E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
A B N 3 2 0 9 2 4 7 1 5 1 3
A n n u a l R e p o r t
f o r t h e y e a r e n d e d 3 0 J u n e 2 0 0 8
TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S
PAGE
1. Corporate Directory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IFC
2. Highlights of 2007-2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
3. Chairman’s Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4. Review of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
6. Directors’ Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
7. Income Statement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
8. Balance Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
9. Statement of Changes in Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
10. Cash Flow Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
11. Notes to the Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
12. Directors’ Declaration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
13. Independent Auditor’s Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
14. Additional Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
1 . C O R P O R AT E D I R E C T O R Y
DIRECTORS
Adrian Griffin BSc.(Hons) – Chairman
David Sargeant BSc. – Managing Director
Adrian Jessup BSc.(Hons) – Executive Director
MANAGEMENT
David Ross
BSc.(Hons) MSc. – Exploration Manager
COMPANY SECRETARY
Simon Storm
BCom. BCompt.(Hons) CA FCIS
REGISTERED and PRINCIPAL OFFICE
53 Canning Highway
Victoria Park 6100
Western Australia
Phone +61 (0)8 9361 3100
Facsimile +61 (0)8 9361 3184
Email info@resourcesempire.com.au
Website www.resourcesempire.com.au
ABN 32 092 471 513
SHARE REGISTRY
Security Transfer Registrars Pty Ltd
770 Canning Highway
Applecross 6153
Western Australia
AUDITOR
RSM Bird Cameron Partners
8 St George’s Terrace
Perth 6000
Western Australia
STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING
The Company is listed on the
Australian Securities Exchange Limited:
Home Exchange, Perth.
ASX code:
Shares – ERL
Options – ERLO
2 .
H I G H L I G H T S O F 2 0 0 7 - 2 0 0 8
> Discoveries & resources added during the first full year on the ASX
> 52,000-ounce gold resource confirmed at Penny’s Find (WA)
> Positive scoping development study completed at Penny’s Find
> High grade Cu-Au discovery at 100%-owned Yuinmery (WA)
> Major potential to expand zones of mineralisation at Yuinmery
by further drilling
> Apex Minerals secured as shareholder and potential partner
for treatment of Yuinmery copper-gold mineralisation
> Adequate funding for Empire through 2009 via Apex Minerals placement
> 80% earning interest in under-explored Larkin’s Find (WA)
nickel project which contains a JORC Resource of 5.2 million
tonnes averaging 0.8% nickel and 0.08% cobalt
> Numerous strong uranium anomalies identified at Yarlarweelor (WA)
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 1
3 . C H A I R M A N ’ S R E P O R T T O S H A R E H O L D E R S
Dear Shareholders
It is my pleasure to present to you this annual report, which outlines Empire's first full year of operation since listing on
the ASX on 1 February 2007. During the reporting period, the Company enjoyed great exploration success,
commencing with an upgrade of resources at Penny's Find (WA) to 314,000 tonnes at a grade of 5.18 g/t for an
estimated 52,000 ounces of contained gold.This result, achieved only six months after drilling began, was the result of
two drilling campaigns, each followed by a resource evaluation.
Drilling commenced at Yuinmery (WA) in October 2007.The first results were released in November, with the gold and
copper tenors indicating Empire had made a significant discovery. Further drilling verified the geological occurrence as
being a volcanogenic massive sulphide deposit associated with felsic magmatism. Copper values as high as 5.53% and
gold values up to 12.85 g/t were realised, and structural assessment confirmed the target horizon was synclinal in form,
suggesting that most mineralisation will be contained within the Company's ground.
The success of Empire's evaluation programs at Yuinmery did not go unnoticed within the industry. Indeed, published
results attracted a strong partner, Apex Minerals NL, which owns the nearby Youanmi gold mine - the processing plant at
this mine includes a flotation circuit which could be amenable for the production of concentrates from Yuinmery.
Apex and Empire have entered into an agreement to set the commercial terms for jointly developing the project.
In addition, Apex took a significant placement only days after the end of the 2008 financial year, and now holds
approximately 6.95% of Empire.
Not all of our endeavours in the past year were successful, however, and the high risk associated with exploration was
reflected in the Company's Torrens Project (SA).There, a single diamond drillhole penetrated 770 metres without
intersecting the source of a circular gravity anomaly interpreted as a potential IOCG occurrence. Cognisant of the high
risks associated with examination of deep geophysical targets, we have as a consequence left five similar anomalies untested.
Even with a first full year of mainly positive exploration results, the market capitalisation of Empire has declined, along
with that of many other junior exploration companies. Despite this, the board takes comfort in the fact that we have
managed to convert exploration dollars into discoveries and resources. Also, the funds raised through the Apex
placement, and the Company's mineral endowment, place us in a positive position for 2009 and beyond.
The Company will continue to develop its exploration portfolio, but will retain enough flexibility to capitalise on
other opportunities as they arise.We value the support of each and every one of our shareholders, and encourage your
continued support of Empire Resources.
Adrian Griffin
Chairman
REGISTERED and PRINCIPAL OFFICE
53 Canning Highway, Victoria Park WA 6100 (cnr Taylor Street)
Phone +618 9361 3100 Fax +618 9361 3184
Page 2
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
4 .
R E V I E W O F O P E R AT I O N S
REVIEW OF EXPLORATION
CORPORATE OBJECTIVES
The Company’s long-term objective is to become a
successful mining house through participation in the
discovery and development of one or more world-class
mineral deposits.
Empire’s short-term objective is to enhance value
and obtain a cash flow from the Company’s existing
tenements in Australia, which have potential for gold,
copper, uranium, nickel and platinum group metal
(‘PGM’) deposits.This value may be realised by
delineating reserves and commencing mining
operations, entering into significant farm-out
or royalty arrangements, and/or taking advantage
of new opportunities to provide an early cash flow.
In the 17 months since the Company listed on
the ASX, it has maintained a high level of exploration
work, completing 10 separate drilling programmes at
Penny’s Find,Yuinmery,Torrens and Troy Creek. In
addition, geophysical surveys – comprising magnetics,
electromagnetics (‘EM’), gravity and radiometrics –
have been completed at Empire’s Yuinmery,Torrens,
Yarlarweelor and Troy Creek projects, to help
accurately define drill targets.
As a result of this work, Empire has not only defined
a 52,000-ounce gold resource at Penny’s Find but also
discovered significant copper-gold mineralisation at its
Yuinmery project.
Darwin
I N D I A N
O C E A N
Derby
Port Hedland
W E S T E R N
A U S T R A L I A
PARADIS
N O R T H E R N
T E R R I T O R Y
N
Cairns
YARLARWEELOR
TROY CREEK
YUINMERY
NOONDIE
Alice Springs
Q U E E N S L A N D
S O U T H
A U S T R A L I A
Brisbane
Kalgoorlie
LARKIN’S FIND
PENNY’S FIND
Perth
Albany
TORRENS
N E W S O U T H
W A L E S
Adelaide
Sydney
V I C T O R I A
Melbourne
0
500
1000km
T A S M A N I A
Hobart
Empire’s projects in Western and South Australia.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 3
PENNY’S FIND: gold
100% interest
Empire’s Penny’s Find project, which is situated in
the Eastern Goldfields region of Western Australia,
lies 50 kilometres northeast of Kalgoorlie and
30 kilometres from the Kanowna Belle Gold Mine.
Within mining lease M27/156, gold mineralisation is
associated with quartz veining developed at or near a
sheared contact between basalts and sediments.
At Penny’s Find, the Company previously outlined a
gold resource of 314,000 tonnes @ 5.18 g/t Au down
to a vertical depth of 150 metres below surface. The
mineral resource estimate is summarised in the
following table.
PENNY’S FIND MINERAL RESOURCE
Category
Measured
Indicated
Inferred
TOTAL
Tonnes
79,000
132,000
103,000
314,000
Grade* (g/t Au)
4.40
3.98
7.33
5.18
Ounces
11,120
16,880
24,313
52,313
* Grades are based on a minimum cut-off of 0.5 g/t Au and high
assays cut to 25 g/t Au
In the year ending June 2008, Empire completed a
diamond drilling programme consisting of four holes
totalling 1,259 metres and a rotary air blast (‘RAB’)
drilling programme of 118 holes for 5,867 metres.
The diamond drilling programme was designed to test
the depth extensions to high-grade gold mineralisation
previously outlined by reverse circulation (‘RC’)
drilling; for example, 5 m @ 20.88 g/t Au at a depth
of 140 metres from surface.Three of the four diamond
drill holes returned high-grade gold values in narrow
quartz veins within the target zone, while one missed
the target due to a fault offsetting the lode structure.
Gold was visible in quartz veins from two of the holes.
Of the intersections recorded, the better ones were as
follows.
Hole PFD001
0.50 m @ 8.11 g/t Au from 271.75 m
Hole PFD002 0.60 m @ 10.30 g/t Au from 272.50 m
Hole PFD004
2.00 m @ 5.50 g/t Au from 221.90 m
Also completed during the year was a pre-feasability
study which examined various mining and treatment
options in relation to open-pit mining of the Penny’s
Find resource.The study concluded that additional
open-pittable resources should be added to the
inventory before further studies were undertaken,
as this would markedly improve the estimated
return for the project. In addition, Empire is actively
investigating other options for the resource, in order
to maximise the return to shareholders.
Elsewhere within the Penny’s Find project area,
potential exists for additional gold resources. One area
with exploration potential is the extension of the
Penny’s Find contact zone. Lying on the contact
between basalts and sediments, it can be traced for
several kilometres along strike in a northerly direction
(the trends are based on drilling information and
aeromagnetic data). RAB drilling located 18 m @
1.71 g/t Au from 44 metres in a hole 2 kilometres
north of Penny’s Find, close to the contact described
above.This RAB programme also located a potentially
new area of gold mineralisation 2 kilometres north-
west of Penny’s Find, where a drill hole returned
4 m @ 0.82 g/t Au from 44 metres’ depth. An RC
drilling programme will test these RAB intersections
in the coming year.
Page 4
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
SE
N
m
0
8
2
9
N
m
0
0
3
9
N
m
0
2
3
9
N
m
0
4
3
9
N
m
0
6
3
9
N
m
0
8
3
9
N
m
0
0
4
9
N
m
0
2
4
9
N
m
0
4
4
9
N
m
0
6
4
9
N
m
0
7
4
9
N
m
0
8
4
9
N
m
5
8
4
9
N
m
0
0
5
9
N
m
0
2
5
9
N
m
0
4
5
9
N
m
0
6
5
9
N
m
0
8
5
9
N
m
0
0
6
9
N
m
0
2
6
9
N
m
0
4
6
9
N
m
0
6
6
9
N
m
0
8
6
9
N
m
0
0
7
9
2/5.05
1 0
30
19/9.36
7/6.49
2/19.43
3/5.01
30
2/10.17
30
8/22.58
10/6.05
4/3.41
5/3.58
5/2.76
3/4.14
6/3.92
5/7.52
12/1.81
5/9.60
5/5.25
5/4.12
3/10.57
2/17.88
3
0
0
1
7/2.03
3/3.40
4/2.57
8/3.60
2/8.00
3/5.81
10
2/6.00
11/3.20
17/6.88
23/10.02
6/12.20
7/8.91
7/7.80
6/6.12
8/11.07
13/7.25
1
0
3
0
Base
Weathering
of
NW
N
m
0
2
7
9
-20 RL
-40 RL
-60 RL
-80 RL
30
4/5.95
7/11.45
3/13.70
1
0
4/4.20
8/1.44
13/3.28
14/5.34
5/20.88
6/6.77
F
a
u
l
t
REFERENCE
10
30
7/6.40
N.S.A.
+10 g/t Au x metre intersection
+30 g/t Au x metre intersection
Drill hole pierce point
Intersection (m) / g/t Au
No significant assays
‘Pennys Find Prospect’ - M27/156
LONG SECTION
0
20
40metres
PFD001
0.50/8.11
PFD002
0.60/10.30
PFD003
N.S.A.
8/1.26
?
?
-100 RL
10/1.00
-140 RL
?
-160 RL
-180 RL
-200 RL
-220 RL
-240 RL
?
PFD004
2.00/5.50
?
-40 RL
-60 RL
-80 RL
-100 RL
-120 RL
-140 RL
-160 RL
-180 RL
-200 RL
-220 RL
-240 RL
8m @ 0.54 g/t Au
in RAB hole
18m @ 1.71 g/t Au
in RAB hole
Low-level anomalous
gold values in RAB
holes on contact
Geological
contact trend
Penny’s Find
gold deposit
314,000 tonnes
@ 5.18 g/t Au
Penny’s Find
shear
LEGEND
Sediments and felsic volcanics
Colluvium
Laterite
Dolerite and gabro intrusives
Basalt / andesite
Source:- Dept. of Industry and Resources
‘Penny’s Find project’
MINERALIZED TRENDS
September 2007
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 5
YUINMERY: copper-gold
100% interest
The Yuinmery copper-gold project is 475 kilometres
northeast of Perth,WA and 80 kilometres southwest
of the town of Sandstone. Lying within the Archaean
Youanmi Greenstone Belt, it covers a synclinal
sequence of chloritised felsic tuffaceous rocks with
interbedded sulphide-bearing chert horizons.
Copper-gold mineralisation, previously identified from
a number of prospects at Yuinmery, is VMS in style and
similar in nature to orebodies currently being mined at
Golden Grove and Jaguar in WA. It occurs as massive
sulphides associated with chert exhalite horizons and
as matrix sulphides in lapilli tuff, and is associated with
mafic and ultramafic intrusions. Empire holds 100%
of the Yuinmery project, which comprises 60 square
kilometres of tenements.
During the past year, the Company has completed
three programmes of RC drilling, totalling 46 holes,
for 7,470 metres.Three downhole EM surveys were
undertaken to help identify further drill targets.
Most of the work was undertaken at the Just Desserts
prospect, where drilling outlined two zones of copper-
gold sulphide mineralisation dipping about 60 degrees
to the northeast and plunging 45 degrees to the
southeast. Both have a strike length of 150 metres
and a down plunge extent of at least 250 metres.
