Quarterlytics / Technology / Information Technology Services / Erdene Resource Development Corporation.

Erdene Resource Development Corporation.

erd · ASX Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker erd
Exchange ASX
Sector Technology
Industry Information Technology Services
Employees 201-500
← All annual reports
FY2024 Annual Report · Erdene Resource Development Corporation.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Annual 
Report 
2024

PAGE 2 
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
CHAIR LETTER 
PAGE 6
FROM THE CEO‘S
PAGE 8
MATERIAL TOPICS
PAGE 10
PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
PAGE 14
OUR STRATEGY
PAGE 20
SUSTAINABLE GROWTH & 
COMMERCIAL APPROACH
PAGE 26
OUR CUSTOMERS AND COMMUNITIES
PAGE 32
OUR ENVIRONMENT
PAGE 40
OUR PEOPLE
PAGE 46
LEADERSHIP
PAGE 50
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE 106
GOVERNANCE REPORT
PAGE 124
REMUNERATION REPORT
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Non-GAAP Measures 
EROAD has used non-GAAP measures when discussing 
financial performance in this document. The directors 
and management believe that these measures provide 
useful information as they are used internally to evaluate 
performance of business units, to establish operational 
goals and to allocate resources. Non-GAAP measures are 
not prepared in accordance with NZ IFRS (New Zealand 
International Financial Reporting Standards) and are not 
uniformly defined, therefore the non-GAAP measures 
reported in this document may not be comparable with 
those that other companies report and should not be 
viewed in isolation or considered as a substitute for 
measures reported by EROAD in accordance with NZ 
IFRS. The non-GAAP measures EROAD have used are, 
Annualised Monthly Recurring Revenue (AMRR), Costs 
to Acquire Customers (CAC), Costs to Service & Support 
(CTS), EBITDA, Normalised EBITDA, EBITDA margin, 
Normalised EBITDA margin, Normalised Revenue, Free 
Cash Flow and Future Contracted Income (FCI).
A detailed reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to 
EROAD’s reported financial information is included on 
EROAD’s website 
http://www.eroadglobal.com/global/investors/
About this Report
The 2024 Annual Report describes EROAD’s strategy, 
financial performance and includes the Corporate 
Governance Statement, Sustainability Report and the 
Remuneration Report. All numbers relate to the 12 months 
ended 31 March 2024 (FY24) and comparisons relate to 
the 12 months ended 31 March 2023 (FY23), unless stated 
otherwise. All dollar amounts are in NZD, unless otherwise 
stated. This report covers the 12 months ended 31 March 
2024 and is dated 23 May 2024.
This report has been approved by the Board and is signed 
on behalf of EROAD Limited by Susan Paterson, Chairman 
and David Green, Chair of the Finance Risk and Audit 
Committee.
David Green
Chair of the Finance, Risk 
and Audit Committee
Susan Paterson 
Chair
EROAD acknowledges the Tangata Whenua of New Zealand, the Indigenous 
Nations and First Peoples of Australia, and the Custodians of the lands and 
waterways in the United States of America where our offices are located. 
We express our gratitude and appreciation to these peoples for sharing their 
culture and traditions and for their stewardship of these lands. We recognise 
and pay respect to their Elders, past, present, and emerging.​
Contents
PAGE 2 

EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Chair Letter
Dear Shareholders,
As I reflect on this fiscal year—my first as Chair 
of EROAD—it is my pleasure to address you 
through our comprehensive annual report. FY24 
has been one of significant strategic delivery and 
excellent performance, as EROAD executed to 
plan, continued to add value to customers and, 
ultimately, to shareholders. 
In considering an eventful year, the company 
is now much better positioned for the future 
than it was 12 months ago. From responding to 
an unsolicited, non binding indicative offer, a 
recapitalisation to give us more strategic flexibility, 
through to the appointment of David Kenneson as 
Co-CEO in March, EROAD has maintained a firm 
focus on turning around the core of the business 
and laying foundations for growth.
Today, EROAD is stronger, leaner, smarter and 
more sustainable. It has the right skills, capital 
structure, cost-base, product-set and customer 
focus to capitalise on growth opportunities ahead. 
The encouraging FY24 financial and operational 
results demonstrate the company is on the right 
track and reinforces the Board‘s conviction in its 
strategic direction. 
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
The FY24 result met or exceeded all of the guidance metrics 
set at the start of the year, demonstrating the discipline and 
progress made as EROAD moves the business to being cash 
flow positive for FY25. This financial health, allied with a more 
flexible balance sheet, is crucial as EROAD continues to make 
targeted investments in innovation and market expansion, 
aimed at delivering long-term success and shareholder value. 
This year has reinforced the strength and resilience of EROAD 
across the three operational markets, with each achieving 
growth in revenue. EROAD‘s enduring success in New Zealand 
continues to be the foundation of its financial strategy, acting 
as the engine and providing the capital necessary to pursue 
expansive opportunities in North America. 
LEADING FOR GROWTH 
As is true in all organisations, success requires having the 
right people, with the right skills and experience, at the right 
time. Accordingly EROAD regularly reviews the make-up of 
its teams to address any gaps, and ensure it has the necessary 
roles in place. To equip the team for the next phase in our 
strategy the Board agreed we needed to increase our global 
growth capability, and North American market expertise at an 
executive level.  
Consistent with this focus to continue to invest in building our 
growth expertise, earlier this year Mark Heine came to the 
Board with a proposal for a Co-CEO model that enhances our 
leadership capabilities and addresses the unique challenges 
and opportunities of each market. In March 2024 the Board 
approved the model and, appointed David Kenneson as Co-
CEO alongside Mark. 
David is a highly experienced global executive with more 
than 25 years of leadership experience across high-tech, 
manufacturing, and professional services industries. David’s 
expertise in business transformation and operational 
excellence for growth and scale, combined with his energy 
and entrepreneurial spirit, complement the solid turnaround 
in EROAD’s financial performance led by Mark. As Co-CEO’s, 
Mark and David are already proving to be a strong team, 
bringing renewed energy to our North American growth 
aspirations, while expanding on EROAD‘s footprint in New 
Zealand for both staff and customers.
SUSTAINABILITY AND OPERATIONAL 
EXCELLENCE
As a Board, we are fully committed to ensuring EROAD 
contributes to the sustainability of its operations and those 
of its customers. Sustainability is integral to EROAD‘s 
decision-making process, ensuring we balance immediate 
business needs with long-term environmental and societal 
goals. At EROAD, we are all committed to maintaining 
ethical practices that benefit our employees, customers, 
shareholders, and the planet. 
In response to the increasing environmental scrutiny facing 
our customers across transport and construction sectors, 
EROAD has intensified sustainability initiatives to meet the 
needs of customers. Several emissions focused products and 
features were launched this year - with many more currently 
in test and on our roadmap - the most notable being the 
Sustainability Module developed in partnership with EECA 
launched in September 2023.  These innovations are pivotal 
in helping customers actively reduce their carbon emissions, 
meet climate reporting requirements, and develop a deeper 
understanding of the impact of their operations as we move 
toward a more sustainable future for all.
Reflecting our commitment to the importance of sustainability, 
this year‘s report brings together financial and sustainability 
performance in one. We have made significant advancements 
in our sustainability initiatives and reporting, building on last 
year‘s efforts and demonstrating our ongoing resolve to 
improving our impact on the environment and society. 
In addition to ongoing improvements for customers through 
product innovations, EROAD continues to make significant 
steps in prioritising sustainability measures across the 
business. 
Changes made to the EROAD fleet in FY23 resulted in a 16% 
reduction in Scope 1 emissions for FY24. As we returned to 
more in-person collaboration across our offices, the additional 
electricity usage increased our Scope 2 emissions by 9% 
on an absolute basis. For FY25 results we expect to see the 
emissions reflect the consolidation of physical offices that 
occurred in late FY24.
In preparation for New Zealand’s climate-related disclosures 
(“CRD“), throughout FY24 we engaged PwC to assist us with 
understanding our climate change risks and opportunities. 
This included considering climate change scenarios, and 
assessing and setting our metrics and targets. Our full CRD 
report will be available at https://eroadglobal.com/investors/ 
by 31 July 2024
GOVERNANCE AND BOARD DYNAMICS
As we further expand our presence into North America, we 
are taking steps to ensure the Board have the appropriate 
backgrounds to reflect our geographical market mix, and 
growth priorities.    
We are delighted to welcome Cameron Kinloch and David 
Green to our Board. David, based in Auckland, offers deep 
leadership experience from the banking and finance sector, 
enhancing our capabilities in financial oversight and risk 
management as Chair of the Finance, Risk & Audit Committee. 
David also serves on the People & Culture Committee, 
supporting our focus on leadership and organisational 
development. 
Cameron, from California, brings considerable experience 
in strategic financial management from her global roles 
in various high-growth companies which she brings as a 
member of the Finance, Risk & Audit Committee. Their 
combined expertise will further strengthen our Board’s ability 
to guide our strategic direction and governance. 
We also express our gratitude to Graham Stuart for his 
dedicated leadership and contributions, especially during 
his tenure as Chair, which have profoundly shaped EROAD’s 
trajectory. Graham officially resigned from the EROAD Board 
on 31 March 2024.
LOOKING FORWARD
Looking ahead, while pleased with the excellent progress 
made in FY24, we know that the economic environment and 
market conditions for EROAD‘s enterprise customers remains 
challenging. 
For FY25 and beyond the company will remain focused on 
fiscal and operational discipline, combined with considered 
investment in growth, through expansion within our key 
markets, deepening engagement and product adoption 
with existing customers, while continuing to enhance our 
product offerings to meet the evolving needs of the market, 
for example in sustainability management and time of use 
charging. 
Despite the uncertain macroeconomic conditions, EROAD 
goes into FY25 with solid foundations in place, a laser focus 
on continuing to deliver to targets, and a growing confidence 
in the long-term potential of the business. As a result, our 
guidance for the FY25 year is between $190m to $195m.
Our strategic priorities are clear, leadership is strong, and our 
governance structure is robust, ensuring that EROAD remains 
responsive to both opportunities and challenges.
APPRECIATION AND 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I extend my sincere gratitude to our team, partners, and you, 
our shareholders, for your ongoing support and commitment 
during this period of resetting the foundations of the business.
Thank you for your continued partnership and confidence in 
our vision.
Susan Paterson
Chair
PAGE 5
PAGE 4 
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024

PAGE 6 
PAGE 7
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
From the CEOs
EFFICIENCY GAINS
In reviewing our costs, we were able to consolidate functions, 
renegotiate contracts, and simplify our supplier mix. In 
turn, we removed a further $10m of annualised costs and 
built a stronger operating model and culture in the process. 
Combined with the $10m from FY23, we have successfully 
delivered on our promise in FY23 to remove $20m in 
annualised costs from the business. This was a companywide 
effort to achieve, and we are grateful for the way EROADers 
stepped up, embraced the challenge and celebrated one 
another throughout as Cost Cutting Heroes.
Importantly, as forecast, our Free Cash Flow continues to 
improve, reaching FCF positive $1.3m for the financial year and 
we expect to be FCF positive for FY25.
LEADING AS TWO
During our initial engagement - addressing growth 
opportunities in North America over the second half of the 
year - we formed a solid working relationship that highlights 
the strengths and experiences each of us possess.
Since moving to Co-CEO model in March 2024, we have 
formalised our ways of working to build on that; with David 
focused on growth and customer, and Mark on product and 
operations. While we maintain dedicated focus areas and are 
physically located between North America and New Zealand, 
we operate as a collaborative partnership to lead EROAD.
With our customers, partners and teams all in different phases, 
with differing needs depending on the market, we are now 
better placed to provide the support, guidance and confidence 
they need.
ENTERPRISE VALUE
In line with the operational strategy we shared in FY23, we 
have continued to capitalise on our position as a provider 
to enterprise and turned our attention to building out the 
capabilities needed to serve enterprise customers at scale, 
reduce cost to serve, and create operating leverage.
Across existing enterprise customers who renewed contracts 
in FY24, more than half signed up for an expanded offering, 
with an average unit increase of 69% of the original. With 
operations established to directly target expansions into whole 
of fleet for enterprise, we are confident these metrics will 
improve, and be a smoother process to achieve. Specific areas 
of focus include: 
•	 Refinements to our account management practices
•	 Increase customer marketing for multi-product awareness 
and engagement
•	 Improve cross functional engagement around key accounts
•	 Shorten implementation and rollout times
•	 Ensure sales capability is aligned to priority areas
While the above areas are critical for our ability to expand and 
scale, it is through our product innovation that we maintain an 
edge for both new and existing customers.
Throughout FY24 we have worked on several products and 
features that will have a big impact on our future pipeline. 
Some highlights include:
•	 Truck Route Manager: Developed through our contract 
with Sysco, and will be made available to all customers 
following the conclusion of pilot testing. More than 
500,000 trips have used it to date. 
•	 Predictive AI for Reefer Maintenance: Currently being 
trialled with key customers, we’re preventing lost loads and 
breakdowns via predictive analytics.  
•	 Thermo King OEM Integration: Expanding our eco system 
by supplying our cold chain products directly to TK 
refrigerated trailers. In turn increasing time to value for 
customers, reducing need for additional hardware, and 
providing higher margin revenue to EROAD.  
SUSTAINABILITY & GROWTH 
As we move into the next phase of our turnaround strategy, 
we do so with the understanding that cost base rigour must 
be maintained. We continue to make targeted and intentional 
investments that deliver benefits that can scale across our 
global customer base, and open doors for new deals to be 
explored. In doing so, we carefully balance growth ambitions 
with profitability to maintain a sustainable business.
A growing area of interest we continue to invest in is 
environmental sustainability. Regulations, reporting and 
target setting across all markets are intensifying and our 
Dear Shareholders,
In FY23 we made a commitment to you; that 
we would return the focus of EROAD to our 
customers, remove non-essential costs, and put 
the foundations in place to take advantage of 
growth opportunities, including in our largest 
market of North America. It is a privilege to 
present the annual results to you today that have 
delivered on exactly that.
With a renewed focus on customer, in FY24 we 
have achieved global revenue of $182m – slightly 
ahead of guidance – with top line growth being 
delivered in all 3 markets. We are also pleased 
to report that EROAD met or exceeded our 
guidance targets across all measures set at the 
start of the year.
This turnaround has provided us with a robust 
operating platform and with the leverage to 
expand, diversify and grow in coming years, and 
with a lower cost to serve per unit than previously.
customers are placing increased interest in ways to minimise 
their emissions. For our enterprise customers, there is added 
attention and scrutiny for making meaningful reductions 
in emissions, and having the data to report on them 
transparently. 
We have made several additions to our products in support 
of this, and continue to invest in it as a key component of our 
long term strategy. Some developments for FY24 include:
•	 Launch of our Sustainability Module for New Zealand 
customers in September 2023, with adoption far exceeding 
the targets we set
•	 Launched a free public facing emissions calculator for New 
Zealand fleets to benchmark their fleet’s emissions profile
•	 eTRU partnership delivering two-way Reefer features and 
EV Power System data for battery powered refrigerated 
trailers connected via Nivalis
•	 Purchase and manage RUC licences for Electric and Plug-in 
Hybrid vehicles in MyEROAD
More exploration of our emissions focused products can be 
found on page 34. We have significant opportunity to provide 
meaningful interventions for our customers in this space and 
are committed to ongoing delivery of solutions that have a 
positive impact on emissions reductions.
PEOPLE 
In further strengthening of our foundations, we have made 
two new key appointments to our executive team; Duanne 
O’Brien will be joining us in June of this year to lead our 
platform, application and design teams as Chief Technology 
Officer in Auckland. 
Additionally, Mark Davidson joined us in April to transform 
our go to market approach in a new position of EVP Sales & 
Marketing North America. 
LOOKING AHEAD 
Our New Zealand business remains strong, with emerging 
opportunity to capitalise on eRUC further as governments 
everywhere explore options to manage congestion and 
maximise network efficiency.
North America remains our biggest priority for growth as 
we look to leverage our credibility and experience in winning 
new accounts, while increasing penetration into existing 
customers via whole of fleet solutions to support more of their 
operations.   
Having executed the operational changes required to realign 
the business around our customers, and implement tighter 
cost controls, we go into FY25 with renewed confidence in our 
strategy, and our ability to execute. 
Thank you for your ongoing support.
Mark Heine & David Kenneson 
Co-CEOs 

PAGE 8 
PAGE 9
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
About EROAD 
We provide end-to-end 
technology solutions which 
connect vehicles, drivers, 
assets and operations to help 
businesses make real-time 
decisions from real-time data. 
Helping run safer, greener, more 
productive businesses.
OUR PURPOSE 
Delivering intelligence 
you can trust, for a better 
world tomorrow 
At EROAD, we believe you can’t plan where you are 
going tomorrow, if you don’t know where you are 
today. The businesses we serve are at the heart of their 
local economies. They don’t just need data, they need 
intelligence. Reliable, accurate and real-time insight 
enabling them to make decisions which move us all 
forward towards a safer and more sustainable future. 
THIS REPORT 
In support of our ongoing commitment to sustainability, 
EROAD conducts an annual materiality assessment to 
pinpoint the key sustainability issues, risks, and opportunities 
that are most relevant to our business and stakeholders. 
Through stakeholder consultations, product impact 
reviews, and alignment with global standards such as the 
UN‘s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the GRI 
standards, we identify our material topics.
In recognition of the link between sustainability and 
commercial success, we have integrated our material topics 
into the framework for reporting this year. Accordingly, this 
report represents a consolidation of our annual financial 
and sustainability performance, regulatory disclosures, and 
reporting obligations. By structuring our reporting around 
these material themes, we aim to provide a comprehensive 
overview of our company‘s performance and its impact on 
both financial and sustainability fronts.
OUR MATERIAL TOPICS 
UN SDGs 
Our Commercial Approach 
Sustainable and growing financial returns 
Innovative and reliable products to solve customer problems 
Maintain high integrity of data and security 
Our Customers & Communities
Healthier, safer & more sustainable communities 
Sensible, long term cost effective regulatory solutions 
Sustainable and efficient supply chain and 
transportation network  
Our Environment
Emissions Reduction and the road to Net Zero for Customers 
Divert waste from landfill 
Innovative environmentally conscious culture  
Our People
Foster a diverse and inclusive culture	
 
Be a desirable place to work	  
Develop strong, empowered leaders   
EROAD IN THE 
CIRCULAR ECONOMY
Production & 
Purchasing 
Consumption 
& Use 
Collection & 
Processing 
E-WASTE PROGRAM (NZ) 
REFURBISHED UNITS 
SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT 
FOR ACCESS TO PARTS FOR 
REPAIRS & REFURBS 
FUEL (FLEET & TRAVEL) 
ENERGY (OFFICE) 
INTEGRATIONS WITH OEM TO 
UTILISE EXISTING HARDWARE 
OTA UPDATES TO HARDWARE 
FUEL - ROUTE MANAGEMENT, 
IDLING, MAINTENANCE 
ASSET UTILISATION - EFFICIENT 
USAGE OF EXISTING EQUIPMENT 
SAFETY - SAFER DRIVING 
REDUCES INCIDENTS RESULTING 
IN LOST LOADS, COSTLY REPAIRS 
ETC 
DESIGN 
QUALITY CONTROL & TESTING 
INVENTORY MANAGEMENT  
FREIGHT 
MAINTENANCE OF VEHICLES 
EXTENDS LIFE 
ASSET UTILISATION FOR 
ACCURATE PURCHASING 
OF EQUIPMENT 
DATA TO INFORM PURCHASING 
VIA EV BENCHMARKING 
PREDICTIVE SHUTDOWN - 
PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE 
EXTENDED REUSABILITY OF 
FLEET RESOURCES INCLUDING 
REPURPOSE OF VEHICLES
DATA-DRIVEN ASSET 
DECOMMISSIONING AND 
RECYCLING (SELL, REPURPOSE 
OR RECYCLE DECISIONS)
PAGE 9
PAGE 8 

PAGE 10 
Performance 
Highlights
EBIT (REPORTED) 
$0.8m 
FY23: $1.7m 
EBIT (NORMALISED)² 
$4.4m 
FY23: ($4.5m)  
COST OUT  
$10m
FY23: $10m
REVENUE 
$182m  
FY23: $165.3m¹  
FUTURE CONTRACTED INCOME 
$262.7m 
FY23: $219.6m 
ASSET RETENTION 
94.8%  
FY23: 94.8%  
FREE CASH FLOW³ 
$1.3m 
FY23: ($29.9m)  
AMRR 
$177.8m  
FY23: $153.7m  
CONNECTED UNITS 
250,890 
FY23: 227,149  
NET UNIT ADDS 
23,741  
FY23: 18,452  
SCOPE 1  tCO2e
140.77 
FY23: 167.63   
SCOPE 2 tCO2e
89.3  
FY23: 82.11  
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
PAGE 11
¹ Normalised for $9.6m in FY23 for accounting adjustment related to contingent consideration.
² Normalised for 4G hardware upgrade costs of $3.6m in FY24 and integration costs of $3.4m in FY23.
³ Free cash flow to the firm excludes financing costs.

EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
PAGE 13
PAGE 12 
Regional 
Highlights
New Zealand
Australia
North America
UNITS 
124,417  
UNITS 
106,860 
UNITS 
19,613  
NET UNIT ADDS 
7,962  
NET UNIT ADDS 
11,802  
NET UNIT ADDS 
3,977  
ASSET RETENTION 
94.8%  
ASSET RETENTION 
94.8%  
ASSET RETENTION 
95.5%  
EBITDA 
$62.2m
15.8% 
EBITDA
$22m
21.5%
EBITDA
$3m
36.4%
SaaS ARPU 
$58.30  
4.7% 
SaaS ARPU 
$60.92
3.7% 
SaaS ARPU 
$45.44
2% 

PAGE 14 
PAGE 15
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
The value we deliver 
Our Strategy
Compliance
Safety
RUC compliance 
Hours of Service logs 
Fuel tax reporting
Driver tools 
Vehicle maintenance 
Driver behaviour 
CONSTRUCTION & CONCRETE 
FIRST RESPONDERS 
UTILITIES 
COURIER & DELIVERY 
WASTE & RECYCLING 
OPTIMISING EFFICIENCY FOR:          VEHICLES          DRIVERS          ROADS          LOADS          OPERATIONS 
EROAD is at the intersection of our customers’ physical and 
digital operations.  
We deliver a connected network of tools and support they need to 
stay compliant and operate safely, efficiently, and sustainably. 
Sustainability
Efficiency 
Route management 
Predictive maintenance 
Asset utilisation 
Fuel & Idling reports 
Decarbonisation & 
emissions reporting tools 
Electric Vehicle support
TRANSPORT & LOGISTICS 
PUBLIC TRANSPORT 
FIELD SERVICES 
FOOD & BEVERAGE

PAGE 16 
PAGE 17
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Reflection
Through FY24 we remained resolute in the execution 
of our operational strategy to turn around the core 
of the business, renew our focus on customers, and 
establish the solid foundations for our next stage of 
growth. Our focus on fiscal control was reflected in 
our ongoing cost management initiatives, where we 
achieved substantial operational efficiencies through 
supplier renegotiations, consolidation of offices, and 
enhancements in our supply chain processes.
We strengthened our commitment to making 
intentional investments that offer scalable payoffs. 
We strategically focused on developing solutions and 
innovations that, whilst initially tailored to meet the 
demands of individual key customers, are designed to 
benefit a broader segment across different markets. 
This approach ensures that our investments are not 
just about meeting immediate needs but creating 
value that extends across our customer base.
Our long-term growth strategy is 
designed to build upon our strengths 
that pave the way for sustainable 
scalable growth.  
We have distilled our priority 
areas into five segments; each one 
delivering a benefit to the next, 
increasing the value we offer, and 
driving our momentum.
These strategic priorities focus on: 
•	 The value of listening to our 
customers  
•	 The products we make 
•	 Our eco system of partners 
•	 The richness of our data 
•	 How we sell to and service 
customers
CUSTOMER-LED
Our value as a company is tied 
to the customers who choose 
us, who grow with us, and the 
lessons we learn with them 
to inform our roadmap and 
operations. The trust we earn 
is a multiplier for being the 
provider of choice for large 
fleet operations.
Our Strategy
9,500 +
Sysco rollout units
+50%
Enterprise customers 
increase orders at 
contract renewal
Path to Free Cash Flow Positive
OUR FY25 PRIORITIES:
•	 Whole fleet expansion 
•	 Customer retention 
•	 Enterprise growth
OUR PRODUCTS
With more than 250,000 
connected units globally, our 
customers rely on us to provide 
a solid, reliable platform today, 
while continuously innovating 
to add more value to their 
operations for tomorrow. We 
remain focused on delivering 
products that improve safety, 
efficiency and sustainability 
across fleet operations. 
ECO SYSTEM OF PARTNERS 
Our partnership ecosystem is a vital 
component of our offerings to customers 
and a key driver of our growth. 
Technology integrations with third parties 
offer benefits of contextually rich data, 
quicker time to value for customers, and 
ensure EROAD product development 
is focused on our core offerings. In 
addition, our network of channel partners 
increases our growth opportunities and 
reach to customers. 
RICH DATA  
We are focused on having 
a streamlined, actionable 
data platform that turns 
data into true intelligence for 
customers. AI developments 
mean that data can be used to 
empower operators to move 
from reporting on activity, to 
predicting, preventing, and 
controlling outcomes. 
DELIVERY   
In recognition of the varied nature 
of our customers by industry 
and size, we have evolved our 
models to ensure we deliver 
service levels that meet customer 
need and increase retention & 
expansion opportunities. The 
same approach is applied to our 
go to market, where messaging, 
budget allocation and approach is 
aligned to customer and potential 
opportunity. 
FY25 roadmap & strategy
OUR FY25 PRIORITIES:
•	 Compliance 
•	 Safety 
•	 Sustainability
OUR FY25 PRIORITIES:
•	 Third Party Systems 
•	 OEM integrations 
•	 Channel partners 
OUR FY25 PRIORITIES:
•	 AI Assistant 
•	 Fleet benchmarking
•	 Predictive interventions
OUR FY25 PRIORITIES:
•	 Sales and marketing alignment 
•	 Go to market plans 
•	 Tiered service models 
PARTNERS 
A growing network 
of partnerships and 
integrations
CUSTOMER-LED 
Listening to and 
innovating for 
customers 
PRODUCT SUITE 
A robust platform 
of interconnected 
apps and devices
DATA & AI
Predictive and 
preventative 
functionality 
powered by AI
DELIVERY
GTM & 
implementation 
aligned to 
customer types
PAGE 16 

PAGE 18 
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Enterprise needs are complex in size, scope and scale. 
Standard off the shelf providers can’t meet their 
requirements. 
EROAD’s strength is in providing the stable core 
foundations large fleets need, with the additional 
innovations, integrations, and services required to 
deliver for enterprise. We do this using a mix of new 
builds, and third party integrations.
Build or Partner Rationale:
When enterprise customers require specific 
functionality, we will invest in development if:
•   It is core to our business
•   Meets needs across our customers
•   Aligns to our roadmap 
Doing so ensures our product development is consistent 
with our direction, has broad application and value, and 
increases scale.
For requests that are not considered to be core to us, we 
utilise our ever-expanding partner network. This allows 
us to deliver customer need while remaining focused on 
our strengths.
Full Stack: 
EROAD Enterprise
Our Strategy
PAGE 19
TELEMATICS FOR
FLEET MANAGERS
FLEET OPERATIONS 
PLATFORM FOR 
ENTERPRISE
CAPABILITIES EXPAND AND STRENGTHEN OVER TIME
FULL FLEET OPERATIONS
Cross fleet visibility of all physical operations
SYSTEM INTEGRATIONS
Customer’s internal systems integrations for cross 
functional data sharing
PARTNERSHIPS & INTEGRATIONS
Expanded capability via OEMs and 3rd party tools & system
DATA + AI
Convert data to knowledge for predictive intervention
TELEMATICS
Functional tools providing critical need while also collecting data

PAGE 20 
PAGE 21
TK PARTNERSHIP 
Through our direct partnership with refrigerated 
trailer manufacturer, Thermo King, we are 
connecting our cold-chain software directly to the 
customer’s refrigerated trailer and bypassing the 
need to purchase additional hardware.
Direct OEM integrations provide a more flexible 
solution that can reduce upfront costs and 
streamline deployment for customers. In turn, 
they increase our go to market opportunities as 
we explore additional channels to market. We are 
currently piloting with key customers across our cold 
chain segment and seeing positive results.
Sustainable Growth & 
Commercial Approach 
EROAD‘s commercial approach is aimed at 
driving sustainable growth by solving customer 
problems with innovative and reliable products. 
This year, we‘ve seen significant progress in 
expanding our enterprise customer base, with 
notable successes such as the rollout of 9,500+ 
units for Sysco and a new 3,000 unit deal with 
Programmed in Australia. Alongside our growth, 
we have maintained a retention rate of 94.8% 
globally as our customers continue to choose 
EROAD.
Through our commitment to fiscal responsibility, 
we executed a price increase across our products 
globally, implemented significant cost cutting 
measures, and achieved substantial operational 
efficiencies. Notably we have improved our FCF 
to the firm from -$29.9m in FY23 to $1.3m in 
FY24, an improvement of $31.2m.
To bolster product innovation, we align ourselves 
with partners and collaborators that deliver added 
services or benefits to customers. Two such 
examples announced in FY24 are with Microsoft 
for Generative AI, and our partnership with 
Thermo King for refrigerated trailers.
Across our product suite we have continued to 
innovate and deliver features, functionality, and 
tooling for our customers. 
As part of our rollout with Sysco, we released 
enhanced truck navigation; optimising routes 
with real-time traffic updates specific to heavy 
vehicles. In line with our strategy, when we invest 
in high value functionality for large enterprise, we 
benefit from rigorous testing with a live customer 
before taking it to market for all. 
As we continue to navigate the complexities of 
global markets, our commercial approach remains 
firmly rooted in leveraging these strengths—
enterprise growth, fiscal discipline, innovative 
partnerships, and global expansion—to ensure 
that EROAD grows in a way that is sustainable 
and value-creating for all stakeholders.
Goals & Aspirations
Sustainable and growing financial returns 
Innovative and reliable products to solve 
customer problems 
Maintain high integrity of data 
and security 
GLOBAL
$10m
Annualised 
cost savings
AVERAGE MONTHLY CASH BURN
$0.6m
Down from $3.1m 
in FY23
MAINTAINED
94.8%
Customer 
retention rate
AI DEVELOPMENTS 
EROAD is leveraging the power of generative AI to 
accelerate our innovation capabilities and deploying 
increased value to customers. Our collaboration with 
Microsoft accelerates our vision, enabling us to amplify 
our product suite with innovations that automate and 
optimise routine tasks, and provide deep data driven 
insights that improve decision-making and operational 
outcomes.
Within our own development teams, AI assists our 
software development processes, increasing the 
speed, accuracy, and consistency of code generation. 
This accelerates our product development cycle while 
also ensuring that we can quickly deliver high-quality, 
innovative features to our customers. 
Some recent AI developments at EROAD:
•	 Benchmarking for Electric Vehicle recommendations 
in the Sustainability Module 
•	 Predictive Shutdown in Reefer Trailers 
•	 AI Assistant for real time decision making 
(coming soon) 
PAGE 21

PAGE 22 
PAGE 23
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Trans-Tasman Growth
Programmed‘s Journey with EROAD
Programmed New Zealand has been on a journey 
to optimise fleet management and enhance safety. 
Since adopting EROAD‘s advanced technology 
across their fleet, the team saw benefits within 
6 months – reaching significant milestones that 
are revolutionising the way they operate. 
Impressed with the results achieved by their 
New Zealand business, Programmed Australia 
implemented EROAD across its entire fleet of 
3,000 vehicles and assets. 
BENEFITS DELIVERED:   
After six months, the team say they already 
began seeing real business benefits, including: 
Increased fleet efficiency   
Streamlined compliance management  
Reduced operating costs   
Improved safety   
Data analytics   
Detailed fuel consumption reporting 
 
PROGRAMMED NZ
550 fleet
PROGRAMMED AU
3000 fleet
PRODUCTS USED
Ehubo2 + EROAD Where 
asset tracking tags
It’s essential for businesses 
with substantial vehicle 
fleets. For us, it translates 
to enhanced fleet 
efficiency, streamlined 
compliance management, 
reduced operating costs, 
improved safety, data 
analytics, and detailed 
reporting.
Paula Thompson, Group Senior Fleet 
Coordinator at Programmed NZ 
PAGE 23
PAGE 22 

PAGE 24 
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
PAGE 25
PRODUCT QUALITY TESTING 
Consistent with our Do what’s right value, every 
layer of our value chain is subject to appropriate 
checks and balances to ensure what we bring to 
market is a consistently high standard. Each function 
adheres to requirements that are relevant to that 
business area, all designed to maintain our position 
as trustworthy to customers.
When it comes to our product quality, all hardware 
undergoes extreme levels of testing to verify we are 
shipping safe, functioning products. In addition to 
testing, we maintain strict monitoring and tracking 
databases which aid in product quality prediction, 
and allow us to respond swiftly in the event of a 
faulty product. Customers need to trust that when 
they buy from EROAD, they get a solution they can 
rely on.
-300+
individual tests each 
unit for CoreHub 
and Ehubo
100k+
individual data 
points tested
-40°C 
+120°C 
temperature stress tests
COST CUTTING HEROES
As we removed a further $10m from the budget in FY24, we 
recognised that to deliver long term benefits of cost cutting 
measures, a shift in the culture toward spend was needed. 
Cost Cutting Heroes is an initiative to acknowledge and 
celebrate individuals and teams who implement meaningful 
reductions in spend. In some cases, we not only removed 
cost, but made gains elsewhere via things like improved 
contract terms, and reductions in our emissions profile.  
One such example is through changes to our own supply 
chain in the manufacture and delivery of hardware. To date 
we have saved in excess of $600k annually through a mix of 
improved supplier management, freight profile refinements, 
and product packaging optimisations. In turn, by streamlining 
our packaging we reduced the freight bill and subsequently 
halved the emissions associated with the shipping of 15,000 
units and counting. 
$600k
SUPPLY CHAIN
RELIABLE AND SECURE DATA
Delivering reliable and high-performing technology platforms 
is a fundamental part of our business. We understand that 
the security and uninterrupted performance of our platforms 
are crucial for our customers. To this end, we implement 
rigorous security measures that protect against cyberattacks, 
data loss, and other potential disruptions, ensuring our 
systems remain secure, private, and continuously operational.
In collaboration with leading technology partners such as 
AWS, Microsoft, HERE Maps, and Vodafone, we ensure our 
frameworks and platform architectures adhere to the highest 
standards. This aligns us with best practices while leveraging 
the latest advancements in technology to improve our 
service offerings. Our focus areas include:
Operational Excellence 
Security 
Reliability 
Performance Efficiency 
Cost Optimisation 
Built on world-class cloud infrastructure, our platforms utilise 
a globally distributed network of data centres with isolated 
availability zones and regional redundancy, designed to 
deliver low latency, high resilience, and scalable solutions.
From the outset, we incorporate stringent security 
measures, starting from the design phase and extending 
through operational controls. We undertake annual third-
party penetration testing to validate our defences and 
use a privacy impact assessment tool to further safeguard 
user data.
We regularly refine and strengthen IT and cybersecurity 
policies to make sure our platforms are safeguarded against 
evolving threats. Comprehensive training programmes 
equip our employees with the knowledge to understand and 
mitigate privacy risks and security threats effectively.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT 
TESTING PROCESS
99.92%
System Uptime
on all platforms
MyEROAD 99.94%
EROAD 360 99.90%
Scoping
Design
Design Validation Testing: 
Electrical & Mechanical
Test 
Results 
analysis
Redesign/
Retest
Approval
PAGE 24 

EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Goals & Aspirations
Healthier, safer & more sustainable 
communities 
Sensible, long term cost effective 
regulatory solutions 
Sustainable and efficient supply chain and 
transportation network 
Our Customers & 
Communities  
We take a dual lensed view to our impact at 
EROAD; what we are directly responsible for, 
and how the products we make influence the 
outcomes of our customers. Our customers are 
integral to the communities they serve, providing 
essential services such as transport, construction, 
food, medical, logistics, and maintenance. 
Accordingly, we take a considered approach 
to how we help our customers, and how their 
operations impact communities. Owing to a 
combination of regulatory requirements and 
societal pressures, customers are increasingly 
focused on delivering meaningful improvements 
in their wider sustainability targets. This aligns 
with our suite of products designed to support:
165
Enterprise 
Customers
1.2b
Taxable Miles 
Reported in 
North America
$806m
RUC 
Collected⁴ 
PAGE 26 
SAFER DRIVER 
BEHAVIOUR
REDUCTION 
OF WASTE 
IN OPERATIONS
EFFICIENT TRAFFIC 
AND ROAD 
MANAGEMENT
SMART TEMPERATURE 
CONTROL
FAIR AND SIMPLIFIED 
FUNDING OF 
INFRASTRUCTURE
Safer driver behaviour through fleet 
management solutions that minimise road 
incidents and enhance driver training. 
Smart temperature control for food in transit, 
ensuring quality standards and compliance with 
health regulations. 
Efficient traffic and road management via 
intelligent routing that reduces congestion and 
environmental impact. 
Fair and simplified funding of infrastructure 
through usage-based charges and taxes, 
reflecting a more equitable system for road 
funding. 
Reduction of waste in operations, contributing to 
environmental sustainability. 
In addition to our products, EROAD actively 
supports our customers and communities through 
educational initiatives, industry engagement, 
and advocacy. Events like the annual Fleet Day 
provide a platform for knowledge sharing and 
networking, while our sponsorship of the ARC 
initiative showcases our dedication to advancing 
road safety and infrastructure development.
⁴ Including GST and associated fees.

