Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Business Equipment & Supplies / Empire Resources Limited

Empire Resources Limited

erl · ASX Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker erl
Exchange ASX
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Business Equipment & Supplies
Employees 1-10
← All annual reports
FY2011 Annual Report · Empire Resources Limited
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
EMPIRE  RESOURCES  LIMITED  AND  CONTROL L ED  ENT IT Y  ABN  32  092  471  513

FOR  THE  YEAR  ENDED  30  JUNE  20 1 1

Empire Resources Limited is a Perth 
based copper and gold focused explorer 
with deposits in Western Australia.

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 1

ANNUAL REPORT 
TABL E  OF  CONTENTS

PAGE
1.    Corporate Directory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  IFC
2.    Highlights of 2010-2011  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  1
3.    Corporate Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  1
4.    Chairman’s Report  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
5.    Review of Operations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
6.    Directors’ Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
7.    Statement of Comprehensive Income  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  26
8.    Statement of Financial Position   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
9.    Statement of Changes in Equity  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  28
10.   Statement of Cash Flows  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  29
11.   Notes to the Financial Statements   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  30
12.   Directors’ Declaration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  57
13.   Independent Auditor’s Report  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  58
14.   Auditor’s Independence Declaration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  60
15.   Corporate Governance Principles  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  61
16.  Additional Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  65

1.  COR POR ATE  DIRECTOR Y

DIRECTORS
Tom Revy BAppSc – Chairman
David Sargeant BSc – Managing Director
Adrian Jessup BSc(Hons) – Executive Director

MANAGEMENT
David Ross BSc(Hons) MSc –  
Exploration Manager

COMPANY SECRETARY
Simon Storm BCom, BCompt(Hons), CA, FCIS

REGISTERED and PRINCIPAL OFFICE
53 Canning Highway
Victoria Park 6100 
Western Australia
Phone +61 (0)8 9361 3100
Facsimile +61 (0)8 9361 3184
Email info@resourcesempire.com.au
Website www.resourcesempire.com.au
ABN 32 092 471 513

SHARE REGISTRY
Security Transfer Registrars Pty Ltd
770 Canning Highway 
Applecross 6153
Western Australia

AUDITOR
HLB Mann Judd
Level 4
130 Stirling Street
Perth 6000
Western Australia

STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING
The Company is listed on the 
Australian Stock Exchange Limited.  
Home Exchange Perth 
ASX Code: Shares ERL 

Page IFC 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
2. 

HIGHLIGHTS  OF  2010-2011:

>  Company trebles land holding at the Yuinmery copper–gold project 

to 227km2 gaining numerous new drill targets

>  Excellent copper grades intersected at the A Zone prospect, 

Yuinmery: 5m @ 2.6% Cu, 0.44g/t Au

>  Flotation testwork on the Just Desserts, Yuinmery mineralization 

gives >95% recovery for copper and >85% for gold

>  110m wide zone of platinum group metal mineralization 

discovered at the Constantine prospect, Yuinmery

>  Company enters into a $2 million cash + royalty sale agreement 

for the Penny’s Find gold project

>  Farm out of Troy Creek copper project completed

>  Government co-funding of $125,000 awarded to the Company for 

drilling at its Yuinmery and Wynne projects. 

SUBS EQUE NT  TO  30  J UNE  2011

>  Further high grade copper intersections at the A Zone prospect, 

Yuinmery confirm it is a major mineralized system: 5m @ 4.4% Cu 
within 19m @ 1.85% Cu and 4m @ 4.7% Cu within 7m @ 3.2% Cu

>  High grade zinc mineralization intersected for the first time at 
Yuinmery. Drilling at A Zone intersects 3m @ 8.2% Zn within  
8m @ 4.0% Zn

>  Drilling beneath the Smith Well gossan at Yuinmery intersects  

8m @ 1.4% Cu, 0.2g/t Au

>  Drilling reinforces the view Yuinmery could be a major VMS 

system with strong similarities to Golden Grove

>  Prospecting has extended the outcropping strike length of base 

metal gossans at the Wynne project to seven kilometres

3. 

COR PORA TE  OBJECT IVES

The Company’s long term 
objective is to become a successful 
mining house by participation in 
the discovery and development of 
one or more world-class mineral 
deposits.

The short term objective is to 
enhance value and obtain a cash 
flow from the Company’s existing 
tenements in Australia which have 
potential for copper, gold and 
PGM deposits. This value may be 
realized by delineating reserves and 
commencing mining operations, 
entering into significant farm-
out or royalty arrangements or 
acquiring new opportunities to 
provide an early cash flow.

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 1

   
 
 
 
4.  CHAIR MAN’S  R EPO RT 

Dear Shareholders

We certainly live in interesting times.

Markets are never simple to predict even at the best of times other than to say good times follow bad times and bad 
times follow good. It is difficult to ignore the European sovereign debt issues and the US fiscal gridlock situation, and 
the impact they have had on global equity and debt markets over the last 12 months. 

The fundamentals, however, are often overlooked during these times. Emerging markets have rapidly become the key 
driver of global commodity demand since the emerging markets’ crisis of the late nineties. According to recent research 
by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, emerging markets drive commodity markets, representing 70% of current base metals 
demand and all growth, despite the fall in their equity markets. This demand reflects positively on both current and 
long term commodity prices and especially on base metals.

Empire’s focus on becoming a base metal producer remains strong and, in the last 12 months, the Company has 
successfully tested and drilled existing and newly identified areas at its Yuinmery project. The option to acquire the La 
Mancha ground adjoining Empire’s tenements during the year provides Empire shareholders with a major land position 
in the highly prospective base metal rich Youanmi greenstone belt. Geophysical, drilling and preliminary metallurgical 
activities undertaken during the year at both A Zone and Just Desserts, add to our belief that the Company is well 
positioned to rapidly grow its current resource base and potentially reach its objective of near term cash flow. Many of 
the project targets remain open both laterally and at depth, and drilling is likely to focus on these areas over the next 12 
months.

On other activities, Empire has continued with exploration programs and strategies to identify medium to long term 
growth for shareholders. During the year, the Company secured a $7 million strategic exploration joint venture 
agreement on its Troy Creek Project which, together with the Penny’s Find deal with Brimstone Resources, provides 
shareholders further exposure to advanced copper and gold assets. 

The Wynne and Constantine projects remain part of the Company’s future growth targets. Through the ‘Western 
Australian Government’s Exploration Incentive Scheme’ Empire was successful in applying for a total of $125,000 in 
funding grants for these two projects. Securing this funding supports management’s view of the highly prospective 
nature of both the Wynne copper and Constantine nickel/PGM projects. 

The significant outcomes achieved this year are a direct result of the commitment and efforts demonstrated by our staff 
and contractors who, on behalf of all shareholders, I would like to thank. I trust that as we make the transition from 
explorer to developer, all stakeholders will continue to show the same support during what should be exciting times 
ahead.

Thomas Revy
Chairman

REGISTERED and PRINCIPAL OFFICE 
53 Canning Highway, Victoria Park WA 6100 (cnr Taylor Street) 
Phone +618 9361 3100 Fax +618 9361 3184 

Page 2 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
5. 

REVIEW  OF  OP ERATIONS

Empire Resources Ltd is a copper and gold focused 
exploration company. 

Since listing in February 2007, the Company has made 
three significant copper and/or gold discoveries in Western 
Australia and announced JORC compliant resources for 
two of these discoveries. 

At the Penny’s Find project near Kalgoorlie in 2007, the 
Company located a near surface high grade gold deposit 
which has a JORC compliant resource estimated at 314,000 
tonnes @ 5.2g/t Au. It is likely further drilling at depth 
would upgrade this resource.

Following exploration success during 2007 and 2008, the 
Company announced a copper–gold resource for the Just 
Desserts prospect at the Yuinmery project, 80km southwest 
of Sandstone, WA. This initial resource has been estimated 
at 1,070,000 tonnes @ 1.8% Cu and 0.8g/t Au at a 1% Cu 
cutoff. Continued drilling will likely upgrade this resource 
and locate additional resources at other nearby prospects 
such as A Zone.

In the latter part of 2008 a discovery of high grade copper 
sulphide mineralization was made at the large Troy Creek 
project, 180km northeast of Wiluna in Western Australia. 
Drill intersections to date at the Main Gossan prospect have 
consisted of 36m @ 0.8% Cu which included 2m @ 4.7% Cu 
and 3m @ 2.0% Cu; 8m @ 1.5% Cu and 4m @ 3.0% Cu. 

The Wynne base metal project is located 260km northeast 
of Carnarvon in Western Australia. Surface sampling has 
identified highly anomalous base metal gossans outcropping 
over a 7km strike length which represent immediate drill 
targets.

Empire Resources Ltd has a 28% interest in FYI Resources 
Ltd, who owns the large Yarlarweelor uranium project 
125km north of Meekatharra, WA which shows potential 
to host large tonnages of primary uranium mineralization. 
To date limited drilling within a 5km long zone of 
anomalous uranium radioactivity has returned up to 35m @ 
503ppm U3O8 including 5m @ 1,069ppm U3O8, 8m @ 708ppm 
U3O8 and 7.8m @ 588ppm U3O8. 

Figure 1. Project location map

REGISTERED and PRINCIPAL OFFICE 

53 Canning Highway, Victoria Park WA 6100 (cnr Taylor Street) 

Phone +618 9361 3100 Fax +618 9361 3184 

Page 2 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 3

 
 
Yuinmery (WA): 
Copper-Gold – Zinc – PGM Project 
(100% interest and option to earn over 82% interest 
on adjoining tenements)

The Yuinmery copper-gold project is situated 475km 
northeast of Perth, WA. It lies within the Archaean 
Youanmi greenstone belt and covers a synclinal 
sequence of chloritised felsic tuffaceous rocks with 
interbedded sulphide bearing chert horizons. Copper-
gold mineralization, previously identified from a 
number of prospects at Yuinmery, is of volcanogenic 
massive sulphide (VMS) style similar in nature to 
orebodies currently being mined at Golden Grove 
and Jaguar in Western Australia. It occurs as massive 
sulphides associated with chert exhalite horizons, as 
matrix sulphides in lapilli tuff, and associated with 
mafic and ultramafic intrusions.

At one of the Yuinmery prospects, Just Desserts, 
drilling during 2007-2008 intersected high grade 
copper–gold zones with assays such as 23m @ 2.7% Cu, 
1.3g/t Au; 14m @ 2.6% Cu, 1.9g/t Au; 13m @ 2.6% Cu, 

1.7g/t Au; 6m @ 3.8% Cu, 12.9g/t Au and 10m @ 4.2% 

Cu, and 6.0g/t Au.

Based on the above drilling an indicated + inferred 
JORC resource of 1,070,000 tonnes @ 1.8% Cu, 
0.8g/t Au was estimated for the Just Desserts prospect 
and reported on in the March 2009 Quarterly. This 
resource lies between 50 and 250 metres below surface 
and is open at depth. Elsewhere in the world deposits 
of this style of mineralization commonly occur in 
clusters and have been mined to great depths. 

In September 2010 the Company announced it had 
entered into an option agreement with La Mancha 
Resources Ltd to purchase an interest in its tenements 
surrounding the Just Desserts resource (see Figure 
3). This agreement trebled the Company’s tenement 
holding to 227km2 and positions it as a major land 
holder in the base metal rich but underexplored 
Youanmi Greenstone Belt. An airborne EM survey 
completed by La Mancha over their tenements 
identified numerous untested conductive zones 
considered by Empire to be prospective for base metal 
sulphide mineralization (see Figure 5).

During the past year the Company has undertaken 
RAB, RC and diamond drilling programs, surface and 
downhole electromagnetic (EM) surveys and Induced 
Polarisation (IP) surveys at Yuinmery testing fourteen 
different prospects on both Empire’s and La Mancha’s 
tenements. Twenty one holes totalling 4,208m of RC 
drilling, three holes, 774m of diamond drilling and 151 
holes, 6,771m of RAB drilling were completed during 
the year.

A ZONE

RC drilling at A Zone, located 1.3km north of Just 
Desserts, has intersected significant copper–gold and 
zinc mineralization reinforcing the view Yuinmery 
hosts a major VMS system. Just prior to the end of 
year, drilling intersected 5m @ 2.6% Cu, 0.4g/t Au, and 
subsequently, 5m @ 4.4% Cu, 0.4g/t Au within 19m @ 
1.9% Cu, 0.3g/t Au; 4m @ 4.7% Cu, 0.5g/t Au within 7m 
@ 3.2% Cu, 0.3g/t Au and 3m @ 8.2% Zn within 8m @ 
4.0% Zn.

The copper–gold and zinc mineralization at A Zone 
occurs in two horizons which dip eastwards and 
plunge to the north (see Figure 7). Ongoing RC and 
diamond drilling is planned to expand on the known 
mineralization and enable calculation of an initial 
resource.

JUST DESSERTS

Diamond drilling at Just Desserts confirmed the 
mineralization continues at depth with intersections 
of 2m @ 1.8% Cu, 0.3g/t Au, 4g/t Ag and 0.2m @ 5.2% 
Cu, 15g/t Au, 50g/t Ag at a vertical depth of 300m. 
These intersections are thought to have intersected 
the top edge of the south-easterly plunging copper-
gold mineralization (see Figure 6). Further drilling 
is planned down plunge from the currently defined 
resource and also within the resource itself to upgrade 
inferred resources to indicated.

Initial metallurgical testwork on the Just Desserts 
copper–gold resource produced positive results with 
flotation tests on the mineralization giving >95% 
recovery for copper and >85% for gold.

Page 4 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
  
 
 
 
CONSTANTINE

OTHER PROSPECTS

At the Constantine prospect RC and RAB drilling 
intersected large widths of low grade platinum – 
palladium and nickel mineralization in mafic rocks, 
assaying up to 80m @ 0.49g/t Pt+Pd and 0.22% Ni. The 
mineralization, which ocurs in two zones up to 110m 
in combined width, is associated with a prominent 
magnetic horizon traceable under cover for at least 
13km along strike. This magnetic horizon forms part 
of a major layered mafic – ultramafic intusive complex 
in the Youanmi Greenstone Belt. 

Preliminary metallurgical testwork confirmed a high 
percentage of the PGMs at Constantine are hosted 
in sulphide minerals which are amenable to simple 
flotation separation.

Surface prospecting 3.5km south of Constantine 
on the same magnetic horizon located further 
samples over a 500m strike length containing 
highly anomalous platinum, palladium, nickel and 
copper values. The Company applied for and was 
successful in receiving funding of $50,000 under the 
Western Australian Government’s Incentive Scheme 
Co-Funded Drilling Program to drill one diamond 
hole in this area in the coming year.
RAB drilling on lines 0.5 to 1km apart along 4km 
strike length of the magnetic horizon has confirmed it 
is continuously mineralized with low grade PGMs, the 
richest sections being the area mentioned above and 
Constantine. 

RC drilling of a strong EM anomaly at the YC14 
prospect located just south of C Zone, intersected 7m 
of massive pyrite mineralization which assayed 5m @ 
0.5% Cu, 1.0g/t Au. 

Subsequent to year end, RC drilling beneath the 
Smith Well gossan also intersected 8m @ 1.4% Cu, 
0.2g/t Au. Follow up drilling is planned for both these 
prospects.

RC and/or diamond drilling at the B Zone, Trajan, 
Augustus, YC3, 4, 5 and 11 prospects intersected 
zones of weak copper and/or zinc mineralization 
associated with chloritised pyritic tuffs and 
volcanogenic sediments. Subsequent downhole EM 
surveys located strong off hole conductors at the 
Augustus, YC4, YC5 and YC11 prospects which will 
be investigated in the coming year.

RC drilling of the YC 6 and 12 prospects did not 
intersect anything to explain the surface EM anomalies 
while RAB drilling at the Nine Mile Well prospect, 
located 6km southeast of Just Desserts, likewise did 
not locate any significant base or precious metal 
values.

Page 4 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 5

Figure 2.

 
 
 
 
Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Page 6 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
Figure 5.

Page 6 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 7

 
 
Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Page 8 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
Penny’s Find (WA): 
Gold Project – 60% interest

The Penny’s Find project, situated in the Eastern 
Goldfields of Western Australia, lies 50km northeast 
of Kalgoorlie and 30km from the Kanowna Belle 
Gold Mine. Within mining lease M27/156, gold 
mineralization is associated with quartz veining 
developed at or near a sheared contact between basalt 
and sediments.

