2016 Annual Report
We pursue a higher standard
About Coeur
2 Coeur Mining | 2016 Annual Report
Coeur Mining is a well-diversified, growing precious metals producer with five
precious metals mines in the Americas employing over 2,000 people. Coeur
produces from its wholly-owned operations: the Palmarejo silver-gold complex in
Mexico, the Rochester silver-gold mine in Nevada, the Kensington gold mine in
Alaska, the Wharf gold mine in South Dakota, and the San Bartolomé silver mine
in Bolivia. The Company also has a non-operating interest in the Endeavor mine in
Australia. In addition, the Company owns the La Preciosa project in Mexico,
a silver-gold exploration stage project. Coeur conducts exploration activities
throughout North and South America.
Investment Highlights
Enhanced and repositioned portfolio
3 Balanced precious metals asset base
3 Strong operational execution
3 Complementary, well-timed strategic acquisitions
Returns-driven growth strategy now resulting in strong cash flow
3 Well-advanced, high-quality expansions
3 Industry-leading cost reductions
3 Near-mine exploration focus on extending and enhancing reserves
Recently revamped balance sheet
3 Conservative and flexible
3 Capable of supporting future growth
3 Strong liquidity
Highlights
Historical Silver Equivalent Ounce
(“AgEqOz”) 1 Production
Companywide
All-in Sustaining Costs 1
32.2
35.6
36.3
39.7
$19.72
$18.81
Average Spot AgEqOz1
60:1 AgEqOz1
$16.08
$16.00
$14.27
$14.50
$16.50
$14.62
2014
2015
2016
2017E1
2014
2015
2016
2017E1
Financials
($ million, except per share figures)
Revenue
Costs applicable to sales
Net income (loss)
Diluted net Income (loss) per share
Cash flow from operating activities
Adjusted EBITDA1
Adjusted EBITDA Margin1
Capital expenditures
($ million)
Cash and cash equivalents
Total assets
Total debt2, including current portion
Total stockholders’ equity
Year ended December 31,
2016
$665.8
409.5
55.4
$0.34
125.8
215.2
32.3%
101.0
2016
$162.2
1,318.9
210.9
768.5
2015
$646.1
479.7
(367.2)
($2.83)
113.5
127.9
19.8%
95.2
At December 31,
2015
$200.7
1,332.5
490.4
421.5
2014
$635.7
477.9
(1,186.9)
($11.59)
53.5
92.0
14.5%
64.2
2014
$270.9
1,436.6
468.5
554.3
(1) Midpoint of production and 60:1 all-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) per AgEqOz guidance as published by Coeur on February 8, 2017. See non-GAAP reconciliation tables in Item 7 of the Form 10-K included with
this Annual Report. Reconciliation table for average spot AISC per AgEqOz guidance based on 70:1 silver-to-gold ratio included on the inside back cover of this Annual Report. Adjusted EBITDA margin is
calculated by dividing adjusted EBITDA by revenues.
(2) Net of unamortized debt, issuance costs, and premium received.
Coeur Mining | 2016 Annual Report 3
Letter to Stockholders
Dear Fellow Stockholders,
2016 marked a key inflection point in Coeur’s strategic repositioning.
We entered the year challenged by depressed gold and silver prices, a highly
levered balance sheet, ambitious capital investment plans, and unfavorable
capital markets conditions. With little margin for error, we successfully executed
on our multi-year strategy to transform Coeur into a lower-cost, high-quality,
profitable precious metals producer.
Central to this strategy, we made significant progress on our high-return
organic growth initiatives. At our Palmarejo silver-gold complex in Mexico,
we completed the transition to 100% underground mining from two new,
high-grade deposits - Guadalupe and Independencia. We plan to accelerate
the mining rates at these deposits during 2017, which is expected to lead
to silver and gold production increases of over 50% this year and, more
importantly, significantly higher cash flow. At our Rochester mine in Nevada,
we commenced construction of an expanded leach pad, which remains
on-schedule and on-budget with expected completion in the third quarter. This
project represents the culmination of several years of investment at Rochester
to position our longest-running operation for strong, sustainable cash flow.
At our Kensington gold mine in Alaska, we advanced development of the
high-grade Jualin deposit and are on schedule to commence production
from this important new ore source late this year. With Jualin contributing
higher-grade ore, we expect Kensington to join Palmarejo and Rochester
as sources of strong and sustained cash flows for the Company. Further
supplementing the cash flow from these assets is the Wharf gold mine in
South Dakota, which we acquired in February of 2015 for $99 million. In 2016
alone, Wharf generated $58 million of free cash flow1 for the Company, which
demonstrates the high rate of return on this acquisition.
Concurrent with these development and portfolio enhancing efforts, we
maintained strong operating discipline, resulting in record production levels and
a continuation of our industry-leading cost reductions. Coupled with modest
improvements to gold and silver prices, we generated positive net income of
$55 million in 2016 and adjusted EBITDA2 of $215 million, an increase of
nearly $90 million, or 68%, year-over-year.
(1) Free cash flow calculated as cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures and gold production royalty payments.
(2) See non-GAAP reconciliation tables in Item 7 of the Form 10-K included with this Annual Report.
Mitchell J. Krebs,
President & Chief Executive Officer
4 Coeur Mining | 2016 Annual Report
This strong operational and financial performance also provided critical
support as we delivered on our commitment to reduce leverage and strengthen
our balance sheet. Over the course of 2016, we reduced debt by $280 million,
or nearly 60%, resulting in significant expected annual interest savings and
greater balance sheet flexibility.
Over the past several months, our more conservative balance sheet has
allowed us to allocate more capital to future growth initiatives, including
an expansion of our exploration program. Following years of limited explora-
tion investment due to a declining metal price environment and a focus on
repositioning our core assets, we increased our exploration budget in
mid-2016 and expanded it further in early 2017, prioritizing high-return,
near-mine exploration and mine life extensions.
Our expanded exploration efforts have already started to yield results.
Earlier this year, we reported a 40% increase in silver reserves and a 70%
increase in gold reserves at our Rochester mine from targeted drilling that
was completed during 2016. In 2017, the largest portion of our exploration
budget is planned to be spent at Palmarejo, followed by Kensington and the La
Preciosa exploration project located in Mexico. While ongoing drilling efforts
will take time and analysis before translating into mineralized material and
potential reserves, we believe there is significant exploration upside within our
existing portfolio of assets.
The past year also upheld the Company’s enduring commitment to health
and safety, with lost-time and reportable incidents declining by 79% and
68%, respectively, since 2010. Beyond these measures, we redefined
our companywide vision for corporate stewardship and introduced greater
structure to our investments in wellness and community partnership. As an
employer of over 2,000 people across the Americas, Coeur recognizes the
importance of demonstrating responsibility to each of its stakeholders.
In 2017, gold and silver prices remain volatile and macroeconomic and
geopolitical environments uncertain, yet we believe we are better positioned
to face these challenges today than ever before in our Company’s history. This
more resilient posture has been made possible by the hard work and thoughtful
contributions of the team here at Coeur. Our employees’ dedication, strong work
ethic, and ambition have reinvigorated our culture and invigorated our pursuit
of a higher standard in all areas of our business. It remains a great honor to lead
such a talented and driven team as the Company’s President and CEO as we
continue to transform Coeur into the leader in precious metals mining. I’d also
like to express my appreciation and gratitude to the Chairman of the Board for
his support and leadership as well as to the Board of Directors for their guidance
and encouragement, and – most importantly – to our investors whom we all
proudly serve.
Mitchell J. Krebs
President & Chief Executive Officer
Coeur Mining | 2016 Annual Report 5
Balanced Portfolio of Precious Metals Mines
Palmarejo, Mexico
2016 Production
4.4M oz silver
73,913 oz gold
2017E1 Production Guidance
6.5 - 7.0M oz silver
110,000 - 120,000 oz gold
2016 Proven and Probable Reserves2
40.8M oz silver, 592,000 oz gold
2016 Mineralized Material2
4.9M tons
3.52 oz/t silver, 0.048 oz/t gold
• Began production in 2009 as an open pit and underground mine
• Transitioned to 100% underground mining from two new, high-grade
deposits – Guadalupe and Independencia
• Costs applicable to sales (“CAS”) per average spot AgEqOz1 decreased
34%1 from 2014 to 2016
• Mining rates expected to accelerate to 4,500 tpd by year-end 2017
• Silver and gold production expected to increase over 50% from 2016
to 20171
• Strong exploration focus on conversion and expansion of mineralized material
• New Franco-Nevada gold stream agreement expected to significantly
improve cash flows going forward
(1) Guidance as published by Coeur on February 8, 2017. Gold and silver equivalence assumes silver-to-gold ratio of 60:1 unless otherwise noted. See non-GAAP reconciliation tables in Item 7 of the Form 10-K
included with this Annual Report.
(2) For additional information regarding mineral reserves and mineralized material, see Item 1 - Cautionary Statement Regarding Disclosure of Mineral Properties and Item 2 - Proven and Probable Mineral
Reserves and – Mineralized Material in the Form 10-K included with this Annual Report.
6 Coeur Mining | 2016 Annual Report
Rochester, Nevada, U.S.
2016 Production
4.6M oz silver
50,751 oz gold
2017E1 Production Guidance
4.2 - 4.7M oz silver
47,000 - 52,000 oz gold
Kensington, Alaska, U.S.
2016 Production
124,331 oz gold
2017E1 Production Guidance
120,000 - 125,000 oz gold
• First commenced operations in 1986
• Tons placed in 2016 increased 19% year-
over-year to 19.6 million tons, the highest
level since operations began
• Achieved 64%3 AgEqOz1 production growth
and a 46%4 reduction in unit costs
between 2013 and 2016
• Year-end 2016 silver and gold reserves
increased over 40% and nearly 70%,
respectively, nearly doubling mine life2
• Construction on Stage IV leach pad
expansion began in July 2016; construction
remains on-schedule and on-budget, with
completion expected in 3Q 2017
2016 Proven and Probable Reserves2
112.0M oz silver, 803,000 oz gold
2016 Mineralized Material2
69.5M tons
0.56 oz/t silver, 0.003 oz/t gold
• Underground gold mine in production since
2010
• 50% increase in mill throughput since
2012
• 16% reduction in CAS per AuOz1 from
2014 to 2016
• Initial production from nearby high-grade
Jualin discovery expected in late 2017
• Exploration efforts targeting expansion
and conversion of mineralized material at
Kensington Main, Jualin, and Raven
2016 Proven and Probable Reserves2
497,000 oz gold
2016 Mineralized Material2
3.1M tons, 0.279 oz/t gold
Note: AuOz defined as gold ounce(s).
(1) Guidance as published by Coeur on February 8, 2017. Gold and silver equivalence assumes silver-to-gold ratio of 60:1 unless otherwise noted. See non-GAAP reconciliation tables in Item 7 of the Form 10-K
included with this Annual Report.
(2) For additional information regarding mineral reserves and mineralized material, see Item 1 - Cautionary Statement Regarding Disclosure of Mineral Properties and Item 2 - Proven and Probable Mineral
Reserves and – Mineralized Material in the Form 10-K included with this Annual Report.
(3) Based on silver equivalent production of 7.6M ounces for full-year 2016 compared to 4.7M ounces for full-year 2013.
(4) Based on mining costs per ton of $1.24 for the full year 2016 compared to $2.30 for the full-year 2013.
Coeur Mining | 2016 Annual Report 7
Wharf, South Dakota, U.S.
• Acquired in 2015 for $99 million from
Goldcorp
• Coeur’s lowest cost operation and largest
source of FCF3, generating over $86M
since acquisition through 2016
• Improved plant recovery rates nearly 20%
since the acquisition
• 14% reduction in CAS per AuEqOz1 from
2015 to 2016
• 2017 production expected to decrease
due to anticipated completion of mining
at the higher-grade Golden Reward
deposit in mid-2017
• 2017 CAS per AuEqOz1 expected to
increase as a result of lower production,
higher tons mined compared to 2016,
and one-time plant maintenance expenses
San Bartolomé, Bolivia
• One of the world’s largest pure silver
mines
• Production commenced in 2008
• CAS per AgOz1 ounce decreased 4% from
2014 to 2016
• Straightforward operation due to free-
digging surface mining techniques (no
drilling or blasting)
• Sourcing higher-grade, lower-cost ore from
local third parties to increase mill feed
grade, reduce costs, and improve cash
flows
• Processing enhancements have improved
recoveries over the past several years
2016 Production
109,175 oz gold
2017E1 Production Guidance
85,000 - 90,000 oz gold
2016 Proven and Probable Reserves2
639,000 oz gold
2016 Mineralized Material2
4.9M tons, 0.026 oz/t gold
2016 Production
5.5M oz silver
2017E1 Production Guidance
5.4 - 5.9M oz silver
2016 Proven and Probable Reserves2
21.1M oz silver
2016 Mineralized Material2
1.9M tons, 2.17 oz/t silver
Note: AgOz and AuEqOz defined as silver ounce(s) and gold equivalent ounce(s), respectively.
(1) Guidance as published by Coeur on February 8, 2017. Gold and silver equivalence assumes silver-to-gold ratio of 60:1 unless otherwise noted.
See non-GAAP reconciliation tables in Item 7 of the Form 10-K included with this Annual Report.
(2) For additional information regarding mineral reserves and mineralized material, see Item 1 - Cautionary Statement Regarding Disclosure of Mineral Properties and Item 2 - Proven and Probable Mineral
Reserves and – Mineralized Material in the Form 10-K included with this Annual Report.
(3) Free cash flow calculated as cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures and gold production royalty payments.
8 Coeur Mining | 2016 Annual Report
Gold mine
Silver mine
Gold & Silver mine
Coeur Mining | 2016 Annual Report 9
KensingtonRochesterWharf Palmarejo San Bartolomé Endeavor Board of Directors
Robert E. Mellor
Chairman of the Board, Coeur Mining, Inc.
Director, CalAtlantic Group and
Monro Muffler/Brake, Inc.
Mitchell J. Krebs
President and
Chief Executive Officer, Coeur Mining, Inc
Linda L. Adamany
Director, Amec Foster Wheeler
and Leucadia National Corp.,
Former Executive Committee Member, BP
Kevin S. Crutchfield
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Contura Energy, Inc., Chairman, National
Mining Association
Sebastian Edwards
Henry Ford II Professor of
International Business Economics,
Anderson Graduate School of
Management, University of California,
Los Angeles
Randolph E. Gress
Retired Chief Executive Officer and
Director, Innophos Holdings, Inc.
John H. Robinson
Chairman, Hamilton Ventures LLC,
Director, Alliance Resource Management
GP, LLC, Federal Home Loan Bank of Des
Moines and Olsson Associates
J. Kenneth Thompson
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Pacific Star Energy, LLC, Director, Pioneer
Natural Resources, Tetra Tech and
Alaska Air Group, Inc.
Executive Team
Mitchell J. Krebs
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Peter C. Mitchell
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Frank L. Hanagarne, Jr.
Senior Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
Casey M. Nault
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
Hans Rasmussen
Senior Vice President, Exploration
Humberto Rada
President, Manquiri
Emilie C. Schouten
Vice President, Human Resources
10 Coeur Mining | 2016 Annual Report
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-8641
COEUR MINING, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
104 S. Michigan Ave. Suite 900
Chicago, IL
(Address of principal executive offices)
82-0109423
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
60603
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (312) 489-5800
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
No
No
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at
which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s
most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
No
$1,707,877,264
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of February 6, 2017, 181,055,852 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Certain information called for by Part III of the Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for
the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year
covered by this report.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
COEUR MINING, INC.
FORM 10-K
INDEX
PART I
Item 1.
Business
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Properties
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11. Executive Compensation
PART III
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
SIGNATURES
3
12
22
23
32
32
32
35
36
56
58
103
103
103
104
104
104
104
104
105
107
108
2 Item 1.
Business
INTRODUCTION
PART I
Coeur Mining, Inc. (“Coeur”,“the Company”, or "we") is a gold and silver producer with mines located in the United
States, Mexico, and Bolivia and exploration projects in Mexico and Argentina. The Company operates the Palmarejo complex,
the Rochester, Kensington, Wharf, and San Bartolomé mines, and also owns Coeur Capital, which is primarily comprised of the
Endeavor silver stream. The Company’s principal sources of revenue are its operating mines and, to a lesser extent, the Endeavor
silver stream.
Coeur was incorporated as an Idaho corporation in 1928 under the name Coeur d'Alene Mines Corporation. On May 16,
2013, Coeur changed its state of incorporation from the State of Idaho to the State of Delaware and changed its name to Coeur
Mining, Inc.
OVERVIEW OF MINING PROPERTIES AND INTERESTS
The Company’s operating properties and interests are described below:
• Coeur owns 100% of Coeur Mexicana S.A. de C.V. ("Coeur Mexicana"), which has operated the underground and surface
Palmarejo silver and gold mine (the “Palmarejo mine”) in Mexico since 2009. Coeur Mexicana controls a large land
position around its existing operations, including the adjacent San Miguel project acquired from Paramount Gold and
Silver Corp. ("Paramount") in April 2015. The combined property now consists of (1) the Palmarejo mine and mill; (2)
the Guadalupe underground mine, located about 8 kilometers southeast of the Palmarejo mine; (3) the Independencia
underground mine, located approximately 800 meters northeast of the Guadalupe underground mine, and (4) other nearby
deposits and exploration targets (together, the “Palmarejo complex”). The Palmarejo complex produced 4.4 million ounces
of silver and 73,913 ounces of gold in 2016.
In 2009, Coeur Mexicana entered into a gold production royalty with a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada Corporation covering
50% of life of mine gold production for the portion of the Palmarejo complex owned by Coeur Mexicana prior to completion
of the Paramount acquisition (the “Coeur Mexicana Property”). In July 2016 the gold production royalty terminated
effective upon completion of a minimum ounce delivery requirement and, subsequently, a new gold stream agreement
with a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada Corporation became effective.
• Coeur owns 100% of Coeur Rochester, Inc. ("Coeur Rochester"), which has operated the Rochester mine, a silver and
gold surface mining operation located in northwestern Nevada, since 1986. The Rochester mine produced 4.6 million
ounces of silver and 50,751 ounces of gold in 2016. Coeur Rochester is obligated to pay a 3.4% net smelter returns
("NSR") royalty on up to 39.4 million silver equivalent ounces produced and sold from a portion of the Rochester mine.
• Coeur owns 100% of Coeur Alaska, Inc. ("Coeur Alaska"), which has operated the Kensington mine, an underground
gold mine located north of Juneau, Alaska since 2010. Kensington produced 124,331 ounces of gold in 2016.
• Coeur owns 100% of Wharf Resources (U.S.A.) Inc. ("Wharf"), which operates the Wharf mine, an open-pit gold mine
located near Lead, South Dakota. The Wharf mine is located in the Black Hills mining district of South Dakota and has
been in production for over 30 years, during which it has produced over 2.1 million ounces of gold. Coeur acquired
Wharf in February 2015 from Goldcorp Inc. for cash consideration of $99.4 million. The Wharf mine produced 109,175
ounces of gold in 2016.
• Coeur owns 100% of Empresa Minera Manquiri S.A. ("Manquiri"), a Bolivian company that controls the mining rights
for the San Bartolomé mine, which is a surface silver mine in Bolivia where Coeur commenced commercial production
in 2008. The San Bartolomé mine produced 5.5 million ounces of silver in 2016.
• Coeur owns 100% of Coeur Capital, Inc. (“Coeur Capital”), which holds the Endeavor silver stream. The silver stream
arrangement, entered into in 2005 allows Coeur to buy 100% of silver production up to 20.0 million ounces from the
Endeavor mine, an underground zinc, lead, and silver mine which has been in production since 1983 operated by Cobar
Operations Pty. Limited, for an operating cost contribution of $1.00 for each ounce of payable silver, indexed annually
for inflation, plus a further increment when the silver price exceeds $7.00 per ounce. The Endeavor mine produced 0.2
million ounces of silver in 2016. At December 31, 2016, the Company has received a total of 6.2 million ounces under
the stream agreement. Coeur Capital also holds other non-producing royalties and strategic investments.
• Coeur owns 100% of the La Preciosa silver-gold exploration project in the State of Durango, Mexico.
3
• Coeur owns 100% of the Joaquin silver-gold exploration project located in the Santa Cruz province of southern Argentina.
In January 2017, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Joaquin silver-gold exploration project for total
consideration of $25.0 million. The Company will also retain a 2.0% net smelter returns ("NSR") royalty on the Joaquin
project. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2017, subject to customary closing conditions.
The Company also has interests in exploration stage properties located in the United States, Chile, Argentina, Bolivia,
and Mexico which have no declared resources or mineralized material. For financial and geographic information regarding our
operating segments, see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.
SILVER AND GOLD PRICES
The Company’s operating results are substantially dependent upon the market prices of silver and gold, which fluctuate
widely. The volatility of such prices is illustrated in the following table, which sets forth the high and low prices of silver based
on the London Bullion Market Association ("LBMA") Silver Price, formerly known as the silver fix, and gold based on the PM
LBMA Gold Price, formerly known as the PM gold fix:
2016
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
High
Low
High
$
$
20.71
1,366
$
$
13.58
1,077
$18.23
$1,296
Low
$13.71
$1,049
High
$22.05
$1,385
Low
$15.28
$1,142
Silver
Gold
MARKETING
All of the Company's mining operations produce silver and/or gold doré except the Kensington and Wharf mines, which
produce a gold concentrate. The Endeavor mine, in which Coeur Capital holds a silver stream, produces lead and zinc concentrates
with a high silver content, from which the Company recovers its payable silver. The Company uses a geographically diverse group
of third-party refiners and smelters in the United States, China, and Japan.
The Company's doré, as well as the concentrate product produced by the Wharf mine, is refined into gold and silver
bullion according to benchmark standards set by the LBMA, which regulates the acceptable requirements for bullion traded in the
London precious metals markets. The Company then sells its silver and gold bullion to multi-national banks, bullion trading
houses, and refiners across the globe. The Company has eleven trading counterparties at December 31, 2016. The Company's
sales of doré and concentrate product produced by the Wharf mine amounted to approximately 77%, 74%, and 63% of total metal
sales for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. Generally, the loss of a single bullion trading
counterparty would not adversely affect the Company due to the liquidity of the markets and availability of alternative trading
counterparties.
The Company's concentrate produced by the Kensington mine is sold to smelters under purchase and sale agreements,
and the smelters pay the Company for the gold and silver recovered from the concentrates. The concentrate was sold to two smelters
at December 31, 2016. The Company's sales of concentrate produced by the Kensington mine amounted to approximately 23%,
26%, and 37% of total metal sales for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. While the loss of a
smelter may have a material adverse effect if alternate smelters are not available or if the failure to engage a new smelter results
in a delay in the sale or purchase of Kensington concentrate, the Company believes that there is sufficient global capacity available
to address the loss of a smelter.
HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company’s strategy is to provide stockholders with exposure to silver and gold prices by selling silver and gold
production at market prices. The Company may enter into short-term derivative contracts to protect the selling price for certain
anticipated silver and gold production and to manage risks associated with foreign currencies. For additional information see
"Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" and Note 12 -- Derivative Financial Instruments in the
notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
General
The Company’s activities are subject to extensive federal, state and local laws governing the protection of the environment,
prospecting, development, production, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, mine safety, toxic substances, protection of
endangered, protected or other specified species and other matters. The costs to comply with such regulatory requirements are
substantial and possible future legislation and regulations could cause additional expense, capital expenditures, restrictions and
delays in the development and continued operation of the Company’s properties, the extent of which cannot be predicted. In the
context of environmental permitting, including the approval of reclamation plans, the Company must comply with known standards
and regulations which may entail significant costs and delays. Although the Company has been recognized for its commitment to
environmental responsibility and believes it is in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations, amendments to
current laws and regulations, more stringent application or interpretation of these laws and regulations through judicial review, or
administrative action or the adoption of new laws could have a material adverse effect upon the Company and its results of
operations.
Estimated future reclamation costs are based primarily on legal and regulatory requirements. At December 31, 2016,
$97.4 million was accrued for reclamation costs relating to currently developed and producing properties. The Company is also
involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former mining activities. Based upon the
Company’s best estimate of its liabilities for these items, $1.9 million was accrued at December 31, 2016. These amounts are
included in Reclamation on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Federal Environmental Laws
Certain mining wastes from extraction and beneficiation of ores would be considered hazardous waste under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and state law equivalents, but are currently exempt from the extensive set of
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulations governing hazardous waste. If the Company’s mine wastes were treated
as hazardous waste under RCRA or such wastes resulted in operations being designated as “Superfund” sites under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) or state law equivalents for cleanup,
material expenditures could be required for the construction of additional waste disposal facilities, for other remediation
expenditures, or for natural resource damages. Under CERCLA, any present or past owners or operators of a Superfund site
generally may be held liable and may be forced to undertake remedial cleanup action or to pay for the government’s cleanup efforts.
Such owners or operators may also be liable to governmental entities for the cost of damages to natural resources, which may be
substantial. Additional regulations or requirements may also be imposed upon the Company’s operations, tailings, and waste
disposal areas, as well as upon mine closure, in Alaska, Nevada, and South Dakota under federal and state environmental laws
and regulations, including, without limitation, CERCLA, the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act and state law equivalents. The
Company has reviewed and considered current federal legislation relating to climate change and does not believe it to have a
material effect on its operations. Future changes in federal or state laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect upon
the Company and its results of operations.
U.S. Mining Legislation
A portion of the Company’s U.S. mining properties are on unpatented mining claims on federal lands. Legislation has
been introduced regularly in the U.S. Congress over the last decade to change the Mining Law of 1872 as amended (the "Mining
Law"), under which the Company holds these unpatented mining claims. It is possible that the Mining Law may be amended or
replaced by less favorable legislation in the future. Previously proposed legislation contained a production royalty obligation, new
environmental standards and conditions, additional reclamation requirements and extensive new procedural steps which would
likely result in delays in permitting. The ultimate content of future proposed legislation, if enacted, is uncertain. If a royalty on
unpatented mining claims were imposed, the profitability of the Company’s U.S. operations could be materially adversely affected.
In addition, the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") have considered revising regulations
governing operations under the Mining Law on federal lands they administer, which, if implemented, may result in additional
procedures and environmental conditions and standards on those lands. The majority of the Company’s operations are either outside
of the United States or on private patented lands and would be unaffected by potential legislation.
Any such reform of the Mining Law or BLM and U.S. Forest Service regulations thereunder could increase the costs of
mining activities on unpatented mining claims, or could materially impair the ability of the Company to develop or continue
operations which derive ore from federal lands, and as a result, could have an adverse effect on the Company and its results of
operations. Until such time, if any, as new reform legislation or regulations are enacted, the ultimate effects and costs of compliance
on the Company cannot be estimated.
5
Foreign Government Regulations
Bolivia, where the San Bartolomé mine is located, and Mexico, where the Palmarejo complex and the La Preciosa
exploration project are located, have both adopted laws and guidelines for environmental permitting that are similar to those in
effect in the United States. The permitting process requires a thorough study to determine the baseline condition of the mining site
and surrounding area, an environmental impact analysis, and proposed mitigation measures to minimize and offset the
environmental impact of mining operations. The Company has received all permits required to operate the San Bartolomé mine
and Palmarejo complex as currently conducted, and has received all permits necessary for the exploration activities being conducted
at its other non-U.S. properties.
Maintenance of Claims
United States
At mining properties in the United States, including the Rochester, Kensington, and Wharf mines, operations are conducted
upon both patented and unpatented mining claims. Pursuant to applicable federal law, it is necessary to pay to the Secretary of the
Interior, on or before September 1st of each year, a claim maintenance fee of $155 per unpatented federal claim. This claim
maintenance fee is in lieu of the assessment work requirement contained in applicable mining laws. In addition, Nevada holders
of unpatented federal mining claims are required to pay the county recorder of the county in which the claim is situated an annual
fee of $10.00 per claim. In South Dakota, holders of unpatented federal mining claims are required to pay the county recorder of
the county in which the claim is situated an annual fee of $0.25 per claim. In Alaska, the Company is required to pay a variable,
annual rental fee for State claims and a State upland mining lease based on the age of the claim or claims converted to the upland
mining lease. Annual labor must also be performed or an annual payment in lieu of annual labor must be paid to the State of
Alaska for State claims and upland mining leases. No maintenance fees are payable for federal patented claims. Patented claims
are similar to land held by an owner who is entitled to the entire interest in the property with unconditional power of disposition
and are subject to local ad valorem property taxes.
Mexico
In order to carry out mining activities in Mexico, the Company is required to obtain a mining concession from the General
Bureau of Mining, which belongs to the Ministry of Economy of the Federal Government, or be assigned previously granted
concession rights, and both must be recorded with the Public Registry of Mining. In addition, mining works may have to be
authorized by other authorities when performed in certain areas, including ejidos (communal owners of land recognized by the
federal laws in Mexico), villages, dams, channels, general communications ways, submarine shelves of islands, islets and reefs,
marine beds and subsoil and federal maritime-terrestrial zones. Reports have to be filed with the General Bureau of Mining in
May of each year, evidencing previous calendar year mining investment and works. Annual reports, detailing production results,
must be submitted by January 30 for each concession bearing production and all concessions over six years of age. Bi-annual
mining duties are payable in January and July of each year and, based on amount of surface of each mining concession, holders
of mining concessions must also pay annually and no later than the last business day of March a special mining fee based on 7.5%
of the income before interest and certain other permitted deductions derived from the transfer or sale of minerals, plus 0.5% of
gross revenues from sales of gold, silver and platinum. Failure to pay any of these duties and submit the required reports could
lead to cancellation of the concessions. Upon expiration or cancellation of the concession, certain obligations remain, such as filing
technical reports and ground support.
6
Bolivia
The Bolivian state owns the mining rights at San Bartolomé. The Bolivian state-owned mining organization, Corporación
Minera de Bolivia (“COMIBOL”), is the underlying manager of all of the mining rights relating to the San Bartolomé mine.
Bolivia’s ownership derives from the Supreme Decree 3196 issued in October 1952, when the government nationalized most of
the mines in Potosí. COMIBOL has leased the mining rights for the surface silver and tin bearing sediment to several Potosí
cooperatives. The cooperatives have subleased their mining rights to Coeur’s subsidiary, Manquiri, through a series of “joint
venture” contracts (“JV Agreements”). In addition to those agreements with the cooperatives, Manquiri holds additional mining
rights under lease agreements directly with COMIBOL. All of Manquiri’s mining and surface rights collectively constitute the
San Bartolomé mine. In response to conflicts between local mining cooperatives and the Bolivian government, on September 1,
2016, the Bolivian government issued Supreme Decree No. 2891, and on October 24, 2016, Law 845, which impose tighter
restrictions on mining cooperatives, including reversion of mining areas leased to the mining cooperatives by COMIBOL that are
subject to JV Agreements, leases or subleases with third parties to the Bolivian state. Although Bolivian government officials have
made public statements that the decree will not impact Manquiri’s ability to continue operations in the areas subject to the JV
Agreements and the JV Agreements continue to be formally in existence, any cancellation of leases between COMIBOL and the
applicable mining cooperatives and/or the JV Agreements will require negotiation of and entry into contracts directly with
COMIBOL to continue mining operations at the affected areas. In January 2017, an interim permit was granted to Manquiri allowing
for continuation of mining operations in the areas subject to the JV Agreements pending negotiation of contracts directly with
COMIBOL. For additional information regarding the maintenance of its claims to the San Bartolomé mine, see "Item 2. Properties
- Silver and Gold Mining Properties, Bolivia-San Bartolomé."
Argentina
In Argentina, minerals are owned by the provincial governments, which impose a maximum 3% mine-mouth royalty on
mineral production. The first step in acquiring mining rights is filing an exploration permit, or cateo, which gives exclusive
prospecting rights for the requested area for a period of time, generally up to three years. The maximum size of each cateo is
10,000 hectares; a maximum of 20 cateos, or 200,000 hectares, can be held by a single entity in any one province.
The holder of a cateo has exclusive right to establish a discovery concession ("Manifestacion de Descubrimiento" or
“MD”) on that cateo, but MDs can also be set without a cateo on any land not covered by another party's cateo. MDs are filed as
either a vein or disseminated discovery. A square protection zone can be declared around the discovery of up to 840 hectares for
a vein MD, or up to 7,000 hectares for a disseminated MD. The protection zone grants the discoverer exclusive rights for an
indefinite period, during which the discoverer must provide an annual report presenting a program of exploration work and
investments related to the protection zone. An MD can be upgraded to an exploitation concession ("Concesion de Explotacion"
or "Mina"), which gives the holder the right to begin commercial extraction of minerals.
Australia
In Australia, minerals in the ground are owned by the state until severed from the ground through mining operations. At
the Endeavor mining property operated by CBH, operations are conducted on designated mining leases issued by the relevant state
government mining department. Mining leases are issued for a specific term and include a range of environmental and other
conditions including the payment of production royalties, annual lease fees and the use of cash or a bank guarantee as security for
reclamation liabilities. The amounts required to be paid to secure reclamation liabilities are determined on a case by case basis. In
addition, according to public sources, CBH holds a range of exploration titles and permits, which are also issued by the respective
state government mining departments for specified terms and require payment of annual fees and completion of designated
expenditure programs to maintain title.
EMPLOYEES
The number of full-time employees of the Company at December 31, 2016 was:
U.S. Corporate and Other
Wharf Mine
Rochester Mine
Kensington Mine
San Bartolomé Mine(1)
Palmarejo Complex
Total
(1) The Company maintains a labor agreement in South America with Sindicato de Trabajadorés Mineras de la Empresa Manquiri S.A. at the San Bartolomé
mine in Bolivia. The San Bartolomé mine labor agreement is in effect for 2017. At December 31, 2016, approximately 11% of the Company’s global
labor force was covered by collective bargaining agreements, consisting entirely of employees at San Bartolomé.
65
214
302
330
351
825
2,087
7
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS
Management believes the following strengths provide the Company with significant competitive advantages:
Strong track record of developing and operating mines
The Company has successfully acquired, developed, and operated a portfolio of operating mines since its founding in
1928. In 2016, we produced 14.8 million ounces of silver and 358,170 ounces of gold at costs applicable to sales of $11.87 per
silver equivalent ounce1 ($11.12 per average spot silver equivalent ounce) at primary silver mines and $705 per gold equivalent
ounce1 at primary gold mines.
Silver Production
Gold Production
Costs Applicable to Sales per Silver Equivalent Oz1
Costs Applicable to Sales per Gold Equivalent Oz1
(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.
Operating and commodity diversity
The Company's silver and gold production comes from six operating mines located in four countries. The Company
operates the Palmarejo silver and gold complex in Mexico, the San Bartolomé silver mine in Bolivia, the Kensington gold mine
in Alaska, the Wharf gold mine in South Dakota, and the Rochester silver and gold mine in Nevada. In addition, the Company
owns a silver stream on the Endeavor mine in Australia.
8
The Company's metal sales breakdown by operating mine and metal is set out below:
2016 Silver Sales by Mine (millions of ounces)
2016 Gold Sales by Mine (ounces)
Experienced management team
The Company has built a high-caliber management team of devoted professionals with extensive mining industry expertise.
President and Chief Executive Officer, Mitchell Krebs, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Peter Mitchell, and
Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Frank Hanagarne, each has significant experience in the mining industry. The
board of directors also brings diverse industry backgrounds and a depth of professional experience to the Company.
Capitalizing on prior development program
The Company has spent significant capital in commissioning or expanding its five 100%-owned operating mines. The
following table provides the percentage contribution to the Company’s total revenues:
Mine/Location
Palmarejo Complex, Mexico
Kensington Mine, United States
Rochester Mine, United States
Wharf Mine, United States(1)
San Bartolomé Mine, Bolivia
Coeur Capital(2)
Martha Mine, Argentina(3)
(1) Acquired February 2015.
(2) Primarily the Endeavor silver stream (Australia).
(3) Assets related to the Martha Mine sold May 2016.
