Quarterlytics / Real Estate / REIT - Office / CLS Holdings

CLS Holdings

cli · LSE Real Estate
Claim this profile
Ticker cli
Exchange LSE
Sector Real Estate
Industry REIT - Office
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2023 Annual Report · CLS Holdings
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
The return 
to the office

CLS Holdings plc
Annual Report and Accounts 2023

Inside this report

Investment case

Key investment tenets
Experienced in-house capabilities
In-house asset, property and facilities management 
teams result in better cost control, closer asset knowledge 
and synergies across the property portfolio.

Key investment tenets
Diversified approach
This approach is across countries (we invest in major cities 
in Europe’s three largest economies), tenants (over 700 tenants 
spread across most sectors), and financing (loans with 
24 different lenders).

1 A clear strategy
2 Active management
3 Strong 30 year track record
4 A focus on sustainability

Key investment tenets
Disciplined approach to investment
Acquisitions are assessed against strict return and strategic 
fit criteria but are pursued on an opportunistic and property 
by property basis with no set capital allocation across countries. 
Low yielding assets with limited potential are sold. Our TSR 
has outperformed the FTSE 350 index over a 30 year period. 

Key investment tenets
Responsible profit
Across our business model, in everything we do, we seek 
to generate responsible profit through employing sustainable 
long-term decisions with the environment in mind. 

Sole focus on multi-let offices

Long-term investment in high 

Selected development schemes

Opportunities arise in the portfolio 

DELIVERED OUTCOMES  

EPRA NTA pence per share

yielding, multi-let offices in London 

to carry out development projects 

and the South East of the UK, and the 

to capture rental and capital growth; 

larger cities in Germany and France.

the amount of development is kept 

253.0

329.6

350.5

345.2

326.3

below 10% of the portfolio value at 

any one time. Opportunities to secure 

alternative uses are pursued usually 

until planning permission is secured 

and then the property is sold to 

a developer.

Secure rents and high occupancy

Interest rate management

Targeted occupancy levels above 

Financing facilities, which are 

DELIVERED OUTCOMES  

NIY vs cost of debt 

95% with affordable rents and 

arranged in-house, seek to balance 

flexible lease terms to meet tenant 

flexibility, diversity and maturity of 

demand and so create opportunities 

funding whilst ensuring a low cost 

to capture above market rental 

growth. On average over 135 

lettings executed each year 

over the past six years.

of debt which is targeted to be at 

least 200 basis points below the 

Group’s net initial yield.

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

 Net initial yield

Weighted average cost of debt

DELIVERED OUTCOMES  

Distribution of this year’s profit (pence per share)

Cash-backed progressive dividend

Financing headroom

CLS is a total return business 

Our aim is to keep at least 

using cash flow generated to pay 

£100 million of cash and undrawn 

a progressive dividend and also to 

facilities. This approach gives the 

reinvest in the business to generate 

ability to move quickly to complete 

further net asset growth. We aim 

acquisition opportunities as well 

to grow the dividend in line with the 

as the flexibility to secure the 

growth of the business, targeting 

optimal financing solution.

the dividend to be covered 1.2 to 

1.6 times by EPRA earnings.

Strong ESG performance

Climate risk mitigation

We believe in full transparency 

Our in-house sustainability programme 

and therefore continually measure 

is focused on mitigating our impact 

our progress against global ESG 

on environmental climate risks and 

benchmark schemes in our industry, 

energy security whilst maximising 

such as GRESB. This also allows us 

the benefits we deliver to the 

to monitor our progress and gives 

communities in which we are involved.

our stakeholders confidence in 

our delivery against commitments.

DELIVERED OUTCOMES  

GRESB (ESG) score/100

5.4%

3.6%

7.95

7.95

7.70

7.55

7.40

84

85

85

72

70

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

6%

5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

Strategic report
Group highlights
02 
Chairman’s statement
06 
Chief Executive’s review
07 
Country reviews
10 
Strategy and business model
16     
Strategy in action
18 
Key performance indicators
22 
CFO review
24 
Engaging our stakeholders
28 
 ESG overview
32 
Risk management
48 
Going concern and viability
54 

Corporate governance
58 
59 
60 
62 

Chairman’s introduction
UK Corporate Governance Code
Board of Directors
 Board leadership and 
Company purpose
Workforce engagement
Culture dashboard
Division of responsibilities
Nomination Committee Report
Audit Committee Report
Remuneration Committee Report
Directors’ Report
Directors’ responsibility statement

65 
66 
67 
68 
76 
81 
100   
103   

Financial statements
104  

114   
115   

116   
117   
118   
119   
153   
154  

155   

 Independent Auditor’s report to 
the members of CLS Holdings plc
Group income statement
 Group statement of 
comprehensive income
Group balance sheet
 Group statement of changes in equity
Group statement of cash flows
 Notes to the Group financial statements
Company balance sheet
 Company statement  
of changes in equity
 Notes to the Company 
financial statements

Additional information
Five-year financial summary
160   
Alternative performance measures
161    
Glossary
166  
Directors, officers and advisors
168  

Read our sustainability report

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 A clear strategy

Key investment tenets

Diversified approach

24 different lenders).

This approach is across countries (we invest in major cities 

in Europe’s three largest economies), tenants (over 700 tenants 

spread across most sectors), and financing (loans with 

2 Active management

and synergies across the property portfolio.

Experienced in-house capabilities

Key investment tenets

In-house asset, property and facilities management 

teams result in better cost control, closer asset knowledge 

3 Strong 30 year track record

Acquisitions are assessed against strict return and strategic 

fit criteria but are pursued on an opportunistic and property 

by property basis with no set capital allocation across countries. 

Disciplined approach to investment

Key investment tenets

Low yielding assets with limited potential are sold. Our TSR 

has outperformed the FTSE 350 index over a 30 year period. 

4 A focus on sustainability

long-term decisions with the environment in mind. 

Across our business model, in everything we do, we seek 

Key investment tenets

to generate responsible profit through employing sustainable 

Responsible profit

Sole focus on multi-let offices
Long-term investment in high 
yielding, multi-let offices in London 
and the South East of the UK, and the 
larger cities in Germany and France.

Selected development schemes
Opportunities arise in the portfolio 
to carry out development projects 
to capture rental and capital growth; 
the amount of development is kept 
below 10% of the portfolio value at 
any one time. Opportunities to secure 
alternative uses are pursued usually 
until planning permission is secured 
and then the property is sold to 
a developer.

DELIVERED OUTCOMES  
EPRA NTA pence per share

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

253.0

329.6

350.5

345.2

326.3

Secure rents and high occupancy
Targeted occupancy levels above 
95% with affordable rents and 
flexible lease terms to meet tenant 
demand and so create opportunities 
to capture above market rental 
growth. On average over 135 
lettings executed each year 
over the past six years.

Interest rate management
Financing facilities, which are 
arranged in-house, seek to balance 
flexibility, diversity and maturity of 
funding whilst ensuring a low cost 
of debt which is targeted to be at 
least 200 basis points below the 
Group’s net initial yield.

DELIVERED OUTCOMES  
NIY vs cost of debt 
6%

5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%

5.4%

3.6%

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

 Net initial yield

Weighted average cost of debt

DELIVERED OUTCOMES  
Distribution of this year’s profit (pence per share)

Cash-backed progressive dividend
CLS is a total return business 
using cash flow generated to pay 
a progressive dividend and also to 
reinvest in the business to generate 
further net asset growth. We aim 
to grow the dividend in line with the 
growth of the business, targeting 
the dividend to be covered 1.2 to 
1.6 times by EPRA earnings.

Strong ESG performance
We believe in full transparency 
and therefore continually measure 
our progress against global ESG 
benchmark schemes in our industry, 
such as GRESB. This also allows us 
to monitor our progress and gives 
our stakeholders confidence in 
our delivery against commitments.

Financing headroom
Our aim is to keep at least 
£100 million of cash and undrawn 
facilities. This approach gives the 
ability to move quickly to complete 
acquisition opportunities as well 
as the flexibility to secure the 
optimal financing solution.

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

Climate risk mitigation
Our in-house sustainability programme 
is focused on mitigating our impact 
on environmental climate risks and 
energy security whilst maximising 
the benefits we deliver to the 
communities in which we are involved.

DELIVERED OUTCOMES  
GRESB (ESG) score/100

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

7.95

7.95

7.70

7.55

7.40

84

85

85

72

70

TOTAL RETURNS TO SHAREHOLDERS (SEE PAGE 23 FOR MORE RECENT PERFORMANCE)

  CLS

  FTSE All Share & FTSE 350

  FTSE RE SS

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

CAGR -0.1%

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

1

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
 
 
LIKE-FOR-LIKE DECREASE IN LANDLORD 
ENERGY CONSUMPTION

8%

GRESB RATING (2022: 4 STARS)

4 Stars

INCREASE IN EQUIVALENT 
SOCIAL VALUE GENERATED FROM 2022

37%

NUMBER OF NET ZERO CARBON 
PROJECTS COMPLETED

73

Group highlights

i

s
t
h
g
i
l
h
g
h
c
i
g
e
t
a
r
t
S

s
t
h
g
i
l
h
g
h
G
S
E

i

CONTRACTED RENT WHICH IS   
INDEX-LINKED (2022: 55.5%)

55.2%

EPRA VACANCY RATE  
(2022: 7.4%)

11.0%

NET RENTAL INCOME £113.0M 
(2022: £107.8M)

4.8%

CAPITAL EXPENDITURE  
(2022: £58M)

£50m

FOUR DISPOSALS AND ONE EXCHANGE 
ABOVE PRE-SALE VALUATIONS 
(2022: +2.5%)

+10.0%

SECURED RENT ABOVE ERV FOR 
NEW LEASES

+6.9%

 see pages 7 to 9

2

 see pages 32 to 47

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORT 
 
Group highlights

t
n
e
m
e
v
o
M

i

s
t
h
g
i
l
h
g
h
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
F

i

l
a
u
t
c
A

i

s
t
h
g
i
l
h
g
h
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
F

i

EPRA EPS

-11.2%

2023  

2022 

10.3p

11.6p

STATUTORY EPS

-311.4%

2023 

2022

-62.9p

-20.2p

LOSS BEFORE TA X

-305.0%

2023  

2022 

-249.8m

-82.0m

EPRA NTA PER SHARE

-23.2%

2023  

2022 

253.0p

329.6p

STATUTORY NAV PER SHARE

-23.9%

2023  

2022 

233.8p

307.3p

PROPERT Y PORTFOLIO

-12.3%

1  In local currency 
– total property portfolio

 see pages 24 to 27

2023  

2022 

2.06bn

2.35bn

VALUATION MOVEMENT1

-12.5%

2023 

2022

-12.5%

-5.3%

COST OF DEBT

3.61%

2023  

2022 

3.61%

2.69%

BALANCE SHEET LOAN-TO-VALUE

48.5%

2023  

2022 

48.5%

42.2%

AMOUNT OF GROUP BORROWINGS   
AT FIXED RATES (INCLUDING CAPS) 

80%

2023  

2022 

80%

76%

RENTAL INCOME COLLECTION

99.0%

2023  

2022 

99%

99%

FULL YEAR’S DIVIDEND 

7.95p

2023  

2022 

7.95p

7.95p

3

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
 
 
 
CLS Holdings at a glance
Our portfolio is secure and diversified

About CLS Holdings

What we do

We are a commercial property investment 
company. We specialise in office space and our 
£2.1 billion portfolio comprises 6.4m sq. ft of 
future-focused workspace in the UK, Germany 
and France. Through geographical diversification, 
local expertise and an active management 
approach, we transform office properties into 
suitable, modern spaces that help our tenants’ 
businesses to grow.

Our investments are based on our long-term 
vision, continuously modernising our portfolio into 
viable, future-focused and sustainable properties. 
We apply the same long-term approach to our tenants 
by understanding their own business ambitions. 
By providing the right environment and sharing 
our expert insight, we help them make more 
informed choices and grow their businesses 
in a more responsible, considered way.

 We transform 
office properties 
into suitable, modern 
spaces that help our 
tenants’ businesses 
to grow. 

TENANT DIVERSITY BY CONTRACTED RENT (%)
1

Government

Commercial and Professional Services

Information Technology

Consumer Discretionary

Communication Services

Healthcare

Financials

Industrials

Real Estate

Consumer Staples

Energy

Other

2

3

4

5

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

1

4

CLS HOLDINGS PLC  Annual Report and Accounts 2023

86

PROPERTIES

£126m

ESTIMATED  
RENTAL VALUE

£2.1bn

PROPERT Y PORTFOLIO

2023
21.5%

13.2%

11.5%

10.0%

8.7%

7.0%

6.3%

6.2%

5.5%

4.2%

2.1%

3.8%

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

STRATEGIC REPORTLEASE DATA1

Average lease length

Contracted rent of leases expiring in:

VALUATION DATA1

United Kingdom
Germany
France
Total office portfolio

United Kingdom
Germany
France
Total office portfolio

RENTAL DATA1

United Kingdom
Germany
France
Total office portfolio

Valuation movement 
in the year

Market value  
of property
£m

Underlying
£m

Foreign 
exchange
£m

EPRA net 
initial yield

EPRA 
‘topped-up’ 
net initial 
yield

Reversion Over-rented

Equivalent 
yield

745.4
883.8
246.0
1,875.2

(190.4)
(89.1)
(28.2)
(307.7)

–
(20.4)
(5.7)
(26.1)

To break
years

2.5
4.8
2.7
3.5

To 
expiry
years

3.5
4.9
5.2
4.3

Year 1
£m

4.8
14.5
1.3
20.6

Year 2
£m

3 to 5 years 
£m

12.3
4.9
0.8
18.0

24.7
14.3
4.2
43.2

5.4%
4.7%
4.8%
5.0%

After 5 
years
£m

9.0
13.8
7.9
30.7

6.1%
4.8%
5.2%
5.4%

Year 1
£m

4.6
14.1
1.5
20.1

8.1%
6.0%
8.0%
7.2%

7.0%
8.7%
4.0%
7.4%

ERV of leases expiring in:

Year 2
£m

3 to 5 years 
£m

15.0
4.7
0.8
20.4

23.2
14.0
4.4
41.6

6.1%
5.2%
6.0%
5.7%

After 5 
years
£m

8.7
13.3
8.2
30.2

Rental  
income for  
the year
£m

Net rental 
income for 
the year
£m

46.4
43.2
13.2
102.8

52.4
41.5
13.6
107.5

Lettable 
space
sqm

172,973
345,641
72,495
591,109

Contracted 
rent at 
year end
£m

ERV at 
year end
£m

Contracted 
rent subject 
to indexation
%

EPRA 
vacancy rate 
at year end

50.8
47.5
14.3
112.6

61.0
49.5
15.7
126.3

32.7
65.9
100.0
55.2

15.8%
6.8%
5.6%
11.0%

1   The above tables comprise data for our offices in investment properties and held for sale (see note 12 and 14). They exclude 

owner-occupied, land, student accommodation and hotel.

TOP 15 TENANTS

TENANT DIVERSITY BY CONTRACTED RENT (%)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

 Secretary of State

4

3

1.  GOVERNMENT

2.  LARGE1

3.  MEDIUM1

4.  OTHER

21.5%

40.3%

16.3%

21.9%

1

2

1  Based on definitions by Companies House.

5

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONChairman’s review

Lennart Sten
Non-Executive Chairman

Dear Shareholder,
As a result of recent events and trends, quality 
has become the greatest differentiator for the 
office sector. Well-located space with great 
amenities drive rental growth and ultimately 
value, particularly when supply is low. With 
greater calls for employees to return to the office, 
CLS is ensuring that we supply the best offices in our 
locations to attract tenants and “earn the commute”.

Performance and our property portfolio
CLS again delivered a robust performance. 
Strong rental growth was achieved through 
indexation, record student and hotel results 
and the full-year impact of previous acquisitions, 
although this was offset by higher interest 
expense from rate increases leading to overall 
lower earnings.

The value of our property portfolio fell by 12.3% to 
£2.06 billion (2022: £2.35 billion) with the portfolio 
now split 45% in the UK, 43% in Germany and 12% 
in France. The movement in the property portfolio 
was as a result of £299.5 million from a net 
valuation decrease of 12.5% in local currencies, 
£26.3 million from the strengthening of Sterling by 
2.1%, £14.0 million of disposals, and depreciation 
of £0.2 million, partly offset by £50.1 million of 
capital expenditure.

 Increasing 
interest rates 
meant 2023 was 
a challenging year 
for the office 
sector but CLS 
has remained 
committed to 
its strategy of 
providing high-
quality office space 
to meet our tenants’ 
needs. In 2024, 
the Group will 
celebrate 30 years 
since its listing on 
the London Stock 
Exchange and I am 
confident that CLS 
will continue to 
thrive and deliver 
for shareholders 
for many years 
to come. 

6

The property valuation decreases resulted 
in EPRA NTA per share declining by 23.2% 
to 253.0 pence per share (2022: 329.6 pence 
per share) and the Total Accounting Return, 
including the dividends paid in the year, was 
-20.8% (2022: -3.7%).

Strategic outlook
Whilst the economies of our three markets remain 
challenging, our priorities have remained steadfast. 
We will deliver lettings of our quality refurbishments 
to drive growth, make disposals at the right values 
to reduce LTV and be highly selective in considering 
acquisitions or developments, as well as execute 
our planned refinancings. These are alongside our 
vision to be a sustainably focused landlord which 
will be accomplished through executing our 2030 
Net Zero Carbon Pathway and supporting our local 
communities combined with delivering social value.

CLS has pursued a highly successful, focused 
strategy over the last 30 years concentrated 
on high-quality offices in Europe’s three largest 
economies whilst delivering shareholder value 
through our long-term approach. Our core strategy 
and business model remain unchanged but we will 
continue to evolve to meet market opportunities.

Dividends
Given the economic conditions, the Board has 
decided to propose a flat final 2023 dividend which 
results in a flat full year dividend. The dividend, 
which is 1.30x covered by EPRA earnings, is in-line 
with our policy of having the dividend covered 
1.2x-1.6x by EPRA earnings.

Our staff and our culture
Since 2020 it has been a volatile period for 
the office sector and for CLS, with the pandemic 
followed by higher interest rates and a challenging 
economy. Gratifyingly our staff have coped 
magnificently with all that has been thrown at 
them and, on behalf of the Board, I want to thank 
them for their dedication and hard work. CLS’ 
positive culture has been maintained throughout 
all the challenges and as interest rates fall and the 
cycle turns, I am confident that CLS will thrive and 
deliver for shareholders for many years to come.

Lennart Sten
Non-Executive Chairman

8 March 2024

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTChief Executive’s review

Fredrik Widlund
Chief Executive Officer

The return to the office
Since 2020, due to the disruption caused by 
the pandemic, working patterns have significantly 
changed and continue to evolve. The initial 
response was a wholesale shift to home working 
followed by many different hybrid working 
arrangements once the pandemic subsided.

Since the adoption of hybrid working, the last 
two years have seen office occupancy levels 
increasing in the UK and Europe, albeit it has 
been a slow recovery and attendance is much 
more concentrated around the middle of the week. 
However, ongoing company policy changes and 
surveys show that the return to the office trend 
is only likely to increase.

Recent surveys* showed that levels of flexible 
or home working look to have peaked and some 
are predicting a full return to in-office working 
by 2026. Whilst this may prove ambitious, the 
driver is that there is a growing recognition that 
the office is a marketplace of knowledge and so 
much more than an overhead cost: it has a decisive 
influence on productivity, employee retention, 
corporate culture, innovation, and thus long-term 
business results.

 CLS performed 

well during the 
period and made 
progress on its 
strategic objectives. 
Our high-quality 
estate underpinned 
strong leasing 
momentum and 
pricing with new 
leases nearly 7% 
above ERV. As a 
result, we held our 
underlying vacancy 
rates steady, and 
delivered net rental 
income growth of 
close to 5%. 

Our view is that hybrid working will continue 
for at least the short-to medium-term but that 
the actual reduction in space will be less than 
predicted. This is because tenants need to cope 
with peak worker occupancy, which determines 
the minimum amount of office space an occupier 
needs, and that sustainability requirements across 
all countries are reducing supply. This explains 
why the occupancy market continues to do well 
and we see a growing number of companies 
planning to lease more space.

All of this means that to bring employees back to 
the office, appropriate incentives must be created. 
Demand continues to intensify for well-connected, 
good-quality office space in mixed-use locations, 
and amid construction delays and shortage of 
good stock, occupiers will have to compete for 
the best space, supporting rental growth.

Delivering on our strategy
In response to these trends, CLS has focused 
on improving the quality of its properties and 
driving operational performance. With an 
uncertain market in 2023, CLS did not make any 
acquisitions and instead focussed on investing 
in our properties. In 2023, we finished the 
enhanced capital expenditure programme that 
we commenced in 2022 to deliver the higher 
quality offices demanded by tenants with capital 
expenditure of £50.1 million (2022: £58.3 million). 
The three largest schemes in this programme: 
Artesian, Prescot St, London; The Coade, Vauxhall, 
London; and Park Avenue, Lyon, were completed 
in 2023 or early 2024 and accounted for c. 40% 
of the capex spent this year. These buildings now 
offer a total of over 200,000 sq. ft of the highest 
quality space with excellent amenities and 
market-leading sustainability credentials.

As set out last year, we expected to be a 
net seller and in 2023 we disposed of five 
smaller properties (four completed and one 
unconditionally exchanged) across our three 
geographies at a net initial yield of 6.0% for 
£25.4 million at 10.0% above the properties’ 
latest valuations. We sold smaller properties 
in 2023 because there was a more liquid market 
for properties at this lot size. In addition, we are 
seeking to increase the average size of our 
properties as smaller properties usually consume 
a disproportionate amount of asset and property 
management time and are less economic to equip 
with the best amenities. Our LTV increased in 2023 
as a result of valuation reductions, with net debt 
little changed year-on-year, and thus in 2024 we 
will again target to be a net seller to reduce LTV 
to below 45% in the short-term and 40% in the 
medium-term. 

*  KPMG global CEO and Deloitte UK CFO 2023 surveys

7

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION As expected, 
valuations reduced 
in the period. 
However, our 
outperformance 
relative to the 
markets we 
operate in and the 
embedded rental 
growth potential 
in our portfolio 
give us confidence 
in our ability to 
deliver long-term 
growth. We remain 
focused on 
optimising our 
portfolio and 
reducing LTV 
through the 
course of 2024, 
with nearly 
three-quarters of 
the loans expiring 
in 2024 already 
refinanced, and 
over £270m of 
assets targeted 
for disposal. 

Chief Executive’s review continued

The other major focus in 2023 was ensuring that 
we delivered on our financing activity to ensure 
that we maintain sufficient liquidity and flexibility. 
This target was successfully executed with all 
2023 refinancings completed and, as at the end 
of February 2024, we have already completed 
over 70% of 2024 refinancings. More details on 
our progress in 2023 with capital expenditure, 
disposals, and refinancings, as well as lettings 
are set out in the strategy in action section on 
pages 18 to 21.

Asset and property management
Active asset management is a key part of CLS’ 
culture and business model with “our tenants, 
our focus” being one of our four values. Therefore, 
whilst the market remains challenging it is critical 
to drive asset management to create long-term 
value from our property portfolio. In 2023, the 
investment market remained subdued but the 
letting market was more buoyant and CLS signed 
89% more leases by rent in 2023 (130 leases 
for £15.5 million) than in 2022 (106 leases for 
£8.2 million). The new leases were signed on 
average at 6.9% above ERV.

As a result of this leasing activity and also 
expiries, like-for-like vacancy was relatively flat 
at 7.6%, however the overall Group EPRA vacancy 
rate increased to 11.0% (2022: 7.4%) due to the 
impact of our three large refurbishments at 
Artesian, The Coade and Park Avenue. This 
vacancy rate is above our long-term target of 5% 
and we are expecting vacancy to remain elevated 
in the short-term until we let this newly 
refurbished, high-quality space.

Reflecting these refurbishments, the vacancy 
position was mixed across the Group with 
considerable differences between countries. 
In France, the vacancy rate has risen to 5.6% 
(2022: 2.6%) as a result of refurbished space at 
Park Avenue being available to let. Demand 
remains good for smaller units (below 1,000 sqm) 
which fits with CLS France’s space offering, and 
we would expect vacancy to remain at this level 
in 2024. In Germany, the vacancy rate increased 
to 6.8% (2022: 6.1%) as the rate of lettings was 
slightly behind the rate of expiries. We have one 
big upcoming vacancy in Dortmund in 2024 which 
we are working hard to fill and, subject to this, 
we would expect vacancy to fall in 2024. With the 
completion of Artesian in Q4 2023 and Q1 2024, 
and little time to let the space, vacancy in the UK 
understandably rose significantly to 15.8% from 
10.0% in 2022. The letting market improved during 
the year, with far more lettings completed since 
September, and we are cautiously optimistic that 
UK vacancy will reduce, and rental income 
increase, in 2024.

8

Overall, our properties are multi-let with over 700 
tenants, of which 21% are government agencies, 
40% are large corporations and 16% are medium-
sized companies. Reflecting the strength of our 
tenant base, CLS’ rent collection has remained 
in excess of 99% before, during and after 
the pandemic.

In 2023, the value of the portfolio was down by 
12.3% over the year as a result of our revaluation 
declines of 12.5% in local currencies with the 
investment in the portfolio almost exactly offset 
by foreign exchange losses and property 
disposals. There were decreases in all countries 
with the UK down 16.7%, Germany down 9.1% 
and France down 9.1% in local currencies. 
It is worth noting that the shortening lease at 
Spring Gardens, the largest asset in the Group, 
leased by the National Crime Agency contributed 
c.16% of the UK reduction as the site is valued 
as a standing office investment and not as a 
development site. Across all countries, the 
increase in interest rates and the risk-off nature 
of investors impacted valuations. As ERVs were up 
in all three countries, the valuation declines were 
mainly a result of interest rate driven yield shifts, 
although, as always, there were also some 
regional and property specific differences.

Financial results
With the economic backdrop remaining challenging 
in 2023, CLS again delivered on its strategic 
objectives. Property valuations were down, but 
outperformed relative to the market, and whilst 
net rental income grew by 4.8% finance costs rose 
more quickly such that EPRA earnings were lower.

EPRA earnings per share fell 11.2% from 11.6p 
in 2022 to 10.3p in 2023 (IFRS loss per share 
2023: £(62.9)p, 2022: (20.2)p) as improved rental 
income from indexation, record hotel and student 
performance and the full-year impact of previous 
acquisitions, was more than offset by increased 
finance costs as CLS’ cost of debt rose from 
2.69% to 3.61% due to the impact of higher 
central bank rates on floating rate loans and 
refinanced debt. Operating loss for the year 
was £223.4 million (2022: loss £63.9 million).

EPRA NTA decreased by 23.2% (2022: 6.0% 
decrease) to 253.0 pence per share (IFRS net 
assets 2023: £929.2 million, 2022: £1,220.8 million), 
reflecting revaluation reductions of 12.5% in local 
currency, foreign exchange losses of £26.3m from 
the 2.1% strengthening of sterling against the euro 
(2022: £33.6 million gain) and the payment of the 
dividend, which was partly offset by EPRA earnings.

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTERV potential of the portfolio (£)

112.6

13.9

(0.2)

126.3

11.6

c.138

c.3

c.141

Contracted 
Rent

Vacant

Net 
Reversion

ERV

On-going 
refurbs & 
development

Potential 
ERV

Potential 
Developments

Post 
2025

At the year end, we had cash and cash equivalents 
of £70.6 million (2022: £113.9 million), as a result of 
the completion of the heightened investment in the 
portfolio, as well as £50.0 million of new, longer-
term, committed credit facilities (2022: £50.0 million). 
To give more liquidity and flexibility, we have also 
secured an additional £10 million overdraft in 
January 2024 and are actively considering options 
for our 2025 refinancings.

In 2023, we generated £45.9 million net cash from 
operating activities (2022: £43.0 million) compared 
with EPRA earnings of £40.9 million (2022: £47.0 million) 
showing the continued strong cash generation of 
our business model. Of this cash, £31.6 million 
(2022: £32.4 million) was paid as a dividend to 
shareholders. Overall, we balance the use of the 
cash generated between dividends and reinvestment 
in the business to drive the Total Accounting 
Return to shareholders, which was -20.8% in 2023 
(2022: -3.7%) due to the negative property revaluations.

 We firmly 

believe the outlook 
for high-quality 
offices is bright 
and we are seeing 
a clear trend of 
companies thinking 
strategically about 
the return to the 
office as a value 
driver for their 
businesses. 
The investments 
we have made and 
continue to make 
across our portfolio 
mean we are well 
placed to thrive. 

Sustainability
We continue to make progress against our 
Sustainability Strategy and improve our assets 
in line with our Net Zero Carbon Pathway. We 
completed 73 energy efficiency and PV projects 
(28% more than last year) saving an estimated 
741 tonnes of CO2e (2022: 612 CO2e), equivalent 
to taking over 165 cars off our roads for one year 
(https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-
equivalencies-calculator) and we have exceeded 
our energy usage target of 4% year-on-year 
reduction with an 8% reduction in 2023.

CLS reports under various national regulations 
as well as regional and international frameworks. 
Our EPRA sBPR Gold award demonstrates our 
commitment to transparency and maintaining 
our GRESB 4 star rating reflects our achievements 
across the whole business. At an asset level, 
we are compliant with MEES in the UK, Décret 
Tertiaire in France and maintained our ratings in 
BREEAM In-use, despite the tightening of the rules.

2024 and beyond
As in the previous two years, we have again 
included our rent progression waterfall chart 
which has been updated to show the changes and 
progress made in the year. In summary, it shows 
the more than 20% rental upside that exists within 
the portfolio, with a large proportion of it able to 
be captured quickly following the completion of 
major refurbishments/developments in 2023. 
Securing these rental increases is critical to drive 
rental growth in excess of rising financing costs 
and thus achieve higher profits.

In addition to these increases up to 2026, there is 
further potential from indexation, with over half 
the portfolio having contractual increases, and 
ongoing investment to focus the portfolio on faster 
growing properties. Post 2026, we have significant 
opportunities, in Zone 1 in London at New Printing 
House Square and Spring Gardens. 

Despite the challenging market, CLS’ long-term 
strategy and our focus on the three largest countries 
in Europe, with the cities with the highest growth 
prospects such as London, Paris, Berlin and Munich, 
remains unchanged. And, in the medium term, we 
will again pursue acquisitive growth. Operationally 
the key objective for 2024 is to reduce vacancy to 
capture the substantial rental upside within the 
portfolio. Regarding capital and the balance sheet, 
the focus is on executing upcoming refinancings and 
reducing LTV through selective disposals and one of 
the actions we are taking is the marketing for sale 
of our Spring Mews student property in Vauxhall. 

We remain confident that in responding to the 
demands to return to the office by having some 
of the best properties in our locations, alongside 
an expectation of more favourable monetary 
policies and an improving macro-economic 
environment, CLS is well placed to capitalise on 
these trends and remain successful in the future. 

Fredrik Widlund
Chief Executive Officer

8 March 2024

9

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
Market review 

VALUE OF PROPERT Y PORTFOLIO 

NUMBER OF TENANTS 

£919.9m

221

GOVERNMENT AND  
LARGE COMPANIES

72.1%

PERCENTAGE OF GROUP’S   
PROPERT Y INTERESTS

45%

EPRA VACANCY RATE 

15.8%

YEARS WEIGHTED AVERAGE   
LEASE LENGTH TO END

3.5

NUMBER OF PROPERTIES

LETTABLE SPACE

LEASES SUBJECT TO INDEX ATION

37

1.9msq. ft

32.7%

i

m
o
d
g
n
K
d
e
t
i
n
U

10

Market overview
The UK economy continued to grow over the 
course of 2023 albeit at a modest 0.3% due the 
higher interest rates policies being used to reduce 
inflation. Unemployment increased slightly to 
4.0% but compared well to other major European 
economies. UK inflation fell to 7.4%.

The 2023 UK property investment market had 
a volume of c.£34bn, which was 39% down on 
the previous year reflecting on-going uncertainty 
as property investors worried about valuations 
and re-financing risks.

Office take-up in central London was 16% down 
compared to 2022 although the latter part of the 
year showed encouraging signs of recovery with 
Q4 growing over 20% compared to the previous 
quarter. The wider Greater London and South-East 
office market was down 17% for the year but also 
saw take-up increase in Q4 compared to the 
previous quarter. Consequently, year-end vacancy 
in the London market was up from 8.7% to 9.1% 
while the South-East market was flat at 11.8%.

UK VACANCY R ATES

16.0%

12.0%

8.0 %

4.0 %

0.0 %

2020
Q1

2020
Q2

2020
Q3

2020
Q4

2021
Q1

2021
Q2

2021
Q3

2021
Q4

2022
Q1

2022
Q2

2022
Q3

2022
Q4

2023
Q1

2023
Q2

2023
Q3

2023
Q4

 CLS UK

 LONDON

 SOUTH EAST 

Source: Cushman & Wakefield

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORT 
 
Portfolio movement and valuation summary
In 2023, the value of the UK portfolio decreased 
by £150.8 million as a result of a revaluation 
decline of £184.5 million or 16.7% in local currency 
and disposals of £3.9 million, partly offset by net 
capital expenditure of £37.6 million (including 
depreciation of £0.1 million). 

The 16.7% valuation decline was as a result of 
equivalent yields expanding by 79 basis points on 
a like-for-like basis and increased vacancy from 
completed refurbishments, with some offset from 
ERVs increasing by 1.1% on a like-for-like basis 
and some lease indexation. CLS’ valuation decline 
was in-line with the UK office market valuation 
decline but if the valuation of Spring Gardens, 
which was significantly impacted by the shortening 
lease, is excluded then CLS was ahead with a 
14.0% valuation decline.

Asset management
The EPRA vacancy rate increased to 15.8% as 
at 31 December 23 (2022: 10.0%) as result of 
a number of significant refurbishments and 
developments, particularly the Coade and Artesian, 
being completed in 2023 and the start of 2024. 
However, given greater letting activity in the 
second half of the year, like-for like vacancy 
reduced from 10.0% to 9.8%. Most encouragingly 
we saw a growing trend among our UK occupiers 
to return to the office and in a number of cases 
they have taken additional space to create a more 
attractive and vibrant environment for their staff.

In 2023, we let or renewed leases on 417,494 sq. ft 
and lost 430,183 sq. ft of space from expiries. 
Excluding rent reviews, 60 lease extensions and new 
leases secured £7.4 million of rent at an average of 
4.6% above ERV. The most significant transactions 
included a new 10-year lease with Hays Recruitment 
for 9,673 sq. ft of space at the newly refurbished 
Apex Tower in New Malden and the lease renewal 
with Honda Motor Europe for their European HQ 
(57,436 sq. ft) at Reflex in Bracknell for 10 years. 

In 2023, we agreed the surrender of the head 
lease with the Secretary of State for New Printing 
House Square which is a prominent building of 
c.200,000 sq. ft on Grays Inn Road in Central 
London. The head lease was due to expire in 
June 2025 and the building was fully sub-let on 
co-terminus leases to a variety of private sector 
occupiers. As a result, we now benefit from an 
additional rent roll of c.£1m above the previous 
rent received as well as having a direct 
relationship with the occupiers which presents 
opportunities for retaining them from June 
2025 onwards.

Both our student and hotel operations achieved 
record breaking years, surpassing the previous 
records set in 2022. The student accommodation 
was fully let for the 2023/24 academic year and 
sales for 2024/25 are significantly ahead of 
expectations. Due to some refurbishment, 
occupancy at the hotel averaged 87% for 2023, 
the same as 2022, however average daily rates rose 
by 12% which significantly increased profitability.

UNITED KINGDOM 
LONDON  
SOUTH EAST  
BIRMINGHAM  

37
27
9
1

In 2023, in conjunction with Savills, we carried out 
a review of all of our UK properties in response to 
nationwide concerns regarding Reinforced Autoclaved 
Aerated Concrete (“RAAC”) and found no issues. 

Developments and refurbishments
Total capital expenditure was £37.7 million 
with The Coade and Artesian being our largest 
schemes. The construction of The Coade, our 
27,700 sq. ft new office development in Vauxhall, 
completed in Q2 2023. In Q4 2023, we also 
completed the first phase (Basement to 3rd floor) 
of “Artesian”, a 96,000 sq. ft refurbishment at 
9 Prescot Street, London with the final phase 
4th to 6th floor being fully competed in Q1 2024. 
Successful agents’ launches for each building 
were held shortly after completion of the 
refurbishments. 

At Spring Gardens, which is let to the National 
Crime Agency until February 2026, we are working 
up the planning application for a major mixed-use 
development of the two and a half-acre plot 
assuming the NCA were to leave. 

Disposals
During 2023, we continued with our strategy 
of disposing of some of our smaller assets. This 
included the sale of St Cloud Gate in Maidenhead, 
a 9,700 sq. ft office building as well as The Rose 
pub in Vauxhall. The total consideration received 
for these assets was £4.3 million, which was 
16.4% above the latest valuations.

The sale of Westminster Tower, which has planning 
consent for conversion to residential use, exchanged 
unconditionally in June 2023 with a completion 
date of 30 November 2023. However, the buyer 
failed to complete in 2023 and thus the deposit 
was called in 2024, and the property is now 
being re-marketed for sale. As a result, this 
was not recognised as a disposal in the 2023 
financial statements. 

Outlook
The consensus forecast for the UK economy is to 
grow at around 0.4% but with higher growth in the 
latter part of the year as the economy improves. 
Unemployment is forecast to increase marginally 
to 4.6%.

The investment market is likely to remain sluggish 
for the first half of the year but with improvements 
in the occupational market and strong rental 
growth, the attractiveness of commercial real 
estate as an asset class should improve, 
especially once financing costs begin to fall.

The recent improvements in the occupational market 
together with increased office requirements, means 
that we expect good opportunities to let our recent 
developments while our UK vacancy should reduce 
on the back of our recent capex upgrade programme 
alongside more occupiers returning to the office. 

CLS HOLDINGS PLC  Annual Report and Accounts 2023

11

 Most 

encouragingly 
we saw a growing 
trend among our 
UK occupiers to 
return to the office 
and in a number 
of cases they have 
taken additional 
space to create 
a more attractive 
and vibrant 
environment 
for their staff. 

Dan Howson
Head of UK

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONMarket review continued

VALUE OF PROPERT Y PORTFOLIO 

NUMBER OF TENANTS 

£885.5m 

368

GOVERNMENT AND  
LARGE COMPANIES

55.6%

PERCENTAGE OF GROUP’S   
PROPERT Y INTERESTS

43%

EPRA VACANCY RATE

6.8%

YEARS WEIGHTED AVERAGE   
LEASE LENGTH TO END

4.9

NUMBER OF PROPERTIES

LETTABLE SPACE

LEASES SUBJECT TO INDEX ATION

32

3.8msq. ft

65.9%

y
n
a
m
r
e
G

Market overview
Germany had a tumultuous year in 2023 with 
Europe’s biggest economy contracting 0.3% because 
of low business confidence, budgetary pressures 
and higher energy prices. Unemployment held up 
well at 5.7% while higher interest rates had the 
desired impact on inflation which shrank to 6.1%. 

The German property investment market had 
a challenging year and investment volumes were 
down by 56% to c.€23 billion in 2023 reflecting 
hesitant buyers due to the interest rate trajectory 
and concerns about the development of 
the economy. 

In the occupational market, leasing transactional 
volumes were down over 20% with less space let 
across the seven largest cities with only Dusseldorf 
and Frankfurt showing single-figure reductions. 
Vacancy increased to 5.7% for the seven largest 
cities ranging from 3.3% in Cologne to 9.7% in 
Dusseldorf. The majority of CLS properties are 
located in Hamburg, Munich, Berlin and Dusseldorf 
which saw strong rental growth for quality space.

GERMANY  VACANCY R ATES

12.0%

10.0%

8.0 %

6.0 %

4.0 %

2.0 %

0.0 %

2020
Q1

2020
Q2

2020
Q3

2020
Q4

2021
Q1

2021
Q2

2021
Q3

2021
Q4

2022
Q1

2022
Q2

2022
Q3

2022
Q4

2023
Q1

2023
Q2

2023
Q3

2023
Q4

12

 CLS GERMANY

 HAMBURG

 MUNICH

 BERLIN

 DÜSSELDORF

 STUT TGART

 FRANKFURT

 COLOGNE
Source: JLL

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTPortfolio movement and valuation summary
In 2023, the value of the German portfolio 
decreased by £110.5 million as a result of a 
revaluation decline of £89.1 million or 9.1% in 
local currency; a foreign exchange decrease of 
£20.4 million; and disposals of £10.2 million, partly 
offset by net capital expenditure of £9.2 million 
(including depreciation of £0.1 million). 

The 9.1% valuation decline resulted from 
equivalent yields expanding by 36 basis points 
on a like-for-like basis and marginally increased 
vacancy, with some offset from ERVs increasing 
by 2.4% on a like-for-like basis and the majority 
of leases being indexed.

According to the VDP banking association, office 
property values in Germany fell by 13.3% which 
compares to the fall in CLS’ property values 
of 9.1%. This outperformance of CLS’ German 
properties can be partly explained by our focus on 
government agencies and “Mittelstand” companies.

Asset management
The EPRA vacancy rate increased from 6.1% in 
2022 to 6.8% at the end of 2023. This increase was 
despite some significant letting successes during 
the year with expiries in excess of lettings. 

In 2023, we let or renewed leases on 17,008 sqm and 
lost 25,123 sqm of space from expiries. Excluding 
those arising from contractual indexation uplifts, 
36 lease extensions and new leases secured 
£5.2 million of rent at an average of 14.8% above 
ERV (£2.6 million at 6.6% above ERV excluding 
Essen as described below). Leases subject to 
indexation increased by an average of 7.1%. 

The largest transaction in 2023 was a 30-year, 
index-linked lease signed in June 2023 with the 
City of Essen for £2.6 million of rent at 24.3% 
above ERV. The significant refurbishment will 
start in mid-2024, following which the interior 
department will take occupation in July 2025 
at which point the building will be fully occupied. 
Further details are in the strategy in action case 
study on page 20.

Developments and refurbishments
No significant individual property refurbishments 
or extensions were carried out in 2023. However, 
in advance of potential future development, the 
planning permissions for the roof top extension 
at Adlershofer Tor, Berlin and the new building at 
Lichthof, Stuttgart were extended for a further three 
years to allow for market conditions to improve.

GERMANY 
HAMBURG 
MUNICH 
BERLIN 
DÜSSELDORF  
STUT TGART  
DORTMUND  
COLOGNE  
NUREMBERG  
BOCHUM 
ESSEN  

32
8
6
4
4
3
3
1
1
1
1

 Office take-up 
is expected to be 
patchy with larger 
corporates still 
grappling with the 
changing economic 
landscape while 
demand from 
small- to medium-
sized companies 
and public bodies, 
which plays to 
CLS’ strengths, 
remains resilient. 

Rolf Mensing
Head of Germany

Smaller refurbishments continued with £9.3 million 
spent across our portfolio to improve the quality of 
our properties to meet tenants’ needs and enhance 
their sustainability credentials. 

A good example is at Fleethaus in Hamburg, where 
we carried out a refurbishment of the façade to 
improve its energy efficiency and to maintain the 
architectural and cultural heritage of the City of 
Hamburg. In 2024, in addition to our investment 
in Essen, we are also targeting to start a major 
refurbishment for half of the building at 
Bismarkstrasse in Berlin with the aim of driving 
rents from the previous passing level of €11 sqm 
to €30 sqm. 

Disposals
In 2023, we disposed of a small property in 
Germany in Germering, Munich for €5.9 million 
and one piece of land in Sweden for SEK80.0 million 
in Hyllinge, which is included in the German segment 
for ease of disclosure and as it was our last property 
in Sweden. On a combined basis, the two properties 
sold for 19.5% above the latest valuations. There 
were no acquisitions in the year.

Outlook
The consensus forecast is for German GDP to grow 
0.2% in 2024 and unemployment to remain at current 
levels. Germany has now successfully reduced its 
dependence on Russian gas which will help lower 
inflation and support the strong export industry that 
is the backbone of German industrial success. 

The investment market is expected to be even more 
nuanced with small- to medium-sized buildings below 
€50 million, with good sustainability credentials and 
transportation links, selling whilst other properties, 
especially in out-of-town business park areas or large 
lot sizes, will continue to struggle.

Office take-up is expected to be patchy with larger 
corporates still grappling with the changing 
economic landscape while demand from small- to 
medium-sized companies and public bodies, which 
plays to CLS’ strengths, remains resilient. We have 
only one big upcoming vacancy in 2024, which is at 
Gotic Haus in Dortmund. Discussions with potential 
tenants are ongoing, and subject to a successful 
outcome, and in combination with a general market 
reduction in development activity, we would expect 
vacancy to fall in our German portfolio in 2024.

CLS HOLDINGS PLC  Annual Report and Accounts 2023

13

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
Market review continued

VALUE OF PROPERT Y PORTFOLIO 

NUMBER OF TENANTS 

£257.5m

155

GOVERNMENT AND  
LARGE COMPANIES

49.0%

PERCENTAGE OF GROUP’S   
PROPERT Y INTERESTS

12%

EPRA VACANCY RATE 

5.6%

YEARS WEIGHTED AVERAGE   
LEASE LENGTH TO END

5.2

NUMBER OF PROPERTIES

LETTABLE SPACE

LEASES SUBJECT TO INDEX ATION

17

0.8msq. ft

100.0%

e
c
n
a
r
F

Market overview
The French economy achieved GDP growth of 0.9% 
in 2023 with unemployment steady at around 7.3%. 
Inflation in France, which started the year lower than 
many other European countries, fell to 5.7%. All of this 
was against a backdrop of increasing ECB base rates 
which went from 2.5% at the start of 2023 to 4.5% 
by the end of the year. 

In 2023, transaction volumes in the French property 
market fell by 53% to c. €12 billion. This was not only 
as a result of a decrease in the number of transactions 
but also the average value, reflecting our experience 
that investors are less willing to commit to 
larger purchases.

In the occupational market, after a strong year 
in 2022, office take-up in Greater Paris in 2023 
was down by double digit percentages, although 
vacancy was only up slightly at 8.5% from 7.9% 
but with continuing large variances between the 
districts. Vacancy in the Paris CBD was 2.5% but 
higher in the outer districts with 15% in La Défence. 
CLS’ properties are located in the West and South 
side of Paris, straddling both areas. The Lyon 
market continued to perform comparably well but 
even here market vacancy rose from 4.4% to 4.9%.

FRANCE  VACANCY R ATES

8.0%

6.0 %

4.0 %

2.0 %

0.0 %

2020
Q1

2020
Q2

2020
Q3

2020
Q4

2021
Q1

2021
Q2

2021
Q3

2021
Q4

2022
Q1

2022
Q2

2022
Q3

2022
Q4

2023
Q1

2023
Q2

2023
Q3

2023
Q4

14

 CLS FRANCE

 PARIS

 LYON

Source: Immostat/JLL

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTPortfolio movement and valuation summary
In 2023, the value of the French portfolio 
decreased by £28.6 million as a result of a 
revaluation decline of £25.8 million or 9.1% 
(2022: 5.3%) in local currency, and a foreign 
exchange decrease of £5.9 million, partly offset 
by capital expenditure of £3.1 million. The 9.1% 
valuation decline was as a result of equivalent 
yields expanding by 82 basis points on a like-for-
like basis and increased vacancy, with some offset 
from ERVs increasing by 1.3% on a like-for-like 
basis and all leases being indexed. CLS 
outperformed the market and peers whose 
offices fell in value by over 12%.

Asset management
EPRA vacancy in the French portfolio increased to 
5.6% as at 31 December 2023 (2022: 2.6%) with the 
increase exclusively driven by the completion of 
Park Avenue in Lyon for which two and half floors 
(c.3,100 sqm) were vacant at the year end. 

In 2023, we let or renewed leases on 13,245 sqm 
and lost 15,130 sqm of space from expiries. 
Excluding contractual indexation uplifts, 34 lease 
extensions and new leases secured £2.9 million 
of rent at an average of 0.1% above ERV. The most 
significant transactions during this year were 
Pole Emploi at Les Reflets in Lille for 2,499 sqm 
and Exalog at Bellevue in Paris for 1,039 sqm. 
On a like-for-like basis, ERVs increased by 1.3%, 
with index-linked rental increases at an 
average of 5.6%.

Developments and refurbishments
In 2023, we completed the elevated level of capital 
expenditure spend across the French portfolio, 
incurring £3.1 million, with the completion of the 
major refurbishment of Park Avenue in Lyon. The 
refurbishment was finished in the middle of the 
year with the final €0.9 million spent in 2023 out 
of a total project cost of €9.1 million.

The works involved refurbishing common areas 
such as reception, lifts, landings, toilets, and 
a replacement of the façade with stone, new 
windows and electric shades. The outside works 
also included a green roof, new ground floor 
landscaping, the painting of the car park and the 
creation of new common terraces through the 
extension of existing landings. These works have 
not only improved tenants’ amenities but have 
also resulted in an a significant improvement 
in the building’s sustainability credentials 
(increasing from DPE G to DPE B).

FRANCE 
PARIS  
LYON  
LILLE  

17
11
5
1

Tenants for five of the ten floors were decanted to 
a nearby building whilst the works were carried 
out. Following a successful building launch at the 
start of 2023, a further three floors have been let. 
There is good interest in the remaining two and half 
floors and we are confident of letting these in 2024. 

Disposals
In 2023, we unconditionally exchanged on Quatuor, 
a building located in the Montrouge area in Paris. 
The 2,500 sqm office building was originally 
acquired for €4.6m in 2002 and is located in front 
of the future Grand Paris metro station. The 
building is therefore strategic for the City of 
Montrouge, which agreed to buy the property for 
€11.3 million, 2.8% ahead of the June 2023 
valuation. In December 2023, we received 10% of 
the purchase price with the remaining 90% to be 
received by June 2024; until then CLS manages 
and collects the rent for the property. 

Some more details on the Quatuor sale and the 
Park Avenue refurbishment are included in the 
strategy in action case studies on pages 18 to 21.

Outlook
GDP consensus forecast is for France to grow 
around 0.7% which, although modest, is above 
both the UK and German consensus, and for 
unemployment to stay at current levels. 

With Anglo-Saxon investors notably absent, 
the investment market has been driven by 
domestic and other European investors. Whether 
this will change in 2024 remains to be seen but we 
do expect a gradual return to mainland Europe’s 
second largest economy as markets and the 
interest rate stabilises.

Office take-up has been volatile in the last two 
years but smaller floorplates below 1,000 sqm 
have consistently performed better which has 
benefitted CLS’ portfolio due to the size and 
layout characteristics of our properties. 

We expect CLS vacancy to remain around 5% 
in 2024 with the newly refurbished space in 
Park Avenue let being offset by expiries in 
Front de Parc, located close to Park Avenue 
in the Villeurbanne-Tonkin district of Lyon, 
which will be available in the second half 
of the year following refurbishment.

In the wider market, we expect to see continued 
varied markets across Paris, driven by different 
supply dynamics, and Lyon continuing to perform 
well due to a much tighter market and restrictive 
policies for new developments.

CLS HOLDINGS PLC  Annual Report and Accounts 2023

15

 Office take-up 
has been volatile 
in the last two 
years but smaller 
floorplates below 
1,000 sqm have 
consistently 
performed better 
which has 
benefitted CLS’ 
portfolio due to 
the size and layout 
characteristics of 
our properties. 

Philippe Alexis
Head of France

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONStrategy and business model
Realising value and  
reinvesting for the future

We acquire the right properties
We invest in commercial real estate 
in the UK, Germany and France.  
89% of our properties are offices.

resources are supplemented by 
disposal proceeds from selling 
assets which present limited future 
opportunities to add value.

We look to acquire high quality 
properties with good transport  
links located in key European cities.

Most of our properties are multi-let 
to a wide variety of occupiers, giving 
us the opportunity to add value 
whilst spreading our risk.

The cost of buying investment 
properties is met partly from the 
Group’s liquid resources and partly 
from external financing. Liquid 

We have the ability to move quickly 
due to our strong balance sheet.

Our in-house sustainability 
programme is focused on mitigating 
our impact on climate change and 
continually improving our properties. 
We consider sustainability in all  
our acquisitions.

KPIs/OPIs 
•  TSR – Relative
•  Total accounting 

return

Link to principal risks
•  Property risk
•  Sustainability risk

   For more information  
see page 18

We continually assess whether to hold or sell properties

Our active management is also 
applied at a portfolio level, 
continually assessing whether 
properties meet return criteria  
and/or we can continue to add value.

We have an asset management  
plan for each asset which we 
flex depending upon tenant 
requirements and leasing activity.

Refurbishments are undertaken to 
enhance the portfolio and capture 
rental growth.

KPIs/OPIs 
•  TSR – Relative
•  Total accounting 

return

Link to principal risks
•  Business  

interruption risk

•  People risk

   For more information  
see page 21

Our portfolio approach also includes 
assessing whether greater value 
can be captured through a change 
of use, for example, a residential 
conversion. In such cases, after 
planning permission has been 
obtained, the property will usually  
be sold to a developer. 

At the appropriate time, we will  
also dispose of properties which  
are too small or too low yielding or 
for which the risk/reward balance  
is unfavourable.

One of our decision criteria is the 
sustainability rating of the property 
and the cost to make enhancements.

16

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTWe secure the right finance 
Most of our properties are held in 
their own SPVs, and are financed 
with bank loans borrowed by the 
SPV on a non-recourse, ring-fenced 
basis to the rest of the Group.

We have the flexibility to borrow at 
fixed or floating rates of interest and, 
by borrowing against each asset, we 
are able to use a level of gearing 
suitable to the specific property.

Where properties are more suited to 
being financed together, such as on 
the acquisition of a larger portfolio, 
we finance them under one loan, 

usually with the flexibility  
to withdraw properties from  
charge and to substitute others.

Our bank borrowing is typically for 
five or seven years, and as most 
of our debt is obtained from local 
banks, we have active relationships 
with over 25 lenders around Europe, 
which spreads our risk.

In everything we do to secure the 
right finance, we aim to generate 
responsible profit through creating 
sustainable long-term decisions with 
the environment in mind.

KPIs/OPIs 
•  Cost of debt

Link to principal risks
•  Financing risk

   For more information  
see page 19

We deliver value through active management and cost control 

The key to active management is 
to perform it in-house, because, 
by using our own employees, we 
harness greater motivation, response 
times and attention to detail than 
if tasks were to be outsourced.

In-house management includes 
asset management (leasing), property 
management (refurbishments), 
facilities management (day-to-day 
maintenance), development 
management, tenant billing and 
debt collection, and purchase ledger 
and service charge management.

By performing all of these functions 
in-house we control costs through 
efficient working and we maintain our 
revenue stream through providing a 
first-rate service to our customers.

KPIs/OPIs 
•  Vacancy rate 
•  Administration  

cost ratios

This approach also allows us to 
develop and embed positive 
environmental behaviours across our 
managed landscape which supports 
our impact on climate change. 

All of the above gives our 
shareholders confidence in  
our day-to-day management.

Link to principal risks
•  Sustainability risk
•  Political and 
economic risk

   For more information  
see page 20

We reward shareholders, customers and employees 

We aim to grow the dividend in line 
with the growth of the business, 
targeting the dividend to be covered 
1.2 to 1.6 times by EPRA earnings. 
The proposed full year dividend 
represents £31.6 million of the 
£40.9 million of EPRA earnings in 2023.

The balance is reinvested in the 
business, increasing the size of the 
Group. In this way shareholders can 
be rewarded partly in cash and 
partly in the capital appreciation of 
their shares. As only CLS’ UK 
business is a REIT, we have flexibility 
in the amount we are required to 
distribute to shareholders, which 

benefits the business in the 
longer term.

Our tenants are our customers. 
They benefit from a landlord 
who understands their needs 
and who provides cost-effective 
accommodation through investing  
its profits back into its business.

KPIs/OPIs 
•  Dividend cover
•  Staff turnover

Link to principal risks
•  People risk

   For more information  
see pages 22 to 23

We reward employees for their work 
and their loyalty, through salaries 
and bonus schemes which reflect  
the success of the business, thereby 
aligning their interests with our 
shareholders and our customers.

CLS HOLDINGS PLC  Annual Report and Accounts 2023

17

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONStrategy in action

We acquire 
the right 
properties

Strategy
We invest in high-yielding properties, 
predominantly offices, with a focus on 
cash returns. We diversify market risk 
by investing in geographical areas with 
differing characteristics and also seek 
to diversify the tenant base.

Strategy implementation
We target modern, high quality properties with 
good asset management opportunities in larger 
cities in the UK, German and France. In addition 
to geographic diversity, we have a wide variety 
of tenants in many different sectors and we 
invest in Sterling and Euros.

Our performance in 2023
•  As previously announced, CLS was not 

targeting acquisitions in 2023 but instead was 
focussed on reducing LTV through disposals

•  We did though continue to invest in our 

portfolio to improve its quality and meet 
tenant needs as well as finishing our three 
major refurbishments/development

•  In 2023, we spent £50.1 million of capital 
expenditure which included £19.6 million 
on the refurbishments at Prescot St, 
London and Park Avenue, Lyon as well as 
the development at The Coade, London

Priorities for 2024
•  We will continue to invest in our property 
portfolio to improve its quality which also 
includes sustainability enhancements as 
per our Net Zero Carbon Pathway. Capital 
expenditure will return to historical levels 
of around £30 million in 2024

•  As in 2023, CLS will be selective in 

considering acquisitions or developments 
in 2024 and instead focus on reducing LTV 
through disposals 

18

CASE STUDY

Providing  
high-quality offices
Prescot Street, London, 
United Kingdom

•  In 2019, CLS purchased 9 Prescot 
Street which was an Art Deco 
era 96,000 sq. ft office building

•  In 2022 and 2023 we carried 
out a £31 million full building 
refurbishment to deliver 
outstanding quality space
•  Key areas of improvement 

include: amenities (new 4,000 sq. 
ft roof terrace); sustainability 
(Cyclescore Platinum); health & 
wellbeing (increased fresh air 
rates); flexibility (different space 
configurations); and digital 
(Wiredscore Platinum)

•  Rents of £50-£60/sq. ft are 

targeted across the six floors

 The investment 

CLS has made in 
improving its 
portfolio is 
exemplified by the 
outstanding quality 
of Prescot Street, 
which has been 
awarded an EPC A 
and is now 
available to let 
to tenants. 

Helen Pilcher
Head of UK 
Development 

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTStrategy in action

We secure the 
right finance

Strategy
Whilst CLS has several financing strategic 
objectives, the key ones are to: target a low cost 
of debt whilst maintaining an appropriate LTV; 
to maintain a high proportion of fixed rate debt; 
to utilise diversified sources of finance to reduce 
risk; and to maintain a high level of liquid resources.

Strategy implementation
To meet CLS’ strategic objectives, we: aim to 
keep cost of debt at least 200 basis points below 
net initial yield albeit this depends on market 
conditions; execute fixed rate debt loans or use 
interest rate caps and hedges; have strong 
relationships with over 25 lending institutions 
which each have less than 20% of our total loan 
exposure and own properties in special purpose 
vehicles financed individually or in small portfolios 
by non-recourse debt in the currency used to 
purchase the asset; and keep at least £100 million 
in cash and undrawn facilities.

As noted in the Going Concern assessment on 
page 54, CLS’ business model relies upon the 
refinancing of loans annually, as well as disposals, 
for which we have a successful track record.

Our performance in 2023
•  Financed, refinanced or extended eleven 

loans for £330.6 million 

•  These loans were at a weighted average 
duration of 3.0 years and at a weighted 
all-in rate of 5.27%

•  These loans encompassed all of 2023 

and over 50% of 2024 expiring financings 
(now over 70%)

•  In addition, we replaced £50 million of expiring 
RCFs and overdraft facilities with a 3+1+1 year 
£30 million RCF and a 2+1 year £20 million RCF

Priorities for 2024
•  To complete five or six refinancings across 
Germany and France for £68.0 million or 
£98.3 million depending on sales
•  To execute one financing for a recent 

refurbishment and two capex facilities 
for upcoming refurbishments

•  To progress 2025 refinancings of £399.2 million

CASE STUDY

Key 2023 refinancing
Adlershofer Tor,  
Berlin, Germany

•  Our 20,000 sqm mixed use building 
has minimal vacancy with a major 
food retailer occupying over 40% 
of the space and the rest offices
•  The existing loan of €25.2 million 
with PBB was expiring at the end 
April 2023

•  At the end of March 2023, 
we secured a 5-year loan 
for €45.0 million with 
Berliner Sparkasse

•  The 4.61% fixed rate interest-
only loan is at 52% LTV and 
has no amortisation and no 
financial covenants

 The strength 
of CLS’ lending 
relationship 
allowed CLS to 
complete all of its 
2023 refinancings 
successfully and 
make significant 
progress with 2024 
refinancings. 

Alain Millet
Group Treasurer 

CLS HOLDINGS PLC  Annual Report and Accounts 2023

19

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONStrategy in action

We deliver value 
through active 
management 
and cost control

Strategy
Our overall objective is to maintain a high 
occupancy for our properties alongside a 
diversified customer base which is underpinned 
by a strong core income stream. In conjunction 
with driving letting performance, we maintain 
strict cost control.

Strategy implementation
In order to deliver on high occupancy and 
cost control, we use in-house staff wherever 
appropriate. Consequently, we use in-house 
local asset and property managers who 
maintain close links with occupiers to 
understand their needs. Our focus is on the 
quality of service and accommodation for 
our customers. On the cost side, we perform 
as many back-office functions as possible 
in-house and monitor our performance 
against our peer group.

Our performance in 2023
•  Completed 130 lease events securing 

£15.5 million of annual rent at 6.9% above 
ERV with like-for-like contracted rent 
increasing by 5.1%

•  Underlying vacancy was essentially flat at 

7.6% but the overall vacancy rate increased 
to 11.0%. The increase was due to completion 
of developments currently being marketed 
to prospective tenants

•  The bad debt provision reduced by 

£0.9 million due to better recovery of old 
debts and rent collection remained at the 
same, consistently high level of 99%

Priorities for 2024
•  Increase letting activity, particularly in the 

UK and for recently completed refurbishments

•  Reduce vacancy levels below 11.0% and 

over time bring down to our historic target 
level of 5.0%

•  Maintain rent collection levels and actively 
manage bad debts as well as continue cost 
control measures

20

 The long-term 
lease with the City 
of Essen allows 
CLS to invest in 
a comprehensive 
refurbishment 
programme to 
offer modern 
and sustainable 
offices of the 
highest quality. 

Einar Osterhage
Head of German 
Asset Management

CASE STUDY

One of CLS Germany’s 
largest-ever leases
The Brix, Essen, 
Germany

•  The Brix in Essen is a 17,400 sqm 
office which was bought in 2021 
with 28% vacancy

•  In June 2023, CLS signed a 30-year 

lease with the City of Essen. 
The lease also benefits from 
being index-linked. Servicing local 
government agencies is one of 
CLS’ specialisms and they are our 
largest tenant segment

•  Over the next two years, CLS will 

spend c.€20 million to substantially 
improve the building with a host 
of energy efficiency, sustainability 
and wellbeing initiatives to provide 
high-quality and flexible workspace

•  It is expected that the works will 
complete in mid-2025 and be 
part-funded from a new capex facility

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTWe continually 
assess whether 
to hold or sell 
properties

Strategy
Our focus is to hold those properties with the 
potential to add value through active asset 
management. We dispose of those properties; 
which are too small or too low yielding; for 
which the risk/reward balance is unfavourable; 
or for which the acquisition business plan has 
been executed and there is limited active asset 
management potential.