The Company has previously outlined a gold resource 
at Penny’s Find of 314,000 tonnes @ 5.18g/t Au 
down to a vertical depth of 150m below surface. 
The mineral resource estimate is summarized in the 
following table:

PENNY’S FIND MINERAL RESOURCE

Category 

Measured 

 Indicated 

 Inferred 

 TOTAL 

Tonnes 

79,000 

132,000 

103,000 

314,000 

Grade* (g/t Au) 

Ounces

4.40 

3.98 

7.33 

5.18 

11,177

16,893

24,276

52,316

* grades are based on a minimum cut-off of 0.5g/tAu and high 

assays cut to 25g/tAu

In October 2009 the Company entered into a joint 
venture agreement with Rubicon Resources Ltd 
to acquire an interest in the Mt McLeay tenements 
located immediately north of the Penny’s Find deposit 
(see Figure 10). 

In September 2010 the Company announced to 
the Australian Stock Exchange it had entered into a 
staged sale agreement for Penny’s Find with unlisted 
company Brimstone Resources Ltd. At the election of 
Brimstone, the sale consideration comprises either:

•  Staged cash payments totaling $2.0 million by 

December 2012 for a 100% interest of the Penny’s 
Find project. A 2% gross royalty will also be payable 
on gold produced in excess of the current JORC 
resource of 52,500 ozs gold. 

•  Staged cash payments totaling $0.5 million together 
with exploration and development expenditure of 
up to $3 million by December 2013 for an 80% 
interest in the Penny’s Find project. Any additional 
development costs associated with ERL’s residual 
20% interest will carried by Brimstone and repayable 
from the proceeds of future gold production.

During the past year Brimstone has earned a 40% 
interest in the project by making payments to Empire 
totaling $500,000. Brimstone has also been managing 
exploration on the project, completing programs of 
soil sampling and data validation to assist with open pit 
design. The soil sampling program was successful in 
outlining an anomaly >20ppb Au up to 1km long by 
500m wide with a peak value of 187ppb Au, located 
5km northwest of the Penny’s Find deposit. 

Page 8 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 9

Figure 9.

 
 
 
 
 
  
Figure 10.

Page 10 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
During the past year a ground based EM geophysical 
survey was completed over areas of gossan outcrop. 
The results were inconclusive as strong polarisation 
effects masked late time responses from directly 
beneath the gossans.

Empire Resources was however successful in receiving 
funding of $75,000 under the Western Australian 
Government’s Incentive Scheme Co-Funded Drilling 
Program. This grant will be used to fund an 1,800m 
RC drilling program planned for the first half of 2012.

Wynne (WA): 
Copper Project – 100% interest

The Company holds two exploration licences 
covering an area of 105km2 in the northern Gascoyne 
region of Western Australia, 260km northeast of 
Carnarvon. Previous exploration in the area identified 
extensive gossans containing geochemically anomalous 
copper, lead and zinc values but no drilling was 
ever undertaken. These gossans are associated with 
meta-sedimentary rocks of the Proterozoic Morrissey 
Metamorphic Suite.

Surface rock chip sampling by the Company has 
confirmed the anomalous base metal signature of the 
Wynne gossans which occur in three horizons, one 
of which outcrops over at least a 7km strike length. 
Assays are highly anomalous with maximum values in 
various samples up to 0.25% Cu, 0.39% Pb, 0.14% Zn, 
0.5g/t Au, 4.6% As, 347ppm Bi, 114ppm Mo and 128ppm 

W. 

Page 10 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 11

Figure 11.

 
 
 
 
 
Figure 12.

Troy Creek (WA): 
Copper-Gold – PGM Project – 45% interest

The Troy Creek copper-gold-platinum group 
metal(PGM) project is situated 900km northeast of 
Perth on the northern margin of the Palaeoproterozoic 
Earaheedy Basin where the Company holds tenements 
covering an area of 270km2. 

Several prominent geochemical and magnetic targets 
have been identified in sedimentary rocks within the 
Company’s tenements. These include a large zone of 
multi-element anomalous geochemistry in sedimentary 
rocks which extend along strike for a distance of more 
than 20km. This zone, defined by rock chip sampling, 
soil geochemistry and limited drilling, is anomalous in 
copper, gold, PGM, arsenic, silver and antimony. 

RC drilling during 2008 and 2009 at the Main Gossan 
prospect, which lies within this zone, intersected 
high grade copper sulphide mineralization. Drill 
intersections have included 36m @ 0.76% Cu including 
2m @ 4.65% Cu and 3m @ 1.97% Cu; 8m @ 1.47% Cu 
and 4m @ 3.04% Cu. 

The copper mineralization consists of fine grained 
stratiform copper and iron sulphides in graphitic 
and calcareous shales and shows some similarities 
to “Kupferscheifer Style” mineralization which 
forms world class copper deposits in Germany and 
southwest Poland. These similarities include stratiform 
mineralization over large areas, the presence of 
adjacent haematitic oxidized rocks and comparable 
geochemistry i.e. anomalous copper, silver, arsenic, 
and zinc, with adjacent but discrete platinum group 
metals mineralization eg. 7m @ 0.59g/t Pt + Pd. 

During the March 2011 quarter the Company agreed 
to farm-out terms with the unlisted Sydney-based 
company, Zodiac Resources Pty. Ltd. Under the 
terms of this agreement Zodiac may earn up to a 75% 
interest by spending $7 million on exploration within 
five years. Zodiac will also have the option to acquire 
a 100% interest in the Troy Creek Project within five 
years of commencement of the joint venture at the 
agreed purchase price of $5 million – a figure separate 
to the joint venture exploration commitments.
Zodiac has planned an initial reverse circulation 
(RC) drill programme at the Main Gossan prospect 
comprising 23 RC holes for 3000m. The aim of this 
programme is to intersect and sample the mineralized 
zone in unweathered rock at 100m intervals along 
a 700m strike length. This program should be 
completed by the end of 2011.

Figure 13.

Page 12 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
Yarlarweelor (WA): 
Uranium Project – 28% indirect interest

The Yarlarweelor uranium project is located 125km 
north of Meekatharra in Western Australia.

The Company announced to the Australian Stock 
Exchange in April 2010 the sale of 100% of the 
Yarlarweelor project to FYI Resources Ltd. As part of 
the sale agreement, Empire Resources emerged with a 
direct 32% stake in FYI Resources and two seats on its 
Board of Directors.

Previous exploration during the early 1980’s 
discovered primary uranium mineralization in the 
form of uraninite at five locations within the project 
area. Four of these occurrences are from within the 
Archaean Despair Granite where limited drilling 
showed the uraninite mineralization to be hosted 
in multiple parallel shear zones and the surrounding 
granites.

Since the completion of the Yarlarweelor sale, FYI 
Resources has drilled four diamond holes, totalling 
652 metres at the Kangaroo Ridge and Doris 
prospects. These holes intersected wide zones of 
uranium mineralization associated with biotite rich 
shear zones in granite, confirming the presence of 
significant uranium mineralization at Yarlarweelor. 
Results from the drilling at Kangaroo Ridge included:
•  35m @ 503ppm U3O8 including 5m @ 1,069ppm U3O8 in 

KRD10-02

•  7.8m @ 588ppm U3O8 including 1m @ 1,873ppm U3O8 in 

KRD10-01 and

•  14m @ 221ppm U3O8 including 1m @ 844ppm U3O8  

in KRD10-03

The true widths of mineralization in KRD10-02 
and 03 are estimated to be 9 metres and 3 metres 
respectively. The true width of mineralization in 
KRD10-01 is estimated to be 4 metres. The uranium 
mineralization at Kangaroo Ridge currently extends 
for 200 metres along strike and to 200 metres depth 
as defined by recent and historical drilling. This 
mineralization remains open both along strike and at 
depth.

The single diamond core hole drilled at the Doris 
prospect intersected seven zones of biotite schist 
ranging in true widths from 1.3m to 4.0m. Better 
assays from these biotite schist zones and adjacent 
granites are: 2.94m @ 184ppm U3O8, 5.37m @ 185ppm 
U3O8 and 7.23m @ 153 U3O8.

Preliminary metallurgical testwork on a composite 
core sample from hole KRD10-01 at Kangaroo 
Ridge, gave an 89% extraction of uranium to liquor 
in 12 hours and 91% extraction in 24 hours under 
mild sulphuric acid leaching conditions. This testwork 
confirms the potential for a significant proportion 
of the Yarlarweelor uranium mineralization to be 
amenable to recovery by simple acid leaching. 

Results from a previous airborne radiometric survey 
and geological mapping indicate shear zones with a 
combined strike length in excess of 25km exist within 
FYI’s tenements and may be prospective for uranium 
mineralization. 

Page 12 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 13

Figure 14.

 
 
 
 
 
Figure 15.

Figure 16.

Page 14 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
The coming year will see exploration efforts 
concentrate again on the Doris – Kangaroo Ridge 
trend and on uranium anomalies to the immediate 
north and west of Kangaroo Ridge.

David Sargeant
Managing Director

September 2011

During the past year FYI Resources completed a 
detailed aerial radiometric and magnetic survey over 
E52/2478 highlighting some prominent thorium 
anomalies. After completing an archaeological survey 
over parts of E52/2095, the Company also undertook 
a shallow RAB drilling program of 36 holes, 1,306 
metres testing a number of thorium, magnetic and 
uranium anomalies. Due to access problems the RAB 
drilling program was restricted to the central portion 
of the project area separate from the areas previously 
drilled at Kangaroo Ridge and Doris. Only low level 
uranium and thorium values were returned from this 
drilling.

Results from a previous airborne radiometric survey 
and geological mapping indicate shear zones with a 
combined strike length in excess of 25km exist within 
FYI’s tenements and may be prospective for uranium 
mineralization. A program of field checking and 
sampling of aerial radiometric anomalies has confirmed 
significant uranium anomalies exist to the north and 
west of Kangaroo Ridge, none of which have been 
drill tested to date (see Figure 16).

Page 14 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 15

Competent Person’s Statement

The information in this Annual Report that relates to Exploration Results and Resources have been compiled by Mr. David Ross B.Sc. M.Sc., 
who is an employee of the Company. He is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and the Australian Institute of 
Geoscientists. He has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposits under consideration and to the activity 
to which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration 
Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. David Ross consents to the inclusion in this Annual Report of the matters based on his information 
in the form and context in which it appears.

 
 
 
 
Notes  on  the  Resource s  held   b y 
Em pir e  Resour ce s  Limited

Penny’s Find Resource

An updated resource estimate for the Penny’s Find 
gold mineralization was completed and announced to 
the market on 8 August 2007 and 12 October 2007.  
There has been no change to the resource since that 
time.

The mineral resource by category is 314,000 tonnes 
averaging 5.2 g/t gold down to a vertical depth of 
150m below surface.  

The mineral resource above 0.5 g/t gold is 
summarised in the following table. 

Penny’s Find 
Classified mineral resources – August 2007
Category 

Grade* (g/t Au) 

Tonnes 

Measured 

 Indicated 

 Inferred 

  TOTAL 

79,000 

132,000 

103,000 

314,000 

4.40 

3.98 

7.33 

5.18 

Ounces

11,177

16,893

24,276

52,316

* grades are based on a minimum cut-off of 0.5g/tAu and high 

assays cut to 25g/tAu

Resource modelling consultants Datageo calculated a 
JORC compliant in situ resource estimate, utilising 
all drill hole information available on mining lease 
M27/156 up to the end of June 2007.  

The resource grade was estimated using ordinary 
kriging based on the drill hole data composited 
downhole to 1m intervals within constraining shapes 
representing the mineralization.  Assumed specific 
gravity values used were: oxide 2.0t/m3; transitional 
2.2t/m3; fresh  2.5t/m3.

Yuinmery Resource
A resource estimate for the Just Desserts prospect 
at Yuinmery was completed and announced to the 
market on 9 April 2009.

There has been no change in the resource since that 
time.

The mineral resource by category to a depth of 
250m below surface is reported below.  The resource 
comprises no oxide mineralization, only transitional 
and fresh. 

Just Desserts 
Classified Mineral Resources – March 2009 

Category 

Tonnes  Grade*  Grade*  Grade*

Cu% 

Au g/t 

Ag g/t

1%Cu cutoff 

Indicated 

104,000  1.65 

Inferred 

966,000  1.84 

TOTAL 

1,070,000  1.82 

1.5%Cu cutoff  Indicated 

46,000  2.11 

Inferred 

536,000  2.34 

TOTAL 

582,000  2.33 

0.86 

0.77 

0.78 

1.14 

0.92 

0.93 

1.32

2.12

2.06

1.58

2.68

2.61

*High assays have been cut to 9%Cu, 20g/tAu and 10g/tAg.

Resource modelling consultants Datageo calculated a 
JORC compliant in situ resource estimate, utilising all 
drill hole information available on Prospecting Licence 
P57/1215 up to the end of June 2008.  

The resource grade was estimated using ordinary 
kriging based on the drill hole data composited 
down hole to 1m intervals within constraining shapes 
representing the mineralization.  Assumed specific 
gravity values used were: transitional 2.7t/m3; fresh  
3.2t/m3.

Competent Persons Statement

The information is this report concerning the Mineral Resources 
for the Penny’s Find Deposit and the Just Desserts Deposit at 
Yuinmery have been estimated by Mr Peter Ball B.Sc who is a 
director of DataGeo Geological Consultants and is a member of  
the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM).  
Mr Ball has sufficient experience which is relevant to the styles of 
mineralization and types of deposit under consideration and qualifies 
as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the 
“Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral 
Resources and Ore Reserves”.  Mr Ball consents to the inclusion in 
the public release of the matters based on his information in the form 
and context in which it appears.

Page 16 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
E MPIRE  RESOURCES  LIMITED   A ND  CONT ROLL ED  ENT IT Y  ABN  32  092  471  513

FOR  THE  YEAR  ENDED  3 0  JUNE  201 1

Page 16 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 17

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
6.

Empire Resources Limited  
Directors' Report

Directors’ Report 

Your directors submit their report on Empire Resources Limited and its controlled entity for the financial year ended 30 
June 2011. 

DIRECTORS 

The company’s directors in office during the financial period and until the date of this report are as follows. Directors 
were in office for the entire period unless otherwise stated. 

Tom Revy - Chairman (Non-Executive) – BAppSc. Grad Dip Bus.  

Mr  Revy  is  a  mining  professional  with  in  excess  of  28 years  experience  in  the mining industry  to  date  including 
operations,  process  design  and  commissioning,  technical  and  general  management,  business  development,  project 
and company evaluation and corporate management. Countries where extensive work has been undertaken include 
Australia, PNG, Southern and Central Africa, Central and South America and China.

David Sargeant - Managing Director - BSc. MAusIMM 

Mr  Sargeant  –  who  holds  a  Bachelor  of  Science  degree  in  economic  geology  from  the  University  of  Sydney  –  has 
more  than  40  years  experience  as  a  geologist, consultant  and  company  director.  As  such, he  has  been involved  in 
numerous mineral exploration, ore deposit evaluation and mining development projects and is a member of AusIMM 
and the Geological Society of Australia. 

During his career, Mr Sargeant has held a range of senior positions, including that of senior geologist with Newmont 
Pty Ltd and senior supervisory geologist with Esso Australia Ltd at the time of the Harbour Lights Gold Mine discovery 
and  development.  Further,  Mr  Sargeant  was  the  first  chief  geologist  at  Telfer  Gold  Mine  during  exploration, 
development and production at that project. In addition, he was exploration manager for the Adelaide Petroleum NL 
group of companies, manager of resources development for Sabminco NL and a technical director of Western Reefs 
Limited during the period in which that company became a successful producer at the Dalgaranga Gold Project. 

Mr Sargeant has been a director of the following listed companies during the past three years. 

 ynapmoC

 noitisoP

 detnioppA

  dtL secruoseR IYF

 rotceriD evitucexe-noN

 9002/11/03

Adrian Jessup - Executive Director - BSc. MAusIMM 

Mr Jessup also holds a Bachelor of Science degree (with honours) in economic geology from the University of Sydney 
and  has  more  than  40  years  continuous  experience  as  a  geologist,  company  director  and  consultant  involved  in 
mineral  exploration,  ore  deposit  evaluation  and  mining.  He  is  a  member  of  AusIMM,  the  Geological  Society  of 
Australia and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. 

For the last 16 years, Mr Jessup has operated a geological consulting company. During that time, he was a founding 
director  of  Sylvania  Resources  Limited  and  remained  on  the  board  for  two  years.  Prior  to  that,  Mr  Jessup  was 
managing director of Giralia Resources NL for eight years, from the company's inception in 1987. Previously, he had 
worked for AMAX Exploration Inc., as a senior geologist and as regional manager in charge of that company's mineral 
exploration in Western Australia. 

