Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Shell Companies / Cool Company

Cool Company

cool · NASDAQ Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker cool
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Financial Services
Industry Shell Companies
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2019 Annual Report · Cool Company
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

[X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

FORM 10-K

[  ]

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019

OR

For the Transition Period from _________________________

Commission File No. 000-51128

POLARITYTE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)

06-1529524
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

123 Wright Brothers Drive
Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
(Address of principal executive office)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (800) 560-3983

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Common Stock, par value $0.001
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights

Trading Symbol(s)
PTE

Name of each exchange on which registered
NASDAQ Capital Market
NASDAQ Capital Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and, (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  has  submitted  electronically  every  Interactive  Data  File  required  to  be  submitted  pursuant  to  Rule  405  of  Regulation  S-T  (§
232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  is  a  large  accelerated  filer,  an  accelerated  filer,  a  non-accelerated  filer,  a  smaller  reporting  company,  or  an  emerging  growth
company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer

[  ]
[  ]

Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

[X]
[X]
[  ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2019, was $79,393,237.

The outstanding number of shares of common stock as of March 6, 2020, was 38,358,450.

Documents incorporated by reference: None.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
PART II
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
PART IV
Item 15.

Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Page

4
21
42
43
43
44

44
44
44
54
54
54
54
58

58
63
71
73
73

75

As  used  in  this  report,  the  terms  “we”,  “us”,  “our”,  “the  Company”,  and  “PolarityTE”  mean  PolarityTE,  Inc.,  a  Delaware  corporation,  and  our  wholly  owned  Nevada
subsidiaries (direct and indirect), PolarityTE, Inc., PolarityTE MD, Inc., Arches Research, Inc., Utah CRO Services, Inc., IBEX Preclinical Research, Inc., and IBEX Property
LLC., unless otherwise indicated or required by the context.

POLARITYTE,  the  PolarityTE  Logo,  POLARITYRD,  POLARITYIS,  POLARITYRX,  WELCOME  TO  THE  SHIFT,  WHERE  SELF  REGENERATES  SELF,  COMPLEX
SIMPLICITY, IBEX, SKINTE, OSTEOTE, CARTTE, ADIPOTE, MYOTE, NEURALTE, ANGIOTE, LIVERTE, UROTE, and BOWELTE are all trademarks or registered
trademarks of PolarityTE. Solely for convenience, the trademarks and trade names in this report may be referred to without the ® and ™ symbols, but such references should
not be construed as any indicator that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights thereto.

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Forward-looking Statements

This  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  contains  forward-looking  statements.  Risks  and  uncertainties  are  inherent  in  forward-looking  statements.  Furthermore,  such
statements  may  be  based  on  assumptions  that  fail  to  materialize  or  prove  incorrect.  Consequently,  our  business  development,  operations,  and  results  could  differ  materially
from those expressed in forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report. We make such forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Annual Report are forward-
looking  statements.  In  some  cases,  you  can  identify  forward-looking  statements  by  words  such  as  “anticipate,”  “believe,”  “contemplate,”  “continue,”  “could,”  “estimate,”
“expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “would,” or the negative of these words or other comparable terminology. These
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●

the initiation, timing, progress, and results of our research and development programs;
the timing or success of commercialization of our products;
the pricing and reimbursement of our products;
the initiation, timing, progress, and results of our preclinical and clinical studies;
the scope of protection we can establish and maintain for intellectual property rights covering our product candidates and technology;
estimates of our expenses, future revenues, and capital requirements;
our need for, and ability to obtain, additional financing in the future;
our ability to comply with regulations applicable to the manufacture, marketing, sale and distribution of our products;
the potential benefits of strategic collaboration agreements and our ability to enter into strategic arrangements;
developments relating to our competitors and industry; and
other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Given the known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from
any  future  results,  performance,  or  achievements  expressed  or  implied  by  our  forward-looking  statements,  you  should  not  place  undue  reliance  on  these  forward-looking
statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available
in the future.

This Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  also  contains  estimates,  projections  and  other  information  concerning  our  industry,  our  business,  and  the  markets  for  certain
diseases, including data regarding the estimated size of those markets, and the incidence and prevalence of certain medical conditions. Information that is based on estimates,
forecasts, projections, market research, or similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties, and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and
circumstances reflected in this information. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this industry, business, market and other data from reports, research surveys, studies
and similar data prepared by market research firms and other third parties, industry, medical and general publications, government data and similar sources.

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Item 1. Business

Overview

PolarityTE, Inc., headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, is a biotechnology company developing and commercializing regenerative tissue products and biomaterials.
Our regenerative SkinTE product is commercially available for the repair, reconstruction, replacement, and supplementation of skin in patients who have a need for treatment of
acute or chronic wounds, burns, surgical reconstruction events, scar revision, or removal of dysfunctional skin grafts. We intend to continue to focus on the SkinTE product
offering and to enhance that offering with the development of SkinTE Cryo and other products.

Our Goals and Objectives

We aspire to deliver products from our platform technologies that provide superior results to patients, while reducing costs and promoting improved health economics
for patients, providers, and payors. During the past three years we pursued the attainment of that goal through the development and commercialization of SkinTE. Our current
plan is to:

●

Expand the  commercial  sales  team  and  increase  productivity  through  improved  hiring  and  training  and  by  executing  on  a  clearly  defined sales  and  marketing
strategy;
Focus on positioning SkinTE for broader adoption as an established treatment for specific wounds;

●
● Complete the clinical trials we have in process;
● Continue development of SkinTE Cryo and other products; and
●

to pursue strategic relationships that enhance our technology offerings through joint development or licensing arrangements or acquisitions.

SkinTE

The Importance of Skin

Skin has several functions. It provides a barrier to water loss and pathogens and protects against diverse forms of trauma, including thermal, chemical and ultraviolet
radiation. Skin keeps us in touch with our environment through a host of nerve endings, regulates body temperature and enhances metabolic functions, as well as synthesizing
vitamin D.

●

●

The importance of the skin as a barrier is illustrated by the mortality associated with large surface area burns, where increased transepidermal water loss culminates
in dehydration, renal failure and shock.
Skin is an active immune organ, and dysfunctional innate defenses have significant clinical implications. Products of the stratum corneum, including free fatty acids,
polar  lipids,  and  glycosphingolipids  accumulate  in  the  intercellular  spaces  and  horny layer,  exhibiting  antimicrobial  properties,  and  functioning  as  a  first  line  of
defense. Antimicrobial  peptides  exhibit  potent and targeted resistance against a wide spectrum of common pathogens, and when this barrier is breached, second
lines of protection are provided by an inflammatory cascade in the subepithelial tissue.

● Biosynthesis of melanin involves a complex pathway that occurs in melanocytes, within membrane-bound organelles called melanosomes. Melanocytes are present
in  the  basal  and  suprabasal  layers  of  the  skin  and  in  the  hair  follicles  and  transfer  melanosomes  through  dendritic processes  where  they  form  melanin  caps  that
reduce the harmful effects of ultraviolet light.
The skin is a ready source of vitamin D following sun exposure. It is a fat-soluble prohormone steroid primarily acknowledged for its endocrine role in calcium
homeostasis maintaining levels of serum calcium through control of calcium and phosphate absorption from the intestine, and resorption of bone.
The skin controls body temperature. The underlying adipose tissue insulates against conductive heat loss, whereas loss of heat is facilitated actively by evaporation
of sweat from the skin surface and by increased blood flow through the rich vascular network of the dermis.

●

●

4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  clinical  significance  of  skin  is  illustrated  by  the  morbidity  associated  with  burns  and  cutaneous  defects. According  to  statistics  collected  by  the  Nation  Burn
Repository, the mortality rate from 2008 to 2017 among burn patients treated at surveyed burn centers is approximately 3%. A 12-month prospective observational study of
diabetic foot ulcers first published in October 2017 reported that out of a group of 299 patients, 17.4% had some sort of amputation of the foot and 6.0% of the 299 patients
underwent revascularization surgery. A report published on Medscape in June 2018 states that pressure injuries are listed as the direct cause of death in 7-8% of all patients with
paraplegia. We believe that the regeneration of full-thickness skin with all the processes and appendages that enable it to perform its vital functions is critical to long-term,
positive patient outcomes following serious skin injury.

Limitations of Other Skin Treatment Therapies

Current clinical standards and practice adhere to the concept that skin should be replaced with skin whenever possible in settings where patients have suffered the loss
of such tissue. Understanding this, medical professionals are left with a decision to attempt to temporize a wound bed with an autograft (using the patient’s own skin in a skin
graft),  an  allograft  (using  human  skin  from  a  donor),  or  a  variety  of  skin  substitutes  to  provide  a  skin-like  barrier  while  the  margin  of  the  wound  heals  through  secondary
intention and contraction. Historically, harvest and placement of autologous full-thickness skin results in the best outcome within wound beds because it most closely resembles
the full-thickness skin that was lost. However, full-thickness harvest of skin also results in a full-thickness skin defect at the donor site, which requires primary closure (skin
edge approximation and suturing) so as not to leave a gaping wound behind. Because of this absolute limit on how much autologous full-thickness donor skin can be harvested
without leaving behind a non-closable wound, medical professionals can only harvest small, elliptically shaped pieces of such skin from areas of redundancy, which is termed
full-thickness skin graft (FTSG).

It  is  because  there  remains  only  a  finite  supply  of  FTSG  donor  material  and  sites  that  medical  professionals  often  rely  on  the  harvest  of  split-thickness  skin  grafts
(STSG) for coverage of voids of the integument to get better coverage and more skin. STSGs, however, do not represent the true anatomy or function of native skin because
such  graft  harvest  procedures  commonly  take  the  top  1/10,000th  of  an  inch  of  the  patient’s  own  skin  and  therefore  do  not  capture  all  the  necessary  cellular  and  tissue
components and structures required for the regeneration of normal skin.

After the failure to harvest all the necessary skin structures and components from the STSG donor site, the patient is left with an incomplete top layer of skin covering
the  initial  defect  (recipient  site)  and  a  remaining  bottom  layer  at  the  donor  site.  In  this  setting,  both  donor  and  recipient  sites  contain  incomplete  skin,  which  results  in
dysfunctional, painful scar tissues and lifelong morbidities.

Because of the limits of STSG and FTSG and the type of procedures required for such harvests, the industry has continued to investigate skin substitutes and skin
alternatives that can be used in place of native cutaneous substrate. Among these alternatives or options are a cultured epithelial autograft (a form of manipulated autograft),
allograft (tissue grafts derived from a donor of the same species as the recipient but not genetically identical), xenograft (a tissue graft or organ transplant from a donor of a
different species from the recipient), and engineered skin substitutes. None of these substitutes have been able to regenerate the cutaneous appendages (e.g., hair follicle, sweat
gland, sebaceous glands, etc.), which are necessary for the development of full-thickness, normal skin.

5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our Solution - SkinTE

Many organs have a series of layered interfaces: an avascular cellular epithelium that spontaneously regenerates, a basement membrane zone, and stroma or vascular
supporting connective tissue that does not regenerate. In skin, these layers are referred to as an epidermis of stratified squamous epithelium and a fibrous neurovascular dermis,
which rests on a hypodermis or subcutaneous fat. We believe there is something powerful, reactive, and dynamic controlling regeneration of tissues such as skin, which is the
interactome, the whole set of interactions a cell is impacted by, both intra and extra-cellularly. Cells rarely act on their own to create functional repair or regeneration; instead,
tissues have functionally organized cellular aggregates called appendages, which run, and even regenerate, the composite tissues they are a part of when altered, stimulated, and
processed in certain ways.

The core technology of SkinTE is minimally polarized functional units (“MPFUs”). MPFUs are multi-cellular micro-aggregates that act as an intrinsic, regenerative
bio-reactor capable of expanding, proliferating, and synthesizing cells, materials, factors, and systems necessary for regenerating full-thickness, three-dimensional tissue. In the
application of SkinTE to date we have been able, when applicable to a particular case, to collect from a patient a skin tissue sample 5 cm2 in size or less and produce enough
SkinTE  to  treat  a  wound  30x  greater  in  size  than  the  skin  collected.  SkinTE  allows  the  patient  to  regenerate  full-thickness,  three-dimensional  skin  (similar  to  a  FTSG)  by
contributing a much smaller skin sample, while reducing the scarring and morbidities associated with STSGs, and producing results we believe to be superior to STSGs and
synthetic skin substitutes.

SkinTE can be utilized by a variety of health care providers in an operating room, wound clinic, or doctor’s office. When a new health care facility or practice begins
using  our  SkinTE  product,  we  ship  harvest  boxes  to  the  facility  so  that  the  procedure  for  treating  a  patient  with  SkinTE  can  begin  immediately  when  the  need  arises.  Each
harvest  box  includes  a  container  for  the  skin  sample  collected,  labels  for  shipping  the  sample  to  our  facility,  and  a  temperature-controlled  shipping  box  that  maintains  an
appropriate environment for the sample as it is delivered to our FDA regulated biomedical manufacturing facility.

The harvested skin is used in its entirety to manufacture SkinTE, which is returned for application to the patient’s wound as early as 48 hours after harvest and is viable
for use up to 14 days after harvest. Processing of the skin creates cellular micro-aggregates that are optimized for grafting and expansion, which retain the progenitor cells within
the hair follicles. The product is not cultured or expanded ex-vivo, and no enzymes, growth factors, or serum derivatives are utilized during manufacturing. The final product,
SkinTE, is delivered in a syringe and has the consistency of a paste. Following wound bed preparation, SkinTE is spread evenly across the entire surface of the wound and
adheres (or “takes”) to the wound in a similar manner to traditional skin grafts. Once integrated with the wound bed, the product expands and regenerates full-thickness skin
across the entire surface.

SkinTE  was  registered  with  the  United  States  Food  and  Drug Administration  (FDA)  in August  2017,  and  is  commercially  available  for  the  repair,  reconstruction,
replacement, and regeneration of skin in patients who have a need for treatment of acute or chronic wounds, burns, surgical reconstruction events, scar revision, or removal of
dysfunctional skin grafts.

6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Clinical Trials

Burns and Traumatic Wounds

We initiated a head-to-head trial comparing SkinTE to the STSG, the clinical standard of care, in the first quarter of 2018. Eight patients were enrolled in the trial and
the  primary  endpoint  for  the  trial  is  graft  take.  The  results  of  the  interim  analysis  were  accepted  for  a  podium  presentation  at  the American  Burn Association  52 nd Annual
Meeting that was scheduled to begin March 17, 2020, but the meeting was canceled as a coronavirus preventative measure and we have not received any word on rescheduling.
We continue to accumulate clinical results on non-trial patients from our commercial sales of SkinTE for various indications, including acute burn, burn reconstruction, surgical
reconstruction, scar revision, and chronic wounds. Some of these cases have been presented independently by, or in collaboration with, providers at national conferences, such
as the American Society of Plastic Surgery – The Meeting in September 2019.

Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) Trials

DFUs  are  chronic  wounds  and  represent  one  of  the  most  costly  and  medically  significant  health  related  morbidities  encountered  during  a  patient’s  lifetime.  The
estimated  annual  US  payor  burden  of  DFU  ranges  from  $9.1  billion  to  $13.2  billion  according  to  a  2014  article  in Diabetes Care,  a  publication  of  the American  Diabetes
Association. The outpatient management of diabetic foot ulcers represents the major contributing cost to the health care system. Inadequate assessment and management with
chronicity of treatment is one of the primary cost drivers and failures of care.

SkinTE was used to treat 10 patients (11 DFUs) in a pilot trial completed in June 2019, and first reported at the Symposium on Advanced Wound Care Fall 2019. The

following are the results as determined by independent review:

10 of 11 (90.9%) DFUs healed within eight weeks of a single application of SkinTE

●
● Median time to closure was 25 days
● DFU sizes ranged from 1.0 to 21.7 cm2
● One patient was removed from the study at week three due to adverse events not related to the study or SkinTE procedure
● No SkinTE-related adverse reactions were observed

We are now engaged in a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating SkinTE versus standard of care in treatment of DFU. The size of the study is 102 patients
and the trial is actively enrolling patients. The primary endpoint is percentage of ulcers closed at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints include quality of life, return of function, pain,
and cost-effectiveness. We are hopeful that we will have initial data from the trial that we can make public in the second quarter of 2020.

Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) Trials

VLUs are a type of chronic wound and constitute a significant burden on the worldwide health care system and are often refractory to treatment. Up to one-third of

treated patients experience four or more episodes of recurrence. Delivering all the elements of native skin can potentially reduce the recurrence rate.

7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SkinTE was used to treat 10 patients in a pilot trial completed in September 2019, and first reported at the Symposium on Advanced Wound Care Fall 2019, where we

received recognition as Best Abstract. The following are the results as determined by independent review:

8 of 10 (80%) VLUs closed within 12 weeks of a single application of SkinTE

●
● Of the two VLUs not deemed closed within 12 weeks: one VLU was the largest in the study (12.2cm2), and closed within 13.5 weeks post a single application of
SkinTE;  one  VLU  was  previously  deemed  closed,  and  reopened  prior  to  the  two-week  durability visit  as  a  result  of  external  factors  unrelated  to  the  SkinTE
procedure

● Median time to closure was 21 days
● No SkinTE-related adverse reactions were observed

We are now engaged in a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating SkinTE versus standard of care in treatment of VLU. The size of the study is 102 patients
and  the  trial  is  actively  enrolling  patients.  Secondary  endpoints  include  quality  of  life,  return  of  function,  pain,  and  cost-effectiveness. An  interim  analysis  is  planned  at  50
patients, and based on current enrollment we are hopeful this analysis may be available in the second half of 2020.

Market Opportunity

The primary markets for SkinTE are chronic wounds (including DFUs, VLUs, and pressure ulcers), burn wounds, wounds from surgical procedures, and wounds from

traumatic injury.

●

●

The American  Burn  Association  reported  the  estimated  number  of  burn  injuries  in  2016  was  486,000,  and  that  approximately  40,000 of  these  resulted  in
hospitalization.
The Centers for Disease Control reported in 2017 there are approximately 30.3 million diabetes sufferers in the United States. The American Diabetes Association
report on the economic costs of diabetes in 2017 states that the direct medical cost of diabetes in that year was $237 billion. A 2005 article estimated the number of
DFUs at between 1.2 and 3.0 million, and a 2003 article estimated the prevalence of unhealed DFUs after 12 weeks of conventional treatment at between 1.0 and
2.5 million. The estimated annual US payor burden of DFU ranges from $9.1 billion to $13.2 billion according to a 2014 article in Diabetes Care.

● A 2010 article reports the prevalence of venous ulcers at approximately 600,000 annually, and a subsequent 2014 article reports that on average between 33% and
66% of these ulcers persist for six weeks and are, therefore, referred to as chronic, resulting in approximately 200-360 thousand patients per year that we believe
would be potential candidates for treatment with SkinTE.
Pressure Ulcers are common in hospital systems, increase patient morbidity and mortality, and are costly for patients and the healthcare  system. According to the
Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) there are more than 2.5 million individuals that develop pressure ulcers annually, and approximately 600-700
thousand  people  are  admitted  to  hospitals  with  one  or  more  pressure ulcers.  Of  these  ulcers,  approximately  77%  are  treated  with  both  topical  therapies  and
excisional surgical debridement.

●

● We believe SkinTE is suitable for treating a number of acute wounds. In 2017 the results of a 2010 survey were published showing approximately  11.4  million
musculoskeletal and integumentary in-patient surgeries occurred during the survey year, and the inpatient traumatic injury rate was 524.3 persons for every 100,000
people.  A  2015  study  reports  the  incidence  of  surgical  wound  dehiscence  following  different  surgical  procedures  ranges  between  1.3%  and  9.3%.  Of  those
dehiscence  occurrences,  a 2017 article recites the results of a survey of 187 patients with surgical wounds healing by secondary intention showing 77, or 41.2%,
were wounds that had dehisced.

8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selling SkinTE

In 2018, we completed the first two stages of our SkinTE commercial roll-out strategy. The first was the limited market release phase, which focused on generating use
by  early  adopters,  often  in  the  context  of  product  evaluations,  with  the  goal  of  securing  clinical  data  and  experience  to  prepare  the  organization  and  product  for  a  broader
commercial release. The second stage was the regional market release that began in late October 2018 with initial build out of our commercial organization. In 2019, we pushed
to grow our SkinTE sales by increasing market awareness, positioning SkinTE for broader adoption as the treatment for specific wounds, and improving the productivity of our
sales team by selective additional hiring and optimized training. We ended 2019 with approximately 25 salespeople and 10 clinical science staff that support the sales team.

We  have  observed  that  the  sales  process  is  affected  by  several  factors,  including  the  receptiveness  of  the  physician  to  consider  and  then  adopt  a  new  therapeutic
approach, facility administrative approval where required, the nature and type of wounds treated at a target account, and the incidence of wound care cases at target accounts.
We also believe that the previous lack of SkinTE clinical trials, which we were not required to obtain before commercialization as a 361 HCT/P, has adversely affected the
willingness of healthcare providers to use SkinTE.

In the hospital and large facility setting we begin the sales process with introductions to physicians whose patients may benefit from SkinTE. After a physician in the
system is willing to use the product, the hospital or large facility usually requires an assessment by its Value Analysis Committee (VAC) prior to commencing commercial
SkinTE use. This can be a formal and lengthy administrative process, and our experience shows the length of the process varies widely from one customer to the next. In some
cases, the physician seeking to use our product can complete a product evaluation during the VAC process, but in others the test trial must wait until VAC approval. After VAC
approval and any product evaluations are complete, we negotiate the terms of a final purchase agreement.

In clinics and smaller facility operations there is often no VAC and related approval process. The salesperson focuses more directly on the physician and the benefits
SkinTE can provide to the physician’s patients. In these facilities the process focuses on selling the physician on an evaluation use of SkinTE, and, after the evaluation, entering
into a purchase agreement.

Once purchase agreements are in place, our sales team and clinical operations staff maintain close contact with the health care provider to support the initial therapeutic

applications of SkinTE. This relationship enhances a provider’s ability to effectively incorporate SkinTE into its existing patient treatment decisions.

SkinTE’s pricing structure is designed to be competitive in the marketplace and reflects SkinTE’s ability to deliver durable, functional full-thickness skin replacement
with only one application, compared to the costly practice of regular wound care over a long period of time. We are working closely with our customers to ensure that pricing is
not a barrier to broad adoption of SkinTE across a variety of wounds and points of care.

9

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Payment and Reimbursement

Inpatient Setting.

In the inpatient setting, facility reimbursement is dictated by the associated bundled Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) payment for the entire
episode of care under the Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS). The bundled DRG facility payment is determined by the DRG code applied, which factors in
the primary diagnosis and patient characteristics, such as co-morbidities present on admission. In this scenario, all products and supplies utilized during the episode of care are
paid for with the bundled DRG facility payment, including products like SkinTE. In addition, physician services are billed and reimbursed outside of the bundled DRG facility
payment,  including  any  procedures  performed  during  that  admission,  which  are  billed  for  and  reimbursed  utilizing  Current  Procedural  Terminology  (CPT)  codes  associated
with  the  respective  procedures.  SkinTE  has  been  used  within  the  inpatient  setting  and  reimbursed  underneath  the  applicable  DRG  bundled  facility  payments,  and  to  our
knowledge all associated procedures billed for outside the DRG as physician services with CPT codes have been reimbursed, as well.

Hospital Outpatient Department (HOPD) and Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) Setting.

Like  the  inpatient  setting,  bundled Ambulatory  Classification  Payment  (APC)  facility  payments  are  received  under  the  Medicare  Outpatient  Prospective  Payment
System (OPPS) for services and supplies utilized for procedures within Hospital Outpatient Departments (HOPDs) and Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs). In these settings,
bundled APC facility payments are dictated by the procedures performed and billed for through the appropriate CPT codes. SkinTE has been used in these settings and covered
with  the  associated  bundled APC  facility  payments  and  physician  services  have  been  paid  for  outside  of  the APC  payment  utilizing  CPT  codes  to  bill  for  the  associated
procedures.

Office or Clinic Setting.

In contrast to the inpatient, HOPD, and ASC settings, care provided in a physician office or clinic is reimbursed based on individual Healthcare Common Procedure
Coding System (HCPCS) and CPT codes, facilitating reimbursement for the specific products utilized and procedures performed during the clinic visit. The CPT codes used in
the  setting  are  the  same  or  similar  to  the  CPT  codes  used  to  bill  for  physician  services  in  the  other  settings  of  care.  In  2018,  providers  utilized  HCPCS  Q  code  4100  (skin
substitute not otherwise specified) to bill for the use of SkinTE in the office. Of the providers that used SkinTE in the office or clinic setting throughout 2018, to our knowledge
all were reimbursed utilizing Q4100. Early in 2018 we filed an application with The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) for a unique HCPCS SkinTE Q code.
We were successful and received HCPCS Q4200, which was effective January 1, 2019.

In November 2019, we made a business decision to no longer promote the use of Q4200 in office or clinic settings. We believe there are appropriate Level 1 CPT
Codes within the Full Thickness Skin Graft code category, in addition to Surgical Preparation codes with appropriate modifiers (52 & 58) that are appropriate for SkinTE. We
expect, however, that hospitals will continue to use Q4200 with alpha ‘N’ to denote zero value of the product along with Revenue Code 0636 when SkinTE is bundled within the
payments hospitals receive for full thickness skin grafting CPTs. We will continue to report ASP and work with CMS within the respective framework because we believe that
SkinTE can qualify as a high cost product based on current CMS guidance in place. The strategy will support projected commercial payer adoption moving forward, and we are
developing evidence to support this objective.

10

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Development Projects

Accelerating adoption and growth of SkinTE is a priority for us. The focus of our development projects reflects that priority.

SkinTE Cryo

SkinTE Cryo allows us to offer multiple deployments from one original harvest through a cryopreservation process. We believe this is a valuable offering that will

enhance our SkinTE commercialization effort for several reasons. Using one harvest for multiple deployments improves patient treatment when:

●
●
●

a patient is susceptible to multiple chronic wounds;
the provider suspects a patient might require a second deployment of SkinTE due to past non-compliance with rehab protocols; or
the provider elects to use a staged deployment on a patient with a large wound due to wound location or other therapeutic circumstances.

We  believe  we  will  complete  our  development  work  on  SkinTE  Cryo  in  the  second  quarter  of  2020  and  are  evaluating  options  for  commercializing  SkinTE  Cryo,

which we believe we will be able to test in a limited market release during the second half of 2020.

SkinTE POC

Our SkinTE point-of-care device is intended to permit the processing and deployment of SkinTE immediately following the initial harvest at the point-of-care. SkinTE
POC is in the development stage and we are now evaluating different designs for the device with a view to what users will find most conducive to application in a hospital or
clinic. This is a long-term development project.

PTE 11000

PTE 11000 is an allogenic, biologically active dressing for use in wound care and aesthetics to accelerate healing of skin. It is a composition made using cadaveric

tissue via a proprietary process. It is currently in the preclinical phase of development and we believe this development phase may be completed sometime in 2021.

OsteoTE

We applied our platform technology to develop OsteoTE, our autologous, homologous bone regeneration product. OsteoTE is designed to utilize the patient’s own
bone to target applications for bone repair, reconstruction, replacement, supplementation, and regeneration, including in the long bone (hard, dense bones that provide structure,
strength  and  mobility  such  as  the  femur  or  humerus),  craniomaxillofacial,  spine,  dental,  hand,  and  foot/ankle  markets.  We  are  pursuing  additional  pre-clinical  testing  and
research to gather more information on potential markets for this product. This is a long-term development project.

11

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Potential Products

We believe our innovative technologies may be platforms for developing therapies that address a variety of indications, including cartilage, muscle, blood vessels, and
neural elements, as well as solid and hollow organ composite tissue systems. Accordingly, we will investigate and evaluate these product opportunities as time and resources
permit given our focus on commercializing SkinTE and the product candidates described above.

● CartTE to deliver a cartilage construct for a variety of applications, including osteoarthritis therapies, facial reconstruction, facial aesthetics, hand reconstruction, as
well as wrist reconstruction. Osteoarthritis of the hip or knee is estimated to affect 9% of the US population greater than 30 years of age, with costs of treatment
totaling $28.6 billion in 2013, according to a review by Grande et al. Market projections by Krutz et al. in 2007 predict that the demand for primary (first-time) total
hip and knee replacements will grow to 572,000 and 3.48 million procedures per year by 2030 in the US, respectively. We believe this demand for joint replacement
demonstrates the substantial opportunity for alternative therapies that can delay or prevent traumatic joint replacement surgeries.

● AdipoTE to optimize the delivery of autologous fat beyond the capabilities of current fat transfer techniques utilized in procedures on, among others, the breast,
buttocks, and face. In 2016, according to the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery,  approximately 100,000 fat transfer procedures were performed when
combining the breast, buttocks, and face, including a 41% increase in fat transfers to the breast.

● AngioTE to address vascular regeneration including microscopic capillary networks all the way up to great vessel replacement. Approximately 400,000 coronary
bypass grafts are performed per year in the US according to the CDC. In addition, 650,000 patients per year in the US and 2 million patients per year worldwide are
affected by end stage renal disease, who may benefit from placement of hemodialysis access, including arteriovenous fistula creation.

● NeuralTE for  peripheral  nerve  injuries  of  the  extremities,  as  well  as  for  patients  with  neuromas  or  chronic  compression  due  to  joint replacements,  migraines,

craniofacial injuries, carpal tunnel syndrome, and those who have undergone hernia or abdominal-based procedures;

● UroTE targeting the delivery of autologous urogenital epithelium and submucosa across a spectrum of diseases and processes, including urethral strictures, urethral

●

creation, bladder reconstruction, and ureter reconstruction;
LiverTE to address numerous causes of liver failure, including NASH, fibrosis/cirrhosis, surgical resection of the liver. According to the CDC, 1.6% of US adults are
diagnosed with liver disease, which fails to recognize the portion that are at risk of liver disease, or those with distant metastases within their liver that may undergo
resection of a significant portion of the organ.

● BowelTE to  deliver  an  optimized  autologous  construct  to  aid  in  the  regeneration  of  bowel  tissue. According  to  the  CDC,  approximately 10  million  outpatient
procedures  and  6  million  inpatient  procedures  were  performed  on  the  digestive  system  in  2010. Anyone undergoing  surgical  repair  or  anastomosis  of  the  bowel
could potentially benefit from a product delivering bowel regeneration.

We believe a number of the product candidates described above will be suitable for marketing via the 361 HCT/P regulatory pathway. If we successfully register and
list a product with the FDA using the 361 HCT/P pathway, we may deploy a commercialization strategy similar to that of SkinTE or we may commercialize the product through
a licensing or strategic partnership arrangement. Any products not suitable for the 361 HCT/P regulatory pathway will need to go through the FDA pre-market approval process,
which usually involves the filing, as applicable, of an Investigational New Drug Application or Biologics License Application that will require preclinical and clinical testing
and substantially extend the time of bringing the product to market.

12

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Manufacturing

We  have  designed  and  developed  manufacturing  processes  and  quality  systems  that  allow  us  to  receive  a  specimen,  qualify  the  incoming  tissue,  process  and
manufacture  the  tissue  product,  and  perform  outgoing  quality  control  and  quality  assurance  work  prior  to  shipping.  We  have  validated  our  manufacturing  process  as  being
aseptic.  All  SkinTE  is  manufactured  within  an  ISO  5  isolator  located  within  an  ISO  7  cleanroom.  Our  processes  are  designed  and  validated  to  prevent  the  spread  of
communicable disease, and to prevent cross-contamination between samples. Our quality systems comply with current Good Tissue Practices under 21 C.F.R. Part 1271.

We  have  designed  our  scalable  manufacturing  process  to  allow  us  to  be  flexible  and  agile  in  real-time,  while  allowing  us  to  shift  resources  daily  to  meet  acute
production needs as well as respond to larger factors, including market forces, multi-facility buildouts, and changes in rapidly evolving technology platforms. In designing our
products and systems, we focused both on being able to meet market demand and to scale manufacturing.

We have significant research facilities and this resource is beneficial to the work we are doing in our development projects. We also offer research services to third

parties on a contract basis through our subsidiary, Arches Research and IBEX. Contract research services help us defray the costs of maintaining a research facility.

We currently operate a facility in Salt Lake City, Utah, consisting of approximately 178,528 square feet. We use this facility for product manufacturing and research
and development work. In April 2019, we leased 6,307 square feet of manufacturing, laboratory, and office space in the Doctors Hospital complex in Augusta, Georgia, where
The  Joseph  M.  Still  Burn  Center  is  located.  We  intend  to  establish  at  the  Doctors  Hospital  a  remote  manufacturing  facility  to  service  the  region,  which  we  believe  will  be
operational in the middle of 2020.

Suppliers

As part of our strategy of ensuring timely delivery of our products, we have avoided relying on any third-party supplier as a sole source vendor for any element of our

production process. We have identified alternate suppliers and, where appropriate, supply alternatives for any sourcing challenges.

Intellectual Property

As we advance our platform technology, product and pipeline developments, we seek to apply a multilayered approach for protecting intellectual property relating to
our innovation with patents (utility and design), copyrights, trademarks, as well as know-how and trade secret protection. We are actively seeking U.S. and international patent
protection for a variety of technologies, including our MPFU technology, our Complex Living Interface Coordinated Self-Assembling Materials (“CLICSAM”) Technology,
our Composite-Interfacing, Biomaterial Accelerant Substrate (“CIBAS”) Technology, as well as Biological Sample Harvest and Deployment Kits.

In striving to protect and enhance proprietary technology, inventions, and improvements that are commercially important to the development of our business, we also
rely  heavily  on  trade  secrets  relating  to  our  proprietary  technology  and  on  know-how.  We  enter  into  confidentiality  agreements  with  our  employees,  consultants,  scientific
advisors, and contractors. We also seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data and trade secrets by maintaining physical security of our premises and physical
and electronic security of our information technology systems.

We  seek  to  complement  the  protection  of  our  innovation  with  a  portfolio  of  trademarks  and  service  marks  in  the  United  States  and  around  the  world.  The
POLARITYTE trademark has been registered in the United States and in other countries throughout the world. Additional registered trademarks in the United States include our
logo, WELCOME TO THE SHIFT, and WHERE SELF REGENERATES SELF.

13

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Competition

The regenerative medicine industry is characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition, and a strong emphasis on intellectual property. We face
substantial competition from companies developing and selling regenerative medicine products, as well as academic research institutions, governmental agencies, and public
and  private  research  institutions.  Our  competition  includes  providers  of  FTSGs  and  STSGs,  the  current  standards  of  care,  as  well  as  other  companies  developing  and
commercializing skin substitutes. Any advances in regenerative medicine by others may be used to develop therapies that compete against SkinTE. We are aware of several
companies focused on the wound market, including Avita Medical, Integra LifeSciences, Wright Medical Group, MiMedx, Osiris, Organogenesis, Allosource, MTF Biologics
and  Vericel,  and  we  face  significant  competition  in  the  wound  care  space  from  multiple  products,  including  ReCell,  Integra  Bilayer  Wound  Matrix,  EpiFix,  Apligraf,
Dermagraft, Grafix, Epicel, and others.

Many of our current or potential competitors, either alone or with their collaboration partners, have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research
and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, and marketing approved products than we do. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove
to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and
retaining  qualified  scientific  and  management  personnel  and  establishing  clinical  trial  sites  and  patient  registration  for  clinical  trials,  as  well  as  in  acquiring  technologies
complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.

Our commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less
severe side effects, are more convenient, or are less expensive than any products that we may develop. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for
their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours (if required), which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to
enter  the  market.  The  key  competitive  factors  affecting  the  success  of  our  programs  are  likely  to  be  their  efficacy,  safety,  convenience,  price,  and  the  availability  of
reimbursement from government and other third-party payers.

Contract Research Services

In May 2018, we purchased the assets of a preclinical research sciences business and related real estate from Ibex Group, L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company, and
Ibex Preclinical Research, Inc., a Utah corporation. We acquired these assets to accelerate research and development of our product candidates, and now operate the business as
IBEX to advance our product development and deliver preclinical research services to third parties. The business consists of a “good laboratory practices” (GLP) compliant
preclinical research facility that is USDA registered and includes vivarium, operating rooms, preparation rooms, storage facilities, and surgical and imaging equipment. The real
property  includes  two  parcels  in  Logan,  Utah,  consisting  of  approximately  1.75  combined  gross  acres  of  land,  together  with  the  buildings,  structures,  fixtures,  and  personal
property located on the real property.

Arches Research offers a complimentary array of research services to those offered through IBEX, providing access to experimental planning, histology, and in vivo
and  in  vitro  imaging,  including  micro-ct. Arches  Research  is  well  equipped  with  state  of  the  art  equipment  and  sophisticated  research  staff  that  provide  a  range  of  services
including veterinary and preclinical services, advanced imaging, biomedical engineering and validation, and molecular biology assays.

14

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government Regulation

Government  authorities,  laws,  and  regulations  in  the  United  States  and  other  countries  regulate  the  manufacturing,  approval,  labeling,  packaging,  storage,  record-
keeping, and promotion of products such as those we have developed and are developing. Any product we are developing must comply  with  the  standards  required  for  the
product category under which the product is classified by such government authorities, laws, and regulations.

FDA Regulation of Tissue-Based Products

The FDA has specific regulations governing human cells, tissues and cellular and tissue-based products, or HCT/Ps. An HCT/P is a product containing or consisting of
human cells or tissue intended for transplantation into a human patient. In the United States, HCT/Ps are subject to varying degrees of regulation by the FDA, depending on if
they fall solely within the scope of Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (the “PHS Act”) (42 U.S.C. § 264) or if they are regulated as drugs, devices, or biological
products under Section 351 of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. § 262) and the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FD&C Act”). Under this two-tiered framework, certain higher
risk HCT/Ps are regulated as new drugs, biologics, or medical devices. Manufacturers of new drugs, biologics, and some medical devices must complete extensive clinical trials,
which must be conducted pursuant to an effective investigational new drug application (“IND”) or investigational device exemption (“IDE”). In addition, the FDA must review
and approve a BLA or NDA before a new drug or biologic may be marketed. For most medical devices, including novel or high-risk medical devices, the FDA must approve a
premarket approval application (“PMA”) or grant clearance to a premarket notification (“510(k)”) application prior to marketing of the device.

If, however, an HCT/P meets the criteria for regulation solely under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act and Part 1271 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (so-called “361 HCT/Ps”), no premarket FDA review for safety and effectiveness under a drug, device, or biological product marketing application is required. The
processor of the 361 HCT/P is required to register and list its products with the FDA, comply with regulations regarding labeling, record keeping, donor eligibility and screening
and testing, process the tissue in accordance with established current Good Tissue Practices (“cGTP”), and investigate and, in certain circumstances, report adverse reactions or
deviations.

To be a 361 HCT/P, a product generally must meet all four of the following criteria:

●
●
●

●

It must be minimally manipulated;
It must be intended for homologous use;
Its manufacture must not involve combination with another article, except for water, crystalloids or a sterilizing, preserving or storage agent, provided the addition of
such article does not raise new clinical safety concerns; and
It must not have a systemic effect and must not be dependent upon the metabolic activity of living cells for its primary function (unless the product is intended for
reproductive use, autologous use, or use in a first- or second-degree blood relative).

We believe that SkinTE and OsteoTE qualify as 361 HCT/Ps. Other products we are developing are being evaluated with respect to regulatory classification, and we

will prepare for any pathway of manufacturing or regulation that is required.

15

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
All establishments that manufacture 361 HCT/Ps must register and list their HCT/Ps with the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (“CBER”) within
five days after commencing operations. In addition, establishments are required to update their registration annually in December or within 30 days of certain changes, and
submit  changes  in  HCT/P  listing  at  the  time  of  or  within  six  months  of  such  change.  Establishments  that  manufacture  361  HCT/Ps  will  know  that  they  are  registered  in
compliance with 21 C.F.R. § 1271.10(a) when they receive a validated form with the Federal Establishment Identification number (“FEI#”) after submitting the Form FDA
3356  (registration  form).  cGTP  requirements  govern,  as  may  be  applicable,  the  facilities,  controls,  and  methods  used  in  the  manufacture  of  HCT/Ps,  including  without
limitation, recovery, donor screening, donor testing, processing, storage, labeling, packaging, and distribution of 361 HCT/Ps.

FDA inspection and enforcement with respect to establishments described in 21 C.F.R. Part 1271 includes inspections conducted, as deemed necessary, to determine
compliance with the applicable provisions and may include, but is not limited to, an assessment of the establishment’s facilities, equipment, finished and unfinished materials,
containers, processes, HCT/Ps, procedures, labeling, records, files, papers, and controls required to be maintained under 21 C.F.R. Part 1271. Such inspections can occur at any
time with or without written notice at such frequency as is determined by the FDA in its sole discretion. Our Salt Lake City manufacturing site was inspected in July 2018 and
we received certain inspectional observations on Form FDA 483 following that inspection. We responded to those observations and engaged in a productive dialog with the
FDA. Following our responses, in or around February 2019, FDA classified the July 2018 inspection of our Salt Lake City Manufacturing site as “Voluntary Action Initiated,”
or “VAI.” A VAI classification indicates that, although FDA found and documented objectionable conditions during its inspection, FDA will not take or recommend regulatory
or enforcement action with respect to such inspectional observations at this time.

The Tissue Reference Group (“TRG”) is a body within the FDA designed to provide recommendations regarding whether a product candidate will be regulated as a
361  HCT/P.  The  Office  of  Combination  Products  (“OCP”)  at  FDA  provides  informal,  non-binding  recommendations  and  formal,  binding  designations  regarding  the
classification  of  products  as  361  HCT/Ps  or  drugs,  biologics,  or  medical  devices.  Product  manufacturers  are  not  required  to  consult  with  the  TRG  or  OCP  and  instead  can
market their products based on their own conclusion that the product meets the 361 HCT/P criteria. We have not consulted the TRG or sought a formal designation from the
OCP.

If we fail  to  comply  with  the  FDA  regulations  and  laws  applicable  to  our  operation  or  tissue  products,  the  FDA  could  take  enforcement  action,  including,  without

limitation, pursuing any of the following sanctions, among others:

● Untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, product seizures, and civil penalties;
● Orders for product retention, recall, or destruction;
● Operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of operations;
● Refusing any requests for product clearance or approval;
● Withdrawing or suspending any applications for approval or approvals already granted; or
● Criminal prosecution.

For more information on this regulatory risk, please see the discussion below, “Risk Factors,” including but not limited to the information under the heading, “Risks

Related to Registration or Regulatory Approval of Our Product Candidates and Other Government Regulations.”

16

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fraud, Abuse and False Claims

We are directly and indirectly subject to various federal and state laws governing relationships with healthcare providers and other potential referral sources for our
products  pertaining  to  healthcare  fraud  and  abuse,  including  anti-kickback,  false  claims,  and  similar  laws.  In  addition,  federal  and  state  laws  are  also  sometimes  open  to
interpretation. The Company could potentially face legal risks if our interpretation differs from those of enforcement authorities. Further, from time to time the Company may
find itself at a competitive disadvantage if the Company’s interpretation differs from that of its competitors.

In particular, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration (in cash or in
kind), directly or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce either the referral of an individual, or the furnishing, arranging for, or recommending of, a good or service for which
payment may be made in whole or part under federal healthcare programs, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Penalties for violations include criminal penalties and
civil sanctions such as fines, imprisonment and possible exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. The Anti-Kickback Statute is broad and
prohibits many arrangements and practices that are lawful in businesses outside of the healthcare industry. In implementing the statute, the Office of Inspector General of the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“OIG”) has issued a series of regulations, known as the “safe harbors.” These safe harbors set forth provisions that, if all their
applicable  requirements  are  met,  exempt  certain  remuneration  and  remunerative  arrangements  from  violating  the  Anti-Kickback  Statute.  The  failure  of  a  transaction  or
arrangement to fit precisely within one or more safe harbors does not necessarily mean that it is illegal or that prosecution will be pursued. However, conduct and business
arrangements that do not fully satisfy each applicable element of a safe harbor may result in increased scrutiny by government enforcement authorities, such as the OIG. Many
states have laws similar to the federal law.

Also,  the  federal  False  Claims Act  (“FCA”)  imposes  civil  liability  on  any  person  or  entity  that  submits,  or  causes  others  to  submit,  a  false  or  fraudulent  claim  for
payment (e.g., by the Medicare or Medicaid programs) to the U.S. government. Damages under the FCA can be significant, and consist of the imposition of fines and penalties,
as well as possible exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. The FCA also allows a private individual or entity (i.e., a whistleblower) with
knowledge of past or present fraud against the federal government to sue on behalf of the government and to be paid a portion of the government’s recovery, which can include
both civil penalties and up to three times the amount of the government’s damages (usually the amount reimbursed by federal healthcare programs). The U.S. Department of
Justice takes the position that the marketing and promotional practices of life sciences product manufacturers, including the off-label promotion of products, the provision of
inaccurate  or  misleading  reimbursement  guidance,  or  the  payment  of  prohibited  kickbacks,  may  cause  the  submission  of  improper  claims  to  federal  and  state  healthcare
entitlement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid by health care providers that use the manufacturer’s products, which results in a violation of the FCA. In certain cases, in
order  to  settle  allegations  under  the  FCA,  manufacturers  have  entered  into  criminal  and  civil  settlements  with  the  federal  government  under  which  they  entered  into  plea
agreements, paid substantial monetary amounts and entered into corporate integrity agreements (“CIAs”) that require, among other things, substantial government oversight, as
well as reporting and remedial actions going forward

17

 
 
 
 
 
 
If we fail to comply with these laws, we could be subject to enforcement actions, including but not limited to:

● Multi-year investigations by federal and state governments;
● Criminal and civil fines and penalties;
● Obligations under settlement agreements, such as CIAs or Deferred Prosecution Agreements; or
●

Exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs.

For more information on this fraud, abuse, and false claim risk, please see the discussion below, “Risk Factors,” including but not limited to the information under the
heading, “We are subject to numerous federal and state healthcare laws and regulations, and a failure to comply with such laws and regulations could have an adverse effect on
our business and our ability to compete in the marketplace.”

Environmental Matters

Our research, development and tissue preservation activities generate some chemical and biomedical wastes, consisting primarily of diluted alcohols and acids, and
human and animal pathological and biological wastes, including human and animal tissue and body fluids removed during laboratory procedures. The chemical and biomedical
wastes generated by our research, development and tissue processing operations are placed in appropriately constructed and labeled containers and are segregated from other
wastes. We contract with third parties for transport, treatment, and disposal of waste. We strive to remain compliant with applicable laws and regulations promulgated by the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and similar state agencies.

Reimbursement

In the United States, demand for access to any medical product will depend in large part on both the availability and the amount of reimbursement from third-party
payers, including government healthcare programs (such as Medicare and Medicaid), and commercial healthcare insurers, such as managed care organizations and other private
health plans. Third-party payers have complex rules and requirements for coverage and reimbursement of healthcare products and services. Even the applications to such third-
party payers to be eligible for reimbursement for product or services are complex and can be lengthy and time consuming. For new technologies coming to market, these payers
are increasingly examining the clinical evidence supporting medical necessity and cost effectiveness decisions in addition to safety and efficacy, which can result in barriers to
early  coverage  reimbursement,  or  denial  of  coverage  and  reimbursement  altogether.  Accordingly,  significant  uncertainty  exists  as  to  the  availability  of  coverage  and
reimbursement status for new medical products. If third-party payer reimbursement is unavailable to our customer hospitals, physicians, and providers, our sales may be limited
and we may not be able to realize an appropriate return on our investment in research and product development.

Payers often set payment rates depending on the site of service and many use the Medicare program as a benchmark for their own payment methodologies. In the
hospital inpatient setting, Medicare payment generally is set at pre-determined rates for all products and services provided during a patient stay, and is based on such factors as
the patient diagnosis, procedures performed, patient age, and complications. In the physician office or clinic setting, Medicare payment generally is based on a fee schedule,
with payment rates set for each procedure performed and product used, although the schedule may in some instance bundle the product into the payment for the procedure. In
some  outpatient  settings,  such  as  in  the  case  of  the  hospital  outpatient  clinic  setting,  Medicare  payment  rates  generally  are  premised  on  classifications  of  services  that  have
similar clinical characteristics and similar costs.

Reimbursement policies depend in part on legislation designed to regulate the healthcare industry and federal and state governments continue to propose and pass new
healthcare legislation and government agencies revise or change their regulations and policies from time to time. We cannot predict whether or how such reform measures and
policy changes would affect reimbursement rates and demand for our products.

18

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Patient Privacy

HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, and their implementing regulations, including the final
omnibus rule published on January 25, 2013, mandates, among other things, the adoption of uniform standards for the electronic exchange of information in common healthcare
transactions, as well as standards relating to the privacy and security of individually identifiable health information, which require the adoption of administrative, physical and
technical  safeguards  to  protect  such  information. Among  other  things,  HITECH  makes  HIPAA’s  security  standards  directly  applicable  to  business  associates,  defined  as
independent contractors or agents of covered entities that create, receive or obtain protected health information in connection with providing a service for or on behalf of a
covered  entity.  Because  our  products  use  autologous  tissue  sources  that  are  tracked  and  reapplied  to  the  same  individual  patient  from  which  the  tissue  was  harvested,  our
business maintains substantial amounts of patient identifiable health information. HITECH also increased the civil and criminal penalties that may be imposed against covered
entities and business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA
laws and seek attorney’s fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. In addition, certain state laws govern the privacy and security of health information in
certain circumstances, some of which are more stringent than HIPAA and many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus
complicating compliance efforts. Failure to comply with these laws, where applicable, can result in the imposition of significant civil or criminal penalties. Since we do not
submit claims electronically to payers, we do not believe we are a covered entity under HIPAA.

Transparency Laws

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act imposes, among other things, annual reporting requirements for covered manufacturers for certain payments and other
transfers of value provided to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as certain ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members.
We do not believe that we are a covered manufacturer under the statute because our products are neither regulated as pharmaceuticals, biologics, nor medical devices by the
FDA, and 361 HCT/Ps are not expressly addressed by this law. We do, however, voluntarily file annual reports because we believe it enhances our reputation in the medical
industry to be transparent about what we do and how we do it.

USDA

The Company and its subsidiaries conduct preclinical research and development, which is regulated by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal
and Plant Health and Inspection Service (APHIS) and must be performed in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act, Animal Welfare Regulations, and Animal Care Policies.
The Company and each of its subsidiaries that conduct preclinical research have in place Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees to oversee compliance with the animal
care and use program and report accordingly to the USDA on an at least a semi-annual basis. All sites that maintain USDA-covered species are actively registered as USDA
research facilities.

Employees

We had approximately 153 full-time employees and four part-time employees as of December 31, 2019, all of whom are in the United States. None of our employees

are represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

19

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate History

Majesco Entertainment Company, a Delaware corporation (“Majesco DE”), was incorporated in the state of Delaware on May 8, 1998. On December 1, 2016, Majesco
Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Majesco DE entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization with PolarityTE, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (“PolarityTE NV”) and the sole shareholder of PolarityTE NV. The asset acquisition was subject to shareholder approval, which was received on March 10, 2017,
and the transaction closed on April 7, 2017. In January 2017, Majesco DE changed its name to “PolarityTE, Inc.” (“PolarityTE”). Majesco Acquisition Corp. was then merged
with PolarityTE NV, which remains a subsidiary of PolarityTE. Majesco Acquisition Corp. II, formed in November 2016 under Majesco Entertainment Company, changed its
name to “PolarityTE MD, Inc.,” and remains a wholly owned subsidiary of PolarityTE.