Strategy implementation
We have an asset management plan for every 
property which we flex to capture rental and 
capital growth via leasing and refurbishment 
activity. We will also assess whether greater 
value can be captured through a change of use. 
If a decision to dispose of a property is made, we 
will seek to optimise the timing of sales depending 
on market conditions, the characteristics of the 
property and the overall portfolio composition.

Our performance in 2023
•  Disposed of five properties (four completions 
and one unconditional exchange) across all 
of our geographies for £25.4 million, 10.0% 
ahead of the pre-sale valuations. Deferred 
consideration of €10.2 million on one sale 
is due before June 2024, see case study.

•  The sale of Westminster Tower unconditionally 
exchanged in June 2023 with a completion date 
of 30 November 2023. However, the buyer failed 
to complete and therefore we have called on 
the deposit.

Priorities for 2024
•  We are targeting to sell up to 6 properties 
with a book value of £172.7 million, as set 
out in our assets held for sale. In addition, 
we are starting to market for sale our Spring 
Mews student property.

•  We are targeting to reduce LTV to 45% in the 

short-term and below 40% in the medium term. 
The disposal of all the properties which are held 
for sale plus the student building would reduce 
proforma LTV to 40.8%

 The 

unconditional 
exchange of 
Quatuor allows CLS 
to exit a small 
property at above 
book value through 
identifying the right 
strategic buyer to 
maximise the value 
of the asset. 

Ly David
Asset Manager, France

CASE STUDY

Transaction with  
strategic buyer
Quatuor, Paris, France

•  Our property is a 2,500 sqm office, 
with a small amount of vacancy, 
located in front of one of the new 
Grand Paris Metro extension stations

•  CLS engaged with the City of 
Montrouge, which had a pre-
emption right over the property, 
to determine the best possible 
price as it was the most likely buyer

•  The sale price of €11.31 million 
was 2.8% above the 30 June 
2023 valuation

•  In December 2023, unconditional 
exchange occurred and 10% of 
the purchase price was received. 
The remaining 90% of the purchase 
price will be received before June 
2024 when the remainder of the 
loan will be repaid and the sale 
recognised. CLS will receive the rent 
from the building until that time

CLS HOLDINGS PLC  Annual Report and Accounts 2023

21

STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONKey performance indicators
Measuring the performance of our strategy 

.

0
2
1

.

2
2
1

.

6
1
1

.

3
1
1

.

3
0
1

9
1
0
2

0
2
0
2

1
2
0
2

2
2
0
2

3
2
0
2

7
3

.

)
7
3
(

.

.

)
8
0
2
(

10

4
9

.

1
8

.

0

-10

-20

-30

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

.

0
1
1

4
7

.

.

8
5

1
5

.

.

8
3

9
1
0
2

0
2
0
2

1
2
0
2

2
2
0
2

3
2
0
2

EPRA EARNINGS PER SHARE (P)
Definition
EPRA earnings is a measure of operational 
performance and represents the net 
income generated from the Group’s 
underlying operational activities.

TOTAL ACCOUNTING RETURN (%)
Definition
Total Accounting Return is the aggregate 
of the change in EPRA NTA plus the 
dividends paid, as a percentage of the 
opening EPRA NTA.

EPRA VACANCY RATE (%)
Definition
Estimated rental value (ERV) of 
immediately available space divided 
by the ERV of the lettable portfolio.

Why this is important to CLS
This KPI gives relevant information 
to investors on the income generation 
of the Group’s underlying property 
investment business and an indication 
of the extent to which current dividend 
payments are supported by earnings.

Our target
We will seek to grow the earnings of 
the business alongside net asset value. 

Progress
EPRA earnings per share for 2023 
was 10.3 pence.

Why this is important to CLS
This KPI measures the change in 
EPRA NTA per share of the Company 
before the payment of dividends and 
so represents the value added to the 
Company in the year.

Our target
Our target Total Accounting Return 
is between 3% and 9%.

Progress
In 2023, the Total Accounting Return 
was -20.8%.

Why this is important to CLS
This KPI measures the potential rental 
income of unlet space and, therefore, 
the cash flow which the Company would 
seek to capture.

Our target
We target a vacancy rate of between 
3% and 5%; if the rate exceeds 5%, 
other than through recent acquisitions, 
we may be setting our rental aspirations 
too high in the current market; if it 
is below 3% we may be letting space 
too cheaply.

Progress
At 31 December 2023, the EPRA 
vacancy rate was 11.0%.

  More detail is provided in the Chief 
Financial Officer’s review on pages 
24 to 27 and in note 5.

   More detail is provided in the Chief 
Financial Officer’s review on pages 
24 to 27 and 161 to 165.

    More detail is provided in the 
Country business reviews on 
pages 10 to 15 and 161 to 165.

22

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORT  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
10th

11th

18th

23rd

23rd

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN – 
RELATIVE (%)
Definition
The annual movement in capital in 
purchasing a share in CLS, assuming 
dividends are reinvested in the shares 
when paid, compared to the TSR of the 
23 companies in the FTSE 350 Real 
Estate Super Sector Index.

Why this is important to CLS
This KPI measures the change in the 
wealth of a CLS shareholder over the 
year, against the change in the wealth 
of the shareholders of a peer group 
of companies.

Our target
Our target Total Shareholder Return 
(relative) is between the median 
and upper quartile.

Progress
The TSR was -31.7%, making CLS 
the 23rd ranked share of the FTSE 350 
Real Estate Super Sector Index of 
23 companies.

CLS’ share price performed below 
expectations in 2023 as property, 
particularly offices, is out of favour with 
investors and the lower liquidity of CLS’ 
shares given one major shareholder.

Other performance 
indicators

In addition to these key 
performance indicators, the 
Group also has a number of other 
performance indicators by 
which it measures its progress. 
These are regularly reviewed. 
Three are shown here but others 
are summarised on pages 2, 161 
to 164 and in note 5 and are 
discussed in this strategic report. 
Our environmental and social 
indicators (including health and 
safety) are discussed in the ESG 
section on pages 32 to 47.

6%

5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%

5.4%

3.6%

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

 Net initial yield

Weighted average cost of debt

NET INITIAL YIELD VS COST OF DEBT (%)
We seek to maintain a cost of debt at 
least 200 bps below the Group’s net 
initial yield. At 31 December 2023, 
the cost of debt of 3.61% was 175 bps 
below the net initial yield of 5.36%.

   More detail is provided in the 
Chief Financial Officer’s review 
on pages 24 to 27.

5
8

5
8

4
8

  CLS admin cost ratio
  EPRA cost ratio

2
7

0
7

9
1
0
2

0
2
0
2

1
2
0
2

2
2
0
2

3
2
0
2

GRESB (ESG) SCORE/100
Our main sustainability indicator is 
the Group’s GRESB rating as this is 
an industry standard measure and 
also due to the difficulty in drawing 
conclusions from carbon-related 
measures due to the variability in 
occupancy of our buildings during the 
pandemic. In 2023 we achieved a GRESB 
rating of 84 and four green stars.

   More detail is provided in the ESG 
section on pages 32 to 47. 

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

ADMINISTRATION COST RATIOS (%)
These measure the administration 
cost of running the core property 
business by reference to the 
net rental income that it generates, 
and provides a direct comparative 
to most of our peer group. We aim 
to maintain the CLS ratio between 
15% and 17%. The administration 
cost ratio for 2023 was 16.0%.

23

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION  
 
 
 
 
CFO review

Summary
Given valuation declines, EPRA net tangible assets 
(‘NTA’) per share fell by 23.2% to 253.0 pence 
(2022: 329.6 pence) and basic net assets per share 
by 23.9% to 233.8 pence (2022: 307.3 pence). EPRA 
earnings per share were 10.3 pence (2022: 11.6 
pence) whilst the loss after tax of £249.8 million 
(2022: £81.9 million loss) generated basic earnings 
per share of -62.9 pence (2022: -20.2 pence). EPRA 
EPS provided 1.30x cover of the full year dividend 
of 7.95 pence per share.

CLS uses a number of Alternative Performance 
Measures (‘APMs’) alongside statutory figures. We 
believe that these assist in providing stakeholders 
with additional useful information on the underlying 
trends, performance and position of the Group. 
Note 5 and our Supplementary disclosures give 
a full description and reconciliation of our APMs.

Income statement
Net rental income in 2023 of £113.0 million, 
as set out in graph A, was up 4.8% from 2022 
(£107.8 million). The increase arose mainly from 
three areas: rental indexation increases of 
£2.8 million as the majority of our properties 
have index-linked rent; another record year for our 
student and hotel operations, up £1.2 million; and 
the full-year impact of two previous acquisitions 
in Germany of £2.3 million. Disposals reduced 
rental income by £2.0 million and the movement 
of properties into refurbishments and net lease 
expires lowered rental income by £0.5 million and 
£0.1 million respectively. Higher vacancy, mainly 
in the UK, resulted in higher net service charge 
expenses of £1.0 million. Dilapidation payments on 
lease expiries were £1.1 million higher and other, 
including FX, increased rents by £1.4 million.

CLS’ tenant relationships remain strong and 
the quality and diversity of our tenant base has 
continued to be reflected in our rent collection, 
and, as in previous years, we collected over 99% 
of rent. Rent collection for the first quarter of 2024 
is over 97% as is customary at this point in time.

Graph A: Net rental income £m

107.8

2.8

1.2

2.3

(2.0)

(0.5)

(0.1)

(1.0)

2.5

113.0

l
a
t
n
e
r

t
e
N

2
2
0
2
e
m
o
c
n

i

n
o
i
t
a
x
e
d
n

I

l
e
t
o
H
&

t
n
e
d
u
t
S

s
n
o
i
t
i
s
u
q
c
A

i

s
l
a
s
o
p
s
D

i

s
t
n
e
m
h
s
b
r
u
f
e
R

i

s
e
i
r
i
p
x
e

e
s
a
e
l

t
e
N

e
g
r
a
h
c

e
c
i
v
r
e
s

t
e
N

s
n
o
i
t
a
d
p
a
l
i

i

d

i

g
n
d
u
l
c
n

i

r
e
h
t
O

l
a
t
n
e
r

t
e
N

3
2
0
2
e
m
o
c
n

i

24

Overall administration and property expenses 
increased by £1.9 million to £33.8 million 
(2022: £31.9 million) primarily as a result of 
higher personnel and other administrative costs 
given inflationary increases. The proportion of 
index-linked rent remained steady at 55.2% 
(2022: 55.5%) of the total contracted rent of the 
portfolio. This high level of indexation continues 
to be a significant benefit in a time of higher 
inflation and interest rates.

Due to the higher level of costs, CLS’ administration 
cost ratio increased to 16.0% (2022: 14.4%) 
whereas our EPRA cost ratio reduced to 25.1% 
(2022: 25.8%) as certain vacancy costs are 
excluded from this measure. 

Given market weakness from higher interest rates 
and economic uncertainty, the valuation of CLS’ 
properties fell, although the reduction was lower 
than wider market movements. The reduction in 
the value of investment properties, excluding 
lease incentive movements, was £302.7 million 
(2022: £136.5 million fall) with falls in the UK 
of 16.7%, Germany 9.1% and France 9.1% in 
local currencies.

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Four properties were sold in 2023 for an 
aggregate consideration of £15.6 million. This 
was 15.2% above the pre-sale book value which, 
after costs, resulted in a profit on sale of 
properties before tax of £1.4 million 
(2022: £0.5 million). In addition, a further property 
unconditionally exchanged for £9.8 million, 2.8% 
above the pre-sale book value. Since the year-end, 
we have had strong expressions of interest on two 
sales for over £70.0 million at a small discount to 
valuations. Operating loss for the year was 
£223.4 million (2022: loss £63.9 million).

Finance income of £1.6 million (2022: £1.3 million 
excluding unrealised gains on derivative financial 
instruments of £8.8 million) increased given 
higher interest rates on cash deposits. Derivative 
financial instruments fell in value by £4.2 million 
(2022: £8.8 million gain) as they are now close to 
maturity. Finance costs, excluding the movement 
on derivative financial instruments, increased 
to £37.1 million (2022: £26.8 million) as a result 
of higher interest costs on floating rate, and 
recently refinanced, loans given wider market 
interest rate increases.

Approximately 51% of the Group’s sales are 
conducted in the reporting currency of Sterling 
and 49% in Euros. Whilst the year-end Sterling 
rate against the Euro strengthened by 2.1%, the 
average Sterling rate weakened by 2.0% resulting 
in a similar level of foreign exchange losses of 
£0.3 million in the income statement compared 
to last year (2022: £0.3 million).

Exchange rates to the £

At 31 December 2021
2022 average rate
At 31 December 2022
2023 average rate
At 31 December 2023

EUR

1.1893
1.1732
1.1295
1.1500
1.1535

The effective tax rate of 5.2% (2022: 0.0%) was 
below the weighted average rate of the countries 
in which we operate principally as a result of the 
conversion of CLS’ UK operations to a REIT at the 
start of 2022 and thus minimal tax is now paid in 
the UK.

 In 2023 CLS 
delivered solid 
results with lower 
valuation falls 
relative to the 
market and we 
have made 
significant 
progress with 
the planned 
refinancing 
activity for 2024.

Overall, as set out in graph C, EPRA earnings 
were lower than last year at £40.9 million 
(2022: £47.0 million) and generated EPRA earnings 
per share of 10.3 pence (2022: 11.6 pence). The 
decrease of 1.3 pence in EPRA EPS was primarily 
due to the increase in net rental income of 1.3p being 
more than offset by the increase in finance expense 
of 2.5p and inflationary cost increases of 0.4p.

EPRA net tangible assets and gearing.
At 31 December 2023, EPRA net tangible assets 
per share were 253.0 pence (2022: 329.6 pence), 
a fall of 23.2%, or 76.6 pence per share. As set 
out in graph B, the main reasons for the decrease 
were: property valuation decreases of 12.5% or 
75.6 pence per share; dividends of 7.95 pence 
per share paid in the year and foreign exchange 
declines on our European business of 3.6 pence 
per share; partly offset by EPRA earnings per 
share of 10.3 pence per share and other 
movements of 0.3 pence per share.

Balance sheet loan-to-value (net debt to property 
assets) at 31 December 2023 increased to 48.5% 
(2022: 42.2%) which was as a result of property 
valuation reductions with net debt little changed. 
The value of properties not secured against debt 
decreased to £74.1 million (2022: £105.1 million). 
In 2024, CLS is intending to be a net disposer of 
property to reduce LTV below 45% in the short-
term and 40% in the medium-term.

Graph B: EPRA NTA movement pence per share

329.6

(8.0)

10.3

(75.6)

0.3

(3.6)

253.0

2
2
0
2

c
e
D
1
3
t
A

s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D

S
P
E
A
R
P
E

y
t
r
e
p
o
r
P

n
o
i
t
a
u
l
a
V

r
e
h
t
O

X
F

3
2
0
2

c
e
D
1
3
t
A

Graph C: EPRA EPS movement pence per share

11.6

0.2

11.8

1.3

(0.4)

(2.5)

0.1

10.3

2
2
0
2
c
e
D
1
3

k
c
a
b
y
u
b

e
r
a
h
s

f
o
t
c
e
ff
E

a
m
r
o
f
o
r
p

2
2
0
2
c
e
D
1
3

e
m
o
c
n

i

l
a
t
e
r

t
e
N

s
e
s
n
e
p
x
E

s
t
s
o
c
e
c
n
a
n
F

i

x
a
T

3
2
0
2
c
e
D
1
3

25

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CFO review continued

Cash flow and net debt
As at 31 December 2023, the Group’s cash balance 
was £70.6 million (2022: £113.9 million) as set out 
in graph D. Net cash flow from operating activities, 
after payment of £37.3 million for financing costs 
and tax, generated £45.9 million, an increase of 
£2.9 million from 2022. From this net cash flow, 
£31.6 million was distributed as dividends with the 
remainder reinvested in the business to grow net 
tangible assets. Capital expenditure of £46.4 million 
was partly funded by proceeds after tax from 
property disposals of £15.2 million. In addition, 
there was a net repayment of loans of 
£24.6 million. The net result of property and 
financing transactions, being the investment 
of £43.3 million in our property portfolio.

Gross debt decreased by £35.3 million to 
£1,070.6 million (2022: £1,105.9 million) due to: 
the net repayment of loans of £24.6 million; the 
decrease of £12.2 million due to the strengthening 
of Sterling against the Euro; and the amortisation 
of loan issue costs of £1.5 million. In the year, 
£330.6 million (£329.5 million net of capitalised 
fees) of new or replacement loans were taken 
out, loans of £336.2 million were repaid and 
£17.9 million of contractual periodic or partial 
repayments were made. Year-end net debt rose 
slightly to £1,000 million (2022: £992.1 million). 
At the year end, CLS’ additional facilities remained 
unchanged comprising two undrawn revolving 
credit facilities totalling £50.0 million, both of 
which are committed. After the year-end, a new 
£10 million overdraft was agreed.

The weighted average cost of debt at 31 December 
2023 was 3.61%, 92 basis points (‘bps’) higher than 
12 months earlier. The movement was as a result 
of: an increase in the reference rates on floating 
rate loans (47 bps increase); new higher cost debt 
drawn for various refinancings completed (46 bps 
increase); and the weakening of the Euro against 
the pound (1 bps reduction). In 2023, interest cover 
at 2.2 times (2022: 3.0 times) gave comfortable 
covenant headroom.

 The focus for 
2024 is on sales 
and refinancing 
to lower LTV and 
keep the balance 
sheet strong 

PORTFOLIO VALUE BY 
COUNTRY £M

12%

43%

  UK 
  Germany 
  France 

45%

£920m
£886m
£257m

+6.9%

SECURED RENT ABOVE 
ERV FOR NEW LEASES

Financing strategy and covenants
In 2023, we refinanced the remaining expiring 
loans which had not already been refinanced in 
2022. We also made significant progress with 
the refinancing activity for 2024 such that of the 
£350.0 million expiring in 2024 at the start of 
2023, £178.2 million was refinanced in 2023. 
Subsequent to the year-end, two of those loans 
for £82.5 million have been extended until 2025. 
As a consequence, only £98.3 million across six 
loans in Germany and France with an LTV of 45% 
remain to be refinanced in 2024.

The Group’s strategic financing priorities remain 
to keep the cost of debt low whilst: keeping an 
appropriate LTV; maintaining a high proportion 
of fixed debt; increasing the amount of green 
loans; and seeking to match the Group’s weighted 
average debt maturity against the Group’s WAULT. 
At a tactical level, the priorities for this year are 
to complete the remaining refinancings for 2024 
and advance as much of the 2025 refinancing 
activity as practical.

As noted, CLS’ objective remains to keep a high 
proportion of fixed rate debt. However, in 2023 
just as in 2022 more floating rate loans and 
extensions than usual were executed given that: 
some properties are to be sold and thus wanting 
to avoid break costs; the letting profile for some 
properties needs to be improved in advance of 
securing a longer-term fixed rate loan; and a 
belief that interest rates were peaking and 
that lower rates could be secured in the future 
once the floating rate loan expired.

Graph D: Movement in liquid resources £m

Graph E: Cost of debt %

(37.3)

113.9

83.2

(31.6)

15.2

(24.6)

(0.8)

(46.4)

(1.0)

70.6

2.42

2.28

2.22

2.69

3.61

3
2
0
2
n
a
J
1
t
A

m
o
r
f
h
s
a
C

s
n
o
i
t
a
r
e
p
O

x
a
t
/
t
s
e
r
e
t
n

I

i

d
a
p
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D

f
o
e
l
a
S

s
e
i
t
r
e
p
o
r
P

n
a
o
l

t
e
N

n
w
o
d
w
a
r
d

E
P
P
f
o

s
n
o
i
t
i
s
u
q
A

i

x
e
p
a
C

r
e
h
t
O

3
2
0
2
c
e
D
1
3
t
A

9
1
0
2

0
2
0
2

1
2
0
2

2
2
0
2

3
2
0
2

26

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
99%

RENT COLLECTION

In 2023, the Group refinanced or extended 11 loans 
to a value of £330.6 million for a weighted average 
duration of 3.0 years and at a weighted average 
all-in rate of 5.27%, and of these £196.7 million 
were fixed at a weighted average all-in rate of 
4.76%. Consequently, at 31 December 2023, 75.9% 
of the Group’s borrowings were at fixed rates or 
subject to interest rate swaps, 3.8% were subject 
to caps which had been hit and 20.3% of loans 
were unhedged. The fixed rate debt had a weighted 
average maturity of 3.9 years and the floating rate 
2.2 years. The overall weighted average unexpired 
term of the Group’s debt was 3.5 years (2022: 3.8 
years). The Group’s debt maturity at the start and 
end of 2023 is set out in graph F.

The Group’s financial derivatives, predominantly 
interest rate swaps, are marked to market at 
each balance sheet date. At 31 December 2023 
they represented a net asset of £4.3 million 
(2022: £8.5 million asset).

At 31 December 2023, the Group had 43 loans 
(33 SPVs, eight portfolios and two facilities) from 
24 lenders. The loans vary in terms of the number 
of covenants with the three main covenants being 
ratios relating to loan-to-value, interest cover and 
debt service cover. However, some loans only have 
one or two of these covenants, some have other 
covenants, and some have none. The loans also 
vary in terms of the level of these covenants and 
the headroom to these covenants.

On average, across the 43 loans, CLS has between 
13% and 30% headroom for these three main 
covenants. In the event of an actual or forecast 
covenant breach, all of the loans have equity cure 
mechanisms to repair the breach which allow CLS 
to either repay part of the loan, substitute property 
or deposit cash for the period the loan is in breach, 
after which the cash can be released.

Graph F: Debt maturity £

400

300

200

100

0

3
2
0
2

4
2
0
2

5
2
0
2

6
2
0
2

7
2
0
2

8
2
0
2

9
2
0
2

0
3
0
2

1
3
0
2

2
3
0
2

3
3
0
2

GBP

EUR

Repaid/refinanced

New debt maturity

Distributions to shareholders  
and Total Accounting Return
The final dividend for 2022 of 5.35 pence per 
share (£21.3 million) was paid in May 2023 and 
in October 2023, CLS paid an interim dividend 
of 2.60 pence per share (£10.3 million).

Given ongoing uncertainty and challenging 
economic conditions, the proposed final dividend 
for 2023 is maintained at 5.35 pence per share 
(£21.3 million), the same level as 2022. This would 
result in a full year distribution of 7.95 pence per 
share (£31.6 million), covered 1.30 times by EPRA 
earnings per share. The Total Accounting Return, 
being the reduction in EPRA NTA plus the dividends 
paid in the year, was -20.8% (2022: -3.7%).

As a result of the conversion of our UK operations 
to a REIT in 2022, shareholders receive dividends 
comprising two elements. The dividends comprise 
a Property Income Distribution (‘PID’) from the UK 
REIT operations and a second element from CLS’ 
remaining operations. For the 2023 interim dividend 
of 2.60 pence per share, the PID was 1.70 pence 
per share and for the proposed final dividend of 
5.35 pence per share, the PID will be 1.50 pence 
per share giving a full year dividend of 7.95 pence 
per share of which 3.20 pence per share is the PID. 
The split between the PID and the dividend from 
our remaining operations is likely to fluctuate over 
time and will depend on the level of capital allowances 
and inter-company interest, amongst other things.

Andrew Kirkman
Chief Financial Officer

8 March 2024

27

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
Stakeholder engagement
Engaging with our stakeholders

 Our purpose 
is to transform 
office properties 
into sustainable, 
modern spaces 
that help  
businesses  
to grow. 

Our stakeholders
Why are they important?
We believe that engaging with our key stakeholders 
is fundamental to our ability to make well informed 
decisions which ultimately have a positive impact 
on the business, in the communities in which 
we invest and on the people with whom we do 
business. Positive engagement and collaboration 
with our stakeholders supports the implementation 
of our long-term strategy for growth.

We engage with our stakeholders through a variety 
of channels throughout the year. We have seen 
a positive impact on the decisions we have taken 
during the year as a result of the input from this 
stakeholder engagement.

KEY TO STRATEGY

WE ACQUIRE THE  
RIGHT PROPERTIES

WE SECURE  
THE RIGHT FINANCE

WE DELIVER VALUE THROUGH ACTIVE 
MANAGEMENT AND COST CONTROL

WE CONTINUALLY ASSESS WHETHER   
TO HOLD OR SELL PROPERTIES

WE REWARD SHAREHOLDERS,  
CUSTOMERS AND EMPLOYEES

Tenants

•  Improvements to 

communal areas to 
meet tenants’ needs

•  Input into tenants’ 
refurbishments
•  Implementation of 

sustainability initiatives 
and data platform

•  Tenant meetings
•  Tenant surveys
•  Pilot implementation 
of building specific 
“Tenant CLS App”

Suppliers

•  Working towards 

sustainable practices
•  Support fair tendering 

processes with feedback 
from suppliers

•  Quarterly review meetings 
with principal suppliers
•  Fair tendering process 
to ensure we work in 
partnership with suppliers

•  Programme of 

refurbishments and 
modern design fit out

•  Active asset, property and 
facilities management to 
deal with issues quickly
•  Enhancing communications 

through online portals

•  Obtain commitments from 
relevant suppliers in line 
with requirements from 
the living wage foundation
•  Ensure communication of 
Group objectives to enable 
collaborative approach

Communities

•  Improvements in 
public realms

•  Financial and in-kind 

support for local charities 
and other organisations

•  Implementing CSR 

programme

•  Supporting local 

organisations in the 
areas in which we invest

•  Working closely with 

communities and councils 
on refurbishment and 
development projects

•  Increase in funding for local 
charities and organisations

•  Adapted refurbishments/
redevelopments in light 
of feedback

•  Commitment to the Group’s 
policy of prompt payment 
of invoices

PRIORITIES IN 2023

•  Monitor staff engagement

•  Highlight quality and future 

•  Ongoing compliance with 

Employees

Investors

Financial institutions

•  Enhance CLS culture 

through wellbeing 

measures

readiness of portfolio

•  Address the disparity 

between share price 

and NTA

•  Long-term growth strategy

•  Impact of rising interest 

rates and inflation

loan covenants

•  Economic and market 

research and trends

•  Sustainability initiatives

HOW WE ENGAGED

•  Open door policy for 

•  Q&A session at 

•  Frequent meetings with 

analyst presentations 

all lenders

•  Regular meetings 

with investors

•  Presentations to and 

from institutions 

•  Operation of anonymous 

•  Feedback through 

•  Invitations to property tours

whistleblowing hotline

our key advisors

raising issues

•  Our Workforce 

Advisory Panel

•  Staff survey

OUTCOMES 

AND OPPORTUNITIES

•  More all staff meetings 

hosted by the CEO and 

•  Continued review of 

portfolio

SLT to maintain open lines 

•  Development of new 

of communication

•  CSR initiatives including 

group volunteering days 

and social events

•  Act upon outcomes 

of staff survey

website highlighting 

quality and future 

readiness of portfolio

•  Communication of 

Group strategy 

at individual meetings

•  Regular updates on 

portfolio changes

•  Ensuring best practice in 

compliance reporting

LINK TO BUSINESS   

MODEL AND STRATEGY

PRIORITIES IN 2023

HOW WE ENGAGED

OUTCOMES 
AND OPPORTUNITIES

LINK TO BUSINESS   
MODEL AND STRATEGY

28

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RIGHT:
Our Board members  
and property teams on  
a London property tour  
in November 2023

FAR RIGHT, TOP:
Our launch event of Artesian, 
Prescot Street, London, 
in November 2023

FAR RIGHT, BOTTOM:
Our launch event of The 
Coade, London, in June 2023

Tenants

•  Improvements to 

communal areas to 

meet tenants’ needs

•  Input into tenants’ 

refurbishments

•  Implementation of 

sustainability initiatives 

and data platform

•  Tenant meetings

•  Tenant surveys

•  Pilot implementation 

of building specific 

“Tenant CLS App”

Suppliers

•  Working towards 

sustainable practices

•  Support fair tendering 

processes with feedback 

from suppliers

Communities

•  Improvements in 

public realms

•  Financial and in-kind 

support for local charities 

and other organisations

•  Implementing CSR 

programme

•  Quarterly review meetings 

•  Supporting local 

with principal suppliers

•  Fair tendering process 

to ensure we work in 

organisations in the 

areas in which we invest

•  Working closely with 

partnership with suppliers

communities and councils 

on refurbishment and 

development projects

•  Programme of 

refurbishments and 

modern design fit out

•  Active asset, property and 

facilities management to 

deal with issues quickly

•  Obtain commitments from 

•  Increase in funding for local 

relevant suppliers in line 

with requirements from 

the living wage foundation

charities and organisations

•  Adapted refurbishments/

redevelopments in light 

•  Ensure communication of 

of feedback

Group objectives to enable 

•  Commitment to the Group’s 

•  Enhancing communications 

collaborative approach

policy of prompt payment 

through online portals

of invoices

OUTCOMES 

AND OPPORTUNITIES

LINK TO BUSINESS   

MODEL AND STRATEGY

PRIORITIES IN 2023

PRIORITIES IN 2023

Employees

Investors

Financial institutions

•  Monitor staff engagement
•  Enhance CLS culture 
through wellbeing 
measures

•  Highlight quality and future 

•  Ongoing compliance with 

readiness of portfolio
•  Address the disparity 
between share price 
and NTA

•  Long-term growth strategy
•  Impact of rising interest 

rates and inflation

loan covenants

•  Economic and market 
research and trends
•  Sustainability initiatives

HOW WE ENGAGED

HOW WE ENGAGED

•  Open door policy for 

•  Q&A session at 

•  Frequent meetings with 

raising issues
•  Our Workforce 
Advisory Panel

•  Operation of anonymous 
whistleblowing hotline

•  Staff survey

•  More all staff meetings 
hosted by the CEO and 
SLT to maintain open lines 
of communication

•  CSR initiatives including 
group volunteering days 
and social events
•  Act upon outcomes 

of staff survey

analyst presentations 

all lenders

•  Regular meetings 
with investors

•  Feedback through 
our key advisors

•  Continued review of 

portfolio

•  Development of new 
website highlighting 
quality and future 
readiness of portfolio

•  Presentations to and 
from institutions 

•  Invitations to property tours

•  Communication of 
Group strategy 
at individual meetings

•  Regular updates on 
portfolio changes

•  Ensuring best practice in 
compliance reporting

OUTCOMES 
AND OPPORTUNITIES

LINK TO BUSINESS   
MODEL AND STRATEGY

29

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Section 172 statement
Our approach to Section 172

Overview
The Board recognises the importance of the views 
of key stakeholders in its decision-making process 
and the execution of its strategy. It believes these 
to be crucial in maintaining a reputation for high 
standards of business conduct, and a Group that 
people want to work for and to do business with.
Our key stakeholders are set out on pages 28  
to 29 and illustrate how the Group has engaged 
and consulted with them. This approach is 
reflected in the Board’s decision-making  
process and examples of key decisions are  
set out in this section.

To support the recording and reporting of our 
section 172 obligations, Board papers are written 
so that they include a specific section detailing 
how the decision the Board is being asked to  
make would affect key stakeholders. In some 
circumstances it has led to decisions being 
amended to reduce the impact on certain 
stakeholder groups.

Meeting tenants and employees (including those 
below senior management level) through our 
property tours and Board presentations together  
with individual meetings with members of staff 
and external advisors on specific topics, provides 
an excellent platform to understand the views of 
our key stakeholder groups.

The Board also receives regular reports and 
feedback from meetings with investors and 
analysts, which provide further insight and 
discussion on the views of investors.

The Board undertook two property tours in Paris 
and London in 2023, where Board members were 
able to interact with employees below Board level 
and external advisors. They were able to see the 
locations of our buildings and understand the 
changing needs of tenants through different 
styles of fit out and design. They also met 
with a number of tenants which enabled 
them to receive first hand feedback.

30

RELEVANT DISCLOSURES

The likely consequences 
of any decision in the  
long term

The interests of the 
Company’s employees

The need to 
foster business 
relationships with 
suppliers, customers  
and others

RELEVANT DISCLOSURES

   page 30 
Company Purpose

   page 82  
Dividend Policy

   page 66  
Company Culture

   page 101 
Modern Slavery

   page 40  
Diversity and Inclusion

   pages 16-21  
Our Business Model

   pages 16-21  
Our Business Model

   Sustainability Report  
Employee Engagement

   pages 10-23  
Performance Review

   pages 10-23  
Performance Review

   Sustainability Report 
Our People

   page 32  
Sustainability

RELEVANT DISCLOSURES

The impact of the 
Company’s operations  
on the community and 
the environment

RELEVANT DISCLOSURES

   page 30  
Purpose and vision

   page 32  
Sustainability

   page 41  
TCFD

   pages 10-23 
Performance Review

   page 77 
Whistleblowing

The desirability of the 
Company maintaining  
a reputation for 
high standards 
of business conduct

   page 77 
Internal Controls

   page 30   
Purpose and vision

   page 32  
Sustainability

   page 77  
Whistleblowing

   Sustainability Report  
Responsible Payment 
Practices

   page 32  
Sustainability

   page 77 
Whistleblowing

The need to act fairly  
as between members  
of the Company

   page 64  
Annual General Meeting

   page 82  
Dividend Policy

   pages 28-29  
Stakeholder Engagement

   page 32  
Sustainability

Purpose-led considerations
Our purpose is to transform office 
properties into sustainable, modern 
spaces that help businesses to grow. 
Our investments are based on long-
term vision, continually modernising  
our portfolio into viable, future focused 
and sustainable properties.

Our vision is to be a leading office  
space specialist and a supportive, 
progressive and sustainably focused 
landlord. We achieve this by aligning 
our strategic vision to our tenants’ 

business ambition, reinforcing our 
diversification in our key markets and 
elevating the importance of sustainability 
across all aspects of our business.

Our four key values of: collaboration  
gets the job done; our tenants our focus; 
agility unlocks opportunity; and openness 
creates closeness, define our culture.

Together, these underpin the decisions 
made at every level across the Group.

PURPOSE

VISION

STRATEGY

CULTURE
See page 66

DECISION 
MAKING
See pages  
30-31 & 62-63

STAKEHOLDERS
See pages  
28-29

2030 GOALS
See page 32

RISKS
See pages 48-53

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTDividend Considerations
The Company’s progressive 
dividend policy supports the 
long term strategic plan and 
provides an attractive return 
to shareholders. 

Through the annual strategic 
plan, the Board monitors the 
Group’s cash flow position as a 
result of our desire to reinvest 
and grow the portfolio, and 
support our vision to be a 
leading office space specialist 
and a supportive, progressive 
and sustainability-focused 
commercial landlord.

Consideration of S172 
impacts by the Board 
in its decision making

INVESTORS (5)

The Board concluded that given the 
financial and operational performance 
of the Group against an uncertain 
macro-economic background, the 2023 
interim dividend was paid at the same 
level as the previous year. The Board 
reviewed the financial and operational 
performance of the Group during 2023 
and deemed it appropriate to pay a final 
dividend of 7.95 pence per share.

EMPLOYEES (4)

The Board considered how this would 
benefit and reward employees who own 
shares in CLS and also the impact it 
would have on the Share Incentive Plan. 
It concluded that there were significant 
benefits in rewarding employees through 
the performance of the Group.

Refinancing Agreements
Securing the right finance 
remains one of the key tenets 
of CLS’ business model and 
strategy and has delivered 
significant value to our 
stakeholders. As the property 
and financing markets have 
become more challenging post 
pandemic, we have prioritised 
building in greater flexibility 
to our financing agreements 
to mitigate against this. We 
refinanced and extended a 
number of our 2023 and 
2024 maturity loans this year 
and successfully executed 
committed Revolving Credit 
Facilities totalling £50m. The 
execution of our financing 
strategy in 2023 helped our 
weighted average debt maturity 
and liquidity position, which 
was a significant achievement 
in the current economic climate, 
giving us greater flexibility.

Consideration of S172 
impacts by the Board 
in its decision making

INVESTORS (1) (2)

The execution of our financing strategy 
materially reduced the Group’s liquidity 
and refinancing risks, enhancing our 
resilience in the current economic 
climate and giving our investors 
confidence that the company will 
continue to deliver on its strategy. 

FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS (1)

The amended financing agreements we 
entered into this year have strengthened 
our relationship with our lenders and 
ensured that the terms remain favourable 
and beneficial to all parties. Our new 
agreements we are party to have also 
allowed us to build relationships with 
lenders and ultimately expand our network 
for financing options in the future.

Monitoring 
Sustainability 
This year we have focused on 
the implementation of our 
strategy and monitoring ESG 
focus areas. Numerous projects 
were carried out throughout the 
year in collaboration with the 
regional property teams. It was 
estimated that these projects 
would save approximately 1,000 
tonnes CO2e per annum and 
would put us on track to achieve 
our energy and carbon reduction 
target of 4% per year in future 
years. We also conducted a 
review of our sustainability 
reporting and benchmarking 
frameworks, which concluded 
that CLS is aligned with best 
practice in this area. Given our 
level of reporting, we carried out 
a competitive tender process for 
a sustainability data platform to 
provide better data reporting 
and further automation of 
energy consumption data, 
resulting in more accurate, 
timely and reliable data that 
would also enable easier 
third-party verification. 

Consideration of S172 
impacts by the Board 
in its decision making

COMMUNITIES/ENVIRONMENT (1) 
(3) (6)

Oversight of our Social Value Framework 
and CSR initiatives ensures we deliver 
on our objectives for the communities 
in which we invest, promoting education, 
employment and our long-term strategic 
aims to become Net Zero by 2030.

TENANTS (1) (2)

Our Sustainability Strategy is designed 
to support our purpose which is to 
provide sustainable office space that 
helps businesses grow. The Sustainability 
Committee is able to monitor and ensure 
that we are on track to meet our targets 
which in turn deliver cost savings for 
tenants through various energy 
efficiency measures.

KEY – SECTION 
172 CRITERIA

1

The likely consequences 
of any decision in the 
long term

2

The need to foster the 
Company’s business 
relationships with 
suppliers, customers 
and others

3

The desirability of the 
Company maintaining 
a reputation for 
high standards of 
business conduct

4

The interests of the 
Company’s employees

5

The need to act fairly 
between shareholders

6

The impact of the 
Company’s operations 
on the community and 
the environment

31

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONESG overview 
Sustainability Strategy to 2030

A positive environmental impact
We will invest in our properties and 
collaborate with occupiers to sustainably 
manage natural resources, support local 
environments and build resilience to climate 
risks; delivering future-ready assets.

Net Zero Carbon Pathway 
   See page 37 for details.

l
a
t
n
e
m
n
o
r
i
v
n
E

l Creating shared value
a
i
c
o
S

We will create and share value with our 
stakeholders by engaging collaboratively with 
our occupiers, supporting local communities 
and partnering with our supply chain.

Social Value Framework

   See the Social section of the 2023 
Sustainability Report for details.

Strong governance and transparency will 
provide the basis for demonstrating our values, 
supporting people and working with our 
stakeholders to uphold high standards.

e Being a responsible business
c
n
a
n
r
e
v
o
G

   See the Governance section of the 2023 
Sustainability Report for details.

Monitoring and regulatory reporting 

Our Sustainability Strategy maps the journey 
CLS will take up to 2030, with the key targets and 
milestones set appropriately to reflect the position 
we are starting from against each material element. 
Our strategy is summarised below.

We believe that sustainable outcomes and 
shareholder returns are not a zero-sum game. 
Properly valuing and integrating sustainability 
risks and opportunities into our business strategy 
provides resilience to future disruption and 
unlocks potential future growth. 

Our strategy takes steps to prepare and adapt 
our business before regulation requires it, or 
the environment and our customers demand it. 
A more sustainable operating model reduces 
material risks to our reputation and balance sheet. 
Crucial to this is our commitment to being a net 
zero carbon business by 2030.

The fundamentals remain the same. We 
are working in line with globally recognised 
sustainability frameworks and targets to have 
a positive environmental impact, create shared 
value with our stakeholders and be a responsible 
business with strong governance and transparency. 
We continue to recognise the importance of addressing 
the environmental and social challenges that 
underlie a more sustainable future.

Explore deeper with our Sustainability Report 
This year we have decided to give sustainability 
prominence by creating a separate Sustainability 
Report published alongside our Annual Report. 
This fills the need of our stakeholders, including 
the numerous relevant ESG and sustainability 
reporting frameworks, for greater specialist data 
and information to provide necessary transparency. 

Our Sustainability Report provides a deep dive on 
the data and the work behind making CLS a more 
sustainable business and driving our ESG agenda. 

Sustainability remains an integral part of our 
overall strategy and we are getting on with 
implementation, showing clear results with 
significant energy savings, and progressing with 

2023 ESG 
HIGHLIGHTS 

SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC 
PANELS INSTALLED 

EQUIVALENT SOCIAL VALUE GENERATED  
(EXCLUDING SUPPLY CHAIN) 

NET ZERO 
CARBON PATHWAY  
PROJECTS COMPLETED

111 kWp

£261,949

73

PROPORTION OF TOTAL GROUP 
ELECTRICIT Y FROM RENEWABLE 
OR CARBON-FREE SOURCES 

>99%

EMPLOYEE VOLUNTEERING   
HOURS GIVEN TO COMMUNIT Y   
AND CHARITABLE ORGANISATIONS 

985 hours

REDUCTION IN LIKE-FOR-
LIKE SCOPE 1 AND 2 CO 2 
EMISSIONS FROM 2022

5%

32

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTESG overview continued
2023 in review

making our buildings more efficient and future-
ready. We have delivered on some of our 
commitments from our strategy, including 
becoming a Accredited Living Wage Employer. 

This year we completed the rollout of rooftop solar 
photovoltaics (PV) and electric vehicle (EV) charging 
in the UK and improved many of our EPC ratings to 
position our assets as the most sustainable offerings 
in some local markets.

Our work on delivering social value in the 
communities we operate in continued with a new 
focus on skills for young people and helping their 
readiness for work through a new partnership with 
the National Literacy Trust. 

Performance and Progress in 2023 Focus Areas 
We made good progress against the targets we set 
ourselves for sustainability focus areas this year: 
making progress or fully achieving 17 out of 18 
targets. Crucially, we are seeing energy reductions 
in line with our Net Zero Carbon (NZC) Pathway.

We were ahead of our energy reduction targets for 
the year. The impact of our projects is showing more 
broadly in energy reductions particularly as we were 
able to tune the operation of some major buildings. 
In France and Germany, there was some short term 
impact of energy efficiency measures. Importantly, 
we made progress in all three of our countries in 
different areas.

There has been a decrease in like-for-like landlord 
gas consumption of 7% across the Group. Similarly, 
electricity consumption in landlord spaces has 
decreased by around 8%, primarily resulting from 
energy efficiency projects. 

Unfortunately, our progress on energy reduction was 
offset by higher electricty and district heating carbon 
factors, caused by the impacts of the Ukraine war 
on European energy markets. As a result, our total 
Scope 1 and 2 GHG (Greenhouse Gas) emissions, 
using location-based carbon factors, reduced by 5% 
like-for-like, but slightly increased on an absolute 
basis, in 2023. This short-term carbon factor 
increase, meant we were above our NZC Pathway 
target, but in line with the target we set ourselves.

Scope 3 emissions were similar to last year 
primarily due to our continued spending on major 
construction and refurbishment projects. However, 
we recognise improvements are required to our 
Scope 3 calculation methodology to measure our 
emissions more accurately.

A further 73 energy projects were completed in 
2023 saving an estimated 741 tonnes CO2e (tCO2e). 
This was less than planned, due to some scaling 
back of capital expenditure. However, over 50% 
of our UK properties are now rated EPC A or B.

 Sustainability 

remains an 
integral part 
of our overall 
strategy and we 
are getting on with 
implementation, 
showing clear 
results with 
significant 
energy savings. 

For more  
detail, please  
visit our  
website to  
read our  
Sustainability  
Strategy  
and 2023  
Sustainability  
Report

Our rooftop PV and EV charger roll out came to 
an end in the UK with a final 111 kWp installed at 
5 sites and a further 20 EV chargers for tenants. 

Water consumption (in absolute terms) increased 
in line with more people returning to the office. 
Waste across our managed buildings decreased; 
this was due to monitoring work. On a like-for-like 
basis, there were reductions of -3% and -14% 
respectively, once acquisitions and disposals 
are removed. Our waste data calculation will 
be improved in the coming years.

We have maintained the social metrics upon which 
we report. Notably, board gender balance improved 
whilst employee gender balance and turnover 
remained steady. See the Social section of the 
separate Sustainability Report for more commentary.

CSR and social value remain important. We held 
numerous volunteering events this year, with 
nearly 1,000 hours of employee time given and 
nearly £86,000 of donations to charities in our 
focus areas.

We updated 30 BREEAM In-use ratings this year 
in our UK and French portfolios and achieved 
a minimum of ‘Good’ for these, showing our 
properties are on track to be fit for a sustainable 
future by meeting or exceeding anticipated future 
regulatory requirements. This approach is 
mirrored in major refurbishments and acquisitions 
as they occur, with The Coade and Artesian 
achieving BREEAM ‘Excellent’ for new build and 
refurbishment respectively.

Metrics and Framework Alignment
We align to EPRA sBPR (Sustainability Best 
Practices Reporting), SASB (Sustainability 
Accounting Standards Board) and GRESB 
(Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark) 
frameworks and report in accordance with the 
SBTi (Science Based Targets initiative) and 
CRREM (Carbon Risk Real Estate Monitor).

We are well placed to report in line with the coming 
standards from the ISSB (International Sustainability 
Standards Board) as well as the EU’s CSRD 
(Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive).

The table overleaf shows a summary of key metrics 
for 2023. The full tables, with splits by country, can 
be found in the rear of the separate Sustainability 
Report. These include all the disclosures for EPRA 
sBPR guidelines, geographical splits of the data and 
the table of SASB indicators. This year we have 
again provided our annual sustainability data as a 
downloadable file from our website (in CSV format 
for easy use).

33

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONESG overview continued
EPRA sBPR Summary data

GHG EMISSIONS
(GHG-Dir-Abs, GHG Indir-Abs, GHG-Dir-LfL, GHG-Indir-LfL)

Absolute

Like-for-Like

Scope 1 GHG emissions (Direct)
Gas
Gas oil
Diesel
Fugitive emissions
Scope 2 GHG emissions (Energy Indirect – Location-based)

Electricity (location-based)
Purchased Heat (location-based)
Scope 2 GHG Emissions (Energy Indirect – Market-based)
Electricity (market-based)
Purchased heat (market-based)

Scope 3 GHG Emissions (Other Indirect)2
Upstream emissions2
Downstream emissions2

Total Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions (Location-based)

Progress against NZC Pathway target

2023
tCO2e

4,8091
3,811
8
5
985
7,5151

4,034
3,481
8861
23
863

92,2461
61,181
31,064

12,3241

10,7696

2022
tCO2e

4,858
4,177
14
8
7933
7,354

4,080
3,274
1,103
2
1,102

86,784
61,488
25,296

12,212

–

Total Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions (Location-based)

104,565

98,996

Difference %

(1)%
(9)%
(40)%
(35)%
24%
2%

(1)%
6%
(20)%
1,433%
(22)%

6%
(1)%
23%

1%

14%1 9

6%

2023
tCO2e

4,590
3,654
8
5
512
6,516

3,752
2,763
653
11
642

–
–
–

2022
tCO2e

4,6595
3,9235
14
85
7143 5
6,6055

3,7295
2,8765
9335
0
9335

–
–
–

10,695

11,2645

–

–

–

–

Difference %

(2)%
(7)%
(42)%
(38)%
(28)%
(1)%

1%
(4)%
(30)%
 –
(31)%

–
–
–

(5)%

–

–

ENERGY CONSUMPTION
(Elec-Abs, DH&C-Abs, Fuels-Abs, Total Energy-Abs, Elec-LfL, DH&C-LfL, Fuels-LfL, Total Energy-LfL, IF-RE-130a.2, IF-RE-130a.3)

Electricity
Total purchased electricity for landlord spaces
Total purchased electricity sub-metered to occupiers
Total electricity generated through on-site PV

Total electricity generated through on-site CHP
Proportion of electricity obtained from renewable sources
Grid electricity consumed within head offices
District Heating and Cooling
Total landlord purchased district heating and cooling

Proportion of district heating and cooling obtained 
from renewable sources
Fuels
Total direct fuel consumption for landlord spaces
Total direct fuel consumption sub-metered to occupiers
Totals
Total Group energy consumption in landlord spaces
Total Group energy sub-metered to occupiers

Total energy consumed in head offices

INTENSITY METRICS
(Energy-Int, GHG-Int, Water-Int)

Absolute

Like-for-Like

2023
kWh

2022
kWh

Difference %

2023
kWh

2022
kWh

Difference %

18,586,145
7,463,012
976,633

385,952
99.5%
163,467

20,277,919
7,978,663
706,787

502,300
99.9%
190,675

(8)%
(7)%
38%

(23)%
(0.4)%
(14)%

17,000,755
7,303,085
962,714

18,391,0475
7,323,7475
689,9895

385,912
99.9%
163,467

502,300
99.9%
190,675

11,088,580

11,521,889

(4)%

8,897,912

10,181,1325

(8)%
(0.3)%
40%

(23)%
0%
(14)%

(13)%

11%

14%

(24)%

13%

16%5

(170)%

20,885,971
16,073

22,966,497
11,306

51,923,2821
7,479,085

55,975,391
7,989,969

163,467

190,675

(9)%
42%

(7)%
(6)%

(14)%

20,010,218
16,073

21,571,4285
11,306

47,257,552
7,319,158

51,335,8955
7,335,0525

163,467

190,675

(7)%
42%

(8)%
(0.2)%

(14)%

Total building energy intensity

103

117

(12)%

111

1285

(14)%

Absolute

Like-for-Like

2023

2022

Difference %

2023

2022

Difference %

kWh/m2/year

kWh/m2/year

kWh/m2/yr

kWh/m2/yr

Total Scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity

Total Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions intensity

Total building water intensity

34

kgCO2e/m2/yr

kgCO2e/m2/yr

kgCO2e/m2/yr

kgCO2e/m2/yr

211

182

22

182

(3)%

0%

22

–

265

–

m3/m2/yr

m3/m2/yr

m3/m2/yr

m3/m2/yr

0.37

0.33

12%

0.34

0.315

(17)%

–

7%

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTWATER AND WASTE
(Water-Abs, Water-Lfl, Waste-Abs, Waste-LfL, IF-RE-140a.2)

Absolute

Like-for-Like

2023
m3

2022
m3

Difference %

2023
m3

2022
m3

Difference %

Water
Total landlord-obtained water

Waste6

Total waste collected

Total non-hazardous waste

Total hazardous waste

Total waste recycled

Total waste incinerated with energy recovery

Proportion of waste recycled

Proportion of waste incinerated with energy recovery

212,9981

tonnes

181,752

tonnes

1,2511
1,2511
01
6191
6321

49%1

51%1

SOCIAL METRICS
(Diversity-Emp, Emp-Training, Emp-Dev, Emp-Turnover, H&S-Asset)

Gender Diversity
All employees – % of female employees

Board of Directors – % of female employees

Training
Average hours of training – all employees

Performance Appraisals
Percentage of all employees who received performance appraisals

Turnover
Total number of new employee hires

Total rate of employee turnover

Health and Safety
Percentage of assets with health and safety assessments

17%

(12)%

(12)%

(100)%

(18)%

(5)%

(4)%

4%

164,035

tonnes

1,084

1,084

0

543

541

50%

50%

2022

49%

33%

37

100%

203

25%3

100%

168,6555

(3)%

tonnes

1,2555

1,2555

0.1

6795

5765

54%

46%

(14)%

(14)%

(100)%

(20)%

(6)%

(4)%

4%

Difference %

(2)%

21%

243%

–

(15)%

-

–

1,422

1,422

0.1

755

667

53%

47%

2023

48%

44%

10

100%8

17

25%

100%

1  2023 figure Independently Assured by DNV.
2  CLS currently only reports absolute Scope 3 emissions, therefore no like-for-like breakdown has been provided.
3  Figure restated due to use of revised calculation method.
4  Figure restated due to replacement of estimated data or availability of new data.
5  Figure restated with revised set of buildings aligned with EPRA sBPR guidelines.
6  2023 NZC Pathway target total Scope 1 & 2 emissions (absolute) (not including new buildings in 2023).
7  This figure was likely under-reported due to new introduction of LEARN system, tracking employee training.
8  Excluding employees on maternity leave and fixed term contractors who are not subject to annual appraisals.
9  Percentage difference between NZC Pathway target and actual Scope 1 and 2 emissions.

Regulated Reporting and Methodology
The disclosures included in this ESG section cover 
the following reporting requirements that we are 
subject to as a UK publicly listed company:

•  Greenhouse gas (‘GHG’) reporting requirements 
defined within the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic 
Report and Directors’ Report) Regulations 2013 

•  Energy reporting requirements under the 
Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting 
(‘SECR’) requirements in the Companies 
(Directors’ Report) and Limited Liability 
Partnerships (Energy and Carbon Report) 
Regulations 2018

•  Climate-related financial disclosures consistent 

with recommendations from the Financial 
Stability Board’s Task Force for Climate-Related 
Financial Disclosures (TCFD); as required under 
the Companies (Strategic Report) (Climate-
related Financial Disclosure) Regulations 2022

The scope, boundary and methodology adopted 
for the calculation of the Scopes 1, 2 and 3 GHG 
emissions, SECR metrics, and other environmental 
and social indicators are set out in the Sustainability 
Metrics: Scope, Boundaries & Methodology section in 
the back of our detailed Sustainability Report. 

Independent Assurance
For the fourth consecutive year we engaged DNV, 
an independent expert in assurance and risk 
management, to undertake limited independent 
assurance. The assurance scope covers water, 
waste, energy and Scope 1, 2 and selected Scope 3 
greenhouse gas emissions, EPRA sBPR metrics 
as well as progress on our NZC Pathway.

The specific metrics that have been subject to 
assurance are identified in the summary data table. 

A copy of DNV’s 
Assurance 
Statement can 
be found on 
our website

35

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONWe will also still continue work on improvements 
in other environmental areas like biodiversity and 
waste alongside our continuing programme of 
green building certifications using BREEAM In-use.

On social value, our goal is to focus our work 
better, broaden our measurement and continue to 
grow our social value particularly around helping 
young people with skills. 

We will also focus more heavily on compliance as 
we seek to address the incoming EU Corporate 
Sustainability Reporting Directive and French 
Décret Tertiaire regulations.

ESG overview continued
ESG priorities for 2024 

In the year ahead our key priority is to continue 
building on our work to deliver energy and carbon 
reductions and again be in line with or ahead of 
the reductions planned in our NZC Pathway. This 
includes a focus on energy optimisation of 
buildings, further roll out of energy efficiency 
measures and ensuring our metering systems 
are robust and automated as much as possible. 

A bigger focus on engagement with tenants 
and our supply chain, is key to improving 
Scope 3 GHG emissions (our largest segment 
of emissions), social value and other 
environmental metrics. 

With the implementation of a state-of-the-art 
online data platform we also want to better 
share insights and reporting with our occupiers 
and stakeholders.

Focus Areas
•  Reduce carbon emissions and energy use in line 
with the NZC Pathway model (3% like-for-like) 

•  Ensure the business is working towards 

compliance with key future regulations (i.e. 
MEES, Decret Tertiare, Decret BACS, ISSB 
standards / TCFD and CSRD / EU taxonomy) 
and better measure progress

•  Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of 
sustainability reporting by rolling out a new 
sustainability data platform and reviewing 
utilities metering

•  Build CLS’ reputation externally on  

sustainability and ensure EPRA award 
and GRESB rating are maintained

•  Increase engagement with our tenants and 
supply chain, including data collection and 
reporting, to improve sustainability KPIs 
(e.g. Scope 3 GHG emissions, energy, waste, 
water and social value) 

•  Implement key actions to improve compliance 

with prompt payment code

•  Further grow our social value focussing 

on measures under ‘Improved employability 
of young people’ outcome

36

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTESG overview continued
Spotlight on Net Zero Carbon Progress

Our Net Zero Carbon Pathway is built from 
asset-level energy audits creating a robust 
technical evidence base of the energy and carbon 
saving opportunities and costs for each property. 
These have been aggregated into a Group-wide 
model to calibrate our targets, strategy and capital 
expenditure plans. In addition, they have been 
incorporated into individual asset management 
plans to enable strategic decisions about the 
refurbishment, sale or full redevelopment of 
assets to be made. 

 Our Net Zero 
Carbon Pathway 
includes a 65% 
reduction in Scope 
1 and 2 GHG 
emissions and a 
27% reduction in 
Scope 3 emissions 
by 2030. 

Where refurbishment is viable, the projects 
highlighted in the energy audit are incorporated into 
Net Zero Carbon Asset Management Plans for each 
building to ensure the optimal timing and allocation of 
capital over the course of the pathway to achieve our 
carbon reduction targets. These plans have resulted in 
a timeline of carbon reduction through to 2030 which 
will be constantly updated as expenditure is incurred 
at each asset. These plans are reviewed and improved 
each year to incorporate technology improvements as 
well as any acquisitions or disposals. 

Net Zero Carbon Pathway to 2030 Summary

Diagram to explain better

Adjusted
baseline

Business
as usual

Electricity de
carbonisation

Energy
efficiency &
F-Gas phase
down

Maximise
onsite solar
energy

Upstream &
downstream
measures

Carbon
offsets

We have included the full portfolio of buildings 
in our NZC Pathway and report on progress against 
our targets, projects completed and delivery costs. 
The pathway includes a 65% reduction (giving a 
buffer on our 42% commitment) in Scope 1 and 2 
GHG emissions and a 27% reduction in Scope 3 
emissions by 2030 against a 2020 baseline. The 
plans are aligned to meet or exceed our SBTi 
target (42% reduction required) as well as the 
CRREM pathways for 2030.

Residual carbon emissions in 2030 will be 
addressed with appropriate and robust carbon 
offsets. We are continuing to monitor options for 
offsets and will provide more details once the 
regulatory environment is more certain.

This year we have been working to verify that our 
NZC plans for each building in the UK and France 
align with planned regulatory changes (MEES in the 
UK and Decret Tertiare in France). Initial results are 
positive showing measures and costs are aligned, 
but work on this will continue next year.

Energy Efficiency and Carbon Reduction Projects
During 2023, we continued to deliver a variety of 
projects to improve energy efficiency and reduce 
energy costs in our buildings in the UK, Germany 
and France.

We completed 73 carbon reduction projects 
from the NZC Pathway at a cost of £4.8 million. 
The projects save an estimated 741 tCO2e 
annually; an increase of 21% over 2022. Similar 
to 2022, they included: 

•  Building refurbishment with window 

replacement (e.g. 9 Prescot St in the UK);
•  Replacement of heating, ventilation and 
cooling plant and equipment with higher 
efficiency units;

•  Replacing old extractor fans and old motors 
in air handling units with speed-controlled 
EC equivalents;

•  Electrification of heating using heat pumps;
•  Improving ventilation fan controls in car 
parks and toilets (e.g. carbon monoxide 
and time controls);

•  Replacing old light fittings in common areas 

and tenant areas, including emergency lighting 
and external and carpark lighting with LED 
lighting and automatic lighting controls;
•  Upgrades to controls including introducing 

Building Management Systems (BMS) 
and trialling continuous artificial intelligence 
BMS optimisation; and

•  Installing roof-mounted solar PVs.

In addition, there were also simple 
operational changes:

•  BMS and control systems adjustments where 

they were inefficiently deviating from optimum 
settings; and

•  Further rollout of pioneering new air handler 
enzyme cleaning, piloted in 2022, to reduce 
pressure drops, improve heat transfer and 
consequently reduce fan and chiller / boiler 
energy use.

37

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONESG overview continued
Spotlight on Net Zero Carbon Progress

An example of a completed project is the 
refurbishment of The Artesian. Full HVAC, lighting 
and window replacements as well as a new BMS 
and 16 kWp PV installation, mean the fully electric 
building is estimated to achieve savings of 140 
tCO2e per year.

We continued to expand our coverage of Automatic 
Meter Reading (‘AMR’) technology across our utility 
supplies in 2023. 77% of our main utility meters in 
managed assets now have AMR and for water 
supplies these include added smart leak detection. 

Streamlined Energy and  
Carbon Reporting (SECR)
As a listed company, we are required to report 
to SECR regulations. The table below provides 
a summary of the required measurables (aligned 
to the EPRA sBPR performance measures on 
page 34). This, with the previous section on Energy 
Efficiency Projects, forms our disclosure. More 
detailed figures are provided in the Sustainability 
Report in the Extended Sustainability Metrics 
section along with calculation details in the 
Scope, Boundaries & Methodology section. 