Mr Jessup has been a director of the following listed companies during the past three years. 

 ynapmoC

 noitisoP

 detnioppA

  dtL secruoseR IYF

 rotceriD evitucexe-noN

 9002/11/03

MANAGEMENT 
Simon Storm - Company Secretary – BCom. BCompt(Hons). CA, FCIS 

Mr Storm is a Chartered Accountant with over 27 years of Australian and international experience in the accounting 
profession  and  commerce.  He  commenced  his  career  with  Deloitte  Haskins  &  Sells  in  Africa  then  London  before 
joining Price Waterhouse in Perth. 

He has held various senior finance and/or company secretarial roles with listed and unlisted entities in the banking, 
resources, construction, telecommunications and property development industries. In the last 9 years he has provided 

1

Page 18 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  
Directors' Report

consulting  services  covering  accounting,  financial  and  company  secretarial  matters  to  various  companies  in  these 
sectors. 

David Ross – Exploration Manager – BSc(Hons). MSc. MAusIMM 

Mr  Ross  holds  a  Bachelor  of  Science  degree  (with  honours)  in  geology  from  Aberdeen  University,  Scotland  and  a 
Master of Science degree in economic geology from McMaster University in Canada. He is a member of the AusIMM, 
the Geological Society of Australia and the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. 

With over 25 years experience as an exploration geologist in Western Australia his career has seen him involved with 
numerous mineral exploration, ore deposit evaluation and mine development projects for both gold and base metals. 
He has held senior geologist positions with Brunswick NL and Giralia Resources and was geological superintendent 
for Australian Resources at the Gidgee Gold Mine. Most recently he held the position of chief geologist with De Grey 
Mining Ltd where he was instrumental in the discovery of the Orchard Well VMS deposits. 

PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES 

During the period the principal activities of the Company consisted of mineral exploration and evaluation of properties 
in Australia. There has been no significant change in these activities during the financial period. 

Dividends 

No dividends have been paid during the period and no dividends have been recommended by the directors. 

Result for the Financial Period 

Loss from ordinary activities after provision for income tax was $1,907,860 (2010: $522,353) 

REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 

During the year, the Company continued exploration activities at its various exploration projects: 

YUINMERY:  Advanced Copper–Gold project WA (100% interest) 

 -  Entered into an option agreement to purchase over 75% interest in an extra 149 square km of tenements adjoining 
Empire’s;  
-  dril ling at  the Just Desserts prospect intersects  mineralization  down  plunge from existing resource and reinforces 
that Yuinmery could be a major VMS copper-gold system; 

-  initial metallurgical testwork of Just Desserts mineralization confirms positive expectations for favourable recoveries; 

-  drilling at A Zone prospect 2km north of Just Desserts prospect intersects encouraging copper and zinc grades; 

-  drilling continues at other targets for copper and gold;  

  - widespread low grade platinum- palladium-nickel mineralisation identified 7km north east of Just Desserts 
prospect; and 

-  awarded $50,000 under the Western Australian Government’s Incentive Scheme Co-Funded Drilling Program.  The 
grant will be used to fund a diamond drilling program during the next financial year. 

PENNY’S FIND: Gold project WA (60% interest) 

 - Sale of Penny’s Find project for up to $2 million cash plus royalty; 

 -  Brimstone  Resources  Ltd  has  paid  an  initial  $500,000,  is  continuing  to  earn  into  the  project  and  has  taken  over  
management of exploration; and 

 - planning to develop an open pit has commenced. 

TROY CREEK: Copper-Gold-PGM project WA (100% interest) 

 - Farmout offer for Troy Creek project accepted  from Zodiac Resources. Zodiac to spend $3  million to earn a 55% 
interest over a 5 year period; and 

 - Zodiac to manage and carry out an initial reverse circulation (RC) drill programme early in the next financial year. 

2

Page 18 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 19

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  
Directors' Report

WYNNE (WA): Copper Project- 100% interest 

 - awarded $75,000 under the Western Australian Government’s Incentive Scheme Co-Funded Drilling Program; and  

 - grant will be used to fund a RC drilling program planned  during the next financial year. 

YARLARWEELOR (WA): Uranium project (28% indirect interest) 

 - the  project  owner, FYI Resources  Limited,   completed further detailed airborne radiometric  and magnetic surveys 
over the entire area; and 

 -  also  completed  a  RAB  drilling  program  consisting  of  thirty  six  holes  totalling  1,306  metres  testing  a  number  of  
uranium, thorium and magnetic anomalies. 

CORPORATE 

 - company raised $2.78 million in capital, before costs, through a series of placements during the December 2010  

 -  9.4 million shares and 5 million shares were issued in October and November 2010 respectively, at 6.4 cents.  

 -  further placement was completed in December 2010 of 15.7 million shares at 12 cents.  

In the opinion of the Directors there were no other significant changes in the state of affairs of the Company. 

REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) 

This report details the amount and nature of remuneration of each director of the Company and the executives 
receiving the highest remuneration. 

Remuneration Policy 

The principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration are applied through a remuneration policy 
which  ensures  the  remuneration  package  properly  reflects  the  person’s  duties  and  responsibilities  and  that  the 
remuneration is competitive in attracting, retaining and motivating people of the highest quality. 

The  remuneration  policy,  setting  the  terms  and  conditions  for  the  executive  directors  has  been  developed  by  the 
board  after seeking professional advice  and  taking into account  market conditions and comparable salary  levels for 
companies of a similar size and operating in similar sectors. 

The  remuneration  policy  is  to  provide  a  fixed  remuneration  component.  The  board  believes  that  this  remuneration 
policy  is  appropriate  given  the  stage  of  development  of  the  Company  and  the  activities  which  it  undertakes  and  is 
appropriate in aligning Directors’ objectives with shareholder and businesses objectives. 

The remuneration framework has regard to shareholders’ interests in the following ways: 

• 

• 

Focuses on sustained growth as well as focusing the directors on key non-financial drivers of value, and  

Attracts and retains high calibre directors. 

The remuneration framework has regard to directors’ interests in the following ways: 

• 

• 

• 

• 

Rewards capability and experience, 

Reflects competitive reward for contributions to shareholder growth, 

Provides a clear structure for earning rewards, and 

Provides recognition for contribution. 

Non-executive directors 

The  board  policy  is  to  remunerate  non-executive  directors  at  market  rates  for  comparable  companies  for  time, 
commitment  and  responsibilities.  The  Board  determines  payments  to  the  non-executive  director  and  reviews  their 
remuneration  annually,  based  on  market  practice,  duties  and  accountability.  Independent  external  advice  is  sought 
when  required.  The  maximum  aggregate  amount  of  fees  that  can  be  paid  to  directors  is  subject  to  approval  by 
shareholders at a General Meeting. Fees for non-executive directors are not linked to the performance of the Group. 
However,  to  align  directors’  interests  with  shareholder  interests,  the  directors  are  encouraged  to  hold  shares  in  the 
Company and may receive options. 

3

Page 20 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  
Directors' Report

The Directors have resolved that non-executive director’s fees will be $30,000 per annum for the Chairman, inclusive 
of statutory superannuation contributions. Shareholders have approved aggregate remuneration for all non-executive 
directors at an amount of $100,000 per annum.  Where applicable, superannuation contributions of 9% are paid on 
these fees as required by law. 

Share-based compensation  

To ensure that the Company has appropriate mechanisms to continue to attract and retain the services of Directors 
and Employees of a high calibre, the Company has established the Empire Resources Limited Share Plan (“SP”) and 
the Empire Resources Option Plan. 

The Directors consider the plans are an appropriate method to: 

a) reward Directors and Employees for their past performance; 
b) provide long-term incentives to participate in the Company’s future growth; 
c) motivate Directors and Employees and generate loyalty in Employees; and 
d) assist to retain the services of valuable Employees. 

The value attributed to the share based compensation for the year is as follows: 

Directors
Mr T Revy 

Mr D Sargeant

Mr A Jessup

Specified 
Executives
Mr S Storm 

Year 
granted

2010

2007

2010

2007

2010

 -

100%

 -

100%

 -

2007
2010

100%
 -

Vested
%

Forfeited %

Financial years in 
which 
shares/options 
may vest

Total value of 
grant vested
$

Minimum total 
value of grant yet 
to vest
$

Maximum total 
value of grant 
yet to vest
$

-

-

-

-

-

-
-

2010-13

2008-11

2010-13

2008-11

2010-13

2008-11
2010-13

-

104,441

-

69,627

-

48,739
-

7,500

-

7,500

-

7,500

-
7,500

7,500

-

7,500

-

7,500

-
7,500

A    
Remuneration 
consisting of 
shares

B
Value at issue 
date
$

C
Value at exercise 
date
$

D
Value at lapse 
date
$

E
Total of 
columns B-D
$

Directors
Mr T Revy 

Mr D Sargeant
Mr A Jessup
Specified Executives
Mr S Storm 

0%
5%
5%

10%

-
-
-

-

-
61,500
41,000
-
28,700

-
-
-
-
-

-
61,500
41,000

28,700

A = 

B = 

C = 

D = 

The percentage of the value of remuneration consisting of shares, based on the value of shares expensed 
during the current year. 
The value at issue date calculated in accordance with AASB 2 Share-based Payment of shares issued 
during the year as part of remuneration. 
The value at exercise date of shares that were issued as part of remuneration and were exercised during 
the year, being the intrinsic value of the shares at that date. 
The value at lapse date of shares that were issued as part of remuneration and that lapsed during the year. 
Lapsed shares refer to shares that vested but expired due to the term of the loan expiring. 

No shares were issued during the year upon the exercise of options. 

4

Page 20 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 21

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                  
                      
                  
                              
                          
                  
                      
                  
                              
                          
                  
                      
                  
                              
                          
                  
                      
Empire Resources Limited  
Directors' Report

Executives 
Executive Directors receive either a salary plus superannuation guarantee contributions as required by law, currently 
set at 9%, or provide their services via a consultancy arrangement. Directors do not receive any retirement benefits.  
Individuals  may,  however,  choose  to  sacrifice  part  of  their  salary  to  increase  payments  towards  superannuation. 
Options are not issued as part of remuneration for long term incentives. 

All remuneration paid to directors and executives is valued at cost to the Company and expensed.  

Compensation of Key Management Personnel for the year ended 30 June 2011. 

The following table discloses the remuneration of the Key Management Personnel (Directors and executive officers) 
of the Company.  The information in this table is audited. 

Short-term 
Benefits

Post-
employment 
benefits

Share-based 
payments

Directors

Specified Directors
Non-Executive
Mr T Revy 2

Mr A Griffin 1

Executive

Mr D Sargeant

Mr A Jessup3

Total Specified Directors

Specified Executives

Mr S Storm 

Total Specified 
Executives

2011

2010

2011

2010

2011

2010

2011

2010

2011

2010

2011

2010

2011

2010

Directors
Fees

Consulting 
Fees

Total

Value of shares 
& options

Total

30,000

15,000

-

15,000

-

-

-

-

30,000

-

30,000

15,000

-

15,000

-

-

-

-

180,000

180,000

164,000

140,000

108,000

320,000

164,000

140,000

108,000

350,000

30,000

272,000

302,000

-

-

-

-

37,800

34,800

37,800

34,800

37,800

34,800

37,800

34,800

-

2,500

32,500

34

-

15,034

-

23,209

38,209

31,511

211,511

34,848

198,848

21,841

161,841

23,243

131,243

55,852

405,852

81,334

383,334

16,039

53,839

16,280

51,080

16,039

53,839

16,280

51,080

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1 Resigned 8 January 2010
2 Appointed 8 January 2010
3 Reduced fee whilst acting as an executive officer for FYI Resources Ltd for 5 months

5

Page 22 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
                       
              
                    
                       
                    
                       
                 
                    
                       
                       
                       
              
                    
                       
                 
                       
                 
                       
                 
                       
                 
                       
                       
                       
                 
                       
                 
                       
                 
                       
                 
                       
 
Empire Resources Limited  
Directors' Report

Employment contracts 

– Mr D Sargeant 

By  agreement  dated  24  October  2009, the  Company  and  Kirkdale  Holdings  Pty  Ltd  (ACN  009  096 388)  ('Kirkdale') 
agreed  the  terms  and  conditions  under  which  Kirkdale  would  provide  the  services  of  Mr  Sargeant  as  Managing 
Director of the Company. 

The agreement has: 
(a) 
(b) 

(c) 

a term of three years; 
requires the payment to Kirkdale of a fee of $15,000 (GST excl) per month (increasing by 10% each year) 
and reimbursement of expenses;  
provisions  requiring  the  payment  of  a  termination  benefit  of  50%  of  the  amount  due  on  termination  of  the 
agreement.  

– Mr A Jessup 

By  agreement  dated  24  October  2009,  the  Company  and  Murilla  Exploration  Pty  Ltd  (ACN  068  277  190)  ('Murilla') 
agreed the terms and conditions under which Murilla would provide the services of Mr Jessup as an executive officer 
of the Company. 

The agreement has: 
(a) 
(b) 

(c) 

a term of three years; 
requires the payment to Murilla of a fee of $15,000 (GST excl) per month (increasing by 10% each year) and 
reimbursement of expenses;  
provisions  requiring  the  payment  of  a  termination  benefit  of  50%  of  the  amount  due  on  termination  of  the 
agreement.  

Directors  may  be  paid  additional  fees  for  special  duties  or  services  outside  the  scope  of  the  ordinary  duties  of  a 
Director. Directors will also be reimbursed for all reasonable expenses incurred in the course of their duties. 

End of Remuneration Report. 

Share Options 

At the date of this report unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option are: 

Grant Date

Date of 
Expiry

Exercise
Price $

2-Jun-10
25-Jun-10
9-Aug-11

2-Jun-13
25-Jun-13
9-Aug-14

0.15 
0.14 
0.09 

Number 
under 
Option

8,227,729 
2,700,000 
1,500,000 

12,427,729   

Directors’ Interest 

The relevant interest of each director in the shares and options over shares issued by the Company at the date of this 
report is as follows: 

Director

Mr T Revy
Mr D Sargeant
Mr A Jessup

Company Performance 

Number of Ordinary Shares
Indirect

Direct

Number of Options

Direct

Indirect

-
-
722,222

710,000
6,100,000
1,345,333

500,000
-
-

-
500,000
500,000

Comments on performance are set out in the review of operations. 

Significant Changes in the State of Affairs 

There were no other significant changes in the state of affairs of the Company other than those noted in the review of 
operations. 

6

Page 22 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 23

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                          
                           
                          
                           
                           
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  
Directors' Report

Likely Developments and Expected Results 

Disclosure of likely developments in the operations of the Company and the expected results of those operations in 
future  financial  years,  and  any  further  information,  has  not  been  included  in  this  report  because,  in  the  reasonable 
opinion of the Directors to do so would be likely to prejudice the business activities of the Company. 

Environmental Regulation 

The  Company’s  operations  were  subject  to  environmental  regulations  under  both  Commonwealth  and  State 
legislation in relation to its exploration activities. 

The directors are not aware of any breaches during the period covered by this report. 

Meetings of Directors 

The following table sets out the number of meetings of the Company’s directors held during the period ended 30 June 
2011 and the number of meetings attended by each director. 

Director

Mr Thomas Revy
Mr David Sargeant
Mr Adrian Jessup
A - meetings attended
B - meetings held whilst a director

Directors’ Meetings
B
5
5
5

A
5
5
5

As at the date of this report the Company has not formed any committees as the directors consider that at present the 
size  of  the  Company  does  not  warrant  such.  Audit,  corporate  governance,  director  nomination  and  remuneration 
matters are all handled by the full board. 

Proceedings on Behalf of the Company 
No person has applied to the Court under Section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on 
behalf of the Company, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the Company is a party, for the purpose of taking 
responsibility on behalf of the Company for all or part of the proceedings. 

No proceedings have been brought or intervened in on behalf of the Company with leave of the Court under Section 
237 of the Corporations Act 2001. 

Indemnification and Insurance of Directors and Officers 

Indemnification 
The  Company  has  agreed  to  indemnify  current  directors  and  officers  and  past  directors  and  officers  against  all 
liabilities to another person (other than the Company or a related body corporate), including legal expenses that may 
arise from their position as directors and officers of the Company and its controlled entity, except where the liability 
arises  out  of  conduct  involving  a  lack  of  good  faith.    The  agreement  stipulates  that  the  Company  will  meet  the  full 
amount of any such liabilities, including costs and expenses. 