Prior to the acquisition of PolarityTE NV, Majesco DE developed and published a wide range of video games on digital networks through its Midnight City label. On
May 2, 2017, Majesco Entertainment Company, a Nevada corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of PolarityTE (“Majesco NV Sub”), was formed, into which all the assets
and liabilities of this gaming business were placed. On June 23, 2017, PolarityTE sold the Majesco NV Sub to Zift Interactive LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“Zift”),
pursuant to a purchase agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, PolarityTE sold 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Majesco NV Sub to
Zift, including all the right, title, and interest in and to Majesco NV Sub’s business of developing, publishing, and distributing video game products.

In May 2018 we acquired assets of a preclinical research and veterinary sciences business and related real estate, which we now operate through our subsidiary, Ibex
Preclinical Research, Inc. The aggregate purchase price was $3.8 million, of which $2.3 million was paid at closing and the balance satisfied by a promissory note payable to
the seller with an initial fair value of $1.22 million and contingent consideration with an initial fair value of approximately $0.3 million. As a result, we have significant research
facilities and a well-educated and skilled team of scientists and researchers that perform research on our development projects and comprise the contract research segment of
our business.

Contact and Available Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 123 Wright Brothers Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 and our telephone number is (385) 237-2279.

Our  website  address  is  http://www.polarityte.com.  We  have  included  our  website  address  as  an  inactive  textual  reference  only.  We  make  available,  free  of  charge
through our website, our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
material, or furnish it to the SEC. We also similarly make available, free of charge on our website, the reports filed with the SEC by our executive officers, directors and 10%
stockholders pursuant to Section 16 under the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after copies of those filings are provided to us by those persons.

20

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Our business and operations are subject to many risks and uncertainties as described below. However, the risks and uncertainties described below are not the only
ones  we  face.  Additional  risks  and  uncertainties  that  we  are  unaware  of,  or  that  we  may  currently  deem  immaterial,  may  become  important  factors  that  could  harm  our
business, financial condition or results of operations. If any of the following risks occur, our financial condition or results of operations could suffer.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have a history of operating losses and may never achieve or sustain profitability.

We  have  incurred  significant  operating  losses,  and  may  continue  to  incur  significant  operating  losses  over  the  next  several  years.  We  incurred  a  net  loss  of  $92.5
million for the year ended December 31, 2019, and $65.4 million for the 12-month period ended October 31, 2018. Our ability to achieve profitable operations in the future will
depend in large part upon the successful commercialization of SkinTE, and we are unable to predict when, if ever, that may occur. Our continuing capital needs to support
expansion  of  the  marketing  effort,  clinical  trials,  and  other  costs  of  our  business  could  cause  us  to  seek  additional  funding  through  public  or  private  equity  offerings,  debt
financings or from other sources. The sale of additional equity may result in dilution to our stockholders. In these circumstances, there is no assurance that we would be able to
secure funding on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

If the commercialization of our lead product candidate, SkinTE, is not successful, our results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected.

Our near-term prospects depend upon our ability to effectively market our lead product candidate, SkinTE. Gaining market acceptance and market share depends on a
number  of  factors,  including  favorable  completion  of  pending  clinical  trials,  obtaining  certainty  on  reimbursement  for  different  applications,  and  our  ability  to  develop  an
effective sales team. If we are not successful in commercializing SkinTE or are significantly delayed in doing so, our operating results and financial condition will be adversely
affected.

Our revenue growth for SkinTE depends on our ability to expand our sales force, increase distribution and sales to existing customers and develop new customers, and
there can be no assurance that these efforts will result in significant increases in sales.

We are in the process of investing in development of our direct sales force to allow for the opportunity to increase sales to existing customers and reach new customers.
There can be no assurance that this effort will result in a meaningful increase in revenues. We expect to incur substantial expense to expand our sales force, and there is no
assurance that we will recoup this investment through increased sales or that any increase in sales will allow us to sustain our operations.

Meaningful revenue growth in the foreseeable future is dependent on one product – SkinTE.

While a contributor to revenues, we do not believe our contract services business offers a revenue growth opportunity substantial enough to sustain our operations.
Meaningful revenue growth will come from sales of regenerative tissue products and biomaterials, and the only such product we will be selling for the foreseeable future is
SkinTE. To the extent that sales of SkinTE lag behind our need to generate revenue to make up the gap between available capital and cash flow from operations or there is a
disruption in our ability to generate revenue from the distribution of SkinTE, our results of operations, financial condition, and growth prospects would be materially, adversely
affected.

21

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our ability to effectively sell SkinTE depends on a number of factors that we are still learning about.

Factors impacting our ability to successfully commercialize SkinTE include:

●
●
●
●
●
●

obtaining data from clinical trials that supports the efficacy of SkinTE;
our ability to educate and train physicians and hospitals on the benefits of our product;
the rate at which providers adopt our product;
our ability to scale up our commercialization of SkinTE in a way that generates positive results;
our ability to obtain adequate reimbursement from third parties for our product; and
other activities generally necessary to accelerate market acceptance of a relatively new product that represents a change from traditional treatment regimens.

We began marketing SkinTE on a regional level in the fourth quarter of 2018, so we are still learning about the market and how to approach it with our product. We
have begun to identify important factors, such as the items listed above, that affect our sales effort and continue to gain insight as our experience with marketing SkinTE grows.
As we are still in the learning stage, we cannot predict when, if ever, we will succeed in establishing a formula for selling SkinTE that will produce revenue at a level sufficient
to sustain our operations.

We will incur substantial costs in terms of both money and corporate resources for clinical and preclinical trials, and the results of these trials is uncertain.

We are pursuing two clinical trials for DFUs and VLUs and are evaluating plans for additional clinical trials for SkinTE. Clinical trials entail substantial costs, and we
will  continue  to  incur  substantial  costs  on  clinical  trials  for  SkinTE.  In  addition,  we  expect  that  we  will  pursue  development  work  and  pre-clinical  trials  on  our  product
development projects, which will result in additional costs with no assurance that the research and development work will result in any marketable product or revenue for us.
These expenditures are subject to numerous uncertainties in timing and cost of completion, and potentially detract from our effort to commercialize SkinTE. Finally, there is no
assurance that the results of a clinical or preclinical trial will be helpful in advancing the marketability or development of any product, and to the extent the results are not
helpful, it is unlikely we would be able to recoup our investment in these trials and development efforts.

Our success will be dependent on our ability to achieve a meaningful level of SkinTE acceptance by the medical community.

We believe the lack of SkinTE clinical trials, which we were not required to obtain before commercialization as a 361 HTC/P, has adversely affected the acceptance of
SkinTE by the wound care segment of the medical community. While we hope that our clinical trials will provide positive results, which will help to advance acceptance of
SkinTE, we cannot guarantee this outcome. Our ability to gain, and then maintain, acceptance depends on whether we can demonstrate that SkinTE is an attractive alternative to
existing or wound care treatment options, including both surgical techniques and products. Our ability to do so will depend on physicians’ evaluations of clinical safety, efficacy,
ease of use, reliability, and cost-effectiveness, including insurance reimbursement. If the medical community and patients do not accept SkinTE as safe and effective, our ability
to sell SkinTE and our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

22

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our revenues from our regenerative medicine business will depend upon adequate reimbursement from public and private insurers and health systems.

Our success will depend on the extent to which reimbursement for the costs of our treatments will be available from third-party payers, such as public and private
insurers and health systems, as well as the amounts that they will agree to reimburse. Government and other third-party payers attempt to contain healthcare costs by limiting
both coverage and the level of reimbursement, and the amount of reimbursement for new treatments. Until established payment rates are set by payers, significant uncertainty
usually exists as to the reimbursement status of new healthcare treatments. If we are not successful in obtaining adequate reimbursement for our treatments from these third-
party payers, the market’s acceptance of our treatments could be adversely affected. Inadequate reimbursement levels also likely would create downward price pressure on our
treatments. Even if we succeed in obtaining widespread reimbursement for our treatments at adequate pricing, future changes in reimbursement policies could have a negative
impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Commercial  third-party  payers  and  government  payers  are  increasingly  attempting  to  contain  healthcare  costs  by  demanding  price  discounts,  including  by  limiting
coverage  on  which  products  they  will  pay  for  and  the  amounts  that  they  will  pay  for  new  products  or  products  in  competitive  markets,  and  by  creating  conditions  to
reimbursement, such as coverage eligibility requirements based upon clinical evidence development involving research studies and the collection of physician decision impact
and patient outcomes data. Because of these cost-containment trends, commercial third-party payers and government payers that currently provide or in the future may provide
reimbursement for one or more of our products or product candidates may reduce, suspend, revoke, or discontinue payments or coverage at any time, including those payers that
designate  one  or  more  of  our  product  candidates  as  experimental  and  investigational.  Payers  may  also  create  conditions  to  coverage  or  contract  with  third-party  vendors  to
manage laboratory benefit coverage, in both cases creating burdens for ordering by physicians and patients that may make our products more difficult to sell. The percentage of
submitted claims that are ultimately paid, the length of time to receive payment on claims, and the average reimbursement of those paid claims, is likely to vary from period to
period. Finally, payers may demand discounts or offer reimbursement that minimizes our ability to sell our products profitably, or simply choose to not cover or reimburse our
products at all.

As a result, there is significant uncertainty surrounding whether the use of products that incorporate new technology, such as our product candidates, will be eligible for
coverage by commercial third-party payers and government payers or, if eligible for coverage, what the reimbursement rates will be for these product candidates. The fact that a
product has been approved for reimbursement in the past for any particular intended use or indication or in any particular jurisdiction, does not guarantee that such product will
remain approved for reimbursement, will continue to be reimbursed at comparable rates, or that similar or additional products will be approved for reimbursement in the future.
Reimbursement  of  our  existing  and  future  products  by  commercial  third-party  payers  and  government  payers  may  depend  on  a  number  of  factors,  including  a  payer’s
determination that our existing and future products are:

●
not experimental or investigational;
● medically reasonable and necessary;
●
●
●
●
●

appropriate for the specific patient;
cost effective;
supported by peer-reviewed publications;
included in clinical practice guidelines and pathways; and
supported by clinical utility and health economic studies demonstrating improved outcomes and cost effectiveness.

23

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market  acceptance,  sales  of  products  based  upon  our  platform  technology,  and  our  profitability  may  depend  on  reimbursement  policies  and  healthcare  reform
measures. Several entities conduct technology assessments and provide the results of their assessments for informational purposes to other parties. These assessments may be
used by third-party payers and healthcare providers as grounds to limit or deny coverage for a product. The levels at which government authorities and third-party payers, such
as  private  health  insurers  and  health  maintenance  organizations,  may  reimburse  the  price  patients  pay  for  such  products  could  affect  whether  we  are  able  to  successfully
commercialize  our  product  candidates.  Our  product  and  product  candidates  may  receive  negative  assessments  that  may  impact  our  ability  to  receive  reimbursement  for  a
product. We cannot be sure that reimbursement in the United States or elsewhere will be available for any of our products or product candidates in the future. If reimbursement
is not available or is limited, our ability to commercialize our products and product candidates would be substantially impaired, which would adversely affect the viability of
our commercial operations.

The United States and foreign governments continue to propose and pass legislation designed to reduce the cost of healthcare. We expect that there will continue to be
federal and state proposals to implement governmental controls or impose healthcare requirements. In addition, the Medicare program and increasing emphasis on managed or
accountable care in the United States will continue to put pressure on product utilization and pricing. Utilization and cost control initiatives could decrease the volume of orders
or payment that we would receive for any products in the future, which would limit our revenue and profitability. If we are unable to obtain or maintain reimbursement approval
from commercial third-party payers and Medicare and Medicaid programs for our products and product candidates, or if the amount reimbursed is inadequate, our ability to
generate revenues could be limited.

There may be significant fluctuations in our operating results.

We are at the beginning of the second year of our focused commercialization effort for SkinTE, so significant quarterly fluctuations in our results of operations are
expected because our customer base, while growing, remains very small in relation to the overall wound care market. Fluctuations in quarterly results may also be caused by
seasonal changes in wound care treatment demand, timing of sales force expansion, and general economic conditions. There can be no assurance that the level of revenues and
profits, if any, we achieve in any particular fiscal period, will not be significantly lower than in other comparable fiscal periods. Our spending on operations is based, in part, on
our expectations as to future revenues. As a result, if future revenues are below expectations, net income or loss may be disproportionately affected by a reduction in revenues,
as any corresponding reduction in expenses may not be proportionate to the reduction in revenues.

The recent widespread outbreak of respiratory illness caused by a strain of coronavirus (Covid-19) has resulted in business closures and disruptions that may affect
various  suppliers  of  items  we  may  use  to  produce  and  deliver  SkinTE,  notwithstanding  the  fact  that  we  operate  entirely  within  the  United  States. A  significant  outbreak  of
coronavirus and other contagious diseases could result in a widespread health crisis that might have a chilling effect on patients seeking treatment from healthcare providers for
conditions  where  SkinTE  may  be  suitable,  and  could  adversely  affect  the  economies  and  financial  markets  worldwide,  resulting  in  an  economic  downturn  that  could  affect
demand for our products and impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

24

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our  manufacturing  operations  in  the  U.S.  depend  primarily  on  one  facility.  If  this  facility  is  destroyed  or  we  experience  any  manufacturing  difficulties,  disruptions,  or
delays, this could limit supply of our product or adversely affect our ability to sell products or conduct our clinical trials, and our business would be adversely impacted.

All of the manufacturing of SkinTE takes place at our single U.S. facility. We are in the process of developing another manufacturing facility in Augusta, Georgia, but
this facility is not yet operational. If regulatory, manufacturing, or other problems require us to discontinue production at our current facility, we will not be able to supply
SkinTE to patients or have supplies for clinical trials, which would adversely impact our business. If this facility or the equipment in it is significantly damaged or destroyed by
fire, flood, power loss, or similar events, we may not be able to quickly or inexpensively replace our manufacturing capacity or replace the facility at all. In the event  of  a
temporary or protracted loss of this facility or equipment, we might not be able to quickly transfer manufacturing to our facility under development or to another third party.
Even if we could transfer manufacturing from one facility to another, the shift would likely be expensive and time-consuming, particularly since an alternative facility would
need  to  comply  with  applicable  cGTP  or  the  FDA’s  current  good  manufacturing  practices  (“cGMP”)  regulatory  and  quality  standard  requirements  and,  if  applicable,  FDA
approval would be required before any products manufactured at that facility could be made commercially available.

Performance issues, service interruptions or price increases by our shipping carriers could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and
harm our reputation and the relationship between us and the healthcare providers with which we work.

Expedited, reliable shipping is essential to our operations. We rely heavily on providers of transport services for reliable and secure point-to-point transport of skin
harvested from patients and the return of SkinTE manufactured for those patients, and for tracking of these shipments. Should a carrier encounter delivery performance issues
such as loss, damage, or destruction of any delivery systems, it could result in delays in delivering our product and spoilage of the SkinTE we produce for patients, which is
viable for 14 days following the skin harvest date. Any such occurrences may damage our reputation and lead to decreased demand for our solution and increased cost and
expense to our business. In addition, any significant increase in shipping rates could adversely affect our operating margins and results of operations. Similarly, strikes, severe
weather, natural disasters or other service interruptions affecting delivery services we use would adversely affect our ability to process orders for SkinTE on a timely basis.

We may implement a product recall or voluntary market withdrawal, which could significantly increase our costs, damage our reputation and disrupt our business.

The  manufacturing,  marketing,  and  processing  of  our  products  and  product  candidates  involves  an  inherent  risk  that  our  tissue  products  or  processes  do  not  meet
applicable quality standards and requirements. In that event, we may voluntarily implement a recall or market withdrawal or may be required to do so by a regulatory authority.
A recall or market withdrawal of one of our products would  be  costly  and  would  divert  management  resources. A  recall  or  withdrawal  of  one  of  our  products,  or  a  similar
product processed by another entity, also could impair sales of our products because of confusion concerning the scope of the recall or withdrawal, or because of the damage to
our reputation for quality and safety.

25

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We intend to, but may not be successful in, establishing and maintaining licensing agreements or strategic partnerships.

We may pursue licensing or strategic partnership opportunities in the future to enhance and accelerate the development and commercialization of our existing products
and potential product candidates. We may rely on such arrangements to assist in launching, marketing, and developing our products and product candidates. However, we may
face  significant  competition  in  seeking  appropriate  arrangements  and  the  negotiation  process  is  time-consuming  and  complex.  Moreover,  we  may  not  be  successful  in  our
efforts to establish a licensing, strategic partnership, or other alternative arrangements for any present or future proposed products and programs for a variety of reasons. Even if
we are successful in our efforts to establish licensing agreements or strategic partnerships, the terms that we agree upon may not be favorable to us, and we may not be able to
maintain such arrangements if, for example, development or approval of a product candidate is delayed or sales of an approved or registered product are disappointing.

We operate in a highly competitive and evolving field and face competition from regenerative medicine, biotech, and pharmaceutical companies, tissue engineering entities,
tissue processors and medical device manufacturers, as well as new market entrants.

We operate in a competitive and continually evolving field. Competition from other regenerative medicine, biotech, and pharmaceutical companies, tissue engineering
entities,  tissue  processors,  medical  device  companies  and  from  research  and  academic  institutions  is  intense,  expected  to  increase,  subject  to  rapid  change,  and  could  be
significantly  affected  by  new  product  introductions.  Our  failure  to  compete  effectively  would  have  a  material  and  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  results  of  operations,  and
financial condition.

Specifically,  we  face  significant  competition  in  the  wound  care  space  from  multiple  products,  including  ReCell,  Integra  Bilayer  Wound  Matrix,  EpiFix, Apligraf,
Dermagraft,  Grafix,  Epicel,  and  others.  The  availability  and  price  of  our  competitors’  products  could  limit  the  demand  and  the  price  we  are  able  to  charge  for  our  product
candidates. We may not be able to implement our business plan if the acceptance of SkinTE is inhibited by price competition or the reluctance of physicians to switch from
existing methods of treatment to SkinTE, or if physicians switch to other new drug or biologic products, or choose to reserve SkinTE for use in limited circumstances.

Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources than we do, and we expect that SkinTE will face intense competition from existing or future products.

SkinTE faces intense competition from existing and future products marketed by large, well-established companies (including but not limited to Avita Medical, Integra
LifeSciences,  Wright  Medical  Group,  MiMedx,  Osiris,  Organogenesis, Allosource,  MTF  Biologics  and  Vericel).  These  competitors  may  successfully  market  products  that
compete in the wound care market, successfully identify product candidates or develop products earlier than we do, or develop products that are more effective or safe, or that
cost less than SkinTE. These competitive factors could require us to conduct additional research and development activities to establish new competitive product targets, which
would be costly and time consuming. These activities would adversely affect our ability to effectively commercialize SkinTE and achieve revenue and profits.

26

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We may have inadequate resources to pursue the development and commercialization of our product candidates or to continue our development programs.

We  are  focused  on  employing  our  resources  to  commercialize  SkinTE,  and  thus  we  expect  to  continue  to  use  our  capital  to  advance  that  objective  rather  than  on
research and development on product candidates that will take a long time to evaluate and develop. Until we can successfully commercialize our product candidates and achieve
significant revenue, if any, it is unlikely we will be able to make a significant capital commitment to research and development of new product candidates.

The cost and timing of completion of our preclinical and clinical development programs is uncertain.

We  expect  that  a  large  percentage  of  our  future  research  and  development  expenses  will  be  incurred  in  support  of  current  and  future  preclinical  and  clinical
development programs. These expenditures are subject to numerous uncertainties in timing and cost of completion. We evaluate our objectives in preclinical models based upon
our own development goals, but such evaluation may differ from requirements of regulatory authorities. We may conduct early stage clinical trials, which may differ for each of
our potential product opportunities. As we obtain results from investigations, preclinical studies, or clinical trials, we may elect to discontinue or delay further evaluations for
certain product candidates or programs to focus resources on more promising product candidates or programs. Completion of clinical trials may take several years and the length
of time generally varies according to the type, complexity, novelty, and intended use of a product candidate. The cost of clinical trials is uncertain and may vary significantly
over  the  life  of  a  product  or  development  project  because  of  unanticipated  differences,  regulatory  requirements,  or  other  obligations,  or  challenges  arising  during  clinical
development.

Our product development programs are based on novel technologies. As a result, our product candidates are inherently risky.

We  cannot  guarantee  that  the  results  we  see  in  clinical  applications  will  be  comparable  to  the  preclinical  results  we  have  observed  in  animals  for  all  our  product

candidates. We also cannot at this stage be certain of the safety of all product candidates that may be developed from our core technology in humans.

We are subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development of product candidates based on new technologies. The novel nature of our products creates significant
challenges  regarding  product  development  and  optimization,  manufacturing,  government  regulation,  third-party  reimbursement,  and  market  acceptance.  For  example,  if
regulatory  agencies  have  limited  experience  or  concerns  in  approving  cellular  and  tissue-based  therapies  for  commercialization,  the  development  and  commercialization
pathway for our therapies may be subject to increased uncertainty, as compared to the pathway for new conventional drugs.

Our potential product candidates represent new classes of therapy that the marketplace may not understand or accept. Furthermore, the success of our product candidates
is dependent on wider acceptance by the medical community.

The market may not understand or accept our potential product candidates. Our product candidates represent new treatments or therapies and compete with a number of
more conventional products and therapies manufactured and marketed by others. The new nature of our potential product candidates creates significant challenges regarding
product development and optimization, manufacturing, government regulation, and third-party reimbursement. As a result, the development pathway for any such product and
its commercialization may be subject to increased scrutiny, as compared to the pathways for more conventional products.

27

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The degree of market acceptance of any of our potential products will depend on a number of factors, including:

The clinical safety and effectiveness of our products and their perceived advantage over alternative treatment methods;

●
● Our ability to convince healthcare providers that the use of our products in a procedure is more beneficial than the standard of care or other available methods;
● Our ability to explain clearly and educate others on the autologous use of patient-specific human cells and tissue-based products, and to avoid potential confusion

with and differentiate ourselves from the ethical controversies associated with human fetal tissue and engineered human tissue;

● Adverse reactions involving our products or the products or product candidates of others that are cell- or tissue-based; and
●

The cost of our products and the reimbursement policies of government and other third-party payers, including the amounts of reimbursement made for our products
and the conditions for such reimbursement.

If patients or the medical community do not accept our potential products as safe and effective for any of the foregoing reasons, or for any other reason, it could affect

our sales, having a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If  serious  adverse  or  inappropriate  side  effects  are  identified  during  the  development  or  use  of  our  product  candidates  or  with  any  procedures  with  which  our  product
candidates are used, we may need to abandon or limit our development of those product candidates.

If SkinTE or other products we develop are associated with undesirable side effects or have characteristics that are unexpected, we may need to abandon their use or
development, or limit them to certain uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from
a risk-benefit perspective. In addition, if any of the procedures with which our products are used is determined to be unsafe, we may be required to delay, alter, or abandon our
product development or commercialization.

We face the risk of product liability claims and may not be able to obtain or maintain adequate product liability insurance.

Our business exposes us to the risk of product liability claims that are inherent in the manufacturing, processing, and marketing of human cellular and tissue-based
products. We may be subject to such claims if our products cause, or appear to have caused, an injury during clinical trials or after commercialization. Claims may be made by
patients,  healthcare  providers,  or  others  selling  our  products.  Defending  a  lawsuit,  regardless  of  merit,  could  be  costly,  divert  management  attention,  and  result  in  adverse
publicity, which could result in the withdrawal, or reduced acceptance, of our products in the market.

Although  we  have  obtained  product  liability  insurance,  such  insurance  is  subject  to  deductibles  and  coverage  limitations  and  we  may  not  be  able  to  maintain  this
insurance. Also, it is possible that claims could exceed the limits of our coverage. If we are unable to obtain or maintain product liability insurance at an acceptable cost or on
acceptable terms with adequate coverage, or otherwise protect ourselves against potential product liability claims or we underestimate the amount of insurance we need, we
could  be  exposed  to  significant  liabilities,  which  may  harm  our  business. A  product  liability  or  other  claim  with  respect  to  uninsured  liabilities  or  for  amounts  in  excess  of
insured liabilities could result in significant costs and significant harm to our business.

28

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We depend on our senior management team and the loss of one or more key employees or an inability to attract and retain highly skilled employees will negatively affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our success depends in part on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified management, clinical and other personnel. We are highly dependent
upon our senior management and other key personnel. Although we have entered into employment agreements with all of our executive officers, each of them may terminate
their employment with us at any time. The replacement of any of our key personnel likely would involve significant time and costs and may significantly delay or prevent the
achievement of our business objectives and could therefore negatively affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, we do not carry any key
person insurance policies that could offset potential loss of service under applicable circumstances.

We have from time to time experienced, and we expect to continue to experience, difficulty in hiring and retaining employees with appropriate qualifications. Many of
the  companies  with  which  we  compete  for  experienced  personnel  have  greater  resources  than  us.  If  we  hire  employees  from  competitors  or  other  companies,  their  former
employers may attempt to assert that these employees or we have breached legal obligations, resulting in a diversion of our time and resources and, potentially, damages.

In addition, job candidates and existing employees often consider the value of the stock awards they receive in connection with their employment. If the perceived
value of our stock awards declines, it may harm our ability to recruit and retain highly skilled employees. Many of our employees have become or will soon become vested in a
substantial  amount  of  our  common  stock  or  a  number  of  common  stock  options.  Our  employees  may  be  more  likely  to  leave  us  if  the  shares  they  own  have  significantly
appreciated in value relative to the original purchase prices of the shares, or if the exercise prices of the options that they hold are significantly below the market price of our
common stock. Our future success also depends on our ability to continue to attract and retain additional executive officers and other key employees. If we fail to attract new
personnel or fail to retain and motivate our current personnel, it will negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

We do not currently own any issued patents in the United States and our ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology through patents and other
means is uncertain and may be inadequate, which could have a material and adverse effect on us.

Our  success  depends  significantly  on  our  ability  to  protect  our  proprietary  rights  in  technologies  that  presently  consist  of  trade  secrets  and  patent  applications.  We
currently have no issued patents in the United States relating to any of our product candidates. We intend to expand our patenting activities and rely on patent protection, as well
as a combination of copyright, trade secret, and trademark laws and nondisclosure, confidentiality, and other contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary technology, and
there can be no assurance these methods of protection will be effective. These legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us
to  gain  or  keep  any  competitive  advantage.  In  addition,  our  presently  pending  patent  applications  include  claims  to  material  aspects  of  our  activities  that  are  not  currently
protected  by  issued  patents  in  the  United  States.  The  patent  application  process  can  be  time  consuming  and  expensive.  We  cannot  ensure  that  any  of  the  pending  patent
applications  we  acquire,  have  acquired,  or  may  file  will  result  in  issued  patents.  Competitors  may  be  able  to  design  around  our  patents  or  develop  procedures  that  provide
outcomes that are comparable or even superior to ours. There is no assurance that the inventors of the patents and applications that we expect to own or license were the first-to-
invent or the first-inventor-to-file on the inventions, or that a third party will not claim ownership in one of our patents or patent applications. We cannot assure you that a third
party does not have or will not obtain patents that could preclude us from practicing the patents we own or license now or in the future.

29

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The failure to obtain and maintain patents or protect our intellectual property rights could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and
financial condition. We cannot be certain that, if challenged, any patents we ultimately obtain would be upheld because a determination of the validity and enforceability of a
patent involves complex issues of fact and law. If one or more of any patents we obtain is invalidated or held unenforceable, such an outcome could reduce or eliminate any
competitive advantage we might otherwise have had.

In the event a competitor infringes upon any patent we obtain, or a third party including but not limited to a university or other research institution, makes a claim of

ownership over our patents or other intellectual property rights, confirming, defending, or enforcing those rights may be costly, uncertain, difficult, and time consuming.

There can be no assurance that a third party, including, but not limited to, a university or other research institution that our founders were associated with in the past, will
not make claims to ownership or other claims related to our technology.

There can be no assurance that a third party, including but not limited to, a university or other research institution that our founders were associated with in the past,
will not make claims to ownership or other claims related to our technology. We believe we have developed our technology outside of any institutions, but we cannot guarantee
such  institutions  would  not  assert  a  claim  to  the  contrary.  Even  if  successful,  litigation  to  enforce  or  defend  our  intellectual  property  rights  could  be  expensive  and  time
consuming, and could divert our management’s attention. Further, bringing litigation to enforce our future patent(s) subjects us to the potential for counterclaims. If one or more
of our current or future patents is challenged in U.S. or foreign courts or the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) or foreign patent offices, the patent(s) may
be found invalid or unenforceable, which could harm our competitive position. If any court or any patent office ultimately cancels or narrows the claims in any of our patents
through any pre- or post-grant patent proceedings, such an outcome could prevent or hinder us from being able to enforce the patent against competitors. Such adverse decisions
could negatively affect our future revenue and results of operations.

We may be subject to claims that our employees have wrongfully appropriated, used, or disclosed intellectual property of their former employers.

We  employ  individuals  who  were  previously  employed  by  other  companies,  universities,  or  academic  institutions.  We  may  be  subject  to  claims  that  we  or  our
employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of a prior employer. Litigation may
be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights
or  personnel,  which  could  adversely  impact  our  business.  Even  if  we  are  successful  in  defending  against  such  claims,  litigation  could  result  in  substantial  costs  and  be  a
distraction to management and other employees. Any of the foregoing could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

30

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We  may  be  subject  to  claims  that  former  or  current  employees,  collaborators,  or  other  third  parties  have  an  interest  in  our  patents,  patent  applications,  or  other
intellectual property as an inventor or co-inventor. Litigation may be necessary to defend against any claims challenging inventorship. If we fail in defending any such claims,
in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, valuable intellectual property. Such
an outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a
distraction to management and other employees.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary information and know-how related to any of our product candidates, our competitive position would be
impaired and our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Some of our technology, including our knowledge regarding certain aspects of the manufacture of our products and potential product candidates, is unpatented and is
maintained by us as trade secrets. To protect these trade secrets, the information is restricted to our employees, consultants, collaborators, and advisors on a need-to-know basis.
In  addition,  we  require  our  employees,  consultants,  collaborators  and  advisors  to  execute  confidentiality  agreements  upon  the  commencement  of  their  relationships  with  us.
These agreements require that all confidential information developed by the individual or made known to the individual by us during the individual’s relationship with us be
kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties. These agreements, however, do not ensure protection against improper use or disclosure of confidential information, and
these agreements may be breached. A breach of confidentiality could affect our competitive position. In addition, in some situations, these agreements and other obligations of
our  employees  to  assign  intellectual  property  to  the  Company  may  conflict  with,  or  be  subject  to,  the  rights  of  third  parties  with  whom  our  employees,  consultants,
collaborators, or advisors have previous employment or consulting relationships. Also, others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and
techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets.

Adequate remedies may not exist in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information. The disclosure of our trade secrets could impair our

competitive position and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may become subject to claims of infringement of the intellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit us from developing our treatment, require us to obtain
licenses from third parties, or to develop non-infringing alternatives, and subject us to substantial monetary damages. We have not obtained and do not intend to obtain
any formal legal opinion regarding our freedom to practice our technology.

Third parties could assert that our processes, product candidates, or technology infringe their patents or other intellectual property rights. Whether a process, product,
or technology infringes a patent or other intellectual property involves complex legal and factual issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. We cannot be certain that
we will not be found to have infringed the intellectual property rights of others. Because patent applications may remain unpublished for certain periods of time and may take
years to be issued as patents, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware or that do not currently contain claims of concern that may later result in issued
patents  that  our  product  candidates,  procedures,  or  processes  will  infringe.  There  may  be  existing  patents  that  our  product  candidates,  procedures,  or  processes  infringe,  of
which infringement we are not aware. Third parties could also assert ownership over our intellectual property. Such an ownership claim could cause us to incur significant costs
to litigate the ownership issues. If an ownership claim by a third party were upheld as valid, we may be unable to obtain a license from the third party on acceptable terms, to
continue to make, use, or sell technology free from claims by that third party of infringement of the third party’s intellectual property. We have not obtained, and do not have a
present intention to obtain, any legal opinion regarding our freedom to practice our technology.

31

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
If we are unsuccessful in actions we bring against the patents of other parties, and it is determined that we infringe upon the patents of third parties, we may be subject
to injunctions, or otherwise prevented from commercializing potential products or services in the relevant jurisdiction, or may be required to obtain licenses to those patents or
develop or obtain alternative technologies, any of which could harm our business. Furthermore, if such challenges to our patent rights are not resolved in our favor, we could be
delayed  or  prevented  from  entering  into  new  collaborations  or  from  commercializing  certain  product  candidates  or  services,  which  could  adversely  affect  our  business  and
results of operations.

If we are successful in obtaining patent protection, we may not be able to enforce those patent rights against third parties.

Successful challenge of any patents or future patents or patent applications such as through opposition, reexamination, inter partes review, interference, or derivation
proceedings  could  result  in  a  loss  of  patent  rights  in  the  relevant  jurisdiction.  Furthermore,  because  of  the  substantial  amount  of  discovery  required  relating  to  intellectual
property  litigation,  there  is  a  risk  that  some  of  our  confidential  or  sensitive  information  could  be  compromised  by  disclosure  in  the  event  of  litigation.  In  addition,  during
litigation there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions, or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive
these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property in countries outside of the United States.

Intellectual property law outside the United States is uncertain and, in many countries, is currently undergoing review and revisions. The laws of some countries do not
protect patent and other intellectual property rights to the same extent as United States laws. Third parties may challenge our patents in foreign countries by initiating pre- and
post-grant oppositions or invalidation proceedings. Developments during opposition or invalidation proceedings in one country may directly or indirectly affect a corresponding
patent or patent application in another country in an adverse manner. It may be necessary or useful for us to participate in proceedings to determine the validity of our patents or
our competitors’ patents that have been issued in countries other than the United States. This could result in substantial costs, divert our efforts and attention from other aspects
of our business, and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Registration or Regulatory Approval of Our Product Candidates and Other Government Regulations

Our business is subject to continuing regulatory oversight by the FDA and other authorities, whose requirements are costly to comply with, and our failure to comply could
result in negative effects on our business.

The  FDA  has  specific  regulations  governing  human  cell,  tissue,  and  cellular  and  tissue-based  products,  commonly  known  as  “HCT/Ps”.  The  FDA  has  broad  post-
market and regulatory and enforcement powers. The FDA’s regulation of HCT/Ps includes requirements for registration and listing of products, donor screening and testing,
processing and distribution (“Current Good Tissue Practices” or “cGTP”), labeling, record keeping, adverse-reaction reporting, inspection, and enforcement.

32

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We believe SkinTE is appropriately regulated solely under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act and Part 1271 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(i.e., as a so-called “361 HCT/P”) and that, as a result, no premarket review or approval by the FDA is required. If the FDA does not agree that SkinTE meets its regulatory
criteria for regulation as a 361 HCT/P, it will be regulated as a drug, device, or biological product, and we could be required to withdraw SkinTE from the market until the
required clinical trials are complete and the applicable premarket regulatory clearances or approvals are obtained. Manufacturers of new drugs, biologics, and some medical
devices must complete extensive clinical trials, which must be conducted pursuant to an effective IND. In addition, the FDA must review and approve a BLA or NDA before a
new drug or biologic may be marketed.

A determination by the FDA that SkinTE is not a 361 HCT/P would negatively impact our commercialization of the product and substantially increase the cost to us of
regulatory compliance, all of which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. This same risk applies to any other product we may develop that we
believe should be regulated as a 361 HCT/P.

Some of the future new products and enhancements of existing products that we expect to develop and market may not be 361 HCT/Ps, and may require premarket
approval or clearance from the FDA. As a result, those product candidates would be subject to additional regulatory requirements, including premarket approval or clearance.
There  can  be  no  assurance,  however,  that  approval  or  clearance  will  be  granted  with  respect  to  any  such  products  or  enhancements  of  existing  products.  Such  products  or
enhancements may encounter significant delays during FDA’s premarket review process that would adversely affect our ability to market such products or enhancements.

Even  if  premarket  approval  or  clearance  are  obtained  from  the  FDA,  the  approvals  or  clearances  may  contain  substantial  limitations  on  the  indicated  uses  of  such
products  and  other  uses  may  be  prohibited.  Product  approvals  by  the  FDA  can  also  be  withdrawn  due  to  failure  to  comply  with  regulatory  standards  or  the  occurrence  of
unforeseen problems following initial approval. Furthermore, the FDA could limit or prevent the distribution of products, and the FDA has the power to require the recall of
such products. FDA regulations depend heavily on administrative interpretation, and there can be no assurance that future interpretations made by the FDA or other regulatory
bodies will not adversely affect our operations. In addition, regulatory approval is subject to continuing compliance with regulatory standards, including the FDA’s current good
manufacturing practice (cGMP) or quality system regulations and adverse event reporting regulations.

If  we  fail  to  comply  with  the  FDA  regulations  regarding  our  products  and  manufacturing  processes,  the  FDA  could  initiate  or  take  enforcement  action,  including,

without limitation, any of the following actions or sanctions:

● Untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees, product seizures, or civil penalties;
● Operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of clinical studies, manufacturing, marketing, or distribution;
● Orders to recall or destroy products.
● Refusing requests for clearance or approval of new products, processes, or procedures, or for certificates or approval to enable export of the same;
● Withdrawing or suspending current applications for approval or clearance, or any approvals or clearances already granted; and
● Civil or criminal prosecution.

33

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
It is likely that the FDA’s regulation of 361 HCT/Ps and other types of products (e.g., drugs, devices, or biologics) will continue to evolve in the future. Complying
with any such new regulatory requirements, guidance or statutes may entail significant time delays and expense, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
While the FDA may issue new or revised guidance or regulations for 361 HCT/Ps, we do not know whether or when such revised draft or final guidance or regulations (if any)
will  be  issued,  the  scope  of  such  guidance,  any  new  rules  or  regulations,  whether  they  will  apply  to  our  technologies  or  products,  or  whether  they  will  be  advantageous  or
disadvantageous to us. In addition, even if it does not issue new regulations or guidance, the FDA could in the future adopt more restrictive interpretations of existing regulations
or increase its enforcement activity, which may adversely affect our business.

Our failure to comply with the regulatory guidelines set forth by the FDA with respect to our product candidates could delay or prevent the completion of market entry,
clinical trials, the approval or registration of any product candidates, or the commercialization of our product candidates.

We are subject to regulation and inspection by the FDA for cGTP compliance, with respect to our 361 HCT/P products. To the extent that future products we develop
or enhancements of existing products we develop are not regulated as 361 HCT/Ps, we will be subject to regulation under cGMP with respect to any such product candidates
that are not 361 HCT/Ps. Complying with cGTP or cGMP will require that we expend time, money, and effort in production, recordkeeping, and quality control to assure that
the product meets applicable specifications and other requirements. For any products for which we are required to obtain FDA premarket approval or clearance, we must also
pass a pre-approval inspection prior to FDA approval or clearance. Failure to pass a pre-approval inspection may significantly delay FDA approval or clearance of our product
candidates. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we would be subject to possible regulatory action and may be limited in the jurisdictions in which we are permitted to
sell our product candidates. As a result, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially harmed.

The manufacture of cell and tissue-based therapy products, such as our product candidates, is highly complex and is characterized by inherent risks and challenges such
as  autologous  raw  material  inconsistencies,  logistical  challenges,  significant  quality  control  and  assurance  requirements,  manufacturing  complexity,  and  significant  manual
processing. Unlike products that rely on chemicals for efficacy, such as most pharmaceuticals, cell and tissue-based therapy products are difficult to characterize due to the
inherent variability of biological input materials.

Additionally, we have limited experience in manufacturing products for commercial purposes and could experience difficulties in the continued manufacturing of our
product  candidates,  either  ourselves  or  through  third-party  contractors  with  whom  we  may  enter  strategic  relationships.  Because  our  experience  in  manufacturing,  sales,
marketing, and distribution is limited, we may encounter unforeseen difficulties in our efforts to efficiently manage the manufacturing, sale, and distribution of our product
candidates, or have to rely on third-party contractors, over which we may not have sole control, to manufacture our product candidates. Moreover, there can be no assurance that
we or any third-party contractors with whom we enter strategic relationships will be successful in streamlining manufacturing operations and implementing efficient, low-cost
manufacturing capabilities and processes that will enable us to meet the quality, price, and production standards or production volumes necessary to achieve profitability. Our
failure to develop these manufacturing processes and capabilities in a timely manner could prevent us from achieving positive results of operations and cash flows.

34

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Even if the FDA regulates SkinTE as 361 HCT/P, we must still generate adequate substantiation for any claims we will make in our marketing. Failure to establish such
adequate substantiation in the opinion of federal or state authorities could substantially impair our ability to generate revenue.

Although we may not need to submit SkinTE to the FDA for premarket approval or be subject to FDA requirements for labeling or promotion of new drugs, biologics,
or medical devices, we still must generate adequate substantiation for claims we make in our marketing materials. Both the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the states
retain jurisdiction over the marketing of 361 HCT/Ps (and other) products in commerce and require a reasonable basis for claims made in marketing materials. Through clinical
use, case studies, clinical studies, as well as other endeavors, we intend to generate such adequate substantiation for any claims we make about our products. If, however, after
we commence marketing of any of our products, including SkinTE, the FTC or one or more states conclude that we lack adequate substantiation for our claims, we may be
subject to significant penalties, or may be forced to alter our marketing approach in one or more jurisdictions. Any of this could materially harm our business.

Even if SkinTE meets the criteria for a 361 HCT/P, it will be subject to ongoing regulation. We could be subject to significant penalties if we fail to comply with these
requirements, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

Even if SkinTE meets the criteria for a 361 HCT/P, we are still subject to numerous post-market requirements, including those related to registration and listing, record
keeping, labeling, cGTP, donor eligibility, deviation and adverse event reporting, and other activities. HCT/Ps that do not meet the definition of a 361 HCT/P are also subject to
these or additional obligations. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we could be subject to, without limitation, warning letters, product seizures, injunctions, or civil
and criminal penalties. We have established our own processing facility, which we believe is cGTP compliant. Any failure by us to maintain cGTP compliance would require
remedial actions, which could potentially include actions such as delays in distribution and sales of our product, as well as enforcement actions.

We face significant uncertainty in the industry due to government healthcare reform.

There have been and continue to be proposals by the federal government, state governments, regulators and third-party payers to control healthcare costs (including but
not  limited  to  capitation  –  the  generalized  cap  on  annual  fees  for  a  type  of  service  or  procedure  such  as  burn  or  wound  care  or  rehabilitation),  and  generally,  to  reform  the
healthcare system in the United States. There are many programs and requirements for which the details have not yet been fully established or the consequences are not fully
understood. These proposals may affect aspects of our business. We also cannot predict what further reform proposals, if any, will be adopted, when they will be adopted, or
what impact they may have on us.

We are subject to numerous federal and state healthcare laws and regulations, and a failure to comply with such laws and regulations could have an adverse effect on our
business and our ability to compete in the marketplace.

There are numerous laws and regulations that govern the means by which companies in the healthcare industry may market their treatments to healthcare professionals
and may compete by discounting the prices of their treatments, including for example, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal False Claims Act (“FCA”), and state law
equivalents to these federal laws that are meant to protect against fraud and abuse, and there are analogous laws in foreign countries. Violations of these laws are punishable by
criminal and civil sanctions, including, but not limited to, in some instances civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, and exclusion from participation in federal and state
healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, federal and state laws are also sometimes open to interpretation. Accordingly, we could potentially face
legal  risks  if  our  interpretation  differs  from  those  of  enforcement  authorities.  Further,  from  time  to  time  we  may  find  ourselves  at  a  competitive  disadvantage  if  our
interpretation differs from that of our competitors.

35

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Specifically, anti-kickback laws and regulations prohibit any knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration (direct or indirect,
in cash or in kind) in return for the referral, use, ordering, or recommending of the use of a product or service for which payment may be made by Medicare, Medicaid or other
government-sponsored healthcare programs. We have entered into consulting agreements, research agreements and product development agreements with physicians, including
some who may order our products or make decisions to use them. In addition, some of these physicians own our stock, which they purchased in arm’s length transactions on
terms identical to those offered to non-physicians, or received stock awards from us as consideration for services performed by them. While these transactions were structured
with the intention of complying with all applicable laws, including state anti-referral laws and other applicable anti-kickback laws, it is possible that regulatory or enforcement
agencies or courts may in the future view these transactions as prohibited arrangements that must be restructured or for which we would be subject to other significant civil or
criminal penalties. There can be no assurance that regulatory or enforcement authorities will view these arrangements as following applicable laws or that one or more of our
employees or agents will not disregard the rules we have established. Because our strategy relies on the involvement of physicians who consult with us on the design of our
products, perform clinical research on our behalf, or educate the market about the efficacy and uses of our potential products, we could be materially impacted if regulatory or
enforcement agencies or courts interpret our financial relationships with physicians who refer or order our products to be in violation of applicable laws and determine that we
would be unable to achieve compliance with such applicable laws. This could harm our reputation and the reputations of the physicians we engage to provide services on our
behalf. In addition, the cost of noncompliance with these laws could be substantial since we could be subject to monetary fines and civil or criminal penalties, and we could also
be  excluded  from  federally  funded  healthcare  programs,  including  Medicare  and  Medicaid,  for  non-compliance.  Further,  even  the  costs  of  defending  investigations  of
noncompliance could be substantial.

Also, the FCA imposes civil liability on any person or entity that submits, or causes the submission of, a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government. Damages
under the FCA can be significant and consist of the imposition of fines and penalties, as well as potential exclusion from federal healthcare programs (including Medicare and
Medicaid). The FCA also allows a private individual or entity (i.e., a whistleblower) with knowledge of past or present fraud against the federal government to sue on behalf of
the government and to be paid a portion of the government’s recovery, which can include both civil penalties and up to three times the amount of the government’s damages
(usually  the  amount  reimbursed  by  federal  healthcare  programs).  The  U.S.  Department  of  Justice  on  behalf  of  the  government  takes  the  position  that  the  marketing  and
promotional practices of life sciences product manufacturers, including the off-label promotion of products, the provision of inaccurate or misleading reimbursement guidance,
or the payment of prohibited kickbacks to doctors or other referral sources may cause the submission of improper claims to federal and state healthcare entitlement programs,
such  as  Medicare  and  Medicaid,  by  health  care  providers  that  use  the  manufacturer’s  products,  which  results  in  a  violation  of  the  FCA.  In  certain  cases,  in  order  to  settle
allegations of FCA violations, manufacturers have entered into criminal and civil settlements with the federal government under which they entered into plea agreements, paid
substantial monetary amounts, and entered into corporate integrity agreements that require, among other things, substantial reporting and remedial actions going forward.

36

 
 
 
 
In addition, there has been a recent trend of increased federal and state regulation of payments made to physicians and other health care providers. In addition to federal
laws,  some  states,  such  as  California,  Massachusetts,  and  Vermont,  mandate  implementation  of  commercial  compliance  programs,  along  with  the  tracking  and  reporting  of
gifts, compensation, and other remuneration to physicians. The shifting commercial compliance environment and the need to build and maintain robust and expandable systems
to comply with different compliance or reporting requirements in multiple jurisdictions increase the possibility that a healthcare company may run afoul of one or more of the
requirements.

The scope and enforcement of all these laws is uncertain and subject to rapid change, especially considering the lack of applicable precedent and regulations. There can
be no assurance that federal or state regulatory or enforcement authorities will not investigate or challenge our current or future activities under these laws. Any investigation or
challenge  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition,  and  results  of  operations. Any  state  or  federal  regulatory  or  enforcement  review  of  us,
regardless of the outcome, would be costly and time consuming. Additionally, we cannot predict the impact of any changes in these laws, whether these changes are retroactive
or will have effect on a going-forward basis only.

Our  access  to  sensitive  patient  information  is  subject  to  complex  regulations  at  multiple  levels  and  we  would  be  adversely  affected  if  we  fail  to  adequately  protect  this
information.

We receive, maintain and utilize personal health and other confidential and sensitive data as part of the treatments we provide. We have developed a web and mobile
application  through  which  our  customers  can  communicate  with  physicians  and  others,  which  may  involve  sharing  patient  identifiable  health  information.  The  use  and
disclosure of such information is regulated at the federal, state and international levels, and these laws, rules and regulations are subject to change and increased enforcement
activity, such as the audit program implemented by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under HIPAA. International laws, rules and regulations governing the
use and disclosure of such information are generally more stringent than in the United States, and they vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Noncompliance with any privacy
or security laws or regulations, or any security breach, cyber-attack or cybersecurity breach, and any incident involving the theft, misappropriation, loss, or other unauthorized
disclosure of, or access to, sensitive or confidential information, whether by us or by a third party, could require us to expend significant resources to remediate any damage,
interrupt  our  operations,  and  damage  our  brand  and  reputation,  and  could  also  result  in  investigations,  regulatory  enforcement  actions,  material  fines  and  penalties,  loss  of
customers, litigation, or other actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, brand, reputation, cash flows, and operating results.

Our business depends on provider and patient willingness to entrust us with health related and other sensitive personal information. Events that negatively affect that
trust, including incorrect or incomplete disclosure of our uses of their information, or failing to keep our information technology systems and sensitive information secure from
significant attack, theft, damage, loss, or unauthorized disclosure or access, whether as a result of our action or inaction or that of third parties, could adversely affect our brand,
reputation, and revenues, and also expose us to mandatory disclosure to the media, litigation (including class action litigation), and other enforcement proceedings, material
fines, penalties or remediation costs, and compensatory, special, punitive, and statutory damages, consent orders, or injunctive relief, any of which could adversely affect our
business, cash flows, operating results, or financial position. There can be no assurance that any such failure will not occur, or if any does occur, that we will detect it or that it
can be sufficiently remediated.

37

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risks Related to Our Common Stock

An active trading market for our common stock may not continue to develop or be sustained.

Although our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market, or NASDAQ, we cannot assure you that an active, liquid trading market for our shares will
continue to develop or be sustained. If an active market for our common stock does not continue to develop or is not sustained, it may be difficult for you to sell shares quickly
or without depressing the market price for the shares or to sell your shares at all.

The trading price of the shares of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile, and you may not be able to resell some or all your shares at a desired price.

