
Florida GRIP
Other

Total
Less: Pass-through to regulated customers of lower taxes as a result of the TCJA*
Year-over-year increase in gross margin

Margin Impact

9,709
5,911
5,803
1,788
1,516
1,277
(530)
25,474
(9,562)
15,912

$

$

*As a result of the TCJA and resulting directives by federal and state regulatory commissions, we reserved or refunded to customers of our regulated businesses 
an estimated $9.6 million in 2018. In some jurisdictions, we have paid refunds to customers, while in other jurisdictions, we have established reserves until 
agreements are approved and changes are made to customer rates. The reserves and lower customer rates are equal to the estimated reduction in federal income 
taxes due to the TCJA and have no material impact on after-tax earnings from the Regulated Energy segment.

The following is a narrative discussion of the significant items in the foregoing table, which we believe is necessary to understand 
the information disclosed in the table. 

Service Expansions
The following natural gas pipeline service expansions generated additional gross margin of $9.7 million in 2018: 

• 

$7.5 million from Eastern Shore's services, including those provided to customers on an interim basis, in conjunction 
with portions of Eastern Shore's 2017 Expansion Project that were placed in service, partially offset by the absence of 
$2.0 million in short-term contracts that were replaced by long-term service agreements; and 

• 

$4.7 million generated by Peninsula Pipeline from the New Smyrna Beach and Northwest Pipeline Expansion Projects. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 30

 
 
 
 
 
 
Natural Gas Growth (excluding service expansions)
We  generated  increased  gross  margin  of  $5.9  million  in  2018  from  natural  gas  growth  and  consumption  (excluding  service 
expansions) primarily from the following:

• 

• 

$2.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively, from residential and commercial customer growth in Florida and on the 
Delmarva Peninsula; and

$2.0 million from higher sales volumes (consumption) on the Delmarva Peninsula and in Florida that were not driven by 
weather.

Implementation of Eastern Shore's Settled Rates
Eastern Shore generated additional gross margin of $5.8 million from the implementation of new rates as a result of its rate case 
filing. See Note 19, Rates and Other Regulatory Activities, to the consolidated financial statements for additional details.

Colder Weather
Temperatures during 2018 were 1.1 percent warmer than normal (average across our service territories), compared to 14.8 percent
warmer than normal (average across our service territories) during 2017.  The colder weather increased usage and generated $1.8 
million in additional margin for 2018.  

Florida Electric Reliability/Modernization Program
This program generated incremental gross margin of $1.5 million in 2018.  See Note 19, Rates and Other Regulatory Activities,
to the consolidated financial statements for additional details.

Florida GRIP 
Continued investment in the Florida GRIP generated additional gross margin of $1.3 million in 2018 compared to 2017. 

Impact of the TCJA on Customer Rates
Implementation of the TCJA in 2018, decreased gross margin by $9.6 million due to refunds and reserves for future refunds and/
or rate reductions to customers.  The decrease in gross margin was offset by an equal reduction in federal income taxes, and, 
therefore had no impact on net income.  See Note 19, Rates and Other Regulatory Activities, for additional discussion of the TCJA 
impact. 

Other Operating Expenses 

Other  operating  expenses  increased  by  $11.3  million,  incurred  primarily  to  support  business  growth. The  significant  factors 
contributing to the increase in other operating expenses included:

• 
• 

• 
• 
• 
• 

$4.2 million in higher depreciation, asset removal and property tax costs associated with recent capital investments;
$2.4 million in higher payroll expenses related to staffing and salary increases. This increase was partially offset by lower 
incentive compensation costs of $737,000;
$2.2 million in higher costs related to outside services to support growth;
$1.7 million in higher facilities and maintenance costs to maintain system integrity; 
$869,000 in higher vehicle, other taxes and credit collections; and 
$514,000 in other employee-related expenses. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 31

2017 compared to 2016 

Operating income for the Regulated Energy segment for 2017 was $74.6 million, an increase of $3.1 million, or 4.3 percent, 
compared to 2016. The increased operating income was due to an increase in gross margin of $11.5 million, partially offset by 
higher other operating expenses of $8.4 million. 

Gross Margin 

Items contributing to the year-over-year gross margin increase are listed in the following table: 

(in thousands)

Margin Impact

Implementation of Eastern Shore rates
Natural gas growth (including customer and consumption growth but excluding service
expansions)

Eastern Shore and Peninsula Pipeline service expansions
Florida GRIP
Implementation of Delaware Division rates (2017 Settlement)
New natural gas transmission and distribution service to Eight Flags CHP plant
Other
Year-over-year increase in gross margin

$

$

3,693

2,818
2,062
1,902
831
537
(382)
11,461

The following is a narrative discussion of significant items in the foregoing table for which we have additional information that 
we believe is necessary to understand the information disclosed in the table. 

Implementation of Eastern Shore Rates
Eastern Shore generated additional gross margin of $3.7 million from implementation of new base rates in 2017 as a result of its 
rate case filing. See Note 19, Rates and Other Regulatory Activities, to the consolidated financial statements for additional details.

Natural Gas Growth (including customer and consumption growth but excluding service expansions) 
In 2017, growth in customers and consumption generated increased gross margin of $2.8 million including: 

• 

• 

$1.6 million from a 3.8 percent increase in the average number of residential customers served by the Delmarva natural 
gas distribution operations, as well as growth in the number of commercial and industrial customers served; and 

$1.2 million from our Florida natural gas distribution operations' customer growth, with approximately two-thirds of the 
margin  growth  generated  from  commercial  and  industrial  customers  and  one-third  generated  from  new  residential 
customers.

Service Expansions
We generated additional gross margin of $2.1 million in 2017 from the following natural gas services:

• 

• 

• 

• 

$1.2 million from short-term firm service available through Eastern Shore's natural gas receipt capacity from TETLP; 

$433,000 from interim services provided by Eastern Shore after a portion of an expansion project was placed in service 
in December 2017;

$298,000 from Eastern Shore's increased long-term firm service rates for an industrial customer in Delaware; and

$235,000 generated by Peninsula Pipeline from the New Smyrna Beach Expansion Project.

Florida GRIP
Increased investment in GRIP generated additional gross margin of $1.9 million in 2017 compared to 2016. 

Implementation of Delaware Division Rates
Our Delaware Division generated additional gross margin of $831,000 as a result of its rate case settlement in 2017. 

Service to Eight Flags
We generated additional gross margin of $537,000 in 2017, compared to 2016, from new natural gas transmission and distribution 
services provided to Eight Flags' CHP plant. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 32

Other Operating Expenses

Other  operating  expenses  increased  by  $8.4  million. The  significant  components  of  the  increase  in  other  operating  expenses 
included:
• 
• 
• 

$4.1 million in higher depreciation, asset removal and property tax costs associated with recent capital investments;
$3.6 million in higher payroll expenses for additional personnel to support growth; and
$1.0 million in increased regulatory expenses, due primarily to costs associated with Eastern Shore’s rate case filing in 
2017; which was partially offset by
$529,000 in lower credit, collection and customer services expenses.

• 

UNREGULATED ENERGY

For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross margin
Operations & maintenance
Depreciation & amortization
Other taxes
Other operating expenses
Operating Income

2018 Compared to 2017 

2018

2017

(decrease)

2017

2016

(decrease)

Increase

Increase

$

$

420,617
336,819
83,798
54,263
8,845
3,789
66,897
16,901

$

$

324,595
252,023
72,572
48,576
7,954
3,411
59,941
12,631

$

$

96,022
84,796
11,226
5,687
891
378
6,956
4,270

$

$

324,595
252,023
72,572
48,576
7,954
3,411
59,941
12,631

$

$

203,778
138,816
64,962
42,437
6,386
2,073
50,896
14,066

$

$

120,817
113,207
7,610
6,139
1,568
1,338
9,045
(1,435)

Operating income for the Unregulated Energy segment for 2018 was $16.9 million, an increase of $4.3 million compared to 2017. 
The increased operating income was due to an increase in gross margin of $11.2 million, which was partially offset by an increase 
of $7.0 million in other operating expenses. 

Given the impact of the MTM gain and loss recorded by PESCO in the first quarter of 2018 and fourth quarter of 2017, respectively, 
and the increased staffing, infrastructure and risk management systems implemented to support PESCO's growth, the Company 
is continuing to present PESCO’s 2018 results separate from the rest of its Unregulated Energy segment:

Unregulated Energy, excluding PESCO

For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
Gross margin
Depreciation, amortization and
property taxes

Other operating expenses
Operating Income

2018

2017

(decrease)

2017

2016

(decrease)

Increase

Increase

$

77,197

$

70,360

$

6,837

$

70,360

$

60,332

$

10,028

9,678
49,197
18,322

$

9,081
45,504
15,775

$

$

597
3,693
2,547

$

9,081
45,504
15,775

$

7,047
41,085
12,200

$

2,034
4,419
3,575

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 33

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross Margin

Items contributing to the year-over-year increase in gross margin are listed in the following table:

(in thousands)
Propane Operations

Customer growth, increased sales volumes (non-weather related) and other factors
Additional customer consumption from colder weather
Decreased margins per gallon in certain customer classes
Service, appliances and other fees
Higher wholesale propane margins and sales

Aspire Energy

Higher customer consumption from colder weather
Increase in rates effective on various dates in 2018

Other
Year-over-year increase in gross margin

Margin Impact

2,947
2,241
(977)
404
287

1,017
602
316
6,837

$

The following is a narrative discussion of the significant items in the foregoing table, which we believe is necessary to understand 
the information disclosed in the table.

Propane Operations - Increased Margin Driven by Growth and Other Factors
Gross margin increased by $2.9 million, due to increased propane sales as a result of customer growth, higher sales volumes and 
other factors in Florida and the Mid-Atlantic region.

Propane Operations - Increased Customer Consumption - (Weather)
Gross margin increased by $2.2 million, due primarily to increased customer consumption in the Mid-Atlantic region as a result 
of colder temperatures in 2018 compared to 2017.

Aspire Energy - Increased Customer Consumption (Weather)
Gross margin increased by $1.0 million, as a result of increased natural gas delivered, due primarily to colder temperatures in 2018 
when compared to temperatures in 2017.

Propane Operations - Decreased retail margins per gallon for certain customer classes
Gross margin decreased by $1.0 million, driven by lower sales prices for primarily two customer classes in response to market 
conditions. 

Propane Operations - Services, appliances and other fees
Gross margin increased by $404,000, from services, appliances and other fees.

Aspire Energy - Increased Margin Driven by Changes in Rates
Gross margin increased by $602,000, due primarily to changes in customer rates on various dates during 2018.

Wholesale Propane Margins
Gross margin increased by $287,000, in 2018 due to a higher realized margin per gallon and an increase in volumes delivered for 
the Mid-Atlantic propane operations.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 34

PESCO

For the Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
Gross margin
Depreciation, amortization and
property taxes

Other operating expenses
Operating Income

2018

2017

(decrease)

2017

2016

(decrease)

Increase

Increase

$

6,601

$

2,212

$

4,389

$

2,212

$

4,630

$

(2,418)

604
7,418
(1,421) $

206
5,150
(3,144) $

$

398
2,268
1,723

$

206
5,150
(3,144) $

18
2,746
1,866

$

188
2,404
(5,010)

In 2018, PESCO's gross margin increased by $4.4 million compared to 2017. Higher gross margin in 2018 from PESCO resulted 
from the following:

(in thousands)

Net impact of PESCO's MTM activity
Net impact of extraordinary costs associated with the 2018 Bomb Cyclone for the Mid-Atlantic wholesale portfolio (1)
Loss for the Mid-Atlantic retail portfolio caused by pipeline capacity constraints in January and warm weather in February 
2018 (1)
Other margin for PESCO operations (net)

Total Change in Gross Margin for PESCO in 2018

Margin
Impact

$

10,423

(3,284)

(2,261)

(489)

4,389

$

(1) The 2018 Bomb Cyclone refers to the high-intensity winter storms in early January 2018 that impacted the Mid-Atlantic region and which had a residual 
impact on our businesses through the month of February.   The exceedingly high demand and associated impacts on pipeline capacity and gas supply in the 
Mid-Atlantic region created significant, unusual costs for PESCO. While such concerted impacts are not expected to occur frequently, our management 
revisited and refined its risk management strategies and implemented additional controls.

Other Operating Expenses

Other operating expenses increased by $7.0 million in 2018 compared to 2017.  The significant components of the increase in 
operating expenses included:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

$2.7 million in higher expenses as a result of increased staffing, infrastructure and risk management system costs to 
ensure the appropriate infrastructure is in place as PESCO executes its growth strategy;

$1.9 million in higher payroll expense for additional personnel to support growth and increased deliveries driven by the 
colder weather in 2018 compared to 2017;

$953,000 in higher facilities maintenance costs as a result of ongoing compliance activities;

$597,000 in higher depreciation, amortization and property tax expense due to increased investments; and

$586,000 in other employee-related costs. 

2017 Compared to 2016

Operating income for the Unregulated Energy segment for 2017 was $12.6 million, a decrease of $1.4 million compared to 2016. 
The decreased operating income was due to an increase in gross margin of $7.6 million, which was offset by an increase of $9.0 
million in other operating expenses. Gross margin and operating income, excluding the impact of the unrealized MTM loss on 
energy-related derivatives, grew by $13.4 million, or 20.6 percent, and $4.3 million, or 30.9 percent, respectively, during 2017, 
compared to 2016.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 35

 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross Margin

Items contributing to the year-over-year increase in gross margin are listed in the following table:

(in thousands)
PESCO - unrealized MTM loss
Eight Flags' CHP plant
PESCO - margin from operations
Customer consumption - weather and other
Pricing amendments to Aspire Energy's long-term sales agreements
Higher wholesale propane sales and margins
Wind-down of Xeron operations
Improved retail propane margins
Other
Year-over-year increase in gross margin

Margin Impact
(5,783)
$
4,365
3,365
2,144
1,125
678
658
645
413
7,610

$

The following is a narrative discussion of the significant items in the foregoing table, which we believe is necessary to understand 
the information disclosed in the table.

Natural Gas Marketing - PESCO
PESCO's gross margin decreased by $2.4 million due primarily to $5.8 million in the unrealized MTM loss related to PESCO's 
financial derivatives contracts that were valued at the end of the year; offset by $3.4 million in additional gross margin generated 
primarily from: (a) providing natural gas to end users within one customer pool pursuant to a supplier agreement with Columbia 
Gas of Ohio, which expired on March 31, 2017, and (b) an increase in commercial and industrial customers served in Florida. 

Eight Flags
Eight Flags' CHP plant generated $4.4 million in additional gross margin in 2017 during its first full year of operations. 

Customer Consumption - Weather and Other
Gross margin increased by $2.1 million due to higher, non-weather related sales volumes for our propane operations, increased 
weather driven demand at Aspire Energy and for our Mid-Atlantic propane operations in the fourth quarter and for our Florida 
propane operations during the third quarter of 2017.

Pricing Amendments to Aspire Energy's Long-Term Agreements
An increase in gross margin of $1.1 million due to favorable pricing amendments to several long-term sales agreements.  

Wholesale Propane Sales and Margins
Gross margin increased by $678,000, due primarily to increased volumes and favorable supply management activities for the Mid-
Atlantic propane operations, as well as higher margins in Florida.

Wind-down of Xeron operations
The absence of the prior year operating loss from Xeron increased gross margin by $658,000.

Retail Propane Margins
Gross margin increased by $645,000, due primarily to favorable supply management activities and market conditions.

Other Operating Expenses

Other  operating  expenses  increased  by  $9.0  million. The  significant  components  of  the  increase  in  other  operating  expenses 
included:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

$2.9 million in higher operating expenses by Eight Flags' CHP plant in support of the margin generated;

$2.9 million in higher payroll costs for additional personnel to support growth;

$1.0 million in higher depreciation expense, of which $476,000 relates to lower depreciation recorded in 2016 as a result 
of the final accounting for the acquisition of Aspire Energy;

$1.0 million in higher benefits and employee-related costs in 2017; and 

$594,000 in higher taxes, other than property and income taxes.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 36

OTHER EXPENSE, NET
Other expense, net for 2018 was $615,000, and was $2.3 million for both 2017 and 2016. Other expense, net includes non-operating 
investment income (expense), interest income, late fees charged to customers, gains or losses from the sale of assets for our 
unregulated business and pension and other benefits expense. The decrease in other expense, net in 2018 was due to a decrease 
in pension expenses when compared to 2017 and the absence of a lease termination payment which occurred in 2017. 

INTEREST CHARGES

2018 Compared to 2017
Interest charges for 2018 increased by approximately $3.8 million, compared to 2017. The increase is attributable $3.3 million in 
additional interest due to higher short-term borrowings and higher short-term interest rates as well as $1.5 million in additional 
interest on long-term debt, largely as a result of the issuance of the Prudential Shelf Notes in April 2017 and the NYL Shelf Notes 
(Series A) in May 2018.  These increases were partially offset by allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC") of 
approximately $1.1 million, primarily from Eastern Shore and Peninsula Pipeline.  

2017 Compared to 2016
Interest charges for 2017 increased by approximately $2.0 million compared to 2016. The increase is attributable to $1.3 million 
in additional interest due to higher short-term borrowings and $1.0 million in additional interest on long-term debt, largely as a 
result of the issuance of the Prudential Shelf Notes in April 2017.  The balance of the increase reflects higher interest expense on 
customer deposits. 

INCOME TAXES

2018 Compared to 2017
Income tax expense was $21.0 million for 2018 compared to $14.3 million for 2017.  The increase in income tax expense in 2018 
was due primarily to enactment of the TCJA in 2017, which resulted in a one-time decrease in our deferred income tax expense 
for 2017 by $14.3 million. Our effective income tax rate was 27.1 percent in 2018 compared to 19.8 percent in 2017. Our lower 
effective tax rate in 2017 resulted from the one-time revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities from our Unregulated Energy 
business as a result of the enactment of the TCJA. 

2017 Compared to 2016
Income tax expense was $14.3 million for 2017, compared to $28.3 million in 2016. Our effective tax rate was 19.8 percent in 
2017, compared to 38.8 percent in 2016. The lower tax expense and effective tax rate in 2017 was due primarily to enactment of 
the TCJA in December 2017.   

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Capital expenditures for investments in new or acquired plant and equipment are our largest capital requirements. Our capital 
expenditures were $283.0 million in 2018 (including the purchase of certain assets from Marlin CNG Services and Ohl), $191.1 
million in 2017 (including the purchase of certain assets of ARM) and $169.4 million in 2016. The 2018 capital expenditures also 
includes over $60.0 million of restoration costs associated with repairing damages caused by Hurricane Michael to our electric 
distribution operations’ service territory in Northwest Florida.  

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 37

The following table shows the 2019 capital expenditure budget of $168.2 million by segment and by business line:

(dollars in thousands)
Regulated Energy:

Natural gas distribution
Natural gas transmission
Electric distribution

Total Regulated Energy

Unregulated Energy:
Propane operations
Energy transmission
Other unregulated energy

Total Unregulated Energy

Other:

Corporate and other businesses

Total Other

Total 2019 capital expenditures budget

Budget Capital Expenditures
64,143
$
66,787
5,949
136,879

11,870
8,345
1,416
21,631

9,705
9,705
168,215

$

The 2019 budget, excluding acquisitions, includes: Eastern Shore's Del-Mar Energy Pathway Project, Florida's Palm Beach County 
Western Expansion and other potential pipeline projects, continued expenditures under Florida GRIP, further expansions of our 
natural  gas  distribution  and  transmission  systems,  continued  natural  gas  infrastructure  improvement  activities,  information 
technology systems, new buildings and facilities, and other strategic initiatives and investments.

The capital expenditure projection is subject to continuous review and modification.  Actual capital requirements may vary from 
the above estimates due to a number of factors, including changing economic conditions, customer growth in existing areas, 
regulation, new growth or acquisition opportunities, availability of capital and other factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors. 
Over the last five years, our actual capital expenditures have averaged 98 percent of the initial budgeted capital expenditures for 
those years. 

The timing of capital expenditures can vary based on delays in regulatory approvals, securing environmental approvals and other 
permits. The regulatory application and approval process has lengthened in the past few years, and we expect this trend to continue.

Capital Structure

We are committed to maintaining a sound capital structure and strong credit ratings.  This commitment, along with adequate and 
timely rate relief for our regulated energy operations, is intended to ensure our ability to attract capital from outside sources at a 
reasonable cost, which will benefit our customers, creditors, employees and stockholders.  

Our capitalization as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 follows:

(in thousands)
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
Stockholders’ equity
Total capitalization, excluding short-term borrowings

(in thousands)
Short-term debt
Long-term debt, including current maturities
Stockholders’ equity
Total capitalization, including short-term borrowings

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

316,020
518,439
834,459

38% $
62%
100% $

197,395
486,294
683,689

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

294,458
327,955
518,439
1,140,852

26% $
29%
45%
100% $

250,969
206,816
486,294
944,079

29%
71%
100%

26%
22%
52%
100%

$

$

$

$

Included in the long-term debt balances at December 31, 2018, were capital lease obligations for Sandpiper and Sharp. Sandpiper 
maintains a capacity, supply and operating agreement ($620,000 of current maturities) that expires in May 2019. The capacity 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 38

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
portion of this agreement is accounted for as a capital lease. Our Mid-Atlantic propane operations business unit has entered into 
an agreement to rent property in Anne Arundel County Maryland which it intends to purchase during the first quarter of 2019 
($690,000 of current maturities).

As of December 31, 2018, we had no restrictions on our cash balances. Chesapeake Utilities’ Senior Notes and FPU’s first mortgage 
bonds contain a restriction that limits the payment of dividends or other restricted payments in excess of certain pre-determined 
thresholds. As of December 31, 2018, $242.8 million of our consolidated net income and $118.2 million of FPU’s net income 
were free of such restrictions.

Our target ratio of equity to total capitalization, including short-term borrowings, is between 50 and 60 percent. Including the 
funds expended specifically related to the impact of Hurricane Michael, our equity to total capitalization ratio, including short-
term borrowings, was 45 percent as of December 31, 2018.  Excluding the funds expended for Hurricane Michael restoration 
activities, our equity to total capitalization ratio, including short-term borrowings, would have been approximately 48 percent.    

As described below under “Short-Term Borrowings,” we have a Revolver with borrowing capacity of $150.0 million. To facilitate 
the refinancing of a portion of the short-term borrowings into long-term debt, as appropriate, we also entered into long-term shelf 
agreements for the potential private placement of unsecured senior debt as further described below under the heading “Shelf 
Agreements.”

We will seek to align, as much as feasible, any long-term debt or equity issuance(s) with the commencement of service and 
associated earnings for larger revenue generating capital projects and considering market conditions. 

Shelf Agreements

We have entered into Shelf Agreements with Prudential, MetLife and NYL who are under no obligation to purchase any unsecured 
debt. The proceeds received from the issuances of these shelf notes was used to reduce borrowings under the Revolver and/or 
lines of credit and/or to fund capital expenditures. The Prudential Shelf Agreement totaling $150.0 million was entered in October 
2015 and we issued $70.0 million of 3.25% unsecured debt in April 2017. The Prudential Shelf Agreement was then amended in 
September 2018 to increase the borrowing capacity back to $150.0 million of which Prudential accepted our request to purchase 
our unsecured debt of $100.0 million at an interest rate of 3.98% on or before August 20, 2019.  The NYL Shelf Agreement totaling 
$100.0 million was entered in March 2017 and we issued unsecured debt totaling $100.0 million during 2018. The NYL Shelf 
Agreement was amended in November 2018 to add incremental borrowing capacity of $50.0 million.  As of December 31, 2018, 
we  had  not  requested  that  MetLife  purchase  unsecured  senior  debt  under  the  MetLife  Shelf Agreement. The  following  table 
summarizes our shelf agreements borrowing information at December 31, 2018:

Shelf Agreement
(in thousands)
Prudential Shelf Agreement

MetLife Shelf Agreement

NYL Shelf Agreement
Total

Total
Borrowing
Capacity

Less: Amount
of Debt
Issued

Less:
Unfunded
Commitments

Remaining
Borrowing
Capacity

$

$

220,000

$

150,000

150,000
520,000

$

(70,000) $
—
(100,000)
(170,000) $

(100,000) $

—

—

(100,000) $

50,000

150,000

50,000
250,000

The Shelf Agreements or Shelf Notes set forth certain business covenants to which we are subject when any note is outstanding, 
including covenants that limit or restrict our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to incur indebtedness, or place or permit 
liens and encumbrances on any of our property or the property of our subsidiaries.

Short-Term Borrowings

Our outstanding short-term borrowings at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $294.5 million and $251.0 million, respectively, at 
weighted average interest rates of 3.44 percent and 2.42 percent, respectively.

We utilize bank lines of credit to provide funds for our short-term cash needs to meet seasonal working capital requirements and 
to temporarily fund portions of our capital expenditures program.  As of December 31, 2018, we had five unsecured bank credit 
facilities with four financial institutions totaling $220.0 million in available credit. In addition, we have $150.0 million of additional 
short-term debt capacity available under the Revolver.  The terms of the Revolver are described in further detail below. None of 
the unsecured bank lines of credit requires compensating balances.  

