Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Banks - Regional / First Defiance Financial Corp.

First Defiance Financial Corp.

fdef · NASDAQ Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker fdef
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Financial Services
Industry Banks - Regional
Employees 501-1000
← All annual reports
FY2016 Annual Report · First Defiance Financial Corp.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
First Defiance Financial Corp.
601 Clinton Street
Defiance, OH 43512
419-782-5104
Fdef.com 

First Federal Bank of the Midwest
601 Clinton Street
Defiance, OH 43512
419-782-5015
First-Fed.com

First Insurance Group
511 Fifth Street
Defiance, OH 43512
419-784-5431
Firstinsurancegrp.com

2
0
1
6
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

|

F
i
r
s
t
D
e
fi
a
n
c
e
F
n
a
n
c
i
a

i

l

First Defiance Financial Corp.
2016 Annual Report

C
o
r
p

.

For investor relations information, visit Fdef.com

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
to our shareholders

shareholders information

After  a  strong  performance  for  2016,  
I am proud to celebrate our fourth consecutive 
year of record earnings. As we build upon the 
momentum gained over the last several years, 
we have aligned our strategic efforts through 
identified  core  initiatives  and    key  areas  that 
will drive improved financial performance and 
greater shareholder value. We have opportunity 
for  core  balance  sheet  growth  and  will  focus 
on  loan  and  deposit  growth,  in  addition  to 
overall  revenue  growth,  expense  control  and 
improved asset quality. 

Continued  improvement  in  asset  quality  over 
the  course  of  2016  was  encouraging,  and  we 
look  to  carry  that  trend  throughout  2017.  We 
experienced  solid  growth  in  both  loans  and 
deposits in 2016 by concentrating on attracting 
new  relationships  and  strengthening  current 
ones. As for our outlook on 2017, the economy 
continues  to  show  signs  of  improvement, 
with  the  likelihood  of  several  rate  increases 
by  the  Federal  Reserve;  we  are  confident  in 
our  position  to  implement  our  strategy  in  an 
upward rate environment. We aim to carry our
success forward and target strategic objectives 
long-term  goals.  
to  help  us  achieve  our 

Our  first  objective  is  to  continue  to  refine  
our  plan  for  growth  as  we  address  new

Donald P. Hileman
President & CEO

opportunities  for  branch  expansion  with  a 
concentration  on  our  metro  market  areas.  In 
2016,  we  expanded  our  presence  in  Toledo, 
Ohio  with  two  offices  in  low-to-moderate 
income  areas  near  downtown.  We  have 
also  enhanced  our  Columbus,  Ohio  Loan 
Production  Office  to  a  full-service  branch 
and  are  eager  to  serve  our  customers  with  a 
broadened  line  of  products  and  services.  In 
addition,  we  completed  our  acquisition  of 
Commercial  Bancshares,  Inc.  headquartered 
in Upper Sandusky, Ohio and look forward to 
the opportunity to provide these communities 
with smart banking solutions.

Another  identified  objective  is  to  continue 
talent  development  and  retention  of  our 
workforce. We remain confident in our people 
working hard to adapt to overcome obstacles, 
meet our customers’ expectations and execute 
our  strategic  plans  for  continued  success.  
By recruiting and developing high-performing 
innovation, 
individuals,  we  expect  greater 
collaboration  and  efficiency 
throughout  
our organization. 

In  addition,  we  are  focusing  our  efforts  on 
leveraging  technology  to  strengthen  our 
organization’s  productivity  and  utilize  data 
to  customize  solutions  for  our  customers. 
Additionally,  we  will  explore  banking 
enhancements that will attract new customers 
and  improve  the  banking  experience  for  our 
existing  customers  in  a  way  that  matches 
our  overall  risk  profile.  Our  expansions  in 
digital  banking  offerings  have  been  key  to 
differentiating  ourselves 
from  competition 
and  positioning  ourselves  as  a  technology 
leader  amongst  community  banks.  Recent 
include  a  new,  optimized 
enhancements 
website,  tablet  banking  app  for  personal  and 
business  accounts,  expanded  mobile  wallet 
capabilities  with  the  addition  of  Samsung 
Pay  and  Android  PayTM,  improvements  made  
in our online banking platform and biometric 
security  for  our  mobile  app  with  Touch  ID. 
We  will  continue  to  invest  in  opportunities 
that  keep  pace  with  a  rapidly  changing  
digital environment. 

of our customers. As FinTech and other financial 
to  arise,  consumers 
institutions  continue 
have  more options than ever when it comes 
to  conducting  their  finances.  We  want  to  be 
their  financial  institution  of  choice.  Thus,  it  is  
important for us to understand our customers’
needs, eliminate friction and build meaningful 
relationships as a people-focused organization.   

We  believe  that  being  a  community  bank 
makes a difference to our customers and the 
communities  we  serve.  Last  year,  we  hosted 
our  third  annual  Pay  it  Forward  Day.  We  not 
only supported our nearly 600 employees with 
$10 to perform a random act of kindness, we 
also funded 13 Pay It Forward ideas submitted 
by  our  community  members.  First  Federal 
Bank  and  First  Insurance  Group  will  continue 
to embrace our community-minded roots by 
serving the community we live and work in and 
supporting life-changing organizations.  

Our  Mission  is  to  be  a  high  performing 
community  bank  and  agency  so  that  our 
engaged and valued employees provide smart 
solutions to our clients and communities. To do 
so, we have refreshed our core values to reflect 
this  mission.  We  aim  to  develop  our  Trusted 
Advisors  to  serve  others  by  being:  people 
focused,  performance  driven,  community 
minded, innovative and trustworthy. These key 
statements detail our purpose as a community- 
based  organization,  which  above  all  else  is 
to  provide  our  clients  and  community  with 
solutions that fit their needs and add value to 
their lives.

I  thank  you  for  your  continued  confidence  in 
First Defiance. We have grown to approximately
$2.8  billion  in  assets  by  building  upon  a 
smart  decisions,  careful 
foundation  of 
assessments  and  strong  relationships.  Our 
experienced leadership team has positioned us 
to meet opportunities and challenges that 2017 
will bring. We believe the partnership with our 
shareholders, customers, and employees make 
us all stronger. We truly are better together.  

Also  in  2017,  we  have  structured  a  team 
dedicated to gaining a deeper understanding 

Donald P. Hileman 
President & CEO

Annual Meeting
In order to increase shareholder attendance and participation, the Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be conducted virtually at 1:00 p.m. on 
Tuesday, May 9, 2017. Shareholders may access the Annual Meeting by going to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/fdef2017

Investor Information
Shareholders, investors and analysts interested in additional information about First Defiance Financial Corp. may contact Investor Relations 
at the corporate office, 419-782-5104.

Stock Transfer Agent
Shareholders with questions concerning the transfer of shares, lost 
certificates, dividend payments, dividend reinvestment, receipt of multiple 
dividend checks, duplicate mailings or changes of address should contact:

Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions
PO Box 1342
Brentwood, NY 11717
1-844-318-0128 or 1-720-358-3594
shareholder@broadridge.com

Securities Listing
First Defiance Financial Corp. common stock trades on the 
NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol FDEF.  As 
of March 13, 2017, there were approximately 2,813  
stockholders of record and 10,138,581      

   shares outstanding. 

Dividend Policy
The First Defiance Financial Corp. Board reviews and 
determines on a quarterly basis whether to declare a 
dividend. Dividends declared in 2016 totaled $0.880 per share.

Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Shareholders may automatically reinvest dividends in 
additional First Defiance Financial Corp. common stock 
through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, which also provides 
for purchase by voluntary cash contributions. For additional 
information, please contact: Broadridge Corporate Issuer 
Solutions at 1-844-318-0128 or 1-720-358-3594. 

Auditors 
Crowe Horwath LLP 
330 East Jefferson Boulevard 
South Bend, IN 46624

General Counsel
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease LLP
301 East Fourth Street, Suite 3500 
Cincinnati, OH 45202

Total Return Performance

Total Return Performance

l

e
u
l
e
a
u
V
a
V
x
x
e
e
d
n
d
I
n

I

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0
12/31/11

12/31/12

12/31/13

12/31/14

12/31/15

12/31/16

First Defiance Financial Corp. 
NASDAQ Composite 

SNL Bank NASDAQ 
SNL Midwest Thrift

Price Range 
Year Ended December 31, 2016 

First Quarter 

Second Quarter 

Third Quarter 

Fourth Quarter 

Year Ended  
December 31, 2015 

First Quarter 

Second Quarter 

Third Quarter 

Fourth Quarter 

HIGH 
 $40.98  

 $41.21  

 $46.83  

 $52.31  

LOW
$34.80 

$37.53 

$35.90 

$36.91 

HIGH 

  LOW

 $34.64  

 $38.21  

 $39.95  

 $42.46  

$29.05 

$32.42 

$35.03 

$35.01 

 
 
company profile

First Defiance Financial Corp., headquartered in Defiance, Ohio, is the holding company 
for First Federal Bank of the Midwest and First Insurance Group. First Federal Bank operates 
43 full-service branches and numerous ATMs in northwest and central Ohio, southeast 
Michigan and northeast Indiana. First Insurance Group is a full-service insurance agency 
with six offices throughout northwest Ohio.

Founded in the 1920s as Northwest Savings, First Federal Bank was chartered in 1935 as 
a federal mutual savings and loan company. First Federal Bank converted to a mutual 
holding  company  and  issued  its  first  stock  to  the  public  and  employees  in  1993. 
In September 1995, First Federal Bank converted to a full stock company, trading stock 
on  the  NASDAQ  national  market  under  the  ticker  symbol  FDEF.  At  the  same  time,  
First  Defiance  Financial  Corp.  was  founded  as  the  holding  company  for  First  Federal 
Bank. In 1998, an additional business line was added with the acquisition of an insurance 
agency,  now  known  as  First  Insurance  Group.  The  Bank’s  name  was  changed  to  
First  Federal  Bank  of  the  Midwest  in  1999,  to  better  reflect  our  community  banking 
business strategy.

Since  2003,  First  Defiance  has  acquired  three  banking  offices,  opened  nine  de  novo 
offices,  acquired  four  insurance  agencies  and  completed  acquisitions  of  ComBanc, 
Inc. based in Delphos, Ohio; Genoa Savings and Loan based in Genoa, Ohio; Pavilion 
Bancorp,  based  in  Adrian,  Michigan;  and  Commercial  Bancshares,  Inc.  based  in  
Upper Sandusky, Ohio. 

safe harbor statement

Statements contained in this Annual Report may not be based on historical facts and are 
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act 
of 1933, as amended, and Section 21B of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended. Actual 
results could vary materially depending on risks and uncertainties inherent in general 
and local banking and insurance conditions, competitive factors specific to markets in 
which the Company and its subsidiaries operate, future interest rate levels, legislative 
and  regulatory  decisions  or  capital  market  conditions.  The  Company  assumes  no 
responsibility to update this information. For more details, please refer to the Company’s 
SEC filings, including its most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports 
on Form 10-Q.

financial highlights (In thousands, except per share amounts)

Summary of Operating Results

2016

2015 % Change

Net interest income

Provision for loan losses

Non-interest income (excluding securities gains/losses)

Securities gains (losses)

Non-interest expense

Net income
Balance Sheet Data

Total assets

Loans, net

Deposits

Stockholders' equity

Allowance for loan losses

Share Information

Basic earnings per common share

Diluted earnings per common share

Dividends per common share

Tangible book value per common share

Shares outstanding at end of period

Key Ratios

Average net interest margin

Return on average assets

Return on average equity

Efficiency ratio

 $78,943 

 $74,055 

 283 

 33,521 

 509 

 71,093 

 28,843 

2016

 136 

 31,781 

6.6%

108.1%

5.5%

 22 

2,213.6%

 67,889 

 26,423 

4.7%

9.2%

2015 % Change

 $2,477,597 

 $2,297,676 

 1,914,603 

 1,776,835 

 1,981,628 

 1,836,137 

 293,018 

 25,884 

 280,197 

 25,382 

7.8%

7.8%

7.9%

4.6%

2.0%

2016

 $3.21 

 3.19 

 0.880 

 25.59 

 8,983 

2016

3.74%

1.20%

10.10%

62.20%

2015 % Change

 $2.87 

 2.82 

 0.775 

 23.79 

 9,102 

11.9%

13.1%

13.6%

7.6%

-1.3%

2015 % Change

3.81%

1.19%

9.52%

63.01%

-1.8%

0.8%

6.1%

-1.3%

financials at a glance

Diluted Earnings Per Share

Dividends Per Share 

0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1

12 

13 

14 

15  16

12 

13 

14 

15  16

Loans (in millions)

Deposits (in millions)

2,250
2,000
1,750
1,500
1,250
1,000
750
500
250

12 

13 

14 

15  16

12 

13 

14 

15  16

Return on Average Assets (percent)

Return on Average Equity (percent)

18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2

12 

13 

14 

15  16

12 

13 

14 

15  16

3.6
3.2
2.8
2.4
2.0
1.6
1.2
.8
.4

2,250
2,000
1,750
1,500
1,250
1,000
750
500
250

1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20

Board of Directors
William J. Small 
Chairman, 
First Defiance Financial Corp. 
1, 5, 6, 7 & 8

Donald P. Hileman 
President &  
Chief Executive Officer, 
First Defiance Financial Corp. 
1, 5, 6, 7 & 8

Stephen L. Boomer 
Vice Chairman & Lead Director, 
First Defiance Financial Corp. 
Retired President &  
Chief Executive Officer,  
Arps Dairy, Inc. 
Defiance, Ohio 
1, 2, 3, 4, 6 & 7

John L. Bookmyer 
Chief Executive Officer, 
Pain Management Group 
Findlay, Ohio 
2, 3 & 5

Douglas A. Burgei, D.V.M. 
Veterinarian, 
Napoleon, Ohio 
4, 5 & 8

Robert E. Beach 
Retired President & CEO, 
Commercial Bancshares, Inc.  
Upper Sandusky, Ohio 
5, 6 & 8

Jean A. Hubbard 
Business Manager &  
Corporate Treasurer, 
The Hubbard Company 
Defiance, Ohio 
2, 3 & 8

Barbara A. Mitzel 
Director of Public Affairs, 
Consumers Energy 
Adrian, Michigan 
4, 5 & 6

Charles D. Niehaus 
Managing Partner, 
Niehaus & Associates, Ltd. 
Toledo, Ohio 
2, 4 & 8

Thomas A. Reineke 
President and CEO, 
Reineke Family Dealerships 
Findlay, Ohio 
4, 6 & 8

Samuel S. Strausbaugh 
President,  
Chief Executive Officer & 
Chief Financial Officer, 
JB & Company, Inc. 
Tiffin, Ohio 
2, 3, 7 & 8

Key for Board of Directors:
1. Executive Committee 
2. Audit Committee
3. Compensation Committee
4. Corporate Governance  

5. Investment Committee
6. Trust Committee
7.  First Insurance Group Board
8. Risk Committee

Committee

First Insurance Group, Inc.  
Corporate Officers
Donald P. Hileman 
Chief Executive Officer 

Michael R. Klein 
President &  
Chief Operating Officer

Marvin K. Dubbs, Jr. 
Executive Vice President, 
Property & Casualty 

Kenneth G. Keller 
Executive Vice President,  
Group Health & Life

John Payak, III 
Executive Vice President, 
Property & Casualty

Tim Whetstone 
Executive Vice President, 
Property & Casualty

Lawrence H. Woods 
Executive Vice President,  
Property & Casualty

First Federal Bank of the Midwest 
Corporate Officers
Donald P. Hileman 
President &  
Chief Executive Officer

Brent L. Beard 
Senior Vice President, 
Controller

Kevin T. Thompson 
Executive Vice President,  
Chief Financial Officer

John R. Reisner 
Executive Vice President,  
Chief Risk Officer &  
Legal Counsel

Craig A. Curtis 
Senior Vice President, 
Commercial Lending

Amy M. Daeger 
Senior Vice President,  
Director of Retail 
Administration

Sharon L. Davis 
Executive Vice President,  
Director of Human Resources

Brian A. Eitniear 
Senior Vice President,  
Director of Corporate Services

Gregory R. Allen 
Executive Vice President,  
Community Banking  
President

Dennis E. Rose, Jr. 
Executive Vice President,  
Director of Strategy  
Management

Michael D. Mulford 
Executive Vice President,  
Chief Credit Officer

Amy L. Hackenberg 
Executive Vice President,  
Southern Market Area President

Timothy K. Harris 
Executive Vice President,  
Eastern Market Area President

Marybeth Shunck 
Executive Vice President,  
Northern Market Area President

James R. Williams, III 
Executive Vice President,  
Western Market Area President

David D. Dygert 
Executive Vice President, 
Columbus Market Executive

Charles V. Hoecherl 
Senior Vice President,  
Treasury Management Sales 

David L. Kondas 
Senior Vice President,  
Director of Wealth 
Management

Kathleen A. Miller 
Senior Vice President,  
Information Technology

Dirk VanHeyst 
Senior Vice President,  
City Executive

Ryan J. Miller 
Senior Vice President,  
Northern Market Area 
Commercial Lending  
Manager

Martha J. Woelke 
Senior Vice President,  
Retail Lending;  
Business Banking

Danielle R. Figley 
Corporate Secretary

First Defiance Financial Corp. 
Corporate Officers
Donald P. Hileman 
President &  
Chief Executive Officer

John R. Reisner 
Executive Vice President,  
Chief Risk Officer &  
Legal Counsel

Danielle R. Figley 
Corporate Secretary

Kevin T. Thompson 
Executive Vice President,  
Chief Financial Officer

Sharon L. Davis 
Executive Vice President,  
Director of Human Resources  

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
_____________
FORM 10-K  

(Mark One)
[  X  ] 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES 

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

For the fiscal year Ended 

December 31, 2016 

or

[ 

]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Commission File Number 

0-26850

_____________

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_____________

OHIO
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
601 Clinton Street, Defiance, Ohio
(Address of principal executive offices)

34-1803915
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
43512
(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (419) 782-5015
_______________

    Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share 
(Title of Class)

The NASDAQ Stock Market 

(Name of each exchange on which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
_______________

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [     ] 
No [  X  ]

Indicate by check mark if registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. 
Yes [     ]  No [  X  ]

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  Registrant  (1)  has  filed  all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [     ]

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  has  submitted  electronically  and  posted  on  its  corporate  Website,  if  any,  every 
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the 
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes [ X ] No [    ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not 
be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III 
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  []

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  Registrant  is  a  large  accelerated  filer,  an  accelerated  filer,  a  non-accelerated  filer,  or  a  smaller 
reporting company.  See definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of 
the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  [   ]

Accelerated filer  [ X ]       Non-accelerated filer  [   ]

Smaller reporting Company   [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  [    ] 
No [  X  ]

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant computed by reference to the average bid and 
ask price of such stock as of June 30, 2016 was approximately $338.8 million.

As of February 20, 2017, there were issued and outstanding 8,985,385 shares of the Registrant’s common stock.

Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates by reference certain information from the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2017 
Annual Shareholders’ Meeting.

- 1 -

Documents Incorporated by Reference

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
First Defiance Financial Corp.
Annual Report on Form 10-K

Table of Contents

Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer 

Purchases of Equity Securities

Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial 
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related 

Stockholder Matters

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Page

3
23
28
28
30
30

30
33
34
54
57

127
127
127

127
128

128
128
128

129

130

PART I
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.

PART II
Item 5.

Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.

Item 9A.
Item 9B.

PART III
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.

Item 13.  
Item 14.

PART IV
Item 15.

SIGNATURES

- 2 - 

- 2 -

Item 1. Business

PART I

First  Defiance  Financial  Corp.  (“First  Defiance”  or  “the  Company”)  is  a  unitary  thrift  holding 
company  that,  through  its  subsidiaries,  First  Federal  Bank  of  the  Midwest  (“First  Federal” or  “the 
Bank”),  First  Insurance  Group  of  the  Midwest,  Inc. (“First  Insurance”),  and  First  Defiance  Risk 
Management  Inc.    (collectively,  “the  Subsidiaries”),  focuses  on  traditional  banking  and  property  and 
casualty, life and group health insurance products. 

The Company’s philosophy is to grow and prosper, building long-term relationships based on top 
quality  service,  high  ethical  standards  and  safe  and  sound  assets.  The  Company  operates  as  a  locally 
oriented,  community-based  financial  services  organization,  augmented  by  experienced,  centralized 
support  in  select  critical  areas.  The  Company’s  local  market  orientation  is  reflected  in  its market  area 
management and local advisory boards, which are comprised of local business persons, professionals and 
other community representatives that assist area management in responding to local banking needs. 

The  Company’s  operating  objectives  include  expansion,  diversification  within  its  markets, 
growth of its fee-based income and growth organically and through acquisitions of financial institutions, 
branches and financial services businesses. The Company seeks merger or acquisition partners that are 
culturally similar, have experienced management and possess either significant market area presence or 
have  the  potential  for  improved  profitability  through  financial  management,  economies  of  scale  and 
expanded services. The Company regularly evaluates merger and acquisition opportunities and conducts 
due  diligence  activities  related  to  possible  transactions  with  other  financial  institutions.  As  a  result, 
merger or acquisition discussions and, in some cases, negotiations may take place and future mergers or 
acquisitions  involving  cash,  debt  or  equity  securities  may  occur.  Acquisitions  typically  involve  the 
payment  of  premiums  over  book  and  market  values  and,  therefore,  some  dilution  of  the  Company’s 
tangible book value and net income per common share may occur in any future transaction.   

On  August  23,  2016,  First  Defiance  announced  the  execution  of  a  definitive  agreement  (the
“Agreement”) to acquire Commercial Bancshares, Inc. (“Commercial Bancshares”) and its wholly-owned 
subsidiary,  the  Commercial  Savings  Bank.    Each  Commercial  Bancshares  shareholder  will  receive 
1.1808  shares  of  First  Defiance  common  stock  (“First  Defiance Shares”)  or  $51.00  in  cash,  subject  to 
total  consideration  being  paid  80%  in  First  Defiance  Shares  and  20%  in  cash  as  provided  in  the 
Agreement.    Based  on  the  twenty-day  average  closing price of First Defiance Shares of $43.19 ending 
August 22, 2016, the transaction is valued at approximately $63.0 million in the aggregate, including a 
cash  payment  of  approximately  $1.5  million  to  cancel  outstanding  options.    On  December  31,  2016, 
Commercial Bancshares had $356 million in assets, $297 million in loans and $314 million in deposits at 
its seven banking offices. The transaction closed on February 24, 2017.  

At  December  31,  2016,  the  Company  had  consolidated  assets  of  $2.48 billion,  consolidated 
deposits  of  $1.98 billion,  and  consolidated  stockholders’  equity  of  $293.0 million.  The  Company  was 
incorporated  in  Ohio  in  June  of  1995.  Its  principal  executive  offices  are  located  at 601 Clinton Street, 
Defiance, Ohio 43512, and its telephone number is (419) 782-5015. 

First  Defiance's  website,  www.fdef.com, contains  a  hyperlink  under  the  Investor  Relations 
section to EDGAR, where  the  annual  report  on  Form  10-K,  quarterly  reports  on  Form  10-Q,  current 
reports  on  Form  8-K  and  amendments  to  those  reports  filed  or  furnished  pursuant  to  Section  13(a)  or 
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  are  available  free  of  charge  as  soon  as  reasonably 
practicable  after  First  Defiance  has  filed  the  report  with  the  United  State  Securities  and  Exchange 
Commission (“SEC”).

- 3 - 

- 3 -

The Subsidiaries

The Company’s core business operations are conducted through its Subsidiaries:

First  Federal  Bank  of  the  Midwest: First  Federal  is  a  federally  chartered  stock  savings  bank 
headquartered in Defiance, Ohio. It conducts operations through twenty-seven full-service banking center 
offices in Allen, Defiance, Fulton, Hancock, Henry, Lucas, Ottawa, Paulding, Putnam, Seneca, Williams 
and  Wood  counties  in  northwest  Ohio, two  full-service  banking  center  offices  in  Allen  County  in 
northeast Indiana, five full-service banking center offices in Lenawee County in southeast Michigan and 
one commercial loan production office in Hilliard, Ohio that was approved in August 2016 to become a 
full-service  branch.    The  Hilliard  location  is  expected  to  open  as  a  full-service  branch  late  in  the  first 
quarter of 2017.  

First  Federal  is  primarily  engaged  in  community  banking.  It  attracts  deposits  from  the  general 
public through its offices and website, and uses those and other available sources of funds to originate 
residential  real  estate  loans,  commercial real  estate  loans, commercial  loans,  home  improvement  and 
home  equity  loans  and  consumer  loans.  In  addition,  First  Federal  invests  in  U.S.  Treasury  and  federal 
government agency obligations, obligations of the State of Ohio and its political subdivisions, mortgage-
backed securities that are issued by federal agencies, including real estate mortgage investment conduits 
(“REMICs”)  and  residential  collateralized  mortgage  obligations  (“CMOs”), and  corporate  bonds.  First 
Federal’s deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). First Federal is a 
member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) System.

First  Insurance  Group  of  the  Midwest:    First  Insurance  is  a  wholly  owned  subsidiary  of  First 
Defiance.  First  Insurance  is  an  insurance  agency  that  conducts  business  through  offices  located  in  the 
Defiance, Maumee, Oregon, Bryan, Lima and Bowling Green, Ohio areas. First Insurance offers property 
and casualty insurance, life insurance and group health insurance.  

First  Defiance  Risk  Management:    First  Defiance Risk  Management  was  incorporated  on 
December  20,  2012,  as  a  wholly-owned  insurance  company  subsidiary  of  the  Company  to  insure  the 
Company  and  the  Subsidiaries  against  certain  risks  unique  to  the  operations  of  the  Company  and  for 
which  insurance  may  not  be  currently  available  or  economically  feasible  in  today’s  insurance 
marketplace.    First  Defiance  Risk  Management  pools  resources  with  several  other  similar  insurance 
company subsidiaries of financial institutions to spread a limited amount of risk among themselves.

Business Strategy

First Defiance’s primary objective is to be a high-performing community banking organization, 
well  regarded  in  its market areas. First Defiance accomplishes this through emphasis on local decision 
making  and  empowering  its employees  with  tools  and  knowledge  to  serve  its customers’  needs.  First 
Defiance  believes  in  a  “Customer  First”  philosophy  that  is  strengthened  by  its Mission  &  Vision  and 
Core  Values initiatives.  First  Defiance also  has  a  tagline  of  “Better  Together”  as  an  indication  of  its
commitment  to  local,  responsive,  personalized  service.  First  Defiance  believes  this  strategy  results  in 
greater  customer  loyalty  and  profitability  through  core  relationships.  First  Defiance  is focused  on 
diversification of revenue sources and increased market penetration in areas where the growth potential 
exists for a balance between acquisition and organic growth. The primary elements of First Defiance’s
business  strategy  are commercial  banking,  consumer  banking,  including  the  origination  and  sale  of 
single-family  residential  loans,  enhancement  of  fee  income,  wealth  management  and  insurance  sales, 
each united by a strong customer service culture throughout the organization. 

Commercial and Commercial Real Estate Lending - Commercial and commercial real estate 
lending  have  been  an  ongoing  focus  and  a  major  component  of  First  Federal’s success.  First  Federal
provides  primarily  commercial  real  estate  and  commercial  business  loans  with  an  emphasis  on  owner- 

- 4 - 

- 4 -

occupied  commercial  real  estate  and  commercial  business  lending,  including a  focus  on  the  deposit 
balances  that  accompany  these  relationships.  First  Federal’s client  base  tends  to  be  small  to  middle 
market  customers  with  annual  gross  revenues  generally  between  $1  million  and  $50  million.  First 
Federal’s  focus  is also on securing multiple guarantors in addition to collateral where possible.  These 
customers require First Federal to have a high degree of knowledge and understanding of their business 
in  order  to  provide  them  with  solutions  to  their financial  needs.  First  Federal’s  “Customer  First” 
philosophy and culture complements this need of its clients. First Federal believes this personal service 
model differentiates First Federal from its competitors, particularly the larger regional institutions. First 
Federal offers a wide variety of products to support commercial clients including remote deposit capture 
and  other  cash  management  services.  First  Federal  also  believes  that  the  small  business  customer  is  a 
strong market for First Federal. First Federal participates in many of the Small Business Administration 
lending  programs.  Maintaining  a  diversified  portfolio  with  an  emphasis  on  monitoring  industry 
concentrations and reacting to changes in the credit characteristics of industries is an ongoing focus.  

Consumer  Banking  -  First  Federal  offers  customers  a  full  range  of  deposit  and  investment 
products  including  demand,  checking,  money  market,  certificates  of  deposits,  Certificate  of  Deposit 
Account  Registry  Service  (“CDARS”) and  savings  accounts. First  Federal offers  a  full  range  of 
investment  products  through  the  wealth  management  department  and  a  wide  variety  of  consumer  loan 
products,  including  residential  mortgage  loans,  home  equity  loans,  and  installment  loans.  First  Federal
also offers online banking services, which include mobile banking and online bill-pay.

Fee Income Development - Generation of fee income and the diversification of revenue sources 
are accomplished through the mortgage banking operation, First Insurance and the wealth management 
department as First Defiance seeks to reduce reliance on retail transaction fee income. 

Deposit Growth - First Federal’s focus has been to grow core deposits with an emphasis on total 
relationship  banking  with  both  our  retail  and  commercial  customers.  First  Federal’s pricing  strategy 
considers  the  whole  relationship  of  the  customer.  First  Federal  continues  to  focus  on  increasing  its
market  share  in  the  communities  it  serves  by  providing  quality  products  with  extraordinary  customer 
service,  business development  strategies  and  branch  expansion.  First  Federal will  look  to  grow  its
footprint in areas believed to further complement its overall market share and complement its strategy of 
being a high-performing community bank. 

Asset Quality - Maintaining a strong credit culture is of the utmost importance to First Federal.
First Federal has maintained a strong credit approval and review process that has allowed the Company
to maintain a credit quality standard that balances the return with the risks of industry concentrations and 
loan  types.  First  Federal  is  primarily  a  collateral  lender  with  an  emphasis  on  cash  flow  performance,
while obtaining additional support from personal guarantees and secondary sources of repayment. First 
Federal  has directed  its  attention  to loan  types  and  markets  that  it  knows  well  and  in  which  it  has
historically  been  successful.  First  Federal  strives  to  have  loan  relationships  that  are  well  diversified  in 
both size and industry, and monitors the overall trends in the portfolio to maintain its industry and loan 
type  concentration  targets.  First  Federal  maintains  a  problem  loan  remediation  process  that  focuses  on 
detection and resolution. First Federal maintains a strong process of internal control that subjects the loan 
portfolio to periodic internal reviews as well as independent third-party loan review.     

Expansion  Opportunities  - First  Defiance believes  it is well  positioned  to  take  advantage  of 
acquisitions  or  other  business  opportunities  in  its market  areas.  First  Defiance  believes it  has a  track 
record  of  successfully  accomplishing  both  acquisitions  and  de  novo  branching  in  its market  area.  This 
track  record  puts  the  Company in  a  solid  position  to  enter  or  expand  its  business.  First  Defiance will 
continue  to  be  disciplined  as  well  as  opportunistic  in  its approach  to  future  acquisitions  and  de  novo 
branching  with  a  focus  on  its primary  geographic  market  area,  which  it  knows  well, and  has  been 
competing in for a long period of time, as well as surrounding market areas.

- 5 - 

- 5 -

Securities

First Defiance’s securities portfolio is managed in accordance with a written policy adopted by 
the  Board  of  Directors  and  administered  by  the Investment Committee. The Chief Financial Officer of 
First Federal, Controller of First Federal, and the Chief Administration Officer of First Federal can each 
approve  transactions  up  to  $3.0 million.  Two  of  the  three  officers  are  required  to  approve  transactions 
between $3.0 million and $5.0 million. All transactions in excess of $5.0 million must be approved by the 
Board of Directors. 

First Defiance’s investment portfolio includes 61 CMO issues totaling $63.0 million, all of which 
are fully amortizing securities.  Management does not believe the risks associated with any of its CMO
investments  are  significantly  different  from  risks  associated  with  other  pass-through  mortgage-backed 
securities. First Defiance did not have any off-balance sheet derivative securities at December 31, 2016. 

Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase. 
Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity when First Defiance has the positive intent and ability to 
hold  the  securities  to  maturity.  Held-to-maturity  securities  are  stated  at  amortized  cost.  Debt  securities 
not classified as held-to-maturity and equity securities are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-
sale securities are stated at fair value. 

The carrying value of securities at December 31, 2016 by contractual maturity is shown below. 
Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or 
prepay  obligations  with  or  without  call  or  prepayment  penalties.  For  purposes  of  the  maturity  table, 
mortgage-backed  securities,  which  are  not  due  at  a  single  maturity  date,  have  been  allocated  over 
maturity  groupings  based  on  the  weighted-average  contractual  maturities  of  underlying  collateral.  The 
mortgage-backed  securities  may  mature  earlier  than  their  weighted-average  contractual  maturities 
because of principal prepayments.

Contractually Maturing

Total

Weighted
Under 1 Average

Year

Rate

1 - 5
Years

Weighted
Average
Rate

6-10
Years

Weighted
Weighted
Average Over 10 Average
Years

Rate

Rate

Amount

Yield

Mortgage-backed 

securities

CMOs
U.S. government and

federal agency
obligations

Obligations of states and

political subdivisions (1)

Corporate bonds
Total
Unamortized premiums/ 

(discounts)

Unrealized gain on 

securities available
for sale and 
unrecognized gain on 
held to maturity

Total

$ 8,737
9,414

3.20% $32,915
30,164
2.97

3.14% $23,769
20,944
2.87

3.07% $14,639
3,429
2.78

3.03% $ 80,060
63,951
2.79

3.11%
2.85

(Dollars in Thousands)

-

-

2,000

578
-
$ 18,729

1.56
-

9,923
10,020
$ 85,022

1.50

3.69
1.79

2,000

36,202
2,899
$ 85,814

2.00

3.72
2.06

-

39,345
-
$ 57,413

-

-

3.43

4,000

1.75

86,048
12,919
$ 246,978

3.58
1.85

3,422

776
$ 251,176

(1) Tax  exempt  yield  based  on  effective  tax  rate  of  35%.  Actual  coupon  rate  is  approximately  equal  to  the  weighted  average  rate 

disclosed in the table times 65%.

- 6 - 

- 6 -

The carrying value of investment securities is as follows: 

Available-for-sale securities:

Obligations of U.S. government corporations and 

agencies

Obligations of state and political subdivisions
CMOs, REMICS and mortgage-backed securities
Trust preferred stock and preferred stock
Corporate bonds

Total

Held-to-maturity securities:

Mortgage-backed securities
Obligations of state and political subdivisions

Total

$

$

$

$

2016

December 31
2015
(In Thousands)

2014

3,915
88,043
146,019
2
13,013
250,992

$        2,994
90,389
138,074
1
4,977
$    236,435

$        980
88,532
142,816
1
6,992
$    239,321

91
93
184

$          119
124
$          243

$          158
155
313

$

For  additional  information  regarding  First  Defiance’s  investment  portfolio, refer  to  Note 5  – 

Investment Securities to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest-Bearing Deposits

The  Company  had  $46.0  million  and  $41.0  million  in  overnight  investments  at  the  Federal 
Reserve  at  December  31,  2016 and  2015,  respectively,  which  amount  is  included  in  interest-bearing 
deposits.  First  Defiance  had  interest-earning  deposits  in  the  FHLB  of  Cincinnati  and  other  financial 
institutions amounting to $1.8 million and $1.6 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Residential Loan Servicing Activities

Servicing mortgage loans for investors involves a contractual right to receive a fee for processing 
and  administering  loan  payments  on  mortgage  loans  that  are  not  owned  by  the  Company  and  are  not 
included  on  the  Company’s  balance  sheet.  This  processing  involves  collecting  monthly  mortgage 
payments  on  behalf  of  investors,  reporting  information  to  those  investors  on  a  monthly  basis  and 
maintaining custodial escrow accounts for the payment of principal and interest to investors and property 
taxes  and  insurance  premiums  on  behalf  of  borrowers.  At  December  31,  2016,  First  Federal  serviced 
14,350 loans  totaling  $1.37 billion.  The  vast  majority  of  the  loans  serviced  for  others  are  fixed  rate 
conventional  mortgage  loans.  The  Company  primarily  sells  its  loans  to  Freddie  Mac,  Fannie  Mae  and 
FHLB.  At December 31, 2016, 64.82%, 34.31% and 0.81% of the Company’s sold loans were to Freddie 
Mac, Fannie Mae and FHLB, respectively.

As  compensation  for  its  mortgage  servicing  activities,  the  Company  receives  servicing  fees, 
usually  approximating  0.25%  per  annum  of  the  loan  balances  serviced,  plus  any  late  charges collected 
from delinquent borrowers and other fees incidental to the services provided. In the event of a default by 
the borrower, the Company receives no servicing fees until the default is cured.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the number and aggregate principal 
balance of the mortgage loans serviced by the Company, including both fixed and adjustable rate loans, 
at various interest rates:

- 7 - 

- 7 -

2016

December 31

2015

Percentage

Percentage

2014

Number
of
Loans

Rate

Aggregate of Aggregate Number Aggregate of Aggregate Number Aggregate
Principal
Principal
Principal
Balance
Balance
Balance

Principal
Balance

Principal
Balance

of
Loans

of
Loans

Percentage
of Aggregate
Principal
Balance

(Dollars in Thousands)

Less than 3.00%
3.00% -3.99%
4.00% -4.99%
5.00% - 5.99%
6.00% - 6.99%
7.00% and over
Total

2,191
6,279
3,551
1,405
749
175
14,350

$   225,328
682,157
332,023
83,775
41,055
7,680
$ 1,372,018

16.42%
49.72
24.20
6.11
2.99
0.56

1,836
5,606
3,924
1,761
922
209
100.00% 14,258

$ 188,916
603,875
379,917
110,616
50,937
9,461
$1,343,722

14.06%
44.94
28.28
8.23
3.79
0.70
100.00%

1,807
4,985
3,952
2,200
1,086
237
14,267

$ 194,998
544,117
386,949
147,057
62,379
11,138
$1,346,638

14.48%
40.41
28.73
10.92
4.63
0.83
100.00%

Loan servicing fees decrease as the principal balance on the outstanding loan decreases and as 

the remaining time to maturity of the loan shortens.  

The  following  table  sets  forth  certain  information  regarding  the  remaining  maturity  of  the 

mortgage loans serviced by the Company as of the dates shown.

2016

December 31
2015

Number 
of Loans

% of 
Number  
of Loans

Unpaid 
Principal 
Amount

Maturity

% of 
Unpaid 
Principal 
Amount

Number 
of Loans

% of 
Number 
of Loans

Unpaid 
Principal 
Amount

(Dollars in Thousands)

% of
Unpaid 
Principal 
Amount

2014

Number 
of Loans

% of 
Number 
of Loans

Unpaid 
Principal
Amount

% of 
Unpaid 
Principal 
Amount

1–5 years
6–10 years
11–15 years
16–20 years
21–25 years
More than 25 

years

Total

529
1,784
3,671
1,526
1,846

4,994

14,350

3.69% $

12.43
25.58
10.63
12.86

7,432
102,132
343,750
135,540
169,496

0.54%
7.44
25.05
9.88
12.35

680
1,563
3,759
1,635
1,833

34.81
100.00% $1,372,018 100.00% 14,258

613,668

44.74

4,788

4.77% $

10.97
26.36
11.47
12.85

33.58

10,801
89,364
349,986
144,249
169,889

0.80%
6.65
26.05
10.74
12.64

810
1,204
4,082
1,720
1,575

5.67% $
8.44
28.61
12.06
11.04

15,932
64,979
385,409
155,783
143,062

1.18%
4.83
28.62
11.57
10.62

579,433

43.12

4,876

34.18

581,473

43.18

100.00% $1,343,722 100.00%

14,267

100.00% $1,346,638

100.00%

Lending Activities

General – A savings bank generally may not make loans to one borrower and related entities in 
an amount which exceeds 15% of its unimpaired capital and surplus, although loans in an amount equal 
to an additional 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus may be made to a borrower if the loans are fully 
secured  by  readily  marketable  collateral.  Real  estate  is  not  considered  “readily  marketable  collateral.” 
Certain types of loans are not subject to these limits. In applying these limits, loans to certain borrowers 
may be aggregated. Notwithstanding the specified limits, a savings bank may lend to one borrower up to 
$500,000 “for any purpose.” At December 31, 2016, First Federal’s limit on loans-to-one borrower was 
$40.3 million  and  its  five  largest  loans  (including available  lines  of  credit)  or  groups  of  loans  to  one 
borrower, including related entities, were $23.6 million, $23.3 million, $23.1 million, $23.1 million and 
$22.9 million. All of these loans or groups of loans were performing in accordance with their terms at 
December 31, 2016.

Loan Portfolio Composition – The net increase in net loans receivable over the prior year was
$137.8 million,  $154.8 million  and $66.5 million at December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. 
The  loan  portfolio  contains  no  foreign  loans.  The  Company’s  loan  portfolio  is  concentrated 
geographically  in  the  northwest  Ohio,  northeast  Indiana,  central  Ohio and  southeast  Michigan  market 
areas.  Management  has  identified  lending  for  income  generating  rental  properties  as  an  industry 
concentration. Total loans for income generating property totaled $687.5 million at December 31, 2016,
which represents 33.8% of the Company’s loan portfolio.  

- 8 - 

- 8 -

 
 
The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio by type of loan at 

the dates indicated.

2016

2015

December 31
2014

2013

2012

Amount

%

Amount

%

Amount

%

Amount

%

Amount

%

(Dollars in Thousands)

$

207,550

10.2% $

205,330

11.0% $

206,437

12.2% $

195,752

12.2% $

200,826

13.0%

196,983
843,579
182,886
1,430,998

9.7
41.5
9.0
70.4

167,558
780,870
163,877
1,317,635

9.0
41.8
8.7
70.5

156,530
683,958
112,385
1,159,310

9.3
40.6
6.7
68.8

148,952
670,666
86,058
1,101,428

9.2
41.6
5.3
68.3

122,275
675,110
37,788
1,035,999

7.9
43.7
2.5
67.1

469,055
118,429
16,680
604,164
2,035,162

23.0
5.8
0.8
29.6

419,349
116,962
16,281
552,592
100.0% 1,870,227

399,730
22.4
111,813
6.2
15,466
0.9
527,009
29.5
100.0% 1,686,319

23.7
6.6
0.9
31.2
100.0%

388,236
106,930
16,902
512,068

24.1
6.6
1.0
31.7

383,817
108,718
15,936
508,471

24.9
7.0
1.0
32.9

1,613,496 100.0%

1,544,470 100.0%

Real estate:

1-4 family residential
Multi-family
residential 

Commercial real estate  
Construction

Total real estate loans

Other:

Commercial 
Home equity and improvement
Consumer finance

Total loans
Less:

Undisbursed loan funds
Net deferred loan origination 

93,355
1,320

fees

Allowance for loan losses

Net loans

25,884
$ 1,914,603

66,902
1,108

25,382
$ 1,776,835

38,653
880

24,766
$ 1,622,020

32,290
758

24,950
$ 1,555,498

18,478
735

26,711
$ 1,498,546

In  addition  to  the  loans  reported  above,  First  Defiance  had  $9.6  million,  $5.5  million,  $4.5
million, $9.1 million, and $22.1 million in loans classified as held for sale at December 31, 2016, 2015, 
2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The fair value of such loans, which are all single-family residential 
mortgage loans, approximated their carrying value for all years presented.

Contractual  Principal,  Repayments  and  Interest  Rates  – The  following  table  sets  forth 
certain  information  at  December 31,  2016 regarding the dollar amount of gross loans maturing in First 
Defiance’s portfolio, based on the contractual terms to maturity. Demand loans, loans having no stated 
schedule of repayments and no stated maturity, and overdrafts are reported as due in one year or less.

Years After December 31, 2016

Due Less
than 1

Due 1-2

Due 3-5

Due 5-10
(In Thousands)

Due 10-15

Due 15+

Total

$ 471,363

$ 164,604

$ 608,344

$

88,086

$

31,425

$

67,176

$1,430,998

316,760

50,152

94,636

7,507

-

-

469,055

109,651
6,726
$ 904,500

2,410
3,531
$ 220,697

4,044
6,194
$ 713,218

1,452
223
97,268

$

425
6
31,856

$

447
-
67,623

118,429
16,680
$2,035,162

$

Real estate
Other loans:

Commercial
Home equity and 
improvement
Consumer finance

Total

The schedule above does not reflect the actual life of the Company’s loan portfolio. The average 
life  of  loans  is  substantially  less  than  their  contractual  terms  because  of  prepayments and  due-on-sale 
clauses, which give First Defiance the right to declare a conventional loan immediately due and payable 
in the event, among other things, that the borrower sells the real property subject to the mortgage and the 
loan is not repaid. 

- 9 - 

- 9 -

The  following  table  sets  forth  the  dollar  amount  of  gross  loans  due  after  one  year  from 

December 31, 2016 which have fixed interest rates or which have floating or adjustable interest rates. 

Real estate
Commercial
Other

Fixed
Rates

Floating or
Adjustable 
Rates
(In Thousands)

Total

$ 289,578
114,463
17,602
$ 421,643

$ 670,057
37,832
1,130
$ 709,019

$ 959,635
152,295
18,732
$ 1,130,662

Originations,  Purchases  and  Sales  of  Loans  –  The  lending  activities  of  First  Federal are 
subject  to  the  written,  non-discriminatory,  underwriting  standards  and  loan  origination  procedures 
established by the Board of Directors and management. Loan originations are obtained from a variety of 
sources,  including  referrals  from  existing  customers,  real  estate  brokers,  developers  and  builders, 
newspaper and radio advertising and walk-in customers.

First Federal’s loan approval process for all types of loans is intended to assess the borrower’s 
ability to repay the loan, the viability of the loan and the adequacy of the value of the collateral that will 
secure the loan.

