THE DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP INC.
ANNUAL REPORT
US GAAP FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR 2017 FISCAL YEAR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ................ 3
OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 5
CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS ....................................................................................................... 9
QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS ................................................................................................ 15
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................ 17
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND GUARANTEES .......................................................................... 20
OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA ...................................................................................................... 21
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES ............................................................................ 22
CHANGE IN / INITIAL ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES ................................................................. 25
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES ..................................................................................................... 27
TRENDS / BUSINESS OUTLOOK ................................................................................................... 28
CERTAIN FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS ...................................................................... 31
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING ........ 43
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ............................................................................................... 50
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ................................................................................. 51
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ......................................................... 52
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY ................................................................... 53
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS................................................................................. 54
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ........................................................................... 55
CORPORATE INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 89
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”)
contains references to Descartes using the words “we,” “us,” “our” and similar words and the reader is
referred to using the words “you,” “your” and similar words.
This MD&A also refers to our fiscal years. Our fiscal year commences on February 1st of each year and
ends on January 31st of the following year. Our current fiscal year, which ended on January 31, 2017, is
referred to as the “current fiscal year,” “fiscal 2017,” “2017” or using similar words. Our previous fiscal
year, which ended on January 31, 2016, is referred to as the “previous fiscal year,” “fiscal 2016,” “2016”
or using similar words. Other fiscal years are referenced by the applicable year during which the fiscal
year ends. For example, 2018 refers to the annual period ending January 31, 2018 and the “fourth quarter
of 2018” refers to the quarter ending January 31, 2018.
This MD&A, which is prepared as of March 8, 2017, covers our year ended January 31, 2017, as compared
to years ended January 31, 2016 and 2015. You should read the MD&A in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements for 2017. We prepare and file our consolidated financial statements and
MD&A in United States (“US”) dollars and in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles
(“GAAP”). All dollar amounts we use in the MD&A are in US currency, unless we indicate otherwise.
We have prepared the MD&A with reference to the Form 51-102F1 MD&A disclosure requirements
established under National Instrument 51-102 “Continuous Disclosure Obligations” (“NI 51-102”) of the
Canadian Securities Administrators.
Additional information about us, including copies of our continuous disclosure materials such as our annual
information form, is available on our website at http://www.descartes.com, through the EDGAR website
at http://www.sec.gov or through the SEDAR website at http://www.sedar.com.
Certain statements made in this Annual Report to Shareholders, including, but not limited to, statements
in the “Trends / Business Outlook” section and statements regarding our expectations concerning future
revenues and earnings, including potential variances from period to period; our expectations regarding
the cyclical nature of our business; mix of revenues between services revenues and license revenues and
potential variances from period to period; our plans to focus on generating services revenues yet to
continue to allow customers to elect to license technology in lieu of subscribing to services; our expected
loss of revenues and customers; our baseline calibration; our ability to keep our operating expenses at a
level below our baseline revenues; our future business plans and business planning process; allocation of
purchase price for completed acquisitions; our expectations regarding future restructuring charges and
cost-reduction activities; expenses, including amortization of intangible assets and stock-based
compensation; goodwill impairment tests and the possibility of future impairment adjustments; capital
expenditures; acquisition-related costs; our liability with respect to various claims and suits arising in the
ordinary course; any commitments referred to in the “Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees”
section of this MD&A; our intention to actively explore future business combinations and other strategic
transactions; our liability under indemnification obligations; our reinvestment of earnings of subsidiaries
back into such subsidiaries; our dividend policy; the sufficiency of capital to meet working capital, capital
expenditure, debt repayment requirements and our anticipated growth strategy; our ability to raise
capital; our adoption of certain accounting standards and other matters related thereto constitute forward-
looking information for the purposes of applicable securities laws (“forward-looking statements”). When
used in this document, the words “believe,” “plan,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “continue,” “may,”
“will,” “should” or the negative of such terms and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-
looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based
on assumptions that may cause future results to differ materially from those expected. The material
assumptions made in making these forward-looking statements include the following: global shipment
volumes continuing to increase at levels consistent with the average growth rates of the global economy;
countries continuing to implement and enforce existing and additional customs and security regulations
3
relating to the provision of electronic information for imports and exports; countries continuing to
implement and enforce existing and additional trade restrictions and sanctioned party lists with respect to
doing business with certain countries, organizations, entities and individuals; our continued operation of
a secure and reliable business network; the stability of general economic and market conditions, currency
exchange rates, and interest rates; equity and debt markets continuing to provide us with access to
capital; our continued ability to identify and source attractive and executable business combination
opportunities; our ability to develop solutions that keep pace with the continuing changes in technology,
and our continued compliance with third party intellectual property rights. While management believes
these assumptions to be reasonable under the circumstances, they may prove to be inaccurate. Such
forward-looking statements also involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that
may cause our actual results, performance or achievements of, or developments in our business or
industry, to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements or developments
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to,
the factors discussed under the heading “Certain Factors That May Affect Future Results” in this MD&A
and in other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Ontario Securities
Commission and other securities commissions across Canada from time to time. If any of such risks
actually occur, they could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations. In that case, the trading price of our common shares could decline, perhaps materially.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date made. Forward-looking statements are provided for the purpose of providing
information about management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are
cautioned that such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. Except as required by
applicable law, we do not undertake or accept any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates
or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in our expectations or any change in
events, conditions, assumptions or circumstances on which any such statements are based.
4
OVERVIEW
of
Our
solutions
processes.
shipments;
logistics-intensive
We use data, technology and networks to simplify
complex business processes. We’re primarily
focused on logistics and supply chain management
business
are
predominantly cloud-based and are focused on
improving the productivity, performance and
security
businesses.
Customers use our modular, software-as-a-service
(“SaaS”) solutions to route, schedule, track and
measure delivery resources; plan, allocate and
execute
rate, audit and pay
transportation invoices; access and leverage global
trade and restricted party data; file customs and
security documents for imports and exports;
research and perform trade tariff and duty
calculations and complete numerous other logistics
processes by participating in a large, collaborative
logistics community. Our pricing
multi-modal
model provides our customers with flexibility in
purchasing our solutions either on a subscription,
transactional or perpetual license basis. Our
primary
transportation
is on serving
providers (air, ocean and truck modes), logistics
service providers (including third-party logistics
providers, freight forwarders and customs brokers)
and distribution-intensive companies for which
delivery is either a key or a defining part of their
own product or service offering, or for which our
solutions provide an opportunity to reduce costs
and improve service levels by optimizing the use of
their assets.
focus
The Market
Logistics is the management of the flow of
resources between a point of origin and a point of
destination – processes that move items (such as
goods, people, information) from point A to point
B. Supply chain management is broader than
logistics and includes the sourcing, procurement,
for
conversion and
consumption by an enterprise. Logistics and supply
chain management have been evolving over the
past several years as companies are increasingly
seeking automation and real-time control of their
supply chain activities. We believe companies are
looking for integrated solutions for managing
inventory in transit, conveyance units, people and
business documents.
storage of
resources
We believe logistics-intensive organizations are
seeking to reduce operating costs, differentiate
5
trade and
themselves, improve margins, and better serve
customers. Global
transportation
processes are often manual and complex to
manage. This is a consequence of the growing
number of business partners participating in
companies’ global supply chains and a lack of
standardized business processes.
Additionally, global sourcing, logistics outsourcing,
imposition of additional customs and regulatory
requirements and the increased rate of change in
day-to-day business requirements are adding to
the overall complexities that companies face in
planning and executing in their supply chains.
Whether a shipment is delayed at the border, a
customer changes an order or a breakdown occurs
on the road, there are increasingly more issues that
can significantly impact the execution of fulfillment
schedules and associated costs.
frequently
end-customers
These challenges are heightened for suppliers that
have
demanding
narrower order-to-fulfillment periods, lower prices
and greater
scheduling and
rescheduling deliveries. End customers also want
real-time updates on delivery status, adding
considerable burden to supply chain management
as process efficiency is balanced with affordable
service.
flexibility
in
In this market, the movement and sharing of data
between parties involved in the logistics process is
equally important to the physical movement of
goods. Manual,
fragmented and distributed
logistics solutions are often proving inadequate to
address the needs of operators. Connecting
manufacturers and suppliers to carriers on an
individual, one-off basis is too costly, complex and
risky for organizations dealing with many trading
partners. Further, many of these solutions do not
provide the
flexibility required to efficiently
accommodate varied processes for organizations to
remain competitive. We believe this presents an
opportunity for logistics technology providers to
unite this highly fragmented community and help
customers improve efficiencies in their operations.
As the market continues to change, we’ve been
evolving to meet our customers’ needs. While the
rate of adoption of newer logistics and supply chain
management technologies is increasing, a large
number of organizations still have manual business
processes. We have been educating our prospects
and customers on the value of connecting to
trading partners through our Global Logistics
Network (“GLN”) and automating, as well as
standardizing, multi-party business processes. We
believe that our target customers are increasingly
looking for a single source, neutral, network-based
solution provider who can help them manage the
end-to-end shipment process, which
involves
planning a shipment, booking transportation,
tracking the shipment as it moves, managing
regulatory compliance filings during the move and,
finally, settling and auditing of transportation
invoices.
and
helps
regulatory
technology
competitive. Our
Additionally,
initiatives mandating
electronic filing of shipment information with
customs authorities require companies to automate
aspects of their shipping processes to remain
customs
compliant
compliance
shippers,
transportation providers, freight forwarders and
other logistics intermediaries to securely and
electronically
tariff/duty
information with customs authorities and self-audit
their own efforts. Our technology also helps
efficiently
carriers
coordinate with customs brokers and agencies to
expedite cross-border shipments. While many
compliance initiatives started in the US, compliance
has now become a global issue with significantly
more international shipments crossing several
borders on the way to their final destinations.
shipment and
forwarders
freight
and
file
Solutions
Descartes’ Logistics Technology Platform unites a
growing global community of logistics-focused
parties, allowing them to transact business while
leveraging a broad array of applications designed
thrive.
to help
Descartes’ Logistics Technology Platform is the
simple, elegant synthesis of a network, applications
and a community.
logistics-intensive businesses
The Logistics Technology Platform fuses our GLN,
an extensive logistics network covering multiple
transportation modes, with a broad array of
modular, interoperable web and wireless logistics
management
to help
accelerate time-to-value and increase productivity
and performance for businesses of all sizes, the
Logistics Technology Platform leverages the GLN’s
to enable
multimodal
companies to quickly and cost-effectively connect
and collaborate.
solutions. Designed
community
logistics
Descartes’ GLN, the underlying foundation of the
Logistics Technology Platform, manages the flow of
data and documents that track and control
inventory, assets and people in motion. Designed
6
expressly for logistics operations, it is native to the
particularities of different transportation modes
and country borders. As a state-of-the-art
messaging network with wireless capabilities, the
GLN helps manage business processes in real-time
and in-motion. Its capabilities go beyond logistics,
supporting common commercial
transactions,
regulatory compliance documents, and customer
specific needs.
The GLN extends its reach using interconnect
agreements with other general and logistics-
specific networks, to offer companies access to a
wide array of trading partners. With the flexibility
to connect and collaborate in unique ways,
companies can effectively route or transform data
to and from partners and deploy additional
Descartes solutions on the GLN. The GLN allows
“low tech” partners to act and respond with “high
tech” capabilities and connect to the transient
partners that exist in many logistics operations.
This inherent adaptability creates opportunities to
develop logistics business processes that can help
customers differentiate themselves from their
competitors.
Descartes’ Logistics Application Suite offers a wide
array of modular, cloud-based, interoperable web
and wireless logistics management applications.
These solutions embody Descartes’ deep domain
expertise, not merely “check box” functionality.
These solutions deliver value for a broad range of
logistics intensive organizations, whether they
purchase transportation, run their own fleet,
operate globally or locally, or work across air,
transportation. Descartes’
ocean or ground
comprehensive suite of solutions includes:
• Routing, Mobile and Telematics;
• Transportation Management
and
e-
commerce enablement;
• Customs & Regulatory Compliance;
• Trade Data;
• Global Logistics Network Services; and
• Broker & Forwarder Enterprise Systems.
The Descartes applications forming part of the
Logistics Technology Platform are modular and
interoperable to allow organizations the flexibility
to deploy them quickly within an existing portfolio
of solutions.
is streamlined
Implementation
because these solutions use web-native or wireless
user interfaces and are pre-integrated with the
GLN. With interoperable and multi-party solutions,
Descartes’ solutions are designed to deliver
functionality
logistics
operation’s performance and productivity both
that can enhance a
Standard Collaborative Interfaces, which provide a
wide variety of connectivity mechanisms to
integrate a broad spectrum of applications and
services.
Descartes has partnering
multiple parties across
categories:
relationships with
three
following
the
• Technology Partners – Complementary
and
hardware,
embedded
that
extend the functional breadth of Descartes’
solution capabilities;
• Consulting Partners
network,
software,
technology providers
- Large system
resource
integrators
planning system vendors
to
vertically specialized or niche consulting
organizations
domain
expertise and/or implementation services
for Descartes’ solutions; and
enterprise
through
provide
that
and
• Channel Partners (Value-Added Resellers) –
Organizations that market, sell, implement
and support Descartes' solutions to extend
access and expand market share into
territories and markets where Descartes
might not have a focused direct sales
presence.
Marketing
Our marketing efforts are focused on growing
demand
for our solutions and establishing
Descartes as a thought leader and innovator across
the markets we serve. Marketing programs are
delivered through integrated initiatives designed to
reach our target customer and prospect groups.
include digital and online
These programs
marketing, trade shows and user group events,
partner-focused campaigns, and direct corporate
marketing efforts.
within the organization and across a complex
network of partners.
Descartes’ GLN community members enjoy
extended command of operations and accelerated
time-to-value relative to many alternative logistics
solutions. Given the inter-enterprise nature of
logistics, quickly gaining access to partners is
paramount. For this reason, Descartes has focused
on growing a community that strategically attracts
and retains relevant logistics parties. Upon joining
the GLN community, many companies find that a
number of their trading partners are already
members with an existing connection to the GLN.
This helps to minimize the time required to
logistics management
integrate Descartes’
applications and
results.
to begin
Descartes is committed to continuing to expand
community membership. Companies that join the
GLN community or extend their participation find a
single place where their entire logistics network can
exist regardless of the range of transportation
modes, the number of trading partners or the
variety of regulatory agencies.
realizing
Sales and Distribution
Our sales efforts are primarily directed towards two
specific customer markets: (a) transportation
companies and logistics service providers; and (b)
manufacturers, retailers, distributors and mobile
business service providers. Our sales staff is
regionally based and trained to sell across our
solutions to specific customer markets. In North
America and Europe, we promote our products
primarily through direct sales efforts aimed at
existing and potential users of our products. In the
Asia Pacific, Indian subcontinent, South America
and African regions, we focus on making our
channel partners successful. Channel partners for
include
our other
distributors, alliance partners and value-added
resellers.
international operations
United by Design
Descartes’ ‘United By Design’ strategic alliance
program is intended to ensure complementary
hardware, software and network offerings are
interoperable with Descartes’ solutions and work
together seamlessly to solve multi-party business
problems.
‘United By Design’ is intended to create a global
logistics-intensive organizations
ecosystem of
working together to standardize and automate
business processes and manage resources in
motion. The program centers on Descartes’ Open
7
On October 12, 2016, we acquired Appterra LLC
(“Appterra”), a US-based provider of cloud-based
business-to-business supply chain
integration
solutions. Appterra’s solutions help its customers
connect electronically, automate supply chain
processes, and enhance collaboration and visibility
among global trading partners. The total purchase
price for the acquisition was $5.7 million, net of
cash acquired, which was funded with cash on
hand. Additional contingent consideration of up to
$1.6 million in cash is payable if certain revenue
performance targets are met by Appterra in the two
years following the acquisition. The fair value of the
contingent consideration was valued at $0.7 million
at the acquisition date.
On November 11, 2016, we acquired 4Solutions
Information Technology Pty Ltd. (“4Solutions”), an
Australia-based provider of cloud-based business-
to-business supply chain integration solutions.
4Solutions operates the Health Supply Network, an
electronic document exchange network for the
healthcare community, which allows large multi-
national, local pharmaceutical manufacturers and
wholesalers connect and collaborate to automate a
wide array of supply chain processes. The total
acquisition was
purchase
approximately $2.5 million, net of cash acquired,
which was funded with cash on hand.
price
the
for
collects,
cleanses
America,
On December 23, 2016, we acquired The
Datamyne Inc. (“Datamyne”), a provider of cloud-
based trade data content solutions for customers
to analyze import and export trade activity.
Datamyne, primarily operating in the U.S. and
and
South
commercializes logistics trade data from over 50
nations across five continents, including key
markets in North America, Latin America, Asia,
Africa, and the European Union. Subscribers use
Datamyne’s web‐based solutions and business
intelligence tools to augment, speed up and
simplify trade data research, and to shape global
marketing, prospecting, and sourcing strategies.
for the acquisition was
The purchase price
approximately $52.5 million, net of cash acquired,
which was funded with cash on hand.
Fiscal 2017 Highlights
On March 2, 2016, Descartes amended
its
revolving debt facility with a new senior secured
credit facility. The credit facility consists of a
$150.0 million revolving operating credit facility to
be available
for general corporate purposes
including the financing of ongoing working capital
needs and acquisitions. The credit facility also
provides for an additional $7.5 million available to
support
interest rate
hedging. The credit facility has a five-year maturity
with no fixed repayment dates prior to the end of
the five-year term. Borrowings under the credit
facility are secured by a first charge over
substantially all of Descartes’ assets. The credit
facility contains certain customary representations,
warranties and guarantees, and covenants.
foreign exchange and
(v) warrants; and
On April 18, 2016, we filed a final short-form base
shelf prospectus, allowing us to offer and issue the
following securities: (i) common shares; (ii)
preferred shares; (iii) senior or subordinated
(iv) subscription
unsecured debt securities;
receipts;
(vi) securities
comprised of more than one of the aforementioned
common shares, preferred shares, debt securities,
subscription receipts and/ or warrants offered
together as a unit. These securities may be offered
separately or together, in separate series, in
amounts, at prices and on terms to be set forth in
one or more shelf prospectus supplements. The
aggregate initial offering price of securities that
may be sold by us (or certain of our current or
future shareholders) pursuant to our base shelf
prospectus during the 25-month period that our
base shelf prospectus, including any amendments
thereto, remains valid is limited to $500 million.
The short-form base shelf prospectus expires on
May 18, 2018.
On April 29, 2016, we acquired pixi* Software
GmbH (“Pixi”), a Germany-based provider of
technology solutions
for e-commerce order
fulfilment and warehouse management. Pixi’s
solutions help its customers automate e-commerce
processes originating from online orders, and Pixi
is currently integrated with hundreds of e-
commerce sites in Europe. The total purchase price
for the acquisition was approximately $10.6
million, net of cash acquired, which was funded by
drawing on our credit facility. The draw on the
credit facility has subsequently been repaid.
8
CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
The following table shows, for the fiscal years indicated, our results of operations in millions of dollars
(except per share and weighted average share amounts):
Year ended
Total revenues
Cost of revenues
Gross margin
Operating expenses
Other charges
Amortization of intangible assets
Income from operations
Investment income
Interest expense
Income before income taxes
Income tax expense
Current
Deferred
Net income
EARNINGS PER SHARE
BASIC
DILUTED
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING (thousands)
BASIC
DILUTED
OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
Total assets
Non-current financial liabilities
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
170.9
2016
185.0
203.8
2017
56.1
147.7
53.9
131.1
54.8
116.1
83.6
3.5
30.0
30.6
1.4
(0.6)
31.4
4.0
3.6
23.8
75.3
1.5
26.2
28.1
0.2
(0.5)
27.8
1.4
5.8
20.6
68.8
2.9
21.7
22.7
0.3
(1.1)
21.9
2.8
4.0
15.1
0.31
0.31
0.27
0.27
0.21
0.21
75,800
76,515
75,595
76,409
70,559
71,584
500.5
452.8
444.2
-
-
-
Total revenues consist of services revenues and license revenues. Services revenues are principally
comprised of the following: (i) ongoing transactional fees for use of our services and products by our
customers, which are recognized as the transactions occur; (ii) professional services revenues from
consulting, implementation and training services related to our services and products, which are
recognized as the services are performed; (iii) maintenance, subscription and other related revenues,
including revenues associated with maintenance and support of our services and products, which are
recognized ratably over the subscription period; and (iv) hardware revenues, which are recognized when
hardware is shipped. License revenues are derived from perpetual licenses granted to our customers to
use our software products, which are recognized when the license is delivered.
9
The following table provides additional analysis of our services and license revenues (in millions of dollars
and as a percentage of total revenues) generated over each of the periods indicated:
Year ended
Services revenues
Percentage of total revenues
License revenues
Percentage of total revenues
Total revenues
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
159.1
93%
2017
196.9
97%
2016
176.3
95%
6.9
3%
203.8
8.7
5%
185.0
11.8
7%
170.9
Our services revenues were $196.9 million, $176.3 million and $159.1 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. The increase in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to the inclusion of a full period of
services revenues from the fiscal 2016 acquisitions of MK Data Services LLC (“MK Data”), BearWare Inc.
(“BearWare”) and Oz Development Inc. (“Oz”) as well as a partial period of services revenues from the
fiscal 2017 acquisitions of Pixi, Appterra, 4Solutions and Datamyne. Services revenues in 2017 were
negatively impacted by the weakening of the British pound sterling, Canadian dollar and Norwegian krone
compared to the US dollar. This negative impact was partially offset by the strengthening of the euro
compared to the US dollar.
The increase in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to the inclusion of a full period of services
revenues from the acquisitions of Computer Management USA, Inc. and Computer Management NA, Inc.
(collectively, “Computer Management”), Customs Info LLC (“Customs Info”), Airclic Inc. (“Airclic”), e-
customs Inc. (“e-customs”) and Pentant Limited (“Pentant”), as well as a partial period of services
revenues from the fiscal 2016 acquisitions of MK Data, BearWare and Oz. Services revenues in 2016 were
negatively impacted by the weakening of the euro, Canadian dollar, Norwegian krone, British pound
sterling and Swedish krona compared to the US dollar.
Our license revenues were $6.9 million, $8.7 million and $11.8 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. While our sales focus has been on generating services revenues in our SaaS business model,
we have continued to see a market for licensing the products in our omni-channel retailing and home
delivery logistics solutions. The amount of license revenues in a period is dependent on our customers’
preference to license our solutions instead of purchasing our solutions as a service and we anticipate
variances from period to period.
As a percentage of total revenues, our services revenues were 97%, 95% and 93% in 2017, 2016 and
2015, respectively. Our high percentage of services revenues reflects our emphasis on selling to new
customers and expanding product offerings to existing customers under our SaaS business model.
10
We operate in one business segment providing logistics technology solutions. The following table provides
additional analysis of our revenues by geographic location of customer (in millions of dollars and as a
percentage of total revenues):
Year Ended
United States
Percentage of total revenues
Europe, Middle-East and Africa (“EMEA”)
Percentage of total revenues
Canada
Percentage of total revenues
Asia Pacific
Percentage of total revenues
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
73.8
43%
2017
106.7
52%
2016
96.3
52%
75.2
37%
13.2
7%
8.7
4%
68.5
37%
12.6
7%
7.6
4%
72.9
44%
15.2
9%
9.0
5%
Total revenues
203.8
185.0
170.9
Revenues from the United States were $106.7 million, $96.3 million and $73.8 million in 2017, 2016
and 2015, respectively. The increase in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily a result of the inclusion of
a full period of United States-based revenues from the acquisitions of MK Data, BearWare and Oz as well
as the 2017 acquisitions of Appterra and Datamyne.
The increase in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily a result of United States-based revenue from the
acquisitions of Computer Management, Customs Info, Airclic, MK Data, BearWare and Oz.