PAGE 28 
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024

414k
Triggered events 
captured on video
800+
Industry 
stakeholders
50+
Industry
partners
BUILDING A COMMUNITY: FLEET DAY, NZ 
With more than 800 industry members in attendance, our 
annual Fleet Day has grown to be a truly important event in 
the industry calendar. 
In line with our purpose, the themes are focused on safety, 
efficiency and sustainability. Speakers and topics are carefully 
curated to be uplifting, informative, and thought provoking to 
ensure everyone gets the most out of the experience.
Highlights of this year include a keynote from ex All Blacks 
Coach Sir Graham Henry, and our own customer Josh 
Hedley of Downer NZ joined by Brian Yanko of NZ Police 
discussing the value of partnerships and relationships in Fleet 
Management.
Importantly, Fleet Day serves as more than just a networking 
opportunity; it‘s a forum for us to strengthen relationships 
with our customers and partners while also facilitating 
connections between them. It provides a platform to build 
valuable relationships, share best practices, and collectively 
contribute to advancing industry‘s goals of safety, efficiency, 
and sustainability.
The event delivered far 
more than I expected. Really 
enjoyed the whole day. 
Engaging, interactive and 
informative.
Compared to auto events in 
NZ and overseas, FLEET DAY 
has to be one of the best.
It’s NZ’s equivalent of AFMA. 
It’s the must-attend fleet 
management event.
Fleet Day attendees
“EROAD LIVES” AT AUSTRALIAN 
RALLY CHAMPIONSHIP  
Now in our fourth year as a named supporter of ARC, 
we levelled up our commitment in FY24 with the 
addition of Clarity Solo Dashcams providing increased 
safety and assisting with judicial procedures. 
On competition weekends, rally cars typically drive 
75% of their mileage on public roads between the 
Service Park and the stages. Our Clarity Solo tracks 
the competitor’s driving behaviour and speed limit 
adherence on public roads. 
The harsh off-road racing conditions provide the 
ultimate test of the quality, stability and reliability of 
our hardware as it withstands intense g-force, dust, 
and temperatures. We are proud to support the ARC 
in a way that is true to our purpose and increases 
safety within the community.
DASHCAM & SAFETY
Enhancing road safety is crucial, both for our customers 
and the wider community. Our technologies play a vital 
role in addressing critical driver safety concerns that lead 
to road incidents and crashes.
In FY24, our dashcam data revealed that 
56.2% of tagged dashcam events 
recorded critical safety concerns 
that are widely recognised as leading contributors 
to road accidents: 
•	 Mobile Phone Usage
Distraction from mobile phone use while driving is a 
significant risk factor for accidents. Our systems help 
identify and alert fleet managers to such behaviour, 
allowing for timely interventions. 
•	 Fatigue
Driver fatigue is another critical safety issue, particularly 
for long-haul operations. Our solutions monitor 
patterns that may indicate fatigue, enabling proactive 
management of drivers’ schedules and rest periods. 
•	 No Seatbelt Usage
Our dashcams effectively detect and record instances 
of non-compliance with seatbelt usage, a simple yet 
crucial measure that significantly reduces the risk of 
injury in accidents.
PAGE 29

PAGE 30 
PAGE 31
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
EROAD supporting our 
local communities 
Aligned with our dedication to fostering 
thriving communities, everyone at EROAD 
is offered one paid day to volunteer with 
a charity or organisation in their local 
community. In many cases we find teams 
come together to support a cause as a 
group and increase the impact they have.
PLANTING DAYS
EROAD partnered with Restore Hibiscus Bays to organise 
a volunteer planting day in North Auckland at Ōkoromai-
Clansman Reserve. The team of 11 dug in to remove invasive 
weeds from native bush and collect litter. 
WALK FOR STARSHIP 
Inspired by their Australian counterparts, the Marketing team 
in New Zealand organised a coastal walk of their own to raise 
money for NZ’s childrens hospital, Starship. They opened up 
the opportunity to all Auckland based staff to join them as they 
trekked along the coast of the North Shore, a total of 32km’s from 
Long Bay to Takapuna and return.
$1,510
Raised for Starship 
Children Hospital
50km
Walked between
AU & NZ teams
AUCKLAND CITY MISSION 
The Auckland City Mission requires volunteers all year round, and 
we had an eager group of EROADers that donated their time to 
help out. They spent the day packing food parcels for some of our 
most vulnerable people in the community.
ALEX’S LEMONADE STAND WALK (AU) 
The Australian team used their volunteer day to raise funds and 
awareness for Alex’s Lemonade Stand, a charity supporting 
childhood cancer, their families and cancer research. The team 
gathered together to walk Sydney’s Royal Coastal walk in a 
single day, which was 28km long.
PAGE 31

PAGE 33
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Our Environment 
Goals & Aspirations
Emissions Reduction and the road 
to Net Zero for Customers 
Divert waste from landfill 
Innovative environmentally 
conscious culture 
At EROAD, we integrate sustainability into 
our core operations and product design to 
mitigate environmental impact while driving 
business efficiency. This commitment is evident 
in our targeted efforts to reduce fuel use, 
enhance waste management, and improve the 
recyclability of our products. 
Over the past year, we have developed specific 
technologies and processes that conserve 
resources and reduce emissions for us, and our 
customers. Some of these initiatives are outlined 
here and demonstrate our progress and ongoing 
commitment to environmental stewardship. 
DELIVERING ENVIRONMENTAL 
SUSTAINABILITY 
Across our customer base, the regulatory landscape is 
rapidly evolving to impose stricter emissions standards 
and sustainability benchmarks. In the U.S., federal and 
state mandates, such as the Advanced Clean Trucks Rule in 
California, require fleets to reduce emissions and transition 
to zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs). Australia and New Zealand 
also promote similar policies aimed at reducing carbon 
footprints, such as the Climate Change Response (Carbon 
Zero) Amendment Act 2019 in New Zealand and incentives for 
electric vehicle (EV) adoption in Australia. 
Additionally, consumers and investors are exerting 
considerable pressure on companies to demonstrate 
environmental responsibility. EROAD is enhancing our product 
suite with features and functionality that enable companies to 
meet both regulatory measures and stakeholder expectations 
with tools and insights aimed at emissions reduction and 
reporting ability for fleets. 
FY24
tCO2e
FY23
tCO2e
FY24 vs FY23 
tCO2e
Scope 1 140.77
167.63
16%
Scope 2 89.30
82.11
9%
SCOPE 2 
INDIRECT EMISSIONS FROM 
IMPORTED ENERGY
SCOPE 1 
DIRECT EMISSIONS 
AND REMOVALS
SCOPE 3 
INDIRECT EMISSIONS OF THE 
CHAIN SUPPLY OR SERVICE
PAGE 33
PAGE 32 

PAGE 35
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
SUSTAINABILITY MODULE IN MYEROAD  
Leveraging connected fleet data to offer comprehensive 
emissions reporting and actionable insights, assisting 
businesses in their pursuit of sustainability. The MyEROAD 
Sustainability Module equips fleet operators with critical 
emissions data and empowers them with the tools 
to implement effective and measurable sustainability 
strategies. By providing a clear picture of both current 
performance and future opportunities, EROAD is helping 
businesses reduce their environmental footprint while 
enhancing operational efficiency.
At a glance
Comprehensive Emissions Reporting View emissions 
data for an entire fleet, specific vehicle groups, or individual 
vehicles, enabling managers to identify particular areas or 
vehicles that require interventions.
Advanced Analytics Sort vehicles by various metrics and 
receive AI-driven recommendations tailored to vehicle type, 
usage patterns, and emissions intensity. This ensures that 
each decision is informed by accurate, data-driven insights.
Cost Savings Calculate the potential cost savings from 
reduced emissions, offering a clear financial incentive for 
adopting more sustainable practices.
Customisable With adjustable settings for fuel prices and 
idling parameters, businesses can fine-tune the system to 
reflect their specific operations for more precise data and 
recommendations.
Emissions Predictions By analysing current trends and 
usage patterns, the module offers predictions on future 
emissions intensity, helping businesses plan and implement 
proactive strategies.
Benchmarking Tools New to the industry, the 
benchmarking feature allows companies to compare their 
emissions performance against similar fleets, providing a 
broader context for evaluating their environmental impact.
GOVERNANCE MODEL FOR 
SUSTAINABILITY  
EROAD maintains a comprehensive Sustainability Policy, 
which focuses on environmental, social, and governance 
concerns. Our Board oversees climate responsibilities and 
delegates specific tasks to the management team, who 
consistently report on our progress. Sustainability is integral 
to our decision-making and aligns closely with our operational 
strategy. 
We actively manage both the risks and opportunities 
presented by climate change through our Sustainability 
Committee, who meet monthly to discuss climate issues and 
develop practical strategies to achieve our sustainability goals. 
This focused approach ensures that EROAD is well-prepared 
to navigate the changing climate landscape and successfully 
meet our objectives. 
Board of Directors
FRAC
All EROADers
Executive 
Team
Sustainability
Committee
With reported greenhouse gas emissions of 
17%, the New Zealand government has a goal to 
reduce transport emissions by 41% by 2035, with 
the ultimate goal of Net Zero Emissions by 2050 
across the board.
In September, in partnership with the Energy 
Efficiency and Conservation Authority 
(EECA), EROAD released 2 new tools aimed at 
empowering fleets to reduce their emissions.
Fuel Consumption
2,747 L
8.1%
Since last period
Replacement candidacy
Fuel Economy
Estimated Emissions
7,002 kg
0.3%
Since last period
Emissions Intensity
26.297 kg CO2-e/100km
2.9%
Since last period
Fuel Emissions
Petrol 10K (75.65%)
Diesel 3.3K (24.35%)
Electric 0 (0.00%)
Average
Good
Excellent
EV Candidates
Good
Not suitable
Excellent
Fuel economy 
6.6L / 100km
Benchmark
8.5L / 100km
Potential Fuel Savings
1,918 L
Potential CO2-e Savings
9,733 kg
Reports available
Overview 
Dashboard
Displays total emissions, 
comparative analytics, and 
summarises key fleet efficiency 
insights and recommended 
actions— all ready to be 
presented to stakeholders 
without the need for additional 
data processing. 
Detailed Emissions and  
Fuel Economy Reports
These reports offer deep 
dives into emissions trends, 
fuel usage, and potential 
savings, highlighting areas for 
improvement and the impact of 
practices like unproductive idling. 
Vehicle Replacement  
Suitability Report
This tool helps identify which 
vehicles could be replaced with 
low or zero-emission models, 
estimating potential fuel and 
emissions savings. 
Idling and Harsh  
Driving Reports
These reports provide  
insights into idling times  
and harsh driving behaviours, 
pinpointing opportunities for 
driver coaching to reduce 
emissions and improve safety.
PAGE 35
PAGE 34 
999
Accounts to date exceeding 
launch goal by 333%
102%
increase of EV’s 
registered in fleets YoY
240%
increase in distance 
travelled by EV’s
Spotlight 
on Product

PAGE 36 
PAGE 37
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
PUBLIC FACING 
EMISSIONS CALCULATOR 
Powered by EROAD’s AI technology and data monitored 
from over 100,000 connected vehicles and assets, the EROAD 
Emissions Calculator provides users with an overview of their 
fleet’s emissions profile, and offers suggestions for emissions 
reduction, alongside potential savings. The calculator is 
offered free as a web tool reflecting our broader commitment 
to reducing emissions in the community.
EV PROMOTION
•	 Enable customers to recommend EVs as the first 
booking option 
•	 We are currently building a solution that estimates a users 
trip distance, then promotes the most suitable journey/
vehicle type –  ebike, public transport, short range EV, long 
range EV, or petrol/diesel.
CASE STUDY: 
MĀTANGA PROJECTS  
Mātanga Projects approached EROAD to help them 
manage their fleet safely, efficiently, and sustainably. 
“We’re trying to get our technology in place early 
so we can be ahead of the game,” states Brad 
McKenzie, Director of Mātanga Projects. 
Managing civil projects across different terrains 
and customer sites, the team need vehicles and 
technology they can rely on. When Mātanga Projects 
chose EROAD as their fleet management partner, 
Brad says there were four key things they needed, 
which EROAD delivered on: 
•	 Tracking the fleet’s carbon emission footprint  
•	 Tracking where vehicles are for safety reasons 
•	 Calculating accurate mileage for invoicing 
purposes, and 
•	 Improving driver behaviour 
By monitoring their fleet with EROAD, Mātanga 
Projects are able to track and measure their fleet 
emissions easily through EROAD’s Sustainability 
Module. The tool is helping them to understand their 
fleet’s total emissions and emissions intensity, and 
how they stack up against others in their industry. 
28%
emissions reduction within 
6 months of using EROAD
SUSTAINABILITY ENHANCEMENTS 
FOR POOL BOOKING - SUSTAINABILITY 
DASHBOARD 
•	 Enabling customers to understand how their electrification 
journey compares to other organisations – including a 
Electrifcation Leaderboard Ranking 
•	 Advising customers how close they are to government 
goals of 30% electrification 
•	 Within organisation we help branches understand who 
leads in both EV adoption and EV utilisation – and 
identifies where EVs are not being taken on journeys that 
are particularly suitable (Low KM ones)
11,230kg
Weight recycled
3,220kg
Green House Gas 
Emissions Reduced
E-WASTE & RECYCLING  
In line with our commitment to sustainable lifecycle 
management, we are intensifying our focus on the 
environmental impact of our hardware devices, from their 
manufacture through to end-of-life. While these efforts 
continue to evolve, our e-waste program for our New Zealand 
business has achieved significant milestones. Currently, 100% 
of returned devices, are directed to recycling through our 
partnership with Echo Tech. 
Through this initiative, every device we retrieve is processed 
responsibly, minimising environmental impact and reinforcing 
our dedication to sustainable practices. Looking forward, 
we are exploring options for similar solutions in both our 
Australian and North American markets.
PAGE 36 

PAGE 38 
PAGE 39
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Climate Related Disclosures
AREA
ACTION
FY23
FY24
FY25+
Governance 
Review and confirm governance and 
management roles and responsibilities 
DONE
DONE
Set-up Sustainability Committee for 
operational oversight 
DONE
Educating the business on climate-related 
areas 
ONGOING
ONGOING
Consider system changes to monitor our 
performance against targets on a more 
regular basis 
ONGOING
Consider how climate-related matters 
including targets and included into 
remuneration policies 
ONGOING
ONGOING
Strategy 
Define sustainability strategy 
DONE
DONE
ONGOING
Develop climate-related risks and 
opportunities register
DONE
Develop and perform climate-related 
scenario analysis
DONE
Development of transition plan
ONGOING
Identify anticipated financial impacts of 
climate-related risks and opportunities
ONGOING
AREA
ACTION
FY23
FY24
FY25+
Risk
Management 
Embed climate-related risks and 
opportunities into our risk framework 
DONE
ONGOING
Document processes for identifying 
climate-related risks and the assessment 
and management of those risks  
DONE
Metrics and 
Targets  
Measure and set Scope 1, 2 and selected 
Scope 3 GHG emissions base year 
DONE
Maintain Toitu carbonreduce certification 
DONE
DONE
ONGOING
Set initial reduction targets for Scope 1 and 
2 GHG emissions 
DONE
DONE
Set interim and longer-term targets for 
Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions  
DONE
ONGOING
Confirm commitment to Net Zero target for 
2050 
DONE
ONGOING
Set reduction targets for selected Scope 3 
emission categories 
ONGOING
Measure and set reduction targets across 
remaining Scope 3 categories 
ONGOING
Reduce Scope 1, 2 and 3 measured 
emissions in line with science-aligned 
targets 
ONGOING
Introduction of the Sustainability Module in 
myEROAD for customer use 
DONE
ONGOING
Explore how we can influence our 
customer’s GHG emissions from use 
of our product 
ONGOING
ONGOING
PAGE 39
PAGE 38 
During FY24, EROAD took proactive steps towards ensuring transparency and accountability in our 
reporting practices by collaborating with PwC for the requirements of mandatory climate-related 
disclosures implemented for FY24. In doing so, we assessed the evolving regulatory landscape and 
best practices for climate-related reporting, positioning us to meet our obligations effectively.  
Our Climate Related Disclosures report will provide stakeholders with comprehensive and accurate 
information regarding our climate-related risks and opportunities. EROAD reaffirms its dedication 
to sustainability, responsible corporate governance, and transparency in our operations. Our Climate 
Related Disclosures will outline progress to date and will be available at https://eroadglobal.com/
investors by 31 July 2024.
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024

PAGE 41
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Goals & Aspirations
Foster a diverse and inclusive culture
Be a desirable place to work
Develop strong, empowered leaders
Our People 
We understand that our success is driven by 
our people, and are dedicated to fostering 
an environment where all employees feel 
valued and have opportunities for personal 
and professional growth. By prioritising 
development and engagement, we aim to 
ensure that every team member has the 
opportunity to thrive.
True to living our values, a key component 
of our people strategy is grounded in listen 
to learn – ensuring we provide opportunities 
for people to feel heard. Through channels 
such as our regular employee engagement 
surveys, EROADers have a regular 
touchpoint to influence change through 
voicing concerns. It is thanks to feedback 
like this we are able to develop targeted 
programmes such as the Leadership 
Programme for team leads in FY24.
Initiatives like leadership development, 
gender pay equity, and comprehensive 
awards and recognition programs 
demonstrate our dedication to nurturing 
an inclusive and engaged culture. Our 
summer internships and regular employee 
engagement surveys help us stay 
connected with our employees‘ aspirations 
and feedback and guide our continuous 
improvement.
We do what’s right
We put customers at the heart 
of what we do.
We look after our people and put 
their safety & wellbeing first.
We focus on delivering quality 
outcomes.
We play as a team
We all play for the same team and 
that includes our customers and 
partners.
We value and respect diverse 
opinions and we work together to 
overcome challenges.
We embrace our differences and 
celebrate what makes us unique.
We learn & grow
We listen to learn.
We own and learn from mistakes, 
choosing to hold a growth mindset.
We believe that curiosity fuels 
successful innovation.
We get it done
We do what we say we will.
We prioritise to deliver the most 
important outcomes.
We take ownership and work 
together to get to a solution..
PAGE 41
PAGE 40 

PAGE 42 
PAGE 43
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Rewards & Recognition 
Training and Development 
Feeling appreciated and connected is crucial to 
fostering a positive workplace culture. Our reward and 
recognition initiatives, including the online Bonusly 
platform and the quarterly EROAD Awards program, are 
designed to encourage peer-to-peer appreciation and 
celebrate team achievements.
DEVELOPING OUR LEADERS 
97% of leaders completed the newly launched Leadership 
Essentials Programme. The 11 modules cover topics like 
recruitment, managing difficult conversations, giving effective 
feedback, leading through change, finance management, and 
performance management – all essential skills for any leader.  
750+ 
years of collective 
knowledge 
25%
of EROADers 
received awards
This year, we also introduced Long Service Awards 
to acknowledge the many EROADers who have 
continued employment for 5 or more years. It was 
an opportunity to celebrate their contributions, 
learn more about their stories, and thank them for 
choosing EROAD.
FY24 COURSES
	»
Introduced Meet the SME Elearning Courses 
	»
Added 25 Project Management elearning modules to 
Open Sesame 
	»
Introduced AWS learning: AWS Cloud Practitioner 
Essentials & AWS Skills Builder  
	»
Redelivered mandatory courses 
•	 Privacy at EROAD 
•	 Working at a listed company 
•	 Data Privacy (including Cyber Security) 
•	 Health and Safety 
•	 MYEROAD product training 
IN THE NUMBERS
(as at 31 December 2023)
CAREER DEVELOPMENT 
93%
development plans 
completed globally 
(up from 71% FY23)  
13%
Increase in employee score 
“I feel that I‘m growing 
professionally” 
 
20 years 2 
15 years 3 
10 years 22 
5 years    89 
ATTRACTING NEW TALENT 
Attracting new talent is a priority at EROAD. We use several 
initiatives to encourage EROAD as a top choice of employer to 
attract a variety of future staff. 
SCHOLARSHIP 
EROAD’s 2024 Scholarship Award recipient, Zach Celona. 
Zach is in his second year at University of Auckland studying a 
Bachelor of Engineering majoring in software engineering. 
Our scholarship selection panel were impressed with his 
academic achievements, the glowing recommendations from 
his lecturers and his community work. 
(Announced November 2023) 
200
applicants  
4
graduates  
10
interns  
40%
60%
50%
50%
SUMMER INTERNS 
2024 GRADUATES
MEET CAITLIN FISHER 
Software Engineer, Provisioning Team 
From intern to leader, and the 
importance of a bright green blazer. 
The Summer Intern programme of 2021-2022 was set 
to be a vibrant and social experience working at EROAD 
HQ; shared lunches, stand ups, mixing with different 
teams, and of course, all the celebrations for the merger 
with Coretex! Sadly, the last wave of COVID lockdowns 
sent everyone home instead. 
Thankfully, this didn’t deter Caitlin, who embraced the 
opportunity, appreciated the way everyone adapted, and 
felt the effort and kindness from her team, her mentor 
and buddy even from a distance.
“You could see how close the team was, 
and the effort they put in to keep that 
culture, which is something that was 
really important for me—to not just learn 
and get better at what I do, but also have 
fun and actually enjoy what I do.” 
After completing her studies and a stint of travelling, 
Caitlin returned to EROAD as a graduate, and is a pivotal 
member of the provisioning team, responsible for 
improvements for the vehicle install process.
Caitlin’s commitment and leadership potential were 
evident from day one, where she stood out in the 
interview process for being the only one in bright green 
against 20-30 in shades of black, and volunteering to 
go first in the ice breaker activities. What really stands 
out about this, though, is they were intentional decisions 
Caitlin made to help her secure her internship. And while 
it no doubt helped, it’s the work she’s done since that 
makes her memorable.
Opting for the management career path, Caitlin has 
stepped up as Scrum Master for her team and enjoys 
making improvements to workflow, communication, and 
shared learning.
PAGE 43
PAGE 42 

PAGE 44 
PAGE 45
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Diversity & Equality 
35
countries EROADers are from
increase from 29 in FY23
41%
of EROAD’s Senior 
Leadership Team is female
higher than industry average 
+48
eNPS for EROAD‘s 
efforts to support 
diversity and inclusion
(+7 points ahead of the tech 
industry benchmark)
„The company respects 
and values differences 
in gender, ethnicity, disability, 
and socio-economic status, 
which creates a welcoming and 
inclusive work environment.“
Staff comment, 
eNPS Survey March 2024
As part of our ongoing commitment to 
create a diverse and inclusive workplace, 
a new Diversity and Inclusion strategy 
aimed at reducing the gender pay gap was 
approved by the board and will be adopted 
in FY25.  
It includes initiatives such as: 
40:40:20 gender ratio amongst short 
listed job applicants by 2026 
Developing diversity initiatives 
that support progression of women into 
leadership positions 
Gender neutral job descriptions 
Education about gender bias, 
discrimination and unconscious bias
Health, Safety & Wellness
WISH COMMITTEE
WISH‘ stands for Wellbeing, Inclusion, Social, and 
Health & Safety. It‘s an intiative run by a group 
of volunteers within EROAD who are passionate 
about making our workplace the best it can be.  
In practice it‘s a series of global and local events 
that bring these areas to life.
BEING WELL PORTAL
In association with Southern 
Cross Health Insurance, all 
EROADers have access to the 
BeingWell Portal. It is a hub full 
of resources centred around 
four main topics: Sleeping Well, 
Moving Well, Eating Well and 
Thinking Well.
ROAD SAFETY WEEK
During our annual Road Safety 
Week presentation, we were joined 
by Fit for Duty (Sleep research and 
support) and Brake – The Road 
Safety Charity, in which they both 
addressed their concerns around 
driver safety and the impact of 
fatigue. This is a global event we 
host annually and is a significant 
safety event.
WALKATHON
Our much anticipated and 
highly participated wellbeing 
event is the annual Walkathon. 
90 staff members completed a 
total of 31.3 million steps over 
six weeks. That’s 21,516 km’s!
MOVEMBER
A month long global campaign 
bringing awareness to men’s 
physical health, mental health, 
prostate & testicular cancer. 12 
men took on the challenge of 
growing a moustache through 
out the month of November 
and raised money for the 
Movember charity.
PINK SHIRT DAY
Pink Shirt Day is an opportunity 
to promote inclusion, diversity, 
and kindness to all. Staff wore 
pink shirts across the business 
in support of anti-bullying in 
schools, in the community and 
in workplaces.
PAGE 44 

PAGE 46 
PAGE 47
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Board
Chair, Independent Director,
Auckland
Appointed: March 2019, 
Appointed Chair: July 2023 
Board Committees: 
Nominations, Finance, Risk and 
Audit, People & Culture
Susan is a professional director with more 
than 25 years Board/Chair experience 
in NZX/ASX listed companies, private 
companies, government entities and 
not for profits. With a pharmaceutical 
and management background and MBA 
(London Business School) she has worked 
in a range of consulting and management 
positions throughout New Zealand and 
internationally. Susan is an appointed 
Officer of New Zealand Order of Merit 
(services to governance) and was awarded 
Chartered Fellow status by the Council of 
the Institute of Directors.
Located in Pennsylvania, Barry brings 
considerable transport knowledge of 
the North American market as well as 
global automated and connected vehicle 
expertise. He held a position of Vice 
President at Econolite and he has also held 
a number of leadership positions within the 
transport industry and advised Singapore’s 
Ministry of Transportation on their Highly 
Automated Vehicle Programme. In addition, 
Barry reviewed work undertaken by the 
Transportation Research Board and created 
patent-approved technology used in Public 
Safety Networks. He holds a Bachelor of 
Science (Environmental Biology). 
Based in Boston, Sara brings extensive 
experience in fast-growing software 
companies, logistics, transportation, large 
scale product implementation, and sales. 
She has business experience in North 
America, Europe, Southeast Asia, Australia, 
and NZ. Sara served as the Chief Solutions 
Officer and executive board member of 
Quintiq and is a director of North American 
company Spiro, a customer relationship 
management and sales enablement 
company, and is the co-founder and 
director of Activote, a non-partisan 
application enabling voting in North 
America. 
Independent Director 
Pennsylvania 
Appointed: January 2020 
Board Committees: 
Technology (Chair), Nominations 
Independent Director 
Massachusetts
Appointed: April 2022 
Board Committees: 
People & Culture (Chair), 
Nominations, Technology
Leadership
SUSAN 
PATERSON
BARRY 
EINSIG  
SARA 
GIFFORD   
David is a professional director, investor 
and former executive in the banking and 
finance sector with extensive business 
management, leadership and governance 
experience. Throughout his executive 
career he led large teams delivering 
complex solutions for large enterprise 
customers across a wide range of industry 
sectors in Asia, Australia and New Zealand 
and the Middle East. David has considerable 
experience leading change programmes, 
digital transformation strategies, building 
positions of market leadership and working 
with regulators. He has been awarded 
fellowships by the Chartered Accountants 
Australia and New Zealand (CA ANZ) and 
the Institute of Finance Professionals in 
New Zealand (INFINZ). 
Based in California, Cameron has deep 
experience in Board governance as well 
as an extensive executive management 
career as a Chief Financial Officer and 
Chief Operating Officer in high-growth 
companies. In these roles, she has driven 
strategic and scalable growth and has led 
numerous successful capital raises, M&A 
and IPO processes across a wide range of 
industries. She is currently Chief Financial 
Officer at Weights & Biases, an enterprise 
software company, and is a Director at 
Copper Cow Coffee, a sustainably sourced 
coffee producer. Cameron is a member of 
EROAD’s Finance, Risk & Audit Committee. 
Selwyn brings more than 40 years’ 
experience in electronics supply chains, 
enterprise level network security and 
telematics in Asia, Australia, NZ, North 
America and Europe. He has extensive 
experience in international sales, marketing, 
strategic planning and supply chain 
management in small start-ups to multi-
billion-dollar corporations. He was the 
founder and CEO of Coretex before the 
merger with EROAD and the previous 
co-founder, CEO and Chairman of Endace 
Ltd. In 2008 Selwyn was recognised as a 
‘Flying Kiwi’ by the New Zealand Hi Tech 
Association. 
Independent Director
Auckland
Appointed: July 2023 
Board Committees: 
Finance, Risk and Audit (Chair), 
Nominations, People & Culture
Independent Director
California
Appointed: March 2024 
Board Committees: 
Finance, Risk and Audit, 
Nominations
Non-Executive Director
Auckland
Appointed: December 2021 
Board Committees: 
Finance, Risk and Audit, 
Nominations, Technology
DAVID 
GREEN   
CAMERON 
KINLOCH    
SELWYN 
PELLETT     

PAGE 48 
PAGE 49
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Executive Team
Leadership
DAVID 
KENNESON
CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE 
OFFICER
MARGARET 
WARRINGTON
CHIEF FINANCIAL 
OFFICER
SHELLEY 
PRENTICE
CHIEF PEOPLE 
OFFICER
AARON 
LATIMER
CHIEF OPERATING 
OFFICER 
MARK 
HEINE
CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE 
OFFICER
DUANNE
O‘BRIEN
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY 
OFFICER⁶
⁵ Joined April 2024
⁶ Starting June 2024
KONRAD 
STEMPNIAK
EGM SALES & 
MARKETING ANZ
MARK 
DAVIDSON
EVP SALES & 
MARKETING⁵ 
AKINYEMI 
KOYI
PRESIDENT PRODUCT 
& STRATEGY
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
JEREMY 
WILTON
EVP PRODUCT & 
ENGINEERING-DEVICES

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the year ended 31 March 2024	
	
	
	
	
	
	
2024
2023
Notes
$M's
$M’s
Revenue
2
182.0
174.9
Operating expenses
5
(128.7)
(129.7)
Earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and 
amortisation
53.3
45.2
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
10
(23.2)
(17.2)
Amortisation of intangible assets
11
(19.0)
(17.9)
Amortisation of contract and customer aquisition assets
3
(10.3)
(8.4)
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT)
0.8
1.7
Finance expense
(8.5)
(7.1)
Finance income
(0.7)
0.3
Net financing costs
14
(7.8)
(6.8)
Loss before tax
(7.0)
(5.1)
Income tax benefit
20
6.7
2.1
Loss after tax for the year attributable to the shareholders
(0.3)
(3.0)
Other comprehensive income
Items that may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss:
Cash flow hedges
(0.6)
0.4
Currency translation differences
3.7
2.3
3.1
2.7
Total comprehensive loss for the year
2.8
(0.3)
Loss per share - Basic (cents) 
15
(0.25)
2.69
Loss per share - Diluted (cents) 
15
(0.25)
2.68
The above Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the 
accompanying notes.	
	