A commercial loan application is first reviewed and underwritten by one of the commercial loan 
officers, who may approve credits within their lending limit. Another loan officer with limits sufficient to 
cover  the  exposure  must  approve  credits  exceeding  an  individual’s  lending  limit.  All  credits  which 
exceed  $100,000  in  aggregate  exposure  must  be  presented  for  review  or  approval  to  the  Senior  Loan 
Committee  comprised  of  senior  lending  personnel.  Credits  which  exceed  $2,000,000  in  aggregate 
exposure must be presented for approval to the Executive Loan Committee. 

Residential mortgage applications are accepted by retail lenders or branch managers, who utilize 
an  automated  underwriting  system  to  review  the  loan  request.  First  Federal  also  receives  mortgage 
applications  via  an  online  residential  mortgage  origination  system.  A  final  approval  of  all  residential 
mortgage  applications  is  made  by  a member of a centralized underwriting staff within their designated 
lending limits. Loan requests in excess or outside an individual underwriter’s limit are approved by the 
Senior Loan Committee and, if necessary, by the Executive Loan Committee. 

Retail lenders and branch managers are authorized to originate and approve direct consumer loan 
requests that are within policy guidelines and within the lender’s approved lending limit. Loans in excess 
of the lender’s approved lending limit may be approved by retail lending managers up to their approved 
lending  limit.  Loans  in  excess  of  the  retail  lending  manager’s  authorized  lending  limit  or  outside  of 
policy  must  be  approved  by  the  Senior  Loan  Committee  and, if  necessary, by  the  Executive  Loan 
Committee.  Indirect  consumer  loans  originated  by  auto  dealers  are  underwritten  and  approved  by  a 
designated underwriter in accordance with Company policy and lending limits. 

First Defiance offers adjustable-rate loans in order to decrease the vulnerability of its operations 
to changes in interest rates. The demand for adjustable-rate loans in First Defiance’s primary market area 
has  been  a  function  of  several  factors,  including  customer  preference,  the  level  of  interest  rates,  the 
expectations of changes in the level of interest rates and the difference between the interest rates offered 
for  fixed-rate  loans  and  adjustable-rate  loans.  The  relative  amount  of  fixed-rate  and  adjustable-rate 
residential  loans  that  can  be  originated  at  any  time  is  largely  determined  by  the  demand  for  each  in  a 
competitive environment. 

- 10 - 

- 10 -

Adjustable-rate  loans  represented  10.8%  of  First  Defiance’s  total  originations  of  one-to-four 
family  residential  mortgage  loans  in  2016 compared  to  10.3%  and  11.9% during  2015 and  2014,
respectively.

Adjustable-rate  loans  decrease  the  risks  associated  with  changes  in  interest  rates,  but  involve 
other  risks,  primarily  because  as  interest  rates  rise,  the  payment  by  the  borrower  rises  to  the  extent 
permitted  by  the  terms  of  the  loan,  thereby  increasing  the  potential  for  default.  At  the  same  time,  the 
marketability of the underlying property may be adversely affected by higher interest rates.

The  following  table  shows  total  loans  originated,  loan  reductions,  and  the  net  increase in First 

Defiance’s total loans and loans held for sale during the periods indicated: 

2016

Years Ended December 31
2015
(In Thousands)

2014

Loan originations:

1-4 family residential
Multi-family residential 
Commercial real estate 
Construction
Commercial
Home equity and improvement
Consumer finance
Total loans originated
Loans purchased:
Loan reductions:
Loan pay-offs
Loans sold
Periodic principal repayments

$

294,307 $
59,957
166,437
138,553
389,037
56,816
10,426
1,115,533
822

241,658
44,352
241,969
116,224
465,543
54,676
10,235
1,174,657
-

232,302
282,589
432,445
947,336
169,019 $

265,311
231,067
493,383
989,761
184,896

$

$

173,301
46,181
159,959
66,264
524,073
45,934
10,632
1,026,344
16,594

219,446
176,381
578,873
974,700
68,238

Net increase in total loans and loans held for sale

$

Asset Quality

First  Defiance’s  credit  policy  establishes  guidelines  to  manage  credit  risk  and  asset  quality. 
These  guidelines  include  loan  review  and  early  identification  of  problem  loans  to  ensure  sound  credit 
decisions.  First  Defiance’s  credit  policies  and  review  procedures  are  meant  to  minimize  the  risk  and 
uncertainties  inherent  in  lending.  In  following  the  policies  and  procedures,  management  must  rely  on 
estimates,  appraisals  and  evaluations  of  loans  and  the  possibility  that  changes  in  these  could  occur 
because of changing economic conditions. 

Delinquent Loans — The following table sets forth information concerning delinquent loans at 
December  31,  2016,  in  dollar  amount  and  as  a  percentage  of  First  Defiance’s  total  loan portfolio. The 
amounts presented represent the total outstanding principal balances of the related loans, rather than the 
actual payment amounts that are past due.

- 11 - 

- 11 -

30 to 59 Days

60 to 89 Days

90 Days and Over

Total

Amount Percentage Amount Percentage Amount Percentage Amount Percentage
(Dollars in Thousands)

1-4 family residential real 

estate

Multi- family residential
Commercial real estate
Construction
Commercial
Home Equity and 
Improvement
Consumer Finance
Total

$

$

221
-
159
-
23

1,115
85
1,603

0.01%
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00

0.05
0.01
0.08%

$ 1,142
-
16
-
10

174
69
$ 1,411

0.06% $
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

608
-
2,072
-
403

254
0.01
0.00
78
0.07% $ 3,415

0.03%
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.02

0.02
0.00
0.17%

$ 1,971
-
2,247
-
436

1,543
232
$ 6,429

0.10%
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.02

0.08
0.01
0.32%

Overall, the level of delinquencies at December 31, 2016 decreased from the levels at December 
31,  2015,  when  First  Defiance  reported  that  0.64%  of  its  outstanding  loans  were  at  least  30  days 
delinquent. The level of total loans 90 or more days delinquent has decreased to 0.17% at December 31, 
2016 from  0.39%  at  December  31,  2015. The  level  of  total  loans  60-89  days  delinquent  decreased  to 
0.07% at December 31, 2016 from 0.13% at December 31, 2015. The level of loans that were 30 to 59 
days  past  due  decreased  to  0.08%  at  December  31,  2016  from  0.12%  at December  31,  2015.
Management has assessed the collectability of all loans that are 90 days or more delinquent as part of its 
procedures in establishing the allowance for loan losses.

Nonperforming  Assets  –  All  loans are  reviewed  on  a  regular  basis  and  are  placed  on  non-
accrual  status  when,  in  the  opinion  of  management,  the  collectability  of  additional  interest  is  not 
expected.  Generally,  First  Defiance  places  all  loans  more  than  90  days  past  due on non-accrual status. 
First  Defiance also  places  loans  on  non-accrual  when the  loan  is  paying  as  agreed  but  the  Company 
believes the financial condition of the borrower is such that this classification is warranted. When a loan 
is placed on non-accrual status, total unpaid interest accrued to date is reversed. Subsequent payments are 
generally applied to the outstanding principal balance but may be recorded as interest income, depending 
on  the  assessment  of  the  ultimate  collectability  of  the  loan.  First  Defiance  considers  that  a  loan  is 
impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that it will be unable to collect all 
amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. First 
Defiance measures impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the 
loan’s  effective  interest  rate,  the  loan’s  observable  market  price,  or  the  fair  value  of  the  collateral,  if 
collateral  dependent.  If  the  estimated  recoverability  of  the  impaired  loan  is  less  than  the  recorded 
investment,  First  Defiance  will  recognize  impairment by allocating a portion of the allowance for loan 
losses on cash flow dependent loans and by charging off the deficiency on collateral dependent loans.  

Loans originated by First Federal having principal balances of $27.4 million, $41.9 million and 
$48.9 million  were  considered  impaired  as  of  December 31,  2016,  2015 and  2014, respectively.  The 
decrease in impaired loans from 2014 to 2016 is due to a continued concerted effort by management and 
the lending staff to work specific credits out of the Bank or back to performing status.  These amounts of 
impaired loans exclude large groups of small-balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated 
for impairment such as residential mortgage, consumer installment and credit card loans, except for those 
classified  as troubled  debt  restructurings.  There  was  $1.7 million of  interest  received  and  recorded  in 
income during 2016 related to impaired loans. There was $1.3 million and $1.6 million recorded in 2015
and  2014, respectively.  Unrecorded  interest  income  based  on  the  loan’s  contractual  terms  on  these 
impaired loans and all non-performing loans in 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $1.2 million, $1.5 million, and 
$1.2 million,  respectively. The  average recorded  investment  in  impaired  loans  during  2016,  2015  and 
2014 (excluding loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310 Subtopic 30) was $32.8 million, $51.8
million  and  $50.3 million,  respectively.  The  total  allowance  for  loan  losses  related  to  these  loans  was 
$0.8 million, $0.4 million, and $1.3 million at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

- 12 - 

- 12 -

Real estate acquired by foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until such time as it is sold. 
First  Defiance  also  repossesses  other  assets  securing  loans,  consisting  primarily  of  automobiles.  When 
such property is acquired it is recorded at fair value less cost to sell. Costs relating to development and 
improvement  of  property  are  capitalized,  whereas  costs  relating  to  holding  the  property  are  expensed. 
Valuations are periodically performed by management and a write-down of the value is recorded with a 
corresponding  charge  to  operations  if  it  is  determined  that  the  carrying  value  of  property  exceeds  its 
estimated  net  realizable  value. During  2016,  First  Defiance  recognized  $74,000 of  expense  related  to 
write-downs  in  value  of  real  estate  acquired  by  foreclosure.  The  balance  of  real  estate  owned  at 
December 31, 2016 was $455,000.

As of December 31, 2016, First Defiance’s total non-performing loans amounted to $14.3 million 
or 0.74% of total loans (net of undisbursed loan funds and deferred fees and costs), compared to $16.3
million or 0.90% of total loans, at December 31, 2015.  Non-performing loans are loans which are more 
than 90 days past due or on nonaccrual. The nonperforming loan balance for 2016 includes $11.3 million 
of loans that were originated by First Federal and also considered impaired compared to $13.4 million for 
2015.

The  following  table  sets  forth  the  amounts  and  categories  of  First  Defiance’s  non-performing 
assets (excluding impaired loans not considered non-performing) and troubled debt restructurings at the 
dates indicated.

Nonperforming loans:

2016

2015

December 31
2014
(Dollars in Thousands)

2013

2012

1-4 family residential real estate
Multi-family residential real estate
Commercial real estate
Commercial 
Home Equity and Improvement
Consumer finance
Total nonperforming loans

$ 2,928
2,639
6,953
1,007
730
91
14,348

$ 2,610
2,419
7,429
3,078
689
36
16,261

$ 3,332
2,539
12,635
4,993
619
12
24,130

$ 3,273
581
15,253
8,327
413
-
27,847

$ 3,602
1,177
21,913
5,661
217
-
32,570

Real estate owned
Total repossessed assets

455
455

1,321
1,321

6,181
6,181

5,859
5,859

3,805
3,805

Total nonperforming assets

$ 14,803

$ 17,582

$ 30,311

$ 33,706

$ 36,375

Restructured loans, accruing

$ 10,544

$ 11,178

$ 24,686

$ 27,630

$ 28,203

Total nonperforming assets as a
percentage of total assets 
Total nonperforming loans as a 
percentage of total loans*
Total nonperforming assets as a 

percentage of total loans plus REO*
Allowance for loan losses as a percent

0.60%

0.77%

1.39%

1.58%

1.78%

0.74%

0.90%

1.47%

1.76%

2.14%

0.76%

0.97%

1.83%

2.12%

2.38%

of total nonperforming assets

174.86% 144.36% 81.71%

74.02%

73.43%

* Total loans are net of undisbursed loan funds and deferred fees and costs. 

Allowance for Loan Losses – First Defiance maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb 
probable  incurred  credit  losses  in  the  loan  portfolio.  The  allowance  for  loan  loss  is  made  up  of  two 
components.    The  first  is  a  general  reserve,  which  is  used  to  record  loan  loss  reserves  for  groups  of 

- 13 - 

- 13 -

homogenous  loans  in  which  the  Company  estimates  the  losses  incurred  in  the  portfolio  based  on 
quantitative and qualitative factors.  

The  second  component  of  the  allowance  for  loan  loss  is  the  specific  reserve  in  which  the 
Company sets aside reserves based on the analysis of individual credits.  In evaluating the adequacy of its 
allowance  each  quarter,  management  grades  all  loans  in  the  commercial  portfolio.  See  Management’s 
Discussion  and  Analysis  – Allowance  for  Loan  Losses  for  further  discussion  on  management’s 
evaluation of the allowance for loan losses.

Loans are charged against the allowance when such loans meet the Company’s established policy 
on loan charge-offs and the allowance itself is adjusted quarterly by recording a provision for loan losses. 
As such, actual losses and losses provided for should be approximately the same if the overall quality, 
composition and size of the portfolio remained static along with a static loan environment. To the extent 
that  the  portfolio  grows  at  a  rapid  rate  or  overall  quality  or  the  loan  environment  deteriorates,  the 
provision  generally  will  exceed  charge-offs.  However,  in  certain  circumstances  net  charge-offs may 
exceed the provision for loan losses when management determines that loans previously provided for in 
the allowance for loan losses are uncollectible and should be charged off or as overall credit or the loan 
environment improves. Although management believes that it uses the best information available to make 
such determinations, future adjustments to the allowances may be necessary, and net earnings could be 
significantly  affected,  if  circumstances  differ  substantially  from  the  assumptions  used  in  making  the 
initial determinations.

At  December  31,  2016,  First  Defiance’s  allowance  for  loan  losses  totaled  $25.9  million 
compared  to  $25.4 million  at  December  31,  2015.  The  following  table  sets  forth  the  activity  in  First 
Defiance’s allowance for loan losses during the periods indicated.

2016

Years Ended December 31
2013
2014
2015
(Dollars in Thousands)

2012

Allowance at beginning of year
Provision for credit losses
Charge-offs:
1-4 family residential real estate
Commercial real estate and multi-family
Commercial
Consumer finance
Home equity and improvement

Total charge-offs
Recoveries 
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
Ending allowance

$ 25,382
283

$ 24,766
136

$ 24,950
1,117

$ 26,711
1,824

$ 33,254
10,924

(350)
(92)
(615)
(94)
(268)
(1,419)
1,638
219
$ 25,884

(282)
(468)
(68)
(53)
(350)
(1,221)
1,701
480
$ 25,382

(426)
(1,018)
(2,982)
(41)
(392)
(4,859)
3,558
(1,301)
$ 24,766

(643)
(2,475)
(1,230)
(94)
(757)
(5,199)
1,614
(3,585)
$ 24,950

(2,515)
(11,319)
(4,047)
(133)
(1,165)
(19,179)
1,712
(17,467)
$ 26,711

Allowance for loan losses to total non-

performing loans at end of year

Allowance for loan losses to total loans at end 

of year*

Net charge-offs (recoveries) for the year to 

180.40% 156.09% 102.64%

89.60%

82.01%

1.33%

1.41%

1.50%

1.58%

1.75%

average loans

0.08%
* Total loans are net of undisbursed loan funds and deferred fees and costs.  

-0.01% -0.03%

0.23%

1.18%

The provision for credit losses decreased significantly in 2016 and 2015 from previous years due 
to improved credit quality of the loan portfolio.  Management does not anticipate a net recovery position 
in  2017  and  feels  that  the  level  of  the  allowance  for  loan  losses  at  December  31,  2016 is  sufficient to 
cover the estimated losses incurred but not yet recognized in the loan portfolio. 

- 14 - 

- 14 -

The  following  table sets  forth  information  concerning  the  allocation  of  First  Defiance’s 
allowance for loan losses by loan categories at the dates indicated. For information about the percent of 
total loans in each category to total loans, see “Lending Activities-Loan Portfolio Composition.” 

2016

2015

December 31
2014

2013

2012

Percent of
total loans
by category Amount

Percent of
total loans
by category Amount

Percent of
total loans
by category Amount

Percent of
total loans
by category Amount

Percent of
total loans
by category

Amount

1-4 family residential $ 2,627
Multi-family  

10.2% $ 3,212

11.0%

(Dollars in Thousands)
12.2%

$ 2,494

$ 2,847

12.2%

$ 3,506

13.0%

residential real 
estate 

Commercial real 

estate
Construction
Commercial loans 
Home equity and 
improvement 
loans

Consumer loans

2,228

10,625
450
7,361

9.7

41.5
9.0
23.0

2,151

11,772
517
5,192

9.0

41.8
8.7
22.4

2,453

11,268
221
6,509

9.3

40.6
6.7
23.7

2,508

12,000
134
5,678

9.2

41.6
5.3
24.1

2,197

12,702
75
6,325

7.9

43.7
2.5
24.9

2,386
207
$25,884

5.8
0.8

2,270
171
100.0% $25,382

6.2
0.9
100.0%

1,704
117
$24,766

6.6
0.9
100.0%

1,635
148
$24,950

6.6
1.0
100.0%

1,759
147
$26,711

7.0
1.0
100.0%

Sources of Funds

General  –  Deposits  are  the  primary  source  of  First  Defiance’s  funds  for  lending  and  other 
investment  purposes.  In  addition  to  deposits,  First  Defiance  derives  funds  from  loan  principal 
repayments. Loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows 
are significantly influenced by general interest rates and money market conditions. Borrowings from the 
FHLB may be used on a short-term basis to compensate for reductions in the availability of funds from 
other sources. They may also be used on a longer-term basis for general business purposes. During 2007,
First Defiance issued $15.0 million of trust preferred securities through an unconsolidated affiliated trust. 
Proceeds from the offering were used for general corporate purposes including funding of dividends and 
stock  buybacks  as  well  as  bolstering  regulatory  capital  at  the  First  Federal  level. First  Defiance  also 
issued $20.0 million of similar trust preferred securities in 2005.

Deposits  – First  Defiance’s  deposits  are  attracted  principally  from  within  First  Defiance’s 
primary market area through the offering of a broad selection of deposit instruments, including checking 
accounts, money market accounts, savings accounts, and term certificate accounts. Deposit account terms 
vary, with the principal differences being the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must 
remain on deposit, and the interest rate. 

To supplement its funding needs, First Defiance also has the ability to utilize the national market 
for Certificates of Deposit. First Defiance has used these deposits in the past and could in the future if 
necessary.  The total balance of national certificates of deposit was $0 at December 31, 2016 and 2015. 

Average balances and average rates paid on deposits are as follows:

2016

Amount

Rate

Years Ended December 31
2015

Amount
(Dollars in Thousands)

Rate

2014

Amount

Rate

$

441,731

-

$

388,257

-

$

350,677

-

798,266
235,137
430,487
$ 1,905,621

742,856
0.17%
215,253
0.04
441,510
1.12
0.33% $ 1,787,876

733,637
0.16%
198,919
0.04
0.92
466,951
0.30% $ 1,750,184

0.17%
0.05
0.85
0.30%

Non-interest-bearing 
demand deposits

Interest bearing 

demand deposits

Savings deposits
Time deposits
Totals

- 15 - 

- 15 -

The  following  table  sets  forth  the  maturities  of  First  Defiance’s  retail  certificates  of  deposit 

having principal amounts $100,000 or greater at December 31, 2016 (In Thousands):  

Retail certificates of deposit maturing in quarter ending:

March 31, 2017
June 30, 2017
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2017
After December 31, 2017

Total retail certificates of deposit with 

balances $100,000 or greater

$

17,854
16,394
15,125
8,322
109,862

$ 167,557

The following table details the deposit accrued interest payable as of December 31:

Interest bearing demand deposits and 

money market accounts

Certificates of deposit

2016

2015

(In Thousands)

$

$

23
19
42

$

$

18
25
43

For additional information regarding First Defiance’s deposits see Note 11 to the Consolidated 

Financial Statements.

Borrowings— First Defiance  may  obtain  advances  from  the  FHLB  of  Cincinnati  by  pledging
certain  of  its  residential  mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, multi-family loans, home equity 
loans  and  investment  securities  provided  certain  standards  related  to  creditworthiness  have  been  met. 
Such advances are made pursuant to several credit programs, each of which has its own interest rate and 
range of maturities.

The  following  table  sets  forth  certain  information  as  to  First  Defiance’s  FHLB  advances  and 

other borrowings at the dates indicated.  

Long-term:

FHLB advances

Weighted average interest rate

Short-term:

Securities sold under  agreement to repurchase

Weighted average interest rate

2016

Years Ended December 31
2015
(Dollars in Thousands)

2014

103,943
1.42%

$    59,902
1.62%

$    21,544
2.38%

31,816
0.22%

$    57,188
0.27%

$    54,759
0.28%

$

$

- 16 - 

- 16 -

The  following  table  sets  forth  the  maximum  month-end  balance  and  average  balance  of  First 

Defiance’s long-term FHLB advances and other borrowings during the periods indicated.  

Long-term:

FHLB advances:

Maximum balance
Average balance
Weighted average interest rate

2016

Years Ended December 31
2015
(Dollars in Thousands)

2014

$ 103,943
84,944
1.42%

$

59,902
38,185
1.62%

$

22,520
21,993
2.38%

The  following  table  sets  forth  the  maximum  month-end  balance  and  average  balance  of  First 

Defiance’s short-term FHLB advances and other borrowings during the periods indicated.  

Short-term:

FHLB advances:

Maximum balance
Average balance
Weighted average interest rate

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase:

Maximum balance
Average balance 
Weighted average interest rate 

2016

Years Ended December 31
2015
(Dollars in Thousands)

2014

$

$

30,000
861
0.39%

57,984
52,821
0.26%

$

$

-
41
0.18%

60,272
54,632
0.28%

$

$

-
-

-

61,154
54,541
0.29%

First  Defiance  borrows  funds  under  a  variety  of  programs  at  the  FHLB.  As  of  December 31, 
2016,  there  was  $103.9  million  outstanding  under  various  long-term  FHLB  advance  programs.  First 
Defiance  utilizes  short-term  advances  from  the  FHLB  to  meet  cash  flow  needs  and  for  short-term 
investment  purposes.  At  December  31,  2016 and  2015,  no  outstanding  balances  existed  under  First 
Defiance’s  short-term  Cash  Management  Advance  Line  of  Credit  or  REPO  line  of  credit.    The  total 
available under the Cash Management Advance Line is $15.0 million. Additionally, First Defiance has 
$100.0 million available under a REPO line of credit. Amounts are generally borrowed under these lines 
on  an  overnight  basis.  First  Federal’s  total  borrowing  capacity  at  the  FHLB  is  limited  by  various 
collateral  requirements.  Eligible  collateral  includes  mortgage  loans,  home  equity  loans,  non-mortgage 
loans, cash, and investment securities. At December 31, 2016, other than amounts available on the REPO 
and  Cash  Management  line,  First  Federal  had  additional  borrowing  capacity  with  the  FHLB  of $448.9 
million as a result of these collateral requirements.

As a member of the FHLB of Cincinnati, First Federal must maintain a minimum investment in 
the capital stock of that FHLB in an amount defined in the FHLB’s regulations. First Federal is permitted 
to  own  stock  in  excess  of  the  minimum  requirement  and  was  in  compliance  with  the  minimum 
requirement  with  an  investment  in  stock  of  the  FHLB  of  Cincinnati  of  $13.8 million  at  December 31, 
2016 and 2015.  First Federal holds stock of the FHLB of Indianapolis of $5,000 at December 31, 2016
and $9,000 at December 31, 2015.   

Each  FHLB  is  required  to  establish  standards  of  community  investment  or  service  that  its 
members must maintain for continued access to long-term advances from the FHLB. The standards take 
into account a member’s performance under the Community Reinvestment Act and its record of lending 
to first-time homebuyers. 

For additional information regarding First Defiance’s FHLB advances and other debt see Notes 

12 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 17 - 

- 17 -

Subordinated  Debentures  - In  March  2007,  the  Company  sponsored  an  affiliated  trust,  First 
Defiance  Statutory  Trust  II  (“Trust  Affiliate  II”)  that issued $15.0 million of Guaranteed Capital Trust 
Securities (“Trust Preferred Securities”). In connection with the transaction, the Company issued $15.5
million  of  Junior  Subordinated  Deferrable  Interest  Debentures  (“Subordinated  Debentures”)  to  Trust 
Affiliate II. Trust Affiliate II was formed for the purpose of issuing Trust Preferred Securities to third-
party investors and investing the proceeds from the sale of these capital securities solely in Subordinated 
Debentures of the Company. The Subordinated Debentures held by Trust Affiliate II are the sole assets of 
the trust. Distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate II are payable quarterly 
at a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 1.5%.  The Coupon rate payable on the Trust 
Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate II was 2.46% and 2.01% as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 
respectively.

The  Trust  Preferred  Securities are  subject  to  mandatory  redemption,  in  whole  or  in  part,  upon 
repayment  of  the  Subordinated  Debentures.  The  Company  entered  into  an  agreement  that  fully  and 
unconditionally guarantees the Trust Preferred Securities subject to the terms of the guarantee. The Trust 
Preferred Securities and Subordinated Debentures mature on June 15, 2037, but can be redeemed at the 
Company’s option at any time now.  

In October 2005, the Company formed an affiliated trust, First Defiance Statutory Trust I (“Trust 
Affiliate I”)  that  issued $20.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities. In connection with the transaction, 
the Company issued $20.6 million of Subordinated Debentures to Trust Affiliate I. Trust Affiliate I was 
formed  for  the  purpose  of  issuing  Trust  Preferred  Securities  to  third-party  investors  and  investing  the 
proceeds from the sale of these capital securities solely in Subordinated Debentures of the Company. The 
Subordinated  Debentures  held  by  Trust  Affiliate  I  are  the  sole  assets  of  the  trust.  Distributions  on  the 
Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate I are payable quarterly at a variable rate equal to the 
three-month  LIBOR  rate  plus  1.38%,  or  2.34%  and  1.89%  as  of  December  31,  2016 and  2015
respectively.

The Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate I are subject to mandatory redemption, in 
whole  or  in  part,  upon  repayment  of  the  Subordinated  Debentures.  The  Company  entered  into  an 
agreement that fully and unconditionally guarantees the Trust Preferred Securities subject to the terms of 
the  guarantee.  The  Trust  Preferred  Securities  and  Subordinated  Debentures  mature  on  December  15, 
2035, but can be redeemed by the Company at any time now.  

Employees

First  Defiance  had  581 employees  at  December 31,  2016.  None  of  these  employees  are 
represented  by  a  collective  bargaining  agent,  and  First  Defiance  believes  that  it  maintains  good 
relationships with its personnel. 

Competition

Competition  in  originating commercial  real  estate and  commercial  loans  comes  mainly  from 
commercial  banks  with  banking  center  offices  in  the  Company’s  market  area.  Competition  for  the 
origination of mortgage loans arises mainly from savings associations, commercial banks, and mortgage 
companies. The distinction among market participants is based on a combination of price, the quality of 
customer  service  and  name  recognition.  The  Company  competes  for  loans  by  offering  competitive 
interest rates and product types and by seeking to provide a higher level of personal service to borrowers 
than is furnished by competitors. First Federal has a significant market share of the lending markets in 
which it conducts operations, except for central Ohio. 

Management believes that First Federal’s most direct competition for deposits comes from local 
financial  institutions.  The  distinction  among  market  participants  is  based  on  price  and  the  quality  of 
customer  service  and  name  recognition.  First  Federal’s  cost  of  funds  fluctuates  with  general  market 
interest  rates.  During  certain  interest  rate  environments,  additional  significant  competition  for  deposits 

- 18 - 

- 18 -

may be expected from corporate and governmental debt securities, as well as from money market mutual 
funds.  First  Federal  competes  for  conventional  deposits  by  emphasizing  quality  of  service,  extensive 
product lines and competitive pricing. 

Regulation 

General – First Defiance and First Federal are subject to regulation, examination and oversight 
by  the  Office  of  the  Comptroller  of  the  Currency  (“OCC”)  and  the  Federal  Reserve  Board  (“Federal 
Reserve”). Because the FDIC insures First Federal’s deposits, First Federal is also subject to examination 
and  regulation  by  the  FDIC.  In  addition,  First  Federal  is  subject  to  regulation  and  examination  by  the 
Consumer  Financial  Protection  Bureau  (the  “CFPB”)  established  by  the  2010  Dodd-Frank  Wall  Street 
Reform  and  Consumer  Protection  Act  (“Dodd-Frank  Act”).    First  Defiance  and  First  Federal  must  file 
periodic reports with the Federal Reserve and the OCC and examinations are conducted periodically by 
the  Federal  Reserve,  OCC and  the  FDIC  to  determine  whether First  Defiance  and First  Federal  are  in 
compliance  with  various  regulatory  requirements  and  are operating  in  a  safe  and  sound  manner.  First 
Federal is subject to various consumer protection and fair lending laws. These laws govern, among other 
things, truth-in-lending disclosure, equal credit opportunity, and, in the case of First Federal, fair credit 
reporting  and  community  reinvestment.  Failure  to  abide  by  federal laws  and  regulations  governing 
community  reinvestment  could  limit  the  ability  of  First  Federal  to  open  a  new  branch  or  engage  in  a 
merger  transaction.  Community  reinvestment  regulations  evaluate  how  well  and  to  what  extent  First 
Federal  lends  and  invests  in  its  designated  service  area,  with  particular  emphasis  on  low-to-moderate 
income communities and borrowers in such areas.

First Defiance is also subject to various Ohio laws which restrict takeover bids, tender offers and 

control-share acquisitions involving public companies which have significant ties to Ohio. 

Regulatory  Capital  Requirements  – The  federal  banking  regulators  have  adopted  risk-based 
capital guidelines for financial institutions and their holding companies, designed to absorb losses. The 
guidelines  provide  a  systematic  analytical  framework,  which  makes  regulatory  capital  requirements 
sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banking organizations, takes off-balance sheet exposures 
expressly into account in evaluating capital adequacy and minimizes disincentives to holding liquid, low-
risk assets. Capital levels as measured by these standards are also used to categorize financial institutions 
for purposes of certain prompt corrective action regulatory provisions. 

 In  July  2013the  United  States  banking  regulators  issued  final  new  capital  rules  applicable  to 
smaller banking organizations which also implement certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.  The new 
minimum capital requirements became effective on January 1, 2015, whereas a new capital conservation 
buffer  and  deductions  from  common  equity  capital  phase  in  from  January  1,  2016,  through  January  1, 
2019, and most deductions from common equity tier 1 capital are being phased in from January 1, 2015, 
through January 1, 2019.    

The new rules include (a) a new common equity tier 1 (“CET1”) capital ratio of at least 4.5%, (b) 
a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6.0%, rather than the former 4.0%, (c) a minimum total capital ratio that 
remains at 8.0%, and (d) a minimum leverage ratio of 4%. 

Common equity for the common equity tier 1 capital ratio includes common stock (plus related 
surplus) and retained earnings, plus limited amounts of minority interests in the form of common stock, 
less the majority of certain regulatory deductions.    

Tier 1 capital includes common equity as defined for the common equity tier 1 capital ratio, plus 
certain  non-cumulative  preferred  stock  and  related  surplus,  cumulative  preferred  stock  and  related 
surplus  and  trust  preferred  securities  that  have  been  grandfathered  (but  which  are  not  permitted  going 
forward), and limited amounts of minority interests in the form of additional Tier 1 capital instruments, 
less certain deductions.

- 19 - 

- 19 -

 
Tier  2  capital,  which  can  be  included  in  the  total  capital  ratio,  includes  certain  capital 
instruments (such as subordinated debt) and limited amounts of the allowance for loan and lease losses, 
subject to new eligibility criteria, less applicable deductions.

The deductions from common equity tier 1 capital include goodwill and other intangibles, certain 
deferred  tax  assets,  mortgage-servicing  assets  above  certain  levels,  gains  on  sale  in  connection  with  a 
securitization,  investments  in  a  banking  organization’s  own  capital  instruments  and  investments  in  the 
capital of unconsolidated financial institutions (above certain levels).  The deductions phase in through 
2019.

Under  the  guidelines,  capital  is  compared  to  the  relative  risk  related  to  the  balance  sheet.    To 
derive the risk included in the balance sheet, one of several risk weights is applied to different balance 
sheet  and  off-balance  sheet  assets,  primarily  based  on  the  relative  credit  risk of the counterparty.  The 
capital  amounts  and  classification  are  also  subject  to  qualitative  judgments  by  the  regulators  about 
components, risk weightings and other factors.   

The new rules also place restrictions on the payment of capital distributions, including dividends, 
and  certain  discretionary  bonus  payments  to  executive  officers  if  the  company  does  not  hold  a  capital 
conservation buffer of greater than 2.5% composed of common equity tier 1 capital above its minimum 
risk-based capital requirements, or if its eligible retained income is negative in that quarter and its capital 
conservation  buffer  ratio  was  less than 2.5% at the beginning of the quarter.  The capital conservation 
buffer phases in starting on January 1, 2016, at .625%.   

The  following  table  sets  forth  the  amount  and  percentage  level  of  regulatory  capital  of  First 
Federal at December 31, 2016, and the amount by which it exceeded the minimum capital requirements
in effect at that date. (Dollars in Thousands): 

Actual

Minimum Required for 
Adequately Capitalized

Minimum Required for Well 
Capitalized

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio(1)

Amount

Ratio

CET1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) (1)

Consolidated

First Federal 

Tier 1 Capital (2)

Consolidated

First Federal 

$234,809

$242,928

10.45%

10.81%

$101,108

$101,116

$269,809

$242,928

11.24%

10.14%

$95,975

$95,791

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)

Consolidated

First Federal 

$269,809

$242,928

12.01%

10.81%

$134,811

$134,822

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)

Consolidated

First Federal 

$295,693

$268,812

13.16%

11.96%

$179,748

$179,763

4.5%

4.5%

4.0%

4.0%

6.0%

6.0%

8.0%

8.0%

N/A

$146,057

N/A

$119,739

N/A

$179,763

N/A

6.5%

N/A

5.0%

N/A

8.0%

N/A

$224,703

N/A

10.0%

(1) Excludes capital conservation buffer of 0.625% as of December 31, 2016.
(2) Core capital is computed as a percentage of adjusted total assets of $2.40 billion for consolidated and $2.39 
billion  for the  Bank.  Risk-based  capital  is  computed  as  a  percentage  of  total  risk-weighted  assets  of  $2.25
billion for consolidated and the Bank. 

Prompt Corrective Action - The federal banking agencies have established a system of “prompt 
corrective  action”  to  resolve  certain  problems  of  undercapitalized  institutions.  This  system  is based on 
five  capital  level  categories  for  insured  depository  institutions:  "well  capitalized,"  "adequately 
capitalized,"  "undercapitalized,"  "significantly  undercapitalized"  and  "critically  undercapitalized."    The 

- 20 - 

- 20 -

federal banking agencies may (or in some cases must) take certain supervisory actions depending upon a 
bank's capital level. For example, the banking agencies must appoint a receiver or conservator for a bank 
within  90  days  after  it  becomes  "critically  undercapitalized"  unless  the  bank's  primary  regulator 
determines,  with  the  concurrence  of  the  FDIC,  that  other  action  would  better  achieve  regulatory 
purposes.    Banking  operations  otherwise  may  be  significantly  affected  depending  on  a  bank's  capital 
category.    For  example,  a  bank  that  is  not  "well  capitalized"  generally  is  prohibited  from  accepting 
brokered deposits and offering interest rates on deposits higher than the prevailing rate in its market, and 
the  holding  company  of  any  undercapitalized  depository  institution  must  guarantee,  in  part,  specific 
aspects of the bank's capital plan for the plan to be acceptable.

Effective  January  1,  2015,  in  order to be "well-capitalized," a financial institution must have a 
common equity tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5%, a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%, a Tier 1 risk-
based capital of at least 8% and a leverage ratio of at least 5%, and the institution must not be subject to 
any written agreement, order, capital directive or prompt corrective action directive to meet and maintain 
a  specific  capital  level  for  any  capital  measure.   As of December 31, 2016, First Federal met the ratio 
requirements  in  effect  at  that  date  to  be  deemed  "well-capitalized."  See  Note  17  of  the  Notes  to 
Consolidated Financial Statements which is incorporated herein by reference.  

Dividends -  Dividends paid by First Federal to First Defiance are subject to various regulatory 
restrictions. First Federal paid $22.0 million in dividends to First Defiance in 2016 and $29.0 million in 
2015. First Federal can initiate dividend payments equal to its net profits (as defined by statute) for the 
last two fiscal years, plus any year to date net profits.  First Insurance paid $1.2 million in dividends to 
First Defiance in 2016 and $900,000 in dividends in 2015.  First Defiance Risk Management paid $1.0 
million in dividends to First Defiance in 2016 and 2015.  

First Defiance’s ability to pay dividends to its shareholders is primarily dependent on its receipt 
of dividends from the Subsidiaries.  The Federal Reserve expects First Defiance to serve as a source of 
strength for First Federal and may require First Defiance to retain capital for further investment in First 
Federal, rather than pay dividends to First Defiance shareholders. Payment of dividends by First Federal 
may be restricted at any time at the discretion of its applicable regulatory authorities if they deem such 
dividends to constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice.  These provisions could have the effect of 
limiting First Defiance's ability to pay dividends on its common shares.

Transactions with Insiders and Affiliates - Loans to executive officers, directors and principal 
shareholders  and  their  related  interests  must  conform  to  the  lending  limits.  Most  loans  to  directors, 
executive  officers  and  principal  shareholders  must  be  approved  in  advance  by  a  majority  of  the 
“disinterested”  members  of  board  of  directors  of  the  association  with  any  “interested”  director  not 
participating. All loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders must be made on terms 
substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions with the general public or as offered to all 
employees  in  a  company-wide  benefit  program.  Loans to  executive  officers  are  subject  to  additional 
restrictions.  In  addition,  all  related  party  transactions  must  be  approved  by  the  Company’s  audit 
committee  pursuant  to  NASDAQ Rule  5630,  including  loans  made  by  financial  institutions  in  the 
ordinary  course of  business.  All  transactions  between  savings  associations  and  their  affiliates  must 
comply with  Sections  23A  and  23B  of  the  Federal  Reserve  Act  (“FRA”)  and  the  Federal  Reserve’s
Regulation W. An affiliate of a savings association is any company or entity that controls, is controlled 
by,  or  is  under  common  control  with  the  savings  association.  First  Defiance,  First  Defiance  Risk 
Management and First Insurance are affiliates of First Federal.

Holding  Company  Regulation  -  First  Defiance  is  a  unitary  thrift  holding  company  and  is 
subject to the Federal Reserve regulations, examination, supervision and reporting requirements. Federal 
law generally prohibits a thrift holding company from controlling any other savings association or thrift 
holding  company,  without  prior  approval  of  the  Federal  Reserve,  or  from  acquiring  or  retaining  more 
than  5%  of  the  voting  shares  of  a  savings  association  or  holding  company  thereof,  which  is  not  a 
subsidiary.  

- 21 - 

- 21 -

Deposit Insurance - Substantially all of the deposits of First Federal are insured up to applicable 
limits  by  the  Deposit  Insurance  Fund  of  the  FDIC,  and  First  Federal  is  assessed  deposit  insurance 
premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund. Insurance premiums for each insured institution are 
determined based upon the institution’s capital level and supervisory rating provided to the FDIC by the 
institution’s  primary  federal regulator and other information deemed by the FDIC to be relevant to the 
risk  posed  to  the  Deposit  Insurance  Fund  by  the  institution.  The  assessment  rate is then applied to the 
amount of the institution’s deposits to determine the institution’s insurance premium. 

The deposit insurance assessment base is average assets less average tangible equity. The FDIC
set a target size for the Deposit Insurance Fund at 2% of insured deposits and a lower assessment rate 
schedule when the fund reaches 1.15% and, in lieu of dividends, the FDIC rule provides for a lower rate 
schedule when the reserve ratio reaches 2% and 2.5%.   On June 30, 2016, the Deposit Insurance Fund 
surpassed  its  target of 1.15%, decreasing the assessment base based on the final rules approved by the 
FDIC Board of Directors on February 7, 2011, and April 26, 2016.  The change to the assessment base 
and  assessment  rates,  as  well  as  the  Deposit  Insurance  Fund  restoration  time  frame,  has  lowered  First 
Defiance’s deposit insurance assessment.

In addition, the FDIC has proposed changing the deposit insurance premium assessment method 
for banks with less than $10 billion in assets that have been insured by the FDIC for at least five years.  
The proposed changes would revise the financial ratios method so that it would be based on a statistical 
model estimating the probability of failure of a bank over three years; update the financial measures used
in  the  financial  ratios  method  consistent  with  the  statistical  model;  and  eliminate  risk  categories  for 
established small banks and using the financial ratios method to determine assessment rates for all such 
banks  (subject  to  minimum  or  maximum  initial  assessment  rates  based  upon  a  bank’s  composite 
examination rating). 

As  insurer,  the  FDIC  is  authorized  to  conduct  examinations  of,  and  to  require  reporting  by, 
federally-insured institutions.  It also may prohibit any federally-insured institution from engaging in any 
activity  the  FDIC  determines  by  regulation  or  order  to  pose  a  serious  threat  to  the  Deposit  Insurance 
Fund. The FDIC also has the authority to take enforcement actions against insured institutions.  Insurance 
of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged or is engaging 
in  unsafe  and  unsound  practices,  is  in  an  unsafe  or  unsound  condition  to  continue  operations  or  has 
violated  any  applicable  law,  regulation,  rule,  order  or  condition  imposed  by  the  FDIC or  written 
agreement entered into with the FDIC. The management of First Federal does not know of any practice, 
condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance. 

- 22 - 

- 22 -

 
Item 1A. Risk Factors

The risks listed below present risks that could have a material impact on the Company’s financial 
condition, results of operations, or business. The risks and uncertainties described below are the not the 
only  ones  facing  the  Company.  Additional  risks  and  uncertainties  that  management  is  not  aware  of  or 
focused  on  or  that  management  currently  deems  immaterial  may  also  impair  the  Company’s  business 
operations.   

Economic and financial market conditions may adversely affect First Defiance’s operations and 
financial condition.

First Defiance’s financial performance generally, and in particular the ability of borrowers to pay 
interest on and repay principal of outstanding loans and the value of collateral securing those loans, as 
well as demand for loans and other products and services First Defiance offers, is highly dependent upon 
the business environment in the markets where the Company operates, mainly in the State of Ohio and in 
the  Great  Lake  Region.  A  favorable  business  environment  is  generally  characterized  by,  among  other 
factors, economic growth, efficient capital markets, low inflation, low unemployment, high business and 
investor  confidence,  and  strong  business  earnings.  Unfavorable  or  uncertain  economic  and  market 
conditions  can  be  caused  by  declines  in  economic  growth,  business  activity  or  investor  or  business 
confidence;  limitations  on  the  availability  or  increases  in  the  cost  of  credit  and  capital;  increases  in 
inflation  or  interest  rates;  high  unemployment,  natural  disasters;  or  a  combination  of  these  or  other 
factors. Conditions  such  as  inflation,  recession,  unemployment,  changes  in  interest  rates,  fiscal  and 
monetary policy and other factors beyond First Defiance’s control may adversely affect its deposit levels 
and composition, demand for loans, the ability of its borrowers to repay their loans and the value of the 
collateral  securing  the  loans  it  makes.    Economic  turmoil  in  Europe  and  Asia  and  changes  in  oil 
production in the Middle East affect the economy and stock prices in the United States, which can affect 
First  Defiance’s  earnings  and  capital  and  the  ability  of  its  customers  to  repay  loans.    Because  First 
Defiance  has  a  significant  amount  of  real  estate  loans,  decreases  in  real  estate  values  could  adversely 
affect  the  value  of  property  used  as  collateral  and  First  Defiance’s  ability  to  sell  the  collateral  upon 
foreclosure.

First  Defiance’s  loan  portfolio  includes  a  concentration  of  commercial  real  estate  loans  and 
commercial loans, which involve risks specific to real estate value and the successful operations of 
these businesses.

At  December  31,  2016,  First  Federal’s  portfolio  of  commercial  real  estate  loans  totaled  $1.0
billion,  or  approximately  51.1%  of  total  loans.    First  Federal’s  commercial  real  estate  loans  typically 
have higher principal amounts than residential real estate loans, and many of our commercial real estate 
borrowers have more than one loan outstanding.  As a result, an adverse development on one loan can 
expose  First  Defiance  to  greater  risk  of  loss  on  other  loans.    Additionally,  repayment  of  the  loans  is
generally dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loans to cover 
operating  expenses  and  debt  service.    Economic  conditions  and  events  outside  of  the  control  of  the 
borrower  or  lender  could  negatively  impact  the  future  cash  flow  and  market  values  of  the  affected 
properties. 

At December 31, 2016, First Federal’s portfolio of commercial loans totaled $469.1 million, or 
approximately 23.1% of total loans.  Commercial loans generally expose First Defiance to a greater risk 
of  nonpayment  and  loss  than  commercial  real estate  or  residential real estate loans since repayment of 
such  loans  often  depends  on  the  successful  operations  and  income  stream  of  the  borrowers.  First 
Federal’s  commercial  loans  are  primarily  made  based  on  the  identified  cash  flow  of  the  borrower  and 
secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower such as accounts receivable, inventory, 
machinery or real estate. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for 
the  repayment  of  these  loans  may  be  substantially  dependent  on  the  ability  of  the  borrower  to  collect 
amounts due from its customers. The collateral securing other loans may depreciate over time, may be 
difficult  to  appraise  and  may  fluctuate  in  value  based  on  the  success  of  the  business.  Credit  support 

- 23 - 

- 23 -

 
 
provided  by  the  borrower  for  most  of  these  loans  and  the  probability  of  repayment  is  based  on  the 
liquidation of the pledged collateral and enforcement of a personal guarantee, if any exists.  

First Defiance targets its business lending towards small and medium-sized businesses, many of 
which have fewer financial resources than larger companies and may be more susceptible to economic 
downturns. If general economic conditions negatively impact these businesses, First Defiance’s results of 
operations and financial condition may be adversely affected. 