Our stock price has been highly volatile during the 12-month period ended February 29, 2020, with closing stock prices ranging from a high of $16.43 per share to a
low of $1.35 per share. The stock market in general, and the market for biotech companies in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that, at times, has been unrelated to
the operating performance of particular companies. Because of this volatility, investors in our stock may not be able to sell their common stock at or above the price paid for the
shares. The market price for our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including:

●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●

our ability to develop and commercialize our lead product candidate, SkinTE;
results and timing of our clinical trials;
failure or discontinuation of any of our development programs;
issues in manufacturing our product candidates or future approved products;
issues in designing or constructing our commercial manufacturing facilities;
regulatory developments or enforcement in the United States and foreign countries with respect to our product candidates or our competitors’ products;
competition from existing products or new products that may emerge;
developments or disputes concerning patents, patent applications, or other proprietary rights;
introduction of technological innovations or new commercial products by us or our competitors;
announcements by us, our collaborators or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, collaborations or capital commitments;
changes in estimates or recommendations by securities analysts, if any, who cover our common stock;
fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;
public concern over our product candidates or any future approved products;
threatened or actual litigation;
future or anticipated sales of our common stock;
share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels of our shares;
additions or departures of key personnel;
changes in the structure of health care payment systems in the United States or overseas;
failure of any of our products or product candidates to perform safely or effectively or achieve commercial success;
economic and other external factors or other disasters or crises;
period-to-period fluctuations in our financial condition and results of operations;
general market conditions and market conditions for biopharmaceutical stocks; and
overall fluctuations in U.S. equity markets.

In addition, in the past, when the market price of a stock has been volatile, holders of that stock have instituted securities class action litigation against the company
that issued the stock. Defending such litigation could result in substantial defense costs and divert the time and attention of our management, which could seriously harm our
business. As discussed above under “Item 3. Legal Proceedings,” we are currently in the early stages of a stockholder class action lawsuit and, to the extent we incur substantial
costs to defend or resolve that lawsuit, our ability to fund our business will be diminished, which would adversely affect our operations and financial condition.

38

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We are the subject of an SEC investigation, which could result in litigation, government investigations and enforcement actions that could have a material adverse impact
on our operations and financial condition.

On September 7, 2018, the SEC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (SEC v. Honig et al., No. 1:18-cv-01875 (S.D.N.Y.
2018))  alleging  that  certain  persons,  including  John  Stetson,  our  former  Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Chief  Investment  Officer,  Barry  Honig,  who  is  also  a  current  5%
shareholder of the Company, and Michael Brauser, who is also a current 5% shareholder of the Company, manipulated the price of securities of three public companies (none of
which  is  PolarityTE).  This  complaint,  which  was  amended  on  March  8,  2019  (as  amended,  the  “Complaint”),  alleges  that  the  defendants  violated  the  anti-fraud  and  other
provisions  of  the  Securities Act,  the  Exchange Act  and  SEC  rules  promulgated  thereunder  by  writing,  or  causing  to  be  written,  false  or  misleading  promotional  articles,
engaging in a variety of other manipulative trading practices as well as filing false reports of their beneficial ownership or failure to file reports of their beneficial ownership
when required to do so.

In October 2018, we received a document request and inquiries from the SEC relating to subjects addressed in the short seller reports and cooperated fully by providing
the  SEC  with  all  information  relevant  to  their  requests.  On  March  1,  2019,  we  received  a  subpoena  from  the  SEC  requesting  additional  documents  related  to,  among  other
things,  (i)  communications  and  agreements  between  us  and,  among  others,  John  Stetson,  Barry  Honig  and  Michael  Brauser,  (ii)  the  transaction  pursuant  to  which  Majesco
Entertainment  Company  acquired  PolarityTE  NV  and  our  current  regenerative  medicine  business,  (iii)  the  performance  of  and  communications  with  regulators  regarding
SkinTE, our lead product, and (iv) any promotion of the Company or its securities. On March 4, 2019, we obtained from the SEC a copy of the formal order of investigation of
the Company and its affiliates with respect to possible violations of the federal securities laws, including, among other things, the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Act and
the  Exchange Act  with  respect  to  the  Company’s  public  disclosures,  the  beneficial  ownership  reporting  provisions  of  the  Exchange  Act  and  the  anti-price  manipulation
provisions of the Exchange Act. We intend to fully cooperate with the SEC regarding their March 2019 subpoena and this ongoing investigation. Since March 2019, we have
received four additional subpoenas seeking documents on these and other topics. The documents and information requested in the subpoenas include materials concerning (i)
the  circumstances  under  which  the  Company  placed  Denver  Lough,  former  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Naveen  Krishnan,  former  Vice  President  of Analytics,  on  paid
administrative leave, (ii) termination and separation agreements with former employees, and (iii) certain commercialization metrics included in Company disclosures. We have
already provided a substantial amount of documents and information to the SEC in response to these requests and expect to make additional productions in response to the
subpoenas. We met with the SEC on February 11, 2020, to review the status of the investigation and completion of the document production.

As a result of the SEC investigation, we could be subject to additional stockholder litigation, government inquiries or enforcement actions that could name us, our
affiliates, or others. While we will not tolerate stock manipulation and will continue to report suspected wrongdoing to authorities, we cannot predict whether any of these will
arise  or,  if  they  do,  the  possible  outcomes.  Stockholder  litigation,  government  inquiries  or  enforcement  actions  could  adversely  affect  our  reputation,  result  in  significant
expenditures,  including  legal  expenses,  and  potentially  result  in  significant  fines,  penalties  or  other  remedies  against  us,  which  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our
results of operations and financial condition. Although we maintain insurance that may provide coverage for some of these expenses and costs, and we have given notice to our
insurers of the claims, there is risk that the insurers will rescind or otherwise not renew the policies, that some or all of the claims will not be covered by such policies, or that,
even if covered, our ultimate liability will exceed the available insurance.

39

 
 
 
 
 
 
Our  stock  price  may  also  be  negatively  affected  by  the  SEC  investigation,  any  negative  press  or  other  coverage  we  receive  as  a  result  thereof  and  the  uncertainty
surrounding the result of any of these developments, which could adversely affect our ability to raise capital to fund future operations, result in the loss of potential business
opportunities,  be  exploited  by  our  competitors,  undermine  the  confidence  that  hospitals  and  doctors,  key  potential  adopters  of  our  products,  have  in  us  and  our  technology,
cause concern to our current or potential customers, and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, any of which would materially
harm our financial condition, results of operations and prospects. We expect management will continue to devote significant time, attention and resources to these matters and
any additional matters that may arise, which could have a material adverse impact on our commercial development, results of operations and financial condition.

Future sales of our common stock in the public market could cause our stock price to fall.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our
common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. In addition, certain future sales of our equity securities may trigger a
downward adjustment in the exercise price of 10,638,298 common stock purchase warrants we issued in February 2020 with an original exercise price of $2.80 per share, which
could apply additional pressure to depress the market price of our common stock because of the lower warrant exercise price. As of March 6, 2020, we had 38,358,450 shares of
common stock outstanding, all of which, other than shares held by our directors and certain officers and affiliates, were eligible for sale in the public market, subject in some
cases to compliance with the requirements of Rule 144, including the volume limitations and manner of sale requirements. As of December 31, 2019, we also had a significant
number of securities convertible into, or allowing the purchase of, our common stock, including 4,529,988 options and rights to acquire shares of our common stock that are
outstanding under our equity incentive plans, and 5,353,257 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our equity incentive plans, including our 2020 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan. Pursuant to a Purchase Agreement that we have entered with Keystone Capital Partners, LLC (“Keystone”), Keystone has agreed to purchase up to
$25.0 million of shares of our common stock, subject to certain limitations, at our direction from time to time during the 36-month term of the Purchase Agreement. As of
February 29, 2020, we have sold 270,502 shares of our common stock under the Purchase Agreement generating total gross proceeds of $725,000 and have up to $24,275,000
available for future sale under the Purchase Agreement.

Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Restated Bylaws, our Rights Agreement and Delaware law could deter a change of our management, which could
discourage or delay offers to acquire us.

Certain  provisions  of  Delaware  law  and  of  our  Restated  Certificate  of  Incorporation,  as  amended,  and  by-laws,  could  discourage  or  make  it  more  difficult  to
accomplish a proxy contest or other change in our management or the acquisition of control by a holder of a substantial amount of our voting stock. It is possible that these
provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish, or could deter, transactions that stockholders may otherwise consider to be in their best interests or in our best interests.
These provisions include:

● we have a classified Board requiring that members of the Board be elected in different years, which lengthens the time needed to elect a new majority of the Board;

40

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
●

our Board  is  authorized  to  issue  up  to  25,000,000  shares  of  preferred  stock  without  stockholder  approval,  which  could  be  issued by  our  Board  to  increase  the
number of outstanding shares or change the balance of voting control and thwart a takeover attempt;
stockholders are not entitled to remove directors other than by a two-thirds vote and only for cause;
stockholders cannot call a special meeting of stockholders;

●
●
● we require all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of our stockholders, and not by written consent; and
●

stockholders must give advance notice to nominate directors or submit proposals for consideration at stockholder meetings.

We also entered into a rights agreement (the “Rights Agreement”), dated as of November 7, 2019, with Equity Stock Transfer, LLC, as rights agent. Generally, the
Rights Agreement works by imposing a significant penalty upon any person or group (including a group of persons that are acting in concert with each other) that acquires 10%
or more (or 20% or more in the case of a “Passive Institutional Investor,” as defined in the Rights Agreement) of our common stock without the approval of the Board. As a
result, the overall effect of the Rights Agreement may be to render more difficult or discourage a tender or exchange offer or other acquisition of our common stock that is not
approved by the Board. The Rights Agreement could reduce the price that stockholders might be willing to pay for shares of our common stock in the future. Furthermore, the
anti-takeover  provisions  of  the  Rights Agreement  may  make  it  more  difficult  to  replace  management  even  if  the  stockholders  consider  it  beneficial  to  do  so.  The  Rights
Agreement does not prevent the Board from considering any offer that it considers to be in the best interest of its stockholders.

In  addition,  we  are  subject  to  the  anti-takeover  provisions  of  Section  203  of  the  Delaware  General  Corporation  Law,  which  regulates  corporate  acquisitions  by
prohibiting  Delaware  corporations  from  engaging  in  specified  business  combinations  with  particular  stockholders  of  those  companies.  These  provisions  could  discourage
potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control transaction. They could also have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for
our common stock, including transactions that may be in your best interests. These provisions may also prevent changes in our management or limit the price that investors are
willing to pay for our stock.

Because we do not expect to declare cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, stockholders must rely on appreciation of the value of our common
stock for any return on their investment.

While  we  have  in  the  past  declared  and  paid  cash  dividends  on  our  capital  stock,  we  currently  anticipate  that  we  will  retain  future  earnings  for  the  development,
operation and expansion of our business and do not expect to declare or pay any additional cash dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result, only appreciation of the price of
our common stock, if any, will provide a return to investors in this offering.

41

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and
liquidity.

As  discussed  in  “Item  9A.  Controls  and  Procedures,”  below,  we  have  identified  a  material  weakness  in  our  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  through  our
evaluation of our controls at December 31, 2019. In 2019 we failed to execute controls relating to reconciliation procedures. In addition, we did not have a sufficient level of
precision in our review procedures to detect potentially material errors in accrual and related accounts.

A material weakness could result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements requiring a restatement of the affected financial statements. A

material misstatement and resulting restatement entail numerous risks, including the following:

● We could be subject to civil litigation, including class action shareholder actions arising out of or relating to a restatement, which litigation, if decided against us,

could require us to pay substantial judgments, settlements or other penalties;

● Negative publicity relating to a restatement may adversely affect our business and the market price of our common stock;
● Management’s focus on achieving our business objectives may be diverted to addressing (i) the restatement (ii) customers’, employees’, investors’ and regulators’
questions and concerns regarding the restatement, (iii) any negative impact on the Company’s public image with our customers and in the financial market caused
by the restatement, and (iv) any subsequent litigation that may result from the restatement;
The SEC may review a restatement and require further amendment of our public filings; and

●
● We may incur significant expenses associated with preparing and filing a restatement.

Each of these risks described above could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

We incur costs and demands upon management because of being a public company.

As a public company listed in the United States, we are incurring, and will continue to incur, significant legal, accounting and other costs. These costs could negatively
affect our financial results. In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including regulations implemented by
the SEC and stock exchanges, may increase legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are
subject to varying interpretations and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. We intend
to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of
management’s  time  and  attention  from  revenue-generating  activities  to  compliance  activities.  If,  notwithstanding  our  efforts  to  comply  with  new  laws,  regulations  and
standards, we fail to comply, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be harmed.

Failure to comply with these rules also might make it more difficult for us to obtain some types of insurance, including directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, and
we might be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these events could also
make  it  more  difficult  for  us  to  attract  and  retain  qualified  persons  to  serve  on  our  board  of  directors,  on  committees  of  our  board  of  directors  or  as  members  of  senior
management

 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

42

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Item 2. Properties.

On  December  27,  2017,  we  entered  into  a  commercial  lease  agreement  with  Adcomp  LLC,  a  Utah  limited  liability  company,  pursuant  to  which  we  leased
approximately 178,528 rentable square feet of warehouse, manufacturing, office, and lab space at 1960 S. 4250 West, Salt Lake City, UT. The initial term of the lease is five
years and it expires on November 30, 2022. We have a one-time option to renew for an additional five years. The initial base rent under this lease is $98,190 per month ($0.55
per sq. ft.) for the first year of the initial lease term and increases 3.0% per annum thereafter.

In May 2018, we purchased two parcels of real property in Cache County, Utah, consisting of approximately 1.75 combined gross acres of land, together with the
buildings, structures, fixtures, and personal property located at 1072 West RSI Drive, Logan, Utah. This facility is used for the operation of our pre-clinical contract services
business.

 Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

Shareholder Litigation

On June 26, 2018, a class action complaint alleging violations of the Federal securities laws was filed in the United States District Court, District of Utah, by Jose
Moreno against the Company and two directors of the Company, Case No. 2:18-cv-00510-JNP (the “Moreno Complaint”). On July 6, 2018, a similar complaint was filed in the
same court against the same defendants by Yedid Lawi, Case No. 2:18-cv-00541-PMW (the “Lawi Complaint”). Both the Moreno Complaint and Lawi Complaint allege that
the defendants made or were responsible for, disseminating information to the public through reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other channels that
contained material misstatements or omissions in violation of Sections 10 and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 adopted thereunder. Specifically, both complaints
allege  that  the  defendants  misrepresented  the  status  of  one  of  the  Company’s  patent  applications  while  touting  the  unique  nature  of  the  Company’s  technology  and  its
effectiveness.  Plaintiffs  are  seeking  damages  suffered  by  them  and  the  class  consisting  of  the  persons  who  acquired  the  publicly  traded  securities  of  the  Company  between
March  31,  2017,  and  June  22,  2018.  Plaintiffs  have  filed  motions  to  consolidate  and  for  appointment  as  lead  plaintiff.  On  November  28,  2018,  the  Court  consolidated  the
Moreno and Lawi cases under the caption In re PolarityTE, Inc. Securities Litigation (the “Consolidated Securities Litigation”), and requested the appointment of the plaintiff in
Lawi as the lead plaintiff. On January 16, 2019, the Court granted the motion of Yedid Lawi for appointment as lead plaintiff, and on February 1, 2019, the Court granted the
lead plaintiff’s motion for approval of lead counsel and liaison counsel. The Court also ordered that the lead plaintiff file and serve a consolidated complaint no later than 60
days after February 1, 2019. The Lead Plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint on Aril 2, 2019, and asserted essentially the same violations of Federal securities laws recited in
the original complaints. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint on June 3, 2019. Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Company’s motion to dismiss was filed
on August 2, 2019, and the Company filed a reply to the opposition on September 13, 2019. A hearing on the Company’s motion to dismiss was held on November 19, 2019; no
order has been issued to date. At this early stage of the proceedings the Company is unable to make any prediction regarding the outcome of the litigation.

In November 2018, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court, District of Utah, with the caption Monther v. Lough, et al., case no.
2:18-cv-00791-TC, alleging violations of the Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment on the part of certain officers and directors based on the facts and
circumstances recited in the Consolidated Securities Litigation. On November 26, 2018, the court issued an order staying all proceedings until after the disposition of motions to
dismiss the Consolidated Securities Litigation.

43

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Matters

In the ordinary course of business, we may become involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations, proceedings, and threats of litigation relating to intellectual property,
commercial arrangements, employment, regulatory compliance, and other matters. Except as noted above, at December 31, 2019, we were not party to any legal or arbitration
proceedings that may have significant effects on our financial position or results of operations. No governmental proceedings are pending or, to our knowledge, contemplated
against  us.  We  are  not  a  party  to  any  material  proceedings  in  which  any  director,  member  of  senior  management  or  affiliate  of  ours  is  either  a  party  adverse  to  us  or  our
subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to us or our subsidiaries.

 Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

 PART II

 Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “PTE.”

At February 29, 2020, there were approximately 111 holders of record of our common stock.

Information  regarding  our  equity  compensation  plans  as  of  December  31,  2019,  is  disclosed  in  Item  12  “Security  Ownership  of  Certain  Beneficial  Owners  and

Management and Related Stockholder Matters” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 Item 6. Selected Financial Data

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information under this item, pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 301(c).

 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in this Annual Report on Form

10-K.

In addition to historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ
materially from plans and results discussed in forward-looking statements. We encourage you to review the risks and uncertainties discussed in the sections entitled Item 1A.
“Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” included at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks and uncertainties can cause actual results to
differ significantly from those in our forward-looking statements or implied in historical results and trends. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-
looking statements made by us, which speak only as of the date they are made. We disclaim any obligation, except as specifically required by law and the rules of the SEC, to
publicly update or revise any such statements to reflect any change in our expectations or in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statements may be based,
or that may affect the likelihood that actual results will differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.

44

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Overview

On January 11, 2019, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved an amendment to the Restated Bylaws of the Company changing the Company’s fiscal year end
from October 31 to December 31. We made this change to align our fiscal year end with other companies within our industry. Information contained in this section covers the
reporting periods for the year ended December 31, 2019, the two-month period ended December 31, 2018, and the fiscal year ended October 31, 2018.

We  are  a  commercial-stage  biotechnology  and  regenerative  biomaterials  company  focused  on  transforming  the  lives  of  patients  by  discovering,  designing  and
developing a range of regenerative tissue products and biomaterials for the fields of medicine, biomedical engineering and material sciences. We operate two segments: the
regenerative medicine business segment and the contract research segment.

Segment Reporting

The regenerative medicine business segment over the last year has advanced the commercialization of SkinTE, our first commercial product, by expanding the sales
team, pursuing clinical studies of SkinTE, and working on the development of Skin TE Cryo, SkinTE POC, and PTE 11000. The commercial launch of SkinTE in 2018 included
the build out of commercial, manufacturing, and corporate structure to support SkinTE manufacturing and distribution. This includes equipment, personnel, systems, and leased
properties.

In May 2018 we acquired assets of a preclinical research and veterinary sciences business and related real estate, which we now operate through our subsidiary, Ibex
Preclinical Research, Inc. The aggregate purchase price was $3.8 million, of which $2.3 million was paid at closing and the balance satisfied by a promissory note payable to
the seller with an initial fair value of $1.2 million and contingent consideration with an initial fair value of approximately $0.3 million. As a result, we have significant research
facilities and a well-educated and skilled team of scientists and researchers that comprise the contract research segment of our business. We offer research services to unrelated
third parties on a contract basis through our subsidiary, Arches Research. We also use these facilities to advance our own research and development projects. Contract research
services help us defray the costs of maintaining a research facility.

Revenue Recognition

In  the  regenerative  medicine  products  segment,  we  record  product  revenues  primarily  from  the  sale  of  its  regenerative  tissue  products.  We  sell  our  products  to
healthcare providers, primarily through direct sales representatives. Product revenues consist of a single performance obligation that we satisfy at a point in time. In general, we
recognize product revenue upon delivery to the customer. In the contract services segment, we earn service revenues from the provision of contract research services, which
includes  delivery  of  preclinical  studies  and  other  research  services  to  unrelated  third  parties.  Service  revenues  generally  consist  of  a  single  performance  obligation  that  we
satisfy over time using an input method based on costs incurred to date relative to the total costs expected to be required to satisfy the performance obligation.

45

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses primarily represent employee related costs, including stock compensation for research and development executives and staff, lab

and office expenses, clinical trial costs, and other overhead charges.

General and Administrative Expenses

General  and  administrative  expenses  primarily  represent  employee  related  costs,  including  stock  compensation,  for  corporate  executive  and  support  staff,  general
office  expenses,  professional  fees  and  various  other  overhead  charges.  Professional  fees,  including  legal  and  accounting  expenses,  typically  represent  one  of  the  largest
components of our general and administrative expenses. These fees are partially attributable to our required activities as a publicly traded company, such as SEC filings, and
corporate- and business-development initiatives.

Sales and Marketing Expenses

Sales and marketing expenses primarily represent employee related costs, including stock compensation for sales and marketing executives and staff, marketing and

advertising expenses, trade shows and other promotional costs, and other related charges.

Income Taxes

Income  taxes  consist  of  our  provisions  for  income  taxes,  as  affected  by  our  net  operating  loss  carryforwards.  Future  utilization  of  our  net  operating  loss,  or  NOL,
carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the “change in ownership” provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The annual limitation may result in
the expiration of NOL carryforwards before utilization. Due to our history of losses, a valuation allowance sufficient to fully offset our NOL and other deferred tax assets has
been established under current accounting pronouncements, and this valuation allowance will be maintained unless sufficient positive evidence develops to support its reversal.

Leases

On January 1, 2019 the Company adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases (ASC 842) and related amendments, which require lease assets and liabilities to be recorded on the
balance sheet for leases with terms greater than twelve months. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating
leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized
based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. The standard was adopted using the modified retrospective transition
approach by applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of the initial application and not restating comparative periods. The most significant impact was the
recognition  of  ROU  assets  and  lease  liabilities  for  operating  leases,  while  our  accounting  for  finance  leases  remained  substantially  unchanged.  See  Note  2  –  Summary  of
Significant Accounting Policies and Note 8 – Leases in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for additional information regarding
the adoption.

46

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Results of Operations
Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018.

We changed our fiscal year end from October 31 to December 31 effective December 31, 2018. Accordingly, the following presentation and discussion of the results
of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019, which has been audited, will be compared to the unaudited results of operations for the year end December 31, 2018 to
allow comparable year-over-year analysis and discussion of results of operation.

(in thousands)

Net revenues
Products
Services

Total net revenues

Cost of sales
Products
Services

Total cost of sales

Gross profit

Operating costs and expenses
Research and development
General and administrative
Sales and marketing

Total operating costs and expenses

Operating loss
Other income (expense)
Interest income, net
Other income, net
Change in fair value of derivative
Loss on extinguishment of warrant liability

Net loss before income taxes
Benefit for income taxes
Net loss

*Not meaningful

Net Revenues

For the Year Ended

Increase
(Decrease)

December 31, 2019    

December 31, 2018    

Amount

%

(Unaudited)

$

$

2,353   
3,299   
5,652   

1,365   
1,114   
2,479   
3,173   

16,397   
63,189   
16,980   
96,566   
(93,393)  

151   
749   
-   
-   
(92,493)  
-   
(92,493)  

$

$

886   
1,337   
2,223   

693   
689   
1,382   
841   

17,904   
52,912   
5,090   
75,906   
(75,065)  

457   
32   
1,850   
(520)  
(73,246)  
302   
(72,944)  

$

$

1,467   
1,962   
3,429   

672   
425   
1,097   
2,332   

(1,507)  
10,277   
11,890   
20,660   
(18,328)  

(306)  
717   
(1,850)  
520   
(19,247)  
(302)  
(19,549)  

166%
147%
154%

97%
62%
79%
277%

(8)%
19%
234%
27%
24%

* 
* 
* 
* 
26%
* 
27%

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded net revenues of $5.65 million, which represents an increase of $3.43 million from the $2.22 million of net
revenues recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018. The $3.43 million year-over-year increase in net revenues was due primarily to increased revenues in both our
regenerative medicine products and contract services operating segments.

47

 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net  revenues  from  regenerative  medicine  products  increased  by  166%  from  $0.89  million  in  2018  to  $2.35  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2019.  The
increase is attributable primarily to the fact we started our effort to gain meaningful market penetration for SkinTE in the fourth calendar quarter of 2018, and we were pursuing
and expanding the marketing effort throughout 2019.

Net revenues from contract services increased by 147% from $1.34 million in 2018 to $3.30 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase is attributable

primarily to organic growth arising from what we believe is a growing recognition of the research capabilities of our contract services group within the biotechnology industry.

Gross Profit

Gross profit increased by a higher percentage than net revenues period over period from $0.84 million in 2018 to $3.17 million for 2019, or an increase in gross profit
of 277%. We believe this is a result of built-in production capacity for both our goods and services that allows us to sell more of each at a lower incremental cost. While net
revenues from regenerative medicine products increased by 166% year over year, cost of sales increased only 97%. Similarly, net contract services increased by 147% year over
year and cost of sales increased only 62%.

Research and Development

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded research and development expenses totaling approximately $16.40 million, which represents a decrease of
$1.51  million,  or  8%,  from  $17.90  million  of  research  and  development  expenses  in  2018.  There  was  a  reduction  in  staff  in  research  and  development  that  reduced
compensation and benefits costs by $2.51 million, and this reduction was partially offset by an increase in clinical trial costs of $0.96 million.

General and Administrative Expenses

For the year ended December 31, 2019, general and administrative expenses totaled $63.19 million, which represents an increase of $10.28 million as compared to
$52.91 million of general and administrative expenses incurred during the year ended December 31, 2018. Compensation and benefit costs increased $4.05 million, which was
primarily  due  to  an  increase  in  employees  added  to  support  our  SkinTE  commercialization  effort  and  a  one-time  severance  expense  of  $3.76  million  recognized  under  the
separation agreement with our former chief executive officer. Asset disposals increased by $0.93 million. Legal fees increased by $2.48 million due to the costs of responding to
SEC subpoenas and resolving the employment situation with our former chief executive officer, so we expect that much of this added legal expense in 2019 will not recur in
2020. Depreciation expense increased by $1.18 million as a result of significant equipment purchases in 2018.

Sales and Marketing

For the year ended December 31, 2019, sales and marketing expenses totaled $16.98 million, which represents an increase of $11.89 million as compared to $5.09
million of sales and marketing expenses incurred during the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase is attributable primarily to the fact that we started our effort to gain
meaningful market penetration for SkinTE in the fourth calendar quarter of 2018, and we were pursuing and expanding the marketing effort throughout 2019. As a result, we
added approximately $6.09 million of compensation and benefit cost to our selling and marketing expense in 2019 for our sales team. Costs related to our marketing efforts for
travel,  recruiting,  and  training  increased  by  $1.43  million  for  2019  compared  to  2018. Also,  in  2019  external  marketing  costs,  including  trade  shows,  consulting  fees,  and
promotional costs increased $4.27 million in 2019 compared to 2018. We plan to continue expanding our sales effort, so we expect selling and marketing expense will increase
in future periods.

48

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Comparison of the two- month period ended December 31, 2018 compared to the two-month period ended December 31, 2017 (unaudited).

Net Revenues

For the two-month period ended December 31, 2018, total net revenues were $0.7 million including net revenues from products sales of $0.2 million from the sale of
the Company’s core product SkinTE in the regenerative medicine business segment. Regenerative medicine revenues for the two-month period ended December 31, 2017 were
immaterial. Net revenues from services were $0.5 million from the contract research segment operations driven primarily by the IBEX preclinical research business, which was
acquired in the 2018 fiscal year.

Cost of Sales

For the two-month period ended December 31, 2018, cost of sales was approximately $0.4 million and approximately 57% of net revenues. Products cost of sales were
$0.2 million or 92% of products sales due to fixed overhead costs. Services cost of sales were $0.2 million or 40% of service sales. Regenerative medicine cost of sales for the
two-month period ended December 31, 2017 were immaterial.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses decreased $1.5 million, or 30%, in the two-month period ended December 31, 2018, compared to the two-month period ended
December 31, 2017. The decrease is primarily driven by a shift in mix between commercial and operational infrastructure build out in the current period, as well as research and
development costs in the prior period.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $4.7 million, or 58%, in the two-month period ended December 31, 2018 compared to the two-month period ended
December 31, 2017. The Company expanded its infrastructure to support the commercial launch of SkinTE. The resulting increase in expenses is driven primarily by employee-
related costs, including stock-based compensation, salaries, and benefits, and increased outside services expense, including legal and accounting fees and consulting expenses.

Sales and Marketing Expenses

For the two-month period ended December 31, 2018, sales and marketing expenses were $2.7 million. This represents sales personnel and marketing costs primarily

driven by the initial regional release of SkinTE. There were no sales personnel and marketing costs during the two-month period ended December 31, 2017.

Other (Expenses) Income

For the two-month period ended December 31, 2018, other (expenses) income decreased $1.9 million or 95% compared to the two-month period ended December 31,
2017. This resulting decrease was primarily driven by a change in the fair value of derivatives of $2.0 million recorded in the two months ended December 31, 2017. There were
no warrants outstanding for the two-month period ended December 31, 2018.

49

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Loss

Net loss for the two-month period ended December 31, 2018 was approximately $18.4 million compared to a net loss of approximately $11.0 million for the two-month

period ended December 31, 2017, primarily reflecting the increase in sales and operating expenses driven by expanding operations discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2019, our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $29.24 million and our working capital was approximately $22.43 million,
compared to cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $61.84 million and working capital of $56.79 million at December 31, 2018. Our accumulated deficit at
December 31, 2019, was approximately $435.36 million.

On February 14, 2020, we completed an underwritten offering of 10,638,298 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 10,638,298 shares of common
stock. Each common share and warrant were sold together for a combined purchase price of $2.35. The exercise price of each warrant is $2.80 per share, were exercisable
immediately, and will expire February 12, 2027. The net proceeds to the Company from the offering are estimated to be approximately $22.7 million, after estimated offering
expenses payable by us.

We  are  party  to  an  Equity  Purchase Agreement  dated  as  of  December  5,  2019  (the  “Purchase Agreement”),  with  Keystone  Capital  Partners,  LLC  (“Keystone”),
pursuant to which Keystone has agreed to purchase from us up to $25.0 million of shares of our common stock, subject to certain limitations including a minimum purchase
price of $2.00 per share, at our direction from time to time during the 36-month term of the Purchase Agreement. Concurrently, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement
with Keystone, pursuant to which we agreed to register the sales of our common stock pursuant to the Purchase Agreement under our existing shelf registration statement on
Form S-3 or a new registration statement. During the period from the date of Purchase Agreement to the date of this filing, we have sold 270,502 shares of our common stock
under the Purchase Agreement generating total gross proceeds of $725,000 and have up to $24,275,000 available for future sale under the Purchase Agreement. In connection
with the underwritten offering described in the preceding paragraph, we agreed not to sell any additional shares under the Purchase Agreement for a period of 90 days after the
closing date of the offering.

Based upon the current status of our product development and commercialization plans, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, with planned operating
cost reductions, will be adequate to satisfy our capital and operating needs for at least the next 12 months from the date of filing. This conclusion is based on our current capital
resources,  plans  for  commercialization  of  SkinTE,  and  plans  for  implementing  operating  cost  reductions.  We  believe  we  may  need  additional  financing  to  continue  clinical
deployment and commercialization of SkinTE and development of our other product candidates. We will continue to pursue fundraising opportunities when available, however,
such financing may not be available on terms favorable to us, if at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or
more of our product development programs, or effectuate substantial cost reductions in our commercial operations, or be unable to continue operations over a longer term. We
plan to meet our future capital requirements primarily through issuances of equity securities, debt financing, revenue from product sales, or strategic partnership arrangements.
Failure to generate revenue or raise additional capital would adversely affect our ability to achieve our intended business objectives.

50

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our  actual  capital  requirements  will  depend  on  many  factors,  including  among  other  things:  our  ability  to  scale  the  manufacturing  for  and  to  commercialize
successfully SkinTE; the progress and success of clinical evaluation and acceptance of SkinTE; our ability to develop our other product candidates; and the costs and timing of
obtaining any required regulatory registrations or approvals. Our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations
is a forward-looking statement that involves risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary materially. The foregoing factors, along with the other factors described in the
section, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in Part I of this Report on Form 10-K will impact our future capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds. If we are required to
raise  additional  funds,  any  additional  equity  financing  may  be  highly  dilutive,  or  otherwise  disadvantageous,  to  existing  stockholders,  and  debt  financing,  if  available,  may
involve restrictive covenants. If we elect to pursue collaborative arrangements, the terms of such arrangements may require us to relinquish rights to certain of our technologies,
products or marketing territories. Our failure to raise capital when needed, and on acceptable terms, would require us to reduce our operating expenses and would limit our
ability to respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements to develop our product candidates and to continue operations, any of which would have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.

The following table sets forth the primary sources and uses of cash for each period indicated:

(in thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in)
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents

Cash used in operating activities

Year ended
December 31, 2019

Two months ended
December 31, 2018

Year ended
October 31, 2018

$

$

(56,648)  
(15,617)  
26,810 
(45,455)  

$

$

(7,999)  
(7,021)  
(268)  
(15,288)  

$

$

(28,546)
(11,419)
93,259 
53,294 

During the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in operating activities was $56.65 million, which was due to a net loss of $92.49 million mostly offset by the

non-cash expenses of $31.40 million for stock compensation expense and $2.99 million for depreciation and amortization.

During the two-month period ended December 31, 2018, net cash used in operating activities was $8.00 million, which was due to a net loss of $18.42 million mostly

offset by the non-cash expenses of $8.95 million for stock compensation expense and net cash changes in operating assets and liabilities of $1.0 million.

During the year ended October 31, 2018, net cash used in operating activities was $28.55 million, which was due to a net loss of $65.44 million mostly offset by the
non-cash expenses of $38.82 million for stock compensation expense and $1.39 million for depreciation and amortization, and increased by a change in fair value of derivatives
in the amount of $3.81 million.

Cash used in investing activities

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2019,  net  cash  used  in  investing  activities  was  $15.62  million,  which  was  due  primarily  to  investments  in  available  for  sale

securities offset by proceeds from the maturities and sales of such securities.

51

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
During the two-month period ended December 31, 2018, net cash used in investing activities was $7.02 million, which was due primarily to investments in available

for sale securities offset by proceeds from the maturities of such securities.

During the year ended October 31, 2018, net cash used in investing activities was $11.42 million, which was due to the acquisition of IBEX and the purchase of other

property and equipment.

Cash (used in) provided by financing activities

During the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash provided by financing activities was $26.81 million primarily from net proceeds received from sale of common

stock.

During the two-month period ended December 31, 2018, net cash used in financing activities was $0.27 million, which was due to principal payments on term note

payable and financing arrangements. There were no equity financing transactions during the period.

During  the  year  ended  October  31,  2018,  net  cash  provided  by  financing  activities  was  $93.26  million  primarily  from  net  proceeds  received  from  sale  of  common

stock.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

For a description of our significant accounting policies, see note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.

Our  discussion  and  analysis  of  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  is  based  upon  our  consolidated  financial  statements,  which  have  been  prepared  in

accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities or the disclosure of gain or loss contingencies at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Among the more significant estimates included in these financial statements is the extent of progress
toward completion of contracts, stock-based compensation, the valuation allowances for deferred tax benefits, and the valuation of tangible and intangible assets included in
acquisitions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue was recognized under ASC 605 for the year ended October 31, 2018. Under ASC 605, regenerative medicine revenue is recognized upon the shipment of
products or the performance of services when each of the following four criteria is met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) products are delivered or services
are  performed;  (iii)  the  sales  price  is  fixed  or  determinable;  and  (iv)  collectability  is  reasonably  assured.  In  the  contract  services  segment,  revenue  is  recognized  on  the
proportional performance method over the term of the service contract, which requires the Company to make reasonable estimates of the extent of progress toward completion
of the contract. Under this method, revenue is recognized according to the percentage of cost completed for the contract. As a result, unbilled receivables and deferred revenue
are recognized based on payment timing and work completed.

52

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue  was  recognized  under  ASC  606  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2019  and  the  two  months  ended  December  31,  2018.  Under  ASC  606,  revenue  is
recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those
goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that an entity determines are within the scope of ASC 606, the Company performs the following five
steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price
to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

In the regenerative medicine products segment, the Company records product revenues primarily from the sale of its regenerative tissue products. The Company sells
its products to healthcare providers, primarily through direct sales representatives. Product revenues consist of a single performance obligation that the Company satisfies at a
point in time. In general, the Company recognizes product revenue upon delivery to the customer.

In the contract services segment, the Company records service revenues from the sale of its contract research services, which includes delivery of preclinical studies
and other research services to unrelated third parties. Service revenues generally consist of a single performance obligation that the Company satisfies over time using an input
method based on costs incurred to date relative to the total costs expected to be required to satisfy the performance obligation. The Company believes that this method provides
a faithful depiction of the transfer of services over the term of the performance obligation based on the remaining services needed to satisfy the obligation. This requires the
Company to make reasonable estimates of the extent of progress toward completion of the contract. As a result, unbilled receivables and deferred revenue are recognized based
on payment timing and work completed. Generally, a portion of the payment is due upfront and the remainder upon completion of the contract, with most contracts completing
in less than a year. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had unbilled receivables of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and deferred revenue of $0.1
million and $0.2 million, respectively. The unbilled receivables balance is included in consolidated accounts receivable. Revenue of $0.2 million was recognized during the year
ended December 31, 2019 that was included in the deferred revenue balance as of December 31, 2018.

Costs to obtain the contract are incurred for product revenue as they are shipped and are expensed as incurred.

Income Taxes

The  Company  accounts  for  income  taxes  under  the  asset  and  liability  method.  Deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  are  recognized  for  the  future  tax  consequences
attributable  to  differences  between  the  financial  statement  carrying  amounts  of  existing  assets  and  liabilities  and  their  respective  tax  bases  and  operating  loss  and  tax  credit
carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date.  The  Company  evaluates  the  potential  for  realization  of  deferred  tax  assets  at  each  quarterly  balance  sheet  date  and  records  a  valuation  allowance  for  assets  for  which
realization is not more likely than not.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company measures all stock-based compensation using a fair value method and records such expense in research and development, general and administrative,
and sales and marketing expenses. Compensation Expense for stock options with graded vesting is recognized over the service period for each separately vesting tranche of the
award as though the award were in substance, multiple awards.

53

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The fair value for options issued is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury yield

curve in effect at the time of the grant. The volatility factor is determined based on the Company’s historical stock prices. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur.

The fair value of restricted stock grants is measured based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and amortized over the vesting

period of, generally, six months to three years.

Leases

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Right-of-use (“ROU”) assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease
term and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Finance leases are reported in the consolidated balance sheet in
property  and  equipment  and  other  current  and  long-term  liabilities.  The  short-term  portion  of  operating  lease  obligations  are  included  in  other  current  liabilities.  The
classification of the Company’s leases as operating or finance leases along with the initial measurement and recognition of the associated ROU assets and lease liabilities is
performed at the lease commencement date. The measurement of lease liabilities is based on the present value of future lease payments over the lease term. As the Company’s
leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date in determining the
present  value  of  future  lease  payments.  The  ROU  asset  is  based  on  the  measurement  of  the  lease  liability  and  also  includes  any  lease  payments  made  prior  to  or  on  lease
commencement and excludes lease incentives and initial direct costs incurred, as applicable. The lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is
reasonably certain the Company will exercise any such options. Rent expense for the Company’s operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Amortization expense for the ROU asset associated with its finance leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease and interest expense associated with its
finance leases is recognized on the balance of the lease liability using the effective interest method based on the estimated incremental borrowing rate.

The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components. As allowed under ASC 842, the Company has elected not to separate lease and non-lease
components  for  any  leases  involving  real  estate  and  office  equipment  classes  of  assets  and,  as  a  result,  accounts  for  the  lease  and  nonlease  components  as  a  single  lease
component. The Company has also elected not to apply the recognition requirement of ASC 842 to leases with a term of 12 months or less for all classes of assets.

Accruals for Research and Development Expenses and Clinical Trials

As  part  of  the  process  of  preparing  its  financial  statements,  the  Company  is  required  to  estimate  its  expenses  resulting  from  its  obligations  under  contracts  with
vendors, clinical research organizations and consultants and under clinical site agreements in connection with conducting clinical trials. The financial terms of these contracts are
subject to negotiations, which vary from contract to contract and may result in payment terms that do not match the periods over which materials or services are provided under
such contracts. The  Company’s  objective  is  to  reflect  the  appropriate  expenses  in  its  financial  statements  by  matching  those  expenses  with  the  period  in  which  services  are
performed and efforts are expended. The Company accounts for these expenses according to the timing of various aspects of the expenses. The Company determines accrual
estimates by taking into account discussion with applicable personnel and outside service providers as to the progress of clinical trials, or the services completed. During the
course of a clinical trial, the Company adjusts its clinical expense recognition if actual results differ from its estimates. The Company makes estimates of its accrued expenses as
of each balance sheet date based on the facts and circumstances known to it at that time. The Company’s clinical trial accruals are dependent upon the timely and accurate
reporting of contract research organizations and other third-party vendors. Although the Company does not expect its estimates to be materially different from amounts actually
incurred, its understanding of the status and timing of services performed relative to the actual status and timing of services performed may vary and may result in it reporting
amounts that are too high or too low for any particular period.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.

The Company reviews long-lived assets, including property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the
carrying  amount  of  the  assets  may  not  be  fully  recoverable.  Factors  that  the  Company  considers  in  deciding  when  to  perform  an  impairment  review  include  significant
underperformance of the business in relation to expectations, significant negative industry or economic trends, and significant changes or planned changes in the use of the
assets. If an impairment review is performed to evaluate a long-lived asset for recoverability, the Company compares forecasts of undiscounted cash flows expected to result
from the use and eventual disposition of the long-lived asset to its carrying value. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows
expected to result from the use of an asset are less than its carrying amount. The impairment loss would be based on the excess of the carrying value of the impaired asset over
its fair value, determined based on discounted cash flows. There were no impairments of long-lived assets for any of the periods presented.

 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information under this item, pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 305(e).

 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The  financial  statements  required  by  Item  8  are  submitted  in  a  separate  section  of  this  report  beginning  on  Page  F-1,  and  are  incorporated  herein  and  made  a  part

hereof.

 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, with the participation of our President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31,
2019, our President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, were not effective due to the material weakness identified below. To
address the material weakness, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to determine whether the financial statements included herein fairly present our
financial results. Subject to the limitations above, management believes that the consolidated financial statements and other financial information contained in this report, fairly
present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented.

54

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under
the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or GAAP. Our internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

●
●

●

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect transactions involving our assets;
provide reasonable  assurance  that  transactions  are  recorded  as  necessary  to  permit  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  accordance with  GAAP,  and  that  our
receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our management; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements.

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter
how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in
all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These
inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally,
controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of
controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
goals  under  all  potential  future  conditions.  Over  time,  controls  may  become  inadequate  because  of  changes  in  conditions,  or  the  degree  of  compliance  with  the  policies  or
procedures may deteriorate. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions,  or  that  the  degree  of  compliance  with  the  policies  or  procedures  may  deteriorate.  Because  of  the  inherent  limitations  in  a  cost-effective  control  system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making this assessment, management used the
framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013,
or COSO. The COSO framework summarizes each of the components of a company’s internal control system, including (i) the control environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii)
control activities, (iv) information and communication, and (v) monitoring. Based on this evaluation, management determined that our system of internal control over financial
reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2019.

A  material  weakness  is  a  deficiency,  or  a  combination  of  deficiencies,  within  the  meaning  of  Public  Company Accounting  Oversight  Board  (“PCAOB”) Audit
Standard No. 5, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management has identified the following material weakness, which has caused management to conclude that as
of December 31, 2019 our internal control over financial reporting was not effective at the reasonable assurance level:

In 2019 we failed to execute controls relating to reconciliation procedures. In addition, we did not have a sufficient level of precision in our review procedures to detect
potentially material errors in accrual and related accounts.

55

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EisnerAmper, LLP has provided an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

With respect to failure in execution of controls relating to reconciliation procedures identified as a material weakness, above, the material weakness was identified in
the course of management’s assessment of internal controls as of December 31, 2019, so no remedial action was taken in the fourth quarter of 2019. Management plans on
evaluating its reconciliation procedures with the expectation it will implement a control to address the matter for the first quarter of 2020.

56

 
 
 
 
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
PolarityTE, Inc.

Opinion on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We  have  audited  PolarityTE,  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries’  (the  “Company”)  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  December  31,  2019,  based  on  criteria  established  in  the
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, because of the
effect  of  the  material  weakness  described  in  the  following  paragraph  on  the  achievement  of  the  objectives  of  the  control  criteria,  PolarityTE,  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries  has  not
maintained  effective  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  December  31,  2019,  based  on  criteria  established  in  the Internal Control - Integrated Framework  (2013)
issued by COSO.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified
and included in management’s assessment.

In 2019 the Company failed to execute controls relating to reconciliation procedures. In addition, the Company did not have a sufficient level of precision in its review
procedures to detect potentially material errors in accrual and related accounts.

This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of the audit tests applied in our audit of the December 31, 2019 financial statements, and
this report does not affect our report dated March 12, 2020, on those financial statements.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of
PolarityTE, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period from November 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, and the year ended October 31, 2018, and the related
notes, and our report dated March 12, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with
respect  to  the  Company  in  accordance  with  the  U.S.  federal  securities  laws  and  the  applicable  rules  and  regulations  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  and  the
PCAOB.

We  conducted  our  audit  in  accordance  with  the  standards  of  the  PCAOB.  Those  standards  require  that  we  plan  and  perform  the  audit  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about
whether  effective  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  was  maintained  in  all  material  respects.  Our  audit  included  obtaining  an  understanding  of  internal  control  over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

An entity’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial  statements  for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles. An  entity’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  includes  those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
entity;  (ii)  provide  reasonable  assurance  that  transactions  are  recorded  as  necessary  to  permit  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the entity are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the entity; and (iii)
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the entity’s assets that could have a material effect on
the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP

EISNERAMPER LLP
Iselin, NJ
March 12, 2020

57

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

 Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Board of Directors

 PART III

Our Board currently consists of six members and is divided into three classes. The term of office for the directors in each class is three years, and the term expirations

of the three classes are staggered so that only one of the three classes of directors is up for election in each year. The following table sets forth the names, ages and class
designation of all our directors.

Peter A. Cohen
Jeff Dyer
Jon Mogford
Minnie Baylor-Henry
Willie C. Bogan
Rainer Erdtmann

73
61
51
72
70
56

Class III Director, Chairman
Class I Director
Class I Director
Class I Director
Class II Director
Class III Director

58

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following is a summary of the background and qualifications of each of our directors.

Peter A. Cohen joined the Board in June 2018 and became Chairman of the Board in August 2019. Mr. Cohen has served as Vice Chairman of the Board and Lead
Independent Director of Scientific Games Corporation since September 2004. Mr. Cohen was Chairman of Cowen Inc. (formerly known as Cowen Group, Inc.), a diversified
financial  services  company,  and  served  as  Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  from  2009  through  December  2017.  Mr.  Cohen  was  a  founding  partner  and  principal  of
Ramius LLC, a private investment management firm formed in 1994 that was combined with Cowen in late 2009. Mr. Cohen served as a member of the board of directors of
Chart Acquisition Corp. (which, as a result of a business combination, is now known as Tempus Applied Solutions Holdings, Inc.) from 2013 to 2015. From November 1992 to
May 1994, Mr. Cohen was Vice Chairman of the Board and a director of Republic New York Corporation, as well as a member of its executive management committee. Mr.
Cohen was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Shearson Lehman Brothers from 1983 to 1990.

Jeff Dyer  was  appointed  to  our  Board  on  March  2,  2017.  Mr.  Dyer  has  served  as  the  Horace  Beesley  Professor  of  Strategy  at  Brigham  Young  University  since
September  1999.  From August  1993  until  September  1999  he  served  as  an Assistant  Professor  at  Wharton  School,  University  of  Pennsylvania,  and  from  July  1984  until
September 1988 he served as Management Consultant and Manager of Bain & Company. Mr. Dyer received his Bachelor of Science degree in psychology and MBA from
Brigham  Young  University  and  his  PhD  in  management  from  University  of  California,  Los Angeles.  Mr.  Dyer  is  qualified  to  serve  as  a  member  of  the  Company’s  Board
because of his extensive business and management expertise and knowledge of capital markets.

Dr. Jon Mogford  was  appointed  to  our  Board  on  February  8,  2017.  Dr.  Mogford  has  served  in  various  capacities  for  the  Texas A&M  University  System  (“Texas
A&M”). Since May 2013, Dr. Mogford has served as the Vice Chancellor for Research, from August 2012 until April 2013 he served as the Chief Research Officer and from
November 2011 until August 2012 he served as Associate Vice Chancellor for Strategic Initiatives at Texas A&M. Prior to joining Texas A&M in 2011, from February 2010
until October 2011, Dr. Mogford served as Deputy Director of the Defense Sciences Office (DSO) of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in the U.S.
Department of Defense. From July 2005 until January 2009, Dr. Mogford served as Program Manager of DSO of DARPA. In addition, since November 2016, Dr. Mogford has
served as a member of the board of directors of Medovex Corp. Dr. Mogford is the recipient of the Secretary of Defense Medal for Outstanding Public Service. Dr. Mogford
obtained his bachelor’s degree in Zoology from Texas A&M University and doctorate in Medical Physiology from the Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College
Station, Texas. His research in vascular physiology continued at the University of Chicago as a Postdoctoral fellow from 1997 until 1998. Dr. Mogford transitioned his research
focus to the field of wound healing at Northwestern University, both as a Research Associate and as a Research Assistant Professor from 1998 until 2003. He then served as a
Life Sciences Consultant to DARPA on the Revolutionizing Prosthetics program from December 2003 until June 2005. Dr. Mogford is qualified to serve as a member of the
Company’s Board because of his experience and research in regenerative medicine.

Minnie  Baylor-Henry  joined  the  Board  in  December  2018.  She  is  a  regulatory  affairs  leader  who  provides  regulatory  strategic  support  services  to  life  sciences
companies through her consulting firm, B-Henry & Associates. Before starting her consulting company, Ms. Baylor-Henry was employed by Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”) and
members  of  the  J&J  health  care  group  in  a  number  of  positions,  including:  Worldwide  Vice  President  Regulatory Affairs  -  Medical  Devises  for  J&J  from  January  2011  to
March  2015;  Vice  President  -  Medical  &  Regulatory Affairs  –  Specialty  Pharmaceuticals,  and  Vice  President-Regulatory Affairs  –  Over-the-Counter  Products  for  McNeil
Consumer Health Care from August 2003 to October 2008; and, Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs for RW Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development Corporation
from July 1999 to August 2003. From October 2008 to October 2010, Ms. Baylor-Henry served as the National Director Regulatory Affairs Life Sciences for Deloitte. For eight
years  prior  to August  1999,  Ms.  Baylor-Henry  served  in  several  positions  with  the  U.S.  Food  &  Drug Administration,  including  Director/Branch  Chief  –  Division  of  Drug
Marketing, Advertising  and  Communications,  National  Health  Fraud  Coordinator  –  Office  of  Regulatory Affairs/  Federal/  State  Relations,  and  Regulatory  Review  Officer.
From  July  2018,  to  the  present  Ms.  Baylor-Henry  has  served  as  a  director  of  scPharmaceuticals,  Inc.,  a  publicly  held  company  engaged  in  the  business  of  developing
technologies  that  enable  the  subcutaneous  administration  of  therapies  that  have  previously  been  limited  to  intravenous  delivery.  Ms.  Baylor-Henry  received  her  pharmacy
degree from Howard University’s College of Pharmacy and a law degree from Catholic University’s Columbus School of Law. Ms. Baylor-Henry is qualified to serve as a
member of the Board because of her knowledge of the healthcare industry and experience with the regulatory regimen applicable to biologic and pharmaceutical products.