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 39

The $150.0 million Revolver is available through October 8, 2020 and is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit 
Agreement. Borrowings under the Revolver will be used for general corporate purposes, including repayments of short-term 
borrowings, working capital requirements and capital expenditures. Borrowings under the Revolver will bear interest at: (i) the 
LIBOR Rate plus an applicable margin of 1.25 percent or less, with such margin based on total indebtedness as a percentage of 
total capitalization, both as defined by the Credit Agreement, or (ii) the base rate plus 0.25 percent or less. Interest is payable 
quarterly, and the Revolver is subject to a commitment fee on the unused portion of the facility. We have the right, under certain 
circumstances, to extend the expiration date for up to two years on any anniversary date of the Revolver, with such extension 
subject to the Lenders' approval. We may also request the Lenders to increase the Revolver to $200.0 million, with any increase 
at the sole discretion of each Lender.

Our outstanding short-term borrowings at December 31, 2018 and 2017 included $4.4 million and $10.3 million, respectively, of 
book overdrafts, which are not actual borrowings under the credit facilities but, if presented, would be funded through the credit 
facilities and, therefore, were included in the short-term borrowings. 

Our outstanding borrowings under these unsecured short-term credit facilities at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $290.1 million 
and $240.7 million, respectively. Short-term borrowings were as follows during 2018, 2017 and 2016:

(in thousands)

Average borrowings during the year

Weighted average interest rate for the year
Maximum month-end borrowings

2018

238,750

2.93%

290,103

$

$

2017

183,561

2.03%

240,671

$

$

2016

172,808

1.43%

201,311

$

$

As of December 31, 2018, we had issued $7.0 million in letters of credit to various counterparties under the Revolver. Although 
the letters of credit are not included in the outstanding short-term borrowings and we do not anticipate they will be drawn upon 
by the counterparties, the letters of credit reduce the available borrowings under the Revolver.

Cash Flows

The following table provides a summary of our operating, investing and financing cash flows for the years ended December 31, 
2018, 2017 and 2016:

For the Year Ended December 31,
2017

2016

2018

(in thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in):

Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents—end of period

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

$

$

146,778
(286,264)
139,961
475
5,614
6,089

$

$

110,089
(186,895)
78,242
1,436
4,178
5,614

$

$

104,141
(170,037)
67,219
1,323
2,855
4,178

Changes in our cash flows from operating activities are attributable primarily to changes in net income, adjusted for non-cash 
items such as depreciation and changes in deferred income taxes, and changes in working capital. Working capital requirements 
are determined by a variety of factors, including weather, the prices of natural gas, electricity and propane, the timing of customer 
collections, payments for purchases of natural gas, electricity and propane, and deferred fuel cost recoveries.

We normally generate a large portion of our annual net income and related increases in our accounts receivable in the first and 
fourth quarters of each year due to significant volumes of natural gas and propane delivered to customers during the peak heating 
season by our natural gas and propane operations and our natural gas supply, gathering and processing operation to customers 
during the peak heating season. In addition, our natural gas and propane inventories, which usually peak in the fall months, are 
largely drawn down in the heating season and provide a source of cash as the inventory is used to satisfy winter sales demand.

During 2018 and 2017, net cash provided by operating activities was $146.8 million and $110.1 million, respectively, resulting 
in an increase in cash flows of $36.7 million. Significant operating activities generating the cash flows change were as follows:

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 40

 
 
 
•  Changes in net accounts receivable and accrued revenue and accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased cash flows 
by $23.5 million, due primarily to the timing of the receipt of customer payments from increased revenue as well as the 
timing of payments to vendors.

•  Net cash flows from changes in propane inventory, storage gas and other inventories increased by approximately $11.1 

million due primarily to higher levels of our inventory during 2017. 

•  Changes in net prepaid expenses and other current assets, customer deposits and refunds decreased cash flows by $11.7 
million  due  primarily  to  higher  refund  activity  to  customers  associated  with  the  impacts  of  the  TCJA  through  the 
implementation of lower rates. 

•  Cash  flows  from  changes  in  deferred  income  taxes  resulted  in  an  increase  of  $10.1  million  due  primarily  to  timing 
differences associated with depreciation from increased capital expenditures compared to the prior year, offset by $8.6 
million in changes in income taxes payable as a result of the impacts of the TCJA. 

•  Changes in net regulatory assets and liabilities increased cash flows by $5.1 million, due primarily to the change in fuel 

costs collected through the various cost recovery mechanisms.

During 2017 and 2016, net cash provided by operating activities was $110.1 million and $104.1 million, respectively, resulting 
in an increase in cash flows of $6.0 million. Significant operating activities generating the cash flow change were as follows:

•  Net income, adjusted for reconciling activities, decreased cash flows by $485,000. Key reconciling items included:  the 
revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities of our unregulated businesses as a result of the implementation of the 
TCJA, which decreased our deferred tax expense by $14.3 million, higher non-cash adjustments for depreciation and 
amortization related to increased investing activities and realized losses on sales of assets.

•  Net cash flows from changes in other inventories decreased by approximately $6.5 million, due primarily to purchases 

of additional pipes and other construction inventory as a result of the large expansion projects then underway.

•  Changes in income taxes receivable increased cash flows by $5.6 million, due to higher tax refunds as a result of increased 

tax deductions associated with bonus depreciation.  

•  Changes in net regulatory assets and liabilities increased cash flows by $4.7 million, due primarily to the change in fuel 

costs collected through the various cost recovery mechanisms and GRIP.

•  Changes in net accounts receivable, accrued revenue, accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased cash flows by 

$3.5 million, due primarily to higher revenues and the timing of customer payments and payments to vendors. 

•  Changes in net prepaid expenses and other current assets and customer deposits and refunds decreased cash flows by 

$2.2 million.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $286.3 million and $186.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 and 
2017, respectively, resulting in a decrease in cash flows of $99.4 million.  Key investing activities contributing to the cash flow 
change included:

•  Cash paid for capital expenditures increased by $94.4 million due in part to the costs associated with restoring equipment 

and service to customers following Hurricane Michael in Florida. 

•  Net cash of $16.7 million was used to acquire operating assets of Ohl and Marlin CNG Services. 

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $186.9 million and $170.0 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in a 
decrease in cash flows of $16.9 million in 2017. Key investing activities contributing to the cash flow change included:

•  Cash paid for capital expenditures increased by $5.4 million to $175.3 million for 2017.

•  Net cash of $11.9 million was used to acquire assets in various transactions during 2017, including ARM, Chipola and 

Central Gas; there were no corresponding transactions in 2016. 

Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $140.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to net cash of 
$78.2 million provided by financing activities during the prior year resulted in an increase in cash flows of $61.7 million, primarily 
due to the following: 

•  Receipt of $154.8 million in net cash proceeds from the Revolver, the Term Note and the issuance of the NYL Shelf 
Notes (Series A) in May and November 2018, respectively, which increased cash flow by $85.0 million during the year 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 41

ended December 31, 2018, compared to the prior year.  For the year ended December 31, 2017, we received $69.8 million
in net proceeds from the issuance of the Prudential Shelf Notes; 

• 

Increased cash flows from lower repayments of short-term borrowing of $10.1 million under our line of credit arrangements 
in 2018;

•  Decreased cash flows of $7.7 million as a result of changes in cash overdrafts in 2018; 

•  Higher repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $34.4 million during the year ended December 31, 

2018, compared to $12.1 million in the prior year; and  

•  Cash dividend payments of $22.0 million in 2018 compared to $19.9 million for 2017.

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $78.2 million and $67.2 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The increase 
in net cash provided by financing activities in 2017 resulted primarily from the following:

• 

$69.8 million in net cash proceeds from the issuance of the Prudential Shelf Notes in 2017, offset by the payment of $3.0 
million in scheduled long-term debt principal and capital lease obligations payments. 

•  Net cash flows decreased by $57.4 million due to the absence of proceeds related to the issuance of common stock during 

the third quarter of 2016.

•  Net borrowing of $39.3 million for 2017, compared to net borrowing of $32.5 million for 2016, increased cash flows by 

$6.8 million. Change in cash overdrafts decreased cash flows by $2.2 million.

•  Cash dividend payments of $19.9 million in 2017 compared to $17.5 million for 2016.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

We have the following contractual obligations and other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2018:

Contractual Obligations

(in thousands)
Long-term debt (1)
Operating leases (2)
Capital leases (2) 
Purchase obligations (3)

Transmission capacity

Storage capacity

Commodities

Electric supply

Unfunded benefits (4)
Funded benefits (5)
Total Contractual Obligations

$

2019

2020-2021

2022-2023

After 2023

Total

Payments Due by Period

$

10,626

$

59,200

$

45,700

$

211,700

$

327,226

2,349

1,310

32,276

1,720

107,713

16,835

597
2,823
176,249

$

3,759

—

53,062

978

18,255

2,675

692
—
138,621

$

3,331

—

5,398

—

39,197

127,634

355

—

2,727

635
—
91,945

$

—

—

1,385

1,421
5,188
352,726

$

14,837

1,310

252,169

3,053

125,968

23,622

3,345
8,011
759,541

(1) This represents principal payments on long-term debt.  See Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 13, Long-Term Debt, for additional 
information. The expected interest payments on long-term debt are $12.9 million, $21.6 million, $17.5 million and $49.8 million, respectively, for the periods 
indicated above. Expected interest payments for all periods total $101.8 million. 
(2) See Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 15, Lease Obligations, for additional information.
(3) See Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 21, Other Commitments and Contingencies, for additional information.
(4) We have recorded long-term liabilities of $3.3 million at December 31, 2018 for unfunded post-employment and post-retirement benefit plans. The amounts 
specified in the table are based on expected payments to current retirees and assume a retirement age of 62 for currently active employees. There are many factors 
that would cause actual payments to differ from these amounts, including early retirement, future health care costs that differ from past experience and discount 
rates implicit in calculations. See Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 17, Employee Benefit Plans, for additional information on the plans. 
(5) We have recorded long-term liabilities of $17.8 million at December 31, 2018 for two qualified, defined benefit pension plans. The assets funding these plans 
are in a separate trust and are not considered assets of ours or included in our balance sheets. The Contractual Obligations table above includes $1.3 million, 
reflecting the payments we expect to make to the trust funds in 2017. Additional contributions may be required in future years based on the actual return earned 
by the plan assets and other actuarial assumptions, such as the discount rate and long-term expected rate of return on plan assets. See Item 8, Financial Statements 
and Supplementary Data, Note 17, Employee Benefit Plans, for further information on the plans. Additionally, the Contractual Obligations table above includes 
deferred compensation obligations totaling $6.7 million, funded with Rabbi Trust assets in the same amount. The Rabbi Trust assets are recorded under Investments 
on the consolidated balance sheets. We assume a retirement age of 65 for purposes of distribution from this account.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 42

 
 
 
 
 
 
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have issued corporate guarantees to certain vendors of our subsidiaries that provide for the payment of propane and natural 
gas purchases in the event of the subsidiary’s default. The liabilities for these purchases are recorded in our financial statements 
when incurred. The aggregate amount guaranteed at December 31, 2018 was $76.5 million, with the guarantees expiring on various 
dates throughout 2019.

We have issued letters of credit totaling $7.0 million related to the electric transmission services for FPU's northwest electric 
division, the firm transportation service agreement between TETLP and our Delaware and Maryland divisions, and to our current 
and previous primary insurance carrier with expiration dates extending through December 2019.  There were no draws on these 
letters of credit as of December 31, 2018. We do not anticipate that the letters of credit will be drawn upon by the counterparties, 
and we expect that the letters of credit will be renewed to the extent necessary in the future. Additional information is presented 
in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 21, Other Commitments and Contingencies in the consolidated 
financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Application of these accounting principles requires the use of 
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of 
contingencies during the reporting period. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are 
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying 
value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Since a significant portion of our businesses are 
regulated and the accounting methods used by these businesses must comply with the requirements of the regulatory bodies, the 
choices available are limited by these regulatory requirements. In the normal course of business, estimated amounts are subsequently 
adjusted to actual results that may differ from the estimates. 

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities

As  a  result  of  the  ratemaking  process,  we  record  certain  assets  and  liabilities  in  accordance  with ASC Topic  980,  Regulated 
Operations, and consequently, the accounting principles applied by our regulated energy businesses differ in certain respects from 
those applied by the unregulated businesses. Amounts are deferred as regulatory assets and liabilities when there is a probable 
expectation that they will be recovered in future revenues or refunded to customers as a result of the regulatory process. This is 
more fully described in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, 
in the consolidated financial statements. If we were required to terminate the application of ASC Topic 980, we would be required 
to recognize all such deferred amounts as a charge or a credit to earnings, net of applicable income taxes. Such an adjustment 
could have a material effect on our results of operations.

Valuation of Environmental Liabilities and Related Regulatory Assets

As more fully described in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 20, Environmental Commitments and 
Contingencies,  in  the  consolidated  financial  statements,  we  are  currently  participating  in  the  investigation,  assessment  or 
remediation of seven former MGP sites for which we have sought or will seek regulatory approval to recover through rates the 
estimated costs of remediation and related activities. Amounts have been recorded as environmental liabilities based on estimates 
of future costs to remediate these sites, which are provided by independent consultants.

Derivative Instruments

We  use  derivative  and  non-derivative  instruments  to  manage  the  risks  related  to  obtaining  adequate  supplies  and  the  price 
fluctuations of natural gas, electricity and propane.  We continually monitor the use of these instruments to ensure compliance 
with our risk management policies and account for them in accordance with GAAP, such that every derivative instrument is 
recorded as either an asset or a liability measured at its fair value. It also requires that changes in the derivatives' fair value are 
recognized in the current period earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If these instruments do not meet the 
definition of derivatives or are considered “normal purchases and normal sales,” they are accounted for on an accrual basis of 
accounting.

Additionally, GAAP also requires us to classify the derivative assets and liabilities based on the lowest level of input that is 
significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement 
requires judgment and may affect the fair value of the assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.

We determined that certain propane put options, call options, swap agreements and natural gas futures contracts met the specific 
hedge accounting criteria. We also determined that most of our contracts for the purchase or sale of natural gas, electricity and 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 43

propane either: (i) did not meet the definition of derivatives because they did not have a minimum purchase/sell requirement, or 
(ii) were considered “normal purchases and normal sales” because the contracts provided for the purchase or sale of natural gas, 
electricity or propane to be delivered in quantities that we expect to use or sell over a reasonable period of time in the normal 
course of business. Accordingly, these contracts were accounted for on an accrual basis of accounting. 

Additional information about our derivative instruments is disclosed in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,
Note 8, Derivative Instruments, in the Consolidated Financial Statements. 

Operating Revenues

Revenues for our natural gas and electric distribution operations are based on rates approved by the PSC of each state in which 
we operate. Customers’ base rates may not be changed without formal approval by these PSCs. However, the PSCs authorized 
our regulated operations to negotiate rates, based on approved methodologies, with customers that have competitive alternatives. 
Eastern Shore’s revenues are based on rates approved by the FERC. The FERC has also authorized Eastern Shore to negotiate 
rates above or below the FERC-approved maximum rates, which customers can elect as an alternative to negotiated rates.

Peninsula Pipeline, our Florida intrastate pipeline subsidiary that is subject to regulation by the Florida PSC, has negotiated firm 
transportation service contracts with third-party customers and with certain affiliates.

For regulated deliveries of natural gas, propane and electricity, we read meters and bill customers on monthly cycles that do not 
coincide  with  the  accounting  periods  used  for  financial  reporting  purposes. We  accrue  unbilled  revenues  for  natural  gas  and 
electricity that have been delivered, but not yet billed, at the end of an accounting period to the extent that they do not coincide. 
We estimate the amount of the unbilled revenue by jurisdiction and customer class. A similar computation is made to accrue 
unbilled  revenues  for  propane  customers  with  meters,  such  as  community  gas  system  customers  and  natural  gas  marketing 
customers, whose billing cycles do not coincide with the accounting periods.

Our natural gas supply operation in Ohio recognizes revenues based on actual volumes of natural gas shipped, using contractual 
rates, which are based upon index prices that are published monthly.

Eight Flags records revenues based on the amount of electricity and steam generated and sold to its customers.

Each of our natural gas distribution operations in Delaware and Maryland, our bundled natural gas distribution service in Florida 
and our electric distribution operation in Florida has a fuel cost recovery mechanism. This mechanism provides a method of 
adjusting billing rates to reflect changes in the cost of purchased fuel. The difference between the current cost of fuel purchased 
and the cost of fuel recovered in billed rates is deferred and accounted for as either unrecovered fuel cost or amounts payable to 
customers. Generally, these deferred amounts are recovered or refunded within one year.

We charge flexible rates to industrial interruptible customers on our natural gas distribution systems to compete with the price of 
alternative fuel that they can use. Neither we, nor any of our interruptible customers, are contractually obligated to deliver or 
receive natural gas on a firm service basis.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

An  allowance  for  doubtful  accounts  is  recorded  against  amounts  due  to  reduce  the  net  receivable  balance  to  the  amount  we 
reasonably expect to collect based upon our collections experience, the condition of the overall economy and our assessment of 
our customers’ inability or reluctance to pay. If circumstances change, however, our estimate of the recoverability of accounts 
receivable may also change. Circumstances which could affect our estimates include, but are not limited to, customer credit issues, 
the level of natural gas, electricity and propane prices and general economic conditions. Accounts are written off once they are 
deemed to be uncollectible.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

We test goodwill for impairment at least annually in December. The annual impairment testing for 2018 indicated no impairment 
of goodwill. Additional information is presented in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 11, Goodwill and 
Other Intangible Assets, in the consolidated financial statements.

Other Assets Impairment Evaluations 

We  periodically  evaluate  whether  events  or  circumstances  have  occurred  which  indicate  that  long-lived  assets  may  not  be 
recoverable. When events or circumstances indicate that an impairment is present, we record an impairment loss equal to the 
excess of the asset's carrying value over its fair value, if any. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 44

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

Pension and other postretirement plan costs and liabilities are determined on an actuarial basis and are affected by numerous 
assumptions and estimates including the market value of plan assets, estimates of the expected returns on plan assets, assumed 
discount rates, the level of contributions made to the plans, and current demographic and actuarial mortality data. The assumed 
discount rates and the expected returns on plan assets are the assumptions that generally have the most significant impact on the 
pension costs and liabilities. The assumed discount rates, the assumed health care cost trend rates and the assumed rates of retirement 
generally have the most significant impact on our postretirement plan costs and liabilities. Additional information is presented in
Item 8,  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 17, Employee Benefit Plans, in the consolidated financial statements, 
including  plan  asset  investment  allocation,  estimated  future  benefit  payments,  general  descriptions  of  the  plans,  significant 
assumptions, the impact of certain changes in assumptions, and significant changes in estimates.

For 2018, actuarial assumptions include expected long-term rates of return on plan assets of 6.00 percent and 6.50 percent for 
Chesapeake Utilities' pension plan and FPU’s pension plan, respectively, and discount rates of 3.50 percent and 3.75 percent for 
Chesapeake Utilities' and FPU’s plans, respectively. The discount rate for each plan was determined by management considering 
high-quality corporate bond rates, such as the Prudential curve index and the Citigroup yield curve, changes in those rates from 
the prior year and other pertinent factors, including the expected lives of the plans and the availability of the lump-sum payment 
option. A 0.25 percent decrease in the discount rate could increase our annual pension and postretirement costs by approximately 
$20,000, and a 0.25 percent increase could decrease our annual pension and postretirement costs by approximately $20,000.

Actual changes in the fair value of plan assets and the differences between the actual return on plan assets and the expected return 
on plan assets could have a material effect on the amount of pension benefit costs that we ultimately recognize. A 0.25 percent 
change in the rate of return could change our annual pension cost by approximately $128,000 and would not have an impact on 
the postretirement and Chesapeake SERP because these plans are not funded. 

Tax-Related Contingency

We account for uncertainty in income taxes in the consolidated financial statements only if it is more likely than not that an 
uncertain tax position is sustainable based on its technical merits. Recognizable tax positions are then measured to determine the 
amount of benefit recognized in the consolidated financial statements. We recognize penalties and interest related to unrecognized 
tax benefits as a component of other income.

We account for contingencies associated with taxes other than income when the likelihood of a loss is both probable and quantifiable. 
In assessing the likelihood of a loss, we do not consider the existence of current inquiries, or the likelihood of future inquiries, by 
tax authorities as a factor. Our assessment is based solely on our application of the appropriate statutes and the likelihood of a 
loss, assuming the proper inquiries are made by tax authorities.

 ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

INTEREST RATE RISK

Long-term debt is subject to potential losses based on changes in interest rates. Additional information about our long-term debt 
is disclosed in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 13, Long-term Debt, in the consolidated financial 
statements. 

COMMODITY PRICE RISK

Regulated Energy Segment

We have entered into agreements with various wholesale suppliers to purchase natural gas and electricity for resale to our customers. 
Our  regulated  energy  distribution  businesses  that  sell  natural  gas  or  electricity  to  end-use  customers  have  fuel  cost  recovery 
mechanisms authorized by the PSCs that allow us to recover all of the costs prudently incurred in purchasing natural gas and 
electricity for our customers. Therefore, our regulated energy distribution operations have limited commodity price risk exposure.

Unregulated Energy Segment

Our propane operations are exposed to commodity price risk as a result of the competitive nature of retail pricing offered to our 
customers. In order to mitigate this risk, we utilize propane storage activities and forward contracts for supply. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 45

We can store up to approximately 7.1 million gallons of propane (including leased storage and rail cars) during the winter season 
to serve our customers.  Decreases in wholesale propane prices may cause the value of stored propane to decline, particularly if 
we utilize fixed price forward contracts for supply. To mitigate this risk, we have implemented a Risk Management Policy that 
allows our propane operation to enter into fair value hedges, cash flows hedges or other economic hedges of our inventory. 

Aspire Energy is exposed to commodity price risk, primarily during the winter season, to the extent we are not successful in 
balancing our natural gas purchases and sales and have to secure natural gas from alternative sources at higher spot prices. In order 
to mitigate this risk, we procure firm capacity that meets our estimated volume requirements and we continue to seek out new 
producers to fulfill our natural gas purchase requirements.

PESCO is a party to natural gas swap and futures contracts, which provide us the right to purchase natural gas at a fixed price at 
future dates. Upon expiration, the contracts can be settled financially without taking delivery of natural gas, or PESCO can procure 
natural gas and deliver it to its customers. PESCO is subject to commodity price risk on its open positions to the extent that market 
prices for natural gas liquids and natural gas deviate from fixed contract settlement prices. Market risk associated with the trading 
of futures and forward contracts is monitored daily for compliance with our Risk Management Policy, which includes volumetric 
limits for open positions. To manage exposures to changing market prices, open positions are marked up or down to market prices 
and reviewed daily by our oversight officials. In addition, the Risk Management Committee reviews periodic reports on markets, 
approves any exceptions to the Risk Management Policy (within limits established by the Board of Directors) and authorizes the 
use of any new types of contracts.

The following table reflects the changes in the fair market value of financial derivatives contracts related to natural gas and propane 
purchases and sales from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018:

(in thousands)

PESCO

Sharp

Total

Balance at
December 31, 2017

Increase
(Decrease) in Fair
Market Value

Less Amounts
Settled

$

$

(6,153) $

1,192

(4,961) $

16,674
(3,376)
13,298

$

$

 Balance at
December 31, 2018
(184)
(1,521)
(1,705)

(10,705) $
663
(10,042) $

There were no changes in the methods of valuations during the year ended December 31, 2018.

The following is a summary of fair market value of financial derivatives as of December 31, 2018, by method of valuation and 
by maturity for each fiscal year period. 

(in thousands)
Price based on ICE(1)  PESCO
Price based on Mont Belvieu - Sharp

Total

2019

2020

2021

2022

Total Fair Value

$

$

(2,075)

(1,229)

(3,304)

$

$

1,817
(250)
1,567

$

$

72
(42)
30

$

$

2

—

2

$

$

(184)
(1,521)
(1,705)

(1) Intercontinental Exchange (an electronic trading platform)

WHOLESALE CREDIT RISK

The Risk Management Committee reviews credit risks associated with counterparties to commodity derivative contracts prior 
to such contracts being approved.

Additional information about our derivative instruments is disclosed in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,
Note 8, Derivative Instruments, in the Consolidated Financial Statements. 

INFLATION

Inflation affects the cost of supply, labor, products and services required for operations, maintenance and capital improvements. 
To help cope with the effects of inflation on our capital investments and returns, we periodically seek rate increases from regulatory 
commissions  for  our  regulated  operations  and  closely  monitor  the  returns  of  our  unregulated  energy  business  operations. To 
compensate for fluctuations in propane gas prices, we adjust propane sales prices to the extent allowed by the market.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 46

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation

Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Chesapeake  Utilities  Corporation  and  Subsidiaries  (the 
"Company")  as  of  December  31,  2018  and  2017,  the  related  consolidated  statements  of  income,  comprehensive  income, 
stockholders' equity, and cash flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes 
and financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)2 (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). We also 
have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in 
Internal  Control  -  Integrated  Framework:  (2013)  issued  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway 
Commission (“COSO”).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company 
as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year 
period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 
Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of 
December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control 
over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the 
accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion 
on the Company's consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting 
based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United 
States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities 
laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the 
audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether 
due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. 

