Quarterlytics / easyjet

easyjet

ezj · LSE
Claim this profile
Ticker ezj
Exchange LSE
Sector
Industry
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2021 Annual Report · easyjet
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Fast track 
THE RECOVERY

Annual Report and 
Accounts 2021

Who we are

easyJet aims to make travel easy, 
enjoyable and affordable for customers, 
whether it is for leisure or business. 

We use our cost advantage and leading 
positions in primary airports to deliver low 
fares on an unrivalled network, seamlessly 
connecting Europe with the warmest 
welcome in the sky. 

Our well-established and proven business 
model provides a strong foundation to 
drive long term shareholder returns.

‘Our promise’ is that we will be:

Safe and responsible

On our customers’ side

In it together

Always efficient

Forward thinking

Navigating 2021
The 2021 financial year has been volatile with 
Covid-19 posing the most significant threat to 
the aviation industry in its history. 

Our business model and actions undertaken  
in the year mean that we are poised to  
take advantage of growth opportunities  
in the future.

easyJet has an outstanding network of #1 and 
#2 positions in the primary airports around 
Europe, which customers favour. Customers  
are increasingly looking for value for money  
and are prioritising leisure travel, where we  
are particularly well placed.

We were the world’s first major airline to offset 
the carbon emissions from the fuel used for all 
flights and we continue to work tirelessly to 
minimise carbon across our operations. 

VISIT OUR WEBSITE FOR MORE 
INVESTOR INFORMATION

https://corporate.easyJet.com/investors

A Tribute from the Board of Directors

John Barton

Shortly after the signing of the annual report and accounts  
on 30 November 2021, John Barton sadly passed away.  
John was our Chairman for nearly nine years, and only  
stepped down from the Board on 1 December.

John was a man of great integrity who was very much 
respected and liked by everyone across the Company.  
He was a distinguished Chair and made an outstanding 
contribution to the Company during his tenure.

On behalf of all of his former colleagues at easyJet and the 
Board, we send our heartfelt sympathies to John's family. 

He will be remembered with greatest respect and admiration.

6 December 2021

What’s inside

Strategic report

Chairman’s Letter

Highlights

Purpose

Chief Executive’s Review

Business Model

Interview With Our Chairman, 
CEO, and CFO

Market Review

Our Strategy

Key Performance Indicators

Stakeholder Engagement

Sustainability

Non-Financial Information 
Statement

Financial Review

Risk

Governance

Chairman’s Statement on  
Corporate Governance

Board of Directors

Airline Management Board

Corporate Governance Report

Directors’ Remuneration Report

Directors’ Report

Statement of Directors’ 
Responsibilities 

Financials

Independent Auditors’ Report to 
the Members of easyJet plc

Consolidated Accounts 

Notes to the Accounts 

Company Accounts 

Notes to the Consolidated 
Company Accounts

Five-Year Summary 

Glossary – Alternative 
Performance Measures 

Glossary 

Shareholder Information

2

4

6

8

12

14

16

18

24

26

38

62

66

78

96

98

102

105

130

154

158

159

170

175

213

216

219

220

222

223

www.easyJet.com

1

C H AIRMAN’S LETT ER

Positioned for 
success

The pandemic continued to cast a shadow 
over the whole aviation sector throughout 
the 2021 financial year with easyJet being 
unable to operate its fleet to anywhere 
near its full potential. This has put the 
whole company under considerable 
stress both operationally and financially. 

Operationally we have continued to put a 
disciplined focus on cash generative flying, 
which has made running the flight schedule 
extremely challenging and clearly has had 
some impact on our customers. Financially 
we continued, in the early part of the year, 
to raise money through sale and leaseback 
deals on our largely owned fleet and 
increased borrowings. Of course, this put 
everyone in the business under pressure, 
added to which the necessary redundancy 
programme has made navigating our 
way through the year very challenging. 

Despite these difficult times easyJet 
has maintained focus on preparing for 
post-pandemic conditions and driving 
the business forward.

Results
The continued restrictions on travel 
imposed by governments in response to 
Covid-19 have had a devastating impact 
on air travel. Our focus has been on cash 
generative flying to minimise cash burn 

while there was continued uncertainty due 
to the constantly changing environment. 
Travel restrictions were eased across much 
of Europe for the summer period where 
easyJet successfully maintained a rapid 
approach to match capacity to available 
demand, especially across UK domestics 
and mainland Europe. 

The relaxation of restrictions in the fourth 
quarter was positive for easyJet, showing 
that the industry is moving forward and 
that easyJet is playing a significant role 
in this, with encouraging capacity levels 
and positive load factor momentum 
throughout the summer period. Capacity 
levels versus the 2019 financial year in the 
quarters were 18%, 9%, 17% and 58% which 
demonstrates the momentum building 
in the fourth quarter.

Revenue for the full year decreased 
to £1,458 million (2020: £3,009 million). 
The Group reported a headline loss before 
tax of £1,136 million (2020: £835 million) 
and basic headline loss per share 
of 166.9 pence (2020: 149.7 pence). 
Total loss before tax of £1,036 million 
(2020: £1,273 million) and a non-headline 
gain of £100 million (2019: £438 million 
loss) led to basic total loss per share of 
159.0 pence (2020: 222.9 pence). 

Dividends
easyJet’s dividend policy has been to pay 
shareholders 50% of headline profit after 
tax. Given that we made a loss this year, 
there will be no dividend paid for the 
2021 financial year (2020: nil). The 
dividend policy will be reviewed by the 
Board during the 2022 financial year. 

Balance Sheet
As we went through the first part of the 
year, the balance sheet came under 
pressure as we borrowed a significant 
amount. Despite this, we managed to 
maintain an investment grade balance 
sheet with the ratings agencies. The 
rights issue in September considerably 
reduced this pressure, although not 
returning us all the way back to our 
position pre-pandemic. The rights issue 
had a take up rate of over 93% which is 
an indication of the market’s confidence 
in the financial strength of the Company.

Our strong business model, 
liquidity and unparalleled network 
mean we are well positioned for 
growth as we enter the recovery. 
John Barton
Non-Executive Chairman

2

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Our Board
There have been a number of changes to 
our Board during the year. Andrew Findlay 
stood down as Chief Financial Officer in 
February 2021, and we welcomed Kenton 
Jarvis as his successor. David Robbie 
joined the Board as an Independent 
Non-Executive Director in November 
2020, and Charles Gurassa, Moya Greene 
DBE and Dr Anastassia Lauterbach stood 
down as Independent Non-Executive 
Directors in December 2020. 

Following a thorough search led by the 
Nominations Committee, Stephen Hester 
joined us as an Independent Non-Executive 
Director and Chair designate on 
1 September 2021 and will succeed me 
as Chair on 1 December 2021. This will 
therefore be my last report as your Chair, 
having served for nearly nine years on the 
Board. It has been a privilege to serve as 
Chair over that time, and I am proud of 
how easyJet has not only navigated 
through the pandemic but has adapted 
and built back stronger leaving it 
extremely well positioned for the future. 
I am delighted to handover to someone 
of Stephen Hester’s calibre, and have 
been working closely with him to ensure 
that there is a smooth transition. 

Further details of these changes are 
included in the Governance report on 
page 96. 

Our people
No praise can be high enough for our 
employees. They have navigated us 
through the most difficult period the 
aviation industry has ever seen. The 
pressure has been at every level in the 
company and I am extremely grateful for 
the hard work and dedication all of our 
employees have given to easyJet.

The future
This is my last Annual Report before I hand 
over to Stephen Hester. I feel I am leaving 
easyJet is in a strong position having 
navigated some stormy waters. The 
future is still unclear with the aftermath 
of Covid-19 still with us, however I believe 
our unique and established position in the 
industry and our strong financials has put 
easyJet is a great position to drive strong 
shareholder returns in the future.

John Barton
Non-Executive Chairman

There have also been a number of changes 
to the Airline Management Board. As 
mentioned above, we welcomed Kenton 
Jarvis as Chief Financial Officer, Stuart 
Birrell was appointed as Chief Data & 
Information Officer on 9 November 2020 
and Sophie Dekkers was appointed Chief 
Commercial Officer on 16 December 2020. 
The Governance report on pages 102 to 104 
sets out further detail on their experience.

Sustainability
Our overall sustainability goal is to lead and 
challenge global aviation towards net zero 
emissions while positively impacting our 
communities and our people. We continue 
to lead on this, as we committed to joining 
the Race to Zero while continuing to work 
on our Net Zero pathway to 2050.

We were the world’s first major airline to 
offset the carbon emissions from the fuel 
used for all of our flights, and we continue 
to work tirelessly to minimise the carbon 
impact of our operations. We are 
supporting the development of new 
technologies – including hybrid, electric 
and hydrogen aircraft – so we can play 
our part in reinventing aviation to be 
more sustainable in the future. I am pleased 
with the progress that I have seen during 
the year, for example, at Bristol where we 
achieved a 97% reduction in CO2 emissions 
during our emissions-free turnaround trial. 

No praise can be high 
enough for our employees. 
They have navigated us 
through the most difficult 
period the aviation industry 
has ever seen. 

www.easyJet.com

3

STRATEGIC REPORT  
HIGH LIGHTS

Our performance...

Results have been heavily impacted by Covid-19 related lockdowns  
and government travel restrictions during the 2021 financial year. 

Total (loss)/profit before tax (£m)

Headline (loss)/profit before 
tax (£m)

(1,036)
(1,036)
(1,036)

(1,273)
(1,273)

2021

2021

2020

(1,136)
(1,136)
(1,136)

(835)
(835)

2021

2021

2020

2020

2019

2018

2017

430430

445445

385385

2019

2018

2017

Total revenue (£m)

Total ancillary revenue (£m)

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

1,458
1,458
1,458

3,009
3,009

6,385
6,385

5,898
5,898

5,047
5,047

2021

2020

2019

2018

427427

578578

408408

458 458 458 

706706

1,376
1,376

1,2101,210

Basic total (loss)/earnings 
per share (pence) 

Basic headline (loss)/earnings 
per share (pence)

(159.0)
(159.0)

(222.9)*
(222.9)*

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

88.688.6

90.990.9

77.477.4

(166.9)
(166.9)

(149.7)*
(149.7)*

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

88.788.7

118.3
118.3

82.582.5

*2020 figure restated due to 2021 rights issue

*2020 figure restated due to 2021 rights issue

Load factor

72.5%

2020: 87.2%

Seats flown

28.2m

2020: 55.1m

On-Time Performance

87%

2020: 84%

4

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

...And our strengths

Unparalleled 
network

Number of primary  
airports where we hold  
a #1 or #2 position1 

43

2020: 51

Low-cost  
model

Increase in fuel efficiency  
of neo aircraft compared  
to previous generation 
aircraft3

15%

Robust 
balance sheet

Cash & money 
market deposits2,5 

£3,536m

2020: £2,316m

Routes operated2

Cost savings4,9

Net debt2,8

927

2020: 981

£512m

2020: £73m

£910m

2020: £1,125m

Customer 
loyalty

Number one airline 
brand in the UK, 
France & Switzerland2,6

no.1 or 2

Returning customers4,7

80%

2020: 87%

On-Time 
Performance 
(OTP)

Arrivals within 15 minutes 

87%

2020: 84%

Customer 
satisfaction

Customer satisfaction 
score2 

75%

2020: 75%

1.  As at 30 September 2021 fewer airports 

closed. Airports where easyJet is the number 
one or number two carrier based on short-haul 
capacity. 2020 has been restated

2.  As at 30 September 2021
3.  A320neo versus previous generation A320
4. In the year ended 30 September 2021
5.  Excluding restricted cash
6.  Millward Brown brand tracker

7.  Percentage of seats booked by customers 
who made a booking in the preceding 
24 months

8.  Within net debt, borrowings of £300 million 

and lease liabilities of £189 million are payable 
within one year

9.  Incremental cost savings versus 2020, 

including sustainable and tactical management 
actions

www.easyJet.com

5

STRATEGIC REPORT  
 
PUR POSE

Positioned for the future

Our purpose

Strategic priorities

Our purpose defines who we  
are and guides our actions  
and decisions.

Seamlessly connecting 
Europe with the warmest 
welcome in the sky

easyJet aims to make travel easy, 
enjoyable and affordable, whether 
it is for leisure or business.

Our promise

We have a set of values which 
support and guide our strategy.

Safe and  
responsible

On our  
customers’ side

In it  
together

Always  
efficient

Forward  
thinking

6

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

easyJet has prioritised six strategic initiatives that 
will continue to build on our structural advantages 
in the European aviation market and enable us to 
lead the recovery as travel returns.

These initiatives, underpinned by operational  
and digital safety and a continued focus on our 
people, will result in strong shareholder returns 
being delivered.

Network strategy

for more details please see page 19

Customer excellence

for more details please see page 20

Product portfolio evolution

for more details please see page 21

easyJet holidays

for more details please see page 21

Cost focus 

for more details please see page 22

Sustainability

for more details please see page 23

Our Sustainability Strategy

To lead and challenge global aviation towards  
net zero emissions while positively impacting  
our communities and our people

Tackling  
carbon 
emissions
We were the world’s first major airline 
to offset the carbon emissions from the 
fuel used for all our flights, and continue 
to work tirelessly to minimise carbon 
across our operations

Stimulating  
technological  
innovation

We are supporting the development 
of new technologies to achieve the 
decarbonisation of aviation as 
quickly as possible 

•  Offsetting the carbon emissions 

•  Champion and collaborate to 

from fuel and operations

•  Continuously reduce the carbon 

intensity of our flying

•  Advocate smarter regulation  

for aviation that rewards 
carbon efficiency

achieve our goal of zero emissions 
aviation

•  Be an informed adopter of 

Sustainable Aviation Fuels and 
advanced carbon capture 
technologies when available and 
commercially viable 

Going  
beyond 
carbon

We are working in a range of ways 
to take action on sustainability, 
beyond our carbon impact 

•  easyJet holidays strategy  
to ensure positive impact  
on the environment and  
local communities

•  Commit to waste and plastic 

reduction at easyJet and within 
our supply chain

•  Engage our colleagues and  

our customers in our 
sustainability journey

•  Diversity, Inclusion and Wellbeing 

Strategy

•  Support charitable causes that are 
important to our customers and 
employees

Improving our underlying capability

We have continued to strengthen our organisation structures and expertise on sustainability. Initiatives include: expanding  
the Sustainability team; increasing the scope of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) reporting; development of an  
ISO 14001-compliant Environmental Management System; and additional oversight through committees and working groups,  
such as the Environmental Management Review Board.

for more details please see our Sustainability section on page 38

How we measure (KPIs)
We measure our strategic progress through a mix of financial and non-financial KPIs.

Headline 
(loss)/profit 
before tax 
per seat

Headline  
(loss)/
earnings per 
share

Headline 
return on 
capital 
employed

Customer  
satisfaction

On-Time 
Performance

CO2 emissions 
per passenger 
kilometre

for more details please see our KPIs on page 24

www.easyJet.com

7

STRATEGIC REPORT  
C H IE F EXECUT IVE’S REVIEW

Fast tracking  
the recovery

Overview
It’s too soon to say what impact Omicron 
may have on European travel and any 
restrictions that may result. However, 
we have prepared ourselves for periods 
of uncertainty such as this. While we’ve 
seen an increase in transfers with some 
softening of trading for the first quarter it 
is really encouraging to see that we are still 
seeing good levels of new bookings for 
the second half and we still expect that 
the fourth quarter of the 2022 financial 
year will see a return to near pre-pandemic 
levels of capacity as people take their long 
awaited summer holidays.

easyJet has optimised its network and 
reallocated aircraft to higher contributing 
bases alongside the launch of two 
additional seasonal bases. Our new 
ancillary products are delivering now, 
utilising innovative, industry leading 
dynamic revenue management to optimise 
returns. We have completed significant 
structural cost savings through seasonal 
contracts and improved productivity, while 
helping our customers navigate travel 
during the pandemic with our industry 
leading flexible policies.

Having successfully strengthened the 
balance sheet, we are fast tracking 
strategic investment and growth 
opportunities to deliver strong, sustainable 
shareholder returns. This is demonstrated 
by slot increases at Gatwick as well as 
additional slots which we have obtained 
in Linate, Lisbon and Porto alongside 

the expansion of all seasonal bases in 
summer 2022. We will continue to focus on 
competing where it really matters, being 
relentlessly efficient and only investing 
where we can deliver strong, sustainable 
returns for our shareholders. 

easyJet operated a disciplined flying 
programme throughout the 2021 financial 
year whilst continuing to deliver cost 
savings across every area of the business. 
As a result of the continued impact of 
Covid-19, easyJet has reported a headline 
loss before tax of £1,136 million. 

Demand is accelerating with key periods 
such as October half term, ski and 
Christmas seeing strong performance. 
We continue to add capacity and expect 
to fly circa 70% of the 2019 financial year 
capacity in the second quarter of the 2022 
financial year and expect that the fourth 
quarter summer capacity will be at near 
the 2019 financial year levels. Customers 
will look for value as the economy recovers 
and short haul leisure demand will lead the 
recovery. easyJet will use its inherent 
strengths combined with the 
improvements made during the pandemic 
to grow throughout the recovery, which 
is already underway, and beyond.

Revenue
Total revenue decreased by 52% to 
£1,458 million (2020: £3,009 million) 
with capacity decreasing to 28.2 million 
seats (2020: 55.1 million) because of 
pandemic-related travel restrictions 

and national lockdowns compared to 
2020 where only the second half was 
impacted by the pandemic. 

Passenger revenue decreased by 57% to 
£1,000 million (2020: £2,303 million) as we 
flew an optimised schedule with a focus on 
domestic and continental Europe where there 
was the least amount of restrictions over 
travel. Passenger RPS (Revenue Per Seat) 
decreased by 15% to £35.48 (2020: £41.78). 

Ancillary revenue decreased by 35.1% 
to £458 million (2020: £706 million) as 
capacity reduced. However, ancillary 
revenue per seat increased by 20% to 
£15.06 (2020: £12.57) as we launched 
our new cabin bag proposition as well 
as our Standard Plus fare.

Costs 
Group headline costs excluding fuel and 
FX gains decreased by 29% to £2,232 
million (2020: £3,123 million), driven by a 
decrease in capacity flown and the material 
savings achieved across many areas of the 
business. easyJet has delivered £512 million 
of savings in the 2021 financial year as a 
result of the continued cost focus. 

The cost per seat performance was driven 
overwhelmingly by the impact of Covid-19, 
which has resulted in dramatic capacity 
reductions. Airline headline cost per seat at 
constant currency increased by 33.0% to 
£91.82 (2020: £69.03). Airline headline cost 
per seat excluding fuel and balance sheet 
revaluations at constant currency increased 
by 40.5% to £78.62 (2020: £55.94).

easyJet is emerging from the 
pandemic with renewed strength 
having transformed the business by 
optimising our network and flexibility, 
delivering significant cost savings 
while also step-changing ancillary 
revenue. 
Johan Lundgren
Chief Executive Officer 

8

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

easyJet will  
use its inherent 
strengths 
combined with  
the improvements 
made during the 
pandemic to grow 
throughout the 
recovery. 

Non-Headline Items
Non-headline items are material non-
recurring items or are items which do 
not reflect the trading performance of 
the business. These costs are separately 
disclosed and further detail can be 
found in the notes to the accounts. 

A Group non-headline gain of £100 million 
(2020: £438 million loss) was recognised 
in the year. This consisted of a; 

•  £65 million gain as a result of the sale 
and leaseback of 35 aircraft and 2 
engines during the year; 

•  £61 million credit in relation to our 

restructuring programme following 
constructive negotiations with our 
unions; offset by 

•  £26 million net charge related to  

hedge discontinuation.

Balance Sheet
easyJet maintained a disciplined approach 
to capacity and cash management. As a 
result, cash burn (on a fixed costs plus 
capex basis) during 2021 was £36 million 
per week on average, outperforming the 
guidance for £40 million per week.  

easyJet paid a further £455 million of customer 
refunds during 2021 (2020: £863 million). 

easyJet’s funding position remains strong 
with net debt as at 30 September 2021 
of £910 million (2020: £1,125 million). 
This comprised cash and money market 
deposits of £3,536 million (2020: £2,316 
million), debt of £3,367 million (2020: 
£2,731 million) and lease liabilities of 
£1,079 million (2020: £710 million). 

As at 30 September 2021 easyJet has 
unrestricted access to £4.4 billion of 
liquidity, comprising cash and cash 
equivalents plus the undrawn portion of the 
UKEF facility and an undrawn $400 million 
RCF. The remaining £300 million tranche of 
the CCFF was repaid in November 2021. 
easyJet has no other debt maturities 
outstanding until the 2023 financial year. 

Liquidity of £4.4 billion (2020: £2.5 billion), 
represents material headroom compared 
to our revised liquidity policy being 
unearned revenue plus £500 million.

Headline return on capital employed 
(ROCE) for 2021 fell to negative 25.5% 
(2020: negative 19.9%). Total ROCE is 
negative 22.4% (2020: negative 23.0%). 

Fleet
easyJet’s total fleet as at 30 September 2021 comprised 308 aircraft (30 September 2020: 342 aircraft) with the decrease driven 
principally by the redelivery to lessors of A319 aircraft. The average gauge of the fleet is now 178 seats per aircraft, compared to  
177 seats at 30 September 2020. The average age of the fleet increased slightly to 8.6 years (30 September 2020: 8.0 years). 

Fleet as at 30 September 2021:

A319
A320 
A320 neo
A321 neo

Percentage of total fleet

Owned

Leased

Total

% of fleet

Changes 
since Sep-20

Future 
deliveries

Purchase 
options

Purchase 
rights

45
105
30
3

183
59%

52
55
7
11

125
41%

97
160
37
14

308

31%
52%
12%
5%

(17)
(5)
–
–

(22)

–
–
104 1,2
162

120

–
–
61
–

6

–
–
531
–

53

1.  Includes the impact of Amendment to the purchase agreement with Airbus signed on 29 November 2021, which increased the number of firm future 

deliveries by 19, and reduced the number of purchase options by 14 and the number of purchase rights by 5.

2.  easyJet retains the option to alter the aircraft type of future deliveries, subject to providing sufficient notification to the OEM.

As at 30 September 2021, easyJet was storing 12 leased aircraft at zero rent unless flown. These aircraft are therefore not included within 
our fleet numbers published as part of the graphs outlining the fleet, but with footnotes to highlight the absence. 

Our flexible fleet plan allows us to expand or contract the size of the fleet depending upon the demand outlook.

Number of aircraft

Current contractual minimum
Base plan
Current contractual maximum
Expected deliveries

FY 2022

FY 2023

FY 2024

319
322
322
8

316
–
326
7

313
–
328
18

www.easyJet.com

9

STRATEGIC REPORT C H IE F EXECUT IVE’S REVIEW CONTINUE D

Capital Expenditure
Over the next three years easyJet’s 
gross capital expenditure is expected to 
be as follows: 

Gross capital 
expenditure 
(£ million)

FY22

FY23

FY24

c.900 c.1,000 c.1,300

Capex in the 2022 financial year is 
comprised of new Airbus fleet delivery 
payments, safety and maintenance-related 
expenditure as well as lease payments. 
Our capex projections assume eight 
aircraft deliveries in the 2022 financial year, 
seven deliveries in the 2023 financial year 
and 18 deliveries in the 2024 financial year. 

Our People 
Despite the challenges of Covid-19 and 
resulting restructuring, easyJet still has a 
strong reputation as an employer of choice. 
The high calibre of our people is a key 
source of differentiation for easyJet 
compared to our competitors, driving 
CSAT and customer loyalty. Our strong 
employer reputation attracts and retains 
engaged crew, with the spirit to deliver 
excellent service. Our Glassdoor rating of 
employee satisfaction is 4.2 (out of 5.0), 
which is the highest within the travel and 
hospitality sector, illustrating our market-
leading position in the labour market. 

The 2021 financial year has had a significant 
impact on our entire workforce and the 
pandemic has changed the way in which 
we support Our People. Some of the key 
changes and successes delivered include:

1.  Constructively worked in partnership 

with our employee representative bodies 
across Europe to avoid compulsory 
redundancies in most markets.

•  We have driven changes to right-size 

our crew establishment, having 
implemented agreements to improve 
our seasonality, reduce our crew costs 
(e.g. through changed contracts and 

pay-freezes) and improve productivity 
across our network. Whilst we have 
protected jobs where we see future 
growth and avoided expensive 
compulsory redundancy costs in 
most markets, the changes delivered 
will continue to support our focus 
on productivity in the future.

•  We’ve worked with local governments 
and union partners in order to claim 
£134 million in furlough support.
•  Prioritised growth in Spain and 

Portugal to give transfer opportunities 
for Our People who are at risk in 
other geographies.

2. Delivered hybrid working in a safe and 

secure way. 

•  Implemented biosecurity standards 
and initiatives to be aligned with 
those implemented for our 
customers and ensured a safe 
working environment for all.

•  Successfully implemented our new 
hybrid working model across our 
network. Over 84% of our affected 
employees feel positive about our 
approach to hybrid working. 

3. Set a platform for enhanced employee 
experience and improved our wellbeing 
and support 

•  Undertook multiple ‘You Matter’ 

campaigns to support the wellbeing 
of our people across the network. 
•  Implemented and refreshed a number 

of core employment policies e.g. 
Bullying and Harassment, Wellness 
and Absence in addition to providing 
training for people managers over 
these policies.

•  Completed our payroll project 

(HR Evolution) delivering 98% pay 
accuracy throughout the network. 
We continue to invest in building out 
capability in Workday (our HR 
software) to support employee 
self-service. 

EU Ownership
On 23 December 2020, easyJet 
announced that the Board had passed 
resolutions as part of its contingency plan 
to ensure continued compliance with 
EU ownership and control requirements 
following the end of the Brexit transition 
period on 31 December 2020. Accordingly, 
and in line with its contingency plan, 
easyJet announced on 4 January 2021 
that it had commenced steps to suspend 
voting rights in respect of certain shares 
held by relevant persons in accordance 
with easyJet’s articles of association, so 
that a majority of the voting rights in 
easyJet are held by EU persons. As at 
29 November 2021 the level of ownership 
by EU persons was 35.68%. Accordingly 
easyJet has suspended voting rights in 
respect of certain shares (‘Affected 
Shares’) held by Relevant Persons in 
accordance with easyJet’s articles of 
association (the ‘Articles’) so that a 
majority of the voting rights in easyJet are 
held by EU Persons. As at 29 November 
2021, a majority of the voting rights in 
easyJet are held by EU persons. 

Those shareholders who own shares 
whose voting rights will be suspended at 
the AGM will receive a notice (an ‘Affected 
Share Notice’) by post from Equiniti, our 
Registrars, on or around 14 January 2022 
notifying them of the suspension of voting 
rights in respect of their Affected Shares. 
Shareholders in receipt of an Affected 
Share Notice will not be entitled to 
attend, speak or vote at the AGM, in 
respect of those shares subject to an 
Affected Share Notice.

Note: ‘EU persons’ refers to nationals of 
EU member states plus Switzerland, 
Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein, but 
excludes the UK. ‘Relevant Persons’ has 
the meaning given to it in the Articles. 
In general terms, ‘Relevant Persons’ 
refers to non-EU nationals.

10 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Outlook
Based on current travel restrictions in 
the markets in which we operate, 
easyJet expects to fly circa 66% of 
the 2019 financial year capacity levels in 
the first quarter of the 2022 financial 
year with load factors expected to be circa 
81%. The second quarter of the 2022 
financial year capacity is expected to be 
circa 70% of the second quarter of the 
2019 financial year levels. 

easyJet has been ramping up capacity as 
customer confidence returns and current 
expectations are that the fourth quarter 

of the 2022 financial year capacity will 
have recovered to around the fourth 
quarter of the 2019 financial year 
capacity levels. 

The targets easyJet has set are; grow 
to pre-pandemic capacity by the 2023 
financial year, mid teen EBITDAR margins 
with low to mid teen ROCE in the medium 
term and having a clear roadmap for 
easyJet holidays to contribute £100 million 
plus profit before tax to the Group.

At this stage, given the continued level 
of short-term uncertainty, it would not 
be appropriate to provide any further 
financial guidance for the 2022 financial 
year. Customers are booking closer to 
departure and visibility remains limited. 

We see a unique 
opportunity for 
easyJet to win 
customers and 
take market share 
from rivals in this 
post pandemic 
period. 

www.easyJet.com

11

STRATEGIC REPORT BUSINESS MODEL

Our strong foundation

OUR RESOURCES

Financial capital
easyJet has a strong capital base, with a market capitalisation  
of £5.0 billion1 and a net debt position of £910 million at 
30 September 2021 (2020: £1,125 million). easyJet’s credit 
ratings are amongst the strongest in the world for an airline.

Aircraft
easyJet operates a modern fleet of Airbus A320 family aircraft, of 
which 59% are owned. We are investing in new generation aircraft 
which are more fuel efficient2,3 leading to lower operating costs 
and lower carbon emissions over time.

People
easyJet has a highly skilled workforce of over 13,000 people 
across Europe, including over 4,000 pilots and 7,000 cabin 
crew members.4

Suppliers
easyJet partners with key suppliers to deliver many of its 
operational and commercial activities. Our partners are carefully 
selected and significant emphasis is placed on managing these 
relationships, with the aim of encouraging incremental innovation 
and performance.

Slots and brand
easyJet has a valuable portfolio of slot pairs at slot-constrained 
primary airports, as well as flying rights across Europe and AOCs5 
in the UK, Switzerland and Austria. 

BBB- 
/Baa3

Credit rating

308

Aircraft4
2020: 342

OVER

13,000 

Employees4
2020: >14,000

42 

Average payment days
2020: 52

86%

Capacity at  
slot-constrained airports6
2020: 89%

Technology and data
easyJet is aiming to become the world’s most data-driven airline. 
We are seeing significant benefits already from operational 
resilience processes and predictive maintenance. Our revenues 
have been benefitting from data projects in late yield initiatives 
and dynamic seat pricing.

290m

Visits to all  
digital platforms
2020: 510m

1.  Based on share price of £6.62 at 30 September 2021
2.  15% fuel-saving per seat A320neo versus previous generation A320
3.  Around 50% quieter on take-off and landing than previous-generation aircraft
4. As at 30 September 2021

5.  Air Operator Certificates
6.  Based on level 2 and level 3 airports as updated by 
IATA on 21 October 2021 and defined under IATA 
Worldwide Slot Guidelines as at 1 June 2020

12

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Our robust business model makes it easy, affordable and 
sustainable for our customers to travel, which drives growth  
and returns for our shareholders.

Airports1

153

2020: 154

Routes1

927

2020: 981

BUSINESS ACTIVITIES

What we do
We are a low cost European 
point-to-point airline. We use 
our cost advantage, operational 
efficiency and leading positions in 
primary airports to deliver low fares, 
seamlessly connecting Europe with 
the warmest welcome in the sky.

easyJet is one of the 
largest airlines in the world, 
with 308 aircraft and 20 million 
customers across 34 countries 
and 153 airports. 

easyJet holidays was launched 
in 2019 in order to offer holiday 
packages which encourage the 
84% of customers travelling 
on leisure to spend more 
with us, rather than book 
accommodation elsewhere.

How we do it
•  Our leading position at slot-

constrained airports with high 
customer demand allows us 
to deliver profitable growth 
and resilient returns over the 
long term

•  Our cost efficiency is achieved 
through long term strategic 
partnerships with key airports 
and ground handling operators
•  easyJet has a focus on providing 

services which our customers value
•  The easyJet holidays offering has 
been tailored to the needs of the 
‘easyJet generation’.

Destinations

1.  As at 30 September 2021

www.easyJet.com

13

STRATEGIC REPORT IN TE RVIEW WI TH OUR  CHAIRMA N,  C EO,  A ND C FO

leading from  
the top

Stephen Hester* 

Chair Designate

Q&A with  
Stephen Hester

What attracted you to the role of 
Chair of easyJet?

SH

I have been an admirer of easyJet 
for many years, both from a business 

perspective and as a customer. The brand 
and customer delivery is exceptionally 
strong, and I was attracted by both the 
strength of the management team and 
the potential there is to deliver value to 
all our stakeholders. 

What have you learnt about the 
business since joining?

SH

I’ve been impressed with the passion, 
energy and commitment from the 

many colleagues I have been able to meet 
so far. Johan and his team have done 
really well navigating the uncertainties 
of the pandemic, and positioning the 
Company well for the future. While it has 
been a turbulent and difficult 18 months, 
the “orange spirit” is remarkable and 
their dedication to serving our customers 
is impressive. 

What are the things you think 
easyJet needs to focus on in 
future?

SH

I see so many opportunities for 
our iconic company in the coming 
years. We have a proven business model, 
unrivalled network and loyal customer 
base – we need to capitalise on these 
competitive advantages. Our rights issue 
will allow us to take advantage of strategic 
investment and growth opportunities. But 
the key task is to create strong shareholder 
value which has inevitably suffered during 
Covid-19 times. My job is to lead the Board 
and support management to successfully 
operate easyJet as a “best in class” 
company in the years ahead.

What are you most excited 
about?

SH

I am convinced we can be 
structural winners in the rapidly 

evolving European airline industry, serving 
customers well and delivering attractive 
shareholder value. I’m excited to get 
started on the post-pandemic 
recovery journey. 

My job is to lead the Board and 
support management to successfully 
operate easyJet as a “best in class” 
company in the years ahead. 
Stephen Hester
Chair Designate

 * Stephen Hester joined the Board on 1 September 2021, and will succeed John Barton as Chair on 1 December 2021

14

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

We are emerging from the financial year with renewed 
strength having transformed the business by optimising 
our network and delivering significant structural cost 
savings while also step-changing ancillary revenue. 
Johan Lundgren
Chief Executive Officer 

Johan Lundgren 

Chief Executive Officer

Kenton Jarvis 

Chief Financial Officer

Q&A with  
Johan Lundgren

How do you see easyJet 
emerging from the 2021  
financial year?

JL

We are emerging from the financial 
year with renewed strength having 

transformed the business by optimising 
our network and delivering significant 
structural cost savings while also step-
changing ancillary revenue. These initiatives 
alongside our strong, investment grade 
balance sheet provide easyJet with a 
platform to fast track our growth and 
deliver strong shareholder returns.

Where do you see easyJet  
when looking forward?

JL

There are still challenges ahead with 
the pandemic still being with us, 

however easyJet has ambitious plans for 
profitable growth. We are expanding our 
leadership positions at key bases such as 
Gatwick and Milan with additional slots 
and aircraft for summer 2022. This is 
underpinned by having more than 120 
aircraft on order with a further 57 purchase 
options and rights confirmed to further 
build on this in the years to come.

What actions are we taking  
for a sustainable future?

JL

We continue to lead the industry 
with our testing of Sustainable 
Aviation Fuel (SAF) flying and conducting 
zero emission turnarounds at Bristol airport. 
We also have joined the Race to Zero 
backed by the UN and we are progressing 
our pathway to Net Zero by 2050.

Q&A with  
Kenton Jarvis

Why was £1.2 billion the right  
size of equity raise?

KJ

I led a detailed review of our capital 
structure when I arrived at easyJet 
in order to assess the Group’s long term 
capital and liquidity needs. Based on this 
review the Board concluded that £1.2 billion 
was the optimal size to raise from both a 
defensive perspective, to provide financial 
resilience from further downside risk, and 
from an offensive perspective, positioning 
the Group to take advantage of long term 
strategic opportunities.

Why was now the right time to 
be raising equity?

KJ

I am confident that the rights issue 
was the best course of action and 

formed part of a prudent and proactive 
capital structure management policy to 
optimise our balance sheet, accelerate the 
Group’s recovery from the pandemic and 
enhance our long term strategic position.

What is easyJet’s cost base 
coming out of the pandemic?

KJ

Our actions taken to navigate 
the pandemic have resulted in 

increased debt levels which will in turn 
drive additional ownership costs going 
forward from increased borrowings, as 
well as depreciation and interest charges 
from the sale and leaseback transactions. 
Industry wide, we are seeing airport and 
navigation charges rising as we see third 
parties recover their losses from the 
pandemic. However, we have taken 
action to make structural cost savings 
to help partially offset these, through 
implementing seasonal contracts for our 
crew and insourcing maintenance at a 
number of our bases. 

www.easyJet.com

15

STRATEGIC REPORT MA R KET REVI EW

Our market drivers

Demand
The airline industry is a cyclical  
one, with demand for flights  
driven by economic growth. 
Demand is also seasonal, 
particularly in leisure travel.

During the pandemic, demand has 
primarily been driven by the imposition  
of travel restrictions and the  
uncertainty related to those restrictions.

As we move from the pandemic-
impacted environment into a more 
normal travel environment we 
anticipate a short term rapid 
recovery driven by a combination 
of pent up demand before 
reverting to a longer term trajectory 
driven by economic growth.

Accumulated savings, before reverting 
to a longer term trajectory which will be 
driven by economic growth. Business 
demand will be slower to recover, and 
while there will be structural changes, 
we expect the majority of business 
purpose traffic to return over time.

The aviation industry has also been 
subject to other geopolitical events 
in recent years, as well as terror 
attacks and extreme weather events. 
These have both short term and 
long term consequences for demand 
and the structure of the industry. 

Low-cost carriers such as easyJet 
continue to take market share from 
full-fare legacy carriers.

Fuel
Fuel is one of the biggest costs 
which airlines face and one of the 
most volatile. Fuel represented 24% 
of easyJet’s headline cost base for 
the pre-Covid-19 2019 financial year. 
The ICE Brent crude oil spot price 
has risen from pre-Covid-19 2019 
financial year price of $66 to $79 per 
barrel at the end of the 2021 financial 
year. The price of jet fuel is strongly 
correlated with the price of crude oil.

Real GDP growth
(Annual % change)

Global air traffic
Transport Passengers, globally, 1975-2020
Billions

Brent price 

6
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7

5.0

4.5

4.0

3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

15 16

17

18

19

20

21 22 23 24 25 26

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

Europe
Euro area

European Union

•  Most European carriers have 

•  Short-haul travel is recovering 

cut capacity by between 30% 
and 60% versus 2019 levels.
•  Cash burn during the Covid-19 
pandemic has led to high debt 
levels across the industry and 
state aid in many cases.

faster than long haul post Covid-19.

•  Leisure travel is rebounding more 

quickly than business travel.

120

100

80

60

40

20

0
2016

$ per barrel

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

•  Many European airlines hedge their 
fuel costs. The sudden reduction in 
flying during the Covid-19 lockdowns 
meant that many airlines had 
hedged more fuel than was 
subsequently needed.

•  Many airlines have incurred one-off 
costs to cover these ineffective and 
discontinued hedges.

•  The scale and flexibility of 
our network enabled us to 
be efficient with our network 
choices, to move capacity in 
response to local demand and 
to take advantage of changes 
in the competitive landscape 
during the recovery phase.

•  easyJet has remained extremely 

•  easyJet has continued its fuel 

disciplined in focusing on profitable 
flying through the Covid-19 
pandemic.

•  Scheduling has been adapted 

dynamically, in order to capitalise 
on all available demand.

hedging programme throughout 
the year at reduced levels due to 
the uncertainty in exposures.

r
e
v
i
r
d
t
e
k
r
a
m
y
e
K

n
o
t
c
a
p
m

I

y
r
t
s
u
d
n

i

r
u
o

i

g
n
d
n
o
p
s
e
r
e
r
a
e
w
w
o
H

16

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The key factors which influence easyJet and all operators within 
the European airline industry.

Environmental and social
Sustainability, in particular the 
carbon emissions from flights and 
the contribution to climate change, 
is a significant issue for the aviation 
industry.

According to research by Kantar 
Public across six European countries 
in September 2021, 78% of European 
consumers consider climate change 
a very serious problem. 

On-Time Performance and 
airspace management
European airspace remains a 
challenging environment, with a lack 
of air traffic resources, capacity 
constraints and cost cutting 
measures across the network.

As Europe shows signs of recovery, 
airline schedule instability, unexpected 
demand increase and system 
upgrades will present additional 
challenges moving forward.

To mitigate the capacity constraints 
as we return to pre-Covid-19 levels, 
Eurocontrol continues to re-design 
the airspace infrastructure with the 
intent to create a more efficient and 
sustainable network.

Foreign exchange
easyJet is exposed to foreign 
exchange rate movements, mainly 
resulting from Euro revenues and 
US dollar costs, translated into the 
Sterling functional currency.

Sterling has strengthened during 
the year against both the Euro and 
US dollar as risk sentiment recovered 
from the earlier months of the 
pandemic and the market anticipated 
UK rate hikes in the 2022 financial 
year. This has a favourable impact on 
US denominated costs for the airline 
(predominantly fuel, leases and 
maintenance) and an adverse impact 
on Euro revenues when translated 
into Sterling. 

Delay minutes

GBP/USD and GBP/EURO
exchange rates over 5 years

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2,128,054
2,128,054

5,013,501
5,013,501

24,482,724
24,482,724

24,484,343
24,484,343

15,857,711
15,857,711

1.60

1.45

1.30

1.15

1.00

US dollar to Sterling rate

Euro to Sterling rate

•  Individual airlines, airports and 
industry groups have set net 
zero targets for 2050.

•  Aerospace companies are developing 
new technologies which could in the 
future help to decarbonise aviation.

•  Governments across Europe are 
considering the policy measures 
that will be needed to meet their 
own net zero targets. 

•  In November 2021 we joined the 
Race to Zero and committed to 
setting an interim science-based 
target for 2035 and a net zero 
pathway to 2050.

•  easyJet was the first major airline 
worldwide to offset the carbon 
emissions from the fuel used for all 
our flights, and we currently remain 
the only major airline in Europe to 
do so.

•  Our full Sustainability Strategy and 
further detail is available in the 
Sustainability chapter on page 38.

•  Air traffic control delays cause a 
number of issues from additional 
flying time and airport congestion 
to inefficient flight planning.

•  This leads to increased fuel burn, 
increased cost and delays for our 
customers.

•  easyJet has taken a number of 
steps to mitigate the impact of 
ATC (Air Traffic Control) delay  
by using data and maintaining  
a collaborative relationship  
with Eurocontrol.

•  Disruption costs over the year 

have been low, but our historical 
Operational Resilience programme, 
and tools such as our Self-Service 
Disruption Management (SSDM) 
tool, have set us up well as the 
industry returns to full capacity.

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

•  See page 68 for details of the 

impact.

•  easyJet has continued its US dollar 
hedging programme throughout 
the year at reduced levels due to 
the uncertainty in exposures. 
Foreign currency revenues have 
been netted against costs to 
manage risk. No additional revenue 
hedging was executed in the year. 

www.easyJet.com

17

STRATEGIC REPORT OUR   STRATEGY

Our Strategy

easyJet has prioritised six strategic initiatives that will continue 
to build on our structural advantages in the European aviation 
market and enable us to lead the recovery as travel returns.

Network strategy

Customer excellence

Product portfolio evolution

easyJet holidays

Cost focus

Sustainability

p.19

p.20

p.21

p.21

p.22

p.23

18

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Network strategy

to Covid-19. This represents the first time 
that easyJet has ever had four seasons 
available for sale at the same time and it 
significantly reduced customers’ propensity 
to request refunds. 

Our focused network strategy can be 
summarised as follows: 

1. Lead in our core markets
easyJet prioritises slot-constrained airports 
as these are where customers want to fly 
to and from. In our core markets, we are 
able to achieve cost leadership and 
preserve scale. We provide a balanced 
network portfolio across domestic, city 
and leisure destinations. Our scale enables 
us to provide market leading networks and 
schedules. We are maintaining our focus on 
country leadership in the UK, France and 
Switzerland and our city focus in the 
Netherlands, Italy and Germany. 

2. Accelerate investment in 
Destination Leaders
We will build on our existing leading 
position in Western Europe’s top leisure 
destinations to provide network breadth 
and flexibility. This will also unlock cost 
benefits, enabling us to manage seasonality 
and support the growth of easyJet holidays. 
It also ensures that easyJet remains top of 
mind for customers and is seen as the ‘local 
airline’ for governments and hoteliers. 

3. Build our network in Focus 
Cities
easyJet is building a network of key cities, 
broadening our presence across Europe. 
This is a low-risk way of serving large 
origin markets. We will base assets in 
Focus Cities where it makes sense 
from a cost perspective. 

The scale and flexibility of 
our network will continue to 
provide us with opportunities

Network positions
easyJet has a strong network of leading 
number one and number two positions in 
primary airports, which have proven to be 
amongst the highest yielding in the market. 
This enables us to be efficient with our 
network choices, with an emphasis on 
maximising returns. We have decisively 
reallocated 43 aircraft to higher returning 
bases highlighting the strength of our 
network These capital reallocations 
focused on markets where easyJet is 
strong, driving confidence in delivering 
higher returns.

We will seek to strengthen these positions 
as the competitive landscape evolves, as 
demonstrated at London Gatwick where 
we are increasing our market share after 
reallocating aircraft to this high yielding 
base along with the addition of new slots. 

The scale and flexibility of our network will 
continue to provide us with opportunities 
to take advantage as the competitive 
landscape develops during the recovery 
phase. easyJet’s network is unrivalled and 
difficult to replicate. We have a golden 
opportunity to continue to take market 
share from our main competitors, who fly 
120 million seats in our markets and are 
facing challenges. As a result of these 
challenges they are focusing on long-haul 
whilst restructuring and retrenching their 
short-haul operations.

To better capture summer leisure 
demand, easyJet opened seasonal bases 
in Malaga and Faro on 1 June 2021, adding 
to Palma which was already an existing 
seasonal base. All three seasonal bases 
are expanding with additional aircraft for 
summer 22 being added. Our destination-
based fleet, also including Barcelona, is 
now increasing from 9 in the 2019 financial 
year to 21 in the 2022 financial year. These 
bases operate leisure routes with aircraft 
at the destination airport instead of at 
the source market. This allows easyJet to 
manage seasonal demand profiles while 
reducing our fixed cost base over winter. 
This approach provides the flexibility to 
shift capacity across multiple source 
markets at short notice without impacting 
our people.

Our schedule for the summer 22 season 
went on sale far earlier than it would have 
done under normal circumstances. This 
enabled our customers to easily transfer 
any bookings which were cancelled due 

www.easyJet.com

19

STRATEGIC REPORT OUR   STRATEGY ( CONTINUED )

Customer excellence

We want to win our customers’ 
loyalty, and therefore it is 
important we engage with and 
understand our customers to 
make sure our product and 
service remain competitive 

Customer Excellence
easyJet aims to deliver a seamless and 
digitally enabled customer journey at 
every stage:

•  Prior to travel – our ‘direct is best’ 

strategy is led by our digital channels, 
with an app/mobile-first mindset. 
Initiatives include optimising our web 
booking interface; driving app usage 
and improving the overall experience; 
enhancing self-service booking 
management such as changing 
passenger details or baggage 
booking; improving online redemption 
management such as vouchers; 
developing full pre-order capability for 
retail onboard; and payments innovation. 
To help our customers navigate through 
Covid-19 travel rules, we launched the 
Covid-19 Travel Hub in nine languages, 
providing a one stop shop for all 
information customers require to prepare 
for travel, including easy access to 
Covid-19 tests at negotiated rates.
•  In airport – moving customers from 
kerb to aircraft without the need 
for human interaction. This involves 
improving boarding in order to improve 
CSAT and reduce queuing, which our 
new cabin bag policy is helping with. 
Streamlining the bag drop and boarding 
experience, building a model customer 
journey at Gatwick to roll out to other 
airports, and pushing for virtual solutions 
is enhancing the customer experience 
across our airports. 

•  In flight – our warm welcome and 
personal service to get you to your 
destination on time. We are committed 
to improving On-Time Performance 
(OTP) – on time, every time. 
This is done by managing suppliers, 
empowering crew, implementing 
pre-tactical and strategic ATC planning, 
carrying out base operating reviews, 
building a customer-level data view to 
enable targeted offers such as inflight 
retail and reviewing the CRM lifecycle for 
more relevant customer engagement. 

•  Support – we aim to give customers 

the digital tools to easily self-serve when 
things do not go to plan, or to engage 
after their flight. As part of this initiative 
we have delivered an enhanced 
Self-Service Disruption Management 
(SSDM) tool to let customers quickly  
self-serve in disruption and we 
introduced chatbot capability allowing 
customers to receive concise information 
on biosecurity measures, refunds, 
vouchers and travel restrictions without 

20 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

having to speak to a customer service 
agent. We launched a new social media 
strategy, offering more channels for 
our customers to contact us, while 
increasing their engagement with 
us through more relevant and 
inspiring content. 

Actions delivered as part of our customer 
excellence initiative include:

•  Protection Promise: giving customers the 
flexibility they needed to be confident to 
book during the uncertainty of ever-
changing travel restrictions, this includes 
fee-free transfer of flights up to two 
hours before departure.

•  All easyJet flight vouchers can be 

redeemed online, quickly and easily 
when making a booking.

•  Processing time of refunds has been 

further decreased to ensure customers 
are getting their money back as quickly 
as possible.

•  The launch of our chatbots, giving 
customers the opportunity to get 
answers to their queries quickly 
and easily without having to pick 
up the phone.

This focus on customer excellence has 
continued to drive the strength of our 
brand and delivered strong customer 
satisfaction scores. easyJet remains first 
choice low cost carrier (LCC) in the UK, 
France, Switzerland and Berlin, best value 
airline in the UK and France ahead of other 
LCCs and legacy carriers and best value 
LCC in Italy, Switzerland and Berlin. 

75%

Our customer satisfaction score 
for the year is higher than in the 
2019 pre-pandemic financial year

In the 2021 financial year, On-Time Performance increased by 3 percentage points to 87%. 
This reflects the strides we are taking towards leaving ‘on time, every time’. This is crucially 
important for our operational efficiency, as well as customer satisfaction. 

OTP % arrivals within 15 minutes7
2021 Network
2020 Network

Q1

94%
80%

Q2

91%
82%

Q3

91%
83%

Q4

84%
94%

FY

87%
84%

Product portfolio evolution

Product Portfolio Evolution
easyJet recognises that the continued 
evolution of our product portfolio 
represents a significant opportunity to 
increase revenue per seat and margins 
in the coming years. During the 2021 
financial year we have launched a 
number of products, including: 

•  Standard Plus: includes Up front seat 
selection, access to easyJet Plus Bag 
Drop, Speedy Boarding, one cabin bag 
and an additional under seat cabin bag in 
one easy fare. 

•  Cabin Bags: purchased alongside a 
premium or standard seat allowing 
a large bag to be taken onboard 
the aircraft. 

•  Leisure fare (Essentials): includes a 
standard seat and 23kg hold bag. 

The Directors believe that the continued 
evolution of the Group’s product portfolio 
provides the opportunity to build on 
spend per customer, delivering enhanced 
sustainable returns. The initial performance 
from these products has been very 
encouraging with a significant spend 
per customer being observed. 

Further opportunities within easyJet’s 
product offering have been highlighted 
and will be delivered over the coming 
year. Inflight retail, our new retail brand 
and proposition is due to be launched in 
H2 of the 2022 financial year. This will 
involve direct sourcing and contracting 
for our on-board retail offering. We have 
partnered with dnata and aim to improve 
our customer proposition, offering a pre 
and during inflight shopping experience. 

easyJet holidays

We enjoy strong partnerships with leading 
hotels without the need for financial 
commitments or inventory risk. 63% of 
bookings are with directly contracted 
hotels and during the 2021 financial year, 
the Group signed over 40 additional 
flagship beach hotels which were previously 
under exclusive contracts with competitors. 
This further optimises the easyJet holidays’ 
portfolio, whilst also establishing 
connectivity with some of the world’s 
largest hotel chains including Hilton, Accor, 
Radisson and Intercontinental Hotel Group 
to improve the range of our cities offering. 

Reflecting the strength of the easyJet 
holidays business model and the significant 
opportunities to grow market share, the 
Group sees a clear roadmap to easyJet 
holidays contributing annual profit before 
tax in excess of £100 million. Our holidays 
business has a highly scalable business 
model based on low fixed costs (96% 
variable1) with strong margins and a 
digital platform which will provide a 
base for growth. 

easyJet holidays
The Group is continuing to build on the 
success of the launch of easyJet holidays, 
Europe’s fastest growing holiday company, 
which offers flexible holiday packages at 
the best prices. Customers are drawn to 
our trusted brand with over 40% of 
easyJet holidays sales coming from flight 
customers choosing to upgrade to a 
holiday after visiting easyjet.com. With 
300 million visits a year to our app and 
website, this provides a significant 
opportunity going forward. We offer 
unbeatable prices with our holidays 
being the cheapest like for like on the 
market. This coupled with our direct 
hotel contracting and low fixed cost 
base provides easyJet with a strong 
business model to grow and deliver 
sustainable returns. 

easyJet holidays bookings are underpinned 
by an industry leading ‘Protection Promise’ 
which has meant that the Group has been 
able to retain over 60% of customers 
whose holidays were affected by the 
Covid-19 pandemic in the 2021 financial 
year. easyJet holidays also offsets the 
carbon emissions directly associated with 
its holidays—the fuel used from flights and 
transfers, plus the energy from hotel stays. 

1.  Based on normalised volumes

www.easyJet.com

21

STRATEGIC REPORT £512 
million

cost savings delivered the 2021 
financial year, of which almost 
half are sustainable 

•  easyJet outsources the majority of heavy 
maintenance where it is cost effective. 
We have extended our contract with 
Lufthansa Technik to 2025 and with 
SRT Malta to 2023, delivering cost 
savings and simpler work packages. 
We have also extended our low-cost 
engine shop visit contract out to 2023 
and concluded a cost-effective deal on 
Leap engines and ongoing support. Our 
components deal has been extended to 
2027 with additional cost savings and a 
Milan parts hub. We have worked closely 
with Airbus to create more efficient 6- 
and 12-year checks. We have completed 
insourcing of line maintenance in Berlin, 
Glasgow, Edinburgh and Bristol, which 
has delivered cost savings and higher 
quality. All line maintenance at Gatwick 
is now done in-house, with the addition 
of a completed third hangar bay in 
March 2021. 

132 major ground handling 
contracts have been 
renegotiated

OUR   STRATEGY ( CONTINUED )

Cost focus

easyJet has delivered £512 million of cost 
savings in the 2021 financial year, with 
almost half being sustainable. These cost 
savings help mitigate some of our cost 
headwinds. Savings have been delivered 
across every cost line. As part of our 
continued cost challenge we are identifying 
further sustainable savings to strengthen 
our competitive advantage.

As a result of highly constructive 
relationships with our trade union partners 
and our people, we have been able to 
deliver significant cost and productivity 
savings, including:

•  Reducing the number of full-time 

equivalent (FTE) crew per aircraft in 
all bases (excluding Italy at this stage) 
for our summer 2021 flying programme. 
This has enabled significant improvements 
in our crew ratios and productivity in 
preparation for our return to flying

•  Minimised redundancy costs by agreeing 

innovative part-time and seasonal 
contracts with our unions. This improves 
productivity on a sustainable basis and 
allows the capacity to grow if required, 
without needing to hire new people

•  Re-balancing of the number of seasonal 
contracts we have across the network
•  Reductions in base pay in some of our 

higher-cost jurisdictions, with easements 
in rostering rules also being agreed and 
two-year pay freeze agreements in 
most jurisdictions

•  These measures have reduced our 

overall cost of crew whilst addressing 
structural and productivity challenges 
with our old crew model. They have also 
enabled the investment in seasonal 
bases in Faro and Malaga which opened 
during the 2021 financial year alongside 
our existing seasonal base in Palma, 
continuing to improve efficiency at a 
lower cost base. 

•  Airports and ground handling costs 

represent a major part of our cost base 
and have been a particular focus. We 
continue negotiations with airports 
across our network, to secure the best 
long term deals. We have reviewed 
ground handling costs on a line-by-line 
basis and renegotiated 132 major ground 
handling contracts, with permanent 
savings achieved in Ground Operations 
and Customer Management Centres. 
New contracts focus on driving safety 
and OTP while reducing costs. We have 
achieved a 25% reduction in call centre 
costs with new contracts to 2027 and 
improved customer service. 

22

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Sustainability

easyJet has committed to joining the Race 
to Zero while continuing to work on our 
Net Zero pathway to 2050. Sustainability 
is of significant and growing importance to 
our customers as 78% of consumers say 
that they are concerned about the impact 
of climate change. This is something that 
easyJet views with the upmost importance, 
as we aim to pioneer sustainable travel. 

There has been significant progress made 
during 2021, demonstrated by our first ever 
SAF flight at London Gatwick, using a 30% 
blend flight taking off on 19 October 2021. 
A SAF blend was then used on all flights 
operating from Gatwick to Glasgow 
throughout COP26. During the year we 
have also conducted an emission free 
turnaround trial at Bristol airport where 
we saw a 97% reduction in CO2 emissions 
using electric powered ground equipment 
instead of diesel. 

Our Sustainability strategy has three 
pillars: tackling our carbon emissions; 
stimulating carbon innovation; and 
going beyond carbon. 

•  Tackling carbon emissions: We were 

the world’s first major airline to offset the 
carbon emissions from the fuel used on 
all our flights across our entire network, 
and we continue to work tirelessly to 
minimise carbon emissions across our 
operations. We continue to operate a 
fleet of modern, fuel efficient aircraft 
and are always looking for more ways 
to be fuel efficient and emit less carbon. 
Customer awareness of our carbon 
offsetting, based on customers who 
have flown within the past 12 months, 
was 51%, compared to 45% in the 2020 
financial year, and the positive difference 
in overall satisfaction between customers 
who were aware and not aware was 6.3 
percentage points. easyJet holidays was 
also the first major holiday company to 
offset the carbon emissions directly 
associated with its holidays – the fuel 
from flights and transfers plus the 
energy from hotel stays. 

•  Stimulating carbon innovation: We 
are supporting the development of 
new technologies to stimulate the 
decarbonisation of aviation as quickly 
as possible. Offsetting can only be an 
interim solution, while zero emissions 
technology is developed. We are 
collaborating with several industry 
leaders to support technological step 
change: Wright Electric in their 
development of ‘Wright 1’ and a strategic 
partnership with Airbus in their ambition 
to develop a zero emission commercial 
aircraft by 2035. We are excited to see 
the growing momentum behind novel 
propulsion technologies, including 

9 million

individual items of plastic removed 
from inflight retail in the 2021 
financial year

hybrid-electric, hydrogen fuel-cell 
and hydrogen combustion. 
There is significant potential for 
these technologies, particularly on  
short-haul networks such as our own. 

•  Going beyond carbon: We are 

constantly looking for more ways to 
take action outside of carbon reductions 
including reducing the amount of plastic 
used on our services and having crew 
and pilot uniforms made from recycled 
plastic. By the end of the 2021 financial 
year we had already removed over 36 
million individual items of plastic from our 
inflight retail. We are also aiming to 
reduce waste and plastic within our 
supply chain. We are implementing a 
ISO14001-compliant Environmental 
Management System, and can champion 
sustainability. We are particularly pleased 
that easyJet’s long term work with our 
charity partner Unicef, who we have 
supported through on-board collections 
since 2012, is continuing by funding 
COVAX global vaccinations – with 
Unicef’s aim being to deliver 2 billion 
vaccines by the end of 2021. Hundreds 
of easyJet crew members have 
volunteered to help at vaccination 
centres across Europe, with many 
of them having trained to deliver 
the vaccines. 

We were the world’s first 
major airline to offset the 
carbon emissions from the 
fuel used on all our flights 
across our entire network

www.easyJet.com

23

STRATEGIC REPORT KE Y PERFORMA NCE INDICATOR S

Measuring our performance

Headline (loss)/profit 
before tax per seat (£)

Headline (loss)/earnings 
per share (p)

Headline (loss)/return on 
capital employed (%)

(39.87)
(39.87)
(39.87)

(14.68)
(14.68)

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

4.074.07

6.076.07

4.714.71

(166.9)
(166.9)

(149.7)*
(149.7)*

2021

2020

(25.5)
(25.5)
(25.5)

(19.9)
(19.9)

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

88.788.7

118.3
118.3

82.582.5

2019

2018

2017

11.411.4

14.614.6

11.911.9

Per seat metrics are for the Airline 
business only. 

 * 2020 restated due to impact of the 

2021 rights issue.

Why it is important 
Incremental improvements in 
profitability ensure that we have a 
platform for long term growth while 
generating value for all stakeholders.

Why it is important 
Delivering sustainable shareholder 
value is a fundamental part of our 
mindset as we manage our business.

2018 as restated, headline
2017-2018 pre IFRS 16, normalised 
operating profit after tax divided by 
average adjusted capital employed. 
2019-2021 post IFRS 16.

Why it is important 
As a low cost business, we 
focus on efficiency to produce 
customer solutions whilst also driving 
operational efficiencies which will 
maximise our return on investment.

What we measure 
Headline (loss)/profit after tax 
divided by the weighted average 
number of shares in issue during the 
period (adjusted for shares held in 
employee benefits trusts).

How we performed
Headline loss per share was 
166.9 pence (2020: 149.7 pence loss 
per share*), driven by the loss in 
the year. Total loss per share was 
159.0 pence (2020: 222.9 pence loss 
per share*). Both 2020 figures have 
been restated due to the rights 
issue in 2021.

What we measure
Headline operating (loss)/profit  
after tax, divided by average 
capital employed.

How we performed
Headline ROCE worsened to (25.5%) 
(2020: (19.9%)) driven by 
the headline loss recognised in 
the year. Total ROCE improved 
to (22.4%) (2020: (23.0%)), a smaller 
decline impacted by non-headline 
sale and leaseback gains and 
restructuring provision releases.

Our customer satisfaction index is 

based on the results of a customer 

satisfaction survey measuring how 

satisfied the customer was with their 

most recent flight.

How we performed

Overall customer satisfaction was 

75%, no change from the 2020 

performance. Our continued 

focus on customers, the reduced 

congestion of European airspace, 

and our customer positive reaction 

to our Covid-19 safety policies have 

contributed to the performance.

What we measure 
Headline (loss)/profit before 
tax divided by the number of 
seats flown.

How we performed
Headline loss before tax per seat was 
£39.87 (2020: £14.68 loss). Revenue 
per seat decreased primarily due to a full 
year impact of Covid-19, with sustained 
softness in macro-level demand as 
customers’ confidence and ability to 
travel have been impacted by 
fluctuating infection rates across the 
UK and Europe, resulting in local and 
national lockdowns and frequent 
changes in travel restrictions and 
travel advice. This was compounded 
by the increase in cost per seat, as our 
fixed cost base has serviced a much 
reduced schedule.

24 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Revised calculations in 2019, 2017-2018 

restated.

2017, 2018 and 2019 restated to align 

to current industry methodology.

Why it is important 

Why it is important 

Why it is important

Customers have increasing choice 

and their expectations are rising. 

Ensuring we meet their evolving 

needs will position us as the brand of 

choice when flying within Europe. 

Reliable operational performance  

is a key factor in our customers’ 

perceptions of their experience with 

us. Managing OTP and minimising 

disruption will positively impact on 

the likelihood of our customers 

choosing to fly with us on a 

repeat basis.

An important part of Our Promise 

to be a safe and responsible 

airline is to help tackle climate 

change. In the short term our 

focus is being as efficient as we 

can, and to drive carbon 

efficiencies.

What we measure

What we measure

What we measure

Percentage of flights which arrive 

within 15 minutes of the scheduled 

arrival time.

How much carbon dioxide is 

produced for each passenger, for 

each kilometre they fly with us.

How we performed

Our OTP has increased year 

on year to 87% (2020: 84%). 

This has been driven by a full 

year reduction in congestion of 

European airspace, as well as our 

strong operational performance. 

How we performed

In 2021 our carbon emissions per 

passenger kilometre were 81.08g, 

up from 70.77g in 2020. Reduced 

load factors have driven the 

increase in emissions per 

passenger, which was  

mitigated by our efforts to  

be more operationally efficient, 

including increased use of the 

more efficient neo aircraft and  

a focus on flight efficiency 

initiatives.

easyJet has six Key Performance Indicators which we use  
to measure progress. 

Customer satisfaction (%)

On-Time Performance (%)

CO2 emissions per 
passenger kilometre

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

757575

7575

7474

7575

7373

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

8787

8484

7575

7575

7676

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

81.08
81.08

70.77
70.77

70.41
70.41

71.5671.56

72.46
72.46

Per seat metrics are for the Airline 

 * 2020 restated due to impact of the 

2018 as restated, headline

business only. 

2021 rights issue.

Revised calculations in 2019, 2017-2018 
restated.

2017, 2018 and 2019 restated to align 
to current industry methodology.

Why it is important 
Customers have increasing choice 
and their expectations are rising. 
Ensuring we meet their evolving 
needs will position us as the brand of 
choice when flying within Europe. 

What we measure
Our customer satisfaction index is 
based on the results of a customer 
satisfaction survey measuring how 
satisfied the customer was with their 
most recent flight.

How we performed
Overall customer satisfaction was 
75%, no change from the 2020 
performance. Our continued 
focus on customers, the reduced 
congestion of European airspace, 
and our customer positive reaction 
to our Covid-19 safety policies have 
contributed to the performance.

Why it is important 
Reliable operational performance  
is a key factor in our customers’ 
perceptions of their experience with 
us. Managing OTP and minimising 
disruption will positively impact on 
the likelihood of our customers 
choosing to fly with us on a 
repeat basis.

Why it is important
An important part of Our Promise 
to be a safe and responsible 
airline is to help tackle climate 
change. In the short term our 
focus is being as efficient as we 
can, and to drive carbon 
efficiencies.

What we measure
Percentage of flights which arrive 
within 15 minutes of the scheduled 
arrival time.

What we measure
How much carbon dioxide is 
produced for each passenger, for 
each kilometre they fly with us.

How we performed
Our OTP has increased year 
on year to 87% (2020: 84%). 
This has been driven by a full 
year reduction in congestion of 
European airspace, as well as our 
strong operational performance. 

How we performed
In 2021 our carbon emissions per 
passenger kilometre were 81.08g, 
up from 70.77g in 2020. Reduced 
load factors have driven the 
increase in emissions per 
passenger, which was  
mitigated by our efforts to  
be more operationally efficient, 
including increased use of the 
more efficient neo aircraft and  
a focus on flight efficiency 
initiatives.

In addition to the KPIs reported above, easyJet is introducing an additional KPI this year. 

Headline EBITDAR margin for 2021: (37.8%). This metric forms part of our future 
targets and will be reported on an ongoing basis from this financial year.

www.easyJet.com

25

Why it is important 

Why it is important 

Incremental improvements in 

profitability ensure that we have a 

platform for long term growth while 

generating value for all stakeholders.

Delivering sustainable shareholder 

value is a fundamental part of our 

mindset as we manage our business.

customer solutions whilst also driving 

2017-2018 pre IFRS 16, normalised 

operating profit after tax divided by 

average adjusted capital employed. 

2019-2021 post IFRS 16.

Why it is important 

As a low cost business, we 

focus on efficiency to produce 

operational efficiencies which will 

maximise our return on investment.

What we measure 

Headline (loss)/profit before 

tax divided by the number of 

seats flown.

What we measure 

Headline (loss)/profit after tax 

divided by the weighted average 

What we measure

Headline operating (loss)/profit  

after tax, divided by average 

number of shares in issue during the 

capital employed.

period (adjusted for shares held in 

employee benefits trusts).

How we performed

How we performed

How we performed

Headline loss before tax per seat was 

Headline loss per share was 

Headline ROCE worsened to (25.5%) 

£39.87 (2020: £14.68 loss). Revenue 

166.9 pence (2020: 149.7 pence loss 

(2020: (19.9%)) driven by 

per seat decreased primarily due to a full 

per share*), driven by the loss in 

year impact of Covid-19, with sustained 

the year. Total loss per share was 

the headline loss recognised in 

the year. Total ROCE improved 

softness in macro-level demand as 

159.0 pence (2020: 222.9 pence loss 

to (22.4%) (2020: (23.0%)), a smaller 

customers’ confidence and ability to 

per share*). Both 2020 figures have 

decline impacted by non-headline 

been restated due to the rights 

issue in 2021.

sale and leaseback gains and 

restructuring provision releases.

travel have been impacted by 

fluctuating infection rates across the 

UK and Europe, resulting in local and 

national lockdowns and frequent 

changes in travel restrictions and 

travel advice. This was compounded 

by the increase in cost per seat, as our 

fixed cost base has serviced a much 

reduced schedule.

STRATEGIC REPORT STA K EHOLDER  ENGAG EMENT

Our engagement with 
stakeholders

Our stakeholders are a fundamental part of our 
operations and are referenced throughout this 
report. We have set out on the following pages 
details of who our key stakeholders are, how we have 
engaged with them and the associated outcomes. 

This section also describes how the Board acted in a way 
it considers would most likely promote the success of the 
Company for the benefit of its members as a whole, 
taking into account the factors set out in section 172 of 
the Companies Act 2006 (the ‘Section 172 statement’). 
Further details of the Board’s activities during the year can 
be found in the Governance section on pages 111 to 117. 

Despite the continued and ever changing travel restrictions 
in place, we were able to fly 20.4 million passengers in 2021. 
This includes individuals who booked flight-only trips with 
us for leisure or business, as well as those who booked 
easyJet holidays.

01. OUR CUSTOMERS 

26 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Key focus
•  Safety 
•  Sustainability 
•  Choice (time of flying, 

destinations, ancillary offerings)

•  Ease of booking
•  Cost and affordability
•  Minimising disruption 
•  Ease of making changes

Why we engage
A key part of Our Strategy is a focus on customer 
excellence, both to win our customers’ loyalty but 
also to achieve our purpose of making travel easy, 
enjoyable and affordable, whether it is for leisure or 
business. Our understanding of who our current and 
future customers are, what products they need and 
how they perceive easyJet enables us to prioritise our 
efforts in driving a positive customer experience and 
therefore loyalty, especially given the current 
uncertainty in the travel environment. 

How we engage
•  We regularly survey our customers to find out about 
their experiences post travel. We also survey our 
customers prior to launching a new product offering. 
We monitor sentiment via social media tracking 
versus competitors, and brand strength across 
Europe via the Brand Tracker.

•  Our crew interact with customers on a daily basis, 
and this is regularly fed back to management 
through crew feedback sessions and online forums.

•  We interact with customers via our customer call 

centres based in the UK and overseas, and on social 
media. This includes when customers need extra 
support or help with special assistance requests or 
arrangements when travel is disrupted. 

•  We measure our performance in part through our 
customer satisfaction KPI, set out on page 25.

Considerations and outcomes
It is clear that the pandemic has brought with it 
increased complexity and uncertainty, both from the 
continually changing travel restrictions imposed by 
governments across Europe and the need for us to 
dynamically manage the schedule, which has resulted 
in disrupted travel plans. With the customer at the 
heart of everything we do, we introduced a number 
of initiatives primarily around making travel easy and 
accessible for all and addressing this new, complex 
and uncertain travel environment. As a result of 
these initiatives customer satisfaction has been 75%.

•  The launch of the Covid-19 Travel Hub on  

easyjet.com, making it as easy as possible for 
customers to stay informed of the latest travel 
guidelines to and from the 34 countries on 
easyJet’s European network. This has been 
continually updated and helps customers navigate 
the various requirements and enables them to 
plan their trips with confidence.

•  Enhancing the industry leading ‘Protection Promise’, 
allowing customers more flexibility to book with 
confidence with the ability to change their flights up 
to two hours before departure, without a change 
fee, and transfer to any flights currently on sale. 
The schedule was also put on sale earlier than ever 
before to provide as much choice to customers as 
possible. The easyJet holidays ‘Protection Promise’ 
was also enhanced to reflect the complexity of the 
UK traffic light system in place for much of the year.

•  Launching a travel insurance policy which included 

Covid-19 cover as standard, covering customers both 
ahead of and during their trips, including if they are 
unable to return home due to testing positive for 
Covid-19 while away.

•  Extensive lobbying for the price of testing to reduce, 
so that travel would be more affordable and that 
the price of testing would not be a barrier for 
people being reunited with family and friends 
across Europe. We also negotiated a competitively 
priced PCR test for our customers through our 
partnership with Randox.

•  Giving customers the digital tools to easily self-serve 
when things do not go to plan, or to engage with 
us after their trips. This has included delivering an 
enhanced Self-Service Disruption Management 
(SSDM) tool, to let customers quickly self-serve if 
their travel plans are disrupted, and the ability to 
redeem vouchers online.

•  Increasing the choice across the network in line 
with demand, with a significant number of new 
UK domestic routes, as well as new routes across 
leisure destinations in our European network. 
•  Introduction of a new cabin bag policy, giving 

customers the ability to select the most appropriate 
ticket for their baggage needs and providing 
certainty if they want to bring bags on board 
subject to availability. This has also helped 
improve the boarding process and punctuality. 

The safety and wellbeing of our customers is key, 
and the Safety Committee continuously monitored 
easyJet’s biosecurity standards to ensure we provide 
a safe and healthy environment for our customers. 
Our biosecurity standards are continuously adjusted as 
restrictions change. Policies have also been developed 
and tested by the Customer Safety Governance Group 
to understand how to continually improve customer 
safety and wellbeing.

Customer sentiment and feedback is regularly reported 
to and discussed by the Airline Management Board 
and the plc Board. The Board has also reflected on the 
above initiatives and the impact of the pandemic on 
customer behaviour when reviewing the Group’s 
longer-term strategy during the year. Consequently, 
it is placing an increased focus on accelerating the 
digitisation of the customer journey as there is more 
work to do, with an investment in commercial systems 
and the inflight retail offering amongst others. 

www.easyJet.com

27

STRATEGIC REPORT STA K EHOLDER  ENGAG EMENT  (CONT INUED)

Keeping employees connected to our business and 
ensuring they feel supported during this period has 
also been a key focus. As a result of our engagement 
with them during the year, there have been a number 
of initiatives put in place. 

•  Clear communication has never been more 

important. To ensure that employees are provided 
with information on matters of concern to them, 
and that there is an awareness of the financial 
and economic factors affecting the Company’s 
performance, Johan Lundgren has continued to 
update employees frequently about the ever 
changing external environment and what 
management and the Board are doing to support 
and involve them. This included the launch of a new 
communications format; a weekly podcast designed 
to talk about the most important issues and provide 
an update on key Company-wide highlights.

•  A wide range of support for employees’ physical 

and mental wellbeing has been made available for 
employees, whether they are crew or office based. 
Under the umbrella of ‘You Matter’, this support 
and guidance has complemented the existing 
Employee Assistance Programme. Our summer 
‘Be You. Be Kind’ campaign was successful in 
promoting our ongoing commitment to create 
an inclusive environment. 

•  The enduring impact of the pandemic has required 
adapted ways of working across the business and 
our hybrid approach has helped employees deal 
with the change both personally and professionally. 
We ran training initiatives for all our managers to 
support their teams when remote working and 
then to manage the transition to hybrid working. 
The health and safety of our employees is a 
priority, which has led to us adapting the workplace 
and putting in place a number of biosecurity 
measures to enable a safe phased return to 
the working environment.

•  As well as a focus on employee wellbeing in the face 
of the pandemic, we also continued to drive action 
on our diversity and inclusion focus to create an 
environment where all employees feel they can be 
themselves and belong. We continued to improve 
the support available to our LGBTQ+ community. 
This included the launch of a ‘Being trans and 
transitioning’ at easyJet guide, to help everyone to 
feel that their differences are respected and valued, 
and that everyone has the opportunity to be the 
true version of themselves.

•  The Board discussed the impact of the pandemic on 
employees regularly. This included a discussion as 
part of the new Employee Representative Director 
mechanism, where the Board received an update on 
feedback from two employee representative bodies. 
It was acknowledged that different parts of the 
business had been impacted differently, and that 
there was a need to bring everyone together and 
re-energise the entire workforce, which would be 
developed by the People team. 

Key focus
•  Health, safety and working 

conditions 

•  Wellbeing and mental health
•  Training and career development
•  Diversity and inclusion

Why we engage
Our people are a critical part of our business and 
their famous ‘orange spirit’ a key part of our success. 
We want to attract, retain and develop our people 
by creating an inclusive and energising environment, 
inspiring everyone to learn and grow and do their best 
– and helping our ‘orange spirit’ to thrive. Engaging 
effectively with them is key to doing this successfully.

How we engage
•  We have a number of employee representative 
groups across Europe. We also engage with 21 
trade unions in seven countries, across 18 Collective 
Bargaining Groups, and have continued to engage 
with them extensively during the year.

•  In addition to undertaking employee surveys and 

providing internal social platforms, we have country 
and base teams which manage and interact with 
staff on a daily basis.

•  The Board took the opportunity to review its own 
mechanism for engaging with employees during 
the year, as set out in the Governance section. 
The Employee Representative Directors meet 
individually with the Company’s main representative 
bodies regularly and with other Works Councils on 
a regular basis. 

Considerations and outcomes
The high calibre of our people is a key source of 
differentiation for easyJet compared to our 
competitors, driving CSAT and customer loyalty. 
Our strong employer reputation attracts and 
retains engaged crew, with the spirit to deliver 
excellent service. 

Our people have however continued to be significantly 
impacted during the year, whether that be as a result 
of being furloughed, working from home, or the 
restructuring programme. The pandemic has brought 
with it challenges around attrition and retention for 
some specific head office business functions that 
are industry agnostic, such as legal, finance and IT. 
As a result of the uncertainty in the aviation industry, 
a highly competitive external recruitment market, 
and no bonuses being payable, retention issues 
have needed to be addressed. As a result, we have 
developed a comprehensive strategy focusing on 
wellbeing, talent management, reward, recognition, 
skills development and the employee experience. 
Our Glassdoor rating of employee satisfaction is 4.2 
(out of 5.0), which is the highest within the travel and 
hospitality sector, illustrating our market-leading 
position in the labour market. 

28 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

At easyJet, we have a 
workforce of over 13,000 
employees across nine 
countries in Europe, 
including 4,000 pilots 
and 7,000 cabin crew.

02. OUR PEOPLE

www.easyJet.com

29

STRATEGIC REPORT STA K EHOLDER  ENGAG EMENT  (CONT INUED)

easyJet partners with key suppliers to deliver 
many of its operational and commercial 
activities. Our partners are carefully selected, 
and significant emphasis is placed on 
managing these relationships, with the aim 
of encouraging incremental innovation 
and performance. 

03. OUR Suppliers

30 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Considerations and outcomes
•  Providing certainty both to our suppliers 

and in relation to our own cost base led to 
a comprehensive review of the supplier 
arrangements across operations, including 
engineering, maintenance and ground handling, 
and customer services. The review was focused on 
achieving efficiencies and value for money for both 
sides, while providing an element of certainty to 
allow suppliers to invest in the services they provide 
easyJet. As a result, the Board approved the 
extension and updating of contracts with DHL, 
Menzies and Groupe Europe in relation to ground 
handling at airports across Europe, and with two 
suppliers in relation to Customer Management 
Centre provision, amongst others.

•  Management also negotiated further deferrals of 
aircraft purchases with Airbus during the year in 
order to provide a significant reduction in capital 
expenditure and align aircraft delivery profile with 
strategy and cash flow planning, which were 
approved by the Board. 

•  easyJet holidays launched its inaugural Sustainability 
Strategy, making a commitment for all its holidays to 
directly support sustainable practices by the end of 
2025. This will involve its supply chain by committing 
to encouraging 100% of its contracted hotels to 
achieve certification by a Global Sustainable Tourism 
Council (GSTC) accredited certification body or a 
certification to a GSTC recognised standard by the 
end of 2025. It is only by working collaboratively with 
industry and destination partners in this way that this 
is possible, building knowledge and sharing best 
practice to accelerate industry action on critical 
environmental, economic and social issues.

•  As we started to ramp up our flying schedule during 
the year, we assessed the readiness of our suppliers 
across relevant business functions to ensure they 
were able to deliver our operations safely and we 
continue to engage with key suppliers as the 
recovery ramps up. For example the Board 
discussed the post pandemic plans directly with 
Gatwick Airport management during its base visit.

Key focus
•  Compliance with regulations
•  Safety
•  Consumer protection
•  Health and safety
•  Treatment of suppliers
•  Sustainability

Our current fleet of 308 aircraft is supplied by 
Airbus, with all engines supplied by CFM. The fleet 
is maintained by maintenance, repair and 
overhaul specialists.

Ground-handling agents manage the logistics 
operations at airports, such as baggage handling 
and aircraft loading and unloading. We have a 
strategic partnership with DHL to provide these 
services at Gatwick, Bristol and Manchester, and 
Menzies in Spain, whilst Swissport manage the 
operation in Switzerland and Berlin.

We have a number of other key suppliers, including 
critical technology suppliers, fuel providers, engineering 
and maintenance providers, aircraft lessors, and 
hoteliers for easyJet holidays.

Why we engage
We want to be number one or two in primary airports, 
and provide ease, value and affordability to our 
customers. This means having an open, constructive 
and effective relationship with all suppliers, as we 
believe they are integral to the Group’s success.

How we engage
•  The Executive Directors engage with senior 

executives of our major suppliers on a regular basis 
to understand the health of their businesses and 
have met or spoken with them during the year.

•  We have an established supplier relationship 

management framework, which provides a toolkit 
and guidance for easyJet managers who lead 
relationships with key partners.

•  We have a strong strategic relationship with the 
primary airports and work with them as strategic 
partners. The Board looks to engage with key 
suppliers whenever appropriate, and during the 
year it used the opportunity of a base visit at 
London Gatwick to meet with the management 
of Gatwick Airport Limited (see the Governance 
section on page 109). 

www.easyJet.com

31

STRATEGIC REPORT STA K EHOLDER  ENGAG EMENT  (CONT INUED)

Key focus
•  Understanding the financial and 
sustainable performance of the 
business 

•  Creation of long term value
•  Share price and dividend returns

Why we engage
Shareholders and investors are the main providers of 
capital with which to invest and grow the Group’s 
business. Taking account of their views on the 
Company’s operational and financial performance 
and its strategic direction are an important part 
of ensuring we deliver strong shareholder value. 
The support of the debt markets is important in 
ensuring access to appropriate liquidity.

How we engage
•  We engage with our shareholders regularly and 
consult with our major shareholders on specific 
issues to understand their views. During the year 
management and members of the Board led 
engagement in advance of the Annual General 
Meeting (AGM) held in December 2020, and our 
corporate brokers and proxy solicitation agents also 
spoke to a significant number of shareholders and 
provided feedback to the Board. Despite the AGM 
being held with restricted attendance due to the 
pandemic, facilities were made available for all 
shareholders to ask questions live at the AGM, as 
well as submit questions in advance.
•  Engagement also took place after key 

announcements and financial updates throughout 
the year, and prior to and during the rights issue 
launched in September 2021. Further details are 
included below and on page 108.

•  We have an active engagement programme 

with institutional investors through our Investor 
Relations department, including attendance at 
investor conferences, results presentations, 
individual investor meetings and engagement 
with equity research analysts.

•  Our Treasury team actively engage with our banks 

and credit rating agencies to ensure they are 
updated on the Company’s financial performance 
and liquidity.

Considerations and outcomes
•  Following engagement with shareholders in advance 
of the AGM, we were able to secure their support for 
the revisions to the Directors’ remuneration policy to 
ensure it remained consistent and aligned with our 
strategic priorities. While the resolutions relating to 
the appointment and re-appointment of all of the 
Directors were passed with the necessary majority, 
they received less than 58% in favour. The reasons 
for this outcome and the Board’s response are set 
out on page 107.

•  Moni Mannings, Chair of the Remuneration 

Committee, engaged with some of our major 
shareholders during the year specifically to discuss 
the targets relating to the December 2020 LTIP 
(Long Term Incentive Plan) award and when 
formulating the changes being proposed to the 
remuneration policy, which has provided an 
opportunity to incorporate their feedback 
around structure and quantum, while answering 
any questions they may have had on 
the proposed approach. 

•  The Company announced a 31 for 47 rights issue in 
September to raise gross proceeds of £1.2 billion. 
Major shareholders were engaged as part of this 
process and discussions with them centred around 
the timing and how the Board had determined the 
quantum of the raise. The rationale for the timing 
was explained, noting that the trading environment 
remained uncertain and having reviewed the Group’s 
long term capital and liquidity needs, the Board had 
determined that raising the additional equity at that 
time would not only protect the Company’s position 
in the European aviation sector and provide 
resilience from downside risks, but also improve 
management’s ability to deliver long term value. 
The factors that influenced the size of the equity 
raise were also discussed, including that it would 
provide resilience from future downside risks should 
the Covid-19 pandemic continue to dampen or delay 
the recovery of passenger volumes, and materially 
improve the ability to deliver long term value to 
shareholders by having flexibility to take advantage 
of long term strategic and investment opportunities. 
The initial take up was strong at 93%, despite 
the biggest major shareholder not participating, 
and the rights issue successfully concluded on 
28 September 2021.

Further details are set out in the Governance section 
which starts on page 96 and Remuneration section 
on page 130.

32

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

As a company listed on the 
London Stock Exchange, our 
shares are publicly traded. 
Some of our major 
shareholders are set out 
on page 156. We also have 
bonds issued under our 
EMTN Programme.

04. OUR Shareholders 
and investors

www.easyJet.com

33

STRATEGIC REPORT STA K EHOLDER  ENGAG EMENT  (CONT INUED)

We operate out of 28 bases 
across Europe and fly from 
153 airports. Our head office 
is at London Luton Airport, 
and we have training centres 
for crew in Milan and at 
London Luton and London 
Gatwick airports.

05. OUR Communities

34 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Key focus
•  Local employment
•  Sustainability, including carbon and 
other aircraft emissions; aircraft 
noise; energy usage; recycling and 
waste

•  Charitable activity

Why we engage
We value engagement with the communities 
where our employees live and operations are based, 
as they are important to the effective operation of 
our business.

How we engage
•  Our country directors and managers lead the 
community engagement in their markets. Our 
base managers are also part of their airport 
community and local discussions at their bases. 
•  easyJet employs people on local contracts in eight 
countries across Europe in full compliance with 
national laws and recognising their trade unions.

•  As part of our increased focus to highlight our 
sustainability efforts, a new social media series 
launched in the UK across all our social channels 
to create awareness on some of the projects 
and initiatives that we invest in as part of our 
carbon offsetting programme as well as 
measures we are taking within our operation to 
reduce our environmental impact. Our Sustainability 
team attended various workshops and aviation 
panel events to reinforce our focus on 
environmental innovation.

•  We work with individual airports and air traffic 

control teams to implement reduction in cabin waste 
and noise mitigation activities that seek to minimise 
the impact on local communities. Our employees 
also volunteer with local charities and organisations.

Considerations and outcomes
•  While many of our crew were unfortunately 

furloughed, we wanted to make sure their unique 
skill sets were valued and used in other ways. 
We worked with the UK Government to offer the 
ability for them to support the NHS’s roll out of 
the Covid-19 vaccination programme in the UK, 
with crew who applied being fast-tracked to 
become trained vaccinators. A total of 450 crew 
supported the programme.

•  On International Women’s Day, easyJet launched a 
virtual pilot school visits programme as part of its 
Amy Johnson Initiative to encourage more girls to 
become an airline pilot. Teachers, schools and 
parents are able to request a virtual visit from 
an easyJet pilot, who will join classrooms and 
assemblies via video link, providing young people 
across the UK with the opportunity to find out what 
the job of a pilot is really like and importantly, with 
many of the airline’s female pilots fronting the 
programme, to show them it’s a job for everyone.
•  We have partnered with Bristol Airport and other 

partners in the region to trial a range of initiatives to 
support the long term ambition to achieve net zero 
operations at the airport and contribute towards 
reducing easyJet’s overall carbon footprint. We are 
using Bristol Airport as a test-bed to trial and 
implement the latest technological and innovative 
solutions for decarbonising our operations and 
reducing waste. The aim is that any successful 
results from the trials will have the potential to be 
rolled out across easyJet’s network. This includes 
electric passenger coach transportation, recycling 
and waste management, and zero carbon emission 
aircraft turnarounds.

•  To make our uniforms more sustainable we are 
evolving to use a fabric that is made from 100% 
recycled plastic bottles and with a 75% lower carbon 
footprint. Over the course of five years, our new 
uniforms will be responsible for potentially preventing 
2.7 million plastic bottles from ending up in land fill or 
in our oceans.

•  As part of our partnership with Unicef, we have 

provided support in their global vaccination effort by 
collecting on board for the ‘Covid-19 Vaccines 
Appeal’ to allow our customers to support Unicef 
and make a difference to the ongoing battle 
against Covid-19. 

www.easyJet.com

35

STRATEGIC REPORT STA K EHOLDER  ENGAG EMENT  (CONT INUED)

Key focus
•  Compliance with regulations
•  Safety
•  Consumer protection
•  Health and safety
•  Treatment of suppliers
•  Sustainability
•  Quarantine restrictions 

Why we engage
Regulators and governments take decisions which 
directly impact our operations, as has been clearly seen 
during the Covid-19 pandemic. easyJet engages with 
them to understand their strategic drivers, understand 
the impact of any regulatory changes on the Company 
and customers, and ensure that policymakers have an 
understanding of our business and the social and 
economic benefits it delivers.

How we engage
•  The Executive Directors and management, including 
our country managers, engage with senior members 
of government and regulatory bodies on an ongoing 
basis. During the year, this has focused on achieving 
proportionate and risk-based restrictions to control 
the pandemic, and meeting with members of 
governments across Europe to seek support for the 
aviation industry, which has been one of the worst 
affected by the pandemic. 

•  Our country managers and directors also engage 
with governments in all markets where we have 
bases, at both a national and regional level.

•  Our Operations team engage with air traffic control 
operators and airline associations, such as NATS, 
IATA and EASA. We also work with business bodies 
across our network, such as A4E – for which our 
CEO, Johan Lundgren, has served as chair during 
the year – and tourism bodies, such as ABTA and 
the GSTC.

Considerations and outcomes
•  Management have engaged extensively with 
governments, and especially with the UK 
Government, during the year to ensure that they 
understand the impact of the pandemic on our 
business and take appropriate risk-based decisions in 
relation to travel restrictions and testing in the best 
interests of our customers. This has included 
contributing to the Global Travel Taskforce, which 
was established to look at the safe and sustainable 
return to international travel, and direct lobbying on 
matters specific to easyJet. Our employees also 
participated in the ‘Speak Up for Travel’ campaign to 
raise awareness of the challenges facing the travel 
industry. There has been no sector specific support 
for the industry, but progress has been made in 
removing some of the confusing restrictions around 
the traffic light system. We continue to engage to 

36 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

try and remove unnecessary and costly testing for 
those who are fully vaccinated. 

•  We also engaged with the European Commission 

on the launch of their ‘Fit for 55’ legislative package 
and continue to work closely with the European 
Commission (and other key stakeholders, including 
MEPs) on the details of the legislative package. 
easyJet agrees that delivering on climate change is 
the most important long term challenge for aviation 
and therefore it is critical that any fiscal measures 
applied to aviation support this aim. easyJet 
supports measures which link taxes to emissions, 
price carbon fairly for everyone and ensure all 
sources of aviation emissions are covered. Yet it is 
also important that all airlines and passengers are 
incentivised to fly more efficiently and we believe 
that there should be no double taxation, and that 
any fuel tax includes the replacement of all the 
ineffective passenger taxes in Europe. 

•  We continue to engage with policy makers across 
Europe on how public policy can help airlines to 
address their carbon emissions and stimulate the 
technological innovation that will be needed for 
zero emissions aviation. 

•  We have engaged with European governments to 
ensure that approaches to travel restrictions are 
co-ordinated and facilitate the inclusion of the UK in 
their travel frameworks.

•  Our approach with regulators such as Austro Control 
(Austria), the Civil Aviation Authority (UK) and the 
Federal Office of Civil Aviation (Switzerland) is open 
and transparent, which allows for a constructive 
relationship. It also enables us to quickly identify and 
address any regulatory concerns at an early stage.
•  We have also engaged with the regulators to keep 
them up to date on our financial and operational 
plans throughout the year.

•  We also participate in industry groups and forums 
that contribute to public policy development on 
sustainability issues. These include: the Aerospace 
Technology Institute, the Airspace Change 
Organisation Group, Airlines for Europe, Airlines UK, 
the Jet Zero Council (UK Government), the Science 
Based Targets initiative, Sustainable Aviation (UK), 
the Taskforce for Scaling Voluntary Carbon Offsets, 
and the World Economic Forum’s Target True Zero.

Section 172 Statement 
The Directors are required to act in a way 
they consider, in good faith, would most likely 
promote the success of the Company for the 
benefit of its members as a whole, taking into 
account the factors as listed in section 172 of 
the Companies Act 2006. 