Percentage of Total Revenues
For The Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
21%
22
21
21
14
1
—
100%
27%
23
22
13
13
2
—
100%
38%
22
20
—
19
1
—
100%
43%
20
16
—
19
2
—
100%
49%
12
15
—
20
2
2
100%
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains numerous forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) relating to the Company’s gold and silver mining business, including statements
regarding potential acquisitions and dispositions including the pending sale of the Joaquin project in Argentina, mineral reserve
and mineralized material estimates, exploration efforts, drilling, operations at Wharf, development at Kensington and Palmarejo,
expansion at Rochester, estimated production, costs, capital expenditures, expenses, metals prices, sufficiency of assets, ability to
discharge liabilities, liquidity management, financing needs, environmental compliance expenditures, risk management strategies,
operational excellence, cost reduction initiatives, capital discipline, and initiatives to maximize net cash flow, enhance revenues,
reduce operating and non-operating costs, and manage working capital efficiently. Such forward-looking statements are identified
by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “hopes,” “may,” “should,” “plan,” “projected,” “contemplates,”
“anticipates” or similar words. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include (i) the
risk factors set forth below under Item 1A and in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations under Item 7, (ii) the risks and hazards inherent in the mining business (including risks inherent in developing large-
scale mining projects, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, weather or geologically related conditions), (iii) changes in the
market prices of gold and silver and a sustained lower price environment, (iv) the uncertainties inherent in the Company’s
9
production, exploratory and developmental activities, including risks relating to permitting and regulatory delays, ground conditions
and grade variability, (v) any future labor disputes or work stoppages (involving the Company and its subsidiaries or third parties),
(vi) the uncertainties inherent in the estimation of gold and silver reserves and mineralized material, (vii) changes that could result
from the Company’s future acquisition of new mining properties or businesses, (viii) reliance on third parties to operate certain
mines where the Company owns silver production and reserves, (ix) the loss of access to any third-party smelter to whom the
Company markets silver and gold, (xx) the effects of environmental and other governmental regulations, (xi) the risks inherent in
the ownership or operation of or investment in mining properties or businesses in foreign countries, and (xii) the Company’s ability
to raise additional financing necessary to conduct its business, make payments or refinance its debt. Readers are cautioned not to
put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-
looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF MINERAL PROPERTIES
Reserves, Resources and Mineralized Material
Coeur Mining, Inc. is subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and applicable Canadian securities laws,
and as a result we report our mineral reserves according to two different standards. Canadian reporting requirements for disclosure
of mineral properties are governed by National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”).
The definitions of NI 43-101 are adopted from those given by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum. U.S.
reporting requirements, however, are governed by Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Industry Guide 7 (“Guide 7”).
Both sets of reporting standards have similar goals in terms of conveying an appropriate level of confidence in the disclosures
being reported, but embody different approaches and definitions. Under Guide 7, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve”
unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the
time the reserve determination is made.
In our public filings in Canada and in certain other announcements not filed with the SEC, we disclose measured, indicated
and inferred resources, each as defined in NI 43-101, in addition to our mineral reserves. U.S. investors are cautioned that, while
the terms “measured mineral resources,” “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources” are recognized and required
by Canadian securities laws, Guide 7 does not recognize them. The estimation of measured resources and indicated resources
involve greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic feasibility than the estimation of proven and probable reserves, and
therefore U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated resources will ever be converted
into Guide 7 compliant reserves. The estimation of inferred resources involves far greater uncertainty as to their existence and
economic viability than the estimation of other categories of resources, and therefore it cannot be assumed that all or any part of
inferred resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Therefore, investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part
of inferred resources exist, or that they can be mined legally or economically.
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Form 10-K") and in our other filings with the SEC, we modify our estimates made
in compliance with NI 43-101 to conform to Guide 7 for reporting in the United States. In this Form 10-K, we use the term
“mineralized material” to describe mineralization in mineral deposits that do not constitute “reserves” under U.S. standards.
“Mineralized material” is substantially equivalent to measured and indicated mineral resources (exclusive of reserves) as disclosed
for reporting purposes in Canada, except that the SEC only permits issuers to report "mineralized material" in tonnage and average
grade without reference to contained ounces. We provide disclosure of mineralized material to allow a means of comparing our
projects to those of other companies in the mining industry, many of which are Canadian and report pursuant to NI 43-101, and
to comply with applicable disclosure requirements. We caution you not to assume that all or any part of mineralized material will
ever be converted into Guide 7 compliant reserves.
Technical Reports and Qualified Persons
As required by Canadian securities laws, we hereby notify Canadian investors that the scientific and technical information
concerning our mineral projects in this Form 10-K have been reviewed and approved by a “qualified person” under NI 43-101,
namely our Director, Technical Services, Christopher Pascoe. For a description of the key assumptions, parameters and methods
used to estimate mineral reserves included in this Form 10-K, as well as data verification procedures and a general discussion of
the extent to which the estimates may be affected by any known environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political,
marketing or other relevant factors, Canadian investors may view technical reports prepared for each of our properties as filed on
SEDAR at http://www.sedar.com. Neither the technical reports nor the statements of any qualified person filed with the
Canadian securities regulatory authorities are included in, or incorporated by reference in, this Form 10-K. Because the
definitions and standards of NI 43-101 differ from those of Guide 7, investors are cautioned that information contained in reports
prepared pursuant to NI 43-101, like the technical reports, may not be comparable to similar information that we can disclose in
this Form 10-K or the other reports we file with the SEC.
10
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Coeur makes available, on its website (http://www.coeur.com), its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and Proxy Statements, as well as Forms 3, 4 and 5 with respect to its common stock,
including any amendments to any of the foregoing, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed
with the SEC. Copies of Coeur’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, charters of the key committees of the Board of Directors
(Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Environmental, Health, Safety, and Social Responsibility
Committees) and its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer, among others, are also available on the Company’s website. Information contained on the Company’s
website is not a part of this report.
11 Item 1A.
Risk Factors
The Company's results of operations, cash flows and operating costs are highly dependent upon the market prices of silver and
gold and other commodities, which are volatile and beyond the Company's control.
Silver and gold are actively traded commodities, and their prices are volatile. During the twelve months ended
December 31, 2016, the price of silver ranged from a low of $13.58 per ounce to a high of $20.71 per ounce, and the price of gold
ranged from a low of $1,077 per ounce to a high of $1,366 per ounce. The closing market prices of silver and gold on February
7, 2017 were $17.60 per ounce and $1,231 per ounce, respectively.
Silver and gold prices are affected by many factors beyond the Company’s control, including U.S. dollar strength or
weakness, prevailing interest rates and returns on other asset classes, expectations regarding inflation, speculation, global currency
values, governmental decisions regarding precious metals stockpiles, global and regional demand and production, political and
economic conditions and other factors. In addition, Exchange Traded Funds (“ETFs”), which have substantially facilitated the
ability of large and small investors to buy and sell precious metals, have become significant holders of gold and silver. Factors
that are generally understood to contribute to a decline in the prices of silver and gold include a strengthening of the U.S. dollar,
net outflows from gold and silver ETFs, bullion sales by private and government holders and global economic conditions and/or
fiscal policies that negatively impact large consumer markets.
Because the Company derives all of its revenues from sales of silver and gold, its results of operations and cash flows
will fluctuate as the prices of these metals change. A period of significant and sustained lower gold and silver prices would
materially and adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, if market prices for silver and
gold decline further or remain at current or lower levels for a sustained period of time, the Company may have to revise its operating
plans, including reducing operating costs and capital expenditures, terminating or suspending mining operations at one or more
of its properties and discontinuing certain exploration and development plans. The Company may be unable to decrease its costs
in an amount sufficient to offset reductions in revenues, and may continue to incur losses.
Operating costs at the Company’s mines are also affected by the price of input commodities, such as fuel, electricity,
labor, chemical reagents, explosives, steel and concrete. Prices for these input commodities are volatile and can fluctuate due to
conditions that are difficult to predict, including global competition for resources, currency fluctuations, consumer or industrial
demand and other factors. Continued volatility in the prices of commodities and other supplies the Company purchases could lead
to higher costs, which would adversely affect results of operations and cash flows.
The Company’s future growth will depend upon its ability to develop new mines, either through exploration at existing properties
or by acquisition of other mining companies.
Because mines have limited lives based on proven and probable ore reserves, the Company’s ability to achieve significant
additional growth in revenues and cash flows will depend upon success in further developing existing properties and the
opportunistic acquisition or development of new mining properties.
While initial development of major mining properties at Palmarejo, San Bartolomé, Rochester, and Kensington has been
substantially completed, development work continues at Palmarejo, Rochester, and Kensington to expand these mines while
leveraging existing infrastructure. The Company is currently in the process of developing the Guadalupe and Independencia deposits
at the Palmarejo complex and the Jualin deposit at Kensington and has commenced a project to expand leach pad capacity at
Rochester. In addition, the Company has acquired several mining properties in recent years, namely, the La Preciosa silver-gold
exploration project in the state of Durango, Mexico, the Wharf gold mine and the properties held by Paramount, and has expanded
its near-mine exploration program. The Company cannot assure that it will be able to successfully develop existing or new mining
properties or acquire additional mining properties on favorable economic terms or at all.
The Company regularly evaluates and engages in discussions or negotiations regarding acquisition opportunities. Any
transactions that the Company contemplates or pursues would involve risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance with
respect to the timing, likelihood or business effect of any possible transaction. The success of any acquisition will depend upon
the Company’s ability to effectively manage the integration and operations of entities or properties it acquires and to realize other
anticipated benefits. The process of managing acquired businesses may involve unforeseen difficulties and may require a
disproportionate amount of management resources, which may divert management’s focus and resources from other strategic
opportunities and from operational matters during this process.
12
In addition to the above, any acquisition would be accompanied by risks, including:
•
•
•
•
a significant change in commodity or stock prices after the Company has committed to complete the transaction and
established the purchase price or exchange ratio;
a material ore body may prove to be below expectations;
difficulties integrating and assimilating the operations and personnel of any acquired companies, realizing anticipated
synergies and maximizing the financial and strategic position of the combined enterprise, and maintaining uniform
standards, policies and controls across the organization; and
the acquired business or assets may have unknown liabilities which may be significant.
In connection with an acquisition or development of an existing property, the Company may incur indebtedness or issue
equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, resulting in increased interest expense, or dilution of the percentage
ownership of existing stockholders. The Company cannot predict the impact of future acquisitions on the price of its common
stock, or assure that it would be able to obtain any necessary financing on acceptable terms. Unprofitable acquisitions, or additional
indebtedness or issuances of securities in connection with such acquisitions or any mine development, may negatively affect results
of operations.
Finally, the Company’s systems, procedures and controls may be inadequate to support the expansion of our operations
resulting from an acquisition or development of a new mine. The Company’s future operating results could be affected by the
ability of its officers and key employees to manage the changing business conditions and to integrate an acquired business or new
operation into Coeur. There may also be liabilities, such as environmental liabilities, or significant capital expenditures that the
Company failed to discover or have underestimated in connection with any acquisition or development. Any such liabilities or
capital expenditure requirements could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or future
prospects.
The Company is an international company and is exposed to political and social risks associated with its foreign operations
A significant portion of the Company’s revenues are generated by operations outside the United States. Exploration,
development, production and closure activities in many countries are potentially subject to heightened political and social risks
that are beyond the Company’s control and could result in increased costs, capacity constraints and potential disruptions to the
Company's business. These risks include the possible unilateral cancellation or forced renegotiation of contracts in which the
Company, directly or indirectly, may have an interest, unfavorable changes in foreign laws and regulations, royalty and tax increases
(including taxes associated with the import or export of goods), risks associated with the value-added tax (“VAT”) and income tax
refund recovery and collection process, claims by governmental entities or indigenous communities, expropriation or nationalization
of property and other risks arising out of foreign sovereignty over areas in which our operations are conducted. The right to import
and export silver and gold may depend on obtaining certain licenses and quotas, which could be delayed or denied at the discretion
of the relevant regulatory authorities, or could become subject to new taxes or duties imposed by U.S. or foreign jurisdictions,
which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, or future prospects. In addition, the
Company’s rights under local law may be less secure in countries where judicial systems are susceptible to manipulation and
intimidation by government agencies, non-governmental organizations or civic groups.
Any of these developments could require the Company to curtail or terminate operations at its mines, incur significant
costs to renegotiate contracts, meet newly-imposed environmental or other standards, pay greater royalties or higher prices for
labor or services and recognize higher taxes, or experience significant delays or obstacles in the recovery of VAT or income tax
refunds owed, which could materially and adversely affect financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
These risks may be higher in developing countries in which the Company may expand its exploration for and development
of mineral deposits. Potential operations in these areas increase the Company’s exposure to risks of war, local economic conditions,
political disruption, civil disturbance and governmental policies that may disrupt its operations.
The Company’s ongoing and future success depends on developing and maintaining productive relationships with the
communities, including indigenous peoples, and other stakeholders in its operating locations. The Company believes its operations
can provide valuable benefits to surrounding communities, in terms of direct employment, training and skills development and
other benefits associated with ongoing payment of taxes. In addition, the Company seeks to maintain its partnerships and
relationships with local communities and stakeholders in a variety of ways, including in-kind contributions, volunteer time,
sponsorships and donations. Notwithstanding the Company’s ongoing efforts, local communities and stakeholders can become
dissatisfied with its activities or the level of benefits provided, which may result in civil unrest, protests, direct action or campaigns
against it. Any such occurrences could materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
13
The Company’s operations in Bolivia are subject to political risks.
In response to conflicts between local mining cooperatives and the Bolivian government, on September 1, 2016, the
Bolivian government issued Supreme Decree No. 2891, and on October 24, 2016, Law 845, which impose tighter restrictions on
mining cooperatives, including reversion of mining areas leased to the mining cooperatives by COMIBOL that are subject to joint
venture agreements, leases or subleases with third parties to the Bolivian state. The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Manquiri
is currently party to various JV Agreements with local cooperatives and has also entered in to mining contracts directly with
COMIBOL (which are not impacted by the decree). Although Bolivian government officials have made public statements that the
decree will not impact Manquiri’s ability to continue operations in the areas subject to the JV Agreements and the JV Agreements
continue to be formally in existence, any cancellation of leases between COMIBOL and the applicable mining cooperatives and/
or the JV Agreements will require negotiation of and entry into contracts directly with COMIBOL to continue mining operations
at the affected areas, which could have an adverse impact on financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In January
2017, an interim permit was granted to Manquiri allowing for continuation of mining operations in the areas subject to the JV
Agreements pending negotiation of contracts directly with COMIBOL.
The Company has also been assessing the potential effects of the Bolivian mining law enacted in 2014 on its Bolivian
operations but any effects remain uncertain until the regulations implementing the law are accompanied by a new contractual
structure. The law regulates royalties and provides for mining contracts with the government rather than concession holding. If
the regulations promulgated under the new mining law mandate a renegotiation of the terms of our existing contracts with
COMIBOL, this could materially adversely affect the profitability and cash flow of our operations in Bolivia.
In addition, companies in Bolivia are also operating under Law No. 403 of September 18, 2013, and its regulatory Supreme
Decree, which provides for the reversion of mining rights if the Ministry of Mines verifies that a person with mining rights has
not initiated mining activities or developed the mining rights. The contracts with COMIBOL and the cooperatives are excluded
from the application of Law No. 403. In April 2014, Manquiri was served by the Bolivian government with a reversion decision
affecting nine mining rights wholly-owned by Manquiri. The affected area is not in an area of active mining by Manquiri and the
Manquiri’s San Bartolomé operations were not targeted as an area of interest in the decision since all of our past and current mining
activity is performed through our contracts with COMIBOL and the mining cooperatives.
It is also uncertain if any new mining or investment policies or shifts in political attitude may affect mining in Bolivia.
The Company’s operations outside the United States also expose it to economic and operational risks.
The Company’s operations outside the United States also expose it to economic and operational risks. Local economic
conditions can cause shortages of skilled workers and supplies, increase costs and adversely affect the security of operations. In
addition, higher incidences of criminal activity and violence in the area of some of the Company’s foreign operations, including
drug-cartel related violence in Mexico, could adversely affect the Company’s ability to operate in an optimal fashion and may
impose greater risks of theft and greater risks as to personnel and property security. These conditions could lead to lower productivity
and higher costs, which would adversely affect results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, acts of civil disobedience are common in certain of the countries where the Company’s operations are located.
In recent years, many mining companies have been the targets of actions to restrict their legally-entitled access to mining concessions
or property. Such acts of civil disobedience often occur with no warning and can result in significant direct and indirect costs. The
Company cannot provide assurance that there will be no disruptions to site access in the future, which could adversely affect the
Company’s business.
The Company sells silver and gold doré and concentrates in U.S. dollars, but it conducts operations outside the United
States in local currency. Currency exchange movements could also adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.
14
The estimation of ore reserves is imprecise and depends upon subjective factors. Estimated ore reserves may not be realized in
actual production. The Company’s results of operations and financial position may be adversely affected by inaccurate estimates.
The ore reserve figures presented in the Company’s public filings are estimates made by the Company’s technical personnel
and independent mining consultants with whom the Company contracts. Reserve estimates are a function of geological and
engineering analyses that require the Company to make assumptions about production costs, recoveries and silver and gold market
prices. Reserve estimation is an imprecise and subjective process. The accuracy of such estimates is a function of the quality of
available data and of engineering and geological interpretation, judgment and experience. Assumptions about silver and gold
market prices are subject to great uncertainty as those prices fluctuate widely and have fallen significantly at times over the past
several years. Declines in the market prices of silver or gold may render reserves containing relatively lower grades of ore
uneconomic to exploit, and the Company may be required to reduce reserve estimates, discontinue development or mining at one
or more of its properties or write down assets as impaired. Should the Company encounter mineralization or geologic formations
at any of its mines or projects different from those predicted, it may adjust its reserve estimates and alter its mining plans. Either
of these alternatives may adversely affect actual production and financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company’s estimates of future production, costs, and financial results are imprecise, depend upon subjective factors, may
not be realized in actual production and such estimates speak only as of their respective dates.
The Company has in the past, and may in the future, provide estimates and projections of its future production, costs and
financial results. Any such information is forward-looking. Such estimates are made by the Company’s management and technical
personnel and depend on numerous assumptions, including assumptions about the availability, accessibility, sufficiency and quality
of ore, the Company’s costs of production, the market prices of silver and gold, the Company’s ability to sustain and increase
production levels, the sufficiency of its infrastructure, the performance of its personnel and equipment, its ability to maintain and
obtain mining interests and permits, the state of government and community relations, and its compliance with existing and future
laws and regulations. Actual results and experience may differ materially from these assumptions. Any such production, cost, or
financial results estimates speak only as of the date on which they are made, and the Company disclaims any intent or obligation
to update such estimates, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
The Company’s future operating performance may not generate cash flows sufficient to meet debt payment obligations.
As of February 7, 2017, the Company had approximately $210.9 million of outstanding indebtedness. The Company’s
ability to make scheduled debt payments on outstanding indebtedness will depend on future results of operations and cash flows.
The Company’s results of operations and cash flows, in part, are subject to economic factors beyond its control, including the
market prices of silver and gold. The Company may not be able to generate enough cash flow to meet obligations and commitments
under outstanding debt instruments. If the Company cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service debt, it may
need to further refinance debt, dispose of assets or issue equity to obtain the necessary funds.
The Company cannot predict whether it would be able to refinance debt, issue equity or dispose of assets to raise funds
on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms. In a rising interest rate environment, the costs of borrowing additional funds or refinancing
outstanding indebtedness would also be expected to increase. If the Company raises additional funds by issuing equity securities
or securities convertible into equity securities, holders of its common stock could experience significant dilution of their ownership
interest, and these securities could have rights senior to those of the holders of common stock.
15
The terms of the Company’s debt impose restrictions on its operations.
The agreements governing the Company’s outstanding indebtedness include a number of significant negative covenants.
These covenants, among other things:
•
•
•
limit the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing, repurchase outstanding equity or issue debt securities;
require a portion of the Company’s cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes, thereby
reducing the amount of cash flows available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general
corporate purposes; and
place us at a disadvantage compared to other, less leveraged competitors.
A breach of any of these covenants could result in an event of default under the applicable agreement governing the Company’s
outstanding indebtedness that, if not cured or waived, could give the holders of the defaulted debt the right to terminate commitments
to lend and cause all amounts outstanding with respect to the debt to be due and payable immediately. Acceleration of any debt
could result in cross-defaults under the Company’s other debt instruments. The Company’s assets and cash flow may be insufficient
to repay borrowings fully under all of its outstanding debt instruments if any of its debt instruments are accelerated upon an event
of default, which could force the Company into bankruptcy or liquidation.
Any downgrade in the credit ratings assigned to the Company or its debt securities could increase future borrowing costs,
adversely affect the availability of new financing and may result in increased collateral requirements under the Company’s
existing surety bond portfolio.
There can be no assurance that any rating currently assigned by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services or Moody’s Investors
Service to the Company or its debt securities will remain unchanged for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered
if, in that rating agency’s judgment, future circumstances relating to the basis of the rating so warrant. If the Company is unable
to maintain its outstanding debt and financial ratios at levels acceptable to the credit rating agencies, or should the Company’s
business prospects or financial results deteriorate, including as a result of declines in silver and gold prices or other factors beyond
our control, our ratings could be downgraded by the rating agencies. A downgrade by the rating agencies could adversely affect
the value of the Company’s outstanding debt securities, its existing debt, and its ability to obtain new financing on favorable terms,
if at all, increase borrowing costs, and may result in increased collateral requirements under the Company’s existing surety bond
portfolio, which in turn may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial position.
The Company’s business is subject to U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws, a breach
or violation of which could lead to civil and criminal fines and penalties, loss of licenses or permits and reputational harm.
The Company operates in certain jurisdictions that have experienced governmental and private sector corruption to some
degree. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their
intermediaries from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or other commercial advantage.
Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could lead to civil and criminal fines and penalties, litigation, and loss
of operating licenses or permits, and may damage the Company’s reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s business, financial position and results of operations. The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and other
corporate policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws; however, there can be no assurance that the Company’s internal
control policies and procedures always will protect it from recklessness, fraudulent behavior, dishonesty or other inappropriate
acts committed by the Company’s affiliates, employees or agents. As such, the Company’s corporate policies and processes may
not prevent all potential breaches of law or other governance practices.
Continuation of the Company’s mining operations is dependent on the availability of sufficient and affordable water supplies.
The Company’s mining operations require significant quantities of water for mining, ore processing and related support
facilities. In particular, the Company’s properties in Mexico are in areas where water is scarce and competition among users for
continuing access to water is significant. Continuous production and mine development is dependent on the Company’s ability to
acquire and maintain water rights and claims and to defeat claims adverse to current water uses in legal proceedings. Although
each of the Company’s operating mines currently has sufficient water rights and claims to cover its operational demands, the
Company cannot predict the potential outcome of pending or future legal proceedings relating to water rights, claims and uses.
Water shortages may also result from weather or environmental and climate impacts out of the Company’s control, such as the
current drought conditions in Bolivia that have impacted operations at our San Bartolomé mine. Shortages in water supply could
result in production and processing interruptions. In addition, the scarcity of water in certain regions could result in increased costs
to obtain sufficient quantities of water to conduct the Company's operations. The loss of some or all water rights, in whole or in
part, or ongoing shortages of water to which we have rights or significantly higher costs to obtain sufficient quantities of water
16
(or the failure to procure sufficient quantities of water) could result in the Company’s inability to maintain production at current
or expected levels, require the Company to curtail or shut down mining production and could prevent the Company from pursuing
expansion or development opportunities, which could adversely affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
Laws and regulations may be introduced in some jurisdictions in which the Company operates which could also limit access to
sufficient water resources, thus adversely affecting the Company’s operations.
A significant delay or disruption in sales of concentrates as a result of the unexpected discontinuation of purchases by smelters
could have a material adverse effect on results of operations.
The Company currently sells its gold concentrates from the Kensington mine to a third-party smelter in China. The loss
of this smelter could have a material adverse effect on the Company if alternative smelters are unavailable. The Company cannot
ensure that alternative smelters would be available or offer comparable terms if the need for them were to arise or that it would
not experience delays or disruptions in sales that would materially and adversely affect results of operations.
There are significant hazards associated with mining activities, some of which may not be fully covered by insurance.
The mining business is subject to risks and hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, the encountering
of unusual or unexpected geological formations, cave-ins, flooding, earthquakes and periodic interruptions due to inclement or
hazardous weather conditions. These occurrences could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or production
facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, reduced production and delays in mining, asset write-downs, monetary
losses and possible legal liability.
Insurance fully covering many environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result
of disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and production, is not generally available. Any liabilities that the Company
incurs for these risks and hazards could be significant and could adversely affect results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition.
The Company is subject to significant governmental regulations, including the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act, and related
costs and delays may negatively affect its business.
Mining activities are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing environmental
protection, natural resources, prospecting, development, production, post-closure reclamation, taxes, labor standards and
occupational health and safety laws and regulations, including mine safety, toxic substances and other matters. The costs associated
with compliance with such laws and regulations are substantial. Possible future laws and regulations, or more restrictive
interpretations of current laws and regulations by governmental authorities, could cause additional expense, capital expenditures,
restrictions on or suspensions of operations and delays in the development of new properties.
U.S. surface and underground mines like the Kensington, Rochester and Wharf mines are continuously inspected by the
U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”), which inspections often lead to notices of violation. Recently, MSHA
has been conducting more frequent and more comprehensive inspections of mining operations in general.
Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions,
including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, which may require corrective
measures including capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions. In addition, any of the Company’s
U.S. mines could be subject to a temporary or extended shutdown as a result of a violation alleged by MSHA. Parties engaged in
mining operations or in the exploration or development of mineral properties may be required to compensate those suffering loss
or damage by reason of the mining activities and may be subject to civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of
applicable laws or regulations. Any such penalties, fines, sanctions or shutdowns could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s business and results of operations.
Compliance with environmental regulations and litigation based on environmental regulations could require significant
expenditures.
Environmental regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, land
development and land reclamation, and set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and
hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner that may require stricter standards and enforcement, increased
fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree
of responsibility for mining companies and their officers, directors and employees. The Company may incur environmental costs
that could have a material adverse effect on financial condition and results of operations. Any failure to remedy an environmental
17
problem could require it to suspend operations or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion of the required
remedy. The environmental standards that ultimately may be imposed at a mine site affect the cost of remediation and could exceed
the financial accruals that the Company has made for such remediation. The potential exposure may be significant and could have
a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Moreover, governmental authorities and private parties may bring lawsuits based upon damage to property and injury to
persons resulting from the environmental, health and safety impacts of prior and current operations, including operations conducted
by other mining companies many years ago at sites located on properties that the Company currently or formerly owned. These
lawsuits could lead to the imposition of substantial fines, remediation costs, penalties and other civil and criminal sanctions.
Substantial costs and liabilities, including for restoring the environment after the closure of mines, are inherent in the Company’s
operations. The Company cannot assure that any such law, regulation, enforcement or private claim would not have a material
adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Some of the mining wastes from the Company’s U.S. mines currently are exempt to a limited extent from the extensive
set of EPA regulations governing hazardous waste under the RCRA. If the EPA were to repeal this exemption, and designate these
mining wastes as hazardous under RCRA, the Company would be required to expend additional amounts on the handling of such
wastes and to make significant expenditures to construct hazardous waste storage or disposal facilities. In addition, if any of these
wastes causes contamination in or damage to the environment at a U.S. mining facility, that facility could be designated as a
“Superfund” site under CERCLA. Under CERCLA, any present owner or operator of a Superfund site or the owner or operator
at the time of contamination may be held jointly and severally liable regardless of fault, and may be forced to undertake extensive
remedial cleanup action or to pay for the cleanup efforts. The owner or operator also may be liable to federal, state and tribal
governmental entities for the cost of damages to natural resources, which could be substantial. Additional regulations or
requirements also are imposed on the Company’s tailings and waste disposal areas in Alaska under the federal Clean Water Act
(“CWA”), in Nevada under the Nevada Water Pollution Control Law which implements the CWA, and in South Dakota under the
South Dakota Water Pollution Control Act and the Administrative Rules of the State of South Dakota. In addition, proposed
CERCLA regulations requiring mining companies to obtain supplemental financial assurance could, if adopted, have a material
adverse effect on results of operations and cash flows.
Airborne emissions are subject to controls under air pollution statutes implementing the Clean Air Act in Nevada, Alaska
and South Dakota. In addition, there are numerous legislative and regulatory proposals related to climate change, including
legislation pending in the U.S. Congress to require reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Adoption of these proposals could
have a material adverse effect on results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, U.S. environmental conservation efforts could result in the withdrawal of certain federal lands from mineral
entry under the Mining Law, which could have the effect of restricting the Company’s current or future planned activities involving
its unpatented mining claims on the affected public lands.
The Company is required to obtain and renew governmental permits in order to conduct operations, a process which is often
costly and time-consuming. The Company’s ability to obtain necessary government permits to expand operations or begin new
operations can be materially affected by third party activists.
In the normal course of its business, the Company is required to obtain and renew governmental permits for exploration,
operations and expansion of existing operations and for the development of new projects. Obtaining and renewing governmental
permits is a complex and time-consuming process. The timeliness and success of permitting efforts are contingent upon many
variables not within the Company's control, including the interpretation of permit approval requirements administered by the
applicable permitting authority. The Company may not be able to obtain or renew permits that are necessary to its operations or
the cost and time required to obtain or renew permits may exceed the Company's expectations. Any unexpected delays or costs
associated with the permitting process could delay the development or impede the operation of a mine, which in turn could materially
adversely affect the Company's revenues and future growth. In addition, key permits and approvals may be revoked or suspended
or may be changed in a manner that adversely affects the Company’s operations.
Private parties such as environmental activists frequently attempt to intervene in the permitting process and to persuade
regulators to deny necessary permits or seek to overturn permits that have been issued. Obtaining the necessary governmental
permits is a complex and time-consuming process involving numerous jurisdictions and often involving public hearings and costly
undertakings. These third party actions can materially increase the costs and cause delays in the permitting process and could cause
the Company to not proceed with the development or expansion of a mine. In addition, the Company’s ability to successfully
obtain key permits and approvals to explore for, develop, operate and expand mines and to conduct its operations will likely depend
on the Company’s ability to develop, operate, expand and close mines in a manner that is consistent with the creation of social
and economic benefits in the surrounding communities, which may or may not be required by law. The Company’s ability to obtain
18
permits and approvals and to successfully operate in particular communities may be adversely impacted by real or perceived
detrimental events associated with its activities or those of other mining companies affecting the environment, human health and
safety of communities in which it operates.
In June 2013, Coeur submitted a proposed amendment to the plan of operations for the Rochester mine (“POA 10”) to
the BLM to expand leach pad capacity. The record of decision from the BLM for POA 10 was received three years later, in June
2016. If future permitting applications or amendments are not approved on a timely basis or at all, or if the permitting process is
delayed for any reason, including to address public comments, the Company’s plans for continued operations and future growth
could be materially adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results
of operations.
Significant investment risks and operational costs are associated with exploration and development activities. These risks and
costs may result in lower economic returns and may adversely affect the Company’s business.
The Company’s ability to sustain or increase its present production levels depends in part on successful exploration and
development of new ore bodies and expansion of existing mining operations. Substantial expenditures are required to establish
ore reserves, to extract metals from ores and, in the case of new properties, to construct mining and processing facilities.
Mineral exploration, particularly for silver and gold, involves many risks and is frequently unproductive. Even if mineral
deposits are found, those deposits may be insufficient in quantity and quality to return a profit from production, or it may take a
number of years until production is possible, during which time the economic viability of the project may change. Few properties
that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. The commercial viability of a mineral deposit, once developed,
depends on a number of factors, including: the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure;
government regulations including taxes, royalties and land tenure; land use; importing and exporting of minerals; environmental
protection; mineral prices; and issuance and maintenance of necessary permits. Factors that affect adequacy of infrastructure
include: reliability of roads, bridges, power sources and water supply; unusual or infrequent weather phenomena; sabotage; and
government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure. All of these factors are highly cyclical.
The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination may result in not receiving an adequate return
on invested capital.
In addition, exploration projects, such as the Company’s La Preciosa project, may have no operating history upon which
to base estimates of future operating costs and capital requirements. Exploration project items such as estimates of reserves, metal
recoveries and cash operating costs are to a large extent based upon the interpretation of geologic data, obtained from a limited
number of drill holes and other sampling techniques, and feasibility studies. Estimates of cash operating costs are then derived
based upon anticipated tonnage and grades of ore to be mined and processed, the configuration of the ore body, expected recovery
rates of metals from the ore, comparable facility and equipment costs, anticipated climate conditions and other factors. As a result,
actual operating costs and economic returns of any and all exploration projects may materially differ from the costs and returns
estimated, and accordingly, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be negatively affected.
The significant and sustained decline in gold and silver prices from 2013 to early 2016 caused the Company to write down
certain of its long-lived assets and, in the future, such declines could cause one or more of the Company’s mining properties
to become less profitable, which could require the Company to record additional write-downs of long-lived assets. Such write-
downs may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for recoverability pursuant to the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s
Accounting Standards Codification Section 360. Under that standard, the Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived
assets, such as its mining properties, upon a triggering event. Such review involves the Company estimating the future undiscounted
cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Impairment, measured by comparing an asset’s
carrying value to its fair value, must be recognized when the carrying value of the asset exceeds these cash flows. The Company
conducts a review of the financial performance of its mines in connection with the preparation of its financial statements for each
reported period and determines whether any triggering events are indicated.
The Company’s assessment of the recoverability of its long-lived assets in 2016 indicated that a write-down of $4.4
million was required. These non-cash impairment charges resulted in write-downs in the Company's Statement of Comprehensive
Income (Loss) and reduced the carrying value of Mining properties and Property, plant, and equipment on the Company’s balance
sheet at December 31, 2016. See Note 4 -- Write-Downs in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.
If there are further significant and sustained declines in silver and gold prices or if the currently low silver or gold prices
remain at such prices, or if the Company fails to control production and operating costs or realize the mineable ore reserves at its
19
mining properties, the Company may terminate or suspend mining operations at one or more of its properties. These events could
require a further write-down of the carrying value of the Company’s assets. Any such actions would adversely affect the Company’s
results of operations and financial condition.
The Company may record other types of charges in the future if it sells a property for a price less than its carrying value
or has to increase reclamation liabilities in connection with the closure and reclamation of a property. Any additional write-downs
of mining properties could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
The Company’s use of derivative contracts to protect against market price volatility exposes it to risk of opportunity loss, mark-
to-market fair value adjustments and exposure to counterparty credit risk.
From time to time, the Company may enter into price risk management contracts to protect against fluctuations in the
price of silver and gold, foreign currency rates and changes in the prices of fuel and other input costs. These contracts could include
forward sales or purchase contracts, futures contracts, purchased or sold put and call options and other derivative instruments.
The use of derivative instruments can expose the Company to risk of an opportunity loss and may also result in significant
mark-to-market fair value adjustments, which may have a material adverse impact on reported financial results. The Company is
exposed to credit risk with contract counterparties, including, but not limited to, sales contracts and derivative contracts. In the
event of nonperformance in connection with a contract, the Company could be exposed to a loss of value for that contract.
Forward sales, royalty arrangements, and certain derivative instruments can result in limiting the Company’s ability to take
advantage of increased metal prices while increasing its exposure to lower metal prices.
The Company has in the past entered into, and may in the future enter into, arrangements under which it has agreed to
make royalty or similar payments to lenders or other third parties in amounts that are based on expected production and price
levels for silver or gold. The Company enters into such arrangements when it concludes that they provide it with necessary capital
to develop a specific mining property or to achieve other business objectives. Royalty or similar payment obligations, however,
can limit the Company’s ability to realize the full effects of rising gold or silver prices and may require the Company to make
potentially significant cash payments if the mine fails to achieve specified minimum production levels.
The Company is dependent upon information technology systems, which are subject to disruption, damage, failure and risks
associated with implementation and integration.
The Company’s information technology systems used in its operations are subject to disruption, damage or failure from
a variety of sources, including, without limitation, computer viruses, security breaches, cyber-attacks, natural disasters and defects
in design. Cybersecurity incidents, in particular, are evolving and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to
gain unauthorized access to data and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in systems, unauthorized
release of confidential or otherwise protected information and the corruption of data. Various measures have been implemented
to manage the Company’s risks related to information technology systems and network disruptions. However, given the
unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of information technology disruptions, the Company could potentially be subject
to production downtimes, operational delays, the compromising of confidential or otherwise protected information, destruction or
corruption of data, security breaches, other manipulation or improper use of our systems and networks or financial losses from
remedial actions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on cash flows, financial condition or results of operations.
The Company could also be adversely affected by system or network disruptions if new or upgraded information
technology systems are defective, not installed properly or not properly integrated into operations. Various measures have been
implemented to manage the risks related to the system implementation and modification, but system modification failures could
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and results of operations.
The Company’s business depends on good relations with, and the retention and hiring of, employees.
The Company may experience labor disputes, work stoppages or other disruptions in production that could adversely
affect its business and results of operations. Labor disruptions may be used to advocate labor, political or social goals, particularly
at non-U.S. mines. For example, labor disruptions may occur in sympathy with strikes or labor unrest in other sectors of local
economies. During the past several years, two of the Company’s mines have experienced work stoppages, each of which was
resolved within a short period of time and had no material effect on results of operations or financial condition. The Company
cannot assure that work stoppages or other disruptions will not occur in the future. Any such work stoppage or disruption could
expose the Company to significant costs and have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations or financial
condition.