Increases to the allowance for loan losses may cause First Defiance’s earnings to decrease.

First Federal makes a number of assumptions and judgments about the collectability of its loan 
portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets 
serving  as  collateral  for  the  repayment  of  loans.  In  determining  the  amount  of  the  allowance  for  loan 
losses, First Federal relies on loan quality reviews, past loss experience, and an evaluation of economic 
conditions,  among  other  factors.  If  its  assumptions  prove  to  be  incorrect,  First  Federal’s allowance for 
loan  losses  may  not  be  sufficient  to  cover  actual  losses, resulting  in  additions  to  the  allowance.  In 
addition, bank regulators periodically review First Federal’s allowance and may require First Federal to 
increase its allowance. Material additions to the allowance and any loan losses that exceed First Federal’s
reserves would materially adversely affect First Defiance’s results of operations and financial condition. 

Changes in interest rates can adversely affect First Defiance’s profitability.

First Defiance’s earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon its net interest income. Net 
interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets such as loans 
and  securities  and  interest  expense  paid  on  interest-bearing  liabilities  such  as  deposits  and  borrowed 
funds.  Interest  rates  are  highly  sensitive  to  many  factors  that  are  beyond  First  Defiance’s  control, 
including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, 
in  particular,  the  Federal  Open  Market  Committee.  Changes  in  monetary  policy,  including  changes  in 
interest rates, could influence not only the interest First Defiance receives on loans and securities and the 
amount  of  interest  it  pays  on  deposits  and  borrowings,  but  such  changes  could  also  affect  (i) First 
Defiance’s ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the fair value of First Defiance’s financial 
assets  and  liabilities,  and  (iii) the  average  duration  of  certain  assets  and  liabilities.  If  the  interest  rates 
paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans 
and  other  investments,  First  Defiance’s net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely 
affected.  Earnings  could  also  be  adversely  affected  if  the  interest  rates  received  on  loans  and  other 
investments  fall  more  quickly  than  the  interest  rates  paid  on  deposits  and  other  borrowings.  Any 
substantial, unexpected, prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on 
First Defiance’s results of operations and financial condition. 

First  Federal  originates  a  significant  amount  of  residential  mortgage  loans  that  it  sells  in  the 
secondary  market.    The  origination  of  residential  mortgage  loans  is  highly  dependent  on  the  local  real 
estate  market  and  the  current  interest  rates.    Increasing  interest  rates  tend  to  reduce  the  origination  of 
loans for sale and consequently fee income, which First Defiance reports as mortgage banking income. 
Conversely, decreasing interest rates have the effect of causing clients to refinance mortgage loans faster 
than anticipated.  This causes the value of mortgage servicing rights on the loans sold to be lower than 
originally  anticipated.    If  this  happens,  First  Defiance  may  be  required  to  write  down  the  value  of  its 
mortgage  servicing  rights  faster  than  anticipated,  which  will  increase  expense  and  lower  earnings.  
Accelerated  repayments  on  loans  and  mortgage  backed  securities  could  result  in  the  reinvestment  of 
funds at lower rates than the loans or securities were paying.  

 Laws and regulations may affect First Defiance’s results of operations.

The  earnings  of  financial  institutions  are  affected  by  the  regulations  and  policies  of  various 
regulatory  authorities,  including  the  Federal  Reserve, the  OCC,  the  FDIC  and  the  CFPB.   The Federal 
Reserve has  extensive  supervisory  authority  over  the  Company,  affecting  a  comprehensive  range  of 

- 24 - 

- 24 -

matters relating to ownership and control of First Defiance’s shares, First Defiance’s acquisition of other 
companies and businesses, permissible activities for the Company to engage in, maintenance of adequate 
capital  levels  and  other  aspects  of  operations.    These  supervisory  and  regulatory  powers  are  intended 
primarily for the protection of First Defiance’s depositors and borrowers and the deposit insurance fund,
rather than First Defiance’s shareholders.

Comprehensive  revisions  to  the  regulatory  capital  framework  were  finalized by  the  Federal 
Reserve, the OCC, and the FDIC in 2013. The revised regulations change what qualifies as regulatory 
capital, raises minimum requirements, and introduces the concept of additional capital buffers. The need 
to  maintain  more  and  higher  quality  capital  as  well  as  greater  liquidity  going  forward  could  limit  our 
business  activities,  including  lending,  and  our  ability  to  expand, either  organically  or  through 
acquisitions.  In addition, the new liquidity standards could require us to increase our holdings of highly 
liquid  short-term  investments,  thereby  reducing  our ability to invest in longer-term assets even if more 
desirable from a balance sheet management perspective. 

The  laws  and  regulations  applicable  to  the  banking  industry  could  change  at  any  time.    The 
potential exists for new laws and regulations, and bank regulatory agencies are expected to be active in 
responding  to  concerns  and trends identified in examinations. Increased regulation could increase First 
Defiance’s  cost  of compliance and reduce its income to the extent that they limit the manner in which 
First Defiance may conduct business, including its ability to offer new products, charge fees for specific 
products  and  services,  obtain  financing,  attract  deposits,  make  loans  and  achieve  satisfactory  interest 
spreads.

First  Defiance’s  ability  to  meet  cash  flow  needs  on  a  timely  basis  at  a  reasonable  cost  may 
adversely affect net income.

First Defiance’s principal sources of liquidity are local deposits and wholesale funding sources 
such  as  FHLB  advances,  Federal  Funds  purchased,  securities  sold  under  repurchase  agreements,  and 
brokered  or  other  out-of-market  certificate  of  deposit  purchases.    Also,  First  Defiance  maintains  a 
portfolio  of  securities  that  can  be  used  as  a  secondary  source  of  liquidity.    First  Defiance’s  access  to 
funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize its activities or on terms that are acceptable 
could  be  impaired  by  factors  that  affect  First  Defiance  directly  or  the  financial  services  industry  or 
economy  in  general,  such  as  further  disruptions  in  the  financial  markets  or  negative  views  and 
expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry.  

Other  possible  sources  of  liquidity  include  the  sale  or  securitization  of  loans,  the  issuance  of 
additional collateralized borrowings beyond those currently utilized with the FHLB, the issuance of debt 
securities  and  the  issuance  of  preferred  or  common  securities  in  public  or  private  transactions,  or 
borrowings  from  a  commercial  bank.    First  Defiance  does  not  currently  have  any  borrowings  from  a 
commercial bank, but it has used them in the past.   

Any decline in available funding could adversely impact our ability to originate loans, invest in 
securities, meet our expenses, pay dividends to First Defiance’s shareholders, or fulfill obligations such 
as  repaying  First  Defiance’s  borrowings  or  meeting  deposit  withdrawal  demands, any  of  which  could 
have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, business, results of operations and financial condition.   

Competition affects First Defiance’s earnings.

First Defiance’s continued profitability depends on its ability to continue to effectively compete 
to originate loans and attract and retain deposits.  Competition for both loans and deposits is intense in 
the financial services industry.  The Company competes in its market area by offering superior service 
and competitive rates and products.  The type of institutions First Defiance competes with include large 
regional  commercial  banks,  smaller  community  banks,  savings  institutions,  mortgage  banking  firms, 
credit unions, finance companies, brokerage firms, insurance agencies and mutual funds.  As a result of 
their size and ability to achieve economies of scale, certain of First Defiance’s competitors can offer a 

- 25 - 

- 25 -

broader  range  of  products  and  services  than  the  Company  can  offer.  To  stay  competitive  in  its  market 
area, First Defiance may need to adjust the interest rates on its products to match rates of its competition, 
which could have a negative impact on net interest margin.  

The increasing complexity of First Defiance’s operations presents varied risks that could affect its 
earnings and financial condition.

First  Defiance  processes  a  large  volume  of  transactions  on  a  daily  basis  and  is  exposed  to 
numerous types of risks related to internal processes, people and systems.  These risks include, but are 
not limited to, the risk of fraud by persons inside or outside the Company, the execution of unauthorized 
transactions  by  employees,  errors  relating  to  transaction  processing  and  systems,  breaches  of  data 
security  and  our  internal  control  system  and  compliance  with  a  complex  array  of  consumer  and  safety 
and  soundness  regulations.  First  Defiance  could  also  experience  additional  loss  as  a result of potential 
legal actions that could arise as a result of operational deficiencies or as a result of noncompliance with 
applicable laws and regulations.  

First  Defiance  has  established  and  maintains  a  system  of  internal  controls  that  provides 
management  with  information  on  a  timely  basis  and  allows  for  the  monitoring  of  compliance  with 
operational standards.  These systems have been designed to manage operational risks at an appropriate, 
cost effective level.  Procedures exist that are designed to ensure that policies relating to conduct, ethics, 
and business practices are followed.  Losses from operational risks may still occur, however, including 
losses from the effects of operational errors.  

Unauthorized  disclosure  of  sensitive  or  confidential  client  or  customer  information,  whether 
through  a  breach  of  the  Company’s computer  systems  or  otherwise,  could  severely  harm  its
business.

Potential misuse of funds or information by First Defiance’s employees or by third parties could 
result in damage to First Defiance’s customers for which First Defiance could be held liable, subject First 
Defiance to regulatory sanctions and otherwise adversely affect First Defiance’s financial condition and 
results of operations.   

First  Defiance’s  employees  handle  a  significant  amount  of  funds,  as  well  as  financial  and 
personal  information.    Although  First  Defiance  has  implemented  systems  to  minimize  the  risk  of 
fraudulent taking or misuse of funds or information, there can be no assurance that such systems will be 
adequate  or  that  a  taking  or  misuse  of  funds  or  information  by  employees,  by  third  parties  who  have 
authorized access to funds or information, or by third parties who are able to access funds or information 
without authorization will never occur.  First Defiance could be held liable for such an event and could 
also  be  subject  to  regulatory  sanctions.    First  Defiance  could  also  incur  the  expense  of  developing
additional controls to prevent future such occurrences.  Although First Defiance has insurance to cover 
such  potential  losses,  First  Defiance  cannot  provide  assurance  that  such  insurance  will  be  adequate  to 
meet any liability.   In addition, any loss of trust or confidence placed in First Defiance by our clients 
could  result  in  a  loss  of  business,  which  could  adversely  affect  our  financial  condition  and  results  of 
operations.  

First Defiance could suffer a material adverse impact from interruptions in the effective operation 
of, or security breaches affecting, First Defiance’s computer systems.

First  Defiance  relies  heavily  on  information  systems  to  conduct  our  business  and  to  process, 
record, and monitor transactions.  Risks to the system could result from a variety of factors, including the 
potential  for  bad  acts  on  the  part  of  hackers,  criminals,  employees  and  others.    As  one example, some 
banks have experienced denial of service attacks in which individuals or organizations flood the bank’s 
website with extraordinarily high volumes of traffic, with the goal and effect of disrupting the ability of 
the  bank  to  process  transactions.    First  Defiance  is  also  at  risk  for  the  impact  of  natural  disasters, 
terrorism  and  international  hostilities  on  its  systems  or  for  the  effects  of  outages  or  other  failures 

- 26 - 

- 26 -

involving  power  or  communications  systems  operated  by  others.    These risks also arise from the same 
types of threats to businesses with which First Defiance deals.  

Potential adverse consequences of attacks on First Defiance’s computer systems or other threats 
include  damage  to  First  Defiance’s  reputation,  loss  of  customer  business,  litigation  and  increased 
regulatory scrutiny, which might also result in financial loss and require additional efforts and expense to 
attempt to prevent such adverse consequences in the future.       

If  First  Defiance  forecloses  on  collateral  property  resulting  in  First  Defiance’s  ownership  of the 
underlying  real  estate,  First  Defiance  may  be  subject  to  the  increased  costs  associated  with  the 
ownership of real property, resulting in reduced income.

A significant portion of First Defiance’s loan portfolio is secured by real property.  During the 
ordinary course of business, First Defiance may foreclose on and take title to properties securing certain 
loans.  In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties.  
If hazardous or toxic substances are found, First Defiance may be liable for remediation costs, as well as 
for personal injury and property damage.  

In addition, when First Defiance forecloses on real property, the amount First Defiance realizes 
after a default is dependent upon factors outside of First Defiance’s control, including, but not limited to, 
economic conditions, neighborhood real estate values, interest rates, real estate taxes, operating expenses 
of the mortgaged properties, zoning laws, governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, and acts of 
God.  Certain expenditures associated with the ownership of real estate, principally real estate taxes and 
maintenance costs, may adversely affect the income from the real estate.  Therefore, the cost of operating 
real property may exceed the rental income earned from such property, and First Defiance may have to 
sell the property at a loss.  The foregoing expenditures could adversely affect First Defiance’s financial 
condition and results of operations. 

First  Defiance’s  business  strategy  includes  planned  growth.    First  Defiance’s  financial  condition 
and  results  of  operations  could  be  negatively  affected  if  First  Defiance  fails  to  grow  or  fails  to 
manage its growth effectively. 

First  Defiance’s  ability  to  grow  successfully  will  depend  on  a  variety  of  factors,  including  the 
continued availability of desirable business opportunities, its ability to integrate acquisitions and manage 
growth and First Defiance’s ability to raise capital.  There can be no assurance that growth opportunities 
will be available.

First Defiance may acquire other financial institutions or parts of institutions in the future, open 
new  branches,  and  consider  new  lines  of  business  and  new  products  or  services.    Expansions  of  its 
business would involve a number of expenses and risks, including: 

• the time and costs associated with identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions or expansions 

into new markets;

• the potential inaccuracy of estimates and judgments used to evaluate the business and risks with 

respect to target institutions;

• the time and costs of hiring local management and opening new offices; 
• the delay between commencing making acquisitions or engaging in new activities and the 

generation of profits from the expansion; 

• First Defiance’s ability to finance an expansion and the possible dilution to existing 

shareholders;  

• the diversion of management’s attention to the expansion; 
• management’s lack of familiarity with new market areas;
• the integration of new products and services and new personnel into First Defiance’s existing 

business;

- 27 - 

- 27 -

• the incurrence and possible impairment of goodwill associated with an acquisition and effects on 

First Defiance’s results of operations; and
• the risk of loss of key employees and customers.

If First Defiance’s growth involves the acquisition of companies through merger, the success of 
the merger will depend on, among other things, First Defiance’s ability to combine the businesses in a 
manner  that  permits  growth  opportunities  and  cost  efficiencies,  and  does  not  cause  inconsistencies  in 
standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect the ability of First Defiance to maintain 
relationships with customers and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger. 

Failure to manage First Defiance’s growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on its 
business,  future  prospects,  financial  condition  or  results  of  operations  and  could  adversely  affect  First 
Defiance’s ability to successfully implement its business strategy.  

First  Defiance’s  ability  to  pay  dividends  is  subject  to  regulatory  limitations  which,  to  the  extent 
First  Defiance  requires  such  dividends  in  the  future,  may  affect  its  ability  to  pay  dividends  or 
repurchase its stock.

As  a  savings  and  loan  holding  company,  First  Defiance  is  a  separate  legal  entity  from  First 
Federal  and  does  not  have  significant  operations  of  its  own.    Dividends  from  First  Federal  provide  a 
significant source of capital for First Defiance.  The availability of dividends from First Federal is limited 
by  various  statutes  and  regulations.  The  federal  banking  regulators  require  that  insured  financial 
institutions  and  their  holding  companies  should  generally  only  pay  dividends  out  of  current  operating 
earnings.  It is possible, depending upon the financial condition of First Federal and other factors, that the 
OCC, as First Federal’s primary regulator, could assert that the payment of dividends or other payments 
by First Federal are an unsafe or unsound practice.  In the event First Federal is unable to pay dividends 
to First Defiance, First Defiance may not be able to pay its obligations as they become due, repurchase its 
stock, or pay dividends on its common stock.  Consequently, the potential inability to receive dividends 
from  First  Defiance  could  adversely  affect  First  Defiance’s  business,  financial  condition,  results  of 
operations or prospects. 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 

None. 

Item 2. Properties

At December 31, 2016, First Federal conducted its business from its main office at 601 Clinton 
Street,  Defiance,  Ohio,  and  thirty-three  other  full-service  banking  centers  in  northwest  Ohio,  northeast 
Indiana and southeast Michigan. First Insurance conducted its business from leased office space at 511 
Fifth  Street,  Defiance,  Ohio;  209  West  Poe  Road,  Bowling  Green,  Ohio;  204  East High Street, Bryan, 
Ohio; 1755 Indian Wood Circle, Maumee, Ohio; 4350 Navarre Ave, Oregon, Ohio and 2600 Allentown 
Road, Lima, Ohio. 

In August 2016, First Federal received approval to transition its loan production office at 4501
Cemetery Road, Hilliard, Ohio to a full-service branch. The transition will be completed late in the first 
quarter of 2017.  This office is owned. 

First Defiance maintains its headquarters in the main office of First Federal at 601 Clinton Street, 
Defiance,  Ohio.  Back-office  operation  departments,  including  information  technology,  loan  processing 
and  underwriting,  deposit  processing,  accounting  and  risk  management  are  headquartered  in  an 
operations center located at 25600 Elliott Road, Defiance, Ohio. 

- 28 - 

- 28 -

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the offices and other properties 

of the Company at December 31, 2016. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Description/address 

Main Office, First Federal
601 Clinton St., Defiance, OH
Operations Center
25600 Elliott Rd., Defiance, OH
Mobile Banking
1011 W. Beecher St., Adrian, MI
Branch Offices, First Federal
204 E. High St., Bryan, OH
211 S. Fulton St., Wauseon, OH
625 Scott St., Napoleon, OH
1050 E. Main St., Montpelier, OH
1800 Scott St., Napoleon, OH
1177 N. Clinton St., Defiance, OH
905 N. Williams St., Paulding, OH
201 E. High St., Hicksville, OH
3900 N. Main St., Findlay, OH
1694 N. Countyline St., Fostoria, OH
1226 W. Wooster St., Bowling Green, OH
301 S. Main St., Findlay, OH
405 E. Main St., Ottawa, OH
124 E. Main St., McComb, OH
7591 Patriot Dr., Findlay, OH
417 W. Dussel Dr., Maumee, OH
230 E. Second St., Delphos, OH
105 S. Greenlawn Ave., Elida, OH
2600 Allentown Rd., Lima, OH
22020 W. State Rt. 51, Genoa, OH
3426 Navarre Ave., Oregon, OH
1077 Louisiana Ave., Perrysburg, OH
2565 Shawnee Rd., Lima, OH
1595 W. Dupont Rd., Fort Wayne, IN
135 S. Main St., Glandorf, OH
300 N. Main St., Adrian, MI
1701 W. Maumee St., Adrian, MI
211 W. Main St., Morenci, MI
539 S. Meridian Hwy., Hudson, MI
1449 W. Chicago Blvd., Tecumseh, MI
1200 N. Main St., Bowling Green OH
9909 Illinois Rd, Fort Wayne, IN
4501 Cemetery Rd, Hilliard, OH
2920 W. Central Ave., Toledo, OH

First Insurance Group
511 Fifth St., Defiance, OH
209 W. Poe Rd., Bowling Green, OH
204 E. High St., Bryan, OH
1755 Indian Wood Cir., Maumee, OH
4350 Navarre Ave., Oregon, OH
2600 Allentown Rd., Lima, OH

Leased/
Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned

Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned, Land Lease 
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned, Land Lease
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Leased
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned

Net Book Valu
of Property

Deposits

(In Thousands)

$

3,225

$

230,654

4,807

170

538
345
877
225
1,126
730
653
288
813
561
877
786
279
160
1,029
707
862
284
929
736
810
389
1,253
-
-
613
190
165
494
1,384
1,558
1,931
966
165

N/A

N/A

157,476
75,865
79,074
43,705
32,747
41,753
85,946
29,753
56,206
53,499
113,248
66,427
92,914
22,646
45,127
76,061
98,143
42,443
44,419
33,705
38,547
41,871
39,393
19,549
16,474
82,230
47,233
30,416
45,950
59,648
10,093
26,915
270
1,228

Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased

463
-
-
-
-
-
31,388

$

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$ 1,981,628

- 29 - 

- 29 -

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

First  Defiance  is  involved  in  routine  legal  proceedings  that  are  incidental  to  and  occur  in  the 
ordinary course of business which, in the aggregate, are believed by management to be immaterial to the 
financial condition of First Defiance. 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer 

Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s common shares trade on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol 

“FDEF.” As of February 20, 2017, the Company had approximately 1,782 shareholders of record. 

The  table  below  shows  the  reported  high  and  low  sales  prices  of  the  common  shares and  cash 

dividends declared per common share during the periods indicated in 2016 and 2015. 

Year Ending

December 31, 2016
Low

Dividend

High

December 31, 2015
Low

Dividend

High

Quarter ended:
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31

$ 40.98
41.21
46.83
52.31

$ 34.80
37.53
35.90
36.91

$ 0.22
0.22
0.22
0.22

$ 34.64
38.21
39.95
42.46

$ 29.05
32.42
35.03
35.01

$0.175
0.20
0.20
0.20

The line graph below compares the yearly percentage change in cumulative total shareholder return 
on  First  Defiance  common  shares and the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Composite Index, the 
SNL NASDAQ Bank Index and the SNL Midwest Thrift Index. An investment of $100 on December 31, 
2011,  and  the  reinvestment  of  all  dividends  are  assumed.  The  performance  graph  represents  past 
performance and should not be considered to be an indication of future performance.

- 30 - 

- 30 -

Index
First Defiance Financial Corp.
NASDAQ Composite
SNL Bank NASDAQ
SNL Midwest Thrift

12/31/11
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00

12/31/12
133.10
117.45
119.19
129.30

Period Ending

12/31/13
183.16
164.57
171.31
159.45

12/31/14
245.58
188.84
177.42
182.24

12/31/15
278.23
201.98
191.53
223.15

12/31/16
381.92
219.89
265.56
268.71

The  following  table  provides  information  regarding  First  Defiance’s  purchases  of  its  common 

shares during the fourth quarter period ended December 31, 2016: 

Period
October 1 – October 31, 2016
November 1 – November 30, 2016
December 1 – December 31, 2016
Total 

Total Number 
of Shares 
Purchased

-
-
122
122

Average 
Price Paid 
Per Share
$

-
-
50.74
$50.74

Total Number of 
Shares 
Purchased as 
Part of Publicly 
Announced Plans 
or Programs 

Maximum Number of 
Shares (or Approximate 
Dollar Value) that May 
Yet Be Purchased Under 
the Plans or Programs 
(1)

-
-
-
-

377,500
377,500
377,500
377,500

(1) On January 29, 2016, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized another program for 

the repurchase of up to 5% of the outstanding common shares or 450,000 shares.  There is no expiration 
date for the new repurchase program.  

- 31 - 

- 31 -

The  information  set  forth  under  the caption  “Item  12.    Security  Ownership  of  Certain 
Beneficial  Owners  and  Management  and  Related  Stockholder  Matters  − Equity  Compensation 
Plans” of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

- 32 - 

- 32 -

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table is derived from the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the 
five years ended December 31, 2016. The following consolidated selected financial data should be read 
in  conjunction  with  Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and  Results  of 
Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 
10-K. The operating results of acquired companies are included with the Company’s results of operations 
since their respective dates of acquisition. 

Financial Condition:

Total assets
Investment securities
Loans receivable, net
Allowance for loan losses
Nonperforming assets (1)
Deposits and borrowers’ escrow balances
FHLB advances
Stockholders’ equity

Share Information:

Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share 
Book value per common share
Tangible book value per common share (2)
Cash dividends per common share
Dividend payout ratio
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
Shares outstanding end of period

Operations:

Interest income 
Interest expense
Net interest income 
Provision for loan losses
Non-interest income
Non-interest expense
Income before tax
Federal income tax
Net Income

Performance Ratios:

Return on average assets
Return on average equity
Interest rate spread (2)
Net interest margin (2)
Ratio of operating expense to 

average total assets 

Efficiency ratio (2)

Other Ratios:

Equity to total assets at end of period
Average equity to average assets

Asset Quality Ratios:

Nonperforming assets to total assets

at end of period (1)

Allowance for loan losses to total

loans*

Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans

2016

$ 2,477,597
251,176
1,914,603
25,884
14,803
1,984,278
103,943
293,018

$

3.21
3.19
32.62
25.59
0.88
27.41%
9,035
8,983

87,383
8,440
78,943
283
34,030
71,093
41,597
12,754
28,843

1.20%
10.10%
3.61%
3.74%

2.97%
62.20%

11.83%
11.91%

0.60%

1.33%
-0.01%

As of and For the Year Ended December 31
2014
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

2013

2015

$ 2,297,676
236,678
1,776,835
25,382
17,582
1,838,811
59,902
280,197

$ 2,178,952
239,634
1,622,020
24,766
30,311
1,763,122
21,544
279,505

$ 2,137,148
198,557
1,555,498
24,950
33,706
1,737,311
22,520
272,147

$

2.87
2.82
30.78
23.79
0.775
27.00%
9,371
9,102

80,836
6,781
74,055
136
31,803
67,889
37,833
11,410
26,423

1.19%
9.52%
3.71%
3.81%

3.05%
63.01%

12.19%
12.49%

0.77%

1.41%
-0.03%

$

2.55
2.44
30.17
23.25
0.625
24.51%
9,969
9,235

76,248
6,559
69,689
1,117
31,641
66,758
33,455
9,163
24,292

1.12%
8.78%
3.57%
3.68%

3.09%
65.32%

12.83%
12.79%

1.39%

1.50%
0.08%

$

2.28
2.19
27.91
21.22
0.40
17.45%
10,171
9,720

74,781
7,170
67,611
1,824
30,778
65,052
31,513
9,278
22,235

1.08%
8.39%
3.65%
3.76%

3.16%
64.81%

12.73%
12.92%

1.58%

1.58%
0.23%

2012

$ 2,046,948
194,609
1,498,546
26,711
36,375
1,668,945
12,796
258,128

$

1.86
1.81
26.44
19.63
0.20
10.75%
9,998
9,729

80,943
11,937
69,006
10,924
34,374
65,780
26,676
8,012
18,664

0.90%
6.99%
3.64%
3.81%

3.19%
63.93%

12.61%
12.95%

1.78%

1.75%
1.18%

(1)

Nonperforming assets include non-accrual loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more and real estate, mobile homes and 

other assets acquired by foreclosure or deed-in-lieu thereof.

(2) 

 Refer to Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Item 7- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of 

Operations.

* Total loans are net of undisbursed loan funds and deferred fees and costs.

- 33 - 

- 33 -

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements and Factors that Could Affect Future Results 

Certain  statements  contained  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  that  are  not  statements  of 
historical  fact  constitute  forward-looking  statements  within  the  meaning  of  the  Private  Securities 
Litigation  Reform  Act  of  1995  (“Act”),  notwithstanding  that  such  statements  are  not  specifically 
identified as such. In addition, certain statements may be contained in the Company’s future filings with
the  SEC,  in  press  releases,  and  in  oral  and  written  statements  made  by  or  with  the  approval  of  the 
Corporation that are not statements of historical fact and constitute forward-looking statements within the 
meaning  of  the  Act.  Examples  of  forward-looking  statements  include,  but  are  not  limited  to: 
(i) projections of revenues, expenses, income or loss, earnings or loss per common share, the payment or 
nonpayment of dividends, capital structure and other financial items; (ii) statements of plans, objectives
and expectations of First Defiance or its management or Board of Directors, including those relating to 
products or services; (iii) statements of future economic performance; and (iv) statements of assumptions 
underlying  such  statements.  Words  such  as  “believes”,  “anticipates”,  “expects”,  “intends”,  “targeted”, 
“continue”,  “remain”,  “will”,  “should”,  “may”  and  other  similar  expressions  are  intended  to  identify 
forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. 

Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ 
materially  from  those  in  such  statements.  Factors  that  could  cause  actual  results  to  differ  from  those 
discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: 

• Local, regional, national and international economic conditions and the impact they may have on 

the Company and its customers and the Company’s assessment of that impact.

• Volatility and disruption in national and international financial markets.

• Government intervention in the U.S. financial system. 

• Changes in the level of non-performing assets and charge-offs.

• Changes  in  estimates  of  future  reserve  requirements  based  upon  the  periodic  review  thereof 

under relevant regulatory and accounting requirements. 

• The  effects  of  and  changes  in  trade  and  monetary  and  fiscal  policies  and  laws,  including  the 

interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve.

Inflation, interest rate, securities market and monetary fluctuations.

Political instability.

•

•

• Acts of God or of war or terrorism.

• The  timely  development  and  acceptance  of  new  products  and  services  and  perceived  overall 

value of these products and services by users.

• Changes in consumer spending, borrowing and saving habits. 

• Changes in the financial performance and/or condition of the Company’s borrowers. 

• Technological changes including core system conversions.

• Acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses. 

• The ability to increase market share and control expenses.

• Changes in the competitive environment among financial holding companies and other financial 

service providers.

• The effect of changes in laws and regulations (including laws and regulations concerning taxes, 
banking, securities and insurance) with which the Company and the Subsidiaries must comply. 

- 34 - 

- 34 -

• The effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory 
agencies, as well as the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Financial Accounting 
Standards Board and other accounting standard setters. 

• The  costs  and  effects  of  legal  and  regulatory  developments  including  the  resolution  of  legal 
proceedings  or  regulatory  or  other  governmental  inquiries  and  the  results  of  regulatory 
examinations or reviews.

• Greater than expected costs or difficulties related to the integration of new products and lines of 

business.

• The Company’s success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing items.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made. The 
Company  undertakes  no  obligation  to  update  any  forward-looking  statement  to  reflect  events  or 
circumstances  after  the  date  on  which  such  statement  is  made  or  to  reflect  the  occurrence  of 
unanticipated events.  

The  following  section  presents  information  to  assess  the financial  condition  and  results  of 
operations  of  First  Defiance.  This  section  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  the  Consolidated  Financial 
Statements and the supplemental financial data contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This  document  contains  GAAP  financial  measures  and  certain  non-GAAP  financial  measures
which are presented as management believes they are helpful in understanding the Company’s results of 
operations or financial position.  Fully taxable-equivalent (“FTE”) is an adjustment to net interest income 
to  reflect  tax-exempt  income  on  an  equivalent  before-tax  basis.    The  following  tables  present  a 
reconciliation  of  non-GAAP  measures  to  their  respective  GAAP  measures  at  December  31,  2016  and 
2015.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures – Net Interest Income on an 
FTE basis, Net Interest Margin and Efficiency Ratio

($ in Thousands)
Net interest income (GAAP)
Add: FTE adjustment
Net interest income on a FTE basis (1)

Noninterest income – less securities gains/losses (2)
Noninterest expense (3)
Average interest-earning assets less average unrealized gains/losses on securities(4)

Average interest-earning assets
Average unrealized gains/losses on securities

Ratios:
Net interest margin (1) / (4)
Efficiency ratio (3) / (1) + (2)

Non-GAAP Financial Measures – Tangible Book Value

($ in Thousands, except per share data)
Total Shareholders’ Equity (GAAP)
Less:

Goodwill
Intangible assets

Tangible common equity (1)

Common shares outstanding (2)

Tangible book value per share (1) / (2)

$

$

$

$

$

$

- 35 - 

- 35 -

December 31,
2016

December 31,
2015

78,943
1,830
80,773

33,521
71,093
2,160,561
2,153,076
7,485

3.74%
62.20%

$

$

$

74,055
1,905
75,960

31,781
67,889
1,993,311
1,986,145
7,166

3.81%
63.01%

December 31,
2016

293,018
(61,798)
(1,336)
229,884

8,983

25.59

December 31,
2015
280,197
(61,798)
(1,871)
216,528

$

$

9,102

23.79

$

Overview

First Defiance is a unitary thrift holding company that conducts business through the Subsidiaries, 

First Federal, First Insurance and First Defiance Risk Management.

First  Federal  is  a  federally  chartered  stock  savings  bank  that  provides  financial  services  to 
communities based in northwest Ohio, northeast Indiana, and southeastern Michigan where it operates 34 
full  service  banking  centers  in  twelve northwest  Ohio  counties,  one northeast  Indiana  county,  and  one
southeastern Michigan county. First Federal operates one loan production office in one central Ohio county, 
which will become a full-service branch late in the first quarter of 2017.  

First  Federal  provides  a  broad  range  of  financial  services  including  checking  accounts,  savings 
accounts, certificates of deposit, real estate mortgage loans, commercial loans, consumer loans, home equity 
loans and trust and wealth management services through its extensive branch network.

First  Insurance  sells  a  variety  of  property  and  casualty,  group  health  and  life  and  individual 
health  and  life  insurance  products.  First  Insurance  is  an  insurance  agency  that  does  business  in  the 
Defiance, Bryan, Bowling Green, Lima, Maumee and Oregon, Ohio areas.  

First  Defiance  Risk  Management is  a  wholly owned  insurance  company  subsidiary  of  the 
Company to insure the Company and its subsidiaries against certain risks unique to the operations of the 
Company  and  for  which  insurance  may  not  be  currently  available  or  economically  feasible  in  today’s 
insurance  marketplace.    First  Defiance  Risk  Management  pools  resources  with  several  other  similar 
insurance  company  subsidiaries  of  financial  institutions  to  spread  a  limited  amount  of  risk  among 
themselves. First Defiance Risk Management was incorporated on December 20, 2012. 

Financial Condition

Assets  at  December  31,  2016 totaled  $2.48 billion  compared  to  $2.30 billion  at  December  31, 
2015, an increase of $179.9 million or 7.8%. Cash and cash equivalents increased $19.2 million to $99.0
million at December 31, 2016 from $79.8 million at December 31, 2015. The increase in assets was due 
to an increase in loans receivable, net of undisbursed loan funds and deferred fees and costs, of $138.3
million and an increase in securities of $14.5 million.  These increases were funded by increases in total 
deposits of $145.5 million and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of $44.0 million as well as 
from cash and cash equivalents.

Securities

The  securities  portfolio  increased  $14.5 million  to  $251.2 million  at  December  31,  2016.  The 
2016 activity  in  the  portfolio  included  $71.3 million  of  purchases,  $882,000 of  amortization,,  $36.4 
million of principal pay-downs and maturities, and $14.9 million of securities being sold. There was a net 
decrease of $5.4 million in the market value of available-for-sale securities.  For additional information 
regarding First Defiance’s investment securities see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loans 

Loans  receivable,  net  of  undisbursed  loan  funds  and  deferred fees  and  costs,  increased  $138.3
million to $1.94 billion at December 31, 2016. For more details on the loan balances, see Note 7 – Loans 
Receivable in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The majority of First Defiance’s commercial real estate and commercial loans are to small and 
mid-sized businesses. The combined commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family real estate loan 
portfolios  totaled  $1.51 billion  and  $1.37 billion  at  December  31,  2016 and  2015,  respectively,  and 

- 36 - 

- 36 -

accounted for  approximately  74.2%  and  73.1%  of  First  Defiance’s  loan  portfolio  at  the  end  of  those 
respective periods. First Defiance believes it has been able to establish itself as a leader in its market area 
in the commercial and commercial real estate lending area by hiring experienced lenders and providing a 
high level of customer service to its commercial lending clients.

The 1-4 family residential portfolio totaled $207.6 million at December 31, 2016, compared with 
$205.3 million  at  the  end  of  2015.  At  the  end  of  2016,  those  loans  comprised  10.2%  of  the  total  loan 
portfolio, down from 11.0% at December 31, 2015. 

Construction  loans,  which  include  one-to-four  family  and  commercial  real  estate  properties, 
increased  to  $182.9 million  at  December  31,  2016  compared  to  $163.9 million  at  December  31,  2015.
These loans accounted for approximately 9.0% and 8.7% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2016 
and 2015, respectively.

Home  equity  and  home  improvement  loans  increased to $118.4 million at December 31, 2016,
from $117.0 million at the end of 2015. At the end of 2016, those loans comprised 5.8% of the total loan 
portfolio, down slightly from 6.3% at December 31, 2015. 

Consumer finance and mobile home loans were $16.7 million at December 31, 2016 up slightly
from $16.3 million at the end of 2015.  These loans accounted for approximately 0.8% and 0.9% of the 
total loan portfolio at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

In  order  to  properly  assess  the  collateral  dependent  loans  included  in  its  loan  portfolio,  the 
Company has established policies regarding the monitoring of the collateral underlying such loans.  The 
Company requires an appraisal that is less than one year old for all new collateral dependent real estate 
loans, and all renewed collateral dependent real estate loans where significant new money is extended.  
The  appraisal  process  is  handled  by  the  Credit  Department,  which  selects  the  appraiser  and  orders  the 
appraisal.  First Defiance’s loan policy prohibits the account officer from talking or communicating with 
the appraiser to insure that the appraiser is not influenced by the account officer in any way in making a 
determination of value. 

First  Federal  generally  does  not  require  updated  appraisals  for  performing  loans  unless 

significant new money is requested by the borrower. 

When  a  collateral  dependent  loan  is  downgraded  to  classified  status,  First  Federal  reviews  the 
most  current  appraisal  on  file  and  if  appropriate,  based  on  First  Federal’s  assessment  of  the  appraisal, 
such as age, market, etc. First Federal will discount the appraisal amount to a more appropriate current 
value  based  on  inputs  from  lenders  and  realtors.  This  amount  may  then  be  discounted  further  by  First 
Federal’s estimation of the selling costs.  In most instances, if the appraisal is more than twelve to fifteen 
months  old,  a  new  appraisal may  be  required.  Finally,  First  Federal  assesses  whether  there  is  any 
collateral short fall, taking into consideration guarantor support and liquidity, and determines if a charge 
off is necessary.  

All  loans  over  90  days  past  due  and/or  on  non-accrual  are  classified  as  non-performing  loans. 
Non-performing status automatically occurs in the month in which the 90-day delinquency occurs. When 
a collateral dependent loan moves to non-performing status, First Federal generally gets a new third party 
appraisal and charges the loan down appropriately based upon the new appraisal and an estimate of costs 
to  liquidate  the  collateral.  All properties that are moved into the Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) 
category are supported by current appraisals, and the OREO is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, 
which is determined based on appraised value less First Federal’s estimate of the liquidation costs.

First  Federal  does  not  adjust  any  appraisals  upward  without  written  documentation  of  this 
valuation change from the appraiser.  When setting reserves and charge offs on classified loans, appraisal 
values  may  be  discounted  downward  based  upon  First  Federal’s  experience  with  liquidating  similar 
properties.   

- 37 - 

- 37 -

 
Appraisals are received within approximately 60 days after they are requested.  The First Federal 
Loan  Loss  Reserve  Committee  reviews  the  amount  of  each  new  appraisal  and  makes  any  necessary 
charge off decisions at its meeting prior to the end of each quarter.

Any partially charged-off collateral dependent loans are considered non-performing, and as such, 
would need to show an extended period of time with satisfactory payment performance as well as cash 
flow coverage capability supported by current financial statements before First Federal will consider an 
upgrade  to  performing  status.      First  Federal  may  consider  moving  the  loan  to  accruing  status  after 
approximately six months of satisfactory payment performance.

For loans where First Federal determines that an updated appraisal is not necessary, other means 
are  used  to verify the value of the real estate, such as recent sales of similar properties on which First 
Federal had loans as well as calls to appraisers, brokers, realtors and investors.  First Federal monitors 
and  tracks  its  loan  to  value  quarterly  to  determine  accuracy  and  any  necessary  charge  offs.  Based  on 
these results, changes may occur in the processes used.

Loan  modifications  constitute  a  troubled  debt  restructuring  (“TDR”)  if  First  Federal  for 
economic  or  legal  reasons  related  to  the  borrower’s  financial  difficulties  grants  a  concession  to  the 
borrower  that  it  would  not  otherwise  consider.  For    loans    that    are    considered    TDRs,  First  Federal 
either  computes    the    present  value  of  expected  future  cash  flows  discounted  at  the  original  loan’s 
effective  interest  rate  or  it  may  measure  impairment  based  on  the  fair    value    of    the   collateral.   For 
those  loans  measured  for  impairment  utilizing  the  present  value  of  future  cash  flows method,  any 
discount  is  carried  as  a specific reserve  in  the  allowance  for  loan  and  lease  losses.    For  those  loans
measured  for  impairment  utilizing  the  fair  value  of  the  collateral,  any  shortfall  is  charged  off.    As  of 
December  31,  2016 and  December  31,  2015,  First  Federal  had  $10.5 million  and  $11.2 million, 
respectively, of loans that were still performing and which were classified as TDRs.

Allowance for Loan Losses 

The  allowance  for  loan  losses  represents  management’s  assessment  of  the  estimated  probable 
incurred credit losses in the loan portfolio at each balance sheet date. Management analyzes the adequacy 
of the allowance for loan losses regularly through reviews of the loan portfolio. Consideration is given to 
economic  conditions,  changes  in  interest  rates  and  the  effect  of  such  changes  on  collateral  values  and 
borrower’s  ability  to  pay,  changes  in  the  composition  of  the  loan  portfolio  and  trends  in  past  due  and 
non-performing loan balances. The allowance for loan losses is a material estimate that is susceptible to 
significant  fluctuation  and  is  established  through  a  provision  for  loan  losses  based  on  management’s 
evaluation  of  the  inherent  risk  in  the  loan  portfolio. In  addition  to  extensive  in-house  loan  monitoring 
procedures, the Company utilizes an outside party to conduct an independent loan review of commercial 
loan and commercial real estate loan relationships. The goal is to have approximately 55% to 60% of the 
portfolio reviewed annually.  This includes all relationships over $5.0 million with new exposure greater 
than  $2.0  million  and  a  sample  of  other  relationships  greater  than  $5.0  million;  loan  relationships 
between $1.0 million and $5.0 million with new exposure greater than $750,000 and a sample of other 
relationships between $1.0 million and $5.0 million; and a sample of relationships less than $1.0 million. 
Management utilizes the results of this outside loan review to assess the effectiveness of its internal loan 
grading system as well as to assist in the assessment of the overall adequacy of the allowance for loan 
losses associated with these types of loans.

The  allowance  for  loan  loss  is  made  up  of  two  basic  components.  The  first component  of  the 
allowance  for  loan  loss  is  the  specific  reserve  in  which  the  Company  sets  aside  reserves  based  on  the 
analysis  of  individual  impaired  credits.    In  establishing  specific  reserves,  the  Company  analyzes  all 
substandard, doubtful and loss graded loans quarterly and makes judgments about the risk of loss based 
on the cash flow of the borrower, the value of any collateral and the financial strength of any guarantors. 
If the loan is impaired and cash flow dependent, then a specific reserve is established for the discount on 
the net present value of expected future cash flows.  If the loan is impaired and collateral dependent, then 

- 38 - 

- 38 -

any  shortfall  is  usually  charged  off.    The  Company  also  considers  the  impacts  of  any  Small  Business 
Association  or  Farm  Service  Agency  guarantees. The  specific  reserve was  $809,000  at  December  31, 
2016 and $437,000 at December 31, 2015.  

The second component is a general reserve, which is used to record loan loss reserves for groups 
of  homogenous  loans  in  which  the  Company  estimates  the  losses  incurred  in  the  portfolio  based  on 
quantitative  and  qualitative  factors.    For  purposes  of  the  general  reserve  analysis,  the  loan  portfolio  is 
stratified into nine different loan pools based on loan type to allocate historic loss experience. The loss 
experience  factor  is  then  applied  to  the  non-impaired  loan  portfolio.    Beginning  June  30,  2015,  the 
Company  refined  the  methodology  to  its  allowance  for  loan  loss  calculation  pertaining  to  the  general 
reserve component for non-impaired loans.  There was no change to the calculation of the component for 
reserves  on  impaired  loans.    Within  the  general  reserve,  the  determination  of  the  historical  loss 
component  was  modified  from  using  a  three-year  average  annual  loss  rate  to  a  loss  migration 
measurement.  The loss migration measurement implemented June 30, 2015, utilized an average of four 
(4)  four-year  loss  migration  periods  for  each  loan  portfolio  segment  with  differentiation  between  loan 
risk  grades.  Prior  to  June  30,  2015,  the  approach  to  this  component  quantified  the  historical  loss  by 
calculating  a  rolling  twelve  quarter  average  annual  loss  rate  for  each  portfolio  segment,  without 
differentiation  between  loan  risk  grades.    Beginning  December  31,  2016  the  historical loss calculation 
was changed from using a an average of four (4) four-year loss migration periods to using an average of all 
four-year  loss  migration  periods  to  the  present  beginning  with  data  from  the  second  quarter  2011.
Management  believes  this  enhancement  is  consistent  with  the  rationale  of  the  previous  measurement  but 
provides a more precise calculation of historical losses by incorporating more data points for the average loss 
ratio and including periods that provide a more complete coverage of the full business cycle. Management 
believes that capturing the risk grade changes and cumulative losses over the life cycle of a loan more 
accurately  depicts  management’s  estimate  of  historical  losses  as  well  as  being  more  reflective  of  the 
ongoing  risks  in  the  loan  portfolio.  These  modifications  resulted  in  a  change  in the  general  reserves 
between the loan portfolio segments but did not have a material impact on the overall allowance for loan 
losses.

The  stratification  of  the  loan  portfolio  and  the  loss  migration  measurement  described  above 
resulted in a decrease to the quantitative general allowance to $8.7 million at December 31, 2016 from 
$9.8 million at December 31, 2015. 

In addition to the quantitative analysis, a qualitative analysis is performed each quarter to provide 
additional general reserves on the non-impaired loan portfolio for various factors.  The overall qualitative 
factors  are  based  on  nine  sub-factors.  The  nine  sub-factors  have  been  aggregated  into  three  qualitative 
factors: economic, environment and risk.   

ECONOMIC

1)

2)

 Changes in international, national and local economic business conditions and    

        developments, including the condition of various market segments. 

Changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans.  

ENVIRONMENT
3)
4)

Changes in the nature and volume in the loan portfolio. 
The existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level 

       of such concentrations. 

5)

6)
7)

Changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards     

       and collection, charge-off and recovery practices.

Changes in the quality and breadth of the loan review process.
Changes in the experience, ability and depth of lending management and staff. 