Revenues from the EMEA region were $75.2 million, $68.5 million and $72.9 million in 2017, 2016 and
2015, respectively. The increase in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily a result of the inclusion of
revenue from the 2017 acquisition of Pixi as well as increased transactional and subscription revenues.
Revenues were also positively impacted by the strengthening of the euro compared to the US dollar. The
increases were partially offset by the weakening of the Norwegian krone and British pound sterling
compared to the US dollar.
The decrease in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily a result of the weakening of the euro, Norwegian
krone, British pound sterling and Swedish krona compared to the US dollar. The decrease was partially
offset by revenues from the acquisitions of Airclic, e-customs and Pentant as well as a significant license
sale made in the first quarter of 2016.
Revenues from Canada were $13.2 million, $12.6 million and $15.2 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. The increase in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily a result of increased transactional and
professional services revenues. This increase was partially offset by the weakening of the Canadian dollar
compared to the US dollar.
The decrease in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily a result of the weakening of the Canadian dollar
compared to the US dollar.
Revenues from the Asia Pacific region were $8.7 million, $7.6 million and $9.0 million in 2017, 2016
and 2015, respectively. The increase in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily a result of the inclusion of
revenue from the 2017 acquisition of 4Solutions.
The decrease in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily a result of decreased license revenues in the region.
11
The following table provides analysis of cost of revenues (in millions of dollars) and the related gross
margins for the periods indicated:
Year ended
Services
Services revenues
Cost of services revenues
Gross margin
Gross margin percentage
License
License revenues
Cost of license revenues
Gross margin
Gross margin percentage
Total
Revenues
Cost of revenues
Gross margin
Gross margin percentage
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
2017
2016
196.9
55.0
141.9
72%
6.9
1.1
5.8
176.3
52.9
123.4
70%
8.7
1.0
7.7
84%
89%
203.8
56.1
147.7
72%
185.0
53.9
131.1
71%
159.1
53.0
106.1
67%
11.8
1.8
10.0
85%
170.9
54.8
116.1
68%
Cost of services revenues consists of internal costs of running our systems and applications, hardware
costs, and other personnel-related expenses incurred in providing professional service and maintenance
work, including consulting and customer support.
Gross margin percentage for services revenues was 72%, 70% and 67% in 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. The margin in 2017 was positively impacted by inclusion of the acquisitions of Oz, MK Data,
Pixi, and Datamyne which operate at margins higher than our other service revenue streams. The margin
in 2016 was positively impacted by inclusion of the acquisitions of Airclic, e-customs and MK Data which
operate at margins higher than our other service revenue streams.
Cost of license revenues consists of costs related to our sale of third-party technology, such as third-
party map license fees and royalties.
Gross margin percentage for license revenues was 84%, 89% and 85% in 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. Our gross margin on license revenues is dependent on the proportion of our license revenues
that involve third-party technology. Consequently, our gross margin percentage for license revenues is
higher when a lower proportion of our license revenues attracts third-party technology costs, and vice
versa.
Operating expenses consisting of sales and marketing, research and development and general and
administrative expenses, were $83.6 million, $75.3 million and $68.8 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. The increase in 2017 as compared to 2016 was primarily due to operating expenses from
the acquisitions of MK Data, BearWare, Oz, Pixi and, to a lesser extent, Appterra, 4Solutions and
Datamyne. Operating expenses in 2017 were positively impacted on a comparative basis to 2016 by the
weakening of the British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Swedish krona and Norwegian krone compared
to the US dollar.
The increase in 2016 as compared to 2015 was primarily due to operating expenses from the acquisitions
of Customs Info, Airclic, e-customs, BearWare and, to a lesser extent, Computer Management, Pentant,
MK Data, and Oz. Operating expenses in 2016 were positively impacted on a comparative basis to 2015
12
by the weakening of the Canadian dollar, euro, Swedish krona, Norwegian krone, and British pound sterling
compared to the US dollar.
The following table provides analysis of operating expenses (in millions of dollars and as a percentage of
total revenues) for the periods indicated:
Year ended
Total revenues
Sales and marketing expenses
Percentage of total revenues
Research and development expenses
Percentage of total revenues
General and administrative expenses
Percentage of total revenues
Total operating expenses
Percentage of total revenues
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
170.9
2017
203.8
2016
185.0
24.9
12%
35.6
17%
23.1
11%
83.6
41%
22.4
12%
31.3
17%
21.6
12%
75.3
41%
20.4
12%
28.1
16%
20.3
12%
68.8
40%
Sales and marketing expenses include salaries, commissions, stock-based compensation and other
personnel-related costs, bad debt expenses, travel expenses, advertising programs and services, and
other promotional activities associated with selling and marketing our services and products. Sales and
marketing expenses were $24.9 million, $22.4 million and $20.4 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 12% in 2017, 12% in
2016 and 12% in 2015. The increases in sales and marketing expenses in 2017 compared to 2016 was
primarily due to the inclusion of sales and marketing expenses from the acquisitions of Oz, Pixi and
Datamyne. Sales and marketing expenses in 2017 on a comparative basis to 2016 were positively
impacted by the weakening of the Canadian dollar and British pound sterling compared to the US dollar.
The increases in sales and marketing expenses in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to the
inclusion of sales and marketing expenses from the acquisitions of Customs Info and Airclic and additional
expenses related to an increase in the size and format of our annual User Group conference. Sales and
marketing expenses in 2016 on a comparative basis to 2015 were positively impacted by the weakening
of the Canadian dollar, euro, Swedish krona, Norwegian krone and British pound sterling compared to the
US dollar.
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries, stock-based compensation and
other personnel-related costs of technical and engineering personnel associated with our research and
product development activities, as well as costs for third-party outsourced development providers. We
expensed all costs related to research and development in 2017, 2016 and 2015. Research and
development expenses were $35.6 million, $31.3 million and $28.1 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. Research and development expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 17% in 2017,
17% in 2016 and 16% in 2015. The increase in research and development expenses in 2017 compared to
2016 was primarily attributable to increased payroll and related costs from the acquisitions of BearWare,
Oz and Pixi. Research and development expenses in 2017 on a comparative basis to 2016 were positively
impacted by the weakening of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar.
The increase in research and development expenses in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily attributable
to increased payroll and related costs from the acquisitions of Customs Info, Airclic, e-customs, MK Data
and BearWare. Research and development expenses in 2016 on a comparative basis to 2015 were
positively impacted by the weakening of the Canadian dollar and euro compared to the US dollar.
13
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, stock-based compensation and
other personnel-related costs of administrative personnel, as well as professional fees and other
administrative expenses. General and administrative costs were $23.1 million, $21.6 million and $20.3
million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of
total revenues were 11%, 12% and 12% in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase in general
and administrative expenses in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily attributable to the inclusion of
general and administrative expenses from the acquisitions of MK Data, Oz, Pixi and Datamyne. General
and administrative expenses in 2017 on a comparative basis to 2016 were positively impacted by the
weakening of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar.
The increase in general and administrative expenses in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily attributable
to the inclusion of general and administrative expenses from the acquisition of Customs Info. General and
administrative expenses in 2016 were also impacted by an increase in the Descartes share price resulting
in additional expense for deferred share unit compensation costs. General and administrative expenses in
2016 on a comparative basis to 2015 were positively impacted by the weakening of the Canadian dollar
and euro compared to the US dollar.
Other charges consist primarily of acquisition-related costs with respect to completed and prospective
acquisitions, restructuring charges and executive departure charges. Acquisition-related costs primarily
include retention bonuses, advisory services, brokerage services and administrative costs, and relate to
completed and prospective acquisitions. Restructuring costs relate to the integration of previously
completed acquisitions and other cost-reduction activities. Other charges were $3.5 million, $1.5 million
and $2.9 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Other charges included acquisition-related costs
of $3.0 million, $1.4 million and $1.7 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase in other
charges in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily a result of additional acquisition costs related to MK Data
retention bonuses.
The decrease in other charges in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily a result of a reduction in
restructuring and executive departure charges as a result of no new restructuring plans being implemented
during 2016.
Amortization of intangible assets is amortization of the value attributable to intangible assets,
including customer agreements and relationships, non-compete covenants, existing technologies and
trade names, in each case associated with acquisitions completed by us as of the end of each reporting
period. Intangible assets with a finite life are amortized to income over their useful life. The amount of
amortization expense in a fiscal period is dependent on our acquisition activities as well as our asset
impairment tests. Amortization of intangible assets was $30.0 million, $26.2 million and $21.7 million in
2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase in amortization expense over those three years primarily
arose due to amortization expense from the acquisitions of Computer Management, Customs Info, Airclic,
e-customs, Pentant, MK Data, BearWare and Oz, and to a lesser extent, Pixi, Appterra, 4Solutions and
Datamyne. As at January 31, 2017, the unamortized portion of all intangible assets amounted to $145.5
million.
We test the carrying value of our finite life intangible assets for recoverability when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that there may be evidence of impairment. We write down intangible asset or asset
groups with a finite life to fair value when the related undiscounted cash flows are not expected to allow
for recovery of the carrying value. Fair value of intangible asset or asset groups is determined by
discounting the expected related cash flows. No finite life intangible asset or asset group impairment has
been identified or recorded for any of the fiscal periods reported.
Investment income was $1.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The increase in investment income in 2017 compared to 2016 and 2015 was primarily attributable to the
sale of marketable securities in 2017.
14
Interest expense was $0.6 million, $0.5 million and $1.1 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Interest expense arises primarily due to the amount borrowed and outstanding on our credit facility as
well as amortization of deferred financing charges. As of January 31, 2017, all amounts previously
borrowed under the credit facility have been repaid and no amounts remain owing.
Income tax expense is comprised of current and deferred income tax expense. Income tax expense for
2017, 2016 and 2015 was 24%, 26% and 31% of income before income taxes, respectively, with current
income tax expense being 13%, 5% and 13% of income before income taxes, respectively.
Income tax expense – current was $4.0 million, $1.4 million and $2.8 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. Current income taxes arise primarily from income that is not fully sheltered by loss carry-
forwards or other tax attributes. Current tax expense increased in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due
to a $1.7 million increase in expenses not deductible for tax purposes, an increase of $0.7 million
attributable to changes in the estimate of our uncertain tax positions partially offset by an increase of $0.5
million in adjustments in respect to income tax of previous periods. Current tax expense decreased in
2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to a decrease in taxable income in the US as a result of tax benefits
related to stock option exercises.
Income tax expense – deferred was $3.6 million, $5.8 million and $4.0 million in 2017, 2016 and
2015, respectively. Deferred income tax expense decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to
changes in estimates of valuation allowances partially offset by the effect of tax rate reductions against
certain deferred tax assets in EMEA. Deferred income tax expense increased in 2016 compared to 2015
primarily due to additional valuation allowance in EMEA and a tax rate reduction in certain jurisdictions.
Net income was $23.8 million, $20.6 million and $15.1 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS
The following table provides an analysis of our unaudited operating results (in thousands of dollars, except
per share and weighted average number of share amounts) for each of the quarters ended on the date
indicated.
April 30, July 31, October 31, January 31,
2017
2016
2016
2016
Total
2017
Revenues
Gross margin
Operating expenses
Net income
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Weighted average shares outstanding
(thousands):
Basic
Diluted
48,911
35,222
19,806
6,038
0.08
0.08
50,516
36,731
21,197
5,779
0.08
0.08
51,536
37,601
21,287
5,931
0.08
0.08
52,816 203,779
38,174 147,728
21,286 83,576
6,090 23,838
0.31
0.31
0.08
0.08
75,761
76,419
75,792
76,483
75,816
76,538
75,830 75,800
76,577 76,515
15
April 30, July 31, October 31, January 31,
2016
2015
2015
2015
Total
2016
Revenues
Gross margin
Operating expenses
Net income
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Weighted average shares outstanding
(thousands):
Basic
Diluted
44,424
31,041
17,887
4,901
0.06
0.06
45,172
31,683
18,294
5,072
0.07
0.07
47,360
33,944
19,528
5,229
0.07
0.07
48,037 184,993
34,466 131,134
75,324
19,615
20,562
5,360
0.27
0.07
0.27
0.07
75,484
76,344
75,498
76,396
75,633
76,421
75,760
76,423
75,595
76,409
Revenues over the comparative period have been positively impacted by the seven acquisitions that we
have completed since the beginning of fiscal 2016. In addition, over the past two fiscal years we have
seen increased revenues as a result of an increase in transactions processed over our GLN business
document exchange as we help our customers comply with electronic filing requirements of US, Canadian,
EU and Asia security and customs regulations.
Our services revenues continue to have seasonal trends. In the first fiscal quarter of each year, we
historically have seen slightly lower shipment volumes by air and truck which impact the aggregate
number of transactions flowing through our GLN business document exchange. In the second fiscal quarter
of each year, we historically have seen a slight increase in ocean services revenues as ocean carriers are
in the midst of their customer contract negotiation period. In the third fiscal quarter of each year, we have
historically seen shipment and transactional volumes at their highest. In the fourth fiscal quarter of each
year, the various international holidays impact the aggregate number of shipping days in the quarter, and
historically we have seen this adversely impact the number of transactions our network processes and,
consequently, the amount of services revenues we receive during that period.
In the fourth quarter of 2017 revenues and gross margin were positively impacted by the acquisitions of
4Solutions and Datamyne as well as the inclusion of a full quarter of operations from our acquisition of
Appterra. Increased revenues in the fourth quarter were partially offset by the negative impact of the
weakening of the euro, British pound sterling and Swedish krona compared to the US dollar. Operating
expenses in the fourth quarter were positively impacted by the weakening of the euro and Swedish krona
compared to the US dollar. Net income was negatively impacted by additional amortization as a result of
the acquisitions of Appterra, 4Solutions and Datamyne.
In the third quarter of 2017 revenues, gross margin and net income were positively impacted by increased
professional services and transactional revenues. Increased revenues in the third quarter were partially
offset by the negative impact of the weakening of the British pound sterling compared to the US dollar.
Operating expenses in the third quarter were positively impacted by the weakening of the British pound
sterling compared to the US dollar. Net income was negatively impacted by $0.4 million of restructuring
costs in the third quarter of 2017.
In the second quarter of 2017 revenues and net income were positively impacted by the inclusion of a full
quarter of operations from our acquisition of Pixi. Operating expenses in the second quarter were positively
impacted by the weakening of the British pound sterling and Swedish krona compared to the US dollar.
Gross margins and net income continue to be positively impacted by inclusion of the acquisitions of MK
Data and Oz. Net income was also positively impacted by the sale of marketable securities in the quarter
offset by additional amortization as a result of the acquisition of Pixi and stock-based compensation grants
from the first quarter of 2017.
In the first quarter of 2017, revenues and net income were positively impacted by the inclusion of a full
quarter of operations from our acquisition of Oz. Revenues in the first quarter were positively impacted
16
by the strengthening of the euro compared to the US dollar. Gross margins and net income continue to
be positively impacted by inclusion of the acquisitions of MK Data and Oz. Net income was partially offset
by additional amortization as a result of the acquisition of Oz.
In 2016, revenues, gross margins and net income were positively impacted on a comparative basis to
2015 by the inclusion of a full period of operations from our fiscal 2015 acquisitions of Computer
Management USA, Inc. and Computer Management NA, Inc., Customs Info LLC, Airclic Inc., e-customs
Inc. and Pentant Limited as well as the partial period of operations from our fiscal 2016 acquisitions of MK
Data, BearWare and Oz. Revenue growth was partially offset by the negative impact of the weakening of
the euro, Canadian dollar, Norwegian krone, Swedish krona and British pound sterling compared to the
US dollar. Net income was negatively impacted by $1.4 million of acquisition-related costs with respect to
completed and prospective acquisitions as well as restructuring costs of $0.1 million in 2016.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash. We had $38.1 million and $37.2 million in cash as at January 31, 2017 and January 31, 2016,
respectively. All cash was held in interest-bearing bank accounts, primarily with major Canadian, US and
European banks.
Credit facility. On March 2, 2016, we amended our revolving debt facility with a new senior secured
credit facility. The credit facility consists of a $150.0 million revolving operating credit facility to be
available for general corporate purposes including the financing of ongoing working capital needs and
acquisitions. The credit facility also provides for an additional $7.5 million available to support foreign
exchange and interest rate hedging. The credit facility has a five-year maturity with no fixed repayment
dates prior to the end of the five-year term. Borrowings under the credit facility are secured by a first
charge over substantially all of Descartes’ assets. Depending on the type of advance, interest rates under
the revolving operating portion of the credit facility are based on the Canada or US prime rate, Bankers’
Acceptance (BA) or London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus an additional 0 to 200 basis points based
on the ratio of net debt to adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as
defined in the credit agreement. A standby fee of between 20 to 28 basis points will be charged on all
undrawn amounts. The credit facility contains certain customary representations, warranties and
guarantees, and covenants. As of January 31, 2017, $150.0 million of the revolving operating credit facility
remains available for use. No amounts have been drawn on the facility available to support foreign
exchange and interest rate hedging. We are in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility as of
January 31, 2017.
Short-form base shelf prospectus. On April 18, 2016, we filed a final short-form base shelf prospectus,
allowing us to offer and issue the following securities: (i) common shares; (ii) preferred shares; (iii) senior
or subordinated unsecured debt securities; (iv) subscription receipts; (v) warrants; and (vi) securities
comprised of more than one of the aforementioned common shares, preferred shares, debt securities,
subscription receipts and/ or warrants offered together as a unit. These securities may be offered
separately or together, in separate series, in amounts, at prices and on terms to be set forth in one or
more shelf prospectus supplements. The aggregate initial offering price of securities that may be sold by
us (or certain of our current or future shareholders) pursuant to our base shelf prospectus during the 25-
month period that our base shelf prospectus, including any amendments thereto, remains valid is limited
to $500 million. The short-form base shelf prospectus expires on May 18, 2018.
Working capital. As at January 31, 2017, our working capital (current assets less current liabilities) was
$18.7 million. Current assets primarily include $38.1 million of cash, $25.4 million of current trade
receivables and $5.1 million of prepaid assets. Current liabilities primarily include $23.7 million of deferred
revenue, $23.2 million of accrued liabilities and $4.7 million of accounts payable. Our working capital has
decreased since January 31, 2016 by $16.2 million, primarily due to cash used in the acquisitions of Pixi,
17
Appterra, 4Solutions and Datamyne, and partially offset by cash generated from operations during the
period.
Historically, we have financed our operations and met our capital expenditure requirements primarily
through cash flows provided from operations, issuances of common shares and proceeds from debt. We
anticipate that, considering the above, we have sufficient liquidity to fund our current cash requirements
for working capital, contractual commitments, capital expenditures and other operating needs. We also
believe that we have the ability to generate sufficient amounts of cash in the long term to meet planned
growth targets and to fund strategic transactions. Should additional future financing be undertaken, the
proceeds from any such transaction could be utilized to fund strategic transactions or for general corporate
purposes. We expect, from time to time, to continue to consider select strategic transactions to create
value and improve performance, which may include acquisitions, dispositions, restructurings, joint
ventures and partnerships, and we may undertake further financing transactions, including draws on our
credit facility or equity offerings, in connection with any such potential strategic transaction.
With respect to earnings of our non-Canadian subsidiaries, our intention is that these earnings will be
reinvested in each subsidiary indefinitely. Of the $38.1 million of cash as at January 31, 2017, $32.7
million was held by our foreign subsidiaries, most significantly in the United States with lesser amounts
held in other countries in the EMEA and Asia Pacific regions. To date, we have not encountered significant
legal or practical restrictions on the abilities of our subsidiaries to repatriate money to Canada, even if
such restrictions may exist in respect of certain foreign jurisdictions where we have subsidiaries. In the
future, if we elect to repatriate the unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries in the form of dividends,
or if the shares of the foreign subsidiaries are sold or transferred, then we could be subject to additional
Canadian or foreign income taxes, net of the impact of any available foreign tax credits, which would result
in a higher effective tax rate. We have not provided for foreign withholding taxes or deferred income tax
liabilities related to unremitted earnings of our non-Canadian subsidiaries, since such earnings are
considered permanently invested in those subsidiaries, or are not subject to withholding taxes.
The table set forth below provides a summary of cash flows for the periods indicated in millions of dollars:
Year ended
Cash provided by operating activities
Purchase of marketable securities
Sale of marketable securities
Additions to property and equipment
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired and bank
indebtedness assumed
Proceeds from borrowing on credit facility
Credit facility repayments
Payment of debt issuance costs
Issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs
Settlement of stock options
Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash
Net change in cash
Cash, beginning of period
Cash, end of period
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
49.5
-
-
(2.7)
(82.2)
2016
54.2
(4.7)
-
(4.3)
(120.9)
2017
72.6
(0.2)
6.1
(4.9)
(71.3)
10.8
(10.2)
(1.0)
0.1
-
(1.1)
0.9
37.2
38.1
-
-
-
0.2
(2.6)
(2.8)
(80.9)
118.1
37.2
20.0
(63.3)
(0.4)
140.7
(0.4)
(5.8)
55.4
62.7
118.1
Cash provided by operating activities was $72.6 million, $54.2 million and $49.5 million for 2017,
2016 and 2015, respectively. For 2017, the $72.6 million of cash provided by operating activities resulted
from $23.8 million of net income, plus adjustments for $38.7 million of non-cash items included in net
income and plus $10.1 million of cash provided from changes in our operating assets and liabilities. For
2016, the $54.2 million of cash provided by operating activities resulted from $20.6 million of net income,
18
plus adjustments for $36.5 million of non-cash items included in net income and less $2.9 million of cash
used from changes in our operating assets and liabilities. For 2015, the $49.5 million of cash provided by
operating activities resulted from $15.1 million of net income, plus adjustments for $30.5 million of non-
cash items included in net income and plus $3.9 million of cash provided from changes in our operating
assets and liabilities.
Cash provided by operating activities increased in 2017 compared to 2016, primarily due to a $13.0 million
increase in cash generated from changes in our operating assets and liabilities. Cash provided by operating
activities increased in 2016 compared to 2015, primarily due to net income adjusted for non-cash
expenses which increased $11.5 million.
Purchase of marketable securities was $0.2 million, $4.7 million and nil for 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively.
Sale of marketable securities was $6.1 million, nil and nil for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Additions to property and equipment were $4.9 million, $4.3 million and $2.7 million in 2017, 2016
and 2015, respectively. Additions to property and equipment were greater in 2017 as compared to 2016
and 2015 as a result of additional investments in computing equipment and software to support our
network and build out our security infrastructure.
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired was $71.3 million, $120.9 million and $82.2 million
in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Acquisitions in 2017 related to Pixi, Appterra, 4Solutions and
Datamyne. Acquisitions in 2016 related to MK Data, BearWare and Oz. Acquisitions in 2015 related to
Computer Management, Customs Info, Airclic, e-customs and Pentant.
Proceeds from borrowing on credit facility of $10.8 million, nil and $20.0 million in 2017, 2016 and
2015, respectively, were a result of borrowings on our credit facility to finance our 2017 acquisition of Pixi
and 2015 acquisition of Customs Info.
Credit facility repayments of $10.2 million, nil and $63.3 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively,
relate to principal repayments on our credit facility and repayment of debt acquired from the acquisition
Customs Info.
Payment of debt issuance costs of $1.0 million, nil and $0.4 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015,
respectively, relate to costs paid in establishing and amending the terms of our credit facility agreement.
Issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs of $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $140.7 million in
2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The $0.1 million in 2017 was a result of the exercise of employee
stock options partially offset by costs paid to file the short-form base shelf prospectus. The $0.2 million in
2016 was a result of the exercise of employee stock options. The $140.7 million in 2015 was primarily a
result of the public share offering.
Settlement of stock options of nil, $2.6 million and $0.4 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively,
was a result of the settlement of tandem stock appreciation rights exercised upon the surrender of stock
options.