	
	
	
	
EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 50 
PAGE 51
Financial 
Statements

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 52 
PAGE 53
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
As at 31 March 2024
 2024 
2023
Notes
$M's
$M’s
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
7
14.5
8.1
Restricted bank accounts
7
17.8
11.6
Trade and other receivables
8
33.2
34.4
Contract fulfilment costs
3
5.8
5.3
Costs to obtain contracts
3
2.4
2.3
Total Current Assets
73.7
61.7
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
10
88.8
77.8
Intangible assets
11
244.4
242.1
Derivative financial asset
18
-
0.2
Contract fulfilment costs
3
6.2
4.0
Costs to obtain contracts
3
2.7
1.8
Deferred tax assets
21
17.7
15.2
Total Non-Current Assets
359.8
341.1
Total Assets
433.5
402.8
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (continued)
As at 31 March 2024
 2024 
2023
Notes
$M's
$M’s
Current liabilities
Borrowings
13
2.5
1.4
Trade payables and accruals
9
30.3
23.0
Payables to transport agencies
7
17.8
11.9
Contract liabilities
4
10.9
7.4
Lease liabilities
12
1.2
1.7
Employee entitlements
4.1
3.7
Derivative financial liabilities
18
0.3
-
Total Current Liabilities
67.1
49.1
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
13
34.1
69.2
Contract liabilities
4
12.7
12.0
Lease liabilities
12
5.1
5.8
Derivative financial liabilities
18
0.1
-
Deferred tax liabilities
21
11.4
17.9
Total non-current liabilities
63.4
104.9
Total Liabilities
130.5
154.0
Net Assets
303.0
248.8
Equity
Share Capital
15
353.5
305.7
Share capital premium/discount
(19.9)
(19.9)
Other reserves
2.1
(1.0)
Accumulated losses
(32.7)
(36.0)
Total Shareholders' Equity
303.0
248.8
The above Consolidated Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.		
Chair of the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee, 23 May 24
Chair, 23 May 24

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 54 
PAGE 55
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
For the year ended 31 March 2024
Consolidated
Share 
Capital 
Share 
Premium / 
Discount
Accumulated 
losses
Translation 
Reserve
Hedging 
Reserve
Total
Notes
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
Balance as at 1 April 2022
293.3
(6.5)
(35.4)
(3.5)
(0.2)
247.7
Loss for the year
-
-
(3.0)
-
-
(3.0)
Other comprehensive loss
-
-
-
2.3
0.4
2.7
Total comprehensive loss
-
-
(3.0)
2.3
0.4
(0.3)
Transactions with owners 
of the Company
Equity settled share-based 
payments
16
1.4
-
(1.3)
-
-
0.1
Share capital issued relating to 
business combination
11.0
(9.7)
-
-
-
1.3
Contingent shares forfeited 
reclassification
-
(3.7)
3.7
-
-
-
Balance as at 31 March 2023
305.7
(19.9)
(36.0)
(1.2)
0.2
248.8
Balance as at 1 April 2023
305.7
(19.9)
(36.0)
(1.2)
0.2
248.8
Loss for the year
-
-
(0.3)
-
-
(0.3)
Other comprehensive income
-
-
-
3.7
(0.6)
3.1
Total comprehensive income/
(loss)
-
-
(0.3)
3.7
(0.6)
2.8
Transactions with owners 
of the Company
Equity settled share-based 
payments
16
1.0
-
3.6
-
-
4.6
Share capital issued - net of costs
15
46.8
-
-
-
-
46.8
Balance at 31 March 2024
353.5
(19.9)
(32.7)
2.5
(0.4)
303.0
The above Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.	
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the year ended 31 March 2024
 2024 
2023
Notes
$M’s
$M’s
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash received from customers
186.3
165.2
Payments to suppliers and employees
(117.0)
(128.9)
Payments for contract fulfilment assets
3
(10.0)
(7.6)
Interest received
0.7
0.3
Interest paid
(6.5)
(4.9)
Tax (paid)/received
(0.6)
-
Net cash inflow from operating activities
52.9
24.1
Cash flows from investing activities
Payments for investment in property, plant & equipment
10
(32.2)
(27.5)
Payments for investment in intangible assets
11
(21.3)
(28.2)
Payments for investment in costs to obtain contracts
3
(3.9)
(2.9)
Payments for investment in subsidiary (including contingent 
consideration), net of cash acquired
-
(8.5)
Net cash outflow from investing activities
(57.4)
(67.1)
Cash flows from financing activities
Receipts from bank loans
13
2.0
52.7
Repayments of bank loans
13
(35.9)
(14.2)
Payment of lease liability
12
(2.1)
(1.3)
Receipts from issue of equity
50.0
-
Payments for costs of raising equity
(3.2)
-
Net cash inflow from financing activities
10.8
37.2
Net increase/(decrease) in cash held
6.3
(5.8)
Cash at beginning of the financial period
8.1
13.9
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash 
equivalents
0.1
-
Closing cash and cash equivalents
14.5
8.1
The above Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.	

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 57
PAGE 56 
Reconciliation of Operating Cash Flows with Reported 
Loss After Tax
For the year ended 31 March 2024
2024
2023
Notes
$M’s
$M’s
Reconciliation of operating cash flows with reported loss 
after tax
Loss after tax for the year attributable to the shareholders
(0.3)
(3.0)
Add/(less) non-cash items
Tax asset recognised
(7.6)
(3.9)
Depreciation and amortisation
52.5
43.5
Other non-cash expenses/(income)
4.7
(1.3)
Contingent consideration and revaluation
-
(9.6)
Unwinding of interest expense for discounted contract liabilities 
and contingent consideration
1.1
1.7
50.7
30.4
Movements in other working capital items
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables
1.7
(6.1)
(Decrease)/increase in current tax payables
(1.4)
2.1
Increase in contract liabilities
3.8
7.9
Increase in contract fulfillment costs
(10.0)
(7.6)
Increase in trade payables, interest payable and accruals
8.4
0.4
2.5
(3.3)
Net cash from operating activities
52.9
24.1
	
	
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
For the year ended 31 March 2024
REPORTING ENTITY
The consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2024 are for EROAD Limited (the “Company”) and 
its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Group”). The Group provides electronic on-board units and software as a 
service to the transport industry. 	
	
	
	
EROAD Limited is a company domiciled in New Zealand registered under the Companies Act 1993 and is a FMC reporting 
entity for the purposes of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.  The Company is listed on the New Zealand Stock 
Exchange (NZX) Main Board and the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX).	
	
	
	
	
BASIS OF PREPARATION
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Practice 
in New Zealand (NZ GAAP). The financial statements comply with New Zealand equivalents to International Financial 
Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS) as appropriate for profit-oriented entities and other New Zealand accounting standards, 
and authoritative notices that are applicable to entities that apply NZ IFRS. These financial statements also comply with 
International Financial Reporting Standards and the requirements of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Group will be 
able to discharge its liabilities including the mandatory repayment terms of the banking facilities as disclosed in Note 13.	
The financial statements are presented in New Zealand dollars ($) which is the Group‘s presentation currency, and all values 
are rounded to million dollars to one decimal place ($M‘s) except where stated.  Items included in the financial statements 
of each of the Group‘s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity 
operates (the “functional currency”). The functional currency of the Company and its New Zealand subsidiaries is New 
Zealand dollars. The functional currency of the Company‘s Australian and North American subsidiaries are Australian 
dollars and United States dollars respectively.  	 	
	
	
All amounts are shown exclusive of goods and services tax (GST) except for trade receivables and trade payables, and 
except where the amount of GST incurred is not recoverable.  When this occurs, GST is recognised as part of the cost of the 
asset or as an expense as applicable.	 	
	
	
The financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis, except for certain financial instruments which are carried 
at fair value.	
	
	
	
.	
	
	
	
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION	
	
	
	
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated at the date on which the Group obtains control, and continue to be consolidated until the 
date when such control ceases. The financial statements are prepared for the same reporting period as the Company, using 
consistent accounting policies. All intra-group transactions and balances arising within the Group are eliminated in full. 
ACCOUNTING POLICIES	
	
	
	
Accounting policies that summarise the measurement basis used and that are relevant to the understanding of the financial 
statements are provided throughout the accompanying notes. 	
	
	
	
The Group adopted all mandatory new and amended NZ IFRS Standards and Interpretations and there has been no material 
impact on the Group‘s financial statements. 	
	
	
	
There are no other new standards, amendments or interpretations that have been issued and are not yet effective, that are 
expected to have a significant impact on the Group.	
	
	
	

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 58 
PAGE 59
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS
In applying the Group‘s accounting policies, management continually evaluates judgements, estimates and assumptions 
based on experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that may have an impact on the Group. All 
judgements, estimates and assumptions made are believed to be reasonable based on the most current set of circumstances 
available to the Group. Actual results may differ from the judgements, estimates and assumptions.	
	
The significant judgements, estimates and assumptions made by management in the preparation of these financial 
statements are outlined within the financial statement notes to which they relate. These are:	
	
	
•	 Taxation - Recognition and utilisation of tax losses	
	
	
	
•	 Intangible assets - assumptions used in the impairment tests; capitalisation of development costs	
	
•	 Property, plant and equipment - determining residual values and useful lives	
	
	
	
PERFORMANCE
This section focuses on the Group’s financial performance.  This section includes the following notes:	
	
NOTE 1 SEGMENT REPORTING	
	
NOTE 2 REVENUE		
	
	
NOTE 3 CONTRACT FULFILMENT AND COSTS TO OBTAIN CONTRACTS 
NOTE 4 CONTRACT LIABILITIES	
NOTE 5 EXPENSES	
	
	
	
NOTE 6 PERSONNEL EXPENSES	
	
	
	
NOTE 1 SEGMENT REPORTING	
	
EROAD operating segments are based on geographic location for operating companies and corporate and development 
costs.  These operating segments equate to the Group’s strategic divisions and are reported in a manner consistent with 
the internal reporting provided to the Chief Executive Officers (“CEOs”). The CEOs are considered to be the chief operating 
decision makers (“CODM”).	 	
	
	
The four segments/strategic divisions offer different services and are managed separately because they require different 
technology, services and marketing strategies. For each strategic division, the CODM reviews internal management reports.
The following summary describes the operations in each of the Group’s segments.	
	
	
	
•	 Corporate & Development:  Corporate head office costs and R&D activities for development of new and existing 
products and services
•	 North America: Operating companies serving customers in North America
•	 Australia: Operating companies serving customers in Australia 
•	 New Zealand: Operating companies serving customers in New Zealand
Segment results that are reported to the CEO include items directly attributable to a segment as well as those that can be 
allocated on a reasonable basis. Unallocated items comprise income tax, derivative financial instruments, finance income 
and expenses.
Inter-segment pricing is determined on an arm’s length basis.
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 60 
PAGE 61
Reportable segment information
Key information related to each reportable segment as provided to the CODM is set out below. 	 	
	
Corporate & 
Development
North America
 New Zealand
Australia 
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
2024
2023
$M's
$M's
$M's
$M's
$M's
$M's
$M's
$M's
Revenue
Software as a Service (Saas) 
revenue
-
-
76.0
65.3
85.5
75.8
10.0
8.3
Hardware revenue
0.2
0.6
2.6
5.4
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.7
Transaction fee revenue 
-
-
-
-
3.3
3.7
-
-
Other revenue 1
74.8
61.7
1.4
1.9
3.0
4.0
0.2
0.3
Total revenue
75.0
62.3
80.0
72.6
92.0
83.7
10.7
9.3
Earnings before interest, 
taxation, depreciation & 
amortisation
(33.6)
(28.5)
22.0
18.1
62.2
53.7
3.0
2.2
Other segment information
Total assets
287.2
277.3
97.2
100.4
89.2
69.5
19.8
15.4
Depreciation of property, plant & 
equipment
(1.9)
(2.1)
(10.7)
(7.8)
(9.1)
(6.9)
(1.3)
(0.6)
Amortisation of intangible assets
(12.4)
(10.2)
(5.1)
(5.1)
(0.9)
(0.9)
(0.6)
(1.7)
Amortisation of contract and 
customer acquisition assets
-
-
(2.0)
(2.3)
(6.4)
(5.4)
(0.8)
(0.6)
1 Revenue from Corporate & Development Markets includes R&D Grant Income of $1.7M  (31 March 2023: $1.6M and reassessment of contingent consideration of 
$9.6M).	
	
	
NOTE 1 SEGMENT REPORTING (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1 SEGMENT REPORTING (CONTINUED)
Reconciliation of information on reportable segments	 	
	
	
2024
2023
 
$M’s
$M’s
Revenue
Total revenue for reportable segments
257.7
227.9
Elimination of inter-segment revenue
(75.7)
(53.0)
Consolidated Revenue
182.0
174.9
 
EBITDA
Total EBITDA for reportable segments
53.6
45.5
Elimination of inter-segment EBITDA
(0.3)
(0.3)
Consolidated EBITDA
53.3
45.2
Depreciation	
	
	
	
Total depreciation for reportable segments
(23.0)
(17.4)
Elimination of inter-segment depreciation
(0.2)
0.2
Consolidated Depreciation
(23.2)
(17.2)
Amortisation of intangible assets
Total amortisation for reportable segments
(19.0)
(17.9)
Elimination of inter-segment amortisation
-
-
Consolidated Amortisation
(19.0)
(17.9)
Total assets	
Total assets for reportable segments
493.4
462.6
Elimination of inter-segment balances
(59.9)
(59.8)
Consolidated Total Assets
433.5
402.8
Allocation of goodwill, property plant and equipment and other intangible assets	
	
	
	
Included within Total Assets are Development Assets of $106.0M (31 March 2023: $100.4M) which for the purpose of the 
segment note have been allocated to the Corporate & Development Market based on the ownership of intellectual property. 
The amortisation for these assets are also presented in the Corporate & Development segment. The Group‘s cash generating 
units (CGUs) are North America, New Zealand and Australia. For impairment testing purposes management allocate the 
Development Assets to the CGU based on the specific CGU that the Development Asset relates to, or if the Development 
Asset is developed for use globally across all CGU‘s, the asset is allocated to CGU‘s based on the proportionate share of the 
Group‘s Contracted Units. Property plant and equipment and other finite intangible assets are also included and tested as part 
of impairment testing of repective CGU‘s.	
	
	
	
Also included in the total assets is the intangible assets acquired through the acquisition of the Coretex subsidiaries and 
resulting goodwill. The allocation of these to respective cash-generating units has been done based on valuation expert advice 
as part of acquisition accounting during the period ended 31 March 2022.	
	
	
	

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 62 
PAGE 63
The allocation of the Development Assets, goodwill and other intangibles to CGU’s within the following reportable segments 
for the purpose of impairment testing was as follows:	
	
	
	
Development Assets
Goodwill
Brand
Customer 
relationships
$M's
$M's
$M's
$M's
31 MARCH 2024
North America
49.8
88.8
1.7
19.2
New Zealand
50.3
5.7
-
1.0
Australia
5.9
13.6
-
3.2
106.0
108.1
1.7
23.4
31 MARCH 2023
North America
46.3
88.8
2.4
20.7
New Zealand
48.3
5.7
-
1.1
Australia
5.8
13.6
-
3.5
100.4
108.1
2.4
25.3
Geographic information 
The geographic information below analyses the Group’s revenue and non-current assets by the Company’s country of 
domicile and other countries. In presenting the following information revenue has been based on the geographic location of 
customers and assets were based on the geographic location of the assets.  These allocations are not aligned with the Group’s 
reportable segments.	
	
	
	
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Revenue
New Zealand
91.8
94.0
All foreign countries: 
  USA
79.6
71.6
  Australia
10.6
9.3
Total revenue
182.0
174.9
Non-current assets
New Zealand
247.7
230.4
All foreign countries:
  USA
79.4
84.6
  Australia
15.0
10.7
Total non-current assets
342.1
325.7
Non-current assets exclude financial instruments and deferred tax assets.	
	
	
	
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Reconciliation of geographical non-current assets 
to total non-current assets	 	
	
	
Geographical non-current assets
342.1
325.7
Deferred tax assets
17.7
15.2
Derivative financial instruments
-
0.2
Total non-current assets
359.8
341.1
NOTE 2 REVENUE
2024
2023
 
$M’s
$M’s
Revenue from contracts with customers
Software as a service (Saas) revenue
171.5
149.4
Hardware revenue (subscription basis)
3.5
6.9
Other   
Transaction fee revenue
3.3
3.7
Other revenue and income
2.0
13.3
Grant income
1.7
1.6
Total Revenues
182.0
174.9
Set out above is the disaggregation of the Group’s revenue. The disaggregation reflects the nature, amount, timing and 
uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. 	
	
	
	
Revenue recognition	
	
	
	
Revenue is measured based on the consideration specified in a contract with a customer. The Group recognises revenue when 
it transfers control over a good or a service to a customer.		
	
	
The Group provides electronic on-board units to its customers, which comprise the provision of hardware and the rendering of 
services. 		
	
	
The supply of electronic on-board units (leased or purchased outright), installation of the units and providing services are 
not distinct and have one single performance obligation (linked to the service contract). Consequently, the Group does not 
recognise revenue separately for these goods and services but recognises this revenue together as the provision of software 
as a service (SAAS) revenue.		
	
	
Each of the Group‘s main sources of revenue are described in detail below:	
	
	
	
	
Software as a service revenue	
	
	
	
Software as a service (SaaS) revenue represents revenue earned from customer contracts for the sale or rental of hardware, 
installation services, training and support services and provision of software services.	
	
As noted above, the Group has determined that for the majority of customers the supply and installation of units and the 
services are not distinct and treated as one single performance obligation. That is, EROAD’s customers do not have the right 
to direct the use of EROAD’s assets (such as the Ehubo, Corehub and TMU units) as EROAD continues to have the right and 
ability to change how the asset operates during the customer’s contract period. These contracts are therefore accounted for 
as service contracts. The Group generates revenue through the sale of hardware assets, rental of hardware assets, installation 
of hardware assets and provision of software services as part of contracts with customers as part of a bundled package. These 
hardware units enable customers to access the software platform offered by the Group. 
NOTE 1 SEGMENT REPORTING (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1 SEGMENT REPORTING (CONTINUED)

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 64 
PAGE 65
The transaction involving hardware and accessories do not convey a distinct good or service. The sale does not transfer 
control to the customer as the Group provides a significant service of integrating the software service to produce a combined 
output. The sale of the hardware, accessories and software service are referred to as Software as a Service (SaaS) revenue, 
which is recognised on a straight line basis over the contract period to reflect the fulfilment of the performance obligations as 
they arise. There are no variable consideration terms within the contracts.
The Group offers installation services as part of a number of promises to transfer goods and services within each contract. 
Installation services do not convey a distinct good or service and therefore are not a separate performance obligation as 
the installation is a set-up activity that does not provide the customer a direct benefit other than access to the software 
services. As a result, the installation service is considered as part of the single performance obligation referred to as software 
as a service (SAAS) revenue, which includes the software service and hardware sale or rental for which the customer 
simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit of the service.	
	
	
	
A contract liability is recognised where consideration is received in advance of the completion of associated performance 
obligations. The contract liability is derecognised over time evenly over the period of the contract as the customer derives 
the benefit evenly from the services provided over the contract period. The majority of contracts are for 3 years and can be 
for a term of up to 5 years. As a result there is a financing component which the group recognise as a finance cost when 
consideration is received in advance.	 	
	
	
Hardware revenue (Subscription-basis)	
	
	
	
Hardware revenue purchased with a subscription is recognized over the first month‘s subscription. Hardware revenue reflects 
hardware sales where a subscription must be separately purchased to utilise the hardware and obtain access to services. The 
hardware together with the monthly subscription is considered a single performance obligation. A receivable is recognised by 
the Group when the right to consideration becomes unconditional, as only the passage of time is required before payment is 
due.	
	
	
	
The installation revenue associated with uncontracted hardware units is included in the hardware revenue line and recognised 
when the installation is completed.	
	
	
	
The services revenue associated with the uncontracted hardware units is included in the software as a service revenue line and 
is recognised when the performance obligation is completed.	
	
	
	
	
	
Transaction fees	 	
	
	
Transaction fee revenue relates to the collection of Road User Charges (RUC) fees. The Group acts as an agent for transport 
authorities in the market that is operates in. Where fees are collected on their behalf, the Group charges a commission. The 
revenue recognised is the net amount of the commission fee earned by the Group.	
	
	
	
Grant income	
	
	
	
Government grants are recognised at fair value in the statement of comprehensive income over the same periods as the costs 
for which the grants are intended to compensate. No unfulfilled conditions or contingencies exist related to the government 
grants.
Other revenue and income	 	
	
	
Included in other income and revenue in 31 March 2023 is $9.6M related to the reassessment of contingent consideration 
related to the acquisition of Coretex Limited.	
	
	
	
Future contracted income	 	
	
	
The Group reports the Non-GAAP measure, Future Contracted Income. The definition of Future Contracted Income includes 
all future hardware and SaaS cash inflows relating to income under non-cancellable long-term agreements. The disclosure 
below aligns with the Future Contracted Income reported by the Group.	
	
	
	
Transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations	
	
	
	
The below table represents the revenue allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied at 
the period end. The revenue amounts yet to be recognised under non-cancellable contract agreements at 31 March 2024 are 
expected to be recognised by EROAD based on the time bands disclosed below. 	
	
	
	
	
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Software as a Service (SaaS) revenue
No later than one year
93.6
88.1
Later than one year, no later than five years
169.1
131.5
Total price allocated to remaining performance obligations
262.7
219.6
NOTE 3 CONTRACT FULFILMENT AND COSTS TO OBTAIN CONTRACTS
Capitalised contract fulfilment costs		
	
	
The Group capitalises incremental costs of fulfilling customer contracts, typically distribution and installation costs. Contract 
fulfilment costs are amortised evenly over the period of the contract. The majority of contracts are for 3 years and can be for a 
term of up to 5 years. Customers who do not sign up to a term have contract fulfilment costs expensed up-front.	
	
	
	
Capitalised contract acquisition costs
The Group has applied a policy of capitalising only costs that are incremental in obtaining contracts with customers, 
typically sales commissions. Contract acquisition costs are amortised evenly over the period of the contract. The majority 
of contracts are for 3 years and can be for a term of up to 5 years. Customers who do not sign up to a term have contract 
acquisition costs expensed up-front.	 	
	
	
The following table provides information about contract fulfilment and costs to obtain contracts with customers:	 	
Contract fulfilment
Costs to obtain contracts
2024
2023
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
Opening net book value
9.3
6.9
4.1
4.0
Additions
10.0
7.8
3.9
3.1
Amortisation
(7.3)
(5.4)
(2.9)
(3.0)
Closing net book value
12.0
9.3
5.1
4.1
Current
5.8
5.3
2.4
2.3
Non-current
6.2
4.0
2.7
1.8
NOTE 2 REVENUE (CONTINUED)
NOTE 2 REVENUE (CONTINUED)

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 66 
PAGE 67
NOTE 4 CONTRACT LIABILITIES 
The Group enters into contracts with customers for the provision of software services over a contracted period. As stated 
in the accounting policies, this revenue is recognised over time as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the 
benefit of the service. The Group has determined that the benefit of the services provided is consumed evenly over the period 
of the contract, and thus the performance obligations are satisfied evenly over the period. Where the Group receives a portion 
of the transaction price of a contract in advance, this is recognised as a contract liability and released over the contract period 
as the Group satisfies its performance obligations. 
	
	
	
	
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Opening balance
19.4
11.9
Amounts deferred during the period
18.8
16.9
Amount recognised in the statement of comprehensive income
(14.6)
(9.4)
23.6
19.4
Current 
10.9
7.4
Non-current
12.7
12.0
NOTE 5 EXPENSES
2024
2023
Notes
$M’s
$M’s
Personnel expenses - net of capitalised employee 
remuneration
6
61.8
57.5
Administrative and other operating expenses
36.5
41.1
SaaS platform costs
28.7
26.0
Directors fees
0.8
0.8
Integration-related expenses
-
3.4
Auditor's remuneration - KPMG
0.5
0.5
Other assurance services - KPMG
0.1
0.1
Tax compliance and advisory services - KPMG
0.3
0.3
Total operating expenses
128.7
129.7
Other assurance services include half year review and procedures over RDTI claim and NZTA reasonable assurance.
During the year the costs expensed for Research and Development was $32.8M (31 March 2023: $37.2M including 
integration costs). 		
	
	
The integration related expenses in the prior year include internal staff time.		
	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 6 PERSONNEL EXPENSES
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Salaries and wages - excluding capitalised commission costs
69.7
74.1
Annual leave
0.5
(1.1)
Performance bonus
0.4
1.4
Share-based payments
4.1
0.1
Salaries and wages capitalised to development and software assets
(12.9)
(17.0)
61.8
57.5

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 68 
PAGE 69
WORKING CAPITAL		
	
	
This section provides information about the primary elements of the Group’s working capital.  This section includes the 
following notes:	
	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 7 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, RESTRICTED CASH AND PAYABLES TO TRANSPORT AGENCIES
NOTE 8 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES	
NOTE 9 TRADE PAYABLES AND ACCRUALS	
	
	
 
NOTE 7 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, RESTRICTED CASH AND PAYABLES TO TRANSPORT AGENCIES
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Cash and cash equivalents
14.5
8.1
Restricted bank accounts
17.8
11.6
32.3
19.7
Cash and cash equivalents exclude restricted bank accounts. Restricted bank accounts are presented separately from cash 
and cash equivalents on the face of the Statement of Financial Position and movements in restricted bank accounts are 
excluded from the Statement of Cash Flows. The restricted bank accounts relate to Road Users tax collected from clients due 
for payment to the appropriate government agency.	
	
	
	
Payables to transport agencies
(17.8)
(11.9)
NOTE 8 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Trade receivables
25.3
22.5
Allowance for expected credit losses on trade receivables
(4.6)
(3.5)
20.7
19.0
Prepayments and other receivables
12.5
15.4
33.2
34.4
In addition to the movement in the expected credit losses, the Group has written off $0.9M (2023: $1.7M) of bad debts to the 
statement of comprehensive income. 	 	
	
	
Trade receivables are amounts due from customers for products sold and services provided.  Trade receivables are recognised 
initially at their transaction price and subsequently measured at the amount to be collected.  Due to the short term nature of 
these debtors, their carrying value is assumed to approximate fair value. 	
	
	
	
The Group recognises an allowance for expected credit losses (ECLs) for all debt instruments not held at fair value through 
profit or loss. The Group applies a simplified approach in calculating ECLs. Therefore, the Group does not track changes in 
credit risk, but instead recognises a loss allowance based on lifetime ECLs at each reporting date. The Group has established 
a provision matrix that is based on its historical credit loss experience, adjusted for forward-looking factors specific to the 
debtors and the economic environment. That is, to measure the expected credit losses, trade receivables have been grouped 
based on customer industry risk characteristics and the days past due. The expected loss rates are based on recent payment 
profiles, historical customer behaviour, age of debt and individual customer circumstances. 	
	
	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 9 TRADE PAYABLES AND ACCRUALS
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Trade payables
12.9
7.6
Tax payable
1.2
2.6
Sundry accruals
16.2
12.8
30.3
23.0
Trade payables are carried at amortised cost.  Due to their short-term nature, they are not discounted.	
	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 8 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES (CONTINUED)

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 70 
PAGE 71
LONG-TERM ASSETS	
	
	
	
This section provides information about the investment the Group has made in long-term assets to operate the business. 
This section includes the following notes:	
	
	
	
NOTE 10 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
NOTE 11 INTANGIBLE ASSETS	
NOTE 12 LEASES AS LESSEE
NOTE 10 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Right of 
use assets
Hardware 
assets
Plant and 
equipment
Leasehold 
improvements
Motor 
vehicles
Office 
equipment
Computers
Total
$M’s
$M's
$M's
$M's
$M's
$M's
$M's
$M's
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2024	
	
	
	
Opening net book 
amount
5.7
68.7
0.1
1.6
0.2
0.6
0.9
77.8
Additions
0.3
33.0
-
-
-
-
0.5
33.8
Disposals
-
(1.3)
-
-
-
-
-
(1.3)
Depreciation charge
(1.5)
(20.3)
-
(0.4)
(0.1)
(0.2)
(0.7)
(23.2)
Effect of movement 
in exchange rates
0.2
1.5
-
-
-
-
-
1.7
Closing net book 
amount
4.7
81.6
0.1
1.2
0.1
0.4
0.7
88.8
AT 31 MARCH 2024
Cost
8.6
135.2
0.8
2.9
0.4
2.0
5.3
155.2
Accumulated 
depreciation
(3.9)
(53.6)
(0.7)
(1.7)
(0.3)
(1.6)
(4.6)
(66.4)
Net book amount
4.7
81.6
0.1
1.2
0.1
0.4
0.7
88.8
Right of 
use assets
Hardware 
assets
Plant and 
equipment
Leasehold 
improvements
Motor 
vehicles
Office 
equipment
Computers
Total
$M's
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2023	
	
	
	
Opening net book 
amount
4.5
54.1
0.1
1.2
0.3
0.6
0.9
61.7
Additions
3.1
27.1
0.1
0.7
-
0.2
0.6
31.8
Disposals
-
(1.2)
-
-
-
-
-
(1.2)
Depreciation 
charge
(1.9)
(14.0)
(0.1)
(0.3)
(0.1)
(0.2)
(0.6)
(17.2)
Effect of movement 
in exchange rates
-
2.7
-
-
-
-
-
2.7
Closing net book 
amount
5.7
68.7
0.1
1.6
0.2
0.6
0.9
77.8
AT 31 MARCH 2023
Cost
9.8
106.1
0.8
3.1
0.8
2.0
4.9
127.5
Accumulated 
depreciation
(4.1)
(37.4)
(0.7)
(1.5)
(0.6)
(1.4)
(4.0)
(49.7)
Net book amount
5.7
68.7
0.1
1.6
0.2
0.6
0.9
77.8
Included in the Hardware Assets is equipment under construction to be leased or sold of $33.2M (2023: $27.8M). Due to the 
majority of the equipment under construction being ultimately sold under contract and forming part of hardware assets on the 
Group‘s fixed asset register it has been accordingly classified under hardware assets.	
	
	
	
Items of plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Cost includes the 
purchase consideration, and those costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary 
for its intended use. Where an item of plant and equipment is disposed of, the gain or loss recognised in the statement of 
comprehensive income is calculated as the difference between the net sales price and the carrying amount of the asset.
The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any 
lease payments made at or before the commencement date, plus any initial direct costs incurred and an estimate of costs to 
restore the underlying asset or the site on which it is located, less any lease incentives received. 	 	
Subsequent costs		
	
	
The Group recognises in the carrying amount of an item of property, plant and equipment the cost of replacing part of such 
an item when that cost is incurred if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within the item will flow to the 
Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other costs are recognised in the statement of comprehensive 
income as an expense in the period they are incurred.	
	
	
	
Impairment
Property plant and equipment is tested for impairment when there are indicators of impairment. It is not possible to identify 
separately identifiable cash flows for property, plant and equipment as hardware assets are sold together with various SAAS 
services as a package. Property plant and equipment is allocated to the Group‘s CGU‘s as described in note 1 for the purposes 
of impairment testing. 	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 10 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED)

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 72 
PAGE 73
Depreciation	
	
	
	
Depreciation begins when the asset is in the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner 
intended by management.  	
The following rates have been used on a straight line basis:	
	
	
	
Leasehold improvements	
	
3 to 9 years	
	
	
Hardware assets	
	
	
3 to 6 years	
	
	
Plant and equipment	
	
3 to 11 years	
	
	
Computer/Office equipment		
1 to 5 years	
	
	
Motor vehicles	
	
	
3 to 5 years	
	
	
Right of use assets		
	
3 to 9 years	
	
	
The above rates reflect the estimated useful lives of the respected categories. Consideration was given to how long assets can 
be deployed and any expected network changes. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the contracted lease term.
NOTE 11 INTANGIBLE ASSETS 
Development
Software
Goodwill
Brand
Customer 
relationships
Patents, 
trademarks and 
other rights
Total
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2024	
	
	
	
Opening net book amount
100.4
5.8
108.1
2.4
25.3
0.1
242.1
Additions
21.0
0.3
-
-
-
-
21.3
Disposals
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amortisation charge
(15.4)
(1.0)
-
(0.7)
(1.9)
-
(19.0)
Closing net book amount
106.0
5.1
108.1
1.7
23.4
0.1
244.4
AT 31 MARCH 2024
Cost
175.6
12.4
108.1
3.3
28.8
0.1
328.3
Accumulated amortisation
(69.6)
(7.3)
-
(1.6)
(5.4)
-
(83.9)
Net book amount
106.0
5.1
108.1
1.7
23.4
0.1
244.4
NOTE 10 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED)
Development
Software
Goodwill
Brand
Customer 
relationships
Patents, 
trademarks and 
other rights
Total
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2023	
	
	
	
Opening net book amount
88.3
3.9
108.1
3.1
28.0
-
231.4
Additions
25.5
2.6
-
-
-
0.1
28.2
Disposals
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Effect of movement in foreign 
exchange rate
0.2
-
-
-
0.2
-
0.4
Amortisation charge
(13.6)
(0.7)
-
(0.7)
(2.9)
-
(17.9)
Closing net book amount
100.4
5.8
108.1
2.4
25.3
0.1
242.1
AT 31 MARCH 2023		
	
Cost
154.6
12.1
108.1
3.3
28.8
0.1
307.0
Accumulated amortisation
(54.2)
(6.3)
-
(0.9)
(3.5)
-
-64.9
Net book amount
100.4
5.8
108.1
2.4
25.3
0.1
242.1
The useful lives of the Group’s Intangible Assets are assessed to be finite except for goodwill. Assets with finite lives are 
amortised over their useful lives and tested for impairment whenever there are indications that the assets may be impaired.
Research and Development	
	
	
	
Expenditure on research activities, undertaken with the prospect of gaining new technical knowledge and understanding, is 
recognised in the statement of comprehensive income when incurred.	
	
	
	
Development activities involve a plan or design for the production of new or substantially improved products and 
processes. Development expenditure is capitalised only if development costs can be measured reliably, the product or 
process is technically and commercially feasible, future economic benefits are probable, and the Group intends to and has 
sufficient resources to complete development and to use or sell the asset. The expenditure capitalised includes the cost of 
materials, direct labour and overhead costs that are directly attributable to preparing the asset for its intended use. Other 
development expenditure is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income when incurred. There is judgement 
involved in relation to whether a project meets the capitalisation criteria, and whether the expenditure can be directly 
attributable to the respective project.		
	