Details of how the Directors have had regard 
to their section 172 duty can be found 
throughout the Strategic and Governance 
reports. We set out on the previous pages 
details of who we consider to be our main 
stakeholders, how we have engaged with 
them during the year and the outcomes of 
the process. Further details on how the 
Directors’ duties are discharged and the 
oversight of these duties are included in the 
Governance section on pages 96 to 158.

Our three pan-European airlines are 
regulated by Austro Control (Austria), 
the Civil Aviation Authority (UK) and 
the Federal Office of Civil Aviation 
(Switzerland). We engage with 
governments, regulators, policy makers, 
air traffic control operators, airline 
associations and tourism bodies.

06. Regulators  
and governments

www.easyJet.com

37

STRATEGIC REPORT SUSTAINABILITY

Our commitment  
to sustainability

At easyJet we are continuing to lead 
the work towards the decarbonisation 
of aviation. Ultimately, we want to use 
new aircraft technology to achieve net 
zero emissions flying across Europe. 
Johan Lundgren
Chief Executive Officer 

At easyJet we are continuing to lead the 
work towards the decarbonisation of 
aviation. Ultimately, we want to use new 
aircraft technology to achieve net zero 
emissions flying across Europe. 

Despite the impact of the pandemic, 
sustainability remains a fundamental part 
of our business. It is one of the core 
priorities within Our Strategy for easyJet. 

This year the extreme weather events 
that have been seen around the world 
are a further warning about the impact of 
climate change. Meanwhile world leaders 
gathered at COP26 to discuss further 
action. At easyJet we are committed to 
leading the aviation industry in taking 
the action needed.

We are fully committed to the UK and 
EU targets of net zero emissions by 2050. 
This year I have been the Chair of Airlines 
for Europe and was pleased that we were 
able to publish Destination 2050, a 
European aviation industry roadmap 
towards net zero.

In November 2021 we joined Race to Zero, 
through which we committed to set an 
interim science-based target for 2035, 
as well as to reach net zero emissions 
by 2050, aligning with the criteria and 
recommendations of the Science Based 
Targets initiative (SBTi). We will publish 
our net zero roadmap that shows how we 
plan to do this. We are confident that this 
will be deliverable through new technology, 
but it will also need a supportive policy 

framework from European governments 
and regulators.

package holidays we offer, becoming the 
first major tour operator to do this too.

Our Sustainability Strategy has three pillars: 
tackling our carbon emissions; stimulating 
technological innovation; and going 
beyond carbon. The plc Board, the Airline 
Management Board and I are closely 
involved in our progress on this strategy.

We continue to tackle our carbon 
emissions today by operating a fleet of 
modern, fuel-efficient aircraft and by 
always looking for more ways to be even 
more fuel and carbon efficient. Our Airbus 
A320 / 321 neo aircraft, which have been 
joining our fleet since 2017, are 15% more 
fuel-efficient per seat than equivalent 
previous-generation aircraft. This year we 
have established a partnership with Bristol 
Airport to trial new technologies to 
reduce emissions from our operations, 
including an aircraft turn trial using electric 
ground vehicles to reduce ground-based 
emissions to almost zero.

This builds on our decision in 2019 to 
offset all our organisation’s direct carbon 
emissions, from both our flights and 
ground operations (Scopes 1 and 2). 
easyJet was the world’s first major airline 
to do this across our entire network and 
we currently remain the only major 
European airline to do so. We have 
continued to offset on behalf our 
customers throughout the pandemic.

In May 2021 easyJet holidays also began 
offsetting carbon emissions for the 

We support the highest standard offsetting 
projects, that meet either the Gold 
Standard or Verified Carbon Standard 
(VCS) accreditation. A key focus is on 
projects that support reforestation, 
afforestation, and avoided deforestation in 
some of the most intense deforestation 
hotspots around the world. The loss of 
forests is one of the largest contributors to 
climate change, so work to protect and 
restore forests is a critical part of the 
response.

Offsetting is the right thing to do now, but 
it can only be an interim solution, in the 
period before the zero emissions 
technology that is being developed is 
available for commercial use. 

We also see Sustainable Aviation Fuels 
(SAFs) as another interim step in this 
journey. With our partner Gatwick Airport 
we have been trialling the use of 
Sustainable Aviation Fuels on some easyJet 
flights from the airport. This was the first 
time any airline at Gatwick has used SAFs.

We believe that radical action to address 
aviation’s impact on climate change is 
needed and so we are also supporting the 
introduction of new technologies. We are 
working with our partners Airbus and 
Wright Electric to accelerate the 
development of zero emission 
technologies.

38 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Our strategic partnership with Airbus 
supports their ambition to develop a zero 
emission, hydrogen-powered commercial 
aircraft by 2035. 

I was pleased to participate in the Airbus 
Summit on sustainable aerospace in 
September this year, at which we talked 
about the industry and government 
collaboration on the research, development 
and infrastructure that will be needed to 
realise the potential of this technology.

We are also working with Wright Electric 
who are developing the Wright 1, a 
single-aisle aircraft capable of covering a 
distance up to 1,280 km. Wright Electric 
is targeting 2030 as the earliest date for 
entry into service. In October 2021 we 
also established a new partnership with 
Rolls-Royce on research into new energy 
and power solutions in commercial aviation.

While carbon emissions are by far our 
biggest issue to tackle, we also want to 
manage our other environmental impacts. 
This year we have introduced a new 
Environmental Management System (EMS), 
made improvements to waste 
management in our operations, and added 
new environmental requirements to our 
procurement process. We have even 
introduced a new cabin crew and pilot 
uniform that uses a material made from 
around 45 recycled plastic bottles for each 
outfit. Once rolled out across the airline it 
has been estimated this could prevent 
around half a million plastic bottles being 
wasted each year.

The pandemic has also had an impact on 
the people who work at easyJet and we 
want to do what we can to support them 
through this period. We have provided our 
people with more advice about protecting 
their mental health and wellbeing.

I am pleased that we have been able to 
support our charity partner Unicef in their 
work to deliver Covid-19 vaccines to health 
workers and vulnerable people across the 
world. This summer our onboard collection 
for the charity’s vaccine programme raised 
over £275,000 which could help to deliver 
approximately 189,000 Covid-19 vaccines.

We are absolutely committed to 
sustainability. It is a fundamental part of our 
business and we know that aviation will 
need to continue to do more to address 
climate change. I trust our progress this 
year shows that we are continuing to take 
the action that is needed.

Johan Lundgren
Chief Executive Officer

Destination 
Zero Emissions

We’re proud to be a part of the UN’s Race to Zero initiative. 
By  joining,  we’ve  pledged  our  commitment  to  reaching 
net-zero  carbon  emissions  by  2050,  and  to  setting  an 
interim science-based target for 2035.

We recognise that aviation needs radical changes to keep 
the dream of flying alive for generations to come.

In the meantime, we’re taking more measures, both now 
and for the future, to reduce our emissions and minimise 
our impact on the environment.

easyJet.com/sustainability

www.easyJet.com

39

STRATEGIC REPORT  
 
 
SUSTAINABILITY  (CONTINUED)

Our Sustainability Strategy

To lead and challenge global aviation towards  
net zero emissions while positively impacting  
our communities and our people

Tackling  
carbon 
emissions

We were the world’s first major 
airline to offset the carbon emissions 
from the fuel used for all our flights, 
and continue to work tirelessly to 
minimise carbon across our operations

Stimulating  
technological  
innovation
We are supporting the development 
of new technologies to achieve the 
decarbonisation of aviation as 
quickly as possible 

Going  
beyond 
carbon
We are working in a range of ways 
to take action on sustainability, 
beyond our carbon impact 

•  Offsetting the carbon emissions 

•  Champion and collaborate to 

•  easyJet holidays strategy  

from fuel and operations

•  Continuously reduce the carbon 

achieve our goal of zero 
emissions aviation

intensity of our flying

•  Be an informed adopter of 

•  Advocate for smarter regulation  

for aviation that rewards 
carbon efficiency

Sustainable Aviation Fuels and 
advanced carbon capture 
technologies when available 
and commercially viable 

is for travel to make a positive 
impact on the environment 
and local communities

•  Commit to waste and plastic 
reduction at easyJet and 
within our supply chain

•  Engage our colleagues and  

our customers in our 
sustainability journey
•  Diversity, Inclusion and 
Wellbeing Strategy

•  Support charitable causes 
that our important to our 
customers and employees

Improving our underlying capability

We have continued to strengthen our organisation structures and expertise on sustainability. Initiatives include: 
expanding the Sustainability team; increasing the scope of ESG reporting; development of an ISO 14001-compliant 
Environmental Management System; and additional oversight through committees and working groups, such as the 
Environmental Management Review Board.

Net zero trajectory
We are fully committed to the UK and EU 
targets of net zero emissions by 2050. As 
part of Airlines for Europe we have also 
helped to develop Destination 2050, a 
European aviation industry roadmap 
towards net zero.

We also participated in the Aviation 
Working Group project-managed by the 
SBTi, WWF, the International Council on 
Clean Transportation (ICCT), other 
stakeholders and other airline peers to map 
out what a science-based trajectory and 
decarbonisation approach for the aviation 
sector. This guidance is available at: https://
sciencebasedtargets.org/sectors/aviation

In November 2021 we joined Race to Zero, 
through which we committed to set an 
interim science-based target for 2035, as 

well as to reach net zero emissions by 
2050, aligning with the criteria and 
recommendations of the Science Based 
Targets initiative (SBTi). We are developing 
our own detailed pathway to net zero, 
which we will publish in the 2022  
financial year.

We are confident that this will be 
deliverable through new technology 
and a supportive policy framework from 
European governments and regulators.  
It will be based on a combination of: our 
ongoing carbon efficiency measures, fleet 
replacement, air traffic management 
improvements including the proposed 
upgrade of Single European Sky, the use of 
Sustainable Aviation Fuels and ultimately 
the introduction of zero emissions aircraft 
technology.

United Nations sustainable 
development goals
Our strategy will contribute towards 
the achievement of the United Nations 
Sustainable Development Goals, which are 
a universal call to action to end poverty, 
protect the planet, and ensure that by 
2030 all people enjoy peace and prosperity.

Throughout this chapter we have 
signposted where our activity contributes 
to the goals.

This includes the carbon offsetting for our 
flights and holidays. We only invest in high 
quality Gold Standard and VCS certified 
offset projects, which deliver robust carbon 
savings and also a wide range of social and 
economic benefits to livelihoods and 
biodiversity in developing countries, which 
contributes to the UN Sustainable 
Development Goals (SDGs).

40 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

 
easyJet holidays 
Since easyJet holidays launched in 2019 
it has sought to integrate sustainability 
across the holidays business.

In May 2021, easyJet holidays became 
the first major UK tour operator to 
offset the carbon emissions directly 
associated with its package holidays. 
This means the fuel used for flights and 
in-destination transfers, as well as the 
energy used for hotel stays. This 
approach to offsetting was also 
retrospectively applied to all holidays 
since easyJet holidays launched in 
November 2019. 

Recognising that carbon offsetting is an 
interim measure and with an ambition to 
raise the bar and lead the industry, in 
September 2021 easyJet holidays launched 
its inaugural Sustainability Strategy. This 
strategy, which is set out below, includes 
easyJet holidays’ vision for sustainability 
and how they want to realise this. 
easyJet holidays has its own sustainability 
steering committee, which meets 
regularly to discuss and monitor 
progress on the strategy.

easyJet holidays this year become a 
member of the Global Sustainable Tourism 
Council (GSTC). The organisation was 

created jointly by UN agencies and 
international conservation NGOs to 
develop global standards for 
sustainability in travel and tourism. 
In becoming a member of GSTC, 
easyJet holidays has committed to 
support hotels it works with to achieve 
certification by a GSTC accredited 
certification body or certification to a 
GSTC recognised standard. easyJet 
holidays was also the first major UK tour 
operator to sign up to The Future of 
Tourism Coalition which has a global 
mission to place destinations at the 
centre of recovery strategies.

VISION

easyJet holidays Sustainability Strategy: A world where travel makes a positive impact 
on the environment and local communities 

MISSION

When it comes to sustainability we want to raise the bar, positively shake things up and lead the industry. To make 
sustainability part of our everyday culture, enabling us, our partners, and you to reduce your footprint, and make a positive 
impact on the people and places that make our destinations so special.

Create better holiday 
choices
by making sustainable travel 
affordable and accessible 
to everyone

PILLARS

Keep our holidays  
special
by maximising the benefits and 
minimising the negative impacts 
of tourism

Commitment
We will enable all holidaymakers to 
have authentic travel experiences 
that directly support sustainable 
practices

Commitment
We will support 100% of our hoteliers 
to achieve a GSTC-recognised 
certification and support locally owned 
and run businesses and activities

Provide
holidays that 
are carbon 
conscious

Inspire
holidaymakers 
to take 
meaningful 
actions to 
sustain the 
world’s natural 
and cultural 
resources 

FOCUS AREAS

Protect
natural 
environments, 
wildlife and 
natural 
resources when 
developing and 
managing 
tourism 
activities

Amplify
positive social 
and economic 
impacts of 
tourism in 
destinations to 
support 
livelihoods and 
community 
development 

Transform travel for 
everyone 
by embedding sustainability into 
business decisions and behaviours 
and driving meaningful change in 
the industry

Commitment
We will embed sustainability into 
our culture and business decisions 
while using our influence to move 
the industry forward

Empower
our people to 
make choices 
that are 
grounded in and 
guided by our 
commitment to 
sustainability

Pioneer
initiatives to 
bring the 
industry 
together and 
accelerate 
action on 
critical issues

Sustainable Development  
Goals Lab
In November 2021 easyJet holidays and 
the University of Oxford launched a 
partnership to establish the Oxford 
SDG Impact Lab, to work together to 
identify challenges and opportunities 
for sustainable tourism.

At the Oxford SDG Impact Lab selected 
students will be mentored and trained to 
deliver academically rigorous, evidence-
based reports whose aim is to improve 
key areas of social and environmental 
development in a number of destinations 
where easyJet holidays operates. Twenty 
graduate students, mainly from the social 
sciences and humanities, will be supported 
and mentored by Oxford University staff, 

as well as a dedicated team of experts 
from easyJet holidays.

The programme will culminate in 
September 2022, when the students will 
deliver their recommendation reports. 
easyJet holidays will then decide which 
projects it will champion, to develop and 
support sustainable practises in its focus 
holiday destinations.

www.easyJet.com

41

STRATEGIC REPORT SUSTAINABILITY  (CONTINUED)

How we manage 
sustainability

plc Board and Airline 
Management Board
The plc Board and the Airline Management 
Board regularly consider sustainability 
issues. For example, topics covered 
reviewing and guiding climate related 
strategy and monitoring and overseeing 
progress against goals and targets for 
addressing climate related issues, 
amongst others.

The Group Markets & Marketing Director 
is responsible on the Airline Management 
Board for the delivery of the Sustainability 
Strategy for the airline and easyJet 
holidays. The strategies are intended to 
mitigate risk and create opportunity 
through environmental and social 
sustainability principles, considering 
the differing challenges and priorities 
across our business.

Sustainability Steering 
Committee
The Sustainability Steering Committee 
monitors the progress being made on the 
strategies. The Committee has met eight 
times this financial year and attendees 
include the Chief Financial Officer, the 
Chief Commercial Officer, the Group 
Markets & Marketing Director, the Group 
General Counsel & Company Secretary, the 
Director of Flight Operations, the Director 
of Airport Development & Procurement, 
the Director of Tax & Fuel Procurement, 
the HR & People Development Director and 
the Director of Sustainability and the 
Sustainability team.

Sustainability team
We have a dedicated Sustainability team, 
led by the Director of Sustainability who 
reports to the Group Markets & Marketing 
Director. The team works with 
management across the business to 
develop and implement the Sustainability 
Strategy across the airline and works 
alongside the easyJet holidays team on 
their sustainability activities.

The team now includes three specialist roles: 

•  Carbon Manager – Managing and 

mitigating the carbon impact of our 
operations and reporting our progress, 
as well as driving carbon innovation 
across the business

•  Sustainability Manager – Implementing 

our Environmental Management System, 
improvements to waste management 
and recycling, as well as ensuring the 
minimisation of single use plastics and 
sustainability in procurement. 
•  Sustainable Business Manager – 

Strengthening our ESG reporting to 
ensure easyJet continues to meet 
disclosure expectations.

Remuneration targets on 
sustainability
Sustainability targets form part of the 
remuneration package for the CEO and 
CFO for this financial year. 

These targets focus on the implementation 
of our new Environmental Management 
System, management of the Company’s 
carbon emissions, partnerships on new 
technology development and further 
progress in the carbon offsetting 
programme.

Business key performance 
indicator on carbon emissions
Our ‘carbon emissions per passenger 
kilometre’ KPI, which is externally verified, 
is one of the business’s KPIs and  
is the responsibility of our Director of  
Flight Operations. The Director of Flight 
Operations also leads our work in developing 
sustainable aviation focused partnerships 
with organisations and on internal initiatives 
to stimulate technological innovation.

More information on our latest 
performance on this KPI is on page 47.

Environment Policy  
and Environmental 
Management System
Our Environment Policy sets out how the 
business manages and minimises our 
environmental impact and covers the 
activities of all who work for and on  
behalf of easyJet, including contractors, 
sub-contractors and temporary staff. 
The Environment Policy is available at: 
https://corporate.easyjet.com/

We have this year established an 
Environmental Management System to 
manage and continually improve our 
environmental performance in a 
systematic way. 

We also joined the IATA Environmental 
Assessment Program, which is aligned with 
the ISO 14001:2015 environmental 
management standard, and established an 
Environmental Management Review Board 
which is chaired by the Chief Operating 
Officer. Further information about this 
is on page 53.

Risk
Since 2018 we have included sustainability 
risks in the Risk section of our Annual 
Report, as these were deemed material. 
The risks include carbon trading and 
increased taxation, while severe weather 
as a result of climate change is now 
incorporated into safety, security and 
operations risk profile. Our response 
plans are monitored regularly through 
our governance structure.

For a detailed explanation of our 
sustainability risks, including climate-
change-related risks, and how these are 
managed, please refer to the Risks section 
on page 78. This year we have also 
strengthened our Task Force on Climate-
Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) 
reporting – there is an expanded table 
on pages 58 to 61.

42

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Sustainability in our supply chain
We continue to work closely with partners 
in our supply chain to ensure high 
sustainability standards. This year we have 
updated our Supplier Code of Conduct and 
implemented a new standard Request for 
Proposal template within our procurement 
process, to proactively screen suppliers’ 
management of sustainability and their 
environmental risk.

Our Supplier Code of Conduct is also 
based on easyJet’s Code of Business 
Ethics and requires our suppliers and 
their sub-contractors to operate to these 
ethical standards. Further information 
is on page 57.

We are also working with suppliers on 
specific initiatives and trials to reduce 
easyJet’s environmental impact and that 
of our supply chain. Examples of these are 
highlighted later in this chapter, such as our 
sustainability partnership with Bristol Airport 
(page 44), our SAF trial with Gatwick and 
fuel suppliers (page 49) and easyJet 
holiday’s work with hotel partners 
(page 57).

“Cambridge’s Resilience Framework supported easyJet 
to manage their climate change risks and opportunities. 
Our platform’s analysis provides quantified results to 
inform easyJet’s strategic decision making and 
future growth planning, while balancing investment 
requirements driven by evolving regulations, 
consumer demands, and technology innovations.” 
Dr Andrew Coburn, 
Chief Scientist, Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies

Customers
We regularly communicate with our 
airline and holidays customers about 
sustainability, including during the booking 
process and whilst on-board our aircraft. 
This focuses on our work to reduce the 
carbon impact of our operations, our 
carbon offsetting for all our flights, and 
the development of new technology to 
decarbonise aviation. We also have a 
dedicated, customer-facing website  
area about sustainability issues:  
https://www.easyjet.com/sustainability.

Our customer insight has found that 
customers who are aware that their flight 
has been carbon offset also have a higher 
overall satisfaction with easyJet. The 
difference in overall satisfaction between 
the groups of customers who were aware 
and not aware that their flight was carbon 
offset was 6.3 percentage points in this 
financial year. Customer awareness of our 
carbon offsetting, based on customers 
who have flown with easyJet in the last 
12 months, was 51.4%, compared to 
44.9% in the 2020 financial year.

Cambridge risk project
This financial year we have worked with the 
Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies (CCRS), 
an enterprise risk management specialist, 
on the business risk from climate change in 
both our direct and indirect operations. 

This work began with an assessment of the 
potential physical and transition risks to our 
business operations. As well as the CCRS 
experts, the assessment included input 
from teams across easyJet: Company 
Secretariat, Finance, Flight Operations, 
Investor Relations, Markets, Network, 
People, Policy, Risk, Strategy, Sustainability, 
and Treasury. The work with CCRS 
confirmed the summary risks that were 
outlined in our 2020 financial year 
Annual Report.

The output of this project will strengthen 
easyJet’s response to our climate risk 
and controls frameworks. It has also 
informed our responses to the 
requirements of the Task Force on 
Climate-related Financial Disclosures. 

Employee engagement
We have continued to communicate our 
commitment and action on sustainability 
to our employees.

This has included regular updates from 
our Chief Executive Officer and the wider 
AMB to all employees, updates and articles 
in our employee communications, and 
discussions about sustainability and 
presentations from the Sustainability team 
within departmental and leadership forums.

This year we carried out an employee 
survey about sustainability, which received 
nearly 500 responses. The results showed 
a strong interest in sustainability, support 
for easyJet to take further action and a 
desire for further information about the 
Company’s work in this area.

www.easyJet.com

43

STRATEGIC REPORT SUSTAINABILITY  (CONTINUED)

Bristol Airport partnership
This year we have formed a sustainability 
partnership with Bristol Airport and other 
partners in the region to trial a range of 
initiatives to support the long term 
ambition to achieve net zero operations at 
the airport and contribute towards 
reducing easyJet’s overall carbon footprint.

We are using Bristol Airport as a test-bed 
to trial and implement the latest 
technological and innovative solutions for 
decarbonising our operations and reducing 
waste. The aim is that any successful 
results from the trials will have the potential 
to be rolled out across easyJet’s network.

Trials which are underway or planned include: 

•  Electric ground power units 
•  Electric passenger coach transportation
•  Recycling and waste management 
•  Employee carbon-saving initiatives
•  Supply chain carbon reductions
•  Zero carbon emission aircraft turnarounds 
•  NEO aircraft deployment and 

fleet optimisation

•  Continuous descent approaches – in 

which the aircraft descends towards the 
runway at a continuous rate, rather than 
descending in stages, which can reduce 
fuel usage

We are also supporting the development of 
a regional hydrogen economy in the south 
west of England to prepare the way for 
hydrogen powered zero emissions aircraft 
during the next decade.

CDP climate change 
In 2020, we participated in the CDP climate 
change questionnaire programme and 
scored a “C” ranking. We have participated 
in the programme again this year and the 
results of this detailed assessment are 
expected to be published by CDP in late 
2021. Our full CDP submission and score is 
available on CDP website at www.cdp.net.

Public policy
We continue to engage with policy makers 
across Europe on how public policy can 
help airlines to address their carbon 
emissions and stimulate the technological 
innovation that will be needed for zero 
emissions aviation.

Our Sustainability Governance framework 
seeks to ensure that all direct and indirect 
activities that engage on policy are 
consistent with our Sustainability Strategy. 
The Sustainability team works closely with 
easyJet’s Regulatory Affairs Group and 
Public Affairs team, who seek to provide 
policy makers with information about 
easyJet’s work on sustainability and how 
airlines can work with governments to 
address the impact of aviation on 
climate change.

We believe that the aviation industry 
needs to achieve net zero by 2050 and 
are committed to both the EU and UK 
net zero 2050 targets. 

This year we have supported the EU’s ‘Fit 
for 55’ proposal, a new policy framework 
which aims to reduce net greenhouse 
gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030, 
compared to 1990 levels, and becoming 
a climate-neutral continent by 2050. 
We have also contributed to the UK 
Government’s consultation on its ‘Jet Zero’ 
strategy for net zero aviation.

An overview of our public policy priorities 
on sustainability are on the next page.

Materiality
In 2019 we completed a materiality 
assessment about sustainability issues 
for our airline business. 

The assessment was carried out by an 
independent sustainability firm in 
consultation with easyJet. It included 
in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, 
including investors, suppliers, regulators, 
corporate customers, employee 
representative groups and trade unions, 
and Non-Governmental Organisations 
(NGOs). Customer and employee views 
were also sought through surveys.

The results of the materiality assessment 
were published in our 2019 and 2020 
financial year Annual Reports and are 
available at https://corporate.easyjet.com

The assessment confirmed that the most 
material sustainability issue for the airline is 
carbon emissions. We have continued to 
address this, including through the project 
with the Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies 
on environmental risks and the activities 
described in the rest of this section of the 
Annual Report.

Our sustainability partnership 
with Bristol Airport includes 
trialling initiatives such as the 
use of electric ground 
vehicles and power units.

44 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Sustainability public policy priorities

Governments will need to help the 
aviation industry to meet ambitious 
emissions reduction goals by 
championing financial and regulatory 
support for green technologies and 
investments in zero emission aircraft.

Zero emission flying can only be 
brought closer through coordinated 
action which should focus efforts on 
three key areas:

1.   Governments need to support the 
development of hydrogen supply 
and infrastructure at airports, 
alongside investments into 
renewable energy to support 
the creation of green hydrogen 
for aviation.

2.  Governments will need to provide 
financial incentives to support the 
development and scaling up of zero 
emission technology, but also should 
be directing funds raised through 
aviation taxes into the research and 
development that is required.

3.  Airlines choosing to become early 
adopters of the new technology 
should be incentivised through 
reduced airspace charges and airport 
charges. There should also be tax 
exemptions and airport slot 
prioritisation for airlines operating 
zero emission aircraft.

We have also identified specific 
policy actions.

Investing and supporting the 
development of new technology now:

•  Support for the development of zero 
emission aircraft (ensuring that the 
current focus on SAF is not at the 
expense of zero emission 
technology)

•  Revenue raised from aviation taxes 
should be used to help fund R&D 
into hydrogen technology 

•  Support for the development of 

hydrogen supply and infrastructure 
at airports

•  Make investments into renewable 

energy (wind, solar etc.) to support 
the creation of green hydrogen 
for aviation

Ensuring there are incentives for the 
adoption of new technology in the 
future:

Provide financial incentives to support 
the development and growth of zero 
emission technology, including:

•  Tax exemptions for zero emission 

aircraft

•  Airspace charges should be 

modulated to incentivise early 
adopters of hydrogen powered 
aircraft 

•  Slot priority – airlines which fly 

hydrogen powered aircraft should 
be prioritised for peak slots at 
primary airports

•  Cost reduction of airport charges 

for zero emission aircraft

And in the meantime:

•  It is crucial the European Commission 
and national governments deliver on 
objectives for the Single European 
Sky. Allowing airlines to fly more 
direct routes could reduce European 
aviation’s emissions by up to 11%

•  Offsets should be formally 

recognised – as an interim step until 
new technologies are available at 
scale – this is something all carriers 
can start doing today

•  All airlines need to be part of 

decarbonisation, not just those flying 
short-haul or within the European 
Economic Area. This means giving 
equal treatment to all airlines, such 
as including long-haul flights in 
policies such as the EU Emissions 
Trading System, the EU’s proposed 
fuel tax, and any SAF mandates.

EU Fit for 55
This year we welcomed the ambition of 
the EU’s ‘Fit for 55’ package and set 
out how effective aviation tax reform 
would support this.

We support measures which link taxes 
to emissions, price carbon fairly for 
everyone and ensure all sources of 
aviation emissions are covered. 
However, there can be no double 
taxation, any fuel tax must include the 
replacement of all the ineffective 
passenger taxes in Europe with a 
combination of a fuel tax for intra-EU 
flights and a flight tax for long-haul 
flights that reflects their emissions. 
This way all airlines and passengers 
are incentivised to fly more efficiently. 
Everyone needs to play their part in 
tackling climate change, including 
long haul flights which create the 
majority of emissions.

The European Commission’s proposal 
for a fuel tax only for intra-EU flights 
means it falls short in this regard as it 
does not address long-haul and does 
not replace the current ineffective 
passenger taxes. Both would be 
required for our full support, so we 
have called on the Commission to 
address these next. Eurocontrol 
figures demonstrate that just 6% of 
flights (the long-haul ones) create 51% 
of the emissions from European 
aviation. Taxing everyday normal 
people, while excluding wealthy 
business class passengers emitting 
most of the CO2 on long-haul trips, is 
unfair and therefore we will continue 
to push for equal treatment.

Stakeholder groups
In addition to our direct engagement 
with policy makers, we also participate 
in industry groups and forums that 
contribute to public policy development 
on sustainability issues. These include: 
the Aerospace Technology Institute, 
the Airspace Change Organisation 
Group, Airlines for Europe, Airlines UK, 
the Global Sustainable Tourism Council, 
the Jet Zero Council (UK Government), 
the Science Based Targets initiative, 
Sustainable Aviation (UK), the 
Taskforce for Scaling Voluntary Carbon 
Offsets, and the World Economic 
Forum’s Target True Zero.

www.easyJet.com

45

STRATEGIC REPORT SUSTAINABILITY  (CONTINUED)

Tackling Carbon Emissions

Key SDGs

Overview
We continue to focus on reducing our 
organisational carbon footprint (Scope 1 
and 2 emissions), which has been a long 
term priority. We have been transitioning 
our fleet to more modern, fuel-efficient 
aircraft. While we did not take any new 
Airbus neo aircraft in this financial year, 
deliveries will resume in the 2022 financial 
year. Maximising fuel efficiency, and 
optimising passenger loads as much as 
possible, has been and remains a key 
focus area.

We continue to offset all the carbon from 
our operational carbon footprint as an 
interim measure, while new technologies 
are developed. This year we have formed 
a new partnership with Rolls-Royce to 
commence collaborating on sustainable 
aviation technology solutions. We have also 
been increasing our targeted messaging to 
customers about these issues, and our own 
people as we all have a role to play to 
tackle these sustainability challenges.

Mapping our carbon emissions
The measurement and reporting of our 
carbon emissions are aligned to the 
European Union’s Emissions Trading 
System (EU ETS), the Greenhouse Gas 
(GHG) Protocol and the recommendations 
of the Task Force on Climate related 
Financial Disclosures – refer to the 
dedicated table below. They also meet 
the requirements of the UK Government’s 
Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting 
regulations, 2019.

The GHG Protocol categorises emissions 
in three scopes:

•  Scope 1 – direct emissions from owned 
and leased assets (typically combustion 
of fossil fuels)

•  Scope 2 – indirect emissions from 

imported energy used in owned assets 
(typically grid electricity)

•  Scope 3 – all other indirect emissions 

resulting from upstream and 
downstream business activity, e.g. supply 
chain, business travel, aircraft 
components, etc.

This year we have again worked with The 
Carbon Trust, a global climate change and 
sustainability consultancy, on our carbon 
mapping and reporting work.

Our carbon emissions are calculated and 
expressed as a suite of carbon dioxide 
equivalent (CO2e) figures in metric tonnes. 
We use the operational control approach, 
in which we include emissions from 
activities where we control the operation 
and use published, up to date emission 
factors issued by competent authorities, 
(e.g. UK Government departments 
including BEIS and DEFRA).

The 2021 financial year carbon mapping 
work estimated that 99.87% (2020: 
99.96%) of easyJet’s organisational (Scope 
1 and 2) carbon emissions was as a result 
of the use of aircraft fuel across our fleet. 

Greenhouse gas and energy performance

Global emissions

UK only emissions

803,463
760
804,223

FY21

Global emissions
(excl. UK) 

1,311,498
28
1,311,526

FY20

Global emissions
(excl. UK) 

2,069,375
143
2,069,518

Global emissions UK only emissions

2,177,784
833
2,178,617

4,247,159
976
4,248,135
1,145,845

5,393,980

3,238,837,186
3,576,743

5,292,183,044
122,794

17,138,339,131 8,787,980,066 8,350,359,065
560,946

3,570,851

4,131,797

3,242,413,929 5,292,305,838

17,142,470,928
3,146,196

8,791,550,917 8,350,920,011

easyJet plc 
gCO2/RTK
81.08

easyJet plc 
gCO2/RTK

810.77

FY21

easyJet plc
gCO2/RTK
81.89

FY21

easyJet plc 
gCO2/RTK

818.9

easyJet plc 
gCO2/RTK
70.77

easyJet plc 
gCO2/RTK
N/A

FY20

easyJet plc 
gCO2/RTK
71.48

FY20

easyJet plc 
gCO2/RTK
N/A

Scope 1 – tonnes of CO2e
Scope 2 – tonnes of CO2e
Total Scope 1 & 2 – tonnes of CO2e
Scope 3 – tonnes of CO2e
Total carbon footprint – S1, 2 & 3 
tonnes of CO2e
Scope 1 energy use (kWh)
Scope 2 energy use (kWh)

Total energy use (kWh)
Scope 1 & 2
Carbon offsets in tonnes of CO2e

2,114,961
788
2,115,749
585,443

2,701,192
8,531,020,231
3,699,537

8,534,719,768
2,120,772

Carbon emissions/revenue passenger km

Intensity metric

Carbon emissions/revenue passenger km

Carbon emissions/revenue tonne km

Intensity metric

Carbon emissions/revenue tonne km

46 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Total carbon emissions
Our total carbon dioxide equivalent 
emissions from the fuel used in our flights 
was 2,112,906 tonnes in the 2021 financial 
year, compared to 4,264,435 in the 2020 
financial year.

This total figure for the 2021 financial year 
is significantly reduced compared to the 
previous year due to the reduced flying 
that took place due to the effects of 
the pandemic.

Carbon emissions methodology
In addition to our primary intensity metric 
expressed as grams of carbon dioxide 
equivalent per passenger kilometre, we 
have also included grams of carbon 
dioxide per revenue passenger kilometre. 
However, as in the past we have reported 
in grams of carbon dioxide per revenue 
passenger kilometre, we have continued 
to include this.

For the first time this year, we have 
also included our carbon emissions per 
passenger km per Revenue Tonne 
Kilometre as this metric is used by 
some stakeholders and investors.

During the 2021 financial year, we have 
expanded the scope of our reporting to 
include fugitive emissions from chillers 
and air conditioning equipment which 
is included in Scope 1.

In the 2020 financial year, we reviewed and 
updated our carbon intensity calculation 
methodology, so that it aligned more 
closely with established industry 
methodologies. The methodology used 
follows the protocols outlined in the BS EN 
16258 – 2012, “Methodology for calculation 
and declaration of energy consumption 
and GHG emissions of transport services 
(freight and passengers)” document. This is 
the methodology that airlines with 
operations within the EU and beyond follow 
to comply with the EU’s Emissions Trading 
System requirements.

We have adopted the convention of using 
Great Circle Distance (GCD) plus a fixed 
correction factor of 95km for each sector 
in this reporting year, as recommended by 
the EU ETS reporting methodology. This is 
also in line with the ICAO Carbon Emissions 
Calculator Methodology. This approach is 
intended to better reflect the actual 
distance flown in each flight. Completed 
flight data, fuel in tanks, fuel density, 
booked (revenue) passengers and GCD are 
recorded for each flight. Internal checking 
processes are applied to data on a regular 
basis for the purpose of ensuring data is of 
a high, robust quality for internal and 
external reporting requirements. 

We have used UK Government’s 
Department for Environment, Food & Rural 
Affairs’ GHG Conversion Factors for 
Company Reporting, which were last issued 
in June 2021.

Non-carbon dioxide effects
We know that aviation also contributes 
to non-carbon dioxide climate effects in 
the atmosphere and despite recent 
studies highlighting these effects, more 
robust research is required to provide 
further guidance on how best to tackle 
these impacts.

Emissions per gram per 
passenger kilometre since 2016

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

81.08
81.08

70.77
70.77

70.41
70.41

71.5671.56

72.46
72.46

73.96
73.96

In a trial with partners at 
Gatwick Airport, some 
easyJet flights have been 
powered by Sustainable 
Aviation Fuels.

Carbon emissions per passenger 
kilometre
Our intensity metric is expressed as grams 
of carbon dioxide equivalent (gCO2e) per 
passenger kilometre (RPK). This is a 
measure of on average how many grams 
of carbon dioxide equivalent are emitted 
for each kilometre travelled by each 
passenger on an easyJet aircraft.

In 2021 financial year our carbon dioxide 
emissions per passenger kilometre was 
81.08g, compared to 70.77g in the 2020 
financial year.

The effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on 
aviation has also had a significant effect on 
this intensity metric. The main reason for 
this is that our load factor, the average 
proportion of seats occupied on each 
flight, has reduced. This means that the 
carbon emissions from each flight are 
shared between a smaller number of 
passengers. This effect was more 
significant in the 2021 financial year than 
the 2020 financial year as the previous 
financial year included the period October 
2020 to February 2021 before the start of 
the pandemic in Europe.

We have been able to somewhat reduce 
this effect by prioritising the use of our 
more efficient A320 / A321 neo aircraft, 
which are typically 15% more efficient per 
seat kilometre flown compared to the 
aircraft that they replaced. However, this 
has not prevented the intensity metric from 
increasing above pre-pandemic levels.

In 2017 we set a target of a 10% reduction 
in carbon dioxide emissions per passenger 
kilometre from our flights by the end of the 
2022 financial year, compared to our 2016 
figures. The effects of the pandemic have 
significantly affected our progress towards 
this target and currently we do not expect 
to meet this planned reduction in 2022.

Third party verification
Our intensity metrics are verified by a 
third-party specialist auditor, Verifavia. 
Verifavia used a reasonable assurance 
approach to review easyJet’s 2021 financial 
year aircraft fuel burn, Revenue Passenger 
Kilometre, Revenue Tonne Kilometre and 
associated output CO2 and CO2e KPIs. 
Whilst this verification approach only 
focuses on our airline emissions, these 
equated to 99.87% in the 2021 financial 
year of our Scope 1 and 2 carbon footprint.

Verifavia’s detailed assurance 
statement is available at  
http://corporate.easyjet.com/.

www.easyJet.com

47

STRATEGIC REPORT Sustainable Aviation Fuels
We believe Sustainable Aviation Fuels 
(SAFs) will be part of our decarbonisation 
pathway, as and when they become more 
widely available and affordable. However, 
we do not see SAFs as the ultimate 
decarbonisation solution for short-haul 
aviation, since current pathways are not 
zero emissions.

At present, SAFs are typically several times 
the price of jet fuel, but forecasts predict 
that this differential will drop as SAFs scale 
and are adopted.

In the long term they are best suited to 
long-haul flying where there may not be 
alternatives to using SAFs. We support the 
development of genuine zero emissions 
technologies for short-haul and are 
optimistic that we could begin flying our 
customers on planes powered by 
hydrogen-combustion, hydrogen-electric or 
a hybrid of both by the mid to late-2030s.

SUSTAINABILITY  (CONTINUED)

Efficient aircraft
We operate a fleet of modern, efficient 
Airbus A320-family aircraft. In 2017 we took 
delivery of our first Airbus A320neo aircraft 
(New Engine Option technology) and in 
2018 our larger capacity Airbus A321neo 
aircraft entered into operation, offering 49 
additional seats per aircraft and further 
reducing fuel-burn per passenger flown.

The “neo”-type aircraft (both A320 and 
A321 variants), are Airbus’ new generation 
of narrow-body aircraft, replacing the 
“ceo”-type (Current Engine Option) variants 
of the same model. Equipped with CFM 
International’s LEAP-1A engines, these new 
generation aircraft have at least a 15% 
proven fuel-burn efficiency over their 
previous generation aircraft, a 50% lower 
noise footprint during take-off and landing, 
and also offer a up to 50% margin on NOx 
emissions versus CAEP/6 Standard.

This new generation of aircraft currently 
make up 16% of our fleet and will continue 
to increase as we take delivery of the 
aircraft on our orderbook and retire our 
older aircraft. During the period of reduced 
utilisation due to the Covid-19 pandemic, 
we focused our operation on flying these 
more efficient neo-type aircraft and our 
smaller gauge Airbus A319 aircraft, 
whilst storing and parking our older 
A320ceo aircraft.

Whilst we did not have any new aircraft 
deliveries in the 2021 financial year, we will 
take delivery of eight neo aircraft in the 
2022 financial year, seven in the 2023 
financial year and plan to take 18 in the 
2024 financial year. easyJet is the largest 
single brand operator of Airbus neo 
aircraft in Europe.

In addition to the neo-technology aircraft, 
since 2013 our A320ceo aircraft have been 
delivered with “Sharklet” wingtips (also 
standard on the neo variants), reducing 
drag and fuel-burn by 2-3% per hour flown. 
To further increase the efficiency of our 
A320 fleet, 93% of our A320 fleet has 
either been delivered in, or retrofitted to 
the increased density Spaceflex 
configuration. This space-saving layout 
reconfigures unused space in the rear 
galley to increase space in the cabin, 
freeing up space for six additional seats. 
The seats of these aircraft have also been 
converted to the slim-line lightweight 
Recaro design (also standard on all of our 
neo deliveries), further reducing the weight 
(and fuel-burn) of the aircraft.

Number of aircraft by type

Aircraft type

A319
A320
A320neo
A321neo

Total

Number

97
160
37
14

308

Percentage  

of fleet

31.5%
52.0%
12.0%
4.5%

100%

Efficient operations 
We continue to operate our aircraft as 
efficiently as possible and are always 
looking for efficiency improvements. This 
includes adjusting standard operating 
procedures, which helps to reduce fuel 
usage and therefore carbon emissions.

All measures are taken only when safe and 
practical to do so, within the constraints of 
the operational environment.

Initiatives include: 

•  The use of single-engine taxi procedures 

on arrival and departure

•  Nowcast inflight weather uplinks.  

This advanced wind-selection algorithm 
improves flight trajectory and reduces 
fuel burn

•  Optimisation of the climb speed to cruise 

altitude, which facilitates reaching a 
more fuel-efficient phase of flight sooner

•  Optimised flap configuration on the 

approach to landing, allowing the aircraft 
to be more aerodynamically efficient
•  The use of ground power by our aircraft 
when on-stand at airports, reducing the 
use of the aircraft’s auxiliary power unit 
(APU) to cut noise, fuel and emissions
•  Engine washing to remove debris, which 
improves the air turbine efficiency. This 
year we carried out 349 engine washes.
•  Reviewing and optimising the amount of 
discretionary fuel uplifted on each flight. 
Captains always have the final decision 
on the fuel required for flight and safety 
remains the highest priority

We also continue to retrofit our aircraft 
with the latest fuel efficiency upgrades, 
including a wiring modification to enable 
single engine taxiing without using the APU 
and a descent profile optimisation upgrade 
for the flight management system which 
supports more fuel-efficient descents.

48 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

London Gatwick SAF trials
In a trial with partners at Gatwick 
Airport, some easyJet flights have been 
powered by Sustainable Aviation Fuels 
(SAF). This was the first time any airline 
at Gatwick has used SAF. The trial was 
delivered in partnership with fuel 
supplier Q8Aviation, Gatwick Airport 
and SAF producer Neste.

Q8Aviation delivered the first supply of 
Neste MY Sustainable Aviation Fuel™ 
on 19 October 2021 and the trial 
involved 42 flights in total. While the 
initial volume of SAF was relatively 
small, the initiative is an initial step 
towards extending the use of 
Sustainable Aviation Fuel at the airport. 

Neste’s MY SAF is produced from 100% renewable and 
sustainable waste and residue raw materials, such as used 
cooking oil and animal fat waste. In its neat form and over its 
life cycle, MY SAF can achieve a reduction of up to 80% of 
greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil jet fuel use. 

Energy and carbon 
efficiency activity
As part of our ground-based energy 
efficiency measures, we have continued to 
roll out new, more-efficient LED lighting 
across the Luton head office campus and 
completed the conversion of all outside 
lighting at Hangar 89 at London Luton 
Airport.

During the Covid-19 pandemic and local 
lockdowns across our European network, 
we made the decision to mothball the 
majority of our office sites including our 
Head Office in Luton and our largest site, 
Hangar 89, at London Luton Airport to 
reduce unnecessary energy usage. 

In the 2021 financial year, the percentage 
of renewable sources of electricity our 
business used across our buildings and 
airport partner locations increased as 
more locations switched their 
procurement choices. In the 2021 
financial year, this equated to 52% of 
our total electricity demand.

Carbon offsetting 
Decarbonising our flights is a huge 
challenge that requires a variety of 
solutions. As we continue to support 
development of new aircraft technology 
and improve fuel efficiency, we also want 
to take what other action we can now. 
This is why, since November 2019, we have 
offset 100% of our organisation’s direct 
carbon emissions, from both our flights and 
ground operations (Scope 1 and 2), while 
we work to reduce emissions structurally in 
the medium and long term. We carefully 
select projects that actively take carbon 
out of the atmosphere or avoid the release 
of additional carbon. 

easyJet was the world’s first major airline 
to do this across its entire network and we 
currently remain the only major European 
airline to do so.

Offsetting is a powerful tool to tackle 
current unavoidable emissions while driving 
finance to impactful, vital projects that 

offer environmental benefits, but also 
provide capital and low-carbon technologies 
to local economies. These projects are key 
to protect and restore ecosystems, tackle 
deforestation and enhance biodiversity while 
improving the health and livelihoods of 
millions of people who need it most.

At easyJet we do not see carbon offsets 
as an alternative solution to our carbon 
reductions efforts. Carbon offsetting is a 
tool for speeding up climate action and 
an interim measure, in addition to our top 
priority being carbon reductions. That’s why 
we’re also working right now with industry-
leading technology partners, Airbus and 
Wright Electric, to accelerate the 
development of zero emission technologies 
and we are optimistic that we could begin 
flying our customers on planes powered by 
hydrogen-combustion, hydrogen-electric or 
a hybrid of both by the mid to late 2030s. 
easyJet also engages with policymakers 
and lawmakers to help ensure the 
regulatory environment supports the 
adoption of zero-emissions aircraft in 
commercial aviation.

We employ a rigorous process to select the 
schemes we buy credits from. Our portfolio 
of projects all meet either the Gold Standard 
or VCS (Verified Carbon Standard) 
certification, which are globally recognised 
and respected for their standards of 
offsetting. Their certifiers check projects 
to ensure the carbon reductions they are 
claiming would not have happened without 
the project, and that by reducing carbon 
emissions in one place they do not 
inadvertently increase them elsewhere.

The schemes include nature-based credits 
such as reforestation, afforestation, and 
avoided deforestation, including borehole 
rehabilitation and cookstoves projects, in 
some of the most intense deforestation 
hotspots around the world. These projects 
are effective in reducing deforestation, but 
they also work with local communities to 
deliver programmes for alternative income 
generation which incentivises the protection 
of forests over the long term.

Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary 
Carbon Markets
We are a participant in the Taskforce on 
Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets 
(TSVCM), an initiative launched in 2020 by 
Mark Carney, the former Governor of the 
Bank of England and now UN special envoy 
for climate action and finance, sponsored 
by the Institute of International Finance.

TSVCM’s objective is to set a clear pathway 
towards scaling voluntary carbon markets 
while ensuring they are well governed, 
transparent, verifiable and robust. A newly 
formed independent governance body, 
composed of representatives from 12 
countries, with 40% from the developing 
world, will review the work already 
conducted by the taskforce and engage 
experts from a wide range of sectors 
where concerns about integrity have arisen. 
Representatives of indigenous and local 
communities are also part of the 
governance body.

Offsetting for our flights
In the 2021 financial year we retired 2.12 
million carbon credits to offset the carbon 
emissions of the fuel used in all our 
flights. Since we began offsetting in 
November 2019, we have retired 
5.27 million carbon credits.

‘Retiring’ a carbon credit means it is taken 
off the market — never to be traded again. 
First Climate and Carbon Clear Ltd (Eco 
Act) procured these credits on our behalf; 
and the related retirement certificates are 
available at https://corporate.easyjet.com/.

easyJet holidays offsetting
In May 2021, easyJet holidays began 
offsetting carbon emissions from its 
package holidays, comprising the fuel used 
for flights and in-destination transfers, as 
well as the energy used from hotel stays. 
easyJet holidays was the first major tour 
operator to do this. The offsetting was also 
retrospectively applied to all holidays since 
easyJet holidays launched in 
November 2019. 

100% 

of easyJet’s CO2 footprint 
(Scopes 1 and 2) offset since 
November 2019

www.easyJet.com

49

STRATEGIC REPORT SUSTAINABILITY  (CONTINUED)

The Pulau Borneo project

Borneo, in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, is 
the third-largest island in the world and 
home to the world’s oldest tropical 
rainforests. Known for their rich biodiversity, 
their forests shelter thousands of endemic 
animal, reptile, insect and plant species. 
They have also experienced the destructive 
effects of heavy logging and conversion to 
land use, such as palm oil. Local 
communities have proven to be the best 
guardians of their territories, living in 
balance with their environment, but as 
forest resources become depleted, villagers 
feel forced to leave their communities 
looking for security and job opportunities. 

As part of our offsetting scheme and 
environment protection efforts, easyJet 
has been supporting one of the local 
initiatives, the Pulau Borneo Project, which 
for over a decade has successfully 
defended 64,500 hectares of carbon and 
biodiversity – rich lowland peat forest from 
conversion to palm oil plantations, which 
surround the project area and the adjacent 
Tanjung Puting National Park, a UNESCO 
Biosphere Reserve. The project protects 
over 120 threatened and endangered 
species in the project area and supports 
over 10,000 forest-dependent community 
members living in and along the boundaries 

of the project, who have traditionally held 
no formal land tenure.

Working hand in hand with local staff from 
the Tanjung Putting National Park, the 
project supports the protection of forests 
in the project area from illegal logging, 
hunting of endangered species, forest fires 
and other illegal activities. 54 forest patrols 
were conducted in 2020, ensuring the 
protection of carbon and biodiversity 
stocks against degradation and 
deforestation. 

Pulau Borneo is the world’s first forest 
conservation project registered to the 
Sustainable Development Verified Impact 
Standard (SD VISta). SD VISta was 
developed by Verra, a leading standards 
organisation created to help countries, 
businesses and civil society achieve 
ambitious sustainable development and 
climate action goals, enabling projects to 
assess and report the sustainable 
development benefits they generate 
directly against the UN Sustainable 
Development Goals (SDGs). Verified by a 

easyJet’s carbon offsetting 
has been supporting the 
Pulau Borneo Project in 
Indonesia, which is defending 
large areas of peat forest.

©EcoAct-InfiniteEARTH

50 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

third-party assessor, the project has 
demonstrated its progress against the 
SDGs transparently and rigorously, 
keeping driving finance to support and 
scale up its high-impact activities. 

When Covid-19 pandemic reached the 
remote communities in the area, where 
basic health services were lacking, the 
Pulau Borneo project was able to 
provide additional support. This included 
the provision of face masks, public 
health information displays and a 
‘floating clinic’ to provide frontline care 
to communities in the area.

Project impacts up to 2020 
(These are of the overall project – not 
just activity supported by easyJet)

Community

•  2,173 households now have water 
filters, improving sanitation and 
protecting their lives. Clean and safe 
drinking water is now accessible 
through 3 Water Purifying Systems
•  1,800 households with no access to 
electricity now have a solar light that 
helps them cook at night or assists 
children in the studies after dark while 
reducing air pollution exposure. 
•  Two solar power plants installed in 

two villages

•  Floating health clinic built and 

operational, assisting 800 people 
•  Two libraries built; $150,000 worth 

scholarship fund established

Forest and wildlife impacts
•  47,237 hectares of High Conservation 
Value, High Carbon Stock peat forest 
ecosystems (64,500 total hectares) 
have been prevented from being 
converted to palm oil

•  Pulau Borneo has planted 

approximately 350,145 trees, sourced 
from community nurseries that the 
project funded and paid the 
communities to plant

•  Significant investment in fire 

prevention and suppression has been 
made, specifically involving 
communities directly in the 
educational, training and preparation 
process

•  Pulau Borneo has partnered with the 
Orangutan Foundation International 
to rescue and rehabilitate orangutans 
that have wandered into villages. At 
least a dozen individuals were 
reported and have been rescued from 
surrounding villages and palm oil 
estates since the project’s inception. 
25 additional individuals have been 
repatriated into Pulau Borneo.

Stimulating technological innovation

Key SDGs

Overview
We want to lead the decarbonisation of 
aviation, and ultimately achieve zero 
emission flying across Europe. We believe 
that radical action to address aviation’s 
impact on climate change is needed and so 
we are supporting the introduction of new 
technologies. 

We are working with our partners, including 
Airbus and Wright Electric, to accelerate 
the development of zero emission 
technologies. 

Partnerships
Airbus
In 2019 we signed a Memorandum of 
Understanding with Airbus for research on 
electric, hybrid-electric and hydrogen 
aircraft. The aim is to study operational and 
infrastructure opportunities and challenges 
with new propulsion technologies. 

In September 2020, Airbus unveiled three 
hydrogen-powered concept planes: a 
turbofan, a turboprop and blended wing 
body fuelled aircraft concept. Airbus’ 
intention is to launch the ZEROe aircraft 
programme with a full-scale prototype by 
late 2020s – for entry into service by 2035.

The ZEROe concept aircraft enables 
Airbus to explore a variety of configurations 
and hydrogen technologies that will shape 
the development of our future zero 
emission aircraft.

All three ZEROe concepts are hybrid-
hydrogen aircraft. They are powered by 
hydrogen combustion through modified 
gas turbine engines. Liquid hydrogen is 
used as fuel for combustion with oxygen. 
In addition, hydrogen fuel cells create 
electrical power that complements the 
gas turbine, resulting in a highly efficient 
hybrid-electric propulsion system. All of 
these technologies are complementary, 
and the benefits are additive.

A team from easyJet, including our CEO, 
participated in the Airbus Summit on 
sustainable aerospace in September this 
year. The event brought together the 
aviation industry and stakeholders to 
discuss the actions that will be needed to 
deliver this technology.

Airbus has unveiled three 
hydrogen-powered concept 
planes: a turbofan, a 
turboprop and blended wing 
body fuelled aircraft concept. 

© AIRBUS 2020 - All rights reserved - IIVS

Aerospace Technology Institute and FlyZero

demands and market opportunity of 
potential zero carbon emission 
aircraft concepts. 

Captain David Morgan, Director of 
Flight Operations, and Bristol based 
First Officer Debbie Thomas are both 
members of the Aerospace Technology 
Institute and involved in the FlyZero 
programme.

Debbie is currently on a secondment 
working within the FlyZero project as an 
Aircraft Modeller to help accelerate the 
aviation path to zero carbon aircraft. 
Before retraining as a commercial pilot, 
Debbie worked as an aerospace 
engineer for 16 years in modelling and 
simulation. She is now bringing this 
experience, as well as her perspective 
as a pilot, to the FlyZero project.

The UK Aerospace Technology Institute 
(ATI) last year established the FlyZero 
initiative to help the UK aerospace 
industry develop a zero carbon emission 
aircraft by 2030. 

The FlyZero programme brings together 
around 100 people seconded from 
industry and academia and has received 
a £15 million grant from the UK 
Department for Business, Energy and 
Industrial Strategy (BEIS). FlyZero is 
conducting a detailed and holistic study 
of the design challenges, manufacturing 

www.easyJet.com

51

STRATEGIC REPORT UK Sustainable Aviation
easyJet is a member of Sustainable 
Aviation (SA), a coalition of UK airlines, 
airports, aerospace manufacturers and air 
navigation service providers. As a group, 
SA has committed to achieving net zero 
emissions by 2050, through an 
international approach, working with 
governments around the world and 
through the UN.

In June 2021 Sustainable Aviation 
announced new interim decarbonisation 
targets of at least 15% by 2030 and 40% 
by 2040, having reaffirmed its 
commitment to net zero by 2050.

Sustainable Aviation’s roadmap includes the 
use of SAFs, airspace modernisation to 
deliver more efficient flying, the 
commercialisation of carbon removal 
technologies, and new low and zero carbon 
technologies – powered by hydrogen-
combustion, hydrogen-electric or a hybrid 
of both – becoming mainstream in 
the 2030s.

SUSTAINABILITY  (CONTINUED)

Wright Electric
Since 2017 we have been working with 
Wright Electric to support the development 
of a zero emission aircraft. 

We believe that hydrogen will play a big 
part in future zero emission technology, as 
hydrogen has the ability to be combusted 
directly or converted to electricity via a fuel 
cell. High power electric motors are 
therefore likely to play an important role in 
future zero emission aircraft, either 
independently or as a hybrid, together with 
hydrogen combustion.

Wright is currently engineering electrical 
systems at the megawatt scale which will 
be necessary for commercial aircraft. These 
components will form the power plant of 
Wright’s revolutionary Wright 1 aircraft. 

In September 2021 Wright announced that 
it had successfully produced and started 
testing a two megawatt electric powertrain 
motor, which it believes is the most 
powerful electric propulsion motor of its 
kind in development and a key component 
for a zero emission aircraft system. 
This follows the successful testing of its 
next-generation inverter technology 
earlier in 2021. 

Wright is then moving to the next phase of 
development including integration with an 
in-house developed highly efficient inverter, 
high altitude chamber testing, and 
gathering testing data for future aircraft 
certification. Wright remains committed to 
pushing the development of the electric 
powertrain to meet the requirements of 
the aerospace community, with progressive 
development over the next two years. 

Wright commenced ground testing in 2021, 
and has said it will focus on propulsion fan 
development in 2022 and flight testing will 
commence as early as 2023.

UK Jet Zero Council
Our Chief Executive Officer, Johan 
Lundgren, is a member of the UK 
Government’s Jet Zero Council. Members 
of our Sustainability, Policy and Operations 
teams also participate in discussions within 
the Council and its working groups.

The Jet Zero Council brings together the 
UK Government and industry to accelerate 
the development of a UK Sustainable 
Aviation Fuel industry and commercialise 
zero emission flight.

The current focus areas of the Jet Zero 
Council are:

•  Zero emissions aircraft – accelerate 
the design, manufacture, testing, 
certification, infrastructure and 
commercial operation of zero emission 
aircraft and aviation systems in the UK 
through sustained investment in applied 
research and development and fostering 
greater collaboration across sectors.
•  Sustainable Aviation Fuels – accelerate 
the delivery of SAF by supporting the 
investment in first-of-a-kind SAF plants, 
supporting research and development 
of new pathways and driving down 
production costs through upscaling 
and innovation.

World Economic Forum’s Target 
True Zero Aviation
The World Economic Forum’s Target True 
Zero initiative is working to accelerate the 
deployment and scaling of zero emission 
aviation, including electric and hydrogen 
flight technologies.

easyJet is participating in the initiative, 
along with other partners such as Airbus, , 
Boeing, Rolls-Royce, Schiphol Airport, 
Wright Electric, Zeroavia, McKinsey and 
Company, and the Aviation Impact 
Accelerator at the University of Cambridge.

This initiative is looking at what is needed 
to unlock the potential of true zero 
emission aviation in the areas of 
technology, industry dynamics, 
infrastructure and supply chain, regulation, 
and public acceptance.

Rolls-Royce
We are collaborating with Rolls-Royce to 
research and progress thinking on the 
operational and economic implications of 
deploying new energy and power solutions 
in the commercial aviation sector. 

New forms of propulsion and energy will 
require new infrastructure and operational 
requirements. The solutions are complex 
and require the ecosystem to be adapted 
at all levels.

The work will bring together key 
stakeholders operating across the aviation 
value chain (in addition to Rolls-Royce and 
easyJet subject matter experts) who will 
model and understand the implications of 
deploying new energy such as hydrogen 
at scale. These will be key avenues of 
enquiry to address over the time horizon 
of the project.

52

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Going beyond carbon

Key SDGs

Overview
We know that our environmental impact is 
wider than carbon emissions and we 
continue to assess, address and minimise 
our environmental impacts beyond carbon. 
This year we have focused on the 
implementation of the Environmental 
Management System (EMS), improvements 
to waste management in our operations, 
and documenting sustainability 
requirements in our procurement.

We have also continued to implement our 
Diversity and Inclusion Strategy and 
incorporated Wellbeing to provide holistic 
support for people who work at easyJet.

Environmental Management 
System 
To improve our environmental performance 
in a structured, systematic, and 
documented way, we joined the IATA 
Environmental Assessment Program 
(IEnvA), an EMS accreditation programme 
specifically developed for the airline sector 
by airlines, IATA, and leading experts in the 
aviation environmental sustainability. IEnvA 
provides airlines with a guidance, aligned 
with internationally accepted environmental 
management standard ISO 14001:2015, to 
effectively address significant 
environmental sustainability matters that 
face the aviation industry today. 

We began implementation of our EMS in 
2020 and established a dedicated 
Environmental Management Review Board. 
The Board is chaired by the Chief 
Operating Officer (COO), and attendees 
include the Director of Flight Operations, 
the Director of Cabin Services, the Director 
of Inflight Retail, the Director of Engineering 
& Maintenance, the Director of Safety, 
Security & Compliance, the Director of 
Ground Operations, the Director of Airport 
Operations and Navigation, the Director of 
HR Shared Services and the Director of 
Sustainability. The Board meets twice a 
year to review the performance of the EMS 
and to ensure that it continues to be 
effective in meeting objectives and targets, 
addresses key operations and business 
activities, and provides an efficient 
framework for continual improvement. 

To implement and embed the EMS into 
day-to-day activities, a cross functional 
EMS Working Group has been created, 
which is chaired by the COO. The working 
group includes representatives from Flight 
Operations, Safety, Security & Compliance, 
Engineering & Maintenance, Property, 
Inflight Retail, Ground Operations, and Crew 
Operations. The Groups meets on a 
quarterly basis and is responsible for 
championing environmental improvement 
and delivering environmental initiatives, 
improving environmental policy and 
procedures integration in their 
departments. 15 Environmental Action 
Plans have been developed across all areas 
to maintain environmental compliance, 
prevent pollution, and drive continuous 
environmental improvement. 

Airlines are able to phase the 
implementation of the IEnvA programme 
with recognition as a Stage 1 or Stage 2 
Operator. In September 2021 we were 
internally assessed against the IEnvA Stage 
1 standards, which was followed by an 
external assessment by a team of IEnvA 
Assessors (that consists of one IOSA Lead 
Auditor and one certified ISO 14001 
auditor) . We are committed to achieve 
Stage 2 recognition in the 2022 financial 
year.

Waste management
A variety of waste streams are generated 
in our operations and we are committed to 
reducing waste across all our activities, by 
applying the waste hierarchy to reduce the 
impact of any residual waste. In our offices 
we segregate recyclable waste streams 
such as paper and cardboard, aluminium 
cans and plastics, and food waste. 

In our Engineering and Maintenance 
operations we ensure hazardous waste is 
handled appropriately and we are working 
towards increased segregation of 
hazardous and non-hazardous waste. 

We also generate waste onboard our 
flights. Approximately 50% of waste 
generated on our flights is recyclable, 
which includes plastic bottles, aluminium 
cans, cardboard, and paper, and we are 
committed to segregate and recycle as 
much as possible.

Single use plastics
We have made changes to our inflight food 
and drink products and service to help 
reduce the amount of single-use plastic 
used on our flights.

Since 2020 these changes have now 
avoided the use of over 36 million items 
of plastic.

Waste generated in easyJet 
operations (excluding on-board 
waste)

Waste type

Card
Crushed empty oil tins
Food
General commercial waste
Waste oil & fuel
Scrap metal
Wood pallets
Hazardous waste
Mixed
WEEE

Total waste

Onboard waste projection
Metric

FY21

Weight  

(by tonnes)

112.74
5.79
9.60
139.21
5.18
1.96
0.88
35.89
3.02
0.45

314.72

FY20

3.39

Total onboard waste 
(thousand tonnes)*
Waste per passenger 
(kg/pax)**

1.61

0.08

0.07

 * Total onboard cabin waste generated, 
including recycling, general waste and 
International Catering Waste, split out 
separately, is unavailable. Average generated 
waste per passenger was calculated based on 
the total waste generated from aircraft 
operations at Luton Airport, for which data is 
available, and the number of arriving 
passengers. Average waste per passengers 
was extrapolated using all passengers flown to 
estimate total waste generated onboard. 
** Average calculated based on total waste 

generated at Luton Airport and the number of 
arriving passengers. Splitting out between 
short, medium and long-haul service type is 
not available. 

Onboard waste 
We are not directly responsible for the 
disposal of onboard waste, which is 
typically handled by our ground handling 
and cleaning contractors. Waste is taken  
to appropriate disposal facilities at airports, 
with some materials being recovered for 
recycling and some being sent to landfill or 
incinerated. The interpretation and 
enforcement of International Catering 
Waste (ICW) legislation at both the local 
airport and national policy level often 
means that all waste generated onboard is 
deemed as ICW upon arrival, meaning that 
materials are being unnecessarily sent to 
incineration or deep landfill, when they 
could be recycled. Consequently, many 
airports do not provide recycling facilities. 

www.easyJet.com

53

STRATEGIC REPORT SUSTAINABILITY  (CONTINUED)

Our new pilot and cabin crew 
uniforms are produced using 
fabric made from 100% 
recycled plastic bottles. The 
material for each uniform 
uses around 45 bottles.

elasticity, a four-way stretch, improving 
fit and freedom of movement for 
enhanced comfort and durability. 
This development can lead to it being 
long lasting for the wearer, reducing the 
need for more uniform items to be 
produced in the long term.

Beyond the new fabric, plastic has also 
been replaced in all clothing-related 
packaging in favour of recyclable and 
biodegradable materials.

Going paperless
Our Engineering and Maintenance Part 145 
Quality Department significantly reduced 
the need to print and re-scan documents in 
order to support easyJet engineers with 
their personal aircraft maintenance 
licence applications. 

A new procedure was introduced, which 
was approved by the CAA, reducing the 
need to print all application documentation, 
including supporting information such 
certificates, logbooks and identification 
documents and to perform application 
verification by applying a wet stamp on 
every page and countersigning it. 

Over the last year we initiated dialogue with 
our partners at our 12 largest airports to 
drive improvements in waste segregation 
and increasing recycling rates. In 
partnership with Bristol Airport, a recycling 
trial was set up in December 2020 and a 
new dedicated waste facilities were made 
available for our segregated onboard waste 
(in December 2020). The airport authority 
provides regular feedback, which is 
communicated back to our cabin crew, to 
ensure onboard waste is segregated and 
disposed of responsibly, and in line with our 
Environment Policy. 

We issue regular communications to our 
cabin crew community to emphasise the 
importance of waste segregation and a 
new training module was created, 
explaining segregation procedures and 
what happens to recyclable waste once it 
is taken off the aircraft. This module will be 
used in all cabin crew new entrants and 
recurrent training. 

Hazardous waste
Hazardous and non-hazardous waste is 
generated in our Engineering & 
Maintenance operations. We are 
committed to ensuring all waste is handled 
in a responsible manner and as much 
waste as possible is segregated. 

Cardboard is re-used for transporting 
engineering parts, both in the main hub 
and in outstations, and cleaning clothes are 
made from recycled clothing materials. 

Over the next year we will be working 
further to align the waste procedures 
and standards across all locations, and 
we will be setting reduction and 
improvement targets.

In the 2021 financial year, we began 
discussions with the Aircraft Interior 
Recycling Association (AIRA) – a total 
aircraft interior support company that 
provides environmentally responsible ways 
to recycle end of life interiors and waste 
materials. AIRA will review disposal options 
for end of life aircraft interior materials and 
plastic parts, with the view to establish 
which parts and materials can be 
processed and recycled if collected 
separately, rather than being disposed to 
landfill. We will be running a trial project 
starting early 2022. 

Recycled uniforms
This year we started introducing a new 
cabin crew and pilot uniform created with 
unique high-tech material, each made from 
around 45 recycled plastic bottles. The 
roll-out across the airline is estimated to 
prevent around half a million plastic bottles 
from ending up as plastic waste each year.

The new fabric, adapted to the easyJet’s 
current style, was first trialled last year for 
suitability in the cabin and flight deck 
environments. Compared to the non-
recycled alternative, it is more abrasion-
resistant. It also provides even more 

54 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

On a single application this could have 
previously amounted to between 300 to 
600 pages. This has not only significantly 
reduced the need to print but also 
improved processing efficiency and time. 
There is now a review of further processes 
to streamline engineering station 
procedures to move towards paperless 
systems with only a paper back-up as 
required by the regulator. 

Aircraft noise
The noise from our aircraft can affect 
those who live near airports or under flight 
paths. We work with individual airports and 
air traffic control teams to implement noise 
mitigation activities that best fit each 
location. Our pilots also use flying 
techniques that reduce the impact of 
aircraft noise, such as continuous 
descent approaches.

The new generation Airbus A320neo and 
A321neo aircraft are 50% quieter during 
takeoff and landing than the equivalent 
previous generation aircraft. The LEAP-1A 
engines on these aircraft meet the most 
stringent noise standards, ICAO’s Chapter 
14 regulations.

We have also carried out a retrofit 
programme to address a sound, associated 
with A320 family aircraft of all airlines, due 
to the airflow under the wing.

Sustainable construction – Berlin 
new hangar
In September 2021 construction began of 
our new maintenance hangar at Berlin 
Brandenberg Airport. The hangar, which 
will be our first maintenance hangar outside 
of the UK, is due to be operational at the 
end of 2023.

“Delivering Covid-19 vaccines around the world is the biggest 
health and logistics operation in history, but easyJet’s summer 
collection has provided vital support for our appeal. Once 
again, easyJet employees have gone above and beyond with 
their fundraising efforts, raising over £275,000 an incredible 
amount which could help to deliver approximately 189,000 
vaccines around the world. Thank you to everyone at easyJet, 
we’re incredibly grateful for your support.”
Gordon Glick
Deputy Executive Director for Partnerships at The UK Committee for 
Unicef (Unicef UK)

The hangar will conform with latest 
November 2020 GEG Law 
(Gebäudeenergiegesetz) and thereby 
meets the EU Energy Performance 
Directive 2020.

The plans include a highly energy efficient 
underfloor heating system, with heating 
supplied from a district heat system.

Unicef charity partnership
We have a pan-European charity 
partnership, Change for Good, with Unicef, 
the world’s leading children’s organisation. 
Our cabin crew make onboard appeals for 
customers to make donations in support of 
Unicef’s work to protect children around 
the world from disease and keep them safe 
during emergencies.

In summer 2021 we restarted our onboard 
appeals for Unicef to support the charity’s 
Covid-19 Vaccines Appeal, in which Unicef 
aims to support the delivery of 2 billion 

Covid-19 vaccines, tests, and treatments for 
health workers and the most high-risk 
people around the world. An individual 
donation from a customer of just £2/€2 
could help Unicef deliver one dose of one 
of the Covid-19 vaccines.

For the first time we took donations by 
card payment, rather than cash. We also 
encouraged customers to donate online 
directly to Unicef through prompts in the 
easyJet mobile app and through 
advertising on aircraft seatbacks.

During the summer 2021 appeal, which 
took place through July, August and 
September, we were able to raised over 
£275,000 due to the efforts of our cabin 
crew and the generosity of our customers. 

Since our partnership with Unicef began in 
2012 it has raised over £15 million. 

Our summer 2021 onboard 
charity appeal supported 
Unicef’s Covid-19 Vaccines 
Appeal and raised over 
£275,000.

www.easyJet.com

55

STRATEGIC REPORT SUSTAINABILITY  (CONTINUED)

Diversity, Inclusion and Wellbeing

This year we have continued to focus on 
our people priorities, including the ongoing 
impact of the pandemic on people who 
work at easyJet. We have evaluated our 
previously introduced Diversity and 
Inclusion Strategy and incorporated 
Wellbeing to provide a holistic strategy. It is 
focused on creating an environment of 
inclusion where everyone can be 
themselves and people can look after their 
own and each other’s wellbeing.

Firm foundations
Data led design of best practice policy and 
process, embedding our responsibility for 
inclusion and wellness at easyJet

•  Our overall engagement through our 
anonymous listening platform, with 
regular surveys, encourages our 
colleagues to score ‘I feel I can be myself 
at easyJet’ and ‘easyJet cares about my 
health and wellbeing’. The reporting 
includes verbatim comments and is 
broken by function to help us identify 
opportunities to continue improving and 
ensure every team has an inclusive 
environment. A survey we conducted in 
June 2021 showed a 7% increase to 
score 8/10 for these subjects, which, in 
the context of the impact of the 
pandemic, is a very positive outcome.
•  Our submissions for our UK Gender Pay 
Gap and the final year of the Hampton-
Alexander report (on female 
representation in senior roles) were 
skewed this year given the organisational 
changes and the implementation of 
furlough as a result of the pandemic. Our 
performance for Gender Pay Gap was a 
median gap of 12% and a mean gap of 
7.4%. The submission can be found on 
our website at https://corporate.easyjet.
com/corporate-responsibility/gender-
pay-reports. For the Hampton-Alexander 
report submission in November 2020, 
our AMB representation remained on 
target at 33%, while our AMB direct 
reports fell by 9 percentage points to 
29% due to the consequences of the 
organisational changes during the 
pandemic.

•  As part of our commitment to Diversity 

and Inclusion, we treat every applicant in 
our recruitment processes equally, 
including those with accessibility 
requirements. We also support our 
employees who experience difficulties or 
disability once in our employment, such 
as providing reasonable adjustments to 
the workplace to support everyone in 
achieving their potential. However, for 
our two largest communities, pilots and 
cabin crews, there are a range of 
regulatory requirements on ability which 
all applicants and employees must 
comply for operational safety reasons.

Gender
Gender makeup of easyJet employees as 
at 30 September 2021

plc Board

30% (3)

70% (7)

Airline Management Board1

33% (3)

67% (6)

Senior Managers2

26% (11)

74% (32)

All Employees

41% (5640)

59% (7992)

Female

Male

1.  The Airline Management Board is our “Executive 
Committee” for the purposes of the FTSE 
Women Leaders/Hampton-Alexander review
2.  Defined in accordance with the Companies 

Act 2006 which includes those with 
responsibility for planning, directing or 
controlling the activities of the company as 
well as persons who were Directors of our 
subsidiary undertakings

Open and honest communication 
Engaging campaigns and supporting 
materials, designed utilising feedback from 
our listening channels, articulating what we 
mean by inclusion and wellness at easyJet 

•  Our central framework for all 

conversations, named ‘You Matter’, sets 
a consistent approach in conversations 
on Diversity, Inclusion and Wellbeing and 
links directly to our core business ‘People 
Priority’. Our Hub and our chat forum 
encourages everyone to get involved 
and share stories and activities across 
the business. This has seen a 15% growth 
in engagement this year.

•  Our regular campaign plans recognise 
and educate on a variety of events. 
For example, recognising International 
Day of Transgender Visibility by sharing 
educational guides on the importance of 
pronouns for an inclusive environment, 
and launching our diversity data 
monitoring campaign ‘Care to Share’, 
whilst celebrating Black History Month.
•  Our Trailblazer Community, who are our 

passionate advocates for all things 
diversity, inclusion and wellbeing, are a 
single group of allies who help spread 
the word and educate on all activity 
across easyJet. Our Trailblazer 
conference this year included 
educational experience by working with 
our external specialist partners; 
recognising we have lots we can learn 
we have engaged with specialists to help 
educate us, inform our process and 
policies and being a critical friend to 

help us improve.

56 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Increasing confidence 
and capability
We upskill our people to instigate cultural 
change, creating an employee sense of 
belonging, an environment of inclusion and 
supporting wellness needs at easyJet 

•  We have delivered a variety of learning 
interventions across the business this 
year, specifically on elements of health 
and wellbeing in the pandemic time 
supported by our Employee Assistance 
Programme (EAP) partner for clinical 
expertise, ensuring our colleagues are 
aware of the support available for 
themselves and their families through 
these difficult times. We have also 
evaluated mental health learning for 
our colleagues and managers and are in 
the process of rolling this out.

•  Our inclusive behaviours e-learning and 
our mandatory diversity, equality and 
inclusion training continues to be 
available for all colleagues across  
the business. 

Supporting services  
and partners
We focus on expert input and support for 
our resources, tools and services. Reflecting 
the different needs across our communities 

•  We have worked closely with Business in 

the Community to help us with our 
commitment to the Race at Work 
Charter. This year we have improved our 
capability to collect diversity data in an 
inclusive manner and encourage our 
colleagues to ‘Care to Share’ their 
personal information where legally 
reasonable across the network. Our 
aspiration is to reach 70% declaration 
rate in the coming year across all our 
new fields.

•  We produced our Transitioning at 
easyJet Toolkit along with other 
guidance into other key policy 
documents and communication 
campaigns.

•  In the UK Glassdoor platform our 

Diversity & Inclusion rating has increased 
in the last year from 3.4 to 4.2, scored 
out of 5. Additionally, for the second 
year running we were rated first in the 
Transport sector for Britain’s Most 
Admired Companies, including the 
Diversity and Inclusion category. 

Our future focus is to continue to ensure 
our diversity monitoring enables us to make 
the right decisions for our communities and 
embed our commitments around policy, 

Business ethics

Ethical supply chain management 
Our Supplier Code of Conduct is based on 
easyJet’s Code of Business Ethics and 
requires partners to comply with easyJet 
societal and environmental standards, and 
to ensure the compliance of any sub-
contractors. In line with the UK Modern 
Slavery Act, it prohibits modern slavery and 
human trafficking.

easyJet holidays also encourages all its 
direct hotel partners to actively work 
towards certification that meets the Global 
Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) 
standards. Hotels with GSTC-recognised 
certifications have been independently 
certified against GSTC criteria which 
address the key elements of social, 
environmental, cultural, and economic 
sustainability. easyJet’s Sustainability 
Director, Jane Ashton, is also a member of 
the GSTC Board.

Modern slavery
Our Modern Slavery Working Group is 
responsible for the development and 
implementation of our modern slavery 
strategy. The Working Group was 
established in 2016 and is composed of 
senior management representatives from 
relevant functions across the business. 
It continues to monitor and assess the 
effectiveness of the steps we are taking in 
addressing modern slavery.

The human rights and modern slavery 
clauses in our Supplier Code of Conduct 
policy specifically require suppliers to 
respect internationally recognised human 
rights, including those expressed in the 
United Nations International Bill of Human 
Rights, and the internationally recognised 
rights and principles set out in the 
International Labour Organization’s Core 
Conventions and Declaration on 
Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. 
Our suppliers are also required to have at 
all times a written policy in relation to such 
matters and to ensure the policy’s effective 
implementation within their organisation.

More information is available in our latest 
Modern Slavery Act statement at https://
corporate.easyjet.com/.

process and upskilling. As well as a 
continued commitment to broadening the 
health and wellbeing support across our 
network, our Trailblazer team and line 
managers continue to be critical in our 
ambition to create an inclusive and 
energising environment where everyone 
can learn and grow.

Although the aviation industry is not 
predicted to reach previous levels of 
demand until at least 2024, which  
means we will not be recruiting in the  
same numbers as pre-pandemic, we are 
committed to looking at the best ways we 
can make the pipeline of future aviation 
talent more diverse.

Virtual pilot school visits
In March 2021 we launched a virtual pilot 
school visits programme. Teachers, schools 
and parents have been able to request a 
virtual visit from an easyJet pilot, to join 
classrooms and assemblies via video link, 
providing young people across the UK with 
the opportunity to find out what the job of 
a pilot is really like and to explain that it can 
be a career that anyone can consider.

Since 2017 easyJet pilots have visited over 
400 schools and colleges across Europe, 
which has helped to provide visible role 
models for young people.

Special assistance
We provide our special assistance service, 
in partnership with airports and their special 
assistance providers on the ground, for 
customers who need some additional help 
when they are travelling.

Customer satisfaction amongst passengers 
using special assistance has continued to 
be higher than the average across all 
customers. Customer satisfaction amongst 
special assistance customers this financial 
year was 87% (based on customers who 
selected ‘completely’, ‘very’ or ‘quite’ 
satisfied), compared to 74.6% for all 
customers (2020: 83.6% for customers 
using special assistance, compared to 
75.2% for all customers).

In 2012 we established the easyJet Special 
Assistance Advisory Group (ESAAG), to 
provide expert advice on special 
assistance issues. While the Group has not 
met during the pandemic, we continue to 
work with the Chair of the Group, Lord 
David Blunkett.

Human trafficking
All airlines and transport providers are at 
risk that their services could be used by 
human traffickers. We have training for all 
our cabin crew and pilots on how to 
identify and report possible human 
trafficking. 

Ethics policies and oversight
We have in place ethical and compliance 
policies, covering topics including bribery 
and corruption, gift giving, anti-fraud, 
human rights and modern slavery.  
These policies and our commitment to the 
Human Rights statement are available to  
all employees on the easyJet intranet.

All new entrants to easyJet receive 
mandatory ethics training during the 
onboarding process. All employees are  
also required to complete annual online 
refresher training covering ethical 
behaviour, anti-bribery and corruption.

A Business Integrity Committee acts as a 
cross-company forum to consider ethics 
policies and management and this has 
continued to meet this year. The 
committee receives reports of suspected 
unethical behaviour, identifies Group-wide 
trends, and monitors follow up. The 
committee’s remit includes disciplinary 
issues or grievances raised with HR, 
environmental concerns and 
suspected fraud.

Whistleblowing
All employees of easyJet and our suppliers 
should feel able to raise concerns about 
any safety, legal or ethical issues. If they 
feel unable to report these concerns to a 
manager, we also provide a confidential 
whistleblowing process.

The ‘Speak Up, Speak Out’ service is run 
independently of easyJet and reports can 
be made openly or anonymously. The 
service is available by phone and online 
reporting in all countries we serve. 

All reports are investigated and followed up 
as necessary by a dedicated easyJet senior 
manager responsible for business integrity. 
The Board oversees the whistleblowing 
process with the assistance of the Audit 
Committee. In addition, the Business 
Integrity Committee is a management 
forum on whistleblowing. It receives 
summaries of all reported concerns  
and monitors any ongoing concerns and 
ensures that the proposed outcomes of 
investigations are fair, transparent and 
robust, with root causes identified and 
remedial actions agreed.

www.easyJet.com

57

STRATEGIC REPORT SUSTAINABILITY  (CONTINUED)

Task force on Climate-related  
Financial Disclosures

Governance

(a) Describe the board’s oversight of 
climate-related risks and 
opportunities
Climate-related issues are addressed on a 
regular basis by the Airline Management 
Board (AMB), the equivalent of an 
Executive Committee (ExCo) that is led 
by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). 
The AMB reports upwards to the plc Board. 
The CEO sits on the plc Board and is 
responsible for climate-related issues.

The AMB’s members (which includes the 
CFO & CEO) are collectively responsible for 
assessing and managing climate-related 
risks and opportunities, as well as driving 
the performance of the airline against 
strategic KPIs and managing the allocation 
of central funds and capital.

(b) Describe management’s role in 
assessing and managing climate-
related risks and opportunities
Climate-related issues were included as 
specific agenda items four times at the 
AMB, and were discussed regularly at the 
plc Board during the 2021 financial year. 
This included regular updates from the 
CEO, and a formal presentation from the 

Strategy

(a) Describe the climate-related risks 
and opportunities the organisation 
has identified over the short, 
medium and long term
Ongoing development of the Corporate 
Risk Management Framework is a constant 
at easyJet, ensuring a unified and 
collaborative risk management approach 
and risk management best practice across 
the Group. easyJet defines our short, 
medium and long term time horizons for 
climate risk as follows:

•  short – 0-1 year
•  medium – 1-5 years
•  long – 5-20 years

The key risks identified using the risk 
framework by the business and 
subsequently reviewed by the Board fall 
into seven broad themes – one of these 
thematic areas is environment and 

sustainability team. Topics usually covered 
reviewing and guiding climate-related 
strategy and monitoring and overseeing 
progress against goals and targets for 
addressing climate-related issues, 
among others.

easyJet has a dedicated sustainability 
board called the Sustainability Steering 
Committee. The Committee meets on 
average, eight to ten times a year and 
comprises senior management attendees 
including Group Markets & Marketing 
Director, CFO, Chief Commercial Officer, 
Group General Counsel & Company 
Secretary, Director of Flight Operations, 
Director of Airport Development & 
Procurement, Director of Tax & Fuel 
Procurement, HR & People Development 
Director and the Director of Sustainability. 
Members are collectively responsible for 
driving the performance of the airline 
against strategic KPIs and managing the 
allocation of central funds and resource 
to improve our performance and the 
consideration of and disclosure of 
climate-related risks and opportunities.

During the 2021 financial year, the 
Sustainability Steering Committee 

(chaired by the Group Markets & Marketing 
Director, AMB member) reviewed and 
discussed climate-related risks and 
opportunities from both a qualitative and 
quantitative perspective and these were 
presented and discussed upwards to the 
AMB. The Group Markets & Marketing 
Director, in their capacity as Chair of the 
Sustainability Steering Committee, 
approved the task to model the future 
trajectory of gCO2/revenue per passenger 
kilometre (RPK) for the airline through to 
2050 (a task that feeds into the modelling 
of our net zero ambitions).

Refer to the section below on Metrics and 
targets for further information regarding 
our net zero pathway.

Focus areas for the 2022 
financial year 
•  easyJet is planning further 

engagement and involvement of 
Board-level colleagues and managers 
across the business to increase the 
visibility, knowledge and performance 
of climate change issues. This will 
include a series of risk workshops to 
assign further responsibilities.

sustainability as outlined in the risk section 
on page 85. The risks include:

part of the Safety, Security and Operations 
thematic area. 

Carbon trading schemes – i.e. adverse 
changes to these schemes including the 
existence and/or cost of the scheme (i.e. 
pertaining to a climate transition risk).

Increased taxation – i.e. future policy 
measures and regulation to tackle the 
impact of aviation on climate change could 
impact easyJet’s business if they impose 
limitations and cost on how easyJet 
operates and the services it can provide 
(i.e. pertaining to a climate transition risk).

Significant operational disruption – in the 
2021 financial year, we incorporated the 
impacts of climate change on our business 
and operations into a risk focused on 
significant operational disruption – i.e. 
climate change-related weather disruption 
(i.e. pertaining to physical climate risks) as 

easyJet worked in partnership with the 
Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies (CCRS) 
using methodology and scenarios from 
their Climate Resilience Analytics 
Framework. The scope of work included 
addressing the business risk from climate 
change in both our direct and indirect 
operations, across our value chain. The 
work commenced in the early part of the 
2021 financial year whereby an assessment 
was made, using workshops and interviews 
with key internal stakeholders, regarding 
the potential financial risks to our business 
operations across the dimensions of 
physical and transition risks. CCRS then 
undertook scenario modelling of each 
climate risk against easyJet’s current 
commercial and physical footprint (see 
below for more information).  

58 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

CCRS modelled the potential financial 
impacts of transition risks (e.g. the 
changing landscape of climate and carbon 
taxes, charges and regulatory changes 
introduced by countries in our network) as 
well as physical risks (see below) for various 
climate scenarios to determine the 
sensitivity of impacts to different future 
global socioeconomic and temperature 
projections (see below for a full explanation 
of the scenarios used). easyJet relies on a 
number of key estimates including the 
ability to meet its strategic plans, future 
fuel and carbon tax prices and the ability  
to pass on cost price increases to 
the customer.

Transition risks
There are several transition risks that are 
prominent, as easyJet develops its business 
and operations in a changing landscape. 
They include:

•  Changes in Consumer Sentiment
•  Legislation and Policy Changes (e.g. 

future climate and carbon-related taxes)

•  Technology Developments (including 

Sustainable Aviation Fuels and 
aircraft innovation)

•  Investor Sentiment and the increase 

of the ESG Agenda

•  Consumer and/or Regulator 

Liability Claim

Physical risks
The CCRS work highlighted the acute 
and chronic physical risks that could 
impact our business. In summary, these 
related to the increased impact to our 
business from severe weather like 
flooding, snowstorms etc. 

Opportunities
The specific opportunities easyJet has 
identified include:

•  resource efficiency, i.e. the use of more 
efficient aircraft which help to reduce 
our fuel burn, carbon compliance and 
other direct costs

•  shift in consumer preferences – this 

(b) – Describe the impact of climate-
related risks and opportunities on 
the organisation’s business, strategy 
and financial planning
In terms of financial planning, easyJet 
defined what it deemed to be substantive 
financial or strategic impact on our 
business during the 2021 financial year with 
respect to the climate change risk 
quantification. The quantification will further 
assist in defining thresholds for what 
constitutes a risk of “major concern” e.g. 
substantive financial or strategic level of 
impact and “above risk tolerance” against 
this metric – the overall company 
materiality principal of 1% of total assets 
equating to a threshold of £21.5m is listed 
in this annual report. 

For a full explanation of this materiality 
threshold in the context of risk 
quantification, refer to section 2.1b and for 
a full explanation of our climate-related 
risks and opportunities on our business and 
strategy, please refer to section 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 
& 2.4 of our 2021 CDP climate change 
submission which is available on the CDP 
website at www.cdp.net. 

(c) Describe the resilience of the 
organisation’s strategy, taking into 
consideration different climate-
related scenarios, including a 
2°C or lower scenario
Overview of scenario analysis
CCRS quantified our climate change risks 
using a 5-year Enterprise Value at Risk 
(5yrEV@Risk) metric which shows how the 
risks would impact discounted cashflows 
over five years within a given confidence 
interval, e.g. 95%, in line with how we define 
short and medium term time horizons for 
climate risks. However, the quantification 
and supporting research and analysis will 
further assist in the allocation of resource 
and capital to manage these risks beyond 
these time horizons.

The scenarios used were as follows:

could allow easyJet to build brand loyalty 
by demonstrating our commitment to 
reduce emissions and tackling climate 
change

•  Current Policy (climate-related policies 
that governments have in place today, 
resulting in >3°C temperature rise by 
2100)

•  reducing future direct costs by 

supporting technological step change 
– we recognise the need for our industry 
to transition to a low-carbon operation 
which is why we are collaborating in 
several partnerships to support 
technological step change to make zero 
emissions technology a reality – whether 
hydrogen, electric or a hybrid of these 
technologies to power the aircraft of 
the future.

•  Stated Policy (policies that governments 
have committed to in their Nationally 
Determined Contributions but are not 
yet implemented and fall short of Paris 
Agreement requirements, 2.5°C)
•  Paris Agreement-aligned mitigation 

(2°C); and 

•  Paris Ambition (radical policy action to 

Net Zero by 2050, 1.5°C). 

These scenarios incorporate socioeconomic 
projections from the Shared 
Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs).

To assess physical risk, the changes in 
expected annual impacts (in terms of 
likelihood and severity of extreme weather 
events) were analysed on a 20-year time 
horizon (2040) relative to the present day 
(recent historical period) through financial 
models. Individual risk scenarios were 
modelled to assess the various mechanisms 
through which physical hazards (e.g. 
extreme temperatures, water stress, floods, 
and storms) impacts easyJet, including 
disruption to operations and to market 
demand. A middle-of-the-road scenario 
was chosen – Representative 
Concentration Pathway (RCP4.5) – noting 
that there is limited variability in physical 
risks across different RCPs within the near 
to mid-term time horizon (20 years). 

The CCRS risk analysis confirmed and 
elaborated on the summary of risks that 
management had outlined in our 2020 
financial year Annual Report and CCRS 
specifically quantified the financial value at 
risk over a five-year time horizon across 
various global emission pathways. Financial 
modelling enabled assessment of the 
magnitude of individual transition and 
physical risks identified and the relative 
materiality of these different climate risks 
over the same time horizon. For example, 
across the transition risk dimensions of 
policy, market, technology, reputational, 
and liability risk, as well as acute and 
chronic physical risks.

To read the full suite of cost estimates 
associated with the risks and opportunities, 
refer to section 2.3 and 2.4 of our 2021 
CDP submission. Outputs from the various 
scenario analyses modelled by CCRS 
included within the quantitative 
assessments of the financial impacts to 
easyJet can be reviewed in detail in section 
3.2a of our 2021 CDP submission. Further 
information is contained in Notes to the 
accounts, 1b.(ii) Critical accounting 
estimates on pages 184 to 185.

Focus areas for the 2022 
financial year
•  Regular involvement from Corporate 
Risk and easyJet’s Sustainability team 
will ensure progress is maintained and 
risks are managed within easyJet’s 
Corporate Risk Framework.

•  easyJet will closely track the outputs 
from COP26 including any latest 
developments regarding climate 
scenarios and will review these in the 
context of having joined Race to 
Zero, a global UN-backed campaign 
to achieve net zero carbon emissions 
by 2050.

•  easyJet plans to present its net zero 
roadmap in the 2022 financial year.

www.easyJet.com

59

STRATEGIC REPORT Focus areas for the 2022 
financial year
•  easyJet will be engaging with senior 
managers across the business to 
create and embed action plans to 
address priority climate-related risks 
and opportunities and implement key 
controls and mitigation strategies. 
•  Regular involvement from Corporate 

Risk and easyJet’s Sustainability 
teams will help ensure progress is 
maintained and risks are managed 
within easyJet’s Corporate Risk 
Framework.