Insurance 
The  directors  have  not  included  details  of  the  amount  of  the  premium  paid  in  respect  of  the  directors’  and  officers’ 
liability insurance contracts, as such disclosure is prohibited under the terms of the contract. 

Events subsequent to reporting date 

No  matter  or  circumstance  has  arisen,  since  the  end  of  the  financial  year,  which  significantly  affected,  or  may 
significantly affect, the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in 
subsequent financial years. 

Non-audit Services 

The Company  may decide  to  employ the auditor on  assignments  additional to their statutory  audit duties where the 
auditor’s expertise and experience with the Company and/or the Group are important. 

Details  of  the  amounts  paid  or  payable  to  the  auditor  (HLB  Mann  Judd)  for  audit  and  non-audit  services  provided 
during the year are set out below.   

7

Page 24 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  
Directors' Report

During the period, the following fees were paid or payable for services 
provided by the auditors of the parent entity HLB Mann Judd, its related 
practices and  non-related audit firms: 
Assurance Services 
HLB Mann Judd (Current Auditor) 
1.  Audit services 

Audit and review of financial reports and other audit work under the 
Corporations Act 2001 
Total remuneration for audit services 
2.  Other assurance services 

Tax related 

Total remuneration for other assurance services 

Total remuneration for assurance services 

Auditors Independence Declaration 

Consolidated 

Year ended  
30 June 2011 
$

Year ended 
30 June 2010 
$

19,025 

19,025 

18,500 

18,500 

- 

- 

- 

- 

19,025 

18,500 

Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 requires the company’s auditors, HLB Mann Judd, to provide the directors 
with  a  written  Independence  Declaration  in  relation  to  their  audit  of  the  financial  report  for  the  year  ended  30  June 
2011.  This written Auditor’s Independence Declaration is attached to the Auditor’s Independent Audit Report to the 
members and forms part of this Director’s Report. 

Signed in accordance with a resolution of Directors. 

_________________ 
D Sargeant 
Managing Director  
Perth, Western Australia  
8 September 2011 

Page 24 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 25

8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7.

STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2011 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  

Revenue from continuing operations

Depreciation expense
Exploration expense
Employee benefits expense
Management fee expense
Directors fees
Accounting expense
Consultancy expense
Share-based payment
ASX expense
Corporate relations expense
Insurance expense
Other expenses 
Share of loss of equity accounted investees

Loss before income tax
Income tax benefit
Net loss for the year

Other comprehensive income
Share of comprehensive loss of equity accounted investees

Income tax relating to components of other comprehensive 
income
Other comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax
Total comprehensive loss for the year

Loss per share for loss from continuing operations 
attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the 
Company
Basic and diluted loss per share (cents per share)

Consolidated

Note

2011
$

2010
$

2

3
3

8

4

5

523,311

1,534,161

(20,691)
(1,575,018)
(27,215)
(315,254)
(30,000)
(58,073)
(26,825)
(108,270)
(17,127)
(48,203)
(15,639)
(139,124)
(253,754)

(2,111,882)

204,022 
(1,907,860)

-

(139,664)

-
(139,664)
(2,047,524)

(23,577)
(1,147,416)
(20,032)
(254,772)
(30,000)
(48,265)
(6,658)
(113,909)
(15,415)
(27,134)
(15,482)
(110,695)
(243,159)

(522,353)

- 
(522,353)

- 

- 

- 
- 
(522,353)

(1.65)

(0.61)

The above Statement of Comprehensive Income 
 should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes. 

9

Page 26 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 
AS AT 30 JUNE 2011 

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents

Trade and other receivables

Total Current Assets

NON-CURRENT ASSETS

Investments accounted for using the equity method

Plant and equipment

Total Non-Current Assets

TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES

CURRENT LIABILITIES

Trade and other payables

Total Current Liabilities

TOTAL LIABILITIES

NET ASSETS

EQUITY

Issued capital

Reserves

Accumulated losses

TOTAL EQUITY

Consolidated

Note

2011

$

2010

$

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

1,781,147 

310,855 

2,092,002 

863,227 

23,691 

886,918 

595,674 

70,861 

666,535 

1,256,645 

34,427 

1,291,072 

2,978,920 

1,957,607 

297,851 

297,851 

130,106 

130,106 

297,851 

130,106 

2,681,069 

1,827,501 

14,516,700 

847,444 

(12,683,075)

11,723,878 

739,174 

(10,635,551)

2,681,069 

1,827,501 

The above Statement of Financial Position 
 should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes. 

10 

Page 26 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 27

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9.

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2011 

Balance at  1 July 2009
Shares issued during the year
Options issued during the year
Equity issue expenses
Loss for the year
Balance at  30 June 2010

Balance at  1 July 2010
Shares issued during the year
Options issued during the year
Equity issue expenses
Loss for the year
Other comprehensive loss for the year
Balance at  30 June 2011

Consolidated Group

Issued Capital 
$

Accumulated 
Losses
$

Option Reserve
$

Total
$

10,269,731 
1,539,691 
- 
(85,544)

- 
11,723,878 

11,723,878 
2,977,700 
- 
(184,878)
- 
- 
14,516,700 

(10,113,198)
- 
- 
- 

(522,353)
(10,635,551)

(10,635,551)
- 
- 
- 
(1,907,860)
(139,664)
(12,683,075)

625,265 
- 
113,909 
- 

- 
739,174 

739,174 
- 
108,270 
- 
- 
- 
847,444 

781,798 
1,539,691 
113,909 
(85,544)

(522,353)
1,827,501 

1,827,501 
2,977,700 
108,270 
(184,878)
(1,907,860)
(139,664)
2,681,069 

The above Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes 

11 

Page 28 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
10.

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2011 

Cashflows from Operating Activities
Receipts from customers
Payments to suppliers and employees
Interest received

Consolidated

Note

2011
$

2010
$

-
(683,871)
41,932 

11,000 
(537,650)
24,357 

Net cash used in operating activities

6(i)

(641,939)

(502,293)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Purchase of plant and equipment
Sale of prospect
Exploration and evaluation expenditure

(9,955)
500,000 
(1,453,408)

- 
- 
(1,167,660)

Net cash used in investing activities

(963,363)

(1,167,660)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from issue of equity securities
Equity securities issue costs

2,977,700 
(186,925)

1,539,691 
(83,497)

Net cash provided by financing activities

2,790,775 

1,456,194 

Net increase / (decrease) in cash held
Cash at the beginning of the financial year

1,185,473 
595,674 

(213,759)
809,433 

Cash at the end of the financial year

6

1,781,147 

595,674 

The above Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction 
with the accompanying notes. 

12 

Page 28 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 29

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11.

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

Empire Resources Limited  

1. 

Statement of Significant Accounting Policies 

The  financial  report  covers  the  consolidated  entity  of  Empire  Resources  Limited  (“Empire”)  and  its  controlled 
entity  and  Empire  as  an  individual  parent  entity.    Empire  is  a  listed  public  company  limited  by  shares, 
incorporated and domiciled in Australia. 

(a) 

Basis of Preparation 

This general purpose financial report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, 
Australian  Accounting  Interpretations,  other  authoritative  pronouncements  of  the  Australian  Accounting 
Standards Board (AASB) and the Corporations Act 2001.  It is prepared on the basis of historical costs.  The 
financial report is presented in Australian dollars. 

The  financial  report  complies  with  Australian  Accounting  Standards,  which  include  Australian  equivalents  to 
International  Financial  Reporting  Standards  (AIFRS).    Compliance  with  AIFRS  ensures  that  the  consolidated 
financial report, comprising the financial statements and notes thereto, complies with the International Financial 
Reporting Standards (IFRS). 

The financial report was authorised for issue by the Board on 8 September 2011. 

The following is a summary of the material accounting policies adopted by the Group in the preparation of the 
financial  report.    The  accounting  policies  have  been  consistently  applied  by  the  controlled  entity  and  are 
consistent with those in the June 2010 financial report. 

(b) 

Going Concern 

As disclosed in the Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Group recorded operating losses of $1,907,860 
(2010:  $522,353)  and  as  disclosed  in  the  Statement  of  Cash  Flows,  the  Group  recorded  cash  outflows  from 
operating activities of $641,939 (2010: $502,293) and investing activities of $963,363 (2010: $1,167,660) and a 
cash  inflow  from  financing  activities  of  $2,790,775  (2010:  $1,456,194).  Cash  flows  from  financing  activities 
arose from capital raisings that are disclosed in Note 11(a). After consideration of these financial conditions, the 
Directors  have  assessed  the  following  matters  in  relation  to  the  adoption  of  the  going  concern  basis  of 
accounting by the Group: 

 

 

 

The Group has successfully completed capital raisings during the year as disclosed in Note 11(a) and has 
the ability to continue doing so on a timely basis, pursuant to the Corporations Act 2001, as is budgeted to 
occur in the twelve month period from the date of this financial report;  
The Group has net current assets of $1,794,151 (2010: $536,429) at balance date and expenditure 
commitments for the next 12 months of  $344,299 (2010:$752,054), as disclosed in Note 14 (ii), and 
retains the ability to scale down its operations to conserve cash, in the event that the capital raisings are 
delayed or partial; and 
The company and Group have the ability, if required, to undertake mergers, acquisitions or restructuring 
activity or to wholly or in part, dispose of interests in mineral exploration and development assets. 

Due to the above matters, the Directors believe that it is reasonably foreseeable that the company and Group 
will  continue  as  a  going  concern  and  that  it  is  appropriate  that  this  basis  of  accounting  be  adopted  in  the 
preparation of the financial statements. 

(c) 

Basis of Consolidation 

A  controlled  entity  is  any  entity  that  Empire  Resources  Limited  has  the  power  to  control  the  financial  and 
operating policies of the entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. 

A list of the controlled entity is contained in Note 8 to the financial statements. The controlled entity has a June 
financial year end. 

All  inter-company  balances  and  transactions  between  entities  in  the  consolidated  group,  including  any 
unrealised  profits  or  losses,  have  been  eliminated  on  consolidation.  Accounting  policies  of  subsidiaries  have 
been changed where necessary to ensure consistencies with those policies applied by the parent entity. 

Where  a  controlled  entity  enters  or  leaves  the  consolidated  group  during  the  year,  their operating  results  are 
included/excluded from the date control was obtained or until the date control ceased. 

13

Page 30 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

1. 

Statement of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) 

Business Combinations 
Business combinations occur where control over another business is obtained and results in the consolidation 
of its assets and liabilities. All business combinations, including those involving entities under common control, 
are accounted for by applying the purchase method. The purchase method requires an acquirer of the business 
to be identified and for the cost of the acquisition and fair values of identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent 
liabilities to be determined as at acquisition date, being the date that control is obtained. Cost is determined as 
the  aggregate  of  fair  values  of  assets  given,  equity  issued  and  liabilities  assumed  in  exchange  for  control 
together  with  costs  directly  attributable  to  the  business  combination.  Any  deferred  consideration  payable  is 
discounted to present value using the entity’s incremental borrowing rate. 

(d) 

Investment in associated entities 

The  Group’s  investment  in  its  associate  is  accounted  for  using  the  equity  method  of  accounting  in  the 
consolidated financial statements, after initially being recognised at cost. The associate is an entity in which the 
Group has significant influence and which is neither a subsidiary nor a joint venture. 

Under the equity method, the investment in the associate is carried in the consolidated statement of financial 
position  at  cost  plus  post-acquisition  changes  in  the  Group's  share  of  net  assets  of  the  associate.  Goodwill 
relating  to  an  associate  is  included  in  the  carrying  amount  of  the  investment  and  is  not  amortised.  After 
application  of  the  equity  method,  the  Group  determines  whether  it  is  necessary  to  recognise  any  additional 
impairment loss with respect to the Group’s net investment in the associate.  Goodwill included in the carrying 
amount  of  the  investment  in  associate  is  not  tested  separately,  rather  the  entire  carrying  amount  of  the 
investment  is  tested  for  impairment  as  a  single  asset.    If  an  impairment  is  recognised,  the  amount  is  not 
allocated to the goodwill of the associate. 

The consolidated statement of comprehensive income reflects the Group's share of the results of operations of 
the  associate,  and  its  share  of  post-acquisition  movements  in  reserves  is  recognised  in  reserves.    The 
cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment.  Dividends 
receivable from associates are recognised in comprehensive income as a component of other income. 
When the Group’s share of losses in an associate equals or exceeds its interest in the associate, including any 
unsecured long-term receivable and loans, the Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred 
obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate. 
The balance dates of the associate and the Group are identical and the associate's accounting policies conform 
to those used by the Group for like transactions and events in similar circumstances. 

(e) 

Plant and Equipment 

Plant and equipment is measured on the cost basis less depreciation and impairment losses. 

The carrying amount of plant & equipment is reviewed annually by directors to ensure it is not in excess of the 
recoverable amount from those assets. Recoverable amount is assessed on the basis of the expected net cash 
flows  which  will  be  received  from  the  asset’s  employment  and  subsequent  disposal.  The  expected  net  cash 
flows have been discounted to their present values in determining recoverable amounts. 

Depreciation is calculated on the straight line basis and is brought to account over the estimated useful lives of 
all plant and equipment from the time the asset is held ready for use. The depreciation rates used are: 

Office furniture 
Office computer equipment 
Motor vehicles 

15-33% 
33% 
20% 

The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance date. 

An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the assets carrying amount 
is greater than its estimated recoverable amount. Gains and losses on disposal are determined by comparing 
proceeds  with  the  carrying  amount.  These  gains  and  losses  are  included  in  the  statement  of  comprehensive 
income. When revalued assets are sold, amounts included in the revaluation reserve relating to the assets are 
then transferred to accumulated losses. 

14

Page 30 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 31

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

1. 

(f) 

Statement of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) 

Income Tax 

The  income  tax  expense  or  benefit  for  the  period  is  the  tax  payable  on  the  current  period’s  taxable  income 
based on the applicable income tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and 
liabilities attributable to temporary difference and to unused tax losses.   

The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at 
the end of the reporting period in the countries where the company’s subsidiaries and associates operate and 
generate  taxable  income.    Management  periodically  evaluates  positions  taken  in  tax  returns  with  respect  to 
situations  in  which  applicable  tax  regulation  is  subject  to  interpretation.    It  establishes  provisions  where 
appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities.  

Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be 
recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are 
those that are enacted or substantively enacted by the balance date. 

Deferred  income  tax  is  provided  on  all  temporary  differences  at  the  balance  date  between  the  tax  bases  of 
assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. 
Deferred income tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences except: 
  when the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or of an asset or liability 

in a transaction that is not a business combination and that, at the time of the transaction, affects neither 
the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; or 

  when the taxable temporary difference is associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates or 

interests in joint ventures, and the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference can be controlled and 
it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. 

Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax 
assets and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which 
the deductible temporary differences and the carry-forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be 
utilised, except: 
  when the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial 
recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination  and, at the time of 
the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; or 

  when the deductible temporary difference is associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates or 

interests in joint ventures, in which case a deferred tax asset is only recognised to the extent that it is 
probable that the temporary difference will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be 
available against which the temporary difference can be utilised. 

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance date and reduced to the extent 
that  it  is  no  longer  probable  that  sufficient  taxable  profit  will  be  available  to  allow  all  or  part  of  the  deferred 
income tax asset to be utilised. 

Unrecognised  deferred  income  tax  assets  are  reassessed  at  each  balance  date  and  are  recognised  to  the 
extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered. 
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year 
when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or 
substantively enacted at the balance date. 

Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in profit or loss. 

Deferred  tax  assets  and  deferred  tax  liabilities  are  offset  only  if  a  legally  enforceable  right  exists  to  set  off 
current  tax  assets  against  current  tax  liabilities  and  the  deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  relate  to  the  same 
taxable entity and the same taxation authority. 

(g) 

Cash & Cash Equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid 
investments  with  original  maturities  of  three months  or  less,  and  bank  overdrafts.  Bank  overdrafts are  shown 
within short-term borrowings in current liabilities on the Statement of Financial Position. 

(h) 

Acquisition of Assets 

The purchase method of accounting is used for all acquisitions of assets regardless of whether shares or other 
assets are acquired. Cost is determined as the fair value of the assets given up at the date of the acquisition  

15

Page 32 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

1. 

Statement of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) 

plus  costs  incidental  to  the  acquisition.  Transaction  costs  arising  on  the  issue  of  equity  instruments  are 
recognised directly in equity. 