	
Capitalised development expenditure is measured at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment 
losses.	
	
	
	
	
	
Other intangible assets	
	
	
	
Other intangible assets, including customer relationships, brand, patents and trademarks, that are acquired by the Group 
and have finite useful lives are measured at cost less accumulated amortisation and any accumulated impairment losses.
Subsequent expenditure	
	
	
	
Subsequent expenditure is capitalised when it increases the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to 
which relates. All other expenditure, including expenditure on internally generated goodwill and brands, is recognised 
in the statement of comprehensive income when incurred.	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 11 INTANGIBLE ASSETS (CONTINUED)

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 74 
PAGE 75
Amortisation	
	
	
	
Patents	 	
	
	
10 to 20 years
Development Hardware & Platform	
7 to 15 years	
	
	
Development Products	
	
5 to 10 years	
	
	
Software		
	
	
5 to 7 years	
	
	
Customer relationships	
	
15 years	 	
	
Brand	
	
	
	
5 years	 	
	
Impairment	
	
	
	
The acquisition of Coretex on 1 December 2021, meant goodwill was recognised for the excess between the fair value 
consideration paid and the fair value of the net assets acquired. Net assets acquired included finite life intangibles assets 
such as customer relationships, brands, software and development assets.  The goodwill and finite life intangibles were then 
allocated to the cash generating units of the business with the assistance of external specialists.  When goodwill is acquired in 
a business combination, under the accounting standards, NZ IAS 36 requires an impairment test to be completed annually (for 
cash-generating units in which goodwill has been allocated) irrespective of whether there is any indication of impairment. An 
impairment test is also required when there is an indicator of impairment identified each reporting period. Refer to note 1 for 
the allocation of goodwill, property plant and equipment and other finite life intangible assets to cash generating units (CGUs). 
The CGU‘s are considered the lowest level for which there are separately identifiable cashflows. Corporate costs attributable to 
the CGUs are allocated to the respective CGUs as part of impairment testing. Unallocated corporate costs and assets are also 
tested for impairment using a top down approach.	
	
	
	
Impairment testing of CGU’s
To complete the annual impairment testing management assessed the recoverable amount of each of the cash-generating 
units (‘CGU’) of which goodwill, property plant and equipment and finite life intangible assets have been allocated by 
reference to its value in use (‘VIU‘) determined using a discounted cash flows model. The recoverable amounts of the CGUs 
were estimated based on the following significant assumptions:
	
	
	
	
Amount the VIU 
exceeds the 
carrying value
Connected unit 
CAGR
ARPU
CAGR
WACC
$M’s
New Zealand
195.0
5.77%
(0.09)%
12.50%
North America
67.3
15.84%
(0.41)%
12.50%
Australia
16.3
21.47%
(0.98)%
12.50%
The inputs used for the growth in connected units and ARPU in the CGUs reflect past experience and the forecast 
performance of the group. 
	- Terminal growth rate of 2.0% applied to 2029 and thereafter
Sensitivity analysis was undertaken which concluded that New Zealand results are not particularly sensitive to changes in 
the underlying assumptions. Australia and North America are sensitive to the achievement of forecast unit growth, ARPU 
and changes in the discount rate.
NOTE 11 INTANGIBLE ASSETS (CONTINUED)
Change in individual assumptions, while keeping all other assumptions constant which results in the recoverable value to 
equate to the carrying value is shown in the sensitivity analysis below:	
	
Input required for the VIU to equate to the carrying value
Connected unit 
CAGR
ARPU
CAGR
WACC
New Zealand
Not sensitive
Not sensitive
Not sensitive
North America
13.95%
(2.90)%
15.45%
Australia
18.39%
(4.49)%
15.80%
The Group concluded that the recoverable amount of each of the CGU were higher than their respective carrying values 
and therefore no impairment was considered necessary at 31 March 2024.
NOTE 12 LEASES AS LESSEE
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Maturity analysis - contractual undiscounted cash flows
Less than one year
1.5
2.0
One to five years
4.9
5.5
More than five years
0.9
1.3
Total undiscounted lease liabilities
7.3
8.8
Current 
1.2
1.7
Non-current
5.1
5.8
Lease liabilities included in the statement of financial position
6.3
7.5
Amounts recognised in Statement of Comprehensive Income  
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Interest expense on lease liabilities
0.2
0.3
Depreciation on right of use assets
1.5
1.9
Amounts recognised in Statement of Cash Flows 
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Total cash outflow for leases
(2.1)
(1.3)
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, 
discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the Group’s incremental 
borrowing rate. Generally, the Group uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate. 	
	
	
NOTE 11 INTANGIBLE ASSETS (CONTINUED)

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 76 
PAGE 77
Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability comprise the following: 	
	
	
	- fixed payments, including in-substance fixed payments;
	- variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, initially measured using the index or rate as at the 
commencement date;
	- amounts expected to be payable under a residual guarantee;
	- the exercise priced under a purchase option that the Group is reasonably certain to exercise;
	-  lease payments in an optional renewal period if the Group is reasonably certain to exercise an extension option; and
	- penalties for early termination of a lease unless the Group is reasonably certain not to terminate early. 	
	
The lease liability is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. It is remeasured when there is a change 
in future lease payments arising from a change in an index or rate, if there is a change in the Group’s estimate of the amount 
expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee, or if the Group changes its assessment of whether it will exercise a 
purchase, extension or termination option. 	
	
	
	
When the lease liability is remeasured in this way, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right-of-
use asset or is recorded in profit or loss if the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset has been reduced to zero. 	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 12 LEASES AS LESSEE (CONTINUED)
DEBT AND EQUITY	 	
	
	
	
	
This section outlines the Group’s capital structure and the related financing costs.  This section includes the 
following notes:
NOTE 13 BORROWINGS
NOTE 14 FINANCE INCOME AND FINANCE EXPENSES	
NOTE 15 EQUITY
NOTE 16 SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
NOTE 13 BORROWINGS
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Current borrowings
Term Loans
2.5
-
Bank overdraft
-
1.4
2.5
1.4
Non-current borrowings
Term loans 
22.5
30.0
Revolving credit facility
12.3
39.7
Capitalised borrowings costs
(0.7)
(0.5)
34.1
69.2
Terms and debt repayment schedule
2024
2024
2023
2023
Nominal 
Interest
Year of
Maturity
Face 
Value
$M’s
Carrying 
amount
$M’s
Face 
Value
$M’s
Carrying 
amount
$M’s
Term Loans
8.10%
2026
25.0
25.0
30.0
30.0
Capex facility/bank overdraft
8.10%
2026
-
-
1.4
1.4
Revolving credit facility
8.10%
2026
12.3
12.3
39.7
39.7
Capitalised borrowing costs
-
(0.7)
-
(0.5)
37.3
36.6
71.1
70.6
The above nominal interest rate represents the weighted average rate of the entire facility. 

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 78 
PAGE 79
On 29 September 2023, the Group amended its syndicated debt facility with the Bank of New Zealand (BNZ) and the 
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ) and added Kiwibank Limited (Kiwibank). The effective date of the 
amendment is 4 October 2023.	
	
	
	
At 31 March 2024, EROAD had the following facilities in place:	
	
	
	
$25.0M (NZD) Term Loan Facility A – to refinance debt from the prior facility. The Term Loan has a term of 36 months 
with the maturity date in October 2026. The interest rate is variable with reference to a base rate (BKBM bid rate) for the 
selected interest period plus a margin of 3.75%. EROAD may select an interest period of 1,2,3 or 6 months. On 31 December 
2024, total facility commitments will reduce $1.25m on a quarterly basis until the maturity of the facility. Accordingly, $2.5M 
of debt has been classified as current. The full outstanding balance is payable on the termination date.	
$50.0M (NZD) Revolving Credit Facility B  – to refinanace debt from the prior facility and for general corporate purposes. 
The Revolving Credit Facility has a term of 36 months from 4 October 2023 effective refinance date with a periodic roll 
over feature at the end of each interest period (90 days) that is subject to continued compliance with the terms of the loan 
agreement, with the facility having a maturity date in October 2026. Funds may be drawn in NZ Dollars, AU Dollars, or US 
Dollars. The interest rate is variable with reference to the base rate (BKBM bid rate for NZ Dollar drawings, BBSY bid rate 
for AU Dollar drawings, and US Federal Open Market Committee short-term interest rate target for US Dollar drawings) for 
the selected interest period plus a margin of 2.25% where the company‘s net leverage ratio is below 1.0x and 2.45% where 
the company‘s net leverage ratio is above 1.0x . EROAD may select an interest period of 1,2,3 or 6 months.  In addition, 
a Commitment Fee of 2.25% per annum is payable where the company‘s net leverage ratio is below 1.0x, and 2.45% per 
annum is payable where the company‘s net leverage ratio is above 1.0x, is payable on the committed balance of the facility 
quarterly in arrears. On 31 December 2024, total facility commitments will reduce $1.25m on a quarterly basis until the 
maturity of the facility. The full outstanding balance is payable on the termination date.	
	
	
	
$5.0M Multi-option working capital facility – for capital expenditure and general working capital purposes. This is an on 
demand facility with the interest rate to be agreed between the lender and borrower at the time of borrowing plus a margin 
of 2.25%.  In addition, a Commitment Fee of 2.25% per annum is payable on the committed balance of the facility quarterly 
in arrears. The full outstanding balance is payable on the termination date.	 	
	
	
EROAD’s operating covenants to support the above facilities include Interest Cover Ratio, Leverage Ratio and Obligor 
Assets to Group Assets. EROAD was compliant with covenants during the period and at 31 March 2024.	 	
	
The security package for the Multi-Option Credit Facility Agreement includes an all obligations cross-guarantee granted by 
EROAD Financial Services Limited, EROAD Australia Pty Limited, EROAD Inc, Coretex Limited, Imarda Pty Limited, Coretex 
Australia Pty Limited, Coretex NZ Limited, and Coretex USA Inc in favour of the BNZ (in its capacity of Security Trustee for 
the banking syndicate). in respect of the obligations of EROAD Limited, and a General Security Agreements granted by 
EROAD Limited, EROAD Financial Services Limited, EROAD Inc, EROAD Australia Pty Limited, Coretex Limited, Imarda Pty 
Limited, Coretex Australia Pty Limited, Coretex NZ Limited, and Coretex USA Inc in favour of the BNZ (in its capacity of 
Security Trustee for the banking syndicate). 	
	
	
	
Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are 
capitalised as part of the cost of that asset. Other borrowing costs are recognised as an expense in the period in which they 
are incurred.	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 13 BORROWINGS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 14 FINANCE INCOME AND FINANCE EXPENSES
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Finance expenses	 	
	
	
Interest expense
(6.7)
(4.6)
Interest expense - lease liabilities
(0.2)
(0.3)
Interest expense - contract liabilities
(1.1)
(0.9)
Unwinding of interest for contingent consideration
-
(0.8)
Foreign exchange losses
(0.5)
(0.5)
Total finance expenses
(8.5)
(7.1)
Finance income	
	
	
	
Interest income
(0.7)
(0.3)
NOTE 15 EQUITY
Paid up capital	
	
	
	
All issued shares are fully paid up and have equal voting rights and share equally in dividends and surplus on winding up.	
	
	
	
Number of 
ordinary shares
Issue price
$
Issued Capital
$
1 APRIL 2023
112,628,412
305.7
Shares issued to employees
700,982
1.55
1.0
Shares issued in September 2023 equity placement
41,742,072
0.70
29.2
Shares issued in October 2023 equity placement
29,749,556
0.70
20.8
Costs of raising capital
-
-
(3.2)
31 MARCH 2024
184,821,022
353.5
At 31 March 2024 there was 184,821,022 authorised and issued ordinary shares (31 March 2023: 112,628,412). 386,166 (31 
March 2023: 386,166) shares are held in trust for employees in relation to the long-term incentive plan and are accounted 
for as treasury stock. 	
	
	
	
The calculation of both basic and diluted loss/profit per share at 31 March 2024 was based on the loss attributable to 
ordinary shareholders of $0.3M (2023: loss of $3.0M). The weighted number of ordinary shares on 31 March 2024 was 
149,705,877 (2023: 110,798,841) for basic earnings per share and 150,215,917 for diluted earnings per share 
(2023: 111,108,924).		
	
	

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 80 
PAGE 81
Share capital premium/discount
This account is for the difference between the issued share price and the trading share price (or fair value share price) on 
date of issue and includes contingent consideration portion classified as equity related to the acquisition of Coretex.
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Opening balance 
19.9
6.5
Contingent Shares issued
-
9.7
Contingent shares forfeited
-
3.7
19.9
19.9
Other components of equity include: 
•	 Translation reserve - comprises foreign currency translation differences arising from the translation of financial 
statements of the Group’s foreign subsidiaries into New Zealand dollars.		
	
	
•	 Hedging reserve - the hedging reserve is used to record gains or losses on instruments used as cash flow hedges. The 
amounts are recognised in profit and loss when the hedged transaction affects profit and loss.	
	
	
•	 Retained earnings - includes all current and prior period retained profits and losses and share-based employee 
remuneration. 		
	
	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 16 SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
At 31 March 2024, the Group had the following share-based payment arrangements.	 	
	
	
FY20 Long Term Incentive Grant	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Under the FY20 long term Incentive (LTI) Grant, 56,949 performance share rights (PSRs) remain outstanding as at 31 March 
2024. PSRs were issued (for nil consideration) to participants which convert to shares (for nil consideration) if targets 
are met. PSRs do not entitle the holder to receive dividends or other distributions, or vote in respect of EROAD Limited 
ordinary shares, although under the terms of the plan an additional number of shares will be issued on conversion of fully 
vested PSRs to reflect dividends paid to EROAD Limited shares prior to exercise. On becoming exercisable, each PSR 
entitles the holder to one fully paid ordinary EROAD Limited share, subject to adjustment in accordance with the plan rules 
and the performance hurdles, ranking equally with all other EROAD Limited ordinary shares. For the FY20 LTI plan, the 
award is linked to growth in EROAD’s total contracted units (TCUs) between 1 April 2019 and 31 March 2022. Participants 
bear the tax liability of the LTI plan. The Board retains discretion over the final outcome of PSR payments, to allow 
appropriate adjustments where unanticipated circumstances may impact performance over the measurement period.
FY22 Share Retention Grant	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Under the FY22 Share Retention Grant, 145,671 performance share rights (PSRs) were issued (for nil consideration) to 
participants which convert to shares (for nil consideration) if targets are met. PSRs do not entitle the holder to receive 
dividends or other distributions, or vote in respect of EROAD Limited ordinary shares. On becoming exercisable, each PSR 
entitles the holder to one fully paid ordinary EROAD Limited share, subject to adjustment in accordance with the plan rules 
and the performance hurdles, ranking equally with all other EROAD Limited ordinary shares.  
For the FY22 LTI plan, the award is linked to the participant completing remaining employed for two years following the 
completion date. This scheme had a vesting date of 30 November 2023 and ultimately vested on 07 December 2023. 
84,693 PSRs vested with the remaining balance having lapsed due to performance criteria not being met or surrendered to 
meet tax obligations.	
FY23 Long Term Incentive Grant #1	
	
	
	
Under the FY23 Long Term Incentive (LTI) Grant #1, 467,651 performance share rights (PSRs) were issued (for nil 
consideration) to participants which convert to shares (for nil consideration) if targets are met. PSRs do not entitle the 
holder to receive dividends or other distributions, or vote in respect of EROAD Limited ordinary shares. On becoming 
exercisable, each PSR entitles the holder to one fully paid ordinary EROAD Limited share, subject to adjustment in 
accordance with the plan rules and the performance hurdles, ranking equally with all other EROAD Limited ordinary shares.
The FY23 LTI Plan had a vesting date of 31 March 2023 and ultimately vested on 06 April 2023. 290,672 PSRs vested with 
the remaining balance having lapsed due to performance criteria not being met or surrendered to meet tax obligations.
NOTE 15 EQUITY (CONTINUED)
NOTE 16 SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)
FY23 Share Retention Grant #1	
	
	
	
Under the FY23 Share Retention Grant #1, 403,691 performance share rights (PSRs) were issued (for nil consideration) 
to participants which convert to shares (for nil consideration) if targets are met. PSRs do not entitle the holder to receive 
dividends or other distributions, or vote in respect of EROAD Limited ordinary shares. On becoming exercisable, each PSR 
entitles the holder to one fully paid ordinary EROAD Limited share, subject to adjustment in accordance with the plan rules 
and the performance hurdles, ranking equally with all other EROAD Limited ordinary shares.  
For the FY23 Share Retention Grant #1, the award is linked to the participant remaining employed by Eroad on the vesting 
date of 30 May 2024.
FY23 Share Retention Grant #2	
	
	
	
Under the FY23 Share Retention Grant #2, 70,000 performance share rights (PSRs) were issued (for nil consideration) 
to participants which convert to shares (for nil consideration) if targets are met. PSRs do not entitle the holder to receive 
dividends or other distributions, or vote in respect of EROAD Limited ordinary shares. On becoming exercisable, each PSR 
entitles the holder to one fully paid ordinary EROAD Limited share, subject to adjustment in accordance with the plan rules 
and the performance hurdles, ranking equally with all other EROAD Limited ordinary shares. 
For the FY23 Share Retention Grant #2, the award is linked to the participants remaining employed by Eroad on the vesting 
date of 30 September 2023. The grant ultimately vested on 22 November 2023. 43,372 PSRs vested with the remaining 
balance having lapsed due to performance criteria not being met or surrendered to meet tax obligations.	
FY24 Share Retention Grant #1	
	
	
	
Under the FY24 Share Retention Grant,  661,386 performance share rights (PSRs) were issued (for nil consideration) to 
a participant which convert to shares (for nil consideration) if targets are met. PSRs do not entitle the holder to receive 
dividends or other distributions, or vote in respect of EROAD Limited ordinary shares.  On becoming exercisable, each PSR 
entitles the holder to one fully paid ordinary EROAD Limited share, subject to adjustment in accordance with the plan rules 
and the performance hurdles, ranking equally with all other EROAD Limited ordinary shares. 
The FY24 Share Retention Grant #1 had three vesting dates aligned to performance hurdles. The first two of these hurdles 
have been met with 281,975 PSRs vesting and 156,964 surrendered to meet tax obligations. One further hurdle will vest 
(subject to performance hurdles being met) after 30 Septermber 2024.
FY24 Long Term Incentive Grant #1	
	
	
	
Under the FY24 Long Term Incentive (LTI) Grant #1, entitlements equating to $3.5m have been offered to participants 
subject to performance hurdles being met. Participants may be paid in cash or shares. Under the FY24 grant, life to date 
we have issued 1,493,098 performance share rights (PSRs) for nil consideration. PSRs do not entitle the holder to receive 
dividends or other distributions, or vote in respect of EROAD Limited ordinary shares. On becoming exercisable, each PSR 
entitles the holder to one fully paid ordinary EROAD Limited share, subject to adjustment in accordance with the plan rules 
and the performance hurdles, ranking equally with all other EROAD Limited ordinary shares. 
The FY24 LTI Grant vests after determining financial results for 31 March 2026.	
	
	
	
	
	
	
FY24 Long Term Incentive Grant #2	 	
	
	
Under the FY24 Long Term Incentive Grant #2, 278,437 performance share rights (PSRs) were issued (for nil consideration) 
to a participant which convert to shares (for nil consideration) if targets are met. PSRs do not entitle the holder to receive 
dividends or other distributions, or vote in respect of EROAD Limited ordinary shares.  On becoming exercisable, each PSR 
entitles the holder to one fully paid ordinary EROAD Limited share, subject to adjustment in accordance with the plan rules 
and the performance hurdles, ranking equally with all other EROAD Limited ordinary shares. 
The FY24 LTI Grant vests after determining financial results for 31 March 2024.	
	
	
	

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 82 
PAGE 83
	
	
	
Grant date/employees entitled
Shares granted
Vesting conditions
OCT 21
JUL 22
OCT 22
DEC 22
JUL 23
Shares granted to key management personnel
FY23 Performance Share Rights
-
52,119
89,983
-
-
•	 1 year service from grant date
FY24 Performance Share Rights
-
-
-
-
878,153
•	 3 years service from grant date and based on performance and financial results for all 3 years to 31 March 2026
FY24 Performance Share Rights
-
-
-
-
278,437
•	 Based on financial results for 31 March 2024
FY24 Performance Share Rights
-
-
-
-
661,386
•	 1.25 years service from grant date and based on individual performance
Performance Shares Rights granted to 
other employees	 	
	
	
FY22 Performance Share Rights
145,671
-
-
-
-
•	 The award is linked to  remaining employed for 2 years following the completion date
FY23 Performance Share Rights
-
326,549
-
-
-
•	 1 year service from grant date
FY23 Performance Share Rights
-
-
70,000
-
-
•	 The award is linked to the participant remaining employed by Eroad on the vesting date of 30 September 2023
FY23 Performance Share Rights
-
-
-
403,691
-
•	 Participants bear the tax liability of the PSR plan.  The Board retains discretion over the final outcome of PSR 
payments, to allow appropriate adjustments where unanticipated circumstances may impact performance over 
the measurement period.
•	 The award is linked to the participant remaining employed by Eroad on the vesting date of 30 May 2024
FY24 Performance Share Rights
-
-
-
-
614,945
•	 3 years service from grant date and based on performance and financial results for all 3 years to 31 March 2026
145,671
378,668
159,983
403,691
2,432,921
The number of shares granted and forfeited during the period were as follows:
NOTE 16 SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 84 
PAGE 85
EROAD Performance Share Rights granted October 19	  	
2024
2023
Outstanding at 1 April
56,949
673,488
Granted during the period
-
-
Forfeited during the period
-
(215,414)
Vested during the period
-
(401,125)
Outstanding at 31 March
56,949
56,949
EROAD Performance Share Rights granted October 21	
2024
2023
Outstanding at 1 April
127,338
145,671
Forfeited during the period
-
(18,333)
Surrendered during the period
(42,375)
-
Vested during the period
(84,963)
-
Outstanding at 31 March
-
127,338
EROAD Performance Share Rights - granted June 22	
2024
2023
Outstanding at 1 April
290,672
-
Granted during the period
-
467,651
Forfeited during the period
-
(176,979)
Surrendered during the period
-
-
Vested during the period
(290,672)
-
Outstanding at 31 March
-
290,672
EROAD Performance Share Rights - granted October 22	
2024
2023
Outstanding at 1 April
59,500
-
Granted during the period
-
70,000
Forfeited during the period
(3,500)
(10,500)
Surrendered during the period
(12,628)
-
Vested during the period
(43,372)
-
Outstanding at 31 March
-
59,500
EROAD Performance Share Rights - granted December 22	
2024
2023
NOTE 16 SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)
Outstanding at 1 April
403,691
-
Granted during the period
-
403,691
Forfeited during the period
(79,919)
-
Surrendered during the period
-
-
Vested during the period
-
-
Outstanding at 31 March
323,772
403,691
EROAD Performance Share Rights - granted July 23	
2024
2023
Outstanding at 1 April
-
-
Granted during the period
1,493,098
-
Forfeited during the period
(135,105)
-
Surrendered during the period
-
-
Vested during the period
-
-
Outstanding at 31 March
1,357,993
-
EROAD Performance Share Rights - granted July 23	
2024
2023
Outstanding at 1 April
-
-
Granted during the period
278,437
-
Forfeited during the period
-
-
Surrendered during the period
-
-
Vested during the period
-
-
Outstanding at 31 March
278,437
-
EROAD Performance Share Rights - granted July 23	
2024
2023
Outstanding at 1 April
-
-
Granted during the period
661,386
-
Forfeited during the period
-
-
Surrendered during the period
(156,964)
-
Vested during the period
(281,975)
-
Outstanding at 31 March
222,447
-
During the year-ended 31 March 2024 an amount of $4.1M (2023: $0.1M) was recognised as an expense within the 
statement of comprehensive income in relation to share-based payments for all share plans.
As at 31 March 2024, an amount of $4.6M (2023: $1.0M) is included in share based reserves in equity.	
	
	
	
NOTE 16 SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 86 
PAGE 87
FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT	 	
	
	
This section outlines the key risk management activities undertaken to manage the Group’s exposure to 
financial risk.  This section includes the following notes:	
	
	
	
NOTE 17 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
NOTE 18 HEDGE ACCOUNTING	
NOTE 19 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
NOTE 17 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
As a result of the Group’s operations and sources of finance, it is exposed to credit risk, liquidity risk and market risks which 
include foreign currency risk, commodity price risk and interest rate risk. These risks are described below.  The principles 
under which these risks are managed are set out in policy documents approved by the Board. The policy documents 
identify the risks and set out the Group’s objectives, policies and processes to measure, manage and report the risks. The 
policies are reviewed periodically to reflect changes in financial markets and the Group’s businesses. 	
	
Categories of financial instruments	 	
	
	
	
	
	
Financial assets	
	
	
	
All financial assets of the Group are classified at amortised cost except for hedging instruments that are recognised at fair value.
Financial liabilities	
	
	
	
All financial liabilities of the Group are classified at amortised cost except for hedging instruments that are recognised at fair value.
The Group holds the following financial assets and liabilities, the table below shows their carrying amount and measurement basis.
2024
2023
Amortised 
cost
Other 
amortised 
cost
FVTPL
Fair Value 
hedging 
instruments
Amortised 
cost
Other 
amortised 
cost
FVTPL
Fair Value 
hedging 
instruments
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
Financial assets
Cash and cash 
equivalents
14.5
-
-
-
8.1
-
-
-
Restricted bank 
account
17.8
-
-
-
11.6
-
-
-
Trade receivables
25.3
-
-
-
22.5
-
-
-
Derivative financial 
assets
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.2
57.6
-
-
-
42.2
-
-
0.2
Financial liabilities
Borrowings
-
36.6
-
-
-
70.6
-
-
Employee 
Entitlements
-
4.1
-
-
-
3.7
-
-
Lease liabilities
-
6.3
-
-
-
7.5
-
-
Trade and other 
payables
-
30.3
-
-
-
23.0
-
-
Payables to transport 
agencies
-
17.8
-
-
-
11.9
-
-
Derivative financial 
liability
-
-
-
0.4
-
-
-
-
-
95.1
-
0.4
-
116.7
-
-
(a) Credit risk	
	
	
	
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its 
contractual obligations, and it arises principally from the Group’s trade receivables from customers in the normal course of 
business and bank balances. The Group manages its exposure to credit risk.		
	
	
The Group‘s cash balances is held with a number of banks with the level of exposure to credit risk considered minimal with 
low levels of cash held.  Trade receivables balances are monitored on an ongoing basis. The Group‘s exposure to credit 
risk for trade receivables is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each customer. The creditworthiness 
of a customer or counterparty is determined by a number of qualitative and quantitative factors. Qualitative factors 
include external credit ratings (where available), payment history and strategic importance of customer or counterparty. 
Quantitative factors include transaction size, net assets of customer or counterparty, and ratio analysis on liquidity, cash 
flow and profitability. It is the Group’s policy that all customers who wish to trade on terms are subject to credit verification 
on an ongoing basis with the intention of minimising bad debts. The nature of the Group’s trade receivables is represented 
by regular turnover of product and billing of customers based on the Group’s contractual payment terms. In North America, 
the Group requires that customers under a certain fleet size to purchase the hardware with an upfront payment regardless 
of credit verification. 	
	
	
	
The carrying amount of the Group’s financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure as summarised below.
The aging of the Group’s Trade receivables at the reporting date was as follows:	
	
	
	
	
Gross
Allowance for 
doubtful debts
Gross
Allowance for 
doubtful debts
2024
2024
2023
2023
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
Not past due
8.4
0.4
7.5
0.2
Past due 1-30 days
6.3
0.4
6.3
0.3
Past due 31-60 days
2.7
0.2
2.2
0.1
Past due over 61 days
7.9
3.6
6.5
2.9
25.3
4.6
22.5
3.5
	
	
	
b) Market risk	
	
	
	
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rates, 
will affect the Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management 
is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return on risk.
Interest rate risk	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in 
market interest rates.	
	
	
	
Changes in interest rates expose the Group to changes in the fair value of borrowings subject to fixed interest rates (fair 
value risk), and changes in future interest payments on borrowings subject to floating interest rates (cash flow risk).
The Group is exposed to movements in interest rates on its interest-bearing borrowings.	
	
	
	
The Group enters into interest rate swap agreements in order to provide an effective cash flow hedge against the variability 
in floating interest rates.  See note 18 for details of interest rate swap agreements.	
	
	
	
To comply with the Group’s risk management policy, the hedge ratio is based on the interest rate swap notional amount to 
hedge the same notional amount of bank loans. This results in a hedge ratio of 1:1. This is the same as used for actual risk 
management purposes, and such a ratio is appropriate for the purposes of hedge accounting as it does not result in an 
imbalance that would create hedge ineffectiveness.	
	
	
	
NOTE 17 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 88 
PAGE 89
In these hedge relationships the main sources of ineffectiveness are: 	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
•	 a significant change in the credit risk of either party to the hedging relationship; 	 	
	
	
•	 where the hedge instrument has been transacted on a date different to the rate set date of the bank loan, interest rates 
could differ; and 	
	
	
	
•	 differences in repricing dates between the swaps and the borrowings. 	 	
	
	
Other than these sources, due to the alignment of the hedged risk in the hedged item and hedged instrument, hedge 
ineffectiveness is not expected to arise.
	
	
	
	
Foreign exchange risk	
	
	
	
Foreign exchange risk is the risk that the value of the Group‘s assets, liabilities and financial performance will fluctuate due 
to changes in foreign currency rates. The Group is exposed to currency risk on sales transactions that are denominated in 
a currency other than the respective functional currencies of Group entities, primarily the US Dollar (USD) and Australian 
Dollar (AUD). The Group is also exposed to currency risk on expense transactions that are denominated in a currency other 
than the respective functional currencies of Group entities, primarily the US Dollar (USD), Australian Dollar and Euro (EUR). 
The Group, may on occasion, enter into forward exchange contracts and foreign currency options to hedge the exposure to 
foreign currency fluctuations on sales receipts and inventory purchases.	
	
	
	
The Group reports in New Zealand dollars. Movements in foreign currency exchange rates affect reported financial 
results, financial position and cash flows. Where practical, the Group attempts to reduce this risk by matching revenues 
and expenditures, as well as assets and liabilities, by country and by currency. The Group at times will enter into forward 
exchange contracts and foreign currency options to manage foreign exchange risk on the forecasted foreign currency 
transactions (namely being the forecasted profits of the foreign currency subsisdiaries).  Refer to note 18 for details on 
foreign currency option agreements.	 	
	
	
	
	
	
Foreign exchange rates applied against the New Zealand Dollar, at 31 March are as follows:	
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
AUD 1
0.92
0.94
USD 1
0.60
0.63
	
	
	
The Group’s exposure to foreign currency risk at the reporting date was as follows (all amounts are denominated in New 
Zealand dollars):	
	
	
	
	
	
	
2024
2023
AUD
USD
AUD
USD
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
Cash and cash equivalents
0.8
3.1
1.1
2.7
Trade receivables
3.3
11.3
3.1
10.6
Lease liabilities
0.1
3.0
0.2
3.2
NOTE 17 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)
Summarised sensitivity analysis 	
	
	
	
The following table summarises the sensitivity of the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities to interest rate and 
foreign currency risk:	
	
	
	
Foreign Currency Risk
Interest Risk
-10%
+10%
-10BPS
+10BPS
Profit
Equity
Profit
Equity
Profit
Equity
Profit
Equity
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
2024
Cash and cash equivalents
(0.3)
(0.3)
0.3
0.3
(0.1)
(0.1)
0.1
0.1
Trade receivables
(1.0)
(1.0)
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
Lease liabilities
(0.2)
(0.2)
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
(0.1)
(0.1)
Interest rate swap
-
-
-
-
-
(0.2)
-
0.2
Total increase/ (decrease)
(1.5)
(1.5)
1.5
1.5
-
(0.2)
-
0.2
-10%
+10%
-10BPS
+10BPS
Profit
Equity
Profit
Equity
Profit
Equity
Profit
Equity
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
2023
Cash and cash equivalents
(0.3)
(0.3)
0.3
0.3
(0.1)
(0.1)
0.1
0.1
Trade receivables
(1.0)
(1.0)
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
Lease liabilities
(0.2)
(0.2)
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
(0.1)
(0.1)
Total increase/ (decrease)
(1.5)
(1.5)
1.5
1.5
-
-
-
-
(c)  Liquidity risk	 	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as and when they become due and 
payable. The Group’s approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient 
liquidity to meet its liabilities when they become due and payable, under both normal and stressed conditions, without 
incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group’s reputation. 	 	
	
	
The Group ensures that it has sufficient cash on demand to meet expected operational expenses for a period of 90 days, 
including the servicing of financial obligations; this excludes the potential impact of extreme circumstances that cannot 
reasonably be predicted, such as natural disasters.	
	
	
	
	
The following table details the Group‘s contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments 
and excluding the impact of netting agreements, as at the reporting date. Refer to Note 13 for the maturity profile of the 
Group‘s borrowings. Also refer to note 12 for the maturity profile of Group‘s Leases.	
	
	
NOTE 17 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 90 
PAGE 91
1 year 
or less
1 to 5 
years
Over 
5 years
Total 
contractual 
cash flows
Carrying 
amount of 
liabilities
Notes
$M's
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
2024
Non-derivative financial liabilities
Borrowings
13
2.5
34.8
-
37.3
36.6
Employee Entitlements
4.1
-
-
4.1
4.1
Trade and other payables
9
29.1
-
-
29.1
29.1
Payable to transport agencies
7
17.8
-
-
17.8
17.8
53.5
34.8
-
88.3
87.6
Derivative financial liabilities
Foreign currency options
0.3
0.1
-
0.4
0.4
Total financial liabilities and 
derivatives
0.3
0.1
-
0.4
0.4
1 year 
or less
1 to 5 
years
Over 
5 years
Total 
contractual 
cash flows
Carrying 
amount of 
liabilities
Notes
$M's
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
2023
Non-derivative financial liabilities
Borrowings
13
1.4
69.7
-
71.1
70.6
Employee Entitlements
3.7
-
-
3.7
3.7
Trade and other payables
9
20.4
-
-
20.4
20.4
Payable to transport agencies
7
11.9
-
-
11.9
11.9
37.4
69.7
-
107.1
106.6
Derivative financial liabilities
Interest rate swaps
-
-
-
-
-
Total financial liabilities and 
derivatives
-
-
-
-
-
NOTE 17 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (CONTINUED)
NOTE 18 HEDGE ACCOUNTING
Derivatives are measured at fair value. 	
	