- 39 - 

- 39 -

RISK

8)

9)

Changes in the trends of the volume and severity of delinquent and classified      
        loans, and changes in the volume of non-accrual loans, trouble debt                    
        restructuring, and other loan modifications. 

Changes in the political and regulatory environment. 

The  qualitative  analysis  at  December  31,  2016 indicated  a  general  reserve  of  $16.4 million 
compared with  $15.2 million  at  December  31,  2015. Management  reviews  the  overall  economic, 
environmental  and  risk  factors  quarterly  and  determines  appropriate  adjustments  to  these  sub-factors 
based on that review.   

The economic factors for all loan segments were increased in 2016 due to the uncertain global 
economic conditions and related market volatility which presented higher than normal risks to the U.S. 
economy.   

The environmental factors have increased in 2016 in the commercial real estate and commercial 
loan segments due to the significant growth in balances achieved amidst highly competitive conditions on 
pricing and terms and balances generated in our metro markets. There was also a continued increase in 
the volume of loans greater than $10 million and an increase in loans to our most significant borrowers.
The environmental factors for residential, consumer, home equity and construction loans were decreased 
during 2016 due to the stability and maturity of the lending staff.  

The  risk  factors  in  all  loan  segments except  consumer  were  decreased  in  2016  due  to the 
continued decrease in the level of non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings and OREO since December 
31, 2015. 

 First  Defiance’s  general  reserve  percentages  for  main  loan  segments  not otherwise  classified 

ranged from 0.50% for construction loans to 1.71% for home equity and improvement loans. 

As a result of the quantitative and qualitative analysis, along with the change in specific reserves, 
the  Company’s  provision  for  loan  losses for  2016 was  $283,000 compared  to  $136,000 for  2015.  The 
allowance  for  loan losses was $25.9 million at December 31, 2016 and $25.4 million at December 31, 
2015 and  represented  1.33%  and  1.41%  of  loans,  net  of  undisbursed  loan  funds  and  deferred  fees  and 
costs, respectively. The decrease in the quantitative reserves and the lower level of charge offs was offset 
by the increase in the qualitative reserve and specific reserve. The provision was offset by charge offs of 
$1.4 million and recoveries of $1.6 million resulting in an increase to the overall allowance for loan loss 
of  $502,000.
In  management’s  opinion,  the  overall  allowance  for  loan  losses  of  $25.9  million  as  of 
December 31, 2016 is adequate.

Management  also  assesses  the  value  of  OREO as  of  the  end  of  each  accounting  period  and 
recognizes write-downs to the value of that real estate in the income statement if conditions dictate. In 
2016, First Defiance recorded OREO write-downs that totaled $74,000. These amounts were included in 
other  non-interest  expense.  Management  believes  that  the  values  recorded  at  December  31,  2016 for 
OREO and repossessed assets represent the realizable value of such assets.

Total classified loans decreased significantly to $27.5 million at December 31, 2016, compared 

to $49.1 million at December 31, 2015. 

First  Defiance’s  ratio  of  allowance  for  loan  losses  to  non-performing  loans  was  180.4%  at 
December  31,  2016 compared  with  156.1%  at  December  31,  2015.  Management  monitors  collateral 
values of all loans included on the watch list that are collateral dependent and believes that allowances 
for those loans at December 31, 2016 are appropriate.

- 40 - 

- 40 -

 
At  December  31,  2016,  First  Defiance  had  total  non-performing  assets  of  $14.8 million, 
compared to $17.6 million at December 31, 2015. Non-performing assets include loans that are 90 days 
past due, real estate owned and other assets held for sale.  

The decrease in non-performing assets between December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is in 
commercial  loans  and  real  estate  owned.  The  balance  of  commercial  non-performing  loans  was  $2.1 
million  lower at  December  31,  2016 compared  to  December  31,  2015. The  balance  of  OREO was 
$866,000 lower at December 31, 2016 compared to December 31, 2015.   

Non-performing  loans  in  the  single-family  residential,  commercial  real  estate and  commercial 
loan categories represent 1.41%, 0.92% and 0.21% of the total loans in those categories respectively at 
December  31,  2016 compared  to  1.27%,  1.04%  and  0.73%  respectively  for  the  same  categories  at 
December 31, 2015. Management believes that the current allowance for loan losses is appropriate and 
that the provision for loan losses recorded in 2016 is consistent with both charge-off experience and the 
risk inherent in the overall credits in the portfolio.

First Federal’s Asset Review Committee meets monthly to review the status of work-out strategies 
for  all  criticized  relationships,  which  include  all  non-accrual  loans.  Based  on  such  factors  as  anticipated 
collateral values in liquidation scenarios, cash flow projections, assessment of net worth of guarantors and 
all  other  factors  which  may  mitigate  risk  of  loss,  the  Asset  Review  Committee  makes  recommendations 
regarding  proposed  charge-offs  which  are  approved  by  the  Senior  Loan  Committee  or  the  Loan  Loss 
Reserve Committee. 

For  the  twelve  months  ended  and  as  of  December  31,  2016,  commercial  real  estate,  which 
represented  51.15%  of  total  loans,  accounted  for  a  net  recovery  of  379.45%  and  66.85%  of  nonaccrual 
loans,  and  commercial  loans,  which  represented  23.01%  of  total  loans,  accounted  for  127.85%  of  net 
charge offs and 7.02% of nonaccrual loans.  For the twelve months ended and as of December 31, 2015,
commercial real estate, which represented 50.71% of total loans, accounted for a net recovery of 93.33% 
and  60.56%  of  nonaccrual  loans,  and  commercial  loans,  which  represented  22.42%  of  total  loans, 
accounted for 54.79% of net recoveries and 18.93% of nonaccrual loans.   

Table 1 – Net Charge-offs and Non-accruals by Loan Type

For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2016

As of December 31, 2016

Net

Charge-offs

(Recoveries)

(In Thousands)

$

184

-

(831)

280

30

118

% of Total Net

Charge-offs

(Recoveries)

84.02%

0.00%

(379.45)%

127.85%

13.70%

53.88%

Nonaccrual

% of Total Non-

Loans

Accrual Loans

(In Thousands)

$     

2,928

-

9,592

1,007

91

730

20.41%

0.00%

66.85%

7.02%

0.63%

5.09%

Residential

Construction 

Commercial real estate

Commercial

Consumer finance

Home equity and improvement

Total 

$                  (219)

(100.00)%

$          14,348

100.00%

- 41 - 

- 41 -

For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2015

As of December 31, 2015

Net

Charge-offs

(In Thousands)

$                    69 

-

(448)

(263) 

-

162

% of Total Net

Charge-offs

Nonaccrual

% of Total Non-

Loans

Accrual Loans

14.38%

0.00%

(93.33)%

(54.79)%

0.00%

33.74%

(In Thousands)

$             2,610

-

9,848 

3,078

36 

689 

16.05%

0.00%

60.56%

18.93%

0.22%

4.24%

Residential

Construction 

Commercial real estate

Commercial

Consumer finance

Home equity and improvement

Total 

$                  (480)

(100.00)%

$           16,261

100.00%

The  following  table  sets  forth  information  concerning  the  allocation  of  First  Defiance’s 

allowance for loan losses by loan categories at December 31, 2016 and 2015. 

Table 2 – Allowance for Loan Loss Allocation by Loan Category 

1-4 family residential
Multi-family  residential real 

estate 

Commercial real estate
Construction
Commercial loans 

Home equity and improvement loans
Consumer loans

December 31, 2016

December 31, 2015

Percent of
total loans
by category Amount

Percent of
total loans
by category

(Dollars in Thousands)
10.2% $ 3,212

9.7
41.5
9.0
23.0
5.8
0.8

2,151
11,772
         517
5,192
2,270
171
100.0% $25,382

11.0%

9.0
41.8
8.7
22.4
6.2
0.9
100.0%

Amount

$ 2,627

2,228
10,625
450
7,361
2,386
207
$25,884

Loans Acquired with Impairment

Certain loans acquired had evidence that the credit quality of the loan had deteriorated since its 
origination and, in management’s assessment at the acquisition date, it was probable that First Defiance 
would be unable to collect all contractually required payments due. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 
310 Subtopic 30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, these loans were 
recorded based on management’s estimate of the fair value of the loans. 

As of December 31, 2016, the total contractual receivable for those loans was $66,000 and the 

recorded value was $11,000.

High Loan-to-Value Mortgage Loans 

The  majority  of  First  Defiance’s mortgage  loans  are collateralized  by  one-to-four-family 
residential real estate, have loan-to-value ratios of 80% or less, and are made to borrowers in good credit 
standing.  First  Federal  usually  requires  residential  mortgage  loan  borrowers  whose  loan-to-value  is
greater than 80% to purchase private mortgage insurance (“PMI”). Management also periodically reviews 
and monitors the financial viability of its PMI providers.

First Federal originates and retains a limited number of residential mortgage loans with loan-to-
value  ratios  that  exceed  80%  where  PMI  is  not  required  if  the  borrower  possesses  other  demonstrable 
strengths. The loan-to-value ratios on these loans are generally limited to 85% and exceptions must be 
approved  by  First  Federal’s  senior  loan  committee.  Management  monitors  the  balance  of  one-to-four 

- 42 - 

- 42 -

family residential loans, including home equity loans and committed lines of credit that exceed certain 
loan  to  value  standards  (90%  for  owner  occupied  residences,  85%  for  non-owner  occupied  residences 
and one-to-four family construction loans, 75% for developed land and 65% for raw land). Total loans 
that  exceed  those  standards  described  above  at  December  31,  2016 totaled  $42.8 million,  compared  to 
$46.3 million at December 31, 2015. These loans are generally paying as agreed.

First  Defiance  does  not  make  interest-only  first-mortgage  residential  loans,  nor  does  it  have 

residential mortgage loan products or other consumer products that allow negative amortization. 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill  was  $61.8  million  at  December  31,  2016  and  December  31,  2015.  Core  deposit 
intangibles and other intangible assets decreased to $1.3 million at December 31, 2016 compared to $1.9
million  at  December  31,  2015.    During  2016,  changes  to  the  core  deposit  intangibles  and  other 
intangibles were due to the recognition of $535,000 of amortization expense.  No impairment of goodwill 
was recorded in 2016 or 2015.  

Deposits

Total deposits at December 31, 2016 were $1.98 billion compared to $1.84 billion at December 
31, 2015, an increase of $145.5 million or 7.9%. Non-interest bearing checking accounts grew by $67.0
million, interest bearing checking accounts and money markets grew by $49.5 million, savings grew by 
$23.7 million and retail certificates of deposit grew by $5.3 million. Management can utilize the national 
market for certificates of deposit to supplement its funding needs if necessary. For more details on the 
deposit balances in general see Note 11 – Deposits in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  

Borrowings 

FHLB  advances  totaled  $103.9 million  at  December  31,  2016 compared  to  $59.9 million  at 
December 31, 2015. The balance at the end of 2016 includes $5.0 million of convertible advances with a 
rate of 2.35%. This advance is callable by the FHLB, at which point it would convert to a three-month 
LIBOR  advance  if  not  paid  off.  This advance  has  a final  maturity  date  in  2018.  In  addition,  First 
Defiance has ten fixed-rate advances totaling $92.0 million with rates ranging from 0.99% to 2.16% and 
one amortizing advance totaling $6.9 million with a rate of 1.78%.   

At  December  31,  2016,  First  Defiance  also  had  $31.8  million  of  securities  that  were  sold  with 

agreements to repurchase, compared to $57.2 million at December 31, 2015.  

Equity

Total stockholders’ equity increased $12.8 million to $293.0 million at December 31, 2016. This 
increase is a result of net income of $28.8 million and capital of $714,000 from the exercise of 37,970 net 
shares under stock option plans, which was partially offset by repurchasing 167,868 shares of common 
stock  totaling  $6.3 million  and  $7.9 million  of  common  stock  dividends  being  paid  in  2016.    In  2015,
225,808 shares  were  repurchased,  resulting  in  an  $8.4  million  decrease  in  stockholders’  equity,  and 
73,800 net  shares  were  exercised  under  stock  option  plans  resulting  in  a  $1.5  million increase  in 
stockholder’s equity.  

- 43 - 

- 43 -

Results of Operations 

Summary

First  Defiance  reported  net  income  of  $28.8 million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2016
compared  to  $26.4 million and  $24.3 million  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2015 and  2014,
respectively.  On a diluted per common share basis, First Defiance earned $3.19 in 2016, $2.82 in 2015
and $2.44 in 2014.  

Net Interest Income 

First Defiance’s net interest income is determined by its interest rate spread (i.e. the difference 
between the yields on its interest-earning assets and the rates paid on its interest-bearing liabilities) and 
the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

Net interest income was $78.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $74.1
million  and  $69.7 million  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2015 and  2014,  respectively.  The  tax-
equivalent  net  interest  margin  was  3.74%,  3.81%  and  3.68%  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2016,
2015 and  2014,  respectively.  The  margin  decreased  7  basis  points between  2015 and  2016.  Interest-
earning  asset  yields  decreased  2 basis  points  (to  4.13%  in  2016 from  4.15%  in  2015)  and  the cost  of 
interest  bearing  liabilities  between the  two  periods  increased  8 basis  points  (to  0.52%  in  2016 from 
0.44% in 2015).

Total  interest  income  increased  by  $6.6 million  or  8.1%  to  $87.4 million  for  the  year  ended 
December 31, 2016 from $80.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in interest 
income  was  due  to  the  significant increase  in  loan  volume.    The  average  balance  of  loans  receivable 
increased $166.0 million to $1.85 billion at December 31, 2016 from $1.69 billion at December 31, 2015. 
Interest income from loans increased to $80.2 million for 2016 compared to $73.3 million in 2015, which 
represents an increase of 9.4%.

During the same period, the average balance of investment securities decreased to $233.4 million 
for  2016 from  $239.9 million  for  the year ended December 31, 2015. Interest income from investment 
securities  decreased  to  $6.2 million  in  2016 compared  to  $6.8  million  in  2015,  which  represents  a 
decrease of 7.7%. The overall duration of investments decreased to 3.6 years at December 31, 2016 from
4.2 years at December 31, 2015. 

Interest expense increased by $1.6 million in 2016 compared to 2015, to $8.4 million from $6.8
million.  This  increase  was  mainly  due  to  an eight basis  point  increase in  the  average  cost  of  interest-
bearing  liabilities  in  2016  and  a  $110.2  million  increase  in  the  average  balance  of  interest-bearing 
liabilities. The  average  balance  of  interest  bearing  deposits  increased  $64.3  million  to  $1.46  billion  at 
December 31, 2016 from $1.40 billion at December 31, 2015.  Interest expense related to interest-bearing 
deposits  was  $6.3 million  in 2016  compared  to  $5.3 million  in  2015.    Interest  expenses  on  FHLB 
advances  and  other  interest-bearing  funding  sources  were  $1.3  million and  $138,000  respectively,  in 
2016 and $675,000 and $152,000 respectively in 2015.  The increase in FHLB advance expense was due 
to a $47.7 million increase in the average balance of FHLB advances to $85.9 million at December 31, 
2016  compared  to  $38.1  million  at  December  31,  2015. Interest  expense  recognized  by  the  Company 
related to subordinated debentures was $753,000 in 2016 and $613,000 in 2015 due to rising rates. 

Total  interest  income  increased  by  $4.6 million  or  6.0%  to  $80.8 million  for  the  year  ended 
December 31, 2015 from $76.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in interest 
income was due to the significant increase in loan volume and deploying lower yielding interest bearing 
deposit balances into higher yielding loans.  The average balance of interest bearing deposits decreased 
to  $59.4  million  from  $134.1  million  at  December  31,  2014.    Interest  income  from  loans  increased  to 
$73.3 million for 2015 compared to $68.7 million in 2014, which represents an increase of 6.8%.

- 44 - 

- 44 -

During the same period, the average balance of investment securities increased to $239.9 million 
for  2015 from  $223.5 million  for  the year ended December 31, 2014. Interest income from investment 
securities  increased  to  $6.8  million  in  2015  compared  to  $6.6  million  in  2014,  which  represents  an 
increase of 3.0%. The overall duration of investments decreased to 4.2 years at December 31, 2015 from 
4.9 years at December 31, 2014. 

Interest  expense  increased  by  $222,000 in  2015 compared  to  2014,  to  $6.8 million  from  $6.6
million. This increase was mainly due to a one basis point increase in the average cost of interest-bearing 
liabilities  in  2015.  Interest  expense  related  to  interest-bearing  deposits  was  $5.3 million  in  2015  and 
2014.    Expenses  on  FHLB  advances  and  other  interest-bearing  funding  sources  were  $675,000  and 
$152,000 respectively  in  2015 and  $528,000 and  $161,000  respectively  in  2014.    Interest  expense 
recognized by the Company related to subordinated debentures was $613,000 in 2015 and $587,000 in 
2014 due to rising rates. 

- 45 - 

- 45 -

The following table shows an analysis of net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis for the years 

ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014: 

Table 3 – Net Interest Margin

Year Ended December 31

Average 
Balance

2016
Interest 
(1)

Yield/ 
Rate (2)

Average 
Balance

(In Thousands)
2015
Interest 
(1)

Yield/ 
Rate 

Average 
Balance

2014
Interest 
(1)

Yield/
Rate

$   1,853,419
233,407
67,420
13,800

$80,423
7,871
367
552

4.34% $   1,687,413
239,852
3.48%
59,410
0.54%
13,802
4.00%

$73,544
8,476
169
552

4.36% $   1,574,753
223,534
3.64%
134,114
0.27%
14,677
4.00%

$68,828
8,227
349
642

4.37%
3.79%
0.26%
4.37%

2,168,046

89,213

4.13%

2,000,477

82,741

4.15%

1,947,078

78,046

4.01%

Interest-Earning Assets:
Loans receivable (5)
Securities (6)
Interest-earning deposits
FHLB stock
Total interest-earning
assets
Non-interest-earning
assets

229,393

Total Assets

$2,397,439

222,389

$2,222,866

215,390

$2,162,468

Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits
FHLB advances
Subordinated debentures
Other borrowings
Total interest-bearing

liabilities

Non-interest bearing
demand deposits
Total including non-
interest- bearing 
demand deposits
Other non-interest

liabilities 

Total Liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and 
stockholders’ equity
Net interest income;

$    1,463,890
85,856
36,141
52,826

$6,261
1,288
753
138

0.43% $    1,399,619
38,134
1.50%
36,129
2.09%
54,619
0.26%

$5,341
675
613
152

0.38% $    1,399,507
21,995
1.77%
36,131
1.70%
54,524
0.28%

$5,283
528
587
161

0.38%
2.40%
1.62%
0.30%

1,638,713

8,440

0.52%

1,528,501

6,781

0.44%

1,512,157

6,559

0.43%

441,731

−

388,257

−

350,677

−

2,080,444

8,440

0.41%

1,916,758

6,781

0.35%

1,862,834

6,559

0.35%

31,361
2,111,805
285,634

28,463
1,945,221
277,645

23,097
1,885,931
276,537

$ 2,397,439

$ 2,222,866

$ 2,162,468

interest  rate spread (3)

$80,773

3.61%

$75,960

3.71%

$71,487

3.57%

Net interest margin (4)
Average interest-earning

assets to average interest- 
bearing liabilities

3.74%

132.3%

3.81%

130.9%

3.68%

128.8%

(1) 

(2)

(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

Interest on certain tax exempt loans (amounting to $383,000, $368,000 and $271,000 in 2016, 2015 and 2014 respectively) and tax-exempt 
securities  ($3.0  million,  $3.2  million  and  $3.1 million  in  2016,  2015,  and  2014)  is  not  taxable for Federal income tax purposes. The average 
balance of such loans was $11.8 million, $10.7 million and $7.8 million in 2016, 2015, and 2014 while the average balance of such securities was 
$83.4 million, $86.0 million and $82.2 million in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. In order to compare the tax-exempt yields on these assets to 
taxable yields, the interest earned on these assets is adjusted to a pre-tax equivalent amount based on the marginal corporate federal income tax 
rate of 35%.

At December 31, 2016, the yields earned and rates paid were as follows: loans receivable, 4.20%; securities, 3.08%; FHLB stock,4.00%; total 
interest-earning  assets,    4.07%;  deposits,  0.26%;  FHLB  advances,  1.42%;  other  borrowings,  0.22%,  subordinated  debentures,  2.39%;  total 
including non- interest-bearing liabilities, 0.35%; and interest rate spread, 3.72%.

Interest rate spread is the difference in the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets excluding average unrealized gains/losses. 
For the purpose of the computation for loans, nonaccrual loans are included in the average loans outstanding.
Securities yield = annualized interest income divided by the average balance of securities, excluding average unrealized gains/losses.

- 46 - 

- 46 -

Interest-Earning Assets
Loans
Securities
Interest-earning
deposits
FHLB stock
Total interest-earning

assets

Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Deposits
FHLB advances
Subordinated Debentures
Notes Payable
Total interest- bearing

The following table describes the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume of 
interest-related  assets  and  liabilities  have  affected  First  Defiance’s  tax-equivalent  interest  income  and 
interest  expense  during  the  periods  indicated.  For  each  category  of  interest-earning  assets  and  interest-
bearing  liabilities,  information  is  provided  on  changes  attributable  to  (i)  changes  in  volume  (change  in 
volume multiplied by prior year rate), (ii) change in rate (change in rate multiplied by prior year volume), 
and (iii) total change in rate and volume. The combined effect of changes in both rate and volume has been 
allocated proportionately to the change due to rate and the change due to volume.

Table 4 – Changes in Interest Rates and Volumes

Year Ended December 31
(In Thousands)

Increase 
(decrease)
due to
rate

2016 vs. 2015
Increase 
(decrease)
due to
volume

Total 
increase
(decrease)

Increase 
(decrease)
due to
rate

2015 vs. 2014
Increase 
(decrease)
due to
volume

Total 
increase
(decrease)

$

(326)
(381)

$

7,205
(224)

$

6,879
(605)

$

(195)
(336)

$

4,911
585

$

4,716
249

173
-

25
-

198
-

30
(53)

(210)
(37)

(180)
(90)

$

(534)

$

7,006

$

6,472

$

(554)

$

5,249

$

4,695

$

667
(117)
140
(9)

$

253
730
-
(5)

$

$

$

920
613
140
(14)

$

58
(165)
26
(9)

$

-
312
-
-

1,659

$

(90)

$

312

4,813

$

$

$

58
147
26
(9)

222

4,473

liabilities

$

681

$

978

Increase (decrease) in net interest income

Provision  for  Loan  Losses  – First  Defiance’s  provision  for  loan  losses  was  $283,000 for  the 
year  ended  December  31,  2016 compared  to  $136,000 for  December  31,  2015 and  $1.1 million  for 
December 31, 2014. 

Provisions for loan losses are charged to earnings to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a 
level  deemed  appropriate  by  management  to  absorb  probable  losses  incurred  in  the  loan  portfolio.  
Factors  considered  by  management  include  identifiable risk in the portfolios, historical experience, the 
volume and type of lending conducted by First Defiance, the amount of non-performing loans (including 
loans  which meet  the  FASB  ASC  Topic  310  definition  of  impaired),  the  amount  of  loans  graded  by 
management as substandard, doubtful, or loss, general economic conditions (particularly as they relate to 
First  Defiance’s  market  areas);  and  other  factors  related  to  the  collectability  of  First  Defiance’s  loan 
portfolio. See also Allowance for Loan Losses in Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 7 to 
the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Noninterest Income – Noninterest income increased by $2.2 million or 7.0% in 2016 to $34.0
million  from  $31.8 million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2015.    That  followed  an increase  of 
$162,000 or 0.5% in 2015 from $31.6 million in 2014. 

Service fees and other charges increased to $10.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016
from  $10.8 million  for  2015  and  increased  from  $10.3  million  for  2014. The  increase  in  noninterest 
income  in  2016  and  2015 from  2014 is  due  to  new  fee  structures  and  product  redesigns  that  were 
implemented in the third quarter of 2014.   

- 47 - 

- 47 -

First  Federal’s  overdraft  privilege  program  generally  provides  for  the  automatic  payment  of 
modest  overdraft  limits  on  all  accounts  deemed  to  be  in  good  standing  when  the  account  is  accessed 
using paper-based check processing, a teller withdrawal, a point-of-sale terminal, an ACH transaction, an 
online  banking  or  voice-response  transfer,  or  an  ATM.  To  be  in  good  standing,  an  account  must  be 
brought  to  a  positive  balance  within  a  30-day  period  and  have  not  excessively  used  the  overdraft 
privilege program. Overdraft limits are established for all customers without discrimination using a risk 
assessment  approach  for  each  account  classification.  The  approach  includes  a  systematic  review  and 
evaluation  of  the  normal  deposit  flows  made  to each account classification to establish reasonable and 
prudent  negative  balance  limits  that  would  be  routinely  repaid  by  normal,  expected  and  reoccurring 
deposits.  The  risk  assessment  by  portfolio  approach  assumes  a  minimal  degree  of  undetermined  credit 
risk associated with unidentified individual accounts that are overdrawn for 30 or more days. Consumer 
accounts overdrawn for more than 60 days are automatically charged off. Fees are charged as a one-time 
fee per occurrence, up to five charges per day, and the fee charged for an item that is paid is equal to the 
fee charged for a non-sufficient fund item that is returned. 

Overdrawn  balances,  net  of  allowance  for  losses,  are  reflected  as  loans  on  First  Defiance’s 
balance  sheet.  The  fees  charged  for  this  service  are  established  based  both on the return of processing 
costs  plus  a  profit,  and  on  the  level  of  fees  charged  by  competitors  in  the  Company’s  market  area  for 
similar  services.  These fees are considered to be compensation for providing a service to the customer 
and therefore deemed to be noninterest income rather than interest income. Fee income recorded for the 
years ending December 31, 2016 and 2015 related to the overdraft privilege product, net of adjustments 
to the allowance for uncollectible overdrafts, were $2.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively. Accounts 
charged off are included in noninterest expense.  The allowance for uncollectible overdrafts was $14,000
at December 31, 2016 and $18,000 at December 31, 2015. 

Noninterest income also includes gains, losses and impairment on investment securities. In 2016,
First  Defiance  realized  a  $509,000  gain on sale of securities.  In 2015, a $22,000 gain was recognized
compared to a $932,000 net gain in 2014.  

Mortgage  banking  income  includes  gains  from  the  sale  of  mortgage  loans,  fees  for  servicing 
mortgage  loans  for  others, an  offset  for  amortization  of  mortgage  servicing rights, and adjustments for 
impairment  in  the  value  of  mortgage  servicing  rights.  Mortgage  banking  income  totaled  $7.3 million, 
$6.7 million and $5.6 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The $557,000 increase in 2016 from 
2015 is  attributable  to  a  $747,000 increase  in  the  gain  on  sale  of  loans,  along  with a  $57,000 positive
change  in  servicing  revenue.  These  were  partially  offset  by  an increase  of  $104,000 in  mortgage 
servicing  rights  amortization  expense along  with a  $143,000 negative change  in  the  valuation 
adjustments  on  mortgage  servicing  rights.  First  Defiance  originated  $263.7 million  of  residential 
mortgages  for  sale  into  the  secondary  market  in  2016 compared with  $213.4 million  in  2015.    The 
balance of the mortgage servicing right valuation allowance stands at $522,000 at the end of 2016.  The 
$1.1 million increase in 2015 from 2014 is attributable to a $1.2 million increase in the gain on sale of 
loans, along with a $150,000 positive change in the valuation adjustments on mortgage servicing rights. 
These were partially offset by an increase of $219,000 in mortgage servicing rights amortization expense. 
 The positive valuation adjustment is a reflection of the increase in the fair value of certain sectors of the 
Company’s portfolio of mortgage servicing rights.  First Defiance originated $213.4 million of residential 
mortgages for sale into the secondary market in 2015 compared with $153.8 million in 2014.   See Note 8 
to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

  Gains  on  the  sale  of  non-mortgages,  which  include  SBA  and  FSA  loans,  totaled  $753,000  in 
2016 compared to $824,000 in 2015 and $181,000 in 2014.  The Company has built up its pipeline of 
eligible small business administration loans since 2014 and increased its selling efforts in 2015 and 2016. 

Insurance commission income increased $365,000 or 3.6% to $10.4 million in 2016 from $10.1
million in 2015 mainly due to an increase in general production in the property and casualty and group 
employee benefits lines of business.  Insurance commission income increased $217,000 or 2.2% to $10.1
million in 2015 from $9.9 million in 2014.   

- 48 - 

- 48 -

 
 
Income from bank owned life insurance increased slightly to $909,000 in 2016 from $895,000 in 
2015, but decreased from $1.8 million in 2014. The decrease in 2015 from 2014 is the result of a tax-
free benefit from a bank-owned life insurance policy due to a death claim in 2014.   

Other income increased $479,000 to $1.5 million in 2016 compared to $1.1 million in 2015 and 
$1.8  million in  2014.    The  $479,000  increase  in  2016  from  2015  is  due  to  a  $231,000  increase  in  the 
value of the assets of the Company’s deferred compensation plan as well as a $139,000 increase in the 
gain on sale of other real estate owned.   The $708,000 decrease in 2015 from 2014 is mainly the result of 
a  $498,000  tax-free  gain  realized  in  2014  through  the  Company’s  deferred  compensation  plan  trust 
attributable to the aforementioned death claim.   

Noninterest Expense – Total noninterest expense for 2016 was $71.1 million compared to $67.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and $66.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. 

Compensation and benefits increased $2.4 million or 6.4% to $40.2 million from $37.8 million in 
2015.    The  increase  is  mainly  related  to  merit  increases  and  new  staff  for  growth  strategies,  higher 
incentive  compensation  accruals  and  higher  medical  insurance  costs.  Other  non-interest  expenses 
increased  $436,000  or  2.8%  to  $16.0 million  in  2016  from  $15.5 million  in  2015  mainly  due  to 
acquisition related costs for the pending acquisition of Commercial Bancshares, Inc. and $300,000 for a 
termination  of  a  lease partially  offset  by a  decrease  in  the  amortization  of  intangibles  of  $164,000.
Occupancy expense increased $221,000, to $7.4 million in 2016 compared to $7.2 million in 2015 and 
data  processing  expense  increased  $284,000  to  $6.4  million  in  2016  from  $6.1  million  in  2015.  These 
increases were partially offset by decreases in FDIC insurance premiums of $155,000.  

Compensation and benefits increased $2.2 million or 6.3% in 2015 to $37.8 million from $35.5
million in 2014. The increase in compensation and benefits is due to merit increases, staff additions for 
growth and  an  increase  in  incentive  compensation  as  a  direct  reflection  of  the  improved  financial 
performance of the Company.  Occupancy expense increased $514,000 or 7.7% to $7.2 million in 2015, 
from $6.7 million in 2014.  The increase is attributable to projects relating to preventative maintenance 
and  upkeep  of  the  Company’s  branch  network.    Other  non-interest  expenses decreased  $1.7 million  or 
10.1% to $15.5 million in 2015 from $17.3 million in 2014. The decrease is due to $786,000 of costs in 
2014 associated with the termination of First Federal’s merger agreement with First Community Bank.

Income Taxes – Income taxes totaled $12.8 million in 2016 compared to $11.4 million in 2015
and  $9.2 million  in  2014.  The  effective  tax  rates  for  those  years  were  30.7%,  30.2%,  and  27.4%, 
respectively.  The  tax  rate  is  lower than the statutory 35% tax rate for the Company mainly because of 
investments  in  tax-exempt  securities.  The  earnings  on  tax-exempt  securities  are  not  subject  to  federal 
income  tax.  See  Note  18  –  Income  Taxes  in  the  Notes  to  the  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  for 
further details.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial  institutions  such  as  First  Defiance  generate  income  primarily  through  lending  and 
investing  activities.  The  risk  of  loss  from  lending  and  investing  activities  includes  the  possibility  that 
losses  may  occur  from  the  failure  of  another  party  to  perform  according  to  the  terms  of  the  loan  or 
investment agreement. This possibility is known as credit risk.

Lending  or  investing  activities that  concentrate  assets  in  a  way  that  exposes  the  Company  to  a 
material loss from any single occurrence or group of occurrences increases credit risk. Diversifying loans 
and  investments  to  prevent  concentrations  of  risks  is  one  way  a  financial  institution can  reduce  potential 
losses due to credit risk. Examples of asset concentrations would include multiple loans made to a single 
borrower and loans of inappropriate size relative to the total capitalization of the institution. Management 
believes adherence to its loan and investment policies allows it to control its exposure to concentrations of 
credit  risk  at  acceptable  levels.  First  Defiance’s  loan  portfolio  is  concentrated  geographically  in  its 
northwest Ohio, northeast Indiana, central Ohio and southeast Michigan market areas. Management has also 

- 49 - 

- 49 -

      
 
identified  lending  for  income-generating  rental  properties  as  an  industry  concentration.  Total  loans  for 
income- generating property totaled $687.5 million at December 31, 2016, which represents 33.8% of the 
Company’s  loan  portfolio.  Management  believes  it  has  the  skill  and  experience  to  manage  any  risks 
associated  with  this  type  of  lending.  Loans  in  this  category  are  generally  paying  as  agreed  without  any 
unusual or unexpected levels of delinquency. The delinquency rate in this category, which is any loan 30 
days or more past due, was 0.04% at December 31, 2016. There are no other industry concentrations that 
exceed 10% of the Company’s loan portfolio.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s primary source of liquidity is its core deposit base, raised through First Federal’s 
branch  network,  along  with  wholesale  sources  of  funding  and  its  capital  base.  These  funds,  along  with 
investment securities, provide the ability to meet the needs of depositors while funding new loan demand 
and existing commitments.

Cash  generated  from  operating  activities  was  $27.0 million,  $30.7  million  and  $30.1 million  in 
2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by or used in 
operations  during  the  periods  presented  consist  primarily  of  proceeds  from  the  sale  of  loans  (less  the 
origination  of  loans  held  for  sale),  the  provision  for  loan  losses,  depreciation  expense,  the  origination, 
amortization and impairment of mortgage servicing rights and increases and decreases in other assets and 
liabilities.

The  primary  investing  activity  of  First  Defiance  is  lending,  which  is  funded  with  cash  provided 
from operating and financing activities, as well as proceeds from payment on existing loans and proceeds 
from maturities of investment securities.  In 2016 and 2014, the Company purchased $822,000 and $16.6
million, respectively, in portfolio residential home loans. There were no purchases in 2015.

In considering the more typical investing activities, during 2016, $36.4 million and $14.9 million
was  generated  from  the  combination  of  maturity or pay-downs  and  the  sale  or  call  of  available-for-sale 
investment securities, respectively, and $163.0 million was used by an increase in loans while $71.3 million 
was  used  to  purchase  available-for-sale  investment  securities.   During  2015, $31.2 million  and  $426,000
was  generated  from  the  combination  of  maturity or pay-downs  and  the  sale  or  call  of  available-for-sale 
investment securities, respectively, and $177.0 million was used by an increase in loans while $30.5 million 
was used to purchase available-for-sale investment securities. During 2014, $20.4 million and $14.9 million 
was  generated  from  the  combination  of  maturity or pay-downs  and  the  sale  or  call of  available-for-sale 
investment securities, respectively, and $73.2 million was used by an increase in loans while $70.1 million 
was used to purchase available-for-sale investment securities.   

Principal financing activities include the gathering of deposits, the utilization of FHLB advances, 
and the sale of securities under agreements to repurchase such securities and borrowings from other banks. 
In 2016,  total  deposits  increased  by  $145.5 million.    Securities  sold  under  repurchase  arrangements 
decreased  by  $25.4 million in  2016.      Also  in  2016,  the  Company  paid  $7.9  million  in  common  stock 
dividends coupled with paying $6.3 million in common stock repurchases. In 2015, total deposits increased 
by $75.7 million.  Securities sold under repurchase arrangements increased by $2.4 million in 2015.   Also 
in 2015, the Company paid $7.2 million in common stock dividends coupled with paying $8.4 million in 
In 2014,  total  deposits  increased  by  $25.8  million.    Securities  sold  under 
common  stock  repurchases.
repurchase arrangements increased by $2.8 million in 2014.   Also in 2014, the Company paid $5.9 million 
in  common  stock  dividends  coupled  with  paying  $15.5  million  in  common  stock  repurchases. For 
additional information about cash flows from First Defiance’s operating, investing and financing activities, 
see the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

At  December  31,  2016,  First  Defiance  had  the  following  commitments  to  fund  deposit, advance, 

borrowing obligations and post-retirement benefits:

- 50 - 

- 50 -

Table 5 – Contractual Obligations

Maturity Dates by Period at December 31, 2016

Contractual Obligations

Total

Less than
1 year

$156,767
Certificates of deposit
32,306
FHLB fixed advances including interest (1)
-
Subordinated debentures
31,816
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
584
Lease obligations
160
Post-retirement benefits
Total contractual obligations
$221,633
(1) Includes principal payments of $103,943 and interest payments of $3,441.

$433,931
107,384
36,083
31,816
4,462
1,927
$615,603

1-3 years
(In Thousands)
$196,377
40,490
-
-
737
355
$237,959

4-5 years

After 5
years

$80,787
31,426
-
-
487
377
$113,077

-
3,162
36,083
-
2,654
1,035
$42,934

At December 31, 2016, First Defiance had the following commitments to fund loan or line of credit 

obligations:

Table 6 - Commitments

Commitments

Fixed commitments to make loans
Variable commitments to make loans
Fixed unused lines of credit
Variable unused lines of credit
Total loan commitments

Total
Amounts
Committed

$34,432
106,356
14,384
400,542
555,714

Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period

Less than 
1 year

$29,593
91,788
8,638
270,099
400,118

1-3 years
(In Thousands)

4-5 years

$38
1,331
1,265
27,686
30,320

$3,892
277
82
5,838
10,089

After 5
years

$909
12,960
4,399
96,919
115,187

Standby letters of credit

9,668

5,636

4,017

15

-

Total Commitments

$565,382

$405,754

$34,337

$10,104

$115,187

In addition to the above commitments, at December 31, 2016, First Defiance had commitments to 

sell $22.5 million of loans to Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, FHLB of Cincinnati or BB&T Mortgage.

To meet its obligations management can adjust the rate of savings certificates to retain deposits in 
changing interest rate environments; it can sell or securitize mortgage and non-mortgage loans; and it can 
turn to other sources of financing including FHLB advances, the Federal Reserve, and brokered certificates 
of deposit.  At December 31, 2016, First Defiance had $448.9 million in capacity under its agreements with 
the FHLB.

First Federal is subject to various capital requirements of the OCC. At December 31, 2016, First 
Federal  had  capital  ratios  that  exceeded  the  standard  to  be  considered  “well  capitalized.”  For  additional 
information about First Defiance and First Federal’s capital requirements, see Note 17 – Regulatory Matters 
to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

First Defiance has established various accounting policies that govern the application of accounting 
principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  in  the  preparation  of  its  Consolidated  Financial 
Statements.  The  significant  accounting  policies  of  First  Defiance  are  described  in  the  footnotes  to  the 
consolidated  financial  statements.  Certain  accounting  policies  involve  significant  judgments  and 
assumptions  by  management,  which  have  a  material  impact  on  the  carrying  value  of  certain  assets  and 

- 51 - 

- 51 -

 
 
liabilities; Management considers such accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgments 
and  assumptions  used  by  management  are  based  on  historical  experience  and  other  factors,  which  are 
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions 
made by management, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates, which could have a 
material impact on the carrying value of assets and liabilities and the results of operations of First Defiance.

Allowance  for  Loan  Losses  -  First  Defiance  believes  the  allowance  for  loan  losses  is  a  critical 
accounting  policy  that  requires  the  most  significant  judgments  and  estimates  used  in  preparation  of  its 
consolidated financial statements. In determining the appropriate estimate for the allowance for loan losses, 
management considers a number of factors relative to both specific credits in the loan portfolio and macro-
economic factors relative to the economy of the United States as a whole and the economy of the northwest 
Ohio, northeast Indiana and southeast Michigan regions in which the Company does business.

Factors  relative  to  specific  credits  that  are  considered  include  a  customer’s  payment  history,  a 
customer’s  recent  financial  performance,  an  assessment  of  the  value  of  collateral  held,  knowledge  of  the 
customer’s  character,  the  financial  strength  and  commitment  of  any  guarantors,  the  existence  of  any 
customer or industry concentrations, changes in a customer’s competitive environment and any other issues 
that may impact a customer’s ability to meet his obligations. 

Economic factors that are considered include levels of unemployment and inflation, specific plant 
or business closings in the Company’s market area, the impact of strikes or other work stoppages, the impact 
of weather or environmental conditions, especially relative to agricultural borrowers, and other matters that 
may have an impact on the economy as a whole.

In  addition  to  the  identification  of  specific  customers  who  may  be  potential  credit  problems, 
management  considers  its  historical  losses,  the  results  of  independent  loan  reviews,  an  assessment  of the 
adherence  to  underwriting  standards,  and  other  factors  in  providing  for  loan  losses  that  have  not  been 
specifically  classified.  Management  believes  that  the  level  of  its  allowance  for  loan  loss  is  sufficient  to 
cover  the  estimates  loss  incurred  but  not  yet  recognized  on  the  loan  portfolio.  Refer  to  the  section  titled 
“Allowance for Loan Losses” and Note 2, Statement of Accounting Policies for a further description of the 
Company’s estimation process and methodology related to the allowance for loan losses.

Valuation  of  Mortgage  Servicing  Rights  - First  Defiance  believes  the  valuation  of  mortgage 
servicing  rights  is  a  critical  accounting  policy  that  requires  significant  estimates  in  preparation  of  its 
consolidated  financial  statements.  First  Defiance  recognizes  as  separate  assets  the  value  of  mortgage 
servicing rights, which are acquired through loan origination activities. First Defiance does not purchase any 
mortgage servicing rights.

Key  assumptions  made  by  management  relative  to  the  valuation  of  mortgage  servicing  rights 
include  the  stratification  policy  used  in  valuing  servicing,  assumptions  relative  to  future  prepayments  of 
mortgages, the potential value of any escrow deposits maintained or ancillary income received as a result of
the  servicing  activity  and  discount  rates  used  to  value  the  present  value  of  a  future  cash  flow  stream.  In 
assessing  the  value  of  the  mortgage  servicing  rights  portfolio,  management  utilizes  a  third  party  that 
specializes in valuing servicing portfolios. That third party reviews key assumptions with management prior 
to  completing  the  valuation.  Prepayment  speeds  are  determined  based  on  projected  median  prepayment 
speeds for 15 and 30 year mortgage backed securities. Those speeds are then adjusted up or down based on 
the  size  of  the  loan.  The  discount  rate  used  in  this  analysis  is  the  pretax  yield  generally  required  by 
purchasers  of  bulk  servicing  rights  as  of  the  valuation  date.  The  value  of  mortgage  servicing  rights  is 
especially  vulnerable  in  a  falling  interest  rate  environment.  Refer  also  to  the  section  entitled  Mortgage 
Servicing  Rights  and  Note  2  -  Statement  of  Accounting  Policies,  and  Note  8  -  Mortgage Banking,  for  a 
further  description  of  First  Defiance’s  valuation  process,  methodology  and  assumptions  along  with 
sensitivity analyses.

Goodwill  -  First Defiance has  two  reporting  units:  First  Federal  and  First  Insurance.  At 
December 31,  2016, First  Defiance had  goodwill  of  $61.8 million,  including  $51.0  million  in  First 

- 52 - 

- 52 -

Federal,  representing  83%  of  total goodwill  and  $10.8 million  in  First  Insurance,  representing  17%  of 
total goodwill. The carrying value of goodwill is tested annually for impairment or more frequently if it is
determined  appropriate.  The  evaluation  for  impairment  involves  comparing  the  current  estimated  fair 
value of each reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the current estimated fair value of 
a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, no additional testing is required and impairment loss is not 
recorded. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value, further valuation 
procedures are performed and could result in impairment of goodwill being recorded. Further valuation 
procedures would include allocating the estimated fair value to all assets and liabilities of the reporting 
unit to determine an implied goodwill value. If the implied value of goodwill of a reporting unit is less 
than the carrying amount of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that 
excess. 

If, for any future period First Defiance determines that there has been impairment in the carrying 
value of goodwill balances, First Defiance will record a charge to earnings, which could have a material 
adverse effect on net income, but not risk-based capital ratios.

First Defiance has core deposit and other intangible assets resulting from acquisitions which are 
subject to amortization. First Defiance determines the amount of identifiable intangible assets based upon 
independent  core  deposit  and customer  relationship  analyses  at  the  time  of  the  acquisition.  Intangible 
assets with finite useful lives are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances 
indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. No events or changes in circumstances that 
would indicate that the carrying amount of any identifiable intangible assets may not be recoverable had 
occurred during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

- 53 - 

- 53 -

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Asset/Liability Management

A  significant  portion  of  the  Company’s  revenues  and  net  income  is  derived  from  net  interest 
income and, accordingly, the Company strives to manage its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing 
liabilities  to  generate  an  appropriate  contribution  from  net  interest  income.  Asset  and  liability 
management  seeks  to  control  the  volatility  of  the  Company’s  performance  due  to  changes  in  interest 
rates. The Company attempts to achieve an appropriate relationship between rate sensitive assets and rate 
sensitive liabilities. First Defiance does not presently use off balance sheet derivatives to enhance its risk 
management.

First  Defiance  monitors  interest  rate  risk  on  a  monthly  basis  through  simulation  analysis  that 
measures the impact changes in interest rates can have on net interest income. The simulation technique 
analyzes  the  effect  of  a  presumed  100  basis  point  shift  in  interest  rates  (which  is  consistent  with 
management’s  estimate  of  the  range  of  potential  interest rate  fluctuations)  and  takes  into  account 
prepayment speeds on amortizing financial instruments, loan and deposit volumes and rates, non-maturity 
deposit  assumptions  and  capital  requirements.  At  December  31,  2016,  the  results  of  the  simulation 
indicate that in an environment where interest rates rise 100 basis points over a 24 month period, First 
Defiance’s net interest income would increase by 3.08% over the base case scenario. It should be noted 
that  other  areas  of  First  Defiance’s  income  statement,  such as  gains  from  sales  of  mortgage  loans  and 
amortization of mortgage servicing rights are also impacted by fluctuations in interest rates, but are not 
considered in the simulation of net interest income. 