20
At December 31, 2016, unions represented approximately 11% of the Company’s global workforce, all of which were
comprised of workers at the San Bartolomé mine in Bolivia. The Company has a labor agreement at the San Bartolomé mine which
is in effect for 2017. The Company cannot predict whether this agreement will be renewed on similar terms or at all, whether future
labor disruptions will occur or, if disruptions do occur, how long they will last.
We compete with other mining companies to attract and retain key executives, skilled labor, contractors and other
employees. We may be unable to continue to attract and retain skilled and experienced employees, which could have an adverse
effect on our competitive position or adversely impact our results of operations or financial condition.
Disputes regarding the Company’s mining claims, concessions or surface rights to land in the vicinity of the Company’s mining
projects could adversely impact operations.
The validity of mining or exploration claims, concessions or rights, which constitute most of the Company’s property
holdings, is often uncertain and may be contested. The Company has used commercially reasonable efforts, in accordance with
industry standard, to investigate its title or claims to its various properties, however, no assurance can be given that applicable
governments will not revoke or significantly alter the conditions of the applicable exploration and mining claims, concessions or
rights or that such exploration and mining claims, concessions or rights will not be challenged by third parties. Although the
Company has attempted to acquire satisfactory title to undeveloped properties, in accordance with mining industry practice it does
not generally obtain title opinions until a decision is made to develop a property. As a result, some titles, particularly titles to
undeveloped properties may be defective. Defective title to any of the Company’s exploration and mining claims, concessions or
rights could result in litigation, insurance claims and potential losses affecting its business as a whole. There may be challenges
to the title of any of the claims comprising the Company’s projects that, if successful, could impair development and operations.
A defect could result in the Company losing all or a portion of its right, title, estate and interest in and to the properties to which
the title defect relates.
In Mexico, while mineral rights are administered by the federal government through federally issued mining concessions,
ejidos control surface or surface access rights to the land. An ejido may sell or lease lands directly to a private entity. While the
Company has agreements or is in the process of negotiating agreements with the ejidos that impact all of its projects in Mexico,
some of these agreements may be subject to renegotiation. In Bolivia, in the past we have obtained surface rights from cooperatives,
through a series of “joint venture” contracts. Changes to or termination of the existing agreements or leases or failure to reach
agreement in any future negotiations with the cooperatives or the Bolivian government may have a significant impact on operations
at the Company’s projects and may, on occasion, lead to litigation. Further, the Bolivian government under Law No. 403 may have
the ability to reverse our wholly-owned mining rights. Any such reversion decision could adversely impact our future mining
plans.
The Company relies on third parties who own, maintain and operate the mines underlying its streaming and royalty assets.
The Endeavor mine is owned, maintained and operated by Cobar, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBH. However, pursuant
to a silver sale and purchase agreement, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, CDE Australia Pty. Ltd. (“CDE Australia”), has
acquired all silver production and reserves at the Endeavor mine, up to a total of 20.0 million payable ounces. CDE Australia has
agreed to pay Cobar an operating cost contribution of $1.00 for each ounce of payable silver, indexed annually for inflation, plus
a further increment when the silver price exceeds $7.00 per ounce. In addition, the Company currently holds a 1.5% NSR on
Dynasty Metals & Mining, Inc.’s Zaruma mine in Ecuador as well as several royalties on mining assets that are not yet developed.
The Company may acquire additional streaming and royalty interests in the future.
The Company relies on third parties to own, maintain and operate the mining projects underlying its royalty and streaming
interests, which exposes it to substantial counterparty risk. These third parties may fail to adequately or appropriately operate or
maintain their respective projects or may be unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations under their agreements with the Company.
The Company cannot ensure that each of these third parties will not suffer financial hardship, will continue as a going
concern or will not enter bankruptcy or otherwise liquidate. Any such event could expose the Company to significant costs and
could limit the amounts, if any, the Company could recover in any proceeding against any such third party for breach of their
agreement with the Company. There can be no assurance that the production from any of these mining operations will meet
forecasted production targets. At any time, any of the owners or operators of these mining operations may decide to suspend or
discontinue operations. In addition, the owners or operators of projects that are not yet operational in which the Company may
hold royalty or streaming interests may decide to delay or not to proceed with commencing commercial production. Any failure,
21
inability or refusal of a counterparty to meet its obligations to the Company under these royalty or streaming arrangements could
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.
The Company is subject to litigation and may be subject to additional litigation in the future.
The Company is currently, and may in the future become, subject to other litigation, arbitration or proceedings with other
parties. If decided adversely to the Company, these legal proceedings, or others that could be brought against the Company in the
future, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or prospects. For a more detailed discussion of pending
litigation, see Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In the event of a dispute arising at the Company’s foreign operations,
the Company may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or arbitral panels, or may not be successful in subjecting
foreign persons to the jurisdiction of courts or arbitral panels in the United States. The Company’s inability to enforce its rights
and the enforcement of rights on a prejudicial basis by foreign courts or arbitral panels could have an adverse effect on the Company’s
results of operations and financial position.
The Company has the ability to issue additional equity securities, including in connection with an acquisition of other companies,
which would lead to dilution of its issued and outstanding common stock and may materially and adversely affect the price of
its common stock.
The issuance of additional equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, whether to acquire new
companies or businesses or for other strategic benefits, would result in dilution of the Company's existing stockholders' equity
ownership. The Company is authorized to issue, without stockholder approval, 10.0 million shares of preferred stock in one or
more series, to establish the number of shares to be included in each series and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and
relative participating, optional, conversion and other special rights of the shares of each series as well as the qualification, limitations
or restrictions on each series. Any series of preferred stock could contain dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms
of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences or other rights superior to the rights of holders of its common stock. If
the Company issues additional equity securities, the price of its common stock may be materially and adversely affected.
Holders of our common stock may not receive dividends.
We have not historically declared cash dividends on our common stock. Holders of our common stock are entitled to
receive only such dividends as our Board of Directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. We are
incorporated in Delaware and governed by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Delaware law allows a corporation to pay
dividends only out of surplus, as determined under Delaware law or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the fiscal year in
which the dividend was declared and for the preceding fiscal year. Under Delaware law, however, we cannot pay dividends out of
net profits if, after we pay the dividend, our capital would be less than the capital represented by the outstanding stock of all classes
having a preference upon the distribution of assets. Our ability to pay dividends will be subject to our future earnings, capital
requirements and financial condition, as well as our compliance with covenants related to existing or future indebtedness and
would only be declared in the discretion of our Board of Directors.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
22
Item 2.
Properties
SILVER AND GOLD MINING PROPERTIES
Coeur Mining's significant production and development properties are described below. Operating statistics are presented
in the section entitled "Operating Statistics" below.
Mexico — Palmarejo
The Palmarejo complex consists of (1) the Palmarejo mine and mill; (2) the Guadalupe underground mine, located about
8 kilometers southeast of the Palmarejo mine; (3) the Independencia underground mine, located approximately 800 meters northeast
of the Guadalupe underground mine; and (4) other nearby deposits and exploration targets. The Palmarejo complex is located in
the state of Chihuahua, Mexico. Access to the property is provided by air, rail, and all-weather paved and gravel roads from the
state capitol of Chihuahua. Silver and gold production from the Palmarejo complex was approximately 4.4 million ounces and
73,913 ounces in 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2016, we reported 40.8 million ounces of silver reserves and 592,000 ounces
of gold reserves at the Palmarejo complex.
In April 2015, Coeur completed its acquisition of Paramount Gold and Silver Corp. (“Paramount”) in an all-stock
transaction valued at approximately $146.0 million. Following completion of the transaction, Paramount, together with its wholly-
owned subsidiary, Paramount Gold de Mexico ("Paramount Mexico"), became wholly-owned subsidiaries of Coeur. In September
2016, Paramount Mexico was merged into Coeur Mexicana. Upon completion of this merger, Coeur Mexicana became the legal
owner of all mining concessions that comprise the Palmarejo complex.
23
The Palmarejo complex consists of 79 wholly-owned mining concessions, covering approximately 112,520 acres
(45,535.18 hectares) of land. In total, the Palmarejo complex covers over 175 square miles. All mining concessions owned by
Coeur Mexicana are valid until at least 2029.
The Palmarejo complex is located on the western flank of the Sierra Madre Occidental, a mountain range that comprises
the central spine of northern Mexico. The north-northwest trending Sierra Madre Occidental is composed of a relatively flat-lying
sequence of Tertiary volcanic rocks that forms a volcanic plateau, cut by numerous igneous intrusive rocks. This volcanic plateau
is deeply incised in the Palmarejo mine area, forming steep-walled canyons. The Sierra Madre Occidental gives way to the west
to an extensional terrain that represents the southward continuation of the Basin and Range Province of the western United States,
and then to the coastal plain of western Mexico.
The gold and silver deposits at the Palmarejo complex, typical of many of the other silver and gold deposits in the Sierra
Madre, are classified as epithermal deposits and are hosted in multiple veins, breccias, and fractures. These geologic structures
trend generally northwest to southeast and dip either southwest or northeast. The dip on the structures ranges from about 45 degrees
to 70 degrees. In the mineralized portions of the structures, gold and silver are zoned from top to bottom with higher silver values
occurring in the upper parts of the deposit and higher gold values in the lower parts, sometimes accompanied by base metal
mineralization, though local variations are common. The Palmarejo complex contains a number of mineralized zones or areas of
interest. The most important of these to date is the Palmarejo zone in the north of the mining concessions, which covers the old
Palmarejo gold-silver mine formed at the intersection of the northwest-southeast trending La Prieta and La Blanca gold-and-silver
bearing structures. In addition to the Palmarejo zone, other mineralized vein and alteration systems in the district area have been
identified all roughly sub-parallel to the Palmarejo zone. The most significant of these additional targets are the Guadalupe (including
Animas), Independencia, and La Patria vein systems in the southern part of the property, which are currently under development
(Guadalupe and Independencia) and exploration (La Patria) by the Company.
In 2009, Coeur Mexicana entered into a gold production royalty transaction with a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada
Corporation under which Franco-Nevada purchased a royalty covering 50% of the life of mine gold to be produced by Coeur from
the Palmarejo mine. In 2014, Coeur Mexicana terminated the Palmarejo gold production royalty effective upon completion of the
minimum ounce delivery requirement. Subsequently, Coeur Mexicana entered into a gold stream agreement with a subsidiary of
Franco-Nevada Corporation whereby Coeur Mexicana will sell 50% of Coeur Mexicana Property gold production upon completion
of the gold production royalty minimum ounce delivery requirement for the lesser of $800 or spot price per ounce. The gold
production royalty was terminated in July 2016 upon delivery of the minimum ounce requirement and the new gold stream
agreement is now in effect. The properties acquired by Coeur in the Paramount transaction are not subject to the gold stream
agreement.
USA — Rochester
The Rochester mine, and associated heap leach facilities, is an open pit silver and gold mine located in Pershing County,
Nevada, approximately 13 miles northeast of the city of Lovelock. The Company owns 100% of the Rochester Mine through
Coeur Rochester. The mine consists of the main Rochester deposit and the adjacent Nevada Packard deposit, southwest of the
Rochester mine. The Rochester mine is fully supported with electricity, supplied by a local power company on their public grid,
telephone and radio communications, production water wells, and processing, maintenance, warehouse, and office facilities. Ore
is mined using conventional open pit methods, with gold and silver recovered by heap leaching of crushed open-pit ore placed on
pads located within the Rochester mining area. Based upon actual operating experience and metallurgical testing, the Company
estimates ultimate recovery rates from the crushed ore of 61.0% for silver, depending on the ore being leached, and 92.0% for
gold. Silver and gold production from Rochester was approximately 4.6 million ounces and 50,751 ounces in 2016, respectively.
At December 31, 2016, we reported 112.0 million ounces of silver reserves and 803,000 ounces of gold reserves at the Rochester
mine.
Coeur Rochester lands consist of approximately 16,354 net acres, which encompasses 734 Federal unpatented lode claims,
appropriating approximately 11,075 net acres of Public Land, 21 patented lode claims, consisting of approximately 357 acres,
interests owned in approximately 4,634 gross acres of additional real property and certain rights in and to approximately 269 acres,
held either through lease, letter agreement or license.
The Company acquired the Rochester property from ASARCO in 1983 and commenced mining in 1986. No mining or
processing was conducted at Rochester by the prior owner. The Company acquired its initial interest in the adjacent Nevada Packard
property in 1996, completed the full purchase in 1999 and commenced mining in 2003. However, mining of the Nevada Packard
property has since ceased. The prior owner conducted very limited mining and processing at Nevada Packard. Collectively, the
Rochester and Nevada Packard properties, together with other adjacent and contiguous lands subsequently acquired, comprise the
Rochester silver and gold processing operation. The Federal unpatented lode claims are maintained via annual filings and timely
payment of claim maintenance fees to the BLM, which acts as administrator of the claims.
24 At Rochester, silver and gold mineralization is hosted in folded and faulted volcanic rocks of the Rochester Formation
and overlying Weaver Formation. Silver and gold, consisting of silver sulfosalt minerals, argentite, silver-bearing tetrahedrite and
minor native gold, are contained in zones of multiple quartz veins and veinlets (vein, vein swarms and stockworks) with variable
amounts of pyrite.
The Company is obligated to pay a NSR royalty to ASARCO, the prior owner, when the average quarterly market price
of silver equals or exceeds $23.60 per ounce indexed for inflation up to a maximum rate of 5% with the condition that the Rochester
mine achieves positive cash flow for the applicable year. If cash flow is negative in any calendar year, the maximum royalty payable
is $250,000.
Coeur Rochester is obligated to pay a 3.4% NSR royalty on up to 39.4 million silver equivalent ounces produced and
sold from a portion of the Rochester mine (including stockpile ore, mineral processing facilities and mining claims located in the
Sections set forth in the NSR royalty agreement) commencing January 1, 2014. For each calendar quarter, the royalty is payable
on the actual sales prices received at the time of sale (exclusive of gains or losses associated with trading activities), less refining
costs, of gold and silver produced and sold from the Rochester mine. At December 31, 2016, 18.0 million silver equivalent ounces
remain subject to the 3.4% NSR royalty.
USA — Kensington
The Kensington underground gold mine and associated milling facilities are located on the east side of the Lynn Canal
about 45 miles north-northwest of Juneau, Alaska. The Company controls 100% of the mine through Coeur Alaska. The mine is
accessed by a horizontal tunnel and utilizes conventional and mechanized underground mining methods. Ore is processed in a
flotation mill that produces a concentrate that is sold to third party smelters. Waste material is deposited in an impoundment facility
on the property. Power is supplied by on-site diesel generators. Access to the mine is by either a combination of road vehicles,
boat, helicopter, floatplane, or by boat direct from Juneau. Gold production from the Kensington mine was 124,331 ounces in
2016. At December 31, 2016, we reported 497,000 ounces of gold reserves at the Kensington mine.
Coeur Alaska controls two contiguous property groups: the Kensington Group and Jualin Group. The Kensington Group,
totaling approximately 3,969 net acres, consists of 51 patented lode and patented mill site claims comprising approximately 766
net acres, 284 Federal unpatented lode claims covering approximately 3,108 net acres, and 13 State of Alaska mining claims
covering approximately 95 net acres. The Jualin Group, totaling approximately 8,366 net acres, is comprised of 23 patented lode
and patented mill site claims covering approximately 388 net acres, 471 Federal unpatented lode claims and 1 Federal unpatented
mill site claim appropriating approximately 7,916 net acres, a State of Alaska upland mining lease comprising approximately 682
acres, one State of Alaska mining claim comprising approximately three acres and four State-selected mining claims covering
approximately 70 acres. 14 of the 23 patented lode claims cover private surface estate only. The mineral estate to these 14 patented
lode claims is owned by the State of Alaska, the mineral rights to which are secured by a State of Alaska upland mining lease. The
Company controls properties comprising the Jualin Group, under a lease agreement with Hyak Mining Company, which is valid
until August 5, 2035 and thereafter, provided mining and production are actively occurring within and from the leased premises.
The Federal unpatented lode and Federal unpatented mill site claims are maintained via annual filings and timely payment
of claim maintenance fees to the BLM, which acts as administrator of the claims. State of Alaska mining claims and upland mining
leases are maintained via fees and filings to the Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land and Water
and the Juneau Recorder’s Office. Real property taxes are paid annually to the City and Borough of Juneau for the patented lode
claims. Private lease payments are paid annually and all leases are in good standing.
The Kensington ore deposit consists of multiple gold bearing mesothermal, quartz, carbonate and pyrite vein swarms and
discrete quartz-pyrite veins hosted in Cretaceous-aged Jualin diorite. Most of the gold is contained in calaverite (AuTe2) that occurs
in association with native gold as inclusions in and interstitial to pyrite grains and in microfractures in pyrite.
USA — Wharf
The Wharf mine is located in the northern Black Hills of western South Dakota, approximately four miles south and west
of the city of Lead, South Dakota. Access is established by paved road with power supplied by a local power company.
In February 2015, Coeur completed its acquisition of the Wharf mine. As a result of the acquisition, Coeur owns all of
the issued and outstanding equity interests in Wharf and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Golden Reward Mining Limited Partnership
(“Golden Reward”). Gold production from the Wharf mine was 109,175 ounces in 2016. At December 31, 2016, we reported
639,000 ounces of gold reserves at Wharf.
There are two contiguous property groups located at the Wharf mine; the Wharf Group and the Golden Reward Group,
owned or controlled by wholly-owned subsidiaries of Coeur and Wharf Resources. The Wharf Group is generally described as
25
the northern and western portions of the project, while the Golden Reward Group is generally described as the southern and eastern
portion of the project.
The Wharf Group comprises 362 patented lode claims, 35 government lots, 123 subdivided lots, and 59 federal unpatented
lode claims. The Wharf Group is comprised of approximately 3,638 net acres of surface, 652 net mineral acres where both the
Precambrian and younger formations are owned or controlled, 3,243 net mineral acres of non-Precambrian mineral estate, and
1,603 net mineral acres of Precambrian mineral estate and 287 net acres of federal unpatented lode claims. The Golden Reward
Group encompasses 218 patented lode claims, 14 government lots, 19 subdivided lots and 33 federal unpatented lode claims. The
Golden Reward Group is comprised of approximately 1,563 net acres of surface estate, 2,987 net mineral acres of mineral estate
where both the Precambrian and younger formations are owned or controlled, 357 net mineral acres of Non-Precambrian mineral
estate, 153 net mineral acres of Precambrian mineral estate and 25 net acres of federal unpatented lode claims.
The federal unpatented lode claims are maintained by the timely annual payment of claim maintenance fees, payable to
the BLM. The patented lands are private land and therefore not subject to federal claim maintenance requirements. However, as
private land, they are subject to ad valorem property taxes assessed by Lawrence County, South Dakota, which may be paid semi-
annually.
Wharf and Golden Reward are obligated to pay a sliding scale production royalty to Royal Gold, Inc. The royalty encumbers
the majority of the land comprising the Wharf Group, together with a small portion of the lands encompassing the Golden Reward
Group, and wholly excludes the Precambrian Mineral Estate. The sliding scale provides for a 2.0% royalty on the gross value less
state severance taxes with a monthly average PM LBMA Gold Price of $500 or more per ounce.
Wharf and Golden Reward are also obligated to pay a 3.0% non-participating royalty to Donald D. Valentine, et al, on gold
that is produced from ores mined and delivered to heap leach pads or recovered from tailings. This royalty encumbers the mineral
estate, including the Precambrian Mineral Estate, of much of the lands comprising the Wharf Group, together with a small portion
of the lands encompassing the Golden Reward Group. Wharf holds a right of first refusal to purchase this royalty upon any proposed
transfer by the royalty holder.
Bolivia — San Bartolomé
The San Bartolomé silver mine, and associated milling operation, operated by Manquiri, is located on the flanks of the
Cerro Rico mountain bordering the town of Potosí, in the department of Potosí, Bolivia. Access to the property and Manquiri’s
processing facilities is by paved and all-weather gravel roads leading south-southwest from Potosí. Silver was first discovered in
the area around 1545. Mining of silver and lesser amounts of tin and base metals has been conducted nearly continuously since
that time from multiple underground mines driven into Cerro Rico. Silver production from the San Bartolomé mine was
approximately 5.5 million ounces in 2016. At December 31, 2016, we reported 21.1 million ounces of silver reserves at the San
Bartolomé mine.
The silver mineralization at the San Bartolomé mine is hosted in unconsolidated sediments (pallacos), reworked sediments
(sucus and troceras), and oxide stockpiles and dumps (desmontes) from past mining that occurred on Cerro Rico. Cerro Rico is a
prominent mountain in the region that reaches an elevation of over 15,400 feet (over 4,700 meters). It is composed of Tertiary-
aged volcanic and intrusive rocks that were emplaced into and over older sedimentary, and volcanic, basement rocks. Silver, along
with tin and base metals, is located in multiple veins and vein swarms and stockworks that occur in a northeast trending belt, which
transects Cerro Rico. The upper parts of the Cerro Rico mineralized system were subsequently eroded and re-deposited into the
flanking gravel deposits. Silver is hosted in all portions of the pallacos, sucus, and troceras with the best grades segregated to the
coarser-grained silicified fragments. These deposits lend themselves to simple, free digging surface mining techniques and can be
extracted without drilling and blasting. Of the several pallaco deposits that are controlled by Manquiri and surround Cerro Rico,
three are of primary importance and are known as Huacajchi, Diablo, and Santa Rita.
The mineral and mining rights for the San Bartolomé mine are held through a mixture of JV Agreements, long-term lease
agreements, and Autorizaciones Transitorias Especiales (similar to mining concessions) with seven independent mining
cooperatives and the Bolivian state-owned mining organization COMIBOL. See “Item 1. Business - Government Regulation,
Maintenance of Claims, Bolivia” for additional information. Manquiri controls three acres (one hectare) of land at San Bartolomé,
around Cerro Rico, through these agreements and Autorizaciones Transitorias Especiales and approximately 8,587 acres (3,475
hectares) of Autorizaciones Transitorias Especiales at the Rio Blanco property, a gold exploration target south of Potosí that is in
the process of being abandoned by Manquiri. The San Bartolomé agreements expire between 2021 and 2028 and are generally
subject to a production royalty payable partially to the cooperatives and partially to COMIBOL. The royalty rate is 3% at silver
prices below $4 per ounce and 6% at prices above $8 per ounce. Manquiri has additional mining rights, known as the Plahipo
project, which include the mining rights to oxide dumps adjacent to the original property package. The oxide dumps included in
the Plahipo project are subject to a sliding scale royalty payable to COMIBOL that is a function of silver price. Manquiri incurred
royalty payment obligations to COMIBOL and the Cooperatives for these mining rights totaling $2.8 million and $2.6 million for
the years ended 2016 and 2015, respectively.
26
In response to conflicts between local mining cooperatives and the Bolivian government, on September 1, 2016, the
Bolivian government issued Supreme Decree No. 2891, which imposes tighter restrictions on mining cooperatives, including
reversion of mining areas leased to the mining cooperatives by COMIBOL that are subject to joint venture agreements, leases or
subleases with third parties to the Bolivian state. Although Bolivian government officials have made public statements that the
decree will not impact Manquiri’s ability to continue operations in the areas subject to the JV Agreements and the JV Agreements
continue to be formally in existence, any cancellation of leases between COMIBOL and the applicable mining cooperatives and/
or the JV Agreements will require negotiation of and entry into contracts directly with COMIBOL to continue mining operations
at the affected areas. In January 2017, an interim permit was granted to Manquiri allowing for continuation of mining operations
in the areas subject to the JV Agreements pending negotiation of contracts directly with COMIBOL.
STREAMING AND ROYALTY INTERESTS
Australia — Endeavor
The Endeavor mine and associated mill facility is an underground silver and base metal operation in production since
1983 located in north-central New South Wales, Australia, about 30 miles (48 kilometers) northwest of the community of Cobar,
accessible by paved road. The ore reserves at Endeavor are covered by five consolidated mining leases issued by the state of New
South Wales to Cobar Operations Pty. Limited (“Cobar”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBH Resources Ltd., which in turn is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Toho Zinc Co. Ltd. The leases form a contiguous block of 10,121 acres in size and expire between
2019 and 2027. The mine employs bulk mining methods and utilizes a conventional flotation mill to produce a concentrate that
is sold to a third-party smelter. Power to the mine and processing facilities is provided by the grid servicing the local communities.
Silver production from Endeavor was approximately 0.2 million ounces in 2016. At July 1, 2016, we reported 2.6 million ounces
of silver reserves at Endeavor.
In May 2005, CDE Australia Pty. Ltd. (“CDE Australia”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Coeur Capital, acquired silver
production and reserves contained at the Endeavor Mine, for $44.0 million. Under the terms of the agreement, as modified in 2006,
CDE Australia owns all silver production and reserves up to a total of 20.0 million ounces. CDE Australia has committed to pay
Cobar an operating cost contribution of $1.00 for each ounce of silver (indexed annually and currently $1.32 an ounce) plus a
further increment when the silver price exceeds $7.00 per ounce.
At Endeavor, silver, lead, zinc and lesser amounts of copper mineralization are contained within sulfide lenses hosted in
fine-grained sedimentary rocks of the Paleozoic-aged Amphitheatre Group. Sulfide lenses are elliptically-shaped, steeply-dipping
to the southwest and strike to the northwest. Principal ore minerals are galena, sphalerite and chalcopyrite. Silver occurs with both
lead- and zinc-rich sulfide zones.
Other Royalties
The Company owns several other royalties on pre-commercial production and exploration-stage properties.
NEAR-MINE EXPLORATION
Exploration expense was $12.9 million, $11.6 million, and $21.7 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Capitalized
drilling was $12.9 million in 2016 and $6.0 million in 2015. Coeur's exploration program completed over 400,896 feet (122,195
meters) of combined core and reverse circulation drilling in 2016.
Mexico - Palmarejo
Exploration focused primarily on the expansion of the Guadalupe and Independencia underground mines, and discovery
of the Los Bancos and Nación-Dana vein deposits. Exploration expense of $4.7 million related to mapping, sampling, drill target
generation, and drilling new silver and gold mineralization (72,276 feet or 22,030 meters). Capitalized drilling of $6.0 million
related to infill resource conversion drilling in the Guadalupe and Independencia ore bodies (98,499 feet or 30,023 meters).
The Company expects $6.9 million of exploration expense in 2017 to discover and expand silver and gold mineralization
in the Guadalupe-Independencia corridor, mainly focused on expansion of northern portions of Independencia, Nación-Dana, La
Bavisa, and new vein targets just west-northwest of Guadalupe Mine. Additionally, the Company is planning to spend $5.3 million
of conversion drilling in the Guadalupe and Independencia ore bodies.
27
USA - Kensington
Exploration expense of $3.5 million consisted of drilling 36,860 feet (11,235 meters) while $2.7 million of conversion
drilling completed 55,042 feet (16,777 meters) to expand and define mineralization in the main Kensington deposit. Exploration
focused on testing new veins in the district as well as expansion of the high-grade Jualin resource, which became the focus of a
revised preliminary economic assessment in April 2015. Capitalized drilling was directed at infill drilling in the southern and
deeper portions of the main Kensington resource as well as the Raven vein. In 2017, the Company expects $4.1 million in
exploration expense and $2.9 million of conversion drilling for additional expansion at Jualin and South Kensington.
USA - Wharf
Conversion drilling of $1.0 million completed 30,530 feet (9,306 meters) of drilling primarily within the Portland Main
resource. In 2017, the Company expects exploration expense of $0.2 million and $1.0 million of conversion drilling focused in
the Portland Main and Portland Ridge layback areas.
USA - Rochester
Exploration expense was $0.8 million and capitalized drilling was $2.7 million. Exploration expense consisted of 16,220
feet (4,944 meters) testing areas east of the southeast of Packard Pit and the new East Rochester resource while conversion drilling
consisted of 77,415 feet (23,596 meters) mainly within the main Rochester Pit resource. In 2017, the Company expects $1.2 million
of exploration expense to drill testing several targets around Rochester and $1.5 million in conversion drilling to continue to infill
and grow the South Rochester, North Rochester and East Rochester resources.
Bolivia - San Bartolomé
In 2016, the Company spent $0.5 million in 2016 for geophysics work, trenching and sampling to refine the reserve
model. In 2017, the Company expects to spend $0.3 million for continued work on the reserve model.
EARLY-STAGE EXPLORATION PROPERTIES
The Company spent $2.9 million completing target analysis and regional exploration with a focus on projects in Nevada,
USA and Chihuahua, Mexico. A total of 8,821 feet (2,689 meters) of drilling was completed on two projects in Nevada, Quito
and Klondyke projects; and, a total of 3,255 feet (992 meters) were drilled in Mexico at Todos Los Santos Project. The Company
entered an exploration and option agreements for the Mineral Hill project in Wyoming as well as two new lease/option agreements
near Tonopah, Nevada. The Company expects to spend $5.3 million in 2017 focused on surface sampling and mapping of all the
projects in preparation for an expanded drilling program in 2018.
ADVANCED-STAGE EXPLORATION PROPERTIES
Mexico - La Preciosa Project
The La Preciosa project is located approximately 52 miles (84 kilometers) northeast of the city of Durango in Durango
State, Mexico. The veins at the La Preciosa project have been classified as low- to intermediate-sulfidation type. Two major vein
and vein breccia systems are exposed on hills and ridges on either side of an approximately 800 meter wide valley, including the
Martha, Abundancia, Gloria, Pica, Luz Elena, Sur, and Nueva veins.
In 2016, the Company produced a new geologic model and subsequently completed 1,978 feet (603 meters) of conversion
drilling. Drilling began again in January, and the Company expects to complete $3.8 million of exploration, primarily for conversion
drilling in 2017.
28
Argentina - Joaquin Project
The Joaquin silver-gold exploration project is located in the Santa Cruz province of southern Argentina, The property is
accessed by all-weather dirt roads, leading north-northeast from the town of Gobernador Gregores. The Joaquin property
encompasses over 55,502 acres (22,461 hectares) of cateos and MDs. The geology of the Joaquin property consists dominantly
of various volcanic rocks of the Jurassic-aged Chon Aike Formation, the host to most of the precious metal deposits discovered
to date in the Santa Cruz province, with lesser amounts of intrusive rocks associated with the Chon Aike Formation. Collectively,
the volcanic and intrusive rock units form a prominent geologic domain in the province termed the Deseado Massif. Silver and
gold mineralization at Joaquin occurs in epithermal veins, breccia, stockwork veinlets and mantos within the favorable units of
the Chon Aike Formation. Occurrences of lead and zinc mineralization have also been discovered. Locally, the rocks of the Deseado
Massif are covered by Tertiary-aged basalt and younger unconsolidated sediments, that post-date silver and gold mineralization.
In January 2017, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Joaquin silver-gold exploration project for total consideration
of $25.0 million. The Company will also retain a 2.0% NSR royalty on the Joaquin project. The transaction is expected to close
in the first quarter of 2017, subject to customary closing conditions.
OPERATING STATISTICS
Ore tons milled
Ore grade silver (oz./ton)
Ore grade gold (oz./ton)
Recovery/Ag oz. (%)
Recovery/Au oz. (%)
Silver produced (oz.)
Gold produced (oz.)
Costs applicable to sales per silver
equivalent oz.(1)
Costs applicable to sales per
average spot silver equivalent oz.(1) $
$
2016
1,078,888
4.66
0.08
88.4
86.5
4,442,164
73,913
Palmarejo
2015
1,616,668
3.78
0.05
84.3
80.6
5,148,612
70,922
2014
2,135,088
3.97
0.05
77.5
80.5
6,558,091
86,673
2016
19,555,998
0.57
0.003
41.0
85.9
4,564,138
50,751
Rochester
2015
16,414,302
0.63
0.003
44.7
100.2
4,630,738
52,588
2014
13,154,429
0.57
0.004
50.0
85.7
4,189,071
44,888
10.72
9.73
$
$
14.07
12.75
$
$
15.40
14.69
$
$
11.90
10.97
$
$
12.41
11.32
$
$
14.49
13.94
Ore tons milled
Ore grade gold (oz./ton)
Recovery/Au oz. (%)
Gold produced (oz.)
Costs applicable to sales per gold
equivalent oz.(1)
2016
620,209
0.21
94.8
124,331
Kensington
2015
660,464
0.20
94.9
126,266
2014
635,960
0.20
94.0
117,823
2016
4,268,105
0.03
94.3
109,175
Wharf
2015
3,600,279
0.03
89.5
78,132
$
795
$
803
$
951
$
606
$
706
$
Ore tons milled
Ore grade silver (oz./ton)
Recovery/Ag oz. (%)
Silver produced (oz.)
Costs applicable to sales per silver
equivalent oz.(1)
(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures
2016
1,666,787
3.69
88.8
5,468,898
San Bartolomé
2015
1,713,079
3.75
84.6
5,436,353
2014
1,749,423
3.80
88.1
5,851,678
2016
219,430
2.48
45.6
247,998
Endeavor
2015
767,314
1.87
43.8
629,167
$
13.71
$
13.80
$
14.29
$
6.56
$
5.72
$
7.17
2014
—
—
—
—
—
2014
792,694
1.63
45.6
589,585
29
PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES
Silver Reserves at December 31, 2016(1)(2)(3)
Proven Reserves
Probable Reserves
Proven and Probable Reserves
Palmarejo(4)
Rochester(5)
San Bartolomé(6)
Endeavor(7)
Tons
(000s)
1,569
143,686
5,563
476
Grade
(oz./ton)
4.44
0.48
3.32
2.48
Ounces
(000s)
6,971
68,369
18,485
1,181
Tons
(000s)
7,174
101,118
765
753
Grade
(oz./ton)
4.72
0.43
3.48
1.92
Ounces
(000s)
33,847
43,676
2,659
1,449
Tons
(000s)
8,743
244,804
6,328
1,229
Grade
(oz./ton)
4.67
0.46
3.34
2.14
Total Silver
151,294
95,006
109,810
81,631
261,104
Ounces
(000s)
Metallurgical
Recovery
40,818
112,045
21,144
2,630
176,637
88%
61%
88%
50%
Gold Reserves at December 31, 2016(1)(2)(3)
Proven Reserves
Probable Reserves
Proven and Probable Reserves
Tons
(000s)
1,133
1,569
143,686
9,453
155,841
Grade
(oz./ton)
0.194
0.080
0.004
0.031
Ounces
220,000
126,000
Tons
(000s)
1,483
7,174
503,000
101,118
294,000
15,581
Grade
(oz./ton)
0.187
0.065
0.003
0.022
Ounces
277,000
466,000
Tons
(000s)
2,616
8,743
300,000
244,804
345,000
25,034
Grade
(oz./ton)
0.190
0.068
0.003
0.026
Ounces
Metallurgical
Recovery
497,000
592,000
803,000
639,000
95%
89%
92%
95%
1,143,000
125,356
1,388,000
281,197
2,531,000
Kensington(8)
Palmarejo(4)
Rochester(5)
Wharf(9)
Total Gold
Silver Reserves at December 31, 2015(1)(2)(3)
Proven Reserves
Probable Reserves
Proven and Probable Reserves
Palmarejo(4)
Rochester(5)
San Bartolomé(6)
Endeavor(7)
Tons
(000s)
802
96,520
6,850
904
Grade
(oz./ton)
6.29
0.53
3.32
2.18
Total Silver
105,076
Ounces
(000s)
Tons
(000s)
5,048
51,007
22,742
1,969
80,766
8,297
54,171
1,388
849
64,705
Grade
(oz./ton)
4.81
0.52
3.69
2.12
Ounces
(000s)
39,871
28,336
5,122
1,800
Tons
(000s)
9,099
150,691
8,238
1,753
Grade
(oz./ton)
4.94
0.53
3.38
2.15
75,129
169,781
Ounces
(000s)
Metallurgical
Recovery
44,919
79,343
27,864
3,769
155,895
85-87%
61%
74-84%
50%
Gold Reserves at December 31, 2015(1)(2)(3)
Proven Reserves
Probable Reserves
Proven and Probable Reserves
Grade
(oz./ton)
0.198
0.077
0.003
0.032
Tons
(000s)
338
802
96,520
11,791
109,451
Ounces
67,008
62,100
316,000
374,135
819,243
Tons
(000s)
2,487
8,297
54,171
14,984
79,939
Grade
(oz./ton)
0.198
0.076
0.003
0.023
Ounces
493,293
628,000
Tons
(000s)
2,825
9,099
161,000
150,691
337,955
26,775
1,620,248
189,390
Grade
(oz./ton)
0.198
0.076
0.003
0.027
Ounces
Metallurgical
Recovery
560,301
95%
690,100
87-90%
477,000
712,090
2,439,491
92%
80%
Kensington(8)
Palmarejo(4)
Rochester(5)
Wharf(9)
Total Gold
(1) Certain definitions:
The term “reserve” means that part of a mineral deposit that can be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.
The term “proven (measured) reserves” means reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill
holes, grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurements are spaced so
closely and the geologic character is sufficiently defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well established.