	
	
Interest rate swaps	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
The Group uses interest rate swaps to manage its risk associated with interest rate fluctuations. Interest rate swaps are 
initially recognised at fair value on the date a contract is entered into and are subsequently measured at fair value on each 
reporting date. The fair values of the interest rate swaps are determined based on cash flows discounted to present value 
using current market interest rates.	
	
	
	
Cash flow hedges	 	
	
	
	
	
	
	
The Group has entered into interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk in relation to its floating rate debt. These 
interest rate swaps qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. When interest rate swaps meet the criteria for cash flow hedge 
accounting, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognised in other comprehensive 
income, while the ineffective portion is recognised in the income statement. Amounts taken to reserves are recognised as a 
reclassification adjustment to profit or loss when the forecast transaction occurs. When interest rate swaps do not meet the 
criteria for cash flow hedge accounting, all movements in fair value of the hedging instrument are recognised in the income 
statement.	
	
	
	
Under the interest rate swap agreements that qualify for cash flow hedge accounting, the Group has a right to receive 
interest at variable rates and to pay interest at fixed rates for its New Zealand dollar denominated loans. 		
At 31 March 2024, the Group had interest rate swap agreements in place with a total notional principal amount of $10.0M 
(31 March 2023 there were no interest rate swaps in place). The Group applies a hedge ratio of 1:1. These agreements 
effectively change the Group’s interest exposure on the principal covered by the interest rate swaps from a floating rate to 
fixed rates. 	
	
	
	
The fair value of these agreements at 31 March 2024 is a $0.4M net liability, comprised of $0.5M of swap liabilities and $0.1M 
of swap assets (31 March 2023: $0.2M net asset, comprised of $0.3M of swap liabilities and $0.5M of swap assets). Of this, a 
liability of $0.3M is current (31 March 2023: $0.3M). The agreements cover notional amounts for terms of up to 1 year.	
	
	
	
The notional principal amounts and the period of expiry of the cash flow hedge interest rate swap contracts are as follows:	
	
	
	
	
Nominal 
amount of 
the hedging 
instrument
Carrying amount 
- derivative 
assets/
(liabilities)
Change in 
value used for 
calculating hedge 
ineffectiveness
Hedging (gain) or 
loss recognised 
in other 
comprehensive 
income
Hedging 
(gain) or loss 
recognised 
in income 
statement
$M's
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
$M’s
2024
Cash flow hedging		
	
	
Maturity: 12 months
10.0
-
-
-
-
There was no hedge ineffectiveness recognised in profit or loss during the year (31 March 2023: nil).	
	
Foreign currency options	 	
	
	
The Group uses forward exchange contracts and foreign currency options to manage its risk associated with exchange 
rate fluctuations. These are initially recognised at fair value on the date a contract is entered into and are subsequently 
measured at fair value on each reporting date. The fair values of the forward exchange contracts and foreign currency 
options is determined using quoted forward exchange rates at the reporting date and present value calculations.	 	
Cash flow hedges	 	
	
	
The Group has entered into foreign currency collar options to manage its foreign currency risk in relation to its overseas 
subsidiaries profits. These foreign currency collar options qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. When foreign currency 
collar options meet the criteria for cash flow hedge accounting, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging 
instrument is recognised in other comprehensive income, while the ineffective portion is recognised in the income 
statement. Amounts taken to reserves are transferred out of reserves and included in the measurement of the hedged 
transaction when the forecast transaction occurs. When foreign currency collar options do not meet the criteria for cash 
flow hedge accounting, all movements in fair value of the hedging instrument are recognised in the income statement.	

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 92 
PAGE 93
Under the foreign currency collar option agreements that qualify for cash flow hedge accounting, the Group has a right to 
buy at a cap and sell at a floor on the same notional amount of USD with the same expiration date.	
	
At 31 March 2024, the Group had foreign currency collar option agreements in place with a total notional principal amount 
of $10.6M USD (31 March 2023: $9.8M USD. The Group applies a hedge ratio of 1:1. These foreign currency collar options 
limit the Group‘s exposure to foreign currency exposure within a certain range.	
	
	
	
The fair value of these agreements at 31 March 2024 is a $0.4M net liability, comprised of $0.5M of swap liabilities and $0.1M 
of swap assets (31 March 2023: $0.2M net asset, comprised of $0.3M of swap liabilities and $0.5M of swap assets). Of this, a 
liability of $0.3M is current (31 March 2023: $0.3M). The agreements cover notional amounts for terms of up to 1 year. 
The notional principal amounts and the period of expiry of the cash flow hedge foreign currency collar option contracts are 
as follows:	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Maturity 
(months)
Weighted 
average rate
Nominal amount 
of the hedging 
instrument
Derivative 
assets
Derivative 
liabilities
$M’s USD
$M’s
$M’s
2024 Cash flow hedging	
	
	
	
NZD:USD foreign currency collar options
1-22
0.6161
10.6
-
(0.4)
	
	
	
	
	
Maturity 
(months)
Weighted 
average rate
Nominal amount 
of the hedging 
instrument
Derivative 
assets
Derivative 
liabilities
$M’s USD
$M’s
$M’s
2023 Cash flow hedging	
	
	
	
NZD:USD foreign currency collar options
1-12
0.6124
9.8
0.2
-
There was no hedge ineffectiveness recognised in profit or loss during the year (31 March 2023: nil).	
	
	
NOTE 19 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The carrying amounts of the Groups financial assets and liabilities approximate their fair value due to their short maturity 
periods or variable rate nature, with the exception of interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives. All of the Group‘s 
derivatives are in designated hedge relationships and are measured and recognised at fair value. Refer to the Note 18 
Hedge accounting for detail on how fair value is determined for the Group‘s derivatives.	
	
	
	
The fair value hierarchy described below is used to provide an indication of the level of estimation or judgement required in 
determining fair value.	
	
	
	
Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.	 	
	
	
Level 2 Inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices) other 
than quoted prices included within level 1.	
	
	
	
Level 3 Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).	
	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 18 HEDGE ACCOUNTING (CONTINUED)
Financial assets 	
Carrying amount
Fair value
$M’s
$M’s
31 MARCH 2024
Foreign currency options - cash flow hedge
Level 2
-
-
-
-
Carrying amount
Fair value
$M’s
$M’s
31 MARCH 2023
Foreign currency options - cash flow hedge
Level 2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
Financial liabilities	
	
	
	
 	
Carrying amount
Fair value
$M’s
$M’s
31 MARCH 2024
Interest rate swaps and foreign currency options - cash flow hedge
Level 2
(0.4)
(0.4)
(0.4)
(0.4)
Carrying amount
Fair value
$M’s
$M’s
31 MARCH 2023
Interest rate swaps - cash flow hedge
Level 2
-
-
-
-
Capital management	
	
	
	
The Group’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to 
sustain future development of the business. The Board monitors the return on capital employed, which the Group defines 
as reported EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Tax) divided by capital employed. 	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 19 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT (CONTINUED)

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 94 
PAGE 95
OTHER
This section contains additional notes and disclosures that aid in understanding the Group’s position and 
performance but do not form part of the primary sections. This section includes the following notes:	
	
	
NOTE 20 INCOME TAX EXPENSE	
	
	
	
NOTE 21 DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES	
	
NOTE 22 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	
	
	
NOTE 23 CAPITAL COMMITMENTS	
	
	
	
NOTE 24 CONTINGENT LIABILITIES	 	
	
	
NOTE 25 NET TANGIBLE ASSETS PER SHARE	 	
	
NOTE 26 EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO BALANCE DATE	
	
	
NOTE 20 INCOME TAX EXPENSE
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
(a) Reconciliation of effective tax rate	
	
	
	
Loss before income tax
(7.0)
(5.1)
Income tax using the Company's domestic tax rate of 28% 
(2.0)
(1.4)
Non-deductible expense/(non-assessable income)
(0.2)
(2.5)
Adjustment related to prior period
(3.9)
(0.9)
Utilisation of tax losses previously unrecognised
(0.8)
(0.2)
Current-year losses for which no deferred tax asset is recognised
0.2
1.8
Effect of different tax rates of subsidiaries operating overseas
-
(0.1)
Change in tax rates
-
1.2
Income tax benefit
(6.7)
(2.1)
(b)  Current tax expense	
	
	
	
Current year
0.9
1.8
0.9
1.8
(b)  Deferred tax expense 	 	
	
Current year
(3.7)
(4.2)
Adjustments in respect of prior periods
(3.9)
(0.3)
(7.6)
(3.9)
Income tax benefit
(6.7)
(2.1)
At 31 March 2024 there were no imputation credits available to shareholders (2023: Nil)	
	
	
	
NOTE 20 INCOME TAX EXPENSE (CONTINUED)
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Current tax and deferred tax is recognised in profit or loss except to 
the extent that it relates to a business combination, or items recognised directly in equity or in other comprehensive income. 
Current tax is the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the period, using tax rates enacted or 
substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous periods. Current tax 
payable also includes any tax liability arising from the declaration of dividends.	
	
	
	
Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for 
financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that 
are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or 
substantively enacted by the reporting date.	
	
	
	
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and 
they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they 
intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realised simultaneously.
A deferred tax asset is recognised for unused tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences, to the extent that it 
is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at 
each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.
NOTE 21 DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES	
	
	
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Recognised deferred tax assets/(liabilities)
Deferred tax assets are attributable to the following:
Tax loss carry forward
23.3
18.4
Property, plant and equipment 
(5.9)
(5.5)
Intangibles
(24.6)
(26.6)
Provisions, accruals and other liabilities
2.2
1.3
Equity-settled share-based payments
1.3
0.2
Trade and other receivables including contract assets
8.4
7.4
Lease liability
1.6
2.1
Total deferred tax (liability)/asset
6.3
(2.7)
The movement in temporary differences has been recognised in profit or loss. Deferred tax assets have been recognised at 
rates between 26% to 30% to reflect the tax rates applicable for our foreign subsidiaries. 	
	
	
	

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 97
PAGE 96 
Movement in temporary differences during the year:	
Movements - Consolidated
Balance 
2023
Recognised in 
Profit or Loss
Under/(Over) 
from prior 
periods
Currency 
Translations
Effective tax 
rate change
Balance 
2024
$M's
$M's
$M's
$M’s
$M’s
$M's
Tax loss carry forward
18.4
2.5
2.4
-
-
23.3
Property, plant and equipment
(5.5)
1.4
(1.6)
(0.2)
-
(5.9)
Intangibles
(26.6)
(1.2)
1.8
1.4
-
(24.6)
Provision, accruals and other 
liabilities
1.3
(0.4)
1.3
-
-
2.2
Equity-settled share-based 
payments
0.2
1.0
-
0.1
-
1.3
Trade and other receivables 
including contracts assets
7.4
0.9
0.1
-
-
8.4
Lease liability
2.1
(0.5)
(0.1)
0.1
-
1.6
Total
(2.7)
3.7
3.9
1.4
-
6.3
Movements - Consolidated
Balance 
2022
Recognised in 
Profit or Loss
Under/(Over) 
from prior 
periods
Acquired 
in Business 
combinations
Currency 
Translations
Balance 
2023
$M's
$M's
$M's
$M’s
$M’s
$M's
Tax loss carry forward
13.0
3.1
2.3
-
-
18.4
Property, plant and equipment
(3.9)
(0.9)
(0.3)
(0.1)
(0.3)
(5.5)
Intangibles
(23.9)
2.3
(2.2)
(1.4)
(1.4)
(26.6)
Provision, accruals and other 
liabilities
1.7
(1.0)
0.5
-
0.1
1.3
Equity-settled share-based 
payments
0.7
(0.3)
(0.2)
-
-
0.2
Trade and other receivables 
including contracts assets
5.5
0.6
0.8
0.2
0.3
7.4
Lease liability
1.6
0.4
-
-
0.1
2.1
Total
(5.3)
4.2
0.9
(1.3)
(1.2)
(2.7)
	
	
	
	
The New Zealand EROAD tax group consists of EROAD Limited, EROAD New Zealand Limited and EROAD Financial Services 
Limited. Losses incurred within this group are transferred within the group with no compensation being recognised. Deferred 
tax assets have been recognised in respect of these items as based on the expected profitability of the New Zealand Tax 
Group as it is considered that future taxable profit will be available for utilisation against the carried forward losses. Coretex 
New Zealand Limited are currently not part of the tax group however it will be considered for inclusion in the New Zealand tax 
group in the future.            	
	
	
	
Determining the extent to which losses will be utilised requires judgement. The Group has forecast expected utilisation of 
tax losses taking into account Group‘s tax planning strategy. Key assumptions included total contracted units, revenue and 
expense forecasts in line with Group budget and three-year forecast supported by a robust strategic and business planning 
process.	 	
	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 21 DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (CONTINUED)
The results of the forecasting indicate that there will be sufficient profitability within the New Zealand tax group and Coretex 
New Zealand to utilise the existing tax losses taking into account the Group‘s tax planning strategies. Losses incurred in recent 
years have been the result of a large investment creating the North American market. The Group expect to be able to report 
significant improvements in profitability over the next three years as the business reaches a sufficiently large subscriber base 
to self-fund operating and corporate costs. Due to the cumulative subscription nature of our business model as well as certain 
operating expenses that do not scale at the same rate of unit and revenue growth, the business is expected to be able to 
achieve its forecast growth in profitability.	
As at 31 March 2024 the Group has tax losses of $82.9M (2023: $90.2M) that are available indefinitely for offsetting against 
future taxable profits of the entity in which they arose, subject to meeting the relevant tax rules. $8.6M (2023:$25.5M) of tax 
losses are unrecognised due to lack of certainty of recovery.	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 22 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The subsidiaries of the Company are:	 	
	
	
Company
Country of Incorporation Principal activity
Ownership interest
2024
2023
EROAD Financial Services Ltd
New Zealand
Financing activities within 
group
100%
100%
EROAD LTI Trustee Limited
New Zealand
LTI Scheme Trustee
100%
100%
EROAD (Australia) Pty Limited
Australia
Transport Technology & SaaS
100%
100%
EROAD Inc
United States of America
Transport Technology & SaaS
100%
100%
Coretex NZ Limited
New Zealand
Transport Technology & SaaS
100%
100%
Coretex Australia Pty Limited
Australia
Transport Technology & SaaS
100%
100%
Coretex USA Inc
United States of America
Transport Technology & SaaS
100%
100%
Coretex Telematics Limited
Canada
Transport Technology & SaaS
100%
100%
Coretex Limited
New Zealand
Transport Technology & SaaS
100%
100%
Imarda Pty Limited
Australia
Not Trading
100%
100%
Imarda Asia Pte Limited
Singapore
Not Trading
100%
100%
Coretex Telematics Limited
British Columbia
Not Trading
100%
100%
International Telematics Corporation
United States of America
Not Trading
100%
100%
International Telematics Holdings Limited
New Zealand
Not Trading
100%
100%
Other interests of the Company are:
Company
Country of Incorporation Principal activity
Ownership interest
2024
2023
Beyond The Square Ventures Limited
New Zealand
Not Trading
50%
50%
NOTE 21 DEFERRED TAX ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (CONTINUED)

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 99
Key management personnel compensation comprised:	
	
	
	
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Short-term employee benefits
1.6
2.3
Share-based payments
0.1
0.8
1.7
3.1
(a) Loans to key management personnel	
	
	
	
There have been no loans to management personnel.	
	
	
	
(b) Other transactions with key management personnel	
	
	
	
There were no other transactions with key management personnel during the period. From time to time, key management 
personnel of the Group may purchase goods from the Group. 
(c) Remuneration of Non-executive Directors		
	
	
	
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Susan Paterson (Chair)
0.14
0.11
Barry Einsig
0.18
0.16
Sara Gifford 
0.17
0.15
Selwyn Pellett
0.09
0.10
David Green (appointed 1 August 2023)
0.06
-
Cameron Kinloch (appointed 28 March 2024)
-
-
Anthony Gibson (retired 28 July 2023)
0.04
0.11
Graham Stuart (retired 31 March 2024)
0.12
0.15
0.80
0.78
No additional fees were paid to any Directors for consultancy work provided to the Company (2023: None paid).	
(d) Remuneration of Executive Directors	
	
	
	
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Salary and bonus
-
-
Share-based payments
-
-
-
-
No additional fees were paid to an executive director for consultancy work provided to the Company  (2023: None paid).
NOTE 22 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)
PAGE 98 
(e)  Transactions with related parties	
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Streamline Business NZ Limited
0.7
0.8
Kylie Jay
-
-
Admin Army Limited (related party of Streamline Business NZ Limited)
-
0.1
Swaytech Limited
0.1
0.1
0.8
1.0
EROAD Group contracts with Swaytech Limited for marketing services and Streamline Business NZ Limited and Admin Army 
for outsourcing work, the companies have a common director with EROAD.
NOTE 23  CAPITAL COMMITMENTS	
	
	
	
As at 31 March 2024 the Group had confirmed purchase orders open with its third party manufacturer of hardware units 
amounting to $12.2M (2023: $18.4M).	 	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
NOTE 24  CONTINGENT LIABILITIES	 	
	
	
As at 31 March 2024 the Company had no contingent liabilities or assets (2023:$Nil).	
	
	
	
NOTE 25  NET TANGIBLE ASSETS PER SHARE	 	
	
	
	
	
	
	
2024
2023
$M’s
$M’s
Net assets (equity)
303.0
248.8
Less Intangibles
(244.4)
(242.1)
Total net tangible assets
58.6
6.7
Net tangible assets per share ($)
0.32
0.06
The non-GAAP measure above is disclosed for consistency with the information disclosed in EROAD’s results announced 
under the NZX listing rules.	 	
	
	
26  EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO BALANCE DATE		
	
	
There were no events occurring subsequent to balance date which require adjustment to or disclosure in the 
financial statements.	
	
	
	
NOTE 22 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (CONTINUED)

Independent
Auditors Report
PAGE 100 
EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
 
 
 
Independent Auditor’s Report 
To the shareholders of EROAD Limited 
Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements 
Opinion 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements 
of EROAD Limited (the ’company’) and its 
subsidiaries (the 'group') on pages 51 to 99 present 
fairly, in all material respects: 
i. the Group’s financial position as at 31 March 
2024 and its financial performance and cash 
flows for the year ended on that date;  
in accordance with New Zealand Equivalents to 
International Financial Reporting Standards issued 
by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board 
and International Financial Reporting Standards 
issued by the International Accounting Standards 
Board.  
We have audited the accompanying consolidated 
financial statements which comprise: 
— the consolidated statement of financial position 
as at 31 March 2024; 
— the consolidated statements of comprehensive 
income, changes in equity and cash flows for 
the year then ended; and 
— notes, including material accounting policy 
information. 
 Basis for opinion 
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand) (‘ISAs (NZ)’). We 
believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. 
We are independent of the group in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 1 International Code of 
Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) issued by 
the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the International Ethics Standards Board for 
Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence 
Standards) (‘IESBA Code’), and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these 
requirements and the IESBA Code.  
Our responsibilities under ISAs (NZ) are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the 
consolidated financial statements section of our report. 
Our firm has also provided other services to the group in relation to tax compliance, tax advisory and other 
assurance services. Subject to certain restrictions, partners and employees of our firm may also deal with the 
group on normal terms within the ordinary course of trading activities of the business of the group. These matters 
have not impaired our independence as auditor of the group. The firm has no other relationship with, or interest 
in, the group.  
PAGE 101

PAGE 102 
PAGE 103
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2 
 
 Materiality 
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Materiality helped us to determine the 
nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually 
and on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. The materiality for the consolidated financial statements 
as a whole was set at $1.8 million determined with reference to a benchmark of group’s revenue. We chose the 
benchmark because, in our view, this is a key measure of the group’s performance.  
 Key audit matters 
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of 
the consolidated financial statements in the current period. We summarise below those matters and our key audit 
procedures to address those matters in order that the shareholders as a body may better understand the process 
by which we arrived at our audit opinion. Our procedures were undertaken in the context of and solely for the 
purpose of our statutory audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements as a whole and we do not express 
discrete opinions on separate elements of the consolidated financial statements. 
The key audit matter 
How the matter was addressed in our audit 
Revenue recognition 
Refer to Note 2 of the consolidated 
financial statements.  
The Group’s contracts are accounted 
for as a service contract and the 
associated revenues are recognised 
over the contract term.   
We focused on this area because the 
accounting determination of whether 
or not the contract contains a lease 
is a significant judgement and the 
outcome has a significant impact on 
the recognition of profit and loss and 
the financial position. 
 
We assessed the judgement in revenue recognition by performing the 
following procedures: 
— Obtaining Group’s customer contracts and trading terms and 
evaluating whether management’s revenue recognition assessment 
is appropriate and in accordance with relevant financial reporting 
standards; 
— Assessing whether the Group’s customer contract terms and 
conditions meet the definition of service contracts to be recognised 
over time;  
— Reviewing any changes or new contractual terms and conditions 
entered into with new customers during the period to identify any 
potential impact on performance obligations required to satisfy the 
contract;  
— Testing the operating effectiveness of controls in relation to 
customer billings; 
— Selecting a sample of customer contracts to compare the revenue 
recognised to the contractual terms;  
— Checking a sample of customer invoices immediately prior to and 
after year end to ensure revenue is recognised in the correct 
period; and  
— Challenging management’s assumptions used to determine the 
recoverability of revenue and associated debtor balances. 
We did not identify any matters that indicated that the reported revenue 
is materially misstated. 
PAGE 102 
PAGE 103
EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3 
 
The key audit matter 
How the matter was addressed in our audit 
Capitalisation of Development costs 
Refer to Note 11 of the consolidated 
financial statements. 
The Group has reported 
development assets of $106.0 million 
(2023: $100.4 million). The 
establishment of the development 
asset requires significant judgement 
as to whether a project meets the 
capitalisation criteria, and which 
expenditure is directly attributable to 
the development of such projects.   
In assessing whether a project meets 
the capitalisation criteria we consider 
its technical and economic feasibility, 
intention and ability to develop, use 
or sell the asset.  Roles of 
employees and the nature of 
overhead costs are considered in 
assessing whether they are directly 
attributable to a qualifying project.  
Projects that do not continue to meet 
the capitalisation criteria are written 
off.   
We focused on this area due to the 
quantum of the development costs 
capitalised and judgement involved. 
We assessed the judgements related to capitalised expenditure by 
performing the following procedures: 
— Understanding the nature and background of the activities that are 
capitalised through inquiry of key management personnel;  
— Selecting a sample of projects ensuring they meet the capitalisation 
criteria; 
— Challenging whether costs capitalised during the year were directly 
attributable to development projects; and  
— Selecting a sample of timesheets and recalculating the amount of 
internal costs capitalised based on the hours which staff spent 
developing the asset.  
We did not identify any factors that were materially inconsistent with 
management’s overall conclusions. 
Impairment of non-current assets 
Refer to Note 11 of the consolidated 
financial statements. 
The non-current assets are allocated 
to three cash generating units 
(‘CGUs’) representing the three core 
markets the Group develops and 
markets its products for (New 
Zealand, Australia and North 
America).   
Goodwill has been allocated to each 
of these CGUs, and as a result the 
carrying value of each CGU must be 
tested for impairment annually.   
The recoverable amounts of the 
CGUs, which have been determined 
based on their value in use, have 
been derived from discounted 
forecast cash flow models. These 
We assessed management’s impairment testing of non-current assets 
by performing the following procedures: 
— Identifying the level at which non-current assets should be tested 
for impairment and assessed the appropriateness of the CGUs 
determined by the Group; 
— Enquiring of the executive management to corroborate an 
understanding of the Group’s products, markets and strategic 
opportunities;   
— Obtaining a value-in-use model for the CGUs and assessing the 
methodology, underlying cash flows and key assumptions made 
including:  
- 
Using our corporate finance specialists to challenge the 
reasonableness of the weighted average cost of capital and 
terminal growth rates;  
- 
Challenging management’s future cash flow forecasts. This 
included comparing previous forecasts to actual results and 
other relevant supporting documentation to evidence the 

EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024
PAGE 104 
PAGE 105
PAGE 104 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4 
 
The key audit matter 
How the matter was addressed in our audit 
models use several key 
assumptions, including estimates of 
future contracted units and average 
rate per unit (‘ARPU’), operating 
costs, terminal value growth rates 
and the weighted-average cost of 
capital (discount rate) relevant to 
each market. 
The impairment testing of non-
current assets is considered to be a 
key audit matter due to the 
complexity of the accounting 
requirements and the significant 
judgement required in determining 
the assumptions used to estimate 
the recoverability of these assets.  
In addition to the above, the carrying 
amount of the Group’s net assets as 
at 31 March 2024 of $293.6 million 
exceeds its market capitalisation of 
$151.6 million and is considered an 
indicator of impairment. 
feasibility of the forecasts and to assess the reliability of 
historical forecasting;  
— Challenging management’s forecasts by performing sensitivity 
analysis of the forecast unit sales growth, ARPU, and discount 
rates; and 
— Evaluating the estimate of the recoverable amount of the Group as 
a whole, including all corporate costs and related corporate assets. 
We did not identify any factors that were materially inconsistent with 
management’s overall conclusions. 
 
 Other information 
The Directors, on behalf of the group, are responsible for the other information included in the entity’s Annual 
Report. Other information includes the Chairman’s and Chief Executive’s report, disclosures relating to corporate 
governance and other statutory disclosures. Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover 
any other information and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.  
In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements our responsibility is to read the other 
information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated 
financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears materially misstated. If, based 
on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we 
are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.  
 Use of this independent auditor’s report 
This independent auditor’s report is made solely to the shareholders as a body. Our audit work has been 
undertaken so that we might state to the shareholders those matters we are required to state to them in the 
independent auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or 
assume responsibility to anyone other than the shareholders as a body for our audit work, this independent 
auditor’s report, or any of the opinions we have formed.   
PAGE 105
 
 
 
 
 
 
5 
 
 Responsibilities of the Directors for the consolidated 
financial statements 
The Directors, on behalf of the company, are responsible for: 
— the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally 
accepted accounting practice in New Zealand (being New Zealand Equivalents to International Financial 
Reporting Standards) and International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the New Zealand 
Accounting Standards Board; 
— implementing necessary internal control to enable the preparation of a consolidated set of financial 
statements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and 
— assessing the ability to continue as a going concern. This includes disclosing, as applicable, matters related 
to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless they either intend to liquidate or to 
cease operations or have no realistic alternative but to do so. 
 Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated 
financial statements 
Our objective is: 
— to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material 
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and 
— to issue an independent auditor’s report that includes our opinion. 
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance 
with ISAs NZ will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. 
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error. They are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they 
could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these 
consolidated financial statements. 
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of these consolidated financial statements is located at 
the External Reporting Board (XRB) website at: 
http://www.xrb.govt.nz/standards-for-assurance-practitioners/auditors-responsibilities/audit-report-1/ 
This description forms part of our independent auditor’s report. 
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditor's report is Aaron Woolsey.  
For and on behalf of 
 
KPMG Auckland 
23 May 2024 
 
EROAD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2024

Governance 
Report
PAGE 106 
PAGE 107
EROAD GOVERNANCE REPORT 2024
EROAD’s board of directors (“Board”) and management are committed 
to responsible governance as we strive to deliver intelligence you can 
trust, for a better world tomorrow. We do this by ensuring that the 
Company adheres to best practice governance principles and maintains 
the highest ethical standards. 
In this Corporate Governance Statement we describe how 
the Board goes about governing EROAD, key actions and 
work-streams undertaken during the year, our approach 
to the alignment of purpose, values, culture and strategy, 
and our engagement with stakeholders. It is structured to 
follow the NZX Corporate Governance Code dated 1 April 
2023 (NZX Code) and discloses the Company’s practices 
for each of the NZX Code’s eight governance principles. 
The Board considers that, during the financial year ended 
31 March 2024, EROAD’s corporate governance structures, 
practices and processes have followed all recommendations 
in the NZX Code. We have also set goals for FY25, reflecting 
matters that are a priority to the Board and will be reflected 
in the work programme we undertake during the new 
financial year. 
The Company complies with the corporate governance 
requirements of the NZX Listing Rules (“NZX Listing Rules”) 
and with our obligations as a foreign-exempt issuer on 
the ASX (“ASX Listing Rules”). EROAD is incorporated in 
New Zealand. As an ASX foreign exempt issuer, EROAD 
needs to comply with the NZX Listing Rules (other than as 
waived by the NZX) but does not need to comply with the 
vast majority of the ASX Listing Rule obligations. EROAD’s 
corporate governance policies, practices and procedures 
can be found on our public investor website at http://www.
eroadglobal.com/global/investors/ (“Investor Website”). 
This Corporate Governance Statement was approved by the 
Board on 22 May 2024.
PRINCIPLE 1: ETHICAL STANDARDS
Grounded in our core values of “we do what’s right”, “we 
play as a team”, “we learn & grow” and “we get it done”, 
the Board recognises the importance of upholding high 
ethical standards and behaviours for sound corporate 
governance. To achieve this, EROAD has a number of 
corporate governance policies that set out our standards 
and expectations for ethical behaviour. These are explained 
in further detail below and are available via our Investor 
Website.  
Code of Ethics 
The Company’s Code of Ethics sets out the core ethical 
principles by which the directors, employees, independent 
contractors, and advisers of EROAD and our related 
companies (“EROADers”) are expected to conduct 
themselves.
These principles drive a vibrant EROAD culture: full 
commitment to success, fostering constructive relationships, 
offering career growth, consulting on important matters and 
embracing EROAD’s values to achieve its purpose. The Code 
of Ethics also covers, amongst other things: confidentiality; 
conflicts of interest; receipt of gifts and personal benefits; 
expected conduct; whistleblowing; anti-bribery; reporting 
breaches of the code of ethics, other policies, or the law.  
All staff receive training on EROAD’s Code of Ethics as 
part of the onboarding process and thereafter, training is 
provided periodically on key aspects of the Code through 
company-wide campaigns and within team projects. In FY24, 
EROAD has delivered annual listed business training, privacy, 
security and health & safety. EROAD provides training on the 
Company’s whistleblower policy every 2-3 years to ensure 
everyone understands the expected standard of behaviours 
and the avenues that are available should a concern arise. 
Significant emphasis was placed on ensuring clear and 
consistent communication across all regions while updates 
to the Company‘s learning management system are made 
as part of an extensive policy review initiative. The approach 
reinforces the Code of Ethics as an integral part of EROAD‘s 
corporate culture, beyond a periodic training exercise. The 
Board expects the immediate reporting of any incidents 
related to the Code , underscoring its commitment to ethical 
conduct at all levels within the organisation.
Our in-house legal team provide advice and assistance to 
the business globally on how to comply with our various 
legal obligations. Engagement with external legal counsel is 
sought as and when required. 