59

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Willie C. Bogan joined the Board in April 2018. Mr. Bogan served as Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of McKesson Corporation (“McKesson”), a
San  Francisco-based  healthcare  services  and  information  technology  company  (which  relocated  its  headquarters  to  Las  Colinas,  TX  in  2019)  currently  ranked  7th  on  the
Fortune  500,  from  July  2009  until  his  retirement  from  McKesson  in  November  2015.  He  joined  McKesson  in  November  2006  as Associate  General  Counsel  and Assistant
Secretary. Before joining McKesson, Mr. Bogan held senior advisory positions at the following public companies in the San Francisco Bay Area: Bank of America; Safeway;
Charles Schwab; and Catellus Development Corporation, a real estate development company. Prior to becoming in-house counsel, he was a partner at Steinberg Miller Bogan &
Goldstein in Manhattan Beach, California. He started his law career as a law firm associate in Los Angeles, California. Mr. Bogan graduated Phi Beta Kappa and Summa Cum
Laude from Dartmouth College where he majored in Spanish. He received an M.A. degree in Politics and Economics from Oxford University where he studied as a Rhodes
Scholar. He earned his J.D. degree from Stanford Law School. Mr. Bogan is qualified to serve as a member of the Board because of his knowledge of the healthcare industry
and his experience as an advisor to public companies and their boards of directors on securities law and corporate governance matters.

Rainer Erdtmann joined the Board in August 2018. He has 26 years of experience in finance and investment banking. For the past three years Mr. Erdtmann has been
a portfolio manager and general partner of Point Sur Investors LLC, specializing in identifying innovative biotech companies. Prior to Point Sur Investors, from February 2009
until September 2015, Mr. Erdtmann was with Pharmacyclics, Inc., a Nasdaq-listed company. He began as Vice President, Finance & Administration, Corporate Secretary and
acted  as  the  Principal  Financial  and Accounting  Officer.  In  that  capacity  he  was  responsible  for  accounting,  SEC  reporting,  audits,  and  investor  relations.  He  built  and  had
operational  responsibility  for  Finance,  IT,  HR,  Legal,  Facilities,  and  Events.  He  later  served  as  Executive  Vice  President  of  Corporate  Affairs  including  Corporate
Communications. Additionally,  he  structured  and  administered  the  international  revenue  for  Pharmacyclics  into  a  swiss-based  subsidiary.  Mr.  Erdtmann  began  his  career  at
Commerzbank,  Germany,  where  he  was  an  investment  banker  and  portfolio  manager  for  institutional  international  accounts.  Mr.  Erdtmann  earned  the  Diplom  Kaufmann
degree, with honors, in Finance and Banking from the Westfaelische Wilhelms Universitaet, Muenster, Germany. Mr. Erdtmann is qualified to serve as a member of the Board
because of his knowledge of the biotech industry, his deep experience in capital markets and finance, and his knowledge of commercial and business practices in Europe and
North America.

60

 
 
 
 
Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the names, and positions of our executive officers.

David Seaburg
Richard Hague
Paul E. Mann
Cameron Hoyler

President (1)

  Chief Operating Officer (1)
  Chief Financial Officer (1)
  General Counsel, Secretary, EVP Corporate Development & Strategy

(1)  Effective  May  31,  2019,  the  Board  established  the  Office  of  the  Chief  Executive,  consisting  of  the  President,  Chief  Operating  Officer,  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  to
function as a team to advance our business objectives.

The following is a summary of the background of each of our executive officers.

David Seaburg, age 50, has served as President of the Company since August 2019. Prior to becoming President, he served as President of Corporate Development for
the Company beginning in March 2019. From August 2018 to March 2019, he provided consulting services to the Company. He served as a director on our Board from August
2018 to August 2019. During the four-year period prior to March 11, 2019, he served as the Managing Director and Head of Sales Trading at Cowen & Company, a diversified
financial services company. Over the course of his 20+ year career at Cowen in both Equity Sales Trading and Trading, Mr. Seaburg advanced to increasingly senior level roles
at  the  firm.  In  2006,  Mr.  Seaburg  was  named  Head  of  Sales  Trading  and  appointed  to  the  firm’s  Equity  Operating  Committee.  Mr.  Seaburg  was  a  CNBC  Fast  Money
Contributor  and  provided  regular  on-air  commentary  for  the  network.  Mr.  Seaburg  holds  a  Bachelor  of Arts  degree  in  Business  Finance  and  Economics  from  Northeastern
University.

Richard Hague, age 59, served as the Chief Commercial Officer of Anika Therapeutics, Inc., from October 2015 to April 2019, when he joined PolarityTE as Chief
Operating Officer. From November 2014 to October 2015, Mr. Hague was the Vice President Sales and Marketing at TEI Medical where he was responsible for driving the
revenue  growth  of  that  corporation’s  dermal  scaffold  product,  as  well  as  for  the  build  out  of  its  sales  and  marketing  teams.  From  2011  through  2014,  Mr.  Hague  was  Vice
President Sales, Marketing, and Commercial Operations for Sanofi Biosurgery’s Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine group. In this role, Mr. Hague was responsible for the
global commercial operations of the group’s products in the orthopedic sports medicine and burn markets. Prior to this, Mr. Hague was the Senior Director and Head of Sales for
Genzyme  Biosurgery  where  he  headed  the  U.S.  sales  team  in  the  orthopedics  and  sports  medicine  market.  Mr.  Hague  holds  a  B.S.  in  marketing  from  the  University  of
Connecticut.

Paul E. Mann, age 44, served as the Healthcare Portfolio Manager for Highbridge Capital Management from August 2016 until he joined the PolarityTE as Chief
Financial Officer in June 2018. From August 2013 to March 2016, Mr. Mann served as an analyst with Soros Fund Management. Prior to joining Soros Fund Management, Mr.
Mann was an analyst and portfolio manager with Lodestone Natural Resources and UBS from September 2011 to March 2013. Prior to moving to the buy-side, Mr. Mann spent
11 years as a sell-side analyst at Morgan Stanley and Deutsche Bank. He started his career as a research scientist at Proctor and Gamble and he has an MA (Cantab) and an
MEng in Chemical Engineering from Cambridge University. Mr. Mann is a CFA charter holder.

Cameron Hoyler, age 36, was appointed General Counsel in April 2017, EVP Corporate Development & Strategy in May 2018, and Secretary in September 2018.
Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Hoyler was an attorney at King & Spalding LLP, where he practiced in the Life Sciences and Product Liability groups from September 2012
to April 2017. Mr. Hoyler represented and counseled clients involved in disputes and transactions in a variety of settings, including product liability, employment, commercial,
trademark, real estate, and insurance coverage. While at King & Spalding LLP, Mr. Hoyler devoted the vast majority of his practice to representing clients in the pharmaceutical
and medical device industries, including Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, and McKesson Corporation, in addition to working for clients in
other highly regulated  industries,  such  as  Chevron  U.S.A.  Inc.  and  Monsanto  Company.  From  September  2010  to  September  2012,  Mr.  Hoyler  practiced  at  the  law  firm  of
Filice, Brown, Eassa & McLeod, where his practice included product liability, premises liability, employment, and insurance-related matters. He earned his Bachelor of Arts
from the University of Pennsylvania, and his Juris Doctor from the University of San Francisco School of Law.

61

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, executive officers, and stockholders who own more than 10% of the Company’s stock to file
forms with the SEC to report their ownership of the Company’s stock and any changes in ownership. The Company assists its directors and executives by identifying reportable
transactions of which it is aware and preparing and filing the forms on their behalf. All persons required to file forms with the SEC must also send copies of the forms to the
Company. We have reviewed all forms provided to us. Based on that review and on written information given to us by our executive officers and directors, we believe that all
Section 16(a) filings during the past fiscal year were filed on a timely basis and that all directors, executive officers and 10% beneficial owners have fully complied with such
requirements during the past fiscal year, except that: Cameron Hoyler filed one report on Form 4 one day late, and Peter Cohen, Jeffrey Dyer, and Willie Bogan each failed to
file a Form 4 reporting the vesting of restricted stock units, which was subsequently reported by each of them in a Form 5 filing.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted Code of Business Ethics and Practices that applies to every employee, officer, and director. Our Code of Business Ethics and Practices is publicly

available, and can be found on our website at http://www.polarityte.com/ by clicking on the link to “Investor Relations” and the link to “Governance.”

Procedure for Recommending Directors

There has not been a material change to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees for election to our Board since August 17, 2018, the date

we filed our Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of stockholders held on September 20, 2018.

Audit Committee

Our Board has a standing Audit Committee. The Board has affirmatively determined the Audit Committee is composed of independent directors, as independence is
defined for members of an audit committee in the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) adopted under the Exchange Act. The members of the Audit
Committee are Rainer Erdtmann, Peter A. Cohen, and Jeff Dyer. The Board has determined that Rainer Erdtmann meets the qualification requirements of an audit committee
financial expert as defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K.

62

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Summary Compensation Table

The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth summary information as to compensation paid or accrued to our named executive officers during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2019, the two-month period ended December 31, 2018, and the 12-month period ended October 31, 2018. Our named executive officers include our
principal executive officer and the two most highly compensated executive officers other than the principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers at the end
of the last completed fiscal year. There is no individual who was not serving as an executive officer at the end of the last completed fiscal year who served as an executive
officer during the last completed fiscal year and would have been one of the two most highly compensated executive officers had the individual been serving at the end of the
fiscal year.

Name and
Principal Position

David Seaburg
President

Richard Hague
Chief Operating Officer

Paul E. Mann
Chief Financial Officer

Denver Lough
Former Chief Executive
Officer

Period
(1)

Salary
($)

Bonus 
($)

Stock
Awards
($)(2)

Option
Awards
($)(2)

All Other
Compensation
($)

Total 
($)

2019
2018
2018

2019

2019
2018
2018

2019
2018
2018

265,000(3)
6,667(5)
9,238(5)

-0- 
-0- 
-0- 

1,864,248(3)

-0- 

1,347,600(6)

2,860,000 
-0- 
-0- 

15,163(4)
-0- 
-0- 

5,004,411 
6,667 
1,356,838 

273,231(7)

30,000(8)  

1,745,047(7)

501,123 

74,306(9)

2,623,707 

401,538(10)  
66,667 
133,846 

-0- 
-0- 
75,666 

1,412,428(10)  
-0- 
3,971,124 

-0- 
-0- 
9,682,330 

4,938 

346,538 
88,333 
448,462 

-0- 
-0- 
1,010,000 

766,000(11)  
-0- 
2,395,050 

-0- 
-0- 
9,860,825 

3,008,443(11)  

1,818,904 
66,667 
13,862,967 

4,120,981 
88,333 
13,714,337 

(1) For each person listed the top row is the compensation for the 12-month period ended December 31, 2019, the middle row is the compensation for the two-month period
ended December 31, 2018, and the bottom row is the compensation for the 12-month period ended October 31, 2018. Richard Hague joined us in April 2019, so there is no
compensation to report for prior periods.
(2) The figures in these columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value for restricted stock and option awards, respectively, granted during the reported periods computed
in  accordance  with  FASB ASC  Topic  718.  See  Note  13  to  our  consolidated  financial  statements  presented  in  this Annual  Report  for  details  as  to  the  assumptions  used  to
determine the grant date fair value of the restricted stock and option awards.
(3) Effective July 1, 2019, Mr. Seaburg agreed to reduce his salary from an annual base salary of $325,000 to an annual base salary of $162,500 for a two-year period ending
June 30, 2021. (See the discussion under the “Narrative Disclosure to Compensation Table,” below.) In exchange for the reduction in salary Mr. Seaburg was granted 114,305
shares of common stock restricted from transfer by reference to continued employment by the Company, and the restriction on transfer lapses with respect to 38,012 shares in
March 2020 and the remainder in quarterly installments through June 2021. The salary figure includes $82,500 for the salary that Mr. Seaburg agreed to forego for 2019 in
exchange for restricted shares of common stock. Mr. Seaburg will forego an additional $162,500 in 2020 and $80,000 in 2021. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock
granted to Mr. Seaburg was $638,596, so the difference between that value and the total amount of salary he agreed to forego over two years is $313,596. The figure in the Stock
Awards column of the table includes the total grant date fair value of the restricted shares granted for salary less the $82,500 of salary that Mr. Seaburg agreed to forego in 2019.
The salary amount also includes $9,713 of consulting fees paid to Mr. Seaburg prior to his employment on a full-time basis in March 2019.
(4) This figure includes $15,163 of rental fees we pay for an apartment Mr. Seaburg uses in Salt Lake City.
(5) These amounts are consulting fees we paid to Mr. Seaburg under a consulting agreement we agreed to in August 2018.
(6) This is figure is the grant date fair value of 60,000 restricted shares granted to Mr. Seaburg in August 2018 under our consulting agreement with him. When Mr. Seaburg
joined us as a full-time employee, the forfeiture restrictions on 15,000 shares with a value of $336,900 had lapsed and were retained by Mr. Seaburg, and the remaining 45,000
restricted shares were forfeited.

63

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(7) Effective July 1, 2019, Mr. Hague agreed to reduce his salary from an annual base salary of $370,000 to an annual base salary of $185,000 for a two-year period ending June
30, 2021. (See the discussion under the “Narrative Disclosure to Compensation Table,” below.) In exchange for the reduction in salary Mr. Hague was granted 129,825 shares of
common stock restricted from transfer by reference to continued employment by the Company, and the restriction on transfer lapsed with respect to 21,638 shares in 2019 and
will lapse on the remaining shares in quarterly installments from March 2020 through June 2021. The salary figure includes $93,923 for the salary that Mr. Hague agreed to
forego for 2019 in exchange for restricted shares of common stock. Mr. Hague will forego an additional $185,000 in 2020 and $91,077 in 2021. The grant date fair value of the
restricted stock granted to Mr. Hague was $727,020, so the difference between that value and the total amount of salary he agreed to forego over two years is $357,020. The
figure in the Stock Awards column of the table includes the total grant date fair value of the restricted shares granted for salary less the $93,923 of salary Mr. Hague agreed to
forego in 2019.
(8) We agreed to pay Mr. Hague a signing bonus of $30,000.
(9) This figure includes $74,268 of relocation expenses we agreed to pay for Mr. Hague.
(10) Effective July 1, 2019, Mr. Mann agreed to reduce his salary from an annual base salary of $400,000 to an annual base salary of $200,000 for a two-year period ending
June 30, 2021. (See the discussion under the “Narrative Disclosure to Compensation Table,” below.) In exchange for the reduction in salary Mr. Mann was granted 140,351
shares of common stock restricted from transfer by reference to continued employment by the Company, and the restriction on transfer lapses with respect to 52,631 shares in
March  2020  and  the  remainder  in  quarterly  installments  through  June  2021.  The  salary  figure  includes  $101,538  for  the  salary  that  Mr.  Mann  agreed  to  forego  for  2019  in
exchange for restricted shares of common stock. Mr. Mann will forego an additional $200,000 in 2020 and $98,462 in 2021. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock
granted to Mr. Mann was $785,966, so the difference between that value and the total amount of salary he agreed to forego over two years is $385,966. The figure in the Stock
Awards column of the table includes the total grant date fair value of the restricted shares granted for salary less the $101,538 of salary that Mr. Mann agreed to forego in 2019.
(11) On August 21, 2019, we reached a settlement with Dr. Denver Lough in connection with the end of his employment with us. The figure under the Stock Awards column of
the table is the grant date fair value of 200,000 shares granted as stock awards in the settlement, which are issuable in 18 monthly installments beginning October 1, 2019. The
figure under the All Other Compensation column in the table includes $3,000,000 in cash we agreed to pay in the settlement, of which $1,500,000 was paid on October 1, 2019,
and the remainder payable in 18 monthly installments beginning November 1, 2019.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table

David Seaburg’s Employment Agreement

In August 2018 David Seaburg was elected by the Board to serve as a director of the Company. Subsequently the Company entered into a written consulting agreement
with Mr. Seaburg pursuant to which he agreed to provide investor relations and other services to the Company over a period of two years for a fee consisting of (i) quarter-
annual cash payment of $10,000, (ii) 60,000 restricted stock units issued under the Company equity incentive plan that vest in four equal installments every six months during
the term of the agreement subject to continued service, and (iii) an annual award under the Company equity incentive plan of options exercisable over a term of 10 years to
purchase common stock in number equal to the number of shares of common stock with a value of $150,000 at the time of the award based on a Black-Scholes calculation. The
agreement terminated effective March 11, 2019, when he joined the Company as President of Corporate Development. In August 2019 he was elected President.

The new employment agreement with Mr. Seaburg was effective in March 2019, and was subsequently amended on June 28, 2019. The agreement has an initial term
that expires on June 30, 2021, and automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless either party provides the other party with written notice of his or its intention not
to renew at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the current term. Mr. Seaburg’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $325,000 from inception to June
30, 2019, $162,500 from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2021, and $325,000 for any renewal term after June 30, 2021. Mr. Seaburg is eligible for an annual bonus of up to 40%
of his base salary as determined at the discretion of the Board. Mr. Seaburg was also granted under the Company’s 2019 Equity Incentive Plan an option to purchase 250,000
shares of Company common stock at a price of $16.50 per share, which vests subject to continued employment in 24 equal monthly installments beginning April 1, 2019, and a
restricted stock award representing the right to receive a total of 40,000 shares of common stock that vests, subject to continued employment, in four installments every six
months beginning on September 1, 2019. At the time his agreement was amended in June 2019, Mr. Seaburg was granted 114,305 shares of common stock restricted from
transfer  by  reference  to  continued  employment  by  the  Company,  and  the  restriction  on  transfer  lapses  with  respect  to  38,012  shares  in  March  2020  and  the  remainder  in
quarterly  installments  through  June  2021.  Mr.  Seaburg  is  entitled  to  participate  in  the  Company’s  insurance  and  benefit  plans  on  the  same  basis  as  other  employees  of  the
Company.

64

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Richard Hague’s Employment Agreement

Richard Hague joined us as Chief Operating Officer in April 2019. The employment agreement with Mr. Hague was effective in April 2019 and subsequently amended
on June 28, 2019. The agreement has an initial term that expires on June 30, 2021, and automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless either party provides the
other party with written notice of his or its intention not to renew at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the current term. Mr. Hague’s employment agreement provides for an
annual base salary of $370,000 from inception to June 30, 2019, $185,000 from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2021, and $370,000 for any renewal term after June 30, 2021.
Mr. Hague is eligible for an annual bonus as determined at the discretion of the Board, with a target of 50% of the base salary. The Company agreed to pay Mr. Hague a signing
bonus of $30,000 in two equal installments on the effective date of the engagement and September 1, 2019. On the effective date of his engagement, Mr. Hague was granted
under the Company’s 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (a) an option to purchase 65,000 shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $10.82 per share that vests subject
to continued employment in 24 equal monthly installments beginning May 8, 2019, and (b) a restricted stock award representing the right to receive a total of 35,000 shares of
common stock that vests, subject to continued employment, in four installments every six months beginning on October 8, 2019. At the time his agreement was amended in June
2019, Mr. Hague was granted 129,825 shares of common stock restricted from transfer by reference to continued employment by the Company, of which the restriction on
transfer lapsed with respect to 21,638 shares in 2019 and will lapse on the remaining shares in quarterly installments from March 2020 through June 2021. Mr. Hague is entitled
to participate in the Company’s insurance and benefit plans on the same basis as other employees of the Company.

Paul E. Mann’s Employment Agreement

We have a written employment agreement with Mr. Mann dated May 12, 2018, which was effective on June 20, 2018, and subsequently amended on June 28, 2019.
The agreement has an initial term that expires on June 30, 2012, and automatically renews for successive one-year periods unless either party provides the other party with
written notice of his or its intention not to renew at least three months prior to the expiration of the current term. Mr. Mann’s employment agreement provides for an annual base
salary of $400,000 from inception to June 30, 2019, $200,000 from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2021, and $400,000 for any renewal term after June 30, 2021. He is eligible
to receive a discretionary annual bonus up to 100% of his base salary as determined at the discretion of the Board. On the effective date of his engagement, Mr. Mann was
granted under the Company’s 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (a) an option to purchase 350,000 shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $31.88 that vests subject
to continued employment in 24 equal monthly installments beginning July 20, 2018, and (b) a restricted stock award representing the right to receive a total of 100,000 shares of
common stock that vests, subject to continued employment, in four installments every six months beginning December 20, 2018. At the time his agreement was amended in
June  2019,  Mr.  Mann  was  granted  140,351  shares  of  common  stock  restricted  from  transfer  by  reference  to  continued  employment  by  the  Company,  and  the  restriction  on
transfer lapses with respect to 52,631 shares in March 2020 and the remainder in quarterly installments through June 2021.

65

 
 
 
 
 
 
Denver Lough’s Employment Agreement

We had a written Employment Agreement with Denver Lough dated November 10, 2017 (the “Lough Agreement”), which was terminated on August 21, 2019. We
paid Dr. Lough a bonus of $150,000 when we signed the Employment Agreement. Dr. Lough’s base salary was $530,000 per year, and he was eligible to receive a bonus in the
amount of 100% of annual salary, as may have been determined from time to time by the Board in its discretion, and was eligible to participate in any equity-based incentive
compensation plan or program we adopted.

On August 12, 2019, we received from Dr. Lough a written demand claiming that actions taken by the Board to place him on administrative leave, and deprive him of
the  authority  to  grant  salary  raises  to  employees,  approve  capital  expenditures,  engage  outside  consultants  or  advisors,  and  supervise  the  legal  department  constituted  the
assignment of duties that were substantially different from, or that resulted in a substantial diminution of the duties originally assigned to him as Chief Executive Officer, giving
him  grounds  to  terminate  for  “good  reason”  the  Lough Agreement  and  demanding  the  foregoing  actions  be  rescinded  within  30  days.  On August  21,  2019,  we  reached  a
settlement  resolving  Dr.  Lough’s  demand  and  his  status,  which  included  termination  of  the  Employment Agreement  on August  21,  2019,  except  for  specific  sections  that
survive termination, including sections pertaining to (i) non-disclosure of confidential information, (ii) non-competition and non-solicitation, and (iii) indemnification related to
service to the Company. The following are the principal terms of the settlement agreement relating to his compensation:

● Dr. Lough will be paid $1,500,000 in cash on October 1, 2019 and paid an additional $1,500,000 payable in equal monthly installments beginning  November  1,

2019 and ending April 1, 2021,

● All salary under the Employment Agreement ended as of the effective date of his resignation as an officer and director on August 26, 2019,
● We will award to Dr. Lough 200,000 restricted stock units that vest in 18 equal monthly installments beginning October 1, 2019,
● All restricted stock units and options to purchase common stock previously granted to Dr. Lough that were unvested on August 26, 2019, ceased to vest on that date,

and

● Dr. Lough is entitled to receive a 5% participation payment on profits generated from commercial transactions (sales or licenses to third parties) associated with
U.S. Patent Application No. 14/954,335 and PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/063114  on and following the final issuance by the USPTO of a
United States Patent under U.S. Patent Application No. 14/954,335, all as determined pursuant to the terms and conditions in Section 6(B) of the EEA.

Dr.  Lough  has  advised  us  that  he  believes  the  settlement  between  the  parties  includes  an  agreement  to  modify  his  equity  awards  previously  granted  under  the
Company’s 2017 Equity Incentive Plan to accelerate vesting of all awards and extend the exercise period for the stock options to ten years from the original grant date. We
advised Dr. Lough we do not agree that modification to his equity awards was included in the settlement or agreed to by the parties.

66

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-In-Control

Termination Payments

Under our employment agreements with Messrs. Seaburg and Hague we agreed to pay each of them their monthly base salary for a period of nine months following
termination by us without “cause.” Our obligation to make any such payments is subject to receiving from the executive a written release, in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to us, whereby the executive waives any and all claims the executive may have against PolarityTE and its affiliates.

Under the agreements, “cause” means any of the following, as determined by the Board in its reasonable judgment: (i) the commission by the executive of any felony
(or any crime involving fraud or moral turpitude or otherwise having a material adverse effect on the Company or any of its affiliates); (ii) theft, conversion, embezzlement or
misappropriation by the executive of funds or other assets of the Company or any of its affiliates or any other act involving fraud or dishonesty with respect to the Company
(including acceptance of any bribes or kickbacks or other acts of self-dealing); (iii) intentional, grossly negligent or unlawful misconduct by the executive which causes harm to
the  Company  or  its  affiliates  or  exposes  the  Company  or  its  affiliates  to  a  substantial  risk  of  harm;  (iv)  the  violation  by  the  executive  of  any  law  regarding  employment
discrimination or sexual harassment as reasonably determined by the Board after a reasonable investigation into any allegation, charge or lawsuit (and not merely based solely
on  the  existence  of  such  allegation,  charge  or  lawsuit);  (v)  the  failure  by  Executive  to  comply  with  any  material  policy  generally  applicable  to  Company  employees;  (vi)
Executive’s repeated failure to follow the reasonable directives of the chief executive officer; (vii) the failure to devote full business time to the Company’s affairs; (viii) any
other material breach by the executive of the employment agreement or any other agreement or policy relating to employment with the Company or applicable to the executive
(including  the  failure  by  the  executive  to  devote  adequate  on-site  time  at  the  Company’s  principal  offices);  or  (ix)  the  Company’s  discovery  that,  prior  to  the  executive’s
employment, he engaged in any conduct prohibited by clauses (i) through (iv) immediately above.

Change in Control Plan

On August 6, 2019, the Board adopted a change in control compensation plan for our named executive officers and other senior executives. The plan provides that our
executive officers that have been employed the Company for at least 90 days shall receive severance benefits upon the involuntary termination of their employment within six
months after a change of control. A change in control occurs if, after the adoption of the plan: (i) any person (other than Denver Lough) acquires beneficial ownership of 30% or
more  of  either  the  then-outstanding  shares  of  our  common  stock,  or  the  combined  voting  power  of  our  then-outstanding  voting  securities  entitled  to  vote  generally  in  the
election of directors; (ii) persons who currently constitute the Board cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; or (iii) consummation of a reorganization,
merger or consolidation, or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, or our acquisition of assets or stock of another entity, in each case, unless, (a) all or
substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners of either the outstanding shares of our common stock, or the combined voting power of our
outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors immediately prior to the transaction beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 80% of,
respectively, our then-outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of our then-outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors, as the case may be, of the corporation resulting from the transaction, (b) no person beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of, respectively, the then-
outstanding  shares  of  common  stock  of  the  corporation  resulting  from  the  transaction,  or  the  combined  voting  power  of  the  then-outstanding  voting  securities  of  such
corporation  except  to  the  extent  that  such  ownership  existed  prior  to  the  transaction,  and  (c)  at  least  a  majority  of  the  members  of  the  board  of  directors  of  the  corporation
resulting from the transaction were members of the Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement, or of the action of the Board, providing for the transaction.

67

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For any participant in the plan who is designated as the Chief Operating Officer (currently Richard Hague), President (currently David Seaburg), or Chief Financial
Officer (currently Paul Mann), the plan provides for a payment equal to the sum of 1.5 multiplied by the greater of $400,000 or base annual salary, and 1.5 multiplied by the
greater of $400,000 or the target bonus established in an annual executive target bonus plan in effect on the Termination Date. For any other participant, the plan provides for a
payment equal to the sum of 1.0 multiplied by the greater of $350,000 or base annual salary, and 1.0 multiplied by the greater of $350,000 or the target bonus established in an
annual executive target bonus plan in effect on the Termination Date.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table shows grants of stock options and grants of unvested stock awards outstanding on the last day of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, to each

of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table.

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable (#)
(1)

Option Awards
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)(1)

Option
Exercise
Price
($)

93,750 

156,250 

16.5   

Option
Expiration
Date
3-11-2029

21,666 

43,334 

10.82   

4-8-2029

262,500 
13,541 

87,500 
8,125 

$
$

31.88   
20.12   

6-20-2028
9-20-2028

Stock Awards

Number
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)

Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock
That Have Not
Vested
($)(2)

30,000   
114,035   
175,000   

26,250   
108,187   
175,000   

25,000   
5,833   
140,351   
175,000   

166,667   
-   
-   

$
$

$

78,000 
296,491 
455,000 

68,250 
281,286 
455,000 

65,000 
15,166 
364,913 
455,000 

433,334 
- 
- 

Name
David
Seaburg

Richard
Hague

Paul E.
Mann

Denver
Lough

Option
Grant Date
3-11-2019
7-1-2019
8-6-2019

4-8-2019
7-1-2019
8-6-2019

6-20-2018
9-20-2018
7-1-2019
8-6-2019

8-26-2019

(1) All stock options listed vest in 24 monthly installments beginning one month following the grant date.
(2) Market value is based on closing stock price of $2.60 on December 31, 2019

68

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board Compensation

The following table shows the total compensation paid or accrued during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, to each of our current and former directors, except

for David Seaburg whose compensation information is presented in the executive summary compensation table, below.

Name

Peter A. Cohen
Jeff Dyer
Jon Mogford
Minnie Baylor-Henry
Willie C. Bogan
Rainer Erdtmann
Steve Gorlin(3)

Fees Earned
or
Paid in Cash
($)

Stock
Awards
($)(1)(4)

Option
Awards
($)(1)(4)

All Other
Compensation
($)

Total
($)

55,000   
61,000   
57,000   
37,500   
55,000   
32,500   
39,194   

17,355 
64,834(2) 
72,222(2) 
12,574 
-0- 
-0- 
123,628(2) 

-0-   
-0-   
-0-   
-0-   
-0-   
27,422   
-0-   

-0- 
53,363(2) 
63,492(2) 
-0- 
-0- 
-0- 
101,755(2) 

59,310 
179,197 
197,714 
50,074 
55,000 
59,922 
264,576 

(1) The figures in these columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value for restricted stock and option awards, respectively, granted during fiscal years 2019 computed in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements presented in this Annual Report for details as to the assumptions used to determine
the grant date fair value of the restricted stock and option awards.
(2)  In  2017  and  2018  we  did  not  provide  Jeff  Dyer,  Jon  Mogford,  and  Steve  Gorlin  with  correct  information  on  tax  reporting  for  equity  awards  and  the  corresponding  tax
liability, which resulted in substantial tax liability and diminution in the value of the compensation paid. As reparations for the lost value we agreed to grant to Jeff Dyer 15,585
restricted stock units, Jon Morford 18,563 restricted stock units, and Steve Gorlin 29,718 restricted stock units, and pay cash compensation to each of them in the amounts listed
in the “All Other Compensation” column.
(3) The service of Mr. Gorlin as a director of the Company ended August 26, 2019.
(4) The following table shows the aggregate number of stock option awards and unvested restricted stock awards outstanding on the last day of the fiscal year ended December
31, 2019, for each of the directors named in the director compensation table.

Name
Peter Cohen

Jon Mogford

Jeff Dyer

Willie Bogan

Minnie Baylor- Henry

Rainer Erdtmann

  Stock Option Awards    
8,624   

Stock
Awards

68,268   

139,624   

8,624   

19,329   

69,171   

9,280 

-- 

-- 

7,500 

7,273 

-- 

2019 Director Compensation

For the calendar year ended December 31, 2019, non-employee directors were compensated as follows:

Each non-employee director received an annual cash retainer of $45,000;
The non-executive Chairman of the Board received an annual fee of $22,500;

●
●
● Our Audit Committee Chairman received an annual fee of $20,000, our Compensation Committee Chairman received an annual fee of $15,000, and our Nominating

and Governance Committee Chairman received an annual fee of $10,000;

69

 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
● Non-chair members of our Audit Committee received an annual fee of $9,000, our Compensation Committee members received an annual fee of $7,000, and of our

●

Nominating and Governance Committee members received an annual fee of $5,000; and
Each non-employee  director  was  granted  an  annual  equity  award  with  a  value  of  $175,000  determined  under  the  Black-Scholes  formula, which  may  be  issued
entirely in stock options exercisable over 10 years that vest, subject to continuing service, in 12 monthly installments beginning one month after the grant date, or
65% in stock options and 35% restricted stock units that vest, subject to continuing service, in a lump sum one year after the grant date.

All cash fees were payable in quarterly installments. Beginning with the fourth calendar quarter of 2019, each non-employee director may, at his or her option, elect by
written  notice  given  to  the  Company  prior  to  the  end  of  each  calendar  quarter  to  take  in  lieu  of  cash  for  all  or  a  portion  of  the  non-employee  director’s  cash  compensation
payable for the next calendar quarter the equivalent value in stock options that vest monthly in three installments beginning one month following the grant date exercisable for a
term of 10 years, restricted shares that vest monthly in three installments beginning one month following the grant date; or a combination of the foregoing.

2020 Director Compensation

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2020, non-employee directors will be compensated as follows:

Each non-employee director will receive an annual cash retainer of $45,000;
The Chairman of the Board will receive an annual fee of $80,000 paid quarterly in equity awards;

●
●
● Our Audit  Committee  Chairman  will  receive  an  annual  fee  of  $20,000,  our  Compensation  Committee  Chairman  will  receive  an  annual fee  of  $15,000,  and  our

Nominating and Governance Committee Chairman will receive an annual fee of $10,000;

● Non-chair members of our Audit Committee will receive an annual fee of $9,000, our Compensation Committee members will receive an annual fee of $7,000, and

●

of our Nominating and Governance Committee members received an annual fee of $5,000; and
Each non-employee director will be granted an annual equity award with a value of $80,000 determined under the Black-Scholes formula, which  may  be  issued
entirely in stock options exercisable over 10 years that vest, subject to continuing service, in 12 monthly installments beginning one month after the grant date, or
65% in stock options and 35% restricted stock awards that vest, subject to continuing service, in 12 monthly installments beginning one month after the grant date,
or 100% in restricted stock awards that vest, subject to continuing service, in 12 monthly installments beginning one month after the grant date.

All cash fees are payable in quarterly installments. Not less than three business days prior to the last business day of each calendar quarter a non-employee director
may elect by written notice to the Company to take in lieu of cash for all or a portion of the non-employee director’s cash compensation payable for the next calendar quarter the
equivalent value determined using the Black-Scholes formula (as applicable) in the form of stock options that vest monthly in three installments beginning one month following
the grant date exercisable for a term of 10 years, restricted stock awards that vest monthly in three installments beginning one month following the grant date, or a combination
of the foregoing.

70

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of the common stock of the Company as of February 29, 2020 by (i) each person known
to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock, (ii) each of the Company’s current directors and nominees for director, (iii) each
individual who meets the definition of “named executive officer” under SEC regulations, and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. The number of
shares of common stock beneficially owned by each person is determined under rules promulgated by the SEC. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to
which the person has sole or shared voting power or investment power, and also includes any shares that the person has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date as of
which the beneficial ownership determination is made. Applicable percentages are based upon 38,320,161 voting shares issued and outstanding as of February 29, 2020, and
treating any shares that the holder has the right to acquire within 60 days as outstanding for purposes of computing their percent ownership. Except as otherwise indicated, each
of the stockholders listed below has sole voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.

Executive Officers and Directors (1):

Peter A. Cohen
Jeff Dyer
Jon Mogford
Minnie Baylor-Henry
Willie C. Bogan
Rainer Erdtmann
David Seaburg
Paul Mann
Richard Hague

Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (9 persons)

Greater that 5% Holders:

Denver Lough (2)(4) 
1287 E. 530 North, Orem, UT 84097

Barry Honig (3)(4) 
555 S. Federal Hwy, #450, Boca Raton, FL 33432

Number of 
Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially 
Owned

Percentage of
Common Stock

127,502   
192,640   
149,523   
22,864   
44,711   
121,312   
487,569   
750,461   
331,478   

2,228,060   

7,127,112   

2,278,114   

0.3 
0.5 
0.4 
0.1 
0.1 
0.3 
1.3 
1.9 
0.9 

5.7 

18.6 

5.9 

(1) Includes the following number of shares of options that were exercisable or restricted share awards expected to vest within 60 days of February 29, 2020: Peter A. Cohen,
23,303;  Jeff  Dyer,  148,226;  Jon  Mogford,  73,396;  Minnie  Baylor-Henry,  12,814;  Willie  C.  Bogan,  15,002;  Rainer  Erdtmann,  71,312;  David  Seaburg,  144,868;  Paul  Mann,
340,901; and Richard Hague, 35,833.
(2) The stock information for Dr. Lough is based on the most recent Form 4 filed by Dr. Lough with the SEC, which shows direct common stock ownership of 7,104,890 shares.
The figure for Dr. Lough includes an additional 22,222 common shares issuable to Dr. Lough within 60 days under the terms of the stock award granted under the settlement
with Dr. Lough in August 2019.

71

 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
(3) The stock information for Mr. Honig is based on information contained in an amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December
13, 2019. As stated in that filing, the shares listed for Mr. Honig include (i) 1,296,800 shares of common stock held by Twipee Incorporated (“Twipee”), (ii) 483,054 shares of
common  stock  held  by  GRQ  Consultants,  Inc.  Roth  401K  FBO  Barry  Honig  (“Roth  401K”),  (iii)  434,952  shares  of  common  stock  held  by  GRQ  Consultants,  Inc.  401K
(“401K”), (iv) 49,308 shares of common stock held by GRQ Consultants, Inc. Roth 401K FBO Renee Honig (“Renee 401K”) and (v) 14,000 shares of common stock held by
GRQ Consultants, Inc. (“GRQ Inc.”). Barry Honig’s father, Alan S. Honig (“Alan Honig”), and Barry Honig’s wife, Renee Honig (“Renee Honig”), are co-trustees of each of
401K, Roth 401K and Renee 401K. Alan Honig, is the President of each of GRQ Inc. and Twipee. Renee Honig is the sole shareholder and Secretary of Twipee. Both Alan
Honig and Renee Honig are directors of Twipee. By virtue of his current relationship with his father with regard to the shares of common stock held by 401K, Roth 401K,
Renee 410K, GRQ Inc. and Twipee, and the spousal relationship with his wife with regard to the shares of common stock held by 401K, Roth 401K, Renee 401K and Twipee,
Barry Honig may have influence on all of the shares of common stock held by each of 401K, Roth 401K, Renee 401K, GRQ Inc. and Twipee, and may be deemed, directly or
indirectly, to have beneficial ownership of all such shares of common stock.

The following table provides information on our compensation plans at December 31, 2019 under which equity securities are authorized for issuance.

Plan category
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (1)

Total

(a)
Number of securities to
be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights

4,374,988   
155,000   
 4,529,988   

(b)
Weighted-
average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights    
15.45   
$
$
10.13   
$

(c)
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuances
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))

5,353,257 
-0- 
5,353,257 

(1) These plans are individual grants of stock options to one consultant and four employees in connection with their engagement or employment by us. Each stock option vests
in 24 monthly installments subject to continued engagement or employment. The grant date, number of shares, and exercise price for each stock option granted are as follows:

Grant Date
02/28/2017
03/10/2017
04/05/2017
04/10/2017
04/10/2017

No. of Shares
50,000
10,000
75,000
10,000
10,000

72

Exercise Price
$ 4.72
$ 6.57
$13.12
$14.25
$14.25

 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.

Director Independence

Our Board is currently comprised of six members. The Board has reviewed the materiality of any relationship that each of our directors has with the Company, either
directly  or  indirectly.  Based  upon  this  review,  the  Board  has  determined  that  Peter A.  Cohen,  Jeff  Dyer,  Dr.  Jon  Mogford,  Willie  C.  Bogan,  Rainer  Erdtmann  and  Minnie
Baylor-Henry are “independent directors” as defined by the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

In October 2018, we entered into an office lease with Lefrak SBN Limited Partnership covering approximately 7,250 square feet of rental space in the building located
at 40 West 57 th Street in New York City. The lease is for a term of three years. The annual lease rate is $60 per square foot. Initially we will occupy and pay for only 3,275
square feet of space, and we are not obligated under the lease to pay for the remaining 3,975 square feet covered by the lease unless we elect to occupy that additional space.
Comparable annual lease rates for similar office space in the area range between $67 and $110 per square foot. We believe the terms of the lease are very favorable to us, and we
obtained these favorable terms through the efforts of Peter A. Cohen, a director, which he provided so that the company he owns, Peter A. Cohen, LLC (“Cohen LLC”), could
sublease a portion of the office space.

Initially, we are using three offices and two workstations in the office and share common areas representing approximately 2,055 square feet. Cohen LLC is using
approximately  1,220  square  feet.  The  monthly  lease  payment  for  3,275  square  feet  is  $16,377.  Of  this  amount  $6,103  is  allocated  pro  rata  to  Cohen  LLC  based  on  square
footage occupied. Additional lease charges for operating expenses and taxes are allocated under the sublease based on the ratio of rent paid by us and Cohen LLC to total rent.

Cohen LLC identified two associated entities that may wish to occupy an additional 2,753 square feet of space in the office. Under the terms of the sublease Cohen
LLC can add this additional space to the 1,220 square feet occupied, which would bring the total space occupied by us and Cohen LLC to 6,028 square feet. Because a portion
of the additional space subleased to Cohen LLC is less private and attractive, we agreed to reduce the overall annual lease rate for the Cohen LLC space to $58.60 per square
foot, which means we will be paying an annual lease rate for the space we use of $62.70. Assuming Cohen LLC subleases the additional office space, our annual lease payment
to the lessor would be $361,680, and Cohen LLC would pay to us $232,830 under the sublease.

 Item 14 - Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The following table sets forth the fees billed by EisnerAmper LLP (“EisnerAmper”), for the year ended December 31, 2019, the two-month period ended December

31, 2018, and the fiscal year ended October 31, 2018, for the categories of services indicated.

Audit Fees
Audit Related Fees
Tax Fees
Other Fees
Total Fees

Year Ended 
December 31, 2019 ($)

Two Months Ended
12/31/18 ($)

Year Ended 
October 31, 2018 ($)

604,467 
— 
— 
— 
604,467 

73

285,200   
—   
—   
—   
285,200   

485,210 
— 
— 
— 
485,210 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our financial statements and review of interim consolidated financial statements

included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by the principal accountants relating to statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated

financial statements and are not included in audit fees.

Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. These services include preparation of federal and state income

tax returns.

Other fees consist of fees for product and services other than the services reported in the categories described above.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our Audit  Committee  assists  the  Board  in  overseeing  and  monitoring  the  integrity  of  our  financial  reporting  process,  our  compliance  with  legal  and  regulatory
requirements, and the quality of our internal and external audit processes. The role and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in a written charter adopted by the
Board,  which  is  available  on  our  website  at www.polarityte.com. The  Audit  Committee  is  responsible  for  selecting,  retaining,  and  determining  the  compensation  of  our
independent public accountant, approving the services they will perform, and reviewing the performance of the independent public accountant. The Audit Committee reviews
with  management  and  our  independent  public  accountant  our  annual  financial  statements  on  Form  10-K  and  our  quarterly  financial  statements  on  Forms  10-Q.  The Audit
Committee reviews and reassesses the charter annually and recommends any changes to the Board for approval. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our overall
financial reporting process. In fulfilling its responsibilities for the financial statements for fiscal year 2019, the Audit Committee took the following actions:

●
●

●

●

reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, with management and EisnerAmper;
discussed with  EisnerAmper  the  matters  required  to  be  discussed  in  accordance  with  the  rules  set  forth  by  the  Public  Company Accounting  Oversight  Board
(“PCAOB”), relating to the conduct of the audit;
received written  disclosures  and  the  letter  from  EisnerAmper  regarding  its  independence  as  required  by  applicable  requirements  of  the PCAOB  regarding
EisnerAmper’s communications with the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee further discussed with EisnerAmper its independence; and
considered the  status  of  pending  litigation,  taxation  matters,  and  other  areas  of  oversight  relating  to  the  financial  reporting  and  audit process  that  the  Audit
Committee determined appropriate.

Our Audit Committee approved all services that our independent accountants provided to us in the past two fiscal years.

74

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 PART IV

 Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(1) Financial Statements.

The financial statements required by Item 15 are submitted in a separate section of this report, beginning on Page F-1, incorporated herein and made a part hereof.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules.

Schedules have been omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in the financial statements or
notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits.

The following index lists the exhibits that are filed with this report or incorporated by reference, as noted:

3.1
3.2
3.3

3.4

3.5

3.6

3.7
3.8

3.9
3.10
3.11

3.12

3.13

Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 15, 2014).
Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2005).
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the 0% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated  by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 18, 2014)
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the 0% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 30, 2015)
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the 0% Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of Majesco Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2015)
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights for 0% Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form
8-K filed on October 20, 2015)
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 29, 2016)
Form of Certificate of Designation of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 7,
2016)
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 7, 2017)
Articles of Merger (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 7, 2017)
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the 0% Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to our Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on April 7, 2017)
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on September 20, 2017)
Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K  filed with the SEC on November 7,
2019)

75

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3.14

4.1
4.2
4.3

4.4

4.5
4.6
*4.7
#10.1
#10.2
#10.3
#10.4
#10.5
#10.6
#10.7

#10.8
#10.9

Amendment No. 1 to Restated Bylaws dated January 11, 2019, Changing Fiscal Year (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13 to our Form  10-K filed with the SEC on
January 14, 2019)
Form of Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 20, 2017)
Rights Agreement dated November 7, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 7, 2019)
Form of Rights Certificate Agreement dated November 7, 2019, between the Company and Equity Stock Transfer, LLC as rights agent  (incorporated  by  reference  to
Exhibit 4.2 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 7, 2019)
Registration Rights Agreement dated December 5, 2019, between the Company and Keystone Capital Partners, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 5, 2019)
Form of Common Stock Warrant Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020)
Form of Warrant Agency Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020)
Description of Securities
Employment Agreement with David Seaburg (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to our Form 10-KT filed with the SEC on March 18, 2019)
Employment Agreement with Richard Hague (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 10, 2019)
Employment Agreement with Paul Mann (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 14, 2018)
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with David Seaburg (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 8, 2019)
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Richard Hague (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 8, 2019)
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement with Paul Mann (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 8, 2019)
Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Grant and Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated  by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our
Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 8, 2019)
Change in Control Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 12, 2019)
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement – 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 14,
2019)

#10.10 Form of Stock Option Agreement – 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 14, 2019)
#10.11 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement – 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 14,

2019)

#10.12 Form of Stock Option Agreement – 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 14, 2019)
#10.13 PolarityTE (formerly Majesco Entertainment Company) 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on

December 7, 2016)

#10.14 PolarityTE 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our Form S-8 registration Statement filed with the SEC on October 5, 2018)
#10.15 PolarityTE 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to our Form S-8 registration Statement filed with  the  SEC  on  October  5,

2018)

76

 
 
 
#10.16 PolarityTE 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 20, 2019)
*#10.17 Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement – 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
*#10.18 Form of Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement – Non-employee Directors – 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
*#10.19 Form of Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement – Employees – 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
*#10.20 Form of Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement – Consultants – 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
*#10.21 Form of Restricted Stock Award – 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
*#10.22 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award – Non-employee Directors - 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
*#10.23 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award – Employees - 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
#10.24 Employment Agreement with Denver Lough (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 16, 2017)
#10.25 Settlement Terms Agreement dated August 21, 2019, between Denver Lough and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to  our Form 10-Q filed with

10.26

10.27

the SEC on November 12, 2019)
Agreement of Lease between the Company and Lefrak SBN Limited Partnership dated October 19, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to our Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on January 14, 2019)
Sublease Agreement  by  and  between  the  Company  and  Peter  Cohen  LLC  for  office  space  at  40  West  57th  Street,  New  York,  New York  10019  (incorporated  by
reference to Exhibit 10.27 to our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on January 14, 2019)

*10.28 Sublease Agreement with Joseph M. Still Burn Centers, Inc., dated April 22, 2019
10.29

Purchase Agreement dated December 5, 2019 between the Company and Keystone Capital Partners, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on December 5, 2019)
Subsidiaries
Consent of EisnerAmper LLP
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code

*21.1
*23.1
*31.1
*31.2
*31.3
*32.1

XBRL Instance Document

*101.INS
*101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
*101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
*101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
*101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
*101.PRE
*104

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
Cover Page Interactive Data File

#
*

Constitutes a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.
Filed herewith.

77

 
 
 
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the

undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

POLARITYTE, INC.

By:

/s/ David Seaburg
President (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 12, 2020

By:

/s/ Richard Hague
Chief Operating Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 12, 2020

By:

/s/ Paul Mann
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: March 12, 2020

78

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the

capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

  Title

/s/ Peter A. Cohen
Peter A. Cohen

/s/ Jeffrey Dyer
Jeffrey Dyer

/s/ Jon Mogford
Jon Mogford

/s/ Minnie Baylor-Henry
Minnie Baylor-Henry

/s/ Willie C. Bogan
Willie C. Bogan

/s/ Rainer Erdtmann
Rainer Erdtmann

  Chairman of the Board of Directors

  Director

  Director

  Director

  Director

  Director

79

  Date

  March 12, 2020

  March 12, 2020

  March 12, 2020

  March 12, 2020

  March 12, 2020

  March 12, 2020

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
POLARITYTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Financial Statements

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2019, the Two Months Ended December 31, 2018 and the Year Ended October 31, 2018
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Year Ended December 31, 2019, the Two Months Ended December 31, 2018 and the Year Ended October 31,
2018
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Year ended December 31, 2019, the Two Months Ended December 31, 2018 and the Year Ended October 31,
2018
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2019, the Two Months Ended December 31, 2018 and the Year Ended October 31, 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Page
F-1
F-2
F-3

F-4

F-5
F-6
F-7

80

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
PolarityTE, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  PolarityTE,  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries  (the  “Company”)  as  of  December  31,  2019  and  2018  and  the  related
consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period from November 1,
2018  through  December  31,  2018,  and  the  year  ended  October  31,  2018,  and  the  related  notes  (collectively  referred  to  as  the  “financial  statements”).  In  our  opinion,  the
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the consolidated results
of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2018, the transition period from November 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, and the year ended
October 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over
financial  reporting  as  of  December  31,  2018,  based  on  criteria  established  in  the Internal  Control  -  Integrated  Framework (2013)  issued  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated March 12, 2020 expressed an adverse opinion.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases in 2019 due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02 - Leases.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our
audits.  We  are  a  public  accounting  firm  registered  with  the  PCAOB  and  are  required  to  be  independent  with  respect  to  the  Company  in  accordance  with  the  U.S.  federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether  the  financial  statements  are  free  of  material  misstatement,  whether  due  to  error  or  fraud.  Our  audits  included  performing  procedures  to  assess  the  risks  of  material
misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test
basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2010. Partners of Amper, Politziner & Mattia LLP joined EisnerAmper LLP in 2010. Amper, Politziner & Mattia LLP had
served as the Company’s auditor since 2009.