The majority of First Federal’s lending activities are in commercial real estate and commercial 
loan areas. In addition to carrying higher credit risk than residential mortgage lending, such loans tend to 
be  more  rate  sensitive  than  residential  mortgage  loans.  The  balance  of  First  Federal’s  commercial  real 
estate and  multi-family  real  estate  loan  portfolio  was  $1.04  billion,  which  was  split  between  $142.5
million  of  fixed-rate  loans  and  $898.1million  of  adjustable-rate  loans, at  December  31,  2016.  The 
commercial loan portfolio increased to $469.1 million, which was split between $173.1 million of fixed-
rate loans and $296.0 million of adjustable-rate loans, at December 31, 2016. Certain loans classified as 
adjustable have fixed rates for an initial term that may be as long as five years. The maturities on fixed-
rate loans are generally less than seven years. First Federal also has significant balances of home equity 
and  improvement  loans  ($118.4 million at December 31, 2016) of which $104.8 million fluctuate with 
changes in the prime lending rate and $13.7 million of home equity and improvement loans have fixed 
rates. First Federal also has consumer loans ($16.7 million at December 31, 2016) which tend to have a 
shorter duration than residential mortgage loans. Also, to limit its interest rate risk, as well as to provide 
liquidity, First Federal sells a majority of its fixed-rate mortgage originations into the secondary market.

The  table  below  presents,  for  the  twelve  months  subsequent  to  December  31,  2016  and 
December  31,  2015,  an  estimate  of  the  change  in  net  interest  income  that  would  result  from a gradual 
(ramp) and immediate (shock) change in interest rates, moving in a parallel fashion over the entire yield 
curve,  relative  to  the  measured  base  case  scenario.    Based  on  our  net  interest  income  simulation  as  of
December  31,  2016,  net  interest  income  sensitivity  to  changes  in  interest  rates  for  the  twelve  months 
subsequent  to  December  31,  2016 was  more asset  sensitive  for  the  ramp  and  shock  compared  to  the 
sensitivity  profile  for  the  twelve  months  subsequent  to  December  31,  2015.  This is due in part to our 
strategy to grow longer term loans and funding that growth out of existing liquidity.

- 54 - 

- 54 -

Table 7 – Net Interest Income Sensitivity Profile 

(dollars in thousands)
Gradual Change in Interest Rates
+200
+100
-100

Immediate Change in Interest Rates
+200
+100
-100

Impact on Future Annual Net Interest Income

December 31, 2016

December 31, 2015

$

1,970
972
(2,201)

2.32%
1.14%
-2.59%

$     563
215
(1,332)

$

4,236
2,131
(4,132)

4.99% $
2.51%
-4.87%

1,660
719
(2,605)

0.71%
0.27%
-1.68%

2.09%
0.91%
-3.28%

To analyze the impact of changes in interest rates in a more realistic manner, non-parallel interest 
rate  scenarios  are  also  simulated.    These  non-parallel  interest  rate  scenarios  indicate  that  net  interest 
income may decrease from the base case scenario should the yield curve flatten. Conversely, if the yield 
curve should steepen or become inverted, net interest income may increase. 

The  results  of  all  the  simulation  scenarios  are  within  the  board  mandated  guidelines  as  of 

December 31, 2016. 

In addition to the simulation analysis, First Federal also prepares an “economic value of equity” 
(“EVE”)  analysis.  This  analysis  generally  calculates  the  net  present value of First Federal’s assets and 
liabilities in rate shock environments that range from –400 basis points to +400 basis points. However, 
the  likelihood  of  a  decrease  in  interest  rates  beyond  100  basis  points  as  of  December  31,  2016 was 
considered  to  be  unlikely given  the  current  interest  rate  levels  and  therefore  was  not  included  in  this 
analysis. The results of this analysis are reflected in the following table. 

Table 8 – Economic Value of Equity Analysis 

December 31, 2016

Economic Value of Equity

Change in Rates

$ Amount

$ Change

% Change

+ 400 bp
+ 300 bp
+ 200 bp
+ 100 bp
0 bp
- 100 bp

569,397
553,285
534,478
512,132
483,606
429,266

(Dollars in Thousands)
85,791
69,679
50,873
28,526
-
(34,339)

17.74%
14.41%
10.52%
5.90%
-
(7.10)%

December 31, 2015

Change in Rates

$ Amount

$ Change

% Change

Economic Value of Equity

+ 400 bp
+ 300 bp
+ 200 bp
+ 100 bp
0 bp
- 100 bp

509,640
499,038
486,652
471,332
453,095
426,010

(Dollars in Thousands)
56,545
45,943
33,558
18,237
-
(27,085)

12.48%
10.14%
7.41%
4.03%
-
(5.98)%

Economic Value of Equity as % of
Present Value of Assets
Ratio

Change

24.99%
23.86%
22.63%
21.30%
19.77%
17.29%

522 bp
408 bp
286 bp
153 bp
–
(249) bp

Economic Value of Equity as % of
Present Value of Assets
Ratio

Change

24.08%
23.15%
22.15%
21.05%
19.86%
18.39%

422  bp
329  bp
229  bp
119  bp
–
(147) bp

Based  on  the  above  analysis,  in  the  event  of  a  200  basis  point  increase  in  interest  rates  as  of 
December  31,  2016,  First  Federal  would  experience  a  10.52% increase in  its  economic  value  of  equity. 

- 55 - 

- 55 -

During periods of rising rates, the value of monetary assets declines. Conversely, during periods of falling 
rates,  the  value  of  monetary  assets  increases.  It  should  be  noted  that  the  amount  of  change  in  value  of 
specific  assets  and  liabilities  due  to  changes  in  rates  is  not  the  same  in  a  rising  rate  environment  as  in  a 
falling rate environment. Based on the EVE analysis, the change in the economic value of equity in both 
rising and falling rate environments is relatively low because both its assets and liabilities have relatively 
short durations. The average duration of its assets at December 31, 2016 was 1.70 years while the average 
duration of its liabilities was 3.63 years.  

In evaluating First Federal’s exposure to interest rate risk, certain shortcomings inherent in each 
of  the  methods  of  analysis  presented  must  be  considered.  For  example,  although  certain  assets  and 
liabilities  may  have  similar  maturities  or  periods  to  repricing,  they  may  react  in  different  degrees  to 
changes  in  market  interest  rates.  Also,  the  interest  rates  on  certain  types  of  assets  and  liabilities  may 
fluctuate in advance of changes in market rates while interest rates on other types of financial instruments 
may  lag  behind  current  changes  in  market  rates.  Furthermore,  in  the  event  of  changes  in  rates, 
prepayments  and  early  withdrawal  levels  could differ significantly from the assumptions in calculating 
the table and the results therefore may differ from those presented.

- 56 - 

- 56 -

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of First Defiance Financial Corp. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting.  Internal control over financial reporting is defined in  Rule 13a-
15(1)  promulgated  under  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  as  a  process  designed  by,  or  under  the 
supervision  of;  our  principal  executive  and  principal  financial  officers  and  effected  by  the  board  of 
directors,  management  and  other  personnel,  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  the  reliability  of 
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. 
generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions
and dispositions of our assets;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial 
statements  in  accordance  with  U.S.  generally  accepted  accounting  principles,  and  that  our  receipts  and 
expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and  

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or 
disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because  of  its  inherent  limitations,  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  may  not  prevent  or  detect 
misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that 
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with 
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Based  on  our  evaluation  under  the  framework  in  the  2013 Internal  Control  –  Integrated  Framework, 
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 
2016. 

Crowe  Horwath  LLP,  the  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm  that  audited  the  consolidated 
financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued a report 
on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.
The  report,  which  expresses  an  unqualified  opinion  on  the  effectiveness  of  the  Company’s  internal 
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, is herein.

Donald P. Hileman
President and 
Chief Executive Officer  

Kevin T. Thompson 
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

- 57 - 

- 57 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Crow
Indepe

we Horwath LLP
endent Member Crowe

al
e Horwath Internationa

REPOR

RT OF INDEP

PENDENT RE

EGISTERED P

PUBLIC ACC

COUNTING FI

IRM 

Members 
First Defia
Defiance,

Ohio 

of the Audit C
ance Financia

Committee 
al Corp. 

We  have 
Financial 
statement
the  years
Financial 
establishe
Organizat
for these 
assessme
Managem
opinion  o
reporting 

audited  the 
Corp.  (the  “
ts of income, 
s  in  the  three
Corp.’s  inter
ed in the 2013
tions  of  the  T
financial state
ent of the effe
ment’s  Report
n  these  finan
based on our

accompanyi
“Company”)  a
comprehensi
e-year  period
rnal  control  o
3 Internal Co
Treadway Com
ements, for m
ectiveness of 
t  on  Internal 
ncial  stateme
r audits. 

ing  consolida
as  of  Decem
ive income, c
d  ended  Dec
over  financial
ontrol – Integr
mmission (the
maintaining ef
internal contr
Control  over 
ents  and  an  o

ated  stateme
mber  31,  201
changes in sto
ember  31,  2
  reporting  as
rated Framew
e “COSO”).  T
ffective intern
rol over finan
Financial  Re
opinion  on  th

nts  of  financ
16  and  2015
ockholders' eq
2016.  We  als
s  of  Decemb
work issued b
The Company
al control ove
cial reporting
eporting.  Our 
he  Company's

cial  condition 
5  and  the  re
quity and cas
so  have  audi
ber  31,  2016,
by the Commi
y's managem
er financial re
g, included in 
r responsibility
s  internal  con

  of  First  Def
lated  consoli
sh flows for ea
ted  First  Def
  based  on  c
ittee of Spons
ment  is respo
eporting, and 
the accompa
y  is  to  expre
ntrol  over  fin

fiance 
idated
ach of 
fiance
criteria 
soring 
nsible 
for its 
anying
ess  an 
ancial 

We condu
Board (Un
assurance
internal co
statement
financial 
managem
over  finan
assessing
effectiven
other proc
reasonab

ucted our aud
nited States).
e about wheth
ontrol over fin
ts included ex
statements, 
ment,  and  eva
ncial  reporting
g the risk that
ess  of  intern
cedures, as w
le basis for ou

dits in accord
Those stand
her the financ
nancial report
xamining, on 
assessing  th
aluating  the  o
g  included  ob
t a material w
al  control  ba
we considered
ur opinions. 

ance with the
dards require 
cial statement
ting was main
a test basis, 
he  accountin
overall  financ
btaining  an  u
weakness exi
sed  on  the  a
d necessary in

e standards o
that we plan 
ts are free of 
ntained in all 
evidence su
ng  principles 
cial  statemen
understanding
sts, and testi
assessed  risk
n the circums

of the Public C
and perform 
material miss
material resp
pporting the 
used  and  s
t  presentatio
g  of  internal  c
ng and evalu
k.  Our  audits 
stances. We b

Company Acc
the audits to 
statement and
pects. Our aud
amounts and
significant  es
n.  Our  audit 
control  over  f
uating the des
also  include
believe that o

counting Ove
 obtain reaso
d whether eff
dits of the fin
d disclosures 
stimates  mad
of  internal  c
financial  repo
sign and ope
d  performing
ur audits prov

ersight 
onable 
fective 
ancial 
in the 
de  by 
control 
orting, 
erating 
g  such 
vide a 

A  compa
assurance
external  p
control ov
of records
assets of 
permit  pre
and  that 
authorizat
regarding
assets tha

ny's  internal 
e  regarding  t
purposes  in  a
ver financial re
s that, in reas
the company
eparation  of  f
receipts  an
tions  of  man
prevention o
at could have

control  ove
the  reliability 
accordance  w
eporting inclu
sonable detai
y; (2) provide 
financial  state
nd  expenditu
agement  and
or timely dete
a material ef

r  financial  re
of  financial  r
with  generally
udes those po
il, accurately 
reasonable a
ements  in  ac
ures  of  the 
d  directors  o
ction of unau
ffect on the fin

eporting  is  a
reporting  and
y  accepted  a
olicies and pro
and fairly ref
assurance tha
ccordance  wit
company  ar
of  the  compa
thorized acqu
nancial statem

a  process  de
d  the  prepara
accounting  pr
ocedures that
flect the trans
at transaction
th  generally  a
re  being  ma
any;  and  (3) 
uisition, use, 
ments. 

esigned  to  p
ation  of  financ
rinciples.  A  c
t (1) pertain t
sactions and 
ns are recorde
accepted  acc
ade  only  in 
provide  reas
or disposition

provide  reaso
cial  statemen
company's  in
to the mainten
dispositions
ed as necess
counting  princ
accordance
sonable  assu
n of the comp

onable 
nts  for 
nternal
nance 
of the 
ary to 
ciples,
e  with 
urance 
pany's 

Continued) 
(C

- 58 -

1.

Because
misstatem
that contro
with the p

of  its  inhere
ments. Also, p
ols may beco
policies or pro

nt  limitations
projections of 
ome inadequa
cedures may 

,  internal  con
any evaluatio
ate because o
deteriorate. 

ntrol  over  fin
on of effective
of changes in 

ancial  report
eness to futur
conditions, o

ting  may  not 
re periods are
or that the deg

prevent  or  d
e subject to th
gree of comp

detect 
he risk 
liance 

In  our  op
respects, 
the  result
Decembe
America.
internal  c
2013 Inte

pinion,  the  co
the financial 
ts  of  its  oper
er  31,  2016  in
Also in our o
ontrol  over  fi
rnal Control –

onsolidated  f
position of Fi
rations  and  it
n  conformity  w
pinion, First D
nancial  repo
– Integrated F

financial  state
irst Defiance 
ts  cash  flows
with  accounti
Defiance Fina
rting  as  of  D
Framework iss

ements  refer
Financial Co
s  for  each  of
ing  principles
ancial Corp. m
December  31,
sued by the C

red  to  above
rp. as of Dec
f  the  years  i
s  generally  ac
maintained, in
,  2016,  based
COSO.

e  present  fai
cember 31, 20
n  the  three-y
ccepted  in  th
n all material 
d  on  criteria 

rly,  in  all  ma
016 and 2015
year  period  e
e  United  Sta
respects, eff
established 

aterial
5, and 
ended 
tes  of 
fective 
in  the 

Crow

we Horwath L

LLP

South Ben
February

nd, Indiana 
28, 2017

- 59 -

2.

First Defiance Financial Corp.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
Dollars in Thousands, except per share data 

Assets
Cash and cash equivalents:

Cash and amounts due from depository institutions

$

Federal funds sold

Securities available-for-sale, carried at fair value
Securities held-to-maturity, carried at amortized cost (fair value $187 and 

$245 at December 31, 2016 and 2015 respectively)

Loans held for sale

Loans receivable, net of allowance of $25,884 and 

December 31

2016

2015

53,003

46,000

99,003

250,992

184
251,176

9,607

$       38,769

41,000 

79,769 

236,435 

243
236,678 

5,523

$25,382 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively

1,914,603

1,776,835 

Mortgage servicing rights

Accrued interest receivable

Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock

Bank owned life insurance

Premises and equipment

Real estate and other assets held for sale (REO)

Goodwill 

Core deposit and other intangibles

Deferred taxes

Other assets

Total assets

9,595

6,760

13,798

52,817

36,958

455

61,798

1,336

2,212

17,479

9,248

6,171 

13,801 

51,908 

38,166 

1,321 

61,798 

1,871 

- 

14,587 

$

2,477,597

$    2,297,676

- 60 - 

- 60 -

 
 
First Defiance Financial Corp
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (continued)
Dollars in Thousands, except per share data

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Liabilities:

Deposits:

Noninterest-bearing

Interest-bearing

Total

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

Subordinated debentures

Advance payments by borrowers 

Deferred taxes

Other liabilities

Total liabilities

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Note 6)

Stockholders’ equity: 

Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share: 37,000 shares authorized;

no shares issued

Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share:

4,963,000 shares authorized; no shares issued

Common stock, $.01 par value per share:

25,000,000 shares authorized; 12,720,347 and 12,721,959 shares issued

and 8,983,206 and 9,102,831 shares outstanding, respectively

Additional paid-in capital

Accumulated other comprehensive income,

net of tax of $117 and $1,950, respectively

Retained earnings

Treasury stock, at cost, 3,737,141 and 3,619,128

shares respectively

Total stockholders’ equity

December 31

2016 

2015 

$

487,663

$

420,691

1,493,965

1,981,628

103,943

31,816

36,083

2,650

- 

28,459

1,415,446

1,836,137

59,902

57,188

36,083

2,674

877

24,618

2,184,579

2,017,479

– 

– 

127

126,390

215

240,592

(74,306) 

293,018

– 

– 

127

125,734

3,622

219,737

(69,023)

280,197

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

2,477,597

$

2,297,676

See accompanying notes.

- 61 - 

- 61 -

  
  
 
 
 
FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Income 
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands, except per share data)

Years Ended December 31
2015

2014

2016

$

80,217

$

73,346

$

68,682

3,231
3,016
367
552
87,383

6,261
1,288
753
138
8,440
78,943

283
78,660

10,909
7,270
10,441
753
509
1,701
909
1,538
34,030

40,187
7,418
1,169
6,367
15,952
71,093

41,597
12,754
28,843

3.21
3.19
0.880

$

$
$
$

3,598
3,171
169
552
80,836

5,341
675
613
152
6,781
74,055

136
73,919

10,752
6,713
10,076
824
22
1,462
895
1,059
31,803

37,769
7,197
1,324
6,083
15,516
67,889

37,833
11,410
26,423

2.87
2.82
0.775

$

$
$
$

3,507
3,068
349
642
76,248

5,283
528
587
161
6,559
69,689

1,117
68,572

10,258
5,602
9,859
181
932
1,240
1,802
1,767
31,641

35,543
6,683
1,419
5,856
17,257
66,758

33,455
9,163
24,292

2.55
2.44
0.625

$

$
$
$

Interest Income

Loans
Investment securities:

Taxable
Tax-exempt

Interest-bearing deposits
FHLB stock dividends

Total interest income

Interest Expense

Deposits
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other
Subordinated debentures
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase

Total interest expense
Net interest income

Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses

Noninterest Income

Service fees and other charges
Mortgage banking income
Insurance commissions
Gain on sale of non-mortgage loans
Gain (loss) on sale or call of securities
Trust income
Income from bank owned life insurance
Other noninterest income (Note 15)

Total noninterest income

Noninterest Expense

Compensation and benefits
Occupancy
FDIC insurance
Data processing
Other noninterest expense

Total noninterest expense

Income before income taxes
Federal income taxes
Net Income

Earnings per common share (Note 4)

Basic
Diluted

Dividends declared per common share

See accompanying notes

- 62 - 
- 62 -

 
FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)

For the Years Ended December 31

2016

2015

2014

$28,843

$26,423

$24,292

6,763

(932)
5,831

(2,040)
3,791

(377)
35
(342)
120
(222)

3,569
$27,861

Net income
Change in securities available-for-sale (AFS):

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale 
securities arising during the period
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized in 
income
Net unrealized gains (losses)

Income tax effect
Net of tax amount

Change in unrealized gain/(loss) on postretirement benefit:
Net gain (loss) on defined benefit postretirement medical

plan realized during the period

Net amortization and deferral
Net gain (loss) activity during the period
Income tax effect
Net of tax amount

(4,933)

(985)

(509)
(5,442)

1,904
(3,538)

(22)
(1,007)

352
(655)

172
30
202
(71)
131

204
47
251
(88)
163

Total other comprehensive income  (loss)
Comprehensive income 

(3,407)
$25,436

(492)
$25,931

See accompanying notes

63

- 63 -

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(Dollar Amounts In Thousands, except number of shares)

Balance at January 1, 2014

Net income
Other comprehensive income
Stock based compensation expenses
Shares issued under stock option plan
Restricted share activity under stock incentive

plans

Shares issued from direct stock sales
Shares repurchased
Common stock dividends declared

Preferred
Stock

$

-

Common
Stock
Shares
9,719,521

Common
Stock
$       127

Common
Stock
Warrant

$

878

Additional
Paid-In
Capital
$ 136,403

52,258

13,087
2,804
(553,136)

78
88

(334)
31

Balance at December 31, 2014

$

-

9,234,534

$       127

$

878

$ 136,266

$

4,114

Net income
Other comprehensive loss
Stock based compensation expenses
Warrant repurchase
Shares issued under stock option plan,

net of 14,350 repurchased and retired
Restricted share activity under stock incentive

plans

Excess tax benefit on stock compensation plans
Shares issued from direct stock sales
Shares repurchased
Common stock dividends declared

74,300

18,006

1,799
(225,808)

(878)

150
(11,101)

(492)

230

(58)
216
31

Balance at December 31, 2015

$

-

9,102,831

$       127

$

-

$ 125,734

$

3,622

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
$           545

3,569

Retained
Earnings
$ 182,290
24,292

Treasury
Stock
$ (48,096)

(45)

878

Total
Stockholder’s
Equity
$    272,147
24,292
3,569
78
921

(5,937)
$ 200,600
26,423

(313)

186

(7,159)
$ 219,737
28,843

(26)

(72)

212
45
(15,519)

$ (62,480)

1,552

308

33
(8,436)

$ (69,023)

761

219
30
(6,293)

(122)
76
(15,519)
(5,937)
$    279,505
26,423
(492)
150
(11,979)

1,469

436
216
64
(8,436)
(7,159)
$    280,197
28,843
(3,407)
274

714

517
63
(6,293)
(7,890)
$    293,018

Net income
Other comprehensive loss
Stock based compensation expenses
Shares issued under stock option plan,

net of 1,612 repurchased and retired
Restricted share activity under stock incentive

plans 

Shares issued from direct stock sales
Shares repurchased
Common stock dividends declared

Balance at December 31, 2016

See accompanying notes

36,358

10,405
1,480
(167,868)

(3,407)

274

(21)

370
33

$

-

8,983,206

$       127

$

-

$ 126,390

$

215

(7,890)
$ 240,592

$ (74,306)

64

- 64 -

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)

Operating Activities
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash

provided by operating activities:

Provision for loan losses
Provision for depreciation
Net amortization of premium and discounts on loans,

securities, deposits and debt obligations 

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights
Net impairment (recovery)  of mortgage servicing rights
Amortization of intangibles
Gain on sale of loans
Loss on sale or disposals or write-downs of property, plant

and equipment

(Gain) loss on sale or write-down of REO
(Gain) loss on sale or call of securities
Change in deferred taxes
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale
Origination of loans held for sale
Stock  based compensation expenses
Restricted stock unit expense (credit)
Excess tax benefit (expense)on stock compensation plans
Income from bank owned life insurance
Change in interest receivable and other assets
Change in accrued interest and other liabilities

Net cash provided by operating activities

Investing Activities
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of held-to-maturity 
securities
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of available-for-sale 
securities
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities
Proceeds from sale of REO
Proceeds from sale of office properties and equipment
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
Purchases of office properties and equipment
Investment in bank owned life insurance
Proceeds from FHLB stock redemption
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance death benefit
Net cash paid in Buckeye Insurance acquisition
Purchase of portfolio mortgage loans
Proceeds from sale of non-mortgage loans
Net increase in loans receivable
Net cash used in investing activities

Years Ended December 31
2015

2016

2014

$ 28,843

$ 26,423

$ 24,292

283
3,356

1,128
1,724
(123)
535
(6,064)

-
(300)
(509)
(615)
262,958
(263,679)
274
517
(192)
(909)
(4,121)
3,878
26,984

136
3,267

1,148
1,620
(266)
699
(5,388)

428
150
(22)
(35)
215,402
(213,416)
150
436
216
(895)
(1,356)
1,955
30,652

1,117
2,952

1,020
1,401
(116)
1,102
(3,517)

-
(73)
(932)
(179)
159,305
(153,753)
78
(122)
-
(1,802)
(5,962)
5,254
30,065

59 

69

73

36,390

14,871
1,705
1
(71,276)
(2,106)
-
3
-
-
(822)
20,816
(158,121)
(158,480)

31,240

20,400

426
3,407
212
(30,483)
(1,843)
(4,000)
1
-
(297)
-
24,027
(177,013)
(154,254)

14,913
2,108
84
(70,149)
(4,935)
(3,406)
5,548
910
-
(16,594)
20,592
(73,206)
(103,662)

65

- 65 -

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)

Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits and advance payments by borrowers
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank long-term advances
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank long-term advances
Increase (decrease) in securities sold under repurchase agreements
Cash dividends paid on common stock
Net cash paid for repurchase of common stock
Repayment of warrants
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Proceeds from direct treasury stock sales
Net cash  provided by financing activities

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid
Income taxes paid
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned and other

assets held for sale

Transfer  from  real  estate  owned  and  other  assets  held  for sale to 

loans

Transfer from (to) property and equipment to real estate and other 

assets held for sale

Transfer from loans held for sale to loans
Securities traded but not yet settled

See accompanying notes.

Years Ended December 31
2015

2016

2014

145,467
(959)
45,000
(25,372)
(7,890)
(6,293)
-
714
63
150,730

19,234
79,769
$ 99,003

75,689
(8,642)
47,000
2,429
(7,159)
(8,436)
(11,979)
1,469
64
90,435

25,810
(976)
-
2,840
(5,937)
(15,519)
-
921
76
7,215

(33,167)
112,936
$  79,769

(66,382)
179,318
$  112,936

$

8,370
12,700

$

6,764
10,000

$

583

-

(44)
-
357

974

2,544

267
-
-

6,557
8,950

2,357

-

-
1,178
-

66

- 66 -

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Basis of Presentation 

First  Defiance  Financial  Corp.  (“First  Defiance” or  the  “Company”)  is  a  unitary  thrift  holding  company  that 
conducts  business  through  its  three  wholly  owned  subsidiaries,  First  Federal  Bank  of  the  Midwest  (“First 
Federal”), First Insurance Group of the Midwest, Inc. (“First Insurance”), and First Defiance Risk Management, 
Inc. (“First Defiance Risk Management”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated
in consolidation.  

First Federal is primarily engaged in attracting deposits from the general public through its offices and using 
those and other available sources of funds to originate loans primarily in the counties in which its offices are 
located. First Federal’s traditional banking activities include originating and servicing residential, commercial 
and  consumer  loans  and  providing  a  broad  range  of  depository,  trust  and  wealth  management services.  First 
Insurance is an insurance agency that does business in the Defiance, Bryan, Bowling Green, Lima, Maumee and 
Oregon, Ohio areas, offering property and casualty, and group health and life insurance products. First Defiance 
Risk Management was incorporated on December 20, 2012, as a wholly owned insurance company subsidiary 
of the Company to insure the Company and its subsidiaries against certain risks unique to the operations of the 
Company and for which insurance may not be currently available or economically feasible in today’s insurance 
marketplace.

2. Statement of Accounting Policies 

Use of Estimates

The  preparation  of  consolidated  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  accounting  principles generally 
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect 
the  amounts  reported  in  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  accompanying  notes.  These  estimates  and
assumptions  affect  the  amounts  reported  in  the  financial  statements  and  the  disclosures  provided,  and  actual 
results could differ.  

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income applicable to common shares (net income 
less  dividend  requirements  for  preferred  stock, accretion  of  preferred  stock  discount and  redemption  of 
preferred stock)  by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. All 
outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends are considered 
participating  securities  for  the  calculation.  Diluted  earnings  per  common  share  includes  the  dilutive  effect of 
additional  potential  common  shares  issuable  under  stock  options, warrants,  restricted  stock  awards and  stock 
grants.  See also Note 4.  

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive  income  consists  of  net  income  and  other  comprehensive  income  (loss).  Other  comprehensive 
income  (loss)  includes  unrealized  gains  and  losses  on  available-for-sale  securities  and  the  net  unrecognized 
actuarial  losses  and  unrecognized  prior  service  costs  associated  with  the  Company’s  Defined  Benefit 
Postretirement  Medical  Plan.  All  items  included  in  other  comprehensive  income  are  reported  net  of  tax.  See 
also Notes 5, 16 and 25 and the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.  

67

- 67 -

Cash Flows 

Cash and cash equivalents include amounts due from banks and overnight investments with the Federal Home 
Loan  Bank  (“FHLB”)  and  the  Federal  Reserve.  Cash  and  amounts  due  from  depository  institutions  include 
required  balances  on  hand  or  on  deposit  at  the  FHLB  and  Federal  Reserve  of  approximately  $1,809,000  and 
$1,896,000, respectively, at December 31, 2016 to meet regulatory reserve and clearing requirements. Net cash
flows  are  reported  for  customer  loan  and  deposit  transactions,  interest  bearing  deposits  in  other  financial 
institutions and repurchase agreements.

Investment Securities

Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase and evaluates 
such  designation  as  of  each  balance  sheet  date.  Debt  securities  are  classified  as  held-to-maturity  when  First 
Defiance has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity and are reported at cost, adjusted 
for premiums and discounts that are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the period to 
maturity. 

Debt  securities  not  classified  as  held-to-maturity  and  equity  securities  are  classified  as  available-for-sale. 
Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in 
other  comprehensive  income  (loss) until  realized.  Realized  gains  and  losses are  included in gains (losses) on 
securities or other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities. Realized gains and losses on securities sold 
are recognized on the trade date based on the specific identification method.  

Interest  income  includes  amortization  of  purchase  premiums  and  discounts.  Premiums  and  discounts  are 
amortized  on  the  level-yield  method  without  anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage-backed securities 
where prepayments are expected. Securities with unrealized losses are reviewed quarterly to determine if value 
impairment  is  other–than-temporary.  In  performing  this  review  management  considers  the  length  of time and 
extent  that  fair  value  has  been  less  than  cost,  the  financial  condition  of  the  issuer,  the  impact  of  changes  in 
market interest rates on market value and whether the Company intends to sell or it would be more than likely 
required  to  sell  the  securities  prior  to  their  anticipated  recovery.
If  either  of  the  criteria  regarding  intent  or 
requirement  to  sell  is  met,  the  entire  difference  between  amortized  cost  and  fair  value  is  recognized  as 
impairment  through  earnings.  For  debt  securities  that  do  not  meet  the aforementioned criteria, the amount of 
impairment is split into two components as follows: (1) other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) related to 
credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement and (2) OTTI related to other factors, which is 
recognized  in  other  comprehensive  income. The  credit  loss  is  defined  as  the  difference  between  the  present 
value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis. For equity securities, the entire 
amount of impairment is recognized through earnings. 

FHLB Stock

First Federal is a member of the FHLB system.  Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based 
on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts.  FHLB stock is carried at 
cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of 
par value.  Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.  At December 31, 2016, the Company held 
$13.8 million at the FHLB of Cincinnati and $5,000 at the FHLB of Indianapolis.  

Loans Receivable 

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff 
are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of deferred loan fees and costs, purchase premiums and 
discounts and the allowance for loan losses. Deferred fees net of deferred incremental loan origination costs, 

68

- 68 -

are amortized to interest income generally over the contractual life of the loan using the interest method without 
anticipating  prepayments. The  recorded  investment  in  loans  includes  accrued  interest  receivable and  net 
deferred fees and costs and undisbursed loan amounts. 

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are classified as loans held for sale and 
are  carried  at  the  lower  of  aggregate  cost  or  fair  value,  as  determined  by  outstanding  commitments  from 
investors.  Net  unrealized  losses,  if  any,  are  recorded  as  a  valuation  allowance  and  charged  to  earnings. 
Mortgage loans held for sale are generally sold with servicing rights retained. The carrying value of mortgage 
loans sold is reduced by the amount allocated to the servicing right. Gains or losses on sales of mortgage loans 
are based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related loan sold. 

The Company may incur losses pertaining to loans sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac but repurchased due to 
underwriting issues.    Repurchase losses are recognized when the Company determines they are probable and 
estimable.

Interest  receivable  is  accrued  on  loans  and  credited  to  income  as  earned.  The  accrual  of interest on loans 90 
days  delinquent  or  impaired  is  discontinued  when,  in  management’s  opinion,  the  borrower  may  be  unable  to 
meet  payments  as  they  become  due.  For  these  loans, interest  accrual  is  only  to  the  extent  cash  payments  are 
received.  The  accrual  of  interest  on  these  loans  is  generally  resumed  after  a  pattern  of  repayment  has  been 
established and the collection of principal and interest is reasonably assured.

Acquired Loans

The  Company  acquires  loans  individually  and  in  groups  or  portfolios. At  acquisition,  the  Company  reviews 
each loan to determine whether there is evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and if it is 
probable  that  it  will  be  unable  to  collect  all  amounts  due  according  to  the  loan’s  contractual  terms.  If  both 
conditions exist, the Company determines whether each such loan is to be accounted for individually or whether 
such loans will be assembled into pools of loans based on common risk characteristics (credit score, loan type 
and date of origination). The Company considers expected prepayments, and estimates the amount and timing 
of undiscounted expected principal, interest, and other cash flows (expected at acquisition) for each loan and 
subsequently aggregated pool of loans. 

The  Company  determines  the  excess  of  the  loan’s  or  pool’s  scheduled  contractual  principal  and  contractual 
interest  payments  over  all  cash  flows  expected at  acquisition  as  an  amount  that  should  not  be  accreted 
(nonaccretable difference). The remaining amount—representing the excess of the loan’s cash flows expected 
to  be  collected  over  the  amount  paid—is  accreted  into  interest  income  over  the  remaining  life of the loan or 
pool (accretable yield).

Over the life of the loan or pool, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected, and 
evaluates whether the present value of its loans determined using the effective interest rates has decreased and,
if  so,  recognizes  a  loss.  Valuation  allowances  for  all  acquired  loans  subject to FASB ASC Topic 310 reflect 
only those losses incurred after acquisition—that is, the present value of cash flows expected at acquisition that 
are  not  expected  to  be  collected. The  present  value  of  any  subsequent  increase  in  the  loan’s  or  pool’s actual 
cash flows or cash flows expected to be collected is used first to reverse any existing valuation allowance for 
that loan or pool. For any remaining increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company adjusts the 
amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan’s or pool’s remaining life.

69

- 69 -

Allowance for Loan Losses

The  allowance  for  loan  losses  is  maintained  at  a  level  believed  adequate  by  management  to  absorb  probable 
incurred  losses  in  the  loan  portfolio  and  is  based  on  the  size  and  current  risk  characteristics  of  the  loan 
portfolio,  an  assessment  of  individual  problem  loans,  actual  loss  experience,  current  economic  events  in 
specific industries and geographical areas and other pertinent factors, including general economic conditions. 
Determination  of  the  allowance  is  inherently  subjective  as  it  requires  significant  estimates,  including  the 
amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous 
loans based on historical loss experience and consideration of economic trends, all of which may be susceptible 
to significant change. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is 
available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off. 

Beginning  June  30,  2015,  the  Company  refined  the  methodology  to  its  allowance  for  loan  loss  calculation 
pertaining to the general reserve component for non-impaired loans.  There was no change to the calculation of 
the component for reserves on impaired loans.  Within the general reserve, the determination of the historical 
loss component was modified from using a three-year average annual loss rate to a loss migration measurement. 
The  loss  migration  measurement  implemented  June  30,  2015,  utilized  an  average  of  four  (4)  four-year  loss 
migration periods for each loan portfolio segment with differentiation between loan risk grades.  Prior to June 
30, 2015, the approach to this component quantified the historical loss by calculating a rolling twelve quarter 
average  annual  loss  rate  for  each  portfolio  segment,  without  differentiation  between  loan  risk  grades.  
Beginning December 31, 2016 the historical loss calculation was changed from using an average of four (4) four-
year loss migration periods to using an average of all four-year loss migration periods to the present beginning with 
data from the second quarter 2011. Management believes this enhancement is consistent with the rationale of the 
previous measurement but provides a more precise calculation of historical losses by incorporating more data points 
for  the  average  loss  ratio  and  including  periods that provide a more complete coverage of the full business cycle.  
Management believes that capturing the risk grade changes and cumulative losses over the life cycle of a loan 
more  accurately  depicts  management’s  estimate  of  historical  losses  as  well  as  being  more  reflective  of  the 
ongoing risks in the loan portfolio.    These modifications resulted in a change in the general reserves between 
the loan portfolio segments but did not have a material impact on the overall allowance for loan losses. 

Loan losses are charged off against the allowance when in management’s estimation it is unlikely that the loan 
will be collected, while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the allowance. A provision 
for  loan  loss  is  charged  to  operations  based  on  management’s  periodic  evaluation  of  the factors  previously 
mentioned,  as  well  as  other  pertinent  factors  in  order  to  maintain  the  allowance  for  loan  losses  at  the  level 
deemed adequate by management. The determination of whether a loan is considered past due or delinquent is 
based on the contractual payment terms.  Loans are considered past due when the contractual amounts due with 
respect  to  principal  and  interest  are  not  received  within  30  days  of  the  contractual  due  date.    All  loans  are 
placed  on  nonaccrual  status  at  90  days  past  due unless  the  loan  is  adequately  secured  and  is  in  process  of 
collection.  Any loan in the portfolio may be placed on nonaccrual status prior to becoming 90 days past due 
when collection of principal or interest is in doubt.  

The allowance consists of specific and general components.  The specific component relates to loans that are 
individually classified as impaired.  Impaired loans have been recognized in conformity with FASB ASC Topic 
310.

A  loan  is  impaired  when,  based  on  current  information  and  events,  it  is  probable  that  the  Company  will  be 
unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loans agreement. Loans, for which 
terms  have  been  modified  and  for  which  the  borrower  is  experiencing  financial  difficulties,  are  considered 
troubled debt restructurings and classified as impaired.   An analysis of the net present value of estimated cash 
flows is performed and an allowance may be established based on the outcome of that analysis, or if the loan is 
deemed  to  be  collateral  dependent  an  allowance  is  established  based  on  the  fair  value  of  collateral. All 

70

- 70 -

modifications  are  reviewed  by  the  First  Federal’s  Chief  Credit  Officer to  determine  whether  or  not  the 
modification  constitutes  a  troubled  debt  restructure.  Commercial  and  commercial  real  estate  loans  are 
individually evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the 
loan  is  reported  net  of  the  allowance  allocation  which  is  determined  based  on  the present value of estimated 
future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely 
from the collateral. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and residential real 
estate loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are not separately identified for 
impairment disclosures.

The following portfolio segments have been identified:  

Commercial  Real  Estate  Loans  (consisting  of  multi-family  residential  and  non-residential): Commercial  real 
estate  loans  are  subject  to  underwriting  standards  and  processes  similar  to  commercial  and  industrial  loans. 
These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and the repayment of these loans is largely dependent on 
the successful operation of the property. Loan performance may be adversely affected by factors impacting the 
general  economy  or  conditions  specific  to  the  real  estate  market  such  as  geographic  location  and/or  property 
type.

Commercial  Loans:    Commercial  credit  is  extended  primarily  to  middle  market  customers.  Such  credits  are 
typically  comprised  of  working  capital  loans,  loans  for  physical  asset  expansion,  asset  acquisition  loans  and 
other business loans. Loans to closely held businesses will generally be guaranteed in full or for a meaningful 
amount by the businesses' principal owners. Commercial loans are made based primarily on the historical and 
projected cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The 
cash flows of borrowers, however, may not behave as forecasted and collateral securing loans may fluctuate in 
value due to economic or individual performance factors. Minimum standards and underwriting guidelines have 
been established for all commercial loan types.

Consumer  Finance  Loans:   Consumer finance loans are generally made to borrowers for a specific consumer 
purchase and are made based on their ability to repay with their current debt to income as well as the underlying 
collateral value of the item being purchased.  Credit scores are part of the decision process of whether or not 
credit  is  extended.    Minimum  standards  and  underwriting  guidelines  have  been  established  for  all  consumer 
loan types. 

1-4  Family  Residential  Real  Estate  Loans:    1-4  family  residential  real  estate  loans  can  be  categorized  two 
different ways.  One part of this portfolio is owner occupied and are made based primarily on the ability of the 
individual borrower to support the payments as well as the payments of any other debt the borrower may have 
outstanding  at  the  time  the  loan  is  made.    The  other  part  of  this  portfolio  is  non-owner  occupied  income 
producing property and is made primarily based on the cash flow stream from rental income as well as the cash 
flow support from the borrower’s unrelated cash flow.  Both types of loans have a secondary repayment source 
of the underlying collateral and generally the loans are not extended at higher than an 80% LTV.  Minimum 
standards and underwriting guidelines have been established for all 1-4 family residential real estate loan types.

Construction Loans:  The Company defines construction loans as loans where the loan proceeds are controlled 
by  the  Company  and  used  exclusively  for  the  improvement  of  real  estate  in  which  the  Company  holds  a 
mortgage. 

Home Equity and Improvement Loans:  Home Equity and Improvement loans are made to borrowers based on 
their  ability  to  repay  with  their  current  debt  to  income  as  well  as  the  underlying  collateral  value  of  the  real 
estate  taken  as  security.    Minimum  standards  and  underwriting  guidelines  have  been  established  for  all  1-4 
family residential real estate loan types.

71

- 71 -

Consumer finance, 1-4 family residential real estate (including construction) and home equity and improvement 
loans are subject to adverse employment conditions in the local economy which could increase default rate on 
loans. 

Servicing Rights

Servicing rights are recognized separately when they are acquired through sales of loans. Servicing rights are 
initially recorded at fair value with the income statement effect recorded in gains on sales of loans. Fair value is 
based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based 
on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation 
model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, 
such  as  the  cost  to  service,  the  discount  rate,  the  custodial  earnings  rate,  an  inflation  rate,  ancillary  income, 
prepayment speeds and default rates and losses. The Company compares the valuation model inputs and results 
to published industry data in order to validate the model results and assumptions. All classes of servicing assets 
are subsequently measured using the amortization method which requires servicing rights to be amortized into 
non-interest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the 
underlying loans, driven, generally, by changes in market interest rates.

Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to carrying 
amount.  Impairment  is  determined  by  stratifying  rights  into  groupings  based  on  predominant  risk 
characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type and investor type. Impairment is recognized through a valuation 
allowance  for  an  individual  grouping,  to  the  extent  that  fair  value  is  less  than  the  carrying  amount. If  the 
Company later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular grouping, a 
reduction  of  the  allowance  may  be  recorded  as  an  increase  to  income. Changes  in  valuation  allowances  are 
reported with mortgage banking income on the income statement. The fair values of servicing rights are subject 
to  significant  fluctuations  as  a  result  of  changes  in  estimated and actual prepayment speeds and default rates 
and losses.

Servicing fee income, which is reported on the income statement with mortgage banking income, is recorded for 
fees earned for servicing loans. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal, or a 
fixed amount per loan, and are recorded as income when earned. The amortization of mortgage servicing rights 
is netted against loan servicing fee income. Servicing fees totaled $3.6 million, $3.5 million and $3.6 million for 
the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. Late fees and ancillary fees related to loan servicing are 
not material. See Note 8.

Bank Owned Life Insurance

The  Company  has  purchased  life  insurance  policies for certain key employees. Bank owned life insurance is 
recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the 
cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.

Premises and Equipment and Long Lived Assets

Land  is  carried  at  cost.  Premises  and  equipment  are  carried  at  cost  less  accumulated  depreciation  and 
amortization computed principally by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: 

Buildings and improvements
Furniture, fixtures and equipment

20 to 50 years
3 to 15 years

Long-lived assets to be held and those to be disposed of and certain intangibles are periodically evaluated for 
impairment. See Note 9. 

72

- 72 -

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Goodwill resulting from business combinations prior to January 1, 2009 represents the excess of the purchase 
price  over  the  fair  value  of  the  net  assets  of  businesses  acquired.  Goodwill  resulting  from  business 
combinations after January 1, 2009, is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration 
transferred,  plus  the  fair  value  of  any  noncontrolling  interests  in  the  acquiree,  over  the  fair  value  of  the  net 
assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a 
purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but tested for 
impairment  at  least  annually.  The  Company  has  selected  November  30  as  the  date  to  perform  the  annual
impairment  test.  Intangible  assets  with  definite  useful  lives  are  amortized  over  their  estimated useful lives to 
their estimated residual values. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on First Defiance’s
balance sheet. 

Other intangible assets consist of core deposit and acquired customer relationship intangible assets arising from 
whole bank, insurance and branch acquisitions. They are initially recorded at fair value and then amortized on 
an accelerated basis over their estimated lives, which range from five years for non-compete agreements to 10 
to 20 years for core deposit and customer relationship intangibles. See Note 10.

Real Estate and Other Assets Held for Sale

Real  estate  and  other  assets  held  for  sale  are  comprised  of  properties or  other  assets acquired  through 
foreclosure proceedings or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. These assets are initially recorded at fair 
value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. Losses arising from the acquisition of such 
property  are  charged  against  the  allowance  for  loan  losses  at  the  time  of  acquisition. These  properties  are 
carried  at  the  lower  of  cost  or  fair  value,  less estimated costs to dispose. If fair value declines subsequent to 
foreclosure, the property is written down against expense. Costs after acquisition are expensed.

Stock Compensation Plans

Compensation  cost  is  recognized  for  stock  options  and  restricted  share  awards  issued  to  employees  and 
directors,  based  on  the  fair  value  of  these  awards  at  the  date  of  grant.  A  Black-Scholes  model  is  utilized  to 
estimate the fair value of stock options. Restricted shares awards are valued at the market value of Company 
stock  at  the  date  of  the  grant.  Compensation  cost  is  recognized  over  the  required  service  period,  generally 
defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-
line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. See Note 20.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as 
more fully disclosed in Note 22. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment 
regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets 
for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.

