2022 Annual Report
ORD P ERFOR
M
A
N
C
E
By First Associates
C
E
R
Profile
First Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: THFF) is a financial services holding company
headquartered in Terre Haute, Indiana.
Our subsidiary, First Financial Bank N.A., founded in 1834, is the fifth oldest national bank
in the United States and operates 71 banking centers in Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky and
Tennessee. First Financial Corporation provides a full menu of banking services, including
depository accounts, loans, and trust and asset management to retail and business
customers.
Vision
Enhance our clients’ ability to spend, save, borrow and invest.
Mission
Deliver financial solutions that are simple, fast and easy.
Values
We build strong relationships and treat everyone with dignity and respect.
We embrace the diversity of our customers and co-workers.
We apply the highest standards of excellence to everything we do.
We work as a team to deliver world-class customer service.
We are involved in our communities.
We recognize profitability is essential to our future success.
Chairman’s Letter
Dear Fellow Shareholders,
Each year when I sit down to compose this
letter and reflect on what my associates have
accomplished, I am amazed but not surprised.
After all, in 2020, I personally witnessed their
dedication as they kept our lobbies open and
bravely served our customers through the worst
of the COVID 19 pandemic. If those challenges
were not enough, 2021 brought the additional
issues of far too few persons to fill critical jobs,
supply chain shortages, a slowing economy and
inflation at rates not seen in years. While 2022
brought relief in some areas, others worsened
and yet others took their place as inflation
increased, food prices soared, interest rates
rose and the war in the Ukraine continued.
So, what did my associates do in the face of
continued and new obstacles? They turned in
the best financial performance in the history
of our company and did so in a manner that
allowed First Financial to expand into new
markets and to continue to be recognized as
one of the country’s best banks.
Overview of financial results
We closed 2022 with record net income of
$71.1 million compared to $53 million in the
previous year, a 34% increase. Diluted net
income per common share was $5.82, a 44.8%
increase over the $4.02 per share reported
in 2021. Return on average assets of 1.41%
compared to 1.10%, a 28.1% increase. Our
efficiency ratio improved to 58.78% compared
to 68.37% in 2021. Please see our complete
financial results reported in detail in the 10-K
which is included with this annual report.
Loan growth
In 2022, we were able to continue improving
both the quality and quantity of our loan
portfolio. Total outstanding loans increased
$252 million to a record $3.07 billion, an
increase of 8.93% over the prior year. At the
same time, the ratio of non-performing loans
to total loans and leases fell to 0.44%, which
represents a 17% improvement year over year.
Dividends and share repurchase
Our strong financial performance in 2022
allowed us to increase regular dividends for the
34th consecutive year and to declare a special
dividend as well. In addition to our dividend
increases, we were able to repurchase 618,263
of our common shares, returning an additional
$27.3 million to our shareholders.
Expense reduction
In recognition of the accelerated shift in
customer preferences to electronic delivery
of our products and services, we continued
our branch optimization strategy in 2022,
consolidating seven branches into other
locations. This initiative is estimated to
save approximately $1.5 million in annual
operating expenses and was accomplished
while maintaining the high level of service our
customers expect.
1
In addition to the cost savings of our branch
optimization strategy, we also sought to take
advantage of operational synergies, consumer
lending expertise and our deposit base to grow
and expand our consumer lending programs
by merging our Morris Plan subsidiary into First
Financial Bank. This initiative will not only reduce
expenses but also provides a tremendous
opportunity for substantial growth in our
consumer lending portfolio.
Investing in our associates
Challenges, such as those we faced in 2022,
made us keenly aware of the needs of our
stakeholders, in particular our associates.
In the face of rising costs of living brought
on by inflation, we chose to invest in our
team by raising our minimum starting wage
approximately 30%. Our associates are our
most precious resource; investing in them is an
investment in our future.
Focus on community
Focusing on the communities we serve is the
cornerstone of our success. During 2022, we
continued to support our customers and the
communities in our service area through various
initiatives such as:
• $120 million in Community Reinvestment
Act (“CRA”) loans to 705 small businesses;
• $49 million in CRA small farm loans to 346
agricultural clients;
• $8.4 million in Community Development
Loans, including loans for affordable
housing, employment and workforce
programs for disabled individuals, parent-
child education services and delivery of
meals to homebound senior citizens;
• $25.6 million in loans to borrowers in low- or
moderate-income census tracts;
• $9.8 million in loans to philanthropic
and community organizations, including
affordable housing;
• Funding the Ivy Tech Students First
Scholarship, which awards nine $1,000
scholarships to students who are the first
generation in their family to attend college;
• Two $500 scholarships for graduating
seniors of the Todd County School District in
southwest Kentucky; and,
• The contribution of more than 9,000
volunteer hours donated by our generous
associates to numerous civic and charitable
organizations and to various fundraising and
social events throughout our footprint.
Above: Indirect Lending team. (Front) Kelly Russell, Leah Lewis, Kaylee Watson, and Heather Rooksberry. (Middle) McKayla Everhart, Katie Norris, Amanda Shaw, Sarah Switzer,
Alexis Perry, Amanda Lee, Christi Allen, and Jessica Johnson. (Back) Crystal Downing, Lena Khudayeva, Shawnee Fields, and Mike Mix.
2
ESG
Our commitment to fulfill our corporate
environmental, social and governance
responsibilities remained strong in 2022, as we
achieved success in many areas, including the
following:
• Our executive compensation program was
approved by more than 80% of the votes
cast by our shareholders;
• Each of the five Directors on the ballot were
reelected, with an average of more than 91%
support of votes cast;
• We increased our minimum hourly rate of
pay by approximately 30%;
• We hired a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
(DEI) Officer, a new position for our company;
• We finished 2022 with a workforce that is
77% gender or racially diverse;
• We partnered with Duke Energy and Willdan
Group, Inc. to invest in an energy-saving
program for our facilities. This investment is
expected to reduce our energy usage by an
estimated 350,000 kWh annually, saving us
approximately $100,000 in energy costs;
• We continued to review and optimize
our resources, combining seven branch
locations to better meet the financial
service needs of our customers while also
reducing our expected energy and resource
consumption. This branch optimization
plan is estimated to reduce our energy
consumption by 5%; and,
• We completed the merger between our
wholly-owned subsidiaries, The Morris
Plan Company of Terre Haute, Inc. and
First Financial Bank, which, among other
things, allowed us to take advantage of
operational synergies, lower expenses and
to substantially grow our consumer loan
portfolio.
You can learn more about our ESG strategy
in our 2022 ESG report, which is located at
first-online.bank/esg.
Commercial Lending team. (Front) Diane Dill, Phyllis Dowell, Amy Bursley, Lauren Edrington, Megan Langley, Jeanne Setzer and Tammy Wilguess. (Back) Will Pollock, Denise
McDowell, Josh All, Andrea May, Jim Winning, Mark Franklin, Jon Scherle, Brandon Bennett, Eric Nicholas, Rhonda Maurer, Steve Panagouleas, John Kempen.
3
Shareholder engagement
We were busy again this year, actively engaging
shareholders and potential shareholders.
Over the course of the year, we participated
in multiple one-on-one conversations with our
institutional and other prospective investors. In
September, our executive team participated in
the Raymond James US Bank Conference and in
November, we participated in the Piper Sandler
East Coast Financial Services Conference,
where we met with both current shareholders
and parties interested in the investment
opportunities First Financial Corporation
provides.
Recognition
First Financial and our hardworking associates
continue to be recognized for their achievements
from professional and rating organizations,
customers and the communities we serve.
Following are a few of their accolades:
• First Financial Bank was again named “One
of America’s Best Banks” by Forbes;
• For the 13th consecutive year, First Financial
Bank was named “Best Bank” in the Terre
Haute Tribune-Star Readers’ Choice Awards
and was also recognized as the “Best
Mortgage Company”, and as having “Best
Financial Advisor – John Ayre”;
• Cheatham County Exchange Newspaper,
Main Street Awards, named First Financial
Bank as “Best Bank”, “Best Mortgage
Lender” and “Best Investment Services/
Financial Planner” for the fifth year in a row;
• The nation’s largest independent bank rating
and research firm, BauerFinancial, Inc.,
awarded First Financial Bank a Five-Star
rating based on its strength and soundness;
and,
• Piper Sandler recognized First Financial
Bank as a Top 35 high-performing small-cap
bank in the U.S.
Reflections and gratitude
I would like to thank our Board of Directors for
their continued support, vision and commitment
to the success of First Financial Corporation
and to our goal of creating value for our
shareholders.
I also want to thank my associates and our
experienced management team for their focus,
dedication and hard work. Our success is only
possible through them. I cannot thank them
enough for meeting and successfully overcoming
the extraordinary challenges of the last three
years.
I want to thank our customers and the
communities we serve for their continued
business and support.
Finally, I want to thank you, my fellow
shareholders, for your confidence and investment
in First Financial Corporation. I hope each of you
will join us virtually at our 2023 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders on Wednesday, April 19, 2023,
at 11:00 AM (EST). You may join the meeting at
virtualshareholdermeeting.com/THFF2023.
Sincerely,
Norman L. Lowery
Chairman, CEO and President
4
34 Years of Consecutive
Dividend Increases
$3.1 Billion
Loans Outstanding
8.93%
Loan Growth
4.77%
Average Asset Growth
$4.4 Billion
Deposits
$71.1 Million
Net Income
$5.82
Fully Diluted
Earnings Per Share
$475 Million
Shareholders Equity
Record growth during challenging times.
5
Honoring first responders
First responders are called into our lives in
difficult moments. These trained and dedicated
professionals do so willingly and without regard
to their own personal safety.
Annually, First honors first responders such as
the Terre Haute Police Department, Vigo County
Sheriff’s Department and Terre Haute Fire
Department through sponsorship of their awards
banquets.
First is proud to play a small part in hosting
these celebrations and honoring these brave
men and women.
Below: John Ayre, Treasury Management Senior Investment Manager, congratulates
Vigo County Sheriff’s Department Deputy Bernie McGee and Deputy Robert Decker
following receipt of their Commendation Award.
6
Shining a light on great student athletes
First is proud to support students and to
recognize their accomplishments. Since its
inception in 2018, First Financial Bank has
sponsored the WKDZ Your Sports Edge Fan
Faves. This popular contest allows fans to vote
for their favorite high school student athletes
in Fall, Winter and Spring sports in Christian,
Caldwell, Lyon, Todd and Trigg Counties,
Kentucky.
All nominated student athletes are recognized
with an online profile and contest winners are
honored at a reception held each July.
Pictured above are Tina Owen, Banking Center
Manager at our Hopkinsville Boulevard branch,
and Autumn Bell.
Bell is a Kentucky 3A state champion in the
triple jump and Christian County High School
track and field record holder. She is now a
University of Louisville student athlete studying
Spanish and plans to become a translator
following completion of her degree.
7
Supporting classic high school basketball
and athletic programs
The 2022 Wabash Valley Classic is a 16-team
tournament composed of large and small
schools and is modeled after Indiana basketball
tournaments from the ‘50s and ‘60s. It is an
open-class competition where the only thing that
matters is bringing home the trophy.
In the tradition of exciting high school basketball,
the smaller schools prevailed in 2022 as the
Champion Linton-Stockton Miners met the
Bloomfield Cardinals in the Championship game,
proving once again that it’s not size that wins
tournaments, it’s the heart and spirit of the
players, coaches and fans.
The Wabash Valley Classic is fun for the
fans and the teams. First is proud to make it
possible.
We are keenly aware high school athletic
budgets are tight, and while the tournament is
entertaining, it also provides revenue for each
program’s athletic funding as 100% percent of
the net income is divided between each of the
participating teams. All advertising dollars raised
by a team are 100% returned to the team to
support their respective programs.
Below: Linton-Stockton Miner Joey Hart, a division one college player, dunks in the
championship game.
Right: Linton-Stockton Miner Logan Webb takes his shot over defending Bloomfield
Cardinal Hank Skomp.
8
9
Supporting athletic excellence and scholarship
The 2022 Wabash Valley All-Star Football game
brings together dozens of the best graduating
seniors from 36 Indiana and Illinois high schools
to play, what for some, will be their last football
game.
Wabash Valley Football Coaches Association
Hall of Fame inductees are recognized. First has
sponsored these events since their inception.
On the evening prior to the game, these athletes
and their coaches are honored at a banquet
where scholarships are awarded and new
Above: 2022 All-Star Braxton Sampson earned both the Foli Award for Most
Outstanding Performance and the Jay Barret Scholarship. Sampson played as a
middle linebacker and tight end during his time on the field as a Northview High
School Knight.
10
Teaming up to make an impact on youth
First sponsors and participates in golf outings
each year to support various charitable, civic
and educational causes.
These events provide critical funding for a broad
range of needs across the communities we
serve.
Since 1921, Gibault’s residential and community
based programs have served over 10,000
at-risk youth and their families. First has been
a longtime supporter of Gibault’s mission and
believes in their effort to effect positive change
and development of the young people entrusted
in their care.
One of the outings we supported in 2022 was
the Gibault Children’s Services Golf Scramble.
Gibault provides life-changing opportunities
for boys and girls requiring specialized care for
learning disabilities, behavioral, clinical, and
emotional challenges.
Below: Teams prepare to start their round at the 2022 Gibault Children’s
Services Golf Scramble.
11
11 11
Protecting personal identity
Identity theft is a growing and a daunting
challenge for all of us. First goes to great
lengths to protect the personal information of its
customers.
Each year, First Shred Days provide a free
opportunity for our customers and non-
customers alike to shred and dispose of
confidential documents.
Finding a location to safely dispose of important
and sensitive paper documents can be difficult
and concerning for some.
In 2022, we were able to shred more than 26
tons of paper at our Shred Day events.
Above: Salem team members and family Michael Waterson; Chris Waterson, Senior
Customer Service Representative; and Bryce Soger, Banking Center Manager, getting
ready to help Salem, IL Shred Day visitors prepare their documents for on-site
destruction.
12
Brightening the holidays
First has a rich history of supporting holiday
celebrations including community drives,
parades, light displays and more.
This year our Fulton team carried that spirit into
the Twin Cities of Fulton, KY and South Fulton,
TN Christmas Lights Parade, a new addition to
the annual Christmas in the Parks celebration.
Helping organizations spread Christmas cheer
such as Jubilee Christmas, Project Angel Tree,
and Toys for Tots.
These initiatives enable these organizations
across our footprint to provide underprivileged
families with Christmas gifts for their children.
In addition to participating in and sponsoring
special events, First banking centers also serve
as toy drive drop-off locations for organizations
Below: Fulton team members Sandy Whitlock, Branch Operations and Training
Specialist; Dana Swearingen, Customer Service Representative; and Mary Margaret
Joyner, Banking Center Manager, prepare for the Twin Cities Christmas Lights Parade
with their furry companions ready to help spread holiday cheer.
13
Strengthening community bonds
First associates from our Terre Haute locations
joined hundreds in the eighth annual Diversity
Walk.
The 1.5 mile Diversity Walk, themed “Walk
the Walk”, welcomed all people and included
participants of varying ages, races, creeds,
colors, orientations, and abilities.
The Walk’s goals include unifying the community,
spreading messages of respect and acceptance,
and celebrating the differences that make the
Terre Haute community stronger.
Right: Melvin L. Burks, CEO of Hamilton Center, Inc. shares remarks before the 2022 Terre Haute Diversity Walk gets underway. Looking on are Terry Modesitt, Vigo County
Prosecutor (third from right); Terre Haute Mayor Duke Bennett (second from right); and Norman D. Lowery, First Chief Operations Officer (right).
Photo by Joseph C. Garza, Chief Photographer, courtesy of Tribune-Star.
Aleks Cirulis, Assistant General Counsel, his son Raymond on his shoulders, his spouse Rika and oldest son Walter by
his side (third row, left), join the First team and community as Diversity Walk participants make their way from First’s
headquarters and down Wabash Avenue. The 1.5 mile journey moved through parts of downtown Terre Haute and the Indiana
State University campus. Photo by Joseph C. Garza, Chief Photographer, courtesy of Tribune-Star.
14
15
Helping United Way make a difference
United Way grants directly support community
organizations and programming built around
providing safe, affordable housing; quality
childcare and education; adequate food; reliable
health care and transportation; other notable
causes; and serves as a catalyst to move
individuals and families out of financial struggles
and into stability.
We are proud our corporate and individual
contributions help provide greatly needed
resources. Below are a few of the programs and
agencies United Way assists, and which we are
pleased to support:
Boys and Girls Clubs
A safe haven for children, providing tutoring,
mentoring, meals, and a place to just be a kid.
Bottom Line Diaper Bank |
Champaign-Urbana, IL
Raises awareness about infant needs and
how they affect low-income families, and helps
alleviate those needs in the community.
American Red Cross
Assists victims of house and apartment fires
and natural or man-made disasters.
VanGo Public Transportation | Vincennes, IN
Community transportation network connecting
individuals with needed social and health
services no matter their age or abilities.
Meals on Wheels
Enhances the quality of health for the elderly,
disabled, sick, homebound and high-risk
children by delivering nutritious meals and
providing well-being checks.
Clarksville-Montgomery County
Adult Literacy Council | Clarksville, TN
Provides free one-on-one and small group
tutoring for adults who want to learn or improve
their reading and language skills, and prepare
for their high school equivalency test.
Boy and Girl Scouts
Provides programs that build confidence,
courage, character, and leadership so youth
may become participating citizens and care for
others as well as themselves.
Pathways Day Center | Terre Haute, IN
A collaboration of community agencies assisting
low-income families who are experiencing
homelessness, and put them on a path to
develop independence.
The Salvation Army
Meeting human need wherever, whenever, and
however they can.
Imagination Library | Hopkinsville, KY
A literacy program that mails a book to young
readers each month to build reading proficiency.
Legal Aid Society
Provides quality, meaningful, civil legal services
to low-income residents.
Albion Fellows Bacon Center | Evansville, IN
Preventing domestic and sexual violence;
empowering victims through advocacy,
education, support services and collaborative
partnerships.
Right: Autumn Dowell, Pathways Lead Case Manager; and Chris Moore (First Marketing Officer), Reach Services Board President, discuss weather emergency operations after the
Reach Services Pathways Day Center, a United Way grant recipient, is opened as a temporary shelter due to extremely cold temperatures.
16
17
Providing an early start to financial literacy
We believe financial literacy is extremely
important. To do so, First partners with local
schools in a variety of ways to introduce
students to banking as a financial literacy
learning component.
One example is a tour by Rhythm and Rhyme
Preschool students who learned about our
Washington, IN banking center as a part of their
alphabet lesson.
The Washington First associates created signs
with the letter “B” so children could find and
practice letter usage while touring different
areas of the bank. For added fun, each student
left with a First coloring book and candies whose
names start with “B”.
Below: Carol Grannan, Washington, IN Teller/CSR, shares with her Rhythm
and Rhyme Preschool pupils how safe deposit boxes are used to protect
important things you want to keep safe.
18
Stepping forward to promote awareness
First associates support and participate in a
variety of charitable walks and runs to raise
funds, promote awareness, and to get a little fun
and exercise at the same time.
Events include the Terre Haute Turkey Trot
supporting local food pantries; Walk to End
Alzheimer’s; Take Steps Walk for the Crohn’s and
Colitis Foundation of America and more.
Our Washington, IN team sponsored and
participated in the 2022 Developmental
Services, Inc. (DSI) Fun Run, Walk & Roll 5K.
DSI provides services for adults and children
with mental, physical, and emotional disabilities
in more than 50 Indiana counties. These
services include early intervention for infants
and toddlers, residential living options, job
training, placement and follow-along, respite
care, family support, individualized community-
based services and more.
Above: Washington teammates and community members walk between rain drops
with smiles on their faces to support KidStuff Preschool.
19
Striving for the best in customer service
Our associates are our greatest asset and the
face of the corporation. They aim to provide our
customers the best experience possible each
and every day. We recognize their hard work
and dedication, but it is always nice when the
communities we serve also recognize them.
Courier Reader’s Choice (IL), and Tribune-Star
Readers’ Choice (IL/IN).
Whether nominated, selected as a finalist, or
honored as “The Best”, we’re proud to celebrate
our associates and their accomplishments.
In 2022, First was nominated for several service
categories in local community awards contests
including Best of Western Kentucky, Best of
Bowling Green (KY), Cheatham County Exchange
Main Street (TN), Danville Register and Bee
Readers’ Choice (IL), Journal Gazette & Times
Above: Ashley Buker, Customer Service Representative, Christina Green, Banking
Center Manager, and Brittany Geddes, Teller, at our Kingston Springs, TN location in
celebration of the 2022 Cheatham County Exchange Main Street Awards.
20
Best Bank
Cheatham County Exchange Main Street Awards
Tribune-Star Readers’ Choice Awards
Best Mortgage Lender
Cheatham County Exchange Main Street Awards
Best Mortgage Company
Tribune-Star Readers’ Choice Awards
Best Investment Services/
Financial Planner
Cheatham County Exchange Main Street Awards
Best Financial Advisor
John Ayre
Tribune-Star Readers’ Choice Awards
The Mortgage Lending team was recognized as a Best Mortgage provider in both the Cheatham County Exchange Main Street Awards and Tribune-Star Readers’
Choice Awards. (Front) Rebecca Morgan, Debbe McFall, Marcia Carns, Cindy Porter, Irene Ang, Misty Peelman, Brooke Wilkie, Kelley Cooper, Lynn Caudill,
Brandi Miller, Margret Brooks, Angie Marina, David Gedde. (Back) Howard Mills, Bruce Wilcox, Moira Nichols, Brandi Cheesman, Courtney Strain, Haley Marina-
Logan, Matthew Jackson, Amanda Osborn, Tyler Wilcox, Kathie Jackson, Jeff Tarrh.
21
Guiding customers toward financial security
Retirement savings and investments contribute
to a secure future. Making decisions about them
is often difficult to navigate.
Our Trust and Asset Management team is known
for outstanding customer care and ability to help
each individual no matter the size of his or her
portfolio.
John Ayre, Trust and Asset Management Senior
Investment Manager, has decades of experience
that has helped guide our customers toward
their goals for the last seven years.
22
His commitment to the financial well-being of
his customers was recognized with an individual
nomination and award as the best financial
adviser in the 2022 Tribune-Star Readers’
Choice Awards.
Above: John Ayre, Trust and Asset Management Senior Investment Manager
One of America’s Best Banks
Each year, Forbes in conjunction with market
research firm Statista, conducts in-depth
interviews of more than 26,000 U.S. citizens
from all 50 states about where they maintain
financial accounts.
Customers provide an overall satisfaction score
and are asked if they would recommend their
institution to family and friends.
They also respond to detailed questions about
satisfaction in six areas including trust, terms
and conditions (including reasonable and
transparent fees), services at their local banking
centers, digital services, customer service, and
financial advice.
This annual research led to First being
recognized again in 2022 as one of the best
banks in America.
Piper Sandler
BauerFinancial
Top 35 Performing Small-cap Bank
Piper Sandler Companies, an American
independent investment bank and financial
services company, recognized First as a
top 35 performing small-cap bank in the
country.
To earn this award, companies must meet
various performance criteria related to
growth, profitability, credit quality and
capital strength. Some of the hurdles
include outperforming the industry
medians for deposit, loan and earnings per
share growth, as well as maintaining a ratio
for nonperforming assets to loans of one
percent or less.
Five-Star Rating
Once again, the nation’s largest independent
bank rating and research firm, BauerFinancial,
Inc., awarded First a Five-Star rating based on
our strength and soundness.
BauerFinancial rated financial institutions are
evaluated by criteria including capital ratio,
profitability/loss trend, evaluating the level of
delinquent loans, chargeoffs and repossessed
assets, the market versus book value of the
investment portfolio, regulatory supervisory
agreements, the community reinvestment
rating (CRA), historical data and liquidity.
23
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-16759
FIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana
(State of Incorporation)
One First Financial Plaza
Terre Haute, Indiana
(Address of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)
35-1546989
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
47807
(Zip Code)
(812) 238-6000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.125 per share
THFF
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known-seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
such files). Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act of 1934.
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Emerging growth company
☐ Accelerated filer
☐ Smaller reporting company
☐
☑
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any
new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal
control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that
prepared or issued its audit report. ☑
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in
the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation
received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
As of June 30, 2022 the aggregate market value of the stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the average bid and ask prices of such
stock was $490,666,197. (For purposes of this calculation, the Corporation excluded the stock owned by certain beneficial owners and management
and the Corporation’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan.)
Shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2023—12,065,888 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement for the First Financial Corporation Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 19, 2023 are
incorporated by reference into Part III.
FIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
2022 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. Business
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Signatures
Exhibit 21
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2
PAGE
4
16
27
27
29
29
30
32
33
44
45
96
96
97
97
97
97
98
98
99
99
101
3
FIRST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
2022 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
PART I
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
A cautionary note about forward-looking statements: In its oral and written communication, First Financial Corporation from time to
time includes forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-
looking statements can include statements about estimated cost savings, plans and objectives for future operations and expectations
about performance, as well as economic and market conditions and trends. They often can be identified by the use of words such as
“expect,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “project,” “estimate,” “believe” or “anticipate” or words of similar import. By their nature, forward-
looking statements are based on assumptions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Actual results may differ materially
from those contained in the forward-looking statement. First Financial Corporation may include forward-looking statements in filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in other written materials such as this Annual Report and in oral statements made by
senior management to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others. It is intended that these forward-looking statements
speak only as of the date they are made, and First Financial Corporation undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking
statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the forward-looking statement is made or to reflect the occurrence
of unanticipated events.
The discussion in Item 1A (Risk Factors) and Item 7 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial
Condition) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, lists some of the factors which could cause actual results to vary materially from those
in any forward-looking statements. Other uncertainties which could affect First Financial Corporation’s future performance include the
effects of competition, technological changes and regulatory developments; changes in fiscal, monetary and tax policies; market,
economic, operational, liquidity, credit and interest rate risks associated with First Financial Corporation’s business; inflation;
competition in the financial services industry; changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally, resulting in,
among other things, credit quality deterioration; and changes in securities markets. Investors should consider these risks, uncertainties
and other factors in addition to those mentioned by First Financial Corporation in its other filings from time to time when considering
any forward-looking statement.
GENERAL
First Financial Corporation (the “Corporation”) is a financial holding company. The Corporation was originally organized as an Indiana
corporation in 1984 to operate as a bank holding company.
The Corporation, which is headquartered in Terre Haute, Indiana, offers a wide variety of financial services including commercial,
mortgage and consumer lending, lease financing, trust account services, depositor services and insurance services through its two
subsidiaries. At the close of business in 2022 the Corporation and its subsidiaries had 900 full-time equivalent employees.
The risk characteristics of each loan portfolio segment are as follows:
Commercial
Commercial loans are predominately loans to expand a business or finance asset purchases. The underlying risk in the Commercial loan
segment is primarily a function of the reliability and sustainability of the cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying
collateral securing the transaction. From time to time, the cash flows of borrowers may be less than historical or as planned. In addition,
the underlying collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets financed or other
business assets and most commercial loans are further supported by a personal guarantee. However, in some instances, short term loans
are made on an unsecured basis. Agriculture production loans are typically secured by growing crops and generally secured by other
assets such as farm equipment. Production loans are subject to weather and market pricing risks. The Corporation has established
underwriting standards and guidelines for all commercial loan types.
4
The Corporation strives to maintain a geographically diverse commercial real estate portfolio. Commercial real estate loans are primarily
underwritten based upon the cash flows of the underlying real estate or from the cash flows of the business conducted at the real estate.
Generally, these types of loans will be fully guaranteed by the principal owners of the real estate and loan amounts must be supported
by adequate collateral value. Commercial real estate loans may be adversely affected by factors in the local market, the regional
economy, or industry specific factors. In addition, Commercial Construction loans are a specific type of commercial real estate loan
which inherently carry more risk than loans for completed projects. Since these types of loans are underwritten utilizing estimated costs,
feasibility studies, and estimated absorption rates, the underlying value of the project may change based upon the inaccuracy of these
projections. Commercial construction loans are closely monitored, subject to industry standards, and disbursements are controlled during
the construction process.
Residential
Retail real estate mortgages that are secured by 1-4 family residences are generally owner occupied and include residential real estate
and residential real estate construction loans. The Corporation typically establishes a maximum loan-to-value ratio and generally requires
private mortgage insurance if the ratio is exceeded. The Corporation sells substantially all of its long-term fixed mortgages to secondary
market purchasers. Mortgages sold to secondary market purchasers are underwritten to specific guidelines. The Corporation originates
some mortgages that are maintained in the bank’s loan portfolio. Portfolio loans are generally adjustable rate mortgages and are
underwritten to conform to Qualified Mortgage standards. Several factors are considered in underwriting all Mortgages including the
value of the underlying real estate, debt-to-income ratio and credit history of the borrower. Repayment is primarily dependent upon the
personal income of the borrower and can be impacted by changes in borrower’s circumstances such as changes in employment status
and changes in real estate property values. Risk is mitigated by the sale of substantially all long-term fixed rate mortgages, the
underwriting of portfolio loans to Qualified Mortgage standards and the fact that mortgages are generally smaller individual amounts
spread over a large number of borrowers.
Consumer
The consumer portfolio primarily consists of home equity loans and lines (typically secured by a subordinate lien on a 1-4 family
residence), secured loans (typically secured by automobiles, boats, recreational vehicles, or motorcycles), cash/CD secured, and
unsecured loans. Pricing, loan terms, and loan to value guidelines vary by product line. The underlying value of collateral dependent
loans may vary based on a number of economic conditions, including fluctuations in home prices and unemployment levels.
Underwriting of consumer loans is based on the individual credit profile and analysis of the debt repayment capacity for each borrower.
Payments for consumer loans is typically set-up on equal monthly installments, however, future repayment may be impacted by a change
in economic conditions or a change in the personal income levels of individual customers. Overall risks within the consumer portfolio
are mitigated by the mix of various loan products, lending in various markets and the overall make-up of the portfolio (small loan sizes
and a large number of individual borrowers).
COMPANY PROFILE
First Financial Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) is the largest bank in Vigo County, Ind. It operates nine full-service banking branches within
the county; three in Clay County, Ind.; one in Daviess County, Ind.; one in Greene County, Ind.; one in Knox County, Ind.; two in Parke
County, Ind.; one in Putnam County, Ind., three in Sullivan County, Ind.; one in Vanderburgh, County, Ind.; three in Vermillion County,
Ind.; four in Champaign County, Illinois; one in Clark County, Ill.; two in Coles County, Ill.; two in Crawford County, Ill.; one in
Franklin County, Ill.; one in Jasper County, Ill.; two in Jefferson County, Ill.; one in Lawrence County, Ill.; two in Livingston County,
Ill.; two in Marion County, Ill.; two in McLean County, Ill.; one in Richland County, Ill.; six in Vermilion County, Ill.; one in Wayne
County, Ill; one in Breckinridge County, Kentucky; two in Calloway County, Ky; three in Christian County, Ky; two in Fulton County,
Ky; two in Hancock County, Ky; two in Hopkins County, Ky; two in Marshall County, Ky; one in Todd County, Ky; one in Trigg
County, Ky; two in Warren County, Ky; three in Cheatham County, Tennessee; one in Houston County, Tn; and three in Montgomery
County, Tn. There are five loan production offices, one in Hamilton County, Indiana; one in Monroe County, Indiana; one in
Vanderburgh County, Indiana; one in Rutherford County, Tennessee; and one in Williamson County, Tn. In addition to its branches, it
has a main office in downtown Terre Haute and a 50,000-square-foot commercial building on South Third Street in Terre Haute, which
serves as the Corporation’s operations center and provides additional office space. FFB Risk Management Co., Inc. located in Las
Vegas, Nevada is a captive insurance subsidiary which insures various liability and property damage policies for First Financial
Corporation subsidiaries. JBMM, LLC and Fort Webb LP, LLC are both located in Christian County, Ky.