SUSTAINABILITY  (CONTINUED)

Risk management

(a) Describe the organisation’s 
processes for identifying and 
assessing climate-related risks 
and opportunities
easyJet conducted a risk quantification 
exercise within a new risk framework to 
stress test our corporate risk register in the 
2021 financial year – which included risks 
arising from climate change. easyJet 
worked in partnership with the Cambridge 
Centre for Risk Studies and used a “5-year 
Earnings Value at Risk (5yrEV@Risk)” metric 
which shows how the risks would impact 
discounted cashflows over five years within 
a given confidence interval, e.g. 95%.

For further information on easyJet’s 
management of sustainability risks, see the 
Risk section on page 85.

(b) Describe the organisation’s 
processes for managing climate-
related risks and opportunities; and

(c) Describe how processes for 
identifying, assessing and managing 
climate-related risks are 
incorporated into the business 
overall risk management.
An effective corporate risk management 
framework has a simple, yet effective 
methodology. This helps encourage 
engagement at, and across, appropriate 
levels of the organisation. The methodology 
at the heart of the new corporate risk 
management framework is what is 
commonly known as the “bow tie” 
approach. This encourages a range of 
internal stakeholders (e.g. risk, strategy and 
finance teams) to consider risk in a 
structured and consistent way, with the 
unwanted or unexpected event at the 
centre. The risk bow ties are reviewed on a 
regular basis to ensure stakeholders are 

aware of the current causes and 
consequences, and that the most 
appropriate controls are in place and being 
effective. Potential causes and 
consequences of this event are then 
identified together with an assessment of 
the controls and mitigations that may 
reduce the likelihood or impact of the 
unwanted or unexpected event with a 
specific focus on prioritising those risks with 
a material financial impact.

easyJet will next review each transition risk 
identified in conjunction with the current 
climate change risks detailed in our 
Principal Risks section (see page 78). 
The action is to determine individual 
strategies and assign risk ownership 
through the Corporate Risk Framework. 
The Board is ultimately responsible for 
determining the nature and extent of the 
principal risks. However, in similar fashion 
to the current physical climate change 
risks, ownership of these risks and their risk 
management controls and capabilities sit 
across the Group. This is in addition to 
discussion of key risk topics and events, 
including emerging or changing risks, at 
the Airline Management Board, Audit 
Committee and plc Board.

For a full explanation regarding our 
approach and processes to manage 
climate-related risks and opportunities, 
please refer to section 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4 of 
our 2021 CDP climate change submission 
which is available on the CDP website at 
www.cdp.net. 

60 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Focus areas for the 2022 
financial year
•  The business will commence 

programmes of work to move it 
towards a pathway of net zero 
carbon emissions by 2050 and 
easyJet plans to present its net zero 
roadmap in the 2022 financial year.

Metrics and targets

(a) Disclose the metrics used by the 
organisation to assess the climate-
related risks and opportunities in line 
with its strategy and risk 
management process
easyJet worked in partnership with the 
Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies (CCRS) 
to model the potential financial impacts 
from various climate-related scenarios – 
five in total – to determine the different 
temperature increases according to e.g. 
Paris aligned reductions, BAU projections 
etc. Results of the analysis are quantitative 
assessments of financial impacts to 
easyJet for each of the risk scenarios, 
across various emissions pathways. For 
further information about the metrics used 
for the financial quantification of our 
climate-related risks and opportunities, 
please refer to section 2.3 & 2.4 of our 
2021 CDP climate change submission 
which is available on the CDP website 
at www.cdp.net. 

(b) Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and if 
appropriate, Scope 3 GHG and the 
related risks.
easyJet has disclosed its full value chain 
emissions in this Annual Report, for the 
second consecutive year. Refer to page 46 
to read our comprehensive GHG and 
Energy Performance Table, incl. Scope 1, 2 
& 3 emissions. For a full explanation of our 
GHG risks, please refer to section 2.3 of 
our 2021 CDP climate change submission 
which is available on the CDP website 
at www.cdp.net. 

(c) Describe the targets used by the 
organisation to manage climate-
related risks and opportunities and 
performance against targets
The business has an intensity (efficiency) 
target – to achieve a 10% reduction in 
carbon dioxide emissions per passenger 
kilometre on our flights by 2022, compared 
to a 2016 baseline figure – i.e. the end of 
next financial year. This metric, using grams 
of carbon dioxide per revenue passenger 
km is a headline KPI for the business and 
an important yardstick of our on-going 
efficiency improvements. The impact of 
the Covid-19 pandemic, including aircraft 
deferrals and reduced load factors, has 
significantly affected our progress towards 
our 10% efficiency target and currently we 
do not expect to meet this planned 
reduction in 2022. 

In November 2021 easyJet joined Race to 
Zero, a global UN-backed campaign to 
achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050 
at the latest. By joining Race to Zero, we 
have committed to set an interim science-
based target for 2035 as well as to reach 
net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, 
aligning with the criteria and 
recommendations of the Science 
Based Targets initiative (SBTi). easyJet 
plans to present its net-zero roadmap 
in the 2022 financial year.

Report footnote: The Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies Climate Resilience Analytics Framework is used by global companies to facilitate strategic and 
financial decision making from climate change. The Centre’s rigorous scenario-based framework integrates a wide range of threat classes including financial, 
geopolitical, technology, environmental, social and governance with the latest international standards in climate science to provide a competitive view of a 
corporation’s balance sheet. The Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies is based within the University of Cambridge Judge Business School. The Centre works 
closely with business partners in tackling complex issues of management science in risk.

www.easyJet.com

61

STRATEGIC REPORT NON- FINANCI AL INFORMATION  ST ATE ME NT

Non-financial 
information statement

The table below and the information incorporated by reference comprises our Non-Financial Information Statement required by s414CA 
and 414CB of the Companies Act 2006. Details of our business model can be found on page 12.

Related principal risks and  
impact of business activity 
•  The impacts of climate 
change on our business 
and operations, carbon 
credit programmes, 
regulation, taxation and 
changing customer and 
employee expectations 
are recognised as one of 
easyJet’s principal risks. 
Refer to pages 79 and 
85 to 86 for a detailed 
view of our environmental 
and sustainability risks.
•  During the year we have 
worked in partnership 
with the Cambridge 
Centre of Risk Studies 
(CCRS) to identify the 
business risks from 
climate change in both 
our direct and indirect 
operations. More 
information on CCRS 
Scenario Analysis are 
included in our TCFD 
report on pages 58 to 61.

Policies

1. Environmental matters
•  Our Group-wide 

Sustainability Strategy is 
to lead and challenge 
global aviation towards 
net zero emissions while 
positively impacting our 
communities and our 
people, recognising the 
need to transition to a low 
carbon economy and the 
need for aviation to play 
its part.

•  Our Environment Policy 

sets out our approach to 
managing and minimising 
our environmental impact.

•  easyJet holidays offsets 

the carbon emissions from 
its package holidays and 
launched its inaugural 
Sustainability Strategy 
during the year. This 
includes a commitment 
that all of its holidays 
would directly support 
sustainable practices by 
the end of 2025 and 
encouraging 100% of its 
contracted hotels to 
achieve certification by a 
Global Sustainable 
Tourism Council (GSTC) 
accredited certification 
body or a certification to a 
GSTC recognised 
standard by the end of 
2025.

•  Our Supplier Code of 

Conduct requires partners 
to comply with a number 
of environmental 
standards. 

Due diligence and implementation
•  The Sustainability Steering 
Committee monitors the 
progress being made against 
the Group-wide Sustainability 
Strategy. The plc Board and 
AMB regularly discuss climate- 
related matters and oversee 
progress against goals and 
targets for addressing climate-
related issues. For more 
information on our Sustainability 
Strategy and how we manage 
sustainability, please refer to 
pages 38 to 61.

•  During the year we have 

implemented an Environmental 
Management System (EMS) to 
manage and improve our 
environmental performance in a 
systematic way. The EMS 
implementation is internally and 
externally audited. The external 
audit is done against the IEnvA 
program requirements, which is 
aligned to international 
standard ISO 14001. The internal 
audit is carried out by both the 
easyJet Compliance Team and 
by a team of IEnvA Assessors 
(consisting of one IOSA Lead 
Auditor and one certified ISO 
14001 Auditor).

•  Progress against environmental 
targets is reported to the AMB 
at regular intervals. The 
Environment Policy is available 
at https://corporate.easyjet.com/

•  easyJet holidays Sustainability 

Strategy is managed and 
implemented by a formal 
easyJet holidays Sustainability 
Committee, which holds 
monthly meetings and 
objectives to monitor the 
progress and delivery of 
the Strategy.

Outcomes of policies and  
related KPIs (where applicable)
•  As part of our commitment to UK 

and EU targets of net zero 
emissions by 2050, we have 
helped develop a European 
aviation industry roadmap towards 
net zero (“Destination 2050”).
•  We supported and engaged on 

the EU’s ‘Fit for 55’ policy 
framework to achieve a 55% 
reduction in carbon emissions by 
2030 and net zero emissions by 
2050. We agree that delivering on 
climate change is the most 
important long term challenge for 
aviation and therefore it is critical 
that any fiscal measures applied to 
aviation support this aim.
•  We are developing our own 

detailed pathway to net zero. As 
part of our decarbonisation 
pathway, we have partnered with 
Gatwick Airport to trial the use of 
Sustainable Aviation Fuels for a 
number of flights.

•  easyJet holidays became the first 
major UK tour operator to offset 
the carbon emissions directly 
associated with its package 
holidays. For more information 
refer to page 49.

•  We have adopted the 

recommendations of the 
Task Force on Climate-related 
Financial Disclosures (TCFD) to 
improve our stakeholders’ ability to 
assess climate-related risks and 
opportunities. 

•  Refer to page 46 for our 

greenhouse gas emissions data.
•  Progress against environmental 

targets, including carbon emissions 
per passenger kilometre, is 
reported on page 47.

62 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Policies

2. Employees
•  Our People Handbook and 
Code of Ethics promote a 
culture that encourages 
open lines of 
communication and free 
access to information.

•  We have a Diversity, 

Inclusion and Wellbeing 
strategy.

•  Our Equal Opportunity 

and Fair Treatment Policy 
encourages our 
employees to make the 
best use of their skills and 
experience and ensure we 
treat staff, potential staff 
and the public fairly. 

•  Our “Speak Up, Speak Out” 
whistleblowing process 
enables easyJet 
employees and suppliers 
to be able to raise 
concerns about any 
safety, ethical or legal 
issues. 

Due diligence and implementation
•  The People team are responsible 
for the majority of employee-
related policies and ensuring they 
are followed, regularly reviewed and 
refreshed. 

•  Employees are required to 

complete mandatory training on 
joining the Company and annual 
refresher training to ensure that 
they are trained and up-to-date on 
key policies.

•  We use our Employee Engagement 
Platform, Peakon, to understand 
how these policies are being 
perceived in practice and to get 
employees’ views and feedback on 
working at easyJet. 

•  Progress against diversity and 
inclusion targets is reported 
regularly to the AMB and annually 
to the plc Board’s Nominations 
Committee to ensure we have a 
workforce that reflects the diverse 
customers we serve and the 
diverse communities within 
which we operate. 

•  As part of our Diversity, Inclusion 
and Wellbeing Strategy we treat 
every applicant in our recruitment 
processes equally, including those 
with accessibility requirements. We 
also support our employees who 
experience difficulties or disability 
once in our employment.

•  Our whistleblowing processes are 
overseen by a Business Integrity 
Committee, which also identifies 
any cross-company trends. They 
are also reviewed by the Audit 
Committee and plc Board on a 
quarterly basis. 

•  The Business Integrity Committee 
acts as a cross-company forum to 
consider ethics policies. The 
Committee receives reports of 
suspected unethical behaviour, 
identifies Group-wide trends, and 
monitors follow up. The 
Committee’s remit includes 
disciplinary issues or grievances 
raised with HR, environmental 
concerns and suspected fraud.

•  The Board discusses the employee 
voice independent of management 
through the Employee 
Representative Director mechanism. 

Outcomes of policies and  
related KPIs (where applicable)
•  To ensure employees are 

Related principal risks and  
impact of business activity 
•  Our people are 

fundamental to our 
success and a key 
category of principal 
risk is around our 
people, further 
information on which 
is set out on pages 
94 and 95. Industrial 
Action and talent 
acquisition and 
retention are 
recognised as principal 
risks and we seek to 
control and mitigate 
those risks in order to 
reduce their impact. 

communicated to clearly, a weekly 
podcast was launched, 
‘VoiceNote’, where Johan 
Lundgren updates employees 
about the changing external 
environment and what 
management and the plc Board 
are doing to support them.
•  Our Diversity and Inclusion 

Strategy was revised to include 
Wellbeing, in order to provide a 
holistic strategy in the light of the 
impact from the pandemic.

•  We have developed a central “You 
Matter” framework to provide a 
suite of tools and services to help 
employees look after their own 
health and wellness, connect with 
each other and plan for the 
future. For more information on 
our Diversity, Inclusion and 
Wellbeing Strategy, please refer to 
page 56.

•  Our regular employee surveys 

help us understand how 
employees view working at 
easyJet. A survey we conducted 
in June 2021 showed a 7% 
increase in scoring on employee 
health and wellbeing. For more 
information on employee 
engagement, please refer to 
page 28.

•  As a result of the pandemic we 

adopted different ways of working 
and our hybrid approach has 
helped employees balance their 
work and family life and enabled a 
safe and phased return to work.

•  To engage with the wider 

workforce and to increase the plc 
Board’s visibility amongst 
employees, we reviewed the 
employee engagement 
mechanism in the year. For more 
details on how we enhanced the 
employee voice in the boardroom, 
please refer to page 109. 

•  As part of our refreshed ‘Speak 

Up, Speak Out’ (SUSO) 
programme, we engaged an 
external provider to offer an 
independent and confidential 
hotline to our employees, 
contractors and third-party 
suppliers if they need to raise 
any concerns.

www.easyJet.com

63

STRATEGIC REPORT NON- FINANCI AL INFORMATION  ST ATE ME NT ( CO NT I NUE D)

Due diligence and implementation
•  Our cabin crew make onboard 
appeals for customers to make 
donations in support of Unicef’s 
work to protect children around the 
world from disease and keep them 
safe during emergencies.

•  Implemented an Environment 

Management System to work in 
different ways to take action on 
sustainability, beyond our 
carbon impact.

•  The Special Assistance Advisory 
Group (ESAAG) considers and 
monitors easyJet’s special assistance 
service, including customer 
satisfaction amongst those customers 
using the service.

Policies

3. Social matters
•  easyJet has a pan-

European partnership, 
‘Change for Good’ with 
Unicef to support its work. 

•  Sustainability activities 

including carbon 
emissions, waste 
management, aircraft 
noise and recycled 
uniforms.

•  We want to support those 
customers that may need 
special assistance on 
board our aircraft.
•  As set out under 

Employees, we have a 
Diversity and Inclusion 
strategy and Equal 
Opportunity and Fair 
Treatment Policy.

Related principal risks and  
impact of business activity 
•  Social impact matters 
are not considered to 
be principal risks. 
However, these 
matters are 
considered by the plc 
Board as part of its 
stakeholder 
engagement 
programme, further 
information is set out 
on pages 26 to 37.

Outcomes of policies and  
related KPIs (where applicable)
•  Given the impact of the pandemic, 

we pivoted our appeal for 
Unicef to support its Covid-19 
Vaccines Appeal, which aims to 
support the delivery of 2 billion 
vaccines, tests and treatments 
for high risk people around 
the world.

•  We introduced new cabin crew 
and pilot uniforms made from 
recycled plastic bottles.
•  We partnered with Bristol 

Airport in a project to pilot best 
practice cabin waste separation 
and recycling, with a view to 
engaging our crews and many 
more airports to reduce cabin 
waste to landfill.

•  Customer satisfaction amongst 

passengers using special 
assistance has continued to be 
higher than the average across 
all customers. Customer 
satisfaction amongst special 
assistance customers this 
financial year was 87% (based 
on customers who selected 
‘completely’, ‘very’ or ‘quite’ 
satisfied), compared to 74.6% 
for all customers (2020: 83.6% 
for customers using special 
assistance, compared to 75.2% 
for all customers). While the 
Group has not met during the 
pandemic, we continue to work 
with the Chair of the Group, 
Lord David Blunkett. 

•  Although the aviation industry is 
not predicted to reach previous 
levels of demand until at least 
2024, which means we will not 
be recruiting in the same 
numbers as pre-pandemic, we 
are committed to looking at the 
best ways we can make the 
pipeline of future aviation talent 
more diverse. 

64 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Policies

4. Human rights
•  easyJet is committed to 
human rights, both in its 
business and its supply 
chain. This includes 
observance of the 
principles set out by the 
International Labour 
Organisation Declaration 
on Fundamental Principles 
and Rights at Work.

•  We have a Supplier Code 

of Conduct, which is 
based on easyJet’s Code 
of Business Ethics and 
requires partners to 
comply with easyJet 
societal and environmental 
standards, and to ensure 
the compliance of any 
subcontractors. In line with 
the UK Modern Slavery 
Act, it prohibits modern 
slavery and human 
trafficking. 

5.  Anti-corruption and 

anti-bribery

•  Code of Ethics, which 
includes ethical and 
compliance policies, 
covering topics that include 
bribery and corruption, gift 
giving and fraud.

•  ‘Speak Up, Speak Out’ 

policy.

•  Supplier Code of Conduct.
•  Gifts and Hospitality 

Register.

Due diligence and implementation
•  The Modern Slavery Working Group is 
responsible for the development and 
implementation of our modern slavery 
strategy. 

•  All supplier contracts include a clause 
requiring them to comply with the 
Supplier Code of Conduct and 
Modern Slavery Act. 

•  The plc Board reviews easyJet’s 
policies on modern slavery, due 
diligence processes and the way 
we assess and manage modern 
slavery annually.

•  Suppliers must submit an annual 

slavery and human trafficking report 
setting out steps taken to ensure that 
slavery and human trafficking is not 
taking place in supply chains or in any 
part of their business.

•  Employees are required to undertake 

mandatory training on modern 
slavery. 

Outcomes of policies and  
related KPIs (where applicable)
•  Both induction training and 

annual refresher training at a 
Group level ensures the workforce 
is continually mindful of human 
rights and modern slavery.

•  Ensuring policies form part of 
our process with new and 
potential suppliers in turn 
enhances the Group’s actions 
to mitigate and prevent modern 
slavery and human trafficking.
•  We consulted with a number of 
expert stakeholders, such as 
not for profit organisations and 
investors, in developing our 
strategy to tackle modern 
slavery. We shared with them 
our modern slavery policy and 
strategy and their constructive 
feedback helped us to further 
improve our approach to 
tackling the issue.

•  Ethical and compliance policies are 
monitored by the Business Integrity 
Committee and People team.
•  All existing and new employees 

receive mandatory ethics training 
annually and upon joining the 
business.

•  Risks associated with bribery and 

corruption are reviewed quarterly by 
the Audit Committee.

•  A Gifts and Hospitality Register 
ensures any gifts or hospitality 
received are recorded and monitored 
in line with regulatory requirements.

•  Ensuring appropriate controls 
are in place to monitor and 
mitigate bribery and corruption, 
both external and internal, has 
ensured a zero tolerance 
approach is maintained 
throughout the Group.
•  In order to understand 

industry-wide trends, the 
Business Integrity Committee 
set up a UK Airline Fraud Forum 
and has invited several UK 
airlines to attend.

Related principal risks and  
impact of business activity 
•  Modern slavery was 
included as a key 
topic in this year’s 
Safeguarding 
Workshop – an 
internal cross-
functional workshop 
aimed at assessing 
safeguarding risks 
faced by easyJet to 
stimulate discussion 
and prioritise any 
future management 
action.

•  We continue to look 
at the Global Slavery 
Index to support our 
analysis of geographic 
risks and assess 
whether the country/
area have a high 
prevalence of modern 
slavery or other labour 
rights violations.

•  Compliance and 

regulatory risks are 
recognised as a 
principal risk. More 
details can be found 
on pages 90 to 91.

www.easyJet.com

65

STRATEGIC REPORT FINANCIAL REVIEW

Our Financial Results

Our focus over the winter season was on raising 
liquidity, implementing strong cost control 
measures and cash generative flying to minimise 
cash burn and as we entered the Summer peak 
easyJet successfully maintained this disciplined 
approach by matching capacity to rising demand 
across UK domestics and mainland Europe. 

Kenton Jarvis
Chief Financial Officer 

Financial overview

£ million (Reported) – Group 

Group revenue
Headline costs excluding fuel, balance sheet FX and ownership costs
Fuel

Headline EBITDAR
Balance sheet foreign exchange gain
Other ownership costs

Group headline loss before tax
Headline tax credit

Group headline loss after tax
Non-headline items
Non-headline tax credit/(charge)

Group total loss after tax

£ per seat – Airline only 

Airline revenue
Headline costs excluding fuel, balance sheet FX and ownership costs
Fuel

Headline EBITDAR
Balance sheet foreign exchange gain
Other ownership costs

Airline headline loss before tax
Headline tax credit

Airline headline loss after tax
Non-headline items
Non-headline tax credit

Airline total loss after tax

2021

1,458
(1,638)
(371)
(551)
9
(594)
(1,136)
236
(900)
100
(58)

(858)

2021

50.54
(56.62)
(13.16)
(19.24)
0.32
(20.95)
(39.87)
8.39
(31.48)
3.53
(2.07)

(30.02)

2020

3,009
(2,561)
(721)
(273)
–
(562)
(835)
110
(725)
(438)
84

(1,079)

2020

54.35
(45.74)
(13.09)
(4.48)
–
(10.20)
(14.68)
1.92
(12.76)
(7.98)
1.52

(19.22)

Due to the continued impact of Covid-19, in the 2021 financial year easyJet flew 20.4 million passengers (2020: 48.1 million), down 58% 
on the prior year. As a result, Group headline loss before tax was £1,136 million for the year ended 30 September 2021 (2020: loss of £835 
million) and Group total reported loss after tax for the year was £858 million (2020: loss of £1,079 million). 

With a full year impact of Covid-19 driving reduced flying and the softer macro-level demand, Group revenue for the full year decreased 
by 51.6% to £1,458 million (2020: £3,009 million), and Airline revenue per seat for the year fell 7.0% to £50.54 (2020: £54.35), and by 

66 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

6.4% at constant currency. It should be noted that Covid-19 restrictions started in March 2020 and therefore did not impact the first half 
of the 2020 comparative financial year when easyJet delivered revenue per seat 9.6% higher than 2019 and load factors of 90.3%.

The ongoing restrictions on travel imposed by governments in response to Covid-19 have continued to adversely impact air travel. 
Our focus over the winter season was on cash generative flying to minimise cash burn. During the second half of the year, there was 
continued uncertainty due to the changing environment, however travel restrictions were eased across much of Europe. easyJet 
successfully maintained a disciplined focus and agile approach on matching capacity to available demand especially across UK domestics 
and mainland Europe.

As a result, cash burn (on a fixed costs plus capex basis) during 2021 was £36 million per week on average, outperforming the guidance 
for £40 million per week. Strong cash management also meant that operating cash generation was broadly flat in H2 with a £10 million 
cash outflow versus  £1,438 million in H1.

Group headline costs excluding fuel, balance sheet FX revaluations and ownership costs for the full year fell by 36% to £1,638 million 
(2020: £2,561 million), mainly as a result of the reduced level of flying. Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel, balance sheet FX 
revaluations and ownership costs increased to £56.62 (2020: £45.74), driven by lower volumes, with fixed costs being spread over lower 
flown capacity. easyJet’s cost reduction programme which was implemented in 2020 continues to achieve significant savings with the 
Group also benefitting from the extension of furlough schemes in the UK and across Europe.

Group fuel costs of £371 million were £350 million lower than the 2020 financial year (2020: £721 million) primarily as a result of the 
reduced flying. Airline fuel cost per seat of £13.16 (2020: £13.09) was in line with the prior year. There was an underlying decrease in the 
market price of fuel by 3.7% which was offset by the comparative benefits of the carbon credits asset sales in 2020. When considering 
easyJet’s fuel and US dollar hedging programme, the effective fuel price decreased by 4.1% to £469 per tonne (2020: £489 per tonne).

Group ownership costs increased by 4.1% to £585 million (2020: £562 million) predominantly driven by increased interest costs as a result 
of higher levels of debt, partially offset by lower maintenance related depreciation as a result of the reduction in flying volumes.

A Group non-headline gain of £100 million (2020: £438 million loss) was recognised in the year. This consisted of a £65 million gain as a 
result of the sale and leaseback of 35 aircraft and 2 engines during the year, a £61 million credit in relation to our restructuring 
programme; offset by a £27 million net charge related to hedge discontinuation and ineffectiveness.

All per seat metrics are for the Airline business only as the inclusion of hotel-related revenue and costs from the holidays business 
will distort the revenue per seat and cost per seat metrics as these are not directly correlated to the seats flown by the Airline 
business. The segmental note within the consolidated financial statements shows the contribution of each operating segment 
towards the Group’s performance. All seats flown relate directly to the Airline business and are therefore included in total for the 
per seat metrics. The overall contribution of the holidays segment to the financial performance of the consolidated Group for the 
year ended 30 September 2021 was not significant. As a result, presenting the Airline-only financial performance metrics below 
does not materially distort the financial performance of the Group as a whole.

Amounts presented at constant currency are an alternative performance measure and not determined in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards but provide relevant and comparative reporting for users.

The Group total tax credit for the year was £178 million (2020: £194 million credit). The effective tax rate for the year was 17.2% 
(2020: 15.3%). 

Loss per share and dividends per share

Basic headline loss per share
Basic total loss per share
Diluted headline loss per share

2021

2020*

Change in  

Pence per share

Pence per share

pence per share

(166.9)
(159.0)
(166.9)

(149.7)
(222.9)
(149.7)

(17.2)
63.9
(17.2)

During the year a rights issue, which gave rise to £1,197 million net proceeds, resulted in the prior year basic and diluted loss per share 
needing to be restated. 

Basic headline loss per share was 166.9 pence (2020: loss per share 149.7 pence) and basic total loss per share was 159.0 pence (2020: 
loss per share 222.9 pence) driven by the losses for the year. Weighted average shares in issue in the 2021 financial year were 539 million 
(diluted 544 million) (2020: 484 million, diluted 489 million, restated due to the rights issue from 407 million, diluted 412 million).

In line with easyJet’s dividend policy of a pay-out ratio of 50% of headline profit after tax, the Board did not recommend the payment 
of a dividend in respect of the year ended 30 September 2021 (2020: £nil). No dividend payments have been made in the year (2020: 
43.9 pence per share was paid for the 2019 dividend). The dividend policy will be reviewed by the Board during the 2022 financial year.

 *  Restated as a result of the 2021 rights issue.

Return on capital employed (ROCE)

Headline Return on capital employed 
Total Return on capital employed

2021

(25.5%)
(22.4%)

2020

(19.9%)
(23.0%)

Headline ROCE for the year was (25.5)%, a decline of 5.6 percentage points on the prior year, driven by the increased loss for the year. 
Total ROCE for the year was (22.4)%, in line with last year. The total ROCE improvement is mainly driven by the non-headline sale and 
leaseback gain and restructuring credit impact on operating profit. 

ROCE is calculated by taking operating loss, less tax at the prevailing UK corporation tax rate at the end of the financial year, divided by 
average capital employed. Capital employed is shareholders’ equity less net debt.

www.easyJet.com

67

STRATEGIC REPORT FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONT INUE D)

Exchange rates
The proportion of revenue denominated in currencies other than Sterling remained broadly consistent year on year, although the 
proportion of Sterling revenue has declined as a result of a faster recovery in demand across Europe. The proportion of US Dollar by 
currency has changed significantly year on year as a result of the US Dollar exchange impact of sale and leaseback proceeds. Average 
effective exchange rates include the impact of hedging:

Sterling
Euro
US dollar
Other (principally Swiss franc)

Average exchange rates

Euro – revenue
Euro – costs
US dollar
Swiss franc

2021

34%
52%
0%
14%

Revenue

2020

42%
47%
1%
10%

2021

42%
21%
32%
5%

2021

€1.14
€1.16
$1.16
CHF 1.21

Costs

2020

50%
31%
13%
6%

2020

€1.13
€1.15
$1.39
CHF 1.26

The Group’s foreign currency risk management policy aims to reduce the impact of fluctuations in exchange rates on future cash 
flows; however, the timing of cash flows can be different to the timing of recognition within the income statement resulting in foreign 
exchange movements. 

As a result of the reduced flying programme the Group’s near term exposures for jet fuel and foreign currency were significantly reduced. 
This caused a proportion of derivatives previously hedge accounted for to be discontinued from hedge relationships. The full fair value at 
the time of discontinuation recorded in the income statement as a non-headline item and subsequent movements in fair value recorded 
as headline items.

To minimise the effects of over-hedging going forward, easyJet temporarily reduced its operational hedging activity throughout the year.

Please see note 25 for further detail on hedging activities during the year.

Headline exchange rate impact

Favourable/(adverse)
Total revenue
Fuel
Headline costs excluding fuel
Prior year balance sheet revaluations

Headline total before tax

Non-headline exchange rate impact

Favourable/(adverse)
Non-headline costs

Non-headline total before tax

Euro 
£ million
(7)
–
17
–

10

Euro 
£ million
7
7

Swiss franc 
£ million
(2)
–
4
3

5

Swiss franc 
£ million
–
–

US dollar 
£ million
–
1
8
2

11

US dollar 
£ million
(19)
(19)

Other 
£ million
(1)
–
(1)
–

(2)

Other 
£ million
–
–

Total 
£ million
(10)
1
28
5

24

Total 
£ million
(12)
(12)

There was a £12 million favourable (2020: £9 million favourable) impact on total loss due to the year-on-year changes in exchange rates. 
A £24 million favourable (2020: £29 million favourable) impact on headline profit was partially offset by a £12 million adverse (2020: 
£20 million adverse) impact on the non-headline items. 

Financial performance
Revenue

Passenger revenue
Ancillary revenue

Total revenue

Group  

 £ million

1,000
458
1,458

2021

Airline  

£ per seat

35.48
15.06
50.54

Group  

£ million

2,303
706
3,009

2020

Airline  

£ per seat

41.78
12.57
54.35

The total number of passengers carried decreased by 57.6% to 20.4 million (2020: 48.1 million), driven by a reduction in seats flown of 
48.8% to 28.2 million seats (2020: 55.1 million) as a result of lower levels of flying due to the ongoing impact of Covid-19 on travel 
restrictions. Load factor decreased by 14.7 percentage points to 72.5% (2020: 87.2%).

During 2021 the airline industry has continued to be heavily disrupted by Covid-19, which has resulted in sustained softness in macro-level 
demand as customers’ confidence and ability to travel have been impacted by fluctuating infection rates across the UK and Europe, 
resulting in local and national lockdowns and frequent changes in travel restrictions and travel advice.

With an annualised impact of Covid-19, Group revenue for the full year decreased by 51.6% to £1,458 million (2020: £3,009 million), and 
Airline revenue per seat for the year fell 7.0% to £50.54 (2020: £54.35), and by 6.4% at constant currency. It should be noted that during 
the first half of the 2020 comparative financial year, easyJet delivered very strong underlying trading, with Covid-19 restrictions affecting 
the second half. 

68 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

As a result of reduced travel restrictions, revenue rose 94.4% to £1,218 million for the second half of the 2021 financial year compared to 
the second half of last year (H2 2020: £627 million).

Our dynamic capacity management and contribution forecasting allowed us to adapt our schedule to maximise profitable flying and to 
mitigate costs, with our flexible policies providing customers the reassurance to book. During the fourth quarter travel restrictions have 
begun to stabilise and to ease, which has led to an improvement in new bookings towards the end of the quarter for 2022 departures.

During the year we launched our new cabin bag proposition as well as our Standard Plus fare, which have provided us the tools to 
enhance our ancillary customer proposition and to deliver ancillary revenue per seat of £15.06, 19.9% higher than last year (2020: £12.57).

Headline costs excluding fuel
Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel increased by 38.1% to £77.25 (2020: £55.94) and increased by 40.6% at constant currency.

Operating costs and income
Airports, ground handling and other operating costs
Crew
Navigation
Maintenance
Selling and marketing
Other costs
Other income

Ownership costs
Aircraft dry leasing
Depreciation
Amortisation
Net finance charges
Balance sheet foreign exchange gain

Headline costs excluding fuel

Group  

£ million

2021

Airline  

£ per seat

Group  

£ million

2020

Airline 
£ per seat

446
495
102
222
60
319
(6)
1,638

5
456
24
109
(9)
585
2,223

15.01
17.56
3.62
7.90
1.94
10.80
(0.21)
56.62

0.20
16.18
0.74
3.83
(0.32)
20.63
77.25

938
629
206
278
107
426
(23)
2,561

1
485
18
58
–
562
3,123

16.88
11.42
3.74
5.04
1.70
7.38
(0.42)
45.74

0.02
8.81
0.30
1.07
–
10.20
55.94

2020 Group Other costs and Other income have been restated to reflect the grossing up of the sale and leaseback gains and losses. 

Operating costs and income 
Group headline costs excluding fuel were £2,223 million (2020: £3,123 million), a decrease of 28.8% or £900 million on the prior year. The 
holidays business contributed £54 million to headline costs in 2021 (2020: £45 million), mainly driven by marketing spend, headcount 
costs and costs directly related to holidays provided in the year.

Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel increased by 38.1% to £77.25 (2020: £55.94) and increased by 40.6% at constant currency. 
Most of the headline cost per seat adverse variance was driven by the full year impact of significantly reduced flown capacity resulting in 
fixed costs being spread over fewer flown seats. Partially offsetting this was the benefit of furlough support from the UK and European 
governments and easyJet’s cost reduction programme which continues to achieve significant savings.

Group headline airports, ground handling and other operating costs decreased by 52.5% to £446 million. Airline cost per seat decreased 
by 11.1% to £15.01, and by 8.5% at constant currency driven by reduced load factors compared to last year.

Group headline crew costs decreased by 21.4% to £495 million, with Airline cost per seat increasing by 53.8% to £17.56, and by 55.1% at 
constant currency, partly driven by reduced job retention scheme support, but mainly reflecting significantly reduced productivity due to 
lower flying levels.

Group headline navigation costs decreased by 50.4% to £102 million resulting from decreased sectors flown, with Airline cost per seat 
decreasing by 3.0% to £3.62 and by 0.4% at constant currency due to network mix.

Group headline maintenance costs decreased by 19.9% to £222 million, with Airline cost per seat increasing by 56.6% to £7.90, and by 
56.6% at constant currency, reflecting reduced capacity where fixed costs remain.

Group headline other costs decreased by 25.1% to £319 million, with Airline cost per seat increasing by 46.3% to £10.80, and by 46.9% at 
constant currency. The significant driver in the increase in the cost per seat is a result of fixed costs being spread over lower flown 
capacity. In addition to the capacity impact, there were a number of asset write-offs as a result of focus on spares and projects.

Ownership costs 
Group depreciation costs have decreased 6.0% to £456 million (2020: £485 million) primarily due to both lower maintenance related 
depreciation as a result of the reduction in flying volumes , an increased benefit arising from discounting the maintenance provision due 
to changes in underlying interest rates, and the reduction in our fleet size, partially offset by a revision to our aircraft depreciation policy.

Group net finance charges have increased from £58 million in 2020 to £109 million in 2021, due to increased interest payable from 
additional debt facilities and increased leased aircraft resulting in higher lease-related interest.

www.easyJet.com

69

STRATEGIC REPORT FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONT INUE D)

Fuel

Fuel

Group 
£ million

371

2021

Airline 
£ per seat

13.16

Group 
£ million

721

2020

Airline 
£ per seat

13.09

Group headline fuel costs of £371 million were £350 million lower than 2020. Airline fuel cost per seat of £13.16 was 0.5% higher than last 
year, and by 0.7% at constant currency.

Group fuel costs of £371 million were £350 million lower than the 2020 financial year (2020: £721 million) primarily as a result of reduced 
flying. Airline fuel cost per seat of £13.16 (2020 £13.09) was broadly in line with the prior year, despite a one off credit in last year of £55 
million which came from the sale of EU ETS credits. There was an underlying decrease in the pre hedge cost of fuel by 3.7% driven by 
lower fuel usage from reduced burn per block hour offset by increased market price. When taking into account easyJet’s fuel and US 
dollar hedging programme, the effective fuel price decreased by 4.1% to $469 (2020: £489 per tonne).

The impact of the Sterling/US dollar exchange rate movement on fuel costs was £1 million favourable (2020: £14 million favourable).

easyJet continues to participate in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and Swiss Emissions Trading System (CH ETS). As a result 
of Brexit, easyJet has also participated in the UK Emissions Trading System (UK ETS) from January 2021. These systems require easyJet’s 
carbon footprint to be offset by submitting carbon allowances to the relevant Environment Agencies. The charge of the ETS systems is 
included within fuel costs.

The Group uses jet fuel derivatives to hedge against sudden and significant increases in jet fuel prices to mitigate volatility in the income 
statement in the short term. 

As a result of the reduced flying programme the Group’s near-term exposures for jet fuel and foreign currency were significantly 
reduced. This caused a proportion of derivatives previously hedge accounted for, to be discontinued from hedge relationships. The full 
fair value at the time of discontinuation was recorded in the income statement as a non-headline item and subsequent movements in fair 
value recorded as headline.

To minimise the effects of over-hedging going forward, easyJet temporarily reduced its operational hedging activity throughout the year.

Non-headline items
Non-headline items are non-recurring items or items which are not considered to be reflective of the trading performance of the business. 

Restructuring credit/(charge)
Sale and leaseback gain
Fair value adjustment
Impairment charge
Balance sheet foreign exchange loss

Non-headline items before tax

Group 
£ million

61
65
(26)
–
–
100

2021

Airline 
£ per seat

2.19
2.28
(0.94)
–
–
3.53

Group 
£ million

(123)
38
(311)
(37)
(5)
(438)

2020

Airline 
£ per seat

(2.22)
0.69
(5.69)
(0.68)
(0.08)
(7.98)

Group non-headline loss before tax items of £100 million credit comprise:

•  a £61 million credit in relation to our restructuring programme. The credit primarily relates to the remeasurement of provisions following 

constructive negotiations with our trade unions (2020: £123 million charge).

•  a £65 million net gain as a result of the sale and leaseback of 35 aircraft and 2 engines in the year (2020: £38 million net gain as a result 

of the sale and leaseback of 33 aircrafts).

•  a fair value adjustment relating to a £26 million net charge related to discontinued hedges and ineffectiveness (2020: £311 million charge).

During the 2021 financial year foreign exchange gains or losses arising from the re-translation of monetary assets and liabilities held on 
the balance sheet have been recognised as headline items and will no longer be reported as non-headline items. No reclassification has 
been made to the prior year due to the immaterial value.

70 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Summary net debt reconciliation

Operating loss
Depreciation and amortisation
Increase/(decrease) in unearned revenue
Other net working capital movement
Net capital expenditure
Net proceeds from sale and leaseback of aircraft
Repayment of capital element of leases 
Increase in lease liabilities 
Loss on disposal of intangibles, property, plant and equipment
Net tax received
Net decrease/(increase) in restricted cash
Other (including the effect of exchange rates)
Net proceeds from issue of ordinary share capital
Purchase of own shares for employee share schemes
Ordinary dividend paid

Decrease/(increase) in net debt
Net debt at the beginning of the year

Net debt at end of year

2021 
£ million

2020 
£ million

Change 
£ million

(910)
480
232
(638)
(149)
836
(261)
(369)
(30)
1
5
(120)
1,144
(6)
–
215
(1,125)
(910)

(899)
503
(455)
263
(695)
702
(230)
(132)
(30)
13
(15)
(52)
409
(7)
(174)
(799)
(326)
(1,125)

(11)
(23)
687
(901)
546
134
(31)
(237)
–
(12)
20
(68)
735
1
174
1,014
(799)
215

Net debt as at 30 September 2021 was £910 million (2020: £1,125 million) and comprised cash and money market deposits of 
£3,536 million (2020: £2,316 million), debt of £3,367 million (2020: £2,731 million) and lease liabilities of £1,079 million (2020: £710 million). 

Debt increased by £636 million largely driven by two new sources of debt, partially offset by repayments in the year. A new five-year 
term loan facility of $1.87 billion (circa £1.4 billion) was entered, underwritten by a syndicate of banks and supported by a partial 
guarantee from UK Export Finance under their Export Development Guarantee scheme. easyJet drew down $1.05 billion of this in the 
period. In addition, a €1.2 billion 7-year bond was issued in the period under the Euro Medium Term Note (EMTN) programme. During the 
year repayments of £300 million from the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF), $500 million Revolving Credit Facility and circa 
£400 million of term loans were made.

Unearned revenue increased by £232 million during 2021, reflecting increased forward flying bookings in the last quarter of the year and 
pent up demand for travel, compared with a £455 million year on year decline in 2020 as a result of the pandemic.

The movement in Other net working capital of £638 million over 2021 relates to an increase in current intangible assets (mainly due to 
increased ETS carbon allowances held), a reduction in provisions (mainly due to lower maintenance, restructuring and disruption 
provisions), derivative financial instruments (driven by exchange rate movements and jet forward curve) and a decrease in trade and 
other payables reflecting a reduction in revenue refund accruals and APD deferrals offset by increased levels of flying.

Net capital expenditure decreased by £546 million to aid cash preservation and as a result of no final delivery payments made for the 
acquisition of aircraft in the year (2020: 14 aircraft). The number of aircraft in the fleet decreased from 342 as at 30 September 2020 to 
308 as at 30 September 2021 (which excluded 12 aircraft held under power by the hour agreements).

Net proceeds of £836 million were received as a result of the sale and leaseback of 35 aircraft and 2 engines in the year (2020: £702 
million from 33 aircraft).

Lease liabilities and capital repayments on lease liabilities have both increased during the year. This is driven by the increased sale and 
leasebacks completed in the year of 35 aircraft and 2 engines (2020: 33 aircraft). 

Corporate tax receipts in the year amounted to £1 million (2020: £13 million).

A rights issue in the year gave rise to £1,197 million of net proceeds, with £1,144 million of cash received in the year. As at 30 September 
2021, there were £91 million of proceeds outstanding, which have been subsequently received. Costs of £38 million were incurred on the 
rights issue and were still payable as at 30 September 2021. During the 2020 financial year an equity placing raised £409 million 
proceeds net of associated costs. 

www.easyJet.com

71

STRATEGIC REPORT FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONT INUE D)

Summary consolidated statement of financial position

Goodwill and other non-current intangible assets
Property, plant and equipment (excluding RoU assets)
Right of use (RoU) assets
Derivative financial instruments
Equity investments
Other assets (excluding cash and money market deposits)
Unearned revenue
Trade and other payables
Other liabilities (excluding debt)
Capital employed
Cash and money market deposits*
Debt (excluding lease liabilities)
Lease liabilities 
Net debt
Net assets

 * Excludes restricted cash

2021 
£ million

582
3,639
1,096
203
30
619
(846)
(1,128)
(646)
3,549
3,536
(3,367)
(1,079)
(910)
2,639

2020 
£ million

597
4,409
644
(327)
33
364
(614)
(1,242)
(840)
3,024
2,316
(2,731)
(710)
(1,125)
1,899

Change 
£ million

(15)
(770)
452
530
(3)
255
(232)
114
194
525
1,220
(636)
(369)
215
740

Since 30 September 2020 net assets have increased by £740 million. This reflects the rights issue undertaken in the year, offset by the 
loss for the year and increased debt.

Goodwill and other intangible assets have decreased by £15 million predominantly due to amortisation of computer software. 

The net book value of property, plant and equipment excluding right of use assets, has decreased by £770 million due to the sale and 
leaseback of 35 aircraft and 2 engines during the year.

At 30 September 2021, right of use assets amounted to £1,096 million (2020: £644 million) and lease liabilities amounted to £1,079 million 
(2020: £710 million) which reflects additions during the year as a result of aircraft sale and leasebacks, as well as the impact of lease 
payments and extensions.

There has been a £530 million movement on net derivative financial instruments with a closing net asset balance of £203 million (2020: 
£327 million liability). This movement is largely due to mark-to-market gains on jet fuel contracts as well as many out-of-the-money jet 
trades held at the end of the previous financial year having matured. This gain was partially offset by a loss on cross-currency interest 
rate swaps.

The equity investment of £30 million (2020: £33 million) represents a 13.2% shareholding in a non-listed entity, The Airline Group Limited, 
which has a shareholding of 41.9% in NATS Holdings Limited – the provider of UK air traffic control services for the UK. This investment is 
held at fair value, with movements recognised in other comprehensive income. 

Other assets have increased by £255 million, mainly driven by increased current intangible assets driven by an increased number of ETS 
credits held, and increased trade and other debtors driven by amounts receivable from the rights issue. 

Unearned revenue increased by £232 million reflecting increased forward flying bookings driven by pent up demand for travel. 

Trade and other payables have decreased by £114 million reflecting a reduction in revenue refund accruals and APD deferrals offset by 
increased levels of flying.

Other liabilities have decreased by £194 million, mainly driven by a reduced maintenance and restructuring provisions. Other liabilities also 
include a £37 million post-employment benefit obligation in relation to a Swiss retirement benefit scheme (2020: £45 million).

Debt has increased by £636 million mainly as a result of two new debt facilities, a €1.2 billion bond issuance and $1.05 billion drawn 
down from a $1.87 billion term loan facility with repayments of £300 million from the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF), the 
$500 million Revolving Credit Facility and circa £400 million of term loans being made in the year. 

As at 30 September 2021, the Group is unable to assess the likely outcome or quantum of the claims of the investigation by the ICO 
(Information Commissioner’s Office), group action and other claims following the cyber-attack in May 2020 and no provision has been 
recognised. (See note 1 under critical accounting judgements – contingency liability recognition).

72

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Key statistics

Operating measures
Seats flown (millions)
Passengers (millions)
Load factor
Available seat kilometres (ASK) (millions)
Revenue passenger kilometres (RPK) (millions)
Average sector length (kilometres)
Sectors
Block hours (’000)
Number of aircraft owned/leased at end of year
Average number of aircraft owned/leased during year
Number of aircraft operated at end of year
Average number of aircraft operated during year
Number of routes operated at end of year
Number of airports served at end of year

Financial measures
Total return on capital employed

Headline return on capital employed
Airline total loss before tax per seat (£)
Airline headline loss before tax per seat (£)
Airline total loss before tax per ASK (pence)
Airline headline loss before tax per ASK (pence)

Revenue
Airline revenue per seat (£)
Airline revenue per seat at constant currency (£)
Airline revenue per ASK (pence)
Airline revenue per ASK at constant currency (pence)
Airline revenue per passenger (£)
Airline revenue per passenger at constant currency (£)

Costs
Per seat measures
Airline headline cost per seat (£)
Airline non-headline (income)/cost per seat (£)
Airline total cost per seat (£)
Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel (£)
Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel at constant currency (£)
Airline total cost per seat excluding fuel (£)
Airline total cost per seat excluding fuel at constant currency (£)

Per ASK measures
Airline headline cost per ASK (pence)
Airline non-headline cost per ASK (pence)
Airline total cost per ASK (pence)
Airline headline cost per ASK excluding fuel (pence)
Airline headline cost per ASK excluding fuel at constant currency (pence)
Airline total cost per ASK excluding fuel (pence)
Airline total cost per ASK excluding fuel at constant currency (pence)

2021

2020

28.2
20.4
72.5%
33,348
23,594
1,184
155,664
311
308
331
239
198
927
153

(22.4%)

(25.5%)
(36.33)
(39.87)
(3.11)
(3.41)

50.54
50.90
4.37
4.40
71.37
71.86

90.41
(3.53)
86.87
77.25
78.62
73.72
74.66

7.64
(0.30)
7.34
6.53
6.62
6.23
6.19

55.1
48.1
87.2%
62,380
58,914
1,132
311,477
613
342
337
157
237
981
154

(23.0%)

(19.9%)
(22.66)
(14.68)
(2.04)
(1.34)

54.35
54.35
4.82
4.82
62.61
62.61

69.03
7.98
77.01
55.94
55.94
63.92
63.92

6.16
0.70
6.86
5.01
5.01
5.71
5.71

Increase/
decrease

(48.9%)
(57.5%)
(14.7ppts)
(46.5%)
(60.0%)
4.6%
(50.0%)
(49.3%)
(9.9%)
(1.8%)
52.2%
(16.5%)
(5.5%)
(0.6%)

0.6ppt

(5.6ppt)
60.3%
171.6%
52.5%
154.5%

(7.0%)
(6.4%)
(9.4%)
(8.7%)
14.0%
14.8%

(31.0%)
144.2%
(12.8%)
(38.1%)
(40.5%)
(15.3%)
(16.8%)

(24.0%)
142.5%
(6.9%)
(30.4%)
(32.2%)
(9.1%)
(8.5%)

www.easyJet.com

73

STRATEGIC REPORT FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONT INUE D)

Going Concern and Viability Statement
Assessment of prospects
The Strategic Report on pages 2 to 95 sets out the activities of the Group and the factors likely to impact its future development, 
performance and position. The Finance Review on pages 66 to 77 sets out the financial position of the Group, and Group cash flows, 
liquidity position and borrowing activity. The notes to the accounts include the objectives, policies and procedures for managing capital, 
financial risk management objectives, details of financial instruments and hedging activities, and exposure to credit risk and liquidity risk.

In accordance with the requirements of the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code, the Directors have assessed the long term prospects 
of the Group, taking into account its current position and a range of internal and external factors, including the principal risks. The 
Directors have determined that a three-year period is an appropriate timeframe for this viability assessment. In concluding on a three-
year period, the Directors considered the reliability of forecast information, duration and the impact of Covid-19 and longer term 
management incentives. 

The assessment of the prospects of the Group includes the following factors:

•  The strategic plan – which takes into consideration market conditions, future commitments, cash flow, expected impact of key risks, 

funding requirements and maturity of existing financing facilities (see below)

At 30 September 2021
Eurobonds

Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility)
Revolving credit facility
Term loan facility

Maturity date

Available funds 
(drawn and undrawn)

February 2023
October 2023
June 2025
March 2028
November 2021
September 2025 (*)
January 2026

€500m
€500m
€500m
€1,200m
£300m
$400m
$1,870m

The Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) was repaid on 18 November 2021.

 * Option to extend to September 2027 at lenders consent

•  The fleet plan – the plan retains some flexibility to adjust the size of the fleet in response to opportunities or risks
•  Strength of the balance sheet and unencumbered assets – this sustainable strength gives us access to capital markets
•  Risk assessment – see detailed risk assessment on pages 78 to 95

Impact of Covid-19
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic continues to have a wide impact across the travel industry. Restrictions on travel and quarantine 
requirements continue to be imposed by governments across our markets. The speed of vaccine programmes, efficacy of vaccines, 
along with differing governmental testing requirements continues to result in lower expected customer demand and load factors in the 
short term when compared to historical levels of flying prior to the pandemic.

Since the start of the pandemic, the Group has successfully raised circa £7 billion of liquidity through a diverse range of funding sources. 
Since the 30 September 2020 year end this includes raising $1.1 billion of sale and leaseback proceeds, securing a five year term loan 
facility of $1.9 billion underwritten by a syndicate of banks and supported by a partial guarantee from UK Export Finance, issuing a seven 
year bond of €1.2 billion, a rights issue raising £1.2 billion and securing a new revolving credit facility of $400 million. Term loans of £400 
million, £300 million of the CCFF and the $500 million revolving credit facility were repaid and cancelled in the period. The bond issuance 
was heavily oversubscribed which demonstrates external confidence in the easyJet business model and balance sheet.

Cash collateralisation triggers for key credit card acquirers have been renegotiated to reduce the risk of collateralisation.

The Directors have reviewed the financial forecasts and funding requirements with consideration given to the potential impact of severe 
but plausible risks. easyJet has modelled a base case representing managements best estimation of how the business plans to increase 
flying which assumes a phased increase to the schedule over the forecast period, returning to near 2019 financial year levels by the 
second half of the 2022 financial year and full recovery by the second half of the 2023 financial year.

74

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Stress testing
The corporate risk management framework facilitates the identification, analysis, and response to plausible risk, including emerging risks 
as our business evolves, in an increasingly volatile environment. Through our corporate risk management process, a robust assessment of 
the principal risks facing the organisation has been performed (see pages 78 to 95) and the controls and mitigations identified.

Due to the ongoing uncertainty created by the global Covid-19 pandemic, there remains a risk that the recovery from the pandemic 
could affect our markets, leading to travel restrictions being imposed at short notice and reducing customer confidence in travel. 
Accordingly, easyJet has considered the severe but plausible downside scenarios based on the potential impact of risk factors on the 
Group’s future performance and liquidity, including combinations of government lockdowns and international travel bans, leading to a 
prolonged recovery period, reduction in revenue yield, lower load factors, cash collateralisation of unearned revenue by card acquirers, 
and a reduction to anticipated forward bookings.

Both individually and combined these potential risks are unlikely to require significant additional management actions to support the 
business to remain viable, however there could be actions that management would deem necessary to reduce the impact of the risks. 
The stress testing scenarios identified in the table below show that there is sufficient liquidity assuming the refinancing of the existing 
bonds.

Going concern statement
In adopting the going concern basis for preparing these financial statements, the Directors have considered easyJet’s business activities, 
together with factors likely to affect its future development and performance, as well as easyJet’s principal risks and uncertainties.

After taking into account the net proceeds of the rights issue, the new revolving credit facility and the other sources of funding 
described above, easyJet has unrestricted access to £4.4 billion of liquidity and has retained ownership of 59% of the total fleet with 
44% being unencumbered. This presents an improved liquidity position of £2.1 billion since 30 September 2020 year end.

In modelling the impact of severe but plausible downside risks, the Directors have considered travel restrictions including government 
lockdowns and international travel bans, leading to a prolonged recovery period, reduction in revenue yield, lower load factors, cash 
collaterisation of unearned revenue by card acquirers, and a reduction to anticipated forward bookings. 

After reviewing the current liquidity position, financial forecasts, stress testing of potential risks and considering the uncertainties 
described above and the committed funding facilities, the Directors believe it appropriate to continue to adopt the going concern basis 
of accounting in preparing the Group financial statements without the inclusion of material uncertainty which has been removed since 
the interim financial statements as at 31 March 2021 and the full year financial statements as at 30 September 2020.

www.easyJet.com

75

STRATEGIC REPORT FINANCIAL REVIEW (CONT INUE D)

Viability Statement 
Based on the assessment performed, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group will be able to 
continue in operation and meet all liabilities as they fall due up to September 2024. In making this statement, the Directors have made 
the following key assumptions:

1.  easyJet has access to a variety of funding options including capital markets, aircraft financing and bank or government debt. The 
downside stress testing demonstrates that the current funding with refinancing of the existing bonds would be sufficient to retain 
liquidity.

2.  In assessing viability, it is assumed that the detailed risk management process as outlined on pages 78 to 95 captures all plausible 

risks, and that the mitigating actions are implemented on a timely basis and have the intended impact. 

3.  The impact of Covid-19 is not more prolonged or significant than the severe but plausible downside stress testing performed. More 
severe scenarios, either through multiple risks occurring concurrently or risks which are not able to be mitigated by management 
actions to the extent expected, do not occur.

4.  There will not be another prolonged grounding of a substantial portion of the fleet.

The key risks that are most likely to have a significant impact of easyJet’s viability are shown below along with how the risk has been 
considered in the stress testing and what actions are in place to mitigate against the identified risk. The principal risks have continued to 
be assessed for any changes in the risk environment.

Risk theme

Asset efficiency 
and 
effectiveness

Impact on viability 
1.  Unavailability of slots or 

partial fleet

2.  Single aircraft type 

operation

Risks considered and stress testing performed
•  Schedule reductions/cancellations or 
partial grounding leading to reduction 
in revenue of 10% (1,2)

Management action and Board considerations
•  Robust effective cross functional 

governance structures (1)

•  Work closely with Airbus to retain some 

•  Loss of market share due to increased 

flexibility in fleet planning (2)

to customer demand (5)

stakeholders (3,4)

•  Sustainability strategy and governance 

structure implemented (3,4,5,6)

•  Emission reduction or offset 

programmes (3,4,5)

•  Work with relevant industry bodies and 

•  More fuel efficient A320 and A321 neos 

(3,4,5,6)

•  Regular engagement with easyGroup 

holdings and proactive management of 
brand-related issues (7)

•  Compliance framework in place 
including mandatory training (8)

•  Strategic planning to ensure flying 

schedules are responsive to demand 
and contribution positive (9)

•  Consideration of various sensitivities 
and stress testing to the forecast 
presented to the Board on an on-going 
basis (9,10,11)

•  Review funding requirements and 

opportunities in scenarios considered 
(10)

•  Finance Committee regular monitoring 
of hedging policies to reduce exposure 
to market price exposures for fuel and 
foreign exchange (11)

Environment 
and 
sustainability

Legislative/
regulatory 
landscape

competitor capacity (1)

•  Significant increase in costs (1)
•  Closure of existing ETS scheme 
leading to increased cost (4)

•  Increased cost of carbon offsetting 
and introduction of eco-taxes (3,4,6)
•  Reduction in revenue of up 10% due 

3.  Future environmental 

legislation 

4.  Changes to carbon trading 

scheme

5.  Reputational damage
6.  Increased taxation

7.  Brand licence impact
8.  Failure to comply with 

•  Loss of brand licence (7)
•  Sustained adverse media coverage 

requirements 

leading to reduction in revenue of up 
to 10% (7,8)

•  Significant spike in costs  

operationally (8)

•  Material legal and settlement  

costs (8)

Macro-economic 
and geopolitical

9.  Supply/demand imbalance 
including slower recovery 
from Covid-19

•  Slower return to previous flying levels 
and low levels for the next financial 
year. Impact of management 
initiatives (9)

•  Modelling excluding uncommitted 

10. Refinancing risk and access 
to alternative financing 
when required

funding (10)

11.  Market price risk: increase 

in fuel price, foreign 
exchange rates, carbon 
prices and inflation rates

•  Fuel sensitivities to $800/MT, adverse 
foreign exchange rate movement by 
5% and fluctuating carbon prices. 
Cost inflation estimates increased up 
to 3% (11)

76

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Risk theme

People

Impact on viability 
12. Industrial action
13. Talent recruitment and 

retention within the Group

Risks considered
•  Operation disruption and increase of 

costs (12,13)

•  Sustained inability to deliver strategic 
initiatives leading to a reduction in 
revenue (12,13)

•  Reduction in revenue of up to  

10% (12)

Safety, security, 
and operations

14. Major flight safety, security 
incident or health and 
safety incident

15. Supply chain challenges

•  Operational disruption and increase of 

costs (14)

•  Significant media coverage and 

reduction in future revenue of up to 
10% (14)

Technology and 
cyber

16. Failure of critical 
technologies
17.  Data breach and 
Ransomware

•  Fines/regulatory sanctions (14)
•  Inefficient use of aircraft/crew  
leading to increased costs (15)
•  Material legal and settlement  

costs (17)

•  Immediate loss of website and 
reduction in revenue of up  
to 10% (16,17)

Management action and Board considerations
•  Positive and on-going relationship  
with trade unions and employee 
workforce (12)

•  Regular employee surveys and action 
groups to focus on well-being, talent 
and retention (13)

•  Creation of Retention programme (13)
•  Hybrid working (13)
•  easyJet Safety Board meet monthly. 
Functional Safety Action Groups in 
place across the business (14)

•  Hull and Liability insurance in place (14, 

15)

•  A safety policy is published (14)

•  Regular Board updates on Cyber 

Security (17)

•  Dedicated Information Security  

team (17)

•  Ongoing monitoring of critical 

technologies and interdependencies 
(16)

•  IT governance structure (16,17)
•  IT major incident management  

team (16,17)

•  Cross functional committee to address 

customers legal and regulatory 
concerns (17)

www.easyJet.com

77

STRATEGIC REPORT RI SK

Risk management

Our corporate risk management 
framework
The Board approves the strategy for 
easyJet, including strategic initiatives  
and objectives, and ensures suitable 
oversight and governance through  
several management methods, including 
monitoring and reporting, strategic reviews, 
oversight committees and deep dives into 
specific risk areas.

The Board is ultimately responsible for 
determining the nature and extent of the 
principal risks it is willing to take to achieve 
its strategic objectives, its risk appetite, and 
maintaining the Group’s systems of internal 
control and risk management. 

The Audit Committee, on behalf of the 
Board, is accountable for reviewing and 
assessing the risk management processes. 
The Risk and Assurance team, which 
reports jointly to the Chair of the Audit 
Committee and CFO, ensures that robust 
processes are in place for identifying and 
assessing the Company’s emerging and 
principal risks. 

The Risk and Assurance team is responsible 
for creating, implementing, and delivering 
the corporate risk framework and reporting 
the principal and emerging risks to the 
Board. The team maintains a programme 
of risk monitoring with each function to 
ensure that risks are managed within the 
framework and to promote cross-functional 
management of risks. A key element of the 
corporate risk framework is ensuring that 
new risks and lessons learned from across 
the business are fed back into the risk 
management process and are shared 
across all functions. During 2021, 
supplementary financial modelling and 
analysis was performed by the Judge 
Business School at Cambridge University to 
model the corporately reported risks for a 
variety of interlinked scenarios. This analysis 
supported further deep dives into risk areas 
across the business, for example the 
impacts of climate change.

Each function across easyJet is responsible 
for understanding and managing its risks, 
whether they are categorised as principal, 
functional or emerging. Functions manage 
the risks arising from their functional plans, 
which incorporate easyJet’s strategic 
initiatives. This includes identifying and 
assessing the controls and competencies in 
place to manage or mitigate risks.

Ongoing development of the corporate risk 
management framework is a constant at 
easyJet, identifying risk management best 
practice across the Group and ensuring a 
unified and collaborative risk management 
approach. The Risk and Assurance team 
identify topics and relevant lessons learned 
from across industry, both within the 
aviation sector and beyond. These lessons 
are used to identify emerging risks and 
further enhance the easyJet corporate risk 
framework. These lessons are fed into the 
functional risk plans through continual 
dialogue with functional risk contacts.

easyJet continues to use the bow-tie 
methodology to identify the cause, effect, 
and risk management control of each 
principal risk. The information collated using 
the bow-tie methodology is used to set a 
framework of assurance activity. The Risk 
and Assurance team will work with relevant 
functions to ensure that risk information 
remains relevant and control deficiencies or 
gaps are identified, and development 
actions are implemented.

Risk transfer opportunities are developing. 
The Risk and Assurance team is tasked 
with identifying risks that could be 
beneficial to transfer from easyJet’s 
balance sheet to another party e.g. an 
insurer. This involves analysis of the risk and 
associated risk management controls and 
capabilities, to identify attractive solutions 
to jointly manage or transfer risks with the 
benefit of increased intelligence from 
third-party risk partners. This ranges from 
risk analysis and solution development to 
additional risk management expertise.

Emerging risks
Identification of emerging risks is a 
responsibility of both the Risk and 
Assurance team as well as each function 
within easyJet, leveraging risk and subject 
matter experts across the Group. If an 
emerging risk is identified by the Risk and 
Assurance team it is raised with the 
relevant function. An example of this in 
practice is the risks arising from climate 
change. The Risk and Assurance team 
worked in partnership with our 
Sustainability team to identify, analyse, 
quantify and evaluate the climate change 
risks that easyJet is facing. This was 
supported with further analysis from Judge 
Business School at Cambridge University. 
Further detail is found below.

78

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Our risk profile
The Board has responsibility to ensure that 
risks are identified and mitigated where 
possible. Whilst easyJet can monitor risks 
and prepare for adverse scenarios, the 
ability to affect the core drivers of many 
risks is not within the Group’s control (for 
example adverse weather, pandemics, acts 
of terrorism, changes in government 
regulation and macro-economic issues).

The principal risks and uncertainties faced 
by the Group include the following types 
of risks: 

•  Safety, security, and operations – the 
delivery of a safe and secure operation 
which meets the needs and expectations 
of our customers, including the impacts 
of epidemics and pandemics.

•  Technology and cyber – the availability, 
security, compliance and performance  
of website and critical technologies, and 
the protection of Company and 
customer data.

•  Environment and sustainability – the 
impacts of climate change on our 
business and operations, carbon credit 
programmes and regulation/ taxation.

•  Asset efficiency and effectiveness 

– making the best use of capacity/ slots 
and fleet mix in the right airports at the 
right prices, and driving value through 
our supply chain.

•  Legislative/ regulatory landscape 

– being aware of, and compliant with, 
legislation and regulation affecting 
our business.

•  Macro-economic and geopolitical 

– events that can affect our financial 
performance including supply/ demand 
imbalance, general economic trends and 
the impact of fuel cost, foreign exchange 
rates, and counterparty performance.

•  People – having the right people 

through talent acquisition, retention, 
engagement, and succession planning.

As with all businesses, our principal risks 
and uncertainties are continually evolving. 

Climate change: Physical and transition risks

Climate change presents significant 
financial impacts to easyJet from both 
physical and transition risks. In the next five 
years, in light of the challenge of 
coordinating global climate action, modest 
political, economic, and social changes will 
drive financial impact. More significant 
action to stimulate a low-carbon transition 
will accelerate the rate of transition and 
increase the magnitude of impacts to 
the business.

easyJet currently has the following risk 
management controls and capabilities to 
limit the impacts of climate change:

•  Inclusion of Airbus neo aircraft into the 
fleet which are 15% more fuel efficient 
per seat than the standard variant;
•  Offsetting of the carbon emissions, 

funded by easyJet, from the fuel used on 
every plane flown. For package holidays 
provided by easyJet holidays, we have 
extended the offsetting to cover the 
carbon emissions from the fuel used for 
transfers, and from the energy for hotel 
stays;

•  A range of fuel and carbon saving 

initiatives, for instance operating flights 
at high load factors, flying point-to-point 
and using only one engine when taxiing 
on the ground; and

•  Disruption management measures 
include advanced winter planning, 
standby crews and aircraft, as well as the 
continual review of flight plans to ensure 
the optimal routings. 

To limit the impact of our carbon 
emissions, easyJet has already taken 
several steps:

Compliance with regulatory 
requirements/standards: Our participation 
in the EU, UK and Swiss Emissions Trading 
System (ETS) drives us to focus on 
continuing to be as efficient as we can; i.e. 
by investing in transitioning our fleet to 
more modern, fuel efficient aircraft; using 
technological developments and flying 
techniques to operate them in ways which 
avoid unnecessary use of fuel and 
therefore carbon emissions.

A focus on energy efficiency: easyJet 
operates from sites across Europe including 
a large office and engineering operational 
presence in Luton in the UK and Berlin in 
Germany. Living up to ‘Our Promise’ to be 
Safe and Responsible informs how we 
operate day-to-day and that includes our 
ground-based operations. We have 
initiatives in place focused on deploying the 

latest energy-efficiency technologies and 
procedures to reduce our ground-based 
emissions. For more information, refer to 
page 49.

Stimulating low-carbon product R&D: 
easyJet supports the development of 
innovative aviation technologies, working 
with industry partners to reinvent aviation 
over the long term to achieve net zero 
carbon emissions. easyJet has a 
partnership with Airbus to jointly research 
the opportunities and challenges of 
introducing planes powered by hydrogen-
combustion, hydrogen-electric, or a hybrid 
of both for short-haul flying in Europe by 
the mid-late 2030s. Furthermore, easyJet 
has been supporting Wright Electric over 
the last five years, which is aiming to 
produce a zero carbon emissions 
commercial aircraft which could be used 
for short-haul flights. easyJet also engages 
with policymakers and lawmakers to help 
ensure the regulatory environment 
supports the adoption of zero emissions 
aircraft in commercial aviation. 

Compensating for our emissions: As 
announced in November 2019, we were the 
world’s first major airline to offset the 
carbon emissions from the fuel used for all 
flights. We are doing this by offsetting the 
carbon emissions from the fuel used for all 
our flights, our ground-based operations 
and package holidays, through schemes 
certified by the highest verification 
standards. Since then, we have gone 
further, offsetting our organisational carbon 
emissions (Scope 1 & 2) and, for package 
holidays, offsetting the carbon emissions 
from the fuel used for transfers, and from 
the energy for hotel stays.

Only programmes which meet either the 
Gold Standard or Verified Carbon Standard 
(VCS) certifications are supported, 
including projects that protect against 
deforestation and renewable energy 
projects. Certifiers ensure reductions 
claimed by individual programmes would 
not have happened without that project 
and that reducing carbon emissions in one 
place does not inadvertently increase 
emissions elsewhere. 

We know that offsetting is an interim 
solution and so we also continue to strive 
to reduce our carbon emissions and 
support the development of new 
technologies. Therefore, during 2021, 
easyJet worked in partnership with the 
Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies (CCRS) 
to conduct a detailed assessment to 

identify the physical and transitional climate 
change risks it is facing. Our climate 
change risks were quantified using a 5-year 
Enterprise Value at Risk (5yrEV@Risk) 
metric which shows how the risks would 
impact discounted cash flows over five 
years within a given confidence interval, 
e.g. 95%. The quantification and supporting 
research and analysis will further assist in 
the allocation of resource and capital to 
manage these risks.

In the near-term horizon, the potential 
range of impacts is driven mainly by 
transition risk. In the next five years, 
transition risk is likely to evolve rapidly with 
developments in regulation, energy supply/ 
demand, legal process, etc. There is 
significant variation in transition risk across 
emission pathways, with the most 
ambitious mitigation strategies resulting in 
the greatest risk.

There are several transition risks that are 
prominent, as easyJet develops its business 
and operations in a changing landscape. 

They include:

•  Changes in Consumer Sentiment 
•  Legislation and Policy Changes
•  Technology Developments  

(incl. SAFs and aircraft innovation)

•  Investor Sentiment and the increase of 

the ESG Agenda

•  Consumer and/ or Regulator Liability 

Claims

The five transition risks above were 
identified through easyJet’s corporate risk 
management framework, in addition to the 
physical disruption arising from climate 
change (physical risk). The physical risks 
were reviewed and incorporated into 
current principal risks, specifically 
Significant Operational Disruption and 
Pandemic.

Plans are in place to review each transition 
risk in conjunction with the current climate 
change risks detailed below in the principal 
risks. The action is to determine individual 
strategies and assign risk ownership 
through the corporate risk management 
framework. In similar fashion to the current 
physical climate change risks, ownership of 
these risks and their risk management 
controls and capabilities sits across the 
Group and ultimately with the Airline 
Management Board.

An update on easyJet’s climate change 
transition risks will be provided at the 2022 
Financial Half Year Trading Update.

www.easyJet.com

79

STRATEGIC REPORT RI SK  (CONTINUED)

SAFETY, SECURITY AND OPERATIONS
easyJet’s number one priority is the safety and security of its customers, colleagues, and contractors. The delivery of a safe and secure 
operation which meets the needs and expectations of our customers is critical to our business.

Risk

Significant Safety or 
Security Event
•  The Safety Committee  
(a committee of the 
easyJet plc Board) 
provides oversight of the 
management of easyJet’s 
safety processes and 
systems. 

•  The easyJet Safety Board, 
chaired by the CEO and 
including the Chief 
Operating Officer (deputy-
Chair) and AOC 
Accountable Managers, is 
responsible for directing 
overall safety and security 
policy and governance. 
The Safety Board meets 
every month to review 
safety performance and 
any emerging security 
issues.

Risk Owner
•  Chief Operating Officer

Commentary and areas of focus
•  easyJet’s number one priority is the safety and security of its customers, people, and contractors.
•  Inactivity and managing the safety risks arising from it have been a focus during the recovery 
phase of the pandemic. Emphasis has been placed on identifying training needs amongst our 
people and third-party contractors.

•  Enhancements have been made to operations and base risk management processes to improve 

reporting capabilities and feedback.

•  This risk remains unchanged. 

Potential causes
•  Flight safety incident
•  Health and safety incident
•  Major security threat 

Potential consequences
•  Significant injury/ loss of life
•  Sustained adverse media coverage
•  Reduction in future revenue
•  Fines/ regulatory sanctions
•  Operational disruption
•  Significant spike in costs
•  Share price movement 

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  Functional Safety Action Groups from across the airline are chaired by the appropriate senior 

manager and are responsible for the identification, evaluation, and control of safety-related risks.
•  The easyJet Safety Board meets quarterly to review safety, security and compliance performance 
across all Air Operator Certificates (AOCs). Chaired by the CEO and attended by the three AOC 
accountable managers.

•  Safety Review Boards are held monthly by each AOC, chaired by the AOC accountable manager 

and are often attended by the local regulator.

•  A Safety Policy is published that promotes the incident reporting process and supports this safety 

culture.

•  easyJet operates a Safety Management System that includes leading software systems to:

•  report incidents and identify events;
•  identify hazards and threats and take appropriate risk-mitigating actions;
•  collect and analyse safety data (enabling potential areas of risk to be projected); and
•  enable learning from easyJet and industry events/incidents to be captured and embedded into 

future risk mitigations.

•  Timely, credible, and reliable information upon which to base operational decisions.
•  easyJet has a Crisis Management framework that provides emergency response and crisis 

management capabilities, supported by trained personnel and regular exercises.

•  Hull (all risks) and liabilities insurance (including spares) is held.
•  Security cleared specialists continually review geopolitical developments across the easyJet 

network in particular those countries deemed to be higher risk and report back to the Board any 
areas of concern.

•  easyJet maintains an inspection regime of all our airports to ensure the security elements are 

being effectively managed.

•  easyJet continually reviews and develops its safety management processes. 

80 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Risk

Significant Operational 
Disruption
•  Non-cancellation 

disruption events reduced 
significantly in 2021 due to 
reduced air traffic control 
and airport congestion.

Risk Owner
•  Chief Operating Officer

Commentary and areas of focus
•  Pandemic related reduced traffic demand resulted in the European air traffic control system 

seeing significant reduction in Air Traffic Management delays.

•  Climate change related weather disruption is increasing but managed in part through a 

partnership with the Met Office, which supports with weather prediction.

•  Significant work has been undertaken to improve easyJet’s preparedness, including a move to 

exception management and improved decision-making tools.

•  Phase 1 of a Self-Service Disruption Management tool was launched in summer 2021 that provides 

greater control to customers in the event of disruption.

•  Increased use of the Crisis Policy due to the pandemic has resulted in improvements and greater 
understanding. The result is easyJet is better prepared to deal with significant disruption events 
should they occur, which will limit the financial and customer impact.

•  easyJet continues to face disruption challenges but the pre- and post-event preparedness has 

positioned the operation well and reduced this risk.

Potential causes
•  Adverse weather
•  Physical impacts of climate change
•  Industrial action
•  Technology failure
•  Destructive cyber-attack (i.e. ransomware)
•  Supplier failure
•  Infrastructure failure
•  Airspace/ airport restrictions/ closure
•  Increasing passenger disruption due to Covid-19

Potential consequences
•  Customer dissatisfaction
•  Compensation and welfare payable to customers
•  Inefficient use of crew/aircraft
•  Adverse media coverage 
•  Share price movement

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  Maintaining operational resilience through: 

•  appropriate resilience into the flying schedule; 
•  aircraft and crew standby; 
•  reporting on the day of operations, including customer communication;
•  airport performance and strategic supply chain;
•  air traffic control system lobbying and flight planning enhancements; and 
•  the use of data across the operation to predict and manage events and aid decision support.

•  Liquidity buffer to better manage the impact of downturns in business or temporary curtailment 

of activities.

•  Business interruption insurance which provides some cover for very significant shock events such 
as extreme weather, air traffic management issues and loss of access to key airports. The policy 
would allow us to claim in the event of a very substantial number of cancellations. This is included 
within our definition of liquidity.

•  Significant focus on risk mitigation of and preparedness for a destructive cyber-attack, including 

running a cyber crisis exercise for senior Crisis Team and AMB.

www.easyJet.com

81

STRATEGIC REPORT RI SK  (CONTINUED)

SAFETY, SECURITY AND OPERATIONS (continued)

Risk

Pandemic
•  The risk associated with a 
pandemic is among the 
most significant in terms 
of severity. Covid-19 
represents a paradigm 
shift in both severity and 
likelihood. 

•  Countries’ legislation 

affects airlines’ business 
with decisions to reopen 
borders without 
restrictions. 

•  Vaccine availability, 

efficacy and people’s 
perception of risk are all 
factors that must be 
considered.

•  The presence of virus 

variants is an example of 
high predictive volatility. 

Risk Owner
•  Chief Financial Officer

Commentary and areas of focus
•  Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, at least four infectious diseases occurred in recent years: SARS, 

Avian Flu, H1N1, and Ebola. The most significant differences between these epidemics and 
Covid-19 are they were short-lived, local, epidemiologically less severe, and with a much lower 
transmission index.

•  Previous epidemics did not result in severe restrictions (lockdowns or route closures) and so 

Covid-19 has created a new benchmark in responding to epidemics and pandemics.

•  easyJet responded quickly and decisively on customer, people and third-party contract health 

and financial perspective.

•  easyJet follows guidance from WHO and the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), 

which provides standards and recommended practices for civil aviation authorities and national 
governments, as well as the European Aviation Safety Agency, the European Centre for Disease 
Prevention and Control and country specific health authorities such as Public Health England.
•  We developed a Pandemic Playbook, that ensured a collaborative response and management of 

operational, financial, business continuity and recovery factors.

•  Financial resilience was maintained through the raising of circa £7 billion of liquidity from a diverse 
range of sources, including a 5x oversubscribed Euro Bond at competitive pricing and a sale and 
lease back programme.

•  Through the Covid-19 pandemic, we became adept at responding to rapidly changing market 

conditions and now have industry-leading agility to add new capacity and pivoting our schedule 
to capitalise on shifts in demand in future epidemic and pandemic events.

The likelihood of another epidemic and pandemic event occurring has increased but, through the 
actions we have taken to manage the impacts of Covid-19 and increase preparedness, easyJet is 
better prepared for future events. 

Potential causes
•  Global travel and physical connectivity
•  Urbanisation
•  Climate change
•  Increased human/animal contact
•  Health worker shortages 

Potential consequences
•  Suppressed customer demand
•  Sustained adverse media coverage
•  Reduction in future revenue
•  Increased regulatory requirements and scrutiny
•  Operational disruption
•  Significant spike in costs
•  Share price movement 

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  A Biosecurity Standards Group is in place and includes safety and security experts including 

our company doctor and representatives from across the airline. The Group is responsible for 
developing and maintaining our single set of easyJet biosecurity standards, which set out the 
requirements to ensure a safe and healthy environment for our people, customers, and contractors. 
Standards are translated into our Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and Communications.
•  The Pandemic Playbook, which acts in partnership with our Incident & Crisis Management Playbook 
and Communicable Disease Action Group, led by the Head of Safety and with representation 
from key functions, is responsible for detection, assessment, and treatment of pandemic and 
epidemic events. Treatment includes appropriate escalation.

•  A Communicable Disease Policy, that promotes the incident reporting process, supports this 

safety culture.

•  Governance structure including a Steering Committee (SteerCo) involving the Chief Financial 

Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Commercial Officer and Director of Strategy, to manage 
pandemic and epidemic events. The SteerCo is responsible for strategic oversight and 
communication with the Board. It maintains focus on long-term recovery.

•  Maintaining balance sheet strength.
•  Dynamic planning and capacity management process to manage supply and demand 

fluctuations.

82 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

TECHNOLOGY AND CYBER
The nature of these risks, easyJet’s reliance on technology (particularly online devices) and the ever-increasing sophistication of serious 
organised crime groups, terrorists, nation states and even lone parties means that, despite all the mitigation detailed, easyJet will 
inevitably retain an element of vulnerability regarding the availability, confidentiality and integrity of its information and data.

Risk

Cyber Attack
•  The aviation sector is 

facing into an increasingly 
sophisticated and 
persistent cyber threat 
and easyJet is continually 
defending its operation 
against disruption from 
attackers. The risk from a 
human operated 
ransomware attack and/ 
or data breach has 
increased exponentially. 
Ransomware is a type of 
malware that holds 
computers or files to 
ransom. To regain access, 
the victim is required to 
pay a large fee. Double 
exploitation (where 
ransomware is coupled 
with a data breach) is a 
growing threat. Prevention 
of ransomware is a 
strategic priority for 
easyJet. 

Commentary and areas of focus
•  easyJet is continually defending its operation against disruption from sophisticated attackers. The 

risk from a human operated ransomware attack and/ or double exploitation ransomware has 
increased exponentially.

•  Given easyJet’s position we remain an attractive target. This results in us needing to continually 

mature and enhance our controls, intelligence gathering and protection methods and testing our 
defences regularly using industry experts. To help our people keep pace with the rapidly changing 
threats we face we regularly educate and raise awareness of cyber threats across our community. 

•  The external risk environment continues to increase, however easyJet continues to invest in, and 

test, our cyber defences: 

•  attacks were well defended – known aviation attacking group attempts were blocked;
•  we continue to educate and raise awareness of cyber threats across our community.

•  We operate a risk-based improvement process leveraging the NIST framework as our aligned 

industry standard. 

•  We continuously invest in Digital Safety through our Digital Safety Programme, whereby we 

evolve with the threat landscape.

Potential causes
•  Cyber attack
•  Data breach
•  Third-party incident
•  User error
•  Misconfigured systems 

•  A data breach involves the 
unauthorised access to 
customer or employee 
data. Protecting that data 
and its privacy remains a 
priority for easyJet.

Risk Owner
•  General Counsel and 
Company Secretary

Potential consequences
•  Sustained adverse media coverage
•  Fines/regulatory sanctions
•  Third-party liability/class actions
•  Reduction in future revenue
•  Operational disruption
•  Significant spike in costs
•  Share price movement
•  Loss of colleague/customer trust

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  A data and cyber risk governance structure exists to regularly review the data and cyber risk 

landscape and determine required action to take place to manage risk effectively.

•  Dedicated Digital Safety team who provide assurance over third parties, proactively monitor 

threats, and respond to incidents. 

•  Employee education and awareness programme including a network of champions, online 

training, and awareness campaigns.
•  External threat intelligence monitoring.
•  Security logging and monitoring.
•  Vulnerability scanning and penetration testing.
•  Digital Safety programme to ensure compliance and ensure data control and protection. 
•  Credit card data is protected through PCI DSS compliance as a Level 1 Merchant. 
This is revalidated annually by an external body, to which we (and they) attest. 

•  Digital Safety is discussed monthly at our AMB and quarterly at our plc Board. Additionally, as part 
of our governance processes, the Digital Safety Board meets quarterly to discuss matters related 
to our Cyber security.

www.easyJet.com

83

STRATEGIC REPORT RI SK  (CONTINUED)

TECHNOLOGY AND CYBER (continued)

Risk

Failure of Critical 
Technology
•  easyJet relies on several 
critical technologies that 
are key to the delivery of 
essential business 
processes. 

Risk Owner
•  Chief Information and 

Data Officer 

Commentary and areas of focus
•  Critical technologies include, but are not limited to, operational, commercial, and financial systems. 

A critical technology failure includes any technical failure which is sufficient to interrupt critical 
business operations (which may include one or more systems).

•  System unavailability or a failure can also lead to loss or corruption of data.
•  easyJet seized the opportunity during the period of reduced flying resulting from the Covid-19 

pandemic to improve the IT environment e.g. airport network refresh and a data centre upgrade.

•  The external environment does present an increase in risk; however, this has been managed 

through improvements to the IT environment. 

Potential causes
•  Destructive cyber-attack (i.e. ransomware) 
•  Hardware failure
•  Aged infrastructure
•  Data centre outage
•  Third-party outage
•  Technological dependency failure
•  IT change 

Potential consequences
•  Sustained adverse media coverage
•  Reduction in future revenue
•  Fines/regulatory sanctions
•  Operational disruption
•  Significant spike in costs
•  Share price movement 

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risk
•  Monitoring and alerting of availability of critical technologies and their inter-dependencies.
•  Security logging and monitoring.
•  Vulnerability scanning and penetration testing.
•  Non-damage business interruption insurance in place to limit financial impact of operational 

disruption.

•  IT Change Management Process embedded to assess risk of all changes to technology including 

changes made by third-party providers.

•  Critical technologies are cloud hosted, hosted across two data centres or at third-party provider 

locations with necessary failover protocols and security perimeters in place.

•  IT Major Incident Management team is in place to respond rapidly to any unforeseen critical 

technology incidents including those of a security nature.

•  IT Supplier Relationship Management process to ensure that third-party services and associated 

risks are regularly reviewed and assessed.

•  easyJet is progressing the delivery of a hosting and network programme that will further improve 

the resiliency of core infrastructure and cloud connectivity capabilities.

•  IT and Digital Safety Policies and Standards that set out the technical and organisational measures 

for keeping our data and systems safe, as well as management of our IT assets.

•  As an Operator of Essential Services under the Network and Information Systems regulation in the 
UK, we have to comply with the requirements laid out in the Cyber Assessment Framework for 
Aviation which focuses on critical systems availability.

84 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
The environment and sustainability risks include the impacts of climate change on our business and operations, carbon credit 
programmes, regulation/taxation, and changing consumer and colleague expectations. easyJet’s promise is to be a safe and 
responsible airline. This is what guides our approach to sustainability, whether that be related to climate change, health and safety, 
diversity, or employee engagement. An update on easyJet’s climate change transition risks will be provided at the 2022 Financial 
Half Year Trading Update.

Risk

Carbon Trading 
Schemes
•  Adverse changes to 

carbon trading schemes, 
including the existence 
and/or cost of the 
scheme.

Risk Owner
•  Chief Financial Officer

Commentary and areas of focus
•  Changes to carbon trading schemes, including the existence and/or cost of the scheme, have the 
potential to create financial consequences by changes to existing cap and trade schemes (e.g. 
EU ETS) i.e. the reduction of free allocations, would translate into an increase in the cost of 
compliance for our business.

•  easyJet continues to develop its climate change agenda and has taken industry leading positions 

with both its carbon offsetting programme and use of the New Engine Option (neo), which 
produces 15% fuel saving compared to the Current Engine Option (ceo). easyJet has identified 
carbon pricing mechanisms as a transition risk.

•  However, based on the external environment easyJet sees the potential for carbon credit pricing 
to increase depending on how quickly governments wish to meet emissions targets, which will 
result in additional cost. 

Potential causes
•  Political change
•  Uncertainty driven by Brexit
•  International alignment
•  External pressure groups 

Potential consequences
•  Closure of existing scheme
•  Loss of free allocations, leading to significant cost impact
•  Introduction of new schemes
•  Inability to hedge in line with fuel policy 

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  easyJet influences future and existing policy and regulations which affect the airline industry 

through several different channels, including working with relevant industry bodies to assist in this.

•  easyJet looks to optimise fuel usage to reduce emissions and therefore reduce the potential 

impact of those schemes, for example ensuring optimal routings as well as using climb, descent 
and landing techniques to improve efficiency.
•  easyJet has an appropriate hedging strategy.

www.easyJet.com

85

STRATEGIC REPORT RI SK  (CONTINUED)

ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY (continued)

Risk

Increased Taxation 
•  Future policy measures 
and regulation to tackle 
the impact of aviation on 
climate change could 
impact easyJet’s business 
if they impose limitations 
and cost on how easyJet 
operates and the services 
it can provide.

Risk Owner
•  Chief Financial Officer

Commentary and areas of focus
•  Fuel is one of the biggest direct costs for easyJet. The business maintains a focus on operational 

efficiency to save fuel and CO2. Increased taxation has been included as part of our Climate 
Change transition risk portfolio. 

•  Expansion of other aviation-based taxes e.g. for departing passengers, could translate into greater 

compliance costs.

•  The financial impact of this risk is increasing due to external pressures applied by various countries 

across our network. 

Potential causes
•  Political change
•  External pressure groups
•  Customer demand 

Potential consequences
•  Significant increase in cost of existing aviation taxes/levies
•  Future expansion of taxes/levies
•  Policies to constrain growth/capacity
•  Increasing noise curfews
•  Pressure on margins 

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  By engaging with key stakeholders, easyJet seeks to reach a common understanding on the drive 
to impose policy measures and regulation to address the impact of aviation on climate change. 
This includes advocating for fair and proportionate measures which incentivise airlines to be 
efficient and which cover all sources of aviation emissions.

•  easyJet continues to explain its environmental performance, and the further action it is taking, to 
its customers and other stakeholders. For example, this has included highlighting the introduction 
of the A320neo and A321neo aircraft and their reduced emissions compared to previous 
generation aircraft, and work with partners regarding new technologies to radically reduce the 
carbon footprint of flying.

•  easyJet can operate flexible routings in the event of constraints being brought in. 
•  The new generation Airbus A320neo and A321neo aircraft are 50% quieter during take-off and 

landing than the equivalent previous generation aircraft. 

86 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

 
ASSET EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS
We maintain our competitive cost advantage by making the best use of capacity/slots and fleet mix in the right airports at the right 
prices and driving value through our supply chain.

Risk

Airport Infrastructure
•  Flying to primary airports 

is an important element of 
our customer proposition. 
The airports to which we 
fly may already be or may 
become congested.

Risk Owner
•  Chief Commercial Officer

Commentary and areas of focus
•  Due to lower volumes of traffic across the European air traffic network, congestion did not play a 
significant part in the day to day operation. However due to changing travel restrictions, traffic 
flows moved at relative short notice, which in some cases caused more localised traffic issues at 
major destination airports.

•  With flying volumes expected to increase throughout 2022, easyJet is anticipating congestion to 
return to pre-pandemic levels and will rely on the existing controls and mitigations to manage 
the risk.

Potential causes
•  Increased competitor capacity
•  Environmental restrictions/pressure restricting airport expansions
•  Delays in airport infrastructure expansion
•  Increase in airport charges
•  Changes in regulation
•  Ineffective slot management
•  Ineffective management of the airport operational environment

Potential consequences
•  Weakened customer proposition
•  Loss of market share
•  Inefficient use of crew/aircraft
•  Significant increase in costs

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  Where easyJet is affected by industrial action or other service interruption by a key supplier, 

resources are deployed to manage this as effectively as possible. 

•  Sophisticated processes and systems to ensure slot transactions are made in an efficient and 

effective manner.

•  Effective cross-functional governance to ensure optimal business decisions are made.
•  easyJet closely monitors airport capacity through a dedicated airport development team. The 

team works with airports to ensure the development of appropriate capacity for easyJet in a cost 
efficient and timely manner.

•  Managing aircraft gauge to improve our ability to grow.

www.easyJet.com

87

STRATEGIC REPORT RI SK  (CONTINUED)

ASSET EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS

Risk

Continuity of Services
•   easyJet is dependent on a 

mixture of critical 
technology and processes, 
employees, buildings/
facilities and third-party 
suppliers. A loss of one or 
more of the above 
components could lead to 
significant disruption to 
operations and could have 
an adverse reputational, 
financial or legal impact.

Risk Owner
•  Chief Operating Officer

Commentary and areas of focus
•  During 2021, significant enhancements were made to our Crisis Framework and our approach to 

dealing with service continuity risks.

•  The Crisis Policy was developed to operate in a hybrid working environment, so Crisis Team 

members can manage crises remotely. In addition, the Crisis Centre was upgraded to support our 
hybrid working environment.

•  Our Safety Risk team reviewed all critical suppliers ahead of the restart to flying to ensure they 
were prepared, and the inactivity risk was well managed by identifying and addressing training 
requirements.

•  Our Procurement Process was enhanced to include specific questions on suppliers’ business 

continuity plans and to identify and assign appropriate ownership.

•  With the enhancements made, increased use of the Crisis Policy and Procedure and a more 

flexible approach available, easyJet is better positioned to respond to continuity risks during 2022 
and beyond.

Potential causes
•  Failure of critical technology
•  Destructive cyber-attack (i.e. ransomware)
•  Significant external incident (weather, activism, terrorism)
•  Failure of third party
•  Industrial action   

Potential consequences
•  System unavailability for customers and/or staff
•  Inability to access key buildings/facilities
•  Sustained adverse media coverage
•  Unavailability of critical staff
•  Reliance on inadequate supplier recovery plans
•  Brand/reputation impact
•  Operational disruption 

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  The four key areas of business resilience (IT and processes, people, premises, and suppliers) all 

form part of easyJet’s functional business and airport Business Continuity Plans.

•  Critical IT systems are identified with ongoing efforts to match the business needs with recovery 
capabilities. The risk of system unavailability is now mitigated further, thanks to the adoption 
of the cloud and the select use of externally hosted systems, in addition to easyJet’s two 
data centres.