SECR Measurables

Global Scope 1 & 2 GHG 
emissions 
(GHG-Indir-Abs-Scope 
1 & Scope 2) tCO2e

GHG Emissions 
intensity ratio (GHG-
Int) – Scope 1 & 2 
emissions per net 
lettable floor area  
kg CO2e/m2

Underlying global 
energy use  
(Total Energy-Abs) kWh

UK energy use  
(Total Energy-Abs) kWh

Offshore energy use 
(Total Energy-Abs) kWh

2023

12,324

2022

% 
Change

12,212

0.9%

21

22

(2.7)%

51,923,2821

55,975,391

(7.2)%

23,194,699

26,437,689

(12.3)%

28,728,583

29,537,702

(2.7)%

1  2023 figure Independently Assured by DNV
2  tCO2e

Scope 3 GHG Emissions Selected Categories
Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: New construction and other capital goods
Category 3: T&D and WTT losses
Category 5: Water and waste treatment
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting, including homeworking
Category 13: Sub-metered utilities, & occupier-controlled utilities
Total Scope 3 GHG Emissions Selected Categories

38

5

6

1

1.  SCOPE 1 GHG EMISSIONS2

2.  SCOPE 2 GHG EMISSIONS2

SCOPE 3 GHG EMISSIONS2
3.  DOWNSTREAM LEASED ASSETS
4.  PURCHASED GOODS  AND SERVICES
5.   NEW CONSTRUCTION & OTHER 

CAPITAL GOODS

6.   WASTE GENERATED IN OPERATIONS, 
WATER, EMPLOYEE COMMUTING INC. 
HOMEWORKING, BUSINESS TRAVEL, 
FUEL AND ENERGY RELATED 
ACTIVITIES

4,809 

7,515

31,064
5,706

53,937

1,536

2

3

4

TOTAL GROUP SCOPE 1, 2 
AND 3 GHG EMISSIONS 
2023 (TONNES CO 2e)

104,565

CLS GHG INTENSITY AGAINST
CRREM V2 PATHWAY

CLS NET ZERO 
CARBON TRAJECTORY

CRREM v2 GHG intensity
CLS GHG Intensity
Target GHG Intensity

Projections

Actual

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2023
tCO2e

5,7061
53,9371
1,1451
701
2531
681
31,0641
92,243

2022
tCO2e

6,264
53,639
1,261
79
180
64
25,296
86,783

Difference %

(9)%
1%
(9)%
(12)%
41%
10%
23%
6%

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORT 
ESG overview continued
Environmental Summary 

2023 Focus Areas and Performance

TARGET

PERFORMANCE

Reduction in carbon emissions and energy use in line 
with the NZC Pathway model (4% like-for-like) and 
completion of relevant planned NZC energy efficiency 
and PV projects

Reduce energy Intensity in top 15 energy consuming 
buildings by more than 5% compared to 2022

Maintain or improve EPC (or country equivalent) ratings 
including having plans to upgrade all D rated buildings 
in UK

Undertake pilot assessments on development and 
refurbishment embodied and whole life carbon for 
achieving net zero carbon buildings including carbon 
credit offset purchases

Increase smart meter rollout for all utilities  
to >80% coverage

Undertake waste education initiative at assets covering 
>80% waste generation

Release Biodiversity net gain and rewilding plan and 
commence implementation

Update portfolio to BREEAM In-use V6 and maintain 
or improve ratings with clear plans to reach “Very 
Good” or higher

Key Environmental Highlights 

PERCENTAGE OF 
SMART METERING 
ON MAIN UTILITIES

77%

PERCENTAGE OF UK 
PROPERTIES RATED 
EPC A OR B

53%

Achieved

Partially achieved

Not achieved

•  Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions reduced by 5% like-for-like, 
only exceeding the annual NZC Pathway target due to 
worsening electricity carbon factors 

•  Energy use reduced by 8% including district heating use 

down by 12%, and landlord electricity down by 8%

•  73 out of 118 planned NZC Pathway projects completed 

costing £4.8 million and saving an estimated 741 Tonnes 
of CO2e per year

•  Made significant gas and electricity reductions at most of 

our larger buildings 

•  Spring Mews had 51% gas savings from recommissioning 

the ground source heat pump system 

•  Electricity use reductions included 16% at Harman House, 

18% at Thamelink House and 14% at Hygeia

•  Over 50% of our UK properties now have EPCs of A or B
•  Some challenges with new EPC calculation method has 

meant one building was rerated as E. However, plans are 
in place for all EPC D / E rated buildings to reach EPC B

•  Embodied Carbon Assessments completed at The Coade 

and Artesian (Prescot Street) alongside operational 
carbon assessments

•   The results showed the need to focus on embodied carbon 

reduction of future developments

•  Smart metering established in 77% of main utilities 

including nearly all electricity and gas meters 

•  All German water meters include smart leak detection 

with further roll out for other regions in 2024

•  District heating utility meters unable to have smart 

meters fitted currently

•  Waste education days held at all poorer performing 

UK properties

•  Recycling average dropped to 49% and needs further 

work to improve

•  New biodiversity, rewilding and ecology requirements 

included in UK landscape maintenance contract

•  Biodiversity and rewilding initiatives based on baseline 

assessments deferred to 2024/25

•  BREEAM In-use ratings maintained and plans in place for 

all rerated buildings to achieve ‘Very Good’

•  Artesian (9 Prescot Street) and The Coade in London 

achieved BREEAM ‘Excellent‘ under the New Construction 
and Refurbishment and Fit-out schemes respectively

39

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONESG overview continued
Social & Governance Summary 

Achieved

Partially achieved

Not achieved

2023 Focus Areas and Performance

TARGET

PERFORMANCE

Improve occupier engagement and experience including 
launching online tenant portal, pilot refreshed handbooks 
and welcome packs with environmental requirements in 
the UK

Grow our social value focussing on measures under 
‘Improved employability of young people’ outcome

Improve social value measurement further by covering 
more measures from our framework in line with TOMs 
and create overall social value calculation

Deepen key charity and community partnerships aligned 
to Social Value Framework

Gain and maintain Living Wage Foundation accreditation

•  Online tenant portal pilot launched at pilot sites
•  Refreshed tenancy fitout sustainability requirements 

initiated as part of green lease review
•  Increased tenant data requests serviced

•  £261,949 Social Value generated (excluding supply chain) 
including 985 staff volunteering hours, up 37% from 2022

•  Nearly £5,000 increase in value generated for youth 

employability outcome 

•  We have adapted measures in framework adding a 

measure where we provide reduced rents for charities 
•  Delays in supply chain engagement impacted this focus 
area and meant we did not measure our supply chain

•  New partnership with the National Literacy Trust has 

increased hours spent on youth skills and employability

•  Two students from local school completed work 

experience as part of this

•  All CLS employees & relevant contractors compliant 

prior to October Living Wage increase

•  Living Wage Employer accreditation received

Commence implementation of new Diversity, Equity and 
Inclusion plan

•  Implemented some DE&I plan elements including cultural 

recognition days (more work required in 2024)

Improve compliance with prompt payment code 
focussing particularly on % SMEs paid within 30 days

Increase % of Group debt comprised of ESG-linked loans 
to above 21%

Provide 90% of employees with 4 hours or more of 
job-specific training in sustainability

Create more non-financial incentives (awards & 
recognition) to encourage employee action 
on sustainability 

•  Compliance with prompt payment target has not improved
•  A new plan has been established by the finance team to 

address deficiencies, particularly in the UK. This includes 
IT system improvements, employee training, new finance 
processes and additional internal reporting

•  Group debt proportion of ESG-linked loans maintained
•  Sustainability Committee decided to review this goal in 

2024. Changes in finance markets mean this goal may not 
help the business improve sustainability in the short-term

•  ‘Lunch and Learn’ format re-established with 5 sessions 

on different aspects of sustainability

•  Property team members trained in BREEAM In-use

•  Launched new ‘Sustainability Stars’ awards for 
employees and contractors to recognise their 
contributions to our goals 

Key Social & Governance Highlights 

EMPLOYEE VOLUNTEERING   
HOURS GIVEN

ACHIEVED LIVING WAGE 
EMPLOYER ACCREDITATION

EPRA SBPR GOLD 
AWARD ACHIEVED

985

EQUIVALENT SOCIAL 
VALUE GENERATED  
(EXCLUDING SUPPLY CHAIN)

£261,949

40

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORT 
ESG: Climate-related Financial Disclosure

We recognise that the impacts of climate change, 
such as higher average temperatures, alongside 
changes to technology, markets, policy, regulation 
and, consumer sentiment, on the pathway to a net 
zero carbon economy, create risks and opportunities 
that could have material impacts on the value of the 
company and our assets.

CLS has made climate-related financial disclosures 
as required under the Companies (Strategic Report) 
(Climate-related Financial Disclosure) Regulations 
2022. These are consistent with recommendations 
from the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on 
Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) which 
are now part of the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure 
Standards (i.e. IFRS S2) developed by the 
International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB).

This includes: showing how climate change 
considerations are integrated into our governance 
processes; the potential impacts on our strategy 
and financial planning; how they are incorporated in 
risk management; and the relevant climate-related 
metrics and targets that CLS uses to drive action.

The tables below summarise our responses to the 
recommended disclosures under the Governance 
and Risk Management pillars of the TCFD 
framework and signposts the location of additional 
detail within our separate comprehensive 
Sustainability Report published concurrently. We 
have documented the details of some disclosures 
elsewhere (e.g. the Sustainability Report) to meet 
the needs of our stakeholders to minimise the 
length of the annual report. Taken together, these 
reports represent full disclosure against all 
recommendations of TCFD.

Visit our Sustainability 
Report here

Governance

Reporting Requirements
(as per regulations) 

Description of 
the governance 
arrangements 
in relation to 
assessing and 
managing 
climate-related 
risks and  
opportunities

Additional Information / 
References 

   Governance 
Framework 
page 67

   Risk Management 
section page 48

   Governance 
Framework 
page 67

   Remuneration 
Report page 84

A)  
The Board’s 
oversight of 
climate-related 
risks and 
opportunities

B) 
Management’s 
role in 
assessing and 
managing 
climate-related 
risks and 
opportunities 

CLS Holdings Disclosure

The Board has clear oversight of climate-related matters and is 
responsible for overseeing our approach to all material climate-
related risks and opportunities. The Board receives regular 
briefings on such issues and through CLS’ governance framework, 
can effectively delegate to the appropriate sub-committees and 
individuals. Given the risks and opportunities arising from climate 
change impact various aspects of our operations, the Board’s 
sub-committee includes representation from department heads. 
This ensures company-wide management of climate-related risks 
and opportunities using a “top down, bottom up” approach.

The CEO maintains the overall responsibility for the management 
of climate-related risks and opportunities, supported by the COO 
and Head of Sustainability. The CLS Sustainability Committee, 
which comprises key department leads (including the COO, Head 
of Sustainability and regional property heads), forms a key part of 
the management structure. As part of the Committee’s quarterly 
meetings, the impacts of climate change on the business are 
reviewed. Performance against climate related KPIs (outlined in 
the KPIs and Targets section below) are assessed to determine if 
and what actions are required to manage risks and opportunities. 
Actions are assigned to the relevant department heads, ensuring 
robust management across all business operations. For further 
details on the division of responsibilities across the organisation 
and the process by which climate-related issues are communicated, 
including upwards to the Board, please see our Governance 
Framework. To embed a further level of accountability, we have 
linked climate-related performance measures into our Remuneration 
Policy for the Executive Directors’ bonuses. 

41

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONESG: Climate-related Financial Disclosure continued

Risk Management

Reporting Requirements
(as per regulations) 

Description 
of how CLS 
Holdings 
identifies, 
assesses, 
and manages 
climate-related 
risks and  
opportunities

A)  
Description of 
CLS Holdings’ 
processes for 
identifying and 
assessing 
climate-related 
risks

B)  
Description of 
CLS Holdings’ 
processes for 
managing 
climate-related 
risks

C)  
Description 
of how CLS 
Holdings’ 
processes for 
identifying, 
assessing and 
managing 
climate-related 
risks are 
integrated into 
CLS Holdings’ 
overall risk 
management

42

Additional Information / 
References 

    Sustainability Report 
- Sustainability Risk 
Register Summary 
2023 section

    Sustainability Report 
– Climate-related 
Risks & Opportunities 
section

   Sustainability Report 
– Climate-related 
Risks & Opportunities 
section

   Climate Resilience 
Plan 

   Risk Management 
section pages 48-53

   Sustainability Report  
 – Sustainability Risk 
Register Summary 
2023 section

   Risk Management 
section pages 51-53

CLS Holdings Disclosure

Climate-related transition risks and opportunities are identified and 
assessed by the CLS Sustainability team and documented in the 
Sustainability Risk Register. The Register is reviewed by the Sustainability 
Committee on at least an annual basis and, where necessary, updated to 
reflect the ever-changing regulatory landscape, global socio-economic 
conditions and stakeholder demands, amongst other issues. 

Physical risks are identified and assessed on both an asset and 
portfolio level using the Jupiter Intelligence ClimateScore Global 
platform. Using the latest climate science, we identify risks and assess 
the level of exposure of our buildings to a range of acute and chronic 
climate hazards, over different time horizons, against different climate 
scenarios. Using the platform, we also quantify the level of risk from a 
financial perspective, providing oversight of the cost of action versus 
inaction. Like transitional risks/opportunities, all material physical 
risks are summarised, as applicable, in the Sustainability Risk Register 
which is reviewed and updated annually. Both physical and transition 
risks and opportunities are reviewed by the Sustainability Committee 
in accordance with TCFD guidance and Companies (Strategic Report) 
(Climate-related Financial Disclosure) Regulations 2022. 

To align our assessment of CLS’ key areas of risk and opportunity 
associated with climate change to the EU Corporate Sustainability 
Reporting Directive (CSRD), we will undertake a double materiality 
assessment in 2024, using any variations in results to update the 
Sustainability Risk Register, if required.

Fundamentally, climate-related risks and opportunities are managed in 
accordance with CLS’ Group-wide approach to risk management. Once 
identified, physical and transitional risks and opportunities are managed 
using the mitigations and controls outlined within our Sustainability Report 
and Climate Resilience Plan. Day-to-day management is owned by the 
Sustainability team in conjunction with the Group’s Sustainability Committee, 
which meets on quarterly basis. The team has significant knowledge and 
experience of climate-related and sustainability matters. In addition, we 
utilise the services of expert third party consultants where necessary. 
Training and presentations are provided to the Board and management to 
maintain up-to-date industry knowledge. The Board has experience in 
advising both listed and non-listed organisations on their approach to ESG 
matters in the built environment and across corporate disciplines.

The Group risk management strategy involves the ongoing assessment 
and management of six principal risks, considered those that have the 
greatest impact on our business strategy. The principal risks act as a 
centralised risk repository involving an annual evaluation of risk 
profiles and an analysis of the impacts on the Group’s business model. 
It also provides the structure to assign the appropriate controls. 
Sustainability is represented within the six principal risks and 
considers climate-related transition and physical risks a “key risk” to 
the business. All transition and physical risks are included in the 
Sustainability Risk Register which is maintained by the Sustainability 
team and reviewed by the Sustainability Committee on at least an 
annual basis or when a material change in the risk landscape occurs. 
Climate-related risk profiles are reviewed and relevant controls are 
assigned based on the ongoing evaluation of the Sustainability Risk 
Register. Furthermore, climate risks, opportunities and any necessary 
responses are managed across the same time horizons used by the 
Group to establish any emerging risks (page 53) ensuring their 
inclusion in short, medium and long-term business planning.

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTPrincipal Risks & Opportunities 
This section sets out the principal physical and 
transitional climate-related risks and opportunities 
arising in connection with our operations and the 
scenarios, including timeframes, over which these 
risks and opportunities develop.

Whilst there has been no material change to our 
exposure from last year, this year, we have 
re-framed our analysis to better align with the 
recommendations of Companies (Strategic Report) 
(Climate-related Financial Disclosure) Regulations 
2022. As such, only the material risks and 
opportunities to the business are outlined below. 
Further details and risk analysis are presented 
in the Sustainability Report including commentary 
on the updates to the ClimateScore Global platform 
data analysis methodology.

We have assessed the risks and opportunities 
presented to the business using two possible climate 
change scenarios; a 1.8ºC global warming trajectory 
(aligned with Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) 1 
and Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 2.6) 
and a 4.4ºC trajectory (aligned with SSP 5 and RCP 
8.5). Risks and opportunities are also considered 
against three different timeframes: short (<1 year); 
medium (until 2030); and long-term (beyond 2030). 
The two climate change scenarios ensure we identify, 
assess and manage risks and opportunities across a 
full spectrum of global warming scenarios. The time 
frames against which we assess risks and 
opportunities have been selected to align with the 
Group’s overall approach to risk management (please 
see pages 48-53) which outline the time horizons the 
Group uses) and to best capture climate-related risks 
and opportunities given the nature of our business 
and how it operates.

Time Horizon

Our Approach

Short term  
(< 1 year)

Medium term  
(until 2030)

Long term  
(beyond 2030)

Our annual strategic budgeting process combined with the individual NZC Asset 
Management Plans (see page 37), ensures that the necessary resource and capital 
required to mitigate the impacts of climate change and maximise any opportunities, 
is identified and allocated to each property on a yearly basis.

We are acting now, until 2030, to meet the targets set out within our NZC Pathway. 
Our NZC Asset Management Plans ensure we respond to both transitional and 
physical climate-related risks whilst decarbonising our operations in line with our 
science-based target timeframe.

Our assets typically have a lifespan of over 50 years. The identification of long-term 
risks (i.e. beyond 2030) is thus critical for our business model, especially 
investment allocation and development decisions. Consideration of long-term risks 
and opportunities is fundamental in ensuring our portfolio remains resilient in the 
decades to come.

43

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONESG: Climate-related Financial Disclosure continued

Climate-related Physical Risks Summary Table 
We have used Jupiter Intelligence ClimateScore Global platform to perform analysis and prioritisation of climate-related physical 
risks associated with well-known hazards. These are summarised in the table below. More details of the analysis from the 
ClimateScore Global platform is provided in the risk tables in the Sustainability Report including hazard likelihood and impact 
ratings. In the review of risks and opportunities by the Sustainability Committee, it was agreed there are currently no material 
opportunities associated with physical climate change related to our current business model over and above providing high 
quality buildings with strong sustainability credentials which meet regulatory standards.

Scenario

Short term (< 1 year)

SSP 1 / RCP 2.6 
(approximately 1.8°C 
warming by 2100). A 
scenario in line with the 
United Nations Climate 
Change Agreement of 
2015. According to the 
IPCC, it requires that 
greenhouse gas emissions 
start declining 
immediately and reach 
zero by 2100. This relies 
on global implementation 
of stringent climate  
policies

Low physical risks as 
only a small proportion of 
our portfolio (4% by NLA) 
is exposed to highest 
aggregated physical risk 
(including extreme cold, 
extreme heat, flooding, 
windstorms and wildfire). 
The most significant risk 
to our portfolio is 
flooding. 4% of our 
portfolio (by NLA) is 
located in flood plains 
where a 1 in 100-year 
event would see flood 
depth exceed two metres.

SSP 5 / RCP 8.5 
(approximately 4.4°C 
warming by 2100). 
A ‘business as usual’ 
high-emissions scenario. 
This scenario is consistent 
with no major policy 
changes or industry 
moves to reduce 
emissions globally leading 
to high atmospheric 
GHG concentrations

Low physical risks 
as still only a small 
proportion of our 
portfolio remains 
exposed to highest 
aggregated physical risk. 
The most significant risk 
is still from flooding 
(11% of properties 
deemed at highest, high 
or moderate risk based 
on ClimateScore Global). 

Impacts 
Disruption at buildings 
leading to reactive 
maintenance adding 
to operating costs 
and possible tenant  
dissatisfaction. 

Medium term 
(until 2030)

Physical 
risks and 
impacts are 
consistent 
with the 
short term.

Long term (beyond 2030)

Slight increase 
in physical risks 
but no significant change 
to overall portfolio 
exposure. For example, 
slightly warmer 
summers are expected 
but these do not pose 
significant risk of 
heat stress.

Impacts 
Slightly increased 
disruption at buildings 
leading to increased 
reactive maintenance 
costs and possible 
tenant dissatisfaction. 

Impacts as above.

Physical 
risks and 
impacts are 
consistent 
with the 
short term.

Significant increase in 
physical risks across the 
portfolio from hotter, 
drier summers; warmer, 
wetter winters and more 
frequent severe weather 
events. Sea level rise and 
increases in river peak 
flows put additional 
strain on the flood 
defences which may 
cause flood defence 
failures across 
the regions

Impacts 
Increased disruption 
at buildings leading to 
significantly increased 
reactive maintenance 
costs and tenant  
dissatisfaction.

Significantly increased 
insurance premiums. 

Increased capital 
allocation for building 
retrofit / refurbishment 
projects to meet 
potentially higher 
insurance requirements / 
buildings standards.

44

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTClimate-related Transitional Risk & Opportunities Summary Table
Climate-related transitional risks were considered during the development of the NZC Pathway. These are reviewed at least 
annually by the Sustainability Committee to ensure that any material changes are captured. More detail is provided in the risk 
tables in the Sustainability Report including hazard likelihood and impact ratings. Note that we have blended the material 
opportunity of increased occupier demand for low-carbon buildings with the risk of failing to provide net zero aligned buildings, 
as it can be seen both ways and the resulting actions/mitigation is the same.

Impacts 
Capital allocation 
for building retrofit / 
refurbishment 
projects as per our 
NZC Pathway and 
Sustainability Strategy.

Medium term 
(until 2030)

Transitional 
risks and 
impacts 
remain 
consistent 
with the 
short term.

Scenario

Short term (< 1 year)

SSP 1 / RCP 2.6
(approximately 1.8°C 
warming by 2100). A 
scenario in line with the 
United Nations Climate 
Change Agreement of 
2015. According to the 
IPCC, it requires that 
greenhouse gas emissions 
start declining 
immediately and reach 
zero by 2100. This relies 
on global implementation 
of stringent climate  
policies 

Medium transitional 
risks associated with 
existing regulations, 
for example, MEES 
and Décret Tertiaire as 
well as local planning 
requirements favouring 
low embodied carbon 
development schemes. 
In addition, there is 
increasing occupier 
and investor demand 
for assets with high 
sustainability credentials.

Transitional risks 
remain consistent 
with SSP 1 scenario.

Impacts as above.

Transitional 
risks and 
impacts 
remain 
consistent 
with the 
short term.

SSP 5 / RCP 8.5
(approximately 4.4°C 
warming by 2100). 
A ‘business as usual’ 
high-emissions scenario. 
This scenario is consistent 
with no major policy 
changes or industry moves 
to reduce emissions 
globally leading to 
high atmospheric 
GHG concentrations

Long term (beyond 2030)

High transitional risks 
associated with:

Regulations 
including MEES and 
Décret Tertiaire; 

Carbon tax – potential for 
the built environment to be 
included in UK Emissions 
Trading Scheme;

Operational and embodied 
carbon obligations for 
development schemes; and

Continued increase in 
occupier and investor 
demand for ESG.

Significant increase 
in transitional risks 
like all other commercial 
landlords operating in 
Europe, as adaptation 
measures are adopted 
to cope with changes 
in climate and the 
associated physical risks.

Impacts 
Capital allocation 
for building retrofit / 
refurbishment 
projects as per our 
NZC Pathway and 
Sustainability Strategy.

Increased operating 
costs e.g. cost of energy.

Impacts 
Increased capital 
allocation for building 
retrofit / refurbishment 
projects outside of 
that captured in 
NZC Pathway and 
Sustainability Strategy.

Increased operating 
costs e.g. cost of energy.

Business Model & Strategy Resilience 
The tables below outline the financial and strategic impacts of transitional and physical climate-related risks on CLS’ operations 
and explains how our business strategy is designed to mitigate and respond to these impacts, ensuring our portfolio and business 
model remains resilient in the long-term. We only outline the impact of transitional risk under SSP 1 / RCP 2.6 as this climate 
scenario requires the greatest level of transition and already aligns with our financial and strategic planning.

Scenario 1 – SSP 1 / RCP 2.6

Summary risk

Transitional 

Financial impact potential

Strategy impact potential

Financial plan impact potential

The Group’s NZC Pathway is underpinned 
by individual property energy audits 
which identify energy and carbon saving 
opportunities. The investment allocated 
to deliver the audit findings amounts to 
an estimated £65 million over a 9-year 
period between 2021 and 2030. We have 
integrated the energy audits into individual 
Asset Management Plans to enable 
strategic decisions about the 
refurbishment, sale or full redevelopment 
of our assets to be made. 

Furthermore, we report against all relevant 
mandatory GHG, energy and ESG reporting 
frameworks as well as several voluntary 
disclosures (see page 33), ensuring we 
meet all current and future regulation.

Our Sustainability Strategy, NZC 
Pathway and Climate Resilience Plan 
align with our business model and 
overall strategy. Notably, our active 
asset management approach 
continuously upgrades our portfolio 
of buildings to meet energy and carbon 
targets and is manageable within 
current planned capital allocations.

Given this, our analysis suggests our 
business model and strategy remain 
resilient in the short to medium term 
to climate-related transition risks in 
all scenarios by following the actions 
and targets in our Sustainability 
Strategy, NZC Pathway and Climate 
Resilience Plan.

In the short term, annual budgets 
already factor in investment aligned 
with the NZC Pathway and 
Sustainability Strategy. In the longer 
term, our strategic budgets and 
investment programme includes the 
estimated £65 million from 2021 to 
2030 to prevent obsolescence (i.e. not 
meeting future climate standards) 
and creates a resilient portfolio. 
Relative to our peer group 
of commercial landlords with 
properties in UK, French & German 
cities, we see no major differences.

45

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONESG: Climate-related Financial Disclosure continued

Scenario 1 – SSP 1 / RCP 2.6 continued

Summary risk

Physical 

Financial impact potential

Strategy impact potential

Financial plan impact potential

As above, the capital allocated to deliver 
the targets set out in our NZC Pathway, 
Sustainability Strategy and Climate 
Resilience Plan will ensure the 
necessary adaptation measures and 
mitigating controls are implemented. 

Our properties are insured against 
all weather hazards and following 
discussions with our insurance brokers, 
there will be no material change to our 
insurance premiums in the medium term.

Our active asset management approach, 
in line with our Sustainability Strategy, 
NZC Pathway, Climate Resilience Plan 
and overall Group strategy, means our 
properties undergo a programme of 
upgrades and future proofing to address 
physical climate risks. This process is 
manageable within current planned 
capital allocations. As such, we are 
confident our business model will 
remain resilient in the long term.

As above, annual budgets factor 
in investment aligned with the NZC 
Pathway, Sustainability Strategy 
and Climate Resilience Plan meaning 
we expect no material impact on our 
future financial planning.

Scenario 2 – SSP 5 / RCP 8.5

Financial impact potential

Strategy impact potential

Financial plan impact potential

In the medium to long-term, whilst our 
Sustainability Strategy, NZC Pathway 
and Climate Resilience Plan still apply, 
we note that capital allocations and 
operating costs (e.g. insurance 
premiums) may exceed current planning 
to meet future standards. However, 
we fully expect this will be in line with 
our peer group of commercial landlords 
with properties in UK, French and 
German cities.

The investment allocated to deliver our 
NZC Pathway, Sustainability Strategy 
and Climate Resilience Plan will ensure 
comprehensive and robust mitigation 
measures and controls are implemented 
across our portfolio. Our analysis of the 
short, medium and long-term hazard 
levels associated with climate change 
across the UK, France and Germany (see 
Climate Related Risks & Opportunities 
section of the Sustainability Report), 
highlight some adaptation measures will 
be necessary but this will be covered by 
the capex we have already identified and 
allocated, in the medium-term.

Our analysis gives us confidence in 
the resilience of our strategy, as we 
are supporting the transition to a 
low-carbon world whilst managing 
the impact of climate-related risks 
to our portfolio. Although it does not 
undermine our overall model as a 
commercial landlord, we recognise our 
strategy and adaptation measures may 
need to evolve in the long term under 
a > 4ºC warming (i.e. SSP 5) scenario. 
This may involve measures including 
divestment of assets which are less 
resilient to extreme heat and rainfall 
(as part of a holistic asset assessment), 
or investment into additional building 
infrastructure to limit the impact of 
flooding, coastal surge and 
extreme heat. 

This scenario could also result in 
changes to our customers’ and supply 
chain partners’ businesses, including 
business failures, or supply chain 
disruption. Increased due diligence in 
supply chain selection may be required, 
particularly considering the sourcing of 
construction materials which may be 
processed or manufactured in countries 
where the effects of climate change are 
more extreme. We do not expect this to 
impact tenant demand for workspace. 

Summary risk

Physical

46

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTKPIs & Targets 
KPIs for tracking climate-related transition and physical 
risks are shown in tables below. More details on the targets 
and calculations are in the referenced documents. Some 
KPIs are independently assured as indicated in the table.

Note that most targets and KPIs used to manage climate-
related transitional risk are drawn from our Sustainability 
Strategy and NZC Pathway and targets for managing 
physical risks are taken from our Climate Resilience Plan. 

Interim focus areas and targets are established and 
reviewed year on year by the Sustainability Committee. 

As per the Scope, Boundaries & Methodology 2023 section 
of the Sustainability Report, GHG emissions are calculated 
in line with the GHG Protocol guidance. Further detail on the 
interlinkage between our KPIs and Targets and risks and 
opportunities can be found in the Sustainability Report.

Climate-related Transition Risk & Opportunities KPIs & Targets 

KPI

Scope 1 and 2  
emissions (tCO2e)

EPRA/SASB Reference

2023

GHG-Dir-Abs, 
GHG-Indir-Abs

12,3241

2022 

12,212

2021 

13,894

Total-Energy-Abs

51,923,2821

55,975,391 

59,194,444

27,575,210

29,465,669

30,692,654

99.5%

99.9%

On-site renewable energy 
generation (MWh)

Elec-Abs

977

707

Fuels-Abs

20,902,044

22,977,803 

25,909,886

Energy-Int

103

117 

134

Total group energy  
consumption (kWh)

Total electricity 
consumption (kWh)

Proportion of electricity 
sourced from renewable 
sources (%)

Elec-Abs

Elec-Abs

Total fuel consumed on 
site (kWh)

Building emissions 
intensity by floor area 
(kWh/m2/year)

Scope 3 emissions (tCO2e) 
and selected Scope 3 
categories split

GHG-Indir-Abs

92,243 
Selected Scope 3 
categories on P381

86,783 
Selected Scope 3 
categories in Table 3 in 
Sustainability Metrics 
Appendix Annual 
Report 2022

EPC (Energy  
Performance Certificate) 
split of UK portfolio 

Cert-Tot

53% EPC A or B 
47% EPC C or below

45% EPC A or B 
55% EPC C or below

1  KPI performance is independently assured in 2023.

Climate-related Physical Risk & Opportunities KPIs & Targets

92%

469

–

–

Targets & References

42% reduction in 
absolute Group Scope 
1 and 2 emissions by 
2030 (see NZC Pathway 
/ SBTi aligned target)

N/A

N/A

100%

N/A

N/A

85 kWh/m2/year 
(aligned with 1.5 ºC 
CRREM pathway)

Physical intensity 
reduction by 20% per 
m2 NLA (See NZC 
Pathway / SBTi aligned 
target / CRREM 
aligned target)

Fully MEES compliant 
in UK – expected to 
be minimum EPC C by 
2027, EPC B by 2030. 
Fully Décret Tertiare 
compliant in France

Number and % by value of 
assets located in areas 
exposed to high or highest 
risk of inland, coastal and 
flash flooding – current & 
2030 (SSP 5 Scenario)1 2

% Assets with measures 
installed to mitigate 
flooding (in highest 
risk areas)

% Total water withdrawn 
in regions with high or 
extremely high baseline 
water stress

% Assets with adaptation 
measures to mitigate  
overheating

N/A

2023: 7 
8% by value (2022)

2022: 9 (% by value 
not measured)

Less than 5% assets 
(by value) by 2035

2030 (SSP 5  
Scenario): 7

2030 (SSP 5  
Scenario): 9

N/A

0%

Not measured

100% by 2035

SASB IF-RE-140a.2

16%

16%

<10% by 2035

N/A

Not yet measured

Not yet measured

100%

1   As per ClimateScore Global definitions.
2  Methodology for calculation included in the Sustainability Report.

47

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONRisk management

Risk management is a 
critical component of 
the operation of our 
business, allowing us 
to take advantage of 
opportunities whilst 
ensuring that we do not 
expose the business to 
excessive risk thereby 
generating shareholder 
value over the long 
term in a sustainable 
and compliant manner.

OUR RISK MANAGEMENT  
FRAMEWORK

Top down
Oversight, 
identification, 
assessment and 
mitigation of risk 
at a Group level. 
Continuous review 
of strategy and our 
environment ensures 
that we respond in a 
timely manner to 
any changes in 
our principal and 
emerging risks.

Bottom up
Identification, 
assessment and 
mitigation of risk at 
business unit and 
functional level.

48

What we did in 2023

Our Priorities for 2024

•  Enhanced our internal control framework 

•  Finance remaining 2024 maturing debt and 

through documentation of key processes and 
controls across the Group.

•  Performed controls testing as per our plan and 
in readiness for the UK Government’s corporate 
governance reforms.

•  Closely monitored the Group’s cash position 

and cash flow, on at least a weekly basis, with 
particular focus on refinancings, sales and 
capital expenditure. The Group has a successful 
track record of cash management but its 
business model remains dependent on 
refinancings and sales as highlighted in the 
Going concern assessment on page 54.
•  Targeted capital expenditure to ensure 

properties remain appealing to tenants in 
terms of their amenities and sustainability 
credentials to mitigate identified property 
and sustainability risks.

•  Undertook a Group wide Staff Engagement and 
Enablement Survey completed by 88% of staff 
providing insight into the business.

•  Retained our Cyber Essentials plus ranking.
•  Achieved milestone targets on the Net Zero 

Carbon pathway.

•  Engaged external consultants who 

performed an in-depth analysis of the 
climate related resilience.

advance refinancings of 2025 loans.

•  Finalisation of CoreStream risk management 
system through refinement of risk registers, 
reassessment of material risks and 
enhancement of our internal controls 
framework (including ownership and testing).
•  Continue to deliver on our roadmap of readiness 
activities for the UK Government’s proposed 
corporate reforms.

•  Refinement of internal control ownership and 

responsibilities.

•  Implement relevant Grant Thornton findings.
•  Make improvements based on feedback from 

tenant surveys.

•  Ensure Cyber Essentials plus ranking retained.
•  Enhance our crisis response capabilities to reflect 
the dynamic nature of the global risk landscape.

•  Digitally enable employees and tenants, and 
continue to build digital literacy, awareness 
and capability.

•  Minimise financial risk in relation to securing 

future gas and electricity supply for the portfolio 
though adherence to risk limits with guidance 
from our external energy procurement partners.

•  Closely monitor and support the business 
through risks arising from the changing 
geopolitical environment.

The Board
•  Overall responsibility for reviewing and monitoring risk management and internal controls framework. 
•  Annual review and determination of risk appetite.
•  Annual assessment of principal and emerging risks.
•  Receives regular updates from the Audit Committee on risk management, internal controls and the long-term viability 

of the Group. 

•  Sets business wide policies and delegated authority limits.

Audit Committee
•  Key oversight and assurance function 

Executive Committee
•  Comprises the CEO and the CFO 

for risk management, internal 
controls and viability. 

•  Receives updates on risks and the 
control environment including the 
results of any internal control review 
procedures and other assessments 
undertaken in the period at each 
Audit Committee meeting. 
Invites senior managers to attend to 
discuss specific risk areas. These 
discussions are sometimes 
supplemented by external advisors 
where relevant.

• 

•  Engages with, and reviews findings 

of, the external auditors.
•  Reports to the Board on the 

together with other senior leaders 
as required.

•  Responsible for the day-to-day 
operational oversight of risk 
management. 

•  Major business-wide decisions such 
as property acquisitions, disposals, 
significant strategy changes and 
the wider changing geopolitical 
landscape are discussed. These 
decisions are assessed with 
reference to risk appetite.

•  Proposed decisions are reviewed by 
the Board before implementation 
subject to authorisation limits.

effectiveness of risk management 
and internal controls.

Controls
•  CoreStream utilised as the Group’s 

Policies
•  The Group has policies set by the 

Board that govern key risks across 
the business. These are regularly 
reviewed to ensure they are up 
to date and comply with laws 
and regulations. 

risk management system for 
recording key processes, controls, 
risks and ownership and regularly  
testing effectiveness of 
material controls.

Senior Leadership Team
•  Meets fortnightly and is comprised of the 
CEO, the CFO, the COO, regional business 
heads and the Group Financial Controller.

•  Reviews and monitors the Group’s 

principal and emerging risks taking into 
account the appetite for, and impact of, 
risk in all areas of the business. These 
are presented to the Audit Committee 
every six months for further discussion.
•  Senior managers regularly attend Audit 
Committee meetings to provide further 
information in relation to specific risk 
areas, supported by external advisors 
if appropriate.

Business Units
•  Risk management embedded in 
day-to-day operations including 
identifying, evaluating and reviewing 
within these units. 

•  Executes strategic actions in 
compliance with the Group’s 
objectives and policies.

•  Engages with the Executive Directors 
and senior management to identify 
risks and review risk processes and 
procedures relevant to these units.

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTRisk appetite

The Board reviews our risk appetite at least 
annually. The risk appetite of the Group is 
assessed with reference to changes both that 
have occurred, or trends that are beginning to 
emerge in the external environment, and changes 
in the principal risks and their mitigation. These 
will guide the actions we take in executing our 
strategy. Whilst our appetite for risk will vary over 
time, in general we maintain a balanced approach 
to risk. The Group uses five risk categories to 
allocate its risk appetite:

Very low: Avoid risk and uncertainty
Low: Keep risk as low as reasonably practical with 
very limited, if any, reward
Medium: Consider options and accept a mix of low 
and medium risk options with moderate rewards
High: Accept a mix of medium and high risk 
options with better rewards
Very high: Choose high risk options with potential 
for high returns

To decide upon risk categorisations, internally set, 
percentage movements in the balance sheet and 
income statement are taken into account. The 
Board has assessed its risk appetite for each of 
the Group’s principal risks as follows:

Principal risks

Property

Sustainability

2023
Risk appetite

2022
Risk appetite

High

High

No change

Medium

Medium

No change

Business interruption

Low

Low

No change

Financing

Medium

Medium

No change

Political & economic

Medium

Medium

No change

People

Medium

Medium

No change

On reviewing our risk appetite, the Board 
recognised that there are factors outside of the 
Group’s control, for example the market that 
influences their appetite in any one year.

Management of Risk 
throughout the Group

The Board has overall responsibility for risk 
management and has carried out a robust 
assessment of the principal risks faced by the 
Group thereby meeting its responsibilities in 
connection with risk management and internal 
control set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code.

Based on the size of its balance sheet and market 
capitalisation, CLS is a large business, but it is 
relatively small based on the number of people 
working directly in the business. Our internal 
control structures allow the Group to safeguard 
its assets, prevent and detect material fraud and 
errors, ensure accuracy and completeness of the 
accounting records used to produce reliable 
financial information while still allowing the 
flexibility to take advantage of opportunities to 
further the business strategies of the Group.

In 2021 the Group invested in CoreStream, an 
internal control and risk software package. Work 
continues to populate the system fully and embed 
an effective risk management structure within 
our operations. This will allow us to monitor and 
report the risks and their associated internal 
controls more effectively to the Audit Committee 
and the Board.

Risks are identified and assessed, and a risk 
owner is assigned. The risk owner is the person 
considered to be in the best position to prepare 
and implement mitigation plans. In addition, 
a control owner is assigned who can monitor 
and assess the effectiveness of the controls 
to address each principal risk. As part of our 
risk management procedures, the Executive 
Committee and Audit Committee receive updates 
regarding risk management activities to ensure 
that procedures are consistently applied across 
the Group and that they remain sufficiently robust, 
and to identify any weaknesses or enhancements.

Potential risks associated with loss of life or injury 
to members of the public, customers, contractors 
or employees arising from operational activities 
are continually monitored. Competency checks are 
undertaken for the consultants and contractors we 
engage and regular safety tours of our assets are 
undertaken by the property management team.

In addition, the wellbeing of our employees is a 
key focus for the Group and various activities are 
supported by the Board including the delivery of 
annual mental health workshops and company-
funded employee contributions to promote healthy 
lifestyle initiatives such as gym, or other sports 
club, memberships. In this way several people 
risks are somewhat mitigated.

49

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONRisk management continued

Risk assessment

As part of annual business planning, the Board 
undertakes an assessment of the risks that could 
threaten the Group’s strategic objectives, future 
performance, solvency or liquidity. Risks are 
reviewed in detail with their respective owners, 
typically a member of the Senior Leadership 
Team or key business leader.

We use a risk scoring matrix to consider the 
likelihood and impact of each risk at regular points 
throughout the year. 

The chart below illustrates the relative positioning 
of the potential impact and probability of the 
principal risks on the Group’s strategic objectives, 
financial position or reputation after mitigation. 
Internal or external forces, or a combination of 
both, will continue to have the potential to alter 
this positioning and therefore these risks are 
closely monitored throughout the year. In some 
cases the change in risk profile in the year is 
not sufficient to change the risk assessment 
category but instead indicates the change within 
the category.

The general risk environment in which the Group 
operates has remained at a higher level over 
the course of the year. This is largely due to 
the uncertain global and European economic 
conditions particularly higher interest rates and 
inflation and the impacts of the continued war 
in Ukraine and instability in the Middle East.

Throughout the year, the Board monitored the 
changing situation and considered its effect on 
the business, as it will continue to do so going 
forward. The impact of the macro-economic 
factors is discussed in the CEO review and the 
individual country property reviews.

Our principal risks are set out on the following 
pages 51 to 52. In evaluating these risks, 
any potential impact as a result of market 
uncertainties has been considered.

Principal risks

Property

Sustainability

Business interruption

Financing

Political & economic

People

2023 Risk 
Assessment

2022 Risk 
Assessment

High

High

Medium

Medium

Low

High

Medium

Medium

Low

High

High

Medium

Risk assessment  
vs risk appetite

4

1

Catastrophic

Major

Moderate

t
c
a
p
m

I

Minor

3

6

5

2

The Board’s risk appetite in relation to the Group’s 
principal risk assessment is broadly aligned. 
As shown in the table below, there is divergence 
of risk appetite and risk status in relation to the 
financing risk. The Board accepts that there are 
factors in relation to this risk that are outside 
the Group’s control and are likely to change over 
time. Mitigating actions have been put in place to 
ensure financing risk is adequately managed and 
monitored to reduce the potential impact on the 
Group. The Board recognises that not all risk can 
be fully mitigated and that they need to be balanced 
alongside commercial, and political and economic, 
considerations. If a difference between the Board’s 
risk appetite and the risk assessment persists for 
an extended period, whether and how the gap 
should be closed is discussed at Board level.

Principal risks

Property

Sustainability

Business interruption

Financing

Political & economic

People

Risk assessment

Risk appetite

High

Medium

Low 

High

Medium

Medium

High

Medium

Low 

Medium

Medium

Medium

Insignificant

Rare

Unlikely

Possible

Likely

Almost 
certain

Likelihood

KEY 
1. Property 
2. Sustainability 
3. Business interruption
4. Financing 
5. Political and economic
6. People

50

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTPrincipal risks

Our principal risks are discussed over the following pages along 
with any change in their risk profile since the last year end, the 
current direction of travel and our risk mitigation actions and plans. 
Whilst we do not consider that there has been any material change 
to the nature of the Group’s principal risks over the last 12 months, 
several risks remain elevated as a result of the challenging 
external environment and significant ongoing uncertainty.

The following pages are only focused on our principal risks 
being those that have the greatest impact on our strategy 
and/or business model. In addition, there are many lower 
level operational and financial risks which are managed 
on a day-to-day basis through the effective operation of 
a comprehensive system of internal controls.

Principal risk

Risk description

Key risks

Mitigation in 2023

Mitigation in 2024

1Property

STRATEGY

KPI/OPI
TSR(R), TAR

   Country review 
pages 10 to 15

Market fundamentals 
and/or internal 
behaviours lead to 
adverse changes to 
capital values of the 
property portfolio or 
ability to sustain and 
improve income 
generation from 
these assets.

•  Cyclical downturn in 
the property market 
which may be 
indicated by an 
increase in yields
•  Changes in supply 
of space and/or 
demand (vacancy 
rate)

•  Poor property/

• 

facilities 
management
Inadequate due 
diligence and/or 
poor commercial 
assessment of 
acquisitions

•  Failure of tenants
• 

Insufficient health 
and safety risk 
protection

•  Building 

obsolescence

•  Maintained strong relationships with our 

•  Continue with our 

current controls and 
mitigating actions

RISK ASSESSMENT

CHANGE IN RISK  
PROFILE IN THE YE AR

DIRECTION OF TRAVEL

occupiers, agents and direct investors active 
in the market and actively monitored trends in 
our sectors

•  Asset management committees meet once a 

month to discuss each property

•  Continued investment of £50.1 million in our 
properties with refurbishments taking place 
in over 30 properties to meet tenant demands 
(see page 18 for more detail)

•  Rigorous and established governance approval 
processes for capital and leasing decisions
•  Engagement with tenants to understand their 

needs and space requirements

•  Targeted capital expenditure with a focus 

on sustainability

•  Disposal of 4 properties with low yield, limited 

asset management potential or risk/reward ratio 
unfavourably balanced

•  Continued monitoring of covenant strength and 

health of tenants

•  High quality provision of property and facilities 
management services with our in-house team
•  Health and safety committee that closely monitors 

activity and regulation and reports to every 
Board meeting

2Sustainability

STRATEGY

KPI/OPI
TSR(R), TAR, VR, ACR

   ESG pages 32 to 47 
for more detail

3Business interruption

STRATEGY

KPI/OPI
TSR(R), TAR

As a result of a failure 
to plan properly 
for, and act upon, 
the potential 
environmental and 
social impact of our 
activities, changing 
societal attitudes, 
and/or a breach of 
any legislation, this 
could lead to damage 
to our reputation 
and customer 
relationships, loss 
of income and/or 
property value, 
and erosion of 
shareholder 
confidence in 
the Group.

Data loss; or disruption 
to corporate or 
building management 
systems; or 
catastrophic external 
attack; or disaster; 
may limit the ability 
of the business to 
operate resulting in 
negative reputational, 
financial and 
regulatory 
implications for 
long term 
shareholder value.

Transition risks:
These include 
regulatory changes, 
economic shifts, 
obsolescence, and the 
changing availability 
and price of resources.

•  Continued monitoring and oversight by the 

Sustainability Committee over key ongoing projects
•  Detailed Sustainability risk registers maintained, 

reviewed and updated

•  Continued implementation and active monitoring 

of NZC Pathway projects

• 

• 

Implementation of 
new sustainability 
data platform
Implementation of our 
climate resilience plan

•  Ongoing rollout of 

•  Completion of planned energy efficiency projects 

biodiversity net gain plan

Physical risks:
These are climate-
related events that 
affect our supply chain 
as well as the 
buildings’ physical 
form and operation; 
they include extreme 
weather events, 
pollution and changing 
weather patterns.

including all scheduled PV installations
•  Completion of all scheduled EV installations
•  Continued EPC upgrade programme
•  Recertification of relevant properties in the UK 

and France to BREEAM In-use V6
Independent assurance on EPRA sBPR KPI data

• 
•  Sustainable procurement policy published
•  Renewal of Sustainable refurbishment and 

fit-out guide

•  Achieved living wage accreditation
•  Continued engagement with occupiers including 

release of new occupier app

•  Continue with our 

current controls and 
mitigating actions

RISK ASSESSMENT

CHANGE IN RISK  
PROFILE IN THE YE AR

DIRECTION OF TRAVEL

•  Cyber threat
•  Large scale 

terrorist attack
•  Environmental 
disaster, power 
shortage or 
pandemic

•  Maintained a Centre of Internet Security ‘A’ rating
•  Maintained Cyber Essentials Plus certification 
•  Conducted penetration testing on the Group’s 

•  Continue with our 

current controls and 
mitigating actions

properties (e.g. simulate cyber-attacks on building 
management systems)

•  Continued implementation of shared property and 

finance system across the Group

•  Continued use of external partners for specialist 
cyber security activities and independent reviews
•  Transitioned to continuous and automated patching 

across all managed systems

•  Continued to test and train employees 

on cyber security

RISK ASSESSMENT

CHANGE IN RISK  
PROFILE IN THE YE AR

DIRECTION OF TRAVEL

51

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
Risk management continued

Principal risk

Risk description

Key risks

Mitigation in 2023

Mitigation in 2024

4Financing risk

STRATEGY

The risk of not being 
able to source 
funding in cost 
effective forms will 
negatively impact the 
ability of the Group 
to meet its business 
plans or satisfy its 
financial obligations.

KPI/OPI
COST OF DEBT

     Chief Financial Officer’s 
review pages 24 to 27

Significant events or 
changes in the Global 
and/or European 
political and/or 
economic landscape 
may increase the 
reluctance of investors 
and customers to 
make timely decisions 
and thereby impact the 
ability of the Group to 
plan and deliver its 
strategic priorities in 
accordance with its 
core business model.

The failure to attract, 
develop and retain the 
right people with the 
required skills, and in 
an environment where 
employees can thrive, 
will inhibit the ability 
of the Group to deliver 
its business plans 
in order to create 
long term 
sustainable value.

5Political and  

economic

STRATEGY

KPI/OPI
VR, ACR

6People

STRATEGY

KPI/OPI
TSR(R), TAR, 

DIVIDEND COVER

   ESG pages 32 to 47

• 

Inability to refinance 
debt at maturity due 
to lack of funding 
sources, market 
liquidity, etc.
•  Unavailability 
of financing at 
acceptable 
debt terms
•  Risk of rising 

interest rates on 
floating rate debt
•  Risk of breach of 
loan covenants

•  Foreign currency risk
•  Financial 

counterparty risk
•  Risk of not having 
sufficient liquid 
resources to meet 
payment obligations 
when they fall due

•  Ongoing transition of 
the UK from the EU 
•  Global geopolitical 

and trade 
environments

•  Failure to recruit 

senior management 
and key executives 
with the right skills

•  Excessive staff 
turnover levels
•  Lack of succession 

planning and 
development 
opportunities
•  Poor employee 

engagement levels

•  Financed, refinanced or extended 11 loans to a 

•  Continue with our 

current controls and 
mitigating actions

RISK ASSESSMENT

CHANGE IN RISK  
PROFILE IN THE YE AR

DIRECTION OF TRAVEL

value of £330.6 million

•  Weekly treasury meetings took place with the CEO 
and CFO including discussion of financing, rolling 
12-month cash flow forecasts, FX requirements 
and hedging, amongst other items

•  Weekly cash flow forecasts prepared and 
distributed to Senior Leadership Team

•  75.9% of the Group’s borrowings are fixed rate 

plus a further 3.8% of interest rate caps

•  Regularly monitored loan covenants
•  CLS borrows in local markets and in local 

currencies via individual SPVs to provide a ‘natural’ 
hedge (see page 19 for more detail)

•  Maintained a wide number of banking relationships 

with 25 lenders across the Group to diversify 
funding sources

•  Weighted average cost of debt remains low (3.61%)
•  Maintained average debt maturity of 3.5 years
•  Significant headroom across three main loan 

covenants of between 13% and 30%

•  All loans have equity cure mechanisms to 

repair breaches

•  Monitored events and trends closely, making 

•  Continue with our 

business responses if needed

•  Maintained membership of key industry bodies for 
example the British Property Federation, British 
Council of Offices and Better Buildings Partnership

•  Monitored tenants for sanction issues

current controls and 
mitigating actions

RISK ASSESSMENT

•  Undertook a Group wide Staff Engagement and 
Enablement Survey, completed by 88% of staff 
providing insight into the Group

•  Engagement with workforce advisory panel
•  Staff wellbeing week 
•  Monitored market to ensure competitive 
remuneration packages across the Group

CHANGE IN RISK  
PROFILE IN THE YE AR

DIRECTION OF TRAVEL

•  Continue with our 

current controls and 
mitigating actions
•  Assess feedback 
provided in Staff 
Engagement and 
Enablement Survey 
and implement 
appropriate changes.

RISK ASSESSMENT

CHANGE IN RISK  
PROFILE IN THE YE AR

DIRECTION OF TRAVEL

KEY TO STRATEGY

KEY TO RISK ASSESSMENT

WE ACQUIRE THE  
RIGHT PROPERTIES

WE SECURE   
THE RIGHT FINANCE

WE DELIVER VALUE 
THROUGH ACTIVE 
MANAGEMENT AND  
COST CONTROL

WE CONTINUALLY ASSESS  
WHETHER TO HOLD OR   
SELL PROPERTIES

WE REWARD 
SHAREHOLDERS, 
CUSTOMERS 
AND EMPLOYEES

HIGH

INCREASING

MEDIUM

DECREASING

LOW

NO CHANGE

52

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORT 
 
 
Emerging risks

We define emerging risks to be those that may 
either materialise or impact over a longer 
timeframe. They may be a new risk, a changing 
risk or a combination of risks for which the broad 
impacts, likelihoods and costs are not yet well 
understood, and which could have a material 
effect on CLS’ business strategy.

Emerging risks may also be superseded by 
other risks or cease to be relevant as the internal 
and external environment in which we operate 
evolves. The Senior Leadership Team, which has 
representatives from each area of the business, 
is tasked with identifying emerging risks for the 
business and discussing what impact these risks 
may have on the business and what steps we 
should be taking to mitigate these risks. The Board 
reviews these assessments on an annual basis.

Risk

Potential Impact

Mitigation

Time Horizon

Short 
< 2yrs

Medium 
2-5 yrs

Long > 5 
yrs

Adoption of 
technology

Artificial 
Intelligence

Failure to embrace technology could result in the 
Group falling behind its competitors in efficiency, 
thereby risking a loss of competitive edge. As 
buildings evolve to incorporate smart features, 
tenants may prefer such technologically advanced 
spaces over those lacking similar amenities. 
Neglecting occupant preferences for technology 
could diminish the attractiveness of the Group’s 
office properties, potentially leading to vacancies 
and a decline in rental revenue.

The automation of certain tasks through AI may 
lead to job displacement for those whose roles are 
automated but will also create jobs. This could have 
implications on our current tenant base which may 
impact office space requirements.

Regulation/
compliance

Increased capital cost of maintaining our 
property portfolio.

Increased administration costs to ensure resources 
sufficient to deliver corporate compliance.

We thoroughly examine emerging technologies to 
ensure that we extract the utmost value from any 
new system or service we opt to incorporate into our 
comprehensive digital and technological framework.

Active monitoring of the changing landscape 
through attendance at AI industry talks and 
regular discussion/awareness at the executive 
committee level.

Continued ongoing assessment of all properties 
against emerging regulatory changes and 
benchmarking of fit-out and refurbishment projects 
against third-party schemes.

Increasing 
energy and 
construction 
costs

Changes 
in office 
occupation 
trends

Climate 
change, 
natural 
resources 
and 
biodiversity 
risks

Increased cost of operating properties will reduce 
attractiveness of tenancies to existing and 
potential customers.

Ongoing consideration of, and investment in, energy 
efficient plant and building-mounted renewable 
energy systems.

Increased costs of refurbishments and 
developments leading to reduced 
investment returns.

Continued monitoring of materials, investment 
in key skills for staff and viability assessments 
of buildings.

Changes in social attitudes to agile and flexible 
working practices may reduce demand for space 
compared to historic trends.

Increased risk of weather-related damage to 
property portfolio and reputational impact of not 
evolving sustainability goals in line with global 
benchmarks and/or public expectations.

Inability to obtain sufficient carbon credits at 
suitable price to offset residual carbon emissions 
in order to achieve net zero carbon.

In-house asset management model provides 
the means for the property team to: proactively 
manage customers; and gain real-time insight 
and transparency on changes in needs and trends 
allowing us to adapt our properties to meet these.

Our sustainability strategy continues to evolve 
and has been developed in alignment with Global 
Real Estate Sustainability Benchmarks (GRESB), 
consideration of the UN Sustainable Development 
Goals (SDGs) and climate risk modelling.

We are investigating various solutions to achieve 
sufficient offsets by 2030.

53

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONGoing concern and viability statement

Going concern

Background
CLS’ strategy and business model include regular 
secured loan refinancings, and capital deployment 
and recycling through acquisitions, capital 
expenditure and disposals. Over the last thirty 
years, the Group has successfully navigated 
several periods of economic uncertainty, including 
the recent economic stress resulting from the 
Covid-19 pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine 
and the cost-of-living crisis.

The Group continues to have very high rent 
collection and low bad debts, and has a long-term 
track record in financing and refinancing debt 
including £330.6 million completed in 2023 and 
a further £103.2 million subsequent to year end, 
of which £88.5 million has been executed and 
£14.7 million for which credit approval has been 
obtained by lenders or terms have been agreed.

The Directors note that the interim financial 
information for the six months ended 30 June 2023 
contained disclosure of a Material Uncertainty 
related to going concern due to the timing and 
amounts of the planned refinancing of debt 
and disposals of property being then outside of 
Management’s control. In this context the Directors 
set out their considerations and conclusions in 
respect of going concern for these financial 
statements below.

Going concern period and basis
The Group’s going concern assessment covers 
the period to 31 July 2025 (“the going concern 
period”). The period chosen takes into 
consideration the maturity date of loans totalling 
£311.3 million that expire by July 2025. The going 
concern assessment uses the business plan 
approved by the Board at its November 
2023 meeting as the Base case. The assessment 
also considers a Severe but plausible case.

Forecast cash flows – Base case
The forecast cash flows prepared for the Base 
case reflect the challenging economic backdrop 
and include assumptions regarding forecast 
forward interest curves, inflation and foreign 
exchange, and includes revenue growth, principally 
from contractual increases in rent, and increasing 
cost levels in line with forecast inflation. 

The Base case is focussed on the cash and 
working capital position of the Group throughout 
the going concern period. In this regard, the 
Base case assumes continued access to lending 
facilities in the UK, Germany and France, and 
specifically that debt facilities of £311.3 million 
expiring within the going concern period will be 
refinanced as expected (£261.5 million) or will 
be repaid (£49.8 million), some of which are linked 
to forecast property disposals. The Board 
acknowledges that these refinancings are not fully 
within its control; however, they are confident that 
refinancings or extensions of these loans will be 
executed within the required timeframe, having 
taken into account: 

•  existing banking relationships and ongoing 

discussions with the lenders in relation to these 
refinancings; 

•  CLS’ track record of prior refinancings, 

particularly in the 12 months to 31 December 
2023 when £330.6 million was successfully 
refinanced or extended; and

•  recent refinancings subsequent to the year end 
that have been executed, credit approved by 
lenders, or where the terms have been agreed, 
totalling £103.2 million of the £311.3 million 
noted above.

The Base case also includes property disposals in 
the going concern period in line with the Group’s 
business model and the forecast cash flows 
approved by the Board in November 2023. The 
Board acknowledges that property disposals are 
not fully within its control; however, they are 
confident these transactions will be completed 
within the going concern period, based on their 
history of achieving disposals (with disposals of 
£73.5m achieved since 2022). The value of the 
properties available for disposal is significantly 
in excess of the value of the debt maturing during 
the going concern period.

The Group’s financing arrangements contain Loan 
to Value (‘LTV’), Interest Cover Ratio (‘ICR’) and 
Debt Service Coverage Ratio (‘DSCR’) covenants. In 
the Base case, minimal cure payments have been 
forecast given that the Group’s expects to maintain 
its compliance with the covenant requirements.

The near-term impacts of climate change risks 
within the going concern period have been 
considered in both the Base and the Severe but 
plausible case and are expected to be immaterial.

54

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTForecast cash flows – Severe but plausible case
A Severe but plausible case has been assessed 
which has been produced by flexing key 
assumptions further including: lower rents, 
increased service charges, higher property and 
administration expenses, falling property values, 
higher interest rates and reduced achievements 
of refinancings and disposals. 

These flexed assumptions are more severe than 
CLS experienced during the 2007-2009 global 
financial crisis and other downturns such as that 
experienced in 2020-2022 during the Covid-19 
pandemic. A key assumption in this scenario 
is a reduction in property values of 10% until 
December 2024, impacting forecast refinancings, 
sales and cash cures. This is in addition to the 
reduction experienced of 12.5% in 2023 and 17.1% 
since June 2022.

Assumptions around refinancing and investment 
property disposals are adjusted to only include 
those agreed or considered significantly advanced 
by management. In addition, a reduction in 
property values of 10% results in additional cure 
payments of £12.1 million being necessary for the 
Group to remain in compliance with its covenant 
requirements.

Due to the severity of the assumptions used in 
this scenario, which is severe but plausible and 
therefore not remote, the liquidity of the Group is 
exhausted even after putting in place controllable 
mitigating actions as set out below.

Mitigating actions
In the Severe but plausible case, CLS is assumed 
to take mitigating actions in terms of depositing 
cash to equity cure some loans, scaling back 
uncommitted capital expenditure (without 
impacting revenue streams over the going 
concern period) and reducing the dividend to 
the Property Income Distribution required under 
the UK REIT rules as well as drawing its existing 
£50 million of currently unutilised facilities. 
If needed, further disposals could be considered 
as there are no sale restrictions on CLS’ 
£2.1 billion of properties, albeit the timing and 
the amount of these potential disposals are not 
in the Group’s control.

Additionally, the Directors note that the properties 
that require refinancing in the going concern 
period are on a non-recourse basis to the Group. 
Accordingly, in extremis, the lender could enforce 
their security on an individual property with no 
claim on the rest of the Group’s assets.

Material uncertainty related to going concern
As described above, the Group is reliant for 
liquidity purposes upon its ability to both refinance 
the debt maturing and to complete a number of 
property disposals in the going concern period 
in more challenging market conditions.

Whilst the Directors remain confident, due to the 
reasons highlighted above, that a combination of 
sufficient refinancings and property disposals 
will be achieved, the timing and value of both the 
planned refinancing of facilities falling due within 
the going concern review period, and planned 
property disposals, is outside of management’s 
control and consequently a material uncertainty 
exists that may cast significant doubt on the 
Group’s and Company’s ability to continue as a 
going concern.

Notwithstanding this material uncertainty on the 
going concern assumption, given our track-record 
and reputation, the Directors are confident that 
the debt falling due for repayment in the going 
concern period will be refinanced or settled in line 
with their plans for the reasons set out above, 
rather than requiring repayment on maturity, or 
will be extinguished as part of property disposals 
in the period. In extremis, the loans requiring 
refinancing are provided on a non-recourse basis. 
Therefore, the Directors continue to adopt the 
going concern basis in preparing these Group 
and Company financial statements.

The financial statements do not contain the 
adjustments that would result if the Group 
and Company were unable to continue as a 
going concern.

55

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONViability statement

Viability 

The Group’s viability assessment follows a similar 
methodology to the going concern assessment 
in terms of analysing the Base case financial 
forecasts and a Severe but plausible case but 
makes the assessment of the viability of the 
company to continue in operation and meet its 
liabilities as they fall due over a considerably 
longer period.

The viability assessment covers the period to 
31 December 2027 (“the viability period”), a period 
chosen as it is coincident with the period of the 
forecasts approved by the Board at its November 
2023 Board meeting. These forecasts comprise 
the Base case but they have been updated for the 
actual results for 2023 and any changed 
assumptions. The period of 4 years was chosen as 
this is similar to the Group’s WAULT and weighted 
average debt maturity, and so aligns with the 
period over which the Group has good visibility.

In performing this assessment, the Board notes 
that the interim financial information for the six 
months ended 30 June 2023 contained disclosure 
of a Material Uncertainty related to going concern 
because the timing and amounts of the planned 
refinancing of debt and disposals of property at 
the time were outside of Management’s control. 
In this context the Directors set out their 
considerations and conclusions in respect of 
their viability statement for these financial 
statements below.

Viability assessment
As with the Going Concern assessment, the 
financial forecast prepared for the Base case 
takes account of the Group’s principal risks and 
uncertainties, and reflects the current challenging 
economic backdrop. The forecast uses forward 
interest rate curves, inflation and foreign 
exchange. The slower pace in the reduction 
in vacancy is forecast to continue. 

The Base case is focussed on the cash, liquid 
resources and working capital position of the 
Group including forecast covenant compliance. 
The forecast also assumes continued access to 
lending facilities but given the longer time period 
than the going concern period the amounts are 
consequentially greater. Within the viability period, 
debt facilities of £714.7 million expiring will be 
refinanced (£519.9 million) as expected or repaid 
(£194.8 million, which is linked to forecast 
property sales) taking into account:

•  existing banking relationships; 
•  CLS’ track record of prior refinancings, 

particularly in 2023 when £330.6 million 
was successfully refinanced or extended;

•  refinancings subsequent to year end that have 
been completed, or where terms have been 
agreed, or where negotiations are very 
advanced totalling £103.2 million of the 
£714.7 million expiring before 31 December 
2027; and

•  other ongoing discussions with lenders.

A Severe but plausible case was also produced 
by flexing key assumptions including: lower rents, 
increased service charges, higher property and 
administration expenses, falling property values, 
higher interest rates and reduced achievements 
of refinancings and disposals. These flexed 
assumptions are derived by considering the 
negative market and economic impacts 
experienced during the 2007-2009 global 
financial crisis and other downturns such as that 
experienced in 2020-2022 during the Covid-19 
pandemic. A key assumption in this scenario is a 
further reduction in property values of 10% until 
31 December 2024 which is in addition to the fall 
in value already experienced in 2022 and 2023 
but no subsequent bounce back in valuation has 
been assumed.