5
COMPETITION
First Financial Bank faces competition from other financial institutions. These competitors consist of commercial banks, a mutual
savings bank and other financial institutions, including consumer finance companies, insurance companies, brokerage firms and credit
unions.
The Corporation’s business activities are centered in west-central Indiana, east-central Illinois, western Kentucky, and central Tennessee.
The Corporation has no foreign activities.
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION
The Corporation and its subsidiaries operate in highly regulated environments and are subject to supervision and regulation by several
governmental regulatory agencies, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”), the Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). The laws and regulations
established by these agencies are generally intended to protect depositors, not shareholders. Changes in applicable laws, regulations,
governmental policies, income tax laws and accounting principles may have a material effect on the Corporation’s business and
prospects. The following summary is qualified by reference to the statutory and regulatory provisions discussed.
The Dodd-Frank Act
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act” or “Dodd-Frank”), which was enacted in
July 2010, significantly restructured the financial regulatory regime in the United States. Although the Dodd-Frank Act’s provisions
that have received the most public attention generally have been those applying to or more likely to affect larger institutions such as
bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, it contains numerous other provisions that affect all bank
holding companies and banks, including the Corporation and the Bank.
The Volcker Rule
The Dodd-Frank Act requires the federal financial regulatory agencies to adopt rules that prohibit banks and their affiliates from
engaging in proprietary trading and investing in and sponsoring certain unregistered investment companies (defined as hedge funds and
private equity funds). The statutory provision is commonly called the “Volcker Rule”. The Corporation does not engage in the businesses
prohibited by the Volcker Rule; therefore, the Volcker Rule does not have a material effect on the operations of the Corporation and its
subsidiaries.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), created by the Dodd-Frank Act, is responsible for administering federal
consumer financial protection laws. The CFPB, which began operations on July 21, 2011, is an independent bureau within the Federal
Reserve and has broad rule-making, supervisory and examination authority to set and enforce rules in the consumer protection area over
financial institutions that have assets of $10 billion or more. The CFPB also has data collecting powers for fair lending purposes for
both small business and mortgage loans, as well as authority to prevent unfair, deceptive and abusive practices. Abusive acts or practices
are defined as those that:
(1)
materially interfere with a consumer’s ability to understand a term or condition of a consumer financial product or
service, or
(2)
take unreasonable advantage of a consumer’s:
•
•
•
lack of financial savvy,
inability to protect himself in the selection or use of consumer financial products or services, or
reasonable reliance on a covered entity to act in the consumer’s interests.
6
The CFPB has the authority to investigate possible violations of federal consumer financial law, hold hearings and commence civil
litigation. The CFPB can issue cease-and-desist orders against banks and other entities that violate consumer financial laws. The CFPB
may also institute a civil action against an entity in violation of federal consumer financial law in order to impose a civil penalty or an
injunction.
BASEL III
In July 2013, the federal banking agencies published the Basel III Capital Rules establishing a new comprehensive capital framework
for U.S. banking organizations. The rules implement the Basel Committee’s December 2010 framework known as “Basel III” for
strengthening international capital standards as well as certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Basel III Capital Rules became effective on January 1, 2015 (subject to a phase-in period) and, among other things, introduced a
new capital measure known as “Common Equity Tier 1” (“CET1”), which generally consists of common equity Tier 1 capital
instruments and related surplus, retained earnings, and common equity Tier 1 minority interests, minus certain adjustments and
deductions.
The Basel III Capital Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. These include, for example, the
requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences that could not be realized through net
operating loss carrybacks and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that
any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15% of CET1. Under the former capital
standards, the effects of accumulated other comprehensive income items included in capital were excluded for the purposes of
determining regulatory capital ratios. Under the Basel III Capital Rules, the effects of certain accumulated other comprehensive items
are not excluded; however, non-advanced approaches banking organizations, including the Corporation, may make a one-time
permanent election to continue to exclude these items. The Corporation and the Bank made this election in order to avoid significant
variations in the level of capital depending upon the impact of interest rate fluctuations on the fair value of the Corporation’s available-
for-sale securities portfolio. The Basel III Capital Rules also preclude certain hybrid securities, such as trust preferred securities, as Tier
1 capital of bank holding companies, subject to phase-out. The Corporation has no trust preferred securities.
The Basel III Capital Rules prescribe a standardized approach for risk weightings that expand the risk-weighting categories from the
current four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%) to a much larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories,
depending on the nature of the assets, generally ranging from 0% for U.S. government and agency securities, to 600% for certain equity
exposures, and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset categories. Specifics changes from former capital rules impacting
the Corporation’s determination of risk-weighted assets include, among other things:
• Applying a 150% risk weight instead of a 100% risk weight for certain high volatility commercial real estate acquisition,
development and construction loans;
• Assigning a 150% risk weight to exposures (other than residential mortgage exposures) that are 90 days past due;
• Providing for a 20% credit conversion factor for the unused portion of a commitment with an original maturity of one year or
less that is not unconditionally cancellable (currently set at 0%); and
• Providing for a risk weight, generally not less than 20% with certain exceptions, for securities lending transactions based on
the risk weight category of the underlying collateral securing the transaction.
Fully phased in on January 1, 2019, the Basel III Capital Rules require the Corporation and its banking subsidiaries to maintain:
•
a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (which is added
to the 4.5% CET1 ratio as that buffer is phased in, effectively resulting in a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of
at least 7% upon full implementation);
7
•
•
a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added
to the 6.0% Tier 1 capital ratio as that buffer is phased in, effectively resulting in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5% upon
full implementation);
a minimum ratio of Total capital (that is, Tier 1 plus Tier 2) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation
buffer (which is added to the 8.0% total capital ratio as that buffer is phased in, effectively resulting in a minimum total capital
ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation), and
•
a minimum leverage ratio of 4%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets.
The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1
to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the conservation buffer (or below the combined capital conservation buffer and
countercyclical capital buffer, when the latter is applied) will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based
on the amount of the shortfall.
Under the Basel III Capital Rules, the minimum capital ratios as of January 1, 2019 are as follows:
•
•
•
7.00% CET1 to risk-weighted assets;
8.50% Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets; and
10.50% Total capital to risk-weighted assets.
Certain regulatory capital ratios for the Corporation as of December 31, 2022, are shown below:
•
•
•
•
13.58% CET1 to risk-weighted assets;
13.58% Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets;
14.61% Total capital to risk-weighted assets; and
10.78% leverage ratio.
Certain regulatory capital ratios for the Bank as of December 31, 2022, are shown below:
•
•
•
•
12.09% CET1 to risk-weighted assets;
12.09% Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets;
13.14% Total capital to risk-weighted assets; and
9.50% leverage ratio.
The Corporation
The Bank Holding Company Act. Because the Corporation owns all of the outstanding capital stock of the Bank, it is registered as a
bank holding company under the Federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (“Act”) and is subject to periodic examination by the
Federal Reserve and required to file periodic reports of its operations and any additional information that the Federal Reserve may
require.
In general, the Act limits the business of bank holding companies to banking, managing or controlling banks and other activities that
the Federal Reserve has determined to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident thereto. In addition, bank holding
companies that qualify and elect to be financial holding companies such as the Corporation, may engage in any activity, or acquire and
8
retain the shares of a company engaged in any activity, that is either (i) financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity (as
determined by the Federal Reserve in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury) or (ii) complementary to a financial activity and
does not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally (as solely
determined by the Federal Reserve), without prior approval of the Federal Reserve.
Investments, Control, and Activities. With some limited exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding
company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before acquiring another bank holding company or acquiring more than
five percent of the voting shares of a bank (unless it already owns or controls the majority of such shares).
Bank holding companies are prohibited, with certain limited exceptions, from engaging in activities other than those of banking or of
managing or controlling banks. They are also prohibited from acquiring or retaining direct or indirect ownership or control of voting
shares or assets of any company which is not a bank or bank holding company, other than subsidiary companies furnishing services to
or performing services for their subsidiaries, and other subsidiaries engaged in activities which the Federal Reserve determines to be so
closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be incidental to these operations. The Bank Holding Company Act
does not place territorial restrictions on the activities of such nonbanking-related activities.
Bank holding companies which meet certain management, capital, and Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”) standards may
elect to become a financial holding company, which would allow them to engage in a substantially broader range of non-banking
activities than is permitted for a bank holding company, including insurance underwriting and making merchant banking investments in
commercial and financial companies.
The Corporation is a financial holding company (“FHC”) within the meaning of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act
of 1999 (“GLB Act”). The GLB Act restricts the business of FHC’s to financial and related activities, and provides the following:
•
•
•
•
it allows bank holding companies that qualify as “financial holding companies” to engage in a broad range of financial and
related activities;
it allows insurers and other financial services companies to acquire banks;
it removes various restrictions that applied to bank holding company ownership of securities firms and mutual fund advisory
companies; and
it establishes the overall regulatory structure applicable to bank holding companies that also engage in insurance and securities
operations.
As a qualified FHC, the Corporation is eligible to engage in, or acquire companies engaged in, the broader range of activities that are
permitted by the GLB Act. These activities include those that are determined to be “financial in nature,” including insurance
underwriting, securities underwriting and dealing, and making merchant banking investments in commercial and financial companies.
If any of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries ceases to be “well capitalized” or “well managed” under applicable regulatory standards,
the Federal Reserve Board may, among other things, place limitations on the Corporation’s ability to conduct these broader financial
activities or, if the deficiencies persist, require the divestiture of the banking subsidiary. In addition, if any of the Corporation’s banking
subsidiaries receives a rating of less than satisfactory under the CRA, the Corporation would be prohibited from engaging in any
additional activities other than those permissible for bank holding companies that are not financial holding companies. The Corporation’s
banking subsidiaries currently meet these capital, management and CRA requirements.
Dividends. The Federal Reserve’s policy is that a bank holding company experiencing earnings weakness should not pay cash dividends
exceeding its net income or which could only be funded in ways that weaken the bank holding company’s financial health, such as by
borrowing. Additionally, the Federal Reserve possesses enforcement powers over bank holding companies and their non-bank
subsidiaries to prevent or remedy actions that represent unsafe or unsound practices or violations of applicable statutes and regulations.
Among these powers is the ability to proscribe the payment of dividends by banks and bank holding companies.
Source of Strength. In accordance with Federal Reserve policy, the Corporation is expected to act as a source of financial strength to the
Bank and to commit resources to support the Bank in circumstances in which the Corporation might not otherwise do so.
9
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) represents a comprehensive revision of laws
affecting corporate governance, accounting obligations and corporate reporting. Among other requirements, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
established: (i) requirements for audit committees of public companies, including independence and expertise standards; (ii) additional
responsibilities regarding financial statements for the chief executive officers and chief financial officers of reporting companies;
(iii) standards for auditors and regulation of audits; (iv) increased disclosure and reporting obligations for reporting companies regarding
various matters relating to corporate governance, and (v) new and increased civil and criminal penalties for violation of the securities
laws.
The Bank
General Regulatory Supervision. The Bank is a national bank organized under the laws of the United States of America and is subject
to the supervision of the OCC, whose examiners conduct periodic examinations of the Bank. The Bank must undergo regular on-site
examinations by the OCC and must submit quarterly and annual reports to the OCC concerning its activities and financial condition.
The deposits of the Bank are insured by the FDIC and are subject to the FDIC’s rules and regulations respecting the insurance of deposits.
See “Deposit Insurance”.
Lending Limits. The total loans and extensions of credit to a borrower outstanding at one time and not fully secured may not exceed
15 percent of the bank’s capital and unimpaired surplus. In addition, the total amount of outstanding loans and extensions of credit to
any borrower outstanding at one time and fully secured by readily marketable collateral may not exceed 10 percent of the unimpaired
capital and unimpaired surplus of the bank (this limitation is separate from and in addition to the above limitation). If a loan is secured
by United States obligations, such as treasury bills, it is not subject to this legal lending limit.
Deposit Insurance. The Dodd-Frank Act has permanently increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance for financial institutions
per insured depositor to $250,000.
The deposits of the Bank are insured up to the applicable limits under the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”). The FDIC maintains the DIF
by assessing depository institutions an insurance premium. Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC is required to set a DIF reserve
ratio of 1.35% of estimated insured deposits and was required to achieve this ratio by September 30, 2020.
In connection with the Dodd-Frank Act’s requirement that insurance assessments be based on assets, the FDIC bases assessments on an
institution’s average consolidated assets (less average tangible equity) as opposed to its deposit level. This may shift the burden of
deposit premiums toward larger depository institutions which rely on funding sources other than U.S. deposits.
Under the FDIC’s risk-based assessment system, insured institutions are required to pay deposit insurance premiums based on the risk
that each institution poses to the DIF. An institution’s risk to the DIF is measured by its regulatory capital levels, supervisory evaluations,
and certain other factors. An institution’s assessment rate depends upon the risk category to which it is assigned. As noted above,
pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC will calculate an institution’s assessment level based on its total average consolidated assets
during the assessment period less average tangible equity (i.e., Tier 1 capital) as opposed to an institution’s deposit level which was the
previous basis for calculating insurance assessments. Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, institutions will be placed into one of four risk
categories for purposes of determining the institution’s actual assessment rate. The FDIC will determine the risk category based on the
institution’s capital position (well capitalized, adequately capitalized, or undercapitalized) and supervisory condition (based on exam
reports and related information provided by the institution’s primary federal regulator). The Bank paid a total FDIC assessment of $2.0
million in 2022.
In addition to the FDIC insurance premiums, the Bank is required to make quarterly payments on bonds issued by the Financing
Corporation (“FICO”), an agency of the Federal government established to recapitalize a predecessor deposit insurance fund. These
assessments will continue until the FICO bonds are repaid.
Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders. Pursuant to Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W, the Bank is
subject to limitations on the amount of loans or extensions of credit to, or investments in, or certain other transactions with, affiliates
(including the Corporation) and insiders and on the amount of advances to third parties collateralized by the securities or obligations of
affiliates. Furthermore, within the foregoing limitations as to amount, each covered transaction must meet specified collateral
requirements. Compliance is also required with certain provisions designed to avoid the taking of low quality assets. The Bank is also
10
prohibited from engaging in certain transactions with certain affiliates and insiders unless the transactions are on terms substantially the
same, or at least as favorable to such institution or its subsidiaries, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with
nonaffiliated companies.
Extensions of credit by the Bank to its executive officers, directors, certain principal shareholders, and their related interests must:
•
be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with third parties; and
•
not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.
The Dodd-Frank Act also included specific changes to the law related to the definition of a “covered transaction” in Sections 23A and
23B and limitations on asset purchases from insiders. With respect to the definition of a “covered transaction,” the Dodd-Frank Act now
defines that term to include the acceptance of debt obligations issued by an affiliate as collateral for an institution’s loan or extension of
credit to another person or company. In addition, a “derivative transaction” with an affiliate is now deemed to be a “covered transaction”
to the extent that such a transaction causes an institution or its subsidiary to have a credit exposure to the affiliate. A separate provision
of the Dodd-Frank Act states that an insured depository institution may not “purchase an asset from, or sell an asset to” a bank insider
(or their related interests) unless (1) the transaction is conducted on market terms between the parties and (2) if the proposed transaction
represents more than 10 percent of the capital stock and surplus of the insured institution, it has been approved in advance by a majority
of the institution’s non-interested directors.
Dividends. Applicable law provides that a financial institution, such as the Bank, may pay dividends from its undivided profits in an
amount declared by its Board of Directors, subject to prior regulatory approval if the proposed dividend, when added to all prior
dividends declared during the current calendar year, would be greater than the current year’s net income and retained earnings for the
previous two calendar years.
Federal law generally prohibits the Bank from paying a dividend to the Corporation if it would thereafter be undercapitalized. The FDIC
may prevent a financial institution from paying dividends if it is in default of payment of any assessment due to the FDIC. In addition,
payment of dividends by a bank may be prevented by the applicable federal regulatory authority if such payment is determined, by
reason of the financial condition of such bank, to be an unsafe and unsound banking practice.
Community Reinvestment Act. The CRA requires that the federal banking regulators evaluate the records of a financial institution in
meeting the credit needs of its local community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. These factors are also considered
in evaluating mergers, acquisitions, and applications to open a branch or facility. Failure to adequately meet these criteria could result
in the imposition of additional requirements and limitations on the Bank.
Interest Rate and Market Risk. The federal bank regulators also have issued a joint policy statement to provide guidance on sound
practices for managing interest rate risk. The statement sets forth the factors the federal regulatory examiners will use to determine the
adequacy of a bank’s capital for interest rate risk. These qualitative factors include the adequacy and effectiveness of the bank’s internal
interest rate risk management process and the level of interest rate exposure. Other qualitative factors that will be considered include the
size of the bank, the nature and complexity of its activities, the adequacy of its capital and earnings in relation to the bank’s overall risk
profile, and its earning exposure to interest rate movements. The interagency supervisory policy statement describes the responsibilities
of a bank’s board of directors in implementing a risk management process and the requirements of the bank’s senior management in
ensuring the effective management of interest rate risk. Further, the statement specifies the elements that a risk management process
must contain.
The federal banking regulators have also issued regulations revising the risk-based capital standards to include a supervisory framework
for measuring market risk. The effect of these regulations is that any bank holding company or bank which has significant exposure to
market risk must measure such risk using its own internal model, subject to the requirements contained in the regulations, and must
maintain adequate capital to support that exposure. These regulations apply to any bank holding company or bank whose trading activity
equals 10% or more of its total assets, or whose trading activity equals $1 billion or more. Examiners may require a bank holding
company or bank that does not meet the applicability criteria to comply with the capital requirements if necessary for safety and
soundness purposes. These regulations contain supplemental rules to determine qualifying and excess capital, calculate risk-weighted
assets, calculate market risk-equivalent assets and calculate risk-based capital ratios adjusted for market risk.
11
Prompt Corrective Action. The Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended (“FDIA”), requires among other things, the federal banking
agencies to take “prompt corrective action” in respect of depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. The
FDIA includes the following five capital tiers: “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly
undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” A depository institution’s capital tier will depend upon how its capital levels
compare with various relevant capital measures and certain other factors, as established by regulation. The relevant capital measures are
the total risk-based capital ratio, the Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, the common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and the leverage
ratio.
A bank will be (i) “well capitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of 8.0% or greater, a common equity tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.5% or greater and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater, and
is not subject to any order or written directive by any such regulatory authority to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any
capital measure; (ii) “adequately capitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, a common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.5% or greater and a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater
and is not “well capitalized”; (iii) “undercapitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 8.0%, a Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.5%, or a leverage ratio of less than 4.0%;
(iv) “significantly undercapitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of less than 4.5%, a common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 3.0%, or a leverage ratio of less than 3.0%; and
(v) “critically undercapitalized” if the institution’s tangible equity is equal to or less than 2.0% of average quarterly tangible assets. An
institution may be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than indicated by its capital ratios if it is determined
to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with respect to certain matters. A bank’s
capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying prompt corrective action regulations, and the capital category may not
constitute an accurate representation of the bank’s overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes.
The FDIA generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distributions (including payment of a dividend) or paying
any management fee to its parent holding company if the depository institution would thereafter be “undercapitalized.”
“Undercapitalized” institutions are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit a capital restoration plan. The agencies may
not accept such a plan without determining, among other things, that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to succeed
in restoring the depository institution’s capital. In addition, for a capital restoration plan to be acceptable, the depository institution’s
parent holding company must guarantee that the institution will comply with such capital restoration plan. The bank holding company
must also provide appropriate assurances of performance. The aggregate liability of the parent holding company is limited to the lesser
of (i) an amount equal to 5.0% of the depository institution’s total assets at the time it became undercapitalized and (ii) the amount
which is necessary (or would have been necessary) to bring the institution into compliance with all capital standards applicable with
respect to such institution as of the time it fails to comply with the plan. If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, it
is treated as if it is “significantly undercapitalized.”
“Significantly undercapitalized” depository institutions may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions, including orders to
sell sufficient voting stock to become “adequately capitalized,” requirements to reduce total assets, and cessation of receipt of deposits
from correspondent banks. “Critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to the appointment of a receiver or conservator.
The appropriate federal banking agency may, under certain circumstances, reclassify a well-capitalized insured depository institution as
adequately capitalized. The FDIA provides that an institution may be reclassified if the appropriate federal banking agency determines
(after notice and opportunity for hearing) that the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition or deems the institution to be engaging
in an unsafe or unsound practice.
The appropriate agency is also permitted to require an adequately capitalized or undercapitalized institution to comply with the
supervisory provisions as if the institution were in the next lower category (but not treat a significantly undercapitalized institution as
critically undercapitalized) based on supervisory information other than the capital levels of the institution.
The Corporation believes that, as of December 31, 2022, the Bank was “well capitalized” based on the aforementioned ratios.
Temporary Regulatory Capital Relief Related to Impact of CECL. Concurrent with enactment of the CARES Act, in March 2020, the
OCC, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the FDIC published an interim final rule to delay the estimated impact
on regulatory capital stemming from the implementation of CECL. The interim final rule maintains the three-year transition option in
the previous rule and provides banks the option to delay for two years an estimate of CECL’s effect on regulatory capital, relative to the
12
incurred loss methodology’s effect on regulatory capital, followed by a three-year transition period (five-year transition option). The
Corporation did not adopt the capital transition relief.
Incentive Compensation. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the federal bank regulatory agencies and the SEC to establish joint regulations
or guidelines prohibiting incentive-based payment arrangements at specified regulated entities, such as the Corporation and the Bank,
having at least $1 billion in total assets that encourage inappropriate risks by providing an executive officer, employee, director or
principal shareholder with excessive compensation, fees, or benefits or that could lead to material financial loss to the entity. In addition,
these regulators must establish regulations or guidelines requiring enhanced disclosure to regulators of incentive-based compensation
arrangements. The agencies proposed such regulations in April 2011, but the regulations have not been finalized. If the regulations are
adopted in the form initially proposed, they will impose limitations on the manner in which the Corporation may structure compensation
for its executives.
The Federal Reserve Board, OCC and FDIC have issued a comprehensive final guidance on incentive compensation policies intended
to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of banking organizations do not undermine the safety and soundness of such
organizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The guidance, which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect
the risk profile of an organization, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon the key principles that a banking organization’s
incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the organization’s ability
to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) be supported
by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the organization’s board of directors. These three principles
are incorporated into the proposed joint compensation regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act, discussed above.
The Federal Reserve Board will review, as part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation
arrangements of banking organizations, such as the Corporation, that are not “large, complex banking organizations.” These reviews
will be tailored to each organization based on the scope and complexity of the organization’s activities and the prevalence of incentive
compensation arrangements. The findings of the supervisory initiatives will be included in reports of examination. Deficiencies will be
incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the organization’s ability to make acquisitions and take other
actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a banking organization if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-
management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking
prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies.
Ability-to-Repay Requirement and Qualified Mortgage Rule. The Dodd-Frank Act contains additional provisions that affect consumer
mortgage lending. First, it significantly expands underwriting requirements applicable to loans secured by 1-4 family residential real
property and augments federal law combating predatory lending practices. In addition to numerous new disclosure requirements, the
Dodd-Frank Act imposes new standards for mortgage loan originations on all lenders, including banks and savings associations, in an
effort to encourage lenders to verify a borrower’s ability to repay, while also establishing a presumption of compliance for certain
“qualified mortgages.” Most significantly, the new standards limit the total points and fees that the Bank and/or a broker may charge on
conforming and jumbo loans to 3% of the total loan amount.
The CFPB has issued a final rule that implements the Dodd-Frank Act’s ability-to-repay requirements, and clarifies the presumption of
compliance for “qualified mortgages.” Further, the final rule also clarifies that qualified mortgages do not include “no-doc” loans and
loans with negative amortization, interest-only payments, balloon payments, terms in excess of 30 years, or points and fees paid by the
borrower that exceed 3% of the loan amount, subject to certain exceptions. In addition, for qualified mortgages, the monthly payment
must be calculated on the highest payment that will occur in the first five years of the loan, and the borrower’s total debt-to-income ratio
generally may not be more than 43%. The final rule also provides that certain mortgages that satisfy the general product feature
requirements for qualified mortgages and that also satisfy the underwriting requirements of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (while they
operate under federal conservatorship or receivership) or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Department of
Veterans Affairs, or Department of Agriculture or Rural Housing Service are also considered to be qualified mortgages. This second
category of qualified mortgages will phase out as the aforementioned federal agencies issue their own rules regarding qualified
mortgages, the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ends, and, in any event, after seven years.
As set forth in the Dodd-Frank Act, subprime (or higher-priced) mortgage loans are subject to the ability-to-repay requirement, and the
final rule provides for a rebuttable presumption of lender compliance for those loans. The final rule also applies the ability-to-repay
requirement to prime loans, while also providing a conclusive presumption of compliance (i.e., a safe harbor) for prime loans that are
also qualified mortgages. Additionally, the final rule generally prohibits prepayment penalties (subject to certain exceptions) and sets
13
forth a 3-year record retention period with respect to documenting and demonstrating the ability-to-repay requirement and other
provisions.
USA Patriot Act. The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism
Act of 2001 (the “USA Patriot Act”) is intended to strengthen the ability of U.S. Law Enforcement to combat terrorism on a variety of
fronts. The potential impact of the USA Patriot Act on financial institutions is significant and wide-ranging. The USA Patriot Act
contains sweeping anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and requires financial institutions to implement additional
policies and procedures with respect to, or additional measures designed to address, any or all of the following matters, among others:
money laundering and currency crimes, customer identification verification, cooperation among financial institutions, suspicious
activities and currency transaction reporting.
S.A.F.E. Act Requirements. Regulations issued under the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008 ( the
“S.A.F.E. Act” ) require residential mortgage loan originators who are employees of institutions regulated by the foregoing agencies,
including national banks, to meet the registration requirements of the S.A.F.E. Act. The S.A.F.E. Act requires residential mortgage loan
originators who are employees of regulated financial institutions to be registered with the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and
Registry, a database created by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors and the American Association of Residential Mortgage
Regulators to support the licensing of mortgage loan originators by the states. Employees of regulated financial institutions are generally
prohibited from originating residential mortgage loans unless they are registered.
Other Regulations
Federal law extensively regulates other various aspects of the banking business such as reserve requirements. Current federal law also
requires banks, among other things to make deposited funds available within specified time periods. In addition, with certain exceptions,
a bank and a subsidiary may not extend credit, lease or sell property or furnish any services or fix or vary the consideration for the
foregoing on the condition that (i) the customer must obtain or provide some additional credit, property or services from, or to, any of
them, or (ii) the customer may not obtain some other credit, property or service from a competitor, except to the extent reasonable
conditions are imposed to assure the soundness of credit extended.
Interest and other charges collected or contracted by the Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates.
The loan operations are also subject to federal and state laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:
• Truth-In-Lending Act and state consumer protection laws governing disclosures of credit terms and prohibiting certain practices
with regard to consumer borrowers;
• Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public
officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community
it serves;
• Equal Credit Opportunity Act and other fair lending laws, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other
prohibited factors in extending credit;
• Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1978 and Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, governing the use and provision of
information to credit reporting agencies;
• Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies;
and rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.
The deposit operations also are subject to the:
• Customer Information Security Guidelines. The federal bank regulatory agencies have adopted final guidelines (the
“Guidelines”) for safeguarding confidential customer information. The Guidelines require each financial institution, under the
supervision and ongoing oversight of its Board of Directors, to create a comprehensive written information security program
designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer information, protect against any anticipated threats or hazards
14
to the security or integrity of such information; protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information that could
result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer; and implement response programs for security breaches.
• Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E. The Electronic Funds Transfer Act, which is implemented by Regulation E,
governs automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use
of automated teller machines and other electronic banking service.
• Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Fair and Accurate
Credit Transactions Act, and the implementing regulations govern consumer financial privacy, provide disclosure requirements
and restrict the sharing of certain consumer financial information with other parties.
The federal banking agencies have established guidelines which prescribe standards for depository institutions relating to internal
controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset
quality, earnings, compensation fees and benefits, and management compensation. The agencies may require an institution which fails
to meet the standards set forth in the guidelines to submit a compliance plan. Failure to submit an acceptable plan or adhere to an
accepted plan may be grounds for further enforcement action.
As noted above, the new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection has authority for amending existing consumer compliance regulations
and implementing new such regulations. In addition, the Bureau has the power to examine the compliance of financial institutions with
an excess of $10 billion in assets with these consumer protection rules. The Bank’s compliance with consumer protection rules will be
examined by the OCC and the FDIC, respectively, since the Bank does not meet this $10 billion asset level threshold.
Enforcement Powers. Federal regulatory agencies may assess civil and criminal penalties against depository institutions and certain
“institution-affiliated parties”, including management, employees, and agents of a financial institution, as well as independent
contractors and consultants such as attorneys and accountants and others who participate in the conduct of the financial institution’s
affairs.
In addition, regulators may commence enforcement actions against institutions and institution-affiliated parties. Possible enforcement
actions include the termination of deposit insurance. Furthermore, regulators may issue cease-and-desist orders to, among other things,
require affirmative action to correct any harm resulting from a violation or practice, including restitution, reimbursement,
indemnifications or guarantees against loss. A financial institution may also be ordered to restrict its growth, dispose of certain assets,
rescind agreements or contracts, or take other actions as determined by the regulator to be appropriate.
Effect of Governmental Monetary Policies. The Corporation’s earnings are affected by domestic economic conditions and the monetary
and fiscal policies of the United States government and its agencies. The Federal Reserve Bank’s monetary policies have had, and are
likely to continue to have, an important impact on the operating results of commercial banks through its power to implement national
monetary policy in order, among other things, to curb inflation or combat a recession. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve
have major effects upon the levels of bank loans, investments and deposits through its open market operations in United States
government securities and through its regulation of the discount rate on borrowings of member banks and the reserve requirements
against member bank deposits. It is not possible to predict the nature or impact of future changes in monetary and fiscal policies.
Available Information
The Corporation files annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, proxy statements and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Such reports, proxy statements and other information can be read and copied at the public
reference facilities maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission at the Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Securities
and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a web site (http://www.sec.gov)
that contains reports, proxy statements, and other information. The Corporation’s filings are also accessible at no cost on the
Corporation’s website at www.first-online.com.
15
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
An investment in the Corporation involves risk, some of which, including market, liquidity, credit, operational, legal, compliance,
reputational, and strategic risks, could be substantial and is inherent in our business. This risk also includes the possibility that the value
of the investment could decrease considerably, you could lose all or part of your investment, and dividends or other distributions
concerning the investment could be reduced or eliminated. Discussed below are the most significant risks and uncertainties that
management believes could adversely affect our financial results and condition, as well as the value of, and return on, an investment in
the Corporation. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below
together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report.
Economic conditions have affected and could adversely affect our revenue and profits.
Risks Related to Economic and Market Conditions
The Corporation’s financial performance generally, and in particular the ability of borrowers to pay interest on and repay principal of
outstanding loans and the value of collateral securing those loans, as well as demand for loans and other products and services that the
Corporation offers, is highly dependent upon the business environment in the markets where the Corporation operates and in the U.S.
as a whole. An economic downturn or sustained, high unemployment levels, inflation, supply chain disruptions that impact borrowers,
recession, currency devaluation, changes in the monetary supply, decreased investor or business confidence, trade wars and the
imposition of tariffs on goods purchased or sold by our customers, the effect of a pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of an infectious
disease on our customers, stock market volatility, and other factors beyond our control may have a negative effect on the ability of our
borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans (thereby, increasing the risk of loan defaults and losses), the value of collateral
securing those loans, demand for loans and other products and services we offer, and our deposit levels and composition.