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement 
of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. 
Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial 
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, 
as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial 
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness 
exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits 
also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits 
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability 
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted 
accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain 
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets 
of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial 
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are 
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable 
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that 
could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 47

 
 
Because  of  its  inherent  limitations,  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  may  not  prevent  or  detect  misstatements. Also, 
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because 
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2007.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 26, 2019 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 48

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

(in thousands, except shares and per share data)
Operating Revenues
Regulated Energy
Unregulated Energy
Other businesses and eliminations
Total operating revenues

Operating Expenses

Regulated Energy cost of sales
Unregulated Energy and other cost of sales
Operations
Maintenance
Gain from a settlement
Depreciation and amortization
Other taxes

       Total operating expenses
Operating Income
Other expense, net
Interest charges
Income Before Income Taxes
Income taxes
Net Income

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:

Basic
Diluted

Earnings Per Share of Common Stock:

Basic
Diluted

Cash Dividends Declared Per Share of Common Stock

For the Year Ended December 31,
2017
2018

2016

$

$

$
$
$

$

345,281
420,617
(48,409)
717,489

$

326,310
324,595
(33,322)
617,583

121,828
288,913
138,441
14,387
(130)
40,802
18,628
622,869
94,620
(615)
16,431
77,574
20,994
56,580

16,369,616
16,419,870

3.46
3.45
1.4350

118,769
219,145
125,994
12,701
(130)
36,599
17,085
530,163
87,420
(2,342)
12,645
72,433
14,309
58,124

16,336,789
16,383,352

3.56
3.55
1.2800

$

$
$
$

$

$
$
$

305,689
203,778
(10,607)
498,860

109,609
128,434
115,684
12,391
(130)
32,159
14,730
412,877
85,983
(2,328)
10,639
73,016
28,341
44,675

15,570,539
15,613,091

2.87
2.86
1.2025

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 49

 
 
 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(in thousands)
Net Income
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax:

Employee Benefits, net of tax:

For the Year Ended December 31,
2017
2018

2016

$

56,580

$

58,124

$

44,675

Amortization of prior service cost, net of tax of $(22), $(31) and
$(29), respectively

Net (loss)/gain, net of tax of $(49), $432, and $178, respectively

  Cash Flow Hedges, net of tax:

 Unrealized (loss)/gain on commodity contract cash flow hedges, net
of tax of $(555), $(8) and $496, respectively

Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive Income

(55)
(108)

(1,371)
(1,534)
55,046

$

(46)
663

(11)
606

(48)
268

742

962

$

58,730

$

45,637

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 50

 
 
 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Assets
(in thousands, except shares and per share data)
Property, Plant and Equipment

Regulated Energy
Unregulated Energy
Other businesses and eliminations

Total property, plant and equipment
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
Plus: Construction work in progress
Net property, plant and equipment
Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable (less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $1,108 and
$936, respectively)

Accrued revenue
Propane inventory, at average cost
Other inventory, at average cost
Regulatory assets
Storage gas prepayments
Income taxes receivable
Prepaid expenses
Derivative assets, at fair value
Other current assets

Total current assets
Deferred Charges and Other Assets

Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
Investments, at fair value
Regulatory assets
Receivables and other deferred charges

Total deferred charges and other assets
Total Assets

As of December 31,

2018

2017

$

1,297,416
237,682
34,585
1,569,683
(294,295)
108,584
1,383,972

1,073,736
210,682
27,699
1,312,117
(270,599)
84,509
1,126,027

6,089

5,614

85,404
27,499
9,791
7,127
4,796
6,603
15,300
10,079
13,165
5,684
191,537

25,837
6,207
6,711
72,422
6,985
118,162
1,693,671

$

77,223
22,279
8,324
12,022
10,930
5,250
14,778
13,621
1,286
7,260
178,587

19,604
4,686
6,756
75,575
3,699
110,320
1,414,934

$

$

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 51

 
 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Capitalization and Liabilities
(in thousands, except shares and per share data)
Capitalization

Stockholders’ equity

Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (authorized 2,000,000 shares), no
shares issued and outstanding

Common stock, par value $0.4867 per share (authorized 50,000,000 shares)
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Deferred compensation obligation
Treasury stock

Total stockholders’ equity
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
Total capitalization
Current Liabilities

Current portion of long-term debt
Short-term borrowing
Accounts payable
Customer deposits and refunds
Accrued interest
Dividends payable
Accrued compensation
Regulatory liabilities
Derivative liabilities, at fair value
Other accrued liabilities

Total current liabilities
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities

Deferred income taxes
Regulatory liabilities
Environmental liabilities
Other pension and benefit costs
Deferred investment tax credits and other liabilities

Total deferred credits and other liabilities
Environmental and other commitments and contingencies (Note 20 and 21)
Total Capitalization and Liabilities

As of December 31,

2018

2017

$

— $

7,971
255,651
261,530
(6,713)
3,854
(3,854)
518,439
316,020
834,459

11,935
294,458
129,804
34,155
2,317
6,060
13,923
7,883
14,871
12,828
528,234

156,820
135,039
7,638
28,513
2,968
330,978

—
7,955
253,470
229,141
(4,272)
3,395
(3,395)
486,294
197,395
683,689

9,421
250,969
74,688
34,751
1,742
5,312
13,112
6,485
6,247
10,273
413,000

135,850
140,978
8,263
29,699
3,455
318,245

$

1,693,671

$

1,414,934

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 52

 
 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended December 31,
2017

2016

2018

$

56,580

$

58,124

$

44,675

40,802
8,535
21,226
5,497
429
856
2,813
—

(16,311)
2,107
2,250
(7,421)
35,907
(522)
(596)
708
(6,082)
146,778

(269,767)
782
(16,654)
(625)
(286,264)

(22,043)
(706)
—
(1,210)
(5,943)
49,432
154,819
(34,388)
139,961
475
5,614
6,089

$

36,599
8,122
11,085
3,179
(1,001)
1,577
2,490
(750)

(19,506)
(9,036)
(2,855)
(7,001)
15,596
8,110
5,513
2,488
(2,645)
110,089

(175,329)
708
(11,945)
(329)
(186,895)

(19,928)
89
(10)
(692)
1,738
39,338
69,807
(12,100)
78,242
1,436
4,178
5,614

$

32,159
7,334
31,257
695
(385)
1,887
2,367
(79)

(27,013)
(2,531)
(7,523)
(1,387)
19,599
2,466
2,065
358
(1,803)
104,141

(169,861)
174
—
(350)
(170,037)

(17,482)
811
57,360
(770)
3,920
32,526
—
(9,146)
67,219
1,323
2,855
4,178

(in thousands)
Operating Activities
Net Income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net operating cash:

Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and accretion included in operations expenses
Deferred income taxes, net
Realized loss on sale of assets/investments/commodity contracts
Unrealized loss (gain) on investments/commodity contracts
Employee benefits and compensation
Share-based compensation
Other, net

Changes in assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable and accrued revenue
Propane inventory, storage gas and other inventory
Regulatory assets/liabilities, net
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
Income taxes receivable (payable)
Customer deposits and refunds
Accrued compensation
Other assets and liabilities, net
Net cash provided by operating activities
Investing Activities

Property, plant and equipment expenditures
Proceeds from sale of assets
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Environmental expenditures
Net cash used in investing activities
Financing Activities

Common stock dividends
Issuance of stock for Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of expenses
Tax withholding payments related to net settled stock compensation
Change in cash overdrafts due to outstanding checks
Net borrowing under line of credit agreements

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
Repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligation

Net cash provided by financing activities
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents — Beginning of Period
Cash and Cash Equivalents — End of Period

Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures (see Note 7) 

$

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 53

 
 
 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

Common Stock (1)

(in thousands, except shares and per share data)

Number
of
Shares(2)

Par
Value

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

Retained
Earnings

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

Deferred
Compensation

Treasury
Stock

Total

Balance at December 31, 2015

15,270,659

$

7,432

$

190,311

$

166,235

$

(5,840)

$

1,883

$

(1,883)

$

358,138

Net Income

Other comprehensive loss

Dividends declared ($1.2025 per share)

Retirement savings plan and dividend
reinvestment plan
Stock issuance (3)
Share-based compensation and tax benefit (4) (5)
Treasury stock activities(2)

—

—

—

36,253

960,488

36,099

—

—

—

—

17

467

19

—

—

—

—

2,225

56,893

1,538

—

Balance at December 31, 2016

16,303,499

7,935

250,967

Net Income

Other comprehensive income

Dividends declared ($1.2800 per share)

Retirement savings plan and dividend
reinvestment plan
Stock issuance (3)
Share-based compensation and tax benefit (4) (5)
Treasury stock activities(2)

—

—

—

10,771

—

30,172

—

—

—

—

5

—

15

—

—

—

—

730

(10)

1,783

—

Balance at December 31, 2017

16,344,442

7,955

253,470

Net Income

Cumulative effect of the adoption of ASU
2014-09

Reclassification upon the adoption of ASU
2018-02

Other comprehensive income

Dividends declared ($1.4350 per share)

Dividend reinvestment plan
Share-based compensation and tax benefit (4) (5)
Treasury stock activities(2)

—

—

—

—

—

—

34,103

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

16

—

—

—

—

—

—

(3)

2,184

—

44,675

—

(18,848)

—

—

—

—

192,062

58,124

—

(21,045)

—

—

—

—

229,141

56,580

(1,498)

907

—

(23,600)

—

—

—

—

962

—

—

—

—

—

(4,878)

—

606

—

—

—

—

—

(4,272)

—

—

(907)

(1,534)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

533

2,416

(533)

(2,416)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

979

3,395

(979)

(3,395)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

459

(459)

44,675

962

(18,848)

2,242

57,360

1,557

—

446,086

58,124

606

(21,045)

735

(10)

1,798

—

486,294

56,580

(1,498)

—

(1,534)

(23,600)

(3)

2,200

—

Balance at December 31, 2018

16,378,545

$

7,971

$

255,651

$

261,530

$

(6,713)

$

3,854

$

(3,854)

$

518,439

(1)  2,000,000 shares of preferred stock at $0.01 par value per share have been authorized. No shares have been issued or are outstanding; accordingly, no information has 
been included in the Statements of Stockholders’ Equity. Shares of preferred stock may be issued from time to time, by authorization of our Board of Directors and at their 
discretion.
(2) Includes 97,053, 90,961 and 76,745 shares at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, held in a Rabbi Trust related to our Non-Qualified Deferred 
Compensation Plan.
(3) On September 22, 2016, we completed a public offering of 960,488 shares of our common stock at a price per share of $62.26. The net proceeds from the sale of common 
stock, after deducting underwriting commissions and expenses, were approximately $57.4 million. 
(4) Includes amounts for shares issued for directors’ compensation.

(5) The shares issued under the SICP are net of shares withheld for employee taxes. For 2018, 2017 and 2016, we withheld 10,436, 10,269 and 12,031 shares, respectively, 
for taxes.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 54

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Chesapeake Utilities, incorporated in 1947 in Delaware, is a diversified energy company engaged in regulated and unregulated 
energy businesses.

Our regulated energy businesses consist of: (a) regulated natural gas distribution operations in central and southern Delaware, 
Maryland’s eastern shore and Florida; (b) regulated natural gas transmission operations on the Delmarva Peninsula, in Pennsylvania 
and in Florida; and (c) regulated electric distribution operations serving customers in northeast and northwest Florida. 

Our unregulated energy businesses primarily include: (a) propane operations in the Mid-Atlantic region and Florida; (b) our natural 
gas  marketing  operation  providing  natural  gas  supply  directly  to  commercial  and  industrial  customers  in  Florida,  Delaware, 
Maryland, Pennsylvania, Ohio and other states; (c) our unregulated natural gas transmission/supply operation in central and eastern 
Ohio; (d) our CHP plant in Florida that generates electricity and steam; and (e) our newest subsidiary, based in Florida, that provides 
mobile  compressed  natural  gas  ("CNG")  utility  and  pipeline  solutions  to  commercial,  industrial  and  other  utility  customers 
throughout the Southeast and Midwest portions of the country. 

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Chesapeake Utilities and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. We do not 
have any ownership interest in investments accounted for using the equity method or any interest in a variable interest entity. All 
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. We have assessed and, if applicable, reported on 
subsequent events through the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements.

We reclassified certain amounts in the consolidated statement of income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 to 
conform to the current year’s presentation.   

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates in 
measuring  assets  and  liabilities  and  related  revenues  and  expenses.  These  estimates  involve  judgments  about  various  future 
economic factors that are difficult to predict and are beyond our control; therefore, actual results could differ from these estimates. 
As additional information becomes available, or actual amounts are determined, recorded estimates are revised. Consequently, 
operating results can be affected by revisions to prior accounting estimates. 

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at original cost less accumulated depreciation or fair value, if impaired. Costs include 
direct labor, materials and third-party construction contractor costs, allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"), 
and certain indirect costs related to equipment and employees engaged in construction. The costs of repairs and minor replacements 
are charged to expense as incurred, and the costs of major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Upon retirement or disposition 
of property within the regulated businesses, the gain or loss, net of salvage value, is charged to accumulated depreciation. Upon 
retirement or disposition of property owned by the unregulated businesses, the gain or loss, net of salvage value, is charged to 
income.  A summary of property, plant and equipment by classification as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is provided in the 
following table: 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 55

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)
Property, plant and equipment

Regulated Energy

Natural gas distribution - Delmarva Peninsula and Florida

Natural gas transmission - Delmarva Peninsula, Pennsylvania and Florida

Electric distribution – Florida

Unregulated Energy

Propane operations – Mid-Atlantic and Florida

Natural gas transmission – Ohio

Electricity and Steam generation – Florida

Mobile CNG utility and pipeline solutions

Other unregulated energy

Other

Total property, plant and equipment

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

Plus: Construction work in progress

Net property, plant and equipment

Contributions or Advances in Aid of Construction

As of December 31,

2018

2017

$

657,630

$

537,654

102,133

589,149

384,360

100,227

123,632

108,177

70,225

35,239

7,240

1,346

34,584

1,569,683
(294,295)
108,584

66,037

35,239

—

1,229

27,699
1,312,117
(270,599)
84,509

$

1,383,972

$

1,126,027

Customer contributions or advances in aid of construction reduce property, plant and equipment, unless the amounts are refundable 
to customers. Contributions or advances may be refundable to customers after a number of years based on the amount of revenues 
generated from the customers or the duration of the service provided to the customers. Refundable contributions or advances are 
recorded initially as liabilities. Non-refundable contributions reduce property, plant and equipment at the time of such determination. 
As of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the non-refundable contributions totaled $2.8 million, $2.1 million and $1.0 million, 
respectively.

AFUDC

Some of the additions to our regulated property, plant and equipment include AFUDC, which represents the estimated cost of 
funds, from both debt and equity sources, used to finance the construction of major projects. AFUDC is capitalized in the applicable 
rate base for ratemaking purposes when the completed projects are placed in service. During the year ended December 31, 2018, 
AFUDC totaled $1.9 million, which was reflected as a reduction of interest charges.  During the years ended December 31, 2017
and 2016, AFUDC was not material.

Assets Used in Leases

Property, plant and equipment for the Florida natural gas transmission operation included $1.4 million of assets, at December 31, 
2018 and 2017, consisting primarily of mains, measuring equipment and regulation station equipment used by Peninsula Pipeline 
to provide natural gas transmission service pursuant to a contract with a third party. This contract is accounted for as an operating 
lease due to the exclusive use of the assets by the customer. The service under this contract commenced in January 2009 and 
generates $264,000 in annual revenue for a 20-year term. Accumulated depreciation for these assets totaled $720,000 and $652,000
at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Capital Lease Assets

Property, plant and equipment include capital lease assets related to: (i) a lease arrangement entered into by our Delmarva Peninsula 
natural gas distribution operation associated with Sandpiper's capacity, supply and operating agreement and (ii) our Mid-Atlantic 
propane operation's lease arrangement for  property in Anne Arundel County Maryland which it intends to purchase during the 
first quarter of 2019.  Information regarding the impact of the capital leases in our financial statements is shown below. Additional 
information can be found in Note 21, Other Commitments and Contingencies. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 56

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)

Fair value of asset at lease inception

Less: Accumulated amortization

Capital lease asset

(in thousands)

Amortization included in fuel cost recovery mechanism

Jointly-owned Pipeline

As of December 31,

2018

2017

$

$

7,816

6,506

1,310

$

$

7,126

5,056

2,070

For the years ended December 31,

2018

$1,451

2017

$1,401

2016

$1,353

Property,  plant  and  equipment  for  our  Florida  natural  gas  transmission  operation  also  included  $6.7  million  of  assets,  at 
December 31, 2018 and 2017, which consist of the 16-mile pipeline from the Duval/Nassau County line to Amelia Island in Nassau 
County, Florida, jointly owned with Peoples Gas. The amount included in property, plant and equipment represents Peninsula 
Pipeline’s 45-percent ownership of this pipeline.  Peninsula Pipeline's share of direct expenses for the jointly-owned pipeline are 
included in the operating expenses of the income statement. Accumulated depreciation for this pipeline totaled $1.4 million and 
$1.3 million, at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Asset Impairment Evaluations

We periodically evaluate whether events or circumstances have occurred, which indicate that other long-lived assets may not be 
fully recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash 
flows attributable to the asset, compared to the carrying value of the asset. When such events or circumstances are present, we 
record an impairment loss equal to the excess of the asset's carrying value over its fair value, if any. 

In May 2016, we received $650,000 in cash pursuant to a settlement agreement with a vendor related to implementation of a 
customer billing system which is reflected as "Gain from a settlement" in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. 
The retention of this amount is contingent upon engaging this vendor to provide agreed-upon services through May 2020. 

Depreciation and Accretion Included in Operations Expenses

We compute depreciation expense for our regulated operations by applying composite, annual rates, as approved by the respective 
regulatory bodies. The following table shows the average depreciation rates used for regulated operations during the years ended 
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:

Natural gas distribution – Delmarva Peninsula
Natural gas distribution – Florida
Natural gas transmission – Delmarva Peninsula
Natural gas transmission – Florida
Electric distribution – Florida

2018
2.5%
2.9%
2.7%
2.3%
3.4%

2017
2.5%
2.9%
2.8%
3.5%
3.4%

2016
2.5%
2.9%
2.7%
3.9%
3.5%

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 57

For our unregulated operations, we compute depreciation expense on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives 
of the assets:  

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Asset Description
Propane distribution mains
Propane bulk plants and tanks
Propane equipment, meters and meter installations
Measuring and regulating station equipment
Natural gas pipelines
Natural gas right of ways
CHP plant
Natural gas processing equipment
Office furniture and equipment
Transportation equipment
Structures and improvements
Other

Useful Life
10-37 years
10-40 years
5-33 years
5-37 years
45 years
Perpetual
30 years
20-25 years
3-10 years
4-20 years
5-45 years
Various

We report certain depreciation and accretion in operations expense, rather than as a depreciation and amortization expense, in the 
accompanying consolidated statements of income in accordance with industry practice and regulatory requirements. Depreciation 
and accretion included in operations expense consists of the accretion of the costs of removal for future retirements of utility assets, 
vehicle depreciation, computer software and hardware depreciation, and other minor amounts of depreciation expense. For the 
years  ended  December 31,  2018,  2017  and  2016,  we  reported  $8.5  million,  $8.1  million  and  $7.3  million,  respectively,  of 
depreciation and accretion in operations expenses.

 Regulated Operations

We account for our regulated operations in accordance with ASC Topic 980, Regulated Operations, which includes accounting 
principles for companies whose rates are determined by independent third-party regulators. When setting rates, regulators often 
make decisions, the economics of which require companies to defer costs or revenues in different periods than may be appropriate 
for unregulated enterprises. When this situation occurs, a regulated company defers the associated costs as regulatory assets on 
the balance sheet and records them as expense on the income statement as it collects revenues. Further, regulators can also impose 
liabilities upon a regulated company, for amounts previously collected from customers and for recovery of costs that are expected 
to be incurred in the future, as regulatory liabilities. If we were required to terminate the application of these regulatory provisions 
to our regulated operations, all such deferred amounts would be recognized in the statement of income at that time, which could 
have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

We monitor our regulatory and competitive environments to determine whether the recovery of our regulatory assets continues to 
be probable. If we determined that recovery of these assets is no longer probable, we would write off the assets against earnings. 
We believe that the provisions of ASC Topic 980, Regulated Operations, continue to apply to our regulated operations and that 
the recovery of our regulatory assets is probable.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues for our natural gas and electric distribution operations are based on rates approved by the PSC in each state in which 
they operate. Eastern Shore’s revenues are based on rates approved by the FERC. Customers’ base rates may not be changed 
without formal approval by these commissions. The PSCs, however, have authorized our regulated operations to negotiate rates, 
based on approved methodologies, with customers that have competitive alternatives. The FERC has also authorized Eastern Shore 
to negotiate rates above or below the FERC-approved maximum rates, which customers can elect as an alternative to FERC-
approved maximum rates.

For regulated deliveries of natural gas and electricity, we read meters and bill customers on monthly cycles that do not coincide 
with the accounting periods used for financial reporting purposes. We accrue unbilled revenues for natural gas and electricity 
delivered, but not yet billed, at the end of an accounting period to the extent that they do not coincide. We estimate the amount of 
the unbilled revenue by jurisdiction and customer class. 

All of our regulated natural gas and electric distribution operations have fuel cost recovery mechanisms, except for two utilities 
that provide only unbundled delivery service (Chesapeake Utilities' Central Florida Gas division and FPU's Indiantown division). 
These mechanisms allow us to adjust billing rates, without further regulatory approvals, to reflect changes in the cost of purchased 
fuel. Differences between the cost of fuel purchased and delivered are deferred and accounted for as either unrecovered fuel cost 
or amounts payable to customers. Generally, these deferred amounts are recovered or refunded within one year. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 58

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

We charge flexible rates to our natural gas distribution industrial interruptible customers who can use alternative fuels. Interruptible 
service imposes no contractual obligation to deliver or receive natural gas on a firm service basis.

For the unregulated propane operation business, we record revenue in the period the products are delivered and/or services are 
rendered for bulk delivery customers without meters. For propane customers with meters and natural gas marketing customers 
whose billing cycles do not coincide with our accounting periods, we accrue unbilled revenue for product delivered but not yet 
billed and bill customers at the end of an accounting period, as we do in our regulated businesses.

Our Ohio natural gas transmission/supply operation recognizes revenues based on actual volumes of natural gas shipped using 
contractual rates based upon index prices that are published monthly. 

Our natural gas marketing operation recognizes revenue based on the volume of natural gas delivered to its customers. 

Eight Flags records revenues based on the amount of electricity and steam generated and sold to its customers.

We report revenue taxes, such as gross receipts taxes, franchise taxes, and sales taxes, on a net basis.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales includes the direct costs attributable to the products sold or services provided to our customers. These costs 
include primarily the variable commodity cost of natural gas, electricity and propane, costs of pipeline capacity needed to 
transport and store natural gas, transmission costs for electricity, costs to gather and process natural gas, costs to transport 
propane to/from our storage facilities or our mobile CNG equipment to customer locations, and steam and electricity generation 
costs. Depreciation expense is not included in cost of sales.

Operations and Maintenance Expenses

Operations and maintenance expenses include operations and maintenance salaries and benefits, materials and supplies, usage of 
vehicles, tools and equipment, payments to contractors, utility plant maintenance, customer service, professional fees and other 
outside services, insurance expense, minor amounts of depreciation, accretion of removal costs for future retirements of utility 
assets and other administrative expenses.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Our policy is to invest cash in excess of operating requirements in overnight income-producing accounts. Such amounts are stated 
at cost, which approximates fair value. Investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered 
cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts due for sales of natural gas, electricity and propane and transportation and 
distribution services to customers. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded against amounts due based upon our collections 
experiences and an assessment of our customers’ inability or reluctance to pay. If circumstances change, our estimates of recoverable 
accounts receivable may also change. Circumstances which could affect such estimates include, but are not limited to, customer 
credit issues, the level of natural gas, electricity and propane prices and general economic conditions. Accounts are written off 
when they are deemed to be uncollectible.

Inventories

We use the average cost method to value propane, materials and supplies, and other merchandise inventory. If market prices drop 
below cost, inventory balances that are subject to price risk are adjusted to their net realizable value. There was no lower-of-cost-
or-net realizable value adjustment during 2018, 2017 or 2016.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances 
change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. We use a present value 
technique based on discounted cash flows to estimate the fair value of our reporting units. An impairment charge is recognized if 
the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The testing of goodwill for 2018, 2017 and 2016
indicated no goodwill impairment.

Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic useful lives. 