Transfers of Financial Assets

Transfers  of  financial  assets  are  accounted  for  as  sales,  when  control  over  the  assets  has  been  relinquished. 
Control  over  transferred  assets  is  deemed  to  be  surrendered  when  the  assets  have  been  isolated  from  the 
Company,  the  transferee  obtains  the  right  (free  of  conditions  that  constrain  it  from  taking  advantage  of  that 
right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets and the Company does not maintain effective control over the 
transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

73

- 73 -

Mortgage Banking Derivatives 

Commitments  to  fund  mortgage  loans  (interest  rate  locks)  to  be  sold  into  the  secondary  market  and  forward 
commitments for the future delivery of these mortgage loans are accounted for as free standing derivatives. Fair 
values of these mortgage derivatives are estimated based on changes in mortgage interest rates from the date the 
interest  on  the  loan  is  locked.  The  Company  enters  into  forward  commitments  for  the  future  delivery  of 
mortgage loans when interest rate locks are entered into, in order to hedge the change in interest rates resulting 
from its commitments to fund the loans. Changes in fair values of these derivatives are included in mortgage 
banking income. 

Operating Segments

Management considers the following factors in determining the need to disclose separate operating segments: 
(1) The nature of products and services, which are all financial in nature. (2) The type and class of customer for 
the products and services; in First Defiance’s case retail customers for retail bank and insurance products and 
commercial customers for commercial loan, deposit, life, health and property and casualty insurance needs. (3) 
The methods used to distribute products or provide services; such services are delivered through banking and 
insurance  offices  and  through  bank  and  insurance  customer  contact  representatives.  Retail  and  commercial 
customers  are  frequently  targets  for  both  banking  and  insurance  products.  (4)  The  nature  of  the  regulatory 
environment;  both  banking  and  insurance  entities  are  subject  to  various  regulatory  bodies  and  a  number  of 
specific regulations.

Quantitative  thresholds  as  stated  in  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board  (“FASB”)  Accounting  Standards 
Codification (“ASC”) Topic 280, Segment Reporting are monitored. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the 
reported revenue for First Insurance was 9.2% of total revenue for First Defiance. Total revenue includes net 
interest income (before provision for loan losses) plus non-interest income. Net income for First Insurance for 
the  year  ended  December  31,  2016  was 4.9%  of  consolidated  net  income.  Total  assets  of  First  Insurance  at 
December 31, 2016 were 0.6% of total assets. First Insurance does not meet any of the quantitative thresholds 
of FASB ASC Topic 280. Accordingly, all of the financial service operations are considered by management to 
be aggregated in one reportable segment.

Dividend Restriction

Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the savings 
bank to the holding company. See Note 17 for further details on restrictions.

Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments

Financial  instruments  include  off-balance  sheet  credit  instruments,  such  as  commitments  to  make  loans  and 
commercial  letters  of  credit,  issued  to  meet  customer  financing  needs. The  face  amount  for  these  items 
represents  the  exposure  to  loss,  before  considering  customer  collateral  or  ability  to  repay. Such  financial 
instruments are recorded when they are funded. 

Loss Contingencies

Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded 
as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated.
Management  does  not  believe  there  are  any  such  matters  that  will  have  a  material  effect  on  the  financial 
statements.

74

- 74 -

Income Taxes

Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax 
assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary 
differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. 
A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Realization 
of  deferred  tax  assets  is  dependent  upon  the  generation  of  a  sufficient  level  of  future  taxable  income  and 
recoverable taxes paid in prior years. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely 
than not that all of the deferred tax assets will be realized.

An effective tax rate of 35% is used to determine after-tax components of other comprehensive income (loss) 
included in the statements of stockholders’ equity.  See Note 18.

A  tax  position  is  recognized  as  a  benefit  only  if  it  is  “more  likely  than  not”  that  the  tax  position  would  be 
sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur.  The amount recognized is the 
largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions 
not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded.   

The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

Retirement Plans

Pension  expense  is  the  net  of  service  and  interest  cost,  return  on  plan  assets  and  amortization  of  gains  and 
losses  not  immediately  recognized.    Employee  401(k)  plan  expense  is  the  amount  of  matching  contributions.  
Deferred compensation and supplemental retirement plan expense allocates the benefits over years of service.
See Note 16 and 19. 

Reclassifications

Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Accounting Standards Updates

In  August  2016,  the  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board  (“FASB”)  issued  Accounting  Standard  Update 
(“ASU”) No.  2016-05  —  Statement  of  Cash  Flows  (Topic  230):  Classification  of  Certain Cash Receipts and 
Cash  Payments  (a  consensus  of  the  Emerging  Issues  Task  Force).  The  amendments  in  this  update  provide 
guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. The new guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how 
certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update are effective 
for  fiscal years  beginning  after  December  15,  2017,  and  interim  periods  within  those  fiscal  years.  Early 
adoption  is  permitted.  The  Company does  not  believe  this  standard  will  have  a  material  impact  on its
consolidated statements of cash flows.

In June 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance in ASU No. 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses 
on Financial Instruments (Topic 326). The main objective of the update is to provide financial statement users 
with  more  decision-useful  information  about  the  expected  credit  losses  on  financial  instruments  and  other 
commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. To achieve this objective, the 
amendments  in  this  update  replace  the  incurred  loss  impairment  methodology  in  current  Generally  Accepted 
Accounting Principles with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a 

75

- 75 -

broader range of reasonable and supportable information to form credit loss estimates. The amendments in this 
update become effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 
15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new accounting standard on the Company's 
consolidated financial statements.  Management’s initial review indicates it has maintained sufficient historical 
loan  data  to  support  the  requirement  of  this  pronouncement  and  is  currently  evaluating  the  various  loss 
methodologies to determine their correlations to the Company’s loan segments historical performance.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 — Leases (Topic 842). The objective of the update is to 
increase  transparency  and  comparability  among  organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities 
on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The amendments in this update 
are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal 
years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on 
its financial position and results of operations, though the Company expects that its real estate leases will be 
recognized on the consolidated balance sheet. 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01 — Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825-10): 
Recognition  and  Measurement  of  Financial  Assets  and  Financial  Liabilities.  The  amendments  in  this  update 
address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The 
ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017, and 
requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. 
Early adoption is not permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance 
on the consolidated financial statements. Management’s preliminary finding is that the new pronouncement will 
not have a significant impact on its results of operations. The pronouncement will require some revision to the 
Company’s disclosures within the consolidated financial statements and is currently evaluating the impact.

In  May  2014,  the  FASB    issued  ASU  No.  2014-09  —  Revenue  from  Contracts  with  Customers,  and 
subsequently  has  issued  five  related  accounting standard  updates  clarifying  several  aspects  of  ASU  2014-09, 
including  technical  corrections  and  improvements.  The  overall  objective  of  the  new  standards  updates  is  to 
provide  a  single,  comprehensive  revenue  recognition  model  for  all  contracts  with  customers  to  improve 
comparability  within  industries,  across  industries,  and  across  capital  markets.  The  revenue  standard  contains 
principles that will be applied to determine the measurement of revenue and timing of when it is recognized. 
The Company anticipates adopting the new standard on its effective date, January 1, 2018, though the Company 
has  not  yet  selected  whether  it  would  adopt  using  the  retrospective  approach  with  adjustments  to  each  prior 
period  or  the  retrospective  method  with  the  cumulative  effect  of  initial  application  recognized  at  the  date  of 
initial application. While the Company is continuing to assess all potential impacts this standard will have on its 
financial  position  and  results  of  operations,  early  conclusions  indicate  that  these  standards  will  not  have  a 
material  impact.  The  implementation  efforts  include  the  identification  of  revenue  within  the  scope  of  the 
guidance, as well as the evaluation of revenue contracts. 

76

- 76 -

3. Acquisitions/Subsequent Event

On August 23, 2016, First Defiance announced the execution of a definitive agreement (the “Agreement”) to 
acquire  Commercial  Bancshares,  Inc.  (“Commercial  Bancshares”)  and  its  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  the 
Commercial Savings Bank (“CSB”).  The transaction closed on February 24, 2017. The total purchase price for 
Commercial  Bancshares  was  $70.3 million,  consisting  of  $13.8 million  of  cash  and  cash  payment  to  cancel 
outstanding  options  and  the  issuance  of  1.1 million  shares  of  First  Defiance  Common  Stock  valued  at  $56.5
million.  The Company expects to record goodwill arising from the acquisition consisting largely of synergies 
and  cost  savings  resulting  from  combining  the  operations  of  the  companies.    The  amount  of  goodwill  is  not 
expected to be deductible for tax purposes.  The fair value of intangible assets and acquired assets and liabilities 
will  be  determined  as  of  the  acquisition  date  but  are  still  being  evaluated  as  of  the  date  of  these  financial 
statements.  The purpose of the acquisition is to extend the Company’s growing market area into central Ohio 
supporting the Company’s overall strategic plan. 

4. Earnings Per Common Share 

Basic  earnings  per  share  is  calculated  using  the  two-class  method.  The  two-class  method  is  an  earnings 
allocation formula under which earnings per share is calculated from common stock and participating securities 
according  to  dividends  declared  and  participation  rights  in  undistributed  earnings.  Under  this  method,  all 
earnings  distributed  and  undistributed,  are  allocated  to  participating  securities  and  common  shares  based  on 
their respective rights to receive dividends. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable 
rights  to  dividends  are  considered  participating  securities  (i.e.  unvested  restricted  stock),  not  subject  to 
performance based measures. 

 The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share:

Basic Earnings Per Share:
Net income available to common shareholders
Less: Income allocated to participating securities
Net income allocated to common shareholders

Weighted average common shares outstanding

Including participating securities

Less: Participating securities
Average common shares

2016
2014
2015
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

$

28,843
39
28,804

$

26,423
8
26,415

$

24,292
4
24,288

8,980
11
8,969

9,221
11
9,210

9,511
6
9,505

Basic earnings per common share

$

3.21

$

2.87

$

2.55

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Net income allocated to common shareholders
Weighted average common shares outstanding

for basic earnings per common share

Add: Dilutive effects of stock options
Add: Dilutive effects of warrants
Average shares and dilutive potential common 
shares

$

28,804

$

26,415

$

24,288

8,969
66
-

9,035

9,210
87
75

9,371

9,505
111
353

9,969

Diluted earnings per common share

$

3.19

$

2.82

$

2.44

77

- 77 -

Shares subject to issue upon exercise of options of 12,550 in 2016, 8,750 in 2015 and 10,500 in 2014 were 
excluded from the diluted earnings per common share calculation as they were anti-dilutive.

5. Investment Securities 

The following tables summarize the amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities and held-to-
maturity  investment  securities  at  December  31,  2016 and  2015 and  the  corresponding  amounts  of  gross 
unrealized and unrecognized gains and losses:

Amortized
Cost

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

(In Thousands)

Fair
Value

$

3,915
81,707
1,307
63,005
2
13,013

88,043
$ 250,992

Fair
Value

$          12
58
24

93
187

$

2016
Available-for-sale

Obligations of U.S. government corporations 

and agencies

Mortgage-backed securities - residential
REMICs
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Preferred stock
Corporate bonds
Obligations of state and political 

subdivisions

Total Available-for-Sale

$

4,000
82,619
1,309
63,204
-
12,919

$

-
390
-
422
2
97

86,165
$ 250,216

2,491
$ 3,402

$

(85)
(1,302)
(2)
(621)
-
(3)

(613)
$ (2,626)

Gross
Amortized Unrecognized Unrecognized
Gains

Losses

Gross

Cost

Held-to-Maturity

FHLMC certificates
FNMA certificates
GNMA certificates
Obligations of states and political 

subdivisions

Total Held-to-Maturity

(In Thousands)

$

$

12
56
23

93
184

$

$

-
2
1

-
3

$

$

-
-
-

-
-

78

- 78 -

Gross

Gross

Amortized
Cost

Unrealized Unrealized

Gains

Losses

Fair
Value

(In Thousands)

2015
Available-for-sale

Obligations of U.S. government corporations 

and agencies

Mortgage-backed securities - residential
REMICs
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Preferred stock
Corporate bonds
Obligations of state and political 

subdivisions

Total Available-for-Sale

$

3,000
63,815
1,592
71,176
-
4,955

$

1
898
28
976
1
39

$

(7)
(59)
-
(353)
-
(17)

$     2,994
64,654
1,620
71,799
1
4,977

85,680
$ 230,218

4,712
$ 6,655

(2)
(438)

$

90,390
$ 236,435

Gross
Amortized Unrecognized Unrecognized
Gains

Losses

Gross

Cost

Fair
Value

Held-to-Maturity

FHLMC certificates
FNMA certificates
GNMA certificates
Obligations of states and political 

subdivisions

Total Held-to-Maturity

(In Thousands)

$

$

14
74
31

124
243

$

$

-
2
1

-
3

$

$

-
(1)
-

-
(1)

$           14
75
32

124
$         245

The amortized cost and fair value of the investment securities portfolio at December 31, 2016 is shown below
by contractual maturity. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right 
to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. For purposes of the maturity tables
below,  mortgage-backed  securities  and  collateralized  mortgage  obligations,  which  are  not  due  at  a  single 
maturity date, have not been allocated over maturity groupings.  

2016
Available-for-sale
Due in one year or less
Due after one year through

five years

Due after five years through

ten years

Due after ten years
MBS/CMO/REMIC
Total 

Available-for-Sale
Fair
Value

Amortized
Cost

(In Thousands)

$

577

$

586

21,850

22,136

41,311
39,346
147,132
$ 250,216

42,784
39,467
146,019
$   250,992

79

- 79 -

Held-to-maturity
Due after one year through

five years

MBS
Total 

$

$

93
91
184

$

$

93
94
187

Securities pledged at year-end 2016 and 2015 had a carrying amount of $142.6 million and $134.8 million and 
were pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under repurchase agreements and FHLB advances.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company’s investment portfolio consisted of 383 securities, 117 of which were 
in an unrealized loss position.  The Company did not hold any single security that was greater than 10% of the 
Company’s equity at December 31, 2016. 

The following table summarizes First Defiance’s securities that were in an unrealized loss position at December 
31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

Duration of Unrealized Loss Position

Less than 12 Months
Gross
Unrealized
Loss

Fair
Value

12 Months or Longer
Gross
Unrealized
Loss

Fair
Value

(In Thousands)

Total

Fair
Value

Unrealized
Loses

$

3,915

$

(85)

$

63,736
1,308

28,882
-

19,172

(1,302)
(2)

(566)
-

(613)

$

-

-
-

1,227
997

-

-

-
-

(55)
(3)

-

$

3,915

$

(85)

63,736
1,308

30,110
997

19,172

(1,302)
(2)

(621)
(3)

(613)

$ 117,013

$ (2,568)

$

2,224

$

(58)

$

119,238

$   (2,626)

$

993

$

(7)

$

12,525

12,374
983

-

13

(59)

(150)
(17)

-

(1)

$

-

-

8,158
-

433

-

-

-

(203)
-

(2)

-

$

993

$

(7)

12,525

20,532
983

433

13

(59)

(353)
(17)

(2)

(1)

$

26,888

$

(234)

$

8,591

$

(205)

$

35,479

$   (439)

At December 31, 2016
Available-for-sale securities:

Obligations of U.S. government 
corporations and agencies
Mortgage-backed securities-

residential

REMICs
Collateralized mortgage 

obligations
Corporate bonds
Obligations of state and political 

subdivisions

Total temporarily impaired 

securities

At December 31, 2015
Available-for-sale securities:

Obligations of U.S. government 
corporations and agencies
Mortgage-backed securities-

residential

Collateralized mortgage 

obligations
Corporate bonds
Obligations of state and political 

subdivisions

Held to maturity securities:

FNMA certificates

Total temporarily impaired 

securities

Management evaluates securities for OTTI on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or 
market conditions warrant such an evaluation. The investment portfolio is evaluated for OTTI by segregating 
the portfolio into two general segments. Investment securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity 
are  generally  evaluated  for  OTTI  under  FASB  ASC  Topic  320.  Certain  collateralized  debt  obligations 
(“CDOs”) are evaluated for OTTI under FASB ASC Topic 325, Investment – Other.

80

- 80 -

When OTTI occurs under either model, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an 
entity intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of 
its amortized cost basis less any current period credit loss. If an entity intends to sell or more likely than not will 
be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period credit loss, the 
OTTI  shall  be  recognized  in  earnings  equal  to  the  entire  difference  between  the  investment’s  amortized  cost 
basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not 
more  likely  than  not  that  the  entity  will  be  required  to  sell  the  security before recovery of its amortized cost 
basis less any current period loss, the OTTI shall be separated into the amount representing the credit loss and 
the amount related to all other factors. The amount of OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the 
present  value  of  cash  flows  expected  to  be  collected  compared  to  the  book  value  of  the  security  and  is 
recognized in earnings. The amount of OTTI related to other factors shall be recognized in other comprehensive 
income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings shall 
become the new amortized cost basis of the investment.

With the exception of corporate bonds, the securities all have fixed interest rates, and all securities have defined 
maturities. Their fair value is sensitive to movements in market interest rates. First Defiance has the ability and 
intent  to  hold  these  investments  for  a  time  necessary  to  recover  the  amortized  cost  without  impacting  its 
liquidity position and it is not more than likely that the Company will be required to sell the investments before 
anticipated recovery. 

In 2016, 2015 and 2014, management determined there was no OTTI.  In 2013, management determined that 
two CDOs had OTTI because they were disallowed under the Final Interim Volcker Rule of the Dodd-Frank 
Act released on January 14, 2014.  The Company sold these two securities on January 15, 2014.   

There was no OTTI recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) relating to the CDOs at 
December 31, 2016 and 2015.   

The table below presents a roll-forward of the credit losses relating to debt securities recognized in earnings for 
the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (In Thousands):   

Beginning balance, January 1

Additions for amounts related to credit loss for which an OTTI   

was not previously recognized

Reductions for amounts realized for securities sold/redeemed during the 
period

2016

$

Ending balance, December 31

$

2015
$

$

2014
$      3,513

-

(3,513)

$

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Realized gains from the sales and calls of investment securities totaled $509,000 ($331,000 after tax) in 2016 
while there were realized gains of $22,000 ($15,000 after tax) and $932,000 ($652,000 after tax) in 2015 and 
2014, respectively.

The proceeds from sales and calls of securities and the associated gains and losses are listed below:

Proceeds
Gross realized gains
Gross realized losses

2016

2015
(In Thousands)

2014

$

$ 14,871
509
-

426
22
-

$ 14,913
1,574
(642)

81

- 81 -

6. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Loan Commitments
Loan commitments are made to accommodate the financial needs of First Federal’s customers. Standby letters 
of credit commit the Company to make payments on behalf of customers when certain specified future events 
occur. They primarily are issued to facilitate customers’ trade transactions. 

Both arrangements have credit risk, essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers, and 
are  subject  to  the  Company’s  normal  credit  policies.  Collateral  (e.g.,  securities,  receivables,  inventory  and 
equipment) is obtained based on management’s credit assessment of the customer. 

The Company’s maximum obligation to extend credit for loan commitments (unfunded loans and unused lines 
of credit) and standby letters of credit outstanding on December 31 was as follows (In Thousands):

2016

2015

Commitments to make loans
Unused lines of credit
Standby letters of credit
Total

Fixed Rate
34,432
14,384
-
48,816

$

$

Variable Rate
$

106,356
400,542
9,668
516,566

$

Fixed Rate
80,862
31,991
-
112,853

$

$

Variable Rate
76,253
$
323,171
19,632
419,056

$

Commitments  to  make  loans  are  generally  made  for  periods  of  60  days  or  less.    The  fixed  rate  loan 
commitments at December 31, 2016 had interest rates ranging from 2.63% to 18.00% and maturities ranging 
from less than 1 year to 30 years.

In  addition  to  the  above  commitments,  at  December  31,  2016, First Defiance had commitments to sell $22.5
million of loans to Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, FHLB of Cincinnati or BB&T Mortgage. 

82

- 82 -

7. Loans 

Loans receivable consist of the following:

Real Estate:

Secured by 1-4 family residential
Secured by multi-family residential
Secured by commercial real estate
Construction 

Other Loans:

Commercial
Home equity and improvement
Consumer Finance

Total loans
Deduct:

December 31,
2016

December 31,
2015

(In Thousands)

$

207,550
196,983
843,579
182,886
1,430,998

469,055
118,429
16,680
604,164
2,035,162

$

205,330
167,558
780,870
163,877
1,317,635

419,349
116,962
16,281
552,592
1,870,227

Undisbursed loan funds
Net deferred loan origination fees and costs
Allowance for loan loss
Totals

(93,355)
(1,320)
(25,884)
$ 1,914,603

(66,902)
(1,108)
(25,382)
$ 1,776,835

Loan segments have been identified by evaluating the portfolio based on collateral and credit risk characteristics.  

The following table discloses the year-to-date activity in the allowance for loan loss for the dates indicated by 
portfolio segment (In Thousands):  

Year to Date December 31, 
2016

1-4 Family 
Residential 
Real Estate 

Multi- Family 
Residential 
Real Estate

Commercial 
Real Estate

Construction

Commercial 

Home Equity 
and 
Improvement 

Consumer 
Finance

Total

Beginning Allowance

$      3,212

$       2,151

$       11,772

$            517

$     5,255

$     2,304

$          171

$   25,382

Charge-Offs

Recoveries

Provisions

(350)

166

(401)

-

-

(92)

923

-

-

77

(1,978)

(67)

(615)

(268)

(94)

(1,419)

335

2,386

150

200

64

66

1,638

283

Ending Allowance 

$       2,627

$       2,228

$       10,625

$          450

$     7,361

$      2,386

$          207

$   25,884

Year to Date December 31, 
2015

1-4 Family 
Residential 
Real Estate 

Multi- Family 
Residential 
Real Estate

Commercial 
Real Estate

Construction

Commercial 

Home Equity 
and 
Improvement 

Consumer 
Finance

Total

Beginning Allowance

$      2,494

$      2,453

$       11,268

$            221

$     6,509

$      1,704

$          117

$   24,766

Charge-Offs

(283)

(114)

(353)

Recoveries

Provisions

214

787

-

(188)

915

(58)

-

-

(68)

331

296

(1,517)

(350)

(53)

(1,221)

188

762

53

54

1,701

136

Ending Allowance 

$       3,212

$       2,151

$       11,772

$          517

$     5,255

$      2,304

$          171

$   25,382

83

- 83 -

Year to Date December 31, 
2014

1-4 Family 
Residential 
Real Estate 

Multi- Family 
Residential 
Real Estate

Commercial 
Real Estate

Construction

Commercial 

Home Equity 
and 
Improvement

Consumer 
Finance

Total

Beginning Allowance

$      2,847

$       2,508 

$       12,000 

$            134

$     5,678 

$      1,635 

$          148

$   24,950

Charge-Offs

Recoveries

Provisions

(426) 

188

(115) 

-

7

(1,018) 

2,670 

-

-

(62)

(2,384) 

87 

3,378  

435   

193  

268  

65  

3,558 

(55)

1,117 

(2,982)   

(392)  

(41)   

(4,859) 

Ending Allowance 

$       2,494

$       2,453

$       11,268 

$          221

$     6,509

$      1,704 

$          117

$   24,766

84

- 84 -

f
o

s
a
d
o
h
t
e
m

t
n
e
m

r
i
a
p
m

i

n
o
d
e
s
a
b
d
n
a

t
n
e
m
g
e
s

o
i
l
o
f
t
r
o
p
y
b

s
n
a
o
l

n
i

t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i

d
e
d
r
o
c
e
r

e
h
t

d
n
a

s
e
s
s
o
l
n
a
o
l

r
o
f

e
c
n
a
w
o
l
l
a

e
h
t

n
i

e
c
n
a
l
a
b

e
h
t

s
t
n
e
s
e
r
p

e
l
b
a
t
g
n
i
w
o
l
l
o
f

e
h
T

)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
T
n
I
(

:
6
1
0
2

,
1
3

r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D

l
a
t
o
T

e
c
n
a
n
i
F

r
e
m
u
s
n
o
C

y
t
i
u
q
E
e
m
o
H

t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

&

l
a
i
c
r
e
m
m
o
C

n
o
i
t
c
u
r
t
s
n
o
C

l
a
i
c
r
e
m
m
o
C

e
t
a
t
s
E

l
a
e
R

y
l
i

m
a
F

i
t
l
u
M

l
a
i
t
n
e
d
i
s
e
R

e
t
a
t
s
E

l
a
e
R

y
l
i

m
a
F
4
-
1

l
a
i
t
n
e
d
i
s
e
R

e
t
a
t
s
E

l
a
e
R

9
0
8

$

-

$

3
1
3

$

5
3

$

-

$

5
5
2

$

4

$

2
0
2

$

t
n
e
m

r
i
a
p
m

i

r
o
f

d
e
t
a
u
l
a
v
e
y
l
l
a
u
d
i
v
i
d
n
 I

5
7
0
,
5
2

7
0
2

3
7
0
,
2

6
2
3
,
7

0
5
4

0
7
3
,
0
1

4
2
2
,
2

5
2
4
,
2

t
n
e
m

r
i
a
p
m

i

r
o
f

d
e
t
a
u
l
a
v
e
y
l
e
v
i
t
c
e
l
l
o
C

:
s
n
a
o
l

o
t

e
l
b
a
t
u
b
i
r
t
t
a

e
c
n
a
l
a
b

e
c
n
a
w
o
l
l
a
g
n
i
d
n
E

:
s
e
s
s
o
l
n
a
o
l

r
o
f

e
c
n
a
w
o
l
l

A

-

-

-

4
8
8
,
5
2

$

7
0
2

$

6
8
3
,
2

3
3
4
,
7
2

$

9
5

$

9
6
2
,
1

$

$

-

1
6
3
,
7

4
5
1

,
2

$

$

-

0
5
4

$

-

5
2
6
,
0
1

$

8
2
2
,
2

-

-

$

0
7
5
,
3
1
$

3
8
4
,
3

$

$

-

8
9
8
,
6

$

t
n
e
m

r
i
a
p
m

i

r
o
f

d
e
t
a
u
l
a
v
e
y
l
l
a
u
d
i
v
i
d
n
i

7
2
6
,
2

$

e
c
n
a
l
a
b

e
c
n
a
w
o
l
l
a
g
n
i
d
n
e

l
a
t
o
T

y
t
i
l
a
u
q

t
i
d
e
r
c

d
e
t
a
r
o
i
r
e
t
e
d
h
t
i

w
d
e
r
i
u
q
c
A

6
2
9
,
8
1
9
,
1

5
2
6
,
6
1

4
4
7
,
7
1
1

6
4
2
,
8
6
4

4
4
2
,
9
8

6
4
4
,
2
3
8

4
1
7
,
3
9
1

7
0
9
,
0
0
2

t
n
e
m

r
i
a
p
m

i

r
o
f

d
e
t
a
u
l
a
v
e
y
l
e
v
i
t
c
e
l
l
o
c

1
1

-

-

1
1

-

-

-

-

y
t
i
l
a
u
q

t
i
d
e
r
c

d
e
t
a
r
o
i
r
e
t
e
d
h
t
i

w
d
e
r
i
u
q
c
a

0
7
3
,
6
4
9
,
1

$

4
8
6
,
6
1

$

3
1
0
,
9
1
1

$

1
1
4
,
0
7
4

$

4
4
2
,
9
8

$

6
1
0
,
6
4
8

$

7
9
1
,
7
9
1

$

5
0
8
,
7
0
2

$

e
c
n
a
l
a
b
s
n
a
o
l
g
n
i
d
n
e

l
a
t
o
 T

5
8

s
n
a
o
 L

s
n
a
o
 L

s
n
a
o
 L

:
s
n
a
o
L

- 85 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f
o

s
a
d
o
h
t
e
m

t
n
e
m

r
i
a
p
m

i
n
o

d
e
s
a
b
d
n
a

t
n
e
m
g
e
s

o
i
l
o
f
t
r
o
p
y
b

s
n
a
o
l

n
i

t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i

d
e
d
r
o
c
e
r

e
h
t

d
n
a

s
e
s
s
o
l
n
a
o
l

r
o
f

e
c
n
a
w
o
l
l
a

e
h
t

n
i

e
c
n
a
l
a
b

e
h
t

s
t
n
e
s
e
r
p

e
l
b
a
t
g
n
i
w
o
l
l
o
f

e
h
T

)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
T
n
I
(

:
5
1
0
2

,
1
3

r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D

l
a
t
o
T

e
c
n
a
n
i
F

r
e
m
u
s
n
o
C

y
t
i
u
q
E
e
m
o
H

t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

&

l
a
i
c
r
e
m
m
o
C

n
o
i
t
c
u
r
t
s
n
o
C

l
a
i
c
r
e
m
m
o
C

e
t
a
t
s
E

l
a
e
R

y
l
i

m
a
F

i
t
l
u
M

l
a
i
t
n
e
d
i
s
e
R

e
t
a
t
s
E

l
a
e
R

y
l
i

m
a
F
4
-
1

l
a
i
t
n
e
d
i
s
e
R

e
t
a
t
s
E

l
a
e
R

7
3
4

$

-

$

4
3

$

3
6

$

-

$

9
3
1

$

-

$

1
0
2

$

t
n
e
m

r
i
a
p
m

i

r
o
f

d
e
t
a
u
l
a
v
e
y
l
l
a
u
d
i
v
i
d
n
 I

5
4
9
,
4
2

1
7
1

0
7
2
,
2

2
9
1
,
5

7
1
5

3
3
6
,
1
1

1
5
1
,
2

1
1
0
,
3

t
n
e
m

r
i
a
p
m

i

r
o
f

d
e
t
a
u
l
a
v
e
y
l
e
v
i
t
c
e
l
l
o
C

:
s
n
a
o
l

o
t

e
l
b
a
t
u
b
i
r
t
t
a

e
c
n
a
l
a
b

e
c
n
a
w
o
l
l
a
g
n
i
d
n
E

:
s
e
s
s
o
l
n
a
o
l

r
o
f

e
c
n
a
w
o
l
l

A

-

-

-

2
8
3
,
5
2

$

1
7
1

$

4
0
3
,
2

9
4
0
,
2
4

$

1
7

$

1
9
4
,
1

$

$

-

5
5
2

,
5

7
0
1

,
6

$

$

-

7
1
5

$

-

2
7
7
,
1
1

$

1
5
1
,
2

-

-

$

3
9
4
,
3
2
$

3
1
3
,
3

$

$

-

4
7
5
,
7

$

t
n
e
m

r
i
a
p
m

i

r
o
f

d
e
t
a
u
l
a
v
e
y
l
l
a
u
d
i
v
i
d
n
i

2
1
2
,
3

$

e
c
n
a
l
a
b

e
c
n
a
w
o
l
l
a
g
n
i
d
n
e

l
a
t
o
T

y
t
i
l
a
u
q

t
i
d
e
r
c

d
e
t
a
r
o
i
r
e
t
e
d
h
t
i

w
d
e
r
i
u
q
c
A

7
1
3
,
5
6
7
,
1

9
9
1
,
6
1

7
7
9
,
5
1
1

7
2
5
,
4
1
4

5
4
8
,
6
9

1
8
2
,
9
5
7

2
8
3
,
4
6
1

6
0
1
,
8
9
1

t
n
e
m

r
i
a
p
m

i

r
o
f

d
e
t
a
u
l
a
v
e
y
l
e
v
i
t
c
e
l
l
o
c

9
6
1

-

-

6
1

-

3
5
1

-

-

y
t
i
l
a
u
q

t
i
d
e
r
c

d
e
t
a
r
o
i
r
e
t
e
d
h
t
i

w
d
e
r
i
u
q
c
a

5
3
5
,
7
0
8
,
1

$

0
7
2
,
6
1

$

8
6
4
,
7
1
1

$

0
5
6
,
0
2
4

$

5
4
8
,
6
9

$

7
2
9
,
2
8
7

$

5
9
6
,
7
6
1

$

0
8
6
,
5
0
2

$

e
c
n
a
l
a
b
s
n
a
o
l
g
n
i
d
n
e

l
a
t
o
 T

6
8

s
n
a
o
 L

s
n
a
o
 L

s
n
a
o
 L

:
s
n
a
o
L

- 86 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  following  tables  presents  the  average  balance,  interest  income  recognized  and  cash  basis  income 
recognized  on  impaired  loans  by  class  of  loans  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2016,  2015  and  2014
(In Thousands): 

Twelve Months Ended December 31, 
2016
Interest 
Income 
Recognized

Cash Basis 
Income 
Recognized

Average 
Balance

Residential Owner 
Occupied
Residential Non 
Owner Occupied
Total 1-4 Family 
Residential Real 
Estate
Multi-Family 
Residential Real 
Estate 
CRE Owner Occupied
CRE Non Owner 
Occupied
Agriculture Land
Other CRE

Total Commercial 
Real Estate

Construction
Commercial Working 
Capital
Commercial Other
Total Commercial
Home Equity and 
Home Improvement
Consumer Finance
Total Impaired 
Loans

$ 

3,954

$ 

244

$ 

237

3,133

7,087

3,946

6,925

5,351

2,283
1,632

16,191
-

1,606

2,393
3,999

1,543

67

211

455

124

203

411

128
71

813
-

109

81
190

85

8

210

447

123

183

407

68
70

728
-

90

79
169

83

8

$ 32,833 

$ 1,675

$1,558

- 87 - 

- 87 -

  
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 
2015
Interest 
Income 
Recognized

Cash Basis 
Income 
Recognized

Average 
Balance

Residential Owner 
Occupied
Residential Non 
Owner Occupied
Total 1-4 Family 
Residential Real 
Estate
Multi-Family 
Residential Real 
Estate 
CRE Owner Occupied
CRE Non Owner 
Occupied
Agriculture Land
Other CRE

Total Commercial 
Real Estate

Construction
Commercial Working 
Capital
Commercial Other
Total Commercial
Home Equity and 
Home Improvement
Consumer Finance
Total Impaired 
Loans

$ 

6,985

$ 

246

$ 

244

5,444

12,429

3,799

9,019

10,125

2,980
3,554

25,678
50

2,217

4,773
6,990

2,757

80

152

398

40

168

349

88
81

686
2

58

49
107

62

14

152

396

40

167

348

56
80

651
2

56

49
115

62

14

$  51,783

$ 1,309

$1,270

- 88 - 

- 88 -

Twelve Months Ended December 31, 
2014
Interest 
Income 
Recognized

Cash Basis 
Income 
Recognized

Average 
Balance

Residential Owner 
Occupied
Residential Non 
Owner Occupied
Total 1-4 Family 
Residential Real 
Estate
Multi-Family 
Residential Real 
Estate 
CRE Owner Occupied
CRE Non Owner 
Occupied
Agriculture Land
Other CRE

Total Commercial 
Real Estate

Construction
Commercial Working 
Capital
Commercial Other
Total Commercial
Home Equity and 
Home Improvement
Consumer Finance
Total Impaired 
Loans

$ 

6,177

$ 

317

$ 

313

3,920

10,097

903

8,906

18,164

611
1,694

29,375
233

2,790

4,576
7,366

2,233

47

143

460

143

456

4 

4 

145

807

14
20

986
12

29

14
43

95

3

142

809

14
22

987
15

29

12
41

94

3

$  50,254

$ 1,603

$ 1,600

- 89 - 
- 89 -

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans (In 
Thousands): 

December 31, 2016 

December 31, 2015 

Unpaid
Principal
Balance*

Recorded 
Investment

Allowance 
for Loan 
Losses 
Allocated

Unpaid
Principal
Balance*

Allowance 
for Loan 
Losses 
Allocated

Recorded 
Investment

$      1,383
2,147

3,530

$   1,360
2,141
3,501

$

-
-
-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

3,313
4,520
7,685
3,596
4,046
19,847
-
1,648
3,607
5,255
772
59
$  32,747

$

$    2,837
1,236
4,073

$      188
13
201

-
2,767
308
69
502
3,646
-
596
256
852
719
12

$  9,302  

-
132
2
2
3
139
-
62
1
63
34
-
$     437

3,463
4,869
7,932
3,546
4,076
20,423
-
1,644
3,573
5,217
817
60
$   33,510

$     2,918
1,231
4,149

-
3,250
385
68
926
4,629
-
594
252
846
724
12
$   10,360

With no allowance recorded:
Residential Owner Occupied
Residential Non Owner Occupied
Total 1-4 Family Residential Real 
Estate
Multi-Family Residential Real Estate
CRE Owner Occupied
CRE Non Owner Occupied
Agriculture Land
Other CRE
Total Commercial Real Estate
Construction
Commercial Working Capital
Commercial Other
Total Commercial  
Home Equity and Home Improvement
Consumer Finance
Total loans with no allowance recorded

With an allowance recorded:
Residential Owner Occupied
Residential Non Owner Occupied
Total 1-4 Family Residential Real 
Estate
Multi-Family Residential Real Estate
CRE Owner Occupied
CRE Non Owner Occupied
Agriculture Land
Other CRE
Total Commercial Real Estate
Construction
Commercial Working Capital
Commercial Other
Total Commercial  
Home Equity and Home Improvement
Consumer Finance
Total loans with an allowance recorded

* Presented gross of charge offs

$

1,912
1,691
3,603

$

1,765
1,683
3,448

$

3,578
2,652
4,372
1,695
1,225
9,944
-
838
1,179
2,017
631
55
$ 19,828

3,430
2,353
4,240
1,722
1,115
9,430
-
786
967
1,753
585
55
$ 18,701

$     2,348
1,137
3,485

$    2,319
1,131
3,450

53
2,362
1,618
45
1,144
5,169
-
230
167
397
688
4
$ 9,796

53
1,894
1,479
45
722
4,140
-
231
170
401
684
4
$ 8,732

$

$

$

-
-
-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

157
45
202

4
102
108
3
42
255
-
24
11
35
313
-
809

- 90 - 

- 90 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  following  table  presents  the  current  balance  of  the  aggregate  amounts  of  non-performing  assets, 
comprised of non-performing loans and real estate owned on the dates indicated:  

Non-accrual loans
Loans over 90 days past due and still accruing
Total non-performing loans
Real estate and other assets held for sale
Total non-performing assets

December 31,
2016

December 31, 
2015

(In Thousands)

$ 14,348
-
14,348
455
$ 14,803

$ 16,261
-
16,261
1,321
$ 17,582

Troubled debt restructuring, still accruing

$ 10,544

$ 11,178

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due and non-accrual loans as of 
December 31, 2016 by class of loans (In Thousands): 

Current

30-59 days

60-89 days

90+ days

Total 
Past Due

Total Non 
Accrual

Residential Owner Occupied
Residential Non Owner Occupied

$  139,015
66,811

$ 56
166

$

842
308

$

544
63

$      1,442
537

$     1,931
992

Total 1-4 Family Residential Real 
Estate

205,826

222

1,150

607 

1,979

2,923

Multi-Family Residential Real Estate

197,197

CRE Owner Occupied
CRE Non Owner Occupied
Agriculture Land
Other Commercial Real Estate

340,233
338,724
102,397
62,415

-

79
81
-
-

Total Commercial Real Estate

843,769

160

Construction

Commercial Working Capital
Commercial Other

Total Commercial

Home Equity and Home Improvement

Consumer Finance

89,244

202,786
267,189

469,975

117,458
16,452

-

-
23

23

1,125
85

176
69

-

-
16
-
-

16

-

10
-

10

-

-

2,637

1,396
426
-
249

1,475
523
-
249

3,098
1,808
755
1,292

2,071

2,247

6,953

-

38
365

403

254
78

-

48
388

436

1,555
232

-

435
577

1,012

730
91

Total Loans

$  1,939,921

$ 1,615

$ 1,421

$ 3,413

$ 6,449

$ 14,346

- 91 - 

- 91 -

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due and non-accrual loans as of 
December 31, 2015 by class of loans:  (In Thousands) 

Current

30-59 days

60-89 days

90+ days

Total 
Past Due

Total Non 
Accrual

Residential Owner Occupied
Residential Non Owner Occupied

$  138,974
64,577

$ 159
324

$

673
356

$

391
226

$      1,223
906

$     1,428
1,179

Total 1-4 Family Residential Real 
Estate

203,551

Multi-Family Residential Real Estate

165,671

CRE Owner Occupied
CRE Non Owner Occupied
Agriculture Land
Other Commercial Real Estate

Total Commercial Real Estate

Construction

Commercial Working Capital
Commercial Other

Total Commercial

Home Equity and Home Improvement

Consumer Finance

322,940
304,166
98,055
53,494

778,655

96,845

168,938
249,070

418,008

116,599
16,216

483

-

772
-
57
-

829

-

16
203

219

733
27

1,029

617

2,129

2,607

-

2,024

2,024

2,417

1,218
106
-
-

1,266
538
-
315

3,256
644
57
315

4,141
1,229
695
1,364

1,324

2,119

4,272

7,429

-

-
46

46

92
3

-

-

-

154
2,223

170
2,472

251
2,833

2,377

2,642

3,084

44
24

869
54

689
36

Total Loans

$  1,795,545

$   2,291

$ 2,494

$  7,205

$  11,990

$ 16,262

Troubled Debt Restructurings

As  of  December  31,  2016 and  2015,  the  Company  had a  recorded  investment  in  troubled  debt 
restructurings  (“TDRs”)  of  $16.8 million  and  $17.6 million,  respectively.    The  Company  allocated 
$809,000 and  $335,000,  of  specific  reserves  to  those  loans  at  December  31,  2016 and  2015,  and 
committed  to  lend  additional  amounts  totaling  up  to  $20,000  and  $48,000 at  December  31,  2016  and 
2015.

The  Company  offers  various  types  of  concessions  when  modifying  a  loan,  however,  forgiveness  of 
principal is rarely granted.  Each TDR is uniquely designed to meet the specific needs of the borrower.  
Commercial  and  industrial  loans  modified  in  a  TDR  often  involve  temporary  interest-only  payments, 
term  extensions,  and  converting  revolving  credit  lines  to  term  loans.    Additional  collateral  or  an 
additional  guarantor  is  often  requested  when  granting  a  concession.    Commercial  mortgage  loans 
modified in a TDR often involve temporary interest-only payments, re-amortization of remaining debt in 
order  to  lower  payments,  and  sometimes  reducing  the  interest  rate  lower  than  the  current  market  rate.  
Residential  mortgage  loans  modified  in  a  TDR  are  comprised  of  loans  where  monthly  payments  are 
lowered,  either  through  interest  rate  reductions  or  principal  only  payments  for  a  period  of  time,  to 
accommodate  the  borrowers’  financial  needs,  interest  is  capitalized  into  principal,  or  the  term  and 
amortization  are  extended.    Home  equity  modifications  are  made  infrequently  and  usually  involve 

- 92 - 

- 92 -

providing an interest rate that is lower than the borrower would be able to obtain due to credit issues.  All 
retail  loans  where  the borrower is in bankruptcy are classified as TDRs regardless of whether or not a 
concession is made.

Of the loans modified in a TDR, $6.2 million are on non-accrual status and partial charge-offs have in 
some cases been taken against the outstanding balance.  Loans modified as a TDR may have the financial 
effect  of  increasing  the  allowance  associated  with  the  loan.    If  the  loan  is  determined  to  be  collateral 
dependent, the estimated fair value of the collateral, less any selling costs is used to determine if there is 
a need for a specific allowance or charge-off.  If the loan is determined to be cash flow dependent, the 
allowance is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s 
pre-modification effective interest rate.

The following table presents loans by class modified as TDRs that occurred during the years indicated
(Dollars in Thousands): 

Loans Modified as a TDR for the
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2016

Loans Modified as a TDR for the 
Twelve Months Ended 
December 31, 2015

Loans Modified as a TDR for the 
Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2014

Number of 
Loans

Recorded 
Investment (as of 
period end)

Number of 
Loans

Recorded 
Investment (as 
of period end)

Number of 
Loans

Recorded 
Investment (as of 
period end)

TDRs

Residential Owner Occupied

17

Residential  Non Owner Occupied

Multi Family

CRE Owner Occupied

CRE Non Owner Occupied

Agriculture Land

Other CRE

Commercial Working Capital

Commercial Other
Home Equity and Home 
Improvement

Consumer Finance

Total

5

2

-

5

1

1

1

1

9

2

$      778

494

1,885

-

974

45

348

226

587

281

14

6

4

-

2

2

3

-

2

2

13

9

43

$      454

18

$      1,726

59

-

645

244

1,443

-

62

70

324

62

$  3,363

3

-

2

3

-

-

4

16

17

4

67

517

-

27

403

-

-

1,353

2,020

471

15

$  6,532

44

$  5,632

The loans described above increased the allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) by $413,000 for the year 
ended December 31, 2016, decreased the ALLL by $13,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, and 
increased the ALLL by $234,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014. 

Of the 2016 modifications, fifteen were made TDRs due to the fact that the borrower filed bankruptcy, 
one was made a TDR due to an interest only period, six were made a TDR due to extending the maturity,
five were made TDRs due to advancing or renewing funds to a watchlist credit, two were made TDRs to 
term out lines of credit, and fifteen were made TDRs to refinance current debt for payment relief.

- 93 - 

- 93 -

The following table presents loans by class modified as TDRs for which there was a payment default 
within twelve months following the modification during the indicated: 

Twelve Months Ended 
December 31, 2016 
($ in thousands)

Twelve Months Ended 
December 31, 2015 
($ in thousands)

Twelve Months Ended 
December 31, 2014 
($ in thousands)

TDRs
That Subsequently Defaulted:

Number of 
Loans

Recorded 
Investment 
(as of Period 
End)

Number of 
Loans

Residential Owner Occupied

Residential Non Owner Occupied

CRE Owner Occupied

CRE Non Owner Occupied

Agriculture Land

Other CRE

Commercial Working Capital

Commercial  Other
Home Equity and  Home 
Improvement

Consumer

Total

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

$      -

-

-

205

-

-

-

-

-

-

$  205

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

5

1

-

7

Recorded 
Investment 
(as of Period 
End)

$      -

-

-

-

-

-

120

1,791

22

-

$  1,933

Number of 
Loans

1

1

-

-

-

-

2

5

-

-

9

Recorded 
Investment 
(as of Period 
End)

$      80

178

-

-

-

-

868

865

-

-

$  1,991

The  TDRs  that  subsequently  defaulted  described  above had  no  effect  on  the  ALLL  for the year ended 
December 31, 2016 and 2015.  They decreased the ALLL by $14,000 after $176,000 in charge-offs for 
the year ended December 31, 2014.  