•  Incident Management Teams are in place 24/7 to manage low level IT incidents. If there is a major 
incident or an escalation of an incident that has a wider impact on other parts of the business and 
stakeholders, then it can be escalated into the Crisis Management framework via the Network 
Duty Manager. 

•  Time-critical staff have been identified via Business Impact Assessments and Business Continuity 
Plans, with regularly tested recovery desks allocated at alternate locations, should the usual place 
of work be unavailable. An increased provision of laptops and tablets also enables greater mobility 
and remote ways of working.

•  Procurement processes include risk assessments aligned with business objectives. These require 
relevant third parties to have their own Business Continuity/ Disaster Recovery plans and we are 
implementing a process to review a sample of these each year.

•  Maintain close working relationships with key stakeholders including, but not limited to, airport 

authorities and slot coordinators, lobbying where appropriate.

88 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Risk

Non-Delivery of 
Strategic Initiatives
•  The business continues to 

undertake several 
initiatives to support its 
strategy.

Risk Owner
•  Chief Data and 

Information Officer

Commentary and areas of focus
•  Market volatility arising from Covid-19 and its impacts, the external environment and organisational 
priority changes are having a negative effect on delivery of strategy initiatives. However, internally 
we have improved the control environment through greater ownership, improved business 
planning, reporting and involvement of subject matter experts.

•  This risk remains stable.

Potential causes
•  Inappropriate resource dedicated to change delivery and oversight
•  Changes in organisation’s priorities (may be driven by internal or external factors)
•  Scope change/time available
•  Approach and methodology for complex programmes

Potential consequences
•  Business benefits not realised
•  Financial underperformance
•  Inefficient use of resource

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  Complex, large-scale programmes have been initiated and prioritised through the Enterprise 

Project Management Office.

•  The Enterprise Project Management Office oversees delivery of projects and programmes 

ensuring dependencies are managed across the portfolio.

•  A project management framework, which sets out approval processes, governance requirements, 
and key ongoing processes and controls, is followed by all projects and programmes, and reviews 
are undertaken to ensure continuous improvement in this approach.

•  Each strategic initiative has an executive sponsor and a Leadership 50 lead assigned and its own 
steering group, which provides oversight and challenge to the project, monitors progress against 
programme objectives (including budget, benefit realisation and appropriate resource) and 
ensures that decisions are made at the appropriate level.

•  Key strategic initiatives are managed by dedicated programme management resource with the 

right skills and behaviours, complemented by subject matter specialist resource where 
appropriate.

•  The executive sponsor provides routine updates to the Airline Management Board and can use 

this as an escalation channel for any issue resolution.

•  The Board also receives updates on key strategic initiatives including any risks or issues to 

achieving the key milestones that enable the achievement of the five-year plan.

•  The Internal Audit function provides independent programme assurance over our most significant 

initiatives, drawing upon independent subject matter expertise where appropriate.

www.easyJet.com

89

STRATEGIC REPORT RI SK  (CONTINUED)

ASSET EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS (continued)

Risk

Single Aircraft Type 
Operation
•  easyJet is dependent on 
Airbus as its sole supplier 
for aircraft. The Board 
considers that the 
efficiencies achieved by 
operating a single fleet 
type outweigh the risks 
associated with easyJet’s 
single fleet strategy.

Risk Owner
•  Chief Financial Officer

Commentary and areas of focus
•  easyJet continues to operate a single type aircraft fleet. 
•  The operation is set up to manage the risks associated with a single aircraft operation, with 
maintenance and fleet management reviewed each year to minimise the potential impact.

•  Both the internal and external environment around this risk remain stable.

Potential causes
•  Delays in the delivery of new aircraft
•  Technical/mechanical issues
•  Fluctuating second-hand market

Potential consequences
•  Schedule reductions/cancellations
•  Grounding of all/part of the fleet
•  Loss of customer confidence
•  Financial impact when aircraft leave the fleet

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  There are 9,032 A320 family (A319, A320, A321) aircraft operating, with a proven track record for 

safety and reliability. 

•  Introduction of the A320neo in part mitigates this single fleet supplier risk as the aircraft is 

equipped with a different engine type. 

•  easyJet continues to work closely with Airbus to ensure full visibility of the delivery schedule for 
new aircraft. If there are material delays, appropriate mitigation is put in place; for example, 
short-term wet lease arrangements are used to minimise any operational impact. 

•  easyJet operates a rigorous established aircraft maintenance programme. Maintenance schedules 

are approved by the relevant regulatory body. 

•  easyJet regularly reviews the second-hand market and has several different options when looking 

at fleet exit strategies. Sale and leasebacks facilitate the exit of aircraft from the fleet by 
transferring residual value risk and provides flexibility in managing the fleet size.

LEGISLATIVE/REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
The airline industry is heavily regulated and there is a continual need to keep well informed and adapt (as required) to any legislative or 
regulatory changes across the jurisdictions in which easyJet operates.

Risk

Brand Licence and 
Major Shareholder
•  easyJet has two major 

shareholders (easyGroup 
Holdings Limited and 
Polys Holdings Limited) 
which, as a concert party, 
control approximately 
15.27% of its ordinary 
shares.

•  easyJet does not own its 

company name or 
branding, which is licensed 
from easyGroup Ltd. The 
licence includes certain 
minimum service levels 
that easyJet must meet to 
retain the right to use the 
name and brand.

Risk Owner
•  General Counsel and 
Company Secretary

Commentary and areas of focus
•  Given the size of the shareholding, our major shareholder can influence easyJet’s business in 

relation to actions that require shareholder approval.

•  Through regular communications, the risk associated with our major shareholders remains low and 

stable.

Potential causes
•  Shareholder activism
•  Actions of easyGroup or other easyGroup licensees

Potential consequences
•  Eventual loss of the brand licence

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  Active shareholder engagement programme.
•  Regular engagement with easyGroup Holdings Limited alongside other major shareholders.
•  Representatives from the Board and senior management take collective responsibility for 

addressing issues arising from any activist approach adopted by the major shareholder. The 
objective is to address issues when they arise and anticipate and plan for potential future activism.

•  Quarterly meeting of senior representatives from easyJet and our major shareholders, attended 
by the Chief Financial Officer and the Group General Counsel & Company Secretary, to actively 
manage brand-related issues as they arise.

•  easyJet makes contributions to the joint brand protection fund.

90 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

LEGISLATIVE/REGULATORY LANDSCAPE (continued)

Risk

Changing Legal and 
Regulatory Landscape
•  Failure to comply with 

Commentary and areas of focus
•  The legal and regulatory landscape continues to develop in the areas in which easyJet operates.
•  The speed of change has increased for both legislation and regulation.
•  The easyJet General Counsel Office (GCO), that manages legal and regulatory risks, has 

legislation and regulation, 
such as local consumer 
laws, new case law or 
policy changes in relation 
to customer 
compensation, 
environmental or airport 
regulation, in the 
jurisdictions in which 
easyJet operates, or data 
protection/ information 
protection regulations 
could have an adverse 
reputational and financial 
impact.

Risk Owner
•  General Counsel and 
Company Secretary

developed over the last year to be more prepared for changes

•  Notwithstanding the level of change increasing, this risk remains stable.

Potential causes
•  New or changes to existing legislation/regulation
•  Employee/agent ignorance
•  Rogue employee/agent behaviour

Potential consequences
•  Sustained adverse media coverage
•  Fines/regulatory sanctions
•  Reduction in future revenue
•  Operational disruption
•  Loss of operating licence
•  Significant spike in costs
•  Share price movement
•  Loss of colleague/customer trust

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  Compliance framework including, but not limited to, policies, procedures, and mandatory training 

programmes.

•  easyJet has an in-house team of legal and regulatory experts to advise on legal issues and 

developments,  
and to assist the business in interpreting any formal regulatory requirements. Where appropriate, 
this expertise is supplemented with specialist external support relevant to a specific discipline 
or jurisdiction.

•  Panel of external legal advisers, both in the UK and in key easyJet markets, is briefed to keep 

easyJet informed of any changes or new legislation and to assist easyJet in developing 
appropriate responses to such legislation.

•  easyJet influences future and existing policy and regulations which affect the airline industry through 

several different channels, including working with relevant industry bodies to assist in this.

•  easyJet adapts to new legislation and regulation, where possible adapting existing compliance 

frameworks (for example mandatory training programmes and clear policies and 
associated guidance).

www.easyJet.com

91

STRATEGIC REPORT RI SK  (CONTINUED)

MACRO-ECONOMIC AND GEOPOLITICAL
The airline industry can be sensitive to macro-economic and geopolitical conditions. These risk events can affect our financial 
performance including supply/demand imbalance, general economic trends, as well as impact of fuel cost, foreign exchange rates, and 
counterparty performance.

Risk

Supply/Demand 
Imbalance
•  easyJet’s success in the 

highly competitive 
European short-haul 
aviation market is built on 
our key competitive 
advantages: our network, 
cost base, brand, digital 
innovation, and efficient 
and robust capital 
structure.

Risk Owner
•  Chief Commercial Officer

Commentary and areas of focus
•  Covid-19 has impacted the aviation sector by suppressing demand and creating opportunities for 

both existing and local start up operators.

•  Consolidation creates a more challenging environment with fewer but stronger airlines.
•  As the aviation sector emerges from the pandemic, customers may favour value and low fares 

over brand loyalty.

•  easyJet has emerged as a stronger airline with the ability to respond to rapidly changing market 

conditions, having developed industry-leading agility to add new capacity and pivoting our 
schedule to capitalise on shifts in demand.

•  Despite increased competition, our enhanced scheduling capabilities and developing product and 

ancillary offering results in this risk improving.

Potential causes
•  Increased capacity 
•  Industry consolidation
•  Increased competition from other airlines and transport providers
•  Government interventions
•  Fall in consumer demand (including but not limited to macro-economic conditions and 

environmental concerns)

•  Internal growth plans

Potential consequences
•  Loss of market positions (relative market share)
•  Pressure on margins
•  Adverse financial position
•  Share price movement

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  Enhancements to our commercial organisation to provide even further focus on existing and new 

initiatives to optimise the revenue position.

•  Weekly trading meeting to review performance – attended by senior managers, including 

members of the AMB.

•  Relentless focus on maintaining easyJet’s competitive advantages through network positioning 

and brand.

•  The Network Development Forum, a cross-functional panel of senior managers, including 

members of the AMB, approves the allocation of assets around the network in the context of 
expected market conditions. 

•  Competitor and consolidation activity is monitored in detail by the Network team, enabling 

strategic decision making on key market positions. 

•  Fleet framework arrangements, together with the Group’s leasing policy, provide easyJet with 

significant flexibility in respect of scaling the fleet according to business requirements.
•  Dynamic planning and capacity management process to manage supply and demand 

fluctuations.

92 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

MACRO-ECONOMIC AND GEOPOLITICAL (continued)

Risk

Volatility in Financial 
Markets 
•  easyJet is exposed to a 

variety of financial 
markets, volatility in which 
could give rise to adverse 
pressure on the cash 
flows of the Group.

Risk Owner
•  Chief Financial Officer

Commentary and areas of focus
•  Through Covid-19 easyJet’s operational exposures reduced. Hedging positions were managed 

through this time so that at any time hedges became more than 100% of exposures, the excess 
was closed out. Any new hedging activity was reduced due to uncertainty in exposures. This 
approach was approved by the Finance Committee.

•  Due to the additional foreign currency debt brought onto balance sheet, easyJet has become 
more exposed to FX revaluation through the P&L. Hedging this full risk would have been costly 
and would have added more volatility to the liquidity position. It was therefore approved by the 
Finance Committee that easyJet would accept some P&L volatility, in exchange for a better 
managed liquidity position.

•  Hedging positions are maintaining a stable position of jet fuel price. However balance sheet 

revaluations are increasing foreign exchange risk.

Potential causes
•  Market price risk: volatility in jet fuel prices, foreign exchange rates, carbon prices, inflation rates or 

interest rates

•  Counter-party risk: default of counter parties used for depositing surplus cash and hedging 
•  Liquidity risk: inability to raise funds when required

Potential consequences
•  Insufficient cash to meet financial obligations as they fall due and/or the inability to fund the 

business when needed leading to insolvency

•  Significant increase in costs

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  The Finance Committee (a committee of the plc Board) oversees the Group’s treasury and 

funding policies and activities.

•  Treasury policy sets out plc Board approved strategies for market price risk management, 

counter-party credit risk management and liquidity risk management. Monthly reporting on all 
treasury activity including reporting on compliance with treasury policy. 

•  Maintaining a liquidity buffer supported by cash and a business interruption insurance policy. 
•  Ability to access diverse sources of funding to support liquidity requirements. 
•  Rolling hedging programmes on jet fuel and foreign exchange market price exposure.

www.easyJet.com

93

STRATEGIC REPORT RI SK  (CONTINUED)

PEOPLE
Having the right people is a key part of Our Plan. In today’s environment, we need to create an inclusive and energising environment that 
attracts the right people and inspires everyone to learn and grow.

Risk

Industrial Action
•  easyJet, and the aviation 
industry in general, has a 
significant number of 
employees who are 
members of trade unions. 

•  Each of the European 

countries in which easyJet 
operates has localised 
employment terms and 
conditions. As such its 
pilots, crew and engineers 
are members of 21 trade 
unions across seven 
countries. There are also 
an additional seven 
consultative bodies 
including five Works 
Councils and a European 
Works Council.

Risk Owner
•  Group People Director

Commentary and areas of focus
•  Highly constructive relationships with our trade union partners, works councils, and our people 
have allowed the business to adapt throughout 2021 and position the business to emerge with 
strength from the pandemic.

•  Productivity has increased by reducing the number of crew per aircraft. 
•  Sustainable improvements have been made using part-time and seasonable contracts, which 

were agreed with our union partners.

•  Agreements with our union partners have been made throughout the last year, with routine 

seasonal recruitment taking place to ensure the operation is ready to meet demand. This risk 
remains stable. 

Potential causes
•  Adverse employee experience
•  Changes to terms and conditions
•  Political unrest

Potential consequences
•  Sustained adverse media coverage
•  Operational disruption
•  Significant spike in costs
•  Reduction in future revenue
•  Share price movement
•  Loss of colleague/customer trust

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  easyJet seeks to maintain positive working relationships with all trade unions and other 

representative bodies and has a framework in place for consulting and engaging with trade unions 
and consultative bodies.

•  In the event of industrial action or expected disruption, easyJet has processes to mitigate the 

impact to our operations. The Operations department also has specific procedures to deal with 
such events. 

•  Adoption of innovative part-time working patterns.

94 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

PEOPLE (continued)

Risk

Talent Acquisition and 
Retention
•  In today’s shifting 

environment, we need to 
place even more focus on 
recruiting the right people 
and building the right 
talent.

Risk Owner
•  Group People Director

Commentary and areas of focus
•  Retention of critical talent continues to be a risk and is proactively managed, particularly given the 
continued uncertainty and challenge of our industry and our inability to offer compelling short-
term financial reward.

Potential causes
•  Uncompetitive remuneration packages
•  Lack of career progression
•  Outdated ways of working

Potential consequences
•  Sustained inability to deliver key strategic initiatives

Controls and mitigations to prevent or reduce the impact of the risks
•  Creation of retention programme for the 2022 financial year co-sponsored by HR Director,  

M&A and People Development and Reward Director.

•  Projects making up the programme include:

•  Leadership and Management Capability Development
•  Talent Development Programme
•  Inclusion & Diversity
•  Employee Value Proposition
•  Wellbeing Framework 
•  Recognition Principles and Platform 
•  Reward Approach 

•  Hybrid working across our office-based communities that support new ways of working with the 

right policies, processes, and technology to improve the employee experience.

•  Quarterly engagement survey across all communities to gain insight on employee sentiment. 

www.easyJet.com

95

STRATEGIC REPORT C H AIRMAN’S STAT EMENT  ON  CORP ORA TE  GOV E RNA NC E

CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT ON 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Contents of the Corporate 
Governance Report

Board and Airline 
Management 
Board profiles

Our governance 
framework

page 98

page 105

Board activity in 2021

page 111

Board Committees and 
activities during the year

page 118

Directors’ Report

page 154

The Board has acted decisively to make 
sure easyJet navigated the ongoing 
impact of the pandemic. 
John Barton
Non-Executive Chairman

A large part of the Board’s focus during the 
year has therefore remained on liquidity, 
with the approval of a new five-year term 
loan facility of $1.87 billion under the UK 
Export Finance scheme in January 2021, 
the issuance of €1.2 billion of bonds under 
the Euro Medium Term Note Programme in 
March 2021, and the launch of a £1.2 billion 
rights issue in September 2021. This was in 
addition to a number of sale and leaseback 
transactions, and the cost reduction 
programme. The Board has acted 
decisively to make sure easyJet navigated 
the ongoing impact of the pandemic, and 
ensure it is well-placed to take advantage 
of the strategic investment and growth 
opportunities that will deliver strong 
shareholder value in future. 

The Board has also been focused on 
refining its post-pandemic strategy, 
ensuring the safe ramp-up of operations as 
the flying programme has increased, and 
supporting and developing our people 
through the pandemic. A fuller summary of 
the Board’s activity during the year can be 
found on page 111. 

Introduction
I am pleased to introduce this report, which 
describes the activities of your Board 
during the year and our governance 
arrangements. This will be my last report as 
your Chair, having served for nearly nine 
years on the Board when I step down in 
December 2021. It has been an absolute 
privilege to serve as Chair. easyJet is a 
unique, dynamic and customer-centric 
business, driven by the passion of its 
people. I am proud of how easyJet has not 
only navigated so well through the 
pandemic, but has adapted and built back 
even stronger leaving it extremely well 
positioned for the future. I am delighted to 
hand over to someone of Stephen Hester’s 
calibre. His significant and varied 
experience leading major international 
businesses in regulated industries, coupled 
with his outstanding strategic thinking, will 
serve the airline well as it leads the recovery 
in the post-pandemic era, complementing 
and adding to the skills of the existing 
Board and leadership team. 

Board activities in the year
Our purpose at easyJet is to make travel 
easy, enjoyable and affordable, whether it is 
for leisure or business, seamlessly 
connecting Europe with the warmest 
welcome in the sky. Our ability to deliver 
this has continued to be heavily impacted 
by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. As a 
Board, we have remained focused on 
guiding easyJet through this period of 
sustained uncertainty and ensuring we are 
well positioned for the recovery, work 
which has been underpinned by our robust 
governance framework. 

96 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Brexit
The Board activated its EU ownership 
contingency plan to ensure continued 
compliance with EU ownership and control 
requirements at the end of the Brexit 
transition period in December 2020. 
Accordingly, easyJet has been required to 
suspend voting rights in respect of certain 
shares held by non-EU nationals so that the 
majority of voting rights in the Company 
are held by EU nationals. The work easyJet 
has undertaken to prepare for Brexit 
means that flying rights between the EU 
and the UK have been maintained. 

UK Corporate Governance Code
Throughout the year the Board has 
followed strong corporate governance 
standards and it has been a fundamental 
underpin to all of its actions. This is 
demonstrated through its full compliance 
with the Code. The requirements of the 
Code are described throughout this report, 
together with explanations as to how we 
have complied with its requirements, and 
signposts directing you to the relevant 
page where more detail can be found on 
how the Company has complied with its 
various provisions.

The following pages set out details of the 
composition of our Board, its corporate 
governance arrangements, processes and 
activities during the year, and reports from 
each of the Board’s Committees.

I wish all at easyJet the very best success 
for the future.

John Barton
Non-Executive Chairman

Changes to the Board
The Board keeps its balance of skills, 
knowledge, experience, independence 
and diversity under regular review, and is 
mindful of the best practice requirements 
under the UK Corporate Governance 
Code 2018 (the ‘Code’ or ‘2018 Code’). 

There have been a number of changes to 
the Board since the last Annual Report. 
Andrew Findlay stood down as Chief 
Financial Officer in February 2021, and we 
welcomed Kenton Jarvis as his successor. 
Kenton brings a wealth of industry 
experience and highly relevant skills to 
the role and we are delighted to welcome 
him. David Robbie joined the Board as an 
Independent Non-Executive Director in 
November 2020, and Charles Gurassa, 
Moya Greene DBE and Dr Anastassia 
Lauterbach stood down as Independent 
Non-Executive Directors in December 2020. 

Stephen Hester joined us as an 
Independent Non-Executive Director and 
Chair designate on 1 September 2021 and 
will succeed me as Chair on 1 December 
2021. I have been working closely with 
Stephen to ensure that there is a smooth 
handover. Stephen and our other new 
Board members have also participated in 
a comprehensive induction programme.

New appointments are subject to a formal, 
rigorous and transparent procedure, led by 
the Nominations Committee, and further 
details can be found on pages 121 to 123. 
Information on the induction process can 
be found on page 114.

The issue of diversity, both in the 
boardroom and throughout the entire 
Group, is taken very seriously by the Board 
as we believe this improves effectiveness, 
encourages constructive debate, delivers 
strong performance and enhances the 
success of the business. Ensuring that we 
have a culture which promotes and values 
diversity, and one which is maintained 
throughout the business, is a continual 
prime focus and is underpinned by our 
Diversity and Inclusion Policy which sets our 
objectives. The importance of this area also 
forms the basis for Board diversity and 

succession planning as we consider 
the best constitution of the Board to 
successfully take the Company forward. 
You can read more about our overall 
approach to diversity and inclusion in our 
other senior leadership positions and 
across easyJet, on page 56. 

I would like to take this opportunity to 
express my gratitude to all Board members 
who served during another challenging year 
for the Group. 

Stakeholders
The Board takes account of the impact of 
its decisions on all our stakeholders be they 
customers, employees, suppliers, 
shareholders, the communities we operate 
in, or regulators, while taking steps to 
secure the Group’s longer-term success. 
There has been a constant dialogue with 
our stakeholder groups, and on behalf of 
the Board, I would like to take this 
opportunity to thank them all for their 
partnership during the year. Working 
together has been vital, and will continue 
to be so as we seek a sustainable 
future together.

easyJet’s people continue to be 
fundamental to its success. Moya Greene 
DBE had been our Employee 
Representative Non-Executive Director 
under the Code since January 2019. 
When Moya stepped down, the Board took 
the opportunity to review the mechanism 
by which the employee voice is brought 
into the boardroom. You can read about 
our revised approach on page 109.

Details of how we have engaged with all 
our stakeholders to understand their views 
can be found on pages 26 to 37. A 
statement on how the Directors have had 
regard to the matters set out in section 172 
of the Companies Act 2006 can be found 
on page 36.

Board performance review
Our last external Board review took place in 
2018, therefore our Nominations 
Committee oversaw an externally 
facilitated review of the performance and 
effectiveness of the Board during the year 
in line with the Code requirement to do this 
every three years. A full report on the 
activities and the outcomes of the 
evaluation can be found on pages 115 to 117.

www.easyJet.com

97

GOVERNANCEBOA RD OF DI RECT ORS

AN EXPERIENCED AND  
BALANCED BOARD

N

N

A

N

R

S

John Barton 
Non-Executive Chairman

Stephen Hester 
Non-Executive Director and 
Chair Designate

Julie Southern 
Senior Independent Non-Executive 
Director

Nationality:
British

Appointed:
May 2013

Nationality:
British

Appointed:
September 2021

Nationality:
British

Appointed:
August 2018

Key areas of expertise:
Finance, Governance

Key areas of expertise:
Strategy, Finance

Key areas of expertise:
Finance, Aviation

Skills and experience 
John has significant board experience 
having previously served as Chairman of 
Next plc, Catlin Group Limited, Cable and 
Wireless Worldwide plc, Brit Holdings plc 
and Wellington Underwriting plc. He was 
previously Senior Independent Director of 
Luceco plc, WH Smith plc, Hammerson plc 
and SSP Group plc. He was also the Chief 
Executive of insurance broker JIB Group 
plc. After JIB’s merger with Lloyd 
Thompson, he became Chairman of the 
combined Group, Jardine Lloyd Thompson 
Group plc, until 2001. John is a qualified 
chartered accountant and has an MBA 
from Strathclyde University.

Current external appointments 
Chairman of Ted Baker plc and  
Non-Executive Director of  
Matheson & Co Ltd.

Skills and experience 
Stephen is a highly strategic and successful 
leader with more than 35 years of 
wide-ranging experience at major 
businesses, bringing a strong track record 
of value creation and listed board 
experience. Stephen has served as Chief 
Executive of RSA Insurance Group plc from 
February 2014 to May 2021, as Chief 
Executive of Royal Bank of Scotland Group, 
Chief Executive of British Land plc and 
Chief Operating Officer of Abbey National 
plc, as well as holding a number of senior 
executive roles at Credit Suisse First Boston 
in London and New York. He has also held 
senior non-executive positions as deputy 
chairman of Northern Rock. Stephen holds 
a BA (Hons.) in Politics, Philosophy and 
Economics from Oxford University.

Current external appointments 
Senior Independent Director of Centrica plc 
and Lead Independent Director of 
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.

Skills and experience 
Julie has significant board experience and 
has held a number of commercially 
oriented finance and related roles during 
her career. She was Chief Commercial 
Officer of Virgin Atlantic Limited between 
2010 and 2013, responsible for the 
commercial strategy of Virgin Atlantic 
Airways and Virgin Holidays. Prior to this, 
Julie was Chief Financial Officer of Virgin 
Atlantic Limited for 10 years. In addition, 
Julie was previously Group Finance Director 
at Porsche Cars Great Britain and Finance 
and Operations Director at WH Smith – HJ 
Chapman & Co. Ltd. She was previously the 
Non-Executive Director of Stagecoach 
Group plc, Gategroup AG, Cineworld plc 
and DFS Furniture plc. Julie holds a BA 
(Hons.) in Economics from the University of 
Cambridge and is a qualified chartered 
accountant. 

Current external appointments 
Non-Executive Director and Chair of the 
Audit Committees of Rentokil Initial plc and 
NXP Semi-Conductors N.V., Non-Executive 
Director, Chair of the Audit Committee and 
member of the Remuneration Committee 
at Ocado Group plc.

98 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Board Committees

Committee Chair

N

Nominations Committee

A

F

Audit Committee

Finance Committee

R

S

Remuneration Committee

Safety Committee

S

F

Johan Lundgren 
Chief Executive Officer

Kenton Jarvis 
Chief Financial Officer

Dr Andreas Bierwirth 
Independent Non-Executive Director

Nationality:
Swedish

Appointed:
December 2017

Nationality:
British

Appointed:
February 2021

Nationality:
German

Appointed:
July 2014

Key areas of expertise:
Travel and Tourism

Key areas of expertise:
Finance

Key areas of expertise:
Aviation, European Perspective

Skills and experience 
Kenton was previously CEO of Aviation, 
and Business Improvement Director 
– Markets, at TUI Group, having held a 
number of senior group and divisional 
finance roles at TUI since 2003. Kenton 
holds a BSc (Hons) in Biochemistry from 
the University of Manchester. Before joining 
TUI, Kenton was the Finance Director of 
Airtours Holidays and held a number of 
commercial finance roles at Adidas, prior to 
which he qualified as a chartered 
accountant with PwC.

Current external appointments 
None.

Skills and experience 
Andreas previously served as a Director 
and Chief Commercial Officer at Austrian 
Airlines AG. Andreas also served as Vice 
President of Marketing at Deutsche 
Lufthansa AG (Frankfurt) and Chairman of 
the Supervisory Board at T-Mobile Polska 
SA. Prior to this, Andreas was firstly Deputy 
Managing Director and later Managing 
Director at Germanwings.

Current external appointments 
Chief Executive Officer of Magenta 
Telekom (formerly T-Mobile Austria). 
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of 
Do&Co AG and Member of the Supervisory 
Board of Telekom Deutschland GmbH.

Skills and experience 
Johan has more than 30 years’ experience 
working in the travel industry, starting his 
career as a tour guide and occupying 
various roles in travel marketing and sales. 
Prior to joining easyJet in December 2017 
as Chief Executive, Johan was the Group 
Deputy Chief Executive Officer and Chief 
Executive Officer of Mainstream Tourism at 
TUI AG. Prior to this Johan was the 
Managing Director for the Northern Region 
at TUI Travel plc from 2007 until 2011. 
From 2003 until 2007, he was the 
Managing Director and Chief Executive 
Officer of TUI Nordic. Johan led MyTravel’s 
businesses out of Canada and Sweden 
between 1999 and 2003, prior to which he 
was Managing Director of Always Tour 
Operations from 1996.

Current external appointments 
Senior Adviser, Blackstone (private 
equity group).

www.easyJet.com

99

GOVERNANCEBOA RD OF DI RECT ORS (CONT INUE D)

F

A

N

N

S

R

Catherine Bradley CBE 
Independent Non-Executive Director

Nick Leeder 
Independent Non-Executive Director

Moni Mannings 
Independent Non-Executive Director

Nationality:
French and British

Appointed:
January 2020

Nationality:
Australian and French

Appointed:
January 2019

Nationality:
British

Appointed:
August 2020

Key areas of expertise:
Finance, Regulatory 

Key areas of expertise:
Information Technology

Key areas of expertise:
Commercial, Legal

Skills and experience 
Nick has substantial leadership experience 
with deep expertise of print to digital 
business transformation within the media 
sector. Nick has spent the last eight years 
leading Google’s businesses in Australia, 
New Zealand and France before moving to 
Ireland. Prior to Google, Nick was at News 
Corporation, firstly as Chief Operating 
Officer of News Digital Media and latterly 
as Deputy Chief Executive of national 
broadsheet newspaper, ‘The Australian’. 
Before that he was Chief Operating Officer 
of newspaper group, Fairfax Digital. He has 
a degree in pure mathematics from 
University of Sydney and an MBA 
from Insead.

Current external appointments 
Vice President at Google Ireland, 
EMEA Headquarters.

Skills and experience 
Moni has held a number of non-executive 
positions, including as a Board member of 
the Solicitors Regulation Authority 
(chairing its Equality, Diversity and Inclusion 
Committee) and at Cranfield University. 
Until 2017, Moni was Chief Operating 
Officer of Aistemos Limited, a leading IP 
data analytics and strategy company. 
From 2000 until 2016, Moni was a Partner 
and Head of the International Banking and 
Finance Division of Olswang LLP, before 
which she held senior positions with Dewey 
& LeBoeuf LLP, Simmons & Simmons and 
Clifford Chance LLP. Moni also served as a 
non-executive director of Polypipe Group 
plc (2014 to 2019), Dairy Crest Group plc 
(2017 until their acquisition and delisting in 
2019) and Breedon Group plc (2019 to 2021).

Current external appointments 
Independent non-executive director of 
Hargreaves Lansdown plc and Investec 
Bank plc, non-executive director and 
Chair of the Remuneration Committee of 
Cazoo Group Ltd, Deputy Chair of the 
charity Barnardo’s.

Skills and experience 
Catherine has held a number of senior 
finance roles for 33 years in investment 
banking and risk management, in the US, 
then the UK and finally Asia, starting with 
Merrill Lynch for ten years. Latterly she 
joined Credit Suisse as Managing Director 
for 9 years, first in London since 2003 as 
Head of Client Coverage and then in Hong 
Kong from 2008 to 2012 as Head of 
Equity-Linked Solutions Group for Asia-
Pacific. She finished that phase of her 
career as Head of Advisory Global Markets 
with Societe Generale Asia until 2014. From 
2014 until July 2020, she was a Non-
Executive Director of the UK Financial 
Conduct Authority and Chair of its Audit 
Committee, a Non-Executive Director of 
WS Atkins plc from 2015 until its delisting in 
2017, and a Member of the Supervisory 
Board, Chair of the Finance and Audit 
Committee, and Appointments, 
Compensation and Governance Committee 
member for Peugeot S.A. from 2016 to 
2021. Catherine graduated from HEC Paris 
with a major in Finance and International 
Economics, and was awarded a CBE 
in 2019.

Current external appointments 
Non-Executive Director of Johnson Electric 
Holdings Limited and Senior Independent 
Director of Kingfisher plc. Board Member of 
the Value Reporting Foundation and 
Co-Chair of its Audit Committee.

100 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

A

F

R

David Robbie 
Independent Non-Executive Director

Nationality:
British

Appointed:
November 2020

Key areas of expertise:
Finance, Governance

Skills and experience 
David has significant international corporate 
and board experience. He was Finance 
Director of Rexam plc from 2005 until 
2016. Prior to his role at Rexam, David 
served in senior finance roles at Invensys 
plc before becoming Group Finance 
Director at CMG plc in 2000 and then 
Chief Financial Officer at Royal P&O 
Nedlloyd N.V. in 2004. He served as interim 
Chairman, Senior Independent Director and 
Chair of the Audit Committee of FirstGroup 
plc from 2018 to 2021, and Non-Executive 
Director and Chair of the Audit Committee  
for the BBC between 2006 and 2010. 
David qualified as a chartered accountant 
at KPMG and holds an MA in English 
Literature from St. Andrew’s University.

Current external appointments 
Independent non-executive director and 
Chair of the Audit Committee at 
DS Smith plc. 

Changes to the Board during the 
year and up to 30 November 2021:
•  David Robbie was appointed on 

17 November 2020.

•  Anastassia Lauterbach stepped down on 

21 December 2020.

•  Charles Gurassa and Moya Greene stepped 

Board Committees

Committee Chair

Audit Committee

A

F

N

R

S

Finance Committee

down on 23 December 2020.

Nominations Committee

Remuneration Committee

Safety Committee

•  Andrew Findlay stepped down on 

3 February 2021; Kenton Jarvis joined 
the Board on the same date.

•  Stephen Hester was appointed on 

1 September 2021 and will become Chair 
on 1 December 2021, at which point 
John Barton will step down.

Diversity in the Board

easyJet recognises the benefits of having diversity across the Board to ensure 
effective engagement with key stakeholders and effective delivery of the 
business strategy.

Tenure

Gender

0-3 years: 7 (1 exec)

4-6 years: 1 (1 exec)

7-9 years: 2

Male: 7 (2 exec)

Female: 3

Age

Ethnic Group

50-59: 6

60+: 4

White: 9

Mixed/Multiple Ethnic Group: 1

www.easyJet.com

101

GOVERNANCEAI R LIN E MANA GEMENT BO AR D

An Experienced and FOCUSED 
MANAGEMENT TEAM 

Peter Bellew
Chief Operating Officer

Ella Bennett
Group People Director

Stuart Birrell
Chief Data & Information Officer

Nationality:
Irish

Appointed:
January 2020

Nationality:
British

Appointed:
May 2018

Nationality:
British

Appointed:
November 2020

Key areas of expertise:
Aviation, Flight Operations

Key areas of expertise:
People, Reward and 
Digital Transformation

Key areas of expertise:
Data and Information Technology

Skills and experience 
Peter has considerable experience across 
commercial and operational roles in both 
low cost and full-service airlines. Peter 
joined easyJet from Ryanair, where he was 
Chief Operating Officer responsible for all 
aspects of Ryanair’s flight operations, 
leading an international workforce of 
18,000 and working with HR to build 
relationships with European trade unions. 
Prior to this, Peter was at Malaysia Airlines 
for two years, latterly as the CEO, and 
before that he worked at Ryanair for nine 
years, where he held a number of roles 
including Head of Sales & Marketing and 
Director of Flight Operations.

Skills and experience 
Ella is a skilled Group HR Director with 
strong experience in the UK and 
internationally in lean and digital 
transformation, large-scale change as well 
as talent development and reward. Ella 
joined easyJet from Sainsbury’s Argos, 
where she led the integration of their 
non-food business to create a multi-
product, multi-channel business with fast 
delivery networks. Ella was also Group HR 
Director at Home Retail Group leading the 
people aspects of Argos’ digital 
transformation. Prior to this she was a 
member of the executive management 
team at Fujitsu. She earned her BA (Hons) 
in English Literature from the University of 
Bristol and her Master’s degree from the 
University of London.

Skills and experience 
Stuart spent five years as a Director and 
Chief Information Officer at Heathrow 
Airport Ltd before joining easyJet. He 
previously held the role of CIO at Formula 
1’s McLaren Technology Group where he 
worked in the high-performance 
environment building a team of in-house 
experts and specialist suppliers. Prior to 
that he spent three years at Gatwick 
Airport where he successfully separated 
the airport systems from BAA and brought 
improvements to complex IT foundations 
and transformation processes. Stuart brings 
with him significant experience and 
expertise in IT security, cloud-based 
solutions, big data sets and technology 
to support business expansion.

102 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Maaike de Bie
Group General Counsel & Company 
Secretary

Sophie Dekkers
Chief Commercial Officer

Thomas Haagensen
Group Markets & Marketing Director

Nationality:
Dutch and British

Appointed:
June 2019

Nationality:
British

Appointed:
December 2020

Nationality:
Danish

Appointed:
May 2018

Key areas of expertise:
Legal, Compliance and Regulatory

Key areas of expertise:
Aviation and Strategy

Key areas of expertise:
Commercial and Operations Management

Skills and experience 
Maaike is an experienced international 
lawyer with over 25 years’ practical 
experience in a variety of sectors. 
Maaike joined easyJet in June 2019 from 
Royal Mail plc where she was Group 
General Counsel accountable for all legal, 
compliance, claims management, security 
and information governance matters. Prior 
to Royal Mail, Maaike was a Legal Director 
and part of the governance body of EY 
LLP. Maaike also spent six years with 
General Electric, five years as General 
Counsel for one of its Capital companies in 
EMEA and was then promoted into the HQ 
office of GE Capital in Europe to lead the 
improvement of enterprise risk 
management & corporate governance 
across EMEA. She has also held senior 
international legal positions at the European 
Bank for Reconstruction and Development 
LLP in London and White & Case LLP in 
New York. She obtained her legal degrees 
in the Netherlands (in Amsterdam) and 
Canada (McGill in Montreal) and is qualified 
to practise as a solicitor in both New York 
and the UK. Maaike is also a trustee for 
Blueprint for Better Business, an 
independent charity helping business to be 
guided by a purpose that respects people 
and contributes to a better society. 

Skills and experience 
Before joining the Airline Management 
Board, Sophie held the role of Customer 
Director for easyJet. Prior to this she was 
Director of Scheduling for the airline, 
implementing systems and process 
improvements. She has also led easyJet in 
the UK as Country Director for five years, 
where she was responsible for driving the 
airline’s commercial success and strategic 
direction in the UK as well as representing 
aviation at both House of Lords and House 
of Commons Select Committees. Previous 
roles in the airline include Head of Change 
Management and Customer Insight, with a 
background in customer insight working 
with a range of brands from Jaguar Land 
Rover to Mars, Unilever and Vodafone. 
Sophie was also Non-Executive Director for 
Airport Co-ordination Limited from 2017 to 
2021 and sat on their Remuneration and 
Nomination Committees. Sophie is 
easyJet’s business lead on Diversity & 
Inclusion, a qualified MindGym coach, 
business mentor, and a founding member 
of easyJet’s Women’s Network. 

Skills and experience 
Thomas has over 20 years’ experience in 
operations management built in a variety of 
roles across Europe. Danish, born and 
educated in Switzerland, Thomas began his 
career with Tetra Pak working his way up 
to Regional Manager of the East Med 
where he developed and succeeded in 
implementing ambitious growth and 
profitability improvement plans. Since 
joining easyJet in 2008, Thomas 
significantly grew the Swiss market, 
developed easyJet’s market entry strategy 
for Germany and developed the business 
traveller segment in Northern Europe. 
Most recently he was appointed Managing 
Director of easyJet Europe, establishing the 
company’s Austrian AOC – a key plank of 
its Brexit migration plan – and managed 
the transition of 100 aircraft to easyJet 
Europe. Thomas holds a degree in Business 
Administration with a focus on 
management and marketing from 
University of Lausanne.

www.easyJet.com

103

GOVERNANCEAI R LIN E MANA GEMENT BO AR D (CONTINUE D)

Garry Wilson
Chief Executive Officer, 
easyJet holidays

Johan Lundgren
Chief Executive 

Kenton Jarvis
Chief Financial Officer

Nationality:
British

Appointed:
November 2018

See Board of Directors’ profiles 
on page 99

See Board of Directors’ profiles 
on page 99

Key areas of expertise:
Travel, Business Transformation and 
Global Markets

Skills and experience 
Garry is a highly experienced commercial 
leader working across international 
organisations, and has over 21 years’ 
experience in the holiday and travel sector. 
He joined the business from TUI Group 
where he most recently held the role of 
Managing Director for Group Product and 
Purchasing, leading commercial strategies 
across a number of markets and heading a 
global team across 20 countries. Prior to 
this, Garry worked in a number of senior 
commercial roles at TUI Group. He also 
held the position of Director of Europe, 
Middle East and Africa for American travel 
group Orbitz Worldwide (now Expedia Inc.). 
Garry has worked extensively with overseas 
governments, PwC and the Travel 
Foundation to create sustainable tourism 
policies to promote major economic 
growth and positive social change whilst 
minimising negative environmental impact. 
He was appointed to the Board of ABTA in 
April 2021. He holds a BCom (Hons) degree 
in Business Management and Languages 
from the University of Edinburgh.

Diversity in the Airline 
Management Board

easyJet recognises the benefits of having diversity across the executive 
leadership team to inspire innovation and increased performance.

Gender

Age

Male: 6

Female: 3

40-49: 3

50-59: 6

Changes to the AMB during the year and up to 30 November 2021:
•  Sophie Dekkers was appointed Chief 
•  Stuart Birrell was appointed as 
Commercial Officer on 16 December 
2020, replacing Robert Carey.

Chief Data & Information Officer on 
9 November 2020, replacing Sam Kini.

104 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK

SHAREHOLDERS

CHAIRMAN
The Chairman is responsible for the leadership of the easyJet plc Board (the ‘Board’) and for ensuring 
that it operates effectively through productive debate and challenge.

THE BOARD
The Board is responsible for providing leadership to the Group. It does this by setting strategic priorities and overseeing their delivery in a way that is 
aligned with easyJet’s culture and enables sustainable long term growth, whilst maintaining a balanced approach to risk within a framework of effective 
controls and taking into account the interests of a diverse range of stakeholders. There are certain matters which are reserved for the Board’s decision.

BOARD COMMITTEES
The terms of reference of each Committee are documented and agreed by the Board. The Committees’ terms of reference 
are reviewed annually and are available in the Governance section of easyJet’s corporate website at corporate.easyjet.com. 
The key responsibilities of each Committee are set out below.

SAFETY 
COMMITTEE
To examine specific 
safety issues as 
requested by the Board 
or any member of the 
Committee.

To receive, examine and 
monitor reports on 
actions taken by 
departments.

To review and monitor 
the implementation of 
easyJet’s annual safety 
plan.

NOMINATIONS 
COMMITTEE
To keep under review 
the composition, 
structure and size of, 
and succession to, the 
Board and its 
Committees.

To provide succession 
planning for senior 
executives and the 
Board, leading the 
process for all Board 
appointments.

To evaluate the balance 
of skills, knowledge, 
experience and diversity 
on the Board.

FINANCE 
COMMITTEE
To review and monitor 
the Group’s treasury 
policies, treasury 
operations and funding 
activities, along with the 
associated risks.

AUDIT 
COMMITTEE
To monitor the integrity 
of the Group’s accounts, 
and the adequacy and 
effectiveness of the 
systems of internal 
control.

To monitor the 
effectiveness and 
independence of  
the internal and 
external auditors.

REMUNERATION 
COMMITTEE
To set remuneration for 
all Executive Directors, 
the Chairman and the 
AMB, including pension 
rights  
 and any compensation 
payments.

To oversee 
remuneration and 
workforce policies and 
practices and take these 
into account when 
setting the policy for 
Directors’ remuneration.

Committee report  
on pages 119 to 120

Committee report  
on pages 121 to 123

Committee report  
on pages 124 to 129

Committee report  
on page 118

Committee report  
on pages 130 to 153

CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Responsible for the day-to-day running of the Group’s business and performance,  
and the development and implementation of strategy.

AIRLINE MANAGEMENT BOARD (‘AMB’)
Led by the Chief Executive, the AMB members are collectively responsible for driving the performance 
of the Group against strategic KPIs and managing the allocation of central funds and capital.

www.easyJet.com

105

GOVERNANCEC ORPORATE GOVERNANCE  REP ORT   (CONTINU ED)

COMPLIANCE WITH THE UK 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE

Principles of the UK 
Corporate Governance Code

Board leadership 
and company 
purpose

Division of 
responsibilities

Composition, 
succession and 
evaluation

Audit, risk and 
internal control

page 106

page 110

page 113

page 117

Remuneration

page 117

1

2

3

4

5

The UK Corporate Governance Code (the 
‘Code’ or ‘2018 Code’) sets out the 
standards of good practice in relation to 
how a company should be directed and 
governed. easyJet follows the principles set 
out in the Code, the full text of which is 
available at www.frc.org.uk, and is required 
to disclose whether it has complied with 
the provisions of the Code during the 
financial year. The Board is pleased to 
confirm that the Company complied with 
the Code throughout the year. Our 
compliance with key areas of the Code is 
summarised below, together with cross-
references, where applicable, to the 
relevant sections of this report where more 
information can be found. Further details 
are set out in this section of the Annual 
Report (together with the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report on pages 130 to 153 
and the Directors’ Report on pages 154 
to 157). 

1 Board leadership and 
company purpose

Role of the Board
The Board is collectively responsible for 
promoting the long term sustainable success 
of the Group, generating value for 
shareholders as a whole and contributing to 
wider society by fulfilling its purpose. In 
exercising this responsibility, the Board takes 
into account all relevant stakeholders 
including customers, employees, suppliers, 
shareholders, the communities we operate 
in, regulators and governments, and the 
effect of the activities of the Group on the 
environment. Further details are set out on 
pages 26 to 37. 

The Board provides effective leadership by 
setting the strategic priorities of the Group 
and overseeing management’s execution of 
the strategy in a way that enables 
sustainable long term growth, while 
maintaining a balanced approach to risk 
within a framework of prudent and effective 
controls. Further information on easyJet’s 
principal risks and uncertainties is set out 
on pages 78 to 95.

Our purpose
easyJet is a low-cost point to point airline 
that provides considerable choice and 
affordability for travel across a market 
leading European network. The Board 
considers easyJet’s purpose as providing this 
vital connectivity and in a way that is easy, 
enjoyable and affordable – described as 
“seamlessly connecting Europe with the 
warmest welcome in the sky”. 

Air travel provides connectivity on a national, 
regional and international scale, enabling 
personal connections and economic growth 
and development. This connectivity is 
important for wider society for a number of 
reasons. It facilitates travel for leisure, such 
as holidays and tourism and reuniting family 
for important events. It also allows travel for 
business, providing connectivity between 
workplaces and allowing business 
relationships and networks to be built.

While the pandemic has accelerated the use 
of virtual technologies, physical travel will 
remain an important part of the global 
economic recovery. 

Further information on the way that easyJet 
uses its resources to fulfil this purpose and 
create sustainable value is set out in our 
business model on page 12.

Our culture and values
The Board understands easyJet’s unique 
culture, which is open, engaging, positive 
and collaborative, and seeks to ensure 
these values are integrated into its 
decision making and that the policies and 
procedures put in place maintain this 
culture. Where policies, practices or 
behaviour are not aligned with the 
Company’s purpose, values or strategy, the 
Board and management seek to ensure 
that appropriate action is taken.

The culture is underpinned by the values 
and behaviours which we call ‘Our Promise’: 

•  Safe and responsible: safety is our 

number one priority 

•  On our customers’ side: we always think 
about the customer and see things from 
their point of view 

•  In it together: we are one team and work 

together in all we do 

•  Always efficient: we will always be 

efficient and focus on what matters most 
•  Forward-thinking: we anticipate what we 
need tomorrow and consider how what 
we do today might affect us in future.

During the year, the Board used a number 
of methods to understand and monitor the 
Company’s culture:

•  Health and safety – easyJet has a safety 
policy that promotes a ‘just culture’ within 
the airline, to ensure that any incidents 
are openly reported without negative 
repercussions for individuals. The Board’s 
Safety Committee regularly reviews 
internal and external safety incidents 
(including near misses) and risks to 
ensure appropriate mitigations are in 
place and any trends identified, which are 
then reported to the Board.

106 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

•  Employee engagement – As explained 

further on page 109, the Board 
considered and approved a revised 
approach to its workforce engagement 
mechanism in the year. Four Non-
Executive Directors were selected as 
Employee Representative Directors to 
ensure the employee voice is broadly 
reflected in the boardroom. The 
Employee Representative Directors 
update the Board regularly on their 
discussions and the key themes raised. 
Employee surveys carried out throughout 
the year also help identify key areas 
where employees feel that the reality 
diverges from the stated culture.

•  Whistleblowing – The ‘Speak Up, Speak 

Out’ (SUSO) whistleblowing arrangements 
ensure that incidents can be openly 
reported and areas of concern addressed, 
monitored and mitigated as required. The 
Audit Committee regularly reviews 
reports on the operation and efficacy of 
the SUSO policy and updates the Board, 
who considers incidents and their 
outcome, on an anonymous basis, in line 
with the Code. Whistleblowing featured 
regularly on the Board’s agenda during 
2021 through Audit Committee updates 
reporting on significant matters, which 
allowed the Board to regularly review the 
adequacy of the Whistlebowing policy in 
line with its requirement to do so under 
the Code. During the year the Board 
supported the refreshing and republishing 
of the SUSO arrangements.
•  Compliance with policies and 

procedures – The Board approves and 
monitors the effectiveness of a number 
of policies to ensure compliance with the 
regulatory requirements, for example in 
relation to Modern Slavery, Digital Safety 
(including data protection and cyber 
security), Diversity and Inclusion. 
Mandatory training modules, which were 
refreshed during the year and all 
employees required to complete, ensure 
that employees are up to date on key 
policies around anti-bribery and 
corruption, anti-fraud, competition law, 
digital safety, data protection and 
modern slavery.

Investing in and rewarding the 
workforce
We invest in training and developing our 
workforce as set out on pages 56 to 57, and 
page 63. We also facilitate participation in 
share schemes as set out on page 150. 

Engagement with stakeholders
Details of the engagement with all 
stakeholders, including customers, 
employees, communities, suppliers, 
regulators and shareholders, are set out 
on pages 26 to 37. Additional information 
is set out below.

Shareholders
Understanding the views of our shareholders, 
and acting fairly between them, has been a 
priority for the Board during the year. The 
Chairman, CEO and CFO have updated the 
Board on the opinions of investors regularly 
and the views of shareholders and market 
perceptions are also communicated to the 
Board via presentations from the Director 
of Investor Relations at least every quarter 
and engagement with the brokers and 
other advisers.

Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting (AGM) allows 
shareholders the opportunity to 
communicate directly with the Board and 
encourages their participation. Shareholders 
are given the opportunity to raise issues 
formally at the AGM or informally with 
Directors after the meeting. All Directors 
attend the AGM where possible and the 
Chairs of the Committees are available to 
answer questions. 

The Company’s 2021 AGM was brought 
forward to 23 December 2020 to provide 
shareholders with an opportunity to engage 
with the Board prior to the end of the Brexit 
transition period on 31 December 2020 and 
to notify them of the actions easyJet needed 
to take to continue to comply with European 
ownership and control requirements. 

Due to restrictions imposed by the 
Government as a result of the pandemic, 
shareholders were unable to attend the AGM 
in person. The Company put in place 
arrangements for shareholders to vote at the 
AGM electronically and to attend by 
conference call to listen to the business of 
the meeting and ask questions in real time. 
Alternatively, shareholders were able to 
submit questions in advance of the AGM.

While the resolutions relating to the 
appointment and re-appointment of all of 
the Directors were passed with the 
necessary majority, they received less than 
58% in favour. As the Board noted when 
publishing the AGM results, this voting 
outcome was predominantly the result of the 
Company’s largest shareholder (and its 
related parties) (at the time being the 
holders of 28.7% of the issued share capital 
of the Company) voting against these 
resolutions. The views of the Company’s 
largest shareholder and their reasons for 
voting against the resolutions relate primarily 
to the Company’s fleet strategy, are 
well-known to the Board and the Company’s 
other shareholders and have been well 
publicised. The Board has continued to 
engage with the Company’s largest 
shareholder since the AGM and 
throughout the year.

A circular for the Company’s next AGM, 
comprising a letter from the Chairman, 
Notice of Meeting and explanatory notes 
on the resolutions proposed, will be issued 
separately at the appropriate time and will 
also be published on easyJet’s corporate 
website at https://corporate.easyjet.com/
investors.

Investor engagement during  
the year

October 2020
Trading update for year ending 30 
September 2020

November 2020
Full Year Results

December 2020
Discussions with investors and 
advisory bodies ahead of AGM

January 2021
First quarter trading update

February 2021
Bond issuance

April 2021
Trading update for six months to 
31 March 2021

Discussions on remuneration 
proposals

May 2021
Half Year Results

July 2021
Third quarter trading update

September 2021
Fully underwritten rights issue

www.easyJet.com

107

GOVERNANCEC ORPORATE GOVERNANCE  REP ORT   (CONTINU ED)

Stakeholders as part of decision 
making – the rights issue

•  The ability to use the proceeds to 
invest in the customer proposition 
and take advantage of growth 
opportunities, and strengthening the 
ability to continue to invest in 
sustainability, was also considered to 
be important for customers. 

•  Additionally, providing resilience and 
certainty was felt to be important for 
employees, many of whom are also 
shareholders.

Outside of the specific events 
highlighted above, the Group actively 
engages with investors and seeks their 
feedback. easyJet has an Investor 
Relations function which runs an active 
programme of engagement with actual 
and potential investors based on the 
financial reporting calendar as set out 
on the timeline on page 107. This year 
the programme has included one-to-
one meetings with institutional 
investors, roadshows and conferences. 

easyJet has particularly targeted  
and engaged with European investors 
during the year as part of an enhanced 
programme related to 
disenfranchisement. There is also 
regular communication with institutional 
investors on key business issues.

Decision: Launching a 31 for 47 rights 
issue in September 2021 to raise gross 
proceeds of £1.2 billion. 

Considerations: The Board considered 
a number of factors when looking at 
launching an equity raise during the 
year, including the best interests of 
customers, employees and investors, 
amongst other stakeholders. 

•  The Board had acted decisively on 
liquidity during the pandemic to 
ensure that easyJet was well placed 
to navigate through the uncertainty. 
However, as part of a review of its 
capital structure, the Board 
concluded that raising additional 
equity would be necessary.
•  The Board was mindful that 

shareholders had supported the 
Company previously with participation 
in an equity placing, and that the 
quantum of the rights issue would 
require significant investment by 
shareholders. However, it also 
considered that the trading 
environment remained uncertain and 
having reviewed the Group’s long 
term capital and liquidity needs, 
raising the additional equity would not 
only protect the Company’s position 
in the European aviation sector and 
provide resilience from downside 
risks, but also improve management’s 
ability to deliver long term value for 
shareholders. This included through 
having the flexibility to take 
advantage of long term strategic and 
investment opportunities.

•  The Board and its advisers consulted 
with a number of major shareholders 
both shortly before and during the 
proposed rights issue. Discussions 
centred around the timing and how 
the Board had determined the 
quantum of the raise. The rationale 
for the timing was explained, noting 
the above points. The factors that 
influenced the size of the equity raise 
were also discussed. 

•  As a result of this engagement, 
management reflected on the 
feedback received and articulated the 
growth ambitions in their 
presentations around capacity, 
EBITDAR and ROCE.

Remuneration policy 
easyJet consulted with a number of major 
shareholders on its Directors’ remuneration 
policy prior to the formal approval at the 
AGM. Engagement has also taken place 
during the year in relation to the 
performance targets that will apply to the 
2020 LTIP awards, and on our approach to 
executive remuneration in advance of any 
revised remuneration policy being put to 
the next AGM.

Employee Representative Directors
Andreas Bierwirth, Catherine Bradley CBE, 
Nick Leeder and Moni Mannings are the 
Employee Representative Directors, who 
are tasked with engaging with the 
workforce in accordance with the Code. 
Further information is set out on page 109.

108 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Stakeholders in the boardroom – employee voice

At easyJet, we have a wide workforce of 
over 13,000 employees across nine 
countries in Europe, including 4,000 pilots 
and 7,000 cabin crew. Our people are key 
to the Company’s success, and the 
uncertainties brought by the pandemic 
means that engagement with them has 
never been so important. 

Following the Code recommendation that 
boards have a specific method for 
engaging with the workforce, Moya Greene 
was appointed the Board’s Employee 
Representative Director in January 2019. 
When Moya stepped down from the Board 
in December 2020, the Board took the 
opportunity to review the approach and 
consider if there was a way to enhance the 
engagement mechanism using the skills, 
expertise and geographic spread of more 
of the current Board members. 

The Nominations Committee reviewed the 
available options, including the choices set 
out in the Code. Given the geographic 
spread of easyJet’s employees, and the 
nature of their working arrangements (with 
crew, pilots and M&A populations working 
different shift patterns), it was felt that 
having more than one Director engaging 
with the workforce would increase the 
Board’s visibility among employees and 
ensure that the views of employees were 
captured more effectively. The 
Nominations Committee therefore 
recommended to the Board that four 
Directors be nominated to engage directly 
with the workforce, to be known as 
Employee Representative Directors. 

The Board considered this proposed 
approach and agreed that four Non-
Executive Directors serve as Employee 
Representative Directors. The new 
structure was implemented from May 2021 
and Andreas Bierwirth, Moni Mannings, 
Nick Leeder and Catherine Bradley were 
nominated to serve as the first Employee 
Representative Directors. They were 
selected by the Board due to their 
experience, geographic location and 
language skills. For biographical information 
on these Board members, please see 
pages 98 to 100.

The Employee Representative Directors are 
expected to meet individually with the 
Company’s European Works Council 
(‘EWC’) and Management & Administration 
Consultative Group (‘MACG’) at least once 
a year, and other Works Councils on a 
periodic basis. In addition, other more 
informal engagement is envisaged, 
including informal employee gatherings in 
geographic locations or relevant functional 
groupings. When interacting with 
representative groups, the Employee 
Representative Directors are free to 
consider the most appropriate combination 
of engagement mechanisms to ensure 
inclusivity and encourage an open 
exchange. 

A standing agenda item allows the 
Employee Representative Directors to 
report to the Board regularly on their 
discussions, and they are encouraged  
to bring the employee voice into 

conversations in the boardroom 
whenever possible. 

It is important to note that our employees 
continue to be able to raise any concerns 
confidentially, should they wish to do so, 
using easyJet’s whistleblowing (‘Speak Up, 
Speak Out’) arrangements.

During the period from May to September 
2021, Moni Mannings met with the MACG 
group and Catherine Bradley met with  
the Spanish Works Council. The themes 
raised in these meetings were shared with 
the Board at their subsequent Board 
meeting and reflected the impact  
of the prior 18 months on both groups. 
The Board acknowledged the challenges 
employees have faced over that time and 
the resilience they demonstrated during 
the year. The Board noted that the 
experience of employees was not uniform 
across the workforce, with some 
employees having been furloughed for a 
significant part of the year and others 
working long hours mostly from home to 
deal with the numerous challenges the 
business faced. It discussed the impact on 
employees as well as opportunities to 
address this and some of the concerns that 
had been raised. It also discussed the fact 
that employees were perhaps not as 
familiar with the Board or its purpose, and 
agreed it would look to address this in the 
coming year.

For further details on our engagement with 
employees please refer to page 28.

Stakeholders outside of the boardroom – base visit

An understanding of, and connection with, 
easyJet’s business are fundamental for our 
Non-Executive Directors to enable them to 
maximise their contribution to Board 
discussion and understand our 
stakeholders. With this in mind, we aim to 
take the Board to visit one of our European 
operations at least once a year. These visits 
increase the visibility of the Board and 
provide our Non-Executive Directors with a 
valuable opportunity to engage with local 
management and crew, and gain insight 
into how the culture and values of the 
business are translated into day-to-day 
operations. 

The Board’s ability to undertake an 
overseas base visit during the year was 
impacted by the continued travel 

restrictions. However in September 2021 
the Board was able to visit easyJet’s 
operations at London Gatwick, which is the 
Company’s largest base. The Board toured 
some of the customer areas to understand 
the key points on a customer’s journey 
through the airport, and had an opportunity 
to meet with local base staff and find out 
how they had navigated through the 
challenges of the pandemic. 

The Board also had the opportunity  
to hear first-hand from external 
stakeholders by meeting with the executive 
management of Gatwick Airport. This 
allowed them to gain a deeper 
understanding of how Gatwick works with 
easyJet to drive commercial benefit. 
Particular emphasis was placed on ways to 

stimulate a faster traffic recovery post-
pandemic, and how Gatwick can help 
support easyJet’s business model of best in 
class cost and efficiency when operating at 
highly constrained airports. 

The Board welcomed the opportunity  
to meet and discuss easyJet’s progress and 
strategic priorities with the executive and 
local management. The visit also proved 
helpful for the new Board members to 
better understand easyJet’s operation and 
views of the local external stakeholders.

Additional details of the engagement with 
stakeholders during the year, and the s172 
statement, are set out on pages 26 to 37.

www.easyJet.com

109

GOVERNANCEC ORPORATE GOVERNANCE  REP ORT   (CONTINU ED)

2 Division of  

responsibilities

Independence
The Board comprised 10 Directors at the 
year-end: two Executive Directors and 
eight Non-Executive Directors. Over half of 
our Board (excluding the Chairman) are 
deemed Independent Non-Executive 
Directors and the composition of all Board 
Committees complies with the Code. 
Additionally, the Chairman and Chair 
Designate were considered independent 
on their appointment. More information 
about the Board members is available on 
pages 98 to 101. 

The independence of the Non-Executive 
Directors is considered by the Board and 
reviewed on an annual basis, as part of the 
Board effectiveness review. The Board 
considers factors such as length of tenure 
and relationships or circumstances that are 
likely to affect, or appear to affect, the 
Directors’ judgement, in determining 
whether they remain independent. 
Non-Executive Directors do not participate 
in any of the Group’s share option or 
bonus schemes. 

Following this year’s Board effectiveness 
review, the Board concluded that all of the 
Non-Executive Directors continue to remain 
independent in character and judgement 
and are free from any business or other 
relationships that could materially affect 
the exercise of their judgement. The Board 
and Nominations Committee also review 
Committee membership annually to 
ensure that undue reliance is not placed 
on any individual. 

Roles and responsibilities
The Board has a formal schedule of 
matters reserved for its decision. Certain 
governance responsibilities have been 
delegated by the Board to Board 
Committees, to ensure that there is 
independent oversight of internal control 
and risk management and to assist the 
Board with carrying out its responsibilities. 
The Board Committees comprise 
Independent Non-Executive Directors and, 
in some cases, the Chairman. Each 
individual Committee’s Chair reports to the 
Board on matters discussed at Committee 
meetings and highlights any significant 
issue that requires Board attention. For a 
summary of the roles of each Committee, 
see the governance framework on 
page 105. The matters reserved for the 
Board and the terms of reference of the 
Board Committees are available in the 
Governance section of easyJet’s corporate 
website at https://corporate.easyjet.com.  

The roles of Chairman and Chief Executive 
are set out in writing, clearly defined and 
approved by the Board. These are also 
available on easyJet’s corporate website 
at https://corporate.easyjet.com. Day-to-
day management responsibility rests with 
the Airline Management Board (‘AMB’), the 
members of which are listed on pages 
102 to 104.

Chairman
The Chairman, John Barton, is responsible 
for leadership of the Board and ensuring 
effectiveness in all aspects of its role. He is 
responsible for setting the Board’s agenda 
and ensuring adequate time is available for 
discussion of all agenda items, including 
strategic issues. He is responsible for 
encouraging and facilitating active 
engagement by and between all Directors, 
ensuring a culture of openness is 
maintained and drawing on each of their 
extensive skills, knowledge and experience. 
Stephen Hester will assume the role of 
Chairman on 1 December 2021, at which 
point John will step down from the Board. 

Senior Independent Director
The Senior Independent Director, Julie 
Southern, acts as a sounding board for the 
Chairman and acts as an intermediary for 
the other Directors when necessary. She is 
also available to address shareholders’ 
concerns that have not been resolved 
through the normal channels of 
communication with the Chairman, Chief 
Executive or Chief Financial Officer. She is 
responsible for evaluating the performance 
of the Chairman in consultation with the 
other Non-Executive Directors. 

Non-Executive Directors
The Non-Executive Directors provide an 
external perspective, sound judgement and 
objectivity to the Board’s deliberations and 
decision making. With their diverse range 
of skills and expertise, they support and 
constructively challenge the Executive 
Directors and monitor and scrutinise the 
Group’s performance against agreed goals 
and objectives. The Non-Executive 
Directors are also responsible for 
determining appropriate levels of executive 
remuneration, appointing and removing 
Executive Directors, and succession 
planning through their membership of 
the Remuneration and Nominations 
Committees. The Non-Executive 
Directors together with the Chairman 
meet regularly without any Executive 
Directors being present. 

Chief Executive Officer
Johan Lundgren, as Chief Executive Officer, 
has specific responsibility for recommending 
the Group’s strategy to the Board and for 
delivering the strategy once approved. In 
undertaking such responsibilities, the Chief 
Executive Officer takes advice from, and is 
provided with support by, his senior 
management team and all Board 
colleagues. Together with the Chief 
Financial Officer, the Chief Executive 
Officer monitors the Group’s operating and 
financial results and directs the day-to-day 
business of the Group. The Chief Executive 
Officer is also responsible for recruitment, 
leadership and development of the Group’s 
executive management team below 
Board level.

Company Secretary
The Company Secretary, Maaike de Bie, 
supports and works closely with the 
Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and 
the Chairs of the Board Committees in 
setting agendas for meetings of the Board 
and its Committees. She supports the 
provision of accurate, timely and clear 
information flows to and from the Board 
and the Board Committees, and between 
Directors and senior management in order 
to ensure that the Board has the 
information and resources it needs in order 
to function effectively. In addition, she 
supports the Chairman in designing and 
delivering Directors’ induction programmes 
and the Board and Committee 
performance evaluations. She also advises 
the Board on corporate governance 
matters and Board procedures, and is 
responsible for administering the Share 
Dealing Code and the AGM. 

The appointment and removal of the 
Company Secretary is a matter requiring 
Board approval.

Board meetings in 2021
The Board meets regularly and held 17 
meetings during the year, including two 
strategy sessions in October and May. It is 
standard practice that each regular Board 
meeting follows a carefully tailored agenda 
agreed in advance by the Chairman, Chief 
Executive Officer and Company Secretary. 
A typical meeting will comprise reports on 
current trading and financial performance 
from the Chief Executive Officer and Chief 
Financial Officer, legal and governance 
updates, safety and investor relations 
updates and ‘deep dives’ into areas of 
particular strategic importance. A summary 
of the key activities covered during the 
year is set out on page 111. In addition, to 
allow for opportunities for the Board to 
engage with senior management to discuss 
key elements of the business, two Board 
dinners were held. 

110 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

BOARD ACTIVITY IN 2021 

Strategy, Operations, Finance and Risk
•  Held two ‘deep dive’ strategy sessions to discuss the five-year 
plan, capital structure, fleet strategy and areas of strategic 
focus post pandemic

Safety
•  Received and discussed internal and external safety 

related events to ensure appropriate mitigation plans 
are in place

•  Visited London Gatwick and met with employees and 

•  Received updates on protecting employees and 

representatives of Gatwick Airport Limited (see page 109)
•  Considered and approved the proposed network strategy 
•  Considered fleet requirements and approved various 

operational and fleet agreements, including revised delivery 
profiles under the Airbus agreement

•  Received a presentation from management on customers 

and customer service improvement

•  Received regular updates on the Digital Safety Programme
•  Reviewed the Group’s debt capital and funding arrangements 
and approved the entry into a new five-year term loan facility 
of $1.87 billion and issuance of €1.2 billion seven-year bond 
under the Euro Medium Term Note Programme to secure 
adequate liquidity 

•  Considered and approved the launch of the rights issue to 

facilitate and accelerate easyJet’s recovery from the impact 
of Covid-19

•  Discussed the activity around making the cost base more efficient 
•  Received presentations from the Chief Executive Officer and 
Chief Financial Officer and senior management on strategic 
initiatives and trading performance and updates on recent 
developments in the competitive landscape

•  Received and reviewed the status of the Sustainability 

Strategy, related climate change issues and efforts to meet 
TCFD reporting requirements

•  Reviewed and approved the Group’s full-year 2020 and 
half-year 2021 results, as well as its quarterly results 

•  Approved the Group’s 2020 Annual Report including a fair, 

balanced and understandable assessment and validated the 
effectiveness of the Group’s risk management framework and 
internal controls

•  Reviewed the principal risks, emerging risks and uncertainties, 

and consideration of the risk appetite

•  Reviewed and confirmed the Group’s Viability Statement and 

going concern status 

The Strategic and Financial Review explains this in more detail 
on pages 2 to 77. Our Risk Management Framework and 
Principal Risks are set out on pages 78 to 95

customers during the Covid-19 pandemic and easyJet’s 
related industry leading biosecurity measures

•  Received an update on the progress against the 2020 

safety plan and to agree safety, security and 
compliance priorities

•  Received updates from the Chair of the Safety 

Committee on its activities.

Safety is a key priority: read more about how we are 
ensuring this on pages 119 to 120

People
•  Continued to focus on the composition, balance and 

effectiveness of the Board, including the appointment 
of David Robbie and Stephen Hester and related 
Committee changes following the departure of a 
number of Directors

•  Reviewed Directors’ tenure and external commitments 
and composition/membership of Board Committees 
•  Received an update on progress made against easyJet’s 

Diversity and Inclusion strategy 

•  Received an update on succession planning and 

development and update on Talent and Development 
actions 

•  Reviewed the Chairman’s and Non-Executive Directors’ 

fees

•  Held separate Non-Executive Director sessions with the 
Chairman to discuss leadership and other Board matters

•  Considered the evolution of the role of Employee 
Representative Director and agreed to split the 
responsibility amongst more than one Director 

You can read more about this on pages 121 to 123

Governance
•  Received and discussed regular updates on Brexit and 
approved the implementation of the EU ownership 
contingency plan

•  Received reports on engagement with institutional shareholders, 

investors and other stakeholders throughout the year 

•  Conducted an externally facilitated Board evaluation covering 
the Board’s effectiveness, processes and ways of working, 
identifying areas of future focus

•  Received regular reports from the Chairs of the Safety, 

Nominations, Audit, Finance and Remuneration Committees
•  Reviewed and approved the arrangements for the December 
2020 AGM and related arrangements, including the Notice of 
Meeting and amendments proposed to the Articles of Association
•  Approved the Group’s modern slavery statement for publication

To see how we comply with the UK Corporate Governance 
Code please turn to page 106 

Customers

Employees

Suppliers

Shareholders

Community

www.easyJet.com

111

GOVERNANCEC ORPORATE GOVERNANCE  REP ORT   (CONTINU ED)

Attendance at meetings
The Directors’ attendance at the Board and 
Committee meetings held during the year 
are shown in the table below. The Board 
would typically hold 10 scheduled meetings 
during the year, including a strategy day, 
but due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, 
the Board continued to meet on a more 
regular basis and as a result the total 
number of Board meetings held during the 
year was 17. As set out in the table, 
attendance rates remained very high.

The core activities of the Board and its 
Committees are covered in scheduled 
meetings held during the year. Additional 
ad hoc meetings are also held to consider 
and decide matters outside of the 
scheduled meetings. Non-Executive 
Directors are encouraged to communicate 
directly with each other and senior 
management between Board meetings. 

In addition to the meetings set out below, 
five meetings of the Covid Sub-Committee 
(Financing) were held between October 
2020 and March 2021 to review and 
approve various specific Covid related 
financing activities in the period, given the 
Board’s focus on liquidity. The Committee 
comprised John Barton, Catherine Bradley 
CBE, Andrew Findlay (to February 2021), 
Kenton Jarvis (from February 2021), Johan 
Lundgren, Charles Gurassa (until December 
2020) and Julie Southern. It is anticipated 
that the Covid Sub-Committee (Financing) 
will be disbanded as the Board’s activity 
returns to a more normal pattern.

Directors are encouraged and invited to 
attend all Board and Committee meetings, 
but in certain circumstances meetings are 
called at short notice and due to prior 
business commitments and time 
differences Directors may not always be 
able to attend.  

Even if a Director is unable to attend a 
meeting because of exceptional 
circumstances, they continue to receive 
the papers in advance of the meeting and 
have the opportunity to discuss with the 
relevant Chair or the Company Secretary 
any matters on the agenda which they 
wish to raise. Feedback is provided to the 
Directors not able to attend on the 
decisions taken at the meeting. 

In addition, and in line with the Code, the 
Chairman holds meetings with the 
Independent Non-Executive Directors 
without the Executive Directors present. 
There is a standing agenda item at the end 
of each Board meeting for the Independent 
Non-Executive Directors to meet without 
the Executive Directors.

For further information regarding when 
Board members joined or stepped down 
from Committees during the financial year, 
please refer to the ‘Committee changes’ 
sections in the relevant Committee reports 
(pages 118 to 153).

Number of meetings
Executive Directors
Johan Lundgren
Andrew Findlay1
Kenton Jarvis2

Non-Executive Directors
John Barton
Stephen Hester3
Charles Gurassa4
Catherine Bradley CBE
Dr Andreas Bierwirth
Moya Greene DBE4
Dr Anastassia Lauterbach5
Nick Leeder
Moni Mannings
David Robbie6
Julie Southern

Notes:

Board 
(Scheduled)

Board  

(ad hoc)

Audit

Finance

Nominations

Remuneration

Safety

11

11/11
4/4
7/7

11/11
1/1
2/2
11/11
11/11
2/2
2/2
10/11
11/11
10/10
11/11

6

6/6
3/3
3/3

6/6
2/2
1/2
6/6
6/6
2/2
2/2
5/6
5/6
4/4
6/6

5

–
–
–

–
–
–
5/5
–
–
1/1
–
–
4/4
5/5

5

–
–
–

–
–
1/1
5/5
5/5
–
–
–
–
4/4
–

4

–
–
–

4/4
–
1/1
4/4
–
1/1
–
4/4
–
–
4/4

5

–
–
–

–
–
2/2
–
–
2/2
–
–
4/5
3/3
5/5

5

–
–
–

–
–
–
–
5/5
1/1
–
4/5
–
–
5/5

1.  Andrew Findlay stepped down from the Board on 3 February 2021.
2.  Kenton Jarvis joined the Board on 3 February 2021.
3.  Stephen Hester joined the Board on 1 September 2021.
4. Charles Gurassa and Moya Greene DBE stepped down from the Board on 23 December 2020.
5.  Dr Anastassia Lauterbach stepped down from the Board on 21 December 2020.
6.  David Robbie joined the Board on 17 November 2020.

Non-attendance at meetings was due to unavoidable prior commitments and some meetings being called at short notice.

112 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Time commitment and external 
appointments
Following the Board evaluation process, 
detailed further below, the Board has 
considered the individual Directors’ 
attendance, their contribution, and their 
external appointments, and is satisfied that 
each of the Directors is able to allocate 
sufficient time to the Group to discharge 
his or her responsibilities effectively. 

As evidenced by the attendance table 
earlier in this report, the attendance 
remained high and demonstrates the 
Directors’ ability to devote sufficient time.

Contracts and letters of appointment  
with Directors are made available at the 
AGM or upon request. The standard  
terms and conditions of the appointment 
of Non-Executive Directors are also 
available in the Governance section  
of easyJet’s corporate website at  
https://corporate.easyjet.com. 

Executive Directors and the AMB are 
permitted to take up non-executive 
positions on the board of one other listed 
company so long as this is not deemed to 
interfere with the business of the Group. 

In line with the 2018 Code, Directors are 
required to seek Board approval prior to 
taking on any additional significant external 
appointments and the following were 
approved during the year in line with 
this requirement:

•  Catherine Bradley’s appointment as a 

Non-Executive Director of Kingfisher plc 
and Board member of the Value 
Reporting Foundation (formerly the 
International Integrated Reporting 
Council (IIRC)).

•  Moni Mannings’ appointment as a 
Non-Executive Director of Cazoo 
Group Ltd.

•  Johan Lundgren’s appointment as a 

Senior Adviser to Blackstone’s private 
equity group, advising on existing and 
potential new investments.

Prior to these appointments, the Board 
considered the time required, including 
whether they would impact their ability to 
devote sufficient time to their current role. 
The Board considered that the 
appointments, and related arrangements to 
manage conflicts of interest, would not 
interfere with their roles with the Company.

Information and support
All members of the Board are supplied with 
appropriate, clear and accurate information 
in a timely manner covering matters which 
are to be considered at forthcoming Board 
or Committee meetings. The papers for 
each meeting are made available via an 
electronic Board portal along with a wealth 
of supporting and reference material. 

Directors have direct access to the advice 
and services of the Company Secretary, 
who is responsible for advising the Board 
on all governance matters and ensuring 
that Board procedures are complied with. 
Where Directors deem it necessary to seek 
independent legal advice about the 
performance of their duties with the Group, 
they are entitled to do so at the Group’s 
expense.

3 Composition, succession 

and evaluation

The Nominations Committee leads the 
process for Board appointments and 
makes recommendations to the Board. 
The activities of the Nominations 
Committee and a description of the 
Board’s policy on diversity and inclusion are 
on pages 121 to 123.

Appointments to the Board
The Board has processes in place to 
appoint Non-Executive Directors who can 
apply their wider business skills, knowledge 
and experience to the oversight of the 
Group, and provide input and challenge in 
the boardroom to assist in the 
development and execution of the Board’s 
strategy. Similarly, Executive Director 
appointments are made to ensure the 
effective formulation and implementation 
of the Group’s strategy. 

The Nominations Committee, on behalf  
of the Board, reviews the skills of Board 
members at least annually, identifying  
any areas of skills, experience and 
knowledge that can be strengthened 
further. All Director appointments are made 
by the Board and are subject to a formal, 
rigorous and transparent process. 

A number of changes were made to the 
composition of the Board and its 
Committees during the year. In making 
these changes, the Nominations 
Committee and Board took into account 
various considerations including Board 
diversity, independence and the 
combination of skills, knowledge and 
experience of the Directors: 

•  David Robbie was appointed as 

Non-Executive Director on 17 November 
2020. David possesses in-depth 
international experience and brings a 
diverse mix of skills to the Board. 

•  Dr Anastassia Lauterbach stepped down 
from the Board on 21 December 2020. 
•  Moya Greene DBE and Charles Gurassa 
both stepped down from the Board at 
the Company’s AGM in December 2020 
after serving for three and nine years 
respectively.

•  Kenton Jarvis joined the Board and 

succeeded Andrew Findlay as the Chief 
Financial Officer on 3 February 2021. 
Kenton brings vast industry experience 
and highly relevant skills to the role. 

•  Following a comprehensive search 

process Stephen Hester was appointed 
as Non-Executive Director and Chair 
Designate on 1 September 2021. Stephen 
will succeed John Barton as a Chair on 
1 December 2021, at which point John 
will step down from the Board after 
nearly nine years as Chairman.

Details of the induction programmes for 
the new Directors are set out on page 114.

The Board plans to continue to execute 
against its succession plans as the 
longer-serving members step down and it 
is anticipated that there will be further 
changes to the Board in the coming year.

Election and re-election
All Board appointments are subject to 
continued satisfactory performance 
following the Board’s annual effectiveness 
review. The Company’s Articles of 
Association require the Directors to submit 
themselves for election or re-election by 
shareholders at every AGM. All continuing 
Executive and Non-Executive Directors will 
stand for election or re-election at the 
Company’s next AGM.

Tenure
The lengths of tenure of the Chairman and 
Non-Executive Directors at 30 September 
2021 are set out on page 101.

Development
On joining the Board, it is the responsibility 
of the Chairman to ensure that all newly 
appointed Directors receive a full, formal 
and tailored induction, which is organised 
by the Company Secretary. The induction 
programme covers a range of key areas of 
the business including, amongst other 
things, the business and functions of the 
Group, their legal and regulatory 
responsibilities as Directors, briefings and 
presentations from relevant executives, and 
opportunities to visit and experience 
easyJet’s business operations. Details of 
the Board induction programme provided 
for David Robbie, Stephen Hester and 
Kenton Jarvis are set out on page 114.

Directors’ training and development needs 
are of key importance in order to discharge 
their duties effectively and opportunities 
are made available for them to update their 
skills and knowledge. Directors are 
encouraged to highlight specific areas 
where they feel their skills or knowledge 
would benefit from further development as 
part of the annual Board evaluation 
process. Training opportunities are 
provided through internal meetings, 
workshops, presentations and briefings by 
internal advisers and business heads, as 
well as external advisers.

www.easyJet.com

113

GOVERNANCEC ORPORATE GOVERNANCE  REP ORT   (CONTINU ED)

Director induction programme 2021

David Robbie, Kenton Jarvis and 
Stephen Hester, who were appointed 
during the year, followed a tailored 
induction programme covering a range 
of key areas of the business, a sample 
of which is given below. They were 
provided with a Board induction pack 
containing Company and Board 
information to assist with building an 
understanding of the nature of the 
Group, its business, markets and people, 
and to provide an understanding of the 
Group’s main relationships. The pack 
also included information to help 
facilitate a thorough understanding of 
the role of a Director and the 
framework within which the Board 
operates. In addition, they met with key 
colleagues across the business and 
were provided with a briefing pack 
before each session to better 
understand the areas of the business. 
These meetings were tailored to the 
nature of the role that they would be 
undertaking. For example in addition to 
the meetings set out in this section, 
Stephen Hester met with all of the 
Board and AMB on an individual basis, 
as well as an expanded group of 
easyJet colleagues including the 
Director of Governmental Affairs, Chief 
Pilot and Director of Cabin Services, 
amongst others. Stephen also attended 
a meeting of the Leadership 50, 
comprised of the senior leaders across 
the organisation.

Safety and operations
•  Attended a session hosted by the 
Director of Safety, Security and 
Compliance which included briefings 
on the regulatory framework, safety 
management system, AOC 
structures, safety governance, 

compliance monitoring and current 
risks and priorities 

•  Met with the Chief Operating Officer 
to discuss Summer 21 Readiness 
programme framework, cost 
efficiency programme in relation to 
costs, fleet profile and customer 
satisfaction statistics 

Governance, legal and 
remuneration
•  Attended a briefing session with the 
Group People Director and Director 
of Reward to discuss easyJet’s 
approach to reward and our 
remuneration policy

•  Attended a briefing session with the 
Group People Director to discuss 
easyJet’s five-year People Strategy, 
our inclusion and wellness strategy 
and industrial relations landscape

•  Met with the Chair of the 

Remuneration Committee to 
understand the remuneration 
framework and received a brief 
introduction to the work of the 
Remuneration Committee

•  Met with the Group General Counsel 
and Company Secretary to discuss 
and understand the Board and 
Committee procedures, compliance 
with the Market Abuse Regulations, 
legal risk, EU261 and our digital safety 
programme, amongst other matters

Finance and audit
•  Attended briefing sessions on 

easyJet’s trading performance, the 
2021 financial year budget, cash burn, 
liquidity forecast, cost efficiency 
programme and financial controls 
with the Director of Financial Planning 
& Analysis

•  Attended a briefing session with the 

Director of Risk & Assurance to 
understand easyJet’s Enterprise Risk 
Management Framework and internal 
audit structure 

•  Met with the Chair of the Audit 

Committee to understand the role of 
the Committee

Board and senior management
•  Met separately with the Chairman 

and Senior Independent Director to 
understand the role of the Board and 
the individual contribution required

•  Met separately with the Chief 

Executive Officer and other key 
members of the Airline Management 
Board, including the Chief 
Commercial Officer, Chief Operating 
Officer, Group Markets and Marketing 
Director and Chief Data and 
Information Officer

Business and functions
•  Met with the Director of Airport 
Development & Procurement to 
understand the relationships with 
airports and status of our largest 
bases

•  Met with the Director of Investor 

Relations to understand relationships 
with major shareholders and the 
market environment

•  Met with the Director of Treasury to 

understand easyJet’s capital structure 
and funding obligations

•  Met with the Strategy Director to gain 
a deeper understanding of easyJet’s 
five-year plan and fleet overview
•  Met with the Company’s brokers to 
understand easyJet from a market 
and broker’s perspective

114 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Board evaluation

2020 – internal evaluation
Given the Board’s activities during 2019/20 were dominated by reacting to the unique challenges posed by the pandemic, a shorter and 
more targeted evaluation was undertaken, seeking feedback from Board members on how they felt the Board had collectively 
responded to these challenges and how it should evolve its approach in future.

The unprecedented nature of the Board’s activity in the year was noted, including the volume of meetings and the related impact on the 
Board and management’s workloads. The key areas identified for increased focus and development during the 2020 financial year were 
as set out below.

Areas of focus identified

Areas 

Actions taken 

Succession planning – continued 
focus on succession planning for 
Board and senior management, to 
ensure that the Board are satisfied 
that appropriate plans are in place

The Nominations Committee and Board continued to treat this as a priority during the 
year. Four Directors have stepped down from the Board (Charles Gurassa, Moya Greene, 
Anastassia Lauterbach and Andrew Findlay) and three new Directors were appointed 
(David Robbie, Kenton Jarvis and Stephen Hester) during the year. The Nominations 
Committee reviewed the composition and skills of the Board prior to these appointments 
and will continue to keep Board and senior management succession under review when 
Stephen Hester succeeds John Barton as chair.

Strategic oversight – the Board 
would need to focus on the 
strategy of the business post the 
pandemic and ensuring the 
business was well placed to deliver 
a strong recovery

Building relationships – Whilst 
participating in remote meetings 
had worked well, it would be 
important for the Board and 
management to resume meeting 
in person when circumstances 
allowed, to help continue to build 
relationships particularly for the 
new members of the Board

The Board held two deep dive strategy sessions in October 2020 and May 2021, reviewing 
the response to the pandemic and the future strategic direction of the Company, 
including as part of the preparations for the rights issue in September 2021. The Board will 
continue to focus on this in the coming year, led by the incoming Chair.

The Board has held a number of physical meetings where restrictions have allowed, 
including the visit to London Gatwick in September 2021. Members of the AMB attended a 
dinner with the Board at Gatwick, which allowed new Board and new AMB members to 
meet and build relationships. Future meetings and dinners are planned, subject to the 
prevailing restrictions at the time. 

2021 – external performance review
For the 2021 Board performance review, following an RFP process the Board engaged Lorna Parker and Elaine Sullivan of Manchester 
Square Partners (MSP) to conduct an independent evaluation of the performance of the Board and its Committees. easyJet has 
previously worked with a separate division at MSP in relation to professional development activities for the AMB, but as the Board 
performance review was undertaken by a separate team within MSP, who had no experience of or connection to the Company, no 
conflict was deemed to exist. The use of two expert evaluators in Lorna and Elaine was also felt to help bring an independent check and 
balance to the review of the Board and its activities. MSP has no other connection with the Group or individual Directors.

The evaluation was designed in consultation with the outgoing Chair, the Senior Independent Director and the Company Secretary, with a 
focus on how the Board could capitalise on its strengths but evolve to address the needs of the medium term, including the post-
pandemic recovery. Strong emphasis was placed on the role of the Board, composition and succession, culture and values, dynamics 
among Board members and management, and governance and leadership. The process that MSP followed for the review can be found 
on page 116.

www.easyJet.com

115

GOVERNANCEC ORPORATE GOVERNANCE  REP ORT   (CONTINU ED)

•  Held briefing sessions with the outgoing Chair, Senior Independent Director and Company 

Secretary to understand context and priorities 

Preparation 

•  Review of Board and Committee papers for the previous 12 months and other relevant 

documentation, including Strategy papers and the Board Forward Agenda 

•  Individual interviews were scheduled with all of the Non-Executive Directors, the Chair, Company 

Secretary, Group People Director, and one of the Company’s brokers for an external view.

Formal  
interviews

•  Developed a set of comprehensive questions for the interviews and interviews conducted 

with the group identified above.

Board  
observation

•  Observed the Board meeting held at London Gatwick in September 2021 to observe the 

Board dynamics, and also had the opportunity to observe Board’s interaction with 
stakeholders.

Reporting

•  Key findings and recommendations were shared with the outgoing Chair, the incoming Chair, 
the Senior Independent Director and Company Secretary, and a draft report was prepared 
for review.

•  The final report was circulated to the full Board, with a discussion held during a meeting of 

the Board to consider the outcomes and agree recommended actions. 

Findings 
The review concluded that while the prior 18 months had been one of the most demanding and challenging periods the Board had ever 
seen, and despite the number of changes to its membership in that time, the Board had continued to function extremely well and the 
dynamics were good. The Board’s culture was seen as open, collegiate and cohesive, and all Board members were well prepared and 
engaged, which was particularly noteworthy given the increased demands made on their time with the elevated number of Board and 
Committee meetings. It was noted that the Board had been required to shift its focus to shorter term decisions around the balance 
sheet, cost control, and safety, which it had done well. The Board’s effectiveness was felt to be demonstrated through the following:

•  Strong alignment between the members of the Board on its’ role over the medium term in setting the strategy, culture, understanding 

the views of various stakeholders and establishing the right succession plans

•  Clarity and alignment among members on both the strategic priorities for the Company and the associated challenges and risks
•  Having an open, transparent, supportive but appropriately challenging atmosphere and tone
•  A breadth and depth of complementary skills and experience around the Board table
•  Effective, efficient and thorough supporting Board and governance processes

The review also concluded that to build on these strengths and set the Board up for success in future, there would be an opportunity to 
‘reset and restart’ following the pandemic, with an emphasis on moving from short term crisis management to longer term strategy, with 
the Board playing a key role in shaping, debating and testing the ambition, vision and strategy alongside the Executives. The focus areas 
and related actions are set out below.

Areas of focus identified

Area

Actions to be taken 

Exploring opportunities to allow more open-ended 
discussions and collaboration on strategic matters

•  The Board forward agendas will be reviewed to ensure that regular, 
structured and iterative strategy discussions take place throughout 
the year, including one or more dedicated days to discuss strategic 
matters

•  Continued build on the individual briefings on major decisions ahead of 
Board meetings, enabling all Board members to be brought up to the 
same knowledge level and enabling better discussions in the 
boardroom, while also facilitating relationship building

Increasing time spent together, formally and 
informally, to continue to build relationships with 
newer members of the Board and Management, and 
review the evolution of the Board over time

•  In person meetings to be held where possible, with a two day offsite in 

June 2022, ideally overseas at a European base subject to any 
prevailing restrictions. 

•  Regular NED only sessions to continue to be held, including dinners 

where appropriate

•  Other opportunities to increase exposure to management and allow 
for informal time spent together will be identified by the Chair, CEO 
and Company Secretary. 

116 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Rebalancing the Board forward agenda, with a return 
to a more normal forward-looking and strategic 
agenda incorporating forward looking matters, 
including Strategy; Stakeholders (Customers, People, 
Shareholders, Regulators); Sustainability; Brand and 
Marketing; succession, culture, diversity and inclusion

Enhancing discussions around risk and risk appetite 
as the Board looks to the post-pandemic 
recovery phase

Reviewing the remit and membership of the 
Board’s Committees to ensure the Board is 
focused on value add

•  The Board forward agendas to be reviewed to ensure all appropriate 
areas were covered, with input sought from all Board members and 
kept regularly updated. 

•  The governance framework, including terms of reference and 

Committee memberships, will be reviewed to ensure it is optimised for 
the Board’s time to be focused on value add activities

•  Board papers to be made more succinct and better articulate the key 

issues and judgement calls

Continued focus on Board composition and 
succession, with a view to enhancing European and 
aviation experience on the Board 

•  The Nominations Committee to continue to keep the composition, 
skills and experience of the Board under review, and is expected to 
explore the addition of further non-executive directors to the Board 
during the year with European and aviation experience.

Review of the Chairman’s 
performance
As part of the external Board performance 
review, the performance of the Chair was 
also discussed. It was noted that John 
Barton’s contribution had been significant 
both during the year and over the last 
nine years of his tenure, and that he 
demonstrated effective leadership. 
However, with the transition from John 
Barton to Stephen Hester due to take 
place in December 2021, the primary focus 
of the review was how the Board as a 
whole could set itself up for success in 
the future. 

4 Audit, risk and 
internal control

The report of the Audit Committee, 
including details of its composition and 
activities in the year, is set out on pages 
124 to 129. 

Financial and business reporting
The Strategic Report on pages 4 to 95 
explains the Group’s business model and 
the strategy for delivering the objectives of 
the Group. The Statement on Directors’ 
Responsibilities in relation to the Annual 
Report and Accounts being fair, balanced 
and understandable can be found on page 
158 and a statement on the Group as a 
going concern and the viability statement is 
set out on pages 74 to 77.