In addition, both remain open down plunge to the
southeast and appear to be merging at depth to form
one horizon of about 12 metres true width. Previous
diamond drilling by Western Mining Corporation at
Just Desserts in the mid 1970s intersected both zones
at depth, with hole MYMD18 intersecting 18.2 m
@ 0.93% Cu, 0.52 g/t Au and hole MYMD20
intersecting 7.7 m @ 1.47% Cu, 0.36 g/t Au and
8.5 m @ 1.03% Cu, 0.26 g/t Au.
No drilling below a vertical depth of 250 metres has
yet been undertaken at Just Desserts or elsewhere on
the Yuinmery project, which highlights the potential
for a major discovery within the tenement area.
At Just Desserts,diamond drilling is planned in order
to test the down plunge extensions to both sulphide
zones, as is an initial resource calculation on both the
oxide and fresh mineralisation. Listed below are some
of the better intersections from the drilling at Just
Desserts.
Hole no.
Intersection
YRC08-01
23 m @ 2.68% Cu, 1.28 g/t Au from 80 m
includes 6 m @ 7.42% Cu, 3.01 g/t Au from 85 m
YRC08-02
13 m @ 2.58% Cu, 0.39 g/t Au from 63 m
7 m @ 4.23% Cu, 1.65 g/t Au from 106 m
YRC08-03
13 m @ 2.55% Cu, 1.67 g/t Au from 106 m
YRC08-06
YRC07-14
YRC08-21
7 m @ 1.92% Cu, 0.36 g/t Au from 149 m
14 m @ 2.08% Cu, 0.17 g/t Au from 74 m
6 m @ 4.46% Cu, 0.30 g/t Au from 68 m
8 m @ 2.95% Cu, 3.20 g/t Au from 119 m
includes 4 m @ 4.79% Cu, 3.12 g/t Au from 120 m
YRC08-31
10 m @ 4.23% Cu, 6.01 g/t Au from 123 m
includes 4 m @ 8.62% Cu, 14.08 g/t Au from 124 m
There are a number of other copper-gold prospects
within the Company’s tenements, and initial drilling
has returned encouraging sulphide intersections from
the following.
A Zone:
Trajan:
B Zone:
C Zone:
7 m @ 1.81% Cu, 0.48 g/t Au from 218 m
3 m @ 0.86% Cu, 0.45 g/t Au from 169 m
10 m @ 0.41% Cu, 0.10 g/t Au from 76 m
4 m @ 0.44% Cu, 0.19 g/t Au from 169 m
With a view to future development options,
Empire and Apex have signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (‘MoU’) to enter into commercial
negotiations relating to the Yuinmery project. Apex
owns a processing plant – complete with flotation
circuit – at Youanmi, just 6.5 kilometres southwest of
the Just Desserts prospect. Under the MoU, Empire
and Apex will investigate the possibility of future
development and production at Yuinmery.
Page 6
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
6
8
0
0
0
0
m
E
6
8
5
0
0
0
m
E
E57/767
6
9
0
0
0
0
m
E
0
2km
E57/766
To
Sandstone
6 840 000 mN
JUST DESSERTS
PROSPECT
P57/1214
M57/265
S a n d s t o n e
Road
N e w
t o n e
S a n d s
6 835 000 mN
O ld
o a d
R
P57/1215 P57/1216 P57/1217
Youanmi Minesite
(Apex Minerals)
To
Paynes
Find
E57/735
Empire Resources Ltd. Tenements
‘Yuinmery project’
TENURE MAP
As at August 2008
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 7
6 839 000mN
E
m
0
0
0
6
8
6
E
m
0
0
0
7
8
6
E
m
0
0
0
8
8
6
A Zone
anomaly
M57/265
E
m
0
0
0
9
8
6
E
m
0
0
0
0
9
6
0
Scale
1000 m
6 838 000mN
P57/743
6 837 000mN
P57/744
6 837 000mN
Just Desserts
anomaly
Trajan
anomaly
C Zone
anomaly
P57/745
P57/746
‘Yuinmery Project’
Ground EM anomalies
Channel 30
SW
Surface
Y R C 08-20
Y R C 08-04
Y R C 08-30
Y R C 08-21
NE
D 20
M
Y
M
1.00, 0.13
1
99m
131m
0.59, 0.81
13
0.85, 1.06
10
0.65, 0.05
1
1.32, 0.60
6
0.69, 2.28
3
weathered rock
fresh rock
-50
1.64, 0.30
5
1.61, 0.42
7
gabbro
2.95, 3.20
8
felsic
tuffs
u
p
p
e
r
z
o
n
e
129m
2.20, 0.29
9
165m
l
o
w
e
r
z
o
n
e
sulphide
horizons
0
50metres
-100
-150
-200
-250
1.47, 0.36
7.7
1.03, 0.26
8.5
245m
KEY
2.95, 3.20
8
:
%Cu, g/t Au
metres
‘
’
Yuinmery roject
‘Just Desserts prospect’
CROSS SECTION 9960N
p
Page 8
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
SE
Surface
N
0
8
8
9
N
0
2
9
9
N
0
6
9
9
N
0
0
0
0
1
N
0
4
0
0
1
N
0
9
0
0
1
NW
N
0
3
1
0
1
Weathered Rock
F re s h R o c k
-50
-100
08-05
NSA
5.53
3
07-13
5
1 0
08-27
08-28
1.30
20
1.55
10
08-29
NSA
08-20
08-04
08-30
08-21
Upper and lower zones
have merged
0
1
5
-150
MYMD18
0.93
18.2
10
08-16
08-01
08-02
0.70
23
1.32
6
0.65
3
08-03
08-31
1.61
7
2.95
8
08-18
0.76
5
NSA
2.58
13
2.55
13
0.96
6
08-13
08-06
1.21
16
0.92
1
MYMD15
2.10
3.9
08-14
0.90
2
08-15
NSA
07-14
NSA
08-26
NSA
08-12
0.62
1
MYMD19
NSA
-150
0
50metres
08-06
YRC drill hole number
MYMD20
MYMD18
Western Mining diamond hole
2.20
9
1
0
NSA
% Cu
Drill intersection (m)
% Cu x metres contour
No significant assays
0
1
08-19
NSA
1.47
7.7
5
08-24
NSA
-200
‘
’
Yuinmery roject
‘Just Desserts prospect’
UPPER ZONE LONG SECTION
p
SE
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
N
0
8
8
9
N
0
2
9
9
N
0
6
9
9
N
0
0
0
0
1
N
0
4
0
0
1
N
0
9
0
0
1
N
0
3
1
0
1
NW
Surface
08-27
1.24
4
08-05
1.95
3
08-28
3.12
5
5
07-13
MYMD18
1.82
3
0.93
18.2
08-29
1.02
13
10
Upper and lower zones
have merged
MYMD20
0
50metres
10
08-19
1.03
6
08-16
08-01
08-13
08-06
1.06
16
2.68
23
1.78
10
2.08
14
08-20
08-04
1.00
1
1.64
5
Weathered Rock
Fresh Rock
08-26
1.11
3
07-14
08-12
2.92
10
2.91
6
08-30
08-31
2.20
9
08-02
4.23
10
08-03
08-18
1.03
8.5
5
08-14
08-15
4.23
7
1.92
7
0.68
3
1.03
1
5
0.71
8
MYMD19
NSA
08-06
YRC drill hole number
MYMD18
Western Mining diamond hole
2.20
9
1
0
NSA
% Cu
Drill intersection (m)
% Cu x metres contour
No significant assays
‘
’
Yuinmery roject
‘Just Desserts prospect’
LOWER ZONE LONG SECTION
p
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 9
TORRENS: copper-gold-uranium
100% interest
Empire’s Torrens project lies on the eastern margin of
the Gawler Craton in South Australia, approximately
100 kilometres northeast of Port Augusta.The Gawler
Craton, a recognised world-class IOCG province,
includes the Olympic Dam, Prominent Hill and
Carrapateena deposits.
During October 2007, the Company tested one of the
prominent circular gravity anomalies present within
the project tenements by completing one diamond
hole to a vertical depth of 770 metres.That hole –
which passed through 208 metres of Tertiary cover
rocks, then into a flat-lying sequence of Cambrian
limestones, dolomites and siltstones – had to be
abandoned while still in Cambrian rocks, due to bad
ground conditions. No mineralisation of significance
was logged in the hole.
A number of other prominent circular gravity and
magnetic anomalies remain to be tested on the project
tenements, and Empire is actively seeking a joint-
venture partner with which to undertake further
drilling.
Olympic
Dam
Andamooka
Lyndhurst
Leigh Creek
TORRENS PROJECT
Lake
LaLakkeke
Torrens
enss
TorrTT
Woomera
S
t
u
a
r
t
S O U T H
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
Port Augusta
Hawker
A U S T R A L I A
Quorn
Peterborough
Whyalla
Spencer
Gulf
Port Pirie
Adelaide
200 km
Location of Torrens Project.
Page 10
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
TROY CREEK: copper-gold-platinum
100% interest
Empire’s Troy Creek copper-gold-PGM project
is situated 900 kilometres northeast of Perth and
260 kilometres northeast of Wiluna.The project
tenements cover an area of 522 square kilometres
on the northern margin of the Palaeoproterozoic
Earaheedy Basin. Previous exploration within the
tenements identified multi-element anomalous
geochemistry in sedimentary rocks over a wide-
spread area extending for a strike length of more
than 20 kilometres.Within this area, separate drill
intersections of 1.5 m @ 2.98% Cu, 9.6 m @ 0.34%
Cu, and 8 m @ 0.79 g/t PGM and Au have been
obtained.
During November 2007, a total of eight vertical RC
holes, for a total of 1,063 metres, were drilled to test
seven discrete magnetic and gravity anomalies outlined
during the previous year.
The final metre of a hole drilled to test a magnetic
anomaly numbered TC37 ended in dolomitic graphitic
shale and chert containing 30% pyrite and pyrrhotite
at a depth of 171metres, the limit of the drill rig’s
capability.This final metre assayed only weakly
anomalous gold (69 parts per billion (‘ppb’)) and
palladium (30 ppb); however, the presence of magnetic
pyrrhotite is considered significant, since it may
indicate the presence of a large sulphide body as
the cause of the TC37 magnetic anomaly.
Of the other anomalies, two were shown to be
unmineralised magnetic dolerite and gabbro, while
drilling of the remaining four failed to reach target
depth.
In the coming year, Empire plans to deepen the hole
at anomaly TC37, and also to redrill the other
anomalies.
117°00´
Dampier
120°00´
Ach
123°00´
P I L B A R A
Ach
NIFTY
1.6 Mt Cu
LP
C R A T O N
Paulsens Gold Mine
600,000 ozs
LP
TELFER
24 Moz Au
(1 Mt Cu)
0 200km
A
hs
b
otru
n
Waugh
(Au)
P A R A D I S P R O J E C T
Paraburdoo
SIPA
+1 Moz Au
urtS
larutc
Ilgarari (Cu)
T R O Y C R E E K
P R O J E C T
N
22°00´
Exmouth
Mt Clement
70,000 ozs Au
24°00´
Granite outcrops
Archaean
Lower Proterozoic
Ach
LP
Magnetic linear
Fault
Mine
Prospect
Tenements
PLUTONIC
6.8 Moz Au
Ach
Y I L G A R N
C R A T O N
Ach
LP
Location of Troy Creek and Paradis Project.
E
A
R
A
H
E
E
D
Corrid
or
Y
B
A
S
I
N
LP
Ach
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 11
LARKIN’S FIND: nickel-gold
Earning an 80% interest
Empire has entered into a farm-in and joint venture of
the Larkin’s Find nickel and gold project whereby it
may earn an 80% interest in a lateritic nickel resource
with additional untested gold potential.The Larkin’s
Find nickel and gold project – covering an area of
approximately 33 square kilometres – is situated
approximately 85 kilometres southeast of the Murrin
Murrin Nickel Mine and 155 kilometres north-
northeast of Kalgoorlie in WA.
Previous exploration in the Larkin’s Find area located
widespread lateritic nickel-cobalt mineralisation.That
work outlined an inferred resource of 5.2 million
tonnes assaying 0.8% nickel and 0.08% cobalt using a
0.6% nickel cut-off grade. Additional untested areas
with further exploration potential were identified.
In July 2008, a small aircore (‘AC’) drilling programme
undertaken to verify the previous nickel exploration
confirmed the earlier work, with intersections such as
12 m @ 0.71% Ni, 0.18% Co; 11 m @ 1.04% Ni,
0.10% Co, and 11 m @ 1.13% Ni, 0.12% Co.
The Company believes that the Larkin’s Find project
area is under-explored for nickel and has seen only
minimal previous exploration for gold. Programmes to
test both the gold and nickel potential of the project
are planned for the coming year. Exploration for gold
will target northeast trending splay structures that
strike from a regionally extensive northwest trending
structure known as the Claypan Fault.This fault and
structural zone hosts gold mineralisation approximately
3 kilometres north of the tenement boundary at
Gardner’s Find.
Future nickel exploration will be directed towards
drilling untested targets to increase the size of the
resource.
Page 12
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
YARLARWEELOR: uranium
100% interest
The Yarlarweelor uranium project, which is located
125 kilometres north of Meekatharra in WA, covers an
area of 492 square kilometres.
In February 2008, the Company agreed to sell the
Yarlarweelor project to Perth-based Radon Resources
(‘Radon’), the sale being conditional upon Radon
being admitted to the official list of the ASX within
the 6-month option period. Subsequent to the end of
the reporting year, Radon notified Empire that it
would not be proceeding with the purchase, due to
unfavourable market conditions.
During April 2008, a detailed airborne radiometric and
magnetic survey completed over the eastern half of the
project area outlined numerous strong uranium
anomalies overlying Proterozoic schists and Archaean
granites and gneisses. In the 1980s, a number of these
anomalies were drilled by previous explorers, with
intersections up to 24 m @ 310 parts per million
(‘ppm’) uranium and 2 m @ 630 ppm uranium.
Empire proposes to drill-test the strongest uranium
anomalies during the coming year.
E52/2095
E52/2095
7 180 000 mN
6
2
0
0
0
0
m
E
0
2 km
Yarlarweelor airborne radiometric and magnetic survey.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 13
NOONDIE: uranium
100% interest
The Noondie project comprises two exploration
licences prospective for palaeochannel calcrete type
uranium deposits.The licences are located on the
margin of Lake Noondie, between 30 and 65
kilometres southeast and east of the Company’s
Yuinmery project and approximately 100 kilometres
south of the town of Sandstone. Lake Noondie is a
large Tertiary-Recent drainage system extending
almost 100 kilometres in length and up to
25 kilometres in width.