Assumptions around refinancing and 
property disposals are adjusted to only include 
those agreed or considered significantly advanced 
by management. In addition, a reduction in 
property values of 10% results in additional 
cure payments of £9.8 million being necessary 
for the Group to remain in compliance with its 
covenant requirements.

56

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTThe impacts of climate change risks within the 
viability period have been considered in the 
Severe but plausible case and are expected to 
be immaterial.

Due to the severity of the assumptions used in 
this scenario, which is Severe but plausible and 
therefore not remote, the liquidity of the Group is 
exhausted even after putting in place controllable 
mitigating actions as set out below.

In the Severe but plausible case, CLS would need 
to take mitigating actions in terms of depositing 
cash to equity cure some loans as envisaged 
under the facilities, stopping future acquisitions, 
scaling back uncommitted capital expenditure and 
reducing the dividend to the Property Income 
Distribution required under the UK REIT rules as 
well as drawing some of its existing £50 million of 
currently unutilised facilities of which £30 million 
is committed until October 2026 with the option 
to extend a further two years and £20 million 
is committed until November 2025 with an option 
to extend a further year. 

Additionally, the Board note that the properties 
that require refinancing in the going concern 
period are on a non-recourse basis to the Group. 
Accordingly, in extremis, the lender could enforce 
their security on an individual property with no 
claim on the rest of the Group assets.

Material uncertainty
The Directors highlighted in their going concern 
assessment (see note 2.1) that whilst they remain 
confident in the future prospects for the Group 
and its ability to continue as a going concern, the 
Group is reliant upon its ability to both refinance 
the debt maturing and to complete a number of 
property disposals in the going concern period in 
challenging market conditions. The same material 
uncertainty may also cast significant doubt over 
the future viability of the Group.

Our 2023 strategic report, from pages 1 to 57, 
has been reviewed and approved by the Board 
of Directors on 8 March 2024.

Approved and authorised on behalf of the Board.

David Fuller BA FCG
Company Secretary

8 March 2024

57

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONBOARD LEADERSHIP AND COMPANY PURPOSE

Chairman’s introduction 
Leading with purpose

 Our well 

established culture, 
collaborative 
approach and 
robust governance 
framework 
provides 
reassurance and 
confidence in 
uncertain times. 

Board focus areas in 2023

•  Reviewed and approved financial 

statements following recommendations 
from the Audit Committee

•  Commissioned an external evaluation of the 

performance of the Board and its Committees 

•  Carried out a review of our workforce 

engagement mechanisms

•  Continued to monitor the implementation 

of our Sustainability policy

•  Considered our financing strategy in light 

of the changing economic landscape

Priorities for 2024

•  Focus on big trends within the commercial 

property market

•  Oversee culture to provide assurance that 
the agreed values and culture are being 
embedded 

•  Continuous review of risk and uncertainties 
facing the Company and their implications 
for the business model 

58

Dear Shareholder

On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present 
the Corporate Governance Report for the year 
ended 31 December 2023. This report sets out 
our governance framework, the Board’s key focus 
areas in the last year as well as our approach 
to monitoring company culture and aligning our 
strategy with our purpose, vision and values.

This report also outlines how we have complied 
with the principles set out in the UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2018. Our code compliance 
statement can be found on page 59.

Living our purpose and culture
2023 continued to pose challenges, with 
inflationary pressures, rising interest rates, 
and general economic uncertainty being at the 
forefront of considerations for both the business 
and employees. As part of our commitment to 
adapt and evolve to the uncertain economic 
landscape, at our annual strategy day, the Board 
considered how our culture aligns to support the 
delivery of the Group’s strategy and underpins 
how we execute our business model. 

During the year, we discussed our culture and the 
key metrics that we use to monitor it through 
mechanisms such as feedback from employee 
forums, full and half year individual performance 
reviews, and the Staff Survey, which was 
externally facilitated through our partner, Korn 
Ferry. After careful evaluation, we concluded that 
the purpose, vision and values of the Group 
remained appropriate in setting the right culture 
and that management continued to implement the 
right workforce policies and practices that 
supported it. 

In line with the principles of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code guidelines on Board 
composition, succession and evaluation, we 
carried out a robust review of the independence, 
diversity and composition of our Board members 
in 2023 and you can find further information on 
page 71 of the Nomination Committee’s report.

A key focus for the Board, upon recommendation 
from the Nomination Committee, was to consider 
the independence of myself and Elizabeth 
Edwards given that we have both served as 
a director for more than nine years. It was 
concluded that, taking into account both mine and 
Elizabeth’s time commitment, the nature of our 
other non-executive roles, and our continued 
independent leadership and challenge at meetings 
demonstrating our independence, we remained 
independent and should continue to serve. 
The Board also concluded that this in turn 

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCEUK Corporate Governance Code

provided significant continuity and experience 
in a period of economic uncertainty and will 
assist in the induction of Eva Lindqvist, our new 
Board member.

Following the retirement of Chris Jarvis at the 
conclusion of the 2023 AGM, we commissioned 
an external search consultancy to assist in the 
appointment of a new non-executive director, 
with specific focus on diversity when 
gathering candidates. 

After a thorough selection process, Eva Lindqvist 
was appointed to the Board in September; an 
appointment that maintains our commitment to 
Board diversity. More can be read about Eva’s 
appointment on page 68.

External Board Evaluation 
This year we facilitated an external Board 
Evaluation with advisory firm Independent Audit. 
We were pleased to see they shared view that 
Board meetings were engaging, with there being 
no barriers to effective challenge and debate, and 
that there was a strong relationship between the 
Board and Senior Leadership team. Similarly, the 
positive feedback on management presentations 
to the Board, which were not only insightful but 
also key to the development of key personnel in 
the company. However, we also noted that we 
should spend more time discussing strategy and 
scenario planning.

Areas of focus for the year ahead will be on 
macro trends within the property sector and their 
impact on the execution of our strategy, as well 
as keeping abreast of the risks and uncertainties 
facing the business. We will look to refresh 
how we deliver our Strategy meeting to ensure 
we cover these important topics. Next year’s 
evaluation will be conducted internally and we 
will report on our actions from the findings of 
the 2023 evaluation.

Looking forward
Ensuring we have the right culture and values 
enables us to create and build strong and 
successful relationships with our key stakeholders, 
which is vitally important in the current economic 
landscape. This in turn creates an environment 
where we are able to remain resilient and seize 
opportunities when they arise, supporting the 
delivery of our long-term strategy to the benefit 
of all stakeholders.

Lennart Sten
Non-Executive Chairman

8 March 2024

Board leadership and Company purpose 

 See pages

Our Board of Directors is responsible for setting the Group’s strategy and ultimately 
ensuring the success of the Group. We aim to hold five Board meetings a year, including 
a strategy day. Our purpose is to transform office properties into sustainable, modern 
spaces, that help businesses to grow. This year we held seven Board meetings.

Board of Directors  

Board activities 

Approach to s.172(1)

Strategy, Purpose, Vision and Values

Division of responsibilities 

60-61

62-63

44-45

16-17 and 30

 See pages

This year we reviewed our division of responsibilities to ensure they reflect our Board structure.

Governance framework

Composition, succession and evaluation 

67

 See pages

Our Board consists of an Independent Non-Executive Chairman, two Executive Directors, 
three independent Non-Executive Directors and two non-independent Non-Executive 
Directors. Succession planning is reviewed periodically by the Nomination Committee. 
The evaluation of the Board and Committees’ performance is overseen by our Chairman.

Nomination Committee Report/Chairman’s statement 

External Board evaluation 

Audit, risk and internal control 

68-75

74-75

 See pages

The Audit Committee has oversight of the financial accounts production process and audit, 
and reviews the effectiveness of our risk management and internal controls system and 
the need for an internal audit function annually.

Audit Committee report 

Going concern basis

Viability statement

Assessment of the principal risks facing the Group 

Annual review of systems of risk management and internal control

Fair, balanced and understandable

76-80

80

80

51-53

78

78

Remuneration 

 See pages

The Remuneration Committee is responsible for the design, implementation and oversight 
of the Group’s Remuneration Policy, which was approved by shareholders on 27 April 2023. 

Remuneration Committee Report 

81-99

Principles and how the Company addresses them
The principal corporate governance rules which applied to the Company in 
the year were those set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code published 
by the Financial Reporting Council (‘FRC’) in April 2018 (the ‘Code’), the UK 
Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’) Listing Rules and the FCA’s Disclosure 
Guidance and Transparency Rules.

The Board fully supports the principles of good governance as set out in 
the Code, which is available on the FRC’s website (www.frc.org.uk), and 
its application of the main principles are set out on pages 58 to 103.

Compliance with the Code
Save as identified below and explained in this report, the Board considers 
that throughout 2023 it complied with the provisions of the Code.

During the year the Board recognises that it did not comply with Code Provision:
11 –  Board balance, explanation on page 69
17 –  Nomination Committee membership, explanation on page 68

59

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONBOARD LEADERSHIP AND COMPANY PURPOSE

Board of Directors
The right skills to deliver our strategy

 DIRECTORS TENURE

BOARD INDEPENDENCE

3

1

4
2

3

2

2

1. 0-2 years:  
2. 3-4 years:  
3. 5+ years:   

1
3
5

1. Non-independent:  
2. Independent: 
3. Chairman:  
4. Executives: 

BOARD MEMBERS’ RANGE OF EXPERIENCE

Number

Experience

1

1

2 
 4
1
2

Lennart Sten
Independent Non-
Executive Chairman 
1 August 2014 

background of financial experience from 
wide ranging industries and markets

of the property sector including our 
European markets

in-depth knowledge of dealing in, and 
the operation of, international markets

8 Property Wide ranging experience 
4  International markets Experience and 
4  Financial management Substantial 
7  Governance Significant listed company 
9  Risk management In-depth insight and 
9  ESG Knowledge of environmental, 

experience of risk management within 
the property sector

governance experience and 
understanding of investor requirements

social and governance issues facing 
listed and non-listed organisations 
in the property sector and wider UK 
businesses and charities

Anna Seeley
Non-Executive Director 
and Vice Chair 
11 May 2015 

3  Human resource Knowledge of HR 

operations, setting and monitoring 
culture, and diversity and inclusion

Fredrik Widlund
Chief Executive Officer 
3 November 2014 

56%

BOARD INDEPENDENCE 
INCLUDING THE 
CHAIRMAN AT 31 
DECEMBER 2023

44%

FEMALE REPRESENTATION 
AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2023

Visit our website to view the full 
biographical information for the Directors:  
https://www.clsholdings.com/about-us/
our-leadership

Andrew Kirkman
Chief Financial Officer 
1 July 2019 

60

Former roles: CEO, GE Capital Real Estate Europe. President, 
GE Real Estate Nordic. CEO Fabege AB. General Counsel, GE 
Capital Equipment Finances AB. Partner, Baker & McKenzie, 
Stockholm. Founder and CEO of Svenska Handelsfastigheter

Qualifications: Degree in Law, Stockholm University

Experience: International property industry. Board member, 
Interogo Holding AG. Chairman, KlaraBo Sverige AB

Attendance:
Board 7/7 
Remuneration Committee 4/4 
Nomination Committee 1/1 
AGM 1/1

Former roles: European Property Surveyor, General Electric 
Corporation and BT Group. Group Property Director, CLS 
Holdings plc. Chartered Surveyor, Chestertons 

Qualifications: Degree in Property Valuation and Finance, City 
University and Chartered Surveyor 

Experience: 20+ years of property industry  
and business experience

Attendance:
Board 7/7 
Nomination Committee 1/1 
AGM 1/1

Former roles: Global Commercial Leader, GE Capital 
International. Regional CEO, GE’s European Leasing businesses. 
Managing Director, GE Capital Real Estate. CFO, GE Capital 
Equipment Finance. Various positions with Royal Dutch Shell

Qualifications: Degree in Business Administration, Stockholm 
University

Experience: Business leadership, property and finance 
experience in global organisations. Trustee of Morden College, 
a social and housing charity

Attendance:
Board 7/7 
AGM 1/1

Former roles: Finance Director, Harworth Group plc. Finance 
Director, Viridor. Chief Finance Officer, Balfour Beatty Capital. 
Global Head of Corporate Finance, Bovis Lend Lease 

Qualifications: Masters in Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 
Oxford University. Fellow, Institute of Chartered Accountants

Experience: Extensive plc, property, finance and operational 
experience. Non-Executive Director, A2Dominion Housing 
Limited, a housing association

Attendance:
Board 7/7 
AGM 1/1

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCEFormer roles: Managing Director, Landesbank 
Berlin London. Head of BerlinHyp London 
office. Senior positions with National Australia 
Bank, Westdeutsche Immobilien. Management 
Consultant, PWC. Trustee Refuge

Qualifications: Fellow, Royal Institution of 
Chartered Surveyors. Honours Degree in 
Estate Management, South Bank University

Experience: Extensive commercial property 
investment and finance expertise in the UK 
and Europe (primarily Germany), Governance. 
Non-Executive Director, Schroders European 
REIT plc. Trustee, Central School of Ballet, 
Chair Audit Committee. Past Warden, the 
St Olaves and St Saviours Schools Foundation, 
member Finance and General Purposes 
Committee. Past Master, Worshipful 
Company of Chartered Surveyors, 
member Charity Committee.

Attendance:
Board 7/7 
Audit Committee 4/4 
Nomination Committee 1/1 
AGM 1/1

Former roles: Director, CLS Holdings plc 
(1992–2010). Former Junior District Court 
Judge in Sweden

Qualifications: Degree in Law, 
Stockholm University

Experience: European property market and 
Group business. Developed and runs hotels 
in St Vincent & Grenadines, West Indies

Attendance:
Board 7/7

Former roles: Solicitor, Slaughter and May, 
Director Asda Stores, Company Secretary and 
General Counsel Asda Group plc/Asda Wal 
Mart, Partner Eversheds Sutherland LLP, 
Chair St Giles Trust; Independent NED and 
SID Bellway plc

Qualifications: Law degree, Warwick 
University, Certificate in EU Studies 
Universite de Nice, Hon Doctorate of Law, 
Leeds Beckett University 

Experience: Legal advisory (corporate finance, 
M&A, regulatory, compliance and governance). 
Retail and property sector specialism. 
NED and Remuneration and Nominations 
Committee Chair, Pool Reinsurance; 
Chair and Pro Chancellor University of York; 
Trustee National Trust

Attendance:
Board 7/7 
Audit Committee 4/4 
Remuneration Committee 4/4 
AGM 1/1

Elizabeth Edwards
Senior Independent  
Director 
13 May 2014

Bill Holland
Independent 
Non-Executive Director 
20 November 2019

Bengt Mortstedt
Non-Executive Director 
7 March 2017 

Eva Lindqvist
Independent 
Non-Executive Director 
22 September 2023

Denise Jagger
Independent 
Non-Executive Director 
1 August 2019 

Christopher Jarvis
Non-Executive Director 
25 November 2008

Resigned 31 December 2023

Resigned 27 April 2023

Former roles: Senior Partner,  
KPMG real estate audit practice

Qualifications: Fellow, Institute of Chartered 
Accountants. Degree in Economics from 
Durham University

Experience: Real estate, finance and  
audit experience. Non-Executive Director, 
Urban&Civic plc, and Ground Rents Income 
Fund plc. Governor, Winchester College

Attendance:
Board 7/7 
Audit Committee 4/4 
Remuneration Committee 4/4 
AGM 1/1

Former roles: Senior roles, Ericsson. Senior 
Vice President, Telia Sonera telecoms division. 
Chief Executive, Telia Sonera international 
carrier. CEO, Xelerated Holdings AB.

Qualifications: MSc, engineering degree in 
Applied Physics. Marketing Diploma. Master 
of Business Administration. Melbourne 
Graduate School of Management. Helen 
Schytt Fellowship

Experience: NED, Tele2AB. NED, Greencoat 
Renewables plc, member Audit, Management 
Engagement, Nomination and Remuneration 
Committees. NED, Keller Group plc, Chair 
Remuneration Committee, member Audit 
and Risk, Nomination, and Governance and 
Sustainability Committees. Member of the Royal 
Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences.

Attendance:
Board 1/2 
Audit Committee 1/1 
Remuneration Committee 1/1

Former roles: Owner, Jarvis & Partners real 
estate consultancy. Partner, HRO Group. MD, 
Richard Ellis Germany

Qualifications: Chartered Surveyor. Masters 
in Land Economy, Cambridge University

Experience: Advising on all property-related 
matters, from debt financing to asset 
acquisitions, primarily in the German market

Attendance:
Board 1/1 
AGM 1/1

61

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

BOARD LEADERSHIP AND COMPANY PURPOSE

Key Board activities

Key announcements, decisions  
and Board approvals

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

•  AGM at which all 
shareholder 
resolutions 
passed

•  Approval of the 
2022 annual 
report and 
accounts
•  Approval of 

the 2022 final 
dividend
•  Main Board
•  Audit Committees
•  Remuneration 
Committees

•  Property tour 

•  Sale of three 

in Paris
•  Main Board

properties at 7.5% 
above valuation
•  Signing of 30-year 
lease in Essen, 
Germany
•  Exchanged 

contracts for the 
sale of 
Westminster 
Tower

How governance 
supports our business 
model and strategy

Our governance structure enables 
the Board to provide the necessary 
oversight of the Company’s long-
term strategic plan and 
business model.

The Board and Executive Committees 
facilitate the implementation of the 
Group’s strategy and business model 
with two way dialogue ensuring that 
the Group’s Vision, Purpose and 
strategic goals are aligned.

Clear reporting lines and division of 
responsibilities ensure efficient and 
effective strategic decision making.

  Read more on pages 16-21.

62

We acquire the 
right properties

We secure the 
right finance

We deliver 
value through 
active 
management 
and cost control

We continually 
assess whether 
to hold or sell 
properties

We reward 
shareholders, 
customers and 
employees

The Board Governance role

What we considered for 2023

Relevant stakeholders

Find out more

The Board considers the Group’s investment criteria and market conditions 
in the regions to ensure it supports its long-term strategy.

•  Investors

•  Employees

  Read more 

on pages 16 and 18

The Board considers the Group’s financing strategy to ensure it remains 
appropriate, dynamic and diverse.

•  Financial 

Institutions

  Read more 

on pages 17 and 19

The Board considers the Group’s operational strategy to deliver on the 
Group’s vision to be a supportive, progressive and sustainably focused 
commercial landlord.

•  Received updates on asset, property and facilities management operations

•  Ensured appropriate resourcing levels to facilitate active 

•  Tenants

•  Suppliers

  Read more 

on pages 17 and 20

•  Received detailed updates on the markets in which we operate together with 

investments at each Board meeting

•  Received presentations from the UK, German and French Valuers on market 

conditions and key portfolio risks and opportunities

•  Considered acquisitions and disposals strategy in light of challenging market 

and ability to meet investment criteria

•  Received updates on the Group’s debt position including covenant reports, 

cash flow and budgets.

•  Received detailed updates on the Group’s financing strategy

•  Considered the impact and use of other debt facilities including the approval 

of revolving credit facilities totalling £50 million

in-house asset management

•  Monitored performance against budget and organisational structure 

as part of cost control measures

•  Reviewed and approved 2024 budget and forecasts

The Board oversees management’s assessments to ensure the Company 
focuses on holding properties with the potential to add value in line with 
the Group’s investment strategy and sustainability goals.

The Board aims to grow the dividend in line with the growth in the 
business and in line with its dividend policy. It also ensures the reward 
structures for its employees underpin our values and support the 
success of the business. Our tenants are our customers, and we provide 
sustainable office space that helps businesses grow.

•  Received updates on vacancy rates and rent collections

•  Received senior management recommendations for capital and operational 

expenditure in relation to building management

•  Received updates on the sustainability strategy including the Net Zero 

•  Reviewed the Group’s strategy for the property portfolio at the Strategy Board 

Carbon pathway

meeting held in September 

•  Considered and approved interim and final dividend proposals, based on 

the financial performance of the Group

•  Considered appropriate reward structures for employees that reflect 

•  Approved capital expenditure budgets, supported by our sustainability strategy, 

Group performance

to deliver sustainable office space

•  Tenants

•  Communities

•  Suppliers

  Read more 

on pages 16 and 21

•  Investors

•  Employees

  Read more 

on page 17

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023AUG

SEP

NOV

•  Approval of the 2023 
half-yearly report 
and interim dividend

•  Main Board
•  Ad Hoc Board
•  Audit Committee

•  Consideration of the 

Group strategy

•  Sustainability Update
•  Financing Strategy 

discussion
•  Ad Hoc Board 

meeting to appoint 
Non-Executive 
Director
•  Strategy day

•  UK property tour
•  Trading update
•  Agreed two Revolving 

Credit Facilities 
totalling £50 million 

•  Main Board
•  Audit Committee
•  Nomination 
Committee
•  Remuneration 
Committee

The Board Governance role

What we considered for 2023

Relevant stakeholders

Find out more

The Board considers the Group’s investment criteria and market conditions 

•  Received detailed updates on the markets in which we operate together with 

in the regions to ensure it supports its long-term strategy.

investments at each Board meeting

•  Investors
•  Employees

  Read more 
on pages 16 and 18

•  Received presentations from the UK, German and French Valuers on market 

conditions and key portfolio risks and opportunities

•  Considered acquisitions and disposals strategy in light of challenging market 

and ability to meet investment criteria

The Board considers the Group’s financing strategy to ensure it remains 

•  Received updates on the Group’s debt position including covenant reports, 

appropriate, dynamic and diverse.

cash flow and budgets.

•  Financial 

Institutions

  Read more 
on pages 17 and 19

•  Received detailed updates on the Group’s financing strategy
•  Considered the impact and use of other debt facilities including the approval 

of revolving credit facilities totalling £50 million

The Board considers the Group’s operational strategy to deliver on the 

Group’s vision to be a supportive, progressive and sustainably focused 

•  Received updates on asset, property and facilities management operations
•  Ensured appropriate resourcing levels to facilitate active 

•  Tenants
•  Suppliers

  Read more 
on pages 17 and 20

commercial landlord.

in-house asset management

•  Monitored performance against budget and organisational structure 

as part of cost control measures

•  Reviewed and approved 2024 budget and forecasts

The Board oversees management’s assessments to ensure the Company 

focuses on holding properties with the potential to add value in line with 

the Group’s investment strategy and sustainability goals.

•  Received updates on vacancy rates and rent collections
•  Received senior management recommendations for capital and operational 

expenditure in relation to building management

•  Received updates on the sustainability strategy including the Net Zero 

Carbon pathway

•  Reviewed the Group’s strategy for the property portfolio at the Strategy Board 

meeting held in September 

•  Tenants
•  Communities
•  Suppliers

  Read more 
on pages 16 and 21

The Board aims to grow the dividend in line with the growth in the 

business and in line with its dividend policy. It also ensures the reward 

structures for its employees underpin our values and support the 

•  Considered and approved interim and final dividend proposals, based on 

the financial performance of the Group

•  Considered appropriate reward structures for employees that reflect 

success of the business. Our tenants are our customers, and we provide 

Group performance

sustainable office space that helps businesses grow.

•  Approved capital expenditure budgets, supported by our sustainability strategy, 

to deliver sustainable office space

•  Investors
•  Employees

  Read more 
on page 17

We acquire the 

right properties

We secure the 

right finance

We deliver 

value through 

active 

management 

and cost control

We continually 

assess whether 

to hold or sell 

properties

We reward 

shareholders, 

customers and 

employees

63

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONBOARD LEADERSHIP AND COMPANY PURPOSE

Relationship with stakeholders

The Company values its dialogue with 
both institutional and private investors

The Board’s primary contact with existing and 
prospective institutional shareholders is through 
the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial 
Officer, who have regular meetings with 
institutional shareholders. They also undertake 
analyst presentations following the Company’s 
half-yearly and annual financial results. They are 
supported by a financial relations advisor and 
during 2023 by three corporate brokers, all 
of whom are in regular contact with institutional 
and retail shareholders, and with analysts.

A report of feedback from each institutional 
investor meeting is prepared by the broker 
who organised it and a report of unattributed 
feedback from analysts on analyst presentations 
is prepared by the financial relations advisor. 
All such reports and coverage of the Company 
by analysts are circulated to the Board. 
Consequently, all Directors develop an 
understanding of the views of institutional 
shareholders and commentators.

Analyst presentations, following the 
announcement of half-yearly and annual financial 
results, are webcast and available on the 
Company’s website.

Slightly less investor meetings took place in 
2023, due to the EPRA and UBS conferences 
not being attended. 

The Committee and Panel Chairs seek regular 
engagement with stakeholders on significant 
matters as they arise. Further detail can be found 
in each Committee report.

KEY SHAREHOLDER EVENTS

MAR
Analyst presentation

30 institutional 
investor meetings 

3 Sales presentations

APR
1 institutional 
investor meeting

AUG
Analyst presentation

18 institutional 
investor meetings 

3 Sales presentations

SEP
6 institutional 
investor meetings

OCT
1 institutional 
investor meeting

NOV
1 institutional 
investor meeting

The Group issues its annual financial report to 
each of its shareholders. In accordance with the 
UK company disclosure regulations the Group 
does not distribute its half-yearly financial 
report to shareholders but makes it available 
on its website.

All shareholders have at least 20 working days’ 
notice of the Annual General Meeting at which 
all Directors who are available to attend are 
introduced and are available for questions. 
All shareholders are welcome to attend the 
Company’s Annual General Meeting and 
to arrange individual meetings by appointment. 
The views received at such meetings are fed 
back to the Board.

Proxy voting
The proxy forms for the Annual General 
Meeting which was held in 2023 included 
a “vote withheld” box.

Details of the proxies lodged for this meeting 
were announced to the London Stock Exchange 
and are on the Company’s website at 
www.clsholdings.com. Shareholders may 
also choose to register their vote by electronic 
proxy on the Company’s website.

At the 2024 Annual General Meeting, the Company 
will comply with the Listing Rules in respect of 
the voting requirements for the re-election of 
independent Directors where a Company has 
a controlling shareholder.

All financial reports and 
press releases are also 
included on the Group’s 
website at 
www.clsholdings.com.

2023 AGM

At the 2023 AGM, all the resolutions as set out 
in the Notice of Meeting were unanimously 
passed on a poll.

64

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCES
T
R
A
T
E
G

I

C

R
E
P
O
R
T

C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E

G
O
V
E
R
N
A
N
C
E

F

I

N
A
N
C

I

A
L

S
T
A
T
E
M
E
N
T
S

A
D
D

I

T

I

O
N
A
L

I

N
F
O
R
M
A
T

I

O
N

Workforce engagement

Helping to enhance our 
working environment

Dear Shareholder,

As Chair of the Workforce Advisory Panel, I am 
pleased to present the 2023 report from the Panel. 

Role of the Panel
Provision 5 of the Code requires the Board to 
understand the views of the Company’s key 
stakeholders, including the establishment of 
mechanisms to engage with the workforce. 
In recognition of the Code requirements, the Board 
established a Workforce Advisory Panel in 2019.

Main activities during the year
In January 2023, the Group reviewed its flexible 
working policy based on the needs of the 
business. As a result, the flexible working policy 
was updated to reflect the fact that being together 
more often better supported our purpose as a 
sustianable work space provider, our values and 
underlined the benefits of being together to 
discuss ideas and collaborate more efficiently 
and effectively. Throughout the year, the Panel 
received feedback on the implementation of the 
updated working from home policy, which was 
fed back to the Board. These communication flows 
enabled the Board and Senior Leadership Team 
to understand how the policy had been received 
and were able to engage with the wider workforce 
to explain the Company’s decision and address 
any concerns.

The uncertain macro economic landscape 
continued to be a frequent discussion, with 
inflationary pressures and rising interest rates 
having an effect on both the operation of the 
business and staff across the Group. The Panel 
also discussed the impact the economic 
environment had on company strategy and how 
this fed into workforce practices. As a result, 
Panel members were able to provide feedback 
on how company strategy was driving behaviours, 
which could then be articulated to the Board for 
further assessment.

As part of the evolution of the Company’s 
workforce engagement mechanism, the Panel 
reviewed its Terms of Reference and assessed 
the effectiveness of the current structure. 
We considered the purpose of the panel and the 
current meeting format. In addition, we reviewed 
the FRC consultation paper on workforce 
engagement trends that have arisen amongst 

WORKFORCE INCLUSIVIT Y
The Panel met four times 
during 2023.

At the start of 2023, the 
Panel consisted of seven 
employees from across 
the Group. The selection 
process is undertaken 
through an interview 
process from a shortlist 
of employees who either 
volunteered or were 
nominated by their peers. 

PANEL GEOGRAPHY

4

3

2

1

1  UK 
2  France 
3  Germany 
4  Luxembourg 

43%
14%
29%
14%

PANEL JOB FUNCTION

3

1

2

1  Legal, IT and Administration 29%
14%
2  Finance 
57%
3  Property 

FTSE companies since the implementation of the 
code provisions. The Panel concluded that, given 
the nature and complexity of CLS, an open forum 
meeting in each country throughout the year 
would be best suited to engage with the workforce 
going forward.

Looking forward
Following the recommendation by the Panel to 
hold open forums across the Group, the Board 
agreed that, given the differing sub-cultures that 
exist within each region, the Group should amend 
its approach to workforce engagement and adopt 
such an approach to gain a more detailed 
understanding of country specific workforce 
matters. This would in turn allow employees to 
directly voice their views on workforce practices 
and policies at local level, which should encourage 
more effective and broad ranging engagement.

As Senior Independent Director and designated 
workforce non-executive director, from 2024 it will 
be my responsibility to visit each office to host 
these wider meetings and understand the views of 
the workforce.

Elizabeth Edwards
Chair, Workforce Advisory Panel

8 March 2024

Our focus for the year ahead

•  Implement an enhanced mechanism 

for workforce engagement

•  Continue to facilitate communication 
between the Board and employees

•  Continue to discuss the views of 
the employees and review CLS’ 
workplace practices 

65

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
 
 
 
BOARD LEADERSHIP AND COMPANY PURPOSE

Culture dashboard

The Company values its dialogue with  
both institutional and private investors

Maintaining a healthy culture
We continue to promote an open, collaborative 
culture within our workforce, with an efficient 
decision-making structure which facilitates 
ownership and enables a hands-on 
operating process.

CLS’ culture and the role of the Board
The Board recognises the need to establish 
the correct culture, values and ethics to ensure 
good standards of behaviour are maintained 
throughout the Group.

We engage with our employees in a number 
of ways but primarily through the Workforce 
Advisory Panel and staff surveys to ensure 
the voice of the workforce is considered in our 
decision-making process.

The Board also receives information on human 
resourcing matters such as employee turnover 
and diversity statistics at each meeting.

These feedback mechanisms allow the Board to 
understand how the culture of the Group evolves 
and, through the Chief Executive Officer, facilitates 
changes to ensure the Group maintains its 
purpose, vision and values which underpins 
our culture.

How the Board assessed and monitors culture
The Board is able to assess and monitor Group culture through a range of key sources which are shown below. The Board 
understands that these key sources of data are crucial in maintaining good communication with the employees who are integral 
to ensuring the success of the Company.

Cultural priorities

Promoting 
integrity and 
openness

Being 
responsive to 
the views of 
stakeholders

Valuing 
diversity

Culture aligned 
to purpose and 
values

Culture aligned 
to strategy

Cultural identifier

Staff surveys and regular meetings with staff

Regular feedback through the Workforce Advisory Panel

Flexible Working Policy

Training budget per head

Whistleblowing Policy

Anti-bribery and Corruption Policy

Modern Slavery Policy

Anti-Tax Evasion Policy

Employee data (HR updates, turnover and exit interview feedback)

66

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCEDivision of responsibilities

The Board’s role
The Board has ultimate responsibility for setting 
the Group’s strategic direction, leading and 
overseeing culture, delivering value sustainably, 
understanding the risks the Group faces and 
ensuring that we uphold the highest standards 
of corporate governance.

Board and Committee structure
The Board is supported by the Audit, 
Remuneration, Nomination and Disclosure 
Committees who update Board members at each 
meeting. The Board discusses issues arising from 
Committee meetings which allows them to gain a 
wider understanding of the operation of the Group.

Chair leadership and effectiveness
As the Group’s Independent Non-Executive 
Chairman, Lennart leads the Board in promoting 
a culture of openness and debate to ensure the 
Board operates effectively. It is the Board’s culture 
and accepted practice to give regular feedback, 
but once a year a more formal feedback session 
is undertaken with the Non-Executive Directors, 
led by the Senior Independent Director without the 
Chair present. This session reviews the Chair’s 
overall performance, considering areas such as 
communication, effective leadership and oversight 
of the Board and company culture. The right 
“tone from the top” is key to support our purpose, 
vision and values. Lennart and the Board lead 
by example and the culture of openness and 
collaboration resonates throughout the Group.

Roles and responsibilities of the Directors
The Board’s composition and responsibilities are 
set out in a formal schedule of matters specifically 
reserved to it for decisions. Matters reserved 
for Board decisions include identifying strategic 
long-term objectives, approving the annual 
Group budget, and approving substantial 
property transactions and investment 
decisions over £10 million.

The implementation of Board decisions and the 
day-to-day operations of the Group are delegated 
to the Executive Directors.

Division of responsibilities
The responsibilities of the Independent Non-
Executive Chairman, who is responsible for the 
overall strategy of the Group, the Non-Executive 
Vice Chair who supports the Chairman, and the 
Chief Executive Officer, who is responsible for 
implementing the strategy and for the day-to-day 
running of the Group, are clearly divided. A written 
statement of the division of these responsibilities 
is reviewed and approved by the Board each year.

Board and committee structure (as at 31 December 2023)
THE BOARD 

Independent Non-Executive Chairman
Two Executive Directors
Four independent Non-Executive Directors
 Two non-independent Non-Executive Directors

Ensuring the Company’s growth and shareholder value

Audit  
Committee
FOUR INDEPENDENT 
NON-EXECUTIVE 
DIRECTORS

Remuneration 
Committee
FOUR INDEPENDENT 
NON-EXECUTIVE 
DIRECTORS

Monitors the 
arrangements for risk 
management, 
corporate reporting 
and internal controls. 
Maintains the 
relationship with 
the Auditor

Develops the 
Company’s policies on 
executive and senior 
management 
remuneration and sets 
the remuneration 
packages of individual 
Executive Directors 
and other senior 
management

Nomination  
Committee
ONE NON-
INDEPENDENT 
NON-EXECUTIVE 
DIRECTOR TWO 
INDEPENDENT 
NON-EXECUTIVE 
DIRECTORS

Monitors and evaluates 
the Board’s skills and 
experience to ensure 
full Board discussion

Executive Committee
Reviews the daily 
running of the 
Group’s business

Disclosure Committee
Monitors inside 
information and 
close periods

Financial Investment 
Committee
Analyses financial 
investment 
opportunities and 
reviews investment 
portfolios

Asset Management 
Committee
Reviews the Group’s 
property investments 
in each country

Senior Leadership 
Team
Reports on the day 
to day operation 
of the Group and 
implementation of 
strategy across each 
region and function

Health and Safety 
Committee
Reviews and 
moderates the 
Group’s policy and 
best practices for 
Health and Safety

CSR Committee
Assists in 
implementing the 
Group’s ESG strategy 
in relation to creating 
shared value within 
the community

Workforce 
Advisory Panel
Monitors and reviews 
the Group’s working 
practices and assists 
the Board in monitoring 
Company culture

Sustainability 
Committee
Monitors and reviews 
performance against 
the sustainability 
strategy, and reports 
on best practice and 
legislative changes

67

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONNomination Committee Report
Stability and continuity will 
be our focus during 2024

Dear shareholder

On behalf of the Nomination Committee, I am 
pleased to present my report as Chair of the 
Committee for the year ended 31 December 2023. 
This report is intended to give an insight into 
the work of the Committee during the year.

The Nomination Committee is responsible 
for ensuring the Board consists of members 
who have the relevant skills, experience 
and knowledge in order to set, and enable 
the executive directors to deliver, 
the Company’s strategy.

Role of the Committee
The Committee makes recommendations to the 
Board with regard to the nomination, selection 
and succession of directors and senior executives. 
The Committee also focuses on ensuring there is 
appropriate succession planning in place, having 
regard to the provisions of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code.

The Committee regularly evaluates the Board’s 
performance and effectiveness both as a group 
and as individual directors, and reviews the annual 
Board Evaluation process to ensure it continues 
to operate in the best possible way.

Membership and attendance
The Committee met formally once during 2023 
and held frequent discussions outside formal 
meetings. During the year, the Committee 
comprised three Non-Executive Directors, with 
a majority being independent. Given the Group 
has a Controlling Shareholder, the composition of 
the Committee reflects the need for independent 
oversight whilst recognising the shareholder base. 
The Company Secretary acts as Secretary to the 
Committee and its Terms of Reference are 
available on the Company’s website.

Main activities throughout the year
The Committee continued to fulfil its core 
responsibility to review the structure of the Board 
and its Committees. This year, we focused on 
the outcomes of our 2022 review, in which we 
undertook to broaden the Board’s experience 
following the retirement of Chris Jarvis at the 
conclusion of the 2023 Annual General Meeting 
having served for more than 14 years.

68

 Stability and 

continuity will 
be key during the 
current period 
of economic 
uncertainty. 

COMMITTEE MEMBERS’ 
ATTENDANCE DURING 
THE YEAR ENDED 
31 DECEMBER 2023

Anna Seeley
Lennart Sten
Elizabeth Edwards

In accordance with our policy on the appointment 
of new directors, we appointed an external search 
consultancy, Sapphire Partners, who specialise in 
championing a diverse range of candidates.

Following a two stage process, with candidates 
meeting members of the Committee and members 
of the senior leadership team, we recommended 
to the Board that Eva Lindqvist be appointed as 
a director, given her wide ranging commercial 
experience in listed companies. This included 
significant remuneration committee experience, 
which we required in order for her to become our 
new Remuneration Committee Chair following 
Denise Jagger’s departure on 31 December 2023.

At the end of 2023, following Eva’s appointment, 
we again considered the mix of experience, tenure, 
background, industry knowledge and constructive 
challenge of our Group strategy. It is the opinion of 
the Committee, and endorsed by the Board, that 
the Chairman and all the Non Executive Directors 
bring independence of judgement and character, 
a wealth of experience and knowledge, and the 
appropriate balance of skills, which are 
appropriate to effect oversight and 
implementation of the Group’s strategy.

As highlighted in this year’s internal Board 
Evaluation process, we continued our aim to 
establish working relationships with both our 
fellow Board members and more employees 
within the Group. We achieved this through a 

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
 
 
Paris property tour in May, an onsite strategy 
meeting in September and a UK property tour in 
November, where we also met both formally and 
informally a number of key members of the team 
across a broad range of functions below Board 
level. It reiterates to us the value of in-person 
meetings, impromptu discussions and time 
outside of formal meetings to get to know each 
other better.

We continued to focus on diversity and succession 
planning, which included reviewing our pipeline 
of internal talent. Our process for this review 
is set out later in this report. We received a 
comprehensive presentation from Fredrik Widlund 
on succession planning at executive and below 
Board level, which the Committee discussed at the 
full Board. This provided the Committee and the 
Board with an insight into the depth of our talent 
pool where we have fantastic employees, and it 
also highlighted some of the challenges we face 
in retaining the next generation of senior leaders 
with a relatively flat organisational structure. 
Our focus on gender and ethnic diversity at Board 
level continues; at the year end, over one third 
were women and together the Board has a broad 
range of skills and experience to support the 
implementation of our strategy. Additionally, 
Elizabeth Edwards serves as our Senior 
Independent Director and Eva Lindqvist chairs 
our Remuneration Committee. We recognise 
the importance of ethnic diversity in Board 
composition and it will continue to form part of 
our considerations in future appointments, in line 
with our Diversity, Equity and Inclusion policy.

Appointments to the Board
As recommended by the UK Corporate 
Governance Code, the Committee leads the 
process for Board appointments and makes its 
recommendations to the Board for final approval. 

Our process for Board appointments starts with 
the Committee’s review of Board composition, 
taking into account the skills, experience and 
background that it needs to fulfil its objectives. 
If an appointment is recommended, it is the 
Committee’s policy to use an open advert and/or 
an external search consultancy for the 
appointment of the chair and non-executive 
directors. In line with our diversity, equity and 
inclusion policy, we expect our external search 
consultancy to provide us with a diverse selection 
of candidates from which to short list.

A detailed role specification is reviewed with the 
Chairman and the Committee following which a 
final role specification is then approved.

PROFESSIONAL 
DEVELOPMENT AT 
A GLANCE

The Committee then initiates a two stage interview 
process, with candidates first meeting members 
of the Committee, then other members of the 
senior leadership team.

Following these interviews, a shortlist of two 
candidates will be made based on their level of 
experience, commercial focus and broad skill sets, 
and a decision made.

Prior to making recommendations to the Board, 
the Committee also considers the time 
commitment expected of the proposed director 
in line with any other commitments they may 
have already.

Directors are also required to seek approval from 
the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer prior 
to accepting additional commitments to ensure 
that they will be able to continue devoting a 
suitable amount of time to the Company.

TRAINING AND 
INFORMATION SESSIONS

SITE VISITS, BOARD 
DINNERS AND 
BREAKFAST MEETINGS

BRIEFING MATERIAL 
ON BOARD PORTAL

DEEP DIVES ON 
KEY TOPICS

MANAGEMENT AND 
ONE-TO-ONE MEETINGS

Induction and ongoing development
It is important for all Directors, both Executive 
and Non-Executive, when joining the Company, 
to be provided with, and given an insight into, 
the Company’s operations, culture and values.

I set out our induction programme, which has 
been designed to involve a full overview of the 
Group and how it operates:

•  Individual meetings with the Non Executive 
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and the 
Chief Financial Officer.

•  A programme of meetings with country leaders 

and senior managers across the Group to 
understand key operational matters

•  Bespoke tours of the Group’s portfolio and 
offices in the UK, Germany and France

As part of ongoing development, the Board aims to 
hold one Board meeting a year either in France or 
Germany, preceded by a property tour, so that it 
can gain first hand knowledge into the activities, 
challenges and opportunities across the portfolio.

69

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONNomination Committee Report continued

Our individual portfolio tours and Board meetings 
allow Directors to engage directly with a range of 
employees below Board level, which we believe is 
important in relationship building, understanding 
our talent pipeline, people and culture. It also 
raises the profile and understanding of the role 
of the Board and its governance responsibilities. 
Meetings are also arranged with key advisors 
such as the external auditor, valuers and 
brokers on an ongoing basis both at Board 
level and individually.

Ongoing training and development beyond 
the induction process is encouraged, with 
updated schedules of events produced at 
each Board meeting.

This year, the Board was able to visit our portfolio 
in Paris where they also met with a number of our 
property team, allowing them to gain a greater 
understanding of our properties and meet more 
employees below Board level. We also undertook 
a UK property tour in November, visiting a number 
of our London properties and were able to meet 
with our property teams and tenants at 
each location.

We are fortunate to have a Board that has 
established relationships and I am pleased to 
see the strength of those relationships develop.

Succession planning
In considering succession planning for the Board, 
the Committee assesses its optimal composition 
in terms of skills and experience, and aligns it to 
medium and long-term time horizons primarily 
based on individual tenure and the need to refresh 
Board membership. Because of the composition 
of the Committee, on which I serve as the 
representative of the majority shareholder, these 
plans are discussed with their input. As noted 
above, no appointments are made without full 
and open discussion through an independent 
search consultancy.

While identifying and developing talent across 
the Group remains primarily the responsibility 
of management, we have a duty to secure its 
long-term success.

The Committee received updates from the 
Chief Executive Officer in relation to succession 
planning, both at Board and senior management 
level, to ensure there is a good quality pipeline 
in place. This enabled the Committee to challenge 
those plans in order to understand the actions 
taken to enhance the pipeline, ensuring there is 
representation from a diverse range of employees.

70

SUCCESSION PLANNING 
REVIEW PROCESS

and high performers

with Heads of Functions 

individuals’ development 
needs and timeline

1Individual CEO meetings 
2Assessment of teams 
3Identification of 
4Group-wide report 
5CEO presents to the 
6Nomination Committee 

presents key findings to 
the Board

Nomination Committee

compiled

During the year we have been able to monitor 
the Group succession plans noting where we 
have potential internal successors or where 
we have to undertake an independent external 
appointments process.

The Committee is acutely aware that retaining 
talent is key to the successful execution of our 
succession plans. We also appreciate that, as a 
relatively small and flat organisation, this can be 
challenging. Through monitoring, benchmarking 
and career development opportunities we aim to 
retain our best talent.

Board composition and skills
As explained previously, following the appointment 
of Eva Lindqvist in September and the retirement 
of Chris Jarvis in April, we are confident in our 
structure and operation of the Board together 
with the balance of skills and experience of our 
directors in order to deliver on our strategy. 
These factors were highlighted in the 2023 
external Board Evaluation process.

At the year end, the Board consisted of two 
Executive Directors, four independent Non-
Executive Directors (excluding the Chairman) and 
two non-independent Non-Executive Directors.

Of the two non-independent Non-Executive 
Directors: I am a director of Creative Value 
Investment Group Limited (CVIG), the investment 
vehicle for The Sten and Karin Mortstedt Family 
& Charity Trust; and Bengt Mortstedt remains 
one of our largest shareholders.

The Committee notes that while Board 
composition has not complied with Provision 11 
of the Code during the year, it believes that the 
composition reflects the skills required to meet 
the current needs of the Group to ensure it will 
support the delivery of its strategy.

We ensure that all Non-Executive Directors 
(both those deemed to be independent and 
non-independent by the Board) maintain their 
independent oversight of the Executive Directors 
so that there can be no perception of undue 
closeness. This is undertaken through our review 
of Board composition, in light of the criteria set out 
in Provision 10 of the Code, the Board Evaluation 
process and the Chairman’s annual review, which 
also considers the interaction between Board 
members during meetings. This continues to 
demonstrate that there is objective and 
independent judgement, and that constructive 
challenge exists amongst Board members.

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCEOUR FOCUS FOR  
THE YEAR AHEAD

•  Oversee induction of 
new Board member
•  Annual review of our 
succession plans for 
the Board 

•  Annual review of 

succession plans and 
talent pipeline below 
Board level 
•  Ongoing Board 
development 

•  Implement findings 
from external Board 
Evaluation process 

As an additional process this year, because we 
recognise that during the year both the Chair, 
Lennart Sten, and Elizabeth Edwards, Senior 
Independent Director, have now served more than 
nine years, the Board (in their absence) considered 
their ongoing independence. We took into account 
their other roles outside of the Group, their time 
commitment and independent leadership and 
contribution to discussions at Board meetings 
and concluded that they remained independent.

On recruitment, our policy is that we expect our 
search consultants to ensure, where possible, 
there is a diverse selection of candidates. 
We ensure that this is not for just gender but 
also all diversity characteristics; a policy that we 
encourage throughout the Group when recruiting. 
To this end, we ask our search firms for all 
recruitment levels across the Group to aim for 
a long list of at least 50% women and appropriate 
diversity representation.

We recognise that there are significant benefits 
of diversity, including age, gender, ethnicity, 
core skills, experience and educational and 
professional background, which we continue 
to evaluate whenever changes to the Board’s 
composition are considered.

The Board recognises that there is work to be 
done in relation to gender diversity, especially 
at senior management level. We believe this will 
be a gradual process as the workplace evolves 
and policies, such as in the area of parental leave, 
are aligned to offer equal benefits.

Our Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Policy 
underlines our commitment to attracting, 
promoting and developing talent no matter 
who they are.

Anna Seeley,
Chair, Nomination Committee

8 March 2024

We explained in last year’s report that the Board 
strongly believes, during a period of economic 
uncertainty and with the addition of Eva Lindqvist, 
providing continuity is essential and therefore 
Lennart and Elizabeth will remain in post-beyond 
nine years. We will keep this decision under 
regular review during 2024.

Training
In order to ensure that the Directors’ knowledge 
and skills remain up-to-date, Directors are 
encouraged to attend regular training courses. 
As part of the Board papers, Directors receive a 
training schedule which highlights key events and 
seminars due to be held in the following quarter. 
The Company Secretary also provides regular 
governance updates to the Board.

Diversity
The Board’s policy is that the selection of new 
Board members should be based on the best 
individual for the role and that the Board’s 
composition should have an appropriate balance 
of skills and diversity to meet the requirements 
of the business.

The Committee has met its target for female 
representation at Board level during 2023 
(44% at the year-end) and continues to monitor 
and support the aims and objectives of the Parker 
Review and the FTSE Women Leaders Review. 
We are wholly supportive of the changes to the 
Listing Rules and we note our Board is well on the 
way to compliance with gender diversity, and one 
senior board position is already held by a woman.

71

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONNomination Committee Report continued
Board Diversity Policy

Objectives

POLICY OBJECTIVES 
Ensure the Board comprises an 
appropriate balance of skills, 
experience and knowledge required to 
oversee and support the management 
of the Company effectively.

Ensure consideration is given to 
candidates for Non-Executive Director 
Board appointments from a wide pool, 
including those with no listed company 
Board experience.

Ensure Board appointment ‘long 
lists’ contain diverse candidates, 
including diversity of social and ethnic 
backgrounds, and cognitive and 
personal strengths.

Targets

IMPLEMENTATION 

An executive search firm, Sapphire Partners, was used for the appointment of a further Non-
Executive Director during 2023 to ensure a diverse level of candidates. The Committee continues to 
monitor the composition of the Board and meets at least annually to review and discuss it.

The brief that is given to our independent executive search firms is to ensure that this Policy objective 
is met. When considering appointments to the Board, the Committee endeavours to consider 
candidates with a broad range of experiences. For the appointment of Eva Lindqvist, we used 
Sapphire Partners, a search firm specialising in ensuring diverse candidates.

The brief that is given to our independent executive search firms is to ensure that this Policy objective 
is met. When considering appointments to the Board, the Committee endeavours to consider 
candidates with a broad range of experiences. We ensured that this was adhered to during our 
appointment process in 2023.

POLICY TARGETS 
40% women representation on the Board. 44% female representation on our Board at 31 December 2023. 38% at the date of this report. 

PROGRESS AGAINST TARGET

Currently at least one third female representation on our Board as at the year end.

Minimum of one Board Director from 
an ethnic minority background.

In line with the Principles of the Parker Review, when the Board seeks to appoint a Non-Executive 
Director, it will expect its independent consultants to ensure candidates come from a diverse range 
of backgrounds. Currently not met.

One senior Board position held 
by a woman.

Elizabeth Edwards is our Senior Independent Director and therefore this target has been met.

Data on diversity of the board and executive management

A) Table for reporting on gender identity or sex

NO OF BOARD  
MEMBERS

 PERCENTAGE OF 
THE BOARD

NUMBER OF SENIOR 
POSITIONS ON 
THE BOARD  
(CEO, CFO, SID 
AND CHAIR)

NUMBER IN  
EXECUTIVE  
MANAGEMENT

PERCENTAGE OF  
EXECUTIVE  
MANAGEMENT

Men

Women

other

Not specified/prefer not to say

B) Table for reporting on ethnic background

White British or other White 
(including minority-white groups)

Mixed/Multiple Ethnic Groups

Asian/Asian British

Black/African/Caribbean/Black British

Other ethnic group, including Arab

Not specified/prefer not to say

5

4

–

–

9

–

–

–

–

–

56

44

–

–

100

–

–

–

–

–

3

1

–

–

4

–

–

–

–

–

7

–

–

–

6

1

–

–

–

–

100

–

–

–

86

14

–

72

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCESnapshot of Company skills & diversity at 31 December 2023

GENDER DIVERSIT Y
BOARD

LENGTH OF TENURE
(YEARS)

COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD

2

2

3

1

1.  MALE
2.  FEMALE

56%
44%

EXECUTIVE COMMIT TEE

1

1.  0 – 5
2.  6 – 10

4
5

2

1.  EXECUTIVE
2.  INDEPENDENT
3.  NON-INDEPENDENT

2
5
2

1

1

1

AGE RANGES 
(TOTAL EMPLOYEES)

ETHNICIT Y 
(UK EMPLOYEES)

1.  MALE
2.  FEMALE

2
0

5

4

5

SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM

1

3

1.  20 – 29
2.  30 – 39
3.  40 – 49
4.  50 – 59
5.  60 – 79

1

23%
23%
31%
18%
5%

4

3
2

1.  WHITE
55%
2.  ASIAN
18%
3.  BL ACK
2%
4.  MIXED
7%
5.  DID NOT RESPOND 18%

1.  MALE
2.  FEMALE

7
0

2

1

73

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONNomination Committee Report continued
Review of Board effectiveness

Appointment of consultants 
The Board appointed Independent Audit Limited 
to undertake the review of the effectiveness of 
the Board for 2023, using their online governance 
assessment service Thinking Board. They have 
no connection with CLS or any individual director.

Key to Independent Audit Limited’s appointment 
was their ability to compare the results of the 
2023 review with those of the 2020 review, which 
gave the Board a greater insight into how its 
effectiveness has evolved over the medium term.

Over the subsequent two years an internal 
questionnaire is used to assess Board 
effectiveness. Each year, the results of the 
review together with those of the previous year, 
are discussed in detail and enable the Board 
to understand better whether there have been 
improvements in the operation of the Board 
and also where it can be enhanced. 

Based on the results of the 2023 review, 
this approach met the Board’s objective.

Board Effectiveness Framework 
The external process covered the key areas of: 
Board Leadership and Company Purpose; Division 
of Responsibilities; and Composition, Succession 
and Evaluation. 

The primary purpose of the review was to direct 
the Board’s attention to areas where there might 
be opportunities to improve its performance. 

The report was broken down into themes, which 
corresponded to the groupings of questions 
covering the key topics highlighted in the chart. 

74

EVALUATION PROCESS

YEAR 1Externally facilitated 

questionnaire using 
Independent Audit’s 
Thinking Board 
Software. The process 
was divided into 
four stages:

1st

STAGE

Design and scope of questionnaire 
to address core areas and key 
themes, and facilitate the ability 
to provide confidential written 
responses to where improvements 
could be made.

2nd

STAGE

External questionnaire including 
follow up on results of previous 
performance evaluations.

and follow up on 
results of previous 
performance 
evaluations

YEAR 2Internal questionnaire 
YEAR 3Internal questionnaire 

and follow up on 
results of previous 
performance 
evaluations. 

3rd

STAGE

Review of the results of the 
questionnaire and benchmark 
findings against the 2022 internally 
facilitated review outcomes 
as well as 2020 external 
evaluation outcomes.

4th

STAGE

Presentation of report to the 
Board for discussion and to 
prepare a plan for achieving 
desired outcomes.

BOARD EVALUATION   
FRAMEWORK

BOARD LEADERSHIP AND 
COMPANY PURPOSE 

DIVISION OF 
RESPONSIBILITIES 

COMPOSITION, 
SUCCESSION AND 
EVALUATION 

After an introductory overview, each thematic 
section provided a chart of the responses, with 
commentary that summarised the findings, drew 
out key points, and contextualised the results based 
on the experiences of other review processes. 

The review was presented to the Board for 
discussion at its January 2024 meeting.

Engagement
Strategy
Leadership
Governance
Succession
Challenge
Risk
Engagement
Structure
Role
Dynamics
Composition

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCE2023 EXTERNAL BOARD EVALUATION RESULTS AND OBJECTIVES FOR THE FORTHCOMING YEAR 
Four key areas within the internal Board Evaluation Framework

1.  STRATEGY,  

RISK & FINANCE

The Board was clear on what it needs to achieve the 
organisation’s purpose. Whilst there was a clear 
understanding of risk, additional time should be 
dedicated to assessing emerging risks in order to 
better scenario plan.

Enhanced focus on “big trends” and resulting 
key risks, looking at major shifts in the property 
market and meeting customers’ needs and 
expectations. Review resilience of the future 
business model.

2024 OBJECTIVE

2.  PEOPLE, CULTURE 
& STAKEHOLDERS

The Board noted the improvements in risk reporting, 
especially cyber risks, and their documentation.

There was agreement that the Board ensures the 
leadership team is effective and an acknowledgement 
that the Executive team has risen to the challenge. 
The Board works well with management although 
there was a desire to spend more informal time 
together, and find opportunities for management 
to benefit more from the NEDs’ expertise. 

Further work was need to ensure culture was 
monitored and embedded, and to hear more about 
what matters to employees.

There was a strong sentiment that the Board 
incorporates environmental, social and governance 
(ESG) considerations into the strategic decision-
making, with nearly all respondents believing this 
works well. 

More monitoring of culture to provide assurance 
that the agreed values are being embedded. 

Ensure regular feedback on employee matters 
to ensure it is in line with values and long-term 
success of the business.

Continue the programme of more contact with 
senior leaders below Board level and better 
interaction with employees at all levels.

3.  MIX, INFORMATION 

AND 
DEVELOPMENT

The Board performed well in bringing the right people 
to board discussions. There was recognition of the 
positivity in having senior managers at Board 
meetings, whether sitting in or making presentations, 
acknowledging it is excellent for their own development. 

More time for deep dives on progress around 
specific objectives.

Develop channels to feedback on the operation 
and value of the Board within the organisation. 

4.  MEETINGS, 

DYNAMICS AND 
COMMITTEES

Board meetings worked well, assisted by the fact they 
are face-to-face, with effective management of the 
agenda. Similarly, discussions are inclusive, with 
free-form comments praising the open dialogue, 
focus and quality of communication. Debates are felt 
to remain structured and to the point. 

All three committees are functioning well in terms 
of effective chairing, quality of discussions and the 
support they receive. 

Review and update directors’ responsibilities. 

Continue to consider the skills of the Board 
for future NED appointments, specifically with 
experience of European asset management 
in an entrepreneurial environment.

Increase interaction with the Chair through 
dedicated one to one sessions. 
Facilitate opportunity to spend more time 
with executive and management teams 
to share experiences.

OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES ARISING FROM 2022 EXTERNAL BOARD EVALUATION RESULTS 

OBJECTIVES

OUTCOMES 

Continue to have: more contact with senior leaders below 
Board level; and better interaction with employees at 
all levels.

Continue to focus on the documentation of internal 
controls. Continue to develop the discussions around risks.

Implemented focus sessions, within the meeting agenda, on key areas of the business which 
has enabled it to meet with many senior leaders below Board level to present on their area 
of expertise. In May and November, the Board went on Paris and London property tours 
respectively, supported by our wider asset, property and facilities management teams.

Key and emerging risks discussed in March and August. Annual strategy meeting in October 
focused on strategic opportunities and risks. At the Audit Committee meeting in November, a 
comprehensive update on the documentation and testing of internal controls was presented.

Continue focus on employee engagement and 
communications below Board through various activities 
including property tours and informal meetings.

Employee engagement through the Workforce Advisory Panel, property tours and informal 
meetings including “Meet the Chair” and other CSR initiatives to which Board members 
were invited.

Develop informal communication channels between the 
Board members. More interaction with the Chair and more 
contact with the business.

The Board now meets in-person throughout the year. At its May meeting and November 
Board meetings, the Board met for dinner with members of the Senior Leadership Team, 
which enabled informal conversations between members. The Chair initiated various ad-hoc 
calls during the year, speaking with each Board member individually.

75

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONAudit Committee Report 
Ensuring oversight, risk management 
and integrity of financial reporting

Dear shareholder

On behalf of the Audit Committee, I am pleased to 
present the report of the Committee for the year 
ended 31 December 2023. This report is intended 
to provide an insight into the work of the 
Committee during the year.

Role of the Committee
The Committee’s main roles and responsibilities 
are set out below and reflect the Code provisions. 
The Committee has Terms of Reference, which 
are reviewed annually and are available on the 
Company’s website.

Membership and attendance
Eva Lindqvist was appointed to the Committee 
on 22 September 2023 following her appointment 
to the Board. She joins the Committee and has 
experience of other audit committees through 
her non-executive director positions.

Denise Jagger left the Board and therefore the 
Committee on 31 December 2023.

My experience means I have recent and relevant 
financial experience, and my fellow Committee 
members all have significant experience of the 
real estate and other commercial sectors. 
Further details of our experience can be found 
on pages 60 to 61.

The Committee met four times during 2023.

This year the Committee has focussed on a 
number of significant financial judgements.

Political and Economic risk
The potential for prolonged higher interest rates 
and elevated levels of inflation were key 
considerations for the Committee when assessing 
the changing risk environment. This year, our 
focus was to ensure that, in light of the challenging 
market conditions, the assumptions made by 
the valuers underpining the valuations were 
adequately robust. We received presentations 
from our valuers in each region and had the 
benefit of reviewing their reports in advance. 
This enabled the Committee to challenge the 
valuers where there was a significant valuation 
variance from prior period ends. The Committee 
is of the view that the valuations are appropriate.

76

Going Concern
A significant focus for the Committee this year has 
been our review of the Going Concern assessment.

At the half year and the year end, the Committee 
noted that in the “Severe but plausible” scenario, 
the Group is reliant upon its ability to both refinance 
maturing debt and to complete a number of 
investment property disposals in the going concern 
period in challenging market conditions. 
Management remain confident that, whilst 
sufficient refinancing and property disposals would 
be achieved, the planned refinancings of facilities 
falling due within the going concern review period, 
and planned property disposals, were outside 
management’s direct control. Consequently we 
supported the conclusion that a material 
uncertainty existed in the “Severe but plausible” 
scenario that could cast significant doubt on the 
Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Auditors had reviewed Management’s 
paper on the assessment of the Group’s going 
concern, they also concluded that a material 
uncertainty existed.

During the year, Management have executed all 
scheduled refinancings and have also refinanced 
a significant proportion of 2024 loans early.

 This year we 

have focused 
on enhancing, 
documenting and 
testing our internal 
controls and risk 
reviews through 
the implementation 
of a new digital 
platform. 

COMMITTEE MEMBERS’ 
ATTENDANCE DURING   
THE YEAR ENDED 
31 DECEMBER 2023

Elizabeth 
Edwards
Bill Holland
Denise Jagger
Eva Lindqvist

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notwithstanding the material uncertainty after 
due consideration, the Committee is therefore 
satisfied that the assessment of the going concern 
basis and statements made in connection with it 
are appropriate. In addition, having taken into 
account the key judgements made in relation to 
the going concern period, and the current 
progress on both the refinancings and sales, the 
Committee agreed that there is a reasonable 
expectation that the Group will be able to continue 
in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due 
and to continue as a going concern for the period 
to at least 31 July 2025.

Sustainability
Given the increased focus on sustainability 
from investors and tenants, we reviewed the 
sustainability data and assurance, looking at the 
sources of data for key reporting areas which had 
external or other forms of assurance and how 
these sources map to key submissions such as 
the Strategic Objective KPI, our Net Zero Carbon 
Pathway, GRESB and this Annual Report.

A new sustainability data platform is being 
implemented which will provide instant 
management information in relation to energy 
(and therefore carbon) consumption, and it will 
go live in April 2024. We noted some of the data 
issues centred around the automatic data link 
between the smart meter and the existing 
platform which were being resolved in time for 
the go-live date.

During 2023, we reviewed the scope and process 
for sustainability data assurance and concluded 
that, for the time being, it would remain separate 
to financial auditing.