Given the current economic environment, an economic recession or downturn is a greater risk than in previous years. An economic
recession or a downturn in various markets could have the following adverse effects on our business:
• A decrease in net interest income derived from our lending and deposit gathering activities;
• A decrease in the demand of our loans and other products we offer;
• A decrease in our deposit balances due to overall reductions in the number or value in client accounts;
• A decrease in the value of collateral securing our loans
• An increase in the level of nonperforming and classified loans;
• An increase in provisions for credit losses and loan charge-offs; and
• An increase in our operating expenses associated with attending to the effects of certain circumstances listed above.
As a result of these potential economic conditions, our operating results could be negatively impacted.
Continued elevated levels of inflation could adversely impact our business and results of operations.
The United States has recently experienced elevated levels of inflation, with the consumer price index reaching approximately 6.5% in
December 2022. In connection with elevated levels of inflation, the Federal Reserve Board raised the Effective Federal Funds Rate
seven times in 2022, ultimately targeting an Effective Federal Funds Rate between 4.25% and 4.50% in December, 2022. Interest rates
may continue to rise or otherwise stagnate at heightened levels in 2023 in an effort to account for continued levels of inflation.
Continued levels of inflation could have complex effects on our business and results of operations, some of which could be materially
adverse. While we generally expect any inflation-related increases in our interest expense to be offset by increases in our interest
revenue, inflation-driven increases in our levels of non-interest expense could negatively impact our results of operations.
Additionally, if interest rates continue to rise, we could see consumer sentiment shift and demand for loans may decrease which would
impact our results of operations. Continued elevated levels of inflation could also increase volatility and uncertainty in the business
environment, which could adversely affect loan demand and our clients’ ability to repay indebtedness. It is also possible that
governmental policy responses to the current inflation environment could further affect our business, such as changes to monetary and
fiscal policy. The duration and severity of the current inflationary period, and the governmental responses thereto, are unknown and
cannot be estimated with precision.
Changes in interest rates could adversely affect the Corporation’s results of operations and financial condition.
16
The Corporation’s earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon the Corporation’s net interest income. Net interest income is
the difference between interest income earned on interest earning assets, such as loans and securities, and interest expense paid on
interest bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowed funds. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond the
Corporation’s control, including general economic conditions, domestic and international events, changes in U.S. and other financial
markets, and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest
rates, could influence not only the interest that is received on loans and securities and the interest that is paid on deposits and
borrowings, but such changes could also affect the Corporation’s ability to originate loans and obtain deposits and the fair value of the
Corporation’s financial assets and liabilities.
If the interest rates paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on
loans and other interest-earning assets, our net interest income, and, therefore, our earnings, could be adversely affected. Such an
interest rate environment may also result in us incurring a higher cost to retain our deposits. While the higher payment amounts we
would receive on adjustable-rate or variable-rate loans in a rising interest rate environment may increase our interest income, some
borrowers may be unable to afford the higher payment amounts, and this could result in a higher rate of default. Rising interest rates
also may reduce the demand for loans and the value of fixed-rate investment securities. Accordingly, changes in interest rates could
adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Labor shortages and the loss of one or more of those key personnel may materially and adversely affect our business.
Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and retain key personnel. Key personnel that have regular direct contact
with customers and clients often build strong relationships that are important to our business. In addition, we rely on key personnel to
manage and operate our business, including major revenue producing functions, such as loan and deposit generation. Competition for
qualified personnel in the financial services industry can be intense and we may not be able to hire or retain the key personnel that we
depend upon for success. Frequently, we compete in the market for talent with entities that are not subject to comprehensive
regulation. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of our key personnel could have a material adverse impact on our business
because of their skills, knowledge of the markets in which we operate, years of industry experience, and the difficulty of promptly
finding qualified replacement personnel. Also, the loss of key personnel could jeopardize our relationships with customers and clients
and could lead to the loss of accounts. Losses of accounts managed by key personnel could have a material adverse impact on our
business.
Terrorist attacks, threats or actual war, natural disasters, global climate change, pandemics, other catastrophic events, trade
policies, civil unrest, protests, and other global and domestic conflicts may impact all aspects of our operations, revenues,
costs, and stock price in unpredictable ways.
Terrorist attacks in the U.S. and abroad, as well as future events occurring in response to or in connection with them, including,
without limitation, future terrorist attacks against U.S. targets, rumors or threats of war, actual conflicts involving the U.S. or its allies,
or military or trade disruptions, may impact our operations. In addition, natural disasters, global climate change, pandemics, other
catastrophic events, trade policies, domestic civil unrest, protest, and other global or domestic conflicts may impact our operations as
well. Any of these occurrences could have an adverse impact on our operating results, revenues, and costs and may result in the
volatility of the market price for our common stock and on the future price of our common stock.
Our participation in the SBA Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) exposes us to credit risk and regulatory enforcement
risk, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Corporation was a participating lender in the PPP, a loan program administered through the SBA, which was created to help
eligible businesses, organizations and self-employed persons fund their operational costs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Under this
program, the SBA guaranteed 100% of the amounts loaned under the PPP The Corporation made total loans under the PPP program in
the amount of $275.1 million, of which all has been forgiven by the SBA. The Corporation may be exposed to credit risk on a PPP
loan (even if such loan has been forgiven) if a determination is made by the SBA that there is a deficiency in the manner in which
these loans were originated, funded, or serviced. If a deficiency is identified, the SBA may deny its liability under the guaranty, reduce
the amount of the guaranty or, if it has already paid under the guaranty, seek recovery of any loss related to the deficiency from the
Corporation.
17
Geographic concentration of the Corporation’s markets makes our business highly susceptible to local economic conditions and
a downturn in local economic conditions may adversely affect our business.
Unlike larger banking organizations that are more geographically diversified, the Corporation’s operations are currently concentrated
in west central Indiana, east central Illinois, western Kentucky, and middle and western Tennessee, and most of our customers are
located in these markets. The economic conditions in these local markets may be different from, and in some instances be worse than,
the economic conditions in the U.S. as a whole. As a result of this geographic concentration, the Corporation’s financial results depend
largely upon economic conditions in these market areas. Deterioration in economic conditions in the Corporation’s markets could
result in one or more of the following, which may adversely affect our business:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
an increase in loan delinquencies;
an increase in problem assets and foreclosures;
an increase in our allowance for credit losses;
a decrease in the demand for our products and services;
a decrease in the value of collateral for loans, especially real estate, in turn reducing customers’ borrowing power,
the value of assets associated with problem loans and collateral coverage;
a decrease in net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors, which may impair their ability to honor guarantees made to
us; and
a decrease in deposits balances.
Changes to the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) may adversely impact the value of, and the return on, our
financial instruments that are indexed to LIBOR.
The Corporation is continuing to evaluate the impacts of the phase out of LIBOR. Management has determined to initially replace
LIBOR as an index for any new adjustable-rate loans with the Secured Overnight Finance Rate (“SOFR”). However, the transition
from LIBOR could create considerable costs and additional risk for us. Since SOFR is calculated differently, payments under contracts
indexed to new rates will differ from those indexed to LIBOR. The transition will change our market risk profiles, requiring changes
to risk and pricing models, valuation tools, product design, and hedging strategies. Further, our failure to adequately manage this
transition process with our customers could impact our reputation and may subject us to disputes or litigation with our customers over
the appropriateness or comparability to LIBOR of the substitute indices. Although we are currently unable to assess what the ultimate
impact of the transition from LIBOR will be, any market-wide transition away from LIBOR could have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Business
When we loan money, commit to loan money, or enter into a letter of credit or other contract with a counterparty, we incur
credit risk, or the risk of loss if our borrowers do not repay their loans or our counterparties fail to perform according to the
terms of their contracts.
As lending is one of our primary business activities, the credit quality of our portfolio can have a significant impact on our earnings.
We estimate and establish reserves for credit risks and probable incurred credit losses that are inherent in our loan portfolio. This
process, which is critical to our financial results and condition, requires difficult, subjective, and complex judgments, including
reviews of economic conditions and how these economic conditions might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans.
There is the chance that we will fail to identify the proper factors or that we will fail to accurately estimate the impacts of factors that
we identify. In addition, large loans, letters of credit, and contracts with individual counterparties in our portfolio magnify the credit
risk that we face, as the impact of large borrowers and counterparties not repaying their loans or performing according to the terms of
their contracts has a disproportionately significant impact on our credit losses and reserves.
18
The information that we use in managing our credit risk may be inaccurate or incomplete, which may result in an increased
risk of default and otherwise have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with clients and counterparties, we may rely on information
furnished by or on behalf of clients and counterparties, including financial statements and other financial information. We also may
rely on representations of clients and counterparties as to the accuracy and completeness of that information and, with respect to
financial statements, on reports of independent auditors. Default risk may arise from events or circumstances that are difficult to
detect, such as fraud. Moreover, such circumstances, including fraud, may become more likely to occur or be detected in periods of
general economic uncertainty. We may also fail to receive full information with respect to the risks of a counterparty. In addition, in
cases where we have extended credit against collateral, we may find that we are under-secured, for example, as a result of sudden
declines in market values that reduce the value of collateral or due to fraud with respect to such collateral. If these events or
circumstances were to occur, it could result in a potential loss of revenue and have an adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, and financial condition.
The Corporation operates in a highly competitive industry and market, and our business will suffer if we are unable to
compete effectively.
The Corporation faces substantial competition in all areas of its operations from a variety of different competitors, many of which are
larger and may have more financial resources. Our competitors include banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, finance
companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, factoring companies, financial technology companies, and other financial
intermediaries. The financial services industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory, and
technological changes and continued consolidation. Banks, securities firms, and insurance companies can merge under the umbrella of
a financial holding company, which can offer virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting,
insurance (both agency and underwriting), and merchant banking. Also, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible
for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment
systems. Many of the Corporation’s competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and may have lower cost structures. Additionally,
due to their size, many competitors may be able to achieve economies of scale and, as a result, may offer a broader range of products
and services as well as better pricing for those products and services than the Corporation can.
The Corporation’s ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including, among other things:
•
•
•
•
•
•
the ability to develop, maintain and build upon long-term customer relationships based on top quality service, and safe, sound
assets;
the ability to expand the Corporation's market position;
the scope, relevance and pricing of products and services offered to meet customer needs and demands;
the rate at which the Corporation introduces new products and services relative to its competitors;
customer satisfaction with the Corporation's level of service; and
industry and general economic trends.
Failure to perform in any of these areas could significantly weaken the Corporation's competitive position, which could adversely
affect the Corporation's growth and profitability, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's financial
condition and results of operations.
The Corporation has significant exposure to risks associated with commercial and commercial real estate loans.
As of December 31, 2022, approximately 58.8% of the Corporation’s loan portfolio consisted of commercial and commercial real
estate loans. These loans are generally viewed as having more inherent risk of default than residential mortgage or consumer loans.
The repayment of these loans often depends on the successful operation of a business and could be impacted by a recession or
economic downturn. These loans are more likely to be adversely affected by weak conditions in the economy. Also, the commercial
loan balance per borrower is typically larger than that of residential mortgage loans and consumer loans, indicating higher potential
losses on an individual loan basis. The deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in nonperforming
loans and a reduction in interest income. An increase in nonperforming loans could result in an increase in the provision for loan
19
losses and an increase in loan charge-offs, both of which could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
The Corporation’s accounting estimates and risk management processes rely on analytical and forecasting models, which, if
inadequate, may result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operation.
The processes the Corporation uses to estimate its allowance for credit losses and to measure the fair value of financial instruments, as
well as the processes used to estimate the effects of changing interest rates and other market measures on the Corporation’s financial
condition and results of operations, depend upon the use of analytical and forecasting models. These models reflect assumptions that
may not be accurate, particularly in times of market stress or other unforeseen circumstances. Even if these assumptions are adequate,
the models may prove to be inadequate or inaccurate because of other flaws in their design or their implementation. If the models the
Corporation uses for interest rate risk and asset-liability management are inadequate, the Corporation may incur increased or
unexpected losses upon changes in market interest rates or other market measures. If the models the Corporation uses for determining
its probable credit losses are inadequate, the allowance for credit losses may not be sufficient to support future charge-offs. If the
models the Corporation uses to measure the fair value of our financial instruments are inadequate, the fair value of our financial
instruments may fluctuate unexpectedly or may not accurately reflect what the Corporation could realize upon sale or settlement of
our financial instruments. Any failure in the Corporation’s analytical or forecasting models could have a material adverse effect on the
Corporation’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We are a community bank and our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to the success of our business.
The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries are community banks and their reputation is one of the most valuable components of our
business. A key component of our business strategy is to rely on our reputation for customer service and knowledge of local markets
to expand our presence by capturing new business opportunities from existing and prospective customers in our current market and
contiguous areas. As such, we strive to conduct our business in a manner that enhances our reputation. This is done, in part, by
recruiting, hiring, and retaining employees who share our core values of being an integral part of the communities we serve, delivering
superior service to our customers, and caring about our customers and associates. If our reputation is negatively affected by the actions
of our employees, by our inability to conduct our operations in a manner that is appealing to current or prospective customers, or
otherwise, our business and, therefore, our operating results, may be materially adversely affected.
Our operational systems and networks are subject to an increasing risk of continually evolving cybersecurity or other
technological risks, which could result in a loss of customer business, financial liability, regulatory penalties, damage to our
reputation, or the disclosure of confidential information.
Information technology systems are critical to our business. We use various technology systems to manage our customer relationships,
general ledger, securities, deposits, and loans. Additionally, as part of our business, we collect, process, and retain personal,
proprietary, and confidential information regarding our customers. The financial services industry has experienced an increase in both
the number and severity of reported cyber-attacks aimed at gaining unauthorized access to bank systems as a way to misappropriate
assets and sensitive information, corrupt and destroy data, or cause operational or business services disruptions. Any security breach
could result in the misappropriation, loss, or unauthorized disclosure of sensitive customer information, severely damage our
reputation, expose us to the risk of litigation and liability, disrupt our operations, and have a material adverse effect on our business.
We also rely on the integrity and security of a variety of third-party processors and payment, clearing, and settlement systems, as well
as the various participants involved in these systems, many of which have no direct relationship with us. Failure by these participants
or their systems to protect our customers’ transaction data may put us at risk for possible losses due to fraud or operational
disruption. In addition, a number of our third-party service providers are large national entities with dominant market presence in their
respective fields. Their services could prove difficult to replace in a timely manner if a failure or other service interruption were to
occur. Failures of certain vendors to provide contracted services could adversely affect our ability to deliver products and services to
our customers and cause us to incur significant expense.
Our customers are also the target of cyber-attacks and identity theft. Large scale identity theft could result in customers’ accounts
being compromised and fraudulent activities being performed in their name, which could negatively affect our reputation or result in
litigation and, consequently, negatively affect our results of operation.
20
The occurrence of cybersecurity incidents across a range of industries has resulted in increased legislative and regulatory scrutiny over
cybersecurity and calls for additional data privacy laws and regulations. These laws and regulations could result in increased operating
expenses or increase our exposure to the risk of litigation.
The occurrence of a cybersecurity incident involving us, third party service providers, or our customers, regardless of its origin, could
damage our reputation and result in a loss of customers and business and subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, and could expose
us to litigation and possible financial liability. Furthermore, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify
our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures arising from operational and security risks.
Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on external vendors, which could expose the Corporation to additional operational risks.
The Corporation relies on external vendors to provide products and services necessary to maintain day-to-day operations of the
Corporation. Accordingly, the Corporation’s operations are exposed to risk that these vendors will not perform in accordance with the
contracted arrangements under service level agreements. The failure of an external vendor to perform in accordance with the
contracted arrangements under service level agreements, because of changes in the vendor’s organizational structure, financial
condition, support for existing products and services, strategic focus, or for any other reason, could be disruptive to the Corporation’s
operations, which could have a material adverse impact on the Corporation’s business and, in turn, the Corporation’s financial
condition and results of operations.
New lines of business or new products and services may subject the Corporation to additional risks.
From time to time, the Corporation may implement new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of
business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not
fully developed. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or new products and services, the Corporation may invest
significant time and resources. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and/or new products or
services may not be achieved and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance with
regulations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of
business or a new product or service. Furthermore, any new line of business and/or new product or service could have a significant
impact on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the
development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have a material adverse effect on the
Corporation’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The financial services industry is characterized by rapid technological change, and if we fail to keep pace, our business may
suffer.
The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-
driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve
customers and to reduce costs. The Corporation’s future success depends, in part, upon its ability to address customer needs by using
technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in the
Corporation’s operations. The Corporation may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or
be successful in marketing these products and services to its customers. Further, many of our competitors have substantially greater
resources to invest in technological improvements. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial
services industry could negatively affect the Corporation’s growth, revenue, and profit.
A lack of liquidity could affect our operations and jeopardize our financial condition.
The Corporation requires liquidity to meet our deposit and other obligations as they come due. The Corporation’s access to funding
sources in amounts adequate to finance its activities or on terms that are acceptable to it could be impaired by factors that affect it
specifically or the financial services industry or the general economy. Factors that could reduce its access to liquidity sources include a
downturn in the markets in which our loans are concentrated or adverse regulatory actions against the Corporation. The Corporation’s
access to deposits may also be affected by the liquidity needs of depositors. The Corporation may not be able to replace maturing
deposits and advances as necessary in the future, especially if a large number of depositors sought to withdraw their deposits,
21
regardless of the reason. A failure to maintain adequate liquidity could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business,
financial condition, and result of operations.
The Corporation’s controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented, and the Corporation’s methods of reducing risk
exposure may not be effective.
The Corporation’s internal operations are subject to risks, including, but not limited to, data processing system failures and errors,
customer or employee fraud, and catastrophic failures resulting from terrorist acts or natural disasters. We regularly review and update
our internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls
and any system to reduce risk exposure, however well designed and operated, is based in part on assumptions and can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Additionally, instruments, systems, and strategies used
to hedge or otherwise manage exposure to various types of market compliance, credit, liquidity, operational, and business risks and
enterprise-wide risk could be less effective than anticipated. As a result, the Corporation may not be able to effectively mitigate its risk
exposures in particular market environments or against particular types of risk.
The Corporation may be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions.
Financial institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. The Corporation has exposure
to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services
industry, including commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks, and other institutional clients. Many of these
transactions expose the Corporation to credit risk in the event of a default by a counterparty or client. In addition, the Corporation’s
credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by the Corporation cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices not
sufficient to recover the full amount of the credit or derivative exposure due to the Corporation. These losses could have a material
adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Corporation may foreclose on collateral property and would be subject to the increased costs associated with ownership of
real property, resulting in reduced revenues and earnings.
The Corporation forecloses on collateral property from time to time to protect its interests and thereafter owns and operates foreclosed
property, in which case it is exposed to the risks inherent in the ownership of real estate. The amount that the Corporation, as a
mortgagee, may realize after a default is dependent upon factors outside of its control, including, but not limited to: (i) general or local
economic conditions; (ii) neighborhood values; (iii) interest rates; (iv) real estate tax rates; (v) operating expenses of the mortgaged
properties; (vi) environmental remediation liabilities; (vii) ability to obtain and maintain adequate occupancy of the properties; (viii)
zoning laws; (ix) governmental rules, regulations, and fiscal policies; and (x) natural disasters. Certain expenditures associated with
the ownership of real estate, principally real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs, may adversely affect the income from the
real estate. Therefore, the cost of operating real property may exceed the income earned from the real property, and the Corporation
may have to advance funds in order to protect its interests, or it may be required to dispose of the real property at a loss. These
expenditures and costs could adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to generate revenues, resulting in reduced levels of
profitability.
The Corporation’s earnings may be adversely impacted due to environmental liabilities associated with lending activities.
A significant portion of the Corporation’s loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, the
Corporation may foreclose on and take title to properties securing loans which have defaulted. In doing so, there is a risk that
hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous or toxic substances are found, the Corporation may be
liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require the Corporation to
incur substantial expenses and may materially reduce the affected property’s value or limit the Corporation’s ability to use or sell the
affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may
increase the Corporation’s exposure to environmental liability. Environmental reviews of real property before initiating foreclosure
actions may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities
associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
22
The Corporation may become subject to claims and litigation pertaining to intellectual property.
Banking and other financial services companies, such as the Corporation, rely on technology companies to provide information
technology products and services necessary to support the Corporation’s day-to-day operations. Technology companies frequently
enter into litigation based on allegations of patent infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. In addition, patent
holding companies seek to monetize patents they have purchased or otherwise obtained. Competitors of the Corporation’s vendors, or
other individuals or companies, may claim to hold intellectual property sold or licensed to the Corporation by its vendors. Intellectual
property claims may increase in the future as the financial services sector becomes more reliant on information technology vendors.
The plaintiffs in these actions frequently seek injunctions and substantial damages.
Regardless of the scope or validity of alleged patents or other intellectual property rights, or the merits of any claims by potential or
actual litigants, the Corporation may have to engage in protracted litigation, which may be expensive, time-consuming, disruptive to
the Corporation’s operations, and distracting to management. If the Corporation is found to infringe upon one or more patents or other
intellectual property rights, it may be required to pay substantial damages or royalties to a third-party. The Corporation may also
consider entering into licensing agreements for disputed intellectual property, however, these license agreements may also
significantly increase the Corporation’s operating expenses. If legal matters related to intellectual property claims were resolved
against the Corporation or settled, the Corporation could be required to make payments in amounts that could have a material adverse
effect on its business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Changes in consumer use of banks and changes in consumer spending and savings habits could adversely affect the
Corporation’s financial results.
Technology and other changes now allow many customers to complete financial transactions without using banks. For example,
consumers can pay bills and transfer funds directly without going through a bank. This process of eliminating banks as intermediaries
could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and income generated from those deposits. In addition,
changes in consumer spending and savings habits could adversely affect the Corporation’s operations, and the Corporation may be
unable to timely develop competitive new products and services in response to these changes.
Potential acquisitions may disrupt the Corporation’s business and dilute shareholder value.
The Corporation generally seeks merger or acquisition partners that are culturally similar and have experienced management and
possess either significant market presence or have potential for improved profitability through financial management, economies of
scale, or expanded services. Acquiring other banks, businesses, or branches involves various risks commonly associated with
acquisitions, including, among other things:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the time and costs associated with identifying and evaluating potential new markets, hiring experienced local management, and
opening new offices, and the time lags between these activities and the generation of sufficient assets and deposits to support
the costs of the expansion;
the time and costs associated with identifying potential acquisition and merger targets;
the accuracy of the estimates and judgments used to evaluate credit, operations, management, and market risks with respect to
a target company;
the diversion of our management’s attention to the negotiation of a transaction, and the integration of the operations and
personnel of the combined businesses;
our ability to finance an acquisition and possible dilution to our existing shareholders;
closing delays and expenses related to the resolution of lawsuits filed by shareholders of targets;
entry into new markets where we lack experience;
introduction of new products and services into our business;
potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of the target company;
exposure to potential asset quality issues of the target company;
the risk of loss of key employees and customers; and
incurrence and possible impairment of goodwill associated with an acquisition and possible adverse short-term effects on our
results of operations.
23
Acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over book and market values and, therefore, some dilution of the
Corporation’s tangible book value and net income per common share may occur in connection with any future transaction.
Furthermore, failure to realize the expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other
projected benefits from an acquisition could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
Future growth or operating results may require the Corporation to raise additional capital, but that capital may not be
available or it may be dilutive.
The Corporation is required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support its operations.
To the extent the Corporation’s future operating results erode capital or the Corporation elects to expand through loan growth or
acquisition it may be required to raise capital. The Corporation’s ability to raise capital will depend on conditions in the capital
markets, which are outside of its control, and on the Corporation’s financial performance. Accordingly, the Corporation may not be
able to raise capital when needed or on favorable terms. If the Corporation cannot raise additional capital when needed, it will be
subject to increased regulatory supervision and the imposition of restrictions on its growth and business. These restrictions could
negatively impact the Corporation’s ability to operate or further expand its operations through acquisitions or the establishment of
additional branches and may result in increases in operating expenses and reductions in revenues that could have a material adverse
effect on its financial condition and results of operations.
The value of the Corporation’s goodwill and other intangible assets may decline in the future.
As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation had $93.7 million of goodwill and other intangible assets. A significant decline in the
Corporation’s expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in the business climate, slower growth rates, or a significant
and sustained decline in the price of the Corporation’s common stock may necessitate taking charges in the future related to the
impairment of the Corporation’s goodwill and other intangible assets. If the Corporation were to conclude that a future write-down of
goodwill and other intangible assets is necessary, the Corporation would record the appropriate charge, which could have a material
adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Corporation relies on dividends from its subsidiaries for most of its revenue.
The Corporation is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries. It receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends
from its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on the Corporation’s common stock and
interest and principal on the Corporation’s debt. Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that the
Bank may pay to the Corporation. Also, the Corporation’s right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiary’s liquidation
or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors. In the event the Bank is unable to pay dividends to the
Corporation, the Corporation may not be able to service debt, pay obligations, or pay dividends on the Corporation’s common stock.
The inability to receive dividends from the Bank could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
Risks Related to the Legal and Regulatory Environment
We operate in a highly regulated environment and the regulatory framework to which we are subject may adversely affect our
results of operations.
The Corporation, and the Bank operate in a highly regulated environment and we are subject to extensive regulation, supervision, and
examination by the Federal Reserve, the OCC, and the FDIC and DFI, respectively. Banking regulations are primarily intended to
protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds, and the banking system as a whole, not our shareholders. Further, as a bank
holding company, we are required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to the Bank and to commit resources to
support our subsidiary banks if needed. This regulatory framework affects our lending practices, capital structure, investment
practices, and growth, among other things.
If, as a result of an examination, a banking regulatory were to determine that our financial condition, capital resources, asset quality,
earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of any of our operations had become unsatisfactory, or that we were in
violation of any law or regulation, they may take a number of different remedial actions as they deem appropriate. These actions
24
include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any
violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital, to restrict our
growth, to assess civil money penalties, to fine or remove officers and directors, and, if it is concluded that these conditions cannot be
corrected or there is an imminent risk of loss to depositors, to terminate our deposit insurance and place us into receivership or
conservatorship. Any regulatory action against us or failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could have an adverse
effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Legislative and regulatory actions taken now or in the future may increase our costs and impact our business, regulatory
structure, financial condition, and/or results of operations.
Since the 2007-2008 financial crisis, federal and state banking laws and regulations, as well as interpretations and implementations of
these laws and regulations, have undergone substantial review and change. In particular, the Dodd-Frank Act drastically revised the
laws and regulations under which we operate. Financial institutions generally have also been subjected to increased scrutiny from
regulatory authorities. These changes and increased scrutiny may result in increased costs of doing business, decreased revenues and
net income, may reduce our ability to effectively compete to attract and retain customers, or make it less attractive for us to continue
providing certain products and services. Any future changes in federal and state law and regulations, as well as the interpretations and
implementations of federal and state laws and regulations, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways, including those listed
above, impact the regulatory structure under which we operate, significantly increase our costs, impede the efficiency of our internal
business processes, require us to increase our regulatory capital and modify our business strategy, limit our ability to pursue business
opportunities in an efficient manner, or other ways that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or
results of operations. These changes also may require us to invest significant management attention and resources to make any
necessary changes to operations to comply and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
The Basel III capital rules may require us to retain higher capital levels, impacting our ability to pay dividends, repurchase
our stock, or pay discretionary bonuses.
The Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and the OCC adopted final rules for the Basel III capital framework which became effective on
January 1, 2015. These rules substantially amended the regulatory risk-based capital rules formerly applicable to the Corporation and
its banking subsidiaries. The rules have been phased in over time beginning in 2015 and became fully phased-in in 2019. The rules
provide for minimum capital ratios of (i) common equity Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio of 4.5%, (ii) Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
of 6%, and (iii) total risk-based capital ratio of 8%. As fully phased in, the rules also require a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% on
top of the foregoing minimum capital ratios, resulting in an effective requirement for minimum capital ratios of (a) common equity
Tier 1 risk-weighted capital ratio of 7%, (b) Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.5%, and (c) total risk-based capital ratio of 10.5%.
Failure to satisfy any of these three capital requirements will result in limits on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and
paying discretionary bonuses. These limitations establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilized for
these actions.
We face a risk of noncompliance and enforcement action with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering statutes
and regulations.
The Bank Secrecy Act, the USA Patriot Act, and other laws and regulations require financial institutions, among other duties, to
institute and maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and file suspicious activity and currency transaction reports as
appropriate. The Federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for
violations of those requirements and has engaged in coordinated enforcement efforts with the other federal agencies, including federal
banking regulators. We are also subject to increased scrutiny of compliance with the rules enforced by the U.S. Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. If our policies, procedures and systems are deemed deficient, we could be subject to
liability, including fines and regulatory actions, which may include restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and the necessity to
obtain regulatory approvals to proceed with certain aspects of our business plan, including any acquisitions we desire to make. We
could also incur increased costs and expenses to improve our anti-money laundering procedures and systems to comply with any
regulatory requirements or actions. Failure to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist
financing could also have serious reputational consequences for us. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.
25
Higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments could adversely affect our financial condition.
FDIC insurance premiums we pay may change and be significantly higher in the future. Market developments may significantly
deplete the insurance fund of the FDIC and further reduce the ratio of reserves to insured deposits, thereby making it requisite upon
the FDIC to charge higher premiums prospectively.
We have risk related to legal proceedings.
We are involved in judicial, regulatory, and arbitration proceedings concerning matters arising from our business activities and
fiduciary responsibilities. We establish reserves for legal claims when payments associated with the claims become probable and the
costs can be reasonably estimated. We may still incur legal costs for a matter even if we have not established a reserve. In addition, the
actual cost of resolving a legal claim may be substantially higher than any amounts reserved for that matter. The ultimate resolution of
a pending or future legal proceeding, depending on the remedy sought and granted, could materially adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
The Corporation may not be able to pay dividends in the future in accordance with past practice.
Risks Related to the Corporation’s Common Stock
The Corporation has historically paid a semi-annual dividend to common shareholders. The payment of dividends is subject to legal
and regulatory restrictions. Any payment of dividends in the future will depend, in large part, on the Corporation’s earnings, capital
requirements, financial condition and other factors considered relevant by the Corporation’s Board of Directors.
The price of the Corporation’s common stock may be volatile, which may result in losses for investors.
General market price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price of the Corporation’s common stock
and may make it more difficult for shareholders to resell their common stock when they want and at prices they find attractive. The
Corporation’s common stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
announcements and news reports relating to the Corporation’s business and trends, concerns, and other issues in the financial
services industry generally;
fluctuations in the Corporation’s results of operations;
sales or purchases of substantial amounts of the Corporation’s securities in the marketplace;
a shortfall or excess in revenues or earnings compared to securities analysts’ expectations;
changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections;
actual or expected economic conditions that are perceived to affect the Corporation, such as changes in real estate values or
interest rates;
perceptions in the marketplace regarding the Corporation and/or our competitors;
new technology used, or services offered, by competitors;
changes in applicable government regulation;
•
•
•
• macroeconomic and geopolitical factors discussed in this Risk Factors section; and
•
the Corporation’s announcement of new acquisitions or other projects.
As such, the market price of the Corporation’s common stock may not accurately reflect the underlying value of the stock, and
investors should consider this before relying on the market prices of the Corporation’s common stock when making an investment
decision.
Future capital needs could result in dilution of shareholder investment.
Our board of directors may determine from time to time there is a need to or, if our or the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios fall below
the required minimums, we could be forced to raise additional capital through the issuance of additional shares of stock or other
securities, including debt securities and senior or subordinated notes. We are currently authorized to issue up to 40 million shares of
common stock, of which 12,051,964 shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2022, and up to 10 million shares of preferred stock,
of which no shares are outstanding. Subject to certain limitations, our board of directors generally has authority, without action or vote
of our shareholders, to issue all or part of the remaining authorized but unissued shares and to establish the rights, preferences, and
26
privileges of any class or series of preferred stock. These equity and/or debt issuances could dilute the ownership interest of our
shareholders and may dilute the per share book value of our common stock. New investors also may have rights, preferences, and
privileges senior to our shareholders which may adversely impact our shareholders.