Other Deferred Charges

Other deferred charges include primarily issuance costs associated with short-term borrowings.  These charges are amortized over 
the life of the related short-term debt borrowings. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 59

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Asset Removal Cost

As authorized by the appropriate regulatory body (state PSC or FERC), we accrue future asset removal costs associated with utility 
property, plant and equipment even if a legal obligation does not exist. Such accruals are provided for through depreciation expense 
and are recorded with corresponding credits to regulatory liabilities or assets. When we retire depreciable utility plant and equipment, 
we charge the associated original costs to accumulated depreciation and amortization, and any related removal costs incurred are 
charged to regulatory liabilities or assets. The difference between removal costs recognized in depreciation rates and the accretion 
and depreciation expense recognized for financial reporting purposes is a timing difference between recovery of these costs in 
rates and their recognition for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, these differences are deferred as regulatory liabilities or 
assets. In the rate setting process, the regulatory liability or asset is excluded from the rate base upon which those utilities have 
the opportunity to earn their allowed rates of return. The costs associated with our asset retirement obligations are either currently 
being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery in future rates.  

Pension and Other Postretirement Plans

Pension and other postretirement plan costs and liabilities are determined on an actuarial basis and are affected by numerous 
assumptions and estimates, including the fair value of plan assets, estimates of the expected returns on plan assets, assumed discount 
rates, the level of contributions made to the plans, and current demographic and actuarial mortality data. We review annually the 
estimates and assumptions underlying our pension and other postretirement plan costs and liabilities with the assistance of third-
party actuarial firms. The assumed discount rates, expected returns on plan assets and the mortality assumption are the factors that 
generally have the most significant impact on our pension costs and liabilities. The assumed discount rates, health care cost trend 
rates and rates of retirement generally have the most significant impact on our postretirement plan costs and liabilities.

The discount rates are utilized principally in calculating the actuarial present value of our pension and postretirement obligations 
and net pension and postretirement costs. When estimating our discount rates, we consider high-quality corporate bond rates, such 
as the Prudential curve index and the Citigroup yield curve, changes in those rates from the prior year and other pertinent factors, 
including the expected life of each of our plans and their respective payment options.

The expected long-term rates of return on assets are utilized in calculating the expected returns on the plan assets component of 
our annual pension plan costs. We estimate the expected returns on plan assets of each of our plans by evaluating expected bond 
returns, asset allocations, the effects of active plan management, the impact of periodic plan asset rebalancing and historical 
performance. We also consider the guidance from our investment advisors in making a final determination of our expected rates 
of return on assets.

We estimate the health care cost trend rates used in determining our postretirement net expense based upon actual health care cost 
experience, the effects of recently enacted legislation and general economic conditions. Our assumed rate of retirement is estimated 
based upon our annual reviews of participant census information as of the measurement date.

The mortality assumption used for our pension and postretirement plans reviewed periodically and is based on the actuarial table 
that best reflects of the expected mortality of the plan participants.  

Income Taxes, Investment Tax Credit Adjustments and Tax-Related Contingency

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the income tax effect of temporary differences between the financial statement 
basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted income tax rates in effect in the years in which the 
differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are recorded net of any valuation allowance when it is more likely than 
not that such income tax benefits will be realized. Investment tax credits on utility property have been deferred and are allocated 
to income ratably over the lives of the subject property.

We account for uncertainty in income taxes in our consolidated financial statements only if it is more likely than not that an 
uncertain tax position is sustainable based on technical merits. Recognizable tax positions are then measured to determine the 
amount of benefit recognized in the consolidated financial statements. We recognize penalties and interest related to unrecognized 
tax benefits as a component of other income.

We account for contingencies associated with taxes other than income when the likelihood of a loss is both probable and estimable. 
In assessing the likelihood of a loss, we do not consider the existence of current inquiries, or the likelihood of future inquiries, by 
tax authorities as a factor.  Our assessment is based solely on our application of the appropriate statutes and the likelihood of a 
loss, assuming the proper inquiries are made by tax authorities.

Financial Instruments

Our propane operations enter into derivative transactions, such as swaps, put options and call options in order to mitigate the 
impact  of  wholesale  price  fluctuations  on  inventory  valuation  and  future  purchase  commitments.  Our  natural  gas  marketing 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 60

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

operation enters into natural gas futures and swap contracts to mitigate any price risk associated with the purchase and/or sale of 
natural gas to specific customers.  These transactions may be designated as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges, if they meet all 
of the accounting requirements pursuant to ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and we elect to designate the instruments 
as hedges. If designated as a fair value hedge, the value of the hedging instrument, such as a swap, future, or put option, is recorded 
at fair value, with the effective portion of the gain or loss of the hedging instrument effectively reducing or increasing the value 
of the hedged item. If designated as a cash flow hedge, the value of the hedging instrument, such as a swap, call option or natural 
gas futures contract, is recorded at fair value with the effective portion of the gain or loss of the hedging instrument being recorded 
in comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss of a hedge is recorded in earnings. If the instrument is not 
designated as a fair value or cash flow hedge, or it does not meet the accounting requirements of a hedge under ASC Topic 815, 
Derivatives and Hedging, it is recorded at fair value with all gains or losses being recorded directly in earnings. 

Our natural gas, electric and propane operations and natural gas marketing operations enter into agreements with suppliers to 
purchase natural gas, electricity, and propane for resale to our respective customers. Purchases under these contracts, as well as 
distribution and marketing operations sales agreements with counterparties or customers, either do not meet the definition of a 
derivative, or qualify for “normal purchases and sales” treatment under ASC Topic 815 Derivatives and Hedging, and are accounted 
for on an accrual basis. 

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606) - On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts 
with Customers, and all the related amendments using the modified retrospective method. We recognized the cumulative effect 
of initially applying the new revenue standard to all of our contracts as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings. 
The comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those 
periods. The impact of adoption of the new revenue standard was immaterial to our net income.

This standard required entities to recognize revenue when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to customers 
at an amount that reflects the consideration that the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance 
also requires a number of disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows. 
See Note 5, Revenue Recognition, for additional information.

The following highlights the impact of the adoption of ASC 606 on our income statement for the year ended December 31, 2018
and consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018: 

Income statement

(in thousands)

Regulated Energy operating revenues

Regulated Energy cost of sales

Depreciation and amortization

Income before income taxes

Income taxes

Net income

Year Ended 
 December 31, 2018

As
Reported

Without
Adoption
of ASC 606

Effect of
Change
Higher
(Lower)

$

345,281

$

346,289

$

(1,008)

121,828

122,463

40,802

77,574

20,994

56,580

40,767

77,981

21,106

56,875

(635)

35

(407)

(112)

(295)

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 61

Balance sheet

(in thousands)

Assets

Accrued revenue

Long-term receivables and other deferred charges

Capitalization

Retained earnings

$

$

$

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

As of December 31, 2018

As Reported

Without Adoption of
ASC 606

Effect of Change
Higher (Lower)

27,499

6,985

$

$

29,461

6,816

$

$

(1,962)

169

261,530

$

263,323

$

(1,793)

The primary impact of the adoption of ASC 606 on our income statement was the delayed recognition of approximately $407,000
in operating income during the year ended December 31, 2018, to future years, and a cumulative adjustment that decreased retained 
earnings and other assets by $1.8 million at December 31, 2018, associated with a long-term firm transmission contract with an 
industrial customer. 

Compensation-Retirement Benefits (ASC 715) - In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of 
Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-Retirement Benefit Cost. Under this guidance, employers are required to report 
the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the 
pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit costs are required to be presented in the income 
statement separately from the service cost component and should not be included in operating expenses.  We adopted ASU 2017-07 
on January 1, 2018 and applied the changes in the other components of net benefit costs, retrospectively. As our plans have been 
frozen for some time, there is no service cost component.  The components of net benefit costs have been reclassified to other 
expense.  Aside from changes in presentation, implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial 
position or results of operations.

Statement of Cash Flows (ASC 230) - In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts 
and Cash Payments, which clarifies how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. We adopted ASU 2016-15 
on January 1, 2018. Implementation of this new standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated statement of cash 
flows.

Compensation - Stock Compensation (ASC 718) - In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting, 
to clarify when to account for a change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. Under this 
guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions or the award classification (equity or 
liability) change because of a change in the terms or conditions of the award. We adopted ASU 2017-09, prospectively, on January 
1, 2018. Implementation of this new standard did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Income  Statement  -  Reporting  Comprehensive  Income  (ASC  220)  -  In  February  2018,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  2018-02, 
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from 
accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA.  We adopted ASU 
2018-02  on  January  1,  2018,  and  reclassified  stranded  tax  effects  from  accumulated  other  comprehensive  loss  related  to  our 
employee benefit plans and commodity contract cash flows hedges. Implementation of this new standard did not have a material 
impact on our financial position and results of operations. See Note 16, Stockholders' Equity, for additional information. 

Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815) - In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for 
Hedging Activities, to better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through 
changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge 
results. ASU 2017-12 expands the risks that can be designated as hedged risks in cash flow hedges to include cash flow variability 
from contractually specified components of forecasted purchases or sales of non-financial assets. ASU 2017-12 requires the entire 
change in fair value of a hedging instrument that is included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness to be presented in the same 
income statement line that is used to present the earnings effects of the hedged item for fair value hedges and in other comprehensive 
income for cash flow hedges. ASU 2017-12 requires a tabular presentation of the income statement effect of fair value and cash 
flow hedges and eliminates the requirement to disclose the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of hedging instruments.  
We adopted ASU 2017-12, effective July 1, 2018, with no material impact on our financial statements. See Note 8, Derivative 
Instruments, for additional information with respect to the disclosures required by ASU 2017-12.

Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (ASC 715-20) - In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 
2018-14, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans, which removes, clarifies 
and adds certain disclosure requirements in ASC 715-20 related to defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans.   ASU 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 62

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

2018-14 will be effective for our annual and interim financial statements, on a retrospective basis, beginning January 1, 2021, 
although early adoption is permitted. We early adopted and updated our disclosures during the annual period ended December 31, 
2018. Since the guidance impacted disclosures only, there was no impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Recent Accounting Standards Yet to be Adopted

Leases (ASC 842) - In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires lessees to recognize leases on the 
balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. The standard establishes a right of use ("ROU") model 
that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability for all leases with a term greater than 12 months. The update 
also expands the required quantitative and qualitative disclosures surrounding leases. ASC 842 was subsequently amended by 
ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842; ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements 
to Topic 842, Leases; and ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for our annual and interim 
financial statements, beginning January 1, 2019, although early adoption is permitted.  We expect to adopt ASU 2016-02 effective 
January 1, 2019, and use the modified retrospective transition approach to all existing leases.

The  new  standard  permits  companies  to  elect  several  practical  expedients. We  expect  to  elect:  (1)  the  ‘package  of  practical 
expedients,’ pursuant to which we do not need to reassess our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and 
initial direct costs and (2) the ‘use-of-hindsight’ practical expedient, which allows us to use hindsight in assessing impairment of 
our existing land easements.  We also intend to aggregate all non-lease components with the respective lease components.

The most significant effect of ASC 842 will be recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities on our balance sheet for our operating 
leases and providing significant new disclosures about our leasing activities. We currently expect that upon adoption, we will 
recognize lease liabilities ranging from $11.0 to $13.0 million, with corresponding ROU of the same amount based on the present 
value of the remaining minimum rental payments for existing operating leases. 

Intangibles-Goodwill (ASC 350) - In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, 
which simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment 
test. ASU 2017-04 will be effective for our annual and interim financial statements beginning January 1, 2020, although early 
adoption is permitted. The amendments included in this ASU are to be applied prospectively. We believe that implementation of 
this new standard will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Compensation - Stock Compensation (ASC 718) - In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee 
Share-Based Payment Accounting, which expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring 
goods and services from nonemployees.  ASU 2018-07 will be effective for our annual and interim financial statements beginning 
January 1, 2019, although early adoption is permitted.  We believe that implementation of this new standard will not have a material 
impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Fair Value Measurement (ASC 820) - In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the 
Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which removes, modifies and adds certain disclosure requirements on fair 
value measurements in ASC 820.  ASU 2018-13 will be effective for our annual and interim financial statements beginning January 
1, 2020.  Since the changes only impact disclosures, there will be no financial impact.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 63

 
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table presents the calculation of our basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31:

For the Year Ended December 31,
2017

2016

2018

(in thousands, except shares and per share data)
Calculation of Basic Earnings Per Share:

Net Income
Weighted average shares outstanding

Basic Earnings Per Share

Calculation of Diluted Earnings Per Share:

Net Income

Reconciliation of Denominator:

Weighted average shares outstanding — Basic
Effect of dilutive securities — Share-based compensation

Adjusted denominator — Diluted
Diluted Earnings Per Share

4. ACQUISITIONS

Acquisitions in 2018

Marlin Gas Services and Ohl Fuel Oil Acquisitions

$

$

$

$

56,580
16,369,616
3.46

$

$

58,124
16,336,789
3.56

$

$

44,675
15,570,539
2.87

56,580

$

58,124

$

44,675

16,369,616
50,254
16,419,870
3.45

16,336,789
46,563
16,383,352
3.55

15,570,539
42,552
15,613,091
2.86

$

$

In December 2018, Marlin Gas Services, LLC (“Marlin Gas Services”), our newly created subsidiary, acquired certain operating 
assets of Marlin Gas Transport, Inc. (“Marlin Gas Transport”), a supplier of mobile compressed natural gas utility and pipeline 
solutions.  The acquisition will enable Chesapeake Utilities to offer solutions to address supply interruption scenarios and tailor 
other alternatives where pipeline supplies are not available or cannot meet customer requirements.

 In December 2018, Sharp acquired certain propane operating assets and customers of R. F. Ohl Fuel Oil, Inc. ("Ohl"), which 
provided propane distribution service to approximately 2,500 residential and commercial customers in Pennsylvania. 

We accounted for the purchases of the operating assets of Marlin Gas Transport and Ohl, which totaled approximately $18.4 
million, as business combinations within our Unregulated Energy segment. Goodwill of $4.8 million, related to the Marlin Gas 
Transport acquisition, and $1.5 million, associated with the Ohl acquisition, were initially recorded at the close of these transactions.  
The  amounts  recorded  in  conjunction  with  these  acquisitions  are  preliminary  and  subject  to  adjustment  based  on  additional 
valuations performed during the measurement period. Due to the timing of these acquisitions, the revenue and net income from 
these acquisitions in 2018 were immaterial.

Acquisitions in 2017

ARM, Chipola and Central Gas Acquisitions

In August 2017, PESCO acquired certain natural gas marketing assets of ARM Energy Management, LLC ("ARM"). The acquired 
assets complemented PESCO’s existing asset portfolio and expanded our regional footprint and retail demand in a market where 
we had existing pipeline capacity and wholesale liquidity.  We accounted for the purchase of these assets as a business combination 
and initially recorded goodwill of $4.3 million within our Unregulated Energy segment. In connection with the acquisition, we 
initially recorded a contingent consideration liability of $2.5 million, based on a projection that the acquired business would achieve 
a gross margin target in 2018. During the second quarter of 2018, we identified certain known information as of the acquisition 
date that was not considered in our original analysis and would have resulted in no contingent consideration liability being initially 
recorded. Therefore, we reversed the originally-recorded contingent liability and reduced goodwill by $2.5 million. We similarly 
revised the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. These revisions are considered immaterial to our consolidated 
financial statements. Based on actual gross margin results in 2018, we were not required to make additional payments under the 
contingent consideration provisions of the purchase agreement.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 64

 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

In August and December of 2017, Flo-gas acquired certain operating assets of Chipola Propane Gas Company ("Chipola") and 
Central Gas Company of Okeechobee, Incorporated ("Central Gas"), adding approximately 1,125 residential and commercial 
propane delivery service customers in Florida.

The acquisition accounting amounts recorded in conjunction with the above transactions are final. The revenue and net income 
from these acquisitions included in our consolidated statements of income were not material.

5. REVENUE RECOGNITION

We recognize revenue when our performance obligations under contracts with customers have been satisfied, which generally 
occurs when our businesses have delivered or transported natural gas, electricity or propane to customers. We exclude sales taxes 
and other similar taxes from the transaction price. Typically, our customers pay for the goods and/or services we provide in the 
month following the satisfaction of our performance obligation.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 65

The  following  table  displays  our  revenue  by  major  source  based  on  product  and  service  type  for  the  twelve  months  ended 
December 31, 2018:

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)

Energy distribution

Delaware natural gas division

Florida natural gas division

FPU electric distribution

FPU natural gas distribution

Maryland natural gas division

Sandpiper natural gas/propane operations

Total energy distribution

Energy transmission

Aspire Energy

Eastern Shore

Peninsula Pipeline

Total energy transmission

Energy generation

Eight Flags

Propane operations

Mid-Atlantic propane operations

Florida propane operations

Total propane operations

Energy services

Marlin Gas Services

PESCO - Natural Gas Marketing

Other and eliminations

Eliminations

Other

Total other and eliminations

Regulated
Energy

Unregulated
Energy

Other and
Eliminations

Total

$

70,338

$

— $

— $

25,341

79,803

81,118

24,172

22,088

302,860

—

64,248

11,927

76,175

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

35,407

—

—

35,407

17,302

102,321

21,282

123,603

121

258,713

258,834

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

70,338

25,341

79,803

81,118

24,172

22,088

302,860

35,407

64,248

11,927

111,582

17,302

102,321

21,282

123,603

121

258,713

258,834

(33,754)

—

(33,754)

(16,486)

1,957

(14,529)

(49,062)

653

(48,409)

(99,302)

2,610

(96,692)

Total operating revenues (1)
345,281
(1) Includes other revenue (revenues from sources other than contracts with customers) of $236,000 and $334,000 for our Regulated and Unregulated Energy 
segments, respectively. The sources of other revenues include revenue from alternative revenue programs related to revenue normalization for Maryland division 
and Sandpiper and late fees.

(48,409)

717,489

420,617

$

$

$

$

Regulated Energy Segment

The businesses within our Regulated Energy segment are regulated utilities whose operations and customer contracts are subject 
to rates approved by the respective state PSC or the FERC.

Our energy distribution operations deliver natural gas or electricity to customers, and we bill the customers for both the delivery 
of natural gas or electricity and the related commodity, where applicable. In most jurisdictions, our customers are also required 
to purchase the commodity from us, although certain customers in some jurisdictions may purchase the commodity from a third-

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 66

party retailer (in which case we provide delivery service only). We consider the delivery of natural gas or electricity and/or the 
related commodity sale as one performance obligation because the commodity and its delivery are highly interrelated with two-
way dependency on one another. Our performance obligation is satisfied over time as natural gas or electricity is delivered and 
consumed by the customer. We recognize revenues based on monthly meter readings, which are based on the quantity of natural 
gas or electricity used and the approved rates. We accrue unbilled revenues for natural gas and electricity that have been delivered, 
but not yet billed, at the end of an accounting period, to the extent that billing and delivery do not coincide.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Revenues for Eastern Shore are based on rates approved by the FERC. The FERC has also authorized Eastern Shore to negotiate 
rates above or below the FERC-approved maximum rates, which customers can elect as an alternative to the FERC-approved 
maximum rates. Eastern Shore's services can be firm or interruptible. Firm services are offered on a guaranteed basis and are 
available at all times unless prevented by force majeure or other permitted curtailments. Interruptible customers receive service 
only when there is available capacity or supply. Our performance obligation is satisfied over time as we deliver natural gas to the 
customers' locations. We recognize revenues based on capacity used or reserved and the fixed monthly charge.

Peninsula Pipeline is engaged in natural gas intrastate transmission to third-party customers and certain affiliates in the State of 
Florida. Our performance obligation is satisfied over time as the natural gas is transported to customers. We recognize revenue 
based on rates approved by the Florida PSC and the capacity used or reserved.  We accrue unbilled revenues for transportation 
services provided and not yet billed at the end of an accounting period.

Unregulated Energy Segment

Revenues generated from the Unregulated Energy segment are not subject to any federal, state, or local pricing regulations. Aspire 
Energy primarily sources gas from hundreds of conventional producers and performs gathering and processing functions to maintain 
the quality and reliability of its gas for its wholesale customers.  Aspire Energy's performance obligation is satisfied over time as 
natural gas is delivered to its customers. Aspire Energy recognizes revenue based on the deliveries of natural gas at contractually 
agreed upon rates (which are based upon an established monthly index price and a monthly operating fee, as applicable).  For 
natural gas customers, we accrue unbilled revenues for natural gas that has been delivered, but not yet billed, at the end of an 
accounting period, to the extent that billing and delivery do not coincide with the end of the accounting period.

Eight Flags' CHP plant, which is located on land leased from a customer, produces three sources of energy:  electricity, steam and 
heated water. Rayonier purchases the steam (unfired and fired) and heated water, which are used in the customer’s production 
facility. Our electric distribution operation purchases the electricity generated by the CHP plant for distribution to its customers. 
Eight Flags' performance obligation is satisfied over time as deliveries of heated water, steam and electricity occur. Eight Flags 
recognizes revenues over time based on the amount of heated water, steam and electricity generated and delivered to its customers.

For our propane operations, we recognize revenue based upon customer type and service offered. Generally, for propane bulk 
delivery customers (customers without meters) and wholesale sales, our performance obligation is satisfied when we deliver 
propane to the customers' locations (point-in-time basis). We recognize revenue from these customers based on the number of 
gallons delivered and the price per gallon at the point-in-time of delivery. For our propane delivery customers with meters, we 
satisfy our performance obligation over time when we deliver propane to customers.  We recognize revenue over time based on 
the amount of propane consumed and the applicable price per unit. For propane delivery metered customers, we accrue unbilled 
revenues for propane that has been delivered, but not yet billed, at the end of an accounting period, to the extent that billing and 
delivery do not coincide with the end of the accounting period.

PESCO provides natural gas supply and asset management services to customers (including affiliates of Chesapeake Utilities) 
located primarily in Florida, the Delmarva Peninsula, and the Appalachian Basin. PESCO's performance obligation is satisfied 
over time as natural gas is delivered to its customers.  PESCO recognizes revenue over time based on monthly customer meter 
readings. We accrue unbilled revenues for natural gas that has been delivered, but not yet billed, at the end of an accounting period.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 67

Contract balances

The timing of revenue recognition, customer billings and cash collections results in trade receivables, unbilled receivables (contract 
assets), and customer advances (contract liabilities) in our consolidated balance sheets. The balances of our trade receivables, 
contract assets, and contract liabilities as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)

Balance at 12/31/2017

Balance at 12/31/2018

Increase (decrease)

Trade
Receivables

Contract Assets
(Non-current)

Contract Liabilities
(Current)

$

$

74,962
83,214

8,252

$

$

1,270
2,614

1,344

$

$

407
480

73

Our trade receivables are included in accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets. Our non-current contract assets are 
included in receivables and other deferred charges in the consolidated balance sheet and relate to operations and maintenance costs 
incurred by Eight Flags that have not yet been recovered through rates for the sale of electricity to our electric distribution operation 
pursuant to a long-term service agreement.

At times, we receive advances or deposits from our customers before we satisfy our performance obligation, resulting in contract 
liabilities. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, we had a contract liability of $480,000 and $407,000, respectively, which was included 
in other accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet, and which relates to non-refundable prepaid fixed fees for our Mid-
Atlantic propane operation's retail offerings. Our performance obligation is satisfied over the term of the respective retail offering 
plan on a ratable basis. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, we recognized revenue of $697,000.

Remaining performance obligations

Our businesses have long-term fixed fee contracts with customers in which revenues are recognized as performance obligations 
are satisfied over the contract term.  Revenue for these businesses for the remaining performance obligations at December 31, 
2018 are expected to be recognized as follows:

(in thousands)

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024 and
thereafter

Eastern Shore and Peninsula Pipeline

$ 38,505

$ 36,768

$ 33,510

$ 26,566

$ 21,146

$

212,620

Natural gas distribution operations

PESCO - Natural Gas Marketing

FPU electric distribution

4,109

8,886

297

3,586

4,702

297

3,358

1,728

297

3,320

2,924

30,826

23

109

—

—

—

—

Total revenue contracts with remaining performance
obligations

$ 51,797

$ 45,353

$ 38,893

$ 30,018

$ 24,070

$

243,446

Practical expedients

For  our  businesses  with  agreements  that  contain  variable  consideration,  we  use  the  invoice  practical  expedient  method.  We 
determined that the amounts invoiced to customers correspond directly with the value to our customers and our performance to 
date. 

6. SEGMENT INFORMATION

We use the management approach to identify operating segments. We organize our business around differences in regulatory 
environment and/or products or services, and the operating results of each segment are regularly reviewed by the chief operating 
decision maker (our Chief Executive Officer) in order to make decisions about resources and to assess performance.

Our operations are comprised of two reportable segments:

•  Regulated  Energy.  Includes  energy  distribution  and  transmission  services  (natural  gas  distribution,  natural  gas 
transmission and electric distribution operations). All operations in this segment are regulated, as to their rates and services, 
by the PSC having jurisdiction in each operating territory or by the FERC in the case of Eastern Shore.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 68

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

•  Unregulated Energy. Includes energy transmission, energy generation (the operations of our Eight Flags' CHP plant), 
propane operations, the new mobile CNG utility and pipeline solutions subsidiary, and other energy services (natural gas 
marketing and related services). These operations are unregulated as to their rates and services. Through March 2017, 
this segment also included the operations of Xeron, our propane and crude oil trading subsidiary that wound down its 
operations shortly after the first quarter of 2017. Also included in this segment are other unregulated energy services, 
such as energy-related merchandise sales and heating, ventilation and air conditioning, plumbing and electrical services.