PAGE 108 
PAGE 109
EROAD GOVERNANCE REPORT 2024
Code of Conduct 
Several other policies and documents are regarded as being 
important in ensuring high ethical standards are maintained. 
This includes EROAD’s Code of Conduct which sets out 
EROAD’s purpose, values, and culture. Our Code of Conduct 
further discusses, amongst other things, personal behaviour, 
workplace stress, responsibilities and privacy matters.  
Financial product dealing policies 
EROAD‘s Market Disclosure Policy sets out the Company’s 
commitment to the promotion of investor confidence by 
ensuring that the trading of EROAD shares takes place 
in an efficient, competitive and informed market. This is 
supported by EROAD‘s Securities Trading Policy. Our 
Securities Trading Policy clearly sets out when directors and 
employees of EROAD may buy or sell the Company’s shares, 
and the approvals that are required prior to trading. The 
underlying principle of the Policy is that EROAD is committed 
to ensuring our directors, officers, employees and advisers 
do not trade EROAD shares while in possession of inside 
information.  
Conflict of interest policies 
An Interests Register is kept in accordance with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 1993 (“Companies Act”) 
and the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (“FMC Act”)
to ensure all relevant transactions and matters involving 
the Directors and Senior Managers are recorded. EROAD‘s 
Related Party Transactions Policy governs any proposed or 
actual related party transactions. 
Whistle-blower Policy 
The Company‘s Whistle-Blower Policy complements the 
Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct by providing a clear 
process for reporting any serious issues, aligning with 
the relevant legislation such as the Protected Disclosures 
(Protection of Whistleblowers) Act 2022 (New Zealand), 
Corporations Act 2001 (Australia) and the Whistleblower 
Protection Act of 1989 (United States).  
EROADers can report concerns with their manager or any 
member of the executive team, with major issues escalated 
to the Board. An independent whistle-blower service, 
managed by Deloitte, offers another avenue for reporting, 
ensuring anonymity through webform, email or toll-free 
phone lines.  Should any serious concern be raised, the Board 
and management will work with the appropriate parties to 
swiftly resolve the issue.  
Modern Slavery Policy 
EROAD’s FY24 Modern Slavery Statement will be available 
on our Investor Website and is lodged annually in the 
Australian Modern Slavery Statements Register. Sustainability 
is key to our ethical business practices, and we are fully 
committed to our sustainability goals.  
PRINCIPLE 2: BOARD COMPOSITION AND 
PERFORMANCE
Responsibilities of the Board and Executive Management  
The business and affairs of EROAD are managed under the 
direction of the Board, who are elected by shareholders to 
protect and enhance the value of EROAD’s assets in the best 
interests of shareholders. 
The Board is responsible for corporate governance and 
operates under a written Board Charter detailing its 
authority, responsibilities, membership and protocols. The 
key responsibilities of the Board include setting the overall 
direction and strategy of the Company (in consultation with 
Co-CEOs), reviewing and approving budgets and business 
plans, establishing appropriate policies and guiding and 
monitoring performance of management.  The Board Charter 
also sets out, amongst other things, the following Board 
responsibilities: 
•	 appointment or reappointment of a Chair or director; 
•	 appointing or removing either or both of the Co-CEOs and 
other key senior management appointments; 
•	 advancing major strategies for achieving EROAD’s 
objectives,  
•	 overseeing implementation of EROAD’s sustainability 
strategy;  
•	 setting risk framework for the management of risks;  
•	 reviewing and approving remuneration policies; 
•	 specific responsibilities for safety and wellbeing matters as 
set out in the Charter. 
The Board uses committees to address certain issues that 
require detailed consideration by members of the Board who 
have specialist knowledge and experience. If circumstances 
arise where a director needs to obtain independent advice, 
that director is, as a matter of practice, able to seek such 
advice at the expense of EROAD. 
Management of the day-to-day operations and 
responsibilities of EROAD together with delivery of the 
strategic direction and goals is delegated to the executive 
management team under the leadership of the Co-
CEOs. The Board holds management accountable for the 
performance of our delegated functions. In doing so the 
Board constructively challenges management’s proposals 
and decisions and seeks to instil a culture of accountability 
throughout the Group. This is achieved by monitoring 
management’s performance by receiving reports and plans, 
maintaining an active programme of engagement with 
senior management and through the Board’s annual work 
programme. 
The Board regularly reviews and assesses EROAD’s 
governance structures, policies, and procedures to ensure 
these are in line with best practice and legal requirements, 
safeguarding the interests of shareholders while maximising 
value. The Board Charter was last updated in March 2024 to 
reflect the Co-CEO arrangement and to acknowledge Board’s 
responsibility for overseeing EROAD’s sustainability strategy. 
In FY25 EROAD intends to continue its efforts and focus on 
repositioning the business, driving operational leverage and 
a pathway to growth. With a refreshed Board, new Co-CEO 
partnership model, and a revised committee structure, 
the Board will continue to focus its efforts on ensuring 
performance outcomes are achieved. 
Board Composition 
EROAD is committed to ensuring that the Board comprises 
directors who collectively bring an appropriate mix of skills, 
commitment, experience, expertise, and diversity to Board 
decision-making.
As at 31 March 2024, EROAD’s Board comprised 7 directors, 
all of whom were non-executive directors. Selwyn Pellett 
was the only non-independent director. A brief biography 
of each current Board member, including experience, length 
of service, expertise, role, and the term of office is set out 
in the “The Board” section of this report. Disclosure on 
director shareholdings and other directorships is included on 
pages 143 of this report. During FY24, the Board underwent 
a process of renewal, marked by the addition of two new 
independent non-executive directors. David Green, based 
in New Zealand, joined the Board in August 2023, while 
Cameron Kinloch, based in California, joined the Board on 
28 March 2024. Conversely, Graham Stuart resigned from 
the Board at the end of the fiscal year, aligning with his 
earlier indications in July 2023. Additionally, Tony Gibson 
retired following the 2023 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, in 
accordance with the EROAD Board guidelines on director 
rotation. The Board thanks Tony and Graham for their 
invaluable service to EROAD and its shareholders. 
With completion of the recent Board renewal, the Board 
believes that its membership remains diverse, well-informed, 
and equipped to guide the Company towards achieving its 
strategic goals.
Director Evaluation, Appointment, and Re-Election 
The procedure for the appointment and removal of 
directors is ultimately governed by the Company’s 
Constitution and relevant NZX Listing Rules. A director 
may be appointed by the Board, nomination and 
appointment at an annual or special shareholders’ 
meeting, or as an alternate director. EROAD’s Board may 
appoint a director to fill a vacancy or as an addition to 
the existing directors. Any director appointed by the 
Board must submit himself or herself for appointment 
by shareholders at the next annual meeting following his 
or her appointment by the Board. Directors are subject 
to the rotation requirements set out in the NZX Listing 
Rules. 
The Board plays an active role in appointing new 
directors and, during FY24, has established a 
Nominations Committee to assist in the selection, 
appointment, and reappointment of directors to the 
Board. For the purposes of Recommendation 3.4 of 
the Code, the Board has determined that the whole 
Board will carry out the functions of the Nominations 
Committee due to the small size of the Board. 
The Appointment and Selection of New Directors 
Policy outlines the criteria and procedures for selecting 
and recommending new or reappointed directors and 
is available on the Investor Website. Additionally, the 
Committee oversees EROAD’s broader human resources 
strategy. Detailed responsibilities of the Committee 
are set out in the Nominations Committee Charter, 
accessible via the Investor Website.  
In line with the NZX Code Recommendations, checks 
are made for any material adverse information before a 
candidate is recommended to the Board for election or 
re-election. Where appropriate, external consultants are 
engaged to assist in searching for candidates. Where 
a candidate is recommended by the Nominations 
Committee, the Board assesses that candidate against 
a range of criteria including background, experience, 
professional qualifications, personal qualities, the 
potential for the candidate’s skills to augment the 
existing Board (board skills matrix) and the candidate’s 
availability to commit to the Board’s activities. The 
Board includes in the Notice of Meeting for annual 
meetings all material information that is considered 
relevant to a decision on whether shareholders should 
elect or re-elect a director. At EROAD’s FY23 Annual 
Shareholders’ Meeting, Barry Einsig retired by rotation 
and being eligible, offered himself for re-election and 
was re-elected to the Board.  

1 Includes Graham Stuart who has since stepped down from the Board.   
PAGE 110 
PAGE 111
EROAD GOVERNANCE REPORT 2024
All new directors enter into a written agreement with EROAD, 
which sets out the terms of their appointment. New directors 
complete a comprehensive induction programme that 
enables them to meet with the Chair, other directors and the 
senior management team to gain insight into EROAD’s values 
and culture, our business operations, key risks and regulatory 
and legal framework. The program also includes site visits. 
Each director’s induction program is tailored based on the 
director’s existing skills, knowledge, and experience. 
The Board’s commitment to identifying suitable candidates 
with the right skillset led to the appointment of David Green 
in August 2023 and Cameron Kinloch in March 2024. David 
has extensive strategic and governance experience in the 
finance and banking sectors and Cameron brings deep Board 
governance experience, as well as targeted expertise and 
experience with high growth companies. 
Board Skills 
All directors are expected to maintain the skills required to 
discharge their obligations to the Company. On an ongoing 
basis, directors are provided with papers, presentations and 
briefings on matters which may affect EROAD’s business or 
operations to assist the directors regarding understanding 
key developments in the industry in which EROAD operates. 
Directors are also encouraged to undertake continuing 
education and training relevant to the discharge of their 
obligations as directors of the Company. 
The Board considers that Barry Einsig and Selwyn Pellett 
have transport industry specific experience. Susan Paterson, 
David Green and Cameron Kinloch bring listed company and 
financial/risk experience. Sara Gifford, Barry Einsig, Selwyn 
Pellett and Cameron Kinloch have extensive experience in 
technology solutions. Overall, the Board’s skill set is as set out 
in the following table.
BUSINESS CONTEXT
CAPABILITY
KEY ELEMENT
CURRENT BOARD
A depth of industry 
experience and awareness 
of sector trends
Executive industry 
experience
Modern executive telematic hardware experience 
Hardware R&D
Product software
Fleet management or adjacent software development
Data-driven innovation and growth
Deep software development experience
Transport and supply 
chain
Strong insight into transport – systems, trends
Fleet management
Supply Chain Regulation Sustainability
Customer perspective
Driving long-term value 
creation through serving 
customer needs
Modern technologist
SaaS businesses
Data analytics / AI
Strong scale tech networks
Modern cloud expertise
Cybersecurity
Key trends in tech sector
Tech go-to-market 
strategy and sales
Sales channel leadership experience – digital and 
enterprise selling 
Customer-centric strategies identifying new growth 
opportunities 
Building world-class sales capability
Go-to-market strategy
Driving revenue growth – beyond $1bn
Digital product 
marketing
Tech sector marketing
Building customer insight
Brand development
Key customer 
segment insight
New Zealand
North America
Australia
BUSINESS CONTEXT
CAPABILITY
KEY ELEMENT
CURRENT BOARD
Scaling experience to guide 
EROAD growth towards a 
$1b company
Scale software 
Company
Scaling a technology or SaaS organisation
– beyond $1b
Growth strategy development and execution
Capital market leadership
Investment
Direct exposure to investments in technology 
companies that have successfully scaled
M&A / takeovers
Long-term value creation
Finance / investment community insight
Technology 
infrastructure
Scale IT infrastructure
Technology trends
Technology risk
Supporting financial and 
culture growth as scale and 
complexity builds
Finance
Former CFO / CA / ARC Chair expertise Financial 
strategy (tech)
Financial reporting and regulations
Risk management
People and 
compensation
Corporate culture and diversity & inclusion
Executive compensation experience 
Employee engagement
Performance and talent
H&S
Driving best practice in 
governance and strategic 
leadership
Listed governance
Scale public company governance experience - NZX, 
ASX, NASDAQ ESG
Shareholder engagement and partnering
Chair succession potential
Demographic 
diversity
Gender, ethnicity, age
Key
High capability
Moderate capability
The Board also believes that the tenure of each of its members is important as it seeks to balance independent, 
institutional knowledge gained through length of service and the importance of fresh perspectives in decision-making. 
The Board does not have a tenure policy, but it is of the view that the profile, represented by the length of service of 
each of our directors and as set out in the following table, is appropriately balanced such that Board succession and 
renewal planning is managed over the medium to longer term. As at 31 March 2024, the Board’s tenure was as follows:
Director tenure as at 31 March 2024 
0-3 years
3-9 years1
Number of directors
4
3

PAGE 112 
PAGE 113
EROAD GOVERNANCE REPORT 2024
Independence of Directors  
The factors that are considered by the Board when assessing 
the independence of our directors are set out in the Board 
Charter read together with the NZX Code. The guidance 
provided in the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and 
Recommendations is also considered.  
As set out in the Board Charter, read together with the NZX 
Code, factors that may impact a director’s independence 
include: 
1.	 Is currently, or was within the last three years, employed in 
an executive role by the issuer, or any of its subsidiaries;  
2.	Is currently deriving, or within the last 12 months derived a 
substantial portion of his, her or their annual revenue from 
the issuer;  
3.	Is currently or was within the last 12 months, in a senior role 
in a provider of material professional services (other than an 
external auditor) to the issuer or any of its subsidiaries;  
4.	Is currently, or was within the last three years, employed by 
the external auditor to the issuer, or any of its subsidiaries;  
5.	Currently has, or did have within the last three years, 
a material business relationship (e.g. as a supplier or 
customer) with the issuer or any of its subsidiaries;  
6.	Is a substantial product holder of the issuer, or a senior 
manager of, or person otherwise associated with, a 
substantial product holder of the issuer;  
7.	 Is currently, or was within the last three years, in a material 
contractual relationship with the issuer or any of its 
subsidiaries, other than as a director;  
8.	Has close family ties or personal relationships (including 
close social or business connections) with anyone in the 
categories listed above;  
9.	Has been a director of the entity for a period of 12 years or 
more. 
In each case, the materiality of the interest, position, 
association or relationship needs to be assessed to determine 
whether it might interfere, or might reasonably be seen to 
interfere, with the director’s capacity to bring an independent 
judgment to bear on issues before the Board, to act in the 
best interests of EROAD, and to represent the interests of 
our financial product holders generally. The Board reviews 
the independence of each Director considering interests that 
each director is required to disclose in relation to the factors 
set out above. 
Based on these factors, as well as the guidance provided in 
the relevant Codes, EROAD considers that, as at 31 March 
2024, Susan Paterson (Chair), Graham Stuart, Barry Einsig, 
David Green, Sara Gifford and Cameron Kinloch were 
independent directors. 
While the Board considers Selwyn Pellett to be a Non-
Independent Director, primarily given his former position as 
CEO of Coretex (and associated relationships with Coretex-
related subsidiaries), EROAD believes Selwyn’s position 
on the Board is essential for execution on our technology 
strategy.  
There is a comprehensive conflict management framework in 
place to ensure that Selwyn’s actions do not compromise the 
interests of the Company or its shareholders. The framework 
includes measures such as disclosure requirements, recusal 
from decision-making processes and regular evaluations.  
The Board considers that both Mr Heine and Mr Kenneson as 
Co-CEOs are both sufficiently independent of the Chair.
Diversity and Inclusion  
EROAD is committed to ensuring that we have a diverse 
and inclusive organisation. The Board recognises that 
diversity and inclusion lead to a better experience at work for 
EROAD’s employees, makes teams stronger, leads to greater 
creativity and performance, contributes to a more meaningful 
relationship with customers and stakeholders, and, ultimately, 
increases value to shareholders. When there is a variety of 
thinking styles, backgrounds, experiences, perspectives and 
abilities, employees are more able to understand customers’ 
needs and to respond effectively to them. 
As at the time of publication of this report, the Board is 
pleased to have female representation of 50% on the Board 
with 3 directors based in New Zealand and 3 directors based 
in the United States. 
To ensure continued focus and prioritisation, the Diversity 
and Inclusion Policy, available on the Investor Website, 
requires the Board to set, review and report on measurable 
objectives for achieving and promoting diversity across 
EROAD’s business. Implementation of actions to achieve 
the objectives is the responsibility of the Co-CEOs and Chief 
People Officer.  
The Company considers age, cultural background and 
geographic location as diversity metrics and we continue to 
build on our internal reporting capabilities to provide greater 
visibility to inform and promote effective change. Diversity 
and Inclusion efforts are governed by the People & Culture 
Committee and are explained in more detail in the ‘Our 
People’ section of this report. 
Gender composition  
The table below shows the respective number of men and 
women on the Board, in executive management positions (as 
“Officers”) and across the whole organisation, including both 
full time and part time employees, as at 31 March 2023 and 31 
March 2024. 
2023
Women
Men
Gender 
diverse/
gender not 
declared 
Board
2 (33%) 
4 (66%)
-
Officers
3 (33%)
6 (66%)
-
Other employees
170 (35%)
307 (63%)
7(1%)
2024
Women
Men
Gender 
diverse/
gender not 
declared 
Board
3 (43%) 
4 (57%)
-
Officers
2 (22%)
7 (78%)
-
Other employees
164 (35%)
294 (62%)
13(3%)
“Officers” are the Co-CEOs and senior executives reporting 
directly to either or both of the Co-CEOs.
Board Performance 
Performance evaluations for the Board, the Board’s 
committees, individual directors, and executives are 
undertaken regularly.
The Board Charter requires the Board to undertake a regular 
performance evaluation of itself that: 
•	 compares the performance of the Board with the 
requirements of our Charter; 
•	 reviews the performance of the Board’s committees and 
individual directors; and 
•	 makes improvements to the Board Charter where 
considered appropriate.
As part of the Board review process, an independent 
third party is appointed to review the Board performance 
periodically. The review conducted in FY22 included, for the 
first time, an ESG component. Key areas of focus include 
supporting the onboarding of a new CEO and two new 
directors, execution of EROAD’s strategic plan, and ensuring 
Board materials are focused at the right strategic level. Self-
assessments are undertaken by the Board from time to time 
as an alternative to the independent evaluation. 
Following the successful completion of the Board‘s renewal 
in FY24, the Board plans to conduct another performance 
evaluation in FY25.
Company Secretary  
Ksenija Chobanovich is EROAD‘s Company Secretary. She 
was accountable to the Board, through the Chair, on all 
matters to do with the proper functioning of the Board 
throughout FY24. Ms. Chobanovich had regular discussions 
with the Chair to manage the flow of information between 
EROAD’s Board, our committees, and senior executives. 
She was responsible for all aspects of legal and regulatory 
compliance at EROAD. 
EROAD has been a party to one employment-related 
legal action in FY24. Ms. Chobanovich is not aware of any 
pending actions regarding anti-competitive behaviour and 
violations of anti-trust and monopoly legislation. EROAD 
has not identified any non-compliance with any laws and/
or regulations, nor has the Company been subject to 
any significant fines or non-monetary sanctions for non-
compliance with any laws and/or regulations in the social and 
economic area.
PRINCIPLE 3: BOARD COMMITTEES
The Board has established four key committees: 
•	 Finance, Risk and Audit; 
•	 Nominations;   
•	 People & Culture; and  
•	 Technology.  
In FY24, EROAD’s Remuneration, Talent and Nomination 
Committee (“RTNC”) was split into the newly formed 
Nominations Committee and People & Culture Committee.
These focused committees were established to enhance 
efficiency in addressing Board matters. EROAD’s Board 
committees collaborate closely with management and 
advisers, providing detailed insights and recommendations 
to the Board. The committees’ charters, accessible on the 
Investor Website, set out their objectives, procedures, 
composition, and responsibilities. 
All directors have a standing invitation to attend committee 
meetings where there is no conflict of interest. The purpose 
and composition of each committee is described below:

2 All Board members are members of the NC.
3 Susan Paterson attended Board, FRAC, NC  and PCC meetings as a member for FY24. Susan Paterson was the Chair of FRAC until 10 July 2023 when she assumed 
the role of Board Chair.
4 Graham Stuart attended Board, FRAC, NC and PCC meetings as a member for FY24. Mr Stuart was the Chair of FRAC from 10 July 2023 until 20 February 2024.
5 Barry Einsig attended Board, NC, PCC and TC meetings as a member for FY24. Mr Einsig was the Chair of TC.
6 Sara Gifford attended Board, NC, PCC and TC meetings as a member for FY24. Ms Gifford was the Chair of PCC from 19 September 2023.
7 Selwyn Pellett attended Board, NC and TC meetings as a member for FY24. Mr Pellett joined the FRAC from September 2023 and attended meetings as a 
member for the remainder of FY24.
8 David Green joined the Board on 1 August 2023. Mr Green attended NC and FRAC meetings as a member from the date of his appointment to the Board. Mr Green 
was the Chair of FRAC from 20 February 2024.
9 Tony Gibson attended Board and FRAC meetings as a member prior to his retirement following the 2023 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting on 28 July 2024.
10 Cameron Kinloch was appointed to the Board on 28 March 2024 and was therefore not eligible to attend any meetings of the Board or its Committees 
during FY24. 
PAGE 114 
PAGE 115
EROAD GOVERNANCE REPORT 2024
Finance, Risk and Audit Committee (“FRAC”) 
The Finance, Risk and Audit Committee plays a pivotal role 
in overseeing EROAD’s risk management, internal controls, 
financial reporting integrity and the auditing processes and 
activities. Four meetings of the Finance, Risk and Audit 
Committee were held during the year ended 31 March 2024. 
According to the committee’s Charter, it must be comprised 
of non-executive directors, the majority of whom must be 
independent. Further, the Chair of the committee must be an 
independent director and cannot be the Chair of the Board. 
Employees only attend the Finance, Risk and Audit 
Committee meetings at the invitation of the committee. In 
the year ended 31 March 2024, Co-CEO, Mark Heine, the Chief 
Financial Officer (“CFO”) and General Counsel were invited 
to attend each of the four meetings of the Finance, Risk 
and Audit Committee. Co-CEO David Kenneson was invited 
to attend the one meeting that took place during FY24 
following his appointment in March 2024. 
The members of the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee as 
at 31 March 2024 were David Green (Chair), Susan Paterson, 
Graham Stuart, Selwyn Pellett and Cameron Kinloch. At the 
beginning of FY24, Susan Paterson chaired the Finance, Risk 
and Audit Committee until her appointment as Board Chair 
on 10 July 2023, at which point Graham Stuart assumed the 
role of Finance, Risk and Audit Committee Chair. David Green 
was the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee Chair from 20 
February 2024. The majority of members of the Finance, 
Risk and Audit Committee are independent non-executive 
directors. Qualifications and experience of the Committee 
members is outlined on page 46 of this Annual Report. 
The Chair of the Committee reported to the Board on the 
Committee’s proceedings following each meeting.
Nominations Committee (“NC”) 
The Nominations Committee assists the Board in fulfilling 
its responsibilities to shareholders with respect to Board 
performance, Board composition, Board succession planning 
and the selection and appointment of Directors. For the 
purposes of Recommendation 3.4 of the Code, the Board has 
determined that the whole Board will carry out the functions 
of the Nominations Committee due to the small size of 
the Board, with the Board Chair chairing this Committee. 
A quorum of four directors is required in accordance with 
the Nominations Committee Charter. Two meetings of the 
Nominations Committee were held during the year following 
its formation in September 2023.  
The majority of members of the Nominations Committee are 
independent, non-executive directors. 
People & Culture Committee (“PCC”)  
As stated above, in FY24, the RTNC was split into the newly 
formed Nominations Committee and People & Culture 
Committee. The members of RTNC were Tony Gibson (Chair), 
Susan Paterson, Barry Einsig, Sara Gifford and Selwyn Pellett. 
There were no RTNC meetings held during FY24, due to its 
bifurcation. 
The People & Culture Committee was established to assist 
the Board in overseeing EROAD’s culture, values and 
leadership; health, safety, environment and wellbeing maters; 
remuneration and organisational matters; and setting clear 
remuneration policies and practices.  
The current members of the People & Culture Committee 
are Sara Gifford (Chair), David Green and Susan Paterson. 
Qualifications and experience of the Committee members is 
outlined on page 46 of this Annual Report. A quorum for the 
meeting is two directors. The Chair of the Committee reports 
to the Board on the Committee’s proceedings following each 
meeting. All members of the People & Culture Committee are 
independent directors. 
While the Committee met only once since its inception 
in September 2023, to ensure seamless continuity and 
effectiveness, the entire Board convened a dedicated 
meeting during FY24 to carry out the functions of the 
People & Culture Committee. Management only attends the 
People & Culture Committee meetings at the invitation of the 
Committee.
Technology Committee (“TC”) 
The Technology Committee assists the Board in its 
obligations to oversee EROAD‘s digital transformation. The 
Technology Committee assists with product management, 
technology and innovation strategies, technology 
execution plans, and necessary workforce development. 
The Technology Committee also oversees operations 
relating to hardware, product and platform innovation, as 
well as information security, cyber security, data privacy 
and third party technology risk management. Key product 
and ecosystem partners also form part of the Technology 
Committee‘s workstream. The members of EROAD‘s 
Technology Committee are Barry Einsig (Chair), Sara Gifford 
and Selwyn Pellett. Qualifications and experience of the 
Committee members is outlined on page 46 of this Annual 
Report. 
The Committee met 7 times during the year. A quorum for 
the meeting is two independent directors. The Chairperson 
of the Committee reported to the Board on the Committee’s 
proceedings following each meeting. 
Attendance and Board and Committee Meetings
The Board held 7 meetings during the year ended 
31 March 2024.
Board
FRAC
NC2
PCC
TC
Susan Paterson3
7
4
3
1
-
Graham Stuart4 
6
3
2
1
-
Barry Einsig5
7
-
3
-
7
Sara Gifford6
7
-
3
1
7
Selwyn Pellett7 
7
3
3
-
7
David Green8
5
3
3
-
-
Tony Gibson9 
2
1
-
-
-
Cameron Kinloch10
-
-
-
-
-
In addition to the below scheduled Board meetings, the 
Board also had nine calls during the year.

Takeover Protocol 
The Board has a formal written protocol that sets out the 
procedure to be followed in the event that a takeover 
offer is received by EROAD (“Protocol”). The Protocol 
summarises key aspects of takeover preparation, and sets 
out governance, conflict and communications protocols 
for takeover response. This Protocol provides that in the 
event of a takeover offer, the Board Takeover Committee 
would manage EROAD‘s response obligations and make a 
recommendation to the full board.  
During FY24, the Board resolved to appoint a Takeover 
Committee in response to the unsolicited, non-binding 
indicative proposal received from Brillian APAC Pty Ltd 
(„Volaris“) in June 2023 to acquire 100% of EROAD‘s 
shares. The Committee operated in accordance with the 
Independent Directors’ Sub-Committee Charter and was 
Chaired by Graham Stuart. Susan Paterson, Barry Einsig and 
Tony Gibson were the other members of EROAD‘s Takeover 
Committee in FY24. The Takeover Committee met twice 
during FY24. 
PRINCIPLE 4: REPORTING & DISCLOSURE
Marking Timely and Balanced Disclosure 
EROAD is committed to promoting shareholder confidence 
through open, timely and accurate market communication. 
The Company has procedures in place to ensure compliance 
with our disclosure obligations under the NZX Listing Rules 
and the ASX Listing Rules. The Board has a Continuous 
Disclosure Committee that comprises the CEO, CFO (“the 
Disclosure Officers”) and one Independent Director. In the 
absence of either the CEO or CFO then market disclosure 
can be approved by either: 1) two Independent Directors and 
either the CEO or CFO; or 2) one Independent Director, the 
General Counsel and either the CEO or CFO. 
The Continuous Disclosure Committee is responsible 
for administering EROAD’s compliance with our Market 
Disclosure Policy which includes our NZX and ASX 
continuous disclosure obligations. The Disclosure Officers 
will recommend to the Continuous Disclosure Committee 
whether a market disclosure should be made. The Disclosure 
Officers are ultimately responsible for all communications 
with NZX and ASX market regulators. 
Financial Reporting 
EROAD’s Finance, Risk and Audit Committee Charter 
directs the oversight of the quality and integrity of external 
financial reporting including the accuracy, completeness, 
balance and timeliness of financial statements. The FRAC 
reviews interim and annual financial statements and makes 
recommendations to the Board concerning accounting 
policies, areas of judgement, compliance with financial 
reporting standards, NZX, ASX and legal requirements, and 
the results of the external audit. All matters required to be 
addressed and for which the Committee has responsibility 
were addressed during the period under review. 
All interim and full-year financial statements are prepared in 
accordance with relevant financial standards.
Non-Financial Reporting 
Environmental, social and governance factors (“ESG”) are at 
the heart of EROAD’s culture. EROAD’s Chief People Officer 
has formal responsibility for environmental and social topics 
and EROAD’s General Counsel and CFO have an informal 
responsibility for economic, governance related topics. The 
General Counsel and CFO inform the Board of any material 
factors that come to light and keep the Board up to date 
with current market trends and processes in this space. The 
directors are committed to progressing ESG matters and 
consider these at every board meeting. Members of the 
Executive Team report directly to the FRAC on sustainability 
matters as and when they see fit. The Board also takes advice 
from the FRAC, General Counsel, Sustainability Committee 
(lead by the Chief Sustainability Officer), and EROAD‘s 
Engineering Teams.  
As noted in the Remuneration Report, for FY24, up to 25% 
of the short term incentive scheme targets for the executive 
team are based on the achievement of strategic (non-
financial) program targets from the annual plan. 
Our ESG philosophy is set out in our Sustainability Policy 
and our achievements in the sustainability space are further 
detailed in this Annual Report.
Climate-related disclosures 
EROAD is a climate-reporting entity under the FMC 
Act.  EROAD has undertaken significant work in FY24 
to understand the Company’s climate-related risks and 
opportunities, and set metrics and targets in accordance 
with our obligations as a climate-related entity. EROAD 
will publish its first climate-related disclosures for the year 
ended 31 March 2024 in compliance with the Aotearoa New 
Zealand Climate Standards issued by the External Reporting 
Board (XRB) as required by the FMC Act.  EROAD’s climate-
related disclosures for the year ended 31 March 2024 will be 
accessible on our Investor Website on 31 July 2024.
Global Reporting Initiative 
As in previous reporting years, we have continued to report 
against the Global Reporting Initiative (“GRI”) Framework. In 
FY24 we have taken a more targeted approach to reporting 
against the standards material to EROAD. EROAD intends 
to include a GRI index together with it’s climate related 
disclosures to be released on 31 July 2024.
EROAD is pleased to provide reporting on sustainability 
factors throughout this Annual Report. 
PRINCIPLE 5: REMUNERATION 
See the Remuneration Report on page 122of this Annual 
Report which outlines our compliance with Principle 5.
PRINCIPLE 6: RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk Management Framework 
EROAD is committed to the identification, monitoring and 
management of material financial and non-financial risks 
associated with our business activities. The Board ultimately 
has responsibility for internal compliance and control. It 
recognises that a sound culture is fundamental to an effective 
risk management framework. The Company’s purpose, values 
and Code of Ethics are important contributors to instilling 
effective risk management and awareness, and to support 
appropriate behaviours and judgements about risk taking 
within the parameters. EROAD’s risk management framework 
provides for the oversight and management of financial 
and non- financial material business risks, as well as related 
internal systems. The framework is designed to:
•	 optimise the return to, and protect the interests of, 
stakeholders; 
•	 safeguard EROAD’s assets and maintain our reputation; 
•	 improve EROAD’s operating performance; and 
•	 support EROAD’s strategic objectives. 
EROAD’s Risk Management Policy is available via the 
Investor Website. 
EROAD’s risk management strategy enhances strategic 
planning and prioritisation, as well as assisting in 
the achievement of key objectives. The strategy 
also strengthens EROAD’s ability to be agile when 
responding to challenges that may be faced. The risk 
management framework requires senior executives and 
the wider leadership team to review risks against the 
risk limits and triggers in the risk appetite statement 
(“Risk Appetite”) and to update risk registers on a 
periodic basis (“Risk Registers”). The registers identify 
all known risks, including those that are key to EROAD’s 
strategy and business priorities. The Risk Registers 
record risks by impact and probability, and records the 
controls and mitigations for those risks. Risk mitigation 
for high-risk projects must be addressed from inception 
and be supervised by the appropriate executive team 
members. The executive team reviews the Risk Register 
in setting EROAD’s strategy and budgets.  
The Finance, Risk and Audit Committee periodically 
reviews EROAD’s Risk Appetite, the Risk Registers 
and other relevant aspects of the risk management 
framework. In addition, a review is undertaken, with the 
external auditors and management, of the policies and 
procedures in relation to material business risks. The 
Finance, Risk and Audit Committee, in conjunction with 
management, reports to the Board on the effectiveness 
of EROAD’s management of our material business 
risks and whether the risk management framework is 
operating effectively in all material respects. 
In FY24 EROAD identified the following material risks to 
the Company:
 
PAGE 116 
PAGE 117
EROAD GOVERNANCE REPORT 2024

Risk
Risk description and management 
Competition and new 
technologies  
EROAD operates in a competitive telematics industry, especially in North America, facing challenges from 
larger companies and rapid tech advancements.  The potential entry of global operators into new markets like 
New Zealand adds complexity, especially in light of potential regulatory changes to road user charges in New 
Zealand. New competitors and technologies could disrupt EROAD’s existing business model and/or underlying 
technology.
Risk mitigation includes:  
•	 Recent Equity Raise providing EROAD financial flexibility for investments.   
•	 Investment in AI, partnerships and emerging innovative technologies.  
•	 Active involvement in the regulatory change process and focus on opportunities this presents
North America strategy 
execution   
EROAD’s growth in North America is crucial to execution of its strategy. If EROAD is less successful than 
anticipated, this could materially impact EROAD’s financial performance and/or share price.   
Risk management involves:  
•	 adjusting sales strategy by appointing a Co-CEO and EVP of Sales, upskilling team, and hiring experienced 
salespeople throughout FY24-FY26.   
•	 focusing on securing and retaining referenceable enterprise customers.  
Product and platform 
reliability and scalability  
Platform and product stability is crucial for customer satisfaction.  Also, as EROAD grows it needs to ensure that 
its platforms and products are scalable to be able to service many customers, including large enterprises.   
Risk mitigation involves:  
•	 prioritising R&D for reliability and scalability   
•	 investing in third-party providers’ products for scalability and improved functionality.   
•	 North American engineering team in place to respond quickly to customer needs.   
Supply chain efficiency 
and working capital 
management  
EROAD relies on the strength of its relationships with a limited number of suppliers for product and service 
delivery. Due to its modest scale, EROAD has limited negotiating leverage. Balancing inventory to meet 
customer demand without excess stock and ensuring timely customer payments is crucial for management of 
cash flow.  
Risk mitigation includes:   
•	 Maintaining strong relationships with suppliers.   
•	 Focus on improved demand forecasting and debt recovery.  
Cybersecurity
EROAD faces exposure to hacking, cyber-attack or similar due to its online software hosting, Cloud/SaaS 
services revenue model and role as a data processor.  This could lead to substantial disruption in EROAD’s 
operations. 
Risk mitigation involves:  
•	 Business continuity and disaster recovery planning;  
•	 Continuous investment in strengthening the security and resilience of EROAD’s platforms and business 
systems;
•	 Data security awareness training, independent testing, incident management programme, vulnerability 
management, and the like;  
•	 Governance and oversight by the Technology Committee.
Large enterprise customer 
relationships  
Given EROAD’s size and strategic focus on referenceable enterprise customers, the departure of a key marquee 
or enterprise customer could affect revenue and reputation.   
Risk management involves: 
•	 Strengthening relationships through proactive engagement and support.  
•	 Updating the sales strategy to attract more enterprise customers, including adjusting the sales team for 
targeted acquisitions.   
Operational complexity  
EROAD has operations in New Zealand, Australia and North America. As EROAD grows in these markets, the 
complexity of its business increases. 
Risk management involves:  
•	 Initiatives to ensure alignment of processes and customer journeys globally  
•	 Enhanced service level objectives, well defined product delivery operating model, and leveraging new 
technologies to drive efficiencies.
Network shut down and 
hardware replacement  
New Zealand’s 3G network shut down, delayed to 31 March 2025, requires EROAD (and other telematics 
providers) to replace components in telematics solutions for certain customers.  While EROAD products can 
function on the 2G network, it‘s expected this network will also shut down eventually. This replacement process 
can disrupt customers, potentially leading to contract non-renewals or delayed upgrades to 4G. Costs for 
replacement and installations may exceed initial estimates.   
Risk management involves:  
•	 EROAD has a dedicated project (“Project Sunrise”) to manage the transition, swapping out end-of-life units 
with 4G-enabled ones.   
•	 The project is under careful management and regular review, aiming for completion by the end of FY25.   
Key people
EROAD’s business strategy requires us to attract and retain highly skilled talent in a competitive labour market 
globally. Due to EROAD’s size, reliance on a few highly skilled individuals poses a risk of disruption to operations 
due to critical dependencies. 
Risk management involves:  
•	 Succession planning, focus on career development pathways, alternative resourcing options through 
outsourcing and clear organisational processes.  
General economic conditions  
EROAD‘s financial performance is closely tied to economic conditions both locally and globally. An economic 
downturn or recession could lead customers to reduce spending, impacting EROAD’s financial results.   
Risk mitigation includes:  
•	 Leveraging benefits of EROAD’s products to help customers optimise vehicle-relating expenses.   
•	 Maintaining sufficient capital reserves. 
Climate change  
EROAD’s climate change risks will be disclosed in the company’s climate-related disclosures to be released on 
the Investor Website by 31 July 2024
PAGE 118 
PAGE 119
EROAD GOVERNANCE REPORT 2024