The exploration licences cover isolated airborne
radiometric anomalies first identified in 1968. One
covers the confluence of two palaeochannel drainage
systems and represents a favourable location for the
deposition and accumulation of uranium minerals.
Field inspection confirmed that the aerial anomalies
are sourced from the drainage system and not the
basement granite rocks that were the original source
of uranium minerals. No previously recorded ground
exploration has been undertaken within the licence
areas, despite the fact that potentially economic
uranium mineralisation has been drilled elsewhere
within Lake Noondie.
The Company plans to carry out ground-based
radiometric surveys to pinpoint drilling targets.
Page 14
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
PARADIS: gold-platinum
100% interest
Empire’s Paradis project, located 25 kilometres west
of Paraburdoo in WA, contains late Archaean rocks on
the southern margin of the Pilbara Craton.The project
area, comprising two exploration licences, covers an
area of 230 square kilometres.The Paradis Project is
situated within the major west-northwest/east-
southeast structural corridor (also known as the
Ashburton Structural Corridor) that hosts the Mount
Olympus,Waugh and Paulsens deposits; these contain a
combined total in excess of 1 million ounces of gold.
While there has been no recorded drilling within the
project area, rock-chip samples taken by previous
explorers assayed up to 0.31 g/t PGM and gold, as
well as widespread anomalous gold and platinum
values in stream sediments.
Empire intends to carry out surface- and stream-
sediment geochemical sampling, which will be
followed by drill-testing of any targets identified.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 15
5 .
C O R P O R AT E G O V E R N A N C E P R I N C I P L E S
(b)
Principle 2 Recommendations 2.1
To the extent that they are applicable, and given its
circumstances, the Company adopts the Eight Essential
Corporate Governance Principles and Best Practice
Recommendations (‘Recommendations’) published by
the Corporate Governance Council of the ASX.
As the Company’s activities develop in size, nature and
scope, the size of the Board and the implementation
of additional corporate governance structures will be
afforded further consideration.
The Board sets out below its ‘If not, why not?’ report
in relation to matters of corporate governance in
which the Company’s practices depart from the
Recommendations.
(a)
Principle 1 Recommendation 1.1
Notification of Departure
Empire has not formally disclosed the functions
reserved to the Board and those delegated to
management.The appointment of non-executive
directors to the Board is not formalised in writing by
way of a letter or other agreement.
Explanation for Departure
The Board recognises the importance of distinguishing
between the respective roles and responsibilities of the
Board and management.The Board has established an
informal framework for the management of the
Company and the roles and responsibilities of its Board
and management. Due to the small size of the Board
and of the Company, the Board does not consider it
necessary to formally document the roles of Board and
management, as it believes these roles are being carried
out in practice and are clearly understood by all
members of the Board and management.The Board is
responsible for the strategic direction of the Company,
establishing goals for management and monitoring the
achievement of these goals, monitoring the overall
corporate governance of the Company and ensuring
that shareholder value is increased.The Company has
two executives, being the managing director and an
executive director.The managing director is
responsible for ensuring that the Company achieves
the goals established by the Board.
The appointments of non-executive directors are
formalised in accordance with the regulatory
requirements and the Company’s constitution.
Notification of departure
The Company does not have a majority of
independent directors, with only one of the three
Board members being independent.
Explanation for departure
The Board considers that the current composition of
the Board is adequate for the Company’s size and
operations at present, and includes an appropriate mix
of skills and expertise relevant to the Company’s
business.The current Board structure presently consists
of the non-executive chairman, the managing director
and one executive director, only one of whom is
independent.The Company considers that each of the
directors possesses skills and experience suitable for
building the Company.The Board takes the
responsibilities of best practice in corporate
governance seriously. It is the Board’s intention to
appoint another independent director as and when the
size and complexity of the Company’s operations
changes and a suitable candidate is identified.
(c)
Principle 2 Recommendation 2.4 and Principle 4
Recommendations 4.1
Notification of Departure
Separate audit and nomination committees have not
been formed.
Explanation for Departure
The Board considers that the Company is not
currently of a size, or its affairs of such complexity, that
the formation of separate or special committees is
justified at this time.The Board as a whole is able to
address the governance aspects of the full scope of the
Company’s activities and ensure that it adheres to
appropriate ethical standards.
In particular, the Board as a whole considers those
matters that would usually be the responsibility of an
audit committee and a nomination committee.The
Board considers that, at this stage, no efficiencies or
other benefits would be gained by establishing a
separate audit committee or a separate nomination
committee.
(d)
Principle 2 Recommendation 2.5
Notification of Departure
The Company does not have in place a formal process
for evaluation of the Board, its committees, individual
directors and key executives.
Explanation for Departure
Evaluation of the Board is carried out on a continuing
and informal basis.The Company will put a formal
process in place as and when the level of operations
of the Company justifies this.
Page 16
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
(e)
Principle 3 Recommendation 3.1
(h)
Principle 7 Recommendation 7.1
Notification of Departure
The Company has not established a formal code
of conduct.
Explanation for Departure
The Board considers that its business practices, as
determined by the Board and key executives, are the
equivalent of a code of conduct.
(f)
Principle 5 Recommendation 5.1
Notification of Departure
The Company has not established written policies and
procedures designed to ensure compliance with ASX
Listing Rule disclosure requirements and
accountability for compliance.
Explanation for Departure
The directors have a long history of involvement with
public listed companies and are familiar with the
disclosure requirements of the ASX Listing Rules.
The Company has in place informal procedures that it
believes are sufficient for ensuring compliance with
ASX Listing Rule disclosure requirements and
accountability for compliance.The Board has
nominated the managing director and the company
secretary as being responsible for all matters relating to
disclosure.
(g)
Principle 6 Recommendation 6.1
Notification of Departure
The Company has not established a formal shareholder
communication strategy.
Explanation for Departure
While the Company has not established a formal
shareholder communication strategy, it actively
communicates with its shareholders in order to
identify their expectations, and actively promotes
shareholder involvement in the Company. It achieves
this by posting on its website copies of all information
lodged with the ASX. Shareholders with internet
access are encouraged to provide their email addresses
in order to receive electronic copies of information
distributed by the Company. Alternatively, hard copies
of information distributed by the Company are
available on request.
Notification of Departure
The Company has an informal risk oversight and
management policy and an internal compliance and
control system.
Explanation for Departure
The Board does not currently have formal procedures
in place but is aware of the various risks that affect the
Company and its particular business. Section 8 of the
prospectus dated 7 November 2006 provides a
summary of the relevant risk factors that may affect
the Company. As the Company develops, the Board
will develop appropriate procedures to deal with risk
oversight and management and internal compliance,
taking into account the size of the Company and the
stage of development of its projects.
(i)
Principle 8 Recommendations 8.1
Notification of departure
The Company does not have a formal remuneration
policy and has not established a separate remuneration
committee. Non-executive directors may receive
options or shares.
Explanation for Departure
The current remuneration of the directors is disclosed
in the Directors’ Report. Non-executive directors
receive a fixed fee for their services and may also
receive options or shares.The issue of options or shares
to non-executive directors may be an appropriate
method of providing sufficient incentive and reward
while maintaining cash reserves.
Due to the Company’s early stage of development and
its small size, it does not consider that a separate
remuneration committee would add any efficiency to
the process of determining the levels of remuneration
for the directors and key executives.The Board
believes it is more appropriate to set aside time at
specified Board meetings each year to specifically
address matters that would ordinarily fall to a
remuneration committee. In addition, all matters of
remuneration will continue to be in accordance with
regulatory requirements, especially in respect of related
party transactions; that is, none of the directors will
participate in any deliberations regarding their own
remuneration or related issues.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 17
6 .
D I R E C T O R S ’ R E P O R T
Your directors submit their report on Empire
Resources Limited and its controlled entities for the
financial year ended 30 June 2008.
DIRECTORS
The Company’s directors in office during the financial
period and until the date of this report are as follows
(directors were in office for the entire period unless
otherwise stated).
Adrian Griffin
Chairman (Non–Executive)
BSc., MAusIMM
Mr Griffin graduated from the University of
Melbourne in 1975 and is a member of the
Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
(‘AusIMM’) and the Geological Society of Australia.
He began his professional career with exploration for
base metals in Tasmania, and went on to develop mine
planning, grade control and exploration methods in
iron ore with BHP.
In the 1980s, Mr Griffin was operations manager for a
number of public companies involved in the mining
and production of gold and base metals throughout
Australia and southeast Asia. In 1988, he managed the
commissioning of underground production at the
Bellevue gold mine in Western Australia.
Mr Griffin began consulting to the mining industry in
1990 and has held board positions with a number of
public companies since then. His management
experience is broad, encompassing as it does
exploration, financing, development, commissioning
and the production of a wide range of mineral
commodities.
Mr Griffin has been a director of the following listed
companies during the past 3 years.
Company
Dwyka Resources Ltd
Position
Non-executive director
Appointed
1/12/2005
Northern Uranium Ltd
Non-executive director
12/06/2006
Empire Resources Ltd
Hodges Resources Ltd
Chairman
3/02/2004
Managing director
17/08/2005
Reedy Lagoon Corporation Ltd Non-executive director
9/05/2007
Washington Resources Ltd
Managing director
7/09/2004
Page 18
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
David Sargeant
Managing director
BSc. MAusIMM
Adrian Jessup
Executive director
BSc. MAusIMM
Mr Sargeant – who holds a Bachelor of Science
degree in economic geology from the University of
Sydney – has more than 35 years’ experience as a
geologist, consultant and company director. As such, he
has been involved in numerous mineral exploration,
ore deposit evaluation and mining development
projects and is a member of AusIMM and the
Geological Society of Australia.
During his career, Mr Sargeant has held a range of
senior positions, including that of senior geologist with
Newmont Pty Ltd and senior supervisory geologist
with Esso Australia Ltd at the time of the Harbour
Lights Gold Mine discovery and development. Further,
Mr Sargeant was the first chief geologist at the Telfer
gold mine during exploration, development and
production at that project. In addition, he was
exploration manager for the Adelaide Petroleum NL
group of companies, manager of resources
development for Sabminco NL and a technical
director of Western Reefs Ltd during the period in
which that company became a successful producer at
the Dalgaranga Gold Project.
Mr Jessup also holds a Bachelor of Science degree
(with honours) in economic geology from the
University of Sydney and has more than 35 years’
continuous experience as a geologist, company
director and consultant involved in mineral
exploration, ore deposit evaluation and mining. He is
a member of AusIMM, the Geological Society of
Australia and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
For the last 12 years, Mr Jessup has operated a
geological consulting company. During that time, he
was a founding director of Sylvania Resources Ltd and
remained on the board for 2 years. Prior to that, Mr
Jessup was managing director of Giralia Resources NL
for 8 years, from the company’s inception in 1987.
Previously, he had worked for AMAX Exploration
Inc., as a senior geologist and as regional manager in
charge of that company’s mineral exploration in WA.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 19
MANAGEMENT
Simon Storm
Company secretary
BCom. BCompt(Hons) CA FCIS
Mr Storm is a Chartered Accountant with more than
20 years of Australian and international experience in
the accounting profession and commerce. He
commenced his career with Deloitte Haskins & Sells
in Africa, then London, before joining Price
Waterhouse in Perth.
Mr Storm has held various senior finance and/or
company secretarial roles with both listed and unlisted
entities in the banking, resources, construction,
telecommunications and property development
industries. In the last 5 years, he has provided
consulting services covering accounting, financial and
company secretarial matters to various companies in
these sectors.
David Ross
Exploration Manager
BSc.(Hons) MSc. MAusIMM
Mr Ross holds a Bachelor of Science degree (with
honours) in geology from Aberdeen University,
Scotland and a Master of Science degree in economic
geology from McMaster University in Canada. He is a
member of AusIMM, the Geological Society of
Australia and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.
With more than 20 years’ experience as an exploration
geologist in Western Australia, Mr Ross’ career has seen
him involved with numerous mineral exploration, ore
deposit evaluation and mine development projects for
both gold and base metals. He has held senior
geologist positions with Brunswick NL and Giralia
Resources and was geological superintendent for
Australian Resources at the Gidgee gold mine. Most
recently, Mr Ross held the position of chief geologist
with De Grey Mining Ltd, where he was instrumental
in the discovery of the Orchard Well VMS deposits.
Principal Activities
During the period, the principal activities of the
Company consisted of mineral exploration and
evaluation of properties in Australia.There has been
no significant change in these activities during the
financial period.
Dividends
Result for the Financial Period
Loss from ordinary activities after income tax expense
was $3,713,015 (2007: $3,580,357).
Review of Operations
In the 17 months since listing on the Australian
Securities Exchange, Empire Resources has maintained
a high level of exploration work completing ten
separate drilling programmes at Penny’s Find,
Yuinmery,Torrens and Troy Creek. During the
12 months ended 30 June 2008 the company spent
$2,575,000 (2007: $778,000) on exploration and
evaluation.
In addition, geophysical surveys comprising magnetics,
electromagnetics, gravity and radiometrics have been
completed at the Yuinmery,Torrens,Yarlarweelor and
Troy Creek projects to help accurately define drill
targets.
As a result of this work the Company has been
successful in defining a 52,000 ounce gold resource at
Penny’s Find and discovering significant copper – gold
mineralization at the Yuinmery project.
Significant changes in the state of affairs of the
Company during the financial year were as follows.
Exercised an option to acquire the Penny’s Find
gold project near Kalgoorlie, a high-grade gold
project with an existing resource, with the issue of
1,000,000 ordinary shares to Rubystar Nominees
Pty Ltd
Agreement to sell the Yarlarweelor uranium project
in WA for $1.75 million, comprising $1.0 million
in cash and $750,000 worth of fully paid ordinary
shares in Radon Resources Limited. At 30 June
2008, certain conditions precedent to the
finalisation of this agreement had not occurred,
and on 25 August 2008 the arrangement was
terminated.Therefore, the transaction is not
reflected in these accounts.