The remainder of our operations is presented as “Other businesses and eliminations,” which consists of unregulated subsidiaries 
that own real estate leased to Chesapeake Utilities, as well as certain corporate costs not allocated to other operations. 

The following table presents information about our reportable segments.

For the Year Ended December 31,
2017

2016

2018

(in thousands)
Operating Revenues, Unaffiliated Customers

Regulated Energy
Unregulated Energy

Total operating revenues, unaffiliated customers
Intersegment Revenues (1)
Regulated Energy
Unregulated Energy
Other businesses
Total intersegment revenues
Operating Income

Regulated Energy
Unregulated Energy
Other businesses and eliminations

Operating Income
Other expense
Interest charges
Income Before Income taxes
Income taxes
Net Income
Depreciation and Amortization

Regulated Energy
Unregulated Energy
Other businesses and eliminations

Total depreciation and amortization
Capital Expenditures
Regulated Energy
Unregulated Energy
Other businesses
Total capital expenditures

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

332,749
384,740
717,489

12,532
35,877
653
49,062

79,215
16,901
(1,496)
94,620
(615)
16,431
77,574
20,994
56,580

31,876
8,845
81
40,802

235,912
38,700
8,364
282,976

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

316,971
300,612
617,583

9,339
23,983
774
34,096

74,584
12,631
205
87,420
(2,342)
12,645
72,433
14,309
58,124

28,554
7,954
91
36,599

159,011
26,190
5,902
191,103

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

302,402
196,458
498,860

3,287
7,321
880
11,488

71,515
14,066
402
85,983
(2,328)
10,639
73,016
28,341
44,675

25,677
6,386
96
32,159

139,994
23,984
5,398
169,376  

(1) All significant intersegment revenues are billed at market rates and have been eliminated from consolidated revenues.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 69

 
 
 
Identifiable Assets
Regulated Energy
Unregulated Energy
Other businesses
Total identifiable assets

Our operations are entirely domestic. 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

As of December 31,
2017
2018

$

$

1,345,805
306,045
41,821
1,693,671

$

$

1,121,673
259,041
34,220
1,414,934

7. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES

Cash paid for interest and income taxes during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

(in thousands)
Cash paid for interest
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds

$
$

16,741
477

$
$

12,420
$
(4,114) $

10,315
(5,308)

Non-cash investing and financing activities during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were as follows: 

For the Year Ended December 31,
2017

2016

2018

For the Year Ended December 31,
2017

2016

2018

(in thousands)
Capital property and equipment acquired on account, but not paid for as of
December 31

Common stock issued for the Retirement Savings Plan

Common stock issued under the SICP

Capital lease obligation

8. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS 

$

$

$

$

39,402

$
— $

2,006

1,310

$

$

15,457

$

— $

1,127

2,070

$

$

9,791

777

1,027

3,471

We use derivative and non-derivative contracts to manage risks related to obtaining adequate supplies and the price fluctuations 
of natural gas, electricity and propane. Our natural gas, electric and propane operations have entered into agreements with suppliers 
to purchase natural gas, electricity and propane for resale to our customers. Aspire Energy has entered into contracts with producers 
to secure natural gas to meet its obligations. Purchases under these contracts typically either do not meet the definition of derivatives 
or are considered “normal purchases and normal sales” and are accounted for on an accrual basis. Both our propane operations 
and our natural gas marketing operations may also enter into fair value hedges of their inventory or cash flow hedges of their 
future purchase commitments in order to mitigate the impact of wholesale price fluctuations. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
our natural gas and electric distribution operations did not have any outstanding derivative contracts. 

We adopted ASU 2017-12 as of July 1, 2018. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, under the heading "recently 
adopted accounting standards" for additional details.

Volume of Derivative Activity

As of December 31, 2018, the volume of our open commodity derivative contracts were as follows:

Business unit

PESCO/natural gas marketing

PESCO/natural gas marketing

Sharp/propane operations

Sharp/propane operations

Commodity

Natural gas (Dts)

Natural gas (Dts)

Propane (gallons)

Propane (gallons)

Quantity hedged
(in millions)
14.4

3.8

9.7

0.3

Designation

Longest Expiration
date of hedge

Cash flows hedges March 2022

Not designated

December 2020

Cash flows hedges

June 2021

Fair value hedges

March 2019

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 70

 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

PESCO entered into natural gas futures contracts associated with the purchase and sale of natural gas to specific customers. We 
designated and accounted for them as cash flow hedges.  The change in fair value of the natural gas futures contracts is recorded 
as unrealized gain (loss) in other comprehensive income (loss) and later recognized in the statement of income in the same period 
and in the same line item as the hedged transaction. We expect to reclassify approximately $1.5 million from accumulated other 
comprehensive loss to earnings during the next 12-month period ending December 31, 2019.

Sharp entered into futures and swap agreements to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in wholesale propane index prices associated 
with the propane volumes expected to be purchased during the heating season. Under the futures and swap agreements, Sharp will 
receive the difference between (i) the index prices (Mont Belvieu prices in August 2018 through June 2021) and (ii) the per gallon 
propane swap prices, to the extent the index prices exceed the contracted prices. If the index prices are lower than the swap prices, 
Sharp will pay the difference. We designated and accounted for propane swaps as cash flows hedges. The change in the fair value 
of the swap agreements is recorded as unrealized gain (loss) in other comprehensive income (loss) and later recognized in the 
statement of income in the same period and in the same line item as the hedged transaction. We expect to reclassify approximately 
$1.2 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings during the next 12-month period ending December 31, 
2019.

Balance sheet offsetting 

PESCO has entered into master netting agreements with counterparties that enable it to net the counterparties' outstanding accounts 
receivable and payable, which are presented on a net basis in the consolidated balance sheets. The following table summarizes 
the accounts receivable and payables on a gross and net basis at December 31, 2018 and 2017:

(in thousands)

Accounts receivable

Accounts payable

(in thousands)

Accounts receivable

Accounts payable

Broker Margin

Gross amounts

Amounts offset

Net amounts

At December 31, 2018

$

$

$

$

12,368

24,741

Gross amounts

8,283

16,643

$

$

$

$

3,834

3,834

At December 31, 2017

Amounts offset

2,391

2,391

$

$

$

$

8,534

20,907

5,892

14,252

Net amounts

Futures exchanges have contract specific margin requirements that require the posting of cash or cash equivalents relating to traded 
contracts. Margin requirements consist of initial margin that is posted upon the initiation of a position, maintenance margin that 
is  usually  expressed  as  a  percent  of  initial  margin,  and  variation  margin  that  fluctuates  based  on  the  daily  MTM  relative  to 
maintenance margin requirements. We maintain separate broker margin accounts for Sharp and PESCO. At December 31, 2018 
and 2017, Sharp's account had a zero balance. The balances related to PESCO are as follows:

(in thousands)
PESCO

Financial Statements Presentation

Balance Sheet Location

December 31,
2018

December 31,
2017

Other Current Assets

$

2,810

$

6,300

The following tables present information about the fair value and related gains and losses of our derivative contracts. We did not 
have  any  derivative  contracts  with  a  credit-risk-related  contingency.    Fair  values  of  the  derivative  contracts  recorded  in  the 
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 71

(in thousands)

Balance Sheet Location

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Derivative Assets

Fair Value As Of

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

Propane swap agreements

Natural gas futures contracts

Derivatives designated as fair value hedges

Derivative assets, at fair value

Derivative assets, at fair value

Propane put options

Derivative assets, at fair value

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges

Natural gas futures contracts

Propane swap agreements

Total Derivative Assets

Derivative assets, at fair value

Derivative assets, at fair value

$

$

— $

4,024

71

9,059

11

13,165

$

13

—

—

92

1,181
1,286  

Derivative Liabilities

Fair Value As Of

(in thousands)

Balance Sheet Location

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

Natural gas futures contracts

Derivative liabilities, at fair value

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges

Natural gas futures contracts

Natural gas swap contracts

Propane swap agreements

Total Derivative Liabilities

Derivative liabilities, at fair value

Derivative liabilities, at fair value

Derivative liabilities, at fair value

$

$

4,562

$

8,705

—

1,604

14,871

$

 The effects of gains and losses from derivative instruments are as follows:

(in thousands)

Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments

Realized gain (loss) on forward contracts 
and options (1)

Natural gas futures contracts

Propane swap agreements

Natural gas swap contracts

Derivatives designated as fair value hedges

Put/Call option

Natural gas futures contracts

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges

Propane swap agreements

Propane swap agreements

Natural gas futures contracts

Natural gas swap contracts

Natural gas futures contracts

Natural gas swap contracts

Total

Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives:

Location of Gain
(Loss) on Derivatives

For the Year Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

Revenue

Cost of sales

Cost of sales

Cost of sales

Cost of sales

Natural gas inventory

Cost of sales

Other comprehensive income (loss)

Cost of sales

Cost of sales

Other comprehensive income (loss)

Other comprehensive income

$

— $

112

$

(3,189)

(3,633)

(13)

—

—

—

(647)

(2,773)

(2,010)

197

532

200

8

1

(9)

—

1,607

487

(456)

(822)

(1,476)

986

$

(7,703) $

(3,195) $

5,776

—

469

2

6,247

(546)

(541)

7

—

49

(233)

(364)

1,016

345

—

222

—

(45)

(1) All of the realized and unrealized gain (loss) on forward contracts represents the effect of trading activities on our consolidated statements of income.

As of December 31, 2018, the following amounts were recorded in the consolidated balance sheets related to fair value hedges:

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 72

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)

Carrying Amount of Hedged Item

Cumulative Adjustment Included in
Carrying Amount of Hedged Item

Balance Sheet Location of Hedged Items

Inventory

At December 31,
2018

At December 31,
2017

At December 31,
2018

At December 31,
2017

$

212

$

— $

— $

—

9. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The three levels 
of the fair value hierarchy are the following:

Fair Value
Hierarchy
Level 1

Description of Fair Value Level

Unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets that are accessible at the
measurement date for identical,
unrestricted assets or liabilities

Level 2

Quoted prices in markets that are not
active, or inputs which are observable,
either directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the asset or
liability

Level 3

Prices or valuation techniques requiring
inputs that are both significant to the fair
value measurement and unobservable
(i.e. supported by little or no market
activity)

Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

Fair Value Technique Utilized
Investments - equity securities - The fair values of these 
trading securities are recorded at fair value based on 
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical 
securities.

Investments - mutual funds and other - The fair values of 
these investments, comprised of money market and mutual 
funds, are recorded at fair value based on quoted net asset 
values of the shares.

Derivative assets and liabilities - The fair values of forward 
contracts are measured using market transactions in either the 
listed or over-the-counter markets. The fair value of the 
propane put/call options, swap agreements and natural gas 
futures contracts are measured using market transactions for 
similar assets and liabilities in either the listed or over-the-
counter markets.

Investments - guaranteed income fund - The fair values of 
these investments are recorded at the contract value, which 
approximates their fair value.

The following tables summarize our financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the fair 
value measurements, by level, within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively: 

As of December 31, 2018

(in thousands)

Assets:

Investments—equity securities
Investments—guaranteed income fund
Investments—mutual funds and other
Total investments

Derivative assets

Total assets

Liabilities:

Derivative liabilities

Fair Value Measurements Using:

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Fair Value

$

$

$

22
686
6,003

6,711

13,165

19,876

14,871

$

$

$

$

22
—
6,003

6,025

—

6,025

$

— $
—
—

—

$

$

13,165

13,165

— $

14,871

—
686
—

686

—

686

—

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 73

 
 
As of December 31, 2017

Fair Value

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Fair Value Measurements Using:

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

(in thousands)
Assets:

Investments—equity securities
Investments—guaranteed income fund
Investments—mutual funds and other
Total investments

Derivative assets

Total assets
Liabilities:

Derivative liabilities

$

$

$

22
648
6,086
6,756

1,286
8,042

6,247

$

$

$

22
—
6,086
6,108

—
6,108

$

$

— $
—
—
—

1,286
1,286

$

$

—
648
—
648

—
648

—

— $

6,247

The following table sets forth the summary of the changes in the fair value of Level 3 investments for the years ended December 31, 
2018 and 2017:

(in thousands)
Beginning Balance
Purchases and adjustments
Transfers/disbursements
Investment income
Ending Balance

For the Year Ended December 31,

2018

2017

$

$

648
68
(41)
11
686

$

$

561
79
(53)
61
648

Investment income from the Level 3 investments is reflected in other expense, net in the consolidated statements of income.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were no non-financial assets or liabilities required to be reported at fair value. We review 
our non-financial assets for impairment at least on an annual basis, as required.

Other Financial Assets and Liabilities

Financial assets with carrying values approximating fair value include cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Financial 
liabilities with carrying values approximating fair value include accounts payable and other accrued liabilities and short-term debt. 
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents is measured using the comparable value in the active market and approximates its 
carrying value (Level 1 measurement). The fair value of short-term debt approximates the carrying value due to its short maturities 
and because interest rates approximate current market rates (Level 3 measurement).

At December 31, 2018, long-term debt, which includes the current maturities but excludes capital lease obligations, had a carrying 
value of $327.2 million, compared to the estimated fair value of $323.8 million, using a discounted cash flow methodology that 
incorporates a market interest rate based on published corporate borrowing rates for debt instruments with similar terms and 
average maturities, adjusted for duration, optionality and risk profile. At December 31, 2017, long-term debt, which includes the 
current maturities but excludes a capital lease obligation, had a carrying value of $205.2 million, compared to a fair value of $215.4 
million.  The valuation technique used to estimate the fair value of long-term debt would be considered a Level 3 measurement. 

See Note 17, Employee Benefit Plans, for fair value measurement information related to our pension plan assets.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 74

 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

10. INVESTMENTS

The investment balances at December 31, 2018 and 2017, consisted of the following: 

(in thousands)
Rabbi trust (associated with the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan)

Investments in equity securities
Total

As of December 31,

2018

2017

$

$

6,689
22
6,711

$

$

6,734
22
6,756

We classify these investments as trading securities and report them at their fair value. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we 
recorded net unrealized losses of $428,000 and for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded net unrealized gains 
of $1.0 million and $379,000, respectively, in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of income related to these 
investments. For the investment in the Rabbi Trust, we also have recorded an associated liability, which is included in other pension 
and benefit costs in the consolidated balance sheets and is adjusted each period for the gains and losses incurred by the investments 
in the Rabbi Trust.

11. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The carrying value of goodwill as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:

(in thousands)

Goodwill

Regulated Energy

                Florida Natural Gas Distribution(1)

Unregulated Energy

                Mid-Atlantic Propane Operations

  Florida Propane Operations

                 Aspire Energy

  Marlin Gas Services

                Natural Gas Marketing - PESCO

Total Goodwill

As of December 31,

2018

2017

$

3,353

$

3,353

2,147

1,188

10,119

4,760

4,270

$

25,837

$

674

1,188

10,119

—

4,270

19,604

(1) Florida natural gas distribution includes Chesapeake Utilities' Central Florida Gas division, FPU and FPU's Indiantown and Fort Meade divisions.

The annual impairment testing for 2018 and 2017 indicated no impairment of goodwill. 

The carrying value and accumulated amortization of intangible assets subject to amortization as of December 31, 2018 and 2017
are as follows:

(in thousands)
Customer lists
Non-Compete agreements
Other
Total

As of December 31,

2018

2017

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

$

$

7,757
2,245
270
10,272

$

$

3,664
202
199
4,065

$

$

7,393
270
270
7,933

$

$

2,880
175
192
3,247

The customer lists, non-compete agreements and other intangibles acquired in the purchases of the operating assets of several 
companies are being amortized over five to 41 years. 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 75

 
 
For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, amortization expense of intangible assets was $818,000, $537,000, and 
$380,000, respectively. Amortization expense of intangible assets is expected to be $1.1 million for each of the years 2019, 2020 
and 2021, $820,000 for 2022 and $813,000 for 2023.  

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

12. INCOME TAXES 

We file a consolidated federal income tax return. Income tax expense allocated to our subsidiaries is based upon their respective 
taxable incomes and tax credits. State income tax returns are filed on a separate company basis in most states where we have 
operations and/or are required to file. Our state returns for tax years after 2014 are subject to examination. At December 31, 2018, 
the 2015 and 2016 federal income tax returns are under examination, and no report has been issued at this time.

We had no net operating loss for federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. For state income tax purposes, 
we had net operating losses in various states of $60.1 million and $34.2 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, 
almost all of which will expire in 2037. We have recorded deferred tax assets of $2.0 million and $1.6 million related to state net 
operating loss carry-forwards at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, but we have not recorded a valuation allowance to 
reduce the future benefit of the tax net operating losses because we believe they will be fully utilized.

Federal Tax Reform 

On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the TCJA. Substantially all of the provisions of the TCJA are effective 
for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The provisions significantly impacting us include the reduction of the 
corporate federal income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. Our federal income tax expense for periods beginning on January 
1, 2018 are based on the new federal corporate income tax rate. The TCJA included changes to the Internal Revenue Code, which 
materially impacted our 2017 financial statements.  ASC 740, Income Taxes, requires recognition of the effects of changes in tax 
laws in the period in which the law is enacted.  ASC 740 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be measured at the enacted 
tax rate expected to apply when temporary differences are to be realized or settled. We have completed the assessment of the 
impact as it relates to accounting for certain effects of the TCJA. At the date of enactment in 2017, we re-measured deferred income 
taxes based upon the new corporate tax rate. See Note 19, Rates and Other Regulatory Activities, for further discussion of the 
TCJA's impact on our regulated businesses.

 In 2018, we elected early adoption of ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive 
Income. Accordingly, we reclassified stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA from accumulated other comprehensive loss 
to retained earnings, related to our employee benefit plans and commodity contracts cash flow hedges.

The following tables provide: (a) the components of income tax expense in 2018, 2017, and 2016; (b) the reconciliation between 
the  statutory  federal  income  tax  rate  and  the  effective  income  tax  rate  for  2018,  2017,  and  2016;  and  (c) the  components  of 
accumulated deferred income tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

For the Year Ended December 31,
2017

2016

2018

(in thousands)
Current Income Tax Expense

Federal
State
Other

Total current income tax expense
Deferred Income Tax Expense (1)

Property, plant and equipment
Deferred gas costs
Pensions and other employee benefits
FPU merger-related premium cost and deferred gain
Net operating loss carryforwards
Other

Total deferred income tax expense
Total Income Tax Expense

$

$

(845) $
660
(47)
(232)

19,164
(1,435)
463
(528)
(331)
3,893
21,226
20,994

$

$

2,803
492
(71)
3,224

8,314
2,002
180
(1,148)
193
1,544
11,085
14,309

$

(4,898)
2,053
(71)
(2,916)

31,062
1,163
237
(572)
(9)
(624)
31,257
28,341

 (1) Includes $3.5 million, $873,000 and $2.1 million of deferred state income taxes for the years 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 76

 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)
Reconciliation of Effective Income Tax Rates
Federal income tax expense (1)
State income taxes, net of federal benefit

ESOP dividend deduction

Revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities

Other

For the Year Ended December 31,
2017

2016

2018

$

16,291

$

25,351

$

22,759

4,088

(158)

—

773

1,894
(257)
(14,299)
1,620

3,422
(264)
—

2,424

Total Income Tax Expense
Effective Income Tax Rate (2)
(1) Federal income taxes were calculated at 21 percent for 2018 and 35 percent for 2017 and 2016.
(2)Effective tax rate 2017 includes the impact of the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities for our unregulated businesses due to implementation of the 
TCJA.

27.06%

38.81%

19.75%

20,994

14,309

28,341

$

$

$

(in thousands)
Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred income tax liabilities:

Property, plant and equipment
Acquisition adjustment
Loss on reacquired debt
Deferred gas costs
Natural gas conversion costs
Other

Total deferred income tax liabilities
Deferred income tax assets:

Pension and other employee benefits
Environmental costs
Net operating loss carryforwards
Self-insurance
Storm reserve liability
Other

Total deferred income tax assets

Deferred Income Taxes Per Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31,
2017
2018

$

$

153,423
8,896
32
1,139
3,987
2,641
170,118

3,711
1,710
2,010
151
—
5,716
13,298
156,820

$

$

133,581
9,323
153
2,574
2,760
2,662
151,053

4,698
1,744
1,625
164
717
6,255
15,203
135,850

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 77

 
 
 
 
 
 
13. LONG-TERM DEBT

Our outstanding long-term debt is shown below:

(in thousands)
FPU secured first mortgage bonds:
9.08% bond, due June 1, 2022

Uncollateralized Senior Notes:

5.50% note, due October 12, 2020
5.93% note, due October 31, 2023
5.68% note, due June 30, 2026
6.43% note, due May 2, 2028
3.73% note, due December 16, 2028
3.88% note, due May 15, 2029
3.25% note, due April 30, 2032
       3.48% note, due May 31, 2038
       3.58% note, due November 30, 2038
Term Note due January 21, 2020 (1)
Promissory notes
Capital lease obligations
Less: debt issuance costs
Total long-term debt
Less: current maturities
Total long-term debt, net of current maturities

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

As of December 31,

2018

2017

$

7,986

$

7,982

4,000
15,000
23,200
7,000
20,000
50,000
70,000
50,000
50,000
30,000
26
1,310
(567)
327,955
(11,935)
316,020

$

6,000
18,000
26,100
7,000
20,000
50,000
70,000
—
—
—
97
2,070
(433)
206,816
(9,421)
197,395

$

(1) 

In December of 2018 we issued a $30.0 million unsecured Term Note through PNC Bank N.A. The maturity date of the Term Note is January 21, 2020. The 

Term Note bears interest at a rate equal to the one month LIBOR rate plus 75 basis points. The interest rate at December 31, 2018 was 3.23% 

Annual maturities

Annual maturities and principal repayments of long-term debt, excluding the capital lease obligation, are as follows:

Year
(in thousands)
Payments

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Thereafter

Total

$

10,626

$

45,600

$

13,600

$

25,100

$

20,600

$

211,700

$ 327,226

See Note 15, Lease Obligations, for future payments related to the capital lease obligation.

Shelf Agreements

We have entered into Shelf Agreements with Prudential, MetLife and NYL who are under no obligation to purchase any unsecured 
debt. 

The Prudential Shelf Agreement totaling $150.0 million was entered in October 2015 and we issued $70.0 million of 3.25 percent
unsecured debt in April 2017. The Prudential Shelf Agreement was amended in September 2018 to increase the borrowing capacity 
to $150.0 million after which Prudential accepted our request to purchase our unsecured debt of $100.0 million at an interest rate 
of 3.98 percent on or before August 20, 2019.   The NYL Shelf Agreement totaling $100.0 million was entered in March 2017 
and we issued unsecured debt totaling $100.0 million during 2018. The NYL Shelf Agreement was amended in November 2018 
to provide additional borrowing capacity of $50.0 million.  As of December 31, 2018, we had not requested that MetLife purchase 
unsecured senior debt under the MetLife Shelf Agreement. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 78

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table summarizes our shelf agreements borrowing information at December 31, 2018:

(in thousands)

Shelf Agreement

Prudential Shelf Agreement

MetLife Shelf Agreement

NYL Shelf Agreement

Total

Total
Borrowing
Capacity

Less Amount
of Debt
Issued

Less Unfunded
Commitments

Remaining
Borrowing
Capacity

$

$

220,000

$

150,000

150,000

520,000

$

(70,000) $
—
(100,000)
(170,000) $

(100,000) $

—

—

(100,000) $

50,000

150,000

50,000

250,000

The Prudential Shelf Agreement and the NYL Shelf Agreement set forth certain business covenants to which we are subject when 
any note is outstanding, including covenants that limit or restrict our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to incur indebtedness, 
or place or permit liens and encumbrances on any of our property or the property of our subsidiaries.

Secured First Mortgage Bonds 

We guaranteed FPU’s first mortgage bonds, which are secured by a lien covering all of FPU’s property. FPU’s first mortgage 
bonds contain a restriction that limits the payment of dividends by FPU to an amount less than the sum of $2.5 million plus FPU’s 
consolidated net income accrued on and after January 1, 1992. As of December 31, 2018, FPU’s cumulative net income base was 
$155.8 million, offset by restricted payments of $37.6 million, leaving $118.2 million of available dividend capacity. 

The dividend restrictions in FPU’s first mortgage bonds resulted in approximately $42.2 million of the net assets of our consolidated 
subsidiaries being restricted at December 31, 2018. This represents approximately 8.1 percent of our consolidated net assets. Other 
than the dividend restrictions associated with FPU’s first mortgage bonds, there are no legal, contractual or regulatory restrictions 
on the net assets of our subsidiaries.

Uncollateralized Senior Notes

All of our uncollateralized Senior Notes require periodic principal and interest payments as specified in each note. They also 
contain various restrictions. The most stringent restrictions state that we must maintain equity of at least 40.0 percent of total 
capitalization, and the fixed charge coverage ratio must be at least 1.2 times. The most recent Senior Notes issued in December 
2013 also contain a restriction that we must maintain an aggregate net book value in our regulated business assets of at least 50.0 
percent  of  our  consolidated  total  assets.  Failure  to  comply  with  those  covenants  could  result  in  accelerated  due  dates  and/or 
termination of the Senior Note agreements.  