Risk Appetite 
In FY24 the EROAD Board and Executive implemented the 
revised Risk Appetite Statement. In light of the Company’s 
renewed strategy, the Risk Appetite Statement was revised 
to ensure a clear focus on generating positive free cash 
flow, whilst maintaining the ability for agile and sustainable 
growth. The Risk Appetite Statement provides guidance to, 
and monitoring of employees, contractors, and suppliers as 
it sets out the amount and type of risk that EROAD is willing 
to accept to meet our strategic objectives and create value 
for our customers and stakeholders. EROAD is strategically 
focused and risk aware, but is not a risk-averse organisation. 
Risks are taken in alignment with EROAD’s strategy, purpose 
and in accordance with the company’s values. EROAD has no 
appetite for risks that do not align with these. 
EROAD has five key risk categories and adopts a different 
risk appetite for each identifiable risk within these categories. 
The five risk categories are:  
•	 Strategy Execution; 
•	 Financial; 
•	 Customer Expectations; 
•	 People; and 
•	 Regulatory & Environmental, Social and Governance 
A summary of EROAD’s risk appetite is set out below.
RISK APPETITE CATEGORIES
Risk Appetite 
Level
Strategy Execution
Financial
Customer 
Expectations
People
Regulatory and 
ESG
Very high
High
Partnerships
Innovation
Learning / 
knowledge
Medium
Capability
Regulatory 
environment
Low
•	 Strategic risk
•	 Strategic 
execution
•	 Free cash flow
•	 Funding model
Key roles & single 
point of failure
Very low
•	 Working capital
•	 Supply chain and 
inventory
•	 Customer 
interactions
•	 Quality and 
resilience
•	 Product delivery
•	 Information and 
cyber security
•	 Privacy
•	 Governance
•	 Environmental 
and Social
No appetite
Covenants
Product compliance
Health & Safety
Legal & regulatory 
risk
In managing the Company’s business risks, the Board 
approves and monitors policy and procedures in areas such 
as treasury management, financial performance, taxation 
and delegated authorities. 
RISK APPETITE LEVELS
The Company regularly reports to the Board on any 
risks that exceed EROAD’s Risk Appetite with mitigation 
plans and updates on how exceeded risks are managed 
and resolved.  
EROAD has assessed its risk appetite categories, metrics, 
triggers, and limits, considering our operational landscape 
and accomplishments thus far. This review is ongoing, and a 
revised Risk Appetite Statement will be developed and rolled 
out during FY25.
Insurance 
EROAD has insurance policies in place covering areas where 
risk to our assets and business can be insured at a reasonable 
cost. 
Health and Safety Risk Management 
Safety and wellbeing is a top priority for the Board, and our 
specific responsibilities are set out in the Board Charter. The 
Board is committed to ensuring that safety and wellbeing 
is embedded into every aspect of EROAD’s business. In 
line with this, EROAD appointed a new Health and Safety 
Manager in FY24. EROAD’s Safety and Wellbeing Policy is 
a management policy that provides for the oversight and 
management of health and safety risks on behalf of the 
Board. 
EROAD’s Safety and Wellbeing Management Framework 
outlines safety and wellbeing activities at EROAD and 
articulates safety and wellbeing responsibilities for the Board, 
the executive team and the people performing work for 
EROAD. The framework requires objectives and key results 
to be established and incorporated into business planning 
processes to enable the Safety and Wellbeing Policy’s intent 
and related strategies and procedures to be achieved. The 
framework also requires the safety and wellbeing strategy 
to be reviewed every three years to ensure alignment with 
EROAD’s values, the overall business strategy and the safety 
and wellbeing vision.  
At each Board meeting, members of the Board are provided 
with a safety and wellbeing report summarising EROAD’s 
risk profile and management actions, the current safety and 
wellbeing focus, lead and lag indicators and updates from the 
Safety and Wellbeing staff committee. In the year ended 31 
March 2024, there have been no notifiable events to report to 
WorkSafe NZ or WorkSafe Australia and no notifiable events 
reported to US authorities.  
In FY25 EROAD will roll out a revised safety plan with 
a particular focus on consolidating our data, enhancing 
contractor management and health monitoring programmes 
for anyone exposed to health risks. 
PRINCIPLE 7: AUDITORS
Oversight of the Company’s external audit arrangements 
to safeguard the integrity of financial reporting is the 
responsibility of the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee. The 
FRAC Charter sets out the procedure for communication with 
the external auditors. The External Auditor Independence 
Policy ensures that audit independence is maintained, both in 
fact and appearance. It covers:
•	 the selection and appointment process for the external 
auditor; 
•	 rotation of external audit partners; 
•	 policy to ensure external auditors’ independence; 
•	 provision of non-audit services; and 
•	 reporting to the Finance, Risk and Audit Committee.
The role of the external auditor is to audit the financial 
statements of the Company in accordance with applicable 
auditing standards in New Zealand and to report on their 
findings to the Board and answer questions from the 
shareholders of the Company. 
EROAD’s key external audit partner is Aaron Woolsey from 
KPMG. Mr Woolsey became the engagement partner in 2020 
following the completion of the audit for the 2020 financial 
year. Mr Woolsey has provided an independence attestation 
to the Board. He will attend the annual shareholder’s meeting 
to answer questions from shareholders in relation to audits. In 
accordance with EROAD’s External Auditor Independence 
Policy, following the final audit for FY24 the key audit partner 
will rotate. 
EROAD does not have an internal audit function. The 
Finance, Risk & Audit Committee pays particular attention 
to matters raised by the Company’s auditor. It also requires 
the Executive Team to report periodically on areas identified 
as most sensitive to risk together with recommendations 
for improvements and changes to internal controls. 
Through the steps outlined under the Risk Management 
section, the Board ensures EROAD is reviewing, evaluating 
and continually improving the effectiveness of our risk 
management framework. 
The Chief Financial Officer has a direct line of communication 
with the Chair of the Finance, Audit and Risk Committee and 
the external auditor. 
PAGE 120 
PAGE 121
EROAD GOVERNANCE REPORT 2024

PRINCIPLE 8: SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND INTERESTS 
EROAD recognises the importance of providing our 
shareholders and the broader investment community 
with access to up to date, high-quality information to 
enable them to: monitor the Company’s performance; 
participate in decisions required to be put to owners; and 
provide avenues for two-way communication between the 
Company, the Board and shareholders. The Shareholder 
Communication Policy sets out how EROAD engages with 
shareholders and other stakeholders to provide them with 
written communications, electronic communications and 
access to the Board, management and auditors. It is one of 
the corporate governance policies included on the Investor 
Website. 
EROAD’s Investor Website is an important information portal 
and is kept up to date with relevant information, including 
copies of shareholder reports, presentations and market 
announcements. Releases and reports are published to 
the website once they have been provided to and publicly 
released to both the NZX and ASX. The website also contains 
Board and management profiles together with information 
on EROAD’s history, awards and a library of product 
information. 
Shareholders can easily communicate with EROAD, including 
by way of email to the address investors@eroad.com. 
EROAD’s major communications with shareholders during 
the financial year include our annual and half-year results, 
integrated Annual Reports and the annual meeting of 
shareholders. The Annual Report is available in electronic and 
hard-copy formats. Shareholders have the option to receive 
communications from EROAD electronically. In FY24 EROAD 
introduced its ‘Shareholder Newsletter’ that is periodically 
released to provide a digestible summary of the Company’s 
performance to our retail shareholders. 
Shareholders have the right to vote on major decisions as 
required by the NZX Listing Rules. The Notice of Meeting 
is sent to shareholders and published on EROAD’s website 
at least 20 working days prior to the annual shareholders’ 
meeting each year. EROAD offers this meeting in a hybrid 
format and so also includes a Virtual Meeting Guide which 
sets out information to help investors understand and 
participate in hybrid meetings. Physical meetings will not 
take place if there exists a risk to public health and safety 
(such as with COVID-19 restrictions). In any instance where 
health and safety is a concern, EROAD may determine that 
virtual only meetings are most appropriate.   
The Board notes the recommendation in the NZX Corporate 
Governance Code that boards of issuers are responsible 
for considering the interests of all existing financial product 
holders when assessing their capital raising options. When 
practical, issuers should favour capital raising methods 
that provide existing equity security holders with an 
opportunity to avoid dilution by participating in the offer. 
Recommendation 8.4 states that shares should first be 
offered pro rata, and on no less favourable terms, to existing 
shareholders before further equity securities are offered 
to other investors. In September 2023 EROAD conducted 
a successful NZ$50 million capital raise via an Institutional 
Placement and a Pro Rata Accelerated Renounceable 
Entitlement Offer (“AREO”). A placement offer is typically 
the most common institutional capital raising structure used 
in New Zealand and an AREO structure was preferred by the 
Board to provide greater protection to shareholders.   
PAGE 122 
PAGE 123
EROAD GOVERNANCE REPORT 2024

Remuneration 
Report
LETTER FROM THE PEOPLE AND CULTURE COMMITTEE CHAIR 
1 Not all EROAD employees received an increase in fixed remuneration 
following the annual remuneration review.   
PAGE 124 
PAGE 125
EROAD REMUNERATION REPORT 2024
Dear Shareholders, 
Financial year 2024 represented a significant turning point for EROAD. 
In March, the company adopted a dual CEO model and appointed 
David Kenneson to work alongside Mark Heine as Co-CEO. With their 
complementary skill sets, the Board is confident Mark and David will 
together lead the company in its next phase of growth.    
Co-CEO appointment 
With the goal to grow in North America, and innovate 
and enhance EROAD’s market position in New Zealand, 
we determined that we required executive presence in 
both markets to achieve results for our shareholders. 
EROAD’s current position within each market necessitates 
a combination of skills and a significant time commitment 
across multiple time zones. The shared CEO structure 
provides focus and alignment with the company’s ambitious 
growth plans. With David and Mark leading the charge, we 
have a fully committed and highly capable CEO partnership 
with global reach and the shared skillset to achieve success. 
Remuneration governance
In September 2023 the Board split the Remuneration, Talent 
and Nomination Committee into the People and Culture 
Committee and the Nominations Committee. This change 
was made to enable a more focused approach to people 
related matters going forward. Remuneration falls within the 
People and Culture Committee’s ambit. 
EROAD’s remuneration objectives 
Following an independent remuneration review by Haigh 
& Company in FY23, EROAD’s top priority for FY24 was 
to ensure the retention of key talent with a future-proof 
compensation structure. FY24 saw the roll out of a new and 
improved remuneration strategy aimed at attracting top 
talent globally, with a specific focus on North America as 
our growth market. Our future-focused FY24 remuneration 
strategy aligns employee and shareholder interests and 
maintains a prudent approach to cash management. 
EROAD’s remuneration structure and rationale
EROAD’s remuneration framework is an essential aspect of 
the company’s strategy to attract, retain and motivate its 
employees. The company’s remuneration framework consists 
of fixed remuneration and variable remuneration outcomes 
for select senior employees, including the Co-CEOs. Variable 
remuneration components may include a short-term 
incentive plan (“STI Plan”) payment,  a long-term incentive 
plan (“LTI Plan”) payment or sales commissions (for the 
Company’s sales staff). Variable remuneration components 
are a critical tool for aligning the interests of employees with 
EROAD’s goals and objectives, including both financial and 
non-financial targets. The company intends to maintain this 
current structure in FY25. 
Remuneration Changes in FY24
Fixed Remuneration 
Fixed remuneration rates were reviewed in May 2023, 
leading to an average increase of 4.4% across all employees1. 
Employees earning $200,000 or more in local currencies 
did not receive an increase to fixed remuneration. The 
decision to freeze remuneration for employees earning 
over $200,000 was taken in light of EROAD’s ongoing 
commitment to prudent financial management. The freeze 
enabled us to achieve greater cost savings and allowed us 
to allocate resources more effectively, whilst also ensuring 
that our remuneration policies remained fair, transparent 
and aligned with our company values and objectives. Even 
with a payment increase freeze in place, we believe we are 
still offering competitive, performance-based compensation 
for our employees. The company acknowledges the 
ongoing skill shortages in the industry and the rising cost 
of living affecting our workforce. EROAD is confident our 
remuneration packages are set at a suitable level for our 
global operations.

Variable Remuneration Outcomes
STI Plan
In FY24 the STI Plan moved from a biannual cycle to an 
annual cycle. The shift to an annual cycle was made to 
correspond with the company’s key targets for FY24 
and beyond. To enhance performance outcomes whilst 
maintaining cash flow, the FY24 STI Plan also provides the 
option for payments to be issued in shares instead of cash.
LTI Plan
EROAD’s LTI Plan was modified in FY24 to reflect the 
findings of the independent compensation review and to 
ensure EROAD is appropriately positioned in the market. 
In FY24, performance share rights (“PSRs”) under the 
EROAD LTI Plan were issued as part of a 3-year incentive 
programme that incorporates a third of the award based on 
relative total shareholder return (“rTSR”), a third on absolute 
financial performance, and a third based on 3-year tenure. 
The compensation review confirmed that rTSR is a common 
measure used by our peers, and the company has followed 
the recommendation to adopt the technology-focused 
S&P ASX All Technologies Index (XTX). Aligning incentives 
with long term financial targets is naturally key to driving 
performance outcomes so absolute performance measures 
are based on revenue, free cash flow and EBIT. Tenure is a 
common component of remuneration in North America and 
is a crucial component for us as we look to attract and retain 
top talent. EROAD’s FY24 LTI Plan grants allow for payments 
to be made in cash or shares. 
CEO Remuneration 
Mark Heine’s fixed remuneration remained unchanged 
from FY23, in accordance with the company’s freeze on 
fixed remuneration for senior managers. Mark Heine’s 
variable remuneration recently underwent a change with 
his appointment as Co-CEO, increasing his STI Plan award 
from 40% to 50% of his base salary. David Kenneson’s 
remuneration package is aligned with Mr Heine’s to ensure 
consistency between the Co-CEO’s, despite typically higher 
CEO rates seen in the United States. Mr Kenneson’s salary is 
paid in local currency.  
ESG and Remuneration 
Sustainability is core to our business operations and 
EROAD’s People and Culture Committee is dedicated to 
furthering ESG objectives. As an equal opportunity employer, 
EROAD is committed to closing the pay differential between 
male and female staff, which currently stands at 14% 
(weighted mean value across all regions in local currencies) 
and 17% (median value) .
Director Remuneration
The annual non-executive director remuneration pool was 
fixed at $850,000 following approval of an ordinary resolution 
by shareholders at the 2021 Annual Shareholder Meeting. No 
further increase is proposed to be sought at the 2024 Annual 
Shareholders Meeting. However, pursuant to NZX Listing Rule 
2.11.3, the Board increased  the remuneration payable to all 
directors in aggregate, from $850,000 to NZD$900,000 to 
facilitate the current board composition, which is explained in 
more detail in this report. The Board elected to only increase 
the fee pool to the extent necessary to facilitate the increase 
in the number of directors from the number when the 
remuneration pool was approved in 2021. 
Say On Pay Vote 
During FY24, the NZX issued guidance on remuneration 
reporting by publishing its NZX Remuneration Reporting 
Template. EROAD has adopted the new template for FY24, 
which we expect to be the approach taken by many other 
NZX listed issuers. 
Consequently, EROAD will not present a non-binding Say 
on Pay resolution vote to shareholders at its 2024 Annual 
Shareholders’ Meeting. As a New Zealand registered 
company, EROAD will adhere to the NZX guidance.  It is 
notable that the NZX Corporate Governance Institute, 
responsible for the development and recommendation 
to NZX of the Remuneration Reporting Template, did not 
recommend that an equivalent to the Australian Say on Pay 
regime be introduced for NZX listed issuers.
EROAD remains dedicated to upholding a fair and merit-
based approach to incentivising and rewarding our 
employees, executives, and directors. This commitment 
aligns with our vision and strategic objectives, ensuring 
continued shareholder value and trust. 
Personal note
2024 marks my first year as Chair of EROAD’s People & 
Culture Committee. I am honoured to hold this position 
and wish to thank my fellow directors, EROAD’s leadership 
team and the shareholders for their unwavering support.
Feedback
EROAD is committed to upholding the highest 
standards of corporate governance that help ensure our 
remuneration practices are transparent and align with 
the interests of all our stakeholders. We welcome your 
feedback on this report via investors@eroad.com.
Sara Gifford 
Chair, People and Culture Committee
PAGE 126 
PAGE 127
EROAD REMUNERATION REPORT 2024

STRUCTURE OF THIS REMUNERATION REPORT
This Report provides:
•	 Remuneration Governance; 
•	 Executive Remuneration Policy; 
•	 FY24 Key Performance Summary; 
•	 Remuneration arrangements and outcomes for Mark Heine, 
CEO (Co-CEO from March 2024) and David Kenneson, Co-
CEO from March 2024;
•	 ESG disclosures; 
•	 Remuneration Bands (in accordance with the  Companies 
Act 1993 (NZ));
•	 Director Remuneration 
REMUNERATION GOVERNANCE 
EROAD has a People and Culture Committee that 
comprises of the following members: Sara Gifford (Chair), 
Susan Paterson and David Green. All Committee members 
have served on the Committee since its inception in 
September 2023. A description of the skills and experience 
of each Committee member is detailed on page 46. 
Attendance at FY24 Committee meetings is detailed on 
page 115 of the Annual Report.
Prior to the formation of the People and Culture 
Committee, remuneration matters were overseen by 
the Remuneration, Talent and Nominations Committee 
comprised of Anthony Gibson2 , Sara Gifford3 , Graham 
Stuart, Susan Paterson and Barry Einsig. No meetings 
were held by the Remuneration, Talent and Nominations 
Committee in FY24. 
All members of the People and Culture Committee 
are independent directors. Management only attends 
Committee meetings by invitation. 
The People and Culture Committee offers 
recommendations to the Board regarding company-wide 
remuneration, benefits, and policies. The Committee also 
oversees performance objectives, remuneration packages, 
succession planning, and development programmes for the 
senior management team. Company culture and values, 
together with health, safety, environmental and wellbeing 
matters are key considerations for the Committee alongside 
remuneration matters.  The Committee is not responsible 
for director selection, appointment, reappointment 
or succession planning, this is now overseen by the 
Nominations Committee. 
EROAD’s People and Culture Committee operates under a 
written charter which is available to view at 
https://eroadglobal.com/investors/. The objectives and 
activities are periodically reviewed, and any changes in the 
duties and responsibilities of the Committee, or changes to 
the terms of its Charter, are made as a recommendation to 
the Board. No changes were made since the Committee’s 
creation in September 2023. 
The Committee has no decision-making powers except 
where expressly provided by the Board.
The internal governance policies that provide context for 
the remuneration outcomes are described below:
•	 No Dealing or Protection Arrangements: All directors, 
employees, contractors and advisers of EROAD are 
subject to the company’s Securities Trading Policy, 
available via the investor website. In addition to this 
policy, parties are expressly prohibited from entering 
into any arrangements designed to hedge or otherwise 
mitigate the economic risk of EROAD securities. It is 
important to note that all securities become subject 
to the Securities Trading Policy rules once they have 
vested and that prior to vesting those securities cannot 
be transferred or encumbered by the holders. 
•	 Minimum Shareholding Requirements: The EROAD 
Board encourages but does not require senior 
leadership team members or directors to hold shares 
in EROAD.
Further information on the People and Culture Committee, 
including the broader responsibilities of the People and 
Culture Committee and meeting attendance during FY24 
can be found on pages 114-115 of the Annual Report.
Executive Remuneration Policy 
EROAD’s Director and Executive Remuneration Policy 
FY24 ensures fair and competitive remuneration that 
attracts, motivates and retains high-performing employees. 
Our revised remuneration policy clearly aligns with our 
company purpose and values. We have also developed 
a set of principles to guide our remuneration strategy to 
ensure that our compensation practices are consistent with 
the company culture, values, and business strategy.
2 Committee Chair until 31 July 2023.
3 Committee Chair from 1 August 2023.
Principle
Description
Alignment
EROAD aims to ensure that a significant portion of the senior leadership team’s remuneration is 
contingent on EROAD meeting its financial and strategic objectives, and the individual acting in 
accordance with EROAD’s values
Balance
Market competitive fixed remuneration is balanced with affordability
Flexibility
EROAD’s STI Plan and LTI Plan performance measures provided flexibility for EROAD to recognise 
and reward individuals for outstanding contribution and respond appropriately to business 
objectives and needs
Fairness
EROAD’s remuneration structure ensures there is a direct link between performance and pay
Reward
Ensure achievement of strategic objectives and shareholder value creation is rewarded accordingly
Transparency
There are no complicated performance measures that require extensive explanation. The 
remuneration structure is clear, transparent, consistent, easy to understand and simple to 
administer
Competitiveness
EROAD’s remuneration structure helps attract, motivate and retain directors and executives who 
contribute to EROAD’s business outcomes
You can read more about EROAD’s culture and values on 
page 40.
Executive Remuneration Components
EROAD uses a total remuneration package approach in 
setting salary and rewards for executives. Remuneration 
of executives is linked to 3 components: Total Fixed 
remuneration, STI Plan awards and LTI Plan grants. For 
executives, Total Fixed Remuneration makes up 56% of the 
total remuneration package, with STI and LTI making up 17% 
and 28% respectively.    
Total Fixed Remuneration 
Total Fixed Remuneration is a combination of base 
salary and benefits. The total is benchmarked against 
independent remuneration survey data, with the 
median level of pay being used as the basis for EROAD’s 
remuneration approach. This approach allows EROAD 
to implement a non-discriminatory pay structure that 
offers equal pay for equal work value across EROAD 
employees globally. Contractual and discretionary 
benefits vary between our regions of operation. 
The co-CEOs and executive team members must 
participate in periodic performance reviews measuring 
their achievement against operational and strategic 
objectives. The results of any performance review inform 
the basis of any review of fixed remuneration. 
PAGE 128 
PAGE 129
EROAD REMUNERATION REPORT 2024

Variable Remuneration
STI Plan
EROAD’s STI Plan is designed to motivate, encourage and 
reward positive behaviours in the near-term. In FY24, the 
company’s STI Plan was structured to link share incentives 
to achievement of specific annual performance targets, with 
the amount based on a percentage of a participant’s fixed 
base salary. The People and Culture Committee reviews and 
approves executive and key senior role objectives, promoting 
alignment between shareholder value creation and employee 
rewards. STI Plan awards for FY24 were based on an annual 
performance period (commencing 1 April each year), aligned 
to investor cycles and key outcomes. STI Plan awards are 
determined by group performance against shared team 
goals. The annual review of STI Plan objectives takes into 
account group, business unit and individual executive 
performance. STI Plan payments are always at the discretion 
of the Board and receipt of an STI Plan payment is not 
guaranteed, even where performance criteria have been met. 
EROAD’s FY24 STI Plan provides for payments to be made 
in cash or shares, at the Board’s discretion. Historically, STI 
Plans have typically been paid in cash however for FY24 the 
award may be made in shares (if awarded). FY24 STI Plan 
payments have not yet been assessed and will be assessed 
within 3 months of the date of the FY24 financial statements. 
The CEO and Executive Team STI Plans are described in 
detail in the table below:
Element
Details  
FY24 CEO STI Plan4
FY24 Executive STI Plan
Purpose
Rewards achievement of Board-set KPIs.
Target opportunity 
Share award of up to 40% of base salary. 
Share award of up to 30% of base salary
Performance and pay out leverage
The aggregated threshold for the financial metrics 
needs to be over 85% (i.e. the combination of 
revenue, EBIT and FCF). 
Non-financial metrics must achieve a minimum 
threshold of 85%, and capped at 130%
Performance 
Level
Performance 
as % Target
Award 
as % Target
Threshold

      
75%
            50%
Ratable  Straight Line    Basis
Target

     
100%
           100%
Ratable  Straight Line   Basis
Overachieve-
ment
150%
150%
The aggregated threshold for the financial metrics 
needs to be over 85% (i.e. the combination of revenue, 
EBIT and FCF). 
Performance and Award set at a minimum threshold 
75% and capped at 130%. 
Performance 
Level
Performance 
as % Target
Award 
as % Target
Threshold

      
75%
            50%
Ratable  Straight Line    Basis
Target

     
100%
           100%
Ratable  Straight Line   Basis
Overachieve-
ment
150%
150%
Performance period
Full financial year 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024.
Objectives 
Financial: 75% based on EROAD’s performance 
against the metrics of Reported Revenue, Group 
EBIT and Free Cash Flow. 
Non-Financial: 25% based on achievement of 
selected strategic objectives. Each objective has 
a specific target and stretch level of performance, 
as described under the “Performance and pay 
out leverage” section above. Each objective has 
a specific target and stretch level of performance, 
as described under the “Performance and pay out 
leverage” section above.
Financial: 75% based on EROAD’s performance 
against the metrics of Reported Revenue, Group EBIT 
and Free Cash Flow.
Non-Financial: 25% based on achievement of selected 
strategic objectives. Each objective has a specific 
target and stretch level of performance, as described 
under the “Performance and pay out leverage” section 
above.
Objectives set
Following completion of financial year budgets.
Objectives
In relation to the CEO’s performance, the People 
and Culture Committee makes a recommendation 
to the Board.
The Co-CEOs review executive performance and 
make a payment recommendation to the People and 
Culture Committee. 
The Board will, in its sole discretion, assess whether 
the performance targets have been met within 2 
months of the external auditor’s confirmation of the 
accuracy of the fiscal year end results.
STI payment
The Board will, in its sole discretion, assess 
whether the performance targets have been 
met within 3 months of the external auditor’s 
confirmation of the accuracy of the fiscal year end 
results.
The FY24 STI Plan stipulates that payments, if any, are 
made on an annual basis upon determination of the 
STI Plan payment by the People & Culture Committee 
and by the Co-CEOs for senior executives. However, 
such payments are subject to the Board‘s approval 
and at its sole discretion. If payment is to be made, 
STI Plan payments will be paid within 2 months of the 
external auditor’s confirmation of the accuracy of the 
fiscal year end results and approval of the Board.  
4 Co-CEO Mark Heine was under the CEO STI Plan in FY24. Co-CEO David Kenneson was not under this Plan as he joined near the end of FY24. 
PAGE 130 
PAGE 131
EROAD REMUNERATION REPORT 2024

LTI Plan 
EROAD’s LTI Plan was modified in FY24 to reflect the 
findings of the independent compensation review and to 
ensure EROAD is appropriately positioned in the market.  
Under the modified LTI Plan, performance share rights 
(“PSRs”) are issued to the CEO and other senior executives 
which gives them the right to receive ordinary shares in 
the Company after a specified period, subject to achieving 
certain performance hurdles. 
EROAD’s LTI Plan is designed to motivate and retain key 
executive and senior employees who can influence the 
company’s performance by offering performance-based 
incentives that align with EROAD’s strategic objectives and 
long-term value creation. The Board retains discretion over 
the terms of a participant’s participation in the Plan (with the 
agreement of the participant) or to amend the Plan Rules 
or the terms of any grant if it considers the interests of the 
participants are not materially affected. EROAD’s FY24 LTI 
Grant provides for participants to be paid in shares or cash. 
Historically, LTI Plan payments have typically been paid in 
shares. In FY24, EROAD issued 1,493,098 PSRs to participants 
under the FY24 LTI Grant.5  
The FY24 LTI Grant is described below.
5 $2,226,156 remains as liability under the same Grant, subject to performance criteria being met. The Board intends to issue the FY24 LTI award as shares.  
6 The Board intends to issue the FY24 LTI award as shares. 
Element
Details  
Purpose
Reward and retain key EROAD executives and senior leadership members for FY24 in order to deliver on FY24 goals, drive 
longer-term performance, align incentives of the CEO with the interests of EROAD’s shareholders and encourage longer term 
decision-making by Plan participants. 
Mechanism and 
performance 
period
PSRs were issued in FY24 as part of a 3-year incentive programme that incorporates award types as described below. Awards 
may be paid in either shares or cash, at the Board’s discretion.6 
Performance 
Metrics
Award type
Portion 
of total
Vesting mechanics 
intentions
Rationale
Weightings
Performance
range
Time Vested Units
1/3
Vests 100% at the 
end of 3 years
Supports retention 
and continuity of 
key employees 
while EROAD 
implements and 
executes its new 
long-term strategy 
100%
0% if not achieved 
Performance-
Relative 
Shareholder 
Return (rTSR)7
1/3
Vests at the end 
of 3 years based 
on EROAD’s 
rTSR against the 
peers on the ASX 
Technology Index 
(XTX) over 3 years 
of the plan
Focuses 
management and 
key employees 
on building and 
maintaining long-
term shareholder 
value and 
outperforming 
relevant market 
benchmarks
100%
From 0% - 200% of rTSR shares 
vested, as follows:
•	 Under 40th percentile of XTX = 
0% rTSR shares vested
•	 40th percentile of XTX = 50% 
rTSR shares vested
•	 60th percentile of XTX = 100% 
rTSR shares vested
•	 80th percentile of XTX = 150% 
rTSR shares vested
•	 100th percentile of XTX = 200% 
rTSR shares vested
Performance – 
Absolute EROAD 
Performance 
(Revenue, EBIT, 
FCF)
1/3
Vests at the end 
of 3 years but 
assessed as follows:
20% per annum 
performance 
segments based on 
the 3-year budget 
set at the beginning 
of the LTI Plan and 
40% 3-year 
cumulative 
segment
Focuses on 
execution of the 
long-term strategy 
delivering revenue 
growth, profitable 
performance 
and positive free 
cashflow.
20% each 
year and 
40% 
cumulative 
at the end 
of the 
3-year 
period.
From 85% - 130% depending on 
achievement. 
Failure to meet minimum threshold 
of 85% means zero pay-out. 
Opportunity
CEO: 100% of base salary
Executive Team: 50% of base salary 
Eligibility 
Requirements
Participants remain employed by EROAD and are not serving out a notice period at the date any payment is scheduled to be 
paid. 
A participant not been suspended, or subject to any disciplinary action or performance management process, during the 
Performance Period. 
Neither the participant, nor EROAD Limited or any of its related companies have been subject to any investigation, 
prosecution or other action by a regulatory body, including in respect of non-compliance with health and safety legislation, 
civil rights legislation, or holiday and leave legislation during the Performance Period.
Board 
Discretion
Any payment by the Board is entirely discretionary. Even where Performance Metrics and Eligibility Requirements are met, the 
Chair and/or EROAD Limited’s Board of Directors retain the sole discretion as to whether to pay an incentive and, if so, how 
much.  
7 rTSR or relative total shareholder return means EROAD’s total shareholder return compared to the peer companies’ total shareholder return on a relative basis. 
rTSR is a measure of financial performance.  
PAGE 132 
PAGE 133
EROAD REMUNERATION REPORT 2024

Incentivising appropriate risk-taking and risk management 
also underpins our remuneration principles and our approach 
is demonstrated in several ways:
•	 The People and Culture Committee has discretion to adjust 
Variable Remuneration for STI Plan awards based on 
EROAD’s financial performance and individual behaviour, 
including adherence to the Code of Conduct and Risk 
Appetite Statement. 
•	 The Board administers all aspects of EROAD’s LTI Plan, 
including the making of Grants and the exercise of Eligible 
Share Rights. 
•	 The Board retains sole discretion to issue shares relating to 
the Performance Share Rights granted to employees upon 
cessation of employment.
Variation of Terms
The Board may from time to time vary any terms of a 
Participant’s participation in the company STI Plan or LTI 
Plan, with the agreement of the participant.
EROAD’s Director and Executive Remuneration Policy 
FY24 is available via EROAD’s investor website at 
https://eroadglobal.com/investors/. 
The number of executives to whom the Director and Executive 
Remuneration Policy applies is 9 as at 31 March 2024. You can 
read more about our executive team on page 48.
External and Independent Advice
During the year the People and Culture Committee sought 
external and independent advice from Haigh & Company 
to review and make recommendations on EROAD’s existing 
remuneration framework for both staff and executive 
employees for FY24 and beyond. In addition, EROAD 
obtained guidance on employee remuneration for those 
based in Australia and New Zealand from Strategic Pay and 
sought advice from Insperity for employees based in North 
America.
CEO AND CO-CEO REMUNERATION ARRANGEMENTS 
AND OUTCOMES 
CEO and Co-CEO Remuneration Arrangements
Mr Heine’s fixed remuneration remained at $700,000 for 
FY24. In New Zealand, EROAD provides its employees with 
subsidised healthcare and 3% employer contributions to 
Kiwisaver, to which Mr Heine is entitled to receive. Mr Heine 
is also eligible to receive up to 40% of his base salary as a 
cash payment or share based payment under EROAD’s FY24 
STI Plan, and up to 100% of his base salary under EROAD’s 
3-year FY24 LTI Grant. 
From March 2024 the Co-CEO’s salaries comprises of fixed 
remuneration of NZD$700,000 per annum for Mr Heine 
and USD$450,000 for Mr Kenneson. Variable remuneration 
will comprise of STI Plan eligibility of up to 50% of fixed 
remuneration per Co-CEO (NZD$350,000/USD$225,000) in 
cash or shares, and LTI Plan eligibility of up to NZD$700,000/
USD$450,000 in cash or shares respectively under EROAD’s 
FY25 grants. Entitlement under variable remuneration is 
subject to performance criteria being met (disclosed above) 
and is at the Board’s discretion. Mr Kenneson is entitled 
to receive employment benefits including including 3% 
employer contribution to 401K and standard employee 
insurance covering long term disability and basic life 
insurance. Mr Kenneson also receives healthcare subsidies, 
which all employees are entitled to receive. 
Co-CEO remuneration mix
42%
Fixed Rem
42%
LTI Potential
16%
STI Potential
The remuneration mix for the Co-CEOs is as follows:
CEO Remuneration Outcomes
The CEO remuneration outcomes for the last 5 years are: 
Year
CEO
Gross Fixed 
Remuneration8
STI Plan
LTI Plan
Total Value 
of Variable 
Remuneration
Total 
Remuneration 
Outcomes 
STI Plan 
award paid 
in cash
Amount 
paid 
as % of 
maximum 
award 
under STI 
Plan
Value of 
LTI Plan 
grant 
Vested9
Amount 
paid 
as % of 
maximum 
grant 
under LTI 
Plan
Price per 
share at 
vesting 
date
FY20
Steven Newman
$603,796
$213,048
Not 
previously 
disclosed.
-
-
-
$213,048
$816,844
FY21
Steven Newman 
$603,044
$133,902
Not 
previously 
disclosed.
-
-
-
$133,902
$736,946
FY22
Steven Newman
$677,618
$115,819
Not 
previously 
disclosed.
$394,658
Not 
previously 
disclosed.
Not 
previously 
disclosed.
$510,477
$1,188,095
FY23
Steven 
Newman10
$435,843
-
$351,480
Not 
previously 
disclosed.
Not 
previously 
disclosed.
$351,480
$787,323
FY23
Mark Heine 
(Acting CEO)11
$147,369
-
$160,846
Not 
previously 
disclosed.
Not 
previously 
disclosed.
$160,846
$308,215
FY23
Mark Heine 
(Permanent 
CEO)12
$575,215
-
-
Not 
previously 
disclosed.
Not 
previously 
disclosed.
-
$575,215
FY24
Mark Heine13
$716,838
$331,24014 67.6%15
$55,16916
100%17  
$0.62
$386,409
$1,103,247
FY24
David Kenneson18 USD$34,091
-
-
-
-
-
$0
USD$34,091
8 Gross Fixed Remuneration includes base salary payments and other benefits such as Kiwisaver contribution paid at 3%, annual leave entitlements, backpay due to 
pay increases and additional allowances e.g. “higher duties allowance”.
9 All LTI Plan grants were made by issuing PSRs that upon vesting, resulting in ordinary shares being issued to the CEO on a 1:1 basis. 
10 Steven Newman resigned as CEO on 8 April 2022. Disclosures are made for his remuneration from 1 April to 8 April 2022. Steven Newman’s Gross Fixed 
Remuneration includes holiday pay
11 Mark Heine was the acting CEO following Steven Newman’s resignation. Disclosures are made for Mark Heine’s remuneration in his role as acting CEO between 8 
April 2022 to 20 June 2022. 
12 Mark Heine was appointed as EROAD’s permanent CEO on 21 June 2022. Disclosures are made for Mr Heine’s remuneration as permanent CEO from 21 June 2022 
to 31 March 2023. 
13 Mark Heine was appointed Co-CEO from 5 March 2024, sharing the CEO duties and responsibilities with David Kenneson. 
14 STI Plan payment relates to the FY23 reporting period and was paid to Mark Heine in FY24 in July 2023. This award relates to H2 FY23. No STI Plan payments 
were made for H1 FY23. 
15 The amount paid as a percentage reflects an assessment based on performance against targets in H2 FY23. No STI Plan payments were made for H1 FY243.
16 This award was made under EROAD’s FY23 LTI Grant. The FY23 Grant was made by issuing PSRs that upon vesting, resulted in ordinary shares being issued to 
the CEO on a 1 : 1 basis. The value set out represents the market value of the shares issued to the CEO, calculated as the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) 
of ordinary shares on the NZX over the 20 day VWAP immediately prior to the issue of shares. 
17 Mark Heine received 100% of PSRs granted to him under EROAD’s FY23 LTI Grant which transferred to him as ordinary shares on a 1 : 1 basis.
18 David Kenneson was appointed Co-CEO from 5 March 2024, sharing the CEO duties and responsibilities with Mark Heine.
PAGE 134 
PAGE 135
EROAD REMUNERATION REPORT 2024