Corporate Governance
We are closely monitoring the impact of the 
withdrawal of proposed legislation covering 
additional corporate and company reporting 
requirements. We will continue to monitor 
developments to ensure that CLS is thoroughly 
prepared for any future legislative or 
regulatory changes.

Cyber Risks
During the year, we received presentations from 
our Head of IT outlining the steps the Group had 
taken to reduce the potential for a cyber security 
incident. This included penetration testing, which 
showed that our security defences were 
sufficiently robust, and the IT training to assist 
employees in preventing risks entering our IT 
environment has been effective. Our Group’s 
SecurityScorecard rating remains at 96 (A rated), 
which places us in the top 2% of companies 
monitored by our cyber security partner.

Establishment and review of effectiveness 
of internal controls
The Board recognises that it is responsible for 
maintaining and monitoring the Group’s system of 
internal controls and reviewing its effectiveness. 
In order to do so, it is supported by the work of 
the Committee.

During the year, Management undertook a 
comprehensive internal controls testing programme 
covering financial and operational areas, and 
reviewed our risk analysis that had been 
documented on our CoreStream software. It was 
noted that whilst there were no major control 
failings, minor process improvements had been 
made as a result and the risks remained appropriate.

Key features of our system of internal control include:

•  a comprehensive system of financial reporting 

and business planning;

•  a defined schedule of matters for decision by the 
Board, revisited by the Board at least annually;
•  an organisational structure with clearly defined 

levels of authority and division of responsibilities;
•  formal documentation and approval procedures;
•  the close involvement of the Senior Leadership 
Team in all aspects of day-to-day operations, 
including regular meetings with line managers 
to review all operational aspects of the business 
and risk management systems;

•  annual Board review of Group strategy including 
forecasts of the Group’s future performance and 
progress against strategy;

•  formal sign-off on the Group’s Anti-Facilitation 

of Tax Evasion, Whistleblowing, Securities 
Dealing and Anti-bribery policies by all 
employees annually.

•  The programme of internal controls testing 

consisted of sample testing across the Group for 
the following processes:
 – Accounts payable: authorisations, approval 

limits, segregation of duties;

 – Accounts receivable; authorisations, approval 

limits, credit management; and

 – Payroll; access controls, reconciliations, 
authorisations and segregation of duties.

Financial reporting and significant 
financial judgements
Our consideration of the remaining significant 
judgements in the financial statements is set out on 
page 80 and includes property valuations, revenue 
recognition and management override of controls.

Bill Holland
Chair, Audit Committee

8 March 2024

OUR FOCUS FOR THE 
YEAR AHEAD

•  Ensure valuations 
and assumptions 
underpinning the 
valuations are 
appropriate 

•  Monitor principal 

and emerging risks 
to ensure the risk 
register remains 
appropriate and 
mitigations are 
in place

•  Review and monitor 
internal controls 
and receive regular 
updates on internal 
controls testing 
•  Receive regular 
reviews on the 
implementation of 
MRIx, a new property 
and finance software 
system, and 
Corestream, our 
risk management 
software

•  Foster a good 

working relationship 
with the external 
auditor, with a focus 
on the key issues 
outlined in each 
audit report during 
the year 

•  Monitor the impact 

of changes to 
accounting and 
governance laws 
and regulations 

•  Monitor sustainability 
data reporting and 
processes

77

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONAudit Committee Report continued

Main activities during the year
Principal responsibilities of the Committee

AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY

KEY AREAS DISCUSSED AND REVIEWED BY THE COMMITTEE DURING THE YEAR IN DISCHARGING ITS RESPONSIBILITIES

Monitoring the integrity 
of the financial 
statements and any 
formal announcements 
relating to financial 
performance, and 
reviewing significant 
financial reporting 
judgements contained 
in them

At our meetings in March 2024 and August 2023 we reviewed the full year and half-year results, respectively. This 
was in conjunction with the presentation of supporting external audit reports and reviews from EY, our external 
auditor, on those financial statements. Our discussions focused on the significant financial judgements which are 
explained in the next table.

In November 2023 the Company received a letter from the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) to say that it had 
reviewed the Company’s Annual Report and Financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2022. 

The FRC review was based solely on the annual report and accounts and does not benefit from detailed knowledge 
of our business or an understanding of the underlying transactions entered into. Their letter provided no assurance 
that the annual report and accounts are correct in all material respects, because the FRC’s role is not to verify the 
information provided to it but to consider compliance with reporting requirements.

We are pleased, however, that the FRC did not raise any material issues or ask any questions. The FRC did 
recommend some areas for improvement, including identifying the significant judgements to disclose in the 
financial statements, how we communicate alternative performance measures, disclosures of valuation techniques 
for equity investments and greater focus on areas of climate related disclosures.

The Audit Committee were grateful for the recommendations and have appropriately incorporated them into this 
year’s financial statements.

Providing advice on 
whether the annual 
report and accounts, 
taken as a whole, 
is fair, balanced and 
understandable, 
and providing the 
information necessary 
for shareholders to 
assess CLS’ position and 
performance, business 
model and strategy

We reviewed the 2023 annual report and accounts at our Committee meetings in February and March 2024 and 
reported our conclusions to the Board that they contained sufficient information for shareholders to assess the 
Group’s performance and strategic operations.

We also considered the Alternative Performance Measures (‘APMs’) that CLS uses alongside statutory figures and 
concluded that these should remain unchanged from last year and that these assist in providing stakeholders 
with additional useful information on the underlying trends, performance and position of the Group. Note 5 and the 
Supplementary disclosures to the financial statements give a full description and reconciliation of our APMs.

Additionally, having considered how the report was formulated, reviewed internally and by the external Auditor, 
we considered that the 2023 annual report and accounts meets the criteria set out in Provision 25 of the Code and 
recommended them to the Board. The Board’s statement is set out on page 103.

Reviewing our risks, risk 
management systems 
and internal financial 
controls

The Committee assists the Board in undertaking a robust assessment of the Group’s principal and emerging risks. 
It receives reports at its meetings which identify principal risks and any movements in them, which it then reviews 
and reports to the Board on its findings, for wider discussion and approval. The ways in which the Group’s principal 
and emerging risks are identified and addressed are set out on pages 51 to 53.

As explained above, during the year, in addition to reviewing the established framework for internal controls and 
risk management systems, the Committee received and discussed reports from management on the operation 
and testing of the Group’s internal controls.

We reviewed the overall status of the principal risks and uncertainties, the changes in risk profile in 2023, and the 
current direction of travel for 2024. It was noted that in 2023, the risk profiles remained largely unchanged. In regard 
to the current direction of travel of the risks faced, financing was deemed to be the sole risk that may increase 
throughout the year due to current uncertainties with the market, specifically around interest rates and inflation. We 
maintain robust controls which help to mitigate financing risk, through weekly treasury updates with Executives and 
maintaining strong relationships with over 26 lenders.

We also continued to monitor the roll-out of the Group’s new property and finance system, which is now live in the 
UK and France. German implementation is expected to be in Q3 2024. The system is now starting to provide the 
operational efficiencies expected, following a significant amount of testing and development. 

78

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCEAREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY

KEY AREAS DISCUSSED AND REVIEWED BY THE COMMITTEE DURING THE YEAR IN DISCHARGING ITS RESPONSIBILITIES

In light of the size and complexity of the Group, and the regular updates the Committee receives on internal controls 
testing, the Committee is confident that there remains no requirement for an in-house internal audit function. How 
assurance on internal controls is achieved is set out on page 77.

As a result of the tender process in 2021, EY were appointed as the Group’s external auditor following the 
publication of the Group’s final results and were formally appointed at the 2022 AGM. They were reappointed at the 
2023 AGM and will stand again for re-appointment at the 2024 AGM.

The Committee reviewed the fee for the 2023 audit at its meeting in November 2023 and confirmed that it 
was appropriate.

The Committee receives a report from the external auditor on their continued independence, contained in their 
reports at the full year and half year, and at the planning meeting in November. Following consideration, the 
Committee considers EY remains independent and objective in its external audit of the Group.

We reviewed EY’s reports on the external audit strategy and findings from the review of the half-yearly financial 
report and from the audit of the annual report and accounts. We found the reports to be comprehensive and 
sufficiently detailed and focused.

We also met with the auditor prior to the Board’s final approval of those financial statements in order to receive 
reports on the external audit process. The Committee is pleased to report that there were no issues of a material 
nature that needed to be brought to the Board’s attention.

After the external audit process has taken place the Committee meets with internal stakeholders to review the 
effectiveness of the external audit process. This is fed back to our external audit partner. We consider that EY provided 
an effective audit and that key accounting and auditing judgements had been identified and reported in line with 
regulatory and professional requirements. This allowed us to recommend their reappointment to the Board.

The Committee has developed a policy on the supply of non-audit services to safeguard auditor independence and 
objectivity. The policy reflects the requirements of the FRC’s ethical standard.

During the year non-audit services undertaken by the external auditor amounted to £76,000 (2022: £51,000) and 
related to the half-year review, which is considered to be an audit related assurance service, and the fee in relation 
to access to a knowledge database product owned by EY. The Committee concluded that the external auditor’s 
independence was not impaired.

The Committee considers that it has complied with the provisions of the Statutory Audit Services for Large 
Companies Market Investigation (Mandatory Use of Competitive Tender Processes and Audit Committee 
Responsibilities) Order 2014.

Monitoring and 
reviewing annually 
whether there is a need 
for an internal audit 
function and making 
a recommendation to 
the Board

Conducting the 
audit tender 
process and making 
recommendations 
to the Board, about 
the appointment, 
reappointment and 
removal of the external 
auditor, and approving 
the remuneration and 
terms of engagement 
of the external auditor

Reviewing and 
monitoring the external 
auditor’s independence 
and objectivity

Reviewing the 
effectiveness of the 
external audit process, 
taking into consideration 
relevant UK professional 
and regulatory 
requirements

Developing and 
implementing a policy 
on the engagement of 
the external auditor 
to supply non-audit 
services, ensuring 
there is prior approval 
of non-audit services, 
considering the 
impact this may have 
on independence, 
taking into account the 
relevant regulations and 
ethical guidance, and 
reporting to the Board 
on any improvement or 
action required

79

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONAudit Committee Report continued

Financial reporting and significant financial judgements

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
CONSIDERED BY THE 
COMMITTEE RELATING TO 
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Property valuations

HOW THESE ISSUES WERE ADDRESSED BY THE COMMITTEE

The Committee met with the Group’s UK, German and French valuers during the year and extended an invitation to 
the whole Board to attend. During the meeting we discussed the methodology used for the six monthly valuations 
of the Group’s properties and received in-depth reports on the local markets in which the properties were located. 
We discussed the risks and opportunities of the key properties in each location that were of significant value or had 
the largest changes in valuations to better understand our long-term plan for each property. Independently, the 
external auditor also met with the Group’s valuers using real estate specialists and provided the Committee with a 
summary of their review contained within their reports at the half-year and year end. 

The Committee was satisfied with the explanations provided by the valuers in relation to the portfolio and that 
the methodology, assumptions and judgements used were appropriate. The Committee recommended to the 
Board that the valuations were suitable for inclusion in the financial statements and the work of the auditor 
was appropriate.

Going concern and 
viability statements

As described above, the Committee considered management’s assessment of the Group’s going concern and 
viability statements.

Revenue recognition

In accordance with Provisions 30 and 31 of the UK Corporate Governance Code, our going concern and Viability 
Statements, and the methodology used in its preparation, can be found on pages 54 to 57.

The Committee considered the main areas of judgement exercised by management in accounting for revenue, 
including the treatment of rent, lease incentives and service charge income. The external auditor confirmed that 
they had audited the timing of revenue recognition, treatment of rents, service charge income, other property-
related income and lease incentives and assessed the risk of management override. Based on the audit 
procedures performed, they did not identify any matters to bring to the Committee’s attention. The Committee, 
having consulted with the external auditor, concurred with the judgements applied by management and was 
satisfied that revenue is appropriately recognised and reported.

Significant transactions

The Committee considered there to be no significant transactions during the year that were outside the ordinary 
course of business.

Management override 
of controls

The Committee assessed the framework for financial controls, which are regularly updated by management and 
brought to the Committee for review and approval. The Committee found no concerns arising from its review.

The external auditor performed planned audit procedures on the key areas which may be susceptible to 
management override. This included identifying fraud risks during the audit planning stages, making inquiries of 
management about risks of fraud and the associated controls, considering the effectiveness of management’s 
controls designed to address the risk of fraud and performing specific procedures regardless of identified risks, 
including journal entry testing. The external auditor confirmed to the Committee that they did not identify any 
matters that suggested there had been instances of management override during the year.

80

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCERemuneration Committee Report  
Aligning reward with performance 
in challenging times

Dear shareholder 

I am pleased to present the Report of the Remuneration 
Committee (the ‘Committee’) for the year ended 
31 December 2023. I joined the Committee on 
22 September 2023 and assumed the 
responsibility as Committee Chair on 1 January 
2024, taking over from Denise Jagger who had 
been Committee Chair since April 2020. I would 
like to thank Denise for her significant contribution 
as Committee Chair and for working with me on 
the content of this report and providing a very 
comprehensive handover. 

This report sets out the implementation of the 
Company’s current Directors’ Remuneration Policy 
(“Policy”) for the year ended December 2023, which 
was approved by 99.17% of shareholders at the 
Annual General Meeting held on 27 April 2023.

The sections contained in this report are: 

•  the Annual Statement from the Chair of the 

Remuneration Committee; and 

•  the Annual Report on Remuneration which 

explains how we have paid our Directors under 
the current Policy this year and how our framework 
aligns with our wider strategy and corporate 
governance best practice, as well as how we 
consider remuneration of the wider workforce 
in relation to executive pay.

As in previous years, the Annual Report on 
Remuneration and this Annual Statement are 
subject to a single advisory shareholder vote 
at the AGM, which will be held on 25 April 2024. 

Role of the Committee 
The Committee’s main purpose is to assist the 
Board in discharging its responsibilities for:

•  reviewing the overall remuneration policy for 
executive directors and senior management;
•  recommending and monitoring the level and 

structure of remuneration for executive 
directors and senior management; 
•  governing all share schemes; and 
•  reviewing any major changes in employee 

compensation and benefit structures 
throughout the Group. 

The Committee’s Terms of Reference, which 
are reviewed annually, are available on the 
Company’s website.

Membership and attendance 
At the year end, the Committee comprised 
three independent Directors and the Chair of 
the Board, who was independent on appointment. 
The Committee therefore complies with the 
provisions of the Code. 

As set out above, Denise stepped down from the 
Board and the Committee on 31 December 2023. 
I became Committee Chair on 1 January 2024.

During 2023, the Committee met three times and 
held a number of informal discussions with the 
Executive Directors and the full Board. We believe 
it is important that during the year the Committee 
keeps up-to-date to enable timely discussions 
where business decisions may affect remuneration.
Both myself and my predecessor met with 
our retained remuneration consultant, 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (‘PwC’), to discuss 
best practice generally and to ensure that we were 
updated on current and emerging thinking and that 
we were applying best practice. PwC also attended 
Committee meetings to share their experience and 
provide an update on wider remuneration trends as 
context for the Committee’s decision making.

 99% shareholder 

approval for our 
Policy shows close 
alignment to 
remuneration 
structures that 
support long-term 
performance. 

COMMITTEE MEMBERS’ 
ATTENDANCE DURING   
THE YEAR ENDED 
31 DECEMBER 2023

Denise Jagger

Bill Holland
Eva Lindqvist
Lennart Sten

81

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Remuneration Committee Report continued

Our continued focus on our tenants’ needs and 
on developing effective working relationships is 
delivering benefits in that we are able to deploy 
our in-house resource quickly and effectively as 
our tenants’ needs evolve.

Our 2022 final dividend was payable in May 2023 
and our 2023 interim dividend in October 2023. On 
both occasions, the Board carefully considered the 
overall performance of the Group and concluded 
that it was appropriate to pay the dividends in line 
with our existing dividend policy. Given the overall 
performance of the Group, the Board has decided 
to propose a maintained final 2023 dividend which, 
together with the interim dividend, results in a flat 
in the full year dividend, which is 1.30x covered by 
EPRA earnings. 

The Committee considered these efforts and 
achievements to ensure they were reflected 
in remuneration outcomes as set out below.

Annual Bonus key performance indicators 
EPRA EPS was 10.3 pence, which was on target, 
resulting in a bonus of 50% of the maximum 
available bonus for this element being achieved. 
This was driven by increased net rental income 
but offset by higher financing costs. 

Total Accounting Return, based on EPRA NTA, 
was -20.8%, and therefore below the threshold at 
which a bonus is earned. This was because NTA 
decreased from 329.6 pence per share to 253.0 
pence per share, almost entirely as a result of 
revaluation declines. This resulted in nil payout 
under this element. 

EPRA vacancy rate was 11.0%, which was below 
target but above the threshold at which a bonus 
is earned, resulting in a bonus of 34.4% of the 
maximum available bonus for this element being 
achieved. Although we also saw strong lettings 
demand across the existing portfolio with 
significant lease deals in all three countries, there 
were a large number of refurbishments made 
available to let during the year which resulted in 
the vacancy rate being higher than anticipated. 

2023 Remuneration Policy
This is the first year of the implementation of our 
new Policy. Following a successful consultation 
where my predecessor corresponded with a number 
of shareholders and shareholder representative 
bodies, we were pleased with its endorsement 
by 99.17% of shareholders at last year’s AGM. 
The changes we made were primarily aimed 
at supporting the Committee’s strategy whilst 
simplifying our remuneration structure and 
moving closer to established best practice for 
a company of our size and operation. 

2023 Group performance and outcomes
2023 has been exceptionally challenging for 
the real estate industry as a whole.

We have had to contend with a number  
of macro-economic events such as rising 
interest rates, the highest level of inflation 
in a generation and an emerging post-Covid 
landscape of continuing changes to expectations 
of employees and employers regarding attendance 
at a single place of work and hence levels of office 
use. Unsurprisingly, these significant macro 
events had an impact on the overall results 
of the Group and the achievement of KPIs. 

The Board’s focus for the executive team was 
to complete our refurbishment projects to a 
high standard, both in terms of fit out but also 
incorporating sustainability requirements, 
and continuing to drive lettings. We have been 
highly successful at securing additional rental 
income through lettings, which were ahead of ERV, 
and delivering our refurbishments to an excellent 
standard, which the Board has seen first-hand 
during property visits in Paris and London. 

During the year we were able to execute our 
planned refinancings ahead of schedule. We also 
successfully diversified our portfolio of loans with 
two revolving credit facilities. 

We have seen an increase in our lettings volume 
and index linked leases, which has increased our 
net rental income thereby off setting inflationary 
pressures, but our financing costs have also risen 
due to higher interest rates. The investment 
market has yet to return to pre-pandemic levels, 
which has caused some delays in the sale of some 
properties and as a result we also continue to 
pause acquisitions.  Equally, we have not been 
immune from the declines seen in property values  
across the real estate sector over the course of 
the year, but it is clear that our teams have been 
doing all they can to mitigate that impact.

82

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCEESG SPECIFIC 
PERFORMANCE

OPERATIONAL

DIGITISATION

The Strategic Objective measure was reviewed 
and performance assessed by the Committee 
as set out below.

As reported in the sustainability report, the Group 
exceeded its target to reduce carbon emissions 
and energy use in line with the Net Zero Carbon 
(“NZC”) pathway model by 4% (like for like). 
The Group also completed all of the planned 
photovoltaic (“PV”) installation projects across 
the portfolio. 

The Group successfully executed all of its key 
Treasury objectives in this area.

The Group is undergoing a transformative 
information system upgrade and has already 
successfully implemented it in the UK and France. 
The focus of this objective was to implement 
the system in Germany and Luxembourg. 
This objective was substantially complete; 
the implementation was delayed as we wait for 
necessary system changes from the third party 
provider and to ensure that the resultant system 
is implemented to the required standard. 
The Committee noted that this delay was outside 
of management’s control.

Following discussion, the Committee agreed that 
in the round the Executive Director’s performance 
against the strategic objectives had been 
excellent, such that it approved to award 100% 
of the maximum available bonus for this element. 

The Committee determined that, taken as a whole, 
the attainment against our annual bonus KPIs 
broadly reflected the performance of the Group 
and the associated shareholder experience. We 
also noted that some external factors (outside 
management’s control) had impacted the ability 
to achieve the stretching targets which had been 
set at the start of the year. For example, the extent 
to which macro elements such as the decline in 
property values during the year, impacted the NTA, 
and the speed at which interest rates increased 
during the year, and impacted our EPS 
performance.  Taking these factors into account, 
the Committee concluded that no discretionary 
adjustment was warranted in relation to the 
formulaic outcome from the annual bonus scheme.

As a result, the overall bonus outcome for the 
CEO was £345,824 and CFO was £184,925, 
representing 46.9% of the maximum potential 
bonus. In line with Policy, the Executive Director’s 
annual bonus will be paid in cash on the basis 
they are below 100% of salary. See page 88 for 
breakdown of the amounts.

Performance Incentive Plan – Element A (run off)
Following the introduction of the new Policy, this 
scheme is now in run off and no further contributions 
are being made. As confirmed in last year’s 
Remuneration Report, 50% of the balance will 
be paid out in respect of plan year 3 (2023) and 
the remaining balance in respect of plan year 4, 
(2024). The value of notional shares in the Bonus 
Pool, which is linked to share price performance, 
fell by 36%, resulting in a reduction in its value 
for the CEO of £38,956 and CFO of £15,904. 
This resulted in a payout of £37,458 and £15,292 
for the CEO and CFO respectively.

LTIPs
The 2020 LTIP Awards were granted on 13 May 
2020 and performance was assessed over a 
3 year period ending on 31 December 2022. 
As reported last year, the relative TSR element 
was below median and therefore resulted in nil 
vesting under this element of the award. The 
relative EPRA NTA per share was between median 
and upper quartile and therefore resulted in a 
59.7% vesting under this element of the award. 
The overall vesting for the 2020 LTIP was 29.9%. 
The Committee considered that the formulaic 
vesting outcome reflected the underlying 
performance of the Company and that no windfall 
gains were made.

The 2021 LTIP Awards were granted on 10 March 
2021 and performance was assessed over a 3 
year period ending on 31 December 2023. CLS’ 
TSR was below median and therefore resulted in 
nil vesting under this element of the award. The 
final assessment against the relative EPRA NTA 
per share performance condition is pending as 
this can only be considered when all comparator 
group companies have published their 2023 
EPRA NTA per share figures. When available, the 
Committee will assess the achievement against 
the performance targets under both measures to 
determine the final vesting level. As part of this 
process, the Committee will consider whether the 
formulaic vesting outcome is a fair and appropriate 
reflection of the underlying performance of the 
Company including whether any windfall gains 
have been made.

The fourth grant under the LTIP was made in 
March 2023, with the same award levels as in 
2022 at 150% of salary for the CEO and 120% of 
salary for the CFO. This was below the maximum 
level permissible under the new Policy (200% of 
salary), recognising the reduction in share price 
since the 2022 grant. The Committee will review 
whether there has been any windfall gains upon 
vesting in 2026 and make appropriate adjustments 
at that time if this is the case. 

83

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONRemuneration Committee Report continued

For completeness here, we note that the 92,401 
shares granted to the CEO and 26,358 shares 
granted to the CFO in 2020 under Element B 
of the PIP vested on 5 March 2023. No further 
awards vest for either participant under this plan.

Discretion 
The Committee confirms that it did not exercise 
discretion in relation to the formulaic outcomes 
of the 2023 annual bonus, the PIP Element A 
run off or the 2020 LTIP award. 

Implementation of Policy for 2024
Salary increase
In line with our Policy, the Committee reviewed 
base salaries for the Executive Directors against 
the relevant comparator groups and considered 
what was appropriate given the current economic 
environment and increases awarded to our 
general employee population. As a result, a 3% 
uplift was awarded to both Fredrik Widlund 
and Andrew Kirkman, mirroring the percentage 
increase awarded to the wider workforce. 
The increases will apply from 1 January 2024.

Variable pay
The award levels under the annual bonus remain 
unchanged at 150% of salary and 125% of salary 
for the CEO and CFO respectively. 

Reflecting on the current economic climate and 
the fall in CLS’ share price since the grant of the 
2023 LTIP, the Committee has determined that this 
would not be an appropriate time to increase the 
LTIP award towards the Policy maximum of 200% 
of salary. Therefore, the 2024 LTIP awards will 
remain unchanged at 150% and 120% of salary 
for the CEO and CFO respectively. This will be kept 
under review for 2025 and, as reported previously, 
the Committee intends to use the approved Policy 
increase only when this is appropriate. 

Performance Measures 
The Committee reviewed the 2024 performance 
measures for the annual bonus and LTIP, and 
proposed a reweighting of the annual bonus 
metrics as set out below: 

•   EPRA EPS – 40% weighting (no change) 
•   Total Accounting Return (based on EPRA 
NTA) – 15% weighting (previously 20%) 

•   EPRA vacancy rate – 25% weighting 

(previously 20%) 

•  Strategic objectives (including ESG) – 

20% weighting (no change) 

The Remuneration Committee acknowledges 
the difficulty in setting annual bonus targets in 
such a volatile economic environment and the 

weighting of the TAR measure has been reduced 
to reflect this and the continued uncertainty 
regarding property valuations. Due to the pause 
in acquisitions, the Board expects growth over 
2024 to be predominantly organic, with greater 
emphasis on ensuring higher occupancy during 
the year. As a result, the weighting of the EPRA 
vacancy has been increased. The Committee will 
review the balance of measures again for 2025.

The strategic performance element in 
the annual bonus provides flexibility to set 
objectives for the CEO and CFO, against which 
the Committee will assess performance using 
a combination of quantitative and qualitative 
measures. The strategic performance element 
also links the Executive Directors’ pay to ESG 
objectives which both reflects broader investor 
views and ensures that the Executive Directors 
are rewarded for effective delivery against the 
company’s ESG strategy. 

There are no changes to the weightings of the 
LTIP metrics at 35% on Relative TSR and 65% 
on Relative EPRA NTA per share growth. 
The FTSE350 Supersector Real Estate Index 
(excluding certain companies which are less 
directly comparable) remains the benchmark 
against which both measures are assessed. 

Corporate governance 
Over 2023 and previous years, we have taken 
the following steps: 

•  Overseen the implementation of our 

Remuneration Policy so that it remains aligned 
with best practice and designed to encourage 
long-term value creation for shareholders; 
•  Reviewed our terms of reference to ensure 
the Committee has appropriate oversight of 
the Directors’ and senior management’s pay as 
well as the operation of reward arrangements 
throughout the organisation;

•   Reviewed pension levels for Executive 

Directors to ensure that these were aligned 
with the wider workforce;

•   Implemented a post-employment shareholding 
requirement such that the minimum shareholding 
requirement must be retained for two years 
post cessation, with a mechanism in place to 
enforce this; and

•   Assessed workforce pay policies and practices 
to ensure that they are aligned to our wider 
culture and remain an effective driver of Group 
success. The Committee continues to review 
and monitor governance developments and 
market context regularly in order to ensure 
the appropriateness of our reward and 
remuneration policies. 

84

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCEConcluding remarks 
The Group has continued to face headwinds as 
a result of the current economic climate and in 
this context the Committee believe that Executive 
Director pay outcomes are reflective of the results 
contained in this annual report.  We believe our 
approach to pay aligns with the Company’s 
strategies of growing profitability and delivering 
appropriate returns. We trust that this report 
will answer any questions you may have in 
respect of remuneration, and we would be glad 
to receive your support at the 2024 AGM 
in respect of the advisory vote on the Annual 
Report on Remuneration. 

Finally, I want to recognise that the Company’s 
performance would not be possible without the 
hard work shown by our employees during these 
challenging times. To all staff – thank you for your 
dedication and commitment to making CLS the 
strong business it remains today. 

Eva Lindqvist 
Chair, Remuneration Committee 
8 March 2024

OUR FOCUS FOR  
THE YEAR AHEAD

•  Oversee the 

implementation of 
the Remuneration 
Policy in relation 
to the Executive 
Directors and the 
workforce generally 
•  Monitor performance 

against KPIs 

•  Continue to ensure 
consistency of 
approach and fair 
pay conditions across 
the Group and seek 
expert advice and 
market data to 
inform decisions 
•   Ensure Company 
performance is 
appropriately 
reflected in any 
performance-related 
pay element of 
remuneration 
•   Receive updates 

from HR in relation 
to developments in 
employee benefit 
structures to 
ensure compliance 
with the Code

Performance of the Committee 
The Committee undertakes a review of its 
performance each year. During 2023, this review 
was undertaken externally by way of a questionnaire 
and concluded that the Committee continued to 
perform effectively and had unfettered access to the 
information and advice it needed to make informed 
decisions on all matters related to remuneration.

Advisors to the Remuneration Committee 
To ensure that the Group’s remuneration practices 
are in line with best practice, the Committee’s 
independent external remuneration advisors are 
PwC. PwC attends meetings of the Committee 
by invitation. 

During the year, the Committee sought advice 
from PwC in relation to emerging issues and 
development of best practice as well as 
specifically in the application of our own policies 
related to remuneration. On occasion, the CEO 
and COO were invited to parts of Remuneration 
Committee meetings to hear from PwC about the 
broader landscape and trends in executive pay 
and emerging practices, and respond to questions 
from the Committee.

Such attendances excluded any matter concerning 
their own remuneration. The Company Secretary 
acts as secretary to the Committee. 

PwC is one of the founding members of the 
Remuneration Consultants Group Code of Conduct 
and adheres to this Code in its dealings with the 
Committee. The Committee reviews the objectivity 
and independence of the advice it receives from 
PwC at a private meeting each year. It is satisfied 
that PwC is providing independent, robust and 
professional advice. The fees for the advice 
provided by PwC in 2023 were £131,250 excluding 
VAT which were an increase on the previous year 
(2022: £122,000) due to additional services around 
our policy review and renewal. Going forwards 
they will fall and be subject to a fixed scope and 
fee, particularly in years of no review.

85

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONRemuneration Committee Report continued

Linking our 2023 Remuneration Policy to our Strategy 

COMPANY STRATEGY 

We acquire the right properties
•  Invest in high-yielding 

properties, predominantly 
offices, with a focus on 
cash returns

We secure the right finance
•   Target a low cost of debt
•   Utilise diversified sources 
of finance to reduce risk
•  Maintain high level of liquid 

•  Diversify market risk by 

resources

investing in geographical areas 
with differing characteristics

We deliver value through active 
management and cost control
•  Maintain high occupancy 

rates

•   Maintain a diversified customer 
base underpinned by a strong 
core income stream

•   Maintain strict cost control

We continually assess whether 
to hold or sell properties 
•   Focus on holding those 

properties with the potential 
to add value through active 
asset management

•   Sell those properties which 
are low yielding or where 
the risk/reward ratio is 
unfavourably balanced

We reward shareholders, 
customers and employees
•   Grow dividend in line 
with growth of the 
business

•  Provide cost effective 
acommodation by 
investing profits back 
into the business

•  Reward employees for 
their work and loyalty

REMUNERATION  
PRINCIPLES

OUR GROUP STRATEGY INFORMS OUR REMUNERATION PRINCIPLES AND OUR STRUCTURE SUPPORTS 
THESE OBJECTIVES

COMPETITIVE

•  Salaries are targeted to be at a conservative level and variable 

pay is targeted at above median so that combined, total remuneration 
should be competitive when compared with companies of similar size 
and scale, i.e. peers in the FTSE 350/Small Cap real estate sector.
•  LTIP ensures more competitive market positioning, provided that 
the executive team delivers long-term sustainable performance.

PERFORMANCE 
LINKED

•  A significant part of the Executive Directors’ reward is determined 

by the Company’s success in delivering its strategy.

•  Failure to achieve threshold levels of annual and long-term 

performance may result in no bonus and/or no vesting of the LTIP.
•  The fixed element of the Policy remains conservative against industry 

and sector peers.

•  The Committee retains discretion to adjust pay outcomes if they do not 

reflect wider business performance in line with best practice.

SHAREHOLDER 
ALIGNED 

•  A considerable part of the reward is paid in shares combined 

with significant shareholding requirements.

•  Annual bonus over 100% of salary will be deferred in shares 
and vest after 3 years subject to continued employment.

•  In the case of the LTIP, deferral applies over a period of 5 years 
from grant. This allows the build up and retention of meaningful 
shareholdings by the Executive Directors.

•  Post-employment shareholding requirement increases lock-in over 
longer term and incentivises effective long-term decision making.

Link to Code Provision 
40 factors: 
•   Alignment to culture.
•   Proportionality.

Link to Code Provision 
40 factors: 
•   Predictability.
•   Alignment to culture.

Link to Code Provision 
40 factors: 
•   Risk.
•   Alignment to culture.
•   Clarity.

SIMPLE AND 
TRANSPARENT 

•  All aspects of the remuneration structure are clear to participants and 

openly communicated.

•  The annual bonus is aligned to market practice.
•  The LTIP is also aligned to standard market practice and simple 

Link to Code Provision 
40 factors: 
•   Simplicity.
•   Clarity.

to understand.

•  The overall framework for remuneration is therefore aligned 

with good governance.

OUR CHOSEN INCENTIVE PLAN MEASURES CLEARLY SUPPORT THE COMPANY STRATEGY

ANNUAL BONUS (2023)

EPRA Earnings Per Share (40%)

Total Accounting 
Return (20%)

EPRA Vacancy rate (20%)

Strategic Objective (20%)

LTIP

86

Relative Total Shareholder Return  
(35%)

Relative EPRA NTA growth per share (65%)

OUR CHOSEN INCENTIVE PLAN MEASURES CLEARLY SUPPORT THE COMPANY STRATEGY AND CULTURE,  
WHILST BEING MARKET CONSISTENT

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCEAligning our 2023 Remuneration Policy with provision 40 of the 2018 UK 
Corporate Governance Code
The Code requires the Committee to determine the Policy and practices for Executive Directors in line with a number of factors set 
out in Provision 40. The following table sets out how the Remuneration Committee’s Policy is intended to be implemented in 2024, 
aligns with Provision 40 of the Code. The objective is to ensure that the remuneration policy operated by the Company is aligned to 
all stakeholder interests including those of shareholders.

Provision 40 factor

How the Policy aligns with the factor

Clarity – remuneration arrangements 
should be transparent and promote 
effective engagement with shareholders 
and the workforce.

Simplicity – remuneration structures 
should avoid complexity and their 
rationale and operation should be 
easy to understand.

Risk – remuneration arrangements 
should ensure reputational and other 
risks from excessive rewards, and 
behavioural risks that can arise from 
target-based incentive plans, are 
identified and mitigated.

Predictability – the range of possible 
values of rewards to individual Directors 
and any other limits or discretions should 
be identified and explained at the time of 
approving the policy.

Proportionality – the link between 
individual awards, the delivery of 
strategy and the long-term performance 
of the Company should be clear.

Outcomes should not reward 
poor performance.

Alignment to culture – incentive 
schemes should drive behaviours 
consistent with Company purpose, 
values and strategy.

•  The Company’s performance-linked remuneration is based on supporting the 
implementation of the Company’s strategy as measured through its core KPIs. 
There is transparency over the performance metrics in place for both the annual 
bonus and the LTIP, and there is a clear link between long-term value creation and 
the provision of reward to Executive Directors and senior management.

•  The operation of the structures is made clear in the Directors’ Remuneration Report.

•  Market aligned annual bonus plan is of a standard structure, is simple and its operation 

is well understood.

•  The LTIP is a market standard structure which is familiar to participants and 

shareholders alike.

•  The Policy includes:

 – setting defined limits on the maximum awards which can be earned;
 – requiring the deferral of a substantial proportion of the incentives in shares 

for a material period of time;

 – aligning the performance conditions with the strategy of the Company;
 – ensuring a focus on long-term sustainable performance through the LTIP; and
 – ensuring there is sufficient flexibility to adjust payments through malus and 
clawback and an overriding discretion to depart from formulaic outcomes.

•  These elements mitigate against the risk of target-based incentives by:

 – limiting the maximum value that can be earned;
 – deferring the value in shares for the long-term which helps ensure that the performance 
earning the award was sustainable and thereby discouraging short term behaviours;

 – aligning any reward to the agreed strategy of the Company;
 – ensuring that the use of an LTIP supports a focus on the sustainability of the 

performance over the longer term;

 – providing an opportunity to reduce or cancel the awards if the behaviours giving rise 

to the awards were inappropriate; and

 – providing an opportunity to reduce or cancel the awards, if it appears that the criteria on 
which the award was based do not reflect the underlying performance of the Company.

•  The Remuneration Committee has a good line of sight and control over the potential 

performance outcomes, and the actual and perceived value of the incentives.

•  The Policy sets out the potential remuneration available in a number of performance 

scenarios on page 162 of 2022 annual report.

•  One of the key strengths of the approach of the Company to remuneration is the direct 

link between the Company strategy and the value received by Executives.

•  The Company has clearly articulated the potential reward to the Executives compared 

to the value that has to be delivered to shareholders for that reward to be earned.

•  Our KPI measures linked to annual bonus outcomes mean pay fluctuates 

with performance.

•  The LTIP rewards long-term sustainable performance in an inherently cyclical market.
•  This focus on long-term sustainable value is a key tenet of the Company’s strategy and 

its culture and values.

•  The Strategic objectives, including ESG measures, within the bonus supports company 

purpose in relation to its ESG strategy.

•  Executive directors remuneration outcomes are considered in the context of outcomes 

across the wider workforce.

•  The Committee is committed to fair pay across the workforce.

87

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONRemuneration Committee Report continued

Annual Report on Remuneration

Our overall structure is as follows and the outcomes are set out below:

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Fixed pay

Salary, Pension 
and Benefits

Annual bonus 

KPI driven outcomes

Payment will be in cash up to 100% of salary and any balance over 
100% of salary will be deferred into shares and vest after 3 years, 
subject to continued employment

LTIP

3-year performance period

2-year post-vesting holding period

Unless otherwise stated, narrative and tables are unaudited

Single total figure for Executive Directors’ remuneration (Audited)
The following table shows an analysis of remuneration in respect of qualifying services for the 2022 and 2023 financial years for 
each Executive Director:

2023

Executive 
Director

Fredrik 
Widlund1

Andrew 
Kirkman2

2022

Executive Director

Fredrik 
Widlund1

Andrew 
Kirkman2

Bonus 
£0003

Salary  
£000

Taxable 
benefits 
£0005

Cash  
£000

Deferred 
shares  
£000

LTIP 
£0004

Pension  
£000 

Other fees 
£0006

Total rem  
£000

Total fixed 
£0007

541

340

5

7

349

186

–

–

35

14

–

7

22

7

952

561

546

354

Bonus (PIP) 
£0003

Salary  
£000

Taxable 
benefits
 £0005

Cash  
£000

Deferred 
shares  
£000

LTIP 
£0004

Pension  
£000 

Other fees 
£0006

Total rem  
£000

Total fixed 
£0007

532

322

5

7

69

28

–

–

211

100

–

4

18

– 

835

461

537

333

Total 
variable 
£0000

406

207

Total 
variable 
£0008

298

128

1    Mr Widlund would have received total pension contributions of £49,183 (2022: £48,300). In accordance with the Policy, the entire amount was paid as a salary 

supplement (this element of salary is not bonusable or pensionable). 

2    Mr Kirkman would have received total pension contribution of £31,560 (2022: £29,567). In accordance with the Policy, £24,060 (2022: £24,610) was paid as salary 

supplement and £7,499 (2022: £4,000) was paid to his SIPP (this element of salary is not bonusable or pensionable). 

3    The Bonus total for 2023 includes all bonus earned during 2023 under the Policy, which is paid in cash up to 100% of salary, with any additional bonus deferred into 

shares for 3 years: Mr Widlund £345,824; Mr Kirkman £184,925. Includes 50% of the dividends attributable to deferred shares during the year under PIP A Account: Mr 
Widlund £2,807; Mr Kirkman £1,146. 

4    The 2022 and 2023 LTIP columns consist of 50% of the value of the opening balance of deferred notional shares under PIP A Account. This approach reflects the fact 

that this value is subject to forfeiture over the remaining life of the PIP cycle. The value of the notional shares under Element A has been based on the average market 
value of a share for the 30-day period to 31 December of £1.533 for 2022 and £0.981 for 2023 in accordance with the rules of the PIP . The 2022 LTIP column has also 
been restated to include the 2020 LTIP awards vesting value (see “LTIP in single figure calculation” on page 92).

5   Taxable Benefits relate to the provision of private medical insurance.
6   Other fees relate to: Mr Widlund: £21,160 (2022: £17,767) in respect of the dividend equivalents following the vesting of Mr Widlund’s 2020 Element B Award and £1,076 
(2022: £1,425) in respect of Mr Widlund’s Matching Shares that vested during the year under the All Employee Share Incentive Plan. Mr Kirkman: £6,036 (2022: nil) in 
respect of the dividend equivalents following the vesting of Mr Kirkman’s 2020 Element B Award and £1,371 (2022: £499) in respect of Mr Kirkman’s Matching Shares 
that vested during the year under the All Employee Share Plan.

7   Total fixed column is the total of salary, pension and benefits.
8   Total variable column is the total of bonus cash and deferred shares, LTIP and other fees.

88

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCEAnnual Bonus Plan (audited)
The table below sets out the annual opportunity and outcomes for the Executive Directors.

Maximum Bonus award (% salary) in 2023

Maximum Bonus award (£) in 2023

KPIs achievement as % of maximum 

Bonus as a % of 2023 salary

Total Bonus based on achievement above

Bonus payable in cash (maximum 100% of salary)

Bonus deferred into shares (where bonus is over 100% of salary)

A breakdown of the KPI achievements are set out below:

CEO

150%

CFO

125%

£737,757

£394,506

46.9%

70.3%

46.9%

58.6%

£345,824

£184,925

£345,824

£184,925

Nil

Nil

 Threshold 
performance 
(25% payout)

On Target 
Performance 
(50% payout)

Good 
Performance 
(75% payout)

Weighting

Maximum 
Performance 
(100% 
payout)

2023 
Achievement 

% of 
maximum 
earned 

CEO

CFO

40%

20%

20%

20%

100%

9.53p

10.30p

11.07p

11.85p

10.3p

50.0% £147,551

£78,901

(5.20)%

(2.60)%

12.80%

8.00%

0.00%

6.40%

2.60%

4.80%

(20.8)%

0%

£0

£0

11.0%

34.4%

£50,721

£27,122

Assessed by Remuneration Committee  
(see details below)

100% £147,551

£78,901

£345,824

£184,925

2023 KPI

EPRA EPS

Total Accounting Return*

EPRA Vacancy rate

Strategic Objective

Total

*  Based on EPRA NTA.

Assessment of strategic objectives
The new Strategic Objective was reviewed and performance assessed by the Committee as set out below. 

•  ESG specific performance

 As reported in the sustainability report, the Group exceeded its target to reduce carbon emissions and energy use in line with 
the Net Zero Carbon (“NZC”) pathway model by 4% (like for like). The Group also completed all of the planned PV projects across 
the portfolio. 

•   Operational

 The Group successfully executed all of its key Treasury objectives in this area, with all 2023 refinancings completed and 
additional credit facilities implemented.

•   Digitisation 

 The Group is undergoing a transformative information system upgrade and has already successfully implemented it in the UK 
and France. The focus of this objective was to implement the system in Germany and Luxembourg. The implementation was 
delayed as we wait for necessary system changes from the third party provider and to ensure that the resultant system is 
implemented to the required standard. The Committee was comfortable that this delay was outside of management’s control.

Following discussion, the Committee agreed that in the round the Executive Director’s performance against the strategic objectives 
had been excellent, such that it approved to award 100% of the maximum available bonus for this KPI.

The Committee determined that the achievement of the annual bonus targets reflected the underlying performance of the Group 
and therefore did not exercise any discretion to change the formulaic outcome. 

89

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
 
 
Remuneration Committee Report continued

Performance Incentive Plan (PIP) – 2023 Element A (run off)
The schematic below illustrates the ongoing operation of PIP Element A in run-off:

Year

Cycle 4

2021

2022

2023

2024

1st year 

2nd year

3rd year

4th year

As set out in the Policy, with the introduction of the Annual Bonus Plan, no further contributions will be made to the PIP Element A. 
In line with the rules of the scheme, 50% of the balance will be released at the end of 2023 and the remaining balance at the end 
of 2024.

The following table sets out for cycle 4, the PIP Element A Accounts for the participants and shows the number of deferred notional 
shares which formed the opening balance at 1 January 2023 and their opening value, the payments from the accounts in respect 
of 2023 and the value of the notional shares as at 31 December 2023.

PIP Plan Element A Accounts (cycle 4)

Number of deferred notional shares in Account at the start of Year 3

Value of deferred notional shares at the start of year 31

Change in value of deferred notional shares

Value of deferred notional shares at end of year 3 

Plus dividends attributable to deferred notional shares during year 3

Cumulative Account 

Less: 2023 payment out of the Account

Value of deferred notional shares carried forward into Year 4 

Number of deferred notional shares carried forward into Year 42, 3

CEO

CFO

70,616

28,829

£108,258

£44,197

£(38,956)

£(15,904)

£69,302

£28,293

£5,614

£2,292

£74,916

£30,585

£37,458

£15,292

£37,458

£15,292

38,168

15,582

1    The price used to calculate the opening value of shares was the average mid-market value of a share for the 30-day period to 31 December 2022,which was £1.533 per share.
2    The price used to calculate the closing value of shares was the average mid-market value of a share for the 30-day period to 31 December 2023, which was £0.981 per share.
3    In the context of the operation of the PIP Element A, the deferred notional shares is a mechanism that allows the deferred cash element of the award to be linked to the 

share price. The Committee confirms that there is no intention to issue actual shares.

Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
Vesting outcome for 2020 LTIP award (audited)
The 2020 LTIP Awards were granted on 13 May 2020 with targets based on CLS’ performance versus the constituent companies 
of the FTSE 350 Supersector Real Estate Index under two equally weighted measures: Relative Total Shareholder Return growth 
(“TSR”) and Relative EPRA Net Tangible Asset growth per share (“EPRA NTA per share”) both assessed over 3 years ending on 
31 December 2022.

As explained in the 2022 Annual Report, the final assessment against the relative EPRA NTA per share performance condition 
was pending as it could only be considered when all comparator group companies had published their 2022 EPRA NTA per share 
figures. This assessment was undertaken by the Committee during the year and the final outcomes against both performance 
targets were as follows:

•   The relative TSR performance was below median and therefore resulted in nil vesting under this element of the award. 
•   The relative EPRA NTA per share performance was between median and upper quartile and therefore resulted in a 59.7% 

vesting under this element of the award.

Full details are set out below:

Measure

Relative TSR growth

Relative EPRA NTA per share growth 

Vesting of LTIP (as a % of maximum)

90

Performance target

Actual performance

Weighting 

Median  
(25% vesting)

(18.4)% 

(8.2)%

50%

50%

100%

Upper 
quartiles  
(100% 
vesting)

(4.9)%

11.7%

CLS 
performance

LTIP vesting 
outcome of 
element 

(42.2)%

nil

1.0%

59.7%

n/a

LTIP vesting 
outcome 
after 
weighting 

nil

29.85%

29.85%

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCEThe Committee considered that the formulaic vesting outcome fairly reflected the underlying performance of the Company and 
that no windfall gains were made, such that it approved vesting of 29.85%. The LTIP value for 2022 has been restated in line with 
the table below: 

Executive 
Director

Fredrik 
Widlund 

Andrew 
Kirkman

Date of Grant

Shares 
awarded 

Vesting % 

Number of 
shares vesting 

Dividend 
equivalent 
shares

Value of 
shares 
vesting*

Value 
attributable 
to share price 
appreciation 

13 May 
2020

13 May 
2020

379,918

29.85%

113,405

20,522

£171,694

185,737

29.85%

55,442

10,033

£83,939

Nil

Nil

Vesting date

End of holding 
period

13 May 
2023

13 May 
2023

13 May 
2025

13 May 
2025

*  Value based on closing price on 13 May 2023 of £1.282 per share.

Vesting outcome for 2021 LTIP award (audited)
The 2021 LTIP Awards were granted on 10 March 2021. CLS’ performance is measured against the constituent companies of the 
FTSE 350 Supersector Real Estate Index under the same two equally weighted measures as the 2020 awards: Relative TSR and 
Relative EPRA NTA per share.

The relative TSR element was assessed over a 3 year performance period ending on 31 December 2023. CLS’s TSR growth was 
below median and therefore this resulted in nil vesting for this element, as set out in the table below.

The final assessment against the relative EPRA NTA per share performance condition is pending as this can only be considered 
when all comparator group companies have published their 2023 EPRA NTA per share figures. When available, the Committee 
will assess the achievement against the performance targets under both measures to determine the final vesting level of the 
2021 awards. In line with the Company’s shareholder approved remuneration policy, the Committee will also consider whether 
the formulaic 2021 LTIP vesting outcome fairly reflected the underlying performance of the Company, including the consideration 
of windfall gains having arisen, before determining final vesting.

As explained above, the vesting outcomes in the tables below only relate to the relative TSR element. The final vesting outcome 
will be presented in the 2024 annual report on remuneration:

Measure

Relative TSR growth

Relative EPRA NTA 
per share growth 

Vesting of LTIP (as 
a % of maximum)

Executive Director

Fredrik Widlund 

Andrew Kirkman

Performance target

Actual performance

Weighting  Median (25% vesting)

Upper quartiles  
(100% vesting)

CLS  
performance

LTIP vesting  
outcome of element 

LTIP vesting outcome 
after weighting 

(0.3)% 

tbc

50%

50%

100%

6.8%

tbc

n/a

(48.5)%

tbc

nil

tbc

nil

tbc

tbc

Shares 
awarded 

Estimated 
Vesting 
percentage 

Estimated 
Number 
of shares 
vesting 

Estimated 
value of 
shares 
vesting 

Estimated 
value 

attributable  Vesting date

End of 
holding 
period

314,899

153,955

tbc

tbc

tbc

tbc

tbc

tbc

10 March 
2024

10 March 
2026

10 March 
2024

10 March 
2026

tbc

tbc

Date of Grant

10 March 
2021

10 March 
2021

91

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONRemuneration Committee Report continued

Reconciliation of LTIP with single figure table for 2023

LTIP in single figure table 

Comprising 50% of the opening balance of the PIP Element A account from cycle 4

Value of LTIP due to share price increase/(decrease)

Estimated Value of 2021 LTIP Award1

Total LTIP

CEO

CFO

£54,129

£22,098

£(19,478)

£(7,952)

Nil

Nil

£34,651

£14,146

1.  Estimated value of the 2021 LTIP awards only includes the Relative TSR element as the Relative EPRA Net Asset per share target has not yet been assessed.

Restatement of LTIP single figure for 2022

LTIP in single figure table

Comprising 50% of the opening balance of the PIP Element A account from cycle 4

Value of LTIP due to share price increase/(decrease)

Value of vested 2020 LTIP Award1

Total LTIP

1.  2020 LTIP vesting value as per section above.

CEO

CFO

£54,554

£22,226

£(15,011)

£(6,115)

£171,694

£83,939

£211,237

£100,050

LTIP awards granted in 2023
The 2023 LTIP awards were granted on 13 March 2023 in the form of nil-cost options. In line with the previous Policy, the awards 
had a face value of 150% of base salary for the CEO and 120% for the CFO. The normal vesting date of the LTIP Awards will be 
13 March 2026, being the third anniversary of the award date. Dividend equivalents will be payable on vested shares. On 
completion of the vesting period, assuming that awards vest, they will be subject to a further two-year holding period. 

The award levels were significantly below the maximum level that is permissible under the new Policy (200% of salary), recognising 
the reduction in share price since the 2022 LTIP grant. In addition, the outcome will be reviewed at vesting to ensure no windfall 
gains have occurred as a result of changes in the share price between the grant and vesting.

As set out in the table below, the number of shares granted under the award was calculated using a share price of £1.374, being 
the quoted closing price of the Company’s Ordinary Share on 10 March 2023.

Scheme interests awarded under the LTIP (audited)

Name

Fredrik 
Widlund 

Andrew 
Kirkman 

Role

Base salary at 
date of grant 

Face value of 
2023 LTIP award 
(% of base 
salary)

Face value of 
2023 LTIP award

Value at vesting 
(threshold 
vesting of 25%

Number of 
shares granted 

CEO

£491,838

150%

£737,757

£184,439

536,941

CFO

£315,605

120%

£378,726

£94,682

275,637

Vesting date

13 March 
2026

13 March 
2026

End of holding 
period 

13 March 
2028

13 March 
2028

The LTIP awards will vest based on the satisfaction of the following performance conditions which are each measured over 
a three year period ending on 31 December 2025:

Award vesting2 (% maximum)

Threshold

Maximum

25%

100%

Total Shareholder Return relative to selected1 FTSE 350 Real Estate Super Sector Constituents (35%)

Median Upper Quartile

EPRA NTA growth per share relative to selected1 FTSE 350 Real Estate Super Constituents (65%)

Median Upper Quartile

1.   The Committee refined its approach to the peer group for both metrics, such that it continues to be based on the FTSE350 Supersector Real Estate Index but 

now excludes certain companies that are deemed to be less relevant for comparison. The comparator group for 2023 constitutes 21 companies.

2.  Straight-line interpolation between threshold and maximum performance levels.

92

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCETotal pension entitlements
The Executive Directors are entitled to participate in a defined contribution pension scheme, into which the Company contributes 
up to 10% of base salary. No Directors were participants in the scheme as at 31 December 2023 (2022: none). As a result of the 
applicable HMRC limits, Fredrik Widlund instead received the full 10% contribution as a salary supplement and Andrew Kirkman 
received part of his 10% contribution as a salary supplement and the balance as a contribution to his Self Invested Personal 
Pension Plan (see Note 2, Single Total Figure for Executive Directors’ Remuneration (Audited)).

Overall 2023 remuneration
The Committee is satisfied that the current Policy operated as intended and that the overall 2023 remuneration paid to Executive 
Directors set out above was appropriate.

External appointments
Mr Widlund was appointed as a Trustee of Morden College, a social and housing charity, on 31 August 2018, for which no 
remuneration is paid. On 1 January 2021, Mr Kirkman was appointed as a non-executive director of A2Dominion Housing 
Group Limited, a housing association, for which he is paid £13,500 per annum.

Single total figure for Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration (audited)
Non-Executive Directors do not participate in any of the Company’s incentive arrangements nor do they receive any benefits 
other than reimbursement for reasonable travel expenses for attending Board meetings.

The following table sets out the fees received for 2023 and 2022:
Base membership fees

Other committee fees

 Additional fees 

Taxable benefits8

Total

2023

2022

2023

2022

2023

2022

2023

2022

2023

2022

Elizabeth Edwards1

Bill Holland2

Denise Jagger3

Christopher Jarvis4

Eva Lindqvist5

Bengt Mortstedt 

Anna Seeley6

Lennart Sten7

55

45

45

15

11

45

120

220

55

45

45

45

–

45

120

220

10

15

15

–

3

–

–

–

10

15

15

–

–

–

–

–

1

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

1

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

2

7

4

2

30

–

–

1

1

5

4

–

28

–

–

66

62

67

19

16

75

120

220

67

61

65

49

–

73

120

220

1.   Ms Edwards received the following annual fees: Board membership £45,000; Senior Independent Director £10,000 (included in base membership fee); Audit Committee 

membership £5,000; Nomination Committee Membership £5,000; and Workforce Advisory Panel £1,125 (included in Additional Fees).

2.   Mr Holland received the following fees: Board membership £45,000; Audit Committee Chair £10,000; Remuneration Committee membership £5,000.
3.   Ms Jagger received the following fees: Board membership £45,000; Remuneration Committee Chair £10,000; Audit Committee membership £5,000. Ms Jagger stepped  

down from the Board on 31 December 2023.

4.   Mr Jarvis stepped down from the Board on 27 April 2023 and his fees are pro-rated (£14,538).
5.    Eva Lindqvist was appointed to the Board on 22 September 2023. She received the following pro-rated fees: Board membership £11,250; Audit Committee membership 

£1,250; Remuneration Committee membership £1,250.

6.  Ms Seeley received the annual following fees: Non-Executive Vice-Chair fee of £120,000 (inclusive of all Committee fees).
7. Mr Sten received the following annual fees: Non-Executive Chairman fee of £220,000 (inclusive of all Committee fees).
8.   In accordance with the Company’s expenses policy, Non-Executive Directors receive reimbursement for their reasonable expenses for attending Board meetings. In 
instances where those costs are treated by HMRC as taxable benefits, the Company also meets the associated tax cost to the Non-Executive Directors through PAYE. 
Ms Edwards received such benefits of £381, which, being less than £500, is therefore not included in the above table.

Payments to past directors (audited)
John Whiteley retired from the role of CFO on 30 June 2019. Details of payments for Mr Whiteley can be found on page 98 of the 
2019 annual report. £6,362 was paid to Mr Whiteley in respect of the dividend equivalents following the vesting on 8 March 2023 
of shares granted in 2020 in respect of PIP Element B earned in 2019, which had already been disclosed in that year’s single figure 
of remuneration and remain subject to a two-year holding period. There are no further payments to be made to Mr Whiteley.

Payments for loss of office (audited)
No payments for loss of office were made in 2023.

93

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONRemuneration Committee Report continued

Directors’ interests in shares (audited)
The Executive Directors’ interests against the shareholding requirement under the Policy is provided below, with an indication 
of whether the requirement has been met. Under the Policy the Committee has implemented minimum shareholdings for the 
Executive Directors, which requires that the Chief Executive Officer should build a holding with a value of at least 250% of salary 
and the Chief Financial Officer at least 200% of salary within 5 years of the Policy being approved. At 31 December 2023, the 
interests of the Directors in the ordinary shares of 2.5 pence each of the Company were:

Unconditional 
shares

Vested but 
unexercised 
LTIP awards 

SIP shares 
(partnership)

SIP shares 
(matching)

Total
 interests3

Shareholding 
(%) salary3

Shareholding
 requirement4

Director

Fredrik Widlund1

Andrew Kirkman2

Elizabeth Edwards

Bill Holland

Denise Jagger

Eva Lindqvist

652,583

466,237

9,809

18,931

–

–

Bengt Mortstedt

26,063,140

Anna Seeley

Lennart Sten

12,273

111,350

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

6,429

4,890

6,429

4,890

665,441

476,017

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

133

144

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

N

N

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Conditional 
PIP Element A 
shares

LTIP unvested 
awards 

70,616

28,829

1,201,256

600,422

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

1.   On 8 March 2023, 92,401 Conditional PIP Element B shares vested of which 43,682 were sold to settle Mr Widlund’s tax liabilities. On 19 May 2023, 133,927 LTIP shares 
vested and were exercised on 5 June 2023, of which 62,946 were sold to settle Mr Widlund’s tax liabilities. As at the date of this report: the SIP balance for Mr Widlund 
consists of: 6,429 Partnership Shares and 6,429 Matching Shares. As set out on page 88 a closing balance of 38,168 Conditional PIP Element A notional shares will be 
awarded on 8 March 2024.

2.   On 8 March 2023, 26,358 Conditional PIP Element B shares vested of which 12,461 were sold to settle Mr Kirkman’s tax liabilities. On 19 May 2023, 65,475 LTIP shares 
vested and were exercised on 4 June 2023, of which 30,774 were sold to settle Mr Kirkman’s tax liabilities. As at the date of this report: the SIP balance for Mr Kirkman 
consists of: 4,890 Partnership Shares and 4,890 Matching Shares. As set out on page 88 a closing balance of 15,582 Conditional PIP Element A notional shares will be 
awarded on 8 March 2024.

3.   Shares counting towards total interests and therefore shareholding requirement include beneficially owned, pre-tax number of vested but unexercised awards and all 
SIP shares, but excludes the notional shares awarded under PIP Element A and unvested LTIP awards. Shareholding values based on 30-day average share price up to 
31 December 2023, £0.981.

4.   Mr Widlund met the shareholding requirement of 250% of salary in 2021 and it is noted that his total interests increased during the year by 76,931 shares but the 
overall value decreased by £249,387. Mr Kirkman met the shareholding requirement of 200% of salary in 2022 and it is noted that his total interests increased by 
24,796 shares but the overall value decreased by £223,516.

As part of Policy, a post-cessation of employment shareholding requirement has been implemented for the Executive Directors 
requiring the minimum shareholding requirement or actual shareholding on cessation if lower to be retained for two years. 
The Committee has determined that to ensure enforcement of this requirement, approval must be sought by the Company for 
any sales during this period. These restrictions would be set out in an agreement with the individual at the appropriate time.

Other than as set out in the notes above, there have been no movements in interests held by Directors between 31 December 2023 
and the date of this report.

Total returns to shareholders 2014–2023
To comply with the remuneration regulations, the Company’s TSR performance is compared to the TSR performance of the 
FTSE 350 and the FTSE 350 Supersector Real Estate indices over the last 10 years (see total return shareholders graph on page 1). 
The Committee believes that these are the most appropriate indices.

Executive Director service contracts and Non-Executive Director letters of appointment
Each of the Executive Directors has a service contract of no fixed term. There is no provision in the contracts of Mr. Widlund or Mr. 
Kirkman for contractual termination payments, save for those payments normally due under employment law.

Each Non-Executive Director has a letter of appointment but, in accordance with best practice, none has a service contract. All of 
the Non-Executive Directors are appointed until such time as they are not re-elected. In compliance with the Code, all Company 
Directors will face annual re-election at the Company’s AGM. If a director fails to be re-elected the terms of their appointment will 
cease. It is the Company’s policy not to offer notice periods of more that 12 months excercisable by either party.

Details of the service contracts for those who served as Executive Directors during the year are as follows:

Fredrik Widlund

Andrew Kirkman

94

Date of current 
service contact

3 November 2014

30 March 2019

Notice period

12 months

12 months

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCEThe table below sets out the dates that each Non-Executive Director was first appointed and the notice period by which their 
appointment may be terminated early by either party.

Director

Elizabeth Edwards

Bengt Mortstedt

Denise Jagger

Bill Holland

Anna Seeley

Chirstopher Jarvis

Lennart Sten

Eva Lindqvist

Date of appointment

Date of resignation

Notice period

13 May 2014

7 March 2017

1 August 2019

31 December 2023

20 November 2019

11 May 2015

25 November 2008

27 April 2023

1 August 2014

22 September 2023

3 months

3 months

3 months

3 months

3 months

3 months

3 months

3 months

Historical CEO remuneration
The table below sets out total CEO remuneration for 2023 and prior years, together with the percentage of maximum awarded 
under the annual or long-term incentive elements of the Policy at that time. 2023 includes the annual bonus awarded and the 2021 
LTIP TSR element which completed its performance period on 31 December 2023.

CEO total remuneration (£000)

2014

349

2015

656

2016

828

2017

1,062

2018

1,117

2019

1,078

2020

830

2021

944

2022

835

Element A of PIP – 
% of maximum

Annual Bonus Plan

Element B of PIP – 
% of maximum

LTIP – % of maximum

89.0%

81.0%

76.0%

93.3%

62.7%

87.3%

43.3%

31.1%

18.4%

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

76.0%

93.3%

62.7%

87.3%

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

46.9%

n/a

29.9%

n/a

nil

2023

952

n/a

n/a is shown in years where the Company did not operate either the PIP Element A, B or LTIP.