A default for purposes of this disclosure is a TDR loan in which the borrower is 90 days contractually 
past due under the modified terms. 

The terms of certain other loans were modified during the periods ending December 31, 2016 and 2015
that did not meet the definition of a TDR.  The modification of these loans involved a modification of the 
terms of a loan to borrowers who were not experiencing financial difficulties.  A total of 373 loans were
modified under this definition during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2016 and a total of 
187 loans were modified under this definition during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2015. 

In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed 
regarding  the  probability  that  the  borrower  will  be  in  payment  default  on  any  of  its  debt  in  the 
foreseeable future without the modification. 

Credit Quality Indicators

Loans are categorized into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to 
service  their  debt  such  as:    current  financial  information,  historical  payment  experience,  credit 
documentation,  public  information,  and  current  economic  trends,  among  other  factors.    Loans  are 
analyzed  individually  by  classifying  the  loans  as  to  credit  risk.    This  analysis  includes  all  non-
homogeneous  loans,  such  as  commercial  and  commercial  real  estate  loans  and  certain  homogenous 
mortgage,  home  equity  and  consumer  loans.  This  analysis  is  performed  on  a  quarterly  basis.  First 
Defiance uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Special Mention.   Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves 
management's  close  attention.  If  left  uncorrected,  these  potential  weaknesses  may  result  in 
deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution's credit position at some 
future date.

- 94 - 
- 94 -

Substandard.  Loans  classified  as  substandard  are  inadequately  protected  by  the  current  net 
worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified 
have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are 
characterized  by  the  distinct  possibility  that  the  institution  will  sustain  some  loss  if  the 
deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful. Loans  classified  as  doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as 
substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in 
full,  on  the  basis  of  currently  existing  facts,  conditions,  and  values,  highly  questionable  and 
improbable. 

Not Graded.  Loans classified as not graded are generally smaller balance residential real estate, 
home  equity  and  consumer  installment  loans  which  are  originated  primarily  by  using  an 
automated  underwriting  system.    These  loans  are  monitored  based  on  their  delinquency  status 
and are evaluated individually only if they are seriously delinquent. 

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process
are considered to be pass rated loans.  As of December 31, 2016, and based on the most recent analysis 
performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows (In Thousands):

Class

Special 

Pass

Mention Substandard Doubtful

Residential Owner Occupied
Residential Non Owner Occupied

Total 1-4 Family Real Estate

$

$

5,980
58,041

64,021

Multi-Family Residential Real Estate

192,369

CRE Owner Occupied
CRE Non Owner Occupied
Agriculture Land
Other CRE

316,335
332,196
98,039
59,561

$

402
1,394

1,796

862

20,559
1,617
2,355
60

$

1,824
3,480

5,304

3,852

4,430
5,435
2,002
2,297

Total Commercial Real Estate

806,131

24,591

14,164

Construction

67,751

706

-

Commercial Working Capital
Commercial Other

193,043
262,076

8,301
3,749

1,490
1,752

Total Commercial

455,119

12,050

3,242

Home Equity and Home Improvement

Consumer Finance

-
-

-
-

696
90

Total Loans

$  1,585,391

$ 40,005

$ 27,348

$

-
-

- 

-

-
-
-
-

-

-

-
-

-

-
-

-

Not 
Graded

Total

$  132,250
4,434

$   140,456
67,349

136,684

207,805

114

384
-
-
746

197,197

341,708
339,248
102,396
62,664

1,130

846,016

20,787

89,244

-
-

-

118,317
16,594

202,834
267,577

470,411

119,013
16,684

$  293,626

$ 1,946,370

- 95 - 
- 95 -

As of December 31, 2015, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by 
class of loans is as follows (In Thousands): 

Class

Special 

Pass

Mention Substandard Doubtful

Residential Owner Occupied
Residential Non Owner Occupied

$

5,828
55,169

$          123
1,420

$

Total 1-4 Family Real Estate

60,997

1,543

Multi-Family Residential Real Estate

163,405

498

CRE Owner Occupied
CRE Non Owner Occupied
Agriculture Land
Other CRE

297,856
293,057
92,262
47,109

17,896
2,143
1,947
469

$

2,427
4,439

6,866

3,675

9,730
9,595
3,903
5,739

Total Commercial Real Estate

730,284

22,455

28,967

Construction

76,152

2,159

-

Commercial Working Capital
Commercial Other

163,071
243,308

2,497
2,706

3,540
5,528

Total Commercial

406,379

5,203

9,068

Home Equity and Home Improvement

Consumer Finance

-
-

-
-

689
15

Total Loans

$  1,437,217

$ 31,858

$   49,280

$

-
-

- 

-

-
-
-
-

-

-

-
-

-

-
-

-

Not 
Graded

Total 

$  131,820
4,454

$   140,198
65,482

136,274

205,680

117

714
15
-
492

167,695

326,196
304,810
98,112
53,809

1,221

782,927

18,534

96,845

-
-

-

116,779
16,255

169,108
251,542

420,650

117,468
16,270

$  289,180

$ 1,807,535

- 96 - 
- 96 -

Certain  loans  acquired  had  evidence  that  the  credit  quality  of  the  loan  had  deteriorated  since  its 
origination and in management’s assessment at the acquisition date it was probable that First Defiance 
would be unable to collect all contractually required payments due. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 
310 Subtopic 30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, these loans have 
been recorded based on management’s estimate of the fair value of the loans. Details of these loans are as 
follows: 

Balance at January 1, 2014
Principal payments received
Loans charged off
Additional provision for loan loss
Loan accretion recorded
Balance at December 31, 2014
Principal payments received
Loans charged off
Additional provision for loan loss
Loan accretion recorded
Balance at December 31, 2015
Principal payments received
Loans charged off
Additional provision for loan loss
Loan accretion recorded
Balance at December 31, 2016

Contractual 
Amount 
Receivable

$

503

(90)
-
-
-
413
(51)
-
-
-
362
(261)
(35)
-
-
66

$

$

Impairment 
Discount
(In Thousands)
273
-
-
-
(46)
227
-
-
-
(34)
193
-
(35)
-
(103)
55

$

Recorded 
Loan 
Receivable

$

$

230
(90)
-
-
46
186
(51)
-
-
34
169
(261)
-
-
103
11

Loans to executive officers, directors, and their affiliates are as follows:

Years Ended December 31
2015

2016
(In Thousands)
7,349
4,783
12,320
(8,253)
16,199

$      5,888
5,822
(54)
(4,307)
$     7,349

Beginning balance
New loans
Effect of changes in composition of related parties
Repayments
Ending Balance

$

$

- 97 - 
- 97 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8. Mortgage Banking 

Net revenues from the sales and servicing of mortgage loans consisted of the following: 

Gain from sale of mortgage loans
Mortgage loan servicing revenue (expense):

Mortgage loan servicing revenue
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights
Mortgage servicing rights valuation adjustments

$

2016

Years Ended December 31
2015
(In Thousands)
$    4,564

5,311

2014

$    3,335

3,560
(1,724)
123
1,959

3,503
(1,620)
266
2,149

3,552
(1,401)
116
2,267

Net mortgage banking income

$ 7,270

$   6,713

$   5,602

The unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans serviced for third parties was $1.37 billion at 
December 31, 2016 and $1.34 billion at December 31, 2015. 

Activity for capitalized mortgage servicing rights and the related valuation allowance follows: 

Mortgage servicing assets:

Balance at beginning of period
Loans sold, servicing retained
Amortization

Carrying value before valuation allowance

at end of period

Valuation allowance:

Balance at beginning of period
Impairment recovery (charges)
Balance at end of period

Net carrying value of MSRs at end of period
Fair value of MSRs at end of period

2016

Years Ended December 31
2015
(In Thousands)

2014

$ 9,893
1,948
(1,724)

$   9,923
1,590
(1,620)

$   10,133
1,191
(1,401)

10,117

9,893

9,923

(645)
123
(522)
$     9,595
$     9,770

(911)
266
(645)
$     9,248
$     9,802

(1,027)
116
(911)
$     9,012
$     9,304

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights is computed based on payments and payoffs of the related 
mortgage loans serviced. 

The  Company  had  no  actual  losses  from  secondary  market  buy-backs  in  2016. Based  on  management’s 
estimate  of  potential  losses  from  secondary  market  buyback  activity,  a  liability  of  $79,000  and  $214,000
was  accrued  at  December  31,  2016  and  2015,  respectively,  and  is  reflected  in  other  liabilities  in  the 
Consolidated  Statements  of  Financial  Condition.    Expense  (credit)  recognized  related  to  the  accrual  was 
$(135,000), $(95,000) and $298,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

- 98 - 
- 98 -

The Company’s servicing portfolio is comprised of the following: 

Investor

Fannie Mae
Freddie Mac
Federal Home Loan Bank
Other
Totals

December 31

2016

2015

Number of
Loans

Principal
Outstanding

Number of
Loans

Principal
Outstanding

(In Thousands)

5,004
9,229
101
16
14,350

$

470,692
889,280
11,081
965
$       1,372,018

5,104
9,015
118
21
14,258

$          484,155
845,564
12,605
1,398
$       1,343,722

Custodial  escrow  balances  maintained  in  connection  with  serviced loans were $12.6 million and $11.6
million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Significant  assumptions  at  December 31,  2016 used  in  determining  the  value  of  MSRs  include  a 
weighted average prepayment speed assumption (“PSA”) of 152 and a weighted average discount rate of 
12.01%.  Significant assumptions at December 31, 2015 used in determining the value of MSRs include a 
weighted average prepayment rate of 181 PSA and a weighted average discount rate of 10.02%.   

A  sensitivity  analysis  of  the  current  fair  value  to  immediate  10%  and  20%  adverse  changes  in  those 
assumptions as of December 31, 2016 is presented below. These sensitivities are hypothetical. Changes 
in fair value based on 10% and 20% variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because 
the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, the 
effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the MSR is calculated independently 
without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another 
(for  example,  changes  in  mortgage  interest  rates,  which  drive  changes  in  prepayment  rate  estimates, 
could result in changes in the discount rates), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

Assumption:

Decline in fair value from increase in prepayment rate
Decline in fair value from increase in discount rate

$ 243
311

$ 475
612

10% Adverse 20% Adverse

Change

Change

(In Thousands)

- 99 - 
- 99 -

 
9. Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:

Cost:

Land
Land improvements
Buildings
Leasehold improvements
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
Construction in process

Less allowances for depreciation and amortization

December 31

2016

2015

(In Thousands)

$

$

7,534
1,310
41,895
971
31,253
787
83,750
(46,792)
36,958

$

$

7,494
1,310
41,556
971
29,622
656
81,609
(43,443)
38,166

Depreciation expense was $3.4 million, $3.3 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 
2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Lease Agreements

The Company has entered into lease agreements covering six First Insurance Group offices, two banking 
center locations, two land leases for which the Company owns the banking centers, one land lease which 
is  primarily  used  for  parking,  one  land  lease  that  is  to  be terminated  in  the  first  quarter  of  2017  and 
numerous stand-alone Automated Teller Machine sites with varying terms and options to renew. 

Future minimum commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (In Thousands):

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Total

$

$

584
400
337
265
222
2,654
4,462

Rental expenses under operating leases amounted to $571,000, $601,000 and $653,000 in 2016, 2015, 
and 2014, respectively.

- 100 - 
- 100 -

10. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill 

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year is as follows: 

Beginning balance
Goodwill acquired or adjusted during the year
Ending balance

Acquired Intangible Assets

December 31

2016

2015

(In Thousands)

$

$

61,798
-
61,798

$

$

61,525
273
61,798

Activity in intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was as follows:

Balance as of January 1, 2014
Amortization of intangible assets
Balance as of December 31, 2014
Intangible assets acquired
Amortization of intangible assets
Balance as of December 31, 2015
Amortization of intangible assets
Balance as of December 31, 2016

Gross
Carrying
Amount

$ 14,302
-
14,302
175
-
14,477
-
$ 14,477

Accumulated
Amortization
(In Thousands)
$ (10,805)
(1,102)
(11,907)
-
(699)
(12,606)
(535)
$ (13,141)

Net
Value

$

$

3,497
(1,102)
2,395
175
(699)
1,871
(535)
1,336

Estimated  amortization  expense  for  each  of  the  next  five  years  and  thereafter  is  as  follows  (In 
Thousands): 

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Total

11. Deposits 

The following schedule sets forth interest expense by type of deposit:  

$

$

404
332
225
149
87
139
1,336

2016

Years Ended December 31
2015
(In Thousands)
$

$

1,463
88
4,710
6,261

1,186
89
4,066
5,341

$

$

2014

1,236
90
3,957
5,283

Checking and money market accounts
Savings accounts
Certificates of deposit
Totals

$

$

- 101 - 
- 101 -

Accrued interest payable on deposit accounts amounted to $42,000 and $43,000 at December 31, 2016
and  2015,  respectively,  which  was  comprised  of  $19,000 and  $23,000  for  certificates  of  deposit  and 
checking and money market accounts, respectively, at December 31, 2016 and $25,000 and $18,000 for 
certificates of deposit and checking and money market accounts, respectively, at December 31, 2015.

A summary of deposit balances is as follows:

Non-interest bearing checking accounts
Interest bearing checking and money market accounts 
Savings deposits
Retail certificates of deposit less than $250,000
Retail certificates of deposit greater than $250,000

December 31

2016

2015

(In Thousands)

$

487,663
816,665
243,369
400,080
33,851
$ 1,981,628

$

420,691
767,201
219,655
403,902
24,688
$ 1,836,137

Scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit at December 31, 2016 are as follows (In Thousands): 

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Total

$

$

156,767
117,627
78,750
35,298
45,489
-
433,931

12. Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank 

First  Federal  has  the  ability  to  borrow  funds  from  the  FHLB.  First  Federal  pledges  its  single-family 
residential  mortgage  loan  portfolio,  certain  investment  securities;  certain  first mortgage  home  equity 
loans, certain commercial real estate loans, and certain agriculture real estate loans as security for these 
advances.  Advances  secured  by  investment  securities  must have  collateral  of  at  least  105%  of  the 
borrowing.  Advances  secured  by  residential  mortgages  must  have  collateral  of  at  least  125%  of  the 
borrowings.  Advances  secured  by  commercial  real  estate  loans,  and  agriculture  real  estate  loans must 
have collateral of at least 300% of the borrowings. The total level of borrowing is also limited to 50% of 
total assets and at least 50% of the borrowings must be secured by either one-to-four family residential 
mortgages  or  investment  securities.  Total  loans  pledged  to  the  FHLB  at  December 31,  2016  and 
December  31,  2015 were  $843.8 million and  $692.2 million,  respectively.  First  Federal  could  obtain 
advances of up to approximately $448.9 million from the FHLB at December 31, 2016. 

- 102 - 
- 102 -

At year-end, advances from the FHLB were as follows:

Principal Terms

December 31, 2016
Putable advances
Single maturity fixed rate advances
Amortizable mortgage advances

December 31, 2015
Putable advances
Single maturity fixed rate advances
Amortizable mortgage advances

Advance 
Amount

(In Thousands)

Range of Maturities

$

5,000 March 2018

92,000  November 2017 to March 2022

6,943
$ 103,943

September 2018

$

5,000 March 2018

47,000  December 2017 to March 2022

7,902 December 2017 to October 2021

$

59,902

Putable advances are callable at the option of the FHLB on a quarterly basis. 

Weighted 
Average
Interest 
Rate

2.35%
1.34%
1.78%

2.35%
1.51%
1.78%

Estimated future minimum payments by fiscal year based on maturity date and current interest rates are 
as follows (In Thousands):

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Total minimum payments
Less amounts representing interest
Totals

$

$

32,306
24,853
15,637
21,283
10,143
3,162
107,384
(3,441)
103,943

First Defiance also utilizes short-term advances from the FHLB to meet cash flow needs and for short-
term  investment  purposes.  First  Defiance  borrows  short-term  advances  under  a  variety  of  programs  at 
FHLB. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no amounts outstanding under First Defiance’s Cash 
Management Advance line of credit. The total available under this line is $15.0 million. In addition, First
Defiance has a $100.0 million REPO Advance line of credit available. There were no borrowings against 
this line at December 31, 2016 and 2015. Amounts are generally borrowed under the Cash Management 
and REPO lines on an overnight basis.  

13. Junior Subordinated Debentures Owed to Unconsolidated Subsidiary Trust

In  March  2007,  the  Company  sponsored  an  affiliated  trust,  First  Defiance  Statutory  Trust  II  (“Trust 
Affiliate II”) that issued $15 million of Guaranteed Capital Trust Securities (Trust Preferred Securities). 
In connection with the transaction, the Company issued $15.5 million of Junior Subordinated Deferrable 
Interest  Debentures  (“Subordinated  Debentures”)  to  Trust  Affiliate  II.  The  Company  formed  Trust 
Affiliate II for the purpose of issuing Trust Preferred Securities to third-party investors and investing the 
proceeds from the sale of these capital securities solely in Subordinated Debentures of the Company. The 
Subordinated Debentures held by Trust Affiliate II are the sole assets of that trust. The Company is not 
considered  the  primary  beneficiary  of  this  Trust  (variable  interest  entity),  therefore  the  trust  is  not 
consolidated in the Company’s financial statements, but rather the subordinated debentures are shown as 
a  liability.  Distributions  on  the  Trust  Preferred  Securities  issued  by  Trust  Affiliate  II  are  payable 

- 103 - 

- 103 -

quarterly at a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 1.5%. The Coupon rate payable on 
the Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate II was 2.46% and 2.01% as of December 31, 2016 
and 2015 respectively.

The Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate II are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole 
or part, upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures. The Company has entered into an agreement 
that  fully  and  unconditionally  guarantees  the  Trust  Preferred  Securities  subject  to  the  terms  of  the 
guarantee. The Trust Preferred Securities and Subordinated Debentures mature on June 15, 2037, but can 
be redeemed at the Company’s option at any time now.  

The Company also sponsors an affiliated trust, First Defiance Statutory Trust I (“Trust Affiliate I”), that 
issued  $20  million  of  Trust  Preferred  Securities in  2005.  In  connection  with  this transaction,  the 
Company  issued  $20.6  million  of  Subordinated  Debentures  to  Trust  Affiliate  I.  Trust  Affiliate  I  was 
formed  for  the  purpose  of  issuing  Trust  Preferred  Securities  to  third-party  investors and  investing  the 
proceeds from the sale of these capital securities solely in Subordinated Debentures of the Company. The 
Junior  Debentures  held  by  Trust  Affiliate  I  are  the  sole  assets  of  the  trust. The  Company  is  not 
considered  the  primary  beneficiary  of  this  Trust  (variable  interest  entity),  therefore  the  trust  is  not 
consolidated in the Company’s financial statements, but rather the subordinated debentures are shown as 
a  liability.    Distributions  on  the  Trust  Preferred  Securities  issued  by  Trust  Affiliate  I  are  payable 
quarterly at a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 1.38%. The Coupon rate payable on 
the Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate I was 2.34% and 1.89% as of December 31, 2016
and 2015 respectively.

The Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate I are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole 
or in part, upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures. The Company has entered into an agreement 
that  fully  and  unconditionally  guarantees  the  Trust  Preferred  Securities  subject  to  the  terms  of  the 
guarantee. The Trust Preferred Securities and Subordinated Debentures mature on December 15, 2035, 
but can be redeemed at the Company’s option at any time now. 

The subordinated debentures may be included in Tier 1 capital (with certain limitations applicable) under 
current regulatory guidelines and interpretations. 

A  summary  of  all  junior  subordinated  debentures  issued  by  the  Company  to  affiliates  follows.  These 
amounts  represent  the  par  value  of  the  obligations  owed  to  these  affiliates,  including  the  Company’s 
equity  interest  in  the  trusts.  Junior  subordinated  debentures  owed  to  the  following  affiliates  were  as 
follows: 

First Defiance Statutory Trust I due December 2035
First Defiance Statutory Trust II due June 2037
Total junior subordinated debentures owed to 

unconsolidated subsidiary Trusts

December 31

2016

2015

(In Thousands)

$

$

20,619
15,464

36,083

$

$

20,619
15,464

36,083

Interest on both issues of Trust Preferred Securities may be deferred for a period of up to five years at the 
option of the issuer.

- 104 - 
- 104 -

14. Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other Short Term Borrowings  

Total securities sold under agreement to repurchase are summarized as follows:

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase

Amounts outstanding at year-end
Year-end interest rate
Average daily balance during year
Maximum month-end balance during the year
Average interest rate during the year

Years Ended December 31

2016

2015

(In Thousands, Except Percentages)

$

31,816

$

57,188

0.22%

52,821
57,984

0.26%

0.27%

54,632
60,272
0.28%

We utilize securities sold under agreements to repurchase to facilitate the needs of our customers and to 
facilitate secured short-term funding needs.  Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are stated at 
the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction.  We monitor levels on a continuous basis. 
We may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities.  
Securities pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements are maintained with our safekeeping agent.

The  remaining  contractual  maturity  of  the  securities  sold  under  agreements  to  repurchase  in  the 
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 is presented in the following tables. 

Overnight and 
Continuous

Up to 30 
Days

30-90 Days

Greater 
than 90 
Days

At December 31, 2016
Repurchase agreements:
Mortgage-backed securities – residential
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Total borrowings
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for repurchase agreements

21,222
10,594
31,816

$

$

(In Thousands)

$

$

-
-
-

$

$

-
-
-

$

$

-
-
-

Overnight and 
Continuous

Up to 30 
Days

30-90 Days

Greater 
than 90 
Days

At December 31, 2015
Repurchase agreements:
Mortgage-backed securities – residential
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Total borrowings
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for repurchase agreements

23,998
33,190
57,188

$

$

(In Thousands)

$

$

-
-
-

$

$

-
-
-

$

$

-
-
-

Total

21,222
10,594
31,816
31,816

Total

23,998
33,190
57,188
57,188

$

$
$

$

$
$

On December 29, 2016, First Defiance entered into a loan agreement with First Tennessee Bank for a 
$20 million line of credit.  The rate on the line of credit is at three- month LIBOR and was undrawn on as 
of December 31, 2016. 

As  of  December  31,  2016 and  2015,  First  Federal  had  the  following  undrawn  lines  of  credit  facilities 
available for short-term borrowing purposes: 

A  $11.2 million  line  of  credit  with  the  Federal  Reserve  Bank  Discount Window, at an interest 
rate of 50 basis points over the fed funds rate.  The fed funds rate as of December, 31, 2016 was 
0.75%.  This line was undrawn upon as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. 

- 105 - 

- 105 -

A $20.0 million line of credit with MUFG Union Bank, N.A.  The rate on this line of credit is 
Union Bank’s fed funds rate, which floats daily.  This line was undrawn upon as of December 
31, 2016 and 2015. 

15.  Other Noninterest Expense

The following is a summary of other noninterest expense:

Legal and other professional fees
Marketing
State financial institutions tax
REO expenses and write-downs
Printing and office supplies
Amortization of intangibles
Postage
Check charge-offs and fraud losses
Credit and collection expense
Other
Total other noninterest expense

2016

2014

Years Ended December 31
2015
(In Thousands)
$ 3,359
1,752
1,783
1,064
457
699
459
207
334
5,402
$ 15,516

$ 2,902
1,835
1,781
244
512
535
456
266
303
7,118(1)

$ 3,622
1,820
1,762
743
466
1,102
594
142
395
6,611(2)

$ 17,257

$ 15,952

1)

2)

Includes $443,000 of acquisition related expenses and $300,000 of costs associated with 
termination of a lease agreement.
Includes $786,000 of costs associated with the termination of First Federal’s merger agreement 
with FCB.  

16. Postretirement Benefits

First  Defiance  sponsors  a  defined  benefit  postretirement  plan  that  is  intended  to  supplement  Medicare 
coverage for certain retirees who meet minimum age requirements. First Federal employees who retired 
prior to April 1, 1997 and who completed 20 years of service after age 40 receive full medical coverage 
at  no  cost.  First  Federal  employees  retiring  after  April 1,  1997  are  provided  medical  benefits  at  a  cost 
based on their combined age and years of service at retirement. Surviving spouses are also eligible for 
continued coverage after the retiree is deceased at a subsidy level that is 10% less than what the retiree is 
eligible  for.  First  Federal  employees  retiring  before  July 1,  1997  receive  dental  and  vision  care  in 
addition to medical coverage. First Federal employees who retire after July 1, 1997 are not eligible for 
dental or vision care. 

First  Federal  employees  who  were  born  after  December 31,  1950  are  not  eligible  for  the  medical 
coverage described above at retirement. Rather, a one-time medical spending account of up to $10,000 
(based on the participant’s age and years of service) will be established to reimburse medical expenses 
for those individuals. First Insurance employees who were born before December 31, 1950 can continue 
coverage  until  they  reach  age  65,  or  in  lieu  of  continuing  coverage,  can  elect  the  medical  spending 
account option, subject to eligibility requirements. Employees hired or acquired after January 1, 2003 are 
eligible only for the medical spending account option. 

Included  in  accumulated  other  comprehensive  income  at  December  31,  2016,  2015 and  2014 are  the 
following amounts that have not yet been recognized in net periodic benefit cost:

- 106 - 
- 106 -

Unrecognized prior service cost
Unrecognized actuarial losses
Total recognized in Accumulated Other

Comprehensive Income

Income tax effect
Net amount recognized in Accumulated Other

Comprehensive Income

2016

52
392

444
(155)

December 31
2015
(In Thousands)
$

53
593

646
(226)

289

$

420

$

$

2014

65
832

897
(314)

583

$

$

The  prior  service  cost  and  actuarial  loss  included  in  other  comprehensive  income  and  expected  to  be 
recognized in net postretirement benefit cost during the fiscal year-ended December 31, 2017 is $12,000
($8,000 net of tax) and $10,000 ($7,000 net of tax), respectively. 

Reconciliation of Funded Status and Accumulated Benefit Obligation
The  plan  is  not  currently  funded.  The  following  table  summarizes  benefit  obligation  and  plan  asset 
activity for the plan measured as of December 31 each year:

Change in benefit obligation:

Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost 
Participant contribution
Plan amendments for acquisitions
Actuarial  (gains) / losses
Benefits paid
Benefit obligation at end of year
Change in fair value of plan assets:
Balance at beginning of year
Employer contribution
Participant contribution
Benefits paid
Balance at end of year 
Funded status at end of year

December 31

2016

2015

(In Thousands)

$

$

3,115
53
128
29
12
(184)
(168)
2,985

-
139
29
(168)
-
(2,985)

$

$

3,263
65
130
27
-
(204)
(166)
3,115

-
139
27
(166)
-
(3,115)

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost includes the following components: 

Service cost-benefits attributable to service during the period
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit 

obligation

Net amortization and deferral
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost
Net (gain) / loss during the year
Plan amendment for acquisition
Amortization of prior service cost and actuarial losses
Total recognized in comprehensive income
Total recognized in net periodic postretirement benefit

cost and other comprehensive income

2016

$

53

Years Ended December 31
2015
(In Thousands)
$

65

$

128
30
211
(184)
12
(30)
(202)

130
47
242
(204)
-
(47)
(251)

2014

63

136
35
234
377
-
(35)
342

$

9

$

(9)

$

576

The  following  assumptions  were  used  in  determining  the  components  of  the  postretirement  benefit 
obligation: 

- 107 - 

- 107 -

Weighted average discount rates:

Used to determine benefit obligations at December 31
Used to determine net periodic postretirement benefit cost for years ended 

December 31

2016

2015

2014

4.00%

4.25%

4.25%

4.25%

4.25%

4.75%

Assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31:
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend 

rate)

Year that rate reaches ultimate trend rate

7.50%

6.50%

7.00%

5.00%
2022

5.00%
2019

5.00%
2019

The following benefits are expected to be paid over the next five years and in aggregate for the next five 
years  thereafter.  Because  the  plan  is  unfunded,  the  expected  net  benefits  to  be  paid  and  the  estimated 
Company contributions are the same amount.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022 through 2026

Expected to be Paid
(In Thousands)

$

160
173
182
197
180
1,035

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care 
plans. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following 
effect:

Effect on total of service and interest cost
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation

One-Percentage-Point 
Increase
Year Ended December 31
2015
(In Thousands)
$

2016

$

$

27
369

27
376

One-Percentage-Point 
Decrease
Year Ended December 31
2015

2016

(22)
(314)

$ (22)
(320)

The Company expects to contribute $160,000 before reflecting expected Medicare retiree drug subsidy 
payments in 2017. 

17. Regulatory Matters  

First  Federal  is  subject  to  minimum  capital  adequacy  guidelines. Failure  to  meet  minimum  capital 
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators, 
which  could  have  a  material  impact  on  First  Federal’s  financial  statements.    Under  capital  adequacy 
guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, First Federal must maintain capital 
amounts in excess of specified minimum ratios based on quantitative measures of First Federal’s assets, 
liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.

In July 2013, Federal Reserve and the FDIC approved the final rules implementing the Basel Committee 
on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks (commonly known as Basel III).  Under the 
final rules, which began for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015 and are subject to a phase-in 
period  through  January  1,  2019,  minimum  requirements  will  increase  for  both  quantity  and  quality  of 
capital  held  by  the Company and the Bank.  The rules include a new minimum common equity Tier 1 

- 108 - 

- 108 -

capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (“CET1”) of 4.5% and a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-
weighted  assets,  which  when  fully  phased-in,  effectively  results  in  a  minimum  CET1  ratio  of  7.0%.  
Basel III raises the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% (which, 
with the capital conservation buffer, effectively results in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5% when 
fully  phased-in),  which  effectively  results  in  a  minimum  total  capital  to  risk-weighted  assets  ratio  of 
10.5% (with the capital conservation buffer fully phased-in), and requires a minimum leverage ratio of 
4.0%.  Basel III also makes changes to risk weights for certain assets and off-balance sheet exposures.

The following schedule presents First Defiance consolidated and First Federal’s regulatory capital ratios
as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (Dollars in Thousands): 

December 31, 2016

Actual

Minimum Required for 
Adequately Capitalized

Minimum Required for Well 
Capitalized

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio(1)

Amount

Ratio

CET1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) (2)

Consolidated

First Federal 

Tier 1 Capital (1)

Consolidated

First Federal 

$234,809

$242,928

10.45%

10.81%

$101,108

$101,116

$269,809

$242,928

11.24%

10.14%

$95,975

$95,791

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)

Consolidated

First Federal 

$269,809

$242,928

12.01%

10.81%

$134,811

$134,822

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)

Consolidated

First Federal 

$295,693

$268,812

13.16%

11.96%

$179,748

$179,763

4.5%

4.5%

4.0%

4.0%

6.0%

6.0%

8.0%

8.0%

N/A

$146,057

N/A

$119,739

N/A

$179,763

N/A

6.5%

N/A

5.0%

N/A

8.0%

N/A

$224,703

N/A

10.0%

(1) Excludes capital conservation buffer of 0.625% as of December 31, 2016. 
(2) Core capital is computed as a percentage of adjusted total assets of $2.40 billion for consolidated and $2.39 
billion for the Bank. Risk-based capital is computed as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets of $2.25 
billion for consolidated and the Bank.

December 31, 2015

Actual

Minimum Required for 
Adequately Capitalized

Minimum Required for Well 
Capitalized

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

CET1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) (1)

Consolidated

First Federal 

Tier 1 Capital (1)

Consolidated

First Federal 

$218,297

$236,625

10.71%

11.61%

$91,710

$91,678

$253,297

$236,625

11.46%

10.72%

$88,424

$88,267

Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)

Consolidated

First Federal 

$253,297

$236,625

12.43%

11.61%

$122,280

$122,237

Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)

Consolidated

First Federal 

$278,679

$262,007

13.67%

12.86%

$163,040

$162,983

4.5%

4.5%

4.0%

4.0%

6.0%

6.0%

8.0%

8.0%

N/A

$132,424

N/A

$110,334

N/A

$162,983

N/A

6.5%

N/A

5.0%

N/A

8.0%

N/A

$203,729

N/A

10.0%

- 109 - 

- 109 -

(1) Core capital is computed as a percentage of adjusted total assets of $2.21 billion for consolidated and the Bank. 
Risk-based capital is computed as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets of $2.04 billion for consolidated 
and the Bank.

Management believes that, as of December, 31, 2016, First Federal was “well capitalized” based on the 
ratios presented above.  There are no conditions or events since the most recent notification from any of 
the regulatory agencies regarding those capital standards that management believes have changed any of 
the well capitalized categorizations of First Federal.  

First  Federal  is  subject  to  the  regulatory  capital  requirements  administered  by  the OCC  and  FDIC.
Regulatory authorities can initiate certain mandatory actions if First Federal fails to meet the minimum 
capital requirements, which could have a direct material effect on the Corporation’s financial statements. 
Management  believes,  as  of  December  31,  2016,  that  First  Federal  meets  all  capital  adequacy 
requirements to which they are subject.

First  Defiance  is  a  unitary  thrift  holding  company  and  is  regulated  by  the  Federal  Reserve. First 
Defiance did not have prompt corrective action capital requirements as of December 31, 2016.    

Dividend  Restrictions  -  Dividends  paid  by  First  Federal  to  First  Defiance  are  subject  to  various 
regulatory restrictions. First Federal paid $22.0 million in dividends to First Defiance in 2016 and $29.0 
million  in  2015.  First  Federal  can  initiate  dividend  payments  equal  to  its  net  profits  (as  defined  by 
statute) for the last two fiscal years, plus any year to date net profits.  First Insurance paid $1.2 million in 
dividends to First Defiance in 2016 and $900,000 in dividends in 2015.  First Defiance Risk Management 
paid $1.0 million in dividends to First Defiance in 2016 and 2015. 

18. Income Taxes

The components of income tax expense are as follows:

Current:

Federal
State and local

Deferred 

2016

Years Ended December 31
2015
(In Thousands)

2014

$

$

13,125
244
(615)
12,754

$

$

11,299
146
(35)
11,410

$

$

9,198
144
(179)
9,163

The effective tax rates differ from federal statutory rate applied to income before income taxes due to the
following: 

2016

Years Ended December 31
2015
(In Thousands)
13,240
$

$

14,559

159
(1,168)
(341)
(414)
(41)
12,754

$

95
(1,219)
(255)
(415)
(36)
11,410

$

2014

11,709

94
(1,152)
(816)
(390)
(282)
9,163

Tax expense at statutory rate (35%)
Increases (decreases) in taxes from:

State income tax – net of federal tax benefit
Tax exempt interest income, net of TEFRA
Bank owned life insurance
Captive insurance 
Other

Totals

$

$

- 110 - 
- 110 -

Deferred federal income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying 
amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  for  financial  reporting  purposes  and  the  amounts  used  for  income  tax 
purposes. 

Significant  components  of  First  Defiance’s  deferred  federal  income  tax  assets  and  liabilities  are  as 
follows: 

Deferred federal income tax assets:

Allowance for loan losses
Postretirement benefit costs
Deferred compensation
Impaired loans
Accrued vacation
Allowance for real estate held for sale losses
Deferred loan origination fees and costs
Accrued bonus
Other

Total deferred federal income tax assets

Deferred federal income tax liabilities:

FHLB stock dividends
Goodwill
Mortgage servicing rights
Fixed assets
Other intangible assets
Loan mark to market
Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities
Prepaid expenses

Total deferred federal income tax liabilities
Net deferred federal income tax asset/ (liability)

December 31

2016

2015

(In Thousands)

$

$

9,059
1,044
1,847
1,087
454
226
462
626
1,554
16,359

2,279
5,967
3,358
1,217
301
59
272
694
14,147
2,212

$

$

8,884
1,316
1,621
261
644
269
388
675
794
14,852

2,279
5,527
3,237
1,268
422
165
2,176
655
15,729
(877)

The  realization  of  the  Company’s  deferred  tax  assets  is  dependent  upon  the  Company’s  ability  to 
generate  taxable  income  in  future  periods  and  the  reversal  of  deferred  tax  liabilities  during  the  same 
period  and  the  ability  to  carryback  any  losses.  The  Company  has  evaluated  the  available  evidence 
supporting  the  realization  of  its  deferred  tax  assets  and  determined  it  is  more  likely  than  not  that  the 
assets will be realized and thus no valuation allowance was required at December 31, 2016. 

Retained earnings at December 31, 2016 include approximately $11.0 million for which no tax provision 
for federal income taxes has been made. This amount represents the tax bad debt reserve at December 31, 
1987, which is the end of the Company’s base year for purposes of calculating the bad debt deduction for 
tax purposes. If this portion of retained earnings is used in the future for any purpose other than to absorb 
bad debts, the amount used will be added to future taxable income. The unrecorded deferred tax liability 
on the above amount at December 31, 2016 was approximately $3.85 million.

- 111 - 
- 111 -

A  reconciliation  of  the  beginning  and  ending  amount  of  unrecognized  tax  benefits  is  as  follows  (In 
Thousands): 

Balance at January 1, 2014
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions of prior years
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
Reductions due to the statute of limitations
Settlements
Balance at December 31, 2014

Balance at January 1, 2015
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions of prior years
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
Reductions due to the statute of limitations
Settlements
Balance at December 31, 2015

Balance at January 1, 2016
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions of prior years
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
Reductions due to the statute of limitations
Settlements
Balance at December 31, 2016

$

$

$

$

$

$

-
-
-
-
-
-
-

-
-
-
-
-
-
-

-
-
398
-
-
-
398

The Company does not expect the unrecognized tax benefits to have an effect on its effective tax rate.
The  Company  expects  the  entire amount  of  unrecognized  tax  benefits  to  settle  within  the  next  twelve 
months.    The  Company  does  not  expect  the  total  amount  of  unrecognized  tax  benefits  to  significantly 
increase in the next twelve months.

The  total  amount  of  interest  and  penalties  recorded  in  the  income  statement  was  $40,000  for  the  year 
ended December 31, 2016, and zero for 2015 and 2014, and the amount accrued for interest and penalties 
was $40,000 at December 31, 2016, and zero for 2015 and 2014. 

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in the state 
of Indiana. The Company is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2012.
The  Company  currently  operates  primarily  in  the  states  of  Ohio  and  Michigan,  which  tax  financial 
institutions based on their equity rather than their income. 

19. Employee Benefit Plans 

401(k) Plan

Employees  of  First  Defiance  are  eligible  to  participate  in  the  First  Defiance  Financial  Corp.  401(k) 
Employee Savings Plan (the “First Defiance 401(k)”) if they meet certain age and service requirements. 
Under  the  First  Defiance  401(k),  First  Defiance  matches  100%  of  the  participants’  contributions  up  to 
3% of compensation and then 50% of the participants’ contributions for the next 2% of compensation.
The First Defiance 401(k) also provides for a discretionary First Defiance contribution in addition to the 
First Defiance matching contribution. First Defiance matching contributions totaled $979,000, $892,000 
and  $919,000  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2016,  2015 and  2014, respectively.  There  were  no 
discretionary contributions in any of those years. 

- 112 - 
- 112 -

Group Life Plan 

On  June  30,  2010,  First  Federal  adopted  the  First  Federal  Bank  of  the  Midwest  Executive  Group  Life 
Plan  – Post  Separation  (the  “Group  Life  Plan”)  in  which  various  employees,  including the Company’s 
named  executive  officers,  may  participate.  Under  the terms  of  the  Group  Life  Plan,  First  Federal  will 
purchase  and  own  life  insurance  policies  covering  the  lives  of  employees  selected  by  the  board  of 
directors of First Federal as participants. There was $71,000, $78,000 and $167,000 of expense recorded 
for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, with a liability of $1.04 million, 
$970,000 and $892,000 for future benefits recorded at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The  discount  rate  was  reduced  to  4.00%  as  of  December  31,  2016,  resulting  in  an  increase  to  the 
Company’s liability.

20. Stock Compensation Plans  

First  Defiance  has  established  equity  based  compensation  plans  for  its  directors  and  employees.    On 
March  15,  2010,  the  Board  adopted,  and  the  shareholders  approved  at  the  2010  Annual  Shareholders 
Meeting,  the  First  Defiance  Financial Corp. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Equity Plan”). The 
2010  Equity  Plan  replaced all  plans existing  at  the  time  of  its  approval.  All  awards  outstanding  under 
prior plans remain in effect in accordance with their respective terms. Any new awards are made under 
the  2010  Equity  Plan.    The  2010  Equity  Plan  allows  for  issuance  of  up  to  350,000  common  shares 
through  the  award  of  options,  stock  grants,  restricted  stock  units  (“RSU”),  stock  appreciation rights or 
other stock-based awards.

As  of  December  31,  2016,  54,750  options  had been  granted  pursuant  to  the  2010  Equity  Plan  and 
previous  plans,  and  remain  outstanding  at  option  prices  based  on  the  market  value  of  the  underlying 
shares on the date the options were granted. Options granted under all plans vest 20% per year except for 
the 2009 grant to the Company’s executive officers, which vested 40% in 2011 and then 20% annually. 
All options expire ten years from the date of grant. Vested options of retirees expire on the earlier of the 
scheduled expiration date or three months after the retirement date.

In each of the years 2014-2016, the Company approved a Short-Term (“STIP”) Equity Incentive Plan and 
a Long-Term (“LTIP”) Equity Incentive Plan for selected members of management.

Under  the  2014  and  2015  STIPs,  the  participants  could  earn  up  to  30%  to  45%  of  their  salary  for 
potential payout based on the achievement of certain corporate performance targets during the calendar 
year. The 2016 STIP allows participants to earn up to 10% to 45% of their salary for potential payout 
based on the achievement of certain corporate performance targets during the calendar year.  The final 
amount of benefits under the STIPs is determined as of December 31 of the same year and paid out in 
cash in the first quarter of the following year. The participants are required to be employed on the day of 
payout in order to receive such payment.  

Under each LTIP, the participants may earn up to 20% to 45% of their salary for potential payout in the 
form of equity awards based on the achievement of certain corporate performance targets over a three-
year  period.  The  Company  granted  30,538;  24,757;  and  24,526  RSU’s  to  the  participants  in  the  2014, 
2015 and 2016 LTIPs, respectively, effective January 1 in the year the award was made, which represents 
the maximum target award. The amount of benefit under each LTIP will be determined individually at 
the end of the 36 month performance period ending December 31. The benefits earned under each LTIP 
will  be  paid  out  in  equity  in  the  first  quarter  following  the  end  of  the  performance  period.    The 
participants are required to be employed on the day of payout in order to receive such payment.   

- 113 - 
- 113 -

 
In 2016, the Company also granted 3,894 restricted shares to directors and employees. 1,872 shares were 
issued to directors, 1,000 shares were issued to employees that have a one-year vesting period and 1,022 
shares were issued to an employee with a four year vesting period.

The  fair  value  of  each  option  award  is  estimated  on  the  date  of  grant  using  the  Black-Scholes  model. 
Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company’s common shares. The Company 
uses historical data to estimate option exercise and post-vesting termination behavior. The expected term 
of options granted is based on historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are 
expected to be outstanding, which takes into account that the options are not transferable. The risk-free 
interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the 
time of the grant.   

The fair value of stock options granted was determined at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes stock 
option-pricing model and the following assumptions: 

Expected average risk-free rate
Expected average life
Expected volatility
Expected dividend yield

Twelve Months Ended

December 31,    
2016
2.05%
8.96 years

41.00%
2.33%

December 31, 

2015
2.04%
10.00 years
42.00%
2.10%

Following is activity under the plans during 2016: 

Stock options:

Options outstanding, January 1, 2016
Forfeited or cancelled
Exercised
Granted
Options outstanding, December 31, 2016
Vested or expected to vest at

December 31, 2016

Exercisable at December 31, 2016

Options 
Outstanding
86,220
-
(37,970)
6,500
54,750

$

Weighted 
Average 
Exercise Price
20.27
-
20.47
37.78
22.21

$

54,750
38,300

$
$

22.21
17.86

Weighted 
Average 
Remaining 
Contractual 
Term (in years)

Aggregate 
Intrinsic 

Value       

(in 000’s)

3.51

3.51
1.57

$

$
$

1,562

1,562
1,259

Information related to the stock option plans follows: 

Intrinsic value of options exercised
Cash received from option exercises
Tax benefit realized from option exercises
Weighted average fair value of options granted

Year Ended December 31
2014
2015
2016
(In Thousands, except per share amounts)
$     1,069
$
1,469
160
13.13

752
714
165
$     13.95

$         542
963
103
$     10.79

$

As  of  December  31,  2016,  there  was  $156,000  of  total  unrecognized  compensation  costs  related  to 
unvested stock options granted under the Company’s equity plans. The cost is expected to be recognized 
over a weighted-average period of 3.2 years.

- 114 - 
- 114 -

At December 31, 2016, 75,468 RSU’s were outstanding. Compensation expense is recognized over the 
performance period based on the achievement of established targets. Total expense of $1.3 million, $1.1
million  and  $541,000  was  recorded  during  the years  ended  December  31,  2016,  2015 and  2014,
respectively, and approximately $773,000 and $556,000 is included within other liabilities at December
31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to the STIPs and LTIPs.

Restricted Stock Units

Stock Grants

Unvested Shares

Shares

Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

Unvested at January 1, 2016
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Unvested at December 31, 2016

74,545
24,526
(7,011)
(16,592)
75,468

$

$

25.86
39.30
19.19
19.19
32.31

Shares

10,927
10,905
(10,171)
(500)
11,161

Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

$

$

30.98
23.39
24.02
32.00
32.30

The  maximum  amount  of  compensation  expense  that  may  be  earned for  the  2016 STIP  and  the  2014,
2015 and 2016 LTIPs at December 31, 2016 is approximately $3.6 million in the aggregate.  However, 
the  estimated  expense  expected  to  be  earned as  of  December  31,  2016 based  on  the  performance 
measures in the plans, is $2.4 million of which $584,000 was unrecognized at December 31, 2016 and 
will be recognized over the remaining performance period. 

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, 168,251 and 186,079 shares, respectively, were available for grant 
under the 2010 Equity Plan. Options forfeited or cancelled under all plans except the 2010 Equity Plan
are no longer available for grant to other participants. 