The term “probable (indicated) reserves” means reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for
proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree
of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation. Proven and
probable reserves include silver attributable to Coeur’s ownership or economic interest in the Endeavor project.
The term “cutoff grade” means the lowest grade of mineralized material considered economic to process. Cutoff grades vary between deposits depending
upon prevailing economic conditions, minerability of the deposit, by-products, amenability of the mineralized material to silver or gold extraction and type
of milling or leaching facilities available.
(2) Effective at December 31, 2016, except Endeavor effective July 1, 2016. Assumed metal prices for proven and probable reserves were $17.50 per ounce of
silver and $1,250 per ounce of gold, except Endeavor at $1,800 per metric ton of lead, $2,200 per metric ton of zinc, and $20.00 per ounce of silver. Assumed
metal prices for estimated 2015 proven and probable reserves were $17.50 per ounce of silver and $1,250 per ounce of gold.
(3) Mineral reserve estimates, with the exception of Endeavor, were prepared by the Company's technical staff. Endeavor mineral reserve estimates were prepared
by the CBH Resources Ltd. staff and reviewed by the Company’s technical staff.
30 (4) Calculated based on cutoff assuming the metal prices noted above. The cutoff grades for mineral reserves range from 0.52 to 0.58 g/tonne AuEq. AuEq
factor based on [($Price Au) / ($Price Ag)] x [(%Recovery Au)/(%Recovery Ag)] x [(%Payable Au)/(%Payable Ag)].
(5) The cutoff grade for mineral reserves is 2.6 to 3.2 oz/ton AgEq.
(6) The cutoff grades for mineral reserves range from 81 to 107 g/tonne Ag based on material.
(7) Effective at July 1, 2016, thus excluding additions or depletions through December 31, 2016. Mineral reserves were estimated with a cutoff grade of 7.0%
combined lead and zinc.
(8) The cutoff grade for mineral reserves is 0.13 oz/ton Au.
(9) The cutoff grade for mineral reserves is 0.012 oz/ton Au.
MINERALIZED MATERIAL
Palmarejo Mine, Mexico(5)
San Bartolomé Mine, Bolivia(6)
Kensington Mine, USA(7)
Wharf Mine, USA(8)
Rochester Mine, USA(9)
Endeavor Mine, Australia(10)
La Preciosa Project, Mexico(11)
Joaquin Project, Argentina(12)
Lejano Project, Argentina(13)
Total Mineralized Material
Palmarejo Mine, Mexico(5)
San Bartolomé Mine, Bolivia(6)
Kensington Mine, USA(7)
Wharf Mine, USA(8)
Rochester Mine, USA(9)
Endeavor Mine, Australia(10)
La Preciosa Project, Mexico(11)
Joaquin Project, Argentina(12)
Lejano Project, Argentina(13)
Martha Property, Argentina(14)
Total Mineralized Material
Mineralized Material at December 31, 2016(1)(2)(3)(4)
Silver Grade (oz./ton)
Tons (000s)
Gold Grade (oz./ton)
4,900
1,861
3,125
4,914
69,461
13,542
38,974
10,252
631
147,660
3.52
2.17
—
—
0.56
2.08
2.96
5.02
3.09
0.048
—
0.279
0.026
0.003
—
0.005
0.004
0.011
Mineralized Material at December 31, 2015(1)(2)(3)(4)
Silver Grade (oz./ton)
Tons (000s)
Gold Grade (oz./ton)
5,922
8,060
1,832
6,564
140,951
13,569
38,974
10,252
631
57
226,812
4.27
2.10
—
—
0.48
2.29
2.96
5.02
3.09
13.57
0.056
—
0.283
0.025
0.003
—
0.005
0.004
0.011
0.017
(1) Assumed metal prices for estimated 2016 mineralized material were $19.00 per ounce of silver and $1,275 per ounce of gold, except (a) Endeavor at $2,200
per tonne zinc, $1,800 per tonne lead and $20.00 per ounce of silver. 2016 mineralized material effective December 31, 2016, except where otherwise noted.
Assumed metal prices for estimated 2015 mineralized material were $19.00 per ounce of silver and $1,275 per ounce of gold.
(2) Estimated with mining cost parameters and initial metallurgical test results.
(3) Estimates were prepared by a number of different consulting groups and supervised by the Company's personnel.
(4) Estimated using 3-dimensional geologic modeling and geostatistical evaluation of the exploration drill data. Mineralized material is reported exclusive of
reserves. “Mineralized material” as used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, although permissible under Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by SEC
standards. There is no certainty that any part of the reported mineralized material will ever be confirmed or converted into Guide 7 compliant “reserves”.
(5) Calculated based on cutoff assuming the metal prices noted above. The cutoff grades for mineralized material range from 2.6 to 3.2 g/tonne AuEq. AuEq
factor based on [($Price Au) / ($Price Ag)] x [(%Recovery Au)/(%Recovery Ag)] x [(%Payable Au)/(%Payable Ag)]
(6) Cutoff grades for mineralized material is 95 g/tonne.
(7) The cutoff grade for mineralized material is 0.13 oz/ton Au.
(8) The cutoff grade for mineralized material is 0.012 oz/ton Au.
(9) The cutoff grade for mineralized material is 0.49 oz/ton AgEq.
(10) Effective July 1, 2016. Prepared by CBH Resources Ltd. staff and reviewed by the Company’s technical staff.
(11) No changes were made to cutoff grades in 2016 for the La Preciosa project.
(12) No changes were made to cutoff grades in 2016 for the Joaquin project.
(13) No changes were made to cutoff grades in 2016 for the Lejano project.
(14) In May 2016, Coeur sold its Martha assets and related liabilities in Argentina.
31 Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
For a discussion of legal proceedings, see Note 21 - Commitments and Contingencies in the notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included herein.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Information pertaining to mine safety matters is reported in accordance with Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in Exhibit 95.1 attached to this Form 10-K.
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sales prices of the common stock as
reported by the New York Stock Exchange:
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
2016
First Quarter through February 7, 2017
2016
2015
High
Low
High
Low
$
$
$
$
$
5.80
10.66
15.98
11.81
11.92
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1.73
5.55
11.26
8.72
9.74
7.27
6.33
5.81
3.34
$
$
$
$
4.44
4.71
2.70
2.41
The Company has not paid cash dividends on its common stock since 1996. Future dividends, if any, will be determined
by the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend upon the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, capital
requirements and other factors.
On February 6, 2017, there were outstanding 181,055,852 shares of the Company’s common stock which were held by
approximately 1,484 stockholders of record.
32
STOCK PERFORMANCE CHART
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG COEUR MINING, S&P 500 INDEX AND PEER GROUP INDEX
The following performance graph compares the performance of the Company's common stock during the period beginning
December 31, 2011 and ending December 31, 2016 to the S&P 500 and a Peer Group Index consisting of the following companies:
Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited, Alamos Gold Inc., Centerra Gold Inc., First Majestic Silver Corp., Hecla Mining Company,
Hochschild Mining plc, IAMGOLD Corporation, New Gold, Inc., OceanaGold Corporation, Pan American Silver Corporation,
Primero Mining Corp, Silver Standard Resources, Inc., Stillwater Mining Company and Tahoe Resources Inc. ("New Peer Group").
The Company formerly used a Peer Group Index consisting of the following companies: Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited, Alamos
Gold Inc., Allied Nevada Gold Corporation, Centerra Gold Inc. First Majestic Silver Corp., Hecla Mining Company, Hochschild
Mining plc, New Gold Inc., Pan American Silver Corporation, Silver Standard Resources, Inc. and Stillwater Mining Company
("Old Peer Group"). The Company has determined that the New Peer Group is a more relevant group of companies for purposes
of the comparison of cumulative total return contained in the performance graph.
The graph assumes a $100 investment in the Company's common stock and in each of the indexes at the beginning of
the period, and a reinvestment of dividends paid on such investments throughout the five-year period.
Coeur Mining
S&P 500 Index
New Peer Group
Old Peer Group
Dec.
2012
Dec.
2013
Dec.
2014
Dec.
2015
Dec.
2016
101.91
116.00
109.93
111.13
44.95
153.57
65.46
62.69
21.17
174.60
67.48
60.07
10.27
177.01
52.48
50.18
37.66
198.18
85.49
96.76
33
The following performance graph compares the performance of the Company's common stock during the period beginning
December 31, 2015 and ending December 31, 2016 to the S&P 500 and the New Peer Group. The graph assumes a $100 investment
in the Company's common stock and in each of the indexes at the beginning of the period, and a reinvestment of dividends paid
on such investments throughout the period.
Coeur Mining
Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 June-16 July-16 Aug-16 Sept-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16
366.53
226.61
450.81
389.11
429.84
303.63
617.74
477.02
513.71
326.61
155.65
89.11
S&P 500 Index
95.04
94.91
101.35
101.74
103.57
103.84
107.66
107.82
107.84
105.87
109.79
111.96
New Peer Group
98.39
126.11
138.23
179.79
160.14
200.91
221.19
184.02
194.12
181.86
161.53
162.91
This stock performance information is “furnished” and shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or subject to
Rule 14A, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that
section, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference
language in any such filing, except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference.
34 Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements and accompanying Notes.
Revenue
Costs applicable to sales
Net income (loss)
Basic net income (loss) per share
Diluted net income (loss) per share
Total assets
Reclamation and mine closure liabilities
Debt, including current portion
Stockholders’ equity
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Year ended December 31,
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
665,777
409,541
55,352
0.35
0.34
2016
1,318,909
99,326
210,896
768,487
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
646,086
479,654
(367,183) $
$
635,742
477,945
(1,186,874) $
$
745,994
463,663
(650,563) $
(2.83) $
(2.83) $
(11.59) $
(11.59) $
(6.65) $
(6.65) $
895,492
454,562
48,677
0.54
0.54
At December 31,
2015
1,332,489
85,268
490,410
421,476
$
$
$
$
2014
1,436,569
70,814
468,546
554,328
$
$
$
$
2013
2,885,978
58,428
297,823
1,730,567
$
$
$
$
2012
3,221,401
35,338
55,730
2,198,280
35 Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) provides information that management believes is
relevant to an assessment and understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Coeur Mining,
Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively “the Company”, “our”, or “we”). We use certain non-GAAP financial performance measures
in our MD&A. For a detailed description of non-GAAP measures, please see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures” at
the end of this item.
We provide certain operational and financial data on a silver equivalent basis, converting gold to silver at a 60:1 ratio of
silver ounces to gold ounces unless otherwise noted. We also provide realized silver equivalent data determined by average spot
silver and gold prices during the relevant period.
Overview
We are a gold and silver producer with mines located in the United States, Mexico, and Bolivia and exploration projects
in the United States, Mexico and Argentina. The Palmarejo complex, Rochester, Kensington, Wharf, and San Bartolomé mines
constitute our principal sources of revenue. The Company also owns Coeur Capital, which is primarily comprised of the Endeavor
silver stream.
The Company's strategy is to discover, acquire, develop and operate low-cost silver and gold mines that produce long-
term cash flow, provide opportunities for growth through continued exploration, and generate superior and sustainable returns for
stockholders. Management focuses on maximizing net cash flow through identifying and implementing revenue enhancement
opportunities, reducing operating and non-operating costs, exercising consistent capital discipline, and efficient working capital
management.
2016 Highlights
• Net income of $55.4 million ($0.34 per share) and adjusted net income of $47.8 million ($0.29 per share) (see “Non-
GAAP Financial Performance Measures”)
•
Production of 36.3 million silver equivalent ounces, consisting of 14.8 million silver ounces and 358,170 gold ounces
• Costs applicable to sales were $11.87 per silver equivalent ounce ($11.12 per average spot silver equivalent ounce) and
$705 per gold equivalent ounce (see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”)
• All-in sustaining costs were $16.08 per silver equivalent ounce ($14.27 per average spot silver equivalent ounce) (see
“Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”)
• Operating cash flow of $125.8 million and adjusted EBITDA of $215.2 million (see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance
Measures”)
• Reduced debt by 57%, primarily through the $99.0 million voluntary repayment of the Term Loan due 2020 (“Term
Loan”) and the repurchase of $200.8 million aggregate principal of the 7.875% Senior Notes due 2021 (“Senior Notes”)
•
•
Satisfied minimum obligation under the Palmarejo royalty agreement; now operating under gold stream agreement with
more favorable terms ($800 per ounce purchase price rather than $416 per ounce cost contribution under former royalty
agreement) that are expected to significantly increase free cash flow at Palmarejo
Sale of non-core royalty assets completed for total consideration of $23.8 million, including $1.7 million in contingent
consideration
• Capital expenditures of $101.0 million, primarily for the development of the Jualin deposit at Kensington and the
Guadalupe and Independencia mines at Palmarejo
• Completed two “at the market” stock offerings, selling a combined 26.9 million shares of common stock for net proceeds
of $269.6 million
• Cash and cash equivalents of $162.2 million at December 31, 2016
36
Selected Financial and Operating Results
Metal sales
Net income (loss)
Net income (loss) per share, diluted
Adjusted net income (loss)(1)
Adjusted net income (loss) per share, diluted(1)
EBITDA(1)
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Silver ounces produced
Gold ounces produced
Silver equivalent ounces produced
Silver ounces sold
Gold ounces sold
Silver equivalent ounces sold
Average realized price per silver ounce
Average realized price per gold ounce
Costs applicable to sales per silver equivalent ounce(1)
Costs applicable to sales per average spot silver equivalent ounce(1)
Costs applicable to sales per gold equivalent ounce(1)
All-in sustaining costs per silver equivalent ounce(1)
All-in sustaining costs per average spot silver equivalent ounce(1)
(1) See “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.”
Consolidated Financial Results
2016 compared to 2015
Net Income (Loss)
Year ended December 31,
2016
662,497
55,352
0.34
47,783
0.29
161,194
215,160
2015
639,236
(367,183)
(2.83)
(103,642)
(0.80)
(203,992)
127,851
2014
632,526
(1,186,874)
(11.59)
(175,442)
(1.71)
(1,405,146)
92,001
14,828,342
15,900,614
17,188,425
358,170
327,908
249,384
36,318,542
35,575,094
32,151,465
14,344,806
16,506,819
17,423,662
338,131
335,882
242,655
34,632,666
17.18
1,230
11.87
11.12
705
16.08
14.27
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
36,659,759
15.46
1,143
13.23
12.31
768
16.50
14.62
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
31,982,962
18.87
1,252
14.71
14.24
951
19.72
18.81
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Net income was $55.4 million ($0.34 per share) compared to a Net loss of $367.2 million ($2.83 per share). The increase
in Net income is primarily due to asset write-downs in 2015 and higher gold production, a reduction in deferred tax valuation
allowances and other deferred tax benefits, higher average realized silver and gold prices, lower all-in sustaining costs per silver
equivalent ounce, and lower interest expense, partially offset by lower silver production and unfavorable fair value adjustments.
Revenue
Metal sales increased due to an 11% and 8% increase in average realized silver and gold prices, respectively, and higher
gold ounces sold, partially offset by lower silver ounces sold. The Company sold 14.3 million silver ounces and 338,131 gold
ounces, compared to sales of 16.5 million silver ounces and 335,882 gold ounces. Gold contributed 63% of sales and silver
contributed 37%, compared to 60% of sales from gold and 40% from silver. Royalty revenue was lower due to the Company's
divestiture of several non-core royalty assets in 2016.
Costs Applicable to Sales
Costs applicable to sales decreased due to lower silver and gold unit costs and lower silver ounces sold. For a complete
discussion of costs applicable to sales, see Results of Operations below.
37
Amortization
Amortization decreased $20.6 million, or 14%, primarily due to lower silver equivalent ounces sold and lower amortizable
mineral interest and mining equipment that resulted from the 2015 write-down.
Expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased 11% due to lower professional services and compensation costs.
Exploration expense increased $1.3 million, due to the Company's expansion of drilling activities at Palmarejo, Kensington
and Rochester as well as regional exploration with a focus on projects in Nevada and Chihuahua, Mexico.
Pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses decreased 3% to $17.2 million as a result of lower transaction related
costs.
Write-downs were $4.4 million ($3.9 million net of tax) compared to $313.3 million ($276.5 million net of tax). The $4.4
million ($3.9 million net of tax) write-downs in 2016 were primarily related to the Company's silver stream on the Endeavor mine
in Australia as a result of the decision by the mine operator to significantly curtail production due to low lead and zinc prices.
Other Income and Expenses
In 2016, the Company incurred a loss of $21.4 million on the extinguishment of debt in connection with the repayment
of the Term Loan and a portion of its outstanding Senior Notes compared to a $15.9 million gain on the exchange of Senior Notes
for common stock in 2015.
Non-cash fair value adjustments, net, were a loss of $11.6 million compared to a gain of $5.2 million, primarily due to
the impact of changes in future metal prices on the Palmarejo gold production royalty (termination effective in the third quarter
of 2016) and the Rochester 3.4% NSR royalty obligation.
Interest expense (net of capitalized interest of $1.2 million) decreased to $36.9 million from $45.7 million, primarily due
to the repayment of the Term Loan, the redemption of $200.8 million of Senior Notes and lower accretion of the terminated
Palmarejo gold production royalty obligation.
Other, net increased by $17.8 million, primarily due to a $5.3 million pre-tax gain on the sale of Martha assets in Argentina,
a $7.8 million pre-tax gain on the sale of non-core royalty assets, and gains from the sale of investments.
Income and Mining Taxes
The Company’s Income and mining tax (expense) benefit consisted of:
Year ended December 31,
In thousands
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit at statutory rate
State tax provision from continuing operations
2016
$
(390) $
336
Change in valuation allowance
Percentage depletion
Uncertain tax positions
U.S. and foreign non-deductible expenses
Mineral interest related
Foreign exchange rates
Foreign inflation and indexing
Foreign tax rate differences
Foreign withholding and other taxes
Foreign tax credits and other, net
Legal entity reorganization
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit
$
61,146
983
(4,619)
(5,764)
—
19,701
2,794
413
(13,478)
102
(6,985)
54,239
2015
137,706
(2,075)
(101,027)
—
(1,947)
1,365
(19,310)
22,350
1,117
(15,980)
8,140
(4,076)
—
$
26,263
38
Income and mining tax benefit of approximately $54.2 million results in an effective tax rate of 4,873% for 2016. This
compares to income tax benefit of $26.3 million or effective tax rate of 6.7% for 2015. The Company’s effective tax rate is impacted
by multiple factors as illustrated above. The 2016 effective tax rate differs from 2015 primarily due to the completion of a legal
entity reorganization to integrate recent acquisitions resulting in a valuation allowance release of $40.8 million, recording a $15.0
million deferred tax benefit related to unremitted earnings, changes in valuation allowances on deferred tax assets, including the
impacts of mineral interest impairments, and lower foreign withholding taxes.
The Company’s effective tax rate is impacted by recurring items, such as foreign exchange rates on deferred tax balances,
impacts of mineral interest impairments, full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets relating to losses in the United States
and certain foreign jurisdictions, mining tax expense and uncertain tax positions. In addition, the Company's consolidated effective
income tax rate is a function of the combined effective tax rates and foreign exchange rates in the jurisdictions in which it operates.
Variations in the jurisdictional mix of income and loss and foreign exchange rates result in significant fluctuations in its consolidated
effective tax rate. The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s income (loss) before tax and income and
mining tax (expense) benefit:
In thousands
United States
Argentina
Mexico
Bolivia
Other jurisdictions
Year ended December 31, 2016
Year ended December 31, 2015
Income (loss) before tax
Tax (expense) benefit
Income (loss) before tax
Tax (expense) benefit
$
$
(13,112) $
4,216
$
(43,924) $
3,099
(5,268)
11,738
4,656
124
45,801
6,252
(2,154)
(3,869)
(250,054)
(76,739)
(18,860)
1,113 $
54,239
$
(393,446) $
(527)
(482)
26,713
(5,154)
5,713
26,263
A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related benefits will
not be realized. The Company analyzes its deferred tax assets and if it is determined that the Company will not realize all or a
portion of its deferred tax assets, it will record or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if it is determined that the Company
will ultimately be able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or
a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of risk factors that could impact the Company’s
ability to realize its deferred tax assets.
2015 compared to 2014
Net Income (Loss)
Net loss was $367.2 million ($2.83 per share) compared to a Net loss of $1,186.9 million ($11.59 per share). The lower
Net loss in 2015 is primarily due to lower write-downs, higher gold ounces sold, lower costs applicable to sales per silver and gold
ounce, and lower general and administrative expenses, partially offset by lower average realized silver and gold prices and lower
silver ounces sold.
Revenue
Metal sales increased 2% due to higher gold ounces sold, partially offset by lower average realized silver and gold prices
and lower silver ounces sold. The Company realized average silver and gold prices of $15.46 per ounce and $1,143 per ounce,
respectively, compared with average realized prices of $18.87 per ounce and $1,252 per ounce, respectively. The Company sold
16.5 million silver ounces and 335,882 gold ounces, compared to sales of 17.4 million silver ounces and 242,655 gold ounces.
Gold contributed 60% of sales and silver contributed 40%, compared to 48% of sales from gold and 52% from silver. Royalty
revenue increased $3.6 million due to commencement of production at the Correnso mine, as well as higher production from Cerro
Bayo and El Gallo mines (Coeur Capital held royalties on each of these mines).
Costs Applicable to Sales
Costs applicable to sales were lower due to lower unit costs at all mine sites and lower silver ounces sold, partially offset
by higher gold ounces sold. For a complete discussion of costs applicable to sales, see Results of Operations below.
Amortization
Amortization decreased by $18.7 million, or 12%, primarily due to lower amortizable mineral interests and mining
equipment, partially offset by higher silver equivalent production.
39
Expenses
General and administrative expenses decreased $8.0 million, or 20%, primarily due to lower compensation and
professional services costs.
Exploration expense decreased $10.1 million, or 46%, due to decreased drilling activity at Palmarejo, Kensington, and
Rochester.
Pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses decreased 32% to $17.8 million, primarily due to the completion of
the La Preciosa feasibility study in 2014.
Write-downs were $313.3 million ($276.5 million net of tax) compared to $1,472.7 million ($1,021.8 million net of tax).
The non-cash impairment charges were largely driven by decreases in long-term metal price assumptions and revised mine plans
in the fourth quarter. The 2015 write-down was primarily related to the Palmarejo complex, San Bartolomé, and Coeur Capital.
Other Income and Expenses
In 2015, the Company incurred a $15.9 million gain on the exchange of the Senior Notes for common stock.
Non-cash fair value adjustments, net, were a gain of $5.2 million compared to a gain of $3.6 million, primarily due to
the impact of changes in future metal prices on the Palmarejo gold production royalty and the Rochester 3.4% NSR royalty
obligation.
Interest expense (net of capitalized interest of $3.1 million) decreased to $45.7 million from $47.5 million primarily due
to the write-off of costs associated with the termination of a former revolving credit facility in 2014, lower accretion of the Palmarejo
gold production royalty obligation, and higher capitalized interest, partially offset by interest expense associated with additional
borrowings.
Other, net decreased by $10.7 million, primarily due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Income and Mining Taxes
The Company’s Income and mining tax (expense) benefit consisted of:
In thousands
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit at statutory rate
State tax provision from continuing operations
Change in valuation allowance
Uncertain tax positions
U.S. and foreign non-deductible expenses
Mineral interest related
Foreign exchange rates
Foreign inflation and indexing
Foreign tax rate differences
Foreign withholding and other taxes
Foreign tax credits and other, net
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit
Year ended December 31,
2015
137,706
(2,075)
(101,027)
(1,947)
1,365
(19,310)
22,350
1,117
(15,980)
8,140
(4,076)
26,263
$
$
2014
565,295
20,253
(151,191)
(4,425)
(4,892)
—
23,672
3,765
(63,930)
82,884
(43,177)
428,254
$
$
Income and mining tax benefit of approximately $26.3 million results in an effective tax rate of 6.7% for 2015. This
compares to income tax benefit of $428.3 million or effective tax rate of 26.5% for 2014. The Company’s effective tax rate is
impacted by multiple factors as illustrated above. The 2015 effective tax rate differs from 2014 primarily due to changes in valuation
allowances on deferred tax assets, including the impacts of mineral interest impairments, and lower foreign withholding taxes.
The Company’s effective tax rate is impacted by recurring items, such as foreign exchange rates on deferred tax balances,
impacts of mineral interest impairments, full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets relating to losses in the United States
and certain foreign jurisdictions, mining tax expense and uncertain tax positions. In addition, the Company's consolidated effective
income tax rate is a function of the combined effective tax rates and foreign exchange rates in the jurisdictions in which it operates.
Variations in the jurisdictional mix of income and loss and foreign exchange rates result in significant fluctuations in its consolidated
40
effective tax rate. The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s income (loss) before tax and income and
mining tax (expense) benefit:
In thousands
United States
Argentina
Mexico
Bolivia
Other jurisdictions
Year ended December 31, 2015
Year ended December 31, 2014
Income (loss) before tax
Tax (expense) benefit
Income (loss) before tax
Tax (expense) benefit
$
$
(43,924) $
(527) $
(213,883) $
(3,869)
(250,054)
(76,739)
(18,860)
(482)
26,713
(5,154)
5,713
(82,093)
(1,204,983)
(107,547)
(6,622)
(393,446) $
26,263
$
(1,615,128) $
(482)
24,408
384,099
18,114
2,115
428,254
A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related benefits will
not be realized. The Company analyzes its deferred tax assets and if it is determined that the Company will not realize all or a
portion of its deferred tax assets, it will record or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if it is determined that the Company
will ultimately be able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or
a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of risk factors that could impact the Company’s
ability to realize its deferred tax assets.
2017 Outlook
In 2017, through our focus on operational excellence, cost reduction initiatives, and capital discipline, we expect to
achieve the following:
• A 9% increase in silver equivalent1 production driven by the continued ramp-up of Palmarejo underground operations
• AISC between $15.75 - $16.25 per AgEqOz1 consistent with 2016 result of $16.08 per AgEqOz1
• Higher capital investment driven by carry-over from 2016 and ongoing projects at Palmarejo, Rochester and Kensington
• Higher exploration primarily due to step-out drilling at Palmarejo and definition drilling at La Preciosa
2017 Production Outlook
(silver and silver equivalent ounces in thousands)
Silver
Gold
6,500 - 7,000
4,200 - 4,700
5,400 - 5,900
300 - 400
—
—
110,000 - 120,000
47,000 - 52,000
—
—
120,000 - 125,000
85,000 - 90,000
Silver Equivalent1
13,100 - 14,200
7,020 - 7,820
5,400 - 5,900
300 - 400
7,200 - 7,500
5,100 - 5,400
16,400 - 18,000
362,000 - 387,000
38,120 - 41,220
Palmarejo
Rochester
San Bartolomé
Endeavor
Kensington
Wharf
Total
2017 Cost Outlook
41
(dollars in millions, except per ounce amounts)
CAS per AgEqOz1 – Palmarejo
CAS per AgEqOz1 – Rochester
CAS per AgOz1 – San Bartolomé
CAS per AuOz1 – Kensington
CAS per AuEqOz1 – Wharf
Capital Expenditures
General and Administrative Expenses
Exploration Expense
AISC per AgEqOz1
(1) See “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.”
2017 Guidance
$10.00 - $10.50
$11.50 - $12.00
$14.00 - $14.50
$800 - $850
$775 - $825
$115 - $135
$28 - $32
$23 - $25
$15.75 - $16.25
42 Results of Operations
The Company produced 14.8 million ounces of silver and 358,170 ounces of gold in the year ended December 31, 2016,
compared to 15.9 million ounces of silver and 327,908 ounces of gold in the year ended December 31, 2015. Silver production
decreased 6.7% due to lower mill throughput at Palmarejo as the mine transitioned to a lower-tonnage, higher-grade, higher-margin
underground operation, timing of leach pad recoveries at Rochester, and lower mining rates at Endeavor. Gold production increased
9.2% due to higher grade and recovery at Palmarejo, higher grade and tons placed at Wharf as well as a full-year of production at
Wharf.
The Company produced 15.9 million ounces of silver and 327,908 ounces of gold in the year ended December 31, 2015,
compared to 17.2 million ounces of silver and 249,384 ounces of gold in the year ended December 31, 2014. Silver production
decreased due to lower throughput at Palmarejo and San Bartolomé, partially offset by higher grade and tons placed at Rochester.
Gold production increased due to the acquisition of Wharf and higher throughput at Kensington.
Costs applicable to sales were $11.87 per silver equivalent ounce ($11.12 per average spot silver equivalent ounce) and
$705 per gold equivalent ounce in the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $13.23 per silver equivalent ounce ($12.31 per
average spot silver equivalent ounce) and $768 per gold equivalent ounce in the year ended December 31, 2015. Costs applicable
to sales per silver equivalent ounce decreased 10% in 2016 due to lower unit costs at Palmarejo, Rochester, and San Bartolomé,
partially offset by higher unit costs at Endeavor. Costs applicable to sales per gold equivalent ounce decreased 8% in 2016 due to
lower unit costs at Wharf and Kensington.
Costs applicable to sales were $13.23 per silver equivalent ounce ($12.31 per average spot silver equivalent ounce) and
$768 per gold equivalent ounce in the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $14.71 per silver equivalent ounce ($14.24 per
average spot silver equivalent ounce) and $951 per gold equivalent ounce in the year ended December 31, 2014. Costs applicable
to sales per silver equivalent ounce decreased in 2015 due to lower unit costs at Rochester and Palmarejo. Costs applicable to sales
per gold equivalent ounce decreased in 2015 due to lower unit costs at Kensington and the addition of Wharf.
All-in sustaining costs were $16.08 per silver equivalent ounce ($14.27 per average spot silver equivalent ounce) in the
year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $16.50 per silver equivalent ounce ($14.62 per average spot silver equivalent ounce)
in the year ended December 31, 2015. The 3% decrease in all-in sustaining costs per silver equivalent ounce in 2016 was primarily
due to lower costs applicable to sales per consolidated silver equivalent ounce and lower general and administrative costs, partially
offset by higher sustaining capital expenditures and exploration expense.
All-in sustaining costs were $16.50 per silver equivalent ounce ($14.62 per average spot silver equivalent ounce) in the
year ended December 31, 2015, compared to $19.72 per silver equivalent ounce ($18.81 per average spot silver equivalent ounce)
in the year ended December 31, 2014. The 16% reduction in all-in sustaining costs per silver equivalent ounce in the year ended
December 31, 2015 was primarily due to lower costs applicable to sales per consolidated silver equivalent ounce, lower sustaining
capital expenditures, and lower general and administrative costs.
Palmarejo
Tons milled
Silver ounces produced
Gold ounces produced
Silver equivalent ounces produced
Costs applicable to sales per silver equivalent oz(1)
$
Costs applicable to sales per average spot silver equivalent oz(1) $
(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.
2016 compared to 2015
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
1,078,888
4,442,164
73,913
8,876,944
10.72
9.73
$
$
1,616,668
5,148,612
70,922
9,403,932
14.07
12.75
$
$
2014
2,135,088
6,558,091
86,673
11,758,471
15.40
14.69
During the third quarter of 2016, the minimum ounce obligation under the Palmarejo gold production royalty was satisfied
and Palmarejo is now operating under a gold stream agreement with more favorable terms that are expected to significantly increase
free cash flow.
43
Silver equivalent production decreased 6% due to planned lower mill throughput as the mine transitioned to lower-
tonnage, higher-grade, higher-margin underground mines at Guadalupe and Independencia. Metal sales were $141.3 million, or
21% of Coeur's metal sales, compared with $169.1 million, or 27% of Coeur's metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per ounce
decreased 24% as a result of lower waste tons mined, lower milling, diesel and consumables costs, and favorable currency exchange
rates. Amortization increased to $36.6 million compared to $32.4 million, primarily due to production from Guadalupe and
Independencia. Capital expenditures remained comparable at $35.8 million as the Company continues underground development
at Guadalupe and Independencia.
2015 compared to 2014
Silver equivalent production decreased 20% due to planned lower mill throughput as the mine transitioned to a lower-
tonnage, higher grade underground operation from a predominantly open pit operation. Metal sales were $169.1 million, or 27%
of Coeur's metal sales, compared with $244.0 million, or 39% of Coeur's metal sales due to lower production and the addition of
Wharf. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased as a result of lower waste tons mined, lower milling, diesel, and consumables
costs, favorable currency exchange rates, and lower maintenance costs due to the wind-down of open pit mining. Amortization
decreased to $32.4 million compared to $69.4 million due to lower production and amortizable mineral interests and mining
equipment. Capital expenditures increased to $36.0 million compared to $26.1 million due to the underground development of
the Guadalupe and Independencia deposits.
Rochester
Tons placed
Silver ounces produced
Gold ounces produced
Silver equivalent ounces produced
Costs applicable to sales per silver equivalent oz(1)
$
Costs applicable to sales per average spot silver equivalent oz(1) $
(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.
2016 compared to 2015
Year ended December 31,
2016
19,555,998
4,564,138
50,751
7,609,198
11.90
10.97
$
$
2015
16,414,302
4,630,738
52,588
7,786,018
12.41
11.32
$
$
2014
14,739,808
4,189,071
44,888
6,882,351
14.49
13.94
Silver equivalent production decreased 2% due to lower silver grades and timing of recoveries, partially offset by higher
tons placed. Metal sales were $139.9 million, or 21% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $143.9 million, or 23% of Coeur's
metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per silver equivalent ounce decreased 4%, primarily due to lower mining and processing
costs. Amortization decreased to $21.8 million compared to $23.9 million due to lower silver and gold production. Capital
expenditures decreased to $16.4 million compared to $25.3 million due to the completion of the in-pit crusher expansion and Stage
III buttress construction in 2015.
2015 compared to 2014
Silver equivalent production increased 13% as a result of higher tons placed, higher silver grades, and timing of recoveries.
Metal sales were $143.9 million, or 23% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $123.8 million, or 20% of Coeur's metal sales.
Costs applicable to sales per silver equivalent ounce decreased due to higher production, lower diesel costs, and lower equipment
rentals. Amortization was $23.9 million compared to $20.8 million due to higher production. Capital expenditures were $25.3
million compared to $11.9 million due to in-pit crusher expansion and Stage III buttress construction in 2015.
Kensington
Tons milled
Gold ounces produced
Costs applicable to sales/oz(1)
(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
620,209
124,331
795
$
660,464
126,266
803
$
635,960
117,823
951
$
44
2016 compared to 2015
Gold production decreased 2% due to mill downtime caused by a blocked tailings line at the end of September, partially
offset by higher grade. Metal sales were $146.6 million, or 22% of Coeur's metal sales, compared to $148.7 million, or 23% of
Coeur’s metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per ounce were 1% lower, primarily due to lower diesel costs. Amortization was
$34.8 million compared to $42.2 million due to lower production. Capital expenditures were $36.8 million compared to $23.8
million, due to the continued development of the high-grade Jualin deposit.
2015 compared to 2014
Gold production increased 7% due to higher grade and mill throughput. Metal sales were $148.7 million, or 23% of
Coeur's metal sales, compared to $137.0 million which represented 22% of Coeur’s metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per ounce
decreased due to higher production, lower diesel costs, and lower contract mining services. Amortization was $42.2 million
compared to $43.6 million due to lower amortizable mineral interests and mining equipment, partially offset by higher production.
Capital expenditures were $23.8 million compared to $16.2 million, due to the underground development of the high-grade Jualin
deposit.
Wharf
Tons placed
Gold ounces produced
Silver ounces produced
Gold equivalent ounces produced(2)
Costs applicable to sales per gold equivalent oz(2)
(1) Amounts are post-acquisition (February 20, 2015).
(2) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.
2016 compared to 2015
2016
Year ended December 31,
2015(1)
2014
4,268,105
109,175
105,144
110,927
606
$
3,600,279
78,132
55,744
79,061
706
$
$
—
—
—
—
Gold equivalent production increased 40% due to higher grade and tons placed, higher plant recovery rates and a full-
year of attributable production. Metal sales were $136.7 million, or 21% of Coeur's metal sales, compared to $84.1 million, or
13% of Coeur's metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per gold equivalent ounce decreased 14%, primarily due to lower mining
and leaching costs, partially offset by a $3.7 million inventory write-down related to lower expected recoveries from leach pad 3.
Amortization was $20.6 million compared to $16.4 million due to higher production. Capital expenditures were $4.8 million
compared to $3.2 million due to the acquisition of additional equipment and capitalized drilling.
2015 compared to 2014
Gold production was 78,132 ounces in the post-acquisition period after February 20, 2015. Metal sales were $84.1 million,
or 13% of Coeur's metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per gold equivalent ounce were $706 per ounce and amortization was
$16.4 million. Capital expenditures were $3.2 million and primarily consisted of pad re-lining and capitalized drilling.
San Bartolomé
Tons milled
Silver ounces produced
Costs applicable to sales/oz(1)
(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.