(i) 

Impairment of assets 

At each reporting date, the Group reviews the carrying values of its tangible and intangible assets to determine 
whether  there  is  any  indication  that  those  assets  have  been  impaired.  If  such  an  indication  exists,  the 
recoverable amount of the asset, being the higher of the asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use, is 
compared to the asset’s carrying value. Any excess of the asset’s carrying value over its recoverable amount is 
expensed to the statement of comprehensive income. 

Impairment testing is performed annually for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives. 

Where  it  is  not  possible  to  estimate  the  recoverable  amount  of  an  individual  asset,  the  Group  estimates  the 
recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. 

(j) 

Financial Instruments 

Recognition 
Financial instruments are initially measured at cost on trade date,  which includes transaction costs, when the 
related contractual rights or obligations exist. Subsequent to initial recognition these instruments are measured 
as set out below. 

Loans and receivables 
Loans  and  receivables  are  non-derivative  financial  assets  with  fixed  or  determinable  payments  that  are  not 
quoted in an active market and are stated at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. 

Available-for-sale financial assets 
Available for sale financial assets include any financial assets not included in the above categories. Available-
for-sale  financial  assets  are  reflected  at  fair  value.  Unrealised  gains  and  losses  arising  from  changes  in  fair 
value are taken directly to equity.  

Financial liabilities 
Non-derivative  financial  liabilities  are  recognised  at  amortised  cost,  comprising  original  debt  less  principal 
payments and amortisation. 

Fair value 
Fair  value  is  determined  based  on  current  bid  prices  for  all  quoted  investments.  Valuation  techniques  are 
applied  to  determine  the  fair  value  for  all  unlisted  securities,  including  recent  arm’s  length  transactions, 
reference to similar instruments and option pricing models. 

Impairment 
At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial instrument 
has been impaired. In the case of available-for sale financial instruments, a prolonged decline in the value of 
the instrument is considered to determine whether an impairment has arisen. Impairment losses are recognised 
in the statement of comprehensive income. 

(k) 

Exploration and Development Expenditure 

Exploration, evaluation and acquisition costs are written off in the year they are incurred.   Development costs 
are  capitalised.   Amortisation  is  not  charged  on  costs  carried  forward  in  respect  of  areas  of  interest  in  the 
development phase until production. 

(l) 

Employee Entitlements 

Salaries, wages and annual leave 

Liabilities for  wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits, annual leave and accumulating sick leave 
expected to be settled within twelve months of the reporting date are recognised in other creditors in respect to 
employees’ services up to the reporting date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the 
liabilities  are  settled.  Liabilities  for  non-accumulating  sick  leave  are  recognised  when  the  leave  is  taken  and 
measured at the rates paid or payable. 

16

Page 32 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 33

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

1. 

Statement of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) 

Equity settled transactions 

The  Group  provides  benefits  to  employees  (including  senior  executives)  of  the  Group  in  the  form  of  share-
based  payments,  whereby  employees  render  services  in  exchange  for  shares  or  rights  over  shares  (equity-
settled transactions). 

There are currently two plans in place to provide these benefits: 
 
 

the Employee Share Option Plan (ESOP), which provides benefits to directors and senior executives; and 
the Employee Share Loan Plan (ESLP), which provides benefits to all employees, excluding senior 
executives and directors. 

 
The cost of these equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value of the 
equity  instruments  at  the  date  at  which  they  are  granted.  The  fair  value  is  determined  by  an  external  valuer 
using  a  Black  Scholes  model,  further  details  of  which  are  given  in  Note  18.  In  valuing  equity-settled 
transactions, no account is taken of any performance conditions, other than conditions linked to the price of the 
shares of Empire Resources Limited (market conditions) if applicable. 

The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the 
period in which the performance and/or service conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant 
employees become fully entitled to the award (the vesting period). 

The  cumulative  expense  recognised  for  equity-settled  transactions  at  each  balance  date  until  vesting  date 
reflects (i) the extent to which the vesting period has expired and (ii) the Group’s best estimate of the number of 
equity  instruments  that  will  ultimately  vest.  No  adjustment  is  made  for  the  likelihood  of  market  performance 
conditions being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the determination of fair value at grant date. 
The profit or loss charge or credit for a period represents the movement in cumulative expense recognised as 
at the beginning and end of that period. 

No  expense  is  recognised  for  awards  that  do  not  ultimately  vest,  except  for  awards  where  vesting  is  only 
conditional upon a market condition. 

If the terms of  an  equity-settled  award are  modified, as a  minimum an expense is recognised  as  if the terms 
had not been modified. In addition, an expense is recognised for any modification that increases the total fair 
value of the share-based payment arrangement, or is otherwise beneficial to the employee, as measured at the 
date of modification. 

If  an  equity-settled  award  is  cancelled,  it  is  treated  as  if  it  had  vested  on  the  date  of  cancellation,  and  any 
expense not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted for 
the cancelled award and designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and 
new  award  are  treated  as  if  they  were  a  modification  of  the  original  award,  as  described  in  the  previous 
paragraph. 

The dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the computation of 
earnings per share (see Note 5). 

The Group expenses equity-settled share-based payments such  as share and option issues after ascribing a 
fair  value  to  the  shares  and/or  options  issued.  The  fair  value  of  option  and  share  plan  issues  of  option  and 
share  plan  shares  are  recognised  as  an  expense  together  with  a  corresponding  increase  in  the  share  based 
payments reserve or the share option reserve in equity over the vesting period. The proceeds received net of 
any directly attributable transaction costs are credited to share capital when options are exercised. 

The value of shares issued to employees financed by way of a non recourse loan under the employee Share 
Plan is recognised  with a corresponding increase in equity  when the company receives funds from either the 
employees repaying the loan or upon the loan termination, pursuant to the rules of the share plan. All shares 
issued under the plan with non recourse loans are considered, for accounting purposes, to be options. 

(m) 

Trade Receivables 

All trade receivables are recognised at the amounts receivable as they are due for settlement no more than 30 
days from the date of recognition. 

Collectability of trade receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Debts which are known to be uncollectible 
are written off. An allowance for doubtful debts is raised where some doubt as to collection exists. 

17

Page 34 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

1. 

Statement of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) 

(n) 

Trade creditors 

These  amounts  represent  liabilities  for  goods  and  services  provided  to  the  Company  prior  to  the  end  of  the 
financial  period  and  which  are  unpaid.  The  amounts  are  unsecured  and  are  usually  paid  within  30  days  of 
recognition. 

(o) 

Recoverable Amount of Non-current Assets 

The recoverable amount of an asset is the net amount expected to be recovered through the cash inflows and 
outflows arising from its continued use and subsequent disposal. 

Where the carrying amount of a non-current asset is greater than its recoverable amount, the asset is written 
down to its recoverable amount. Where net cash inflows are derived from a group of assets working together, 
recoverable amount is determined on the basis of the relevant group of assets. The decrement in the carrying 
amount  is  recognised  as  an  expense  in  net  profit  or  loss  in  the  reporting  period  in  which  the  recoverable 
amount  write-down  occurs.    The  expected  net  cash  flows  used  in  determining  recoverable  amount  are  not 
discounted to their present value. 

(p) 

Leases 

A  distinction  is  made  between  finance  leases,  which  effectively  transfer  from  the  lessor  to  the  lessee 
substantially  all  the  risks  and  benefits  incidental  to  ownership  of  leased  non-current  assets,  and  operating 
leases under which the lessor effectively retains substantially all such risks and benefits 

Operating  lease  payments  are  charged  as  expenses  in  the  periods  in  which  they  are  incurred,  as  this 
represents the pattern of benefits derived from the leased assets. 

(q) 

Revenue Recognition 

Amounts disclosed as revenue are net of duties and taxes paid. Revenue is recognised as follows: 

(i) 

Interest 

Interest  earned  is  recognised  as  and  when  it  is  receivable,  including  interest  which  is  accrued  and  is  readily 
convertible to cash within two working days. Accrued interest is recorded as part of other debtors. 

(ii) 

Sundry income 

Sundry income is recognised as and when it is receivable. Income receivable, but not received at balance 
date, is recorded as part of other debtors. 

(r) 

Goods and Services Tax (GST) 

Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST, except where the amount of GST 
incurred  is  not  recoverable  from  the  Australian  Tax  Office.  In  these  circumstances  the  GST  is  recognised  as 
part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of an item of the expense. Receivables and payables in the 
Statement of Financial Position are shown inclusive of GST. 

(s) 

Critical accounting estimates and judgements 

The  directors  evaluate  estimates  and  judgments  incorporated  into  the  financial  report  based  on  historical 
knowledge and best available current information. Estimates assume a reasonable expectation of future events 
and are based on current trends and economic data, obtained both externally and within the group. 

Key Estimates — Impairment 

The group assesses impairment at each reporting date by evaluating conditions specific to the group that may 
lead  to  impairment  of  assets.  Where  an  impairment  trigger  exists,  the  recoverable  amount  of  the  asset  is 
determined.  Value-in-use  calculations  performed  in  assessing  recoverable  amounts  incorporate  a  number  of 
key estimates. 

Share-based payment transactions 

The Group measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the 
equity  instruments  at  the  date  at  which  they  are  granted.  The  fair  value  is  determined  by  an  external  valuer 
using a Black Scholes model, using the assumptions detailed in Note 18. 

18

Page 34 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 35

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

1. 

Statement of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) 

The Group measures the cost of cash-settled share-based payments at fair value at the grant date using the 
Black  and  Scholes  formula  taking  into  account  the  terms  and  conditions  upon  which  the  instruments  were 
granted, as discussed in Note 18. 

This fair value is expensed over the period until vesting with recognition of a corresponding liability. The liability 
is re-measured to fair value at each balance date up to and including the settlement date with changes in fair 
value recognised in profit or loss. 

(t) 

 Adoption of new and revised standards  

Changes in accounting policies on initial application of Accounting Standards 

In  the  year  ended  30  June  2011,  the  Group  has  reviewed  all  of  the  new  and  revised  Standards  and 
Interpretations  issued  by  the  AASB  that  are  relevant  to  its  operations  and  effective  for  the  current  annual 
reporting period.   

It  has  been  determined  by  the  Group  that  there  is  no  impact,  material  or  otherwise,  of  the  new  and  revised 
Standards  and  Interpretations  on  its  business  and,  therefore,  no  change  is  necessary  to  Group  accounting 
policies. 

The  Group  has  also  reviewed  all  new  Standards  and  Interpretations  that  have  been  issued  but  are  not  yet 
effective for the year ended 30 June 2011. As a result of this review the Directors have determined that there is 
no  impact,  material  or  otherwise,  of  the  new  and  revised  Standards  and  Interpretations  on  its  business  and, 
therefore, no change necessary to Group accounting policies. 

(u) 

Segment Reporting 

Operating segments are now reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief 
operating decision maker.  The chief operating decision maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and 
assessing performance of the operating segments,  has been identified as the Board of Empire Resources Ltd. 

The  Group  operates  only  in  one  business  and  geographical  segment  being  predominantly  in  the  area  of 
mineral exploration in Western Australia.  The Group considers its business operations in mineral exploration 
to be its primary reporting function. 

(v) 

 Earnings per share 

Basic earnings per share is calculated as net profit or loss attributable to members of the parent, adjusted to 
exclude  any  costs  of  servicing  equity  (other  than  dividends)  and  preference  share  dividends,  divided  by  the 
weighted average number of ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element. 

Diluted earnings per share is calculated as net profit or loss attributable to members of the parent, adjusted for: 
 
 

costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends; 
the after tax effect of dividends and interest associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares that have 
been recognised as expenses; and 
other non-discretionary changes in revenues or expenses during the period that would result from the 
dilution of potential ordinary shares; divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares and 
dilutive potential ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element. 

 

(w) 

Parent Entity Financial Information 

The financial information for the parent entity, Empire resources Limited disclosed in Note 22 has been 
prepared on the same basis as the Group. 

19

Page 36 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

2. 

Revenue 

Revenue
Interest received
Sale of tenement
Other income

3. 

Loss from ordinary activities 

Loss before income tax

The loss from ordinary activities before income tax 
has been determined after:

(a) Expenses

Depreciation

Consolidated

2011
$

2010
$

68,766
454,545 
-

24,357 
1,499,804 
10,000 

523,311 

1,534,161 

Consolidated

2011
$

2010
$

20,691

23,577 

Exploration costs written off

1,575,018 

1,147,416 

Page 36 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 37

20

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

4. 

(a) 

Income tax 

Income tax recognised in loss 

No income tax is payable by the parent or consolidated group as they both recorded losses for income tax 
purposes for the year. 

(b) 

Numerical reconciliation between income tax expense and the loss before income tax. 

Loss before tax

Income tax benefit at 30% (2010:30%)
Tax effect of:
- deductible capital raising expenditure
- non deductible expenditure
- deductible temporary differences
- share based payment
- gain on sale of tenement
Deferred tax asset not recognised
Previously unrecognised tax losses now recouped 
to reduce current tax expense
R&D tax offset payment from prior year
Income tax benefit attributable to loss from 
ordinary activities before tax

(c) Unrecognised deferred tax balances

Consolidated

2011
$

2010
$

(2,111,882)

(522,353)

633,565 

156,706 

45,204 
(76,686)
3,981 
(32,481)
-
(573,583)

-
204,022 

204,022 

35,484 
(236,294)
(2,291)
(34,173)
(242,868)
- 

323,436 
- 

- 

Tax losses attributable to members of the group -
revenue

8,975,065 

7,063,124 

Potential tax benefit at 30%
Deferred tax asset asset not booked
Amounts recognised in statement of 
comprehensive income
-employee provisions
-other
-R&D tax offset
Amounts recognised in equity
- share issue costs

2,692,520 

2,118,937 

2,160 
6,150 
-

4,061 
7,725 
204,022 

48,676 

50,013 

Net unrecognised deferred tax asset at 30%

2,749,506 

2,384,758 

A  deferred  tax  asset  attributable  to  income  tax  losses  has  not  been  recognised  at  balance  date  as  the 
probability criteria disclosed in Note 1(f) is not satisfied and such benefit will only be available if the conditions 
of deductibility also disclosed in Note 1(f) are satisfied.  

21

Page 38 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

5. 

Loss per share 

Basic and diluted loss per share (cents per share)

Consolidated

2011
Cents

2010
Cents

(1.65)

(0.61)

Loss used in the calculation of basic EPS

(1,907,860)

(522,353)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding 
during the year used in calculations of basic loss 
per share

115,668,524 

85,856,572 

Diluted loss per share has not been disclosed as it 
is not materially different from basic loss per share

6. 

Cash and cash equivalents 

Consolidated Group
2011
2010
$
$

Cash at bank and in hand

1,781,147 

595,674 

1,781,147 

595,674 

 (i)  Reconciliation of cash flow from operations with loss after income tax 

Loss after income tax
Sale of tenement
Depreciation 
Share based payments expense
Exploration expenditure written off
Income tax benefit
Share of loss of equity accounted investees

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effects 
of purchase of subsidiaries:
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables

(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables

(Decrease)/increase in employee benefits

Consolidated Group
2011
2010
$
$

(1,907,860)
(454,545)
20,691
108,270 
1,453,408 
(204,022)
253,754 
(730,304)

(522,353)
(1,499,804)
23,577 
113,909 
1,167,660 
- 
243,159 
(473,852)

(69,406)

(53,904)

166,984 
(9,213)

24,422 
1,041 

Net cash outflow from operating activities 

(641,939)

(502,293)

22

Page 38 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 39

 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

7. 

Trade and other Receivables 

Current

Trade receivables
Other receivables

Consolidated Group
2011
2010
$
$

26,360
284,495 

310,855 

36,090 
34,771 

70,861 

Provision for Impairment of Receivables 

Current trade receivables are non-interest bearing and generally on 30 day terms.  A provision for impairment 
is recognised when there is objective evidence that an individual trade receivable is impaired.   

8. 

Investments  

(a) Investments accounted for using the Equity Method  

Consolidated Group
2010
$

2011
$

Reconciliation of movements in investments 
accounted for using the equity method:

Balance at 1 July
Acquisitions
Share of loss since acquistion
Movement in investment's reserves
Balance at 30 June 

1,256,645 
-
(253,754)
(139,664)
863,227 

- 
1,499,804 
(243,159)
- 
1,256,645 

Name of entity

Principal activity

Associated entity

Ownership interest

Published fair value

2011

2010

2011

2010

Country of 
incorporation

%

%

$

$

FYI Resources Ltd

Mineral exploration

Australia

28%

32%

985,617  1,353,559 

23

Page 40 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

8. 