Risk management
The Board has overall responsibility for 
easyJet’s risk management and systems of 
internal control. The Board has carried out 
a robust assessment of the principal and 
emerging risks facing the Group and how 
those risks affect the prospects of the 
Group. Please refer to pages 78 to 95 for 
further information on the risk 

management process and the Group’s 
principal and emerging risks and 
uncertainties, and pages 76 and 77 for their 
impact on the longer-term viability and 
prospects of the Group. 

Ongoing risk management and assurance 
is provided through the various monitoring 
reviews and reporting mechanisms that are 
embedded in the business operations. The 
results of these reviews are reported to the 
Audit Committee and the Board, which 
consider whether these high-level risks are 
being effectively controlled. 

Regular operational (including safety), 
commercial, financial and IT functional 
meetings are held to review performance 
and to consider key risks and issues (please 
refer to pages 119 and 120 for details of the 
Safety Committee).

Executive management meets regularly to 
consider significant risks, the status of risk 
mitigations and overall business 
performance; this ensures key issues are 
escalated through the management team 
and, if appropriate, ultimately to the Board. 
The Directors review the effectiveness of 
internal controls, including operating, 
financial and compliance controls. 

The Audit Committee undertakes an annual 
review of the appropriateness of the risk 
management processes to ensure that 
they are sufficiently robust to meet the 
needs of the Group (please refer to 
pages 124 to 129 for details of the Audit 
Committee’s responsibilities).

Internal control
The Group’s internal control systems are 
designed to manage, rather than eliminate, 
the risk of failure to achieve business 
objectives. By their nature, they can only 
provide reasonable, not absolute, 
assurance against material misstatement or 
loss. The overall responsibility for easyJet’s 
systems of internal control and for 
reviewing their effectiveness rests with the 
Board. The Board has conducted an annual 
review of the effectiveness of the systems 
of internal control during the year under 
the auspices of the Audit Committee. 
Further information on the Group’s 
internal control systems is set out on 
pages 125 to 129. 

Audit
Details of the Internal Audit function and 
external auditors are provided within this 
report on pages 127 to 129.

5

Remuneration

The responsibility for determining 
remuneration arrangements for the 
Chairman and Executive Directors has been 
delegated to the Remuneration Committee. 
For further information on the Group’s 
compliance with the Code provisions 
relating to remuneration, please refer to  
the Directors’ Remuneration Report on 
pages 130 to 153 for the level and 
components of remuneration, and page 
143 (the Remuneration Committee Report) 
for procedures relating to remuneration.

The Group’s internal control systems 
are designed to manage, rather than 
eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve 
business objectives. 

www.easyJet.com

117

GOVERNANCEC ORPORATE GOVERNANCE  REP ORT   (CONTINU ED)

Board committees
FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

The Committee monitored hedging 
strategies and adapted treasury 
policies in line with prevailing market 
conditions. 
Catherine Bradley CBE
Chair of the Finance Committee

Membership, meetings  
and attendance
•  Catherine Bradley CBE (Chair) 
•  Dr Andreas Bierwirth
•  Charles Gurassa  

(until 23 December 2020)

•  David Robbie  

(from 17 November 2020)

The Committee consists of the 
Independent Non-Executive 
Directors listed above. All members 
of the Committee are Independent 
Non-Executive Directors. Member 
biographies setting out their skills 
and experience can be found on 
pages 98 to 101.

David Robbie became a member of 
the Committee on 17 November 
2020 on joining the Board. Charles 
Gurassa stepped down from the 
Committee and the Board on 
23 December 2020. The Company 
Secretary acts as Secretary to the 
Committee and members of the 
executive management are invited 
to attend meetings. 

The Committee met five times 
during the year. Meeting attendance 
can be found in the table on 
page 112.

The Committee’s terms of  
reference can be found on  
the Company’s website at  
https://corporate.easyjet.com.

I am pleased to present the Finance 
Committee (the ‘Committee’) report 
covering the work of the Committee for 
the year ended 30 September 2021. 

The Committee’s key role is to review and 
monitor the Group’s treasury policies, 
treasury operations and funding activities 
along with associated risks. It is responsible 
for regulating the treasury activities of the 
Company and controlling the associated 
risks, determining and approving material 
inter-company distributions, and changes to 
share warehousing policies and loan facility 
arrangements. The Committee is also 
responsible for providing approvals in relation 
to hedging, International Swaps and 
Derivatives Association (ISDA) arrangements, 
letters of credit, guarantees in line with the 
delegated authority and the Treasury Policy.

Rapidly changing travel restrictions led to 
easyJet operating a reduced flying 
programme to remain operationally flexible. 
This meant changing our existing hedging 
strategies. The Committee focused on 
ensuring that easyJet’s over-hedged 
exposures were closed and that it was able 
to manage its exposures to minimise 
losses. The key activities of the Committee 
are set out below. There were five meetings 
during the year and after each Committee 
meeting, an update was presented to the 
Board on the key issues discussed during 
our meetings.

Catherine Bradley CBE
Chair of the Finance Committee

Key activities during the year
The Committee continued to monitor both 
the hedging and liquidity policies due to the 
uncertainty in the operating environment. 
The Committee ensured easyJet maintained 
significant levels of liquidity throughout the 
year, as well as making sure all hedging 
positions were being managed appropriately. 
easyJet entered into a number of financing 
arrangements throughout the year, significantly 
increasing its cash balance. To ensure the 
additional cash was invested safely and 
securely, the Committee regularly reviewed 
the counterparty credit limits to make sure 
they were fit for purpose. The Committee 
also undertook a deep dive on easyJet’s carbon 
exposures, which resulted in easyJet updating 
the treasury policy used for purchasing carbon 
allowances in relation to Emissions Trading 
System (ETS) compliance.

easyJet’s Treasury team maintains a risk 
and control matrix, to highlight the key 
areas of risk as well as the mitigating 
controls in place. During the year, the 
Committee received an update on the 
treasury controls environment to ensure it 
remained effective.

The Committee also approved the 
onboarding of two new counterparts 
during the year, for onward 
recommendation for the Board.

The Committee continued to monitor 
activities by receiving regular reports from 
the Treasury function setting out details of 
cash and deposits, hedging positions for 
fuel, foreign exchange and carbon, debt 
maturity, interest rate analysis and 
monitoring of credit ratings, amongst 
other matters.

118 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Board committees
SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT

The Committee’s focus has been on 
ensuring the safety of customers, 
crew and employees remains our 
highest priority. 
Dr Andreas Bierwirth
Chair of the Safety Committee

On behalf of the Board, I am pleased  
to present the Safety Committee 
(the ‘Committee’) report covering the  
work of the Committee for the year ended 
30 September 2021. These pages outline 
how the Committee discharged the 
responsibilities delegated to it by the Board 
over the course of the year, and the key 
topics it considered in doing so.

The Committee is responsible for 
overseeing the Group’s management of 
health, safety, security and regulatory 
compliance in line with the Group’s values 
and commitment. The primary focus of  
the Committee was to oversee the quality 
and effectiveness of easyJet’s safety 
strategies, standards, policies and initiatives, 
together with risk exposures, targets and 
performance, in order to ensure that safety 
consistently receives the highest level of 
Board attention.

The safety of our passengers and 
employees remains our highest priority. The 
global crisis created by the pandemic has 
continued in 2021 due to the uncertainty 
caused by new variants of Covid-19 and 
associated flying restrictions. During the 
year, the Committee was actively engaged 
in overseeing easyJet’s preparations for the 
safe ramp up in flying as volumes returned 
on the relaxation of restrictions. To manage 
safety during this time, we have put risk 
management and management of change 
at the centre of what we do. This approach 
has helped us to ensure we are 
appropriately organised and resourced. 

There were five meetings during the year 
and after each Committee meeting, 
I provided an update to the Board on the 
key issues discussed during our meetings.

Dr Andreas Bierwirth
Chair of the Safety Committee

www.easyJet.com

119

Membership, meetings  
and attendance
•  Dr Andreas Bierwirth (Chair)
•  Moya Greene DBE  

(until 23 December 2020)

•  Nick Leeder 
•  Julie Southern

The Committee consists of the 
Independent Non-Executive 
Directors listed above. Moya Greene 
DBE did not stand for re-election at 
the Company’s AGM and as a result 
stepped down from the Board and 
the Committee on 23 December 
2020. Member biographies can be 
found on pages 98 to 101.

The Committee met five times 
during the year. The Director of 
Safety, Security and Compliance has 
attended all Safety Committee 
meetings during the year. Other key 
invitees include the Chief Operating 
Officer, the Director of Flight 
Operations, Director of Engineering 
& Maintenance and Head of Safety. 
Subject matter experts in flight 
operations, engineering and other 
functions have attended as required.

Meeting attendance can be found in 
the table on page 112.

The Committee’s terms of  
reference can be found on  
the Company’s website at  
https://corporate.easyjet.com.

GOVERNANCEC ORPORATE GOVERNANCE  REP ORT   (CONTINU ED)

Key activities during the year
Whilst the rate of transmission of Covid-19 
decreased from the peaks seen earlier in 
2020, there continued to be new cases of 
infection in many countries leading to 
dynamic and ever changing travel 
restrictions, regulations, guidelines and 
requirements. The Committee remained 
focused on the delivery of a safe and 
secure operation which meets the needs 
and expectations of our customers. 

The Director of Safety, Security and 
Compliance reports regularly reports to the 
Committee and Airline Management Board 
on easyJet’s safety, security and 
compliance standards. He has the right of 
direct access to Dr Andreas Bierwirth as 
Committee Chair and to the Board 
Chairman, which reinforces the 
independence of safety oversight. The 
Committee Chair reports to the Board with 
his own assessment of safety management 
within the airline throughout the year.

During the year the Committee undertook 
a number of significant activities. These 
included an overview of easyJet’s readiness 
for summer 2021, BAU activities, focus 
risks, significant operational changes, 
management system developments, 
security oversight and influencing 
regulators and authorities where and when 
appropriate. The Committee also 
undertook a review of biosecurity 
standards, which include all aircraft having 
industry leading filtration systems, the 
cleaning and disinfecting of aircraft daily, 
and passengers and crew wearing masks 
on board all our flights.

Furthermore, the Committee monitored 
the safety, security and compliance 
priorities including BAU and support 
activities, summer readiness framework 
and risk management framework to ensure 
easyJet remained safe and responsible and 
foundations were in place to thrive through 
the recovery phase. In addition, the 
Committee continued to monitor notable 
incidents to ensure process improvements 
and mitigating actions had been 
undertaken, where necessary. 

The Committee received regular reports 
from the Director of Safety, Security and 
Compliance to ensure the Safety team had 
adequate resources and appropriate 
information to perform its function 
effectively and in accordance with the 
relevant professional standards.

The easyJet Safety Board (ESB), which 
reports to the Airline Management Board, 
supported the role of the Committee in 
ensuring the safety risks and issues are 
identified and prioritised and action plans 
are in place to mitigate any risks. The ESB 
met monthly throughout the year, including 
during the period of lockdown and when 
easyJet operations were scaled back.

Readiness to fly 
The Committee received an update on the 
easyJet’s readiness programme to ensure 
teams were properly resourced with 
defined ways of working, crew remained fit 
and competent for duty, aircrafts returned 
to service and third-party suppliers were 
capable to support operations. The 
readiness programme also covered the 
biosecurity documentation required 
throughout the organisation for smooth 
operations. 

Biosecurity standards
The Committee provided oversight to 
easyJet’s biosecurity standards including 
creation of easyJet’s Biosecurity Standards 
Groups in order to maintain a co-ordinated 
set of biosecurity standards across 
different countries and health authorities’ 
requirements. Due to the implementation 
of clear masks policy and associated 
communications to crew and customers, 
easyJet’s biosecurity performance 
remained satisfactory. 

Safety plan
Another key area of focus was reviewing 
progress against the safety plan covering 
the safety and security development and 
action plans. This included assessment of 
key risks and how easyJet was working 
with the rest of the industry to ensure 
highest safety standards were followed. 

Incident and crisis management
To ensure easyJet is able to respond to an 
incident or crisis quickly, effectively and 
appropriately, the Committee continues to 
monitor the outcome of the crisis 
management exercise undertaken by the 
management. During the year a crisis 
management exercise had been facilitated 
which demonstrated a good understanding 
between different crisis teams and ability 
to respond remotely. 

Operations
The Committee received updates on the 
detailed preparation and delivery of the 
ramp up of the flying programme in 
Summer 2021. The external environment 
continued to remain fluid as lockdown and 
travel restrictions evolved around the 
network. The Committee took note of the 
status of the readiness programme and the 
actions taken to manage suppliers to 
reduce the safety and operational risks 
around the ramp up. The Committee also 
received updates on the improvement of 
the Integrated Management System to 
establish a common approach to Safety, 
Security, Compliance and the Environment 
across the organisation. This will enable us 
to provide safe and responsible journeys 
for our customers and a safe working 
environment for our employees and 
suppliers. 

Looking forward
Over the next year, the Committee will 
continue to monitor and review the safety 
plan which includes operational safety, 
health and safety, operations critical IT 
systems, environmental safety and 
compliance and associated outcomes. 
More generally, we will continue to provide 
support to management on embedding 
the strong safety culture which will ensure 
high standards of safety continue to be 
delivered across the Group and all its 
operating entities.

120 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Board committees
NOMINATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT

The Committee continues to facilitate 
effective succession planning and the 
development of a diverse board. 
John Barton
Chair of the Nominations Committee

Membership, meetings  
and attendance
•  John Barton (Chair)
•  Stephen Hester  

(from 1 September 2021)

•  Moya Greene DBE  

(until 23 December 2020)

•  Charles Gurassa  

(until 23 December 2020)

•  Julie Southern 
•  Catherine Bradley CBE 
•  Nick Leeder

The Committee consists of the 
Independent Non-Executive 
Directors listed above. All members 
of the Committee are Independent 
Non-Executive Directors. Member 
biographies can be found on pages 
98 to 101.

The Chairman of the Board acts as 
Chair of the Committee with 
members of the executive 
management invited to attend 
meetings. The Company Secretary 
acts as Secretary to the Committee.

The Committee met four times in 
the year. Meeting attendance can be 
found in the table on page 112.

The Committee’s terms of  
reference can be found on  
the Company’s website at  
https://corporate.easyjet.com.

I am pleased to present the Nominations 
Committee (the ‘Committee’) report on the 
progress made during 2021.

The main purpose of the Committee is to 
ensure plans are in place for orderly 
succession of Board and senior 
management positions whilst maintaining 
an appropriate balance of skills, experience, 
independence and diversity. The 
Committee regularly reviews the structure, 
size and composition of the Board and 
makes recommendation to the Board with 
regard to any changes. 

There were four meetings during the year 
and after each Committee meeting, I 
provided an update to the Board on the 
key issues discussed during our meetings.

There have been a number of changes to 
the Board and its Committees during the year. 
The Committee oversaw the appointment 
process which resulted in the appointment 
of David Robbie with effect from 17 
November 2020. Dr Anastassia Lauterbach 
stepped down from the Board with effect 
from 21 December 2020. Charles Gurassa 
and Moya Greene DBE stepped down from 
the Board on 23 December 2020 following 
the AGM after serving nine and three years 
on the Board respectively. 

As reported earlier and in accordance with 
best practice under the Code, I will step 
down as the Chairman on 1 December 2021 
after nearly nine years on the Board. 
Following a comprehensive search process 
led by the Nominations Committee, we 
appointed Stephen Hester as Chair 
Designate and Independent Non-Executive 
Director with effect from 1 September 2021. 
He will succeed me as the Chairman on 1 
December 2021. Stephen has brought over 

35 years of wide-ranging experience, a 
strong track record of value creation and 
listed board experience. Stephen will also 
serve on the Committee, which he will chair 
in due course. As the outgoing Chair, I did 
not participate in the search and selection 
process.

With the Board’s succession plans 
underway, the Committee has also 
reviewed succession planning for the Airline 
Management Board and executive 
leadership team during the year. Following 
an independent search facilitated by 
Russell Reynolds we welcomed Kenton 
Jarvis as the Chief Financial Officer with 
effect from 3 February 2021.

Implementation of the annual Board 
evaluation process to assess the 
performance of individual Directors and the 
effectiveness of the Board and its 
Committees is also one of the key 
responsibilities of the Committee. The 
Committee appointed MSP to undertake 
an independent external evaluation process 
during the year. I am pleased to report that 
the Board was deemed to operate 
effectively, and the outcome of the 
evaluation and areas of focus are set out 
further on page 116 to 117.

John Barton
Chair of the Nominations Committee

www.easyJet.com

121

GOVERNANCEC ORPORATE GOVERNANCE  REP ORT   (CONTINU ED)

Chairman succession
Under the Code, nine years is the 
recommended maximum for the Chair to 
serve on the Board. As a result, the 
Committee took the appropriate steps to 
identify potential successors in preparation 
for John Barton’s nine-year tenure coming 
to an end. The process was led by the 
Committee on behalf of the Board and the 
incumbent Chair did not participate. The 
Committee worked with executive search 
consultants, Lygon Group, to refine the role 
description, key attributes sought and 
search profile, which included amongst 
others: substantial prior board experience, 
credibility when representing the business 
to the city and investors, experience of 
business transformation and managing 
cost and capital restructuring, and 
experience managing complex 
stakeholders. Lygon then undertook a 
comprehensive search for prospective 
candidates who met the profile. 

Given the importance of the appointment, 
all Board members were consulted as part 
of the shortlisting process. A number of 
candidates were selected for the shortlist 
and an interview process undertaken by all 
Board members. 

Following the interview process and after 
consideration of the appropriate balance of 
skills, knowledge, experience, independence 
and diversity on the Board, and the 
attributes sought from the new Chair, the 
Committee recommended the 
appointment of Stephen Hester as Chair 
Designate with effect from 1 September 
2021 and for him to succeed John Barton 
on 1 December 2021.

Board Committee membership
To ensure that the Board Committees 
retain the correct balance of skills and 
experience, the Committee monitors overall 
composition and membership. As a result 
of the changes to the Board during the 
year, a number of changes to the 
membership of Board Committees were 
recommended and approved by the Board:

•  David Robbie joined the Finance 

Committee, Audit Committee and 
Remuneration Committee on joining 
the Board in November 2020
•  Dr Anastassia Lauterbach stood 

down from the Audit Committee on 
stepping down from the Board on 
21 December 2020

•  Charles Gurassa stepped down 

from the Nominations Committee, 
Finance Committee and Remuneration 
Committee on stepping down from the 
Board on 23 December 2020

•  Moya Greene stood down from the 

Remuneration Committee, 
Safety Committee and Nominations 
Committee on stepping down from 
the Board on 23 December 2020

•  Stephen Hester joined the Nominations 

Committee with effect from 1 September 
2021 and will Chair the Committee from 
1 December 2021.

Employee Representative 
Directors
During 2021, in order to strengthen the 
employee voice in the boardroom and use 
the opportunity to review the mechanism 
when Moya Greene stepped down, the 
Committee considered the evolution of the 
role of Employee Representative Director, 
recommending that the responsibility be 
shared amongst several Non-Executive 
Directors to utilise their experience and 
geographic location. This recommendation 
was approved by the Board and from  
May 2021, four Non-Executive Directors 
were nominated as Employee 
Representative Directors. Further details 
can be found on page 109. 

Key activities during the year 
Non-Executive Director 
appointment
The Committee had previously identified 
the need for a number of non-executive 
appointments as part of its succession 
plans, and during the year it oversaw the 
process which led to the recommendation 
that David Robbie be appointed as an 
additional Non-Executive Director.

Having identified the desired skills and 
experience sought in the new Directors and 
having due regard to the Board Inclusion 
and Diversity Policy, after a selection 
process the Committee engaged search 
consultants Lygon Group to act on behalf 
of easyJet. Lygon Group do not have any 
other connection with the Company nor 
individual Directors, except where they may 
have liaised with them as prospective 
candidates for other board positions.

The Committee considered a list of 
potential candidates provided by the 
search consultant, and took into account 
the balance of skills, knowledge, 
independence, diversity and experience of 
the Board together with an assessment of 
the time commitment expected.

Following an interview process, a shortlist 
of candidates was discussed by the 
Committee and David’s appointment  
was recommended to the Board. His 
experience further strengthens the diverse 
mix of skills and experience on the Board. 
The Committee oversaw the induction 
programme for David, further details of 
which are set out on page 114.

The Committee continues to review 
membership and composition of the Board 
and it is anticipated that there will be 
further changes in the coming year as it 
continues to execute against its succession 
plans and ensure the mix of skills and 
experience remains appropriate.

Chief Financial Officer
Following the resignation of Andrew 
Findlay in May 2020, the Board 
commenced the search for a new Chief 
Financial Officer. Having identified the 
desired skills and experience sought from 
the new CFO, after a selection process 
search consultants Russell Reynolds were 
appointed to act on behalf of easyJet. 
Russell Reynolds do not have any other 
connection with the Company nor 
individual Directors, except where they may 
have liaised with them as prospective 
candidates for other board positions.

Following an interview and referencing 
process, a shortlist of candidates was 
discussed by the Committee, and Kenton’s 
appointment was subsequently 
recommended to the Board by the 
Committee. 

122 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Succession planning
The Board continues to satisfy itself that 
plans are in place for orderly succession for 
appointments to the Board so that the 
right balance of appropriate skills and 
experience is represented, building on the 
work previously undertaken. During the 
year, the Committee reviewed the balance 
of skills, experience, diversity and 
independence of Board members, to 
ensure appropriate succession plans were 
in place. The Committee also seeks to 
ensure that there are succession plans and 
leadership development plans in place for 
the members of the AMB and ELT, noting 
that further initiatives are planned in 
this area.

Election and re-election 
of Directors
The effectiveness and commitment of 
each of the Non-Executive Directors is 
reviewed annually as part of the Board 
evaluation. The Committee has satisfied 
itself as to the individual skills, relevant 
experience, contributions and time 
commitment of all the Non-Executive 
Directors, taking into account their other 
external appointments and interests held.

The Board is recommending the election or 
re-election of all of the continuing Directors 
at this year’s AGM. Details of the service 
agreements for the Executive Directors and 
letters of appointment for the Non-
Executive Directors, and their availability for 
inspection, are set out in the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report on page 151.

Diversity and inclusion
The Committee and Board are committed 
to ensuring that together the Directors 
possess the requisite diversity of skills, 
experience, knowledge and perspectives to 
support the long-term success of the 
Company. In this regard, the role of 
diversity in promoting balanced and 
considered decision making which aligns 
with the Group’s purpose, values and 
strategy is fully recognised. All Board 
appointments are made on an objective 
and shared understanding of merit, in line 
with required competencies relevant to the 
Company as identified by the Committee, 
and consistent with the Company’s 
Diversity and Inclusion Policy (‘Policy’). 

The Policy covers diversity and inclusion 
across the Company, but in relation to the 
Board it specifically notes that:

•  easyJet recognises the importance of a 
diverse Board, bringing together an 
appropriate mix of skills and experience 
to ensure the future success of our 
business. We understand the richness a 
diverse Board brings in providing the 
range of perspectives, insight and 
challenge needed to support good 
decision making and create a positive 
culture in the organisation.

•  When considering the optimum make-up 

of the Board, all of the aspects of 
diversity will be appropriately reviewed 
and balanced where possible.

•  The diversity of the Board will typically 
be reviewed on an annual basis as part 
of the annual performance evaluation.
•  New appointments to the Board will be 
made on merit, in the context of the 
requirements of the Board at that time. 
The Nominations Committee will identify 
suitable candidates based on merit 
against objective criteria and with due 
regard for the benefits of diversity on  
the Board including social and ethnic 
background, cognitive and personal 
strengths as well as diversity of gender. 
Where there is a known requirement to 
improve the diversity of the Board, the 
Nominations Committee will ask to  
see a higher proportion of candidates 
fitting the diversity criteria. However,  
the final selection will, as stated, always 
be on merit. 

Following the appointment of a new Chair 
and the conclusion of the Board 
performance review, the Committee will be 
reviewing the composition of the Board in 
the coming year with due regard to the 
Company’s Board Diversity and Inclusion 
Policy and taking into account the 
recommendations set out in the Hampton-
Alexander Review (which recommends  
that at least 33% of board and executive 
committee members of FTSE 350 
companies should be female), the 
McGregor-Smith Review and the  
Parker Review (which recommends  
at least one director from an ethnic 
minority background for FTSE 100 
companies by 2021). 

At the start of 2020 the Board had a  
45% female representation, exceeding  
the 33% recommended by the Hampton-
Alexander Review and one Director from 
an ethnic minority background. Following 
the changes to the Board during the year, 
at the year end the female representation 
was 30% (three out of ten). When John 
Barton steps down from the Board on  
1 December 2021 the level of female 
representation will increase to 33%  
(three out of nine). We continue to  
have one Director from an ethnic  
minority background.

The Nominations Committee also oversees 
the development of a diverse pipeline for 
future succession to Board and senior 
management appointments, including 
reviewing the gender balance of senior 
management and its direct reports.  
Where there is a known desire to improve 
diversity at a certain level or in a certain 
function in the organisation, the recruiting 
team will ask to see a higher proportion  
of candidates fitting the diversity criteria. 
However, the final selection will always  
be on merit.

As at 30 September 2021, the AMB  
has 33% female representation, and 
amongst their direct reports female 
representation is 26%.

easyJet’s People team monitors the 
Group’s diversity on at least an annual  
basis and highlights any areas of concern 
to the AMB. The Sustainability section of 
the Annual Report on page 56 reports in 
further detail on the approach being  
taken to diversity and inclusion, and  
the implementation of the policy across  
the Group.

Board evaluation
In line with the Code, the Board conducts 
its annual evaluation exercise via an 
independent external facilitator once every 
three years. The last externally facilitated 
evaluation was conducted in 2018 and 
consequently an external evaluation 
facilitated by Manchester Square Partners 
was conducted during the financial year  
to evaluate the performance of the Board, 
its Committees and the Chairman in line 
with the Committee’s terms of reference. 
Further details can be found on pages  
115 to 117.

www.easyJet.com

123

GOVERNANCEC ORPORATE GOVERNANCE  REP ORT   (CONTINU ED)

Board committees
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Committee continues to monitor 
the integrity of the financial 
information for the benefit of our 
shareholders. 
Julie Southern
Chair of the Audit Committee

Membership, meetings 
and attendance
•  Julie Southern (Chair)
•  Catherine Bradley CBE 
•  Dr Anastassia Lauterbach  
(until 21 December 2020)

•  David Robbie (from 17 November 2020)

The Committee consists of the 
Independent Non-Executive Directors 
listed above. All members of the 
Committee are Independent Non-
Executive Directors. Member biographies 
can be found on pages 98 to 101.

The Board has confirmed that it is 
satisfied that Committee members have 
recent and relevant financial experience 

and offer a depth of financial and 
commercial experience including the 
travel sector in which the Company 
operates. The Board also confirmed that 
Julie Southern has recent and relevant 
financial experience.

David Robbie became a member  
of the Committee with effect from 
17 November 2020 and Dr. Anastassia 
Lauterbach stepped down as a member 
of the Committee on 21 December 2020. 
The Company Secretary acts as 
Secretary to the Committee.

The Committee met five times during  
the year, with members of senior 
management required to attend as and 
when appropriate. Meeting attendance 

can be found on page 112. The 
Committee also met with the internal 
and external auditors and Director of Risk 
and Assurance separately after each 
meeting. In addition, the Committee 
Chair holds regular private sessions with 
the Chief Financial Officer and the senior 
finance team, the Director of Risk and 
Assurance and the external audit team, 
to ensure that open and informal lines of 
communication exist should they wish to 
raise any concerns outside formal 
meetings.

The Committee’s terms of reference can 
be found on the Company’s website at  
https://corporate.easyjet.com.

I am pleased to present the Audit 
Committee (the ‘Committee’) report for the 
year ended 30 September 2021.

grateful for the continued commitment 
and professionalism of the finance team in 
the face of a very heavy workload in 2021.

During the year the Committee continued 
to play a key role in assisting the Board in 
fulfilling its oversight responsibility. 

The Committee oversaw and supported 
the development of financial control 
improvements in light of the Government’s 
proposed audit and governance reforms. 
The Committee also spent time reviewing 
the internal controls over financial reporting 
to ensure that the additional stresses 
imposed by the impact of Covid had been 
properly managed. It was clear that the 
level of flight cancellations and 
amendments continued to drive an 
extraordinary workload in revenue 
management in particular and the 
committee were pleased to see additional 
resources deployed to ensure that we 
could still have confidence in the underlying 
accounting. The Committee are very 

The Committee played a key role in 
providing independent oversight of any 
impacts on the risk management processes 
and internal control frameworks and 
challenging management on the significant 
accounting judgements made as a part of 
our financial reporting and going concern 
statements.

We engaged with the FRC as part of their 
thematic review of climate disclosures 
during the year, responding to questions 
they had on the information set out in our 
2019 Annual Report and Accounts. Further 
details can be found on page 126.

We have considered the processes 
underpinning the production and approval 
of this year’s Annual Report and Accounts, 
and also assessed the viability of the Group 
over a three-year period.

124 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

There were five meetings during the year 
and after each Committee meeting, 
I provided an update to the Board on the 
key issues discussed during our meetings. 
I have also met separately with the external 
audit partner and key management on a 
number of occasions during the year, and 
the Committee met with the external 
auditors after each Committee meeting 
without management present.

Julie Southern
Chair of the Audit Committee

Role of the Committee
The principal roles and responsibilities of the Committee are set out in its terms of reference, and include, but are not limited to:

Financial reporting

•  monitor the integrity of the financial statements of the Company and the Group, preliminary results 

and announcements

•  review the appropriateness and consistency of significant accounting policies 
•  review and report to the Board on significant financial issues and judgements

Internal control  
and risk management

•  carry out a robust assessment of the Group’s emerging and principal risks on an annual basis 
•  review the effectiveness of the Group’s risk management system and the assurance reports from 

management on the internal control and risk management system

Compliance, 
whistleblowing 
and fraud

Internal and 
external audit

•  review the adequacy and security of the Group’s arrangements for employees to raise concerns about 

possible wrongdoing in financial reporting or other matters on behalf of the Board

•  review and approve the role and mandate of Internal Audit, monitor and review the effectiveness of 

its work and carry out a periodic assessment of the effectiveness of the Internal Audit function 
•  consider and make recommendations to the Board, to be put to shareholders for approval at the 
Annual General Meeting (AGM), in relation to the appointment, reappointment and removal of the 
Company’s external auditor

•  oversee the relationship with the external auditor

The Committee’s full terms of reference are approved annually and are available on the Company’s website at https://corporate.easyjet.com.

Key activities during the year
The main areas of Committee activity 
during the 2021 financial year included the 
planning, monitoring, reviewing and 
approval of the following areas:

Financial reporting
•  The integrity of the 2020 full year and 
2021 half year financial statements 
relating to the financial performance and 
governance of the Group, and 
considering the disclosures against the 
FRC guidance on reflecting the impact 
of the pandemic.

•  The material areas in which significant 
judgements were applied, based on 
reports from both the Group’s 
management and the external auditor. 
Further information is provided in the 
Significant judgements section on 
page 127.

•  The information, underlying assumptions 
and stress-test analysis presented in 
support of the Viability Statement and 
Going Concern status

•  The consistency and appropriateness of 

the financial control and reporting 
environment

•  The fair, balanced and understandable 
assessment of the Annual Report and 
Accounts for the 2020 financial year and 
the 2021 half year statement.

•  Engaging with the FRC in relation to 

thematic review of climate disclosures in 
the 2019 Annual Report

•  Reviewing the financial reporting 

processes and disclosures, including the 
non-audit services undertaken by PwC, 
as part of the prospectus for the £1.2 
billion rights issue

Internal financial controls and 
risk management
•  Development of financial control 

improvements as part of the financial 
control framework and a risk 
management framework to provide 
greater clarity to strategic planning and 
investment decisions

•  The adequacy and effectiveness of the 

Group’s ongoing risk management 
systems and control processes, through 
an evaluation of: the risk and assurance 
plans; Internal Audit review reports; risk 
assessments; information and cyber 
security threats; and business continuity 
and control themes

•  The Group’s risk environment, including a 
robust review of the Company’s principal 
risks and uncertainties and including 
appropriate consideration of emerging 
risks 

•  Business integrity measures including the 

‘Speak Up, Speak Out’ process, 
addressing any unethical behaviours, 
overseeing and conducting individual 
investigations into whistleblowing 
concerns

•  Receiving an update on the Company’s 

payroll improvement programme

•  Receiving regular updates on the Group’s 

Digital Safety Programme 

Internal Audit effectiveness and 
review of activities
•  An assessment of the effectiveness and 

independence of the Internal Audit 
function, including consideration of:

•  key Internal Audit reports
•  stakeholder feedback on the quality of 

Internal Audit activity

•  Internal Audit’s compliance with 
prevailing professional standards
•  the implementation of Internal Audit 

recommendations

Relationship with external auditor
•  Reviewed the scope of, and findings 

from, the external audit plan undertaken 
by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (‘PwC’) 
as the external auditor

•  The effectiveness of the external audit 

process

•  The assessment of the performance, 

continued objectivity and independence 
of PwC

•  Ensuring the successful transition to a 
new lead audit partner to help ensure 
PwC’s objectivity and independence
•  Ensuring PwC’s non-audit work on the 
rights issue did not compromise PwC’s 
independence and due process was 
followed

•  The level of fees paid to PwC for 

permitted non-audit services

•  The reappointment of PwC as external 

auditor

•  Compliance, whistleblowing and fraud
•  Reviewing whistleblowing reporting, 
reports on anti-bribery and anti-
corruption procedures, reports on 
procedures for fraud and loss prevention 
and reports on credit card fraud, 
together with monitoring and 
investigations.

www.easyJet.com

125

GOVERNANCEC ORPORATE GOVERNANCE  REP ORT   (CONTINU ED)

Fair, balanced and 
understandable
The Committee assessed and 
recommended to the Board that, taken as 
a whole, the 2021 Annual Report and 
Accounts (which the Board subsequently 
approved) are fair, balanced and 
understandable and provide the necessary 
information for shareholders to assess the 
Group and Company’s position and 
performance, business model and strategy. 
In reaching this conclusion, the Committee 
considered the overall review and 
confirmation process around the Annual 
Report and Accounts, including:

•  the input of subject matter experts, the 

AMB and other senior management and, 
where applicable, the Board and its 
Committees

•  the processes and controls which 
underpin the overall review and 
confirmation process, including the 
preparation, control process, verification 
of content, and consistency of 
information being carried out by internal 
financial controls specialists

•  review of the Annual Report and 

Accounts held by senior management 
and other Subject Matter Experts to 
focus solely on the reporting being fair, 
balanced and understandable.

The Committee was provided with, and 
commented on, a draft copy of the Annual 
Report and Accounts.

In carrying out the above processes, key 
considerations included ensuring that there 
was consistency between the financial 
statements and the narrative provided in 
the front half of the Annual Report, and 
that there was an appropriate balance 
between the reporting of weaknesses, 
difficulties and challenges, as well as 
successes, in an open and balanced 
manner including linkage between key 
messages throughout the document.

Financial and business reporting
Through its activities, the Committee 
focuses on maintaining the integrity and 
quality of our financial reporting, 
considering the significant accounting 
judgements made by management and the 
findings of the external auditors. The 
Committee assesses whether suitable 
accounting policies have been adopted and 
whether management has made 
appropriate estimates and judgements. The 
Committee reviewed accounting papers 
prepared by management which provided 
details of significant financial reporting 
judgements. The Committee also reviewed 
the reports by the external auditors on the 
half-year, Q3 and full-year results, which 
highlighted any issues arising from the work 
undertaken on the audit.

The Committee’s process included the 
comprehensive review of financial issues 
through the challenge of management, 
consideration of the findings of the external 
auditors and comparison with other 
organisations. The significant issues 
considered in relation to the financial 
statements are detailed below.

Reporting controls
Management is responsible for maintaining 
adequate internal control over the financial 
reporting of the Group. A summary of the 
Group’s financial results and commentary 
on performance measures is provided to 
the Board each month. Controls are in 
place over the preparation of financial data 
including: balance sheet reconciliations, 
review meetings on key balances and 
commentary on variances to forecast and 
prior periods. On a monthly basis, senior 
management, including the Group Financial 
Controller and Chief Financial Officer, 
review the management reporting packs.

The Annual Report and Accounts are 
produced by the Group Financial Control 
team based on submissions from individual 
teams across the business including 
Investor Relations, Finance, HR, Company 
Secretariat and Risk and Assurance. The 
report contributors are required to maintain 
supporting evidence for their submissions 
and ensure they are reviewed. The figures 
are then independently validated by the 
Group Financial Control team and the Risk 
and Assurance team perform sample tests 
of tying disclosures back to supporting 
evidence.

The Annual Report and Accounts are 
reviewed by the AMB, Board of Directors 
and Audit Committee for accuracy and to 
ensure a fair, balanced and understandable 
view is presented. Senior members of the 
Finance team including the Chief Financial 
Officer, Chief Accountant and Group 
Financial Controller meet with the Audit 
Committee to present key events and 
discuss areas of judgement or estimates as 
outlined below. In-depth presentations on 
significant areas are provided throughout 
the year as appropriate. 

The Finance team have regular proactive 
conversations with the external auditors on 
topics which are of audit relevance. The 
external auditors perform audit procedures 
and challenge of the Annual Report and 
Accounts and present their findings to the 
Audit Committee.

The Going Concern and Viability 
Statements are on pages 74 to 77.

Financial Reporting Council 
Engagement
As part of the FRC’s thematic review of 
climate disclosures, the FRC Conduct 
Committee wrote to the Company with 
questions relating to information within our 
2019 Annual Report and Accounts. These 
questions primarily related to seeking clarity 
about how the climate transition had been 
taken into account in estimating the 
carrying value and useful life of certain 
assets. easyJet responded to the FRC’s 
questions providing clarifying information 
and noting specific enhancements it was 
planning to make to its 2020 Annual 
Report and Accounts that would address 
the questions and comments raised.  
These enhancements included expanding 
the notes to the accounts to incorporate 
additional information about how 
management took account of the impact 
of climate change and their use of stress 
testing in areas of critical judgements and 
estimates. The enhanced disclosures 
around risk, sustainability and TCFD 
disclosures, and the Viability Statement 
were highlighted. The presentation of this 
information has also been considered  
when preparing these Annual Report  
and Accounts.

The FRC requested that in disclosing this 
engagement we note the limitations of 
their review, namely that it was based on 
their reading of the Annual Report and 
Accounts and did not benefit from a 
detailed knowledge of our business  
or an understanding of the underlying 
transactions entered into. They also noted 
that their review provided no assurance 
that the report and accounts are correct  
in all material respects but rather that the 
FRC’s role is not to verify the information 
provided but to consider compliance with 
reporting requirements. 

Having provided the clarifications and 
noting the specific enhancements made to 
the 2020 Annual Report and Accounts, the 
review was concluded satisfactorily.

As part of its process for monitoring the 
standards of audit work, the Audit Quality 
Review team of the Financial Reporting 
Council (FRC) reviewed PwC’s audit of the 
Group accounts for the year ended 30 
September 2020, with the FRC report 
received in November 2021. The key finding 
for improvement related to the audit 
approach to flight bookings that utilised 
credit vouchers and ensuring they 
originated from cash receipts. PwC has 
confirmed that it has amended its 
approach for the year ended 30 
September 2021 to address this FRC  
review finding. 

126 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Risk and assurance 
Details of the risk framework and the 
principal risks and uncertainties are set  
out on pages 78 to 95.

The Audit Committee is responsible for 
overseeing the work of the Internal Audit 
function. It reviews and approves the scope 
of the Internal Audit annual plan and 
assesses the quality of Internal Audit 
reports, along with management’s actions 
relating to findings and the closure of 
recommended actions. The Audit 
Committee also considers stakeholder 
feedback on the quality of Internal Audit’s 
work and the Internal Audit function is 
subject to an independent External Quality 
Assessment (EQA) every five years in line 
with the Institute of Internal Auditors 
Standards. The last EQA was conducted in 
2017. Given the disruption to operations 
caused by the pandemic and the related 
impact on internal audit activity, the 
Committee considered that an 
independent internal quality assessment 
should be undertaken during the year, as 
an external review would not add 
significant value. The outcomes of the 
review were discussed by the Committee, 
including changes made to the internal 
audit charter and processes, but with no 
significant concerns raised. It is anticipated 
that an external EQA will be undertaken in 
the next two years once activity was less 
affected by the pandemic. 

During 2021, a carefully targeted internal 
audit plan was agreed and undertaken 
across easyJet’s operations, systems and 
support functions, with subsequent reports, 
including management responses, 
recommended action plans and follow-up 
reviews being considered by the Audit 
Committee during its meetings. 

In order to safeguard the independence of 
the Internal Audit function, the Director of 
Risk and Assurance (who heads up the 
Internal Audit function) is given the 
opportunity to meet privately with the 
Audit Committee without any other 
members of management being present.

Risk management and 
internal control
The Board as a whole, including the Audit 
Committee members, considers the nature 
and extent of easyJet’s risk management 
framework and the risk profile that is 
acceptable in order to achieve the Group’s 
strategic objectives. The Audit Committee 
has reviewed the work undertaken by 
management, the Committee itself and the 
Board on the assessment of the Group’s 
emerging and principal risks, including their 
impact on the prospects of the Group. As a 
result, it is considered that the Board has 
fulfilled its obligations under the Code in 
relation to risk management and internal 
controls. Further details on the Group’s 
principal risks and uncertainties and their 

Significant judgements
Going concern
Given the continued uncertain nature of 
the current economic environment, the 
Committee reviewed the assumptions 
made in reaching the going concern 
conclusion, including the financial 
forecasts, liquidity position, the output  
of the stress testing performed and the 
consideration of risks and uncertainties, 
as well as the enhanced going concern 
disclosure.

Carrying value of assets
The Committee considered whether the 
carrying value of goodwill, landing rights 
and aircraft assets held by easyJet should 
be impaired. There is judgement in the 
assumptions underlying the calculation  
of the value in use of the business being 
tested for impairment – primarily whether 
the forecasted cash flows are achievable, 
the potential impact of climate change  
on those cash flows, and the overall 
macroeconomic assumptions. The 
Committee addressed these matters 
using reports received from management 
outlining the basis for assumptions used, 
the stress testing performed on the 
calculation of the value in use and other 
relevant information used to support the 
carrying value of assets. The forecasted 
cash flows used in the calculation were 
presented to the Board.

Aircraft maintenance provisions
The Committee reviewed the 
maintenance provision at the year end.  
A number of judgements are used in the 
calculation of the provision, primarily 
pricing, utilisation of aircraft and timing  
of maintenance checks. The Committee 
addressed these matters using reports 
received from management which 
underpin the basis of assumptions  
used. The Committee also discussed  
with the external auditors their review  
of the assumptions underlying the 
estimates used.

impact on the prospects of the Group are 
set out on pages 78 to 95.

easyJet’s system of internal controls, along 
with its design and operating effectiveness, 
which includes the Group’s financial 
reporting process, is subject to review by 
the Audit Committee, through reports 
received from management, along with 
those from both internal and external 
auditors. Any control deficiencies identified 
are followed up, with action plans tracked 
by the AMB and the Committee.

Other key judgemental accruals, 
provisions and contingent 
liabilities
The Committee reviewed the level and 
calculations of key accruals and provisions 
which are judgemental in nature, including 
customer claims in respect of flight delays 
and cancellations, and the restructuring 
provision. The Committee also considered 
the appropriateness of the recognition of 
contingent liabilities as at the year end. 
The Committee addressed these  
matters using reports received from 
management which set out the key 
assumptions used and the judgements 
involved. The Committee also discussed 
with the external auditors their review  
of the assumptions underlying the 
estimates used.

Deferred tax asset
The Committee has considered the 
recoverability of the deferred tax  
asset based on the expected future 
taxable income of the Group. The 
Committee reviewed a report received 
from management outlining the basis  
of key assumptions used and the 
judgements involved.

Fleet accounting
The Committee have considered the 
appropriateness of the estimates used  
for the useful economic life and residual 
value of aircraft. The Committee 
considered these matters using reports 
received from management and external 
experts which underpin the estimations. 
The Committee also discussed with  
the external auditors their review of  
the assumptions underlying the  
estimates used. 

Anti-bribery and whistleblowing
The Code includes a provision that there 
should be a means for the workforce to 
raise concerns and that the Board should 
routinely review this mechanism and the 
reports arising from its operation. The 
Board and Audit Committee receive regular 
reports on this subject, and the Audit 
Committee assists the Board in ensuring 
that adequate arrangements are in place 
for the proportionate and independent 
investigation of such matters and for 
appropriate follow-up action, with the 
findings being regularly reported to the 
Board.

www.easyJet.com

127

GOVERNANCEC ORPORATE GOVERNANCE  REP ORT   (CONTINU ED)

The Group is committed to the highest 
standards of quality, honesty, openness 
and accountability. The Group and all 
operating companies have whistleblowing 
policies in place. Employees are 
encouraged to raise concerns under the 
policy and any concerns raised are 
investigated carefully and thoroughly to 
assess what action, if any, should be taken. 
The Business Integrity Committee is a 
management forum on whistleblowing. It 
receives summaries of all reported 
concerns; it monitors any ongoing 
concerns and ensures that the proposed 
outcomes of investigations are fair, 
transparent and robust, with root causes 
identified and remedial actions agreed. Any 
matters of significance are reported to the 
Audit Committee and the Board, along with 
a comprehensive full year report. The 
Board supports the objectives of the 
Bribery Act 2010 and procedures have 
been established to ensure that compliance 
is achieved. These set out what is expected 
from our colleagues and stakeholders to 
ensure that they protect themselves, as 
well as the Group’s reputation and assets. 
Training has been provided to the Board, 
senior management and all employees and 
is refreshed on a regular basis. Any breach 
of the Bribery Act will be regarded as 
serious misconduct, potentially justifying 
immediate dismissal.

External auditor
PwC, as the external auditor, is engaged to 
conduct a statutory audit and express an 
opinion on the financial statements. Its 
audit includes the review of the systems of 
internal financial control and data which are 
used to produce the information contained 
in the financial statements. PwC was 
reappointed as auditor of the Group at the 
AGM held on 23 December 2020. The last 
tender process was undertaken in 2015 for 
the year ended 30 September 2016.

The current external audit engagement 
partner is Owen Mackney, Senior Statutory 
Auditor, who took over the role during the 
year from Andrew Kemp. The external 
audit plan and the £1.1 million fee proposal 
for the financial year under review (2020: 
£0.8 million) was prepared by PwC and 
presented to the Committee for 
consideration and approval.

External auditor effectiveness and 
independence
Senior management monitors the external 
auditor’s performance, behaviour and 
effectiveness during the exercise of its 
duties, which informs the Audit Committee’s 
decision on whether to recommend 
reappointment on an annual basis.

The Audit Committee also assesses  
the effectiveness, independence and 
objectivity of the external auditor by, 
amongst other things:

•  considering all key external auditor  

plans and reports; in particular those 
summarising audit work performed on 
significant risks and critical judgements 
identified, and detailed audit testing 
thereon

•  having regular engagement with the 
external auditor during Committee 
meetings and ad hoc meetings (when 
required), including meetings without any 
member of management being present
•  the Committee Chair having discussions 
with the Senior Statutory Auditor ahead 
of each Committee meeting 

•  understanding the extent to which the 

auditor challenges management’s 
analysis

•  considering FRC audit quality inspection 

reports

•  following the end of the financial year, 
each Committee member completing  
an auditor effectiveness review 
questionnaire.

The Committee was satisfied that the 
external audit had provided appropriate 
focus to those areas identified as the key 
risk areas to be considered by the Audit 
Committee and that the auditors had 
challenged management as part of the 
process. It had also continued to address 
the areas of significant accounting 
estimates. On this basis, and considering 
the views of senior management, the 
Committee concurred that the external 
audit had been effective and that PwC 
remained independent.

External auditor objectivity
To preserve objectivity and independence, 
the external auditor does not provide 
consulting services unless this is in 
compliance with the Group’s Non-audit 
Services Policy which reflects the applicable 
audit regulations and the FRC’s Revised 
Ethical Standard 2016. This policy is 
available in the Governance section of 
easyJet’s corporate website at corporate.
easyjet.com. 

In the 2021 financial year, PwC undertook 
audit-related non-audit services for the 
Company, as set out in note 3 to the 
financial statements. In addition, they 
undertook the non-audit work below in 
relation to the rights issue.

Rights issue 
As part of the preparations for the rights 
issue announced in September 2021, 
certain non-audit assurance was required 
of the financial information presented in 
the prospectus. Management felt that PwC 
would be best placed to undertake this 
work if appropriate safeguards could be 
put in place, and this was discussed and 
approved by the Committee prior to work 
taking place. The fees for the non-audit 
work were £1.2 million and agreed by the 
Committee. This resulted in the 70% fee 
cap (70% of the average of the UK/Group 
fees paid in the last three consecutive 
financial years for the statutory audit) 
being exceeded, therefore approval was 
sought from the FRC for PwC to perform 
the work. The FRC provided such approval 
and granted dispensation for PwC to 
perform the work before the services 
commenced. A number of measures were 
implemented to ensure that the objectivity 
of PwC as auditors of the Company was 
safeguarded:

•  The non-audit work was led by an 

independent PwC partner and team 
members not involved in the audit, and 
subject to review by an independent 
review partner.

•  The services were performed on a 

one-off basis, and were clearly set out in 
an engagement letter.

•  All fees for the additional reporting 

accountant services were invoiced and 
settled in full before the audit work was 
finalised.

128 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

assessment criteria. Due to the tender 
undertaken in 2015, and the rotation of  
the Audit Partner in 2020, the Committee 
believes that a tender being undertaken  
in the 2024/25 financial year remains 
appropriate and is in the best interests of 
shareholders. The Company confirms that 
it has complied with the provisions of the 
Statutory Audit Services for Large 
Companies Market Investigation 
(Mandatory Use of Competitive Tender 
Processes and Audit Committee 
Responsibilities) Order 2014 relating to 
tendering and non-audit services.

Looking forward
The Committee will continue to consider 
the financial reporting of the Group and 
review the Group’s accounting policies and 
annual statements. In particular, any major 
accounting issues of a subjective nature will 
be discussed by the Committee.

The Committee will also continue to  
review internal and external audit activity 
and the effectiveness of the risk 
management process.

•  A Quality Review Partner would be 

involved in the audit, and be responsible 
for performing a further review over the 
performance of the audit.

•  A clearance panel including a further 
three independent partners was held 
prior to completion of the non-audit 
work to provide an additional level  
of review.

The one off nature of these non-audit 
services and that they were assurance 
based was also deemed to ensure that the 
objectivity of PwC was safeguarded.

External audit tendering
PwC was first appointed to audit the 
Annual Report and Accounts for the year 
ended 30 September 2006, and has 
therefore served a 15-year term. Under 
applicable audit legislation, companies are 
required to have a mandatory tender of 
auditors after 10 years, or 20 years if there 
is a competitive re-tender at 10 years. 
During the 2015 financial year, the 
Committee led a tender process for 
external audit services, following which the 
Audit Committee agreed to recommend 
that the Board reappoint PwC as, on 
balance, it performed best against the 
Committee’s pre-agreed selection and 

External audit tendering timeline

2006
PwC appointed

2015
Full competitive 
tender; PwC 
reappointed for year 
ending 30 September 
2016

2024/2025
Competitive tender to 
take place unless 
carried out earlier

2020
Mandatory 
appointment of new 
external audit lead 
partner after five 
years to sign off on 
the 2021 financial year 
(see the ‘External 
auditor’ paragraph 
above)

2026
PwC cannot continue 
beyond financial year 
end 30 September 
2025 and a 
competitive tender 
will take place 

(if not already 
effected prior to  
this date)

www.easyJet.com

129

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REMUNERATIO N  R EPORT

Annual statement by the Chair 
of the Remuneration Committee

This has been a busy year for the Committee as we 
have reviewed the impact of the pandemic upon 
our people and the remuneration framework, 
together with a review of the Remuneration  
policy and the considerations of the rights issue.  
I am delighted that I have had the opportunity to 
engage with our major shareholders over the year 
to discuss these topics. 

Moni Mannings
Chair of the Remuneration Committee

On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to 
present the Directors’ Remuneration Report 
(the ‘Report’) for the year ended 30 
September 2021, my first as Chair of the 
Committee. This has been a challenging 
year due to the pandemic and the impact 
this has had on our teams, as well as our 
financial performance. Many individuals 
continued to be placed on furlough and 
everyone faced the lockdowns that 
continued for much of the year across 
Europe. This has impacted on individuals 
reward opportunities during this year both 
in terms of salary increases and bonus, and 
as a Committee we have been mindful of 
this. We have taken this into account, along 
with the impact on our shareholder 
experience, in all our considerations.

This Report contains:

•  The proposed Directors’ remuneration 
policy, including our new Restricted 
Share Plan (RSP) to be approved at the 
2022 AGM; and

•  The annual remuneration report 

describing how the existing policy has 
been put into practice during the last 
year, and how the new policy will be 
implemented in 2022.

Performance and reward 
outcomes for the 2021  
financial year
Annual bonus
In light of continued market uncertainty, 
the annual bonus targets were set 
separately for the first and second half of 
the financial year to allow flexibility and 
agility. The measures selected for the 
bonus aligned with our key priorities for the 

year and were EBITDA (30%), cost 
reduction programme (20%), free cash 
flow (20%), customer satisfaction (10%) 
and individual performance (20%). 
Recognising the importance of our  
ESG agenda, individual targets included 
sustainability measures as well as  
measures linked to strategy execution.

Due to the continuing restrictions on  
airline travel and the impact of this on our 
performance no annual bonus in respect  
of the year ended 30 September 2021  
will be paid.

LTIP
Awards granted in 2018 were due to vest 
based on performance to 30 September 
2021. Awards were based on a combination 
of performance conditions, being three-
year average headline ROCE, total headline 
EPS and relative TSR compared to FTSE 
51-150 companies measured over the three 
financial years to 30 September 2021.

The stretching performance targets for the 
2018 LTIP award, which were set before the 
pandemic, were not met and therefore this 
award will lapse.

2020 LTIP awards
In December 2020 the Committee made 
awards to the executives under the LTIP. 
Due to the prevailing uncertainty at the 
time of award, and in line with the flexibility 
provided in the Investment Association’s 
Covid-19 guidance, the decision was made 
to delay target setting for up to six months 
when we hoped the long term economic 
situation would be clearer. However, with 
lockdowns ongoing within the UK and 
much of Europe in early 2021 along with 

Membership, meetings,  
and attendance
•  Moni Mannings (Chair from 8 

October 2020) 

•  Charles Gurassa (until 23 

December 2020)

•  Moya Greene DBE (Chair until 8 
October 2020 and member until 
23 December 2020)

•  Julie Southern
•  David Robbie (from 17 November 

2020)

There were three changes to the 
membership of the Committee 
during the year as set out above. 
The Company Secretary acts as 
Secretary of the Committee. 
Other key invitees include the 
Chief Executive, the Group People 
Director, the Reward Director, the 
Chief Financial Officer, and external 
advisers as relevant.

Member biographies setting out  
their skills and experience can  
be found on pages 98 to 101. 
The Committee met five times 
during the year. Meeting attendance 
can be found in the table on 
page 112.

The Committee’s terms of  
reference can be found on  
the Company’s website at  
https://corporate.easyjet.com.

130 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

What is in this Report?
This Report describes the 
implementation of easyJet’s 
remuneration policy for Executive 
and Non-Executive Directors and 
discloses the amounts earned 
relating to the year ended 30 
September 2021. The Report 
complies with the provisions of the 
Companies Act 2006 and supporting 
regulations. The Report has been 
prepared in line with the provisions of 
the UK Corporate Governance Code 
and the requirements of the UK 
Listing Authority Listing Rules.

The Directors’ remuneration policy 
(set out on pages 136 to 142) will be 
put to shareholders in a binding vote 
at the forthcoming AGM and, if 
approved, will formally supersede the 
current policy with immediate effect. 
The Annual Statement by the Chair 
of the Remuneration Committee 
(set out on pages 130 to 133) and the 
Annual Report on Remuneration 
(set out on pages 143 to 153) will 
together be subject to an advisory 
vote at the forthcoming AGM.

windfall gains when the market recovers 
and determine a fair outcome based on 
the performance of easyJet over the entire 
performance period.

I consulted with a number of major 
shareholders on behalf of the Committee 
regarding this approach who were 
supportive.

New Restricted Share Plan
During the year the Committee undertook 
a detailed review of our Directors’ 
remuneration policy to ensure that the 
remuneration arrangements we have in 
place will support long term strategic 
decision making, directly align management 
with the interests of shareholders, are 
appropriate to support the business as we 
continue to recover from the pandemic, 
and that they motivate Executive Directors, 
the Airline Management Board and the 
broader management population to drive 
the business and reward them in line with 
the shareholder experience.

After careful consideration and 
consultation with our largest shareholders, 
the Remuneration Committee has 
concluded that a Restricted Share Plan is 
the best approach for the Company going 
forward to align management with 
shareholders, support the execution of our 
strategy and the creation of long term 
sustainable shareholder value. We will 
therefore be putting forward a revised 
Directors’ remuneration policy to the 2022 
AGM incorporating such a plan. Details of 
the other changes proposed are set out on 
the following pages.

continued restrictions on travel, there was 
still a high level of uncertainty over the 
medium-term outlook. 

Our LTIP awards were normally based on 
headline ROCE (40%), headline EPS (40%) 
and relative TSR (20%). However, the 
continued external uncertainty meant that 
the previous approach for the LTIP of 
setting a mix of three-year financial targets 
was very challenging and was likely to 
remain so for some time. In light of this, the 
Committee concluded that setting financial 
targets for the 2020 LTIP award would not 
be fair and could result in either unduly 
difficult or easy targets driven by external 
events rather than management action. 

The Committee’s view was that in the 
circumstances, shareholder alignment is a 
key measure of success where 
management will benefit if shareholders do 
and vice versa. It was therefore decided 
that the 2020 LTIP award would be based 
100% on TSR performance. The Committee 
believes basing the award 100% on TSR is a 
clear and simple approach and ensures 
that the vesting outcome is fully aligned 
with the shareholder experience. It also 
removes the need to set financial targets in 
uncertain economic times whilst providing 
clarity for management and shareholders.

In line with best practice and shareholder 
expectations the Committee shall retain 
discretion to adjust the vesting outcome 
where outcomes are not considered to be 
reflective of underlying financial or 
non-financial performance of the business, 
the performance of the individual or where 
the outcome is not considered appropriate 
in the context of the experience of 
shareholders or other stakeholders. 
Similarly, the Committee will consider 
whether it is appropriate to make any 
adjustments to ensure that the Executive 
Directors do not benefit unduly from 

After careful consideration and consultation with our 
largest shareholders, the Remuneration Committee has 
concluded that the LTIP should be replaced with a 
Restricted Share Plan. We believe that this is the best 
approach for the Company going forward to support the 
execution of our strategy and the creation of long term 
shareholder value. 

www.easyJet.com

131

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REMUNERATIO N  R EPORT  (CONTI NUE D)

Rationale for a Restricted Share Plan
The Committee believes that amending the policy to include a Restricted Share Plan (RSP) is appropriate for easyJet for the following 
reasons:

Reason

Rationale

easyJet is an asset 
heavy business that 
requires long term 
decision making

Aligns management 
and shareholders for 
long term sustainable 
value creation

easyJet’s performance 
is heavily influenced by 
external factors

The Company is focused on making long term investments to drive long term sustainable value 
creation. The Committee believes that three-year performance targets risk creating too much focus 
on delivering for the medium rather than the long term. 

We believe that an RSP, which does not rely on hitting three-year targets, will better support the 
longer-term decision making required to deliver superior long term shareholder value creation

The past two years have been challenging and we are grateful to shareholders for their support, 
particularly in relation to the recent rights issue. 

Going forward we want to have a remuneration framework which clearly aligns management with our 
shareholders for long term value. The Committee believes that the RSP will better align management 
with the experience of shareholders through the alignment of reward outcomes with the share price.

The airline and travel sector is exposed to external factors outside of management’s control which 
make it challenging to set realistic but stretching performance targets for the Company over the long 
term. This includes for example changing governmental requirements, the impact of Covid-19 or 
security issues. This has led to significant variability of previous LTIP outcomes (set out in the chart 
below). This variability, which has been largely impacted by external factors rather than underlying 
operational performance, has impacted the motivational impact of the LTIP for management.

An RSP would simplify our approach to reward policy, strongly aligning the interests of management 
with those of shareholders and thereby improving the motivational impact of incentives.

easyJet's historical LTIP payouts (% of max)
Vesting levels (%)

100100

100100

100100

9292

7070

3232

1515

00

00

00

2012

2013

2014 2015

2016

2017

2018

2019 2020 2021

Medium-term 
uncertainty in the 
sector and business

Given the difficulties in rebuilding the sector, simplifying our approach to remuneration will act as a 
retention tool across our management teams as we navigate out of the initial impact of the Covid-19 
pandemic and take the necessary steps required to ensure the business recovers.

RSP Awards have been 
used before in the 
business for more 
junior roles

Given the strategic rationale, we are already issuing RSPs within the wider workforce as an effective 
component on the reward framework. Implementing Restricted Share Plan Awards for the Executive 
Directors would ensure a consistent approach with other employees where RSP awards have already 
been used and so better align executive pay across the Airline Management Board and other 
executives and managers in the business. 

Fits with easyJet’s 
reward principles

Including an RSP ties in with easyJet’s remuneration principles i.e. simple and cost effective, aligned 
with business strategy and further aligns executives with shareholders and other stakeholders in the 
business. 

132 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Operation of the RSP
The following provides a summary of how 
the RSP will operate:

•  Award size: The maximum award will be 
125% of salary for the CEO and 100% of 
salary for the CFO. This is a 50% 
reduction compared to the current long 
term incentive opportunity under the 
LTIP (250% and 200% of base salary for 
the CEO and CFO respectively). This 
reflects best practice and shareholder 
expectations.

•  Time horizons: Awards will vest 100% on 
the third anniversary of the award and 
will then be subject to a two-year holding 
period, so that the total time horizon is 
five years for the entire award. 

This approach is illustrated here:

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

100% vests after 3 years

holding period

Whole award subject to holding period of 5 years
`

•  Performance underpins: Awards will be 
subject to the following performance 
underpins measured over the vesting 
periods. If any underpin is not met, the 
Committee will consider whether it is 
appropriate to reduce the portion of the 
award vesting, based on its judgement  
of the context. Having carefully 
considered the strategic imperatives  
for the business at this time, the 
proposed underpins for the awards 
proposed for the 2022 financial year are:

1.  That easyJet does not fall below its 

minimum liquidity target (such that a 
credit risk is triggered) through the 
vesting period.

2. Satisfactory governance performance 
including no ESG issues that result in 
material reputational damage to the 
reputation of the Company (as 
determined by the Board).

3. The Committee will operate a further 
underpin such that if the Company’s 
performance taken as a whole materially 
underperforms what might reasonably 
have been expected for the sector for 
reasons attributable to management 
action or inaction, the Committee will  
at its discretion reduce the award 
quantum appropriately.

The Committee intends to review the 
underpins to be applied in subsequent 
years.

I consulted with a number of our major 
shareholders on behalf of the Committee 
regarding the move to a Restricted Share 
Plan. During these discussions shareholders 
recognised and understood the rationale to 
implement an RSP and provided their 
feedback on the suggested approach. This 
feedback has been considered carefully by 
the Committee. 

Other aspects of remuneration 
Base salary
In light of the circumstances of the 
business and our commitments under our 
CCFF and UKEF financing, Executive 
Directors will not receive a salary increase 
for the year ended 30 September 2022. 
Salaries will therefore remain at £740,000 
for the CEO and £520,000 for the CFO.

Annual bonus
The operation of the annual bonus will 
continue broadly unchanged although we 
will revert back to being based on full year 
targets. The maximum opportunity will 
continue to be 200% of base salary (Chief 
Executive) and 175% of base salary (Chief 
Financial Officer). 

For the year ended 30 September 2022 
the annual bonus will be based 30% on 
EBITDAR performance, 50% on a balanced 
scorecard of financial and operational 
objectives including Free Cash Flow, 
Ancillary Yield, Cost Programme 
Performance and CSAT and 20% based on 
individual performance. Individual 
performance includes measures linked to 
our sustainability strategy, recognising the 
increasing importance of this to the 
business, as well as measures linked to 
easyJet holiday’s performance and 
employee engagement. The Committee 
has chosen to use a balanced scorecard 
approach to assessing performance for 
50% of the bonus this year to ensure that 
we are providing a balanced incentive to 
drive performance across a range of areas. 
The Committee will consider performance 
against each measure and determine an 
appropriate total outcome for the 
scorecard at the end of the year. At least 
40% of the scorecard will be linked to 
financial measures ensuring that at least 
50% of the overall bonus is linked to 
financial measures. In addition, as in 
previous years, a safety underpin applies 
such that the Committee may scale back 
the bonus earned (including to zero) in  
the event that there is a safety event  
which it considers warrants the use of  
such discretion.

Any payment will be additionally 
assessed against the requirements for  
the UKEF.

Rights issue
In September 2021 the Board undertook a 
rights issue raising £1.2bn to facilitate the 
Group’s recovery from the impact of the 
pandemic and to materially improve 
easyJet’s ability to deliver long-term value 
to shareholders through providing the 
Group with the flexibility to take advantage 
of strategic and investment opportunities. 
We thank our shareholders for their 
support in this process.

In accordance with standard practice we 
have adjusted outstanding share awards  
to reflect the impact of the rights issue.  
We will also be reviewing targets for 
outstanding incentive awards for the 
impact of the rights issue to ensure that 
the degree of stretch remains appropriate. 

Board changes
During the year we were delighted to 
welcome Kenton Jarvis who joined us as 
CFO on 3 February 2021. In the 2020 
Directors’ Remuneration Report we outlined 
that we had provided Kenton with a 
combination of buy-out awards to replace 
awards he forfeited on leaving his previous 
employer. Having considered this approach 
further, the Committee and Kenton agreed 
that, taking into account the likelihood of 
vesting of the forfeited share awards, share 
buy-out awards would not be granted at 
this time. The cash buy-out awards, 
totalling £300,000, are due to be paid,  
net of appropriate withholdings, in the 
December 2021 payroll. Also, following his 
appointment, in May 2021 Kenton was 
granted a normal award of 200% of base 
salary under the LTIP. This award was 
granted on the same terms and linked to 
the same performance conditions as  
the LTIP awards granted to other senior 
executives in December 2020 as  
outlined above.

On behalf of the Committee I would like  
to thank shareholders for their continued 
support during 2021 and ahead of the  
next AGM. 

Moni Mannings
Chair of the Remuneration Committee 

www.easyJet.com

133

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REMUNERATIO N  R EPORT  (CONTI NUE D)

Remuneration  
at a glance

Reward principles
The Remuneration Committee’s primary objective is to design a remuneration framework which promotes the long-term success of the 
Group. For some time, we have been guided by the following reward principles:

Principle

Application in remuneration framework

Simple and 
cost effective

To establish a simple and cost-effective reward package in line with our low-cost and efficient business 
model. 

Aligned with  
business strategy

To support the achievement of our business strategy of long term sustainable growth and returns. The 
combination of our annual bonus plan based on a mix of financial, operational and strategic targets and 
our new long term Restricted Share Plan ensures that value is delivered to shareholders and that Executive 
Directors are rewarded for the successful and sustained delivery of the key strategic objectives of the 
Group.

Sustainable  
long term success

Total remuneration is weighted towards elements which align with sustainable long term shareholder value 
creation. This ensures that there is a clear link between the value created for shareholders and the amount 
paid to our Executive Directors. 

Mindful of the  
wider stakeholder 
experience

Notwithstanding the financial performance of the business, overall remuneration outcomes will be mindful 
of the wider stakeholder experience to ensure Executive Director remuneration remains fair, responsible, 
and sustainable. 

SINGLE TOTAL FIGURE OF REMUNERATION (£’000)

Johan Lundgren (Chief Executive)

2021

2020

Kenton Jarvis (Chief Financial Officer)1

2021

£794

£755

XX

£363

£0

£100

£200

£300

£400

£500

£600

£700

£800

£900

£1000

Fixed

Bonus

LTIP

1.  Appointed on 3 February 2021

134 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Executive Director remuneration policy – at a glance

Element

Salary

Policy

Implementation of policy for the 2022 financial year

Increases normally up to the average 
workforce level (though may be increased 
at higher rates in certain circumstances, 
for example where a new Executive 
Director has been appointed to the Board 
at a lower than typical market salary to 
allow for growth in the role).

In line with the wider workforce pay freezes, the salaries for Johan 
Lundgren and Kenton Jarvis will not be increased during the 2022 
financial year. Salaries will therefore continue to be £740,000 for the 
CEO and £520,000 for the CFO.

Benefits and 
pension

Modest benefits with pension provision 
aligned to the wider workforce.

Annual bonus

Maximum opportunity is 200% of base 
salary (Chief Executive) and 175% of base 
salary (Chief Financial Officer). One-third 
of bonus is deferred into shares for three 
years. Majority based on financial metrics. 
Withholding and recovery provisions 
apply.

Restricted 
Share Plan 
(RSP)

Normal maximum awards of 125% of 
salary (Chief Executive) and 100% of 
salary (Chief Financial Officer). Up to 
150% of salary in exceptional 
circumstances.

Three-year performance period plus 
two-year post-vesting holding period.

Awards will be subject to performance 
underpins measured over the vesting 
periods. Withholding and recovery 
provisions apply.

Share 
ownership 
guidelines

250% of salary (Chief Executive) and 
200% of salary (Chief Financial Officer).

Expected to retain 50% of post-tax shares 
vesting under the RSP and 100% of 
post-tax deferred bonus shares until 
guideline is met.

Pension allowance of 6.15% of salary (being the cash alternative to a 
7% employer contribution less the equivalent value of UK employers’ 
national insurance contributions) plus modest benefits aligned to the 
market. 

Maximum will remain at 200% of base salary for the Chief Executive 
and at 175% of base salary for the Chief Financial Officer. The bonus 
for the 2022 financial year will be based 30% on EBITDAR 
performance, 50% on a balanced score card of Company 
performance targets including free cash flow, cost control, customer 
feedback, operational performance and ancillary revenue, and 20% 
on individual performance including measures linked to sustainability, 
strategy and employee engagement. The Committee will review 
performance against these measures and has the discretion to 
determine the appropriate level of award at the end of the financial 
year based on performance achieved. As in previous years a safety 
underpin applies such that the Committee may scale back the bonus 
earned (including to zero) in the event that there is a safety event 
which it considers warrants the use of such discretion.

The normal maximum award will be 125% of salary for the Chief 
Executive and 100% of salary for the Chief Financial Officer. 

Performance underpins will be: (i) That easyJet does not fall below 
its minimum liquidity target (such that a credit risk is triggered) 
through the vesting period; and (ii) Satisfactory governance 
performance including no ESG issues that result in material 
reputational damage to the reputation of the Company (as 
determined by the Board). If the Company does not meet one or 
more of the underpins the Committee would consider whether it 
was appropriate to scale back the level of payout under the award 
to reflect this. The Committee would retain discretion to determine 
what level of scale back, if any, was appropriate.

The Committee will also operate a further underpin such that if the 
Company’s performance taken as a whole materially underperforms 
what might reasonably have been expected for the sector for 
reasons attributable to management action or inaction, the 
Committee will at its discretion reduce the award quantum 
appropriately. 

The Committee will review the appropriate underpins to be used for 
each award.

Similarly, the Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to 
make any adjustments to ensure that the Executive Directors do not 
benefit unduly from windfall gains when the market recovers and 
determine a fair outcome.

250% of base salary for the Chief Executive and 200% of base 
salary for the Chief Financial Officer. These guidelines will apply to all 
new Director appointments and all current Directors not under 
notice.

Post cessation 
share 
ownership 
guidelines

Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer 
required to hold up to 100% of their 
shareholding requirement for two years 
after leaving office. 

Executive Directors will be expected to maintain a minimum 
shareholding equal to the guideline (or their actual shareholding if 
lower) for two years following stepping down as an Executive 
Director. These guidelines will only apply to any shares from incentive 
awards for all new and current Directors not under notice.

www.easyJet.com

135

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REMUNERATIO N  R EPORT  (CONTI NUE D)

Directors’ remuneration policy

This part of the Directors’ Remuneration 
Report sets out easyJet’s Directors’ 
remuneration policy. This revised policy  
will be put to shareholders for approval  
in a binding vote at the AGM on  
10 February 2022 and will be effective  
from this date. The Committee’s current 
intention is that the policy will operate  
for a three-year period.

As outlined in the Remuneration 
Committee Chair’s statement, following 
extensive consideration and consultation 
with shareholders, the Committee has 
concluded that going forwards replacing 
our existing LTIP with a Restricted Share 
Plan (RSP) is the best approach to  
support the execution of our strategy  
and the creation of long term shareholder 
value. Under the RSP the awards will be 
lower, however vesting will be subject  
to the achievement of performance  
underpins only rather than stretching 
performance targets. 

Other than the introduction of the RSP 
there are no other major changes to this 
policy compared to the 2020 Directors’ 
remuneration policy. Minor changes have 
been made to the wording of the policy in 
certain areas to aid operation and to 
increase clarity.

Role of our Remuneration 
Committee
The Remuneration Committee has 
responsibility for determining remuneration 
for the Executive Directors, the Chairman 
of the Board, and members of the Airline 
Management Board. The Committee takes 
into account the need to recruit and retain 
executives and ensure that they are 
properly motivated to perform in the long 
term interests of the Company and its 
shareholders, while paying no more than  
is necessary. In addition, the Committee  
will review and be appraised on the 
application of the remuneration policy  
for senior management and all employee 
populations across the Group to ensure 
that decisions remain mindful of the wider 
employee experience.

In determining the new Directors’ 
remuneration policy, the Committee 
followed a robust process which included 
discussions on the content of the policy at 
Remuneration Committee meetings during 
the year. The Committee considered the 
input from management and independent 
advisers, as well as extensively consulting 
on best practice with major shareholders 
and proxy and advisory services.

Considerations when 
determining the remuneration 
policy
The primary objective of the Group’s 
remuneration policy is to align 
management interests with the long term 
interests of shareholders and to promote 
the sustainable long term success of the 
business by operating pay arrangements 
which are appropriately competitive.  
When setting the policy for Executive 
Directors’ remuneration, the Committee 
takes into account total remuneration 
levels operating in companies of a similar 
size and complexity as well as companies  
in the wider aviation and travel & leisure 
sector, the responsibilities of each individual 
role, individual performance and an 
individual’s experience. 

Our overall policy, having given due regard 
to the factors noted above, is to weight 
remuneration towards elements which 
aligns management with sustainable long 
term shareholder value creation. This is 
typically achieved through setting base pay 
at a competitive level, offering modest 
benefits with pension provision at similar 
levels to the wider UK workforce, and 
providing the potential to earn a 
performance based annual bonus linked  
to Group financial and strategic or 
operational targets. An award of  
restricted shares supports long term 
decision making and aligns management’s 
interest with those of shareholders.

Considering the views of 
employees when determining the 
remuneration policy
In setting remuneration for the Executive 
Directors, the Committee takes note of  
the overall approach to reward for 
employees in the Group. Salary increases 
will ordinarily be (in percentage of salary 
terms) no higher than those of the wider 
workforce (other than in circumstances 
described below). 

Effective 1 January 2019, the Group 
appointed Moya Greene as their Employee 
Representative Director to enhance the 
voice of the employee in the boardroom. 
As set out on page 109, the Board revised 
this mechanism during the year and 
appointed four Non-Executive Directors as 
Employee Representative Directors. The 
Employee Representative Directors are 
expected to meet individually with the 
Company’s European Works Council 
(‘EWC’) and Management & Administration 
Consultative Group (‘MACG’) at least once 

a year, and other Works Councils on a 
periodic basis. In addition, other more 
informal engagement is envisaged. A 
standing agenda item allows the Employee 
Representative Directors to report to the 
Board regularly on their discussions, and 
they are encouraged to bring the employee 
voice into conversations in the boardroom 
whenever possible, including any matters 
that may contribute to the decision making 
of the Committee. 

During the year Moni Mannings met with 
the MACG to discuss a range of topics and 
answer their questions. Feedback was 
received on the reward framework at 
easyJet and what changes may be 
considered in the future to support 
retention and engagement.

In addition, the Group People Director  
and Reward Director meet with the EWC 
and MACG to update them on reward 
activities, answer questions and receive 
feedback, which is then reported to the 
Committee. During 2021 the Reward 
Director specifically met with the MACG  
to discuss the rights issue and the reward 
structure at all levels and with the EWC  
to update them on the impact of the  
rights issue on employee share schemes, 
together with other reward related 
questions. Feedback received at these 
meetings has directly resulted in some 
changes and enhancements to the benefit 
offering for employees. 

The Committee also considers 
developments in best practice expectations 
from institutional investors’ and the views 
expressed by shareholders during any 
dialogue when making executive 
remuneration decisions.

Considering the views of 
shareholders when determining 
the remuneration policy
easyJet remains committed to shareholder 
dialogue and takes an active interest in 
voting outcomes. We consult extensively 
with our major shareholders when setting 
our remuneration policy or when 
considering any significant changes to our 
remuneration arrangements. The 
Committee also considers shareholder 
feedback received in relation to the 
Directors’ Remuneration Report each year 
following the AGM. This, plus any additional 
feedback received from time to time, is 
then considered as part of the Committee’s 
annual review of the remuneration policy 
and its implementation.

136 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Remuneration structure
The table below sets out the main components of easyJet’s remuneration policy:

Element, purpose  
and link to strategy

Base salary
To provide the core 
reward for the role.

Set at a sufficient level 
to recruit and retain 
individuals of the 
necessary calibre to 
execute the Company’s 
business strategy.

Benefits
In line with the 
Company’s policy to 
keep remuneration 
simple and consistent.

Pension
To provide employees 
with long term savings via 
pension provisions in line 
with the Company’s 
strategy to keep 
remuneration simple 
and consistent. 

Operation (including maximum  
levels where applicable)
Salaries are normally reviewed annually, with changes typically effective 
from 1 January.

Salaries are typically set after considering salary levels in companies of a 
similar size and complexity as well as companies in the wider aviation and 
travel & leisure sector, the responsibilities of each individual role, 
progression within the role, individual performance, and an individual’s 
experience. Our overall policy, having given due regard to the factors 
noted, is normally to target salaries at a broadly market competitive level 
in the context of the total package.

Salaries may be increased, and any increase will ordinarily be no higher 
than those of the wider workforce (in percentage of salary terms).

However, increases beyond those granted to the wider workforce (in 
percentage of salary terms) may be awarded in certain circumstances 
such as to reflect performance, significant changes in market practice or 
the size of the Company, to recognise changes in roles and responsibilities 
or where a new Executive Director has been appointed to the Board at a 
lower than typical market salary to allow for growth in the role.
Executive Directors are entitled to a combination of modest benefits 
aligned to the market, such as life assurance and other insurance 
arrangements as well as a range of voluntary benefits including the 
purchase of additional holiday. 

The Company provides Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance and may 
provide an indemnity to the fullest extent permitted by the Companies 
Act (see Directors’ Report section).

Where required, a car allowance or the use of a driver for Company 
business may be provided.

Executive Directors shall be reimbursed for all reasonable business 
expenses and the Company may settle any tax incurred in relation to 
these where appropriate.

Where an Executive Director is required to relocate to perform their role, 
appropriate one-off or ongoing benefits may be provided (such as 
housing support, schooling etc).

Executive Directors are also eligible to participate in any all-employee 
share plans operated by the Company, in line with HMRC guidelines 
currently prevailing (where relevant), on the same basis as for other 
eligible employees.

The Committee may introduce other benefits if it is considered 
appropriate to do so.
Defined contribution plan with the same monthly employer contributions 
as those offered to eligible employees in the wider UK workforce (i.e. up 
to 7% of base salary); or a cash alternative to the same value, which will 
normally be less the equivalent value of employer National Insurance 
contribution costs.

easyJet operates a pension salary sacrifice arrangement whereby all UK 
employees, including Executive Directors, can exchange part of their 
salary for Company-paid pension contributions. Where employees 
exchange salary this reduces employer National Insurance contributions. 
easyJet credits half of this NI reduction (currently 6.9% of the salary 
exchanged) to the individual’s pension plan.

Framework used to assess 
performance and provisions  
for the recovery of sums paid
The Committee considers 
individual salaries at the 
appropriate Committee 
meeting each year after 
having due regard to the 
factors noted in operating 
the salary policy.

No recovery provisions apply 
to base salary.

Not applicable.

No recovery provisions apply 
to benefits.

Not applicable.

No recovery provisions apply 
to employer pension 
contributions.

www.easyJet.com

137

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REMUNERATIO N  R EPORT  (CONTI NUE D)

Remuneration structure (continued)

Element, purpose  
and link to strategy

Annual bonus
To incentivise and 
recognise execution of 
the business strategy 
on an annual basis.

Rewards the 
achievement of annual 
financial and 
operational goals.

Compulsory deferral of 
a portion of the bonus 
provides alignment 
with shareholders.

Operation (including maximum  
levels where applicable)
Maximum opportunity of 200% of salary for Chief 
Executive and 175% of salary for other Executive 
Directors.

One-third of the pre-tax bonus earned is normally 
subject to compulsory deferral into shares (or 
equivalent), typically for a period of three years, and is 
normally subject to continued employment.

The remainder of the bonus is typically paid in cash.

Dividend equivalent payments may be made on the 
deferred bonus at the time of vesting and may 
assume the reinvestment of dividends.

All bonus payments are at the discretion of the 
Committee, as set out following this table.

Restricted Share Plan 
(RSP) award
To incentivise the 
execution of the  
business strategy  
over the longer term. 
Rewards sustained 
increase in shareholder 
value1.

Each year RSP awards may be granted. Awards 
normally vest over a three-year period.

A holding period applies to RSP awards which requires 
the Executive Directors to retain the after-tax value of 
shares for 24 months from the vesting date – 
including post cessation of employment.

The maximum opportunity contained within the plan 
rules for RSP awards is 125% of salary (with awards up 
to 150% of salary eligible to be made in exceptional 
circumstances).

The normal maximum face value of annual awards will 
be 125% of base salary for the Chief Executive and 
100% of base salary for other Executive Directors.

Dividend equivalent awards may be made on RSP 
awards that vest and may assume the reinvestment of 
dividends.

Share ownership
To ensure alignment 
between the interests 
of Executive Directors 
and shareholders.

Post-employment 
share ownership 
guideline

The Chief Executive and the Chief Financial Officer are 
expected to build and maintain a holding equivalent to 
250% and 200% of salary respectively over a period of 
five years from appointment. Executive Directors are 
expected to retain 50% of the post-tax shares vesting 
under the Long Term Incentive Plans, the RSP and 
100% of the post-tax deferred bonus shares until the 
guideline is met.
Executive Directors are now required to hold up to 
100% of their shareholding requirement for two years 
after stepping down from the Board in respect of 
shares from incentive awards. 

The Committee retains discretion to waive this 
guideline if it is not considered appropriate in the 
specific circumstances.

Framework used to assess performance and provisions  
for the recovery of sums paid
In line with last year, bonuses are normally based on 
stretching financial and non-financial measures, 
including personal or strategic performance 
measures. 

Performance measures are set and assessed by the 
Committee at its discretion, with performance 
normally measured over a one-year period. 

Financial measures will normally represent the 
majority of the bonus, with other non-financial 
measures representing the balance. 

Safety underpins all of the operational activities of 
the Group and the bonus plan includes a provision 
that enables the Committee to scale back the 
bonus earned (including to zero) in the event that 
there is a safety event which it considers warrants 
the use of such discretion.

The annual bonus plan includes provisions which enable 
the Committee (in respect of both the cash and the 
deferred elements of bonuses) to recover or withhold 
value in the event of certain defined circumstances. 

The Committee may, at its discretion, adjust the 
level of bonus payout if it considers that the payout 
would not reflect the underlying performance of the 
executive, the Group, the experience of 
shareholders, other stakeholders or if such a level 
would not be appropriate in the circumstances.
Awards will be subject to performance underpins 
measured over the vesting periods. If the Company 
does not meet one or more of the underpins the 
Committee would consider whether it was 
appropriate to scale back the level of payout under 
the award to reflect this.

The Committee would retain discretion to determine 
what level of scale back, if any, was appropriate.

The RSP includes provisions which enable the 
Committee to recover or withhold value in the event 
of certain defined circumstances.

The Committee retains discretion to review the 
performance underpins, and to set the triggers for 
each underpin. 

The Committee may, at its discretion, adjust the 
vesting level of an award if it considers that the 
vesting level would not reflect the underlying 
performance of the executive, the Group, the experience 
of shareholders, other stakeholders or if such a level 
would not be appropriate in the circumstances.
Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Outstanding awards under the LTIP will vest in line with the remuneration policy in force at the time of grant.
1.  RSPs will be awarded subject to the approval of scheme rules at the AGM, otherwise we will retain the ability to issue awards based upon the existing LTIP. 

138 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Discretion retained by the 
Committee in operating the 
incentive plans
The Committee will operate the annual 
bonus plan and RSP according to their 
respective rules (or relevant documents) 
and in accordance with the Listing Rules 
where relevant. The Committee retains 
discretion, consistent with market practice, 
in a number of regards to the operation 
and administration of these plans. In 
relation to the annual bonus plan, the 
Committee retains discretion over:

•  the participants;
•  the timing of grant of a payment;
•  the determination of the bonus payment;
•  dealing with a change of control;
•  determination of the treatment of 

leavers based on the rules of the plan 
and the appropriate treatment chosen; 
and

•  the annual review of performance 

measures and weighting, and targets for 
the annual bonus plan from year to year.

In relation to the RSP and annual bonus 
deferred in shares, the Committee retains 
discretion on the following:

•  the participants;
•  the timing of grant of an award;
•  the size of an award;
•  the determination of vesting;
•  the payment vehicle of the award/

payment;

•  a change of control or restructuring of 

the Group;

•  determination of the treatment of 

leavers based on the rules of the plan 
and the appropriate treatment chosen;

•  adjustments required in certain 

circumstances (e.g. rights issues, 
corporate restructuring events and 
special dividends).

In relation to both the Group’s RSP and the 
annual bonus plan, the Committee retains 
the ability to adjust the targets (in the case 
of the annual bonus) or underpins (in the 
case of the RSP) and/or set different 
measures if events occur which cause it to 
determine that the conditions are no longer 
appropriate (e.g. material acquisition and/or 
divestment of a Group business), and the 
amendment is required so that the 
conditions achieve their original purpose 
and are not materially less difficult to 
satisfy.

Any use of the above discretions would be 
explained in the Annual Report on 
Remuneration and may be the subject of 
consultation with the Company’s major 
shareholders.

The use of discretion in relation to the 
Group’s Save As You Earn, and Share 
Incentive Plans will be as permitted under 
HMRC rules and the Listing Rules.

Details of share awards granted to existing 
Executive Directors are set out on 
page 147. These remain eligible to vest 
based on their original award terms.

Malus and clawback provisions are included 
in all incentives: the annual bonus (up to 
three years from date of award), and the 
RSP (up to six years from the date of 
award). The circumstances in which malus 
and clawback could apply may include 
some or all of the following as determined 
by the Board:

•  A material misstatement resulting in an 
adjustment to the Company’s audited 
consolidated accounts

•  The determination of the number of 
shares subject to an award or the 
assessment of any performance 
condition was in error or based on 
inaccurate or misleading information
•  The Board determining in its reasonable 

opinion that any action or conduct of the 
participant amounts to serious 
misconduct, fraud, or gross misconduct
•  That there has been a material failure of 

risk management 

•  That there has been a safety incident 
which has damaged the reputation of 
the Company to a material extent

•  That there has been serious reputational 

damage 

•  That there has been a material corporate 

failure or

•  Any other circumstances which the 

Board in its discretion considers to be 
appropriate

Performance metrics and target 
setting
The choice of the performance metrics 
applicable to the annual bonus plan reflect 
the Committee’s belief that any incentive 
compensation should be appropriately 
challenging and tied to the delivery of a 
blend of key financial and non-financial 
measures. These bonus measures are 
intended to ensure that Executive Directors 
are incentivised to deliver across a range of 
objectives for which they are accountable. 
Financial measures will normally be used for 
the majority of the bonus and will be 
selected in order to provide a clear 
indication of how successful the Group has 
been in managing operations effectively 
overall. The remainder of the bonus may be 
based on key operational or strategic 
objectives, which are set annually.

Since safety is of central importance to the 
business, the award of any bonus is subject 
to an underpin that enables the Committee 
to reduce the bonus earned (including to 
zero) in the event that there is a safety 
event that it considers warrants the use of 
such discretion.

RSP awards are subject to performance 
underpins. These are intended to represent 
a minimum level of performance below 
which vesting may not be appropriate. 
The performance underpins will normally  
be linked to key financial, operational or 
governance minimum standards. Underpins 
are set taking into account what would be 
considered to be a minimum acceptable 
level of performance. 

The Committee has retained flexibility on 
the specific measures which can be used 
for the annual bonus plan and the 
underpins for the RSP to ensure that they 
will be fully aligned with the strategic 
imperatives prevailing at the time they are 
set. Performance targets are set taking into 
account internal and external expectations 
of performance to align with our 
remuneration philosophy and principles. 

No performance targets are set for Save 
As You Earn awards since these are 
purposefully designed to encourage 
employees across the Group to purchase 
shares in the Company. A measure of 
Group performance based on financial and 
operational targets set in the prior year is 
used in determining awards under the 
Share Incentive Plan.

Historical awards
The Committee reserves the right to make 
any remuneration payments and/or 
payments for loss of office (including 
exercising any discretions available to it in 
connection with such payments) 
notwithstanding that they are not in line 
with the policy set out above where the 
terms of the payment were agreed (i) 
before the policy set out above came into 
effect, provided that the terms of the 
payment were consistent with any 
applicable shareholder-approved Directors’ 
remuneration policy in force at the time 
they were agreed or where otherwise 
approved by shareholders; or (ii) at a time 
when the relevant individual was not a 
Director of the Company (or other persons 
to whom the policy set out above applies) 
and, in the opinion of the Committee, the 
payment was not in consideration for the 
individual becoming a Director of the 
Company or such other person. For these 
purposes ‘payments’ include the 
Committee satisfying awards of variable 
remuneration and, in relation to an award 
over shares, the terms of the payment are 
‘agreed’ no later than the time the award is 
granted. This policy applies equally to any 
individual who is required to be treated as a 
Director under the applicable regulations.

www.easyJet.com

139

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REMUNERATIO N  R EPORT  (CONTI NUE D)

Differences in pay policy for 
Executive Directors compared to 
other easyJet employees 
In line with the Group’s policy to keep 
remuneration simple, aligned, and 
performance-based, the benefit and 
pension arrangements for the current 
Executive Directors are typically on broadly 
the same terms as those offered to eligible 
UK employees in the wider workforce. In 
addition, all employees have the 
opportunity to participate in a number of 
broad-based share plans. 

However, the overall remuneration policy 
for the Executive Directors is more heavily 
weighted towards variable and share-based 
pay than for other employees. This is to 
ensure that a greater proportion of 
executive pay is linked directly to the 
creation of value for shareholders. This 
approach is to create a clear link between 
the value created for shareholders and  
the remuneration received by the  
Executive Directors.

Illustration of how much the 
Executive Directors could earn 
under the remuneration policy 
The charts below show how much the 
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer 
could earn through easyJet’s remuneration 
policy under different performance 
scenarios in the 2022 financial year. The 
following assumptions have been made: 

Minimum (performance below threshold) 
– fixed pay only, with no vesting under any 
of easyJet’s incentive plans.

Mid (performance in line with expectations) 
– fixed pay plus a bonus at the mid-point 
of the range (giving 50% of the maximum 
opportunity), plus 100% vesting of the 
Restricted Share Plan. 

Maximum (performance meets or exceeds 
maximum) – fixed pay plus maximum 
bonus, plus 100% vesting of the Restricted 
Share Plan. 

Fixed pay comprises: 

Salaries – salary effective as at 1 January 
2022.

Benefits – amount received in the 2022 
financial year.

Pension – employer contributions or 
cash-equivalent payments received in the 
2022 financial year.