2016 compared to 2015
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
1,666,787
5,468,898
13.71
$
1,713,079
5,436,353
13.80
$
1,749,423
5,851,678
14.29
$
Silver production increased 1% as higher levels of purchased ore offset lower mining rates despite a water shortage
resulting from nationwide drought conditions. Silver sales were $93.9 million, or 14% of Coeur's metal sales, compared with $84.7
million, or 13% of Coeur's metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased due to lower consumables costs. Amortization
was $6.6 million compared to $17.8 million due to lower amortizable mineral interest and mining equipment. Capital expenditures
were $6.6 million compared to $6.2 million.
45
2015 compared to 2014
Silver production decreased 7% due to a three-week shutdown in July as a result of political protests and lower recoveries,
partially offset by higher grade supplemental ore purchases. Silver sales were $84.7 million, or 13% of Coeur's metal sales,
compared with $117.7 million, or 19% of Coeur's metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per ounce was lower due to lower revenue-
based royalty payments. Amortization was $17.8 million compared to $19.4 million due to lower production. Capital expenditures
were $6.2 million compared to $7.9 million.
Coeur Capital
Endeavor Silver Stream
Tons milled
Silver ounces produced
Costs applicable to sales/oz(1)
(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.
2016 compared to 2015
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
219,430
247,998
6.56
$
767,314
629,167
5.72
$
792,694
589,585
7.17
$
Silver production at Endeavor decreased as a result of the mine operator's decision to significantly curtail production due
to low lead and zinc prices. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased due to the impact of higher silver prices on the Company's
silver price sharing agreement with the Endeavor mine operator. Amortization was $1.1 million compared to $9.0 million due to
lower production and lower amortizable mineral interest.
2015 compared to 2014
Silver production increased due to higher grade, partially offset by lower throughput. Costs applicable to sales per ounce
decreased due to the impact of lower silver prices on the Company's silver price sharing agreement with the Endeavor mine
operator. Royalty revenue was $6.9 million compared to $3.2 million due to commencement of production from the Correnso
mine as well as higher production from the Cerro Bayo and El Gallo mines. Amortization was $9.0 million compared to $7.0
million due higher production.
46
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 was $125.8 million,
$113.5 million and $53.5 million, respectively, and was impacted by the following key factors:
Consolidated silver equivalent ounces sold
Average realized price per consolidated silver equivalent ounce(1)
Costs applicable to sales per consolidated silver equivalent ounce (1)
Operating margin per consolidated silver equivalent ounce
(1)
See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.
Year ended December 31,
2015
36,659,759
2016
34,632,666
2014
31,982,962
$
$
19.13
(11.83)
7.30
$
$
17.44
(13.08)
4.36
$
$
19.78
(14.94)
4.84
In thousands
Cash flow before changes in operating assets and liabilities
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables
Prepaid expenses and other
Inventories
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
$
$
2016
Year ended December 31,
2015
2014
164,154
$
70,019
$
31,046
9,011
(826)
(35,591)
(10,931)
125,817
$
17,560
(3,063)
19,573
9,453
113,542
$
(11,611)
5,635
12,971
15,507
53,548
Cash provided by operating activities increased $12.3 million in 2016 compared to 2015 due to higher average realized
prices and lower costs applicable to sales per consolidated silver equivalent ounce, partially offset by lower silver ounces sold and
unfavorable working capital adjustments. Metal sales for 2016 increased $23.3 million, $57.7 million due to higher average realized
prices partially offset by $34.4 million from lower silver equivalent ounces sold. The $38.3 million working capital increase in
2016 was primarily due to higher precious metals inventory and ore on leach pads, compared to the $43.5 million working capital
decrease in 2015 due to lower precious metals inventory and collection of accounts receivable.
Cash provided by operating activities increased $60.0 million in 2015 compared to 2014 due to higher silver equivalent
ounces sold and lower costs applicable to sales per silver equivalent ounce, partially offset by lower average realized prices. Metal
sales for 2015 increased by $92.4 million due to higher silver equivalent ounces sold, mostly offset by a $85.9 million reduction
due to lower average realized prices. The $43.5 million working capital decrease for 2015 was primarily due to a reduction of
metal inventory and collection of accounts receivable, compared to the $22.5 million working capital decrease for 2014, which
was primarily due to a reduction of inventory.
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities in 2016 was $83.4 million compared to $211.3 million in 2015, primarily due to
proceeds from the sales of non-core assets and the Wharf acquisition in 2015. The Company had capital expenditures of $101.0
million in 2016 compared with $95.2 million in 2015. Capital expenditures in both periods primarily related to underground
development at Palmarejo and Kensington.
Net cash used in investing activities in 2015 was $211.3 million compared to $81.7 million in 2014, primarily due to the
acquisition of the Wharf gold mine for $99.4 million and higher development capital expenditures in 2015, partially offset by
purchases of short-term investments in 2014. The Company spent $95.2 million on capital expenditures in 2015 compared with
$64.2 million in 2014. Capital expenditures in 2015 were primarily related to underground development of the Guadalupe and
Independencia deposits at Palmarejo, crusher expansion and Stage III buttress construction at Rochester, and underground
development of the Jualin deposit at Kensington, compared to underground development at Palmarejo and Kensington in 2014.
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities in 2016 was $80.2 million compared to a $29.0 million source in 2015. During 2016,
the Company voluntarily repaid the Term Loan for $103.4 million and redeemed $190 million aggregate principal amount of its
Senior Notes. The Company received net proceeds of $269.6 million from the sale of 26.9 million shares of its common stock in
connection with the $75.0 million and $200.0 million “at the market” stock offerings.
47
Net cash provided by financing activities in 2015 was $29.0 million compared to $93.0 million in 2014. During 2015, the
Company entered into a $50 million short-term loan which was subsequently repaid upon entering into the $100 million Term
Loan. In 2014, the Company completed a follow-on offering of $150 million of its Senior Notes.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations at December 31, 2016 and the effect such
obligations are expected to have on its liquidity and cash flow in future periods.
Contractual Obligations
Long-term debt obligations:
Senior Notes, net
Interest on debt
Capital lease obligations(1)
Operating lease obligations:
Hyak mining lease
Operating leases
Other long-term obligations:
Reclamation and mine closure(2)
Severance payments(3)
Unrecognized tax benefits(4)
Payments Due by Period
Total
Less Than
1 Year
1-3 Years
4-5 Years
More Than
5 Years
$
177,997
$
— $
— $
177,997
$
63,078
241,075
37,346
4,591
35,638
40,229
300,077
8,653
23,410
332,140
14,017
14,017
13,292
287
13,422
13,709
3,522
3,049
—
6,571
28,035
28,035
17,449
574
10,244
10,818
21,026
199,023
6,561
574
6,412
6,986
—
—
—
44
3,156
5,560
8,716
6,325
17,702
272,528
—
—
—
—
5,604
—
6,325
17,702
278,132
Total
$
650,790
$
47,589
$
62,627
$
230,272
$
286,892
(1) The Company has entered into various capital lease agreements for commitments primarily over the next two years.
(2) Reclamation and mine closure amounts represent the Company’s estimate of the cash flows associated with its legal obligation to reclaim mining
properties. This amount will decrease as reclamation work is completed. Amounts shown on the table are undiscounted.
(3) Accrued government-mandated severance at the Palmarejo complex and San Bartolomé mine.
(4) The Company is unable to reasonably estimate the timing of recognition of unrecognized tax benefits beyond 2016 due to uncertainties in the timing
of the effective settlement of tax positions.
Environmental Compliance Expenditures
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, the Company spent $6.9 million, $6.8 million, and $5.6 million,
respectively, in connection with routine environmental compliance activities at its operating properties. The Company estimates
that environmental compliance expenditures during 2017 will be approximately $7.8 million. Future environmental compliance
expenditures will be determined by governmental regulations and the overall scope of the Company’s operating and development
activities.
Other Liquidity Matters
The Company reduced debt by $279.5 million, or 57% during 2016. Together with higher adjusted EBITDA, the Company
continues to significantly reduce its financial leverage. We believe that our liquidity and capital resources from U.S. operations
are adequate to fund our U.S. operations and corporate activities.
The Company has asserted indefinite reinvestment of earnings from its Mexican operations as determined by
management’s judgment about and intentions concerning the future operations of the Company. The Company does not believe
that the amounts reinvested will have a material impact on liquidity.
In order to reduce future cash interest payments, and/or amounts due at maturity or upon redemption, from time to time
we may repurchase certain of our debt securities for cash or in exchange for other securities, which may include secured or
unsecured notes or equity, in each case in open market or privately negotiated transactions. We regularly engage in conversations
with our bondholders and evaluate any such transactions in light of prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual
48
restrictions, and other factors. The amounts involved may be significant and any such transactions may occur at a substantial
discount to the debt securities' face amount. For additional information, please see the section titled “Risk Factors” included
in Item 1A.
Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Developments
Listed below are the accounting policies that we believe are critical to our financial statements due to the degree of
uncertainty regarding the estimates and assumptions involved and the magnitude of the asset, liability, revenue, and expense being
reported. For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in
the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue includes sales value received for the Company’s principal products, silver and gold, and royalty revenues received.
Revenue is recognized when title to silver and gold passes to the buyer and when collectability is reasonably assured. Title passes
to the buyer based on terms of the sales contract. Product pricing is determined at the point revenue is recognized by reference to
active and freely traded commodity markets; for example, the London Bullion Market for both gold and silver.
Under the Company’s concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters, final gold and silver prices are set on a specified
future quotational period, typically one to three months, after the shipment date based on market prices. Revenues are recorded
under these contracts at the time title passes to the buyer based on the forward price for the expected settlement period. The
contracts, in general, provide for provisional payment based upon provisional assays and quoted metal prices. Final settlement is
based on the average applicable price for the specified future quotational period and generally occurs from three to six months
after shipment. Final sales are settled using smelter weights and settlement assays (average of assays exchanged and/or umpire
assay results) and are priced as specified in the smelter contract. The Company’s provisionally priced sales contracts contain an
embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the
receivable from the sale of concentrates at the forward price at the time of sale. The embedded derivative does not qualify for
hedge accounting and is adjusted to fair value through revenue each period until the date of final gold and silver settlement.
Estimates
The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of its financial statements, the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period, and
mined reserves. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates. There are a number of uncertainties
inherent in estimating quantities of reserves, including many factors beyond the Company’s control. Mineral reserve estimates are
based upon engineering evaluations of samplings of drill holes and other openings. These estimates involve assumptions regarding
future silver and gold prices, mine geology, mining methods and the related costs to develop and mine the reserves. Changes in
these assumptions could result in material adjustments to the Company’s reserve estimates. The Company uses reserve estimates
in determining the units-of-production amortization and evaluating mine assets for potential impairment.
Amortization
The Company amortizes its property, plant, and equipment, mining properties, and mine development using the units-
of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body based on its proven and probable reserves or the straight-line method
over the useful life, whichever is shorter. The accounting estimates related to amortization are critical accounting estimates because
(1) the determination of reserves involves uncertainties with respect to the ultimate geology of its reserves and the assumptions
used in determining the economic feasibility of mining those reserves and (2) changes in estimated proven and probable reserves
and asset useful lives can have a material impact on net income.
Write-downs
We review and evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Asset impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated undiscounted
pretax future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the
lowest level for which there is identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of future cash flows from other asset groups.
An impairment loss is measured by discounted estimated future cash flows, and recorded by reducing the asset's carrying amount
to fair value. Future cash flows are estimated based on estimated quantities of recoverable minerals, expected silver and gold prices
(considering current and historical prices, trends and related factors), production levels, operating costs, capital requirements and
reclamation costs, all based on life-of-mine plans. During 2016, 2015, and 2014, we recorded impairments of $4.4 million, $313.3
million, and $1,472.7 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of mining properties and property, plant and equipment
as part of Write-downs. See Note 4 -- Write-Downs for additional detail.
49
Existing proven and probable reserves and value beyond proven and probable reserves, including mineralization other
than proven and probable reserves, are included when determining the fair value of mine site asset groups at acquisition and,
subsequently, in determining whether the assets are impaired. The term “recoverable minerals” refers to the estimated amount of
silver and gold that will be obtained after taking into account losses during ore processing and treatment. Estimates of recoverable
minerals from exploration stage mineral interests are risk adjusted based on management’s relative confidence in such materials.
The ability to achieve the estimated quantities of recoverable minerals from exploration stage mineral interests involves further
risks in addition to those risk factors applicable to mineral interests where proven and probable reserves have been identified, due
to the lower level of confidence that the identified mineralized material could ultimately be mined economically. Assets classified
as exploration potential have the highest level of risk that the carrying value of the asset can be ultimately realized, due to the still
lower level of geological confidence and economic modeling.
Silver and gold prices are volatile and affected by many factors beyond the Company’s control, including prevailing
interest rates and returns on other asset classes, expectations regarding inflation, speculation, currency values, governmental
decisions regarding precious metals stockpiles, global and regional demand and production, political and economic conditions
and other factors may affect the key assumptions used in the Company’s impairment testing. Various factors could impact our
ability to achieve forecasted production levels from proven and probable reserves. Additionally, production, capital and reclamation
costs could differ from the assumptions used in the cash flow models used to assess impairment. Actual results may vary from
the Company’s estimates and result in additional Write-downs.
Ore on Leach Pads
The heap leach process is a process of extracting silver and gold by placing ore on an impermeable pad and applying a
diluted cyanide solution that dissolves a portion of the contained silver and gold, which are then recovered in metallurgical processes.
The Company uses several integrated steps to scientifically measure the metal content of ore placed on the leach pads.
As the ore body is drilled in preparation for the blasting process, samples are taken of the drill residue which are assayed to
determine estimated quantities of contained metal. The Company estimates the quantity of ore by utilizing global positioning
satellite survey techniques. The Company then processes the ore through crushing facilities where the output is again weighed and
sampled for assaying. A metallurgical reconciliation with the data collected from the mining operation is completed with appropriate
adjustments made to previous estimates. The crushed ore is then transported to the leach pad for application of the leaching solution.
As the leach solution is collected from the leach pads, it is continuously sampled for assaying. The quantity of leach solution is
measured by flow meters throughout the leaching and precipitation process. After precipitation, the product is converted to doré,
which is the final product produced by the mine. The inventory is stated at lower of cost or market, with cost being determined
using a weighted average cost method.
The historical cost of the metal that is expected to be extracted within twelve months is classified as current. Ore on leach
pad is valued based on actual production costs incurred to produce and place ore on the leach pads, less costs allocated to minerals
recovered through the leach process.
The estimate of both the ultimate recovery expected over time and the quantity of metal that may be extracted relative to
the time the leach process occurs requires the use of estimates and relies upon laboratory testwork. Testwork consists of 60 day
leach columns from which the Company projects metal recoveries up to five years in the future. The quantities of metal contained
in the ore are estimated based upon actual weights and assay analysis. The rate at which the leach process extracts gold and silver
from the crushed ore is based upon laboratory column tests and actual experience occurring over more than twenty years of leach
pad operations at the Rochester mine. The assumptions used by the Company to measure metal content during each stage of the
inventory conversion process includes estimated recovery rates based on laboratory testing and assaying. The Company periodically
reviews its estimates compared to actual experience and revises its estimates when appropriate. The ultimate recovery will not be
known until leaching operations cease. Historically, our operating results have not been materially impacted by variations between
the estimated and actual recoverable quantities of silver and gold on our leach pads.
Reclamation
The Company recognizes obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset
retirement costs. The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation will be recognized in the period in which it is incurred
if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the associated
asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. An accretion cost, representing the increase over
time in the present value of the liability, is recorded each period in Pre-development, Reclamation, and Other. As reclamation
work is performed or liabilities are otherwise settled, the recorded amount of the liability is reduced. Future remediation costs for
inactive mines are accrued based on management’s best estimate at the end of each period of the discounted costs expected to be
incurred at the site. Such cost estimates include, where applicable, ongoing care and maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes
in estimates are reflected in earnings in the period an estimate is revised.
50
Derivatives
The Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measures those instruments
at fair value. Changes in the value of derivative instruments are recorded each period in Fair value adjustments, net. Management
applies judgment in estimating the fair value of instruments that are highly sensitive to assumptions regarding commodity prices,
market volatilities, and foreign currency exchange rates.
Income and Mining Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the guidance of ASC 740. The Company’s annual tax rate
is based on income, statutory tax rates in effect and tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which
the Company operates. Significant judgment is required in determining the annual tax expense, current tax assets and liabilities,
deferred tax assets and liabilities, and our future taxable income, both as a whole and in various tax jurisdictions, for purposes of
assessing our ability to realize future benefit from our deferred tax assets. Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates
due to future changes in income tax law, significant changes in the jurisdictions in which we operate or unpredicted results from
the final determination of each year’s liability by taxing authorities.
The Company’s deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and such amounts measured by tax laws and regulations. In evaluating the realizability
of the deferred tax assets, management considers both positive and negative evidence that may exist, such as earnings history,
reversal of taxable temporary differences, forecasted operating earnings and available tax planning strategies in each tax jurisdiction.
A valuation allowance may be established to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is considered more likely than not
to be realized through the generation of future taxable income and other tax planning strategies.
The Company has asserted indefinite reinvestment of earnings from its Mexican operations as determined by
management’s judgment about and intentions concerning the future operations of the Company. For the years 2016 and 2015, the
Company had no unremitted earnings from these specific foreign operations. As a result, the Company does not record a U.S.
deferred tax liability for the foreign earnings that meet the indefinite reversal criteria. Refer to Note 9 -- Income and Mining Taxes
for further discussion on our assertion.
The Company’s operations may involve dealing with uncertainties and judgments in the application of complex tax
regulations in multiple jurisdictions. The final taxes paid are dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing
authorities in various jurisdictions and resolution of disputes arising from federal, state, and international tax audits. The Company
recognizes potential liabilities and records tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions
based on its estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. The Company adjusts these reserves in light
of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit; however, due to the complexity of some of these
uncertainties, the ultimate resolution could result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax
liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period which they are determined.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
51
Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures
Non-GAAP financial measures are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standard meaning
prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Adjusted Net Income (Loss)
Management uses Adjusted net income (loss) to evaluate the Company's operating performance, and to plan and forecast
its operations. The Company believes the use of Adjusted net income (loss) reflects the underlying operating performance of our
core mining business and allows investors and analysts to compare results of the Company to similar results of other mining
companies. Management's determination of the components of Adjusted net income (loss) are evaluated periodically and are based,
in part, on a review of non-GAAP financial measures used by mining industry analysts. The tax effect of adjustments are based
on statutory tax rates and the Company's tax attributes, including the impact through the Company's valuation allowance. The
combined effective rate of tax adjustments may not be consistent with the statutory tax rates or the Company's effective tax rate
due to jurisdictional tax attributes and related valuation allowance impacts which may minimize the tax effect of certain adjustments
and may not apply to gains and losses equally. Adjusted net income (loss) is reconciled to Net income (loss) in the table below:
Year ended December 31,
In thousands except per share amounts
Net income (loss)
Fair value adjustments
Impairment of marketable securities
Write-downs
Inventory adjustment
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and securities
(Gain) loss on debt extinguishments
Loss on Revolving Credit Facility termination
Corporate reorganization costs
Transaction costs
Deferred tax on reorganization
Foreign exchange (gain) loss
Tax effect of adjustments(1)
Adjusted net income (loss)
Adjusted net income (loss) per share - Basic
Adjusted net income (loss) per share - Diluted
2016
$
55,352
$
11,581
703
4,446
3,689
(11,334)
21,365
—
—
1,199
(40,767)
(1,034)
2,583
47,783
0.30
0.29
$
$
$
$
$
$
2014
2015
(367,183) $ (1,186,874)
(3,618)
6,593
(5,202)
2,346
313,337
1,472,721
—
352
(15,916)
—
647
2,112
—
1,599
(35,734)
(103,642) $
—
530
—
3,035
—
—
—
(16,159)
(451,670)
(175,442)
(0.80) $
(0.80) $
(1.71)
(1.71)
(1) For the year ended December 31, 2016, tax effect of adjustments of $2.6 million (8%) is primarily related to a taxable gain on the sale of assets and
the tax valuation allowance impact from an asset write-down, partially offset by tax benefit from fair value adjustments.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, tax effect of adjustments of $(35.7) million (-12%) is primarily related to the tax benefit from write-downs of
the Palmarejo complex, San Bartolomé, and Coeur Capital.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, tax effect of adjustments of $(451.7) million (-30%) is primarily related to the tax benefit from write-downs
of the Palmarejo complex and La Preciosa Project.
52 EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
Management uses EBITDA to evaluate the Company's operating performance, to plan and forecast its operations, and assess
leverage levels and liquidity measures. The Company believes the use of EBITDA reflects the underlying operating performance
of our core mining business and allows investors and analysts to compare results of the Company to similar results of other mining
companies. Adjusted EBITDA is a measure used in the Company's Senior Notes indenture to determine our ability to make certain
payments and incur additional indebtedness. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent, and should not be considered an
alternative to, Net income (Loss) or Cash Flow from Operations as determined under GAAP. Other companies may calculate
Adjusted EBITDA differently and those calculations may not be comparable to our presentation. Adjusted EBITDA is reconciled
to Net income (loss) in the table below:
Year ended December 31,
In thousands except per share amounts
Net income (loss)
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
Income tax provision (benefit)
Amortization
EBITDA
Fair value adjustments, net
Impairment of equity securities
Foreign exchange losses
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and securities
(Gain) loss on debt extinguishment
Corporate reorganization costs
Transaction costs
Asset retirement obligation accretion
Inventory adjustments and write-downs
Write-downs
Adjusted EBITDA
2016
$
55,352
$
36,920
(54,239)
123,161
161,194
11,581
703
10,720
(11,334)
21,365
—
1,199
8,369
6,917
4,446
2014
45,703
(26,263)
143,751
(203,992)
(5,202)
2,346
2015
(367,183) $ (1,186,874)
47,546
(428,254)
162,436
(1,405,146)
(3,618)
6,593
(470)
530
15,769
352
(15,916)
647
2,112
8,191
10,207
313,337
—
—
—
5,568
15,823
1,472,721
$
215,160
$
127,851
$
92,001
Costs Applicable to Sales and All-in Sustaining Costs
Management uses Costs applicable to sales (“CAS”) and All-in sustaining costs (“AISC”) to evaluate the Company’s
current operating performance and life of mine performance from discovery through reclamation. We believe these measures
assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders in understanding the costs associated with producing silver and gold, assessing
our operating performance and ability to generate free cash flow from operations and sustaining production. These measures may
not be indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. Management believes converting
the benefit from selling gold into silver equivalent ounces best allows management, analysts, investors and other stakeholders to
evaluate the operating performance of the Company. At December 31, 2016, the Company adjusted its realized silver equivalent
ounce calculation to reflect average spot metal prices, rather than using the Company's average realized metal prices to enhance
comparability among our peers. Other companies may calculate CAS and AISC differently as a result of reflecting the benefit
from selling non-silver metals as a by-product credit rather than converting to silver equivalent ounces, differences in the
determination of sustaining capital expenditures, and differences in underlying accounting principles and accounting frameworks
such as in International Financial Reporting Standards.
53
Year Ended December 31, 2016
In thousands except per ounce
amounts
Costs applicable to sales, including
amortization (U.S. GAAP)
Amortization
Palmarejo
Rochester
$
117,419
$
111,564
36,599
21,838
Costs applicable to sales
$
80,820
$
89,726
Silver
San
Bartolomé
Endeavor
Total
Kensington
Wharf
Total
Total
Gold
$
$
80,799
6,633
74,166
$
$
2,363
$
312,145
644
65,714
1,719
$
246,431
$
$
131,518
34,787
96,731
$
$
87,000
$
218,518
$ 530,663
20,621
55,408
121,122
66,379
$
163,110
$ 409,541
Silver equivalent ounces sold
7,538,311
7,542,740
5,411,057
262,078
20,754,186
Gold equivalent ounces sold
Costs applicable to sales per ounce
Costs applicable to sales per average
spot ounce
$
$
10.72
9.73
$
$
11.90
$
13.71
$
6.56
10.97
$
$
121,688
109,620
231,308
11.87
$
795
$
606
$
705
11.12
Costs applicable to sales
Treatment and refining costs
Sustaining capital(1)
General and administrative
Exploration
Reclamation
Project/pre-development costs
All-in sustaining costs
Silver equivalent ounces sold
Kensington and Wharf silver equivalent ounces sold
Consolidated silver equivalent ounces sold
All-in sustaining costs per silver equivalent ounce
All-in sustaining costs per average spot silver equivalent ounce
(1)
Excludes development capital for Jualin, Independencia, Guadalupe South Portal and Rochester expansion permitting.
34,632,666
$
$
11.83
10.50
$ 409,541
4,307
77,841
29,376
12,930
15,504
7,481
$ 556,980
20,754,186
13,878,480
34,632,666
$
$
16.08
14.27
Year Ended December 31, 2015
In thousands except per ounce
amounts
Costs applicable to sales, including
amortization (U.S. GAAP)
Amortization
Palmarejo
Rochester
$
170,899
$
127,900
32,423
23,906
Costs applicable to sales
$
138,476
$
103,994
Silver
San
Bartolomé
Endeavor
Total
Kensington Wharf
Total
Total
Gold
$
$
93,625
17,798
75,827
$
$
9,059
$
401,483
5,539
79,666
3,520
$
321,817
$
$
147,880
$ 68,575
$
216,455
42,240
16,378
58,618
105,640
$ 52,197
$
157,837
Silver equivalent ounces sold
9,840,705
8,377,823
5,495,369
615,022
24,328,919
Gold equivalent ounces sold
Costs applicable to sales per ounce
Costs applicable to sales per average
spot ounce
$
$
14.07
12.75
$
$
12.41
$
13.80
$
5.72
11.32
$
$
131,553
73,961
205,514
13.23
$
803
$
706
$
768
12.31
Costs applicable to sales
Treatment and refining costs
Sustaining capital(1)
General and administrative
Exploration
Reclamation
Project/pre-development costs
All-in sustaining costs
Silver equivalent ounces sold
Kensington and Wharf silver equivalent ounces sold
Consolidated silver equivalent ounces sold
All-in sustaining costs per silver equivalent ounce
All-in sustaining costs per average spot silver equivalent ounce
(1) Excludes development capital for Jualin, Guadalupe, Independencia and Rochester crushing capacity expansion.
$
$
$
$
$
617,938
138,284
479,654
36,659,759
13.08
11.60
479,654
4,801
53,362
32,834
11,647
16,769
5,674
$
604,741
24,328,919
12,330,840
36,659,759
16.50
14.62
$
$
54 Year Ended December 31, 2014
In thousands except per ounce amounts
Palmarejo
Rochester
Silver
San
Bartolomé
Endeavor
Total
Kensington
Total
Gold
Costs applicable to sales, including
amortization (U.S. GAAP)
Amortization
Costs applicable to sales
Silver equivalent ounces sold
Gold equivalent ounces sold
Costs applicable to sales per ounce
Costs applicable to sales per average spot
ounce
$
$
$
$
256,707
69,431
187,276
12,161,719
15.40
14.69
$
$
$
$
112,252
20,790
91,462
$
$
109,082
19,423
89,659
$
$
8,514
4,308
4,206
6,309,912
6,275,769
586,242
14.49
$
14.29
$
7.17
13.94
Costs applicable to sales
Treatment and refining costs
Sustaining capital(1)
General and administrative
Exploration
Reclamation
Project/pre-development costs
All-in sustaining costs
Silver equivalent ounces sold
Kensington silver equivalent ounces sold
Consolidated silver equivalent ounces sold
All-in sustaining costs per silver equivalent ounce
All-in sustaining costs per average spot silver equivalent ounce
$
$
$
$
486,555
113,952
372,603
$
$
25,333,642
14.71
$
14.24
148,961
43,619
105,342
110,822
951
$
$
$
$
$
635,516
157,571
477,945
31,982,962
14.94
14.26
477,945
4,943
61,199
40,845
21,740
7,468
16,588
$
630,728
25,333,642
6,649,320
31,982,962
19.72
18.81
$
$
(1) Excludes development capital for Guadalupe, Independencia and Rochester crushing capacity expansion and miscellaneous land purchases.
Reconciliation of All-in Sustaining Costs per Silver Equivalent Ounce for 2017 Guidance
In thousands except per ounce
amounts
Costs applicable to sales,
including amortization (U.S.
GAAP)
Amortization
Costs applicable to sales
$
$
Silver
Gold
Palmarejo
Rochester
San Bartolomé
Endeavor Total Silver Kensington Wharf
Total Gold
211,000 $
108,380 $
102,000 $
3,750 $
425,130 $
130,500 $
83,800 $
214,300 $
69,200
19,860
18,500
—
107,560
29,100
11,500
40,600
141,800 $
88,520 $
83,500 $
3,750 $
317,570 $
101,400 $
72,300 $
173,700 $
Silver equivalent ounces sold
14,000,000
7,680,000
5,900,000
380,000
27,960,000
Total
Combined
639,430
148,160
491,270
40,800,000
Gold equivalent ounces sold
Costs applicable to sales per
ounce guidance
Costs applicable to sales
Treatment and refining costs
$10.00 - $10.50 $11.50 - $12.00
$14.00 - $14.50
$800 - $850
$775 - $825
124,000
90,000
214,000
Sustaining capital, including capital lease payments
General and administrative
Exploration
Reclamation
Project/pre-development costs
All-in sustaining costs
Silver equivalent ounces sold
Kensington and Wharf silver equivalent ounces sold
Consolidated silver equivalent ounces sold
All-in sustaining costs per silver equivalent ounce guidance
$
491,270
4,300
88,000
30,000
24,000
14,000
5,700
$
657,270
27,960,000
12,840,000
40,800,000
$15.75 - $16.25
55 Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is exposed to various market risks as a part of its operations and engages in risk management strategies
to mitigate these risks. The Company continually evaluates the potential benefits of engaging in these strategies based on current
market conditions. The Company does not actively engage in the practice of trading derivative instruments for profit. Additional
information about the Company’s derivative financial instruments may be found in Note 12 -- Derivative Financial Instruments
in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. This discussion of the Company's market risk assessments contains “forward
looking statements”. For additional information regarding forward-looking statements and risks and uncertainties that could
impact the Company, please refer to Item 2 of this Report - Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements. Actual
results and actions could differ materially from those discussed below.
Gold and Silver Price
Gold and silver prices may fluctuate widely due to numerous factors such as U.S. dollar strength or weakness, demand,
investor sentiment, inflation or deflation, and global mine production. The Company's profitability and cash flow may be
significantly impacted by changes in the market price of gold and silver.
Gold and Silver Hedging
To mitigate the risks associated with gold and silver price fluctuations, the Company may enter into option contracts to
hedge future production.
If the market price of silver were to average less than the high strike price but more than the low strike price during the
contract period, the Company would receive the difference between the average market price and the high strike price for the
contracted volume over the contract period. If the market price of silver were to average less than the low strike price during the
contract period, the Company would receive the difference between the average market price and the high strike price for the
contracted volume over the contract period, and the Company would be required to pay the difference between the average market
price and the low strike price for the contracted volume over the contract period. The Company may be exposed to non-performance
risk by counterparties as a result of its hedging activities. This exposure would be limited to the amount that the spot price of the
metal falls short of the contract price. The Company had no outstanding gold and silver hedging contracts at December 31, 2016.
Provisional Silver and Gold Sales
The Company enters into sales contracts with third-party smelters and refiners which, in some cases, provide for a
provisional payment based upon preliminary assays and quoted metal prices. The provisionally priced sales contracts contain an
embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract. Depending on the difference between the price at the
time of sale and the final settlement price, embedded derivatives are recorded as either a derivative asset or liability. The embedded
derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and, as a result, are marked to the market gold and silver price at the end of each
period from the provisional sale date to the date of final settlement. The mark-to-market gains and losses are recorded in earnings.
Changes in silver and gold pricing resulted in provisional pricing mark-to-market losses of $0.3 million in the year ended December
31, 2016.
At December 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding provisionally priced sales of 0.4 million ounces of silver and 25,505
ounces of gold at prices of $16.35 and $1,208, respectively. A 10% change in realized silver price would cause revenue to vary
by $0.6 million and a 10% change in realized gold price would cause revenue to vary by $3.1 million.
Palmarejo Gold Production Royalty
In 2009, Coeur Mexicana entered into a gold production royalty transaction with a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada
Corporation. The royalty covered 50% of the life of mine production from the Palmarejo mine and adjacent properties and included
a minimum obligation of 4,167 gold ounces per month which terminated in July 2016 upon delivery of 400,000 gold ounces. The
minimum royalty obligation was considered an embedded derivative financial instrument due to the impact of fluctuating gold
prices on the underlying gold ounces.
56
Foreign Currency
The Company operates, or has mineral interests, in several foreign countries including Australia, Bolivia, Chile, Mexico,
Argentina, Ecuador, and New Zealand, which exposes it to foreign currency exchange rate risks. Foreign currency exchange rates
are influenced by world market factors beyond the Company's control such as supply and demand for U.S. and foreign currencies
and related monetary and fiscal policies. Fluctuations in local currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar may significantly
impact profitability and cash flow.
Foreign Exchange Hedging
To manage foreign currency risk, the Company may enter into forward foreign exchange contracts and option contracts
when the Company believes such contracts would be beneficial. The Company had no outstanding foreign exchange contracts at
December 31, 2016.
57
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
PART II
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Coeur Mining, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Coeur Mining, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and
subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive
income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Coeur Mining, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established
in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 10, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 8, 2017
58
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Coeur Mining, Inc.
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Coeur Mining, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the
“Company”) as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in
the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2016, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and our report dated February
8, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 8, 2017
59 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm1
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Coeur Mining, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Coeur Mining, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2015. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Coeur Mining, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 10, 2016
1. Coeur filed Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the(cid:3) (cid:5)(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:5)(cid:12)(cid:3) (cid:82)(cid:81)
February 10, 2017 to amend Coeur's Annual Report on 10-K filed with the Commission on February 9, 2017 for the sole purpose
of amending the report prepared by KPMG LLP (the "Audit Report") contained in Item 8 of the Form 10-K to correct a
typographical error in the date of the Audit Report from February 8, 2017 to February 10, 2016.
60 COEUR MINING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
Notes
In thousands, except share data
Revenue
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Costs applicable to sales(1)
Amortization
General and administrative
Exploration
Write-downs
Pre-development, reclamation, and other
Total costs and expenses
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment
Fair value adjustments, net
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
Other, net
Total other income (expense), net
Income (loss) before income and mining taxes
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit
NET INCOME (LOSS)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) on equity securities, net of tax of $(767) and
$1,446 for the years ended December 31, 2016, and 2014, respectively
Reclassification adjustments for impairment of equity securities, net of
tax of $(2,552) for the year ended December 31, 2014
Reclassification adjustments for realized (gain) loss on sale of equity
securities, net of tax of $(219) for the year ended December 31, 2014
Other comprehensive income (loss)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic
Diluted
(1) Excludes amortization.