Consideration of $150,000 to private investor,
Meekal Pty Ltd, to purchase the remaining 10%
that it did not own of the Yuinmery copper-gold
project.
Change in accounting policy to write off
exploration, evaluation and acquisition costs in the
year they are incurred.This resulted in a write-off
of $4,403,560 against opening retained earnings
and $3,324,163 was expensed in the current year.
No dividends have been paid during the period and
no dividends have been recommended by the
directors.
In the opinion of the directors, there were no other
significant changes in the state of affairs of the
Company.
Remuneration Report (Audited)
This report details the amount and nature of
remuneration of each director of the Company and
the executives receiving the highest remuneration.
Page 20
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Remuneration Policy
The principles used to determine the nature and
amount of remuneration are applied through a
remuneration policy which ensures that the
remuneration package properly reflects the person’s
duties and responsibilities, and that the remuneration is
competitive in attracting, retaining and motivating
people of the highest quality.
The remuneration policy, setting the terms and
conditions for the executive directors, has been
developed by the Board after seeking professional
advice and taking into account market conditions and
comparable salary levels for companies of a similar size
and operating in similar sectors.
The remuneration policy is to provide a fixed
remuneration component.The Board believes that this
remuneration policy is appropriate given the stage of
development of the Company and the activities which
it undertakes, and is also appropriate in aligning the
directors’ objectives with shareholder and businesses
objectives.
The remuneration framework has regard to
shareholders’ interests in the following ways.
It focuses on sustained growth, as well as focusing
the directors on key non-financial drivers of value.
It attracts and retains directors of a high calibre.
The remuneration framework has regard to directors’
interests in the following ways.
It rewards capability and experience.
It reflects competitive reward for contributions to
shareholder growth.
It provides a clear structure for earning rewards.
It provides recognition for contribution.
Non–executive directors
The Board’s policy is to remunerate non-executive
directors at market rates for comparable companies
for time, commitment and responsibilities.The Board
determines payments to the non-executive directors
and reviews their remuneration annually, based on
market practice, duties and accountability. Independent
external advice is sought when required.The
maximum aggregate amount of fees that can be paid
to directors is subject to approval by shareholders at a
general meeting. Fees for non-executive directors are
not linked to the performance of the economic entity.
However, to align directors’ interests with shareholder
interests, the directors are encouraged to hold shares in
the Company and may receive options.
The directors have resolved that non-executive
directors’ fees will be $30,000 per annum for the
chairman, inclusive of statutory superannuation
contributions. Shareholders have approved aggregate
remuneration for all non-executive directors at an
amount of $100,000 per annum. Where applicable,
superannuation contributions of 9% are paid on these
fees, as required by law.
Share-based Compensation (Audited)
To ensure that the Company has appropriate
mechanisms to continue to attract and retain the
services of directors and employees of a high calibre,
the Company has established the Empire Resources
Limited Share Plan (‘SP’).
The directors consider that the SP is an appropriate
method to:
a) reward directors and employees for their past
performance;
b) provide long-term incentives to participate in the
Company’s future growth;
c) motivate directors and employees and generate
employee loyalty, and
d) assist in retaining the services of valuable employees.
In all, 2,450,000 shares were issued to directors and
employees under the SP during the year at an issue
price of $0.188. Interest-free loans were provided for
the amount payable in respect of the shares, with the
amount repayable being the lesser of the issue price
and the last sale price of shares on the repayment date.
The shares issued under the SP may not be transferred
or otherwise dealt with, and will not be quoted on
ASX, until any loan in respect of the shares has been
repaid and a period of 36 months after the date of
issue has elapsed.The fair value of the shares, using a
Black and Scholes pricing model, is recognised as an
expense over the period from date of issue to vesting
date.The amount recognised as part of employee
expenses during the half-year was $18,954.
The terms and conditions of each share affecting
reported remuneration in the previous, this or future
reporting periods are as follows.
Issue
date
12 May
2008
Expiry
date
12 May
2011
Exercise
price
Value per option
Date
at grant date exercisable
$0.188
$0.139
12 May
2008
Fair values at issue date are determined using a Black-
Scholes option pricing model that takes into account
the exercise price, the term of the loan, the share price
at issue date and the expected price volatility of the
underlying share, and the risk-free rate for the term of
the option.
The model inputs for options granted during the year
ended 30 June 2008 included the following.
(a) Loans to acquire shares are granted for no
consideration and vest between issue date and
36 months.
(b) An expected price volatility of 114%.
(c) A risk-free interest rate of 7%.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 21
Shares issued Shares issued Shares vested Shares vested
during the year during the year
for the year
ended
30-Jun-08
for the year
ended
30-Jun-07
year ended
30-Jun-08
year ended
30-Jun-07
Specified directors
Non-executive
Mr A Griffin
Executive
Mr D Sargeant
Mr A Jessup
Specified executives
Mr S Storm
Directors
Mr A Griffin
Mr D Sargeant
Mr A Jessup
Specified executives
Mr S Storm
Directors
Mr A Griffin
Mr D Sargeant
Mr A Jessup
Specified executives
Mr S Storm
500,000
750,000
500,000
350,000
–
–
–
–
500,000
750,000
500,000
350,000
–
–
–
–
Year granted
Vested
%
Forfeited
%
Financial
years in
which
shares may
vest
Minimum
total value
of grant yet
to vest
$
Maximum
total value
of grant yet
to vest
$
2007
2007
2007
2007
6%
6%
6%
6%
–
–
–
–
2008-11
2008-11
2008-11
3,868
5,802
3,868
65,759
98,639
65,759
2008-11
2,708
46,031
A
Remuneration
consisting of
shares
B
Value at
issue date
$
Shares
C
Value at
exercise date
$
D
Value at
lapse date
$
E
Total of
columns B-D
$
11%
4%
3%
6%
69,627
104,441
69,627
48,739
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
69,627
104,441
69,627
48,739
A = the percentage of the value of remuneration
consisting of shares, based on the value of options
expensed during the current year
B = the value at issue date calculated in accordance
with AASB 2 Share-based Payment of shares issued
during the year as part of remuneration.
C = the value at exercise date of shares that were
issued as part of remuneration and were exercised
during the year, being the intrinsic value of the
options at that date
D = the value at lapse date of shares that were issued
as part of remuneration and that lapsed during the
year. Lapsed shares refers to shares that vested but
expired due to the term of the loan expiring.
Page 22
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Executives
Executive directors receive either a salary plus
superannuation guarantee contributions as required by
law, currently set at 9%, or provide their services via a
consultancy arrangement. Directors do not receive any
retirement benefits. Individuals may, however, choose
to sacrifice part of their salary to increase payments
towards superannuation. Options are not issued as part
of remuneration for long-term incentives.
All remuneration paid to directors and executives is
valued at cost to the Company and expensed.
Compensation of Key Management Personnel for
the Year Ended 30 June 2008.
The following table discloses the remuneration of the
key management personnel (directors and executive
officers) of the Company.The information in this table
is audited.
Directors
Specified directors
Non–executive
Mr A Griffin
Executive
Mr D Sargeant
Mr A Jessup
Total specified
Specified executives
Mr S Shah – company
secretary to 30 April 07
Mr S Storm – company
secretary from 30 April 07
Total specified
Directors’
fees
Consulting
fees
Short–term employment
benefits
benefits
Post-
2008
2007
2008
2007
2008
2007
2008
2007
2008
2007
2008
2007
2008
2007
30,000
12,500
–
–
–
–
–
–
30,000
12,500
–
–
–
–
–
–
125,000
50,000
125,000
50,000
250,000
100,000
–
30,960
45,600
8,100
45,600
39,060
30,000
12,500
125,000
50,000
125,000
50,000
280,000
112,500
–
30,960
45,600
8,100
45,600
39,060
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Share-
based
payments
Value
of options
3,868
–
5,802
–
3,868
–
13,539
–
–
–
2,708
–
2,708
–
Total
33,868
12,500
130,802
50,000
128,868
50,000
293,539
112,500
–
30,960
48,308
8,100
48,308
39,060
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 23
Employment Contracts
Mr D Sargeant
By agreement dated 24 October 2006, the Company
and Kirkdale Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 009 096 388)
(‘Kirkdale’) agreed the terms and conditions under
which Kirkdale would provide the services of Mr
Sargeant as managing director of the Company.
The agreement:
(a) has a term of 3 years;
(b)requires the payment to Kirkdale of a fee of
$10,000 per month (increasing by 10% each year)
and reimbursement of expenses;
(c) contains provisions requiring the payment of a
termination benefit of 50% of the amount due on
termination of the agreement.
Mr A Jessup
By agreement dated 24 October 2006, the Company
and Murilla Exploration Pty Ltd (ACN 068 277 190)
(‘Murilla’) agreed the terms and conditions under
which Murilla would provide the services of Mr Jessup
as an executive officer of the Company.
The agreement:
(a) has a term of 3 years;
(b)requires the payment to Murilla of a fee of $10,000
per month (increasing by 10% each year) and
reimbursement of expenses;
(c) contains provisions requiring the payment of a
termination benefit of 50% of the amount due on
termination of the agreement.
Directors may be paid additional fees for special duties
or services outside the scope of the ordinary duties of
a director. Directors will also be reimbursed for all
reasonable expenses incurred in the course of their
duties.
Directors’ Interest
The relevant interest of each director in the shares and
options over shares issued by the Company at the date
of this report is as follows.
Number of
Ordinary shares
Number of
Options
Director
Direct
Indirect
Direct
Indirect
Mr A Griffin
500,000
–
300,000
–
Mr D Sargeant
– 5,850,000
– 2,849,999
Mr A Jessup
722,222 1,245,333
361,111
822,666
Company Performance
Comments on performance are set out in the review
of operations.
Significant Changes in the State of Affairs
There were no significant changes in the state of affairs
of the Company, other than those noted in the review
of operations.
Likely Developments and Expected Results
Disclosure of likely developments in the operations
of the Company and the expected results of those
operations in future financial years, and any further
information, has not been included in this report
because, in the reasonable opinion of the directors, to
do so would be likely to prejudice the business
activities of the Company.
Environmental Regulation
The Company’s operations were subject to
environmental regulations under both Commonwealth
and State legislation in relation to its exploration
activities.
The directors are not aware of any breaches during the
period covered by this report.
Share Options
Meetings of Directors
At the date of this report, unissued ordinary shares of
the Company under option are as follows.
Grant
date
19 Jun 07
1 Feb 07
Date of
expiry
30 Jun 09
31 Dec 10
Exercise
price ($)
Number under
option
0.25
0.25
27,709,075
3,000,000
30,709,075
The following table sets out the number of meetings
of the Company’s directors held during the period
ended 30 June 2008 and the number of meetings
attended by each director.
Directors’ meetings
Director
Mr A Griffin
Mr D Sargeant
Mr A Jessup
A
5
5
5
A = meetings attended
B = meetings held whilst a director
B
5
5
5
As at the date of this report the Company has not
formed any committees, as the directors consider that
at present the size of the Company does not warrant
such. Audit, corporate governance, director nomination
and remuneration matters are all handled by the full
Board.
Page 24
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Proceedings on Behalf of the Company
No person has applied to the Court under Section
237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring
proceedings on behalf of the Company, or to intervene
in any proceedings to which the Company is a party,
for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of
the Company for all or part of the proceedings.
No proceedings have been brought or intervened in
on behalf of the Company with leave of the Court
under Section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001.
Indemnification and Insurance of
Directors and Officers
Indemnification
The Company has agreed to indemnify current
directors and officers and past directors and officers
against all liabilities to another person (other than the
Company or a related body corporate), including legal
expenses that may arise from their position as directors
and officers of the Company and its controlled
entities, except where the liability arises out of
conduct involving a lack of good faith. The agreement
stipulates that the Company will meet the full amount
of any such liabilities, including costs and expenses.
Insurance
The directors have not included details of the amount
of the premium paid in respect of the directors’ and
officers’ liability insurance contracts, as such disclosure
is prohibited under the terms of the contract.
Events subsequent to reporting date
On 3 July 2008, the Company placed 5 million shares
at 17 cents per share with Apex Resources Ltd to raise
AU$850,000.The funds raised will be used to progress
exploration of VMS style copper-gold occurrences
within Empire’s Yuinmery tenements, including
diamond drilling to test down plunge extensions of
mineralised zones identified at Just Desserts, and an
initial resource calculation.
The agreement to sell the Yarlarweelor uranium
project in WA for $1.75 million was terminated on
25 August 2008.
Other than that no matter or circumstance has arisen,
since the end of the financial year, which significantly
affected, or may significantly affect, the operations of
the consolidated entity, the results of those operations,
or the state of affairs of the consolidated entity in
subsequent financial years.
Non-audit Services
The Company may decide to employ the auditor on
assignments additional to its statutory audit duties
where the auditor’s expertise and experience with the
Company and/or the consolidated entity are
important.
Details of the amounts paid or payable to the auditor
(RSM Bird Cameron) for audit and non-audit services
provided during the year are set out below.
The Board has considered the position and is satisfied
that the provision of the non-audit services is
compatible with the general standard of independence
for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001.
The directors are satisfied that the provision of non-
audit services by the auditor, as set out below, did not
compromise the auditor independence requirements of
the Corporations Act 2001 for the following reasons.
• All non-audit services have been reviewed by the
Board to ensure they do not impact the impartiality
and objectivity of the auditor.
• None of the services undermine the general
principles relating to auditor independence as set
out in Professional Statement FI, including
reviewing or auditing the auditor’s own work,
acting in a management or a decision-making
capacity for the Company, acting as advocate for the
Company or jointly sharing economic risks and
rewards.
During the period, the following fees were paid or
payable for services provided by the auditor of the
parent entity RSM Bird Cameron, its related practices
and non-related audit firms.
Consolidated
Year ended
30 June 2008
$
Year ended
30 June 2007
$
Assurance Services
1. Audit services
Audit and review of financial
reports and other audit work
under the Corporations Act 2001
Total remuneration for
audit services
2. Other assurance services
Tax-related
Prospectus-related
Total remuneration for other
assurance services
Total remuneration for
assurance services
20,350
20,350
6,710
–
6,710
6,050
6,050
3,300
8,250
11,550
27,060
17,600
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 requires the
Company’s auditor, RSM Bird Cameron, to provide
the directors with a written Independence Declaration
in relation to its audit of the financial report for the
year ended 30 June 2008. This written Auditor’s
Independence Declaration is attached to the Auditor’s
Independent Audit Report to the members and forms
part of this Director’s Report.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of directors.