19
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND GUARANTEES
Commitments
To facilitate a better understanding of our commitments, the following information is provided (in millions
of dollars) in respect of our operating obligations as of January 31, 2017:
Less than
1 year
1-3 years 4-5 years More than
5 years
Operating lease obligations
Capital lease obligations
Total
4.9
0.1
5.0
5.7
0.1
5.8
1.5
-
1.5
0.8
-
0.8
Total
12.9
0.2
13.1
Lease Obligations
We are committed under non-cancelable operating leases for business premises, computer equipment and
vehicles with terms expiring at various dates through 2026. We are also committed under non-cancelable
capital leases for computer equipment expiring at various dates through 2021. The future minimum
amounts payable under these lease agreements are presented in the table above.
Other Obligations
Deferred Share Unit (“DSU”) and Cash-settled Restricted Share Unit (“CRSU”) Plans
As discussed in the “Trends / Business Outlook” section later in this MD&A and in Note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements, we maintain DSU and CRSU plans for our non-employee directors and employees.
Any payments made pursuant to these plans are settled in cash. For DSUs and CRSUs, the units vest over
time and the liability recognized at any given consolidated balance sheet date reflects only those units
vested at that date that have not yet been settled in cash. As such, we had an unrecognized aggregate
amount for the unvested CRSUs of $0.9 million at January 31, 2017. As at January 31, 2017 there were
no unvested DSUs. The ultimate liability for any payment of DSUs and CRSUs is dependent on the trading
price of our common shares. To partially offset our exposure to fluctuations in our stock price, we have
entered into equity derivative contracts, including floating-rate equity forwards.
Contingencies
We are subject to a variety of other claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course
of our business. The consequences of these matters are not presently determinable but, in the opinion of
management after consulting with legal counsel, the ultimate aggregate liability is not currently expected
to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.
Product Warranties
In the normal course of operations, we provide our customers with product warranties relating to the
performance of our hardware, software and network services. To date, we have not encountered material
costs as a result of such obligations and have not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in our
consolidated financial statements.
Business combination agreements
In respect of our acquisition of Appterra in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, up to $1.6 million in cash may
become payable if certain revenue performance targets are met by Appterra in the two years following
the acquisition. A balance of $0.7 million is accrued related to this contingent consideration as at January
31, 2017.
20
Guarantees
In the normal course of business, we enter into a variety of agreements that may contain features that
meet the definition of a guarantee under ASC Topic 460, “Guarantees”. The following lists our significant
guarantees:
Intellectual property indemnification obligations
We provide indemnifications of varying scope to our customers against claims of intellectual property
infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products. In the event of such a claim, we
are generally obligated to defend our customers against the claim and we are liable to pay damages and
costs assessed against our customers that are payable as part of a final judgment or settlement. These
intellectual property infringement indemnification clauses are not generally subject to any dollar limits and
remain in force for the term of our license and services agreements with our customers, where license
terms are typically perpetual. To date, we have not encountered material costs as a result of such
indemnifications.
Other indemnification agreements
In the normal course of operations, we enter into various agreements that provide general indemnities.
These indemnities typically arise in connection with purchases and sales of assets, securities offerings or
buy-backs, service contracts, administration of employee benefit plans, retention of officers and directors,
membership agreements, customer financing transactions, and leasing transactions. In addition, our
corporate by-laws provide for the indemnification of our directors and officers. Each of these indemnities
requires us, in certain circumstances, to compensate the counterparties for various costs resulting from
breaches of representations or obligations under such arrangements, or as a result of third party claims
that may be suffered by the counterparty as a consequence of the transaction. We believe that the
likelihood that we could incur significant liability under these obligations is remote. Historically, we have
not made any significant payments under such indemnities.
In evaluating estimated losses for the guarantees or indemnities described above, we consider such factors
as the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of
the amount of loss. We are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount
payable under such guarantees or indemnities as many of these arrangements do not specify a maximum
potential dollar exposure or time limitation. The amount also depends on the outcome of future events
and conditions, which cannot be predicted. Given the foregoing, to date, we have not accrued any liability
in our financial statements for the guarantees or indemnities described above.
OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA
We have an unlimited number of common shares authorized for issuance. As of March 8, 2017, we had
75,874,684 common shares issued and outstanding.
At the annual meeting of shareholders held on May 26, 2016, the shareholders of the Corporation approved
the addition of 4,500,000 options to the Corporation’s stock option plan. As of March 8, 2017, there were
526,321 options issued and outstanding, and 4,546,332 remaining available for grant under all stock
option plans.
As of March 8, 2017, there were 337,647 performance share units (“PSUs”) and 263,235 restricted share
units (“RSUs”) issued and outstanding, and 181,843 remaining available for grant under all performance
and restricted share unit plans.
On November 30, 2004, we announced that our board of directors had adopted a shareholder rights plan
(the “Rights Plan”) to ensure the fair treatment of shareholders in connection with any take-over offer,
and to provide our board of directors and shareholders with additional time to fully consider any unsolicited
take-over bid. We did not adopt the Rights Plan in response to any specific proposal to acquire control of
21
the Company. The Rights Plan was approved by the TSX and was originally approved by our shareholders
on May 18, 2005. The Rights Plan took effect as of November 29, 2004. On May 29, 2008, our shareholders
approved certain amendments to the Rights Plan and approved the Rights Plan continuing in effect. At our
annual shareholders meeting held on May 29, 2014, our shareholders approved certain amendments to
the Rights Plan and approved the Rights Plan continuing in effect. The Rights Plan will expire at the
termination of our annual shareholders’ meeting in calendar year 2017 unless its continued existence is
ratified by the shareholders before such expiration. We understand that the Rights Plan is similar to plans
adopted by other Canadian companies and approved by their shareholders.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are
affected by management’s application of accounting policies. Estimates are deemed critical when a
different estimate could have reasonably been used or where changes in the estimates are reasonably
likely to occur from period to period and would materially impact our financial condition or results of
operations. Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial
statements for 2017 included in our 2017 Annual Report.
Our management has discussed the development, selection and application of our critical accounting
policies with the audit committee of the board of directors.
The following discusses the critical accounting estimates and assumptions that management has made
under these policies and how they affect the amounts reported in the fiscal 2017 consolidated financial
statements:
Revenue recognition
We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue realized or
realizable and earned when there exists persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product has been
delivered or the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and
collectability is reasonably assured.
In recognizing revenue, we make estimates and assumptions on factors such as the probability of
collection of the receivable from the customer, the amount of revenue to allocate to individual elements
in a multiple element arrangement, the selling price and other matters. We make these estimates and
assumptions using our past experience, taking into account any other current information that may be
relevant. These estimates and assumptions may differ from the actual outcome for a given customer which
could impact operating results in a future period.
Impairment of long-lived assets
We test long-lived asset or asset groups, such as property and equipment and finite life intangible assets,
for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. An
impairment loss is recognized when the estimate of undiscounted future cash flows generated by such
asset or asset groups is less than the carrying amount. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on
the present value of the expected future cash flows. Our impairment analysis contains estimates due to
the inherent uncertainty relating to forecasting long-term estimated cash flows and determining the
ultimate useful lives of asset or asset groups. Actual results will differ, which could materially impact our
impairment assessment.
Goodwill
We test for impairment of goodwill at least annually on October 31st of each year and at any other time
if any event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce our fair value below
22
our carrying amount. Our operations are analyzed by management and our chief operating decision maker
as being part of a single industry segment providing logistics technology solutions. Accordingly, our
goodwill impairment assessment is based on the allocation of goodwill to a single reporting unit.
We will perform further quarterly analysis of whether any event has occurred that would more likely than
not reduce our fair value below our carrying amounts and, if so, we will perform a goodwill impairment
test between the annual date. Any future impairment adjustment will be recognized as an expense in the
period that the adjustment is identified.
Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting
units, assigning assets and liabilities to reporting units, assigning goodwill to reporting units, assessing
qualitative factors and determining the fair value of each reporting unit. Significant judgments are required
to estimate the fair value of reporting units and include estimating future cash flows, determining
appropriate discount rates and other assumptions. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could
materially affect the determination of fair value and/or goodwill impairment for each reporting unit.
Stock-based compensation plans
Stock Options
We maintain stock option plans for non-employee directors, officers, employees and other service
providers. Options to purchase our common shares are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair
market value of our common shares as of the date of grant. This fair market value is determined using
the closing price of our common shares on the TSX on the day immediately preceding the date of the
grant.
Employee stock options generally vest over a five-year period starting from the grant date and expire
seven years from the grant date. Non-employee directors’ and officers’ stock options generally have
quarterly vesting over a three- to five-year period. We issue new shares from treasury upon the exercise
of a stock option.
The fair value of employee stock option grants that are ultimately expected to vest are amortized to
expense in our consolidated statement of operations based on the straight-line attribution method. The
fair value of stock option grants is calculated using the Black-Scholes Merton option-pricing model.
Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of our common stock and other factors. The risk-free
interest rates are based on Government of Canada average bond yields for a period consistent with the
expected life of the option in effect at the time of the grant. The expected option life is based on the
historical life of our granted options and other factors.
Performance & Restricted Share Units
We maintain a performance and restricted share unit plan pursuant to which certain of our officers are
eligible to receive grants of performance share units and restricted share units.
PSUs vest at the end of a three-year performance period. The ultimate number of PSUs that vest is based
on the total shareholder return (“TSR”) of our Company relative to the TSR of companies comprising a
peer index group. TSR is calculated based on the weighted-average closing price of shares for the five
trading days preceding the beginning and end of the performance period. The fair value of PSUs is
expensed to stock-based compensation expense over the vesting period. PSUs expire ten years from the
grant date. New shares are issued from treasury upon the redemption of a PSU.
PSUs are measured at fair value estimated using a Monte Carlo Simulation approach. Expected volatility
is based on historical volatility of our common stock and other factors. The risk-free interest rates are
based on the Government of Canada average bond yields for a period consistent with the expected life of
the PSUs at the time of the grant. The expected PSU life is based on the historical life of our stock options
and other factors.
RSUs vest annually over a three-year period starting from the grant date and expire ten years from the
grant date. We issue new shares from treasury upon the redemption of an RSU.
23
RSUs are measured at fair value based on the closing price of our common shares for the day preceding
the date of the grant and will be expensed to stock-based compensation expense over the vesting period.
Deferred Share Unit Plan
Our board of directors adopted a deferred share unit plan effective as of June 28, 2004, pursuant to which
non-employee directors are eligible to receive grants of deferred share units, each of which has an initial
value equal to the weighted-average closing price of our common shares for the five trading days
preceding the grant date. The plan allows each director to choose to receive, in the form of DSUs, all,
none or a percentage of the eligible director’s fees which would otherwise be payable in cash. If a director
has invested less than the minimum amount of equity in Descartes, as prescribed from time to time by
the board of directors, then the director must take at least 50% of the base annual fee for serving as a
director in the form of DSUs. Each DSU fully vests upon award but is distributed only when the director
ceases to be a member of the board of directors. Vested units are settled in cash based on our common
share price when conversion takes place. Fair value of the liability is based on the closing price of our
common shares at the balance sheet date.
Cash-Settled Restricted Share Unit Plan
Our board of directors adopted a cash-settled restricted share unit plan effective as of May 23, 2007,
pursuant to which certain of our employees and non-employee directors are eligible to receive grants of
CRSUs, each of which has an initial value equal to the weighted-average closing price of our common
shares for the five trading days preceding the date of the grant. The CRSUs generally vest based on
continued employment and have annual vesting over three- to five-year periods. Vested units are settled
in cash based on our common share price when conversion takes place, which is within 30 days following
a vesting date and in any event prior to December 31st of the calendar year in which a vesting date
occurs. Fair value of the liability is based on the closing price of our common shares at the balance sheet
date.
Income Taxes
We have provided for income taxes based on information that is currently available to us. Tax filings are
subject to audits, which could materially change the amount of deferred income tax assets and liabilities.
We record deferred tax assets on our consolidated balance sheet for tax benefits that we currently expect
to realize in future periods. Over recent years, we have determined that there was sufficient positive
evidence such that it was more likely than not that we would utilize all or a portion of deferred tax assets
in certain jurisdictions, to offset taxable income in future periods. This positive evidence included that we
have earned cumulative income, after permanent differences, in each of these jurisdictions in at least the
current and two preceding tax years. As such, over recent years, we have reduced our valuation
allowances by amounts which represent the amount of tax loss carry forwards that we project will be used
to offset taxable income in these jurisdictions over the foreseeable future. In making the projection for
the period, we made certain assumptions, including the following: (i) that there will be continued customer
migration from technology platforms owned by foreign jurisdictions to a technology platform owned by
another entity in our corporate group; and (ii) that tax rates in these jurisdictions will be consistent over
the period of projection. Any further change to increase or decrease the valuation allowance for the
deferred tax assets would result in an income tax expense or income tax recovery, respectively, on the
consolidated statements of operations.
Business Combinations
In connection with business acquisitions that we have completed, we identify and estimate the fair value
of net assets acquired, including certain identifiable intangible assets (other than goodwill) and liabilities
assumed in the acquisitions. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net
assets acquired is assigned to goodwill. Intangible assets include customer agreements and relationships,
non-compete covenants, existing technologies and trade names. Our initial allocation of purchase price is
generally preliminary in nature and may not be final for up to one year from the date of acquisition.
Changes to the estimates and assumptions used in determining our purchase price allocation may result
in material differences depending on the size of the acquisition completed.
24
CHANGE IN / INITIAL ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest
(Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03
simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs. ASU 2015-03 is effective for annual periods, and interim
periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, which was our fiscal year
beginning February 1, 2016. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-05, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other
– Internal Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing
Arrangement” (“ASU 2015-05”). ASU 2015-05 provides guidance about whether a cloud computing
arrangement includes a software license. ASU 2015-05 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods
within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, which was our fiscal year beginning
February 1, 2016. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The adoption of
this standard did not have a material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial
Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 2015-40)” (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 requires an entity’s
management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements
are issued. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual
periods and interim periods thereafter, which is our fiscal year ended January 31, 2017. The Company
adopted this guidance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The adoption of this amendment did not have
a material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with
Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). This update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic
605, "Revenue Recognition" and nearly all other existing revenue recognition guidance under US GAAP.
The core principal of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are
transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for
those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-14 which
defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for one year. ASU 2014-09 is now effective for annual periods,
and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which will be our
fiscal year beginning February 1, 2018. Early adoption as of the original effective date of ASU 2014-09 is
permitted. When applying ASU 2014-09 we can either apply the amendments: (i) retrospectively to each
prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients as defined within ASU
2014-09 or (ii) retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at
the date of initial application and providing certain additional disclosures as defined within ASU 2014-09.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)”
(“ASU 2016-08”). ASU 2016-08 amends the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to clarify the implementation
guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards
Update 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance
Obligations and Licensing” (“ASU 2016-10”). ASU 2016-10 amends the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to clarify
the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and licensing. In May 2016, the FASB
issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606):
Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU 2016-12”). ASU 2016-12 amends the
guidance in ASU 2014-09 to clarify the implementation guidance on collectibility, presentation of sales
taxes, noncash consideration, completed contracts and contract modifications. In December 2016, the
25
FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic
606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2016-20”). ASU 2016-20 affects narrow aspects of
the guidance issued in 2014-09. We continue to review our existing policies, differences between existing
policies and the new standard, ensuring our data collection is appropriate and communicating the
upcoming changes with various stakeholders. As a result, we are continuing to assess the impact that the
above-mentioned ASUs will have on our results of operations, financial position and disclosures. Although
it is expected to have an impact on our revenue recognition policies and disclosures, we have not yet
selected a transition method nor have we determined when we will adopt the standard and the effect of
the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.
In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying
the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 provides guidance to more clearly
articulate the requirements for the measurement and disclosure of inventory. ASU 2015-11 is effective for
annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016,
which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2017. The Company will adopt this guidance in the first
quarter of fiscal 2018. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our
results of operations or disclosures.
In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, “Financial Instruments—Overall
(Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-
01”). ASU 2016-01 supersedes the guidance to classify equity securities with readily determinable fair
values into different categories reducing the number of items that are recognized in other comprehensive
income as well as simplifying the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily
determinable fair values. ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those
annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1,
2018. The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The adoption of this
amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU
2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 supersedes the lease guidance in ASC Topic 840, “Leases” and requires the
recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases.
ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning
after December 15, 2018, which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2019. The Company will
adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. The adoption of this standard is expected to increase
assets and liabilities, as we will be required to record a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease
liability in our consolidated financial statements, as well as a decrease to operating costs, an increase to
finance costs (due to accretion of the lease liability) and an increase to depreciation and amortization (due
to amortization of the right-of-use asset).
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock
Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-
09”). ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting and presentation of share-based compensation. ASU 2016-
09 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after
December 15, 2016, which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted.
The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The adoption of this amendment
is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit
Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-
13 requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held. ASU 2016-
13 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after
December 15, 2019, which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted.
The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2021 and is currently evaluating the
impact that the adoption will have on its results of operations, financial position and disclosures.
26
In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic
230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 clarifies
the presentation and classification in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual
periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which will
be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this
guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a
material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740):
Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory” (“ASU 2016-16”). ASU 2016-16 requires the
recognition of the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory
when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those
annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1,
2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019.
The adoption of this standard will result in the write-off of the balance of unamortized deferred tax charges
and the recognition of previously unrecognized deferred tax assets in certain jurisdictions.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic
805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a
business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of
assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual
periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2018.
Early adoption is not permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019.
The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or
disclosures.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and
Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04
simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual
periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2019, which will
be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this
guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2021. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a
material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, management evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings) as of January
31, 2017. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and
Interim Filings) as of January 31, 2017, based on criteria established in “Internal Control – Integrated
Framework” (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on the assessment, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
January 31, 2017, the design and operation of our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
During the period beginning on November 1, 2016 and ended on January 31, 2017, no changes were
made to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
27
TRENDS / BUSINESS OUTLOOK
This section discusses our outlook for fiscal 2018 and in general as of the date of this MD&A, and contains
forward-looking statements.
Our business may be impacted from time to time by the general cyclical and seasonal nature of particular
modes of transportation and the freight market in general, as well as the cyclical and seasonal nature of
the industries that such markets serve. Factors which may create cyclical fluctuations in such modes of
transportation or the freight market in general include legal and regulatory requirements, timing of
contract renewals between our customers and their own customers, seasonal-based tariffs, vacation
periods applicable to particular shipping or receiving nations, weather-related events that impact shipping
in particular geographies and amendments to international trade agreements. Since some of our revenues
from particular products and services are tied to the volume of shipments being processed, adverse
fluctuations in the volume of global shipments or shipments in any particular mode of transportation may
adversely affect our revenues. Declines in shipment volumes would likely have a material adverse effect
on our business.
Industry consolidation, rapid technological change and frequent new product introductions and
enhancements continue to characterize the software and network services industries – particularly for
logistics management technology companies. Organizations are increasingly requiring greater levels of
functionality and more sophisticated product offerings from their software and services providers.
Increased importance is being placed on leveraging cloud-based technology to better manage logistics
processes and to connect and collaborate with trading partners on a global basis, as well as to reuse and
share supply chain data in order to accelerate time-to-value. Cloud-based technology also enables
business networks to more easily unite and integrate services provided by a broad range of partners and
technology alliances to extend functionality and further enhance collaboration between business
communities. As a result, we believe there is a trend away from using manual and paper-based supply
chain and logistics processes towards electronic processes powered by the exchange of electronic
information between logistics and supply chain participants.
Accordingly, we expect that our future success will be dependent upon our ability to enhance current
products or develop and introduce new products offering enhanced performance and new functionality at
competitive prices. In particular, we believe customers are looking for end-to-end solutions that combine
a multi-modal, multi-process network with business document exchange and wireless mobile resource
management (“MRM”) applications with end-to-end global trade compliance and collaborative supply chain
execution applications. These applications include freight bookings, contract and rate management,
classification of goods for tariff and duty purposes, sanctioned party screening, customs filings and
electronic shipment manifest processes, transportation management, routing and scheduling, purchase
order to dock door processes, and inventory visibility.
We believe that there continues to be a growing acceptance of subscription pricing and SaaS business
models in the markets we serve that provide lower up-front cost and easier-to-maintain alternatives than
may be available through traditional perpetual license pricing models. In fiscal 2017, our services revenues
comprised 97% of our total revenues, with the balance being license revenues. We expect that our focus
in fiscal 2018 will remain on generating services revenues, primarily by promoting the use of our GLN
(including customs compliance services) and the migration of customers using our legacy license-based
products to our services-based architecture. We anticipate maintaining the flexibility to license our
products to those customers who prefer to buy the products in that fashion and the composition of our
revenues in any one quarter between services revenues and license revenues will be impacted by the
buying preferences of our customers.
28
We have significant contracts with our license customers for ongoing support and maintenance, as well as
significant service contracts which provide us with recurring services revenues. After their initial term, our
service contracts are generally renewable at a customer’s option, and there are generally no mandatory
payment obligations or obligations to license additional software or subscribe for additional services. For
fiscal 2018, based on our historic experience, we anticipate that over a one-year period we may lose
approximately 4% to 6% of our aggregate annualized recurring revenues in the ordinary course. This
includes the loss of recurring revenue from our contract to operate the U.S. Census Bureau’s Automated
Export System, AESDirect, as Census has now completed the transition of users of the AESDirect system
to a new system operated by U.S. Customs & Border Protection. While the revenue from the Census
contract represented approximately 1% of our aggregate revenues in fiscal 2017, there can be no
assurance that we will be able to replace it or any other lost revenue with new sources of recurring revenue
from new customer relationships or from existing customers.
We internally measure and manage our “baseline calibration,” a non-GAAP financial measure, which we
define as the difference between our “baseline revenues” and “baseline operating expenses”. We define
our “baseline revenues,” a non-GAAP financial measure, as our visible, recurring and contracted revenues.
Baseline revenues are not a projection of anticipated total revenues for a period as they exclude any
anticipated or expected new sales for a period beyond the date that the baseline revenues are measured.
We define our “baseline operating expenses,” a non-GAAP financial measure, as our total expenses less
interest, investment income, taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation (for which
we include related costs and taxes), acquisition-related costs and restructuring charges. Baseline
operating expenses are not a projection of anticipated total expenses for a period as they exclude any
expenses associated with anticipated or expected new sales for a period beyond the date that the baseline
expenses are measured. Our baseline calibration is not a projection of net income for a period as
determined in accordance with GAAP, or adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization for a period as it excludes anticipated or expected new sales for a period beyond the date
that the baseline calibration is measured, excludes any costs of goods sold or other expenses associated
with such new sales, and excludes the expenses identified as excluded in the definition of “baseline
operating expenses,” above. We calculate and disclose “baseline revenues,” “baseline operating expenses”
and “baseline calibration” because management uses these metrics in determining its planned levels of
expenditures for a period and we believe this information is useful to our investors. However, because
these metrics are limited estimated operating metrics that do not have comparable GAAP measures, we
are unable to provide quantitative reconciliations of these measures to GAAP measures without
unreasonable efforts and accordingly are omitting this information. These metrics are estimated operating
metrics and not projections, nor actual financial results, and are not indicative of current or future
performance. These metrics do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and are unlikely to
be comparable to similarly-titled metrics used by other companies and are not a replacement or proxy for
any GAAP measure. At February 1, 2017, using foreign exchange rates of $0.75 to CAD $1.00, $1.05 to
EUR 1.00 and $1.22 to £1.00, we estimated that our baseline revenues for the first quarter of 2018 are
approximately $51.0 million and our baseline operating expenses are approximately $36.0 million. We
consider this to be our baseline calibration of approximately $15.0 million for the first quarter of 2018, or
approximately 29% of our baseline revenues as at February 1, 2017.
We estimate that aggregate amortization expense for existing intangible assets will $27.5 million for 2018,
$25.4 million for 2019, $24.4 million for 2020, $20.9 million for 2021, $17.0 million for 2022 and $30.3
million thereafter, assuming that no impairment of existing intangible assets occurs in the interim and
subject to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
We anticipate that acquisition-related costs related to retention bonuses in fiscal 2018 will be
approximately $0.8 million, conditional on future services rendered by employees.