Anti-takeover laws and charter provisions may adversely affect the value of our common stock.
Provisions of state and federal law and our articles of incorporation may make it more difficult for someone to acquire control of the
Corporation. Under federal law, subject to certain exemptions, a person, entity, or group must notify the federal banking agencies
before acquiring 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock of a bank holding company, including the Corporation’s common stock.
There also are Indiana statutory provisions and provisions in our articles of incorporation that may be used to delay or block a
takeover attempt. As a result, these statutory provisions and provisions in our articles of incorporation could result in the Corporation
being less attractive to a potential acquiror.
An investment in the Corporation’s common stock is not an insured deposit.
The Corporation’s common stock is not a bank deposit and, therefore, is not insured against loss by the FDIC, any other deposit
insurance fund or by any other public or private entity. Investment in the Corporation’s common stock is inherently risky for the
reasons described in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this report and is subject to the same market forces that affect the
price of common stock in any company. As a result, if you acquire the Corporation’s common stock, you could lose some or all of
your investment.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
The Corporation is located in a four-story office building in downtown Terre Haute, Indiana that was first occupied in June 1988. It is
leased to the Bank. The Bank also owns one other facility in Terre Haute, which is a 50,000-square-foot building housing operations
and administrative staff and equipment. In addition, the Bank holds in fee seven other branch buildings. One of the branch buildings is
a single-story 36,000-square-foot building which is located in a Terre Haute suburban area. Two other branch bank buildings are leased
by the Bank. The expiration dates on the leases are May 30, 2023 and May 31, 2025.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking centers in Clay County include two offices in Brazil, Indiana and an office in Clay City, Indiana.
All three buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Daviess County include an office in Washington, Indiana. This building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Greene County include an office in Worthington, Indiana. This building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Knox County include one office in Vincennes, Indiana. This building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking centers in Parke County include one office in Rockville, Indiana and one office in Marshall,
Indiana. Both buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Putnam County include an office in Greencastle, Indiana. This building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking centers in Sullivan County include offices in Sullivan, Dugger, and Farmersburg, Indiana. All
three buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Vanderburgh County include an office in Evansville, Indiana. This building is held in
fee.
27
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking centers in Vermillion County include two offices in Clinton, Indiana and an office in Cayuga,
Indiana. All three buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Champaign County include two offices in Champaign, Illinois, an office in Mahomet,
Illinois, and an office in Urbana, Illinois. One of the banking centers in Champaign is held in fee while the land is leased. The land lease
expires September 6, 2036. One of the banking centers in Champaign is leased and the lease expires on December 31, 2027. The banking
center in Mahomet is leased and the lease expires on June 4, 2024. The banking center in Urbana is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Clark County include an office in Marshall, Illinois. This building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking centers in Coles County include an office in Charleston, Illinois and an office in Mattoon, Illinois.
These buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking centers in Crawford County include its main office and a drive-up facility in Robinson, Illinois.
Both buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Franklin County include an office in Benton, Illinois. This building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Jasper County include an office in Newton, Illinois. This building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking centers in Jefferson County include an office and a drive-up facility in Mt. Vernon, Illinois. Both
buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Lawrence County include an office in Lawrenceville, Illinois. This building is held in
fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking centers in Livingston include two offices in Pontiac, Illinois. Both buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking centers in Marion County include an office and a drive-up facility in Salem, Illinois. Both
buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in McLean County include two offices in Bloomington, Illinois. A banking center in
Bloomington is leased and the lease expires on June 30, 2026. The other building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Richland County includes an office in Olney, Illinois. This building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Vermilion County include four offices in Danville, Illinois, an office in Westville,
Illinois, and an office in Ridge Farm, Illinois. One of the buildings in Danville is leased and the lease expires on December 31, 2023
and the other five buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Wayne County includes an office in Fairfield, Illinois. This building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Breckinridge County includes an office in Cloverport, Kentucky. The building is held
in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Calloway County include two offices in Murray, Kentucky. The buildings are held in
fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Christian County include three offices in Hopkinsville, Kentucky. The buildings are
held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Fulton County include two offices in Fulton, Kentucky. The buildings are held in fee.
28
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Hancock County include an office in Hawesville, Kentucky, and an office in Lewisport,
Kentucky. The buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Hopkins County include two offices in Madisonville, Kentucky. The buildings are held
in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Marshall County include an office in Benton, Kentucky, and an office in Calvert City,
Kentucky. The buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Todd County include an office in Elkton, Kentucky. The building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Trigg County include an office in Cadiz, Kentucky. The building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Warren County include two offices in Bowling Green, Kentucky. A banking center in
Bowling Green is leased and the lease expires on September 30, 2023. The other building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Cheatham County include an office in Ashland City, Tennessee, an office in Kingston
Springs, Tennessee, and an office in Pleasant View, Tennessee. The buildings are held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Houston County include an office in Erin, Tennessee. The building is held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s banking center in Montgomery County include three offices in Clarksville, Tennessee. The buildings are
held in fee.
Facilities of the Corporation’s loan production offices, include an office in Bloomington, Indiana, an office in Carmel, Indiana, an office
in Evansville, Indiana, an office in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, and an office in Brentwood, Tennessee. The loan production offices are
leased by the Bank. The expiration dates on the leases are January 31, 2024, April 30, 2028, August 15, 2025, February 28, 2026, and
September 30, 2026.
Facilities of the Corporation’s subsidiary, FFB Risk Management Co., Inc., include an office facility in Las Vegas, Nevada. This office
facility is leased.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
(a) There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Corporation or its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their
property is the subject, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business.
(b) Not applicable.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
29
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
MARKET AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
(a) As of March 1, 2023 shareholders owned 12,065,888 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. The stock is traded on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market under the symbol “THFF”. On March 1, 2023, approximately 7,115 shareholders of record held our common
stock.
Historically, the Corporation has paid cash dividends semi-annually and currently expects that comparable cash dividends will continue
to be paid in the future. The following table gives quarterly high and low trade prices and dividends per share during each quarter for
2022 and 2021.
Quarter ended
2022
2021
Trade Price
High
Low
Cash
Dividends
Declared
Trade Price
High
Low
Cash
Dividends
Declared
March 31 $
June 30 $
September 30 $
December 31 $
46.75 $
45.16 $
48.76 $
49.26 $
43.09
41.42 $
42.94
44.82 $
$
0.54 $
$
0.74 $
46.31 $
45.62 $
42.21 $
45.29 $
38.30
40.73 $
38.33
41.96 $
0.53
0.63
30
The graph below represents the five-year total return of the Corporation’s stock. The five year total return for our stock during this time
was 15.20%. During this same period, the return on The Russell 2000 Index was 22.41% and the SNL Index of Banks $1 - $5 Billion
had a return of 14.88%.
Index
First Financial Corporation
Russell 2000
SNL Bank $1B-$5B
(b) Not applicable.
12/31/2017
12/31/2018
12/31/2019
12/31/2020
12/31/2021
Period Ending
100.00
100.00
100.00
90.59
88.99
81.23
105.80
111.70
103.68
92.32
134.00
96.33
110.29
153.85
134.76
12/31/2022
115.20
122.41
114.88
(c) The Corporation periodically acquires shares of its common stock directly from shareholders in individually negotiated transactions.
On February 3, 2016 First Financial Corporation issued a press release announcing that its Board of Directors has authorized a stock
repurchase program pursuant to which up to 5% of the Corporation’s outstanding shares of common stock, or 637,500 shares may be
repurchased. On October 29, 2020 First Financial Corporation issued a press release announcing that its Board of Directors has
authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which up to 5% of the Corporation’s outstanding shares of common stock, or 685,726
shares may be repurchased. On July 21, 2021 First Financial Corporation issued a press release announcing that its Board of Directors
has authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which up to 5% of the Corporation’s outstanding shares of common stock, or
652,411 shares may be repurchased. On April 21, 2022 First Financial Corporation issued a press release announcing that its Board of
Directors has authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which up to 10% of the Corporation’s outstanding shares of common
stock, or 1,243,531 shares may be repurchased. There were 626,574 and 981,132 purchases of common stock by the Corporation during
the years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021. The Corporation contributed 29,966 shares of treasury stock to the ESOP
31
in November of 2022. There were no shares of common stock purchased by the Corporation during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year
covered by this report.
Following is certain information regarding shares of common stock purchased by the Corporation during the quarter ended December 31,
2022.
October 1-31, 2022
November 1-30, 2022
December 1-31, 2022
Total
(b)
(a)
(c)
Total Number Of Shares
Purchased As Part Of
Total Number Of Average Price Publicly Announced Plans Number of Shares That May Yet
Shares Purchased Paid Per Share
Or Programs *
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
830,220
—
—
—
—
(c)
Maximum
Be Purchased *
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
FIVE YEAR COMPARISON OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
BALANCE SHEET DATA
Total assets
Securities
Loans
Deposits
Borrowings
Shareholders’ equity
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
Interest income
Interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for credit losses
Other income
Other expenses
Net income
PER SHARE DATA:
Net Income
Cash dividends
PERFORMANCE RATIOS:
Return on average assets
Return on average shareholders’ equity
Average total capital to average assets
Average shareholders’ equity to average assets
Dividend payout
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
$ 4,989,281
1,330,481
3,067,438
4,368,871
80,464
475,293
$ 5,175,099
1,359,514
2,815,895
4,409,569
109,311
582,576
$ 4,560,520
1,020,744
2,610,294
3,755,945
121,920
596,992
$ 4,023,250
926,717
2,656,390
3,275,357
111,092
557,608
$ 3,008,718
784,916
1,953,988
2,436,727
69,656
442,701
183,301
18,259
165,042
(2,025)
46,716
126,023
71,109
152,198
8,797
143,401
2,466
42,084
117,406
52,987
160,485
14,139
146,346
10,528
42,476
112,758
53,844
149,121
17,469
131,652
4,700
38,452
104,405
48,872
126,224
9,645
116,579
5,768
38,206
91,289
46,583
5.82
1.17
4.02
1.06
3.93
1.04
3.80
1.03
1.41 %
14.37
10.64
9.81
21.68
1.10 %
8.87
13.36
12.41
28.22
1.25 %
9.07
14.31
13.77
26.58
1.42 %
9.83
15.05
14.46
27.69
3.80
1.02
1.57 %
10.98
14.93
14.25
26.85
32
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATION
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as disclosures found elsewhere
in this report are based upon First Financial Corporation’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires
the Corporation to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Material
estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for credit
losses, securities valuation and goodwill. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses (ACL) represents management's estimate of expected losses inherent within
the existing loan portfolio. The allowance for credit losses is increased by the provision for credit losses charged to expense and reduced
by loans charged off, net of recoveries. The allowance for credit losses is determined based on management's assessment of several
factors: reviews and evaluations of specific loans, changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions,
nonperforming loans, determination of acquired loans as purchase credit deteriorated, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Loans
are individually evaluated when they do not share risk characteristics with other loans in the respective pool. Loans evaluated
individually are excluded from the collective evaluation. Management elected the collateral dependent practical expedient upon adoption
of ASC 326. Expected credit losses on individually evaluated loans are based on the fair value of the collateral at the reporting date,
adjusted for selling costs as appropriate.
Management utilizes a cohort methodology to determine the allowance for credit losses. This method identifies and captures the balance
of a pool of loans with similar risk characteristics, as of a particular point in time to form a cohort, then tracks the respective losses
generated by that cohort of loans over their remaining life. The cohorts track loan balances and historical loss experience since 2008,
and management extends the look back period each quarter to capture all available data points in the historical loss rate calculation. The
quantitative component of the ACL involves assumptions that require a significant level of estimation; these include historical losses as
a predictor of future performance, appropriateness of selected delay periods, and the reasonableness of the portfolio segmentation.
A historical data set is expected to provide the best indication of future credit performance. Delay periods represent the amount of time
it takes a cohort of loans to become seasoned, or incur sufficient attrition through pay downs, renewals, or charge-offs. Portfolio
segmentation relates to the pooling of loans with similar risk characteristics, such as industry types, collateral, and consumer purpose.
On an annual basis, in the first quarter, management performs a recalibration of the delay periods and portfolio segmentation to determine
whether they are reasonable and appropriate based on the information available at that time.
Management considers qualitative adjustments to expected credit loss estimates for information not already captured in the loss
estimation process. Where past performance may not be representative of future losses, loss rates are adjusted for qualitative and
economic forecast factors. Management uses the peak three consecutive quarter net charge off rate to capture maximum potential
volatility over the reasonable and supportable forecast period. Historical losses utilized in setting the qualitative factor ranges are
anchored to 2008 and may be supplemented by peer information when needed. The qualitative factor ranges are recalibrated annually
to capture recent behavior that is indicative of the credit profile of the current portfolio.
Qualitative factors include items, such as changes in lending policies or procedures, asset specific risks, and economic uncertainty in
forward-looking forecasts. Economic indicators utilized in forecasting include unemployment rate, gross domestic product, housing
starts, and interest rates. Management uses a two-year reasonable and supportable period across all loan segments to forecast economic
conditions. Management believes the two-year time horizon aligns with available industry guidance and various forecasting sources.
Economic forecast adjustments are overlaid onto historical loss rates. As such, reversion from forecast rates to historical loss rates is
immediate.
The ACL and allowance for unfunded commitments were $39.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively at December 31, 2022, compared
to $48.3 million and $3.0 million, respectively at December 31, 2021. The $8.5 million decrease in the ACL was the result of several
factors. The first was the annual model recalibration. Each year, in the first quarter, management reviews each model variable to
determine if adjustments are necessary to improve the model’s predictability. In the first quarter 2022 the delay periods were shortened
to pick up more recent losses. Also, the qualitative factor maximum scorecard ranges for certain cohorts were reduced, which reduced
33
the reserve. Additionally, the qualitative factors for uncertainty were lowered due to the seasoning of the acquired loans, and as well as
lower qualitative factors, due to the sale of non farm non residential commercial loans in the third quarter. Finally, the reserve was
impacted by improved portfolio performance. The qualitative amount of the reserve decreased $3.3 million to $11.0 million. The
quantitative amount is $28.6 million at December 31, 2022, compared to $33.6 million at December 31, 2021. There was a $900 thousand
decrease in the allowance for unfunded commitments. See additional discussion of ACL in the Allowance for Credit Losses section
below.
Based on management’s analysis of the current portfolio, management believes the allowance is adequate. Changes in the financial
condition of individual borrowers, economic conditions, historical loss experience, or the condition of the various markets in which
collateral may be sold may affect the required level of the allowance for credit losses and the associated provision for credit losses. As
management monitors these changes, as well as those factors discussed above, adjustments may be recorded to the allowance for credit
losses and the associated provision for credit losses in the future.
Securities valuation and potential impairment. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains
and losses reported separately in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. The Corporation obtains market values
from a third party on a monthly basis in order to adjust the securities to fair value. Equity securities that do not have readily determinable
fair values are carried at cost. Additionally, all securities are required to be evaluated for impairment related to credit losses. In evaluating
for impairment, management considers the reason for the decline, the extent of the decline, and whether the Corporation intends to sell
a security or is more likely than not to be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost. If an entity intends to sell or
it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, the security’s amortized cost
is written down to fair value through income. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the
entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period loss, a credit loss exists and
an allowance for credit losses is recorded, limited to the amount that the fair value of the security is less than its amortized cost basis.
Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of
applicable taxes. No allowance for credit losses for available-for-sale securities was needed at December 31, 2022.
Goodwill. The carrying value of goodwill requires management to use estimates and assumptions about the fair value of the reporting
unit compared to its book value. An impairment analysis is prepared on an annual basis. Fair values of the reporting units are determined
by an analysis which considers cash flows streams, profitability and estimated market values of the reporting unit. The majority of the
Corporation’s goodwill is recorded at First Financial Bank, N. A.
Management believes the accounting estimates related to the allowance for credit losses, valuation of investment securities and the
valuation of goodwill are “critical accounting estimates” because: (1) the estimates are highly susceptible to change from period to
period because they require management to make assumptions concerning, among other factors, the changes in the types and volumes
of the portfolios, valuation assumptions, and economic conditions, and (2) the impact of recognizing an impairment or credit loss could
have a material effect on the Corporation’s assets reported on the balance sheet as well as net income.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - SUMMARY FOR 2022
COMPARISON OF 2022 TO 2021
Net income for 2022 was $71.1 million, or $5.82 per share versus $53.0 million, or $4.02 per share for 2021. The increase in 2022 net
income is primarily due to increased interest rates and growth in earning assets. Return on average assets at December 31, 2022 increased
28.18% to 1.41% compared to 1.10% at December 31, 2021.
The primary components of income and expense affecting net income are discussed in the following analysis.
NET INTEREST INCOME
The principal source of the Corporation’s earnings is net interest income, which represents the difference between interest earned on
loans and investments and the interest cost associated with deposits and other sources of funding. Net interest income increased in 2022
to $165.0 million compared to $143.4 million in 2021. Total average interest earning assets increased to $4.80 billion in 2022 from
$4.61 billion in 2021. The tax-equivalent yield on these assets increased to 3.92% in 2022 from 3.39% in 2021. Total average interest-
34
bearing liabilities increased to $3.61 billion in 2022 from $3.43 billion in 2021. The average cost of these interest-bearing liabilities
increased to 0.51% in 2022 from 0.26% in 2021.
The net interest margin increased from 3.20% in 2021 to 3.54% in 2022. Earning asset yields increased 53 basis points while the rate
on interest-bearing liabilities increased by 25 basis points.
35
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET - AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES
2022
December 31,
2021
2020
Average
Yield/
Average
Yield/
Average
Yield/
Balance
Interest
Rate
Balance
Interest
Rate
Balance
Interest
Rate
(Dollar amounts in
thousands)
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (1) (2)
Taxable investment
securities
Tax-exempt
investments (2)
Cash and due from
banks
Federal funds sold
Total interest-earning
assets
Non-interest earning
assets:
Cash and due from
banks
Premises and
equipment, net
Other assets
Less allowance for
loan losses
TOTALS
LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
Transaction accounts
Time deposits
Short-term borrowings
Other borrowings
Total interest-bearing
liabilities:
Non interest-bearing
liabilities:
Demand deposits
Other
Shareholders' equity
TOTALS
Net interest earnings
Net yield on interest-
earning assets
$ 2,884,053 147,398 5.11 % $ 2,602,344 128,978 4.96 % $ 2,702,225
138,302 5.12 %
981,453
21,014 2.14 %
890,563
13,110 1.47 %
689,203
13,625 1.98 %
451,228
14,216 3.15 %
387,935
13,544 3.49 %
322,121
12,731 3.95 %
479,854
3,893
5,224 1.09 %
106 2.72 %
726,412
4,487
888 0.12 %
42 0.94 %
—
1,245
— %
—
71 5.70 %
4,800,481 187,958 3.92 % 4,611,741 156,562 3.39 % 3,714,794
164,729 4.43 %
—
68,911
216,592
(41,997)
$ 5,043,987
—
64,787
183,589
(45,767)
$ 4,814,350
370,883
63,145
187,415
(23,318)
$ 4,312,919
$ 3,034,430
483,038
83,959
13,175
3,614,602
891,042
43,506
4,549,150
494,837
$ 5,043,987
13,483
3,260
1,243
273
0.44 % $ 2,799,227
520,885
0.67 %
99,805
1.48 %
7,562
2.07 %
2,751 0.10 % $ 2,282,750
589,975
5,407 1.04 %
90,613
387 0.39 %
18,335
252 3.33 %
4,424 0.19 %
8,377 1.42 %
568 0.63 %
770 4.20 %
18,259
0.51 % 3,427,479
8,797 0.26 % 2,981,673
14,139 0.47 %
717,764
71,738
4,216,981
597,369
$ 4,814,350
660,011
77,444
3,719,128
593,791
$ 4,312,919
$ 169,699
$ 147,765
$ 150,590
3.54 %
3.20 %
4.05 %
(1)For purposes of these computations, non-accruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding.
(2)Interest income includes the effect of tax equivalent adjustments using a federal tax rate of 21%.
36
The following table sets forth the components of net interest income due to changes in volume and rate. The table information compares
2022 to 2021 and 2021 to 2020.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Interest earned on interest-
earning assets:
Loans (1) (2)
Taxable investment
securities
Tax-exempt investment
securities (2)
Cash and due from banks
Federal funds sold
Total interest income
Interest paid on interest-
bearing liabilities:
Transaction accounts
Time deposits
Short-term borrowings
Other borrowings
Total interest expense
Net interest income
2022 Compared to 2021 Increase
(Decrease) Due to
2021 Compared to 2020 Increase
(Decrease) Due to
Volume
Rate
Volume/
Rate
Total
Volume
Rate
Volume/
Rate
Total
$ 13,962 $
4,023 $
436 $ 18,421 $ (5,112) $ (4,374) $
162 $ (9,324)
1,338
5,958
608
7,904
3,981
(3,479)
(1,017)
(515)
2,210
(301)
(6)
(1,322)
7,020
80
(216)
(2,383)
(11)
672
4,336
63
2,600
—
185
(1,484)
—
(59)
$ 17,203 $ 15,759 $ (1,566) $ 31,396 $
1,654 $ (9,396) $
(303)
813
888
888
(29)
(155)
(425) $ (8,167)
231
(393)
(61)
187
(36)
$ 17,239 $
814
9,687
137
(1,892)
(173)
1,091
(71)
(95)
707
8,791
6,968 $ (2,273) $ 21,934 $
10,732
(2,148)
857
21
9,462
1,001
(981)
58
(452)
(374)
2,028 $ (4,586) $
(2,181)
(2,253)
(217)
(159)
(4,810)
(1,673)
(493)
(2,970)
264
(181)
(22)
(518)
93
(5,342)
(158)
(267) $ (2,825)
(1)For purposes of these computations, non-accruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding.
(2)Interest income includes the effect of tax equivalent adjustments using a federal tax rate of 21%.
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The provision for credit losses charged to expense is based upon current expected loss and the results of a detailed analysis estimating
an appropriate and adequate allowance for credit losses. The analysis is governed by Accounting Standards Codification (ASC 326),
implemented in 2020, which uses an economic forecast that includes the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. For the year ended
December 31, 2022, the negative provision for credit losses was $2.0 million, a decrease of $4.5 million, or 182%, compared to 2021.
The negative provision for the year was the result of several factors. The first was the annual model recalibration. Each year, in the first
quarter, management reviews each model variable to determine if adjustments are necessary to improve the model’s predictability. In
the first quarter 2022 the delay periods were shortened to pick up more recent losses. Also, the qualitative factor maximum scorecard
ranges for certain cohorts were reduced, which reduced the reserve. Secondly, management removed two qualitative factors that were
deemed no longer applicable. The first was related to acquisition uncertainty, which management believes to have seasoned adequately
that it was no longer warranted. The second was related to the CECL model and the related uncertainty. The uncertainty surrounded the
newness of the model and potential regulatory scrutiny. Following two exam cycles, management elected to remove the factor. Also,
during the quarter, historical loss rates continued to decline, which lowers the required reserve. The historical loss rate declined in most
segments. Based on management’s analysis of the current portfolio, an evaluation that includes consideration of changes in CECL model
assumptions of credit quality, economic conditions, and loan composition, management believes the allowance is adequate.
Net charge-offs for 2022 were $6.5 million as compared to $2.6 million for 2021 and $3.5 million for 2020. Non-accrual loans, excluding
TDR’s, decreased to $8.5 million at December 31, 2022 from $9.6 million at December 31, 2021. Loans past due 90 days and still on
accrual increased to $1.1 million compared to $515 thousand at December 31, 2021. On July 12, 2022, the Corporation sold seven
classified non-farm nonresidential commercial loans, which were acquired in the two acquisitions in 2019 and 2021, with a total principal
balance of $14.9 million. The net recovery on the sale of $361 thousand includes the charge-off of the seven loans of $2,145 thousand,
netted by the $2,072 thousand reserve on those loans, previously charged off in the period, and the $434 thousand unamortized discount
37
remaining from the acquisitions. As the related charge offs were previously reserved for and related to acquired loans, the increase in
net charge offs for the year does not have a significant impact on the future expected losses.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Non-interest income of $46.7 million increased $4.6 million from the $42.1 million earned in 2021. The change in non-interest income
from 2021 to 2022 was primarily driven by a $4.0 million legal settlement received in February, 2022, and a $2.5 million bank owned
life insurance mortality payment. The Corporation does not expect these items to reoccur.
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES
Non-interest expenses increased to $126.0 million in 2022 from $117.4 million in 2021. The year-over-year changes are, in part,
impacted by the acquisition of Hancock Bancorp in the fourth quarter of 2021.
INCOME TAXES
The Corporation’s federal income tax provision was $16.7 million in 2022 compared to $12.6 million in 2021. The overall effective tax
rate in 2022 of 19.0% decreased as compared to a 2021 effective rate of 19.2%.
COMPARISON OF 2021 TO 2020
Net income for 2021 was $53.0 million, or $4.02 per share versus $53.8 million, or $3.93 per share for 2020. The decrease in
2021 net income is due to increased expenses from the Hancock acquisition, as well as declining interest rates.
Net interest income decreased $2.9 million in 2021 compared to 2020. The provision for credit losses decreased $8.0 million from $10.5
million in 2020 to $2.5 million in 2021. Non-interest expenses increased $4.6 million and non-interest income decreased $392 thousand.
The increase in non-interest expenses was largely due to the acquisition of HopFed, Inc.
The provision for income taxes increased $934 thousand from 2020 to 2021 and the effective tax rate increased to 19.2% in 2021 from
17.8% in 2020. The increase is primarily due to increase of general business tax credits benefits earned in 2020.
COMPARISON AND DISCUSSION OF 2022 BALANCE SHEET TO 2021
The Corporation’s total assets decreased 3.6% or $185.8 million at December 31, 2022, from a year earlier. Available-for-sale securities
decreased $29.0 million at December 31, 2022, from the previous year. Loans, net increased by $260.1 million to $3.03 billion. Deposits
decreased $40.7 million while borrowings decreased by $28.8 million. Total shareholders’ equity decreased $107.3 million to $475.3
million at December 31, 2022. Accumulated other comprehensive income decreased $137.6 million primarily due to the market value
of the securities portfolio, which reflected the large decrease in securities pricing. In 2022 dividends paid by the Corporation totaled
$1.17 per share. There were also 29,966 shares from the treasury with a value of $1.45 million that were contributed to the ESOP plan
in 2022 compared to 31,355 shares with a value of $1.40 million in 2021.
Following is an analysis of the components of the Corporation’s balance sheet.
SECURITIES
The Corporation’s investment strategy seeks to maximize income from the investment portfolio while using it as a risk management
tool and ensuring safety of principal and capital. During 2022 the portfolio’s balance decreased by 2.1%. The average life of the portfolio
38
increased from 5.0 years in 2021 to 6.9 years in 2022. The portfolio structure will continue to provide cash flows to be reinvested during
2023.
1 year and less
Balance Rate Balance Rate
1 to 5 years
5 to 10 years
Over 10 Years
Balance
Rate
Balance
Rate
2022
Total
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
U.S. government sponsored
entity mortgage-backed securities
and agencies and U.S. Treasury
(1)
Collateralized mortgage
obligations (1)
States and political subdivisions
Collateralized debt obligations
TOTAL
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
U.S. government sponsored
entity mortgage-backed
securities and agencies (1)
Collateralized mortgage
obligations (1)
States and political subdivisions
Collateralized debt obligations
TOTAL
$ 5,066 1.91 % $ 22,871 2.05 % $ 37,360 3.91 % $ 666,045 2.44 % $ 731,342
11 1.66 %
6,473 2.18 %
5,018 3.58 % 31,550 2.80 %
— %
203,485
392,668
2,986
—
$ 10,095 2.74 % $ 60,894 2.45 % $ 121,529 3.07 % $ 1,137,963 2.48 % $ 1,330,481
189,274 2.47 %
279,658 2.62 %
— %
7,727 2.70 %
76,442 2.70 %
— %
— %
2,986
—
—
1 year and less
Balance Rate Balance Rate
1 to 5 years
5 to 10 years
Over 10 Years
Balance
Rate
Balance
Rate
2021
Total
$ 12,784 2.37 % $ 28,466 1.84 % $ 42,881 3.96 % $ 678,295 2.15 % $ 762,426
7,516 2.15 %
688 3.79 %
3,449 2.17 %
5,358 3.27 % 34,438 2.97 % 75,506 2.68 %
— %
175,005
418,724
3,359
—
21,591 2.56 % 63,592 2.47 % 125,903 3.08 % 1,148,428 2.28 % 1,359,514
163,352 2.32 %
303,422 2.57 %
— %
— %
— %
3,359
—
—
(1) Distribution of maturities is based on the estimated life of the asset.
(1) Distribution of maturities is based on the estimated life of the asset.
Net unrealized gain/loss on available for sale securities decreased $188.1 million from a net unrealized gain of $19.9 million in 2021 to
a net unrealized loss of $168.2 million in 2022. This decrease was primarily due to the significant decline in the markets in 2022. The
decrease is not related to credit, but due to interest rates. The Corporation does not expect realized losses, as there is no intent to sell at
a loss.
LOAN PORTFOLIO
Loans outstanding by major category as of December 31 for each of the last five years and the maturities at year end 2022 are set forth
in the following analyses.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Loan Category
Commercial
Residential
Consumer
TOTAL
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
$ 1,798,260 $ 1,674,066 $ 1,521,711 $ 1,584,447 $ 1,166,352
443,670
341,041
$ 3,060,263 $ 2,812,601 $ 2,606,113 $ 2,652,530 $ 1,951,063
682,077
386,006
664,509
474,026
673,464
588,539
604,652
479,750
39
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
MATURITY DISTRIBUTION
Commercial, financial and agricultural
TOTAL
Residential
Consumer
TOTAL
Loans maturing after one year with:
Fixed interest rates
Variable interest rates
TOTAL
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
Within
One Year
After One
But Within
Five Years
After Five
Years
Total
$
642,069 $
769,205 $
386,986 $ 1,798,260
673,464
588,539
$ 3,060,263
$
$
387,285 $
381,920
769,205 $
344,771
42,215
386,986
The activity in the Corporation’s allowance for credit losses is shown in the following analysis:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Amount of loans outstanding at December 31,
Average amount of loans by year
Allowance for credit losses at beginning of year
Loans charged off:
Commercial
Residential
Consumer
Total loans charged off
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Commercial
Residential
Consumer
Total recoveries
Net loans charged off
Provision charged to expense
CECL adoption
PCD ACL on acquired loans
Balance at end of year
Ratio of net charge-offs during period to average
loans outstanding
2022
$ 3,060,263
$ 2,884,053
48,305
$
2021
$ 2,812,601
$ 2,602,344
44,076
$
2020
$ 2,606,113
$ 2,702,225
19,943
$
2019
$ 2,652,530
$ 2,270,313
20,436
$
2018
$ 1,951,063
$ 1,855,092
19,909
$
3,917
657
11,132
15,706
2,062
759
6,384
9,205
6,501
(2,025)
—
—
39,779
$
2,158
812
5,246
8,216
1,069
616
3,884
5,569
2,647
2,466
—
4,410
48,305
$
1,097
944
6,355
8,396
856
657
3,404
4,917
3,479
10,528
17,084
—
44,076
$
2,616
1,050
7,007
10,673
1,092
1,360
3,028
5,480
5,193
4,700
—
—
19,943
$
1,122
841
6,868
8,831
606
639
2,345
3,590
5,241
5,768
—
—
20,436
$
0.23 %
0.10 %
0.13 %
0.23 %
0.22 %
The allowance is maintained at an amount management believes sufficient to absorb expected losses in the loan portfolio. Monitoring
loan quality and maintaining an adequate allowance is an ongoing process overseen by senior management and the loan review function.