Matching Shares under the all-employee 
Share Incentive Plan.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE (JOHAN LUNDGREN)1
Minimum

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (KENTON JARVIS)2
Minimum

100%

£800,000

Mid

100%

£566,000

Mid

32%

30%

38%

£2,465,000

37%

30%

34%

£1,541,000

Maximum

Maximum

25%

46%

29%

£3,205,000

28%

46%

26%

£1,996,000

Maximum + share price growth (50%)

Maximum + share price growth (50%)

22%

40%

25% 13%

£3,667,000

25%

40%

23% 12%

£2,256,000

Fixed pay

Annual bonus

RSP

Fixed pay

Annual bonus

RSP

Change in share price

Change in share price

1.  Were easyJet’s share price to increase by 50%, Johan Lundgren’s total remuneration would increase to £3,667k under a ‘maximum’ scenario – driven by 

the increased value of the RSP awards

2.  Were easyJet’s share price to increase by 50%, Kenton Jarvis’ total remuneration would increase to £2,256k under a ‘maximum’ scenario – driven by the 

increased value of the RSP awards

The scenarios shown above do not include any dividend assumptions. It should be noted that since the analysis above shows what could 
be earned by the Executive Directors based on the remuneration policy described above (ignoring the potential impact of share price 
growth), these numbers will differ to values included in the table on page 145 detailing the actual earnings by Executive Directors.

140 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Executive Directors’ terms of 
employment
The Group’s policy is for Executive 
Directors to have service contracts which 
may be terminated with no more than 12 
months’ notice from either party.

The Executive Directors’ service contracts 
are available for inspection by shareholders 
at the Company’s registered office.

Approach to leavers
If notice is served by either party, the 
Executive Director can continue to receive 
basic salary, benefits and pension for the 
duration of their notice period, during 
which time the business may require the 
individual to continue to fulfil their  
current duties or may assign a period  
of garden leave.

A payment in lieu of notice may be made, 
and, in this event, the Committee’s normal 
policy is to make the payment in up to 12 
monthly instalments which may be reduced 
if alternative employment is taken up 
during this period.

For good leavers, bonus payments may be 
made on a pro-rata basis, but only for the 
period of time served from the start of the 
financial year to the date of termination, 
and not for any period in lieu of notice. Any 
bonus paid would be subject to the normal 
bonus targets, tested at the end of the 
financial year.

In relation to a termination of employment, 
the Committee may make any payment in 
relation to statutory entitlements or to 
settle or compromise claims in connection 
with a termination of any existing or future 
Executive Director as necessary. The 
Committee also retains the discretion to 
reimburse reasonable legal expenses 
incurred in relation to a termination of 
employment and to meet any 
outplacement costs if deemed necessary.

The rules of the Company’s share plans set 
out what happens to awards if a participant 
ceases to be an employee or Director of 
easyJet before the end of the vesting 
period. Generally, any outstanding share 
awards will lapse on such cessation, except 
in certain circumstances.

If an Executive Director ceases to be an 
employee or Director of easyJet as a result 
of death, injury, retirement, the sale of the 
business or company that employs the 
individual, or any other reason at the 
discretion of the Committee, then they will 
be treated as a ‘good leaver’ under the 
relevant plan’s rules. Under the deferred 
bonus, the shares for a good leaver will 
normally vest in full on the normal vesting 
date (or on cessation of employment in the 
case of death) and if the award is in the 
form of an option, there is a 12 month 

window in which the award can be 
exercised. Awards structured as options 
which have vested prior to cessation can 
be exercised within 12 months of cessation 
of office or employment.

Under the RSP, a good leaver’s unvested 
awards will vest (either on the normal 
vesting date or the relevant date of 
cessation, if determined by the Committee) 
subject to achievement of the performance 
underpin, with a pro-rata reduction to 
reflect the proportion of the vesting period 
served. The holding period shall normally 
continue to apply. The Committee has the 
discretion to dis-apply time pro-rating if it 
considers it appropriate to do so. A good 
leaver may exercise their vested awards 
structured as options for a period of 12 
months following the individual’s cessation 
of office or employment. Unvested  
awards may be exercised within  
12 months of vesting.

Under the LTIP (the plan under which 
awards were granted up to and including 
2020), a good leaver’s unvested awards will 
vest (either on the normal vesting date or 
the relevant date of cessation, as 
determined by the Committee) subject to 
achievement of any relevant performance 
conditions, with a pro-rata reduction to 
reflect the proportion of the vesting period 
served. The holding period shall normally 
continue to apply. The Committee has the 
discretion to dis-apply time pro-rating if it 
considers it appropriate to do so. A good 
leaver may exercise their vested awards 
structured as options for a period of 12 
months following the individual’s cessation 
of office or employment. Unvested  
awards may be exercised within 12 months 
of vesting.

In determining whether an Executive 
Director should be treated as a good 
leaver, and the extent to which their award 
may vest, the Committee will take into 
account the circumstances of an 
individual’s departure.

In the event of a takeover or winding-up  
of easyJet plc (which is not part of an 
internal reorganisation of the easyJet 
Group, in circumstances where equivalent 
replacement awards are not granted) all 
awards will vest taking into account the 
achievement of any relevant performance 
underpins (in the case of the RSP)/ 
performance conditions (in the case of the 
LTIP) with a pro-rata reduction to reflect 
the proportion of the vesting period served. 
The Committee has discretion to dis-apply 
time pro-rating if it considers it appropriate 
to do so. In the event of a takeover, the 
Committee may determine, with the 
agreement of the acquiring company, that 
awards will be exchanged for equivalent 
awards in another company.

Policy on external appointments
Executive Directors are permitted to 
accept appropriate outside non-executive 
director appointments so long as the 
overall commitment is compatible with 
their duties as Executive Directors and is 
not thought to interfere with the business 
of the Group. Any fees received in respect 
of these appointments are normally 
retained directly by the relevant  
Executive Director.

Approach to determining 
remuneration on recruitment
Base salary levels will normally be set in 
accordance with easyJet’s remuneration 
policy as well as taking into account the 
experience and calibre of the individual. 
Benefits will normally be provided in 
accordance with easyJet’s remuneration 
policy taking into account those offered to 
other employees. Where an Executive 
Director is required to relocate from their 
home location to take up their role, the 
Committee may provide assistance with 
relocation (via either one-off or ongoing 
payments or benefits).

The maximum level of variable pay that 
may be offered on an ongoing basis and 
the structure of remuneration will be in 
accordance with the approved policy 
detailed above, i.e. at an aggregate 
maximum of up to 325% of salary (200% 
annual bonus and 125% under the RSP) and 
350% in exceptional circumstances (200% 
annual bonus and 150% under the RSP), 
taking into account annual and long term 
variable pay. This limit does not include the 
value of any buy-out arrangements. 

Different performance measures may be 
set initially for the annual bonus, taking into 
account the responsibilities of the 
individual, and the point in the financial year 
that they joined. RSP awards can be made 
shortly following an appointment (assuming 
the Company is not in a closed period).

The above policy applies to both an internal 
promotion to the Board or an external hire.

Where an individual forfeits outstanding 
variable pay opportunities or contractual 
rights at a previous employer as a result of 
appointment, the Committee may offer 
compensatory payments or awards if  
after careful consideration it is determined 
that it is appropriate to offer a buy-out. 
Any buy-out may be in such form as the 
Committee considers appropriate, taking 
into account relevant factors including the 
form of awards, expected value and 
vesting timeframe of forfeited 
opportunities.

www.easyJet.com

141

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REMUNERATIO N  R EPORT  (CONTI NUE D)

To the extent that it was not possible or 
practical to provide the buy-out within the 
terms of the Company’s existing incentive 
plans, a bespoke arrangement may be 
used (including granting an award under 
the Listing Rule 9.4.2 which allows for the 
granting of awards, to facilitate, in unusual 
circumstances, the recruitment of an 
Executive Director). 

In the case of an internal promotion, any 
outstanding variable pay awarded in 
relation to the previous role will be paid 
according to its terms of grant (adjusted as 
relevant to take into account the Board 
appointment). 

On the appointment of a new Chairman or 
Non-Executive Director, fees will be set 
taking into account the experience and 
calibre of the individual. Where specific 
cash or share arrangements are delivered 

to Non-Executive Directors, these will not 
include share options or other 
performance-related elements. 

The Board evaluation and succession 
planning processes in place are designed to 
ensure there is the correct balance of skills, 
experience, and knowledge on the Board. 
The activities of the Nominations 
Committee overseeing these matters are 
disclosed in the Nominations Committee 
report on pages 121 to 123.

Non-Executive Director fees
The Non-Executive Directors receive an annual fee (normally paid in monthly instalments). The fee for the Non-Executive Chairman is set 
by the Remuneration Committee and the fees for the other Non-Executive Directors are approved by the Board, on the 
recommendation of the Chairman and Chief Executive.

Element

Purpose and link to strategy

Operation (including maximum levels where applicable)

Fees

To attract and retain a high 
calibre Chairman, Deputy 
Chairman and Non-Executive 
Directors by offering market-
competitive fee levels

The Chairman is paid an all-inclusive fee for all Board responsibilities.

The other Non-Executive Directors receive a basic Board fee, with supplementary 
fees payable for additional responsibilities including Board or Committee 
responsibilities.

The Chairman and Non-Executive Directors do not participate in any of the Group’s 
incentive arrangements.

Fee levels are reviewed on a regular basis, and may be increased, taking into account 
factors such as the time commitment of the role and market levels in companies of 
comparable size and complexity.

Flexibility is retained to exceed current fee levels if it is necessary to do so in order to 
appoint a new Chairman or Non-Executive Director of an appropriate calibre.

In exceptional circumstances, if there is a temporary yet material increase in the time 
commitments for Non-Executive Directors, the Board may pay extra fees to 
recognise the additional workload.

Necessary expenses incurred will be reimbursed so that the Chairman and Non-
Executive Directors are not worse off, on a net of tax basis, as a result of fulfilling 
Company duties.

No other benefits or remuneration are provided to the Chairman or Non-Executive 
Directors. Selected benefits may be introduced if considered appropriate.

Terms of appointment of the Non-Executive Directors
The terms of appointment of the Chairman and the other Non-Executive Directors are recorded in letters of appointment. The required 
notice from the Company is three months. The Non-Executive Directors are not entitled to any compensation on loss of office.

The Non-Executive Directors’ letters of appointment are available for inspection by shareholders at the Company’s registered office.

UK Corporate Governance Code – Provision 40 disclosures
When developing the proposed remuneration policy and considering its implementation for 2022, the Committee was mindful of the UK 
Corporate Governance Code and considers that the executive remuneration framework appropriately addresses the following factors:

•  Clarity – The Committee is committed to providing open and transparent disclosures regarding our executive remuneration 

arrangements. 

•  Simplicity – Remuneration arrangements for our Executives and our wider workforce are simple in nature and well understood by both 

participants and shareholders. Our proposed RSP would further simplify incentive arrangements.

•  Risk – The Committee considers that the incentive arrangements do not encourage inappropriate risk-taking. Malus and clawback 
provisions apply to annual bonus and RSP awards, and the Committee has overarching discretion to adjust formulaic outcomes to 
ensure that they are appropriate.

•  Predictability and proportionality – The proposed RSP increases the predictability of outcomes in line with recovery strategy and 
minimises the potential of unintended outcomes. Our policy illustrates opportunity levels for Executive Directors under various 
scenarios for each component of pay.

•  Alignment to culture – Any financial and strategic targets set by the Committee are designed to drive the right behaviours across the 
business. The proposed RSP encourages our executives to focus on making the right decisions for the execution of our strategy and 
the creation of long term shareholder value.

142 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Annual report on remuneration

Role of the Remuneration Committee
The key role of the Committee is to make recommendations to the Board on executive remuneration packages and to ensure that 
remuneration policy and practices of the Company reward fairly and responsibly, with a clear link to corporate and individual 
performance. The Committee’s terms of reference can be found on the Company’s website at https://corporate.easyjet.com.

Membership, meetings, and attendance
•  Moni Mannings (Chair from 8 October 2020) 
•  Charles Gurassa (until 23 December 2020)
•  Moya Greene DBE (Chair until 8 October 2020 and member until 23 December 2020)
•  Julie Southern
•  David Robbie (from 17 November 2020)

There were three changes to the membership of the Committee during the year as set out above. The Company Secretary acts as 
Secretary of the Committee. Other key invitees include the Chief Executive, the Group People Director, the Reward Director, the Chief 
Financial Officer, and external advisers as relevant.

Member biographies setting out their skills and experience can be found on pages 98 to 101. The Committee met five times during the 
year. Meeting attendance can be found in the table on page 112. 

Key responsibilities
•  To set the remuneration policy for all Executive Directors and the Company’s Chairman
•  To set the remuneration packages for the AMB and monitor the principles and structure of remuneration for other senior management 
•  To oversee remuneration and workforce policies and practices, and take these into account when setting the policy for Director and 

AMB remuneration

•  To approve the design of, and determine targets for, all employee share schemes operated by the Group
•  To oversee any major changes in employee benefit structures throughout the Company or Group
•  To review and monitor the Group’s compliance with relevant gender pay reporting requirements
•  To assess that all incentives implemented are consistent with company culture and purpose

Key activities during the year 
•  Appointed Deloitte as external advisers with effect from 21 January 2021, replacing the previous advisers Willis Towers Watson
•  Assessed the level of performance in respect of the bonus for the 2021 financial year, and LTIP awards set in December 2018 and 

vesting in December 2021, to determine appropriate pay-outs

•  Monitored the developments in the internal and external environment and in relation to the impact of Covid-19
•  Reviewed and approved the remuneration packages for the new AMB members 
•  Reviewed the total packages and service contracts of the AMB and senior management
•  Considered the results and implications of the UK gender pay gap report and reviewed and commented on recommendations to 

address the gap and challenges faced by the aviation sector

•  Reviewed and approved no payment of the all-employee Performance Share Award in respect of the 2021 financial year and cessation 

of selected other all-employee share scheme features

•  Reviewed the provision of long term incentive awards for the Executive Directors and the consideration to move from LTIP awards to a 

Restricted Share Plan (RSP)

On balance, having taken into account a number of internal and external measures as well as the pay ratio analysis, the Committee 
believes the proposed remuneration decisions in this report appropriately reflect the needs of the business and long term interests of 
shareholders. The Committee also believes the remuneration policy operated as intended in terms of reflecting Company performance 
and the overall level of quantum delivered was considered appropriate given the business context. 

www.easyJet.com

143

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REMUNERATIO N  R EPORT  (CONTI NUE D)

Application of the remuneration policy for the 2022 financial year
Salary
The current and proposed salaries of the Executive Directors are:

Johan Lundgren
Kenton Jarvis1

1 January  

2022 salary

 1 January  

2021 salary

Change vs 
1 January 20212

£740,000
£520,000

£740,000
£520,000

0%
0%

1.  Effective on joining 3 February 2021
2. For comparison, the typical rate of salary increases to be awarded to our wider UK workforce will also be 0%

Annual bonus in respect of performance in the 2022 financial year
The maximum bonus opportunity remains at 200% of base salary for the Chief Executive and at 175% for the Chief Financial Officer. 
There will be no change to bonus maximum levels. For the year ended 30 September 2022 the annual bonus will be based on 30% on 
EBITDAR performance, 50% on a balanced scorecard of financial and operational objectives including Free Cash Flow, Ancillary Yield, 
Cost Programme Performance and CSAT and 20% based on individual performance. Individual performance includes measures linked to 
our sustainability strategy, recognising the increasingly importance of this to the business, as well as measures linked to easyJet holiday’s 
performance and employee engagement. The Committee has chosen to use a balanced scorecard approach to assessing performance 
for 50% of the bonus this year to ensure that we are providing a balanced incentive to drive performance across a range of areas. The 
Committee will consider performance against each measure and determine an appropriate total outcome for the scorecard at the end of 
the year. At least 40% of the scorecard will be linked to financial measures ensuring that at least 50% of the overall bonus is linked to 
financial measures. The safety of our customers and people underpins all of the operational activities of the Group and the bonus plan 
includes a provision that enables the Committee to scale back (including to zero) the bonus awarded in the event that a safety event has 
occurred, which it considers warrants the use of such discretion. One-third of the pre-tax bonus earned will be deferred into shares for a 
period of three years and will be subject to continued employment.

Bonus payments may be withheld or recovered if, within a period of three years from the date of payment or at vesting in the case of 
the deferred bonus, there is: a case of serious personal misconduct; a misstatement of accounts; an error in calculation of results; an 
instance of corporate failure; or material damage to the Company’s reputation as a result of a safety event.

RSP awards in relation to the 2022 financial year
As outlined in the Chair’s statement, after careful consideration and consultation with our largest shareholders, the Remuneration 
Committee has concluded that a Restricted Share Plan is the best approach for the Company going forward to support the execution of 
our strategy and the creation of long term shareholder value. 

Subject to shareholder approval of our revised Directors’ remuneration policy at the AGM in February 2022, the Committee intends to 
grant RSP awards to Executive Directors. 

The proposed award levels for the 2022 financial year are 125% of salary for the CEO and 100% of salary for the CFO. 

Awards will vest 100% on the third anniversary of the award and will then be subject to a two-year holding period so that the total time 
horizon is five years for the entire award. 

Awards will be subject to the following performance underpins measured over the vesting periods. If any underpin is not met, the 
Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to reduce the portion of the award vesting, based on its judgement of the context. 
Theproposed underpins are:

1.  That easyJet does not fall below its minimum liquidity target (such that a credit risk is triggered) through the vesting period.
2. Satisfactory governance performance including no ESG issues that result in material reputational damage to the Company 

(asdetermined by the Board).

If the Company does not meet one or more of the underpins the Committee would consider whether it was appropriate to scale back 
the level of payout under the award to reflect this. 

The Committee will operate a further underpin such that if the Company’s performance taken as a whole materially underperforms what 
might reasonably have been expected for the sector for reasons attributable to management action or inaction, the Committee will at its 
discretion reduce the award quantum appropriately.

The Committee would also retain discretion to determine what level of scale back, if any, was appropriate. The Committee also may, at 
its discretion, adjust the vesting level of an award if it considers that the vesting level would not reflect the underlying performance of the 
executive, the Group, the experience of shareholders, other stakeholders or if such level would not be appropriate in the circumstances.

Non-Executive Director fees
The fees for the Chairman and Non-Executive Directors from 1 January 2022 will remain as:

Chairman
Basic fee for other Non-Executive Directors
Fees for SID role1
Chair of the Audit, Safety and Remuneration Committees1
Chair of the Finance Committee1

1.  Supplementary fees.

£314,568
£62,914
£25,000
£15,000
£10,000

Fees payable to the Non-Executive Directors are reviewed annually. The basic fee will not increase from 1 January 2022, which aligns with 
the wider UK workforce pay freeze.

144 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Single total figure of remuneration for the year ended 30 September 2021
The table below sets out the amounts earned by the Directors (audited).

Fees 
and 

£’000 

Salary Benefits7 Bonus

LTIP Pension8

Total

Total  
Fixed

Total 
Variable

Fees 
and 
Salary

Benefits

Bonus

LTIP

Pension

Total

Total  
Fixed

Total 
Variable

2021

2020

Executive
Johan 
Lundgren

Kenton 
Jarvis1

Andrew 
Findlay2

Non-
Executive
John Barton

Stephen 
Hester3

Dr Andreas 
Bierwirth

Catherine 
Bradley CBE

Moya 
Greene DBE4

Charles 
Gurassa4

Dr 
Anastassia 
Lauterbach5

Nicholas 
Leeder

Moni 
Mannings

Andy Martin

David 
Robbie6

Julie 
Southern

Total

740

342

386

315

5

78

73

19

22

16

63

78
–

52

103
2,292

8

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

–
8

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

–
–

46

794

794

21

363

363

22

408

408

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

315

315

5

78

73

19

22

16

63

78
–

52

5

78

73

19

22

16

63

78
–

52

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

698

14

–

513

297

–

74

45

81

84

59

59

10
63

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

–

103
103
89 2,389 2,389

78
–
– 2,061

–
14

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

–
–

43

755

755

–

–

–

32

545

545

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

297

297

–

74

45

81

84

59

59

10
63

–

–

74

45

81

84

59

59

10
63

–

–
75

78

78
2,150 2,150

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

–
–

1.  Appointed Executive Director on 3 February 2021
2.  Stepped down as Executive Director on 3 February 2021, employed until 25 May 2021. Includes payment of £29,615 for accrued holiday.
3.  Appointed to the Board on 1 September 2021 and Chair from 1 December 2021
4. Stepped down from the Board on 23 December 2020
5.  Stepped down from the Board on 21 December 2020
6.  Appointed to Board on 17 November 2020
7.  Benefits relate to the cost to the Company of life assurance cover and the value of all employee shares received during the year under the Company’s 

Share Incentive Plan, as well as reimbursements made to the Chief Executive for business-related travel expenses in respect of domestic car travel to the 
value of £7,790

8.  Johan Lundgren, Kenton Jarvis, and Andrew Findlay received a cash alternative to pension contributions equivalent to 6.15% of base salary

www.easyJet.com

145

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REMUNERATIO N  R EPORT  (CONTI NUE D)

Payments for loss of office and payments to past directors (audited)
Andrew Findlay leaving arrangements
Andrew Findlay stepped down as a Director of easyJet plc and as Chief Financial Officer on 3 February 2021. 

He received his salary and benefits (including pension contribution) on a monthly basis for the duration of his notice period through to 25 
May 2021. He also received a payment on leaving of £29,615 for accrued holiday. All unvested LTIP and deferred bonus share awards 
lapsed on the termination of his employment on 25 May 2021. His vested LTIP and deferred bonus share awards continued to be 
exercisable in accordance with the relevant plan rules until his termination date, at which point any unexercised awards lapsed. He was 
not eligible to receive a bonus for the 2021 financial year and was not granted any further LTIP or deferred bonus share awards. 

Other than the amounts disclosed above, no other remuneration payment was made to Andrew Findlay in the year.

No other payments for loss of office or any other payments have been made to any former Directors during the year.

Annual bonus outturn for performance in the 2021 financial year (audited)
In light of continued market uncertainty, the annual bonus targets were set separately for the first and second half of the 2021 financial 
year to allow flexibility and agility. The measures selected for the bonus aligned with our key priorities for 2021 and were EBITDA (30%), 
cost reduction programme (20%), free cash flow (20%), customer satisfaction (10%) and individual performance (20%).

A sliding scale of financial and operational bonus targets was set at the start of the 2021 financial year. 10% of each element is payable 
for achieving the threshold target, increasing to 50% for on-target performance and 100% for achieving maximum performance. 
Achievements between these points are calculated on a straight-line basis.

Measure

CEO & CFO

Threshold

On-target

Maximum

Threshold

On-target

Maximum

Actual

Payout

EBITDA £m
Cost reduction programme £m
Free cash flow £m
Customer satisfaction 
Individual1
Total

30%
20%
20%
10%
20%
100%

H1 2021 Targets

H2 2021 Targets

H1

H2

(595)
194
(1,156)
75%
n/a

(541) 
216
(1,051) 
77%
50%

(487) 
238
(946)
79%
100%

650
269
260
69%
n/a

722
299
289
71%
50%

794
329
318
73%
100%

(470)
250
(1,336)
80% 
n/a

(91)
262
50
73%
n/a

0%
0%
0%
0%
0%

1. Given that the decision was made not to pay a bonus, individual performance for bonus purposes was not assessed.

Despite the Customer satisfaction target being met, due to the continuing restrictions on airline travel and the impact of this on our 
overall performance no annual bonus in respect of 2021 will be paid.

LTIP (audited) 
The 2018 LTIP awards vesting in respect of the performance years to 30 September 2021 were subject to a combination of performance 
conditions based on three-year average headline ROCE and relative TSR compared to FTSE 51-150 companies measured over the prior 
three financial years. The percentage which could be earned was determined using the following vesting schedule:

Below threshold  
(0% vesting)

Threshold 
(25% vesting)

On-target 
(50% vesting)

Maximum 
(100% vesting)

Actual

Vesting 
(% of element)

ROCE awards (40% of total)
EPS awards (40% of total)

<11.0%
<383p

11.0%
383p

TSR awards (20% of total)

< Median

Median

13.0%
414p

n/a

15.0%
446p
Upper  

quartile

Below threshold
Below threshold

< Median

0%
0%

0%

Three-year average headline EPS and ROCE performance along with TSR performance were below threshold due to the impact of 
Covid-19 on the business. The Committee considered this outcome and determined that no payment was an appropriate outcome given 
the current business context. 

146 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Executive Directors’ share awards outstanding at the financial year end (audited)
Details of share options and share awards outstanding at the financial year end are shown in the following tables:

JOHAN LUNDGREN

No. of shares/ 
options at 
30 September 
2020

Shares/ 
options 
granted 
in year

Rights 
issue
adjustment1

Shares/ 
options 
lapsed 
in year

Shares/ 
options 
exercised 
in year

No. of shares/ 
options at 
30 September 
2021

Scheme

Date of grant

Market 
price on 
exercise 
date 
(£)

Exercise 
price 
(£)

A
A
A
A
B
B
C
D

134,350
167,003
129,461
–
26,871
5,282
282
1,571

–
–
–
214,369
–
–
–
–

– (134,350)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

31,358
24,309
40,252
5,045
991
49
294

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

19 Dec 20174
–
19 Dec 20185
198,361
19 Dec 20196
153,770
254,621 29 Dec 20207
19 Dec 2018
19 Dec 2019
5 Apr 2019
14 Jun 2019

31,916
6,273
331
1,8653

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6.751

KENTON JARVIS

No. of shares/ 
options at 
30 September 
2020

Shares/ 
options 
granted 
in year

Rights 
issue
adjustment1

Shares/ 
options 
lapsed 
in year

Shares/ 
options 
exercised 
in year

–
–

134,541
1,653

25,262
310

–
–

–
–

Scheme

A
D

ANDREW FINDLAY2

No. of shares/ 
options at 
30 September 
2021

Date of grant
159,803 20 May 20218
20 Jul 2021

1,9633

Exercise 
price 
(£)

–
6.421

Date from which 
exercisable

19 Dec 2020
19 Dec 2021
19 Dec 2022
29 Dec 2023
19 Dec 2021
19 Dec 2022
5 Apr 2022
1 Aug 2022

Expiry date

19 Dec 2027
19 Dec 2028
19 Dec 2029
29 Dec 2030
19 Dec 2028
19 Dec 2029
n/a
1 Feb 2023

Date from which 
exercisable

Expiry date

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

Market 
price on 
exercise 
date 
(£)

–
–

29 Dec 2023
1 Sep 2024

29 Dec 2030
1 Mar 2025

No. of shares/ 
options at 
30 September 
2020

Shares/ 
options 
granted 
in year

Rights 
issue 
adjustment1

12,789
557

–
–

n/a
n/a

Shares/ 
options 
lapsed 
in year

–
(557)

Shares/ 
options 
exercised 
in year

(12,789)
–

Scheme

B
D

No. of shares/ 
options at  
30 September 
2021

–
–

Date of grant

19 Dec 20174
15 Jun 2017

Exercise  
price 
(£)

–
9.69

Market 
price on 
exercise 
date 
(£)

Date from which 
exercisable

Expiry date

9.99
–

19 Dec 2020
1 Aug 2020

19 Dec 2027
1 Feb 2021

The closing share price of the Company’s ordinary shares at 30 September 2021 was £6.63 and the closing price range during the year 
ended 30 September 2021 was £3.96 to £11.67.

Key:

A Long Term Incentive Plan – Performance Shares
B Deferred Share Bonus Plan
C Share Incentive Plan – Performance (Free) Shares
D Save As You Earn Awards (SAYE)

Note 1: Adjustments
Formulaic adjustments were made during the year as a result of the rights issue in September 2021

Note 2: Andrew Findlay
Stepped down from the Board on 3 February 2021

Note 3: Number of share awards granted
The number of shares is calculated according to the scheme rules of individual plans based on the middle-market closing share price on 
the day prior to grant. As is usual market practice, the option price for SAYE awards is determined by the Committee in advance of the 
award by reference to the share price following announcement of the half year results the day immediately preceding the date the 
invitations are sent.

www.easyJet.com

147

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REMUNERATIO N  R EPORT  (CONTI NUE D)

Note 4: LTIP awards made in December 2017
40% of vesting is based on three-year average Headline ROCE (including lease adjustment) performance for the three financial years 
ending 30 September 2020; 40% of vesting is based on three-year total Headline EPS performance for the three financial years ending 
30 September 2020; and 20% of vesting is based on relative TSR performance compared to companies ranked FTSE 51-150.

The face value of the award granted was £1,850,000 (250% of base salary) to Johan Lundgren. The below targets applied for these 
awards and as none of the targets were met, the options have all lapsed within the year: 

Vested in December 2020

ROCE awards (40% of total award)
EPS awards (40% of total award)
TSR awards (20% of total award)

Below threshold 
(0% vesting)

Threshold (25% 
vesting)

Target (50% 
vesting)

Maximum (100% 
vesting)

<9.0%
< 278p
< Median

9.0%
278p
Median

11.2%
310p

13.0%
335p
n/a Upper quartile

Note 5: LTIP awards made in December 2018
40% of vesting is based on three-year average Headline ROCE (including lease adjustment) performance for the three financial years 
ending 30 September 2021; 40% of vesting is based on three-year total headline EPS performance for the three financial years ending 
30 September 2021; and 20% of vesting is based on relative TSR performance compared to companies ranked FTSE 51-150. In addition, 
the TSR awards will not vest unless there has been positive TSR over the performance period. 

The face value of the award granted was £1,800,300 (250% of salary) to Johan Lundgren. The below targets applied for these awards 
and as none of the targets were met, the options will now lapse:

Vesting in December 2021

ROCE awards (40% of total award)
EPS awards (40% of total award)
TSR awards (20% of total award)

Below threshold 
(0% vesting)

Threshold 
(25% vesting)

Target 
(50% vesting)

Maximum 
(100% vesting)

< 11.0%
< 383p
< Median

 11.0%
 383p
 Median

13.0%
414p

15.0%
446p
n/a Upper quartile

Note 6: LTIP awards made in December 2019
40% of vesting is based on three-year average Headline ROCE (including lease adjustment) performance for the three financial years 
ending 30 September 2022; 40% of vesting is based on three-year total headline EPS performance for the three financial years ending 
30 September 2022; and 20% of vesting is based on relative TSR performance compared to companies ranked FTSE 51-150. In addition, 
the TSR awards will not vest unless there has been positive TSR over the performance period. 

The face value of the award granted was £1,850,000 (250% of salary) to Johan Lundgren. The following targets apply for this award:

Vesting in December 2022

ROCE awards (40% of total award)
EPS awards (40% of total award)
TSR awards (20% of total award)

Below threshold 
(0% vesting)

Threshold 
(25% vesting)

Target 
(50% vesting)

Maximum 
(100% vesting)

<9.5%
<288p
< Median

 9.5%
288p
 Median

11.5%
310p

13.5%
335p
n/a Upper quartile

148 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Note 7: LTIP awards made in December 2020
The face value of the award granted to Johan Lundgren was £1,850,000 (250% of salary). The award is based 100% on TSR 
performance compared to companies from the FTSE 51-151 and will vest on 29 December 2023. In addition, the TSR awards will not vest 
unless there has been positive TSR over the performance period. 

Note 8: LTIP awards made in May 2021
The face value of the award granted to Kenton Jarvis was £1,040,000 (200% of salary). The award is based 100% on TSR performance 
compared to companies from the FTSE 51-151 and will vest on 29 December 2023. In addition, the TSR awards will not vest unless there 
has been positive TSR over the performance period. 

Shareholding guidelines in the 2021 financial year (audited)
In 2021 the shareholding guidelines increased with the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer expected to build up a shareholding of 
250% and 200% of salary respectively (from 200% and 175%), over the first five years from appointment to the Board. The Committee 
has discretion to extend the five-year timeframe in certain circumstances, for example where there have been limited payouts under the 
incentive schemes. Until the guideline is met, Executive Directors are required to retain 50% of net vested shares from the LTIP and RSP 
and 100% of net vested deferred bonus shares. Similarly, the Non-Executive Directors, including the Chairman of the Board, are required 
to build up a shareholding of 100% of annual fees over a period of five years from appointment. All directors participated in the rights 
issue that took place in September 2021 and details of their holdings are set out overleaf.

www.easyJet.com

149

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REMUNERATIO N  R EPORT  (CONTI NUE D)

Directors’ current shareholdings and interests in shares (audited)
The following table provides details on current Directors’ interests in shares at 30 September 2021 (unless otherwise noted).

John Barton
Stephen Hester6
Johan Lundgren10
Kenton Jarvis5
Andrew Findlay7
Dr Andreas Bierwirth 
Catherine Bradley CBE
Moya Greene DBE8
Charles Gurassa8
Dr Anastassia Lauterbach9
Nicholas Leeder
Moni Mannings
David Robbie
Julie Southern

Unconditionally 
owned shares1

Shareholding 
guidelines 
achieved2

Deferred  
bonus

74,680
73,000
66,382
–
71,017
8,715
2,489
14,439
108,439
–
3,847
4,351
16,596
7,451

100%
100%
34%
–
100%
100%
39%
100%
100%
–
57%
35%
100%
61%

–
–
38,189
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

LTIP3

–
–
606,752
159,803
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

SAYE

–
–
1,865
1,963
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

Interests in share 
schemes 

Total interest in 
share schemes

–
–
647,137
161,808
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

SIP4

–
–
331
42
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

1.  Includes SIP Partnership Shares, vested SIP Performance (Free) Shares, vested SIP Matching Shares, and any shares owned by connected persons
2.  Based on unconditionally owned shares and post-tax value of share interests under the deferred bonus plan as per the Committee’s policy on 

shareholding guidelines

3.  LTIP shares are granted in the form of nil cost options subject to performance
4. Consists of unvested SIP Performance (Free) Shares and unvested SIP Matching Shares
5.  Kenton Jarvis was appointed to the Board on 3 February 2021
6.  Stephen Hester was appointed to the Board on 1 September 2021 
7.  As at 3 February 2021, the date Andrew Findlay stepped down from the Board
8.  As at 23 December 2020, the date Moya Greene DBE and Charles Gurassa stepped down from the Board 
9.  As at 21 December 2020, the date Anastassia Lauterbach stepped down from the Board
10.  Shareholding guideline increased from 200% to 250% during the year. Given the participation in the rights issue, and the limited incentive payouts over 

the last four years, the Committee is currently satisfied with the progress being made towards meeting the shareholding guidelines.

Changes in share ownership levels throughout the year may be found on our corporate website https://corporate.easyjet.com.

Executive Directors are deemed to be interested in the unvested shares held by the easyJet Share Incentive Plan and the easyJet plc 
Employee Benefit Trust. At 30 September 2021, ordinary shares held in the Trusts were as follows:

easyJet Share Incentive Plan Trust
easyJet plc Employee Benefit Trust

Total

Number of 
ordinary shares

1,774,800
288,258

2,063,058

Changes since the year end: as at 29 November 2021, there were no changes to the easyJet plc Share Incentive Plan Trust balance and 
the easyJet plc Employee Benefit Trust held 281,899 shares.

Dilution limits
easyJet complies with the Investment Association’s Principles of Remuneration with regard to dilution limits. These principles require that 
commitments under all of the Company’s share incentive schemes must not exceed 10% of the issued share capital in any rolling 10-year 
period. Share awards under all current incentive plans are within the Company’s maximum 10% dilution limit.

Employee share plan participation
A key component of easyJet’s reward philosophy is to provide share ownership opportunities throughout the Group by making annual 
awards of performance-related shares to all eligible employees. In addition, easyJet operates a voluntary discounted share purchase 
arrangement for all employees via a Save As You Earn scheme and a Buy As You Earn arrangement with matching shares in the UK 
under the tax-approved Share Incentive Plan. A 20% discount was offered on Save As You Earn 2021, however, Matching Shares remain 
suspended. 

150 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Details of Directors’ service contracts and letters of appointment
Details of the service contracts and letters of appointment in place as at 30 September 2021 for Directors are as follows:

John Barton
Stephen Hester
Johan Lundgren
Kenton Jarvis 
Dr Andreas Bierwirth
Catherine Bradley CBE
Nicholas Leeder
Moni Mannings
David Robbie
Julie Southern

 Date of 
appointment

Date of current 
service contract

Unexpired term at 
30 September 2021

1 May 2013
1 September 2021
1 December 2017
3 February 2021
22 July 2014
 1 January 2020
1 January 2019
6 August 2020
17 November 2020
1 August 2018

3 May 2016
20 August 2021
10 November 2017
15 September 2020
19 July 2017
9 December 2019
14 December 2018
5 August 2020
16 November 2020
7 June 2018

Letters of appointment for 
the Non-Executive Directors 
do not contain fixed term 
periods; however, they are 
appointed in the expectation 
that they will serve for a 
maximum of nine years, 
subject to satisfactory 
performance and re-election 
at AGMs.

Review of past performance
The chart below sets out the TSR performance of the Company relative to the FTSE 250, FTSE 100, and a group of European airlines1 
since 30 September 2011. The FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 were chosen as easyJet has been a member of both indices during the period.

This graph shows the value, by 30 September 2021, of £100 invested in easyJet on 30 September 2011, compared with the value of £100 
invested in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 Indices or a comparator group of airlines on the same date.

The other points plotted are the values at intervening financial year ends. Overseas companies have been tracked in their local currency, 
i.e. ignoring exchange rate movements since 30 September 2011.

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

30 Sep 2011

30 Sep 2012

30 Sep 2013

30 Sep 2014

30 Sep 2015

30 Sep 2016

30 Sep 2017

30 Sep 2018

30 Sep 2019

30 Sep 2020

30 Sep 2021

easyJet

FTSE 100 Index

FTSE 250 Index

Comparator Airlines

1. Lufthansa, Ryanair, Air France-KLM, and Wizz Air have all been included in the comparative European airlines group. Wizz Air has been 
tracked from listing.

www.easyJet.com

151

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REMUNERATIO N  R EPORT  (CONTI NUE D)

Chief Executive total remuneration table 
The table below shows the total remuneration figure for the Chief Executive over the same 10-year period. The total remuneration figure 
includes the annual bonus and LTIP awards which vested based on performance in those years.

The annual bonus and LTIP vesting percentages show the payout for each year as a percentage of the maximum.

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Single total figure of 
remuneration (£’000)

Annual bonus (%)

LTIP vesting (%)

Johan 
Lundgren
Carolyn 
McCall
Johan 
Lundgren
Carolyn 
McCall
Johan 
Lundgren
Carolyn 
McCall

– 

 – 

 – 

– 

 – 

 – 

1,500

1,006

7551

794

3,694

7,777

9,2095

6,2414

1,4533

757

125

– 

 – 

 – 

– 

 – 

 – 

– 

 – 

 – 

73%

16%

0%

0%

96%

87%

76%

66%

13%

0%

 – 

– 

 – 

 – 

 – 

– 

92%

100%

100%

100%

32%

0%

 – 

 – 

 – 

– 

 – 

– 

 – 

 – 

0%

0%

 – 

 – 

1.  This amount is after the voluntary 20% reduction in base salary during April, May, and June 2020
2.   Johan Lundgren was appointed to the Board on 1 December 2017 and Carolyn McCall stepped down from the Board on 30 November 2017
3.   Includes 48,509 LTIP shares (inclusive of dividend equivalents) at the vesting date share price of £10.43, a decrease of 30% on the share price at grant of 

£14.99

4.  Includes 266,899 LTIP shares vesting for the period; share price is £17.15 (the actual share price at vesting), an increase of 133% on the share price at grant 

of £7.37

5.   Includes 445,575 LTIP shares vesting for the period; share price was £16.71 (the actual share price at vesting), an increase of 325% on the share price at 

grant of £3.93

Change in Directors’ pay for the year in comparison to that for easyJet employees
The table below shows the year-on-year percentage change in salary, benefits and annual bonus earned between the year ended 30 
September 2021 and the year ended 30 September 2020 for the Directors, compared to the average earnings of all other easyJet UK 
employees.

Johan Lundgren1
Kenton Jarvis2
Andrew Findlay1,3
John Barton1,3
Stephen Hester4
Dr Andreas Bierwirth1
Catherine Bradley CBE1,9
Moya Greene DBE1,5
Charles Gurassa1,5
Dr Anastassia Lauterbach1,6
Nicholas Leeder1
Moni Mannings8
Andy Martin1
David Robbie7
Julie Southern1,10
Average pay based on easyJet’s UK employees11

Salary

6.0%
–
(24.8)%
6.1%
– 
5.4%
62.2%
(76.5)%
(73.8)%
(72.9)%
6.8%
680.0%
 – 
–
32.1%
0%

2021
Benefits12

(43)%
– 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 –
 –
 –
 –
 –
 – 
 –
 –
0%

Annual bonus13

Salary

Benefits

Annual bonus

2020

 – 
– 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 – 
 –
 –
0%

(2.6)%
–
1.0%
(2.6)%
–
(2.6)%
–
19.1%
(16.8)%
28.3%
28.3%
–
(11.3)%
–
8.3%
2.0%

0%
– 
0%
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
0%

(100)%
– 
(100)%
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
(100)%

1.  Voluntary 20% reduction between April to June 2020
2.  Appointed Executive Director on 3 February 2021
3.  Stepped down as Executive Director on 3 February 2021, employed until 25 May 2021 and voluntary 20% reduction of salary between April to June 2020
4. Appointed to the Board on 1 September 2021 and Chair from 1 December 2021
5.  Stepped down from the Board on 23 December 2020
6.  Stepped down from the Board on 21 December 2020
7.  Appointed to the Board on 17 November 2020
8.  Appointed to the Board on 6 August 2020
9.  Appointed to the Board on 1 January 2020
10. Appointed SID on 5 August 2020
11.  There are no employees in easyJet plc, therefore, the Committee decided to use the average for all UK employees as the appropriate comparator group 
given, they comprise over 50% of total employees and therefore this is considered to be the most representative for comparison. There was no general 
salary increase for UK employees in January 2021

12. Chief Executive benefits include reimbursements for business-related travel expenses in respect of domestic car travel which were lower in 2021 than 

2020

13. UK employee benefits remained unchanged versus the prior year. The zero bonus outcome, both for the Chief Executive and for all employees, has 

resulted from easyJet’s missing its profit threshold in 2021 as a result of Covid-19

152 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Relative importance of spend on pay
The table below shows the total pay for all of easyJet’s employees compared to other key financial indicators.

Employee costs (£ million)
Ordinary dividend (£ million)
Average monthly number of employees
Revenue (£ million)
Headline (loss)/profit before tax (£ million)

Year ended 
30 September 2021

Year ended 
30 September 2020

623
–
12,389
1,458
(1,136)

862
–
14,566
3,009
(835)

Change %

(28)%
0%
(15)%
(52)%
(36)%

1.  Additional information on the number of employees, total revenue and profit has been provided for context. The majority of easyJet’s employees 

(around 90%) perform flight and ground operations, with the rest performing administrative and managerial roles. 

Chief Executive pay ratio 
The table below sets out the Chief Executive pay ratios as at 30 September 2021. The report will build up over time to show a rolling 
10-year period. The ratios compare the single total figure of remuneration of the Chief Executive with the equivalent figures for the lower 
quartile (P25), median (P50) and upper quartile (P75) employees. 

We have used the ‘Option A’ methodology which uses actual earnings for the Chief Executive Officer and UK employees over the 
financial year to provide the most accurate comparison. The total FTE remuneration paid during the year for each employee in each of 
the groups was then calculated, on the same basis as the information set out in the ‘single figure’ table for the Chief Executive on 
page 134. 

In calculating the figures, the following considerations were made: 

•  The single total figure of remuneration of our UK colleagues was calculated as at 30 September 2021 
•  No bonus will be paid or LTIPs vest in relation to the 2021 year
•  Earnings for those who are part time or joined during the year have been annualised on an FTE basis
•  This data then identified those employees at the 25th, 50th (median) and 75th percentile points.

Year

2020
2021
2021
2021

25th percentile  

75th percentile  

Method

pay ratio

Median pay ratio

Option A
Option A
Total pay and benefits
Salary

30:1
27:1
£29,981
£20,300

23:1
21:1
£38,992
£24,360

pay ratio

12:1
10:1
£78,134
£71,002

Unlike the total remuneration for the majority of employees, total remuneration for the Chief Executive is mostly dependent on business 
performance and share price movements over time. As a result, the ratios may fluctuate significantly from year to year. 

The Committee has agreed that the ratio reflects easyJet’s wider policies on pay and reward in line with market, experience, and skills.

Statement of shareholders’ voting at AGM
The table below provides details of shareholder voting in respect of the Directors’ remuneration policy (approved in December 2020), 
and the Annual Report on Remuneration (in December 2020).

Votes cast in favour
Votes cast against
Total votes cast in favour or against
Votes withheld

Policy 
(December 2020 AGM)

Annual Report on Remuneration 
(December 2020 AGM)

170,640,512
7,497,351
178,137,863
131,196,347

95.79%
4.21%
100%
–

177,627,469
498,511
178,125,980
131,206,724

99.72%
0.28%
100%
–

Advisers to the Remuneration Committee
Deloitte was appointed as the new independent adviser, with effect from 21 January 2021 following an independent review process. 
Deloitte advises the Committee on developments in executive pay and on the operation of easyJet’s incentive plans. Other than to the 
Committee, advice is also provided to easyJet in relation to, for example, senior management pay practices and the fees of the Non-
Executive Directors. Total fees (excluding VAT) paid to Deloitte and Willis Towers Watson, the previous advisers, in respect of services to 
the Committee during the 2021 financial year were £72,950 and £31,200 respectively, based on time and materials. Deloitte is a founding 
member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and a signatory to its Code of Conduct. Any advice received is governed by that code. 
The Committee is satisfied that the Deloitte engagement team, which provide remuneration advice to the Committee, do not have 
connections with easyJet plc or its Directors that may impair their independence. The Committee has reviewed the operating processes 
in place at Deloitte and is satisfied that the advice it receives is independent and objective.

www.easyJet.com

153

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REPORT

DIRECTORS’ REPORT

It is the current intention that at the 
Company’s next AGM all continuing 
Executive and Non-Executive Directors will 
retire and offer themselves for 
reappointment in compliance with the 
2018 Code.

Directors’ conflicts of interest
Directors have a statutory duty to avoid 
situations in which they have, or may have, 
interests that conflict with those of easyJet, 
unless that conflict is first authorised by the 
Board. The Company has in place 
procedures for managing conflicts of 
interest. The Company’s Articles of 
Association also contain provisions to allow 
the Directors to authorise potential 
conflicts of interest so that a Director is not 
in breach of his or her duty under company 
law. Should a Director become aware that 
he or she has an interest, directly or 
indirectly, in an existing or proposed 
transaction with easyJet, he or she should 
notify the Board in line with the Company’s 
Articles of Association. Directors have a 
continuing duty to update any changes to 
their conflicts of interest. 

Directors’ indemnities
Directors’ and officers’ insurance cover has 
been established for all Directors to provide 
appropriate cover for their reasonable 
actions on behalf of the Company. A deed 
was executed in 2007 indemnifying each 
of the Directors of the Company and/or its 
subsidiaries as a supplement to the 
directors’ and officers’ insurance cover. 
The indemnities, which constitute a 
qualifying third-party indemnity provision as 
defined by section 234 of the Companies 
Act 2006, were in force during the 2021 
financial year and remain in force for all 
current and past Directors of the Company.

Employees
Employees with a disability 
The Company’s approach to providing 
support to disabled applicants and 
employees is detailed in our Diversity and 
Inclusion Strategy on page 56.

Communication and engagement
Details on how the Board and management 
have communicated and engaged with 
employees and the wider workforce while 
taking into account their interests in 
decision-making during the year can be 
found in the Stakeholder engagement 
section on pages 27 to 28 and 
Sustainability section on pages 43 of the 
Strategic Report and the Corporate 
Governance Report on pages 107 to 109.

Participation in share schemes
A key component of easyJet’s reward 
philosophy is to provide share ownership 
opportunities throughout the Group by 
making annual awards of performance-
related shares to all eligible employees 
when certain criteria are met. In addition, 
easyJet operates a voluntary discounted 
share purchase arrangement for all 
employees via a Save As You Earn scheme, 
and a Buy As You Earn arrangement with 
Matching Shares in the UK under the 
tax-approved Share Incentive Plan. In 
response to the Covid-19 pandemic 
Matching Shares were suspended from 
April 2020. Further details of the 
Company’s share schemes are set out in 
the Directors’ Remuneration Report on 
page 150.

Stakeholders
Details on the methods the Board has used 
to engage and build strong business 
relationships with the Group’s suppliers, 
customers and other key stakeholders are 
given on pages 26 to 37 of the Strategic 
Report and the Corporate Governance 
Report on pages 106 to 109. The Section 
172 Statement is available on page 36 of 
the Strategic Report.

The Directors present their Annual Report 
and Accounts together with the audited 
consolidated financial statements for  
the year ended 30 September 2021. 
This Directors’ Report and the Strategic 
Report, which includes the trends and 
factors likely to affect the future 
development, performance and position  
of the business and a description of the 
principal risks and uncertainties of the 
Group (which can be found on pages 78 to 
95 and are incorporated by reference), 
collectively comprise the management 
report as required under the Disclosure 
Guidance and Transparency Rules (‘DTRs’).

Results and dividend
The loss for the financial year after taxation 
amounts to £858 million (last year: loss of 
£1,079 million). 

As a result of the impact of the Covid-19 
pandemic on the Group, and the losses 
incurred, the Board is not recommending 
the payment of a dividend in respect of 
the year ended 30 September 2021. 
The Board recognises the importance of 
dividends to shareholders and will seek to 
resume payments when the operating 
environment and the financial performance 
of the Group permits. The Board expects 
to update shareholders as to when it 
anticipates resuming paying dividends and 
on its future dividend policy, assuming the 
market environment and circumstances 
permit, when it announces its full year 
results for the financial year ending 
30 September 2022. 

Board
Board of Directors and their 
interests
Details of the Directors who held office at 
the end of the year and their biographical 
details are set out on pages 98 to 101.
Changes to the Board during the year and 
up to the date of this report are set out on 
page 113. The Directors’ interest in the 
ordinary shares and options of the 
Company are disclosed within the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report on pages 130 to 153. 

Appointment and retirement of 
Directors 
The Directors may from time to time 
appoint one or more Directors. Any such 
Director shall hold office only until the next 
Annual General Meeting (AGM) and shall 
then be subject to appointment by the 
Company’s shareholders.

154 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

Shares
Share capital and rights attaching 
to shares
The Company’s issued share capital as at 
30 September 2021 comprised a single 
class of ordinary shares. Further details of 
the Company’s share capital during the 
year are disclosed in note 20 to the 
consolidated financial statements. 

All of the issued ordinary shares are fully 
paid and rank equally in all respects. 
The rights and obligations attaching to the 
Company’s ordinary shares are set out in its 
Articles of Association. Holders of ordinary 
shares are entitled, subject to any 
applicable law and the Company’s Articles 
of Association, to: 

•  have shareholder documents made 

available to them, including notice of any 
general meeting;

•  attend, speak and exercise voting rights 
at general meetings, either in person or 
by proxy; and

•  participate in any distribution of income 

or capital.

Directors’ powers in relation to 
issuing or buying back shares
Subject to applicable law and the 
Company’s Articles of Association the 
Directors may exercise all powers of the 
Company, including the power to authorise 
the issue and/or market purchase of the 
Company’s shares (subject to an 
appropriate authority being given to the 
Directors by shareholders in a general 
meeting and any conditions attaching to 
such authority). 

At the AGM held on 23 December 2020, 
the Directors were given the following 
authority:

•  to allot shares up to a nominal amount 

of £41,127,035, representing 
approximately one-third of the 
Company’s then issued share capital;

•  to allot shares comprising equity 

securities up to a further aggregate 
nominal amount of £41,127,035 in 
connection with an offer by way of a 
rights issue, representing approximately 
one-third of the Company’s then issued 
share capital;

•  to allot shares, without first offering 
them to existing shareholders in 
proportion to their holdings, up to a 
maximum nominal value of £6,231,368 
representing approximately 5% of the 
Company’s then issued share capital; and
•  to purchase in the market a maximum of 

45,674,962 shares representing 
approximately 10% of the Company’s 
then share capital.

As part of a review of its capital structure, 
the Board concluded that raising additional 
equity would protect and strengthen 
easyJet’s long term positioning in the 
European aviation sector. As a result, the 
Company launched a fully underwritten 
rights issue on 9 September 2021 to raise 
net proceeds of approximately £1.2 billion 
using the authorities outlined above. This 
comprised offering 31 New Shares to 
qualifying shareholders for every 47 Existing 
Shares held. The allotment of 301,260,394 
New Shares (representing approximately 
66% of the Company’s existing issued share 
capital) was effective on 27 September 
2021 and the Company’s issued share 
capital was increased to 758,010,025 
ordinary shares as of that date.

No other shares were allotted or bought 
back under the above authorities during 
the year and up to the date of this report. 
The standard authorities expire on 31 March 
2022 or at the conclusion of the 2022 
AGM, whichever is earlier. The Directors will 
seek to renew the authorities at the next 
AGM as a matter of routine.

Voting rights and restrictions on 
transfer of shares
None of the ordinary shares carry any 
special rights with regard to control of the 
Company. There are no restrictions on 
transfers of shares other than: 

•  certain restrictions which may from time 

to time be imposed by laws or 
regulations such as those relating to 
insider dealing;

•  pursuant to the Company’s Share 

Dealing Code, whereby the Directors and 
designated employees require approval 
to deal in the Company’s shares;

•  where a person with an interest in the 

Company’s shares has been served with 
a disclosure notice and has failed to 
provide the Company with information 
concerning interests in those shares;
•  where a proposed transferee of the 

Company’s shares has failed to provide 
to the Directors a declaration of 
nationality (together with such evidence 
as the Directors may require) as required 
by the Company’s Articles of Association; 
and

•  the powers given to the Directors by the 
Company’s Articles of Association to limit 
the ownership of the Company’s shares 
by non-UK nationals or, following a 
decision of the Directors, by non-EU 
nationals, and powers to enforce this 
limitation, including the right to force a 
sale of any affected shares.

There are no restrictions on exercising 
voting rights save in situations where the 
Company is legally entitled to impose such 
a restriction (for example under the Articles 
of Association where an Affected Share 
Notice has been served, amounts remain 
unpaid in the shares after request, or the 
holder is otherwise in default of an 
obligation to the Company). Those 
shareholders who own shares whose voting 
rights will be suspended at the AGM will 
receive an Affected Share Notice by post 
from Equiniti, our Registrars, on or around 
14 January 2022 notifying them of the 
suspension of voting rights in respect of 
their Affected Shares. Shareholders in 
receipt of an Affected Share Notice will not 
be entitled to attend, speak or vote at the 
AGM, in respect of those shares subject to 
an Affected Share Notice. The Company is 
not aware of any other arrangements 
between shareholders that may result in 
restrictions on the transfer of securities or 
voting rights.

Variation of rights
Subject to the Companies Act 2006, rights 
attached to any class of shares may be 
varied with the consent in writing of the 
holders of three-quarters in nominal value 
of the issued shares of the class or with the 
sanction of a special resolution passed at a 
separate general meeting of such class.

Employee share schemes – rights 
of control
The trustees of the easyJet UK Share 
Incentive Plan, which is used to acquire and 
hold shares in the Company for participants 
in the UK Share Incentive Plan, does not 
seek to exercise voting rights on shares 
held other than on direction of the 
underlying beneficiaries. The trustees take 
no action in respect of ordinary shares for 
which they have received no direction to 
vote, or in respect of ordinary shares which 
are unallocated.

The trustee of the easyJet plc Employee 
Benefit Trust (‘the Trust’), which is used to 
acquire and hold shares in the Company 
for the benefit of employees, including in 
connection with the easyJet Long Term 
Incentive Plan, the International Share 
Incentive Plan and Save As You Earn plans, 
has the power to vote or not vote, at its 
absolute discretion, in respect of any 
shares in the Company held unallocated in 
the Trust. However, in accordance with 
good practice, the trustee adopts a policy 
of not voting in respect of such shares. 
Both the trustees of the easyJet UK Share 
Incentive Plan and the easyJet plc Employee 
Benefit Trust have a dividend waiver in 
place in respect of shares which are the 
beneficial property of each of the trusts. 

www.easyJet.com

155

GOVERNANCEDI RE CTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUE D)

Additional information
Substantial interests 
In accordance with DTR 5, as at 30 September 2021 the Company had been notified of the following disclosable interests in its issued 
ordinary shares:

The Haji-Ioannou family concert party shareholding, consisting of easyGroup Holdings Limited 
(holding vehicle for Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou and Clelia Haji-Ioannou) and Polys Haji-Ioannou 
(through his holding vehicle Polys Holdings Limited)
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc

Number of  
shares as  
notified to the 
Company

% of issued share 
capital as at 
30 September 
2021

115,737,821
49,382,199

15.27%
6.51% 

Between 30 September 2021 and 29 November 2021, the Company received a number of notifications under DTR 5 which are available 
at https://corporate.easyjet.com/investors/directors-and-substantial-interests/substantial-interests. As at 29 November 2021, the 
Company had been notified that the Goldman Sachs Group, Inc interest had changed to 11,637,661 shares representing 1.54% of voting 
rights, Societe Generale had a notifiable interest of 40,071,333 shares representing 5.28% of voting rights, and Bank of America 
Corporation had a notifiable interest of 50,448,298 shares, representing 6.66% of voting rights.

Annual General Meeting 
The Board currently intends to hold the 
AGM on 10 February 2022 at 11.00am, 
subject to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic 
and any UK Government guidance on social 
distancing, non-essential travel or public 
gatherings. The arrangements for the 
Company’s 2022 AGM and details of the 
resolutions to be proposed, together with 
explanatory notes, will be set out in the Notice 
of AGM to be published on the Company’s 
website. Guidance on whether physical 
attendance by shareholders will be possible 
will be determined nearer the time of the AGM. 

Articles of Association
The Company’s Articles of Association may 
only be amended by a special resolution at 
a general meeting of the shareholders. The 
Company’s Articles of Association were last 
amended at the AGM on 23 December 
2020. A copy of the Articles is available on 
the Company’s website: https://corporate.
easyjet.com/investors.

Branches
The Group, through various subsidiaries, 
has established branches in France, 
Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal and 
Spain, in which the business operates.

Financial instruments
Details of the Group’s use of financial 
instruments, together with information on 
our financial risk management objectives 
and policies, hedging policies and our 
exposure to financial risks, can be found 
in Notes 24 to 26 of the consolidated 
financial statements. 

Going concern and 
viability statement
The Company’s going concern and viability 
statement are detailed on pages 74 to 77 
of the Strategic Report.

Independent auditor and 
disclosure of information to the 
auditor
Each Director has taken all the steps that 
they ought to have taken as a Director in 
order to make themself aware of any 
relevant audit information and to establish 
that the Group’s auditor is aware of that 
information. So far as each Director is 
aware, there is no relevant audit 
information of which the Group’s auditor is 
unaware. A resolution to reappoint 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor of 
the Group will be put to shareholders at the 
forthcoming AGM.

Political donations 
and expenditure
easyJet works constructively with all levels 
of government across its network, 
regardless of political affiliation. easyJet 
believes in the rights of individuals to 
engage in the democratic process; 
however, it is easyJet’s policy not to make 
political donations. There were no political 
donations made or political expenditure 
incurred during the 2021 financial year.

Greenhouse gas emissions and 
energy consumption
Details of the Company’s greenhouse gas 
emissions (GHG), energy consumption, 
energy efficiency action and Streamlined 
Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) 
disclosures can be found on pages 46 
to 49 of the Strategic Report.

Significant agreements – change 
of control
The Company licenses the easyJet brand 
from easyGroup Limited. Further details are 
set out in note 28 to the financial 
statements.

The following significant agreements, which 
were in force at 30 November 2021, take 
effect, alter or terminate on a change of 
control of the Company. 

EMTN Programme and 
Eurobond issue
On 7 January 2016, the Group established 
a Euro Medium Term Note Programme 
(the ‘EMTN Programme’) which provides 
the Group with a standardised 
documentation platform to allow for senior 
unsecured debt issuance in the Eurobond 
markets. The maximum potential issuance 
under the EMTN Programme is £3 billion. 
The EMTN Programme was subsequently 
updated in March 2021 with the issue of 
further Eurobonds.

Under the EMTN Programme, the following 
notes (the ‘Notes’) have been issued by 
the Company:

•  February 2016: Eurobonds consisting of 
€500 million guaranteed Notes paying 
1.75% coupon and maturing in 
February 2023;

•  October 2016: Eurobonds consisting of 
€500 million guaranteed Notes paying 
1.125% coupon and maturing in 
October 2023;

•  June 2019: Eurobonds consisting of 

€500 million guaranteed Notes paying 
0.875% coupon and maturing in 
June 2025; and

•  March 2021: Eurobonds consisting of €1.2 
billion guaranteed Notes paying 1.875% 
interest and maturing in March 2028.

156 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

•  Pursuant to the final terms attaching to 
the Notes, the Company will be required 
to make an offer to redeem or purchase 
the notes at their principal amount plus 
interest up to the date of redemption or 
repurchase if there is a change of control 
of the Company which results in a 
downgrade of the credit rating of the 
Notes to a non-investment grade rating 
or withdrawal of the rating by both 
Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s.

Revolving Credit Facility 
The Group is party to a Revolving Credit 
Facility (RCF) which contains change of 
control provisions. The current RCF 
amounts to a $400 million commitment, 
supported by a consortium of five banks, 
and has a termination date of September 
2025 (unless extended). 

Covid Corporate Financing Facility 
On 6 April 2020 easyJet issued a £600 
million Commercial Paper through the 
Covid-19 Corporate Financing Facility 
(CCFF). This is an unsecured, short-term 
paper issued at a discount, of which £300 

million was repaid in March 2021 and the 
remaining £300 million was repaid in 
November 2021.

UK Export Finance Facilities 
Agreement 
On 7 January 2021, easyJet entered into a 
new five-year term loan facility of $1.87 
billion underwritten by a syndicate of banks 
and supported by a partial guarantee from 
UK Export Finance under their Export 
Development Guarantee Scheme. 

Other agreements
The Company does not have agreements 
with any Director or employee that would 
provide compensation for loss of office or 
employment resulting from a change of 
control on takeover, except that provisions 
of the Company’s share schemes and plans 
may cause options and awards granted to 
employees under such schemes and plans 
to vest on a takeover.

The Annual Report and Accounts have 
been drawn up and presented in 
accordance with UK company law and the 
liabilities of the Directors in connection with 

the report shall be subject to the limitations 
and restrictions provided by such law.

easyJet plc is incorporated as a public 
limited company and is registered in 
England under number 3959649. easyJet 
plc’s registered office is Hangar 89, London 
Luton Airport, Luton, Bedfordshire, 
LU2 9PF.

The Strategic Report (comprising pages 2 
to 95) and Directors’ Report (comprising 
pages 96 to 129 and 154 to 157) were 
approved by the Board and signed on its 
behalf by the Company Secretary. 

By order of the Board

Maaike de Bie
Company Secretary

London, 30 November 2021

Disclosures required under Listing Rule 9.8.4
The information to be included in the 2021 Annual Report and Accounts under LR 9.8.4, where applicable, can be located as set 
out below. 

Information 

Details of long term incentive schemes
Shareholder waiver of future dividends

Other information that is relevant to this report, and which is incorporated by reference, can be located as follows:

Information 

Membership of Board during 2021 financial year 
Directors’ service contracts 
Financial instruments and financial risk management 
Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and energy efficiency 
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) matters
Corporate governance report 
Future developments of the business of the Group 
Employee equality, diversity and inclusion 
Employee engagement
Stakeholder engagement 
Section 172 Statement
Hedge accounting policies 
Activities in relation to Research and Development
Post Balance Sheet Events

Page 

201-202
155

Page 

98-101
151
204-211
46-48
38-55, 58-61
96
8-23
56-57
28, 43, 63, 109
26-37
36
180-181
29, 45, 51-52, 79
212

www.easyJet.com

157

GOVERNANCEIn accordance with section 418 of the 
Companies Act 2006, each Director in 
office at the date the Directors’ Report is 
approved, confirms that:

•  so far as the Director is aware, there is 
no relevant audit information of which 
the Company’s auditor is unaware; and
•  he/she has taken all the steps that he/

she ought to have taken as a Director in 
order to make himself/herself aware of 
any relevant audit information and to 
establish that the Company’s auditor is 
aware of that information.

The Annual Report on pages 1 to 158 was 
approved by the Board of Directors and 
authorised for issue on 30 November 2021 
and signed on its behalf by:

JOHAN LUNDGREN
Chief Executive

KENTON JARVIS
Chief Financial Officer

DI RE CTORS’ REPORT (CONTINUE D)

Directors’ responsibilities and 
statements
The Directors are responsible for preparing 
the Annual Report, the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report and the accounts in 
accordance with applicable law and 
regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to 
prepare financial statements for each 
financial year. Under that law the Directors 
have prepared the group and the company 
financial statements in accordance with 
international accounting standards in 
conformity with the requirements of the 
Companies Act 2006. Additionally, the 
Financial Conduct Authority’s Disclosure 
Guidance and Transparency Rules require 
the Directors to prepare the group financial 
statements in accordance with international 
financial reporting standards adopted 
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 
as it applies in the European Union. Under 
company law, Directors must not approve 
the financial statements unless they are 
satisfied that they give a true and fair view 
of the state of affairs of the group and 
company and of the profit or loss of the 
group for that period.

In preparing these accounts, the Directors 
are required to:

•  select suitable accounting policies and 

then apply them consistently;

•  make judgements and accounting 
estimates that are reasonable and 
prudent;

•  for the Group accounts, which have 
been prepared in accordance with 
international accounting standards, state 
whether applicable International Financial 
Reporting Standards (IFRS) adopted 
pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 
1606/2002 as it applies in the European 
Union in conformity with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 
2006 have been followed, subject to any 
material departures disclosed and 
explained in the accounts;

•  the company financial statements, which 
have been prepared in accordance with 
international accounting standards, state 
whether conformity with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 
2006 have been followed, subject to any 
material departures disclosed and 
explained in the accounts;

The Directors are responsible for keeping 
adequate accounting records that are 
sufficient to show and explain the Group’s 
and the Company’s transactions and 
disclose with reasonable accuracy at any 
time the financial position of the Group and 
the Company. This enables them to ensure 
that the accounts and the Directors’ 
remuneration report comply with the 
Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the 
Group accounts, Article 4 of the IAS 
Regulation. They are also responsible for 
safeguarding the assets of the Group and 
the Company and hence for taking 
reasonable steps for the prevention and 
detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are responsible for the 
maintenance and integrity of, amongst 
other things, the financial and corporate 
governance information provided on the 
easyJet website (https://corporate.easyjet.
com). Legislation in the United Kingdom 
governing the preparation and 
dissemination of accounts may differ  
from legislation in other jurisdictions.

The Directors consider that the Annual 
Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, are 
fair, balanced and understandable and 
provide the information necessary for 
shareholders to assess the Group’s and the 
Company’s position and performance, 
business model and strategy.

Each of the Directors, whose names and 
functions are listed on pages 98 to 101, 
confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:

•  the Group accounts, which have been 

prepared in accordance with 
international accounting standards and 
International Financial Reporting 
Standards (IFRS) adopted pursuant to 
Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it 
applies in the European Union, and 
Company accounts which have been 
prepared in accordance with 
international accounting standards in 
conformity with the requirements of the 
Companies Act 2006, both give a true 
and fair view of the assets, liabilities, 
financial position and profit of the Group 
and Company;

•  the Strategic Report, included in the 

Annual Report, includes a fair review of 
the development and performance of 
the business and the position of the 
Group, together with a description of the 
principal risks and uncertainties that 
it faces.

158 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

I N D E P E N D E N T   A U D I T O R S ’   R E P O R T   T O   T H E   M E M B E R S   O F   E A S Y J E T   P L C    

Report on the audit of the financial statements 
Opinion 
In our opinion, easyJet plc’s Group financial statements and Company financial statements (the ‘‘financial statements’’): 

•  give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Company’s affairs as at 30 September 2021 and of the Group’s loss and 

the Group’s and Company’s cash flows for the year then ended; 

•  have been properly prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standards in conformity with the requirements of the 

Companies Act 2006; and 

•  have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. 

We have audited the financial statements, included within the Annual Report and Accounts 2021 (the ‘‘Annual Report’’), which comprise: 
Consolidated and Company statements of financial position as at 30 September 2021; Consolidated income statement and Consolidated 
statement of comprehensive income, the Consolidated and Company statements of changes in equity, and the Consolidated and 
Company statements of cash flows for the year then ended; and the notes to the financial statements, which include a description of the 
significant accounting policies. 

Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the Audit Committee. 

Separate opinion in relation to international financial reporting standards adopted pursuant to Regulation 
(EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European Union 
As explained in note 1 to the financial statements, the Group, in addition to applying international accounting standards in conformity with 
the requirements of the Companies Act 2006, has also applied international financial reporting standards adopted pursuant to Regulation 
(EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European Union. 

In our opinion, the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with international financial reporting standards 
adopted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European Union. 

Basis for opinion 
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (‘‘ISAs (UK)’’) and applicable law. Our responsibilities 
under ISAs (UK) are further described in the Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We 
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. 

Independence 
We remained independent of the Group in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial 
statements in the UK, which includes the FRC’s Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our 
other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. 

To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided. 

Other than those disclosed in note 3 to the Group financial statements and the Audit Committee Report, we have provided no non-audit 
services to the Company in the period under audit. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

159
159 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
I N D E P E N D E N T   A U D I T O R S ’   R E P O R T   T O   T H E   M E M B E R S   O F   E A S Y J E T   P L C   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

Our audit approach 
Context 
There were no significant changes to the Group’s operations during the year. However, travel restrictions remained in place for much 
of the period due to Covid-19 and this continued to put significant pressure on the Group’s financial performance, financial position 
and liquidity.  

There are a number of changes to our key audit matters this year as explained later in the report. This year we have also specifically 
set out our consideration of the impact of climate change on the audit which is further explained below. 

Climate change risk is expected to have a significant impact on the aviation industry. As explained in the Sustainability Report, the Group 
is clearly mindful of its impact on the environment and focussed on ways to reduce climate related impacts as they continue to work 
towards their Net Zero pathway to 2050.  

In planning and executing our audit we have considered the Group’s risk assessment process following their work with the Cambridge 
Centre for Risk Studies (described in the Sustainability Report above). This, together with discussions with our own sustainability 
specialists, provided us with a good understanding of the potential impact of climate change on the financial statements. We assessed 
that the key financial statement line items and estimates which are more likely to be materially impacted by climate risks are those 
associated with future cash flows, given the more notable impacts of climate change on the business are expected to arise in the 
medium to long term. These include the impairment assessment of goodwill and landing rights, the assessment of impairment of 
investments held by easyJet plc as a standalone Company and the recoverability of the Group’s deferred tax assets; our key audit 
matters further explain how we have evaluated the impact of climate change. We have also specifically considered the impact of climate 
change on likely aircraft ownership periods, residual value changes for less fuel-efficient aircraft, and the related impact on ongoing 
depreciation charges. 

Whilst the Group is targeting net zero carbon emissions by 2050, they are continuing to work on their pathway towards this. The Group 
has started to quantify some of the impacts that may arise on this pathway; the future financial impacts are clearly uncertain given the 
medium to long term time horizon. We have discussed with management and the Audit Committee that the estimated financial impacts 
of climate change will need to be frequently reassessed and our expectation that climate change disclosures will continue to evolve as 
greater understanding of the actual and potential impacts on the Group’s future operations are obtained. 

Overview 

Audit scope 

•  We performed full scope audit procedures over the Company and one individually significant component in the Group. Procedures 

over material financial statements lines were performed in four further components. 
•  Separate audit procedures were performed in relation to consolidation adjustments. 
•  This provided coverage of 97% of external consolidated revenue and 98% of the consolidated loss before tax. 

Key audit matters 

•  Going concern (Group and Company) 
•  Leased aircraft maintenance provision (Group) 
•  Assessment of impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets (Group) 
•  Estimates in assessing the carrying value of owned aircraft assets (Group) 
•  Recoverability of deferred tax assets (Group) 
•  Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic (Group and Company) 

Materiality 

•  Overall Group materiality: £21,500,000 (2020: £21,500,000) based on 5% of headline loss before tax, capped at £21.5 million. 
•  Overall Company materiality: £19,350,000 (2020: £19,350,000) based on 1% of total assets, capped at 90% of Group materiality. 
•  Performance materiality: £16,125,000 (Group) and £14,500,000 (Company). 

The scope of our audit 
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. In 
particular, we looked at where the directors made subjective judgements, for example in respect of significant accounting estimates that 
involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain. 

Key audit matters 
Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors’ professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial 
statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) 
identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the 
audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and any comments we make on the results of our procedures 
thereon, were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we 
do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. 

This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit. 

Going concern, Estimates in assessing the carrying value of owned aircraft assets and Recoverability of deferred tax assets are new key 
audit matters this year. Discontinuation of hedge accounting, Valuation of restructuring provisions and Risk of fraud arising from cyber-
attack, which were key audit matters last year, are no longer included because of the risks associated with these matters having either 
significantly reduced in the current year or they relate specifically to events which arose in the prior year and have not reoccurred. 
Otherwise, the key audit matters below are consistent with last year. 

160 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
160  easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
Key audit matter 
Going concern (Group and Company) 
In the 2020 Annual Report and Accounts the occurrence 
of multiple downside potential risks, including cash 
collateralisation of unearned revenue by card acquirers 
and easyJet’s ability to obtain additional funding resulted 
in the conclusion that there was a material uncertainty 
that could cast significant doubt upon the Group’s ability 
to continue as a going concern. 

In forming its assessment for the 2021 Annual Report and 
Accounts the Board has concluded that the financial 
statements should be prepared on a going concern basis 
with the removal of the material uncertainty disclosure. In 
assisting the Directors reach their conclusion management 
has modelled both a base case and a downside case 
which it considers to be severe but plausible to assess 
whether there is sufficient access to liquidity across the 
going concern outlook period based on the financing 
facilities currently in place. 

We have focussed on this area given the continuing 
uncertainty in respect of the short term recovery of the 
airline industry and in light of the conclusions reached in 
the previous year. 

Refer to the Accounting policies, judgements and 
estimates note (note 1) and the going concern 
statement on page 75, for management’s disclosures 
of the relevant judgements and estimates involved in 
assessing going concern. 

How our audit addressed the key audit matter 

  •  We obtained management’s base case and severe but plausible downside 

scenario models supporting the Board’s going concern assessment, 
evaluated the process by which the assessment has been drawn up, 
ensured that the calculations in the models were mathematically 
accurate and that the overall methodology used was appropriate. 

•  We have evaluated the committed financing facilities currently available 
to the Group and ensured that both models appropriately include all 
contractual debt repayments and committed capital expenditure. 
•  We have reviewed the revised contracts which are now in place with 
some card acquirers and assessed whether any minimum liquidity 
requirements have appropriately been taken account of in management’s 
assessment on both the base case and downside scenarios. 

•  We have evaluated management’s base case and ensured that the 
forecasts being used were aligned with the Board approved plan. In 
evaluating the inputs used in managements base case scenario we 
challenged the key assumptions including: 

•  assessment of short-term recovery assumptions in the forecasts by 
comparing them to third party economic and industry forecasts;  
•  the level of assumed cost reductions delivered during the current year 
which have been assessed as sustainable through the going concern 
outlook period; and 

•  removing the impacts of any uncommitted re-financing in our overall 

evaluation. 

•  We have assessed whether the downside scenario applied is sufficiently 
severe in order to appropriately stress test the base case model. This 
considered both historical performance, current levels of forward bookings 
as well as the current status of travel restrictions in place across Europe 
and the vaccination roll out. 

•  We have also performed an alternative independent assessment 

considering the levels of operational cash utilisation which has been 
evidenced during the last year to evaluate the impact on overall liquidity 
headroom should a repeat scenario arise. 

•  We have reviewed the adequacy of disclosures made in the 2021 Annual 

Report and Accounts. 

Based on the work performed, as summarised above, we concur with the 
Board’s conclusion to adopt the going concern basis of preparation and that 
the removal of the previously disclosed material uncertainty is appropriate. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

161
161 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
   
 
 
 
I N D E P E N D E N T   A U D I T O R S ’   R E P O R T   T O   T H E   M E M B E R S   O F   E A S Y J E T   P L C   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

  •  We evaluated the maintenance provision model and tested the 

calculations therein. This included assessing the process by which 
the variable factors within the provision are estimated, evaluating 
the reasonableness of the assumptions, testing the input data and  
re-performing calculations. In particular, we challenged the key 
assumptions using the Group’s internal data, such as maintenance 
contract terms and pricing, business plans and forecasts. We also 
performed sensitivity analysis in respect of the key drivers of the 
model. We found no material exceptions from these assessments 
and comparisons.  

•  Having ascertained the magnitude of movements in those key 

assumptions, that either individually or collectively would be required 
for the provision to be misstated, we considered the likelihood of such 
movements arising and any impact on the overall level of aircraft 
maintenance provisions recorded in the financial statements. Our 
assessment as to likelihood and magnitude of misstatement did not 
identify any material exceptions.  

Based on the work performed, as summarised above, we have concluded 
the Group’s valuation of maintenance provisions on leased aircraft is 
materially appropriate. 

Key audit matter 
Leased aircraft maintenance provision (Group)     
The Group operates aircraft which are held under lease 
arrangements and for which it incurs liabilities for 
maintenance costs during the term of the lease. These 
arise from legal and contractual obligations relating to the 
condition of the aircraft when they are returned to the 
lessor. Maintenance provisions of £550 million  
(2020: £597 million) for aircraft maintenance costs in 
respect of leased aircraft were recorded in the financial 
statements at 30 September 2021. At each statement of 
financial position date, the calculation of the maintenance 
provision includes a number of variable factors and 
assumptions including primarily the expected cost of the 
heavy maintenance check at the time it is expected to 
occur.  

We focused on this area because of the inherent level of 
management judgement required in calculating the 
amount of provision needed as a result of the complex 
and subjective elements around these variable factors 
and assumptions. 

Refer to the Accounting policies, judgements and 
estimates note (note 1 and note 18), for management’s 
disclosures of the relevant judgements and estimates 
involved in assessing this provision valuation. Refer to the 
Audit Committee report on page 127 for a description of 
its assessment of significant judgements. 

162 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
162 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
Key audit matter 
Assessment of impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets (Group) 
At 30 September 2021, the aggregate value of goodwill 
and landing rights, which are both assessed to have 
indefinite lives, amounted to £533 million (2020: £533 
million). Under IAS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’, goodwill 
must be tested for impairment at least annually. 

How our audit addressed the key audit matter 

All goodwill, landing rights and aircraft and spares belong 
to a single cash-generating unit (‘‘CGU’’), being easyJet’s 
route network, and a single value in use (‘‘VIU’’) calculation 
is performed in order to assess their recoverability. 

We focused on the risk of impairment as the 
impairment test involves a number of subjective 
judgements and estimates by management, many of 
which are forward-looking. These estimates include key 
assumptions underpinning the strategic plan, fuel prices, 
exchange rates, long-term economic growth rates and 
discount rates. 

Refer to the Accounting policies, judgements and 
estimates note (note 1) and note 10, for management’s 
disclosures of the relevant judgements and estimates 
involved in assessing goodwill and landing rights for 
impairment. Refer to the Audit Committee report on page 
127 for a description of its assessment of significant 
judgements. 

  •  We obtained management’s annual impairment assessment and ensured 
the calculations were mathematically accurate and that the methodology 
used was in line with the requirements of IAS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’. 
•  We evaluated the future cash flow forecasts of the CGU, and the process 
by which the forecasts were drawn up. In doing this, we confirmed that 
the forecasts used for the impairment assessment were consistent with 
the latest Board-approved plans (excluding the impact of easyJet 
Holidays which is a separate CGU to which no goodwill is assigned).  
•  We evaluated the inputs in the VIU calculation and challenged the key 

assumptions including: 
•  assessment of short-term flying assumptions and long-term growth rates 

in the forecasts by comparing them to third party economic and 
industry forecasts;  

•  using our internal valuation experts to calculate an independent WACC 
rate range, with reference to comparable businesses, to assess the 
appropriateness of the WACC rate used in management’s assessment; 
•  assessment of the fuel price assumptions, to which the VIU model is most 
sensitive, to ensure the rates used at 30 September 2021 were appropriate 
and that sufficient disclosure of the underlying assumptions for dealing with 
future potential fuel price volatility via pass through to customers have been 
adequately disclosed in the financial statements; and 

•  working closely with internal sustainability specialists we evaluated the 

extent to which the considerations of climate change, such as expanded or 
more costly carbon trading schemes and the expected increased use of 
sustainable aviation fuels, had been reflected in the underlying cash flows. 
This included an assessment of the consistency of the assumptions used 
with the impact assessments that had already been carried out by easyJet’s 
sustainability team. 

•  We recalculated management’s own sensitivity analysis of key 

assumptions used in the VIU assessment and also performed our own 
independent sensitivity testing to include the application of reasonable 
alternative individual and combined risk scenarios in order to assess for 
any potential material impairment under such conditions. This included 
the consideration of potential future costs which could arise as a result 
of climate change, including from increased pricing or taxes from the 
emission of carbon and the use of more expensive sustainable 
aviation fuel. 

•  We reviewed the adequacy of disclosures made in the financial 

statements and assessed compliance with IAS 36 including challenging 
management to be transparent about the underlying risks which have 
been assessed and embedded into its future cash flow assumptions. 

Based on our work summarised above, we have concluded that goodwill 
and other intangible assets balances are not impaired at 30 September 2021 
and that appropriate assumption and sensitivity disclosures have been made 
in the financial statements. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

163
163 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
I N D E P E N D E N T   A U D I T O R S ’   R E P O R T   T O   T H E   M E M B E R S   O F   E A S Y J E T   P L C   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Key audit matter 
Estimates in assessing the carrying value of owned aircraft assets (Group) 
At 30 September 2021, the aggregate value of owned 
aircraft amounted to £3,497 million (2020: £4,246 million). 
The recoverable amount of these assets is supported as 
part of the VIU assessment described in the key audit 
matter above. The carrying value of these assets and the 
resulting depreciation charge recognised in the income 
statement is dependent on the estimated useful 
economic lives (‘‘UELs’’) and residual values used.  

  •  We assessed whether managements estimated UEL estimates were in line 
with the requirements of IAS 16 and current fleet planning assumptions. 
•  We evaluated the methodology being used by management to estimate 

the residual value of these assets including their use of a third party 
valuation expert in determining the residual value associated with the 
specific assets capitalised at the purchase date. We also carried out 
procedures and enquiries to validate the third party valuation expert 
used by management was appropriately qualified.  

Whilst these estimates are required to be assessed 
annually more focus has been placed on them in the 
light of the more volatile aircraft valuations being seen 
in the market and identified changes to intended 
holding periods. 

Refer to the Accounting policies, judgements and 
estimates note (note 1) and note 11, for management’s 
disclosures of the relevant judgements and estimates 
involved in assessing UELs and residual values. Refer to the 
Audit Committee report on page 127 for a description of 
its assessment of significant judgements. 

•  We challenged management to support the assumptions used in respect 

of estimating the UEL and residual value of maintenance event 
enhancements which are capitalised over the life of the aircraft. 

•  We have also specifically considered the impact of climate change on 
likely aircraft ownership periods and residual value changes impacting 
less fuel-efficient aircraft. 

•  We assessed that the date from which these changes in estimates 
would be applied prospectively has been applied appropriately. 

•  We obtained management’s calculation for the resulting impact on the 
depreciation charge from updating these estimates and ensured the 
calculations were mathematically accurate and that the correct final 
assumptions had been used to determine the overall depreciation 
charge in the year. 

•  We have reviewed the adequacy of disclosures made in the financial 

statements. 

Based on our work summarised above, we have concluded that the 
estimates used to determine the current carrying value of owned aircraft 
assets and the related depreciation charge in the year were appropriate. 
The date of the application of the prospective change was considered 
appropriate and appropriate disclosures have been made in the financial 
statements. 

Recoverability of deferred tax assets (Group) 
At 30 September 2021 significant deferred tax assets 
(‘‘DTAs’’) of £425 million (Sep 20: £275 million) have been 
recognised, primarily in respect of aggregated  
UK tax losses.  

  •  We obtained management’s calculation for assessing the recognition and 
recoverability of deferred tax assets and assessed the methodology and 
ability to offset and recognise certain DTAs against the unwind of existing 
deferred tax liabilities, primarily in respect of UK fixed assets. 

We have focussed on this area given the significant 
judgement required in assessing whether full recognition 
and recoverability of the asset is appropriate. When 
considering the additional losses reported in the current 
year alongside the existence of the significant losses 
brought forward there is an increased time horizon 
associated with the future recovery of the DTAs and as a 
result an increased level of uncertainty. Combined with the 
continuing uncertainty arising from Covid-19 and climate 
change on future forecasts this acts to increase the 
overall level of judgement in making this assessment. 

Refer to the Accounting policies, judgements and 
estimates note (note 1) and note 6, for management’s 
disclosures of the relevant judgements and estimates 
involved in assessing the recoverability of DTAs. Refer to 
the Audit Committee report on page 127 for a description 
of its assessment of significant judgements. 

•  We have assessed the future profit forecasts which have been used to 
support the additional recognition and recovery of DTAs. This included 
assessment of whether the pre-tax cashflows had been appropriately 
adjusted for tax purposes to estimate the taxable profit/loss in each year. 
We also assessed the risk adjustments which have been applied to these 
future profits given the extended expected recovery time horizon to 
evaluate whether the methodology applied was in line with the 
requirements of IAS 12 and the associated guidance from the European 
Securities and Markets Authority.  

•  We assessed the consistency of the forecasts used to justify the 

recognition of DTAs to those used elsewhere in the business such as in 
the assessment of goodwill and landing rights recoverability and the 
Directors’ viability and going concern statements. Further assessment was 
made of the forecasts for periods which extended beyond the period 
which had already been assessed as part of our audit work in these 
other areas to ensure the assumptions used appeared reasonable.  

•  In assessing the future forecasts across this extended time horizon, whilst 
recognising the inherent uncertainty in assessing the impacts which may 
arise, we challenged management as to whether allowance had been 
made for the potential impact of climate change to reflect the current 
risks which have been identified. Where appropriate, we also considered 
this when assessing management’s sensitivity analysis and when 
performing our own independent sensitivity testing. 

•  We reviewed the adequacy of disclosures made in the financial 

statements in respect of this judgemental estimate including challenging 
management to be transparent about the underlying risks which have 
been assessed and embedded into its future cash flow assumptions. 

Based on our work summarised above, we have concluded that the full 
recognition of the DTAs at 30 September 2021 is appropriate and that 
appropriate disclosure of the judgements applied has been included within 
the financial statements. 

164 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
164 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
Key audit matter 
Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic (Group and Company) 
Throughout the year the Group and Company have 
continued to operate and trade in an environment that 
has seen significantly reduced levels of flying when 
compared to historical levels. Management has considered 
the impact of Covid-19 on the Group and Company 
financial statements. Primarily these considerations related 
to the possible impairment of intangible and tangible 
assets, the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the 
recognition of income from furlough and temporary 
government unemployment support schemes, the 
appropriate accounting for sale and leaseback 
transactions and the Board’s going concern assessment.  

There is a risk that the financial impact arising from  
Covid-19 which has been recorded by management is 
inappropriate or that we are unable to obtain sufficient 
audit evidence to support our conclusions in respect of 
this assessment. Our audit focused on those areas where 
management identified potential financial impacts arising 
as a result of the pandemic which, based on our 
independent risk assessment, could give rise to a risk of 
material misstatement. 

Refer to Accounting Policies note (notes 1a and 1b), note 
5, note 18 and note 27 as well as the Directors’ Report and 
Strategic Report for management’s disclosures of the 
relevant judgements, estimates and impacts related to 
these items. 

How our audit addressed the key audit matter 

  In advance of the year end and throughout the course of the audit we 

continued to assess the risks arising from the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. 
We focussed on areas where significant additional audit effort might be 
required as well as those areas which might be susceptible to a material 
financial impact on the performance and position of the Group or Company 
for the year ended 30 September 2021. Other than as already described in 
the key audit matters above, we noted the following key material impacts on 
the financial statements, arising from Covid-19:  

•  We verified furlough receipts have been received through inspection of 
bank statements and correspondence. We also performed additional 
enquires to confirm no issues have arisen regarding the eligibility of claims 
or any evidence that is indicative of errors which could otherwise result in 
potentially material refunds, fines and penalties. 

•  We assessed the movements and closing positions in respect of the 

specific restructuring and customer welfare provisions established as a 
result of the pandemic. 

•  We evaluated the accuracy of the hedge de-designation impacts 

recognised in the income statement based on the use of appropriate 
forecast cash flows and the assessment of whether the specific 
transactions related to headline or non-headline items.  

•  We challenged management in respect of the fair valuation of the 

consideration received and lease liabilities recognised in respect of aircraft 
which were subject to sale and leaseback transactions and we 
corroborated this assessment back to third party valuations and other 
supporting evidence. We concluded that the accounting treatment for 
these items was appropriate. 

•  We have sample tested the authenticity of credit vouchers issued to 

customers, that primarily arose from the cancellation of flights across both 
the current and prior year, agreeing the voucher amounts to evidence 
that the initial cash received was from the same customer. 

•  We evaluated management’s impairment assessment of the investment 
held by the Company in easyJet Airline Company Limited. We concluded 
the investment was not impaired following assessment of the underlying 
cash flows and VIU calculation which are predominantly the same as 
those evaluated as described in the ‘Assessment of impairment of 
goodwill and other intangible assets’ key audit matter. 

•  Despite undertaking some of our year end work remotely, we did not 

encounter any significant difficulties in performing our audit testing or in 
obtaining the required evidence to support our audit conclusions.  

•  We reviewed the disclosures in the financial statements in respect of the 
continuing impact of Covid-19 and concluded that these are appropriate.  

Based on the work performed, as summarised above, we have 
concluded that the Group’s conclusions in respect of the impact of  
Covid-19 are appropriate. 

How we tailored the audit scope 
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements 
as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group and the Company, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in 
which they operate. 

The Group operates through the Company and its fourteen subsidiary undertakings of which eight were actively trading through the 
year. The remaining subsidiaries are either holding companies, dormant or have been newly established during the year and not yet 
started to actively trade. The accounting for these subsidiaries, each of which is considered to be a separate component in the way we 
scope our audit, is primarily centralised in the UK. 

We determined the most effective approach to scoping was to perform full scope audit procedures over the Company and one 
individually significant component in the Group which is registered in the UK. Procedures over material financial statements lines were 
performed in four further components. In some cases, financial statement line items are tested in aggregate to the Group materiality 
level where items across more than one component are homogenous. All Group audit work has been performed by the UK Group 
engagement team. 

Additional audit procedures were performed in relation to consolidation adjustments by the UK Group engagement team. The testing 
approach ensured that appropriate audit evidence was obtained over all financial statement line items in order to support our opinion on 
the Group financial statements as a whole. Based on the detailed audit work performed across the Group, we have obtained coverage of 
97% of external consolidated revenue and 98% of the loss before tax. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

165
165 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
I N D E P E N D E N T   A U D I T O R S ’   R E P O R T   T O   T H E   M E M B E R S   O F   E A S Y J E T   P L C   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

Materiality 
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, 
together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit 
procedures on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually 
and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole. 

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows: 

Overall materiality 
How we determined it    5% of headline loss before tax, capped at £21.5 million 

  Financial statements – group 
  £21,500,000 (2020: £21,500,000). 

Financial statements – company 
  £19,350,000 (2020: £19,350,000). 

  1% of total assets, capped at 90% of Group 

materiality 

Rationale for  
benchmark applied 

  We consider that the income statement remains the principal 
measure used by the shareholders in assessing the underlying 
performance of the Group and therefore an approach to materiality 
based on 5% of the headline loss before tax has been applied. 
However, given the context of this year’s headline loss before tax, we 
capped the level of overall materiality at £21.5 million. This is in line with 
the level used in 2020 when the same cap was applied, in line with the 
materiality level applied in 2019. 

  We believe that a total asset benchmark is 

appropriate given that the Company does not 
generate revenues of its own. The value is 
capped at 90% of the Group overall 
materiality. 

For each component in the scope of our Group audit, we allocated a materiality that is less than our overall Group materiality. The 
materiality allocated to the two significant components was £19,350,000. 

We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and 
undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance materiality in determining the scope of our audit 
and the nature and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures, for example in determining sample 
sizes. Our performance materiality was 75% of overall materiality, amounting to £16,125,000 for the Group financial statements and 
£14,500,000 for the Company financial statements. 