We anticipate that stock-based compensation expense for fiscal 2018 will be approximately $1.5 million
to $1.7 million, subject to any necessary adjustments resulting from reconciling estimated stock-based
compensation forfeitures to actual stock-based compensation forfeitures.
29
We performed our annual goodwill impairment tests in accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles –
Goodwill and Other” (“ASC Topic 350”) as at October 31, 2016 and determined that there was no evidence
of impairment. We are currently scheduled to perform our next annual impairment test during the third
quarter of fiscal 2018. We will continue to perform quarterly analyses of whether any event has occurred
that would more likely than not reduce our enterprise value below our carrying amounts and, if so, we will
perform a goodwill impairment test between the annual dates. The likelihood of any future impairment
increases if our public market capitalization is adversely impacted by global economic, capital market or
other conditions for a sustained period of time. Any future impairment adjustment will be recognized as
an expense in the period that such adjustment is identified.
In fiscal 2017, capital expenditures were $4.9 million or 2% of revenues, as we continue to invest in
computer equipment and software to support our network and build out our infrastructure. We anticipate
that we will incur approximately $5.0 million to $7.0 million in capital expenditures in fiscal 2018 primarily
related to investments in our network and security infrastructure.
We conduct business in a variety of foreign currencies and, as a result, our foreign operations are subject
to foreign exchange fluctuations. Our businesses operate in their local currency environment and use their
local currency as their functional currency. Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into
US dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses of foreign
operations are translated using daily exchange rates. Translation adjustments resulting from this process
are accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.
Transactions incurred in currencies other than the functional currency are converted to the functional
currency at the transaction date. All foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in net
income. Some of our cash is held in foreign currencies. We currently have no specific hedging program in
place to address fluctuations in international currency exchange rates. We can make no accurate prediction
of what will happen with international currency exchange rates going forward. However, if the US dollar
was to weaken in comparison to foreign currencies, then we anticipate this will increase the expenses of
our business and have a negative impact on our results of operations. By way of illustration, 61% of our
revenues in fiscal 2017 were in US dollars, 19% in euro, 6% in Canadian dollars, 5% in British pound
sterling, and the balance in mixed currencies, while 44% of our operating expenses were in US dollars,
20% in euro, 19% in Canadian dollars, 5% in British pound sterling, and the balance in mixed currencies.
Our tax expense for a period is difficult to predict as it depends on many factors, including the actual
jurisdictions in which income is earned, the tax rates in those jurisdictions, the amount of deferred tax
assets relating to the jurisdictions and the valuation allowances relating to those tax assets. We can
provide no assurance as to the timing or amounts of any income tax expense or recovery, nor can we
provide any assurance that our current valuation allowance for deferred tax assets will not need to be
adjusted further.
We intend to continue to actively explore business combinations to add complementary services, products
and customers to our existing businesses. We also intend to continue to focus our acquisition activities
on companies that are targeting the same customers as us and processing similar data and, to that end,
we listen to our customers’ suggestions as they relate to acquisition opportunities. Depending on the size
and scope of any business combination, or series of business combinations, we may choose or need to
use our existing credit facility or need to raise additional debt or equity capital. However, there can be no
assurance that we will be able to undertake such a financing transaction. If we use debt in connection with
acquisition activity, we will incur additional interest expense from the date of the draw under such facility.
Certain future commitments are set out above in the section of this MD&A called “Commitments,
Contingencies and Guarantees”. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity to fund our current operating
and working capital requirements, including the payment of these commitments.
30
CERTAIN FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
Any investment in us will be subject to risks inherent to our business. Before making an investment
decision, you should carefully consider the risks described below together with all other information
included in this report. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us.
Additional risks and uncertainties that we are not aware of or have not focused on, or that we currently
deem immaterial, may also impair our business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these
risk factors.
If any of the risks actually occur, they could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition,
liquidity or results of operations. In that case, the trading price of our securities could decline and you
may lose all or part of your investment.
We may have difficulties identifying, successfully integrating or maintaining or growing our
acquired businesses.
Businesses that we acquire may sell products or operate services that we have limited experience
operating or managing. We may experience unanticipated challenges or difficulties identifying suitable
acquisition candidates, integrating their businesses into our company, maintaining these businesses at
their current levels or growing these businesses. Factors that may impair our ability to identify,
successfully integrate, maintain or grow acquired businesses may include, but are not limited to:
• Challenges identifying suitable businesses to buy and negotiating the acquisition of those
businesses on acceptable terms;
• Challenges completing the acquisitions within our expected time frames and budgets;
• Challenges in integrating acquired businesses with our business;
•
•
Loss of customers of the acquired business;
Loss of key personnel from the acquired business, such as former executive officers or key
technical personnel;
• Non-compatible business cultures;
•
For regulatory compliance businesses, changes in government regulations impacting electronic
regulatory filings or import/export compliance, including changes in which government
agencies are responsible for gathering import and export information;
• Difficulties in gaining necessary approvals in international markets to expand acquired
businesses as contemplated;
• Our inability to obtain or maintain necessary security clearances to provide international
shipment management services;
• Our failure to make appropriate capital investments in infrastructure to facilitate growth; and
• Other risk factors identified in this report.
We may fail to properly respond to any of these risks, which may have a material adverse effect on our
business results.
Investments in acquisitions and other business initiatives involve a number of risks that could
harm our business.
We have in the past acquired, and in the future expect to seek to acquire, additional products, services,
customers, technologies and businesses that we believe are complementary to ours. For example, in fiscal
2017, we acquired Pixi, Appterra, 4Solutions and Datamyne. In fiscal 2016, we acquired MK Data,
BearWare and Oz. In fiscal 2015 we acquired Computer Management, Customs Info, Airclic, e-customs
and Pentant. We are unable to predict whether or when we will be able to identify any appropriate
products, technologies or businesses for acquisition, or the likelihood that any potential acquisition will be
available on terms acceptable to us or will be completed. We also, from time to time, take on investments
in other business initiatives, such as the implementation of new systems or purchase of marketable
securities.
31
Acquisitions and other business initiatives involve a number of risks, including: substantial investment of
funds, diversion of management’s attention from current operations; additional demands on resources,
systems, procedures and controls; and disruption of our ongoing business. Acquisitions specifically involve
risks, including: difficulties in integrating and retaining all or part of the acquired business, its customers
and its personnel; assumption of disclosed and undisclosed liabilities; dealing with unfamiliar laws,
customs and practices in foreign jurisdictions; and the effectiveness of the acquired company’s internal
controls and procedures. In addition, we may not identify all risks or fully assess risks identified in
connection with an investment. As well, by investing in such initiatives, we may deplete our cash resources
or dilute our shareholder base by issuing additional shares. Furthermore, for acquisitions, there is a risk
that our valuation assumptions, customer retention expectations and our models for an acquired product
or business may be erroneous or inappropriate due to foreseen or unforeseen circumstances and thereby
cause us to overvalue an acquisition target. There is also a risk that the contemplated benefits of an
acquisition or other investment may not materialize as planned or may not materialize within the time
period or to the extent anticipated. The individual or combined effect of these risks could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
Our existing customers might cancel contracts with us, fail to renew contracts on their renewal
dates, and/or fail to purchase additional services and products, and we may be unable to
attract new customers.
We depend on our installed customer base for a significant portion of our revenues. We have significant
contracts with our license customers for ongoing support and maintenance, as well as significant service
contracts that provide recurring services revenues to us. In addition, our installed customer base has
historically generated additional new license and services revenues for us. Service contracts are generally
renewable at a customer’s option and/or subject to cancellation rights, and there are generally no
mandatory payment obligations or obligations to license additional software or subscribe for additional
services.
If our customers fail to renew their service contracts, fail to purchase additional services or products, or
we are unable to attract new customers, then our revenues could decrease and our operating results could
be adversely affected. Factors influencing such contract terminations could include changes in the financial
circumstances of our customers, dissatisfaction with our products or services, our retirement or lack of
support for our legacy products and services, our customers selecting or building alternate technologies
to replace us, the cost of our products and services as compared to the cost of products and services
offered by our competitors, our ability to attract, hire and maintain qualified personnel to meet customer
needs, consolidating activities in the market, and changes in our customers’ business or in regulation
impacting our customers’ business that may no longer necessitate the use of our products or services,
general economic or market conditions, or other reasons. Further, our customers could delay or terminate
implementations or use of our services and products or be reluctant to migrate to new products. Such
customers will not generate the revenues we may have anticipated within the timelines anticipated, if at
all, and may be less likely to invest in additional services or products from us in the future. We may not
be able to adjust our expense levels quickly enough to account for any such revenue losses. In addition,
loss of one or more of our key customers could adversely impact our competitive position in the
marketplace and hurt our credibility and ability to attract new customers.
System or network failures or information security breaches in connection with our services
and products could reduce our sales, impair our reputation, increase costs or result in liability
claims, and seriously harm our business.
We rely on information technology networks and systems to process, transmit and store electronic
information. Any disruption to our services and products, our own information systems or communications
networks or those of third-party providers on which we rely as part of our own product offerings could
result in the inability of our customers to receive our products for an indeterminate period of time. Our
ability to deliver our products and services depends on the development and maintenance of internet
infrastructure by third parties. This includes maintenance of reliable networks with the necessary security,
speed, data capacity and bandwidth. While our services are designed to operate without interruption, we
have experienced, and may in the future experience, interruptions and delays in services and availability
from time to time. In the event of a catastrophic event with respect to one or more of our systems, we
32
may experience an extended period of system unavailability, which could negatively impact our
relationship with customers. Our services and products may not function properly for reasons which may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
System or network failure;
Software errors, failures and crashes;
Interruption in the supply of power;
Virus proliferation or malware;
Communications failures;
Information or infrastructure security breaches;
Insufficient investment in infrastructure;
Earthquakes, fires, floods, natural disasters, or other force majeure events outside our control;
and
Acts of war, sabotage, cyber-attacks, denial-of-service attacks and/or terrorism.
In addition, any disruption to the availability of customer information, or any compromise to the integrity
or confidentiality of customer information in our systems or networks, or the systems or networks of third
parties on which we rely, could result in our customers being unable to effectively use our products or
services or forced to take mitigating actions to protect their information. Back-up and redundant systems
may be insufficient or may fail and result in a disruption of availability of our products or services to our
customers or the integrity or availability of our customers’ information.
Some jurisdictions have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches
involving certain types of personal data and in some cases our agreements with certain customers require
us to notify them in the event of a security incident. Such mandatory disclosures could lead to negative
publicity and may cause our current and prospective customers to lose confidence in the effectiveness of
our data security measures. Moreover, if a high-profile security breach occurs with respect to another
SaaS provider, customers may lose trust in the security of the SaaS business model generally, which could
adversely impact our ability to retain existing customers or attract new ones.
Any actual or perceived threat of disruption to our services or any compromise of customer information
could impair our reputation and cause us to lose customers or revenue, or face litigation, necessitate
customer service or repair work that would involve substantial costs and distract management from
operating our business. Despite the implementation of advanced threat protection, information and
network security measures and disaster recovery plans, our systems and those of third parties on which
we rely may be vulnerable. If we are unable (or are perceived as being unable) to prevent, or promptly
identify and remedy, such outages and breaches, our operations may be disrupted, our business
reputation could be adversely affected, and there could be a negative impact on our financial condition
and results of operations.
Our success depends on our ability to continue to innovate and to create new solutions and
enhancements to our existing products
We may not be able to develop and introduce new solutions and enhancements to our existing products
that respond to new technologies or shipment regulations on a timely basis. If we are unable to develop
and sell new products and new features for our existing products that keep pace with rapid technological
and regulatory change as well as developments in the transportation logistics industry, our business,
results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. We intend to continue to invest
significant resources in research and development to enhance our existing products and services and
introduce new high-quality products that customers will want. If we are unable to predict or quickly react
to user preferences or changes in the transportation logistics industry, or its regulatory requirements, or
if we are unable to modify our products and services on a timely basis or to effectively bring new products
to market, our sales may suffer.
In addition, we may experience difficulties with software or hardware development, design, integration
with third-party software or hardware, or marketing that could delay or prevent our introduction,
deployment or implementation of new solutions and enhancements. The introduction of new solutions by
33
competitors, the emergence of new industry standards or the development of entirely new technologies
to replace existing offerings could render our existing or future solutions obsolete.
We may not have sufficient resources to make the necessary investments in software development and
our technical infrastructure, and we may experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful
development, introduction or marketing of new products or enhancements. In addition, our products or
enhancements may not meet increasingly complex customer requirements or achieve market acceptance
at the rate we expect, or at all. Any failure by us to anticipate or respond adequately to technological
advancements, customer requirements and changing industry standards, or any significant delays in the
development, introduction or availability of new products or enhancements, could undermine our current
market position and negatively impact our business, results of operations or financial condition.
We may not remain competitive. Increased competition could seriously harm our business.
The market for supply chain technology is highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change.
We expect that competition will increase in the future. To maintain and improve our competitive position,
we must continue to develop and introduce in a timely and cost effective manner new products, product
features and network services to keep pace with our competitors. We currently face competition from a
large number of specific market entrants, some of which are focused on specific industries, geographic
regions or other components of markets we operate in.
Current and potential competitors include supply chain application software vendors, customers that
undertake internal software development efforts, value-added networks and business document
exchanges, enterprise resource planning software vendors, regulatory filing companies, trade data
vendors and general business application software vendors. Many of our current and potential competitors
may have one or more of the following relative advantages:
Larger installed base of customers;
• Established relationships with existing customers or prospects that we are targeting;
• Superior product functionality and industry-specific expertise;
• Broader range of products to offer and better product life cycle management;
•
• Greater financial, technical, marketing, sales, distribution and other resources;
• Better performance;
•
• Greater investment in infrastructure;
• Greater worldwide presence;
• Early adoption of, or adaptation to changes in, technology; or
Longer operating history; and/or greater name recognition.
•
Lower cost structure and more profitable operations;
Further, current and potential competitors have established, or may establish, cooperative relationships
and business combinations among themselves or with third parties to enhance their products, which may
result in increased competition. In addition, we expect to experience increasing price competition and
competition surrounding other commercial terms as we compete for market share. In particular, larger
competitors or competitors with a broader range of services and products may bundle their products,
rendering our products more expensive and/or less functional. As a result of these and other factors, we
may be unable to compete successfully with our existing or new competitors.
Disruptions in the movement of freight could negatively affect our revenues.
Our business is highly dependent on the movement of freight from one point to another since we generate
transaction revenues as freight is moved by, to or from our customers. If there are disruptions in the
movement of freight, proper reporting or the overall volume of international shipments, whether as a
result of labor disputes, weather or natural disaster, terrorist events, political instability, changes in cross
border trade agreements, contagious illness outbreaks, or otherwise, then the traffic volume on our Global
Logistics Network will be impacted and our revenues will be adversely affected. As these types of freight
disruptions are generally unpredictable, there can be no assurance that our business, results of operations
and financial condition will not be adversely affected by such events.
34
Changes in the value of the U.S. dollar, as compared to the currencies of other countries where
we transact business, could harm our operating results and financial condition.
Historically, the largest percentage of our revenues has been denominated in U.S. dollars. However, the
majority of our international expenses, including the wages of our non-U.S. employees and certain key
supply agreements, have been denominated in Canadian dollars, euros and other foreign currencies.
Therefore, changes in the value of the U.S. dollar as compared to the Canadian dollar, the euro and other
foreign currencies may materially affect our operating results. We generally have not implemented
hedging programs to mitigate our exposure to currency fluctuations affecting international accounts
receivable, cash balances and inter-company accounts. We also have not hedged our exposure to currency
fluctuations affecting future international revenues and expenses and other commitments. Accordingly,
currency exchange rate fluctuations have caused, and may continue to cause, variability in our foreign
currency denominated revenue streams, expenses, and our cost to settle foreign currency denominated
liabilities.
General economic conditions may affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Demand for our products depends in large part upon the level of capital and operating expenditures by
many of our customers. Decreased capital and operational spending could have a material adverse effect
on the demand for our products and our business, results of operations, cash flow and overall financial
condition. Disruptions in the financial markets may adversely impact the availability of credit already
arranged and the availability and cost of credit in the future, which could result in the delay or cancellation
of projects or capital programs on which our business depends. In addition, disruptions in the financial
markets may also have an adverse impact on regional economies or the world economy, which could
negatively impact the capital and operating expenditures of our customers. These conditions may reduce
the willingness or ability of our customers and prospective customers to commit funds to purchase our
products and services, or their ability to pay for our products and services after purchase.
If we fail to attract and retain key personnel, it would adversely affect our ability to develop
and effectively manage our business.
Our performance is substantially dependent on the performance of our highly qualified management,
technical expertise, and sales and marketing personnel, which we regard as key individuals to our
business. We do not maintain life insurance policies on any of our employees that list Descartes as a loss
payee. Our success is highly dependent on our ability to identify, hire, train, motivate, promote, and retain
key individuals. Significant competition exists for management and skilled personnel. If we fail to cross
train key employees, particularly those with specialized knowledge it could impair our ability to provide
consistent and uninterrupted service to our customers. If we are not able to attract, retain or establish an
effective succession planning program for key individuals it could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition and the price of our common shares.
We have in the past, and may in the future, make changes to our executive management team or board
of directors. There can be no assurance that any such changes and the resulting transition will not have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and the price of our
common shares.
Changes in government filing or screening requirements for global trade may adversely impact
our business.
Our regulatory compliance services help our customers comply with government filing and screening
requirements relating to global trade. The services that we offer may be impacted, from time to time, by
changes in these requirements, including potential future changes as a consequence of the results of the
UK Brexit vote. Changes in requirements that impact electronic regulatory filings or import/export
compliance, including changes adding or reducing filing requirements, changes in enforcement practices
or changes in the government agency responsible for such requirements could adversely impact our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
35
Emergence or increased adoption of alternative sources for trade data may adversely impact
our business.
With recent acquisitions in the area of supplying trade data and content, an increasing portion of our
business relates to the supply of trade data and content that is often used by our customers in other
systems, such as enterprise resource planning systems. Emergence or increased adoption of alternative
sources of this data and content could have an adverse impact on our customers’ needs to obtain this
data and content from us and/or the need for certain of the third party system vendors in this field to
refer customers to us for this data and content, each of which could adversely impact upon the revenues
and income we generate from these areas of our business.
We may have exposure to greater than anticipated tax liabilities or expenses.
We are subject to income and non-income taxes in various jurisdictions and our tax structure is subject
to review by both domestic and foreign taxation authorities and currently has tax audits open in a number
of jurisdictions in which we operate. On a quarterly basis we assess the status of these audits and the
potential for adverse outcomes to determine whether a provision for income and other taxes is
appropriate. The timing of the resolution of income tax audits is highly uncertain, and the amounts
ultimately paid, if any, upon resolution of the issues raised by the taxing authorities may differ from any
amounts that we accrue from time to time. The actual amount of any change could vary significantly
depending on the ultimate timing and nature of any settlements. We cannot currently provide an estimate
of the range of possible outcomes.
The determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires significant
judgment. In the ordinary course of a global business, there are many transactions and calculations where
the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Any audit of our tax filings could materially change the amount of
current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities. We have recorded a valuation allowance against a
portion of our net deferred tax assets. If we achieve a consistent level of profitability, the likelihood of
further reducing our deferred tax valuation allowance for some portion of the losses incurred in prior
periods in one of our jurisdictions will increase. We calculate our current and deferred tax provision based
on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed
during subsequent years. Adjustments based on filed returns are generally recorded in the period when
the tax returns are filed and the global tax implications are known. Our estimate of the potential outcome
for any uncertain tax issue is based on a number of assumptions. Any further changes to the valuation
allowance for our deferred tax assets would also result in an income tax recovery or income tax expense,
as applicable, on the consolidated statements of operations in the period in which the valuation allowance
is changed.
Changes to earnings resulting from past acquisitions may adversely affect our operating
results.
Under ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations”, we allocate the total purchase price to an acquired
company’s net tangible assets, intangible assets and in-process research and development based on their
values as of the date of the acquisition (including certain assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair
value) and record the excess of the purchase price over those values as goodwill. Management’s estimates
of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable but which are inherently uncertain.
After we complete an acquisition, the following factors, among others, could result in material charges
that would adversely affect our operating results and may adversely affect our cash flows:
Impairment of goodwill or intangible assets;
•
• A reduction in the useful lives of intangible assets acquired;
•
Identification of assumed contingent liabilities after we finalize the purchase price allocation
period;
• Charges to our operating results to eliminate certain pre-merger activities that duplicate those
of the acquired company or to reduce our cost structure; and
• Charges to our operating results resulting from revised estimates to restructure an acquired
company’s operations after we finalize the purchase price allocation period.
36
Routine charges to our operating results associated with acquisitions include amortization of intangible
assets, acquisition-related costs and restructuring charges. Acquisition-related costs primarily include
retention bonuses, advisory services, brokerage services and administrative costs with respect to
completed and prospective acquisitions.
We expect to continue to incur additional costs associated with combining the operations of our acquired
companies, which may be substantial. Additional costs may include costs of employee redeployment,
relocation and retention, including salary increases or bonuses, accelerated stock-based compensation
expenses and severance payments, reorganization or closure of facilities, taxes, and termination of
contracts that provide redundant or conflicting services. These costs would be accounted for as expenses
and would decrease our net income and earnings per share for the periods in which those adjustments
are made.
As we continue to increase our international operations we increase our exposure to
international business risks that could cause our operating results to suffer.
While our headquarters are in Canada, we currently have direct operations in the U.S., EMEA, Asia Pacific
and South American regions. We anticipate that these international operations will continue to require
significant management attention and financial resources to localize our services and products for delivery
in these markets, to develop compliance expertise relating to international regulatory agencies, and to
develop direct and indirect sales and support channels in those markets. We face a number of risks
associated with conducting our business internationally that could negatively impact our operating results.
These risks include, but are not limited to:
•
Longer collection time from foreign clients, particularly in the EMEA region and the Asia Pacific
region;
• Difficulty in repatriating cash from certain foreign jurisdictions;
•
Language barriers, conflicting international business practices, and other difficulties related to
the management and administration of a global business;
Increased management, travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs associated with
having international operations;
•
• Difficulties and costs of staffing and managing geographically disparate direct and indirect
operations;
• Volatility or fluctuations in foreign currency and tariff rates;
• Multiple, and possibly overlapping, tax structures;
• Complying with complicated and widely differing global laws and regulations in areas such as
employment, tax, privacy and data protection;
• Trade restrictions;
• Enhanced security procedures and requirements relating to certain jurisdictions;
• The need to consider characteristics unique to technology systems used internationally;
• Economic or political instability in some markets; and
• Other risk factors set out herein.
If we need additional capital in the future and are unable to obtain it or can only obtain it on
unfavorable terms, our operations may be adversely affected, and the market price for our
securities could decline.
Historically, we have financed our operations primarily through cash flows from our operations, the sale
of our equity securities and borrowing under our credit facility. In addition to our current cash and available
debt facilities, we may need to raise additional debt or equity capital to fund expansion of our operations,
to enhance our services and products, or to acquire or invest in complementary products, services,
businesses or technologies. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to undertake
incremental financing transactions. If we raise additional funds through further issuances of convertible
debt or equity securities, our existing shareholders could suffer significant dilution and any new equity
securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those attaching to our common
shares. Our current credit facility contains, and any debt financing secured by us in the future could contain
restrictive covenants relating to our capital-raising activities and other financial and operational matters,
which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities,
including potential acquisitions. In addition, we may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms
37
favorable to us, if at all. If adequate funds are not available on terms favorable or at all, our operations
and growth strategy may be adversely affected and the market price for our common shares could decline.
Increases in fuel prices and other transportation costs may have an adverse effect on the
businesses of our customers resulting in them spending less money with us.