On at least a quarterly basis, a formal analysis of the adequacy of the allowance is prepared and reviewed by management and the Board
of Directors. This analysis serves as a point in time assessment of the level of the allowance and serves as a basis for provisions for
credit losses. The loan quality monitoring process includes assigning loan grades and the use of a watch list to identify loans of concern.
The analysis of the allowance for credit losses includes the allocation of specific amounts of the allowance to individually evaluated
loans, generally based on an analysis of the collateral securing those loans. Portions of the allowance are also allocated to loan portfolios,
based upon a variety of factors including historical loss experience, trends in the type and volume of the loan portfolios, trends in
delinquent and non-performing loans, and economic trends affecting our market, including current conditions and reasonable and
supportable forecasts about the future. These components are added together and compared to the balance of our allowance at the
evaluation date. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans decreased to 1.30% at year-end 2022 compared to 1.72%
40
at year-end 2021. The decrease was the result of several factors. The first was the annual model recalibration. Each year, in the first
quarter, management reviews each model variable to determine if adjustments are necessary to improve the model’s predictability. In
the first quarter 2022 the delay periods were shortened to pick up more recent losses. Also, the qualitative factor maximum scorecard
ranges for certain cohorts were reduced, which reduced the reserve. Secondly, management removed two qualitative factors that were
deemed no longer applicable. The first was related to acquisition uncertainty, which management believes to have seasoned adequately
that it was no longer warranted. The second was related to the CECL model and the related uncertainty. The uncertainty surrounded the
newness of the model and potential regulatory scrutiny. Following two exam cycles, management elected to remove the factor. Also,
during the quarter, historical loss rates continued to decline, which lowers the required reserve. The historical loss rate declined in most
segments. The declines in historical loss rates were offset by increased qualitative factors due to the concerns of continuing inflation
and overall economic conditions during the year, exclusive of the recalibration items noted above. Based on management’s analysis of
the current portfolio, an evaluation that includes consideration of changes in CECL model assumptions of credit quality, economic
conditions, and loan composition, management believes the allowance is adequate. Non-performing loans of $13.4 million at
December 31, 2022 decreased from $14.9 million at December 31, 2021.
The table below presents the allocation of the allowance to the loan portfolios at year-end.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Commercial
Residential
Consumer
Unallocated
TOTAL ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
2022
12,949 $
14,568
12,104
158
39,779 $
$
$
Years Ended December 31,
2020
13,925 $
19,142
11,009
—
44,076 $
2021
18,883 $
18,316
10,721
385
48,305 $
2019
8,945 $
1,302
8,304
1,392
19,943 $
2018
9,848
1,313
7,481
1,794
20,436
NONPERFORMING LOANS
Management monitors the components and status of nonperforming loans as a part of the evaluation procedures used in determining the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. It is the Corporation’s policy to discontinue the accrual of interest on loans where, in
management’s opinion, serious doubt exists as to collectability. The amounts shown below represent non-accrual loans, loans which
have been restructured to provide for a reduction or deferral of interest or principal because of deterioration in the financial condition of
the borrower and those loans which are past due more than 90 days where the Corporation continues to accrue interest. Restructured
loans decreased in 2022 and increased in 2021 due to the decreased number and balance of loans added combined with the continued
receipt of payments in accordance with the restructuring terms. Additional information regarding restructured loans is available in the
footnotes to the financial statements.
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
Non-accrual loans
Accruing restructured loans
Nonaccrual restructured loans
Accruing loans past due over 90 days
11,554 $ 9,590 $
15,367 $ 9,535 $
$
3,390
413
1,119
3,897
902
515
3,052
1,154
2,324
3,318
876
1,610
10,974
3,702
1,104
798
$
16,476 $
14,904 $
21,897 $
15,339 $
16,578
Ratio of the allowance for credit losses as a percentage of non-performing
loans
296.8 %
324.1 %
226.8 %
130.0 %
123.0 %
The ratio of the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was 296.79% at December 31, 2022, compared to
324.11% in 2021. In the footnotes to the financial statements the amount reported for nonperforming loans is the recorded investment
41
which includes accrued interest receivable. The following loan categories comprise significant components of the nonperforming loans
at December 31, 2022 and 2021:
Non-accrual loans
Commercial loans
Residential loans
Consumer loans
Past due 90 days or more
Commercial loans
Residential loans
Consumer loans
2022
2021
$
$
$
$
4,874
3,715
2,965
11,554
112
1,007
—
1,119
42 % $
32 %
26 %
100 % $
10 % $
90 %
— %
100 % $
4,991
3,049
1,550
9,590
14
410
91
515
52 %
32 %
16 %
100 %
3 %
79 %
18 %
100 %
Management considers the present allowance to be appropriate and adequate to cover expected losses inherent in the loan portfolio
based on the current economic environment. However, future economic changes cannot be predicted. Deteriorating economic conditions
could result in an increase in the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio and an increase in the potential for credit losses.
DEPOSITS
The information below presents the average amount of deposits and rates paid on those deposits for 2022, 2021 and 2020.
2022
2021
2020
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits
Interest-bearing demand deposits
Savings deposits
Time deposits: $100,000 or more
Other time deposits
TOTAL
Rate
Rate
Rate
Amount
$ 891,042
1,511,232
1,523,198
172,916
310,122
$ 4,408,510
Amount
$ 717,764
0.65 % 1,309,682
0.24 % 1,489,545
214,976
1.15 %
305,909
0.41 %
$ 4,037,876
Amount
$ 660,011
0.15 % 1,061,745
0.05 % 1,221,005
260,314
1.36 %
329,661
0.81 %
$ 3,532,736
0.27 %
0.12 %
1.88 %
1.05 %
The maturities of certificates of deposit of more than $100 thousand outstanding at December 31, 2022, are summarized as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
3 months or less
Over 3 through 6 months
Over 6 through 12 months
Over 12 months
TOTAL
OTHER BORROWINGS
$
$
28,290
30,310
56,504
48,446
163,550
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank decreased to $9.6 million in 2022 compared to $15.9 million in 2021. The Asset/Liability
Committee reviews these funding sources and considers the related strategies on a monthly basis. See Interest Rate Sensitivity and
Liquidity below for more information.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Bank regulatory agencies have established capital adequacy standards which are used extensively in their monitoring and control of the
industry. These standards relate capital to level of risk by assigning different weightings to assets and certain off-balance-sheet activity.
As shown in the footnote to the consolidated financial statements (“Regulatory Matters”), the Corporation’s subsidiary banking
institutions capital exceeds the requirements to be considered well capitalized at December 31, 2022.
42
First Financial Corporation’s objective continues to be to maintain adequate capital to merit the confidence of its customers and
shareholders. To warrant this confidence, the Corporation’s management maintains a capital position which they believe is sufficient to
absorb unforeseen financial shocks without unnecessarily restricting dividends to its shareholders. The Corporation’s dividend payout
ratio for 2022 and 2021 was 21.7% and 28.2%, respectively. The Corporation expects to continue its policy of paying regular cash
dividends, subject to future earnings and regulatory restrictions and capital requirements.
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY AND LIQUIDITY
First Financial Corporation has established risk measures, limits and policy guidelines for managing interest rate risk and liquidity.
Responsibility for management of these functions resides with the Asset/Liability Committee. The primary goal of the Asset/Liability
Committee is to maximize net interest income within the interest rate risk limits approved by the Board of Directors.
Interest Rate Risk: Management considers interest rate risk to be the Corporation’s most significant market risk. Interest rate risk is
the exposure to changes in net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Consistency in the Corporation’s net interest
income is largely dependent on the effective management of this risk. The Asset/Liability position is measured using sophisticated risk
management tools, including earnings simulation and market value of equity sensitivity analysis. These tools allow management to
quantify and monitor both short-and long-term exposure to interest rate risk. Simulation modeling measures the effects of changes in
interest rates, changes in the shape of the yield curve and the effects of embedded options on net interest income. This measure projects
earnings in the various environments over the next three years. It is important to note that measures of interest rate risk have limitations
and are dependent on various assumptions. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely
predict the impact of interest rate fluctuations on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing,
frequency and amount of interest rate changes as well as overall market conditions. The Committee has performed a thorough analysis
of these assumptions and believes them to be valid and theoretically sound. These assumptions are continuously monitored for behavioral
changes.
The Corporation from time to time utilizes derivatives to manage interest rate risk. Management continuously evaluates the merits of
such interest rate risk products but does not anticipate the use of such products to become a major part of the Corporation’s risk
management strategy.
The table below shows the Corporation’s estimated sensitivity profile as of December 31, 2022. The change in interest rates assumes a
parallel shift in interest rates of 100 and 200 basis points. Given a 100 basis point increase in rates, net interest income would increase
1.94% over the next 12 months and increase 4.64% over the following 12 months. Given a 100 basis point decrease in rates, net interest
income would decrease 3.30% over the next 12 months and decrease 6.74% over the following 12 months. These estimates assume all
rate changes occur overnight and management takes no action as a result of this change.
Basis Point
Interest Rate Change
Down 200
Down 100
Up 100
Up 200
Percentage Change in Net Interest Income
12 months
24 months
36 months
(6.75) %
(3.30)
1.94
1.15
(13.97) %
(6.74)
4.64
6.56
(19.42) %
(9.45)
7.30
11.91
Typical rate shock analysis does not reflect management’s ability to react and thereby reduce the effects of rate changes, and represents
a worst-case scenario.
Liquidity Risk Liquidity is measured by the bank’s ability to raise funds to meet the obligations of its customers, including deposit
withdrawals and credit needs. This is accomplished primarily by maintaining sufficient liquid assets in the form of investment securities
and core deposits. The Corporation has $10.1 million of investments that mature throughout the coming 12 months. The Corporation
also anticipates $114.0 million of principal payments from mortgage-backed securities. Given the current rate environment, the
Corporation anticipates $11.2 million in securities to be called within the next 12 months.
The Corporation also has additional sources of liquidity available through secured and unsecured borrowing capacity. These include
upstream correspondents, the Federal Home Loan Bank, and the Federal Reserve Bank.
43
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS
The Corporation has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments that may require future cash
payments.
The Corporation has obligations on deposits as described in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Corporation has obligations on borrowings as described in Notes 11 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Corporation has obligations under its pension, supplemental executive retirement plan and post-retirement medical benefits plan as
described in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Corporation has lease obligations on certain branch properties and equipment as described in Note 8 to the consolidated financial
statements.
Commitments: The following table details the amount and expected maturities of significant commitments as of December 31, 2022.
Further discussion of these commitments is included in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Commitments to extend credit:
Unused loan commitments
Commercial letters of credit
Total
Amount
Committed
One year
or less
Over One
Year
$
820,027
7,834
$
303,554
7,834
$
516,473
—
Commitments to extend credit, including loan commitments, standby and commercial letters of credit do not necessarily represent future
cash requirements, in that these commitments often expire without being drawn upon.
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the
preceding pages of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
44
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of First Financial Corporation (the “Corporation”) has prepared and is responsible for the preparation and accuracy of
the consolidated financial statements and related financial information included in the Annual Report.
The management of the Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Corporation’s internal control over financial
reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Corporation’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Corporation; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the Corporation; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of the Corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the Corporation’s system of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, in relation to
criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting as described in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework,” issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 2013. Based on this assessment, management
concluded that, as of December 31, 2022, its system of internal control over financial reporting is effective and meets the criteria of the
“Internal Control—Integrated Framework.”
Crowe LLP (PCAOB ID: 173) , independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Corporation’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 and has issued a report dated March 8, 2023.
45
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders and the Board of Directors of First Financial Corporation
Terre Haute, Indiana
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of First Financial Corporation (the "Company") as of December 31,
2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income and, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the
"financial statements"). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based
on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company
as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2022 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022,
based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s
financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud,
and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining,
on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
46
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was
communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material
to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the
critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating
the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it
relates.
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans
As discussed in Notes 1, the allowance for credit losses (the “ACL”) is an accounting estimate of expected credit losses over the
estimated life of financial assets carried at amortized cost and off-balance-sheet credit exposures in accordance with Accounting
Standards Update (the “ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments —Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments. The ASU requires financial assets, including the Company's loan portfolio, measured at amortized cost, to be presented at
the net amount expected to be collected. Estimates of expected credit losses for loans are based on relevant information about past
events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts related to macroeconomic conditions, resulting in recognition of
lifetime expected credit losses upon loan origination. Provision for credit loss expense for the year ending December 31, 2022 was $(2.0)
million and the Allowance for Credit Losses at December 31, 2022 was $39.8 million.
The Company utilizes the cohort or open pool methodology for determining the allowance for credit losses on loans. The open pool
methodology identifies and captures the balance of a pool of loans with similar risk characteristics, as of a particular point in time to
form a cohort. The methodology then tracks the respective losses generated by that cohort of loans over their remaining lives. When
past performance may not be representative of future losses, the historical loss experience is supplemented with other current factors
based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These current factors include changes in lending policies or procedures, asset
specific risks, and economic uncertainty in forward-looking forecasts. Economic indicators that are used in determining the economic
forecast factors include unemployment rate, gross domestic product, housing starts and interest rates.
The allowance for credit losses on loans was identified by us as a critical audit matter because of the extent of auditor judgment applied
and significant audit effort to evaluate the significant subjective and complex judgments made by management throughout the
determination process. The principal considerations resulting in our determination included the following:
• Significant auditor judgment and effort were used in evaluating the qualitative factors used in the calculation.
• Significant auditor judgment in evaluating the selection and application of the reasonable and supportable forecast of economic
variables.
• Significant audit effort to test the relevance and reliability of the critical data used in the methodology.
47
The primary procedures performed to address this critical audit matter included:
• Testing the effectiveness of management’s internal controls over the Company’s significant model assumptions and judgments,
loan segmentation, reasonable and supportable forecasts, qualitative factor adjustments, relevance and reliability of data used
in the model, charge-off approval, information systems and model validation
• Testing the effectiveness of controls over the Company’s preparation and review of the allowance for credit loss calculation,
including data used as the basis for adjustments related to the qualitative factors, the development and reasonableness of
qualitative factors and mathematical accuracy and appropriateness of the overall calculation
• Evaluating management’s judgments in the selection and application of reasonable and supportable forecast of economic
variables
• Testing management’s process for developing the qualitative factors and assessing reasonableness, relevance and reliability of
data used to develop factors, including evaluating their judgments and assumptions for reasonableness.
/s/ Crowe LLP
Crowe LLP
We have served as the Corporation’s auditor since 1999.
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 8, 2023
48
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks
Federal funds sold
Securities available-for-sale
Loans:
Commercial
Residential
Consumer
(Less) plus:
Net deferred loan (fees)/costs
Allowance for credit losses
Restricted stock
Accrued interest receivable
Premises and equipment, net
Bank-owned life insurance
Goodwill
Other intangible assets
Other real estate owned
Other assets
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing
Interest-bearing:
Certificates of deposit exceeding the FDIC insurance limits
Other interest-bearing deposits
Short-term borrowings
Other borrowings
Other liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
Shareholders’ equity
Common stock, $0.125 stated value per share; Authorized shares-40,000,000 Issued shares-
16,114,992 in 2022 and 16,096,313 in 2021 Outstanding shares-12,051,964 in 2022 and
12,629,893 in 2021
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)
Less: Treasury shares at cost-4,063,028 in 2022 and 3,466,420 in 2021
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
See accompanying notes.
49
December 31,
2022
2021
$
222,517 $
9,374
1,330,481
688,027
308
1,359,514
1,798,260
673,464
588,539
3,060,263
7,175
(39,779)
3,027,659
15,378
21,288
66,147
115,704
86,985
6,714
337
86,697
4,989,281 $
1,674,066
664,509
474,026
2,812,601
3,294
(48,305)
2,767,590
16,200
16,946
69,522
116,997
86,135
8,024
108
45,728
5,175,099
$
$
857,920 $
914,933
50,608
3,460,343
4,368,871
70,875
9,589
64,653
4,513,988
74,015
3,420,621
4,409,569
93,374
15,937
73,643
4,592,523
2,012
143,185
614,829
(139,974)
(144,759)
475,293
4,989,281 $
2,009
141,979
559,139
(2,426)
(118,125)
582,576
5,175,099
$
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2020
$
146,295 $
128,000 $ 137,241
21,014
9,974
6,018
183,301
16,743
1,243
273
18,259
165,042
(2,025)
13,110
8,762
2,326
152,198
8,158
387
252
8,797
143,401
2,466
12,979
7,952
2,313
160,485
12,801
568
770
14,139
146,346
10,528
167,067
140,935
135,818
5,155
27,540
665
3
559
1,554
1,994
9,246
46,716
65,555
9,764
12,391
2,327
35,986
126,023
87,760
16,651
71,109
5,255
24,700
1,163
114
438
1,849
5,003
3,562
42,084
64,474
8,774
10,174
1,294
32,690
117,406
65,613
12,626
52,987
4,838
21,809
1,888
233
344
1,715
6,626
5,023
42,476
61,931
8,202
10,568
316
31,741
112,758
65,536
11,692
53,844
(144,570)
7,022
(66,439) $
$
(18,488)
6,298
40,797 $
19,269
(2,004)
71,109
$
5.82 $
4.02 $
12,211
13,190
3.93
13,716
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans, including related fees
Securities:
Taxable
Tax-exempt
Other
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits
Short-term borrowings
Other borrowings
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE
NET INTEREST INCOME
Provision for credit losses
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION
FOR CREDIT LOSSES
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Trust and financial services
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts
Other service charges and fees
Securities gains, net
Interchange income
Loan servicing fees
Gain on sales of mortgage loans
Other
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits
Occupancy expense
Equipment expense
FDIC Expense
Other
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
Provision for income taxes
NET INCOME
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Change in unrealized gains/(losses) on securities, net of reclassifications and taxes
Change in funded status of post retirement benefits, net of taxes
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
PER SHARE DATA
Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (in thousands)
See accompanying notes.
50
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accumulated
Other
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Balance, January 1, 2020
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, net
Treasury stock purchases (242,031 shares)
Contribution of 39,029 shares to ESOP
Cash Dividends, $1.05 per share
Balance, December 31, 2020
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, net
Treasury stock purchases (981,132 shares)
Contribution of 31,355 shares to ESOP
Cash Dividends, $1.16 per share
Balance, December 31, 2021
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, net
Treasury stock purchases (626,574 shares)
Contribution of 29,966 shares to ESOP
Cash Dividends, $1.28 per share
Balance, December 31, 2022
See accompanying notes.
Total
Stock
Common Additional
Stock
$ 2,005
—
—
2
—
—
—
2,007
—
—
2
—
—
—
2,009
—
—
3
—
—
—
(68,645) $ 547,125
53,844
17,265
820
(9,220)
1,471
(14,313)
596,992
52,987
(12,190)
807
(42,471)
1,402
(14,951)
582,576
71,109
(137,548)
825
(27,701)
1,451
(15,419)
$ 2,012 $ 143,185 $ 614,829 $ (139,974) $ (144,759) $ 475,293
Comprehensive Treasury
Income/(Loss)
(7,501)
—
17,265
—
—
—
—
9,764
—
(12,190)
—
—
—
—
(2,426)
—
(137,548)
—
—
—
—
Retained
Earnings
481,572
53,844
—
—
—
—
(14,313)
521,103
52,987
—
—
—
—
(14,951)
559,139
71,109
—
—
—
—
(15,419)
Capital
139,694
—
—
818
—
308
—
140,820
—
—
805
—
354
—
141,979
—
—
822
—
384
—
—
—
—
(9,220)
1,163
—
(76,702)
—
—
—
(42,471)
1,048
—
(118,125)
—
—
—
(27,701)
1,067
—
51
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net amortization (accretion) of premiums and discounts on investments
Provision for credit losses
Securities gains
Depreciation and amortization
Provision for deferred income taxes
Net change in accrued interest receivable
Contribution of shares to ESOP
Restricted stock compensation
Gain on sale of mortgage loans
(Gain) Loss on sale of other real estate
Origination of loans held for sale
Proceeds from loans held for sale
Other, net
NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale
Calls, maturities and principal reductions on securities available-for-sale
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
Proceeds from loans sold previously classified as portfolio loans
Loans made to customers, net of repayment
Net change in federal funds sold
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
Redemption of restricted stock
Purchase of restricted stock
Cash received (disbursed) from acquisitions
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned
Additions to premises and equipment
NET CASH FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net change in deposits
Net change in short-term borrowings
Dividends paid
Purchase of treasury stock
Proceeds from other borrowings
Repayments on other borrowings
NET CASH FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS, END OF PERIOD
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2020
$
71,109 $
52,987 $
53,844
6,551
(2,025)
(3)
6,111
(3,150)
(4,342)
1,451
825
(1,994)
55
(65,412)
69,946
(335)
78,787
—
179,597
(345,201)
12,802
(271,503)
(9,066)
—
1,871
(1,049)
—
286
(1,426)
(433,689)
8,433
2,466
(114)
6,154
(1,568)
982
1,402
807
(5,003)
18
(115,144)
123,079
(19,432)
55,067
9,369
262,209
(589,802)
—
31,628
10,463
(10,000)
—
(25)
(23,092)
929
(3,835)
(312,156)
(39,547)
(22,499)
(14,459)
(27,701)
—
(6,402)
(110,608)
(465,510)
688,027
222,517 $
367,985
(22,687)
(14,181)
(42,471)
—
(1,000)
287,646
30,557
657,470
688,027 $
$
7,184
10,528
(233)
6,092
(3,768)
1,566
1,471
820
(6,626)
(761)
(165,524)
170,834
1,998
77,425
28,161
260,631
(365,998)
—
53,144
7,199
—
600
(18)
—
3,941
(3,908)
(16,248)
481,728
35,942
(14,273)
(9,220)
16,700
(42,010)
468,867
530,044
127,426
657,470
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW AND NONCASH INFORMATION:
Cash paid for the year for:
Interest
Income Taxes
$
$
18,463 $
13,525 $
9,144 $
15,025 $
14,845
7,549
See accompanying notes.
52
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
BUSINESS
Organization: The consolidated financial statements of First Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Corporation) include the
parent company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, First Financial Bank, N.A., headquartered in Vigo County, Indiana, and FFB Risk
Management Co., Inc., a captive insurance subsidiary headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada. Inter-company transactions and balances
have been eliminated.
First Financial Bank also has two investment subsidiaries, Portfolio Management Specialists A (Specialists A) and Portfolio
Management Specialists B (Specialists B), which were established to hold and manage certain assets as part of a strategy to better
manage various income streams and provide opportunities for capital creation as needed. Specialists A and Specialists B subsequently
entered into a limited partnership agreement, Global Portfolio Limited Partners. Portfolio Management Specialists B also owns First
Financial Real Estate, LLC. At December 31, 2022, $1.0 billion of securities and loans were owned by these subsidiaries. Specialists A,
Specialists B, Global Portfolio Limited Partners and First Financial Real Estate LLC are included in the consolidated financial
statements. First Financial Bank also has wholly-owned subsidiaries JBMM, LLC and Fort Webb LP, LLC.
The Corporation, which is headquartered in Terre Haute, Indiana, offers a wide variety of financial services including commercial,
mortgage and consumer lending, lease financing, trust account services and depositor services through its four subsidiaries. The
Corporation’s primary source of revenue is derived from loans to customers and investment activities.
The Corporation operates 78 branches in west-central Indiana, east-central Illinois, western Kentucky, and central Tennessee. First
Financial Bank is the largest bank in Vigo County. It operates nine full-service banking branches within the county; one in Daviess
County, Indiana.; three in Clay County, Indiana; one in Greene County, Indiana; one in Knox County, Indiana; two in Parke County,
Indiana; one in Putnam County, Indiana; three in Sullivan County, Indiana; one in Vanderburgh County, Indiana,; three in Vermillion
County, Indiana; four in Champaign County, Illinois; one in Clark County, Illinois; two in Coles County, Illinois; two in Crawford
County, Illinois; one in Franklin County, Illinois; one in Jasper County, Illinois; two in Jefferson County, Illinois; one in Lawrence
County, Illinois; two in Livingston County, Illinois; two in Marion County, Illinois; two in McLean County, Illinois; one in Richland
County, Illinois; six in Vermilion County, Illinois; one in Wayne County, Illinois; one in Breckinridge County, Kentucky; two in
Calloway County, Kentucky; three in Christian County, Kentucky; two in Fulton County, Kentucky; two in Hancock County, Kentucky;
two in Hopkins County, Kentucky; two in Marshall County, Kentucky; one in Todd County, Kentucky; one in Trigg County, Kentucky;
two in Warren County, Kentucky; three in Cheatham County, Tennessee; one in Houston County, Tennessee; and three in Montgomery
County, Tennessee. There are five loan production offices, one in Hamilton County, Indiana; one in Monroe County, Indiana; one in
Vanderburgh County, Indiana; one in Rutherford County, Tennessee; and one in Williamson County, Tennessee. The bank also has a
main office in downtown Terre Haute and an operations center/office building in southern Terre Haute.
Regulatory Agencies: First Financial Corporation is a multi-bank holding company and as such is regulated by various banking
agencies. The holding company is regulated by the Seventh District of the Federal Reserve System. The national bank subsidiary is
regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The state bank subsidiary is jointly regulated by the state banking
organization and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. FFB Risk Management Company is regulated by the State of Nevada
Division of Insurance.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates: To prepare financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, management makes
estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and disclosures provided, and actual results could differ.
Cash Flows: Cash and cash equivalents include cash and demand deposits with other financial institutions. Cash flows are reported for
customer loan and deposit transactions and short-term borrowings. Non-cash transactions include loans transferred to other real estate
of $570 thousand, $43 thousand and $567 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 respectively.
53
Securities: The Corporation classifies all securities as “available for sale.” Securities are classified as available for sale when they might
be sold before maturity. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value with unrealized holdings gains and losses, net of taxes,
reported in other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity.
Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts are amortized on the level yield method
without anticipating prepayments. Mortgage-backed securities are amortized over the expected life. Realized gains and losses on sales
are based on the amortized cost of the security sold. Management evaluates securities for impairment related to credit losses at least on
a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
Loans: Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future until maturity or pay-off are reported at the
principal balance outstanding, net of unearned interest, purchase premiums and discounts, deferred loan fees and costs, and allowance
for credit losses. Loans held for sale are reported at the lower of cost or fair value, on an aggregate basis. Interest income is accrued on
the unpaid principal balance and includes amortization of net deferred loan fees and costs over the loan term without anticipating
prepayments. The recorded investment in loans includes accrued interest receivable and net deferred loan fees and costs. Interest income
is not reported when full loan repayment is in doubt, typically when the loan is collateral dependent or payments are significantly past
due. Past-due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan.
All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on non-accrual is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans
is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status
when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. In all
cases, loans are placed on non-accrual or charged-off if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. The above policies are
consistent for all segments of loans.
Purchased Credit Deteriorated (PCD) Loans: The Corporation purchases individual loans and groups of loans, some of which have
experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination. PCD loans are recorded at the amount paid. An allowance for
credit losses is determined using the same methodology as other loans held for investment. The initial allowance for credit losses
determined on a collective basis is allocated to individual loans. The sum of the loan’s purchase price and initial allowance for credit
losses becomes its amortized cost basis. The difference between the initial amortized cost basis and the par value of the loan is a noncredit
discount or premium, which is accreted or amortized into interest income over the life of the loan. Subsequent changes to the allowance
for credit losses are recorded through provision for credit losses.
Concentration of Credit Risk: Most of the Corporation’s business activity is with customers located within west-central Indiana, east-
central Illinois, western Kentucky, and middle and western Tennessee. Therefore, the Corporation’s exposure to credit risk is
significantly affected by changes in the economy of this area. A major economic downturn in this area would have a negative effect on
the Corporation’s loan portfolio.
The risk characteristics of each loan portfolio segment are as follows:
Commercial
Commercial loans are predominately loans to expand a business or finance asset purchases. The underlying risk in the Commercial loan
segment is primarily a function of the reliability and sustainability of the cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying
collateral securing the transaction. From time to time, the cash flows of borrowers may be less than historical or as planned. In addition,
the underlying collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets financed or other
business assets and most commercial loans are further supported by a personal guarantee. However, in some instances, short term loans
are made on an unsecured basis. Agriculture production loans are typically secured by growing crops and generally secured by other
assets such as farm equipment. Production loans are subject to weather and market pricing risks. The Corporation has established
underwriting standards and guidelines for all commercial loan types.
The Corporation strives to maintain a geographically diverse commercial real estate portfolio. Commercial real estate loans are primarily
underwritten based upon the cash flows of the underlying real estate or from the cash flows of the business conducted at the real estate.
Generally, these types of loans will be fully guaranteed by the principal owners of the real estate and loan amounts must be supported
by adequate collateral value. Commercial real estate loans may be adversely affected by factors in the local market, the regional
economy, or industry specific factors. In addition, Commercial Construction loans are a specific type of commercial real estate loan
54
which inherently carry more risk than loans for completed projects. Since these types of loans are underwritten utilizing estimated costs,
feasibility studies, and estimated absorption rates, the underlying value of the project may change based upon the inaccuracy of these
projections. Commercial construction loans are closely monitored, subject to industry standards, and disbursements are controlled during
the construction process.
Residential
Retail real estate mortgages that are secured by 1-4 family residences are generally owner occupied and include residential real estate
and residential real estate construction loans. The Corporation typically establishes a maximum loan-to-value ratio and generally requires
private mortgage insurance if the ratio is exceeded. The Corporation sells substantially all of its long-term fixed mortgages to secondary
market purchasers. Mortgages sold to secondary market purchasers are underwritten to specific guidelines. The Corporation originates
some mortgages that are maintained in the bank’s loan portfolio. Portfolio loans are generally adjustable rate mortgages and are
underwritten to conform to Qualified Mortgage standards. Several factors are considered in underwriting all Mortgages including the
value of the underlying real estate, debt-to-income ratio and credit history of the borrower. Repayment is primarily dependent upon the
personal income of the borrower and can be impacted by changes in borrower’s circumstances such as changes in employment status
and changes in real estate property values. Risk is mitigated by the sale of substantially all long-term fixed rate mortgages, the
underwriting of portfolio loans to Qualified Mortgage standards and the fact that mortgages are generally smaller individual amounts
spread over a large number of borrowers.
Consumer
The consumer portfolio primarily consists of home equity loans and lines (typically secured by a subordinate lien on a 1-4 family
residence), secured loans (typically secured by automobiles, boats, recreational vehicles, or motorcycles), cash/CD secured, and
unsecured loans. Pricing, loan terms, and loan to value guidelines vary by product line. The underlying value of collateral dependent
loans may vary based on a number of economic conditions, including fluctuations in home prices and unemployment levels.
Underwriting of consumer loans is based on the individual credit profile and analysis of the debt repayment capacity for each borrower.
Payments for consumer loans is typically set-up on equal monthly installments, however, future repayment may be impacted by a change
in economic conditions or a change in the personal income levels of individual customers. Overall risks within the consumer portfolio
are mitigated by the mix of various loan products, lending in various markets and the overall make-up of the portfolio (small loan sizes
and a large number of individual borrowers).
Allowance for Credit Losses: Credit quality of loans is continuously monitored by management and is reflected within the allowance
for credit losses for loans. The allowance for credit losses is an estimate of expected losses inherent within the Company’s loan portfolio.
Credit quality is assessed and monitored by evaluating various attributes and the results of those evaluations are utilized in underwriting
new loans and in our process for estimating expected credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is adjusted by a credit loss expense,
which is reported in earnings, and reduced by the charge-off of loan amounts, net of recoveries. We have made a policy election to
report accrued interest receivable as a separate line item on the balance sheet.