Certain uncollateralized Senior Notes contain a “restricted payments” covenant as defined in the respective note agreements. The 
most restrictive covenants of this type are included within the 5.93 percent Senior Note, due October 31, 2023. The covenant 
provides that we cannot pay or declare any dividends or make any other restricted payments in excess of the sum of $10.0 million, 
plus our consolidated net income accrued on and after January 1, 2003. As of December 31, 2018, the cumulative consolidated 
net income base was $444.3 million, offset by restricted payments of $201.5 million, leaving $242.8 million of cumulative net 
income free of restrictions. As of December 31, 2018, we are in compliance with all of our debt covenants.

14. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, we had $294.5 million and $251.0 million, respectively, of short-term borrowings outstanding 
at the weighted average interest rates of 3.44 percent and 2.42 percent, respectively.  We have an aggregate of $370.0 million in 
credit lines comprised of five unsecured bank credit facilities with four financial institutions, with $220.0 million in total available 
credit, and a Revolver with five participating Lenders totaling $150.0 million. All of these facilities expire on October 31, 2019
with the exception of the Revolver which is available through October 8, 2020. We incurred commitment fees of $93,300, $131,000
and $145,000 in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The following table summarizes our short-term borrowing facilities information 
at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 79

(in thousands)

Bank Credit Facility

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Outstanding borrowings at

Total
Facility

LIBOR Based
Interest Rate

December 31,
2018

December 31,
2017

Available at
December
31, 2018

Committed revolving credit facility A

$

55,000

Committed revolving credit facility B

Short-term revolving credit note C

Committed revolving credit facility D

Committed revolving credit facility E

Committed revolving credit facility F(2)

Total short term credit facilities
Book overdrafts(1)

Total short-term borrowing

plus 1.00
percent

 plus 1.00
percent

 plus 0.80
percent

 plus 0.85
percent

 plus 0.85
percent

30,000

50,000

45,000

40,000

150,000

 plus up to 1.25
percent

$

370,000

$

25,000 $

55,000 $

30,000

15,431

20,500

14,569

50,000

50,000

—

34,672

40,171

10,328

40,000

—

—

125,000

75,000

290,103 $

240,671 $

25,000

79,897

4,355

10,298

294,458 $

250,969

$

$

(1)

 If presented, these book overdrafts would be funded through the bank revolving credit facilities.

(2) 

This committed revolving credit facility includes a restriction that our short-term borrowings, excluding any borrowings under the committed revolving 

credit facility, shall not exceed $200.0 million. 

.

We are authorized by our Board of Directors to borrow up to $350.0 million of short-term debt, as required, from these short-term 
lines of credit. These bank credit facilities are available to provide funds for our short-term cash needs to meet seasonal working 
capital requirements and to temporarily fund portions of our capital expenditures.

The availability of funds under our credit facilities is subject to conditions specified in the respective credit agreements, all of 
which we currently satisfy. These conditions include our compliance with financial covenants and the continued accuracy of 
representations and warranties contained in these agreements. We are required by the financial covenants in our revolving credit 
facilities to maintain, at the end of each fiscal year, a funded indebtedness ratio of no greater than 65 percent. We are in compliance 
with all of our debt covenants.

15. LEASE OBLIGATIONS

We have entered into several operating lease arrangements for office space, land, equipment and pipeline facilities. Rent expense 
related to these leases for 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $3.8 million, $3.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 
2018, future minimum payments under our current lease agreements are as follows:

Year(s)
(in thousands)

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Thereafter

Total

Expected payments

$2,349

$1,998

$1,761

$1,689

$1,642

$5,398

$14,837

For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 we paid $2.4 million ,$1.5 million and $1.5 million respectively, for 
capital lease arrangements related to Sandpiper's capacity, supply and operating agreement and our Mid-Atlantic propane operations' 
lease arrangement for  property in Anne Arundel County, Maryland which it intends to purchase during the first quarter of 2019.  
Future minimum payments under these lease arrangements are $1.3 million in 2019.

16. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)

Defined benefit pension and postretirement plan items, unrealized gains (losses) of our propane swap agreements, call options 
and natural gas futures and swap contracts, designated as commodity contracts cash flow hedges, are the components of our 
accumulated comprehensive income (loss). In 2018, we elected early adoption of ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 80

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. Accordingly, we reclassified stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA 
from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings, related to our employee benefit plans and commodity contracts 
cash flow hedges.

The following table present the changes in the balance of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 
2018 and 2017. All amounts in the following tables are presented net of tax.

(in thousands)
As of December 31, 2016

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)

Net current-period other comprehensive income/(loss)
As of December 31, 2017

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

Net current-period other comprehensive loss

Stranded tax reclassification to retained earnings

As of December 31, 2018

Defined Benefit
Pension and
Postretirement
Plan Items

Commodity
Contracts Cash
Flow Hedges

Total

$

$

(5,360) $
281
336
617
(4,743)
(602)
439
(163)
(1,022)
(5,928) $

$ (4,878)
482
440
159
(170)
166
(11)
606
(4,272)
471
(3,732)
(3,130)
2,198
1,759
(1,534)
(1,371)
(907)
115
(785) $ (6,713)

The following table presents amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended 
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Deferred gains and losses of our commodity contracts cash flow hedges are recognized in 
earnings upon settlement.

(in thousands)
Amortization of defined benefit pension and postretirement plan
items:

 Prior service cost (1)
Net gain (1)

Total before income taxes
       Income tax benefit
Net of tax

Gains and losses on commodity contracts cash flow hedges

Propane swap agreements (2)
Natural gas swaps (2)
Natural gas futures (2)
Total before income taxes
Income tax impact

Net of tax

Total reclassifications for the period

For the Year Ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

$

$

$

$

$

77
(579)
(502)
63
(439)

(647)
197
(2,010)
(2,460)
701
(1,759)

(2,198)

$

$

$

$

$

77
(636)
(559)
223
(336)

1,607
(822)
(456)
329
(159)
170

(166)

$

$

$

$

$

77
(871)
(794)
320
(474)

(322)
—

345
23
(3)
20

(454)

(1) These amounts are included in the computation of net periodic benefits. See Note 17, Employee Benefit Plans, for additional details.
(2) These amounts are included in the effects of gains and losses from derivative instruments. See Note 8, Derivative Instruments, for additional details.

Amortization of defined benefit pension and postretirement plan items is included in other expense, net and gains and losses on 
propane  swap  agreements,  call  options  and  natural  gas  futures  contracts  are  included  in  cost  of  sales  in  the  accompanying 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 81

 
 
consolidated statements of income. The income tax benefit is included in income tax expense in the accompanying consolidated 
statements of income.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

17. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

We measure the assets and obligations of the defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefits plans to determine 
the plans’ funded status as of the end of the year. We record as a component of other comprehensive income/loss or a regulatory 
asset the changes in funded status that occurred during the year that are not recognized as part of net periodic benefit costs.

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

We sponsor three defined benefit pension plans: the Chesapeake Pension Plan, the FPU Pension Plan and the Chesapeake unfunded 
supplemental executive retirement pension plan ("SERP").

The Chesapeake Pension Plan, a qualified plan, was closed to new participants, effective January 1, 1999, and was frozen with 
respect to additional years of service and additional compensation, effective January 1, 2005. Benefits under the Chesapeake 
Pension Plan were based on each participant’s years of service and highest average compensation, prior to the freezing of the plan. 
Active participants on the date the Chesapeake Pension Plan was frozen were credited with two additional years of service. 

The  FPU  Pension  Plan,  a  qualified  plan,  covers  eligible  FPU  non-union  employees  hired  before  January 1,  2005  and  union 
employees hired before the respective union contract expiration dates in 2005 and 2006. Prior to the FPU merger, the FPU Pension 
Plan was frozen with respect to additional years of service and additional compensation, effective December 31, 2009. 

The Chesapeake SERP, a nonqualified plan, is comprised of two sub-plans.  The first sub-plan was frozen with respect to additional 
years of service and additional compensation as of December 31, 2004. Benefits under the Chesapeake SERP were based on each 
participant’s years of service and highest average compensation, prior to the freezing of the plan. Active participants on the date 
the Chesapeake SERP was frozen were credited with two additional years of service.  The second sub-plan provides fixed payments 
for several executives who joined the Company as a result of an acquisition and whose agreements with the Company provided 
for this benefit. 

The unfunded liability for all three plans at both December 31, 2018 and 2017, is included in the other pension and benefit costs 
liability in our consolidated balance sheets.  

The following schedule sets forth the funded status at December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the net periodic cost for the years ended 
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 for the Chesapeake and FPU Pension Plans as well as the Chesapeake SERP:

At December 31,
(in thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:

Benefit obligation — beginning of year

Interest cost
Actuarial loss (gain)
Benefits paid

Benefit obligation — end of year

Change in plan assets:

Fair value of plan assets — beginning of year

Actual return on plan assets
Employer contributions
Benefits paid

Fair value of plan assets — end of year

Reconciliation:

Funded status
Accrued pension cost
Assumptions:

Chesapeake
Pension Plan

FPU
Pension Plan

Chesapeake
SERP

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

$11,443
384
(610)
(505)
10,712

$ 11,355
402
454
(768)
11,443

$ 64,664
2,339
(4,739)
(2,887)
59,377

$ 63,832
2,482
1,199
(2,849)
64,664

$ 2,428
83
(74)
(152)
2,285

$ 2,428
89
63
(152)
2,428

9,350
(647)
451
(505)
8,649

8,668
1,144
306
(768)
9,350

48,396
(3,113)
1,205
(2,887)
43,601

43,272
6,025
1,948
(2,849)
48,396

—
—
152
(152)
—

—
—
152
(152)
—

(2,063)
$ (2,063)

(2,093)
$ (2,093)

(15,776)
$ (15,776)

(16,268)
$(16,268)

(2,285)
$ (2,285)

(2,428)
$ (2,428)

Discount rate
Expected return on plan assets

4.00%
6.00%

3.50%
6.00%

4.25%
6.50%

3.75%
6.50%

4.00%
—%

3.50%
—%

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 82

 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended
December 31,
(in thousands)
Components of net periodic
pension cost:

Interest cost
Expected return on assets
Amortization of actuarial loss

Settlement expense
Net periodic pension cost(1)

Amortization of pre-merger
regulatory asset
Total periodic cost
Assumptions:

Discount rate
Expected return on plan
assets

Chesapeake
Pension Plan

FPU
Pension Plan

Chesapeake
SERP

2018

2017

2016

2018

2017

2016

2018

2017

2016

$ 384
(542)

343
—
185

$ 402
(495)
399
—
306

$ 421
(501)
459
161
540

$ 2,339
(3,091)

404
—
(348)

$ 2,482
(2,779)
513
—
216

$ 2,525
(2,702)
519
—
342

$ 83
—

101

$ 89
—
87

$ 91

87

184

176

178

—
$ 185

—
$ 306

—
$ 540

761
$ 413

761
$ 977

761
$ 1,103

—
$ 184

—
$ 176

—
$ 178

3.50% 3.75% 3.75%

3.75% 4.00%

4.00% 3.50% 3.75 % 3.75 %

6.00% 6.00% 6.00%

6.50% 6.50%

6.50%

—%

—%

—%

(1) As a result of our adoption of ASU 2017-07 on January 1, 2018, the "other than service" cost components of the net periodic costs have been recorded or 
reclassified to other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income.

Included in the net periodic costs for the FPU Pension Plan is continued amortization of the FPU pension regulatory asset, which 
represents  the  portion  attributable to  FPU's  regulated  operations  for  the  changes  in  funded  status  that  occurred,  but  were  not 
recognized as part of net periodic cost, prior to the merger with Chesapeake Utilities in October 2009. This was previously deferred 
as a regulatory asset to be recovered through rates pursuant to an order by the Florida PSC. The unamortized balance of this 
regulatory asset was $543,000 and $1.3 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Our funding policy provides that payments to the trustee of each qualified plan shall be equal to at least the minimum funding 
requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The following schedule summarizes the assets of the 
Chesapeake Pension Plan and the FPU Pension Plan, by investment type, at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:

At December 31,
Asset Category

Equity securities
Debt securities
Other

Total

Chesapeake Pension Plan

FPU Pension Plan

2018

2017

2016

2018

2017

2016

49.02%
40.98%
10.00%
100.00%

52.70%
37.79%
9.51%
100.00%

52.93%
37.64%
9.43%
100.00%

50.04%
41.06%
8.90%
100.00%

55.17%
36.56%
8.27%
100.00%

53.18%
37.74%
9.08%
100.00%

The investment policy of both the Chesapeake Utilities and FPU Pension Plans is designed to provide the capital assets necessary 
to meet the financial obligations of the plans. The investment goals and objectives are to achieve investment returns that, together 
with contributions, will provide funds adequate to pay promised benefits to present and future beneficiaries of the plans, earn a 
long-term investment return in excess of the growth of the plans’ retirement liabilities, minimize pension expense and cumulative 
contributions resulting from liability measurement and asset performance, and maintain a diversified portfolio to reduce the risk 
of large losses. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 83

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following allocation range of asset classes is intended to produce a rate of return sufficient to meet the plans’ goals and 
objectives:

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Asset Allocation Strategy

Asset Class
Domestic Equities (Large Cap, Mid Cap and Small Cap)
Foreign Equities (Developed and Emerging Markets)
Fixed Income (Inflation Bond and Taxable Fixed)
Alternative Strategies (Long/Short Equity and Hedge Fund of Funds)
Diversifying Assets (High Yield Fixed Income, Commodities, and Real Estate)
Cash

Minimum Allocation
Percentage

Maximum Allocation
Percentage

14%
13%
26%
6%
7%
0%

32%
25%
40%
14%
19%
5%

Due to periodic contributions and different asset classes producing varying returns, the actual asset values may temporarily move 
outside  of  the  intended  ranges.  The  investments  are  monitored  on  a  quarterly  basis,  at  a  minimum,  for  asset  allocation  and 
performance.  

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the assets of the Chesapeake Pension Plan and the FPU Pension Plan were comprised of the 
following investments:

Asset Category
(in thousands)
Mutual Funds - Equity securities

U.S. Large Cap (1)
U.S. Mid Cap (1)
U.S. Small Cap (1)
International (2)
Alternative Strategies (3)

Mutual Funds - Debt securities

Fixed income (4)
High Yield (4)

Mutual Funds - Other
Commodities (5)
Real Estate (6)
Guaranteed deposit (7)

Total Pension Plan Assets in fair
value hierarchy

Fair Value Measurement Hierarchy

At December 31, 2018

At December 31, 2017

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

$ 3,399

$ — $ — $ 3,399

$ 4,245

$ — $ — $ 4,245

1,478

670

9,226

5,726

20,499

18,630

2,818

21,448

1,902

2,216

—

4,118

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

627

627

1,478

670

9,226

5,726

20,499

18,630

2,818

21,448

1,902

2,216

627

4,745

1,775

918

11,916

5,528

24,382

18,454

2,772

21,226

2,154

2,300

—

4,454

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

436

436

1,775

918

11,916

5,528

24,382

18,454

2,772

21,226

2,154

2,300

436

4,890

$46,065

$ — $

627

46,692

$ 50,062

$ — $

436

50,498

Investments measured at net asset 
value (8)
Total Pension Plan Assets
(1) Includes funds that invest primarily in United States common stocks.
(2) Includes funds that invest primarily in foreign equities and emerging markets equities.
(3) Includes funds that actively invest in both equity and debt securities, funds that sell short securities and funds that provide long-term capital appreciation. The 
funds may invest in debt securities below investment grade.
(4) Includes funds that invest in investment grade and fixed income securities.
(5) Includes funds that invest primarily in commodity-linked derivative instruments and fixed income securities.
(6) Includes funds that invest primarily in real estate.
(7) Includes investment in a group annuity product issued by an insurance company.

$ 57,746

$ 52,250

5,558

7,248

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 84

 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(8) Certain investments that were measured at net asset value per share have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. These amounts are presented to reconcile 
to total pension plan assets.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, all of the investments were classified under the same fair value measurement hierarchy (Level 
1 through Level 3) described under Note 9, Fair Value of Financial Instruments.   The Level 3 investments were recorded at fair 
value  based  on  the  contract  value  of  annuity  products  underlying  guaranteed  deposit  accounts,  which  was  calculated  using 
discounted cash flow models. The contract value of these products represented deposits made to the contract, plus earnings at 
guaranteed crediting rates, less withdrawals and fees. 

The following table sets forth the summary of the changes in the fair value of Level 3 investments for the years ended December 31, 
2018 and 2017:

(in thousands)
Balance, beginning of year

Purchases
Transfers in
Disbursements
Investment income

Balance, end of year

Other Postretirement Benefits Plans

For the Year Ended December 31,

2018

2017

$

$

436
1,674
2,375
(3,872)
14
627

$

$

498
2,271
1,743
(4,101)
25
436

We sponsor two defined benefit postretirement health plans: the Chesapeake Postretirement Plan and the FPU Medical Plan. 
The following table sets forth the funded status at December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the net periodic cost for the years ended 
December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:

At December 31,
(in thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:

Benefit obligation — beginning of year

$

Interest cost
Plan participants contributions
Actuarial loss (gain)
Benefits paid

Benefit obligation — end of year

Change in plan assets:

Fair value of plan assets — beginning of year

Employer contributions(1)
Plan participants contributions
Benefits paid

Fair value of plan assets — end of year

Reconciliation:

Funded status

Accrued postretirement cost
Assumptions:

Discount rate

Chesapeake
Postretirement Plan
2017
2018

FPU
Medical Plan

2018

2017

$

1,128
38
136
(131)
(169)
1,002

—

33
136
(169)
—

$

1,132
41
118
72
(235)
1,128

—
117
118
(235)
—

$

1,287
47
41
(89)
(99)
1,187

—

58
41
(99)
—

1,349
50
48
(48)
(112)
1,287

—
64
48
(112)
—

(1,002)
(1,002)

$

(1,128)
(1,128)

$

(1,187)
(1,187)

$

(1,287)
(1,287)

$

4.00%

3.50%

4.25%

3.75%

(1) The Chesapeake Postretirement Plan does not receive a Medicare Part-D subsidy. The FPU Medical Plan did not receive a significant subsidy for the post-
merger period.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 85

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net periodic postretirement benefit costs for 2018, 2017, and 2016 include the following components:

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
Components of net periodic
postretirement cost:
Interest cost
Amortization of actuarial loss
Amortization of prior service cost
(credit)
Net periodic cost

Amortization of pre-merger regulatory
asset

Total periodic cost(1)
Assumptions

Discount rate

Chesapeake
Postretirement Plan
2017

2018

2016

2018

FPU
Medical Plan
2017

2016

$

$

38
58

(77)
19

—
19

$

$

41
53

(77)
17

—
17

$

$

43
64

(77)
30

—
30

$

$

47
—

—
47

8
55

$

$

50
—

—
50

8
58

$

$

55
—

—
55

8
63

3.50%

3.75%

3.75%

3.75%

4.00%

4.00%

(1) As a result of our adoption of ASU 2017-07 on January 1, 2018, the "other than service" cost components of the net periodic costs have been recorded or 
reclassified to other income (expense), net in the condensed consolidated statements of income.

Similar to the FPU Pension Plan, continued amortization of the FPU Medical Plan regulatory asset related to the unrecognized 
cost prior to the merger with Chesapeake Utilities was included in the net periodic cost. The unamortized balance of this regulatory 
asset was $14,000 and $22,000 at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The  following  table  presents  the  amounts  not  yet  reflected  in  net  periodic  benefit  cost  and  included  in  accumulated  other 
comprehensive loss or as a regulatory asset as of December 31, 2018:

(in thousands)
Prior service cost (credit)

Net loss (gain)

Total

Accumulated other comprehensive loss 
(gain) pre-tax(1)
Post-merger regulatory asset

Subtotal

Pre-merger regulatory asset

Total unrecognized cost

$

$

$

Chesapeake
Pension
Plan

FPU
Pension
Plan

Chesapeake
SERP

Chesapeake
Postretirement
Plan

FPU
Medical
Plan

— $

— $

— $

3,865

18,544

3,865

$

18,544

$

559

559

$

(524) $
578

54

$

3,865

$

3,523

$

559

$

—

3,865
—

15,021

18,544
543

$

3,865

$

19,087

$

—

559
—

559

$

54

—

54
—

54

$

$

Total

(524)
23,467

22,943

7,986

14,957

22,943
557

23,500

— $
(79)
(79) $

(15) $
(64)
(79)
14
(65) $

(1) The total amount of accumulated other comprehensive loss recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 is net of income tax benefits 
of $2.1 million.

Pursuant  to  a  Florida  PSC  order,  FPU  continues  to  record  as  a  regulatory  asset  a  portion  of  the  unrecognized  pension  and 
postretirement benefit costs after the merger with Chesapeake Utilities related to its regulated operations, which is included in the 
above table as a post-merger regulatory asset.  FPU also continues to maintain and amortize a portion of the unrecognized pension 
and postretirement benefit costs prior to the merger with Chesapeake Utilities related to its regulated operations, which is shown 
as a pre-merger regulatory asset.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 86

 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 Assumptions

The assumptions used for the discount rate to calculate the benefit obligations were based on the interest rates of high-quality 
bonds in 2018, considering the expected lives of each of the plans. In determining the average expected return on plan assets for 
each applicable plan, various factors, such as historical long-term return experience, investment policy and current and expected 
allocation, were considered. Since Chesapeake Utilities' plans and FPU’s plans have different expected plan lives, particularly in 
light of the lump-sum-payment option provided in the Chesapeake Pension Plan, different assumptions regarding discount rate 
and expected return on plan assets were selected for Chesapeake Utilities' and FPU’s plans. Since both pension plans are frozen 
with respect to additional years of service and compensation, the rate of assumed compensation increases is not applicable. 

The  health care  inflation  rate for  2018  used  to  calculate the  benefit  obligation is  5.0  percent  for  medical  and  6.0  percent  for 
prescription drugs for the Chesapeake Postretirement Plan; and 5.0 percent for both medical and prescription drugs for the FPU 
Medical Plan. 

Estimated Future Benefit Payments

In 2019, we expect to contribute $163,000 and $1.2 million to the Chesapeake Pension Plan and FPU Pension Plan, respectively, 
and $383,000 to the Chesapeake SERP. We also expect to contribute $96,000 and $94,000 to the Chesapeake Postretirement Plan 
and FPU Medical Plan, respectively, in 2019. 

The schedule below shows the estimated future benefit payments for each of the plans previously described:

(in thousands)
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Years 2024 through 2028

Chesapeake Pension
Plan

(1)

FPU Pension
Plan

(1)

Chesapeake
SERP

(2)

Chesapeake
Postretirement
Plan

(2)

FPU
Medical
(2)
Plan

$
$
$
$
$
$

528
529
736
595
1,244
3,866

$
$
$
$
$
$

3,091
3,221
3,299
3,485
3,558
18,570

$
$
$
$
$
$

383
150
148
147
145
744

$
$
$
$
$
$

96
85
82
81
64
275

$
$
$
$
$
$

94
87
91
93
80
402

(1) The pension plan is funded; therefore, benefit payments are expected to be paid out of the plan assets.
(2) Benefit payments are expected to be paid out of our general funds.

Retirement Savings Plan

For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we sponsored a 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan. This plan is offered to 
all  eligible  employees  who  have  completed  three  months  of  service.  We  match  100  percent  of  eligible  participants’  pre-tax 
contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan up to a maximum of six percent of eligible compensation. The employer matching 
contribution is made in cash and is invested based on a participant’s investment directions. In addition, we may make a discretionary 
supplemental  contribution  to  participants  in  the  plan,  without  regard  to  whether  or  not  they  make  pre-tax  contributions. Any 
supplemental employer contribution is generally made in our common stock. With respect to the employer match and supplemental 
employer contribution, employees are 100 percent vested after two years of service or upon reaching 55 years of age while still 
employed by us.  New employees who do not make an election to contribute and do not opt out of the Retirement Savings Plan 
will be automatically enrolled at a deferral rate of three percent, and the automatic deferral rate will increase by one percent per 
year up to a maximum of ten percent.  All contributions and matched funds can be invested among the mutual funds available for 
investment. 

Employer contributions to our Retirement Savings Plan totaled $5.5 million, $5.0 million, and $4.5 million for the years ended 
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, there were 831,183 shares of our common stock 
reserved to fund future contributions to the Retirement Savings Plan.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan

Members of our Board of Directors, and officers designated by the Compensation Committee, are eligible to participate in the 
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. Directors can elect to defer any portion of their cash or stock compensation and 
officers can defer up to 80 percent of their base compensation, cash bonuses or any amount of their stock bonuses (net of required 
withholdings).  Officers  may  receive  a  matching  contribution  on  their  cash  compensation  deferrals  up  to  six  percent  of  their 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 87

 
 
 
 
 
compensation, provided it does not duplicate a match they receive in the Retirement Savings Plan. Stock bonuses are not eligible 
for matching contributions. Participants are able to elect the payment of deferred compensation to begin on a specified future date 
or upon separation from service.  Additionally, participants can elect to receive payments upon the earlier or later of a fixed date 
or separation from service.  The payments can be made in one lump sum or annual installments for up to 15 years.  