3
3
11
19
8
9
10
$
665,777
$
646,086
$
635,742
409,541
123,161
29,376
12,930
4,446
17,219
596,673
(21,365)
(11,581)
(36,920)
1,875
(67,991)
1,113
54,239
$
55,352
$
479,654
143,751
32,834
11,647
313,337
17,793
999,016
477,945
162,436
40,845
21,740
1,472,721
26,037
2,201,724
15,916
5,202
(45,703)
(15,931)
(40,516)
(393,446)
26,263
—
3,618
(47,546)
(5,218)
(49,146)
(1,615,128)
428,254
(367,183) $ (1,186,874)
3,222
(4,154)
(2,290)
703
2,346
(2,691)
1,234
56,586
$
894
(914)
2,098
(368,097) $ (1,184,776)
4,042
346
0.35
0.34
$
$
(2.83) $
(11.59)
(2.83) $
(11.59)
$
$
$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
61
COEUR MINING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)
Adjustments:
Amortization
Accretion
Deferred income taxes
Loss on termination of revolving credit facility
(Gain) Loss on extinguishment of debt
Fair value adjustments, net
Stock-based compensation
Impairment of equity securities
Write-downs
Other
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Inventory and ore on leach pads
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures
Acquisitions, net
Proceeds from the sale of assets
Purchase of investments
Sales and maturities of investments
Other
CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock
Issuance of notes and bank borrowings
Payments on debt, capital leases, and associated costs
Gold production royalty payments
Other
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
Notes
In thousands
$
55,352
(367,183)
(1,186,874)
11
6
14
4
13
19
123,161
10,248
(71,350)
—
21,365
11,581
9,715
703
4,446
(1,067)
9,011
(826)
(35,591)
(10,931)
125,817
(101,013)
(1,417)
16,296
(178)
7,077
(4,208)
(83,443)
269,556
—
(322,801)
(27,155)
172
(80,228)
(678)
(38,532)
200,714
162,182
$
143,751
14,149
(40,838)
—
(15,916)
(5,202)
9,272
2,346
313,337
16,303
17,560
(3,063)
19,573
9,453
113,542
(95,193)
(110,846)
607
(1,880)
605
(4,586)
(211,293)
—
153,500
(84,715)
(39,235)
(542)
29,008
(1,404)
(70,147)
270,861
200,714
$
162,436
16,246
(448,905)
3,035
—
(3,618)
9,288
6,593
1,472,721
124
(11,611)
5,635
12,971
15,507
53,548
(64,244)
(21,329)
329
(50,513)
54,344
(321)
(81,734)
—
167,784
(25,902)
(48,395)
(509)
92,978
(621)
64,171
206,690
270,861
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
62
COEUR MINING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
Notes
In thousands, except share data
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables
Inventory
Ore on leach pads
Prepaid expenses and other
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment, net
Mining properties, net
Ore on leach pads
Restricted assets
Equity securities
Receivables
Deferred tax assets
Other
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities and other
Debt
Royalty obligations
Reclamation
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Debt
Royalty obligations
Reclamation
Deferred tax liabilities
Other long-term liabilities
$
$
$
15
16
16
17
18
16
14
15
19
11
5
19
11
5
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized 300,000,000 shares, issued
and outstanding 180,933,287 at December 31, 2016 and 151,339,136 at
December 31, 2015
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Accumulated deficit
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
$
$
$
$
162,182
60,431
106,026
64,167
17,981
410,787
216,796
558,455
67,231
17,597
4,488
30,951
191
12,413
1,318,909
53,335
42,743
12,039
4,995
3,522
116,634
198,857
4,292
95,804
74,798
60,037
433,788
200,714
85,992
81,711
67,329
10,942
446,688
195,999
589,219
44,582
11,633
2,766
24,768
1,942
14,892
1,332,489
52,153
50,532
10,431
24,893
2,071
140,080
479,979
4,864
83,197
147,132
55,761
770,933
1,809
3,314,590
(2,488)
(2,545,424)
768,487
1,318,909
$
1,513
3,024,461
(3,722)
(2,600,776)
421,476
1,332,489
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
63 COEUR MINING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
In thousands
Common
Stock
Shares
Common
Stock Par
Value
Additional
Paid-In Capital
Accumulated
Deficit
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Balances at December 31, 2013
102,843
$
1,028
$ 2,781,164
$ (1,046,719) $
(4,906) $ 1,730,567
Net income (loss)
Other comprehensive income
Common stock issued under long-term
incentive plans, net
—
—
541
—
—
6
—
—
8,531
(1,186,874)
—
(1,186,874)
—
—
2,098
—
2,098
8,537
Balances at December 31, 2014
103,384
$
1,034
$ 2,789,695
$ (2,233,593) $
(2,808) $
554,328
Net income (loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Common stock issued for the acquisition of
Paramount Gold and Silver Corp.
Common stock issued for the extinguishment
of Senior Notes
Common stock issued under stock-based
compensation plans, net
—
—
32,667
14,365
923
—
—
327
144
8
—
—
188,490
38,379
7,897
(367,183)
—
—
—
—
—
(914)
—
—
—
(367,183)
(914)
188,817
38,523
7,905
Balances at December 31, 2015
151,339
$
1,513
$ 3,024,461
$ (2,600,776) $
(3,722) $
421,476
Net income (loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Common stock issued for the extinguishment
of Senior Notes
Issuance of common stock
Common stock issued under stock-based
compensation plans, net
—
—
739
26,944
1,911
—
—
7
270
19
—
—
11,806
269,286
9,037
55,352
—
—
—
—
—
1,234
—
—
—
55,352
1,234
11,813
269,556
9,056
Balances at December 31, 2016
180,933
$
1,809
$ 3,314,590
$ (2,545,424) $
(2,488) $
768,487
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
64 Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 - THE COMPANY
Coeur Mining, Inc. (“Coeur” or “the Company”) is a gold and silver producer with mines located in the United States,
Mexico, and Bolivia and exploration projects in Mexico and Argentina. The Company operates the Palmarejo complex, Kensington,
Rochester, Wharf, and San Bartolomé mines, and owns Coeur Capital, which is primarily comprised of the Endeavor silver stream.
The cash flow and profitability of the Company's operations are significantly impacted by the market price of gold and silver. The
prices of gold and silver are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company's control.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. The preparation of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements requires the Company to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate to metal prices
and mineral reserves that are the basis for future cash flow estimates utilized in impairment calculations and units-of production
amortization calculations, environmental, reclamation and closure obligations, estimates of recoverable silver and gold in leach
pad inventories, estimates of fair value for certain reporting units and asset impairments, valuation allowances for deferred tax
assets, and the fair value and accounting treatment of financial instruments, equity securities, and derivative instruments. The
Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results will differ from the amounts estimated in these financial statements.
Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, the most significant of
which are Coeur Mexicana S.A. de C.V., Coeur Rochester, Inc., Coeur Alaska, Inc., Wharf Resources (U.S.A.), Empresa Minera
Manquiri S.A., and Coeur Capital, Inc. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The Company's
investments in entities in which it has less than 20% ownership interest are accounted for using the cost method.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include all highly-liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. The
Company minimizes its credit risk by investing its cash and cash equivalents with major U.S. and international banks and financial
institutions located principally in the United States with a minimum credit rating of A1, as defined by Standard & Poor’s. The
Company’s management believes that no concentration of credit risk exists with respect to the investment of its cash and cash
equivalents.
Receivables
Trade receivables and other receivable balances are reported at outstanding principal amounts, net of an allowance for
doubtful accounts, if deemed necessary. Management evaluates the collectability of receivable account balances to determine the
allowance, if any. Management considers the other party's credit risk and financial condition, as well as current and projected
economic and market conditions, in determining the amount of the allowance. Receivable balances are written off when management
determines that the balance is uncollectible.
Ore on Leach Pads
The heap leach process extracts silver and gold by placing ore on an impermeable pad and applying a diluted cyanide
solution that dissolves a portion of the contained silver and gold, which are then recovered in metallurgical processes.
The Company uses several integrated steps to scientifically measure the metal content of ore placed on the leach pads.
As the ore body is drilled in preparation for the blasting process, samples are taken of the drill residue which are assayed to
determine estimated quantities of contained metal. The Company estimates the quantity of ore by utilizing global positioning
satellite survey techniques. The Company then processes the ore through crushing facilities where the output is again weighed
and sampled for assaying. A metallurgical reconciliation with the data collected from the mining operation is completed with
appropriate adjustments made to previous estimates. The crushed ore is then transported to the leach pad for application of the
leaching solution. As the leach solution is collected from the leach pads, it is continuously sampled for assaying. The quantity of
leach solution is measured by flow meters throughout the leaching and precipitation process. After precipitation, the product is
converted to doré at the Rochester mine and a form of gold concentrate at the Wharf mine, representing the final product produced
by each mine. The inventory is stated at lower of cost or market, with cost being determined using a weighted average cost method.
65
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The historical cost of metal expected to be extracted within twelve months is classified as current and the historical cost
of metals contained within the broken ore expected to be extracted beyond twelve months is classified as non-current. Ore on
leach pads is valued based on actual production costs incurred to produce and place ore on the leach pad, less costs allocated to
minerals recovered through the leach process.
The estimate of both the ultimate recovery expected over time and the quantity of metal that may be extracted relative
to the time the leach process occurs requires the use of estimates, which are inherently inaccurate due to the nature of the leaching
process. The quantities of metal contained in the ore are based upon actual weights and assay analysis. The rate at which the leach
process extracts gold and silver from the crushed ore is based upon laboratory testing and actual experience of more than twenty
years of leach pad operations at the Rochester mine and thirty years of leach pad operations at the Wharf mine. The assumptions
used by the Company to measure metal content during each stage of the inventory conversion process includes estimated recovery
rates based on laboratory testing and assaying. The Company periodically reviews its estimates compared to actual experience
and revises its estimates when appropriate. Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions
and estimates that do not result in write-downs to net realizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis.
Metal and Other Inventory
Inventories include concentrate, doré, and operating materials and supplies. The classification of inventory is determined
by the stage at which the ore is in the production process. All inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being
determined using a weighted average cost method. Concentrate and doré inventory includes product at the mine site and product
held by refineries. Metal inventory costs include direct labor, materials, depreciation, depletion and amortization as well as overhead
costs relating to mining activities.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Expenditures for new facilities, assets acquired pursuant to capital leases, new assets or expenditures that extend the
useful lives of existing facilities are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method at rates sufficient to depreciate such
costs over the shorter of estimated productive lives of such facilities, lease term, or the useful life of the individual assets. Productive
lives range from 7 to 30 years for buildings and improvements and 3 to 10 years for machinery and equipment. Certain mining
equipment is depreciated using the units-of-production method based upon estimated total proven and probable reserves.
Mining Properties and Mine Development
Capitalization of mine development costs begins once all operating permits have been secured, mineralization is classified
as proven and probable reserves and a final feasibility study has been completed. Mine development costs include engineering
and metallurgical studies, drilling and other related costs to delineate an ore body, the removal of overburden to initially expose
an ore body at open pit surface mines and the building of access ways, shafts, lateral access, drifts, ramps and other infrastructure
at underground mines. Costs incurred before mineralization are classified as proven and probable reserves are expensed and
classified as exploration or pre-development expense. Mine development costs are amortized using the units of production method
over the estimated life of the ore body based on recoverable ounces to be mined from proven and probable reserves. Interest
expense allocable to the cost of developing mining properties and to construct new facilities is capitalized until assets are ready
for their intended use.
Drilling and related costs incurred at the Company’s operating mines are expensed as incurred in Exploration, unless the
Company can conclude with a high degree of confidence, prior to the commencement of a drilling program, that the drilling costs
will result in the conversion of a mineral resource into proven and probable reserves. The Company’s assessment is based on the
following factors: results from previous drill programs; results from geological models; results from a mine scoping study
confirming economic viability of the resource; and preliminary estimates of mine inventory, ore grade, cash flow and mine life.
In addition, the Company must have all permitting and/or contractual requirements necessary to have the right to and/or control
of the future benefit from the targeted ore body. The costs of a drilling program that meet these criteria are capitalized as mine
development costs. Drilling and related costs of approximately $12.9 million and $6.0 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively, were capitalized.
The cost of removing overburden and waste materials to access the ore body at an open pit mine prior to the production
phase are referred to as “pre-stripping costs.” Pre-stripping costs are capitalized during the development of an open pit mine.
Stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a mine are variable production costs that are included as a component of
inventory to be recognized in Costs applicable to sales in the same period as the revenue from the sale of inventory.
Mineral Interests
Significant payments related to the acquisition of land and mineral rights are capitalized. Prior to acquiring such land or
mineral rights, the Company generally makes a preliminary evaluation to determine that the property has significant potential to
develop an economic ore body. The time between initial acquisition and full evaluation of a property’s potential is variable and is
determined by many factors including: location relative to existing infrastructure, the property’s stage of development, geological
66
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
controls and metal prices. If a mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are amortized when production begins using the units
of- production method based on recoverable ounces to be mined from proven and probable reserves. If no mineable ore body is
discovered, such costs are expensed in the period in which it is determined the property has no future economic value.
Write-downs
We review and evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Asset impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated undiscounted
pretax future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the
lowest level for which there is identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of future cash flows from other asset groups.
An impairment loss is measured by discounted estimated future cash flows, and recorded by reducing the asset's carrying amount
to fair value. Future cash flows are estimated based on estimated quantities of recoverable minerals, expected silver and gold
prices (considering current and historical prices, trends and related factors), production levels, operating costs, capital requirements
and reclamation costs, all based on life-of-mine plans. During 2016, 2015, and 2014, we recorded impairments of $4.4 million,
$313.3 million, and $1,472.7 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of mining properties and property, plant and
equipment as part of Write-downs.
Existing proven and probable reserves and value beyond proven and probable reserves, including mineralization other
than proven and probable reserves are included when determining the fair value of mine site asset groups at acquisition and,
subsequently, in determining whether the assets are impaired. The term “recoverable minerals” refers to the estimated amount of
silver and gold that will be obtained after taking into account losses during ore processing and treatment. Estimates of recoverable
minerals from exploration stage mineral interests are risk adjusted based on management’s relative confidence in such materials.
The ability to achieve the estimated quantities of recoverable minerals from exploration stage mineral interests involves further
risks in addition to those risk factors applicable to mineral interests where proven and probable reserves have been identified, due
to the lower level of confidence that the identified mineralized material could ultimately be mined economically. Assets classified
as exploration potential have the highest level of risk that the carrying value of the asset can be ultimately realized, due to the still
lower level of geological confidence and economic modeling.
Silver and gold prices are volatile and affected by many factors beyond the Company’s control, including prevailing
interest rates and returns on other asset classes, expectations regarding inflation, speculation, currency values, governmental
decisions regarding precious metals stockpiles, global and regional demand and production, political and economic conditions
and other factors may affect the key assumptions used in the Company’s impairment testing. Various factors could impact our
ability to achieve forecasted production levels from proven and probable reserves. Additionally, production, capital and reclamation
costs could differ from the assumptions used in the cash flow models used to assess impairment. Actual results may vary from the
Company’s estimates and result in additional Write-downs.
Restricted Assets
The Company, under the terms of its self-insurance and bonding agreements with certain banks, lending institutions and
regulatory agencies, is required to collateralize certain portions of its obligations. The Company has collateralized these obligations
by assigning certificates of deposit that have maturity dates ranging from three months to a year, to the respective institutions or
agencies. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company held certificates of deposit and cash under these agreements of $17.6
million and $11.6 million, respectively. The ultimate timing of the release of the collateralized amounts is dependent on the timing
and closure of each mine and repayment of the facility. In order to release the collateral, the Company must seek approval from
certain government agencies responsible for monitoring the mine closure status. Collateral could also be released to the extent the
Company is able to secure alternative financial assurance satisfactory to the regulatory agencies. The Company believes there is
a reasonable probability that the collateral will remain in place beyond a twelve-month period and has therefore classified these
investments as long-term.
Reclamation
The Company recognizes obligations for the expected future retirement of tangible long-lived assets and other associated
asset retirement costs. The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation will be recognized in the period in which it is
incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the
associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. An accretion cost, representing the
increase over time in the present value of the liability, is recorded each period in Pre-development, reclamation, and other. As
reclamation work is performed or liabilities are otherwise settled, the recorded amount of the liability is reduced. Future remediation
costs for inactive mines are accrued based on management’s best estimate at the end of each period of the discounted costs expected
to be incurred at the site. Such cost estimates include, where applicable, ongoing care and maintenance and monitoring costs.
Changes in estimates are reflected prospectively in the period an estimate is revised.
67
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized, net of treatment and refining charges, when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery
has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, no obligations remain, and collection is probable.
Under the Company’s concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters, gold and silver prices are set on a specified
future quotational period, typically one to three months, after the shipment date based on market prices. Revenue and Costs
Applicable to Sales are recorded on a gross basis under these contracts at the time title passes to the buyer based on the forward
price for the expected settlement period. The contracts, in general, provide for provisional payment based upon provisional assays
and forward metal prices. Final settlement is based on the average applicable price for the specified future quotational period and
generally occurs from three to six months after shipment. The Company’s provisionally priced sales contain an embedded derivative
that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale
of concentrates measured at the forward price at the time of sale. The embedded derivative does not qualify for hedge accounting
and is adjusted to fair value through revenue each period until the date of final gold and silver settlement.
Foreign Currency
The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using U.S. dollars as their functional
currency. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for the period. Foreign currency gains and losses are
included in the determination of net income or loss.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measures those instruments at
fair value. Changes in the value of derivative instruments are recorded each period in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income (Loss) in Fair value adjustments, net. Management applies judgment in estimating the fair value of instruments that are
highly sensitive to assumptions regarding commodity prices, market volatilities, and foreign currency exchange rates.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and stock appreciation
rights (“SARs”) awards using market comparison. Stock options granted are accounted for as equity-based awards and SARs are
accounted for as liability-based awards. The value of the SARs is remeasured at each reporting date. The Company estimates
forfeitures of stock-based awards based on historical data and periodically adjusts the forfeiture rate. The adjustment of the forfeiture
rate is recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed. Compensation costs related to stock
based compensation are included in General and administrative expenses, Costs applicable to sales, and Property, plant, and
equipment, net as deemed appropriate.
The fair value of restricted stock based on the Company's stock price on the date of grant. The fair value of performance
leverage stock units (“PSUs”) with market conditions is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Stock based
compensation expense related to awards with a market or performance condition is generally recognized over the vesting period
of the award utilizing the graded vesting method, while all other awards are recognized on a straight-line basis. The Company's
estimates may be impacted by certain variables including, but not limited to, stock price volatility, employee stock option exercise
behaviors, additional stock option grants, estimates of forfeitures, the Company's performance, and related tax impacts.
Income and Mining Taxes
The Company uses an asset and liability approach which results in the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets
for the expected future tax consequences or benefits of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax
basis of assets and liabilities, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, using enacted tax rates in effect in the years
in which the differences are expected to reverse.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities,
projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. A valuation allowance has been provided
for the portion of the Company’s net deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that they will not be realized.
68
Recent Accounting Standards
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash,” which
will require entities to show the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in
the statement of cash flows. These changes become effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018. The
Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of implementing these changes on the Company's consolidated financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Classification of Certain Cash
Receipts and Cash Payments,” which provides guidance on presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and payments
in the statement of cash flows. These changes become effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018. The
Company is currently evaluating this standard and does not expect this ASU to materially impact the Company's consolidated net
income, financial position or cash flows.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which
amends several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transaction, including income tax consequences, classification
of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. These changes become effective for the
Company's fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating this standard and does not expect this
ASU to impact the Company's consolidated net income, financial position or cash flows.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases,” which will require lessees to recognize assets and liabilities
for the rights and obligations created by most leases on the balance sheet. These changes become effective for the Company's
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2019. Modified retrospective adoption for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of
initial application, is required with an option to use certain transition relief. The Company is currently evaluating the potential
impact of implementing these changes on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” which requires
entities with a classified balance sheet to present all deferred tax assets and liabilities as non-current. The updated guidance became
effective upon early adoption January 1, 2015, and resulted in a reclassification of amounts from Current deferred tax assets to
Non-current deferred tax assets and Current deferred tax liabilities to Non-current deferred tax liabilities in the current and prior
periods.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments,”
which eliminates the requirement for an acquirer to retrospectively adjust the financial statements for measurement-period
adjustments that occur in periods after a business combination is consummated. These changes were effective January 1, 2016.
The Company's adoption had no impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which has subsequently been
amended several times. The new standard provides a five-step approach to be applied to all contracts with customers and also
requires expanded disclosures about revenue recognition. These changes become effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2018. The Company has substantially completed its analysis of the new standard and reviewed potential impacts from
timing of when control is transferred to customers, variable consideration on concentrate sales and classification of refining fees.
The Company does not expect this ASU to materially impact the Company's consolidated net income, financial position or cash
flows.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” which provides a revised,
simpler measurement for inventory to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. These changes become effective
for the Company's fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of implementing
these changes on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis,” which amends the
consolidation requirements in ASC 810. These changes were effective January 1, 2016. The Company's adoption had no impact
on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
69
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 3 – SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company’s operating segments include Palmarejo, Rochester, Kensington, Wharf, San Bartolomé mines, and Coeur
Capital. All operating segments are engaged in the discovery and mining of gold and silver and generate the majority of their
revenues from the sale of these precious metals with the exception of Coeur Capital, which primarily holds the Endeavor silver
stream. Other includes the La Preciosa project, Joaquin project, corporate office, elimination of intersegment transactions, and
other items necessary to reconcile to consolidated amounts.
Financial information relating to the Company’s segments is as follows (in thousands):
Year ended December 31,
2016
Palmarejo
Rochester
Kensington
Wharf
San
Bartolomé
Coeur
Capital
Other
Total
Revenue
Metal sales
Royalties
Costs and Expenses
Costs applicable to sales(1)
Amortization
Exploration
Write-downs
Other operating expenses
Other income (expense)
Gain (Loss) on debt
extinguishments
Fair value adjustments, net
Interest expense, net
Other, net
Income and mining tax
(expense) benefit
Net income (loss)
Segment assets(2)
Capital expenditures
$
141,273
$
139,945
$
146,593
$
136,678
$
93,880
$
4,128
$
— $
662,497
—
—
—
—
141,273
139,945
146,593
136,678
80,820
36,599
5,063
—
1,213
—
(5,814)
(1,187)
(12,125)
45,085
43,537
436,642
35,810
$
$
$
89,726
21,838
841
—
2,801
—
(4,133)
(664)
(3,859)
(2,785)
96,731
34,787
3,487
—
1,038
—
—
(128)
(25)
—
66,379
20,621
2
—
—
—
(69)
17
(4,293)
$
$
$
13,298
219,009
16,446
$
$
$
10,397
199,232
36,826
$
$
$
43,093
105,901
4,812
$
$
$
—
93,880
74,166
6,633
—
—
—
—
(24)
1,590
6,252
17,990
76,317
6,631
3,280
7,408
1,719
1,117
1,797
4,446
226
—
—
(34)
6,014
—
—
—
1,566
1,740
—
36,170
3,280
665,777
409,541
123,161
12,930
4,446
46,595
(21,365)
(21,365)
(1,634)
(34,814)
10,263
(11,581)
(36,920)
1,875
(2,504)
12,484
54,239
$
$
$
1,579
9,285
$
$
(74,542) $
55,352
75,652
$ 1,122,038
— $
488
$
101,013
2,238
2,909
(1) Excludes amortization
(2) Segment assets include receivables, prepaids, inventories, property, plant and equipment, and mineral interest
70
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year ended December 31,
2015
Palmarejo
Rochester
Kensington
Wharf
San
Bartolomé
Coeur
Capital
Other
Total
Revenue
Metal sales
Royalties
Costs and Expenses
Costs applicable to sales(1)
Amortization
Exploration
Write-downs
Other operating expenses
Other income (expense)
Gain (Loss) on debt
extinguishments
Fair value adjustments, net
Interest expense, net
Other, net
Income and mining tax
(expense) benefit
Net income (loss)
Segment assets(2)
Capital expenditures
$
169,133
$
143,930
$
148,710
$
84,052
$
84,679
$
8,732
$
— $
639,236
—
—
—
169,133
143,930
148,710
138,476
103,994
105,640
32,423
4,533
224,507
1,293
—
3,160
(4,269)
(10,968)
23,906
1,324
—
2,948
—
818
(748)
(13)
37,597
(1,497)
42,240
2,596
—
1,301
—
—
(218)
7
—
—
84,052
52,197
16,378
134
—
1,717
—
—
—
143
(857)
—
84,679
75,827
17,798
126
66,712
1,787
—
—
(725)
1,557
6,850
15,582
3,520
9,010
(124)
22,118
33
—
—
—
(3,182)
—
—
—
1,996
3,058
—
41,548
6,850
646,086
479,654
143,751
11,647
313,337
50,627
15,916
15,916
1,224
(39,743)
(3,475)
5,202
(45,703)
(15,931)
(5,154)
5,542
(9,368)
26,263
$ (206,579) $
10,318
$
$
406,648
35,991
$
$
190,714
25,330
$
$
$
(3,278) $
12,912
197,873
23,834
$
$
113,305
3,211
$
$
$
(81,893) $
(16,615) $
(82,048) $ (367,183)
91,141
6,220
$
$
27,892
$
75,737
$ 1,103,310
— $
607
$
95,193
(1) Excludes amortization
(2) Segment assets include receivables, prepaids, inventories, property, plant and equipment, and mineral interests
Year ended December 31,
2014
Palmarejo
Rochester
Kensington
San
Bartolomé
Coeur Capital
Other
Total
Revenue
Metal sales
Royalties
Costs and Expenses
Costs applicable to sales(1)
Amortization
Exploration
Write-downs
Other operating expenses
Other income (expense)
Fair value adjustments, net
Interest expense, net
Other, net
Income and mining tax
(expense) benefit
Net income (loss)
Segment assets(2)
Capital expenditures
$
244,003
$
123,768
$
136,960
$
117,749
$
10,046
$
— $
632,526
—
—
—
—
244,003
123,768
136,960
117,749
187,276
69,431
6,671
784,038
620
(1,847)
(9,320)
131
251,840
91,462
20,790
2,636
—
2,813
3,653
(679)
105
(2,224)
105,342
43,619
8,005
107,832
796
—
(214)
(22)
—
89,659
19,423
120
118,754
(251)
—
(52)
2,461
18,114
3,216
13,262
4,206
7,015
515
6,202
938
—
(1)
(7,141)
2,067
—
—
—
2,158
3,793
455,895
61,966
1,812
(37,280)
(752)
3,216
635,742
477,945
162,436
21,740
1,472,721
66,882
3,618
(47,546)
(5,218)
158,457
428,254
$
$
$
(563,229) $
332,369
26,084
$
$
6,922
196,765
11,898
$
$
$
(128,870) $
(89,433) $
(10,689) $
(401,575) $ (1,186,874)
215,973
16,220
$
$
188,616
7,937
$
$
59,848
$
— $
81,688
2,105
$
$
1,075,259
64,244
(1) Excludes amortization
(2) Segment assets include receivables, prepaids, inventories, property, plant and equipment, and mineral interests
Assets
Total assets for reportable segments
Cash and cash equivalents
Other assets
Total consolidated assets
December 31, 2016
1,122,038
162,182
34,689
1,318,909
$
$
December 31, 2015
1,103,310
200,714
28,465
1,332,489
$
$
71 Geographic Information
Long-Lived Assets
Mexico
United States
Bolivia
Australia
Argentina
Other
Total
Revenue
United States
Mexico
Bolivia
Australia
Other
Total
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
397,697
338,897
31,539
2,983
10,228
5,564
786,908
$
$
December 31, 2015
390,694
336,210
35,201
5,952
10,871
9,058
787,986
$
$
$
Year ended December 31,
$
$
2016
423,216
142,198
93,880
4,128
2,355
2015
376,692
171,911
84,679
8,732
4,072
2014
260,728
245,493
117,749
10,046
1,726
$
665,777
$
646,086
$
635,742
The Company's doré, as well as the concentrate produced by the Wharf mine, is refined into gold and silver bullion
according to benchmark standards set by the LBMA, which regulates the acceptable requirements for bullion traded in the London
precious metals markets. The Company sells its silver and gold bullion to multi-national banks, bullion trading houses, and refiners
across the globe. The Company has eleven trading counterparties at December 31, 2016. The Company's sales of doré and
concentrate product produced by the Wharf mine amounted to approximately 77%, 74%, and 63% of total metal sales for the years
ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. Generally, the loss of a single bullion trading counterparty would not
adversely affect the Company due to the liquidity of the markets and availability of alternative trading counterparties.
The Company's concentrate produced by the Kensington mine is sold to smelters under purchase and sale agreements,
and the smelters pay the Company for the gold and silver recovered from the concentrates. The concentrate was sold to two smelters
at December 31, 2016. The Company's sales of concentrate produced by the Kensington mine amounted to approximately 23%,
26%, and 37% of total metal sales for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. While the loss of a
smelter may have a material adverse effect if alternate smelters are not available or if the failure to engage a new smelter results
in a delay in the sale or purchase of Kensington concentrate, the Company believes that there is sufficient global capacity available
to address the loss of a smelter.
The following table indicates customers that represent 10% or more of total sales of metal for at least one of the years
December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 (in millions):
Customer
China National Gold
Ohio Precious Metals
Republic Metal Corporation
INTL Commodities
Asahi (formerly Johnson Matthey)
Standard Bank
TD Securities
Mitsui & Co.
Year ended December 31,
2016
$
126.6
2015
$ 126.2
2014
Segments reporting revenue
$
86.8 Kensington
98.4
93.3
76.7
62.6
29.0
15.5
—
37.3
47.7
33.1
84.2
34.7
81.3
8.3 Palmarejo, San Bartolomé,
4.0 Palmarejo, San Bartolomé, Wharf
22.4 Palmarejo, San Bartolomé, Rochester, Wharf
71.8 Wharf, Rochester, San Bartolomé
87.5 Palmarejo, Rochester
106.7 Palmarejo, Rochester
137.7
133.8 Palmarejo, Rochester
72
NOTE 4 – WRITE-DOWNS
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Mining properties
Palmarejo
San Bartolomé
Kensington
La Preciosa
Joaquin
Coeur Capital
Property, plant, and equipment
Palmarejo
San Bartolomé
Kensington
La Preciosa
Total
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
$
— $
205,803
$
—
—
—
—
4,446
4,446
16,690
—
—
—
22,118
244,611
668,803
32,328
67,671
371,411
83,429
6,202
1,229,844
$
$
— $
18,704
$
115,235
—
—
—
—
50,022
—
—
68,726
86,426
40,161
1,055
242,877
4,446
$
313,337
$
1,472,721
The 2016 write-down of $4.4 million ($3.9 million net of tax) was due to the impairment of Coeur Capital assets. The
operator of the Endeavor mine in Australia, on which the Company holds a 100% silver stream, announced in early 2016 a
significant curtailment of production due to low lead and zinc prices. As a result, Coeur recorded a $2.5 million write-down of
the mineral interest associated with the Endeavor silver stream at March 31, 2016. In April 2016, Coeur sold its tiered NSR royalty
on the El Gallo mine to the operator, a subsidiary of McEwen Mining Inc., for total consideration of approximately $6.3 million,
including $1 million in contingent consideration. In anticipation of this sale, the Company recorded a $1.9 million write-down of
the mineral interest at March 31, 2016.
The 2015 write-down of $313.3 million ($276.5 million net of tax) was due to a $224.5 million impairment of the Palmarejo
complex ($193.5 million net of tax), a $66.7 million impairment of the San Bartolomé mine, and a $22.1 million impairment
($16.3 million net of tax) of certain Coeur Capital assets, including the Endeavor silver stream and other royalties. The non-cash
impairment charges were largely driven by significant decreases in long-term metal price assumptions and revised mine plans in
the fourth quarter. For purposes of this evaluation, estimates of future cash flows of the individual reporting units were used to
determine fair value. The estimated cash flows were derived from life-of-mine plans, developed using long-term pricing reflective
of the current price environment and management’s projections for operating costs.
The 2014 write-down of $1,472.7 million ($1,021.8 million net of tax) was primarily due to a $784.0 million impairment
of the Palmarejo complex ($504.5 million net of tax) and a $372.5 million impairment of the La Preciosa project ($244.9 million
net of tax) due to a decrease in the Company's long-term silver and gold price assumptions reflective of the current silver and gold
price environment and revised mine plans.
73
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 5 – RECLAMATION
Reclamation and mine closure costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. Management estimates
costs associated with reclamation of mining properties. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and assumptions,
and future expenditures could differ from current estimates.
Changes to the Company’s asset retirement obligations for operating sites are as follows:
In thousands
Asset retirement obligation - Beginning
Accretion
Additions and changes in estimates
Settlements
Asset retirement obligation - Ending
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
82,072
8,136
8,688
(1,516)
97,380
$
$
67,214
7,738
11,939
(4,819)
82,072
$
$
The Company has accrued $1.9 million and $3.2 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively,
for reclamation liabilities related to former mining activities, which are included in Reclamation.
NOTE 6 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has stock incentive plans for executives and eligible employees. Stock awards include stock options,
restricted stock, and performance shares. Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and
2014 was $9.7 million, $9.3 million and $9.3 million, respectively. At December 31, 2016, there was $6.3 million of unrecognized
stock-based compensation cost which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining vesting period of 1.4 years.
Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
Stock options and stock appreciation rights (SARs) granted under the Company’s incentive plans vest over three years
and are exercisable over a period not to exceed ten years from the grant date. The exercise price of stock options is equal to the
fair market value of the shares on the date of the grant. The value of each stock option award is estimated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. Stock options are accounted for as equity awards and SARs are accounted for as liability awards and
remeasured at each reporting date. SARs, when vested, provide the participant the right to receive cash equal to the excess of the
market price of the shares over the exercise price when exercised.
The following table sets forth the weighted average fair value of stock options and the assumptions used to estimate the
fair value of the stock options using the Black-Scholes option valuation model:
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted
Volatility
Expected life in years
Risk-free interest rate
Dividend yield
2016
2015
2014
$
1.06
$
2.65
$
3.79
61.75%
3.99
1.50%
—
55.71%
4.75
1.51%
—
50.93%
3.92
1.25%
—
74
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes stock option and SAR activity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
Granted
Canceled/forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
Granted
Canceled/forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
Granted
Exercised
Canceled/forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
Stock Options
SARs
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
27.36
9.45
23.94
16.26
5.57
12.69
12.58
2.19
7.81
16.76
10.76
Shares
415,570
415,172
(232,396)
598,346
310,028
(238,365)
670,009
183,251
(170,897)
(25,752)
656,611
$
$
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Shares
50,209
$
14.15
—
(3,637)
46,572
—
—
46,572
—
—
(4,420)
42,152
$
—
15.40
14.06
—
—
14.06
—
—
13.31
14.14
The following table summarizes outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2016.
Range of
Exercise Price
$ 0.00-$10.00
$10.00-$20.00
$20.00-$30.00
$30.00-$40.00
$40.00-$50.00
Outstanding
Vested and expected to vest
Exercisable
Number
Outstanding
455,578
52,616
141,947
3,134
3,336
656,611
618,870
292,524
$
$
$
$
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
5.32
13.33
25.73
39.90
48.50
10.76
11.20
18.31
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
8.19
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
6.64
5.26
0.22
1.03
7.36
7.27
5.97
$
$
$
1,753
1,555
118
At December 31, 2016, there was $0.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1.1 million. Cash received from
options exercised for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1.3 million for which there was no related tax benefit.The grant
date fair value for stock options vested during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $1.0 million, $1.4 million
and $1.3 million, respectively.
75
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock granted under the Company’s incentive plans are accounted for based on the market value of the underlying
shares on the date of grant and vest in equal installments annually over three years. Restricted stock awards are accounted for as
equity awards. Holders of restricted stock are entitled to vote the shares and to receive any dividends declared on the shares.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
Granted
Vested
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
Granted
Vested
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
Granted
Vested
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
Restricted Stock
Number of
Shares
613,086
$
695,897
(234,103)
(172,881)
901,999
1,180,384
(317,122)
(257,849)
1,507,412
1,768,746
(681,829)
(160,414)
2,433,915
$
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
16.68
9.83
17.16
11.87
12.19
5.49
13.38
7.59
7.49
3.72
8.51
7.16
4.48
At December 31, 2016, there was $3.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards to
be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.
76
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Performance Shares
Performance shares granted under the Company’s incentive plans are accounted for at fair value using a Monte Carlo
simulation valuation model on the date of grant. Performance share awards are accounted for as equity awards. The performance
shares vest at the end of a three-year service period if relative stockholder return and internal performance metrics are met. The
existence of a market condition requires recognition of compensation cost for the performance share awards over the requisite
period regardless of whether the relative stockholder return metric is met.
The following table summarizes performance shares activity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014:
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
Granted
Vested
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
Granted
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
Granted
Cancelled/Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
Performance Shares
Number of
Shares
210,395
$
358,398
(34,611)
(17,352)
516,830
809,293
(190,988)
1,135,135
1,437,077
(199,580)
2,372,632
$
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
28.04
12.21
27.18
27.15
17.61
6.97
15.62
10.35
1.79
17.98
4.53
At December 31, 2016, there was $2.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to performance shares to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years.
Supplemental Incentive Plan
In 2014, the Company adopted a supplemental incentive plan under which benefits were payable upon achievement of
certain performance and market conditions. The maximum potential incentive payout under the plan was $3.8 million, of which
$3.0 million was settled in cash in 2016. No additional amounts are payable under the plan.
NOTE 7 – RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
The Company has a 401(k) retirement savings plan that covers all eligible U.S. employees. Eligible employees may elect
to contribute up to 75% of base salary, subject to ERISA limitations. In addition, the Company has a deferred compensation plan
for employees whose benefits under the 401(k) plan are limited by federal regulations. The Company generally makes matching
contributions equal to 100% of the employee’s contribution up to 4% of the employee's salary. The Company may also provide
an additional contribution based on an eligible employee's salary. Total plan expenses recognized for the years ended December 31,
2016, 2015, and 2014 were $5.4 million, $2.9 million, and $2.6 million, respectively.