EISNERAMPER LLP
Iselin, New Jersey
March 12, 2020

F-1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 POLARITYTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

ASSETS
Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents
Short-term investments
Accounts receivable, net
Inventory
Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Total current assets

Property and equipment, net
Operating lease right-of-use assets
Intangible assets, net
Goodwill
Other assets
TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Other current liabilities
Current portion of long-term note payable
Deferred revenue

Total current liabilities
Long-term note payable, net
Operating lease liabilities
Other long-term liabilities
Total liabilities

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 17)

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock – 25,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and
2018
Common stock - $.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 27,374,653 and 21,447,088 shares issued
and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018
Additional paid-in capital

Accumulated other comprehensive income
Accumulated deficit
Total stockholders’ equity
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

10,218   
19,022   
1,731   
252   
1,264   
32,487   
14,911   
4,590   
731   
278   
602   
53,599   

7,095   
2,338   
528   
98   
10,059   
–   
2,994   
1,630   
14,683   

–   

27   
474,174   
72   

(435,357)  
38,916   
53,599   

$

55,673 
6,162 
712 
336 
1,432 
64,315 
13,736 
– 
924 
278 
913 
80,166 

6,508 
316 
529 
170 
7,523 
479 
– 
131 
8,133 

– 

21 
414,840 
36 

(342,864)
72,033 
80,166 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-2

 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 POLARITYTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

For the Year Ended
December 31, 2019

For the Two Months Ended    

December 31, 2018

For the Year Ended
October 31, 2018

Net revenues
Products
Services

Total net revenues

Cost of sales
Products
Services

Total costs of sales

Gross profit
Operating costs and expenses
Research and development
General and administrative
Sales and marketing

Total operating costs and expenses

Operating loss

Other income (expense)
Interest income, net
Other income, net
Change in fair value of derivatives
Loss on extinguishment of warrant liability

Loss before income taxes
Benefit for income taxes
Net loss
Deemed dividend – accretion of discount on Series F preferred stock
Deemed dividend – exchange of Series F preferred stock
Cumulative dividends on Series F preferred stock
Net loss attributable to common stockholders

Net loss per share, basic and diluted:
Net loss
Deemed dividend – accretion of discount on Series F preferred stock
Deemed dividend – exchange of Series F preferred stock
Cumulative dividends on Series F preferred stock
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted

$

$

$

$

2,353 
3,299 
5,652 

1,365 
1,114 
2,479 
3,173 

16,397 
63,189 
16,980 
96,566 
(93,393)  

151 
749 
– 
– 

(92,493)  

– 

(92,493)  

– 
– 
– 

(92,493)  

$

(3.70)  
– 
– 
– 
(3.70)  

$

24,966,355 

210   
463   
673   

194   
187   
381   
292   

3,458   
12,639   
2,725   
18,822   
(18,530)  

80   
32   
–   
–   
(18,418)  
–   
(18,418)  
–   
–   
–   
(18,418)  

(0.86)  
–   
–   
–   
(0.86)  
21,343,446   

$

$

$

689 
874 
1,563 

500 
502 
1,002 
561 

19,376 
48,252 
2,365 
69,993 
(69,432)

395 
– 
3,814 
(520)
(65,743)
302 
(65,441)
(1,290)
(7,057)
(373)
(74,161)

(4.29)
(0.09)
(0.46)
(0.02)
(4.86)
15,259,731 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 POLARITYTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(in thousands)

Net loss
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities
Reclassification of realized gain included in net loss
Comprehensive loss

For the Year Ended
December 31, 2019

For the Two Months Ended    

December 31, 2018

For the Year Ended
October 31, 2018

$

$

(92,493)  

$

493 
(457)  
(92,457)  

$

(18,418)  

$

36   
–   
(18,382)  

$

(65,441)

– 
– 
(65,441)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 POLARITYTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Preferred Stock

Common Stock

  Number

3,230,655 

  Amount
  $

109,995 

  Number

6,515,524 

  Amount
  $

Additional

Paid-in  
Capital

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive 
Income

  Accumulated 
Deficit

Total
Stockholders’ 
Equity

7 

  $

149,173 

  $

– 

  $

(259,005)   $

170 

(3,146,671)  

(769)  

713,036 

(47,689)  

(4,020)  

794,820 

(2,578)  

(201)  

59,950 

(26,667)  

(312)  

44,445 

(7,050)  

(104,693)  

7,050,000 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 

  $

  $

  $

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 

1,003,393 
151,871 
161,433 

4,791,819 
126,000 

– 
– 

11,708 
– 
  21,423,999 
– 
23,089 

  $

– 
– 
– 
  21,447,088 

  $

3,473,008 
1,579,919 
292,417 
– 
36,177 
645,473 

(99,429)  

– 
– 
  27,374,653 

  $

1 

1 

– 

– 

7 

1 

– 

4 
– 

– 
– 

– 
– 
21 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
21 

3 
2 
– 
– 
– 
1 

– 
– 
– 
27 

768 

4,019 

201 

312 

104,686 

13,060 
3,045 
687 

92,672 
38,821 

(1,290)  
(373)  

306 
– 
406,087 
8,908 
– 

  $

(155)  
– 
– 
414,840 

  $

28,070 

(2)  

529 
31,440 
99 
(1)  

  $

  $

(801)  
– 
– 
474,174 

  $

  $

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
36 
– 
36 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
36 
– 
72 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 
– 

– 

(65,441)  
(324,446)   $

  $

– 
– 

– 
– 

(18,418)  
(342,864)   $

  $

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 

(92,493)  
(435,357)   $

  $

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

13,061 
3,045 
687 

92,676 
38,821 

(1.290)
(373)

306 
(65,441)
81,662 
8,908 
– 

(155)
36 
(18,418)
72,033 

28,073 
– 
529 
31,440 
99 
– 

(801)
36 
(92,493)
38,916 

Balance - October 31, 2017
Issuance of common stock in connection with:
Conversion of Series A preferred stock to
common stock
Conversion of Series B preferred stock to
common stock
Conversion of Series C preferred stock to
common stock
Conversion of Series D preferred stock to
common stock
Conversion of Series E preferred stock to
common stock

Exchange of Series F preferred stock and
dividends to common stock
Extinguishment of warrant liability
Stock option exercise
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
of $2,785
Stock-based compensation expense
Deemed dividend – accretion of discount on
Series F preferred stock
Cumulative dividends on Series F preferred stock  
Series F preferred stock dividends paid in
common stock
Net loss
Balance - October 31, 2018
Stock-based compensation expense
Vesting of restricted stock units, net
Shares withheld for tax withholding on vesting of
restricted stock

Other comprehensive income
Net loss
Balance - December 31, 2018
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
of $1,147
Issuance of restricted stock awards, net
Stock option exercise
Stock-based compensation expense
Purchase of ESPP shares
Vesting of restricted stock units, net
Shares withheld for tax withholding on vesting of
restricted stock
Other comprehensive income
Net loss
Balance - December 31, 2019

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 POLARITYTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)

For the Year Ended
December 31, 2019

For the Two Months Ended    

December 31, 2018

For the Year Ended
October 31, 2018

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:

Stock based compensation expense
Change in fair value of derivatives
Depreciation and amortization
Loss on extinguishment of warrant liability
Amortization of intangible assets
Amortization of debt discount
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
Other non-cash adjustments

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable
Inventory
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Operating lease right-of-use assets
Other assets
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Other current liabilities
Deferred revenue
Operating lease liabilities

Net cash used in operating activities

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Purchase of property and equipment
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities
Acquisition of IBEX

Net cash used in continuing investing activities
Net cash provided by discontinued investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Net proceeds from the sale of common stock
Proceeds from stock options exercised
Proceeds from ESPP purchase
Cash paid for tax withholdings related to net share settlement
Payment of contingent consideration liability
Principal payments on financing leases
Principal payments on term note payable and financing
arrangements

Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities:

Property and equipment additions acquired through finance leases
Property and equipment acquired through financing arrangements
Unpaid liability for acquisition of property and equipment
Reclassification of stock-based compensation expense that was
previously classified as a liability to paid-in capital
Conversion of Series A, B, C, D, E preferred stock to common stock  
Unpaid tax liability related to net share settlement of restricted stock
units
Contingent consideration earned and recorded in accounts payable
Exchange of Series F preferred stock for common stock
Extinguishment of warrant liability
Deemed dividend – accretion of discount on Series F preferred stock  
Cumulative dividends on Series F preferred stock
Series F preferred stock dividends paid in common stock
Contingent consideration for IBEX acquisition
Note payable issued as partial consideration for IBEX acquisition

$

(92,493)  

$

(18,418)  

$

31,402 
– 
2,992 
– 
193 
49 
(36)  
914 
20 

(1,019)  
84 
193 
1,651 
(249)  
1,269 
32 
(72)  
(1,578)  
(56,648)  

(2,773)  
(40,072)  
23,327 
3,901 
– 

(15,617)  

– 

(15,617)  

28,073 
529 
99 
(679)  
(225)  
(453)  

(534)  

26,810 

(45,455)  
55,673 
10,218 

2,578 
58 
273 

38 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

$

$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

8,946   
–   
330   
–   
33   
10   
57   
–   
86   

228   
(98)  
(279)  
–   
(535)  
1,621   
–   
20   
–   
(7,999)  

(834)  
(10,200)  
4,003   
–   
–   
(7,031)  
10   
(7,021)  

–   
–   
–   
–   
–   
(11)  

(257)  
(268)  

(15,288)  
70,961   
55,673   

20   
–   
600   

–   
–   

155   
31   
–   
–   
–   
–   
–   
–   
–   

$

$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

$

$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-6

(65,441)

38,821 
(3,814)
1,394 
520 
100 
35 
20 
– 
– 

(940)
(238)
(911)
– 
(378)
2,136 
– 
150 
– 
(28,546)

(9,221)
– 
– 
– 
(2,258)
(11,479)
60 
(11,419)

92,676 
687 
– 
– 
(30)
(74)

– 
93,259 

53,294 
17,667 
70,961 

251 
– 
300 

– 
109,995 

– 
33 
13,061 
2,525 
1,290 
373 
306 
278 
1,220 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1. PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITY

 POLARITYTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PolarityTE, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a biotechnology company developing and commercializing regenerative tissue products and biomaterials.

Change in Fiscal Year end. On January 11, 2019, the Board approved an amendment to the Restated Bylaws of the Company changing the Company’s fiscal year end
from October 31 to December 31. The Company made this change to align its fiscal year end with other companies within its industry. The change in the Company’s fiscal year
end resulted in a two-month transition period that began on November 1, 2018 and ended on December 31, 2018

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of

America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Principles of Consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Significant

intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use  of  estimates. The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  U.S.  GAAP  requires  management  to  make  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect  the
reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  or  the  disclosure  of  gain  or  loss  contingencies  at  the  date  of  the  financial  statements  and  the  reported  amounts  of  revenues  and
expenses during the reporting periods. Among the more significant estimates included in these financial statements is the extent of progress toward completion of contracts,
stock-based compensation, the valuation allowances for deferred tax benefits, and the valuation of tangible and intangible assets included in acquisitions. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.

Segments. The Company’s operations are based in the United States and involve products and services which are managed separately. Accordingly, it operates in two
segments:  1)  regenerative  medicine  products  and  2)  contract  services.  The  Chief  Operating  Decision  Maker  (CODM)  is  the  Office  of  the  Chief  Executive  consisting  of  the
President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Financial Officer. The CODM allocates resources to and assesses the performance of each operating segment using information
about its revenue and operating income (loss). In May 2018, the Company purchased the assets of a preclinical research sciences business and related real estate from Ibex
Group, L.L.C., a Utah limited liability company, and Ibex Preclinical Research, Inc., a Utah corporation (collectively “IBEX”). Prior to the acquisition of IBEX, the Company
operated in one segment.

Cash and cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase.

Investments.  Investments  in  debt  securities  have  been  classified  as  available-for-sale  and  are  carried  at  fair  value,  with  unrealized  gains  and  losses  reported  as  a
component  of  accumulated  other  comprehensive  income.  Realized  gains  and  losses  are  included  in  other  income,  net.  The  cost  of  securities  sold  is  based  on  the  specific-
identification method. Interest on marketable securities is included in interest income, net. Investments with original maturities of greater than three months but less than one
year from the date of purchase are classified as current. Investments with original maturities of greater than one year from the date of purchase are classified as non-current.

F-7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts Receivable. Accounts receivable consists of amounts due to the Company related to the sale of the Company’s core product SkinTE and contract services.
Accounts that are outstanding longer than the contractual payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts by considering a
number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due and the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to the Company. The Company
writes  off  accounts  receivable  when  they  become  uncollectible. As  of  December  31,  2019,  the  Company  recorded  an  allowance  of  $26,000. As  of  December  31,  2018  and
October 31, 2018, an allowance for doubtful accounts was not considered necessary.

Inventory. Inventory comprises raw materials, which are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value, on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company evaluates the

carrying value of its inventory on a regular basis, taking into account anticipated future sales compared with quantities on hand, and the remaining shelf life of goods on hand.

Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis
over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally ranging from three to eight years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the
shorter of the assets’ estimated useful lives or the remaining term of the lease. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Upon sale or retirement of assets,
the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the balance sheet and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.

Leases. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Right-of-use (“ROU”) assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for
the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Finance leases are reported in the consolidated balance
sheet in property and equipment and other current and long-term liabilities. The short-term portion of operating lease obligations are included in other current liabilities. The
classification of the Company’s leases as operating or finance leases along with the initial measurement and recognition of the associated ROU assets and lease liabilities is
performed at the lease commencement date. The measurement of lease liabilities is based on the present value of future lease payments over the lease term. As the Company’s
leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date in determining the
present  value  of  future  lease  payments.  The  ROU  asset  is  based  on  the  measurement  of  the  lease  liability  and  also  includes  any  lease  payments  made  prior  to  or  on  lease
commencement and excludes lease incentives and initial direct costs incurred, as applicable. The lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is
reasonably certain the Company will exercise any such options. Rent expense for the Company’s operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Amortization expense for the ROU asset associated with its finance leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease and interest expense associated with its
finance leases is recognized on the balance of the lease liability using the effective interest method based on the estimated incremental borrowing rate.

The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components. As allowed under ASC 842, the Company has elected not to separate lease and non-lease
components  for  any  leases  involving  real  estate  and  office  equipment  classes  of  assets  and,  as  a  result,  accounts  for  the  lease  and  non-lease  components  as  a  single  lease
component. The Company has also elected not to apply the recognition requirement of ASC 842 to leases with a term of 12 months or less for all classes of assets.

Goodwill  and  Intangible  Assets. Goodwill  represents  the  excess  purchase  price  over  the  fair  value  of  net  tangible  and  intangible  assets  acquired.  Goodwill  is  not

amortized, rather the carrying amount of goodwill is assessed for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators exist.

Goodwill is tested for impairment at a reporting unit level by performing either a qualitative or quantitative analysis. The qualitative analysis is an assessment of factors
to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the Company concludes that it is not more likely than not
that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then no further testing is necessary.

F-8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
If  the  Company  concludes  otherwise,  a  quantitative  analysis  is  performed  by  comparing  the  fair  value  of  a  reporting  unit  to  its  carrying  amount.  If  the  fair  value
exceeds the carrying value, there is no impairment. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the fair value
and the carrying value. During the year, the Company performed a qualitative assessment and concluded that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is
more than its carrying value. Accordingly, there was no indication of impairment, and further quantitative analysis was not required.

Intangible assets deemed to have finite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from one to eleven years.
The useful life is the period over which the asset is expected to contribute directly, or indirectly, to its future cash flows. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment when
certain  events  or  circumstances  exist.  For  amortizable  intangible  assets,  impairment  exists  when  the  undiscounted  cash  flows  exceed  its  carrying  value  and  an  impairment
charge would be recorded for the excess of the carrying value over its fair value. At least annually, the remaining useful life is evaluated.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. The Company reviews long-lived assets, including property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in business
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Factors that the Company considers in deciding when to perform an impairment
review include significant underperformance of the business in relation to expectations, significant negative industry or economic trends, and significant changes or planned
changes in the use of the assets. If an impairment review is performed to evaluate a long-lived asset for recoverability, the Company compares forecasts of undiscounted cash
flows  expected  to  result  from  the  use  and  eventual  disposition  of  the  long-lived  asset  to  its  carrying  value.  An  impairment  loss  would  be  recognized  when  estimated
undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of an asset are less than its carrying amount. The impairment loss would be based on the excess of the carrying
value of the impaired asset over its fair value, determined based on discounted cash flows. There were no impairments of long-lived assets for any of the periods presented.

Capitalized Software. The Company capitalizes certain internal and external costs incurred to acquire or create internal use software. Costs to create internal software
are capitalized during the application development period. Capitalized software is included in property and equipment and is depreciated over three years once development is
complete.

Revenue Recognition. Revenue was recognized under ASC 605 for the year ended October 31, 2018. Under ASC 605, regenerative medicine revenue is recognized
upon the shipment of products or the performance of services when each of the following four criteria is met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) products are
delivered  or  services  are  performed;  (iii)  the  sales  price  is  fixed  or  determinable;  and  (iv)  collectability  is  reasonably  assured.  In  the  contract  services  segment,  revenue  is
recognized on the proportional performance method over the term of the service contract, which requires the Company to make reasonable estimates of the extent of progress
toward completion of the contract. Under this method, revenue is recognized according to the percentage of cost completed for the contract. As a result, unbilled receivables and
deferred revenue are recognized based on payment timing and work completed.

The Company adopted ASC 606 for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the two months ended December 31, 2018. Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized when a
customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.
To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that an entity determines are within the scope of ASC 606, the Company performs the following five steps: (i) identify the
contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance
obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

In the regenerative medicine products segment, the Company records product revenues primarily from the sale of its regenerative tissue products. The Company sells
its products to healthcare providers, primarily through direct sales representatives. Product revenues consists of a single performance obligation that the Company satisfies at a
point in time. In general, the Company recognizes product revenue upon delivery to the customer.

F-9

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In the contract services segment, the Company records service revenues from the sale of its contract research services, which includes delivery of preclinical studies
and other research services to unrelated third parties. Service revenues generally consist of a single performance obligation that the Company satisfies over time using an input
method based on costs incurred to date relative to the total costs expected to be required to satisfy the performance obligation. The Company believes that this method provides
a faithful depiction of the transfer of services over the term of the performance obligation based on the remaining services needed to satisfy the obligation. This requires the
Company to make reasonable estimates of the extent of progress toward completion of the contract. As a result, unbilled receivables and deferred revenue are recognized based
on payment timing and work completed. Generally, a portion of the payment is due upfront and the remainder upon completion of the contract, with most contracts completing
in less than a year. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had unbilled receivables of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and deferred revenue of $0.1
million and $0.2 million, respectively. The unbilled receivables balance is included in consolidated accounts receivable. Revenue of $0.2 million was recognized during the year
ended December 31, 2019 that was included in the deferred revenue balance as of December 31, 2018. The impact of the new revenue standard did not have a material impact
to the financial statements.

Costs to obtain the contract are incurred for product revenue as they are shipped and are expensed as incurred.

The  Company  considers  a  significant  customer  to  be  one  that  comprises  more  than  10%  of  net  revenues  or  accounts  receivable.  Concentration  of  revenues  was  as

follows:

Customer A
Customer B
Customer C

Segment
Contract Services
Regenerative Medicine
Contract Services

For the Year Ended
December 31, 2019
% of Revenue

For the Two Months Ended
December 31, 2018
% of Revenue

For the Year Ended
October 31, 2018
% of Revenue

23% 
* 
* 

32% 
17% 
11% 

Concentration of accounts receivable was as follows:

Customer A
Customer B
Customer D
Customer E
Customer F
Customer G

*The amount did not exceed 10%

Segment
Contract services
Regenerative medicine
Regenerative medicine
Regenerative medicine
Contract services
Regenerative medicine

December 31, 2019
% of Accounts
Receivable

December 31, 2018
% of Accounts
Receivable

* 
* 
* 
11% 
15% 
14% 

19%
* 
* 

23%
20%
14%
* 
* 
* 

Research and Development Expenses. Costs incurred for research and development are expensed as incurred. Nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services
that have the characteristics that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities pursuant to executory contractual arrangements with third party research
organizations are deferred and recognized as an expense as the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed.

Accruals for Research and Development Expenses and Clinical Trials. As part of the process of preparing its financial statements, the Company is required to estimate
its expenses resulting from its obligations under contracts with vendors, clinical research organizations and consultants and under clinical site agreements in connection with
conducting clinical trials. The financial terms of these contracts are subject to negotiations, which vary from contract to contract and may result in payment terms that do not
match the periods over which materials or services are provided under such contracts. The Company’s objective is to reflect the appropriate expenses in its financial statements
by matching those expenses with the period in which services are performed and efforts are expended. The Company accounts for these expenses according to the timing of
various aspects of the expenses. The Company determines accrual estimates by taking into account discussion with applicable personnel and outside service providers as to the
progress of clinical trials, or the services completed. During the course of a clinical trial, the Company adjusts its clinical expense recognition if actual results differ from its
estimates. The Company makes estimates of its accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date based on the facts and circumstances known to it at that time. The Company’s
clinical trial accruals are dependent upon the timely and accurate reporting of contract research organizations and other third-party vendors. Although the Company does not
expect its estimates to be materially different from amounts actually incurred, its understanding of the status and timing of services performed relative to the actual status and
timing of services performed may vary and may result in it reporting amounts that are too high or too low for any particular period.

F-10

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock-Based  Compensation.  The  Company  measures  all  stock-based  compensation  to  employees  and  non-employees  using  a  fair  value  method  and  records  such
expense  in  general  and  administrative,  research  and  development,  and  sales  and  marketing  expenses.  For  stock  options  with  graded  vesting,  the  Company  recognizes
compensation expense over the service period for each separately vesting tranche of the award as though the award were in substance, multiple awards based on the fair value on
the date of grant.

The fair value for options issued is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury yield

curve in effect at the time of the grant. The volatility factor is determined based on the Company’s historical stock prices. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur.

The fair value of restricted stock grants is measured based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and amortized over the vesting

period of, generally, six months to three years.

Stock-based compensation expense for nonemployee services had historically been subject to remeasurement at each reporting date as the underlying equity instruments
vest  and  was  recognized  as  an  expense  over  the  period  during  which  services  are  received.  Upon  the  adoption  of ASU  2018-07,  Compensation  –  Stock  Compensation  on
January 1, 2019, the valuation was fixed at the implementation date and will be recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining service period.

Income Taxes.  The  Company  accounts  for  income  taxes  under  the  asset  and  liability  method.  Deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  are  recognized  for  the  future  tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and
tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in  the  years  in  which  those  temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. The Company evaluates the potential for realization of deferred tax assets at each balance sheet date and records a valuation allowance for assets for which
realization is not more likely than not. The Company recognizes interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense.

Loss Per Share. Basic loss per share of common stock is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares
of common stock outstanding for the period. Since the Company was in a loss position for all periods presented, basic net loss per share is the same as diluted net loss per share
since the effects of potentially dilutive securities are antidilutive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August  2018,  the  FASB  issued ASU  2018-13, Fair  Value  Measurement  (Topic  820),  Disclosure  Framework-Changes  to  the  Disclosure  Requirements  for  Fair
Value Measurement. The ASU modifies the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements by removing, modifying or adding certain disclosures. The standard is effective
for  fiscal  years  beginning  after  December  15,  2019,  including  interim  periods  within  those  fiscal  years  with  early  adoption  permitted.  The  Company  does  not  expect  the
adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), which requires entities to measure all expected credit losses for
financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This replaces the existing incurred loss
model and is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-10,  Financial Instruments—
Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates , which defers the effective date of Topic 326. As a smaller reporting
company,  Topic  326  will  now  be  effective  for  the  Company  beginning  January  1,  2023. As  such,  the  Company  plans  to  adopt  this ASU  beginning  January  1,  2023.  The
Company is currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

F-11

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

On January 1, 2019 the Company adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases (ASC 842) and related amendments, which require lease assets and liabilities to be recorded on the
balance sheet for leases with terms greater than twelve months. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating
leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized
based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. The standard was adopted using the modified retrospective transition
approach by applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of the initial application and not restating comparative periods.

The Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, which allowed it to carryforward its historical lease classification, its
assessment on whether a contract was or contains a lease, and its initial direct costs for any leases that existed prior to January 1, 2019. The impact of the adoption of ASC 842
on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2019 was as follows (in thousands):

Operating lease right-of-use assets
Liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Other current liabilities
Operating lease liabilities

$

$

$

$

–   

6,508   
316   
–   

$

$

5,305   

(75)  
1,432   
3,948   

5,305 

6,433 
1,748 
3,948 

December 31, 2018

Adjustments Due to the
Adoption of ASC 842

January 1, 2019

The adjustments due to the adoption of ASC 842 related to the recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities for the existing operating

leases. A cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning accumulated deficit was not required.

In  June  2018,  the  FASB  issued ASU  2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements  to  Nonemployee  Share-based  Payment  Accounting.
The  standard  expands  the  scope  of  Topic  718  to  include  share-based  payments  issued  to  nonemployees  for  goods  or  services,  simplifying  the  accounting  for  share-based
payments  to  nonemployees  by  aligning  it  with  the  accounting  for  share-based  payments  to  employees,  with  certain  exceptions.  The  standard  is  effective  for  fiscal  years
beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company
adopted this ASU on January 1, 2019. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment. ASU No.
2017-04 removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a
reporting  unit’s  carrying  value  exceeds  its  fair  value,  not  to  exceed  the  carrying  amount  of  goodwill.  The  Company  early  adopted  this  standard  on  November  1,  2018.  The
adoption of this ASU had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

3. LIQUIDITY

The Company has experienced recurring losses and cash outflows from operating activities. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has an accumulated deficit of

$435.4 million. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $29.2 million.

On April 10, 2019, the Company completed an underwritten offering providing for the issuance and sale of 3,418,918 shares of the Company’s common stock, par

value $0.001 per share, at an offering price of $8.51 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $27.9 million, after deducting offering expenses payable by the Company.

On December 5, 2019, the Company entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), with Keystone Capital Partners, LLC (“Keystone”),
pursuant to which Keystone has agreed to purchase from the Company up to $25.0 million of shares of its common stock, subject to certain limitations including a minimum
stock  price  of  $2.00,  at  the  direction  of  the  Company  from  time  to  time  during  the  36-month  term  of  the  Purchase Agreement.  Concurrently,  the  Company  entered  into  a
Registration Rights Agreement with Keystone, pursuant to which it agreed to register the sales of its common stock pursuant to the Purchase Agreement under the Company’s
existing shelf registration statement on Form S-3 or a new registration statement. On December 19, 2019, the Company sold 54,090 shares under the Purchase Agreement at a
purchase price of $2.31 per share, for total proceeds of $0.1 million.

F-12

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On February 14, 2020, the Company completed an underwritten offering of 10,638,298 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase 10,638,298 shares of
common stock. Each common share and warrant were sold together for a combined purchase price of $2.35. The exercise price of each warrant is $2.80 per share, the warrants
were exercisable immediately, and they will expire February 12, 2027. The net proceeds to the Company from the offering are estimated to be approximately $22.7 million,
after estimated offering expenses payable by the Company.

Following the end of 2019, the Company effectuated four additional sales of common stock to Keystone under the Purchase Agreement for a total of 216,412 shares
generating total gross proceeds of $0.6 million. In connection with the underwritten offering described in the preceding paragraph, the Company agreed not to sell any additional
shares under the Purchase Agreement for a period of 90 days after the closing date of the offering.

Based upon the current status of product development and commercialization plans, the Company believes that its existing cash and cash equivalents, with planned
operating cost reductions, will be adequate to satisfy its capital and operating needs for at least the next 12 months from the date of filing. The Company believes it may need
additional financing to continue clinical deployment and commercialization of SkinTE and development of its other product candidates. The Company will continue to pursue
fundraising opportunities when available, but such financing may not be available in the future on favorable terms, if at all. If adequate financing is not available, the Company
may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate  one  or  more  of  its  product  development  programs,  or  be  unable  to  continue  operations  over  a  longer  term.  The
Company  plans  to  meet  its  capital  requirements  primarily  through  issuances  of  equity  securities,  debt  financing,  revenue  from  product  sales  or  strategic  partnership
arrangements. Failure to generate revenue or raise additional capital would adversely affect the Company’s ability to achieve its intended business objectives.

4. IBEX ACQUISITION

On March 2, 2018, the Company, along with its wholly owned subsidiary, Utah CRO Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation, entered into agreements with IBEX for the
purchase of the assets and rights to the Seller’s preclinical research and contract services business and related real estate. The Company acquired this preclinical biomedical
research  facility  in  order  to  accelerate  research  and  development  of  PolarityTE  pipeline  products.  The  business  consists  of  a  GLP  compliant  preclinical  research  facility,
including vivarium, operating rooms, preparation rooms, storage facilities, and surgical and imaging equipment. The real property includes two parcels in Cache County, Utah,
consisting of approximately 1.75 combined gross acres of land, together with the buildings, structures, fixtures, and personal property located on the real property. The above
was accounted for as a business combination.

The  acquisition  closed  on  May  3,  2018.  The  aggregate  purchase  price  was  $3.8  million,  of  which  $2.3  million  was  paid  at  closing  and  the  balance  satisfied  by  a
promissory  note  payable  to  the  Seller  with  an  initial  fair  value  of  $1.2  million  (see  Note  11)  and  contingent  consideration  with  an  initial  fair  value  of  approximately  $0.3
million. During the year ended October 31, 2018, the Company recorded approximately $38,000 of direct and incremental costs associated with acquisition-related activities.
These costs were incurred primarily for banking, legal, and professional fees associated with the IBEX acquisition. These costs were recorded in general and administrative
expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.

During the year ended October 31, 2018, IBEX contributed approximately $0.9 million to net revenues and approximately $0.3 million to gross profit, respectively.

Purchase Price Allocation

The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation for the IBEX acquisition (in thousands):

Equipment
Land and buildings
Intangible assets
Goodwill
Accrued property taxes

Aggregate purchase price
Less: Promissory note to seller
Contingent consideration

Cash paid at closing

F-13

  $

  $

  $

430 
2,000 
1,057 
278 
(9)
3,756 
1,220 
278 
2,258 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As part of the acquisition of IBEX, the Company recorded a contingent consideration liability of $0.3 million in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.
The contingent consideration represents the estimated fair value of future payments due to the Seller of IBEX based on IBEX’s revenue generated from studies quoted prior to
but completed after the transaction. Contingent consideration is initially recognized at fair value as purchase consideration and subsequently remeasured at fair value through
earnings.  The  initial  fair  value  of  the  contingent  consideration  was  based  on  the  present  value  of  estimated  future  cash  flows  using  a  20%  discount  rate.  The  contingent
consideration is the payment of 15% of the actual revenues received for work on any study initiated within 18 months following the closing of the purchase on the basis of
certain  specific  customer  prospects  that  received  service  proposals  prior  to  the  closing,  provided  that  the  total  payments  will  not  exceed  $650,000.  During  the  year  ended
December 31, 2019, the Company recognized a decrease in the fair value of contingent consideration of $36,000. During the two months ended December 31, 2018 and the year
ended October 31, 2018, the Company recognized an increase in fair value of the contingent consideration of $20,000 and $57,000, respectively. The change in fair value was
recognized in general and administrative expense in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair
values of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired is recorded as goodwill, including the value of the assembled workforce.

Disclosure of pro-forma revenues and earnings attributable to the acquisition is excluded because it is impracticable to obtain complete historical financial records for

IBEX Preclinical Research, Inc.

The following table shows the valuation of the individual identifiable intangible assets acquired along with their estimated remaining useful lives as of the acquisition

date (in thousands):

Non-compete agreement
Customer contracts and relationships
Trade names and trademarks
Backlog

Total intangible assets

5. FAIR VALUE

Approximate
Fair Value

410   
534   
101   
12   
1,057   

  $

  $

Remaining
Useful Life
(in years)
4
7 to 8
10 to 11
Less than 1

In  accordance  with ASC  820,  Fair  Value  Measurements  and  Disclosures,  financial  instruments  were  measured  at  fair  value  using  a  three-level  hierarchy  which

maximizes use of observable inputs and minimizes use of unobservable inputs:

●

●

●

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. This methodology applies to the Company’s Level 1 investments,
which are composed of money market funds.

Level 2:  Quoted  prices  for  similar  instruments  that  are  directly  or  indirectly  observable  in  the  market.  This  methodology  applies to  the  Company’s  Level  2
investments, which are composed of corporate debt securities, commercial paper, and U.S. government debt securities.

Level 3:  Significant  unobservable  inputs  supported  by  little  or  no  market  activity.  Financial  instruments  whose  values  are  determined using  pricing  models,
discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, for which determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. This methodology
applies to the Company’s Level 3 financial instruments, which are composed of contingent consideration.

Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. There

were no transfers within the hierarchy for any of the periods presented.

F-14

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In  connection  with  the  offering  of  Units  in  September  2017  (see  Note  12),  the  Company  issued  warrants  to  purchase  an  aggregate  of  322,727  shares  of  common
stock. These warrants were exercisable at $30.00 per share and expired in two years from the date of issuance. The warrants were liabilities pursuant to ASC 815. The warrant
agreement provided for an adjustment to the number of common shares issuable under the warrant or adjustment to the exercise price, including but not limited to, if: (a) the
Company issues shares of common stock as a dividend or distribution to holders of its common stock; (b) the Company subdivides or combines its common stock (i.e., stock
split); or (c) the Company issues new securities for consideration less than the exercise price. Under ASC 815, warrants that provide for down-round exercise price protection
are recognized as derivative liabilities.

The Series F Preferred Shares contained an embedded conversion feature that was not clearly and closely related to the identified host instrument and, as such, was

recognized as a derivative liability measured at fair value. The Company classified these derivatives on the consolidated balance sheet as a current liability.

As discussed in Note 12, both the warrants and the Series F Preferred Shares were exchanged for common stock on March 6, 2018.

The fair value of the bifurcated embedded conversion feature was estimated to be approximately $7.2 million at March 5, 2018 as calculated using the Monte Carlo

simulation with the following assumptions:

Stock price
Exercise price
Risk-free rate
Volatility
Term

Series F
Conversion
Feature
March 5, 2018

  $
  $

20.05 
27.50 

2.2%
88.2%
1.5 

The  fair  value  of  the  warrant  liability  was  estimated  to  be  approximately  $2.5  million  at  March  5,  2018  as  calculated  using  the  Monte  Carlo  simulation  with  the

following assumptions:

Stock price
Exercise price
Risk-free rate
Volatility
Term

Warrant
Liability
March 5, 2018

  $
  $

20.05 
30.00 

2.2%
88.2%
1.5 

The following table sets forth the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as of

December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

Assets

Money market funds
Commercial paper
Corporate debt securities
U.S. government debt securities

Total

Liabilities

Contingent consideration

Total

Fair Value Measurement as of December 31, 2019

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

$

$

$
$

$

$

$
$

2,019 
– 
– 
– 
2,019 

– 
– 

F-15

–   
11,064   
8,982   
3,770   
23,816   

–   
–   

$

$

$
$

–   
–   
–   
–   
–   

31   
31   

$

$

$
$

2,019 
11,064 
8,982 
3,770 
25,835 

31 
31 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Assets

Money market funds
Commercial paper
Corporate debt securities
U.S. government debt securities

Total
Liabilities

Contingent consideration

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Fair Value Measurement as of December 31, 2018

$

$

$
$

7   
–   
–   
–   
7   

–   
–   

$

$

$
$

–   
21,392   
5,448   
3,226   
30,066   

–   
–   

$

$

$
$

–   
–   
–   
–   
–   

261   
261   

$

$

$
$

7 
21,392 
5,448 
3,226 
30,073 

261 
261 

The  following  table  sets  forth  the  changes  in  the  estimated  fair  value  of  the  contingent  consideration  liability  (in  thousands)  which  is  included  in  other  current

liabilities:

Fair value - October 31, 2018
Change in fair value
Earned and moved to accounts payable
Fair value – December 31, 2018
Change in fair value
Earned and paid
Fair value – December 31, 2019

Contingent
Consideration

235 
57 
(31)
261 
(36)
(194)
31 

  $

  $

6. Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments

Cash equivalents and short-term investments consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):

Cash equivalents

Money market funds
Commercial paper
U.S. government debt securities

Total cash equivalents (1)
Short-term investments
Commercial paper
Corporate debt securities
Total short-term investments
Total

Amortized
Cost

Unrealized
Gains

Unrealized
Losses

Market
Value

December 31, 2019

$

$

2,019   
1,020   
3,761   
6,800   

9,986   
8,977   
18,963   
25,763   

$

$

–   
4   
9   
13   

54   
5   
59   
72   

$

$

–   
–   
–   
–   

–   
–   
–   
–   

$

$

2,019 
1,024 
3,770 
6,813 

10,040 
8,982 
19,022 
25,835 

(1)

Included in cash and cash equivalents in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 in addition to $3.4 million of cash.

F-16

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
   
 
 
    
    
    
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
   
 
 
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents

Money market funds
Commercial paper
U.S. government debt securities

Total cash equivalents (1)
Short-term investments
Commercial paper
Corporate debt securities
Total short-term investments
Total

Amortized
Cost

Unrealized
Gains

Unrealized
Losses

Market
Value

December 31, 2018

$

$

7   
20,648   
3,224   
23,879   

714   
5,444   
6,158   
30,037   

$

$

–   
30   
2   
32   

–   
5   
5   
37   

$

$

–   
–   
–   
–   

–   
(1)  
(1)  
(1)  

$

$

7 
20,678 
3,226 
23,911 

714 
5,448 
6,162 
30,073 

(1)

Included in cash and cash equivalents in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 in addition to $31.8 million of cash.

All  investments  of  debt  securities  held  as  of  December  31,  2019  and  2018  had  maturities  of  less  than  one  year.  During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2019,  the
Company recognized $0.5 million net realized gains on available-for-sale securities. For the two months ended December 31, 2018, realized gains or losses on available-for-sale
securities were immaterial.

The interest earned from available-for-sale securities was $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and is included in interest income, net in the consolidated

statements of operations. For the two months ended December 31, 2018, interest earned from available-for-sale securities was immaterial.

7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

The following table presents the components of property and equipment, net (in thousands):

Machinery and equipment
Land and buildings
Computers and software
Leasehold improvements
Construction in progress
Furniture and equipment

Total property and equipment, gross

Accumulated depreciation

Total property and equipment, net

December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

12,083    $
2,000   
1,189   
2,282   
1,606   
470   
19,630   
(4,719)  
14,911    $

8,276 
2,000 
1,372 
1,230 
2,402 
614 
15,894 
(2,158)
13,736 

  $

  $

Depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment, including assets acquired under financing leases was as follows (in thousands):

General and administrative expense
Research and development expense

Total depreciation and amortization expense

$

$

1,562   
1,430   
2,992   

$

$

155   
175   
330   

$
$
$

223 
1,171 
1,394 

For the Year Ended
December 31,
2019

For the Two Months
ended December 31,
2018

For the Year Ended
October 31,
2018

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized a loss on disposal of property and equipment of $0.9 million.

F-17

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
   
 
 
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8. LEASES

The Company leases facilities and certain equipment under noncancelable leases that expire at various dates through November 2024. These leases require monthly
lease payments that may be subject to annual increases throughout the lease term. Certain of these leases may include options to extend or terminate the lease at the election of
the Company. These optional periods have not been considered in the determination of the right-of-use-assets or lease liabilities associated with these leases as the Company did
not consider it reasonably certain it would exercise the options.

In April 2019, the Company entered into an operating lease to obtain 6,307 square feet of manufacturing, laboratory, and office space. The lease expires April 2024
and requires monthly lease payments subject to annual increases. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company also increased office space under an existing lease,
which requires additional monthly lease payments.

As of December 31 2019, the maturities of operating and finance lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

Operating leases

Finance leases

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter

Total lease payments

Less:

Imputed interest

Total

Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows (in thousands):

Finance leases

Finance lease right-of-use assets included within property and equipment, net

Current finance lease liabilities included within other current liabilities
Non-current finance lease liabilities included within other long-term liabilities

Total

Operating leases

Current operating lease liabilities included within other current liabilities
Operating lease liabilities – non current

Total

The components of lease expense was as follows (in thousands):

Operating lease costs included within operating costs and expenses
 Finance lease costs:

Amortization of right of use assets
Interest on lease liabilities

Total

F-18

$

$

  $

  $

  $

  $

  $

$

2,114   
1,730   
1,345   
132   
87   
–   
5,408   

(668)  
4,740   

$

December 31, 2019

December 31 2019

2,177 

508 
1,267 
1,775 

1,746 
2,994 
4,740 

For the Year Ended
December 31, 2019

$

$

$

659 
656 
405 
336 
42 
1 
2,099 

(324)
1,775 

2,173 

654 
152 
806 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows (in thousands):

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:

Operating cash out flows from operating leases
Operating cash out flows from finance leases
Financing cash out flows from finance leases

Lease liabilities arising from obtaining right-of-use assets:

Finance leases
Lease payments made in prior period reclassified to property and equipment
Operating leases

For the Year Ended
December 31, 2019

$

$

2,100 
152 
453 

2,043 
535 
936 

As of December 31, 2019, the weighted average remaining operating lease term is 2.8 years and the weighted average discount rate used to determine the operating
lease liability was 9.83%. The weighted average remaining finance lease term is 3.5 years and the weighted average discount rate used to determine the finance lease liability
was 9.77%.

The following disclosures as of December 31, 2018 continue to be in accordance with ASC 840. Future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases at

December 31, 2018 was as follows (in thousands):

2019
2020
2021
2022

Operating
leases

Capital leases

  $

  $

1,895    $
1,819   
1,455   
1,216   
6,385    $

66 
58 
55 
28 
207 

Rent expense under ASC 840 for the two months ended December 31, 2018 and the year ended October 31, 2018 was $0.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively.

9. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

Intangible assets, net, consist of the following (in thousands):

Non-compete agreement
Customer contracts and relationships
Trade names and trademarks
Backlog

Total intangible assets, gross

Accumulated amortization

Total intangible assets, net

December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

$

$

410   
534   
101   
12   
1,057   
(326)  
731   

$

$

410 
534 
101 
12 
1,057 
(133)
924 

Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2019, the two months ended December 31, 2018 and the year ended October 31, 2018 was approximately $0.2

million, $33,000 and $0.1 million, respectively.

The future amortization of intangible assets is expected to be as follows (in thousands):

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter

  $

  $

189 
189 
121 
87 
87 
58 
731 

As a result of the IBEX acquisition in May 2018, the Company recognized $0.3 million of goodwill in the contract services segment. There were no changes in the

carrying amount of goodwill for any of the periods presented.

F-19

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

The following table presents the major components of accounts payable and accrued expenses (in thousands):

Accounts payable
Salaries and other compensation
Legal and accounting
Accrued severance
Benefit plan accrual
Other

Total accounts payable and accrued expenses

December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

1,689    $
1,462     
1,404     
1,053     
557     
930     
7,095    $

2,918 
1,041 
640 
– 
239 
1,670 
6,508 

  $

  $

Salaries and other compensation include accrued payroll expense, accrued bonus, and estimated employer 401(k) plan contributions.

Accrued severance includes $0.9 million of accrued compensation owed to Dr. Denver Lough, a former officer and director, under a settlement terms agreement dated

August 21, 2019 (Note 18). The remaining amount due of $0.3 million is included in other long-term liabilities.

11. LONG TERM NOTE PAYABLE

In connection with the IBEX Acquisition, described in Note 4, the Company issued a promissory note payable to the Seller with an initial fair value of $1.2 million.
The promissory note has a principal balance of $1.3 million and bears interest at a rate of 3.5% interest per annum. Principal and interest are payable in five equal installments
that began on November 3, 2018 and continuing on each six-month anniversary thereafter (“Payment Date”). The promissory note may be prepaid by the Company at any time
and becomes due and payable at the earlier of the maturity date of November 3, 2020 or upon an event of default, which includes failure to pay any installment on each Payment
Date, breach of any negative covenants, insolvency or bankruptcy. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the promissory note will bear an accelerated interest rate of 7%
per annum from the date of the event of default. As of December 31, 2019 the note payable balance was $0.5 million.

The  Company  initially  recognized  the  promissory  note  at  its  fair  value,  using  an  estimated  market  rate  of  interest  for  the  Company,  which  was  higher  than  the
promissory note’s stated rate. The result of imputing a market rate of interest resulted in an initial discount to the principal balance of approximately $0.1 million, which is being
amortized to interest expense over the term of the promissory note using the effective interest method. The unamortized debt discount was $19,000 and $68,000 at December
31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Amortization of debt discount of $49,000, $10,000 and $35,000 was included in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2019, the
two months ended December 31, 2018 and the year ended October 31, 2018, respectively.

12. PREFERRED SHARES AND COMMON SHARES

Common Stock Issuance

On April 10, 2019, the Company completed an underwritten offering providing for the issuance and sale of 3,418,918 shares of the Company’s common stock, par

value $0.001 per share, at an offering price of $8.51 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $27.9 million, after deducting offering expenses payable by the Company.

On December 5, 2019, the Company entered into the Purchase Agreement with Keystone pursuant to which Keystone has agreed to purchase from the Company up to
$25.0 million of shares of its common stock, subject to certain limitations including a minimum stock price of $2.00, at the direction of the Company from time to time during
the 36-month term of the Purchase Agreement. Concurrently, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with Keystone, pursuant to which it agreed to register
the sales of its common stock pursuant to the Purchase Agreement under the Company’s existing shelf registration statement on Form S-3 or a new registration statement. On
December 19, 2019, the Company sold 54,090 shares under the Purchase Agreement at a purchase price of $2.31 per share, for total proceeds of $0.1 million.

On April 12, 2018, the Company completed a public offering of 2,335,937 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at an offering price of

$16.00 per share resulting in net proceeds of approximately $34.6 million, after deducting offering expenses payable by the Company.

On June 7, 2018, the Company completed an underwritten offering of 2,455,882 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at an offering

price of $23.65 per share resulting in net proceeds of approximately $58.0 million, after deducting offering expenses payable by the Company.

F-20

 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exchange of 100% of Outstanding Series F Preferred Stock Shares and Warrants

On September 20, 2017, the Company sold an aggregate of $17,750,000 worth of units of the Company’s securities (the “Units”) to accredited investors at a purchase
price of $2,750 per Unit. Each Unit consisted of (i) one share of the Company’s newly authorized 6% Series F Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the
“Series F Preferred Shares”), convertible into one hundred (100) shares of the Company’s common stock, and (ii) a two-year warrant to purchase up to 322,727 shares of the
Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of $30.00 per share.

The Series F Preferred Shares were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock based on a conversion calculation equal to the stated value of the Series F
Preferred Shares, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, on such Series F Preferred Shares, as of such date of determination, divided by the conversion price. The stated
value  of  each  Series  F  Preferred  Share  was  $2,750  and  the  initial  conversion  price  was  $27.50  per  share,  each  subject  to  adjustment  for  stock  splits,  stock  dividends,
recapitalizations, combinations, subdivisions or other similar events.

The warrants issued in connection with the Series F Preferred Shares were determined to be liabilities pursuant to ASC 815. The warrant agreement provided for an
adjustment to the number of common shares issuable under the warrant or adjustment to the exercise price, including but not limited to, if: (a) the Company issued shares of
common stock as a dividend or distribution to holders of its common stock; (b) the Company subdivided or combined its common stock (i.e., stock split); or (c) the Company
issues new securities for consideration less than the exercise price. Under ASC 815, warrants that provide for down-round exercise price protection are recognized as derivative
liabilities.

The conversion feature within the Series F Preferred Shares was determined to not be clearly and closely related to the identified host instrument and, as such, was

recognized as a derivative liability measured at fair value pursuant to ASC 815.

The  initial  fair  value  of  the  warrants  and  bifurcated  embedded  conversion  feature,  estimated  to  be  approximately  $4.3  million  and  $9.3  million,  respectively,  was
deducted from the gross proceeds of the Unit offering to arrive at the initial discounted carrying value of the Series F Preferred Shares. The resulting discount to the aggregate
stated value of the Series F Preferred Shares of approximately $13.6 million was recognized as accretion using the effective interest method similar to preferred stock dividends,
over the two-year period prior to optional redemption by the holders.

On  March  6,  2018,  the  Company  entered  into  separate  exchange  agreements  (the  “Exchange Agreements”)  with  holders  (each  a  “Holder”,  and  collectively  the
“Holders”)  of  100%  of  the  Company’s  outstanding  Series  F  Preferred  Shares,  and  the  Company’s  warrants  to  purchase  shares  of  the  Company’s  common  stock  issued  in
connection with the Series F Preferred Shares (such “Warrants” and Series F Preferred Shares collectively referred to as the “Exchange Securities”) to exchange the Exchange
Securities and unpaid dividends on the Series F Preferred Shares for common stock (the “Exchange”).

The Exchange resulted in the following issuances: (A) all outstanding Series F Preferred Shares were converted into 972,070 shares of restricted common stock at an
effective conversion price of $18.26 per share of common stock (the closing price of Common Stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on February 26, 2018); (B) the right to
receive  6%  dividends  underlying  Series  F  Preferred  Shares  was  terminated  in  exchange  for  31,321  shares  of  restricted  common  stock;  (C)  322,727  Warrants  to  purchase
common  stock  were  exchanged  for  151,871  shares  of  restricted  common  stock;  and  (D)  the  Holders  of  the  Warrants  relinquished  any  and  all  other  rights  pursuant  to  the
Warrants, including exercise price adjustments.

As part of the Exchange, the Holders also relinquished all other rights related to the issuance of the Exchange Securities, the respective governing agreements and
certificates of designation, including any related dividends, adjustment of conversion and exercise price, and repayment option. The existing registration rights agreement with
the holders of the Series F Preferred Shares was also terminated and the holders of the Series F Preferred Shares waived the obligation of the Company to register the common
shares issuable upon conversion of Series F Preferred Shares or upon exercise of the warrants, and waived any damages, penalties and defaults related to the Company failing to
file or have declared effective a registration statement covering those shares.

F-21

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  exchange  of  all  outstanding  Series  F  Preferred  Shares,  and  the  holders’  right  to  receive  6%  dividends,  for  common  stock  of  the  Company  was  recognized  as

follows:

Fair market value of 1,003,393 shares of common stock issued at $20.05 (Company’s closing stock price on March 5, 2018) in exchange for
Series F Preferred Shares and accrued dividends
Carrying value of Series F Preferred Shares at March 5, 2018, including dividends
Carrying value of bifurcated conversion option at March 5, 2018
Deemed dividend on Series F Preferred Shares exchange

$

$

20,117,990 
(5,898,274)
(7,162,587)
7,057,129 

As the Warrants were classified as a liability, the exchange of the Warrants for common shares was recognized as a liability extinguishment. As of March 5, 2018, the
fair market value of the 151,871 common shares issued in the Exchange was $3,045,034 and the fair value of the common stock warrant liability was $2,525,567 resulting in a
loss on extinguishment of warrant liability of $519,467 during the year ended October 31, 2018.

The Company recognized accretion of the discount to the stated value of the Series F Preferred Shares of approximately $1,290,000 during the year ended October 31,
2018, as a reduction of additional paid-in capital and an increase in the carrying value of the Series F Preferred Shares. The accretion is presented in the Statement of Operations
as a deemed dividend, increasing net loss to arrive at net loss attributable to common stockholders.

Preferred Stock Conversion and Elimination

On February 6, 2018, 15,756 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Shares”) were converted into 262,606 shares of common stock.

