Coca-Cola Consolidated
Annual Report 2012

Plain-text annual report

a n n u a l r e p o r t | 2 0 1 2 Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated 4100 Coca‑Cola Plaza | Charlotte, NC 28211 Mailing Address: Post Office Box 31487 | Charlotte, NC 28231 704.557.4400 www.CokeConsolidated.com facebook.com/CokeConsolidated twitter.com/CokeCCBCC Bo a rD oF D Ir eCt o rS J. Frank Harrison, III Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated H.W. McKay Belk Managing Director HWMB Advisors, LLC Alexander B. Cummings, Jr. Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer The Coca‑Cola Company Sharon A. Decker Secretary of Commerce State of North Carolina William B. Elmore Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors Dr. William H. Jones President Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated Columbia International University Morgan H. Everett Community Relations Director Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated James H. Morgan Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. Deborah H. Everhart Affiliate Broker Real Estate Brokers LLC Henry W. Flint President and Chief Operating Officer John W. Murrey, III Assistant Professor Appalachian School of Law Dennis A. Wicker Partner Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough LLP Former Lieutenant Governor State of North Carolina eXeCu tI Ve oF F I Ce rS J. Frank Harrison, III Chairman of the Board of Directors and Robert G. Chambless Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing Chief Executive Officer Henry W. Flint President and Chief Operating Officer William B. Elmore Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors William J. Billiard Vice President, Operations Finance and Chief Accounting Officer Clifford M. Deal, III Vice President and Treasurer Norman C. George President, BYB Brands, Inc. James E. Harris Senior Vice President, Shared Services and Chief Financial Officer David L. Hopkins Senior Vice President, Operations Umesh M. Kasbekar Senior Vice President, Planning and Administration David M. Katz Senior Vice President, Assistant to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Lauren C. Steele Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs Michael A. Strong Senior Vice President, Human Resources Since our founding in 1902, coca-cola Bottling co. conSolidated has been the local Coca-Cola bottler in communities large and small throughout the southeastern United States. Few companies have been around for 110 years, and we are extraordinarily privileged to have helped build some of the best-known and most-loved products in the world for more than a century. We are grateful for the communities and consumers we serve and for the thousands of dedicated Coca-Cola employees who work hard every day to make our business successful. Our Purpose is clear: To Honor God in All We Do, To Serve Others, To Pursue Excellence and To Grow Profitably. Quite simply, this is how we approach our business. We know that in order to continue to grow and thrive, we need to put our Purpose to work in our communities every day. Our Purpose drives the long-term vision for our business with clear objectives including: • Being a model for servant leadership and service to others; • Being the most preferred and trusted relationship for our consumers, customers, communities and other constituents; • Being a recognized industry leader in innovation and continuous improvement; and • Growing our revenue, profits and shareholder value. In 2012, we made great progress on all these objectives, and we want to share some of our successes with you. Being a Model for Servant leaderShip and Service to otherS While much has changed in the past 110 years, one thing that has not changed is the Company’s commitment to service, which comes in many forms. Clearly, we are 1 committed to serving our customers, the young boys themselves – now but we are also called to serve our teenagers excelling in both their consumers, our communities and our personal and academic lives. Chestnut employees. Through our stewardship Mountain Ranch is just one example initiative, Coke Cares, our Company – our employees volunteer thousands and its employees serve the physical, of hours annually across our entire emotional and spiritual needs of others franchise to make a positive impact in by providing ongoing support for our communities. nonprofits, homeless shelters, schools, nursing homes and much more. Being the MoSt Preferred and truSted relationShiP One example of an important Coke Cares initiative is our partnership Building preferred and trusting with Chestnut Mountain Ranch in relationships begins with a personal Morganton, W.V., a region enduring its relationship with our consumers and share of very tough economic times. customers and expands from there The Ranch provides a faith-centered to making those same meaningful school and home for boys in crises connections with each of our and in need of hope and healing. communities. We strive to have the Partnering with the boys’ families, best-selling refreshment beverages the organization pursues family in every community, not just because restoration and reunification through we make the best-tasting and highest- educational programs geared to help quality beverages, but also because them develop spiritually, intellectually, we are a trusted and valuable partner. physically, emotionally and socially. Its efforts inspired our West Virginia and Virginia teams to donate money, time investing in our communities Our consumers’ passion and dedica- and energy to build a much-needed, tion inspire us, and we are honored and first of its kind, boys’ dormitory they choose our refreshing products at the ranch. We are privileged to for their beverage needs, giving us a hear success stories from many of lasting place in their memories. That’s 2 FulFilling Our PurPOseF u lFi l l i n g O u r P u rP Os e why it is such a pleasure when our local good recycling practices. We also communities demonstrate an interest partnered with Harris Teeter, Kroger in restoring the historic Coca-Cola art- and BI-LO, so residents in these areas work displayed on the sides of down- can win gift certificates for groceries town buildings and other community when they recycle. We mail residents a structures. Coke Consolidated is brochure with an opt-in sticker explain- helping bring back a sense of heritage ing the rules, and to participate, they and pride by partnering with communi- put the sticker on their recycling bin ties to refurbish beautiful Coca-Cola and follow proper recycling practices. signs to once again brighten local Then the “Recycle & Win Prize Patrol” business districts. randomly visits neighborhoods and rewards people for recycling the right focusing on our environment and way. This fun and easy program is dra- Sustainable Business Practices We share our consumers’ and matically increasing the recycling rates in our communities. customers’ concern for the environ- Throughout CCBCC, we follow ment, and we are committed to reduc- sustainable practices to reduce the ing, reusing and recycling. A clean environmental impact of our activities. environment starts at home, so after We carefully track the natural you finish a bottle or can of a refresh- resources we use and the impact of ing Coca-Cola product, we want you our conservation efforts in the areas of to “Give it Back” through a personal water, energy and packaging. We also investment in recycling. In partner- encourage our business partners to ship with The Coca-Cola Company, share our commitment to conserving we created the “Coca-Cola Recycle natural resources, working diligently & Win” program to encourage good with both suppliers and customers. recycling practices. In recent years, we have teamed with several cities Our manufacturing and distribution and counties in West Virginia, Virginia, centers are located in communities North Carolina, South Carolina and that our consumers, employees and Tennessee to promote awareness of others call home, so it is essential we 4 F u lFi l l i n g O u r P u rP Os e honor them by operating cleanly and associated with active and healthy liv- safely. To that end, we have taken ing. We plan to expand this program major steps toward environmental to other cities in our territory, and as sustainability with infrastructure we encourage people to get active, improvements. For example, to we want to ensure they have access achieve our 2012 goal of cutting to clean, healthy outdoor spaces. In company-wide landfill waste in half, partnership with Sprite and Piggly we installed state-of-the-art recycling Wiggly Carolina Co., we awarded equipment in our manufacturing plants grants in 2012 to help refresh local and distribution centers. We also basketball courts, engaging the com- installed energy-efficient lighting and munity by asking them to vote for their are upgrading compressed air and favorite park. heating systems in our manufacturing plants, which reduce our energy usage. CCBCC has been providing refresh- The amount of energy we are saving ment for 110 years with a broad array each year is equivalent to the energy of products in both the Sparkling and used in more than 600 U.S. homes. We Still segments. We sell more than 250 believe all these efforts are making a brands in more than 120 packages, positive difference in our business and providing consumers with a variety of for our planet. Promoting healthy lifestyles We are also committed to encourag- refreshment choices in various serving sizes to meet their unique needs. More than 35 percent of our sales are in low- or no-calorie products, a trend that ing healthy, active lifestyles. In 2012, continues to accelerate. We want our our partnership with Charlotte Parent consumers and customers to under- Magazine, Carolinas HealthCare and stand the broad range of choices in Harris Teeter provided an opportunity the Coke Consolidated portfolio. Our to focus on that commitment. We array of products allows consumers to developed the Fit Family Challenge, choose the refreshment that fits their during which families track their lifestyle and needs on every consump- activities for a chance to win prizes tion occasion. At Coke Consolidated, 6 F u lFi l l i n g O u r P u rP Os e we aim to provide lots of refreshing thereby reducing cost and increasing choices – calories are optional. capacity. Our proprietary delivery Being a recognized induStry leader system, CooLift, enables us to deliver larger loads to customers in a shorter time period. With these and other investments in innovation and process We are intent on growing our business improvement, we strive for operating to drive value for our shareholders. excellence every single day. We are relentlessly focused on growing our market share by offering While our primary focus is our new products, new packaging and franchise Coca-Cola business, we have innovative marketing. Our Sparkling also identified other opportunities business accounts for more than to capitalize on our core strengths 80 percent of our total sales and is and bolster growth in our Coca-Cola critical to our overall success. To that business. Our brand development end, we introduced new packaging company, BYB, is leveraging our such as the 1.25-liter bottle, as well strong manufacturing, sales and as channel-specific packaging such as distribution capabilities to promote four-pack cans, 20-pack cans and a six- brands in new market segments. We pack of our smaller 7.5-ounce cans. In are utilizing our distribution fleet to the convenience channel, we recently provide transportation services across introduced a three-bottle lineup with our territory and for other partners. 16-ounce, 20-ounce and 24-ounce We are also marketing our proprietary offerings at varying price points. delivery tool, CooLift, along with other value-added logistical and We are also focused on continuing to analytical services. grow sales and market share in the fast-growing Still category. Powerade, Service, relationships, industry vitaminwater, smartwater, FUZE, and leadership – these are some of the the zero-calorie brands, Powerade things that bring our Purpose to life Zero and vitaminwater zero, have all and shape our approach to business shown solid growth and increased every single day. We are called to market share in recent years. impact all whom we serve, and we hope to make a difference in your While growth in revenue, market life and in the communities in which share and profit are all critical to our we do business. You certainly make long-term success, we also recognize a difference to us, and it is a blessing that we sell our products in a highly and a privilege to serve you. competitive market and must always find ways to make, sell and deliver our products more efficiently. That is why we invest in logistics technology to automate our ordering process. We also invest in infrastructure in key locations to automate load building, 8 le t t e r tO sh a r e hOl d e r s d ear Shareholders, Our operating results for 2012 reflect expense of $0.6 million, or $0.06 per share. Excluding these unusual items, net income and basic net income per another solid year with growth in rev- share for 2012 were $29.6 million and enue and market share. These results $3.21, compared to $33.3 million and also reflect an increase in operating $3.62 for 2011. costs due to investments we made in people and marketing, as well as We were pleased with our top-line the development of our long-term growth in 2012, with total revenues growth strategy. increasing by $53.2 million or 3.4 percent. The strong revenue The Company reported net income growth was driven in part by gains in of $27.2 million, or basic net income market share in our Sparkling portfolio per share of $2.95, compared to net as a result of new products, new income of $28.6 million, or basic packaging and marketing innovation. net income per share of $3.11 in We experienced market share growth 2011. The comparability of earnings in key channels including grocery, mass between 2012 and 2011 was impacted merchandisers and drugstores. Our by several unusual items. Our 2012 gross margin for the year increased results included non-cash gains on our by $25.1 million, or 4.0 percent, due hedging programs of $0.3 million net to strong revenue growth and lower- of tax, or $0.03 per share. The results than-expected increases in our cost also include unfavorable adjust ments of sales. Our selling, delivery and to income tax expense of $2.7 million, administrative costs for the year were or $0.29 per share. Our 2011 results up by 4.4 percent. include non-cash losses on our hedging programs of $4.1 million net Consistent with our Purpose, we are of tax, or $0.45 per share, and net relentlessly focused on growing our unfavorable adjustments to income tax business profitably. Profitable growth 1010 le t t e r tO sh a r e hOl d e r s means growing revenue, operating competitive dynamics change, our more efficiently and continuing to immediate consumption strategy strengthen our financial position. will continue to evolve. In late 2012, growing revenue we introduced a new three-bottle strategy designed for the differing needs of convenience shoppers: a We operate in highly competitive 16-ounce offering in limited brands, and developed markets. To continue generally value-priced at $0.99; a growing, we utilize a focused strategy 20-ounce bottle competitively priced to increase market share and innovate for frequent buyers; and a value-added in ways that drive consumer demand 24-ounce package. and customer value. Our volume growth for 2012 was approximately In recent years, we have seen our 1 percent, comprised of a decrease strongest growth in the value and of less than 1 percent in our Sparkling drugstore channels, as consumers beverages and an increase of more have migrated toward these channels. than 9 percent in our Still beverage We created specific packaging for portfolio, with Powerade, smartwater the value channel, since it has grown and vitaminwater leading that growth. significantly with the economic chal- lenges of the past few years. Our 2012 To spur growth in our Sparkling performance in both these channels beverage portfolio, we introduced outpaced our overall performance. the 1.25-liter package in 2011, primarily as a take-home package We focus our marketing and for our large retailers. This package promotional efforts in areas where is generally priced at $0.99, which we believe we can generate above value-oriented consumers find average return on investment. In attractive. In 2012, we expanded the the past two years, we extended or distribution of the 1.25-liter package entered into long-term commitments into the convenience channel, where with many major colleges in our it has become a highly competitive franchise territory. Our relationships offering, helping us grow revenue and with these colleges not only help market share. us build brand awareness and loyalty among a key target group of The convenience channel is our consumers, but also provide us with second-largest channel and very valuable insight on our brands and important to our goal of long-term consumer tastes. profitable growth – driving profit for today, while creating the consumers iMProving efficiency of tomorrow. During the past several and productivity years, we have introduced new bottle sizes and price points for Along with growing our revenue, immediate consumption in this key it is imperative that we continue channel with resulting market share to improve the efficiency and gains in many of our territories. As effectiveness of our business. During 1212 le t t e r tO sh a r e hOl d e r s the past several years, we have while reducing miles driven and the experienced significant increases in number of delivery stops. CooLift also raw materials, packaging, fuel and prompted changes in our warehouses other input costs. In the competitive and how we build loads for distribu- market in which we operate, we tion. In our largest distribution center cannot always pass additional costs in Charlotte, we installed an automated to the customer. To offset higher order-building system that has dramati- costs, we continue to identify ways cally increased the number of cases the to leverage technology, develop new warehouse can handle. The increased tools and enhance or change existing capacity has allowed us to consolidate processes. Our focus on continuous some smaller warehouses and serve improvement and productivity is additional territories directly from company-wide, from sourcing and Charlotte. We are in the process of ordering raw materials to processing installing a second automated order- customer payments. building system in Nashville, Tenn., Delivery expenses are one of the larg- and evaluating the economic benefits est items in our selling, delivery and of installing systems in other areas in administrative costs, and we have made the future. significant progress in reducing or slowing the growth rate of these costs. Our improved delivery and warehouse Several years ago, we developed the operations have provided other benefits proprietary delivery tool CooLift. This including better inventory control, tool transformed the way we deliver decreased shrinkage costs and a product, moving away from traditional reduction in losses due to accidents. side-bay beverage trucks with drivers During the past five years, the number building loads at the customer site. of workers’ compensation claims and We now primarily use a rear-loaded vehicle accidents declined by more vehicle, from which our drivers can than 50 percent. Serving our employees simply wheel a pre-built pallet into the begins with providing them a safe place customer’s store. CooLift has increased to work. These are just a few examples the number of cases delivered per stop, of the ancillary benefits provided by 1414 le t t e r tO sh a r e hOl d e r s our ongoing efforts to improve productivity and efficiency throughout our operations. Strengthening our financial PoSition In order to effectively operate our business, we must continue to make significant capital investments in facilities, transportation, and equipment and technology. During the past decade, we have focused on reducing our leverage and achieving a stronger financial position. We have reduced the Company’s long-term debt by more than 50 percent. This debt reduction and related lower interest payments free up capital that we can invest in our operations to drive revenue growth. The considerable improvement in our financial position also allows us to take advantage of strategic growth opportunities as they arise. Coca-Cola Consolidated employees are very pas- sionate and determined about growing our revenue, achieving greater efficiency and productivity, and strengthening our financial position. This talented team loves the brands we sell and the business we are in and meets the challenges of our business with energy and creativity every single day. They drive our Purpose, and we are honored to serve them. We are pleased with the Company’s progress in 2012. We are grateful for your continued support and very optimistic about the Company’s future. J. Frank Harrison, III Henry W. Flint Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer President and Chief Operating Officer 15 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K Í ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 30, 2012 Commission file number 0-9286 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 56-0950585 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 4100 Coca-Cola Plaza, Charlotte, North Carolina 28211 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (704) 557-4400 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered The NASDAQ Global Select Market Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ‘ No Í Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ‘ No Í Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes Í No ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes Í No ‘ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Í Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ‘ Smaller reporting company ‘ Non-accelerated filer ‘ Accelerated filer Í Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ‘ No Í State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Common Stock, $l.00 Par Value Class B Common Stock, $l.00 Par Value Market Value as of June 29, 2012 $299,362,116 * * No market exists for the shares of Class B Common Stock, which is neither registered under Section 12 of the Act nor subject to Section 15(d) of the Act. The Class B Common Stock is convertible into Common Stock on a share-for-share basis at the option of the holder. Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. Class Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value Class B Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value Outstanding as of March 1, 2013 7,141,447 2,088,842 Portions of Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act with respect to the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Part III, Items 10-14 Documents Incorporated by Reference Table of Contents Part I Item 1. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 2. Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 3. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Executive Officers of the Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Part II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 6. Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Part III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1 11 18 18 20 20 20 22 24 25 55 56 105 105 105 106 106 106 106 106 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 115 Part IV Item 1. Business Introduction PART I Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, a Delaware corporation (together with its majority-owned subsidiaries, the “Company”), produces, markets and distributes nonalcoholic beverages, primarily products of The Coca-Cola Company, Atlanta, Georgia (“The Coca-Cola Company”), which include some of the most recognized and popular beverage brands in the world. The Company, which was incorporated in 1980, and its predecessors have been in the nonalcoholic beverage manufacturing and distribution business since 1902. The Company is the largest independent Coca-Cola bottler in the United States. As of December 30, 2012, The Coca-Cola Company had a 34.8% interest in the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, representing 5.1% of the total voting power of the Company’s Common Stock and Class B Common Stock voting together as a single class. The Coca-Cola Company does not own any shares of Class B Common Stock of the Company. J. Frank Harrison, III, the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, currently owns or controls approximately 85% of the combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. General Nonalcoholic beverage products can be broken down into two categories: • Sparkling beverages – beverages with carbonation, including energy drinks; and • Still beverages – beverages without carbonation, including bottled water, tea, ready-to-drink coffee, enhanced water, juices and sports drinks. Sales of sparkling beverages were approximately 82%, 83% and 83% of total net sales for fiscal 2012 respectively. Sales of still beverages were (“2012”), approximately 18%, 17% and 17% of total net sales for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. fiscal 2011 (“2011”) and fiscal 2010 (“2010”), The Company holds Cola Beverage Agreements and Allied Beverage Agreements under which it produces, distributes and markets, in certain regions, sparkling beverages of The Coca-Cola Company. The Company also holds Still Beverage Agreements under which it distributes and markets in certain regions still beverages of The Coca-Cola Company such as POWERade, vitaminwater and Minute Maid Juices To Go and produces, distributes and markets Dasani water products. The Company holds agreements to produce, distribute and market Dr Pepper in some of its regions. The Company also distributes and markets various other products, including Monster Energy products and Sundrop, in one or more of the Company’s regions under agreements with the companies that hold and license the use of their trademarks for these beverages. In addition, the Company produces beverages for other Coca-Cola bottlers. In some instances, the Company distributes beverages without a written agreement. The Company’s principal sparkling beverage is Coca-Cola. In each of the last three fiscal years, sales of products bearing the “Coca-Cola” or “Coke” trademark have accounted for more than half of the Company’s bottle/can volume to retail customers. In total, products of The Coca-Cola Company accounted for approximately 88% of the Company’s bottle/can volume to retail customers during 2012, 2011 and 2010. The Company offers a range of flavors designed to meet the demands of the Company’s consumers. The main packaging materials for the Company’s beverages are plastic bottles and aluminum cans. In addition, the Company provides restaurants and other immediate consumption outlets with fountain products (“post-mix”). Fountain products are dispensed through equipment that mixes the fountain syrup with carbonated or still water, enabling fountain retailers to sell finished products to consumers in cups or glasses. In recent years, the Company has developed and begun to market and distribute certain products which it owns. These products include Country Breeze tea, Tum-E Yummies, a vitamin-C enhanced flavored drink and Fuel in a Bottle power shots. The Company markets and sells these products nationally. 1 The Coca-Cola Company acquired Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. (“CCE”) on October 2, 2010. In connection with the transaction, CCE changed its name to Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. (“CCR”) and transferred its beverage operations outside of North America to an independent third party. As a result of the transaction, the North American operations of CCE are now included in CCR. CCE began distributing Tum-E Yummies in the first quarter of 2010 and CCR is continuing to do so nationally. Certain other Coca-Cola franchise bottlers are also distributing Tum-E Yummies. References to “CCR” refer to CCR and CCE as it existed prior to the acquisition by The Coca-Cola Company. The following table sets forth some of the Company’s most important products, including both products that The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies have licensed to the Company and products that the Company owns. The Coca-Cola Company Products Licensed by Other Beverage Companies Dr Pepper Diet Dr Pepper Sundrop Monster Energy products Company Owned Products Tum-E Yummies Country Breeze tea Fuel in a Bottle Sparkling Beverages (including Energy Products) Coca-Cola Diet Coke Coca-Cola Zero Sprite Fanta Flavors Sprite Zero Mello Yello Cherry Coke Seagrams Ginger Ale Cherry Coke Zero Diet Coke Splenda® Fresca Pibb Xtra Barqs Root Beer TAB Full Throttle NOS® Beverage Agreements Still Beverages glacéau smartwater glacéau vitaminwater Dasani Dasani Flavors Powerade Powerade Zero Minute Maid Adult Refreshments Minute Maid Juices To Go Nestea Gold Peak tea FUZE V8 juice products from Campbell The Company holds contracts with The Coca-Cola Company which entitle the Company to produce, market and distribute in its exclusive territory The Coca-Cola Company’s nonalcoholic beverages in bottles, cans and five gallon pressurized pre-mix containers. The Company has similar arrangements with Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. and other beverage companies. Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements with The Coca-Cola Company. The Company purchases concentrates from The Coca-Cola Company and produces, markets and distributes its principal sparkling beverages within its territories under two basic forms of beverage agreements with The Coca-Cola Company: (i) beverage agreements that cover sparkling beverages bearing the trademark “Coca-Cola” or “Coke” (the “Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages” and “Cola Beverage Agreements”), and (ii) beverage agreements that cover other sparkling beverages of The Coca-Cola Company (the “Allied Beverages” and “Allied Beverage Agreements”) (referred to collectively in this report as the “Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements”), although in some instances the Company distributes sparkling beverages without a written agreement. The Company is a party to Cola Beverage Agreements and Allied Beverage Agreements for various specified territories. Cola Beverage Agreements with The Coca-Cola Company. Exclusivity. The Cola Beverage Agreements provide that the Company will purchase its entire requirements of concentrates or syrups for Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages from The Coca-Cola Company at 2 prices, terms of payment, and other terms and conditions of supply determined from time-to-time by The Coca-Cola Company at its sole discretion. The Company may not produce, distribute, or handle cola products other than those of The Coca-Cola Company. The Company has the exclusive right to manufacture and distribute Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages for sale in authorized containers within its territories. The Coca-Cola Company may determine, at its sole discretion, what types of containers are authorized for use with products of The Coca-Cola Company. The Company may not sell Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages outside its territories. Company Obligations. The Company is obligated to: • maintain such plant and equipment, staff and distribution and vending facilities that are capable of manufacturing, packaging, and distributing Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages in accordance with the Cola Beverage Agreements and in sufficient quantities to satisfy fully the demand for these beverages in its territories; • undertake adequate quality control measures and maintain sanitation standards prescribed by The Coca-Cola Company; • develop, stimulate and satisfy fully the demand for Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages in its territories; • use all approved means and spend such funds on advertising and other forms of marketing as may be reasonably required to satisfy that objective; and • maintain such sound financial capacity as may be reasonably necessary to ensure its performance of its obligations to The Coca-Cola Company. The Company is required to meet annually with The Coca-Cola Company to present its marketing, management, and advertising plans for the Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages for the upcoming year, including financial plans showing that the Company has the consolidated financial capacity to perform its duties and obligations to The Coca-Cola Company. The Coca-Cola Company may not unreasonably withhold approval of such plans. If the Company carries out its plans in all material respects, the Company will be deemed to have satisfied its obligations to develop, stimulate, and satisfy fully the demand for the Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages and to maintain the requisite financial capacity. Failure to carry out such plans in all material respects would constitute an event of default that if not cured within 120 days of written notice of the failure would give The Coca-Cola Company the right to terminate the Cola Beverage Agreements. If the Company, at any time, fails to carry out a plan in all material respects in any geographic segment of its territory, as defined by The Coca-Cola Company, and if such failure is not cured within six months of written notice of the failure, The Coca-Cola Company may reduce the territory covered by that Cola Beverage Agreement by eliminating the portion of the territory in which such failure has occurred. The Coca-Cola Company has no obligation under the Cola Beverage Agreements to participate with the Company in expenditures for advertising and marketing. As it has in the past, The Coca-Cola Company may contribute to such expenditures and undertake independent advertising and marketing activities, as well as advertising and sales promotion programs which require mutual cooperation and financial support of the Company. The future levels of marketing funding support and promotional funds provided by The Coca-Cola Company may vary materially from the levels provided during the periods covered by the information included in this report. Acquisition of Other Bottlers. If the Company acquires control, directly or indirectly, of any bottler of Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages, or any party controlling a bottler of Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages, the Company must cause the acquired bottler to amend its agreement for the Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages to conform to the terms of the Cola Beverage Agreements. Term and Termination. The Cola Beverage Agreements are perpetual, but they are subject to termination by The Coca-Cola Company upon the occurrence of an event of default by the Company. Events of default with respect to each Cola Beverage Agreement include: • production, sale or ownership in any entity which produces or sells any cola product not authorized by The Coca-Cola Company or a cola product that might be confused with or is an imitation of the trade dress, trademark, tradename or authorized container of a cola product of The Coca-Cola Company; 3 • insolvency, bankruptcy, dissolution, receivership, or the like; • any disposition by the Company of any voting securities of any bottling company subsidiary without the consent of The Coca-Cola Company; and • any material breach of any of its obligations under that Cola Beverage Agreement that remains unresolved for 120 days after written notice by The Coca-Cola Company. If any Cola Beverage Agreement is terminated because of an event of default, The Coca-Cola Company has the right to terminate all other Cola Beverage Agreements the Company holds. No Assignments. The Company is prohibited from assigning, transferring or pledging its Cola Beverage Agreements or any interest therein, whether voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior consent of The Coca-Cola Company. Allied Beverage Agreements with The Coca-Cola Company. The Allied Beverages are beverages of The Coca-Cola Company or its subsidiaries that are sparkling beverages, but not Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages. The Allied Beverage Agreements contain provisions that are similar to those of the Cola Beverage Agreements with respect to the sale of beverages outside its territories, transfer restrictions, and related matters but have certain authorized containers, planning, quality control, significant differences from the Cola Beverage Agreements. Exclusivity. Under the Allied Beverage Agreements, the Company has exclusive rights to distribute the Allied Beverages in authorized containers in specified territories. Like the Cola Beverage Agreements, the Company has advertising, marketing, and promotional obligations, but without restriction for most brands as to the marketing of products with similar flavors, as long as there is no manufacturing or handling of other products that would imitate, infringe upon, or cause confusion with, the products of The Coca-Cola Company. The Coca-Cola Company has the right to discontinue any or all Allied Beverages, and the Company has a right, but not an obligation, under the Allied Beverage Agreements to elect to market any new beverage introduced by The Coca-Cola Company under the trademarks covered by the respective Allied Beverage Agreements. Term and Termination. Allied Beverage Agreements have a term of 10 years and are renewable by the Company for an additional 10 years at the end of each term. Renewal is at the Company’s option. The Company currently intends to renew substantially all of the Allied Beverage Agreements as they expire. The Allied Beverage Agreements are subject to termination in the event of default by the Company. The Coca-Cola Company may terminate an Allied Beverage Agreement in the event of: • insolvency, bankruptcy, dissolution, receivership, or the like; • termination of a Cola Beverage Agreement by either party for any reason; or • any material breach of any of the Company’s obligations under that Allied Beverage Agreement that remains unresolved for 120 days after required prior written notice by The Coca-Cola Company. Supplementary Agreement Relating to Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements with The Coca-Cola Company. The Company and The Coca-Cola Company are also parties to a Letter Agreement (the “Supplementary Agreement”) that modifies some of the provisions of the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements. The Supplementary Agreement provides that The Coca-Cola Company will: • exercise good faith and fair dealing in its relationship with the Company under the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements; • offer marketing funding support and exercise its rights under the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements in a manner consistent with its dealings with comparable bottlers; • offer to the Company any written amendment to the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements (except amendments dealing with transfer of ownership) which it offers to any other bottler in the United States; and 4 • subject to certain limited exceptions, sell syrups and concentrates to the Company at prices no greater than those charged to other bottlers which are parties to contracts substantially similar to the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements. The Supplementary Agreement permits transfers of the Company’s capital stock that would otherwise be limited by the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements. Pricing of Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages and Allied Beverages. Pursuant to the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements, except as provided in the Supplementary Agreement and the Incidence Pricing Agreement (described below), The Coca-Cola Company establishes the prices charged to the Company for concentrates of Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages and Allied Beverages. The Coca-Cola Company has no rights under the beverage agreements to establish the resale prices at which the Company sells its products. The Company entered into an agreement (the “Incidence Pricing Agreement”) with The Coca-Cola Company to test an incidence-based concentrate pricing model for 2008 for all Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages and Allied Beverages for which the Company purchases concentrate from The Coca-Cola Company. During the term of the Incidence Pricing Agreement, the pricing of the concentrates for the Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages and Allied Beverages is governed by the Incidence Pricing Agreement rather than the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements. The concentrate price The Coca-Cola Company charges under the Incidence Pricing Agreement is impacted by a number of factors including the Company’s pricing of finished products, the channels in which the finished products are sold and package mix. The Coca-Cola Company must give the Company at least 90 days written notice before changing the price the Company pays for the concentrate. The Incidence Pricing Agreement has been extended through December 31, 2013 under the same terms that were in effect for 2009 through 2012. Still Beverage Agreements with The Coca-Cola Company. The Company purchases and distributes certain still beverages such as sports drinks and juice drinks from The Coca-Cola Company, or its designees or joint ventures, and produces, markets and distributes Dasani water products, pursuant to the terms of marketing and distribution agreements (the “Still Beverage Agreements”). In some instances the Company distributes certain still beverages without a written agreement. The Still Beverage Agreements contain provisions that are similar to the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements with respect to authorized containers, planning, quality control, transfer restrictions, and related matters but have certain significant differences from the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements. Exclusivity. Unlike the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements, which grant the Company exclusivity in the distribution of the covered beverages in its territory, the Still Beverage Agreements grant exclusivity but permit The Coca-Cola Company to test-market the still beverage products in its territory, subject to the Company’s right of first refusal, and to sell the still beverages to commissaries for delivery to retail outlets in the territory where still beverages are consumed on-premises, such as restaurants. The Coca-Cola Company must pay the Company certain fees for lost volume, delivery, and taxes in the event of such commissary sales. Approved alternative route to market projects undertaken by the Company, The Coca-Cola Company, and other bottlers of Coca-Cola products would, in some instances, permit delivery of certain products of The Coca-Cola Company into the territories of almost all bottlers, in exchange for compensation in most circumstances, despite the terms of the beverage agreements making such territories exclusive. Also, under the Still Beverage Agreements, the Company may not sell other beverages in the same product category. Pricing. The Coca-Cola Company, at its sole discretion, establishes the prices the Company must pay for the still beverages or, in the case of Dasani, the concentrate or finished goods, but has agreed, under certain circumstances for some products, to give the benefit of more favorable pricing if such pricing is offered to other bottlers of Coca-Cola products. Term. Each of the Still Beverage Agreements has a term of 10 or 15 years and is renewable by the Company for an additional 10 years at the end of each term. The Company currently intends to renew substantially all of the Still Beverage Agreements as they expire. 5 Other Beverage Agreements with The Coca-Cola Company. The Company has entered into a distribution agreement with Energy Brands, Inc. (“Energy Brands”), a wholly owned subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company. Energy Brands, also known as glacéau, is a producer and distributor of branded enhanced water products including vitaminwater and smartwater. The agreement has a term of 10 years, and will automatically renew for succeeding 10-year terms, subject to a 12-month nonrenewal notification by the Company. The agreement covers most of the Company’s territories, requires the Company to distribute Energy Brands enhanced water products exclusively, and permits Energy Brands to distribute the products in some channels within the Company’s territories. The Company is distributing fruit and vegetable juice beverages of the Campbell Soup Company (“Campbell”) under an interim subdistribution agreement with The Coca-Cola Company. The Campbell interim subdistribution agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice. The interim agreement covers all of the Company’s territories, and permits Campbell and certain other sellers of Campbell beverages to continue distribution in the Company’s territories. The Company purchases Campbell beverages from a subsidiary of Campbell under a separate purchase agreement. The Company also sells Coca-Cola and other post-mix products of The Coca-Cola Company on a non- exclusive basis. The Coca-Cola Company establishes the prices charged to the Company for post-mix products of The Coca-Cola Company. In addition, the Company produces some products for sale to other Coca-Cola bottlers and CCR. These sales have lower margins but allow the Company to achieve higher utilization of its production equipment and facilities. The Company entered into an agreement with The Coca-Cola Company regarding brand innovation and distribution collaboration. Under the agreement, the Company grants The Coca-Cola Company the option to purchase any nonalcoholic beverage brands owned by the Company. The option is exercisable as to each brand at a formula-based price during the two-year period that begins after that brand has achieved a specified level of net operating revenue or, if earlier, beginning five years after the introduction of that brand into the market with a minimum level of net operating revenue, with the exception that with respect to brands owned at the date of the letter agreement, the five-year period does not begin earlier than the date of the letter agreement. Beverage Agreements with Other Licensors. The Company has beverage agreements with Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. for Dr Pepper and Sundrop brands which are similar to those for the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements. These beverage agreements are perpetual in nature but may be terminated by the Company upon 90 days’ notice. The price the beverage companies may charge for syrup or concentrate is set by the beverage companies from time to time. These beverage agreements also contain similar restrictions on the use of trademarks, approved bottles, cans and labels and sale of imitations or substitutes as well as termination for cause provisions. The Company also sells post-mix products of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. The Company is distributing Monster brand energy drinks under a distribution agreement with Hansen Beverage Company, including Monster and Java Monster. The agreement contains provisions that are similar to the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements with respect to pricing, promotion, planning, territory and trademark restrictions, transfer restrictions, and related matters as well as termination for cause provisions. The agreement has a 20 year term and will renew automatically. The agreement may be terminated without cause by either party. However, any such termination by Hansen Beverage Company requires compensation in the form of severance payments to the Company under the terms of the agreement. The territories covered by beverage agreements with other licensors are not always aligned with the territories covered by the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements but are generally within those territory boundaries. Sales of beverages by the Company under these other agreements represented approximately 12% of the Company’s bottle/can volume to retail customers for 2012, 2011 and 2010. 