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

All obligations arising under the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan are payable from our general assets, although we 
have established a Rabbi Trust to informally fund the plan. Deferrals of cash compensation may be invested by the participants in 
various mutual funds (the same options that are available in the Retirement Savings Plan). The participants are credited with gains 
or losses on those investments. Deferred stock compensation may not be diversified. The participants are credited with dividends 
on our common stock in the same amount that is received by all other stockholders. Such dividends are reinvested into our common 
stock. Assets held in the Rabbi Trust, recorded as Investments on the consolidated balance sheet, had a fair value of $6.7 million 
at both December 31, 2018 and 2017. (See Note 10, Investments, for further details). The assets of the Rabbi Trust are at all times 
subject to the claims of our general creditors. 

Deferrals of officer base compensation and cash bonuses and directors’ cash retainers are paid in cash. All deferrals of executive 
performance shares, which represent deferred stock units, and directors’ stock retainers are paid in shares of our common stock, 
except that cash is paid in lieu of fractional shares. The value of our stock held in the Rabbi Trust is classified within the stockholders’ 
equity section of the consolidated balance sheets and has been accounted for in a manner similar to treasury stock. The amounts 
recorded under the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan totaled $3.9 million and $3.4 million at December 31, 2018 and 
2017, respectively, which are also shown as a deduction against stockholders' equity in the consolidated balance sheet. 

18. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

Our non-employee directors and key employees have been granted share-based awards through our SICP. We record these share-
based awards as compensation costs over the respective service period for which services are received in exchange for an award 
of equity or equity-based compensation. The compensation cost is based primarily on the fair value of the shares awarded, using 
the estimated fair value of each share on the date it was granted and the number of shares to be issued at the end of the service 
period. We have 475,099 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the SICP. 

The table below presents the amounts included in net income related to share-based compensation expense for the awards granted 
under the SICP for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:

For the Year Ended December 31,
2017

2016

2018

(in thousands)
Awards to non-employee directors
Awards to key employees
Total compensation expense
Less: tax benefit
Share-based compensation amounts included in net income

Stock Options

$

$

539
2,871
3,410
(934)
2,476

$

$

540
1,950
2,490
(1,003)
1,487

$

$

580
1,787
2,367
(952)
1,415

There were no stock options outstanding at December 31, 2018 or 2017, nor were any stock options issued during the years 2016
through 2018.

Non-employee Directors

Shares granted to non-employee directors are issued in advance of these directors’ service periods and are fully vested as of the 
date of the grant. We record a prepaid expense equal to the fair value of the shares issued and amortize the expense equally over 
a service period of one year.  In May 2017, each of our non-employee directors received an annual retainer of 835 shares of 
common stock under the SICP for board service through the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; as a group, 7,515 shares, with 
a weighted average fair value of $71.80, were issued and vested in 2017.  In May 2018, each of our non-employee directors 
received an annual retainer of 792 shares of common stock under the SICP for board service through the 2019 Annual Meeting 
of Stockholders; accordingly, 7,128 shares, with a weighted average fair value of $75.70, were issued and vested in 2018. 

The intrinsic values of the shares granted to our non-employee directors are equal to the fair value of these awards on the date of 
grant. At December 31, 2018, there was $180,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to these awards. This expense 
will be fully recognized by April 2019, which approximates the expected remaining service period of those directors.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 88

 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Key Employees

Our Compensation Committee is authorized to grant our key employees the right to receive awards of shares of our common stock, 
contingent upon the achievement of established performance goals and subject to SEC transfer restrictions once awarded.

We currently have several outstanding multi-year performance plans, which are based upon the successful achievement of long-
term goals, growth and financial results and comprise both market-based and performance-based conditions or targets. The fair 
value per share, tied to a performance-based condition or target, is equal to the market price per share on the grant date. For the 
market-based conditions, we used the Black-Scholes pricing model to estimate the fair value of each share granted.

The table below presents the summary of the stock activity for awards to key employees:

Outstanding — December 31, 2016
   Granted
   Vested
   Expired
Outstanding — December 31, 2017
   Granted
   Vested

Vested - Accelerated pursuant to separation agreement (1)

   Expired
Outstanding — December 31, 2018
(1) Includes 2,569 shares that were forfeited

Number of
Shares

Weighted Average
Fair Value

115,091
$
$
52,355
(32,926) $
(1,878) $
$
132,642
49,494
$
(29,786) $
(16,676) $
(3,933) $
$

131,741

51.85
63.42
38.88
39.97
59.31
67.76
47.39
75.78
49.66
67.24

The intrinsic value of these awards was $10.7 million, $10.4 million and $7.7 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. At 
December 31, 2018, there was $2.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to these awards, which is expected to be 
recognized during 2019 through 2020.

In 2018, 2017 and 2016, we withheld shares with a value at least equivalent to the employees’ minimum statutory obligation for 
the applicable income and other employment taxes, and remitted the cash to the appropriate taxing authorities with the executives 
electing to receive the net shares. The below table presents the number of shares withheld, amounts remitted to taxing authorities 
and the tax benefits associated with these obligations: 

For the Year Ended December 31,
2017

2016

2018

(amounts except shares, in thousands)

Shares withheld to satisfy tax obligations

Amounts remitted to tax authorities to satisfy obligations

Tax benefit associated with settlement of share based payments

10,436
1,210

$
— $

10,269

$

692

349

12,031

770

285

$

$

In  June  2018,  the  Company  and  a  former  executive  officer  entered  into  a  separation  agreement  and  release  (the  "Separation 
Agreement").  Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, three awards, representing a total of 14,107 shares of common stock previously 
granted to the executive officer under the SICP, immediately vested at the time of separation, and an additional 2,569 shares were 
forfeited. We settled the awards that vested in cash and recognized $1.1 million as share-based compensation expense. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 89

19. RATES AND OTHER REGULATORY ACTIVITIES 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Our natural gas and electric distribution operations in Delaware, Maryland and Florida are subject to regulation by their respective 
PSC; Eastern Shore, our natural gas transmission subsidiary, is subject to regulation by the FERC; and Peninsula Pipeline, our 
intrastate pipeline subsidiary, is subject to regulation by the Florida PSC. 

Delaware
Underserved Area Rates:  In December 2017, we filed an application requesting authorization to utilize existing expansion area 
tariff rates to serve customers located outside of the current Sussex County, Delaware expansion area boundaries that cannot be 
economically served under the regular tariff rates.  In June 2018, we reached a settlement agreement with the relevant parties, 
which allows us to utilize higher rates for areas outside of our existing expansion area. The Delaware PSC unanimously approved 
the settlement at its public meeting on July 10, 2018. The new rate schedule became effective on August 1, 2018.

CGS:    In  June  2018,  we  filed  with  the  Delaware  PSC  an  application  requesting  approval  of  the  acquisition,  and  subsequent 
conversion  to  natural  gas  of  certain  CGS  located  within  our  service  territory.  We  requested  the  establishment  of  regulatory 
accounting treatment and valuation of the proposed acquisition, approval of a methodology to set new distribution rates for CGS 
customers and approval of a new system-wide tariff rate that will recover CGS conversion costs. The application included a request 
that the Delaware PSC regulate the propane CGS systems after their acquisition but before conversion to natural gas.  In late 2018, 
the Delaware PSC ruled that it did not have jurisdiction over these propane CGS systems and could not approve the methodology 
given the lack of jurisdiction.  We are considering proposing legislation to clarify the Delaware PSC jurisdiction or we may redesign 
the application and re-file.

Effect of the TCJA on customers: The Delaware PSC issued an order requiring all rate-regulated utilities to: (i) file estimates of 
the impact of the TCJA on their cost of service for the most recent test year available (including new rate schedules), and (ii) 
propose procedures for changing rates to reflect those impacts on or before March 31, 2018.  In addition, on February 1, 2018, 
the Delaware PSC issued an order requiring Delaware rate-regulated public utilities to accrue regulatory liabilities reflecting the 
impacts of changes in the federal corporate income tax laws.  In compliance with the Delaware PSC order, we have established a 
regulatory liability to reflect the estimated impacts of the changes in the federal corporate income tax rate. On May 31, 2018, our 
Delaware Division filed the information requested by the PSC, including an updated report reflecting the impact of the TCJA.  On 
January 31, 2019, the Delaware PSC approved the as-filed Delaware Division Delivery Service Rates reflecting the impact of the 
TCJA.  The new rates will go into effect March 1, 2019, and the Company will have to complete refunds back to February 2018, 
per the Commission’s previous order, by June 30, 2019.  The order also provides for a line item billing credit to go into effect on 
April 1, 2019, for the return of the excess deferred income taxes.  Additional information on the TCJA impact is included in the 
table at the end of this Note 19, Rates and Other Regulatory Activities.

Maryland 

Effect of the TCJA on customers: In April 2018, the Maryland PSC issued orders related to the TCJA impact on both the 
Maryland Division and Sandpiper operations.  Please see the actions taken in conjunction with these orders in the TCJA table at 
the end of this Note 19, Rates and Other Regulatory Activities.  Additionally, if in the future the Maryland Division or 
Sandpiper identifies any additional tax savings, we must submit an additional filing to the Maryland PSC in order to return 
those savings to customers as soon as possible.  

Florida

Florida Electric Reliability/Modernization Pilot Program:  In July 2017, our Florida electric operations filed a petition with the 
Florida PSC requesting approval to include $15.2 million of certain capital project expenditures in its rate base and to adjust its 
base rates accordingly. These expenditures are designed to improve the stability and safety of the electric system, while enhancing 
the capability of our electrical grid. In December 2017, the Florida PSC approved this petition, effective January 1, 2018. The 
settlement agreement prescribed the methodology for adjusting the new rates based on the lower federal income tax rate and the 
process and methodology regarding the refund of deferred income taxes, reclassified as a regulatory liability, as a result of the 
TCJA. More details about this methodology are included in the table at the end of this Note 19, Rates and Other Regulatory 
Activities.

Electric Limited Proceeding-Storm Recovery:  In February 2018, FPU filed a petition with the Florida PSC, requesting recovery 
of incremental storm restoration costs related to several hurricanes and tropical storms, along with the replenishment of the storm 
reserve to its pre-storm level of $1.5 million. As a result of these hurricanes and tropical storms, FPU’s storm reserve was depleted 
and, at the time of this filing, had a deficit of $779,000. We requested approval of a surcharge of $1.82 per kilowatt hour for two
years to recover storm-related costs and replenish the storm reserve.  FPU filed written testimony on this matter in August 2018.  
This matter was heard before the Florida PSC in December 2018, final legal briefs were submitted and, on January 14, 2019, and 
is scheduled for approval at Agenda on March 5, 2019. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 90

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

In October 2018, Hurricane Michael passed through Florida Public Utilities Company's (“FPU”) electric distribution operation's 
service territory in Northwest Florida. The hurricane caused widespread and severe damage to FPU's infrastructure resulting in 
100 percent of its customers losing electrical service. FPU has restored service to those customers who were able to accept service 
following Hurricane Michael after a significant hurricane restoration effort.   In conjunction with restoring these services, FPU 
expended over $60.0 million to restore service, which has been recorded as new plant and equipment or charged against FPU’s 
storm reserve.  We are preparing the necessary regulatory filings to seek recovery for the costs incurred, including replenishment 
of FPU's storm reserve.  In conjunction with the hurricane-related expenditures, we executed two 13-month unsecured term loans 
as temporary financing, each in the amount of $30.0 million.  The interest cost associated with these loans is LIBOR plus 75 basis 
points.  One of the term loans was executed in December 2018 and the other was executed in January 2019.  The storm did not 
have a material impact on the Company’s financial results in 2018, and is not expected to have a significant impact going forward 
assuming reasonable regulatory treatment.

Effect of the TCJA on customers: In February 2018, the Florida PSC opened dockets to consider the impacts associated with the 
TCJA.  In May 2018, FPU’s natural gas division filed petitions and supporting testimony regarding the disposition of the related 
impacts of the TCJA.  Hearings on this matter took place in November 2018, The Florida PSC approved staff’s recommendations 
on  February  5,  2019.  Final  orders  were  issued  on  February  25,  2019,  and  are  subject  to  a  30-day  appeal  period.    Staff’s 
recommendations are summarized in the table at the end of this Note 19, Rates and Other Regulatory Activities.

Eastern Shore
2017 Expansion Project: In October 2017, the FERC issued a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity authorizing Eastern 
Shore to construct this project, the largest expansion in Eastern Shore's history. The facilities include approximately 23 miles of 
pipeline  looping  in  Pennsylvania,  Maryland  and  Delaware;  upgrades  to  existing  metering  facilities  in  Lancaster  County, 
Pennsylvania; installation of an additional compressor unit at Eastern Shore’s existing Daleville compressor station in Chester 
County, Pennsylvania; and approximately 17 miles of new mainline extension and two pressure control stations in Sussex County, 
Delaware. Eastern Shore entered into precedent agreements with seven existing customers, including three affiliates of Chesapeake 
Utilities, for a total of 61,162 Dts/d of additional firm natural gas transportation service on Eastern Shore’s pipeline system and 
an additional 52,500 Dts/d of firm transportation service at certain Eastern Shore receipt facilities. 

The first phase of the project was placed into service in December 2017 and, as of December 31, 2018, we have substantially 
completed construction.  The TETLP interconnect upgrade was placed into service in December 2017, and the Fair Hill Loop, the 
Jennersville Loop, the Daleville Compressor Station, the Seaford-Millsboro Connector, and the Millsboro Pressure Control Station 
were placed into service at various dates in 2018.  The Parkesburg Loop was placed into service in January 2019.  The few remaining 
segments are expected to be placed into service in various phases during the first half of 2019.

2017 Rate Case Filing: In January 2017, Eastern Shore filed a base rate proceeding with the FERC.  In August 2017, Eastern 
Shore implemented the proposed new rates, subject to refund, based on the outcome of the rate proceeding.  Eastern Shore recorded 
incremental revenue of approximately $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, and established a regulatory liability 
to reserve a portion of the total incremental revenues generated by the new rates pending FERC approval of a settlement agreement 
and refunds to customers according to the terms of the settlement. The FERC approved the settlement agreement in February 
2018, and it became final in March 2018.  In April 2018, Eastern Shore refunded to its customers, with interest, the difference 
between the proposed rates and the settlement rates.  Exclusive of the TCJA impact, which is discussed below, base rates increased, 
on an annual basis, by approximately $9.8 million. 

Effect of the TCJA on customers: In March 2018, Eastern Shore filed with the FERC its revised base rates, reflecting the reduction 
in its federal corporate income tax rate. These adjusted base rates became effective January 1, 2018 and will generate approximately 
$6.6 million in incremental margin, on an annual basis. Other information about the impact of the TCJA on ESNG has been 
included in the table at the end of this Note 19, Rates and Other Regulatory Activities.

In October 2018, the FERC issued an order granting a waiver to Eastern Shore.  In April 2018, Eastern Shore consummated a 
filing, which included its comments associated with the United Airlines, Inc. vs. FERC proceeding and requested confirmation 
from the FERC that Eastern Shore is not required to provide an informational filing because of its implementation of lower rates 
in accordance with the 2017 rate case settlement agreement. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 91

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Del-Mar Energy Pathway Project:  In September 2018, Eastern Shore filed a Certificate Application with the FERC, requesting 
authorization to construct and operate the Del-Mar Energy Pathway project, which will provide an additional 14,300 Dts/d of 
capacity to four customers.  Facilities to be constructed include six miles of pipeline looping in Delaware; 13 miles of new mainline 
extension in Sussex County, Delaware and Somerset County, Maryland; and new pressure control and delivery stations in these 
counties. The benefits of this project include: (i) further natural gas transmission pipeline infrastructure in eastern Sussex County, 
Delaware, and (ii) extension of Eastern Shore’s pipeline system, for the first time, into Somerset County, Maryland.  During the 
fourth quarter of 2018, the FERC held a full project area scoping meeting in Sussex County, Delaware and issued a Notice of 
Schedule for Environmental Review, indicating issuance of its Environmental Assessment for the Del-Mar Energy Pathway project 
by April 1, 2019.    

Summary TCJA Table

Regulatory Liabilities related to Excess
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes ("ADIT")

Status of Customer Rate impact related to
35 percent to 21 percent rate change

Operation and Regulatory
Jurisdiction

Amount (in
thousands)

Status

Eastern Shore (FERC)

$34,190

Delaware Division
(Delaware PSC)

Maryland Division
(Maryland PSC)

Sandpiper Energy (Maryland
PSC)

Chesapeake Florida Gas
Division/Central Florida Gas
(Florida PSC)

$13,262

$4,211

$3,815

$8,471

Will be addressed in Eastern Shore's
next rate case filing

In January 2019, PSC approved
amortization of ADIT and
corresponding customer rate
reductions effective March 1, 2019.

Implemented one-time bill credit (totaling
$900,000) in April 2018 - Customer rates
adjusted in April, 2018

Customer rates to be adjusted March 1, 2019.
One-time bill credit to be implemented during
the second quarter.

In May 2018, PSC approved
amortization of ADIT and
corresponding customer rate
reductions commenced

In May 2018, PSC approved
amortization of ADIT and
corresponding customer rate
reductions commenced

Implemented one-time bill credit (totaling
$365,000) in July 2018 - Customer rates
adjusted effective May 1, 2018

Implemented one-time bill credit (totaling
$608,000) in July 2018 - Customer rates
adjusted effective May 1, 2018

PSC Staff recommendation issued
on January 24, 2019; final order was
issued on February 25, 2019

PSC Staff recommendation issued on January
24, 2019; final order was issued on February
25, 2019

The order states that the net ADIT
liability would be amortized and
retained by the Company pursuant
to the prescribed schedule

No one-time bill credit or adjustment in rates
would be applied; the tax savings arising from
the TCJA rate reduction would be retained

FPU Natural Gas (includes
FPU, Fort Meade, and
Indiantown) (Florida PSC)

$19,505

PSC Staff recommendation issued
on January 24, 2019;  final order
was issued on February 25, 2019

PSC Staff recommendation issued on January
24, 2019;  final order was issued on February
25, 2019

FPU Electric (Florida PSC)

$5,995

The order states that the net ADIT
liability would be amortized and
retained by the Company pursuant
to the prescribed schedule

In January 2019, PSC approved
amortization of ADIT through
purchased power cost recovery,
storm reserve and rates.

No one-time bill credit or adjustment in rates
would be applied; the tax savings arising from
the TCJA rate reduction would be retained

TCJA benefit will flow back to its customers 
through a combination of reductions to the 
fuel cost recovery rate, base rates, as well as 
application to the storm reserve over the next 
several years

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities

At  December 31,  2018  and  2017,  our  regulated  utility  operations  had  recorded  the  following  regulatory  assets  and  liabilities 
included in our consolidated balance sheets. These assets and liabilities will be recognized as revenues and expenses in future 
periods as they are reflected in customers’ rates.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 92

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands)
Regulatory Assets
Under-recovered purchased fuel and conservation cost recovery (1)
Under-recovered GRIP revenue (2)
Deferred postretirement benefits (3)
Deferred conversion and development costs (1)
Environmental regulatory assets and expenditures (4)
Acquisition adjustment (5)
Loss on reacquired debt (6)
Other

Total Regulatory Assets

Regulatory Liabilities
Self-insurance (7)
Over-recovered purchased fuel and conservation cost recovery (1)
Over-recovered GRIP revenue (2)
Storm reserve (7)
Accrued asset removal cost (8)
Deferred income taxes due to rate change (9)
Other

As of December 31,

2018

2017

$

4,631

$

$

$

165

15,517

16,727

2,731

33,255

942

3,250

77,218

$

947

$

5,443

1,563

677

42,401

91,162

729

9,869

164

15,498

11,735

3,222

39,992

1,031

4,994

86,505

1,013

2,048

2,245

669

40,948

98,492

2,048

147,463

Total Regulatory Liabilities

$

142,922

$

(1) We are allowed to recover the asset or are required to pay the liability in rates. We do not earn an overall rate of return on these assets.
(2) The Florida PSC allowed us to recover through a surcharge, capital and other program-related-costs, inclusive of an appropriate return on investment, associated 
with accelerating the replacement of qualifying distribution mains and services (defined as any material other than coated steel or plastic) in FPU’s natural gas 
distribution, Fort Meade division and Chesapeake Utilities’ Central Florida Gas division.  We are allowed to recover the asset or are required to pay the liability 
in rates related to GRIP. 
(3) The Florida PSC allowed FPU to treat as a regulatory asset the portion of the unrecognized costs pursuant to ASC Topic 715, Compensation - Retirement 
Benefits, related to its regulated operations. See Note 17, Employee Benefit Plans, for additional information.
(4) All of our environmental expenditures incurred to date and our current estimate of future environmental expenditures have been approved by various PSCs for 
recovery. See Note 20, Environmental Commitments and Contingencies, for additional information on our environmental contingencies.
(5) We are allowed to include the premiums paid in various natural gas utility acquisitions in Florida in our rate bases and recover them over a specific time period 
pursuant to the Florida PSC approvals. Included in these amounts are $543,000 of the premium paid by FPU, $34.2 million of the premium paid by us in 2009, 
including a gross up for income tax, because it is not tax deductible, and $746,000 of the premium paid by FPU in 2010. 
(6) Gains and losses resulting from the reacquisition of long-term debt are amortized over future periods as adjustments to interest expense in accordance with 
established regulatory practice.
(7) We have self-insurance and storm reserves in our Florida regulated energy operations that allow us to collect through rates amounts to be used against general 
claims, storm restoration costs and other losses as they are incurred.
(8) See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for additional information on our asset removal cost policies.
(9) We recorded a regulatory liability for our regulated businesses related to the revaluation of accumulated deferred tax assets/liabilities as a result of the TCJA. 
Based upon the regulatory proceedings, we will pass back the respective portion of the excess accumulated deferred taxes to rate payers. See Note 12, Income 
Taxes, for additional information.

20. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing environmental quality and pollution control. These laws 
and regulations require us to remove or remediate, at current and former operating sites, the effect on the environment of the 
disposal or release of specified substances.

MGP Sites

We have participated in the investigation, assessment or remediation of, and have exposures at, seven former MGP sites. We have 
received approval for recovery of clean-up costs in rates for six sites located in Salisbury, Maryland, Seaford, Delaware and Winter 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 93

 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Haven, Key West, Pensacola, Sanford and West Palm Beach, Florida. We have also been in discussions with the MDE regarding 
a former MGP site located in Cambridge, Maryland.

As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately $9.1 million in environmental liabilities, related to FPU’s MGP sites in Key 
West, Pensacola, Sanford and West Palm Beach. FPU has approval to recover, from insurance and from customers through rates, 
up to $14.0 million of its environmental costs related to its MGP sites.  As of December 31, 2018, we have recovered approximately 
$11.5 million, leaving approximately $2.5 million in regulatory assets for future recovery from FPU’s customers.

Environmental liabilities for our MGP sites are recorded on an undiscounted basis based on the estimate of future costs provided 
by  independent  consultants. We  continue  to  expect  that  all  costs  related  to  environmental  remediation  and  related  activities, 
including any potential future remediation costs for which we do not currently have approval for regulatory recovery, will be 
recoverable from customers through rates.

The following is a summary of our remediation status and estimated costs to implement clean-up of our key MGP sites:

MGP Site
(Jurisdiction)
West Palm Beach
(Florida)

Sanford (Florida)

Winter Haven
(Florida)

Seaford
(Delaware)

Cambridge
(Maryland)

Status
Remedial actions approved by Florida Department
of Environmental Protection have been
implemented on the east parcel of the site. Similar
remedial actions expected to be implemented on
other remaining portions.

In March 2018, the EPA approved a "site-wide
ready for anticipated use" status, which is the final
step before delisting a site. Construction has been
completed and restrictive covenants are in place to
ensure protection of human health. The only
remaining activity is long-term groundwater
monitoring. It is unlikely that FPU will incur any
significant future costs associated with the site.

Remediation is ongoing.

Proposed plan for implementation approved by
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Control in July 2017.  Site
assessment is ongoing.

Estimated Cost to Clean Up
(Expect to Recover through Rates)

Between $4.5 million to $15.4 million, including
costs associated with the relocation of FPU’s
operations at this site, which is necessary to
implement the remedial plan, and any potential
costs associated with future redevelopment of the
properties.

FPU's remaining remediation expenses, including
attorneys' fees and costs, are anticipated to be less
than $10,000.

Not expected to exceed $425,000, which includes
costs of implementing institutional controls at the
site.

$273,000 to $465,000.

Currently in discussions with MDE.

Unable to estimate.

21. OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Natural Gas, Electric and Propane Supply 

Our Delmarva Peninsula natural gas distribution operations have asset management agreements with PESCO to manage their 
natural gas transportation and storage capacity. The agreements were effective as of April 1, 2017, and each has a three-year term, 
expiring on March 31, 2020. Previously, the Delaware PSC approved PESCO to serve as an asset manager with respect to our 
Delaware Division.

In May 2013, Sandpiper entered into a capacity, supply and operating agreement with Eastern Gas & Water Investment Company, 
LLC ("EGWIC") to purchase propane through May 2019. Sandpiper's remaining commitment is approximately 1.2 million gallons.  
Sandpiper has the option to enter into either a fixed per-gallon price for some or all of the propane purchases or a market-based 
price utilizing one of two local propane pricing indices.