Our customers are all involved, directly or indirectly, in the delivery of goods from one point to another,
particularly transportation providers and freight forwarders. As the costs of these deliveries become more
expensive, whether as a result of increases in fuel costs or otherwise, our customers may have fewer
funds available to spend on our products and services. There can be no assurance that these companies
will be able to allocate sufficient funds to use our products and services. In addition, rising fuel costs may
cause global or geographic-specific reductions in the number of shipments being made, thereby impacting
the number of transactions being processed by our Global Logistics Network and our corresponding
network revenues.
We may not be able to compensate for downward pricing pressure on certain products and
services by increased volumes of transactions or increased prices elsewhere in our business,
ultimately resulting in lower revenues.
Some of our products and services are sold to industries where there is downward pricing pressure on the
particular product or service due to competition, general industry conditions or other causes. If we cannot
offset any such downward pricing pressure, then the particular customer may generate less revenue for
our business or we may have less aggregate revenue. This could have an adverse impact on our operating
results.
Concerns about the environmental impacts of greenhouse gas emissions and global climate
change may result in environmental taxes, charges, regulatory schemes, assessments or
penalties, which could restrict or negatively impact our operations or reduce our profitability.
The impacts of human activity on global climate change have attracted considerable public and scientific
attention, as well as the attention of the U.S. and other governments. Efforts are being made to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption, including those from automobiles and other modes
of transportation. The added cost of any environmental regulation, taxes, charges, assessments or
penalties levied or imposed on our customers in light of these efforts could result in additional costs for
our customers, which could lead them to reduce use of our services. There are also a number of legislative
and environmental regulatory initiatives internationally that could restrict or negatively impact our
operations or increase our costs. Additionally, environmental regulation, taxes, charges, assessments or
penalties could be levied or imposed directly on us. Any enactment of laws or passage of regulations
regarding greenhouse gas emissions by Canada, the U.S., or any other jurisdiction we conduct our
business in, could adversely affect our operations and financial results.
The general cyclical and seasonal nature of the freight market may have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business may be impacted from time to time by the general cyclical and seasonal nature of particular
modes of transportation and the freight market in general, as well as the cyclical and seasonal nature of
the industries that such markets serve. Factors which may create cyclical fluctuations in such modes of
transportation or the freight market in general include legal and regulatory requirements, timing of
contract renewals between our customers and their own customers, seasonal-based tariffs, vacation
periods applicable to particular shipping or receiving nations, weather-related events that impact shipping
in particular geographies and amendments to international trade agreements. Since some of our revenues
from particular products and services are tied to the volume of shipments being processed, adverse
fluctuations in the volume of global shipments or shipments in any particular mode of transportation may
adversely affect our revenues. Declines in shipment volumes would likely have a material adverse effect
on our business.
From time to time, we may be subject to litigation or dispute resolution that could result in
significant costs to us and damage to our reputation.
From time to time, we may be subject to litigation or dispute resolution relating to any number or type of
claims, including claims for damages related to undetected errors or malfunctions of our services and
38
products or their deployment, claims related to previously-completed acquisition transactions or claims
relating to applicable securities laws. Litigation may seriously harm our business because of the costs of
defending the lawsuit, diversion of employees’ time and attention and potential damage to our reputation.
Further, our services and products are complex and often implemented by our customers to interact with
third-party technology or networks. Claims may be made against us for damages properly attributable to
those third-party technologies or networks, regardless of our lack of responsibility for any failure resulting
in a loss, even if our services and products perform in accordance with their functional specifications. We
may also have disputes with key suppliers for damages incurred which, depending on resolution of the
disputes, could impact the ongoing quality, price or availability of the services or products we procure
from the supplier. Limitation of liability provisions in certain third-party contracts may not be enforceable
under the laws of some jurisdictions. As a result, we could be required to pay substantial amounts of
damages in settlement or upon the determination of any of these types of claims, and incur damage to
our reputation and products. The likelihood of such claims and the amount of damages we may be required
to pay may increase as our customers increasingly use our services and products for critical business
functions, or rely on our services and products as the systems of record to store data for use by other
customer applications. Our insurance may not cover potential claims, or may not be adequate to cover all
costs incurred in defense of potential claims or to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed. A
claim brought against us that is uninsured or underinsured could result in unanticipated costs, thereby
harming our operating results and leading analysts or potential investors to lower their expectations of
our performance, which could reduce the trading price of our common shares.
We are dependent on certain key vendors for our inventory of telematics units, which could
impede our development and expansion.
We currently have relationships with a small number of mobile asset unit vendors over which we have no
operational or financial control and no influence in how these vendors conduct their businesses. Suppliers
of mobile asset units could among other things, extend delivery times, raise prices and limit supply due
to their own shortages and business requirements. Interruption in the supply of equipment from these
vendors could delay our ability to maintain, grow and expand our telematics solutions business. If our
relationships with any of these unit vendors were to terminate, there is no guarantee that our remaining
unit vendors would be able to handle the increased equipment supply required to maintain and grow our
expansive networks at our desired rates. There is also no guarantee that business relationships with other
key unit vendors could be entered into on terms desirable or favorable to us, if at all. Fewer key vendors
might mean that existing or potential customers are unable to meaningfully communicate using our Global
Logistics Network, which may cause existing and potential customers to move to competitors’ products.
Such equipment supply issues could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
If we are unable to generate broad market acceptance of our services, products and pricing,
serious harm could result to our business.
We currently derive substantially all of our revenues from our federated network and global logistics
technology solutions and expect to do so in the future. Broad market acceptance of these types of services
and products, and their related pricing, is therefore critical to our future success. The demand for, and
market acceptance of, our services and products is subject to a high level of uncertainty. Some of our
services and products are often considered complex and may involve a new approach to the conduct of
business by our customers. The market for our services and products may weaken, competitors may
develop superior services and products that perform logistics services on a global scale or within a
particular geographic region, or we may fail to develop or maintain acceptable services and products to
address new market conditions, governmental regulations or technological changes. Any one of these
events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our success and ability to compete depend upon our ability to secure and protect patents,
trademarks and other proprietary rights.
We consider certain aspects of our internal operations, products, services and related documentation to
be proprietary, and we primarily rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret
laws and other measures to protect our proprietary rights. Patent applications or issued patents, as well
39
as trademark, copyright, and trade secret rights may not provide adequate protection or competitive
advantage and may require significant resources to obtain and defend. We will also not be able to protect
our intellectual property if we are unable to enforce our rights or if we do not detect unauthorized use of
our intellectual property. Despite our precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy
our products and use information that we regard as proprietary to create products and services that
compete with ours. We also rely on contractual restrictions in our agreements with customers, employees,
outsourced developers and others to protect our intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance
that these agreements will not be breached, that we will have adequate remedies for any breach, or that
our patents, copyrights, trademarks or trade secrets will not otherwise become known. Through an escrow
arrangement, we have granted some of our customers a contingent future right to use our source code
for software products solely for their internal maintenance services. If our source code is accessed through
an escrow, the likelihood of misappropriation or other misuse of our intellectual property may increase.
Moreover, the laws of some countries do not protect proprietary intellectual property rights as effectively
as do the laws of the U.S. and Canada. Protecting and defending our intellectual property rights could be
costly regardless of venue. In order to protect our intellectual property rights, we may be required to
spend significant resources to monitor and protect these rights. Litigation may be necessary in the future
to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope
of the intellectual property rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity.
Litigation brought to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights could be costly, time consuming
and distracting to management and could result in the impairment or loss of portions of our intellectual
property. Furthermore, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights may be met with defenses,
counterclaims and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of our intellectual property rights.
Our inability to protect our proprietary technology against unauthorized copying or use, as well as any
costly litigation or diversion of our management’s attention and resources, could delay further sales or the
implementation of our solutions, impair the functionality of our solutions, delay introductions of new
solutions, result in our substituting inferior or more costly technologies into our solutions, or injure our
reputation.
Claims that we infringe third-party proprietary rights could trigger indemnification obligations
and result in significant expenses or restrictions on our ability to provide our products or
services.
Competitors and other third parties have claimed, and in the future may claim, that our current or future
services or products infringe their proprietary rights or assert other claims against us. Many of our
competitors have obtained patents covering products and services generally related to our products and
services, and they may assert these patents against us. Such claims, whether with or without merit, could
be time consuming and expensive to litigate or settle and could divert management attention from focusing
on our core business.
As a result of such a dispute, we may have to pay damages, incur substantial legal fees, suspend the sale
or deployment of our services and products, develop costly non-infringing technology, if possible, or enter
into license agreements, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Any of these
results would increase our expenses and could decrease the functionality of our services and products,
which would make our services and products less attractive to our current and/or potential customers. We
have agreed in some of our agreements, and may agree in the future, to indemnify other parties for any
expenses or liabilities resulting from claimed infringements of the proprietary rights of third parties. If we
are required to make payments pursuant to these indemnification agreements, such payments could have
a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our results of operations may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and therefore may be
difficult to predict or may fail to meet investment community expectations.
Our results of operations may vary from quarter to quarter in the future due to a variety of factors, many
of which are outside of our control. Such factors include, but are not limited to:
• Volatility or fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
• Volatility or fluctuations in interest rates;
• Timing of acquisitions and related costs;
40
• Timing of restructuring activities;
• The introduction of enhanced products and services from competitors;
• Our ability to introduce new products and updates to our existing products on a timely basis;
• The termination of any key customer contracts, whether by the customer or by us;
• Recognition and expensing of deferred tax assets;
•
Legal costs incurred in bringing or defending any litigation with customers or third-party
providers, and any corresponding judgments or awards;
Legal and compliance costs incurred to comply with regulatory requirements;
Fluctuations in the demand for our services and products;
•
•
• The impact of stock-based compensation expense;
• Price and functionality competition in our industry;
• Changes in legislation and accounting standards;
• Our ability to satisfy contractual obligations in customer contracts and deliver services and
products to the satisfaction of our customers; and
• Other risk factors discussed in this report.
Although our revenues may fluctuate from quarter to quarter, significant portions of our expenses are not
variable in the short term, and we may not be able to reduce them quickly to respond to decreases in
revenues. If revenues are below expectations, this shortfall is likely to adversely and/or disproportionately
affect our operating results. If this occurs, the trading price of our common shares may fall substantially.
Privacy laws and regulations are extensive, open to various interpretations, complex to
implement and may reduce demand for our products, and failure to comply may impose
significant liabilities.
Our customers can use our products to collect, use, process and store information regarding their
shipments. Federal, state and foreign government bodies and agencies may adopt laws and regulations
regarding the collection, use, processing, storage and disclosure of such information obtained from
consumers and individuals. In addition to government regulatory activity, privacy advocacy groups and
the technology industry and other industries may consider various new, additional or different self-
regulatory standards that may place additional burdens directly on our customers and target customers,
and indirectly on us. Our products are expected to be capable of use by our customers in compliance with
such laws and regulations. The functional and operational requirements and costs of compliance with such
laws and regulations may adversely impact our business, and failure to enable our products to comply
with such laws and regulations could lead to significant fines and penalties imposed by regulators, as well
as claims by our customers or third parties. Additionally, all of these domestic and international legislative
and regulatory initiatives could adversely affect our customers’ ability or desire to collect, use, process
and store shipment logistics information, which could reduce demand for our products.
The price of our common shares has in the past been volatile and may also be volatile in the
future.
The trading price of our common shares may be subject to fluctuation in the future. This may make it
more difficult for you to resell your common shares when you want at prices that you find attractive.
Increases in our common share price may also increase our compensation expense pursuant to our
existing director, officer and employee compensation arrangements. We enter into equity derivative
contracts including floating-rate equity forwards to partially offset the potential fluctuations of certain
share-based compensation expenses. Fluctuations in our common share price may be caused by events
unrelated to our operating performance and beyond our control. Factors that may contribute to
fluctuations include, but are not limited to:
• Revenue or results of operations in any quarter failing to meet the expectations, published or
otherwise, of the investment community;
• Changes in recommendations or financial estimates by industry or investment analysts;
• Changes in management or the composition of our board of directors;
• Outcomes of litigation or arbitration proceedings;
• Announcements of technological innovations or acquisitions by us or by our competitors;
•
• Developments with respect to our intellectual property rights or those of our competitors;
Introduction of new products or significant customer wins or losses by us or by our competitors;
41
•
Fluctuations in the share prices of other companies in the technology and emerging growth
sectors;
• General market conditions; and
• Other risk factors set out in this report.
If the market price of our common shares drops significantly, shareholders could institute securities class
action lawsuits against us, regardless of the merits of such claims. Such a lawsuit could cause us to incur
substantial costs and could divert the time and attention of our management and other resources from
our business.
Fair value assessments of our intangible assets required by GAAP may require us to record
significant non-cash charges associated with intangible asset impairment.
Significant portions of our assets, which include customer agreements and relationships, non-compete
covenants, existing technologies and trade names, are intangible. We amortize intangible assets on a
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We review the carrying value of these assets at least
annually for evidence of impairment. In accordance with ASC Topic 360-10-35, “Property, Plant, and
Equipment: Overview: Subsequent Measurement” an impairment loss is recognized when the estimate of
undiscounted future cash flows generated by such assets is less than the carrying amount. Measurement
of the impairment loss is based on the present value of the expected future cash flows. Future fair value
assessments of intangible assets may require impairment charges to be recorded in the results of
operations for future periods. This could impair our ability to achieve or maintain profitability in the future.
If our common share price decreases to a level such that the fair value of our net assets is less
than the carrying value of our net assets, we may be required to record additional significant
non-cash charges associated with goodwill impairment.
We account for goodwill in accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other”, which
among other things, requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at least annually. We have designated
October 31st for our annual impairment test. Should the fair value of our net assets, determined by our
market capitalization, be less than the carrying value of our net assets at future annual impairment test
dates, we may have to recognize goodwill impairment losses in our results of operations in future periods.
This could impair our ability to achieve or maintain profitability in the future.
We have a substantial accumulated deficit and may incur losses in the future.
As at January 31, 2017, our accumulated deficit was $238.5 million, which has been accumulated from
2005 and prior fiscal periods. Although the Company has been profitable since 2005, there can be no
assurance that we will not incur losses again in the future. If we fail to maintain profitability, the market
price of our common shares may decline.
42
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the accompanying consolidated financial statements and all other
information in this Annual Report. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and necessarily include amounts
that reflect management’s judgment and best estimates. Financial information contained elsewhere in this
Annual Report is prepared on a basis consistent with the consolidated financial statements.
The Board of Directors carries out its responsibilities for the consolidated financial statements through its
Audit Committee, consisting solely of independent directors. The Audit Committee meets with
management and the independent auditors to review the consolidated financial statements and internal
controls as they relate to financial reporting. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of
Directors for its consideration in approving the consolidated financial statements for issuance to
shareholders.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of,
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and effected by the Board of Directors, management
and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements on a timely basis.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of January 31, 2017, based on criteria established in “Internal Control – Integrated
Framework” (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on the assessment, management concluded that, as of January 31, 2017, the design and operation
of our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Management’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2017, has been audited by KPMG
LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, who also audited our Consolidated Financial
Statements for the year ended January 31, 2017, as stated in the Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm, which expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of January 31, 2017.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2017, no changes were made to the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
‘Edward J. Ryan’
Edward J. Ryan
Chief Executive Officer
Waterloo, Ontario
‘Allan Brett’
Allan Brett
Chief Financial Officer
Waterloo, Ontario
43
Deloitte LLP
Bay Adelaide East
22 Adelaide Street West, Suite 200
Toronto ON M5H 0A9
Canada
Tel: 416-601-6150
Fax: 416-601-6610
www.deloitte.ca
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
and subsidiaries (the “Company”), which comprise the consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
income (loss), shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended January 31, 2015, and a summary of
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for such
internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We
conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to
fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's
preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting
policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
audit opinion.
44
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements of The Descartes Systems Group Inc. and subsidiaries
present fairly, in all material respects, the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended
January 31, 2015 in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Chartered Professional Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
March 5, 2015
45
KPMG LLP
Bay Adelaide Centre
Suite 4600
333 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2S5
Telephone (416) 777-8500
Fax (416) 777-8818
www.kpmg.ca
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of The Descartes Systems Group Inc.,
which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at January 31, 2017 and January 31, 2016, the consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then
ended, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in
accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles, and for such internal control as management
determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors’ Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In
making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair
presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the
reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for our audit opinion.
46
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of The Descartes Systems Group Inc. as at January 31, 2017 and January 31, 2016, and its
consolidated results of operations and its consolidated cash flows for the years then ended, in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Other Matter
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), The Descartes Systems Group Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2017, based
on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 8, 2017 expressed an
unqualified (unmodified) opinion on the effectiveness of The Descartes Systems Group Inc.’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
March 8, 2017
47
KPMG LLP
Bay Adelaide Centre
Suite 4600
333 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2S5
Telephone (416) 777-8500
Fax (416) 777-8818
www.kpmg.ca
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
We have audited The Descartes Systems Group Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31,
2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Descartes Systems Group Inc.’s
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included under the heading
Management’s Report on Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting in Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended January 31, 2017.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on
our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
48
In our opinion, The Descartes Systems Group Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of January 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated
Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of The Descartes
Systems Group Inc. as of January 31, 2017 and January 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and our
report dated March 8, 2017 expressed an unmodified (unqualified) opinion on those consolidated financial
statements.
Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
March 8, 2017
49
THE DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(US DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS; US GAAP)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash
Short-Term marketable securities (Note 4)
Accounts receivable (net)
Trade (Note 5)
Other (Note 6)
Prepaid expenses and other
Inventory (Note 7)
OTHER LONG-TERM ASSETS
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET (Note 8)
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
DEFERRED TAX CHARGE (Note 18)
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET (Note 9)
GOODWILL (Note 10)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities (Note 11)
Income taxes payable
Deferred revenue
LONG-TERM DEFERRED REVENUE
LONG-TERM INCOME TAXES PAYABLE
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND GUARANTEES (Note 13)
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Note 14)
Common shares – unlimited shares authorized; Shares issued and outstanding totaled
75,874,684 at January 31, 2017 (January 31, 2016 – 75,761,184)
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Accumulated deficit
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Approved by the Board:
January 31,
January 31,
2017
2016
38,135
-
37,213
4,639
25,401
3,709
5,149
167
72,561
1,525
10,447
7,027
422
145,445
263,113
500,540
4,679
23,247
2,170
23,728
53,824
421
5,725
9,975
69,945
25,614
3,131
4,205
155
74,957
468
8,604
16,804
906
133,562
217,486
452,787
4,473
16,844
2,086
16,639
40,042
941
3,672
6,097
50,752
253,242
448,597
(32,779)
(238,465)
430,595
500,540
252,471
446,747
(34,880)
(262,303)
402,035
452,787
‘Eric A. Demirian’
Eric A. Demirian
Chairman of the Board
‘Edward J. Ryan’
Edward J. Ryan
Chief Executive Officer
50
THE DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(US DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARE AMOUNTS; US GAAP)
Year Ended
REVENUES
COST OF REVENUES
GROSS MARGIN
EXPENSES
Sales and marketing
Research and development
General and administrative
Other charges (Note 19)
Amortization of intangible assets
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
INTEREST EXPENSE
INVESTMENT INCOME
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (Note 17)
Current
Deferred
NET INCOME
EARNINGS PER SHARE (Note 15)
Basic
Diluted
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING (thousands)
Basic
Diluted
January 31,
January 31,
January 31,
2017
2016
2015
203,779
184,993
170,860
56,051
53,859
54,879
147,728
131,134
115,981
24,943
35,556
23,077
3,455
30,001
22,424
31,293
21,607
1,491
26,222
117,032
103,037
30,696
28,097
(611)
1,415
(522)
195
20,404
28,077
20,333
2,876
21,715
93,405
22,576
(1,088)
333
31,500
27,770
21,821
4,022
3,640
7,662
1,443
5,765
7,208
2,784
3,978
6,762
23,838
20,562
15,059
0.31
0.31
0.27
0.27
0.21
0.21
75,800
76,515
75,595
76,409
70,559
71,584
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
51
THE DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(US DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS; US GAAP)
Comprehensive income (loss)
Net Income
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax
(recovery) of ($143) for the year ended January 31, 2017 (January 31, 2016
– recovery of ($797); January 31, 2015 – expense of $445)
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of income tax expense of
$11 for the year ended January 31, 2017 (January 31, 2016 - nil; January
31, 2015 - nil)
Gain on marketable securities reclassified into net income
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
2017
2016
23,838
20,562
15,059
2,084
(9,640)
(24,123)
977
(28)
(960)
2,101
-
(9,668)
(24,123)
25,939
10,894
(9,064)
-
-
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
52
THE DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(US DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS; US GAAP)
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
2017
2016
Common shares
Balance, beginning of year
Shares issued:
Stock options and share units exercised
Issuance of common shares, net of issuance costs (Note 14)
Acquisitions (Note 3)
Balance, end of year
Additional paid-in capital
Balance, beginning of year
Stock-based compensation expense (Note 16)
Stock options and share units exercised
Settlement of stock options (Note 16)
Stock option income tax benefits
Balance, end of year
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, beginning of year
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes
Balance, end of year
Accumulated deficit
Balance, beginning of year
Net income
Balance, end of year
252,471
247,839
97,779
771
-
-
4,632
-
-
253,242
252,471
2,626
142,052
5,382
247,839
446,747
2,022
(205)
-
33
450,623
1,577
(68)
(7,000)
1,615
451,394
1,543
(1,670)
(733)
89
448,597
446,747
450,623
(34,880)
2,101
(25,212)
(9,668)
(1,089)
(24,123)
(32,779)
(34,880)
(25,212)
(262,303)
23,838
(282,865)
20,562
(297,924)
15,059
(238,465)
(262,303)
(282,865)
Total Shareholders’ Equity
430,595
402,035
390,385
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
53
THE DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(US DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS; US GAAP)
Year Ended
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation
Amortization of intangible assets
Stock-based compensation expense (Note 16)
Other non-cash operating activities
Deferred tax expense
Deferred tax charge
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
Trade
Other
Prepaid expenses and other
Inventory
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Income taxes payable
Deferred revenue
Cash provided by operating activities
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of marketable securities
Sale of marketable securities
Additions to property and equipment
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired and bank indebtedness
assumed (Note 3)
Cash used in investing activities
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from borrowing on the credit facility
Credit facility repayments
Payment of debt issuance costs
Issuance of common shares for cash, net of issuance costs
Settlement of stock options (Note 16)
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash
Increase (decrease) in cash
Cash, beginning of year
Cash, end of year
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for interest
Cash paid during the year for income taxes
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2017
2016
2015
23,838
20,562
15,059
3,628
30,001
2,022
(1,028)
3,640
358
2,727
(212)
(64)
2
(317)
3,674
1,431
2,883
72,583
3,377
26,222
1,577
(392)
5,765
22
764
203
(86)
314
3,295
21,715
1,543
-
3,978
-
3,999
4,869
141
859
(412)
(3,121)
25
(1,690)
(2,008)
54,243
(294)
(73)
(2,492)
49,478
(241)
6,140
(4,667)
-
-
-
(4,914)
(4,309)
(2,679)
(71,348)
(120,853)
(82,152)
(70,363)
(129,829)
(84,831)
10,801
(10,200)
(957)
145
-
(211)
(1,087)
-
-
-
20,000
(63,305)
(386)
158
140,724
(2,590)
(2,432)
(2,822)
(405)
96,628
(5,927)
55,348
62,705
922
(80,840)
37,213
118,053
38,135
37,213
118,053
64
3,861
31
3,533
692
2,983
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
54
THE DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(TABULAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS OF US DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS OR AS OTHERWISE INDICATED;
US GAAP)
Note 1 - Description of the Business
The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (“Descartes,” “Company,” “our” or “we”) is a global provider of global
logistics technology solutions that help our customers make and receive shipments and manage related
resources. Our network-based solutions, which primarily consist of services and software, connect people
to their trading partners and enable business document exchange (bookings, bills of lading, status
messages); regulatory compliance and customs filing; route and resource planning, execution and
monitoring; access and leverage global trade and restricted party data; inventory and asset visibility; rate
and transportation management; and warehouse operations. Our pricing model provides our customers
with flexibility in purchasing our solutions either on a subscription, transactional or a perpetual license
basis. Our primary focus is on serving transportation providers (air, ocean and truck modes), logistics
service providers (including third-party logistics providers, freight forwarders and customs brokers) and
distribution-intensive companies where delivery is either a key or a defining part of their own product or
service offering, or where there is an opportunity to reduce costs and improve service levels by optimizing
the use of their assets.