Annual Percentage change in Directors’ and employee remuneration
The table below shows how the annual percentage change in each Directors‘ salary/fees, benefits and bonus between 2020, 2021, 
2022 and 2023 compared with the percentage in each of those components of pay for employees.  Only the executive directors are 
employees of CLS Holdings plc. All other employees are employed by wholly owned CLS Holdings plc subsidiaries.

Percentage change 2023/22

Percentage change 2021/22

Percentage change 2020/21

Percentage change 2019/20

Salary/
fees %

Taxable 
benefits %

Bonus 
%

Salary/
fees %

Taxable 
benefits %

Bonus 
%

Salary/
fees %

Taxable 
benefits %

Bonus 
%

Salary/
fees %

Taxable 
benefits %

Bonus 
%

Fredrik Widlund 

Andrew Kirkman

Elizabeth Edwards 

Christopher Jarvis

Bengt Mortstedt

Denise Jagger 

Bill Holland

Anna Seeley

Lennart Sten

Eva Lindqvist

Employees

3

3

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

100

(3)

–

–

406

492

3.2

3.4

(46.3)

(37.0)

–

(36.3)

(201)

(12)

4

21

46

–

–

100

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

2

(36)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

100.0

300.0

75.0

66.7

(50)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

n/a

(1.5)

n/a

n/a

12.6

(25.8)

1.0

1.6

4.8

12.5

(27.3)

16.7

(27.9)

–

(8.2)

(50.0)

0.0

0.0

0.0

–

1.7

n/a

1.4

128.6

–

–

(40.0)

100.0

n/a

(5)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

n/a

2.7

19

108

8

(18)

–

157

883

50

86

n/a

–

(87)

n/a

(71)

(76)

–

n/a

–

n/a

n/a

(5)

(10)

(72)

(56)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

n/a

–

95

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONRemuneration Committee Report continued

There were no changes to the Board/Committee fees for the years ended 2021, 2022 and 2023. However, as a result of the Board 
and Committee changes during 2020, Ms Edwards, Ms Jagger and Mr Holland received additional remuneration for their new 
responsibilities (see page 93, single total figure for Non-Executive Directors Table Notes).

The Group’s pay review, taking effect from 1 December 2023 for UK employees, awarded a standard percentage increase in wages 
and salaries of 3% to all employees (including the Executive Directors).

The nature and level of benefits to employees in the year ended 31 December 2023 was broadly similar to those of the previous year.

CEO pay ratio
The table below sets out the ratios of the CEO single total figure of remuneration to the equivalent pay for the lower quartile, 
median and upper quartile of UK employees.

Year

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

Method

Option A

Option A

Option A

Option A

Option A

Pay ratio

Median

75th

13:1

12:1

12:1

11:1

15:1

8:1

7:1

7:1

8:1

8:1

25th

15:1

15:1

16:1

14:1

19:1

The CEO remuneration figure is as shown in the Single Total Figure for Executive Directors’ Remuneration table on page 88.

The remuneration figures for the employee at each quartile were determined as at 31 December 2023. Each employee’s pay and 
benefits were calculated using each element of employee remuneration on a full-time equivalent basis, consistent with the CEO 
noting that the value of SIP matching shares is included based on the value at grant rather than at vesting for the CEO. No 
adjustments (other than to achieve full-time equivalent rates) were made and no components of pay have been omitted. The salary 
and total pay and benefits for employees at each of the percentiles are as shown in the table below.

Pay data

CEO

Employee at 25th percentile 

Employee at 50th percentile 

Employee at 75th percentile 

Base salary 

Total pay 
and benefits

£491,839

£951,880

£53,000

£64,808

£64,480

£72,204

£95,000

£116,247

We have chosen methodology option A for the calculation, which takes into consideration the full-time equivalent basis of all UK 
employees and provides a representative result of employee pay conditions across the Company.

These ratios are used as part of the Committee’s remuneration decision-making process with regards to broader employee pay 
policies as well as remuneration policies for the Executive Directors.

The ratios for 2022 have been restated in line with the CEO’s 2022 single figure of remuneration which now includes the full vesting 
outcome of the 2020 LTIP awards. The ratios are very similar for 2023 compared to 2022 (restated) on the basis that both the CEO’s 
single figure of remuneration and employee pay have increased to a similar extent. The CEO’s single figure of remuneration 
increased in 2023 due to the increased payout under the annual bonus, although currently there is no vesting under the 2021 LTIP 
(noting that the Committee is yet to determine the outcome of the relative EPRA NTA growth per share condition). The Committee is 
satisfied that the median pay ratio is consistent with pay and progression policies for all CLS UK employees and a reflection across 
the Group. 

We expect the ratios to fluctuate in future years as the value of shares vesting under LTIP awards, for both the CEO and other 
participants, to vary from year to year.

96

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCERelative importance of the spend on pay

Remuneration paid to employees of the Group

Distributions to shareholders 

Share buyback 

Group revenue 

2023  
(£’000)

8,865

31,583

Nil

2022  
(£’000)

8,104

32,388

25,758

148,787

138,617

Percentage 
change 
Increase/
(decrease)

9.4

(2.5)

(100)

7.3

Wider workforce considerations cascade of pay through the organisation
The Group aims to provide a remuneration package for all employees which is market competitive and operates the same core 
structure as for Executive Directors. The Company’s remuneration philosophy for all senior management from the Executive 
Directors downwards is that all employees should have a significant annual element of performance-based pay.

For all employees, the Group operates a performance-based annual bonus scheme. The Company also has a Share Incentive Plan 
(SIP) in order to increase levels of share-ownership throughout the Company and to allow employees to share in the success of 
the Company. Additionally, the Group’s pension contributions to an employee’s pension scheme are determined by their length 
of service from a minimum of 5% of salary up to a maximum of 10%.

Executive Directors and senior management are participants in the LTIP, with the number of employees eligible to participate 
being 12. For the wider workforce, the LTIP is replaced by a time-based, company growth related loyalty bonus. This ensures a 
focus on long-term sustainable value creation to align experience with those of shareholders.

The table below summarises the cascade of pay elements through the organisation below Executive Directors.

Executive Directors

Senior Leadership  
(excl. Executive Directors)

Senior Management  
(excl. Senior Leadership Team)

Wider Workforce

Fixed 
Remuneration 
(including 
pension)

Number of 
employees

Annual 
bonus

Loyalty 
bonus

Bonus 
deferral

LTIP

Share 
Incentive 
Plan

Shareholding 
guidelines

2

5

5

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

–

–

–

Y

Y

–

–

–

Y

Y

Y

–

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

–

–

–

Employee engagement
We regularly communicate with our employees on a range of issues, including executive pay, through a variety of channels 
including all employee meetings, employee surveys, managers’ meetings and through our dedicated Intranet. Additionally, in 2019, 
Elizabeth Edwards was designated the Non-Executive Director responsible for overseeing employee engagement and chairs 
the Workforce Advisory Panel, consisting of representatives from across the organisation and at varying levels of seniority. 
This provided the opportunity for an open discussion between employees and the Board. The annual report of the work of the 
Workforce Advisory Panel during the year can be found on page 65. During the year, the Board reviewed the effectiveness of the 
current mechanism for seeking wider workforce views. Given that the practice of employee engagement has been successfully 
established through a number of channels, it was concluded to be more efficient and effective to move to a process of holding 
separate discussions in each country led by the designated Non-Executive Director. This will enable us to gain a deeper level of 
understanding and insight into the issues on a country by country basis rather than through team representatives, thereby 
enabling us to address any issues locally and with the appropriate nuance.

Fairness and diversity
The Company is committed to an active equal opportunities policy from recruitment and selection, through training and 
development, to performance reviews and promotion. All decisions relating to employment practices are objective, free from 
bias and based solely upon work criteria and individual merit. The Company is responsive to the needs of its employees, customers 
and the community at large. We are an organisation which uses everyone’s talents and abilities, where diversity is valued. The 
Company remains supportive of the employment and advancement of disabled persons and ensures its promotion and recruitment 
practices are fair and objective. The Company encourages the continuous development and training of its employees and the 
provision of equal opportunities for the training and career development of all employees.

97

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONRemuneration Committee Report continued

Gender pay reporting
The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017 requires companies with over 250 UK employees to disclose 
their gender pay gap annually. CLS Holdings plc has 60 UK employees as at 31 December 2023 and is therefore not required to 
disclose the Gender Pay Gap information under the regulations.

The Committee notes that results based on a relatively small sample of employees would not be meaningful and therefore has 
decided not to disclose the Company gender pay gap. Overall the Committee feels assured that the quality of processes behind 
individual pay decisions are effective in delivering an equal pay environment (like pay for like work) for the wider workforce.

Statement of implementation of policy in following financial year
The table below sets out the intended implementation of our Policy for 2024. The full Policy, as approved at our 2023 AGM, 
can be found on our website together with a summary of the changes from the previous policy.

Element of remuneration 

CEO

CFO

Salary 

Pension

Benefits 

3% increase for 2024, which is the average 
workforce increase (3%)
2024 salary: £506,594 (2023: £491,839)

3% increase for 2024, which is the average 
workforce increase (3%)
2024 salary: £325,074 (2023: £315,606)

10% of salary employer contribution in line with Policy and maximum wider workforce contribution rate.

Standard benefits in line with Policy

Annual bonus – Quantum Maximum opportunity of 150% of salary 
(no change)

Maximum opportunity of 125% of salary (no change)

Annual bonus – Structure 

•  Payment will be in cash up to 100% of salary subject to the satisfaction of performance criteria.
•  Any balance over 100% of salary will be deferred (at that point) into shares and vest after 3 years, 

Annual bonus – 
Performance measures 

LTIP – Quantum 

LTIP – Structure 

LTIP – Performance 
measures

subject to continued employment.

•  25% of maximum paid for threshold performance and 50% for target performance.
•  Malus and clawback provisions apply.

Reweighting of existing metrics as set out below:
•  EPRA EPS – 40% weighting (no change)
•  Total Accounting Return (based on EPRA NTA) – 15% weighting (previously 20%)
•  EPRA vacancy rate – 25% weighting (previously 20%)
•  Strategic objectives (including ESG) – 20% weighting (no change)
In line with market practice for traditional annual bonus arrangements and with the bonus increasingly being 
driven by commercially sensitive targets, the Committee has decided not to disclose detailed annual bonus 
targets for 2024. However, full and transparent disclosure of the targets and performance outcomes will continue 
to be set out on a retrospective basis in next year’s Directors’ Remuneration Report.

150% of salary award (no change, albeit policy 
maximum is 200% of salary)

120% of salary (no change, albeit policy maximum is 200% of 
salary)

•  Awarded in nil cost options or conditional awards with performance measured over 3 years.
•  Vested awards will be subject to a further 2 year holding period post-vesting.
•  Malus and clawback will operate over the full 5 year lock-in period.

•  Relative TSR – 35% weighting 
•  Relative EPRA NTA Growth – 65% weighting
The peer group for both metrics is based on the FTSE350 Supersector Real Estate Index and excludes 
certain companies that are deemed to be less relevant for comparison. The comparator group constitutes 
around 20 companies.
25% of awards vest for median performance rising on a straight-line basis to 100% for upper quartile performance.

Non-Executive Directors (Including Non-Executive Chairman and Non-Executive Vice Chair)

Fees

Non-Executive Directors are paid a base fee and are eligible to receive Committee Chair and membership 
fees, SID fee and Workforce Advisory Panel daily fee. Non-Executive Directors do not participate in any 
variable remuneration. See the section below for further details on fee levels and changes for 2024.

The Committee does not expect to deviate from Policy during the year.

The run-off of legacy for the PIP Element A awards will be as set out on page 151 of the 2022 annual report.

98

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCENon-Executive Directors (Including Non-Executive Chairman and Non-Executive Vice Chair) (audited)
The current fee levels, and those for the future financial year, are set out in the table below.

Chairman fees

Non-Executive Vice Chair 

NED Base Membership fee

Senior Independent Director

Audit Committee Chair

Remuneration Committee Chair 

Committee membership

Designated workforce NED

Fees 2024 
£000

Fees 2023 
£000

Change 
%

235

128

50

10

10

10

5

220

120

45

10

10

10

5

£850 p/d

£750 p/d

6.8

6.7

11

0

0

0

0

13

No additional fees are paid to the Chair of the Nomination Committee as the role is currently carried out by the Vice Chair.

Fees are reviewed in line with remuneration policy renewal and were last reviewed in 2019. Following a review, which took into 
account the time period since the last review (during which time our employees received annual inflationary adjustments) and current 
market positioning, the fees were increased as set out in the table above to ensure we remain able to attract and retain appropriately 
skilled and experienced non-executive directors. The daily rate for work undertaken by the designated workforce NED was also 
increased by a similar amount.

See page 93 for total fees received in 2023 by each of the Non-Executive Directors based on their respective responsibilities.

Long-Term Incentive Awards to be granted in 2024
The table below describes how the LTIP will be implemented in 2024. The CEO’s award will be 150% of salary and the CFO’s award 
will be 120% of salary.

Award vesting for performance (% maximum)

Relative Total Shareholder Return (35%)

Relative EPRA NTA growth per share (65%)

Straight line interpolation between performance levels.

Threshold 

Maximum

25% 

100%

Median 

Upper Quartile 

Median

Upper Quartile

As set out above, the comparator group will still constitute around 20 companies that are constituents of the FTSE350 Supersector 
Real Estate Index

Consideration by the Committee of matters relating to Directors’ remuneration for 2023
The consideration of matters relating to Directors’ Remuneration for 2023 is on pages 81 to 99.

Shareholder voting
The following table represents the voting outcome for the Directors’ Remuneration Report at the 2023 Annual General Meeting 
and the current Policy that was also approved at the 2023 Annual General Meeting.

For

Against

Total votes cast 

Votes withheld

Directors Remuneration Report
(2023 AGM)

Directors Remuneration Policy
(2023 AGM)

Number  
of votes

% of  

votes cast Number of votes 

347,002,378

98.45

349,550,240

5,479,088

1.55

2,931,226

% of  
votes cast

99.17

0.83

352,481,466

101,878

352,481,466

101,878

99

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONDirectors’ Report

The Directors present their annual report and the audited financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023.

The Chairman’s letter, strategic report and corporate governance report form part of this report and should be read 
in conjunction with it.

Review of business
•  The Group income statement for the year is set out on page 116.
•  The Group objectives, business model and strategy are set out on pages 17 and 18. KPIs are set out on pages 22 and 23.
•  Important events (including post-balance sheet events) affecting the Company are set out on pages 2 to 106.
•  The principal and emerging risks and uncertainties are set out on pages 51 to 53.
•  The use of financial instruments are set out on page 29, and in note 21 to the Group financial statements.
•  The risk management objectives are detailed in note 21 to the Group financial statements. See also pages 48 to 53.
•  The Group’s likely future developments are set out on pages IFC to 11. 

Directors
Biographical details and experience of the current Directors of the Company are set out on pages 60 and 61.

All Directors will be subject to annual re-election at the 2024 Annual General Meeting in accordance with the UK Corporate 
Governance Code. In his role as independent Non-Executive Chairman, Lennart Sten recommends the re-election of the retiring 
Directors at the 2024 Annual General Meeting, given their experience, performance and continued important contribution to the 
long-term success of the Company. The Senior Independent Non-Executive Director recommends the re-election of Mr Sten.

Directors’ remuneration and interests in shares are set out on pages 81 to 99.

Related party transactions are set out in note 32 to the Group financial statements.

Dividends
An interim dividend of 2.60 pence per share was paid on 3 October 2023. The Directors are proposing a final dividend of 5.35 pence 
per share making a total dividend for the year ended 31 December 2023 of 7.95 pence per share. The final dividend will be paid on 
2 May 2024 to shareholders who are on the register of members on 23 March 2024.

Purchase of the Company’s shares
There were no purchases of the Company’s own shares during the year. A resolution will be proposed at the 2024 Annual General 
Meeting to give the Company authority to make market purchases of up to 39,741,026 shares, being 10% of the current issued 
share capital.

Share capital
Changes in share capital are shown in note 23 to the Group financial statements. As at 31 December 2023, and at the date of this 
report, the Company’s issued share capital consisted of 438,777,780 ordinary shares of 2.5 pence each, of which 397,410,268 held 
voting rights and 41,367,512 shares were held as treasury shares, and all of which ranked pari passu. The rights (including full 
details relating to voting), obligations and any restrictions on transfer relating to the Company’s shares, and the powers of the 
Directors in that regard, are set out in the Company’s Articles of Association.

Major interests in the Company’s shares
As at the date of this report the Company’s top 10 shareholders, including those who have notified the Company of their interests 
above 3% in the Company’s issued share capital, are:

The Trustee of The Sten and Karin Mortstedt Family & Charity Trust
Bengt Mortstedt
Allianz Global Investors
BlackRock
Janus Henderson Investors
Amati Global Investors
Columba Threadneedle Investment 
Vanguard Group
Invesco 
Hargreaves Lansdown, stockbrokers (EO)

No. of shares

219,917,524
26,063,140
14,189,200
13,813,471
9,431,067
8,990,406
8,534,912
7,640,279
7,572,937
4,853,373

%

55.34%
6.60%
3.57%
3.48%
2.37%
2.26%
2.15%
1.92%
1.91%
1.22%

Details of the Directors’ interests in shares are shown in the Remuneration Committee Report on page 96. There are no 
shareholders who carry special rights with regard to control of the Company and there are no restrictions on voting rights. The 
Company knows of no agreements between holders of securities which would result in restrictions on the transfer of securities or 
on voting rights.

100

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCESignificant agreements – change of control
A change of control of the Company may cause a number of 
agreements to which the Company or its active subsidiaries 
is party, such as commercial trading contracts, banking 
arrangements, property leases and licence agreements, to 
alter or terminate or provisions in those agreements to take 
effect. In the context of the Group as a whole, only the banking 
arrangements are considered to be significant. There are 
no agreements between the Company and its Directors or 
employees providing for compensation for loss of office or 
employment that occur because of a change of control.

Relationship agreement – controlling shareholder
As at 31 December 2023, Creative Value Investment Group Limited 
(‘CVIG’), the investment vehicle for The Sten and Karin Mortstedt 
Family & Charity Trust, held through its wholly owned subsidiaries 
55.34% of the Company’s shares in issue and was therefore seen 
as a controlling shareholder under the Listing Rules.

Pursuant to Listing Rule 9.8.4, the Company has entered into a 
relationship agreement which shall only be terminated in the 
event that CVIG ceases to be a controlling shareholder or if the 
Company ceases to be admitted to listing on the premium 
segment of the Official List. Throughout the period under 
review, the Company has complied with the mandatory 
independence provisions and procurement obligations in the 
relationship agreement, and as far as the Company is aware, 
CVIG has also complied.

Property portfolio
A valuation of all the investment properties, properties held 
for sale and hotel in plant, property and equipment in the Group 
at 31 December 2023 was carried out by Cushman and 
Wakefield for the UK, and Jones Lang LaSalle in Germany and 
France, which produced an aggregate market value of 
£2,062.9 million (2022: £2,352.7 million).

Corporate governance
The Corporate Governance Statement, prepared in accordance 
with rule 7.2 of the FCA’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency 
Rules, is set out on pages 58 to 103 and forms part of this 
report. It applies to the Company and its subsidiaries. It does 
not include associates. The Group has no joint ventures.

Employees, environmental and social issues
The Group’s policies on employment, environmental and social 
issues (including the information required by the Companies Act 
2006 (strategic report and Directors’ report) Regulations 2013), 
including charitable donations, are summarised in the 
Environmental, Social and Governance Review on pages 32 
to 47. No political donations to any parties, organisations or 
candidates, or political expenditure were made during 2023. 
The Group has also published a Sustainability Strategy and Net 
Zero Carbon pathway documents which are available on line at 
www.clsholdings.com.

Engagement with suppliers, customers and others in a 
business relationship with the Company
The statement in respect of the Company’s engagement with 
suppliers, customers and others throughout the year is set 
out in the stakeholder engagement sections on pages 24 to 45 
and our Prompt Payment Code is detailed in the environmental, 
social and governance review on page 40.

Human rights
The Board ensures the Group upholds and promotes respect 
for human rights in all its current operating locations and aims to 
prevent any negative human rights impact. As the Group operates 
in the UK, Germany and France it is subject to the European 
Convention on Human Rights and the UK Human Rights Act 1998. 
The Group respects all human rights and in conducting its 
business regards those rights relating to non-discrimination and 
fair treatment to be the most relevant and to have the greatest 
potential impact on its key stakeholders, which are deemed to be 
customers, employees and suppliers. The Board has also noted 
its moral and legal obligations under the Modern Slavery Act 
2015. The Board has a zero tolerance approach towards modern 
slavery, and throughout the year the Company has contacted its 
first tier contractors and suppliers to ensure their compliance 
with the Act. Our full statement on Modern Slavery can be found 
on our website at www.clsholdings.com. The Group’s policies seek 
to ensure that employees comply with the relevant legislation 
and regulations in place to promote good practice. The Group’s 
policies are formulated and kept up to date and communicated to 
all employees through the Group Intranet and, where appropriate, 
individual presentations. In the year to 31 December 2023, the 
Group was not aware of any incident in which the organisation’s 
activities have resulted in an abuse of human rights.

Insurance of directors and indemnities
The Company has arranged insurance cover in respect of legal 
action against its Directors and Officers. The Company has 
granted indemnities to each of the Directors and other senior 
management, uncapped in amount but subject to applicable 
law, in relation to certain losses and liabilities which they may 
incur in the course of acting as Directors or employees of the 
Company or one or more of its subsidiaries or associates.

Auditor
A resolution to re-appoint Ernst & Young LLP as Auditor to the 
Company will be proposed at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting.

2024 Annual General Meeting
The 2024 Annual General Meeting will be held on Thursday, 
25 April 2024. The notice of meeting, including explanatory 
notes for the resolutions to be proposed, will be posted 
to shareholders.

Disclosure of information to the Auditor
Each Director has confirmed at the date of this report that:

•  so far as they are aware, there is no relevant audit 

Charitable donations during the year totalled £85,559 
(2022: £89,976). As part of the Group’s ESG strategy, it sponsors 
charitable events and organisations relating to the real estate 
industry and, more specifically, assists charities and 
organisations with donations and staff involvement initiatives in 
the areas where our properties are located. Further details can 
be found on page 40.

information of which the Company’s auditor is unaware; and
•  they have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken as 
a Director in order to make themselves aware of any relevant 
audit information and to establish that the Company’s auditor 
is aware of that information. This confirmation is given and 
should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of 
s418 of the Companies Act 2006.

101

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONDirectors’ Report continued

Going concern
Notwithstanding the material uncertainty the Directors have a 
reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group have 
adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the 
foreseeable future and further details of this analysis are set 
out together with the viability statement on pages 54-57. 
Therefore, the Directors continue to adopt the going concern 
basis in preparing the annual report and accounts.

Listing Rule

Information required

9.8.4(1)
9.8.4(2)
9.8.4(4)
9.8.4(5)
9.8.4(6)
9.8.4(7)
9.8.4(8)
9.8.4(9)
9.8.4(10)
9.8.4(11)
9.8.4(12)
9.8.4(13)
9.8.4(14)

Interest capitalised by the Group
Publication of unaudited financial information
Long-term incentive schemes with directors
Director’s waiver of emoluments
Director’s waiver of future emoluments
Non-pro-rata allotments for cash (issuer)
Non-pro-rata allotments for cash (major subsidiaries)
Listed company is subsidiary of another company
Contracts of significance with a director
Contracts of significance with Controlling Shareholder
Dividend waiver
Waiver of future dividends
Relationship agreement with controlling shareholder

Disclosures under listing rule 9.8.4R
The table below is included to comply with the disclosure 
requirements under Listing Rule 9.8.4R. The information 
required by the Listing Rules can be found in the annual 
report at the location stated below.

Disclosure

Not applicable
Pages 160
Pages 81-99
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Not applicable
Not applicable
Page 101

The following table is included to comply with the additional disclosure requirements under the Listing Rule 9.8.6

Listing Rule

Information required

9.8.6(1)

9.8.6(2)

9.8.6(3)
9.8.6(4)(a)
9.8.6(4)(b)
9.8.6(4)(c)
9.8.6(4)(d)
9.8.6(5)
9.8.6(6)(b)
9.8.6(7)

9.8.6R

Directors’ (and Connected Persons’) interests in CLS shares at year end and at not more 
than one month prior to the date of the AGM notice
Interests in CLS shares disclosed under DTR5 at year end and not more than one month 
prior to the date of AGM notice
The going concern statement
Amount of authority to purchase own shares available at year end
Off-market purchases of own shares during the year
Off-market purchases of own shares since year end
Non-pro-rata sales of treasury shares during the year
Compliance with the Main Principles of the UK Corporate Governance Code
Details of non-compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code
Directors proposed for re-election: the unexpired term of any director’s service contract 
and a statement about directors with no service contracts
Climate-related financial disclosures consistent with the TCFD recommendations and 
recommended disclosures 

Disclosure

Page 94

Page 100

Page 54-57
39,721,086 shares
None
None
None
Page 59
Pages 59, 66 and 69
Page 95

Pages 41-47

Employee Benefit Trust
Altum Trustees Limited (the “Trustee”) continues as Trustee of 
CLS Holdings plc’s Employee Benefit Trust (the “EBT”).  The EBT 
is used to purchase the Company’s shares in the market from 
time to time for the benefit of employees, including to satisfy 
outstanding awards under Company’s various share plans.

A dividend waiver is in place from the Trustee in respect of all 
dividends payable by the Company’s on shares which the EBT may 
hold.  Further details regarding the EBT and of treasury shares 
issued pursuant to CLS Holdings plc employee share plans during 
the year are set out in note 23 to the financial statements.

Approved and authorised on behalf of the Board

During the year, the EBT made market purchases of 341,340 
shares (2022: 336,423 shares).  On 6 June 2023, 199,402 
treasury shares were transferred to the EBT.  The EBT released 
these shares to satisfy vested share plan awards.  As at 
31 December 2023, the EBT did not hold any shares either 
purchased on the market or previously held in treasury.

David Fuller BA FCG
Company Secretary

8 March 2024

102

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
Directors’ responsibility statement

Directors’ responsibilities 
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report 
and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law 
and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial 
statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors 
are required to prepare the Group financial statements in 
accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and United Kingdom 
adopted International Accounting Standards and International 
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and have elected to 
prepare the Parent Company financial statements in 
accordance with FRS101 of United Kingdom Generally Accepted 
Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and 
applicable law). Under company law the Directors must not 
approve the accounts unless they are satisfied that they give a 
true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and of the 
profit or loss of the Group for that period.

In preparing the Parent Company financial statements, the 
Directors are required to:

•  select suitable accounting policies and then apply them 

consistently;

•  make judgements and accounting estimates that are 

reasonable and prudent;

•  state whether applicable UK Accounting Standards have been 
followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and 
explained in the financial statements; and

•  prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis 
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will 
continue in business.

In preparing the Group financial statements, International 
Accounting Standard 1 requires that Directors:

•  properly select and apply accounting policies;
•  present information, including accounting policies, in a 

manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and 
understandable information;

•  provide additional disclosures when compliance with the 
specific requirements in IFRSs are insufficient to enable 
users to understand the impact of particular transactions, 
other events and conditions on the entity’s financial position 
and financial performance; and

•  make an assessment of the Group’s ability to continue as 

a going concern.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting 
records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s 
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time 
the financial position of the Company and enable them to ensure 
that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 
2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of 
the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the 
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity 
of the corporate and financial information included on the 
Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom 
governing the preparation and dissemination of financial 
statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Responsibility statement
We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:

•  the financial statements, prepared in accordance with the 

relevant financial reporting framework, give a true and fair 
view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or 
loss of the Company and the undertakings included in the 
consolidation taken as a whole;

•  the strategic report includes a fair review of the development 

and performance of the business and the position of the 
Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation 
taken as a whole, together with a description of the principal 
risks and uncertainties that they face; and

•  the annual report and financial statements, taken as a whole, 

are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the 
information necessary for shareholders to assess the 
Company’s position and performance, business model 
and strategy.

This statement of responsibilities was approved by the Board on 
5 March 2024.

Approved and authorised on behalf of the Board

David Fuller BA FCG
Company Secretary

8 March 2024

103

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual   Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONIndependent Auditor’s Report  
to the members of CLS Holdings Plc

Opinion
In our opinion:

•  CLS Holdings plc’s Group financial statements and Parent Company financial statements (the ‘financial statements’) give a true 
and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2023 and of the Group’s loss for 
the year then ended;

•  the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards;
•  the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted 

Accounting Practice; and

•  the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

We have audited the financial statements of CLS Holdings plc (the ‘Parent Company’) and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) for the year 
ended 31 December 2023 which comprise:

GROUP

PARENT COMPANY 

Group balance sheet as at 31 December 2023

Company balance sheet as at 31 December 2023

Group income statement for the year ended 31 
December 2023

Company statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 2023

Group statement of comprehensive income for the 
year ended 31 December 2023

Related notes 1 to 15 to the financial statements including a summary of significant 
accounting policies 

Group statement of changes in equity for the year 
ended 31 December 2023

Group statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 
December 2023

Related notes 1 to 32 to the financial statements, 
including a summary of significant accounting policies 

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Group financial statements is applicable law and 
UK adopted international accounting standards. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the 
Parent Company financial statements is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including FRS 101 “Reduced 
Disclosure Framework” (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).

Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. 
Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial 
statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a 
basis for our opinion.

Material uncertainty related to going concern
We draw attention to Note 2 – Going Concern in the financial statements, which indicates that the going concern assumption is 
dependent upon the timing and value of both the refinancing of the debt maturing and investment property disposals during the 
going concern period to 31 July 2025. The Group and Company acknowledges that these refinancings and disposals are dependent 
on circumstances outside their control. As stated in note 2, these events or conditions, along with the other matters as set forth in 
note 2, indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s and Company’s ability to continue 
as a going concern. Consequently, we determined Going Concern to be a Key Audit Matter (see below).

Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.

We draw attention to the viability statement in the Annual Report on page 56, which indicates that an assumption to the statement 
of viability is for the Group to be able to refinance its existing loans and achieve the planned disposals of assets. The Directors 
consider that the material uncertainty referred to in respect of going concern may cast significant doubt over the future viability of 
the Group should these events not complete.

104

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSOur opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the 
preparation of the financial statements is appropriate, albeit, as set out above, a material uncertainty exists. Our evaluation of the 
Directors’ assessment of the Group and Parent Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting 
included the following: 

•  We assessed the risk around going concern in planning our audit, at the interim and again at the year-end phase.
•  We assessed the appropriateness of the going concern period to 31 July 2025 (“the going concern period”), which takes into 
consideration the maturity of loans maturing (amounting to £311m) and the planned disposals (of £307m) in that period.
•  We obtained an understanding of the process followed by management to prepare the Group’s going concern assessment, 

including challenging the completeness of risks identified in management’s assessment and identifying and assessing scenarios 
that may arise as a result of the current economic and financial environment, including forecast inflation levels and interest 
rates, and other macro-economic factors which may adversely affect future occupancy and income and cost levels and the 
impact of a further fall in property valuations on compliance with loan covenants. 

•  We obtained the Base case and the Severe but plausible case covering the going concern period prepared by management and 
provided to the Board. We tested the mathematical accuracy of the models and verified the opening available cash balance in 
management’s cash flow forecast by comparing it to the year-end cash balance, which was subject to our audit procedures.
•  We obtained an understanding of how management prepared the two scenarios: the Base case is based on the Group’s forecast 
cash flows approved by the Board at its November 2023 meeting, updated for actual results to date. The Severe but plausible 
case starts from the Base case by flexing key assumptions further; it applies more severe assumptions including lower rents; 
increased service charge costs, higher property and administration expenses; falling property values, higher interest rates and 
failing to achieve planned refinancing and disposals. 

•  We challenged the appropriateness of each of the key assumptions in the two scenarios by agreeing them to supporting evidence 
and searching for contradictory evidence, using our understanding of the Group’s business, evidence gained during the audit, 
knowledge of the wider real estate market and input from our real estate valuation and debt specialists. We assessed the 
historical forecasting accuracy as an input into determining the ability of management to forecast for the going concern period.

•  We checked that the terms and conditions of the Group’s loan agreements had been appropriately incorporated into the going 
concern scenarios and modelling, including the maturity profile of the Group’s borrowings and the requirements in relation to 
covenant compliance.

•  We performed testing to evaluate whether the covenant requirements of the debt facilities would be breached under the Base 
case and the Severe but plausible case prepared by management and applied additional stress tests to observe their impact 
on liquidity.

•  We challenged the mitigations used by management in both the Base case and the Severe but plausible case, including certain 
refinancing and repayment of debt, property disposals, dividend distribution and capital expenditure, by comparing to actual 
cash flows in 2023, obtaining supporting evidence from management and searching for contrary evidence. We also challenged to 
what extent these mitigations are within management’s control.

•  We challenged management whether there is a realistic prospect that the Group would be able to complete the refinancings of 

the debt maturing in the going concern period within the timescale required. The refinancing or repayment of the debt maturing 
during the going concern period (£311.3m) is a critical assumption in management’s going concern assessment. Our audit 
procedures included considering management’s refinancing track record and any evidence of the progress of ongoing 
refinancing. We also obtained the perspective of our debt advisory specialists in the UK, France and Germany on the market 
appetite for refinancing such of loans. 

•  We also challenged management whether the Group would be able to complete the planned property disposals (including the 
properties classified as held for sale of £172.7m) included in their going concern assessment within the timescale required. 
Our audit procedures included considering evidence of the progress to date of planned disposals.

•  We read the disclosures in the Annual Report and Financial Statements in relation to going concern to assess whether they 

appropriately disclose the risks, the impact on the Group’s operations and results and the availability of mitigating actions to 
be taken.

The results of the Severe but plausible downside scenario modelled by management indicate that a material uncertainty exists that 
may cast significant doubt on the Group’s and Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

105

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONIndependent Auditor’s Report  
to the members of CLS Holdings Plc continued

In relation to the Group and Parent Company’s reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have 
nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to: 

•  the Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going 

concern basis of accounting; and 

•  the Directors’ identification in the financial statements of the material uncertainty related to the Group’s ability to continue as a 

going concern over the period to 31 July 2025.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of 
this report. However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this statement is not a guarantee as to the 
Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Independence
We are independent of the Group and Parent Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of 
the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have 
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. 

The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided to the Group or the Parent Company and we 
remain independent of the Group and the Parent Company in conducting the audit. 

Overview of our audit approach

Audit scope

•  The Group operates in the United Kingdom, Germany and France. We performed an audit of the complete financial 

information. We determined that each of these three principal business regions are within the Group audit, which was 
designated as a full scope region. 

•  The region where we performed full or specific audit procedures accounted for 100% of EPRA Earnings, 100% of Revenue and 

Key audit  
matters

Materiality

100% of Total assets.

•  Valuation of the property portfolio.
•  Rental income and other property related income recognition. 
•  Going concern basis used in the preparation of the financial statements.

•  Overall Group materiality of £19.5m which represents 0.9% of total assets as at 31 December 2023. Overall materiality is 
applied to account balances not related to rental income, revenue from hotel and student accommodation, administrative 
expenses and other expenses (and their related balance sheet accounts).

•  Specific materiality of £2m which represents 5% of EPRA earnings for testing of balances that significantly impact that 
measure. Specific materiality is applied to account balances related to rental income, revenue from hotel and student 
accommodation, administrative expenses and other expenses (and related balance sheet accounts).

•  Parent Company materiality of £5.5m which represents 0.9% of total assets in the Parent Company balance sheet. 

Parent Company materiality is applied to all balances within the Parent Company.

An overview of the scope of the Parent Company and Group audits 
Tailoring the scope
All the audit work performed in relation to the Parent Company was undertaken by the Group audit team in the UK.

Our assessment of audit risk, our evaluation of materiality and our allocation of performance materiality determined our audit 
scope for each geographic region within the Group (the United Kingdom, Germany and France). Taken together, this enables us to 
form an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We take into account the size, risk profile, organisation of the Group and 
effectiveness of group-wide controls, changes in the business environment, potential impact of climate change and other factors 
such as recent internal audit results when assessing the level of work to be performed. We did not identify components, but rather, 
full scope audit work was performed directly by a single integrated audit team on the consolidated results.

106

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSIn assessing the risk of material misstatement to the Group financial statements, and to ensure we had adequate quantitative 
coverage of significant accounts in the financial statements, we utilised an integrated team across all three material geographic 
regions where the Group operates (the United Kingdom, Germany and France) and so our audit procedures accounted for 100% 
(2022: 100%) of the Group’s EPRA Earnings (as defined by the European Public Real Estate Association ‘EPRA’), the Group’s Revenue 
and the Group’s Total assets.

Below is the contribution of each geographic region to the Group’s results: 

EPRA Earnings
Revenue
Total assets

UNITED KINGDOM
30% of the Group
51% of the Group
46% of the Group

GERMANY
59% of the Group
38% of the Group
42% of the Group

FRANCE
11% of the Group
11% of the Group
12% of the Group

Climate change 
Stakeholders are increasingly interested in how climate change will impact CLS Holdings plc. The Group has determined that the 
most significant future impacts from climate change on its operations will be from transitional and physical risks, in the context of 
the Group’s net zero carbon plan. These are explained on pages 41-42 in the required Task Force for Climate related Financial 
Disclosures and on pages 43 to 46 in the principal risks and uncertainties. The Group has also explained their climate 
commitments on pages 32 to 47. All of these disclosures form part of the “Other information,” rather than the audited financial 
statements. Our procedures on these unaudited disclosures therefore consisted solely of considering whether they are materially 
inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appear to be 
materially misstated, in line with our responsibilities on “Other information”. 

In planning and performing our audit we assessed the potential impacts of climate change on the Group’s business and any 
consequential material impact on its financial statements. 

The Group has explained in their accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty note to the financial statements 
(Note 3) that, in preparing the financial statements, the Group has considered the impact of climate change in their financial 
statements including how this aligns with their commitment to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2030.

Our audit work considering the impact of climate change on the financial statements was focused on evaluating management’s 
assessment of the impact of climate risk, physical and transition, their climate commitments, and disclosures. We also focussed on 
assessing whether the effects of material climate risks disclosed on pages 41 and 42 and the significant judgements and estimates 
disclosed in note 3, have been appropriately reflected in the property portfolio valuation and associated disclosures and in the 
models of future cash flows which are used to assess the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. Details of our procedures 
and findings on the valuation of the property portfolio are included in our Key Audit Matters below. We performed our own risk 
assessment, supported by our internal climate change specialists, to determine the risk of material misstatement in the financial 
statements from climate change which needed to be considered in our audit. 

We also challenged the Directors’ considerations of climate change risks in their assessment of going concern and viability and 
associated disclosures. Where considerations of climate change were relevant to our assessment of going concern, these are 
described above.

107

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONIndependent Auditor’s Report  
to the members of CLS Holdings Plc continued

Key audit matters
Key Audit Matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial 
statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to 
fraud) that we identified. These matters included those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of 
resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit 
of the financial statements as a whole, and in our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

In addition to the matter described in the material uncertainty related to going concern section, we have determined the matters 
described below to be the Key Audit Matters to be communicated in our report.

KEY OBSERVATIONS COMMUNICATED TO 
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE 

We have tested the inputs, 
assumptions and methodology used 
by external valuers. 

We concluded that the methodology 
applied is reasonable and that the 
valuations are an appropriate 
assessment of the fair value of the 
property portfolio at 
31 December 2023.

We concluded that the fair value of 
the properties is in the higher end of 
what we consider to be the 
reasonable range of values.

We have reviewed the disclosures in 
the financial statements including 
the accounting judgements and key 
sources of estimation uncertainty 
and sensitivities and consider them 
to be appropriate. 

RISK

OUR RESPONSE TO THE RISK

Valuation of the property 
portfolio (2023: £2,062.9m, 
2022: £2,352.8m)

Refer to the Audit Committee 
Report (page 80); Material 
accounting policies (pages 122 - 
123); and Notes 11, 12, 13 and 14 of 
the Consolidated Financial 
Statements (pages 132 - 136)

The valuation of the property 
portfolio requires significant 
judgement and use of estimates 
by management and the 
external valuers.

Any input inaccuracies or 
unreasonable bases used in 
these estimates (such as in 
respect of market rental income 
and yields applied) could result 
in a material misstatement of 
the income statement and 
balance sheet. 

There is also a risk that 
management may influence the 
significant judgements and 
estimates in respect of property 
valuations in order to achieve 
property valuation and other 
performance targets to meet 
market expectations or 
bonus targets.

Our audit procedures over the valuation of the property portfolio included:

•  We obtained an understanding of the Group’s processes and controls around 

the valuation of the property portfolio.

•  We evaluated the competence of the external valuers which included 

consideration of their qualifications and expertise. Further we obtained a 
confirmation from the external valuers that they had not been subject to 
undue influence from management. 

•  We met with the external valuers to discuss their valuation approach and the 
estimates they made in assessing the property valuation. Such estimates 
included the market rental income and yields applied.

•  We reviewed the external valuations reports for unusual items or caveats.
•  We tested the accuracy of the input data by agreeing these inputs (i.e. 

contracted rent, lease expiry, lease space) with the tenancy schedules which 
have been used and tested in our rental income procedures. We tested 
source documentation provided by the Group to the external valuers, such as 
underlying lease data or signed contracts.

•  We conducted analytical reviews including assessing the assumption and 
valuation movements year-on-year with reference to explanations in 
movements provided by the external valuer and assessing the evidence we 
have found during the audit (both corroborating and contradicting).

•  We challenged both management and the external valuer where we identified 

unexpected movements.

•  We tested the mathematical accuracy of the tenancy schedules and 

valuation calculations. 

•  We performed site visits for a sample of properties, to confirm existence and 

understand the state of repair of the properties.

•  We assessed the adequacy of the disclosures of estimates and valuation 
assumptions in note 12 that were made in accordance with IFRS 13 – Fair 
Value Measurement.

•  We risk assessed the property portfolio to determine the extent of our other 

audit work:
 – Higher risk assets – such as those under development, with complex 
leasing arrangements, in markets under greater stress, exposed to 
greater risk through climate change or with unexpected valuation 
movements – amounted to 55% of property value. 
 – Lower risk assets amounted to 45% of property value.

•  We then performed the following work on each category of property:

 – Higher risk assets - our real estate valuation specialists challenged the 
valuation approach and assumptions for this category of properties. 
They compared the market rental income and yields applied to each 
property valuation to an expected range of assumptions taking into 
account available market data and asset specific considerations. 
This included assessing the external valuers; considerations of climate 
change factors and market factors such as the macroeconomic 
environment and its impact on the occupational and investment markets. 
Our real estate valuation specialists performed a recalculation or developed 
a comparative calculation considering a combination of some or all the 
external valuer’s assumptions, to test the external valuer’s estimate. 
Where properties were considered to be at the upper end of our 
reasonable range, we sought additional evidence from the external valuer.
 – Lower risk – our work was similar to the above but conducted by the core 

audit team rather than our real estate valuation specialists.

108

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSKEY OBSERVATIONS COMMUNICATED TO 
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE 

Based upon the audit procedures 
performed, we concluded that 
rental income has been 
appropriately recognised on a 
straight line basis and other 
property related income has been 
recognised in accordance with the 
Group’s accounting policy.

RISK

OUR RESPONSE TO THE RISK

Rental income and other 
property related income 
recognition (2023: £148.7m, 
2022: £139.7m)

Refer to the Audit Committee 
Report (page 80) and Material 
accounting policies (page 124)

Misstatements that occur in 
relation to revenue recognition of 
rental income, including through 
incorrect treatment of the lease 
incentives, and other property-
related income from student 
accommodation and hotel 
operations, could materially 
impact the revenue recognised.

Our audit procedures over rental income and other property related income 
included obtaining an understanding of the Group’s processes and controls 
around rental income and other property related income recognition.

Rental Income
We performed substantive procedures over rental income. This involved:
•  Obtaining the tenancy schedules for the Group.
•  Setting an expectation of annual rental income per property using the lease 
data in the tenancy schedule and comparing this to the revenue recognised. 
We set a tolerance threshold to assess whether rental income was being 
recorded in line with our expectations.

•  Selecting a sample of lease agreements and agreeing the key lease terms 

input into the tenancy schedule. 

•  In addition, we traced a sample of the lease agreements through to related 

invoices and their cash collections. 

•  We obtained the schedules used to calculate straight-lining of rental income 
and reconciled it to the general ledger. We tested the arithmetical accuracy 
of these schedules, and we agreed on a sample basis the lease information 
in the schedules back to lease agreements.

•  For any lease incentive clauses noted from our inspection of these lease 
agreements, we traced them through to the lease incentive calculation to 
confirm completeness.

Hotel
We performed substantive audit procedures and tested a sample of 
transactions through to invoice and cash collections.

Student accommodation
We performed substantive analytical procedures, this involved:
•  Obtaining the rent roll for student accommodation.
•  Setting an expectation of revenue for the year using the rent roll and 

approved rate cards and compared this to the revenue recognised. We set a 
tolerance threshold to assess whether rental income was being recorded in 
line with our expectations.

•   Selecting a sample of lease agreements and agreed the key lease terms 

input into the rent roll for student accommodation. In addition, we traced a 
sample of the lease agreements through to its related cash collections.

Our application of materiality 

We apply the concept of materiality in planning and performing the audit, in evaluating the effect of identified misstatements on the 
audit and in forming our audit opinion. 

Materiality
The magnitude of an omission or misstatement that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic 
decisions of the users of the financial statements. Materiality provides a basis for determining the nature and extent of our audit procedures.

The table below sets out the materiality, performance materiality and threshold for reporting audit differences applied on our audit:

Overall

Specific materiality 

Parent Company

0.9% of total assets 
(2022: 0.9% of 
total assets)

5% of EPRA earnings 
(2022: 5% of 
EPRA earnings)

0.9% of total assets 
(2022: 0.9% of 
total assets)

BASIS

MATERIALITY

£19.5m 
(2022: £22.5m)

PERFORMANCE 
MATERIALITY

£9.7m 
(2022: £11.2m)

AUDIT DIFFERENCES

£1.0m 
(2022: £1.1m)

£2.0m 
(2022: £2.3m)

£1.0m 
(2022: £1.1m)

£0.1m 
(2022: £0.1m)

£5.5m 
(2022: £3.9m)

£2.8m 
(2022: £1.9m)

£0.3m 
(2022: £0.2m)

109

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONIndependent Auditor’s Report  
to the members of CLS Holdings Plc continued

When establishing our overall audit strategy, we determined a magnitude of uncorrected misstatements that we judged would be 
material for the financial statements as a whole. We determined that an asset-based measure would be the most appropriate basis 
for determining overall materiality given that key users of the Group’s financial statements are primarily focused on the valuation 
of the Group’s assets. Based on this, we determined that it is appropriate to set the overall materiality at 0.9% of Total assets. 

We determined that for rental income, revenue from hotel and student accommodation, administrative expenses and other 
expenses and related balance sheet accounts, a misstatement of less than overall materiality for the financial statements as a 
whole could influence the economic decisions of users.

We determined that materiality for these areas should be based upon 5% of EPRA Earnings as that is considered an important 
performance metric and aligned with industry earnings measures.

This provided a basis for determining the nature, timing and extent of risk assessment procedures, identifying and assessing the 
risk of material misstatement and determining the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures.

During the course of our audit, we reassessed initial materiality to reflect year end balances and this did not result in any 
significant change.

Performance materiality
The application of materiality is at the individual account or balance level. It is set at an amount to reduce to an appropriately low level the 
probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality.

On the basis of our risk assessments, together with our assessment of the Group’s overall control environment, our judgement was 
that performance materiality be set at 50% (2022: 50%) of our planning materiality, namely £9.7m and £1.0m (2022: £11.2m and 
£1.1m) for overall and specific materiality respectively. We have set performance materiality at this percentage based on our risk 
assessment procedures and the likelihood that misstatements may occur within the financial statements. 

Audit work in each region is undertaken based on a percentage of total performance materiality. The performance materiality set 
for each region is based on the relative scale of the region to the Group as a whole and our assessment of the risk of misstatement.  

Reporting threshold
An amount below which identified misstatements are considered as being clearly trivial.

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them all uncorrected audit differences in excess of £1.0m 
(2022: £1.1m), as well as uncorrected audit differences in excess of £0.1m (2022: £0.1m) that related to our testing accounts to 
which we applied the specific materiality. These amounts were set at 5% of planning materiality. We also reported any differences 
below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. 

We evaluate any uncorrected misstatements against both the quantitative measures of materiality discussed above and in light of 
other relevant qualitative considerations in forming our opinion.

Other information 
The other information comprises the information included in the annual report set out on pages 1-103, other than the financial 
statements and our auditor’s report thereon. The Directors are responsible for the other information contained within the 
annual report. 

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in 
this report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. 

Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially 
inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appears to be 
materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to 
determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have 
performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of the other information, we are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

110

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSOpinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006

In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the 
Companies Act 2006.

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:

•  the information given in the Strategic report and the Directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are 

prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and 

•  the Strategic report and the Directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

Matters on which we are required to report by exception

In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and the Parent Company and its environment obtained in the course 
of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the Strategic report or the Directors’ report.

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to 
you if, in our opinion:

•  adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been 

received from branches not visited by us; or

•  the Parent Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement 

with the accounting records and returns; or

•  certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
•  we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.

Corporate Governance Statement

We have reviewed the Directors’ statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate 
Governance Statement relating to the Group and Parent Company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code specified for our review by the Listing Rules.

Aside from the impact of the matters disclosed in the Material uncertainty related to going concern section, based on the work 
undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is 
materially consistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit:

•  Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any material 

uncertainties identified set out on pages 54-55 and 102;

•  Directors’ explanation as to its assessment of the Parent Company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the 

period is appropriate set out on page 54;

•  Director’s statement on whether it has a reasonable expectation that the Group and Parent Company will be able to continue in 

operation and meets its liabilities set out on page 102;

•  Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 103;
•  Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on pages 51-53;
•  The section of the annual report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems set 

out on pages 48-53; and;

•  The section describing the work of the Audit Committee set out on pages 76-80.

111

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONIndependent Auditor’s Report  
to the members of CLS Holdings Plc continued

Responsibilities of directors

As explained more fully in the Directors’ responsibilities statement set out on page 103, the Directors are responsible for the 
preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as 
the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, 
whether due to fraud or error. 

In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Group and Parent Company’s ability to 
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of 
accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no 
realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements 
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material 
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is 
a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a 
material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or 
in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these 
financial statements.

Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud 
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our 
responsibilities, outlined above, to detect irregularities, including fraud. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to 
fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, 
forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting 
irregularities, including fraud is detailed below.

However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both those charged with governance of the 
company and management. 

•  We obtained an understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that are applicable to the Group and determined that the 
most significant that are directly relevant to the presentation of the Annual Report and Accounts are those that relate to the 
reporting framework (UK adopted international accounting standards, the Companies Act 2006 and UK Corporate Governance 
Code). The most significant that indirectly affect the financial statements where non-compliance would have a material effect are 
relevant tax regulations, (including the UK REIT regulations) and laws related to landlords with tenancies. 

•  We understood how CLS Holdings plc is complying with those frameworks by making enquiries of management and by 

identifying the Group’s policies and procedures regarding compliance with laws and regulations. We also identified those 
members of management who have the primary responsibility for ensuring compliance with laws and regulations, and for 
reporting any known instances of non-compliance to those charged with governance. We corroborated our enquiries through our 
review of Board minutes and papers provided to the Board and the Audit Committee, as well as consideration of the results of 
our audit procedures across the Group to either corroborate or provide contrary evidence which was then followed up. 
Our assessment included the tone from the top and the emphasis on a culture of honest and ethical behaviour.

•  We assessed the susceptibility of the financial statements to material misstatement, including how fraud might occur by 
reviewing the Company’s risk register and enquiring with management and the Audit Committee during the planning and 
execution phases of our audit. We considered the programmes and controls that the Group has established to address risks 
identified, or that otherwise prevent, deter and detect fraud; and how management monitors those programmes and controls.

•  Based on this understanding we designed our audit procedures to identify non-compliance with such laws and regulations. 

Our procedures involved; 
 – Enquiry of management, and when appropriate, those charged with governance regarding their knowledge of any non-

compliance or potential non-compliance with laws and regulations that could affect the financial statements;

 – Reading minutes of meetings of those charged with governance;
 – Obtaining and reading correspondence from legal and regulatory bodies, including the FRC, HMRC and the tax authorities in all 

the locations the Group operates in;

 – Journal entry testing, with a focus on journals indicating unusual transactions based on our understanding of the 

business; and

 – Engaged our own specialists to read and assess legal advice taken by management on identified matters of non-compliance 

with laws and regulations and evaluated the adequacy of actions required to remediate non-compliance.

112

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSA further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council’s 
website at https://www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.

Other matters we are required to address 

•  Following the recommendation from the Audit Committee we were appointed by the Company on 28 April 2022 to audit the 

financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2022 and subsequent financial periods.

•  The period of total uninterrupted engagement including previous renewals and reappointments is two years, covering the years 

ended 31 December 2022 to 31 December 2023.

•  The audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the Audit Committee.

Use of our report

This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 
2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to 
state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume 
responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for 
the opinions we have formed.

Peter McIver (Senior statutory auditor)
for and on behalf of Ernst & Young LLP, Statutory Auditor 
London 
8 March 2024

113

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONGroup income statement for the year ended 31 December 2023

Revenue
Costs

Net rental income
Administration expenses
Other property expenses

Operating profit before revaluation and disposals
Net revaluation movements on investment property
Net revaluation movements on equity investments
Profit on sale of investment property

Operating loss

Finance income
Finance costs
Foreign exchange loss
Impairment of goodwill

Loss before tax

Taxation

Loss for the year attributable to equity shareholders

Notes

2023
£m

2022
£m

4

4

12/14

8
9

10

148.7
(35.7)

113.0
(18.2)
(15.6)

79.2
(302.7)
(1.3)
1.4

(223.4)
1.6
(41.3)
(0.3)
–

(263.4)
13.6

(249.8)

139.7
(31.9)

107.8
(15.7)
(16.2)

75.9
(136.5)
(3.8)
0.5

(63.9)
10.1
(26.8)
(0.3)
(1.1)

(82.0)
0.1

(81.9)

Baisc and diluted earnings per share

5/24

(62.9)p

(20.2)p

The notes on pages 119 to 152 are an integral part of these Group financial statements.

114

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
Group statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2023

Loss for the year

Other comprehensive income:
Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss
Revaluation of property, plant and equipment
Foreign exchange differences
Deferred tax on revaluation of property, plant and equipment

Total items that may be reclassified to profit or loss

Total other comprehensive (expense)/income

Notes

26
26
18

2023  
£m

(249.8)

2022  
£m

(81.9)

2.2
(12.3)
(0.6)

(10.7)

(10.7)

1.9
28.5
(0.4)

30.0

30.0

Total comprehensive expense for the year attributable to equity shareholders

(260.5)

(51.9)

The notes on pages 119 to 152 are an integral part of these Group financial statements.

115

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONGroup balance sheet at 31 December 2023

Non-current assets

Investment properties
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Equity investments
Deferred tax
Derivative financial instruments

Current assets

Trade and other receivables
Derivative financial instruments
Cash and cash equivalents

Assets held for sale

Total assets

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables
Current tax
Borrowings

Non-current liabilities

Deferred tax
Borrowings
Leasehold liabilities

Total liabilities

Net assets

Equity

Share capital
Share premium
Other reserves
Retained earnings

Total equity

Notes

2023 
£m

2022  
£m

12
13

18
20

15
20
16

14

17

19

18
19

23

26

1,850.5
41.8
2.9
1.4
–
3.6

1,900.2

16.7
0.7
70.6

88.0

172.7

2,295.0
39.6
2.8
2.7
2.8
8.5

2,351.4

15.8
–
113.9

129.7

20.3

2,160.9

2,501.4

(68.6)
(0.3)
(193.9)

(262.8)

(88.7)
(876.7)
(3.5)

(58.6)
(2.0)
(173.4)

(234.0)

(110.5)
(932.5)
(3.6)

(968.9)

(1,046.6)

(1,231.7)

(1,280.6)

929.2

1,220.8

11.0
83.1
106.7
728.4

929.2

11.0
83.1
115.4
1,011.3

1,220.8

The financial statements of CLS Holdings plc (registered number: 02714781) were approved by the Board of Directors and 
authorised for issue on 8 March 2024 and were signed on its behalf by:

Mr F Widlund 
Chief Executive Officer 

Mr A Kirkman
Chief Financial Officer

The notes on pages 119 to 152 are an integral part of these Group financial statements.

116

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
Group statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 2023

Arising in 2023:
Total comprehensive expense for the year

Share-based payments
Dividends to shareholders
Transfer of fair value on property, plant and equipment

Total changes arising in 2023
At 1 January 2023

At 31 December 2023

Arising in 2022:
Total comprehensive expense for the year

Share-based payments

Dividends to shareholders
Transfer of fair value on property, plant and equipment
Purchase of own shares

Total changes arising in 2022
At 1 January 2022

At 31 December 2022

Share  
capital  
£m 

 Note 23

Share  
premium  
£m 

–
–
–
–

–
11.0

11.0

–
–
–
–

–
83.1

83.1

Share  
capital  
£m 

 Note 23

Share  
premium  
£m 

Other  
reserves  
£m 

 Note 26

(10.7)
0.5
–
1.5

(8.7)
115.4

106.7

Other  
reserves  
£m 

 Note 26

Retained  
earnings  
£m

Total equity  
£m

(249.8)
–
(31.6)
(1.5)

(260.5)
0.5
(31.6)
–

(282.9)
1,011.3

(291.6)
1,220.8

728.4

929.2

Retained  
earnings  
£m

Total equity  
£m

–
–

–
–
–

–
11.0

11.0

–
–

–
–
–

–
83.1

83.1

30.0
0.2

–
(3.5)
–

26.7
88.7

(81.9)
–

(32.4)
3.5
(25.8)

(51.9)
0.2

(32.4)
–
(25.8)

(136.6)
1,147.9

(109.9)
1,330.7

115.4

1,011.3

1,220.8

The notes on pages 119 to 152 are an integral part of these Group financial statements.

117

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONGroup statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 December 2023

Cash flows from operating activities
Cash generated from operations
Interest received
Interest paid
Income tax paid on operating activities

Net cash inflow from operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of investment properties
Capital expenditure on investment properties
Proceeds from sale of properties
Income tax paid on sale of properties
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
Purchase of intangibles
Repayment of vendor loan
Foreign currency loss on forward contracts

Net cash outflow from investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities
Dividends paid
Purchase of own shares
New loans
Issue costs of new loans
Repayment of loans

Net cash outflow from financing activities

Cash flow element of net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Foreign exchange loss

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

The notes on pages 119 to 152 are an integral part of these Group financial statements.

Notes

27

25

16

2023
£m

83.2
1.6
(35.1)
(3.8)

45.9

–
(46.4)
17.0
(1.8)
(0.8)
(0.3)
–
–

(32.3)

(31.6)
–
129.1
(1.1)
(152.6)

(56.2)

(42.6)
(0.7)

(43.3)
113.9

70.6

2022
£m

70.5
1.3
(24.2)
(4.6)

43.0

(83.4)
(57.2)
56.2
(3.2)
(0.4)
(0.8)
7.7
(0.2)

(81.3)

(32.4)
(25.8)
144.1
(1.1)
(99.4)

(14.6)

(52.9)
(0.6)

(53.5)
167.4

113.9

118

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
Notes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023

1. General information
CLS Holdings plc (the ‘Company’ or ‘Ultimate Parent’) and its subsidiaries (together ‘CLS Holdings’ or the ‘Group’) is an investment 
property group which is principally involved in the investment, management and development of commercial properties. The Group’s 
principal operations are carried out in the United Kingdom, Germany and France.

The Company is an incorporated public limited company and is registered and incorporated in the United Kingdom. Its registration 
number is 02714781, with its registered address at 16 Tinworth Street, London SE11 5AL. The Company is listed on the London Stock 
Exchange and domiciled in the United Kingdom. The Company did not change its name during the year ended 31 December 2023 
or the year ended 31 December 2022.

2. Material accounting policies
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these Group financial statements are set out below. These policies 
have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.

2.1 Basis of preparation
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and United Kingdom 
adopted International Accounting Standards and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs).

Going concern
Background
CLS’ strategy and business model include regular secured loan refinancings, and capital deployment and recycling through 
acquisitions, capital expenditure and disposals. Over the last thirty years, the Group has successfully navigated several periods of 
economic uncertainty, including the recent economic stress resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and 
the cost-of-living crisis.

The Group continues to have very high rent collection and low bad debts, and has a long-term track record in financing and 
refinancing debt including £330.6 million completed in 2023 and a further £103.2 million subsequent to year end, of which 
£88.5 million has been executed and £14.7 million for which credit approval has been obtained by lenders or terms have 
been agreed.

The Directors note that the interim financial information for the six months ended 30 June 2023 contained disclosure of a Material 
Uncertainty related to going concern due to the timing and amounts of the planned refinancing of debt and disposals of property 
being then outside of Management’s control. In this context the Directors set out their considerations and conclusions in respect of 
going concern for these financial statements below.

Going concern period and basis
The Group’s going concern assessment covers the period to 31 July 2025 (“the going concern period”). The period chosen takes into 
consideration the maturity date of loans totalling £311.3 million that expire by July 2025. The going concern assessment uses the 
business plan approved by the Board at its November 2023 meeting as the Base case. The assessment also considers a Severe but 
plausible case.

Forecast cash flows – Base case
The forecast cash flows prepared for the Base case reflect the challenging economic backdrop and include assumptions regarding 
forecast forward interest curves, inflation and foreign exchange, and includes revenue growth, principally from contractual 
increases in rent, and increasing cost levels in line with forecast inflation. 

The Base case is focussed on the cash and working capital position of the Group throughout the going concern period. In this 
regard, the Base case assumes continued access to lending facilities in the UK, Germany and France, and specifically that debt 
facilities of £311.3 million expiring within the going concern period will be refinanced as expected (£261.5 million) or will be repaid 
(£49.8 million), some of which are linked to forecast property disposals. The Board acknowledges that these refinancings are not 
fully within its control; however, they are confident that refinancings or extensions of these loans will be executed within the 
required timeframe, having taken into account: 

•  existing banking relationships and ongoing discussions with the lenders in relation to these refinancings; 
•  CLS’ track record of prior refinancings, particularly in the 12 months to 31 December 2023 when £330.6 million was successfully 

refinanced or extended; and

•  recent refinancings subsequent to the year end that have been executed, credit approved by lenders, or where the terms have 

been agreed, totalling £103.2 million of the £311.3 million noted above.

The Base case also includes property disposals in the going concern period in line with the Group’s business model and the 
forecast cash flows approved by the Board in November 2023. The Board acknowledges that property disposals are not fully within 
its control; however, they are confident these transactions will be completed within the going concern period, based on their 
history of achieving disposals (with disposals of £73.5m achieved since 2022). The value of the properties available for disposal is 
significantly in excess of the value of the debt maturing during the going concern period.