6 Markets and Production and Distribution Facilities The Company currently holds bottling rights from The Coca-Cola Company covering the majority of North Carolina, South Carolina and West Virginia, and portions of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Florida. The total population within the Company’s bottling territory is approximately 20 million. The Company currently operates in seven principal geographic markets. Certain information regarding each of these markets follows: 1. North Carolina. This region includes the majority of North Carolina, including Raleigh, Greensboro, Winston-Salem, High Point, Hickory, Asheville, Fayetteville, Wilmington, Charlotte and the surrounding areas. The region has a population of approximately 9 million. A production/distribution facility is located in Charlotte and 12 sales distribution facilities are located in the region. 2. South Carolina. This region includes the majority of South Carolina, including Charleston, Columbia, Greenville, Myrtle Beach and the surrounding areas. The region has a population of approximately 4 million. There are 6 sales distribution facilities in the region. 3. South Alabama. This region includes a portion of southwestern Alabama, including Mobile and surrounding areas, and a portion of southeastern Mississippi. The region has a population of approximately 1 million. A production/distribution facility is located in Mobile and 4 sales distribution facilities are located in the region. 4. South Georgia. This region includes a small portion of eastern Alabama, a portion of southwestern Georgia including Columbus and surrounding areas and a portion of the Florida Panhandle. This region has a population of approximately 1 million. There are 4 sales distribution facilities located in the region. 5. Middle Tennessee. This region includes a portion of central Tennessee, including Nashville and surrounding areas, a small portion of southern Kentucky and a small portion of northwest Alabama. The region has a population of approximately 2 million. A production/distribution facility is located in Nashville and 3 sales distribution facilities are located in the region. 6. Western Virginia. This region includes most of southwestern Virginia, including Roanoke and surrounding areas, a portion of the southern piedmont of Virginia, a portion of northeastern Tennessee and a portion of southeastern West Virginia. The region has a population of approximately 2 million. A production/distribution facility is located in Roanoke and 4 sales distribution facilities are located in the region. 7. West Virginia. This region includes most of the state of West Virginia and a portion of southwestern Pennsylvania. The region has a population of approximately 1 million. There are 8 sales distribution facilities located in the region. The Company is a member of South Atlantic Canners, Inc. (“SAC”), a manufacturing cooperative located in Bishopville, South Carolina. All eight members of SAC are Coca-Cola bottlers and each member has equal voting rights. The Company receives a fee for managing the day-to-day operations of SAC pursuant to a management agreement. Management fees earned from SAC were $1.5 million, $1.6 million and $1.5 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. SAC’s bottling lines supply a portion of the Company’s volume requirements for finished products. The Company has a commitment with SAC that requires minimum annual purchases of 17.5 million cases of finished products through May 2014. Purchases from SAC by the Company for finished products were $141 million, $134 million and $131 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, or 27.5 million cases, 26.2 million cases and 26.1 million cases of finished product, respectively. Raw Materials In addition to concentrates obtained from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies for use in its beverage manufacturing, the Company also purchases sweetener, carbon dioxide, plastic bottles, cans, closures and other packaging materials as well as equipment for the production, distribution and marketing of nonalcoholic beverages. 7 The Company purchases substantially all of its plastic bottles (12-ounce, 16-ounce, 20-ounce, 24-ounce, half-liter, 1-liter, 1.25-liter, 2-liter and 300 ml sizes) from manufacturing plants owned and operated by Southeastern Container and Western Container, two entities owned by various Coca-Cola bottlers including the Company. The Company currently obtains all of its aluminum cans (7.5-ounce, 12-ounce and 16-ounce sizes) from two domestic suppliers. None of the materials or supplies used by the Company are currently in short supply, although the supply of specific materials (including plastic bottles, which are formulated using petroleum-based products) could be adversely affected by strikes, weather conditions, governmental controls or international or domestic geopolitical or other events affecting or threatening to affect the supply of petroleum. Along with all the other Coca-Cola bottlers in the United States, the Company is a member in Coca-Cola Bottlers’ Sales and Services Company, LLC (“CCBSS”), which was formed in 2003 for the purposes of facilitating various procurement functions and distributing certain specified beverage products of The Coca-Cola Company with the intention of enhancing the efficiency and competitiveness of the Coca-Cola bottling system in the United States. CCBSS has negotiated the procurement for the majority of the Company’s raw materials (excluding concentrate) since 2004. The Company is exposed to price risk on commodities such as aluminum, corn, PET resin (a petroleum- based product) and fuel which affects the cost of raw materials used in the production of finished products. The Company both produces and procures these finished products. Examples of the raw materials affected are aluminum cans and plastic bottles used for packaging and high fructose corn syrup used as a product ingredient. Further, the Company is exposed to commodity price risk on oil which impacts the Company’s cost of fuel used in the movement and delivery of the Company’s products. The Company participates in commodity hedging and risk mitigation programs administered both by CCBSS and by the Company itself. In addition, there is no limit on the price The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies can charge for concentrate, although, under the Incidence Pricing Agreement, The Coca-Cola Company must give the Company at least 90 days written notice of a pricing change. Customers and Marketing The Company’s products are sold and distributed directly to retail stores and other outlets, including food markets, institutional accounts and vending machine outlets. During 2012, approximately 68% of the Company’s bottle/can volume to retail customers was sold for future consumption. The remaining bottle/can volume to retail customers of approximately 32% was sold for immediate consumption, primarily through dispensing machines owned either by the Company, retail outlets or third party vending companies. The Company’s largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., accounted for approximately 22% of the Company’s total bottle/can volume to retail customers and the second largest customer, Food Lion, LLC, accounted for approximately 8% of the Company’s total bottle/can volume to retail customers. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Food Lion, LLC accounted for approximately 15% and 6% of the Company’s total net sales, respectively. The loss of either Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. or Food Lion, LLC as customers would have a material adverse effect on the Company. All of the Company’s beverage sales are to customers in the United States. New product introductions, packaging changes and sales promotions have been the primary sales and marketing practices in the nonalcoholic beverage industry in recent years and have required and are expected to continue to require substantial expenditures. Brand introductions from The Coca-Cola Company in recent years include Coca-Cola Zero, Dasani flavors, Full Throttle and Gold Peak tea products. In 2007, the Company began distribution of its own products, Country Breeze tea and Tum-E Yummies. In 2011, the Company began distribution of Fuel in a Bottle Energy Shot and Fuel in a Bottle Protein Shot. In addition, the Company also began distribution of NOS® products (energy drinks from FUZE, a subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company), juice products from FUZE and V8 products from Campbell during 2007. In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company began distribution of glacéau products, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company that produces branded enhanced beverages including vitaminwater and smartwater. The Company entered into a distribution agreement in October 2008 with subsidiaries of Hansen Natural Corporation, the developer, marketer, seller and distributor of Monster Energy drinks, the leading volume brand in the U.S. energy drink category. Under this 8 agreement, the Company began distributing Monster Energy drinks in certain of the Company’s territories in November 2008. New packaging introductions include the 1.25-liter bottle in 2011, the 7.5-ounce sleek can during 2010, the 2-liter contour bottle for Coca-Cola products during 2009 and the 20-ounce “grip” bottle during 2007. During 2008, the Company tested the 16-ounce bottle/24-ounce bottle package in select convenience stores and introduced it companywide in 2009. New product and packaging introductions have resulted in increased operating costs for the Company due to special marketing efforts, obsolescence of replaced items and, in some cases, higher raw material costs. The Company sells its products primarily in nonrefillable bottles and cans, in varying proportions from market to market. For example, there may be as many as 24 different packages for Diet Coke within a single geographic area. Bottle/can volume to retail customers during 2012 was approximately 46% cans, 53% bottles and 1% other containers. Advertising in various media, primarily television and radio, is relied upon extensively in the marketing of the Company’s products. The Coca-Cola Company and Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (the “Beverage Companies”) make substantial expenditures on advertising in the Company’s territories. The Company has also benefited from national advertising programs conducted by the Beverage Companies. In addition, the Company expends substantial funds on its own behalf for extensive local sales promotions of the Company’s products. Historically, these expenses have been partially offset by marketing funding support which the Beverage Companies provide to the Company in support of a variety of marketing programs, such as point-of-sale displays and merchandising programs. However, the Beverage Companies are under no obligation to provide the Company with marketing funding support in the future. The substantial outlays which the Company makes for marketing and merchandising programs are generally regarded as necessary to maintain or increase revenue, and any significant curtailment of marketing funding support provided by the Beverage Companies for marketing programs which benefit the Company could have a material adverse effect on the operating and financial results of the Company. Seasonality Sales of the Company’s products are seasonal with the highest sales volume occurring in May, June, July and August. The Company has adequate production capacity to meet sales demand for sparkling and still beverages during these peak periods. See “Item 2. Properties” for information relating to utilization of the Company’s production facilities. Sales volume can be impacted by weather conditions. Competition The nonalcoholic beverage market is highly competitive. The Company’s competitors include bottlers and distributors of nationally advertised and marketed products, regionally advertised and marketed products, as well as bottlers and distributors of private label beverages in supermarket stores. The sparkling beverage market (including energy products) comprised 83% of the Company’s bottle/can volume to retail customers in 2012. In each region in which the Company operates, between 85% and 95% of sparkling beverage sales in bottles, cans and other containers are accounted for by the Company and its principal competitors, which in each region includes the local bottler of Pepsi-Cola and, in some regions, the local bottler of Dr Pepper, Royal Crown and/or 7-Up products. The principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage industry are point-of-sale merchandising, new product introductions, new vending and dispensing equipment, packaging changes, pricing, price promotions, product quality, retail space management, customer service, frequency of distribution and to these methods of advertising. The Company believes it competition. is competitive in its territories with respect Government Regulation The production and marketing of beverages are subject to the rules and regulations of the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and other federal, state and local health agencies. The FDA also 9 regulates the labeling of containers. In February 2013, health advocates and public health officials from major cities in the United States submitted a petition requesting the FDA to regulate the amount of caloric sweeteners in sparkling and other beverages. The FDA has not responded to the petition. As a manufacturer, distributor and seller of beverage products of The Coca-Cola Company and other soft drink manufacturers in exclusive territories, the Company is subject to antitrust laws of general applicability. However, pursuant to the United States Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act, soft drink bottlers such as the Company may have an exclusive right to manufacture, distribute and sell a soft drink product in a defined geographic territory if that soft drink product is in substantial and effective competition with other products of the same general class in the market. The Company believes such competition exists in each of the exclusive geographic territories in the United States in which the Company operates. From time to time, legislation has been proposed in Congress and by certain state and local governments which would prohibit the sale of soft drink products in nonrefillable bottles and cans or require a mandatory deposit as a means of encouraging the return of such containers in an attempt to reduce solid waste and litter. The Company is currently not impacted by this type of proposed legislation. Soft drink and similar-type taxes have been in place in West Virginia and Tennessee for several years. Proposals have been introduced by members of Congress and certain state governments that would impose excise and other special taxes on certain beverages that the Company sells. The Company cannot predict whether any such legislation will be enacted. Some states and localities have also proposed barring the use of food stamps by recipients in their jurisdictions to purchase some of the products the Company manufactures. The United States Department of Agriculture rejected such a proposal by a major American city as recently as 2011. The Company has experienced public policy challenges regarding the sale of soft drinks in schools, particularly elementary, middle and high schools. At December 30, 2012, a number of states had regulations restricting the sale of soft drinks and other foods in schools. Many of these restrictions have existed for several years in connection with subsidized meal programs in schools. The focus has more recently turned to the growing health, nutrition and obesity concerns of today’s youth. Restrictive legislation, if widely enacted, could have an adverse impact on the Company’s products, image and reputation. The Company is subject to audit by taxing authorities in jurisdictions where it conducts business. These audits may result in assessments that are subsequently resolved with the authorities or potentially through the courts. Management believes the Company has adequately provided for any assessments that are likely to result from these audits; however, final assessments, if any, could be different than the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements. Environmental Remediation The Company does not currently have any material capital expenditure commitments for environmental compliance or environmental remediation for any of its properties. The Company does not believe compliance with federal, state and local provisions that have been enacted or adopted regarding the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, will have a material effect on its capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. Employees As of February 1, 2013, the Company had approximately 5,000 full-time employees, of whom approximately 400 were union members. The total number of employees, including part-time employees, was approximately 6,500. Approximately 7% of the Company’s labor force is covered by collective bargaining agreements. One collective bargaining agreement covering approximately .4% of the Company’s employees expired during 2012 and the Company entered into a new agreement in 2012. Two collective bargaining agreements covering approximately .7% of the Company’s employees will expire during 2013. 10 Exchange Act Reports of free available The Company makes Internet website, www.cokeconsolidated.com, the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC maintains an Internet website, www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information filed electronically with the SEC. Any materials that the Company files with the SEC may also be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D. C. 20549. the Company’s through charge Information on the operations of the Public Reference Room is available by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC- 0330. The information provided on the Company’s website is not part of this report and is not incorporated herein by reference. Item 1A. Risk Factors In addition to other information in this Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating the Company’s business. The Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. The Company may not be able to respond successfully to changes in the marketplace. The Company operates in the highly competitive nonalcoholic beverage industry and faces strong competition from other general and specialty beverage companies. The Company’s response to continued and increased customer and competitor consolidations and marketplace competition may result in lower than expected net pricing of the Company’s products. The Company’s ability to gain or maintain the Company’s share of sales or gross margins may be limited by the actions of the Company’s competitors, which may have advantages in setting their prices due to lower raw material costs. Competitive pressures in the markets in which the Company operates may cause channel and product mix to shift away from more profitable channels and packages. If the Company is unable to maintain or increase volume in higher-margin products and in packages sold through higher-margin channels (e.g., immediate consumption), pricing and gross margins could be adversely affected. The Company’s efforts to improve pricing may result in lower than expected sales volume. Acquisitions of bottlers by their franchisors may lead to uncertainty in the Coca-Cola bottler system or adversely impact the Company. The Coca-Cola Company acquired the North American operations of Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. in 2010, and the Company’s primary competitors were acquired at approximately the same time by their franchisor. These transactions may cause uncertainty within the Coca-Cola bottler system or adversely impact the Company and its business. At this time, it remains uncertain what the ultimate impact of these transactions will be on the Company’s business and financial results. Changes in how significant customers market or promote the Company’s products could reduce revenue. The Company’s revenue is affected by how significant customers market or promote the Company’s products. Revenue has been negatively impacted by less aggressive price promotion by some retailers in the future consumption channels over the past several years. If the Company’s significant customers change the manner in which they market or promote the Company’s products, the Company’s revenue and profitability could be adversely impacted. Changes in the Company’s top customer relationships could impact revenues and profitability. The Company is exposed to risks resulting from several large customers that account for a significant portion of its bottle/can volume and revenue. The Company’s two largest customers accounted for approximately 30% of the Company’s 2012 bottle/can volume to retail customers and approximately 21% of the Company’s total net sales. The loss of one or both of these customers could adversely affect the Company’s results of 11 operations. These customers typically make purchase decisions based on a combination of price, product quality, consumer demand and customer service performance and generally do not enter into long-term contracts. In addition, these significant customers may re-evaluate or refine their business practices related to inventories, product displays, logistics or other aspects of the customer-supplier relationship. The Company’s results of operations could be adversely affected if revenue from one or more of these customers is significantly reduced or if the cost of complying with these customers’ demands is significant. If receivables from one or more of these customers become uncollectible, the Company’s results of operations may be adversely impacted. One of these customers has announced store closing in the United States, but the Company has not determined if this could affect the Company’s results of operations. Changes in public and consumer preferences related to nonalcoholic beverages could reduce demand for the Company’s products and reduce profitability. The Company’s business depends substantially on consumer tastes and preferences that change in often unpredictable ways. The success of the Company’s business depends in large measure on working with the Beverage Companies to meet the changing preferences of the broad consumer market. Health and wellness trends throughout the marketplace have resulted in a shift from sugar sparkling beverages to diet sparkling beverages, tea, sports drinks, enhanced water and bottled water over the past several years. Failure to satisfy changing consumer preferences could adversely affect the profitability of the Company’s business. The Company’s sales can be impacted by the health and stability of the general economy. Unfavorable changes in general economic conditions, such as a recession or economic slowdown in the geographic markets in which the Company does business, may have the temporary effect of reducing the demand for certain of the Company’s products. For example, economic forces may cause consumers to shift away from purchasing higher-margin products and packages sold through immediate consumption and other highly profitable channels. Adverse economic conditions could also increase the likelihood of customer delinquencies and bankruptcies, which would increase the risk of uncollectibility of certain accounts. Each of these factors could adversely affect the Company’s revenue, price realization, gross margins and overall financial condition and operating results. Miscalculation of the Company’s need for infrastructure investment could impact the Company’s financial results. Projected requirements of the Company’s infrastructure investments may differ from actual levels if the Company’s volume growth is not as the Company anticipates. The Company’s infrastructure investments are generally long-term in nature; therefore, it is possible that investments made today may not generate the returns expected by the Company due to future changes in the marketplace. Significant changes from the Company’s expected returns on cold drink equipment, fleet, technology and supply chain infrastructure investments could adversely affect the Company’s consolidated financial results. The Company’s inability to meet requirements under its beverage agreements could result in the loss of distribution rights. Approximately 88% of the Company’s bottle/can volume to retail customers in 2012 consisted of products of The Coca-Cola Company, which is the sole supplier of these products or of the concentrates or syrups required to manufacture these products. The remaining 12% of the Company’s bottle/can volume to retail customers in 2012 consisted of products of other beverage companies and the Company’s own products. The Company must satisfy various requirements under its beverage agreements. Failure to satisfy these requirements could result in the loss of distribution rights for the respective products. 12 Material changes in, or the Company’s inability to satisfy, the performance requirements for marketing funding support, or decreases from historic levels of marketing funding support, could reduce the Company’s profitability. Material changes in the performance requirements, or decreases in the levels of marketing funding support historically provided, under marketing programs with The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies, or the Company’s inability to meet the performance requirements for the anticipated levels of such marketing funding support payments, could adversely affect the Company’s profitability. The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies are under no obligation to continue marketing funding support at historic levels. Changes in The Coca-Cola Company’s and other beverage companies’ levels of advertising, marketing spending and product innovation could reduce the Company’s sales volume. The Coca-Cola Company’s and other beverage companies’ levels of advertising, marketing spending and product innovation directly impact the Company’s operations. While the Company does not believe there will be significant changes in the levels of marketing and advertising by the Beverage Companies, there can be no assurance that historic levels will continue. The Company’s volume growth will also continue to be dependent on product innovation by the Beverage Companies, especially The Coca-Cola Company. Decreases in marketing, advertising and product innovation by the Beverage Companies could adversely impact the profitability of the Company. The inability of the Company’s aluminum can or plastic bottle suppliers to meet the Company’s purchase requirements could reduce the Company’s profitability. The Company currently obtains all of its aluminum cans from two domestic suppliers and all of its plastic bottles from two domestic cooperatives. The inability of these aluminum can or plastic bottle suppliers to meet the Company’s requirements for containers could result in short-term shortages until alternative sources of supply can be located. The Company attempts to mitigate these risks by working closely with key suppliers and by purchasing business interruption insurance where appropriate. Failure of the aluminum can or plastic bottle suppliers to meet the Company’s purchase requirements could reduce the Company’s profitability. The inability of the Company to offset higher raw material costs with higher selling prices, increased bottle/ can volume or reduced expenses could have an adverse impact on the Company’s profitability. Raw material costs, including the costs for plastic bottles, aluminum cans and high fructose corn syrup, have been subject to significant price volatility and have increased in recent years at faster rates than the general rate of inflation. In addition, there are no limits on the prices The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies can charge for concentrate. If the Company cannot offset higher raw material costs with higher selling prices, increased sales volume or reductions in other costs, the Company’s profitability could be adversely affected. The consolidation among suppliers of certain of the Company’s raw materials could have an adverse impact on the Company’s profitability. In recent years, there has been consolidation among suppliers of certain of the Company’s raw materials. The reduction in the number of competitive sources of supply could have an adverse effect upon the Company’s ability to negotiate the lowest costs and, in light of the Company’s relatively small in-plant raw material inventory levels, has the potential for causing interruptions in the Company’s supply of raw materials. The increasing reliance on purchased finished goods from external sources makes the Company subject to incremental risks that could have an adverse impact on the Company’s profitability. With the introduction of FUZE, Campbell and glacéau products into the Company’s portfolio during 2007 and Monster Energy products during 2008, the Company has become increasingly reliant on purchased finished goods from external sources versus the Company’s internal production. As a result, the Company is subject to limited to, product availability, price variability, product quality and incremental risk including, but not production capacity shortfalls for externally purchased finished goods. 13 Sustained increases in fuel prices or the inability of the Company to secure adequate supplies of fuel could have an adverse impact on the Company’s profitability. The Company uses significant amounts of fuel in the distribution of its products. International or domestic geopolitical or other events could impact the supply and cost of fuel and could impact the timely delivery of the Company’s products to its customers. While the Company is working to reduce fuel consumption and manage the Company’s fuel costs, there can be no assurance that the Company will succeed in limiting the impact on the Company’s business or future cost increases. The Company may use derivative instruments to hedge some or all of the Company’s projected diesel fuel and unleaded gasoline purchases. These derivative instruments relate to fuel used in the Company’s delivery fleet and other vehicles. Continued upward pressure in these costs could reduce the profitability of the Company’s operations. Sustained increases in workers’ compensation, employment practices and vehicle accident claims costs could reduce the Company’s profitability. The Company uses various insurance structures to manage its workers’ compensation, auto liability, medical and other insurable risks. These structures consist of retentions, deductibles, limits and a diverse group of insurers that serve to strategically transfer and mitigate the financial impact of losses. Losses are accrued using assumptions and procedures followed in the insurance industry, adjusted for company-specific history and expectations. Although the Company has actively sought to control increases in these costs, there can be no assurance that the Company will succeed in limiting future cost increases. Continued upward pressure in these costs could reduce the profitability of the Company’s operations. Sustained increases in the cost of employee benefits could reduce the Company’s profitability. The Company’s profitability is substantially affected by the cost of pension retirement benefits, postretirement medical benefits and current employees’ medical benefits. In recent years, the Company has experienced significant increases in these costs as a result of macro-economic factors beyond the Company’s control, including increases in health care costs, declines in investment returns on pension assets and changes in discount rates used to calculate pension and related liabilities. Although the Company has actively sought to control increases in these costs, there can be no assurance the Company will succeed in limiting future cost increases, and continued upward pressure in these costs could reduce the profitability of the Company’s operations. On March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) was signed into law. On March 30, 2010, a companion bill, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (“Reconciliation Act”), was also signed into law. The PPACA and the Reconciliation Act, when taken together, represent comprehensive health care reform legislation that will likely affect the cost associated with providing employer- sponsored medical plans. The Company is continuing to assess the impact this legislation will have on the Company’s employer-sponsored medical plans. Additionally, the PPACA and the Reconciliation Act include provisions that reduce the tax benefits available to employers that receive Medicare Part D subsidies. Product liability claims brought against the Company or product recalls could negatively affect the Company’s business, financial results and brand image. The Company may be liable if the consumption of the Company’s products causes injury or illness. The Company may also be required to recall products if they become contaminated or are damaged or mislabeled. A significant product liability or other product-related legal judgment against the Company or a widespread recall of the Company’s products could negatively impact the Company’s business, financial results and brand image. Cybersecurity risks - technology failures or cyberattacks on the Company’s systems could disrupt the Company’s operations and negatively impact the Company’s business. The Company increasingly relies on information technology systems to process, electronic information. For example, the Company’s production and distribution facilities, transmit and store inventory 14 management and driver handheld devices all utilize information technology to maximize efficiencies and minimize costs. Furthermore, a significant portion of the communication between personnel, customers and suppliers depends on information technology. Like most companies, the Company’s information technology systems may be vulnerable to interruption due to a variety of events beyond the Company’s control, including, but not limited to, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, hackers and other security issues. The Company has technology security initiatives and disaster recovery plans in place to mitigate the Company’s risk to these vulnerabilities, but these measures may not be adequate or implemented properly to ensure that the Company’s operations are not disrupted. Changes in interest rates could adversely affect the profitability of the Company. As of December 30, 2012, $50.0 million of the Company’s debt and capital lease obligations of $493.0 million were subject to changes in short-term interest rates. The Company’s $200 million revolving credit facility and $20 million uncommitted line of credit are subject to changes in short-term interest rates. On December 30, 2012, the Company had $30.0 million of outstanding borrowings on the $200 million revolving credit facility and $20.0 million of outstanding borrowing on the $20 million uncommitted line of credit. If interest rates increase in the future, it could increase the Company’s borrowing cost and it could reduce the Company’s overall profitability. The Company’s pension and postretirement medical benefits costs are subject to changes in interest rates. A decline in interest rates used to discount the Company’s pension and postretirement medical liabilities could increase the cost of these benefits and increase the overall liability. The level of the Company’s debt could restrict the Company’s operating flexibility and limit the Company’s ability to incur additional debt to fund future needs. As of December 30, 2012, the Company had $493.0 million of debt and capital lease obligations. The Company’s level of debt requires the Company to dedicate a substantial portion of the Company’s future cash flows from operations to the payment of principal and interest, thereby reducing the funds available to the Company for other purposes. The Company’s debt can negatively impact the Company’s operations by (1) limiting the Company’s ability and/or increasing the cost to obtain funding for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes; (2) increasing the Company’s vulnerability to economic downturns and adverse industry conditions by limiting the Company’s ability to react to changing economic and business conditions; and (3) exposing the Company to a risk that a significant decrease in cash flows from operations could make it difficult for the Company to meet the Company’s debt service requirements. Recent volatility in the financial markets may negatively impact the Company’s ability to access the credit markets. Capital and credit markets have become increasingly volatile as a result of adverse conditions that caused the failure and near failure of a number of large financial services companies. If the capital and credit markets continue to experience volatility, it is possible that the Company’s ability to access the credit markets may be limited by these factors at a time when the Company would like or need to do so. If the availability of funds is limited, the Company may incur increased costs associated with borrowing to meet the Company’s requirements. On September 21, 2011, the Company entered into a $200 million five-year unsecured revolving credit agreement (“$200 million facility”). This replaced the previous $200 million five-year unsecured revolving credit agreement which had been scheduled to mature in 2012. The $200 million facility has a scheduled maturity date of September 21, 2016. The Company repaid $150 million of Senior Notes which matured in 2012. The Company borrowed from its $200 million facility and its $20 million uncommitted line of credit and used cash flows generated by operations to fund the repayments. As of December 30, 2012, the Company had $170 million available on its $200 million facility. The limitation of availability of funds could have an impact on the Company’s ability to refinance maturing debt and/or react to changing economic and business conditions. 15 The Company’s credit rating could be negatively impacted by changes to The Coca-Cola Company’s credit rating. The Company’s credit rating could be significantly impacted by capital management activities of The Coca-Cola Company and/or changes in the credit rating of The Coca-Cola Company. A lower credit rating could significantly increase the Company’s interest costs or could have an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing at acceptable interest rates or to refinance existing debt. Changes in legal contingencies could adversely impact the Company’s future profitability. Changes from expectations for the resolution of outstanding legal claims and assessments could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s profitability and financial condition. In addition, the Company’s failure to abide by laws, orders or other legal commitments could subject the Company to fines, penalties or other damages. Legislative changes that affect the Company’s distribution, packaging and products could reduce demand for the Company’s products or increase the Company’s costs. The Company’s business model is dependent on the availability of the Company’s various products and packages in multiple channels and locations to better satisfy the needs of the Company’s customers and consumers. Laws that restrict the Company’s ability to distribute products in schools and other venues, as well as laws that require deposits for certain types of packages or those that limit the Company’s ability to design new packages or market certain packages, could negatively impact the financial results of the Company. In addition, excise or other taxes imposed on the sale of certain of the Company’s products by the federal government and certain state and local governments could cause consumers to shift away from purchasing products of the Company. If enacted, such taxes could materially affect the Company’s business and financial results, particularly if they were enacted in a form that incorporated them into the shelf prices for the Company’s products. Significant additional labeling or warning requirements may inhibit sales of affected products. Various jurisdictions may seek to adopt significant additional product labeling or warning requirements relating to the content or perceived adverse health consequences of certain of the Company’s products. If these types of requirements become applicable to one or more of the Company’s major products under current or future environmental or health laws or regulations, they may inhibit sales of such products. Additional taxes resulting from tax audits could adversely impact the Company’s future profitability. An assessment of additional taxes resulting from audits of the Company’s tax filings could have an adverse impact on the Company’s profitability, cash flows and financial condition. Natural disasters and unfavorable weather could negatively impact the Company’s future profitability. Natural disasters or unfavorable weather conditions in the geographic regions in which the Company does business could have an adverse impact on the Company’s revenue and profitability. For example, prolonged drought conditions in the geographic regions in which the Company does business could lead to restrictions on the use of water, which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to manufacture and distribute products and the Company’s cost to do so. Global climate change or legal, regulatory, or market responses to such change could adversely impact the Company’s future profitability. The growing political and scientific sentiment is that increased concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are influencing global weather patterns. Changing weather patterns, along 16 with the increased frequency or duration of extreme weather conditions, could impact the availability or increase the cost of key raw materials that the Company uses to produce its products. In addition, the sale of these products can be impacted by weather conditions. Concern over climate change, including global warming, has led to legislative and regulatory initiatives directed at limiting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. For example, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) began imposing GHG regulations on utilities, refineries and major manufacturers in 2011. Although the immediate effect was minor, as such regulations apply only to those that are planning to build large new facilities or materially modify existing ones, over the next decade the USEPA plan to extend the scope of the GHG regulations to cover virtually all sources of GHG’s. Those USEPA regulations or future laws enacted or regulations adopted that directly or indirectly affect the Company’s production, distribution, packaging, cost of raw materials, fuel, ingredients and water could all impact the Company’s business and financial results. Issues surrounding labor relations could adversely impact the Company’s future profitability and/or its operating efficiency. Approximately 7% of the Company’s employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. The inability to renegotiate subsequent agreements on satisfactory terms and conditions could result in work interruptions or stoppages, which could have a material impact on the profitability of the Company. Also, the terms and conditions of existing or renegotiated agreements could increase costs, or otherwise affect the Company’s ability to fully implement operational changes to improve overall efficiency. One collective bargaining agreement covering approximately .4% of the Company’s employees expired during 2012 and the Company entered into a new agreement in 2012. Two collective bargaining agreements covering approximately .7% of the Company’s employees will expire during 2013. The Company’s ability to change distribution methods and business practices could be negatively affected by United States Coca-Cola bottler system disputes. Litigation filed by some United States bottlers of Coca-Cola products indicates that disagreements may exist within the Coca-Cola bottler system concerning distribution methods and business practices. Although the litigation has been resolved, disagreements among various Coca-Cola bottlers could adversely affect the Company’s ability to fully implement its business plans in the future. Management’s use of estimates and assumptions could have a material effect on reported results. The Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements include estimates and assumptions by management that impact reported amounts. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. Changes in accounting standards could affect the Company’s reported financial results. New accounting standards or pronouncements that may become applicable to the Company from time to time, or changes in the interpretation of existing standards and pronouncements could have a significant effect on the Company’s reported results for the affected periods. Obesity and other health concerns may reduce demand for some of the Company’s products. Consumers, public health officials, public health advocates and government officials are becoming increasingly concerned about the public health consequences associated with obesity, particularly among young people. In February 2013, a group of public health officials and health advocates submitted a petition to the FDA requesting that agency to regulate the amount of caloric sweeteners in sparkling and other beverages. The FDA has not responded to the petition. In addition, some researchers, health advocates and dietary guidelines are encouraging consumers to reduce the consumption of sugar, including sugar sparkling beverages. Increasing public concern about these issues; possible new taxes and governmental regulations concerning the production, marketing, labeling or availability of the Company’s beverages; and negative publicity resulting from actual or threatened legal actions against the Company or other companies in the same industry relating to the marketing, 17 labeling or sale of sugar sparkling beverages may reduce demand for these beverages, which could adversely affect the Company’s profitability. The Company has experienced public policy challenges regarding the sale of soft drinks in schools, particularly elementary, middle and high schools. A number of states have regulations restricting the sale of soft drinks and other foods in schools. Many of these restrictions have existed for several years in connection with subsidized meal programs in schools. The focus has more recently turned to the growing health, nutrition and obesity concerns of today’s youth. The impact of restrictive legislation, if widely enacted, could have an adverse impact on the Company’s products, image and reputation. The concentration of the Company’s capital stock ownership with the Harrison family limits other stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters. Members of the Harrison family, including the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, J. Frank Harrison, III, beneficially own shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock representing approximately 85% of the total voting power of the Company’s outstanding capital stock. In addition, three members of the Harrison family, including Mr. Harrison, III, serve on the Board of Directors of the Company. As a result, members of the Harrison family have the ability to exert substantial influence or actual control over the Company’s management and affairs and over substantially all matters requiring action by the Company’s stockholders. Additionally, as a result of the Harrison family’s significant beneficial ownership of the Company’s outstanding voting stock, the Company has relied on the “controlled company” exemption from certain corporate governance requirements of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control otherwise favored by the Company’s other stockholders and could depress the stock price. It also limits other stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters and, as a result, the Company may take actions that the Company’s other stockholders may not view as beneficial. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 2. Properties The principal properties of the Company include its corporate headquarters, four production/distribution facilities and 41 sales distribution centers. The Company owns two production/distribution facilities and 33 sales two production/distribution facilities, 8 sales distribution centers, and leases its corporate headquarters, distribution centers and 3 additional storage warehouses. The Company leases its 110,000 square foot corporate headquarters and a 65,000 square foot adjacent office building from a related party. The lease has a fifteen-year term and expires in December 2021. Rental payments for these facilities were $4.0 million in 2012. The Company leases its 542,000 square foot Snyder Production Center and an adjacent 105,000 square foot distribution center in Charlotte, North Carolina from a related party pursuant to a lease with a ten-year term which expires in December 2020. Rental payments under this lease totaled $3.5 million in 2012. The Company leases its 330,000 square foot production/distribution facility in Nashville, Tennessee. The lease requires monthly payments through December 2014. Rental payments under this lease totaled $.5 million in 2012. The Company leases a 278,000 square foot warehouse which serves as additional space for its Charlotte, North Carolina distribution center. The lease requires monthly payments through July 2022. Rental payments under this lease totaled $.7 million in 2012. The Company leases a 220,000 square foot sales distribution center in Lavergne, Tennessee. In the first quarter of 2011, a new lease replaced the existing lease. The new lease requires monthly payments through 2026, but did not require rental payments for the first eleven months of the lease. Rental payments under the lease were $.6 million in 2012. 18 The Company leases its 50,000 square foot sales distribution center in Charleston, South Carolina. The Company amended the lease in the first quarter of 2012. The amended lease requires monthly payments through February 2027. Rental payments under this lease totaled $.3 million in 2012. The Company leases its 57,000 square foot sales distribution center in Greenville, South Carolina. The lease requires monthly payments through July 2018. Rental payments under this lease totaled $.7 million in 2012. The Company leases a 75,000 square foot warehouse which serves as additional space for the Company’s Roanoke, Virginia distribution center. The Company signed a lease extension in 2012, effective in 2013, to increase the space by 36,000 square feet to a total of 111,000 square feet. The extended lease requires payments through the first quarter of 2025. Rental payments under this lease totaled $.3 million in 2012. The Company leases a 233,000 square foot sales distribution center in Clayton, North Carolina. This lease requires monthly lease payments through March 2026. Rental payments under this lease totaled $1.0 million in 2012. The Company owns and operates a 316,000 square foot production/distribution facility in Roanoke, Virginia and a 271,000 square foot production/distribution facility in Mobile, Alabama. The approximate percentage utilization of the Company’s production facilities is indicated below: Production Facilities Location Charlotte, North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mobile, Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nashville, Tennessee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Roanoke, Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Percentage Utilization * 71% 56% 80% 69% * Estimated 2013 production divided by capacity (based on operations of 6 days per week and 20 hours per day). The Company currently has sufficient production capacity to meet its operational requirements. In addition to the production facilities noted above, the Company utilizes a portion of the production capacity at SAC, a cooperative located in Bishopville, South Carolina, that owns a 261,000 square foot production facility. The Company’s products are generally transported to sales distribution facilities for storage pending sale. The number of sales distribution facilities by market area as of January 31, 2013 was as follows: Sales Distribution Facilities Region Number of Facilities North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . South Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . South Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Middle Tennessee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Western Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . West Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6 4 4 3 4 8 41 The Company’s facilities are all in good condition and are adequate for the Company’s operations as presently conducted. 19 The Company also operates approximately 1,900 vehicles in the sale and distribution of the Company’s beverage products, of which approximately 1,200 are route delivery trucks. In addition, the Company owns approximately 187,000 beverage dispensing and vending machines for the sale of the Company’s products in the Company’s bottling territories. Item 3. Legal Proceedings The Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings which have arisen in the ordinary course of its business. Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of these claims and legal proceedings, management believes that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, cash flows or results of operations of the Company. No material amount of loss in excess of recorded amounts is believed to be reasonably possible as a result of these claims and legal proceedings. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. Executive Officers of the Company The following is a list of names and ages of all the executive officers of the Company indicating all positions and offices with the Company held by each such person. All officers have served in their present capacities for the past five years except as otherwise stated. J. FRANK HARRISON, III, age 58, is Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Harrison, III was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors in December 1996. Mr. Harrison, III served as Vice Chairman from November 1987 through December 1996 and was appointed as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer in May 1994. He was first employed by the Company in 1977 and has served as a Division Sales Manager and as a Vice President. HENRY W. FLINT, age 58, is President and Chief Operating Officer, a position he has held since August 2012. Previously, he was Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, a position he held since April 2007. Previously, he was Executive Vice President and Assistant to the Chairman of the Company, a position to which he was appointed in July 2004. Prior to that, he was a Managing Partner at the law firm of Kennedy Covington Lobdell & Hickman, L.L.P. with which he was associated from 1980 to 2004. WILLIAM B. ELMORE, age 57, is Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, a position he has held since August 2012. Previously, he was President and Chief Operating Officer and a Director of the Company, positions he has held since January 2001. Previously, he was Vice President, Value Chain from July 1999 and Vice President, Business Systems from August 1998 to June 1999. He was Vice President, Treasurer from June 1996 to July 1998. He was Vice President, Regional Manager for the Virginia Division, West Virginia Division and Tennessee Division from August 1991 to May 1996. WILLIAM J. BILLIARD, age 46, is Vice President, Operations Finance and Chief Accounting Officer. He was named Vice President of Operations Finance on November 1, 2010 and was appointed Chief Accounting Officer on February 20, 2006. Previously, he was also Vice President and Corporate Controller of the Company and was first employed by the Company on February 20, 2006. Before joining the Company, he was Senior Vice President, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller of Portrait Corporation of America, Inc., a portrait photography studio company, from September 2005 to January 2006 and Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller from August 2001 to September 2005. Prior to that, he served as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Tailored Management, a long-term staffing company, from August 2000 to August 2001. Portrait Corporation of America, Inc. filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in August 2006. ROBERT G. CHAMBLESS, age 47, is Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing, a position he has held since August 2010. Previously, he was Senior Vice President, Sales, a position he held since June 2008. He held the position of Vice President—Franchise Sales from early 2003 to June 2008 and Region Sales Manager 20 for our Southern Division between 2000 and 2003. He was Sales Manager in the Company’s Columbia, South Carolina branch between 1997 and 2000. He has served the Company in several other positions prior to this position and was first employed by the Company in 1986. CLIFFORD M. DEAL, III, age 51, is Vice President and Treasurer, a position he has held since June 1999. Previously, he was Director of Compensation and Benefits from October 1997 to May 1999. He was Corporate Benefits Manager from December 1995 to September 1997 and was Manager of Tax Accounting from November 1993 to November 1995. NORMAN C. GEORGE, age 57, is President, BYB Brands, Inc, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that distributes and markets Tum-E Yummies and other products developed by the Company, a position he has held since July 2006. Prior to that he was Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing and Customer Officer, a position he was appointed to in September 2001. Prior to that, he was Vice President, Marketing and National Sales, a position he was appointed to in December 1999. Prior to that, he was Vice President, Corporate Sales, a position he had held since August 1998. Previously, he was Vice President, Sales for the Carolinas South Region, a position he held beginning in November 1991. JAMES E. HARRIS, age 50, is Senior Vice President, Shared Services and Chief Financial Officer, a position he has held since January 28, 2008. He served as a Director of the Company from August 2003 until January 25, 2008 and was a member of the Audit Committee and the Finance Committee. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of MedCath Corporation, an operator of cardiovascular hospitals, from December 1999 to January 2008. From 1998 to 1999, he was Chief Financial Officer of Fresh Foods, Inc., a manufacturer of fully cooked food products. From 1987 to 1998, he served in several different officer positions with The Shelton Companies, Inc. He also served two years with Ernst & Young LLP as a senior accountant. DAVID L. HOPKINS, age 53, is Senior Vice President, Operations. He was named Senior Vice President of Operations in May 2011. Prior to that, he was Vice President of Logistics from 2003 to 2011 and Vice President of Operations from 1994 to 2003. He served as Vice President of Manufacturing from 1990 to 1994. His career with the Company began in 1988 as the Roanoke Plant Manager. UMESH M. KASBEKAR, age 55, is Senior Vice President, Planning and Administration, a position he has held since January 1995. Prior to that, he was Vice President, Planning, a position he was appointed to in December 1988. DAVID M. KATZ, age 44, is Senior Vice President, Assistant to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since January 2013. Previously, he was Senior Vice President Midwest Region for Coca-Cola Refreshments (“CCR”) a position he began in 2011. Prior to the formation of CCR, he was Vice President, Sales Operations for Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.’s (“CCE”) East Business Unit in 2010. In 2008 he was promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer of Coca-Cola Bottlers’ Sales and Services Company, LLC. He began his Coca-Cola career in 1993 with CCE as a Logistics Consultant. LAUREN C. STEELE, age 58, is Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs, a position to which he was appointed in March 2012. Prior to that he was Vice President of Corporate Affairs, a position he has held since May 1989. He is responsible for governmental, media and community relations for the Company. MICHAEL A. STRONG, age 59, is Senior Vice President, Human Resources, a position to which he was appointed in March 2011. Previously, he was Vice President of Human Resources, a position to which he was appointed in December 2009. He was Region Sales Manager for the North Carolina West Region from December 2006 to November 2009. Prior to that, he served as Division Sales Manager and General Manager as well as other key sales related positions. He joined the Company in 1985 when the Company acquired Coca-Cola Bottling Company in Mobile, Alabama, where he began his career. 21 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities The Company has two classes of common stock outstanding, Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. The Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol COKE. The table below sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low reported sales prices per share of Common Stock. There is no established public trading market for the Class B Common Stock. Shares of Class B Common Stock are convertible on a share-for-share basis into shares of Common Stock. Fiscal Year 2012 2011 High Low High Low First quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $65.27 64.89 69.15 70.93 $56.51 60.05 63.88 61.07 $67.38 76.32 69.92 59.81 $52.80 64.97 53.50 50.26 A quarterly dividend rate of $.25 per share on both Common Stock and Class B Common Stock was maintained throughout 2011 and 2012. Shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock have participated equally in dividends since 1994. Pursuant to the Company’s certificate of incorporation, no cash dividend or dividend of property or stock other than stock of the Company, as specifically described in the certificate of incorporation, may be declared and paid on the Class B Common Stock unless an equal or greater dividend is declared and paid on the Common Stock. The amount and frequency of future dividends will be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors in light of the earnings and financial condition of the Company at such time, and no assurance can be given that dividends will be declared or paid in the future. The number of stockholders of record of the Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, as of March 1, 2013, was 2,842 and 10, respectively. On March 6, 2012, the Compensation Committee determined that 40,000 shares of restricted Class B Common Stock, $1.00 par value, should be issued (pursuant to a Performance Unit Award Agreement approved in 2008) to J. Frank Harrison, III, in connection with his services in 2011 as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. As permitted under the terms of the Performance Unit Award Agreement, 17,680 of such shares were settled in cash to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of the performance units. On March 5, 2013, the Compensation Committee determined that 40,000 shares of restricted Class B Common Stock, $1.00 par value, should be issued (pursuant to a Performance Unit Award Agreement approved in 2008) to J. Frank Harrison, III, in connection with his services in 2012 as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. As permitted under the terms of the Performance Unit Award Agreement, 19,880 of such shares were settled in cash to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of the performance units. The shares issued to Mr. Harrison, III were issued without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. Presented below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total return on the Company’s Common Stock to the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and a peer group for the period commencing December 30, 2007 and ending December 30, 2012. The peer group is comprised of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., The Coca-Cola Company, Cott Corporation, National Beverage Corp., and PepsiCo, Inc. 22 The graph assumes that $100 was invested in the Company’s Common Stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the peer group on December 30, 2007 and that all dividends were reinvested on a quarterly basis. Returns for the companies included in the peer group have been weighted on the basis of the total market capitalization for each company. COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, the S&P 500 Index, and a Peer Group $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 12/30/07 12/28/08 1/3/10 1/2/11 1/1/12 12/30/12 CCBCC S&P 500 Peer Group CCBCC S&P 500 Peer Group 12/30/07 12/28/08 1/3/10 $100 $100 $100 $77 $63 $73 $95 $80 $92 1/2/11 $100 $ 92 $107 1/1/12 $107 $ 94 $115 12/30/12 $121 $109 $122 23 Item 6. Selected Financial Data The following table sets forth certain selected financial data concerning the Company for the five years ended December 30, 2012. The data for the five years ended December 30, 2012 is derived from audited consolidated financial statements of the Company. This information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” set forth in Item 7 hereof and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the more detailed consolidated financial statements and notes contained in Item 8 hereof. This information should also be read in conjunction with the “Risk Factors” set forth in Item 1A. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA* Fiscal Year** In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Summary of Operations Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,614,433 $1,561,239 $1,514,599 $1,442,986 $1,463,615 848,409 Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, delivery and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . 555,728 1,404,137 Total costs and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59,478 Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,601 Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,877 Income before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,394 Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,483 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 960,124 565,623 1,525,747 88,686 35,338 53,348 21,889 31,459 931,996 541,713 1,473,709 87,530 35,979 51,551 19,528 32,023 873,783 544,498 1,418,281 96,318 35,127 61,191 21,649 39,542 822,992 525,491 1,348,483 94,503 37,379 57,124 16,581 40,543 Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,242 3,415 3,485 2,407 2,392 Net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 27,217 $ 28,608 $ 36,057 $ 38,136 $ 9,091 Basic net income per share based on net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Diluted net income per share based on net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Cash dividends per share: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Other Information Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — assuming dilution: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 3.11 $ 3.11 $ 3.93 $ 3.93 $ 4.16 $ 4.16 $ 2.94 $ 2.92 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 3.09 $ 3.08 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 3.91 $ 3.90 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 4.15 $ 4.13 $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ 7,141 2,085 9,266 2,125 7,141 2,063 9,244 2,103 7,141 2,040 9,221 2,080 7,072 2,092 9,197 2,125 .99 .99 .99 .99 1.00 1.00 6,644 2,500 9,160 2,516 Year-End Financial Position Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,283,474 $1,362,425 $1,307,622 $1,283,077 $1,315,772 176,693 Current portion of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,781 Current portion of obligations under capital leases . . . . . . . 74,833 Obligations under capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414,757 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt 74,478 Total equity of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated . . . . . — 3,866 55,395 523,063 126,064 — 3,846 59,261 537,917 114,460 120,000 4,574 69,480 403,219 129,470 20,000 5,230 64,351 403,386 135,259 * See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information. ** All years presented are 52-week fiscal years except 2009 which was a 53-week year. The estimated net sales, gross margin and selling, delivery and administrative expenses for the additional selling week in 2009 of approximately $18 million, $6 million and $4 million, respectively, are included in reported results for 2009. 24 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements During the fourth quarter of 2012, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (“the Company”) identified an error in the treatment of a certain prior year deferred tax asset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This resulted in an understatement of the net noncurrent deferred income tax liability and an overstatement of retained earnings, and therefore equity, for each of the impacted periods. This error affected the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity as presented in each of the quarters of 2012, 2011 and 2010, including the year-end consolidated financial statements for 2011 and 2010. The Company has revised prior period financial statements to correct this immaterial error. Refer to Note 1 Significant Accounting Policies — Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements for further details. This revision did not affect the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for any of these periods. The discussion and analysis included herein is based on the financial results (and revised Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity) for the years ended December 30, 2012, January 1, 2012 and January 2, 2011. The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“M,D&A”) of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (the “Company”) should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. M,D&A includes the following sections: • Our Business and the Nonalcoholic Beverage Industry — a general description of the Company’s business and the nonalcoholic beverage industry. • Areas of Emphasis — a summary of the Company’s key priorities. • Overview of Operations and Financial Condition — a summary of key information and trends concerning the financial results for the three years ended 2012. • Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements — a discussion of accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and that require critical judgments and estimates and the expected impact of new accounting pronouncements. • Results of Operations — an analysis of the Company’s results of operations for the three years presented in the consolidated financial statements. • Financial Condition — an analysis of the Company’s financial condition as of the end of the last two years as presented in the consolidated financial statements. • Liquidity and Capital Resources — an analysis of capital resources, cash sources and uses, investing activities, financing activities, off-balance sheet arrangements, aggregate contractual obligations and hedging activities. • Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements. The fiscal years presented are the 52-week periods ended December 30, 2012 (“2012”), January 1, 2012 (“2011”) and January 2, 2011 (“2010”). The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to December 31 of each year. The consolidated financial statements include the consolidated operations of the Company and its majority- owned subsidiaries including Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership (“Piedmont”). Noncontrolling interest primarily consists of The Coca-Cola Company’s interest in Piedmont, which was 22.7% for all periods presented. Piedmont is the Company’s only significant subsidiary that has a noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest income of $4.2 million in 2012, $3.4 million in 2011 and $3.5 million in 2010 are included in net income on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to both the Company and noncontrolling interest are shown on the Company’s consolidated 25 totaled $64.2 million and statements of operations. Noncontrolling interest primarily related to Piedmont $59.9 million at December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. These amounts are shown as noncontrolling interest in the equity section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. During May 2010, Nashville, Tennessee experienced a severe rain storm which caused extensive flood damage in the area. The Company has a production/sales distribution facility located in the flooded area. Due to damage incurred during this flood, the Company recorded a loss of $.2 million on uninsured cold drink equipment. This loss was offset by gains of $1.1 million for the excess of insurance proceeds received over the net book value of production equipment damaged as a result of the flood. In 2010, the Company received $7.1 million in insurance proceeds related to losses from the flood. Our Business and the Nonalcoholic Beverage Industry The Company produces, markets and distributes nonalcoholic beverages, primarily products of The Coca-Cola Company, which include some of the most recognized and popular beverage brands in the world. The Company is the largest independent bottler of products of The Coca-Cola Company in the United States, distributing these products in eleven states primarily in the Southeast. The Company also distributes several other beverage brands. These product offerings include both sparkling and still beverages. Sparkling beverages are carbonated beverages, including energy products. Still beverages are noncarbonated beverages such as bottled water, tea, ready-to-drink coffee, enhanced water, juices and sports drinks. The Company had net sales of $1.6 billion in 2012. The nonalcoholic beverage market is highly competitive. The Company’s competitors include bottlers and distributors of nationally and regionally advertised and marketed products and private label products. In each region in which the Company operates, between 85% and 95% of sparkling beverage sales in bottles, cans and other containers are accounted for by the Company and its principal competitors, which in each region includes the local bottler of Pepsi-Cola and, in some regions, the local bottler of Dr Pepper, Royal Crown and/or 7-Up products. The sparkling beverage category (including energy products) represents 82% of the Company’s 2012 bottle/can net sales. The principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage industry are point-of-sale merchandising, new product introductions, new vending and dispensing equipment, packaging changes, pricing, price promotions, product quality, retail space management, customer service, frequency of distribution and advertising. The Company believes it is competitive in its territories with respect to each of these methods. The Coca-Cola Company acquired Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. (“CCE”) on October 2, 2010. In connection with the transaction, CCE changed its name to Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. (“CCR”) and transferred its beverage operations outside of North America to an independent third party. As a result of the transaction, the North American operations of CCE are now included in CCR. In M,D&A, references to “CCR” refer to CCR and CCE as it existed prior to the acquisition by The Coca-Cola Company. The Coca-Cola Company had a significant equity interest in CCE prior to the acquisition. The Company’s net sales in the last three fiscal years by product category were as follows: In Thousands Bottle/can sales: Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Sparkling beverages (including energy products) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Still beverages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,073,071 233,895 $1,052,164 219,628 $1,031,423 213,570 Total bottle/can sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,306,966 1,271,792 1,244,993 Other sales: Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Post-mix and other Total other sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152,401 155,066 307,467 150,274 139,173 289,447 140,807 128,799 269,606 Total net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,614,433 $1,561,239 $1,514,599 26 Areas of Emphasis Key priorities for the Company include revenue management, product innovation and beverage portfolio expansion, distribution cost management, and productivity. Revenue Management Revenue management requires a strategy which reflects consideration for pricing of brands and packages within product categories and channels, highly effective working relationships with customers and disciplined fact-based decision-making. Revenue management has been and continues to be a key driver which has a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations. Product Innovation and Beverage Portfolio Expansion Innovation of both new brands and packages has been and will continue to be critical to the Company’s overall revenue. New packaging introductions include the 1.25-liter bottle in 2011, 7.5-ounce sleek can in 2010 and the 2-liter contour bottle for Coca-Cola products during 2009. The Company has invested in its own brand portfolio with products such as Tum-E Yummies, a vitamin C enhanced flavored drink, Country Breeze tea and Fuel in a Bottle power shots. These brands enable the Company to participate in strong growth categories and capitalize on distribution channels that include the Company’s traditional Coca-Cola franchise territory as well as third party distributors outside the Company’s traditional Coca-Cola franchise territory. While the growth prospects of Company-owned or exclusively licensed brands appear promising, the cost of developing, marketing and distributing these brands is anticipated to be significant as well. Distribution Cost Management Distribution costs represent the costs of transporting finished goods from Company locations to customer outlets. Total distribution costs amounted to $200.0 million, $191.9 million and $187.2 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Over the past several years, the Company has focused on converting its distribution system from a conventional routing system to a predictive system. This conversion to a predictive system has allowed the Company to more efficiently handle increasing numbers of products. In addition, the Company has closed a number of smaller sales distribution centers reducing its fixed warehouse-related costs. The Company has three primary delivery systems for its current business: • bulk delivery for large supermarkets, mass merchandisers and club stores; • advanced sale delivery for convenience stores, drug stores, small supermarkets and on-premises accounts; and • full service delivery for its full service vending customers. Distribution cost management will continue to be a key area of emphasis for the Company. Productivity A key driver in the Company’s selling, delivery and administrative (“S,D&A”) expense management relates to ongoing improvements in labor productivity and asset productivity. Overview of Operations and Financial Condition The following items affect the comparability of the financial results presented below: 2012 • a $.5 million pre-tax favorable mark-to-market adjustment to cost of sales related to the Company’s 2013 commodity hedging program; and • a $1.5 million debit to income tax expense to increase the valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets of the Company. 27 2011 • a $6.7 million pre-tax unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment to cost of sales related to the Company’s 2011 commodity hedging program; • a $.2 million pre-tax unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the Company’s 2011 commodity hedging program; and • a $.9 million credit to income tax expense related to the reduction of the liability for uncertain tax positions in 2011 due mainly to the expiration of applicable statute of limitations. 2010 • a $3.8 million pre-tax unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment to cost of sales related to the Company’s 2010 and 2011 commodity hedging program; • a $.9 million pre-tax favorable adjustment to cost of sales related to the gain on the replacement of flood damaged production equipment; • a $1.4 million pre-tax unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the Company’s 2010 commodity hedging program; • a $3.7 million pre-tax unfavorable adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the impairment/accelerated depreciation of property, plant and equipment; • a $.5 million unfavorable adjustment to income tax expense related to the elimination of the deduction related to the Medicare Part D subsidy; and • a $1.7 million credit to income tax expense related to the reduction of the liability for uncertain tax positions in 2010 due mainly to the expiration of applicable statute of limitations. The following overview is a summary of key information concerning the Company’s financial results for 2012 compared to 2011 and 2010. In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S,D&A expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to the Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic net income per share: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted net income per share: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 $1,614,433 960,124 654,309 565,623 88,686 35,338 53,348 21,889 31,459 27,217 Fiscal Year 2011 $1,561,239 931,996 629,243 541,713 87,530 35,979 51,551 19,528 32,023 28,608 2010 $1,514,599 873,783 640,816 544,498 96,318 35,127 61,191 21,649 39,542 36,057 $ $ $ $ 2.95 2.95 2.94 2.92 $ $ $ $ 3.11 3.11 3.09 3.08 $ $ $ $ 3.93 3.93 3.91 3.90 The Company’s net sales grew 6.6% from 2010 to 2012. The net sales increase was primarily due to an increase in bottle/can sales price per unit and in bottle/can volume. Bottle/can sales price per unit increased 3.6% primarily due to a per unit increase in sparkling beverages except energy products. Bottle/can volume increased by 1.3% primarily due to a 15.7% increase in still beverages partially offset by a 1.2% decrease in sparkling beverages. 28 Gross margin dollars increased 2.1% from 2010 to 2012. The Company’s gross margin as a percentage of net sales decreased from 42.3% in 2010 to 40.5% in 2012. The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily due to increases in raw material costs partially offset by an increase in bottle/can sales prices. The following inputs represent a substantial portion of the Company’s total cost of goods sold: (1) sweeteners, (2) packaging materials, including plastic bottles and aluminum cans, and (3) finished products purchased from other vendors. The Company anticipates that the cost of some of the underlying commodities related to these inputs, particularly corn, will continue to face upward pressure and gross margins on all categories of products will be lower throughout 2013 compared to 2012 due to the impact of these rising commodity costs unless they can be offset by price increases. S,D&A expenses increased 3.9% from 2010 to 2012. The increase in S,D&A expenses was primarily the result of an increase in employee salaries including bonuses and incentives (salary increases and additional personnel), an increase in software amortization, an increase in professional fees, an increase in marketing expense, an increase in employer payroll taxes and an increase in depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment primarily due to increased purchases of refurbished vending machines with shorter lives, capitalization of software projects and the addition of two capital leases entered into the first quarter of 2011. Employee benefits expense also increased from 2010 to 2012 primarily due to increased medical insurance expense (both active and retired employees) partially offset by a decrease in pension expense. The increase in S,D&A expenses was partially offset by a decrease in property and casualty insurance expense. During 2010, an impairment expense/accelerated depreciation expense of $3.6 million was recorded. Net interest expense was unchanged in 2012 compared to 2010. The Company’s overall weighted average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations increased to 6.1% during 2012 from 5.9% during 2010. Income tax expense increased 1.1% from 2010 to 2012. The small percentage increase was primarily due to higher adjustments related to the liability for uncertain tax positions and for valuation allowances partially offset by lower pretax income. The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes, was 41.0% for 2012 compared to 35.4% for 2010. The effective tax rates differ from statutory rates as a result of adjustments to the liability for uncertain tax positions, adjustments to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance and permanent items. The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, was 44.6% for 2012 compared to 37.5% for 2010. Net debt and capital lease obligations at fiscal year ends were as follows: In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Jan. 2, 2011 Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $423,386 69,581 $523,219 74,054 $523,063 59,261 Total debt and capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . 492,967 10,399 597,273 93,758 582,324 49,372 Total net debt and capital lease obligations (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $482,568 $503,515 $532,952 (1) The non-GAAP measure “Total net debt and capital lease obligations” is used to provide investors with additional information which management believes is helpful in evaluating the Company’s capital structure and financial leverage. This non-GAAP financial information is not presented elsewhere in this report and may not be comparable to the similarly titled measures used by other companies. Additionally, this information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of its consolidated financial 29 statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The Company believes the following discussion addresses the Company’s most critical accounting policies, which are those most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company did not make changes in any critical accounting policies during 2012. Any changes in critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company during the quarter in which a change is contemplated and prior to making such change. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The Company evaluates the collectibility of its trade accounts receivable based on a number of factors. In circumstances where the Company becomes aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to the Company, a specific reserve for bad debts is estimated and recorded which reduces the recognized receivable to the estimated amount the Company believes will ultimately be collected. In addition to specific customer identification of potential bad debts, bad debt charges are recorded based on the Company’s recent past loss history and an overall assessment of past due trade accounts receivable outstanding. The Company’s review of potential bad debts considers the specific industry in which a particular customer operates, such as supermarket retailers, convenience stores and mass merchandise retailers, and the general economic conditions that currently exist in that specific industry. The Company then considers the effects of concentration of credit risk in a specific industry and for specific customers within that industry. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of such assets. Changes in circumstances such as technological advances, changes to the Company’s business model or changes in the Company’s capital spending strategy could result in the actual useful lives differing from the Company’s current estimates. Factors such as changes in the planned use of manufacturing equipment, cold drink dispensing equipment, transportation equipment, warehouse facilities or software could also result in shortened useful lives. In those cases where the Company determines that the useful life of property, plant and equipment should be shortened or lengthened, the Company depreciates the net book value in excess of the estimated salvage value over its revised remaining useful life. The Company evaluates the recoverability of the carrying amount of its property, plant and equipment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. These evaluations are performed at a level where independent cash flows may be attributed to either an asset or an asset group. If the Company determines that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group is not recoverable based upon the expected undiscounted future cash flows of the asset or asset group, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the excess of the carrying amounts over the estimated fair value of the long-lived assets. During 2012, the Company performed a review of property, plant and equipment. As a result of this review, $.3 million was recorded to impairment expense for manufacturing equipment. During 2011, the Company performed a review of property, plant and equipment and determined there was no impairment to be recorded. During 2010, the Company performed a review of property, plant and equipment. As a result of this review, $.9 million was recorded to impairment expense for five Company-owned sales distribution centers held-for-sale. The Company also recorded accelerated depreciation of $.5 million for certain other property, plant and equipment which was replaced in the first quarter of 2011. During 2010, the Company also determined the warehouse operations in Sumter, South Carolina would be relocated to other facilities and recorded impairment and accelerated depreciation of $2.2 million for the value of equipment and real estate related to the Sumter, South Carolina property. 30 Franchise Rights The Company considers franchise rights with The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies to be indefinite lived because the agreements are perpetual or, when not perpetual, the Company anticipates the agreements will continue to be renewed upon expiration. The cost of renewals is minimal, and the Company has not had any renewals denied. The Company considers franchise rights as indefinite lived intangible assets and, therefore, does not amortize the value of such assets. Instead, franchise rights are tested at least annually for impairment. Impairment Testing of Franchise Rights and Goodwill Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires testing of intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill for impairment at least annually. The Company conducts its annual impairment test as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. The Company also reviews intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill for impairment in impairment. For both franchise rights and goodwill, when appropriate, the Company performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the franchise rights or goodwill is below its carrying value. if there are significant changes in business conditions that could result When a quantitative analysis is considered necessary for the annual impairment analysis of franchise rights, the Company utilizes the Greenfield Method to estimate the fair value. The Greenfield Method assumes the Company is starting new, owning only franchise rights, and makes investments required to build an operation comparable to the Company’s current operations. The Company estimates the cash flows required to build a comparable operation and the available future cash flows from these operations. The cash flows are then discounted using an appropriate discount rate. The estimated fair value based upon the discounted cash flows is then compared to the carrying value on an aggregated basis. After completing these analyses, there was no impairment of the Company’s recorded franchise rights in 2012, 2011 or 2010. In addition to the discount rate, the estimated fair value includes a number of assumptions such as cost of investment to build a comparable operation, projected net sales, cost of sales, operating expenses and income taxes. Changes in the assumptions required to estimate the present value of the cash flows attributable to franchise rights could materially impact the fair value estimate. The Company has determined that it has one reporting unit for purposes of assessing goodwill for potential impairment. When a quantitative analysis is considered necessary for the annual impairment analysis of goodwill, the Company develops an estimated fair value for the reporting unit considering three different approaches: • market value, using the Company’s stock price plus outstanding debt; • discounted cash flow analysis; and • multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization based upon relevant industry data. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit is then compared to its carrying amount including goodwill. If the estimated fair value exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill will be considered not to be impaired and the second step of the GAAP impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount including goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value, the second step of the impairment test is performed to measure the amount of the impairment, if any. In the second step, a comparison is made between book value of goodwill to the implied fair value of goodwill. Implied fair value of goodwill is determined by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to the book value of its net identifiable assets excluding goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is below the book value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized for the difference. Based on these analyses, there was no impairment of the Company’s recorded goodwill in 2012, 2011 or 2010. The Company does not believe that the reporting unit is at risk of impairment in the future. The discounted cash flow analysis includes a number of assumptions such as weighted average cost of capital, projected sales volume, net sales, cost of sales and operating expenses. Changes in these assumptions could materially impact the fair value estimates. 31 The Company uses its overall market capitalization as part of its estimate of fair value of the reporting unit and in assessing the reasonableness of the Company’s internal estimates of fair value. To the extent that actual and projected cash flows decline in the future, or if market conditions deteriorate significantly, the Company may be required to perform an interim impairment analysis that could result in an impairment of franchise rights and goodwill. The Company has determined that there has not been an interim impairment trigger since the first day of the fourth quarter of 2012 annual test date. Income Tax Estimates The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of its deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is determined that it is more likely than not that such assets will not ultimately be realized. While the Company considers future taxable income and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance, should the Company determine it will not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance will be charged to income in the period in which such determination is made. A reduction in the valuation allowance and corresponding adjustment to income may be required if the likelihood of realizing existing deferred tax assets increases to a more likely than not level. The Company regularly reviews the realizability of deferred tax assets the and initiates a review when significant changes in the Company’s business occur that could impact realizability assessment. In addition to a valuation allowance related to net operating loss carryforwards, the Company records liabilities for uncertain tax positions related to certain state and federal income tax positions. These liabilities reflect the Company’s best estimate of the ultimate income tax liability based on currently known facts and information. Material changes in facts or information as well as the expiration of the statute of limitations and/or settlements with individual tax jurisdictions may result in material adjustments to these estimates in the future. The Company recorded net decreases to its liability for uncertain tax positions in 2011 and 2010 primarily as a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations. The Company recorded a net increase to its liability for uncertain tax positions in 2012. Revenue Recognition Revenues are recognized when finished products are delivered to customers and both title and the risks and benefits of ownership are transferred, price is fixed and determinable, collection is reasonably assured and, in the case of full service vending, when cash is collected from the vending machines. Appropriate provision is made for uncollectible accounts. The Company receives service fees from The Coca-Cola Company related to the delivery of fountain syrup products to The Coca-Cola Company’s fountain customers. In addition, the Company receives service fees from The Coca-Cola Company related to the repair of fountain equipment owned by The Coca-Cola Company. The fees received from The Coca-Cola Company for the delivery of fountain syrup products to their customers and the repair of their fountain equipment are recognized as revenue when the respective services are completed. Service revenue represents approximately 1% of net sales. The Company performs freight hauling and brokerage for third parties in addition to delivering its own products. The freight charges are recognized as revenues when the delivery is complete. Freight revenue from third parties represents approximately 1% of net sales. Revenues do not include sales or other taxes collected from customers. Risk Management Programs The Company uses various insurance structures to manage its workers’ compensation, auto liability, medical and other insurable risks. These structures consist of retentions, deductibles, limits and a diverse group of insurers that serve to strategically transfer and mitigate the financial impact of losses. The Company uses commercial insurance for claims as a risk reduction strategy to minimize catastrophic losses. Losses are accrued 32 using assumptions and procedures followed in the insurance industry, adjusted for company-specific history and expectations. The Company has standby letters of credit, primarily related to its property and casualty insurance programs. On December 30, 2012, these letters of credit totaled $20.8 million. In connection with the letters of credit, the Company was required to maintain $3.0 million in restricted cash as of January 1, 2012. The requirement to maintain restricted cash for these letters of credit was eliminated in the first quarter of 2012. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations The Company sponsors pension plans covering certain full-time nonunion employees and certain union employees who meet eligibility requirements. As discussed below, the Company ceased further benefit accruals under the principal Company-sponsored pension plan effective June 30, 2006. Several statistical and other factors, which attempt to anticipate future events, are used in calculating the expense and liability related to the plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets, employee turnover and age at retirement, as determined by the Company, within certain guidelines. In addition, the Company uses subjective factors such as mortality rates to estimate the projected benefit obligation. The actuarial assumptions used by the Company may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact to the amount of net periodic pension cost recorded by the Company in future periods. The discount rate used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation for the Company’s pension plans was 4.47% in 2012 and 5.18% in 2011. The discount rate assumption is generally the estimate which can have the most significant impact on net periodic pension cost and the projected benefit obligation for these pension plans. The Company determines an appropriate discount rate annually based on the annual yield on long-term corporate bonds as of the measurement date and reviews the discount rate assumption at the end of each year. On February 22, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to the principal Company-sponsored pension plan to cease further benefit accruals under the nonunion plan effective June 30, 2006. Annual pension costs were $2.9 million, $2.9 million and $5.7 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010 respectively. The decrease in pension plan expense in 2011 compared to 2010 was primarily due to a change in the mortality assumption offset by a change in the amortization period for future benefits. Annual pension expense is estimated to be approximately $1.7 million in 2013. A .25% increase or decrease in the discount rate assumption would have impacted the projected benefit obligation and net periodic pension cost of the Company-sponsored pension plans as follows: In Thousands Increase (decrease) in: .25% Increase .25% Decrease Projected benefit obligation at December 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net periodic pension cost in 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(11,138) (208) $11,832 208 The weighted average expected long-term rate of return of plan assets was 7% for 2012, 7% for 2011 and 8% for 2010. This rate reflects an estimate of long-term future returns for the pension plan assets. This estimate is primarily a function of the asset classes (equities versus fixed income) in which the pension plan assets are invested and the analysis of past performance of these asset classes over a long period of time. This analysis includes expected long-term inflation and the risk premiums associated with equity and fixed income investments. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for the details by asset type of the Company’s pension plan assets at December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, and the weighted average expected long-term rate of return of each asset type. The actual return of pension plan assets were gains of 12.9% for 2012, 0.9% for 2011 and 12.1% for 2010. The Company sponsors a postretirement health care plan for employees meeting specified qualifying criteria. Several statistical and other factors, which attempt to anticipate future events, are used in calculating the net periodic postretirement benefit cost and postretirement benefit obligation for this plan. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate and the expected growth rate for the cost of health care benefits. In addition, 33 the Company uses subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates to estimate the projected liability under this plan. The actuarial assumptions used by the Company may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants. The Company does not pre-fund its postretirement benefits and has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefits in the future. The discount rate assumption, the annual health care cost trend and the ultimate trend rate for health care costs are key estimates which can have a significant impact on the net periodic postretirement benefit cost and postretirement obligation in future periods. The Company annually determines the health care cost trend based on recent actual medical trend experience and projected experience for subsequent years. The discount rate assumptions used to determine the pension and postretirement benefit obligations are based on yield rates available on double-A bonds as of each plan’s measurement date. The discount rate used in determining the postretirement benefit obligation was 4.94% in 2011 and 4.11% in 2012. The discount rate was derived using the Aon/Hewitt AA above median yield curve. Projected benefit payouts for each plan were matched to the Aon/Hewitt AA above median yield curve and an equivalent flat rate was derived. A .25% increase or decrease in the discount rate assumption would have impacted the projected benefit obligation and service cost and interest cost of the Company’s postretirement benefit plan as follows: In Thousands Increase (decrease) in: .25% Increase .25% Decrease Postretirement benefit obligation at December 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service cost and interest cost in 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(2,045) (129) $2,149 134 A 1% increase or decrease in the annual health care cost trend would have impacted the postretirement benefit obligation and service cost and interest cost of the Company’s postretirement benefit plan as follows: In Thousands Increase (decrease) in: 1% Increase 1% Decrease Postretirement benefit obligation at December 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service cost and interest cost in 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $8,615 542 $(7,777) (490) New Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted Pronouncements In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended its guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income in financial statements to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items that are recorded in other comprehensive income. The new guidance requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. The Company elected to report components of comprehensive income in two separate but consecutive statements. The new guidance was effective for the quarter ended April 1, 2012 and was applied retrospectively. The Company’s adoption of the new guidance resulted in a change in the presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements but did not have any impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity. In September 2011, the FASB issued new guidance relative to the test for goodwill impairment. The new guidance permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 34 In July 2012, the FASB issued new guidance relative to the test for indefinite-lived intangibles impairment. The new guidance permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim indefinite-lived intangibles impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Recently Issued Pronouncements In December 2011, the FASB issued new guidance that is intended to enhance current disclosures on offsetting financial assets and liabilities. The new guidance requires an entity to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments eligible for offset on the balance sheet and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The provisions of the new guidance are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company does not expect the requirements of this new guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued new guidance which establishes new requirements for disclosing reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The new guidance requires a company to report the effect of significant reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to the respective line items in net income or cross-reference to other disclosures for items not reclassified entirely to net income. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The new guidance expands disclosure of other comprehensive income but does not change the manner in which items of other comprehensive income are accounted for or the way in which net income or other comprehensive income is reported in the financial statements. Results of Operations 2012 Compared to 2011 A summary of the Company’s financial results for 2012 and 2011 follows: Fiscal Year In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) 2012 2011 Change % Change Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S,D&A expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to noncontrolling $1,614,433 $1,561,239 654,309(1) 565,623 35,338 53,348 21,889(2) 31,459(1)(2) 629,243(3) 541,713(4) 35,979 51,551 19,528(5) 32,023(3)(4)(5) $53,194 25,066 23,910 (641) 1,797 2,361 (564) 3.4 4.0 4.4 (1.8) 3.5 12.1 (1.8) interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,242 3,415 827 24.2 Net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated . . . . . . . . . . . 27,217(1)(2) 28,608(3)(4)(5) (1,391) (4.9) Basic net income per share: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted net income per share: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ 2.95 2.95 2.94 2.92 $ $ $ $ 3.11 3.11 3.09 3.08 $ $ $ $ (.16) (.16) (.15) (.16) (5.1) (5.1) (4.9) (5.2) (1) Results in 2012 included a favorable mark-to-market adjustment of $0.5 million (pre-tax), or $0.3 million after tax, related to the Company’s commodity hedging program which was reflected as a decrease in cost of sales. (2) Results in 2012 included a debit of $1.5 million related to the increase of the valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets which was reflected as an increase to income tax expense. 35 (3) Results in 2011 included an unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment of $6.7 million (pre-tax), or $4.0 million after tax, related to the Company’s commodity hedging program, which was reflected as an increase in cost of sales. (4) Results in 2011 included an unfavorable mark-to market adjustment of $0.2 million (pre-tax), or $0.1 million after tax, related to the Company’s commodity hedging program, which was reflected as an increase in S,D&A expenses. (5) Results in 2011 included a credit of $0.9 million related to the reduction of the Company’s liability for uncertain tax positions mainly due to the expiration of applicable statute of limitations, which was reflected as a reduction to income tax expense. Net Sales Net sales increased $53.2 million, or 3.4%, to $1.61 billion in 2012 compared to $1.56 billion in 2011. This increase in net sales was principally attributable to the following: Amount Attributable to: (In Millions) $22.3 12.9 6.5 5.2 (4.4) 3.0 2.6 1.9 1.8 1.4 1.7% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to an increase in sales price per unit in sparkling beverages except energy products 1.0% increase in bottle/can volume to retail customers primarily due to a volume increase in still beverages 4.4% increase in sales price per unit of sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to an increase in sales price per unit in all product categories Increase in sales of the Company’s own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) 2.9% decrease in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to volume decreases in sparkling beverages 3.6% increase in post-mix sales price per unit Increase in data analysis and consulting services 2.3% increase in post-mix sales volume Increase in supply chain and logistics solutions consulting Other $53.2 Total increase in net sales In 2012, the Company’s bottle/can sales to retail customers accounted for 81.0% of total net sales. Bottle/ can net pricing is based on the invoice price charged to customers reduced by promotional allowances. Bottle/can net pricing per unit is impacted by the price charged per package, the volume generated in each package and the channels in which those packages are sold. Product category sales volume in 2012 and 2011 as a percentage of total bottle/can sales volume and the percentage change by product category were as follows: Product Category Bottle/Can Sales Volume 2012 2011 Bottle/Can Sales Volume % Increase (Decrease) Sparkling beverages (including energy products) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Still beverages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82.8% 84.1% 17.2% 15.9% Total bottle/can volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0% 100.0% (0.5) 9.1 1.0 36 The Company’s products are sold and distributed through various channels. They include selling directly to retail stores and other outlets such as food markets, institutional accounts and vending machine outlets. During 2012, approximately 68% of the Company’s bottle/can volume was sold for future consumption, while the remaining bottle/can volume of approximately 32% was sold for immediate consumption. The Company’s largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., accounted for approximately 22% of the Company’s total bottle/can volume and approximately 15% of the Company’s total net sales during 2012. The Company’s second largest customer, Food Lion, LLC, accounted for approximately 8% of the Company’s total bottle/can volume and approximately 6% of the Company’s total net sales during 2012. All of the Company’s beverage sales are to customers in the United States. The Company recorded delivery fees in net sales of $7.0 million in 2012 and $7.1 million in 2011. These fees are used to offset a portion of the Company’s delivery and handling costs. Cost of Sales Cost of sales includes the following: raw material costs, manufacturing labor, manufacturing overhead including depreciation expense, manufacturing warehousing costs and shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution centers. Cost of sales increased 3.0%, or $28.1 million, to $960.1 million in 2012 compared to $932.0 million in 2011. This increase in cost of sales was principally attributable to the following: Amount Attributable to: (In Millions) $22.1 Increases in raw material costs and increased purchases of finished products 7.6 3.9 (4.3) 1.0% increase in bottle/can volume to retail customers primarily due to a volume increase in still beverages Decrease in marketing funding support Company received primarily from The Coca-Cola 2.9% decrease in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to volume decreases in sparkling beverages (2.8) Decrease in cost due to the Company’s commodity hedging program 2.2 1.3 Increase in sales of the Company’s own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) 2.3% increase in post-mix sales volume (1.9) Other $28.1 Total increase in cost of sales The following inputs represent a substantial portion of the Company’s total cost of goods sold: (1) sweeteners, (2) packaging materials, including plastic bottles and aluminum cans, and (3) finished products purchased from other vendors. The Company anticipates that the cost of some of the underlying commodities related to these inputs, particularly corn, will continue to face upward pressure and gross margins on all categories of products will be lower throughout 2013 compared to 2012 due to the impact of these rising commodity costs unless they can be offset by price increases. The Company entered into an agreement (the “Incidence Pricing Agreement”) in 2008 with The Coca-Cola Company to test an incidence-based concentrate pricing model for 2008 for all Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages and Allied Beverages for which the Company purchases concentrate from The Coca-Cola Company. During the term of the Incidence Pricing Agreement, the pricing of the concentrates for the Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages 37 and Allied Beverages is governed by the Incidence Pricing Agreement rather than the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements. The concentrate price under the Incidence Pricing Agreement is impacted by a number of factors including the Company’s pricing of finished products, the channels in which the finished products are sold and package mix. The Coca-Cola Company must give the Company at least 90 days written notice before changing the price the Company pays for the concentrate. The Incidence Pricing Agreement has been extended twice and will remain in effect for the purchase of concentrate through December 31, 2013. The Company relies extensively on advertising and sales promotion in the marketing of its products. The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies that supply concentrates, syrups and finished products to the Company make substantial marketing and advertising expenditures to promote sales in the local territories served by the Company. The Company also benefits from national advertising programs conducted by The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies. Certain of the marketing expenditures by The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies are made pursuant to annual arrangements. Although The Coca-Cola Company has advised the Company that it intends to continue to provide marketing funding support, it is not obligated to do so under the Company’s Beverage Agreements. Significant decreases in marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company or other beverage companies could adversely impact operating results of the Company in the future. Total marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies, which includes direct payments to the Company and payments to the Company’s customers for marketing programs, was $53.6 million in 2012 compared to $57.5 million in 2011. Gross Margin Gross margin dollars increased 4.0%, or $25.1 million, to $654.3 million in 2012 compared to $629.2 million in 2011. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales increased to 40.5% in 2012 from 40.3% in 2011. This increase in gross margin was principally attributable to the following: Amount Attributable to: (In Millions) $22.3 1.7% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to an increase in sales price per unit in sparkling beverages except energy products (22.1) Increases in raw material costs and increased purchases of finished products 6.5 5.3 (3.9) 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.6 1.8 0.6 4.4% increase in sales price per unit of sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to an increase in sales price per unit in all product categories 1.0% increase in bottle/can volume to retail customers primarily due to a volume increase in still beverages Decrease in marketing funding support Company received primarily from The Coca-Cola Increase in sales of the Company’s own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) 3.6% increase in post-mix sales price per unit Decrease in cost due to the Company’s commodity hedging program Increase in data analysis and consulting services Increase in supply chain and logistics solutions consulting 2.3% increase in post-mix sales volume (0.1) 2.9% decrease in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to volume decreases in sparkling beverages 3.3 Other $25.1 Total increase in gross margin 38 The increase in gross margin percentage was primarily due to higher sales price per unit for bottle/can volume and lower sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers which have a lower gross margin percentage partially offset by higher costs of raw materials and increased purchases of finished products. The Company’s gross margins may not be comparable to other peer companies, since some of them include all costs related to their distribution network in cost of sales. The Company includes a portion of these costs in S,D&A expenses. S,D&A Expenses S,D&A expenses include the following: sales management labor costs, distribution costs from sales distribution centers to customer locations, sales distribution center warehouse costs, depreciation expense related to sales centers, delivery vehicles and cold drink equipment, point-of-sale expenses, advertising expenses, cold drink equipment repair costs, amortization of intangibles and administrative support labor and operating costs such as treasury, internal control services, human resources and executive management costs. information services, accounting, legal, S,D&A expenses increased by $23.9 million, or 4.4%, to $565.6 million in 2012 from $541.7 million in 2011. S,D&A expenses as a percentage of sales increased to 35.0% in 2012 from 34.7% in 2011. This increase in S,D&A expenses was principally attributable to the following: Amount Attributable to: (In Millions) $ 8.6 3.7 2.7 2.4 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.7 2.7 Increase in employee salaries including bonus and incentives due to normal salary increases and additional personnel Increase in employee benefit costs primarily due to increased medical insurance (active and retiree) offset by decreased 401(k) match expense Increase in marketing expense primarily due to various marketing programs Increase in professional and consulting expense Increase in software amortization (continued investment in technology) Increase in communication expense (primarily data) Increase in employer payroll taxes Increase in property and casualty insurance expense primarily due to an increase in workers’ compensation claims Other $23.9 Total increase in S,D&A expenses Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution centers are included in cost of sales. Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from sales distribution centers to customer locations are included in S,D&A expenses and totaled $200.0 million and $191.9 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. The net impact of the Company’s commodity hedging program on S,D&A expenses was an increase of $.6 million in 2011. There was no impact on S,D&A expenses in 2012. The Company’s expense recorded in S,D&A expenses related to the two Company-sponsored pension plans was $2.5 million in both 2012 and 2011. The Company provides a 401(k) Savings Plan for substantially all of the Company’s full-time employees who are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Company matched the first 3% of participants’ 39 contributions for 2011 while maintaining the option to increase the matching contributions an additional 2%, for a total of 5%, for the Company’s employees based on the financial results for 2011. The 2% matching contributions were accrued during 2011 for a total accrual of $2.8 million. Based on the Company’s financial results, the Company decided to increase the matching contributions for the additional 2% for the entire year of 2011. The Company made this additional contribution payment for 2011 in the first quarter of 2012. During the first quarter of 2012, the Company decided to change the Company’s matching from fixed to discretionary and no longer match the first 3% of participants’ contributions while maintaining the option to make matching contributions for eligible participants of up to 5% based on the Company’s financial results for 2012 and future years. The 5% matching contributions were accrued (less 3% matching contributions paid in the first quarter of 2012) during 2012 for a total accrual of $7.7 million. Based on the Company’s financial results, the Company decided to make matching contributions of 5% of participants’ contributions for the entire year of 2012. The Company made this contribution payment for 2012 in the first quarter of 2013. The total expense for this benefit recorded in S,D&A expenses was $7.2 million and $7.5 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Interest Expense Net interest expense decreased 1.8%, or $.6 million in 2012 compared to 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the repayment at maturity of $150 million of Senior Notes in November 2012. This was partially offset by the Company entering into two new capital leases in the first quarter of 2011. The Company’s overall weighted average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations increased to 6.1% during 2012 from 6.0% during 2011. See the “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Hedging Activities Interest and Hedging” section of M,D&A for additional information. Income Taxes The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes, for 2012 and 2011 was 41.0% and 37.9%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate for 2012 resulted primarily from an increase in the liability for uncertain tax positions and an increase to the valuation allowance in 2012 as compared to 2011. The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes minus net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, for 2012 and 2011 was 44.6% and 40.6%, respectively. The Company increased its valuation allowance by $1.8 million for 2012. The net effect was an increase in income tax expense due primarily to the Company’s assessment of its ability to use certain net operating loss carryforwards. In 2012, the Company increased its liability for uncertain tax positions by $.8 million resulting in an increase to income tax expense. In 2011, the Company reduced its liability for uncertain tax positions by $.2 million resulting in a decrease to income tax expense. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. The Company’s income tax assets and liabilities are subject to adjustment in future periods based on the Company’s ongoing evaluations of such assets and liabilities and new information that becomes available to the Company. Noncontrolling Interest The Company recorded net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of $4.2 million in 2012 compared to $3.4 million in 2011 primarily related to the portion of Piedmont owned by The Coca-Cola Company. 40 2011 Compared to 2010 A summary of the Company’s financial results for 2011 and 2010 follows: Fiscal Year In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) 2011 2010 Change % Change Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,561,239 Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S,D&A expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income attributable to 629,243(1) 541,713(2) 35,979 51,551 19,528(3) 32,023(1)(2)(3) $1,514,599 640,816(4)(5) 544,498(6)(7) 35,127 61,191 21,649(8) 39,542(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) $ 46,640 (11,573) (2,785) 852 (9,640) (2,121) (7,519) 3.1 (1.8) (0.5) 2.4 (15.8) (9.8) (19.0) noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . 3,415 3,485 (70) (2.0) Net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated . . . . . . . . 28,608(1)(2)(3) 36,057(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) (7,449) (20.7) Basic net income per share: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . Diluted net income per share: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . 3.11 3.11 3.09 3.08 $ $ $ $ 3.93 3.93 3.91 3.90 $ $ $ $ (.82) (.82) (.82) (.82) (20.9) (20.9) (21.0) (21.0) (1) Results in 2011 included an unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment of $6.7 million (pre-tax), or $4.0 million after tax, related to the Company’s commodity hedging program, which was reflected as an increase in cost of sales. (2) Results in 2011 included an unfavorable mark-to market adjustment of $0.2 million (pre-tax), or $0.1 million after tax, related to the Company’s commodity hedging program, which was reflected as an increase in S,D&A expenses. (3) Results in 2011 included a credit of $0.9 million related to the reduction of the Company’s liability for uncertain tax positions mainly due to the expiration of applicable statute of limitations, which was reflected as a reduction to income tax expense. (4) Results in 2010 included an unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment of $3.8 million (pre-tax), or $2.3 million after tax, related to the Company’s commodity hedging program, which was reflected as an increase in cost of sales. (5) Results in 2010 included a credit of $.9 million (pre-tax), or $.6 million after tax, related to the gain on the replacement of flood damaged equipment, which was reflected as a reduction in cost of sales. (6) Results in 2010 included an unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment of $1.4 million (pre-tax), or $0.9 million after tax, related to the Company’s commodity hedging program, which was reflected as an increase in S,D&A expenses. (7) Results in 2010 included a debit of $3.7 million (pre-tax), or $2.2 million after tax, related to the impairment/accelerated depreciation of property, plant and equipment, which was reflected as an increase in S,D&A expenses. (8) Results in 2010 included a credit of $1.7 million related to the reduction of the Company’s liability for uncertain tax positions mainly due to the expiration of applicable statute of limitations, which was reflected as a reduction to income tax expense and a debit of $.5 million related to the impact of the change in the tax law eliminating the tax deduction for Medicare Part D subsidy, which was reflected as an increase to income tax expense. 41 Net Sales Net sales increased $46.6 million, or 3.1%, to $1.56 billion in 2011 compared to $1.51 billion in 2010. This increase in net sales was principally attributable to the following: Amount Attributable to: (In Millions) $23.1 6.6 7.9 3.7 3.7 3.4 1.7 1.8% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to an increase in sales price per unit in sparkling beverages (except energy products) and a change in product mix due to a higher percentage of still beverages sold, which have a higher sales price per unit partially offset by a decrease in sales price per unit of still beverages 4.6% increase in sales price per unit of sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to an increase in sales price per unit in all product categories except energy products Increase in freight revenue .3% increase in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume increase in still beverages partially offset by a volume decrease in sparkling beverages except energy products 5.0% increase in post-mix sales volume Increase in sales of the Company’s own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) 2.2% increase in post-mix sales price per unit (1.2) .9% decrease in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to volume decreases in sparkling beverages (2.3) Other $46.6 Total increase in net sales In 2011, the Company’s bottle/can sales to retail customers accounted for 81.5% of total net sales. Bottle/ can net pricing is based on the invoice price charged to customers reduced by promotional allowances. Bottle/can net pricing per unit is impacted by the price charged per package, the volume generated in each package and the channels in which those packages are sold. The increase in sales price per unit of sparkling beverages and the volume decrease in sparkling beverages in 2011 were primarily the result of an event that occurred in 2010 which was not repeated in 2011. During all of the second quarter of 2010, the Company’s largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., had a promotion on 24-pack 12-ounce cans which increased overall 12-ounce sparkling can sales volume and overall bottle/can volume in 2010 while lowering sparkling sales price per unit as 24-pack 12-ounce cans have a lower sales price per unit than other sparkling beverages. Product category sales volume in 2011 and 2010 as a percentage of total bottle/can sales volume and the percentage change by product category were as follows: Product Category Bottle/Can Sales Volume 2011 2010 Bottle/Can Sales Volume % Increase (Decrease) Sparkling beverages (including energy products) . . . . . . . . . Still beverages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84.1% 85.0% 15.9% 15.0% Total bottle/can volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0% 100.0% (0.7) 6.1 0.3 42 The Company’s products are sold and distributed through various channels. They include selling directly to retail stores and other outlets such as food markets, institutional accounts and vending machine outlets. During 2011, approximately 69% of the Company’s bottle/can volume was sold for future consumption, while the remaining bottle/can volume of approximately 31% was sold for immediate consumption. The Company’s largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., accounted for approximately 21% of the Company’s total bottle/can volume and approximately 15% of the Company’s total net sales during 2011. The Company’s second largest customer, Food Lion, LLC, accounted for approximately 9% of the Company’s total bottle/can volume and approximately 7% of the Company’s total net sales during 2011. All of the Company’s beverage sales are to customers in the United States. The Company recorded delivery fees in net sales of $7.1 million in 2011 and $7.5 million in 2010. These fees are used to offset a portion of the Company’s delivery and handling costs. Cost of Sales Cost of sales increased 6.7%, or $58.2 million, to $932.0 million in 2011 compared to $873.8 million in 2010. This increase in cost of sales was principally attributable to the following: Amount Attributable to: (In Millions) $45.3 Increases in raw material costs such as plastic bottles 7.4 (3.9) 2.5 2.1 1.3 (1.1) 0.9 (0.4) 4.1 Increase in freight cost of sales Increase in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola Company 5.0% increase in post-mix sales volume .3% increase in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume increase in still beverages that was partially offset by a decrease in sparkling beverages (except energy products) Increase in sales of the Company’s own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) .9% decrease in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to decreases in sparkling beverages Gain on the replacement of flood damaged production equipment in 2010 Decrease in cost due to the Company’s commodity hedging program Other $58.2 Total increase in cost of sales The Company entered into an agreement (the “Incidence Pricing Agreement”) in 2008 with The Coca-Cola Company to test an incidence-based concentrate pricing model for 2008 for all Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages and Allied Beverages for which the Company purchases concentrate from The Coca-Cola Company. During the term of the Incidence Pricing Agreement, the pricing of the concentrates for the Coca-Cola Trademark Beverages and Allied Beverages is governed by the Incidence Pricing Agreement rather than the Cola and Allied Beverage Agreements. The concentrate price under the Incidence Pricing Agreement is impacted by a number of factors including the Company’s pricing of finished products, the channels in which the finished products are sold and package mix. The Coca-Cola Company must give the Company at least 90 days written notice before changing the price the Company pays for the concentrate. For 2010 and 2011, the Company continued to utilize the incidence pricing model. Total marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies, which includes direct payments to the Company and payments to the Company’s customers for marketing programs, was $57.5 million in 2011 compared to $53.6 million in 2010. 43 The Company’s production facility located in Nashville, Tennessee was damaged by a flood in May 2010. The Company recorded a gain of $.9 million from the replacement of production equipment damaged by the flood. The gain was based on replacement value insurance coverage that exceeded the net book value of the damaged production equipment. Gross Margin Gross margin dollars decreased 1.8%, or $11.6 million, to $629.2 million in 2011 compared to $640.8 million in 2010. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales decreased to 40.3% in 2011 from 42.3% in 2010. This decrease in gross margin was principally attributable to the following: Amount Attributable to: (In Millions) $(45.3) Increases in raw material costs such as plastic bottles 23.1 6.6 3.9 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.2 (0.9) 0.5 0.4 (0.1) 1.8% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit primarily due to an increase in sales price per unit in sparkling beverages (except energy products) and a change in product mix due to a higher percentage of still beverages sold, which have a higher sales price per unit partially offset by a decrease in sales price per unit of still beverages 4.6% increase in sales price per unit of sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to an increase in sales price per unit in all product categories except energy products Increase in marketing funding support received primarily from The Coca-Cola Company Increase in sales of the Company’s own brand portfolio (primarily Tum-E Yummies) 2.2% increase in post-mix sales price per unit .3% increase in bottle/can volume primarily due to a volume increase in still beverages partially offset by a decrease in sparkling beverages except energy products 5.0% increase in post-mix sales volume Gain on the replacement of flood damaged production equipment in 2010 Increase in freight gross margin Decrease in cost due to the Company’s commodity hedging program .9% decrease in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers primarily due to volume decreases in sparkling beverages (6.4) Other $(11.6) Total decrease in gross margin The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily due to higher costs of raw materials that were partially offset by higher bottle/can sales prices per unit. The Company’s gross margins may not be comparable to other peer companies, since some of them include all costs related to their distribution network in cost of sales. The Company includes a portion of these costs in S,D&A expenses. S,D&A Expenses S,D&A expenses decreased by $2.8 million, or .5%, to $541.7 million in 2011 from $544.5 million in 2010. S,D&A expenses as a percentage of sales decreased to 34.7% in 2011 from 35.9% in 2010. 44 This decrease in S,D&A expenses was principally attributable to the following: Amount Attributable to: (In Millions) $(3.7) (2.5) 2.3 (2.2) 1.9 1.8 0.7 (0.6) (0.5) 0.5 0.2 Decrease in impairment/accelerated depreciation of property, plant and equipment ($3.7 million in 2010) Decrease in bonus expense, incentive expense and other performance pay initiatives due to the Company’s financial performance Increase in marketing expense primarily due to various marketing programs Decrease in property and casualty insurance expense primarily due to a decrease in auto and workers’ compensation claims Increase in employee salaries primarily due to normal salary increases Increase in depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment primarily due to increased purchases of refurbished vending machines with shorter useful lives, increased amortization from software projects and two additional capital leases entered into the first quarter of 2011 Increase in fuel costs related to the movement of finished goods from sales distribution centers to customer locations Decrease in loss on sale of property, plant and equipment Decrease in professional fees primarily due to consulting project support in 2010 Increase in bad debt expense Increase in employee benefit costs primarily due to increased medical insurance (active and retiree) offset by decreased pension expense (0.7) Other $(2.8) Total decrease in S,D&A expenses Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution centers are included in cost of sales. Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from sales distribution centers to customer locations are included in S,D&A expenses and totaled $191.9 million and $187.2 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. The net impact of the Company’s commodity hedging program on S,D&A expenses was an increase of $.6 million and $1.7 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. During 2010, the Company performed a review of property, plant and equipment. As a result of this review, $.9 million was recorded to impairment expense for five Company-owned sales distribution centers held-for-sale. The Company also recorded accelerated depreciation of $.5 million for certain other property, plant and equipment which was replaced in the first quarter of 2011. During 2010, the Company also determined the warehouse operations in Sumter, South Carolina would be relocated to other facilities and recorded impairment and accelerated depreciation of $2.2 million for the value of equipment and real estate related to the Sumter, South Carolina property. The Company’s expense recorded in S,D&A expenses related to the two Company-sponsored pension plans decreased by $2.4 million from $4.9 million in 2010 to $2.5 million in 2011. The Company provides a 401(k) Savings Plan for substantially all of the Company’s full-time employees who are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Company matched the first 3% of participants’ contributions for 2010 and 2011. The Company maintained the option to increase the Company’s matching contributions by up to an additional 2%, for a total of 5%, based on the Company’s financial results. Based on the 45 Company’s financial results, the Company decided to increase the matching contributions for the additional 2% for the entire year of 2010. The Company made these additional contribution payments for each quarter in 2010 in the following quarter concluding with the fourth quarter of 2010 payment being made in the first quarter of 2011. Based on the Company’s financial results, the Company decided to increase the matching contributions for the additional 2% for the entire year of 2011. The 2% matching contributions were accrued during 2011. The Company made the additional contribution payment for 2011 in the first quarter of 2012. The total cost, including the 2% matching contributions for this benefit recorded in S,D&A expenses, was $7.5 million and $7.6 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest Expense Net interest expense increased 2.4%, or $.9 million in 2011 compared to 2010. The increase was primarily due to the Company entering into two new capital leases in the first quarter of 2011. The Company’s overall weighted average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations increased to 6.0% during 2011 from 5.9% during 2010. This increase is the result of the conversion of one of the Company’s capital leases from a floating rate to a fixed rate in late 2010, combined with the Company’s use of short-term borrowings in 2010 at low variable rates relative to the fixed rates on the Company’s Senior Debt. See the “Liquidity and Capital Resources — Hedging Activities — Interest Rate Hedging” section of M,D&A for additional information. Income Taxes The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes, for 2011 and 2010 was 37.9% and 35.4%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate for 2011 resulted primarily from a comparatively lower reduction in the liability for uncertain tax positions and an increase to the valuation allowance in 2011 as compared to 2010. The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes minus net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, for 2011 and 2010 was 40.6% and 37.5%, respectively. During 2010, the Company reduced its liability for uncertain tax positions by $1.7 million resulting in a decrease in income tax expense. The reduction of the liability for uncertain tax positions was due primarily to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. During 2011, the Company reduced its liability for uncertain tax positions by $.9 million resulting in a decrease in income tax expense. The reduction of the liability for uncertain tax positions was due primarily to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. Noncontrolling Interest The Company recorded net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of $3.4 million in 2011 compared to $3.5 million in 2010 primarily related to the portion of Piedmont owned by The Coca-Cola Company. Financial Condition Total assets decreased to $1.28 billion at December 30, 2012 from $1.36 billion at January 1, 2012 primarily due to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents (primarily due to the repayment of Senior Notes in November 2012). Net working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, increased by $6.6 million to $25.0 million at December 30, 2012 from $18.4 million at January 1, 2012. Significant changes in net working capital from January 1, 2012 to December 30, 2012 were as follows: • A decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $80.4 million primarily due to the repayment of Senior Notes in November 2012. • An increase in accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company and a decrease in accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company of $6.2 million and $6.3 million, respectively, primarily due to the timing of payments. 46 • A decrease in current portion of long-term debt of $100.0 million due to the repayment of $150 million of Senior Notes that matured in November 2012. The Company had $20 million outstanding on an uncommitted line of credit at the end of 2012 that was used to repay the Senior Notes in November 2012. In 2011, $120 million of the $150 million Senior Notes due November 2012 was classified as current as to be paid from available cash plus amounts borrowed from an this was the expected amount uncommitted line of credit. The remaining $30 million of Senior Notes due in 2012 was expected to be paid from amounts to be borrowed on the Company’s $200 million five-year unsecured revolving credit facility (“$200 million facility”). • An increase in accounts payable, trade of $9.4 million primarily due to the timing of payments. • An increase in other accrued liabilities of $6.9 million primarily due to an increase in employee benefits accruals and the timing of payments. Debt and capital lease obligations were $493.0 million as of December 30, 2012 compared to $597.3 million as of January 1, 2012. Debt and capital lease obligations as of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012 included $69.6 million and $74.1 million, respectively, of capital lease obligations related primarily to Company facilities. Contributions to the Company’s pension plans were $25.0 million and $9.5 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company anticipates that contributions to the principal Company-sponsored pension plan in 2013 will be in the range of $1 million to $5 million. Liquidity and Capital Resources Capital Resources The Company’s sources of capital include cash flows from operations, available credit facilities and the issuance of debt and equity securities. Management believes the Company has sufficient financial resources available to finance its business plan, meet its working capital requirements and maintain an appropriate level of capital spending for at least the next 12 months. The amount and frequency of future dividends will be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors in light of the earnings and financial condition of the Company at such time, and no assurance can be given that dividends will be declared or paid in the future. As of December 30, 2012, the Company had $170 million available under the $200 million facility to meet its cash requirements. On September 21, 2011, the Company entered into the $200 million facility replacing the Company’s previous $200 million five-year unsecured revolving credit facility, dated March 8, 2007, which had been scheduled to mature in March 2012. The $200 million facility has a scheduled maturity date of September 21, 2016 and up to $25 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit. Borrowings under the agreement bear interest at a floating base rate or a floating Eurodollar rate plus an interest rate spread, dependent on the Company’s credit rating at the time of borrowing. The Company must pay an annual facility fee of .175% of the lenders’ aggregate commitments under the facility. The $200 million facility contains two financial covenants: a cash flow/fixed charges ratio (“fixed charges coverage ratio”) and funded indebtedness/cash flow ratio (“operating cash flow ratio”), each as defined in the credit agreement. The fixed charges coverage ratio requires the Company to maintain a consolidated cash flow to fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1.0 or higher. The operating cash flow ratio requires the Company to maintain a debt to operating cash flow ratio of 6.0 to 1.0 or lower. The Company is currently in compliance with these covenants. These covenants do not currently, and the Company does not anticipate they will, restrict its liquidity or capital resources. The Company currently believes that all of the banks participating in the Company’s $200 million facility have the ability to and will meet any funding requests from the Company. On February 10, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement for an uncommitted line of credit. Under this agreement, which is still in place, the Company may borrow up to a total of $20 million for periods of 7 days, 30 days, 60 days or 90 days at the discretion of the participating bank. 47 The Company used a combination of available cash on hand, borrowings on the uncommitted line of credit and borrowings under the $200 million facility to repay $150 million of the Company’s Senior Notes that matured in November 2012. The Company classified $30 million of these Senior Notes as long-term at January 1, 2012 representing the portion the Company expected to repay using the $200 million facility. The Company has obtained the majority of its long-term financing, other than capital leases, from public markets. As of December 30, 2012, $373.4 million of the Company’s total outstanding balance of debt and capital lease obligations of $493.0 million was financed through publicly offered debt. The Company had capital lease obligations of $69.6 million as of December 30, 2012. On December 30, 2012, the Company had $30.0 million and $20.0 million outstanding on the $200 million facility and the Company’s uncommitted line of credit, respectively. Cash Sources and Uses The primary sources of cash for the Company has been cash provided by operating activities. The primary uses of cash have been for capital expenditures, the payment of debt and capital lease obligations, dividend payments, income tax payments and pension payments. A summary of cash activity for 2012 and 2011 follows: In Millions Fiscal Year 2012 2011 Cash sources Cash provided by operating activities (excluding income tax and pension payments) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from $200 million facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from uncommitted line of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from the reduction of restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $122.3 30.0 20.0 3.0 .7 $139.6 — — .5 1.8 Total cash sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $176.0 $141.9 Cash uses Payment of $150 million Senior Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contributions to pension plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payment of capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $150.0 53.3 — 25.0 4.7 14.1 9.2 .1 $ — 53.2 .7 9.5 3.8 20.4 9.2 .2 Total cash uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $256.4 $ 97.0 Increase (decrease) in cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (80.4) $ 44.9 Based on current projections, which include a number of assumptions such as the Company’s pre-tax earnings, the Company anticipates its cash requirements for income taxes will be between $18 million and $25 million in 2013. Operating Activities During 2012, cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $26.5 million compared to 2011. The decrease was primarily due to net changes in accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company and accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company of $25.2 million, a $12.5 million decrease in 2012 compared to a 48 $12.7 million increase in 2011. Additionally, an increase in contributions to pension plans of $15.5 million, $25.0 million in 2012 compared to $9.5 million in 2011 was offset by a decrease in income tax payments of $6.3 million, $14.1 million paid in 2012 compared to $20.4 million in 2011. Investing Activities Additions to property, plant and equipment during 2012 were $61.5 million of which $14.4 million were accrued in accounts payable, trade as unpaid. This amount compared to $49.0 million in additions to property, plant and equipment during 2011 of which $6.2 million were accrued in accounts payable, trade as unpaid. Capital expenditures during 2012 were funded with cash flows from operations. The Company anticipates that additions to property, plant and equipment in 2013 will be in the range of $75 million to $85 million. Leasing is used for certain capital additions when considered cost effective relative to other sources of capital. The Company currently leases its corporate headquarters, two production facilities and several sales distribution facilities and administrative facilities. Financing Activities As of December 30, 2012, the Company had $170 million available under the $200 million facility to meet its short-term borrowing requirements. On September 21, 2011, the Company entered into the $200 million facility replacing the Company’s previous $200 million five-year unsecured revolving credit facility, dated March 8, 2007, which had been scheduled to mature in March 2012. The $200 million facility has a scheduled maturity date of September 21, 2016 and up to $25 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit. Borrowings under the agreement will bear interest at a floating base rate or a floating Eurodollar rate plus an interest rate spread, dependent on the Company’s credit rating at the time of borrowing. The Company must pay an annual facility fee of .175% of the lenders’ aggregate commitments under the facility. The $200 million facility contains two financial covenants: a cash flow/fixed charges ratio (“fixed charges coverage ratio”) and funded indebtedness/cash flow ratio (“operating cash flow ratio”), each as defined in the credit agreement. The fixed charges coverage ratio requires the Company to maintain a consolidated cash flow to fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1.0 or higher. The operating cash flow ratio requires the Company to maintain a debt to operating cash flow ratio of 6.0 to 1.0 or lower. The Company is currently in compliance with these covenants. These covenants do not currently, and the Company does not anticipate they will, restrict its liquidity or capital resources. The Company currently believes that all of the banks participating in the Company’s new $200 million facility have the ability to and will meet any funding requests from the Company. On December 30, 2012 the Company had $30.0 million outstanding borrowings under the $200 million facility. On January 1, 2012, the Company had no outstanding borrowings on the $200 million facility. On February 10, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement for an uncommitted line of credit. Under this agreement, which is still in place, the Company may borrow up to a total of $20 million for periods of 7 days, 30 days, 60 days or 90 days at the discretion of the participating bank. On December 30, 2012, the Company had $20.0 million outstanding under the uncommitted line of credit. On January 1, 2012, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the uncommitted line of credit. The Company used a combination of available cash on hand, borrowings on the uncommitted line of credit and borrowings under the $200 million facility to repay $150 million of the Company’s Senior Notes that matured in November 2012. The Company had classified $30 million of these Senior Notes as long-term at January 1, 2012 representing the portion the Company expected to repay using the $200 million facility. All of the outstanding debt has been issued by the Company with none having been issued by any of the Company’s subsidiaries. There are no guarantees of the Company’s debt. The Company or its subsidiaries have entered into seven capital leases. 49 At December 30, 2012, the Company’s credit ratings were as follows: Standard & Poor’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Moody’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BBB Baa2 Long-Term Debt The Company’s credit ratings, which the Company is disclosing to enhance understanding of the Company’s sources of liquidity and the effect of the Company’s ratings on the Company’s cost of funds, are reviewed periodically by the respective rating agencies. Changes in the Company’s operating results or financial position could result in changes in the Company’s credit ratings. Lower credit ratings could result in higher borrowing costs for the Company or reduced access to capital markets, which could have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. There were no changes in these credit ratings from the prior year and the credit ratings are currently stable. The Company’s public debt is not subject to financial covenants but does limit the incurrence of certain liens and encumbrances as well as indebtedness by the Company’s subsidiaries in excess of certain amounts. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements The Company is a member of two manufacturing cooperatives and has guaranteed $35.9 million of their debt as of December 30, 2012. In addition, the Company has an equity ownership in each of the entities. The members of both cooperatives consist solely of Coca-Cola bottlers. The Company does not anticipate either of these cooperatives will fail to fulfill its commitments. The Company further believes each of these cooperatives has sufficient assets, including production equipment, facilities and working capital, and the ability to adjust selling prices of its products to adequately mitigate the risk of material loss from the Company’s guarantees. As of December 30, 2012, the Company’s maximum exposure, if both of these cooperatives borrowed up to their aggregate borrowing capacity, would have been $72.8 million including the Company’s equity interest. See Note 13 and Note 18 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information. Aggregate Contractual Obligations The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 30, 2012: In Thousands Total 2013 2014-2015 2016-2017 2018 and Thereafter Payments Due by Period Contractual obligations: Total debt, net of interest Capital lease obligations, net . . . . of interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Estimated interest on debt and capital lease obligations(1) . . . . . . . . . . . Purchase obligations(2) . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term contractual arrangements(4) . . . . . . . . . . Postretirement obligations . . . . Purchase orders(5) . . . . . . . . . . $ 423,386 $ 20,000 $100,000 $194,757 $108,629 69,581 5,230 11,939 14,162 38,250 114,703 133,060 124,846 40,846 35,985 69,828 35,029 26,204 93,925 12,393 5,974 9,330 2,653 35,029 46,521 39,135 18,050 9,936 13,972 6,046 — 25,436 — 13,277 6,702 5,950 7,210 — 16,542 — 81,126 18,234 6,733 53,919 — Total contractual obligations . . . . . . $1,047,264 $210,738 $245,599 $267,494 $323,433 50 Includes interest payments based on contractual terms. (1) (2) Represents an estimate of the Company’s obligation to purchase 17.5 million cases of finished product on an (3) (4) annual basis through May 2014 from South Atlantic Canners, a manufacturing cooperative. Includes obligations under executive benefit plans, the liability to exit from a multi-employer pension plan and other long-term liabilities. Includes contractual arrangements with certain prestige properties, athletic venues and other locations, and other long-term marketing commitments. (5) Purchase orders include commitments in which a written purchase order has been issued to a vendor, but the goods have not been received or the services performed. The Company has $5.5 million of uncertain tax positions including accrued interest, as of December 30, 2012 (excluded from other long-term liabilities in the table above because the Company is uncertain if or when such amounts will be recognized) of which $3.0 million would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. While it is expected that the amount of uncertain tax positions may change in the next 12 months, the Company does not expect such change would have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 14 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information. The Company is a member of Southeastern Container, a plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative, from which the Company is obligated to purchase at least 80% of its requirements of plastic bottles for certain designated territories. This obligation is not included in the Company’s table of contractual obligations and commercial commitments since there are no minimum purchase requirements. See Note 13 and Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to Southeastern. As of December 30, 2012, the Company had $20.8 million of standby letters of credit, primarily related to its property and casualty insurance programs. See Note 13 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to commercial commitments, guarantees, legal and tax matters. The Company contributed $25.0 million to its two Company-sponsored pension plans in 2012. Based on information currently available, the Company estimates it will be required to make cash contributions in 2013 in the range of $1 million to $5 million to those two plans. Postretirement medical care payments are expected to be approximately $3 million in 2013. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to pension and postretirement obligations. Hedging Activities Interest Rate Hedging The Company periodically uses interest rate hedging products to mitigate risk from interest rate fluctuations. The Company has historically altered its fixed/floating rate mix based upon anticipated cash flows from operations relative to the Company’s debt level and the potential impact of changes in interest rates on the Company’s overall financial condition. Sensitivity analyses are performed to review the impact on the Company’s financial position and coverage of various interest rate movements. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes nor does it use leveraged financial instruments. The Company has not had any interest rate swap agreements outstanding since September 2008. Interest expense was reduced by $1.1 million, $1.2 million and $1.2 million due to amortization of the deferred gains on previously terminated interest rate swap agreements and forward interest rate agreements during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest expense will be reduced by the amortization of these deferred gains in 2013 through 2015 as follows: $.5 million, $.6 million, and $.1 million, respectively. As of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the Company had a weighted average interest rate of 5.9% and 6.0%, respectively, for its outstanding debt and capital lease obligations. The Company’s overall weighted 51 average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations increased to 6.1% in 2012 from 6.0% in 2011. As of December 30, 2012, $50.0 million of the Company’s debt and capital lease obligations of $493.0 million was maintained on a floating rate basis or was subject to changes in short-term interest rates. Commodity Hedging The Company entered into derivative instruments to hedge certain commodity purchases for 2013, 2011 and 2010. The Company pays fees for these instruments which are amortized over the corresponding period of the instrument. The Company accounts for its commodity hedges on a mark-to-market basis with any expense or income reflected as an adjustment of cost of sales or S,D&A expenses. The Company uses several different financial institutions for commodity derivative instruments to minimize the concentration of credit risk. The Company has master agreements with the counterparties to its derivative financial agreements that provide for net settlement of derivative transactions. The net impact of the commodity hedges was to decrease the cost of sales by $.5 million in 2012, increase the cost of sales by $2.3 million in 2011 and increase the cost of sales by $2.6 million in 2010 and to increase S,D&A expenses by $.6 million and $1.7 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. 52 CAUTIONARY INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as information included in future filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and information contained in written material, press releases and oral statements issued by or on behalf of the Company, contains, or may contain, forward-looking management comments and other statements that reflect management’s current outlook for future periods. These statements include, among others, statements relating to: • the Company’s belief that the covenants on its $200 million facility will not restrict its liquidity or capital resources; • the Company’s belief that other parties to certain contractual arrangements will perform their obligations; • the Company’s potential marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies; • the Company’s belief that the risk of loss with respect to funds deposited with banks is minimal; • the Company’s belief that disposition of certain claims and legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, cash flows or results of operations and that no material amount of loss in excess of recorded amounts is reasonably possible as a result of these claims and legal proceedings; • the Company’s belief that the Company has adequately provided for any ultimate amounts that are likely to result from tax audits; • the Company’s belief that the Company has sufficient resources available to finance its business plan, meet its working capital requirements and maintain an appropriate level of capital spending; • the Company’s belief that the cooperatives whose debt the Company guarantees have sufficient assets and the ability to adjust selling prices of their products to adequately mitigate the risk of material loss and that the cooperatives will perform their obligations under their debt commitments; • the Company’s belief that certain franchise rights are perpetual or will be renewed upon expiration; • the Company’s key priorities which are revenue management, product innovation and beverage portfolio expansion, distribution cost management and productivity; • the Company’s expectation that new product introductions, packaging changes and sales promotions will continue to require substantial expenditures; • the Company’s belief that there is substantial and effective competition in each of the exclusive geographic territories in the United States in which it operates for the purposes of the United States Soft Drink Interbrand Competition Act; • the Company’s belief that it may market and sell nationally certain products it has developed and owns; • the Company’s belief that cash requirements for income taxes will be in the range of $18 million to $25 million in 2013; • the Company’s anticipation that pension expense related to the two Company-sponsored pension plans is estimated to be approximately $2 million in 2013; • the Company’s belief that cash contributions in 2013 to its two Company-sponsored pension plans will be in the range of $1 million to $5 million; • the Company’s belief that postretirement benefit payments are expected to be approximately $3 million in 2013; • the Company’s expectation that additions to property, plant and equipment in 2013 will be in the range of $75 million to $85 million; 53 • the Company’s belief that compliance with environmental laws will not have a material adverse effect on its capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position; • the Company’s belief that the majority of its deferred tax assets will be realized; • the Company’s intention to renew substantially all the Allied Beverage Agreements and Still Beverage Agreements as they expire; • the Company’s beliefs and estimates regarding the impact of the adoption of certain new accounting pronouncements; • the Company’s expectations that raw materials will rise significantly in 2013 and that gross margins will be lower throughout 2013 compared to 2012, if these costs cannot be offset with price increases; • the Company’s belief that innovation of new brands and packages will continue to be critical to the Company’s overall revenue; • the Company’s beliefs that the growth prospects of Company-owned or exclusive licensed brands appear promising and the cost of developing, marketing and distributing these brands may be significant; • the Company’s expectation that uncertain tax positions may change over the next 12 months but will not have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements; • the Company’s belief that all of the banks participating in the Company’s $200 million facility have the ability to and will meet any funding requests from the Company; • the Company’s belief that it is competitive in its territories with respect to the principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage industry; • the Company’s hypothetical calculation of the impact of a 1% increase in interest rates on outstanding floating rate debt and capital lease obligations for the next twelve months as of December 30, 2012; and • the Company’s estimate that a 10% increase in the market price of certain commodities over the current market prices would cumulatively increase costs during the next 12 months by approximately $23 million assuming no change in volume. These statements and expectations are based on currently available competitive, financial and economic data along with the Company’s operating plans, and are subject to future events and uncertainties that could cause anticipated events not to occur or actual results to differ materially from historical or anticipated results. Factors that could impact those differences or adversely affect future periods include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth under Item 1A. — Risk Factors. Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on the Company’s forward-looking statements, which reflect the expectations of management of the Company only as of the time such statements are made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. 54 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk The Company is exposed to certain market risks that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company may enter into derivative financial instrument transactions to manage or reduce market risk. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions for trading purposes. A discussion of the Company’s primary market risk exposure and interest rate risk is presented below. Debt and Derivative Financial Instruments The Company is subject to interest rate risk on its fixed and floating rate debt. The Company periodically uses interest rate hedging products to modify risk from interest rate fluctuations. The counterparties to these interest rate hedging arrangements were major financial institutions with which the Company also has other financial relationships. The Company did not have any interest rate hedging products as of December 30, 2012. As of December 30, 2012, $50.0 million of the Company’s debt and capital lease obligations of $493.0 million were subject to changes in short-term interest rates. As it relates to the Company’s variable rate debt, assuming no changes in the Company’s financial structure, if market interest rates average 1% more over the next twelve months than the interest rates as of December 30, 2012, interest expense for the next twelve months would increase by approximately $.3 million. This amount was determined by calculating the effect of the hypothetical interest rate on our variable rate debt. This calculated, hypothetical increase in interest expense for the following twelve months may be different from the actual increase in interest expense from a 1% increase in interest rates due to varying interest rate reset dates on the Company’s floating rate debt. Raw Material and Commodity Prices The Company is also subject to commodity price risk arising from price movements for certain commodities included as part of its raw materials. The Company manages this commodity price risk in some cases by entering into contracts with adjustable prices. The Company periodically uses derivative commodity instruments in the management of this risk. The Company estimates that a 10% increase in the market prices of these commodities over the current market prices would cumulatively increase costs during the next 12 months by approximately $23 million assuming no change in volume. In the third quarter of 2012, the Company entered into agreements to hedge a portion of the Company’s 2013 aluminum purchases. The Company paid a fee for these instruments which will be amortized over the corresponding period of the instruments. The Company accounts for its aluminum hedges on a mark-to-market basis with any expense or income being reflected as an adjustment to cost of sales. Effect of Changing Prices The annual rate of inflation in the United States, as measured by year-over-year changes in the consumer price index, was 1.7% in 2012 compared to 3.0% in 2011 and 1.5% in 2010. Inflation in the prices of those commodities important to the Company’s business is reflected in changes in the consumer price index, but commodity prices are volatile and can and have in recent years increased at a faster rate than the rate of inflation as measured by the consumer price index. The principal effect of inflation in both commodity and consumer prices on the Company’s operating results is to increase costs for both cost of sales and selling, delivery and administrative expenses. Although the Company can offset these cost increases by increasing selling prices for its products, consumers may not have the buying power to cover those increased costs and may reduce their volume of purchases of those products. In that event, selling price increases may not be sufficient to offset completely the Company’s cost increases. 55 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, delivery and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense, net Income before taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 $1,614,433 $1,561,239 $1,514,599 960,124 654,309 565,623 88,686 35,338 53,348 21,889 31,459 4,242 931,996 629,243 541,713 87,530 35,979 51,551 19,528 32,023 3,415 873,783 640,816 544,498 96,318 35,127 61,191 21,649 39,542 3,485 Net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated $ 27,217 $ 28,608 $ 36,057 Basic net income per share based on net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2.95 $ 3.11 $ 3.93 Weighted average number of Common Stock shares outstanding . . . . 7,141 7,141 7,141 Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2.95 $ 3.11 $ 3.93 Weighted average number of Class B Common Stock shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,085 2,063 2,040 Diluted net income per share based on net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2.94 $ 3.09 $ 3.91 Weighted average number of Common Stock shares outstanding — assuming dilution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,266 9,244 9,221 Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2.92 $ 3.08 $ 3.90 Weighted average number of Class B Common Stock shares outstanding — assuming dilution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,125 2,103 2,080 See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 56 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME In Thousands Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 31,459 $ 32,023 $ 39,542 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: Ownership share of Southeastern OCI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation adjustment Defined benefit plans: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 (1) 0 2 49 (9) Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (11,618) (12,967) (11,196) Prior service costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 (1) (6) Postretirement benefits plan: Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,181) Prior service costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transition asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (917) 0 (3,369) (1,041) (11) (4,405) (1,084) (15) Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (13,706) (17,387) (16,666) Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,753 14,636 22,876 Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . 4,242 3,415 3,485 Comprehensive income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated $ 13,511 $ 11,221 $ 19,391 See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 57 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS In Thousands (Except Share Data) ASSETS Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable, trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,490 and $1,521, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable, other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leased property under capital leases, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Franchise rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other identifiable intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,399 0 $ 90,758 3,000 103,524 15,521 12,876 65,924 33,068 241,312 307,467 54,150 53,801 520,672 102,049 4,023 105,515 9,300 15,874 66,158 31,607 322,212 302,920 59,804 50,329 520,672 102,049 4,439 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,283,474 $1,362,425 See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 58 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Current liabilities: Current portion of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current portion of obligations under capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable, trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued interest payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pension and postretirement benefit obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Obligations under capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000 5,230 51,651 27,830 75,113 32,428 4,060 216,312 140,965 140,719 118,303 64,351 403,386 $ 120,000 4,574 42,203 34,150 68,177 29,218 5,448 303,770 144,091 138,156 114,302 69,480 403,219 Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,084,036 1,173,018 Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13) Equity: Convertible Preferred Stock, $100.00 par value: Authorized-50,000 shares; Issued-None Nonconvertible Preferred Stock, $100.00 par value: Authorized-50,000 shares; Issued-None Preferred Stock, $.01 par value: Authorized-20,000,000 shares; Issued-None Common Stock, $1.00 par value: Authorized-30,000,000 shares; Issued-10,203,821 shares Class B Common Stock, $1.00 par value: Authorized-10,000,000 shares; Issued-2,716,956 and 2,694,636 shares, respectively Class C Common Stock, $1.00 par value: Authorized-20,000,000 shares; Issued-None Capital in excess of par value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less-Treasury stock, at cost: Common Stock-3,062,374 shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock-628,114 shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total equity of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,204 10,204 2,715 2,693 107,681 170,439 (94,526) 106,201 152,446 (80,820) 196,513 190,724 60,845 409 135,259 64,179 199,438 60,845 409 129,470 59,937 189,407 Total liabilities and equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,283,474 $1,362,425 See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 59 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS In Thousands Cash Flows from Operating Activities Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Impairment/accelerated depreciation of property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . Net gain on property, plant and equipment damaged in flood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of debt costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of deferred gains related to terminated interest rate agreements . . . . . Insurance proceeds received for flood damage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Increase) decrease in current assets less current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase in other noncurrent assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) in other noncurrent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 $ 31,459 $ 32,023 $ 39,542 61,168 416 7,138 633 275 0 2,242 2,623 (1,145) 0 (288) (5,087) (16,261) (1) 61,686 432 7,888 547 0 0 2,330 2,342 (1,221) 0 5,529 (4,563) 2,652 5 58,672 489 (4,906) 1,195 3,665 (892) 2,330 2,223 (1,211) 5,682 1,920 (1,726) 2,788 (15) Total adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,713 77,627 70,214 Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83,172 109,650 109,756 Cash Flows from Investing Activities Additions to property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Insurance proceeds received for property, plant and equipment damaged in flood . . . . Investment in subsidiary net of assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (53,271) 701 0 0 3,000 (53,156) 1,772 0 0 500 (57,798) 1,795 1,418 (32) 1,000 Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (49,570) (50,884) (53,617) Cash Flows from Financing Activities Proceeds from lines of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Borrowing (repayment) under revolving credit facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Excess tax expense from stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Principal payments on capital lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Debt issuance costs paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,000 30,000 (150,000) (9,224) 81 (4,682) 0 (136) 0 0 0 (9,203) 61 (3,839) (716) (183) 0 (15,000) 0 (9,180) 77 (3,846) 0 (88) Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (113,961) (13,880) (28,037) Net increase (decrease) in cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (80,359) 44,886 Cash at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,758 45,872 28,102 17,770 Cash at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,399 $ 90,758 $ 45,872 Significant non-cash investing and financing activities Issuance of Class B Common Stock in connection with stock award . . . . . . . . . . Capital lease obligations incurred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,421 209 $ 1,327 18,632 $ 1,316 0 See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 60 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY In Thousands (Except Share Data) Common Stock Class B Common Stock Capital in Excess of Par Value Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Retained Earnings Treasury Stock Total Equity of CCBCC Noncontrolling Interest Total Equity Balance on Jan. 3, 2010 . . . . . . . $10,204 $2,649 $103,464 $107,995 $(46,767) $(61,254) $116,291 $52,804 $169,095 Revision of prior period (Note 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,831) (1,831) (1,831) Revised beginning balance . . . . . $10,204 $2,649 $103,464 $106,164 $(46,767) $(61,254) $114,460 $52,804 $167,264 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition of noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends paid Common ($1 per share) . . . . . Class B Common ($1 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of 22,320 shares of Class B Common Stock . . . . . Stock compensation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,057 36,057 3,485 39,542 (16,666) (16,666) (16,666) (7,141) (2,039) 22 1,294 77 233 233 (7,141) (2,039) 1,316 77 (7,141) (2,039) 1,316 77 Balance on Jan. 2, 2011 . . . . . . . $10,204 $2,671 $104,835 $133,041 $(63,433) $(61,254) $126,064 $56,522 $182,586 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends paid Common ($1 per share) . . . . . Class B Common ($1 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of 22,320 shares of Class B Common Stock . . . . . Stock compensation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,608 28,608 3,415 32,023 (17,387) (17,387) (17,387) (7,141) (2,062) 22 1,305 61 (7,141) (2,062) 1,327 61 (7,141) (2,062) 1,327 61 Balance on Jan. 1, 2012 . . . . . . . $10,204 $2,693 $106,201 $152,446 $(80,820) $(61,254) $129,470 $59,937 $189,407 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . Cash dividends paid Common ($1 per share) . . . . . Class B Common ($1 per share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of 22,320 shares of Class B Common Stock . . . . . Stock compensation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,217 27,217 4,242 31,459 (13,706) (13,706) (13,706) (7,141) (2,083) 22 1,399 81 (7,141) (2,083) 1,421 81 (7,141) (2,083) 1,421 81 Balance on Dec. 30, 2012 . . . . . $10,204 $2,715 $107,681 $170,439 $(94,526) $(61,254) $135,259 $64,179 $199,438 See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 61 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Significant Accounting Policies Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (the “Company”) produces, markets and distributes nonalcoholic beverages, primarily products of The Coca-Cola Company. The Company operates principally in the southeastern region of the United States and has one reportable segment. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The fiscal years presented are the 52-week periods ended December 30, 2012 (“2012”), January 1, 2012 (“2011”) and January 2, 2011 (“2010”). The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to December 31 of each year. Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership (“Piedmont”) is the Company’s only subsidiary that has a significant noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest income of $4.2 million in 2012, $3.4 million in 2011 and $3.5 million in 2010 are included in net income on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to both the Company and noncontrolling interest are shown on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Noncontrolling interest primarily related to Piedmont totaled $64.2 million and $59.9 million at December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. These amounts are shown as noncontrolling interest in the equity section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current classifications. Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements In connection with the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company identified an error in the treatment of a certain prior year deferred tax asset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This resulted in an understatement of the net noncurrent deferred income tax liability and an overstatement of retained earnings, and therefore equity, for each of the impacted periods. This error affected the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity as presented in each of the quarters of 2012, 2011 and 2010, including the year-end consolidated financial statements for 2011 and 2010. In accordance with accounting guidance presented in ASC 250-10 (SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, Materiality), the Company assessed the materiality of the error and concluded that it was not material to any of the Company’s previously issued financial statements taken as a whole. The Company has revised previously issued financial statements to correct the effect of this error. This revision did not affect the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for any of these periods. Year Ended January 1, 2012 In Thousands As Previously Reported Adjustment Deferred income taxes (noncurrent liability) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total equity of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 142,260 1,171,187(1) 154,277 131,301 191,238 $ 1,831 1,831 (1,831) (1,831) (1,831) (1) Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current classifications. As Revised $ 144,091 1,173,018 152,446 129,470 189,407 62 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Company’s significant accounting policies are as follows: Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in banks and cash equivalents, which are highly liquid debt instruments with maturities of less than 90 days. The Company maintains cash deposits with major banks which from time to time may exceed federally insured limits. The Company periodically assesses the financial condition of the institutions and believes that the risk of any loss is minimal. Credit Risk of Trade Accounts Receivable The Company sells its products to supermarkets, convenience stores and other customers and extends credit, generally without requiring collateral, based on an ongoing evaluation of the customer’s business prospects and financial condition. The Company’s trade accounts receivable are typically collected within approximately 30 days from the date of sale. The Company monitors its exposure to losses on trade accounts receivable and maintains an allowance for potential losses or adjustments. Past due trade accounts receivable balances are written off when the Company’s collection efforts have been unsuccessful in collecting the amount due. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method for finished products and manufacturing materials and on the average cost method for plastic shells, plastic pallets and other inventories. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements on operating leases are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful lives or the term of the lease, including renewal options the Company determines are reasonably assured. Additions and major replacements or betterments are added to the assets at cost. Maintenance and repair costs and minor replacements are charged to expense when incurred. When assets are replaced or otherwise disposed, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the gains or losses, if any, are reflected in the statement of operations. Gains or losses on the disposal of manufacturing equipment and manufacturing facilities are included in cost of sales. Gains or losses on the disposal of all other property, plant and equipment are included in selling, delivery and administrative (“S,D&A”) expenses. Disposals of property, plant and equipment generally occur when it is not cost effective to repair an asset. The Company evaluates the recoverability of the carrying amount of its property, plant and equipment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. These evaluations are performed at a level where independent cash flows may be attributed to either an asset or an asset group. If the Company determines that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group is not recoverable based upon the expected undiscounted future cash flows of the asset or asset group, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the excess of the carrying amounts over the estimated fair value of the long-lived assets. Leased Property Under Capital Leases Leased property under capital leases is depreciated using the straight-line method over the lease term. Internal Use Software The Company capitalizes costs incurred in the development or acquisition of internal use software. The Company expenses costs incurred in the preliminary project planning stage. Costs, such as maintenance and 63 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS training, are also expensed as incurred. Capitalized costs are amortized over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Amortization expense, which is included in depreciation expense, for internal-use software was $7.3 million, $7.0 million and $6.5 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Franchise Rights and Goodwill Under the provisions of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), all business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method and goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized but instead are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if facts and circumstances indicate such assets may be impaired. The only intangible assets the Company classifies as indefinite lived are franchise rights and goodwill. The Company performs its annual impairment test as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each year. For both franchise rights and goodwill, when appropriate, the Company performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the franchise rights or goodwill is below its carrying value. When a quantitative analysis is considered necessary for the annual impairment analysis of franchise rights, the Company utilizes the Greenfield Method to estimate the fair value. The Greenfield Method assumes the Company is starting new, owning only franchise rights, and makes investments required to build an operation comparable to the Company’s current operations. The Company estimates the cash flows required to build a comparable operation and the available future cash flows from these operations. The cash flows are then discounted using an appropriate discount rate. The estimated fair value based upon the discounted cash flows is then compared to the carrying value on an aggregated basis. The Company has determined that it has one reporting unit for purposes of assessing goodwill for potential impairment. When a quantitative analysis is considered necessary for the annual impairment analysis of goodwill, the Company develops an estimated fair value for the reporting unit considering three different approaches: • market value, using the Company’s stock price plus outstanding debt; • discounted cash flow analysis; and • multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization based upon relevant industry data. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit is then compared to its carrying amount including goodwill. If the estimated fair value exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill is considered not impaired, and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount including goodwill exceeds its estimated fair value, the second step of the impairment test is performed to measure the amount of the impairment, if any. In the second step, a comparison is made between book value of goodwill to the implied fair value of goodwill. Implied fair value of goodwill is determined by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to the book value of its net identifiable assets excluding goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is below the book value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized for the difference. The Company uses its overall market capitalization as part of its estimate of fair value of the reporting unit and in assessing the reasonableness of the Company’s internal estimates of fair value. To the extent that actual and projected cash flows decline in the future, or if market conditions deteriorate significantly, the Company may be required to perform an interim impairment analysis that could result in an impairment of franchise rights and goodwill. Other Identifiable Intangible Assets Other identifiable intangible assets primarily represent customer relationships and distribution rights and are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. 64 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans The Company has a noncontributory pension plan covering certain nonunion employees and one noncontributory pension plan covering certain union employees. Costs of the plans are charged to current operations and consist of several components of net periodic pension cost based on various actuarial assumptions regarding future experience of the plans. In addition, certain other union employees are covered by plans provided by their respective union organizations and the Company expenses amounts as paid in accordance with union agreements. The Company recognizes the cost of postretirement benefits, which consist principally of medical benefits, during employees’ periods of active service. Amounts recorded for benefit plans reflect estimates related to interest rates, investment returns, employee turnover and health care costs. The discount rate assumptions used to determine the pension and postretirement benefit obligations are based on yield rates available on double-A bonds as of each plan’s measurement date. On February 22, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to the pension plan covering substantially all nonunion employees to cease further accruals under the plan effective June 30, 2006. Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to operating loss and tax credit carryforwards as well as differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance will be provided against deferred tax assets, if the Company determines it is more likely than not such assets will not ultimately be realized. The Company does not recognize a tax benefit unless it concludes that it is more likely than not that the benefit will be sustained on audit by the taxing authority based solely on the technical merits of the associated tax position. If the recognition threshold is met, the Company recognizes a tax benefit measured at the largest amount of the tax benefit that, in the Company’s judgment, is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized. The Company records interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. Revenue Recognition Revenues are recognized when finished products are delivered to customers and both title and the risks and benefits of ownership are transferred, price is fixed and determinable, collection is reasonably assured and, in the case of full service vending, when cash is collected from the vending machines. Appropriate provision is made for uncollectible accounts. The Company receives service fees from The Coca-Cola Company related to the delivery of fountain syrup products to The Coca-Cola Company’s fountain customers. In addition, the Company receives service fees from The Coca-Cola Company related to the repair of fountain equipment owned by The Coca-Cola Company. The fees received from The Coca-Cola Company for the delivery of fountain syrup products to their customers and the repair of their fountain equipment are recognized as revenue when the respective services are completed. Service revenue represents approximately 1% of net sales. The Company performs freight hauling and brokerage for third parties in addition to delivering its own products. The freight charges are recognized as revenues when the delivery is complete. Freight revenue from third parties represents approximately 1% of net sales. Revenues do not include sales or other taxes collected from customers. 65 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Marketing Programs and Sales Incentives The Company participates in various marketing and sales programs with The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies and arrangements with customers to increase the sale of its products by its customers. Among the programs negotiated with customers are arrangements under which allowances can be earned for attaining agreed-upon sales levels and/or for participating in specific marketing programs. Coupon programs are also developed on a territory-specific basis. The cost of these various marketing included as totaled $58.1 million, $53.0 million and $51.8 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, programs and sales incentives with The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies, deductions to net sales, respectively. Marketing Funding Support The Company receives marketing funding support payments in cash from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies. Payments to the Company for marketing programs to promote the sale of bottle/can volume and fountain syrup volume are recognized in earnings primarily on a per unit basis over the year as product is sold. Payments for periodic programs are recognized in the periods for which they are earned. Under GAAP, cash consideration received by a customer from a vendor is presumed to be a reduction of the prices of the vendor’s products or services and is, therefore, to be accounted for as a reduction of cost of sales in the statements of operations unless those payments are specific reimbursements of costs or payments for services. Payments the Company receives from The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies for marketing funding support are classified as reductions of cost of sales. Derivative Financial Instruments The Company records all derivative instruments in the financial statements at fair value. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to movements in interest rates and certain commodity prices. The use of these financial instruments modifies the Company’s exposure to these risks with the intent of reducing risk over time. The Company does not use financial instruments for trading purposes, nor does it use leveraged financial instruments. Credit risk related to the derivative financial instruments is managed by requiring high credit standards for its counterparties and periodic settlements. Interest Rate Hedges The Company periodically enters into derivative financial instruments. The Company has standardized procedures for evaluating the accounting for financial instruments. These procedures include: • Identifying and matching of the hedging instrument and the hedged item to ensure that significant features coincide such as maturity dates and interest reset dates; • Identifying the nature of the risk being hedged and the Company’s intent for undertaking the hedge; • Assessing the hedging instrument’s effectiveness in offsetting the exposure to changes in the hedged item’s fair value or variability to cash flows attributable to the hedged risk; • Assessing evidence that, at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, it is expected that the hedging relationship will be highly effective in achieving an offsetting change in the fair value or cash flows that are attributable to the hedged risk; and • Maintaining a process to review all hedges on an ongoing basis to ensure continued qualification for hedge accounting. 66 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS To the extent the interest rate agreements meet the specified criteria, they are accounted for as either fair value or cash flow hedges. Changes in the fair values of designated and qualifying fair value hedges are recognized in earnings as offsets to changes in the fair value of the related hedged liabilities. Changes in the fair value of cash flow hedging instruments are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income and are subsequently reclassified to earnings as an adjustment to interest expense in the same periods the forecasted payments affect earnings. Ineffectiveness of a cash flow hedge, defined as the amount by which the change in the value of the hedge does not exactly offset the change in the value of the hedged item, is reflected in current results of operations. The Company evaluates its mix of fixed and floating rate debt on an ongoing basis. Periodically, the Company may terminate an interest rate derivative when the underlying debt remains outstanding in order to achieve its desired fixed/floating rate mix. Upon termination of an interest rate derivative accounted for as a cash flow hedge, amounts reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income are reclassified to earnings consistent with the variability of the cash flows previously hedged, which is generally over the life of the related debt that was hedged. Upon termination of an interest rate derivative accounted for as a fair value hedge, the value of the hedge as recorded on the Company’s balance sheet is eliminated against either the cash received or cash paid for settlement and the fair value adjustment of the related debt is amortized to earnings over the remaining life of the debt instrument as an adjustment to interest expense. Interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are used to hedge the variability of cash flows related to a specific component of the Company’s long-term debt. Interest rate derivatives designated as fair value hedges are used to hedge the fair value of a specific component of the Company’s long-term debt. If the hedged component of long-term debt is repaid or refinanced, the Company generally terminates the related hedge due to the fact the forecasted schedule of payments will not occur or the changes in fair value of the hedged debt will not occur and the derivative will no longer qualify as a hedge. Any gain or loss on the termination of an interest rate derivative related to the repayment or refinancing of long-term debt is recognized currently in the Company’s statement of operations as an adjustment to interest expense. In the event a derivative previously accounted for as a hedge was retained and did not qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the fair value would be recognized in the statement of operations currently as an adjustment to interest expense. Commodity Hedges The Company may use derivative instruments to hedge some or all of the Company’s projected diesel fuel and unleaded gasoline purchases (used in the Company’s delivery fleet and other vehicles) and aluminum purchases. The Company generally pays a fee for these instruments which is amortized over the corresponding period of the instrument. The Company accounts for its commodity hedges on a mark-to-market basis with any expense or income reflected as an adjustment of related costs which are included in either cost of sales or S,D&A expenses. Risk Management Programs The Company uses various insurance structures to manage its workers’ compensation, auto liability, medical and other insurable risks. These structures consist of retentions, deductibles, limits and a diverse group of insurers that serve to strategically transfer and mitigate the financial impact of losses. The Company uses commercial insurance for claims as a risk reduction strategy to minimize catastrophic losses. Losses are accrued using assumptions and procedures followed in the insurance industry, adjusted for company-specific history and expectations. Cost of Sales Cost of sales includes the following: raw material costs, manufacturing labor, manufacturing overhead including depreciation expense, manufacturing warehousing costs and shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution centers. 67 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Selling, Delivery and Administrative Expenses S,D&A expenses include the following: sales management labor costs, distribution costs from sales distribution centers to customer locations, sales distribution center warehouse costs, depreciation expense related to sales centers, delivery vehicles and cold drink equipment, point-of-sale expenses, advertising expenses, cold drink equipment repair costs, amortization of intangibles and administrative support labor and operating costs such as treasury, legal, information services, accounting, internal control services, human resources and executive management costs. Shipping and Handling Costs Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution centers are included in cost of sales. Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from sales distribution centers to customer locations are included in S,D&A expenses and were $200.0 million, $191.9 million and $187.2 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company recorded delivery fees in net sales of $7.0 million, $7.1 million and $7.5 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These fees are used to offset a portion of the Company’s delivery and handling costs. Stock Compensation with Contingent Vesting On April 29, 2008, the stockholders of the Company approved a Performance Unit Award Agreement for J. Frank Harrison, III, the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, consisting of 400,000 performance units (“Units”). Each Unit represents the right to receive one share of the Company’s Class B Common Stock, subject to certain terms and conditions. The Units are subject to vesting in annual increments over a ten-year period starting in fiscal year 2009. The number of Units that vest each year will equal the product of 40,000 multiplied by the overall goal achievement factor (not to exceed 100%) under the Company’s Annual Bonus Plan. Each annual 40,000 unit tranche has an independent performance requirement, as it is not established until the Company’s Annual Bonus Plan targets are approved each year by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. As a result, each 40,000 unit tranche is considered to have its own service inception date, grant-date and requisite service period. The Company’s Annual Bonus Plan targets, which establish the performance requirements for the Performance Unit Award Agreement, are approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in the first quarter of each year. The Performance Unit Award Agreement does not entitle Mr. Harrison, III to participate in dividends or voting rights until each installment has vested and the shares are issued. Mr. Harrison, III may satisfy tax withholding requirements in whole or in part by requiring the Company to settle in cash such number of units otherwise payable in Class B Common Stock to meet the maximum statutory tax withholding requirements. The Company recognizes compensation expense over the requisite service period (one fiscal year) based on the Company’s stock price at the end of each accounting period, unless the achievement of the performance requirement for the fiscal year is considered unlikely. See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on Mr. Harrison, III’s stock compensation program. Net Income Per Share The Company applies the two-class method for calculating and presenting net income per share. The two- class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method: (a) Income from continuing operations (“net income”) is reduced by the amount of dividends declared in the current period for each class of stock and by the contractual amount of dividends that must be paid for the current period. 68 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (b) The remaining earnings (“undistributed earnings”) are allocated to Common Stock and Class B Common Stock to the extent that each security may share in earnings as if all of the earnings for the period had been distributed. The total earnings allocated to each security is determined by adding together the amount allocated for dividends and the amount allocated for a participation feature. (c) The total earnings allocated to each security is then divided by the number of outstanding shares of the security to which the earnings are allocated to determine the earnings per share for the security. (d) Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) data are presented for each class of common stock. In applying the two-class method, the Company determined that undistributed earnings should be allocated equally on a per share basis between the Common Stock and Class B Common Stock due to the aggregate participation rights of the Class B Common Stock (i.e., the voting and conversion rights) and the Company’s history of paying dividends equally on a per share basis on the Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. Under the Company’s certificate of incorporation, the Board of Directors may declare dividends on Common Stock without declaring equal or any dividends on the Class B Common Stock. Notwithstanding this provision, Class B Common Stock has voting and conversion rights that allow the Class B Common Stock to participate equally on a per share basis with the Common Stock. The Class B Common Stock is entitled to 20 votes per share and the Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share with respect to each matter to be voted upon by the stockholders of the Company. Except as otherwise required by law, the holders of the Class B Common Stock and Common Stock vote together as a single class on all matters submitted to the Company’s stockholders, including the election of the Board of Directors. As a result, the holders of the Class B Common Stock control approximately 85% of the total voting power of the stockholders of the Company and control the election of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has declared and the Company has paid dividends on the Class B Common Stock and Common Stock and each class of common stock has participated equally in all dividends declared by the Board of Directors and paid by the Company since 1994. The Class B Common Stock conversion rights allow the Class B Common Stock to participate in dividends equally with the Common Stock. The Class B Common Stock is convertible into Common Stock on a one-for-one per share basis at any time at the option of the holder. Accordingly, the holders of the Class B Common Stock can participate equally in any dividends declared on the Common Stock by exercising their conversion rights. As a result of the Class B Common Stock’s aggregated participation rights, the Company has determined that undistributed earnings should be allocated equally on a per share basis to the Common Stock and Class B Common Stock under the two-class method. Basic EPS excludes potential common shares that were dilutive and is computed by dividing net income available for common stockholders by the weighted average number of Common and Class B Common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS for Common Stock and Class B Common Stock gives effect to all securities representing potential common shares that were dilutive and outstanding during the period. 2. Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership On July 2, 1993, the Company and The Coca-Cola Company formed Piedmont to distribute and market nonalcoholic beverages primarily in portions of North Carolina and South Carolina. The Company provides a portion of the nonalcoholic beverage products to Piedmont at cost and receives a fee for managing the operations of Piedmont pursuant to a management agreement. These intercompany transactions are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. Noncontrolling interest as of December 30, 2012, January 1, 2012 and January 2, 2011 primarily represents the portion of Piedmont which is owned by The Coca-Cola Company. The Coca-Cola Company’s interest in Piedmont was 22.7% in all periods reported. 69 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Company currently provides financing to Piedmont under an agreement that expires on December 31, 2015. Piedmont pays the Company interest on its borrowings at the Company’s average cost of funds plus 0.50%. There were no amounts outstanding under this agreement at December 30, 2012. The loan balance was $17.8 million at January 1, 2012. 3. Inventories Inventories were summarized as follows: In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Finished products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $36,445 $33,394 Manufacturing materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plastic shells, plastic pallets and other inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,019 18,460 14,061 18,703 Total inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $65,924 $66,158 4. Property, Plant and Equipment The principal categories and estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment were as follows: In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Estimated Useful Lives Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 12,442 $ 12,537 Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118,556 118,603 8-50 years Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140,963 136,113 5-20 years Transportation equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163,586 152,451 4-20 years Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,580 41,170 3-10 years Cold drink dispensing equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314,863 305,308 5-15 years Leasehold and land improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Software for internal use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71,956 74,907 8,264 74,500 5-20 years 70,648 3-10 years 3,796 Total property, plant and equipment, at cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 947,117 915,126 Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 639,650 612,206 Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $307,467 $302,920 Depreciation and amortization expense was $61.2 million, $61.7 million and $58.7 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These amounts included amortization expense for leased property under capital leases. During 2012, the Company performed a review of property, plant and equipment. As a result of this review, $.3 million was recorded to impairment expense in cost of sales for manufacturing equipment. During 2011, the Company performed a review of property, plant and equipment and determined there was no impairment to be recorded. During 2010, the Company performed a review of property, plant and equipment. As a result of this review, $.9 million was recorded to impairment expense for five Company-owned sales distribution centers held-for-sale. The Company also recorded accelerated depreciation of $.5 million for certain other property, plant and equipment which was replaced in the first quarter of 2011. During 2010, the Company also determined the warehouse operations in Sumter, South Carolina would be relocated to other facilities and recorded impairment and 70 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS accelerated depreciation of $2.2 million for the value of equipment and real estate related to the Sumter, South Carolina property. The impairment expense/accelerated depreciation was recorded in S,D&A expenses. 5. Leased Property Under Capital Leases Leased property under capital leases was summarized as follows: In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Estimated Useful Lives Leased property under capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $94,180 $95,509 3-20 years Less: Accumulated amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,030 35,705 Leased property under capital leases, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $54,150 $59,804 As of December 30, 2012, real estate represented $53.9 million of the leased property under capital leases, net and $36.6 million of this real estate is leased from related parties as described in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s outstanding lease obligations for capital leases were $69.6 million and $74.1 million as of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012. 6. Franchise Rights and Goodwill Franchise rights and goodwill were summarized as follows: In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Franchise rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $520,672 $520,672 Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102,049 102,049 Total franchise rights and goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $622,721 $622,721 The Company performed its annual impairment test of franchise rights and goodwill as of the first day of the fourth quarter of 2012, 2011 and 2010 and determined there was no impairment of the carrying value of these assets. There has been no impairment of franchise rights or goodwill since acquisition. There was no activity for franchise rights or goodwill in 2012 or 2011. 7. Other Identifiable Intangible Assets Other identifiable intangible assets were summarized as follows: In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Estimated Useful Lives Other identifiable intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $8,557 $8,557 1-20 years Less: Accumulated amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,534 4,118 Other identifiable intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,023 $4,439 Other identifiable intangible assets primarily represent customer relationships and distribution rights. Amortization expense related to other identifiable intangible assets was $.4 million, $.4 million and $.5 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Assuming no impairment of these other identifiable intangible assets, amortization expense in future years based upon recorded amounts as of December 30, 2012 will be $.3 million each year for 2013 through 2017. 71 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 8. Other Accrued Liabilities Other accrued liabilities were summarized as follows: In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Accrued marketing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,506 $16,743 Accrued insurance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,458 18,880 Accrued taxes (other than income taxes) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employee benefit plan accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Checks and transfers yet to be presented for payment from zero balance cash accounts . . . . . . All other accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,910 16,988 11,962 10,289 1,636 12,348 8,608 9,962 Total other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $75,113 $68,177 9. Debt Debt was summarized as follows: In Thousands Maturity Interest Rate Interest Paid Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Revolving credit facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Line of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Senior Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Senior Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Senior Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Senior Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unamortized discount on Senior Notes . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 2013 2012 2015 2016 2019 2019 Less: Current portion of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Variable Varies Variable Varies $ 30,000 $ 20,000 0 0 5.00% Semi-annually 0 150,000 5.30% Semi-annually 100,000 100,000 5.00% Semi-annually 164,757 164,757 7.00% Semi-annually 110,000 (1,371) 110,000 (1,538) 423,386 523,219 20,000 120,000 $403,386 $403,219 The principal maturities of debt outstanding on December 30, 2012 were as follows: In Thousands 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 20,000 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 100,000 194,757 0 Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108,629 Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $423,386 72 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Company has obtained the majority of its long-term debt financing, other than capital leases, from the public markets. As of December 30, 2012, the Company’s total outstanding balance of debt and capital lease obligations was $493.0 million of which $373.4 million was financed through publicly offered debt. The Company had capital lease obligations of $69.6 million as of December 30, 2012. The Company mitigates its financing risk by using multiple financial institutions and enters into credit arrangements only with institutions with investment grade credit ratings. The Company monitors counterparty credit ratings on an ongoing basis. On September 21, 2011, the Company entered into a $200 million five-year unsecured revolving credit agreement (“$200 million facility”) replacing the Company’s previous $200 million five-year unsecured revolving credit facility. The $200 million facility has a scheduled maturity date of September 21, 2016 and up to $25 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit. Borrowings under the agreement bear interest at a floating base rate or a floating Eurodollar rate plus an interest rate spread, dependent on the Company’s credit rating at the time of borrowing. The Company must pay an annual facility fee of .175% of the lenders’ aggregate commitments under the facility. The $200 million facility contains two financial covenants: a cash flow/fixed charges ratio (“fixed charges coverage ratio”) and a funded indebtedness/cash flow ratio (“operating cash flow ratio”), each as defined in the credit agreement. The fixed charges coverage ratio requires the Company to maintain a consolidated cash flow to fixed charges ratio of 1.5 to 1.0 or higher. The operating cash flow ratio requires the Company to maintain a debt to operating cash flow ratio of 6.0 to 1.0 or lower. The Company is currently in compliance with these covenants. These covenants do not currently, and the Company does not anticipate they will, restrict its liquidity or capital resources. On December 30, 2012, the Company had $30.0 million of outstanding borrowings on the $200 million facility and had $170 million available to meet its cash requirements. On January 1, 2012, the Company had no outstanding borrowings on the $200 million facility. On February 10, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement for an uncommitted line of credit. Under this agreement, which is still in place, the Company may borrow up to a total of $20 million for periods of 7 days, 30 days, 60 days or 90 days at the discretion of the participating bank. On December 30, 2012, the Company had $20.0 million outstanding under the uncommitted line of credit at a weighted average interest rate of .94%. On January 1, 2012, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the uncommitted line of credit. The Company used a combination of available cash on hand, borrowings on the uncommitted line of credit and borrowings under the $200 million facility to repay $150 million of the Company’s Senior Notes that matured in November 2012. As of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the Company had a weighted average interest rate of 5.9% and 6.0%, respectively, for its outstanding debt and capital lease obligations. The Company’s overall weighted average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations was 6.1%, 6.0% and 5.9% for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of December 30, 2012, $50.0 million of the Company’s debt and capital lease obligations of $493.0 million were subject to changes in short-term interest rates. The Company’s public debt is not subject to financial covenants but does limit the incurrence of certain liens and encumbrances as well as the incurrence of indebtedness by the Company’s subsidiaries in excess of certain amounts. All of the outstanding long-term debt has been issued by the Company with none being issued by any of the Company’s subsidiaries. There are no guarantees of the Company’s debt. 10. Derivative Financial Instruments Interest As of December 30, 2012, the Company had $0.6 million in gains from terminated interest rate swap agreements to be amortized over the next 27 months. 73 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Unamortized gains from terminated interest rate swap agreements and forward interest rate agreements are presented in accrued interest payable (current) and other liabilities (noncurrent) on the balance sheet. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company amortized deferred gains related to previously terminated interest rate swap agreements and forward interest rate agreements, which reduced interest expense by $1.1 million, $1.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Interest expense will be reduced by the amortization of these deferred gains in 2013 through 2015 as follows: $0.5 million, $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The Company had no interest rate swap agreements outstanding at December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012. Commodities The Company is subject to the risk of increased costs arising from adverse changes in certain commodity prices. In the normal course of business, the Company manages these risks through a variety of strategies, including the use of derivative instruments. The Company does not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value as either assets or liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. These derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP and are used as “economic hedges” to manage certain commodity price risk. Derivative instruments held are marked to market on a monthly basis and recognized in earnings consistent with the expense classification of the underlying hedged item. Settlements of derivative agreements are included in cash flows from operating activities on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company uses several different financial institutions for commodity derivative instruments, to minimize the concentration of credit risk. While the Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by these parties. The Company has master agreements with the counterparties to its derivative financial agreements that provide for net settlement of derivative transactions. The Company periodically uses derivative instruments to hedge part or all of its requirements for diesel fuel and aluminum. In the third quarter of 2012, the Company entered into agreements to hedge a portion of the Company’s 2013 aluminum purchases. The following summarizes 2012, 2011 and 2010 pre-tax changes in the fair value of the Company’s commodity derivative financial instruments and the classification, either as cost of sales or S,D&A expenses, of such changes in the consolidated statements of operations. In Thousands Classification of Gain (Loss) 2012 2011 2010 Commodity hedges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S,D&A expenses Commodity hedges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 500 $ (171) $(1,445) (3,786) (6,666) $500 $(6,837) $(5,231) Fiscal Year The following summarizes the fair values and classification in the consolidated balance sheets of derivative instruments held by the Company: In Thousands Assets Balance Sheet Classification Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Commodity hedges at fair market value . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 500 Unamortized cost of commodity hedging agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 562 $1,062 $0 0 $0 74 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following table summarizes the Company’s outstanding commodity derivative agreements as of December 30, 2012: In Millions Notional Amount Latest Maturity Commodity hedging agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12.0 June 2013 There were no outstanding commodity derivative agreements as of January 1, 2012. 11. Fair Values of Financial Instruments The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair values of its financial instruments: Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate carrying values due to the short maturity of these items. Public Debt Securities The fair values of the Company’s public debt securities are based on estimated current market prices. Non-Public Variable Rate Debt The carrying amounts of the Company’s variable rate borrowings approximate their fair values. Deferred Compensation Plan Assets/Liabilities The fair values of deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities, which are held in mutual funds, are based upon the quoted market value of the securities held within the mutual funds. Derivative Financial Instruments The fair values for the Company’s commodity hedging agreements are based on current settlement values. The fair values of the commodity hedging agreements at each balance sheet date represent the estimated amounts the Company would have received or paid upon termination of these agreements. Credit risk related to the derivative financial instruments is managed by requiring high standards for its counterparties and periodic settlements. The Company considers nonperformance risk in determining the fair value of derivative financial instruments. The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s debt, deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities and derivative financial instruments were as follows: In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value Public debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(373,386) $(426,050) $(523,219) $(576,127) Deferred compensation plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,011 13,011 10,709 10,709 Deferred compensation plan liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (13,011) (13,011) (10,709) (10,709) Commodity hedging agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500 500 Non-public variable rate debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 The fair value of the commodity hedging agreements at December 30, 2012 represented the estimated amount the Company would have received upon termination of these agreements. 75 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS GAAP requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories: Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. The fair value estimates of the Company’s debt are classified as Level 2. Public debt securities are valued using quoted market prices of the debt or debt with similar characteristics. The carrying amount of the Company’s variable rate debt approximates fair value due to the variable interest rates with short reset periods. The following table summarizes, by assets and liabilities, the valuation of the Company’s deferred compensation plan and commodity hedging agreements: In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Level 1 Level 2 Level 1 Level 2 Assets Deferred compensation plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commodity hedging agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liabilities Deferred compensation plan liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,011 0 $ 0 500 $10,709 0 13,011 0 10,709 $0 0 0 The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain executives and other highly compensated employees. The investment assets are held in mutual funds. The fair value of the mutual funds is based on the quoted market value of the securities held within the funds (Level 1). The related deferred compensation liability represents the fair value of the investment assets. The Company’s commodity hedging agreements were based upon rates from public commodity exchanges that are observable and quoted periodically over the full term of the agreements and are considered Level 2 items. The Company does not have Level 3 assets or liabilities. Also, there were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 for 2012, 2011 or 2010. 12. Other Liabilities Other liabilities were summarized as follows: In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Accruals for executive benefit plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other $101,220 17,083 $ 96,242 18,060 Total other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $118,303 $114,302 The accruals for executive benefit plans relate to certain benefit programs for eligible executives of the Company. These benefit programs are primarily the Supplemental Savings Incentive Plan (“Supplemental Savings Plan”), the Officer Retention Plan (“Retention Plan”) and a Long-Term Performance Plan (“Performance Plan”). Pursuant to the Supplemental Savings Plan, as amended, eligible participants may elect to defer a portion of their annual salary and bonus. Participants are immediately vested in all deferred contributions they make and become fully vested in Company contributions upon completion of five years of service, termination of employment due to death, retirement or a change in control. Participant deferrals and Company contributions made in years prior to 2006 are deemed invested in either a fixed benefit option or certain investment funds specified by the Company. Beginning in 2010, the Company may elect at its discretion to match up to 50% of the first 6% of 76 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS salary (excluding bonuses) deferred by the participant. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company matched up to 50% of the first 6% of salary (excluding bonus) deferred by the participant. The Company may also make discretionary contributions to participants’ accounts. The long-term liability under this plan was $61.0 million and $58.1 million as of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. The current liability under this plan was $5.3 million and $4.8 million as of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. Under the Retention Plan, as amended effective January 1, 2007, eligible participants may elect to receive an annuity payable in equal monthly installments over a 10, 15 or 20-year period commencing at retirement or, in certain instances, upon termination of employment. The benefits under the Retention Plan increase with each year of participation as set forth in an agreement between the participant and the Company. Benefits under the Retention Plan are 50% vested until age 50. After age 50, the vesting percentage increases by an additional 5% each year until the benefits are fully vested at age 60. The long-term liability under this plan was $36.3 million and $33.2 million as of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. The current liability under this plan was $1.8 million and $2.2 million as of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012. Under the Performance Plan, adopted as of January 1, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors establishes dollar amounts to which a participant shall be entitled upon attainment of the applicable performance measures. Bonus awards under the Performance Plan are made based on the relative achievement of performance measures in terms of the Company-sponsored objectives or objectives related to the performance of the individual participants or of the subsidiary, division, department, region or function in which the participant is employed. The long-term liability under this plan was $3.1 million and $4.1 million as of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. The current liability under this plan was $4.3 million and $3.6 million as of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. 