D Sargeant
Managing Director
Perth,Western Australia
19 September 2008
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 25
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
7 . I N C O M E S TAT E M E N T F O R T H E Y E A R E N D E D 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
Revenue
Other income
Depreciation expense
Exploration expense
Impairment of non-currents assets
Impairment of receivable
Employee benefits expense
Management fee expense
Accounting expense
Consultancy expense
Share-based payment
ASX expense
Corporate relations expense
Insurance expense
Other expenses
Loss before income tax
Income tax expense
Note
2
2
3
3
3
7
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
177,529
111,237
2007
$
130,155
–
2008
$
2007
$
177,529
111,237
130,155
–
(23,919)
(5,422)
(23,919)
(5,422)
(3,324,163)
(3,346,450)
(2,638,454)
(2,171,728)
–
(80,000)
(14,606)
–
–
(52,742)
(1,860,431)
(80,000)
(14,606)
–
–
(52,742)
(228,693)
(100,000)
(228,693)
(100,000)
(45,600)
(14,110)
(18,954)
(47,251)
(25,345)
(28,252)
(150,888)
(38,281)
(30,640)
–
(13,825)
(29,804)
(2,097)
(91,251)
(45,600)
(14,110)
(18,954)
(47,251)
(25,345)
(28,252)
(150,888)
(38,281)
(30,640)
–
(13,825)
(29,804)
(2,097)
(91,251)
(3,713,015)
(3,580,357)
(4,887,737)
(2,405,635)
4
–
–
–
–
Loss attributable to members of the parent entity
(3,713,015)
(3,580,357)
(4,887,737)
(2,405,635)
Basic and diluted loss per share (cents per share)
5
(6.00)
( 10.21)
The above Income Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
Page 26
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
8 . B A L A N C E S H E E T A S AT 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Total Current Assets
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Trade and other receivables
Financial assets
Plant and equipment
Total Non-current Assets
TOTAL ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables
Total Current Liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Issued capital
Reserves
Accumulated losses
TOTAL EQUITY
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
Note
6
7
7
8
9
10
11
12
1,361,273
4,327,553
1,361,213
4,327,493
67,899
134,903
67,899
134,903
1,429,172
4,462,456
1,429,112
4,462,396
–
–
82,605
82,605
–
–
64,293
64,293
–
–
82,605
82,605
74,722
1,100,000
64,293
1,239,015
1,511,777
4,526,749
1,511,717
5,701,411
525,604
525,604
521,265
521,265
524,754
524,754
520,415
520,415
525,604
521,265
524,754
520,415
986,173
4,005,484
986,963
5,180,996
9,420,471
8,745,721
9,420,471
8,745,721
511,541
492,587
511,541
492,587
(8,945,839)
(5,232,824)
(8,945,049)
(4,057,312)
986,173
4,005,484
986,963
5,180,996
The above Balance Sheet should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 27
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
9 . S TAT E M E N T O F C H A N G E S I N E Q U I T Y F O R T H E Y E A R E N D E D 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
Consolidated group
Share capital
Accumulated
ordinary
$
Losses
$
Option
Reserve
$
Note
Balance at 1 July 2006
Retrospective adjustment upon change in
1,518,700
(594,527)
accounting policy for exploration expenditure
20
–
(1,057,940)
Shares issued during the year
Options issued during the year
Equity issue expenses
7,925,483
–
(698,462)
–
–
–
–
–
–
509,591
(17,004)
Total
$
924,173
(1,057,940)
7,925,483
509,591
(715,466)
Loss attributable to members of the parent entity
–
(3,580,357)
–
(3,580,357)
Balance at 30 June 2007
8,745,721
(5,232,824)
492,587
4,005,484
Balance at 1 July 2007
Shares issued during the year
Options issued during the year
Loss attributable to members of the parent entity
8,745,721
(5,232,824)
492,587
4,005,484
674,750
–
–
–
–
–
18,954
674,750
18,954
(3,713,015)
–
(3,713,015)
Balance at 30 June 2008
9,420,471
(8,945,839)
511,541
986,173
Parent entity
Share capital
Accumulated
ordinary
$
Losses
$
Option
Reserve
$
Note
Balance at 1 July 2006
Retrospective adjustment upon change in
1,518,700
(593,737)
accounting policy for exploration expenditure
20
–
(1,057,940)
Shares issued during the year
Options issued during the year
Equity issue expenses
Loss attributable to members of the parent entity
7,925,483
–
–
–
(698,462)
–
–
(2,405,635)
–
–
–
509,591
(17,004)
–
Total
$
924,963
(1,057,940)
7,925,483
509,591
(715,466)
(2,405,635)
Balance at 30 June 2007
8,745,721
(4,057,312)
492,587
5,180,996
Balance at 1 July 2007
Shares issued during the year
Options issued during the year
Loss attributable to members of the parent entity
8,745,721
(4,057,312)
492,587
5,180,996
674,750
–
–
–
–
(4,887,737)
–
18,954
–
674,750
18,954
(4,887,737)
Balance at 30 June 2008
9,420,471
(8,945,049)
511,541
986,963
The above Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes
Page 28
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
1 0 . C A S H F L O W S TAT E M E N T F O R T H E Y E A R E N D E D 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
Note
Activities
Receipts from customers
Payments to suppliers and employees
Interest received
31,237
–
(558,050)
(308,686)
177,476
130,155
31,237
(558,050)
177,476
–
(308,686)
130,155
Net cash used in operating activities
19 (i)
(349,337)
(178,531)
(349,337)
(178,531)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Payment for renewal or purchase of prospects
Loans – payments made
(42,231)
–
–
(68,690)
(208,358)
(10,000)
(42,231)
(68,690)
–
–
(208,358)
(10,000)
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
(2,574,712)
(779,765)
(2,574,712)
(779,765)
Net cash used in investing activities
(2,616,943)
(1,066,813)
(2,616,943)
(1,066,813)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from issue of equity securities
Equity securities issue costs
Net cash provided by financing activities
–
–
–
6,047,574
(482,966)
5,564,608
–
–
–
6,047,574
(482,966)
5,564,608
Net increase in cash held
Cash at the beginning of the financial year
(2,966,280)
4,319,264
(2,966,280)
4,319,264
4,327,553
8,289
4,327,493
8,229
Cash at the end of the financial year
6
1,361,273
4,327,553
1,361,213
4,327,493
The above Cash Flow Statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 29
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
1 1 . N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
1.
Statement of Significant Accounting Policies
The financial report covers the consolidated entity of
Empire Resources Limited (‘Empire’) and its
controlled entities and Empire as an individual parent
entity. Empire is a listed public company limited by
shares, incorporated and domiciled in Australia.
This general purpose financial report has been
prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting
Standards, Australian Accounting Interpretations, other
authoritative pronouncements of the Australian
Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and the
Corporations Act 2001. It is prepared on the basis of
historical costs, except for the revaluation of selected
non-current assets that have been measured at fair
value. The financial report is presented in Australian
dollars.
The financial report complies with Australian
Accounting Standards, which include Australian
equivalents to International Financial Reporting
Standards (AIFRS). Compliance with AIFRS ensures
that the consolidated financial report, comprising the
financial statements and notes thereto, complies with
the International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS).
The financial report was authorised for issue by the
Board on 19th September 2008.
The following is a summary of the material
accounting policies adopted by the consolidated
entity in the preparation of the financial report.
The accounting policies have been consistently
applied by the entities in the consolidated entity unless
otherwise stated. The accounting policies have been
consistently applied to all the years presented, unless
otherwise stated.
(a)
Principles of Consolidation
A controlled entity is any entity that Empire has the
power to control the financial and operating policies
of, so as to obtain benefits from its activities.
A list of controlled entities is contained in Note 8 to
the financial statements. All controlled entities have a
June financial year end.
All inter-company balances and transactions between
entities in the consolidated group, including any
unrealised profits or losses, have been eliminated on
consolidation. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have
been changed where necessary to ensure consistencies
with those policies applied by the parent entity.
Where controlled entities enter or leave the
consolidated group during the year, their operating
results are included/excluded from the date control
was obtained or until the date control ceased.
Business Combinations
Business combinations occur where control over
another business is obtained and results in the
consolidation of its assets and liabilities. All business
combinations, including those involving entities under
common control, are accounted for by applying the
purchase method.The purchase method requires an
acquirer of the business to be identified and for the
cost of the acquisition and fair values of identifiable
assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities to be
determined as at acquisition date, being the date
that control is obtained. Cost is determined as the
aggregate of fair values of assets given, equity issued
and liabilities assumed in exchange for control,
together with costs directly attributable to the business
combination. Any deferred consideration payable is
discounted to present value using the entity’s
incremental borrowing rate.
(b)
Plant and Equipment
Plant and equipment is measured on the cost basis less
depreciation and impairment losses.
The carrying amount of plant and equipment is
reviewed annually by directors to ensure it is not in
excess of the recoverable amount from those assets.
Recoverable amount is assessed on the basis of the
expected net cash flows that will be received from
the asset’s employment and subsequent disposal.The
expected net cash flows have been discounted to their
present values in determining recoverable amounts.
Depreciation is calculated on the straight line basis and
is brought to account over the estimated useful lives
of all plant and equipment from the time the asset
is held ready for use.The depreciation rates used are
as follows.
Office furniture
Office computer equipment
Motor vehicles
15-33%
33%
20%
The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed,
and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date.
An asset’s carrying amount is written down
immediately to its recoverable amount if the assets
carrying amount is greater than its estimated
recoverable amount. Gains and losses on disposal are
determined by comparing proceeds with the carrying
amount.These gains and losses are included in the
income statement.When revalued assets are sold,
amounts included in the revaluation reserve relating to
the assets are then transferred to accumulated losses.
Page 30
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
(c)
Income Tax
(d)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand,
deposits held at call with banks, other short-term
highly liquid investments with original maturities of
3 months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts
are shown within short-term borrowings in current
liabilities on the balance sheet.
(e)
Acquisition of Assets
The purchase method of accounting is used for all
acquisitions of assets, regardless of whether shares or
other assets are acquired. Cost is determined as the
fair value of the assets given up at the date of the
acquisition plus costs incidental to the acquisition.
Transaction costs arising on the issue of equity
instruments are recognised directly in equity.
(f)
Impairment of Assets
At each reporting date, the group reviews the carrying
values of its tangible and intangible assets to determine
whether there is any indication that those assets have
been impaired. If such an indication exists, the
recoverable amount of the asset, being the higher of
the asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use,
is compared to the asset’s carrying value. Any excess of
the asset’s carrying value over its recoverable amount is
expensed to the income statement.
Impairment testing is performed annually for goodwill
and intangible assets with indefinite lives.
Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable
amount of an individual asset, the group estimates the
recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to
which the asset belongs.
The Company adopts the liability method of tax-effect
accounting whereby the income tax expense is based
on the profit from ordinary activities adjusted for any
non-assessable or disallowed items.
Deferred tax is accounted for using the balance sheet
liability method in respect of temporary differences
arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities
and their carrying amounts in the financial statements.
No deferred income tax will be recognised from the
initial recognition of an asset or liability, excluding a
business combination, where there is no effect on
accounting or taxable profit or loss.
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are
expected to apply to the period when the asset is
realised or liability is settled. Deferred tax is credited in
the income statement, except where it relates to items
that may be credited directly to equity, in which case
the deferred tax is adjusted directly against equity.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised to the
extent that it is probable that future tax profits will be
available against which the benefits of deferred tax
assets can be utilised.
The amount of benefits brought to account or
which may be realised in the future is based on the
assumption that no adverse change will occur in
income taxation legislation and the anticipation that
the economic entity will derive sufficient future
assessable income to enable the benefit to be realised
and comply with the conditions of deductibility
imposed by the law.
Empire and its wholly-owned Australian subsidiary
have formed an income tax consolidated group under
the tax consolidation legislation. Each entity in the
group recognises its own current and deferred tax
liabilities, except for any deferred tax assets and
liabilities resulting from unused tax losses and tax
credits, which are immediately assumed by the parent
entity.The current tax liability of each group entity is
then subsequently assumed by the parent entity.The
group will notify the Tax Office its intention to
form an income tax consolidated group to apply
retrospectively from 31 January 2007.The tax
consolidated group will enter into a tax-sharing
agreement whereby each company in the group
contributes to the income tax payable in proportion to
their contribution to profit before tax of the tax
consolidated group.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 31
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 7
(g)
Financial Instruments
(j)
Trade Receivables
Recognition
Financial instruments are initially measured at cost
on trade date, which includes transaction costs, when
the related contractual rights or obligations exist.
Subsequent to initial recognition, these instruments are
measured as set out below.
Loans and Receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets
with fixed or determinable payments that are not
quoted in an active market and are stated at amortised
cost using the effective interest rate method.
Available-for-sale Financial Assets
Available-for-sale financial assets include any financial
assets not included in the above categories. Available-
for-sale financial assets are reflected at fair value.
Unrealised gains and losses arising from changes in
fair value are taken directly to equity.
Financial Liabilities
Non-derivative financial liabilities are recognised at
amortised cost, comprising original debt less principal
payments and amortisation.
Fair Value
Fair value is determined based on current bid prices
for all quoted investments.Valuation techniques are
applied to determine the fair value for all unlisted
securities, including recent arm’s-length transactions,
reference to similar instruments and option pricing
models.
Impairment
At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether
there is objective evidence that a financial instrument
has been impaired. In the case of available-for-sale
financial instruments, a prolonged decline in the value
of the instrument is considered to determine whether
an impairment has arisen. Impairment losses are
recognised in the income statement.
(h)
Exploration and Development Expenditure
Exploration, evaluation and acquisition costs are
written off in the year they are incurred.
Development costs are capitalised. Amortisation is not
charged on costs carried forward in respect of areas of
interest in the development phase until production.
(i)
Employee Entitlements
Salaries, Wages and Annual Leave
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-
monetary benefits, annual leave and accumulating sick
leave expected to be settled within 12 months of the
reporting date, are recognised in other creditors in
respect to employees’ services up to the reporting date
and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid
when the liabilities are settled. Liabilities for non-
accumulating sick leave are recognised when the leave
is taken and measured at the rates paid or payable.