The allowance for credit loss estimation process involves procedures to appropriately consider the unique characteristics of the loan
portfolio segments. These segments are further disaggregated into loan classes based on the level at which credit risk is monitored.
When computing the level of expected credit losses, credit loss assumptions are estimated using a model that categorizes loan pools
based on loss history, delinquency status, and other credit trends and risk characteristics, including current conditions and reasonable
and supportable forecasts about the future. Determining the appropriateness of the allowance is complex and requires judgment by
management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. In future periods evaluations of the overall loan portfolio, in light
of the factors and forecasts then prevailing, may result in significant changes in the allowance and credit loss expense in those future
periods.
We utilize a cohort methodology to determine the allowance for credit losses. This method identifies and captures the balance of a pool
of loans with similar risk characteristics at a particular point in time to form a cohort. Then it tracks the respective losses generated by
that cohort of loans over their remaining life. When past performance may not be representative of future losses, loss rates are adjusted
for qualitative and economic forecast factors.
The allowance level is influenced by loan volumes, loan quality rating migration or delinquency status, changes in historical loss
experience, and other conditions influencing loss expectations, such as reasonable and supportable forecasts of economic conditions.
55
The methodology for estimating the amount of expected credit losses reported in the allowance for credit losses consists of specific and
pooled components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually evaluated. A loan is individually evaluated when the
loan no longer shares similar risk characteristics with other loans in its respective loan pool. If a loan is individually evaluated, a portion
of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported at the fair value of collateral, adjusted for selling costs, if repayment is expected
solely from the collateral. The pooled component covers pools of loans that share similar risk characteristics, and is based on historical
loss experienced since 2008. This historical loss experience is supplemented with other current factors based on the risks present for
each portfolio segment. These current factors include items such as changes in lending policies or procedures, asset specific risks, and
economic uncertainty in forward-looking forecasts. Economic indicators utilized in forecasting include unemployment rate, gross
domestic product, housing starts, and interest rates.
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments to provide for the risk of loss inherent in these
arrangements. Unfunded commitments include funds available for disbursement on commercial and agriculture operating lines,
commercial real estate and residential construction loans, and home equity lines of credit. The allowance is computed using a
methodology similar to that used to determine the allowance for credit losses for loans, modified to take into account the probability of
a drawdown on the commitment. The allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments was $2.1 million at December 31, 2022,
and $3.0 million at December 31, 2021.
Foreclosed Assets: Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosures are initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs
when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. Physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage
loan occurs when legal title is obtained upon completion of foreclosure or when the borrower conveys all interest in the property to
satisfy the loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement. These assets are subsequently accounted
for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. If fair value declines, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense.
Costs after acquisition are expensed.
Premises and Equipment: Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed over the useful lives of the assets, which range from 3 to 5 years for furniture and equipment and 33 to 39 years
for buildings and leasehold improvements.
Restricted Stock: Restricted stock includes Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Indianapolis and Federal Reserve stock. This restricted
stock is carried at cost and periodically evaluated for impairment. Because this stock is viewed as a long-term investment, impairment
is based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.
Servicing Rights: Servicing rights are recognized separately when they are acquired through sales of loans. When mortgage loans are
sold, servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value with the income statement effect recorded in gains on sales of loans. Fair value
is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based on third-party
valuations that incorporate assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to
service, the discount rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default rates and losses. All classes of servicing assets are
subsequently measured using the amortization method, which requires servicing rights to be amortized into non-interest income in
proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying loans.
Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to carrying amount. Impairment is
determined by stratifying rights into groupings based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type and investor
type. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual grouping, to the extent that fair value is less than the
carrying amount. If the Corporation later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular grouping, a
reduction of the allowance may be recorded as an increase to income. Changes in valuation allowances are reported with Other Service
Charges and Fees on the income statement. The fair values of servicing rights are subject to significant fluctuations as a result of changes
in estimated and actual prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.
Servicing fee income, which is included in Other Service Charges and Fees on the income statement, is for fees earned for servicing
loans.
The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income when
earned. The amortization of mortgage servicing rights is netted against loan servicing fee income. Servicing fees totaled $1.4 million,
56
$1.3 million and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Late fees and ancillary fees related to loan
servicing are not material.
Stock based compensation: Compensation cost is recognized for restricted stock awards and units issued to employees based on the
fair value of these awards at the date of grant. Market price of the Corporation’s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted
stock awards. Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period.
Transfers of Financial Assets: Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been
relinquished. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when the assets have been isolated from the Corporation, the
transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred
assets, and the Corporation does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them
before their maturity.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance: The Corporation has purchased life insurance policies on certain key executives. Bank-owned life
insurance is recorded at its cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized. Income on the investments in life insurance is
included in other interest income.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: Goodwill resulting from business combinations prior to January 1, 2009 represents the excess
of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill resulting from business combinations after
January 1, 2009 represents the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired that are not individually identified and
separately recognized. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite
useful life are not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually. The Corporation has selected November 30 as the date to
perform the annual impairment test. The final results determined that there was no impairment of goodwill. Intangible assets with definite
useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with
an indefinite life on our balance sheet.
Other intangible assets consist of core deposit assets arising from the whole bank and branch acquisitions. They are initially measured
at fair value and then are amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives, which are 10 and 12 years, respectively.
Long-Term Assets: Premises and equipment and other long-term assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying
amount may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are recorded at fair value.
Benefit Plans: Pension expense is the net of service and interest cost, return on plan assets and amortization of gains and losses not
immediately recognized. The amount contributed is determined by a formula as decided by the Board of Directors. Deferred
compensation and supplemental retirement plan expense allocates the benefits over years of service.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan: Shares of treasury stock are issued to the ESOP and compensation expense is recognized based
upon the total market price of shares when contributed.
Deferred Compensation Plan: Prior to 2011, a deferred compensation plan covered all directors. Under the plan, the Corporation pays
each director, or their beneficiary, the amount of fees deferred plus interest over 10 years, beginning when the director achieves age 65.
A liability is accrued for the obligation under these plans. The expense incurred for the deferred compensation for each of the last
three years was $78 thousand, $117 thousand, and $111 thousand, resulting in a deferred compensation liability of $1.2 million at
December 31, 2022 and $1.3 million at December 31, 2021. There are no deferred compensation plans now in effect for directors.
Incentive Plans: A long-term incentive plan established in 2000 provides for the payment of incentive rewards as a 15-year annuity to
all directors and certain key officers. That plan was in place through December 31, 2009, and compensation expense is recognized over
the service period. Payments under the plan generally did not begin until the earlier of January 1, 2015, or the January 1 immediately
following the year in which the participant reaches age 65. There was no compensation expense related to this plan for 2022, 2021 and
2020. There is a liability of $4.8 million and $6.0 million as of year-end 2022 and 2021. In 2011 the Corporation adopted the 2011
Short-term Incentive Plan and the 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan designed to reward key officers based on certain performance
measures. The short-term portion of the plan is paid out within 75 days of year end and the long-term plan vests over a three year period
and is paid out within 75 days of the end of each vesting period. The compensation expense related to the plans in 2022, 2021 and 2020
57
was $2.0 million, $2.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and resulted in a liability of $1.6 million at December 31, 2022 and $1.8
million at December 31, 2021.
The Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan is a long term incentive plan that was designed to align the interests of participants with the interest
of shareholders. Under the plan, awards may be made based on certain performance measures. The grants are made in restricted stock
units that are subject to a vesting schedule.
Income Taxes: Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets
and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying
amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax
assets to the amount expected to be realized.
A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination,
with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50%
likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded.
The Corporation recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments: Financial instruments include credit instruments, such as commitments to
make loans and standby letters of credit, issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the
exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are
funded.
Earnings Per Share: Earnings per common share is net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the period. The Corporation does not have any potentially dilutive securities as the restricted stock awards are included in
outstanding shares. Earnings and dividends per share are restated for stock splits and dividends through the date of issue of the financial
statements.
Comprehensive Income (Loss): Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other
comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and changes in the funded status of
the retirement plans, net of taxes, which are also recognized as separate components of equity.
Loss Contingencies: Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as
liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount of range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not
believe there are currently such matters that will have a material effect on the financial statements.
Dividend Restriction: Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the bank to
the holding company or by the holding company to shareholders.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other
assumptions, as more fully disclosed in a separate note. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment
regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items.
Changes in assumptions or market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.
Operating Segment: While the Corporation’s chief decision-makers monitor the revenue streams of the various products and services,
the operating results of significant segments are similar and operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a
corporate-wide basis. Accordingly, all of the Corporation’s financial service operations are considered by management to be aggregated
in one reportable operating segment, which is banking.
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted:
In March 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2020-04 “Reference
Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” These amendments provide
temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform. The ASU provides optional expedients
58
and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to
meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued. It is intended to help stakeholders
during the global market-wide reference rate transition period. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01 which clarifies that
certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are
affected by the discounting transition. In December 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-06, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848):
Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848”, which defers the sunset date of relief provisions within Topic 848 from December 31, 2022
to December 31, 2024. The objective of the guidance in Topic 848 is to provide relief during the transition period. The guidance is
effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2024 The Corporation has discontinued originating LIBOR based
loans and has a plan in place to transition all LIBOR indexed loans to term SOFR.
Recently Issued Not Yet Effective Accounting Pronouncements:
In March 2022, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2022-02, “Financial
Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures” (ASU 2022-02). ASU 2022-02
eliminates the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) in ASC 310-40, “Receivables - Troubled Debt
Restructurings by Creditors” for entities that have adopted the current expected credit loss (CECL) model introduced by ASU 2016-
13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13).
ASU 2022-02 also requires that public business entities disclose current-period gross charge-offs by year of origination for financing
receivables and net investments in leases within the scope of Subtopic 326-20, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses—Measured at
Amortized Cost”. ASU 2022-02 is effective for the Corporation for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim
periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Corporation is evaluating the effect that ASU 2022-02 will have
on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In June 2022, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2022-03 “Fair
Value Measurements (Topic 820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions.” These
amendments clarify that a contractual restriction on the sale of an equity security is not considered part of the unit of account of the
equity security and, therefore, is not considered in measuring fair value. ASU 2022-03 is effective for the Corporation for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption is permitted. The
Corporation is evaluating the effect that ASU 2022-03 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
59
2.
FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
Accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize
the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure
fair value:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) of identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the
measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted
prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The fair value of securities available-for-sale is determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges
(Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying
exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted
securities (Level 2 inputs).
For those securities that cannot be priced using quoted market prices or observable inputs, a Level 3 valuation is determined. These
securities are primarily trust preferred securities, which are priced using Level 3 due to current market illiquidity, and state and municipal
securities. The fair value of the trust preferred securities is obtained from a third party provider without adjustment. Management obtains
values from other pricing sources to validate the Standard & Poors pricing that they currently utilizes. The fair value of state and
municipal obligations are derived by comparing the securities to current market rates plus an appropriate credit spread to determine an
estimated value. Illiquidity spreads are then considered. Credit reviews are performed on each of the issuers. The significant
unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Corporation’s state and municipal obligations are credit spreads related
to specific issuers. Significantly higher credit spread assumptions would result in significantly lower fair value measurement.
Conversely, significantly lower credit spreads would result in a significantly higher fair value measurement.
The fair value of derivatives is based on valuation models using observable market data as of the measurement date (Level 2 inputs).
60
December 31, 2022
Fair Value Measurements Using
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Level 1
Level 2
98,473 $
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $ 1,325,950 $
620,248
9,677
203,485
358,608
32,515
2,944
—
Level 3
Total
98,473
— $
620,248
—
9,677
—
203,485
—
360,153
1,545
32,515
—
2,944
—
2,986
2,986
4,531 $ 1,330,481
2,838
(2,838)
December 31, 2021
Fair Value Measurements Using
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Level 1
$
$
Level 2
120,123
626,428
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $ 1,354,260 $
15,671
175,005
378,203
38,626
204
—
Level 3
$
Total
120,123
—
626,428
—
15,671
—
175,005
—
380,098
1,895
38,626
—
204
—
3,359
3,359
5,254 $ 1,359,514
1,030
(1,030)
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
U.S. Government agencies
Mortgage Backed Securities-residential
Mortgage Backed Securities-commercial
Collateralized mortgage obligations
State and municipal
Municipal taxable
U.S. Treasury
Collateralized debt obligations
TOTAL
Derivative Assets
Derivative Liabilities
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
U.S. Government agencies
Mortgage Backed Securities-residential
Mortgage Backed Securities-commercial
Collateralized mortgage obligations
State and municipal
Municipal taxable
U.S. Treasury
Collateralized debt obligations
TOTAL
Derivative Assets
Derivative Liabilities
$
$
$
$
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during 2022 and 2021.
61
The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on
a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the twelve months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Year Ended
December 31, 2022
State and
municipal
Collateralized
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1
Total realized/unrealized gains or losses
Included in earnings
Included in other comprehensive income
Transfers
Settlements
Ending balance, December 31
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1
Total realized/unrealized gains or losses
Included in earnings
Included in other comprehensive income
Purchases
Settlements
Ending balance, December 31
obligations debt obligations Other securities
$
3,359 $
1,895 $
— $
Total
5,254
—
—
—
(350)
1,545 $
—
(373)
—
—
2,986 $
$
—
—
—
—
— $
—
(373)
—
(350)
4,531
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
State and
municipal
obligations
$
Collateralized
debt obligations Other securities
Total
1,895 $
3,136
$
—
$
5,031
—
—
—
—
1,895 $
—
223
—
—
3,359 $
—
—
—
—
— $
—
223
—
—
5,254
$
There were no unrealized gains and losses recorded in earnings for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 or 2020.
Other real estate owned is valued at Level 3. Other real estate owned at December 31, 2022 with a value of $337 thousand was reduced
by $25 thousand for fair value adjustment. At December 31, 2022 other real estate owned was comprised of $39 thousand from
commercial loans and $298 thousand from residential loans. Other real estate owned at December 31, 2021 with a value of $108 thousand
was reduced by zero for fair value adjustment. At December 31, 2021 other real estate owned was comprised of $68 thousand from
commercial loans and $40 thousand from residential loans.
Fair value for collateral dependent loans is measured based on the value of the collateral securing those loans, and is determined using
several methods. Generally the fair value of real estate is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers. Appraisals
for real estate generally use three methods to derive value: cost, sales or market comparison and income approach. The cost method
bases value on the cost to replace current property. The market comparison evaluates the sales price of similar properties in the same
market area. The income approach considers net operating income generated by the property and the investor’s required return. The
final fair value is based on a reconciliation of these three approaches. If an appraisal is not available, the fair value may be determined
by using a cash flow analysis, a broker’s opinion of value, the net present value of future cash flows, or an observable market price from
an active market. Fair value of other real estate is based upon the current appraised values of the properties as determined by qualified
licensed appraisers and the Company’s judgment of other relevant market conditions. Appraisals are obtained annually and reductions
in value are recorded as a valuation through a charge to expense. The primary unobservable input used by management in estimating
fair value are additional discounts to the appraised value to consider market conditions and the age of the appraisal, which are based on
management’s past experience in resolving these types of properties. These discounts range from 0% to 50%. Values for non-real estate
collateral, such as business equipment, are based on appraisals performed by qualified licensed appraisers or the customers financial
statements. Values for non real estate collateral use much higher discounts than real estate collateral. Other real estate and collateral
dependent loans carried at fair value are primarily comprised of smaller balance properties.
62
The following tables present quantitative information about recurring and non-recurring Level 3 fair value measurements at
December 31, 2022 and 2021.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
State and municipal obligations
Collateralized debt obligations
Collateral dependent loans
$
$
$
Fair Value
Valuation Technique(s)
Unobservable Input(s)
1,545 Discounted cash flow Discount rate
2,986 Discounted cash flow Discount rate
Range
3.73%-4.44 %
5.34 %
4,477 Discounted cash flow
Discount rate for age of appraisal
and market conditions
0.00%-50.00 %
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
State and municipal obligations
Collateralized debt obligations
Fair Value
Valuation Technique(s)
Unobservable Input(s)
$
$
1,895 Discounted cash flow Discount rate
3,359 Discounted cash flow Discount rate
Range
3.41%-4.44 %
1.83 %
Collateral dependent loans
12,839 Discounted cash flow
Discount rate for age of appraisal
and market conditions
0.00%-50.00 %
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments are shown below. Carrying amount is the estimated fair value
for cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term and certain other
borrowings, and variable-rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. Security fair values are determined as previously
described. It is not practicable to determine the fair value of restricted stock due to restrictions placed on their transferability. For fixed-
rate loans or deposits, variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, and for longer-term borrowings, fair
value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. Loan fair value estimates
represent an exit price for 2022 and 2021. Fair values for collateral dependent loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis
or underlying collateral values. Fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing. The fair value of off-balance sheet
items is not considered material.
The carrying amount and estimated fair value of assets and liabilities are presented in the tables below and were determined based on
the above assumptions:
December 31, 2022
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Cash and due from banks
Federal funds sold
Securities available-for-sale
Restricted stock
Loans, net
Accrued interest receivable
Deposits
Short-term borrowings
Other borrowings
Accrued interest payable
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Cash and due from banks
Federal funds sold
Securities available-for-sale
Restricted stock
Loans, net
Accrued interest receivable
Deposits
Short-term borrowings
Other borrowings
Accrued interest payable
Carrying
Value
222,517 $ 29,400 $
Level 1
$
— $
—
4,531
n/a
Fair Value
Level 3
Level 2
193,117 $
9,374
1,325,950
n/a
—
5,529
(4,369,402)
(70,875)
(8,788)
(483)
2,930,680
15,759
—
—
—
—
Total
222,517
9,374
1,330,481
n/a
2,930,680
21,288
(4,369,402)
(70,875)
(8,788)
(483)
—
—
n/a
—
—
—
—
—
—
9,374
1,330,481
15,378
3,027,659
21,288
(4,368,871)
(70,875)
(9,589)
(483)
December 31, 2021
Level 3
Fair Value
$
$
Level 2
663,126
308
Carrying
Value
Level 1
688,027 $ 24,901
—
—
n/a
—
4,709
—
— (4,418,117)
(93,374)
—
(16,483)
—
(687)
—
308
1,359,514
16,200
2,767,590
16,946
(4,409,569)
(93,374)
(15,937)
(687)
$
—
—
5,254
1,354,260
n/a
n/a
— 2,682,257
12,237
$
Total
688,027
308
1,359,514
n/a
2,682,257
16,946
— (4,418,117)
(93,374)
—
(16,483)
—
(687)
—
63
3.
RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS:
Certain affiliate banks are required to maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank. The amount of those reserve
balances was zero at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
4.
SECURITIES:
The fair value of securities available-for-sale and related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income were as follows:
December 31, 2022
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
U.S. Government agencies
Mortgage Backed Securities - residential
Mortgage Backed Securities - commercial
Collateralized mortgage obligations
State and municipal obligations
Municipal taxable
U.S. Treasury
Collateralized debt obligations
TOTAL
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
U.S. Government agencies
Mortgage Backed Securities-residential
Mortgage Backed Securities-commercial
Collateralized mortgage obligations
State and municipal obligations
Municipal taxable
U.S. Treasury
Collateralized debt obligations
TOTAL
$
Amortized
Cost
110,226 $
711,131
10,103
228,344
396,522
39,321
2,979
—
$ 1,498,626 $
Unrealized
Gains
$
24
133
—
60
745
41
—
2,986
3,989 $
Unrealized
Losses
(11,777)
(91,016)
Fair Value
$
98,473
620,248
9,677
203,485
360,153
32,515
2,944
2,986
(172,134) $ 1,330,481
(426)
(24,919)
(37,114)
(6,847)
(35)
—
$
Amortized
Cost
118,176 $
628,920
15,480
175,501
362,843
38,445
205
—
December 31, 2021
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
$
2,688
4,387
191
1,272
17,833
396
—
3,359
$
(741)
(6,879)
—
(1,768)
(578)
(215)
(1)
—
120,123
626,428
15,671
175,005
380,098
38,626
204
3,359
(10,182) $ 1,359,514
$ 1,339,570 $
30,126 $
As of December 31, 2022, the Corporation does not have any securities from any issuer, other than the U.S. Government, with an
aggregate book or fair value that exceeds ten percent of shareholders’ equity.
Securities with a carrying value of approximately $946.3 million and $814.7 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were
pledged as collateral for short-term borrowings and for other purposes.
Below is a summary of the gross gains and losses realized by the Corporation on investment sales and calls during the years ended
December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Proceeds
Gross gains
Gross losses
2022
1,565
2021
12,886
$
$
$
6
(3)
274
(160)
2020
36,696
290
(57)
Gains of $6 thousand and losses of $3 thousand in 2022 and gains of $274 thousand and losses of $160 thousand in 2021 and gains of
$290 thousand and losses of $57 thousand in 2020 resulted from redemption premiums on called and sold securities.
64
Contractual maturities of debt securities at year-end 2022 were as follows. Securities not due at a single maturity or with no maturity
date, primarily mortgage-backed and collateralized mortgage obligations, are shown separately.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Due in one year or less
Due after one but within five years
Due after five but within ten years
Due after ten years
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
TOTAL
Available-for-Sale
Amortized
Cost
$
8,031
45,010
88,684
407,323
549,048
949,578
1,498,626 $
Fair
Value
7,984
43,566
83,055
362,466
497,071
833,410
1,330,481
$
$
The following tables show the securities’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time
that individual securities have been in continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
U.S. Government agencies
Mortgage Backed Securities - Residential
Mortgage Backed Securities - Commercial
Collateralized mortgage obligations
State and municipal obligations
Municipal taxable
U.S. Treasury
Total temporarily impaired securities
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
U.S. Government agencies
Mortgage Backed Securities - Residential
Collateralized mortgage obligations
State and municipal obligations
Municipal taxable
U.S. Treasury
Total temporarily impaired securities
Less Than 12 Months
December 31, 2022
More Than 12 Months
Unrealized
Unrealized
9,677
Fair Value
(7,743) $
Fair Value Losses
Fair Value Losses
$ 58,462 $ (4,034) $ 38,959 $
234,488 (19,757) 379,520
97,421 $ (11,777)
(91,016)
(426)
(24,919)
(37,114)
(6,847)
(35)
$ 692,782 $ (63,580) $ 536,618 $ (108,554) $ 1,229,400 $ (172,134)
135,135 (11,331)
233,439 (24,291)
(3,706)
(35)
614,008
9,677
198,927
274,949
31,474
2,944
—
63,792
41,510
12,837
—
(13,588)
(12,823)
(3,141)
—
18,637
2,944
(71,259)
(426)
—
Total
Unrealized
Losses
Less Than 12 Months
December 31, 2021
More Than 12 Months
Total
Unrealized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Fair Value Losses
Fair Value Losses
146 $
Fair Value Losses
$ 48,939 $
436,726
(739) $
(5,281)
60,807
(2) $ 49,085 $
497,533
(741)
(6,879)
(1,768)
(578)
—
(215)
729
(1)
—
$ 628,487 $ (8,121) $ 74,187 $ (2,061) $ 702,674 $ (10,182)
73,530 (1,327) 12,505
(578)
54,040
(195)
15,048
(1)
204
86,035
54,040
15,777
204
(441)
—
(20)
—
(1,598)
The Corporation held 895 investment securities with an amortized cost greater than fair value as of December 31, 2022. The unrealized
losses on collateralized mortgage obligations, all mortgage-backed securities and state and municipal obligations represent negative
adjustments to fair value relative to the rate of interest paid on the securities and not losses related to the creditworthiness of the issuer.
Gross unrealized losses on investment securities were $172.1 million as of December 31, 2022 and $10.2 million as of December 31,
2021. Management does not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not that management would be required to sell the securities
prior to their anticipated recovery. Management believes the value will recover as the securities approach maturity or market rates
change.
Management evaluates securities for impairment related to credit losses at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic
or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. The investment securities portfolio is evaluated for impairment related to credit losses
by segregating the portfolio into two general segments.
65
In evaluating for impairment, management considers the reason for the decline, the extent of the decline, the duration of the decline and
whether the Corporation intends to sell a security or is more likely than not to be required to sell a security before recovery of its
amortized cost. If an entity intends to sell or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its
amortized cost basis, the security’s amortized cost is written down to fair value through income. If an entity does not intend to sell the
security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis
less any current-period loss, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses is recorded, limited to the amount that the fair value
of the security is less than its amortized cost basis. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is
recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes.
In prior years, a significant portion of the total unrealized losses relates to collateralized debt obligations that were separately evaluated
under FASB ASC 325-40, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. Based upon qualitative considerations, such as a
downgrade in credit rating or further defaults of underlying issuers during the year, and an analysis of expected cash flows, we
determined that three CDOs included in collateralized debt obligations were other-than-temporarily impaired. One of the CDO’s was
called in first quarter 2017. A second was called in second quarter 2018. The remaining CDO has a contractual balance of $3.7 million
at December 31, 2022 which has been reduced to $3.0 million by $750 thousand of interest payments received, $3.0 million of
cumulative credit loss charges recorded through earnings to date and increased by $3.0 million recorded in other comprehensive income.
These securities are collateralized by trust preferred securities issued primarily by bank holding companies, but certain pools do include
a limited number of insurance companies.
The table below presents a rollforward of the credit losses recognized in earnings for the years presented:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance
Reductions for securities called during the period
Ending balance
2022
2,974
$
2021
2,974
$
—
2,974 $
—
2,974 $
2020
2,974
—
2,974
$
$
66
5. LOANS:
Loans are summarized as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Commercial
Residential
Consumer
Total gross loans
Deferred costs, net
Allowance for credit losses
TOTAL
December 31,
2022
$
1,798,260
673,464
588,539
3,060,263
7,175
(39,779)
3,027,659 $
2021
1,674,066
664,509
474,026
2,812,601
3,294
(48,305)
2,767,590
$
$
The Corporation periodically sells residential mortgage loans it originates based on the overall loan demand of the Corporation and the
outstanding balances in the residential mortgage portfolio. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, loans held for sale were $1.7 million and
$4.2 million, respectively, and are included in the totals above.
In the normal course of business, the Corporation’s subsidiary banks make loans to directors and executive officers and to their
associates. In 2022, the aggregate dollar amount of these loans to directors and executive officers who held office amounted to $50.9
million at the beginning of the year. During 2022, advances of $46.2 million, repayments of $45.7 million, and reductions for the removal
of The Morris Plan directors of $5.3 million were made with respect to related party loans for an aggregate dollar amount outstanding
of $46.1 million at December 31, 2022.
Loans serviced for others, which are not reported as assets, total $518.1 million and $542.8 million at year-end 2022 and 2021. Custodial
escrow balances maintained in connection with serviced loans were $2.7 million and $3.0 million at year-end 2022 and 2021.
Activity for capitalized mortgage servicing rights (included in other assets) was as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Servicing rights:
Beginning of year
Additions
Amortized to expense
End of year
2022
December 31,
2021
2020
$
$
1,959 $
489
(681)
1,767 $
1,601 $
1,094
(736)
1,959 $
1,435
956
(790)
1,601
Third party valuations are conducted periodically for mortgage servicing rights. Based on these valuations, fair values were
approximately $3.3 million and $2.7 million at year end 2022 and 2021. There was no valuation allowance in 2022 or 2021.
Fair value for 2022 was determined using a discount rate of 12.5%, prepayment speeds ranging from 113% to 238%, depending on the
stratification of the specific right. Fair value at year end 2021 was determined using a discount rate of 12.5%, prepayment speeds ranging
from 185% to 453%, depending on the stratification of the specific right. Mortgage servicing rights are amortized over 8 years, the
expected life of the sold loans.
6.
ACQUISITIONS:
On November 5, 2021, the Corporation completed its acquisition of Hancock Bancorp, Inc. and its banking subsidiary, Hancock Bank
and Trust Company. Therefore, the results of Hancock Bancorp have been included in the results of operations beginning on
November 5, 2021. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, each issued and outstanding share of Hancock Bancorp, Inc. common
stock, issued and outstanding, was converted into the right to receive $18.38 per share in cash. The aggregate value of the transaction
was $31.36 million. Acquisition-related costs of $1.2 million are included in the Corporation’s income statement for the year ended
December 31, 2021.
67
Goodwill of $8.4 million arising from the acquisition consisted largely of synergies and the cost savings resulting from the combining
of the operations of the companies. The goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes as the transaction was accounted for as a
tax-free exchange. The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
recognized at the acquisition date.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Consideration
Cash consideration
Measurement
As Initially
Reported
Period
Adjustments
As Adjusted
$
31,358 $
— $
31,358
Fair value of total consideration transferred
$
31,358 $
— $
31,358
Assets acquired
Cash
Investment securities available-for-sale
Federal funds sold
Bank owned life insurance
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
Loans
Premises and equipment
Core deposit intangibles
Other assets
Total assets acquired
Liabilities assumed
Deposits
FHLB advances
Other liabilities
Total liabilities assumed
Net identifiable assets
Goodwill
$
3,046 $
57,054
10,470
9,753
1,362
227,827
8,180
652
4,567
322,911
286,098
11,042
1,956
299,096
23,815
$
7,543 $
5,220 $
(5,220)
—
—
—
—
—
—
(850)
(850)
—
—
—
—
8,266
51,834
10,470
9,753
1,362
227,827
8,180
652
3,717
322,061
286,098
11,042
1,956
299,096
(850)
850 $
22,965
8,393
The fair value of net assets acquired includes fair value adjustments to certain receivables that were not considered impaired as of the
acquisition date. The fair value adjustments were determined using discounted contractual cash flows. However, the Corporation
believes that all contractual cash flows related to these financial instruments will be collected. As such, these receivables were not
considered impaired at the acquisition date and were not subject to guidance relating to purchase credit impaired loans, which have
shown evidence of credit deterioration since origination.
The following table presents supplemental pro forma information as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of 2020. The
unaudited pro forma information includes adjustments for interest income on loans and securities acquired, interest expense on deposits
acquired, and the related income tax effects. The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations
that would have occurred had the transactions been effected on the assumed dates.
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Net interest income
Net income
Basic and diluted earnings per share
Year ended December 31,
2020
2021
156,051
150,806
55,958
53,714
4.08
4.07
$
$
$
$
$
$
The fair value of purchased financial assets with credit deterioration was $12.9 million on the date of acquisition. The gross contractual
amounts receivable relating to the purchased financial assets with credit deterioration was $18.3 million. The Corporation estimates, on
68
the date of acquisition, that $4.4 million of the contractual cash flows specific to the purchased financial assets with credit deterioration
will not be collected.
7. ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES:
The following table presents the activity of the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment for the years ended December 31, 2022,
2021 and 2020.