119

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION2. Material accounting policies continued
2.1 Basis of preparation – continued
Going concern continued
Forecast cash flows – Base case continued
The Group’s financing arrangements contain Loan to Value (‘LTV’), Interest Cover Ratio (‘ICR’) and Debt Service Coverage Ratio 
(‘DSCR’) covenants. In the Base case, minimal cure payments have been forecast given that the Group’s expects to maintain its 
compliance with the covenant requirements.

The near-term impacts of climate change risks within the going concern period have been considered in both the Base and the 
Severe but plausible case and are expected to be immaterial. 

Forecast cash flows – Severe but plausible case
A Severe but plausible case has been assessed which has been produced by flexing key assumptions further including: lower 
rents, increased service charges, higher property and administration expenses, falling property values, higher interest rates and 
reduced achievements of refinancings and disposals. 

These flexed assumptions are more severe than CLS experienced during the 2007-2009 global financial crisis and other downturns 
such as that experienced in 2020-2022 during the Covid-19 pandemic. A key assumption in this scenario is a reduction in property 
values of 10% until December 2024, impacting forecast refinancings, sales and cash cures. This is in addition to the reduction 
experienced of 12.5% in 2023 and 17.1% since June 2022.

Assumptions around refinancing and investment property disposals are adjusted to only include those agreed or considered 
significantly advanced by management. In addition, a reduction in property values of 10% results in additional cure payments of 
£12.1 million being necessary for the Group to remain in compliance with its covenant requirements.

Due to the severity of the assumptions used in this scenario, which is severe but plausible and therefore not remote, the liquidity of 
the Group is exhausted even after putting in place controllable mitigating actions as set out below.

Mitigating actions
In the Severe but plausible case, CLS is assumed to take mitigating actions in terms of depositing cash to equity cure some loans, 
scaling back uncommitted capital expenditure (without impacting revenue streams over the going concern period) and reducing 
the dividend to the Property Income Distribution required under the UK REIT rules as well as drawing its existing £50 million of 
currently unutilised facilities. If needed, further disposals could be considered as there are no sale restrictions on CLS’ £2.1 billion 
of properties, albeit the timing and the amount of these potential disposals are not in the Group’s control.

Additionally, the Directors note that the properties that require refinancing in the going concern period are on a non-recourse basis 
to the Group. Accordingly, in extremis, the lender could enforce their security on an individual property with no claim on the rest of 
the Group’s assets.

Material Uncertainty related to going concern
As described above, the Group is reliant for liquidity purposes upon its ability to both refinance the debt maturing and to complete 
a number of property disposals in the going concern period in more challenging market conditions.

Whilst the Directors remain confident, due to the reasons highlighted above, that a combination of sufficient refinancings and 
property disposals will be achieved, the timing and value of both the planned refinancing of facilities falling due within the going 
concern review period, and planned property disposals, is outside of management’s control and consequently a material 
uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s and Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Notwithstanding this material uncertainty on the going concern assumption, given our track-record and reputation, the Directors 
are confident that the debt falling due for repayment in the going concern period will be refinanced or settled in line with their 
plans for the reasons set out above, rather than requiring repayment on maturity, or will be extinguished as part of property 
disposals in the period. In extremis, the loans requiring refinancing are provided on a non-recourse basis. Therefore, the Directors 
continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing these Group and Company financial statements.

The financial statements do not contain the adjustments that would result if the Group and Company were unable to continue as a 
going concern.

120

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued2. Material accounting policies continued
2.1 Basis of preparation – continued
Historical cost and fair value
The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for investment and other properties and financial 
instruments that are measured at fair values at the end of each reporting period, as explained in the accounting policies below. 
Historical cost is generally based on fair value of the consideration given in exchange for goods and services. Fair value is the price 
that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at 
the measurement date, regardless of whether that price is directly observable or estimated using another valuation technique. 

Presentational and functional currency
The consolidated financial statements, including the results and financial position, are presented in pounds Sterling, which is 
the functional and presentational currency of CLS Holdings plc.

The amounts presented in the financial statements are rounded to the nearest £0.1 million.

New standards and interpretations
In the current year, the Group has applied a number of new standards and amendments to IFRSs issued by the International 
Accounting Standards Board (IASB) that are mandatorily effective for an accounting period that begins on or after 1 January 2023. 
Their adoption has not had any material impact on the disclosures or on the amounts reported in these financial statements. 
These new standards and amendments are listed below: 

•  Amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2 – Disclosure of accounting policies
•  Amendments to IAS 8 – Definition of Accounting Estimates
•   Amendments to IAS 12 – Deferred tax related to assets and liabilities arising from a single transaction
•  Amendments to IAS 12 – International tax reform – Pillar Two model rules
•  IFRS 17 – Insurance Contracts

At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, the Group has not applied the following new and revised IFRSs that 
have been issued but are not yet effective:

•  Amendments to IAS 1 – Classification of liabilities as current or non current
•  Amendments to IAS 7 and IFRS 7 – Disclosures: Supplier finance arrangements
•  Amendments to IFRS10 and IAS 28 – Sale or contribution of assets between an investor and its associate or joint venture
•  Amendments to IFRS 16 – Lease liability in a sale and leaseback
•  Amendments to IAS 21 – Lack of exchangeability

Pillar Two legislation has been enacted or substantively enacted in certain jurisdictions in which the Group operates. However, the 
legislation does not apply to Group as its consolidated revenue is lower than £750 million.

The Directors do not expect that the adoption of the standards listed above will have a material impact on the financial statements 
of the Group in future periods.

2.2 Business combinations
Where property is acquired, via corporate acquisitions or otherwise, management considers the substance of the assets and 
activities of the acquired entity in determining whether the acquisition represents the acquisition of a business. The Group 
determines that it has acquired a business when the acquired set of activities and assets/liabilities include an input and a 
substantive process that, together, significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs i.e. rental income and capital 
appreciation. The acquired process is considered substantive if it is critical to the ability to continue earn rental income and drive 
capital appreciation, and the inputs acquired include an organised workforce with the necessary skills, knowledge, or experience 
to perform that process or it significantly contributes to the ability to continue producing rental income and drive capital 
appreciation and is considered unique or scarce or cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort, or delay in the ability to 
continue producing rental income and capital appreciation.

Where such acquisitions are not determined to be an acquisition of a business, they are not treated as business combinations. 
Rather, the cost to acquire the corporate entity or assets and liabilities is allocated between the identifiable assets and liabilities 
of the entity based on their relative fair values at the acquisition date. 

(I) Subsidiary undertakings
Subsidiaries are all entities (including structured entities) over which the Group has control. The Group controls an entity when the 
Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns 
through its power over the entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. 
They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases.

121

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION2. Material accounting policies continued
2.2 Business combinations – continued
(II) Goodwill
Goodwill arising on consolidation represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the Group’s interest in the fair value 
of identifiable assets and liabilities of a subsidiary or associate at the date of acquisition in a business combination. It is initially 
recognised as an asset at cost and is subsequently measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill which 
is recognised as an asset is reviewed for impairment at least annually.

2.3 Assets held for sale
Assets (and disposal groups) classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs 
to sell, except for investment properties held for sale which are measured at fair value.

Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered through a sale 
transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable and the 
asset (or disposal group) is available-for-sale in its present condition. Management must be committed to the sale which should 
be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification.

When the Group is committed to a sale plan involving loss of control of a subsidiary, all of the assets and liabilities of that 
subsidiary are classified as held for sale when the criteria above are met, regardless of whether the Group will retain a  
non-controlling interest in its former subsidiary after sale.

2.4 Foreign currency
(I) Foreign currency transactions
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into Sterling using the exchange rate prevailing at the date of the transaction. 
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated into Sterling at the 
exchange rate ruling at that date, and differences arising on translation are recognised in the income statement.

For financial assets measured at fair value through profit and loss, exchange differences are recognised in the income statement 
in the ‘finance costs or finance income’ line item.

(II) Consolidation of foreign entities
The results and financial position of all Group entities which have a functional currency different from Sterling are translated 
into Sterling as follows:

(a) assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate at the date of the balance sheet;
(b) income and expenses for each income statement are translated at the average exchange rates; and
(c) all resulting exchange differences are recognised directly in equity in the cumulative translation reserve.

2.5 Investment properties
Investment property comprises principally offices that are not occupied substantially for use by, or in the operations of, the Group, 
nor for sale in the ordinary course of business, but are held primarily to earn rental income and for capital appreciation. 
These buildings are substantially rented to tenants and not intended to be sold in the ordinary course of business.

Investment properties are measured initially at cost, including directly attributable transaction costs. Transaction costs include 
transfer taxes and professional fees for legal and other services. Additions to investment properties comprise costs of a capital 
nature; in the case of investment properties under development, these include capitalised interest and certain staff costs directly 
attributable to the management of the development. Capitalised interest is calculated at the rate on associated borrowings applied 
to expenditure on the development between the date of gaining planning consent and the date of practical completion. 

The Group recognises sales and purchases of investment property when control passes on completion of the contract. Gains  
or losses on the sale of properties are calculated by reference to the carrying value at the end of the previous year, adjusted for 
subsequent capital expenditure.

Investment properties are carried at fair value, based on market value as determined by professional external valuers at 
the balance sheet date. Investment properties being redeveloped for continuing use as investment properties, or for which 
the market has become less active, continue to be classified as investment properties and measured at fair value. Changes in fair 
values are recognised in the income statement.

Transfers are made to (or from) investment property only when there is evidence of a change in use.

Lease incentives are not held as separate assets or liabilities on the balance sheet but are instead included within the investment 
property balance.

122

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued2. Material accounting policies continued
2.6 Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is measured initially at cost, being the consideration paid, including related transaction costs. 
Property is subsequently measured at fair value, based on market value as determined by professional external valuers at 
the balance sheet date. Fixtures and fittings and head office fit-out are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation 
and any impairment loss.

Any increase arising on the revaluation of land and buildings held as property, plant and equipment is credited to the fair value 
reserve via other comprehensive income, except to the extent that it reverses a revaluation decrease for the same asset previously 
recognised as an expense, in which case the increase in value is credited to the income statement to the extent the decrease was 
previously expensed. On disposal of an asset the revaluation reserve relating to that asset becomes realised and is transferred in 
equity to retained earnings. 

Land is not depreciated. Depreciation on the property, plant and equipment that is depreciated is calculated using the straight-line 
method to allocate cost less estimated residual values over the estimated useful lives or lease length, as follows: 

Fixtures and fittings
Head Office fit-out
Hotel

4–5 years
10 years
250 years

An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected 
to arise from the continued use of the asset. The gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an asset is determined as 
the difference between the sale proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and is recognised in the income statement.

2.7 Financial instruments
(I) Derivative financial instruments
The Group uses derivative financial instruments, including swaps and interest rate caps, to help manage its interest rate and 
foreign exchange rate risks. Derivative financial instruments are initially recorded at, and subsequently revalued to, fair value. 
Revaluation gains and losses are recognised in finance income or finance cost in the income statement.

(II) Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss (FVTPL)
Financial assets at FVTPL are measured at fair value. Revaluation gains and losses are recognised in the income statement. 

(III) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, demand deposits and other short-term highly liquid investments which 
are readily convertible to a known amount of cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.

(IV) Trade and other receivables/Trade and other payables
Trade and other receivables are recognised initially at their transaction price if they do not contain any significant financing 
components. Subsequently they are measured at amortised cost with a recognised loss allowance for expected credit losses 
which is measured at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit loss. Trade and other payables are stated at transaction 
price which is approximate to their fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost.

(V) Borrowings
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value less attributable transaction costs. Subsequently, borrowings are stated 
at amortised cost with any difference between the amount initially recognised and the redemption value being recognised in the 
income statement over the period of the borrowings, using the effective interest rate method.

When debt refinancing occurs, existing liabilities are treated as being extinguished when the new liability is substantially different 
from the existing liability. To determine if a liability is substantially different, the Group considers the transaction as a whole, taking 
into account both qualitative and quantitative characteristics.

Borrowing costs attributable to the construction of a qualifying asset are capitalised at the weighted average borrowing rate for 
the applicable region on direct expenditure incurred between the date of gaining planning consent and the date of 
practical completion.

123

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION2. Material accounting policies continued
2.8 Revenue
The Group’s revenue includes rental income, service charge income and other property related income.

(I) Rental income
Rental income from operating leases is recognised on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Direct costs associated with 
securing the rental income are also recognised on a straight-line basis over the lease term. 

Fixed or contractually defined rental increases, which can take the form of actual amounts or agreed percentages, are recognised 
on a straight-line basis over the term. Rental increases related to a price index are recognised when the increase takes place.

Lease incentives being offered to tenants to enter into a lease, such as an initial rent-free period or a cash contribution to fit out or 
similar costs, are part of the net consideration for the use of the property and are therefore recognised on the same straight-line basis. 

Where the total consideration due under a lease is modified, for example to remove a break or extend the term, the revised 
remaining consideration due is recognised on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the lease. Lease modifications are 
accounted for from the effective date of modification. Initial direct costs associated with the original lease continue to be 
recognised and amortised over the remaining term of the modified lease.

(II) Service charge income
Service charge income relates to expenditure that is directly recoverable from tenants and is recognised in the period in which 
it is earned as tenants benefit from the services based on actual service charge costs incurred.

(III) Other property income
Other property income relates to income from the Group’s student accommodation and hotel in addition to dilapidations receipts 
and surrender premiums.

Income from the Group’s student accommodation relates to rents received from tenants for the provision of student 
accommodation. Income is recognised on a straight-line basis over the lease term. See rental income policy for more detail.

Hotel revenue is recognised as the rooms are occupied and services rendered. Where the supply of service has only been partially 
completed at the balance sheet date, turnover represents the value of the service provided to date based on a portion of the contract value.

Dilapidations income is payable by tenants when the Group agrees with the tenant to perform required remedial works to 
fulfil the contractual obligations of the lease. Dilapidation income is recognised when the amounts become contractually due, 
usually at the time an agreement between parties is reached. Surrender premiums are payable when a lease is terminated prior to 
expiry. Surrender premiums for the early termination of a lease are recognised as revenue when the amounts become 
contractually due. 

2.9 Taxation
Current tax is based on taxable profit for the year and is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted 
by the balance sheet date.

Deferred tax is provided using the balance sheet liability method on temporary differences between the carrying value of assets 
and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the values used for tax purposes. Temporary differences are not provided for 
when they arise from initial recognition of goodwill or from the initial recognition of assets and liabilities in a transaction that 
does not affect accounting or taxable profit and does not give rise to equal taxable and deductible temporary differences.

The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount 
of assets and liabilities, and is calculated using rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or 
the asset is realised, in the tax jurisdiction in which the temporary differences arise. 

124

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued2. Material accounting policies continued
2.9 Taxation – continued
Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which 
the assets can be used. The deferred tax assets and liabilities are only offset if they relate to income taxes levied by the same 
taxation authority, there is a legally enforceable right of set-off and the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities 
on a net basis.

Current and deferred tax are recognised in the income statement except when they relate to items that are recognised in other 
comprehensive income or directly in equity, in which case the current and deferred tax are also recognised in other comprehensive 
income or equity respectively.

The group has applied the exemption in IAS 12 ‘Income Taxes’ to recognising and disclosing information about deferred tax assets 
and liabilities related to Pillar Two income taxes.

2.10 Leases
The Group as a lessor
Leases where the Group does not transfer substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset are classified 
as operating leases.

The Group as a lessee
The Group recognises lease liabilities to make lease payments and right-of-use assets representing the right to use the underlying 
assets for all leases, except for short-term leases and leases of low-value assets.

(I) Lease liabilities
At the commencement date of the lease, the Group recognises lease liabilities measured at the present value of lease payments to 
be made over the lease term which, if in respect of investment property, forms part of the cost of that property on initial recognition. 
The lease payments include fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments) less any lease incentives receivable, variable 
lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, and amounts expected to be paid under residual value guarantees. The lease 
payments also include the exercise price of a purchase option reasonably certain to be exercised by the Group and payments of 
penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the Group exercising the option to terminate. Variable lease payments 
that do not depend on an index or a rate are recognised as expenses (unless they are incurred to produce inventories) in the period 
in which the event or condition that triggers the payment occurs.

In calculating the present value of lease payments, the Group uses either the borrowing rate of the loan attached to the property 
at the lease commencement date or, if the property is not financed, then the operating segment’s incremental borrowing rate at 
the lease commencement date because the interest rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable. After the commencement 
date, the amount of lease liabilities is increased to reflect the accretion of interest and reduced for the lease payments made. 
In addition, the carrying amount of lease liabilities is remeasured if there is a modification, a change in the lease term, a change 
in the lease payments (e.g. changes to future payments resulting from a change in an index or rate used to determine such lease 
payments) or a change in the assessment of an option to purchase the underlying asset. 

(II) Right-of-use assets
The Group recognises right-of-use assets at the commencement date of the lease (i.e. the date the underlying asset is available for use). 
The Group leases properties that meet the definition of investment property. These right-of-use assets are presented as part of the line 
item ‘Investment property’ in the statement of financial position.

(III) Short-term leases and low value assets
The Group applies the short-term lease recognition exemption to its short-term leases of equipment (i.e. those leases that have 
a lease term of 12 months or less from the commencement date and do not contain a purchase option). It also applies the lease 
of low-value assets recognition exemption to leases of office equipment that are considered to be low value. Lease payments 
on short-term leases and leases of low-value assets are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

125

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION3. Accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty
Accounting judgements
In accordance with IAS 1, the Directors have considered the judgements that have been made in the process of applying the Group’s 
accounting policies, which are described in note 2, and which of those judgements have the most significant effect on amounts 
recognised in the financial statements. 

Going Concern
For the purposes of the going concern assessment, the Group makes judgements in determining future cash flows which are 
based on assumptions. The most significant judgements relate to the terms and ability to refinance loan facilities and recycle 
capital. These judgements are made by management based on recent performance, external factors and management’s 
knowledge and expertise of cashflow drivers. See note 2 for more details.

Key sources of estimation uncertainty
Valuation of properties
The Group uses the valuations performed by its independent external valuers as the fair value of its investment properties and 
those properties held at valuation and classified as property, plant and equipment. The valuations are based upon assumptions 
including market rentals (‘ERV’), future development costs and an appropriate equivalent yield and capitalisation rates as 
appropriate (see notes 12 and 13 for more detail). The valuers also make reference to market evidence of transaction prices for 
similar properties.

Other estimates
Climate change
In preparing the financial statements, the Group has considered the impact of climate change, taking into account the relevant 
disclosures in the Strategic Report, including those made in accordance with the recommendations of the Taskforce on Climate 
Related Financial Disclosure (see pages 41 to 47). These considerations included the limited exposure in terms of our properties 
to potential physical climate risks along with a commitment to invest £65 million in our Net Zero Carbon pathway. On this basis, 
the Group has concluded that climate change did not have a material impact on the financial reporting judgements and estimates, 
consistent with the assessment that this is not expected to have a significant impact on the Group’s going concern or viability 
assessment. The Group considers that this will remain the case until approximately 2030 after which the differing climate 
scenarios diverge resulting in different risk profiles, the impact and mitigations of which will be captured in the Climate 
Resilience strategy being developed (see page 32 for more detail).

126

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued4. Segment information
Each property represents an operating segment which the Group aggregates into two reporting segments with similar characteristics 
– investment properties and other investments. Other investments comprise the hotel at Spring Mews and other small corporate 
investments. Central administration relates to the operating costs of the Group’s headquarters and are not allocated to any reporting 
segment. The Group manages the investment properties division on a geographical basis due to its size and geographical diversity. 
Consequently, the Group’s principal reporting segments are: 

Investment properties:

Other investments

United Kingdom 
Germany
France

Year ended 31 December 2023

Rental income
Other property-related income
Service charge income

Revenue
Service charges and similar expenses

Net rental income
Administration expenses
Other property expenses

Revenue less costs
Net revaluation movements on investment property
Net revaluation movements on equity investments
Profit/(loss) on sale of investment property

Segment operating (loss)/profit
Finance income
Finance costs
Foreign exchange gain/(loss)

Segment (loss)/profit before tax

Investment properties

2023

United
Kingdom
£m

46.4
8.9
13.4

68.7
(16.3)

52.4
(7.5)
(8.6)

36.3
(186.6)
–
0.4

(149.9)
0.1
(25.2)
–

(175.0)

Germany  
£m

France  
£m

Other
investments
£m

Central 
administration
£m

43.2
0.6
11.7

55.5
(14.0)

41.5
(3.2)
(4.2)

34.1
(90.6)
–
(1.6)

(58.1)
–
(11.9)
–

(70.0)

13.2
0.9
4.9

19.0
(5.4)

13.6
(1.3)
(0.4)

11.9
(25.5)
–
(0.1)

(13.7)
–
(4.0)
0.1

(17.6)

–
5.5
–

5.5
–

5.5
(0.1)
(2.4)

3.0
–
(1.3)
2.7

4.4
1.5
–
(0.4)

5.5

–
–
–

–
–

–
(6.1)
–

(6.1)
–
–
–

(6.1)
–
(0.2)
–

(6.3)

Total  
£m

102.8
15.9
30.0

148.7
(35.7)

113.0
(18.2)
(15.6)

79.2
(302.7)
(1.3)
1.4

(223.4)
1.6
(41.3)
(0.3)

(263.4)

127

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION4. Segment information continued

Year ended 31 December 2022

Rental income
Other property-related income
Service charge income

Revenue
Service charges and similar expenses

Net rental income
Administration expenses
Other expenses

Revenue less costs
Net revaluation movements on investment property
Net revaluation movements on equity investments
(Loss)/profit on sale of investment property

Segment operating loss
Finance income
Finance costs
Foreign exchange loss
Impairment of goodwill

Segment loss before tax

Other segment information

Investment properties
United Kingdom
Germany
France

Other investments

Investment properties

United
Kingdom
£m

Germany  
£m

France  
£m

48.5
8.2
11.2

67.9
(13.1)

54.8
(6.4)
(8.1)

40.3
(79.6)
–
(0.3)

(39.6)
5.3
(16.4)
–
–

(50.7)

38.0
0.2
11.3

49.5
(14.1)

35.4
(2.8)
(4.2)

28.4
(41.5)
–
–

(13.1)
1.4
(6.8)
–
(0.3)

(18.8)

12.9
–
4.5

17.4
(4.7)

12.7
(1.4)
(0.7)

10.6
(15.4)
–
0.8

(4.0)
1.4
(2.4)
–
(0.8)

(5.8)

2022

Other
investments

£m

–
4.9
–

4.9
–

4.9
(0.2)
(3.2)

1.5
–
(3.8)
–

(2.3)
2.0
(0.8)
–
–

(1.1)

Central 
administration
£m

–
–
–

–
–

–
(4.9)
–

(4.9)
–
–
–

(4.9)
–
(0.4)
(0.3)
–

(5.6)

Total  
£m

99.4
13.3
27.0

139.7
(31.9)

107.8
(15.7)
(16.2)

75.9
(136.5)
(3.8)
0.5

(63.9)
10.1
(26.8)
(0.3)
(1.1)

(82.0)

Assets

Liabilities

Capital expenditure

2023  
£m

2022 
£m

2023  
£m

2022  
£m

2023  
£m

2022  
£m

930.0
908.1
265.0
57.8

2,160.9

1,083.6
1,011.6
294.3
111.9

2,501.4

548.2
510.8
164.3
8.4

551.7
536.4
185.7
6.8

1,231.7

1,280.6

37.2
9.3
3.1
0.8

50.4

36.6
9.8
11.7
0.4

58.5

128

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued5. Alternative Performance Measures
Alternative Performance Measures (‘APMs’) should be considered in addition to, and are not intended to be a substitute for, 
or superior to, IFRS measurements.

Introduction
The Group has applied the October 2015 European Securities and Markets Authority (‘ESMA’) guidelines on APMs and the 
October 2021 Financial Reporting Council (‘FRC’) thematic review of APMs in these results, whilst noting the International 
Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) 2016 guidance and ESMA’s December 2019 report on the use of APMs.  
An APM is a financial measure of historical or future financial performance, position or cash flows of the Group which 
is not a measure defined or specified in IFRS.

Overview of our use of APMs
The Directors believe that APMs assist in providing additional useful information on the underlying trends, performance and 
position of the Group. APMs assist our stakeholder users of the accounts, particularly equity and debt investors, through the 
comparability of information across the European real estate sector. APMs are used by the Directors and management, both 
internally and externally, for performance analysis, strategic planning, reporting and incentive-setting purposes.

APMs are not defined by IFRS and therefore may not be directly comparable with other companies’ APMs, including peers in 
the real estate industry. There are two sets of APMs which we utilise (EPRA APMs and similar CLS APMs) which are reconciled 
where possible to statutory measures on the following pages.

CLS monitors the Group’s financial performance using APMs which are European Public Real Estate Association (‘EPRA’) measures 
as these are a set of standard disclosures for the property industry and thus aid comparability for our stakeholder users. CLS considers 
the two measures below to be the most relevant as we believe that these will continue to reflect the long-term nature of our 
property investments most accurately.

•  EPRA earnings; and
•  EPRA net tangible asset value (NTA).

There has been no change to the Group’s APMs in the year with the same APMs utilised by the business being defined, calculated 
and used on a consistent basis, although all other measures are shown within the supplementary unaudited disclosures to the financial 
statements there has been no change to comparative amounts.

1. EPRA APMs

For use in earnings per share calculations

Weighted average number of ordinary shares in circulation

Diluted number of ordinary shares

For use in net asset per share calculations

2023  
Number

2022  
Number

397,330,507

404,410,051

400,942,040

406,473,292

Number of ordinary shares in circulation at 31 December

397,410,268

397,210,866

i) Earnings – EPRA earnings

Loss for the year
Net revaluation movement on investment property

Deferred tax on revaluations

Net revaluation movement on equity investments
Profit on sale of investment property

Current tax thereon

Movement in fair value of derivative financial instruments
Impairment of goodwill
Amortisation of intangible assets

EPRA earnings

Basic and diluted earnings per share

EPRA earnings per share

Notes

12/14

8/9

2023
£m

(249.8)
302.7
(16.3)
1.3
(1.4)
–
4.2
–
0.2

40.9

(62.9)p

10.3p

2022
£m

(81.9)
136.5
(4.8)
3.8
(0.5)
1.6
(8.8)
1.1
–

47.0

(20.2)p

11.6p

129

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION5. Alternative Performance Measures continued
ii) Net asset value measures

2023

Net assets
Other intangibles
Fair value of fixed interest debt

Tax thereon

Deferred tax on revaluation surplus
Adjustment for short-term disposals
Fair value of financial instruments
Purchasers’ costs1

2023

2022

IFRS
NAV
£m

929.2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

EPRA
NTA
£m

929.2
(2.9)
–
–
90.0
(6.6)
(4.3)
–

EPRA
NRV  
£m

929.2
–
–
–
90.0
–
(4.3)
147.7

EPRA
NDV  
£m

929.2
–
56.7
(3.3)
–
–
–
–

IFRS
NAV
£m

1,220.8
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

EPRA
NTA
£m

1,220.8
(2.8)
–
–
108.6
(8.6)
(8.5)
–

EPRA
NRV  
£m

EPRA
NDV  
£m

1,220.8
–
–
–
108.6
–
(8.5)
149.3

1,220.8
–
87.2
(6.4)
–
–
–
–

929.2

1,005.4

1,162.6

982.6

1,220.8

1,309.5

1,470.2

1,301.6

Per share

233.8p

253.0p

292.5p

247.2p

307.3p

329.6p

370.1p

327.7p

1  EPRA NTA and EPRA NDV reflect IFRS values which are net of purchasers’ costs. Purchasers’ costs are added back when calculating EPRA NRV.

6. Loss for the year
Loss for the year has been arrived at after charging/(crediting): 

Auditor’s remuneration: Fees payable to the Company’s Auditor for:

Audit of the Parent Company and Group accounts
Audit of the Company’s subsidiaries pursuant to legislation

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
Amortisation of intangible assets
Employee benefits expense
Foreign exchange loss
Provision against trade receivables

Notes

13

7

15

2023 
£m

0.5
0.2
0.6
0.2
12.1
0.3
–

2022 
£m

0.4
0.2
0.6
–
10.2
0.3
0.6

Other services provided to the Group by the Company’s Auditor consisted of the 2023 interim review of £76k (2022: £50k) and the 
provision of access to a technical financial reporting database of £1k (2022: £1k).

7. Employee benefits expense

Wages and salaries
Social security costs
Pension costs – defined contribution plans
Performance incentive plan
Other employee-related expenses

2023  
£m

2022  
£m

7.6
1.4
0.3
1.2
1.6

7.3
0.8
0.3
0.8
1.0

12.1

10.2

The Directors are considered to be the only key management of the Group. Information on Directors’ emoluments, share options 
and interests in the Company’s shares is given in the Remuneration Committee Report on pages 81 to 99.

The monthly average number of employees of the Group in continuing operations, including Executive Directors, was as follows:

Property 
Number

50
48

98

2023

Hotel 
Number

11
9

20

Total  
Number

Property 
Number

61
57

118

47
46

93

2022

Hotel 
Number

9
7

16

Total  
Number

56
53

109

Male
Female

130

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued8. Finance income

Interest income

Financial instruments carried at amortised cost

Movement in fair value of derivative financial instruments

9. Finance costs

Interest expense

Secured bank loans
Secured notes

Amortisation of loan issue costs

Total interest costs
Movement in fair value of derivative financial instruments

Total finance costs

10. Taxation

Corporation tax 

Current year charge
Adjustments in respect of prior years

Deferred tax (see note 18) 

Origination and reversal of temporary differences

Tax credit for the year

2023 
£m

2022  
£m

1.6
–

1.6

1.3
8.8

10.1

2023  
£m

2022  
£m

35.5
–
1.6

37.1
4.2

41.3

2023  
£m

5.6
(1.9)

3.7

(17.3)

(17.3)

(13.6)

23.3
1.7
1.8

26.8
–

26.8

2022  
£m

5.8
(0.5)

5.3

(5.4)

(5.4)

(0.1)

A deferred tax charge of £0.6 million (2022: charge of £0.4 million) was recognised directly in equity (note 18). The charge for the 
year differs from the theoretical amount which would arise using the weighted average tax rate applicable to profits of Group 
companies as follows:

Loss before tax

Expected tax credit at applicable tax rate
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes
Non-deductible loss from REIT
Deferred tax on losses not recognised
Adjustments in respect of prior years
Other

Tax credit for the year

2023  
£m

(263.4)

(56.3)
0.3
42.9
3.7
(3.8)
(0.4)

 (13.6)

2022  
£m

(82.0)

(15.1)
1.0
13.4
1.2
(0.5)
(0.1)

(0.1)

The weighted average applicable tax rate of 21.4% (2022: 18.5%) was derived by applying to their relevant profits and losses the rates 
in the jurisdictions in which the Group operated. The standard UK rate of corporation tax applied to profits is 25% (2022: 19%).

131

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION11. Property portfolio

Investment property
Property held as property, plant and equipment
Properties held for sale

Property portfolio at 31 December 2023

Investment property
Property held as property, plant and equipment
Properties held for sale

Property portfolio at 31 December 2022

12. Investment property

At 1 January 2023
Acquisitions
Capital expenditure
Disposals
Net revaluation movement
Lease incentive adjustments
Exchange rate variances
Transfer to properties held for sale

At 31 December 2023

At 1 January 2022
Acquisitions
Capital expenditure
Disposals
Net revaluation movement
Lease incentive adjustments
Exchange rate variances
Transfer to properties held for sale

At 31 December 2022

Notes

12
13
14

Notes

12
13
14

United 
Kingdom 
£m

836.3
36.3
47.3

919.9

United 
Kingdom 
£m

1,030.0
33.6
7.0

1,070.6

United 
Kingdom 
£m

1,030.0
–
37.2
(3.7)
(186.1)
(0.3)
–
(40.8)

836.3

United 
Kingdom 
£m

1,090.5
–
36.6
(11.5)
(79.5)
0.9
–
(7.0)

1,030.0

Germany  
£m

France  
£m

Total  
£m

768.2
1.7
115.6

885.5

246.0
1.7
9.8

257.5

1,850.5
39.7
172.7

2,062.9

Germany  
£m

France  
£m

Total  
£m

990.5
2.0
3.6

996.1

274.5
1.9
9.7

286.1

2,295.0
37.5
20.3

2,352.8

Germany  
£m

France  
£m

Total
investment
properties  
£m

2,295.0
–
49.6
(10.3)
(302.2)
1.1
(26.0)
(156.7)

274.5
–
3.1
–
(25.5)
(0.2)
(5.7)
(0.2)

246.0

1,850.5

990.5
–
9.3
(6.6)
(90.6)
1.6
(20.3)
(115.7)

768.2

Germany  
£m

France  
£m

883.0
83.4
9.9
–
(41.6)
6.9
48.9
–

990.5

273.6
–
11.7
–
(15.4)
–
14.3
(9.7)

274.5

Total
investment
properties  
£m

2,247.1
83.4
58.2
(11.5)
(136.5)
7.8
63.2
(16.7)

2,295.0

Investment properties included leasehold properties with a carrying amount of £65.1 million (2022: £77.7 million). 

Interest capitalised within capital expenditure in the year amounted to £1.0 million (2022: £0.5 million).

132

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued12. Investment property continued 
The property portfolio which comprises investment properties, properties held for sale (note 14), and hotel and other, detailed 
in note 13, was revalued at 31 December 2023 to its fair value. Valuations were based on current prices in an active market for 
all properties. The property valuations were carried out by independent external valuers as follows:

Cushman and Wakefield
Jones Lang LaSalle
Directors’ valuation

Investment 
property
2023  
£m

Other 
property
2023  
£m

Property 
portfolio
2023  
£m

Investment 
property
2022 
£m

Other 
property
2022 
£m

836.3
1,014.2
–

1,850.5

83.6
128.8
–

212.4

919.9
1,143.0
–

2,062.9

1,030.0
1,265.0
–

2,295.0

33.6
13.5
3.6

50.7

Property 
portfolio
2022  
£m

1,063.6
1,278.5
3.6

2,345.7

The total fees, including the fees for this assignment, earned by each of the valuers from the Group is less than 5% of their total 
revenues in each jurisdiction.

Valuation process
The Group’s property portfolio was valued by independent external valuers on the basis of fair value using information provided 
to them by the Group such as current rents, terms and conditions of lease agreements, service charges and capital expenditure. 
This information is derived from the Group’s property management systems and is subject to the Group’s overall control environment. 
The valuation reports are based on assumptions and valuation models used by the external valuers. The assumptions are typically 
market related, such as yields and discount rates, and are based on professional judgement and market evidence of transactions 
for similar properties on arm’s length terms. The valuations are prepared in accordance with RICS Valuation – Global standards.

Each Country Head, who reports to the Chief Executive Officer, verifies all major inputs to the external valuation reports, assesses 
the individual property valuation changes from the prior year valuation report and holds discussions with the external valuers. 
When the process is complete, the valuation report is recommended to the Audit Committee and the Board, which considers 
it as part of its overall responsibilities.

Valuation techniques
The fair value of the property portfolio (excluding ongoing developments, see below) has been determined using the following 
approaches in accordance with RICS Valuation – Global Standards: 

United Kingdom an income capitalisation approach whereby contracted and market rental values are capitalised with a market 

Germany
France

capitalisation rate
a 10 year discounted cash flow model with an assumed exit thereafter
both the market capitalisation approach and a 10 year discounted cash flow approach

The resulting valuations are cross-checked against the equivalent yields and the fair market values per square foot derived 
from comparable recent market transactions on arm’s length terms. Other factors taken into account in the valuations include 
the tenure of the property, tenancy details, and ground and structural conditions.

Ongoing developments are valued under the ‘residual method’ of valuation, which is the same method as the income capitalisation 
approach to valuation described above, with a deduction for all costs necessary to complete the development, including a notional 
finance cost, together with a further allowance for remaining risk. As the development approaches completion, the valuer may 
consider the income capitalisation approach to be more appropriate.

All valuations have considered the environmental, social and governance credentials of the properties and the potential cost 
of improving them to local regulatory standards along with the broader potential impact of climate change.

These techniques are consistent with the principles in IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement and use significant unobservable inputs 
such that the fair value measurement of each property within the portfolio has been classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

There were no transfers between any of the Levels in the fair value hierarchy during either 2023 or 2022. The Group determines 
whether transfers have occurred between levels in the fair value hierarchy by re-assessing categorisation at the end of each 
reporting period.

Gains and losses recorded in profit or loss for recurring fair value measurements categorised within Level 3 of the fair value 
hierarchy amount to a loss of £302.7 million (2022: a loss of £136.5 million) and are presented in the income statement in the 
line item ‘Net movements on revaluation of investment properties’. The revaluation gain for the property, plant and equipment 
of £2.2 million (2022: gain of £1.9 million) was included within the revaluation reserve via other comprehensive income.

133

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION12. Investment property continued
All gains and losses recorded in profit or loss in 2023 and 2022 for recurring fair value measurements categorised within Level 3 
of the fair value hierarchy are attributable to changes in unrealised gains or losses relating to investment property held at 
31 December 2023 and 31 December 2022, respectively.

Quantitative information about investment property fair value measurement using unobservable inputs (Level 3)

ERV

Equivalent yield

UK
Germany
France

Average

Range

Average

2023
£ per sq. ft

2022
£ per sq. ft

2023
£ per sq. ft

2022
£ per sq. ft

34.76
14.40
21.96

34.01 10.00-56.05 10.00-58.09
14.10
9.93-29.70 10.14-25.27
21.69 12.99-43.53 13.26-41.38

2023
%

6.08
5.24
6.00

Range

2023
%

2.98-13.23
4.40-6.20
4.79-7.40

2022
%

2.94-9.61
3.30-5.90 
4.05-6.75

2022
%

5.61
4.75
5.13

Sensitivity of measurement to variations in the significant unobservable inputs
All other factors remaining constant, an increase in estimated rental value ‘ERV’ would increase valuations, whilst an increase in 
the equivalent yield would result in a fall in value, and vice versa. There are inter-relationships between these inputs as they are 
partially determined by market conditions. An increase in the reversionary yield may accompany an increase in ERV and would 
mitigate its impact on the fair value measurement.

A decrease in the equivalent yield by 25 basis points would result in an increase in the fair value of the Group’s investment 
property by £84.8 million (2022: £138.5 million) whilst a 25 basis point increase would reduce the fair value by £85.4 million 
(2022: £107.0 million). A decrease in the ERV by 5% would result in a decrease in the fair value of the Group’s investment property 
by £79.0 million (2022: £86.8 million) whilst an increase in the ERV by 5% would result in an increase in the fair value of the 
Group’s investment property by £70.7 million (2022: £106.5 million). 

Where the Group leases out its investment property under operating leases the duration is typically three years or more. 
No material variable contingent rents have been recognised in the current or prior year.

Sustainability, climate change, Net Zero Carbon Pathway and EPC compliance
In August 2021, the Group published its Sustainability Strategy which includes a pathway to achieve Net Zero Carbon (“NZC”) 
emissions by 2030 (see pages 37 to 38). Our NZC Pathway is underpinned by individual property energy audits, undertaken by 
technical experts, which identify energy and carbon saving opportunities. At today’s costs, the investment required to upgrade all 
our assets to meet our SBTi-aligned NZC target amounts to an estimated £65 million over the 10-year period between 2021 and 
2030, with over £15 million spent since 2021. We have integrated the energy audits into individual Asset Management Plans to 
enable strategic decisions about the refurbishment, sale or full redevelopment of our assets to be made. Additional audits are 
undertaken as and when required (e.g. when a property enters the portfolio) to ensure the robust delivery of the Pathway across 
the Group’s portfolio. Progress against our NZC Pathway, including an update on, is detailed in our separate Sustainability Report. 
The UK portfolio is already compliant with the 2023 Minimum Energy Efficiency Standard (MEES) requirements, whilst further 
upgrades are scheduled to ensure our properties achieve the expected target of EPC B by 2030. In France, our Asset Management 
Plans will ensure we meet the Décret Tertiaire requirements and although there are currently no minimum targets for existing 
buildings in Germany, our NZC Pathway will see our alignment with the Carbon Risk Real Estate Monitor (“CRREM”) energy and 
carbon intensity pathways, by 2030, across all three regions.

134

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued13. Property, plant and equipment

Cost or valuation
At 1 January 2022 
Additions
Disposals
Reclassification to held for sale
Revaluation
Exchange rate variances

At 31 December 2022
Additions
Disposals
Reclassification to held for sale
Reclassification (to)/from fixtures and fittings
Revaluation
Exchange rate variances

At 31 December 2023

Comprising:
At cost
At valuation

Accumulated depreciation and impairment
At 1 January 2022
Depreciation charge
Disposals
Revaluation

At 31 December 2022
Depreciation charge
Disposals
Revaluation

At 31 December 2023

Net book value

At 31 December 2023

At 31 December 2022

Hotel  
£m

Land and 
buildings  
£m

Owner- 
occupied 
property  
£m

Fixtures  
and fittings  
£m

25.0
–
–
–
1.7
–

26.7
0.5
–
–
(0.2)
3.2
–

30.2

–
30.2

30.2

–
(0.1)
–
0.1

–
(0.1)
–
0.1

–

30.2

26.7

3.2
–
–
(3.6)
0.4
–

–
–
–
–
–
–
–

–

–
–

–

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–

–

–

–

11.0
0.1
–
–
(0.4)
0.1

10.8
–
–
–
–
(1.2)
(0.1)

9.5

–
9.5

9.5

–
(0.1)
–
0.1

–
(0.1)
–
0.1

–

9.5

10.8

3.2
0.3
(0.1)
–
–
0.1

3.5
0.3
–
–
0.2
–
(0.1)

3.9

3.9
–

3.9

(1.1)
(0.4)
0.1
–

(1.4)
(0.4)
–
–

(1.8)

2.1

2.1

Total  
£m

42.4
0.4
(0.1)
(3.6)
1.7
0.2

41.0
0.8
–
–
–
2.0
(0.2)

43.6

3.9
39.7

43.6

(1.1)
(0.6)
0.1
0.2

(1.4)
(0.6)
–
0.2

(1.8)

41.8

39.6

135

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION13. Property, plant and equipment continued
Valuation techniques
The fair value of the hotel and owner-occupied property has been determined using the following approach in accordance 
with International Valuation Standards: 

Hotel

a 10 year discounted cash flow model with an assumed exit thereafter. The projected EBITDA in 
the 11th year is capitalised at a market yield before being brought back to present day values.

Owner – 
occupied property

an income capitalisation approach whereby contracted and market rental values are capitalised with a 
market capitalisation rate

This technique is consistent with the principles in IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement and uses significant unobservable inputs 
such that the fair value measurement of the hotel within the portfolio has been classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Sensitivity of measurement to variations in the significant unobservable inputs
All other factors remaining constant, an increase in EBITDA would increase the valuation, whilst an increase in exit capitalised 
yield would result in a fall in value, and vice versa. A decrease in the exit capitalisation yield by 100 basis points would result in 
an increase in the fair value of the hotel by £5.5 million, whilst a 100 basis point increase would reduce the fair value by 
£4.0 million. A decrease in EBITDA by 5% would result in a decrease in the fair value of the hotel by £1.5 million whilst an increase 
in the EBITDA by 5% would result in an increase in the fair value of the hotel by £1.5 million.

14. Assets held for sale

At 1 January
Disposals
Transfer from investment property
Transfer from property, 
plant and equipment
Revaluation
Exchange rate variances

At 31 December

2023

2022

UK 
£m

Germany 
£m

France 
£m

7.0
–
40.8

–
(0.5)
–

47.3

3.6
(3.6)
115.6

–
–
–

115.6

9.7
–
0.3

–
–
(0.2)

9.8

Total 
£m

20.3
(3.6)
156.7

–
(0.5)
(0.2)

172.7

UK 
£m

Germany 
£m

France 
£m

37.3
(37.3)
7.0

–
–
–

7.0

–
–
–

3.6
–
–

3.6

6.9
(6.9)
9.7

–
–
–

9.7

Total 
£m

44.2
(44.2)
16.7

3.6
–
–

20.3

The balance above comprises 6 properties (2022: 3 properties) that at the year end were being marketed for sale and are expected 
to be disposed of within 12 months via an open market process. The properties are situated in the UK, Germany and France. 
The directors expect that the sale proceeds achieved to be similar to their carrying amounts.

15. Trade and other receivables

2023  
£m

2022  
£m

8.8
4.4
1.4
2.1

5.3
4.9
2.7
2.9

16.7

15.8

Current
Trade receivables
Other receivables
Prepayments
Accrued income 

136

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued15. Trade and other receivables continued
Trade receivables are shown after deducting a provision of £1.9 million (2022: £2.8 million) which is calculated as an expected 
credit loss. The movements in this provision were as follows:

At 1 January
Debt write-offs
Charge to the income statement

At 31 December

2023  
£m

2022  
£m

2.8
(0.9)
–

1.9

2.4
(0.2)
0.6

2.8

The Group uses a provision matrix to calculate the expected credit loss for trade receivables. The provision rates are based 
on the Group’s historical observed aging of debt and the probability of default. At every reporting date, the provision rates are 
updated to incorporate the previous 12 months data and forward-looking information such as actual and potential impacts of 
political and economic uncertainty, if applicable. In addition, on a tenant-by-tenant basis, the Group takes into account any recent 
payment behaviours and future expectations of likely default events. Specific provisions are made in excess of the expected credit 
loss where information is available to suggest a higher provision is required, for example individual customer credit ratings, actual 
or expected insolvency filings or company voluntary arrangements, likely deferrals of payments due, agreed rent concessions and 
market expectations and trends in the wider macro-economic environment in which our customers operate. An additional review 
of tenant debtors was undertaken to assess recoverability in light of the political and economic uncertainty.

The Directors consider that the carrying amount of trade and other receivables is approximate to their fair value. There is no 
concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables as the Group has a large number of customers who are paying 
their rent in advance. Further details about the Group’s credit risk management practices are disclosed in note 21.

16. Cash and cash equivalents

Cash at bank

2023  
£m

70.6

2022  
£m

113.9

At 31 December 2023, cash at bank included £26.1 million (2022: £15.8 million) which was restricted by a third-party charge. 
£10.7 million of the restricted cash related to tenant deposits (2022: £10.3 million).

17. Trade and other payables

Current
Trade payables
Social security and other taxes
Tenant deposits
Other payables
Deferred income
Accruals

2023  
£m

2022  
£m

4.1
2.2
10.7
5.7
20.5
25.4

68.6

4.6
2.1
10.3
4.2
13.0
24.4

58.6

137

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION18. Deferred tax

At 1 January 2022
(Credited)/charged

to income statement
to OCI1

Exchange rate variances

At 31 December 2022
Charged/(credited)

to income statement
to OCI1

Exchange rate variances

At 31 December 2023

1  Other Comprehensive Income.

Liabilities

Assets

UK capital 
allowances 
£m

Fair value 
adjustments 
to properties 
£m

0.3

107.8

–
–
–

0.3

0.4
–
–

0.7

(4.9)
0.4
5.3

108.6

(17.0)
0.6
(2.3)

89.9

Other 
£m

1.8

(0.2)
–
–

1.6

(0.1)
–
–

1.5

Total 
£m

109.9

(5.1)
0.4
5.3

110.5

(16.7)
0.6
(2.3)

92.1

UK capital 
allowances 
£m

Losses 
£m

–

–
–
–

–

–
–
–

–

(2.4)

(0.3)
–
0.1

(2.6)

(0.7)
–
–

(3.3)

Total 
deferred
tax
£m

107.3

(5.4)
0.4
5.4

107.7

(17.3)
0.6
(2.3)

88.7

Total
£m

(2.6)

(0.3)
–
0.1

(2.8)

(0.6)
–
–

(3.4)

Other
£m

(0.2)

–
–
–

(0.2)

0.1
–
–

(0.1)

Deferred tax has been calculated based on local rates applicable under local legislation substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.

Deferred tax assets are recognised in respect of tax losses carried forward to the extent that the realisation of the related tax 
benefit through future taxable profits is probable. At 31 December 2023 the Group offset tax losses valued at the applicable local 
tax rate of £12.8 million (2022: £9.8 million) against the deferred tax liability arising on the fair value adjustments to properties. 
At 31 December 2023 the Group did not recognise deferred tax assets of £13.2 million (2022: £8.0 million) in respect of losses 
amounting to £76.1 million (2022: £45.6 million) which may be carried forward and utilised against future taxable income or gains. 
There is no expiry period for the carried forward tax losses.

19. Borrowings

At 31 December 2023

At 31 December 2022

Current  
£m

Non-current 
£m

Total 
borrowings 
£m

Current  
£m

Non-current 
£m

Total 
borrowings 
£m

Secured bank loans

193.9

876.7

1,070.6

173.4

932.5

1,105.9

Issue costs of £5.0 million (2022: £5.3 million) have been offset in arriving at the balances in the above tables.

Secured bank loans
Interest on bank loans is charged at fixed rates ranging between 0.8% and 5.1% including margin (2022: 0.8% and 4.4%) and 
at floating rates of typically SONIA or EURIBOR plus a margin. Floating rate margins range between 1.1% and 2.8% (2022: 1.1% 
and 2.2%). The bank loans are secured by legal charges over £1,988.8 million (2022: £2,247.6 million) of the Group’s properties, 
and in most cases a floating charge over the remainder of the assets held in the company which owns the property. In addition, 
the share capital of some of the subsidiaries within the Group has been charged.

138

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued19. Borrowings continued
Secured green loans
The Group’s debt portfolio includes two sustainability linked loans;

•  £150.7m maturing in 2032
•  £59.4m maturing in 2033

These loans have a basis point margin incentive for meeting annual sustainability targets which align with our Net Zero Carbon 
Pathway for the properties which are securing them. The targets have been independently verified to be aligned with the Loan 
Market Association (LMA) Sustainability-Linked loan principles. The targets set for any given year are based on actual ESG  
data/milestones achieved in the prior year. Each of the 2023 targets (tested on 31 December 2022 actual results) have been 
met resulting in lower interest rates being applied to these loans. The reduction in interest rate margin is not considered to 
be a substantial modification of the loan terms.

Capitalised interest
Interest capitalised within investment property capital expenditure during the year was £1.0 million (2022: £0.5 million) 
at an average rate of 4.26% (2022: 3.22%).

The Group has complied with all externally imposed capital requirements to which it was subject.

The maturity profile of the carrying amount of the Group’s borrowings was as follows:

At 31 December 2023

Maturing in:
Within one year or on demand
One to two years
Two to five years
More than five years

Unamortised issue costs

Borrowings
Due within one year

Due after one year

Secured  
bank loans  
£m

195.4
327.0
331.0
222.2

1,075.6
(5.0)

1,070.6
(193.9)

876.7

At the year ended 31 December 2022 £175.1 million of borrowings were due for repayment within one year and £350.1 million, was 
due within one to two years including unamortised issue costs. During 2023, CLS refinanced £330.6 million of which £129.1 million 
was classified as new loans.

At 31 December 2022

Maturing in:
Within one year or on demand
One to two years
Two to five years
More than five years

Unamortised issue costs

Borrowings
Due within one year

Due after one year

Secured  
bank loans  
£m

175.1
350.1
314.4
271.6

1,111.2
(5.3)

1,105.9
(173.4)

932.5

139

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION19. Borrowings continued
The carrying amounts of the Group’s borrowings are denominated in the following currencies:

At 31 December 2023

At 31 December 2022

Total 
£m

Sterling  
£m

Fixed rate financial liabilities
Floating rate financial liabilities – swaps

Total fixed rate

Floating rate financial liabilities – capped 
Floating rate financial liabilities

Total floating rate

Unamortised issue costs

Borrowings

Sterling  
£m

238.9
115.3

354.2

–
159.9

159.9

514.1
(3.3)

510.8

Euro 
£m

462.4
–

462.4

40.6
58.5

99.1

561.5
(1.7)

701.3
115.3

816.6

40.6
218.4

259.0

1,075.6
(5.0)

559.8

1,070.6

241.3
117.4

358.7

–
162.2

162.2

520.9
(3.5)

517.4

Euro  
£m

445.8
–

445.8

42.6
101.9

144.5

590.3
(1.8)

588.5

Total 
£m

687.1
117.4

804.5

42.6
264.1

306.7

1,111.2
(5.3)

1,105.9

Of the Group’s total borrowings, 76% (2022: 72%) are considered fixed rate borrowings.

At 31 December 2023, the Group had interest rate swap agreements in place with an aggregate notional amount of £115.3 million 
(2022: £117.4 million) whereby the Group pays an average fixed rate of interest of 1.89% and receives interest at a daily variable 
rate. The swap is being used to hedge the exposure to changes in the variable rate of sterling denominated loans.

The interest rate risk profile of the Group’s borrowings was as follows:

At 31 December 2023

Fixed rate financial liabilities
Floating rate financial liabilities – swaps

Floating rate financial liabilities – capped 
Floating rate financial liabilities 

Gross borrowings

At 31 December 2022

Fixed rate financial liabilities
Floating rate financial liabilities – swaps

Floating rate financial liabilities – capped 
Floating rate financial liabilities 

Gross borrowings

Weighted average interest rate1

Weighted average life

Sterling  
%

Euro 
%

Total 
%

Sterling  
Years

Euro  
Years

Total 
Years

2.7
4.7

3.3

–
7.1

7.1

4.5

2.5
–

2.5

2.6
5.2

4.2

2.8

2.5
4.7

2.8

2.6
6.6

6.0

3.6

7.4
4.7

5.3

–
1.6

1.6

4.1

2.8
–

2.8

3.8
2.9

3.3

2.9

4.4
1.0

3.9

3.8
1.9

2.2

3.5

Weighted average interest rate1

Weighted average life

Sterling  
%

Euro 
%

Total 
%

Sterling  
Years

Euro  
Years

Total 
Years

2.7
3.2

2.9

–
4.8

4.8

3.5

1.6
–

1.6

2.5
3.5

3.2

2.0

2.0
3.2

2.2

2.5
4.3

4.1

2.7

8.4
1.4

6.1

–
1.4

1.4

4.6

3.0
–

3.0

4.8
2.5

3.1

3.0

4.9
1.4

4.4

4.8
1.8

2.2

3.8

1  The weighted average interest rate are based on the nominal value of the debt facilities.

140

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued19. Borrowings continued
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Group’s borrowings are as follows:

Current borrowings
Non-current borrowings

Carrying amounts

Fair values

2023  
£m

193.9
876.7

2022  
£m

173.4
932.5

2023  
£m

193.9
820.0

2022  
£m

173.4
845.3

1,070.6

1,105.9

1,013.9

1,018.7

The valuation methods used to measure the fair values of the Group’s fixed rate borrowings were derived from inputs which were 
either observable as prices or derived from prices taken from Bloomberg (Level 2).

The Group had the following undrawn committed facilities available at 31 December:

Floating rate:

– expiring within one year
– expiring after one year1

2023  
£m

–
50.0

50.0

2022 
£m

30.0
–

30.0

1   £30 million of this facility is secured on selected UK properties.

In addition to the above committed facility, the Group has £nil of uncommitted facilities available (2022: £20 million).

Contractual undiscounted cash outflows 
The tables below show the contractual undiscounted cash outflows arising from the Group’s gross debt.

At 31 December 2023

Secured bank loans

Interest payments on borrowings1

Effect of interest rate swaps

Effect of interest rate caps

Gross loan commitments

At 31 December 2022

Secured bank loans

Interest payments on borrowings1

Effect of interest rate swaps

Gross loan commitments

Less than  
1 year  
£m

195.3

39.4

(2.8)

(0.8)

1 to 2  
years  
£m

327.0

32.8

(0.6)

(0.4)

231.1

358.8

Less than  
1 year  
£m

1 to 2  
years  
£m

175.1

350.1

35.3

(3.9)

26.5

(2.6)

2 to 3  
years  
£m

75.5

14.9

–

(0.3)

90.1

2 to 3  
years  
£m

121.6

14.3

–

206.5

374.0

135.9

3 to 4  
years  
£m

135.7

12.3

–

(0.1)

4 to 5  
years  
£m

119.8

8.2

–

–

Over  
5 years  
£m

Total
£m

222.2

1,075.5

17.6

125.2

–

–

(3.4)

(1.6)

147.9

128.0

239.8

1,195.8

3 to 4  
years  
£m

54.9

11.3

–

66.2

4 to 5  
years  
£m

137.9

9.4

–

Over  
5 years  
£m

271.6

25.2

–

Total
£m

1,111.2

122.1

(6.5)

147.3

296.8

1,226.7

1   Interest payments on borrowings are calculated without taking into account future events. Floating rate interest is estimated using a future interest rate curve 

as at 31 December.

141

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION20. Derivative financial instruments

Non-current:
Interest rate caps and swaps
Current:
Forward foreign exchange contracts

2023 
Assets 
£m

2023 
Liabilities 
£m

2022 
Assets 
£m

2022 
Liabilities 
£m

3.6

0.7

4.3

–

–

–

8.5

–

8.5

–

–

–

The valuation methods used to measure the fair value of all derivative financial instruments were derived from inputs which were 
either observable as prices or derived from prices (Level 2).

There were no derivative financial instruments accounted for as hedging instruments.

Interest rate caps
The aggregate notional principal of interest rate caps at 31 December 2023 was £40.8 million (2022: £42.7 million). The average 
period to maturity of these interest rate caps was 2.7 years (2022: 3.7 years).

Interest rate swaps
The aggregate notional principal of interest rate swap contracts at 31 December 2023 was £115.3 million (2022: £117.4 million). 
The average period to maturity of these interest rate swaps was 0.9 years (2022: 1.4 years). 

Forward foreign exchange contracts
The Group uses forward foreign exchange contracts from time to time to add certainty to, and to minimise the impact of foreign 
exchange movements on, committed cash flows. At 31 December 2023 and 31 December 2022 the Group had no outstanding 
foreign  exchange contracts.

Derivative financial instruments cash flows
The following table provides an analysis of the anticipated contractual cash flows for the derivative financial instruments using 
undiscounted cash flows. These amounts represent the gross cash flows of the derivative financial instruments and are settled 
as either a net payment or receipt.

2023 
Assets 
£m

2023 
Liabilities 
£m

2022 
Assets 
£m

2022 
Liabilities 
£m

3.8
1.0
0.3
0.1
–
–

5.2

–
–
–
–
–
–

–

4.3
3.5
0.8
0.6
0.1
–

9.3

–
–
–
–
–
–

–

Maturing in:
Less than 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years

142

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued21. Financial instruments
Categories of financial instruments
Financial assets of the Group comprise: interest rate caps; foreign currency forward contracts; financial assets at fair value through 
other comprehensive income or fair value through profit and loss; trade and other receivables; and cash and cash equivalents.

Financial liabilities of the Group comprise: interest rate swaps; forward foreign currency contracts; bank loans; secured notes; 
and trade and other payables.

The fair values of financial assets and liabilities are determined as follows:

(a) Interest rate swaps and caps are measured at the present value of future cash flows based on applicable yield curves derived 

from quoted interest rates;

(b) Foreign currency options and forward contracts are measured using quoted forward exchange rates and yield curves derived 

from quoted interest rates matching maturities of the contracts;

(c) The fair values of non-derivative financial assets and liabilities with standard terms and conditions and traded on active liquid 
markets are determined with reference to quoted market prices. Financial assets in this category include financial assets at 
fair value through other comprehensive income or fair value through profit and loss such as equity investments;

(d) In more illiquid conditions, non-derivative financial assets are valued using multiple quotes obtained from market makers 
and from pricing specialists. Where the spread of prices is tightly clustered the consensus price is deemed to be fair value. 
Where prices become more dispersed or there is a lack of available quoted data, further procedures are undertaken such 
as evidence from the last non-forced trade; and

(e) The fair values of other non-derivative financial assets and financial liabilities are determined in accordance with generally 

accepted pricing models based on discounted cash flow analysis, using prices from observable current market transactions 
and dealer quotes for similar instruments.

Except for fixed rate loans, the carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities recorded at amortised cost approximate to their 
fair value.

Capital risk management
The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities within the Group will be able to continue as going concerns while maximising 
the return to stakeholders through the optimisation of debt and equity balances. The capital structure of the Group consists of debt, 
cash and cash equivalents and equity attributable to the owners of the parent, comprising issued capital, reserves and retained 
earnings. Management perform “stress tests” of the Group’s business model to ensure that the Group’s objectives can be met and 
these objectives were met during 2023 and 2022.

The Directors review the capital structure on a quarterly basis to ensure that key strategic goals are being achieved. As part of this 
review they consider the cost of capital and the risks associated with each class of capital.

The gearing ratio at the year end was as follows:

Debt
Liquid resources

Net debt (A)

Equity (B)

Net debt to equity ratio (A/B)

Notes

19
16

2023  
£m

1,075.6
(70.6)

1,005.0

2022  
£m

1,111.2
(113.9)

997.3

929.2

1,220.8

108.2%

81.7%

Debt is defined as long-term and short-term borrowings before unamortised issue costs as detailed in note 19. Liquid resources 
are cash and short-term deposits. Equity includes all capital and reserves of the Group attributable to the owners of the Company.

143

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION21. Financial instruments continued
Externally imposed capital requirement
The Group was subject to externally imposed capital requirements to the extent that debt covenants may require Group companies 
to maintain ratios such as debt to equity (or similar) below certain levels.

Risk management objectives
The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks, which can be grouped as:

•  market risk;
•  credit risk; and
•  liquidity risk.

The Group’s overall risk management approach seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the Group’s financial performance 
whilst maintaining flexibility.

Risk management is carried out by the Group’s treasury department in close co-operation with the Group’s operating units and 
with guidance from the Board of Directors. The Board regularly assesses and reviews the financial risks and exposures of 
the Group.

(a) Market risk
The Group’s activities expose it primarily to the financial risks of changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, 
and to a lesser extent other price risk such as inflation. The Group enters into a variety of derivative financial instruments to 
manage its exposure to interest rate and foreign currency risk and also uses natural hedging strategies such as matching the 
duration, interest payments and currency of assets and liabilities. There has been no change to the Group’s exposure to market 
risks or the manner in which these risks are managed and measured.

(I) Interest rate risk
The Group’s most significant interest rate risk arises from its long-term variable rate borrowings. Interest rate risk is regularly 
monitored by the treasury department and by the Board on both a country and a Group basis. The Board’s policy is to mitigate 
variable interest rate exposure whilst maintaining the flexibility to borrow at the best rates and with consideration to potential 
penalties on termination of fixed rate loans. To manage its exposure the Group uses interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and 
natural hedging from cash held on deposit.

In assessing risk, a range of scenarios is taken into consideration such as refinancing, renewal of existing positions, and alternative 
financing and hedging. Under these scenarios, the Group calculates the impact on the income statement for a defined movement in 
the underlying interest rate. The impact of a reasonably likely movement in interest rates, based on historic trends, is set out below:

Scenario

Cash +50 basis points
Variable borrowings (including swaps and caps) +50 basis points
Cash -50 basis points
Variable borrowings (including swaps and caps) -50 basis points

2023 
Income 
statement & 
equity 
£m

0.4
(2.6)
(0.4)
1.3

2022 
Income 
statement 

& equity        

£m

0.6
(0.9)
(0.6)
1.5

An increase or decrease of 100 basis points on the cash balance would result in a gain/(loss) of £0.7 million/(£0.7 million) from cash 
and cash equivalents. An increase of 100 basis points on variable borrowings would result in a loss of £1.3 million and a decrease 
of 100 basis points on variable borrowings would result in a gain of £2.6 million.