21. Parent Company Statements 

Condensed parent company financial statements, which include transactions with subsidiaries, follow: 

Statements of Financial Condition

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
Investment in banking subsidiary
Investment in non-bank subsidiaries
Other assets

Total assets

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity:

Subordinated debentures
Accrued liabilities
Stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

December 31

2016

2015

(In Thousands)

$

$

$

$

23,017
290,053
15,456
1,155
329,681

36,083
580
293,018
329,681

$

$

$

$

12,919
287,436
15,109
1,191
316,655

36,083
375
280,197
316,655

- 115 - 

- 115 -

Statements of Income

Dividends from subsidiaries
Interest on investments
Interest expense 
Other income
Noninterest expense
Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of subsidiaries
Income tax credit 
Income before equity in earnings of subsidiaries
(Distributions in excess of) undistributed equity in earnings of 

subsidiaries

Net income
Comprehensive income

Statements of Cash Flows

Operating activities:

2016

Years Ended December 31
2015
(In Thousands)

2014

$

$
$

$

24,200
-
(753)
-
(644)
22,803
(466)
23,269

$

30,900
1
(613)
1
(588)
29,701
(397)
30,098

5,574
28,843
25,436

$
$

(3,675)
26,423
25,931

$
$

22,200
-
(587)
2
(861)
20,754
(485)
21,239

3,053
24,292
27,861

2016

Years Ended December 31
2015
(In Thousands)

2014

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) 

provided by operating activities:

Distribution in excess of (undistributed equity in) earnings 

of subsidiaries

Change in other assets and liabilities
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

Financing activities:

Repurchase of common stock
Cash dividends paid 
Stock Options Exercised
Direct stock sales
Repayment of stock warrants
Net cash used in financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

$ 28,843

$ 26,423

$ 24,292

(5,574)

235
23,504

(6,293)
(7,890)
714
63
-
(13,406)
10,098
12,919

3,675

(205)
29,893

(8,436)
(7,159)
1,469
64
(11,979)
(26,041)
3,852
9,067

(3,053)

59
21,298

(15,519)
(5,937)
921
76
-
(20,459)
839
8,228

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

$ 23,017

$   12,919

$ 9,067

22. Fair Value 

FASB ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to 
transfer  a  liability  in  an  orderly  transaction  between  market  participants.  A  fair  value  measurement 
assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the 
asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or 
liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the 
asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that 
assumes  exposure  to  the  market  for  a  period  prior  to  the  measurement  date  to  allow  for  marketing 
activities  that  are  usual  and  customary  for  transactions  involving  such  assets  and  liabilities;  it  is  not  a 
forced  transaction.  Market  participants  are  buyers  and  sellers  in  the  principal  market  that  are  (i) 
independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

FASB  ASC  Topic  820  requires  the  use  of  valuation  techniques  that  are  consistent  with  the  market 
approach,  the  income  approach  and/or  the  cost  approach.  The  market  approach  uses  prices  and  other 

- 116 - 

- 116 -

relevant  information  generated  by  market  transactions  involving  identical  or  comparable  assets  and 
liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash flows 
or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on the amount 
that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost). Valuation 
techniques  should  be  consistently  applied.  Inputs  to  valuation  techniques  refer  to  the  assumptions  that 
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those 
that  reflect  the  assumptions  market  participants  would  use  in  pricing  the  asset  or  liability  developed 
based  on  the  best  information  available.  In  that  regard,  FASB  ASC  Topic  820  established  a  fair  value 
hierarchy  for  valuation  inputs  that  gives  the  highest  priority  to  quoted  prices  in  active  markets  for 
identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as 
follows: 

•

•

•

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that 
the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level  2:  Inputs  other  than  quoted  prices  included  in  Level  1  that  are  observable  for  the 
asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar 
assets  or  liabilities  in  active  markets,  quoted  prices  for  identical  or  similar  assets  or 
liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable 
for  the  asset  or  liability  (such  as  interest  rates,  prepayment  speeds,  credit  risks,  etc.)  or 
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by a correlation or 
other means.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for determining fair value of assets and liabilities that reflect 
an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in 
pricing the assets or liabilities.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the 
general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.   

Available  for  sale  securities  -  Securities  classified  as  available  for  sale  are  generally  reported  at  fair 
value utilizing Level 2 inputs where the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent 
pricing service that uses matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to 
value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by 
relying  on  the  securities’  relationship  to  other  benchmark  quoted  securities  (Level  2  inputs).  The  fair 
value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows 
and  the  bonds’  terms  and  conditions,  among  other  things.  Securities  in  Level  1 include federal agency 
preferred  stock  securities.  Securities  in  Level  2  include  U.S.  Government  agencies,  mortgage-backed 
securities, corporate bonds and municipal securities.      

Impaired loans - Fair values for impaired collateral dependent loans are generally based on appraisals 
obtained  from  licensed  real  estate  appraisers  and  in  certain  circumstances  consideration  of  offers 
obtained to purchase properties prior to foreclosure. Appraisals for commercial real estate generally use 
three methods to derive value: cost, sales or market comparison and income approach. The cost method 
bases value on the cost to replace the current property. Value of market comparison approach evaluates 
the  sales  price  of  similar  properties  in  the  same  market  area. The  income  approach  considers  net 
operating income generated by the property and an investors required return. Adjustments are routinely 
made  in  the  appraisal  process  by  the  independent  appraisers  to  adjust  for  differences  between  the 
comparable  sales  and  income  data  available. Comparable  sales  adjustments  are  based  on  known  sales 
prices of similar type and similar use properties and duration of time that the property has been on the 

- 117 - 
- 117 -

market to sell. Such adjustments made in the appraisal process are typically significant and result in a 
Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. 

Real Estate held for sale - Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded 
at  fair  value  less  costs  to  sell  when  acquired,  establishing  a  new  cost  basis.    These  assets  are  then
reviewed monthly by members of the asset review committee for valuation changes and are accounted for 
at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell.  Fair value is commonly based on recent real 
estate appraisals which may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including 
cost,  comparable  sales  and  the  income  approach.    Adjustments  are  routinely  made  in  the  appraisal 
process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income 
data available.  Such adjustments may be significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the 
inputs for determining fair value. 

Appraisals  for  both  collateral-dependent  impaired  loans  and  other  real  estate  owned  are  performed  by 
certified general appraisers (for commercial properties) or certified residential appraisers (for residential 
properties)  whose  qualifications  and  licenses  have  been  reviewed  and  verified  by  the  Company. Once 
received,  a  member  of  the  Company’s  asset  quality  or  collections  department  reviews  the  assumptions 
and approaches utilized in the appraisal. Appraisal values are discounted from 0% to 20% to account for 
other  factors  that  may  impact  the  value  of  collateral.  In  determining  the  value  of  impaired  collateral 
dependent  loans  and  other  real  estate  owned,  significant  unobservable  inputs  may  be  used,  which 
include:   physical  condition  of  comparable  properties  sold,  net  operating  income  generated  by  the 
property and investor rates of return.  

Mortgage  servicing  rights  –  On  a  quarterly  basis,  mortgage  servicing  rights  are  evaluated  for 
impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to the carrying amount.  If the carrying 
amount  of  an  individual  tranche  exceeds  fair  value,  impairment  is  recorded  on  that  tranche  so  that the 
servicing asset is carried at fair value.  Fair value is determined at a tranche level based on a model that 
calculates  the  present  value  of  estimated  future  net  servicing  income.    The  valuation  model  utilizes 
assumptions  that  market participants  would  use  in  estimating  future  net  servicing  income  and  are 
validated against available market data (Level 2).

Mortgage banking derivative - The fair value of mortgage banking derivatives are evaluated monthly 
based  on  derivative  valuation  models  using  quoted  prices  for  similar  assets  adjusted  for  specific 
attributes of the commitments and other observable market data at the valuation date (Level 2). 

The  following  table  summarizes  the  financial  assets  measured  at  fair  value  on  a  recurring  basis 
segregated  by  the  level  of  the  valuation  inputs  within  the  fair  value  hierarchy  utilized  to  measure  fair 
value:

- 118 - 
- 118 -

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

December 31, 2016 

Level 1 
Inputs 

Level 2 
Inputs

Level 3
Inputs

Total Fair
Value

(In Thousands)

Available for sale securities:

Obligations of U.S. Government  
corporations and agencies
Mortgage-backed - residential
REMICs
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Preferred stock
Corporate bonds
Obligations of state and political            
subdivisions
Mortgage banking derivative - asset

$

$

-
-
-
-
2
-

-
-

$

3,915
81,707
1,307
63,005
-
13,013

88,043
491

$

-
-
-
-
-
-

-

3,915
81,707
1,307
63,005
2
13,013

88,043
491

December 31, 2015

Level 1 
Inputs 

Level 2 
Inputs

Level 3
Inputs
(In Thousands)

Total Fair
Value

Available for sale securities:

Obligations of U.S. Government  
corporations and agencies
Mortgage-backed - residential
REMICs
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Preferred stock
Corporate bonds
Obligations of state and political            
subdivisions
Mortgage banking derivative - asset

$

$

-
-
-
-
1
-

-
-

$

2,994
64,654
1,620
71,799
-
4,977

90,390
558

$

-
-
-
-
-
-

-

2,994
64,654
1,620
71,799
1
4,977

90,390
558

There  were  no  assets  measured  at  fair  value  on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs 
(Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. 

The  following  table  summarizes  the  financial  assets  measured  at  fair  value  on  a  non-recurring  basis 
segregated  by  the  level  of  the  valuation  inputs  within  the  fair  value  hierarchy  utilized  to  measure  fair 
value:

- 119 - 
- 119 -

   
   
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis

December 31, 2016

Level 1 Inputs

Level 2 Inputs

Level 3 Inputs

(In Thousands)

Impaired loans

1-4 Family Residential Real 

Estate

Multi Family Residential
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial
Home Equity and      

Improvement

Total impaired loans

Mortgage servicing rights
Real estate held for sale

Residential 
CRE

Total Real Estate held for 
sale

$ -
-
-

-
-

-

-
-
-

$ -
-
-

-
-

657

-
-
-

$ 316
-
848
332

-
1,496

-

-
377
377

December 31, 2015

Level 1 Inputs

Level 2 Inputs

Level 3 Inputs

(In Thousands)

Impaired loans

1-4 Family Residential Real 

Estate

Multi Family Residential
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial
Home Equity and      

Improvement

Total impaired loans

Mortgage servicing rights
Real estate held for sale

Residential 
CRE

Total Real Estate held for 
sale

$ -
-
-

-
-

-

-
-
-

$ -
-
-

-
-

872

-
-
-

$ 398
91
4,575
-

82
5,146

-

-
280
280

Total Fair 
Value

$ 316
-
848
332

-
1,496

657

-
377
377

Total Fair
Value

$ 398
91
4,575
-

82
5,146

872

-
280
280

For  Level  3  assets  and  liabilities  measured  at  fair  value  on  a  recurring  or  nonrecurring  basis  as  of 
December  31,  2016,  the  significant  unobservable  inputs  used  in  the  fair  value  measurements were  as 
follows: 

- 120 - 
- 120 -

Fair 
Value 

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Inputs
(Dollars in Thousands)

Range of      
Inputs

Weighted 
Average

Impaired Loans- Applies to 
all loan classes

Real estate held for sale –
Applies to all classes

$1,496 Appraisals  which  utilize 
net 

comparison,

sales 
income and cost approach

$377 Appraisals  which  utilize 
net 

sales 
income and cost approach 

comparison, 

Discounts  for  collection 
issues  and  changes 
in 
market conditions

10-30%

11%

Discounts  for  changes  in 
market conditions

0-20%

7%

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis as of 
December  31,  2015,  the  significant  unobservable  inputs  used  in  the  fair  value  measurements 
were as follows: 

Fair 
Value 

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Inputs
(Dollars in Thousands)

Impaired Loans- Applies to 
all loan classes

Real estate held for sale –
CRE

$5,146 Appraisals  which  utilize 
net 

comparison, 

sales 
income and cost approach 

$280 Appraisals  which  utilize 
net 

sales 
income and cost approach

comparison, 

Discounts  for  collection 
issues  and  changes 
in 
market conditions

Discounts  for  changes  in 
market conditions

Range of     
Inputs

Weighted 
Average

10-30%

11%

30%

30%

Impaired  loans,  which  are  measured  for  impairment  using  the  fair  value  of  the  collateral  for  collateral 
dependent loans, had a fair value of $1.5 million, with a $1,000 valuation allowance and a fair value of 
$5.1 million  with  a  valuation  allowance  of  $8,000 at  December  31,  2016 and  2015,  respectively.  A 
provision  expense  of  $1.0 million, a  provision  recovery of  $580,000  and  a  provision  expense  of  $3.0
million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, related to these impaired 
loans was included in earnings. 

Mortgage  servicing  rights,  which  are  carried  at  the  lower  of  cost  or  fair  value,  had  a  fair  value  of 
$657,000 with  a  valuation  allowance  of  $522,000  and  a  fair  value  of  $872,000 with  a  valuation 
allowance of $645,000 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  A recovery of $123,000, $266,000 
and  $116,000 for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2016,  2015  and  2014,  respectively, was  included  in 
earnings.

Real estate held for sale is determined using Level 3 inputs which include appraisals and are adjusted for 
changes in market conditions. The change in fair value of real estate held for sale was $74,000, $297,000 
and $251,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which was recorded 
directly as an adjustment to current earnings through non-interest expense. 

In  accordance  with  FASB  ASC  Topic  825,  the  Fair  Value  Measurements  tables  are  a  comparative 
condensed  consolidated  statement  of  financial  condition  based  on  carrying  amount  and  estimated  fair
values  of  financial  instruments  as  of  December  31,  2016 and  December 31,  2015.  Accordingly,  the 
aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of First Defiance.

- 121 - 

- 121 -

Much of the information used to arrive at “fair value” is highly subjective and judgmental in nature and 
therefore the results may not be precise. Subjective factors include, among other things, estimated cash 
flows,  risk  characteristics  and  interest  rates,  all  of  which  are  subject  to  change.  With  the  exception  of 
investment securities, the Company’s financial instruments are not readily marketable and market prices 
do  not  exist.  Since  negotiated  prices  for  the  instruments,  which  are  not  readily  marketable,  depend 
greatly on the motivation of the buyer and seller, the amounts that will actually be realized or paid per 
settlement or maturity of these instruments could be significantly different.

The  carrying  amount  of  cash  and  cash  equivalents,  term  notes  payable  and  advance  payments  by 
borrowers for taxes and insurance, as a result of their short-term nature, is considered to be equal to fair 
value and are classified as Level 1.

It  was  not  practicable  to  determine  the  fair  value  of  FHLB  stock  due  to  restrictions  placed  on  its 
transferability.

The fair value of loans that reprice within 90 days is equal to their carrying amount. For other loans, the 
estimated fair value is calculated based on discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates currently 
being offered for loans with similar terms, resulting in a Level 3 classification.  Impaired loans are valued 
at the lower of cost or fair value as previously described.  The allowance for loan losses is considered to 
be a reasonable adjustment for credit risk.  The methods utilized to estimate the fair value of loans do not
necessarily represent an exit price.  The fair value of loans held for sale is estimated based on binding 
contracts and quotes from third party investors resulting in a Level 2 classification.  

The  fair  value  of  accrued interest receivable is equal to the carrying amounts resulting in a Level 2 or 
Level 3 classification, which is consistent with its underlying asset.

The fair value of non-interest bearing deposits are considered equal to the amount payable on demand at 
the reporting date (i.e., carrying value) and are classified as Level 1.  The fair value of savings, NOW and 
certain money market accounts are equal to their carrying amounts and are a Level 2 classification.  Fair 
values  of  fixed  rate  certificates  of  deposit  are  estimated  using  a  discounted cash  flow  calculation  that 
applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly 
maturities on time deposits resulting in a Level 2 classification.  

The  fair  values  of  securities  sold  under  repurchase agreements  are  equal  to  their  carrying  amounts 
resulting  in  a  Level  2  classification.  The  carrying  value  of  subordinated  debentures  and  deposits  with 
fixed  maturities  is  estimated  based  on  discounted  cash  flow  analyses  based  on  interest  rates  currently 
being  offered  on  instruments  with  similar  characteristics  and  maturities  resulting  in  a  Level  3 
classification.

FHLB advances with maturities greater than 90 days are valued based on discounted cash flow analysis, 
using interest rates currently being quoted for similar characteristics and maturities resulting in a Level 2 
classification.  The  cost  or  value  of  any  call  or  put  options  is  based  on  the  estimated  cost  to  settle  the 
option at December 31, 2016. 

- 122 - 
- 122 -

Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
Loans, net, including loans

held for sale

Accrued interest receivable

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits
Advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
Securities sold under repurchase 
agreements
Subordinated debentures

Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
Loans, net, including loans

held for sale

Accrued interest receivable

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits
Advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
Securities sold under repurchase 
agreements
Subordinated debentures

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
(In Thousands)

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Carrying 
Value

$

99,003
251,176
13,798

$

99,003
251,179
N/A

1,924,210
6,760

1,911,280
6,760

$ 99,003 $

2
N/A

-
9

$

-
251,177
N/A

-
-
N/A

9,917
867

1,901,363
5,884

$ 1,981,628

$ 1,987,723

$   487,663 $  1,500,060

$

103,943

103,019

31,816
36,083

31,816
34,718

-

-
-

103,019

31,816
-

-

-

-
34,718

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015
(In Thousands)

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Carrying
Value

$

79,769
236,678
13,801

$

79,769
236,680
N/A

1,782,358
6,171

1,784,998
6,171

$   79,769 $

1
N/A

-
7

$

-
236,679
N/A

-
-
N/A

5,899
846

1,779,099
5,318

$ 1,836,137

$ 1,840,464

$   420,691 $  1,419,773

$

59,902

59,653

57,188
36,083

57,188       
35,305

-

-
-

59,653

57,188
-

-

-

-
35,305

23. Derivative Financial Instruments

Commitments  to  fund  certain  mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market 
and  forward  commitments  for  the  future  delivery  of  mortgage  loans  to  third-party  investors  are 
considered  derivatives.  It  is  the  Company’s  practice  to  enter  into  forward  commitments  for  the  future 
delivery of residential mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to 
economically  hedge  the  effect  of  changes  in  interest  rates  resulting  from its  commitments  to  fund  the 
loans.  These mortgage banking derivatives are not designated in hedge relationships.  First Federal had 
approximately $14.1 million and $14.9 million of interest rate lock commitments at December 31, 2016
and  2015,  respectively.    There  were  $22.5 million and  $19.9 million  of  forward  commitments  for  the 
future delivery of residential mortgage loans at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  

- 123 - 
- 123 -

The  fair  value of these mortgage banking derivatives are reflected by a derivative asset or a derivative 
liability.  The table below provides data about the carrying values of these derivative instruments: 

Assets   

December 31, 2016 
(Liabilities)  

December 31, 2015 

Assets     (Liabilities)

Carrying 
Value 

Carrying  

  Value 

Derivative 
Net Carrying
Value 

Carrying 

Carrying 

   Value 

      Value 

Derivative
Net Carrying
Value

(In Thousands)

$ 

491  $ 

-  $ 

491  $ 

558  $ 

-  $ 

558

Derivatives not designated as

hedging instruments

Mortgage Banking 

Derivatives

The table below provides data about the amount of gains and losses recognized in income on derivative 
instruments not designated as hedging instruments: 

Twelve Months Ended December 31,
2016

2015

2014

Derivatives  not  designated  as  hedging 
instruments

(In Thousands)

Mortgage Banking Derivatives – Gain (Loss)

$

(67)

$

231

$

27

The  above  amounts  are  included  in  mortgage  banking  income  with  gain  on  sale  of  mortgage  loans.  
During 2014, management determined that a group of loans, previously classified as held for sale, were 
no longer sellable and were transferred back into the portfolio.  As a result, a $5,000 loss related to a fair 
value adjustment on those loans was recorded in.  No such adjustments were made in 2016 or 2015. 

24. Quarterly Consolidated Results of Operations (Unaudited)

The following is a summary of the quarterly consolidated results of operations: 

2016
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for 

loan losses

Gain on sale, call or write-down 

of securities

Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Income before income taxes
Income taxes 
Net income

Earnings per common share:

Basic
Diluted

Average shares outstanding:

Basic
Diluted

Three Months Ended

March 31

June 30

September 30

December 31

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

$

$

21,130
1,942
19,188
364

18,824

131
8,505
17,274
10,186
3,017
7,169

$          0.80
0.80
$

8,994
9,064

$

$

$
$

21,480
2,084
19,396
53

19,343

227
8,348
17,347
10,571
3,307
7,264

0.81
0.80

8,968
9,036

- 124 - 

- 124 -

$

$

$
$

22,003
2,183
19,820
15

19,805

151
8,375
18,292
10,039
2,994
7,045

0.78
0.78

8,976
9,050

$

$

$
$

22,770
2,231
20,539
(149)

20,688

-
8,293
18,180
10,801
3,436
7,365

0.82
0.81

8,969
9,035

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for 

loan losses

Gain on sale, call or write-down 

of securities

Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Income before income taxes
Income taxes 
Net income

Earnings per common share:

Basic
Diluted

Average shares outstanding:

Basic
Diluted

Three Months Ended

March 31

June 30

September 30

December 31

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

$

$

19,757
1,567
18,190
120

18,070

-
8,281
16,897
9,454
2,853
6,601

$          0.71
0.69
$

9,234
9,611

$

$

$
$

20,037
1,672
18,365
-

18,365

-
7,809
16,796
9,378
2,815
6,563

0.71
0.70

9,268
9,349

$

$

$
$

20,266
1,733
18,533
(27)

18,560

-
7,982
16,848
9,694
2,998
6,696

0.72
0.72

9,238
9,322

$

$

$
$

20,776
1,809
18,967
43

18,924

22
7,709
17,348
9,307
2,744
6,563

0.72
0.71

9,146
9,235

25. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The before and after tax amounts allocated to each component of other comprehensive income (loss) are 
presented  in  the  table  below.  Reclassification  adjustments  related  to  securities  available  for  sale  are 
included in gains on sale or call of securities in the accompanying consolidated condensed statements of 
income. Reclassification  adjustments  related  to  the  defined  benefit  postretirement  medical  plan are 
included  in  compensation  and  benefits  in  the  accompanying  consolidated  condensed  statements  of 
income. 

Twelve months ended December 31, 2016:
Securities available for sale and transferred securities:

Change in net unrealized gain/(loss) during the period
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income

Defined benefit postretirement medical plan:
Net  gain on  defined  benefit  postretirement  medical  plan  realized 
during the period

Reclassification adjustment for net amortization and deferral on
defined  benefit  postretirement  medical  plan (included 
in 
compensation and benefits)
Total other comprehensive income 

$

$

Before Tax 
Amount

Tax Expense 
(Benefit)
(In Thousands)

Net of Tax 
Amount

(4,933)
(509)

$

(1,726)
(178)

172

60

30
(5,240)

$

11
(1,833)

$

$

(3,207)
(331)

112

19
(3,407)

- 125 - 

- 125 -

Twelve months ended December 31, 2015:
Securities available for sale and transferred securities:

Change in net unrealized gain/(loss) during the period
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income

Defined benefit postretirement medical plan:
Net  gain  on  defined  benefit  postretirement  medical  plan  realized 
during the period

Reclassification adjustment for net amortization and deferral on 
defined  benefit  postretirement  medical  plan  (included 
in 
compensation and benefits)
Total other comprehensive income 

$

$

Before Tax 
Amount

Tax Expense 
(Benefit)
(In Thousands)

Net of Tax 
Amount

(985)
(22)

$

204

47
(756)

$

(345)
(7)

72

16
(264)

$

$

(640)
(15)

132

31
(492)

Activity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, was as follows: 

Securities
Available
For Sale

$

4,042

Post-
retirement
Benefit
(In Thousands)
(420)
$

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

$

3,622

(3,095)

(312)

(3,407)

215

4,114

(508)

16

(492)

3,622

Balance January 1, 2016
Other comprehensive income before 

reclassifications

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other 

comprehensive loss

Net other comprehensive income during period

Balance December 31, 2016

Balance January 1, 2015
Other comprehensive income before 

reclassifications

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other 

comprehensive loss

Net other comprehensive income during period

(3,207)

(331)

(3,538)

$

504

$

4,697

$

$

(640)

(15)

(655)

112

19

131

(289)

(583)

132

31

163

$

$

Balance December 31, 2015

$

4,042

$

(420)

$

- 126 - 
- 126 -

  
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None. 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

First  Defiance’s  management  carried  out  an  evaluation,  under  the  supervision  and  with  the 
participation  of  the  chief  executive  officer  and  the  chief  financial  officer,  of  the  effectiveness  of  First 
Defiance’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) 
under  the  Exchange  Act)  as  of  December  31,  2016.  Based  upon  that  evaluation,  the  chief  executive 
officer  along  with  the  chief  financial  officer  concluded  that  First  Defiance’s  disclosure  controls  and 
procedures as of December 31, 2016, are effective.

The  information  set  forth  under  “Management’s  Report  on  Internal  Control  Over  Financial 
Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” included in Item 8 above is 
incorporated herein by reference.

There  were  no  changes  in  First  Defiance’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  (as  such 
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the last fiscal quarter 
ended December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect First 
Defiance’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.  Other Information 

On February 23, 2017, the Compensation Committee of First Defiance approved a new form of 
restricted  stock  unit  (“RSU”)  award  agreement  that  may  be  used  to  grant  RSUs  pursuant  to  First 
Defiance’s 2010 Equity Plan.  The form agreement provides for a grant of RSUs that vest on the third 
anniversary of the grant date and are settled in common shares of First Defiance.  Vesting is accelerated 
in  the  event  of  death,  disability  or  retirement  (as  defined  under  the  2010  Equity  Plan).  Vesting  also  is 
accelerated in the event of termination of employment without cause after a change in control (as defined 
under  the  2010  Equity  Plan).  The  form  of  award  agreement  contains  a  non-solicitation  covenant.    The 
form of RSU award agreement is attached as Exhibit 10.24 and incorporated herein by reference. 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

PART III

The  information  required  by  this  item  relating  to  our  directors,  nominees  for  directorship  and 
executive  officers  is  incorporated  herein  by reference  from  the  section  captioned  “Composition  of  the 
Board” under the heading “PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors” and the section immediately following 
the heading “EXECUTIVE OFFICERS” in the definitive proxy statement to be filed on or about March 
29, 2017 for the annual meeting of First Defiance shareholders to be held on May 9, 2017 (the “Proxy 
Statement”).  Information  regarding  our  Audit  Committee  and  compliance  with  Section  16(a)  of  the 
Securities  Act  of  1943  required  by  this  item  is  incorporated herein  by  reference  from  the  sections 
respectively  captioned,  “Board  Committees”  under  the  “Proposal  1  – Election  of  Directors”  and  the 
section immediately following the heading “SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING 
COMPLIANCE”  of  the  Proxy  Statement.    There have  been  no  material  changes  to  the  procedures  by 
which shareholders may recommend nominees to the board of directors.   

First  Defiance  has  adopted  a  code  of  ethics  applicable  to  all  officers,  directors  and  employees 
that  complies  with  SEC  requirements,  and  is  available  on  its  Internet  site  at  www.fdef.com  under 
Governance Documents. 

- 127 - 
- 127 -

  
 
Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information  regarding  director  compensation  is  set  forth  under  the  section  captioned  “Director 
Compensation” under the heading “PROPOSAL 1 – Election of Directors” of the Proxy Statement, and is 
incorporated  herein  by  reference.  Executive  compensation  information  has  been  provided  under  the 
headings 
“EXECUTIVE 
COMPENSATION” in the Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.

“COMPENSATION  DISCUSSION  AND  ANALYSIS” 

and 

The  Compensation  Committee  Report  and  information  related  to  compensation  committee 
interlocks  and  insider  participation  have  been  respectively  set  forth  under  the  section  immediately 
following  the  heading “COMPENSATION  COMMITTEE  REPORT”  and  under  the  section  captioned 
“Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” following the heading “PROPOSAL 1 –
Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement, and are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security  Ownership  of  Certain  Beneficial  Owners  and  Management  and  Related 
Stockholder Matters

The  information  regarding  security  ownership  of  certain  beneficial  owners  and  management 
and  information  relating  thereto  is  set  forth  in  the  section  under  the  heading  “BENEFICIAL 
OWNERSHIP” in the Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2016 with respect to the shares of 
First  Defiance  common  stock  that  are  reserved  for  issuance under  First  Defiance’s  existing  equity 
compensation plans. 

Number of securities to 
be Issued Upon 
Exercise of Outstanding 
Options, Warrants and 
Rights
(a)

Weighted Average 
Exercise Price of 
Outstanding Options, 
Warrants and Rights
(b)

Number of Securities 
Remaining Available 
for Future Issuance 
Under Equity 
Compensation Plans 
(Excluding Securities 
Reflected in Column (a)
(c)

54,750

$22.21

168,251

Plan Category

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by 
Security Holders

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item, including related transactions and director independence, 
is set forth respectively in the section following the heading “RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS” 
and  in  the  section  captioned  “Composition  of  the  Board”  following  the  heading  “PROPOSAL  1  –
Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement, which are both incorporated by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The  information  required  by  this  item  is  set  forth  under  the  section  captioned  “Audit  Fees” 
following the heading “INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM” in the Proxy 
Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.

- 128 - 

- 128 -

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)

Financial Statements

(1)

The following documents are filed as Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

(A) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Crowe Horwath LLP)
(B) Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2016

and 2015

(C) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2016,

2015 and 2014

(D) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 

2016, 2015 and 2014

(E) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended

December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

(F) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 

2016, 2015 and 2014

(G) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(2)

(3)

Separate  financial  statement  schedules  are  not  being  filed because  of  the  absence  of 
conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in 
the consolidated financial statements or the related notes.

The  exhibits  required  by  this  item  are  listed  in  the  Exhibit  Index  of  this  Form  10-K.  The 
management contracts and compensation plans or arrangements required to be filed with this 
Form 10-K are listed as Exhibits 10.1 through 10.24. 

- 129 - 

- 129 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the 
Registrant  has  duly  caused  this  report  to  be  signed  on  its  behalf  by  the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly 
authorized. 

February 28, 2017 

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.

By: /s/ Kevin T. Thompson 
Kevin T. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed 
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 
28, 2017. 

Signature 

Title

/s/ William J. Small 
William J. Small 

/s/ Donald P. Hileman
Donald P. Hileman

/s/ Kevin T. Thompson 
Kevin T. Thompson 

/s/ Stephen L. Boomer 
Stephen L. Boomer 

/s/ John L. Bookmyer 
John L. Bookmyer

/s/ Dr. Douglas A. Burgei 
Dr. Douglas A. Burgei 

/s/ Thomas A. Reineke
Thomas A. Reineke

/s/ Barb A. Mitzel
Barb A. Mitzel

/s/ Jean A. Hubbard 
Jean A. Hubbard 

/s/ Samuel S. Strausbaugh
Samuel S. Strausbaugh 

/s/ Charles D. Niehaus 
Charles D. Niehaus

Chairman of the Board 

President and Chief
Executive Officer

Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (principal accounting officer)

Director, Vice Chairman

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

- 130 - 

- 130 -

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit Index

This report incorporates by reference the documents listed below that we have previously filed 
with  the  SEC.  The  SEC  allows  us  to  incorporate  by  reference  information  in  this  document.  The 
information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this document. 

This information may be read and copied at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F 
Street,  N.E.,  Washington  D.C.  20549.  The  SEC  also  maintains  an  internet  web  site  that  contains 
reports,  proxy  statements,  and  other  information  about  issuers,  like  First  Defiance,  who  file 
electronically  with  the  SEC.  The  address  of  the  site  is  http://www.sec.gov.  The  reports  and  other 
information  filed  by  First  Defiance with the SEC are also available at the First Defiance Financial 
Corp. web site. The address of the site is http://www.fdef.com. Except as specifically incorporated by 
reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K, information on those web sites is not part of this 
report.  

Exhibit
Number
2.1

2.2

3.1
3.2
3.3
4.1

4.2

Description
Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 23, 2016 by 

and between First Defiance and Commercial Bancshares, Inc.

Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 31, 2016 by 

and between First Defiance and Commercial Bancshares, Inc. 

Articles of Incorporation 
Code of Regulations
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
Agreement to furnish instruments and agreements defining

rights of holders of long-term debt

Form of Warrant for Purchase of Shares of Common Stock

10.1

Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under 2001 Stock Option and 

Incentive Plan

10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5

10.6
10.7
10.8

2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
Employment Agreement with Gregory R. Allen
2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
Letter Agreement, dated December 5, 2008, between First Defiance and the 

U.S. Treasury

2008 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (LTIP)
Form of Contingent Award Agreement under LTIP
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under 2005 Stock Option and 

Incentive Plan

10.9

First Federal Amended and Restated Executive Group Life Plan – Post 

Separation

10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13

2010 Equity Incentive Plan
First Defiance Deferred Compensation Plan
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (with TARP Limitations)
2010 Equity Plan Form of Long-Term Incentive Performance-Based  

Award Agreement

10.14

2010 Equity Plan Form of Short-Term Incentive Performance-Based 

Award Agreement

10.15

First Amendment to First Defiance Financial Corp. 2010 Equity Incentive 

Plan

10.16
10.17

First Defiance Financial Corp. and Affiliates Incentive Compensation Plan
First Defiance Financial Corp. Long-Term Restricted Stock Unit Award 

Agreement (2012 Long Term Incentive – TARP Applicable)

10.18

First Defiance Financial Corp. Long-Term Restricted Stock Unit Award 

Agreement (2012 Long Term Incentive)

10.19
10.20

Employment Agreement with Donald P. Hileman
Employment Agreement with Kevin T. Thompson

(29)

(12)
(1)
(1)
(7)
(27)

(11)

(2)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(8)

(9)
(10)

(3)

(13)
(14)
(22)
(15)

(16)

(17)
(18)

(19)
(20)

(21)

(23)
(24)

- 131 - 

- 131 -

10.21
10.22
10.23
10.24
21
23.1
31.1

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement
Consulting Agreement with William J. Small
Change of Control and Non-Solicitation Agreement with John R. Reisner
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement
List of Subsidiaries of the Company
Consent of Crowe Horwath LLP
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101

Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the 

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) the Consolidated 
Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of 
Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in 
Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, 
and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as 
blocks of text and in detail.

(25)
(26)
(28)
(12)
(12)
(12)
(12)

(12)

(12)

(12)

(12)

(1) 

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5) 

(6) 

(7) 

(8) 

(9) 

(10) 

(11) 

(12) 
(13) 

(14) 
(15) 

(16) 

(17) 

(18) 

Incorporated herein by reference to the like numbered exhibit in the Registrant’s Form S-1 (File 
No. 33-93354) 
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  exhibit  10.2 in  Registrant’s  2004  Form  10-K  (Film  No. 
05685500) 
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  exhibit  10.16  in  Registrant’s  2008  Form  10-K  (Film  No. 
09683948)  
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  Appendix  B to  the  2001  Proxy  Statement (Film  No. 
1577137) 
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  exhibit  10.4 in  Form  8-K  filed  October  1,  2007 (Film  No. 
071144951) 
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  Appendix  A  to  the  2005  Proxy  Statement (Film  No. 
05692264) 
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  exhibit  3  in  Form  8-K  filed  December  8,  2008 (Film  No. 
081236105) 
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  exhibit  10  in  Form  8-K  filed  December  8, 2008 (Film No. 
081236105) 
Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.1 in Form 8-K filed December 12, 2008 (Film No. 
081245224) 
Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.2 in Form 8-K filed December 12, 2008 (Film No. 
081245224) 
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  exhibit  4  in  Form  8-K  filed  December  8,  2008 (Film  No. 
081236105) 
Included herein 
Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.1 in Form 10-Q filed November 2, 2010 (Film No. 
101158262) 
Incorporated herein by reference to Annex A to 2010 Proxy Statement (Film No. 10693151) 
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  exhibit  10.1 in  Form  8-K filed  March  4,  2011  (Film  No. 
11664601) 
Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.1 in Form 10-Q filed November 8, 2011 (Film No. 
111188059) 
Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.2 in Form 10-Q filed November 8, 2011 (Film No. 
111188059) 
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  exhibit  10.1  in  Form  8-K  filed  March  15,  2012  (Film  No. 
12694926) 

- 132 - 
- 132 -

(19) 

(20) 

(21) 

(22) 

(23) 

(24) 

(25) 

(26) 

(27) 

(28) 

(29) 

Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  exhibit  10.2  in  Form  8-K  filed  March  15,  2012  (Film  No. 
12694926) 
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  exhibit  10.3  in  Form  8-K  filed  March  15,  2012  (Film  No. 
12694926) 
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  exhibit  10.4  in  Form  8-K  filed  March  15,  2012  (Film  No. 
12694926) 
Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.1 in Form 8-K filed December 23, 2005 (Film No. 
051284175) 
Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.1 in Form 8-K filed December 30, 2013 (Film No. 
131303552) 
Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.2 in Form 8-K filed December 30, 2013 (Film No. 
131303552) 
Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.3 in Form 8-K filed December 30, 2013 (Film No. 
131303552) 
Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.4 in Form 8-K filed December 30, 2013 (Film No. 
131303552
Incorporated herein by reference to like numbered exhibit in Registrant’s 2014 Form 10-K (Film 
No. 15655545) 
Incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  exhibit  10.23  in  Registrant’s  2015 Form  10-K  (Film  No. 
161468309) 
Incorporated herein by reference to the like numbered exhibit in Form 8-K filed August 24, 2016 
(Film No. 161848221) 

- 133 - 
- 133 -

This page intentionally left blank.

- 134 -

This page intentionally left blank.

- 135 -

This page intentionally left blank.

- 136 -

to our shareholders

shareholders information

After  a  strong  performance  for  2016,  
I am proud to celebrate our fourth consecutive 
year of record earnings. As we build upon the 
momentum gained over the last several years, 
we have aligned our strategic efforts through 
identified  core  initiatives  and    key  areas  that 
will drive improved financial performance and 
greater shareholder value. We have opportunity 
for  core  balance  sheet  growth  and  will  focus 
on  loan  and  deposit  growth,  in  addition  to 
overall  revenue  growth,  expense  control  and 
improved asset quality. 

Continued  improvement  in  asset  quality  over 
the  course  of  2016  was  encouraging,  and  we 
look  to  carry  that  trend  throughout  2017.  We 
experienced  solid  growth  in  both  loans  and 
deposits in 2016 by concentrating on attracting 
new  relationships  and  strengthening  current 
ones. As for our outlook on 2017, the economy 
continues  to  show  signs  of  improvement, 
with  the  likelihood  of  several  rate  increases 
by  the  Federal  Reserve;  we  are  confident  in 
our  position  to  implement  our  strategy  in  an 
upward rate environment. We aim to carry our
success forward and target strategic objectives 
long-term  goals.  
to  help  us  achieve  our 

Our  first  objective  is  to  continue  to  refine  
our  plan  for  growth  as  we  address  new

Donald P. Hileman
President & CEO

opportunities  for  branch  expansion  with  a 
concentration  on  our  metro  market  areas.  In 
2016,  we  expanded  our  presence  in  Toledo, 
Ohio  with  two  offices  in  low-to-moderate 
income  areas  near  downtown.  We  have 
also  enhanced  our  Columbus,  Ohio  Loan 
Production  Office  to  a  full-service  branch 
and  are  eager  to  serve  our  customers  with  a 
broadened  line  of  products  and  services.  In 
addition,  we  completed  our  acquisition  of 
Commercial  Bancshares,  Inc.  headquartered 
in Upper Sandusky, Ohio and look forward to 
the opportunity to provide these communities 
with smart banking solutions.

Another  identified  objective  is  to  continue 
talent  development  and  retention  of  our 
workforce. We remain confident in our people 
working hard to adapt to overcome obstacles, 
meet our customers’ expectations and execute 
our  strategic  plans  for  continued  success.  
By recruiting and developing high-performing 
innovation, 
individuals,  we  expect  greater 
collaboration  and  efficiency 
throughout  
our organization. 

In  addition,  we  are  focusing  our  efforts  on 
leveraging  technology  to  strengthen  our 
organization’s  productivity  and  utilize  data 
to  customize  solutions  for  our  customers. 
Additionally,  we  will  explore  banking 
enhancements that will attract new customers 
and  improve  the  banking  experience  for  our 
existing  customers  in  a  way  that  matches 
our  overall  risk  profile.  Our  expansions  in 
digital  banking  offerings  have  been  key  to 
differentiating  ourselves 
from  competition 
and  positioning  ourselves  as  a  technology 
leader  amongst  community  banks.  Recent 
include  a  new,  optimized 
enhancements 
website,  tablet  banking  app  for  personal  and 
business  accounts,  expanded  mobile  wallet 
capabilities  with  the  addition  of  Samsung 
Pay  and  Android  PayTM,  improvements  made  
in our online banking platform and biometric 
security  for  our  mobile  app  with  Touch  ID. 
We  will  continue  to  invest  in  opportunities 
that  keep  pace  with  a  rapidly  changing  
digital environment. 

of our customers. As FinTech and other financial 
to  arise,  consumers 
institutions  continue 
have  more options than ever when it comes 
to  conducting  their  finances.  We  want  to  be 
their  financial  institution  of  choice.  Thus,  it  is  
important for us to understand our customers’
needs, eliminate friction and build meaningful 
relationships as a people-focused organization.   

We  believe  that  being  a  community  bank 
makes a difference to our customers and the 
communities  we  serve.  Last  year,  we  hosted 
our  third  annual  Pay  it  Forward  Day.  We  not 
only supported our nearly 600 employees with 
$10 to perform a random act of kindness, we 
also funded 13 Pay It Forward ideas submitted 
by  our  community  members.  First  Federal 
Bank  and  First  Insurance  Group  will  continue 
to embrace our community-minded roots by 
serving the community we live and work in and 
supporting life-changing organizations.  

Our  Mission  is  to  be  a  high  performing 
community  bank  and  agency  so  that  our 
engaged and valued employees provide smart 
solutions to our clients and communities. To do 
so, we have refreshed our core values to reflect 
this  mission.  We  aim  to  develop  our  Trusted 
Advisors  to  serve  others  by  being:  people 
focused,  performance  driven,  community 
minded, innovative and trustworthy. These key 
statements detail our purpose as a community- 
based  organization,  which  above  all  else  is 
to  provide  our  clients  and  community  with 
solutions that fit their needs and add value to 
their lives.

I  thank  you  for  your  continued  confidence  in 
First Defiance. We have grown to approximately
$2.8  billion  in  assets  by  building  upon  a 
smart  decisions,  careful 
foundation  of 
assessments  and  strong  relationships.  Our 
experienced leadership team has positioned us 
to meet opportunities and challenges that 2017 
will bring. We believe the partnership with our 
shareholders, customers, and employees make 
us all stronger. We truly are better together.  

Also  in  2017,  we  have  structured  a  team 
dedicated to gaining a deeper understanding 

Donald P. Hileman 
President & CEO

Annual Meeting
In order to increase shareholder attendance and participation, the Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be conducted virtually at 1:00 p.m. on 
Tuesday, May 9, 2017. Shareholders may access the Annual Meeting by going to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/fdef2017

Investor Information
Shareholders, investors and analysts interested in additional information about First Defiance Financial Corp. may contact Investor Relations 
at the corporate office, 419-782-5104.

Stock Transfer Agent
Shareholders with questions concerning the transfer of shares, lost 
certificates, dividend payments, dividend reinvestment, receipt of multiple 
dividend checks, duplicate mailings or changes of address should contact:

Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions
PO Box 1342
Brentwood, NY 11717
1-844-318-0128 or 1-720-358-3594
shareholder@broadridge.com

Securities Listing
First Defiance Financial Corp. common stock trades on the 
NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol FDEF.  As 
of March 13, 2017, there were approximately 2,813  
stockholders of record and 10,138,581      

   shares outstanding. 

Dividend Policy
The First Defiance Financial Corp. Board reviews and 
determines on a quarterly basis whether to declare a 
dividend. Dividends declared in 2016 totaled $0.880 per share.

Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Shareholders may automatically reinvest dividends in 
additional First Defiance Financial Corp. common stock 
through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, which also provides 
for purchase by voluntary cash contributions. For additional 
information, please contact: Broadridge Corporate Issuer 
Solutions at 1-844-318-0128 or 1-720-358-3594. 

Auditors 
Crowe Horwath LLP 
330 East Jefferson Boulevard 
South Bend, IN 46624

General Counsel
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease LLP
301 East Fourth Street, Suite 3500 
Cincinnati, OH 45202

Total Return Performance

Total Return Performance

l

e
u
l
e
a
u
V
a
V
x
x
e
e
d
n
d
I
n

I

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0
12/31/11

12/31/12

12/31/13

12/31/14

12/31/15

12/31/16

First Defiance Financial Corp. 
NASDAQ Composite 

SNL Bank NASDAQ 
SNL Midwest Thrift

Price Range 
Year Ended December 31, 2016 

First Quarter 

Second Quarter 

Third Quarter 

Fourth Quarter 

Year Ended  
December 31, 2015 

First Quarter 

Second Quarter 

Third Quarter 

Fourth Quarter 

HIGH 
 $40.98  

 $41.21  

 $46.83  

 $52.31  

LOW
$34.80 

$37.53 

$35.90 

$36.91 

HIGH 

  LOW

 $34.64  

 $38.21  

 $39.95  

 $42.46  

$29.05 

$32.42 

$35.03 

$35.01 

 
 
First Defiance Financial Corp.
601 Clinton Street
Defiance, OH 43512
419-782-5104
Fdef.com 

First Federal Bank of the Midwest
601 Clinton Street
Defiance, OH 43512
419-782-5015
First-Fed.com

First Insurance Group
511 Fifth Street
Defiance, OH 43512
419-784-5431
Firstinsurancegrp.com

2
0
1
6
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

|

F
i
r
s
t
D
e
fi
a
n
c
e
F
n
a
n
c
i
a

i

l

First Defiance Financial Corp.
2016 Annual Report

C
o
r
p

.

For investor relations information, visit Fdef.com