NOTE 8 - OTHER, NET
Other, net consists of the following:
In thousands
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
Gain on sale of assets and investments
Impairment of equity securities
Other
Other, net
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
$ (10,720) $ (15,769) $
11,334
(703)
1,964
1,875
(352)
(2,346)
2,536
$ (15,931) $
$
470
(530)
(6,593)
1,435
(5,218)
77
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 9 – INCOME AND MINING TAXES
The components of Income (loss) before income taxes are below:
In thousands
United States
Foreign
Total
$
$
Year ended December 31,
2016
(13,112) $
14,225
2014
2015
(43,924) $ (213,883)
(1,401,245)
(349,522)
$ (393,446) $(1,615,128)
1,113
The components of the consolidated Income and mining tax (expense) benefit from continuing operations are below:
In thousands
Current:
United States
United States — State mining taxes
United States — Foreign withholding tax
Argentina
Australia
Bolivia
Canada
Mexico
Deferred:
United States
United States — State mining taxes
Argentina
Australia
Bolivia
Canada
Mexico
New Zealand
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
$
— $
$
49
(4,305)
—
715
130
(5,154)
(516)
(476)
1,778
1,952
(1,197)
3,223
—
2,875
27,189
—
904
(879)
(6,250)
(71)
—
(4,008)
(145)
(10,122)
5,743
—
24,478
(401)
22,122
2,662
394,221
—
(7,826)
(4,263)
10
14
6,252
(1,841)
(9,581)
15,556
748
115
(1,638)
—
1,338
55,383
(28)
54,239
Income tax (expense) benefit
$
$
26,263
$
428,254
The Company’s effective tax rate is impacted by recurring items, such as foreign exchange rates on deferred tax balances,
uncertain tax positions, and the full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets relating to losses in the United States and certain
foreign jurisdictions. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company completed a legal entity reorganization to integrate
recent acquisitions resulting in a valuation allowance release of $40.8 million and recorded a $15.0 million deferred tax benefit
related to unremitted earnings. In addition, the Company's consolidated effective income and mining tax rate is a function of the
combined effective tax rates and foreign exchange rates in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Variations in the jurisdictional
mix of income and loss and foreign exchange rates result in significant fluctuations in our consolidated effective tax rate.
78
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
A reconciliation of the Company’s effective tax rate with the federal statutory tax rate for the periods indicated is below:
Year ended December 31,
In thousands
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit at statutory rate
State tax provision from continuing operations
2016
$
(390) $
336
Change in valuation allowance
Percentage depletion
Uncertain tax positions
U.S. and foreign non-deductible expenses
Mineral interest related
Foreign exchange rates
Foreign inflation and indexing
Foreign tax rate differences
Foreign withholding and other taxes
Foreign tax credits and other, net
Legal entity reorganization
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit
$
61,146
983
(4,619)
(5,764)
—
19,701
2,794
413
(13,478)
102
(6,985)
54,239
$
2015
137,706
(2,075)
(101,027)
—
(1,947)
1,365
(19,310)
22,350
1,117
(15,980)
8,140
(4,076)
—
2014
565,295
20,253
(151,191)
—
(4,425)
(4,892)
—
23,672
3,765
(63,930)
82,884
(43,177)
—
$
26,263
$
428,254
At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are below:
In thousands
Deferred tax liabilities:
Mexican mining tax
Mineral properties
Foreign subsidiaries — unremitted earnings
Inventory
Royalty and other long-term debt
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards
Mineral properties
Property, plant, and equipment
Mexico Mining Tax
Capital loss carryforwards
Asset retirement obligation
Unrealized foreign currency loss and other
Accrued expenses
Tax credit carryforwards
Valuation allowance
Net deferred tax liabilities
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
$
— $
69,799
1,302
4,426
8,685
15,451
—
12,999
2,353
1,648
$
84,212
$
32,451
202,756
—
87,978
6,359
6,770
25,255
7,413
17,713
31,272
385,516
(375,911)
9,605
$
74,607
$
203,958
34,966
6,980
—
3,938
21,480
8,424
17,905
26,439
324,090
(436,829)
(112,739)
145,190
79
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits
will not be realized. The Company analyzes its deferred tax assets and, if it is determined that the Company will not realize all or
a portion of its deferred tax assets, it will record or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if it is determined that the Company
will ultimately be more likely than not able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has
been provided, all or a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of factors that impact the
Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets. For additional information, please see the section titled “Risk Factors” included
in Item 1A. Based upon this analysis, the Company has recorded valuation allowances as follows:
In thousands
U.S.
Argentina
Canada
Bolivia
Mexico
New Zealand
Other
Year ended December 31,
2016
292,446
$
2015
292,677
$
6,197
1,296
37,372
13,033
23,717
1,850
8,376
1,718
45,177
63,373
25,508
—
$
375,911
$
436,829
The Company has the following tax attribute carryforwards at December 31, 2016, by jurisdiction:
In thousands
U.S.
Argentina
Bolivia
Canada
Mexico
New
Zealand
Other
Total
Regular net operating losses
$ 330,469
$
11,621
$ 63,005
$
2,301
$
91,383
$
85,258
$
63
$ 584,100
Alternative minimum tax net
operating losses
Capital losses
Alternative minimum tax credits
Foreign tax credits
184,386
19,315
3,173
24,161
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
79
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
184,386
19,394
3,173
24,161
The U.S. net operating losses expire from 2019 through 2036; the Argentina net operating losses will expire from 2017
to 2021; the Bolivia net operating losses will expire from 2018 to 2020; the Canada net operating losses will expire from 2029
through 2036; and the Mexico net operating losses expire from 2017 to 2026. The remaining net operating losses from the foreign
jurisdictions have an indefinite carryforward period. The majority of the U.S. capital losses will expire from 2020 and 2021.
Alternative minimum tax credits do not expire and foreign tax credits expire if unused beginning in 2019.
The Company intends to indefinitely reinvest earnings from Mexican operations. For the years 2016 and 2015, the
Company had no unremitted earnings from this jurisdiction.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount related to unrecognized tax benefits is below (in thousands):
Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2014
Gross increase to current period tax positions
Gross increase to prior period tax positions
Reductions in unrecognized tax benefits resulting from a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2015
Gross increase to current period tax positions
Gross increase to prior period tax positions
Reductions in unrecognized tax benefits resulting from a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016
$ 16,084
1,030
810
—
$ 17,924
1,336
4,854
(704)
$ 23,410
At December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, $19.6 million, $17.9 million, and $16.1 million, respectively, of these gross
unrecognized benefits would, if recognized, decrease the Company's effective tax rate.
80
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company operates in numerous countries around the world and is subject to, and pays annual income taxes under,
the various income tax regimes in the countries in which it operates. The Company has historically filed, and continues to file, all
required income tax returns and paid the taxes reasonably determined to be due. The tax rules and regulations in many countries
are highly complex and subject to interpretation. From time to time, the Company is subject to a review of its historic income tax
filings and, in connection with such reviews, disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation or application
of certain rules to the Company’s business conducted within the country involved.
The Company files income tax returns in various U.S. federal and state jurisdictions, in all identified foreign jurisdictions,
and various others. The statute of limitations remains open from 2012 for the US federal jurisdiction and from 2008 for certain
other foreign jurisdictions. During 2014, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service concluded its examination of the Company's 2009,
2010, and 2011 tax years. As a result of statutes of limitations that will begin to expire within the next 12 months in various
jurisdictions and possible settlement of audit-related issues with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions with respect to which
none of these issues are individually significant, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of its
unrecognized income tax liability will decrease between $1.5 million and $2.5 million in the next 12 months.
The Company classifies interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax
expense and recognized interest and penalties of $8.7 million, $9.2 million, and $6.9 million at December 31, 2016, 2015, and
2014, respectively.
NOTE 10 – NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the potential
dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, 386,771, 3,239,425, and 1,871,681, respectively, of common
stock equivalents related to equity-based awards were not included in the diluted per share calculation as the shares would be
antidilutive.
The 3.25% Convertible Senior Notes (“Convertible Notes”) were not included in the computation of diluted net income
(loss) per share for the years ended December 31, 2015, and 2014 because there is no excess value upon conversion over the
principal amount of the Convertible Notes. The outstanding Convertible Notes were redeemed in the third quarter of 2016.
In thousands except per share amounts
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
Weighted average shares:
Basic
Effect of stock-based compensation plans
Diluted
Income (loss) per share:
Basic
Diluted
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
$
55,352
$
(367,183) $ (1,186,874)
159,853
3,606
163,459
129,639
—
129,639
102,441
—
102,441
$
$
0.35
0.34
$
$
(2.83) $
(2.83) $
(11.59)
(11.59)
During the second quarter 2016, the Company completed a $75.0 million “at the market” common stock offering (the
“$75.0 million offering”). In connection with the $75.0 million offering, the Company sold 9,253,016 shares of its common stock.
During the third and fourth quarter 2016, the Company completed a $200.0 million “at the market” common stock offering (the
“$200.0 million offering”). In connection with the $200.0 million offering, the Company sold 17,691,094 shares of its common
stock.
81
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 11 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
In thousands
Palmarejo royalty obligation embedded derivative
Rochester net smelter returns (“NSR”) royalty obligation
Silver and gold options
Foreign exchange contracts
Fair value adjustments, net
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
$
$
(5,866) $
(4,133)
(1,582)
—
(11,581) $
3,101
818
1,283
—
5,202
$
$
(2,001)
3,653
1,058
908
3,618
Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure
fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
(Level 1), secondary priority to quoted prices in inactive markets or observable inputs (Level 2), and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (Level 3).
The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at
least annually) by level within the fair value hierarchy. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
In thousands
Assets:
Equity securities
Liabilities:
Rochester NSR royalty obligation
Other derivative instruments, net
In thousands
Assets:
Equity securities
Liabilities:
Palmarejo royalty obligation embedded derivative
Rochester NSR royalty obligation
Other derivative instruments, net
Fair Value at December 31, 2016
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
4,488
$
4,209
$
— $
279
9,287
762
10,049
$
—
—
— $
—
762
762
$
9,287
—
9,287
Fair Value at December 31, 2015
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
2,766
4,957
9,593
508
15,058
$
$
$
2,756
$
— $
10
— $
—
—
— $
— $
—
508
508
$
4,957
9,593
—
14,550
$
$
$
$
$
The Company’s investments in equity securities are recorded at fair market value in the financial statements based
primarily on quoted market prices. Such instruments are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Quoted market
prices are not available for certain equity securities; these securities are valued using pricing models, which require the use of
observable and unobservable inputs, and are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s silver and gold options and other derivative instruments, net, which relate to concentrate and certain doré
sales contracts and foreign exchange contracts, are valued using pricing models, which require inputs that are derived from
observable market data, including contractual terms, forward market prices, yield curves, credit spreads, and other unobservable
inputs. The model inputs can generally be verified and do not involve significant management judgment. Such instruments are
classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value of the Palmarejo royalty obligation embedded derivative and Rochester NSR royalty obligation were
estimated based on observable market data including contractual terms, forward silver and gold prices, yield curves, and credit
spreads, as well as the Company’s current mine plan which is considered a significant unobservable input. Therefore, the Company
has classified these obligations as Level 3 financial liabilities. Based on current mine plans, 1.7 years was used to estimate the
fair value of the Rochester NSR royalty obligation at December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2016, there was no Palmarejo royalty
obligation or related embedded derivative as a result of the satisfaction of the minimum ounce obligation in the third quarter of
2016.
82
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
No assets or liabilities were transferred between fair value levels in the year ended December 31, 2016.
The following tables present the changes in the fair value of the Company's Level 3 financial assets and liabilities for the
years ended December 31, 2016, and 2015:
In thousands
Assets:
Equity securities
Liabilities:
Palmarejo royalty obligation embedded
derivative
Rochester NSR royalty obligation
In thousands
Assets:
Equity securities
Liabilities:
Palmarejo royalty obligation embedded
derivative
Rochester NSR royalty obligation
$
$
$
$
$
$
Balance at the
beginning of the
period
Year ended December 31, 2016
Revaluation
Settlements
Balance at the
end of the
period
10
$
272
$
(3) $
279
4,957
9,593
$
$
5,866
4,133
$
$
(10,823) $
(4,439) $
—
9,287
Balance at the
beginning of the
period
Year ended December 31, 2015
Revaluation
Settlements
Balance at the
end of the
period
1,379
$
(983) $
(386) $
10
21,912
15,370
$
$
(3,101) $
(818) $
(13,854) $
(4,959) $
4,957
9,593
During 2016, Coeur recorded write-downs related to Mining properties totaling $4.4 million ($3.9 million net of tax).
The operator of the Endeavor mine in Australia, on which the Company has a 100% silver stream, announced in early 2016 a
significant curtailment of production due to low lead and zinc prices. As a result, Coeur recorded a $2.5 million write-down of
the mineral interest associated with the Endeavor silver stream within the Coeur Capital segment at March 31, 2016. In April
2016, Coeur sold its tiered NSR royalty on the El Gallo mine to the operator, a subsidiary of McEwen Mining Inc., for total
consideration of approximately $6.3 million, including $1 million in contingent consideration. In anticipation of this sale, the
Company recorded a $1.9 million write-down of the mineral interest within the Coeur Capital segment at March 31, 2016.
During 2015, Coeur recorded write-downs related to Property, plant, and equipment and Mining properties totaling
$313.3 million ($276.5 million net of tax). The fair values of Property, plant, and equipment and Mining properties were estimated
using a discounted cash flow approach. The discounted cash flow model used significant unobservable inputs and is therefore
classified within Level 3 for the fair value hierarchy. The following table sets forth the quantitative and qualitative information
related to the unobservable inputs used in the calculation of the Company's non-recurring Level 3 fair value measurements:
Description
Valuation technique Unobservable input
Property, plant, and equipment and Mining properties Discounted cash flow Discount rate
Range / Weighted
Average
7.50% - 11.00%
Long-term silver price
Long-term gold price
$17.50
$1,200
During 2014, Coeur recorded write-downs related to Property, plant, and equipment and Mining properties totaling
$1,472.7 million ($1,021.8 million net of tax). The fair values of Property, plant, and equipment and Mining properties were
estimated using a discounted cash flow approach. The discounted cash flow model used significant unobservable inputs and is
therefore classified within Level 3 for the fair value hierarchy. The following table sets forth the quantitative and qualitative
information related to the unobservable inputs used in the calculation of the Company's non-recurring Level 3 fair value
measurements:
83
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Description
Valuation technique Unobservable input
Property, plant, and equipment and Mining properties Discounted cash flow Discount rate
Range / Weighted
Average
8.00% - 10.75%
Long-term silver price
Long-term gold price
$19.00
$1,275
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities carried at book value in the financial statements at December 31, 2016 and
December 31, 2015 is presented in the following table:
In thousands
Liabilities:
Book Value
Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
December 31, 2016
7.875% Senior Notes due 2021(1)
$
(1) Net of unamortized debt issuance costs and premium received of $2.0 million.
175,991
$
184,373
$
— $
184,373
$
—
The fair values of 7.875% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “Senior Notes”) outstanding were estimated using quoted market prices.
In thousands
Liabilities:
3.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028
Senior Notes(1)
Term Loan due 2020(2)
San Bartolomé Lines of Credit
Palmarejo gold production royalty obligation
Book Value
Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
December 31, 2015
$
712
$
693
$
— $
693
$
373,433
227,487
94,489
4,571
15,207
99,500
4,571
15,580
—
—
—
—
227,487
99,500
4,571
—
15,580
—
—
—
—
(1) Net of unamortized debt issuance costs and premium received of $5.3 million.
(2) Net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $5.0 million.
The fair values of the Senior Notes outstanding were estimated using quoted market prices. The fair value of the Term
Loan due 2020 (the “Term Loan”) approximates book value (excluding unamortized debt issuance costs) as the liability is secured,
has a variable interest rate, and lacks significant credit concerns. The fair value of the San Bartolomé line of credit approximates
book value due to the short-term nature of the liability and absence of significant interest rate or credit concerns. The fair value
of the Palmarejo gold production royalty obligation is estimated based on observable market data including contractual terms,
forward silver and gold prices, yield curves, and credit spreads, as well as the Company’s current mine plan which is considered
a significant unobservable input.
NOTE 12 – DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Palmarejo Gold Production Royalty
In January 2009, the Company's subsidiary, Coeur Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (“Coeur Mexicana”), entered into a gold
production royalty agreement with a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada Corporation. The royalty covered 50% of the life of mine
production from the Palmarejo mine and legacy adjacent properties, excluding production from the properties acquired in the 2015
Paramount Gold and Silver Corp. (“Paramount”) acquisition. The royalty transaction included a minimum obligation of 4,167
gold ounces per month and terminated effective as of the date payments on 400,000 gold ounces were made, which occurred in
July 2016.
The price volatility associated with the minimum royalty obligation was considered an embedded derivative. The Company
was required to recognize the change in fair value of the remaining minimum obligation due to changing gold prices. Unrealized
gains were recognized in periods when the gold price decreased from the previous period and unrealized losses were recognized
in periods when the gold price increases. The fair value of the embedded derivative was reflected net of the Company's current
credit adjusted risk free rate, which was 19.9% at December 31, 2015. The fair value of the embedded derivative at December 31,
2015 was a liability of $5.0 million. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, the mark-to-market adjustments
were losses of $5.9 million and gains of $17.0 million, and $18.4 million, respectively.
Payments on the royalty obligation decreased the carrying amount of the minimum obligation and the derivative liability.
Each monthly payment was an amount equal to the greater of the minimum of 4,167 ounces of gold or 50% of actual gold production
84
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
multiplied by the excess of the monthly average market price of gold above $416 per ounce, subject to a 1% annual inflation
adjustment. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 realized losses on settlement of the liabilities were $10.8
million, $13.9 million, and $20.4 million , respectively. The mark-to-market adjustments and realized losses are included in Fair
value adjustments, net.
Provisional Silver and Gold Sales
The Company enters into sales contracts with third-party smelters and refiners which, in some cases, provide for a
provisional payment based upon preliminary assays and quoted metal prices. The provisionally priced sales contracts contain an
embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the
receivable recorded at the forward price at the time of sale. The embedded derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and
are marked to market through earnings each period until final settlement. Changes in silver and gold prices resulted in provisional
pricing mark-to-market losses of $0.3 million, gains of $0.3 million, and losses of $0.1 million in the years ended December 31,
2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. At December 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding provisionally priced sales of 0.4 million
ounces of silver and 25,505 ounces of gold at prices of $16.35 and $1,208, respectively.
At December 31, 2016, the Company had the following derivative instruments that settle as follows:
In thousands except average prices and notional ounces
2017
Thereafter
Provisional silver sales
Average silver price
Notional ounces
Provisional gold sales
Average gold price
Notional ounces
Silver and Gold Options
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
5,801
16.35
354,771
30,810
1,208
25,505
—
—
—
—
—
—
During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 the Company had realized losses of $1.6 million, realized
gains of $1.3 million, and realized losses of $0.6 million, respectively, from settled contracts. During the year ended December
31, 2014, the Company recorded unrealized gains of $1.5 million. During the years ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, the
Company had no unrealized gains or losses related to outstanding options which were included in Fair value adjustments, net. At
December 31, 2016, the Company had no outstanding gold and silver options contracts.
The following summarizes the classification of the fair value of the derivative instruments:
December 31, 2016
In thousands
Provisional silver and gold sales contracts
In thousands
Palmarejo gold production royalty
Provisional silver and gold sales contracts
Prepaid
expenses and other
$
— $
Accrued
liabilities and other
762
$
Current portion of
royalty obligation
Non-current portion
of royalty obligation
—
— $
Prepaid
expenses and other
$
— $
$
28
28
$
December 31, 2015
Accrued
liabilities and other
Current portion of
royalty obligation
— $
536
536
$
4,957
—
4,957
$
Non-current portion
of royalty obligation
—
$
—
—
85
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following represent mark-to-market gains (losses) on derivative instruments for the years ended December 31,
2016, 2015, and 2014 and 2015 (in thousands):
Financial statement line
Revenue
Costs applicable to sales
Fair value adjustments, net
Fair value adjustments, net
Fair value adjustments, net
Credit Risk
Derivative
Provisional silver and gold sales contracts $
Foreign exchange contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Palmarejo gold royalty
Silver and gold options
$
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
(254) $
—
—
(5,866)
(1,582)
(7,702) $
296
—
—
3,101
1,283
4,680
$
(123)
924
(16)
(2,001)
1,058
(158)
The credit risk exposure related to any derivative instrument is limited to the unrealized gains, if any, on outstanding
contracts based on current market prices. To reduce counter-party credit exposure, the Company enters into contracts with
institutions management deems credit worthy and limits credit exposure to each institution. The Company does not anticipate non-
performance by any of its counterparties.
NOTE 13 – ACQUISITIONS
In April 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of Paramount, which held mineral claims adjacent to the Company's
Palmarejo mine, including a continuation of the Independencia deposit. Upon closing, Paramount became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, and each issued and outstanding share of Paramount common stock was converted into 0.2016 shares
of Coeur common stock, with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares. Immediately prior to completion of the acquisition, Paramount
spun off to its existing stockholders a separate, publicly-traded company, Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. ("SpinCo"), which owns
the Sleeper Gold Project and other assets in Nevada. SpinCo was capitalized with $8.5 million in cash contributed by Coeur, which
amount has been included in the total consideration paid for the acquisition of Paramount. The Company also paid $1.5 million
to acquire 4.9% of the newly issued and outstanding shares of SpinCo.
The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, as Paramount is an exploration stage project, which requires
that the total purchase price be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their relative fair values. The
purchase price and acquired assets and liabilities were as follows (in thousands except share data):
Common shares issued (32,667,327 at $5.78)
Cash
Transaction advisory fees and other acquisition costs
Total purchase price
Total assets acquired
Total liabilities assumed
Net assets acquired
$
$
188,817
8,530
4,020
201,367
307,193
105,826
201,367
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been assigned to the Palmarejo reportable operating segment.
In February 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of the Wharf gold mine located near Lead, South Dakota, from
a subsidiary of Goldcorp in exchange for $99.4 million in cash. The transaction was accounted for as a business combination
which requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their respective fair values at the acquisition date. The
Company incurred $2.1 million of acquisition costs, which are included in Pre-development, reclamation, and other on the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
86
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The purchase price allocation was based on the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities as follows (in thousands):
Total assets acquired
Total liabilities assumed
Net assets acquired
133,269
33,873
99,396
$
The following table presents the unaudited pro forma summary of the Company’s Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 as if the acquisition had occurred on
January 1, 2014. The following unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is
not necessarily indicative of the results of operations as they would have been had the transaction occurred on the assumed date,
nor is it necessarily an indication of trends in future results for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to, differences
between the assumptions used to prepare the pro forma information, potential synergies, and cost savings from operating
efficiencies.
In thousands
Revenue
Income (loss) before income and mining taxes
Net income (loss)
$
2016
665,777
1,113
55,352
2015 (Pro Forma)
664,086
$
(393,498)
(367,235)
2014 (Pro Forma)
729,742
$
(1,587,128)
(1,158,874)
NOTE 14 – INVESTMENTS
Equity Securities
The Company makes strategic investments in equity securities of silver and gold exploration and development companies.
These investments are classified as available-for-sale and are measured at fair value in the financial statements with unrealized
gains and losses recorded in Other comprehensive income (loss).
In thousands
Kootenay Silver, Inc.
Silver Bull Resources, Inc.
Other
Equity securities
In thousands
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
Northair Silver Corp.
Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd.
Silver Bull Resources, Inc.
Other
Equity securities
At December 31, 2016
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Estimated
Fair Value
— $
—
—
— $
— $
783
598
1,381
$
2,645
1,016
827
4,488
At December 31, 2015
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Estimated
Fair Value
(1,036) $
—
—
—
(143)
(1,179) $
— $
9
518
—
32
559
$
434
734
938
305
355
2,766
Cost
2,645
233
229
3,107
Cost
1,470
725
420
305
466
3,386
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
The Company performs a quarterly assessment on each of its equity securities with unrealized losses to determine if the
security is other than temporarily impaired. The Company recorded pre-tax other-than-temporary impairment losses of $0.7 million,
$2.3 million, and $6.6 million in the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, in Other, net.
87
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 15 – RECEIVABLES
Receivables consist of the following:
In thousands
Current receivables:
Trade receivables
Income tax receivable
Value added tax receivable
Other
Non-current receivables:
Value added tax receivable
Income tax receivable
Total receivables
NOTE 16 – INVENTORY AND ORE ON LEACH PADS
Inventory consists of the following:
In thousands
Inventory:
Concentrate
Precious metals
Supplies
Ore on leach pads:
Current
Non-current
Total inventory and ore on leach pads
NOTE 17 – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
In thousands
Land
Facilities and equipment
Assets under capital leases
Accumulated amortization
Construction in progress
Property, plant and equipment, net
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
$
$
$
$
10,669
1,038
46,083
2,641
60,431
19,293
11,658
30,951
91,382
$
$
$
$
17,878
13,678
50,669
3,767
85,992
24,768
—
24,768
110,760
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
$
$
$
$
$
17,994
47,228
40,804
106,026
64,167
67,231
131,398
237,424
$
$
$
$
$
16,165
21,908
43,638
81,711
67,329
44,582
111,911
193,622
December 31, 2016
7,878
$
650,480
54,968
713,326
(524,806)
188,520
28,276
216,796
$
December 31, 2015
8,287
$
654,585
30,648
693,520
(514,509)
179,011
16,988
195,999
$
Rent expense for operating lease agreements was $16.8 million, $14.3 million, and $11.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
88
Accumulated
amortization
Mineral interests
Accumulated
amortization
Mining properties,
net
Accumulated
amortization
Mineral interests
Accumulated
amortization
Mining properties,
net
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 18 – MINING PROPERTIES
Mining properties consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2016
Palmarejo
Rochester Kensington
Wharf
San
Bartolomé
La
Preciosa
Joaquin
Coeur
Capital
Total
Mine development
$ 174,890
$ 165,230
$ 271,175
$ 37,485
$ 39,184
$
— $
— $
— $ 687,964
(134,995)
(138,244)
(154,744)
(11,699)
(32,192)
25,786
45,837
6,992
12,868
—
—
—
—
49,085
10,000
37,272
— (471,874)
—
216,090
784,365
39,895
629,303
(381,686)
247,617
26,986
116,431
—
—
—
—
—
—
(19,249)
(11,695)
—
—
(29,370)
(442,000)
26,588
1,173
49,085
10,000
7,902
342,365
$ 287,512
$ 26,986
$ 116,431
$ 52,374
$
8,165
$ 49,085
$ 10,000
$
7,902
$ 558,455
December 31, 2015
Palmarejo
Rochester Kensington
Wharf
San
Bartolomé
La
Preciosa
Joaquin
Coeur
Capital
Total
Mine development
$ 151,828
$ 149,756
$ 238,786
$ 32,318
$ 39,474
$
— $
— $
— $ 612,162
(131,055)
(126,242)
(131,236)
(5,784)
(30,325)
26,534
45,837
9,149
12,868
—
—
—
—
49,085
10,000
59,343
— (424,642)
—
187,520
806,436
20,773
629,303
(348,268)
281,035
23,514
107,550
—
—
—
—
—
—
(10,551)
(11,400)
—
—
(34,518)
(404,737)
35,286
1,468
49,085
10,000
24,825
401,699
$ 301,808
$ 23,514
$ 107,550
$ 61,820
$ 10,617
$ 49,085
$ 10,000
$ 24,825
$ 589,219
Palmarejo is located in the State of Chihuahua in northern Mexico and consists of the Palmarejo mine and mill, the
Guadalupe underground mine, the Independencia underground mine, and other deposits and exploration targets. Palmarejo
commenced production in April 2009.
The Rochester silver and gold mine, located in northwestern Nevada has been operated by the Company since September
1986. The mine utilizes heap-leaching to extract both silver and gold from ore mined using open pit methods.
The Kensington mine is an underground gold mine and consists of the Kensington and adjacent Jualin properties located
north-northwest of Juneau, Alaska. The Company commenced commercial production in July 2010.
The Wharf gold mine is an open pit gold mine located near the city of Lead, South Dakota. The Company acquired
Wharf in February 2015.
The San Bartolomé mine is a silver mine located near the city of Potosi, Bolivia. The Company commenced commercial
production at San Bartolomé in June 2008.
The La Preciosa silver-gold project is located in the State of Durango in northern Mexico. The Company completed a
feasibility study in 2014 and has deferred construction activities until expected returns improve.
The Joaquin silver-gold project is located in the Santa Cruz province of southern Argentina. The Company commenced
exploration of the property in November 2007. In January 2017, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Joaquin silver-
gold exploration project for total consideration of $25.0 million. The Company will also retain a 2.0% NSR royalty on the Joaquin
project. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2017, subject to customary closing conditions.
The Company's mineral interests held by Coeur Capital primarily consist of the Endeavor silver stream, acquired by the
Company in May 2005, under which the Company owns all silver production and reserves up to 20.0 million ounces at the Endeavor
mine in Australia, owned and operated by Cobar Operations Pty. Limited. The Company has received 6.0 million ounces to-date
and the current ore reserve contains 1.4 million ounces. The operator of the Endeavor mine announced in early 2016 a significant
curtailment of production due to low lead and zinc prices. As a result, Coeur recorded a $2.5 million write-down of the mineral
interest associated with the Endeavor silver stream within the Coeur Capital segment at March 31, 2016.
89
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Non-core Asset Sales
In March 2016, Coeur sold its 2.0% NSR royalty on the Cerro Bayo mine to the operator, a subsidiary of Mandalay
Resources Corporation (“Mandalay”), for total consideration of approximately $5.7 million, consisting of $4.0 million in cash
and 2.5 million Mandalay shares. The Company recognized a $1.9 million pre-tax gain on this sale. The mineral interest associated
with the Cerro Bayo mine was included in the Coeur Capital segment.
In April 2016, Coeur sold its tiered NSR royalty on the El Gallo mine to the operator, a subsidiary of McEwen Mining
Inc., for total consideration of approximately $6.3 million, including $1 million in contingent consideration. In anticipation of this
sale, the Company recorded a $1.9 million write-down of the mineral interest within the Coeur Capital segment at March 31, 2016.
In April 2016, Coeur sold its 2.5% NSR royalty on the La Cigarra project to Kootenay Silver Inc. for total consideration
of approximately $3.6 million, consisting of $0.5 million in cash and 9.6 million Kootenay shares. The Company recognized a
$1.2 pre-tax gain on this sale. The mineral interest associated with La Cigarra was included in the Coeur Capital segment.
In May 2016, Coeur sold its Martha assets and related liabilities in Argentina to Hunt Mining Corp. for total cash
consideration of $3.0 million, including $1.5 million received at closing and $1.5 million receivable on the one-year anniversary
of the closing. The Company recognized a $5.3 million pre-tax gain on this sale.
In July 2016, the Company sold its NSR royalty on the Correnso mine in New Zealand to the operator, a subsidiary of
Oceana Gold Corporation, for total consideration of $5.4 million, including $0.7 million in contingent consideration. The Company
recognized a $4.7 million pre-tax gain on this sale.
90
NOTE 19 – DEBT
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
Current
In thousands
Senior Notes, net(1)
3.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028
Term Loan due 2020, net(2)
San Bartolomé Lines of Credit
Capital lease obligations
Non-Current
373,433
712
93,489
4,571
7,774
479,979
(1) Net of unamortized debt issuance costs and premium received of $2.0 million and $5.3 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
(2) Net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $5.0 million at December 31, 2015.
Non-Current
175,991
—
—
—
22,866
198,857
— $
—
—
—
12,039
12,039
— $
—
1,000
—
9,431
10,431
Current
$
$
$
$
$
$
7.875% Senior Notes due 2021
In December 2016, the Company redeemed $190.0 million aggregate principal amount of its Senior Notes. The “make-
whole premium” redemption price payment of $9.0 million was calculated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
Notes. The redemption of the Senior Notes resulted in a loss of $11.3 million.
In August 2016, the Company entered into two privately-negotiated agreements to exchange $10.8 million in aggregate
principal amount of its Senior Notes for 0.7 million shares of common stock. Based on the closing price of the Company's common
stock on the date of the exchange, the exchange resulted in a loss of $1.2 million.
In November 2015, the Company entered into a privately-negotiated agreement to exchange $54.2 million in aggregate
principal amount of its Senior Notes for 14.4 million shares of common stock. Based on the closing price of the Company's common
stock on the date of the exchange, the exchange resulted in a gain of $15.9 million. During 2015 and 2014, the Company repurchased
$71.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes.
On or after February 1, 2017, the Company may redeem some or all of the Senior Notes at the applicable redemption
prices set forth in the Indenture for the Senior Notes, together with accrued and unpaid interest.
In March 2014, the Company completed a follow-on offering of $150 million in aggregate principal amount of the Senior
Notes (the “Additional Notes”) in a private placement conducted pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The Additional Notes constitute a further issuance of the Original Notes (as defined
below) and form a single series of debt securities with the Original Notes. Upon completion of Coeur’s offering of the Additional
Notes, the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Senior Notes was $450.0 million. The Company commenced an exchange
offer for the Additional Notes on April 10, 2014 to exchange the Additional Notes for freely transferable notes containing
substantially similar terms, in accordance with the registration rights granted to the holders of the Additional Notes when they
were issued. The exchange offer was consummated on May 9, 2014.
3.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028
In July 2016, all outstanding Convertible Notes were redeemed for $0.7 million.
Term Loan due 2020
In July 2016, the Company voluntarily terminated and repaid the Term Loan for $103.4 million including the $99.0
million remaining principal balance and a $4.4 million prepayment premium. The termination of the Term Loan resulted in a loss
of $8.8 million.
In July 2015, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement for the Term Loan with Barclays
Bank PLC, as administrative agent (the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”). The Term Loan Credit Agreement provided for a five
year $100.0 million term loan to the Company, of which a portion of the proceeds were used to repay the Short-term Loan, and
the remaining proceeds were used for general corporate purposes. The obligations under the Term Loan were secured by
substantially all of the assets of the Company and its domestic subsidiaries, including the land, mineral rights and infrastructure
at the Kensington, Rochester and Wharf mines, as well as a pledge of the shares of certain of the Company's subsidiaries.
Lines of Credit
At December 31, 2016, San Bartolomé had an available line of credit for $12.0 million that matures in June 30, 2018,
bearing interest at 6.0% per annum, which is secured with machinery and equipment. There was no outstanding balance at December
31, 2016.
91
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
At December 31, 2015, San Bartolomé had two outstanding lines of credit. The first line of credit was for $12.0 million
bearing interest at 6.0% per annum, maturing June 30, 2018. The second line of credit was for $15.0 million bearing interest at
6.0% per annum that matured on December 29, 2016. Both lines of credit were secured with machinery and equipment. There
was an outstanding balance of $4.6 million on the second line of credit at December 31, 2015.
Short-term Loan
In March 2015, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Short-term Credit Agreement”) with The Bank of
Nova Scotia. The Short-term Credit Agreement provided for a $50.0 million loan (the “Short-term Loan”) to the Company. On
June 25, 2015, the Short-term Loan was repaid in full, the security for the Short-term Loan was released, and the Short-term Credit
Agreement was terminated.
Capital Lease Obligations
From time to time, the Company acquires mining equipment under capital lease agreements. In 2016, the Company
entered into new lease financing arrangements primarily for a larger haul truck fleet at its Rochester mine and mining equipment
to support the continued underground mine expansion at the Palmarejo complex. All capital lease obligations are recorded, upon
lease inception, at the present value of future minimum lease payments.
Minimum future lease payments under capital and operating leases with terms longer than one year are as follows:
At December 31, (In thousands)
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Total
Less: imputed interest
Net lease obligation
Interest Expense
In thousands
7.875% Senior Notes due 2021
3.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028
Term Loan due 2020
Short-term Loan
San Bartolomé Lines of Credit
Revolving Credit Facility
Loss on Revolving Credit Facility
Capital lease obligations
Accretion of Palmarejo gold production royalty obligation
Amortization of debt issuance costs
Accretion of debt premium
Other debt obligations
Capitalized interest
Total interest expense, net of capitalized interest
Operating leases
Capital leases
$
$
$
13,709 $
5,514
5,304
3,891
3,095
8,716
40,229 $
—
40,229 $
13,292
10,968
6,481
3,675
2,886
44
37,346
(2,441)
34,905
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
28,871
13
4,939
—
15
—
—
1,437
1,211
1,933
(345)
72
(1,226)
36,920
$
$
33,437
54
4,719
326
795
—
—
1,035
6,567
2,257
(409)
20
(3,098)
45,703
$
$
32,741
173
—
—
—
179
3,035
972
10,773
1,740
(357)
—
(1,710)
47,546
$
$
92
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 20 - SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION
The following Consolidating Financial Statements are presented to satisfy disclosure requirements of Rule 3-10 of
Regulation S-X resulting from the guarantees by Coeur Alaska, Inc., Coeur Explorations, Inc., Coeur Rochester, Inc., Coeur South
America Corp., Wharf Resources (U.S.A.), Inc. and its subsidiaries, and Coeur Capital, Inc. (collectively, the “Subsidiary
Guarantors”) of the Senior Notes. The following schedules present Consolidating Financial Statements of (a) Coeur, the parent
company; (b) the Subsidiary Guarantors; and (c) certain wholly-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries of the Company
(collectively, the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”). Each of the Subsidiary Guarantors is 100% owned by Coeur and the guarantees
are full and unconditional and joint and several obligations. There are no restrictions on the ability of Coeur to obtain funds from
the Subsidiary Guarantors by dividend or loan.