In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number of factors - the history of misstatements, risk assessment 
and aggregation risk and the effectiveness of controls - and concluded that an amount at the upper end of our normal range 
was appropriate. 

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £1,075,000 (Group 
audit) (2020: £1,075,000) and £1,075,000 (Company audit) (2020: £1,075,000) as well as misstatements below those amounts that, in 
our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons. 

Conclusions relating to going concern 
Our evaluation of the directors’ assessment of the Group's and the Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of 
accounting included: 

•  Review of management’s base case and severe but plausible downside scenario, ensuring the directors have considered all appropriate 
factors. This included consideration of the cash flows against current industry forecasts, the liquidity position of the Group, available 
financing facilities, the timing of contractual debt repayments and committed capital expenditure and the relevant liquidity 
requirements that exist as part of the contractual arrangements with current card acquirers. 

•  Consideration of the operational cash utilisation which has been evidenced during the last year to assess the potential impact on the 

overall liquidity headroom should a repeat scenario arise. 

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually 
or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group's and the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at 
least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue. 

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the 
preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. 

However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the Group's and the 
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. 

In relation to the directors’ reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or 
draw attention to in relation to the directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate 
to adopt the going concern basis of accounting. 

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections  
of this report. 

166 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
166 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
Reporting on other information 
The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors’ report 
thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information which includes reporting based on the Task Force on Climate-related 
Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, 
accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, any form of 
assurance thereon. 

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider 
whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or 
otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are required 
to perform procedures to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material misstatement of 
the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other 
information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report based on these responsibilities. 

With respect to the Strategic report and Directors’ Report, we also considered whether the disclosures required by the UK Companies 
Act 2006 have been included. 

Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the Companies Act 2006 requires us also to report certain opinions and 
matters as described below. 

Strategic report and Directors’ Report 
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit, the information given in the Strategic report and Directors’ 
Report for the year ended 30 September 2021 is consistent with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements. 

In light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and Company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit, we 
did not identify any material misstatements in the Strategic report and Directors’ Report. 

Directors’ Remuneration 
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the 
Companies Act 2006. 

Corporate governance statement 
The Listing Rules require us to review the directors’ statements in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the 
corporate governance statement relating to the Company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code 
specified for our review. Our additional responsibilities with respect to the corporate governance statement as other information are 
described in the Reporting on other information section of this report. 

Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance 
statement, included within the of the Annual Report and Accounts is materially consistent with the financial statements and our 
knowledge obtained during the audit, and we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to: 

•  The directors’ confirmation that they have carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks; 
•  The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe those principal risks, what procedures are in place to identify emerging risks and an 

explanation of how these are being managed or mitigated; 

•  The directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether they considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of 
accounting in preparing them, and their identification of any material uncertainties to the Group’s and Company’s ability to continue to 
do so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements; 

•  The directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the Group's and Company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and why 

the period is appropriate; and 

•  The directors’ statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and 

meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of its assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention to any 
necessary qualifications or assumptions. 

Our review of the directors’ statement regarding the longer-term viability of the Group was substantially less in scope than an audit and 
only consisted of making inquiries and considering the directors’ process supporting their statement; checking that the statement is in 
alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code; and considering whether the statement is consistent with 
the financial statements and our knowledge and understanding of the Group and Company and their environment obtained in the course 
of the audit. 

In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate 
governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit: 

•  The directors’ statement that they consider the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides 

the information necessary for the members to assess the Group’s and Company's position, performance, business model and strategy; 

•  The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems; and 
•  The section of the Annual Report describing the work of the Audit Committee. 

We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when the directors’ statement relating to the Company’s compliance 
with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the Code specified under the Listing Rules for review 
by the auditors. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

167
167 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
I N D E P E N D E N T   A U D I T O R S ’   R E P O R T   T O   T H E   M E M B E R S   O F   E A S Y J E T   P L C   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit 
Responsibilities of the directors for the financial statements 
As explained more fully in the Directors’ responsibilities and statements in the Directors’ Report, the directors are responsible for the 
preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair 
view. The directors are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial 
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. 

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Company’s ability to continue as a 
going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the 
directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so. 

Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements 
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material 
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high 
level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material 
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, 
they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements. 

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our 
responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our 
procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below. 

Based on our understanding of the Group and industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance with laws and regulations 
related to other environmental regulations, adherence to data protection requirements in the jurisdictions in which easyJet operates and 
holds data, UK and overseas tax legislation not being adhered to and non-compliance with employment regulations in the UK and other 
jurisdictions in which the Group operates, and we considered the extent to which non-compliance might have a material effect on the 
financial statements. We evaluated management’s incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements 
(including the risk of override of controls), and determined that the principal risks were related to inappropriate journal entries, either in 
the underlying books and records or as part of the consolidation process, and management bias in accounting estimates. Audit 
procedures performed by the engagement team included: 

•  Discussions with management, internal audit and the Group’s legal team, including consideration of known or suspected instances of 

non-compliance with laws and regulations and fraud 

•  Challenging assumptions and judgements made by management in it’s significant accounting estimates that involved making 

assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain. We focused on the valuation of the maintenance provision, 
the estimates used in assessing the carrying value of owned aircraft, the assessment of impairment of intangible assets and the 
recoverability of deferred tax assets (see related key audit matters above). We also specifically assessed the provisions held in respect 
of restructuring, actual and potential litigation matters, provisions held for customer compensation and for the Company the 
assessment of impairment of investments 

•  Consideration of recent correspondence with the Group’s legal advisors to ensure that it aligned with the conclusions drawn on 

obligations recognised and contingent liabilities disclosed in respect of uncertain legal matters 

•  Identifying and testing journal entries, in particular any journal entries posted with unusual account combinations or those posted by 

unexpected users 

•  Testing all material consolidation adjustments to ensure these were appropriate in nature and magnitude 

There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above. We are less likely to become aware of instances of non-
compliance with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and transactions reflected in the financial statements. Also, 
the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud 
may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion. 

Our audit testing might include testing complete populations of certain transactions and balances, possibly using data auditing 
techniques. However, it typically involves selecting a limited number of items for testing, rather than testing complete populations. We 
will often seek to target particular items for testing based on their size or risk characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit sampling to 
enable us to draw a conclusion about the population from which the sample is selected. 

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC’s website at: 
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors’ report. 

Use of this report 
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the Company’s members as a body in accordance with Chapter 3 
of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for 
any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed 
by our prior consent in writing. 

168 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
168 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
Other required reporting 
Companies Act 2006 exception reporting 
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion: 

•  we have not obtained all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or 
•  adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from 

branches not visited by us; or 

•  certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or 
•  the Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement with the 

accounting records and returns. 

We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility. 

Appointment 
Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the members on 22 February 2006 to audit the financial 
statements for the year ended 30 September 2006 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement is 
16 years, covering the years ended 30 September 2006 to 30 September 2021. 

Owen Mackney (Senior Statutory Auditor) 

for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors 
Watford 

1 December 2021 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

169
169 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
Consolidated income statement 

Year ended 30 September 2021
Total
£ million 
1,000 
458 
1,458 

Non-headline
£ million 
– 
– 
– 

Headline
£ million 
1,000 
458 
1,458 

Notes 

8 

Passenger revenue 
Ancillary revenue 

Total revenue 

Fuel 
Airports, ground handling and other 
operating costs 
Crew 
Navigation 
Maintenance 
Selling and marketing 
Other costs 
Other income 
EBITDAR 

Aircraft dry leasing 
Impairment 
Depreciation 
Amortisation of intangible assets 

Operating (loss)/profit 

Interest receivable and other financing income 
Interest payable and other financing charges 

Net finance charges 

(Loss)/profit before tax 

Tax credit/(charge) 

(Loss)/profit for the year 

Loss per share, pence 
Basic 
Diluted 

11 
10 

2 

3 

6 

7 
7 

Headline
£ million 
2,303 
706 
3,009 

(721) 

(938) 
(629) 
(206) 
(278) 
(107) 
(426) 
23 
(273) 

(1) 
– 
(485) 
(18) 
(777) 

12 
(70) 

(58) 

Non-headline 
£ million 

Year ended 30 September 2020 
Total
£ million 
2,303 
706 
3,009 

–   
–   
–   

– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
(130 )* 
45 * 
(85 ) 

– 
(37 ) 
–  
–  
(122 ) 

105  
(421 ) 

(721) 

(938) 
(629) 
(206) 
(278) 
(107) 
(556) 
68 
(358) 

(1) 
(37) 
(485) 
(18) 
(899) 

117 
(491) 

(316 ) 

(374) 

(371) 

(446) 
(495) 
(102) 
(222) 
(60) 
(319) 
6 
(551) 

(5) 
– 
(456) 
(24) 
(1,036) 

50 
(150) 

(100) 

– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
47 
79 
126 

– 
– 
– 
– 
126 

33 
(59) 

(26) 

(371) 

(446) 
(495) 
(102) 
(222) 
(60) 
(272) 
85 
(425) 

(5) 
– 
(456) 
(24) 
(910) 

83 
(209) 

(126) 

(1,136) 

100 

(1,036) 

(835) 

(438 ) 

(1,273) 

236 

(58) 

178 

110 

84  

194 

(900) 

42 

(858) 

(725) 

(354 ) 

(1,079) 

(159.0) 
(159.0) 

(222.9) 
(222.9) 

*  Sale and leaseback gains and losses recognised in the prior year have been re-presented, see note 5. 

170 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
170 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 

Loss for the year 
Other comprehensive income/(loss) 

Items that may be reclassified to the income statement: 
Cash flow hedges 
   Fair value gains/(losses) in the year 
   (Gains)/losses transferred to income statement 
   Hedge discontinuation losses transferred to income statement 
   Related tax (charge)/credit 
Cost of hedging 
   Related tax credit 

Items that will not be reclassified to the income statement: 
Remeasurement gain of post-employment benefit obligations  
   Related deferred tax credit 
Fair value loss on equity investment 

Total comprehensive loss for the year 

Year ended
30 September 
2021
£ million 
(858) 

Year ended
30 September 
2020
£ million 
(1,079) 

Notes 

6 

19 
6 

477 
(17) 
25 
(93) 
(3) 
1 

5 
(4) 
(3) 
388 
(470) 

(628) 
39 
284 
55 
(8) 
1 

3 
– 
(15) 
(269) 
(1,348) 

Fair valuation gains in the year primarily due to increases in the market price of jet fuel, along with movements in foreign exchange rates 
used when valuing derivatives held in the hedging reserve. 

For capital expenditure cash flow hedges, the accumulated gains and losses recognised in other comprehensive income will be 
transferred to the initial carrying amount of the asset acquired, within property, plant and equipment.  

Losses/(gains) on cash flow hedges reclassified from other comprehensive income in income statement captions are as follows: 

Revenue 
Fuel 
Maintenance 
Eurobonds 
Other costs 

2021
£ million 
(8) 
41 
– 
(49) 
(1) 
(17) 

2020
£ million 
(16) 
43 
(6) 
21 
(3) 
39 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

171
171 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated statement of financial position 

As at 30 
September 
2021 
£ million 

As at 30 
September 
2020
£ million 

Notes 

Non-current assets 
Goodwill 
Other intangible assets 
Property, plant and equipment 
Derivative financial instruments 
Equity investment 
Restricted cash 
Other non-current assets 
Deferred tax assets 

Current assets 
Trade and other receivables 
Intangible assets 
Derivative financial instruments 
Current tax assets 
Restricted cash 
Money market deposits 
Cash and cash equivalents 

Current liabilities 
Trade and other payables 
Unearned revenue 
Borrowings 
Lease liabilities 
Derivative financial instruments 
Current tax payable 
Provisions for liabilities and charges 

Net current assets/(liabilities) 

Non-current liabilities 
Borrowings 
Unearned revenue 
Lease liabilities  
Derivative financial instruments 
Non-current deferred income 
Post-employment benefit obligation 
Provisions for liabilities and charges 
Deferred tax  

Net assets 

Shareholders' equity 
Share capital 
Share premium 
Hedging reserve 
Cost of hedging reserve 
Translation reserve 
Retained earnings 

Total equity  

10 
10 
11 
24 
24 
14 
12 
6 

13 
10 
24 

14 
14 
14 

15 
15 
16 
17 
24 

18 

16 

17 
24 

19 
18 

20 

365 
217 
4,735 
86 
30 
1 
135 
39 
5,608 

291 
140 
185 
– 
13 
– 
3,536 
4,165 

(1,128) 
(844) 
(300) 
(189) 
(31) 
(2) 
(183) 
(2,677) 

365 
232 
5,053 
89 
33 
5 
133 
– 
5,910 

193 
12 
21 
7 
14 
32 
2,284 
2,563 

(1,242) 
(614) 
(987) 
(224) 
(352) 
– 
(407) 
(3,826) 

1,488 

(1,263) 

(3,067) 
(2) 
(890) 
(37) 
(4) 
(37) 
(420) 
– 
(4,457) 

(1,744) 
– 
(486) 
(85) 
(5) 
(45) 
(332) 
(51) 
(2,748) 

2,639 

1,899 

207 
2,166 
156 
(1) 
– 
111 
2,639 

125 
1,051 
(236) 
1 
(2) 
960 
1,899 

The financial statements on pages 170 to 212 were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 30 November 2021 
and signed on behalf of the Board. 

JOHAN LUNDGREN 
Director  

KENTON JARVIS 
Director

172 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
172 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated statement of changes in equity 

At 1 October 2020 
Loss for the period 
Other comprehensive income/(loss) 
Total comprehensive income/(loss) 
Net proceeds from rights issue (note 
20) 
Share incentive schemes 
   Value of employee services 
   Related tax (note 6) 
   Purchase of own shares 
Currency translation differences 

At 30 September 2021 

At 1 October 2019 
Loss for the period  
Other comprehensive loss 
Total comprehensive loss 
Transfer to property plant and 
equipment 
Dividends paid (note 9) 
Net proceeds from shares issued 
Share incentive schemes 
   Value of employee services 
   Related tax (note 6) 
   Purchase of own shares 
Currency translation differences 

At 30 September 2020 

Share 
Capital
£ million 
125 
– 
– 
– 

Share 
premium
£ million 
1,051 
– 
– 
– 

Hedging 
reserve
£ million 
(236) 
– 
392 
392 

Cost of 
hedging 
reserve
£ million 
1 
– 
(2) 
(2) 

Translation 
reserve 
£ million 
(2) 
– 
– 
– 

Retained 
earnings
£ million 
960 
(858) 
(2) 
(860) 

82 

– 

– 
– 
207 

Share 
Capital
£ million 
108 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
17 

– 
– 
– 
– 
125 

1,115 

– 

– 
– 
2,166 

Share 
premium
£ million 
659 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
392 

– 
– 
– 
– 
1,051 

– 

– 

– 
– 
156 

Hedging 
reserve
£ million 
(4) 
– 
(250) 
(250) 

18 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
(236) 

– 

– 

– 
– 
(1) 

– 

– 

– 
2 
– 

– 

15 
2 
(6) 
– 
111 

Cost of 
hedging 
reserve
£ million 
8 
– 
(7) 
(7) 

Translation 
reserve 
£ million 
(1) 
– 
– 
– 

Retained 
earnings
£ million 
2,215 
(1,079) 
(12) 
(1,091) 

– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
1 

– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
(1) 
(2) 

– 
(174) 
– 

18 
(1) 
(7) 
– 
960 

Total
£ million 
1,899 
(858) 
388 
(470) 

1,197 

15  
2 
(6) 
2 
2,639 

Total
£ million 
2,985 
(1,079) 
(269) 
(1,348) 

18 
(174) 
409 

18 
(1) 
(7) 
(1) 
1,899 

On 9 September 2021 the Company invited its shareholders to subscribe to a rights issue of 301,260,394 ordinary shares at an 
issue price of 410 pence per share on the basis of 31 shares for every 47 fully paid ordinary shares held, with such shares issued on  
28 September 2021.  

The rights issue resulted in £1,235 million of gross proceeds. Shares totalling 280.2 million were taken up by existing shareholders (93%) 
with the remaining rump of 21.0 million shares being underwritten. As at 30 September 2021, there were £91 million of proceeds 
outstanding, which have been subsequently received. Costs of £38 million were incurred on the rights issue. 

In June 2020, easyJet successfully raised net proceeds of £409 million through an equity placing of new shares. 

The hedging reserve comprises the effective portion of the cumulative net change in fair value of cash flow hedging instruments relating 
to highly probable transactions that are forecast to occur after the year end. Included within the hedging reserve are amounts totalling a 
£13 million gain related to derivative hedge trades that were mutually early terminated with counterparty banks in the year ended  
30 September 2020 (2020: £46 million gain), as these trades had an effective hedge relationship at the point of termination, the fixed 
fair value is held in the hedging reserve and recycled to the income statement in line with when the original hedge item also impacts the 
income statement. See section ‘Foreign currency risk management in note 25 for further details. 

At 30 September 2021 amounts in the hedging reserve comprised of £nil related to cross-currency basis (2020: £4 million gain) and a  
£1 million loss related to the time value of options (2020: £3 million loss). 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

173
173 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated statement of cash flows 

Cash flows from operating activities 
Cash used from operations 
Ordinary dividends paid 
Interest and other financing charges paid 
Interest and other financing income received 
Net tax received 

Net cash used in operating activities 

Cash flows from investing activities 
Purchase of property, plant and equipment 
Purchase of non-current intangible assets 
Net decrease in money market deposits 
Net proceeds from sale and leasebacks 

Net cash generated by investing activities 

Cash flows from financing activities 
Net proceeds from issue of ordinary shares 
Purchase of own shares for employee share schemes 
Proceeds from debt financing 
Repayment of bank loans and other borrowings 
Repayment of capital element of leases  
Decrease/(increase) in restricted cash 

Net cash generated from financing activities 

Effect of exchange rate changes 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 

Notes 

22 
9 

11 
10 
23 

23 
23 
23 
14 

Year ended 
30 September 
2021 
£ million 

Year ended
30 September 
2020
£ million 

(755) 
- 
(282) 
1 
1 
(1,035) 

(140) 
(9) 
32 
836 
719 

1,144 
(6) 
1,804 
(1,045) 
(261) 
5 
1,641 

(542) 
(174) 
(71) 
12 
13 
(762) 

(659) 
(36) 
259 
702 
266 

409 
(7) 
1,399 
– 
(230) 
(15) 
1,556 

(73) 

(61) 

1,252 

2,284 

999 

1,285 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 

14 

3,536 

2,284 

174 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
174 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS 

1. Accounting policies, judgements and estimates 

Statement of compliance 

easyJet plc (the ‘Company’) and its subsidiaries (‘easyJet’ or the ‘Group’ as applicable) is a low-cost airline carrier operating principally in 
Europe. The Company is a public limited company (company number 03959649) whose shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange 
under the ticker symbol EZJ and is incorporated and domiciled in the United Kingdom. The address of its registered office is Hangar 89, 
London Luton Airport, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU2 9PF. 

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with international accounting standards in conformity with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 2006, and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adopted pursuant 
to Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 as it applies in the European Union. The financial statements have also been prepared in accordance 
with IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRS IC) interpretations issued and effective at the time of preparing these financial statements. 

Basis of preparation 

The financial statements are prepared based on the historical cost convention except for certain financial assets and liabilities, including 
derivative financial instruments, financial guarantees, equity investments and certain contingent liabilities and commitments, which are 
measured at fair value. 

easyJet’s business activities, together with factors likely to affect its future development and performance, are described in the Strategic 
report on pages 2 to 95. Principal risks and uncertainties are described on pages 78 to 95. Note 25 to the financial statements sets out 
the Group’s objectives, policies and procedures for managing its capital and gives details of the risks related to financial instruments held 
by the Group. 

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. In adopting the going concern basis for preparing these financial 
statements, the Directors have considered easyJet’s business activities, together with factors likely to affect its future development and 
performance, as well as easyJet’s principal risks and uncertainties and liquidity position. 

After taking into account the net proceeds of the rights issue, the new revolving credit facility and the other sources of funding 
described above, easyJet has unrestricted access to £4.4 billion of liquidity and has retained ownership of 59% of the total fleet with 44% 
being unencumbered. This presents an improved liquidity position of £2.1 billion since 30 September 2020 year end. 

In modelling the impact of severe but plausible downside risks, the Directors have considered travel restrictions including government 
lockdowns and international travel bans, leading to a prolonged recovery period, reduction in revenue yield, lower load factors, cash 
collaterisation of unearned revenue by card acquirers, and a reduction to anticipated forward bookings. 

After reviewing the current liquidity position, financial forecasts, stress testing of potential risks and considering the uncertainties 
described above and the committed funding facilities, the Directors believe it appropriate to continue to adopt the going concern basis 
of accounting in preparing the Group financial statements without the inclusion of material uncertainty which has been removed since 
the interim financial statements as at 31 March 2021 and the full year financial statements as at 30 September 2020. 

The use of critical accounting estimates and management judgement is required in applying the accounting policies. Areas involving a 
higher degree of judgement or complexity, or where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements, are 
highlighted on pages 183 to 185. 

Climate change  

In preparing the financial statements, the Directors have considered the impact of climate change, particularly in the context of the 
climate change risks identified in the Sustainability section of the Strategic Report and the Group’s stated target of net zero carbon 
emissions by 2050.  

These considerations did not have a material impact on the financial reporting judgements and estimates in the current year. This reflects 
the conclusion that climate change is not expected to have a significant impact on the Group’s short-term cash flows including those 
considered in the going concern and viability assessments. 

However, in preparing the financial statements, the directors have considered the medium and longer term cash flow impacts of climate 
change on a number of key estimates within the financial statements, including:  

•  the estimates of future cash flows used in impairment assessments of the carrying value of non-current assets;  
•  the estimates of future profitability used in our assessment of the recoverability of deferred tax assets in the UK; and 
•  the revision of the useful economic lives and related residual values for our less fuel-efficient aircraft. 

1a. Significant accounting policies 
The significant accounting policies applied are summarised below. Unless otherwise stated they have been applied consistently to both 
years presented. The explanations of these policies focus on areas where judgement is applied or which are particularly significant in the 
financial statements. 

Basis of consolidation 

The consolidated financial statements incorporate those of easyJet plc and its subsidiaries for the years ended 30 September 2020 and 
2021. A full list of subsidiaries can be found in the Notes to the Company financial statements on page 217. 

A subsidiary is an entity controlled by easyJet plc. Control is achieved when easyJet is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its 
involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power, directly or indirectly, over the investee. 

Intragroup balances, transactions and any unrealised gains and losses arising from intragroup transactions are eliminated in preparing the 
consolidated financial statements. 

175 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

www.easyJet.com

175

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

1. Accounting policies, judgements and estimates continued 
1a. Significant accounting policies continued 

Foreign currencies 

The primary economic environment in which a subsidiary operates determines its functional currency. The consolidated financial 
statements of easyJet are presented in Sterling, rounded to the nearest £ million, which is the Company’s functional currency and the 
Group’s presentation currency. Certain subsidiaries have operations that are primarily influenced by a currency other than Sterling. 
Exchange differences arising on the translation of these foreign operations are taken to shareholders’ equity until all or part of the 
interest is sold, when the relevant portion of the accumulated exchange gains or losses is recognised in the income statement. Profits 
and losses of foreign operations are translated into Sterling at average rates of exchange during the year, since this approximates the 
rates on the dates of the transactions.  

Transactions arising in foreign currencies are recorded using the rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets 
and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into functional currency using the rate of exchange ruling at the end of a 
reporting period and (except where the asset or liability is designated as a cash flow hedge) the gains or losses on translation are 
included in the income statement within Interest receivable and other financing income and Interest payable and other financing charges. 
Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Sterling at foreign exchange rates ruling at the 
dates the transactions were effected.  

Goodwill and other intangible assets 

Goodwill arising on acquisition is recognised as an asset and initially measured at cost, being the excess of the cost of the business 
combination over easyJet’s interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Goodwill is stated at 
cost less any accumulated impairment losses. It has an indefinite expected useful life and is tested for impairment at least annually or 
where there is any indication of impairment. 

Landing rights are stated at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. They are considered to have an indefinite useful life as they will 
remain available for use for the foreseeable future provided minimum utilisation requirements are observed, and are tested for 
impairment at least annually or where there is any indication of impairment. 

Licence agreements to use cloud software are capitalised if easyJet has both a contractual right to the software and the ability to run 
the software independently of the host vendor. If this is not deemed the case the costs are expensed and treated as a service 
agreement. 

When assessing for impairment or reassessing useful economic lives, easyJet consider significant future changes including in relation to 
market, technological, economic and legal developments. The potential future impacts of climate change have been incorporated by 
including the estimated financial impact within cash flow projections of the increased cost of carbon-offsetting, the future estimated 
price of ETS permits and the expected price and quantity required of Sustainable Aviation Fuel usage. 

Other intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation, which is calculated to write off their cost, less estimated 
residual value, on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives. Expected useful lives and residual values are reviewed annually. 

Computer software 

Property, plant and equipment 

Expected useful life 
3-7 years 

Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated to write off the cost, less 
estimated residual value, of assets on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives.  Expected useful lives and residual values are 
reviewed annually. 

Aircraft* 
Aircraft spares 
Aircraft – prepaid maintenance 
Leasehold improvements** 
Freehold land 
Fixtures, fittings and equipment** 
Computer hardware** 

Expected useful life 
18-23 years 
14 years 
7-10 years 
5-10 years or the length of lease if shorter 
Not depreciated 
3 years or length of lease of property where equipment is used if shorter 
3-5 years 

*  Aircraft held as right of use assets are depreciated over the lease term see leases section. Additional capitalised maintenance associated with leased aircraft is 

depreciated based on usage over its expected period of utilisation. 

** ’Other’ assets within note 11. 

176 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
176 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
Residual values are reviewed annually against prevailing market rates at the end of the reporting period for equivalently aged assets and 
depreciation rates are adjusted accordingly on a prospective basis. The carrying value is reviewed for impairment at least annually or 
where there is any indication of impairment within the cash generating unit of which the asset is part. For aircraft, easyJet is dependent 
on Airbus as its sole supplier. This gives rise to an increased valuation risk which crystallises when aircraft exit the fleet, where easyJet is 
reliant on the future demand for second-hand aircraft. Future developments, such as the impact of climate change on the technological, 
market, economic or legal environment, are considered when assessing residual values, useful economic lives and impairment. In the year, 
the expected useful economic life estimate for CEO aircraft was revised from 23 years to 18 years in line with expected usage. This was 
applied prospectively from 1 July 2021 and had an immaterial impact. 

An element of the cost of a new aircraft is attributed on acquisition to prepaid maintenance and is depreciated over a period ranging 
from seven to ten years from the date of manufacture. Subsequent costs incurred which lend enhancement to future periods, such as 
long-term scheduled maintenance and major overhaul of aircraft and engines, are capitalised and depreciated over the length of the 
period benefitting from these enhancements. All other maintenance costs for owned aircraft are charged to the income statement as 
incurred.  

Pre-delivery and option payments made in respect of aircraft are recorded in property, plant and equipment at cost. These amounts are 
not depreciated. Interest attributed to pre-delivery and option payments made in respect of aircraft and other qualifying assets under 
construction are capitalised and added to the cost of the asset concerned. 

Gains and losses on disposals (other than aircraft-related sale and leaseback transactions) are determined by comparing the net 
proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognised in the income statement.  

Freehold land is recorded at cost and not depreciated as it is considered to have an indefinite useful life. 

Leases 

When a contractual arrangement contains a lease easyJet recognises a lease liability and a corresponding right of use asset at the 
commencement of the lease.  

At the commencement date the lease liability is measured at the present value of the future lease payments, discounted using the 
Group’s incremental borrowing rate where the interest rate in the lease is not readily determined. Subsequently, the lease liability is 
adjusted by increasing the carrying amount to reflect interest on the lease liability, reducing the carrying amount to reflect the lease 
payments made and remeasuring the carrying amount to reflect any reassessment or lease modifications.  

The lease term is determined from the commencement date of the lease and the duration of the non-cancellable term. If easyJet has an 
extension option, which it considers it reasonably certain to exercise, then the lease term will be considered to extend beyond that non-
cancellable period. If easyJet has a termination option, which it considers it reasonably certain to exercise, then the lease term will be 
considered to be until the point the termination option will take effect. 

At the commencement date the right of use asset is measured at an amount equal to the lease liability plus any lease payments made 
before the commencement date and any initial direct costs, less any lease incentive payments. An estimate of costs to be incurred in 
restoring an asset, in accordance with the terms of the lease, is also included in the right of use asset at initial recognition. Subsequently, 
the right of use asset is measured in accordance with the accounting policy for property, plant and equipment. Adjustment is also made 
to the right of use asset to reflect any remeasurement of the corresponding lease liability. The right of use assets are also subject to 
impairment testing under IAS 36. 

Short-term leases less than 12 months in length and low-value leases are not recognised as lease liabilities and right of use assets, but are 
recognised as an expense on a straight line basis over the lease term. Payments for the interest element of recognised lease liabilities are 
included in Interest and other financing charges paid within cash flows from operating activities. Payments for the principal element of 
recognised lease liabilities are presented within cash flows from financing activities.  

easyJet periodically enters into sale and leaseback transactions whereby it sells either new or mid-life aircraft or engines to a third party 
and immediately leases them back. For each transaction, where the sale proceeds and lease payments are judged to be at fair value, any 
gain or loss arising on disposal is recognised in the income statement, to the extent that it relates to the rights that have been 
transferred. Gains and losses that relate to the rights that have been retained are included in the carrying amount of the right of use 
asset recognised at commencement of the lease. Where sale proceeds and lease payments are not at fair value, any below market 
terms are recognised as a prepayment of lease payments, and above market terms are recognised as additional financing provided by 
the lessor. Gains on sale and leaseback transactions are recognised in other income, with losses on sale and leaseback transactions 
recognised in other costs. This has been retrospectively applied to the comparative financial year. See note 5 for further details.  

Other non-current assets 

Payments for aircraft and engine maintenance, as stipulated in the respective lease agreements, have historically been made to some 
lessors as security for the performance of future heavy maintenance works. These payments are recorded within current and non-
current assets (as applicable) as receivables from the lessors until the respective maintenance event occurs and the reimbursement with 
the lessor is finalised. Any payment that is not expected to be reimbursed by the lessor is recognised immediately within operating 
expenses in the statement of comprehensive income. Amounts due to easyJet from lessors for maintenance related to use before 
easyJet acquired the aircraft are also recognised in this category. 

Financial guarantees 

If a claim on a financial guarantee given to a third party becomes probable, the obligation is recognised at fair value. For subsequent 
measurement, the carrying amount is the higher of initial measurement and best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the 
obligation at the reporting date. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

177
177 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

1. Accounting policies, judgements and estimates continued 
1a. Significant accounting policies continued 

Tax 

Tax expense in the income statement consists of current and deferred tax. Tax is recognised in the income statement except when it 
relates to items credited or charged directly to other comprehensive income or shareholders’ equity, in which case it is recognised in 
other comprehensive income or shareholders’ equity. The charge for current tax is based on the results for the year as adjusted for 
income that is exempt and expenses that are not deductible, using tax rates that are applicable to the taxable income.   

Deferred tax is provided in full on temporary differences relating to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, where it is probable that 
the recovery or settlement will result in an obligation to pay more, or a right to pay less, tax in the future, with the following exceptions: 

•  where the temporary difference arises from goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and 

liabilities in a transaction that affects neither taxable income nor accounting profit; and 

•  deferred tax arising on investments in subsidiaries is not recognised where easyJet is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference 

and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. 

Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the periods in which recovery of assets and settlement of 
liabilities are expected to take place, based on tax rates or laws enacted or substantively enacted at the date of the statement of 
financial position. 

Deferred tax assets represent amounts recoverable in future periods in respect of deductible temporary differences, losses and tax 
credits carried forwards.  Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that these are estimated to be fully recoverable against the 
unwind of taxable temporary differences and future taxable income. 

Deferred tax liabilities represent the amount of income taxes payable in future periods in respect of taxable temporary differences. 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax 
liabilities and it is the intention to settle these on a net basis. 

Provisions  

Provisions are recognised when a present legal or constructive obligation arises as a result of a past event, it is probable that the Group 
will be required to settle that obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Amounts provided for 
represent the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the statement of financial position date, 
taking into account all related risks and uncertainties.  

Restructuring 
As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, easyJet implemented a major co-ordinated restructuring programme to reduce the number of 
bases, and the number of employees. Provisions have been made based on the expected outcome of consultations with staff, including 
pilots and crew. Where specific individuals at risk have not been identified, estimations have been based on information available such as 
average payroll data, employee age and length of service. 

Customer claims  
Provisions for customer claims comprise amounts payable to customers who make claims in respect of flight delays and cancellations, 
and refunds of air passenger duty or similar charges. Provisions are measured based on known eligible events, passengers impacted and 
historical claim rates. 

Maintenance  
easyJet incurs liabilities for maintenance costs in respect of aircraft leased during the term of the lease. These arise from legal and 
constructive contractual obligations relating to the condition of the aircraft when it is returned to the lessor. On recognition of a right of 
use asset under IFRS 16 a provision is made in full for maintenance not dependent on use of the aircraft, plus maintenance relating to 
previous use, based on hours or cycles flown, to provide for the cost of these obligations. Contractual obligations which are dependent 
on the ongoing use of the aircraft are provided over the term of the lease based on the estimated future costs, discounted to present 
value. These are capitalised to the right of use asset rather than recognised in maintenance in the income statement. These assets are 
depreciated immediately as the obligation has arisen as a result of flying hours already undertaken. 

Other 
Other provisions include amounts in respect of potential liabilities for employee related matters and litigation which arises in the normal 
course of business. 

Employee benefits 

easyJet contributes to defined contribution pension schemes for the benefit of employees (see below for the Swiss scheme treatment). 
The assets of the schemes are held separately from those of easyJet in independently administered funds. easyJet's contributions are 
charged to the income statement in the year in which they are incurred. easyJet has no further payment obligations once the 
contributions have been paid for defined contribution schemes. 

The expected cost of compensated annual leave and other employee benefits is recognised at the time that the related employees' 
services are provided.  

Switzerland pension scheme 
easyJet contributes to an independently administered post-employment fund for employees in Switzerland. The final benefit is 
contribution-based with certain minimum guarantees required by Swiss law. Due to these minimum guarantees, the Swiss pension plan 
meets IAS 19 Employee Benefits requirements to be treated as a defined benefit plan for the purposes of these consolidated financial 
statements.  

178 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
178 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

The easyJet portion of the current service costs and the net interest cost are charged to the consolidated income statement in the year 
in which they relate. Actuarial gains and losses are recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and in the 
consolidated statement of financial position reflects the net surplus or deficit at the statement of financial position date.  

The actuarial assumptions used to calculate the defined benefit obligation are based on the requirements set out in IAS 19. They are set 
by management, based on advice from independent actuaries. The defined benefit obligation is calculated using the projected unit credit 
method. Costs of managing the plan assets are deducted as incurred in determining the return on plan assets and the present value of 
projected future general administration expenses that are a direct consequence of past service are included as part of the retirement 
benefit obligation. 

Share capital and dividend distribution 

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new ordinary shares or options are shown in 
equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.  

Where any Group company or employee benefit trust purchases the Company’s equity shares, the consideration paid and any directly 
attributable incremental costs are deducted from retained earnings until the shares are cancelled or reissued. Proceeds from re-issue are 
shown as a credit to retained earnings. 

easyJet settles share awards under the Long Term Incentive Plan, the Save As You Earn scheme, Restricted Share Plan and Share 
Incentive Plans by purchasing its own shares on the market through employee benefit trusts. The cost of such purchases is deducted 
from retained earnings in the period that the transaction occurs. 

Dividend distributions to the Company’s shareholders are recognised as a liability in the period in which the dividends are approved by the 
Company’s shareholders. 

Share-based payments 

easyJet has a number of equity-settled share incentive schemes. The fair value of share options granted under the Save As You Earn 
scheme is measured at the date of grant using the Binomial Lattice option pricing model. The fair value of grants under the Long Term 
Incentive Plan is measured at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model for awards based on ROCE performance targets, and the 
Stochastic model (also known as the Monte Carlo model) for awards based on TSR performance targets. The fair value of all other 
awards is the share price at the date of grant.  

The fair value of the estimated number of options and awards that are expected to vest is expensed to the income statement on a 
straight-line basis over the period that employees’ services are rendered, with a corresponding increase in shareholders’ equity. Where 
non-market performance criteria (such as ROCE) attached to the share options and awards are not met, any cumulative expense 
previously recognised is reversed. For awards with market-related performance criteria (such as TSR), an expense is recognised 
irrespective of whether the market condition is satisfied.  

The social security obligations payable in connection with the grant of the share options are an integral part of the grant itself and the 
charge is treated as a cash-settled transaction. 

Financial instruments 

Financial instruments are recognised when easyJet becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the relevant instrument and 
derecognised when it ceases to be a party to such provisions. Financial assets are also derecognised (written-off) when the Group has 
no reasonable expectation of recovering the financial asset.  

With the exception of trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component, financial instruments are initially measured 
at fair value plus or minus (in the case of a financial asset or financial liability not at fair value through profit or loss) directly attributable 
transaction costs. Trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component are initially measured at the transaction price. 

Where market values are not available, the fair value of financial instruments is calculated by discounting expected cash flows at 
prevailing interest rates and by applying period end exchange rates.  

The equity investment in The Airline Group Limited is measured at fair value. Movements in fair value are assessed at each reporting 
period and recorded in other comprehensive income. The fair value is measured using a combination of income and market valuation 
techniques in line with IFRS 13 requirements. See note 24 for further details. 

Non-derivative financial assets 

Non-derivative financial assets are classified and measured according to easyJet's business model for managing a specified group of 
financial assets, and the nature of the contractual cash flows arising from that group of financial assets. 

Financial assets measured at amortised cost 

Subsequent to initial recognition, this classification of financial asset is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate 
method.  

Financial assets are measured at amortised cost when both of the following criteria are met: 

•  The financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold financial assets in order to collect contractual cash flows; and 
•  The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the 

principal amounts outstanding. 

Financial assets measured at amortised cost include refundable lease deposits and other refundable lease contributions, restricted cash, 
trade and other receivables, money market deposits and cash and cash equivalents (excluding money market funds).  

Restricted cash comprises cash deposits which have restrictions governing their use and is classified as a current or non-current asset 
based on the estimated remaining length of the restriction.    

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

179
179 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

1. Accounting policies, judgements and estimates continued 
1a. Significant accounting policies continued 
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash held in bank accounts with no access restrictions and bank term deposits and tri-party repos 
repayable on demand or maturing within three months of inception. 

Money market deposits comprise term deposits and tri-party repos maturing greater than three months from inception. 

Financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income 

On initial recognition, equity investments, excluding interests in associates, are irrevocably designated as measured at fair value through 
other comprehensive income. Subsequently they are measured at fair value with changes recognised in other comprehensive income 
with no recycling of these gains and losses. 

Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss 

Financial assets are measured at fair value through profit or loss when they do not meet the criteria to be measured at amortised cost or 
at fair value through other comprehensive income. 

Subsequent to initial recognition, this classification of financial asset is measured at fair value through profit or loss.  

Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss solely comprise money market funds at 30 September 2021.  

Impairment of financial assets measured at amortised cost 

At each reporting date easyJet recognises a loss allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortised cost. 

In establishing the appropriate amount of loss allowance to be recognised, easyJet applies either the general approach or the simplified 
approach, depending on the nature of the underlying group of financial assets. 

General approach --- impairment assessment  

The general approach is applied to the impairment assessment of refundable lease deposits and other refundable lease contributions, 
restricted cash, money market deposits and cash and cash equivalents.  

Under the general approach easyJet recognises a loss allowance for a financial asset at an amount equal to the 12-month expected 
credit losses, unless the credit risk on the financial asset has increased significantly since initial recognition, in which case a loss allowance 
is recognised at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses. 

Simplified approach --- impairment assessment 

The simplified approach is applied to the impairment assessment of trade and other receivables. 

Under the simplified approach easyJet always recognises a loss allowance for a financial asset at an amount equal to the lifetime 
expected credit losses. 

Non-derivative financial liabilities 

Non-derivative financial liabilities are initially recorded at fair value less directly attributable transaction costs, and subsequently at 
amortised cost, and include trade and other payables and borrowings. Interest expense on borrowings is recognised using the effective 
interest method. 

Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless there is an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months 
after the reporting period date. 

Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost 

Subsequent to initial recognition, this classification of financial asset is measured at fair value through profit or loss.  

Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost include trade and other payables, lease liabilities and borrowings. 

Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities 

Derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value through profit or loss with the exception of derivative financial instruments that 
are designated as a hedging instrument in a cash flow for hedge relationship.  

easyJet uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge foreign currency risks on transactions denominated in US dollars, Euros or 
Swiss francs. These transactions primarily affect revenue, fuel, fixed costs, and the carrying value of owned aircraft. easyJet also uses 
cross-currency interest rate swaps to hedge currency and interest rate risk on certain borrowings, and jet fuel forward swap and option 
contracts to hedge fuel price risks. Hedge accounting is applied to those derivative financial instruments that are designated as cash flow 
hedges or fair value hedges. 

Fair value hedges 

Changes in the fair values of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in the income statement, 
together with any changes in the fair values of the hedged assets or liabilities that are attributable to the hedged risk. Any differences 
between the hedge item and hedge instrument fair valuation is recorded as hedge ineffectiveness as a non-headline item within the 
income statement. 

Fair value changes in the derivative instrument attributable to currency basis are not designated as part of the hedged instrument. Such 
fair value changes are recognised through other comprehensive income as a cost of hedging and are recycled to profit or loss on a 
rational basis, according to the nature of the underlying hedged item. 

180 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
180  easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

Cash flow hedges 

Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of foreign exchange forwards, jet fuel forward swaps, jet fuel options and cross-
currency interest rate swap contracts designated as cash flow hedges are recognised in other comprehensive income and deferred in 
the hedging reserve to the extent that the hedges are determined to be effective.  

All foreign exchange contracts in a cash flow hedge relationship are designated on a forward basis with the full fair value as the hedge 
instrument. Jet fuel option contracts in a cash flow hedge relationship are designated using the intrinsic value of the derivative as the 
hedge instrument only. The time value element of the full fair value for these derivatives is recognised through other comprehensive 
income as a cost of hedging and recycled to profit or loss at the same time as the hedge item also impacts profit and loss. 

Fair value changes in foreign currency derivative instruments attributable to currency basis are not designated as part of the hedged 
instrument. Such fair value changes are recognised through other comprehensive income as a cost of hedging and are recycled to profit 
or loss on a rational basis, according to the nature of the underlying hedged item. All other changes in fair value are recognised 
immediately in the income statement.  

When the hedged forecast transaction relates to an item of property, plant and equipment, the relevant accumulated gains and losses 
are transferred from the hedging reserve and included in the initial carrying amount of that purchased asset. Otherwise they are 
recognised in the income statement in the same period in which the hedged transaction affects the income statement and against the 
same line item. 

In the event that a hedged forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, any related gains and losses are immediately transferred 
from the hedging reserve and recognised in the income statement. Derivative instruments that have been derecognised from hedge 
relationships are classified as fair value through profit or loss thereafter with subsequent fair valuation movements impacting the income 
statement. 

Hedge accounting is discontinued when a hedging instrument is derecognised (e.g. through expiry, disposal or termination of a 
derivative), or no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Where the hedged item continues to be expected to occur, the related gains and 
losses remain deferred in the hedging reserve until the transaction takes place. 

Hedge relationship 

The Group determines that the criteria for each hedge accounting relationship are met when: 

•  All relationships demonstrate a strong economic correlation; 
•  The effects of credit do not dominate the change in value of the associated hedged risk; and 
•  All Group hedge relationships have a hedge ratio of one to one, aligning to the Group’s risk management strategy. 

UK and EU ETS permits 

Free allocations received from the government under the EU ETS scheme are recognised at fair value on the date received with a 
corresponding liability recognised. Purchased carbon credits are recognised at the purchase price. Both purchased and free credits are 
not subsequently revalued as they are held for own use. Carbon assets are derecognised when they are used to settle the ETS liabilities 
subsequent to the end of each calendar year. These assets are presented as current intangible assets and are reviewed for impairment 
annually or when there is an indication of impairment within the airline cash generating unit. 

Revenue recognition 

easyJet categorises total revenue earned on the face of the income statement between passenger and ancillary revenue. Passenger 
revenue arises from the sale of flight seats and administration fees and is measured as the price paid by the customer. Passenger 
revenue is recognised when the performance obligation has been completed. This is when the flight takes place. Amounts paid by ‘no-
show’ customers are recognised as passenger revenue when the booked service is provided, as such customers are not generally entitled 
to change flights or seek refunds once a flight has departed.  

Ancillary revenue includes revenue from the provision of checked baggage, allocated seating and change fees, package holidays revenue 
(excluding flights which are recognised as passenger revenue) and revenue arising from commissions earned from services sold on 
behalf of partners and inflight sales. It is measured as the price paid by the customer for the service booked. Ancillary revenue is 
recognised when the performance obligation is complete, which is generally when the related flight takes place, with the following 
exceptions: 

•  cancellation fees which are recognised when the cancellation requested by the customer is processed; and 
•  in the case of commission earned from travel insurance, revenue is recognised at the time of booking as easyJet acts solely as appointed 

representative of the insurance company. 

Package holiday revenue is recognised evenly over the duration of the holiday. Package holiday revenue is measured as the price paid by 
the customer for the service booked. 

Airline flights and package holiday deposits are paid for at the point of booking. Package holiday balances due from customers are offset 
against the customer deferred revenue until paid in full, due 28 days before departure. Unearned revenue from flights not yet flown is 
held in the statement of financial position until it is realised in the income statement when the performance obligation is complete and 
until then represents a contract liability. Unearned revenue also includes non-flight elements of package holidays for which the customer 
has paid but has not yet taken place, and is held in the statement of financial position until it is realised in the income statement when 
the performance obligation is complete. Vouchers issued by easyJet in lieu of refunds are held in the statement of financial position in 
other payables as a contract liability until they are redeemed against a new booking, at which point they are recognised as unearned 
revenue, or when the performance obligation is complete, at which point they will be recognised as revenue. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

181
181 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

1. Accounting policies, judgements and estimates continued 
1a. Significant accounting policies continued 
If easyJet cancels a flight or holiday, unless a customer immediately re-books on an alternative flight or holiday, at the point of the 
cancellation the amount paid for the flight is derecognised from unearned revenue and a contract liability is recognised within trade and 
other payables to refund the customer or provide a voucher or flight transfer if requested. easyJet make an estimate of the proportion 
of this liability which will never be claimed by customers and recognises this as income.  

Some of the compensation payments made to customers (in respect of flight delays) are offset against revenues recognised up to the 
amount of the flight, with the excess compensation being recorded within expenses.  

Revenue from easyJet plus cards is recognised evenly over time in line with when the performance obligations are expected to arise. 
Revenue from easyJet plus cards for the current financial year totalled £14 million (2020: £22 million). 

Segmental reporting  

easyJet has two operating segments, being its Airline business, which operates easyJet’s route network, and the Holidays business, which 
sells holiday packages. The Chief Operating Decision Maker has been assessed as the easyJet plc Board, which receives regular reporting 
on the Airline and Holidays results in order to make resource allocation decisions. Presentation of separate segmental reporting is 
included in note 8. 

Geographic revenue is allocated on the following bases:  

•  revenue earned from customers is allocated according to the location of the first departure airport on each booking; and  
•  commission revenue earned from partners is allocated according to the domicile of each partner. 

Passenger revenue recognised within the Airline segment includes intra-segment sales of flights to the Holidays segment. Passenger 
revenue is recognised in the Airline segment when the flight takes place. 

Carbon offsetting and Verified Emission Reductions  

easyJet operates a voluntary policy to compensate for every tonne of carbon and carbon equivalents (collectively ‘carbon’) emitted from 
fuel used for all its flights, by investing in projects which will mean there is one tonne less in the atmosphere - whether by reducing 
carbon by physically removing it from the air or by avoiding the release of additional carbon.  

easyJet purchases Verified Emission Reductions (VERs) arising from Gold Standard or Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) accredited 
projects to offset the carbon emitted from flights. The cost of purchasing VERs is recognised in the income statement when the flight 
occurs with a corresponding carbon offsetting liability. This is measured using the purchase price of VERs on a First In First Out basis 
where they have already been purchased, then a weighted average of expected future purchases where sufficient future VER purchase 
commitments are already in place. If there are insufficient future commitments, a market value would be used. At present there is excess 
VER commitments when compared to the current liability. VERs are recorded as an asset at historic cost when delivery into the easyJet 
registry account has taken place and not subsequently revalued. At regular intervals the VERs are retired to settle the obligation, at which 
point the VER asset and carbon offsetting liability are derecognised. 

Voluntary change in accounting policy  

Foreign exchange gains and losses arising from the revaluation of monetary assets and liabilities have historically been classified as non-
headline items. During the year it was concluded that these gains and losses would be more appropriately classified as headline items, as 
they are considered to be reflective of the trading performance of the business.  

Due to the immaterial value in the prior year, no reclassification has been made in the comparative year. 

The initial charges for discontinuation of hedge accounting applied to derivative financial instruments entered before the Covid-19 
pandemic are still recognised as non-headline items, however any on-going fair value movements from these derivative financial 
instruments will now be classified as headline items due to easyJet's ability to manage those positions. 

Government grants 

Government grants are recognised where there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received. Loans provided and/or 
guaranteed by governments that represent market rates of interest are recorded at the amount of the proceeds received and 
recognised within borrowings. All existing loans are considered to be at market value. Grants that compensate the Group for expenses 
incurred are recognised in the income statement in the relevant financial statement line on a systematic basis in the periods in which the 
expenses are recognised to present the net expense to the Group. 

Alternative performance measures (APMs)  

Within the financial statements on pages 170 to 212, a number of APMs have been disclosed which the Directors consider key to 
assessing underlying performance. Refer to the glossary for a list of APMs disclosed in the financial statements, including definitions and 
reconciliations to IFRS measures. 

New and revised standards and interpretations 

A number of amended standards became applicable during the current reporting period. The Group did not have to change its 
accounting policies or make retrospective adjustments as a result of adopting these standards. The amendments that became applicable 
for annual reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2020, and did not have a material impact were: 

•  IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements & IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors – Definition of material; 
•  IFRS 3 Business Combinations – Definition of business; 
•  IFRS 16 Leases – Amendments in relation to Covid-19 related rent concessions; and  
•  Revised conceptual framework for financial reporting.  

There are no standards that are issued but not yet effective that would be expected to have a material impact on the Group in the 
current or future reporting periods and on foreseeable future transactions. 

182 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
182 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

1b.Critical accounting judgements and estimates 
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates 
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported 
amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Although these amounts are based on management’s best estimates, 
events or actions may mean that actual results ultimately differ from those estimates, and these differences may be material. The 
estimates and the underlying assumptions are reviewed regularly.  

1b.(i) Critical accounting judgements 
The following are the critical judgements, apart from those involving estimations (which are dealt with separately below), that the 
Directors have made in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts 
recognised and presented in the financial statements. 

Classification of income or expenses between headline and non-headline items (note 5) 

The Group seeks to present a measure of underlying performance which is not impacted by material non-recurring items or items which 
are not considered to be reflective of the trading performance of the business. This measure of profit is described as ‘headline’ and is 
used by the Directors to measure and monitor performance. The excluded items are referred to as ‘non-headline’ items.  

Non-headline items may include impairments, amounts relating to acquisitions and disposals, expenditure on major restructuring 
programmes, litigation and insurance settlements, the income or expense resulting from the initial recognition of sale and lease back 
transactions, fair value adjustments on financial instruments and other particularly significant or unusual non-recurring items. Items 
relating to the normal trading performance of the business will always be included within the headline performance.  

Judgement is required in determining the classification of items between headline and non-headline. In line with Financial Reporting 
Council (FRC) guidance, easyJet has not attempted to identify additional non-headline items as a direct or indirect result of Covid-19, 
other than those items which clearly meet our existing definition of non-headline, such as hedge discontinuation, restructuring and asset 
impairment. See ‘Voluntary change in accounting policy’ note above for changes in classifications in the year.  

Consolidation of easyJet Switzerland 

Judgement has been applied in consolidating easyJet Switzerland S.A. as a subsidiary on the basis that the Company exercises a 
dominant influence over the undertaking. A non-controlling interest has not been reflected in the consolidated financial statements on 
the basis that holders of the remaining 51% of the shares have no entitlement to any dividends from that holding and the Company has 
an option to acquire those shares for a pre-determined minimal consideration.  

Vouchers issued  

Due to the amount of cancelled flights, easyJet continues to offer customers the option to accept vouchers in lieu of cash refunds. The 
liability for vouchers is classified as other payables until the voucher is redeemed against a future booking when it is reclassified to 
unearned revenue. Breakage may occur if customers do not redeem their voucher prior to expiry and would be recognised in revenue. 
The liability has been recorded in full as no vouchers have yet expired, and due to the significant level of flight cancellations as a result of 
the pandemic impact there is not sufficient historical data available to reliably estimate the amount of vouchers that will not be used prior 
to expiry. To date no vouchers have expired as the vouchers have had the expiry dates extended to ensure customers have the 
maximum opportunity to utilise their vouchers. Applying breakage at 10% would result in a c. £20 million reduction to the liability. 

Sale and leaseback transactions 

Judgement is required when determining if sale and leaseback proceeds and lease rentals are at fair value. The sale and leaseback 
transactions completed in the year have been assessed with reference to external valuations specific to the easyJet fleet and deemed to 
be at fair value. The accounting treatment would have been different if the transactions had not been at fair value (see leases 
accounting policy). 

Contingent liability recognition 

On 19 May 2020, easyJet announced that it had been the target of a cyber-attack from a highly sophisticated source. The email 
addresses and travel details of approximately 9 million customers were accessed and for a very small subset of customers (2,208), credit 
card details were accessed.  

The cyber-attack continues to be under investigation by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). As the cyber-attack took place 
before the United Kingdom left the European Union, the Group expects the ICO to be investigating on behalf of all EU data protection 
authorities as lead supervisory authority under the GDPR. Any penalty or enforcement action will need to be reviewed and approved by 
the other EU data protection authorities under the GDPR's cooperation process. In addition, in May 2020, a class action claim was filed in 
the UK High Court by a law firm representing a class of affected customers and claims have also been commenced or threatened in 
certain other courts and jurisdictions.  

Judgement has been applied in assessing the merit, likely outcome and potential impact on the Group of the continued investigation by 
the ICO, group action and other claims. These are still subject to a number of significant uncertainties and therefore the Group is unable 
to assess the likely outcome or quantum of the claims as at the date of these financial statements. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

183
183 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

1. Accounting policies, judgements and estimates continued 
1b.(ii) Critical accounting estimates 
The following critical accounting estimates involve a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or are areas where assumptions are 
significant to the financial statements.  The critical accounting estimates concerned are the major sources of estimation uncertainty that 
have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next year. 

Aircraft maintenance provisions - £550 million (2020: £597 million) (note 18) 

The most critical estimate required for the provision is considered to be the expected costs of the heavy maintenance checks at the time 
they are expected to occur. Other estimates also impacting the provision include the future utilisation of the aircraft, the condition of the 
aircraft, the lifespan of life-limited parts and the rate used to discount the provision. 

easyJet incurs liabilities for maintenance costs in respect of aircraft leased during the term of the lease. These arise from legal and 
constructive contractual obligations relating to the condition of the aircraft when it is returned to the lessor. To discharge these 
obligations, easyJet will also normally need to carry out one heavy maintenance check on each of the engines and the airframe during 
the lease term.  

The bases of all estimates are reviewed at least annually, and when information becomes available that is capable of causing a material 
change to an estimate, such as renegotiation of end of lease return conditions, increased or decreased aircraft utilisation, or changes in 
the cost of heavy maintenance services. Given the much increased uncertainty in forecasting future maintenance requirements, and the 
associated judgemental nature of the assumptions applied in determining the maintenance provision, management believe that a 
reasonable combination of changes to these estimates could result in a material movement to the carrying value of the provision. A 5% 
movement in the estimated cost of final maintenance events would result in a £24 million movement to the provision. 

Goodwill and landing rights - £533 million (2020: £533 million) (note 10) 

The recoverable amount of goodwill and landing rights has been determined based on value in use calculations for the whole airline route 
network cash generating unit. The value in use is determined by discounting future cash flows to their present value. When applying this 
method, easyJet relies on a number of key estimates including the ability to meet its strategic plans, future fuel prices, the ability to pass 
on cost price increases to the customer, exchange rates, long-term economic growth rates for the principal countries in which it 
operates, and its pre-tax weighted average cost of capital. Strategic plans incorporate estimations of the future impact of climate 
change on easyJet, this includes the future financial impact within cash flow projections of the increased cost of carbon-offsetting, the 
future estimated price of ETS permits and the expected price and quantity required of Sustainable Aviation Fuel usage. 

Fuel price and exchange rates continue to be volatile in nature but the assumptions used assume the ability to pass these on to the 
customer (see Note 10 for plausible scenarios). In addition, assumptions over the recovery of customer demand levels could have a 
significant effect on the impairment assessment performed. Due to the uncertainty created by the Covid-19 pandemic, there remains a 
risk that further waves of the pandemic could affect our markets, leading to further travel restrictions being imposed. These uncertainties 
could have an effect on future impairment or useful economic life assessments performed. 

Defined benefit pension assumptions --- £152 million gross obligation (2020: £153 million gross obligation) (note 19) 

The Swiss pension scheme meets the requirements under IAS 19 to be recognised as a defined benefit pension scheme and the net 
pension obligation is recognised in the statement of financial position. The measurement of scheme assets and obligations are calculated 
by an independent actuary in line with IAS 19. The financial and demographic assumptions used in the calculation are determined by 
management following consultation with the independent actuary with consideration of external market movements and inputs. The 
calculation is most sensitive to movements in the discount rate applied to the future obligation and a sensitivity analysis is included in 
note 19.  

Derivative financial instruments --- £203 million net asset (2020: £327 million net liability) (note 24) 

easyJet is exposed to financial risks including fluctuations in exchange rates, jet fuel prices and interest rates. Financial risk management 
aims to limit these market risks with selected derivative hedging instruments being used for this purpose. The Group holds a number of 
derivatives and financial instruments including foreign currency forward contracts, jet fuel forward and option contracts and cross-
currency interest rate swap contracts. easyJet’s policy is not to speculatively trade derivatives but to use the instruments to hedge 
anticipated exposure. Given the inherently complex nature of this area, the Finance Committee (a committee of the Board) oversees the 
Group’s treasury and funding policies and activities. 

Provisions for customer claims --- £21 million (2020: £39 million) (note 18) 

easyJet incurs liabilities for amounts payable to customers who make claims in respect of flight delays and cancellations, and refunds of 
air passenger duty or similar charges, for which claims could be made up to 6 years after the event. Estimates include passenger claim 
rates, the value of claims made and the period of time over which claims will be made. The bases of all estimates are reviewed at least 
annually and also when information becomes available that is capable of causing a material change to the estimate. A 5% movement in 
the estimated customer claim rate would result in a £1 million movement to the provision. 

Hedge discontinuation and ineffectiveness – £26 million charge (2020: £311 million charge) (note 25) 

As a result of the reduced flying programme throughout the year, the Group’s near-term exposures for jet fuel and foreign currency were 
reduced, causing a proportion of derivatives previously hedge accounted for to be discontinued from a hedge relationship. A net charge 
of £26 million has been recognised as a non-headline item in the income statement primarily due to the discontinuation in the year of 
hedge accounting for impacted derivatives. In assessing whether future exposures are still expected to occur, easyJet made estimates as 
at 30 September 2021 regarding its jet fuel consumption requirements and expected future foreign currency cash flows. These estimates 
used assumptions based on the expected recovery of customer demand and subsequent flying schedule as at that date. See note 25 for 
details of the split between headline and non-headline for hedge discontinuation. 

184 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
184 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

Aircraft carrying values --- £3,559 million (2020: 4,333 million) --- (note 11) 

Aircraft asset recoverable amounts have been tested for impairment based on value in use at the airline route network cash generating 
unit level as described in the goodwill section above. Strategic plans incorporate estimations of the future impact of climate change on 
easyJet, this includes the future financial impact within cash flow projections of the increased cost of carbon-offsetting, the future 
estimated price of ETS permits and the expected price and quantity required of Sustainable Aviation Fuel usage. The recoverable 
amounts exceed the carrying values as at 30 September 2021.  

Aircraft are depreciated over their useful economic life to their residual values in line with the property, plant and equipment accounting 
policy. A review has been performed during the current financial year and the useful economic life and residual value amounts for aircraft 
and capitalised maintenance have been revised in line with the latest information available. This included the expected useful economic 
life estimate for CEO aircraft revised from 23 years to 18 years in line with expected usage and the residual value for aircraft revised 
based on reports obtained from independent aircraft valuation experts. The revised estimates led to a net accelerated depreciation of 
the fleet on a prospective basis from 1 July 2021. The changes increased the depreciation charge by c.£13 million in the financial year 
2021. This increase is expected to annualise at £47 million in financial year 2022. The change in depreciation charge is non-cash. 

However, in light of the global pandemic, the longer-term impact on the airline industry is currently uncertain and the market for  
aircraft transactions has also slowed. Should future demand fall significantly below current expectations there could be a risk that the 
recoverable amount for some aircraft assets falls below their current carrying value or that residual values are subject to significant 
deterioration.  

Recoverability of deferred tax assets - £425 million (2020: £275 million) (note 6) 

The deferred tax asset balances include £425 million (2020: £275 million) arising on full recognition of the UK trading tax losses 
accumulated at the statement of financial position date. The Group has concluded that these deferred tax assets will be fully recoverable 
against the unwind of taxable temporary differences and future taxable income based on the long term strategic plans of the Group. 
Where applicable the financial projections used in assessing future taxable income are consistent with those used elsewhere across the 
business for example in the assessment of the carrying value of goodwill. These assessments include the expected impact of climate 
change on easyJet and the future financial impact within cash flow projections of the increased cost of carbon-offsetting, the future 
estimated price of ETS permits and the expected price and quantity required of Sustainable Aviation Fuel usage. 

The tax losses for which a deferred tax asset has been recognised are expected to be utilised within the next eight years, based on 
probable forecast future taxable income. Probable forecast future taxable income includes an incremental and increasing risk weighting 
to represent higher levels of uncertainty in future periods. 

The loss utilisation has been stress tested by assessing probable future taxable income for the next five years, based on the same risk 
weightings to those applied above, but assuming no profit growth from the end of a five year forecast period. The resultant reduction in 
forecast taxable profit calculated on this basis would extend the tax loss utilisation period by two years. 

The tax losses can be carried forward indefinitely and have no expiry date. 

1c. New and revised standards and interpretations not applied 
In September 2019 the IASB issued the first accounting amendment to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 related to the upcoming IBOR reform and to 
address the impact that the current uncertainty could have when applying specific hedge accounting requirements on applicable hedge 
relationships. In particular, the amendment provides temporary relief to allow hedge accounting to continue during the transition period 
before IBOR based hedge items or instruments are amended as a result of the reform being completed. 

The Group early adopted this amendment in the financial year ending September 2020, applying it retrospectively to accounting 
relationships that existed before the start of the current reporting period. The impacts of IBOR reform on the Group is assessed as being 
limited, with this amendment only applicable to one hedge relationship as at 30 September 2021.  

Specifically the amendment impacts the fair value hedge relationship on one of the Group’s Eurobonds, where a cross-currency interest 
rate swap (with a Sterling notional of £379 million, maturity of February 2023 and a fair value of £53 million in an asset position) is used 
to swap the fixed interest coupon of the Euro denominated debt into a floating interest rate, reset quarterly using future expected  
GBP LIBOR. In assessing hedge effectiveness on a prospective basis for this relationship, the Group has continued to assume that the 
GBP-LIBOR related interest cash flows on the swap are not altered by IBOR reform and the hedge continues to be highly effective.  

Furthermore, hedge accounting did not need to be discontinued during the period of IBOR-related uncertainty as the Group has taken 
the relief available in Phase 1 to separately identify the risk component at the initial hedge designation and not on an ongoing basis.  

In August 2020, IASB also issued Phase 2 amendments which are effective from 1 January 2021. This looked to address issues around 
the updating of hedge designations and documentation following the adoption of alternative benchmark rates. The Group is not 
adopting these amendments currently due to continued uncertainty over IBOR transition. Therefore, no amendments have been made to 
the hedged item and/or hedging instruments in the 2021 financial year. 

In October 2020 the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) released its IBOR fallback protocol to aid the IBOR transition. 
In June 2021 the Group signed up to this protocol as part of its approach to the transition. 

During the year a LIBOR transition working group was formed to consider wider impacts on the business of changes. Key areas that this 
group reviewed included existing supplier contracts, debt financing, leases, inter-company loan agreements and discount rates. No 
material impacts were identified as part of this review.      

There are no other standards that are issued but not yet effective that would be expected to have a material impact on the Group in the 
current or future reporting periods and on foreseeable future transactions. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

185
185 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

2. Net finance charges 

Interest receivable and other financing income 
Interest income 
Hedge discontinuation (1) 
Net exchange gains on monetary assets and liabilities (2) 

Interest payable and other financing charges 
Hedge discontinuation (1) 
Interest payable on bank and other borrowings 
Interest payable on lease liabilities 
Other interest payable 
Net exchange losses on monetary assets and liabilities 

Net finance charges 

2021 
£ million 

2020
£ million 

 1  
(74) 
(10) 
(83) 

92  
75  
42  
– 
– 
209  
126  

(11) 
(106) 
– 
(117) 

411  
36  
24  
15  
5  
491  
374  

1.  See Note 25 for details of the split between headline and non-headline for hedge discontinuation. 
2.  Included within net exchange gains on monetary assets and liabilities is a £15 million loss (2020: £13 million loss) relating to the fair value loss on USD foreign 

exchange derivatives designated as fair value through profit and loss. 

3 Loss before tax 
The following have been included in arriving at loss before tax: 

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 
   Owned assets 
   Right of use assets 
Loss on disposal of intangibles 
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment 
Gain on sale and leaseback 

2021 
£ million 

2020
£ million 

234 
222 
– 
30 
(65) 

256 
229 
19 
11 
(38) 

The sale of EU ETS assets in the prior year resulted in a remeasurement of the EU ETS liability which reduced 2020 fuel costs by £33 
million. 

Auditors’ remuneration  

During the year easyJet incurred fees payable for the audit of the Group and individual financial statements from easyJet’s auditors 
and their associates (including foreign partners) totalling £1.1 million (2020: £0.8 million). In addition, easyJet incurred audit-related  
non-audit services fees of £0.2 million (2020: audit-related fees of £0.1 million) from its auditors. This includes the fee of £0.1 million  
(2020: £0.1 million) in respect of the half year review performed. During the year other assurance related non-audit services fees of 
£1.2 million were also incurred in relation to work associated with the rights issue in September 2021. The rights issue assurance work, 
where PwC acted as the Reporting Accountant, was one-off in nature and only commenced following approval from the FRC as the 
work resulted in the 70% fee cap being exceeded. 

4 Employees 
The average monthly number of people employed by easyJet was: 

Flight and ground operations 
Sales, marketing and administration 

Employee costs for easyJet were: 

Wages and salaries 
Social security costs 
Pension costs 
Share-based payments 

2021 
Number 
11,480 
909 
12,389 

2021 
£ million 
472 
69 
67 
15 
623 

2020
Number 
13,581 
985 
14,566 

2020
£ million 
690 
77 
77 
18 
862 

Included in the pension costs is £7 million (2020: £6 million) related to pension schemes treated as a defined benefit scheme under IAS 19.  

Included in employee costs for 2021 is a benefit of £61 million from the release of restructuring provisions within non-headline  
(2020: £123 million restructuring costs). Refer to note 5 for further details.  

The amounts received under government 'Furlough' schemes offset the employee costs in the Income statement. Refer to note 27 for 
further details. 

186 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
186 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Key management compensation was: 

Short-term employee benefits 
Share-based payments 

2021
£ million 
6 
2 
8 

2020
£ million 
6 
– 
6 

The Directors of easyJet plc and the other members of the Airline Management Board are easyJet's key management as they have 
collective authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the business. 

Emoluments paid or payable to the Directors of easyJet plc were: 

Remuneration 

Details of Directors' remuneration are disclosed in the Directors' remuneration report on pages 130 to 153. 

5. Non-headline items 
An analysis of the amounts presented as non-headline is given below: 

Sale and leaseback gain 
Restructuring (release)/charge 
Impairment  

Recognised in operating loss 
Fair value adjustment and hedge discontinuation 
Statement of financial position foreign exchange charge 

Total non-headline (credit)/charge before tax 
Tax charge/(credit) on non-headline items 

Total non-headline (credit)/charge after tax 

Sale and leaseback gain 

2021
£ million 
3 
3 

2020
£ million 
2 
2 

Year ended
30 September 
2021
£ million 
(65) 
(61) 
– 
(126) 
26 
– 
(100) 
58 
(42) 

Year ended
30 September 
2020
£ million 
(38) 
123 
37 
122 
311 
5 
438 
(84) 
354 

During the year, easyJet completed the sale and leaseback of 7 A319 (2020: 17), 24 A320 (2020: 9) and 4 A321 (2020: 7)  
and 2 engines (2020: nil). The Income Statement impact of the 35 aircraft and 2 engine sale and leasebacks was a £79 million gain 
(2020: £45 million gain) recognised in Other income offset by a £14 million loss (2020: £7 million loss) recognised in Other costs. 

The prior year net gain of £38 million has been reclassified on the face of the Income statement to present £45 million of gains within 
Other income and £7 million of losses within Other costs. There is no net impact on EBITDAR or the loss before tax. 

Restructuring 

As a result of the ongoing restructuring programme and continuing negotiations with unions, restructuring provisions have been 
remeasured throughout the year.  As a result of this, a credit of £61 million (2020: £123 million of costs) has been recognised as non-
headline within Other costs where the initial expense was recognised. As at 30 September 2021 there were unpaid amounts of £18 million 
(2020: £101 million) for those consultations which have not been finalised and settled. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

187
187 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

5. Non-headline items continued 

Impairment  

In 2020 due to lower forecasted customer demand, the Group reassessed the fleet capacity and utilisation requirements leading to  
34 leased aircraft being permanently removed from commercial service. These assets were not utilised again before being returned to 
the lessor at the end of their existing lease term and therefore did not generate any further economic benefit. As a result, an impairment 
charge of £37 million was recognised in 2020 for these aircraft and was categorised as non-headline in the income statement, along with 
an equivalent reduction within right of use assets.  

Fair value adjustment and hedge discontinuation 

This relates to hedge accounting ineffectiveness for items currently held in fair value and cash flow hedge relationships, and the 
cumulative fair value of derivatives at the time of being discontinued from a previous hedge accounting relationship. 

In accordance with IFRS 9, hedge effectiveness testing is performed on a regular, periodic basis. For cash flow hedges this includes an 
assessment of highly probable future cash exposures with the amount compared to the notional of derivatives held in a hedge 
relationship. In the 2021 financial year, due to the reduced commercial flying, easyJet was in an over-hedged position from both a jet fuel 
and FX perspective. As the forecast exposures were no longer expected to occur, these previously hedged amounts no longer qualify for 
hedge accounting. In the 2021 financial year, cumulative fair value movement of a £25 million loss (2020: £311 million loss) related to 
these discontinued derivatives held in Other Comprehensive Income was immediately recorded in the income statement.  Subsequent 
fair value movement of a £30 million gain on these discontinued derivatives was recognised as a headline item. 

Additionally, fair value adjustments of £1 million (2020: £nil) were recorded during the period related to hedge ineffectiveness on hedges 
of foreign currency denominated borrowings that continue to be effective hedge relationships. This hedge ineffectiveness arises as the 
value of hedged items are adjusted for changes in fair value attributable to the hedged risks, which are not perfectly offset by the fair 
value change on the hedging instruments due to factors such as in counterparty credit risk, cash flow timing or amount changes. 

Statement of financial position foreign exchange charge 

This relates to foreign exchange gains or losses arising from the re-translation of monetary assets and liabilities held in the statement of 
financial position, which have been reclassified as headline items in the current year (see Voluntary change in policy section of note 1).  
A £9 million gain was recognised as a headline item (2020: £5 million charge recognised as non-headline).  

6. Tax credit 
Tax on loss on ordinary activities 

Current tax 
Adjustments in respect of UK tax for prior years 
Foreign tax 
Total current tax charge 

Deferred tax 
Temporary differences relating to property, plant and equipment 
Other temporary differences 
Adjustments in respect of prior years 
Remeasurement of opening balances due to change in tax rates 
Total deferred tax credit 

Total tax credit 

Effective tax rate 

2021 
£ million 

2020
£ million 

5 
4 
9 

(36) 
(189) 
7 
31 
(187) 

(178) 

(1) 
6 
5 

41 
(275) 
(1) 
36 
(199) 

(194) 

17.2% 

15.3% 

188 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
188 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reconciliation of the total tax credit 
The tax for the year is lower than (2020: lower than) the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK as set out below: 

Loss before tax 
Tax credit at 19.0% (2020: 19.0%) 
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes 
Share-based payments 
Adjustments in respect of prior years - current tax 
Adjustments in respect of prior years - deferred tax 
Difference in applicable rates for current and deferred tax 
Attributable to rates other than standard UK rate 
Change in substantively enacted tax rate 
Movement in provisions  
IFRS 16 restricted gain 

Total tax credit 

2021
£ million 
(1,036) 
(197) 
2 
2 
5 
7 
(54) 
2 
31 
(1) 
25 
(178) 

2020
£ million 
(1,273) 
(242) 
1 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
– 
1 
36 
(1) 
14 
(194) 

Current tax payable at 30 September 2021 amounted to £2 million (2020: £7 million receivable). This is related to tax payable in other 
European jurisdictions.  

During the year ended 30 September 2021, net cash tax received amounted to £1 million (2020: £13 million). 

The Finance Act 2016 included legislation to reduce the main rate of UK corporation tax from 20% to 19% from 1 April 2017 and to 17% 
from 1 April 2020. The rate reduction to 17% was subsequently reversed by the Finance Act 2020, such that the main rate of UK 
corporation tax from 1 April 2021 remains at 19%. The Finance Act 2021 confirmed an increase of UK corporation tax rate from 19% to 
25% with effect from 1 April 2023 and this was substantively enacted by the statement of financial position date and therefore included 
in these financial statements. Temporary differences have been remeasured using the enacted tax rates that are expected to apply 
when the liability is settled or the asset realised. 

Tax on items recognised directly in other comprehensive income/(loss) or shareholders' equity: 

Charge/(credit) to other comprehensive income/(loss) 
Deferred tax on change in fair value of cash flow hedges 
Deferred tax on post-employment benefit  

Deferred tax 
The net deferred tax (asset)/liability in the statement of financial position is as follows: 

2021
£ million 

2020
£ million 

(93) 
(4) 

56 
– 

At 1 October 2020 
Charged/(credited) to income 
statement 
Charged to other comprehensive loss 

At 30 September 2021 

Accelerated 
capital 
allowances
£ million 
386 

Short-term 
timing 
differences
£ million 
(7) 

Fair value 
(gains)/ losses
£ million 
(43) 

Share-based 
payments
£ million 
(2) 

Post-
employment 
benefit 
obligation 
£ million 
(8) 

Trading loss
£ million 
(275) 

Total
£ million 
51 

(13) 
– 
373 

(19) 
– 
(26) 

1 
93 
51 

(1) 
– 
(3) 

(5) 
4 
(9) 

(150) 
– 
(425) 

(187) 
97 
(39) 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax 
liabilities and it is the intention to settle these on a net basis. 

At 1 October 2019 
Charged/(credited) to income 
statement 
Charged/(credited) to other 
comprehensive income 

At 30 September 2020 

Accelerated 
capital 
allowances
£ million 
308 

Short-term 
timing 
differences
£ million 
(1) 

Fair value 
(gains)/losses
£ million 
14 

Share-based 
payments
£ million 
(8) 

Post-
employment 
benefit 
obligation 
£ million 
(8) 

Trading loss
£ million 
– 

Total
£ million 
305 

78 

– 
386 

(6) 

– 
(7) 

– 

(57) 
(43) 

5 

1 
(2) 

– 

– 
(8) 

(275) 

– 
(275) 

(198) 

(56) 
51 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

189
189 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

7. Loss per share 
Basic loss per share has been calculated by dividing the total loss for the year by the weighted average number of shares in issue during 
the year after adjusting for shares held in employee benefit trusts. 

On 9 September 2021 the Company invited its shareholders to subscribe to a rights issue of 301,260,394 ordinary shares at an issue price 
of 410 pence per share on the basis of 31 shares for every 47 fully paid ordinary shares held, with such shares issued on 28 September 
2021. As a result of this rights issue in September 2021, the comparative loss per share has been restated having applied the relevant 
bonus factor to the calculator of the weighted average number of shares.  

The rights issue resulted in £1,235 million of gross proceeds. Shares totalling 280.2 million were taken up by existing shareholders (93%) 
with the remaining rump of 21.0 million shares being underwritten.  As at 30 September 2021, there were £91 million of proceeds 
outstanding, which have been subsequently received. 

To calculate diluted loss per share, the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue has been adjusted to assume conversion of 
all dilutive potential shares. Share options granted to employees where the exercise price is less than the average market price of the 
Company’s ordinary shares during the year are considered to be antidilutive potential shares. Where share options are exercisable based 
on performance criteria and those performance criteria have been met during the year, these options are included in the calculation of 
dilutive potential shares. The calculation of diluted earnings per share does not assume conversion, exercise, or other issue of potential 
ordinary shares that would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share. 

Headline basic and diluted loss per share are also presented, based on headline loss for the year. For details on share capital and the 
rights issue in the year, please refer to note 20. 

Loss per share is based on: 

Headline loss for the year 
Total loss for the year 

Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to calculate basic loss per share 
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to calculate diluted loss per share 

Loss per share 
Basic 
Diluted 

Headline loss per share 
Basic 
Diluted 

2021 
£ million 
(900) 
(858) 

2021 
million 
539 
539 

2021 
million 
(159.0) 
(159.0) 

2021 
million 
pence 
(166.9) 
(166.9) 

2020
£ million 
(725) 
(1,079) 

2020
Restated
million 
484 
484 

2020
Restated
million 
(222.9) 
(222.9) 

2020
Restated
million
pence 
(149.7) 
(149.7) 

190 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
190  easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
  
 
 
 
 
8. Segmental and geographical revenue reporting 
Segmental Analysis: 

Revenue  
Operating costs excl fuel 
Fuel 
Ownership costs 

Headline loss before tax 
Non-headline items 

Total loss before tax 

Revenue  
Operating costs excl fuel 
Fuel 
Ownership costs 

Headline loss before tax 
Non-headline items 

Total loss before tax 

Year ended 30 September 2021

Holidays 
£ million 
41 
(50) 
– 
(3) 
(12) 
– 
(12) 

Intergroup 
Transactions
£ million 
(7) 
7 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

Group
£ million  
1,458 
(1,638) 
(371) 
(585) 
(1,136) 
100 
(1,036) 

Year ended 30 September 2020  

Holidays 
£ million 
18 
(45) 
– 
– 

(27) 
3 

(24) 

Intergroup 
Transactions
£ million 
(4) 
4 
– 
– 

– 
– 

– 

Group
£ million  
3,009 
(2,561) 
(721) 
(562) 

(835) 
(438) 

(1,273) 

Airline
£ million 
1,424 
(1,595) 
(371) 
(582) 
(1,124) 
100 
(1,024) 

Airline
£ million 
2,995 
(2,520) 
(721) 
(562) 

(808) 
(441) 

(1,249) 

The intergroup transaction column represents intercompany revenues from Airline to holidays which are recorded at arm’s length and are 
eliminated on consolidation. Individual cost lines are not reported separately as these are not key metrics reported to the Chief Operating 
Decision Maker (CODM). Assets and liabilities are not allocated to individual segments and are not separately reported to or reviewed by 
the CODM, and therefore these have not been disclosed. Interest income and expenditure are not allocated to segments as this activity 
is driven by the central treasury function which manages the cash position of the Group.  

Geographical revenue: 

United Kingdom 
Southern Europe 
Northern Europe 
Other 

2021
£ million 
413 
619 
411 
15 

1,458 

2020
£ million 
1,154 
1,065 
740 
50 

3,009 

Geographical revenue is allocated according to the location of the first departure airport on each booking.  

Southern Europe comprises countries lying wholly or mainly south of the border between Italy and Switzerland, plus France.  

easyJet holidays revenue is generated wholly from the United Kingdom.  

easyJet’s non-current assets comprise its fleet of 183 (2020: 215) owned and 125 (2020: 127) leased aircraft, giving a total fleet of 308 at 
30 September 2021 (2020: 342). In addition to this easyJet was storing 12 aircraft under power by the hour agreements (2020: nil).  
27 aircraft (2020: 29) are registered in Switzerland, 119 (2020: 125) are registered in Austria and the remaining 174 (2020: 188) are 
registered in the United Kingdom.  

9. Dividends 
No dividend was paid in the year ending 30 September 2021. An ordinary dividend of 43.9 pence per share, or £174 million, in respect of 
the year ended 30 September 2019 was paid in the year ended 30 September 2020. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

191
191 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

10. Goodwill and other intangible assets 

Cost 
At 1 October 2020 
Additions 
Disposals 

At 30 September 2021 

Amortisation 
At 1 October 2020 
Charge for the year 
Disposals 

At 30 September 2021 
Net book value 
At 30 September 2021 
At 1 October 2020 

Cost 
At 1 October 2019 
Additions 
Transfer from property, plant and equipment 
Disposals 

At 30 September 2020 
Amortisation 
At 1 October 2019 
Charge for the year 
Disposals 

At 30 September 2020 
Net book value 
At 30 September 2020 
At 1 October 2019 

Other intangible assets

Landing 
rights 
£ million 

Computer 
software 
£ million 

Total
£ million 

Goodwill
£ million 

365 
– 
– 
365 

– 
– 
– 
– 

365 
365 

168 
– 
– 
168 

– 
– 
– 
– 

168 
168 

96 
9 
(5) 
100 

32 
24 
(5) 
51 

49 
64 

264 
9 
(5) 
268 

32 
24 
(5) 
51 

217 
232 

Other intangible assets 

Landing 
rights 
£ million 

Computer 
software 
£ million 

Total
£ million 

Goodwill
£ million 

365 
– 
– 
– 
365 

– 
– 
– 
– 

365 

365 

132 
36 
– 
– 
168 

– 
– 
– 
– 

168 

132 

100 
– 
37 
(41) 
96 

36 
18 
(22) 
32 

64 

64 

232 
36 
37 
(41) 
264 

36 
18 
(22) 
32 

232 

196 

Included within computer software, were are internally generated intangibles of £8 million (2020: £7 million).  

192 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
192 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The recoverable amount of goodwill and other assets with indefinite expected useful lives has been determined based on value in use 
calculations for the airline route network cash generating unit, which holds these assets. 

Pre-tax cash flow projections have been derived from the strategic plan presented to the Board for the period up to 2026, using the 
following key assumptions: 

Pre-tax discount rate (derived from weighted average cost of capital) 
Fuel price (US dollars per metric tonne) 
Long-term economic growth rate 
Exchange rates: 
US dollar 
Euro 
Swiss franc 

2021
11.3% 
696 
2.0% 

1.35 
1.16 
1.26 

2020 
8.5% 
450 
2.0% 

1.29 
1.10 
1.19 

The discount rate has been calculated based on the capital asset pricing model using external inputs where relevant and the current debt 
structure of the Group. The change in discount rate year on year reflects the change in gearing of the group and the change in tax rate. 
Both fuel price and exchange rates are volatile in nature. Exchange rates and fuel price are based on spot rates as at 30 September 
2021. The increase year on year (see in the table above) reflects the change in underlying fuel prices, however in preparing its 
assessment management have assumed that fuel uplifts from a 2019 baseline can be recovered, with any increase in costs being passed 
on to customers. Operating margins are sensitive to significant changes in the timing and ability of increases to be passed through to the 
customer. 

Cash flow projections beyond the forecast period have been extrapolated using an estimated average of long-term economic growth 
rates for the principal countries in which easyJet operates. The future impact of climate change on the business has been incorporated 
into strategic plans, including the estimated financial impact within the base case cash flow projections of the increased cost of carbon-
offsetting, the future estimated price of ETS permits and the expected price and quantity required of Sustainable Aviation Fuel usage. 

The headroom during the year has decreased primarily due to the increase in the pre-tax discount rate. 

Stress testing has been performed on key inputs to the value in use calculation, including the assumptions listed above and the strategic 
plan used as the base for the calculation. The impairment model is sensitive to a sustained significant adverse movement in foreign 
currency exchange rates and forecast operating profits to the extent that no other compensating action is taken. It has been assumed 
that any significant future fuel price increase would be recovered through revenue pass through. Individual scenarios that have been 
deemed reasonably probable do not give rise to an impairment. These scenarios include +/-5% on Euro and USD rates, +100 bps increase 
in weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and a reduced long term growth rate of 1%. 

Current intangible assets 

Carbon offsetting VER 
EU and UK ETS permits 

30 September 
2021
£ million 
15 
125 
140 

30 September 
2020
£ million 
6 
6 
12 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

193
193 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

11. Property, plant and equipment 

Cost 
At 1 October 2020 
Additions 
Transfers 
Aircraft sold and leased back 
Disposals 

At 30 September 2021 
Accumulated depreciation and impairment 
At 1 October 2020 
Charge for the year 
Transfers 
Aircraft sold and leased back 
Disposals 

At 30 September 2021 
Net book value 

At 30 September 2021 
At 1 October 2020 

Cost 
At 1 October 2019 
Additions 
Transfers 
Aircraft sold and leased back 
Disposals 

At 30 September 2020 
Accumulated depreciation and impairment 
At 1 October 2019 
Charge for the year 
Transfers 
Impairment 
Aircraft sold and leased back 
Disposals 

At 30 September 2020 
Net book value 

At 30 September 2020 
At 1 October 2019 

Owned assets 

Right of use assets held under 
leasing arrangements 

Aircraft and 
spares
£ million 

Land and 
Buildings
£ million 

Other
£ million 

Aircraft and 
spares 
£ million 

Other 
£ million 

Total
£ million 

5,520 
112 
64 
(795) 
(99) 

4,802 

1,187 
227 
23 
(120) 
(74) 

1,243 

3,559 
4,333 

44 
– 
– 
– 
– 

44 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

44 
44 

44 
28 
– 
(15) 
(2) 

55 

12 
7 
– 
– 
– 

19 

36 
32 

1,692 
148 
(64) 
559 
– 

2,335 

1,062 
216 
(23) 
– 
– 

1,255 

1,080 
630 

37 
8 
– 
– 
– 

45 

23 
6 
– 
– 
– 

29 

16 
14 

7,337 
296 
– 
(251) 
(101) 

7,281 

2,284 
456 
– 
(120) 
(74) 

2,546 

4,735 
5,053 

Owned assets 

Right of use assets held under 
leasing arrangements 

Aircraft and 
spares
£ million 

Land and 
Buildings
£ million 

Other
£ million 

Aircraft and 
spares 
£ million 

Other 
£ million 

Total
£ million 

5,720 
559 
107 
(851) 
(15) 

5,520 

1,147 
251 
15 
– 
(220) 
(6) 

1,187 

4,333 
4,573 

34 
– 
10 
– 
– 

44 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

44 
34 

76 
100 
(113) 
– 
(19) 

44 

18 
5 
– 
– 
– 
(11) 

12 

32 
58 

1,298 
64 
(41) 
371 
– 

1,692 

818 
222 
(15) 
37 
– 
– 
1,062 

630 
480 

34 
3 
– 
– 
– 

37 

16 
7 
– 
– 
– 
– 
23 

14 
18 

7,162 
726 
(37) 
(480) 
(34) 

7,337 

1,999 
485 
– 
37 
(220) 
(17) 

2,284 

5,053 
5,163 

The net book value of aircraft includes £132 million (2020: £281 million) relating to advance and option payments for future deliveries. 
This amount is not depreciated.   

As at 30 September 2021, easyJet was contractually committed to the acquisition of 101 (2020: 101) Airbus 320 family aircraft, with a 
total estimated list price* of US$ 12.31 billion (2020: US$ 12.16 billion) before escalations and discounts for delivery in financial years 2022 
(8 aircraft), 2023 (7 aircraft) and 2024 (18 aircraft). 

The ‘Other’ categories comprise of leasehold improvements, computer hardware, leasehold property and fixtures, fittings and equipment 
and work in progress in respect of tangible and intangible projects.  

Assets of £934 million are pledged as security for the drawn portion of the UKEF backed facility (2020: £1,066 million pledged as security 
for the Revolving Credit Facility and term loans).  

*   Airbus no longer publishes list prices. The estimated list price is based on the last available list price published in January 2018 and escalated by Airbus’ standard 

escalation from January 2018 to January 2021 of 7.3% (or 2.38% CAGR). 

194 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
194 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12. Other non-current assets 

Lessor maintenance contributions 
Deferred consideration and deposits held by aircraft lessors 

2021
£ million 
75 
60 
135 

2020
£ million 
92 
41 
133 

Lessor maintenance contribution assets arise to compensate easyJet for the delivery of a mid-life aircraft, where a lessor has agreed to 
make a contribution to easyJet’s maintenance costs to reflect the cycles already flown by the aircraft at the point it is delivered to 
easyJet. Depending on the contract terms, payment will be made either at the maintenance event date or at the lease return date.  
This has not been considered for impairment as the leased aircraft held by easyJet exceeds the value of the contribution due. 

13. Trade and other receivables 

Trade receivables 
Less provision for loss allowance 

Prepayments 
Accrued income  
Recoverable supplemental rent (pledged as collateral) 
Other receivables 

2021
£ million 
45 
(1) 
44 

2020
£ million 
22 
(4) 
18 

93 
5 
 -  
149 
291 

84 
1 
10 
80 
193 

Within the provision for loss allowance, £4 million (2020: £4 million) has been charged to the income statement, with £1 million  
(2020: £1 million) being utilised in the 2021 financial year.  

Within other receivables, an amount of £91 million is due from the rights issue funding (2020: £nil).  

Information about the impairment of trade receivables and the Group’s exposure to credit risk can be found in note 25.. 

14. Cash and money market deposits 

Cash and cash equivalents (original maturity less than three months) 
Money market deposits (original maturity more than three months) 
Current restricted cash 
Non-current restricted cash 

Carrying value is not significantly different from fair value. 

Restricted cash comprises: 

Amount held in escrow accounts for legal cases 
ATOL Licence non-pooled account  
Cash held as bank guarantee collateral 

2021
£ million
3,536 
– 
13 
1 
3,550 

2020
£ million 
2,284 
32 
14 
5 
2,335 

2021
£ million 
4  
9  
1  
14  

2020
£ million 
5  
14  
– 
19  

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

195
195 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

15. Trade and other payables 

Trade payables 
Accruals 
Taxes and social security 
Other payables 

Combined 

Opening contract liabilities 
Revenue deferred during the year 
Revenue recognised during the year 
Additional contract liability during the year 
Reduction in contract liability during the year 
Foreign exchange impact during the year 

Closing contract liabilities 

2021 
£ million 
217 
556 
25 
330 
1,128 

Unearned 
£ million 
1,094 
2,430 
(2,910) 
– 
– 
– 
614 

2020
£ million 
323 
379 
33 
507 
1,242 

2020 
Other
£ million 
8 
– 
– 
1,271 
(898) 
16 
397 

Unearned
£ million 
614 
1,639 
(1,409) 
– 
– 
– 
844 

2021 
Other 
£ million 
397 
– 
– 
361 
(475) 
(6) 
277 

Other contract liabilities consist of amounts transferred from unearned revenue to other payables due to the cancellation of flights. This 
liability includes customer vouchers outstanding and amounts where customers have not yet requested a refund, voucher or flight transfer.  

16. Borrowings 

At 30 September 2021 
Eurobonds 
Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) 
Commercial Paper (UK Export Finance) 

At 30 September 2020 
Eurobonds 
Drawn down amounts on Revolving Credit Facility 
Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) 
Bank loans 

Current 
£ million 

Non-current 
£ million 

Total
£ million 

– 
300 
– 
300 

2,303 
– 
764 
3,067 

2,303 
300 
764 
3,367 

Current 
£ million 

Non-current 
£ million 

Total
£ million 

– 
387 
600 
– 
987 

1,356 
– 
– 
388 
1,744 

1,356 
387 
600 
388 
2,731 

Amounts above are shown net of issue costs or discounted amounts which are amortised at the effective interest rate over the life of 
the debt instruments.  