Note 2 –Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in United States (“US”) dollars and are
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the US (“GAAP”) and the rules
and regulations of the Canadian Securities Administrators and US Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) for the preparation of consolidated financial statements.
Our fiscal year commences on February 1st of each year and ends on January 31st of the following year.
Our fiscal year, which ends on January 31, 2017, is referred to as the “current fiscal year”, “fiscal 2017”,
“2017” or using similar words. Our previous fiscal year, which ended on January 31, 2016, is referred to
as the “previous fiscal year”, “fiscal 2016”, “2016” or using similar words. Other fiscal years are referenced
by the applicable year during which the fiscal year ends. For example, “2018” refers to the annual period
ending January 31, 2018 and the “fourth quarter of 2018” refers to the quarter ending January 31, 2018.
We have reclassified certain immaterial items in the consolidated financial statements to conform to the
current presentation.
Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Descartes and our wholly-owned
subsidiaries. We do not have any variable interests in variable interest entities. All intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated during consolidation.
Foreign currency translation
The US dollar is the presentation currency of the Company. Assets and liabilities of our subsidiaries are
translated into US dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses
are translated into US dollars using daily exchange rates. Translation adjustments resulting from this
process are accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of shareholders’
equity. On substantial liquidation of a foreign operation, the component of other accumulated
comprehensive income relating to that particular foreign operation is recognized in the consolidated
statements of operations.
The functional currency of each of our entities is the local currency in which they operate. Transactions
incurred in currencies other than the local currency of an entity are converted to the local currency at the
transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are re-measured into
55
the local currency at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. All foreign currency re-
measurement gains and losses are included in net income. For the year ended January 31, 2017, foreign
currency re-measurement loss of $0.1 million was included in net income (January 31, 2016 – loss of $0.2
million; January 31, 2015 – gain of $1.4 million).
Use of estimates
Preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts that are reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying note disclosures. Although these estimates and assumptions are based on management’s
best knowledge of current events, actual results may be different from the estimates. These estimates,
judgments and assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable at that time, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources.
Estimates and assumptions are used when accounting for items such as allocations of the purchase price
and the fair value of net assets acquired in business combination transactions, useful lives of intangible
assets and property and equipment, allowance for doubtful accounts, collectability of other receivables,
provisions for excess or obsolete inventory, restructuring accruals, revenue related estimates including
vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of selling price and best estimate of selling price (“BESP”),
fair value of stock-based compensation, assumptions embodied in the valuation of assets for impairment
assessment, valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets, realization of investment tax credits,
uncertain tax positions and recognition of contingencies.
Cash
Cash included highly liquid short-term deposits with original maturities of three months or less.
Financial instruments
Fair value of financial instruments
In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) Topic 320 "Investments - Debt and Equity Securities" (Topic 320) related to accounting for certain
investments in equity securities, and based on our intentions regarding these instruments, we classify our
marketable securities as available for sale and account for these investments at fair value.
The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash, accounts receivable (net), accounts payable, accrued
liabilities and income taxes payable approximate their fair value due to their short maturities.
Derivative instruments
We use derivative instruments to manage equity risk relating to our share-based compensation. We account
for these instruments in accordance with ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (Topic 815), which
requires that every derivative instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability
measured at its fair value as of the reporting date. We do not designate our derivative instruments as hedges
and as such the changes in our derivative financial instruments' fair values are recognized in earnings. The
fair value of equity contract derivatives is determined utilizing a valuation model based on the quoted market
value of our common shares at the balance sheet date.
Foreign exchange risk
We are exposed to foreign exchange risk because the Company transacts business in currencies other than
the US dollar. Accordingly, our results are affected, and may be affected in the future, by exchange rate
fluctuations of the US dollar relative to the Canadian dollar, euro and various other foreign currencies.
Interest rate risk
We are exposed to interest rate fluctuations to the extent that we borrow on our credit facility, which
depending on the type of advance under the available facilities, interest will be charged based on either i)
56
Canada or US prime rate; or ii) Banker’s Acceptance (BA); or iii) LIBOR. As of January 31, 2017, all amounts
previously borrowed under the credit facility have been repaid and no amounts remain owing.
We are also exposed to reductions in interest rates, which could adversely impact expected returns from our
investment of corporate funds in interest bearing bank accounts.
Credit risk
We are exposed to credit risk through our invested cash and accounts receivable. We hold our cash with
reputable financial institutions. The lack of concentration of accounts receivable from a single customer and
the dispersion of customers among industries and geographical locations mitigate our credit risk.
We do not use any type of speculative financial instruments, including but not limited to foreign exchange
contracts, futures, swaps and option agreements, to manage our foreign exchange or interest rate risks. In
addition, we do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.
Equity risk
We are exposed to equity risk through certain share-based compensation expenses that are fair valued at
the balance sheet date. The Company enters into equity derivative contracts including floating-rate equity
forwards to partially offset the potential fluctuations of certain future share-based compensation expenses.
The Company does not hold derivatives for speculative purposes.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of
customers to make their required payments. Specifically, we consider the age of the receivables,
customers’ payment history, historical write-offs, the creditworthiness of the customer, and current
economic trends among other factors. Accounts receivable are written off, and the associated allowance
is eliminated, if it is determined that the specific balance is no longer collectible. The allowance is
maintained for 100% of all accounts deemed to be uncollectible and, for those receivables not specifically
identified as uncollectible, an allowance is maintained for a specific percentage of those receivables based
upon the aging of accounts, our historical collection experience and current economic expectations. To
date, the actual losses have been within our expectations. No single customer accounted for more than
10% of the accounts receivable balance as of January 31, 2017 and 2016.
Inventory
Finished goods inventories are stated at the lower of cost and market. The cost of finished goods is
determined on the basis of average cost of units.
The valuation of inventory, including the determination of obsolete or excess inventory, requires
management to estimate the future demand for our products within specified time horizons. We perform
an assessment of inventory which includes a review of, among other factors, demand requirements,
product life cycle and development plans, product pricing and quality issues. If the demand for our
products indicates we are no longer able to sell inventories above cost or at all, we write down inventory
to market or excess inventory is written off.
Impairment of long-lived assets
We test long-lived assets or asset groups, such as property and equipment and finite life intangible assets,
for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate that there may be impairment.
Circumstances which could trigger a review include, but are not limited to: significant adverse changes in
the business climate or legal factors; current period cash flow or operating losses combined with a history
of losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset or asset group; and a
current expectation that the asset or asset group will more likely than not be sold or disposed of before
the end of its estimated useful life. An impairment loss is recognized when the estimate of undiscounted
future cash flows generated by such asset or asset group is less than the carrying amount. Measurement
of the impairment loss is based on the present value of the expected future cash flows. No impairment of
57
long-lived assets has been identified or recorded in our consolidated statements of operations for any of
the fiscal years presented.
Goodwill and intangible assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in a business combination over the fair value of net
tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill is not subject to amortization.
We test for impairment of goodwill at least annually on October 31st of each year and at any other time if
any event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce our fair value below our
reporting unit’s carrying amount. Our operations are analyzed by management and our chief operating
decision makers as being part of a single industry segment providing logistics technology solutions.
Accordingly, our goodwill impairment assessment is based on the allocation of goodwill to a single
reporting unit. We completed the qualitative assessment during our third quarter of 2017 and concluded
that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the goodwill was greater than the carrying value. As
a result, no impairment of goodwill was recorded in fiscal 2017 (no impairments were recorded for fiscal
2016 or fiscal 2015).
We perform further quarterly analysis of whether any event has occurred that would more likely than not
reduce our fair value below our reporting unit’s carrying amount and, if so, we perform a goodwill
impairment test between the annual date. Any impairment adjustment is recognized as an expense in the
period that the adjustment is identified.
Intangible assets related to our acquisitions are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date.
Intangible assets include customer agreements and relationships, non-compete covenants, existing
technologies and trade names. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated
useful lives. We write down intangible asset or asset groups with a finite life to fair value when the related
undiscounted cash flows are not expected to allow for recovery of the carrying value. Fair value of
intangible asset or asset groups is determined by discounting the expected related future cash flows.
Amortization of our intangible assets is generally recorded at the following rates:
Customer agreements and relationships
Existing technologies
Trade names
Non-compete covenants
Straight-line over three to twenty years
Straight-line over two to twelve years
Straight-line over one to fifteen years
Straight-line over two to twelve years
Property and equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation of our property and equipment is generally
recorded at the following rates:
Computer equipment and software 30% declining balance
20% declining balance
Furniture and fixtures
Straight-line over lesser of useful life or term of lease
Leasehold improvements
Fully depreciated property and equipment are removed from the balance sheet when they are no longer
in use.
Revenue recognition
We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue realized or
realizable and earned when there exists persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product has been
delivered or the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and
collectability is reasonably assured. All revenue is recognized net of any related sales taxes. In addition to
this general policy, the specific revenue recognition policies for each major category of revenue are
included below.
58
Services Revenues - Services revenues are principally comprised of the following: (i) ongoing transactional
fees for use of our services and products by our customers, which are recognized as the transactions
occur; (ii) professional services revenues from consulting, implementation and training services related to
our services and products, which are recognized as the services are performed; (iii) maintenance,
subscription and other related revenues, including revenues associated with maintenance and support of
our services and products, which are recognized ratably over the subscription period; and (iv) hardware
revenues, which are recognized when hardware is shipped.
License Revenues - License revenues are derived from perpetual licenses granted to our customers to use
our software products.
We enter into arrangements from time to time that may consist of multiple deliverables which may include
any combination of services and software licenses. Our typical multiple-element arrangements involve: (i)
software with maintenance support services, (ii) professional services and (iii) hardware with services. For
any arrangements involving multiple deliverables
involving non-software elements (hardware,
professional services, subscription, etc.) the consideration from the arrangement is allocated to each
respective element based on its relative selling price, using VSOE of selling price. In instances when we
are unable to establish the selling price using VSOE, we attempt to establish selling price of each element
based on acceptable third party evidence of selling price (“TPE”); however we are generally unable to
reliably determine the selling price of similar competitor products or services on a stand-alone basis. In
these instances, we use our BESP in our allocation of the arrangement consideration. The objective of
BESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the product or service was sold on a
stand-alone basis. We determine BESP for each specific element in a multiple element arrangement
considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, market conditions, competitive landscape,
internal costs, gross margin objectives and pricing practices.
For arrangements involving multiple deliverables of software with maintenance support services, the
revenue is recognized based ASC Subtopic 985-605 “Software: Revenue Recognition”. If we are unable
to determine VSOE of fair value for all of the deliverables of the arrangement, but are able to obtain VSOE
of fair value for all the undelivered elements, revenue is allocated using the residual method. Under the
residual method, the amount of revenue allocated to the delivered elements equals the total arrangement
consideration less the aggregate fair value of any undelivered elements. If VSOE of fair value of any
undelivered software items does not exist, revenue from the entire arrangement is initially deferred and
recognized at the earlier of: (i) delivery of those elements for which VSOE of fair value did not exist; or
(ii) when VSOE of fair value can be established.
Research and development costs
To date, we have not capitalized any costs related to research and development of our computer software
products. Costs incurred between the dates that the product is considered to be technologically feasible
and is considered to be ready for general release to customers have historically been expensed as they
have not been significant.
Stock-based compensation plans
Stock Options
We maintain stock option plans for non-employee directors, officers, employees and other service
providers. Options to purchase our common shares are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair
market value of our common shares as of the date of grant. This fair market value is determined using
the closing price of our common shares on the TSX on the day immediately preceding the date of the
grant.
Employee stock options generally vest over a five-year period starting from the grant date and expire
seven years from the grant date. Non-employee directors’ and officers’ stock options generally have
quarterly vesting over a three- to five-year period. We issue new shares from treasury upon the exercise
of a stock option.
59
The fair value of employee stock option grants that are ultimately expected to vest are amortized to
expense in our consolidated statement of operations based on the straight-line attribution method. The
fair value of stock option grants is calculated using the Black-Scholes Merton option-pricing model.
Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of our common stock and other factors. The risk-free
interest rates are based on Government of Canada average bond yields for a period consistent with the
expected life of the option in effect at the time of the grant. The expected option life is based on the
historical life of our granted options and other factors.
Performance & Restricted Share Units
We maintain a performance and restricted share unit plan pursuant to which certain of our officers are
eligible to receive grants of performance share units (“PSUs”) and restricted share units (“RSUs”).
PSUs vest at the end of a three-year performance period. The ultimate number of PSUs that vest is based
on the total shareholder return (“TSR”) of our Company relative to the TSR of companies comprising a
peer index group. TSR is calculated based on the weighted-average closing price of shares for the five
trading days preceding the beginning and end of the performance period. The fair value of PSUs is
expensed to stock-based compensation expense over the vesting period. PSUs expire ten years from the
grant date. New shares are issued from treasury upon the redemption of a PSU.
PSUs are measured at fair value estimated using a Monte Carlo Simulation approach. Expected volatility
is based on historical volatility of our common stock and other factors. The risk-free interest rates are
based on the Government of Canada average bond yields for a period consistent with the expected life of
the PSUs at the time of the grant. The expected PSU life is based on the historical life of our stock options
and other factors.
RSUs vest annually over a three-year period starting from the grant date and expire ten years from the
grant date. We issue new shares from treasury upon the redemption of an RSU.
RSUs are measured at fair value based on the closing price of our common shares for the day preceding
the date of the grant and will be expensed to stock-based compensation expense over the vesting period.
Deferred Share Unit Plan
Our board of directors adopted a deferred share unit plan effective as of June 28, 2004, pursuant to which
non-employee directors are eligible to receive grants of deferred share units (“DSUs”), each of which has
an initial value equal to the weighted-average closing price of our common shares for the five trading days
preceding the grant date. The plan allows each director to choose to receive, in the form of DSUs, all,
none or a percentage of the eligible director’s fees which would otherwise be payable in cash. If a director
has invested less than the minimum amount of equity in Descartes, as prescribed from time to time by
the board of directors, then the director must take at least 50% of the base annual fee for serving as a
director in the form of DSUs. Each DSU fully vests upon award but is distributed only when the director
ceases to be a member of the board of directors. Vested units are settled in cash based on our common
share price when conversion takes place. Fair value of the liability is based on the closing price of our
common shares at the balance sheet date.
Cash-Settled Restricted Share Unit Plan
Our board of directors adopted a cash-settled restricted share unit plan effective as of May 23, 2007,
pursuant to which certain of our employees and non-employee directors are eligible to receive grants of
cash-settled restricted share units (“CRSUs”), each of which has an initial value equal to the weighted-
average closing price of our common shares for the five trading days preceding the date of the grant. The
CRSUs generally vest based on continued employment and have annual vesting over three- to five-year
periods. Vested units are settled in cash based on our common share price when conversion takes place,
which is within 30 days following a vesting date and in any event prior to December 31st of the calendar
year in which a vesting date occurs. Fair value of the liability is based on the closing price of our common
shares at the balance sheet date.
60
Business combinations
We apply the provisions of ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (Topic 805), in the accounting for our
acquisitions. It requires us to recognize separately from goodwill, the assets acquired and the liabilities
assumed at their acquisition date fair values. Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess
of consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition date fair values of the assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired
and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date as well as contingent consideration, where applicable, our
estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period,
which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement
period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first,
any subsequent adjustments would be recorded to our consolidated statement of operations.
Costs to exit or restructure certain activities of an acquired company or our internal operations are
accounted for as termination and exit costs pursuant to ASC Topic 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations”
(Topic 420) and are accounted for separately from the business combination.
For a given acquisition, we generally identify certain pre-acquisition contingencies as of the acquisition
date and may extend our review and evaluation of these pre-acquisition contingencies throughout the
measurement period in order to obtain sufficient information to assess whether we include these
contingencies as a part of the purchase price allocation and, if so, to determine the estimated amounts.
If we determine that a pre-acquisition contingency (non-income tax related) is probable in nature and
estimable as of the acquisition date, we record our best estimate for such a contingency as a part of the
preliminary purchase price allocation. We often continue to gather information and evaluate our pre-
acquisition contingencies throughout the measurement period and if we make changes to the amounts
recorded or if we identify additional pre-acquisition contingencies during the measurement period, such
amounts will be included in the purchase price allocation during the measurement period and,
subsequently, in our results of operations.
Uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances assumed in connection with a business
combination are initially estimated as of the acquisition date. We review these items during the
measurement period as we continue to actively seek and collect information relating to facts and
circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. Changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax related
valuation allowances made subsequent to the measurement period, or if they relate to facts and
circumstances that did not exist at the acquisition date, are recorded in our provision for income taxes in
our consolidated statement of operations.
Income taxes
We use the liability method of income tax allocation to account for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities arise from temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported
amounts in the consolidated financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future
years. These temporary differences are measured using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance is
recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the extent that we consider it is more likely than not that a
deferred tax asset will not be realized. In determining the valuation allowance, we consider factors such
as the reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected taxable income, our history of losses for tax
purposes, and the character of income tax assets and tax planning strategies. A change to these factors
could impact the estimated valuation allowance and income tax expense.
We evaluate our uncertain tax positions by using a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring
uncertain tax positions and provisions for income taxes. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for
recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, based
solely on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related
appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the appropriate amount of the benefit
to recognize. The amount of benefit to recognize is measured as the maximum amount which is more
likely than not to be realized. The tax position is derecognized when it is no longer more likely than not
61
that the position will be sustained on audit. We continually assess the likelihood and amount of potential
adjustments and adjust the income tax provisions, income taxes payable and deferred income taxes in
the period in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net
income by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and all additional
common shares that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive common shares had been issued
during the period. The treasury stock method is used to compute the dilutive effect of stock-based
compensation.
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest
(Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03
simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs. ASU 2015-03 is effective for annual periods, and interim
periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, which was our fiscal year
beginning February 1, 2016. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-05, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other
– Internal Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing
Arrangement” (“ASU 2015-05”). ASU 2015-05 provides guidance about whether a cloud computing
arrangement includes a software license. ASU 2015-05 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods
within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, which was our fiscal year beginning
February 1, 2016. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The adoption of
this standard did not have a material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial
Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 2015-40)” (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 requires an entity’s
management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements
are issued. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual
periods and interim periods thereafter, which is our fiscal year ended January 31, 2017. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company adopted this guidance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The adoption of this
amendment did not have a material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with
Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). This update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic
605, "Revenue Recognition" and nearly all other existing revenue recognition guidance under US GAAP.
The core principal of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are
transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for
those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-14 which
defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for one year. ASU 2014-09 is now effective for annual periods,
and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which will be our
fiscal year beginning February 1, 2018. Early adoption as of the original effective date of ASU 2014-09 is
permitted. When applying ASU 2014-09 we can either apply the amendments: (i) retrospectively to each
prior reporting period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients as defined within ASU
2014-09 or (ii) retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at
the date of initial application and providing certain additional disclosures as defined within ASU 2014-09.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)”
(“ASU 2016-08”). ASU 2016-08 amends the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to clarify the implementation
guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards
62
Update 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance
Obligations and Licensing” (“ASU 2016-10”). ASU 2016-10 amends the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to clarify
the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and licensing. In May 2016, the FASB
issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606):
Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU 2016-12”). ASU 2016-12 amends the
guidance in ASU 2014-09 to clarify the implementation guidance on collectibility, presentation of sales
taxes, noncash consideration, completed contracts and contract modifications. In December 2016, the
FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic
606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2016-20”). ASU 2016-20 affects narrow aspects of
the guidance issued in 2014-09. We continue to review our existing policies, differences between existing
policies and the new standard, ensuring our data collection is appropriate and communicating the
upcoming changes with various stakeholders. As a result, we are continuing to assess the impact that the
above-mentioned ASUs will have on our results of operations, financial position and disclosures. Although
it is expected to have an impact on our revenue recognition policies and disclosures, we have not yet
selected a transition method nor have we determined when we will adopt the standard and the effect of
the standard on our ongoing financial reporting.
In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying
the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 provides guidance to more clearly
articulate the requirements for the measurement and disclosure of inventory. ASU 2015-11 is effective for
annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016,
which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2017. The Company will adopt this guidance in the first
quarter of fiscal 2018. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our
results of operations or disclosures.
In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, “Financial Instruments—Overall
(Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-
01”). ASU 2016-01 supersedes the guidance to classify equity securities with readily determinable fair
values into different categories reducing the number of items that are recognized in other comprehensive
income as well as simplifying the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily
determinable fair values. ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those
annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1,
2018. The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The adoption of this
amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU
2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 supersedes the lease guidance in ASC Topic 840, “Leases” and requires the
recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases.
ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning
after December 15, 2018, which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2019. The Company will
adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. The adoption of this standard is expected to increase
assets and liabilities, as we will be required to record a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease
liability in our consolidated financial statements, as well as a decrease to operating costs, an increase to
finance costs (due to accretion of the lease liability) and an increase to depreciation and amortization (due
to amortization of the right-of-use asset).
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock
Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-
09”). ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting and presentation of share-based compensation. ASU 2016-
09 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after
December 15, 2016, which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted.
The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The adoption of this amendment
is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit
Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-
63
13 requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held. ASU 2016-
13 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after
December 15, 2019, which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted.
The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2021 and is currently evaluating the
impact that the adoption will have on its results of operations, financial position and disclosures.
In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic
230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 clarifies
the presentation and classification in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual
periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which will
be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this
guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a
material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740):
Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory” (“ASU 2016-16”). ASU 2016-16 requires the
recognition of the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory
when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those
annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1,
2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019.
The adoption of this standard will result in the write-off of the balance of unamortized deferred tax charges
and the recognition of previously unrecognized deferred tax assets in certain jurisdictions.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic
805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a
business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of
assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual
periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which will be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2018.
Early adoption is not permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019.
The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or
disclosures.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and
Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04
simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual
periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2019, which will
be our fiscal year beginning February 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this
guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2021. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a
material impact on our results of operations or disclosures.
Note 3 – Acquisitions
On December 23, 2016, we acquired The Datamyne Inc. (“Datamyne”), a provider of cloud-based trade
data content solutions for customers to analyze import and export trade activity. Datamyne, primarily
operating in the U.S. and South America, collects, cleanses and commercializes logistics trade data from
over 50 nations across five continents, including key markets in North America, Latin America, Asia, Africa,
and the European Union. Subscribers use Datamyne’s web‐based solutions and business intelligence tools
to augment, speed up and simplify trade data research, and to shape global marketing, prospecting, and
sourcing strategies. The total purchase price for the acquisition was $52.5 million, net of cash acquired,
which was funded with cash on hand. The gross contractual amount of trade receivables acquired was
$1.5 million with a fair value of $1.4 million at the date of acquisition. Our acquisition date estimate of
contractual cash flows not expected to be collected was $0.1 million. The completion of the initial purchase
price allocation is pending the finalization of the fair value for certain taxation-related balances, accrued
liability balances, deferred revenue, as well as potential unrecorded liabilities. We expect to finalize the
purchase price allocation on or before December 23, 2017.
64
On November 11, 2016, we acquired 4Solutions Information Technology Pty Ltd. (“4Solutions”), an
Australia-based provider of cloud-based business-to-business supply chain integration solutions.