93
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016
In thousands
Revenue
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Costs applicable to sales(1)
Amortization
COSTS AND EXPENSES
General and administrative
Exploration
Write-downs
Pre-development, reclamation, and other
Total costs and expenses
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET
Loss on debt extinguishments
Fair value adjustments, net
Other, net
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
Total other income (expense), net
Loss before income and mining taxes
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit
Total loss after income and mining taxes
Equity income (loss) in consolidated subsidiaries
NET INCOME (LOSS)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax
Reclassification adjustments for impairment of equity securities, net of tax
Reclassification adjustments for realized loss on sale of equity securities, net of tax
Other comprehensive income (loss)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(1) Excludes amortization.
Coeur Mining,
Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
$
— $
423,488
$
242,289
$
— $
665,777
—
1,558
28,704
1,596
—
2,044
33,902
(21,365)
(1,635)
4,357
(35,158)
(53,801)
(87,703)
11,733
(75,970)
131,322
252,836
77,392
156,705
44,211
250
6,127
—
5,839
422
5,207
4,446
9,336
342,444
220,327
—
(4,133)
2,139
(861)
(2,855)
78,189
(7,517)
70,672
(4,353)
—
(5,813)
463
(5,985)
(11,335)
10,627
50,023
60,650
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(5,084)
5,084
—
—
—
—
(126,969)
409,541
123,161
29,376
12,930
4,446
17,219
596,673
(21,365)
(11,581)
1,875
(36,920)
(67,991)
1,113
54,239
55,352
—
$
55,352
$
66,319
$
60,650
$
(126,969)
$
55,352
3,222
703
(2,691)
1,234
3,156
703
(3,181)
678
—
—
—
—
(3,156)
(703)
3,181
(678)
$
56,586
$
66,997
$
60,650
$
(127,647)
$
3,222
703
(2,691)
1,234
56,586
94 Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015
In thousands
Revenue
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Costs applicable to sales(1)
Amortization
COSTS AND EXPENSES
General and administrative
Exploration
Write-downs
Pre-development, reclamation, and other
Total costs and expenses
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET
Gain on debt extinguishments
Fair value adjustments, net
Other, net
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
Total other income (expense), net
Income (Loss) before income and mining taxes
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit
Income (Loss) after income and mining taxes
Equity income (loss) in consolidated subsidiaries
NET INCOME (LOSS)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) on equity securities, net of tax
Reclassification adjustments for impairment of equity securities, net of tax
Reclassification adjustments for realized loss on sale of equity securities, net of tax
Other comprehensive income (loss)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(1) Excludes amortization.
Coeur Mining,
Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
$
— $
378,278
$
267,808
$
— $
646,086
—
1,991
32,405
2,265
—
4,083
40,744
15,916
1,224
4,336
(39,867)
(18,391)
(59,135)
1,827
(57,308)
(309,875)
261,830
83,325
35
3,931
1,630
5,920
356,671
—
818
(3,106)
(966)
(3,254)
18,353
(2,354)
15,999
(14,814)
217,824
58,435
394
5,451
311,707
7,790
601,601
—
3,160
(13,385)
(8,646)
(18,871)
(352,664)
26,790
(325,874)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(3,776)
3,776
—
—
—
—
—
324,689
479,654
143,751
32,834
11,647
313,337
17,793
999,016
15,916
5,202
(15,931)
(45,703)
(40,516)
(393,446)
26,263
(367,183)
—
$
(367,183)
$
1,185
$
(325,874)
$
324,689
$
(367,183)
(4,154)
2,346
894
(914)
(3,118)
2,346
894
122
—
—
—
—
3,118
(2,346)
(894)
(122)
(4,154)
2,346
894
(914)
$
(368,097)
$
1,307
$
(325,874)
$
324,567
$
(368,097)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014
In thousands
Revenue
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Costs applicable to sales(1)
Amortization
COSTS AND EXPENSES
General and administrative
Exploration
Write-downs
Pre-development, reclamation, and other
Total costs and expenses
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET
Fair value adjustments, net
Other, net
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
Total other income (expense), net
Income (Loss) before income and mining taxes
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit
Income (Loss) after income and mining taxes
Equity income (loss) in consolidated subsidiaries
NET INCOME (LOSS)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) on equity securities, net of tax
Reclassification adjustments for impairment of equity securities, net of tax
Reclassification adjustments for realized loss on sale of equity securities, net of tax
Other comprehensive income (loss)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(1) Excludes amortization.
Coeur Mining,
Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
$
— $
261,963
$
373,779
$
— $
635,742
—
1,805
39,976
3,560
—
8,813
54,154
1,812
4,406
(38,389)
(32,171)
(86,325)
1,742
(84,583)
(1,102,291)
196,805
65,100
6
11,157
107,832
3,889
384,789
3,653
(7,023)
(891)
(4,261)
(127,087)
(2,224)
(129,311)
(4,181)
281,140
95,531
863
7,023
1,364,889
13,335
1,762,781
(1,847)
227
(11,094)
(12,714)
(1,401,716)
428,736
(972,980)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(2,828)
2,828
—
—
—
—
—
1,106,472
477,945
162,436
40,845
21,740
1,472,721
26,037
2,201,724
3,618
(5,218)
(47,546)
(49,146)
(1,615,128)
428,254
(1,186,874)
—
$
(1,186,874)
$
(133,492)
$
(972,980)
$
1,106,472
$
(1,186,874)
(2,290)
4,042
346
2,098
(2,272)
4,042
328
2,098
—
—
—
—
2,272
(4,042)
(328)
(2,098)
(2,290)
4,042
346
2,098
$
(1,184,776)
$
(131,394)
$
(972,980)
$
1,104,374
$
(1,184,776)
95 Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016
In thousands
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Coeur
Mining, Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
62,207
$
134,892
$
55,687
$
(126,969)
125,817
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures
Proceeds from the sale of long-lived assets
Purchase of investments
Sales and maturities of investments
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Other
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
(246)
—
(178)
501
—
(4,396)
(107,855)
(112,174)
(58,084)
4,800
—
6,576
—
368
25,047
(21,293)
Payments on debt, capital leases, and associated costs
(303,686)
(10,894)
Gold production royalty payments
Net intercompany financing activity
Issuance of common stock
Other
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
—
45,850
269,556
172
11,892
—
(38,075)
96,123
—
(86,914)
—
—
(97,808)
4
15,795
34,228
(42,683)
11,496
—
—
(1,417)
(180)
—
(32,784)
(8,221)
(27,155)
(3,097)
—
—
(38,473)
(682)
(16,252)
70,363
—
—
—
—
—
—
82,808
82,808
—
—
44,161
—
—
44,161
—
—
—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
58,048
$
50,023
$
54,111
$
— $
(101,013)
16,296
(178)
7,077
(1,417)
(4,208)
—
(83,443)
(322,801)
(27,155)
—
269,556
172
(80,228)
(678)
(38,532)
200,714
162,182
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015
In thousands
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Coeur
Mining, Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
(377,091) $
86,486
$
79,458
$
324,689
113,542
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures
Proceeds from the sale of long-lived assets
Purchase of investments
Sales and maturities of investments
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Other
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of notes and bank borrowings
Payments on debt, capital leases, and associated costs
Gold production royalty payments
Net intercompany financing activity
Other
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
(514)
—
(1,880)
2
(110,846)
(4,710)
282,041
164,093
150,000
(62,930)
—
12,232
(542)
98,760
—
(114,238)
210,361
(52,376)
(42,303)
289
—
532
—
234
20,239
(31,082)
—
(7,428)
—
(19,518)
—
(26,946)
(11)
28,447
5,781
318
—
71
—
(110)
120
(41,904)
3,500
(14,357)
(39,235)
29,575
—
(20,517)
(1,393)
15,644
54,719
—
—
—
—
—
—
(302,400)
(302,400)
—
—
—
(22,289)
—
(22,289)
—
—
—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
96,123
$
34,228
$
70,363
$
— $
(95,193)
607
(1,880)
605
(110,846)
(4,586)
—
(211,293)
153,500
(84,715)
(39,235)
—
(542)
29,008
(1,404)
(70,147)
270,861
200,714
96 Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014
In thousands
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Coeur
Mining, Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
(1,175,464) $
41,292
$
81,248
$
1,106,472
53,548
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures
Proceeds from the sale of long-lived assets
Purchase of investments
Sales and maturities of investments
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Other
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of notes and bank borrowings
Payments on debt, capital leases, and associated costs
Gold production royalty payments
Net intercompany financing activity
Other
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
(1,849)
—
(50,013)
49,069
(12,079)
—
1,151,372
1,136,500
153,000
(18,545)
—
(21,697)
(509)
112,249
—
73,285
137,076
(28,118)
(34,277)
48
(429)
5,261
(4,000)
—
4,106
281
(71)
14
(5,250)
(321)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,155,478)
(64,244)
329
(50,513)
54,344
(21,329)
(321)
—
(23,132)
(39,624)
(1,155,478)
(81,734)
—
(6,114)
—
(7,256)
—
(13,370)
—
4,790
991
14,784
(1,243)
(48,395)
(20,053)
—
(54,907)
(621)
(13,904)
68,623
—
—
—
49,006
—
49,006
—
—
—
167,784
(25,902)
(48,395)
—
(509)
92,978
(621)
64,171
206,690
270,861
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
210,361
$
5,781
$
54,719
$
— $
97 Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 2016
In thousands
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables
Ore on leach pads
Inventory
Prepaid expenses and other
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment, net
Mining properties, net
Ore on leach pads
Restricted assets
Equity securities
Receivables
Deferred tax assets
Net investment in subsidiaries
Other
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable
Other accrued liabilities
Debt
Royalty obligations
Reclamation
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Debt
Royalty obligations
Reclamation
Deferred tax liabilities
Other long-term liabilities
Intercompany payable (receivable)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock
Coeur
Mining, Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Consolidated
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
58,048
12
—
—
3,803
61,863
3,222
—
—
10,170
—
—
—
273,056
221,381
569,692
2,153
12,881
—
—
—
15,034
175,991
—
—
13,810
1,993
(405,623)
(213,829)
50,023
6,865
64,167
49,393
1,459
171,907
139,885
195,791
67,231
226
4,488
—
—
11,650
9,263
600,441
24,921
13,664
6,516
4,995
2,672
52,768
15,214
4,292
75,183
6,179
4,750
336,813
442,431
54,111
53,554
—
56,633
12,719
177,017
73,689
362,664
—
7,201
—
30,951
191
—
3,153
654,866
26,261
16,198
5,523
—
850
48,832
229,036
—
20,621
54,809
53,294
68,810
426,570
$
— $
—
—
—
—
—
162,182
60,431
64,167
106,026
17,981
410,787
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(284,706)
(221,384)
216,796
558,455
67,231
17,597
4,488
30,951
191
—
12,413
$ (506,090) $ 1,318,909
$
— $
—
—
—
—
—
(221,384)
—
—
—
—
—
(221,384)
53,335
42,743
12,039
4,995
3,522
116,634
198,857
4,292
95,804
74,798
60,037
—
433,788
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated deficit
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $
1,809
3,314,590
(2,545,424)
(2,488)
768,487
569,692
$
250
181,009
(73,529)
(2,488)
105,242
600,441
197,913
1,864,261
(1,882,710)
—
179,464
654,866
$
(198,163)
(2,045,270)
1,956,239
2,488
(284,706)
1,809
3,314,590
(2,545,424)
(2,488)
768,487
$ (506,090) $ 1,318,909
98 Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 2015
In thousands
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables
Ore on leach pads
Inventory
Prepaid expenses and other
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment, net
Mining properties, net
Ore on leach pads
Restricted assets
Equity securities
Receivables
Deferred tax assets
Net investment in subsidiaries
Other
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable
Other accrued liabilities
Debt
Royalty obligations
Reclamation
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Debt
Royalty obligations
Reclamation
Deferred tax liabilities
Other long-term liabilities
Intercompany payable (receivable)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock
Coeur
Mining, Inc.
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations Consolidated
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
96,123
11
—
—
3,496
99,630
4,546
—
—
5,755
434
—
—
127,671
54,578
292,614
1,743
20,555
1,000
—
—
23,298
467,634
—
—
28,600
2,171
(650,565)
(152,160)
34,228
12,773
67,329
45,491
1,075
160,896
138,706
199,303
44,582
381
2,332
—
—
27,657
9,197
583,054
21,956
11,177
8,120
4,729
1,401
47,383
4,947
4,864
61,924
6,927
3,838
411,103
493,603
70,363
73,208
—
36,220
6,371
186,162
52,747
389,916
—
5,497
—
24,768
1,942
—
5,695
666,727
28,454
18,800
1,311
20,164
1,821
70,550
61,976
—
20,122
111,605
49,752
239,462
482,917
$
— $
—
—
—
—
—
200,714
85,992
67,329
81,711
10,942
446,688
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(155,328)
(54,578)
195,999
589,219
44,582
11,633
2,766
24,768
1,942
—
14,892
$ (209,906) $ 1,332,489
$
— $
—
—
—
(1,151)
(1,151)
(54,578)
—
1,151
—
—
—
(53,427)
52,153
50,532
10,431
24,893
2,071
140,080
479,979
4,864
83,197
147,132
55,761
—
770,933
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated deficit
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $
1,513
3,024,461
(2,600,776)
(3,722)
421,476
292,614
$
250
179,553
(135,049)
(2,686)
42,068
583,054
130,885
1,896,047
(1,913,672)
—
113,260
666,727
$
(131,135)
(2,075,600)
2,048,721
2,686
(155,328)
1,513
3,024,461
(2,600,776)
(3,722)
421,476
$ (209,906) $ 1,332,489
99 Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 21 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Labor Union Contract
The Company maintains a labor agreement with Sindicato de Trabajadores Mineros de la Empresa Manquiri S.A. at the
San Bartolomé mine in Bolivia. The San Bartolomé mine labor agreement, which became effective January 28, 2010, is currently
active and does not have a fixed term. At December 31, 2016, approximately 11% of the Company’s global labor force was covered
by this collective bargaining agreement. The Company cannot predict whether this agreement will be renewed on similar terms
or at all, whether future labor disruptions will occur or, if disruptions do occur, how long they will last.
Rochester Production Royalty
Commencing January 1, 2014, Coeur Rochester is obligated to pay a 3.4% net smelter returns royalty on up to 39.4
million silver equivalent ounces produced and sold from a portion of the Rochester mine, payable on a quarterly basis. For each
calendar quarter, the royalty is payable on the actual sales prices received (exclusive of gains or losses associated with trading
activities), less refining and related costs, of gold and silver produced and sold from the applicable portions of the Rochester mine.
Changes in the Company's mine plan and silver and gold prices result in the recognition of mark-to-market gains or losses in Fair
value adjustments, net. At December 31, 2016, a total of 18.0 million silver equivalent ounces remain outstanding under the
obligation.
Palmarejo Gold Production Royalty and Gold Stream
In January 2009, Coeur Mexicana entered into a gold production royalty agreement with a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada
Corporation under which the subsidiary of Franco-Nevada Corporation purchased a royalty covering 50% of the life of mine gold
to be produced from its Palmarejo silver and gold mine in Mexico (excluding production from the recently acquired Paramount
properties). The royalty agreement provided for a minimum obligation of 4,167 ounces per month over an initial eight-year period
for a total of 400,000 ounces of gold. On October 2, 2014, Coeur Mexicana terminated the Palmarejo gold production royalty in
exchange for a termination payment of $2.0 million. In July 2016, the remaining minimum obligation under the Palmarejo royalty
agreement was satisfied and the termination of the Palmarejo royalty agreement became effective.
Coeur Mexicana is now subject to a gold stream agreement whereby Coeur Mexicana will sell 50% of Palmarejo gold
production (excluding production from the recently acquired Paramount properties) to a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada Corporation
upon completion of the gold production royalty minimum ounce delivery requirement, for the lesser of $800 or spot price per
ounce. Under the gold stream agreement, Coeur Mexicana received a $22.0 million deposit toward future deliveries under the
gold stream agreement.
Sites Related to Callahan Mining Corporation
In 1991, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Callahan Mining Corporation. The Company has
received requests for information or notices of potential liability from state or federal agencies with regard to Callahan's operations
at sites in Maine, Colorado and Washington. The Company did not make any decisions with respect to generation, transport or
disposal of hazardous waste at these sites. Therefore, the Company believes that it is not liable for any potential cleanup costs
either directly as an operator or indirectly as a parent. The Company anticipates that further agency interaction may occur with
respect to these sites.
Callahan operated a mine and mill in Brooksville, Maine from 1968 until 1972 and subsequently disposed of the property.
In 2000, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, made a formal request to the Company for information regarding
the site. The site was placed on the National Priorities List on September 5, 2002, and the Maine Department of Transportation,
a partial owner of the property, signed a consent order in 2005. In January 2009, the EPA and the State of Maine made additional
formal requests to the Company for information relating to the site, to which the Company responded. The first phase of cleanup
at the site began in April 2011.
The Van Stone Mine in Stevens County, Washington consists of several parcels of land and was mined from 1926 until
1993 by multiple owners. Callahan sold its parcel in 1990. In February 2010, the State of Washington Department of Ecology
notified Callahan that it, among others, is a potentially liable person (PLP) under Washington law.
Under lease and option agreements with several owners, Callahan was involved with the Akron Mine located in Gunnison
County, Colorado from 1937-1960. The United States Forest Service (“USFS”) made formal requests for information to Callahan
regarding the site in December 2003, February 2007, March 2013, and November 2013. Callahan timely responded to each request.
In August 2014, Callahan received a notice of potential CERCLA liability from the USFS regarding environmental contamination
at the Akron Mine.
100
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Bolivian Temporary Restriction on Mining above 4,400 Meters
In October 2009, the Bolivian state-owned mining organization, COMIBOL, announced by resolution that it was
temporarily suspending mining activities above the elevation of 4,400 meters above sea level while stability studies of Cerro Rico
mountain are undertaken. The Company holds rights to mine above this elevation under valid contracts with COMIBOL. The
stability studies have been completed and officially submitted to the Bolivian mining technical authorities. Accordingly, the
COMIBOL suspension has expired in accordance with the terms of the resolution. The Company is not currently mining above
the 4,400 meter level due to community relations concerns and the current political climate in Bolivia.
If COMIBOL decides to affirmatively adopt a new resolution to restrict access above the 4,400 meter level, the Company
may need to further write down the carrying value of the asset. While a portion of the Company's proven and probable reserves
relate to material above the 4,400 meter level at San Bartolomé, so long as operations remain suspended, there is a risk that silver
may not be produced from this material at expected levels or at all, particularly given the remaining anticipated mine life of this
asset. It is also uncertain if any new mining or investment policies or shifts in political attitude may affect mining in Bolivia.
NOTE 22 – SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
The following table presents non-cash financing and investing activities and other cash flow information:
Non-cash financing and investing activities:
Capital lease obligations
Non-cash extinguishment of senior notes
Non-cash acquisitions and related deferred taxes
Other cash flow information:
Interest paid
Income taxes paid
Year ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
$
32,243
$
4,123
$
24,879
10,616
—
53,373
297,821
$
41,976
$
42,264
$
17,181
1,937
—
—
30,691
20,198
101
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following table sets forth a summary of the unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31,
2016 and 2015 (in thousands, except per share data):
2016
Revenues
Costs applicable to sales
Amortization
Exploration
Other operating expenses (General and administrative, Pre-
development, reclamation, and other, and Write-downs)
Net income (loss)
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Capital expenditures
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$ 148,387
$ 182,007
$ 176,247
$ 159,136
101,555
100,465
105,408
102,113
27,964
1,731
16,926
(20,396)
6,617
22,172
37,505
2,233
11,764
14,497
45,939
23,288
27,763
3,706
11,604
69,557
47,812
25,627
29,929
5,260
10,747
(8,306)
25,449
29,926
(0.03)
(0.03)
Basic net income (loss) per share
Diluted net income (loss) per share
$
$
(0.14) $
0.09
(0.14) $
0.09
$
$
0.43
0.42
$
$
2015
Revenues
Costs applicable to sales
Amortization
Exploration
Other operating expenses (General and administrative, Pre-
development, reclamation, and other, and Write-downs)(1)
Net income (loss)
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Capital expenditures
Basic net income (loss) per share
Diluted net income (loss) per share
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$ 152,956
$ 166,263
$ 162,552
$ 164,315
115,062
119,097
120,237
125,258
33,090
4,266
15,597
(33,287)
(3,449)
17,620
38,974
3,579
10,718
(16,677)
37,004
23,677
35,497
2,112
11,632
(14,219)
36,770
23,861
36,190
1,690
326,017
(303,000)
43,217
30,035
$
$
(0.32) $
(0.12) $
(0.11) $
(2.28)
(0.32) $
(0.12) $
(0.11) $
(2.28)
(1) The Company performed impairment testing of long-lived assets in the fourth quarter of 2015 and, based on the results of the impairment
testing, recorded a write-down of $313.3 million to long-lived assets.
102
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Coeur Mining, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Not applicable.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required
to be disclosed by it in its periodic reports filed with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the
Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Based on an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures conducted by the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, such officers concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures were effective and operating at a reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2016.
(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 defines internal control over financial reporting in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and
effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
•
•
•
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the Company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being
made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of
the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Based upon
its assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
was effective.
The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 has been audited by Grant Thornton
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed
fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.
Other Information
None.
103
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
PART III
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information called for by this item regarding directors is hereby
incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A, or an amendment hereto, to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered
by this report under the captions “Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors”, “Executive Officers”, “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” and “Audit Committee
Report”.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A, or an amendment hereto, to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report
under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “2016 Summary Compensation Table,” “2016 Grants of Plan-Based
Awards,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Year End,” “2016 Option Exercises and Stock Vested,” “Pension Benefits and
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation,” “Director Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report.”
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, certain information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A, or an amendment hereto, to be not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report under
the caption “Share Ownership.”
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2016 regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans.
Plan category
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
Total
Number of shares to
be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Weighted-average
exercise
price of outstanding
options,
warrants and rights
(a)
(b)
656,611
—
656,611
$
$
10.76
—
10.76
Number of shares
remaining
available for future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a) (1)
(c)
3,303,388
—
3,303,388
(1) Amounts include 2,372,632 performance shares that cliff vest three years after the date of grant if certain market and performance criteria are met, if
the recipient remains an employee of the Company and subject to approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A, or an amendment hereto, to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report
under the captions “Related Person Transactions”, “Committees of the Board of Directors and Attendance”, and “Director
Independence”.
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A, or an amendment hereto, to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report
under the captions “Audit and Non-Audit Fees” and “Audit Committee Policies and Procedures for Pre-Approval of Independent
Auditor Services.”
104
Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
PART IV
(a) The Company's consolidated financial statements and notes, together with the report thereon of Grant Thornton LLP dated
February 8, 2017, are included herein as part of Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data above.
(b) The following listed documents are filed as Exhibits to this report:
2.1
2.2
2.3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 16, 2014, among the Registration, Hollywood Merger Sub,
Inc., Paramount Gold and Silver Corp. and Paramount Nevada Gold Corp. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 18, 2014 (File No. 001-08641)).
Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 3, 2015, among Coeur Mining, Inc., Hollywood
Merger Sub, Inc., Paramount Gold and Silver Corp. and Paramount Nevada Gold Corp. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2015 (File No. 001-08641)).
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 12, 2015, among Coeur Mining, Inc. and Goldcorp America Holdings
Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January
13, 2015 (File No. 001-08641)).
Delaware Certificate of Conversion of the Registrant, effective as of May 16, 2013 (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K12B filed on May 16, 2013 (File No. 001-08641)).
Delaware Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, effective as of May 16, 2013 (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K12B filed on May 16, 2013 (File No. 001-08641)).
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, effective as of May 12, 2015 (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 13, 2015 (File No.
333-204142)).
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, effective December 13, 2016 (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2016 (File No. 001-08641)).
Warrant Agreement dated as of April 16, 2013, by and among the Registrant, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
and Computershare, Inc., as Warrant Agent (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 16, 2013 (File No. 001-08641)).
Form of Common Stock Share Certificate of the Registrant. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K12B filed on May 16, 2013 (File No. 001-08641)).
Form of Warrant Certificate of the Registrant (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K12B filed on May 16, 2013 (File No. 001-08641)).
Indenture, dated January 29, 2013, among the Registrant, as issuer, certain subsidiaries of the Registrant, as guarantors
thereto, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (File No. 001-08641)).
First Supplemental Indenture, dated December 16, 2013, among the Registrant, as issuer, certain subsidiaries of the
Registrant, as guarantors thereto, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (Filed herewith).
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2014, among Coeur Mining, Inc., as issuer, certain subsidiaries
of Coeur Mining, Inc., as guarantors thereto, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2014 (File No. 001-08641))
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated April 14, 2015, among Coeur Mining, Inc., as issuer, certain subsidiaries of
Coeur Mining, Inc., as guarantors thereto, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 4, 2015 (File No. 001-08641)).
401k Plan of the Registrant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(pp) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form
10-K filed on March 29, 1995 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Amended and Restated 2005 Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Incentive Plan, as amended for the Registrant’s reverse
stock split. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
on February 26, 2010 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Amended Mining Lease, effective as of August 5, 2005, between Hyak Mining Company, Inc. and Coeur Alaska,
Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on
August 12, 2005 (File No. 001-08641)).
Amended and Restated Silver Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated March 28, 2006, between CDE Australia Pty
Limited and Cobar Operations Pty Limited (Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for
confidential treatment.) (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q filed on May 9, 2006 (File No. 001-08641)).
Supplemental Agreement in respect of the Amended and Restated Silver Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated January
29, 2008, between CDE Australia Pty Limited and Cobar Operations Pty Limited (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(cc) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 29, 2008 (File No. 001-08641)).
105 10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.15
10.16
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
10.24
10.25
10.26
10.27
10.28
10.29
10.30
10.31
10.32
12
21
23.1
23.2
31.1
31.2
32.1
Offer letter dated February 4, 2013 from the Registrant to Frank L. Hanagarne, Jr. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2013 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Offer letter dated February 4, 2013 from the Registrant to Peter Mitchell (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 8, 2013 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Form of Indemnification Agreement (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on May 16, 2013 (File No. 001-08641)).
Amended and Restated Executive Severance Policy of the Registrant (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.21 to the Registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 filed on September 23, 2013 (Reg. No. 333-191133)).*
Offer letter dated February 15, 2013 from the Registrant to Casey M. Nault. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 7, 2014 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Supplemental Incentive Agreement dated July 30, 2014 between the Registrant and Mitchell J. Krebs. (Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2014 (File
No. 001-08641)).*
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated July 30, 2014 between the Registration and Mitchell J. Krebs.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August
1, 2014 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Credit Agreement, dated March 31, 2015, by and between Coeur Mining, Inc. and The Bank of Nova Scotia
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 2,
2015 (File No. 001-08641)).
Credit Agreement, dated June 23, 2015, by and between Coeur Mining, Inc., certain subsidiaries of Coeur Mining,
Inc., as guarantors, the lenders party thereto and Barclays Bank plc, as administrative agent. (Incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 25, 2015 (File No.
001-08641)).
Consent under Credit Agreement dated November 2, 2015 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 2, 2015 (File No. 001-08641)).
Coeur Mining, Inc. 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 13, 2015 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 4, 2015 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 4, 2015 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 4, 2015 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Form of Performance Share Agreement (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 4, 2015 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Form of Cash-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights Award Agreement (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 4, 2015 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Form of Performance Unit Agreement (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 4, 2015 (File No. 001-08641)).*
Separation and Release of Claims Agreement dated January 21, 2016, between Coeur Mining, Inc. and Keagan J.
Kerr (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
January 22, 2016 (File. No. 001-08641)).*
Professional Services Agreement effective February 1, 2016, between Coeur Mining, Inc. and Keagan J. Kerr
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January
22, 2016 (File. No. 001-08641)).*
Annual Incentive Plan Summary of the Registrant (Filed herewith).*
Officer Severance Policy of the Registrant (Filed herewith).*
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan of the Registrant (Filed herewith).*
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. (Filed herewith).
List of subsidiaries of the Registrant. (Filed herewith).
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Filed herewith).
Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Filed herewith).
Certification of the CEO (Filed herewith).
Certification of the CFO (Filed herewith).
CEO Section 1350 Certification (Filed herewith).
106 32.2
95.1
CFO Section 1350 Certification (Filed herewith).
Mine Safety Disclosure (Filed herewith).
101.INS XBRL Instance Document**
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema**
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase**
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase**
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase**
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase**
*
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
The following financial information from Coeur Mining, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
**
December 31, 2016, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income (Loss), Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Consolidated Balance Sheets, and Consolidated Statement of Changes
in Stockholders' Equity
Item 16.
Form 10-K Summary
None.
107 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
COEUR MINING, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: February 8, 2017
By:
/s/ Mitchell J. Krebs
Mitchell J. Krebs
(Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ Mitchell J. Krebs______________________
Mitchell J. Krebs
Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 8, 2017
/s/ Peter C. Mitchell______________________
Peter C. Mitchell
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 8, 2017
/s/ Mark Spurbeck_______________________
Mark Spurbeck
Vice President, Finance
(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 8, 2017
/s/ Linda L. Adamany_____________________
Linda L. Adamany
/s/ Kevin S. Crutchfield___________________
Kevin S. Crutchfield
/s/ Sebastian Edwards_____________________
Sebastian Edwards
/s/ Randolph E. Gress_____________________
Randolph E. Gress
/s/ Robert E. Mellor______________________
Robert E. Mellor
/s/ John H. Robinson______________________
John H. Robinson
/s/ J. Kenneth Thompson___________________
J. Kenneth Thompson
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
February 8, 2017
February 8, 2017
February 8, 2017
February 8, 2017
February 8, 2017
February 8, 2017
February 8, 2017
108
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Rule 13a-14(a)
or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
1
Exhibit 31.1
I, Mitchell J. Krebs, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Coeur Mining, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under the Company's supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to
be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report the
Company's conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on the Company's most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and
(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
By:
/s/ Mitchell J. Krebs
Mitchell J. Krebs
Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 8, 2017
1. Coeur filed Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on
February 10, 2017 to amend Coeur's Annual Report on 10-K filed with the Commission on February 9, 2017 for the sole
purpose of amending the report prepared by KPMG LLP (the “Audit Report”) contained in Item 8 of the Form 10-K to
correct a typographical error in the date of the Audit Report from February 8, 2017 to February 10, 2016.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Rule 13a-14(a)
or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
1
Exhibit 31.2
I, Peter C. Mitchell, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Coeur Mining, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under the Company's supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
(c)
(d)
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report the
Company's conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on the Company's most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and
(b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
By: /s/ Peter C. Mitchell
Peter C. Mitchell
Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 8, 2017
1. Coeur filed Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on
February 10, 2017 to amend Coeur's Annual Report on 10-K filed with the Commission on February 9, 2017 for the sole
purpose of amending the report prepared by KPMG LLP (the “Audit Report”) contained in Item 8 of the Form 10-K to
correct a typographical error in the date of the Audit Report from February 8, 2017 to February 10, 2016.
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
1
Exhibit 32.1
Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Coeur Mining, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify,
based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Mitchell J. Krebs
Mitchell J. Krebs
February 8, 2017
1. Coeur filed Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on
February 10, 2017 to amend Coeur's Annual Report on 10-K filed with the Commission on February 9, 2017 for the sole
purpose of amending the report prepared by KPMG LLP (the “Audit Report”) contained in Item 8 of the Form 10-K to
correct a typographical error in the date of the Audit Report from February 8, 2017 to February 10, 2016.
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
1
Exhibit 32.2
Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Coeur Mining, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
/s/ Peter C. Mitchell
Peter C. Mitchell
February 8, 2017
1. Coeur filed Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on
February 10, 2017 to amend Coeur's Annual Report on 10-K filed with the Commission on February 9, 2017 for the sole
purpose of amending the report prepared by KPMG LLP (the “Audit Report”) contained in Item 8 of the Form 10-K to
correct a typographical error in the date of the Audit Report from February 8, 2017 to February 10, 2016.
Stockholder Information
Corporate
Information
Coeur Mining, Inc.
104 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60603
+1 (312) 489-5800
www.coeur.com
Stockholder Inquiries
Please direct inquiries, stockholder requests
for assistance, and copies of Coeur’s Annual
Report or SEC Form 10-K to:
Courtney R. B. Lynn
Vice President, Investor Relations & Treasurer
+1 (312) 489-5837
clynn@coeur.com
For current news releases and Company news,
visit the Coeur website at www.coeur.com
Share Price
The Company’s Common Stock is listed on
the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”).
The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the high and low closing prices of
the Common Stock as reported by the NYSE.
2016 High
Low
1Q
2Q
3Q
4Q
$5.80
$10.66
$15.98
$11.81
$1.73
$5.55
$11.26
$8.72
AISC per 70:1 Spot Silver Equivalent Ounce for 2017 Guidance
AISC per 70:1 Spot S ilver Equivalent O unce for 2017 Guidance
Transfer Agent and
Registrar Common Stock
Questions on dividends, stock transfers or
issuance of certificates, and IRS 1099 should
be directed to Coeur’s transfer agent:
Computershare
P.O. Box 30170
College Station, TX 77842-3170
+1 (800) 359-8554
www.computershare.com/investor
To submit an online inquiry, visit
www-us.computershare.com/investor/contact
Palmarejo
Rochester
Silver
San Bartolomé
Endeavor
Total
Kensington
Gold
Wharf
Total
Total
$211,000
69,200
141,800
15,380,000
-
$102,000
18,500
83,500
5,900,000
-
$9.00 - $9.50 $10.50 - $11.00 $14.00 - $14.50
$108,380
19,860
88,520
8,160,000
-
($ thousands except per ounce amounts)
Costs applicable to sales, including amortization
(U.S. GAAP)
Amortization
Costs applicable to sales
Silver equivalent ounces sold
Gold equivalent ounces sold
Costs applicable to sales per ounce
Costs applicable to sales
Treatment and refining costs
Sustaining capital, including capital lease payments
General and administrative
Exploration
Reclamation
Project/pre-development costs
All-in sustaining costs
Silver equivalent ounces sold
Kensington and Wharf silver equivalent ounces sold
Consolidated silver equivalent ounces sold
All-in sustaining costs per silver equivalent ounce guidance
$3,750
-
3,750
380,000
-
-
$425,130
107,560
317,570
29,820,000
-
-
$130,500
29,100
101,400
-
124,000
$800 - $850
$83,800
11,500
72,300
-
90,000
$775 - $825
$214,300
40,600
173,700
-
214,000
-
$639,430
148,160
491,270
44,800,000
-
-
$491,270
4,300
88,000
30,000
24,000
14,000
5,700
$657,270
29,820,000
14,980,000
44,800,000
$14.25 - $14.75
Cautionary Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of securities legislation in the United States and Canada, including statements regarding strategies to become a
lower-cost, high-quality, profitable precious metals producer, growth, cash flow, costs, expansion, exploration, development, liquidity, mining rates, production, interest savings, balance
sheet flexibility and mine lives. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause Coeur’s actual results, performance
or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among
others the risks and hazards inherent in the mining business (including risks inherent in developing large-scale mining projects, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, weather or
geologically related conditions), changes in the market prices of gold and silver and a sustained lower price environment, the uncertainties inherent in Coeur’s production, exploratory and
developmental activities, including risks relating to permitting and regulatory delays, ground conditions, grade variability, any future labor disputes or work stoppages, the uncertainties
inherent in the estimation of gold and silver ore reserves, changes that could result from Coeur’s future acquisition of new mining properties or businesses, reliance on third parties
to operate certain mines where Coeur owns silver production and reserves and the absence of control over mining operations in which Coeur or its subsidiaries hold royalty or streaming
interests and risks related to these mining operations including results of mining and exploration activities, environmental, economic and political risks of the jurisdiction in which the
mining operations are located, the loss of any third-party smelter to which Coeur markets silver and gold, the effects of environmental and other governmental regulations, the risks
inherent in the ownership or operation of or investment in mining properties or businesses in foreign countries, Coeur’s ability to raise additional financing necessary to conduct its
business, make payments or refinance its debt, as well as other uncertainties and risk factors set out in filings made from time to time with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, and Canadian securities regulators, including, without limitation, Coeur’s most recent report on Form 10-K. Actual results, developments and timetables could vary
significantly from the estimates presented. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Coeur disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly
such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Additionally, Coeur undertakes no obligation to comment on analyses, expectations
or statements made by third parties in respect of Coeur, its financial or operating results or its securities.
Coeur Mining | 2016 Annual Report
Coeur Mining, Inc.
104 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60603
+1 (312) 489-5800
www.coeur.com
NYSE: CDE