On  March  6,  2018,  the  Company  received  conversion  notices  (in  accordance  with  original  terms)  from  holders  of  100%  of  the  outstanding  shares  of  Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Shares”), Series B Preferred Shares and Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series E Preferred Shares”) and issued
an aggregate of 7,945,250 shares of common stock to such holders.

The shares of Series E Preferred Stock were held by Dr. Denver Lough, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer. On March 6, 2018, the Company entered into
a new registration rights agreement (the “Lough Registration Rights Agreement”) with Dr. Lough, pursuant to which the Company agreed to file a registration statement to
register the resale of 7,050,000 shares of common stock issued upon conversion of the Series E Preferred Shares within six months, to cause such registration statement to be
declared  effective  by  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  as  promptly  as  possible  following  its  filing.  On  March  14,  2019,  the  Company’s  registration  obligation  was
waived, and the Lough Registration Rights Agreement amended to provide that Dr. Lough may demand registration by written request to the Company. Dr. Lough demanded
registration of his 7,050,000 common shares in August 2019, and pursuant to that demand a registration statement on Form S-3 was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission in October 2019 and declared effective November 1, 2019. The Company is obligated to keep the registration statement effective until the earlier of the date all the
registered shares have been sold pursuant to the registration statement or the date one year from the date the registration statement is first effective.

On March 7, 2018, the Company filed a Certificate of Elimination with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware terminating the Company’s Series A, Series B,
Series C, Series D, Series E and Series F Preferred Stock. As a result, the Company has 25,000,000 shares of authorized and unissued preferred stock as of December 31, 2019
with no designation as to series.

Convertible preferred stock activity for the year ended October 31, 2018 consisted of the following:

Series A
Series B
Series C
Series D
Series E
Series F
Total

Shares
Outstanding -
October 31, 2017

Preferred Stock Conversions
and Series F Exchange –
During the Year Ended
October 31, 2018

Common Stock Shares Issued –
During the Year Ended
October 31, 2018

3,146,671   
47,689   
2,578   
26,667   
7,050   
6,455   
3,237,110   

(3,146,671)  
(47,689)  
(2,578)  
(26,667)  
(7,050)  
(6,455)  
(3,237,110)  

713,036 
794,820 
59,950 
44,445 
7,050,000 
972,070 
9,634,321 

There was no convertible preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

F-22

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

2020, 2019 and 2017 Equity Incentive Plans

2020 Plan

On October 25, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved the Company’s 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2020 Plan”). The 2020
Plan  became  effective  on  December  19,  2019,  the  date  approved  by  the  stockholders.  The  2020  Plan  provides  for  the  grant  of  incentive  stock  options,  nonqualified  stock
options,  restricted  stock,  restricted  stock  units,  stock  appreciation  rights,  unrestricted  stock  awards,  dividend  equivalent  rights,  and  cash-based  awards  to  the  Company’s
employees, officers, directors and consultants. The Compensation Committee of the Board will administer the 2020 Plan, including determining which eligible participants will
receive awards, the number of shares of common stock subject to the awards and the terms and conditions of such awards. Up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock are issuable
pursuant to awards under the 2020 Plan. No grants of awards may be made under the 2020 Plan after the later of December 19, 2029, or the tenth anniversary of the latest
material amendment of the 2020 Plan and no grants of incentive stock options may be made after October 25, 2029. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had 3,000,000
shares available for future issuances under the 2020 Plan.

2019 Plan

On October 5, 2018, the Company’s Board approved the Company’s 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”). The 2019 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock
options,  nonqualified  stock  options,  restricted  stock,  restricted  stock  units,  stock  appreciation  rights  and  other  types  of  stock-based  awards  to  the  Company’s  employees,
officers, directors and consultants. The Compensation Committee of the Board will administer the 2019 Plan, including determining which eligible participants will receive
awards,  the  number  of  shares  of  common  stock  subject  to  the  awards  and  the  terms  and  conditions  of  such  awards.  Up  to  3,000,000  shares  of  common  stock  are  issuable
pursuant to awards under the 2019 Plan. Unless earlier terminated by the Board, the 2019 Plan shall terminate at the close of business on October 5, 2028. As of December 31,
2019, the Company had approximately 273,649 shares available for future issuances under the 2019 Plan.

2017 Plan

On December 1, 2016, the Company’s Board approved the Company’s 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”). The purpose of the 2017 Plan is to promote the
success  of  the  Company  and  to  increase  stockholder  value  by  providing  an  additional  means  through  the  grant  of  awards  to  attract,  motivate,  retain  and  reward  selected
employees, consultants and other eligible persons. The 2017 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock
units, stock appreciation rights and other types of stock-based awards to the Company’s employees, officers, directors and consultants. The Compensation Committee of the
Board will administer the 2017 Plan, including determining which eligible participants will receive awards, the number of shares of common stock subject to the awards and the
terms and conditions of such awards. Up to 7,300,000 shares of common stock are issuable pursuant to awards under the 2017 Plan. Unless earlier terminated by the Board, the
2017  Plan  shall  terminate  at  the  close  of  business  on  December  1,  2026. As  of  December  31,  2019,  the  Company  had  approximately  2,079,608  shares  available  for  future
issuances under the 2017 Plan.

A summary of the Company’s employee and non-employee stock option activity is presented below:

Outstanding - December 31, 2018
Granted
Exercised (1)
Forfeited
Outstanding – December 31, 2019
Options exercisable, December 31, 2019

Number of
shares

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

6,499,885   
904,403   
(292,417)  
(2,581,883)  
4,529,988   
3,198,887   

$
$
$
$
$
$

14.02 
12.75 
4.31 
8.19 
15.26 
14.94 

(1) The number of exercised options includes shares withheld on behalf of employees to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding requirements.

F-23

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the two months ended December 31, 2018 and the year ended October 31, 2018, the estimated weighted-average grant-date
fair  value  of  options  granted  was  $9.14,  $9.95,  and  $17.56  per  share,  respectively.  The  intrinsic  value  of  options  exercised  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2019,  the  two
months ended December 31, 2018 and the year ended October 31, 2018 was $3.5 million, $1.6 million, and $2.1 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31,
2019,  the  two  months  ended  December  31,  2018  and  the  year  ended  October  31,  2018,  the  estimated  total  grant-date  fair  value  of  options  vested  was  $32.0  million,  $5.2
million, and $20.0 million, respectively.

The  aggregate  intrinsic  value  of  options  outstanding  and  exercisable  at  December  31,  2019  was  $0.  The  weighted  average  remaining  contractual  term  of  options

outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2019 was 8.1 years and 7.7 years, respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)

In May 2018, the Company adopted the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). The Company has initially reserved 500,000 shares of common stock for purchase
under the ESPP. The initial offering period began January 1, 2019 and ended on June 30, 2019 with the first purchase  date.  Subsequent  offering  periods  will  automatically
commence on each January 1 and July 1 and will have a duration of six months ending with a purchase date June 30 and December 31 of each year. On each purchase date,
ESPP  participants  will  purchase  shares  of  common  stock  at  a  price  per  share  equal  to  85%  of  the  lesser  of  (1)  the  fair  market  value  per  share  of  the  common  stock  on  the
offering date or (2) the fair market value of the common stock on the purchase date.

Stock Options and ESPP Valuation

The fair value of each option grant and ESPP purchase right is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following range of

assumptions:

Option grants
Risk free annual interest rate
Expected volatility
Expected term of options (years)
Assumed dividends
ESPP
Risk free annual interest rate
Expected volatility
Expected term of options (years)
Assumed dividends

For the Year Ended
December 31,
2019

For the Two Months Ended
December 31,
2018

For the Year Ended
October 31,
2018

1.4% - 2.7% 
80.8% - 97.5% 
5.0 - 7.0 
– 

2.1% - 2.5% 
76.6% - 88.9% 

0.5 
– 

F-24

2.6% - 3.2% 
80.6% - 94.4% 
5.0 - 6.5 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 

2.0% - 3.2%
80.9% - 96.5%

5.0-6.0 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Total stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, restricted stock awards, and ESPP was as follows (in thousands):

For the Year
Ended December 31,
2019

For the Two Months Ended
December 31,
2018

For the Year
Ended October 31,
2018

General and administrative expense
Research and development expense
Sales and marketing expense

Total stock-based compensation expense
Stock-based compensation expense classified as a liability
Stock-based compensation expense classified to equity (1)

$

$
$
$

27,692 
2,643 
1,067 
31,402 
– 
31,440 

$

$
$
$

7,505   
919   
522   
8,946   
38   
8,908   

$

$
$
$

31,982 
6,322 
517 
38,821 
– 
38,821 

(1) The year ended December 31, 2019 includes $38,000 reclassified from liability to equity.

As of December 31, 2019, there was approximately $3.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock option awards, which is expected to be recognized

over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 0.5 years.

Stock-based compensation related to the ESPP for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $49,000. A total of 36,177 shares of common stock were purchased at a

weighted-average purchase price of $2.74 for total proceeds of $0.1 million pursuant to the ESPP during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Restricted Stock

A summary of the Company’s employee and non-employee restricted-stock activity is presented below:

Unvested - December 31, 2018
Granted
Vested (1)
Forfeited
Unvested – December 31, 2019

Number of
shares

651,110 
2,202,672 
(830,667)
(180,114)
1,843,001 

(1) T h e number  of  vested  restricted  stock  units  includes  shares  that  were  withheld  on  behalf  of  employees  to  satisfy  the  minimum  statutory tax  withholding

requirements.

The  weighted-average  grant-date  fair  value  of  restricted  stock  granted  during  the  year  ended  December  31,  2019,  two  months  ended  December  31,  2018  and  year
ended October 31, 2018 was $4.74, $14.17, and $25.27 per share, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock vested during the year ended December 31, 2019, two
months ended December 31, 2018 and year ended October 31, 2018 was approximately $12.4 million, $2.1 million and $2.9 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2019, there was approximately $5.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards, which is expected to

be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.1 years.

14. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

The Company’s 401(k) Plan is a deferred salary arrangement under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the 401(k) Plan, participating employees (full-
time employees with the Company for one year) may defer a portion of their pre-tax earnings, up to the IRS annual contribution limit ($19,000 for calendar year 2019). The
Company contributes 3% of employee’s eligible earnings. The Company recorded contribution expense related to its 401(k) Plan of $0.3 million for the year ended December
31, 2019, $35,000 for the two months ended December 31, 2018, and $0.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2018.

F-25

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15. INCOME TAXES

The Company calculates its provision for federal and state income taxes based on current tax law. The provision (benefit) for income taxes consisted of the following

(in thousands):

Current:

Federal
State
Deferred:
Federal
State

Change in: valuation allowance
Total provision (benefit) for income taxes

For the Year
Ended December 31,
2019

For the Two Months Ended
December 31,
2018

For the Year
Ended October 31,
2018

$

$

– 
– 

(19,057)  
(8,595)  
27,652 
– 

$

$

$

–   
–   

(3,734)  
(257)  
3,991   
–   

$

(302)
– 

(11,561)
(475)
12,036 
(302)

The  difference  between  income  taxes  computed  at  the  statutory  federal  rate  and  the  provision  for  income  taxes  related  to  the  following  (in  thousands,  except

percentages):

Tax (benefit) at federal statutory rate
State income taxes, net of federal income taxes
Effect of warrant liability
Effect of other permanent items
Effect of stock compensation
Change in valuation allowance
Effect of State NOL tracking
Reduction of NOL’s due to Section 382 limitations
Other

For the Year
Ended December 31,
2019

For the Two Months Ended
December 31,
2018

  For the Year Ended October 31  
2018

Amount

Percent of
Pretax Income 

Amount

Percent of
Pretax Income  

  Amount

Percent of
Pretax Income  

  $

  $

(19,423)    
(8,595)    
–     
418     
129     
27,652     
–     
–    
(181)     
–     

21%   $
9%    
–%    
–%    
–%    
(30)%   
–%    
–%    
–%    
–%   $

(3,867)    
(254)    
–     
5     
27     
3,991     
–     
101     
98     
–     

21%   $
1%    
–%    
–%    
–%    
(22)%   
–%    
–%    
– %   
–%   $

(22,325)    
(475)    
(1,120)    
30     
–     
12,036     
–     
11,552     
–     
(302)    

34%
(1)%
2%
–%
–%
(18)%
–%
(17)%
–%
–%

The components of deferred income tax assets (liabilities) were as follows (in thousands):

Leases
Depreciation and amortization
Compensation expense not deductible until options are exercised
All other temporary differences
Net operating loss carry forward
Less valuation allowance
Deferred tax asset (liability)

  $

  $

As of December 31,
2019

As of December 31,
2018

38    $

(956)  
18,295   
934   
32,113   
(50,424)  

–    $

F-26

– 
(533)
12,543 
236 
10,526 
(22,772)
– 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realization  of  deferred  tax  assets,  including  those  related  to  net  operating  loss  carryforwards,  are  dependent  upon  future  earnings,  if  any,  of  which  the  timing  and
amount  are  uncertain.  Accordingly,  the  net  deferred  tax  assets  have  been  fully  offset  by  a  valuation  allowance.  Based  upon  the  Company’s  current  operating  results
management cannot conclude that it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized.

Utilization  of  the  net  operating  loss  carryforwards  may  be  subject  to  a  substantial  annual  limitation  due  to  the  “change  in  ownership”  provisions  of  the  Internal
Revenue Code. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating loss carryforwards before utilization. The federal net operating loss carryforwards available for
income tax purposes at December 31, 2019 amounts to approximately $120.3 million. Of this amount, $38.5 million will expire between 2037 and 2038 and $81.8 million will
have an indefinite life. The federal net operating losses with an indefinite life can only offset 80% of taxable income in any one tax year. Approximately $145.1 million for state
income taxes will primarily expire between 2032 and 2033.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. and various states. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits, which would impact
its tax rate if recognized. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had no accrual for the potential payment of penalties or interest. As of December 31, 2019, the Company was
not subject to any U.S. federal, and state tax examinations. The Company does not anticipate any significant changes in its unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months.

16. LOSS PER SHARE

The following outstanding potentially dilutive shares have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share for the periods presented due to their anti-

dilutive effect:

Stock options
Unvested restricted stock grants

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Contingencies

December 31,
2019

December 31,
2018

October 31
2018

4,529,988   
1,843,001   

6,499,885   
651,110   

6,080,505 
673,960 

On June 26, 2018, a class action complaint alleging violations of the Federal securities laws was filed in the United States District Court, District of Utah, by Jose
Moreno against the Company and two directors of the Company, Case No. 2:18-cv-00510-JNP (the “Moreno Complaint”). On July 6, 2018, a similar complaint was filed in the
same court against the same defendants by Yedid Lawi, Case No. 2:18-cv-00541-PMW (the “Lawi Complaint”). Both the Moreno Complaint and Lawi Complaint allege that
the defendants made or were responsible for, disseminating information to the public through reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other channels that
contained material misstatements or omissions in violation of Sections 10 and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 adopted thereunder. Specifically, both complaints
allege  that  the  defendants  misrepresented  the  status  of  one  of  the  Company’s  patent  applications  while  touting  the  unique  nature  of  the  Company’s  technology  and  its
effectiveness.  Plaintiffs  are  seeking  damages  suffered  by  them  and  the  class  consisting  of  the  persons  who  acquired  the  publicly-traded  securities  of  the  Company  between
March  31,  2017,  and  June  22,  2018.  Plaintiffs  have  filed  motions  to  consolidate  and  for  appointment  as  lead  plaintiff.  On  November  28,  2018,  the  Court  consolidated  the
Moreno and Lawi cases under the caption In re PolarityTE, Inc. Securities Litigation (the “Consolidated Securities Litigation”), and requested the appointment of the plaintiff in
Lawi as the lead plaintiff. On January 16, 2019, the Court granted the motion of Yedid Lawi for appointment as lead plaintiff, and on February 1, 2019, the Court granted the
lead plaintiff’s motion for approval of lead counsel and liaison counsel. The Court also ordered that the lead plaintiff file and serve a consolidated complaint no later than 60
days after February 1, 2019. The Lead Plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint on Aril 2, 2019, and asserted essentially the same violations of Federal securities laws recited in
the original complaints. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint on June 3, 2019. Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Company’s motion to dismiss was filed
on August 2, 2019, and the Company filed a reply to the opposition on September 13, 2019. A hearing on the Company’s motion to dismiss was held on November 19, 2019; no
order has been issued to date. At this early stage of the proceedings the Company is unable to make any prediction regarding the outcome of the litigation.

F-27

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In November 2018, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court, District of Utah, with the caption Monther v. Lough, et al., case no.
2:18-cv-00791-TC, alleging violations of the Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment on the part of certain officers and directors based on the facts and
circumstances recited in the Consolidated Securities Litigation. On November 26, 2018, the court issued an order staying all proceedings until after the disposition of motions to
dismiss the Consolidated Securities Litigation.

Other Matters

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may become involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations, proceedings, and threats of litigation relating to intellectual
property, commercial arrangements, employment, regulatory compliance, and other matters. Except as noted above, at December 31, 2019, the Company was not party to any
legal  or  arbitration  proceedings  that  may  have  significant  effects  on  its  financial  position  or  results  of  operations.  No  governmental  proceedings  are  pending  or,  to  the
Company’s knowledge, contemplated against the Company. The Company is not a party to any material proceedings in which any director, member of senior management or
affiliate of the Company’s is either a party adverse to the Company or its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to the Company or its subsidiaries.

Commitments

The Company has entered into employment agreements with key executives that contain severance terms and change of control provisions.

18. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

On August 21, 2019, the Company and Dr. Denver Lough, a principal shareholder and former officer and director, signed a settlement terms agreement that provides,
in part, that the Company pay to Dr. Lough $1,500,000 in cash on October 1, 2019 and an additional $1,500,000 in cash in equal monthly installments beginning November 1,
2019 and ending April 1, 2021. In addition, the Company agreed to award to Dr. Lough 200,000 restricted stock units that vest in 18 equal monthly installments beginning
October  1,  2019.  For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2019  the  Company  recognized  $2.9  million  of  severance  expense  related  to  the  cash  portion  of  the  agreement. As  of
December 31, 2019, the Company has recorded a liability of $1.3 million related to future cash payments under the agreement. The fair value of the restricted stock units was
$0.8 million and was fully expensed upon Dr. Lough’s termination.

In October 2018, the Company entered into an office lease covering approximately 7,250 square feet of rental space in the building located at 40 West 57th Street in
New York City. The lease is for a term of three years. The annual lease rate is $60 per square foot. Initially the Company will occupy and pay for only 3,275 square feet of
space, and the Company is not obligated under the lease to pay for the remaining 3,975 square feet covered by the lease unless we elect to occupy that additional space. The
Company believes the terms of the lease are very favorable to us, and the Company obtained these favorable terms through the assistance of Peter A. Cohen, a director, which
he provided so that the company he owns, Peter A. Cohen, LLC (“Cohen LLC”), could sublease a portion of the office space.

During 2019, the Company increased the space leased from 3,275 square feet to 6,232 square feet. The Company is using 1,648 square feet, and Cohen LLC is using
approximately 4,584 square feet as of December 31, 2019. The monthly lease payment for 6,232 square feet is $31,160. Of this amount $22,920 is allocated pro rata to Cohen
LLC  based  on  square  footage  occupied. Additional  lease  charges  for  operating  expenses  and  taxes  are  allocated  under  the  sublease  based  on  the  ratio  of  rent  paid  by  the
Company and Cohen LLC to total rent. Once the space is fully occupied, the Company will reduce the overall annual lease rate for the Cohen LLC space to $58.60 per square
foot. The Company recognized $0.3 million and $21,000 of sublease income related to this agreement for the year ended December 31, 2019 and two months ended December
31, 2018, respectively. The sublease income is included in other income, net in the statement of operations. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there were no
amounts due from the related party under this agreement.

In August  2018,  David  Seaburg  was  elected  by  the  Board  of  Directors  to  serve  as  a  director  of  the  Company.  Subsequently,  the  Company  entered  into  a  written
consulting agreement with Mr. Seaburg, which terminated effective March 11, 2019 when he joined the Company as President of Corporate Development. Mr. Seaburg has
since resigned from his Director position and is now serving as President of the Company.

F-28

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
19. SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company’s operations involve products and services which are managed separately. Accordingly, it operates in two segments: 1) regenerative medicine and 2)

contract services.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s CODM changed the reporting of segment net income and loss to allocate additional noncash expenses from
the  regenerative  medicine  segment  to  the  contract  services  segment.  For  the  two  months  ended  December  31,  2018  and  the  year  ended  October  31,  2018,  this  resulted  in
reallocation of noncash expense of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The change is reflected in the two months ended December 31, 2018 and the year ended October
31, 2018 net loss amounts presented below.

Certain information concerning the Company’s segments is presented in the following tables (in thousands):

Net revenues:

Reportable segments:

Regenerative medicine
Contract services

Total net revenues

Net loss:

Reportable segments:

Regenerative medicine
Contract services
Total net loss

Identifiable assets employed:

Reportable segments:

Regenerative medicine
Contract services
Total assets

For the Year
Ended December 31,
2019

For the Two Months
Ended December 31,
2018

For the Year
Ended October 31,
2018

$

$

$

$

2,353 
3,299 
5,652 

(91,259)  
(1,234)  
(92,493)  

$

$

$

$

210   
463   
673   

(18,242)  
(176)  
(18,418)  

$

$

$

$

689 
874 
1,563 

(64,887)
(554)
(65,441)

December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

  $

  $

F-29

48,615    $
4,984   
53,599    $

74,795 
5,371 
80,166 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
20. TRANSITION PERIOD COMPARATIVE FINANCIALS (UNAUDITED)

The Company changed its fiscal year end from October 31 to December 31 effective December 31, 2018. The unaudited consolidated results of operations for the year

ended December 31, 2018 and the two month ended December 31, 2017 were as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended
December 31,
2018

For the Two Months
Ended December 31,
2017

(Unaudited)

Net revenues
Products
Services

Total net revenues

Cost of sales
Products
Services

Total costs of sales

Gross profit
Operating costs and expenses
Research and development
General and administrative
Sales and marketing

Total operating costs and expenses

Operating loss

Other income (expense)
Interest income, net
Other income, net
Change in fair value of derivatives
Loss on extinguishment of warrant liability

Loss before income taxes
Benefit for income taxes
Net loss
Deemed dividend – accretion of discount on Series F preferred stock
Deemed dividend – exchange of Series F preferred stock
Cumulative dividends on Series F preferred stock
Net loss attributable to common stockholders

Net loss per share, basic and diluted:
Net loss
Deemed dividend – accretion of discount on Series F preferred stock
Deemed dividend – exchange of Series F preferred stock
Cumulative dividends on Series F preferred stock
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted

F-30

$

$

$

886   
1,337   
2,223   

693   
689   
1,382   
841   

17,904   
52,912   
5,090   
75,906   
(75,065)  

457   
32   
1,850   
(520)  
(73,246)  
302   
(72,944)  
(697)  
(7,057)  
(191)  
(80,889)  

(4.36)  
(0.04)  
(0.42)  
(0.01)  
(4.83)  
16,734,610   

$

$

$

13 
– 
13 

1 
– 
1 
12 

4,930 
7,979 
– 
12,909 
(12,897)

18 
– 
1,964 
– 
(10,915)
– 
(10,915)
(593)
– 
(182)
(11,690)

(1.68)
(0.09)
– 
(0.03)
(1.80)
6,496,841 

 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
    
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Exhibit 4.7

As of December 31, 2019, PolarityTE, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company”) had two classes of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended: our common stock and preferred stock. The following description summarizes the material terms and provisions of our common stock and preferred stock.
The following description of our capital stock does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws,
which are exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K to which this document is attached as an exhibit, and by applicable law. You should read those documents for provisions
that may be important to you. The terms of our common stock and preferred stock may also be affected by Delaware law.

Authorized Capital Stock

Our authorized capital stock consists of 250,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001

per share, all of which are undesignated preferred stock except for 100,000 shares designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.

Common Stock

The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders. The holders of our common stock
do not have any cumulative voting rights. Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably any dividends declared by our board of directors out of funds legally
available for that purpose, subject to any preferential dividend rights of any outstanding preferred stock. Our common stock has no preemptive rights, conversion rights or other
subscription rights or redemption or sinking fund provisions.

In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of our common stock will be entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of all

debts and other liabilities and any liquidation preference of any outstanding preferred stock. All outstanding shares are fully paid and non-assessable.

Preferred Stock

Our board of directors is authorized to issue up to 25,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock in one or more series without stockholder approval. Our board of
directors  may  determine  the  rights,  preferences,  privileges  and  restrictions,  including  voting  rights,  dividend  rights,  conversion  rights,  redemption  privileges  and  liquidation
preferences, of each series of preferred stock.

The purpose of authorizing our board of directors to issue preferred stock in one or more series and determine the number of shares in the series and its rights and

preferences is to eliminate delays associated with a stockholder vote on specific issuances. Examples of rights and preferences that the board of directors may fix are:

●
●
●
●

dividend rights;
conversion rights;
voting rights;
preemptive rights;

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
●
●
●
●

terms of redemption;
liquidation preferences;
sinking fund terms; and
the number of shares constituting, or the designation of, such series, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of common stock.

The existence of authorized but unissued shares of undesignated preferred stock may enable our board of directors to render more difficult or to discourage an attempt
to obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise. For example, if in the due exercise of its fiduciary obligations, our board of directors were
to determine that a takeover proposal is not in the best interests of us or our stockholders, our board of directors could cause shares of preferred stock to be issued without
stockholder  approval  in  one  or  more  private  offerings  or  other  transactions  that  might  dilute  the  voting  or  other  rights  of  the  proposed  acquirer,  stockholder  or  stockholder
group. The rights of holders of our common stock described above, will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of any preferred stock that we may designate
and issue in the future. The issuance of shares of undesignated preferred stock could decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to holders of shares of
common  stock.  The  issuance  may  also  adversely  affect  the  rights  and  powers,  including  voting  rights,  of  these  holders  and  may  have  the  effect  of  delaying,  deterring  or
preventing a change in control of us.

In connection with the adoption of the Rights Agreement described below, we filed a Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of
PolarityTE, Inc. (the “Certificate of Designation”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, which designated 100,000 shares of Preferred Stock as Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock. The Rights Agreement is described in more detail below.

Rights Agreement

On November 7, 2019, the Board authorized and declared a dividend to stockholders of record at the close of business on November 18, 2019 (the “Record Date”) of
one preferred share purchase right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of our common stock. Each Right entitles the holder to purchase from us one one-thousandth (subject
to adjustment) of one share of our Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Preferred Stock”) at an exercise price of $12.00 per one one-
thousandth of a share of Preferred Stock (the “Purchase Price”). The complete terms of the Rights are set forth in the Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”), dated as of
November 7, 2019, between us and Equity Stock Transfer, LLC, as rights agent.

Generally, the Rights Agreement works by imposing a significant penalty upon any person or group (including a group of persons that are acting in concert with each
other)  that  acquires  10%  or  more  (or  20%  or  more  in  the  case  of  a  “Passive  Institutional  Investor,”  as  defined  in  the  Rights Agreement)  of  our  common  stock  without  the
approval of the Board. As a result, the overall effect of the Rights Agreement and the issuance of the Rights may be to render more difficult or discourage a tender or exchange
offer or other acquisition of our common stock that is not approved by the Board. The Rights Agreement does not prevent the Board from considering any offer that it considers
to be in the best interest of its stockholders.

The following is a summary of the terms of the Rights Agreement. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Rights Agreement, a

copy of which is filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K that we filed with the SEC on November 7, 2019 and which is incorporated by reference herein.

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Distribution and Transfer of Rights; Rights Certificates

The Board has declared a dividend of one Right for each outstanding share of our common stock. Prior to the Distribution Date referred to below:

●

●

●

●

the Rights will be evidenced by and trade with the certificates for the shares of our common stock (or, with respect to any uncertificated common stock registered in
book-entry form, by notation in book-entry), and no separate rights certificates will be distributed;
new  certificates for  shares  of  our  common  stock  issued  after  the  Record  Date  will  contain  a  legend  incorporating  the  Rights  Agreement  by  reference (for
uncertificated shares of Common Stock registered in book-entry form, this legend will be contained in a notation in book-entry);
the  surrender  for transfer  of  any  certificates  for  shares  of  our  common  stock  (or  the  surrender  for  transfer  of  any  uncertificated  shares  of our  common  stock
registered in book-entry form) will also constitute the transfer of the Rights associated with such shares of our common stock; and
the Rights will accompany any new shares of our common stock that are issued after the Record Date.

Distribution Date

Subject to certain exceptions specified in the Rights Agreement, the Rights will separate from the shares of our common stock and become exercisable following the
earlier of (i) the tenth (10th) business day after a public announcement that either discloses that a person or a group of related persons has acquired beneficial ownership of 10%
or more (or 20% or more in the case of a Passive Institutional Investor) of the shares of our common stock other than as a result of repurchases of shares of our common stock
by us or certain inadvertent acquisitions (an “Acquiring Person”) or information which reveals the existence of an Acquiring Person, or (ii) the tenth (10 th) business day (or, if
such tenth (10th) business day occurs before the Record Date, the close of business on the Record Date), or such later date as may be determined by the Board, after a person or
a group of related persons announce or commence a tender or exchange offer that would result in a person or a group of related persons becoming an Acquiring Person. For
purposes of the Rights Agreement, beneficial ownership is defined to include the ownership of derivative securities.

The date on which the Rights separate from the shares of our common stock and become exercisable is referred to as the “Distribution Date.”

After the Distribution Date, we will mail Rights certificates to the Company’s stockholders as of the close of business on the Distribution Date and the Rights will

become transferable apart from the shares of our common stock. Thereafter, such Rights certificates alone will represent the Rights.

Exempt Persons

The Rights Agreement provides that an Acquiring Person does not include the Company, any subsidiary of the Company, any employee benefit plan of the Company
or  any  subsidiary  of  the  Company,  or  any  person  holding  shares  of  our  common  stock  for  or  pursuant  to  the  terms  of  any  such  employee  benefit  plan  of  the  Company.  In
addition, certain inadvertent acquisitions will not trigger the occurrence of the Distribution Date. The Rights Agreement also provides that any person that would otherwise be
deemed an Acquiring Person as of the date of the adoption of the Rights Agreement will be exempted but only for so long as neither it nor any of its Related Persons (as defined
in  the  Rights Agreement)  acquire  or  are  deemed  to  acquire,  without  the  prior  approval  of  the  Board,  beneficial  ownership  of  any  additional  shares  of  our  common  stock
following the adoption of the Rights Agreement.

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Grandfathered Persons

The  Rights Agreement  provides  that  a  “Grandfathered  Person”  means  any  Person  which,  together  with  all  of  its Affiliates  and Associates,  is,  as  of  the  date  of  the
Agreement, the Beneficial Owner of 20% or more of the shares of our common stock then outstanding; provided, however, that such Person shall cease to be a Grandfathered
Person and shall become an Acquiring Person if such Person exceeds its Grandfathered Percentage (as defined in the Rights Agreement) by 0.01% or more of the shares of our
common stock, subject to certain exemptions for (i) any unilateral grant of any security by the Company, (ii) the exercise of any options, warrants, rights or similar interests, (iii)
the grant of stock options pursuant to any written agreement with us and (iv) any increase in the percentage of stock ownership as a result of any Company stock repurchases.

Preferred Stock Purchasable Upon Exercise of Rights

After the Distribution Date, each Right will entitle the holder to purchase, for the Purchase Price, one one-thousandth of a share of Preferred Stock having economic
and other terms similar to that of one share of our common stock. This portion of a share of Preferred Stock is intended to give a stockholder approximately the same dividend,
voting and liquidation rights as would one share of our common stock.

Flip-In Trigger

If a person or group of related persons becomes an Acquiring Person, then each Right will entitle the holder thereof to purchase, upon payment of the Purchase Price,
in accordance with the terms of the Rights Agreement, in lieu of a number of one one-thousandths of a share of Preferred Stock, a number of shares of our common stock (or, in
certain  circumstances,  cash,  property  or  other  securities  of  the  Company)  having  a  then-current  market  value  of  twice  the  Purchase  Price.  However,  the  Rights  are  not
exercisable following the occurrence of the foregoing event until such time as the Rights are no longer redeemable by us, as further described below.

Following the occurrence of an event set forth in the preceding paragraph, all Rights that are or, under certain circumstances specified in the Rights Agreement, were

beneficially owned by an Acquiring Person or certain of its transferees will be null and void.

Flip-Over Trigger

If, after an Acquiring Person obtains 10% or more (or 20% or more in the case of a Passive Institutional Investor) of the shares of our common stock, (i) we merge into
another entity, (ii) an acquiring entity merges into us, and, in connection with such transaction, all or part of the outstanding shares of our common stock are converted into
stock or other securities of another entity, cash, or other property or (iii) we sell or transfer 50% or more of the Company’s assets or earning power, then each Right (except for
Rights that have previously been voided as set forth above) will entitle the holder thereof to purchase, upon payment of the Purchase Price, in accordance with the terms of the
Rights Agreement, a number of shares of common stock of the person engaging in the transaction having a then-current market value of twice the Purchase Price.

4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Redemption of the Rights

The  Rights  will  be  redeemable  at  the  Board’s  sole  discretion  for  $0.001  per  Right  (payable  in  cash,  shares  of  our  common  stock  or  other  consideration  deemed
appropriate  by  the  Board)  at  any  time  ending  on  the  earlier  of  (i)  the  tenth  (10th)  business  day  (or  such  later  date  as  may  be  determined  by  the  Board)  after  the  public
announcement that a person has acquired beneficial ownership of 10% or more (or 20% or more in the case of a Passive Institutional Investor) of the shares of our common
stock and (ii) the final expiration date of the Rights Agreement. Until such time as the Rights are no longer redeemable by us, the Rights are not exercisable. Immediately upon
the  action  of  the  Board  ordering  redemption,  the  Rights  will  terminate  and  the  only  right  of  the  holders  of  the  Rights  will  be  to  receive  the  $0.001  redemption  price.  The
redemption price will be adjusted if we undertake a stock dividend, a stock split or similar transaction.

Exchange Provision

At  any  time  after  the  date  on  which  a  person  beneficially  owns  10%  or  more  (or  20%  or  more  in  the  case  of  a  Passive  Institutional  Investor)  of  the  shares  of  our
common stock and prior to the acquisition by the person of 50% or more of the shares of our common stock, the Board may exchange the Rights (other than Rights owned by
the Acquiring Person or any Related Person, which would have become void), in whole or in part, for shares of our common stock at an exchange ratio (subject to adjustment)
of one share of our common stock per Right (or, if insufficient shares are available, we may issue preferred stock, cash, debt or equity securities, property or a combination
thereof in exchange for the Rights).

Expiration of the Rights

The Rights expire at or prior to the earlier of (i) November 7, 2020 or (ii) the redemption or exchange of the Rights as described above.

Amendment of Terms of Rights Agreement and Rights

The terms of the Rights and the Rights Agreement may be amended by action of the Board in any respect without the consent of the holders of the Rights on or prior to
the time a person becomes an Acquiring Person. Thereafter, the terms of the Rights and the Rights Agreement may not be supplemented or amended in any manner that would
adversely affect the interests of the holders of the Rights.

Rights of Holders

Until a Right is exercised, the holder thereof, as such, will have no rights as a stockholder of the Company, including, without limitation, the right to vote or to receive

dividends.

Anti-Dilution Provisions

The Board may adjust the Purchase Price, the number of shares of Preferred Stock issuable and the number of outstanding Rights to prevent dilution that may occur

from a stock dividend, a stock split or a reclassification of the Preferred Stock or common stock.

With certain exceptions, no adjustments to the Purchase Price will be made until the cumulative adjustments amount to at least 1% of the Purchase Price.

5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taxes

The distribution of Rights should not be taxable for federal income tax purposes. However, following an event that renders the Rights exercisable or upon redemption

of the Rights, stockholders may recognize taxable income.

Certain Anti-Takeover Effects

The Rights are not intended to prevent a takeover of the Company and should not interfere with any merger or other business combination approved by the Board.
However,  the  Rights  may  cause  substantial  dilution  to  a  person  or  group  that  acquires  beneficial  ownership  of  10%  or  more  (or  20%  or  more  in  the  case  of  a  Passive
Institutional Investor) of the outstanding shares of our common stock (which includes for this purpose stock referenced in derivative transactions and securities).

Antitakeover Effects of Delaware Law and Provisions of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws

Certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law and of our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws could have the effect of
delaying, deferring or discouraging another party from acquiring control of us unless such takeover or change of control is approved by the board of directors. These provisions,
which  are  summarized  below,  are  expected  to  discourage  certain  types  of  coercive  takeover  practices  and  inadequate  takeover  bids  and,  therefore,  they  might  also  inhibit
temporary fluctuations in the market price of our common stock that often result from actual or rumored hostile takeover attempts. These provisions are also designed in part to
encourage  anyone  seeking  to  acquire  control  of  us  to  first  negotiate  with  our  board  of  directors.  These  provisions  might  also  have  the  effect  of  preventing  changes  in  our
management. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish transactions that stockholders might otherwise deem to be in their best interests.
However, we believe that the advantages gained by protecting our ability to negotiate with any unsolicited and potentially unfriendly acquirer outweigh the disadvantages of
discouraging such proposals, including those priced above the then-current market value of our common stock, because, among other reasons, the negotiation of such proposals
could improve their terms.

Delaware Takeover Statute. We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. In general, Section 203 prohibits a publicly
held Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a three-year period following the time that this stockholder becomes
an  interested  stockholder,  unless  the  business  combination  is  approved  in  a  prescribed  manner.  Under  Section  203,  a  business  combination  between  a  corporation  and  an
interested stockholder is prohibited unless it satisfies one of the following conditions:

●

●

●

before the  stockholder  became  interested,  our  board  of  directors  approved  either  the  business  combination  or  the  transaction  which resulted  in  the  stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder;
upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder  owned at least 85% of the
voting  stock  of  the  corporation  outstanding  at  the  time  the  transaction  commenced,  excluding  for purposes  of  determining  the  voting  stock  outstanding,  shares
owned by persons who are directors and also officers, and employee stock plans, in some instances, but not the outstanding voting stock owned by the interested
stockholder; or
at or  after  the  time  the  stockholder  became  interested,  the  business  combination  was  approved  by  our  board  of  directors  and  authorized at  an  annual  or  special
meeting of the stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the interested stockholder.

6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
●
●
●
●
●

●

Section 203 defines a business combination to include:
any merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the interested stockholder;
any sale, transfer, lease, pledge, exchange, mortgage or other disposition involving the interested stockholder of 10% or more of the assets of the corporation;
subject to exceptions, any transaction that results in the issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the corporation to the interested stockholder;
subject to exceptions, any transaction involving the corporation that has the effect of increasing the proportionate share of the stock  of  any  class  or  series  of  the
corporation beneficially owned by the interested stockholder; or
the receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits provided by or through the corporation.

In general, Section 203 defines an interested stockholder as any entity or person beneficially owning 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation

and any entity or person affiliated with or controlling or controlled by the entity or person.

Provisions of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws. Our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
include  several  provisions  that  may  have  the  effect  of  delaying,  deferring  or  discouraging  another  party  from  acquiring  control  of  us  and  encouraging  persons  considering
unsolicited tender offers or other unilateral takeover proposals to negotiate with our board of directors rather than pursue non-negotiated takeover attempts. These provisions
include the items described below.

Board composition and filling vacancies. In accordance with our restated certificate of incorporation, our board is divided into three classes serving staggered three-
year terms, with one class being elected each year. Our restated certificate of incorporation also provides that directors may be removed only for cause and then only by the
affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds or more of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of directors. Furthermore, any vacancy on our board of directors, however
occurring, including a vacancy resulting from an increase in the size of our board, may only be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of our directors then in office even if
less than a quorum.

No written consent of stockholders. Our restated certificate of incorporation provides that all stockholder actions are required to be taken by a vote of the stockholders
at an annual or special meeting, and that stockholders may not take any action by written consent in lieu of a meeting. This limit may lengthen the amount of time required to
take stockholder actions and would prevent the amendment of our bylaws or removal of directors by our stockholder without holding a meeting of stockholders.

Meetings of stockholders. Our bylaws provide that only a majority of the members of our board of directors then in office or stockholders holding at least one-quarter
of the voting power of all the then outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors may call special meetings of stockholders and
only those matters set forth in the notice of the special meeting may be considered or acted upon at a special meeting of stockholders. Our bylaws limit the business that may be
conducted at an annual meeting of stockholders to those matters properly brought before the meeting.

Advance notice requirements. Our bylaws establish advance notice procedures regarding stockholder proposals pertaining to the nomination of candidates for election
as directors or new business to be brought before meetings of our stockholders. These procedures provide that notice of stockholder proposals must be timely given in writing to
our corporate secretary prior to the meeting at which the action is to be taken. Generally, to be timely, notice must be received at our principal executive offices not less than 45
days or more than 75 days prior to the first anniversary date of the annual meeting for the preceding year. The notice must contain certain information specified in our bylaws.

Amendment  to  certificate  of  incorporation  and  bylaws.  As  required  by  the  Delaware  General  Corporation  Law,  any  amendment  of  our  restated  certificate  of
incorporation must first be approved by a majority of our board of directors, and if required by law or our restated certificate of incorporation, must thereafter be approved by a
majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the amendment, and a majority of the outstanding shares of each class entitled to vote thereon as a class, except that the
amendment of the provisions relating to stockholder action, directors, amending our bylaws, limitation of liability and the amendment of our restated certificate of incorporation
must be approved by not less than two-thirds of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the amendment, and a majority of the outstanding shares of each class entitled to vote
thereon as a class. Our bylaws may be amended by the affirmative vote of a majority vote of the directors then in office, subject to any limitations set forth in the bylaws; and
may also be amended by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the voting power of all the then outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote generally in the
election of directors, voting together as a single class.

7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
UNDER THE POLARITYTE, INC.
2020 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Exhibit 10.17

Name of Optionee:

No. of Option Shares:

Option Exercise Price per Share:

Grant Date:

Expiration Date:

$
[FMV on Grant Date]

[No more than 10 years]

Pursuant to the PolarityTE, Inc. 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan as amended through the date hereof (the “Plan”), PolarityTE, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
grants to the Optionee named above an option (the “Stock Option”) to purchase on or prior to the Expiration Date specified above all or part of the number of shares of Common
Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Stock”), of the Company specified above at the Option Exercise Price per Share specified above subject to the terms and conditions set
forth herein and in the Plan.

SECTION 1 .Exercisability Schedule. No portion of this Stock Option may be exercised until such portion shall have become exercisable. Except as set forth below,
and subject to the discretion of the Administrator (as defined in Section 2 of the Plan) to accelerate the exercisability schedule hereunder, this Stock Option shall be exercisable
with respect to the following number of Option Shares on the dates indicated so long as the Optionee remains an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary on such dates:

Incremental Number of
Option Shares Exercisable
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)

* Max. of $100,000 per yr.

Exercisability Date

Once exercisable, this Stock Option shall continue to be exercisable at any time or times prior to the close of business on the Expiration Date, subject to the provisions hereof
and of the Plan.

SECTION 2 .Manner of Exercise.

(a)       The Optionee may exercise this Stock Option only in the following manner: from time to time on or prior to the Expiration Date of this Stock Option, the
Optionee may give written notice to the Administrator of his or her election to purchase some or all of the Option Shares purchasable at the time of such notice. This notice shall
specify the number of Option Shares to be purchased.

Payment of the purchase price for the Option Shares may be made by one or more of the following methods: (i) in cash, by certified or bank check or other instrument
acceptable to the Administrator; (ii) through the delivery (or attestation to the ownership) of shares of Stock that have been purchased by the Optionee on the open market or
that  are  beneficially  owned  by  the  Optionee  and  are  not  then  subject  to  any  restrictions  under  any  Company  plan  and  that  otherwise  satisfy  any  holding  periods  as  may  be
required  by  the Administrator;  or  (iii)  by  the  Optionee  delivering  to  the  Company  a  properly  executed  exercise  notice  together  with  irrevocable  instructions  to  a  broker  to
promptly deliver to the Company cash or a check payable and acceptable to the Company to pay the option purchase price, provided that in the event the Optionee chooses to
pay the option purchase price as so provided, the Optionee and the broker shall comply with such procedures and enter into such agreements of indemnity and other agreements
as the Administrator shall prescribe as a condition of such payment procedure; or (iv) a combination of (i), (ii) and (iii) above. Payment instruments will be received subject to
collection.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The transfer to the Optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent of the Option Shares will be contingent upon (i) the Company’s receipt from the
Optionee  of  the  full  purchase  price  for  the  Option  Shares,  as  set  forth  above,  (ii)  the  fulfillment  of  any  other  requirements  contained  herein  or  in  the  Plan  or  in  any  other
agreement  or  provision  of  laws,  and  (iii)  the  receipt  by  the  Company  of  any  agreement,  statement  or  other  evidence  that  the  Company  may  require  to  satisfy  itself  that  the
issuance  of  Stock  to  be  purchased  pursuant  to  the  exercise  of  Stock  Options  under  the  Plan  and  any  subsequent  resale  of  the  shares  of  Stock  will  be  in  compliance  with
applicable laws and regulations. In the event the Optionee chooses to pay the purchase price by previously-owned shares of Stock through the attestation method, the number of
shares of Stock transferred to the Optionee upon the exercise of the Stock Option shall be net of the Shares attested to.

(b)       The shares of Stock purchased upon exercise of this Stock Option shall be transferred to the Optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent
upon compliance to the satisfaction of the Administrator with all requirements under applicable laws or regulations in connection with such transfer and with the requirements
hereof and of the Plan. The determination of the Administrator as to such compliance shall be final and binding on the Optionee. The Optionee shall not be deemed to be the
holder of, or to have any of the rights of a holder with respect to, any shares of Stock subject to this Stock Option unless and until this Stock Option shall have been exercised
pursuant  to  the  terms  hereof,  the  Company  or  the  transfer  agent  shall  have  transferred  the  shares  to  the  Optionee,  and  the  Optionee’s  name  shall  have  been  entered  as  the
stockholder of record on the books of the Company. Thereupon, the Optionee shall have full voting, dividend and other ownership rights with respect to such shares of Stock.

(c)       The minimum number of shares with respect to which this Stock Option may be exercised at any one time shall be 100 shares, unless the number of shares with

respect to which this Stock Option is being exercised is the total number of shares subject to exercise under this Stock Option at the time.

(d)       Notwithstanding any other provision hereof or of the Plan, no portion of this Stock Option shall be exercisable after the Expiration Date hereof.

SECTION 3. Termination of Service Relationship. If the Optionee’s Service Relationship by the Company or a Subsidiary (as defined in the Plan) is terminated, the

period within which to exercise the Stock Option may be subject to earlier termination as set forth below.

(a)       Termination Due to Death. If the Optionee’s Service Relationship terminates by reason of the Optionee’s death, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on
such date, to the extent exercisable on the date of death, may thereafter be exercised by the Optionee’s legal representative or legatee for a period of 12 months from the date of
death or until the Expiration Date, if earlier. Any portion of this Stock Option that is not exercisable on the date of death shall terminate immediately and be of no further force
or effect.

( b )       Termination Due to Disability. If the Optionee’s Service Relationship terminates by reason of the Optionee’s disability (as determined by the Administrator),
any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date, to the extent exercisable on the date of such termination of Service Relationship, may thereafter be exercised by the
Optionee for a period of 12 months from the date of disability or until the Expiration Date, if earlier. Any portion of this Stock Option that is not exercisable on the date of
disability shall terminate immediately and be of no further force or effect.

( c )       Termination for Cause. If the Optionee’s Service Relationship terminates for Cause, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date shall terminate
immediately  and  be  of  no  further  force  and  effect.  For  purposes  hereof,  “Cause”  shall  mean,  unless  otherwise  provided  in  an  employment  agreement  (or  similar  services
agreements) between the Company and the Optionee, a determination by the Administrator that the Optionee shall be dismissed as a result of (i) any material breach by the
Optionee of any agreement between the Optionee and the Company; (ii) the conviction of, indictment for or plea of nolo contendere by the Optionee to a felony or a crime
involving moral turpitude; or (iii) any material misconduct or willful and deliberate non-performance (other than by reason of disability) by the Optionee of the Optionee’s
duties to the Company.

( d )       Other Termination. If the Optionee’s Service Relationship terminates for any reason other than the Optionee’s death, the Optionee’s disability, or Cause, and
unless  otherwise  determined  by  the Administrator,  any  portion  of  this  Stock  Option  outstanding  on  such  date  may  be  exercised,  to  the  extent  exercisable  on  the  date  of
termination, for a period of three months from the date of termination or until the Expiration Date, if earlier. Any portion of this Stock Option that is not exercisable on the date
of termination shall terminate immediately and be of no further force or effect.

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Administrator’s  determination  of  the  reason  for  termination  of  the  Optionee’s  Service  Relationship  shall  be  conclusive  and  binding  on  the  Optionee  and  his  or  her
representatives or legatees.

SECTION 4. Incorporation of Plan. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Stock Option shall be subject to and governed by all the terms and conditions
of the Plan, including the powers of the Administrator set forth in Section 2(b) of the Plan. Capitalized terms in this Agreement shall have the meaning specified in the Plan,
unless a different meaning is specified herein.

SECTION 5. Transferability. This Agreement is personal to the Optionee, is non-assignable and is not transferable in any manner, by operation of law or otherwise,
other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. This Stock Option is exercisable, during the Optionee’s lifetime, only by the Optionee, and thereafter, only by the
Optionee’s legal representative or legatee.

SECTION 6. Status of the Stock Option. This Stock Option is intended to qualify as an “incentive stock option” under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the “Code”), but the Company does not represent or warrant that this Stock Option qualifies as such. The Optionee should consult with his or her own tax
advisors regarding the tax effects of this Stock Option and the requirements necessary to obtain favorable income tax treatment under Section 422 of the Code, including, but
not limited to, holding period requirements. To the extent any portion of this Stock Option does not so qualify as an “incentive stock option,” such portion shall be deemed to
be a non-qualified stock option. If the Optionee intends to dispose or does dispose (whether by sale, gift, transfer or otherwise) of any Option Shares within the one-year period
beginning on the date after the transfer of such shares to him or her, or within the two-year period beginning on the day after the grant of this Stock Option, he or she will so
notify the Company within 30 days after such disposition.

SECTION 7. Tax Withholding. The Optionee shall, not later than the date as of which the exercise of this Stock Option becomes a taxable event for Federal income tax
purposes, pay to the Company or make arrangements satisfactory to the Administrator for payment of any Federal, state, and local taxes required by law to be withheld on
account of such taxable event. The Company shall have the authority to cause the required tax withholding obligation to be satisfied, in whole or in part, by withholding from
shares  of  Stock  to  be  issued  to  the  Optionee  a  number  of  shares  of  Stock  with  an  aggregate  Fair  Market  Value  that  would  satisfy  the  withholding  amount  due;  provided,
however, that the amount withheld does not exceed the maximum statutory tax rate or such lesser amount as is necessary to avoid adverse accounting treatment or as determined
by the Administrator.