All trade debtors are recognised at the amounts
receivable as they are due for settlement no more
than 30 days from the date of recognition.
Collectability of trade debtors is reviewed on
an ongoing basis. Debts which are known to be
uncollectible are written off. A provision for doubtful
debts is raised where some doubt as to collection
exists.
(k)
Trade Creditors
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and
services provided to the Company prior to the end
of the financial period and which are unpaid.The
amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within
30 days of recognition.
(l)
Recoverable Amount of Non-current Assets
The recoverable amount of an asset is the net amount
expected to be recovered through the cash inflows and
outflows arising from its continued use and subsequent
disposal.
Where the carrying amount of a non-current asset is
greater than its recoverable amount, the asset is written
down to its recoverable amount.Where net cash
inflows are derived from a group of assets working
together, recoverable amount is determined on the
basis of the relevant group of assets.The decrement
in the carrying amount is recognised as an expense in
net profit or loss in the reporting period in which the
recoverable amount write-down occurs.
The expected net cash flows used in determining
recoverable amount are not discounted to their
present value.
(m)
Leased Non-current Assets
A distinction is made between finance leases, which
effectively transfer from the lessor to the lessee
substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to
ownership of leased non-current assets, and operating
leases under which the lessor effectively retains
substantially all such risks and benefits
Operating lease payments are charged to the Profit and
Loss in the periods in which they are incurred, as this
represents the pattern of benefits derived from the
leased assets.
(n)
Revenue Recognition
Amounts disclosed as revenue are net of duties and
taxes paid. Revenue is recognised as follows.
(i) Interest
Interest earned is recognised as and when it is
receivable, including interest which is accrued and
is readily convertible to cash within 2 working days.
Accrued interest is recorded as part of other
debtors.
Page 32
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 7
(ii)Sundry Income
Sundry income is recognised as and when it is
receivable. Income receivable, but not received at
balance date, is recorded as part of other debtors.
(o)
Goods and Services Tax (‘GST’)
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the
amount of GST, except where the amount of GST
incurred is not recoverable from the Australian Tax
Office. In these circumstances the GST is recognised as
part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of
an item of the expense. Receivables and payables in
the Balance Sheet are shown inclusive of GST.
(p)
Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgements
The directors evaluate estimates and judgments
incorporated into the financial report based on
historical knowledge and the best available current
information. Estimates assume a reasonable expectation
of future events and are based on current trends and
economic data, obtained both externally and within
the group.
Key Estimates — Impairment
The group assesses impairment at each reporting date
by evaluating conditions specific to the group that may
lead to impairment of assets.Where an impairment
trigger exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is
determined.Value-in-use calculations performed in
assessing recoverable amounts incorporate a number
of key estimates.
(ii) Revised AASB 123 Borrowing Costs and AASB
2007-6 Amendments to Australian Account
Standards arising from AASB 123 (AASB 1,
AASB 101, AASB 107, AASB 111, AASB 116 &
AASB 138 and interpretations 1 & 12).The revised
AASB 123 is applicable to annual reporting periods
commencing on or after 1 January 2009. It has
removed the option to expense all borrowing
costs and – when adopted – will require the
capitalisation of all borrowing costs directly
attributable to the acquisition, construction or
production of a qualifying asset.There will be no
impact on the financial report of the group, as the
group already capitalises borrowing costs relating
to qualifying assets.
(iii) Revised AASB 101 Presentation of Financial
Statements and AASB 2007 – 8 Amendments to
Australian Accounting Standards arising from
AASB 101. A revised AASB 101 was issued in
September 2007 and is applicable for annual
reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January
2009. It requires the presentation of a statement of
comprehensive income and makes changes to the
statement of recognised income and expense, but
will not affect any of the amounts recognised in
the financial statements. If an entity has made a
prior period adjustment or has reclassified items in
the financial statements, it will need to disclose a
third balance sheet (statement of financial position),
this one being as at the beginning of the
comparative period.
(q)
New Accounting Standards and Interpretations
(r)
Comparative Figures
When required by Accounting Standards, comparative
figures have been adjusted to conform to changes in
presentation for the current financial year.
Certain new accounting standards and interpretations
have been published that are not mandatory for
30 June 2008 reporting periods. The consolidated
entity’s assessment of the impact of these new standards
and interpretations is set out below.
(i) AASB 8 Operating Segments and AASB 2007-3
Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards
arising from AASB 8. AASB 8 and AASB 2007-3
are effective for annual reporting periods
commencing on or after 1 January 2009. AASB 8
will result in a significant change in the approach
to segment reporting, as it requires adoption of a
‘management approach’ to reporting on financial
performance.The information being reported will
be based on what the key decision-makers use
internally for evaluating segment performance and
deciding how to allocate resources to operating
segments.The Group has not yet decided when to
adopt AASB 8. Application of AASB 8 may result
in different segments, segment results and different
types of information being reported in the segment
note of the financial report. However, at this stage
it is not expected to affect any of the amounts
recognised in the financial statements.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 33
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
2.
Revenue
Revenue
Interest received
Other income
3.
Loss from Ordinary Activities
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
177,529
111,237
130,155
–
177,529
111,237
130,155
–
288,766
130,155
288,766
130,155
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
Loss before income tax
The loss from ordinary activities before
income tax has been determined after:
(a) Expenses
Depreciation
Exploration costs written off
Impairment of non-current assets:
23,919
3,324,163
Impairment writedown for investment in controlled entity
Impairment writedown for loan to controlled entity
–
–
5,422
830
–
–
23,919
2,638,454
1,100,000
760,431
5,422
830
–
–
4.
Income Tax
(a) Income tax recognised in profit
No income tax is payable by the parent or consolidated entities as they both recorded losses for income tax purposes
for the year, as a tax consolidated group.
(b) Numerical reconciliation between income tax expense and the loss before income tax.
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
Loss before tax
(3,713,015)
(3,580,357)
(4,887,737)
(2,405,635)
Income tax benefit at 30% (2007:30%)
(1,113,905)
(1,074,107)
(1,466,321)
(721,691)
Tax effect of:
– deductible capital-raising expenditure
(34,188)
(34,187)
(34,188)
(34,187)
– non-deductible expenditure
– deductible temporary differences
– deductible exploration
– share-based payment
Deferred tax asset not recognised
Income tax benefit attributable to loss from
ordinary activities before tax
1,359
–
–
5,686
1,141,048
–
1,359
–
(320,571)
(330,000)
–
1,758,865
–
–
(320,571)
–
5,686
1,493,464
–
1,076,449
–
–
–
–
Page 34
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
4.
Income Tax (continued)
(c) Unrecognised deferred tax balances
Tax losses attributable to members of the
tax consolidated group – revenue
Potential tax benefit at 30%
Deferred tax liability not booked
– other
Deferred tax asset asset not booked
Amounts recognised in Profit and Loss
– impairment of non-current assets
– employee provisions
– other
Amounts recognised in equity
– share issue costs
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
8,078,445
3,824,970
5,543,716
2,480,672
2,423,534
1,147,491
1,663,115
744,202
–
–
3,715
22,339
(9,633)
(330,000)
–
–
–
–
–
558,129
3,715
22,339
(9,633)
–
–
–
–
–
Net unrecognised deferred tax asset at 30%
2,439,955
817,491
2,237,665
744,202
A deferred tax asset attributable to income tax losses has not been recognised at balance date as the probability criteria
disclosed in Note 1(c) are not satisfied and such benefit will only be available if the conditions of deductibility also
disclosed in Note 1(c) are satisfied.
For the purposes of taxation, Empire and its 100% owned Australian subsidiary are a tax consolidated group. The head
entity of the tax consolidated group is Empire.The group intends to enter into a tax-sharing agreement and an election
for the purposes of tax consolidation will be made.
5.
Loss Per Share
Basic and diluted loss per share (cents per share)
Consolidated group
2008
Cents
(6.00)
2007
Cents
(10.21)
Loss used in the calculation of basic EPS
(3,713,015)
(3,580,357)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
during the year used in calculations of basic loss per share
61,919,425
35,053,193
Diluted loss per share has not been disclosed as it is not
materially different from basic loss per share
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 35
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
6.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash at bank and in hand
7.
Receivables
Current
Trade receivables
Other receivables
Provision for impairment of receivables
Non-Current
Amount receivable from controlled entity
Provision for impairment of loans to controlled entities
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
1,361,273
1,361,273
4,327,553
4,327,553
1,361,213
1,361,213
4,327,493
4,327,493
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
80,000
67,899
(80,000)
67,899
–
134,903
–
134,903
80,000
67,899
(80,000)
67,899
–
134,903
–
134,903
–
–
–
–
–
–
853,261
(853,261)
167,552
(92,830)
–
74,722
Provision For Impairment of Receivables
Current trade receivables are non-interest bearing and generally on 30 day terms. A provision for impairment is
recognised when there is objective evidence that an individual trade receivable is impaired.
Consolidated Group and Parent Entity
Current trade receivables
Opening
Balance
1.7.07
$
Charge
for the
Year
$
Amounts
Written
Off
$
Closing
Balance
30.6.08
$
–
–
80,000
80,000
–
–
80,000
80,000
Page 36
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
8.
Financial Assets
Unlisted investments, at-cost
Shares in controlled entities
Provision for impairment
Controlled Entities
Parent entity:
Empire Resources Limited
Subsidiaries of Empire Resources Limited:
PGM Technologies Oceania Pty Ltd
Torrens Resources Pty Ltd
9.
Plant and Equipment
Plant and Equipment
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Motor Vehicles
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
–
–
–
–
–
–
1,148,200
1,148,200
(1,148,200)
(48,200)
–
1,100,000
Country of
incorporation
Australia
Australia
Australia
Percentage Owned
2008
%
–
100
100
2007
%
–
100
100
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
27,198
(13,176)
14,022
90,217
(21,634)
68,583
21,323
(7,351)
13,972
53,863
(3,542)
50,321
27,198
(13,176)
14,022
21,323
(7,351)
13,972
90,217
(21,634)
68,583
53,863
(3,542)
50,321
Total Plant and Equipment
82,605
64,293
82,605
64,293
Movements in the carrying amounts of each class of property, plant and equipment at the beginning and end of the
current financial period is as set out below.
Plant and Equipment
Balance at the beginning of year
Additions
Depreciation expense
Carrying amount at the end of the year
Motor Vehicles
Balance at the beginning of year
Additions
Depreciation expense
Carrying amount at the end of the year
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
13,972
5,876
(5,826)
14,022
50,321
36,355
(18,093)
68,583
1,025
14,827
(1,880)
13,972
–
53,863
(3,542)
50,321
13,972
5,876
(5,826)
14,022
50,321
36,355
(18,093)
68,583
1,025
14,827
(1,880)
13,972
–
53,863
(3,542)
50,321
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 37
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
10.
Trade and Other Payables
Trade payables and accruals
Employee benefits
Non-interest-bearing loans
11.
Issued Capital
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
415,849
19,755
90,000
525,604
2007
$
424,838
6,427
90,000
521,265
2008
$
414,999
19,755
90,000
2007
$
423,988
6,427
90,000
524,754
520,415
(a)
Ordinary Shares
Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding-up of the Company in
proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares.
On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting, in person or by proxy, is entitled to one vote,
and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote.
66,918,192 (2007: 60,418,192) fully paid ordinary shares
9,420,471
2008
$
2007
$
8,745,721
2008
$
9,420,471
2007
$
8,745,721
Consolidated group
Parent entity
(i) Ordinary shares – number
At 1 July 2007
Shares issued – 229,883 on 15 August 2006
at $0.10 Challenge Drilling
Shares issued – 250,000 on 27 October 2006
at $0.10 Yuinmery
Shares issued – 500,000 on 3 November 2006
at $0.10
Shares issued – 2,275,000 on 13 November 2006
at $0.10
Shares issued – 27,500,000 on 29 January 2007
at $0.20 IPO
Shares issued – 5,000,000 on 29 January 2007
at $0.20 Torrens
Shares issued – 1,000,000 on 29 January 2007
at $0.20 Penny’s Find
Shares issued – 5,000,000 on 7 June 2007
at $0.18 Yarlarweelor
Shares issued – 100,000 on 26 July 2007
at $0.30 RM Capital Pty Ltd
Shares issued – 500,000 on 31 December 2007
at $0.22 Meekal Pty Ltd
Shares issued – 100,000 on 31 December 2007
at $0.18 Simmonds
Shares issued – 100,000 on 31 December 2007
at $0.18 Muskett
Shares issued – 1,250,000 on 5 February 2008
at $0.135 Meekal Pty Ltd
Shares issued –1,000,000 on 12 May 2008
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
No.
2007
No.
2008
No.
2007
No.
60,418,192
18,663,309
60,418,192
18,663,309
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
229,883
250,000
500,000
2,275,000
27,500,000
5,000,000
1,000,000
5,000,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
229,883
250,000
500,000
2,275,000
27,500,000
5,000,000
1,000,000
5,000,000
100,000
500,000
100,000
100,000
1,250,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
100,000
500,000
100,000
100,000
1,250,000
1,000,000
2,450,000
1,000,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
at $0.18 Rubystar Nominees Pty Ltd – Penny’s Find
1,000,000
Shares issued – 2,450,000 on 12 May 2008
at $0.188 ERL Share Plan
Shares issued – 1,000,000 on 26 May 2008
at $0.15 Meekal Pty Ltd – Yuinmery
2,450,000
1,000,000
Balance at 30 June 2008
66,918,192
60,418,192
66,918,192
60,418,192
Page 38
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
11.