4Solutions operates the Health Supply Network, an electronic document exchange network for the
healthcare community, which allows large multi-national, local pharmaceutical manufacturers and
wholesalers connect and collaborate to automate a wide array of supply chain processes. The total
purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $2.5 million, net of cash acquired, which was funded
with cash on hand. The gross contractual amount of trade receivables acquired was $0.2 million with a
fair value of $0.2 million at the date of acquisition. Our acquisition date estimate of contractual cash flows
not expected to be collected was nil. The completion of the initial purchase price allocation is pending the
finalization of the fair value for certain taxation-related balances, accrued liability balances, as well as
potential unrecorded liabilities. We expect to finalize the purchase price allocation on or before November
11, 2017.
On October 12, 2016, we acquired Appterra LLC (“Appterra”), a US-based provider of cloud-based
business-to-business supply chain integration solutions. Appterra’s solutions help its customers connect
electronically, automate supply chain processes, and enhance collaboration and visibility among global
trading partners. The total purchase price for the acquisition was $5.7 million, net of cash acquired, which
was funded with cash on hand. Additional contingent consideration of up to $1.6 million in cash is payable
if certain revenue performance targets are met by Appterra in the two years following the acquisition. The
fair value of the contingent consideration was valued at $0.7 million at the acquisition date. The gross
contractual amount of trade receivables acquired was $0.1 million with a fair value of $0.1 million at the
date of acquisition. Our acquisition date estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected
was nil. The completion of the initial purchase price allocation is pending the finalization of the fair value
for certain taxation-related balances, accrued liability balances, as well as potential unrecorded liabilities.
We expect to finalize the purchase price allocation on or before October 12, 2017.
On April 29, 2016, we acquired pixi* Software GmbH (“Pixi”), a Germany-based provider of technology
solutions for e-commerce order fulfilment and warehouse management. Pixi’s solutions help its customers
automate e-commerce processes originating from online orders, and Pixi is currently integrated with
hundreds of e-commerce sites in Europe. The total purchase price for the acquisition was approximately
$10.6 million, net of cash acquired, which was funded by drawing on our credit facility. The draw on the
credit facility has subsequently been repaid. The gross contractual amount of trade receivables acquired
was $0.6 million with a fair value of $0.4 million at the date of acquisition. Our acquisition date estimate
of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected was $0.2 million. The completion of the initial
purchase price allocation is pending the finalization of the fair value for certain taxation-related balances,
accrued liability balances, as well as potential unrecorded liabilities. We expect to finalize the purchase
price allocation on or before April 29, 2017.
For the businesses acquired during 2017, we incurred acquisition-related costs of $1.0 million. The
acquisition-related costs were primarily for advisory services and are included in other charges in our
consolidated statements of operations. During 2017, we have recognized aggregate revenues of $8.6
million and an aggregate net loss of $0.4 million, respectively, from Pixi, Appterra, 4Solutions and
Datamyne since the dates of acquisition in our consolidated statements of operations.
65
The preliminary purchase price allocations for businesses acquired during 2017, which have not been
finalized, are as follows:
Purchase price consideration:
Cash, less cash acquired
related to Pixi ($688),
Appterra ($66), 4Solutions
($281) and Datamyne ($2,637)
Contingent consideration
Net working capital
adjustments (receivable)
Allocated to:
Current assets, excluding cash
acquired
Property and equipment
Deferred income tax asset
Current liabilities
Deferred revenue
Deferred income tax liability
Income tax liability
Net tangible liabilities assumed
Finite life intangible assets
acquired:
Customer agreements and
relationships
Existing technology
Trade names
Non-compete covenants
Goodwill
Pixi
Appterra
4Solutions
Datamyne
Total
10,648
5,703
2,456
52,541
71,348
-
700
-
-
700
(26)
10,622
(155)
6,248
4
2,460
(368)
52,173
(545)
71,503
500
424
257
1,843
3,024
46
-
(523)
(78)
(1,870)
-
(1,925)
21
18
(398)
(633)
-
-
(568)
33
-
(182)
(164)
(443)
-
(499)
87
3,281
(1,671)
(2,813)
(10,955)
(694)
(10,922)
187
3,299
(2,774)
(3,688)
(13,268)
(694)
(13,914)
1,375
1,840
910
13,300
17,425
4,467
-
-
6,705
10,622
1,160
-
50
3,766
6,248
607
91
-
1,351
2,460
12,500
1,790
390
35,115
52,173
18,734
1,881
440
46,937
71,503
The above transactions were accounted for using the acquisition method in accordance with ASC Topic
805, “Business Combinations”. The purchase price allocation in the table above represents our estimates
of the allocations of the purchase price and the fair value of net assets acquired. The preliminary purchase
price allocation may differ from the final purchase price allocation, and these differences may be material.
Revisions to the allocations will occur as additional information about the fair value of assets and liabilities
becomes available. The final purchase price allocation will be completed within one year from the
acquisition dates.
No in-process research and development was acquired in these transactions.
The acquired intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows:
Customer agreements and relationships
Existing technology
Trade names
Non-compete covenants
Pixi
9 years
5 years
N/A
N/A
Appterra
11 years
5 years
N/A
5 years
4Solutions
8 years
2 years
5 years
N/A
Datamyne
9 years
6 years
9 years
5 years
66
The goodwill on the Pixi, Appterra, 4Solutions and Datamyne acquisitions arose as a result of the combined
strategic value to our growth plan. The goodwill arising from the Pixi, 4Solutions and Datamyne
acquisitions are not deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill arising from the Appterra acquisition is
deductible for tax purposes.
On November 25, 2015, we acquired Oz Development Inc. (“Oz”), a US-based provider of application
integration solutions that help small-to-medium sized businesses (“SMBs”) automate a number of logistics
and supply chain processes. The solutions help a growing SMB community connect to, and integrate with,
leading SMB ERP, CRM and e-commerce platforms. The total purchase price for the acquisition was $29.5
million, net of cash acquired, which was funded with cash on hand. The gross contractual amount of trade
receivables acquired was $0.3 million with a fair value of $0.3 million at the date of acquisition. Our
acquisition date estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected was nil.
On July 22, 2015, we acquired all outstanding shares of privately-held BearWare Inc. (“BearWare”), a US-
based provider of mobile solutions designed to improve collaboration between retailers and their logistics
service providers. BearWare's system leverages mobile technologies to scan cartons at each point from
the distribution centers through to the store front, helping retailers and their logistics service providers
collaborate on store shipments. The total purchase price for the acquisition was $11.2 million, net of cash
acquired, which was funded with cash on hand. The gross contractual amount of trade receivables acquired
was $0.8 million with a fair value of $0.7 million at the date of acquisition. Our acquisition date estimate
of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected was $0.1 million.
On July 20, 2015, we acquired all outstanding shares of privately-held MK Data Services LLC (“MK Data”),
a US-based provider of denied party screening trade data and solutions. MK Data's technology screens
shipments against a comprehensive, frequently updated, international database of restricted parties
helping businesses comply with denied party screening requirements. The total purchase price for the
acquisition was $80.2 million, net of cash acquired, which was funded with cash on hand. The acquisition
included an employee retention agreement to provide up to $3.1 million in retention bonuses to employees
conditional on future services rendered over a specified time period. These amounts are being expensed
over the service periods. The gross contractual amount of trade receivables acquired was $1.3 million with
a fair value of $1.2 million at the date of acquisition. Our acquisition date estimate of contractual cash
flows not expected to be collected was $0.1 million.
For businesses acquired during 2016, we incurred acquisition-related costs of $1.2 million, primarily for
advisory services and retention bonuses. These costs are included in other charges in our consolidated
statements of operations.
67
The final purchase price allocations for businesses we acquired during 2016 are as follows:
Purchase price consideration:
Cash, net of cash acquired related to MK
Data ($345), BearWare ($243) and Oz
($870)
Net working capital adjustments
(receivable)
Allocated to:
Current assets, excluding cash acquired
Property and equipment
Current liabilities
Deferred revenue
Net tangible assets (liabilities) assumed
Finite life intangible assets acquired:
Customer agreements and relationships
Existing technology
Tradenames
Non-compete covenants
Goodwill
MK Data
BearWare
Oz
Total
80,151
11,243
29,459
120,853
(84)
80,067
(19)
11,224
(24)
29,435
(127)
120,726
2,083
-
(204)
(2,610)
(731)
7,500
22,000
190
-
51,108
80,067
759
-
(112)
(451)
196
2,600
3,400
70
-
4,958
11,224
466
29
(293)
(1,634)
(1,432)
5,400
7,500
90
240
17,637
29,435
3,308
29
(609)
(4,695)
(1,967)
15,500
32,900
350
240
73,703
120,726
No in-process research and development was acquired in these transactions.
The acquired intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows:
Customer agreements and relationships
Existing technology
Tradenames
Non-compete covenants
MK Data
13 years
7 years
5 years
N/A
BearWare
11 years
5 years
5 years
N/A
Oz
9 years
5 years
3 years
5 years
The goodwill on the MK Data, BearWare and Oz acquisitions arose as a result of the combined strategic
value to our growth plan. The goodwill arising from the MK Data, BearWare and Oz acquisitions is
deductible for tax purposes.
On December 5, 2014, we acquired all outstanding shares of privately-held Pentant Limited (“Pentant”),
a leading UK-based Community System Provider offering customs connectivity and import/export
inventory control solutions for ocean, truck and air cargo. Pentant provides its shipper and logistics
customers with a reliable and secure connection to both CHIEF (the central UK Revenue & Customs
system) and ICS (the European Union Import Control System) to streamline declaration, cargo security
and clearance processes. The total purchase price for the acquisition was $2.1 million, net of cash acquired,
which was funded with cash on hand. Additional contingent consideration of up to $0.4 million in cash may
have become payable had certain revenue performance targets been met by Pentant during 2016. The
fair value of the contingent consideration was valued at nil at the acquisition date and January 31, 2016.
The gross contractual amount of trade receivables acquired was $0.1 million with a fair value of $0.1
million at the date of acquisition.
On December 5, 2014, we acquired all outstanding shares of privately-held e-customs Inc. (“e-customs”),
68
a leading provider of electronic security and fiscal customs filing solutions in the UK. e-customs' cloud-
based solution, Webdecs, provides both shippers and logistics service providers with a wide range of
customs capabilities to cost effectively comply with UK fiscal filing and security filing requirements. The
total purchase price for the acquisition was $9.6 million, net of cash acquired, which was funded with cash
on hand. Additional contingent consideration of up to $1.2 million in cash may have become payable had
certain revenue performance targets been met by e-customs during 2016. The fair value of the contingent
consideration was valued at nil at the acquisition date and January 31, 2016. The gross contractual amount
of trade receivables acquired was $0.2 million with a fair value of $0.2 million at the date of acquisition.
On November 19, 2014, we acquired all outstanding shares of privately-held Airclic Inc. (“Airclic”), a
leading US-based provider of mobile solutions that help companies reduce the cost of delivering goods by
automating traditional paper-based processes. Airclic's cloud-based mobile solutions help streamline and
automate complex 'last mile' logistics processes. The total purchase price for the acquisition was $29.6
million, net of cash acquired, which was funded with cash on hand. The gross contractual amount of trade
receivables acquired was $4.5 million with a fair value of $4.5 million at the date of acquisition. Our
acquisition date estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected was nil. In the third quarter
of 2016, the preliminary purchase price allocation for Airclic was finalized resulting in a $0.8 million
increase to goodwill and income taxes payable.
On May 30, 2014 we acquired all outstanding membership interests of privately-held Customs Info, LLC
(“Customs Info”), a leading US-based provider of trade data content to power Global Trade Management
(GTM) systems and streamline global trade automation. The total purchase price for the acquisition was
$39.5 million, net of cash acquired, which was funded by $34.1 million in cash and approximately 0.4
million Descartes common shares valued at $5.4 million. As part of completing the acquisition $20.0 million
of the $39.5 million purchase price was funded by drawing on our revolving debt facility, which was
subsequently repaid. Additional contingent consideration of up to $3.9 million in cash may have become
payable had certain revenue performance targets been met by Customs Info during the calendar year
2014. The fair value of the contingent consideration was valued at nil at the acquisition date and the
performance targets were not met. The gross contractual amount of trade receivables acquired was $1.8
million with a fair value of $1.7 million at the date of acquisition. Our acquisition date estimate of
contractual cash flows not expected to be collected was $0.1 million.
On April 1, 2014, we acquired all outstanding shares of privately-held Computer Management USA, Inc.
and Computer Management NA, Inc. (collectively, “Computer Management”), a US-based provider of
security filing solutions and air cargo management solutions for airlines and their partners. The total
purchase price for the acquisition was $6.7 million, net of cash acquired, which was funded with cash on
hand. The gross contractual amount of trade receivables acquired was $0.2 million with a fair value of
$0.2 million at the date of acquisition. Our acquisition date estimate of contractual cash flows not expected
to be collected was nil.
For businesses acquired during 2015, we incurred acquisition-related costs of $1.5 million, primarily for
advisory services and retention bonuses. These costs are included in other charges in our consolidated
statements of operations.
69
The final purchase price allocations for businesses we acquired during 2015 are as follows:
Computer
Manage-
ment
Customs
Info
Airclic
customs Pentant
Total
e-
Purchase price consideration:
Cash, excluding cash acquired
related to Computer
Management ($112), Customs
Info (nil), Airclic ($117), e-
customs ($1,983) and Pentant
($21)
Common shares issued
Net working capital adjustments
(receivable) / payable
Allocated to:
Current assets, excluding cash
acquired
Property and equipment
Current liabilities
Deferred revenue
Deferred income tax liability
Debt
Net tangible assets (liabilities)
assumed
Finite life intangible assets
acquired:
Customer agreements and
relationships
Existing technology
Trade names
Non-compete covenants
Goodwill
6,689
-
34,121
5,382
29,597
-
9,611
-
2,134
-
82,152
5,382
3
6,692
(813)
38,690
(318)
29,279
(41)
9,570
(13)
2,121
(1,182)
86,352
211
65
(10)
(8)
-
-
258
1,754
-
(556)
(3,147)
-
(927)
(2,876)
4,990
440
(3,466)
(6,930)
-
-
(4,966)
1,190
7
(399)
(19)
(1,053)
-
(274)
142
-
(658)
(38)
(315)
-
(869)
8,287
512
(5,089)
(10,142)
(1,368)
(927)
(8,727)
3,256
1,840
-
-
1,338
6,692
8,650
5,708
682
391
26,135
38,690
7,802
13,786
-
177
12,480
29,279
2,318
2,807
-
138
4,581
9,570
1,336
595
-
-
1,059
2,121
23,362
24,736
682
706
45,593
86,352
No in-process research and development was acquired in these transactions.
The acquired intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows:
Computer
Management
Customs
Info
Airclic
e-customs
Pentant
Customer agreements
and relationships
Existing technology
Trade names
Non-compete covenants
9 years
6 years
N/A
N/A
9 years
3 years
15 years
12 years
9 years
8 years
N/A
12 years
10 years
6 years
N/A
12 years
9 years
6 years
N/A
N/A
70
The goodwill on the Pentant, e-customs, Airclic, Customs Info and Computer Management acquisitions
arose as a result of the combined strategic value to our growth plan. The goodwill arising from the Pentant
and e-customs acquisitions is not deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill arising from the Airclic,
Customs Info and Computer Management acquisitions is deductible for tax purposes
The financial information in the table below summarizes selected results of operations on a pro forma
basis as if we had acquired Datamyne, 4Solutions, Appterra, Pixi, Oz, BearWare, MK Data, Airclic and
Customs Info as of the beginning of each of the periods presented. The pro forma results of operations
for Pentant, e-customs, and Computer Management transactions have not been included in the table below
as they are not material to our consolidated financial statements.
This pro forma information is for information purposes only and does not purport to represent what our
results of operations for the periods presented would have been had the acquisitions of Datamyne,
4Solutions, Appterra, Pixi, Oz, BearWare, MK Data, Airclic and Customs Info occurred at the beginning of
the period indicated, or to project our results of operations for any future period.
Pro forma results of operations (unaudited)
Year Ended
Revenues
Net income
Earnings per share
Basic
Diluted
January 31,
2017
221,128
January 31, January 31,
2015
226,619
2016
219,029
23,604
21,132
12,980
0.31
0.31
0.28
0.28
0.18
0.18
Note 4 – Fair Value Measurements
ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (Topic 820) defines fair value as the price that
would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market
for that asset or liability. The fair value, in this context, should be calculated based on assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In
addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk, including our
own credit risk.
Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation
methodologies in measuring fair value into three levels:
• Level 1—inputs are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active
markets.
• Level 2—inputs are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted
prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation
techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
• Level 3—inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimates of
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are
therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted
cash flow models, and similar techniques.
During the period ended January 31, 2017, the Company sold its portfolio of marketable securities. The
Company did not hold any marketable securities as of January 31, 2017.
The following table shows the Company’s marketable securities investment portfolio measured at fair value
on a recurring basis as of January 31, 2016:
71
Level 1
Short-Term Marketable Securities
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses)
Estimated Fair
Value
-
(28)
4,639
Cost
4,667
The Company’s marketable securities have been classified and accounted for as available-for-sale.
Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and
reevaluates the designations at each balance sheet date. The Company classifies its marketable securities
as either short-term or long-term based on the nature of each security and its availability for use in current
operations. The Company’s marketable securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and
losses, net of taxes, reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. The
cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method.
The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash, accounts receivable (net), accounts payable, accrued
liabilities and income taxes payable approximate their fair value (a Level 2 measurement) due to their
short maturities.
The Company enters into equity derivative contracts including floating-rate equity forwards to partially
offset the potential fluctuations of certain future share-based compensation expenses. The Company does
not hold derivatives for speculative purposes. As at January 31, 2017, we had equity derivatives for
238,000 Descartes common shares with a weighted average price of $19.63. The following table shows
the Company’s derivative instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 31, 2017:
Derivative assets:
Equity contracts
Fair Value of
Derivatives
Designated as Hedge
Instruments
Fair Value of
Derivatives Not
Designated As Hedge
Instruments
Fair Value
-
497
497
The fair value of equity contract derivatives is determined utilizing a valuation model based on the quoted
market value of our common shares at the balance sheet date (Level 2 fair value inputs). The fair value
of equity contract derivatives is recorded as other current assets and gains and losses are recorded in
general and administrative expenses in the consolidated financial statements. For the years ended January
31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recognized a fair value gain in general and administrative expenses of $0.5
million, nil and nil, respectively.
Note 5 – Trade Receivables
Trade receivables
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
January 31, January 31,
2016
2017
26,495
(1,094)
25,401
27,080
(1,466)
25,614
Included in accounts receivable are unbilled receivables in the amount of $1.0 million as at January 31,
2017 ($1.0 million as at January 31, 2016). Bad debt expense was $0.6 million, $0.8 million and $0.4
million for the years ended January 31, 2017, January 31, 2016 and January 31, 2015, respectively.
72
Note 6 – Other Receivables
Net working capital adjustments receivable from acquisitions
Other receivables
January 31, January 31,
2016
2017
565
3,144
3,709
193
2,938
3,131
Other receivables include receivables related to sales and use taxes, income taxes and non-trade
receivables. At January 31, 2017, $0.6 million ($0.2 million as at January 31, 2016) of the net working
capital adjustments receivable from acquisitions is recoverable from amounts held in escrow related to
the respective acquisitions.
Note 7 – Inventory
At January 31, 2017 and January 31, 2016, inventory is entirely comprised of finished goods inventory.
Finished goods inventory consists of hardware and related parts for mobile asset units held for sale. For
the years ended January 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, a provision for excess or obsolete inventories has
been recorded in cost of revenues of nil, $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
Note 8 – Property and Equipment
Cost
Computer equipment and software
Furniture and fixtures
Leasehold improvements
Accumulated amortization
Computer equipment and software
Furniture and fixtures
Leasehold improvements
Net
January 31, January 31,
2016
2017
29,687
1,846
566
32,099
20,153
1,164
335
21,652
10,447
26,335
1,062
431
27,828
18,134
853
237
19,224
8,604
73
Note 9 - Intangible Assets
Cost
Customer agreements and relationships
Existing technology
Trade names
Non-compete covenants
Accumulated amortization
Customer agreements and relationships
Existing technology
Trade names
Non-compete covenants
Net
January 31,
2017
January 31,
2016
125,057
137,587
6,314
2,916
271,874
56,509
64,879
3,335
1,706
126,429
145,445
107,743
117,586
4,515
2,559
232,403
45,853
48,295
3,128
1,565
98,841
133,562
Intangible assets related to our acquisitions are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date. The
change in intangible assets during 2017 is primarily due to the acquisitions of Pixi, Appterra, 4Solutions
and Datamyne described in Note 3 to these consolidated financial statements. The balance of the change
in intangible assets is due to foreign currency translation and amortization.
Intangible assets with a finite life are amortized into income over their useful lives. Amortization expense
for existing intangible assets is expected to be $145.5 million over the following periods: $27.5 million for
2018, $25.4 million for 2019, $24.4 million for 2020, $20.9 million for 2021, $17.0 million for 2022 and
$30.3 million thereafter. Expected future amortization expense is subject to fluctuations in foreign
exchange rates and assumes no future adjustments to acquired intangible assets.
Note 10 – Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded when the consideration paid for an acquisition of a business exceeds the fair value of
identifiable net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The following table summarizes the changes in
goodwill since January 31, 2015:
Balance at beginning of period
Acquisition of Airclic
Acquisition of MK Data
Acquisition of BearWare
Acquisition of Oz
Acquisition of Pixi
Acquisition of Appterra
Acquisition of 4Solutions
Acquisition of Datamyne
Adjustments on account of foreign exchange
Balance at end of period
74
January 31, January 31,
2016
147,440
810
51,108
4,958
17,637
-
-
-
-
(4,467)
217,486
2017
217,486
-
-
-
-
6,705
3,766
1,351
35,115
(1,310)
263,113
Note 11 - Accrued Liabilities
Accrued compensation and benefits
Accrued professional fees
Other accrued liabilities
January 31,
2017
14,786
864
7,597
23,247
January 31,
2016
10,700
1,211
4,933
16,844
Other accrued liabilities include accrued expenses related to third party resellers and royalties, suppliers,
accrued restructuring charges and accrued contingent acquisition purchase consideration.
Note 12 - Debt
On March 2, 2016, we amended our revolving debt facility with a new senior secured credit facility. The
credit facility consists of a $150.0 million revolving operating credit facility to be available for general
corporate purposes including the financing of ongoing working capital needs and acquisitions. The credit
facility also provides for an additional $7.5 million available to support foreign exchange and interest rate
hedging. The credit facility has a five-year maturity with no fixed repayment dates prior to the end of the
five-year term. Borrowings under the facility are secured by a first charge over substantially all of
Descartes’ assets. Depending on the type of advance, interest rates under the revolving operating credit
facility are based on the Canada or US prime rate, Bankers’ Acceptance (BA) or London Interbank Offered
Rate (LIBOR) plus an additional 0 to 200 basis points based on the ratio of net debt to adjusted earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as defined in the credit agreement. A standby fee
of between 20 to 28 basis points will be charged on all undrawn amounts. The credit facility contains
certain customary representations, warranties and guarantees, and covenants. As at January 31, 2017,
$150.0 million of the revolving operating credit facility remains available for use. No amounts have been
drawn on the facility available to support foreign exchange and interest rate hedging. We are in compliance
with the covenants of the credit facility as at January 31, 2017.
As at January 31, 2017, we have outstanding letters of credit of approximately $0.3 million primarily
related to our leased premises ($0.3 million as at January 31, 2016) which are not related to our credit
facility.