SECTION 8. No Obligation to Continue Service Relationship. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is obligated by or as a result of the Plan or this Agreement to
continue the Optionee’s Service Relationship and neither the Plan nor this Agreement shall interfere in any way with the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate the
Service Relationship of the Optionee at any time.

SECTION 9. Integration. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this Stock Option and supersedes all prior agreements

and discussions between the parties concerning such subject matter.

SECTION  10. Data  Privacy  Consent.  In  order  to  administer  the  Plan  and  this Agreement  and  to  implement  or  structure  future  equity  grants,  the  Company,  its
subsidiaries and affiliates and certain agents thereof (together, the “Relevant Companies”) may process any and all personal or professional data, including but not limited to
Social Security or other identification number, home address and telephone number, date of birth and other information that is necessary or desirable for the administration of
the Plan or this Agreement (the “Relevant Information”). By entering into this Agreement, the Optionee (i) authorizes the Company to collect, process, register and transfer to
the Relevant Companies all Relevant Information; (ii) waives any privacy rights the Optionee may have with respect to the Relevant Information; (iii) authorizes the Relevant
Companies  to  store  and  transmit  such  information  in  electronic  form;  and  (iv)  authorizes  the  transfer  of  the  Relevant  Information  to  any  jurisdiction  in  which  the  Relevant
Companies consider appropriate. The Optionee shall have access to, and the right to change, the Relevant Information. Relevant Information will only be used in accordance
with applicable law.

SECTION  11. Notices.  Notices  hereunder  shall  be  mailed  or  delivered  to  the  Company  at  its  principal  place  of  business  and  shall  be  mailed  or  delivered  to  the

Optionee at the address on file with the Company or, in either case, at such other address as one party may subsequently furnish to the other party in writing.

POLARITYTE, INC.

By:
Name:
Title:

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                
 
 
 
The foregoing Agreement is hereby accepted, and the terms and conditions thereof hereby agreed to by the undersigned. Electronic acceptance of this Agreement pursuant to the
Company’s instructions to the Grantee (including through an online acceptance process) is acceptable.

Dated:

Grantee’s Signature

Grantee’s Name and address: 

4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
UNDER THE POLARITYTE, INC.
2020 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Exhibit 10.18

Name of Optionee:

No. of Option Shares:

Option Exercise Price per Share:

Grant Date:

Expiration Date:

$
[FMV on Grant Date]

[No more than 10 years]

Pursuant to the PolarityTE, Inc. 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan as amended through the date hereof (the “Plan”), PolarityTE, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
grants to the Optionee named above, who is a Director of the Company but is not an employee of the Company, an option (the “Stock Option”) to purchase on or prior to the
Expiration Date specified above all or part of the number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Stock”), of the Company specified above at the Option
Exercise Price per Share specified above subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan. This Stock Option is not intended to be an “incentive stock option”
under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

SECTION 1. Exercisability Schedule. No portion of this Stock Option may be exercised until such portion shall have become exercisable. Except as set forth below,
and subject to the discretion of the Administrator (as defined in Section 2 of the Plan) to accelerate the exercisability schedule hereunder, this Stock Option shall be exercisable
with respect to the following number of Option Shares on the dates indicated so long as the Optionee remains in service as a member of the Board on such dates:

Incremental Number of
Option Shares Exercisable
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)

Exercisability Date

Once exercisable, this Stock Option shall continue to be exercisable at any time or times prior to the close of business on the Expiration Date, subject to the provisions hereof
and of the Plan.

SECTION 2. Manner of Exercise.

(a) The Optionee may exercise this Stock Option only in the following manner: from time to time on or prior to the Expiration Date of this Stock Option, the Optionee
may give written notice to the Administrator of his or her election to purchase some or all of the Option Shares purchasable at the time of such notice. This notice shall specify
the number of Option Shares to be purchased.

Payment of the purchase price for the Option Shares may be made by one or more of the following methods: (i) in cash, by certified or bank check or other instrument
acceptable to the Administrator; (ii) through the delivery (or attestation to the ownership) of shares of Stock that have been purchased by the Optionee on the open market or
that  are  beneficially  owned  by  the  Optionee  and  are  not  then  subject  to  any  restrictions  under  any  Company  plan  and  that  otherwise  satisfy  any  holding  periods  as  may  be
required by the Administrator; (iii) by the Optionee delivering to the Company a properly executed exercise notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to promptly
deliver to the Company cash or a check payable and acceptable to the Company to pay the option purchase price, provided that in the event the Optionee chooses to pay the
option purchase price as so provided, the Optionee and the broker shall comply with such procedures and enter into such agreements of indemnity and other agreements as the
Administrator shall prescribe as a condition of such payment procedure; (iv) by a “net exercise” arrangement pursuant to which the Company will reduce the number of shares
of Stock issuable upon exercise by the largest whole number of shares with a Fair Market Value that does not exceed the aggregate exercise price; or (v) a combination of (i),
(ii), (iii) and (iv) above. Payment instruments will be received subject to collection.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The transfer to the Optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent of the Option Shares will be contingent upon (i) the Company’s receipt from the
Optionee  of  the  full  purchase  price  for  the  Option  Shares,  as  set  forth  above,  (ii)  the  fulfillment  of  any  other  requirements  contained  herein  or  in  the  Plan  or  in  any  other
agreement  or  provision  of  laws,  and  (iii)  the  receipt  by  the  Company  of  any  agreement,  statement  or  other  evidence  that  the  Company  may  require  to  satisfy  itself  that  the
issuance  of  Stock  to  be  purchased  pursuant  to  the  exercise  of  Stock  Options  under  the  Plan  and  any  subsequent  resale  of  the  shares  of  Stock  will  be  in  compliance  with
applicable laws and regulations. In the event the Optionee chooses to pay the purchase price by previously-owned shares of Stock through the attestation method, the number of
shares of Stock transferred to the Optionee upon the exercise of the Stock Option shall be net of the Shares attested to.

(b) The shares of Stock purchased upon exercise of this Stock Option shall be transferred to the Optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent upon
compliance to the satisfaction of the Administrator with all requirements under applicable laws or regulations in connection with such transfer and with the requirements hereof
and of the Plan. The determination of the Administrator as to such compliance shall be final and binding on the Optionee. The Optionee shall not be deemed to be the holder of,
or to have any of the rights of a holder with respect to, any shares of Stock subject to this Stock Option unless and until this Stock Option shall have been exercised pursuant to
the terms hereof, the Company or the transfer agent shall have transferred the shares to the Optionee, and the Optionee’s name shall have been entered as the stockholder of
record on the books of the Company. Thereupon, the Optionee shall have full voting, dividend and other ownership rights with respect to such shares of Stock.

(c) The minimum number of shares with respect to which this Stock Option may be exercised at any one time shall be 100 shares, unless the number of shares with

respect to which this Stock Option is being exercised is the total number of shares subject to exercise under this Stock Option at the time.

(d) Notwithstanding any other provision hereof or of the Plan, no portion of this Stock Option shall be exercisable after the Expiration Date hereof.

SECTION 3. Termination as Director. If the Optionee ceases to be a Director of the Company, the period within which to exercise the Stock Option may be subject to

earlier termination as set forth below.

(a) Termination Due to Death. If the Optionee’s service as a Director terminates by reason of the Optionee’s death, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on
such date, to the extent exercisable on the date of death, may thereafter be exercised by the Optionee’s legal representative or legatee for a period of 12 months from the date of
death or until the Expiration Date, if earlier. Any portion of this Stock Option that is not exercisable on the date of death shall terminate immediately and be of no further force
or effect.

(b) Other Termination. If the Optionee ceases to be a Director for any reason other than the Optionee’s death, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date
may be exercised, to the extent exercisable on the date the Optionee ceased to be a Director, for a period of six months from the date the Optionee ceased to be a Director or
until the Expiration Date, if earlier. Any portion of this Stock Option that is not exercisable on the date the Optionee ceases to be a Director shall terminate immediately and be
of no further force or effect.

SECTION 4. Incorporation of Plan. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Stock Option shall be subject to and governed by all the terms and conditions
of the Plan, including the powers of the Administrator set forth in Section 2(b) of the Plan. Capitalized terms in this Agreement shall have the meaning specified in the Plan,
unless a different meaning is specified herein.

SECTION 5. Transferability. This Agreement is personal to the Optionee, is non-assignable and is not transferable in any manner, by operation of law or otherwise,
other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. This Stock Option is exercisable, during the Optionee’s lifetime, only by the Optionee, and thereafter, only by the
Optionee’s legal representative or legatee.

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SECTION 6. No Obligation to Continue as a Director. Neither the Plan nor this Stock Option confers upon the Optionee any rights with respect to continuance as a

Director.

SECTION 7. Integration. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this Stock Option and supersedes all prior agreements

and discussions between the parties concerning such subject matter.

SECTION  8. Data  Privacy  Consent.  In  order  to  administer  the  Plan  and  this  Agreement  and  to  implement  or  structure  future  equity  grants,  the  Company,  its
subsidiaries and affiliates and certain agents thereof (together, the “Relevant Companies”) may process any and all personal or professional data, including but not limited to
Social Security or other identification number, home address and telephone number, date of birth and other information that is necessary or desirable for the administration of
the Plan or this Agreement (the “Relevant Information”). By entering into this Agreement, the Optionee (i) authorizes the Company to collect, process, register and transfer to
the Relevant Companies all Relevant Information; (ii) waives any privacy rights the Optionee may have with respect to the Relevant Information; (iii) authorizes the Relevant
Companies  to  store  and  transmit  such  information  in  electronic  form;  and  (iv)  authorizes  the  transfer  of  the  Relevant  Information  to  any  jurisdiction  in  which  the  Relevant
Companies consider appropriate. The Optionee shall have access to, and the right to change, the Relevant Information. Relevant Information will only be used in accordance
with applicable law.

SECTION 9. Notices. Notices hereunder shall be mailed or delivered to the Company at its principal place of business and shall be mailed or delivered to the Optionee

at the address on file with the Company or, in either case, at such other address as one party may subsequently furnish to the other party in writing.

POLARITYTE, INC.

By:
Name:
Title:

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
 
The foregoing Agreement is hereby accepted, and the terms and conditions thereof hereby agreed to by the undersigned. Electronic acceptance of this Agreement pursuant to the
Company’s instructions to the Grantee (including through an online acceptance process) is acceptable.

Dated:

Grantee’s Signature

Grantee’s Name and address:

4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
FOR COMPANY EMPLOYEES
UNDER THE POLARITYTE, INC.
2020 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Exhibit 10.19

Name of Optionee:

No. of Option Shares:

Option Exercise Price per Share:

Grant Date:

Expiration Date:

$
[FMV on Grant Date]

[No more than 10 years]

Pursuant to the PolarityTE, Inc. 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan as amended through the date hereof (the “Plan”), PolarityTE, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
grants to the Optionee named above an option (the “Stock Option”) to purchase on or prior to the Expiration Date specified above all or part of the number of shares of Common
Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Stock”) of the Company specified above at the Option Exercise Price per Share specified above subject to the terms and conditions set
forth herein and in the Plan. This Stock Option is not intended to be an “incentive stock option” under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

SECTION 1. Exercisability Schedule. No portion of this Stock Option may be exercised until such portion shall have become exercisable. Except as set forth below,
and subject to the discretion of the Administrator (as defined in Section 2 of the Plan) to accelerate the exercisability schedule hereunder, this Stock Option shall be exercisable
with respect to the following number of Option Shares on the dates indicated so long as Optionee continues to have a Service Relationship with the Company or a Subsidiary on
such dates:

Incremental Number of
Option Shares Exercisable
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)

Exercisability Date

Once exercisable, this Stock Option shall continue to be exercisable at any time or times prior to the close of business on the Expiration Date, subject to the provisions hereof
and of the Plan.

SECTION 2. Manner of Exercise.

(a)       The Optionee may exercise this Stock Option only in the following manner: from time to time on or prior to the Expiration Date of this Stock Option, the
Optionee may give written notice to the Administrator of his or her election to purchase some or all of the Option Shares purchasable at the time of such notice. This notice shall
specify the number of Option Shares to be purchased.

Payment of the purchase price for the Option Shares may be made by one or more of the following methods: (i) in cash, by certified or bank check or other instrument
acceptable to the Administrator; (ii) through the delivery (or attestation to the ownership) of shares of Stock that have been purchased by the Optionee on the open market or
that  are  beneficially  owned  by  the  Optionee  and  are  not  then  subject  to  any  restrictions  under  any  Company  plan  and  that  otherwise  satisfy  any  holding  periods  as  may  be
required by the Administrator; (iii) by the Optionee delivering to the Company a properly executed exercise notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to promptly
deliver to the Company cash or a check payable and acceptable to the Company to pay the option purchase price, provided that in the event the Optionee chooses to pay the
option purchase price as so provided, the Optionee and the broker shall comply with such procedures and enter into such agreements of indemnity and other agreements as the
Administrator shall prescribe as a condition of such payment procedure; (iv) by a “net exercise” arrangement pursuant to which the Company will reduce the number of shares
of Stock issuable upon exercise by the largest whole number of shares with a Fair Market Value that does not exceed the aggregate exercise price; or (v) a combination of (i),
(ii), (iii) and (iv) above. Payment instruments will be received subject to collection.

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The transfer to the Optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent of the Option Shares will be contingent upon (i) the Company’s receipt from the
Optionee  of  the  full  purchase  price  for  the  Option  Shares,  as  set  forth  above,  (ii)  the  fulfillment  of  any  other  requirements  contained  herein  or  in  the  Plan  or  in  any  other
agreement  or  provision  of  laws,  and  (iii)  the  receipt  by  the  Company  of  any  agreement,  statement  or  other  evidence  that  the  Company  may  require  to  satisfy  itself  that  the
issuance  of  Stock  to  be  purchased  pursuant  to  the  exercise  of  Stock  Options  under  the  Plan  and  any  subsequent  resale  of  the  shares  of  Stock  will  be  in  compliance  with
applicable laws and regulations. In the event the Optionee chooses to pay the purchase price by previously-owned shares of Stock through the attestation method, the number of
shares of Stock transferred to the Optionee upon the exercise of the Stock Option shall be net of the Shares attested to.

(b)       The shares of Stock purchased upon exercise of this Stock Option shall be transferred to the Optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent
upon compliance to the satisfaction of the Administrator with all requirements under applicable laws or regulations in connection with such transfer and with the requirements
hereof and of the Plan. The determination of the Administrator as to such compliance shall be final and binding on the Optionee. The Optionee shall not be deemed to be the
holder of, or to have any of the rights of a holder with respect to, any shares of Stock subject to this Stock Option unless and until this Stock Option shall have been exercised
pursuant  to  the  terms  hereof,  the  Company  or  the  transfer  agent  shall  have  transferred  the  shares  to  the  Optionee,  and  the  Optionee’s  name  shall  have  been  entered  as  the
stockholder of record on the books of the Company. Thereupon, the Optionee shall have full voting, dividend and other ownership rights with respect to such shares of Stock.

(c)       The minimum number of shares with respect to which this Stock Option may be exercised at any one time shall be 100 shares, unless the number of shares with

respect to which this Stock Option is being exercised is the total number of shares subject to exercise under this Stock Option at the time.

(d)       Notwithstanding any other provision hereof or of the Plan, no portion of this Stock Option shall be exercisable after the Expiration Date hereof.

SECTION 3. Termination of Service Relationship. If the Optionee’s Service Relationship by the Company or a Subsidiary (as defined in the Plan) is terminated, the

period within which to exercise the Stock Option may be subject to earlier termination as set forth below.

(a)       Termination Due to Death. If the Optionee’s Service Relationship terminates by reason of the Optionee’s death, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on
such date, to the extent exercisable on the date of death, may thereafter be exercised by the Optionee’s legal representative or legatee for a period of 12 months from the date of
death or until the Expiration Date, if earlier. Any portion of this Stock Option that is not exercisable on the date of death shall terminate immediately and be of no further force
or effect.

( b )       Termination Due to Disability. If the Optionee’s Service Relationship terminates by reason of the Optionee’s disability (as determined by the Administrator),
any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date, to the extent exercisable on the date of such termination of Service Relationship, may thereafter be exercised by the
Optionee for a period of 12 months from the date of disability or until the Expiration Date, if earlier. Any portion of this Stock Option that is not exercisable on the date of
disability shall terminate immediately and be of no further force or effect.

( c )       Termination for Cause. If the Optionee’s Service Relationship terminates for Cause, any portion of this Stock Option outstanding on such date shall terminate
immediately  and  be  of  no  further  force  and  effect.  For  purposes  hereof,  “Cause”  shall  mean,  unless  otherwise  provided  in  an  employment  agreement  (or  similar  services
agreements) between the Company and the Optionee, a determination by the Administrator that the Optionee shall be dismissed as a result of (i) any material breach by the
Optionee of any agreement between the Optionee and the Company; (ii) the conviction of, indictment for or plea of nolo contendere by the Optionee to a felony or a crime
involving moral turpitude; or (iii) any material misconduct or willful and deliberate non-performance (other than by reason of disability) by the Optionee of the Optionee’s
duties to the Company.

( d )       Other Termination. If the Optionee’s Service Relationship terminates for any reason other than the Optionee’s death, the Optionee’s disability or Cause, and
unless  otherwise  determined  by  the Administrator,  any  portion  of  this  Stock  Option  outstanding  on  such  date  may  be  exercised,  to  the  extent  exercisable  on  the  date  of
termination, for a period of three months from the date of termination or until the Expiration Date, if earlier. Any portion of this Stock Option that is not exercisable on the date
of termination shall terminate immediately and be of no further force or effect.

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Administrator’s  determination  of  the  reason  for  termination  of  the  Optionee’s  Service  Relationship  shall  be  conclusive  and  binding  on  the  Optionee  and  his  or  her
representatives or legatees.

SECTION 4. Incorporation of Plan. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Stock Option shall be subject to and governed by all the terms and conditions
of the Plan, including the powers of the Administrator set forth in Section 2(b) of the Plan. Capitalized terms in this Agreement shall have the meaning specified in the Plan,
unless a different meaning is specified herein.

SECTION 5. Transferability. This Agreement is personal to the Optionee, is non-assignable and is not transferable in any manner, by operation of law or otherwise,
other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. This Stock Option is exercisable, during the Optionee’s lifetime, only by the Optionee, and thereafter, only by the
Optionee’s legal representative or legatee.

SECTION 6. Tax Withholding. The Optionee shall, not later than the date as of which the exercise of this Stock Option becomes a taxable event for Federal income tax
purposes, pay to the Company or make arrangements satisfactory to the Administrator for payment of any Federal, state, and local taxes required by law to be withheld on
account of such taxable event. The Company shall have the authority to cause the required tax withholding obligation to be satisfied, in whole or in part, by withholding from
shares  of  Stock  to  be  issued  to  the  Optionee  a  number  of  shares  of  Stock  with  an  aggregate  Fair  Market  Value  that  would  satisfy  the  withholding  amount  due;  provided,
however, that the amount withheld does not exceed the maximum statutory tax rate or such lesser amount as is necessary to avoid adverse accounting treatment or as determined
by the Administrator.

SECTION 7. No Obligation to Continue Service Relationship. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is obligated by or as a result of the Plan or this Agreement to
continue the Optionee’s Service Relationship and neither the Plan nor this Agreement shall interfere in any way with the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate the
Service Relationship of the Optionee at any time.

SECTION 8. Integration. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this Stock Option and supersedes all prior agreements

and discussions between the parties concerning such subject matter.

SECTION  9. Data  Privacy  Consent.  In  order  to  administer  the  Plan  and  this  Agreement  and  to  implement  or  structure  future  equity  grants,  the  Company,  its
subsidiaries and affiliates and certain agents thereof (together, the “Relevant Companies”) may process any and all personal or professional data, including but not limited to
Social Security or other identification number, home address and telephone number, date of birth and other information that is necessary or desirable for the administration of
the Plan or this Agreement (the “Relevant Information”). By entering into this Agreement, the Optionee (i) authorizes the Company to collect, process, register and transfer to
the Relevant Companies all Relevant Information; (ii) waives any privacy rights the Optionee may have with respect to the Relevant Information; (iii) authorizes the Relevant
Companies  to  store  and  transmit  such  information  in  electronic  form;  and  (iv)  authorizes  the  transfer  of  the  Relevant  Information  to  any  jurisdiction  in  which  the  Relevant
Companies consider appropriate. The Optionee shall have access to, and the right to change, the Relevant Information. Relevant Information will only be used in accordance
with applicable law.

4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SECTION  10. Notices.  Notices  hereunder  shall  be  mailed  or  delivered  to  the  Company  at  its  principal  place  of  business  and  shall  be  mailed  or  delivered  to  the

Optionee at the address on file with the Company or, in either case, at such other address as one party may subsequently furnish to the other party in writing.

POLARITYTE, INC.

By:
Name:
Title:

5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
 
 
 
The foregoing Agreement is hereby accepted, and the terms and conditions thereof hereby agreed to by the undersigned. Electronic acceptance of this Agreement pursuant to the
Company’s instructions to the Grantee (including through an online acceptance process) is acceptable.

Dated:

  Grantee’s Signature

  Grantee’s Name and address:

6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE CONSULTANTS
UNDER THE POLARITYTE, INC.
2020 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Exhibit 10.20

Name of Optionee:

No. of Option Shares:

Option Exercise Price per Share:

Grant Date:

Expiration Date:

$
[FMV on Grant Date]

[No more than 10 years]

Pursuant to the PolarityTE, Inc. 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan as amended through the date hereof (the “Plan”), PolarityTE, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
grants to the Optionee named above, who is a Consultant of the Company, an option (the “Stock Option”) to purchase on or prior to the Expiration Date specified above all or
part of the number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Stock”), of the Company specified above at the Option Exercise Price per Share specified
above subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan. This Stock Option is not intended to be an “incentive stock option” under Section 422 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

SECTION 1. Exercisability Schedule. No portion of this Stock Option may be exercised until such portion shall have become exercisable. Except as set forth below,
and subject to the discretion of the Administrator (as defined in Section 2 of the Plan) to accelerate the exercisability schedule hereunder, this Stock Option shall be exercisable
with respect to the following number of Option Shares on the dates indicated so long as the Optionee remains in service to the Company or a Subsidiary as a Consultant on such
dates:

Incremental Number of
Option Shares Exercisable
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)

Exercisability Date

Once exercisable, this Stock Option shall continue to be exercisable at any time or times prior to the close of business on the Expiration Date, subject to the provisions hereof
and of the Plan.

SECTION 2. Manner of Exercise.

(a) The Optionee may exercise this Stock Option only in the following manner: from time to time on or prior to the Expiration Date of this Stock Option, the Optionee
may give written notice to the Administrator of his or her election to purchase some or all of the Option Shares purchasable at the time of such notice. This notice shall specify
the number of Option Shares to be purchased.

Payment of the purchase price for the Option Shares may be made by one or more of the following methods: (i) in cash, by certified or bank check or other instrument
acceptable to the Administrator; (ii) through the delivery (or attestation to the ownership) of shares of Stock that have been purchased by the Optionee on the open market or
that  are  beneficially  owned  by  the  Optionee  and  are  not  then  subject  to  any  restrictions  under  any  Company  plan  and  that  otherwise  satisfy  any  holding  periods  as  may  be
required by the Administrator; (iii) by the Optionee delivering to the Company a properly executed exercise notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to promptly
deliver to the Company cash or a check payable and acceptable to the Company to pay the option purchase price, provided that in the event the Optionee chooses to pay the
option purchase price as so provided, the Optionee and the broker shall comply with such procedures and enter into such agreements of indemnity and other agreements as the
Administrator shall prescribe as a condition of such payment procedure; (iv) by a “net exercise” arrangement pursuant to which the Company will reduce the number of shares
of Stock issuable upon exercise by the largest whole number of shares with a Fair Market Value that does not exceed the aggregate exercise price; or (v) a combination of (i),
(ii), (iii) and (iv) above. Payment instruments will be received subject to collection.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The transfer to the Optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent of the Option Shares will be contingent upon (i) the Company’s receipt from the
Optionee  of  the  full  purchase  price  for  the  Option  Shares,  as  set  forth  above,  (ii)  the  fulfillment  of  any  other  requirements  contained  herein  or  in  the  Plan  or  in  any  other
agreement  or  provision  of  laws,  and  (iii)  the  receipt  by  the  Company  of  any  agreement,  statement  or  other  evidence  that  the  Company  may  require  to  satisfy  itself  that  the
issuance  of  Stock  to  be  purchased  pursuant  to  the  exercise  of  Stock  Options  under  the  Plan  and  any  subsequent  resale  of  the  shares  of  Stock  will  be  in  compliance  with
applicable laws and regulations. In the event the Optionee chooses to pay the purchase price by previously-owned shares of Stock through the attestation method, the number of
shares of Stock transferred to the Optionee upon the exercise of the Stock Option shall be net of the Shares attested to.

(b) The shares of Stock purchased upon exercise of this Stock Option shall be transferred to the Optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent upon
compliance to the satisfaction of the Administrator with all requirements under applicable laws or regulations in connection with such transfer and with the requirements hereof
and of the Plan. The determination of the Administrator as to such compliance shall be final and binding on the Optionee. The Optionee shall not be deemed to be the holder of,
or to have any of the rights of a holder with respect to, any shares of Stock subject to this Stock Option unless and until this Stock Option shall have been exercised pursuant to
the terms hereof, the Company or the transfer agent shall have transferred the shares to the Optionee, and the Optionee’s name shall have been entered as the stockholder of
record on the books of the Company. Thereupon, the Optionee shall have full voting, dividend and other ownership rights with respect to such shares of Stock.

(c) The minimum number of shares with respect to which this Stock Option may be exercised at any one time shall be 100 shares, unless the number of shares with

respect to which this Stock Option is being exercised is the total number of shares subject to exercise under this Stock Option at the time.

(d) Notwithstanding any other provision hereof or of the Plan, no portion of this Stock Option shall be exercisable after the Expiration Date hereof.

SECTION 3. Termination of Service Relationship. If the Optionee ceases to have a Service Relationship with the Company or a Subsidiary for any reason, any portion
of this Stock Option outstanding on such date may be exercised, to the extent exercisable on the date the Optionee ceased to provide services, for a period of three months from
the date the Optionee ceased to provide services or until the Expiration Date, if earlier. Any portion of this Stock Option that is not exercisable on the date the Optionee ceases
to have a Service Relationship with the Company or a Subsidiary shall terminate immediately and be of no further force or effect.

SECTION 4. Incorporation of Plan. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Stock Option shall be subject to and governed by all the terms and conditions
of the Plan, including the powers of the Administrator set forth in Section 2(b) of the Plan. Capitalized terms in this Agreement shall have the meaning specified in the Plan,
unless a different meaning is specified herein.

SECTION 5. Transferability. This Agreement is personal to the Optionee, is non-assignable and is not transferable in any manner, by operation of law or otherwise,
other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. This Stock Option is exercisable, during the Optionee’s lifetime, only by the Optionee, and thereafter, only by the
Optionee’s legal representative or legatee.

SECTION  6. No  Obligation  to  Continue  Service  Relationship.  Neither  the  Plan  nor  this  Stock  Option  confers  upon  the  Optionee  any  rights  with  respect  to  the

continuance of Optionee’s Service Relationship with the Company or a Subsidiary.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SECTION 7. Integration. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this Stock Option and supersedes all prior agreements

and discussions between the parties concerning such subject matter.

SECTION  8. Data  Privacy  Consent.  In  order  to  administer  the  Plan  and  this  Agreement  and  to  implement  or  structure  future  equity  grants,  the  Company,  its
subsidiaries and affiliates and certain agents thereof (together, the “Relevant Companies”) may process any and all personal or professional data, including but not limited to
Social Security or other identification number, home address and telephone number, date of birth and other information that is necessary or desirable for the administration of
the Plan or this Agreement (the “Relevant Information”). By entering into this Agreement, the Optionee (i) authorizes the Company to collect, process, register and transfer to
the Relevant Companies all Relevant Information; (ii) waives any privacy rights the Optionee may have with respect to the Relevant Information; (iii) authorizes the Relevant
Companies  to  store  and  transmit  such  information  in  electronic  form;  and  (iv)  authorizes  the  transfer  of  the  Relevant  Information  to  any  jurisdiction  in  which  the  Relevant
Companies consider appropriate. The Optionee shall have access to, and the right to change, the Relevant Information. Relevant Information will only be used in accordance
with applicable law.

SECTION 9. Notices. Notices hereunder shall be mailed or delivered to the Company at its principal place of business and shall be mailed or delivered to the Optionee

at the address on file with the Company or, in either case, at such other address as one party may subsequently furnish to the other party in writing.

POLARITYTE, INC.

By:
Name:
Title:

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
 
 
 
The foregoing Agreement is hereby accepted, and the terms and conditions thereof hereby agreed to by the undersigned. Electronic acceptance of this Agreement pursuant to the
Company’s instructions to the Grantee (including through an online acceptance process) is acceptable.

Dated:

Grantee’s Signature

Grantee’s Name and address:

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
UNDER THE POLARITYTE, INC.
2020 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Exhibit 10.21

Name of Optionee:

No. of Restricted Stock Shares:

Grant Date:

Pursuant to the PolarityTE, Inc. 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan as amended through the date hereof (the “Plan”), PolarityTE, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
grants a Restricted Stock Award (an “Award”) to the Grantee named above. Upon acceptance of this Award, the Grantee shall receive the number of shares of Common Stock,
par value $0.001 per share (the “Stock”) of the Company specified above, subject to the restrictions and conditions set forth herein and in the Plan. The Company acknowledges
the receipt from the Grantee of consideration with respect to the par value of the Stock in the form of cash, past or future services rendered to the Company by the Grantee or
such other form of consideration as is acceptable to the Administrator.

SECTION  1. Award.  The  shares  of  Restricted  Stock  awarded  hereunder  shall  be  issued  and  held  by  the  Company’s  transfer  agent  in  book  entry  form,  and  the
Grantee’s name shall be entered as the stockholder of record on the books of the Company. Thereupon, the Grantee shall have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to such
shares, including voting and dividend rights, subject, however, to the restrictions and conditions specified in Paragraph 2 below. The Grantee shall (i) sign and deliver to the
Company a copy of this Award Agreement and (ii) deliver to the Company a stock power endorsed in blank.

SECTION 2. Restrictions and Conditions.

(a) Any book entries for the shares of Restricted Stock granted herein shall bear an appropriate legend, as determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion, to the

effect that such shares are subject to restrictions as set forth herein and in the Plan.

(b) Shares of Restricted Stock granted herein may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of by the Grantee prior to vesting.

(c)  If  the  Grantee’s  Service  Relationship  with  the  Company  and  its  Subsidiaries  is  voluntarily  or  involuntarily  terminated  for  any  reason  (including  death)  prior  to

vesting of shares of Restricted Stock granted herein, all shares of Restricted Stock shall immediately and automatically be forfeited and returned to the Company.

SECTION 3. Vesting of Restricted Stock. The restrictions and conditions in Paragraph 2 of this Agreement shall lapse on the Vesting Date or Dates specified in the
following schedule so long as the Grantee continues to have a Service Relationship with the Company or a Subsidiary on such Dates. If a series of Vesting Dates is specified,
then the restrictions and conditions in Paragraph 2 shall lapse only with respect to the number of shares of Restricted Stock specified as vested on such date.

Incremental Number
of Shares Vested
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)

Vesting Date

Subsequent  to  such  Vesting  Date  or  Dates,  the  shares  of  Stock  on  which  all  restrictions  and  conditions  have  lapsed  shall  no  longer  be  deemed  Restricted  Stock.  The
Administrator may at any time accelerate the vesting schedule specified in this Paragraph 3.

SECTION 4. Dividends. Dividends on shares of Restricted Stock shall be paid currently to the Grantee.

SECTION 5. Incorporation of Plan. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Award shall be subject to and governed by all the terms and conditions of the
Plan, including the powers of the Administrator set forth in Section 2(b) of the Plan. Capitalized terms in this Agreement shall have the meaning specified in the Plan, unless a
different meaning is specified herein.

SECTION  6. Transferability. This Agreement is personal to the Grantee, is non-assignable and is not transferable in any manner, by operation of law or otherwise,

other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

SECTION  7. Tax Withholding .  The  Grantee  shall,  not  later  than  the  date  as  of  which  the  receipt  of  this Award  becomes  a  taxable  event  for  Federal  income  tax
purposes, pay to the Company or make arrangements satisfactory to the Administrator for payment of any Federal, state, and local taxes required by law to be withheld on
account of such taxable event. Except in the case where an election is made pursuant to Paragraph 8 below, the Company shall have the authority to cause the required tax
withholding obligation to be satisfied, in whole or in part, by withholding from shares of Stock to be issued or released by the transfer agent a number of shares of Stock with an
aggregate Fair Market Value that would satisfy the withholding amount due; provided, however, that the amount withheld does not exceed the maximum statutory tax rate or
such lesser amount as is necessary to avoid adverse accounting treatment or as determined by the Administrator.

SECTION 8. Election Under Section 83(b). The Grantee and the Company hereby agree that the Grantee may, within 30 days following the Grant Date of this Award,
file with the Internal Revenue Service and the Company an election under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. In the event the Grantee makes such an election, he or
she agrees to provide a copy of the election to the Company. The Grantee acknowledges that he or she is responsible for obtaining the advice of his or her tax advisors with
regard to the Section 83(b) election and that he or she is relying solely on such advisors and not on any statements or representations of the Company or any of its agents with
regard to such election.

SECTION 9. No Obligation to Continue Service Relationship. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is obligated by or as a result of the Plan or this Agreement to
continue the Grantee in the Service Relationship and neither the Plan nor this Agreement shall interfere in any way with the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate
the Service Relationship of the Grantee at any time.

SECTION  10. Integration. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this Award and supersedes all prior agreements and

discussions between the parties concerning such subject matter.

SECTION  11. Data  Privacy  Consent.  In  order  to  administer  the  Plan  and  this Agreement  and  to  implement  or  structure  future  equity  grants,  the  Company,  its
subsidiaries and affiliates and certain agents thereof (together, the “Relevant Companies”) may process any and all personal or professional data, including but not limited to
Social Security or other identification number, home address and telephone number, date of birth and other information that is necessary or desirable for the administration of

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
the Plan or this Agreement (the “Relevant Information”). By entering into this Agreement, the Grantee (i) authorizes the Company to collect, process, register and transfer to the
Relevant  Companies  all  Relevant  Information;  (ii)  waives  any  privacy  rights  the  Grantee  may  have  with  respect  to  the  Relevant  Information;  (iii)  authorizes  the  Relevant
Companies  to  store  and  transmit  such  information  in  electronic  form;  and  (iv)  authorizes  the  transfer  of  the  Relevant  Information  to  any  jurisdiction  in  which  the  Relevant
Companies consider appropriate. The Grantee shall have access to, and the right to change, the Relevant Information. Relevant Information will only be used in accordance with
applicable law.

SECTION 12. Notices. Notices hereunder shall be mailed or delivered to the Company at its principal place of business and shall be mailed or delivered to the Grantee

at the address on file with the Company or, in either case, at such other address as one party may subsequently furnish to the other party in writing.

2

 
 
 
 
POLARITYTE, INC.

By:
Name:
Title:

The foregoing Agreement is hereby accepted, and the terms and conditions thereof hereby agreed to by the undersigned. Electronic acceptance of this Agreement pursuant to the
Company’s instructions to the Grantee (including through an online acceptance process) is acceptable.

Dated:

Grantee’s Signature

Grantee’s Name and address:

3

 
 
 
 
 
                
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
UNDER THE POLARITYTE, INC.
2020 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Exhibit 10.22

Name of Optionee:

No. of Restricted Stock Units:

Grant Date:

Pursuant to the PolarityTE, Inc. 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan as amended through the date hereof (the “Plan”), PolarityTE, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
grants  an  award  of  the  number  of  Restricted  Stock  Units  listed  above  (an  “Award”)  to  the  Grantee  named  above.  Each  Restricted  Stock  Unit  shall  relate  to  one  share  of
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Stock”) of the Company.

SECTION 1. Restrictions on Transfer of Award. This Award may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise encumbered or disposed of by the Grantee,
and any shares of Stock issuable with respect to the Award may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise encumbered or disposed of until (i) the Restricted Stock
Units have vested as provided in Paragraph 2 of this Agreement and (ii) shares of Stock have been issued to the Grantee in accordance with the terms of the Plan and this
Agreement.

SECTION 2. Vesting of Restricted Stock Units. The restrictions and conditions of Paragraph 1 of this Agreement shall lapse on the Vesting Date or Dates specified in
the following schedule so long as the Grantee remains in service as a member of the Board on such Dates. If a series of Vesting Dates is specified, then the restrictions and
conditions in Paragraph 1 shall lapse only with respect to the number of Restricted Stock Units specified as vested on such date.

Incremental Number of
Restricted Stock Units Vested
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)

Vesting Date

The Administrator may at any time accelerate the vesting schedule specified in this Paragraph 2.

SECTION 3. Termination of Service. If the Grantee’s service with the Company and its Subsidiaries terminates for any reason (including death or disability) prior to
the satisfaction of the vesting conditions set forth in Paragraph 2 above, any Restricted Stock Units that have not vested as of such date shall automatically and without notice
terminate and be forfeited, and neither the Grantee nor any of his or her successors, heirs, assigns, or personal representatives will thereafter have any further rights or interests
in such unvested Restricted Stock Units.

SECTION 4. Issuance of Shares of Stock. As soon as practicable following each Vesting Date (but in no event later than two and one-half months after the end of the
year in which the Vesting Date occurs), the Company shall issue to the Grantee the number of shares of Stock equal to the aggregate number of Restricted Stock Units that have
vested pursuant to Paragraph 2 of this Agreement on such date and the Grantee shall thereafter have all the rights of a stockholder of the Company with respect to such shares.

SECTION 5. Incorporation of Plan. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement shall be subject to and governed by all the terms and conditions
of the Plan, including the powers of the Administrator set forth in Section 2(b) of the Plan. Capitalized terms in this Agreement shall have the meaning specified in the Plan,
unless a different meaning is specified herein.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SECTION 6. Section 409A of the Code. This Agreement shall be interpreted in such a manner that all provisions relating to the settlement of the Award are exempt

from the requirements of Section 409A of the Code as “short-term deferrals” as described in Section 409A of the Code.

SECTION 7. No Obligation to Continue as a Director. Neither the Plan nor this Award confers upon the Grantee any rights with respect to continuance as a Director.

SECTION  8. Integration.  This Agreement  constitutes  the  entire  agreement  between  the  parties  with  respect  to  this Award  and  supersedes  all  prior  agreements  and

discussions between the parties concerning such subject matter.

SECTION  9. Data  Privacy  Consent.  In  order  to  administer  the  Plan  and  this  Agreement  and  to  implement  or  structure  future  equity  grants,  the  Company,  its
subsidiaries and affiliates and certain agents thereof (together, the “Relevant Companies”) may process any and all personal or professional data, including but not limited to
Social Security or other identification number, home address and telephone number, date of birth and other information that is necessary or desirable for the administration of
the Plan or this Agreement (the “Relevant Information”). By entering into this Agreement, the Grantee (i) authorizes the Company to collect, process, register and transfer to the
Relevant  Companies  all  Relevant  Information;  (ii)  waives  any  privacy  rights  the  Grantee  may  have  with  respect  to  the  Relevant  Information;  (iii)  authorizes  the  Relevant
Companies  to  store  and  transmit  such  information  in  electronic  form;  and  (iv)  authorizes  the  transfer  of  the  Relevant  Information  to  any  jurisdiction  in  which  the  Relevant
Companies consider appropriate. The Grantee shall have access to, and the right to change, the Relevant Information. Relevant Information will only be used in accordance with
applicable law.

SECTION 10. Notices. Notices hereunder shall be mailed or delivered to the Company at its principal place of business and shall be mailed or delivered to the Grantee

at the address on file with the Company or, in either case, at such other address as one party may subsequently furnish to the other party in writing.

POLARITYTE, INC.

By:
Name:  
Title:

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
              
 
 
 
 
The foregoing Agreement is hereby accepted, and the terms and conditions thereof hereby agreed to by the undersigned. Electronic acceptance of this Agreement pursuant to the
Company’s instructions to the Grantee (including through an online acceptance process) is acceptable.

Dated:

Grantee’s Signature

Grantee’s Name and address:

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
FOR COMPANY EMPLOYEES
UNDER THE POLARITYTE, INC.
2020 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

Exhibit 10.23

Name of Optionee:

No. of Restricted Stock Units:

Grant Date:

Pursuant to the PolarityTE, Inc. 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan as amended through the date hereof (the “Plan”), PolarityTE, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
grants  an  award  of  the  number  of  Restricted  Stock  Units  listed  above  (an  “Award”)  to  the  Grantee  named  above.  Each  Restricted  Stock  Unit  shall  relate  to  one  share  of
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Stock”) of the Company.

SECTION 1. Restrictions on Transfer of Award. This Award may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise encumbered or disposed of by the Grantee,
and any shares of Stock issuable with respect to the Award may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise encumbered or disposed of until (i) the Restricted Stock
Units have vested as provided in Paragraph 2 of this Agreement and (ii) shares of Stock have been issued to the Grantee in accordance with the terms of the Plan and this
Agreement.

SECTION 2. Vesting of Restricted Stock Units. The restrictions and conditions of Paragraph 1 of this Agreement shall lapse on the Vesting Date or Dates specified in
the following schedule so long as the Grantee continues to have a Service Relationship with the Company or a Subsidiary on such dates. If a series of Vesting Dates is specified,
then the restrictions and conditions in Paragraph 1 shall lapse only with respect to the number of Restricted Stock Units specified as vested on such date.

Incremental Number of
Restricted Stock Units Vested
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)
___________ (___%)

Vesting Date

The Administrator may at any time accelerate the vesting schedule specified in this Paragraph 2.

SECTION 3. Termination of Service Relationship. If the Grantee’s Service Relationship with the Company and its Subsidiaries terminates for any reason (including
death  or  disability)  prior  to  the  satisfaction  of  the  vesting  conditions  set  forth  in  Paragraph  2  above,  any  Restricted  Stock  Units  that  have  not  vested  as  of  such  date  shall
automatically and without notice terminate and be forfeited, and neither the Grantee nor any of his or her successors, heirs, assigns, or personal representatives will thereafter
have any further rights or interests in such unvested Restricted Stock Units.

SECTION 4. Issuance of Shares of Stock. As soon as practicable following each Vesting Date (but in no event later than two and one-half months after the end of the
year in which the Vesting Date occurs), the Company shall issue to the Grantee the number of shares of Stock equal to the aggregate number of Restricted Stock Units that have
vested pursuant to Paragraph 2 of this Agreement on such date and the Grantee shall thereafter have all the rights of a stockholder of the Company with respect to such shares.

SECTION 5. Incorporation of Plan. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement shall be subject to and governed by all the terms and conditions
of the Plan, including the powers of the Administrator set forth in Section 2(b) of the Plan. Capitalized terms in this Agreement shall have the meaning specified in the Plan,
unless a different meaning is specified herein.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SECTION  6. Tax Withholding .  The  Grantee  shall,  not  later  than  the  date  as  of  which  the  receipt  of  this Award  becomes  a  taxable  event  for  Federal  income  tax
purposes, pay to the Company or make arrangements satisfactory to the Administrator for payment of any Federal, state, and local taxes required by law to be withheld on
account of such taxable event. The Company shall have the authority to cause the required tax withholding obligation to be satisfied, in whole or in part, by withholding from
shares of Stock to be issued to the Grantee a number of shares of Stock with an aggregate Fair Market Value that would satisfy the withholding amount due; provided, however,
that the amount withheld does not exceed the maximum statutory tax rate or such lesser amount as is necessary to avoid adverse accounting treatment or as determined by the
Administrator.

SECTION 7. Section 409A of the Code. This Agreement shall be interpreted in such a manner that all provisions relating to the settlement of the Award are exempt

from the requirements of Section 409A of the Code as “short-term deferrals” as described in Section 409A of the Code.

SECTION 8. No Obligation to Continue Service Relationship. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is obligated by or as a result of the Plan or this Agreement to
continue the Grantee in the Service Relationship and neither the Plan nor this Agreement shall interfere in any way with the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate
the Service Relationship of the Grantee at any time.

SECTION  9. Integration.  This Agreement  constitutes  the  entire  agreement  between  the  parties  with  respect  to  this Award  and  supersedes  all  prior  agreements  and

discussions between the parties concerning such subject matter.

SECTION  10. Data  Privacy  Consent.  In  order  to  administer  the  Plan  and  this Agreement  and  to  implement  or  structure  future  equity  grants,  the  Company,  its
subsidiaries and affiliates and certain agents thereof (together, the “Relevant Companies”) may process any and all personal or professional data, including but not limited to
Social Security or other identification number, home address and telephone number, date of birth and other information that is necessary or desirable for the administration of
the Plan or this Agreement (the “Relevant Information”). By entering into this Agreement, the Grantee (i) authorizes the Company to collect, process, register and transfer to the
Relevant  Companies  all  Relevant  Information;  (ii)  waives  any  privacy  rights  the  Grantee  may  have  with  respect  to  the  Relevant  Information;  (iii)  authorizes  the  Relevant
Companies  to  store  and  transmit  such  information  in  electronic  form;  and  (iv)  authorizes  the  transfer  of  the  Relevant  Information  to  any  jurisdiction  in  which  the  Relevant
Companies consider appropriate. The Grantee shall have access to, and the right to change, the Relevant Information. Relevant Information will only be used in accordance with
applicable law.

SECTION 11. Notices. Notices hereunder shall be mailed or delivered to the Company at its principal place of business and shall be mailed or delivered to the Grantee

at the address on file with the Company or, in either case, at such other address as one party may subsequently furnish to the other party in writing.

POLARITYTE, INC.

By:
Name:
Title:

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
 
 
 
The foregoing Agreement is hereby accepted, and the terms and conditions thereof hereby agreed to by the undersigned. Electronic acceptance of this Agreement pursuant to the
Company’s instructions to the Grantee (including through an online acceptance process) is acceptable.

Dated:

Grantee’s Signature

Grantee’s Name and address:

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sublease Date:
Sublandlord:
Subtenant:
Premises:

Master Landlord:
Master Lease:

Notice Addresses:

Commencement Date:
Rent Commencement Date:

Expiration Date:

Renewal Terms:
Base Rent:

Additional Rent:
Subtenant’s Share:
Permitted Use:

Brokers:
Exhibits/Attachments:

SUBLEASE

KEY PROVISIONS

Exhibit 10.28

April 12, 2019
JOSEPH M. STILL BURN CENTERS, INC., a Georgia corporation
POLARITYTE MD, INC., a Nevada corporation
Those certain  premises  containing  approximately  7,000  rentable  square  feet  of  space  located  at  3647  J.  Dewey  Grey  Circle,
Augusta, Richmond County, Georgia, known as Suite 251 and as more particularly shown on Exhibit B attached hereto. Subtenant
approves and accepts the aforementioned square footage of the Premises.
DOC-MOB AUGUSTA II, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
Lease between  Master  Landlord,  as  landlord,  and  Sublandlord,  as  tenant,  dated  June  24,  2016,  for  the  lease  of  the  Premises  and
certain other premises by Master Landlord to Sublandlord, all as more particularly set forth in the Master Lease. The Master Lease is
attached hereto as Exhibit A. The “Master Lease” shall also include any future amendments, modifications and/or extensions of the
Master Lease.
Sublandlord:
Joseph M. Still Burn Centers, Inc.
3651 Wheeler Road, Suite 300
Augusta, Georgia 30909
Attention: Fred Mullins, MD

Subtenant:
PolarityTE MD, Inc.
c/o PolarityTE, Inc.
123 N Wright Brothers Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Attn: General Counsel
phone: 800-560-3983
email: legal@polarityte.com

The Sublease Date
The earlier of (i) the date of Subtenant’s receipt of a certificate of occupancy allowing Subtenant to use and occupy the Premises, or
(ii) the date that is one hundred twenty (120) days after the Sublease Date.
The date five (5) years after the Rent Commencement Date, provided that if such date falls during the middle of a month, then the
Expiration Date shall be the last day of such month.
One (1) renewal term of three (3) years, followed by one (1) renewal term of two (2) years.

Period

Monthly Base Rent

$11,083.34
$11,415.84
$11,758.32

Initial Term
1st Renewal Term
2nd Renewal Term
For the purpose of this Sublease, “Lease Year” means each successive consecutive twelve (12) month period during the Sublease
Term commencing on the Rent Commencement Date, provided that if the Rent Commencement Date is not on the first (1st) day of a
calendar month, then the first (1st) Lease Year shall commence on the Rent Commencement Date and shall end on the last day of
the calendar month one (1) year after the Rent Commencement Date.
See Section 4 of this Sublease.
15.19%
Subject to (and to the extent permitted by) any restrictions and limitations in the Master Lease and/or in this Sublease and subject to
(and  to  the  extent  permitted  by)  all  applicable  laws,  ordinances,  regulations  and  other  governmental  and  quasi-governmental
requirements,  only  for  operating  a  biomedical  manufacturing  facility,  laboratory  and  related  office  use,  and/or  other  legitimate
business purpose of Subtenant.
None.
Exhibit A – Master Lease
Exhibit B – Floor Plan
Consent of Master Landlord

Sublandlord’s Initials _________ Subtenant’s Initials _________

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
THIS SUBLEASE is made as of the Sublease Date between Sublandlord and Subtenant, and is consented to by Master Landlord pursuant to the Consent of Master

Landlord attached to this Sublease.

SUBLEASE AGREEMENT

Recitals

A. Sublandlord leases the Premises from Master Landlord pursuant to the Master Lease. Sublandlord desires to sublease to Subtenant the Premises pursuant to this

Sublease and Subtenant desires to sublease from Sublandlord the Premises pursuant to this Sublease, all upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Sublease.