13. Commitments and Contingencies Rental expense incurred for noncancellable operating leases was $5.9 million, $5.2 million and $5.0 million during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. See Note 5 and Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding leased property under capital leases. The Company leases office and warehouse space, machinery and other equipment under noncancellable operating lease agreements which expire at various dates through 2027. These leases generally contain scheduled rent increases or escalation clauses, renewal options, or in some cases, purchase options. The Company leases certain warehouse space and other equipment under capital lease agreements which expire at various dates through 2026. These leases contain scheduled rent increases or escalation clauses. Amortization of assets recorded under capital leases is included in depreciation expense. 77 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following is a summary of future minimum lease payments for all capital leases and noncancellable operating leases as of December 30, 2012. In Thousands Capital Leases Operating Leases 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10,180 9,928 10,031 10,131 10,291 44,845 $ 5,974 5,420 4,516 3,732 2,970 18,234 Total $ 16,154 15,348 14,547 13,863 13,261 63,079 Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95,406 $40,846 $136,252 Less: Amounts representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,825 Present value of minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Current portion of obligations under capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69,581 5,230 Long-term portion of obligations under capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $64,351 Future minimum lease payments for noncancellable operating leases in the preceding table include renewal options the Company has determined to be reasonably assured. In the first quarter of 2011, the Company entered into capital leases for two sales distribution centers. Each lease has a term of 15 years. The capitalized value for the two leases was $11.3 million and $7.3 million, respectively. The Company is a member of South Atlantic Canners, Inc. (“SAC”), a manufacturing cooperative from which it is obligated to purchase 17.5 million cases of finished product on an annual basis through May 2014. The (“Southeastern”), a plastic bottle manufacturing Company is also a member of Southeastern Container cooperative, from which it is obligated to purchase at least 80% of its requirements of plastic bottles for certain designated territories. See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information concerning SAC and Southeastern. The Company guarantees a portion of SAC’s and Southeastern’s debt. The amounts guaranteed were $35.9 million and $38.3 million as of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. The Company holds no assets as collateral against these guarantees, the fair value of which was immaterial. The guarantees relate to debt and lease obligations of SAC and Southeastern, which resulted primarily from the purchase of production equipment and facilities. These guarantees expire at various times through 2021. The members of both cooperatives consist solely of Coca-Cola bottlers. The Company does not anticipate either of these cooperatives will fail to fulfill their commitments. The Company further believes each of these cooperatives has sufficient assets, including production equipment, facilities and working capital, and the ability to adjust selling prices of its products to adequately mitigate the risk of material loss from the Company’s guarantees. In the event either of these cooperatives fail to fulfill their commitments under the related debt, the Company would be responsible for payments to the lenders up to the level of the guarantees. If these cooperatives had borrowed up to their aggregate borrowing capacity, the Company’s maximum exposure under these guarantees on December 30, 2012 would have been $23.9 million for SAC and $25.3 million for Southeastern and the Company’s maximum total exposure, including its equity investment, would have been $28.0 million for SAC and $44.8 million for Southeastern. The Company has been purchasing plastic bottles from Southeastern and finished products from SAC for more than ten years and has never had to pay against these guarantees. The Company has an equity ownership in each of the entities in addition to the guarantees of certain indebtedness and records its investment in each under the equity method. As of December 30, 2012, SAC had total 78 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS assets of approximately $46 million and total debt of approximately $22 million. SAC had total revenues for 2012 of approximately $183 million. As of December 30, 2012, Southeastern had total assets of approximately $354 million and total debt of approximately $161 million. Southeastern had total revenue for 2012 of approximately $720 million. The Company has standby letters of credit, primarily related to its property and casualty insurance programs. On December 30, 2012, these letters of credit totaled $20.8 million. The Company was required to maintain $4.5 million of restricted cash for letters of credit beginning in the second quarter of 2009 which was reduced to $3.5 million in the second quarter of 2010 and to $3.0 million in the second quarter of 2011. The requirement to maintain restricted cash for these letters of credit was eliminated in the first quarter of 2012. The Company participates in long-term marketing contractual arrangements with certain prestige properties, athletic venues and other locations. The future payments related to these contractual arrangements as of December 30, 2012 amounted to $36.0 million and expire at various dates through 2022. During May 2010, Nashville, Tennessee experienced a severe rain storm which caused extensive flood damage in the area. The Company has a production/sales distribution facility located in the flooded area. Due to damage incurred during this flood, the Company recorded a loss of approximately $.2 million on uninsured cold drink equipment. This loss was offset by gains of approximately $1.1 million for the excess of insurance proceeds received as compared to the net book value of equipment damaged as a result of the flood. In 2010, the Company received $7.1 million in insurance proceeds related to insured losses from the flood. All receivables were recorded for insured losses during fiscal 2010 and were collected in 2010. The Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings which have arisen in the ordinary course of its business. Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of these claims and legal proceedings, management believes the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, cash flows or results of operations of the Company. No material amount of loss in excess of recorded amounts is believed to be reasonably possible as a result of these claims and legal proceedings. The Company is subject to audit by tax authorities in jurisdictions where it conducts business. These audits may result in assessments that are subsequently resolved with the authorities or potentially through the courts. Management believes the Company has adequately provided for any assessments that are likely to result from these audits; however, final assessments, if any, could be different than the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements. 79 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 14. Income Taxes The current income tax provision represents the estimated amount of income taxes paid or payable for the year, as well as changes in estimates from prior years. The deferred income tax provision represents the change in deferred tax liabilities and assets. The following table presents the significant components of the provision for income taxes for 2012, 2011 and 2010. In Thousands Current: Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,871 $ 9,295 $25,988 State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,880 2,345 567 Total current provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,751 $11,640 $26,555 Deferred: Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,667 $ 6,636 $ (6,695) State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,471 1,252 1,789 Total deferred provision (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,138 $ 7,888 $ (4,906) Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $21,889 $19,528 $21,649 The Company’s effective income tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes, for 2012, 2011 and 2010 was 41.0%, 37.9% and 35.4%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes minus net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, for 2012, 2011 and 2010 was 44.6%, 40.6% and 37.5%, respectively. The following table provides a reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory federal rate to actual income tax expense. In Thousands Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Statutory expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $18,672 $18,163 $21,429 State income taxes, net of federal benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,191 2,260 2,669 Noncontrolling interest – Piedmont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,694) (1,479) (1,385) Adjustments for uncertain tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valuation allowance change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 761 1,767 (221) 445 (985) (56) Manufacturing deduction benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,330) (1,190) (1,995) Meals and entertainment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,184 338 1,113 437 1,008 964 Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $21,889 $19,528 $21,649 As of December 30, 2012, the Company had $5.5 million of uncertain tax positions, including accrued interest, of which $3.0 million would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. As of January 1, 2012, the Company had $4.7 million of uncertain tax positions, including accrued interest, of which $2.3 million would affect the Company’s effective rate if recognized. While it is expected that the amount of uncertain tax positions may change in the next 12 months, the Company does not expect such change would have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements. 80 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the total amounts of uncertain tax positions (excludes accrued interest) is as follows: In Thousands Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Gross uncertain tax positions at the beginning of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,281 $4,386 $ 4,649 Increase as a result of tax positions taken during a prior period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase as a result of tax positions taken in the current period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315 538 28 641 0 769 Reduction as a result of the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations . . . . . . . (184) (774) (1,032) Gross uncertain tax positions at the end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4,950 $4,281 $ 4,386 The Company records liabilities for uncertain tax positions related to certain income tax positions. These liabilities reflect the Company’s best estimate of the ultimate income tax liability based on currently known facts and information. Material changes in facts or information as well as the expiration of statute and/or settlements with individual tax jurisdictions may result in material adjustments to these estimates in the future. The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the Company had $.5 million and $.4 million, respectively, of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions. Income tax expense included interest expense of $.1 million in 2012, interest credit of $15,000 in 2011 and interest credit of $.5 million in 2010 primarily due to adjustments in the liability for uncertain tax positions. In the third quarter of 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company reduced its liability for uncertain tax positions by $.2 million, $.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The net effect of the adjustments was a decrease to income tax expense in 2012, 2011 and 2010 by $.2 million, $.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The reduction of the liability for uncertain tax positions during these years was mainly due to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 include provisions that will reduce the tax benefits available to employers that receive Medicare Part D subsidies. As a result, during the first quarter of 2010, the Company recorded tax expense totaling $.5 million related to changes made to the tax deductibility of Medicare Part D subsidies. The American Taxpayer Relief Act (“Act”) was signed into law on January 2, 2013. The Act approved a retroactive extension of certain favorable business and energy tax provisions that had expired at the end of 2011 that are applicable to the Company. The financial impact of these retroactive extensions will be reflected in the Company’s first quarter 2013 income taxes. The Company does not expect the provisions to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Tax years from 2009 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service, and various tax years from 1994 remain open to examination by certain state tax jurisdictions to which the Company is subject due to loss carryforwards. The Company’s income tax assets and liabilities are subject to adjustment in future periods based on the Company’s ongoing evaluations of such assets and liabilities and new information that becomes available to the Company. 81 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Deferred income taxes are recorded based upon temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and available net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Temporary differences and carryforwards that comprised deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows: In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 124,661 $ 123,995 Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment in Piedmont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Debt exchange premium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72,953 41,985 1,585 10,750 76,758 41,504 2,099 9,511 Deferred income tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251,934 253,867 Net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Postretirement benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital lease agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5,718) (39,518) (27,601) (6,042) (5,527) (38,398) (25,666) (5,567) Pension (nonunion) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (29,116) (29,412) Pension (union) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3,395) (7,520) (3,550) (8,006) Deferred income tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (118,910) (116,126) Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,231 1,464 Total deferred income tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136,255 139,205 Net current income tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4,710) (4,886) Net noncurrent deferred income tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140,965 $ 144,091 Note: Net current income tax asset from the table is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Valuation allowances are recognized on deferred tax assets if the Company believes that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company believes the majority of the deferred tax assets will be realized due to the reversal of certain significant temporary differences and anticipated future taxable income from operations. The valuation allowance of $3.2 million as of December 30, 2012 and $1.5 million as of January 1, 2012, respectively, was established primarily for certain net operating loss carryforwards which expire in varying amounts through 2031. 82 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 15. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Accumulated other comprehensive loss is comprised of adjustments relative to the Company’s pension and postretirement medical benefit plans, foreign currency translation adjustments required for a subsidiary of the Company that performs data analysis and provides consulting services outside the United States and the Company’s share of Southeastern’s other comprehensive loss. A summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss is as follows: In Thousands Net pension activity: Losses During the Period Reclassification to Income Jan. 1, 2012 Pre-tax Activity Tax Effect Pre-tax Activity Tax Effect Dec. 30, 2012 Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(64,789) $(21,979) $ 8,651 $ 2,822 $(1,112) $(76,407) Prior service costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (44) 0 0 17 (6) (33) Net postretirement benefits activity: Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (21,244) (4,287) 1,687 2,339 (920) (22,425) Prior service costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,251 Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . 6 0 (1) 0 0 (1,513) 0 596 0 4,334 5 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(80,820) $(26,267) $10,338 $ 3,665 $(1,442) $(94,526) In Thousands Net pension activity: Losses During the Period Reclassification to Income Jan. 2, 2011 Pre-tax Activity Tax Effect Pre-tax Activity Tax Effect Jan. 1, 2012 Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(51,822) $(23,516) $ 9,257 $ 2,130 $ (838) $(64,789) Prior service costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (43) (20) 8 18 (7) (44) Net postretirement benefits activity: Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (17,875) (7,900) 3,109 2,345 (923) (21,244) Prior service costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,292 Transition asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . 11 4 0 0 4 0 0 (2) (1,717) 676 5,251 (18) 0 7 0 0 6 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(63,433) $(31,432) $12,372 $ 2,758 $(1,085) $(80,820) 83 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Losses During the Period Reclassification to Income Jan. 3, 2010 Pre-tax Activity Tax Effect Pre-tax Activity Tax Effect Jan. 2, 2011 In Thousands Net pension activity: Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(40,626) $(24,146) $ 9,472 $ 5,723 $(2,245) $(51,822) Prior service costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (37) (25) 10 15 (6) (43) Net postretirement benefits activity: Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (13,470) (9,539) 3,756 1,503 (125) (17,875) Prior service costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,376 Transition asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ownership share of Southeastern OCI . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . 26 (49) 13 0 0 81 (15) 0 0 (32) 6 (1,784) (25) 0 0 700 10 0 0 6,292 11 0 4 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(46,767) $(33,644) $13,212 $ 5,432 $(1,666) $(63,433) 16. Capital Transactions The Company has two classes of common stock outstanding, Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. The Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Marketsm under the symbol COKE. There is no established public trading market for the Class B Common Stock. Shares of the Class B Common Stock are convertible on a share-for-share basis into shares of Common Stock at any time at the option of the holders of Class B Common Stock. No cash dividend or dividend of property or stock other than stock of the Company, as specifically described in the Company’s certificate of incorporation, may be declared and paid on the Class B Common Stock unless an equal or greater dividend is declared and paid on the Common Stock. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, dividends of $1.00 per share were declared and paid on both Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share and each share of Class B Common Stock is entitled to 20 votes per share at all meetings of shareholders. Except as otherwise required by law, holders of the Common Stock and Class B Common Stock vote together as a single class on all matters brought before the Company’s stockholders. In the event of liquidation, there is no preference between the two classes of common stock. Compensation expense for the Performance Unit Award Agreement recognized in 2012 was $2.6 million, which was based upon a share price of $65.58 on December 28, 2012 (the last trading date prior to December 30, 2012). Compensation expense for the Performance Unit Award Agreement recognized in 2011 was $2.3 million which was based upon a share price of $58.55 on December 30, 2011. Compensation expense for the Performance Unit Award Agreement recognized in 2010 was $2.2 million which was based upon a share price of $55.58 on December 31, 2010. On March 5, 2013, March 6, 2012 and March 8, 2011, the Compensation Committee determined that 40,000 shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock should be issued in each year pursuant to a Performance Unit Award Agreement to J. Frank Harrison, III, in connection with his services in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. As permitted under the terms of the Performance Unit Award Agreement, 19,880, 17,680 and 17,680 of such shares were settled in cash in 2013, to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of the 2012 and 2011, respectively, performance units. 84 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The increase in the number of shares outstanding in 2012, 2011 and 2010 was due to the issuance of 22,320 shares of Class B Common Stock related to the Performance Unit Award Agreement in each year, respectively. 17. Benefit Plans Pension Plans Retirement benefits under the two Company-sponsored pension plans are based on the employee’s length of service, average compensation over the five consecutive years which gives the highest average compensation and the average of the Social Security taxable wage base during the 35-year period before a participant reaches Social Security retirement age. Contributions to the plans are based on the projected unit credit actuarial funding method and are limited to the amounts currently deductible for income tax purposes. On February 22, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to the principal Company-sponsored pension plan covering nonunion employees to cease further benefit accruals under the plan effective June 30, 2006. The following tables set forth pertinent information for the two Company-sponsored pension plans: Changes in Projected Benefit Obligation In Thousands Fiscal Year 2012 2011 Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $244,990 $227,784 Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 12,451 29,673 96 12,340 11,570 Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7,120) (6,819) Change in plan provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 19 Projected benefit obligation at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $280,099 $244,990 The Company recognized an actuarial loss of $19.2 million in 2012 primarily due to a change in the discount rate from 5.18% in 2011 to 4.47% in 2012. The actuarial loss, net of tax, was recorded in other comprehensive loss. The Company recognized an actuarial loss of $21.4 million in 2011 primarily due to a change in the discount rate from 5.50% in 2010 to 5.18% in 2011 and lower than expected investment return on plan assets. The actuarial loss, net of tax, was also recorded in other comprehensive loss. The projected benefit obligations and accumulated benefit obligations for both of the Company’s pension plans were in excess of plan assets at December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012. The accumulated benefit obligation was $280.1 million and $245.0 million at December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. Change in Plan Assets In Thousands 2012 2011 Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $168,502 $166,130 Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employer contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,156 25,017 (262) 9,453 Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7,120) (6,819) Fair value of plan assets at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $206,555 $168,502 85 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Funded Status In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Projected benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(280,099) $(244,990) Plan assets at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206,555 168,502 Net funded status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (73,544) $ (76,488) Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0 Noncurrent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (73,544) (76,488) Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(73,544) $(76,488) Net Periodic Pension Cost In Thousands Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 105 $ 96 $ 79 Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,451 12,340 11,441 Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (12,462) (11,684) (11,525) Amortization of prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 18 14 Recognized net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,822 2,130 5,723 Net periodic pension cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,933 $ 2,900 $ 5,732 Significant Assumptions Used 2012 2011 2010 Projected benefit obligation at the measurement date: Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.47% 5.18% 5.50% Weighted average rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A N/A N/A Net periodic pension cost for the fiscal year: Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.18% 5.50% 6.00% Weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . 7.00% 7.00% 8.00% Weighted average rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N/A N/A N/A Cash Flows In Thousands Anticipated future pension benefit payments for the fiscal years: 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 – 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,972 8,400 8,887 9,371 9,989 61,009 86 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Anticipated contributions for the two Company-sponsored pension plans will be in the range of $1 million to $5 million in 2013. Plan Assets The Company’s pension plans target asset allocation for 2013, actual asset allocation at December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012 and the expected weighted average long-term rate of return by asset category were as follows: Percentage of Plan Assets at Fiscal Year- End 2012 2011 Weighted Average Expected Long-Term Rate of Return - 2012 Target Allocation 2013 U.S. large capitalization equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U.S. small/mid-capitalization equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43% 5% 17% 35% 42% 41% 4% 4% 11% 11% 43% 44% Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100% 100% 100% 3.6% 0.4% 1.5% 1.5% 7.0% All of the assets in the Company’s pension plans include investments in institutional investment funds managed by professional investment advisors which hold U.S. equities, international equities and debt securities. The objective of the Company’s investment philosophy is to earn the plans’ targeted rate of return over longer periods without assuming excess investment risk. The general guidelines for plan investments include 30% — 50% in large capitalization equity securities, 0% — 20% in U.S. small and mid-capitalization equity securities, 0% — 20% in international equity securities and 10% — 50% in debt securities. The Company currently has 57% of its plan investments in equity securities and 43% in debt securities. U.S. large capitalization equity securities include domestic based companies that are generally included in common market indices such as the S&P 500™ and the Russell 1000™. U.S. small and mid-capitalization equity securities include small domestic equities as represented by the Russell 2000™ index. International equity securities include companies from developed markets outside of the United States. Debt securities at December 30, 2012 are comprised of investments in two institutional bond funds with a weighted average duration of approximately three years. The weighted average expected long-term rate of return of plan assets of 7% was used in determining net periodic pension cost in both 2012 and 2011. This rate reflects an estimate of long-term future returns for the pension plan assets. This estimate is primarily a function of the asset classes (equities versus fixed income) in which the pension plan assets are invested and the analysis of past performance of these asset classes over a long period of time. This analysis includes expected long-term inflation and the risk premiums associated with equity investments and fixed income investments. 87 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following table summarizes the Company’s pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) at December 30, 2012: In Thousands Cash equivalents(1) Quoted Prices in Active Market for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Input (Level 2) Total Common/collective trust funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 461 $ 461 Equity securities(2) U.S. large capitalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U.S. mid-capitalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common/collective trust funds(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income Common/collective trust funds(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,414 1,789 1,548 0 606 0 0 0 0 99,399 0 13,414 1,789 1,548 99,399 606 89,338 89,338 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $17,357 $189,198 $206,555 (1) Cash equivalents are valued at their net asset value which approximates fair value. (2) Equity securities other than common/collective trust funds consist primarily of common stock. Investments in common stocks are valued using quoted market prices multiplied by the number of shares owned. (3) The underlying investments held in common/collective trust funds are actively managed equity securities and fixed income investment vehicles that are valued at the net asset value per share multiplied by the number of shares held as of the measurement date. The following table summarizes the Company’s pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) at January 1, 2012: In Thousands Cash equivalents(1) Quoted Prices in Active Market for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Input (Level 2) Total Common/collective trust funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 453 $ 453 Equity securities(2) U.S. large capitalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U.S. mid-capitalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common/collective trust funds(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income Common/collective trust funds(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,620 2,007 1,181 0 584 0 0 0 0 79,041 0 10,620 2,007 1,181 79,041 584 74,616 74,616 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,392 $154,110 $168,502 88 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (1) Cash equivalents are valued at their net asset value which approximates fair value. (2) Equity securities other than common/collective trust funds consist primarily of common stock. Investments in common stocks are valued using quoted market prices multiplied by the number of shares owned. (3) The underlying investments held in common/collective trust funds are actively managed equity securities and fixed income investment vehicles that are valued at the net asset value per share multiplied by the number of shares held as of the measurement date. The Company does not have any unobservable inputs (Level 3) pension plan assets. 401(k) Savings Plan The Company provides a 401(k) Savings Plan for substantially all of its employees who are not part of collective bargaining agreements. The Company matched the first 5% of participants’ contributions for 2011 and 2010. During the first quarter of 2012, the Company changed the Company’s matching from fixed to discretionary maintaining the option to make matching contributions for eligible participants of up to 5% based on the Company’s financial results for 2012 and future years. The 5% matching contributions were accrued during 2012. Based on the Company’s financial results, the Company decided to make matching contributions of 5% of participants’ contributions for the entire year of 2012. The Company made this contribution payment for 2012 in the first quarter of 2013. The total expense for this benefit was $8.2 million, $8.5 million and $8.7 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Postretirement Benefits The Company provides postretirement benefits for a portion of its current employees. The Company recognizes the cost of postretirement benefits, which consist principally of medical benefits, during employees’ periods of active service. The Company does not pre-fund these benefits and has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefits in the future. 89 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following tables set forth a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the benefit obligation, a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value of plan assets and funded status of the Company’s postretirement benefit plan: In Thousands Fiscal Year 2012 2011 Benefit obligation at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 64,696 $ 55,311 Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plan participants’ contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,256 2,981 584 4,287 961 2,926 568 7,901 Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4,030) (3,095) Medicare Part D subsidy reimbursement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 124 Benefit obligation at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 69,828 $ 64,696 Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0 Employer contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plan participants’ contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,392 584 2,403 568 Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4,030) (3,095) Medicare Part D subsidy reimbursement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Fair value of plan assets at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 124 0 In Thousands Dec. 30, 2012 Jan. 1, 2012 Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (2,653) $ (3,028) Noncurrent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (67,175) (61,668) Accrued liability at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(69,828) $(64,696) The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost were as follows: In Thousands Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,256 $ 961 $ 752 Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,981 2,926 2,521 Amortization of unrecognized transitional assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 (18) (25) Recognized net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,339 2,345 1,502 Amortization of prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,513) (1,717) (1,784) Net periodic postretirement benefit cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,063 $ 4,497 $ 2,966 90 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Significant Assumptions Used 2012 2011 2010 Benefit obligation at the measurement date: Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.11% 4.94% 5.25% Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the fiscal year: Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.94% 5.25% 5.75% The weighted average health care cost trend used in measuring the postretirement benefit expense in 2012 was 8.5% graded down to an ultimate rate of 5% by 2019. The weighted average health care cost trend used in measuring the postretirement benefit expense in 2011 was 10% graded down to an ultimate rate of 5% by 2016. The weighted average health care cost trend used in measuring the postretirement benefit expense in 2010 was 9% graded down to an ultimate rate of 5% by 2014. A 1% increase or decrease in this annual health care cost trend would have impacted the postretirement benefit obligation and service cost and interest cost of the Company’s postretirement benefit plan as follows: In Thousands Increase (decrease) in: 1% Increase 1% Decrease Postretirement benefit obligation at December 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $8,615 $(7,777) Service cost and interest cost in 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 542 (490) Cash Flows In Thousands Anticipated future postretirement benefit payments reflecting expected future service for the fiscal years: 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,653 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,901 3,145 3,444 3,765 2018 — 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,419 Anticipated future postretirement benefit payments are shown net of Medicare Part D subsidy reimbursements, which are not material. 91 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost at January 1, 2012, the activity during 2012, and the balances at December 30, 2012 are as follows: In Thousands Pension Plans: Jan. 1, 2012 Actuarial Gain (Loss) Reclassification Adjustments Dec. 30, 2012 Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(107,008) $(21,979) $ 2,822 $(126,165) Prior service cost (credit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (73) 0 17 (56) Postretirement Medical: Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (35,823) (4,287) Prior service cost (credit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,700 0 2,339 (1,513) (37,771) 7,187 $(134,204) $(26,266) $ 3,665 $(156,805) The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic cost during 2013 are as follows: In Thousands Pension Plans Postretirement Medical Total Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,349 $ 2,710 $ 6,059 Prior service cost (credit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 (1,513) (1,496) $3,366 $ 1,197 $ 4,563 Multi-Employer Benefits The Company currently participates in one multi-employer defined benefit pension plan covering certain employees whose employment is covered under collective bargaining agreements. The risks of participating in this multi-employer plan are different from single-employer plans in that assets contributed are pooled and may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers. If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers. If the Company chooses to stop participating in the multi-employer plan, the Company could be required to pay the plan a withdrawal liability based on the underfunded status of the plan. The Company stopped participation in one multi-employer defined pension plan in 2008. See below for additional information. The Company’s participation in the plan is outlined in the table below. The most recent Pension Protection Act (“PPA”) zone status available in 2012 and 2011 is for the plan’s years ending at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The plan is in the green zone which represents at least 80% funded and does not require a financial improvement plan (“FIP”) or a rehabilitation plan (“RP”). Pension Fund Pension Protection Act Zone Status 2012 2011 FIP/RP Status Pending/ Implemented Contribution (In thousands) 2012 2011 2010 Surcharge Imposed Employer-Teamsters Local Nos. 175 & 505 Pension Trust Fund (EIN/Pension Plan No. 55-6021850) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Green Green Other multi-employer plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No $652 317 $555 264 $481 247 $969 $819 $728 No 92 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the plan year ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, the Company was not listed in Employer-Teamsters Local Nos. 175 & 505 Pension Trust Fund Forms 5500 as providing more than 5% of the total contributions for the plan. At the date these financial statements were issued, Forms 5500 were not available for the plan year ending December 31, 2012. The collective bargaining agreements covering the Employer-Teamsters Local Nos. 175 & 505 Pension Trust Fund will expire on April 27, 2014 and July 26, 2015. During 2008, the Company entered into a new agreement allowing the Company to freeze its liability to Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Plan (“Central States”), a multi-employer defined benefit pension fund, while preserving the pension benefits previously earned by the employees. As of December 30, 2012, the Company has a liability of $9.6 million recorded related to the Company’s exit from the Central States multi- employer pension plan. The Company is required to make payments of approximately $1 million each year through 2028 to the Central States multi-employer pension plan. 18. Related Party Transactions The Company’s business consists primarily of the production, marketing and distribution of nonalcoholic beverages of The Coca-Cola Company, which is the sole owner of the secret formulas under which the primary components (either concentrate or syrup) of its soft drink products are manufactured. As of December 30, 2012, The Coca-Cola Company had a 34.8% interest in the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, representing 5.1% of the total voting power of the Company’s Common Stock and Class B Common Stock voting together as a single class. The Coca-Cola Company does not own any shares of Class B Common Stock of the Company. In August 2007, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Energy Brands Inc. (“Energy Brands”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company. Energy Brands, also known as glacéau, is a producer and distributor of branded enhanced beverages including vitaminwater and smartwater. The distribution agreement is effective November 1, 2007 for a period of ten years and, unless earlier terminated, will be automatically renewed for succeeding ten-year terms, subject to a one year non-renewal notification by the Company. In conjunction with the execution of the distribution agreement, the Company entered into an agreement with The Coca-Cola Company whereby the Company agreed not to introduce new third party brands or certain third party brand extensions in the United States through August 31, 2010 unless mutually agreed to by the Company and The Coca-Cola Company. The following table summarizes the significant transactions between the Company and The Coca-Cola Company: In Millions Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Payments by the Company for concentrate, syrup, sweetener and other purchases . . . . $406.2 $399.1 $393.5 Marketing funding support payments to the Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (43.2) (47.3) (45.1) Payments by the Company net of marketing funding support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $363.0 $351.8 $348.4 Payments by the Company for customer marketing programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 56.8 $ 51.4 $ 50.7 Payments by the Company for cold drink equipment parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fountain delivery and equipment repair fees paid to the Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Presence marketing support provided by The Coca-Cola Company on the Company’s behalf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payments to the Company to facilitate the distribution of certain brands and packages to other Coca-Cola bottlers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sales of finished products to The Coca-Cola Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.2 11.9 9.3 11.4 8.6 10.4 3.5 2.6 0.0 4.1 2.0 0.0 4.4 2.8 0.1 93 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Company has a production arrangement with Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. (“CCR”) to buy and sell finished products at cost. The Coca-Cola Company acquired Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. (“CCE”) on October 2, 2010. In connection with the transaction, CCE changed its name to CCR and transferred its beverage operations outside of North America to an independent third party. As a result of the transaction, the North American operations of CCE are now included in CCR. References to “CCR” refer to CCR and CCE as it existed prior to the acquisition by The Coca-Cola Company. Sales to CCR under this arrangement were $64.6 million, $55.0 million and $48.5 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Purchases from CCR under this arrangement were $31.3 million, $23.4 million and $24.8 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In addition, CCR began distributing one of the Company’s own brands (Tum-E Yummies) in the first quarter of 2010. Total sales to CCR for this brand were $22.8 million, $16.8 million and $12.9 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Along with all the other Coca-Cola bottlers in the United States, the Company is a member in Coca-Cola Bottlers’ Sales and Services Company, LLC (“CCBSS”), which was formed in 2003 for the purposes of facilitating various procurement functions and distributing certain specified beverage products of The Coca-Cola Company with the intention of enhancing the efficiency and competitiveness of the Coca-Cola bottling system in the United States. CCBSS negotiates the procurement for the majority of the Company’s raw materials (excluding concentrate). The Company pays an administrative fee to CCBSS for its services. Administrative fees to CCBSS for its services were $.5 million, $.4 million and $.5 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amounts due from CCBSS for rebates on raw material purchases were $3.8 million and $5.2 million as of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. CCR is also a member of CCBSS. The Company leases from Harrison Limited Partnership One (“HLP”) the Snyder Production Center (“SPC”) and an adjacent sales facility, which are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. HLP is directly and indirectly owned by trusts of which J. Frank Harrison, III, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Deborah H. Everhart, a director of the Company, are trustees and beneficiaries. Morgan H. Everett, a director of the Company, is a permissible, discretionary beneficiary of the trusts that directly or indirectly own HLP. The original lease expired on December 31, 2010. On March 23, 2009, the Company modified the lease agreement (new terms began January 1, 2011) with HLP related to the SPC lease. The modified lease would not have changed the classification of the existing lease had it been in effect in the first quarter of 2002, when the capital lease was recorded, as the Company received a renewal option to extend the term of the lease, which it expected to exercise. The modified lease did not extend the term of the existing lease (remaining lease term was reduced from approximately 22 years (including renewal options) to approximately 12 years). Accordingly, the present value of the leased property under capital leases and capital lease obligations was adjusted by an amount equal to the difference between the future minimum lease payments under the modified lease agreement and the present value of the existing obligation on the modification date. The capital lease obligations and leased property under capital leases were both decreased by $7.5 million in March 2009. The annual base rent the Company is obligated to pay under the modified lease is subject to an adjustment for an inflation factor. The prior lease annual base rent was subject to adjustment for an inflation factor and for increases or decreases in interest rates, using LIBOR as the measurement device. The principal balance outstanding under this capital lease as of December 30, 2012 was $24.1 million. The minimum rentals and contingent rental payments that relate to this lease were as follows: In Millions Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Minimum rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3.5 $3.4 $ 4.9 Contingent rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 (1.7) Total rental payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3.5 $3.4 $ 3.2 94 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The contingent rentals in 2010 reduce the minimum rentals as a result of changes in interest rates, using LIBOR as the measurement device. Increases or decreases in lease payments that result from changes in the interest rate factor were recorded as adjustments to interest expense. The Company leases from Beacon Investment Corporation (“Beacon”) the Company’s headquarters office facility and an adjacent office facility. The lease expires on December 31, 2021. Beacon’s sole shareholder is J. Frank Harrison, III. The principal balance outstanding under this capital lease as of December 30, 2012 was $25.1 million. The annual base rent the Company is obligated to pay under the lease is subject to adjustment for increases in the Consumer Price Index. The minimum rentals and contingent rental payments that relate to this lease were as follows: In Millions Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Minimum rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contingent rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3.5 0.5 $3.5 0.4 $3.6 0.2 Total rental payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4.0 $3.9 $3.8 The contingent rentals in 2012, 2011 and 2010 are a result of changes in the Consumer Price Index. Increases or decreases in lease payments that result from changes in the Consumer Price Index were recorded as adjustments to interest expense. The Company is a shareholder in two entities from which it purchases substantially all of its requirements for plastic bottles. Net purchases from these entities were $82.3 million, $83.9 million and $74.0 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In conjunction with the Company’s participation in one of these entities, Southeastern, the Company has guaranteed a portion of the entity’s debt. Such guarantee amounted to $13.5 million as of December 30, 2012. The Company’s equity investment in Southeastern was $19.5 million and $17.9 million as of December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively, and was recorded in other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company is a member of SAC, a manufacturing cooperative. SAC sells finished products to the Company and Piedmont at cost. Purchases from SAC by the Company and Piedmont for finished products were $141 million, $134 million and $131 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company also manages the operations of SAC pursuant to a management agreement. Management fees earned from SAC were $1.5 million, $1.6 million and $1.5 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company has also guaranteed a portion of debt for SAC. Such guarantee amounted to $22.4 million as of December 30, 2012. The Company’s equity investment in SAC was $4.1 million as of both December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012. The Company holds no assets as collateral against the Southeastern or SAC guarantees, the fair value of which is immaterial. The Company monitors its investments in cooperatives and would be required to write down its investment if an impairment is identified and the Company determined it to be other than temporary. No impairment of the Company’s investments in cooperatives has been identified as of December 30, 2012 nor was there any impairment in 2012, 2011 and 2010. 