Investments (continued) 

Summarised financial information of associates:

Financial position
Total assets
Total liabilities
Net assets
Group’s share of associates’ net assets
Financial performance
Total revenue
Total loss for the year
Group’s share of associate’s profit/(loss)

Group’s share of associate’s compehensive loss
Capital commitments and contingent liabilities of
associate:
Share of capital commitments incurred jointly with
other investors
Share of contingent liabilities incurred jointly with
other investors

Consolidated Group

2011

$

2010

$

3,689,651 
169,589 
3,520,062 
985,617 

50,709 
(867,439)
(253,754)

(139,664)

4,678,120 
450,124 
4,227,996 
1,353,559 

29,645 
(1,223,518)
(243,159)

- 

370,570 

406,534 

-

- 

(b) Investments in subsidiary 

Controlled entity

Parent Entity:
Empire Resources Limited
Subsidiary of Empire Resources Limited:

Torrens Resources Pty Ltd

Percentage
Owned
2011

Percentage 
Owned
2010

%

%

- 

100

- 

100 

Country of 
incorporation

Australia

Australia

Page 40 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 41

24

 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

9. 

Plant & equipment 

Plant and Equipment
  Cost
 Accumulated depreciation

Motor Vehicles
  Cost
 Accumulated depreciation

Consolidated Group
2011
2010
$
$

37,153
(27,618)
9,535

90,217
(76,061)
14,156

27,198 
(25,069)
2,129 

90,217 
(57,919)
32,298 

Total Plant and Equipment

23,691

34,427 

Movements in the carrying amounts of each class of property, plant & equipment at 
the beginning and end of the current financial period is as set out below:

Plant and Equipment

Balance at the beginning of year
Additions
Depreciation expense
Carrying amount at the end of the year

Motor Vehicles

Balance at the beginning of year
Additions
Depreciation expense
Carrying amount at the end of the year

10.  Trade and other payables 

Trade payables and accruals
Employee benefits

Consolidated Group
2011
2010
$
$

2,129
9,955
(2,549)
9,535

32,298
-
(18,142)
14,156

7,563 
- 
(5,434)
2,129 

50,441 
- 
(18,143)
32,298 

Consolidated Group
2011
2010
$
$

283,827
14,024
297,851

106,869 
23,237 
130,106 

25

Page 42 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

11. 

Issued capital 

(a) Ordinary shares  

Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the Company 
in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares. 

On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting, in person or by proxy, is entitled to 
one vote, and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote. 

127,295,921 (2010: 97,195,921) fully paid ordinary 
shares

(i) Ordinary shares - number

At 1 July 2010
Shares issued - 10,750,000 on 14 August 2009 at
$0.05 Sophisticated investors
Shares issued - 1,850,000 on 24 November 2009
at $0.05 Sophisticated investors
Shares placement - 4,450,000 on 23 December
2009 at $0.075
Shares placement - 8,227,729 on 12 May 2010 at
$0.07
Share placement - 9,400,000 on 13 October 2010
at $0.062
Share placement
2010 at $0.062
Share placement
2010 at $0.12

- 5,000,000 on 26 November

- 15,700,000 on 7 December

Consolidated Group
2011
2010
$
$

14,516,700

11,723,878

Consolidated Group
2011
2010
No.
No.

97,195,921 

71,918,192 

-

-

-

-

10,750,000 

1,850,000 

4,450,000 

8,227,729 

9,400,000 

5,000,000 

15,700,000 

- 

- 

- 

Balance at 30 June 2011

127,295,921 

97,195,921 

Page 42 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 43

26

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

11. Issued capital (continued) 

(ii)  Ordinary shares – value

At 1 July 2010
Shares issued - 10,750,000 on 14 August 2009 at
$0.05 Sophisticated investors
Shares issued - 1,850,000 on 24 November 2009
at $0.05 Sophisticated investors
Shares placement - 4,450,000 on 23 December
2009 at $0.075
Shares placement - 8,227,729 on 12 May 2010 at
$0.07
Share placement - 9,400,000 on 13 October 2010
at $0.062
Share placement
2010 at $0.062
Share placement
2010 at $0.12
Shares issued ERL share Plan - 2,450,000 on 8
May 2011 at $0.0821
Less share issue costs
Balance at 30 June 2011

- 15,700,000 on 7 December

- 5,000,000 on 26 November

Consolidated Group
2011
2010
$
$

11,723,878 

10,269,731 

-

-

-

-

582,800 

310,000 

1,884,000 

200,900 
(184,878)
14,516,700 

537,500 

92,500 

333,750 

575,941 

- 

- 

- 

- 
(85,544)
11,723,878 

Note 1  - In May 2008, 2,450,000 shares were issued under the Company's share plan and the loans were 
repaid pursuant to the share plan in May 2011. 

(b) Options  

As at 30 June 2011 (30 June 2010: 13,927,729) the Company had the following options on issue over 
ordinary shares:- 

Grant Date

Date of 
Expiry

Exercise 
Price $

Number
under 
Option

2-Jun-10
25-Jun-10

2-Jun-13
25-Jun-13

0.15 
0.14 

8,227,729 
2,700,000 

10,927,729 

27

Page 44 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

12.  Reserves 

Reserves

847,444 

739,174 

Consolidated Group
2011
2010
$
$

Reserves comprise the following:

Options reserve

Balance as at start of financial year

Share-based payment

739,174

108,270

625,265 

113,909 

Balance as at end of the financial year

847,444

739,174 

Details of certain components of the option reserve arising as a consequence of equity  based payments are 
included in Note 18. 

13.  Financial risk management 

The Group’s financial situation is not complex. It’s activities may expose it to a variety of financial risks in the 
future:  market risk (including  currency  risk and fair value interest rate risk), credit risk,  liquidity  risk and cash 
flow  interest  rate  risk.    At  that  stage  the  Group’s  overall  risk  management  program  will  focus  on  the 
unpredictability  of  the  financial  markets  and  seek  to  minimise  potential  adverse  effects  on  the  financial 
performance of the Group.   

Risk management is carried out under an approved framework covering a risk management policy and internal 
compliance and control by management.  The Board identifies, evaluates and approves measures to address 
financial risks.  

The Group hold the following financial instruments: 

Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables

Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables

Consolidated Group
2011
2010
$
$

1,781,147
310,855

595,674 
70,861 

2,092,002

666,535 

297,851

130,106 

28

Page 44 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 45

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

13.  Financial risk management (continued) 

(a)  Market risk 

Cash flow and fair value interest rate risk 

The Group’s main interest rate risk arises from cash deposits to be applied to exploration and development of 
areas of interest. Deposits at variable rates expose the Group to cash flow interest rate risk. Deposits at fixed 
rates expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk. During 2011 and 2010, the Group’s deposits at variable 
rates were denominated in Australian Dollars. 

As  at  the  reporting  date,  the  Group  had  the  following  variable  rate  deposits  and  there  were  no  interest  rate 
swap contracts outstanding: 

2011
Weighted 
average 
interest rate
%

2010
Weighted 
average 
interest rate
%

Balance
$

1,622,503 
158,644 

Balance
$
537,828 
57,846 

5.1%

1,781,147 

3.0%

595,674 

Deposit
Other cash available
Net exposure to cash flow interest 
rate risk

The Group analyses its interest rate exposure on a dynamic basis. Various scenarios are simulated taking into 
the renewal of existing positions.  

Sensitivity – Consolidated and Parent entity 

During  2011,  if  interest  rates  had  been  1%  higher  or  lower  than  the  prevailing  rates  realised,  with  all  other 
variables held constant, there would be an immaterial change in post-tax profit for the year. Equity would not 
have been impacted. 

 (b)  Credit risk 

The Group has no significant concentrations of credit risk.  Cash transactions are limited to high credit quality 
financial institutions. 

Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments and deposits with banks and 
financial  institutions,  as  well  as  credit  exposures  on  outstanding  receivables  and  committed  transactions.  In 
relation to other credit risk areas management assesses the credit quality of the customer, taking into account 
its financial position, past experience and other factors.  

The  maximum  exposure  to  credit  risk  at  the  reporting  date  is  the  carrying  amount  of  the  financial  assets  as 
summarised at the beginning of this note.  

(c)  Liquidity risk 

Prudent  liquidity  risk  management  implies  maintaining  sufficient  cash,  the  availability  of funding  through  an 
adequate  amount  of  committed  credit  facilities  and  the  ability  to  close-out  market  positions.    The  Group 
manages  liquidity  risk  by  continuously  monitoring  forecast  and  actual  cash  flows  and  matching  the  maturity 
profiles  of financial  assets  and  liabilities.  The  Group  will  aim  at  maintaining  flexibility  in funding  by  accessing 
appropriate  committed  credit  lines  available  from  different  counterparties  where  appropriate  and  possible.  
Surplus  funds  when  available  are  generally  only  invested  in  high  credit  quality  financial  institutions  in  highly 
liquid markets. 

Financing arrangements 

The Consolidated and parent entity has no borrowing facilities. 

29

Page 46 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

 13.  Financial risk management (continued) 

30 June 2011

Financial Assets:

Cash & cash equivalents

Trade and other receivables

Total Financial Assets

Financial Liabilities:

Trade and other payables

Short-term borrowings

Total financial liabilities

30 June 2010

Financial Assets:

Cash & cash equivalents

Trade and other receivables

Total Financial Assets

Financial Liabilities:

Trade and other payables

Short-term borrowings

Total financial liabilities

Fixed Interest Rate Maturing

Weighted 
Average 
Effective 
Interest Rate

Floating 

Interest Rate Within Year

$

$

1 to 5 Years
$

Over 5 Years
$

Non-interest 
bearing
$

Total
$

5.1%

1,761,147 

20,000 

- 

- 

1,761,147 

20,000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1,781,147 

310,855 

310,855 

310,855 

2,092,002 

297,851 

297,851 

- 

- 

297,851 

297,851 

Fixed Interest Rate Maturing

Weighted 
Average 
Effective 
Interest Rate

Floating 

Interest Rate Within Year

1 to 5 Years

Over 5 Years

Non-interest 
bearing

$

$

$

$

$

Total

$

3.0%

575,674 

20,000 

- 

- 

575,674 

20,000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

70,861 

70,861 

595,674 

70,861 

666,535 

130,106 

130,106 

- 

- 

130,106 

130,106 

Maturities of financial assets and liabilities

The  note  above  analyses  the  Consolidated  and  parent  entity's  financial  liabilities.  These  liabilities  comprise 
trade and other payables, are non interest bearing and will mature within 12 months. The amounts disclosed 
are the contractual undiscounted cash flows. There are no derivatives. 

Page 46 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 47

30

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

13.  Financial risk management (continued) 

Maturity analysis of financial assets and liability based on management’s expectation 

Year ended 30 June 2011

<6 months

6-12 months

1-5 years

>5 years

Total

Consolidated
Financial assets
Cash & cash equivalents
Trade & other receivables

Financial liabilities
Trade & other payables

Net maturity

(d)  Fair value estimation 

1,781,147 
310,855 
2,092,002 

297,851 

1,794,151 

- 
- 
- 

- 

- 

- 
- 
- 

- 

- 

-  1,781,147 
- 
310,855 
-  2,092,002 

- 

297,851 

-  1,794,151 

The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities must be estimated for recognition and measurement or 
for disclosure purposes. 

The  fair  value  of  financial  instruments  that  are  not  traded  in  an  active  market  (for  example,  investments  in 
unlisted  subsidiaries)  is  determined  using  valuation  techniques  or  cost  (impaired  if  appropriate).  The  Group 
uses  a variety  of  methods  and  makes  assumptions  that  are  based  on  market  conditions  existing  at  each 
balance date.  

The carrying value less impairment provision of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate 
their fair values due to their short-term nature. 

14.  Capital and Leasing Commitments 

(i) Operating Lease Commitments 

Non-cancellable operating leases contracted for
but not capitalised in the financial statements 

Payable - minimum lease payments 
-  not later than 12 months
-  between 12 months and 5 years
 - greater than 5 years

The company entered into an operating lease on 1
August 2007 for office space it occupies in Victoria
Park. The term of the lease is 3 years and expired
on 1 August 2010. The lease was renewed for a
further 3 years to 31 July 2013.

Consolidated

2011
$

2010
$

53,069
55,881
- 
108,950 

48,493 
102,136 
- 
150,629 

31

Page 48 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

14. Capital and Leasing Commitments (continued) 

(ii) Expenditure commitments contracted for:

Exploration Tenements
tenure to
In order to maintain current rights of
exploration tenements, the Company is required to
outlay
the minimum
expenditure requirements. These obligations are
not provided for in the financial statements and are
payable:

to meet

rentals

and

-  not later than 12 months
-  between 12 months and 5 years
-  greater than 5 years

15. Directors and other key management personnel  

 (i) Details of Key Management Personnel 

Chairman – non-executive 
Mr T Revy (from 8 January 2010) 

Managing Director 
Mr D Sargeant (from 13 April 2000) 

Executive director 
Mr A Jessup (from 15 August 2003) 

Company Secretary 
Mr S Storm (from 30 April 2007) 

(ii) Compensation of Key Management Personnel 

Short-term employee benefits
Post-employment benefits
Share-based payments

Consolidated

2011

$

2010

$

344,299 
1,377,196 
- 
1,721,495 

752,054 
3,008,216 
- 
3,760,270 

Consolidated

2011
$

387,800 
-
71,891 
459,691 

2010
$

336,800 
- 
97,614 
434,414 

The  company  has  taken  advantage  of  the  relief  provided  by  AASB  2008-4  Amendments  to  Australian 
Accounting  Standard  –  Key  Management  Personnel  Disclosures  by  Disclosing  Entities,  and  has  transferred 
the  detailed  remuneration  disclosures  to  the  directors’  report.  The  relevant  information  can  be  found  in  the 
Remuneration Report on pages 20 to 23. 
Remuneration Report on pages 3 to 6. 

(iii) Equity instrument disclosures relating to directors and other key management personnel 

Shareholdings 
The  number  of  ordinary  shares  in  the  Company  held  during  the  year  by  each  director  and  other  key 
management personnel, including their personally related entities or associates, are set out below.   

32

Page 48 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 49

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

15. Directors and other key management personnel (continued) 

2011 Shareholdings of Key Management Personnel

Directors

Mr T Revy 
Mr D Sargeant
Mr A Jessup

Specified Executives

Mr S Storm

Balance at the 
start of the 
period

Issued under 
share plan

On exercise of 
options

Net change other

Balance at the 
end of the 
period

350,000 
6,100,000 
2,067,555 
8,517,555 

350,000 
350,000 

- 
- 
- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 
- 
- 

- 
- 

360,000 
- 
- 
360,000 

710,000 
6,100,000 
2,067,555 
8,877,555 

- 
- 

350,000 
350,000 

2010 Shareholdings of Key Management Personnel

Directors

Balance at the 
start of the 
period

Issued under 
share plan

On exercise of 
options

Net change other

Balance at the 
end of the 
period

Mr A Griffin 1
Mr T Revy 2
Mr D Sargeant

Mr A Jessup

Specified Executives

Mr S Storm

1 Resigned 8 January 2010
2 Appointed 8 January 2010

500,000 

- 

6,100,000 

2,067,555 

8,667,555 

350,000 

350,000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

350,000 

- 

- 

350,000 

500,000 

350,000 

6,100,000 

2,067,555 

9,017,555 

- 

- 

350,000 

350,000 

All equity transactions with key management personnel, which relate to the Company’s listed ordinary shares, 
have been entered into on an arms length basis. 

33

Page 50 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

15. Directors and other key management personnel (continued) 

Option holdings 

Details of shares issued as remuneration can be found in the remuneration report. 

The number of options over ordinary shares in the Company held during the reporting period by each director 
and key management personnel, including their personally related entities, are set out below. 

2011 Option holdings of Key Management Personnel

Directors

Mr T Revy
Mr D Sargeant
Mr A Jessup

Specified Executives

Mr S Storm

Balance at 
the start of 
the period

500,000 
500,000 
500,000 
1,500,000 

500,000 
500,000 

Issued

Expired

Net change other

Balance at 
the end of the 
period

Vested and 
exercisable at 30 
June 2011

- 
- 
- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 
- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 
- 
- 

- 
- 

500,000 
500,000 
500,000 
1,500,000 

500,000 
500,000 

- 
- 
- 
- 

- 
-   

2010 Option holdings of Key Management Personnel

Directors

Balance at 
the start of 
the period

Issued

Expired Net change other

Balance at 
the end of 
the period

Vested and 
exercisable at 30 
June 2010

Mr A Griffin 1
Mr T Revy 2

Mr D Sargeant

Mr A Jessup

Specified Executives

Mr S Storm

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

500,000 

500,000 

500,000 

-  1,500,000 

- 

- 

500,000 

500,000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

500,000 

500,000 

500,000 

1,500,000 

500,000 

500,000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Page 50 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 51

34

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

16.  Related Parties 

Directors and specified executives 

Disclosures relating to the remuneration and shareholdings of directors and specified executives are set out in 
the Directors’ Report and Note 15 respectively. 