Note 13 - Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Commitments
The following information is provided in respect of our operating and capital lease obligations:
Years Ended January 31,
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Operating
Leases
4,880
3,597
2,099
1,026
481
320
157
145
144
12,849
Capital
Leases
144
53
47
2
-
-
-
-
-
246
Total
5,024
3,650
2,146
1,028
481
320
157
145
144
13,095
75
Lease Obligations
We are committed under non-cancelable operating leases for business premises, computer equipment and
vehicles with terms expiring at various dates through 2026. We are also committed under non-cancelable
capital leases for computer equipment expiring at various dates through 2021. The future minimum
amounts payable under these lease agreements are outlined in the chart above. The $0.2 million balance
of the capital lease obligation outstanding at January 31, 2017 is included in accrued liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheet. Rental expense from operating leases was $4.9 million, $4.4 million and $5.2
million for the years ended January 31, 2017, January 31, 2016 and January 31, 2015, respectively.
Other Obligations
As described in Note 2 to these consolidated financial statements, we maintain deferred share unit (“DSU”)
and cash-settled restricted share unit (“CRSU”) plans for our non-employee directors and employees. Any
payments made pursuant to these plans are settled in cash. For DSUs and CRSUs, the units vest over
time and the liability recognized at any given consolidated balance sheet date reflects only those units
vested at that date that have not yet been settled in cash. As such, we had an unrecognized aggregate
liability for the unvested CRSUs and DSUs of $0.9 million and nil, respectively, for which no liability was
recorded on our consolidated balance sheet at January 31, 2017, in accordance with ASC Topic 718,
“Compensation – Stock Compensation”. The ultimate liability for any payment of DSUs and CRSUs is
dependent on the trading price of our common shares. To partially offset our exposure to fluctuations in
our stock price, we have entered into equity derivative contracts, including floating-rate equity forwards.
Contingencies
We are subject to a variety of other claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course
of our business. The consequences of these matters are not presently determinable but, in the opinion of
management after consulting with legal counsel, the ultimate aggregate potential liability is not currently
expected to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.
Product Warranties
In the normal course of operations, we provide our customers with product warranties relating to the
performance of our hardware, software and network services. To date, we have not encountered material
costs as a result of such obligations and have not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in our
consolidated financial statements.
Business combination agreements
In respect of our acquisition of Appterra in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, up to $1.6 million in cash may
become payable if certain revenue performance targets are met by Appterra in the two years following
the acquisition. A balance of $0.7 million is accrued related to this contingent consideration as at January
31, 2017.
Guarantees
In the normal course of business we enter into a variety of agreements that may contain features that
meet the definition of a guarantee under ASC Topic 460, “Guarantees”. The following lists our significant
guarantees:
Intellectual property indemnification obligations
We provide indemnifications of varying scope to our customers against claims of intellectual property
infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products. In the event of such a claim, we
are generally obligated to defend our customers against the claim and we are liable to pay damages and
costs assessed against our customers that are payable as part of a final judgment or settlement. These
intellectual property infringement indemnification clauses are not generally subject to any dollar limits and
remain in force for the term of our license agreement with our customer, which license terms are typically
perpetual. Historically, we have not encountered material costs as a result of such indemnifications.
76
Other indemnification agreements
In the normal course of operations, we enter into various agreements that provide general indemnities.
These indemnities typically arise in connection with purchases and sales of assets, securities offerings or
buy-backs, service contracts, administration of employee benefit plans, retention of officers and directors,
membership agreements, customer financing transactions, and leasing transactions. In addition, our
corporate by-laws provide for the indemnification of our directors and officers. Each of these indemnities
requires us, in certain circumstances, to compensate the counterparties for various costs resulting from
breaches of representations or obligations under such arrangements, or as a result of third party claims
that may be suffered by the counterparty as a consequence of the transaction. We believe that the
likelihood that we could incur significant liability under these obligations is remote. Historically, we have
not made any significant payments under such indemnities.
In evaluating estimated losses for the guarantees or indemnities described above, we consider such factors
as the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of
the amount of loss. We are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount
payable under such guarantees or indemnities as many of these arrangements do not specify a maximum
potential dollar exposure or time limitation. The amount also depends on the outcome of future events
and conditions, which cannot be predicted. Given the foregoing, to date, we have not accrued any liability
in our financial statements for the guarantees or indemnities described above.
Note 14 – Share Capital
On April 18, 2016, we filed a final short-form base shelf prospectus, allowing us to offer and issue the
following securities: (i) common shares; (ii) preferred shares; (iii) senior or subordinated unsecured debt
securities; (iv) subscription receipts; (v) warrants; and (vi) securities comprised of more than one of the
aforementioned common shares, preferred shares, debt securities, subscription receipts and/ or warrants
offered together as a unit. These securities may be offered separately or together, in separate series, in
amounts, at prices and on terms to be set forth in one or more shelf prospectus supplements. The
aggregate initial offering price of securities that may be sold by us (or certain of our current or future
shareholders) pursuant to our base shelf prospectus during the 25-month period that our base shelf
prospectus, including any amendments thereto, remains valid is limited to $500 million. The short-form
base shelf prospectus expires on May 18, 2018.
The following table sets forth the common shares outstanding (number of shares in thousands):
(thousands of shares)
Balance, beginning of year
Shares issued:
Stock options and share units exercised
Issuance of common shares
Acquisitions (Note 3)
Balance, end of year
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
63,661
2017
75,761
2016
75,480
114
-
-
75,875
281
-
-
75,761
478
10,925
416
75,480
Cash flows provided from stock options and share units exercised during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was
approximately $0.6 million, $0.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively.
77
Note 15 - Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) (number of
shares in thousands):
Year Ended
January 31,
2017
January 31,
2016
January 31,
2015
Net income for purposes of calculating basic and diluted
earnings per share
Weighted average shares outstanding
Dilutive effect of employee stock options
Dilutive effect of restricted and performance share units
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares
outstanding
Earnings per share
Basic
Diluted
23,838
20,562
15,059
75,800
230
485
75,595
452
362
70,559
665
360
76,515
76,409
71,584
0.31
0.31
0.27
0.27
0.21
0.21
For the years ended January 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, 25,000, nil and nil options were
excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS as those options had an exercise price greater than or equal
to the average market value of our common shares during the applicable periods and their inclusion would
have been anti-dilutive.
Additionally, for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, the application of the treasury stock method excluded
145,932, nil and 215,000 options, restricted and performance share units from the calculation of diluted
EPS as the assumed proceeds from the unrecognized stock-based compensation expense that are
attributed to future service periods made such stock-based compensation anti-dilutive.
Note 16 - Stock-Based Compensation Plans
Total estimated stock-based compensation expense recognized in our consolidated statement of
operations was as follows:
Year Ended
Cost of revenues
Sales and marketing
Research and development
General and administrative
Effect on net income
January 31,
2017
40
81
14
1,887
2,022
January 31,
2016
24
41
-
1,512
1,577
January 31,
2015
45
70
2
1,426
1,543
Differences between how GAAP and applicable income tax laws treat the amount and timing of recognition
of stock-based compensation expense may result in a deferred tax asset. We have recorded a valuation
allowance against any such deferred tax asset except for $0.1 million ($0.1 million at January 31, 2016)
recognized in the United States. The tax benefit realized in connection with stock options exercised and
settled during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was nominal, $1.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
Stock Options
As of January 31, 2017, we had 351,321 stock options granted and outstanding under our shareholder-
approved stock option plan and 4,546,332 remained available for grant. In addition, we had 175,000 stock
78
options outstanding pursuant to option grants made outside of our shareholder-approved stock option
plan as permitted under the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange in certain circumstances.
For the year ended January 31, 2017, the Company settled nil options. For the year ended January 31,
2016, the Company settled 446,875 options for $4.4 million of common shares issued from treasury and
$2.6 million in cash related to payment of applicable employee withholding taxes. For the year ended
January 31, 2015, the Company settled 175,000 options for $0.4 million in cash related to payment of
applicable employee withholding taxes and $0.3 million of common shares issued from treasury.
As of January 31, 2017, $0.8 million of total unrecognized compensation costs, net of forfeitures, related
to non-vested stock option awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.2
years. The total fair value of stock options vested during 2017 was $0.4 million.
The total number of options granted during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was 170,932, nil and 215,000,
respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during 2017, 2016 and 2015
was $4.46, nil and $3.47 per option, respectively.
The weighted-average assumptions were as follows:
Year Ended
Expected dividend yield (%)
Expected volatility (%)
Risk-free rate (%)
Expected option life (years)
January
31, 2017
January
31, 2016
January
31, 2015
-
25.2
0.6
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
25.4
1.5
5
A summary of option activity under all of our plans is presented as follows:
Balance at January 31, 2015
Exercised
Surrendered for Shares
Balance at January 31, 2016
Granted
Exercised
Balance at January 31, 2017
Number of
Stock Options
Outstanding
953,264
(37,500)
(446,875)
468,889
170,932
(113,500)
526,321
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
$6.33
$4.18
$2.59
$8.25
$19.06
$4.93
$12.36
Vested or expected to vest at January 31,
2017
505,228
$12.20
Exercisable at January 31, 2017
286,529
$9.88
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
2.5
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in millions)
10.6
3.5
5.2
4.2
4.9
4.2
3.3
4.7
3.3
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was approximately $1.8 million,
$0.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options surrendered for shares
during 2017, 2016 and 2015 was approximately nil, $6.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively.
79
Options outstanding and options exercisable as at January 31, 2017 by range of exercise price are as
follows:
Range of Exercise Prices
$4.80 – $5.45
$6.79 – $6.79
$11.50 - $11.66
$18.81 – $20.45
Options Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$4.84
$6.79
$11.65
$19.05
$12.36
Number of
Stock
Options
108,389
32,000
215,000
170,932
526,321
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
1.1
2.4
4.4
6.3
4.2
Options Exercisable
Number of
Stock
Options
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$4.84
$6.79
$11.65
$18.81
$9.88
108,389
24,000
105,500
48,640
286,529
A summary of the status of our unvested stock options under our shareholder-approved stock option plan
as of January 31, 2017 is presented as follows:
Balance at January 31, 2015
Vested
Balance at January 31, 2016
Granted
Vested
Balance at January 31, 2017
Number of
Stock Options
Outstanding
123,854
(70,276)
53,578
170,932
(72,218)
152,292
Weighted-
Average Grant-
Date Fair Value
per Share
$2.56
$1.92
$2.52
$4.46
$3.70
$4.12
The above-noted table excludes the 175,000 options granted, with the permission of the Toronto Stock
Exchange, pursuant to terms other than our shareholder approved stock option plan.
80
Performance Share Units
A summary of PSU activity is as follows:
Balance at January 31, 2015
Granted
Performance units issued
Balance at January 31, 2016
Granted
Performance units issued
Balance at January 31, 2017
Number of
PSUs
Outstanding
174,258
49,187
30,092
253,537
54,480
29,630
337,647
Weighted-
Average
Granted Date
Fair Value
$12.61
$19.70
$9.34
$12.39
$23.37
$9.26
$13.73
Vested or expected to vest at January 31,
2017
337,647
$13.73
Exercisable at January 31, 2017
233,980
$10.30
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
7.9
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in millions)
3.0
7.2
4.9
6.6
7.3
6.6
5.8
7.3
5.0
The aggregate intrinsic values represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the aggregate closing share
price of our common shares on January 31, 2017) that would have been received by PSU holders if all
PSUs had been vested on January 31, 2017.
As of January 31, 2017, $1.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested
awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years. The total fair value of
PSUs vested during 2017 was $1.2 million.
Restricted Share Units
A summary of RSU activity is as follows:
Balance at January 31, 2015
Granted
Balance at January 31, 2016
Granted
Balance at January 31, 2017
Number of
RSUs
Outstanding
175,592
49,187
224,779
38,456
263,235
Weighted-
Average
Granted Date
Fair Value
$9.94
$15.33
$10.03
$18.81
$11.17
Vested or expected to vest at January 31,
2017
263,235
$11.17
Exercisable at January 31, 2017
221,201
$10.00
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
7.9
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in millions)
3.1
7.4
6.7
6.7
6.4
4.3
5.7
5.7
4.8
The aggregate intrinsic values represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the aggregate closing share
price of our common shares on January 31, 2017) that would have been received by RSU holders if all
RSUs had been vested on January 31, 2017.
81
As of January 31, 2017, $0.7 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested
awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years. The total fair value of
RSUs vested during 2017 was $0.7 million.
Deferred Share Unit Plan
As at January 31, 2017, the total number of DSUs held by participating directors was 241,482 (188,766
at January 31, 2016), representing an aggregate accrued liability of $5.2 million ($3.3 million at January
31, 2016). During 2017, 52,716 DSUs were granted. As at January 31, 2017, the unrecognized aggregate
liability for the unvested DSUs was nil (nil at January 31, 2016). The fair value of the DSU liability is based
on the closing price of our common shares at the balance sheet date. The total compensation cost related
to DSUs recognized in our consolidated statements of operations was approximately $1.6 million, $1.9
million and $1.5 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Cash-Settled Restricted Share Unit Plan
A summary of activity under our CRSU plan is as follows:
Balance at January 31, 2015
Granted
Vested and settled in cash
Balance at January 31, 2016
Granted
Vested and settled in cash
Balance at January 31, 2017
Non-vested at January 31, 2017
Number of
CRSUs
Outstanding
113,856
72,817
(85,924)
100,749
43,218
(66,638)
77,329
77,329
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
1.5
1.6
1.4
1.4
We recognize the compensation cost of the CRSUs ratably over the service/vesting period relating to the
grant and have recorded an aggregate accrued liability of $0.8 million at January 31, 2017 ($0.8 million
at January 31, 2016). As at January 31, 2017, the unrecognized aggregate liability for the unvested CRSUs
was $0.9 million ($1.0 million at January 31, 2016). The fair value of the CRSU liability is based on the
closing price of our common shares at the balance sheet date. The total compensation cost related to
CRSUs recognized in our consolidated statements of operations was approximately $0.8 million, $0.7
million and $0.6 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
82
Note 17 - Income Taxes
Income before income taxes is earned in the following tax jurisdictions:
Year Ended
Canada
United States
Other countries
Income tax expense is incurred in the following jurisdictions:
Year Ended
Current income tax expense
Canada
United States
Other countries
Deferred income tax expense (recovery)
Canada
United States
Other countries
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
2017
2016
19,560
2,670
9,270
31,500
13,933
4,773
9,064
27,770
14,489
6,300
1,032
21,821
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
2017
2016
447
873
2,702
4,022
4,251
1,272
(1,883)
3,640
7,662
94
70
1,279
1,443
3,493
800
1,472
5,765
7,208
568
1,060
1,156
2,784
3,741
2,144
(1,907)
3,978
6,762
Income tax expense for 2017, 2016 and 2015 was 24%, 26% and 31% of income before income taxes,
respectively, with current income tax expense being 13%, 5% and 13% of income before income taxes,
respectively.
Current tax expense increased in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to a $1.7 million increase in
expenses not deductible for tax purposes, an increase of $0.7 million attributable to changes in the
estimate of our uncertain tax positions partially offset by an increase of $0.5 million in adjustments in
respect to income tax of previous periods. Current tax expense decreased in 2016 compared to 2015
primarily due to a decrease in taxable income in the US as a result of tax benefits related to stock option
exercises.
Deferred income tax expense decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to changes in estimates
of valuation allowances partially offset by the effect of tax rate reductions against certain deferred tax
assets in EMEA. Deferred income tax expense increased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to
additional valuation allowance in EMEA and a tax rate reduction in certain jurisdictions.
83
The components of the deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
Assets
Accruals not currently deductible
Accumulated net operating losses
Corporate minimum taxes
Research and development and other tax credits and expenses
Other timing differences
Total deferred income tax assets
Liabilities
Difference between tax and accounting basis of intangible assets
Difference between tax and accounting basis of property and equipment
Uncertain tax positions incurred in loss years
Total deferred income tax liabilities
Net deferred income taxes
Valuation allowance
Net deferred income taxes, net of valuation allowance
January 31, January 31,
2016
2017
11,975
17,571
1,767
3,424
683
35,420
(23,393)
(2,655)
(205)
(26,253)
9,167
(12,115)
(2,948)
8,653
19,859
1,589
2,885
924
33,910
(9,584)
700
(356)
(9,240)
24,670
(13,963)
10,707
As at January 31, 2017, we have not accrued for foreign withholding taxes and Canadian income taxes
applicable to approximately $188.6 million of unremitted earnings of subsidiaries operating outside of
Canada. These earnings, which we consider to be invested indefinitely, will become subject to these taxes
if and when they are remitted as dividends or if we sell our stock in the subsidiaries. If we decide to
repatriate the foreign earnings, we would need to adjust our income tax provision in the period we
determined that the earnings will no longer be indefinitely invested outside Canada.
The provision (recovery) for income taxes varies from the expected provision at the statutory rates for
the reasons detailed in the table below:
Year Ended
Net income before taxes
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
21,821
2016
27,770
31,500
2017
Combined basic Canadian statutory rates
26.5%
26.5%
26.5%
Income tax expense based on the above rates
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
Permanent differences including amortization of intangible
assets
Effect of differences between Canadian and foreign tax rates
Effect of rate changes on current year timing differences
Adjustments relating to previous periods
Increase (decrease) in tax reserves
Valuation allowance
Stock compensation
Deferred tax charges
Other, including foreign exchange
Income tax expense
8,347
7,359
5,783
(882)
(2,593)
800
213
495
(431)
492
(1,580)
351
400
257
7,662
169
1,150
36
(172)
(41)
345
270
685
7,208
1,007
-
9
(41)
(1,195)
86
-
313
6,762
84
We have income tax loss carryforwards which expire as follows:
Expiry year
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
United
States
-
1,766
-
-
-
11,945
13,711
EMEA Asia Pacific
-
-
671
83
-
6,795
7,549
283
-
-
-
-
54,762
55,045
Total
283
1,766
671
83
-
73,502
76,305
The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total estimated liability associated with uncertain tax
positions taken:
Liability, beginning of year
Gross increases – current period
Lapsing due to statutes of limitations
Liability, end of year
2017
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
6,211
825
(1,315)
5,721
2016
5,721
1,967
(1,920)
5,768
5,768
1,939
(1,319)
6,388
We have identified accruals of $6.4 million with respect to uncertain tax positions as at January 31, 2017.
It is possible that these uncertain tax positions will not be realized in which case up to $6.0 million of the
recorded liability will decrease the effective tax rate in future years if this liability is reversed. We believe
that it is reasonably possible that $0.3 million of the uncertain tax positions could decrease tax expense
in the next 12 months relating primarily to tax years becoming statute barred for purposes of future tax
examinations by local taxing jurisdictions.
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a current tax expense.
As at January 31, 2017 and January 31, 2016, the unrecognized tax positions have resulted in no material
liability for estimated interest and penalties.
Descartes and our subsidiaries file their tax returns as prescribed by the tax laws of the jurisdictions within
which they operate. We are no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities in our major
tax jurisdictions as follows:
Tax Jurisdiction
United States Federal
Canada
United Kingdom
Sweden
Norway
Netherlands
Belgium
Note 18 – Deferred Tax Charge
Years No Longer Subject to
Audit
2013 and prior
2013 and prior
2013 and prior
2012 and prior
2016 and prior
2014 and prior
2013 and prior
During 2016, we had internal re-organizations related to intellectual property in some of our
subsidiaries. The tax impact related to the reorganizations has been recorded as a deferred charge and
is being amortized to income tax expense over the remaining estimated useful life of the intellectual
property. Deferred tax charges are amortized to income tax expense over a period of 3 to 8 years.
85
Note 19 - Other Charges
Other charges are comprised of acquisition-related costs and restructuring initiatives which have been
undertaken from time to time under various restructuring plans. Acquisition-related costs primarily include
retention bonuses to employees joining by way of an acquisition, advisory services, brokerage services
and administrative costs, and collectively relate to completed and prospective acquisitions.
The following tables shows the components of other charges as follows:
Year Ended
Acquisition-related costs
Fiscal 2017 restructuring plan
Fiscal 2015 restructuring plan
Other restructuring plans
Executive departure charges
Fiscal 2017 Restructuring Plan
January 31,
2017
3,019
427
9
-
-
3,455
January 31,
2016
January 31,
2015
1,416
-
50
26
-
1,492
1,666
-
715
99
396
2,876
In the third quarter of 2017, management approved and began to implement the fiscal 2017 restructuring
plan to reduce operating expenses and increase operating margins. To date, $0.4 million has been
recorded within other charges in conjunction with this restructuring plan. These charges are comprised of
workforce reduction charges and office closure costs. This plan is substantially complete with a nominal
amount of further expected costs.
The following table shows the changes in the restructuring provision for the fiscal 2017 restructuring plan.
Balance at January 31, 2016
Accruals and adjustments
Cash draw downs
Foreign exchange
Balance at January 31, 2017
Fiscal 2015 Restructuring Plan
Workforce
Reduction
-
309
(308)
(1)
-
Office Closure
Costs
-
118
(30)
-
88
Total
-
427
(338)
(1)
88
In the fourth quarter of 2015, management approved and began to implement the fiscal 2015 restructuring
plan to reduce operating expenses and increase operating margins. To date, $0.8 million has been
recorded within other charges in conjunction with this restructuring plan. These charges are comprised of
workforce reduction charges, office closure costs and other costs. This plan is complete with no further
expected costs.
86
The following table shows the changes in the restructuring provision for the fiscal 2015 restructuring plan.
Balance at January 31, 2015
Accruals and adjustments
Cash draw downs
Balance at January 31, 2016
Accruals and adjustments
Cash draw downs
Balance at January 31, 2017
Note 20 - Segmented Information
Workforce
Reduction
226
24
(250)
-
-
-
-
Office Closure
Costs
220
14
(93)
141
9
(89)
61
Other Costs
-
12
(12)
-
-
-
-
Total
446
50
(355)
141
9
(89)
61
We review our operating results, assess our performance, make decisions about resources, and generate
discrete financial information at the single enterprise level. Accordingly, we have determined that we
operate in one reportable business segment providing logistics technology solutions. The following tables
provide our revenue information by geographic location of customer and revenue type:
Year Ended
Revenues
United States
Europe, Middle-East and Africa
Canada
Asia Pacific
Year Ended
Revenues
Services
Licenses
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
2017
2016
106,672
75,165
13,266
8,676
203,779
96,300
68,451
12,572
7,670
184,993
73,810
72,900
15,187
8,963
170,860
January 31, January 31, January 31,
2015
2017
2016
196,867
6,912
203,779
176,288
8,705
184,993
159,050
11,810
170,860
Services revenues are composed of the following: (i) ongoing transactional and/or subscription fees for
use of our services and products by our customers; (ii) professional services revenues from consulting,
implementation and training services related to our services and products; (iii) maintenance and other
related revenues, which include revenues associated with maintenance and support of our services and
products; and (iv) hardware revenues. License revenues derive from licenses granted to our customers to
use our software products.
The following table provides information by geographic area of operation for our long-lived assets. Long-
lived assets represent property and equipment and intangible assets that are attributed to geographic
areas.
87
Total long-lived assets
United States
Europe, Middle-East and Africa
Canada
January 31,
2017
January 31,
2016
71,805
40,872
43,215
155,892
49,192
44,963
48,011
142,166
88
CORPORATE INFORMATION
Stock Exchange Information
Our common stock trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange
under the symbol DSG and on The Nasdaq Stock Market
under the symbol DSGX.
Transfer Agents
Computershare Investor Services Inc.
100 University Avenue
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Y1
North America: (800) 663-9097
Phone: (416) 263-9200
Computershare Trust Company
12039 West Alameda Parkway
Suite Z-2 Lakewood, Colorado
80228 USA
Phone: (303) 262-0600
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
KPMG LLP
Bay Adelaide Centre
333 Bay Street
Suite 4600
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2S5
Phone: (416) 777-8500
Investor Inquiries
Investor Relations
The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
120 Randall Drive
Waterloo, Ontario N2V 1C6
Phone: (519) 746-8110 ext. 202358
Toll Free: (800) 419-8495
E-mail: investor@descartes.com
www.descartes.com
The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
Corporate Headquarters
120 Randall Drive
Waterloo, Ontario N2V 1C6
Canada
Phone: (519) 746-8110
(800) 419-8495
Fax: (519) 747-0082
info@descartes.com
www.descartes.com