Allowance for Credit Losses:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance
Provision for credit losses
Loans charged -off
Recoveries
Ending Balance
Allowance for Credit Losses:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance
PCD ACL on acquired loans
Provision for credit losses
Loans charged -off
Recoveries
Ending Balance
Allowance for Credit Losses:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance
Impact of adopting ASC 326
Provision for credit losses
Loans charged off
Recoveries
Ending Balance
December 31, 2022
Commercial Residential Consumer Unallocated
$ 18,883 $ 18,316 $ 10,721 $
(3,850)
(657)
759
6,131
(11,132)
6,384
(4,079)
(3,917)
2,062
Total
385 $ 48,305
(2,025)
(227)
(15,706)
—
9,205
—
158 $ 39,779
$ 12,949 $ 14,568 $ 12,104 $
December 31, 2021
Commercial Residential Consumer Unallocated
$ 13,925 $ 19,142 $ 11,009 $
4,410
1,637
(2,158)
1,069
—
(630)
(812)
616
—
1,074
(5,246)
3,884
$ 18,883 $ 18,316 $ 10,721 $
December 31, 2020
Total
0
385
—
—
— $ 44,076
4,410
2,466
(8,216)
5,569
385 $ 48,305
Commercial Residential Consumer Unallocated
$
Total
8,945 $
6,843
(1,622)
(1,097)
856
1,302 $
9,515
8,612
(944)
657
8,304 $
2,118
3,538
(6,355)
3,404
1,392 $ 19,943
17,084
(1,392)
10,528
—
(8,396)
—
4,917
—
— $ 44,076
$ 13,925 $ 19,142 $ 11,009 $
69
The following tables present the recorded investment in nonperforming loans by class of loans.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Commercial
Commercial & Industrial
Farmland
Non Farm, Non Residential
Agriculture
All Other Commercial
Residential
First Liens
Home Equity
Junior Liens
Multifamily
All Other Residential
Consumer
Motor Vehicle
All Other Consumer
TOTAL
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Commercial
Commercial & Industrial
Farmland
Non Farm, Non Residential
Agriculture
All Other Commercial
Residential
First Liens
Home Equity
Junior Liens
Multifamily
All Other Residential
Consumer
Motor Vehicle
All Other Consumer
TOTAL
December 31, 2022
Loans Past
Due Over
90 Days Still
Accruing
Nonaccrual
Nonaccrual
With No
Allowance
For Credit Loss
$
114 $
—
—
—
—
2,137 $
461
2,064
186
26
254
—
2,052
155
—
666
180
197
—
—
1,380
133
256
1,468
478
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,157 $
2,549
416
11,554 $
—
—
2,461
$
December 31, 2021
Loans Past
Due Over
90 Days Still
Accruing
Nonaccrual
Nonaccrual
With No
Allowance
For Credit Loss
$
14 $
—
—
—
—
1,950 $
15
2,911
111
4
1,662
—
2,898
—
—
346
—
89
—
—
94
—
$
543 $
2,339
84
294
225
107
33
—
—
—
—
864
686
9,590 $
—
—
4,593
70
During the years ending December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 the terms of certain loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings
(TDRs). The following tables present the activity for TDR’s.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
January 1,
Added
Disposed
Charged Off
Payments
December 31,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
January 1,
Added
Charged Off
Payments
December 31,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
January 1,
Added
Charged Off
Payments
December 31,
Commercial
$
407 $
305
—
—
(84)
628 $
2022
Residential
Consumer
706 $
68
(679)
—
(95)
— $
3,686 $
128
—
(50)
(589)
3,175 $
2021
$
Commercial
—
407
—
—
407
Residential
3,589
491
(29)
(365)
3,686
Consumer
617
402
(82)
(231)
706
Commercial
$
Residential
Consumer
11 $
—
—
(11)
— $
3,485 $
692
(6)
(582)
3,589 $
698 $
304
(158)
(227)
617 $
$
Total
4,799
501
(679)
(50)
(768)
3,803
Total
4,206
1,300
(111)
(596)
4,799
2020
Total
4,194
996
(164)
(820)
4,206
Modification of the terms of such loans typically include one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate of
the loan; an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk;
or a permanent reduction of the recorded investment in the loan. No modification in 2022, 2021 or 2020 resulted in the permanent
reduction of the recorded investment in the loan. Modifications involving a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan were for
periods ranging from twelve months to five years. Modifications involving an extension of the maturity date were for periods ranging
from twelve months to ten years.
During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 the Corporation modified 8, 39, and 42 loans respectively as troubled debt
restructurings. All of the loans modified were smaller balance residential and consumer loans. There were no loans that were charged
off within 12 months of the modification for 2022, 2021 or 2020.
The Corporation had no allocation of specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings
at December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020. The Corporation has not committed to lend additional amounts as of December 31, 2022 and
2021 to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings.
The CARES Act includes a provision that permits a financial institution to elect to suspend temporarily troubled debt restructuring
accounting under ASC Subtopic 310-40 in certain circumstances (“section 4013”). To be eligible under section 4013, a loan modification
must be (1) related to COVID-19; (2) executed on a loan that was not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019; and
(3) executed between March 1, 2020, and the earlier of (A) 60 days after the date of termination of the National Emergency or
(B) December 31, 2020. In response to this section of the CARES Act, the federal banking agencies issued a revised interagency
statement on April 7, 2020 that, in consultation with the Financial Accounting Standards Board, confirmed that for loans not subject to
section 4013, short-term modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were current prior to any
relief are not troubled debt restructurings under ASC Subtopic 310-40. This includes short-term (e.g., up to six months) modifications
such as payment deferrals, fee waivers, extensions of repayment terms, or delays in payment that are insignificant. Borrowers considered
current are those that are less than 30 days past due on their contractual payments at the time a modification program is implemented.
71
As of December 31, 2022 no loans remained under the program. As of December 31, 2021, 1,225 loans totaling $253 million were
modified, related to COVID-19, that were not considered troubled debt restructurings. As of December 31, 2021, 961 loans totaling
$210 million had resumed normal scheduled payments. 204 remaining loans were still under a debt relief plan, which include 9
commercial loans totaling $36 million that had been provided additional payment relief since the initial payment relief plan. 1 loan
totaling $17 thousand was under the original payment relief plan.
The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral dependent loans by class of loans:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Commercial
Commercial & Industrial
Farmland
Non Farm, Non Residential
Agriculture
All Other Commercial
Residential
First Liens
Home Equity
Junior Liens
Multifamily
All Other Residential
Consumer
Motor Vehicle
All Other Consumer
Total
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Commercial
Commercial & Industrial
Farmland
Non Farm, Non Residential
Agriculture
All Other Commercial
Residential
First Liens
Home Equity
Junior Liens
Multifamily
All Other Residential
Consumer
Motor Vehicle
All Other Consumer
Total
December 31, 2022
Collateral Type
Real Estate
Other
$
4,613
3,289
5,123
—
—
—
—
—
—
895
—
—
13,920
$
1
—
—
155
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
156
December 31, 2021
Collateral Type
Real Estate
Other
$
$
$
$
17,734
3,669
6,135
—
—
33
—
—
935
—
720
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
720
—
—
28,506
$
$
72
The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in loans by past due category and class of loans.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Commercial
Commercial & Industrial
Farmland
Non Farm, Non Residential
Agriculture
All Other Commercial
Residential
First Liens
Home Equity
Junior Liens
Multifamily
All Other Residential
Consumer
Motor Vehicle
All Other Consumer
TOTAL
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Commercial
Commercial & Industrial
Farmland
Non Farm, Non Residential
Agriculture
All Other Commercial
Residential
First Liens
Home Equity
Junior Liens
Multifamily
All Other Residential
Consumer
Motor Vehicle
All Other Consumer
TOTAL
30-59 Days 60-89 Days and Greater
Past Due Past Due Past Due Past Due Current
Total
Total
December 31, 2022
90 Days
$
1,698 $
112
274
—
333
529 $
—
34
1,231
—
4,528
305
213
317
1,115
1,203
144
69
83
350
726 $ 2,953 $
—
—
—
14
1,054
276
327
—
—
112
308
1,231
347
6,785
725
609
400
1,465
674,569 $
127,498
387,108
136,451
478,095
677,522
127,610
387,416
137,682
478,442
341,131
63,615
56,367
180,305
24,058
347,916
64,340
56,976
180,705
25,523
15,151
341
$ 24,387 $
1,930
56
5,629 $
985
15
18,066
412
557,717
33,379
3,397 $ 33,413 $ 3,041,815 $ 3,075,228
539,651
32,967
30-59 Days 60-89 Days and Greater
Past Due Past Due Past Due Past Due Current
Total
Total
December 31, 2021
90 Days
1,614 $ 3,134 $
—
—
89
—
949
58
283
—
—
57
62
221
390
6,315
213
582
488
575
693,949 $
141,189
361,174
141,682
340,076
697,083
141,246
361,236
141,903
340,466
336,064
62,085
50,048
178,849
30,843
342,379
62,298
50,630
179,337
31,418
486
—
442,319
33,654
3,479 $ 21,490 $ 2,802,479 $ 2,823,969
433,095
33,425
9,224
229
$
1,132 $
57
62
90
390
388 $
—
—
42
—
4,686
131
179
342
284
7,633
192
$ 15,178 $
680
24
120
146
291
1,105
37
2,833 $
73
Credit Quality Indicators:
The Corporation categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt
such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic
trends, among other factors. The Corporation analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes
non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial loans, with an outstanding balance greater than $100 thousand. Any consumer loans
outstanding to a borrower who had commercial loans analyzed will be similarly risk rated. This analysis is performed on a quarterly
basis. The Corporation uses the following definitions for risk ratings:
Special Mention: Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left
uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit
position at some future date.
Substandard: Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and debt service capacity of the
borrower or of any pledged collateral. These loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses which have clearly jeopardized
repayment of principal and interest as originally intended. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will
sustain some future loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those graded substandard, with the added characteristic that
the severity of the weaknesses makes collection or liquidation in full highly questionable or improbable based upon currently existing
facts, conditions, and values.
Furthermore, non-homogeneous loans which were not individually analyzed, but are 90+ days past due or on non-accrual are classified
as substandard. Loans included in homogeneous pools, such as residential or consumer, may be classified as substandard due to 90+ days
delinquency, non-accrual status, bankruptcy, or loan restructuring.
Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated
loans. Loans listed as not rated are either less than $100 thousand or are included in groups of homogeneous loans.
74
The following tables present the commercial loan portfolio by risk category. These balances do not include accrued interest:
December 31, 2022
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial
Farmland
Non Farm, Non Residential
Agriculture
Other Commercial
Residential
Multifamily >5 Residential
Total
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
Subtotal
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
Subtotal
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
Subtotal
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
Subtotal
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
Subtotal
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
Subtotal
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2022
163,479
2,071
423
—
7,041
173,014
16,261
—
—
—
—
16,261
102,629
99
—
—
—
102,728
13,085
89
—
—
71
13,245
143,941
23
—
—
16
143,980
50,424
—
—
—
—
50,424
489,819
2,282
423
—
7,128
499,652
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Term Loans at Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
2018
2021
2020
2019
Revolving
Prior
Loans
Total
128,012
9,738
723
—
1,408
139,881
22,530
—
—
—
—
22,530
75,011
1,035
—
—
—
76,046
9,028
—
—
—
39
9,067
91,615
—
23
—
82
91,720
33,415
533
—
—
1,124
35,072
359,611
11,306
746
—
2,653
374,316
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
56,830
3,434
1,861
—
822
62,947
9,244
1,164
456
—
—
10,864
33,214
—
—
—
696
33,910
8,015
10
—
—
68
8,093
90,845
—
—
—
—
90,845
46,740
372
—
—
—
47,112
244,888
4,980
2,317
—
1,586
253,771
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
54,208
2,572
954
—
469
58,203
9,438
882
608
—
—
10,928
19,596
921
513
—
—
21,030
8,422
3
224
—
61
8,710
19,259
10
—
—
—
19,269
6,734
—
—
—
—
6,734
117,657
4,388
2,299
—
530
124,874
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26,514
2,061
3,169
—
149
31,893
10,352
—
337
—
—
10,689
31,438
—
—
—
—
31,438
1,987
—
1,201
—
25
3,213
29,143
—
—
—
29
29,172
4,969
—
—
—
—
4,969
104,403
2,061
4,707
—
203
111,374
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
99,522
1,848
6,264
—
85
107,719
48,847
2,930
1,969
—
17
53,763
111,586
279
6,281
—
269
118,415
26,729
709
56
—
—
27,494
82,535
11,911
6
—
480
94,932
27,353
6,795
1,280
—
263
35,691
396,572
24,472
15,856
—
1,114
438,014
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
92,110
453
9,103
—
—
101,666
340
—
—
—
—
340
2,975
—
—
—
—
2,975
62,397
2,519
762
—
—
65,678
5,602
—
—
—
—
5,602
96
—
—
—
—
96
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
620,675
22,177
22,497
—
9,974
675,323
117,012
4,976
3,370
—
17
125,375
376,449
2,334
6,794
—
965
386,542
129,663
3,330
2,243
—
264
135,500
462,940
11,944
29
—
607
475,520
169,731
7,700
1,280
—
1,387
180,098
163,520
2,972
9,865
—
—
176,357
$ 1,876,470
52,461
$
36,213
$
—
$
$
13,214
$ 1,978,358
75
Commercial
Commercial and Industrial
Farmland
Non Farm, Non Residential
Agriculture
Other Commercial
Residential
Multifamily >5 Residential
Total
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
Subtotal
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
Subtotal
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
Subtotal
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
Subtotal
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
Subtotal
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
Subtotal
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Not Rated
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2021
163,588
7,561
4,521
—
21,134
196,804
25,673
—
3,455
—
—
29,128
81,203
—
—
—
—
81,203
14,426
—
—
—
110
14,536
77,821
—
72
—
89
77,982
37,244
—
—
—
1,149
38,393
399,955
7,561
8,048
—
22,482
438,046
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Term Loans at Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
2017
2020
2018
2019
Revolving
Prior
Loans
Total
December 31, 2021
71,271
393
896
—
1,610
74,170
12,060
1,191
444
—
—
13,695
37,971
—
—
—
—
37,971
10,386
—
20
—
120
10,526
69,117
—
—
—
—
69,117
63,312
—
—
—
—
63,312
264,117
1,584
1,360
—
1,730
268,791
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
80,668
1,841
348
—
959
83,816
13,111
914
—
—
—
14,025
24,716
1,103
910
—
—
26,729
10,135
1,000
216
—
131
11,482
33,231
—
25
—
—
33,256
16,037
—
—
—
—
16,037
177,898
4,858
1,499
—
1,090
185,345
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
40,441
5,375
5,148
—
466
51,430
13,246
—
326
—
—
13,572
32,775
182
—
—
—
32,957
2,585
—
—
—
55
2,640
36,495
—
475
—
37
37,007
7,471
—
—
—
—
7,471
133,013
5,557
5,949
—
558
145,077
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
37,739
263
2,325
—
189
40,516
11,049
342
558
—
—
11,949
54,732
1,948
1,440
—
—
58,120
4,932
537
46
—
1
5,516
53,479
—
—
—
—
53,479
5,370
—
—
—
44
5,414
167,301
3,090
4,369
—
234
174,994
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
113,887
4,523
7,934
—
140
126,484
49,158
3,247
2,876
—
—
55,281
97,241
1,996
13,391
—
402
113,030
15,755
271
485
—
—
16,511
58,819
6,106
9
—
—
64,934
35,284
10,282
958
—
384
46,908
370,144
26,425
25,653
—
926
423,148
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
111,594
7,482
2,648
—
—
121,724
1,418
—
—
—
—
1,418
10,548
—
—
—
—
10,548
68,937
5,257
4,828
—
—
79,022
3,488
—
—
—
—
3,488
1,434
—
—
—
—
1,434
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
619,188
27,438
23,820
—
24,498
694,944
125,715
5,694
7,659
—
—
139,068
339,186
5,229
15,741
—
402
360,558
127,156
7,065
5,595
—
417
140,233
332,450
6,106
581
—
126
339,263
166,152
10,282
958
—
1,577
178,969
197,419
12,739
7,476
—
—
217,634
$ 1,709,847
61,814
$
54,354
$
$
—
27,020
$
$ 1,853,035
76
The Corporation evaluates the credit quality of its other loan portfolios, which includes residential real estate, consumer and lease
financing loans, based primarily on the aging status of the loan and payment activity. Accordingly, loans on non-accrual status, loans
past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest, and loans modified under troubled debt restructurings are considered to be
nonperforming for purposes of credit quality evaluation. The following table presents the other loan portfolio based on the credit risk
profile of loans that are performing and loans that are nonperforming. These balances do not include accrued interest:
Residential
First Liens
Home Equity
Junior Liens
Other Residential
Consumer
Motor Vehicle
Other Consumer
Term Loans at Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
Prior
Revolving
Loans
Total
December 31, 2022
Performing $
Non-performing
Subtotal $
71,607 $
106
71,713 $
70,197 $
—
70,197 $
45,080 $
—
45,080 $
16,968 $
141
17,109 $
20,258 $ 117,488 $
100
1,782
20,358 $ 119,270 $
3,245 $
— $
3,245 $
344,843
2,129
346,972
Performing $
Non-performing
Subtotal $
1,995 $
—
1,995 $
943 $
—
943 $
8 $
78
86 $
115 $
—
115 $
55 $
14
69 $
820 $
40
860 $
59,875 $
176 $
60,051 $
63,811
308
64,119
Performing $
Non-performing
Subtotal $
19,074 $
—
19,074 $
10,485 $
4
10,489 $
7,507 $
77
7,584 $
5,830 $
90
5,920 $
5,366 $
139
5,505 $
6,195 $
141
6,336 $
1,928 $
— $
1,928 $
56,385
451
56,836
Performing $
Non-performing
Subtotal $
11,542 $
—
11,542 $
9,923 $
—
9,923 $
501 $
—
501 $
915 $
425
1,340 $
498 $
35
533 $
1,582 $
18
1,600 $
— $
— $
— $
24,961
478
25,439
Performing $ 306,565 $ 118,362 $
Non-performing
813
Subtotal $ 307,378 $ 119,101 $
739
88,144 $
437
88,581 $
29,004 $
237
29,241 $
8,652 $
66
8,718 $
2,230 $
47
2,277 $
6 $
— $
6 $
552,963
2,339
555,302
Performing $
Non-performing
Subtotal $
13,426 $
18
13,444 $
7,914 $
247
8,161 $
4,109 $
89
4,198 $
1,302 $
39
1,341 $
429 $
12
441 $
819 $
12
831 $
4,819 $
2 $
4,821 $
32,818
419
33,237
Total
Total other loans
Performing $ 424,209 $ 217,824 $ 145,349 $
Non-performing
937
990
681
$ 425,146 $ 218,814 $ 146,030 $
54,134 $
932
55,066 $
35,258 $ 129,134 $
366
2,040
35,624 $ 131,174 $
69,873 $ 1,075,781
6,124
70,051 $ 1,081,905
178 $
77
Residential
First Liens
Home Equity
Junior Liens
Other Residential
Consumer
Motor Vehicle
Other Consumer
Term Loans at Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
Prior
Revolving
Loans
Total
December 31, 2021
Performing $
Non-performing
Subtotal $
86,224 $
—
86,224 $
49,633 $
—
49,633 $
22,262 $
35
22,297 $
24,377 $
69
24,446 $
26,437 $ 126,828 $
160
2,421
26,597 $ 129,249 $
3,061 $ 338,822
2,685
3,061 $ 341,507
— $
Performing $
Non-performing
Subtotal $
757 $
—
757 $
9 $
25
34 $
152 $
—
152 $
719 $
—
719 $
62 $
3
65 $
1,332 $
57
1,389 $
59,059 $
— $
59,059 $
62,090
85
62,175
Performing $
Non-performing
Subtotal $
13,255 $
—
13,255 $
10,189 $
6
10,195 $
8,124 $
64
8,188 $
7,888 $
97
7,985 $
4,158 $
119
4,277 $
5,554 $
94
5,648 $
968 $
— $
968 $
50,136
380
50,516
Performing $
Non-performing
Subtotal $
20,218 $
—
20,218 $
6,665 $
—
6,665 $
1,697 $
55
1,752 $
662 $
43
705 $
883 $
—
883 $
1,092 $
27
1,119 $
— $
— $
— $
31,217
125
31,342
Performing $ 188,675 $ 155,156 $
Non-performing
199
Subtotal $ 188,874 $ 155,529 $
373
60,676 $
191
60,867 $
23,367 $
109
23,476 $
9,307 $
43
9,350 $
2,384 $
23
2,407 $
— $ 439,565
938
— $
— $ 440,503
Performing $
Non-performing
Subtotal $
14,924 $
342
15,266 $
8,225 $
181
8,406 $
3,119 $
107
3,226 $
948 $
35
983 $
304 $
18
322 $
1,121 $
3
1,124 $
4,194 $
2 $
4,196 $
32,835
688
33,523
Total
Total other loans
Performing $ 324,053 $ 229,877 $
Non-performing
541
585
$ 324,594 $ 230,462 $
96,030 $
452
96,482 $
57,961 $
353
58,314 $
41,151 $ 138,311 $
343
2,625
41,494 $ 140,936 $
67,282 $ 954,665
4,901
67,284 $ 959,566
2 $
8.
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT:
Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Land
Building and leasehold improvements
Furniture and equipment
Less accumulated depreciation
TOTAL
December 31,
2022
17,888
70,310
46,669
134,867
(68,720)
66,147
$
$
2021
18,612
73,739
44,839
137,190
(67,668)
69,522
$
$
Aggregate depreciation expense was $4.8 million, $4.6 million and $4.4 million for 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
On October 31, 2022, First Financial Corporation issued a press release announcing plans to optimize its banking center network as part
of a plan to improve operating efficiencies and accommodate changing customer preferences. On January 31, 2023, the Corporation
closed and consolidated seven of its seventy-two branches. These consolidations are projected to save the Corporation approximately
$1.5 million per year in operating expenses, commencing in the first quarter of 2023. The Corporation recognized an impairment of $1.3
million on the value of the land and buildings on the owned buildings at these branches. One branch was leased, and no loss was
recognized on the terminated lease.
78
The Company leases certain branch properties and equipment under operating leases. Rent expense was $1.2 million, $1.4 million, and
$1.1 million for 2022, 2021, and 2020. Rent commitments, before considering renewal options that generally are present, were as
follows:
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter
$
$
929
563
479
329
228
680
3,208
See Note 19 for additional discussion on leases.
9.
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
The Corporation completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2022 and 2021. Management does
not believe any amount of goodwill is impaired.
Goodwill was as follows at year-end:
Beginning of year
Acquired goodwill
Impairment
End of year
2022
86,135 $
850
—
86,985 $
2021
78,592 $
7,543
—
86,135 $
2020
78,592
—
—
78,592
$
$
Goodwill related to the acquisition of Hancock Bancorp, Inc. was increased by $850 thousand in 2022 due to adjustments to deferred
tax assets related to the filing of the final Hancock Bancorp, Inc. tax return.
Intangible assets subject to amortization at December 31, 2022 and 2021 are as follows:
2022
2021
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Core deposit intangible
$
$
Gross
Amount
21,857 $
21,857 $
Accumulated
Amortization
15,143 $
15,143 $
Gross
Amount
21,857 $
21,857 $
Accumulated
Amortization
13,833
13,833
Aggregate amortization expense was $1.3 million, $1.6 million and $1.7 million for 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows:
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
In thousands
$
1,128
888
786
679
590
79
10.
DEPOSITS:
Time deposits that meet or exceed the FDIC Insurance limit of $250,000 at year-end 2022 and 2021 were $50.6 million and $74.0
million.
Scheduled maturities of time deposits for the next five years are as follows:
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
$
(dollar amounts in thousands)
274,613
68,801
23,789
16,832
13,185
11.
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS:
A summary of the carrying value of the Corporation’s short-term borrowings at December 31, 2022 and 2021 is presented below:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Federal Funds Purchased
Repurchase Agreements
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Average amount outstanding
Maximum amount outstanding at a month end
Average interest rate during year
Interest rate at year-end
2022
3,000
67,875
70,875
$
$
2021
3,275
90,099
93,374
$
$
2022
$
84,004
96,728
$
1.48 %
0.27 %
2021
99,810
117,337
0.40 %
0.08 %
Federal funds purchased are generally due in one day and bear interest at market rates. The Corporation enters into sales of securities
under agreements to repurchase. The amounts received under these agreements represent short-term borrowings and are reflected as a
liability in the consolidated balance sheets. The securities underlying these agreements are included in investment securities in the
consolidated balance sheets. The Corporation has no control over the market value of the securities, which fluctuates due to market
conditions. However, the Corporation is obligated to promptly transfer additional securities if the market value of the securities falls
below the repurchase agreement price. The Corporation manages this risk by maintaining an unpledged securities portfolio that it
believes is sufficient to cover a decline in the market value of the securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
Securities are pledged to cover these liabilities, which are not covered by federal deposit insurance. The Corporation maintains
possession of and control over these securities.
Collateral pledged to repurchase agreements by remaining
maturity are as follows:
Repurchase Agreements
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Mortgage Backed Securities - Residential and Collateralized
Mortgage Obligations
Repurchase Agreements
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Mortgage Backed Securities - Residential and Collateralized
Mortgage Obligations
December 31, 2022
Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
Overnight
and
continuous
Up to 30
days
30 - 90
days
Greater
than 90
days
Total
$
63,335 $
— $
4,175 $
365 $
67,875
December 31, 2021
Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
Overnight
and
continuous
Up to 30
days
30 - 90
days
Greater
than 90
days
Total
$
83,576 $
— $
5,816 $
707 $
90,099
80
12.
OTHER BORROWINGS:
Other borrowings at December 31, 2022 and 2021 are summarized as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
FHLB advances
TOTAL
2022
$
$
9,589
9,589
$
$
2021
15,937
15,937
The aggregate minimum annual retirements of other borrowings are as follows:
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter
$
$
1,008
2,635
5,946
—
—
—
9,589
At December 31, 2022 and 2021, other borrowings are summarized as follows: The Corporation’s subsidiary banks are members of the
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and accordingly are permitted to obtain advances. There are $9.6 million of advances from the FHLB
at December 31, 2022, and $15.9 million of advances at December 31, 2021, which accrue interest, payable monthly, at annual rates,
primarily fixed, varying from 0.68% to 1.70% in 2022 and 0.68% to 3.32% during the year in 2021. FHLB advances are, generally, due
in full at maturity. They are secured by eligible securities totaling $40.3 million at December 31, 2022, and $58.5 million at
December 31, 2021, and a blanket pledge on real estate loan collateral. Based on this collateral and the Corporation’s holdings of FHLB
stock, the Corporation is eligible to borrow up to $246.4 million at year end 2022. Certain advances may be prepaid, without penalty,
prior to maturity. The FHLB can adjust the interest rate from fixed to variable on certain advances, but those advances may then be
prepaid, without penalty.
13.
REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS:
All of the Corporation’s revenue from contracts with customers in the scope of ASC 606 is recognized within Non-Interest Income. The
following table presents the Corporation’s sources of Non-Interest Income for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Items
outside the scope of ASC 606 are noted as such.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Non-interest income
Service charges on deposits and debit card fee income
Asset management fees
Interchange income
Net gains on sales of loans (a)
Loan servicing fees (a)
Net gains/(losses) on sales of securities (a)
Other service charges and fees (a)
Other (b)
Total non-interest income
Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
$
$
$
27,540
5,155
559
1,994
1,554
3
665
9,246 (c)
$
46,716
24,700
5,255
438
5,003
1,849
114
1,163
3,562
42,084
(a) Not within the scope of ASC 606.
(b) The Other category includes gains/(losses) on the sale of OREO for the years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021,
totaling $60 thousand and $5 thousand, respectively, which is within the scope of ASC 606; the remaining balance is outside the
scope of ASC 606.
(c) Legal settlement totaling $4 million received in first quarter 2022, and $2.5 million from BOLI mortality payment in third quarter
2022.
81
Service charges on deposits: The Corporation earns fees from its deposit customers for transaction-based, account maintenance, and
overdraft services. Transaction-based fees, which include services such as ATM use fees, stop payment charges, statement rendering,
and ACH fees, are recognized at the time the transaction is executed as that is the point in time the Corporation fulfills the customer’s
request. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance, are earned over the course of a month, representing
the period over which the Corporation satisfies the performance obligation. Overdraft fees are recognized at the point in time that the
overdraft occurs. Service charges on deposits are withdrawn from the customer’s account balance.
Asset management fees: The Corporation earns asset management fees from its contracts with trust customers to manage assets for
investment, and/or to transact on their accounts. These fees are primarily earned over time as the Corporation provides the
contracted monthly or quarterly services and are generally assessed based on a tiered scale of the market value of assets under
management at month-end. Fees that are transaction based, including trade execution services, are recognized at the point in time that
the transaction is executed, i.e. the trade date. Other related services provided and the fees the Corporation earns, which are based on a
fixed fee schedule, are recognized when the services are rendered.
Interchange income: The Corporation earns interchange fees from debit and credit cardholder transactions conducted through the
payment network. Interchange fees from cardholder transactions represent a percentage of the underlying transaction value and are
recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services provided to the cardholder.
Gains/Losses on sales of OREO: The Corporation records a gain or loss from the sale of OREO when control of the property transfers
to the buyer, which generally occurs at the time of an executed deed. When the Corporation finances the sale of OREO to the buyer, the
Corporation assesses whether the buyer is committed to perform their obligations under the contract and whether collectability of the
transaction price is probable. Once these criteria are met, the OREO asset is derecognized and the gain or loss on sale is recorded upon
the transfer of control of the property to the buyer. In determining the gain or loss on the sale, the Corporation adjusts the transaction
price and related gain (loss) on sale if a significant financing component is present.
14.
INCOME TAXES:
Income tax expense is summarized as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Federal:
Currently payable
Deferred
State:
Currently payable
Deferred
TOTAL
2022
2021
2020
$
$
11,016
2,277
13,293
2,485
873
3,358
16,651
$
$
$
7,978
1,488
9,466
3,080
80
3,160
12,626
$
7,886
1,188
9,074
2,422
196
2,618
11,692
The reconciliation of income tax expense with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% to income
before income taxes is summarized as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Federal income taxes computed at the statutory rate
Add (deduct) tax effect of:
Tax exempt income
ESOP dividend deduction
State tax, net of federal benefit
General business tax credits
Other, net
TOTAL
2022
2021
2020
$
18,430
$
13,779
$
13,763
(3,439)
(103)
2,653
(674)
(216)
16,651
$
(2,745)
(101)
2,496
(716)
(87)
12,626
$
(2,643)
(98)
2,068
(1,648)
250
11,692
$
82
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31,
2022 and 2021, are as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Other than temporary impairment
Net unrealized losses on retirement plans
Net unrealized loss on available for sale securities
Loan loss provisions
Unfunded commitments
Deferred compensation
Compensated absences
Post-retirement benefits
Lease liability
Purchase accounting
Other
GROSS DEFERRED ASSETS
Deferred tax liabilities:
Net unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale
Depreciation
Mortgage servicing rights
Pensions
Right-of-use asset
Intangibles
FHLB stock dividends
Other
GROSS DEFERRED LIABILITIES
NET DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
2022
2021
$
$
752
5,614
39,242
10,054
537
1,957
709
1,051
1,572
114
3,018
64,620
—
(660)
(458)
(1,120)
(1,566)
(6,093)
(32)
(4,118)
(14,047)
50,573
$
$
764
6,033
—
12,476
764
2,367
739
1,284
1,597
1,333
2,770
30,127
(4,269)
(1,611)
(515)
(1,647)
(1,591)
(5,717)
(32)
(4,113)
(19,495)
10,632
Unrecognized Tax Benefits — A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Balance at January 1
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Additions based on tax positions related to prior years
Reductions due to the statute of limitations
Balance at December 31
2022
2021
2020
$
$
808
59
—
(9)
858
$
$
867
9
—
(68)
808
$
$
825
114
—
(72)
867
Of this total, $858 thousand represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective
income tax rate in future periods. The Corporation does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase
or decrease in the next 12 months.
The total amount of interest and penalties recorded in the income statement for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was
an expense increase of $18 thousand, an increase of $21 thousand, and an increase of $11 thousand, respectively. The amount accrued
for interest and penalties at December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was $103 thousand, $85 thousand and $64 thousand, respectively.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of the states of Indiana, Illinois,
Kentucky, Tennessee, and other states. The Corporation is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2019.