Other transactions with directors, their associates and director related entities are as follows: 

Amounts paid to companies associated with certain 
Directors for management services
Kirkdale Holdings Pty Ltd - Mr D Sargeant

Murilla Exploration Pty Ltd - Mr A Jessup

Mr T Revy

Total

Amounts payable to Directors for Directors Fees

Mr T Revy
Mr A Griffin

Consolidated

2011
$

2010
$

180,000 

140,000 

22,500 
342,500 

7,500 
-
7,500 

164,000 

108,000 

- 
272,000 

15,000 
15,000 
30,000 

The following table provides the total amount of transactions that were entered into with related parties for the 
relevant financial year:

Related party

Consolidated
Associate:
FYI Resources Ltd

Reimbursement 
of Expenditure 
Related Parties
$

Amounts owed 
by Related 
Parties as at 30 
June
$

Amounts 
Owed to 
Related
parties as at 
30 June
$

Revenue from 
Related Parties
$

2011
2010

- 
1,509,804 

103,604 
172,538 

26,360 
36,090 

- 
-

Associate
The Group has a 28% interest in FYI Resources Limited (2010: 32%).

35

Page 52 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

17.  Remuneration of auditors 

The auditor of Empire Resources Ltd is HLB Mann Judd.   

Consolidated

2011
$

2010
$

Amounts received or due and receivable by HLB
Mann Judd for:

Audit or review of the financial reports of the 
Company

19,025

18,500 

Amounts received or due and receivable by HLB
Mann Judd audit firms:
Other services

18.  Share Based Payments 

-

- 

19,025

18,500 

(a) Employee share plan 
The  Company  has  established  an  employee  share  plan,  which  is  also  available  to  Directors,  known  as  the 
2008 Empire  Resources  Limited Employee Share Plan  and  was approved by  shareholders on 28  November 
2007. 

The issue price for Shares offered under the Plan is at the discretion of the Board, provided that the issue price 
is not less than 1% below the weighted average sale price of Shares sold through ASX during the one week 
period up to and including the offer date. 

A Director or Employee who is invited to subscribe for Shares under the Plan may also be invited to apply for a 
loan up to the amount payable in respect of the Shares accepted, on the following terms:  

a) Loans must be made solely to the Participant or their nominee and in the name of either the Participant or 
their nominee as the case may be. 

b) The principal amount outstanding under a Loan will be interest free. 

c) Any loan made available to a Participant shall be applied by the Company directly toward payment of the 
issue price of the Shares to be acquired under the Plan. 

d) the term of the loan shall be three (3) years from the date of issue of the Shares 

e) The Company retains a lien over each share acquired pursuant to the loan until such time as the loan is 
repaid.  

Set out below is a summary of shares issued to Directors and employees under the Empire Resources 
Employee Share Plan:  

Consolidated entity – 30 June 
2011

Balance at 
start of period

Issued during 
year

Loan repaid 
during year

Expercised 
during year

Balance at 
end of year

Exercisable at 
end of year

Issue date

Expiry date

Number

Number

Number

Number

Number

Number

12 May 2008

12 May 2011

2,450,000 

- 

- 

2,450,000 

- 

- 

Weighted average exercise price

$0.188

$0.082

36

Page 52 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 53

 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

18. 

Share Based Payments (continued) 

(b) Option plan 

The Company has established an option share plan, which is also available to directors, employees and some 
consultants,  known  as  the  2010  Empire  Resources  Option  Plan  and  was  approved  by  shareholders  on  25 
June 2010. 

The  following  table illustrates the  number and  weighted average  exercise prices of  and movements in  share 
options issued during the year: 

2011

2011

2010

2010

Weighted 
average 
exercise 
price

$0.14
- 
- 
- 
- 
$0.14

Number

2,700,000 
- 
- 
- 
- 
2,700,000 

Weighted 
average 
exercise
price

- 
$0.14
- 
- 
- 
$0.14

Number

- 
2,700,000 
- 
- 
- 
2,700,000 

Outstanding at the beginning of the year
Granted during the year
Forfeited during the year
Exercised during the year
Expired during the year
Outstanding at the end of the year

Exercisable at the end of the year

- 

- 

A corporate goal must be met before the options may be exercised: The corporate goal that has been set is 
the  Company’s  market  capitalisation  reaching  $10.77  million  (which  was  the  market  capitalisation  of  the 
Company at 1 December 2009 plus 50%) and remaining at that level for 50 contiuously traded ASX Business 
Days. 

The  fair  value  of  the  equity-settled  share  options  is  estimated  as  at  the  date  of  grant  using  the  Black  and 
Scholes model taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted. 

The following table lists the inputs to the model used for the year ended 30 June 2011: 

Grant Date

Expiry 
date

Exercise 
price

Vesting 
Period

Fair value 
at grant 
date of 
options

Expected 
Volatility Option life

Dividend 
yield

Risk-free 
interest 
rate

Grant 
date 
share 
price

Key 
Management 
Personnel 
options
Employee 
options
Consultant 
options

25-Jun-10 25-Jun-13

$0.14

25-Jun-13

$0.02

107%

3 years

25-Jun-10 25-Jun-13

$0.14

25-Jun-13

$0.02

107%

3 years

25-Jun-10 25-Jun-13

$0.14

25-Jun-13

$0.02

107%

3 years

0%

0%

0%

4.57% $0.04

4.57% $0.04

4.57% $0.04

37

Page 54 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

18. 

Share Based Payments (continued) 

(c) Expenses arising from share-based payment transactions 

Total expenses arising from share-based payment transactions recognised during the period as part of 
employee benefit expense were as follows: 

Shares issued under employee share plan
Options issued

19.  Segment Information 

Consolidated

2011
$
$

2010
$
$

94,770
13,500
108,270

113,724 
185 
113,909 

The Group has applied AASB 8 Operating Segments from 1 July 2009.  AASB 8 requires a “management 
approach”  under  which  segment  information  is  presented  on  the  same  basis  as  that  used  for  internal 
reporting purposes. 
Operating segments are now reported in a manner that is consistent with the internal reporting provided to 
the chief operating decision maker.  The chief operating decision maker has been identified as the Board of 
Empire Resources Ltd. 
Consistent  with  prior  year,  the  Group  operates  only  in  one  business  and  geographical  segment  being 
predominantly  in  the  area  of  mining  and  exploration  in  Australia.    The  Group  considers  its  business 
operations in mineral exploration to be its primary reporting function. 

20.  Contingent assets 

Penny's Find 
In September 2010, the Company entered into a staged sale agreement for the Penny’s Find gold project with 
Brimstone  Resources  Limited  (Brimstone).  At  the  election  of  Brimstone,  the  sale  consideration  comprises 
either: 

• Staged cash payments totalling $2.0 million for a 100% interest of the Penny’s Find project. A royalty will also 
be payable on gold produced in excess of the current JORC resource of 52,500 ozs gold. 

• Staged cash payments totalling $0.5 million together with exploration and development expenditure of up to 
$3  million  for  an 80% interest in  the Penny’s Find project. Any  additional development costs associated  with 
the Company's residual 20% interest will carried by Brimstone and repayable from the proceeds of future gold 
production. 

An  initial  $500,000  (GST  inclusive)  payment  has  been  made  by  Brimstone  during  the  year  to  earn  a  40% 
interest in the project. Brimstone must then continue funding exploration and development work by expending 
up to $3 million by 31st December 2013 to earn an 80% interest in the project. After expending $1.5 million by 
December 2012, Brimstone can elect to purchase 100% of the project for $1.5 million plus a  

2%  gross  royalty  on  gold  produced  in  excess  of  the  current  JORC  resource  of  52,500  ozs  gold.  The  royalty 
would  only  apply  when  the  gold  price  is  above  A$700/oz  and  would  not  exceed  A$50  per  ounce  of  gold 
recovered. 

Troy Creek 
During the March 2011 quarter, the Company  finalised an agreement with unlisted Sydney based company, 
Zodiac Resources Ltd, whereby Zodiac may earn a 55% interest by spending $3 million on  exploration within 
three  years  and  earn  a  75%  interest  by  spending  an  additional  $4  million  on  exploration  and  development 
within 5 years. Zodiac will have the option to acquire a 100% interest in the Troy Creek project within five years 
of commencement of the joint venture for a purchase  price of $5 million – this amount being separate to the 
joint venture commitments.  

21.  Events after the Balance Date  

Since 30 June 2011 there has not been any matter or circumstance not otherwise dealt with in the financial 
report that has significantly affected or may significantly affect the Company. 

38

Page 54 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 55

 
 
 
 
 
 
Empire Resources Limited  

Notes to the Financial Statements 30 June 2011 

22.  Parent Entity Financial Information 

The individual financial statements for the parent entity show the following aggregate amounts: 

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents

Trade and other receivables

Total Current Assets

NON-CURRENT ASSETS

Trade and other receivables

Financial assets

Plant and equipment

Total Non-Current Assets

TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES

CURRENT LIABILITIES

Trade and other payables

Total Current Liabilities

TOTAL LIABILITIES

NET ASSETS

EQUITY

Issued capital

Reserves

Accumulated losses

TOTAL EQUITY

Loss before income tax expense

Income tax benefit
Other comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax

Total comprehensive loss for the year

Parent Entity

2011

$

2010

$

1,781,147 

310,855 

2,092,002 

595,674 

70,861 

666,535 

13

863,227 

23,691

886,931 

- 

1,256,645 

34,427 

1,291,072 

2,978,933 

1,957,607 

297,851 

297,851 

130,106 

130,106 

297,851 

130,106 

2,681,082 

1,827,501 

14,516,700 

847,444 

11,723,878 

739,174 

(12,683,062)

(10,635,551)

2,681,082 

1,827,501 

(2,111,869)

204,022 

(139,664)

(2,047,511)

(522,353)

- 

- 

(522,353)

39

Page 56 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12.

DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION 

1. In the directors’ opinion: 

(a) 

the financial statements and notes set out on pages 26 to 56 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 
the financial statements and notes set out on pages 9 to 39 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 
2001 including: 

(i) 

(ii) 

complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting 
Interpretations), the Corporations Regulations 2001, professional reporting requirements and 
other mandatory requirements; and 

giving a true and fair view of the Consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2011 
and of its performance for the financial year ended on that date; and 

(b) 

there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they 
become due and payable; and 

(c) 

the financial statements and notes thereto are in accordance with International Financial Reporting 
Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.  

2. The directors have been given the declarations by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial 
Officer required by section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ended 30 June 2011.   

This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors. 

___________________ 
David Sargeant 
Managing Director  

Perth, Western Australia  
8 September 2011 

Page 56 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 57

40

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13.

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 

To the members of Empire Resources Limited 

Report on the Financial Report 

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  financial  report  of  Empire  Resources  Limited  (“the  company”), 
which  comprises  the  statement  of  financial  position  as  at  30  June  2011,  the  statement  of 
comprehensive  income,  the  statement  of  changes  in  equity  and  the  statement  of  cash flows  for  the 
year then ended, notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory 
information,  and  the  directors’  declaration  for  the  consolidated  entity.  The  consolidated  entity 
comprises the company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time to time during the 
financial year. 

Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Report  

The  directors  of  the  company  are  responsible  for  the  preparation  of  the  financial  report  that  gives  a 
true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 
and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the 
financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.  

In  Note  1(a),  the  directors  also  state,  in  accordance  with  Accounting  Standard  AASB  101: 
Presentation of Financial Statements that the consolidated financial report complies with International 
Financial Reporting Standards. 

Auditor’s Responsibility  

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted 
our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply 
with  relevant  ethical  requirements  relating  to  audit  engagements  and  plan  and  perform  the  audit  to 
obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.  

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures 
in  the  financial  report.  The  procedures  selected  depend  on  the  auditor’s  judgement,  including  the 
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. 
In  making  those  risk  assessments,  the  auditor  considers  internal  control  relevant  to  the  company’s 
preparation  and  fair  presentation  of  the  financial  report  in  order  to  design  audit  procedures  that  are 
appropriate  in  the  circumstances,  but  not  for  the  purpose  of  expressing  an  opinion  on  the 
An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness 
effectiveness of the company’s internal control.
of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, 
as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.  

Our  audit  did  not  involve  an  analysis  of  the  prudence  of  business  decisions  made  by  directors  or 
management. 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis 
for our audit opinion. 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership)  ABN 22 193 232 714 
Level 4, 130 Stirling Street Perth WA 6000.  PO Box 8124 Perth BC 6849 Telephone +61 (08) 9227 7500. Fax +61 (08) 9227 7533. 
Email: hlb@hlbwa.com.au.  Website: http://www.hlb.com.au 
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) is a member of 

 International, a worldwide organisation of accounting firms and business advisers. 

Page 58 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

41 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT (continued) 

Matters relating to the electronic presentation of the audited financial report 
This  auditor’s  report  relates  to  the  financial  report  and  remuneration  report  of  Empire  Resources 
Limited for the financial year ended 30 June 2011 included on Empire Resources Limited’s website. 
The  company’s  directors  are  responsible  for  the  integrity  of  the  Empire  Resources  Limited  website. 
We have not been engaged to report on the integrity of this website. The auditor’s report refers only to 
the financial report and remuneration report identified in this report. It does not provide an opinion on 
any  other  information  which may  have  been  hyperlinked  to/from  the financial  report.    If  users  of  the 
financial report are concerned  with the inherent risks arising from publication on a website, they are 
advised to refer to the hard copy of the audited financial report and remuneration report to confirm the 
information contained in this website version of the financial report. 

Independence

In conducting  our audit,  we have complied  with the  independence requirements of the Corporations 
Act 2001.   

Auditor’s Opinion  

In our opinion:  

(a) 

the  financial  report  of  Empire  Resources  Limited  is  in  accordance  with  the  Corporations  Act 
2001, including:  
(i) giving  a  true  and  fair  view  of  the  consolidated  entity’s  financial  position  as  at  30  June  2011 

and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and  

(b) 

(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and  
the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed 
in Note 1(a).  

Report on the Remuneration Report 

We  have  audited  the  Remuneration  Report  included  in  the  directors’  report  for  the  year  ended  30 
June 2011. The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the 
Remuneration  Report  in  accordance  with  section  300A  of  the  Corporations  Act  2001.  Our 
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in 
accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.  

Auditor’s Opinion  

In  our  opinion,  the  Remuneration  Report  of  Empire  Resources  Limited  for  the  year  ended  30  June 
2011 complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. 

HLB MANN JUDD 
Chartered Accountants 

Perth, Western Australia 
8 September 2011 

N G NEILL 
Partner  

42 

Page 58 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 59

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14.

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 

As lead auditor for the audit of the financial report of Empire Resources Limited for the year ended 30 
June 2011, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions 
of: 

a) 

the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit;  
and 

b)  any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit. 

Perth, Western Australia 
8 September 2011 

N G NEILL 
Partner, HLB Mann Judd 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership)  ABN 22 193 232 714 
Level 4, 130 Stirling Street Perth WA 6000.  PO Box 8124 Perth BC 6849 Telephone +61 (08) 9227 7500. Fax +61 (08) 9227 7533. 
Email: hlb@hlbwa.com.au.  Website: http://www.hlb.com.au 
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) is a member of 

 International, a worldwide organisation of accounting firms and business advisers. 

Page 60 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

43 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES 

Introduction 

Introduction 

Empire Resources Limited ("Company") has made it a priority to adopt systems of control and accountability as the basis 
for  the  administration  of  corporate  governance.  Some  of  these  policies  and  procedures  are  summarised  in  this 
statement. To the extent that they are applicable, and given its circumstances, the Company adopts the Eight Essential 
Corporate Governance Principles and Best Practice Recommendations ('Recommendations') published by the Corporate 
Governance Council of the ASX. 

Empire Resources Limited ("Company") has made it a priority to adopt systems of control and accountability as the basis 
for  the  administration  of  corporate  governance.  Some  of  these  policies  and  procedures  are  summarised  in  this 
statement. To the extent that they are applicable, and given its circumstances, the Company adopts the Eight Essential 
Corporate Governance Principles and Best Practice Recommendations ('Recommendations') published by the Corporate 
Governance Council of the ASX. 