19 Financial targets were weighted 60% and 27.6% of these were achieved. Non-financial targets were weighted at 40% and 40% achievement was awarded. 
20 After the end of the third financial year, being 31 March 2026.
21 After the end of the third financial year, being 31 March 2026, EROAD’s rTSR is assessed against its peers on the ASX Technology Index (XTX) over the 3 years of 
the LTI Grant, being FY24, FY25 and FY26.
22 Absolute performance will be assessed at 20% per annum for each of the 3 financial years contemplated by the Grant. The remaining 40% will be a cumulative 
assessment made at the end of the 3-year grant period, being after 31 March 2026 pursuant to the FY24 LTI Grant.  
CEO STI Outcomes
In FY24 and prior to the appointment of David Kenneson, CEO Mark Heine was under a CEO specific STI Plan. Mr Heine was 
then newly appointed to the role and the Board wanted to ensure that his performance was evaluated separately from the 
rest of the executive team. This was done to align his incentives with the specific financial goals he was tasked with achieving. 
Mark Heine
STI Target
STI Awarded
Earned
% Earned of 
Awarded 
% of Target
Awarded
FY23
Up to 70% of 
base salary
$490,000
67.6%
$331,240
$331,240
100%
67.6%19
FY24
Up to 40% of 
base salary
$280,000
Not yet 
determined 
Not yet 
determined 
Not yet 
determined 
Not yet 
determined 
Not yet 
determined
FY24 Performance Hurdles
STI Weighting 
Core financial targets – revenue, EBIT and free cash flow 
75%
Key strategic and operational goals 
25%
CEO STI Outcomes
FY23 LTI Plan Performance Outcomes
Performance hurdles 
LTI Plan Weighting 
Weighted Outcome
Vesting date
Value 
Time Vested Units
100%
100%
6 April 2023
$55,169
FY24 Performance Hurdles
CEO LTI Plan outcomes cannot yet be disclosed as performance will be assessed after 31 March 2026 pursuant to EROAD’s 
3-year FY24 LTI Grant. 
Performance hurdles 
Portion of total
Weighted Outcome
Weighted Outcome
Assessed
Time Vested Units
1/3
100%
Not yet determined 
At the end of 3 years.20
Performance - rTSR
1/3
up to 200%
Not yet determined
At the end of 3 years.21
Performance – Absolute 
EROAD Performance 
(Revenue, EBIT, FCF)
1/3
85-130%
Not yet determined
At the end of 3 years.22
PSRs Granted to Co-CEO Mark Heine  during FY24
A summary of the outstanding PSRs granted to the CEO under the FY23 LTI Grant and FY24 LTI Grant as at 31 March 2024 is 
as follows: 
PSR
grant
date
Vesting 
date
Balance 
of PSRs 
at 31 
March 
2023
Granted during the 
reporting period
PSRs vested/lapsed 
in relation to the 
reporting period
Shares issued in relation to the 
reporting period
Balance 
of PSRs 
at 31 
March 
20243
PSRs 
granted
Market 
Price per 
share 
at grant 
date
PSRs 
lapsed
PSRs 
vested
Shares 
issued 
following 
vesting 
Market 
Price per 
share 
at issue 
date
Issue 
date
13 October 
2022
31 March 
2023
88,983
0
N/A
0
88,983
88,983
$0.62 
6 April
2024
0
6 July
2023
31 March 
2026
0
295,312
$1.01 
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
295,312
Co-CEO Shareholdings as at 31 March 2024
Ordinary Shares
Balance at 1 April 
2023
FY23 LTI Grant 
Vested
Participation in 
Placement
Participation in 
Rights Offer
Balance at 31 March 
2024 
Mark Heine, co-CEO
101,085
88,983 
30,000
92,266
312,334
David Kenneson, co-CEO
-
-
-
-
-
Co-CEO employment conditions
Item
Details
Basis of contract
Ongoing (no fixed term)
Notice period
6 months by either party
Termination payment entitlements
For no fault termination or redundancy, the CEO will receive a severance payment equivalent to 6 
months base salary and STI Plan awards may be paid out at the Board di scretion.
Base salary
Subject to annual review (but no adjustments to base salary are guaranteed)
Key performance summary - TSR performance
EROAD will include a total shareholder return (rTSR) performance graph in its FY26 Remuneration Report to align with the 
assessment of performance hurdles pursuant to the FY24 LTI Grant. 
PAGE 136 
PAGE 137
EROAD REMUNERATION REPORT 2024

24 Calculated by taking a weighted approach to headcount per region to avoid fx fluctuations impacting gender pay gap representations. Regional 
paygaps were calculated for separately then combined into a global paygap based on the number of employees in each region to remove the potential 
distortion from different currencies and the regional purchasing power of equivalent salaries.
ESG Disclosures 
EROAD’s gender pay gap currently stands at 17% (median) and 14% (weighted mean) when measured across all employees and all 
regions.24 EROAD is committed to closing the gender pay gap and has a number of initiatives underway. You can read more about 
this in the “Our People” section of this Annual Report.
Annual Total compensation ratio (GRI Disclosure 2-21)
Ratio of the annual total compensation for EROAD’s highest paid 
individual to the median annual total compensation for all employees 
(excluding the highest paid individual).
6:1
Ratio of the percentage increase in annual total compensation for 
EROAD’s highest-paid individual to the median percentage increase 
in annual total compensation for all employees (excluding the 
highest-paid individual).
The highest paid employee did not receive an increase in FY24.  The 
ratio for all other employees, excluding the highest paid individual was 
0 : 4.
Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men (GRI Disclosure 2-21)
New Zealand 
1 : 1.2 
Australia 
1 : 0.9
United Sates of America
1 to 1.1
EMPLOYEE REMUNERATION
The following table sets out the number of current and 
former employees (other than employees who are directors) 
whose remuneration and other benefits for FY24 was above 
NZ$100,000 in value. 
EROAD has employees in New Zealand, the United States 
and Australia with remuneration market levels which differ 
between the three countries. Of EROAD’s 324 employees 
noted in the table below who received remuneration and other 
benefits that exceed NZ $100,000 in value, 97 (29.9 %) are 
employed by EROAD in the United States of America, 13  (4 %) 
in Australia and 214  (66.05 %) in New Zealand. The overseas 
remuneration amounts in US dollars and Australian dollars are 
converted into New Zealand dollars at rates of 0.596725 and 
0.91532426 respectively. 
NZ$
 Total
100,000 - 110,000
35
110,000 - 120,000
23
120,000 - 130,000
22
130,000 - 140,000
33
140,000 - 150,000
30
150,000 - 160,000
28
160,000 - 170,000
26
170,000 - 180,000
16
190,000 - 200,000
16
200,000 - 210,000
17
210,000 - 220,000
13
220,000 - 230,000
1
230,000 - 240,000
7
240,000 - 250,000
7
250,000 - 260,000
3
260,000 - 270,000
5
270,000 - 280,000
4
280,000 - 290,000
5
290,000 - 300,000
3
320,000 - 330,000
4
300,000 - 310,000
6
310,000 - 320,000 
1
320,000-330,000
1
330,000-340,000
4
360,000 - 370,000
1
380,000-390,000
1
390,000-400,000
1
430,000 - 440,000
1
440,000-450,000
1
460,000 - 470,000
2
470,000-480,000
1
490,000-500,000
1
530,000-540,000
1
680,000-690,000 
1
700,000 – 710,000
1
870,000-880,000
1
1,040,000-1,050,000
1
1,260,000-1,270,000
1
Total
324
25 Australian fx rate as at 31 March 2024.
26 United States fx rate as at 31 March 2024.
PAGE 138 
PAGE 139
EROAD REMUNERATION REPORT 2024

DIRECTOR REMUNERATION
The People and Capability Committee is responsible for 
establishing and monitoring remuneration policies and 
guidelines for directors which enable EROAD to attract, 
motivate and retain a high calibre of directors who will 
contribute to the successful governing of EROAD and create 
value for shareholders. 
When determining the fees for non-executive directors and 
Chairs of the Board and our committees, the Board considers 
the need to maintain appropriately experienced and qualified 
directors in accordance the fee levels for comparable listed 
companies in New Zealand, Australia and United States. 
Independent external advice on director remuneration was 
obtained from PwC in FY22. EROAD’s Director and Executive 
Remuneration Policy FY24 is available via EROAD’s investor 
website at https://eroadglobal.com/investors/.
The directors who held office during FY24 are as follows:
Position 
Country of residence
Period position was
held during FY24
Graham Stuart27
Chair
Independent Director 
New Zealand
Until 10 July 2023
From 10 July 2023
Barry Einsig
Independent Director
United States 
Full year
Tony Gibson28
Independent Director
New Zealand
Until 1 August 2023
Susan Paterson29
Chair 
Independent Director
New Zealand
Until 10 July 2023
From 10 July 2023
Sara Gifford
Independent Director
United States 
Full year
Selwyn Pellett
Non-Executive Director
New Zealand
Full year
David Green
Independent Director
New Zealand
From 1 August 2023
Cameron Kinloch
Independent Director
United States 
From 28 March 2024
27 Graham Stuart resigned from his role as Chair on 10 July 2023. He resigned from the Board on 31 March 2024.
28 Tony Gibson retired from the Board following EROAD’s FY23 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting on 28 July 2023.
29 Susan Paterson assumed the role of Board Chair on 10 July 2023.
In 2021 the total non-executive director remuneration pool 
was fixed at $850,000. In 2024 the director fee pool was 
increased to $900,000 in accordance with NZX Listing Rule 
2.11.3. The Board approved a small increase to the director 
fee pool to accommodate the increased number of directors 
from the number of directors when the director fee pool was 
approved. Under the company Remuneration Policy, non-
executive directors do not receive any performance-based 
remuneration and no retirement payments are made to 
directors or executive employees for their service.  
Annual fees payable for FY24 to non-executive directors are 
as follows:
Country of residence
Chair
Director30
Finance, Risk and 
Audit Committee 
Chair31
People and Culture 
Committee Chair32
Nominations 
Committee Chair33
Technology 
Committee Chair**
New Zealand ($NZD)
150,000
95,000
15,000
12,000
-
Australia ($AUD)
95,000
-
United States ($USD)
96,000
-
12,000
EROAD does not intend to increase the base fees for 
directors over the next year without shareholder approval 
(unless done so in accordance with NZX Listing Rule 2.11.3 to 
accommodate the appointment of an additional director). 
Any unallocated capacity remaining in the annual director 
fee pool is reserved to provide flexibility for the remuneration 
of non-executive directors who assume additional 
responsibilities throughout the year, such as attending ad hoc 
Board committee meetings or performing additional services 
for EROAD in their capacity as directors. No such additional 
remuneration was paid to directors in FY24. 
30 EROAD’s Remuneration Policy allows for additional payments to be made to directors for specific projects they are involved in, including chairing committees.
31 EROAD does not pay committee members additional fees for their roles on such committees.
32 EROAD does not pay committee members additional fees for their roles on such committees.
33 No additional payment made to the Nominations Committee Chair or members
PAGE 140 
PAGE 141
EROAD REMUNERATION REPORT 2024

Non-executive directors received the following directors’ 
fees from EROAD in the year ended 31 March 2024. All 
fees are in NZD unless otherwise indicated:
Base fee
Chair
Fee for 
Finance, Risk 
and Audit 
Committee 
Chair
Fee for 
Remuneration, 
Talent and 
Nomination 
Committee 
Chair
Fee for People 
and Culture 
Committee 
Chair
Fee for 
Nominations 
Committee 
Chair
Fee for 
Technology 
Committee 
Chair
Total 
remuneration 
received for 
FY24
Graham 
Stuart
$69,059.20
$41,129.0334
$9,249.3635
-
-
$119,437.59
Barry 
Einsig
USD$96,000
-
-
-
USD $12,000
USD$108,000
Tony 
Gibson
$31,666.68
-
$4,00036
-
$35,666.6837
Susan 
Paterson
$25,940.83 
$108,870.9438
$4,112.9139
-
$040
-
$138,924.68
Selwyn 
Pellett
$94,999.92
-
-
-
$94,999.92
Sara 
Gifford
USD$96,000
-
USD $6,000
-
USD$102,000
David 
Green
$63,333.2841
$1,661.0642
$64,994.34
Cameron 
Kinloch
USD$1,032.2643
USD$1,032.26
Non-executive directors do not take a portion of 
their remuneration under a share plan. Ownership of 
EROAD shares by Directors is encouraged rather than 
a requirement. When Directors are acquiring shares 
they are encouraged to buy on-market. Their ownership 
interests are disclosed in the “Directors’ Shareholdings” 
section of this report.  
34 Graham Stuart held the role of Board Chair from 1 April 2023 – 10 July 2023. 
35 Graham Stuart held the role of FRAC Chair from 10 July 2023. 
36 Tony Gibson held the role of RTNC Chair from 1 April – 28 July 2023. The RTNC was bifurcated on 19 September 2023 into the People and Culture 
Committee and the Nominations Committee. 
37 Tony Gibson retired from the Board on 28 July 2023.
38 Susan Paterson held the role of Board Chair from 10 July 2023.
39 Susan Paterson held the role of FRAC Chair from 1 April 2023 – 10 July 2023.
40 Susan Paterson assumed the role of Nominations Committee Chair on 19 September 2023. No Chair fee is paid to any director who Chairs the
Nominations Committee. 
41 David Green was appointed to the Board on 1 August 2023. 
42 David Green assumed the role of FRAC Chair on 20 February 2024. 
43 Cameron Kinloch was appointed to the Board on 28 March 2024. 
Non-executive directors are entitled to be reimbursed 
for reasonable costs directly associated with attending 
the Board meetings. Executive directors do not receive 
remuneration for their role as a director of EROAD. 
EROAD does not currently have any executive directors. 
No EROAD director or employee receives or retains any 
remuneration or other benefits in their capacity as a 
director of that subsidiary. 
Regulatory disclosures
PAGE 142 
PAGE 143
DIRECTORS
The persons who held office as directors of EROAD Limited 
at any time during the year ended 31 March 2024, are as 
follows: 
Director
Status
Period position
was held
Susan Paterson 
Non-Executive, 
Independent Director 
Chair 
Until 10 July 2023 
From 10 July 2023
David Green 
Non-Executive, 
Independent Director 
From 1 August 2023
Graham Stuart 
Chair 
Non-Executive, 
Independent Director  
Until 10 July 2023 
From 10 July 2023
Barry Einsig
Non-Executive, 
Independent Director 
Full year
Selwyn Pellett
Non-Executive Director
Full year
Sara Gifford
Non-Executive, 
Independent Director 
Full year
Cameron 
Kinloch 
Non-Executive, 
Independent Director 
From 28 March 2024
Anthony Gibson 
Non-Executive, 
Independent Director 
Until 28 July 2023
SUBSIDIARY COMPANY DIRECTORS
The persons who held office as directors of subsidiary 
companies at any time during the year ended 31 March 2024 
are as follows: 
EROAD Financial 
Services Limited  
Margaret Warrington 
EROAD Australia Pty 
Limited 
Margaret Warrington, Konrad Stempniak 
EROAD Inc.  
Margaret Warrington 
EROAD LTI Trustee 
Limited
Margaret Warrington 
Coretex Limited 
Konrad Stempniak, Margaret Warrington
Coretex NZ Limited
Konrad Stempniak, Margaret Warrington
Coretex Australia 
Pty Ltd
Konrad Stempniak, Margaret Warrington
Coretex USA Inc
Mark Heine, Margaret Warrington 
Imarda Pty Limited
Konrad Stempniak, Margaret Warrington
International 
Telematics Holdings 
Limited
Konrad Stempniak, Margaret Warrington
INTERESTS REGISTER
In accordance with section 140(2) of the Companies Act, 
the directors named below have made a general disclosure 
of interest by a general notice disclosed to the Board and 
entered in the Company’s interests register. General notices 
given by directors which remain current as at 31 March 2024 
are as follows:  
Susan Paterson
Director
Arvida Group Limited
Director
Les Mills Holdings Limited
Director (Chair) 
Steel & Tube Holdings Limited
Director (Chair) 
Theta Systems Limited
Director
Lodestone Energy
Member
Leadership Group of the Aotearoa Circle 
Development an Energy Strategy for NZ 
Director
Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Director (Chair)
Evolution Healthcare
Graham Stuart
Director
Tower Insurance Limited
Director and 
Shareholder
Leroy Holdings Limited
Director
VinPro Limited
Director
Northwest Healthcare Properties 
Management Limited (Northwest 
manages the Vital Healthcare Property 
Trust)
Director
Comhla Vets Limited 
Consultant
FTP Solutions Pty Limited 
Director
Nexus Global Limited 
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024

* Interest added during FY24
PAGE 144 
PAGE 145
David Green 
Independent Director 
and member of 
the Board Risk 
and Compliance 
Committee and 
Board Audit 
Committee 
Westpac New Zealand Limited  
Chair 
BT Funds Management (NZ) Limited 
Chair and 
Independent Director 
MyFarm UF1 GP Limited 
Director and 
Shareholder
Abner & Hobson Limited
Director and 
Shareholder
Casa Verde Investments Limited
Barry Einsig
Founder
Barry C. Einsig Advisory Services LLC
Selwyn Pellett
Director and 
Shareholder
PACE Limited
Director and 
Shareholder
Storm Distribution Limited
Director and 
Shareholder
Swaytech Limited
Director and 
Shareholder
Swayevents Limited
Shareholder
Contex Engineers Limited
Director and 
Shareholder
Streamline Business NZ Limited 
Director and 
Shareholder
Streamline Business Group Limited
Director and 
Shareholder
KTX Limited
Director and 
Shareholder
AIGA Limited
Director
Acume Limited
Director
Ripple 4 Charities Limited
Director
Admin Army Limited
Director and 
Shareholder
Reyburn Investments Limited
Shareholder
Aegis Ceramic Coatings Ltd*
Director and 
Shareholder
Functional Coatings Holdings Limited* 
Director and 
Shareholder
Manu Investments Limited *
Director and 
Shareholder
Bailey Ventures Ltd*
Director and 
Shareholder
Wonderstay Limited*
Sara Gifford
Director and 
Shareholder
Spiro
Co-Founder, Director 
and Shareholder
ActiVote Inc 
Cameron Kinloch  
Director
Copper Cow Coffee 
CFO 
Weights and Biases, Inc 
SHARE DEALINGS BY DIRECTORS 
In accordance with Section 148(2) of the Companies Act, the 
Board has received disclosures from the directors named 
below of acquisitions or dispositions of relevant interests in 
the Company between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024, and 
details of those dealings were entered in the Company’s 
interests register. The particulars of such disclosures are: 
Susan Paterson  
1.	 Acquired 142,857 ordinary shares at $0.70 per share on 18 
September 2023. 
2.	Acquired 8,039 ordinary shares at $0.70 per share on 2 
October 2023.  
David Green
1.	 Acquired 142,857 ordinary shares at $0.70 per share on 18 
September 2023.  
2.	Acquired 27,143 ordinary shares at $0.70 per share on 20 
September 2023. 
Graham Stuart 
1.	 Acquired 15,379 ordinary shares at $0.70 per share on 18 
September 2023.  
2.	Acquired 50,970 ordinary shares at $0.70 per share on 2 
October 2023. 
Barry Einsig 
1.	 Acquired 73,091 ordinary shares at $0.70 per share on 18 
September 2023.  
Selwyn Pellett 
1.	 Acquired 340,568 ordinary shares at $0.70 per share on 18 
September 2023.  
2.	Acquired 1,013,826 ordinary shares at $0.70 per share 2 
October 2023.  
Sara Gifford 
1.	 Acquired 357,142 ordinary shares at $0.70 per share on 18 
September 2023. 
Use of Company Information 
There were no notices from directors of the Company 
requesting to use Company information received in their 
capacity as directors that would not otherwise have been 
available to them. 
DIRECTORS’ AND OFFICERS’ INSURANCE AND 
INDEMNITY 
EROAD has arranged, as provided for under the Company’s 
constitution, policies of directors’ and officers’ liability 
insurance which, with a Deed of Indemnity entered into 
with all directors, ensures that generally directors will incur 
no monetary loss as a result of actions undertaken by them 
as directors. Certain actions are specifically excluded, for 
example, the incurring of penalties and fines that may be 
imposed in respect of breaches of the law.
DIRECTORS RELEVANT INTERESTS
The following directors held relevant interests in the following 
ordinary shares in the Company as at 31 March 2024: 
Name
Ordinary shares
Susan Paterson
167,457
David Green
170,000 
Graham Stuart 
171,349
Barry Einsig
73,091 
Selwyn Pellett
3,442,887*
Sara Gifford 
357,142 
Cameron Kinloch
-
*Includes shares held by Selwyn Pellett and Tracey Herman as trustees of the 
Selwyn Pellett Family Trust (of which Selwyn Pellett is a beneficiary) and 
Shares held via Sharesies Nominee Limited as custodian. 
ANNUAL SHAREHOLDERS’ MEETING 
EROAD’s 2024 annual shareholders’ meeting will be held at 
1:00pm NZT at Eden Park, Loyalty Lounge, 42 Reimers Ave, 
Kingsland, Auckland 1024, New Zealand and virtually via 
audio visual link on Wednesday 26 June 2024. 
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024

PAGE 146 
PAGE 147
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Holding Range 
Number of holders
%
Number of
ordinary shares
%
1 to 999
1,318
34.48
513,983
0.28
1,000 to 4,999
1,329
34.77
3,062,155 
1.66
5,000 to 9,999
396
10.36
2,728,760 
1.48
10,000 to 49,999
566
14.81
11,828,392 
6.40
50,000 to 99,999
97
2.54
6,665,905 
3.61
100,000 and over
116
3.04
160,021,827 
86.59
Total
3,822 
100
184,821,022 
10044
The details set out above were as at 31 March 2024. The 
Company only has one class of shares on issue, ordinary 
shares, and these shares are quoted on the NZX and ASX 
Main Boards. 
SUBSTANTIAL PRODUCT HOLDERS 
According to notices given under the FMC Act, the 
substantial product holders in ordinary shares (being the only 
class of quoted voting products) of the Company and their 
relevant interests according to the substantial product holder 
noticed filed as at 31 March 2024, were as follows: 
Substantial product holder 
Date of Notice
during FY24 
Number
of shares
% of shares on issue at 
31 March 2024
Brillian APAC Pty Ltd
10/07/2023 
21,198,461 
18.74
Regal Funds Management Pty Ltd 
05/10/2023 
16,634,094 
9.01
National Nominees Ltd ACF Australian Ethical Investment Limited 
05/03/2024 
14,623,500
7.91
Steven Newman and NMC Trustees Limited  
18/01/2024 
13,465,011 
7.29
The total number of ordinary shares (being the only class of 
quoted voting products) on issue in the Company as at 31 
March 2024 was 184,821,022. 
Shareholder 
information
44 Rounded to 100% from 100.01%.
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS 
The names and holdings of the 20 largest registered 
shareholders in the Company as at 31 March 2024 were: 
Holder Name
Shares
%
Citibank Nominees (New Zealand) Limited – NZCSD
22,937,022
12.41
Brillian APAC Pty Ltd 
21,318,415 
11.53 
NMC Trustees Limited
13,112,942 
7.09
HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited 
10,267,757 
5.56
BNP Paribas Nominees (NZ) Limited – NZCSD
9,595,502 
5.19
Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited 
7,735,564 
4.19
Anthony Henry Kandziora
7,000,000
3.79
HSBC Nominees (New Zealand) Limited – NZCSD 
6,143,991
3.32
Accident Compensation Corporation- NZCSD
4,892,765
2.65
FNZ Custodians Limited 
4,875,591
2.64
National Nominees Limited
4.364,228
2.36
New Zealand Depository Nominee Limited
4,007,305
2.17
Selwyn Pellett & Tracey Herman – Selwyn Pellett Family Trust
3,442,877
1.86
JP Morgan Nominees Australia Limited 
2,814,056
1.52
BNP Paribas Nominees Pty Ltd 
2,804,601
1.52
J E & A L Marris Trustees Limited 
2,368,536
1.28
Custodial Services Limited
2,115,139
1.14
BNP Paribas Noms Pty Ltd
1,947,329
1.05
Movac Fund 4 Custodial Limited
1,760,467
0.95
John Grant Sinclair
1,582,861
0.86
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024

PAGE 148 
PAGE 149
NZX WAIVERS 
In relation to the capital raising announced on 7 September 
2023, EROAD was granted a waiver in respect of NZX Listing 
Rule 4.19.1 to the extent that this Rule would prohibit the 
allotment of Shares in respect of subscriptions received from 
Volaris under the Equity Raising later than 10 Business Days 
after the closing date for the Placement and Institutional 
Entitlement Offer. A copy of the waiver is available on 
EROAD’s NZX Announcement page. 
DISCIPLINARY ACTION TAKEN BY THE NZX 
The NZX has not taken any disciplinary action against the 
Company during the year ended 31 March 2024.
AUDITOR’S FEES 
KPMG has continued to act as auditor of EROAD and our 
subsidiaries. The amount payable by EROAD and our 
subsidiaries to KPMG as audit fees during the year ended 
31 March 2024 was $0.6m. The amount of fees payable to 
KPMG for non-audit work during the year ended 31 March 
2024 was $0.4m. Note 5 in the Financial Statements section 
of this Annual Report includes a detailed breakdown of 
auditor’s fees for audit and non-audit work. 
DONATIONS 
EROAD does not make any political donations. We made 
donations totalling $56,000 during the year ended 
31 March 2024.
CREDIT RATING 
EROAD does not currently have a credit rating.
Other
information 
Directory
Registered Office 
in New Zealand 
Registered Office 
in North America
Registered Office 
in Australia  
Level 3, 260 Oteha Valley Road,
Albany, Auckland, New Zealand
15110 Avenue of Science, 
Suite 100, San Diego, 
United States of America 92128
1 Link Road, Zetland, New South 
Wales 2017, Australia 
Investor Relations
and Sustainability 
Enquiries 
Managing your 
Shareholding Online
Share Register -
New Zealand 
EROAD Limited, 
PO Box 305 394 Triton Plaza,
North Shore, 
Auckland
Email: investors@eroad.com 
Telephone: 0800 437 623 
Changes in address and investment 
portfolios can be viewed and 
updated online: 
www.computershare.co.nz/
investorcentre. 
You will need your CSN and FIN 
numbers to access this service.
Computershare Investments Services 
Limited  
Private Bag 92119, Victoria Street 
West  Auckland, 1142 
New Zealand 
Email: enquiry@computershare.co.nz 
Telephone: +64 9 488 8777 
Website: www.computershare.co.nz/
investorcentre 
Legal Advisors 
Bankers
Chapman Tripp, 
Level 34, PwC Tower, 15 Customs 
Street West, Auckland 1010 
PO Box 2206, Auckland 1140 
Bank of New Zealand 
ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd 
Kiwibank Limited  
National Australian Bank 
Wells Fargo 
HSBC 
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024

PAGE 150 
PAGE 151
EROAD ANNUAL REPORT 2024
Glossary
ANNUALISED MONTHLY RECURRING 
REVENUE (AMRR) 
A non-GAAP measure representing monthly Recurring 
Revenue for the last month of the period, multiplied by 12. It 
provides a 12 month forward view of revenue, assuming unit 
numbers, pricing and foreign exchange remain unchanged 
during the year.
ASSET RETENTION RATE 
The number of Total Contracted Units at the beginning of 
the 12 month period and retained as Total Contracted Units 
at the end of the 12 month period, as a percentage of Total 
Contracted Units at the beginning of the 12 month period.
COREHUB 
EROAD’s next generation telematics hardware that collects 
rich data, meets electronic logging device certification.
COSTS TO ACQUIRE CUSTOMERS (CAC)
A non-GAAP measure of costs to acquire customers. Total CAC 
represents all sales & marketing related costs. CAC capitalised 
includes incremental sales commissions for new sales, 
upgrades and renewals which are capitalised and amortised 
over the life of the contract. All other CAC related costs are 
expensed when incurred and included within CAC expensed.
COSTS TO SERVICE & SUPPORT (CTS)
A non-GAAP measure of costs to support and service 
customers. Total CTS represents all customer success 
and product support costs. These costs are included in 
Administrative and other Operating Expenses. 
CALENDAR YEAR (CY)
12 months ended 31 December.
EBITDA 
A non-GAAP measure representing Earnings before Interest, 
Taxation, Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA). Refer 
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income in
Financial Statements.
EBITDA MARGIN 
A non-GAAP measure representing EBITDA divided 
by Revenue.
EHUBO, EHUBO2 and EHUBO 2.2 
EROAD’s first and second generation electronic distance 
recorder which replaces mechanical hubo-dometers. Ehubo 
is a trade mark registered in New Zealand, Australia and the 
United States.
ELECTRONIC LOGGING DEVICE (ELD) 
An electronic solution that synchronises with a vehicle 
engine to automatically record driving time and hours of 
service records.
ENTERPRISE 
A fleet of more than 500 vehicles in North America and more 
than 150 vehicles in Australia or New Zealand.
FREE CASH FLOW 
A non-GAAP measure representing operating cash flow and 
investing cash flow reported in the Statement of Cash Flows.
FUTURE CONTRACTED INCOME (FCI) 
A non-GAAP measure which represents contracted Software 
as a Service (SaaS) income to be recognised as revenue in 
future periods. Refer Revenue Note 2 of the FY23  Financial 
Statements.
FINANCIAL YEAR (FY) 
Financial year ended 31 March.
HALF ONE (H1) 
For the six months ended 30 September. 
HALF TWO (H2) 
For the six months ended 31 March. 
MONTHLY SAAS AVERAGE REVENUE 
PER UNIT (ARPU) 
A non-GAAP measure that is calculated by dividing the total 
SaaS revenue for the year reported in Note 2 of the FY23  
Financial Statements, by the TCU balance at the end of each 
month during the year.
NORMALISED EBITDA 
Excludes one-off items including acquisition accounting 
adjustments ($9.6m) and integration costs ($3.4m). FY22 
normalisations include acquisition accounting revenue 
($1.3m) , due diligence costs ($2.0m), transaction costs 
($1.6m), and integration costs ($4.0m).
NORMALISED EBITDA MARGIN 
Excludes one-off items, consistent with the definition 
provided for Normalised EBITDA
NORMALISED REVENUE 
Excludes the one-off acquisition accounting revenue in FY23 
($9.6m).
ROAD USER CHARGES (RUC) 
In New Zealand, RUC is applicable to Heavy Vehicles and all 
vehicles powered by a fuel not taxed at source. The charges 
are paid into a fund called the National Land Transport Fund, 
which is controlled by NZTA, and go towards the cost of 
repairing the roads.
SAAS 
Software as a Service, a method of software delivery in which 
software is accessed online via a subscription rather than 
bought and installed on individual computers.
SAAS REVENUE 
Software as a service (SaaS) revenue represents revenue 
earned from customer contracts for the sale or rental of 
hardware, installation services and provision of software 
services.
TOTAL CONTRACTED UNITS 
Represents EROAD and Coretex branded units subject to a 
customer contract both on Depot and pending instalment and 
Coretex branded units currently billed.
UNIT 
A communication device fitted in-cab or on a trailer. Where 
there is more than one unit fitted in-cab or on a trailer, it is 
counted as one unit (excluding Philips Connect). 
360 
A web-based platform that allows customers to access data 
collected by CoreHub and the associated reports.