Issued capital (continued)
(ii) Ordinary shares – value
At 1 July 2007
Shares issued – 229,883 on 15 August 2006
at $0.10 Challenge Drilling
Shares issued – 250,000 on 27 October 2007
at $0.10 Yuinmery
Shares issued – 500,000 on 3 November 2006
at $0.10
Shares issued – 2,275,000 on 13 November 2006
at $0.10
Shares issued – 27,500,000 on 29 January 2007
at $0.20 IPO
Shares issued – 5,000,000 on 29 January 2007
at $0.20 Torrens
Shares issued – 1,000,000 on 29 January 2007
at $0.20 Penny’s Find
Shares issued – 5,000,000 on 7 June 2007
at $0.18 Yarlarweelor
Shares issued – 100,000 on 26 July 2007
at $0.30 RM Capital
Shares issued – 500,000 on 31 December 2007
at $0.22 Meekal
Shares issued – 100,000 on 31 December 2007
at $0.18 Simmonds
Shares issued – 100,000 on 31 December 2007
at $0.18 Muskett
Shares issued – 1,250,000 on 5 February 2008
at $0.135 Meekal
Shares issued – 1,000,000 on 12 May 2008 at $0.18
Rubystar Nominees Pty Ltd – Penny’s Find
Shares issued – 2,450,000 on 12 May 2008
under ERL Share Plan
Shares issued – 1,000,000 on 26 May 2008
at $0.15 Meekal Pty Ltd – Yuinmery
Less share issue costs
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
8,745,721
1,518,700
8,745,721
1,518,700
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
22,983
25,000
50,000
227,500
5,500,000
1,000,000
200,000
900,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
22,983
25,000
50,000
227,500
5,500,000
1,000,000
200,000
900,000
30,000
110,000
18,000
18,000
168,750
180,000
–
150,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
30,000
110,000
18,000
18,000
168,750
180,000
–
150,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(698,462)
–
(698,462)
Balance at 30 June 2008
9,420,471
8,745,721
9,420,471
8,745,721
(b)
Options
As at 30 June 2008 (30 June 2007: 30,709,075), the Company had the following options on issue over ordinary shares.
Grant date
19-Jun-07
01-Feb-07
Date of expiry
30-Jun-09
31-Dec-10
Exercise price ($) Number under option
0.25
0.25
27,709,075
3,000,000
30,709,075
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 39
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
12.
Reserves
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
Reserves
511,541
492,587
511,541
492,587
Reserves comprise the following.
Options reserve
Balance as at start of financial year
492,587
–
492,587
–
Options issued – 3,000,000 on 1 February 2007
at a deemed price of 7.5 cents – expiry 31 December 2010
Options issued – 27,709,075 on 15 June 2007
at $0.01 – expiry 30 June 2009
Share-based payment
Less share issue costs
–
–
232,500
277,091
–
–
18,954
–
18,954
232,500
277,091
–
–
(17,004)
–
(17,004)
Balance as at end of the financial year
511,541
492,587
511,541
492,587
Details of certain components of the option reserve arising as a consequence of equity based payments are included in
Note 19.
13.
Financial Risk Management
The consolidated entity’s financial situation is not complex. Its activities may expose it to a variety of financial risks in
the future: market risk (including currency risk and fair value interest rate risk), credit risk, liquidity risk and cash flow
interest rate risk. At that stage, the consolidated entity’s overall risk management program will focus on the
unpredictability of the financial markets and seek to minimise potential adverse effects on the financial performance
of the consolidated entity.
Risk management is carried out under an approved framework covering a risk management policy and internal
compliance and control by management.The Board identifies, evaluates and approves measures to address financial risks.
The consolidated and the parent entity hold the following financial instruments.
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables
(a)
Market Risk
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
1,361,273
4,327,553
1,361,213
4,327,493
67,899
134,903
67,899
134,903
1,429,172
4,462,456
1,429,112
4,462,396
525,604
521,265
524,754
520,415
Cash flow and fair value interest rate risk
The consolidated entity’s main interest rate risk arises from cash deposits to be applied to exploration and development
of areas of interest. Deposits at variable rates expose the consolidated entity to cash flow interest rate risk. Deposits at
fixed rates expose the consolidated entity to fair value interest rate risk. During 2008 and 2007, the consolidated entity’s
deposits at variable rates were denominated in Australian dollars.
As at the reporting date, the consolidated entity had the following variable rate deposits and there were no interest rate
swap contracts outstanding.
Page 40
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
13.
Financial Risk Management (continued)
Deposit
Other cash available
Net exposure to cash flow
interest rate risk
2008
Weighted
average
2007
Weighted
average
interest rate
Balance
interest rate
Balance
%
$
887,561
473,712
%
$
4,323,086
4,407
6.2%
1,361,273
6.0%
4,327,493
The consolidated entity analyses its interest rate exposure on a dynamic basis.Various scenarios are simulated taking into
account the renewal of existing positions.
Sensitivity – consolidated and parent entity
During 2008, if interest rates had been 10% higher or lower than the prevailing rates realised, with all other variables
held constant, there would be an immaterial change in post-tax profit for the year. Equity would not have been
impacted.
(b)
Credit Risk
The consolidated entity has no significant concentrations of credit risk. Cash transactions are limited to high credit
quality financial institutions. Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments and
deposits with banks and financial institutions, as well as credit exposures on outstanding receivables and committed
transactions. In relation to other credit risk areas, management assesses the credit quality of the customer, taking into
account its financial position, past experience and other factors.
The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying amount of the financial assets as summarised
at the beginning of this note.
(c)
Liquidity Risk
Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash, the availability of funding through an adequate
amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close-out market positions.The consolidated entity manages
liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of financial
assets and liabilities.The consolidated entity will aim at maintaining flexibility in funding by accessing appropriate
committed credit lines available from different counterparties where appropriate and possible. Surplus funds, when
available ,are generally only invested in high-credit, quality financial institutions in highly liquid markets.
Financing arrangements
The consolidated and parent entity have no borrowing facilities.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 41
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
13.
Financial Risk Management (continued)
Fixed interest rate maturing
Weighted
average
effective
Floating
interest
rate
$
Within year
1 to 5 years Over 5 years
bearing
$
$
$
$
Total
$
Non–interest-
30 June 2008
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
6.2%
1,361,273
Trade and other receivables
Total Financial Assets
–
1,361,273
Financial Liabilities:
Trade and other payables
Short-term borrowings
Total financial liabilities
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1,361,273
67,899
67,899
67,899
1,429,172
525,604
525,604
–
–
525,604
525,604
Fixed interest rate maturing
Weighted
average
effective
Floating
interest
rate
$
Within year
1 to 5 years Over 5 years
bearing
$
$
$
$
Total
$
Non–interest-
30 June 2007
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
6.0%
4,327,553
Trade and other receivables
Total Financial Assets
–
4,327,553
Financial Liabilities:
Trade and other payables
Short-term borrowings
Total financial liabilities
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
4,327,553
134,903
134,903
134,903
4,462,456
521,265
521,265
–
–
521,265
521,265
Maturities of financial assets and liabilities
The note above analyses the consolidated and parent entity’s financial liabilities.These liabilities comprise trade and other
payables, are non-interest-bearing and will mature within 12 months.The amounts disclosed are the contractual
undiscounted cash flows.There are no derivatives.
Maturity analysis of financial assets and liability based on management’s expectation
Year ended 30 June 2008
<6 months
6-12 months
1-5 years
>5 years
Total
Consolidated
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Year ended 30 June 2008
Consolidated
Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables
Net maturity
1,361,273
67,899
1,429,172
–
–
–
435,604
993,568
90,000
(90,000)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1,361,273
67,899
1,429,172
525,604
903,568
Page 42
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
13.
Financial Risk Management (continued)
(d)
Fair Value Estimation
The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities must be estimated for recognition and measurement or for
disclosure purposes.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, investments in unlisted
subsidiaries) is determined using valuation techniques or cost (impaired if appropriate).The consolidated entity uses a
variety of methods and makes assumptions that are based on market conditions existing at each balance date.
The carrying value less impairment provision of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair
values due to their short-term nature.
14.
Capital and Leasing Commitments
(i)
Operating Lease Commitments
Non-cancellable operating leases contracted for but not
capitalised in the financial Payable – minimum lease payments
– not later than 12 months
– between 12 months and 5 years
– greater than 5 years.
The Company entered into an operating lease on 1 August 2007
for office space it occupies in Victoria Park. The term of the
lease is 3 years and expires on 1 August 2010.
(ii)
Expenditure Commitments Contracted For
Exploration tenements
In order to maintain current rights of tenure to exploration
tenements, the Company is required to outlay rentals and
to meet the minimum expenditure requirements. These
obligations are not provided for in the financial statements
and are payable:
– not later than 12 months
– between 12 months and 5 years
– greater than 5 years.
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
32,649
34,418
–
28,617
68,289
–
32,649
34,418
–
28,617
68,289
–
67,067
96,906
67,067
96,906
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
970,004
531,646
919,155
480,797
3,880,016
2,126,584
3,676,620
1,923,188
–
–
–
–
4,850,020
2,658,230
4,595,775
2,403,985
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 43
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
15.
Directors and Other Key Management Personnel
(i)
Details of Key Management Personnel
Chairman – non-executive
Mr A Griffin (from 3 February 2004)
Managing Director
Mr D Sargeant (from 13 April 2000)
Executive Director
Mr A Jessup (from 15 August 2003)
(ii)
Compensation of Key Management Personnel
Short-term employee benefits
Post-employment benefits
Share-based payments
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
318,100
–
16,246
334,346
2007
$
151,560
–
–
151,560
2008
$
325,600
–
16,246
341,846
2007
$
151,560
–
–
151,560
The Company has taken advantage of the relief provided by AASB 2008-4 Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standard – Key Management Personnel Disclosures by Disclosing Entities, and has transferred the detailed
remuneration disclosures to the directors’ report.The relevant information can be found in the Remuneration
Report on pages 20 to 24.
(iii)
Equity Instrument Disclosures Relating to Directors and Other Key Management Personnel
Shareholdings
The number of ordinary shares in the Company held during the year by each director and other key management
personnel, including their personally related entities or associates, are set out below.
Directors
of the period
share plan
of options
other
of the period
Balance at
Balance at
the start
Issued under
On exercise
Net change
the end
Directors
Mr Adrian Griffin
Mr David Sargeant
Mr Adrian Jessup
Specified Executives
Mr Simon Storm
–
5,100,000
1,367,555
500,000
750,000
500,000
6,467,555
1,750,000
–
–
350,000
350,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
100,000
100,000
500,000
5,850,000
1,967,555
8,317,555
–
–
350,000
350,000
Page 44
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
15.
Directors and Other Key Management Personnel (continued)
All equity transactions with key management personnel, which relate to the Company’s listed ordinary shares, have been
entered into on an arm’s-length basis.
Option holdings
Details of shares issued as remuneration can be found in the remuneration report.
The number of options over ordinary shares in the Company held during the reporting period by each director and key
management personnel, including their personally related entities, are set out below.
Balance at
Acquired
Expired
Balance at
Vested and
the start of
the period
the end of
exercisable at
the period
30 June 2008
300,000
2,849,999
983,777
–
–
200,000
4,133,776
200,000
200,000
200,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
300,000
300,000
2,849,999
2,849,999
1,183,777
1,183,777
4,333,776
4,333,776
200,000
200,000
200,000
200,000
Directors
Mr Adrian Griffin
Mr David Sargeant
Mr Adrian Jessup
Specified Executives
Mr Simon Storm
16.
Related Parties
Directors and specified executives
Disclosures relating to the remuneration and shareholdings of directors and specified executives are set out in the
Directors’ Report and Note 15 respectively.
Other transactions with directors, their associates and director related entities are as follows.
Amounts paid to companies associated with certain
Directors for management services
Kirkdale Holdings Pty Ltd – Mr D Sargeant
Murilla Exploration Pty Ltd – Mr A Jessup
Total
Amounts payable to directors for directors’
fees
Mr Adrian Griffin
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
125,000
125,000
250,000
50,000
50,000
100,000
125,000
125,000
250,000
50,000
50,000
100,000
30,000
12,500
30,000
12,500
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 45
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
17.
Remuneration of Auditors
Amounts received or due and receivable by the auditors for:
Audit or review of the financial reports of
the Company
Other services
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
2007
$
2008
$
2007
$
20,350
6,710
27,060
6,050
11,550
17,600
20,350
2,420
22,770
6,050
11,550
17,600
18.
Cash Flow Information
(i)
Reconciliation of cash flow from operations with loss after income tax
Loss after income tax
Depreciation
Share based payments expense
Impairment on non-current assets
Impairment of receivable
Exploration expenditure written off
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the
effects of purchase of subsidiaries:
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables
(Decrease)/Increase in trade and other payables
(Decrease)/Increase in employee benefits
Net cash outflow from operating activities
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
(3,713,015)
23,919
18,954
–
80,000
2007
$
(3,580,357)
5,422
–
–
–
2008
$
(4,887,737)
23,919
18,954
1,860,431
80,000
2007
$
(2,405,635)
5,422
–
–
–
3,324,163
3,346,450
2,638,454
2,171,728
(265,979)
(228,485)
(265,979)
(228,485)
(80,000)
(16,686)
13,328
–
43,527
6,427
(80,000)
(16,686)
13,328
–
43,527
6,427
(349,337)
(178,531)
(349,337)
(178,531)
Page 46
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
19.
Share-based Payments
(a)
Employee Share Plan
The Company has established an employee share plan, which is also available to directors, known as the 2008 Empire
Resources Limited Employee Share Plan (‘the Plan’) and was approved by shareholders on 28 November 2007.
The issue price for shares offered under the Plan is at the discretion of the Board, provided that the issue price is not less
than 1% below the weighted average sale price of shares sold through ASX during the 1-week period up to and
including the offer date.
A director or employee who is invited to subscribe for shares under the Plan may also be invited to apply for a loan up
to the amount payable in respect of the shares accepted, on the following terms.
a) Loans must be made solely to the participant or their nominee and in the name of either the participant or their
nominee as the case may be.
b) The principal amount outstanding under a loan will be interest-free.
c) Any loan made available to a participant shall be applied by the Company directly toward payment of the issue price
of the shares to be acquired under the Plan.
d) The term of the loan shall be 3 years from the date of issue of the shares.
e) The Company retains a lien over each share acquired pursuant to the loan until such time as the loan is repaid.
Set out below is a summary of shares issued to directors and employees under the Plan.
Consolidated and parent
entity – 30 June 2008
Issue date
12 May 2008
Expiry date
21 May 2013
Weighted average exercise price
Balance
at start
of period
$A
–
Issued
during year
Number
2,450,000
0.188
Loan repaid
during year
Number
–
Expired
during year
Number
–
Balance
at end
of year
Number
2,450,000
0.188
Exercisable
at end
of year
Number
–
Fair value of director and employee shares issued
The fair value at issue date is determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the
exercise price, the term of the loan, the impact of dilution, the share price at issue date and expected price volatility of
the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the loan.