Also in May 2013, Sharp entered into a separate supply and operating agreement with EGWIC. Under this agreement, Sharp has 
a commitment to supply propane to EGWIC through May 2019. Sharp's current annual commitment is estimated at approximately 
1.2 million gallons. The agreement between Sharp and EGWIC is separate from the agreement between Sandpiper and EGWIC; 
neither agreement permits the set off of the rights and obligations in one agreement against those in the other agreement.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 94

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Chesapeake Utilities' Florida Division has firm transportation service contracts with FGT and Gulfstream. Pursuant to a capacity 
release program approved by the Florida PSC, all of the capacity under these agreements has been released to various third parties, 
including PESCO. Under the terms of these capacity release agreements, Chesapeake Utilities is contingently liable to FGT and 
Gulfstream should any party that acquired the capacity through release fail to pay the capacity charge. 

FPU’s electric supply contracts require FPU to maintain an acceptable standard of creditworthiness based on specific financial 
ratios. FPU’s agreement with FPL requires FPU to meet or exceed a debt service coverage ratio of 1.25 times based on the results 
of the prior 12 months.  If FPU fails to meet this ratio, it must provide an irrevocable letter of credit or pay all amounts outstanding 
under the agreement within five business days. FPU’s electric supply agreement with Gulf Power requires FPU to meet the following 
ratios based on the average of the prior six quarters: (a) funds from operations interest coverage ratio (minimum of 2 times), and 
(b) total debt to total capital (maximum of 65 percent). If FPU fails to meet the requirements, it has to provide the supplier a written 
explanation of actions taken, or proposed to be taken, to become compliant. Failure to comply with the ratios specified in the Gulf 
Power agreement could also result in FPU having to provide an irrevocable letter of credit. As of December 31, 2018, FPU was 
in compliance with all of the requirements of its fuel supply contracts.

Eight Flags provides electricity and steam generation services through its CHP plant located on Amelia Island, Florida. In June 
2016, Eight Flags began selling power generated from the CHP plant to FPU pursuant to a 20-year power purchase agreement for 
distribution to our electric customers. In July 2016, Eight Flags also started selling steam, pursuant to a separate 20-year contract, 
to the landowner on which the CHP plant is located. The CHP plant is powered by natural gas transported by FPU through its 
distribution system and Peninsula Pipeline through its intrastate pipeline.

The total purchase obligations for natural gas, electric and propane supplies are as follows: 

Year
(in thousands)

2019

2020-2021

2022-2023

Beyond 2023

Total

Purchase Obligations

$

158,544

$

74,970

$

42,279

$

129,019

$

404,812

Corporate Guarantees

The Board of Directors has authorized the Company to issue corporate guarantees securing obligations of our subsidiaries and to 
obtain letters of credit securing our subsidiaries' obligations. The maximum authorized liability under such guarantees and letters 
of credit during 2018 was $95.0 million.

We have issued corporate guarantees to certain vendors of our subsidiaries, primarily PESCO. These corporate guarantees provide 
for the payment of natural gas purchases in the event that PESCO defaults. PESCO has never defaulted on its obligations to pay 
its suppliers. The liabilities for these purchases are recorded when incurred. The aggregate amount guaranteed at December 31, 
2018 was $76.5 million, with the guarantees expiring on various dates through December 2019. 

Chesapeake Utilities also guarantees the payment of FPU’s first mortgage bonds. The maximum exposure under this guarantee is 
the  outstanding  principal  plus  accrued  interest  balances.  The  outstanding  principal  balances  of  FPU’s  first  mortgage  bonds 
approximate their carrying values (see Note 13, Long-Term Debt, for further details).

As of December 31, 2018, we have issued letters of credit totaling approximately $7.0 million related to the electric transmission 
services for FPU's electric division, the firm transportation service agreement between TETLP and our Delaware and Maryland 
divisions, the payment of natural gas purchases for PESCO, and to our current and previous primary insurance carriers. These 
letters of credit have various expiration dates through December 2019. There have been no draws on these letters of credit as of 
December 31, 2018. We do not anticipate that the letters of credit will be drawn upon by the counterparties, and we expect that 
the letters of credit will be renewed to the extent necessary in the future. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 95

22. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

In our opinion, the quarterly financial information shown below includes all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the 
operations for such periods. Due to the seasonal nature of our business, there are substantial variations in operations reported on 
a quarterly basis.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands except per share amounts)
2018 (1)
Operating Revenues
Operating Income
Net Income
Earnings per share:

Basic
Diluted

2017 (1)
Operating Revenues
Operating Income
Net Income
Earnings per share:

Basic
Diluted

For the Quarters Ended

March 31

June 30

September 30

December 31

$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$

$
$

239,356
40,406
26,855

1.64
1.64

185,160
35,099
19,144

1.17
1.17

$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$

$
$

136,664
13,248
6,387

0.39
0.39

125,084
14,061
6,046

0.37
0.37

$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$

$
$

140,279
12,036
5,538

0.34
0.34

126,936
14,632
6,833

0.42
0.42

$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$

$
$

201,190
28,930
17,801

1.09
1.08

180,403
23,628
26,101

1.60
1.59

(1) The sum of the four quarters does not equal the total for the year due to rounding.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 96

 
 
 
 
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the participation of other Company officials, have evaluated our 
“disclosure controls and procedures” (as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and  Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31, 2018. Based upon their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer 
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2018.

CHANGE IN INTERNAL CONTROLS

There has been no change in internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) 
that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2018, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, 
internal control over financial reporting.

CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATIONS

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have filed with the SEC the certifications required by Section 302 of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 
2018. In addition, on June 8, 2018, our former Chief Executive Officer certified to the NYSE that he was not aware of any violation 
by us of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is 
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to 
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external 
purposes in accordance with GAAP. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures 
that:  (i) pertain  to  the  maintenance  of  records  which  in  reasonable  detail,  accurately  and  fairly  reflect  the  transactions  and 
dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit 
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made 
only  in  accordance  with  authorizations  of  management  and  directors  of  the  company;  and  (iii) provide  reasonable  assurance 
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have 
a material effect on the financial statements.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, 
our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria 
established in an updated report entitled “Internal Control - Integrated Framework,” issued in May 2013 by the Committee of 
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting 
may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the 
risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or 
procedures may deteriorate.

Our management has evaluated and concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 
2018.

Our independent auditors, Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, have audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial 
reporting  as  of  December 31,  2018,  as  stated  in  their  report  which  appears  under  Part  II,  Item 8.  Financial  Statements  and 
Supplementary Data. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 97

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

In December 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had appointed Jeffry M. Householder, formerly President 
of the Company's Florida business unit, President and Chief Executive Officer.  Concurrent with his promotion, Mr. Householder 
was also appointed to the Company's Board of Directors.  Both appointments were effective on January 1, 2019.

The Company's former President and Chief Executive Officer, Michael P. McMasters, who retired on December 31, 2018, is 
continuing as a member of the Company's Board of Directors.

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, president, principal financial officer, principal 
accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions, which is a “code of ethics” as defined by applicable 
rules  of  the  SEC.  This  Code  of  Ethics  is  publicly  available  on  our  website  at  http://www.chpk.com/wp-content/uploads/
Code_of_Ethics.pdf.  If  we  make  any  amendments  to  this  code  other  than  technical,  administrative  or  other  non-substantive 
amendments, or grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of this code to our principal executive officer, 
president, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, we intend to disclose the nature of the amendment 
or waiver, its effective date and to whom it applies by posting such information on our website at the address and location specified 
above.

The remaining information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of our Proxy Statement 
captioned “Election of Directors (Proposal 1),” “Overview,” “Corporate Governance,” “Board of Directors and its Committees” 
and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of our Proxy Statement captioned “Director 
Compensation,” “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER 
MATTERS.

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of our Proxy Statement captioned “Security 
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and "Equity Compensation Plan Information."

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section of our Proxy Statement captioned “Corporate 
Governance.”

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the portion of the Proxy Statement captioned “Fees 
and Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm."

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 98

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. 

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(a)(1) All of the financial statements, reports and notes to the financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this 
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(a)(2) Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

(a)(3) The Exhibits below. 

•     Exhibit 3.1

•     Exhibit 3.2

•     Exhibit 3.3

•     Exhibit 3.4

•     Exhibit 3.5

•     Exhibit 3.6

•     Exhibit 4.1

•     Exhibit 4.2

•     Exhibit 4.3

•     Exhibit 4.4

•      Exhibit 4.5

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation is 
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for 
the period ended June 30, 2010, File No. 001-11590.

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, effective December 4, 
2012, are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, 
filed December 7, 2012, File No. 001-11590.  

First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, 
effective December 3, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of our Annual 
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Second  Amendment  to  the  Amended  and  Restated  Bylaws  of  Chesapeake  Utilities 
Corporation, effective November 2, 2016, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 
of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, File No. 
001-11590.

Certificate  of Amendment  to  the Amended  and  Restated  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our 
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 9, 2017, File No. 001-11590. 

Certificate  of  Elimination  of  Series  A  Participating  Cumulative  Preferred  Stock  of 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to our 
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, File No. 001-11590.

Note Agreement  dated  October  18,  2005,  between  Chesapeake  Utilities  Corporation,  as 
issuer, and Prudential Investment Management, Inc., relating to the private placement of 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation’s 5.5% Senior Notes due 2020, is incorporated herein by 
reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 
31, 2005, File No. 001-11590.

Note Agreement dated October 31, 2008, among Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, as issuer, 
General American Life  Insurance  Company  and  New  England  Life  Insurance  Company, 
relating to the private placement of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation's  5.93% Senior Notes 
due 2023.†

   Note Agreement dated June 29, 2010, among Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, as issuer, 
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and New England Life Insurance Company,  relating 
to the private placement of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation’s 5.68% Senior Notes due 2026 
and Chesapeake Utilities Corporation’s 6.43% Senior Notes due 2028.†

Note Agreement dated September 5, 2013, among Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, as issuer, 
and  certain  note  holders,  relating  to  the  private  placement  of  Chesapeake  Utilities 
Corporation’s 3.73% Senior Notes due 2028 and Chesapeake Utilities Corporation’s 3.88% 
Senior Notes due 2029.†

Form of Indenture of Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated September 1, 1942, between Florida 
Public Utilities Company and the trustee, for the First Mortgage Bonds, is incorporated herein 
by reference to Exhibit 7-A of Florida Public Utilities Company’s Registration No. 2-6087.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 99

  
  
  
  
  
•      Exhibit 4.6

•       Exhibit 4.7

•       Exhibit 4.8

•       Exhibit 4.9

•       Exhibit 4.10

•       Exhibit 4.11

•        Exhibit 10.1*

•        Exhibit 10.2*

•        Exhibit 10.3*

•        Exhibit 10.4*

•        Exhibit 10.5*

•        Exhibit 10.6*

•        Exhibit 10.7*

•        Exhibit 10.8*

Seventeenth  Supplemental  Indenture  dated April 12,  2011, between  Chesapeake  Utilities 
Corporation and Florida Public Utilities Company, pursuant to which Chesapeake Utilities 
Corporation guarantees the payment and performance obligations of Florida Public Utilities 
Company  under  the  Indenture,  is  incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  Exhibit  4.1  of  our 
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, File No. 001-11590.

Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture dated December 1, 2009, between Chesapeake Utilities 
Corporation and Florida Public Utilities Company, pursuant to which Chesapeake Utilities 
Corporation  guaranteed  the  secured  First  Mortgage  Bonds  of  Florida  Public  Utilities 
Company under the Merger Agreement, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.9 of 
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, File No. 001-11590.

Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture dated June 1, 1992, pursuant to which Florida Public 
Utilities, on May 1, 1992, privately placed $8,000,000 of its 9.08% First Mortgage Bonds 
due  2022,  is  incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  Exhibit  4  to  Florida  Public  Utilities 
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1992.

Private Shelf Agreement dated October 8, 2015, between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, 
as issuer, and Prudential Investment Management Inc., relating to the private placement of 
Chesapeake  Utilities  Corporation's  3.25%  Senior  Notes  due  2032  and  the  sale  of  other 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation unsecured Senior Notes from time to time, is incorporated 
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended 
September 30, 2015, File No. 001-11590.

First Amendment to Private Shelf Agreement dated September 14, 2018, between Chesapeake 
Utilities Corporation, as issuer, and PGIM, Inc. (formerly known as Prudential Investment 
Management, Inc.), and other purchasers that may become party thereto. †

Master Note Agreement dated March 2, 2017, among Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, as 
issuer, NYL Investors LLC, and other certain note holders that may become party thereto 
from time to time relating to the private placement of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation’s 
3.48% Senior Notes due 2038 and Chesapeake Utilities Corporation’s 3.58% Senior Notes 
due 2038. †

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation Cash Bonus Incentive Plan, effective January 1, 2015, is 
incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement dated March 31, 2015, in connection 
with our Annual Meeting held on May 6, 2015, File No. 001-11590.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2013 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan, effective 
May 2, 2013 is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement dated March 29, 
2013 in connection with our Annual Meeting held on May 2, 2013, File No. 001-11590.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2014, is incorporated herein 
by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 
31, 2013, File No. 001-11590.

Executive Employment Agreement dated January 14, 2011, between Chesapeake Utilities 
Corporation and Michael P. McMasters, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 
of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 21, 2011, File No. 001-11590.

Amendment  to  Executive  Employment  Agreement  effective  January  1,  2014,  between 
Chesapeake  Utilities  Corporation  and  Michael  P.  McMasters,  is  incorporated  herein  by 
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 14, 2014, File 
No. 001-11590.

Executive  Employment Agreement dated  January  9,  2013,  between  Chesapeake  Utilities 
Corporation and Stephen C. Thompson, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 
of  our  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2012,  File  No. 
001-11590.

Executive  Employment Agreement dated  January  9,  2013,  between  Chesapeake  Utilities 
Corporation and Beth W. Cooper, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of our 
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, File No. 001-11590.

Executive  Employment Agreement  dated  January  9,  2013,  between  Chesapeake  Utilities 
Corporation and Elaine B. Bittner, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of our 
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, File No. 001-11590.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 100

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
•       Exhibit 10.9*

•     Exhibit 10.10*

•     Exhibit 10.11*

•     Exhibit 10.12*

•     Exhibit 10.13*

•     Exhibit 10.14*

•     Exhibit 10.15*

•     Exhibit 10.16

•     Exhibit 10.17

•       Exhibit 10.18*

•       Exhibit 10.19*

Executive  Employment Agreement dated  January  1,  2015,  between  Chesapeake  Utilities 
Corporation and Jeffry M. Householder, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 
of  our  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2014,  File  No. 
001-11590.

Form of Performance Share Agreement, effective January 7, 2014 for the period 2014 to 
2016, pursuant to Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2013 Stock and Incentive Compensation 
Plan by and between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and each of Michael P. McMasters, 
Beth W. Cooper, Stephen C. Thompson, Elaine B. Bittner, and Jeffry M. Householder is 
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 
the year ended December 31, 2013, File No. 001-11590.

Form of Performance Share Agreement, effective January 13, 2015 for the period 2015 to 
2017, pursuant to Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2013 Stock and Incentive Compensation 
Plan by and between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and each of Michael P. McMasters, 
Beth W. Cooper, Stephen C. Thompson, Elaine B. Bittner and Jeffry M. Householder, is 
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 
the year ended December 31, 2014, File No. 001-11590.

Form of Performance Share Agreement, dated March 6, 2015 for the period 2015 to 2017, 
pursuant to Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2013 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan 
by  and  between  Chesapeake  Utilities  Corporation  and  James  F. Moriarty  is  incorporated 
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended 
September 30, 2015, File No. 001-11590.

Form of Performance Share Agreement, dated January 12, 2016 for the period 2016 to 2018, 
pursuant to Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2013 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan 
by and between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and each of Michael P. McMasters, Beth 
W. Cooper, Stephen C. Thompson, Elaine B. Bittner, Jeffry M. Householder and James F. 
Moriarty, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to our Annual Report on Form 
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, File No. 001-11590.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and 
restated effective January 1, 2009, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of 
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 001-11590.

First  Amendment  to  the  Chesapeake  Utilities  Corporation  Supplemental  Executive 
Retirement Plan as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, is incorporated herein 
by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 
31, 2010, File No. 001-11590.

Revolving  Credit  Agreement  dated  October  8,  2015,  between  Chesapeake  Utilities 
Corporation and PNC Bank, National Association, Bank of America, N.A., Citizens Bank 
N.A.,  Royal  Bank  of  Canada  and  Wells Fargo  Bank,  National Association as  lenders,  is 
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for 
the period ended September 30, 2015, File No. 001-11590. 

First Amendment dated February 25, 2016 to the Revolving Credit Agreement dated October 
8, 2015, between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and PNC Bank, National Association, 
Bank of America, N.A., Citizens Bank N.A., Royal Bank of Canada and Wells Fargo Bank, 
National Association as lenders, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of our 
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, File No. 001-11590.

Executive  Employment  Agreement  dated  May  10,  2016,  between  Chesapeake  Utilities 
Corporation and James F. Moriarty, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of 
our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended June 30, 2016, File No. 001-11590.

Form of Performance Share Agreement, effective February 23, 2017 for the period 2017 to 
2019, pursuant to Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2013 Stock and Incentive Compensation 
Plan by and between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and each of Michael P. McMasters, 
Beth W. Cooper, Stephen C. Thompson, Elaine B. Bittner, Jeffry M. Householder, and James 
F. Moriarty, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on 
Form 10-Q for the year ended June 30, 2017, File No. 001-11590.

•       Exhibit 10.20

Credit  Agreement,  dated  November  28,  2017,  by  and  between  Chesapeake  Utilities 
Corporation and Branch Banking and Trust Company is filed herewith.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 101

  
  
  
  
  
  
•       Exhibit 10.21*

•       Exhibit 10.22*

Separation Agreement and Release, effective as of June 7, 2018, by and between Chesapeake 
Utilities Corporation and Elaine B. Bittner, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 
10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 8, 2018, File No. 001-11590.

Form of Performance Share Agreement, effective February 26, 2018 for the period 2018 to 
2020, pursuant to Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2013 Stock and Incentive Compensation 
Plan by and between Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and each of Michael P. McMasters, 
Beth W. Cooper, Stephen C. Thompson, Jeffry M. Householder and James F. Moriarty, is 
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for 
the quarter ended March 31, 2018, File No. 001-11590.

•       Exhibit 10.23

Term Note dated December 21, 2018 issued by Chesapeake Utilities Corporation in favor of 
PNC Bank, National Association is filed herewith.

•       Exhibit 10.24*

•       Exhibit 10.25*

•       Exhibit 10.26

•       Exhibit 21

Form of Performance Share Agreement, effective February 25, 2019 for the period January 
01, 2019 to December 31, 2021, pursuant to Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2013 Stock 
and  Incentive  Compensation  Plan  by  and  between  Chesapeake  Utilities  Corporation  and 
Jeffry M. Householder is filed herewith.

Executive Employment Agreement dated February 25, 2019, between Chesapeake Utilities 
Corporation and Jeffry M. Householder, is filed herewith.

Term Note dated January 31, 2019 issued by Chesapeake Utilities Corporation in favor of 
Branch Banking & Trust Company is filed herewith.
Subsidiaries of the Registrant is filed herewith.

•       Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm is filed herewith.

•       Exhibit 31.1

•       Exhibit 31.2

•       Exhibit 32.1

•       Exhibit 32.2

Certificate  of  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Chesapeake  Utilities  Corporation  pursuant  to 
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d – 14(a), is filed herewith.

Certificate  of  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Chesapeake  Utilities  Corporation  pursuant  to 
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d – 14(a), is filed herewith.

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation pursuant to 18 
U.S.C. Section 1350, is filed herewith.

Certificate of Chief Financial Officer of Chesapeake Utilities Corporation pursuant to 18 
U.S.C. Section 1350, is filed herewith.

•       Exhibit 101.INS XBRL Instance Document is filed herewith.

•       Exhibit 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document is filed herewith.

•       Exhibit 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document is filed herewith.

•       Exhibit 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document is filed herewith.

•       Exhibit 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document is filed herewith.

•       Exhibit 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document is filed herewith.

*

†

Management contract or compensatory plan or agreement.

These agreements have not been filed herewith pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(v) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act 
of 1933, as amended. We hereby agree to furnish copies to the SEC upon request.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 102

  
  
  
  
  
  
 
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY. 

None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION

By:

/s/ JEFFRY M. HOUSEHOLDER
Jeffry M. Householder
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
February 26, 2019

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following 
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ JEFFRY M. HOUSEHOLDER
Jeffry M. Householder
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
February 26, 2019

/S/ BETH W. COOPER
Beth W. Cooper, Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
and Assistant Corporate Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
February 26, 2019

/S/ JOHN R. SCHIMKAITIS
John R. Schimkaitis
Chair of the Board and Director
February 26, 2019

/S/ EUGENE H. BAYARD, ESQ
Eugene H. Bayard, Esq., Director
February 26, 2019

/S/ THOMAS J. BRESNAN
Thomas J. Bresnan, Director
February 26, 2019

/S/ RONALD G. FORSYTHE, JR.
Dr. Ronald G. Forsythe, Jr., Director
February 26, 2019

/S/ THOMAS P. HILL, JR.
Thomas P. Hill, Jr., Director
February 26, 2019

/S/ DENNIS S. HUDSON, III
Dennis S. Hudson, III, Director
February 26, 2019

/S/ PAUL L. MADDOCK, JR.
Paul L. Maddock, Jr., Director
February 26, 2019

/s/ MICHAEL P. MCMASTERS
Michael P. McMasters, Director
February 26, 2019

/S/ CALVERT A. MORGAN, JR.
Calvert A. Morgan, Jr., Director
February 26, 2019

/S/ DIANNA F. MORGAN
Dianna F. Morgan, Director
February 26, 2019

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K   Page 103

 
 
 
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation and Subsidiaries
Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Additions

For the Year Ended December 31,

(In thousands)
Reserve Deducted From Related Assets
Reserve for Uncollectible Accounts

Balance at
Beginning of
Year

Charged to
Income

Other
Accounts 

(1)

Deductions  

(2)

Balance at End
of Year

2018
2017
2016

$

$

936
909
909

$

1,157
602
985

$

136
337
340

(1,121) $
(912)
(1,325)

1,108
936
909

(1) Recoveries.
(2) Uncollectible accounts charged off. 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 2018 Form 10-K     Page 104

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CORPORATE INFORMATION 

CORPORATE OFFICE 

909 Silver Lake Boulevard
Dover, DE 19904
Telephone: 302.734.6799
Website:  www.chpk.com 

ANNUAL MEETING 

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on 
Wednesday, May 8, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. in the du Barry 
Room, Hotel du Pont; 42 W. 11th Street; 
Wilmington, DE. 

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 

Computershare Trust Company, N.A. 
c/o Chesapeake Utilities Corporation 
P.O. Box 505000 
Louisville, KY  40233-5000 
Telephone (toll-free) 877.498.8865 
Website:  www.computershare.com/investor 

DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT 
AND DIRECT STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 

The Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase 
Plan provides flexible investment options for those 
who wish to invest in the Company.  Common stock 
holders can have their dividends automatically 
reinvested to purchase additional shares directly 
through the Plan and/or send in additional optional 
cash investments at any time to increase their 
holdings.  New investors can purchase shares directly 
through the Plan.  For more information, please 
contact the Company’s transfer agent 
(Computershare) as stated above.  

ANALYST INFORMATION

Beth W. Cooper 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 
Telephone:  302.734.6799 
bcooper@chpk.com 

Thomas E. Mahn 
Vice President and Treasurer 
Telephone:  302.734.6799 
tmahn@chpk.com 

COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION 

NYSE:  CPK 

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation’s common stock is 
traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the 
symbol CPK. 

QUARTER 
ENDED 2018
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31

PRICE RANGE
LOW
$63.35
$69.15
$79.10
$77.20

HIGH
$78.95
$80.90
$90.90
$93.40

CLOSE
$70.35
$79.95
$83.90
$81.30

QUARTER 
ENDED 2017
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31

PRICE RANGE
LOW
$63.00
$68.65
$74.80
$75.00

HIGH
$70.70
$77.75
$81.95
$86.35

CLOSE
$69.20
$74.95
$78.25
$78.55

DIVIDENDS
DECLARED
PER SHARE*
$0.3250
$0.3700
$0.3700
$0.3700

DIVIDENDS
DECLARED
PER SHARE*
$0.3050
$0.3250
$0.3250
$0.3250

*Declaration of dividends is at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Dividends in 2018 and 2017 were paid quarterly.

PUBLIC INFORMATION AND SEC FILINGS

Our latest news and filings with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission (SEC), including Forms 10-K, 
10-Q and 8-K are available to view or request a 
printed copy, free of charge, at our website, 
www.chpk.com.

If you wish to request a printed copy of any of the 
Company’s publications by mail, please send your 
written request to Investor Relations below. 

INVESTOR RELATIONS/SHAREHOLDER SERVICES 

Heidi W. Watkins 
Shareholder Services Manager 
Telephone (toll free):  888.742.5275 
hwatkins@chpk.com 

CHPK.COM

909 Silver Lake Boulevard  |  Dover, Delaware 19904 USA

002CSN9E17