On 7 January 2016, the UK Listing Authority approved a prospectus relating to the establishment of a £3,000 million Euro Medium Term 
Note Programme of easyJet plc. Under this programme, on 9 February 2016 easyJet plc issued notes amounting to €500 million for a 
seven-year term with a fixed annual coupon rate of 1.750%. On 18 October 2016 easyJet plc issued additional notes amounting to 
€500 million for a seven-year term with a fixed annual coupon rate of 1.125%. On 11 June 2019 easyJet plc issued additional notes 
amounting to €500 million for a six-year term with a fixed annual coupon rate of 0.875%.  

The three €500 million Eurobonds issued on 9 February 2016, 18 October 2016 and 11 June 2019 are discussed within note 25.  

On 10 February 2015 easyJet signed a $500 million Revolving Credit Facility which was due to mature in February 2022. On 9 April 2020 
easyJet fully drew down this $500 million Revolving Credit Facility, secured against aircraft assets. This was repaid in January 2021. 

On 6 April 2020 easyJet issued a £600 million Commercial Paper through the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF). This is an 
unsecured, short-term paper issued at a discount, of which £300 million was repaid in March 2021 and the remaining £300 million was 
repaid in November 2021. On 16 April 2020 easyJet secured two term loans with separate counterparty banks for £200 million and 
$245 million respectively. Both loans were secured against aircraft assets and were due to mature in February 2022, but have since been 
repaid as set out below.  

In January 2021 easyJet entered into a new five-year term loan facility of $1.87 billion underwritten by a syndicate of banks and supported 
by a partial guarantee from UK Export Finance under their Export Development Guarantee scheme. easyJet drew down $1.05 billion from 
the UKEF backed facility in January, utilising these funds to repay and cancel the fully drawn $500 million Revolving Credit Facility and 
repaying term loans of $245 million and £200 million. 

easyJet issued a €1.2 billion seven year bond with an annual coupon of 1.875% in March 2021, under its Euro Medium Term Note (EMTN) 
Programme. The bond was issued out of easyJet FinCo B.V registered in the Netherlands and was guaranteed by easyJet Airline 
Company Limited (EACL) and easyJet plc. 

On 9 September 2021 easyJet signed a $400 million Revolving Credit Facility with a minimum four-year term, which was undrawn as at 
30 September 2021.  

196 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
196 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17. Leases 
easyJet holds aircraft under leasing arrangements that are recognised as right of use assets and lease liabilities, with remaining lease 
terms ranging up to 10 years. easyJet is contractually obliged to carry out maintenance on these aircraft, and the cost of this is provided 
based on the number of flying hours and cycles operated. Further details are given in note 1.  

Information in respect of right of use assets, including the carrying amount, additions and depreciation, are set out in note 11 to these 
financial statements. Information in respect of the carrying value and interest arising on lease liabilities is set out in note 24 and note 2 
respectively. A maturity analysis of lease liabilities is set out below.  

easyJet also enters into short-term leases and low-value leases which are not recognised as right of use assets and lease liabilities. 
The expense recognised in the period in relation to these leases is disclosed below. 

Amounts recognised in the statement of cash flows 
Capital payments 
Interest payments 

Lease liabilities 
Maturity analysis - contractual undiscounted cash flows 
Less than one year 
One to five years 
More than five years 

Lease liabilities included in the statement of financial position 
Current 
Non-current 
Total 

Amounts recognised in income statement 
Interest on lease liabilities  
Expenses relating to low-value leases  
Expenses relating to short-term wet leases 

Year ending 
30 September 
2021
£ million 
(261) 
(41) 

Year ending 
30 September 
2020
£ million 
(230) 
(20) 

30 September 
2021
£ million 

30 September 
2020
£ million 

(251) 
(730) 
(316) 
(1,297) 

(238) 
(382) 
(160) 
(780) 

30 September 
2021
£ million 
(189) 
(890) 
(1,079) 

30 September 
2020
£ million 
(224) 
(486) 
(710) 

Year ending 
30 September 
2021
£ million 
42 
5 
(14) 
33 

Year ending 
30 September 
2020
£ million 
24 
6 
17 
47 

The £14 million credit recognised as Expenses relating to short term wet leases relates to the release of an accrual recognised in financial 
year 2020 which was no longer required. 

18. Provisions for liabilities and charges 

At 1 October 2020 
Exchange adjustments 
Credited to income statement 
Charged income statement 
Related to aircraft sold and leased back 
Unwinding of discount 
Utilised 

At 30 September 2021 

Maintenance 
provisions
£ million 
597 
(23) 
 (20) 
71 
132 
(20) 
(187) 

Provisions for 
customer 
claims
£ million 
39 
 -  
(14) 
4 
 -  
 -  
(8) 

Restructuring 
£ million  
101 
(3) 
(65) 
– 
– 
– 
(15) 

Other 
provisions
£ million 
2 
– 
– 
12 
– 
– 
– 

Total 
provisions
£ million 
739 
(26) 
(99) 
87 
132 
(20) 
(210) 

550 

21 

18 

14 

603 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

197
197 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

18. Provisions for liabilities and charges continued 

Maintenance provisions comprise of maintenance costs arisen from legal and constructive obligations relating to the condition of the 
aircraft when returned to the lessor. Provisions for customer claims comprise amounts payable to customers who make claims in respect 
of flight delays and cancellations, and refunds of air passenger duty or similar charges. Restructuring and other provisions include 
amounts in respect of potential liabilities for employee-related matters and litigation which arose in the normal course of business.  

Current 
Non-current 

2021 
£ million 
183 
420 
603 

2020
£ million 
407 
332 
739 

The split of the current/non-current maintenance provision is based on the current expected maintenance event timings. If actual aircraft 
usage varies from expectation the timing of the utilisation of the maintenance provision could result in a material change in the 
classification between current and non-current.  

Maintenance provisions are expected to be utilised within 12 years. Provisions for customer claims, restructuring, and other provisions 
could be fully utilised within one year from 30 September 2021 and therefore are classified as current. 

19. Pensions  
Due to the minimum guarantees in place under Swiss law, the Swiss pension plan meets IAS 19 requirements to be treated as a defined 
benefit plan under IAS 19 despite the scheme having many attributes akin to a defined contribution scheme. The Swiss Federal Council 
requires that a guaranteed minimum interest rate must be achieved (currently 1%), plus a guaranteed minimum conversion rate to be 
applied to accumulated pension on retirement (currently 6.8%). These guarantees mean that the scheme is accounted for as a defined 
benefit scheme under IAS 19. The scheme remains open to new employees. 

The easyJet portion of the current service costs and the net interest cost are charged to the consolidated income statement in the year 
in which they relate. Net interest is determined by multiplying the net defined benefit liability by the discount rate at the start of the 
annual reporting period, adjusted for any contributions and benefit payments in the period. Actuarial gains and losses are recognised in 
the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and the consolidated balance reflects the net surplus or deficit at the statement 
of financial position date.  

The defined benefit obligation is calculated using the projected unit credit method. This reflects service rendered by employees to the 
dates of valuation and incorporates actuarial assumptions including discount rates used in determining the present value of benefits, 
projected rates of remuneration growth and mortality rates. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by 
discounting the estimated future cash outflows using yields of high-quality corporate bonds. Management base the discount rate on the 
bond yield on the Swiss bond market over 15 to 20 years, reflecting the currency in which the benefits will be paid, and maturity terms 
approximating to the terms of the related pension obligation.  

The key financial assumptions used to calculate the Swiss scheme liabilities under IAS 19 as at 30 September were: 

Discount rate 
Salary increase 
Demographic assumptions 

Demographic assumptions 

2021 
0.35% 
1.00% 
BVG 2020 GT 

2020 
0.15% 
1.00% 
BVG 2015 GT 

The demographic assumptions including mortality assumptions used for the liability calculation are based on the most recent BVG 2020 
tables (2020: BVG 2015 tables). These tables are based on the experience during the period 2015 to 2019 on 15 of the largest 
autonomous Swiss pension plans and are considered to be the best estimate available to management.  

Sensitivities 
The scheme asset values are sensitive to market conditions. The scheme liabilities are sensitive to actuarial assumptions used to 
determine the scheme obligations. Significant changes in these assumptions could potentially have a material impact in the consolidated 
statement of financial position. The main assumptions are the discount rate, the rate of salary increase and the life expectancy rate. The 
following table provides an estimate of the potential impact on the pension scheme of changing these assumptions:: 

Increase / (decrease) in 
defined benefit obligation 
2020 
(7.3%) 
8.5% 
1.1% 
(1.0%) 
0.6% 
(0.7%) 

2021 
(6.6%) 
+7.6% 
+1.0% 
(0.9%) 
0.5% 
(0.6%) 

+0.5% 
-0.5% 
+0.5% 
-0.5% 
+ 1 year 
- 1 year 

Discount rate 

Salary increase 

Life expectancy 

198 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
198 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
easyJet has an affiliation contract with Swiss Life Collective BVG Foundation. The assets of all affiliated companies are pooled which 
diversifies the associated risk and the scheme assets represent the share in this Foundation. The Collective controls the asset 
management, is exposed to the risk and guarantees the savings capitals under the contract in place. The Board of Trustees with the 
elected employees’ and employers’ representatives decide the investment strategy. The current agreement is fully insured by Swiss Life, 
which means that all underfunding, investment and longevity risks are transferred from easyJet to Swiss Life over the term of the policy 
i.e. over the term of the policy when members retire, all payments are the liability of the pension scheme. 

The amounts recognised in the consolidated income statement are as follows: 

Current service costs defined benefit 
Interest cost on net defined benefit obligation 
Interest income on defined benefit asset 
Past service costs 
Plan curtailment gain* 

Net defined benefit cost recognised in the income statement 

* The curtailment was recognised as a result of restructuring and was presented as a non-headline item in the income statement. 

Amounts recognised in other comprehensive income/(loss): 

Actuarial gain 
Return on plan assets  

Recognised in the statement of other comprehensive income 

Movement in net deficit in the year: 

Net deficit of the plan at 1 October 
Net defined benefit cost recognised in the income statement  
Net defined benefit gain recognised in other comprehensive income/(loss) 
Company contributions 
Foreign exchange 

Statement of financial position net deficit as at 30 September  

2021
£ million 
8 
– 
– 
(1) 
– 
7 

2021
£ million 
(3) 
(2) 
(5) 

2021
£ million 
45 
7 
(5) 
(7) 
(3) 
37 

2020
£ million 
9 
1 
(1) 
– 
(3) 
6 

2020
£ million 
(2) 
(1) 
(3) 

2020
£ million 
47 
6 
(3) 
(7) 
2 
45 

The prepayment represents cash paid over to Swiss Life in advance and not yet utilised in the pension scheme; this amount is consistent 
year on year. 

Expected employer cash contribution from the Company in the 2022 financial year is expected to be CHF 8 million (2020: CHF 8 million). 

Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation are as follows: 

Present value of obligation at 1 October 
Current service cost 
Member contributions  
Interest costs on defined benefit obligation 
Contributions paid by plan participants 
Benefit payments from scheme assets 
Past service cost 
Plan curtailment 
Plan settlement 
Actuarial gain arising from financial adjustments 
Actuarial gain arising from experience adjustments 
Foreign exchange 

Present value of obligation at 30 September 

2021
£ million 
153 
8 
4 
– 
4 
(4) 
(1) 
– 
– 
– 
(3) 
(9) 
152 

2020
£ million 
147 
9 
4 
1 
2 
(5) 
– 
(3) 
(5) 
(2) 
– 
5 
153 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

199
199 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

19. Pensions continued 

Changes in the fair value of the scheme assets are as follows: 

Fair value of the scheme asset as at 1 October 
Interest income on the defined benefit plan assets 
Contributions paid by Company 
Contributions paid by employees 
Contributions paid by plan participants 
Benefits paid from plan assets  
Return on plan assets  
Plan settlement 
Foreign exchange 

Fair value of the pension assets as at 30 September 

Number of active participants 
Average age of active insured members in years 
Average time remaining before active employees reach final age in years 
Average active life expectancy in years 
Average years of service in years 

2021 
£ million 
108 
– 
7 
4 
4 
(4) 
2 
– 
(6) 
115 

2021 
£ million 
987 
40 
9 
53 
9 

2020
£ million 
100 
1 
7 
4 
2 
(5) 
1 
(5) 
3 
108 

2020
£ million 
1,043 
39 
10 
54 
8 

The weighted average duration of the defined benefit obligation of the Swiss pension scheme is 15 years (2020: 16 years). 

The assets held do not have a quoted market price as are within the affiliation contract with Swiss Life Collective BVG Foundation. 

Maturity profile of defined benefit obligation 
Expected benefit payments during fiscal year ending 30 September: 

1 year 
2 years 
3 years 
4 years 
5 years 
6 up to 10 years 

20. Share capital 

Authorised 
At 30 September 
Ordinary shares of 27 2/7 pence each * 

Allotted, called up and fully paid 
At 30 September  

2021 
£ million 
8 
11 
11 
11 
13 
53 

2020
£ million 
7 
8 
9 
7 
9 
38 

2021
million 

Number 
2020 
£ million 

Nominal value 
2020
£ million 

2021 
million 

– 

758 

458  

457 

– 

207 

125  

125 

*  At the AGM held on 23 December 2020, the shareholders of the Company approved the amendments to the Articles of Association which included removal of 

Authorised Share Capital to bring the share capital authorities in line with the market practice and to provide flexibility to allot more shares. 

200 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
200  easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
On 9 September 2021 the Company invited its shareholders to subscribe to a rights issue of 301,260,394 ordinary shares at an 
issue price of 410 pence per share on the basis of 31 shares for every 47 fully paid ordinary shares held, with such shares issued on  
28 September 2021.  

The rights issue resulted in £1,235 million of gross proceeds. Shares totalling 280.2 million were taken up by existing shareholders (93%) 
with the remaining rump of 21.0m shares being underwritten.  As at 30 September 2021, there were £91 million of proceeds outstanding, 
which have been subsequently received. 

In June 2020, easyJet successfully raised net proceeds of £409 million through an equity placing of new shares. 

easyJet’s employee benefit trusts hold the following shares. The cost of these has been deducted from retained earnings: 

Number of shares (million) 
Cost (£ million) 
Market value at year end (£ million) 

2021
2 
18 
11 

2020 
2 
27 
11 

21. Share incentive schemes 
easyJet operates the following share incentive schemes, all of which are equity settled. The change in the number of awards outstanding 
and weighted average exercise prices during the year, and the number exercisable at each year end were as follows: 

Grant date 

Long Term Incentive Plan 
19 December 2016 
19 December 2017 
19 December 2018 
19 December 2019 
29 December 2020 
Restricted Stock Unit 
29 December 2020 - 2 year 
29 December 2020 - 3 year 
Restricted Share Plan 
19 December 2016 
Save As You Earn scheme 
1 July 2017 
1 July 2018 
1 July 2019 
1 August 2020 
1 August 2021 
Share Incentive Plans 

Long Term Incentive Plan 

1 October 
2020
million 

Granted
million 

Rights issue
million 

Forfeited 
million 

Exercised
million 

30 September 
2021
million 

0.1  
0.5 
1.1  
0.8  
– 

– 
– 

0.1  

0.7  
0.2  
2.2  
4.9  
– 
4.8  
15.4  

– 
– 
– 
– 
0.5  

0.3  
0.8  

– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
2.9  
– 
4.5  

– 
– 
0.2  
0.1  
0.1  

– 
0.1  

– 

– 
– 
0.3  
0.8  
0.5  
0.6  
2.7  

(0.1) 
(0.5) 
(0.3) 
(0.3) 
– 

– 
– 

– 

(0.7) 
(0.1) 
(0.6) 
(0.4) 
– 
(0.4) 
(3.4) 

– 
– 
(0.1) 
– 
– 

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
(0.6) 
(0.7) 

– 
– 
0.9  
0.6  
0.6  

0.3  
0.9  

0.1  

– 
0.1  
1.9  
5.3  
3.4  
4.4  
18.5  

The plan is open, by invitation, to Executive Directors and senior management, and provides for annual awards of Performance Shares 
worth up to 250% of salary each year. The vesting of these shares is dependent on return on capital employed (ROCE), earnings per 
share (EPS) and/or total shareholder return (TSR) targets compared to FTSE-ranked companies at the start of the performance period. 
All awards have a three-year vesting period. 2021 awards are assessed on performance conditions measured over the three financial 
years ended 30 September 2023. 

Restricted Stock Unit 

The plan is given to Executive Directors, and both senior and middle management, which provides for annual awards of Performance 
Shares worth up to 75% of salary each year. All awards have a two or three year vesting period of which the vesting conditions are 
continued employment.  

Save As You Earn scheme 

The scheme is open to all employees on the UK payroll. Participants may elect to save up to £500 per month under a three-year savings 
contract. An option is granted by the Company to buy shares at a discount of 20% from market price at the time of the grant. At the 
end of the savings period, the option becomes exercisable for a period of six months. Employees who are not paid through the UK 
payroll may participate in the scheme under similar terms and conditions, albeit without the same tax benefits.  

www.easyJet.com
201
www.easyJet.com  201 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

21. Share incentive schemes continued 

Share Incentive Plan 

The plan is open to all employees on the UK payroll. Participants may invest up to £1,800 of their pre-tax salary each year to purchase 
Partnership Shares in easyJet. For each Partnership Share acquired, easyJet purchases a matching share up to a maximum value of 
£1,500 per annum. Employees must remain with easyJet for three years from the date of purchase of each Partnership Share in order to 
qualify for the Matching Share, and for five years for the shares to be transferred to them tax free. The employee is entitled to dividends 
on shares purchased, and to vote at shareholder meetings. With effect from 1 April 2020, easyJet ceased contributing a Matching Share 
to the scheme as a result of the cash constraints on the business. 

Subject to Company performance, easyJet also issues free shares to UK employees under an approved share incentive plan of up to 
£3,000 per annum in value. There is a similar unapproved free shares scheme for international employees.  

The fair value of grants under the Save As You Earn scheme are calculated by applying the Binomial Lattice option pricing model. The 
fair value of grants under the TSR based Long Term Incentive Plan is estimated under the Stochastic model (also known as the Monte 
Carlo model). The fair value of grants under all other schemes is the share price on the date of grant. The following assumptions are 
used: 

easyJet undertook a Rights Issue in the year which had a dilutive effect on the share price. To compensate for the dilution in value, the 
number of options in each scheme was increased. At the date of modification, the Rights Issue was non beneficial to individuals as the 
option number increased by the same factor the share price decreased and therefore there are no incremental changes to the fair 
values. 

Exercise
Price
£ 

Expected 
volatility
% 

Option 
Life 
years 

Risk-free 
interest rate 
% 

Grant date 
Long Term Incentive Plan 
19 December 2016 - ROCE 
19 December 2016 - TSR 
19 December 2017 - ROCE 
19 December 2017 - EPS 
19 December 2017 - TSR 
19 December 2018 - EPS 
19 December 2018 - TSR 
19 December 2019 - EPS 
19 December 2019 - TSR 
29 December 2020 - TSR 
Restricted Stock Unit 
29 December 2020 - RSU 
Restricted Share Plan 
29 December 2016 
Save As You Earn scheme 
1 July 2017 
1 July 2018 
1 July 2019 
1 August 2020 
1 August 2021 

Share
Price
£ 

10.43 
10.43 
13.77 
13.77 
13.77 
10.78 
10.78 
14.29 
14.29 
8.63 

8.60 

10.43 

12.11 
17.43 
10.03 
6.65 
9.53 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

– 

9.7 
13.9 
8.0 
6.7 
7.6 

– 
35% 
– 
– 
34% 
– 
47% 
– 
53% 
61% 

– 

– 

31% 
30% 
33% 
49% 
59% 

Fair
Value
£ 

10.43 
5.21 
13.77 
13.77 
6.89 
10.78 
5.39 
14.29 
7.15 
4.32 

8.60 

– 
3.0 
– 
– 
3.0 
– 
3.0 
– 
3.0 
3.0 

– 

 – 
1% 
 – 
 – 
1% 
 – 
1% 
 – 
1% 
– 

 – 

– 

                 – 

10.43 

3.5 
3.5 
3.5 
3.5 
3.5 

– 
1% 
1% 
– 
1% 

2.84 
4.41 
2.70 
1.95 
3.96 

Share price for LTIPs is the closing share price from the last working day prior to the date of grant.  

Exercise price for the Save As You Earn scheme is set at a 20% (2020: 0%) discount from the share price at grant date.  

Expected volatility is based on historical volatility over a period comparable to the expected life of each type of option.  

Levels of early exercises and forfeitures are estimated using historical averages unless this is deemed unreasonable, in which case 
judgement is used.  

The weighted average fair value of Matching Shares granted under the Share Incentive Plan during the year was £nil (2020: £12.51).  

For grants under the Save As You Earn scheme, the dividend yield assumption is calculated based on the actual yield at the date of 
grant. For the options granted in 2021, the dividend yield assumption was 3% (2020: 2.5%, 2019: 4.5%, 2018: 3.2%, 2017: 4.2%). 

The total share-based payment expense recognised for the year was £16 million (2020: £18 million). The share-based payment liability as 
at 30 September 2021 was £45 million (2020: £42 million). 

202 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
202  easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
    
 
 
22. Reconciliation of operating loss to cash used in operations 

Operating loss 

Adjustments for non-cash items: 
Depreciation  
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangibles 
Gain on sale and leaseback 
Amortisation of intangible assets 
Share-based payments 
Impairment 

Changes in working capital and other items of an operating nature: 
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables 
(Increase)/decrease in current intangible assets 
(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables 
Increase/(decrease) in unearned revenue 
Post-employment benefit contributions 
(Decrease)/increase in provisions 
Decrease in other non-current assets 
Increase/(decrease) in derivative financial instruments 
Decrease in non-current deferred income 

2021
£ million 
(910) 

2020
£ million 
(899) 

456 
30 
(65) 
24 
16 
– 

(8) 
(74) 
(187) 
232 
(7) 
(294) 
24 
9 
(1)

485 
30 
(38) 
18 
17 
37 

101 
46 
173 
(455) 
– 
150 
9 
(215) 
(1) 

Cash used in operations 

(755) 

(542) 

23. Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net debt 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Money market deposits 

Eurobond 
Drawn down amounts on Revolving Credit Facility 
Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) 
Bank loans 
Lease liabilities 

Net debt 

1 October 
2020
£ million 
2,284 
32 

Fair value and 
foreign 
exchange
£ million 
(73) 
– 

New debt 
raised in the 
year
£ million 
– 
– 

Other loan 
issue costs 
£ million 
– 
– 

Net
cash flow
£ million 
1,325 
(32) 

30 September 
2021
£ million 
3,536 
– 

2,316 

(73) 

– 

– 

1,293 

3,536 

(1,356) 
(387) 
(600) 
(388) 
(710) 
(3,441) 

(1,125) 

24 
– 
– 
76 
63 
163 

90 

(971) 
– 
– 
(833) 
(693) 
(2,497) 

(2,497) 

– 
– 
23 
– 
23 

23 

– 
387 
300 
358 
261 
1,306 

(2,303) 
– 
(300) 
(764) 
(1,079) 
(4,446) 

2,599 

(910) 

www.easyJet.com
203
www.easyJet.com  203 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

24. Financial instruments 
The fair values of financial assets and liabilities, together with the carrying value at each reporting date, are as follows: 

At 30 September 2021 

Other non-current assets 
Trade and other 
receivables 
Trade and other payables 
Derivative financial 
instruments 
Restricted cash 
Cash and cash 
equivalents 
Eurobonds (2) 
Other Borrowings (2) 
Lease liabilities 
Equity investments (3) 

At 30 September 2020 

Other non-current assets 
Trade and other 
receivables 
Trade and other payables 
Derivative financial 
instruments 
Restricted cash 
Money market deposits 
Cash and cash 
equivalents 
Eurobonds (2) 
Other Borrowings (2) 
Lease liabilities 
Equity investments (3) 

Amortised cost 

Financial 
assets 
£ million 

Financial 
liabilities 
£ million 

Fair value 
hedge
£ million 

Held at fair value 
Other 
financial 
instruments
£ million 

Cash flow 
hedge
£ million 

135 

178 
– 

– 
14 

1,932 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

– 
(826) 

– 
– 

– 
(2,303) 
(1,064) 
(1,079) 
– 

– 

– 
– 

53 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

– 
– 

153 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

– 
– 

(3) 
– 

1,604 
– 
– 
– 
30 

Other (1) 
£ million 

Carrying 
Value 
£ million 

Fair
Value
£ million 

– 

135 

135 

113 
(302) 

– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

291 
(1,128) 

203 
14 

3,536 
(2,303) 
(1,064) 
(1,079) 
30 

291 
(1,128) 

203 
14 

3,536 
(2,380) 
(1,064) 
N/A 
30 

Amortised cost 
Financial 
liabilities 
£ million 

Financial 
assets 
£ million 

Fair value 
hedge
£ million 

Held at fair value 
Other financial 
instruments
£ million 

Cash flow 
hedge
£ million 

Other (1) 
£ million 

Carrying 
Value 
£ million 

Fair
Value
£ million 

133 

53 
– 

– 
19 
32 

1,467 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

– 
(837) 

– 
– 
– 

– 
(1,356) 
(1,375) 
(710) 
– 

– 

– 
– 

82 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

– 
– 

(310) 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

– 
– 

(99) 
– 
– 

817 
– 
– 
– 
33 

– 

133 

133 

140 
(405) 

– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

193 
(1,242) 

(327) 
19 
32 

2,284 
(1,356) 
(1,375) 
(710) 
33 

193 
(1,242) 

(327) 
19 
32 

2,284 
(1,173) 
(1,375) 
N/A 
33 

Information presented for the current year ended 30 September 2021 and comparative year ended 30 September 2020, is presented in 
accordance with IFRS 9. 

1.  Amounts disclosed in the 'Other' column are items that do not meet the definition of a financial instrument. They are disclosed to facilitate reconciliation of the 

carrying values of financial instruments to line items presented in the statement of financial position. 

2.  For further information see Capital, financing and interest risk management section in note 25. 
3.  The equity investment of £30 million (2020: £33 million) represents a 13.2% shareholding in a non

listed entity, The Airline Group Limited. Valuation movements are 

designated as being fair valued through other comprehensive income due to the nature of the investment being held for strategic purposes. No dividend was 
received during the year (2020: £2 million). 

‐

Fair value calculation methodology  

Where available the fair values of financial instruments have been determined by reference to observable market prices where the 
instruments are traded. Where market prices are not available, the fair value has been estimated by discounting expected future cash 
flows at prevailing interest rates and by applying year end exchange rates (excluding The Airline Group Limited equity investment). 

The fair values of the four Eurobonds are classified as level 1 of the IFRS 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ fair value hierarchy (valuations taken 
as the closing market trade price for each respective Eurobond as on 30 September 2021). Apart from the equity investment, the 
remaining financial instruments for which fair value is disclosed in the table above, and derivative financial instruments, are classified as 
level 2. 

The fair values of derivatives are calculated using observable market forward curves (e.g. forward foreign exchange rates, forward 
interest rates or forward jet fuel prices) and discounted to present value using risk free rates. The impacts of counterparty credit, cross-
currency basis and market volatility are also included where appropriate as part of the fair valuation. 

204 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
204  easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The equity investment is classified as level 3 due to the use of forecast dividends which are discounted to present value. Though there 
are other level 2 inputs to the valuation, the discounted cash flow is a significant input which is not based on observable market data. 
The fair value is assessed at each reporting date based on the discounted cash flows and two other valuations calculated using a market 
approach and level 2 inputs. The fair value of £30 million was determined on this basis by an external valuation firm as at 30 September 
2021 (2020: £33 million), representing a reduction of £3 million from the prior year which was recognised in other comprehensive income. 
If the level 3 forecast cash flows were 10% higher or lower the fair value would not increase/decrease by a significant amount. 

The fair value measurement hierarchy levels have been defined as follows: 

•  Level 1, fair value of financial instruments based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. 
•  Level 2, fair value of financial instruments in an active market (for example, over the counter derivatives) which are determined using valuation 

techniques which maximise the use of observable market data and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. 

•  Level 3, fair value of financial instruments that are not based on observable market data (i.e. unobservable inputs).  

Fair value of derivative financial instruments 

At 30 September 2021 
Designated as cash flow hedges 
US dollar 
Euro 
Swiss franc 
Jet fuel 
Cross-currency interest rate swaps 

Designated as fair value hedges 
Cross-currency interest rate swaps 

Designated as fair value through profit or loss 
US dollar 
Euro 

At 30 September 2020 
Designated as cash flow hedges 
US dollar 
Euro 
Swiss franc 
South African rand 
Jet fuel 
Cross-currency interest rate swaps 

Designated as fair value hedges 
Cross-currency interest rate swaps 

Designated as fair value through profit or loss 
US dollar 
Euro 
Swiss francs 
Jet 

Quantity
 million 

Non-current
assets
£ million 

Current
assets
£ million 

Current 
liabilities 
£ million 

Non-current
liabilities
£ million 

Total
£ million 

804 
442 
56 
1 
888 

379 

762 
79 

1 
– 
– 
25 
– 

53 

7 
– 
86 

7 
3 
1 
172 
– 

(10) 
(12) 
– 
– 
– 

(1) 
– 
– 
– 
(33) 

(3) 
(9) 
1 
197 
(33) 

– 

– 

– 

53 

2 
– 
185 

(8) 
(1) 
(31) 

(3) 
– 
(37) 

(2) 
(1) 
203 

Quantity
 million 

Non-current
assets
£ million 

Current
assets
£ million 

Current 
liabilities 
£ million 

Non-current
liabilities
£ million 

Total
£ million 

376 
668 
188 
26 
2 
888 

379 

600 
432 
197 
1 

1 
1 
– 
– 
1 
3 

82 

1 
– 
– 
– 
89 

2 
5 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

1 
11 
– 
2 
21 

(2) 
(6) 
(4) 
– 
(228) 
– 

(2) 
(7) 
(2) 
– 
(71) 
– 

(1) 
(7) 
(6) 
– 
(298) 
3 

– 

– 

82 

(8) 
(3) 
(4) 
(97) 
(352) 

(3) 
– 
– 
– 
(85) 

(9) 
8 
(4) 
(95) 
(327) 

For foreign currency forward contracts, quantity represents the absolute gross nominal value of currency contracts held, disclosed in the 
contract foreign currency. The cross-currency interest rate swap contracts are presented at the Sterling notional amount. For jet fuel 
derivative contracts quantity represents absolute contracted metric tonnes.  

The majority of foreign exchange and jet fuel transactions designated as a cash flow hedge are expected to occur on various dates 
within the next 18 months. Accumulated gains and losses resulting from these transactions are deferred in the hedging reserve. They will 
be recognised in the income statement in the periods that the hedged transactions impact the income statement. Where the gain or 
loss is included in the initial amount recognised following the purchase of an aircraft, recognition in the income statement is over a period 
of up to 23 years in the form of depreciation of the purchased asset. 

www.easyJet.com
205
www.easyJet.com  205 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

24. Financial instruments continued 
Amounts related to USD and EUR foreign exchange derivatives held at fair value through profit and loss (e.g. not held in a hedge 
accounting relationship) form part of the Group’s statement of financial position retranslation risk management strategy.  

Fair valuation movements on these derivatives are recognised in the income statement and offset foreign exchange movements on the 
corresponding notional amount of the statement of financial position monetary liabilities held in USD and EUR. These trades are all 
expected to occur on various dates within the next 36 months. Interest rate swap contracts are designated and qualify as either fair 
value or cash flow hedges to minimise volatility in the income statement. 

As at 30 September 2021 there were no active US dollar, Euro, Swiss franc or Jet derivatives discontinued from a hedge accounting 
relationship. 

The Group maintains cross-currency interest rate swap contracts on a proportion of fixed rate debt issuance as part of the approach to 
currency and interest rate risk management. The cross-currency interest rate swap contracts are designated and qualify as either fair 
value or cash flow hedges to minimise volatility in the income statement. 

The following derivative financial instruments are subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting agreements: 

At 30 September 2021 
Derivative financial instruments 
Assets 
Liabilities 

At 30 September 2020 
Derivative financial instruments 
Assets 
Liabilities 

Gross 
Amount 
£ million 

Amount 
not set off 
£ million 

Net
amount
£ million 

271 
(68) 
203 

(52) 
52 
– 

219 
(16) 
203 

Gross 
Amount 
£ million 

Amount 
not set off 
£ million 

Net
amount
£ million 

110 
(437) 
(327) 

(71) 
71 
– 

39 
(366) 
(327) 

All financial assets and liabilities are presented gross on the face of the statement of financial position as the conditions for netting 
specified in IAS 32 'Financial Instruments: Presentation' are not met. 

25. Financial risk and capital management 
easyJet is exposed to financial risks including fluctuations in exchange rates, jet fuel prices and interest rates. Financial risk management 
aims to limit these market risks with selected derivative hedging instruments being used for this purpose. easyJet's policy is not to 
speculatively trade derivatives but use the instruments to hedge anticipated exposure and gain cash flow certainty. easyJet reduces its 
exposure to market risk by using derivatives as any gains and losses arising are offset by the outcome of the underlying exposure being 
hedged.  

The Board is responsible for setting financial risk and capital management policies and objectives which are implemented by the treasury 
function on a day to day basis. The policy outlines the approach to risk management and also states the instruments and time periods 
which the treasury function is authorised to use in managing financial risks. The policy is regularly reviewed to ensure best practice.  

easyJet’s normal rolling foreign exchange and commodity hedging policies have been reduced in order to mitigate the potential for 
further over hedging. Throughout the year easyJet has continued to hedge a proportion of its future lease liability payments using USD 
foreign exchange derivatives. 

Capital employed comprises shareholders' equity, borrowings (including amounts related to IFRS 16 lease liability), cash and money 
market deposits (excluding restricted cash). 

Consequently, the capital employed at the end of the current and prior year and the return earned during those years were as follows:  

Shareholders' equity 
Borrowings 
Lease liabilities 
Cash and money market deposits (excluding  
restricted cash) 
Capital employed  

Reported operating (loss)/profit 
Tax rate 
Adjusted operating profit after tax 
Return on capital employed 

Headline
£ million 
2,639  
3,367  
1,079  

Non-headline
£ million 
– 
– 
– 

(3,536 
) 
3,549  

(1,036 ) 

(839 ) 
(25.5 )% 

– 
– 

126 

102 

2021  
Total
£ million 
2,639  
3,367  
1,079  

(3,536 
) 
3,549  

Headline
£ million 
1,899 
2,731 
710 

  Non-headline 
£ million 
– 
– 
– 

2020 
Total
£ million 
1,899 
2,731 
710 

(2,316 
) 
3,024  

– 
– 

(2,316 
) 
3,024  

(910 ) 
19 % 
(737 ) 
(22.4 )% 

(775 ) 

(124) 

(628 ) 
(19.9 )% 

(100) 

(899 ) 
19 % 
(728 ) 
(23.0 )% 

Return on capital employed is calculated by dividing the adjusted operating (loss)/profit after tax by the average of the opening and 
closing capital employed. 

206 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
206  easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
Liquidity risk management 
The objective of easyJet's liquidity risk management is to ensure sufficient cash is available to meet future liabilities as they fall due and 
ensure access to cost effective funding in various markets.  

easyJet’s policy has consistently been to hold significant liquidity to mitigate the impact of potential business disruption events. easyJet 
has undertaken swift and decisive action to raise c.£7 billion in liquidity since the beginning of the pandemic, from a diversified range of 
funding sources including debt and equity. 

Liquidity raised in the year includes: 

•  sale and leaseback transactions were conducted on 35 aircraft and 2 engines generating gross proceeds of £876 million. 
•  on 8 January 2021 easyJet entered into a new five-year term loan facility of $1.87 billion underwritten by a syndicate of banks and supported by 
a partial guarantee from UK Export Finance under their Export Development Guarantee scheme. On 21 January 2021 easyJet drew down $1.05 
billion from this facility, utilising funds to repay and cancel the $500 million Revolving Credit Facility and repay term loans of $245 million and 
£200 million 

•  on 3 March 2021 easyJet FinCo B.V. issued a €1,200 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed 

by easyJet Airline Company Limited and easyJet plc. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 1.875%. 

•  on 9 September 2021 easyJet announced a fully underwritten rights issue to raise £1,235 million. This was accompanied by a new committed 

$400 million Revolving Credit Facility, which was undrawn at year end. 

The Group continues to monitor liquidity to ensure it maintains adequate levels of cash. easyJet continues to have access to various 
funding markets and a large fleet of unencumbered aircraft assets as sources of additional liquidity. 

Throughout the year easyJet had a target minimum liquidity requirement to cover the higher of unearned revenue and £2.6 million per 
100 seats in the fleet. In assessing this liquidity metric any undrawn credit facilities need to be taken into consideration. Total cash 
(excluding restricted cash) and money market deposits at 30 September 2021 was £3,536 million (2020: £2,316 million) with total liquidity 
at £4,442 million. Surplus funds are invested in high quality short-term liquid instruments, mainly money market funds, bank deposits and 
tri-party repos. During the 2022 financial year, a new liquidity policy will be introduced to maintain minimum liquidity of at least unearned 
revenue plus £500 million. easyJet would have been in compliance with this policy throughout the 2021 financial year. 

The maturity profile of financial liabilities and derivatives based on undiscounted cash flows and contractual maturities is as follows: 

At 30 September 2021 
Borrowings principal and interest 
Trade and other payables 
Lease liabilities 
FX & jet derivative contracts - receipts 
FX & jet derivative contracts - payments 
Cross-currency swap contracts - receipts 
Cross-currency swap contracts - payments 

At 30 September 2020 
Borrowings principal and interest 
Trade and other payables 
Lease liabilities 
FX & jet derivative contracts - receipts 
FX & jet derivative contracts - payments 
Cross-currency swap contracts - receipts 
Cross-currency swap contracts - payments 

Within 1 year
£ million 
358 
1,128 
251 
(1,354) 
1,230 
(16) 
30 

Within 1 year
£ million 
1,018 
837 
278 
(1,482) 
1,871 
(17) 
33 

1-2 years 
£ million 
488 
- 
239 
(313) 
291 
(446) 
405 

1-2 years 
£ million 
418 
– 
174 
(493) 
657 
(17) 
33 

2-5 years
£ million 
1,762 
- 
491 
(159) 
155 
(872) 
914 

Over 5 years
£ million 
1,070 
- 
317 
- 
- 
- 
- 

2-5 years
£ million 
1,384 
– 
332 
(89) 
93 
(1,392) 
1,396 

Over 5 years
£ million 
– 
– 
160 
– 
– 
– 
– 

The maturity profile has been calculated based on spot rates for the US dollar, Euro, Swiss franc and jet fuel at close of business on 30 
September each year. 

Credit risk management 
easyJet is exposed to credit risk arising from cash and money market deposits, derivative financial instruments and trade and other 
receivables. Credit risk management aims to reduce the risk of default by setting limits on credit exposure to counterparties based on 
their respective credit ratings. Credit ratings also determine the maximum period of investment when placing funds on deposit. The 
maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is equal to the carrying value of its financial assets, excluding tri-party repos, which 
are securitised by high quality, investment grade financial assets.  

Counterparties for cash investments and derivatives contracts are required to have a long-term credit rating of A- or better at contract 
inception from either Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch (except where there is a specific regulatory, contractual requirement or a bank 
guarantee from an A- rated entity). Exposures to these counterparties are regularly reviewed and, if the long-term credit rating falls 
below A- management will make a decision on remedial action to be taken. 

www.easyJet.com
207
www.easyJet.com  207 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

25. Financial risk and capital management continued 
The credit ratings of counterparties that easyJet holds financial assets with are as follows: 

At 30 September 2021 

Financial assets 
Trade receivables 
Other non-current assets 
Derivative financial instruments 
Restricted cash 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Total 

At 30 September 2020 

Financial assets 
Trade receivables 
Other non-current assets 
Derivative financial instruments 
Restricted cash 
Money market deposits 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Total 

A-  and 
above
£ million 

Below A- 
£ million 

Unrated/ 
Other 
£ million 

£ million 

– 
– 
219 
14 
3,534 
3,767 

– 
– 
– 
– 
2 
2 

291 
135 
- 
- 
- 
426 

291 
135 
219 
14 
3,536 
4,195 

A-  and 
above
£ million 

Below A- 
£ million 

Unrated/ 
Other 
£ million 

£ million 

– 
– 
39 
19 
32 
2,281 
2,371 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
3 
3 

53 
133 
– 
– 
– 
– 
186 

53 
133 
39 
19 
32 
2,284 
2,560 

At the end of each reporting date easyJet recognises a loss allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets measured at 
amortised cost. In establishing the appropriate amount of loss allowance to be recognised, easyJet applies either the general approach or 
the simplified approach, depending on the nature of the underlying group of financial assets. 

The general approach is applied to the impairment assessment of refundable lease deposits and other refundable lease contributions, 
restricted cash, money market deposits, and cash and cash equivalents (excluding money market funds held at fair value through profit 
or loss). Under the general approach easyJet recognises a loss allowance for a financial asset at an amount equal to the 12-month 
expected credit losses, unless the credit risk on the financial asset has increased significantly since initial recognition, in which case a loss 
allowance is recognised at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses. At 30 September 2021 this was considered immaterial. 
This is due to easyJet’s strict policy of investing only with counterparties who hold a high, investment grade credit standing (except in 
specific circumstances) as detailed in the tables above. 

The simplified approach is applied to the impairment assessment of trade and other receivables. Under the simplified approach easyJet 
always recognises a loss allowance for a financial asset at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses using the historic loss 
methodology to calculate an impairment provision.  

At 30 September 2021 trade receivables had a total loss allowance of £1 million (2020: £4 million). The exposure to individual customer’s 
credit risk is reduced as no individual customer accounts for a substantial amount of the total revenue and most payments for flight 
tickets are collected in advance of the service being provided. 

Foreign currency risk management 
The majority of easyJet's exposure to currency arises from fluctuations in the USD, EUR and CHF exchange rates which can significantly 
impact easyJet's financial results and cash flows. The aim of the foreign currency risk management is to reduce the impact of these 
exchange rate fluctuations. 

Significant currency exposures in the income statement are managed through the use of currency forward contracts entered into cash 
flow hedge relationships, in line with the Board approved policy. Throughout the year the policy stated that easyJet hedged between 
65% - 85% of the next 12 months’ forecast surplus operating cash flows on a rolling basis, and 45% - 65% of the following 12 months’ 
forecast surplus operating cash flows on a rolling basis (excluding those related to easyJet holidays).   

Following the launch of easyJet holidays the Group separately manages foreign exchange risk related to forecast cash out flows on 
package holiday costs.  

The foreign exchange hedging programmes for operational activities have continued at reduced levels due to uncertainty in exposures. 

Significant currency exposures relating to the acquisition cost or sale proceeds of aircraft are also managed through the use of FX 
forward contracts where up to 90% of the next 18 months’ forecast requirement may be hedged. 

Significant currency exposures relating to foreign currency denominated Eurobond issuances are managed through the use of cross-currency 
interest rate swap contracts where deemed appropriate. These hedges are designated as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. 

easyJet has substantial borrowings and other monetary liabilities denominated in USD and EUR, which are largely offset by holding USD 
and EUR cash and money market deposits. FX forward contracts are also used  to manage foreign exchange translation risk. These are 
classified as fair value through profit or loss (e.g. not designated in a hedge relationship). During the year easyJet decided to use EUR 
lease liabilities to hedge a proportion of its EUR Revenue receipts in a cash flow hedge relationship. Revaluations of these EUR liabilities 
are held in reserves and released on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease agreement through profit or loss. 

208 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
208  easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Management may take action to hedge other currency exposures as deemed appropriate.  

The gross notional of transactions in a hedge relationship that occurred during the financial year to manage the foreign currency risk and 
the resulting gains and losses were as follows: 

USD 
EUR 
CHF 

Notional 
380 
200 
61 

2021 
Gain/(loss)

(4) 
7 
1 

Capital financing and interest rate risk management 
The objective of capital management is to ensure that easyJet is able to continue as a going concern whilst delivering shareholder 
expectations of a strong capital base as well as returning benefits for other stakeholders.   

On the 30 September 2021, easyJet held long-term corporate credit ratings from both Standard & Poor's (BBB-) and Moody's (Baa3). 

easyJet plc established a £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme on 7 January 2016. Subsequently easyJet plc has issued 
three bonds under this programme and easyJet FinCo B.V. has issued one bond. All four bonds under this scheme are guaranteed by 
easyJet Airline Company Limited, easyJet plc and easyJet FinCo B.V. 

In February 2016, easyJet plc issued a €500 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by 
easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 1.750%. At the same time the Group entered into three 
cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the entire €500 million fixed rate Eurobond to a Sterling floating rate exposure. All three 
swaps pay floating interest (three-month LIBOR plus a margin) quarterly, receive fixed interest annually, and have maturities matching the 
Eurobond. The Group designated all three cross-currency interest rate swaps as a fair value hedge of the interest rate and currency risks 
on the €500 million Eurobond. The swaps are measured at fair value through profit or loss with any gains or losses being taken 
immediately to the income statement (except where related to timing differences related to cross-currency basis amortisation). The 
carrying value of the Eurobond is adjusted for changes in fair value attributable to the risks being hedged. This net carrying value differs 
to the swap’s fair value depending on movements in the Group's credit risk and cross-currency basis. The carrying value of the fixed rate 
Eurobond net of the cross-currency interest rate swap at 30 September 2021 was £380 million. This value does not include capitalised 
set-up costs incurred in the issuing of the bond. 

The lifetime fair value adjustment to the bond hedge item in the statement of financial position was £(53) million. During the year, fair 
value adjustments totalled £28 million which was offset by materially equal and opposite movements on the hedging instruments. 
Movements related to the hedging of foreign exchange in the year were £25 million gain with the remaining fair value movements 
relating to the hedging of interest risk.   

In October 2016 easyJet plc issued a €500 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by 
easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 1.125%. Shortly after the issuance of the €500 million 
bond the Group entered into three cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the entire €500 million fixed rate Eurobond to a 
Sterling fixed rate exposure. The cross-currency interest rate swaps were executed on 8 November 2016 with settlement and notional 
exchange occurring on 14 November 2016. All three swaps pay fixed interest semi-annually, receive fixed interest annually, and have 
maturities matching the Eurobond. The Group designated all three cross-currency interest rate swaps as a cash flow hedge of the 
currency risk on the €500 million Eurobond. The cross-currency interest rate swaps are measured at fair value with the effective portion 
taken through the statement of comprehensive income. The element of the fair value generated by the change in the spot rate is 
recycled to the income statement from the statement of comprehensive income to offset the revaluation of the Eurobond. The carrying 
value of the fixed rate Eurobond net of the cross-currency interest rate swap at 30 September 2021 was £447 million. This value does 
not include capitalised set-up costs incurred in the issuing of the bond.   

In June 2019 easyJet plc issued a €500 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by 
easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 0.875%. At the same time the Group entered into three 
cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the entire €500 million fixed rate Eurobond to a Sterling fixed rate exposure. All three 
swaps pay fixed interest semi-annually, receive fixed interest annually, and have maturities matching the Eurobond. The Group 
designated all three cross-currency interest rate swaps as a cash flow hedge of the currency risk on the €500 million Eurobond. The 
cross-currency interest rate swaps are measured at fair value with the effective portion taken through the statement of comprehensive 
income. The element of the fair value generated by the change in the spot rate is recycled to the income statement from the statement 
of comprehensive income to offset the revaluation of the Eurobond. The carrying value of the fixed rate Eurobond net of the cross-
currency interest rate swap at 30 September 2021 was £446 million. This value does not include capitalised set-up costs incurred in the 
issuing of the bond.   

The weighted average GBP interest rate hedged for the three bonds was 2.30% with a weighted average GBP/EUR foreign exchange 
hedge rate of 1.19. 

In March 2021 easyJet FinCo B.V. issued a €1,200 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme 
guaranteed by easyJet Airline Company Limited and easyJet plc. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 1.875%. As at year end 
this was not hedged. 

Interest rate cash flow risk arises on floating rate borrowings and cash investments.  

www.easyJet.com
209
www.easyJet.com  209 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

25. Financial risk and capital management continued 
Interest rate risk management policy aims to provide certainty in a proportion of financing while retaining the opportunity to benefit from 
interest rate reductions. Borrowings are issued at either fixed or floating interest rates repricing every three to six months. A significant 
proportion of the US dollar debt liabilities are matched with US dollar cash assets by value. Operating leases are a mix of fixed and 
floating rates. Of the 137 aircraft operating leases in place at 30 September 2021 (2020: 124), 95% were based on fixed interest rates and 
5% were based on floating interest rates (2020: 90% fixed, 10% floating). 

Commodity price risk management 
The Group is exposed to commodity risk in the form of jet fuel requirements and Carbon Emissions Trading System schemes (EU-ETS, 
CH-ETS & UK-ETS) price risk.  

The objective of the fuel price risk management policy is to provide protection against sudden and significant increases in jet fuel prices, 
thus mitigating volatility in the income statement in the short term. Throughout the year the policy stated that easyJet hedged between 
65% and 85% of estimated exposures up to 12 months in advance, and hedged between 45% and 65% of estimated exposures from 13 
up to 24 months in advance. Jet fuel derivatives are entered into a cash flow hedge relationship against the future forecasted jet fuel 
usage. Treasury strategies and actions will be driven by the need to meet treasury, financial and corporate objectives. 

The fuel hedging programme has continued throughout the year at reduced levels due to uncertainty in exposures. 

The volume of effective hedge transactions that occurred during the financial year to manage the jet commodity price risk was 0.6 
million metric tonnes. This resulted in a £39 million loss (2020: £77 million) (£37 million in relation to release from the Cashflow Hedge 
Reserve, and £2 million in relation to release from Cost of Hedging) in the fuel line within the Income Statement. 

The Group has a regulatory requirement to comply with EU-ETS, CH-ETS & UK-ETS on an annual basis to the relevant environmental 
agencies. easyJet is required to purchase carbon allowances on the open market to fulfil this requirement and is exposed to price 
movements that can introduce cash flow volatility. To mitigate this exposure easyJet will purchase its requirement on a spot or forward 
basis in line with Board approved policy to hedge up to 95% of anticipated exposure up to 24 months out. easyJet holds allowances for 
100% of all ETS obligations for calendar year 2021. 

Contracts maturing in the year were not classified as  financial instruments as they fell within the own use provision under IFRS 9.  

Market risk sensitivity analysis 
Financial assets and liabilities affected by market risk include borrowings, deposits, trade and other receivables, trade and other payables 
and derivative financial instruments. The following analysis illustrates the sensitivity of changes in relevant foreign exchange rates, interest 
rates and fuel prices. It should be noted that the analysis reflects the impact on profit or loss after tax for the year and other 
comprehensive income on financial instruments in a cash flow hedge relationship held at the reporting date. The sensitivities are 
calculated based on all other variables remaining constant. The analysis is considered representative of easyJet's exposure over the next 
12 month period. 

The sensitivity analysis is based on easyJet's financial assets and liabilities and financial instruments held as at 30 September 2021.  

The currency exchange rate analysis assumes a +/-10% change in both US dollar and Euro exchange rates. 

The interest rate analysis assumes a 1% increase in interest rates over the next 12 months.   

The fuel price analysis assumes a 10% increase in fuel price over the next 12 months. 

At 30 September 2021 
Income statement impact: gain/(loss) 
Impact on other comprehensive income: increase / 
(decrease) 

At 30 September 2020 
Income statement impact: gain/(loss) 
Impact on other comprehensive income: 
increase/(decrease) 

1.  GBP weakened 
2.  GBP strengthened 

US dollar 
+10%(1)
£ million 
(43) 

US dollar -
10%(2)
£ million 
35 

Euro
+10%(1)
£ million 
42 

Currency rates 
Euro  
-10%(2) 
£ million 
(34) 

Interest rates  
1% increase 
£ million 
28 

Fuel price 10%
Increase
£ million 
– 

75 

(61) 

5 

(4) 

– 

57 

US dollar 
+10%(1)
£ million 

£ million 
(13) 

US dollar -
10%(2)
£ million 

£ million 
10 

Euro
+10%(1)
£ million 

£ million 
11 

Currency rates 
Euro  
-10%(2) 
£ million 

Interest rates  
1% increase 
£ million 

Fuel price 10%
Increase
£ million 

£ million 
(9) 

£ million 
18 

£ million 
8 

(1) 

1 

(48) 

39 

– 

46 

The Market risk sensitivity analysis has been calculated on spot rates for the US dollar, EUR and jet fuel at close of business on 30 
September each year. 

210 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
210  easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impact on the financial statements during the period ended 30 September 2021 
Details of major hedging arrangements at the reporting date are set out below broken down by the notional maturity of hedge 
instruments and average rates. 

Hedge instrument (notional in millions) 

Jet fuel hedged notional 
Average hedge rate 

USD foreign exchange hedged notional 
Average hedge rate 

EUR foreign exchange hedged notional 
Average hedge rate 

CHF foreign exchange hedged notional 
Average hedge rate 

Within 
one year 
1 
498 
463 
1.34 
470 
1.12 
55 
1.21 

Greater than 
one year 
1 
481 
63 
1.34 
– 
– 
– 
– 

Notional expressed in the GBP contractual leg for currencies and metric tonnes for jet fuel   

Hedge discontinuation and ineffectiveness 

Hedge effectiveness testing on all relationships is performed at each reporting date. Whilst the critical terms matching of the Group’s 
hedge relationships means that any ineffectiveness should be minimal it can be driven by factors such as material changes in credit risk, 
price fixing basis (in the case of jet fuel) or changes in the timings of the hedged cash flows. 

Due to the reduced flying programme easyJet became over-hedged on both jet fuel and FX exposures. Where the forecasted future 
exposure was no longer expected to occur, the hedge relationship was discontinued and all gains or losses related to the hedge 
instrument transferred immediately to the income statement within non-headline. These amounts totalled a net £25 million loss in the 
year.  

Any subsequent fair value movements on these discontinued trades was recognised in headline. These amounts totalled a net 
£30 million gain in the year. In addition, following the discontinuation of hedge accounting easyJet entered into derivatives to close out a 
proportion of over-hedged positions. These derivatives were traded in an ‘equal and opposite’ direction to the discontinued trades to 
economically close out these positions and totalled a net loss of £23 million. These have been included within the total headline fair 
adjustment value resulting in a net £7 million gain. 

All hedge relationships where the underlying exposure is still anticipated to occur continue to exhibit a strong economic hedge 
relationship as the changes in fair value of hypothetical hedged items is materially offset by the changes in the fair value of hedging 
instruments. 

Additionally, fair value adjustments of £1 million (2020: £nil) were recorded during the period related to hedge ineffectiveness on hedges 
of foreign currency denominated borrowings that continue to be effective hedge relationships.  

26. Contingent liabilities and commitments  
easyJet is involved in a number of disputes and litigation which arose in the normal course of business. The likely outcome of these 
disputes and litigation cannot be predicted, and in complex cases reliable estimates of any potential obligation may not be possible.  

On 19 May 2020, easyJet announced that it had been the target of a cyber-attack from a highly sophisticated source. The email 
addresses and travel details of approximately 9 million customers were accessed and for a very small subset of customers (2,208), 
credit card details were accessed.  

The cyber-attack continues to be under investigation by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). As the cyber-attack took place 
before the United Kingdom left the European Union, the Group expects the ICO to be investigating on behalf of all EU data protection 
authorities as lead supervisory authority under the GDPR. Any penalty or enforcement action will need to be reviewed and approved by 
the other EU data protection authorities under the GDPR's cooperation process. In addition, in May 2020, a class action claim was filed in 
the UK High Court by a law firm representing a class of affected customers and claims have also been commenced or threatened in 
certain other courts and jurisdictions.  

The merit, likely outcome and potential impact on the Group of the continued investigation by the ICO, group action and other claims are 
still subject to a number of significant uncertainties and therefore the Group is unable to assess the likely outcome or quantum of the 
claims as at the date of these financial statements. 

At 30 September 2021 easyJet had outstanding letters of credit and performance bonds totalling £72 million (2020: £120 million), of 
which £43 million (2020: £89 million) expires within one year. The fair value of these instruments at each year end was negligible. 

No amount is recognised in the statement of financial position in respect of any of these financial instruments as it is not probable that 
there will be an outflow of resources. 

As part of the commitment to voluntary carbon offsetting, easyJet currently has contractual commitments to purchase Verified Emission 
Reductions worth £11 million (2020: £29 million) in total until December 2022.  

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

211
211 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

27. Government grants and assistance 
During the years ended 30 September 2020 and 2021, easyJet Airline Company Limited utilised of the Coronavirus Job Retention 
Scheme implemented by the UK government, where those employees designated as being 'furloughed workers' are eligible to have 
80 per cent of their wage costs paid up to a maximum amount of £2,500 per month. In the same period, easyJet Group (companies) 
utilised similar schemes provided by governments in Portugal, Germany, Netherlands, France, Italy and Switzerland. The total amount of 
such relief received by the Group amounted to £134 million (2020: £116 million) and is offset within employee costs in the income statement. 
There are no unfulfilled conditions or contingencies relating to these schemes. 

On 6 April 2020, easyJet issued a commercial paper through the Covid Corporate Finance Facility (CCFF) implemented by the UK 
government. Under the CCFF, easyJet received £600 million, with interest incurred at the prevailing market rate. The facility is classified 
within borrowings in the statement of financial position. On 5 March 2021 easyJet repaid £300 million of the CCFF liability, with the 
remaining £300 million was repaid in November 2021. 

On 8 January 2021 easyJet signed a five-year term loan facility of $1.87 billion, underwritten by a syndicate of banks and supported by a 
partial guarantee from UK Export Finance under their Export Development Guarantee Scheme. The Export Development Guarantee 
scheme for commercial loans is available to qualifying UK companies, does not carry preferential rates or require state aid approval, and 
contains some restrictive covenants including dividend payments, however these are compatible with easyJet's existing dividend policy. 

28. Related party transactions 
The Company licenses the easyJet brand from easyGroup Limited (‘easyGroup’), a wholly owned subsidiary of easyGroup Holdings 
Limited, an entity in which easyJet’s founder, Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou, holds a beneficial controlling interest. The Haji-Ioannou family 
concert party shareholding (being easyGroup Holdings Limited and Polys Holding Limited) holds, in total, approximately 15.27% of the 
issued share capital of easyJet plc as at 30 September 2021.  

Key management personnel who were existing shareholders were part of the rights issue that took place during the year, the issue price 
was 410 pence per share on the basis of 31 shares for every 47 fully paid ordinary shares held. 

Under the Amended Brand Licence signed in October 2010 and approved by the shareholders of easyJet plc in December 2010, an 
annual royalty of 0.25% of total revenue is payable by easyJet to easyGroup. The full term of agreement is 50 years. 

easyJet and easyGroup established a fund to meet the annual costs of protecting the ‘easy’ (and related marks) and the ‘easyJet’ brands. 
easyJet contributes up to £1 million per annum to this fund and easyGroup contributes £100,000 per annum. If easyJet contributes more 
than £1 million per annum, easyGroup will match its contribution in the ratio of 1:10 up to a limit of £5 million contributed by easyJet and 
£500,000 contributed by easyGroup. 

Three side letters have been entered into: (i) a letter dated 29 September 2016 in which easyGroup consented to easyJet acquiring a 
portion of the equity share capital in Founders Factory Limited; (ii) a letter dated 26 June 2017 in which the easyJet’s permitted usage of 
the brand was slightly extended; and (iii) a letter dated 2 February 2018 in which easyGroup agreed that certain affiliates of easyJet have 
the right to use the brand.  

The amounts included in the income statement, within other costs, for these items were as follows: 

Annual royalty 
Brand protection (legal fees paid through easyGroup to third parties) 

2021 
£ million 
4 
1 
5 

2020|
£ million 
8 
1 
9 

At 30 September 2021, £0.1 million (2020: £0.1 million) of the above aggregate amount was included in trade and other payables. 

At 30 September 2021 £5.3 million (2020: £8.5 million) is due from related parties and is included within trade and other receivables.  

29. Events after the statement of financial position date 
On 18 November 2021, the remaining £300 million Commercial paper issued through the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) was 
repaid. 

On 29 November 2021, a firm commitment was agreed with Airbus in respect of an additional 19 aircraft with deliveries between financial 
years 2025 and 2028. This results in 118 firm Airbus A320 NEO family aircraft outstanding orders on this date. The 19 firm deliveries 
consist of:  

•  Seven aircraft which easyJet had the option not to take up. This option not to take up has been relinquished and the aircraft are now 

confirmed as firm deliveries between financial years 2025 and 2026;  

•  Seven purchase option aircraft in respect of which easyJet has exercised its option to purchase. This results in firm deliveries for these aircraft 

between financial years 2025 and 2026; and  

•  Five purchase right aircraft that have been converted into aircraft with firm delivery dates in financial year 2027, which results in easyJet’s 

purchase right aircraft reducing from 58 to 53.  

212 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
212 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
COMPANY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 

Non-current assets 
Investments in subsidiary undertakings 
Deferred tax asset 

Current assets 
Other receivables  
Amounts due from subsidiary undertakings  
Derivative financial instruments with subsidiary undertakings 

Current liabilities 
Amounts due to subsidiary undertakings 
Borrowings 
Other payables 

Net current assets 

Non-current liabilities 
Borrowings 
Derivative financial instruments with subsidiary undertakings  

Net assets 

Shareholders' equity 
Share capital 
Share premium 
Hedging reserve 
Retained earnings 
Total equity 

Notes 

c 

e 

e 

As at 30 
September 
2021
£ million 

As at 30 
September 
2020
£ million 

999 
2 
1,001 

91 
3,594 
53 
3,738 

(9) 
(300) 
(37) 
(346) 

983 
4 
987 

4 
2,709 
85 
2,798 

(2) 
(600) 
(12) 
(614) 

3,392 

2,184 

(1,285) 
(33) 
(1,318) 
3,075 

207 
2,166 
(5) 
707 
3,075 

(1,356) 
– 
(1,356) 
1,815 

125 
1,051 
(15) 
654 
1,815 

The financial statements on pages 213 to 218 were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 30 November 2021 
and signed on behalf of the Board. 

In accordance with Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Company is exempt from the requirement to present its own income 
statement and statement of comprehensive income. The Company’s profit for the year was £37 million (2020: £35 million). Included in 
this amount are dividends received of £30 million (2020: £30 million), which are recognised when the right to receive payment is 
established.  

JOHAN LUNDGREN 
Director 

KENTON JARVIS 
Director 

213 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

www.easyJet.com

213

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company statement of changes in equity 

At 1 October 2020 
Profit for the year  
Other comprehensive income  
Total comprehensive income 
Share incentive schemes 
   Net proceeds from rights issue 
   Movement in reserves for employee share schemes 

At 30 September 2021 

At 1 October 2019 
Profit for the year  
Other comprehensive loss 
Total comprehensive income 
Dividends paid 
Share incentive schemes 
   Proceeds from shares issued 
   Movement in reserves for employee share schemes 
At 30 September 2020 

Share  

Capital
£ million 
125 
– 
– 
– 

Share 
premium
£ million 
1,051 
– 
– 
– 

82 
– 
207 

1,115 
– 
2,166 

Share  

Capital
£ million 
108 
– 
– 
– 
– 

17 
– 
125 

Share 
premium
£ million 
659 
– 
– 
– 
– 

392 
– 
1,051 

Hedging 
reserve
£ million 

(19) 
– 
10 
10 

– 
– 
(9) 

Hedging 
reserve
£ million 

(15) 
– 
(4) 
(4) 
– 

– 
– 
(19) 

Cost of 
hedging 
£ million  
4 
– 
– 
– 

Retained 
earnings 
£ million 
654 
37 
– 
37 

– 
– 
4 

– 
16 
707 

Cost of 
hedging 
£ million  
8 
– 
(4) 
(4) 
– 

Retained 
earnings 
£ million 
776 
35 
– 
35 
(174) 

– 
– 
4 

– 
17 
654 

Total
£ million 
1,815 
37 
10 
47 

1,197 
16 
3,075 

Total
£ million 
1,536 
35 
(8) 
27 
(174) 

409 
17 
1,815 

On 9 September 2021 the Company invited its shareholders to subscribe to a rights issue of 301,260,394 ordinary shares at an  
issue price of 410 pence per share on the basis of 31 shares for every 47 fully paid ordinary shares held, with such shares issued on 
28 September 2021.  

The rights issue resulted in £1,235 million of gross proceeds. Shares totalling 280.2 million were taken up by existing shareholders (93%) 
with the remaining rump of 21.0 million shares being underwritten.  As at 30 September 2021, there were £91 million of proceeds 
outstanding, which have been subsequently received. Costs of £38 million were incurred on the rights issue. 

No ordinary dividend in respect of the year ended 30 September 2021 is to be proposed.  

An ordinary dividend of 43.9 pence per share, or £174 million, in respect of the year ended 30 September 2019 was paid in the year 
ended 30 September 2020.  

The disclosures required in respect of share capital are shown in note 20 to the consolidated financial statements. 

214 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

www.easyJet.com 

214 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company statement of cash flows 

Cash flows from operating activities 
Cash generated from/(used in) operations (excluding dividends) 
Interest received  
Interest paid 
Dividends received 
Dividends paid 
Tax credit/(charge) 

Net cash generated from/(used in) operating activities 

Cash flows from investing activities 
Capital contribution to subsidiaries 
Loans to subsidiaries 

Cash used in investing activities 

Cash flows from financing activities 
Net proceeds from issue of ordinary share capital 
Proceeds from drawdown of bank loans and other borrowings 
Repayment of bank loans and other borrowings 

Net cash generated from financing activities 

Effect of exchange rate 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning and end of year 

Note 

f 

Year ended
30 September 
2021
£ million 

Year ended
30 September 
2020
£ million 

57 
41 
(35) 
30 
– 
4 
97 

– 
(879) 
(879) 

1,144 
– 
(371) 
773 

9 

– 

(20) 
39 
(36) 
30 
(174) 
(5) 
(166) 

(20) 
(855) 
(875) 

409 
600 
– 
1,009 

32 

– 

215 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

www.easyJet.com

215

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the company accounts 

a) Significant accounting policies 
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with international accounting standards in conformity with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 2006. 

The Company's principal activity is that of a holding company for a group of companies engaged in providing low-cost European flights 
and holidays. 

The significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of these Company financial statements are the same as those set out in 
note 1 to the consolidated financial statements with the addition of the following.  

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis; details of going concern are provided on pages 74 to 77. 

Investments 
Investments in subsidiaries are stated at cost, less any provision for impairment. Where subsidiary undertakings incur charges for share-
based payments in respect of share options and awards granted by the Company, a capital contribution in the same amount is 
recognised as an investment in subsidiary undertakings with a corresponding credit to shareholders’ equity. 

Estimates are required for assessing whether the Company’s investment carrying values are impaired. This requires estimation of the 
investment ‘value in use’, which requires an assessment of the future cash flows which are expected to arise from the investments held in 
addition to applying other suitable assumptions. These assumptions primarily align to those disclosed in note 10 to the consolidated 
financial statements. This represents a critical accounting estimate for the Company. 

Receivables 
Receivables are recognised initially at fair value, and subsequently at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less any 
expected credit losses. 

b) Income statement and statement of total comprehensive income 
In accordance with Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Company is exempt from the requirement to present its own income 
statement and statement of comprehensive income.  The Company’s profit for the year was £37 million (2020: £35 million). Included in 
this amount are dividends received of £30 million (2020: £30 million), which are recognised when the right to receive payment is 
established. 

The Company has eight employees at 30 September 2021 (2020: eight). These employees are the Non-Executive Directors of easyJet 
plc; their remuneration is paid by easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Executive Directors of easyJet plc are employed and paid by 
easyJet Airline Company Limited. Details of Directors' remuneration are disclosed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements and 
in the Directors' Remuneration Report on pages 130 to 153. 

c) Investments in subsidiary undertakings 
Investments in subsidiary undertakings were as follows: 

At 1 October 
Capital contributions to subsidiaries 

At 30 September 

2021 
£ million 
983 
16 
999 

2020
£ million 
945 
38 
983 

During the year £16 million (2020: £18 million) capital contributions of share awards (as explained in note a above) was provided to Group 
companies. No other cash contributions were made during the year (2020: £20 million). 

216 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021

www.easyJet.com 

216 

 
 
 
 
 
 
A full list of Group companies is detailed below. 

easyJet Airline Company Limited (2) 
easyJet Switzerland S.A. (3) 
easyJet Sterling Limited (1) (4) 
easyJet Leasing Limited (1) (4) 
easyJet UK Limited (2) 
easyJet Europe Airline GmbH (6) 
easyJet FinCo B.V. (5) 
easyJet MT Limited (8) 
easyJet HQ Holdings Limited (2) (7) 
easyJet HQ Limited (2) (7) 
easyJet HQ Development Limited (2) (7) 
easyJet Holidays Holdings Limited (2) 
easyJet Holidays Limited (2) 
easyJet Holidays Transport Limited (2) 

Country of incorporation 

Principal activity 

England and Wales 
Switzerland 
Cayman Islands 
Cayman Islands 
England and Wales 
Austria 
Netherlands 
Malta 
England and Wales 
England and Wales 
England and Wales 
England and Wales 
England and Wales 
England and Wales 

  Airline operator 
  Airline operator 
  Aircraft trading and leasing 
  Aircraft trading and leasing 
  Airline operator 
  Airline operator 
  Financing company 
  Insurance 
  Holding company 
  Development of building projects 
  Development of building projects 
  Holding company 
  Tour operator 
  Air transport 

Percentage of
ordinary shares 
held 
100  
49* 
100  
100  
100  
100  
100  
100  
100  
100  
100  
100  
100  
100  

1.  Although these companies are Cayman Islands incorporated they have always been, and continue to be, UK tax resident. 
2.  Hangar 89, London Luton Airport, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU2 9PF 
3.  5 Route de l’Aeroport, Meyrin, CH-1215 Geneve 15, Switzerland 
4.  Governor’s Square, West Bay Road, Lime Tree Bay Road, UNIT # 2-105 , PO Box 1982, Grand Cayman KY1-1104, Cayman Islands 
5.  Westerdoksdijk 423, 1013BX Amsterdam, Netherlands 
6.  Wagramer Stasse 19, 11.Stock IZD Tower, 1220 Wien, Austria. 
7.  These UK entities are all 100% owned by the Group and are dormant subsidiary entities. They are exempt from the requirement to prepare individual financial 
statements by virtue of s394A of the Companies Act 200, exempt from audit by virtue of s479A of the Companies Act 200 and exempt from filing with the 
registrar by virtue of s448A of the Companies Act 2006.  

8.  Newly incorporated in the 2021 financial year   

*  The Company has a 49% interest in easyJet Switzerland S.A. with an option to acquire the remaining 51%. The option is automatically extended for a further year on 
a rolling basis, unless the option is terminated by written agreement prior to the automatic renewal date. easyJet Switzerland S.A. is a subsidiary on the basis that the 
Company exercises a dominant influence over the undertaking. A non-controlling interest has not been reflected in the consolidated financial statements on the 
basis that holders of the remaining 51% of the shares have no entitlement to any dividends from that holding and the Company has an option to acquire those 
shares for a predetermined minimal consideration. The Company has 100% of voting rights for all other subsidiaries. 

d) Financial instruments 
In February 2016, easyJet plc issued a €500 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by 
easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 1.750%. At the same time the Group entered into three 
cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the entire €500 million fixed rate Eurobond to a floating rate Sterling exposure.  

In October 2016 easyJet plc issued a €500 million bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by 
easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 1.125%. At the same time the Group entered into three 
cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the entire €500 million fixed rate Eurobond to a Sterling fixed rate exposure. 

In June 2019 easyJet plc issued a €500 million a bond under the £3,000 million Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by 
easyJet Airline Company Limited. The Eurobond pays an annual fixed coupon of 0.875%. At the same time the Group entered into three 
cross-currency interest rate swaps to convert the entire €500 million fixed rate Eurobond to a fixed rate Sterling exposure. 

On 6 April 2020 easyJet issued a £600 million Commercial Paper through the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF). This is an 
unsecured, short term paper issued at a discount, of which £300 million was repaid in March 2021 and the remaining £300 million was 
repaid in November 2021.  

For further details please refer to note 24 of the consolidated financial statements. 

e) Borrowings 

At 30 September 2021 
Eurobond 
Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) 

At 30 September 2020 
Eurobond 
Commercial Paper (Covid Corporate Financing Facility) 

Current 
£ million 
– 
300 

300 

Non-current
£ million 
1,285 
– 

1,285 

Current 
£ million 
– 
600 

600 

Non-current
£ million 
1,356 
– 

1,356 

Total
£ million 
1,285 
300 

1,585 

Total
£ million 
1,356 
600 

1,956 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

217
217 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N O T E S   T O   T H E   A C C O U N T S   ( C O N T I N U E D )  

f) Reconciliation of profit for the year to cash generated from operations 

Profit for the year 

Adjustments for: 
Net finance and other similar income 
Unrealised foreign exchange differences 
Tax credit 
Dividends received   

Operating cash flows before movement in working capital 

Changes in working capital: 
Increase in trade and other debtors  
Increase in trade and other payables 
Increase in amounts due from subsidiary undertakings 
Increase in amounts due to subsidiary undertakings 
Increase/(decrease) in derivative financial instruments 

2021 
£ million 
37 

2020
£ million 
35 

(6) 
– 
(2) 
(30) 

(1) 

(33) 
25 
(16) 
7 
75 
57 

(4) 
(1) 
– 
(30) 

– 

– 
12 
(4) 
– 
(28) 
(20) 

g) Guarantees and contingent liabilities 
The Company has given a formal undertaking to the Civil Aviation Authority to guarantee the payment and discharge of all liabilities of 
easyJet Airline Company Limited, a subsidiary of the Company. The guarantee is required for that company to maintain its operating 
licence under Regulation 3 of the Licensing of Air Carriers Regulations 1992. 

The Company has issued a guarantee in favour of easyJet Airline Company Limited, a subsidiary undertaking, in relation to the processing 
of credit card transactions, and also in respect of hedging transactions carried out according to treasury policy. 

The Company has guaranteed the contractual obligations of easyJet Airline Company Limited and easyJet Leasing Limited, both 
subsidiary undertakings, in respect of its contractual obligations to Airbus SAS in respect of the supply of Airbus 320 family aircraft. 

On 8 January 2021 the Company guaranteed the contractual obligations of easyJet Airline Company Limited, a subsidiary undertaking, in 
respect of a $1.87 billion term loan facility, from which easyJet Airline Company Limited drew down $1.05 billion on the 22 January 2021. 
This facility is due to expire in January 2026. 

On 3 March 2021 the Company guaranteed the contractual obligations of easyJet FinCo B.V, a subsidiary undertaking, in respect of a 
€1.2 billion bond issuance under the Euro Medium Term Note (EMTN) Programme. The bond has a coupon of 1.875% and matures in 
March 2028. 

The Company has guaranteed the contractual obligations of easyJet Airline Company Limited, a subsidiary undertaking, in respect of a 
$400 million Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility was agreed on 9 September 2021, for a minimum of four and a 
maximum of six years. 

The Company has guaranteed the repayment of borrowings that financed the acquisition of aircraft by subsidiary undertakings.  The 
Company has also guaranteed the payment obligations for the lease of aircraft by subsidiary undertakings. 

The Company has guaranteed certain letters of credit issued on behalf of subsidiary undertakings. 

easyJet plc has given a formal undertaking to the Civil Aviation Authority to guarantee the payment and discharge of all liabilities of 
easyJet Holidays Limited. The guarantee is required for easyJet Holidays Limited, easyJet Airline Company Limited and easyJet Holidays 
Transport Limited to maintain its ATOL’s under The Civil Aviation (Air Travel Organisers’ Licensing) Regulations 2012. easyJet plc has also 
issued guarantees in favour of easyJet Holidays Limited and easyJet Airline Company Limited relating to processing of credit card 
transactions; and brand licence agreement with easyGroup Limited. 

No amount is recognised in the Company statement of financial position in respect to any of these guarantees as it is not probable that 
there will be an outflow of resources. 

h) Related party transactions 
Transactions with subsidiary undertakings, which principally relate to the provision of funding within the Group, are carried out on an 
arm's length basis. Outstanding balances are placed on intercompany accounts with no specified credit period, are unsecured, and bear 
market rates of interest. 

For full details of transactions and arrangements with easyJet’s largest shareholder, see note 28 of the consolidated financial statements. 

i) Events after the balance sheet date 
On 18 November 2021, the remaining £300 million Commercial paper issued through the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) was 
repaid.  

218 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
218 

easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Five-year summary 

Income statement 
Revenue 
Total EBITDAR 
Headline EBITDAR 
Total operating (loss)/profit 
Headline operating (loss)/profit 
Total (loss)/profit before tax 
Headline (loss)/profit before tax 
Total (loss)/profit after tax 
Headline (loss)/profit after tax 

Basic total (loss)/earnings per share - pence 
Basic headline (loss)/earnings per share - pence 
Diluted total (loss)/earnings per share - pence 
Diluted headline (loss)/earnings per share - pence 
Ordinary dividend per share - pence 

Statement of financial position 
Non-current assets 
Current assets 
Current liabilities 
Non-current liabilities 
Net assets 

Net (debt)/cash 
Operating activities 
Investing activities 
Financing activities (excluding movements in  
borrowings and money market deposits) 
Loan issue costs 
Fair value and foreign exchange gains/(losses) 
Net (decrease)/increase in net (debt)/cash 

Key performance indicators 
Headline return on capital employed 
Net (debt)/cash 
Airline total (loss)/profit before tax per seat (£) 
Airline headline (loss)/profit before tax per seat (£) 
Airline revenue per seat (£) 
Airline total cost per seat (£) 
Airline headline cost per seat (£) 
Airline total cost per seat excluding fuel (£) 
Airline headline cost per seat excluding fuel (£) 
Seats flown (millions) 

2021
(as reported)
£ million 

2020
(as reported)
£ million 

2019 
(restated) 
£ million 

2018
(as reported)
£ million 

2017
(restated)
£ million 

1,458 
(425) 
(551) 
(910) 
(1,036) 
(1,036) 
(1,136) 
(858) 
(900) 

(159.0) 
(166.9) 
(159.0) 
(166.9) 
– 

5,608 
4,165 
(2,677) 
(4,457) 
2,639 

(1,035) 
719 

(1) 
23 
(64) 
(390) 

(25.5)% 
(910) 
(36.33) 
(39.87) 
50.54 
(86.87) 
(90.41) 
(73.72) 
(77.25) 
28.2 

3,009 
(358) 
(273) 
(899) 
(777) 
(1,273) 
(835) 
(1,079) 
(725) 

(222.9) 
(149.7) 
(222.9) 
(149.7) 
– 

5,910 
2,563 
(3,826) 
(2,748) 
1,899 

(776) 
23 

(22) 
– 
(66) 
(841) 

(19.9)% 
(1,125) 
(22.66) 
(14.68) 
54.35 
(77.01) 
(69.03) 
(63.92) 
(55.94) 
55.1 

6,385 
970 
970 
466 
466 
430 
427 
349 
349 

88.6 
88.7 
87.8 
87.8 
43.9 

5,898 
839 
961 
463 
595 
445 
578 
358 
466 

90.9 
118.3 
90.2 
117.4 
58.6 

6,044 
2,119 
(2,668) 
(2,510) 
2,985 

4,994 
1,999 
(2,060) 
(1,700) 
(3,233) 

761 
(863) 

(9) 
6 
(86) 
(191) 

11.4% 
(326) 
4.1 
4.07 
60.81 
56.71 
56.74 
43.23 
43.26 
105.0 

961 
(906) 

(21) 
(1) 
6 
39 

14.6% 
396 
4.68 
6.07 
61.94 
57.26 
55.87 
44.82 
43.43 
95.2 

5,047 
709 
733 
404 
428 
385 
408 
305 
325 

77.4 
82.5 
76.8 
81.9 
40.9 

4,237 
1,734 
(1,670) 
(1,499) 
2,802 

663 
(515) 

(10) 
6 
– 
144 

11.9% 
357 
4.45 
4.71 
58.23 
53.78 
53.52 
41.53 
41.27 
86.7 

1.  See note 1 to the 2019 financial statements for details of the change in accounting policy. 
2.  See note 1 to the 2017 financial statements for details of the change in accounting policy. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

219
219 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Glossary – Alternative performance measures (APMs) 

Non-headline items 

Headline loss before tax 

Material non-recurring items or items which are not considered to be reflective of the trading performance of the 
business (See note 1a) 
A measure of underlying performance which is not impacted by material non-recurring items or items which are not 
considered to be reflective of the trading performance of the business. 

Statutory loss before tax 
Total non-headline (credit)/charge before tax (see note 5) 

Headline loss before tax 

Year ended 
30 September 
 2021 
(1,036) 
(100) 

Year ended
30 September
 2020 
(1,273) 
438 

(1,136) 

(835) 

EBITDAR 
Headline EBITDAR 

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation and aircraft rental. 
Earnings before non-headline items, interest, taxes, depreciation, amortisation and aircraft rental. 

Statutory operating loss  
Add back: 
Aircraft dry leasing 
Depreciation 
Amortisation of intangible assets 

EBITDAR 
Non-headline (credit)/charge within operating profit (see note 5) 

Headline EBITDAR 

Year ended 
30 September 
 2021 
£ million 
(910) 

Year ended
30 September
 2020
£ million 
(899) 

5 
456 
24 
(425) 
(126) 
(551) 

1 
485 
18 
(395) 
122 
(273) 

Net debt 

Total cash less borrowings and lease liabilities. (Cash includes money market deposits but excludes restricted cash). 

Borrowings 
Lease Liabilities 
Cash and money market deposits (excluding restricted cash) 
Net debt  

2021 
Total 
£ million 
3,367 
1,079 
(3,536) 
910 

2020
Total
£ million 
2,731 
710 
(2,316) 
1,125 

Return on Capital 
employed (ROCE) 
Headline return on capital 
employed (ROCE) 

Operating profit, less tax at the prevailing UK corporation tax rate at the end of the financial year, divided by 
average capital employed (shareholder equity less net cash/debt). 
Operating profit less non-headline items, less tax at the prevailing UK corporation tax rate at the end of the financial 
year, divided by average capital employed (shareholder equity less net cash/debt). 

220 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
220  easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shareholders' equity 
Net debt  
Capital employed  

Reported operating (loss)/profit 
Tax rate 
Adjusted operating profit after tax 

Return on capital employed 

Reported operating (loss)/profit 
Non-headline (credit)/charge within operating profit (see note 5) 
Headline Reported operating (loss)/profit 
Tax rate 
Adjusted headline operating profit after tax 

Headline return on capital employed 

2021
Total
£ million 
2,639 
910 
3,549 

(910) 
19% 
(737) 
(22.4)% 

(910) 
(126) 
(1,036) 
19% 
(839) 
(25.5)% 

2020
Total
£ million 
1,899 
1,125 
3,024 

(899) 
19% 
(728) 

(23.0)% 

(899) 
122 
(777) 
19% 
(629) 

(19.9)% 

Basic headline 
(loss)/earnings per  
share – pence 
Diluted headline 
(loss)/earnings per  
share - pence 

Total headline loss for the year divided by the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year 
after adjusting for shares held in employee benefit trusts. 

Diluted headline (loss)/earnings per share, the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue is 
adjusted to assume conversion of all dilutive potential shares.  

Total loss for the year 
Total non-headline (credit)/charge before tax (see note 5) 
Tax impact of non-headline items 
Headline Loss 

Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to calculate basic loss per share 
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used to calculate diluted loss per share 

Headline loss per share 
Basic 
Diluted 

2021
£ million 
(858) 
(100) 
58 
(900) 

2021
£ million 
539 
539 

2021
pence 
(166.9) 
(166.9) 

2020
Restated
£ million 
(1,079) 
438 
(84) 
(725) 

2020
£ million 
484 
484 

2020
pence 
(149.7) 
(149.7) 

Constant currency 
measures 

These performance measures are calculated by comparing 2021 financial year performance translated at the 2020 
financial year effective exchange rate, excluding foreign exchange gains and losses in statement of financial position 
revaluations. 

www.easyJet.com
www.easyJet.com 

221
221 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Glossary 

Aircraft dry / 
wet leasing 
Aircraft owned/leased at 
end of year 
ATC 
Available seat kilometres 
(ASK) 
Average adjusted  
capital employed 

Block hours 
Capital employed 
Cash collateralisation 
CCFF 
Cost per ASK 
Cost per seat 
Cost per seat, excluding 
fuel 
CRM 
CSAT 

CSAT 
Gearing 

Load factor 
Normalised operating 
profit after tax 
OEM 
Operated aircraft 
utilisation 

Other costs 
Other income 

Dry leasing arrangements relate solely to the provision of an aircraft. Wet leasing arrangements relate to the 
provision of aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance. 

Number of aircraft owned or on lease arrangements of over one month’s duration at the end of the period. 
Air Traffic Control 

Seats flown multiplied by the number of kilometres flown. 

The average of opening and closing capital employed. 
Hours of service for aircraft, measured from the time that the aircraft leaves the terminal at the departure airport to 
the time that it arrives at the terminal at the destination airport. 
Shareholders’ equity less net cash/debt. 
The process of pledging cash to serve as a lender’s protection against a borrower’s default.  
Covid Corporate Financing Facility 
Revenue less profit before tax, divided by available seat kilometres. 
Revenue less profit before tax, divided by seats flown. 

Revenue, less profit before tax, plus fuel costs, divided by seats flown. 
Customer Relationship Management 
Customer Satisfaction  
A weighted average of responses of surveys sent to customers who experienced either an on-time, delayed, 
severely delayed or cancelled flight. 
Net cash/debt divided by the sum of shareholders’ equity and adjusted net cash/debt. 
Number of passengers as a percentage of number of seats flown. The load factor is not weighted for the effect of 
varying sector lengths. 

Reported operating profit, less tax at the prevailing UK corporation tax rate at the end of the financial year. 
Original Equipment Manufacturer 

Average number of block hours per day per aircraft operated. 
Administrative and operational costs not reported elsewhere, including some employee costs, compensation paid to 
passengers and the profit or loss on the disposal of property plant and equipment. 
Includes insurance receipts, compensation, dividends received and gains on sale and leaseback transactions. 
Number of earned seats flown. Earned seats comprises seats sold to passengers (including no-shows), seats 
provided for promotional purposes and seats provided to staff for business travel. 

Revolving Credit Facility 
The sum of passenger revenue and ancillary revenue. 

Passengers 
Profit before tax per seat  Profit before tax divided by seats flown. 
RCF 
Revenue 
Revenue passenger  
kilometres (RPK) 
Revenue per ASK 
Revenue per seat 
SAF  
Seats flown 
Sector 
UKEF 
VCS 

Number of passengers multiplied by the number of kilometres those passengers were flown. 
Revenue divided by available seat kilometres. 
Revenue divided by seats flown. 
Sustainable Aviation Fuel 
Seats available for passengers. 
A one-way revenue flight  
UK Export Finance 
Verified Carbon Standard 

222 easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021
222  easyJet plc Annual Report and Accounts 2021 

 
 
Shareholder Information

MANAGING YOUR SHARES  
AND SHAREHOLDER 
COMMUNICATIONS 
The Company’s share register is maintained 
by our registrar, Equiniti. Shareholders with 
queries relating to their shareholding should 
contact Equiniti directly using one of the 
methods listed below:

Equiniti Limited 
Aspect House 
Spencer Road 
Lancing 
West Sussex 
BN99 6DA

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 
The Board currently intends to hold the 
AGM on 10 February 2022 at 11.00am, 
subject to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic 
and any UK Government guidance on 
social distancing, non-essential travel or 
public gatherings. The arrangements for 
the Company’s 2022 AGM and details of 
the resolutions to be proposed, together 
with explanatory notes, will be set out in 
the Notice of AGM to be published on the 
Company’s website. Guidance on whether 
physical attendance by shareholders will be 
possible will be determined nearer the time 
of the AGM. 

DIVIDENDS
Should the Company pay any dividends, 
they can be paid quickly and securely 
directly into your bank account instead of 
being dispatched to you by cheque. You 
may also choose to have your dividends 
reinvested in further shares of the 
Company through our Dividend 
Reinvestment Plan (DRIP) (terms and 
conditions apply). To arrange either of 
these options, simply call Equiniti on the 
number provided. Alternatively, you can 
manage your dividend payment choices  
by registering with Shareview at  
www.shareview.co.uk.

SHARE GIFT
Shareholders who only have a small 
number of shares whose valuation makes it 
uneconomic to sell them may wish to 
consider donating them to charity through 
ShareGift, the independent charity share 
donation scheme (registered charity no. 
1052686). Further information may be 
obtained from ShareGift on 020 7930 3737 
or at sharegift.org

SHAREHOLDER FRAUD
Fraud is on the increase and many 
shareholders are targeted every year.  
If you have any reason to believe that you 
may have been the target of a fraud, or 
attempted fraud in relation to your 
shareholding, please contact 
Equiniti immediately.

Telephone: 0371 384 2577* 
Telephone (outside UK): +44 121 415 7047 
Online: help.shareview.co.uk 
Website: www.equiniti.com

 * Lines are open Monday to Friday 8.30am to 

5.30pm, excluding bank holidays 

Shareholders can manage their holdings 
online or elect to receive shareholder 
documentation/communication 
in electronic form by registering  
at www.shareview.co.uk. Some of 
the benefits of having a Shareview 
portfolio are:

•  track share price and recent 

performance;

•  view and manage all of your 
shareholdings in one place;

•  buy and sell shares instantly online with 

the share dealing service;

•  find comprehensive shareholder 

information and forms;

•  update your records following a change 

of address;

•  have dividends paid into your 

bank account; and

•  vote in advance of Company 

general meetings.

Shareholders who have elected to receive 
electronic communication but require a 
paper copy of any of the Company’s 
shareholder documentation, or wish to 
change their instructions, should contact 
Equiniti directly using one of the methods 
listed above.

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
1 Embankment Place 
London 
WC2N 6RH

COMPANY’S REGISTERED 
OFFICE
Hangar 89 
London Luton Airport 
Luton 
Bedfordshire 
LU2 9PF

Telephone: 01582 525019 
Registered in England & Wales under 
number 03959649

CORPORATE WEBSITE
You can access the corporate website  
at https://corporate.easyjet.com. 
The corporate website provides useful 
information including annual reports,  
results announcements and share price 
data, as well as background information 
about the Company and current issues. 
Shareholders are encouraged to sign up  
to receive email notification of results  
and press announcements as they  
are released by registering at  
https://corporate.easyjet.com/investors

SHARE PRICE INFORMATION
Details of our share price data and  
other share price tools are available at 
https://corporate.easyjet.com/investors

www.easyJet.com

223

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATIONPrinted by Park Communications on  
FSC® certified paper.

Park works to the EMAS standard and its 
Environmental Management System is 
certified to ISO 14001.

This publication has been manufactured 
using 100% offshore wind electricity 
sourced from UK wind.

100% of the inks used are vegetable oil 
based, 95% of press chemicals are recycled 
for further use and, on average 99% of any 
waste associated with this production will 
be recycled and the remaining 1% used to 
generate energy.

This document is printed on  
Galerie Satin paper made of material  
from well-managed, FSC®-certified forests 
and other controlled sources.

Designed and produced by Black Sun plc

Thank you

We’d like to thank everyone who  
has helped to produce this report:

Antonia Antoniou, Jane Ashton, Justin Baker, Tasneem Baiyat, Sruti Bajoria, Michael 
Barker, Meena Bhatia-Ahir, Maxwell Bruce, Gail Butler, Phil Chastell, Lou Darley, Claire 
Dickinson, Jonathan Diec, Alex Field, James Fisher, Matt Garner, Kenton Jarvis, Matt 
Landsman, Alex Larkin, Ryan Mynard, Paul Robbins, Zarina Sabir, Ryan Simmons, Chris 
Sominka, Ben Souter, Ben Matthews, Julie Morris, Adam Mould, Anthony Pallant, Liz 
Perry, Ryan Purvis, Megan Quiddington, Mark Ramsden, Raminder Shergill, Adrian 
Talbot, Kieran Talwar, Tim Taylor, Lisa Tsavalos, Jessica Vaughan, Lucy Walker,  
James Whittingham, Holly Younger and all of our employees across the network.

Hangar 89 
London Luton Airport 
Luton 
Bedfordshire 
LU2 9PF

www.easyJet.com