15.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK:
The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing
needs of its customers. These financial instruments include conditional commitments and commercial letters of credit. The financial
instruments involve to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of amounts recognized in the financial
83
statements. The Corporation’s maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial
instrument for commitments to make loans is limited generally by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Corporation follows
the same credit policy to make such commitments as is followed for those loans recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
Commitment and contingent liabilities are summarized as follows at December 31:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Home Equity
Commercial Operating Lines
Other Commitments
TOTAL
Commercial letters of credit
2022
91,218
616,399
112,410
820,027
7,834
$
$
$
2021
92,346
610,965
120,111
823,422
7,042
$
$
$
The majority of commercial operating lines and home equity lines are variable rate, while the majority of other commitments to fund
loans are fixed rate. Fixed rate commitments had a range of interest rates from 5.45% to 9.00% in 2022. In 2021 this range of rates was
from 3.25% to 6.00%. Since many commitments to make loans expire without being used, these amounts do not necessarily represent
future cash commitments. Collateral obtained upon exercise of the commitment is determined using management’s credit evaluation of
the borrower, and may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, land and other items. The approximate duration of these
commitments is generally one year or less.
Derivatives: The Corporation enters into derivative instruments for the benefit of its customers. At the inception of a derivative contract,
the Corporation designates the derivative as an instrument with no hedging designation (“standalone derivative”). Changes in the fair
value of derivatives are reported currently in earnings as non-interest income. Net cash settlements on derivatives that do not qualify for
hedge accounting are reported in non-interest income.
First Financial Bank offers clients the ability on certain transactions to enter into interest rate swaps. Typically, these are pay fixed,
receive floating swaps used in conjunction with commercial loans. These derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting. The
Bank hedges the exposure to these contracts by entering into offsetting contracts with substantially matching terms. The notional amount
of these interest rate swaps was $39.9 million and $32.9 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021. The fair value of these contracts
combined was zero, as gains offset losses. The gross losses associated with these interest rate swaps was $2.8 million and $1.0 million
at December 31, 2022 and 2021. These balances are included in other assets and other liabilities.
16.
RETIREMENT PLANS:
Employees of the Corporation are covered by a retirement program that consists of a defined benefit plan and an employee stock
ownership plan (ESOP). Plan assets consist primarily of the Corporation’s stock and obligations of U.S. Government agencies. Benefits
under the defined benefit plan are actuarially determined based on an employee’s service and compensation, as defined, and funded as
necessary. This plan was frozen for the majority of employees as of December 31, 2012.Those employees will be eligible to participate
in a 401K plan that the Corporation can contribute a discretionary match of the pay contributed by the employee. In addition the ESOP
plan will continue in place for all employees.
Assets in the ESOP are considered in calculating the funding to the defined benefit plan required to provide such benefits. Any shortfall
of benefits under the ESOP are to be provided by the defined benefit plan. The ESOP may provide benefits beyond those determined
under the defined benefit plan. Contributions to the ESOP are determined by the Corporation’s Board of Directors. The Corporation
made contributions to the defined benefit plan of $126 thousand, $2.05 million and $4.44 million in 2022, 2021 and 2020. The
Corporation contributed $1.45 million, $1.40 million and $1.47 million to the ESOP in 2022, 2021 and 2020. There were contributions
of $1.1 million, $1.1 million and $1.2 million to the ESOP for employees no longer participating in the defined benefit plan in 2022,
2021 and 2020 respectively.
The Corporation uses a measurement date of December 31.
84
Net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income included the following components:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
Expected return on plan assets
Net amortization and deferral
Net periodic pension cost
Net loss (gain) during the period
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of unrecognized (gain) loss
Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss
Total recognized net periodic pension cost and other comprehensive income
2022
1,190 $
2,826
(4,910)
1,259
365
(5,323)
—
(1,259)
(6,582)
(6,217) $
2021
1,355 $
2,632
(4,713)
2,072
1,346
(5,883)
(1)
(2,072)
(7,956)
(6,610) $
2020
1,300
3,116
(4,198)
1,968
2,186
3,188
(1)
(1,967)
1,220
3,406
$
$
The information below sets forth the change in projected benefit obligation, reconciliation of plan assets, and the funded status of the
Corporation’s retirement program. Actuarial present value of benefits is based on service to date and present pay levels.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at January 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial (gain) loss
Benefits paid
Benefit obligation at December 31
Reconciliation of fair value of plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at January 1
Actual return on plan assets
Employer contributions
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at December 31
Funded status at December 31 (plan assets less benefit obligation)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2022 and 2021 consist of:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Net loss (gain)
Prior service cost (credit)
2022
14,469
—
14,469
$
$
The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plan was $81.5 million and $102.4 million at year-end 2022 and
2021.
Principal assumptions used to determine pension benefit obligation at year end:
Discount rate
Rate of increase in compensation levels
Principal assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost:
Discount rate
Rate of increase in compensation levels
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
2022
2021
5.02 %
3.00
2.83 %
3.00
2022
2021
2.83 %
3.00
6.00
2.52 %
3.00
6.00
85
2022
2021
$
$
106,496
1,190
2,826
(21,350)
(5,584)
83,578
87,979
(11,117)
456
(5,584)
71,734
(11,844)
$
$
$
$
109,922
1,355
2,632
(2,943)
(4,470)
106,496
82,437
7,654
2,358
(4,470)
87,979
(18,517)
2021
21,051
—
21,051
The expected long-term rate of return was estimated using market benchmarks for equities and bonds applied to the plan’s target asset
allocation. Management estimated the rate by which plan assets would perform based on historical experience as adjusted for changes
in asset allocations and expectations for future return on equities as compared to past periods.
Plan Assets — The Corporation’s pension plan weighted-average asset allocation for the years 2022 and 2021 by asset category are as
follows:
Pension Plan
Target
Allocation
ESOP
Target
Allocation
ASSET CATEGORY
Equity securities
Debt securities
Other
TOTAL
2022
25-75 %
0-50 %
0-20 %
2022
95-99 %
0-0 %
0-5 %
Pension
Percentage of Plan
Assets at December 31,
2021
2022
ESOP
Percentage of Plan
Assets at December 31,
2021
2022
63 %
34 %
3 %
100 %
63 %
32 %
5 %
100 %
99 %
— %
1 %
100 %
98 %
— %
2 %
100 %
Fair Value of Plan Assets — Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset in the principal or most advantageous
market for the asset in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. It also establishes a fair value
hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when
measuring fair value.
The Corporation used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument:
Equity, Debt, Investment Funds and Other Securities — The fair values for investment securities are determined by quoted market
prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of
similar securities (Level 2). For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are
calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3).
The fair value of the plan assets at December 31, 2022 and 2021, by asset category, is as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Plan assets
Equity securities
Debt securities
Investment Funds
Total plan assets
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Plan assets
Equity securities
Debt securities
Investment Funds
Total plan assets
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2022 Using:
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
$
$
52,319 $
10,409
9,006
71,734 $
52,319 $
—
9,006
61,325 $
— $
10,409
—
10,409 $
—
—
—
—
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2021 Using:
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
$
$
62,382 $
10,102
15,495
87,979 $
62,382 $
—
15,495
77,877 $
— $
10,102
—
10,102 $
—
—
—
—
86
The investment objective for the retirement program is to maximize total return without exposure to undue risk. Asset allocation favors
equities. This target includes the Corporation’s ESOP, which is fully invested in corporate stock. Other investment allocations include
fixed income securities and cash.
The plan is prohibited from investing in the following: private placement equity and debt transactions; letter stock and uncovered options;
short-sale margin transactions and other specialized investment activity; and fixed income or interest rate futures. All other investments
not prohibited by the plan are permitted.
Equity securities in the defined benefit plan include First Financial Corporation common stock in the amount of $17.2 million (24 percent
of total plan assets) and $18.1 million (21 percent of total plan assets) at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. In addition the
ESOP for non plan participants holds an estimated $7.8 million and $7.2 million of First Financial Corporation stock at December 31,
2022 and December 31, 2021 respectively. Other equity securities are predominantly stocks in large cap U.S. companies.
Contributions — The Corporation expects to contribute zero to its pension plan and $642 thousand to its ESOP in 2023.
Estimated Future Payments — The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected:
PENSION BENEFITS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028-2032
$
6,844
7,034
7,175
7,384
7,490
38,028
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan — The Corporation has established a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) for
certain executive officers. The provisions of the SERP allow the Plan’s participants who are also participants in the Corporation’s
defined benefit pension plan to receive supplemental retirement benefits to help recompense for benefits lost due to the imposition of
IRS limitations on benefits under the Corporation’s tax qualified defined benefit pension plan. Expenses related to the plan were $751
thousand in 2022 and $748 thousand in 2021 and $539 thousand in 2020.The plan is unfunded and has a measurement date of
December 31. The amounts recognized in other comprehensive income in the current year are as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Net loss (gain) during the period
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of unrecognized (gain) loss
Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss
2022
(1,604) $
—
(418)
(2,022) $
$
$
2021
2020
54 $
—
(441)
(387) $
1,459
—
(246)
1,213
The Corporation has $7.5 million and $8.8 million recognized in the balance sheet as a liability at December 31, 2022 and 2021. Amounts
n accumulated other comprehensive income consist of $1.2 million net loss at December 31, 2022 and $3.2 million net loss at
December 31, 2021.
Estimated Future Payments — The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected:
(Dollar amounts on thousands)
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028-2032
$
—
374
731
711
730
3,457
87
Post-retirement medical benefits — The Corporation also provides medical benefits to certain employees subsequent to their
retirement. The Corporation uses a measurement date of December 31. Accrued post-retirement benefits as of December 31, 2022 and
2021 are as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at January 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Plan participants' contributions
Actuarial (gain)
Benefits paid
Benefit obligation at December 31
Funded status at December 31
December 31,
2022
2021
$
$
$
4,015
34
111
74
(758)
(301)
3,175
3,175
$
$
$
4,147
43
103
34
(53)
(259)
4,015
4,015
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of a net gain of $546 thousand at December 31, 2022 and
$212 thousand net loss at December 31, 2021. The post-retirement benefits paid in 2022 and 2021 of $300 thousand and $259 thousand,
respectively, were fully funded by company and participant contributions.
There is no estimated transition obligation for the post-retirement benefit plan that will be amortized from accumulated other
comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year.
Weighted average assumptions at December 31:
Discount rate
Initial weighted health care cost trend rate
Ultimate health care cost trend rate
Year that the rate is assumed to stabilize and remain unchanged
Post-retirement health benefit expense included the following components:
December 31,
2022
2021
5.02 %
5.00 %
5.00
2023
2.83 %
5.00 %
5.00
2022
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Service cost
Interest cost
Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)
Net periodic benefit cost
Net loss (gain) during the period
Amortization of prior service cost
Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)
Total recognized net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2022
2020
$
$
34 $
111
—
145
(758)
—
(758)
(613) $
43 $
103
—
146
(53)
—
(53)
93 $
38
125
—
163
238
—
238
401
Contributions — The Corporation expects to contribute $245 thousand to its other post-retirement benefit plan in 2023.
88
Estimated Future Payments — The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028-2032
$
245
251
247
244
244
1,171
17.
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION:
On February 5, 2011, the Corporation’s Board of Directors adopted and approved the First Financial Corporation 2011 Omnibus Equity
Incentive Plan (the “2011 Stock Incentive Plan”) effective upon the approval of the Plan by the Corporation’s shareholders, which
occurred on April 20, 2011 at the Corporation’s annual meeting of shareholders. The 2011 Stock Incentive Plan provides for the grant
of non qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and incentive
awards. An aggregate of 700,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan. A total of
245,598 shares of restricted common stock of the Corporation were granted under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan. On April 21, 2021 at
the Corporation’s annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholders approved the First Financial Corporation Amended and Restated
2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (“2011 Amended Plan”). An aggregate of 400,000 shares of common stock are reserved for
issuance under the 2011 Amended Plan. Shares issuable under the 2011 Amended Plan may be authorized and unissued shares of
common stock or treasury shares.
During the first quarter of 2022 and 2021, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company granted restricted
stock awards to certain executive officers pursuant to the Corporation’s annual performance-based stock incentive bonus plan.
Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of the stock at the grant date. The
value of the awards was determined by dividing the award amount by the median price of a share of Company common stock on the
grant dates. The restricted stock awards vest as follows — 33% on the first anniversary, 33% on the second anniversary and the
remaining 34% on the third anniversary of the earned date. The Corporation has the right to retain shares to satisfy any withholding tax
obligation. A total of 18,679 shares and 21,159 shares of restricted common stock of the Corporation were granted under the 2011
Amended Plan in 2022 and 2021, respectively. A total of 360,162 remain to be granted under this plan.
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock awards require certain service-based or performance requirements and have a vesting period of 3 years. Compensation
expense is recognized over the vesting period of the award based on the fair value of the stock at the date of issue. Compensation related
to the plan was $825 thousand, $807 thousand, and $820 thousand in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(shares in thousands)
Nonvested balance at January 1,
Granted during the year
Vested during the year
Forfeited during the year
Nonvested balance at December 31,
Number
Outstanding
2022
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number
Outstanding
2021
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
19,546
18,679
(19,098)
—
19,127
42.03
45.35
43.19
—
44.11
19,724
20,016
(19,105)
(1,089)
19,546
42.51
41.81
42.27
42.51
42.03
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, there was $844 thousand and $821 thousand, respectively of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested shares granted under the Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
The total fair value of the shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 was $880 thousand and $865 thousand,
respectively.
89
18. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):
The following table summarizes the changes, net of tax within each classification of accumulated other comprehensive income for
the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1,
Change in other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
Ending balance, December 31,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1,
Change in other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
Ending balance, December 31,
Unrealized
gains and
(Losses) on available-
for-sale
Securities
$
$
15,674 $
(144,568)
(2)
(144,570)
(128,896) $
Unrealized
gains and
(Losses) on available-
for-sale
Securities
$
$
34,162 $
(18,403)
(85)
(18,488)
15,674 $
2022
Retirement
plans
(18,100) $
6,078
944
7,022
Total
(2,426)
(138,490)
942
(137,548)
(11,078) $ (139,974)
2021
plans
(24,398) $
4,744
1,554
6,298
(18,100) $
Total
9,764
(13,659)
1,469
(12,190)
(2,426)
Retirement
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale without other than
temporary impairment
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale with other than temporary
impairment
Total unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale
Unrealized gain (loss) on retirement plans
TOTAL
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale without other than
temporary impairment
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale with other than temporary
impairment
Total unrealized income (loss) on securities available-for-sale
Unrealized gain (loss) on retirement plans
TOTAL
Balance at
1/1/2022
Current Period
Change
Balance at
12/31/2022
$
13,155 $
(144,290) $
(131,135)
2,519
15,674 $
(18,100)
(2,426) $
(280)
(144,570) $
7,022
(137,548) $
2,239
(128,896)
(11,078)
(139,974)
$
$
Balance at
1/1/2021
Current Period
Change
Balance at
12/31/2021
$
31,810 $
(18,655) $
13,155
2,352
34,162 $
(24,398)
9,764 $
167
(18,488) $
6,298
(12,190) $
2,519
15,674
(18,100)
(2,426)
$
$
90
Details about accumulated
other comprehensive
income components
Unrealized gains and losses
on available-for-sale
securities
Amortization of
retirement plan items
Total reclassifications for the period
$
$
$
$
$
Year Ended December 31, 2022
Amount reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive income
(in thousands)
Affected line item in
the statement where
net income is presented
3
(1)
2
Net securities gains (losses)
Income tax expense
Net of tax
(1,259) (a)
315
(944)
(942)
Salary and benefits
Income tax expense
Net of tax
Net of tax
(a) Included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost which is included in salaries and benefits. (see Footnote 16 for additional
details).
Details about accumulated
other comprehensive
income components
Unrealized gains and losses
on available-for-sale
securities
Amortization of
retirement plan items
Total reclassifications for the period
$
$
$
$
$
Balance at December 31, 2021
Amount reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive income
(in thousands)
Affected line item in
the statement where
net income is presented
114
(29)
85
Net securities gains (losses)
Income tax expense
Net of tax
(2,072) (a)
518
(1,554)
(1,469)
Salary and benefits
Income tax expense
Net of tax
Net of tax
(a) Included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost which is included in salaries and benefits. (see Footnote 16 for additional
details).
Details about accumulated
other comprehensive
income components
Unrealized gains and losses
on available-for-sale
securities
Amortization of
retirement plan items
Total reclassifications for the period
$
$
$
$
$
Balance at December 31, 2020
Amount reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive income
(in thousands)
Affected line item in
the statement where
net income is presented
233
(58)
175
Net securities gains (losses)
Income tax expense
Net of tax
(1,967) (a)
492
(1,475)
(1,300)
Income tax expense
Net of tax
Net of tax
(a) Included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost which is included in salaries and benefits. (see Footnote 16 for additional
details).
91
19.
LEASES:
The Corporation leases certain branches under operating leases. At December 31, 2022, the Corporation had lease liabilities totaling
$5,885,000 and right-of-use assets totaling $5,840,000 related to these leases. Lease liabilities and right-of-use assets are reflected in
other liabilities and other assets, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the weighted average remaining lease term for
operating leases was 9.6 years and the weighted average discount rate used in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was 2.18%.
The calculated amount of the lease liabilities and right-of-use assets are impacted by the length of the lease term and the discount rate
used to present value the minimum lease payments. The Corporation’s lease agreements often include one or more options to renew at
the Corporation’s discretion. If at lease inception, the Corporation considers the exercising of a renewal option to be reasonably certain,
the Corporation will include the extended term in the calculation of the lease liability and right-of-use asset. Regarding the discount rate,
the new standard requires the use of the rate implicit in the lease whenever this rate is readily determinable. As this rate is rarely
determinable, the Corporation utilizes its incremental borrowing rate at lease inception, on a collateralized basis, over a similar term.
For operating leases existing prior to January 1, 2019, the rate for the remaining lease term as of January 1, 2019 was used.
The following table represents lease costs and other lease information. As the Corporation elected, not to separate lease and non-lease
components and instead to account for them as a single lease component, the variable lease cost primarily represents variable payments
such as common area maintenance and utilities.
Lease costs were as follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Operating lease cost
Short-term lease cost
Variable lease cost
Total lease cost
Other information:
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities
$
$
Year Ended
December 31, 2022
1,018
200
11
1,229
985
59
Future minimum payments for operating leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more as of December 31, 2022 were as
follows:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter
Total Future Minimum Lease Payments
Amounts Representing Interest
Present Value of Net Future Minimum Lease Payments
December 31, 2022
$
$
930
838
794
713
686
2,618
6,579
(694)
5,885
92
20.
REGULATORY MATTERS:
The Corporation and its bank affiliates are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking
agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory—and possibly additional discretionary—actions
by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporation’s financial statements.
Further, the Corporation’s primary source of funds to pay dividends to shareholders is dividends from its subsidiary banks and
compliance with these capital requirements can affect the ability of the Corporation and its banking affiliates to pay dividends. At
December 31, 2022, none of undistributed earnings of the subsidiary banks, included in consolidated retained earnings, were available
for distribution to the Corporation with regulatory approval. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, the Corporation and Banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the
Corporation’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The
Corporation’s and Banks’ capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about
components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Corporation and Banks to maintain minimum
amounts and ratios of Total, Common equity tier I capital and Tier I Capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier I Capital to average
assets. Under the Basel III rules, the Corporation must hold a capital conservation buffer above the adequately capitalized risk-based
capital ratios. The net unrealized gain or loss on available for sale securities is not included in computing regulatory capital.
Management believes, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, that the Corporation meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is
subject.
As of December 31, 2022, the most recent notification from the respective regulatory agencies categorized the subsidiary banks as well
capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the banks must maintain
minimum total risk-based, Common equity tier I capital, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are
no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the banks’ category.
93
The following table presents the actual and required capital amounts and related ratios for the Corporation and First Financial Bank,
N.A., at year-end 2022 and 2021.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Total risk-based capital
Corporation – 2022
Corporation – 2021
First Financial Bank – 2022
First Financial Bank – 2021
Common equity tier I capital
Corporation – 2022
Corporation – 2021
First Financial Bank – 2022
First Financial Bank – 2021
Tier I risk-based capital
Corporation – 2022
Corporation – 2021
First Financial Bank – 2022
First Financial Bank – 2021
Tier I leverage capital
Corporation – 2022
Corporation – 2021
First Financial Bank – 2022
First Financial Bank – 2021
Actual
Amount
Ratio
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
Ratio
Amount
To Be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
Amount
Ratio
$ 561,347
533,599
498,246
487,416
14.61 % $ 403,400
15.63 %
358,575
13.14 % 398,179
14.78 % 346,248
N/A
10.500 %
10.500 %
N/A
10.500 % 379,219
10.500 % 329,760
N/A
N/A
10.00 %
10.00 %
$ 521,568
490,842
458,467
446,189
13.58 % $ 268,933
14.37 %
239,050
12.09 % 265,453
13.53 % 230,832
N/A
7.000 %
7.000 %
N/A
7.000 % 246,492
7.000 % 214,344
$ 521,568
490,842
458,467
446,189
13.58 % $ 326,562
290,275
14.37 %
12.09 % 322,336
13.53 % 280,296
N/A
8.500 %
N/A
8.500 %
8.500 % 303,375
8.500 % 263,808
$ 521,568
490,842
458,467
446,189
10.78 % $ 193,476
9.83 %
199,702
9.50 % 193,073
9.18 % 194,405
N/A
4.00 %
4.00 %
N/A
4.00 % 241,341
4.00 % 243,006
N/A
N/A
6.50 %
6.50 %
N/A
N/A
8.00 %
8.00 %
N/A
N/A
5.00 %
5.00 %
In December 2018, the OCC, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the FDIC approved a final rule to address
changes to credit loss accounting under GAAP, including banking organizations’ implementation of CECL. The final rule provides
banking organizations the option to phase in over a three-year period the day-one adverse effects on regulatory capital that may result
from the adoption of the new accounting standard. In March 2020, the OCC, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
and the FDIC published an interim final rule to delay the estimated impact on regulatory capital stemming from the implementation of
CECL. The interim final rule maintains the three-year transition option in the previous rule and provides banks the option to delay for
two years an estimate of CECL’s effect on regulatory capital, relative to the incurred loss methodology’s effect on regulatory capital,
followed by a three-year transition period (five-year transition option). The Corporation is not adopting the capital transition relief.
94
21.
PARENT COMPANY CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
The parent company’s condensed balance sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related condensed statements of income
and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, are as follows:
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
ASSETS
Cash deposits in affiliated banks
Investments in subsidiaries
Land and headquarters building, net
Other
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities
Dividends payable
Other liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
Shareholders' Equity
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Dividends from subsidiaries
Other income
Interest on borrowings
Other operating expenses
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
Income tax benefit
Income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
Net income
$
$
December 31,
2022
2021
$
60,692 $
412,570
9,116
42,120
$
524,498 $
13,844
571,986
4,423
7,518
597,771
8,912
40,293
49,205
475,293
524,498 $
7,952
7,243
15,195
582,576
597,771
$
2022
94,048 $
Years Ended December 31,
2021
99,231 $
746
—
(2,611)
97,366
681
98,047
(45,060)
52,987 $
1,254
—
(3,435)
91,867
1,110
92,977
(21,868)
71,109 $
2020
31,069
1,054
(374)
(3,430)
28,319
801
29,120
24,724
53,844
Comprehensive income (loss)
$
(66,439) $
40,797 $
71,109
95
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Equity in undistributed earnings
Contribution of shares to ESOP
Restricted stock compensation
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
(Increase) decrease in other assets
NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
(Increase) decrease in premises and equipment
Cash received (disbursed) from acquisitions
NET CASH FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Principal payments on borrowings
Purchase of treasury stock
Dividends paid
NET CASH FROM FINANCING ACTIVITES
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH
CASH, BEGINNING OF YEAR
CASH, END OF YEAR
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest
Income taxes
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2022
$
71,109 $
52,987 $
53,844
297
21,868
1,451
825
33,050
(34,602)
93,998
191
45,060
1,402
807
435
(1,518)
99,364
328
(24,724)
1,471
820
6,127
(5,977)
31,889
(4,990)
—
(4,990)
—
(31,348)
(31,348)
—
—
—
—
(27,701)
(14,459)
(42,160)
46,848
13,844
60,692 $
—
(42,471)
(14,181)
(56,652)
11,364
2,480
(10,310)
(9,220)
(14,273)
(33,803)
(1,914)
4,394
2,480
$
13,844 $
$
$
— $
13,525 $
— $
15,025 $
375
7,549
ITEM 9.
None
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation (the “Evaluation”), under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), who serves as our principal executive officer, and Chief Financial Officer
(“CFO”), who serves as our principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (“Disclosure
Controls”). Based on the Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our Disclosure Controls are effective and designed to ensure
that the information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Corporation’s fourth fiscal
quarter of 2022 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial
reporting.
96
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Attestation Report of the Registered Public
Accounting Firm
“Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”
are included in Item 8 hereof and incorporated by reference.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 9C.
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
In accordance with the provisions of General Instruction G to Form 10-K, the information required for disclosure under Item 10 is not
set forth herein because the Corporation intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a definitive Proxy Statement
pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days following the end of its 2022 fiscal year, which Proxy Statement will contain such
information. The information required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to such Proxy Statement.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In accordance with the provisions of General Instruction G to Form 10-K, the information required for disclosure under Item 11 is not
set forth herein because the Corporation intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a definitive Proxy Statement
pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days following the end of its 2022 fiscal year, which Proxy Statement will contain such
information. The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to such Proxy Statement.
97
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
In accordance with the provisions of General Instruction G to Form 10-K, certain information required for disclosure under Item 12
(relating to Item 403 of Regulation S-K) is not set forth herein because the Corporation intends to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission a definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days following the end of its 2022 fiscal year,
which Proxy Statement will contain such information. Such information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to such
Proxy Statement.
Following is the information required by Item 12 relating to Item 201 (d) of Regulation S-K.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides certain information as of December 31, 2022 with respect to the Corporation’s equity compensation plans
under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance.
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved by security
holders (2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security
holders (3)
Total
Number of Securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants of outstanding options, warrants Number of securities
and rights
Weighted average exercise price
remaining (1)
and rights
—
—
—
—
—
—
360,162
—
360,162
(1) Available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column).
(2) Includes the First Financial Corporation Amended and Restated 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.
(3) The Corporation has no equity compensation plan that has not been authorized by its stockholders.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
In accordance with the provisions of General Instruction G to Form 10-K, the information required for disclosure under Item 13 is not
set forth herein because the Corporation intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a definitive Proxy Statement
pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days following the end of its 2022 fiscal year, which Proxy Statement will contain such
information. The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to such Proxy Statement.
98
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
In accordance with the provisions of General Instruction G to Form 10-K, the information required for disclosure under Item 14 is not
set forth herein because the Corporation intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a definitive Proxy Statement
pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days following the end of its 2022 fiscal year, which Proxy Statement will contain such
information. The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to such Proxy Statement.
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
PART IV
(a) (1) The following consolidated financial statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries are filed as part of this document
under “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2022 and 2021
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income—Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity—Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(a) (2) Schedules to the Consolidated Financial Statements required by Article 9 of Regulation S-X are not required, inapplicable,
or the required information has been disclosed elsewhere.
99
(a) (3) Listing of Exhibits:
Exhibit
Number
3.1
3.2
3.3
Description
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of First Financial Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the
Corporation’s Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
Amended and Restated Code of By-Laws of First Financial Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Corporation’s
Form 8-K filed February 22, 2021.
Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of First Financial Corporation, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Corporation’s Form 8-K filed April 27, 2021.
10.1*
Employment Agreement for Norman L. Lowery, effective July 1, 2022, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of the Corporation’s
Form 8-K filed July 29, 2022.
10.2*
2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan of First Financial Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Corporation’s Form
10-Q filed for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
10.5*
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan of First Financial Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Corporation’s Form
8-K filed September 4, 2007.
10.6*
2005 Executives Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Corporation’s Form 8-K filed
September 4, 2007.
10.7*
2005 Executives Supplemental Retirement Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Corporation’s Form 8-K filed
September 4, 2007.
10.9*
First Financial Corporation 2010 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the
Corporation’s Form 10-K filed March 15, 2011.
10.10*
First Financial Corporation 2011 Short Term Incentive Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the
Corporation’s Form 10-K filed March 15, 2011.
10.11*
First Financial Corporation Amended and Restated 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to
the Corporation’s Form 8-K for the annual meeting filed April 27, 2021.
10.12*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.12 to the Corporations 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2012 filed May 10, 2012.
10.13*
Employment Agreement for Norman D. Lowery, effective July 1, 2022, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Corporation’s
Form 8-K filed July 29, 2022.
10.14*
Employment Agreement for Rodger A. McHargue, effective July 1, 2022, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Corporation’s Form 8-K filed July 29, 2022.
10.15*
Employment Agreement for Steven H. Holliday, effective July 1, 2022, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Corporation’s
Form 8-K filed July 29, 2022.
10.16*
Employment Agreement for Mark A. Franklin, effective July 1, 2022, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Corporation’s
Form 8-K filed July 29, 2022.
21
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.
Subsidiaries
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) for Annual Report of Form 10-K by Principal Executive Officer
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) for Annual Report of Form 10-K by Principal Financial Officer
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Principal Executive Officer
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Principal Financial Officer
The following material from First Financial Corporation’s Form 10-K Report for the annual period ended December 31, 2022,
formatted in Inline XBRL pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements
of Income and Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes
in Shareholders’ Equity, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements**
104.
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
*Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report.
**Furnished, not filed, for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.
(b) Exhibits-Filed Exhibits to (a) (3) listed above are attached to this report.
(c) Financial Statements Schedules-No schedules are required to be submitted. See response to ITEM 15(a) (2).
100
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Date: March 8, 2023
First Financial Corporation
/s/ Rodger A. McHargue
Rodger A. McHargue, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
101
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NAME
/s/ Rodger A. McHargue
Rodger A. McHargue, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Mark Blade
Mark Blade, Director
/s/ W. Curtis Brighton
W. Curtis Brighton, Director
/s/ Michael A. Carty
Michael A. Carty, Director
/s/ Thomas T. Dinkel
Thomas T. Dinkel, Director
/s/ Gregory L. Gibson
Gregory L. Gibson, Director
/s/ Susan M. Jensen
Susan M. Jensen, Director
/s/ William R. Krieble
William R. Krieble, Director
/s/ Norman D. Lowery
Norman D. Lowery, Chief Operations Officer & Director
/s/ Norman L. Lowery
Norman L. Lowery, Chairman, President, CEO & Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Tina J. Maher
Tina J. Maher, Director
/s/ Thomas C. Martin
Thomas C. Martin, Director
/s/ James O. McDonald
James O. McDonald, Director
/s/ Paul J. Pierson II
Paul J. Pierson II, Director
/s/ Ronald K. Rich
Ronald K. Rich, Director
102
DATE
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
/s/ Richard J. Shagley
Richard J. Shagley, Director
/s/ William J. Voges
William J. Voges, Director
March 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
103
Exhibit
Number
21
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Description
Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) for Annual Report of Form 10-K by Principal Executive Officer
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) for Annual Report of Form 10-K by Principal Financial Officer
Certification Pursuant to Rule 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Principal Executive Officer
Certification Pursuant to Rule 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Principal Financial Officer
The following material from First Financial Corporation’s Form 10-K Report for the annual period ended December
31, 2022, formatted in Inline XBRL pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii)
the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows,
(iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.*
104.
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
* Furnished, not filed, for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
104
On behalf of the Board of Directors,
Thank You
to our associates, shareholders and customers.
Board of Directors | First Financial Corporation and First Financial Bank
Front (left to right)
James O. McDonald
Norman L. Lowery
Tina J. Maher
Ronald K. Rich
Mark J. Blade
Thomas Martin
Back (left to right)
W. Curtis Brighton
William J. Voges
Richard J. Shagley
Paul J. Pierson
Susan M. Jensen
Michael A. Carty
William R. Krieble
Norman D. Lowery
Gregory L. Gibson
Thomas D. Dinkel