95 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 19. Net Sales by Product Category Net sales in the last three fiscal years by product category were as follows: In Thousands Bottle/can sales: Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Sparkling beverages (including energy products) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,073,071 $1,052,164 $1,031,423 Still beverages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233,895 219,628 213,570 Total bottle/can sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,306,966 1,271,792 1,244,993 Other sales: Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Post-mix and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152,401 155,066 150,274 139,173 140,807 128,799 Total other sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307,467 289,447 269,606 Total net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,614,433 $1,561,239 $1,514,599 Sparkling beverages are carbonated beverages and energy products while still beverages are noncarbonated beverages. 20. Net Income Per Share The following table sets forth the computation of basic net income per share and diluted net income per share under the two-class method. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to net income per share. In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) Numerator for basic and diluted net income per Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share: Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated . . . . . . . . . . . . . $27,217 $28,608 $36,057 Less dividends: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,141 2,083 7,141 2,062 7,141 2,039 Total undistributed earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $17,993 $19,405 $26,877 Common Stock undistributed earnings — basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,927 $15,056 $20,905 Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings — basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,066 4,349 5,972 Total undistributed earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $17,993 $19,405 $26,877 Common Stock undistributed earnings — diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,867 $14,990 $20,814 Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings — diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,126 4,415 6,063 Total undistributed earnings — diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $17,993 $19,405 $26,877 96 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) Numerator for basic net income per Common Stock share: Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Dividends on Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,141 $ 7,141 $ 7,141 Common Stock undistributed earnings — basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,927 15,056 20,905 Numerator for basic net income per Common Stock share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $21,068 $22,197 $28,046 Numerator for basic net income per Class B Common Stock share: Dividends on Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,083 $ 2,062 $ 2,039 Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings — basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,066 4,349 5,972 Numerator for basic net income per Class B Common Stock share . . . . . . . $ 6,149 $ 6,411 $ 8,011 Numerator for diluted net income per Common Stock share: Dividends on Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,141 $ 7,141 $ 7,141 Dividends on Class B Common Stock assumed converted to Common Stock . . . 2,083 2,062 2,039 Common Stock undistributed earnings — diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,993 19,405 26,877 Numerator for diluted net income per Common Stock share . . . . . . . . . . . . . $27,217 $28,608 $36,057 Numerator for diluted net income per Class B Common Stock share: Dividends on Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,083 $ 2,062 $ 2,039 Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings — diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,126 4,415 6,063 Numerator for diluted net income per Class B Common Stock share . . . . . . . . $ 6,209 $ 6,477 $ 8,102 Denominator for basic net income per Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share: Common Stock weighted average shares outstanding — basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock weighted average shares outstanding — basic . . . . . . . . 7,141 2,085 7,141 2,063 7,141 2,040 Denominator for diluted net income per Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share: Common Stock weighted average shares outstanding — diluted (assumes conversion of Class B Common Stock to Common Stock) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock weighted average shares outstanding — diluted . . . . . . . 9,266 2,125 9,244 2,103 9,221 2,080 Basic net income per share: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted net income per share: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ 2.95 2.95 2.94 2.92 $ $ $ $ 3.11 3.11 3.09 3.08 $ $ $ $ 3.93 3.93 3.91 3.90 97 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO TABLE (1) For purposes of the diluted net income per share computation for Common Stock, shares of Class B Common Stock are assumed to be converted; therefore, 100% of undistributed earnings is allocated to Common Stock. (2) For purposes of the diluted net income per share computation for Class B Common Stock, weighted average shares of Class B Common Stock are assumed to be outstanding for the entire period and not converted. (3) Denominator for diluted net income per share for Common Stock and Class B Common Stock includes the diluted effect of shares relative to the Performance Unit Award. 21. Risks and Uncertainties Approximately 88% of the Company’s 2012 bottle/can volume to retail customers are products of The Coca- Cola Company, which is the sole supplier of these products or of the concentrates or syrups required to manufacture these products. The remaining 12% of the Company’s 2012 bottle/can volume to retail customers are products of other beverage companies or those owned by the Company. The Company has beverage agreements under which it has various requirements to meet. Failure to meet the requirements of these beverage agreements could result in the loss of distribution rights for the respective product. The Company’s products are sold and distributed directly by its employees to retail stores and other outlets. During 2012, approximately 68% of the Company’s bottle/can volume to retail customers was sold for future consumption, while the remaining bottle/can volume to retail customers of approximately 32% was sold for immediate consumption. The Company’s largest customers, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Food Lion, LLC, accounted for accounted approximately 22% and 8%, respectively, of the Company’s total bottle/can volume during 2012; approximately 21% and 9%, respectively, of the Company’s total bottle/can volume to retail customers during 2011; and approximately 24% and 10%, respectively, of the Company’s total bottle/can volume to retail customers during 2010. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. accounted for approximately 15%, 15% and 17% of the Company’s total net sales during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No other customer represented greater than 10% of the Company’s total net sales for any years presented. The Company obtains all of its aluminum cans from two domestic suppliers. The Company currently obtains all of its plastic bottles from two domestic entities. See Note 13 and Note 18 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information. The Company is exposed to price risk on such commodities as aluminum, corn and resin which affects the cost of raw materials used in the production of finished products. The Company both produces and procures these finished products. Examples of the raw materials affected are aluminum cans and plastic bottles used for packaging and high fructose corn syrup used as a product ingredient. Further, the Company is exposed to commodity price risk on crude oil which impacts the Company’s cost of fuel used in the movement and delivery of the Company’s products. The Company participates in commodity hedging and risk mitigation programs administered both by CCBSS and by the Company. In addition, there is no limit on the price The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies can charge for concentrate. Certain liabilities of the Company are subject to risk of changes in both long-term and short-term interest rates. These liabilities include floating rate debt, retirement benefit obligations and the Company’s pension liability. Approximately 7% of the Company’s labor force is covered by collective bargaining agreements. One collective bargaining agreement covering approximately .4% of the Company’s employees expired during 2012 and the Company entered into a new agreement in 2012. Two collective bargaining agreements covering approximately .7% of the Company’s employees will expire during 2013. 98 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 22. Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information Changes in current assets and current liabilities affecting cash were as follows: In Thousands Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Accounts receivable, trade, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,991 $(8,728) $(4,015) Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6,221) 3,642 (7,972) Accounts receivable, other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,998 (45) (1,875) Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 (1,288) (7,887) Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,785) Accounts payable, trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,259 Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6,320) 6,936 Accrued compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,008 3,707 4,514 9,092 (2,549) (2,741) 9,142 6,252 (2,822) 7,487 3,608 Accrued interest payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,388) (75) 2 (Increase) decrease in current assets less current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (288) $ 5,529 $ 1,920 Non-cash activity Additions to property, plant and equipment of $14.4 million, $6.2 million and $10.4 million have been accrued but not paid and are recorded in accounts payable, trade as of December 30, 2012, January 1, 2012 and January 2, 2011, respectively. Additions to property, plant and equipment included $1.5 million for a trade-in allowance on manufacturing equipment in 2010. Cash payments for interest and income taxes were as follows: In Thousands Fiscal Year 2012 2011 2010 Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $35,149 $34,989 $34,117 Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,119 20,414 14,117 99 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 23. New Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted Pronouncements In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended its guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income in financial statements to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items that are recorded in other comprehensive income. The new guidance requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. The Company elected to report components of comprehensive income in two separate but consecutive statements. The new guidance was effective for the quarter ended April 1, 2012 and was applied retrospectively. The Company’s adoption of the new guidance resulted in a change in the presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements but did not have any impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity. In September 2011, the FASB issued new guidance relative to the test for goodwill impairment. The new guidance permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In July 2012, the FASB issued new guidance relative to the test for indefinite-lived intangibles impairment. The new guidance permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim indefinite-lived intangibles impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Recently Issued Pronouncements In December 2011, the FASB issued new guidance that is intended to enhance current disclosures on offsetting financial assets and liabilities. The new guidance requires an entity to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments eligible for offset on the balance sheet and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The provisions of the new guidance are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company does not expect the requirements of this new guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued new guidance which establishes new requirements for disclosing reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The new guidance requires a company to report the effect of significant reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to the respective line items in net income or cross-reference to other disclosures for items not reclassified entirely to net income. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The new guidance expands disclosure of other comprehensive income but does not change the manner in which items of other comprehensive income are accounted for or the way in which net income or other comprehensive income is reported in the financial statements. 100 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 24. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) Set forth below are unaudited quarterly financial data for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012. Year Ended December 30, 2012 In thousands (except per share data) Quarter 1(1) 2 3(2) 4(3)(4) Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $377,185 $430,693 $419,855 $386,700 Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155,594 173,413 170,928 154,374 Net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated . . 4,565 10,747 10,079 1,826 Basic net income per share based on net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted net income per share based on net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ .50 .50 .49 .49 $ $ $ $ 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.08 $ $ $ $ .20 .20 .20 .19 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 $ $ $ $ Quarter Year Ended January 1, 2012 In thousands (except per share data) 1(5) 2(6) 3(7)(8) 4(9) Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $359,629 $422,893 $405,858 $372,859 Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149,161 165,573 162,716 151,793 Net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated . . 5,913 11,101 9,768 1,826 Basic net income per share based on net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted net income per share based on net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated: Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class B Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ .64 .64 .64 .64 $ $ $ $ 1.21 1.21 1.20 1.20 $ $ $ $ 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.05 $ $ $ $ .20 .20 .20 .19 Sales are seasonal with the highest sales volume occurring in May, June, July and August. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for information concerning the revision of prior period financial statements. (1) Net income in the first quarter of 2012 included a $0.7 million debit to income tax expense ($0.08 per basic common share) to increase the valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets of the Company. (2) Net income in the third quarter of 2012 included a $1.0 million ($0.6 million, net of tax, or $0.07 per basic common share) credit for a mark-to-market adjustment related to the Company’s commodity hedging program. (3) Net income in the fourth quarter of 2012 included a $0.5 million ($0.3 million, net of tax, or $0.03 per basic common share) debit for a mark-to-market adjustment related to the Company’s commodity hedging program. 101 COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (4) Net income in the fourth quarter of 2012 included a $0.6 million debit to income tax expense ($0.07 per basic common share) to increase the valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets of the Company. (5) Net income in the first quarter of 2011 included a $0.5 million ($0.3 million, net of tax, or $0.03 per basic common share) debit for a mark-to-market adjustment related to the Company’s commodity hedging program. (6) Net income in the second quarter of 2011 included a $1.7 million ($1.0 million, net of tax, or $0.11 per basic common share) debit for a mark-to-market adjustment related to the Company’s commodity hedging program. (7) Net income for the third quarter of 2011 included a $1.8 million ($1.2 million, net of tax, or $0.12 per basic common share) debit for a mark-to-market adjustment related to the Company’s commodity hedging program. (8) Net income in the third quarter of 2011 included a $0.9 million credit to income tax expense ($0.10 per basic common share) related to the reduction of the liability for uncertain tax positions due mainly to the expiration of applicable statute of limitations. (9) Net income in the fourth quarter of 2011 included a $2.6 million ($1.6 million, net of tax, or $0.17 per basic common share) debit for a mark-to-market adjustment related to the Company’s commodity hedging program. 102 Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Management of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s chief executive and chief financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company; in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. As of December 30, 2012, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2012 was effective. The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2012, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing on page 104. March 14, 2013 103 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated: In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated and its subsidiaries at December 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 30, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements and the financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Charlotte, North Carolina March 14, 2013 104 The financial statement schedule required by Regulation S-X is set forth in response to Item 15 below. The supplementary data required by Item 302 of Regulation S-K is set forth in Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Not applicable. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 30, 2012. See page 103 for “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” See page 104 for the “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.” There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 30, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Item 9B. Other Information Not applicable. 105 PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance For information with respect to the executive officers of the Company, see “Executive Officers of the Company” included as a separate item at the end of Part I of this Report. For information with respect to the Directors of the Company, see the “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” section of the Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference. For information with respect to Section 16 reports, see the “Additional Information About Directors and Executive Officers — Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” section of the Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference. For information with respect to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, see the “Corporate Governance — Board Committees” section of the Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference. The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which is intended to qualify as a “code of ethics” within the meaning of Item 406 of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act (the “Code of Ethics”). The Code of Ethics applies to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer; Chief Operating Officer; Chief Financial Officer; Chief Accounting Officer; Vice President and Treasurer and any other person performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics is available on the Company’s website at www.cokeconsolidated.com. The Company intends to disclose any substantive amendments to, or waivers from, its Code of Ethics on its website or in a report on Form 8-K. Item 11. Executive Compensation For information with respect to executive and director compensation, see the “Executive Compensation Tables,” “Additional Information About Directors and Executive Officers — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Compensation Committee Report,” “Director Compensation” and “Corporate Governance — The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight” sections of the Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which are incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters For information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management, see the “Principal Stockholders” and “Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” sections of the Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which are incorporated herein by reference. For information with respect to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, see the “Equity Compensation Plan Information” section of the Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence For information with respect to certain relationships and related transactions, see the “Related Person Transactions” section of the Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference. For certain information with respect to director independence, see the disclosures in the “Corporate Governance” section of the Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders regarding director independence, which are incorporated herein by reference. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services For information with respect to principal accountant fees and services, see “Proposal 2: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” of the Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference. 106 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules (a) List of documents filed as part of this report. 1. Financial Statements Consolidated Statements of Operations Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Consolidated Balance Sheets Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 2. Financial Statement Schedule Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves All other financial statements and schedules not listed have been omitted because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto, or is not applicable or required. 3. Listing of Exhibits The agreements included in the following exhibits to this report are included to provide information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. Some of the agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreements. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreements and: • should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate; • may have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement; • may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and • were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments. Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. 107 Number Description (3.1) Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. Exhibit Index (3.2) Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company. (4.1) Specimen of Common Stock Certificate. (4.2) Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 3, 1995, between the Company and Citibank, N.A. (as successor to NationsBank of Georgia, National Association, the initial trustee). (4.3) (4.4) (4.5) Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Sections 102 and 301 of the Indenture, dated as of July 20, 1994, as supplemented and restated by the Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 3, 1995, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee, relating to the establishment of the Company’s $110,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.00% Senior Notes due 2019. Resolutions adopted by Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company related to the establishment of the Company’s $110,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.00% Senior Notes due 2019. Form of the Company’s 5.30% Senior Notes due 2015. (4.6) Form of the Company’s 5.00% Senior Notes due 2016. (4.7) Form of the Company’s 7.00% Senior Notes due 2019. (4.8) (4.9) Third Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated as of June 16, 2010, by and between the Company and Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership. The registrant, by signing this report, agrees to furnish the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon its request, a copy of any instrument which defines the rights of holders of long-term debt of 108 Incorporated by Reference or Filed Herewith Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2003 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 10, 2007 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 as filed on May 31, 1985 (File No. 2-97822). Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2010 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2010 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2003 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2005 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2009 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2010 (File No. 0-9286). Number Description Incorporated by Reference or Filed Herewith (10.1) (10.2) the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries which authorizes a total amount of securities not in excess of 10 percent of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. U.S. $200,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated as of September 21, 2011, by and among the Company, the banks named therein and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement, effective as of July 15, 1993, made by the Company and each of the other guarantor parties thereto in favor of Trust Company Bank and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America. (10.3) Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2000, made by the Company in favor of Wachovia Bank, N.A. (10.4) Guaranty Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2001, made by the Company in favor of Wachovia, Bank, N.A. (10.5) (10.6) (10.7) (10.8) (10.9) Amended and Restated Stock Rights and Restrictions Agreement, dated February 19, 2009, by and among the Company, The Coca-Cola Company, Carolina Coca-Cola Bottling Investments, Inc. and J. Frank Harrison, III. Termination of Irrevocable Proxy and Voting Agreement, dated February 19, 2009, by and between The Coca-Cola Company and J. Frank Harrison, III. Form of Master Bottle Contract (“Cola Beverage Agreement”), made and entered into, effective January 27, 1989, between The Coca-Cola Company and the Company, together with Form of Home Market Amendment to Master Bottle Contract, effective as of October 29, 1999. Form of Allied Bottle Contract (“Allied Beverage Agreement”), made and entered into, effective January 11, 1990, between The Coca-Cola Company and the Company (as successor to Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Anderson, S.C.). Letter Agreement, dated January 27, 1989, between The Coca-Cola Company and the Company, modifying the Cola Beverage Agreements and Allied Beverage Agreements. (10.10) Form of Marketing and Distribution Agreement (“Still Beverage Agreement”), made and entered into effective October 1, 2000, between The Coca-Cola Company and the Company (as successor to Metrolina Bottling Company), with respect to Dasani. Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2011 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2001 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2001 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 19, 2009 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 19, 2009 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2010 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2010 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2010 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2010 (File No. 0-9286). 109 Number Description (10.11) Form of Letter Agreement, dated December 10, 2001, between The Coca-Cola Company and the Company, together with Letter Agreement, dated December 14, 1994, modifying the Still Beverage Agreements. Incidence Pricing Letter Agreement (“Pricing Agreement”), dated March 16, 2009, between The Coca-Cola Company, by and through its Coca-Cola North America division, and the Company. ** (10.12) (10.13) Amendment No. 2 to Pricing Agreement, dated December 15, 2011, between the Company and The Coca-Cola Company, by and through its Coca-Cola North America division. (10.14) Letter Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2008, by and between the Company and The Coca-Cola Company.** (10.15) Lease, dated as of January 1, 1999, by and between the Company and Ragland Corporation. (10.16) First Amendment to Lease and First Amendment to Memorandum of Lease, dated as of August 30, 2002, between the Company and Ragland Corporation. (10.17) Lease Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2009, between the Company and Harrison Limited Partnership One. (10.18) Lease Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2006, between CCBCC Operations, LLC and Beacon Investment Corporation. (10.19) Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of Coca-Cola Bottlers’ Sales & Services Company LLC, made as of January 1, 2003, by and between Coca-Cola Bottlers’ Sales & Services Company LLC and Consolidated Beverage Co., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. (10.20) Partnership Agreement of Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership (formerly known as Carolina Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership), dated as of July 2, 1993, by and among Carolina Coca-Cola Bottling Investments, Inc., Coca-Cola Ventures, Inc., Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Affiliated, Inc., Fayetteville Coca-Cola Bottling Company and Palmetto Bottling Company. Incorporated by Reference or Filed Herewith Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2010 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2010 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2011 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2008 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 26, 2009 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2006 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.35 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002 (File No. 0-9286). 110 Number Description (10.21) Master Amendment to Partnership Agreement, Management Agreement and Definition and Adjustment Agreement, dated as of January 2, 2002, by and among Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership, CCBC of Wilmington, Inc., The Coca-Cola Company, Piedmont Partnership Holding Company, Coca-Cola Ventures, Inc. and the Company. (10.22) Fourth Amendment to Partnership Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2003, by and among Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership, Piedmont Partnership Holding Company and Coca-Cola Ventures, Inc. (10.23) Management Agreement, dated as of July 2, 1993, by and among the Company, Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership (formerly known as Carolina Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership), CCBC of Wilmington, Inc., Carolina Coca-Cola Bottling Investments, Inc., Coca-Cola Ventures, Inc. and Palmetto Bottling Company. (10.24) First Amendment to Management Agreement (relating to the Management Agreement designated as Exhibit 10.23 of this Exhibit Index) effective as of January 1, 2001. (10.25) Management Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2004, by and among CCBCC Operations, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and South Atlantic Canners, Inc. (10.26) Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1994, between the Company and South Atlantic Canners, Inc. (10.27) Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated Amended and Restated Annual Bonus Plan, effective January 1, 2012.* (10.28) Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated Amended and Restated Long-Term Performance Plan, effective January 1, 2012.* (10.29) Form of Long-Term Performance Plan Bonus Award Agreement.* (10.30) Performance Unit Award Agreement, dated February 27, 2008.* Incorporated by Reference or Filed Herewith Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 14, 2002 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2003 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2004 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002 (File No. 0-9286). Appendix C to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (File No. 0-9286). Appendix D to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2010 (File No. 0-9286). Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (File No. 0-9286). 111 Incorporated by Reference or Filed Herewith Exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2012 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2007 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 (File No. 0-9286). Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2005 (File No. 0-9286). Filed herewith. Filed herewith. Filed herewith. Filed herewith. Filed herewith. Number Description (10.31) Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated Supplemental Savings Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective November 1, 2011.* (10.32) Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated Director Deferral Plan, effective January 1, 2005.* (10.33) Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated Officer Retention Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2007.* (10.34) Amendment No. 1 to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated Officer Retention Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009. * (10.35) Life Insurance Benefit Agreement, effective as of December 28, 2003, by and between the Company and Jan M. Harrison, Trustee under the J. Frank Harrison, III 2003 Irrevocable Trust, John R. Morgan, Trustee under the Harrison Family 2003 Irrevocable Trust, and J. Frank Harrison, III.* (10.36) Form of Amended and Restated Split-Dollar and Deferred Compensation Replacement Benefit Agreement, effective as of November 1, 2005, between the Company and eligible employees of the Company.* (31.2) (12) (21) (31.1) (10.37) Form of Split-Dollar and Deferred Compensation Replacement Benefit Agreement Election Form and Agreement Amendment, effective as of June 20, 2005, between the Company and certain executive officers of the Company.* Ratio of earnings to fixed charges. List of subsidiaries. Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Financial statement from the annual report on Form 10-K of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2012, filed on March 14, 2013, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (101) (32) 112 * Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as exhibits to this form pursuant to Item 15(c) of this report. ** Certain portions of the exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested for such portions of the exhibit. (b) Exhibits. See Item 15(a)3 (c) Financial Statement Schedules. See Item 15(a)2 113 Schedule II COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES (In thousands) Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Description Balance at Beginning of Year Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses Fiscal year ended December 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,521 Fiscal year ended January 1, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,300 $ 257 $ 518 Fiscal year ended January 2, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,187 $(445) Deductions $288 $297 $442 Balance at End of Year $1,490 $1,521 $1,300 Deferred Income Tax Valuation Allowance Description Balance at Beginning of Year Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses Additions Charged to Other Deductions Not Credited To Expense Fiscal year ended December 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,464 $1,513 Fiscal year ended January 1, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 499 $ 707 Fiscal year ended January 2, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 530 $ 25 $569 $286 $ 0 $315 $ 28 $ 56 Balance at End of Year $3,231 $1,464 $ 499 114 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES Date: March 14, 2013 By: COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED (REGISTRANT) /s/ J. Frank Harrison, III J. Frank Harrison, III Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title Date By: /s/ J. FRANK HARRISON, III J. Frank Harrison, III Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Director By: /s/ H. W. MCKAY BELK H. W. McKay Belk By: /s/ ALEXANDER B. CUMMINGS, JR. By: By: By: By: By: By: Alexander B. Cummings, Jr. /s/ SHARON A. DECKER Sharon A. Decker /s/ WILLIAM B. ELMORE William B. Elmore /s/ MORGAN H. EVERETT Morgan H. Everett /s/ DEBORAH H. EVERHART Deborah H. Everhart /s/ HENRY W. FLINT Henry W. Flint /s/ WILLIAM H. JONES William H. Jones By: /s/ JAMES H. MORGAN James H. Morgan By: /s/ JOHN W. MURREY, III John W. Murrey, III /s/ DENNIS A. WICKER Dennis A. Wicker /s/ JAMES E. HARRIS James E. Harris By: By: By: Director Director Director March 14, 2013 March 14, 2013 March 14, 2013 March 14, 2013 Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors March 14, 2013 and Director Director of Community Relations and Director March 14, 2013 Director March 14, 2013 President, Chief Operating Officer and Director Director Director Director Director March 14, 2013 March 14, 2013 March 14, 2013 March 14, 2013 March 14, 2013 Senior Vice President, Shared Services and Chief Financial Officer March 14, 2013 /s/ WILLIAM J. BILLIARD William J. Billiard Vice President, Operations Finance and Chief Accounting Officer March 14, 2013 115 CORPORATE INFORMATION Transfer Agent and Dividend Disbursing Agent The Company’s transfer agent is responsible for stockholder records, issuance of stock certificates and distribution of dividend payments and IRS Form 1099s. The transfer agent also administers plans for dividend reinvestment and direct deposit. Stockholder requests and inquiries concerning these matters are most efficiently answered by corresponding directly with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11219. Communication may also be made by telephone Toll-Free (866) 627-2648, via the Internet at www.amstock.com, or by email at info@amstock.com. Stock Listing The NASDAQ Global Select Market NASDAQ Symbol – COKE Company Website www.cokeconsolidated.com The Company makes available free of charge through its Internet website its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Corporate Office The corporate office is located at 4100 Coca-Cola Plaza, Charlotte, North Carolina 28211. The mailing address is Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, P. O. Box 31487, Charlotte, NC 28231. Annual Meeting The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated will be held at the Company’s Corporate Center, 4100 Coca-Cola Plaza, Charlotte, NC 28211 on Tuesday, May 14, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., local time. Form 10-K and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers A copy of the Company’s Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (Form 10-K) and its Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers is available to stockholders without charge upon written request to James E. Harris, Senior Vice President, Shared Services and Chief Financial Officer, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, P. O. Box 31487, Charlotte, North Carolina 28231. This information may also be obtained from the Company’s website listed above. Bo a rD oF D Ir eCt o rS J. Frank Harrison, III Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated H.W. McKay Belk Managing Director HWMB Advisors, LLC Alexander B. Cummings, Jr. Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer The Coca‑Cola Company Sharon A. Decker Secretary of Commerce State of North Carolina William B. Elmore Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors Dr. William H. Jones President Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated Columbia International University Morgan H. Everett Community Relations Director Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated James H. Morgan Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. Deborah H. Everhart Affiliate Broker Real Estate Brokers LLC Henry W. Flint President and Chief Operating Officer John W. Murrey, III Assistant Professor Appalachian School of Law Dennis A. Wicker Partner Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough LLP Former Lieutenant Governor State of North Carolina eXeCu tI Ve oF F I Ce rS J. Frank Harrison, III Chairman of the Board of Directors and Robert G. Chambless Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing Chief Executive Officer Henry W. Flint President and Chief Operating Officer William B. Elmore Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors William J. Billiard Vice President, Operations Finance and Chief Accounting Officer Clifford M. Deal, III Vice President and Treasurer Norman C. George President, BYB Brands, Inc. James E. Harris Senior Vice President, Shared Services and Chief Financial Officer David L. Hopkins Senior Vice President, Operations Umesh M. Kasbekar Senior Vice President, Planning and Administration David M. Katz Senior Vice President, Assistant to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Lauren C. Steele Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs Michael A. Strong Senior Vice President, Human Resources a n n u a l r e p o r t | 2 0 1 2 Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated 4100 Coca‑Cola Plaza | Charlotte, NC 28211 Mailing Address: Post Office Box 31487 | Charlotte, NC 28231 704.557.4400 www.CokeConsolidated.com facebook.com/CokeConsolidated twitter.com/CokeCCBCC 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above