(II) Foreign exchange risk
The Group does not have any regular transactional foreign exchange exposure. However, it has operations in Europe which transact 
business denominated in Euros and, to a minimal extent, in Swedish krona. Consequently, there is currency exposure caused by 
translating into Sterling the local trading performance and net assets for each financial period and balance sheet, respectively.

The policy of the Group is to match the currency of investments with the related borrowing, which reduces foreign exchange risk 
on property investments. A portion of the remaining operations, equating to the net assets of the foreign property operations, is 
not hedged except in exceptional circumstances. Where foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions, the 
Group will hedge the future committed commercial transaction using foreign exchange swaps or forward foreign exchange contracts.

144

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued21. Financial instruments continued
The Group’s principal currency exposure is in respect of the Euro. If the value of Sterling were to increase or decrease in strength 
the Group’s net assets and profit for the year would be affected. The impact of a reasonably likely movement in exchange rates 
is set out below: 

Scenario

1% increase in value of Sterling against the Euro
1% fall in value of Sterling against the Euro

2023 
Net  
assets  
£m

(5.1)
5.2

2023  
Profit  
before tax  
£m

0.9
(0.9)

2022 
Net  
assets  
£m

(6.0)
6.1

2022  
Profit  
before tax  
£m

0.3
(0.3)

A 10% increase in the value of the Sterling against the Euro would result in a decrease in net assets of £47.1 million and reduction 
of profit before tax of £8.1 million. A 10% decrease in the value of the Sterling against the Euro would result in an increase in net 
assets of £57.5 million and an increase of profit before tax of £9.9 million. The sensitivity disclosed related to the foreign operations, 
as the sensitivity related to financial instruments is not considered significant.

(b) Credit risk
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group. 
Credit risk arises from the ability of customers to meet outstanding receivables and future lease commitments, and from financial 
institutions with which the Group places cash and cash equivalents, and enters into derivative financial instruments. The maximum 
exposure to credit risk is partly represented by the carrying amounts of the financial assets which are carried in the balance sheet, 
including derivatives with positive fair values.

For credit exposure other than to occupiers, the Directors believe that counterparty risk is minimised to the fullest extent possible 
as the Group has policies which limit the amount of credit exposure to any individual financial institution.

The Group has policies in place to ensure that rental contracts are made with customers with an appropriate credit history. 
Credit risk to customers is assessed by a process of internal and external credit review, and is reduced by obtaining bank 
guarantees from the customer or its parent, and cash rental deposits. At 31 December 2023, the Group held £10.7 million in 
rent deposits (2022: £10.3 million) against £8.8 million of trade receivables (2022: £5.3 million). The overall credit risk in relation 
to customers is monitored on an ongoing basis. Moreover, a significant proportion of the Group portfolio is let to Government 
occupiers which can be considered financially secure.

Credit risk also arises from cash and cash equivalents and deposits with banks and financial institutions. For banks and financial 
institutions, only independently rated parties with a minimum rating of investment grade are accepted.

At 31 December 2023 the Group held £4.3 million (2022: £8.5 million) of financial assets at fair value through profit and loss. 
Management considers the credit risk associated with individual transactions and monitors the risk on a continuing basis. 
Information is gathered from external credit rating agencies and other market sources to allow management to react to any 
perceived change in the underlying credit risk of the instruments in which the Group invests. This allows the Group to minimise 
its credit exposure to such items and at the same time to maximise returns for shareholders.

(c) Liquidity risk 
Liquidity risk management requires maintaining sufficient cash, other liquid assets and the availability of funding to meet short, 
medium and long-term requirements. The Group maintains adequate levels of liquid assets to fund operations and to allow 
the Group to react quickly to potential risks and opportunities. Management monitors rolling forecasts of the Group’s liquidity 
on the basis of expected cash flows so that future requirements can be managed effectively.

The majority of the Group’s debt is arranged on an asset-specific, non-recourse basis (mortgage type loans in SPVs). This allows 
the Group a higher degree of flexibility in dealing with potential covenant defaults than if the debt was arranged under a Group-
wide borrowing facility. Portfolio loans secured by multiple properties are also used when circumstances require it or to obtain 
better conditions.

Banking covenants vary according to each loan agreement, but typically include loan-to-value and income related covenants. 
In addition, the Group has two “green” loans, each of which have a 10-basis point incentive for achieving certain sustainability 
targets. The Group targets a loan-to-value in the range of 35% to 45%. Balance sheet loan-to-value at 31 December 2023 was 
48.5% (2022: 42.2%). 

Loan covenant compliance is closely monitored by the treasury department. Potential covenant breaches can ordinarily be 
avoided by placing additional security or a cash deposit with the lender, or by partial repayment to cure an event of default.

The Group’s loan facilities and other borrowings are spread across a range of 24 banks and financial institutions so as to 
minimise any potential concentration of risk.

145

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION22. Financial assets and liabilities

Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Derivative financial assets
Other assets – current1

Financial liabilities:
Secured bank loans
Other liabilities – current2

At 31 December 2023

Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Derivative financial assets
Other assets – current1

Financial liabilities:
Secured bank loans
Other liabilities – current2

At 31 December 2022

Fair value 
through profit 
and loss  
£m

Amortised  
cost  
£m

Total
carrying
value  
£m

–
4.3
–

4.3

–
–

–

70.6
–
15.3

85.9

70.6
4.3
15.3

90.2

(1,070.6)
(45.9)

(1,070.6)
(45.9)

(1,116.5)

(1,116.5)

4.3

(1,030.6)

(1,026.3)

Fair value 
through profit 
and loss  
£m

Amortised  
cost  
£m

Total
carrying
value  
£m

–
8.5
–

8.5

–
–

–

113.9
–
13.0

126.9

113.9
8.5
13.0

135.4

(1,105.9)
(43.3)

(1,105.9)
(43.3)

(1,149.2)

(1,149.2)

8.5

(1,022.3)

(1,013.8)

1   Other assets included all amounts shown as trade and other receivables in note 15 except prepayments of £1.4 million (2022: £2.7 million). All current amounts are 

non-interest bearing and receivable within one year.

2   Other liabilities included all amounts shown as trade and other payables in note 17 except deferred income and sales and social security taxes of £22.7 million 

(2022: £15.1 million). All amounts are non-interest bearing and are due within one year.

Reconciliation of net financial assets and liabilities to borrowings and derivative financial instruments

2023
£m

1,026.3
15.3
(45.9)
70.6

2022
£m

1,013.8
13.0
(43.3)
113.9

1,066.3

1,097.4

Number of shares authorised, issued and fully paid

Ordinary  
shares in 
circulation

Treasury  
shares

Total  
ordinary  
shares

Ordinary 
shares in 
circulation  
£m

Treasury 
shares  
£m

Total  
ordinary 
shares  
£m

397,210,866
199,402

41,566,914
(199,402)

438,777,780
–

397,410,268

41,367,512

438,777,780

9.9
–

9.9

1.1
–

1.1

11.0
–

11.0

Net financial assets and liabilities:
Other assets – current
Other liabilities – current
Cash and cash equivalents

Borrowings and derivative financial instruments

23. Share capital

At 1 January 2023
Issue of shares

At 31 December 2023

146

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued23. Share capital continued

At 1 January 2022
Purchase of own shares (market purchase)

At 31 December 2022

Number of shares authorised, issued and fully paid

Ordinary  
shares in 
circulation

Treasury  
shares

Total  
ordinary  
shares

Ordinary 
shares in 
circulation  
£m

Treasury 
shares  
£m

Total  
ordinary 
shares  
£m

407,395,760
(10,184,894)

31,382,020
10,184,894

438,777,780
–

397,210,866

41,566,914

438,777,780

10.2
(0.3)

9.9

0.8
0.3

1.1

11.0
–

11.0

The Board is authorised, by shareholder resolution, to allot shares or grant such subscription rights (as are contemplated by 
sections 551(1) (a) and (b) respectively of the Companies Act 2006) up to a maximum aggregate nominal value of £3,311,752 
representing one-third of the issued share capital of the Company excluding treasury shares.

24. Earnings per share
The calculation of earnings per ordinary share is based on earnings after tax and the weighted average number of ordinary shares 
in issue during the year.

Weighted average number of ordinary shares in circulation

Number of ordinary shares in circulation

2023  
Number

2022  
Number

397,330,507

404,410,051

397,410,268

397,210,866

For diluted earnings per share, the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issues is adjusted to assume conversion of 
all dilutive potential ordinary shares. The diluted earnings per share does not assume conversion of potential ordinary shares 
that would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share. The diluted loss per share for the period to 31 December 2023 
was restricted to a loss of £62.9p per share, as the loss per share cannot be reduced by dilution in accordance with IAS 33, 
Earnings Per Share.

The Group has three types of dilutive potential ordinary shares, being: unvested shares granted under the Long Term Incentive 
Plan for executive directors and senior management; unvested shares granted under the Element B plan for executive directors 
and senior management; and unvested shares granted under the Special Share Award plan to key management. The issue of all 
these unvested shares in contingent upon satisfying specified conditions such as length of service and company performance. 

Employee share plan

Element B/Special Award
LTIP

Total potential dilutive shares

25. Dividend

Current year
2023 final dividend1
2023 interim dividend

Distribution of current year profit

Prior year
2022 final dividend
2022 interim dividend

Distribution of prior year profit

2021 final dividend

Payment
date

2 May 2024
3 October 2023

2 May 2023
3 October 2022

29 April 2022

Dividends as reported in the Group statement of changes in equity

1   Subject to shareholder approval at the AGM on 25 April 2024. Total cost of proposed dividend is £21.3m. 

2023  
Number

2022  
Number

820,246
2,880,054

520,901
1,674,113

3,700,300

2,195,014

Dividend
per share 
p

2023  
£m

2022  
£m

5.35
2.60

7.95

5.35
2.60

7.95

5.35

–
10.3

10.3

21.3
–

21.3

–

31.6

–
–

–

–
10.6

10.6

21.8

32.4

147

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION26. Other reserves

At 1 January 2023
Exchange rate variances 
Property, plant and equipment:

– net fair value gains in the year
– deferred tax thereon
– reserve transfer on disposal of PPE

Share-based payment credit

At 31 December 2023

Capital 
redemption 
reserve  
£m

Cumulative 
translation 
reserve  
£m

Fair value 
reserve  
£m

Share-based 
payment 
reserve 
£m

Notes

13
18

22.7
–

59.7
(12.3)

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–

22.7

47.4

3.0
–

2.2
(0.6)
1.5
–

6.1

1.9
–

–
–
–
0.5

2.4

Capital 
redemption 
reserve  
£m

Cumulative 
translation 
reserve  
£m

Fair value 
reserve  
£m

Share-based 
payment 
reserve 
£m

Notes

At 1 January 2022
Exchange rate variances 
Property, plant and equipment:

– net fair value gains in the year
– deferred tax thereon
– reclassification of student accommodation

13
18

Share-based payment credit

At 31 December 2022 

22.7
–

31.2
28.5

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–

22.7

59.7

5.0
–

1.9
(0.4)
(3.5)
–

3.0

1.7
–

–
–
–
0.2

1.9

Other  
reserves  
£m

28.1
–

–
–
–
–

Total  
£m

115.4
(12.3)

2.2
(0.6)
1.5
0.5

28.1

106.7

Other  
reserves  
£m

28.1
–

–
–
–
–

Total  
£m

88.7
28.5

1.9
(0.4)
(3.5)
0.2

28.1

115.4

The capital redemption reserve comprises of the nominal value of the Company’s own shares acquired as a result of share 
buyback programmes.

The cumulative translation reserve comprises the aggregate effect of translating net assets of overseas subsidiaries into Sterling 
since acquisition.

The fair value reserve comprises the aggregate movement in the value of financial assets classified as fair value through 
comprehensive income, owner-occupied property and hotel since acquisition, net of deferred tax.

The amount classified as other reserves was created prior to listing in 1994 on a Group reconstruction and is considered 
to be non-distributable.

Share options exercised in each respective year have been settled using the treasury shares of the Group. The reduction in the 
treasury share equity component is equal to the cost incurred to acquire the shares, on a weighted average basis. Any excess of 
the cash received from employees over the reduction in treasury shares is recorded in share premium. In 2023 there were 199,402 
treasury shares transferred to the EBT (2022: 10,184,894) to satisfy future awards under employee share plans. At 31 December 
2023, the Group held 41,367,512 ordinary shares (2022: 41,566,914) with a market value of £1.1 million (2022: £1.1 million) in 
treasury. The Company’s voting rights and dividends in respect of the treasury shares, including those own shares which the EBT 
holds, continue to be waived.

27. Notes to the cash flow

Cash generated from operations

Operating loss
Adjustments for:

Net movements on revaluation of investment properties
Net movements on revaluation of equity investments
Depreciation and amortisation
Profit on sale of investment property
Lease incentive debtor adjustments
Share-based payment charge

Changes in working capital:

(Increase)/decrease in receivables
Increase/(decrease) in payables

Cash generated from operations

148

2023  
£m

(223.4)

302.7
1.3
0.8
(1.4)
(1.1)
0.5

(0.9)
4.7

83.2

2022  
£m

(63.9)

136.5
3.8
0.6
(0.5)
(7.8)
0.2

2.3
(0.7)

70.5

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued27. Notes to the cash flow continued

Non-cash movements
2023

Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities

Notes

1 January 
2023  
£m

Financing 
cash flows  
£m

Amortisation 
of loan  
issue costs 
£m

Fair value 
adjustments 
£m

New leases
£m

Foreign 
exchange 
£m

31 December 
2023  
£m

Borrowings
Interest rate swaps
Interest rate caps
Lease liabilities

19
20
20

1,105.9
(5.6)
 (2.9)
3.6

1,101.0

(24.6)
–
–
–

(24.6)

1.6
–
–
–

1.6

–
3.1
1.1
–

4.2

–
–
–
–

–

(12.3)
–
–
(0.1)

1,070.6
(2.5)
 (1.8)
3.5

 (12.4)

1,069.8

Non-cash movements
2022

Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities

Notes

1 January 
2022  
£m

Financing 
cash flows  
£m

Amortisation 
of loan  
issue costs 
£m

Fair value 
adjustments 
£m

New leases
£m

Foreign 
exchange 
£m

31 December 
2022  
£m

Borrowings
Interest rate swaps
Interest rate caps
Lease liabilities

19
20
20

1,031.6
0.4
–
3.4

1,035.4

43.6
–
–
–

43.6

1.8
–
–
–

1.8

–
(6.0)
(2.8)
–

(8.8)

–
–
–
–

–

28.9
–
(0.1)
0.2

29.0

1,105.9
(5.6)
(2.9)
3.6

1,101.0

28. Contingencies
In April 2023, CLS Holdings plc dissolved 8 subsidiaries (the ‘Companies’).  Before the Companies were dissolved, capital reductions 
and distributions of the net assets of the subsidiaries, primarily represented by inter-company receivables of £17.1m, to the Parent 
should have been executed. However, they were not.  As a consequence of this, as a matter of Law, on dissolution of these 
Companies the technical titles to the inter-company receivables were transferred from the Group to the Crown. The Directors have 
taken legal advice and started the process to restore these Companies. Thereafter, the Directors can execute the capital reductions 
and make appropriate distributions to the Parent of these Companies assets. Also, based on that legal advice, the Directors 
consider that it is improbable that the Crown will pursue the CLS group for these assets of the Companies prior to the process of 
the restoration of the Companies being completed and the technical title to the receivables being returned to the Group. Therefore, 
the Directors consider that it is not probable that an outflow of cash or other economic resources of £17.1m from the Group will 
occur, and therefore no provision is recognised at year end, but has been disclosed as a contingent liability.

29. Commitments
At the balance sheet date the Group had contracted with customers under non-cancellable operating leases for the following 
minimum lease payments:

Operating lease commitments – where the Group is lessor

Within one year
Between one and two years
Between two and three years
Between three and four years
Between four and five years
More than five years

2023  
£m

2022  
£m

100.9
84.0
61.0
48.6
36.7
153.2

484.4

100.4
85.7
71.4
50.3
38.8
135.0

481.6

Operating leases where the Group is the lessor are typically negotiated on a customer-by-customer basis and include break 
clauses and indexation provisions.

Other commitments
At 31 December 2023 the Group had contracted capital expenditure of £6.9 million (2022: £16.7 million). At the balance sheet date, 
the Group had not exchanged contracts to acquire any investment properties (2022: £nil). There were no authorised financial 
commitments which were yet to be contracted with third parties (2022: £nil).

149

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION30. Post-balance sheet events
In January 2024, CLS secured a £10 million unsecured overdraft facility with RBS.

Subsequent to the year end the previously exchanged sale of Westminister Tower failed to complete. The sale was not recognised 
in 2023 and the property is now being re-marketed for sale.

31. Subsidiaries
The Group financial statements include the financial statements of CLS Holdings plc and all of its subsidiaries, which are listed 
below. All are 100% owned unless otherwise stated. Those marked with a * were dissolved during 2023, those marked with a ^ 
were sold during 2023.

United Kingdom
Registered Office: 16 Tinworth Street, London SE11 5AL

16 Tinworth Street (Residential) 
Limited
401 King Street Limited
Apex Tower Limited
Base Offices Limited
Brent House Limited
Cassini Pascal Limited
Centenary Court Limited
Central London Securities Limited
CI Tower Investments Limited
Citadel Finance Limited
Citadel Holdings plc
CLS Aberdeen Limited
CLS Capital Partners Limited
CLS Chancery House Limited
CLS Church Road Limited 
CLS Cliffords Inn Limited
CLS Clockwork Limited
CLS Crawley Limited
CLS England and Wales Limited *
CLS Gateway House Limited
CLS Germany Limited
CLS Gresham Limited
CLS Harrow Limited

CLS Holdings UK Limited
CLS Kings Court Limited
CLS Lloyds Avenue Limited
CLS London Limited
CLS London Properties Limited
CLS Northern Properties Limited *
CLS One Limited
CLS Pacific House Limited
CLS Prescot Limited
CLS Priory Place Limited
CLS Residential Investments Limited
CLS Scotland Limited *
CLS South London Limited
CLS Spring Gardens Limited
CLS Staines Limited
CLS UK Properties plc
CLS UK Property Finance Limited
CLS UK Property Finance 2 Limited
CLS UK Property Finance 3 Limited
CLS Watford Limited
CLSH Management Limited
Columbia Bracknell Limited 
Coventry House Limited
Dukes Road Limited

Elmfield Road Limited
Fetter Lane Apartments Limited
Fetter Lane Leasehold Limited
Harman House Limited 
Hygeia Harrow Limited
Ingrove Limited
Instant Office Limited
Kennington Road Limited
Ladywell House Limited*
Larkhall Lane Limited
Maidenhead Cloud Gate Limited
Mirenwest Limited
New Printing House Square 
Limited
NYK Investments Limited
One Elmfield Park Limited
Prescot Street Leasco Limited *
Quayside Lodge Limited *
Rayman Finance Limited
Reflex Bracknell Limited
Sentinel House Limited
Shard of Glass Limited *
Sidlaw House Limited *
Southern House Limited

Spring Gardens III Limited
Spring Mews (Block D) Limited
Spring Mews (Hotel) Limited
Spring Mews (Student) Limited
Spring Mews Limited
Three Albert Embankment 
Limited
Vauxhall Square Limited
Vauxhall Square One Limited
Vauxhall Square (Student) Limited
Wandsworth Road Limited

150

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continued31. Subsidiaries continued
Jersey
Registered Office: 1st Floor Liberation House, Castle Street, St Helier, Jersy JE1 1GL

CLS Holdings plc Employee Benefit Trust

France
Registered Office: 36 Rue Jules Verne, 92300 Levallois-Perret, Paris

120 Jean Jaures Sàrl
Avenue du Park SCI 
BV France Sàrl
Capitaine Guynemer Sàrl 
CLS France Sàrl 
CLS Management Sàrl
Debussy SCI
De Musset Sàrl
Foch SCI*

Forum France SCI 
Georges Clemençeau Sàrl 
Immobilière 6 Sàrl
Immobilière 8 Sàrl
Immobilière 10 Sàrl
Immobilière V SA
Jean Walters Sàrl
Le D’Aubigny SCI
Le Quatuor SCI 

Le Sigma Sàrl
Leclerc SCI
Mission Marchand Sàrl 
Parc SCI
Petits Hotels Sàrl
Rhone Alpes Sàrl 
Rue Stephenson Sàrl* 
Scala Sàrl
SCI Frères Peugeot

Germany
Registered Office: Nagelsweg 37, 20097 Hamburg

CLS Germany GmbH
CLS Green Energy GmbH
Jarrestrasse Immobilien GmbH

Luxembourg
Registered Office: 33 Avenue de la Liberte, 1931 Luxembourg

235 Lyon Sarl 
Aldershofer Sarl 
Albertina Sarl 
Cavernet Sarl 
Chronotron Sarl 
CLS Dortmund Hiltropwall Sarl
CLS Hansaalee Sarl 
CLS Immobilien Stuttgart Sarl 
CLS Investments Sarl 

CLS Investments 2 Sarl 
CLS Luxembourg Sarl 
CLS Metropoolis Sarl 
CLS Palisade Sarl 
CLS Storkower Strasse Sarl 
CLS Tangentis Sarl 
CLS Wendenstrasse Sarl 
Freepost Sarl 
Garivet Sarl 

Gotic Haus Sarl  
Grossglockner Sarl 
Hermalux Sarl 
Kapellen Sarl 
Landstrasse Sarl 
Naropere Sarl 
Network Perlach Sarl 
Prater Sarl 
Salisbury Hill Sarl 

Netherlands
Registered Office: Burgemeester van Reenensingel 101, 2803 DA Gouda

CLS Management BV 
Portapert Properties III BV*
Portapert Properties UK BV

Sweden
Registered Office: Skönabäck 122, 274 91 Skurup

Cood Investments AB (58.02%)*
Museion Förvaltning AB 
Rasstaf Sweden AB

Xtraworks AB^

SCI Pierre Valette
Sego Sàrl
Solferino SCI

Satimood Sarl 
Schonbrunn Sarl 
Zillertal Sarl 

151

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION32. Related party transactions 
Transactions with Directors
Distributions totalling £2,161,582 (2022: £2,160,231) were made through dividend payments in the year in respect of ordinary 
shares held by the Directors and £16,653,658 (2022: £16,530,803) to the majority shareholder.

During the year the following transactions occurred with companies associated to the majority shareholder:

•  The Group charged a management fee in relation to providing property management and administration services. A Group 

company, CLSH Management Limited, invoiced fees totalling £nil (2022: £81). At the balance sheet date £nil was outstanding 
(2022: £nil). 

•  The Group recharged salary costs in relation to providing administration services. CLS Holdings plc invoiced costs totalling 

£60,450 (2022: £63,384). At the balance sheet date £60,450 was outstanding (2022: £63,384).

•  The Group paid fees in relation to the provision of company administration and bookkeeping services in Sweden totalling 

£nil (2022: £23,601). At the balance sheet date £nil was outstanding (2022: £3,570). 

•  A Group company, CLS Holdings plc executed an unsecured a £20 million revolving credit facility with Creative Value Investment 
Group Limited, the investment vehicle of The Sten and Karin Mortstedt Family and Charity Trust, for a period of 2 years with an 
option to extend a further year. As at balance sheet date the amount drawn on this facility was £nil (2022: £nil).

During the year, or previous year, the following transactions associated with the Directors occurred:

•  During the year, the Group invoiced rental related charges of £179,790 (2022: £169,944) to IKEA Limited, a company in a group 

of companies with a common Director. At the balance sheet date £5,946 was outstanding (2022: £nil).

Directors’ remuneration
The remuneration of the Directors, who are the key management personnel of the Group, is set out below in aggregate for 
each of the categories specified in IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures.

Short-term employee benefits
Post-employment benefits
Other long-term benefits

2023 
£000

1,428
49
7

1,484

2022 
£000

960
4
56

1,020

152

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes to the Group financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 continuedCompany balance sheet at 31 December 2023

Non-current assets

Investment in subsidiary undertakings
Intangible assets

Current assets

Trade and other receivables

Total assets

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables

Total liabilities

Net assets

Equity

Share capital
Share premium
Other reserves
Retained earnings

Shareholders’ funds

Restated 
2022  
£m 
Note 4

440.4
2.8

3.6

446.8

(59.5)

(59.5)

387.3

11.0
83.1
28.3
264.9

387.3

2023 
£m

534.5
2.9

77.5

614.9

(241.3)

(241.3)

373.6

11.0
83.1
28.8
250.7

373.6

Notes

8

9

10

11
12
12
12

13

The Company reported a profit for the financial year ended 31 December 2023 of £17.4 million (2022: restated £32.8 million).

The notes on pages 155 to 159 are an integral part of these Company financial statements.

These financial statements of CLS Holdings plc (registered number: 02714781) were approved by the Board of Directors 
and authorised for issue on 8 March 2024 and were signed on its behalf by:

Mr F Widlund 
Chief Executive Officer 

Mr A Kirkman
Chief Financial Officer

153

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
 
 
 
Company statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 2023

Arising in 2023:

Profit for the year
Share-based payment charge 
Dividends to shareholders

Total changes arising in 2023
At 1 January 2023

At 31 December 2023

Arising in 2022:

Profit for the year - restated (note 4)
Share-based payment charge 
Dividends to shareholders
Purchase of own shares

Total changes arising in 2022
At 1 January 2022

At 31 December 2022

Notes

6
12
7

Notes

12
12
7
12

Share  
capital  
£m 

Share  
premium  
£m 

Other  
reserves  
£m 

Retained 
earnings  
£m

–
–
–

–
11.0

11.0

–
–
–

–
83.1

83.1

–
0.5
–

0.5
28.3

28.8

17.4
–
(31.6)

(14.2)
264.9

250.7

Share  
capital  
£m 

Share  
premium  
£m 

Other  
reserves  
£m 

Retained 
earnings 
£m

–
–
–
–

–
11.0

11.0

–
–
–
–

–
83.1

83.1

–
0.2
–
–

0.2
28.1

28.3

32.8
–
(32.4)
(25.8)

(25.4)
290.3

264.9

Total  
£m

17.4
0.5
(31.6)

(13.7)
387.3

373.6

Total  
£m

32.8
0.2
(32.4)
(25.8)

(25.2)
412.5

387.3

The notes on pages 155 to 159 are an integral part of these Company financial statements.

154

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
Notes to the Company financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023

1. General information
These separate Company financial statements are presented as required by the Companies Act 2006 and prepared on the 
historical cost basis. The Company has applied UK GAAP Financial Reporting Standard 101 ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’ (‘FRS 
101’).CLS Holdings plc is the ultimate Parent Company of the CLS Holdings Group registered and incorporated in the United 
Kingdom under Companies Act 2006. Its primary activity (which occurs exclusively within the United Kingdom) is to hold shares in 
subsidiary companies.

2. Basis of accounting
As permitted by FRS 101, the Company has taken advantage of all the disclosure exemptions including the following:

•  IAS 1 – exemption from capital management disclosures requirements
•  IAS 7 – cash flow statement 
•  IAS 8 – IFRSs issued but not yet effective
•  IAS 24 – related party disclosures
•  IFRS 2 – share based payments
•  IFRS 7 – financial instruments
•  IFRS 13 – fair value measurement

Where required, equivalent disclosures are given in the Group financial statements.

Going concern
The Group and Company’s going concern assessment covers the period to 31 July 2025. The going concern assessment uses the 
business plan approved by the Board at its November 2023 meeting as the Base case (see note 2.1 of the Group financial 
statements). Whilst the Directors consider that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s 
ability to continue as a going concern (see note 2 to the Consolidated financial statements for more details) the financial statements 
are prepared on a going concern basis. The financial statements do not contain the adjustments that would result if the Company 
was unable to continue as a going concern.

3. Material accounting policies
The principal accounting policies are summarised below.

3.1 Investments in subsidiaries
Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost less provisions for impairment. Dividend income is recognised 
when received.

3.2 Impairment
Investments are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not 
be recoverable. Recoverability of investments are measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the investment and fair 
value less costs to sell. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognised is the amount by which the 
carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the investments.

3.3 Pension costs
The Company operates a defined contribution pension scheme for all eligible employees. The pension costs charged represent the 
contributions payable. Differences between contributions payable in the year and contributions paid are shown as either accruals 
or prepayments in the balance sheet.

3.4 Share capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in 
equity as a deduction from proceeds, net of tax. Where a Group company purchases the Company’s equity share capital, the 
consideration paid, including any directly attributable incremental costs (net of income taxes), is deducted from equity attributable 
to the owners of the Company until the shares are cancelled, reissued or disposed of. Where such shares are subsequently sold or 
reissued, any consideration received, net of any directly attributable incremental transaction costs and the related income tax 
effects, is included in equity attributable to the owners of the Company.

3.5 Foreign currencies
The financial statements are presented in Sterling, which is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the 
Company operates, known as its functional currency. Transactions in currencies other than the Company’s functional currency 
are recognised at the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At each balance sheet date, monetary assets 
and liabilities that are denominated in other currencies are translated into Sterling at the rates prevailing at that date.

155

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONNotes to the Company financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 

continued

4. Restatement of prior period
During the preparation of this year’s financial statements, the directors noted that the comparative information of CLS Holdings plc 
at 31 December 2022 required adjustments that change the previously reported net assets and the profit for that year. During the 
year ended 31 December 2022 two subsidiaries were acquired by CLS Holdings plc from another group company for £26.4m, 
however this transaction was not recorded by CLS Holdings plc. Therefore, an investment in subsidiaries of £26.4m should have 
been initially recognised matched with an increase in liabilities to group companies of £26.4m relating to a loan issued to facilitate 
the transaction. Subsequently, however, the reported net assets of one of the purchased subsidiaries as at 31 December 2022 had 
fallen and the investment in the subsidiary should have been impaired by £8.5m.

As a consequence, the comparatives at 31 December 2022 have been adjusted as follows:

•  Investment in subsidiaries has increased by £17.9m from £422.5m to £440.4m, after taking into account the impairment loss 

of £8.5m

•  Loans due to group companies have increased by £26.4m from £30.9m to £57.3m
•  The reported profit for the year 31 December 2022 and net assets and distributable reserves at 31 December 2022 have 

reduced by £8.5m as:

 –  profit for the year decreasing from £41.3m to £32.8m;
 –  net assets decreasing from £395.8m to £387.3m; and
 –  distributable reserves decreasing from £273.4m to £264.9m

There is no impact on the opening balances as at 1 January 2022. There is no impact on the consolidated financial statements.

5. Accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty 
Accounting judgements
In accordance with IAS 1, the Directors have considered the judgements that have been made in the process of applying 
the Company’s accounting policies, which are described in note 3, and which of those judgements have the most significant effect 
on the amounts recognised in the financial statements. 

Going Concern

For the purposes of the going concern assessment, the Group and Company makes judgements in determining future cash flows 
which are based on assumptions. The most significant judgements relate to the terms and ability to refinance loan facilities and 
recycle capital. These judgements are made by management based on recent performance, external factors and management’s 
knowledge and expertise of cashflow drivers. See note 2 to the Consolidated financial statements for more details.

In the opinion of the Directors, they consider the following to be ongoing judgements. 

•  Impairments to investment in subsidiaries - the recoverable amount is considered to be best estimated by the net asset value at 

the subsidiaries.

Key sources of estimation uncertainty
The key sources of estimation uncertainty in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements is the net asset value at the 
subsidiaries that is primarily determined by the property values therein (see note 3 in the consolidated financial statements).

6. Profit for financial year
As permitted by s408 Companies Act 2006, the Company’s profit and loss account has not been presented in these financial 
statements. The Company’s profit for the financial year was £17.4 million (2022: restated £32.8 million).

Audit fees for the Company were £0.1 million (2022: £0.1 million).

Details of the Directors employed during the year and of their remuneration is included in the Remuneration Committee Report on 
pages 81 to 99.

156

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTS7. Dividend

Current year
2023 final dividend1
2023 interim dividend

Distribution of current year profit

Prior year
2022 final dividend
2022 interim dividend

Distribution of prior year profit

2021 final dividend

Payment
date

Dividend
per share 
p

2023  
£m

2022  
£m

2 May 2024
3 October 2023

2 May 2023
3 October 2022

29 April 2022

5.35
2.60

7.95

5.35
2.60

7.95

5.35

–
10.3

10.3

21.3
–

21.3

–

31.6

–
–

–

–
10.6

10.6

21.8

32.4

2023 
£m

440.4
208.3
(62.1)
(52.1)

534.5

Restated 
2022 
£m1

451.4
26.4
(23.9)
(13.5)

440.4

Dividends as reported in the Group statement of changes in equity

1  Subject to shareholder approval at the AGM on 25 April 2024. Total cost of proposed dividend is £21.3 million.

8. Investment in subsidiary undertakings

At 1 January
Additions
Disposals
Provision for impairment

At 31 December

1  The prior year additions and provision for impairment have been restated as described in note 4 along with their respective totals.

Certain indicators of impairment were identified by the Company as at 31 December 2023. A determination of the recoverable 
amount of the investments in subsidiaries were made using the net asset value at the subsidiaries, resulting in an impairment of 
£52.1 million (2022: £13.5 million). The recoverable amount remains sensitive to the financial performance and financial position of 
both the Company and its subsidiaries, including the valuation of investment properties of its subsidiaries (see note 12 of Group 
financial statements). 

During the year, the Group performed a recapitalisation of a number of existing subsidiaries, which results in additions of 
£163.1 million in the year. Included in additions and disposals is £45.2 million of subsidiaries transferred to a new 100% owned 
holding company.

157

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONNotes to the Company financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 

continued

9. Trade and other receivables

Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings 
Other receivables
Prepayments and accrued income
Social security and other taxes

10. Trade and other payables

Trade payables
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings 
Accruals

2023 
£m

74.8
2.3
0.2
0.2

77.5

2023 
£m

0.1
239.0
2.2

241.3

1  The prior year amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings have been restated as described in note 4 along with their respective totals.

11. Share capital

At 1 January 2023
Issue of shares

At 31 December 2023

At 1 January 2022
Purchase of own shares (market purchase)

At 31 December 2022

Number of shares authorised, issued and fully paid

Ordinary 
shares in 
circulation

Treasury 
shares

Total 
ordinary 
shares

Ordinary 
shares in 
circulation 
£m

Treasury 
shares 
£m

397,210,866
199,402

41,566,914
(199,402)

438,777,780
–

397,410,268

41,367,512

438,777,780

9.9
–

9.9

1.1
–

1.1

Number of shares authorised, issued and fully paid

Ordinary 
shares in 
circulation

Treasury 
shares

Total 
ordinary 
shares

Ordinary 
shares in 
circulation 
£m

Treasury 
shares 
£m

407,395,760
(10,184,894)

31,382,020
10,184,894

438,777,780
–

397,210,866

41,566,914

438,777,780

10.2
(0.3)

9.9

0.8
0.3

1.1

2022 
£m

2.2
1.1
0.2
0.1

3.6

Restated 
2022 
£m1

–
57.3
2.2

59.5

Total 
ordinary 
shares 
£m

11.0
–

11.0

Total 
ordinary 
shares 
£m

11.0
–

11.0

The Board is authorised, by shareholder resolution, to allot shares or grant such subscription rights (as are contemplated by 
sections 551(1) (a) and (b) respectively of the Companies Act 2006) up to a maximum aggregate nominal value of £3,311,752 
representing one-third of the issued share capital of the Company excluding treasury shares.

12. Reserves

At 1 January 2023
Share-based payment charge
Profit for the year
Dividends to shareholders

At 31 December 2023

158

Other reserves

Share 
premium
£m

Capital 
redemption 
reserve 
£m

Share-based 
payment 
reserve
£m

83.1
–
–
–

83.1

22.7
–
–
–

22.7

1.0
0.5
–
–

1.5

Other 
£m

4.6
–
–
–

4.6

Total 
£m

28.3
0.5
–
–

28.8

Retained 
earnings
£m

264.9
–
17.4
(31.6)

250.7

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023FINANCIAL STATEMENTS12. Reserves – continued

At 1 January 2022
Share-based payment charge
Profit for the year - restated (note 4)
Dividends to shareholders
Purchase of own shares

At 31 December 2022

Other reserves

Share 
premium
£m

Capital 
redemption 
reserve 
£m

Share-based 
payment 
reserve
£m

83.1
–
–
–
–

83.1

22.7
–
–
–
–

22.7

0.8
0.2
–
–
–

1.0

Other 
£m

4.6
–
–
–
–

4.6

13. Reconciliation of movements in shareholders’ funds

At 1 January
Profit for the year - restated (note 4)
Dividends to shareholders
Purchase of own shares
Share-based payment charge

At 31 December

14. Contingencies
Guarantees

Total 
£m

28.1
0.2
–
–
–

28.3

2023 
£m

387.3
17.4
(31.6)
–
0.5

373.6

Restated 
retained 
earnings £m 

290.3
–
32.8
(32.4)
(25.8)

264.9

Restated 
2022 
£m

412.5
32.8
(32.4)
(25.8)
0.2

387.3

At 31 December 2023 and 31 December 2022 CLS Holdings plc had guaranteed certain liabilities of Group companies. These were 
primarily in relation to Group borrowings and covered interest and amortisation payments. Principal amounts of loans secured 
from external lenders by two Group companies totalling £39.5 million at 31 December 2023 are also covered by guarantees 
provided by CLS Holdings plc (£29.9 million at 31 December 2022). CLS Holdings plc guarantees a £30 million revolving credit 
facility with RBS. As at 31 December 2023 the amount drawn on this facility was £nil (31 December 2022: £nil). Since the possibility 
of payment by the Company under any of these guarantees and warranties is considered remote, no provisions in relation to these 
have been made in the Company’s financial statements and no reportable contingent liability exists.

Other

In April 2023, CLS Holdings plc dissolved 8 subsidiaries (the ‘Companies’).  Before the Companies were dissolved, capital reductions 
and distributions of the net assets of the subsidiaries, primarily represented by inter-company receivables of £17.1 million, to CLS 
Holdings plc should have been executed. However, they were not.  As a consequence of this, as a matter of Law, on dissolution of 
these Companies the technical titles to the inter-company receivables were transferred from the Company to the Crown. 
The Directors have taken legal advice and started the process to restore these Companies. Thereafter, the Directors can then 
execute the capital reductions and make proper distributions to the Parent of these Companies assets.

Also, based on that legal advice, the Directors consider that it is improbable that the Crown will pursue CLS Holdings plc for 
settlement of the receivables prior to the process of the restoration of the Companies being completed and the receivables 
technical title being returned to the Company. Therefore, the Directors consider that it is not probable that an outflow of cash or 
other economic resources of £17.1 million will occur, and it is therefore no provision is made at year end, but has been disclosed as 
a contingent liability.

15. Commitments
At 31 December 2023, the Company had no contracted capital expenditure (2022: £nil) and no authorised financial commitments 
which were yet to be contracted with third parties (2022: £nil).

159

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONFive-year financial summary (unaudited)

2023  
£m

2022  
£m

2021  
£m

2020  
£m

2019  
£m

148.7

113.0
(18.2)
(15.6)

79.2
(302.7)
1.4
–
(1.3)

(223.4)

1.6
(41.6)
–

(263.4)
13.6

(249.8)

139.7

107.8
(15.7)
(16.2)

75.9
(136.5)
0.5
–
(3.8)

(63.9)

10.1
(27.1)
(1.1)

(82.0)
0.1

(81.9)

–

–

–

(249.8)

(81.9)

119.5

31.6

31.6

32.4

31.9

30.8

31.4

139.8

108.0
(16.2)
(14.4)

77.4
28.5
(0.1)
–
7.5

139.4

109.8
(18.5)
(15.1)

76.2
31.5
11.6
–
–

138.3

110.6
(19.9)
(13.7)

77.0
57.4
8.6
40.4
–

113.3

119.3

183.4

5.9
(27.7)
–

91.5
28.0

119.5

3.2
(26.0)
–

96.5
(19.1)

77.4

–

77.4

30.1

30.8

5.0
(29.4)
–

159.0
(23.8)

135.2

(0.5)

134.7

28.7

30.1

1,900.2
260.7

2,160.9
(262.8)
(968.9)

2,351.4
150.0

2,501.4
(234.0)
(1,046.6)

2,301.1
237.4

2,538.5
(229.8)
(978.0)

2,181.4
279.6

2,461.0
(158.2)
(1,032.2)

2,010.2
295.4

2,305.6
(198.9)
(904.3)

929.2

1,220.8

1,330.7

1,270.6

1,202.4

2023

233.8
253.0
(62.9)
10.3
(21.3)
(20.8)
108.2
48.5
2.23

2022

307.3
329.6
(20.2)
11.6
(3.5)
(3.7)
81.7
42.2
2.98

2021

326.6
350.5
29.3
11.3
7.1
3.7
65.4
37.1
3.16

2020

311.9
345.2
19.0
12.2
8.2
8.1
58.3
33.7
3.26

2019

295.1
326.3
33.3
12.0
10.7
9.4
53.0
31.4
3.42

Continuing operations

Revenue

Net rental income 
Administration expenses 
Other expenses

Operating profit before revaluation and disposals
Net revaluation movement on investment property
Profit/(loss) on sale of investment property
Gain on sale of other financial investments
Net revaluation movements on equity investments

Operating (loss)/profit

Finance income
Finance costs
Impairment of goodwill

(Loss)/profit before tax
Taxation

(Loss)/profit for the year from continuing operations
Discontinued operations

Loss for the year from discontinued operations

(Loss)/profit for the year

Dividends paid

Distribution of current year’s profit

Net assets employed
Non-current assets
Current assets

Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities

Net assets

Ratios

Net assets per share (pence)
EPRA NTA per share (pence)
Earnings per share (pence)
EPRA earnings per share (pence)
Total Accounting Return – basic (%)
Total Accounting Return – EPRA NTA (%)
Net gearing (%)
Balance sheet loan-to-value (%)
Interest cover (times)

160

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONSupplementary disclosures (unaudited)

Unaudited unless otherwise stated

Alternative Performance Measures
CLS uses all the EPRA metrics but we have also disclosed the measures that CLS used to prefer for certain of these categories. 
The notes below highlight where the measures that we monitor differ and our previous rationale for using them.

The measures we disclose are:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

EPRA net initial yield;
EPRA ‘topped-up’ net initial yield;
EPRA vacancy;
EPRA capital expenditure;
EPRA cost ratio;
EPRA LTV; and
EPRA like-for-like gross rental income growth.

Other APMs
CLS uses a number of other APMs, many of which are commonly used by industry peers;

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Total Accounting Return
Net borrowings and gearing;
Loan-to-value;
Administration cost ratio;
Dividend cover; and
Interest cover.

1. EPRA APMs
i) Yield
EPRA net initial yield (NIY)
EPRA NIY is calculated as the annualised rental income based on the cash rents passing at the balance sheet date less non-
recoverable property operating expenses, divided by the gross market value of the property (excluding those that are under 
development, student accommodation, held as PPE or occupied by CLS).

2023

2022

Rent passing
Adjusted for properties in development
Forecast non-recoverable service charge

Annualised net rents (A)

Property portfolio1
Adjusted for properties in development
Purchasers’ costs at 6.8%

Property portfolio valuation including 
purchasers’ costs (B)

United 
Kingdom 
£m

45.5
–
(3.7)

41.8

Germany  
£m

France  
£m

46.4
–
(2.0)

44.4

13.2
–
(0.5)

12.7

Total  
£m

105.1
–
(6.2)

98.9

United 
Kingdom 
£m

46.0
(0.9)
(1.5)

43.6

745.4
(15.7)
49.6

883.8
(2.9)
59.9

246.0
–
16.7

1,875.2
(18.5)
126.2

946.8
(118.7)
56.3

Germany 
£m

France
£m

Total
£m

101.4
(0.9)
(3.9)

96.7

12.8
–
(0.3)

12.5

284.2
–
19.3

2,221.1
(123.6)
142.6

42.6
–
(2.1)

40.5

990.1
(4.9)
67.0

779.3

940.8

262.7

1,982.9

884.4

1,052.2

303.5

2,240.1

EPRA NIY (A/B)

5.4%

4.7%

4.8%

5.0%

4.9%

3.9%

4.1%

4.3%

1  The above table comprise data of the investment properties and properties held for sale. They exclude owner-occupied, land, student accommodation and hotel.

161

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONSupplementary disclosures (unaudited) continued

Alternative Performance Measures continued
EPRA ‘topped-up’ NIY
EPRA ‘topped-up’ NIY is calculated by making an adjustment to EPRA NIY in respect of the expiration of rent-free periods 
(or other unexpired lease incentives such as discounted rent periods and step rents).

2023

2022

Contracted rent
Adjusted for properties in development
Forecast non-recoverable service charge

‘Topped-up’ annualised net rents (A)

Property portfolio1
Adjusted for properties in development
Purchasers’ costs (6.8%)

Property portfolio valuation including 
purchasers’ costs (B)

United 
Kingdom 
£m

50.9
–
(3.7)

47.2

Germany  
£m

France  
£m

47.5
–
(2.0)

45.5

14.2
–
(0.5)

13.7

Total  
£m

112.6
–
(6.2)

106.4

United 
Kingdom 
£m

48.1
(0.9)
(1.5)

45.7

745.4
(15.7)
49.6

883.8
(2.8)
59.9

246.0
–
16.7

1,875.2
(18.5)
126.2

946.8
(118.7)
56.3

Germany 
£m

France
£m

Total
£m

110.2
(0.9)
(3.9)

105.4

14.7
–
(0.3)

14.4

284.2
–
19.3

2,221.1
(123.6)
142.6

47.4
–
(2.1)

45.3

990.1
(4.9)
67.0

779.3

940.9

262.7

1,982.9

884.4

1,052.2

303.5

2,240.1

EPRA ‘topped-up’ NIY (A/B)

6.1%

4.8%

5.2%

5.4%

5.2%

4.3%

4.8%

4.7%

1  The above table comprise data of the investment properties and properties held for sale. They exclude owner-occupied, land, student accommodation and hotel.

ii) Vacancy
The EPRA vacancy rate calculates vacancy as a proportion of the ERV of the total portfolio and, from 2021, is the only measure 
used by the Group. 

EPRA vacancy

ERV of vacant space (A)
ERV of let space

ERV of total portfolio (B)

EPRA vacancy rate (A/B)

2023
£m

13.9
112.4

126.3

2022
£m

9.0
112.4

121.4

11.0%

7.4%

iii) Capital expenditure
EPRA capital expenditure 
This measure shows the total amounts spent on the Group’s investment properties on an accrual and cash basis with a split 
between expenditure used for the creation of incremental space and enhancing space (‘no incremental space’). The sum of these 
expenditures is included in Capital expenditure in Note 12 of the Notes to the Group Financial Statements. The Group is not party to 
any joint venture arrangements, therefore this measure is not disclosed. 

Acquisitions
Amounts spent on the completed investment property portfolio

Creation of incremental space
Creation of no incremental space

EPRA capital expenditure
Conversion from accrual to cash basis

EPRA capital expenditure on a cash basis

1  Group statement of cash flows.

162

Notes

12
12

CF1

2023
£m

–

2.1
47.5

49.6
(3.2)

46.4

2022
£m

83.4

12.7
45.5

141.6
(1.0)

140.6

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONiv) Cost ratios
EPRA cost ratio
The Group has a policy of capitalising certain staff costs directly attributable to the management of the development of investment 
properties as outlined in note 2.5 of the Notes to the Group Financial Statements.

Recurring administration expenses
Other expenses

Less: Other investments segment and student accommodation operating costs

Net service charge costs
Service charge costs recovered through rents but not separately invoiced
Dilapidations receipts

EPRA costs (including direct vacancy costs) (A)
Direct vacancy costs

EPRA costs (excluding direct vacancy costs) (B)

Gross rental income
Service charge components of gross rental income

EPRA gross rental income (C)

EPRA cost ratio (including direct vacancy costs) (A/C)

EPRA cost ratio (excluding direct vacancy costs) (B/C)

v) EPRA LTV

Borrowings from financial institutions
Net payables
Cash and cash equivalents

Net debt (A)

Properties held as property, plant and equipment
Investment properties
Properties held for sale
Financial assets – equity investments

Total property value (B)

EPRA LTV (A/B)

Notes

4

4

4

Notes

19

16

13
12
14

2023
£m

18.2
15.6
(5.2)

28.6
5.7
(0.1)
(2.3)

31.9
(6.1)

25.8

102.8
(0.1)

102.7

2022
£m

15.7
16.2
(5.7)

26.2
4.9
(0.3)
(1.2)

29.6
(4.0)

25.6

99.4
(0.3)

99.1

31.1%

29.9%

25.1%

25.8%

2023
£m

1,070.6
52.2
(70.6)

2022
£m

1,105.9
44.8
(113.9)

1,052.2

1,036.8

39.7
1,850.5
172.7
1.4

2,064.3

37.5
2,295.0
20.3
2.7

2,355.5

51.0%

44.0%

vi) EPRA like-for-like gross rental income growth
This measure shows the growth in gross rental income on properties owned throughout the current and previous year. This growth 
rate excludes properties held for development, acquired or disposed in either year.

Increase/(decrease) in gross rental income (%)

Increase/(decrease) in gross rental income (£m)

Notes

2023
%

3.5

2023
£m

3.4

2022
%

(1.8)

2022
£m

(1.8)

163

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONSupplementary disclosures (unaudited) continued

Alternative Performance Measures continued
2. Other APMs
i) Total Accounting Return per share

EPRA NTA at 31 December
Distribution – prior year final1
Distribution – current year interim
Less: EPRA NTA at 1 January (A)

Return before dividends (B)

Total Accounting Return (NTA) (B/A)

1  The 2023 and 2022 final dividend was 5.35p but has been rounded to 5.4p for the purpose of this note.

ii) Net borrowings and gearing

Borrowings short-term
Borrowings long-term

Add back: unamortised issue costs

Gross debt
Cash

Net borrowings (A)

Net assets (B)

Net gearing (A/B)

iii) Balance sheet loan-to-value

Borrowings short-term
Borrowings long-term

Less: cash

Net debt (A)

Investment properties
Properties in plant, property and equipment
Properties and land held for sale

Total property portfolio (B)

Balance sheet loan-to-value (A/B)

164

Notes

5
25
25
5

Notes

19
19
19

19
16

Notes

19
19
16

12
13
14

2023
pence

253.0
5.4
2.6
(329.6)

(68.6)

2022
pence

329.6
5.4
2.6
(350.5)

(12.9)

(20.8)%

(3.7)%

2023
£m

193.9
876.7
5.0

1,075.6
(70.6)

1,005.0

2022
£m

173.4
932.5
5.3

1,111.2
(113.9)

997.3

929.2

1,220.8

108.2%

81.7%

2023
£m

193.9
876.7
(70.6)

1,000.0

1,850.5
39.7
172.7

2,062.9

2022
£m

173.4
932.5
(113.9)

992.0

2,295.0
37.5
20.3

2,352.8

48.5%

42.2%

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONiv) CLS administration cost ratio
CLS’ administration cost ratio represents the cost of running the property portfolio relative to its net income. CLS uses this 
measure to monitor the efficiency of the business as it focuses on the administrative cost of active asset management across 
three countries. 

Recurring administration expenses
Less: Other investment segment

Underlying administration expenses (A)

Net rental income (B)

Administration cost ratio (A/B)

v) Dividend cover

Interim dividend
Final dividend

Total dividend (A)

EPRA earnings (B)

Dividend cover (B/A)

vi) Interest cover

Net rental income
Recurring administration expenses
Other expenses

Group revenue less costs (A)

Finance income (excluding derivatives and dividend income)
Finance costs (excluding derivatives)

Net interest (B)

Interest cover (-A/B)

2023
£m

18.2
(0.1)

18.1

2022
£m

15.7
(0.2)

15.5

113.0

107.8

16.0%

14.4%

Notes

4

4

Notes

25
25

2023
£m

10.3
21.3

31.6

5

40.9

1.30

2023
£m

113.0
(18.2)
(15.6)

79.2

1.6
(37.1)

(35.5)

Notes

4
4
4

8
9

2022
£m

10.6
21.3

31.9

47.0

1.47

2022
£m

107.8
(15.7)
(16.2)

75.9

1.3
(26.8)

(25.5)

2.23

2.98

165

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONGlossary

Administration cost ratio
Recurring administration expenses of the investment 
property operating segment expressed as a percentage 
of net rental income.

Balance sheet loan-to-value
Net debt expressed as a percentage of property assets.

Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment 
Method (BREEAM)
An environmental impact assessment method for non-domestic 
buildings. Their standards cover new construction, In-Use as 
well as refurbishment and fit-out. BREEAM In-Use enables 
property investors, owners, managers and occupiers to 
determine and drive sustainable improvements in the 
operational performance of their buildings. It provides 
sustainability benchmarking and assurance for all building 
types and assesses performance in a number of areas; 
management, health & wellbeing, energy, transport, 
water, resources, resilience, land use & ecology, and pollution. 
Performance is measured across a series of ratings; Good, 
Very Good, Excellent and Outstanding.

Carbon emissions Scopes 1, 2 and 3
Scope 1 – direct emissions;
Scope 2 – indirect emissions; and
Scope 3 – other indirect emissions.

CDP
CDP, formerly known as the Carbon Disclosure Project, 
assesses the ESG performance of all major companies 
worldwide and aids comparability between organisations to 
allow the investor community to assess the carbon and climate 
change risk of each company.

Contracted rent
Annual contracted rental income after any rent-free periods 
have expired.

Earnings per share
Profit for the year attributable to the owners of the Company 
divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in 
issue in the period.

Energy Performance Certificate (EPC)
An EPC is an asset rating detailing how energy efficient a 
building is, rated by carbon dioxide emission on a scale of A-G, 
where an A rating is the most energy efficient. They are legally 
required for any building that is to be put on the market for sale 
or rent.

European Public Real Estate Association (EPRA)
A not-for-profit association with a membership of Europe’s 
leading property companies, investors and consultants which 
strives to establish best practices in accounting, reporting and 
corporate governance and to provide high-quality information 
to investors. EPRA’s Best Practices Recommendations includes 
guidelines for the calculation of the following performance 
measures which the Group has adopted.

EPRA capital expenditure
Investment property acquisitions and expenditure split between 
amounts used for the creation of additional lettable area 
(‘incremental lettable space’) and enhancing existing space 
(‘no incremental space’) both on an accrual and cash basis.

166

EPRA cost ratio
Administrative & operating costs (including & excluding costs 
of direct vacancy) divided by gross rental income. A measure to 
enable meaningful measurement of the changes in a company’s 
operating costs.

EPRA earnings per share (EPS)
Earnings from operational activities. A measure of a company’s 
underlying operating results and an indication of the extent to 
which current dividend payments are supported by earnings.

EPRA like-for-like rental growth
This measure shows the growth in gross rental income on 
properties owned throughout the current and previous year 
under review. This growth rate excludes properties held for 
development, acquired or disposed in either year.

EPRA net reinstatement value (NRV) 
NAV adjusted to reflect the value required to rebuild the entity 
and assuming that entities never sell assets. Assets and 
liabilities, such as fair value movements on financial derivatives 
are not expected to crystallise in normal circumstances and 
deferred taxes on property valuation surpluses are excluded.

EPRA net tangible assets (NTA) 
Assumes that entities buy and sell assets, thereby crystallising 
certain levels of unavoidable deferred tax.

EPRA net disposal value (NDV) 
Represent the shareholders’ value under a disposal scenario, 
where deferred tax, financial instruments and certain other 
adjustments are calculated to the full extent of their liability, 
net of any resulting tax.

EPRA net initial yield (NIY)
Annualised rental income based on the cash rents passing at 
the balance sheet date, less non-recoverable property 
operating expenses, divided by the market value of the EPRA 
property portfolio, increased by estimated purchasers’ costs.

EPRA LTV
The aim of EPRA LTV is to assess the gearing of the 
shareholder equity within a real estate company by adjusting 
IFRS reporting. The main overarching concepts are: any capital 
which is not equity is considered as debt irrespective of its IFRS 
classification; it is calculated on proportional consolidation; and 
assets are included at fair value and net debt at nominal value.

EPRA ‘topped up’ net initial yield
This measure incorporates an adjustment to the EPRA NIY 
in respect of the expiration of rent-free periods (or other 
unexpired lease incentives such as discounted rent periods 
and stepped rents).

EPRA vacancy rate
Estimated rental value (ERV) of immediately available space 
divided by the ERV of the lettable portfolio.

Estimated rental value (ERV)
The market rental value of lettable space as estimated by the 
Group’s valuers.

GRESB
GRESB assesses and benchmarks the environmental, social 
and governance (ESG) performance of real assets, providing 
standardised and validated data to the capital markets.

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONInterest cover
The aggregate of group revenue less costs, divided by the 
aggregate of interest expense and amortisation of loan issue 
costs, less interest income.

Key performance indicators (KPIs)
Activities and behaviours, aligned to both business objectives 
and individual goals, against which the performance of the 
Group is annually assessed. Performance measured against 
them is referenced in the annual report.

Liquid resources
Cash and short-term deposits.

Net assets per share or net asset value (NAV)
Equity attributable to the owners of the Company divided by the 
diluted number of ordinary shares.

Net debt
Total borrowings less liquid resources.

Net gearing
Net debt expressed as a percentage of net assets attributable 
to the owners of the Company.

Net initial yield
Net rent on investment properties and properties held for sale 
expressed as a percentage of the valuation of those properties.

Net rent
Passing rent less net service charge costs.

Occupancy rate
Contracted rent expressed as a percentage of the aggregate 
of contracted rent and the ERV of vacant space.

Over-rented
The amount by which ERV falls short of the aggregate 
of contracted rent.

Passing rent
Contracted rent before any rent-free periods have expired.

Property loan-to-value
Property borrowings expressed as a percentage of the market 
value of the property portfolio.

Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT)
A Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) is a vehicle that allows an 
investor to obtain broadly similar returns from their investment, 
as they would have, had they invested directly in property. In the 
UK a REIT is exempt from UK tax on the income and gains of its 
property rental business. A REIT in the UK is required to invest 
mainly in property (75% of total Group’s assets and profits must 
be in the tax exempt business) and to pay out 90% of the profits 
from its property rental business as measured for tax purposes 
as dividends to shareholders (property income distributions). 
In the hands of the shareholder, property income distributions 
(PID) are taxable as profits of a UK property rental business. 
The PID is received net of withholding tax, unless it is to a 
recipient entitled to gross payment.

Rent reviews
Rent reviews take place at intervals agreed in the lease (typically 
every five years) and their purpose is usually to adjust the rent to 
the current market level at the review date. For upwards only 
rent reviews, the rent will either remain at the same level or 
increase (if market rents are higher) at the review date.

Rent roll
Contracted rent.

Return on equity
The aggregate of the change in equity attributable to the owners 
of the Company plus the amounts paid to the shareholders as 
dividends and the purchase of shares in the market, divided by 
the opening equity attributable to the owners of the Company.

Reversion
The amount by which ERV exceeds contracted rent.

Streamlined energy and carbon reporting (SECR)
The SECR regulations were introduced in April 2019 and require 
companies incorporated in the UK to undertake enhanced 
disclosures of their energy and carbon emissions in their 
financial reporting.

The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
Set up by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) in response to the 
G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors request for 
greater levels of decision-useful, climate-related information; 
the TCFD was asked to develop climate-related disclosures that 
could promote more informed investment, credit (or lending), 
and insurance underwriting decisions. In turn, this would enable 
stakeholders to understand better the concentrations of 
carbon-related assets in the financial sector and the financial 
system’s exposures to climate-related risks.

Total Accounting Return – basic
The change in IFRS net assets before the payment of dividends.

Total Accounting Return
The change in EPRA NTA before the payment of dividends.

Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
The growth in capital from purchasing a share, assuming that 
dividends are reinvested every time they are received.

True equivalent yield
The capitalisation rate applied to future cash flows to calculate 
the gross property value, as determined by the Group’s 
external valuers.

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by all 
United Nations Member States in 2015, provides a shared 
blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, 
now and into the future. At its heart are the 17 Sustainable 
Development Goals (SDGs), which are an urgent call for action 
by all countries – developed and developing – in a global 
partnership. They recognize that ending poverty and other 
deprivations must go hand-in-hand with strategies that improve 
health and education, reduce inequality, and spur economic 
growth – all while tackling climate change and working to 
preserve our oceans and forests.

167

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCEFINANCIAL STATEMENTSADDITIONAL INFORMATIONDirectors, officers and advisors

Directors
Lennart Sten*◊
Anna Seeley◊
Fredrik Widlund
Andrew Kirkman
Elizabeth Edwards‡†◊
Bill Holland*†
Eva Lindqvist* †
Bengt Mortstedt

(Non-Executive Chairman)
(Non-Executive Vice Chair)
(Chief Executive Officer)
(Chief Financial Officer)
(Non-Executive Director)
(Non-Executive Director)
(Non-Executive Director)
(Non-Executive Director)

‡  Senior Independent Director
*  Member of Remuneration Committee
†  Member of Audit Committee
◊  Member of Nomination Committee

Chief Operating Officer & Company Secretary
David Fuller BA, FCG

Registered Office
16 Tinworth Street, London, SE11 5AL

Registered Number
02714781

Website
www.clsholdings.com

Email
enquiries@clsholdings.com

Telephone
+44 (0)20 7582 7766

Registrars and Transfer Office
Computershare Investor Services Plc 
The Pavilions 
Bridgwater Road 
Bristol BS99 6ZZ

Shareholder Helpline: 0870 889 3286

Luxembourg
CLS Luxembourg Sarl 
33 Avenue de la Liberte 
1931 Luxembourg 
Tel: +352 (0)27 861 217

Clearing Bank
Royal Bank of Scotland Plc 
24 Grosvenor Place 
London 
SW1X 7HP

Joint Corporate Brokers
Liberum Capital Limited 
Ropemaker Place, Level 12 
25 Ropemaker Street 
London EC2Y 9LY

Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited 
One New Change 
London EC4M 9AF

Joh. Berenberg, Gossler & Co. KG 
London Branch 
60 Threadneedle Street 
London EC2R 8HP

Registered Auditor
Ernst & Young LLP 
Chartered Accountants 
1 More London Place 
SE1 2AF

Financial and Corporate Public Relations
Daniel J. Edelman Limited 
Southside 
105 Victoria Street 
London SW1E 6QT

Germany
CLS Germany GmbH 
Hamburg Office: 
Nagelsweg 37  
20097 Hamburg

Düsseldorf Office: 
Roßstraße 96  
40476 Düsseldorf 
Tel: +49 (0)40 29 81 39 0

France
CLS France Sarl 
36 rue Jules Verne 
92300 Levallois-Perret 
Tel: +33 (0)1 86 26 48 50

168

CLS HOLDINGS PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2023ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONBoth the paper manufacturer and printer are 
registered to the Environmental Management 
System_ISO14001 and are Forest Stewardship 
Council® (FSC)® chain-of-custody certified

Design and production

CLS Holdings plc
16 Tinworth Street
London
SE11 5AL

Tel: +44 (0)20 7582 7766
Fax: +44 (0)20 7735 2779

www.clsholdings.com
enquiries@clsholdings.com