Where  the  Company's  corporate  governance  practices  follow  a  recommendation,  the  Board  has  made  appropriate 
statements reporting on the adoption of the recommendation. Where, after due consideration, the Company's corporate 
governance practices depart from a recommendation, the Board has offered full disclosure and reason for the adoption 
of its own practice, in compliance with the "if not, why not" regime. 

Where  the  Company's  corporate  governance  practices  follow  a  recommendation,  the  Board  has  made  appropriate 
statements reporting on the adoption of the recommendation. Where, after due consideration, the Company's corporate 
governance practices depart from a recommendation, the Board has offered full disclosure and reason for the adoption 
of its own practice, in compliance with the "if not, why not" regime. 

As the Company's activities develop in size, nature and scope, the size of the Board and the implementation of additional 
corporate governance structures will be afforded further consideration. 

As the Company's activities develop in size, nature and scope, the size of the Board and the implementation of additional 
corporate governance structures will be afforded further consideration. 

DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES 

DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES 

Summary Statement 

Summary Statement 

Recommendation 

Recommendation 

If not, why not 

If not, why not 

Recommendation 

Recommendation 

ASX Principles and 
Recommendations 

ASX Principles and 
Recommendations 

If not, why not  

If not, why not  

ASX Principles 
ASX Principles 
and 
and 
Recommendations 
Recommendations 

X 

X 

Refer (a) below 

Refer (a) below 

4.3 

4.3 

Refer (a) below 

Refer (a) below 

4.4³ 

4.4³ 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

X 

X 

X 

√ 

√ 

X 

X 

√ 

X 

√ 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

√ 

√ 

X 

X 

√ 

X 

√ 

X 

X 

Refer (a) below 

Refer (a) below 

5.1 

5.1 

X 

X 

Refer (h) below 

Refer (h) below 

Refer (b) below 

Refer (b) below 

5.2 

5.2 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

Refer (b) below 

Refer (b) below 

6.1 

6.1 

X 

X 

Refer (i) below 

Refer (i) below 

Refer (b) below 

Refer (b) below 

6.2 

6.2 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

Refer (c) below 

Refer (c) below 

7.1 

7.1 

X 

X 

Refer (j) below 

Refer (j) below 

Refer (d) below 

Refer (d) below 

7.2 

7.2 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

Refer (e) below 

Refer (e) below 

7.3 

7.3 

√ 

√ 

Refer (k) below 

Refer (k) below 

Refer (f) below 

Refer (f) below 

7.4 

7.4 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

Refer (g) below 

Refer (g) below 

8.1 

8.1 

X 

X 

Refer (l) below 

Refer (l) below 

Refer (f) below 

Refer (f) below 

8.2 

8.2 

Refer (c) below 

Refer (c) below 

8.3 

8.3 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

1.1 

1.1 

1.2 

1.2 

1.3 

1.3 

2.1 

2.1 

2.2 

2.2 

2.3 

2.3 

2.4 

2.4 

2.5 

2.5 

2.6 

2.6 

3.1 

3.1 

3.2 

3.2 

3.3 

3.3 

4.1 

4.1 

4.2 

4.2 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

n/a 

44

44

Page 60 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 61

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(a) 

Principle 1 Recommendation 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 

Notification of Departure 

Empire  has  not  formally  disclosed  the  functions  reserved  to  the  Board  and  those  delegated  to  senior  executives.  The 
appointment of non-executive directors to the Board is not formalised in writing by way of a letter or other agreement. 

Explanation for Departure: 

The  Board  recognises  the  importance  of  distinguishing  between  the  respective  roles  and  responsibilities  of  the  Board 
and management. The Board has established an informal framework for the management of the Company and the roles 
and responsibilities of the Board and management. Due to the small size of the Board and of the Company, the Board do 
not think that it is necessary to formally document the roles of Board and management as it believes that these roles are 
being  carried  out  in  practice  and  are  clearly  understood  by  all  members  of  the  Board  and  management.  The  Board  is 
responsible  for  the  strategic  direction  of  the  Company,  establishing  goals  for  management  and  monitoring  the 
achievement of these goals, monitoring the overall corporate governance of the Company and ensuring that Shareholder 
value  is  increased.  The  Company  has  two  executives,  being  the  Managing  Director  and  an  executive  Director.  The 
Managing Director is responsible for ensuring that the Company achieves the goals established by the Board. 

The  appointments  of  non-executive  directors  are  formalised  in  accordance  with  the  regulatory  requirements  and  the 
Company’s constitution. 

(b) 

Principle 2 Recommendations 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 

Notification of departure 

The  Company  does  not  have  a  majority  of  independent  directors,  with  only  one  of  the  3  Board  members  being 
independent. 

Explanation for departure 

The  Board  considers  that  the  current  composition  of  the  Board  is  adequate  for  the  Company's  current  size  and 
operations  and  includes  an  appropriate  mix  of  skills  and  expertise  relevant  to  the  Company's  business.  The  current 
Board structure presently consists of the independent non-executive chairman, Mr Thomas Revy, the managing director 
(Mr David Sargeant) and one executive director (Mr Adrian Jessup), both of whom are not independent. The Company 
considers  that  each  of  the  directors  possess  skills  and  experience  suitable  for  building  the  Company.  It  is  the  Board's 
intention to appoint another independent director as and when the size and complexity of its operations changes and a 
suitable candidate is identified.  

(c) 

Principle 2 Recommendation 2.4 and Principle 4 Recommendations 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 

Notification of Departure 

Separate nomination and audit committees have not been formed. 

Explanation for Departure 

The Board considers that the Company is not currently of a size, or its affairs of such complexity, that the formation of 
separate or special committees is justified at this time. The Board as a whole is able to address the governance aspects 
of the full scope of the Company's activities and ensure that it adheres to appropriate ethical standards. 

In particular, the Board as a whole considers those matters that would usually be the responsibility of an audit committee 
and a nomination committee. The Board considers that, at this stage, no efficiencies or other benefits would be gained by 
establishing a separate audit committee or a separate nomination committee.  

(d) 

Principle 2 Recommendation 2.5 

Notification of Departure  

Empire does not have in place a formal process for evaluation of the Board, its committees, individual directors and key 
executives. 

Explanation for Departure 

Evaluation of the Board is carried out on a continuing and informal basis. The Company will put a formal process in place 
as and when the level of operations of the Company justifies this. 

(e) 

Principle 2 Recommendation 2.6 

Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to Reporting on Principle 2. 

Disclosure: 

Skills, Experience, Expertise and term of office of each Director 

A profile of each director containing their skills, experience, expertise and term of office is set out in the Directors' Report. 

45

Page 62 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
Identification of Independent Directors 

The independent director of the Company during the Reporting Period is disclosed in (b) above. 

Independence is measured having regard to the relationships listed in Box 2.1 of the Principles & Recommendations. 

Statement concerning availability of Independent Professional Advice 

To assist directors with independent judgement, it is the Board's policy that if a director considers it necessary to obtain 
independent  professional  advice  to  properly  discharge  the  responsibility  of  their  office  as  a  director  then,  provided  the 
director first obtains approval for incurring such expense from the Chair, the Company will pay the reasonable expenses 
associated with obtaining such advice. 

Nomination Matters 

The full Board sits in its capacity as a Nomination Committee. 

Performance Evaluation 

During the Reporting Period the performance evaluations for the Board and individual directors did occur in accordance 
with the disclosed process in Recommendation 2.5.  

Selection and Reappointment of Directors 

The  Board  considers  the  balance  of  independent  directors  on  the  Board  as  well  as  the  skills  and  qualifications  of 
potential candidates that will best enhance the Board's effectiveness. 

Each director other than the managing director must retire from office no later than the longer of the third annual general 
meeting of the company or 3 years following that director’s last election or appointment. At each annual general meeting 
a  minimum  of  one  director  or  a  third  of  the  total  number  of  directors  must  resign.  A  director  who  retires  at  an  annual 
general meeting is eligible for re-election at that meeting. Reappointment of directors is not automatic. 

(f) 

Principle 3 Recommendation 3.1, 3.3 

Notification of Departure 

Empire has not established a formal code of conduct. 

Explanation for Departure: 

The Board considers that its business practices, as determined by the Board and key executives, are the equivalent of a 
code of conduct. 

(g) 

Principle 3 Recommendation 3.2 

Companies  should  establish  a  policy  concerning  trading  in  company  securities  by  directors,  senior  executives  and 
employees, and disclose the policy or a summary of that policy. 

Disclosure: 

The board has adopted a policy  which prohibits dealing the Company's securities by directors, officers and employees 
when those persons possess inside information. The policy prohibits short term or speculative trading of the Company's 
securities. The policy provides that permission be obtained from the Chairman prior to trading. 

(h) 

Principle 5 Recommendation 5.1, 5.2 

Notification of Departure  

Empire  has  not  established  written  policies  and  procedures  designed  to  ensure  compliance  with  ASX  Listing  Rule 
disclosure requirements and accountability for compliance. 

Explanation for Departure 

The  Directors  have  a  long  history  of  involvement  with  public  listed  companies  and  are  familiar  with  the  disclosure 
requirements of the ASX listing rules. 

The Company has in place informal procedures that it believes are sufficient for ensuring compliance with ASX Listing 
Rule  disclosure requirements  and  accountability  for  compliance. The  Board  has  nominated the  Managing  Director  and 
the Company Secretary as being responsible for all matters relating to disclosure.  

46

Page 62 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 63

 
 
 
 
 
(i) 

Principle 6 Recommendation 6.1, 6.2 

Notification of Departure  

Empire has not established a formal Shareholder communication strategy. 

Explanation for Departure 

While the Company has not established a formal Shareholder communication strategy, it actively communicates with its 
Shareholders  in  order  to  identify  their  expectations  and actively  promotes  Shareholder involvement  in  the  Company.  It 
achieves this by posting on its website copies of all information lodged with the ASX. Shareholders with internet access 
are  encouraged  to  provide  their  email  addresses  in  order  to  receive  electronic  copies  of  information  distributed  by  the 
Company. Alternatively, hard copies of information distributed by the Company are available on request. 

(j) 

Principle 7 Recommendation 7.1, 7.2 

Notification of Departure 

Empire has an informal risk oversight and management policy and internal compliance and control system. 

Explanation for Departure 

The Board does not currently have formal procedures in place but is aware of the various risks that affect the Company 
and its particular business. Section 8 of the prospectus dated 7 November 2006 provides a summary of the relevant risk 
factors that may affect the Company. As the Company develops, the Board will develop appropriate procedures to deal 
with risk oversight and management and internal compliance, taking into account the size of the Company and the stage 
of development of its projects. 

(k) 

Principle 7 Recommendation 7.3 

The Board should  disclose  whether  it  has received assurance from the Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent) and the 
Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent) that the declaration provided in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations 
Act is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in 
all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks. 

Disclosure: 

The Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent) and the Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent) have provided a declaration to 
the Board in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act and have assured the Board that such declaration is 
founded  on a  sound  system  of risk  management  and  internal control and that the system  is operating  effectively  in  all 
material respects in relation to financial risk. 

(l) 

Principle 8 Recommendations 8.1 

Notification of departure  

Empire  does  not  have  a  formal  remuneration  policy  and  has  not  established  a  separate  remuneration  committee. 
Directors and management may receive options or shares. 

Explanation for Departure 

The current remuneration of the Directors is disclosed in the Directors’ Report. Non-executive Directors receive a fixed 
fee for their services and may also receive options or shares. The issue of options or shares to non-executive Directors 
may be an appropriate method of providing sufficient incentive and reward while maintaining cash reserves.  
Due  to  the  Company's  early  stage  of  development  and  small  size,  it  does  not  consider  that  a  separate  remuneration 
committee  would add any efficiency to the process of determining the levels of remuneration for the Directors and key 
executives.  The  Board  believes  it  is  more  appropriate  to  set  aside  time  at  specified  Board  meetings  each  year  to 
specifically  address  matters  that  would  ordinarily  fall  to  a  remuneration  committee.  In  addition,  all  matters  of 
remuneration  will  continue  to  be  in  accordance  with  regulatory  requirements,  especially  in  respect  of  related  party 
transactions; that is, none of the Directors will participate in any deliberations regarding their own remuneration or related 
issues. 

47

Page 64 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
16.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 

Additional information required by the Australian Stock Exchange Ltd and not shown elsewhere in this report is 
as follows. The information is current as at 6 October 2011.  

(a) Distribution of shares  

The numbers of shareholders, by size of holding are: 

Category (size of holding)

1 - 1,000
1,001 - 5,000
5,001 - 10,000
10,001 - 100,000
100,001 - and over

Number
of Holders

23 
77 
140 
411 
223 
874

The number of shareholdings held in less than marketable parcels is 120. 

(b) Twenty largest shareholders  

The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted shares are: 

SHAREHOLDERS

RBJ NOM PL                    
KIRKDALE HLDGS PL             
AGENS PL                      
MEEKAL PL                     
ANKAA SPRINGS PL              
A N SUPER PL                  
BLAMNCO TRADING PL            
TRONES INV PL                 
SUHARITDUMRONG SUKHON         

1 WESTORIA RESOURCE INV LTD     
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 H WALLACE-SMITH & CO PL       
12 D W SARGEANT PL               
13 CANARY PL                     
14 HOLDREY PL                    
15 MCCUBBING BRIAN               
16
LENNARD JUDITH BARRETT-       
17
FIRST FARLEY PL               
18 COLTRANGE PL                  
19 MARTINI 5 PL                  
20 DRAPER NICHOLAS S + M J       

Number of 
shares held % Holding

3,698,571
3,313,306
3,300,000
3,275,806
3,098,333
3,056,160
3,000,000
3,000,000
2,800,000
2,268,500
2,110,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
1,907,776
1,900,000
1,700,000
1,700,000
1,527,677
1,470,000
1,310,000
48,436,129

2.60%
2.33%
2.32%
2.30%
2.18%
2.15%
2.11%
2.11%
1.97%
1.59%
1.48%
1.41%
1.41%
1.34%
1.34%
1.19%
1.19%
1.07%
1.03%
0.92%
34.04%  

48

Page 64 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 65

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(c) Stock Exchange Listing  

Listing has been granted for all the ordinary shares of the company on all Member Exchanges of the Australian 
Stock Exchange Limited except for the following which are not quoted by virtue of restriction agreements.  

Quoted shares on ASX and total issued share capital 

142,295,921 

(d) Voting rights  

All shares carry one vote per unit without restriction.  

(e) Unlisted options 

Unlisted options (Ex Price 13.7 cents; Exp 25 June 2013) 

2,700,000 

Unlisted options (Ex Price 15 cents; Exp 2 June 2013) 

Unlisted options (Ex Price 9 cents; Exp 9 August 2014) 

8,227,729 

1,500,000 

49

Page 66 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INTERESTS IN MINING AND EXPLORATION TENEMENTS 
as 30 September 2011 

PROJECT 

TENEMENT 

INTEREST 

REMARKS 

Application not yet granted 
Application not yet granted 
Application not yet granted 

TROY CREEK 

PENNY'S FIND 

YUINMERY 

E69/1729 
E69/2357 
E69/2358 
E69/2485 
E69/2869 
E69/2870 
P69/45 

E27/410 
E27/420 
M27/156 
P27/1713 
P27/1714 
P27/1715 
P27/1716 
P27/1717 
P27/1718 
P27/1719 
P27/1720 
P27/1721 
P27/1722 
P27/1723 
P27/1724 
P27/1725 
P27/1726 
P27/1727 
P27/1728 
P27/1729 
P27/1730 
P27/1731 
P27/1814 
P27/1922 
P27/1923 
P27/1962 
P27/2007 
P27/2008 

M57/265 
P57/1214 
P57/1215 
P57/1216 
P57/1217 
E57/735 
E57/766 
E57/783 
E57/840 

45% 
45% 
45% 

45% 

60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 
60% 

100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 

50

Page 66 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 67

 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
PROJECT 

YUINMERY  
OPTION 

WYNNE 

TENEMENT 

INTEREST 

REMARKS 

E57/514 
E57/524 
E57/681 
P57/1130 
P57/1131 

E08/1979 
E08/2275 

Option for 82% Interest 
Option for 82% Interest 
Option for 82% Interest 
Option for 82% Interest 
Option for 82% Interest 

100% 

Application not yet granted 

51

Page 68 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Page 68 

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL REPORT  2011

EMPIRE RESOURCES LIMITED  –  ANNUAL  REPORT  2011 

Page 69

 
 
E
M
P

I

R
E

R
E
S
O
U
R
C
E
S

L
I

M

I
T
E
D

–

A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

2
0
1
1