For  good  and  valuable  consideration,  the  receipt  and  sufficiency  of  which  is  acknowledged,  Sublandlord  subleases  unto  Subtenant,  and  Subtenant  subleases  from

Sublandlord, the Premises upon the following terms and conditions:

1. Master Lease. Each reference in this Sublease to any Key Provision shall incorporate all of the terms provided for under such Key Provision and shall be read in conjunction
with all other provisions of this Sublease applicable thereto. Subtenant acknowledges and agrees that Subtenant has received and reviewed the Master Lease, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A. Subtenant covenants and agrees that this Sublease is made upon, and shall be subject and subordinate to: (A) all of the
terms,  covenants  and  conditions  of  the  Master  Lease,  except  Sections  1,  2.1,  8,  12,  20,  24.14,  25,  and  26  and  Exhibits  B,  C,  D,  and  E  (including  all  future  amendments,
modifications and extensions of the Master Lease made by Sublandlord from time to time; provided that no such amendment, modification or extension shall be binding upon
Subtenant if such amendment, modification or extension would decrease the rights of Subtenant (other than to a de minimis extent) or increase the obligations of Subtenant
under  this  Sublease  (other  than  to  a  de  minimis  extent)  unless  consented  to  by  Subtenant  (which  consent  shall  not  be  unreasonably  withheld,  conditioned  or  delayed),  and
Sublandlord shall provide notice to Subtenant of all other non-material amendments and modifications of the Master Lease), (B) all mortgages, leases and other documents to
which  the  Master  Lease  is  (or  may  hereafter  become)  subject  and  subordinate  in  accordance  with  the  terms  and  conditions  of  the  Master  Lease,  and  (C)  all  easements,
covenants,  conditions,  restrictions  and  other  matters  of  record.  Subtenant  shall,  within  ten  (10)  business  days  of  request,  execute  such  commercially  reasonable  certificates
and/or instruments requested by Sublandlord to confirm such subordination. Except as otherwise provided in this Sublease, Subtenant covenants and agrees to and for the benefit
of Sublandlord, and Subtenant represents and warrants to Sublandlord, (a) to assume, faithfully perform and comply with, observe and be bound by all of the terms, covenants,
obligations, agreements and conditions required to be performed or observed by Sublandlord (as the “Tenant” under the Master Lease) under the Master Lease with respect to
the  Premises,  all  of  which  shall  constitute  terms  of  this  Sublease;  (b)  to  faithfully  comply  with,  observe  and  be  bound  by  all  rules  and  regulations  (if  any)  promulgated  by
Master Landlord pursuant to the Master Lease or otherwise attached to the Master Lease, all of which shall constitute terms of this Sublease; (c) to indemnify, protect, defend,
hold  harmless  and  reimburse  Sublandlord  from,  for  and  against  any  and  all  liabilities,  penalties,  demands,  claims,  damages  (including,  without  limitation,  consequential
damages),  costs  and  expenses  (including,  without  limitation,  attorneys’  fees  and  court  costs)  incurred  under  or  pursuant  to  the  Master  Lease  or  otherwise  by  reason  of
Subtenant’s failure to fully comply with or observe any of the terms, covenants, obligations, agreements or conditions required to be performed or observed by Sublandlord (as
the “Tenant” under the Master Lease) under the Master Lease with respect to the Premises unless arising from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Sublandlord; (d)
that any default by Master Landlord under the Master Lease shall not affect this Sublease or waive or defer the performance of any of Subtenant’s obligations or covenants
under this Sublease; (e) that Subtenant shall not do or cause to be done any act which would or might cause the Master Lease or the rights of Sublandlord as “Tenant” under the
Master Lease to be endangered, canceled, terminated, forfeited or surrendered, or which would or would reasonably be expected to cause Sublandlord to be in default or breach
under the Master Lease or liable for any damage, claim or penalty under the Master Lease; and (f) to obtain Sublandlord’s  consent  whenever  Master  Landlord’s  consent  is
required under the Master Lease; provided that such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. If there is any conflict between the provisions of this
Sublease and the provisions of the Master Lease which would (or may) permit Subtenant to do or cause to be done any act which is (or may be) prohibited by the Master Lease,
then, unless otherwise specified by Sublandlord in Sublandlord’s sole discretion, the provisions of the Master Lease shall prevail. Subtenant acknowledges and agrees that: (1)
Sublandlord does not covenant or agree to do or perform any obligations or covenants undertaken or assumed by Master Landlord under the Master Lease, provided that in the
event  that  Subtenant  determines  in  good  faith  that  Master  Landlord  has  not  performed  its  obligations  under  the  Master  Lease  and  such  failure  materially  interferes  with
Subtenant’s use of the Premises, then upon receipt of written notice from Subtenant, Sublandlord shall, at Subtenant’s expense to the extent such failure relates to the Premises
(including  Subtenant  reimbursing  Sublandlord  for  Sublandlord’s  reasonable  attorneys’  fees),  be  obligated  to  use  commercially  reasonable  efforts  to  cause  such  breaches,
defaults or failures of Master Landlord under the Master Lease to be resolved or otherwise settled to Sublandlord’s and Subtenant’s reasonable satisfaction, provided that in no
event shall Sublandlord be required or obligated to terminate the Master Lease, and (2) Sublandlord shall not be liable to Subtenant for any early termination of, or any default
under, the Master Lease which is not caused by a default on the part of Sublandlord. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Sublease or otherwise, Subtenant shall not have
any  right  or  privilege  (and  Subtenant  shall  not  have  the  right  or  ability  to  exercise  any  right  or  privilege)  granted  to  Sublandlord  under  or  pursuant  to  the  Master  Lease,
including, without limitation, any consent or approval right, any right to renew or extend the term of the Master Lease, right of first refusal to purchase, right of first refusal to
lease, right of first offer, option to purchase, option to lease or any other similar right or option granted in the Master Lease or any other right or option granted to Sublandlord in
the Master Lease or otherwise. In addition, nothing contained in this Sublease or otherwise shall obligate (or be deemed to obligate) Sublandlord to exercise any renewal or
extension right or option. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Sublease, if the Master Lease is terminated for any reason or otherwise expires, then this
Sublease shall automatically terminate and be of no further force or effect (except for Subtenant’s obligations, liabilities and indemnities under this Sublease which survive any
such termination or expiration) without any liability to Sublandlord, and Subtenant shall vacate the Premises prior to the expiration or termination of the Master Lease, and
Subtenant shall have no further rights or interest in or to the Premises or under this Sublease.

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Further, except as otherwise stated herein, the parties understand that (i) references in the Master Lease to the “Premises” shall be deemed to refer to the Premises
defined under this Sublease, (ii) references in the Master Lease to the “Landlord” and to the “Tenant” shall be deemed to refer to “Sublandlord” and “Subtenant” under this
Sublease, respectively, (iii) references in the Master Lease to the “Term” shall be deemed to refer to the “Sublease Term”, (iv) references in the Master Lease to the “Base
Rent,”  shall  be  deemed  to  refer  to  the  Base  Rent  defined  under  this  Sublease,  (v)  references  in  the  Master  Lease  to  the  “Additional  Rent,”  shall  be  deemed  to  refer  to  the
Additional Rent defined in this Sublease, and (vi) references in the Master Lease to “Tenant’s Proportionate Share” shall be deemed to refer to Subtenant’s Share as defined
under this Sublease. It is further understood that, except as otherwise stated herein, where reference is made in the Master Lease to “this Lease” the same shall be deemed to
refer to “this Sublease.” All capitalized and other terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Master Lease, unless the context clearly
requires otherwise. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, Sublandlord is not assuming (and Sublandlord shall not be liable or obligated for) any of Master
Landlord’s obligations, covenants, agreements or liabilities under the Master Lease.

2. Sublease Term. Unless terminated earlier pursuant to the terms of this Sublease, the term of this Sublease shall begin on the Commencement Date and shall continue until the
Expiration Date (the “Sublease Initial Term”). Subtenant shall have the right to extend the Sublease Initial Term for the Renewal Terms, provided that (i) Subtenant is not in
default under this Sublease at the time Subtenant exercises each Renewal Term or at the commencement of each Renewal Term, (ii) the Master Lease and this Sublease are both
in full force and effect, and (iii) Subtenant provides to Sublandlord written notice exercising the Renewal Term at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the expiration of
the then current Sublease Term (time being of the essence). The Sublease Renewal Terms, if exercised by Subtenant, shall be upon all the terms and conditions set forth in this
Sublease, except as to the Renewal Term being exercised. “Sublease Term” means the Sublease Initial Term and the Sublease Renewal Terms (if exercised). Base Rent during
each Lease Year shall increase by three percent (3%) as set forth under “Base Rent” in the Key Provisions of this Sublease.

3. Rent. Subtenant shall pay to Sublandlord the Base Rent (plus applicable sales tax thereon), in advance, on the first day of each month, without notice, demand, deduction,
abatement or offset, commencing on the Rent Commencement Date and continuing during the remainder of the Sublease Term. The first monthly installment of Base Rent (plus
applicable sales tax thereon) shall be paid to Sublandlord by Subtenant on the Commencement Date. Base Rent for any partial calendar month shall be prorated on a per diem
basis. Subtenant shall pay any other amounts due under this Sublease within ten (10) business days of demand. If Sublandlord pays any amounts, sums or payments required to
be paid by Subtenant under this Sublease or for which Subtenant is otherwise responsible or liable for, then Subtenant shall reimburse Sublandlord for such amounts, sums or
payments within ten (10) business days of demand. In addition, any additional rent and other sums payable by Subtenant under this Sublease for any partial calendar year or
month during the Sublease Term shall be prorated accordingly. Sublandlord and Subtenant acknowledge and agree that the Base Rent as set forth herein and any additional rent
payable hereunder (including any Base Rent increases, if any such increases are contemplated under this Sublease or are otherwise agreed upon by the parties), was determined
by a reputable third-party valuation consultant to be at fair market value and was determined to be commercially reasonable and without taking into account the volume or value
of any referrals or other business generated between the parties or affiliates of the parties.

4. Additional Rent; Repairs; Utilities.

(a) In addition to Subtenant’s obligation to pay Base Rent and Subtenant’s other obligations under this Sublease, Subtenant shall: (i) commencing on
the Commencement Date and continuing during the remainder of the Sublease Term, at Subtenant’s own cost and expense and without notice, deduction, abatement or
offset, perform, complete and pay for all repairs, replacements, maintenance, restorations and other  work  required  of  Sublandlord  (as  the  “Tenant”  under  the  Master
Lease)  under  the  Master  Lease  with  respect  to  the  Premises,  all  in  accordance  with  the  terms  and  provisions  of  the  Master  Lease,  (ii)  commencing  on  the  Rent
Commencement Date and continuing during the remainder of the Sublease Term, pay to Sublandlord Subtenant’s Share of all Operating Expenses (as defined in the
Master Lease, which amounts shall be estimated and reconciled as set forth in the Master Lease), and (iii) commencing on the Commencement Date and continuing
during the remainder of the Sublease Term, pay, prior to delinquency and to the appropriate utility company or other provider (or to Sublandlord if any such utility is
submetered, Subtenant acknowledging and agreeing that electricity will be submetered), for all utilities and services consumed in, at or from the Premises (including,
without limitation, water, sewer, power, electricity, telephone, internet and cable) to the extent such amounts are not included in Operating Expenses.

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(b)  Subtenant’s  Share  of  Operating  Expenses  shall  be  paid  in  monthly  installments  beginning  on  the  date  of  the  first  payment  of  Base  Rent,  and
thereafter  on  the  first  day  of  each  month,  in  such  amounts  as  are  reasonably  estimated  by  Sublandlord.  Subtenant  acknowledges  and  agrees  that  that  any  statements
received from Master Landlord with respect to Operating Expenses shall be conclusive and binding upon Subtenant.

(c) Subtenant shall pay and be responsible for paying directly to the utility provider all utilities which are separately metered to the Premises. If any
utilities provided to the Premises are separately submetered, then Sublandlord will provide Subtenant with monthly invoices for the costs of such utilities and Subtenant
shall pay such  invoices  within  thirty  (30)  days  after  receipt  thereof.  Subtenant  shall  pay  and  be  responsible  for  paying  all  costs  of  telephone,  television,  internet  and
security installations and service serving the Premises solely. Subtenant shall also pay and be responsible for all costs, expenses and fees of all heat, ventilation and air
conditioning supplied to the Premises. Subtenant acknowledges and agrees that the heat, ventilation and air conditioning for the Premises may not be separately metered
to the Premises and that the heat, ventilation and air conditioning system that serves the Premises may serve other space in the Building. In such event, Subtenant shall
pay to Sublandlord (or as Sublandlord shall otherwise direct), and Subtenant shall be liable and responsible for, Subtenant’s proportionate share of the costs, expenses
and fees of such heat, ventilation and air conditioning (including the costs, expenses and fees of all electricity for the heat, ventilation and air conditioning system), but
excluding the costs, expenses and fees of operating, maintaining, repairing and replacing the heat, ventilation and air conditioning system; provided that Subtenant shall
not be liable for such costs, expenses and fees to the extent such costs, expenses and/or fees are already included as an Operating Expense. For the purpose of this Section
4(c), Subtenant’s proportionate share shall be a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the total rentable square footage of the Premises and the denominator of which
shall be the total rentable square footage of all space served by the heat, ventilation and air conditioning system (including the Premises).

(d)  Sublandlord  shall  have  no  obligation  under  this  Sublease  or  otherwise  to,  and  shall  not  be  responsible  for  the  failure  of  any  other  party  to,
maintain, repair, replace or restore the Premises (or any portion thereof); provided that in the event that Subtenant determines in good faith that Master Landlord has not
performed its obligations under the Master Lease and such failure materially interferes with Subtenant’s use of the Premises, then upon receipt of written notice from
Subtenant, Sublandlord shall, at Subtenant’s expense to the extent such failure relates to the Premises (including Subtenant reimbursing Sublandlord for Sublandlord’s
reasonable attorneys’ fees), be obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause such breaches, defaults or failures of Master Landlord under the Master Lease
to  be  resolved  or  otherwise  settled  to  Sublandlord’s  and  Subtenant’s  reasonable  satisfaction,  provided  that  in  no  event  shall  Sublandlord  be  required  or  obligated  to
terminate the Master Lease. On or before the Commencement Date, Subtenant shall, at Subtenant’s own cost and expense, have all utilities for the Premises transferred
into  Subtenant’s  name  and  pay  to  the  applicable  utility  provider  any  and  all  deposits  and  fees  required  in  connection  with  all  utilities  solely  serving  the  Premises.
Subtenant’s  obligations  under  this Section  4  that  accrued  prior  to  the  expiration  or  earlier  termination  of  this  Sublease  shall  survive  the  expiration  or  any  earlier
termination of this Sublease.

5. Insurance.

(a)  Subtenant  shall,  at  Subtenant’s  own  cost,  maintain  throughout  the  Sublease  Term  all  of  the  insurance  coverage  required  to  be  maintained  by
Sublandlord (as the “Tenant” under the Master Lease) under the Master Lease, all pursuant to and in accordance with the terms and requirements of the Master Lease.
Subtenant  covenants  and  agrees  that  all  such  insurance  shall  comply  with  all  of  the  terms  and  requirements  of  the  Master  Lease.  In  addition,  Subtenant  shall,  at
Subtenant’s own cost, also maintain throughout the Sublease Term commercial general liability insurance covering bodily injury, death and property damage (including
a contractual liability endorsement), with limits of not less than $2,000,000.00 per occurrence and with a $4,000,000.00 general aggregate limit, and with Sublandlord,
Master Landlord and their respective designees named as additional insureds thereunder.

4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(b)  Subtenant  shall  (i)  name  Sublandlord  and  Master  Landlord  as  additional  insureds  under  all  insurance  policies  required  to  be  maintained  by,  or
actually maintained by, Subtenant, and (ii) provide Sublandlord and Master Landlord, immediately upon demand, with certificates of insurance evidencing the insurance
required to be maintained by Subtenant under this Sublease. In addition, all insurance policies required to be maintained by Subtenant hereunder shall (A) provide that
such insurance shall not be canceled, terminated or changed or the coverage reduced without thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to Sublandlord and Master Landlord,
(B)  contain  a  waiver  of  subrogation  provision  in  favor  of  Sublandlord  and  Master  Landlord  in  form  and  substance  reasonably  acceptable  to  Sublandlord  and  Master
Landlord, (C) be issued by insurance companies authorized and licensed to do business in the State where the Premises are located and by insurance companies who
have a general policy holder’s rating of not less than “A XII” as stated in the most current available Best’s Insurance Reports and who are also authorized to issue such
policies, (D) contain deductibles acceptable to Sublandlord in Sublandlord’s reasonable discretion, and (E) otherwise be in form and substance acceptable to Sublandlord
in Sublandlord’s reasonable discretion.

(c)  Notwithstanding  anything  contained  in  this  Sublease  or  otherwise,  (i)  Sublandlord  shall  not  be  liable  to  Subtenant  for  (and  Subtenant  hereby
unconditionally waives all claims against Sublandlord in connection with) any loss or damage to any property (including, without limitation, any property, equipment or
contents of the Premises or located on the Premises) from any cause whatsoever, including, without limitation, the negligence or misconduct of Sublandlord or any of
Sublandlord’s  agents,  invitees,  employees,  contractors  or  representatives;  and  (ii)  Master  Landlord  shall  not  be  liable  to  Subtenant  for  (and  Subtenant  hereby
unconditionally  waives  all  claims  against  Master  Landlord  in  connection  with)  any  loss  or  damage  to  any  property  (including,  without  limitation,  any  property,
equipment or contents of the Premises or located on the Premises) from any cause whatsoever, including, without limitation, the negligence or misconduct of Master
Landlord or any of Master Landlord’s agents, invitees, employees, contractors or representatives. All policies of fire and extended coverage or other property damage
insurance  maintained  (or  required  by  this  Sublease  to  be  maintained)  by  Subtenant  shall  contain  an  endorsement  in  which  the  insurer  recognizes  this  release  by  its
insured  and  waives  all  rights  of  legal  and  conventional  subrogation  against  the  other  party,  and  Subtenant  agrees  that  no  insurer  shall  hold  any  right  of  subrogation
against Sublandlord or Master Landlord.

(d) Subtenant’s obligations and agreements under this Section 5 shall survive the expiration or any earlier termination of this Sublease.

6. Use; Indemnification; Waiver. During Subtenant’s use of the Premises during the Sublease Term, Subtenant shall be afforded the right to use the Premises on an exclusive
basis (subject to the other terms of this Sublease and the terms of the Master Lease). Subtenant shall (a) use the Premises for the Permitted Use only and for no other use or
purpose; (b) not conduct in or on the Premises (nor permit to be conducted in or on the Premises) waste or any business which is in violation of any governmental or quasi-
governmental law, rule, regulation, ordinance or requirement or any insurance requirement or in violation of the Master Lease; and (c) maintain the Premises in a sanitary, clean,
safe and operable condition and otherwise in a manner and condition acceptable to Sublandlord in Sublandlord’s reasonable discretion subject to ordinary wear and tear and
casualty  damage.  Subtenant  represents  and  warrants  to  Sublandlord  that  Subtenant  is  authorized  to  enter  into  this  Sublease,  and  that  Subtenant  is  a  validly  existing  entity
authorized  to  do  business  in  the  State  where  the  Premises  are  located.  Sublandlord  represents  and  warrants  to  Subtenant  that  (i)  Sublandlord  is  authorized  to  enter  into  this
Sublease and (ii) as of the date hereof, to the actual knowledge of Sublandlord, Sublandlord and Master Landlord are in compliance with the terms, conditions and covenants of
the Master Lease in all material respects. Without limiting any other indemnification set forth in this Sublease and except to the extent arising from the gross negligence or
willful misconduct of Sublandlord or Master Landlord, Subtenant shall indemnify, protect, defend, reimburse and hold harmless Sublandlord and Master Landlord from, for and
against  any  and  all  damages  (including,  without  limitation,  consequential  damages),  losses,  liabilities,  judgments,  costs,  claims,  liens,  expenses,  penalties,  suits,  demands,
actions, fines and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees and court costs) directly or indirectly arising out of or relating to (i) any act or omission of Subtenant
or any of Subtenant’s employees, agents, invitees, customers or contractors, (ii) the use or occupancy of the Premises, or (iii) any default or breach by Subtenant under this
Sublease. Without limiting any other indemnification set forth in this Sublease, Sublandlord shall indemnify, protect, defend, reimburse and hold harmless Subtenant from, for
and against any and all damages (excluding consequential damages which both parties agree not to seek), losses, liabilities, judgments, costs, claims, liens, expenses, penalties,
suits,  demands,  actions,  fines  and  expenses  (including,  without  limitation,  attorneys’  fees  and  court  costs)  directly  or  indirectly  arising  out  of  or  relating  to  (A)  the  gross
negligence or willful misconduct of Sublandlord or any of Sublandlord’s employees, agents, invitees, customers or contractors, or (B) any default or breach by Sublandlord
under this Sublease. This Section 6 shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Sublease.

5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7. Condition of Premises; Alterations; Repairs.

(a) Subtenant has examined the Premises and accepts the Premises in “AS IS” and “WHERE IS” condition, with all faults and defects, both known
and  unknown,  and  Subtenant  acknowledges  and  agrees  that  neither  Sublandlord  nor  any  of  Sublandlord’s  agents,  employees  or  representatives  have  made  any
representation or warranty, either express or implied, with respect to the Premises or the use thereof by Subtenant or the condition of the Premises or the size or square
footage  of  the  Premises;  provided  that  Sublandlord  represents,  to  its  actual  knowledge  without  a  duty  to  investigate,  that  the  Premises  are  not  in  violation  of  any
applicable  laws  in  any  material  respect  and  that  there  are  no  material  damages  or  material  defects  with  respect  to  the  Premises  that  would  not  be  detected  during  a
physical  inspection.  Subtenant  further  acknowledges  and  agrees  that  no  representations  or  promises  to  alter,  remodel  or  improve  the  Premises  have  been  made  by
Sublandlord or Master Landlord or any other person or entity, and Sublandlord shall have no obligation under this Sublease or otherwise to, and shall not be responsible
for the failure of any other party to, maintain, repair or replace the Premises. Subtenant shall use the Premises at Subtenant’s own risk. Sublandlord shall not be liable to
Subtenant or any of Subtenant’s employees, licensees, invitees or guests or any other person for any loss, injury or damage to property or person occasioned by theft,
casualty, force majeure or any other cause.

(b) Subtenant shall not make (or permit or allow to be made) any alterations, additions, improvements, repairs or replacements to the Premises without
the prior written consent of Sublandlord (and Master Landlord if required by the Master Lease), provided that such consent of Sublandlord shall not be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed. If Subtenant desires to perform any alterations, additions, improvements, repairs or replacements to the Premises, then Sublandlord
shall  have  the  right  to  require  Subtenant  to  prepare,  at  Subtenant’s  expense,  plans  and  specifications  for  such  alterations,  additions,  improvements,  repairs  or
replacements  and  such  plans  and  specifications  shall  be  subject  to  the  prior  written  consent  of  Sublandlord  (and  Master  Landlord  if  required  by  the  Master  Lease),
provided  that  such  consent  of  Sublandlord  shall  not  be  unreasonably  withheld,  conditioned  or  delayed.  If  any  alterations,  additions,  improvements,  repairs  or
replacements are consented to by Sublandlord (and by Master Landlord if required by the Master Lease), then Subtenant shall (a) comply with all requirements of the
Master Lease with respect to such alterations, additions, improvements, repairs or replacements, (b) promptly (and in any event prior to its due date) pay in full all costs
and expenses incurred or associated with any such alterations, additions, improvements, repairs or replacements, (c) deliver to Sublandlord, within ten (10) business days
of  Sublandlord’s  written  or  oral  request,  detailed  proof  acceptable  to  Sublandlord  showing  that  all  outstanding  invoices  for  all  alterations,  additions,  improvements,
repairs  and  replacements  have  been  paid  in  full,  (d)  complete  and  perform  such  alterations,  additions,  improvements,  repairs  and  replacements  in  a  good  and
workmanlike manner and in compliance with all laws, codes and ordinances and all insurance requirements, and (e) complete and perform such alterations, additions,
improvements,  repairs  and  replacements  in  accordance  with  the  plans  and  specifications  (if  any)  approved  by  Sublandlord  and  otherwise  in  a  manner  acceptable  to
Sublandlord. Any alterations, additions, improvements, repairs or replacements made by or for (or at the request of) Subtenant and consented to by Sublandlord (and
Master Landlord if required by the Master Lease) shall remain on and be surrendered with the Premises upon the expiration or earlier termination of the Sublease Term
and Subtenant shall not be required to remove any such alterations, additions, improvements, repairs or replacements, unless required to be removed pursuant to the
Master  Lease,  in  which  case  Subtenant  shall,  at  Subtenant’s  own  cost,  promptly  and  diligently  remove  such  alterations,  additions,  improvements,  repairs  and
replacements and repair all damage caused by such removal.

6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(c) Subtenant’s obligations and liabilities under this Section 7 shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Sublease.

8. Default. The occurrence of one or more of the following events (each, an “Event of Default”) shall constitute an immediate default and Event of Default by Subtenant under
this Sublease: (a) the failure to pay Base Rent or any other sum due under this Sublease within five (5) days after receipt of notice of such failure, (b) the failure to maintain the
insurance required to be maintained by Subtenant under this Sublease; (c) the failure to perform or observe any other covenant, condition or agreement of this Sublease (other
than (a) or (b) above) required to be performed or observed by Subtenant which is not cured within thirty (30) days of Subtenant’s notice thereof; provided that if such failure
cannot be cured within such thirty (30) day period, Subtenant shall have such additional time as needed to cure such failure so long as Subtenant commences such cure within
such  thirty  (30)  day  period  and  diligently  prosecuted  such  cure  to  completion;  or  (d)  any  act,  occurrence,  matter,  circumstance  or  omission  which  does  or  would  (or  may)
constitute a breach, a default or an event of default under the terms of the Master Lease.

9. Sublandlord’s Remedies on Event of Default. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, Sublandlord shall have the immediate right to (i) terminate this Sublease and/or
Subtenant’s right to possession of the Premises at any time and reenter the Premises and remove Subtenant and all of Subtenant’s property from the Premises (and Subtenant
waives all claims against Sublandlord in connection therewith), and Subtenant shall vacate the Premises and remove all of Subtenant’s property from the Premises as promptly
as practicable, (ii) cure such Event of Default and Subtenant shall pay to Sublandlord upon demand all costs, expenses and fees incurred by or on behalf of Sublandlord in curing
such  Event  of  Default  (together  with  an  administrative  fee  equal  to  ten  percent  (10%)  of  such  costs,  expenses  and  fees),  and/or  (iii)  pursue  any  other  rights  and  remedies
available under the Master Lease, at law and/or in equity and to recover from Subtenant all amounts then due or thereafter accruing and such other damages (including, without
limitation, consequential damages) as are caused by such Event of Default. No course of dealing between Sublandlord and Subtenant or any delay on the part of Sublandlord in
exercising any rights or remedies Sublandlord may have under this Sublease shall operate as a waiver of any of Sublandlord’s rights or remedies, nor shall any waiver of a prior
default  operate  as  a  waiver  of  any  subsequent  default.  In  exercising  Sublandlord’s  rights  and  remedies  under  this  Sublease,  Sublandlord  shall  be  entitled  to  recover  from
Subtenant all costs incurred in connection therewith, including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees and court costs.

7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10. Brokers. Except for the Brokers listed in the Key Provisions, each Party represents and warrants to the other Party that such Party has not used (or dealt with) any broker in
connection  with  this  Sublease,  and  each  Party  agrees  to  indemnify,  protect,  defend  and  hold  the  other  Party  harmless  from  and  against  any  and  all  damages,  liabilities,
judgments, costs, claims, liens, expenses (including attorneys’ fees), penalties, suits, demands, actions and fines for or arising out of any brokerage commissions (or claims
therefor) arising out of or involving such Party’s actions in connection with this Sublease or any breach of the foregoing representation or warranty.

11. No Assignment and No Subletting.

(a) Subtenant shall not assign, transfer, encumber, mortgage or pledge this Sublease or any interest in this Sublease or in the Premises or sublet all or
any  part  of  the  Premises  or  permit  the  Premises  to  be  used  or  occupied  by  any  other  person  or  entity  (each,  a  “Transfer”)  without  the  prior  written  consent  of
Sublandlord and Master Landlord, provided that such consent of Sublandlord shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. In addition, Subtenant shall
not (i) use or occupy the Premises for (or permit the Premises to be used or occupied for) any use other than the Permitted Use, or (ii) use or occupy the Premises for (or
permit the Premises to be used or occupied for) any business operation or trade name other than Subtenant’s trade name set forth in the Key Provisions above, it being
the  intent  of  the  parties  that  Subtenant’s  rights,  benefits  and  privileges  under  this  Sublease  are  personal  to  the  named  Subtenant  herein  and  cannot  be  assigned,
transferred, encumbered, mortgaged or pledged. Consent by Sublandlord and Master Landlord to a Transfer shall not destroy or operate as a waiver of the prohibitions
contained in this Section 11 or in the Master Lease as to future Transfers, and all such future Transfers shall be made only with the prior written consent of Sublandlord
and  Master  Landlord.  If  Sublandlord  and  Master  Landlord  consent  to  a  Transfer,  then  Subtenant  shall  remain  liable  for  payment  of  all  Base  Rent  and  other  sums
provided for under this Sublease and for the faithful performance of all of the covenants, obligations, liabilities and conditions in and under this Sublease. Subtenant
agrees to reimburse Sublandlord for all costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by Sublandlord in connection with any Transfer or any Transfer request.
Sublandlord may assign or transfer this Sublease and/or any of Sublandlord’s rights or obligations under this Sublease and may delegate any of Sublandlord’s duties
under  this  Sublease.  If  Sublandlord  assigns  or  transfers  this  Sublease,  then  Sublandlord  shall  be  unconditionally  released  of  all  obligations  and  liabilities  under  this
Sublease from and after the effective date of such assignment or transfer, as applicable.

(b)  Notwithstanding  the  foregoing,  but  provided  that  Subtenant  is  not  in  default  under  this  Sublease,  Subtenant  shall  have  the  right,  without
Sublandlord’s consent (but  with  at  least  fifteen  (15)  days  advance  written  notice  to  Sublandlord),  to  assign  this  Sublease  in  its  entirety  to  a  Permitted  Transferee  (as
defined below) (a “Permitted Transfer”), provided that (and on the condition that) (i) as of the date of the Permitted Transfer, the Permitted Transferee has the financial
capacity to promptly and fully perform all of the obligations of the subtenant under this Sublease (including the prompt and full payment of all Base Rent due under this
Sublease), (ii) the Permitted Transferee assumes in writing for Sublandlord’s benefit all of the obligations and covenants to be performed and/or observed by Subtenant
under this Sublease and all of Subtenant’s liabilities under this Sublease, (iii) such Permitted Transfer shall be for the Permitted Use only, (iv) Sublandlord receives an
executed copy of the applicable Permitted Transfer document within seven (7) business days of the date of such Permitted Transfer, and (v) such Permitted Transfer
shall be subject to this Sublease and to all of the terms and provisions of this Sublease. “Permitted Transferee” means an entity that is controlling, controlled by, or
under common control with, Subtenant or to an entity that acquires all or substantially all of the business or assets of Subtenant. For purposes of this Section, the term
“control” shall mean the ability to direct the affairs of the entity either by way of ownership interest, management agreement or otherwise, without approval of any other
person  or  entity.  No  Permitted  Transfer  shall  release  the  original  Subtenant  from  any  obligations  and  liabilities  under  this  Sublease  or  release  any  guarantor  of  this
Sublease.

8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12. Entry. Master Landlord and Sublandlord shall have the same rights to enter the Premises as are provided to Master Landlord to enter the Premises pursuant to the Master
Lease, and Master Landlord and Sublandlord shall be accompanied at all times (except in the case of an emergency) by a representative of Subtenant, if requested by Subtenant.

13. Surrender; Holding Over. Upon the expiration or earlier termination of this Sublease (time being of the essence), Subtenant shall, at Subtenant’s sole cost and expense, (i)
remove from the Premises all of Subtenant’s equipment, trade fixtures, inventory and other personal property and repair any and all damage caused by such removal, and (ii)
deliver and surrender the Premises to Sublandlord in broom clean condition (subject to ordinary wear and tear and casualty damage), free and clear of all liens, charges and
encumbrances and in compliance with all laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and other governmental requirements and otherwise in the same condition as the Premises existed
on  the  Rent  Commencement  Date  and  in  the  condition  required  by  the  Master  Lease.  Subtenant  shall  have  no  right  to  occupy  the  Premises  or  any  portion  thereof  after  the
expiration or earlier termination of this Sublease. If Subtenant or any party claiming by, through or under Subtenant holds over or occupies the Premises after the expiration or
earlier  termination  of  this  Sublease,  then  Sublandlord  may  exercise  any  and  all  rights  and  remedies  available  under  the  Master  Lease,  at  law  and/or  in  equity  to  recover
possession of the Premises and to recover all damages in connection with such holdover, including, without limitation, all consequential damages and all damages and amounts
payable by Sublandlord to Master Landlord by reason of such holdover (including any holdover rent paid by Sublandlord to Master Landlord). In addition, for each and every
month or partial month that Subtenant or any party claiming by, through or under Subtenant holds over or occupies all or any portion of the Premises after the expiration or
earlier  termination  of  this  Sublease,  Subtenant  shall  also  pay  Sublandlord,  as  minimum  damages  and  not  as  a  penalty,  monthly  rent  at  a  rate  equal  to  125%  of  the  rate  of
monthly Base Rent payable by Subtenant under this Sublease immediately prior to the expiration or earlier termination of this Sublease. The acceptance by Sublandlord of any
lesser sum shall be construed as payment on account and not in satisfaction of damages for such holding over. This provision shall survive the expiration or earlier termination
of the Sublease Term.

14. Hazardous Materials.

(a)  In  addition  to  the  obligations,  restrictions  and  covenants  set  forth  in  the  Master  Lease,  Subtenant  and  Subtenant’s  employees,  agents,  invitees,
licensees or contractors shall not cause, permit or allow any substances, chemicals or materials (whether solid, liquid or gaseous) that are regulated, governed, restricted
or prohibited by, form the basis of liability under, or are defined as a contaminant, pollutant, dangerous, designated or controlled substance product, solid or hazardous
waste, hazardous substance, or toxic substance under any federal, state or local law (including common law), statute, code, ordinance, rule, regulation or permit relating
to pollution or occupational health or safety or protection of human health or the environment (including, without limitation, ambient air, surface water, groundwater,
land  surface  or  subsurface  strata)  (collectively,  “Environmental Laws”)  or  by  any  federal,  state  or  local  agency  or  authority,  including,  without  limitation,  any  oil,
gasoline, petroleum, petroleum by-products, car batteries, polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos or asbestos containing materials, or any other material or substance which
constitutes a health, safety or environmental hazard to any person or the environment (collectively, “Hazardous Materials”), to be handled, placed, stored, dumped,
dispensed,  released,  discharged,  disposed,  deposited,  distributed,  manufactured,  generated,  treated,  recycled,  processed,  used,  transported  or  otherwise  located  on,  in,
under or about the Premises, except as specifically permitted pursuant to Section 14(b) below.

9

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(b) Subtenant, at Subtenant’s sole cost and expense, shall be responsible for medical, special and infectious waste removal for the Premises and the
maintenance and storage thereof pending removal, all in accordance with all applicable laws, regulations and orders. Subtenant shall, at Subtenant’s expense, comply
with all federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances which govern the use, storage, handling and disposal of Hazardous Materials, wastes or materials and
medical,  special  or  infectious  wastes.  Subtenant  shall  indemnify,  defend  and  hold  Sublandlord  harmless  from  and  against  any  claims  or  liability  arising  out  of  or
connected with Subtenant’s failure to comply with the terms of this Section 14(a), which terms shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Sublease.

(c)  Upon  the  expiration  or  earlier  termination  of  this  Sublease,  Subtenant,  at  Subtenant’s  expense,  shall  remove  all  Hazardous  Materials  from  the
Premises introduced by Subtenant or any of Subtenant’s employees, agents, customers, vendors or invitees, all in compliance with Environmental Laws and in a manner
acceptable to Sublandlord.

(d)  Subtenant  shall  give  Sublandlord  immediate  written  notice  of  any  (1)  problem,  spill,  release,  discharge,  threatened  release  or  discharge,  or
discovery  of  any  Hazardous  Materials  on  or  about  the  Premises,  or  (2)  claim  or  notification  by  any  person  or  governmental  authority  relating  to  the  use,  presence,
discharge or release of Hazardous Materials on or about the Premises (collectively, the “ Environmental Condition”). If the Environmental Condition was caused, in
whole or in part, by Subtenant or Subtenant’s employees, agents, contractors, invitees or licensees or otherwise arises or occurs during the Sublease Term, then such
notice shall include a description of measures proposed to be taken by Subtenant to contain, remove and/or remediate such Hazardous Materials and any relating damage
or impact to the Premises, persons and/or the environment (including any offsite property). Upon Sublandlord’s and Master Landlord’s approval and at Subtenant’s own
expense, Subtenant shall promptly take all steps necessary to clean up and remediate the Environmental Condition caused by Subtenant or any of its agents, employees,
contractors or invitees in strict compliance with all Environmental Laws and to report and/or coordinate with Sublandlord and all appropriate governmental agencies with
respect to Subtenant’s efforts to address the Environmental Condition.

(e) Except to the extent arising from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Sublandlord and/or Master Landlord, Subtenant hereby protects,
defends, saves, indemnifies, releases and holds Sublandlord and Master Landlord harmless from and against all Liabilities (as defined below), whether or not resulting
from third party claims, suffered by, incurred by or assessed against Sublandlord or Master Landlord or their representatives, affiliates or subsidiaries and all of their
respective agents, employees, officers, directors, contractors, successors, assigns, attorneys or representatives as a result of the presence, disturbance, discharge, release,
threatened release, removal, remediation or cleanup of any Hazardous Materials located at, on, under or about the Premises during the Sublease Term by Subtenant or
any of its agents, employees, contractors or invitees or any of its agents, employees, contractors or invitees from any cause whatsoever. The term “Liabilities” as used
herein is hereby defined as any and all obligations, fines, suits, liabilities, expenses, demands, fees, sums, amounts, judgments, damages (including, without limitation,
punitive, exemplary and consequential damages and personal injury and property damages), expenses, costs (including, without limitation, attorneys’, accountants’ and
consultants’ fees and expenses, costs and services of any investigation, assessment, laboratory analysis, treatment, cleanup, containment, response action or remedial
action), liabilities, losses, causes of action, claims for relief, court costs, alternative dispute resolution expenses and other legal fees and professional fees.

10

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subtenant’s obligations and liabilities under this Section 14 shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Sublease.

15. Intentionally Omitted.

16. Notice. All notices required or permitted to be given under this Sublease shall be in writing and delivered by certified U.S. mail, return receipt requested, or by a national
overnight courier service (such as Fed Ex), and shall be deemed effective upon the earlier of (i) actual delivery, or (ii) refusal of delivery, and in all cases addressed to Subtenant
or Sublandlord at their respective addresses set forth in the Key Provisions. Either party may change its notice address under this Sublease by giving written notice to the other
party in accordance with this Section 16.

17. Miscellaneous.

(a) Counterparts. This Sublease may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts with all being deemed collectively as one (1) sublease.

more rights or remedies shall not be taken to exclude or waive the right to the exercise of any other.

(b) Cumulative Remedies. All rights and remedies of Sublandlord under this Sublease, at law and in equity are cumulative, and the exercise of one or

(c) Late Charge and Interest. If Subtenant fails to pay Sublandlord any sum required to be paid under this Sublease when due, then Subtenant shall
immediately pay to Sublandlord a late charge equal to the greater of (i) three percent (3%) of such late sum, or (ii) $500.00; provided that no such late charge shall be due
for the first late payment in any twelve (12) month period during the Sublease Term. In addition, if Subtenant fails to pay Sublandlord any sum required to be paid under
this Sublease within fifteen (15) business days of when due, then such unpaid sum shall accrue interest until paid in full at the lesser of (i) the maximum rate permitted
by law, or (ii) eighteen (18%) percent per annum, compounded monthly, and such interest shall begin to accrue from the due date of such sum. Such late charge and
interest  shall  be  due  and  payable  immediately  and  without  notice  from  Sublandlord.  Subtenant  acknowledges  that  the  aforementioned  late  charge  and  interest  are  in
addition to Sublandlord’s other rights and remedies available under this Sublease, at law or in equity. In addition, if any financial institution returns more than one of
Subtenant’s checks due to insufficient funds, then Sublandlord shall have the right to require Subtenant to make all future payments under this Sublease by certified bank
check.

(d) Entire Agreement. This Sublease represents the entire agreement between Sublandlord and Subtenant with respect to Sublandlord subleasing the
Premises  to  Subtenant,  and  all  prior  and  contemporaneous  discussions  and  documents  with  respect  thereto  are  superseded  by  this  Sublease.  Any  statement  or
representation not contained herein shall not be binding on either party. All subsequent amendments hereto must be in writing and signed by the parties hereto.

(e) Governing Law. This Sublease shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State where the Premises are located.

provision of this Sublease.

(f) Invalidity.  The  invalidity  or  unenforceability  of  any  term  in  this  Sublease  shall  not  affect  the  validity  or  enforceability  of  any  other  term  or

11

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
the waiver, and such waiver shall not be interpreted as a continuing waiver.

(g) Non-Waiver. No right or remedy under this Sublease shall be waived unless the waiver is in writing and signed by the party claimed to have made

assigns.

(h) Successors and Assigns. This Sublease shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, the parties hereto and their respective successors and

(i) Condemnation Awards. Subtenant shall have no right in or to any award or proceeds with respect to the Premises in connection with any taking of
the Premises by condemnation or deed in lieu thereof, and Subtenant unconditionally relinquishes and releases any right, title and interest Subtenant has (or may have) in
or to any such award or proceeds.

18. Signage. Any signage Subtenant desires to install on the Premises shall be installed in compliance with all laws and ordinances and all the terms and provisions of the Master
Lease. Such signage shall be subject to Sublandlord’s (and Master Landlord’s if required by the Master Lease) prior written approval (which approval of Sublandlord shall not
be  unreasonably  withheld)  and  shall  be  installed  and  maintained  at  Subtenant’s  own  cost  and  in  a  good  and  workmanlike  manner  and  in  compliance  with  all  laws  and
ordinances and all the terms and provisions of the Master Lease. Prior to the expiration or earlier termination of the Sublease Term, Subtenant shall remove all such signage
from the Premises and repair all damage caused by such removal (which obligation of Subtenant shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Sublease).

19. Liens. Subtenant shall not permit or suffer any lien to attach to the Premises or to the interest of Master Landlord or Sublandlord in the Premises or to Subtenant’s interest in
this Sublease or in the Premises. Subtenant shall indemnify, defend (with counsel acceptable to Sublandlord) and hold Master Landlord and Sublandlord harmless from and
against any such lien or claim of lien and any costs, expenses and liabilities relating thereto. If any such lien is filed, then Subtenant shall fully pay and discharge or bond over
such lien within ten (10) business days from the filing of such lien and in a manner acceptable to Sublandlord and Master Landlord. If Subtenant fails to fully pay and discharge
such lien or bond over such lien within ten (10) business days from the filing of such lien, then Sublandlord shall have the immediate right (but not the obligation) to pay and/or
discharge such lien at Subtenant’s sole cost, and Subtenant shall, within ten (10) business days of Sublandlord’s demand, pay all costs and expenses incurred by Sublandlord in
paying and/or discharging such lien. Subtenant’s failure to fully pay and discharge any such lien within such ten (10) business day time period shall also constitute an immediate
Event of Default under this Sublease. Subtenant’s indemnities and obligations under this  Section 19 shall survive any termination of this Sublease and the expiration of this
Sublease.

20. Recording; Confidentiality. Neither this Sublease nor any short form or memorandum of this Sublease shall be recorded, unless requested or required by Sublandlord.
Subtenant covenants and agrees that Subtenant and Subtenant’s employees, agents, lenders, attorneys, representatives, officers, accountants and members shall keep confidential
and  shall  not  disclose  the  financial  terms  of  this  Sublease  or  other  terms  of  this  Sublease  or  any  matters  related  to  this  Sublease  (including  the  Master  Lease)  without
Sublandlord’s prior written consent (which consent Sublandlord may withhold or condition in Sublandlord’s sole discretion).

21. Consent of Master Landlord. The Consent of Master Landlord executed by Master Landlord with respect to this Sublease (the “Consent”) is attached hereto and made a
part hereof and this Sublease shall not be effective unless and until such Consent has been obtained.

12

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
22. Regulatory Matters.

(a)  Sublandlord  and  Subtenant  enter  into  this  Sublease  with  the  intent  of  conducting  their  relationship  and  implementing  the  agreements  contained
herein in full compliance with applicable federal, state and local law, including without limitation, the Medicare/Medicaid Anti-Kickback statute (the “ Anti-Kickback
Law”) and Section 1877 of the Social Security Act (the “Stark Law”), as amended. Notwithstanding any unanticipated effect of any of the provisions of this Sublease,
neither party will intentionally conduct itself under the terms of this Sublease in a manner that would constitute a violation of the Anti-Kickback Law or the Stark Law.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Sublandlord and Subtenant expressly agree that nothing contained in this Sublease shall require either party or any of
their affiliates to refer any patients to the other, or to any affiliate or subsidiary of the other.

(b) If any legislation, regulation or government policy is passed or adopted, the effect of which would cause either party to be in violation of such laws
due to the existence of any provision of this Sublease, then Sublandlord and Subtenant agree to negotiate in good faith for a period of ninety (90) days to modify the
terms of this Sublease to comply with applicable laws and keeping the underlying economic terms of this Sublease as close as possible to the original economic terms of
this Sublease.

(c) For purposes of this Section of this Sublease, “protected health information”, or PHI, shall have the meaning defined by the Standards for Privacy
of Individually Identifiable Health Information, 45 C.F.R. Part 160 and Subparts A and E of Part 164 (the “ Privacy Standards”), as promulgated by the Department of
Health  and  Human  Services  (“HHS”)  pursuant  to  the Administrative  Simplification  provisions  of  the  Health  Insurance  Portability  and Accountability Act  of  1996
(“HIPAA”). The parties agree that neither the Sublandlord nor its contractors, subcontractors or agents shall need access to, nor shall they use or disclose, any PHI of
Subtenant.  However,  in  the  event  PHI  is  disclosed  by  Subtenant  or  its  agents  to  Sublandlord,  its,  contractors,  subcontractors  or  agents,  regardless  as  to  whether  the
disclosure is inadvertent or otherwise, Sublandlord agrees to take reasonable steps to maintain, and to require its contractors, subcontractors and agents to maintain, the
privacy and confidentiality of such PHI. The parties agree that the foregoing does not create, and is not intended to create, a “business associate” relationship between
the parties as that term is defined by the Privacy Standards.

[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]

13

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Witnesses:

JOSEPH M. STILL BURN CENTERS, INC., a Georgia corporation

The parties have executed this Sublease as of the Sublease Date.

SUBLANDLORD:

/s/ Annette Waters
Print Name

Witnesses:

/s/ Cameron Hoyler
Print Name

  By:

Print Name:
Title: 

/s/ Robert F. Mullins
Robert F. Mullins
As its President

SUBTENANT:

POLARITYTE MD, INC., a Nevada corporation

  By:

Print Name:
Title:

/s/ Paul Mann
Paul Mann
CFO

14

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Excluded Exhibits: The following exhibits have been excluded from this document as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

Exhibits A – Master Lease

Exhibit B – Floor Plan

15

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSENT OF MASTER LANDLORD

DOC-MOB AUGUSTA II, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (the “Master Landlord”), as the landlord under the Master Lease, hereby consents to the subletting of the
Premises  by  Sublandlord  to  Subtenant  pursuant  to  the  Sublease  to  which  this  Consent  is  attached;  provided,  however,  nothing  in  this  Consent  or  in  the  Sublease  shall  (i)
constitute approval or ratification by Master Landlord of any of the terms or provisions of the Sublease or constitute a representation or warranty by or on behalf of Master
Landlord;  (ii)  waive  or  release  Sublandlord  from  any  of  Sublandlord’s  obligations,  agreements  or  liabilities  under  the  Master  Lease  and  Sublandlord  is  and  shall  remain
primarily  liable  for  all  rent,  additional  rent  and  charges  incurred  with  respect  to  the  Premises  and  under  the  Master  Lease  and  for  the  full  performance  of  all  covenants,
obligations and conditions set forth in the Master Lease (including, without limitation, all insurance and indemnity obligations, all surrender obligations, the obligation to cure
any default under or breach of the Master Lease (whether such default is caused by Sublandlord or Subtenant) and the obligation to make all payments under the Master Lease);
(iii) modify, waive, amend or affect any of the terms, provisions, covenants or conditions of the Master Lease or any rights or remedies of Master Landlord thereunder; or (iv)
expand the rights of Sublandlord beyond the rights specifically granted to Sublandlord in the Master Lease. In addition, in no event shall Master Landlord be deemed to be in
privity  of  contract  with  Subtenant  or  owe  any  obligation  or  duty,  under  the  Master  Lease,  the  Sublease  or  otherwise,  to  Subtenant,  and  Master  Landlord  shall  be  under  no
obligation  to  collect  rent  from  Subtenant  (even  though  Master  Landlord  may  have  the  right  to  do  so,  in  which  case  Master  Landlord  reserves  the  right  to  do  so  in  Master
Landlord’s sole discretion). Consent by Master Landlord to the Sublease shall not operate as a waiver of Master Landlord’s rights to consent to any subsequent assignments or
sublettings, Landlord specifically reserving such right.

MASTER LANDLORD:

DOC-MOB AUGUSTA II, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company

By:

/s/ Frank Mullins
Frank Mullins, Manager

16

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Name

PolarityTE, Inc.
PolarityTE MD, Inc.
Arches Research, Inc.
Utah CRO Services, Inc.
IBEX Preclinical Research, Inc.
IBEX Property, LLC

List of Subsidiaries

State of Formation

  Nevada
  Nevada
  Nevada
  Nevada
  Nevada
  Nevada

Exhibit 21.1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration  Statements  of  PolarityTE,  Inc.  on  Form  S-3  (Nos.  333-234280  and  333-229584)  and  Form  S-8  (Nos.  333-
227721, 333-225264, 333-203501, 333-211959 and 333-200841) of our reports dated March 12, 2020, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements as of December 31,
2019 and 2018, for the year ended December 31, 2019, the transition period from November 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, and the year ended October 31, 2018, and the
effectiveness of PolarityTE, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, which reports are included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K to be filed
on or about March 12, 2020. Our report includes an explanatory paragraph that refers to a change in the method of accounting for leases due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02 -
Leases. Our report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, expresses an adverse opinion because of material
weaknesses.

Exhibit 23.1

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP

EISNERAMPER LLP
Iselin, NJ
March 12, 2020

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, David Seaburg, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PolarityTE, Inc.;

CERTIFICATION

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in

light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,

results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-

15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 (f) and 15 (d)-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;

b)  designed  such  internal  control  over  financing  reporting,  or  caused  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure

controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the  registrant’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the  registrant’s  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control over
the financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors

and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect

the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant’s  internal  controls  over  financial

reporting.

Date: March 12, 2020

/s/ David Seaburg
President
(Principal Executive Officer)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Richard Hague, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PolarityTE, Inc.;

CERTIFICATION

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in

light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,

results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-

15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 (f) and 15 (d)-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;

b)  designed  such  internal  control  over  financing  reporting,  or  caused  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure

controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the  registrant’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the  registrant’s  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control over
the financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors

and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect

the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant’s  internal  controls  over  financial

reporting.

Date: March 12, 2020

/s/ Richard Hague
Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EXHIBIT 31.3

I, Paul Mann, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PolarityTE, Inc.;

CERTIFICATION

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in

light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,

results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-

15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 (f) and 15 (d)-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;

b)  designed  such  internal  control  over  financing  reporting,  or  caused  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure

controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the  registrant’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the  registrant’s  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control over
the financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors

and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect

the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant’s  internal  controls  over  financial

reporting.

Date: March 12, 2020

/s/ Paul Mann
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, the undersigned officers of PolarityTE, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to such officers’

knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2019 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Exhibit 32.1

Date: March 12, 2020

/s/ Richard Hague
Richard Hague
Chief Operating Officer

/s/ David Seaburg
David Seaburg
President

/s/ Paul Mann
Paul Mann
Chief Financial Officer