The model inputs for shares granted during the year ended 30 June 2008 included:
(a) shares are granted for no consideration, have a 3-year life and vest from issue date to 36 months after date of issue.
(b)exercise price - $0.188.
(c) issue date - 12 May 2008.
(d)expiry date – 12 May 2011.
(e)expected price volatility of the Company’s shares: 114%.
(f) risk-free interest rate – 7.0%.
(g)the share price at issue date – $0.195.
(b)
Expenses Arising From Share-based Payment Transactions
Total expenses arising from share-based payment transactions recognised during the period as part of employee benefit
expense were as follows.
Shares issued under employee share plan
Consolidated group
Parent entity
2008
$
18,954
2007
$
–
2008
$
18,954
2007
$
–
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 47
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
20.
Change in Accounting Policy
The consolidated group changed its accounting policy for the financial year ending 30 June 2008 relating to the
accounting for exploration and development expenditure. Exploration and development costs were previously carried
forward to the extent that they were expected to be recouped through the successful development of the area or where
activities in the area have not yet reached a stage that permits reasonable assessment of the existence of economically
recoverable reserves.The group has now elected to write off exploration, evaluation and acquisition costs in the year
they are incurred.This change has been implemented as the directors are of the opinion that the write-off of
exploration, evaluation and acquisition costs will provide more relevant information as it results in a more accurate
reflection of the net assets of an exploration company.
The aggregate effect of the change in accounting policy on the annual financial statements for the year ended 30 June
2008 is as follows (no taxation effect results from these changes).
Consolidated Group
Income Statement
Exploration expense
Loss before income tax
Basic and diluted loss per share
Balance Sheet
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Opening accumulated losses
Parent Entity
Income Statement
Exploration expense
Loss before income tax
Basic and diluted loss per share
Balance Sheet
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Opening accumulated losses
Previously
($)
2008
Adjustment
($)
Restated
($)
–
(308,852)
(0.50)
(3,324,163)
(3,324,163)
(5.37)
(3,324,163)
(3,633,015)
(5.87)
3,324,163
(5,232,824)
(3,324,163)
–
–
(5,232,824)
Previously
($)
2008
Adjustment
($)
Restated
($)
–
(2,169,283)
(0.50)
2,638,454
(4,057,312)
(2,638,454)
(2,638,454)
(5.37)
(2,638,454)
–
(2,638,454)
(4,807,737)
(5.87)
–
(4,057,312)
Page 48
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D A N D C O N T R O L L E D E N T I T I E S
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S TAT E M E N T S 3 0 J U N E 2 0 0 8
20.
Change in Accounting Policy (continued)
Consolidated Group
Income Statement
Exploration expense
Loss before income tax
Basic and diluted loss per share
Balance Sheet
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Opening accumulated losses
Parent Entity
Income Statement
Exploration expense
Loss before income tax
Basic and diluted loss per share
Balance Sheet
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Opening accumulated losses
Previously
($)
(830)
(234,737)
(0.67)
1,057,940
(594,527)
Previously
($)
(830)
(234,737)
(0.67)
1,057,940
(593,737)
2007
Adjustment
($)
Restated
($)
(3,345,620)
(3,345,620)
(9.54)
(1,057,940)
(1,057,940)
2007
Adjustment
($)
(2,170,898)
(2,170,898)
(9.54)
(1,057,940)
(1,057,940)
(3,346,450)
(3,580,357)
(10.21)
–
(1,652,467)
Restated
($)
(2,171,728)
(2,405,635)
(10.21)
–
(1,651,677)
21.
Segment Information
For the year ended 30 June 2008, the consolidated and parent entity operated predominantly in WA in the minerals,
development and exploration operating segment.
22.
Events After the Balance Sheet Date
In 3 July 2008, the Company placed 5 million shares at 17 cents per share with Apex Resources Ltd to raise A$850,000.
The funds raised will be used to progress exploration of VMS style copper-gold occurrences within Empire’s Yuinmery
tenements, including diamond drilling to test down plunge extensions of mineralised zones identified at Just Desserts,
and an initial resource calculation.
The agreement to sell the Yarlarweelor uranium project in Western Australia for $1.75 million was terminated on
25 August 2008.
Other than this, since 30 June 2008 there has not been any matter or circumstance not otherwise dealt with in the
financial report that has significantly affected or may significantly affect the Company.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 49
In the directors’ opinion:
1 2 . D I R E C T O R S ’ D E C L A R AT I O N
(a) the financial statements and notes set out on pages 26 to 49 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001,
including:
(i) complying with Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional
reporting requirements, and
(ii)giving a true and fair view of the Company’s and consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2008 and of
their performance for the financial year ended on that date, and
(b)there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due
and payable, and
(c) the audited remuneration disclosures set out on pages 20 to 24 of the Directors’ Report comply with Accounting
Standard AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
The directors have been given the declarations by the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer required by
section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001.
This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors.
David Sargeant
Managing Director
Perth,Western Australia
19 September 2008
Page 50
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
8 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000
GPO Box R1253 Perth WA 6844
T +61 8 9261 9100 F +61 8 9261 9111
www.rsmi.com.au
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
1 3 . I N D E P E N D E N T A U D I T O R ’ S R E P O R T
TO THE MEMBERS OF
T O T H E M E M B E R S O F
E M P I R E R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED
Report on the Financial Report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Empire Resources Limited (“the company”), which
comprises the balance sheet as at 30 June 2008 and the income statement, statement of changes in equity and
cash flow statement for the year ended on that date, a summary of significant accounting policies, other
explanatory notes and the directors' declaration of the consolidated entity comprising the company and the
entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time to time during the financial year.
Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Report
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial report in
accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the
Corporations Act 2001. This responsibility includes establishing and maintaining internal control relevant to the
preparation and fair presentation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that are
reasonable in the circumstances. In Note 1, the directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard
AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements, that compliance with the Australian equivalents to
International Financial Reporting Standards ensures that the financial report, comprising the financial statements
and notes, complies with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in
accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. These Auditing Standards require that we comply with relevant
ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the
financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgement, including the assessment of the
risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the
financial report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes
evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made
by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit
opinions.
Liability limited by a
scheme approved under
Professional Standards
Legislation
52
Major Offices in:
Perth, Sydney, Melbourne,
Adelaide and Canberra
ABN 36 965 185 036
RSM Bird Cameron Partners is an
independent member firm of RSM
International, an affiliation of
independent accounting and
consulting firms.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 51
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED
Independence
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001.
Auditor’s Opinion
In our opinion:
(a)
the financial report of Empire Resources Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001,
including:
(i) giving a true and fair view of the company's and consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June
2008 and of their performance for the year ended on that date; and
(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations)
and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
(b)
the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 1.
Report on the Remuneration Report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 20 to 24 of the directors’ report for the financial
year ended 30 June 2008. The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of
the Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian
Auditing Standards.
Auditor’s Opinion
In our opinion the Remuneration Report of Empire Resources Limited for the financial year ended 30 June 2008
complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
RSM BIRD CAMERON PARTNERS
Chartered Accountants
Perth, WA
Dated: 19 September 2008
S C CUBITT
Partner
Page 52
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
8 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000
GPO Box R1253 Perth WA 6844
T +61 8 9261 9100 F +61 8 9261 9111
www.rsmi.com.au
AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
As lead auditor for the audit of the financial report of Empire Resources Limited for the year ended
30 June 2008, I declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no
contraventions of:
(i)
the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the
audit; and
(ii)
any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
RSM BIRD CAMERON PARTNERS
Chartered Accountants
Perth, WA
Dated: 19 September 2008
S C CUBITT
Partner
Liability limited by a
scheme approved under
Professional Standards
Legislation
54
Major Offices in:
Perth, Sydney, Melbourne,
Adelaide and Canberra
ABN 36 965 185 036
RSM Bird Cameron Partners is an
independent member firm of RSM
International, an affiliation of
independent accounting and
consulting firms.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 53
1 4 . A D D I T I O N A L I N F O R M AT I O N
Additional information required by the ASX and not shown elsewhere in this report is as follows.The information is
current as at 16 September 2008.
(a)
Distribution of Shares
The numbers of shareholders, by size of holding are as follows.
Category (size of holding)
1-1,000
1,001-5,000
5,001-10,000
10,001-100,000
100,001 and over
Number of holders
7
93
146
406
115
767
The number of shareholdings held in less than marketable parcels is 120.
(b)
20 Largest Shareholders
The names of the 20 largest holders of quoted shares are as follows.
SHAREHOLDERS
APEX MINERALS NL
KIRKDALE HOLDINGS PTY LTD
MEEKAL PTY LTD
DW SARGEANT PTY LTD
ZETEK RESOURCES PTY LTD
MRS SUKHON SUHARITDUMRONG
RUBYSTAR NOMINEES PTY LTD
ANZ NOMINEES LIMITED
COLTRANGE PTY LTD
RBJ NOMINEES PTY LTD
MR ARTUR BIRKNER
AGENS PTY LTD
MR ADRIAN JESSUP
KIM & JENNIFER ROBINSON
ELY PLACE NOMINEES LTD
MR JIM JEFFREYS
MURILLA EXPL PL
CITIVIEW PTY LTD
MR BRETT WADE TOLHURST
MR RICHARD J & S HARRIS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Number of shares held
Holding (%)
5,000,000
3,300,000
3,098,333
2,550,000
2,472,000
2,268,500
2,000,000
1,553,791
1,376,677
1,300,000
1,182,500
900,000
722,222
699,500
666,666
644,949
633,333
600,000
550,000
549,000
6.95%
4.59%
4.31%
3.55%
3.44%
3.15%
2.78%
2.16%
1.91%
1.81%
1.64%
1.25%
1.00%
0.97%
0.93%
0.90%
0.88%
0.83%
0.76%
0.76%
Stock exchange listing – listing has been granted for all the ordinary shares of the company on all member exchanges of
the ASX, except for the following, which are not quoted by virtue of restriction agreements.
32,067,471
44.57%
Quoted shares on ASX
Unquoted – escrowed until:
Shares issued under Empire Share Plan
1-Feb-09
Total issued share capital
63,976,998
2,450,000
5,491,194
71,918,192
Page 54
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
(c)
20 Largest Option Holders
The names of the 20 largest holders of quoted options are as follows.
OPTION HOLDERS
D W SARGEANT PTY LTD
MRS SUKHON SUHARITDUMRONG
ALCARDO INVESTMENTS LIMITED
MURILLA EXPLORATION PTY LTD
MR ARTUR BIRKNER
RUBYSTAR NOMINEES PTY LTD
AGENS PTY LTD
COLTRANGE PTY LTD
CAMIRA HOLDINGS PTY LTD
MR ADRIAN MARTIN LAMBERT JESSUP
ELY PLACE NOMINEES LTD
MR JIM JEFFREYS
CITIVIEW PTY LTD
MR ADRIAN CHRISTOPHER GRIFFIN
WHI SECURITIES PTY LTD
MR RICHARD JAMES & MRS SUSAN ELIZABETH HARRIS
CLODENE PTY LTD
BLAMNCO TRADING PTY LTD
NATIONAL NOMINEES LTD
AYMVESS PTY LIMITED
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Number of options held
2,849,999
1,134,250
744,500
616,666
591,250
500,000
450,000
402,500
375,000
361,111
333,333
322,474
300,000
300,000
287,500
274,500
252,251
250,000
250,000
250,000
Holding (%)
10.29%
4.09%
2.69%
2.23%
2.13%
1.80%
1.62%
1.45%
1.35%
1.30%
1.20%
1.16%
1.08%
1.08%
1.04%
0.99%
0.91%
0.90%
0.90%
0.90%
Stock Exchange Listing – listing has been granted for 27,709,075 options over ordinary shares of the company on all
member exchanges of the ASX.
10,845,334
39.11%
(d)
Substantial Shareholders
The names of substantial shareholders who have notified the Company in accordance with section 671B of the
Corporations Act 2001 are as follows.
Shareholder
Apex Minerals NL
David Sargeant
(e)
Voting Rights
Number of shares
5,000,000
5,850,000
All shares carry one vote per unit without restriction.
(f)
Listing Rule 4.10.19
The Company outlined in the prospectus dated 7 November 2006 that it intended to spend funds raised under that
prospectus on exploration and resource evaluation of its projects, in order to advance its exploration prospects to a stage
at which further evaluation and mining development could be financed by joint-venture funding, debt or additional
equity funds.
The Company can confirm that from admission on 31 January 2007 to 30 June 2008 it used the cash that it had at the
time of admission in a way consistent with its business objectives.
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 55
INTERESTS IN MINING AND EXPLORATION TENEMENTS as at 8 September 2008
PROJECT
TROY CREEK
PENNY’S FIND
LARKIN’S FIND
YUINMERY
PARADIS
NOONDIE
YARLARWEELOR
TORRENS
TENEMENT
E69/1486
E69/1728
E69/1729
E69/1826
E69/2357
E69/2358
E69/2485
P69/40
P69/41
P69/42
P69/43
P69/44
P69/45
E27/221
E27/255
M27/156
M27/241
M27/269
P27/1455
P27/1713
P27/1714
P27/1715
P27/1716
P27/1717
P27/1718
P27/1719
P27/1720
P27/1721
P27/1722
P27/1723
P27/1724
P27/1725
P27/1726
P27/1727
P27/1728
P27/1729
P27/1730
P27/1731
P27/1814
P27/1922
P27/1993
P27/1962
E39/1248
M57/265
P57/1214
P57/1215
P57/1216
P57/1217
E57/735
E57/766
E57/767
E47/1200
E47/1203
E57/643
E57/648
E52/2095
EL3530
EL4152
INTEREST
100%
REMARKS
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Application not yet granted
Application not yet granted
Application not yet granted
Application not yet granted
Earning up to 80%
Application not yet granted
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Application not yet granted
Application not yet granted
Application not yet granted
Application not yet granted
Page 56
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED AND CONTROLLED ENTITIES – ANNUAL REPOR T 2008
Page 57